Tribunus Plebis Marcus Marcius Rex Quiritibus SPD
Senate Voting Results published on 3 March 2756.
The Senate has finished its latest session and the votes have been
tallied as below.
Formal debate ended at 09.00 Roman time, Sunday February 23 (diem
quintum Kalendas Martias MMDCCLVI) and voting began immediately
after. Voting ended at 19.00 Roman time Wednesday February 26 (ante
diem secundum Kalendas Martias MMDCCLVI). Results were officially
published by the presiding magistrate on the Senate list 28 February
2756.
I may quote Senator Lucius Sergius Australicus here: "It seems
strange that there has been essentially no discussion of these
matters until votes are cast."
The following 19 Senators cast votes in time. They are referred to
below by their initials, and are listed in alphabetical order by
nomen:
Marcus Arminius Maior (MAM)
Marcus Cassius Julianus (MCJ)
Patricia Cassia (PC)
Lucius Cornelius Sulla (LCS)
Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus (LEC)
Caius Flavius Diocletianus (CFD)
Caeso Fabius Quintilianus (CFQ)
Quintus Fabius Maximus (QFM)
Antonius Gryllus Graecus (AGG)
Alexander Iulius Caesar Probus Macedonicus (AICPM)
Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus (DIPI)
Titus Labienus Fortunatus (TLF)
Marcus Minucius Audens (MMA)
Marcus Octavius Germanicus (MOG)
Lucius Pompeius Octavianus (LPO)
Gnaeus Salix Astur (GSA)
Lucius Sergius Australicus Obstinatus (LSAO)
Lucius Sicinius Drusus (LSD)
Appius Tullius Marcellus Cato (ATMC)
The following Senator did not cast a vote [and his absence was not
announced or justified in line with the Senatus Consultum defining a
quorum (
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2001-07-18-
vii.html) and the LEX OCTAVIA DE SENATORIBUS
(
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-02-27-iv.html) which
this Tribune reads in conjunction]:
Gaius Marius Merullus (CMM)
The necessary majority for a Senatus consultum therefore was 11 votes
in favor.
"UTI ROGAS" indicates a vote in favor of an item, "ANTIQUO"
or "NEGAT" is a vote against, and "ABSTINEO" is an open abstention.
Square Brackets [ ] indicate explanations by the reporting Tribune.
The items for consideration were as follows
Agenda
Item I: [passed 19 in favor – 0 opposing]
Fl Vedius' now-defunct edictum allowing cives to use the Nova Roman
flag on Nova Roman related material, including Web sites, shall be
enacted as a Senatus Consultum.
[Introductory comments by TLF:] "The full text of agenda item I
follows. I believe that it is necessary to enact this as a permanent
policy, as there are now quite a few Web sites that are technically
violating our copyright. As has been pointed out, we can lose our
ownership of Nova Roma's intellectual property if we don't protect
it. Therefore, it seems best to unequivocally establish the policy,
rather than simply fail to enforce our right to the Nova Roman flag
in order to allow our cives to advertise us on the Web and elsewhere."
_____________
I. Fl Vedius' now-defunct edictum allowing cives to use the Nova
Roman flag on
Nova Roman related material, including Web sites, shall be enacted as
a Senatus
Consultum. The text of the edictum is as follows:
"Permission is hereby granted for all Citizens, magistrates,
provincia,
sodalitates, and other organizations of Nova Roma to use the image of
our flag
on websites related to Nova Roma. The image may, at the time of the
propagation
of this edict, be found at
http://www.novaroma.org/cursus_honorum/spqr.jpg on the main web site.
When
used, the image may not be altered in any way except to scale it up
or down in
size, and must be accompanied by the following HTML code (unaltered)
somewhere
on the same page as the flag image:
"The Nova Roman 'Gold SPQR in a gold wreath on a crimson field' flag
is a use-
protected trademark of Nova Roma and is used with permission.
"Permission to use the image of the Nova Roman flag in other
contexts, in
altered form, or without the accompanying attribution must still be
obtained
through the Consuls."
GSA: VTI ROGAS.
AGG: VTI ROGAS
CFD: Uti Rogas
CFQ: Uti Rogas!
MOG: Uti Rogas.
TLF: UTI ROGAS
LCS: Uti Rogas
MCJ: VTI ROGAS
LSD: Uti Rogas The Alternitive is ordering citizens to strip the Flag
from thier sites to protect our trademark.
ATC: Uti Rogas
MMA: YES [Uti rogas]
MAM: UTI ROGAS.
QFM: VTI ROGAS
LPO: UTI ROGAS
DIP: Uti Rogas.
AICPM: Uti Rogas
LEC: Vti Rogas
PC: VTI ROGAS
LSA: UTI ROGAS
Item II: [failed 9 in favor – 9 opposing – 1 abstention]
The Senate hereby establishes a minimum tax rate of $6 US.
GSA: ANTIQVO. I understand that there are good reasons to propose this
measure. However, I firmly believe that those citizens living in
poorer
regions should not pay relatively *more* to make for Nova Roma's
shortcomings.
AGG: ANTIQUO
CFD: Uti Rogas
CFQ: Uti Rogas!
MOG: Antiquo.
TLF: UTI ROGAS
LCS: Antiquo - This will hinder our development in terms of financial
stability considering that half of the funds go to the provinces.
With some citizens actually trying to draw up plans for growth in
Nova Roma this actually takes us backwards. Have there been any
studies done in regards to our inactive citizens to see if a lower
tax will produce more tax payers? Without any supporting evidence I
will vote against this measure.
MCJ: ANTIQUO To date I have seen no evidence that reducing the tax
rate will raise the number paying Citizens by any amount. I believe
such a rate would if anything discourage our Citizens, as it would
show non-commitment to building a financial base adequate for any of
our desired projects.
LSD: Uti Rogas There is a point where the effort of collecting the
tax exceeds the value collected, so a Minimum rate is needed.
ATC: Uti Rogas I believe that this is certainly a fair amount. Most
organizations have much higher fees.
MMA: YES [Uti rogas] It is in my mind that this reduction of the tax
rate will in fact enable those who could not before be rated as
taxpaying citizens to come into the fold as such. It may well be that
the concerns of my colleagues who oppose this measure are in fact
correct, as no-one has the ability to predict the decisions of
others, particularly those of a forign nation. language and culture.
But I am sure that everyone deserves the chance to be so, and as a
personal interpreter of some of the less fortunate areas of the
world, I know that while thier average salaries may not equal those
of the more developed West, thier pride is certainly equal to ours. I
say give them a chance to show it.)
MAM: UTI ROGAS.
QFM: ANTIQVO While I understand the convoluted reasoning of this, a
flat tax is not an answer, nor does it accomplish much. What the
Quaestors need, is determine the average tax that can be afforded by
each province, and set those accordingly. That was the original idea
behind all of taxation here in Nova Roma. Just like it is the
reasoning behind the tribute tax in the old republic. With this new
flat tax, we diminish revenue, not increase it.
LPO: ABSTINEO
DIP: Antiquo. Too often in Nova Roma there are proposals to change
the system before the existing machinery in place is allowed to work
for the first time. We voted to have a variable tax rate based on
national income. Let's try it as previously voted upon. This proposal
will partially raise the taxes of those in poorer countries while
leaving the wealthier countries untouched. What was the sense of
instituting the sliding scale if we are now going to partially bypass
it?
AICPM: Uti Rogas
LEC: Vti Rogas
PC: ANTIQVO
LSA: ANTIQUO I agree that we should let the last enacted tax law
prove its worth or folly before modifying it. In addition, I am still
opposed in principle to the idea that tax rates for individuals
should be based upon any average economic measure for the nation or
region in which they happen to live.
Item III. [passed 18 in favor – 0 opposing – 1 undisclosed abstention]
In all cases in which a Senatus Consultum specifies a deadline for
calling a meeting of the Senate, the presiding magistrate is given
leave to postpone the required meeting until the nearest dies
comitialis, even if this places the meeting after the specified
deadline.
GSA: VTI ROGAS.
AGG: VTI ROGAS
CFD: Uti Rogas
CFQ: Uti Rogas!
MOG: Uti Rogas.
TLF: UTI ROGAS
LCS: [did not cast vote on this item – counted as undisclosed
abstention]
MCJ: VTI ROGAS
LSD: Uti Rogas We have to maintain respect for the Gods.
ATC: Uti Rogas
MMA: YES [Uti rogas]
MAM: UTI ROGAS.
QFM: VTI ROGAS
LPO: UTI ROGAS
DIP: Uti Rogas.
AICPM: Uti Rogas
LEC: Vti Rogas
PC: VTI ROGAS
LSA: UTI ROGAS
Proroguing Existing Governors [individual votes are given only where
comments were made or where the candidate was not supported]
CFD: Gentlemen, I thank you all for your work in behalf of our res
publica. The provinces are the bricks for the Nova Roma building, and
we need dedicated citizens leading them. Continue your fine work
LSD: I Commend all the Provincial Praetors for thier work on behalf
of the Res Publica.
ATC: I have voted in favor of all, except for one which I abstained.
I hope this year sometime to find someone to replace me as
Propraetor. I simply don't have enough time do devote to the position
in a proper manner. I will do what I am able until then.
IV. Marcus Bianchius Antonius [passed 19 in favor – 0 opposing]
V. Appius Tullius Marcellus Cato [passed 18 in favor – 0 opposing – 1
abstaining]
ATC: Abstineo
VI. Caius Minucius Hadrianus [passed 19 in favor – 0 opposing]
DIP: Uti Rogas. He has done a most admirable job as the successor to
Marcus Audens and I am glad to have him as governor of my province.
PC: VTI ROGAS, with thanks for all he has done for Nova Britannia
Provincia.
VII. Caeso Fabius Quintilianus [passed 17 in favor – 1 opposing – 1
abstaining]
CFQ: Abstineo!
LCS: Antiquo. I must vote against this because I do not think he has
done an adequate job maintaining the Consulship and his provincia. I
would rather have a Consul who can devote the time and energy with
fewer mistakes then to have a Consul who is inadequate in leading the
State.
MMA - YES [Uti rogas] A resounding YES to this particular vote. This
gentleman has always done a magnificent job in his various
appointments and tasks in Nova Roma. He is now engaged with his
Honored Consular Colleague in the challenging task of setting aright,
within this micronation, those concerns which lesser men who went
before them have disrupted and aggrevated. It is my belief that we
need to support this active and able gentleman in any area for which
he believes himself to be qualified).
DIP: Uti Rogas. While I may not always see eye to eye politically
with Consul Quintilianus, he is a gentleman and well liked in his
province and fully deserving of being prorogued
VIII. Decimus Inius Silanus [passed 18 in favor – 0 opposing – 1
abstaining]
DIP: Uti Rogas. A credit to Nova Roma, his province and his gens. It
is an honor to vote to continue him in this office.
IX. Quintus Fabius Maximus [passed 18 in favor – 0 opposing – 1
abstaining]
QFM: ABSTANO
DIP: Uti Rogas. Another worthy gentleman who does great service to
his name and Nova Roma.
X. Caius Flavius Diocletianus [passed 18 in favor – 0 opposing – 1
abstaining]
CFD: Abstineo
DIP: Uti Rogas. A praiseworthy censor, senator, governor and Nova
Roman.
XI. Lucius Pompeius Octavianus [passed 18 in favor – 0 opposing – 1
abstaining]
LPO: ABSTINEO
XII. Marcus Arminius Maior [passed 18 in favor – 0 opposing – 1
abstaining]
MAM: ABSTINEO
XIII. Gaius Sentius Bruttius Sura [passed 19 in favor – 0 opposing]
XIV. Franciscus Apulus Caesar [passed 19 in favor – 0 opposing]
XV. Sextus Cornelius Cotta [passed 19 in favor – 0 opposing]
XVI. Petrus Domitianus Artorinus Longinus [passed 19 in favor – 0
opposing]
XVII. Antonius Gryllus Graecus [passed 18 in favor – 0 opposing – 1
abstaining]
AGG: ABSTINEO
Appointing New Governors [individual votes are given only where
comments were made or where the candidate was not supported]
ATC: I believe that they should be given the opportunity to "spread
their wings" so to speak.
XVIII. Gaius Popillius Laenas [passed 19 in favor – 0 opposing]
LSD: Uti Rogas Gaius Popillius did an outstanding job as Questor last
year. I'm certain that he will do the same in America Austrorientalis.
DIP: Uti Rogas. He will make a fine governor and is a worthy
successor to L. Sicinius Drusus.
LEC: Vti Rogas, I'm pleased, in addition to the fine candidate we
have here, that there are enough active cives to facilitate this
healthy turnover in the Provincia
XIX. Caius Iulius Barcinus Ciconius [passed 19 in favor – 0 opposing]
[Note of the reporting Tribune: Senator LSA voted to "prorogue" Gaius
Iulius Barcinus Ciconius , which was counted as support for
his "appointment", Senator LPO changed his original vote "proroguing"
Gaius Iulius Barcinus Ciconius to support for "appointment"]
LEC: Vti Rogas, Idem, would that other governores turn over the
reigns to new citizens, that more may become involved
The following items were being presented to the Senate again on
behalf of Consul CFQ.
Item XX. [passed 18 in favor – 1 opposing]
Approval of the Revised Budget (called "6 ISSUES PER YEAR") for
MMDCCLVI as
posted by Caeso Fabius Quintilianus with the following additions:
a/ The Eagle shall be printed in ten issues this year, the first
already being printed.
b/ The total sum in the Budget of $877 (printing = 499.00 + mailing =
378.00) for the Eagle should be set as the _maximum_ sum for the 10
issues for this year, the sum also includs the first issue for this
year. All money that may be left over from this sum stays in the
Treasury. The Curator Differum is free to use the above sum as he
finds best and he may move money between the printing and mailing
account as needed.
c/ The Curator Differum is free to find other ways to finace the
Eagle, among others he has the permission to sell mugs with the Nova
Roma Flag on them, with one hundred percent of the funds going to the
Eagle. This will have to be done without any start up funds and the
Curator will not be free to place any orders for mugs until he has
orders for them in hands.
d/ The Curator Differum is allowed to keep sums, given without any
binding promises, that are donated directly to the Eagle in a fund
only supporting the Eagle and its production. *Any long time projects
of any kind over the present year binding Nova Roma for any more
years of production of the Eagle as anything else than a web based
newsletter must be approved of by the Consuls and ultimately the
Senate.*
e/ Within these limits the Curator Differum is free to produce nine
more issues of the Eagle in the best way he can do it financially and
qualitywise.
f/ Further the Curator Differum is invited to consult those Senators
(Illustrus Decius Iunius Palladius, Illustrus Q. Fabius Maximus,
Illustrus Minucius Audens, Illustrus Marcus Cassius Julianus and
Illustus L. Sicinius Drusus) that may have good advises about
different production alternatives for the Eagle.
GSA: VTI ROGAS.
AGG: VTI ROGAS
CFD: Uti Rogas
CFQ: Uti Rogas!
MOG: Uti Rogas.
TLF: UTI ROGAS
LCS: Uti Rogas
MCJ: VTI ROGAS
LSD: Uti Rogas
ATC: Uti Rogas,
MMA: YES [Uti rogas]
MAM: UTI ROGAS.
QFM: ANTIQVO I believe that this is inadequate for the task.
LPO: UTI ROGAS
DIP: Uti Rogas. I here reiterate the comments I made during the
previous Senate session on this very item: I vote for this item
though I wish it did more for the long term preservation of the
Eagle. There is no clause in here setting a subscription rate or
allowing new subscribers. Essentially, it will allow the Eagle to die
when the current subscribers run out. This cannot be allowed to
happen; we must have some kind of tangible, real world publication,
not just another internet magazine as has been suggested (though that
would be fine for reference and old issues). Save the Eagle!
AICPM: Uti Rogas
LEC: Vti Rogas
PC: VTI ROGAS
LSA: UTI ROGAS
Item XXI. [passed 19 in favor – 0 opposing]
The state of Maine, in which Nova Roma is incorporated, requires
every nonprofit organization that is organized for the public benefit
to
restate this purpose in their yearly report. Therefore, the Senate
hereby reaffirms that Nova Roma is formed for the public benefit and
directs the consuls to see to it that the proper authorities are
apprised of this fact.
GSA: VTI ROGAS
AGG: VTI ROGAS.
CFD: Uti Rogas. An important issue.
CFQ: Uti Rogas!
MOG: Uti Rogas.
TLF: UTI ROGAS
LCS: Uti Rogas
MCJ: VTI ROGAS
LSD: Uti Rogas
ATC: Uti Rogas, This should of course be done. It seems like common
sense to me.
MMA: YES [Uti rogas]
MAM: UTI ROGAS.
QFM: VTI ROGAS Let it be carried out
LPO: UTI ROGAS
DIP: Uti Rogas.
AICPM: Uti Rogas. An important issue.
LEC: Vti Rogas
PC: VTI ROGAS This is a formality to meet a new requirement in Maine
law, and does not change anything in Nova Roma's constitution or
purpose.
LSA: UTI ROGAS
Item XXII. [passed 18 in favor – 0 opposing – 1 abstaining]
Roman Alburnus Maior is in big trouble, it is a Roman site and many
international institutions are trying to stop the exploitation of
Rosia Montana. This will damage this village.
I propose that the Senate support the community of Rosia Montana with
a statement of support. For information about this case see the text
about Roman Alburnus Maior written by Manius Constantinus Serapio.
The Consuls are given the task to see to that this decision is
executed.
GSA: VTI ROGAS. I thank quaestor Serapio's additional comments on
this issue. I am now happy to support it beyond any doubt.
AGG: VTI ROGAS
CFD: A sole statement of support is appropriate to show the community
of Rosia Montana that the res publica is by it´s side. No expenses
are connected with this statement. Alburnus Maior is a heritage from
our history, so I vote Uti Rogas.
CFQ: Uti Rogas!
MOG: Uti Rogas.
TLF: UTI ROGAS
LCS: Uti Rogas
MCJ: VTI ROGAS
LSD: Uti Rogas Since this has been clarified I pleased to be able to
vote for this.
ATC: Uti Rogas, As one who has signed the petition, I fully support
this move.
MMA: YES [Uti rogas]
MAM: UTI ROGAS.
QFM: VTI ROGAS Verbal Support only...
LPO: UTI ROGAS
DIP: Uti Rogas. I am satisfied with the explanation of the form our
support will take.
AICPM: [Uti Rogas] No current profit could value the destruction of
our heritage.I fully agree with a statement of support for the Rosia
Montana community. Alburnus Maior should to be saved.
LEC: Absto, once again this item is presented in vague terms. I'd
like to see the "statement of support" on which I would be signing.
If the Consules want to send something in their name, that's their
affair. However, something sent in the name of the Senate and People
of Nova Roma I want to see first. I'm sure that whatever is sent will
be fine, but I'd like to see it before approving it.
PC: VTI ROGAS
LSA: UTI ROGAS