Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Apl 1-5, 2003

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9184 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9185 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9186 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: File - List Guidelines, Main List
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9187 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9188 From: labienus@novaroma.org Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9189 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9190 From: jlasalle Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9191 From: jlasalle Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9192 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9193 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9194 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9195 From: metamorphosis2003 Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9196 From: metamorphosis2003 Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9197 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9198 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Imperium Romanorum website
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9199 From: Hedea Bianchia Dryantilla Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9200 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9201 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9202 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Basic Course about Nova Roma at the Academia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9203 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9204 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Basic Course about Nova Roma at the Academia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9205 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Basic Course about Nova Roma at the Academia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9206 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9207 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Basic Course about Nova Roma at the Academia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9208 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9209 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9210 From: Alejandro Carneiro Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Factiones Symbols Contest (2º call)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9211 From: Daniel O. Villanueva Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Plebeians!!! Less than 3 days left for voting!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9212 From: jlasalle Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9213 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9214 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9215 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: No Hendrix?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9216 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Notitia Dignitatum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9217 From: jlasalle Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9218 From: Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: A new issue of the Roman Times
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9219 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: My internet access
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9220 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9221 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9222 From: labienus@novaroma.org Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9223 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9224 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9225 From: jlasalle Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9226 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Results of the last Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9227 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Invalid Voter Code Message
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9228 From: Franciscus Apulus Caesar Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9229 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9230 From: lanius117@aol.com Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Roman programming for April
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9231 From: Quintus Sertorius Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Oath of Office for Propraetor Canada Occidentalis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9232 From: Pat Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9233 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Roman Britain
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9234 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9235 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9236 From: jlasalle Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9237 From: jlasalle Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9238 From: jlasalle Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9239 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9240 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9241 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Digest N0 526 Re: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9242 From: Daniel O. Villanueva Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Plebeians!!! Only 1(one) day left for voting!!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9243 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Aedilian Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9244 From: Pat Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9245 From: Pat Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Quote of the day
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9246 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Invalid Voter Codes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9247 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Racial prejudice in Rome (WAS: Quote of the day)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9248 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Congratulations!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9249 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9250 From: kerunos Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9251 From: MarcusAudens@webtv.net Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Congratulations!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9252 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9253 From: Iulia Vopisca Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Opening of the Megalensia week
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9254 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9255 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Quote of the day
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9256 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9257 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9258 From: Franciscus Apulus Caesar Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: MEGALESIA LUDI, now open!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9259 From: Franciscus Apulus Caesar Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9260 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: "tried to advance themselves?"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9261 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9262 From: Franciscus Apulus Caesar Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9263 From: nathan guiboche Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Congratulations!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9264 From: nathan guiboche Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Congratulations!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9265 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9266 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9267 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9268 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9269 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9270 From: MarcusAudens@webtv.net Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Roman History
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9271 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9272 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9273 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9274 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9275 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Sources on the Gracchi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9276 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: April Eagle
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9277 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9278 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9279 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9280 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9281 From: labienus@novaroma.org Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9282 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Political Statements or just sensible words?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9283 From: Jim Lancaster Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Racial prejudice in Rome - scattered thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9284 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9285 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9286 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9287 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: G. Iulius Scaurus L. Cornelio Sullae Felici salutem dicit.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9288 From: Michel Loos Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9289 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Respect (WAS: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9290 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: The Gracchi and the end of the Republic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9291 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9292 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9293 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9294 From: curiobritannicus Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: About the Aedilian controversy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9295 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Respect (WAS: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9296 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9297 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: The Gracchi and the end of the Republic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9298 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9299 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9300 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9301 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9302 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Political Statements or just sensible words?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9303 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9304 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration II
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9305 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Racial prejudice in Rome - scattered thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9306 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9307 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9308 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9309 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: New telecomm laws: possible problems
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9310 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Political Statements or just sensible words?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9311 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration II
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9312 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: To the Aediles
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9313 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: To Tribune Sceptivs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9314 From: G.Porticus Brutis Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9315 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Ludi Megalesia - VENATIONES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9316 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: That Aedilian Declaration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9317 From: G.Porticus Brutis Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: That Aedilian Declaration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9318 From: Franciscus Apulus Caesar Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Megalesia affair
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9319 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Ludi Megalesia background
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9320 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9321 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: I'm still here & MEGALESIA LUDI
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9322 From: G.Porticus Brutis Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9323 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9324 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9325 From: G.Porticus Brutis Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9326 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: That Aedilian Declaration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9327 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: To Tribune Sceptivs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9328 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Digest No 529 Re: Political Statements
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9329 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Veto (WAS: Re: Political Statements)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9330 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Racial prejudice in Rome - scattered thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9331 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Megalesia affair
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9332 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9333 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9334 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration II



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9184 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
In a message dated 3/31/03 6:55:50 PM Pacific Standard Time,
alexious@... writes:


> And, Walk this way by Aerosmith was not a Rap song..til Run DMC covered it
> with Aerosmith and subsequently revived them as a viable Rock group. (back
> in 1985)
>
>

R. DMC would disagree with you. Rap started in Philly. Aerosmith simply
popularized a street "jive" into a song. But the meter was rap.

FABIVS


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9185 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, qfabiusmaxmi@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 3/31/03 6:55:50 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> alexious@e... writes:
>
>
> > And, Walk this way by Aerosmith was not a Rap song..til Run DMC
covered it
> > with Aerosmith and subsequently revived them as a viable Rock
group. (back
> > in 1985)
> >
> >
>
> R. DMC would disagree with you. Rap started in Philly. Aerosmith
simply
> popularized a street "jive" into a song. But the meter was rap.
>

Next time I'm using a Ouija board to download the latest Tupac I'll
ask Jam Master Jay.

Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9186 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: File - List Guidelines, Main List
Ex Officio Praetorium

EDICTVM PRAETORICIVM DE MODERATIONE

The praetores of Nova Roma hereby define the guidelines for
appropriate usage of Nova Roma's public communication forum, currently
located at:
Nova_Roma@yahoogroups.com

These guidelines are based on the guidelines previously issued by
our predecessors (Pompeia Cornelia and Patricia Cassia). As praetores
of Nova Roma, though, we keep the right to change these guidelines in
the future.

I. The Nova Roma forum (herein referred to as 'the list') is set up
so that replies will automatically be sent to the entire list. Please
keep this in mind when you are replying. You are not issuing a
private email. If your reply is intended for only one member, and has
no benefit to the rest of the list subscribers, consider sending it
privately.

II. Posts that merely voice agreement with a previous post without
expanding on an issue in any way are discouraged.

III. Please trim your posts. When replying to a thread, snip
unnecessary sections of the original post for brevity, and indicate
where you have done so by printing <snipped> at the appropriate space.
Correct usage of snipping prevents large posts that can quickly fill
subscribers mailboxes

IV. If you feel you must dispute or criticize another person's post,
consider doing so in private.
Sometimes a person makes a genuine mistake, and your gentle correction
via private email means much more to them than potentially
embarrassing them in the forum over what is an innocent error. We know
that during political debates, private exchanges are impractical.
Please use discretion in this area.

V. It is entirely appropriate to disagree publicly with another's
stated views or another's actions as they report such, or with the
actions of Nova Roma's Magistrates, Senate or otherwise appointed
officials.
Nova Roma is an organization of individuals from a wide variety of
nations, religions, cultural backgrounds and political viewpoints, and
it is only reasonable that our views should differ.

Please consider the following when expressing disagreement of opposing
viewpoints:

* Express respect for the person and the entitlement to his opinion,
and faith in his or her good intentions.

* Point out any themes in which you do not agree.

* If in the criticism of a person's actions, perhaps in the capacity
of a magistrate or senator, point out specifically which actions you
are referring to. Quote the message number of the post in
which you base your account and opinions. This makes things more
objective and often helpful to the person in question, as to what,
specifically, you are referring to, and your issues with same.

* In an academic debate, endeavor to offer references to back up your
assertions.

* At all times maintain politeness in the expression of your opinion
and endeavour to respect the rights and opinions of others.

Inappropriate behaviour includes:

the use of profane language; misrepresentation of the truth for the
purpose of making another person look foolish; calling others names;
criticizing a poster's personal character as opposed to criticizing his
ideas; making derrogatory, belittling, subjective statements about the
Gods and Goddesses of Rome (quoting from a myth does not apply) or
belittling deities of other religions for entertainment. Further, in
the interests of those under 18, sexual references must be strictly
within the context of an historical discussion. Otherwise, they are to
be made in private.

The arbitrary advertisment of goods and services (SPAM) is not
permitted on the Nova Roma mainlist, unless the advertiser is a member
of Nova Roma's marketplace, the Macellum. Macellum merchants are
welcome to advertise from time to time in a low-key fashion. This
entails a signature line/file, a one-time announcement of initial
affiliation with the Macellum, advertising in response to a post of
inquiry made in the forum, or an ad once every three months or so
advertising your presence in the Macellum.

VI. If you feel that a post is inappropriate in any way, consider
mailing the individual concerned privately, explaining your rationale
for grievance and asking for clarification"

If you would like to talk to us confidentially about a particular
post, please contact us at praetors@... .

VII: During the time leading up to elections (held each November and
occasionally at other times if offices become vacant) this list is one
of the forums where candidates express their views and present their
qualifications to the populace. All of the strictures governing
appropriate behaviour mentioned hereto, shall remain in place and
apply to all candidates and their supporters.

VIII: Please do not give out personal information (i.e., address or
phone number) to the list. While it would be pleasant to believe we
are all good-hearted and sane, we are not; you cannot trust in that.

IX: Due to the influxes of SPAM and past incidents of posts from
those who wish nothing but to cause disruption and insult to the list,
or particular subscribers of the list, to wit, TROLLS, it has become
necessary to place all new list members on Moderated Status, just
until we are satisfied that such persons are indeed here to celebrate
aspects of Roma Antiquita and Nova Roma, as opposed to being here for
unjustifiable reasons. This is unfortunate, but it has proved
necessary.

X: Language Policies

The forum of Roma Antiquita was a large venue, with people of
different languages conversing, a few in this corner, a few in that
corner.
Rome was a very mulicultured place in her glory. Mind you official
information was in Latin, and in some cases Greek, but people were
free to speak informally as they wished in the language of their
choice.
Our constitution mandates freedom of communication provided it is not
dangerous or disruptive.

Currently, the praetores can understand Latin, Spanish, French,
Italian and Portuguese, so messages in those languages are most
welcome. For other languages, help can be obtained from the decuria of
interpreters of Nova Roma.

Thanks to the decuria of interpreters and to several magistrates or
legates who are willing to assist with list moderation, 'informal'
communication in the forum is open to most main languages. Feel free
to post in English, Latin, Italian, Portugese, Spanish, Fench, German,
Russian, Norwegian, Finnish, Swedish or any Slavik language. The
Praetors have many to thank for efforts in this regard.

***Exception: This does not contravene the Lex Cornelia de Linguis
Publicus
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/lege/index/html
which stipulates, though comitial mandate, that any offical government
legislation or priestly decrees must be issued in English or Latin
where applicable, so they can be translated verbatim into other
languages to be more easily understood by the entirety of the
populace.

XI. Topics of Discussion

The main focus of this list is Nova Roma and Roma Antiqua. However,
as members of a diverse international community we all have lives and
interests outside of Nova Roma. It is perfectly acceptable to discuss
non-Roman topics here, though keep in mind that not everyone may
share your interest in these topics.

XII: The Praetors have the imperium to govern the list, but prefer to
encourage positive interaction as opposed to punishing negative
behaviour. In the case of a poster whose actions violate these
guidelines aforementioned, the following escalated courses of
action shall be taken:

1.- A private memo from the Praetors' office or a Scribal designate,
stating the incident of infarction, and a reminder to review the
guidelines. Often people who are new to the list are not intentionally
trying to upset anybody.

2.- Another private memo as above.

3.- Moderated status (the poster may post but all posts
they issue are first reviewed by the Praetors or their designate).
The length of moderation shall be determined by the number of offences
in the past, the severity of the violation, and the intent to violate.
No citizen shall be kept in moderate status for more than 2 (two)
months
without a firm sentence issued by a legal court as described by the
Lex Salicia Iudiciaria:
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-11-24-iii.html

(For example: Nobody is going to be placed on moderated status for an
extended time for failure to trim posts or for saying 'me too')



Gnaeus Salix Astur,
Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus,
Praetores
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9187 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
LOL interesting....they also claimed that they have never heard of Run DMC before their producer....told them about the song. Rick Rubin was their producer. This is what they stated in Behind the Music, and Ultimate Albums. But, I am not surprised if their story has changed over the years.

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: qfabiusmaxmi@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:


In a message dated 3/31/03 6:55:50 PM Pacific Standard Time,
alexious@... writes:


> And, Walk this way by Aerosmith was not a Rap song..til Run DMC covered it
> with Aerosmith and subsequently revived them as a viable Rock group. (back
> in 1985)
>
>

R. DMC would disagree with you. Rap started in Philly. Aerosmith simply
popularized a street "jive" into a song. But the meter was rap.

FABIVS


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9188 From: labienus@novaroma.org Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
> This is what they stated in Behind the Music...

Was that the series that covered the punk movement without once mentioning the
Dead Kennedys?

TLF
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9189 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
I think that was another documentary...but same channel though. LOL!!

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: labienus@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 1:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:


> This is what they stated in Behind the Music...

Was that the series that covered the punk movement without once mentioning the
Dead Kennedys?

TLF



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9190 From: jlasalle Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
The DK's ruled. I wish a modern metal band would do some covers

-----Original Message-----
From: labienus@... [mailto:labienus@...]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:27 AM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:


> This is what they stated in Behind the Music...

Was that the series that covered the punk movement without once mentioning
the
Dead Kennedys?

TLF



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9191 From: jlasalle Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
http://slate.msn.com/id/1003170/

-----Original Message-----
From: L. Cornelius Sulla [mailto:alexious@...]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:26 AM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:


I think that was another documentary...but same channel though. LOL!!

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: labienus@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 1:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:


> This is what they stated in Behind the Music...

Was that the series that covered the punk movement without once
mentioning the
Dead Kennedys?

TLF



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9192 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
---A Roman Invented Rap.....:)

Marcus Valerius Martialis (known in English as Martial) with the
Epigrams, which were lines of poetry expressing an opinion, either
humorous, sarcasms, or some noteworthy feature...don't have a
dictionary handy, but that's the basic meaning if you look it up.

Uncanny, because Eminem's real name is Martial :)

Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "jlasalle" <jlasalle@s...> wrote:
>
>
> http://slate.msn.com/id/1003170/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: L. Cornelius Sulla [mailto:alexious@e...]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:26 AM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:
>
>
> I think that was another documentary...but same channel though.
LOL!!
>
> Sulla
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: labienus@n...
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 1:27 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:
>
>
> > This is what they stated in Behind the Music...
>
> Was that the series that covered the punk movement without once
> mentioning the
> Dead Kennedys?
>
> TLF
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9193 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
---Hey Basicilius.....wanna battle??....Hollah!!

Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "jlasalle" <jlasalle@s...> wrote:
>
>
> http://slate.msn.com/id/1003170/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: L. Cornelius Sulla [mailto:alexious@e...]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:26 AM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:
>
>
> I think that was another documentary...but same channel though.
LOL!!
>
> Sulla
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: labienus@n...
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 1:27 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:
>
>
> > This is what they stated in Behind the Music...
>
> Was that the series that covered the punk movement without once
> mentioning the
> Dead Kennedys?
>
> TLF
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9194 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
Ave!

Well its Marshall. <g> Marshall Mathers to be more precise.

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: pompeia_cornelia
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 8:54 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?


---A Roman Invented Rap.....:)

Marcus Valerius Martialis (known in English as Martial) with the
Epigrams, which were lines of poetry expressing an opinion, either
humorous, sarcasms, or some noteworthy feature...don't have a
dictionary handy, but that's the basic meaning if you look it up.

Uncanny, because Eminem's real name is Martial :)

Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "jlasalle" <jlasalle@s...> wrote:
>
>
> http://slate.msn.com/id/1003170/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: L. Cornelius Sulla [mailto:alexious@e...]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:26 AM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:
>
>
> I think that was another documentary...but same channel though.
LOL!!
>
> Sulla
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: labienus@n...
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 1:27 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:
>
>
> > This is what they stated in Behind the Music...
>
> Was that the series that covered the punk movement without once
> mentioning the
> Dead Kennedys?
>
> TLF
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9195 From: metamorphosis2003 Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
--Salve Pater :):

Yes. Marshall Mathers, not Martial...whoops!......'or' Marshall
Bruce Mathers III....sounds so formal lol!

I like some of his stuff not all of it.....he's a great lyricist, but
I think he should have kept the Epigrams about his mother away from
the public. Other than that, the man's a master with lyrics and
delivery.

Po


- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@e...>
wrote:
> Ave!
>
> Well its Marshall. <g> Marshall Mathers to be more precise.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: pompeia_cornelia
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 8:54 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
>
>
> ---A Roman Invented Rap.....:)
>
> Marcus Valerius Martialis (known in English as Martial) with the
> Epigrams, which were lines of poetry expressing an opinion,
either
> humorous, sarcasms, or some noteworthy feature...don't have a
> dictionary handy, but that's the basic meaning if you look it up.
>
> Uncanny, because Eminem's real name is Martial :)
>
> Pompeia
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "jlasalle" <jlasalle@s...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > http://slate.msn.com/id/1003170/
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: L. Cornelius Sulla [mailto:alexious@e...]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:26 AM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:
> >
> >
> > I think that was another documentary...but same channel
though.
> LOL!!
> >
> > Sulla
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: labienus@n...
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 1:27 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:
> >
> >
> > > This is what they stated in Behind the Music...
> >
> > Was that the series that covered the punk movement without
once
> > mentioning the
> > Dead Kennedys?
> >
> > TLF
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9196 From: metamorphosis2003 Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
---


Actually, alot of Aerosmith's stuff is rappy.

It's kinda fun to play with words

Pompeia 'takes sharp scissors and snips you sinister synonyms to a
sinful minimal".....(bragging about the line, shamelessly)

Po



In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, qfabiusmaxmi@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 3/31/03 6:36:57 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> richmal@a... writes:
>
>
> > Ok, way off topic, but the first commercially successful rap song
was
> > done by a white woman.
>
> UH UH. "Walk this way" by Aerosmith (1975) is considered the first
Rap song.
>
> I know because Run DMC later covered it, and I worked on that music
video.
>
> Fabivs
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9197 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
Ave!

But he did that on purpose...controversy....every time his name is on the news he sells another 100K records....LOL!! There is no such thing as bad publicity.....or as one of my favorite authors states:

"If you accuse an actor or entertianer of drunkness, drug addiction, etc, it only means you read their biography." (Paraphrased from PJ O'Rourke)

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: metamorphosis2003
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:01 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?


--Salve Pater :):

Yes. Marshall Mathers, not Martial...whoops!......'or' Marshall
Bruce Mathers III....sounds so formal lol!

I like some of his stuff not all of it.....he's a great lyricist, but
I think he should have kept the Epigrams about his mother away from
the public. Other than that, the man's a master with lyrics and
delivery.

Po


- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@e...>
wrote:
> Ave!
>
> Well its Marshall. <g> Marshall Mathers to be more precise.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: pompeia_cornelia
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 8:54 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
>
>
> ---A Roman Invented Rap.....:)
>
> Marcus Valerius Martialis (known in English as Martial) with the
> Epigrams, which were lines of poetry expressing an opinion,
either
> humorous, sarcasms, or some noteworthy feature...don't have a
> dictionary handy, but that's the basic meaning if you look it up.
>
> Uncanny, because Eminem's real name is Martial :)
>
> Pompeia
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "jlasalle" <jlasalle@s...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > http://slate.msn.com/id/1003170/
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: L. Cornelius Sulla [mailto:alexious@e...]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:26 AM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:
> >
> >
> > I think that was another documentary...but same channel
though.
> LOL!!
> >
> > Sulla
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: labienus@n...
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 1:27 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:
> >
> >
> > > This is what they stated in Behind the Music...
> >
> > Was that the series that covered the punk movement without
once
> > mentioning the
> > Dead Kennedys?
> >
> > TLF
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9198 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Imperium Romanorum website
G. Iulius Scaurus S.P.D.

Avete, Quirites.

Here's a link to the "Imperium Romanorum" website of Prof. Clifton R.
Fox (Tomball College):

http://wwwtc.nhmccd.cc.tx.us/people/crf01/rome/

Among the more interesting features of the website are fasti of the
Censores from 280 B.C.E. to 28 B.C.E., fasti of the Consules Ordinarii
from 300 B.C.E. through 68 C.E., a listing of all the emperors from
Augustus to the fall of Constantinople to the Turks, and a genealogy
of the Julio-Claudians (although that genealogy isn't well presented
or particularly easy to interpret given its format).

Valete.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9199 From: Hedea Bianchia Dryantilla Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
hmmm... if I remember the song you're talking about, it definately doesn't
fall into the rap category by today's standards.

--On Tuesday, April 01, 2003 5:01 AM -0500 qfabiusmaxmi@... wrote:

> In a message dated 3/31/03 6:55:50 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> alexious@... writes:
>
>
>> And, Walk this way by Aerosmith was not a Rap song..til Run DMC covered
>> it with Aerosmith and subsequently revived them as a viable Rock group.
>> (back in 1985)
>>
>>
>
> R. DMC would disagree with you. Rap started in Philly. Aerosmith simply
> popularized a street "jive" into a song. But the meter was rap.
>
> FABIVS
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9200 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
I agree.

And, Rap started in Queens, NY too. :) Thats where it all started....It quickly spread to other NY suburbs like South Bronx (from the BDP rap of the same name).

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Hedea Bianchia Dryantilla
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 4:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:


hmmm... if I remember the song you're talking about, it definately doesn't
fall into the rap category by today's standards.

--On Tuesday, April 01, 2003 5:01 AM -0500 qfabiusmaxmi@... wrote:

> In a message dated 3/31/03 6:55:50 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> alexious@... writes:
>
>
>> And, Walk this way by Aerosmith was not a Rap song..til Run DMC covered
>> it with Aerosmith and subsequently revived them as a viable Rock group.
>> (back in 1985)
>>
>>
>
> R. DMC would disagree with you. Rap started in Philly. Aerosmith simply
> popularized a street "jive" into a song. But the meter was rap.
>
> FABIVS
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9201 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
---Ave

You're right Pater. It's just that I thought it was a cheap shot.
Not that I'm saying his mother's lilly pure, but yunno, telling the
whole world your rotten personal appraisal , is, to me, a cheap shot.

Po

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@e...>
wrote:
> Ave!
>
> But he did that on purpose...controversy....every time his name is
on the news he sells another 100K records....LOL!! There is no such
thing as bad publicity.....or as one of my favorite authors states:
>
> "If you accuse an actor or entertianer of drunkness, drug
addiction, etc, it only means you read their biography." (Paraphrased
from PJ O'Rourke)
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: metamorphosis2003
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:01 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
>
>
> --Salve Pater :):
>
> Yes. Marshall Mathers, not Martial...whoops!......'or' Marshall
> Bruce Mathers III....sounds so formal lol!
>
> I like some of his stuff not all of it.....he's a great lyricist,
but
> I think he should have kept the Epigrams about his mother away
from
> the public. Other than that, the man's a master with lyrics and
> delivery.
>
> Po
>
>
> - In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla"
<alexious@e...>
> wrote:
> > Ave!
> >
> > Well its Marshall. <g> Marshall Mathers to be more precise.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: pompeia_cornelia
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 8:54 AM
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
> >
> >
> > ---A Roman Invented Rap.....:)
> >
> > Marcus Valerius Martialis (known in English as Martial) with
the
> > Epigrams, which were lines of poetry expressing an opinion,
> either
> > humorous, sarcasms, or some noteworthy feature...don't have a
> > dictionary handy, but that's the basic meaning if you look it
up.
> >
> > Uncanny, because Eminem's real name is Martial :)
> >
> > Pompeia
> >
> >
> > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "jlasalle" <jlasalle@s...>
wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > http://slate.msn.com/id/1003170/
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: L. Cornelius Sulla [mailto:alexious@e...]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:26 AM
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:
> > >
> > >
> > > I think that was another documentary...but same channel
> though.
> > LOL!!
> > >
> > > Sulla
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: labienus@n...
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 1:27 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:
> > >
> > >
> > > > This is what they stated in Behind the Music...
> > >
> > > Was that the series that covered the punk movement
without
> once
> > > mentioning the
> > > Dead Kennedys?
> > >
> > > TLF
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of
> > Service.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of
> > Service.
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9202 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Basic Course about Nova Roma at the Academia
Salvete Quirites; et salve, senator Sulla.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla"
<alexious@e...> wrote:
> Ave,
>
> Do you really have to spam every list? You might be better served
> just emailing all citizens individually. This way some citizens
> will not get 10 copies of the same email.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla

Unfortunately, this is the only way I know to contact a wide part of
our population. If I could e-mail each citizen directly, I certainly
would, and thus I would avoid all these unnecessary repetitions.

CN·SALIX·ASTVR·T·F·A·NEP·TRIB·OVF
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9203 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
Yep, I agree it is a cheap shot. But it was very lucrative for him to make those cheap shots. (and probably for his mom too, since she ended up suing him).

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: pompeia_cornelia
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:54 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?


---Ave

You're right Pater. It's just that I thought it was a cheap shot.
Not that I'm saying his mother's lilly pure, but yunno, telling the
whole world your rotten personal appraisal , is, to me, a cheap shot.

Po

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@e...>
wrote:
> Ave!
>
> But he did that on purpose...controversy....every time his name is
on the news he sells another 100K records....LOL!! There is no such
thing as bad publicity.....or as one of my favorite authors states:
>
> "If you accuse an actor or entertianer of drunkness, drug
addiction, etc, it only means you read their biography." (Paraphrased
from PJ O'Rourke)
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: metamorphosis2003
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:01 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
>
>
> --Salve Pater :):
>
> Yes. Marshall Mathers, not Martial...whoops!......'or' Marshall
> Bruce Mathers III....sounds so formal lol!
>
> I like some of his stuff not all of it.....he's a great lyricist,
but
> I think he should have kept the Epigrams about his mother away
from
> the public. Other than that, the man's a master with lyrics and
> delivery.
>
> Po
>
>
> - In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla"
<alexious@e...>
> wrote:
> > Ave!
> >
> > Well its Marshall. <g> Marshall Mathers to be more precise.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: pompeia_cornelia
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 8:54 AM
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
> >
> >
> > ---A Roman Invented Rap.....:)
> >
> > Marcus Valerius Martialis (known in English as Martial) with
the
> > Epigrams, which were lines of poetry expressing an opinion,
> either
> > humorous, sarcasms, or some noteworthy feature...don't have a
> > dictionary handy, but that's the basic meaning if you look it
up.
> >
> > Uncanny, because Eminem's real name is Martial :)
> >
> > Pompeia
> >
> >
> > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "jlasalle" <jlasalle@s...>
wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > http://slate.msn.com/id/1003170/
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: L. Cornelius Sulla [mailto:alexious@e...]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:26 AM
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:
> > >
> > >
> > > I think that was another documentary...but same channel
> though.
> > LOL!!
> > >
> > > Sulla
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: labienus@n...
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 1:27 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:
> > >
> > >
> > > > This is what they stated in Behind the Music...
> > >
> > > Was that the series that covered the punk movement
without
> once
> > > mentioning the
> > > Dead Kennedys?
> > >
> > > TLF
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of
> > Service.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of
> > Service.
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9204 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Basic Course about Nova Roma at the Academia
You can, its easy, just a bit time consuming. Just go to the Album Civium and click on each member individually and click the send mail button...and copy and paste your text in and they are emailed.

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Gnaeus Salix Astur
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:55 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Basic Course about Nova Roma at the Academia


Salvete Quirites; et salve, senator Sulla.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla"
<alexious@e...> wrote:
> Ave,
>
> Do you really have to spam every list? You might be better served
> just emailing all citizens individually. This way some citizens
> will not get 10 copies of the same email.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla

Unfortunately, this is the only way I know to contact a wide part of
our population. If I could e-mail each citizen directly, I certainly
would, and thus I would avoid all these unnecessary repetitions.

CN·SALIX·ASTVR·T·F·A·NEP·TRIB·OVF


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9205 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Basic Course about Nova Roma at the Academia
I'll do mass-mailings to any requested and easily-identified group of citizens
(such as "all plebeians" or "all assidui in Hispania") upon request from a
Censor, Consul, Praetor, Tribune, any provincial governor mailing to his own
province, or other magistrates if approved by a senior magistrate.

Vale, Octavius.

> You can, its easy, just a bit time consuming. Just go to the Album Civium and click on each member individually and click the send mail button...and copy and paste your text in and they are emailed.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gnaeus Salix Astur
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:55 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Basic Course about Nova Roma at the Academia
>
>
> Salvete Quirites; et salve, senator Sulla.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla"
> <alexious@e...> wrote:
> > Ave,
> >
> > Do you really have to spam every list? You might be better served
> > just emailing all citizens individually. This way some citizens
> > will not get 10 copies of the same email.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
>
> Unfortunately, this is the only way I know to contact a wide part of
> our population. If I could e-mail each citizen directly, I certainly
> would, and thus I would avoid all these unnecessary repetitions.
>
> CN·SALIX·ASTVR·T·F·A·NEP·TRIB·OVF
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

--
Marcus Octavius Germanicus,
Censor, Consular, Citizen.
http://cynico.net/~hucke/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9206 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
In a message dated 4/1/03 9:25:32 AM Pacific Standard Time,
hedeabianchia@... writes:


> hmmm... if I remember the song you're talking about, it definately doesn't
> fall into the rap category by today's standards.
>
>

You answered your own question. "By today's standards." Like RnR rap
evolved into several sub genres. The rap we hear today is mostly inspired by
"Out of Compton."
The Philly style is not used as much, though you hear it occasionally. The
theme from "Fastlane" for an example.
Right now I'm involved in producing a haircut band, with an '80s sound. We
will see if music is about to go retro again.

--Fabivs


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9207 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Basic Course about Nova Roma at the Academia
Salvete Quirites; et salve, censor Octavi Germanice.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Marcus Octavius Germanicus
<hucke@c...> wrote:
>
> I'll do mass-mailings to any requested and easily-identified group
> of citizens (such as "all plebeians" or "all assidui in Hispania")
> upon request from a Censor, Consul, Praetor, Tribune, any
> provincial governor mailing to his own province, or other
> magistrates if approved by a senior magistrate.
>
> Vale, Octavius.

Thank you, censor.

However, I guess that I will not be a magistrate forever, and I might
very well need to broadcast Academia announcements in the future.

If any of you feels offended by those mails, you have my permission
to erase them without a second thought :-).

CN·SALIX·ASTVR·T·F·A·NEP·TRIB·OVF
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9208 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, qfabiusmaxmi@a... wrote:

> Right now I'm involved in producing a haircut band, with an '80s
sound. We
> will see if music is about to go retro again.
>
> --Fabivs

Why not? Music tends to be cyclical in its evolution. Bob Marley
was singing about killing cops with "I Shot the Sheriff" (which
Clapton cashed in by covering) 18 years before Ice-T/NWA's
controversial "Cop Killer." Another trend in music, black guys
invent it and then "whitey" comes along and cashes in on it.
Elvis.... Clapton.... Vanilla Ice.... Eminem.....

Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9209 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Did a White Iowan Invent Rap Music?
-----Original Message-----
From : pompeia_cornelia <scriba_forum@...>
>
>Uncanny, because Eminem's real name is Martial :)
>
Akchuly you got a point. I /was/ going to say that rap unrecorded must go back to way back when, maybe even to just the kind of accent you get in the West Indies and as well, any recordings/memories of Mohammed Ali-Cassius Clay, if that isn't [a damn side better than rap] what is?
BUT, I do recall hearing a reading of Yevtoshenko. I don't understand Russian but it did occur to me that with their immense conservatism and archaic formed language they probably come closest to the ancient poetry based on long and short syllables. And as well as the stresses, rap depends a lot on the actual length of its syllables, so it might very well have been recognisable to Catullus and Sappho.

Caesariensis.


--
Personalised email by http://another.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9210 From: Alejandro Carneiro Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Factiones Symbols Contest (2º call)
Citizens!

In this moment we have several proposals for the praesina symbol and
one for the veneta. But there aren´t proposals for the flag or symbol
of the albata and the russata.
Please, reds and whites, your factiones need "coats of arms" or... do
you want to continue in the races without a proud flag as the next
one of the greens or blues? ;-)

Look the basis below and create a nice and good symbol for your color.


The Factiones Symbols Contest.

1. Create yours designs on symbols for the factiones and send to
piteas@.... The deadline is 1st April.

2. You can do logos for every factio or only a design for one. The
files can be gif, jpg, bmp or png in higher resolution.

3. All the designs will be showed in the "files" archive of every
factio mailing list during the Ludi Mergalesia (4-10 April) in order
that the members vote the best design for their loved color. In case
of tie, the vote of the Domini will have double value.

The links to the factiones mailing lists are:

Albata: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/factio_albata/
Russata: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/russata/
Veneta: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/factioveneta/
Praesina: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/factiopraesina/

4. The elections of each factio symbol will be only in the mailing
list of each factio.

5. The four more voted symbols will be the official symbols of every
factio of the circus.

6. The authors of the winning designs will be nominated honor members
of the factiones by their Domini.


Salix Galaicus
Caput officinae ludorum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9211 From: Daniel O. Villanueva Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Plebeians!!! Less than 3 days left for voting!!!
Salve Plebeian citizen!



This is just a friendly reminder that the fourth run-off election for the 1(one)

vacant office of Tribunus Plebis is currently in progress! Voting will

continue until Friday April 4th, 18:01 Roman Time, but why wait? Vote now by

going to http://www.novaroma.org and clicking 'VOTE NOW' !



If you don't remember your voter code or are a new citizen, no problem. You

can have your voter code automatically mailed to you by doing the following:

Go to http://www.novaroma.org/bin/view/gentes Find the name of your gens

(they are listed alphabetically). Two columns to the right of your Gens

name, click on the 'number of cives'. A new page opens that contains a

listing of all the citizens in your Gens. Find your name and click on the

link. On the new page you'll see a box which contains information about you.

Click on "Get voter code". On the new page, enter your year of birth and

click 'request voter code'. Your voter code will be emailed to you. Once you

have your voter code, go to http://www.novaroma.org and click 'VOTE NOW'.



Thank you for your participation in this election!



Vale,

Lucius Pompeius Octavianus


Tribunus Plebis



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9212 From: jlasalle Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Ave

"Another trend in music, black guys invent it and then "whitey" comes along
and cashes in on it. Elvis.... Clapton.... Vanilla Ice.... Eminem....."

I take issue with that statement. Modern American music is a combination, a
melting pot, if you will, of different musical styles. Blacks didn't
"invent" jazz, or rock and roll, or rap. The instruments, musical styles and
theories are Western in origin. Saying whitey stole rock and roll from
blackey is about as valid as saying blackie stole the guitar, the half note,
or 4/4 from whitey. As you know, I'm strongly against class divisions, and I
likewise oppose any statements that advance racial division. Jazz, rock, and
rap are uniquely American music that no one person or race can take sole
credit for, and were created by fortuitious meetings of people, places and
times. Likewise, many foriegn artists took jazz to a level never imagined by
their forerunners. Django Rhinehardt and Stephan Grappelli come to mind.

GB Agricola


-----Original Message-----
From: quintuscassiuscalvus [mailto:richmal@...]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:21 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, qfabiusmaxmi@a... wrote:

> Right now I'm involved in producing a haircut band, with an '80s
sound. We
> will see if music is about to go retro again.
>
> --Fabivs

Why not? Music tends to be cyclical in its evolution. Bob Marley
was singing about killing cops with "I Shot the Sheriff" (which
Clapton cashed in by covering) 18 years before Ice-T/NWA's
controversial "Cop Killer." Another trend in music, black guys
invent it and then "whitey" comes along and cashes in on it.
Elvis.... Clapton.... Vanilla Ice.... Eminem.....

Calvus


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9213 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
LOL Well Little Richard will say that Pat Boone sure cashed in on Tootie Fruiti back in the 1950's.

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: jlasalle
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:20 PM
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:



Ave

"Another trend in music, black guys invent it and then "whitey" comes along
and cashes in on it. Elvis.... Clapton.... Vanilla Ice.... Eminem....."

I take issue with that statement. Modern American music is a combination, a
melting pot, if you will, of different musical styles. Blacks didn't
"invent" jazz, or rock and roll, or rap. The instruments, musical styles and
theories are Western in origin. Saying whitey stole rock and roll from
blackey is about as valid as saying blackie stole the guitar, the half note,
or 4/4 from whitey. As you know, I'm strongly against class divisions, and I
likewise oppose any statements that advance racial division. Jazz, rock, and
rap are uniquely American music that no one person or race can take sole
credit for, and were created by fortuitious meetings of people, places and
times. Likewise, many foriegn artists took jazz to a level never imagined by
their forerunners. Django Rhinehardt and Stephan Grappelli come to mind.

GB Agricola


-----Original Message-----
From: quintuscassiuscalvus [mailto:richmal@...]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:21 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, qfabiusmaxmi@a... wrote:

> Right now I'm involved in producing a haircut band, with an '80s
sound. We
> will see if music is about to go retro again.
>
> --Fabivs

Why not? Music tends to be cyclical in its evolution. Bob Marley
was singing about killing cops with "I Shot the Sheriff" (which
Clapton cashed in by covering) 18 years before Ice-T/NWA's
controversial "Cop Killer." Another trend in music, black guys
invent it and then "whitey" comes along and cashes in on it.
Elvis.... Clapton.... Vanilla Ice.... Eminem.....

Calvus


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9214 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-04-01
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "jlasalle" <jlasalle@s...> wrote:
>
> Ave
>
> "Another trend in music, black guys invent it and then "whitey"
comes along
> and cashes in on it. Elvis.... Clapton.... Vanilla Ice....
Eminem....."
>
> I take issue with that statement. Modern American music is a
combination, a
> melting pot, if you will, of different musical styles. Blacks didn't
> "invent" jazz, or rock and roll, or rap.
<snipped>
As you know, I'm strongly against class divisions, and I
> likewise oppose any statements that advance racial division.

Ave,

Chill. Like it or not when one looks at American (USA) music history
there is a distinct trend of African American musicians being way
ahead of their white counterparts in terms of experimentation and
innovation. If you want to know what's going to be cutting edge in 3-
5 years go see what up and coming African American musicians are
doing today. Even the quinsintential wonder bread white "country
music" has its roots in African American music. If there were never
a Jimmi Hendrix there would be no Ozzy. OK some who are Osbourned to
death may argue that would be a good thing....

Vale,

Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9215 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: No Hendrix?
In a message dated 4/1/03 6:52:18 PM Pacific Standard Time, richmal@...
writes:


> . If there were never
> a Jimmi Hendrix there would be no Ozzy. OK some who are Osbourned to
> death may argue that would be a good thing....
>

If there was no Muddy Waters no Jimmy Page,
No Robert Johnson, no Eric Clapton.
No Chicago "Slim" Jim, no David Gilmore.
Tony Iommi was the guitarist of Sabbath, BTW, Ozzy was the chanter.

Fabivs


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9216 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Notitia Dignitatum
G. Iulius Scaurus S.P.D.

Avete, Quirites.

Here's a link to Dr. Ingo Maier's website on the Notitia Dignatatum:

http://members.ozemail.com.au/~igmaier/notitia.htm

The Notitia Dignitatum is a list of the titles, offices, insignia, and
locations of imperial administrative officers and military commanders,
compiled (or, perhaps, last redacted) between 395 and 425 C.E. (there
is persuasive evidence that the accounts of the western and eastern
portions of the empire were not compiled at the same time). The
website includes links to virtually everything about the Notitia
Dignitatum on the net (including a number of editions and
translations), an extraordinary bibliography of the scholarly
literature (including note of cases where a relevant book or journal
article is available online), and an article attempting to identify
the archetype of the cognates of the Codex Spirensis. Students of
later imperial administrative or military history will find Dr.
Maier's website a valuable resource.

Valete, Quirites.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9217 From: jlasalle Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Ave

I am always frosty, brother. However, its not a matter of liking it or not.
The statement is simply not true. Being way ahead doesn't divorce you of
your surroundings. I doubt Africans would have ever developed jazz or rock
and roll if left to their own devices on the sub-continent. They didn't have
guitars, saxaphones, banjos violins etc etc. Didn't look like they ever
going to develop them. And I doubt "whitey" would have developed rock or
jazz if left to their own devices, either. Thats it.

GB Agricola

-----Original Message-----
From: quintuscassiuscalvus [mailto:richmal@...]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 8:35 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "jlasalle" <jlasalle@s...> wrote:
>
> Ave
>
> "Another trend in music, black guys invent it and then "whitey"
comes along
> and cashes in on it. Elvis.... Clapton.... Vanilla Ice....
Eminem....."
>
> I take issue with that statement. Modern American music is a
combination, a
> melting pot, if you will, of different musical styles. Blacks didn't
> "invent" jazz, or rock and roll, or rap.
<snipped>
As you know, I'm strongly against class divisions, and I
> likewise oppose any statements that advance racial division.

Ave,

Chill. Like it or not when one looks at American (USA) music history
there is a distinct trend of African American musicians being way
ahead of their white counterparts in terms of experimentation and
innovation. If you want to know what's going to be cutting edge in 3-
5 years go see what up and coming African American musicians are
doing today. Even the quinsintential wonder bread white "country
music" has its roots in African American music. If there were never
a Jimmi Hendrix there would be no Ozzy. OK some who are Osbourned to
death may argue that would be a good thing....

Vale,

Calvus




Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9218 From: Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: A new issue of the Roman Times
Salve!

The newest issue of the Roman Times is now available at:

http://www.insulaumbra.com/cohors_consulis_cfq/index.html
(choose "Roman Times" from the navigation bar.)

If you would like to contribute to a future issue, please contact me
as soon as possible.

vale bene,
Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9219 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: My internet access
Salvete Quirites!

I am sorry, but my internet access has been cut of for two days. I am
starting to catch up now and expect to be back as usual about Friday
night.
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Consul et Senator
Propraetor Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Consulis CFQ
http://www.insulaumbra.com/cohors_consulis_cfq/
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9220 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
-----Original Message-----
From : quintuscassiuscalvus <richmal@...>

>music“ has its roots in African American music. If there were never
>a Jimmi Hendrix there would be no Ozzy. OK some who are Osbourned to
>death may argue that would be a good thing....
>
Well there would be because Ozzy was around before Marley was ever heard of. And just when did the Kingstown Wailer become and American? Hendrix was Jamaican!

Caesariensis


--
Personalised email by http://another.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9221 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Is it me or did you quote an incorrect passage? The quote you quoted was about Jimmi Hendrix not Bob Marley. Two very gifted and talented musicians but both are very different in musical styles.

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: me-in-@...
To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:


-----Original Message-----
From : quintuscassiuscalvus <richmal@...>

>music" has its roots in African American music. If there were never
>a Jimmi Hendrix there would be no Ozzy. OK some who are Osbourned to
>death may argue that would be a good thing....
>
Well there would be because Ozzy was around before Marley was ever heard of. And just when did the Kingstown Wailer become and American? Hendrix was Jamaican!

Caesariensis


--
Personalised email by http://another.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9222 From: labienus@novaroma.org Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Salve

> Well there would be because Ozzy was around before Marley was ever heard of.
> And just when did the Kingstown Wailer become and American? Hendrix was
> Jamaican!

Um, Jimi Hendrix was born in Seattle. I think you've confused two different
artists, Bob Marley and Jimi Hendrix.

Vale
T Labienus Fortunatus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9223 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
-----Original Message-----
From : “L. Cornelius Sulla“ <alexious@...>
Subject : Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:
Is it me or did you quote an incorrect passage? The quote you quoted was about Jimmi Hendrix not Bob Marley. Two very gifted and talented musicians but both are very different in musical styles.
>
Quite right. For reasons only Dr Freud might understand, I read one and saw the other! Sorry!

Caesariensis.


--
Personalised email by http://another.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9224 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
-----Original Message-----
From : jlasalle <jlasalle@...>

>and roll if left to their own devices on the sub-continent. They didn't have
>guitars, saxaphones, banjos violins etc etc. Didn't look like they ever
>going to develop them. And I doubt ýwhiteyý would have developed rock or
>jazz if left to their own devices, either. Thats it.
>
Neither of that is entirely true. There's some jazz-like stuff in some folk embellishment and Klesma and the Banjo appears to descend from an African instrument. They do have twangy metal things eupemistically called Thumb Piano in the East but I don't know if that went West without whiteskin help. A lot of those Western slave countries are part Muslim - that's where Europeans started buying their slaves - so they have Arab and Mediterranean inspired music but further South the real thing is all rhythm. African music is trendy right now, Yousou N'Dour the Big Name but I can't say I like it or Arab in that sort of genre half as much as Indian.

Caesariensis.



--
Personalised email by http://another.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9225 From: jlasalle Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Ave

Thats very interesting. And it goes to what I'm saying, its all connected.

Agricola

-----Original Message-----
From: me-in-@... [mailto:me-in-@...]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 3:05 PM
To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Re: Quote of the day:


-----Original Message-----
From : jlasalle <jlasalle@...>

>and roll if left to their own devices on the sub-continent. They didn't
have
>guitars, saxaphones, banjos violins etc etc. Didn't look like they ever
>going to develop them. And I doubt ýwhiteyý would have developed rock or
>jazz if left to their own devices, either. Thats it.
>
Neither of that is entirely true. There's some jazz-like stuff in some
folk embellishment and Klesma and the Banjo appears to descend from an
African instrument. They do have twangy metal things eupemistically called
Thumb Piano in the East but I don't know if that went West without whiteskin
help. A lot of those Western slave countries are part Muslim - that's where
Europeans started buying their slaves - so they have Arab and Mediterranean
inspired music but further South the real thing is all rhythm. African music
is trendy right now, Yousou N'Dour the Big Name but I can't say I like it or
Arab in that sort of genre half as much as Indian.

Caesariensis.



--
Personalised email by http://another.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9226 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Results of the last Senate Vote
Tribunus Plebis Lucius Didius Geminus Sceptius Quiritibus SPD

Senate Voting Results published 2 April 2756.

The Senate has finished its latest session and the votes have been tallied as below.

The following 13 Senators cast votes in time. They are referred to below by their initials, and are listed in alphabetical order by nomen:


Caeso Fabius Quintilianus (CFQ)
Lucius Pompeius Octavianus (LPO)
Caius Flavius Diocletianus (CFD)
Gnaeus Salix Astur (GSA)
Marcus Octavius Germanicus (MOG)
Lucius Sergius Australicus Obstinatus (LSAO)
Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus (DIPI)
Titus Labienus Fortunatus (TLF)
Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus (LEC)
Lucius Cornelius Sulla (LCS)
Quintus Fabius Maximus (QFM)
Lucius Sicinius Drusus (LSD)
Appius Tullius Marcellus Cato (ATMC)


The following 7 Senators did not cast a vote [and his absence was not announced or justified in line with the Senatus Consultum defining a quorum (http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2001-07-18-vii.html) and the LEX OCTAVIA DE SENATORIBUS (http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-02-27-iv.html) which this Tribune reads in conjunction]:

- Gaius Marius Merullus (CMM)
- Marcus Arminius Maior (MAM)
- Marcus Cassius Julianus (MCJ)
- Patricia Cassia (PC)
- Antonius Gryllus Graecus (AGG)
- Alexander Iulius Caesar Probus Macedonicus (AICPM)
- Marcus Minucius Audens (MMA)

The necessary majority for a Senatus consultum therefore was 11 votes in favor.

"UTI ROGAS" indicates a vote in favor of an item, "ANTIQUO" or "NEGAT" is a vote against, and "ABSTINEO" is an open abstention. Square Brackets [ ] indicate explanations by the reporting Tribune.


The items for consideration were as follows:


Item I

Aedilian Fund [8 in favor - 3 opposing - 2 abstention / Didn't achieve enough votes for passing.]

I have been asked by the two Curule Aediles to propose the following
Senatus Consultum. The Curile Aediles of last year already founded a
fund. according to their tasks in the Constitution. This years Curule
Aediles are convinced that they would like to formalize a new routine
according to the proposal for a Senatus Consultum below.

************
Senatus Consultum about the Aedilian Fund

I. An Aedilian Fund for donations in favour of the projects handled
by the Aediles Curules is hereby established. This fund will be
maintained as part of the Nova Roma bank account, rather than in a
separate account, because of the following advantages:

a.The donors can be sure that their money is kept in a safe place and
that it will not be kept by the magistrate.
b.People can use money orders and the Nova Roma PayPal account to
make donations in the same way as they pay taxes or make any other
donation to Nova Roma.
c.It will not be necessary to transfer funds to the country in which
the current Aediles Curules live.
d. U.S. residents will have the opportunity to deduct donations on
their taxes. This wouldn't be possible if the bank account was
outside USA.

II. Money contained in the Aedilian Fund can be used only for the
purpose to which they have been expressely donated. As a consequence,
there is no need for the Senate to vote their allocation, as it is
the will of the donors that those funds be spent for specific
projects as defined by the Aediles Curules.

III. The Aedilian Fund is under the Aediles Curules' responsibility.
A detailed record of all donations and their destinations will be
kept by the Quaestores assigned to the Aediles Curules. The
Quaestores will also provide the Consules with a report on the merger
of Lusitania Provincia and Hispania Provincia into one new Provincia
called Hispania Provincia Aedilian Fund to be attached to the
national budget of Nova Roma.

****************


Item II [Passed with 13 in favour - 0 opposing - 0 abstention ]

The Governor of Pannonia Provincia:

I propose that the Senatus appoint Gaius Marcius Coriolanus as
Propraetor of Pannonia Provincia.

CFQ: VTI ROGAS Comments of CFQ: I would glad to see such a competent Propraetor as Gaius Marcius Coriolanus back in the Governor's seat.
LPO: VTI ROGAS
CFD: VTI ROGAS. He shall be prorogued, right? I´m happy to see my friend Coriolanus going into another period of office. Uti Rogas
GSA: VTI ROGAS
MOG: VTI ROGAS
LSAO: VTI ROGAS
DIPI: VTI ROGAS
TLF: VTI ROGAS
LEC: VTI ROGAS
LCS: VTI ROGAS
QFM: VTI ROGAS
LSD: VTI ROGAS
ATMC: VTI ROGAS


Item III [0 in favour - 4 against - 1 abstain - 8 didn't vote]

A new provisional Governor of Mexico Provincia

Gnaeus Salix Astur have been mentioned and have accepted to candidate
when asked.

Item were WITHDRAWN but some Senators casted Votes.


Tribunus Comentarii: A Diplomatic Legate was the solution proposed for this issue instead of a Propraetor. May the Senate find the best solution for a Province like Mexico.

Item IV [ Passed 12 in favour - 0 against - 1 abstain]

A new Governor instead of Remesa Debrasca for Canada Occidentalis Provincia

I propose Honorable Quintus Sertorius as Propraetor of Canada
Occidentalis Provincia.


CFQ: VTI ROGAS Comments of CFQ: I am glad to have Quintus Sertorius back as Propraetor
LPO: VTI ROGAS
CFD: VTI ROGAS
GSA: VTI ROGAS
MOG: VTI ROGAS. Good to see him back with us.
LSAO: VTI ROGAS
DIPI: VTI ROGAS. I am glad to see Quintus Sertorius back and able to serve. He will do well
TLF: VTI ROGAS. It's good to have Q Sertorius back
LEC: ABSTINEO
LCS: VTI ROGAS
QFM: VTI ROGAS. Glad to see him back here in the Republic
LSD: VTI ROGAS. If Quintus Sertorius does half as good a job as he did in the past, he will still be one our best Provincial Praetors
ATMC: VTI ROGAS. I am familiar with the Honorable Quintus Sertorius from communications in the past, and I believe that he is more than qualified for the position and would make an
excellent Propraetor.


Item V [Passed 13 in favour - 0 against - 0 abstain]

A new Governor instead of Pontius Sejanus Marius for America Austroccidentalis Provincia

I propose Honorable Gaius Africanus Secundus Germanicus as Propraetor of America Austroccidentalis Provincia

CFQ: VTI ROGAS. Gaius Africanus Secundus Germanicus has been a magistrate before and I am sure that he as a long-time citizen will become a good Propraetor
LPO: VTI ROGAS
CFD: VTI ROGAS
GSA: VTI ROGAS
MOG: VTI ROGAS. G. Africanus Secundus has been willing to serve for years, and I'm pleased to see him get this position.
LSAO: VTI ROGAS
DIPI: VTI ROGAS
TLF: VTI ROGAS. I sincerely hope he can breathe some life back into my home provincia.

LEC: VTI ROGAS
LCS: VTI ROGAS
QFM: VTI ROGAS. Good man, he has worked hard for this honor
LSD: VTI ROGAS
ATMC: VTI ROGAS


Item VI.

The Eagle subscription fee (20$-30$) [Passed 12 in favour - 0 against - 0 abstain]

The Curator Differum have asked for a higher Eagle subscription fee (not rate ;-) ), which he would be able to set within reasonable limits. I think that this is a very reasonable request.

I propose that Senate give the Curator Differum the right to set a
subscription fee for one year for the Eagle between $20 to $30.


CFQ: VTI ROGAS. Comments of CFQ: I am sure that the Curator Differum will use every cent with care and not set it higher than needed
LPO: VTI ROGAS
CFD: VTI ROGAS. The eagle issue sent to me was very impressive. Professionally edited, with a fine layout and partly coloured. It is worth the fee requested.
GSA: VTI ROGAS
MOG: VTI ROGAS. He's doing a fine job and should be encouraged to keep up the high quality.

LSAO: VTI ROGAS. Comment: I received a new edition of the Eagle this week. It was very well done and worth such a subscription fee. I would not want to see it reduced to a black & white pamphlet by budgetary constraints. It may be that the citizens will not support it, but I think we should try.

DIPI: VTI ROGAS. I agree with Fabius and Cincinnatus, this is too high a range for a newsletter. However, I am willing to let him set the rate and convince subscribers of the value. he might well suceed.
TLF: VTI ROGAS. I'm fairly impressed with what Tiberius Galerius has done with the Eagle so far, and I am therefore willing to give him the leeway necessary for him to test his ideas about how it should be marketed and produced.

LEC: ANTIQVO. As I stated in the discussion, "There is no reason to charge $20 to $30 for a monthly newsletter that needn't be more than 8 pages in black and white. Legio XX has a $5 per year membership fee which includes the 'ADLOCVTIO' newsletter if the twentieth Legio, which is also available online. http://www.larp.com/legioxx/adloc.html " The original Eagle produced by 'Flavia Claudia Iuliana', now Vespasia Pollia Iuliana, was quite good. I have saved every copy of the Eagle since the very first one and I consider her work the best with all due respect to the others who have held that position. I believe that publishing is/was her vocation and she was a professional in every way. In fact she produced multi color edition at no extra costs, although this may have been with the assistance of Marcus Cassius' print shop.

LCS: VTI ROGAS. I have no problem with this as long as he does not seek these funds retroactively from those subscribers who already have paid their subscriptions. We have a duty to provide the same level of quality and service to those who have already paid without retroactively charging them. Besides, there could be legal issues, if the subscribers are retroactively charged.
QFM: VTI ROGAS. The Curator Differum has the right to save the Eagle anyway that he can. That was why he has the post. We must allow every opportunity for he to do so.

LSD: VTI ROGAS. However I am worried that this will place the Eagle beyond the means of many citizens living outside the USA. This is up to two and a half times the tax rate that we indexed for that reason. The Eagle is morphing from a Newsletter into a full fledged magizine, so we may want to consider starting a seperate publication that will serve as a low cost newsletter for citizens who can't afford the higher Eagle prices.

ATMC: VTI ROGAS


Item VII. [Passed 13 in favour - 0 against - 0 abstain]

The merger of Lusitania Provincia and Hispania Provincia into one new
Provincia called Hispania Provincia. This merger will be done
according to the agreement below:

*************
LM LAIETANVS SENATO NOVAROMAE SPD

Salvete Patres et Conscripti.

I've been appointed by honorable Antonius Gryllus Graecus, as
Propraetor of Lusitania, and honorable Caius Iulius Barcinus, as
Propraetor of Hispania to transmit and to submit you our common wish
of union into one and only Novaroman Provincia attending to our
historical roman past.

The idea of a possible union with Lusitania has been suggested in
several occasions for different citizens since the start of the
administrative provincial organization in Hispania more than a year
ago. In the very early debates it became clear how difficult it was
to make any historical reference to the roman Hispania without
including Lusitania.

Illustrious Gryllus, our Pontifex and Propraetor of Lusitania has
been member of Hispania provincial list since we started on and I
must say this has been a great honor for all and that everyone has
always been watchful to his wise and helpful messages.

About three or four months ago, during my propraetorship, my Legatus
Externis Lucius Didius Geminus Sceptius exposed to me and to the
provincial Curia his intention to start working with Propraetor
Gryllus in order to seriously study the chances for a future union
and he got then all our support. During this time he punctually
informed us about the negotiation advances and specially about the
positive reaction of Propraetor Gryllus and the common interest on
this matter both for Lusitania and Hispania. The union proposal was
also debated in the provincial list and a formal declaration in
favour was voted in the Hispania provincial Curia. The support from
the citizens was unanimous.

Since both parts have yet reached to an agreement on the terms of a
possible future union and would like to advance in this way, time has
come to ask for your support and to submit to your approval our
common project.

Vale
L.M. Laietanus

Here are the submitted terms of our agreement:

I- The present novaroman provinces of Lusitania and Hispania firmly
expose their wish of union into one and only novaroman provincia
under the historical common name of Hispania.

II- Within the new Provincia and attending the present linguistic
plurality, its asked equal respect for those citizens who may use
Portuguese or Spanish. However, ours will keep being an open
community which can use any language for its free expression.

III- For those citizens who can't speak Portuguese or Spanish a
Scriba Linguae Lusitanae will be provided in order to help all the
citizens. His duties will be:
A translation of any text asked by the citizens, written either in
Spanish or Portuguese, into the language asked by the citizen.
A translation of the Provincial web-page and articles.
A translation of all the Legal documents of the Province.

IV-The Province will be administrate by a single Propraetor appointed
by the Senate of Novaroma. By this agreement Antonius Gryllus
Graecus, proparetor of Lusitania, renounces to the propraetorship in
favour of Caius Iulius Barcinus, actual propraetor of Hispania. At
the same time Caius Iulius Barcinus publicy express his commitment
with the internal provincial regulations concerning with the annual
renewal of the provincial governor in favour of the candidate
elected by the citizens which will be submitted to the Senate of Nova
Roma at the legal time next year.

V- The present administrative structure, procedures and regulations
of the actual Hispania, based on the plural participation and
continuous improvement will be the base for the future common
development.

VI- To improve the meetings between all the citizens of the Province,
Local Chapters will be created in order to show the reality of the
citizenship geographical distribution. As far as it is possible, the
reference will be the Conventus system (Lusitania, Gallaecia,
Tarraconensis and Carthaginensis).

VII- With the Constitutio of this Province we try to erase the
administrative barriers of our nowadays States, getting back the
Romanitas historical and cultural unity. So the wish of this union is
to be lasting in time for a better achievement of the Nova Roma
purposes and all the Iberian Peninsula. It doesn't mean that we deny
the real world but we have our sight put on further and better times.

VIII. In case that this agreement gets the approval of the Senate, as
we expect to, the union will officially go into effect from next
Kalendas Maias, MMDCCLVI auc

The terms of this agreement have been yet submitted to the following
magistrates which completely agree and fully support them:

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus, Consul
Titus Labienus Fortunatus, Consul
Antonius Gryllus Graecus, Propraetor of Lusitania
Caius Iulius Barcinus, Propraetor of Hispania
Gnaeus Salix Astur, Senator
Lucius Didius Geminus Sceptius, Tribunus
********************************

CFQ: VTI ROGAS. CFQ Comments: The active citizens of the future Provincia have "said" this change is needed, they have my support!

LPO: VTI ROGAS
CFD: VTI ROGAS. Both current governors agreed upon this merger, and it is historical
GSA: VTI ROGAS
MOG: VTI ROGAS. Propraetor Antonius Gryllus has explained the reasons for this, and they are compelling
LSAO: VTI ROGAS. Comment: Questions of historicity aside, the willingness of the citizens in these two provinces to work together to advance the purposes of Nova Roma makes a compelling argument for us to approve the merger
DIPI: VTI ROGAS. As it is the will of the citizens of these provinces, including the propraetor of Lusitania, for this merger to take place, let it happen. I am sad to see one of ouir oldest provinces merge into another but recognize they know their region better than I
TLF: VTI ROGAS
LEC: VTI ROGAS. Since this is the wish and request of the citizens of both Provincia AND it is historical I believe that it is a good thing to do. The best of luck to our cives in Hispania. Bene omnibus nobis.
LCS: VTI ROGAS. My Comments: I share the sentiments of Senator Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus. In addition to his sentiments, I think the door should be left open in the event that the citizens of the provincia wish to go back to the system of having two (or more) provincias in the future
QFM: VTI ROGAS. Illustrious Gryllus, our Pontifex and Propraetor of Lusitania, has convinced me to allow this to go forward. I mourn for the loss of one of our oldest provinces, however, and I hope this "streamling" procedure is not going to be a trend
LSD: VTI ROGAS. I'm reluctant to vote for a measure that includes setting a precedent for a Provincial Praetor being elected. The Provincial Praetors are the Senate's representives to the provinces, not the representive of the citizens of a provincia. Chartering Municipia will give citizens a voice in local affairs in keeping with the Mos Maiorum. I will vote for this as long as it is understood that the selection of Provincial Praetors remains with the Senate, and not with the provinces.
ATMC: VTI ROGAS. This has been well-planned and has a very effective goup of honorable people in charge. I fully approve of this move, and wish them all success in the future with their
plans.



Consul Quintilianus announced that "Items I and III will occur on a later Senate Agenda in a slightly changed form".

vale bene,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
========================
TB·PL·NOVA·ROMA·2756·AUC


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9227 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Invalid Voter Code Message
Salve,

The citizen with the following voter tracking codes
has a malformed or inaccurate voter code:

# 1074

Please remember to enter your code exactly as it is
given, and if you are unsure of your new code, follow
the instructions posted previously to obtain your
current voter code by e-mail:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/5339

Or you may write the censors: censors @ novaroma.org

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Rogator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9228 From: Franciscus Apulus Caesar Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Salvete Omnes,

> Item I
>
> Aedilian Fund [8 in favor - 3 opposing - 2 abstention / Didn't
achieve enough votes for passing.]

Can I know who voted against and why (or didn't vote)?
IMHO I think this is a very important step for our "live" activities
and relations with Public Istitutions, I would like to know what must
to be improved in the item. Please, contact me privately if you
prefer. Thank you very much.

Valete
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Senior Curule Aedile
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9229 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Ave Fr. Apulus et Omnes,

I abstained and I very much leaned for voting against the measure. And, if presented again to the Senate its likely given the more time I have spent thinking about the item that I will vote against it if presented again.

I am extremely hesitant about allowing the a fund to be operated outside of the pervue of the Senate, espeically from the same account. I would like to know the legal ramificaitons of such a venture not only for Nova Roma internally, but its ramificaitons as it would affect our articles of incorporation. The Senate is the supreme policy making body of Nova Roma (according to Article V of the Constitution) and it is the sole financial controlling body for the corporation. I believe that at the very least we should consult a corporate lawyer (if NR would even condone the cost of consulting an attorney) or at the very lease consult a Certified Public Accountant about the possible tax consequences and liabilities that we (as a not for profit corporate entity) could face. Lest I forget to mention the complicated nature with regards to the reporting of funds according to GAAP guidelines (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles).

What I think would be a good compromise is to include an expense account on the general budget for the Aediles. This way they (the Aediles) will have a small budget and if need be they can petition the Senate for additional funds but in this way the financial controls continue to reside with the Senate. However, all fundraising and funds collection must retain within the jurisdictional authority of the Senate of Nova Roma.

Most Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
Senator
----- Original Message -----
From: Franciscus Apulus Caesar
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 3:37 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Results of the last Senate Vote


Salvete Omnes,

> Item I
>
> Aedilian Fund [8 in favor - 3 opposing - 2 abstention / Didn't
achieve enough votes for passing.]

Can I know who voted against and why (or didn't vote)?
IMHO I think this is a very important step for our "live" activities
and relations with Public Istitutions, I would like to know what must
to be improved in the item. Please, contact me privately if you
prefer. Thank you very much.

Valete
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Senior Curule Aedile


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9230 From: lanius117@aol.com Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Roman programming for April
Salvete, omnes

Here are the month's listings for ancient (or not) Roman programs. All times
listed are EDT.

4-17 History Channel The Colosseum 10:00 pm
The Roman Emperors 11:00 pm

4-23 Discovery Channel The Roman Colosseum 8:00 pm and 11:00
pm

4-26 Discovery Channel The Roman Colosseum 1:00 pm

4-27 Discovery Channel Who Killed Julius Caesar? 8:00 pm and 11:00
pm

As usual, if I locate more appropriate programs I shall post them as well.
The Learning Channel website was giving me trouble yesterday, and I want to
try it again.


Vale,

GAIVS LANIVS FALCO
********************************************
Acting Praefectus Sodalitas Egressus Provincia Britannia


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9231 From: Quintus Sertorius Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Oath of Office for Propraetor Canada Occidentalis
03 Apr 03

Salve All

OATH OF OFFICE

I, Quintus Sertorius/Nathan Guiboche do hereby solemnly swear to
uphold the
honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests of the
people
and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Quintus Sertorius/Nathan Guiboche
swear to
honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to
pursue
the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Quintus Sertorius/Nathan Guiboche swear to uphold and defend the
Religio
Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in
a
way
that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I Quintus Sertorius/NathanGuiboche swear to protect and defend the
Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Quintus Sertorius/Nathan Guiboche further swear to fulfill the
obligations and responsibilities of the office of Propraetor for
Canada
Occidentalis to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the
Gods and
Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I
accept the
position of Propraetor for Canada Occidentalis and all the rights,
privileges,
obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.

Vale

Quintus Sertorius
Propraetor
Canada Occidentalis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9232 From: Pat Date: 2003-04-02
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Ave,

GB Agricola wrote:

>I doubt Africans would have ever developed jazz or rock
>and roll if left to their own devices on the sub-continent.

Sub?

>They didn't have guitars, saxaphones, banjos violins etc etc.

Europe got the guitar when the oud (or ud, pick your transliteration) was
modified into the European lute, which mutated into the guitar. Lacking
the Arabs, thus, we'd never have seen rock and roll.

I seem to recall that the banjo has a less than, um...Aryan... lineage, too.

WGASA?

>Didn't look like they ever
>going to develop them. And I doubt "whitey" would have developed rock or
>jazz if left to their own devices, either. Thats it.

One thing that Rome was well ahead on was not really caring what shade
one's skin was, or whether one's ancestry was "pure" anything. We Novans
might do well to emulate it more.

There is much that modern music has inherited from all over the
world. Didjeridoos are showing up in modern Celtic music, just for
example. The streams of many nations flow together, and what shows up in
the delta of that confluence is pretty complex stuff.

Vale,

Marcus Umbrius


"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false-face for the urge to
rule it."
-- H. L. Mencken --
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9233 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Roman Britain
G. Iulius Scaurus S.P.D.

Avete, Quirites.

Here's a link to the "Roman Britain" website of the historian and
archaeologist Guy de la BŽdoyre:

http://www.bedoyere.freeserve.co.uk/

The website includes a catalogue of gods and goddesses attested by
inscriptions from Roman Britain, discussions of legionary and auxilia
units (with catalogues of extant evidence from epigraphic and
literary sources), a catalogue of inscriptions in stone from RIB, and
selections from his books and articles.

Valete.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9234 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
G. Iulius Scaurus Marco Umbrio salutem dicit.

Salve, Marce Umbri.

Scripsisti:

> One thing that Rome was well ahead on was not really caring what shade
> one's skin was, or whether one's ancestry was "pure" anything. We
Novans
> might do well to emulate it more.

Unfortunately this impression about ancient Rome, largely a result of
the popularity of A.N. Sherwin-White's _Racial Prejudice in Imperial
Rome_ (Cambridge, 1967), the Gray lecture of 1966, a time in which a
more hopeful example of race relations was being eagerly sought by
much of the Anglophone world, has not been supported by more recent
research. There have been a number of studies of racial/colour
attitudes in iconography and in personal and commerical relations
(particularly from analysis of the large collection of papyri from
Roman Egypt) which suggest that a significant portion of the imperial
citizens and subjects who have left artifacts for scholarship to
examine had racial/colour prejudices.

Best wishes,

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9235 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
G. Iulius Scaurus L. Cornelio Sullae Felici salutem dicit.

Salve, Luci Corneli.

At the risk of being entirely too flipant...

>However, all fundraising and funds collection must retain within the
jurisdictional >authority of the Senate of Nova Roma.

Wasn't that the principle over which Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus was
killed?

Lex de provincia Asia in the concilium plebis and all that :-).

Vale.

G. Iulius Scurra... er... Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9236 From: jlasalle Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Ave Umbrius

My point is that no one race can claim birth rights for jazz, or rock, or
whatever. Its all inter-related. That comes from my buddhist and masonic
training. What is a flower, without the earth, water, the sun? It can't
exist. You cannot claim the flower exists independently from, or is better
than, those elements, or that one is more valuable than the other, or
spontaneously sprung up on its own.

What would the Romans be without the Etruscans, Greeks, Sabines etc?
Certainly they took elements from those cultures and made something unique
and distinctly Roman. But I would never say they "stole" it, or that they
were better than the cultures that influenced them.

Agricola

-----Original Message-----
From: Pat [mailto:pmcl@...]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:39 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Quote of the day:



Ave,

GB Agricola wrote:

>I doubt Africans would have ever developed jazz or rock
>and roll if left to their own devices on the sub-continent.

Sub?

>They didn't have guitars, saxaphones, banjos violins etc etc.

Europe got the guitar when the oud (or ud, pick your transliteration) was
modified into the European lute, which mutated into the guitar. Lacking
the Arabs, thus, we'd never have seen rock and roll.

I seem to recall that the banjo has a less than, um...Aryan... lineage,
too.

WGASA?

>Didn't look like they ever
>going to develop them. And I doubt "whitey" would have developed rock or
>jazz if left to their own devices, either. Thats it.

One thing that Rome was well ahead on was not really caring what shade
one's skin was, or whether one's ancestry was "pure" anything. We Novans
might do well to emulate it more.

There is much that modern music has inherited from all over the
world. Didjeridoos are showing up in modern Celtic music, just for
example. The streams of many nations flow together, and what shows up in
the delta of that confluence is pretty complex stuff.

Vale,

Marcus Umbrius


"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false-face for the urge to
rule it."
-- H. L. Mencken --


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9237 From: jlasalle Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
"Wasn't that the principle over which Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus was
killed?"

Yes

Agricola

-----Original Message-----
From: Gregory Rose [mailto:gfr@...]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:29 AM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Results of the last Senate Vote


G. Iulius Scaurus L. Cornelio Sullae Felici salutem dicit.

Salve, Luci Corneli.

At the risk of being entirely too flipant...

>However, all fundraising and funds collection must retain within the
jurisdictional >authority of the Senate of Nova Roma.

Wasn't that the principle over which Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus was
killed?

Lex de provincia Asia in the concilium plebis and all that :-).

Vale.

G. Iulius Scurra... er... Scaurus



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9238 From: jlasalle Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Ave



So if I plan, execute, and collect money on a fundraiser, and deposit that
money in a trust account, and then transfer that money to NR, what happens
then? I have to get approval from the senate to do so? Will they refuse the
money? You have to guard against the Republic from being too top heavy, and
micro-managing. I say business is where you find it.



Agricola

-----Original Message-----
From: L. Cornelius Sulla [mailto:alexious@...]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 5:51 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Results of the last Senate Vote


Ave Fr. Apulus et Omnes,

I abstained and I very much leaned for voting against the measure. And,
if presented again to the Senate its likely given the more time I have spent
thinking about the item that I will vote against it if presented again.

I am extremely hesitant about allowing the a fund to be operated outside
of the pervue of the Senate, espeically from the same account. I would like
to know the legal ramificaitons of such a venture not only for Nova Roma
internally, but its ramificaitons as it would affect our articles of
incorporation. The Senate is the supreme policy making body of Nova Roma
(according to Article V of the Constitution) and it is the sole financial
controlling body for the corporation. I believe that at the very least we
should consult a corporate lawyer (if NR would even condone the cost of
consulting an attorney) or at the very lease consult a Certified Public
Accountant about the possible tax consequences and liabilities that we (as a
not for profit corporate entity) could face. Lest I forget to mention the
complicated nature with regards to the reporting of funds according to GAAP
guidelines (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles).

What I think would be a good compromise is to include an expense account
on the general budget for the Aediles. This way they (the Aediles) will
have a small budget and if need be they can petition the Senate for
additional funds but in this way the financial controls continue to reside
with the Senate. However, all fundraising and funds collection must retain
within the jurisdictional authority of the Senate of Nova Roma.

Most Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
Senator
----- Original Message -----
From: Franciscus Apulus Caesar
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 3:37 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Results of the last Senate Vote


Salvete Omnes,

> Item I
>
> Aedilian Fund [8 in favor - 3 opposing - 2 abstention / Didn't
achieve enough votes for passing.]

Can I know who voted against and why (or didn't vote)?
IMHO I think this is a very important step for our "live" activities
and relations with Public Istitutions, I would like to know what must
to be improved in the item. Please, contact me privately if you
prefer. Thank you very much.

Valete
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Senior Curule Aedile


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9239 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
-----Original Message-----
From : Gregory Rose <gfr@...>
>
>>research. There have been a number of studies of racial/colour
>attitudes in iconography and in personal and commerical relations
>(particularly from analysis of the large collection of papyri from
>Roman Egypt) which suggest that a significant portion of the imperial
>citizens and subjects who have left artifacts for scholarship to
>examine had racial/colour prejudices.
>
Can we be sure these were racial or a general order of increasing cultural contempt? We never hear of Iugurtha or Iuba referred to as other than kings of roughly Hellene type, unlike the various northern Barbarians. I'd be particularly wary if the study was done in England because in my experience, the English do have a tendency to very similar xenophobia that is often mistaken for colour racism. The colour makes it easier to indentify but I think that, like the Romans, there is more of a sense of cultural superiority to anybody, not of a true racism such as might have reluctantly accepted eg Colin Powell in his present position but still refused him access to the same amenities as Pinkskins, that you would have had in the old South Africa and USA. There were certainly sub-saharan civilisations at the time and trade with them, Benin mostly, but how much Rome knew about that and them is a different matter!

Caesariensis.

“The idea of God is the sole wrong for which I cannot forgive
mankind.“ De Sade.



--
Personalised email by http://another.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9240 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Ave!

Not exactly, you forget what really got Ti Sempronius Gracchus killed was not only his manipulations of the traditions of the Republic but it was also his quest for Land Reform and breaking up the estates of the Senators and other members of the First Class.

Respectfully,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Gregory Rose
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 1:29 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Results of the last Senate Vote


G. Iulius Scaurus L. Cornelio Sullae Felici salutem dicit.

Salve, Luci Corneli.

At the risk of being entirely too flipant...

>However, all fundraising and funds collection must retain within the
jurisdictional >authority of the Senate of Nova Roma.

Wasn't that the principle over which Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus was
killed?

Lex de provincia Asia in the concilium plebis and all that :-).

Vale.

G. Iulius Scurra... er... Scaurus



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9241 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Digest N0 526 Re: Re: Quote of the day:
Lucius Equitius Omnibus SPD

I believe this subject was brought forth quite some time ago, years perhaps,
on this list and not necessarily concerning musical development. Anyway, for
a good source on ancient Roman views on race. See:
Before Color Prejudice, the Ancient View of Blacks, by Frank M. Snowden, Jr.
Harvard University Press
ISBN 0-674-06381-3

Valete
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 13
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 19:01:03 +0100 (BST)
From: me-in-@...
Subject: Re: Re: Quote of the day:

-----Original Message-----
From : Gregory Rose <gfr@...>
>
>>research. There have been a number of studies of racial/colour
>attitudes in iconography and in personal and commerical relations
>(particularly from analysis of the large collection of papyri from
>Roman Egypt) which suggest that a significant portion of the imperial
>citizens and subjects who have left artifacts for scholarship to
>examine had racial/colour prejudices.
>
Can we be sure these were racial or a general order of increasing cultural
contempt? We never hear of Iugurtha or Iuba referred to as other than kings
of roughly Hellene type, unlike the various northern Barbarians. I'd be
particularly wary if the study was done in England because in my experience,
the English do have a tendency to very similar xenophobia that is often
mistaken for colour racism. The colour makes it easier to indentify but I
think that, like the Romans, there is more of a sense of cultural
superiority to anybody, not of a true racism such as might have reluctantly
accepted eg Colin Powell in his present position but still refused him
access to the same amenities as Pinkskins, that you would have had in the
old South Africa and USA. There were certainly sub-saharan civilisations at
the time and trade with them, Benin mostly, but how much Rome knew about
that and them is a different matter!

Caesariensis.

"The idea of God is the sole wrong for which I cannot forgive
mankind." De Sade.



--
Personalised email by http://another.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9242 From: Daniel O. Villanueva Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Plebeians!!! Only 1(one) day left for voting!!!!
Salvete omnes plebeii

English.

Tomorrow voting ends!. This will be the last run off election if all plebeians vote. Come on cives plebeii!!!. Less than 24 hours left ahead!!. Don't miss your oportunity to cast your vote!!.

Spanish.

Mañana termina la votación!. Esta será la última vuelta si todos los plebeyos votan. Vamos cives plebeii!!!. Quedan menos de 24 horas para votar!!!. No pierdan la oportunidad de emitir sus votos!!

Bene valete
Lucius Pompeius Octavianus
Tribunus Plebis



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9243 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Aedilian Fund
Salvete Quirites!

The reason that the Aedilian Fund wasn't approved of in the Senate
was not a _few_ Senators voting again the proposal.

I argued against the objections of a few and tried to answer a few
questions. Here I repeat this my aruments.

Item I
Aedilian Fund

Is it Constitutional?

The Constitution IV A.6.

"Quaestor. A number of quaestors shall be elected by the comitia
populi tributa equal to the number of consuls, praetors, and aediles
to serve a term lasting one year. One quaestor shall be assigned to
each of these magistrates by mutual agreement or, if such cannot be
made, by decision of the newly-elected consuls. They shall have the
power and obligation to administer those funds that shall be
allocated to them by the Senate in its annual budget under the
supervision of that magistrate to whom they are assigned. Those
quaestors assigned directly to the consuls shall supervise the whole
of the aerarium (treasury), but no funds may be spent without the
prior approval of the Senate."

It seems very clear that this is constitutional: "They shall have the
power and obligation to administer those funds that shall be
allocated to them by the Senate in its annual budget under the
supervision of that magistrate to whom they are assigned." This is
exactly what the Aedilian fund is about. It is of course possible for
the Senate to allocate those donations that are meant to go to the
Aedilian projects to the Aedilian fund. It is clearly the intention
of the Constitution to make it possible to "to split up the treasury
into sections each under the control of a magistrate". Even though I
have the impression that this is intended to only concern limited
projects.

Still I also think that the control of the Treasury is fundamental to
the power of the Senate and I am going to propose measures to
strengthen the Senate's grip during the autumn. But to have funds
under different magistrati according to the Constitution should be
_no_ problem. If following the Constitution is a "terrible
precedents", then I don't know where we would be heading. Still I am
sure that most Senatores don't see any problem with this.

As far as I have understood we have since long mixed donations with
tax money in the Treasury. But in this case the Aedilian fund will be
separately accounted for.

The reason to have a special fund within the Treasury for the
Aedilian fund is mostly practical as can be seen in the S.C. PayPal
can be used and we could do some tax deduction.

The project that already has gathered some money is the "Restoring of
the Temple of Magna Mater Project" and the Aediles have the intention
to work with the "Herculaneum Lost Library Fund/Papyrus Villa
Project" too. It is such projects that the Aedilian funds are meant
for. This according to the spirit of Constitution. IV.A.4.b. "...to
see to the maintenance of any real public facilities that the State
should acquire,". To protect and "develop" such "public" places could
easiely be seen as the duty of the Aediles.

I think that there may be enough support in the Senate for the
Aedilian Fund next time I put it forward.
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Consul et Senator
Propraetor Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Consulis CFQ
http://www.insulaumbra.com/cohors_consulis_cfq/
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9244 From: Pat Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
>
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>________________________________________________________________________
>
>Wasn't that the principle over which Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus was
>killed?
>
>Lex de provincia Asia in the concilium plebis and all that :-).
>
>Vale.
>
>G. Iulius Scurra... er... Scaurus

Pretty good company to keep, all in all, I suppose.

M. Umbrius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9245 From: Pat Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Quote of the day
(apologies, Gaius Scaurus, my command of Latin allows me to glean a fair
bit of what's written--but not to write even a decent salutation. My brain
freezes up with everything conjugating furiously, like something envisioned
by Fellini.... I admire your usage, and hope that one of these days I
understand enough to properly wade in...)

Salve, G. Iulio Scauro

Scripsisti:

(I can be taught)

> > One thing that Rome was well ahead on was not really caring what shade
> > one's skin was, or whether one's ancestry was "pure" anything. We Novans
> > might do well to emulate it more.

<snip>

>There have been a number of studies of racial/colour
>attitudes in iconography and in personal and commerical relations
>(particularly from analysis of the large collection of papyri from
>Roman Egypt) which suggest that a significant portion of the imperial
>citizens and subjects who have left artifacts for scholarship to
>examine had racial/colour prejudices.

Gods forfend that I leave the impression that I suffered the delusion that
the Romans were free of prejudices.

I simply haven't seen anything that suggests that Roman "race"/color
prejudices were as extreme as those which have tainted the modern world.

If you have links (or references that you could cite) that might indicate
how bad this was in Rome, I'd be most interested.

My impression is simply that Romans were not, on average, as
color-conscious and as prejudiced on "racial" grounds.

One would assume, for example, that the darker Italic skin would have made
the simplistic Black-White spectrum a non-starter. After all, the paler
Celts and Teutonic peoples were (no doubt) inferior to Romans, as much as
Greeks, Carthaginians, Nubians and so forth.

(Don't take lack of response to mean anything; I am taking my family and
fleeing the charming news of the day for a week or so in the mountains of
America Austroccidentalis.)

Vale,

M. Umbrius Ursus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9246 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Invalid Voter Codes
Salve,

Invalid Voter Code Message:

The citizen with the following voter tracking codes
has a malformed or inaccurate voter code:

# 1104 and 1106

Please remember to enter your code exactly as it is
given, and if you are unsure of your new code, follow
the instructions posted previously to obtain your
current voter code by e-mail:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/5339

Or you may write the censors: censors @ novaroma.org

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9247 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Racial prejudice in Rome (WAS: Quote of the day)
A. Apollonius Cordus to all citizens and peregrines,
greetings.

I don't know much about this topic, and I'm not as
widely read in Roman matters as many citizens, but I
can think off the top of my head of one example of
fairly clear racial (not cultural) prejudice on the
part of a Roman intellectual: Ammianus Marcellinus
(I'm not at home so I can't look up the reference, I'm
afraid), when he recounts the first appearance of the
Huns in the 370s AD, refers in openly disgusted manner
to their block-like heads and other physical
characteristics.

However, this was a long time after the republican
period, and was the first time Romans had seen any
members of an East Asian ethnic group, so it must have
been genuinely surprising for them - and probably for
the Huns as well. Also, some scholars have suggested
that the Huns may have practised forms of ritual
self-mutilation which would have made them look
alarming by any standards.

I can't think of any examples of Roman bias against
people on account of their actual skin colour. Romans
did pass comment on physical characteristics of
different races, such as the stature and complexions
of the Gauls, but not usually in such a way as to
suggest that different physical characteristics meant
inferiority.

Now, I'll tell you a genuinely remarkable thing, as a
prize for the one or two people who've toiled through
my foregoing waffle: The ancient Chinese very probably
looked physically different from some of their
neighbours, and almost certainly spoke a different
language, yet their literature pays no attention to
these differences at all. When ambassadors went abroad
to talk to foreign peoples, we know from one or two
stray references that they needed interpreters, but
writers represent them as talking directly to the
foreigners, like the wonderful way in Star Wars that
the humans address the aliens in English and the
aliens respond in strange gooey noises with subtitles.
And there's no suggestion from ancient Chinese
literature that non-Chinese people looked odd or
strange - the evidence for different ethnic groups is
all non-literary. See Burton Watson, 'Ssu-ma Ch'ien:
Grand Historian Of China', somewhere in chapter 1.

Cordus

=====


www.strategikon.org


__________________________________________________
Yahoo! Plus
For a better Internet experience
http://www.yahoo.co.uk/btoffer
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9248 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Congratulations!
Salve Illustrus Quintus Sertorius!

I warmly congratulate You to your appointment as Propraetor of Canada
Occidentalis Provincia! I am sure that You will develop it to a
strong and flourishing Provincia! Good Luck!
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Consul et Senator
Propraetor Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Consulis CFQ
http://www.insulaumbra.com/cohors_consulis_cfq/
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9249 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 07:01:03PM +0100, me-in-@... wrote:
>
> I'd be particularly wary if the study was done in England
> because in my experience, the English do have a tendency to very
> similar xenophobia that is often mistaken for colour racism. The
> colour makes it easier to indentify but I think that, like the Romans,
> there is more of a sense of cultural superiority to anybody, not of a
> true racism such as might have reluctantly accepted eg Colin Powell in
> his present position but still refused him access to the same
> amenities as Pinkskins

*That* sounds like straight-out racism. Would you care to explain why
you chose to insult a group of people based on the color of their skin,
or would you just prefer to apologize?


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Omnia mutantur, nihil interit.
Everything changes, nothing perishes.
-- Ovid, "Metamorphoses"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9250 From: kerunos Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Ave

>>I'd be particularly wary if the study was done in England because
in my experience, the English do have a tendency to very similar
xenophobia that is often mistaken for colour racism>>

In my experience (as a historian), this is in fact not the case.
However, being English I admit I might have a biased opinion! :)

On another note, I am trying to contact Annia Lucilla Aurelia,
Materfamilias of Gens Lucilla with regards to an application for
citizenship but dont have a valid email address as that given in the
Album Gentium appears out of date....

Respectfully

Mike McMillan
Britannia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9251 From: MarcusAudens@webtv.net Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Congratulations!
Congratulations Quintus Sertorius;

May the days of your Praetorship be crowned with success!!!!

Respectfully;
Marcus Minucius Audens

A wet sheet and a flowing sea, and a wind follows fast, and fills the
white and rustling sail, and bends the gallant mast; and bends the
gallant mast my boys while like the eagle free, our good ship starts and
flies and leaves old England on our lee------Fair Winds and following
Seas!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9252 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
G. Iulius Scaurus L. Cornelio Sullae Felici salutem dicit.

Salve, Luci Corneli.

Scripsisti:

> Not exactly, you forget what really got Ti Sempronius Gracchus
killed was not only his manipulations of the traditions of the
Republic but it was also his quest for Land Reform and breaking up the
estates of the Senators and other members of the First Class.

While I was actually making a joke, there was a historical point in my
remark. I contend that Senatorial violence against T. Sempronius
Gracchus would never have occurred if T. Sempronius hadn't found a
practical way to implement the land reform by using a plebscite to
allocate the funds made available by the creation of the province of
Asia to that purpose. What T. Sempronius did was involve the plebs
both in foreign policy (the bequest of the king of Pergamum of what
became the province of Asia to Rome) and in the allocation of state
funds, both areas in which the Senate had hitherto had virtually
unilateral control, and he did so without following the precedent of
seeking a senatus consultum prior to presenting legislation to the
concilium plebis, It was only after he end-ran the Senate to provide
the funds for the land reform (and thrust the plebs into foreign
policy to do it*) that he became a mortal threat to the Senatorial
elite; without those funds his land reform bill would have gone
nowhere. David Stockton's treatment of these issues in _The Gracchi_
(Oxford, 1979) seems to me persuasive.

Vale.

G. Iulius Scaurus

*Recall how the near-contemporary Polybius characterised it: "pr˜s d
t˜v dmon kath‡pax oudŽn esti t™v proeiremŽnon" (sorry, I don't know
the html for the breathing-marks and Yahoo isn't displaying my usual
Greek font).
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9253 From: Iulia Vopisca Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Opening of the Megalensia week
SALVETE OMNES!

I make this prayer of offering to Cybele, Great Idaean Mother of the Gods, to commemorate the opening of Her sacred festival week, the Megalensia!

SALVE MATER DEVM MAGNA IDAEA
SALVE O DEA MAIOR SANCTISSIMA
TE PRECOR BONAS PRECES O CYBELE
BERECYNTHIA MATER DINDYMENE
TE QVAESO IN CVSTODELAM NOS TVAM
VTINAM RECIPIAS ET TVTERE
TIBI OFFERO HANC ORATIONEM
VT DES PACEM PROPITIA SALVTEM
ET SANITATEM NOSTRAE FAMILIAE
VTI SIS VOLENS PROPITIA NOBIS
ET NVNQVAM DESOLES LIBEROS TVOS


Translation is provided, with more images and information, at the link below:

http://www.aztriad.com/cybele.html

and a bit of history at:

http://www.aztriad.com/nrcybele.html

OPTIME VALETE IN LVCE MATRIS MAGNAE ....



PACEM VENIAMQVE DEORVM TIBI EXOPTET IVLIA VOPISCA

http://www.aztriad.com/cybeleix.html

* MATRIS DEVM MAGNAE IDEAEAE SACERDOS FILIAQVE *



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9254 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Ave G. Iulius,

I understand your response was a joke. I actually had two responses for your post...I sent the one that was a bit more serious in tone. My other response was definately more lighthearted in nature.

Yes, I am aware of the precedent that Tribune T. Sempronius was setting during his tenure as Tribune of the Plebs, as you can probably tell by my Roman name, I do not hold the Sempronii in the highest esteem. I view them as politicans pure and simple who tried to manipulate the system for their own gain.

I also recommend Mommsen's work on the Late Roman Republic and Scullard's From the Gracchi to Nero: A History of Rome from 133 BC to 68 AD as well.

Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
----- Original Message -----
From: Gregory Rose
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 6:03 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Results of the last Senate Vote


G. Iulius Scaurus L. Cornelio Sullae Felici salutem dicit.

Salve, Luci Corneli.

Scripsisti:

> Not exactly, you forget what really got Ti Sempronius Gracchus
killed was not only his manipulations of the traditions of the
Republic but it was also his quest for Land Reform and breaking up the
estates of the Senators and other members of the First Class.

While I was actually making a joke, there was a historical point in my
remark. I contend that Senatorial violence against T. Sempronius
Gracchus would never have occurred if T. Sempronius hadn't found a
practical way to implement the land reform by using a plebscite to
allocate the funds made available by the creation of the province of
Asia to that purpose. What T. Sempronius did was involve the plebs
both in foreign policy (the bequest of the king of Pergamum of what
became the province of Asia to Rome) and in the allocation of state
funds, both areas in which the Senate had hitherto had virtually
unilateral control, and he did so without following the precedent of
seeking a senatus consultum prior to presenting legislation to the
concilium plebis, It was only after he end-ran the Senate to provide
the funds for the land reform (and thrust the plebs into foreign
policy to do it*) that he became a mortal threat to the Senatorial
elite; without those funds his land reform bill would have gone
nowhere. David Stockton's treatment of these issues in _The Gracchi_
(Oxford, 1979) seems to me persuasive.

Vale.

G. Iulius Scaurus

*Recall how the near-contemporary Polybius characterised it: "pr~s d
t~v dmon kath?pax oudZn esti tTv proeiremZnon" (sorry, I don't know
the html for the breathing-marks and Yahoo isn't displaying my usual
Greek font).




Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9255 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-03
Subject: Re: Quote of the day
G. Iulius Scaurus M. Umbrio Urso salutem dicit.

Salve, Marce Umbri.

Scripsisti:

> I simply haven't seen anything that suggests that Roman "race"/color
> prejudices were as extreme as those which have tainted the modern world.
>
> If you have links (or references that you could cite) that might
indicate
> how bad this was in Rome, I'd be most interested.
>
> My impression is simply that Romans were not, on average, as
> color-conscious and as prejudiced on "racial" grounds.
>
> One would assume, for example, that the darker Italic skin would
have made
> the simplistic Black-White spectrum a non-starter. After all, the paler
> Celts and Teutonic peoples were (no doubt) inferior to Romans, as
much as
> Greeks, Carthaginians, Nubians and so forth.
America Austroccidentalis.)

I'm not at all certain that is it possible from the sources to compare
with any real precision the degree of racial prejudice in today's
world and the Roman world. My point was that the impression that
Roman society was relatively colour-blind, as Sherwin-White suggested.
has not been borne out by more recent scholarship. A taste of the
sort of scholarship to which I am referring can be obtained from:

Gay L. Byron, _Symbolic Blackness and Ethnic Difference in Early
Christian Literature_ (London, 2002) -- Byron also presents a great
deal of Graeco-Roman pre-Christian and Pagan evidence.

Robert E.Hood, _Begrimed and Black: Christian Traditions on Blacks and
Blackness_ (Minneapolis, 1994) -- Like Byron, Hood has useful material
on pre- and non-Christian attitudes.

Robert Garland, _The Eye of the Beholder: Deformity and Disability in
the Greco-Roman World_ (Ithaca, 1995).

David Noy, _Foreigners at Rome: Citizens and Strangers_ (London, 2000).

Stephen Mitchell and Geoffrey Greatrex, eds., _Ethnicity and Culture
in Late Antiquity_ (London, 2000).

Derek A. Welsby, _The Medieval Kingdoms of Nubia: Pagans, Christians
and Muslims along the Middle Nile_ (London, 2002) -- this has a
greater amount of evidence from antiquity than the title suggests.

I'm sorry, but I don't know of any websites that treat this issue in a
scholarly way. I hope these citations will be helpful.

Vale.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9256 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Salve

Sulla Wrote > "I view them as politicians pure and simple who tried to
manipulate the system for their own gain."

As opposed to the Conscript Fathers of the Roman Senate who only served Rome
and did only what was best for her, never doing anything for their own ends.


Except maybe a little

SACRILEGIOUS JUDICIAL MURDER OF A TRIBUNE OF THE PEOPLE,

I agree with Dr. Christopher Mackay Associate Professor in the Department of
History and Classics of the University of Alberta when he said

It was the "optimates," the supporters of the ruling oligarchy, who felt so
threatened by Gracchus that they resorted to this violence. Eventually, they
would reap the rewards of this action, since they were to be the principal
victims of the violence. They killed Gracchus because they felt threatened
by his use of the powers of the concilium plebis against the will of the
oligarchy. Gracchus' tribunate thus marks the first major example of the
use, by a member of the oligarchy, of popular discontent to further his own
career. Gracchus stumbled into his conflict with the oligarchy
unintentionally. The Republic was to be destroyed by members of the
oligarchy who quite consciously tried to advance themselves to the detriment
of the Republican system.

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9257 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Ave Ti. Galerius,

Please do not put words in my statement. If you want to know my opinions, please ask for them. I will be more than pleased to respond.

Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix

----- Original Message -----
From: Stephen Gallagher
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Results of the last Senate Vote




Salve

Sulla Wrote > "I view them as politicians pure and simple who tried to
manipulate the system for their own gain."

As opposed to the Conscript Fathers of the Roman Senate who only served Rome
and did only what was best for her, never doing anything for their own ends.


Except maybe a little

SACRILEGIOUS JUDICIAL MURDER OF A TRIBUNE OF THE PEOPLE,

I agree with Dr. Christopher Mackay Associate Professor in the Department of
History and Classics of the University of Alberta when he said

It was the "optimates," the supporters of the ruling oligarchy, who felt so
threatened by Gracchus that they resorted to this violence. Eventually, they
would reap the rewards of this action, since they were to be the principal
victims of the violence. They killed Gracchus because they felt threatened
by his use of the powers of the concilium plebis against the will of the
oligarchy. Gracchus' tribunate thus marks the first major example of the
use, by a member of the oligarchy, of popular discontent to further his own
career. Gracchus stumbled into his conflict with the oligarchy
unintentionally. The Republic was to be destroyed by members of the
oligarchy who quite consciously tried to advance themselves to the detriment
of the Republican system.

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9258 From: Franciscus Apulus Caesar Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: MEGALESIA LUDI, now open!
Franciscus Apulus Caesar Omnibus S.P.D.

I'm very very proud to open the first festival of 2756, the
Megalesia Ludi!

The Megalesia are games offered to the noble Goddess Magna Mater, a
foreign goddess imported in Rome during the 2nd Punic War and became
one of the most important in the Olympus (known as Cybele too).
The goddess' sacred black stone was brought from Phrygia in Asia
Minor and housed in a temple consecrated/opened on April 10, 191
B.C.E. The Ludi were organized by the Aediles and the priests of the
Magna Mater were called the Gallae. When the Magna Mater was first
introduced to Rome, aristocratic families formed sodalitates [clubs]
in honor of the Cybele. A practice rapidly developed from these
clubs in which patrician families held dinner parties [mutitationes]
for each other on the first night of the Ludi. Over time these
banquets became wildly elaborate and ostentatious.


From today to 10th April the citizens of Nova Roma will can
partecipe to sevaral and exciting games and shows started yet during
the last month.
The program of the Ludi is the following:

- 4th April -
Opening of the Ludi
Religious Celebrations of Magna Mater

- 5th April -
VENATIONES
... funny combats between gladiatores and animals

- 6th April -
ARCHEOLOGICAL DAY
... a day dedicated to pur archeological projects. In a particular
way, we announce you all the exciting news about the Project of
Restoration of Temple of Magna Mater [Palatin Hill]

- 7th April -
MEGALESIA CULTURAL AWARD '56
... a little contest of epigrams, the most satirical art of Latin
wirters

AGE OF EMPIRE, RISE OF ROME EXP GAME
... a on-line multiplayer tournament of the most famous and popular
videogame about Rome.

- 8th April -
MUNERA GLADIATORIA
... the Gladiatores fighting in the Arena ann public
voicing "Maximus, Maximus, ..."

- 9th April -
NAUMACHIAE
... for the first time in Nova Roma, the ecceptional and rare
virtual gnaval battle.

- 10th April -
LUDI CIRCENSES
... the most famous game in Rome and Nova Roma, the first races of
the year!

Religious celebrations of Magna Mater
Closing of the Ludi.

[other events will be organized during this days like the quarters
and semifinals of each game]


Further informations will be published today at
http://aediles.novaroma.org/apulus/
The Megalesia Ludi are organized by my wonderful Cohors in
collaboration with the Junio Curule Aedile Gnaeus Equitius Marinus.
Thank you all !!!
Please, note the joint declaration we'll send you.

I hope you have a wonderful a funny days during the Megalesia Ludi!

Valete
Franciscus Apulus Caesar
Senior Curule Aedile
Propraetor Provinciae Italiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9259 From: Franciscus Apulus Caesar Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
Ex officio Senior Curule Aedile Franciscus Apulus Caesar et Cohors
omnibus S.P.D.

We would like to make an statement bounded to the Joint Declaration
of Neutrality of Nova Roma on the current war conflict.

The Ludi Megalesia will be carried on almost as always.
However, feeling grief for the war and a real hope for those who
suffer, we would like to tell all the Citizenship that Games will be
narrated with a special concern. There will be neither dead
Gladiators nor Racers, and the Naumachiae won't have a single dead
sailor. Not one scene of blood, or a murder or a dirty action
or "partial" comment will be written respecting the soldiers in war
and the innocent people under the bombs.
The Ludi Megalesia of 2756 a.u.c. don't want to promote virtual
death in any way and Show & Entertainment can't be a excuse for it.
Therefore, it will be a quiet and non-violence Ludi.
It's not "the show must go on", this is our way to say the WE WANT
THE PEACE everywhere and for everybody.

As the Consuls has declared, we expect from the whole Citizenship
respect for the current declaration and the wish of a better
international relationship for building a stronger Nova Roma.

As you know the Roman Ludi are dedicated each to a specific God.
This games are dedicated to the Roman Magna Mater. By the way, we
pray the Gods of all the religions to give us the Peace as soon as
possible.

Signed by the following members of F. Apulus Caesar Cohors Aedilis:

* F. Apulus Cesar - Senior Curule Aedile
* M. Constatinus Serapio - Quaestor
* Gn. Salix Galaicus - Scriba Ludorum Primus
* M. Iulius Perusianus - Scriba Historicus Primus
* G. Fabia Livia - Scriba Historica Secunda
* L. Didius Geminus Sceptius - Scriba Ludorum Secundus
* C. Curius Saturninus - Scriba Ludorum
* D. Moravia Aventina - Scriba ad Narrationes
* Renata Corva - Scriba ad Narrationes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9260 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: "tried to advance themselves?"
In a message dated 4/3/03 9:52:32 PM Pacific Standard Time, spqr753@...
writes:


> It was the "optimates," the supporters of the ruling oligarchy, who felt so
> threatened by Gracchus that they resorted to this violence. Eventually,
> they
> would reap the rewards of this action, since they were to be the principal
> victims of the violence....
The Republic was to be destroyed by members of the>
> oligarchy who quite consciously tried to advance themselves to the
> detriment
> of the Republican system.
>
Quite an overview there, but not much original thought into it. Remember,
before anybody here gets slap happy, we are not trying to to start a
Principate, so we have no Iulius Caesar. The demagogues who have come and
gone in this micronation had no basis, other then they wanted to make
change, for changes' sake alone. What our Senate is doing monetarily has
nothing to do with what Rome's Senate was doing.
Historically Iulius had enemies among the Senatorial class. What powerful
leader didn't?
But to claim the Senate destroyed itself in over reaching is an over
simplication at best. The majority of the Senate backed the losing side in a
civil war. Pompeius didn't have the political knowledge nor the military
strategy to beat Iulius. Anybody who studies the campaigns is struck by the
risks Iulius took, and had Pompeius acted on several of his opportunities
there would be no Iulius.
However, it is obvious that Iulius knew Pompeius, knew how timid he was, and
was safe in making his audacious moves.
Interestingly enough, whenever Pharsalus is refought as a wargame the
Pompeians win.
It is obvious that even the Romans fighting against Iulius had no heart in
doing so.

Q*FABIVS*MAXIMVS


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9261 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
In a message dated 4/4/03 1:17:20 AM Pacific Standard Time, fraelov@...
writes:


> There will be neither dead Gladiators nor Racers, and the Naumachiae
won't have a single dead > sailor.

That's absurd. Repeat after me. This is virtual! No other military gaming
societies or reenactments through out the world has canceled their events,
nor should they. While the war in Iraq is tragic, it has nothing to do with
Nova Roma, and I believe you have over reacted when such over reaction is
completely unwarranted.
You have brought a political statement, into a venue that does not
need such political statements. I see that you are all running for
magistracies.

Valete
Q*FABIVS*MAXIMVS


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9262 From: Franciscus Apulus Caesar Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
Salve Senator,

first of all, in our joint declaration we have asked to respect our
action. It seems you don't want to do it.

Second, this is not a my political statements but a decision of a
groups of citizens organizing funny events. I haven't published an
official edictum, this is an informal declaration.
We don't want cancel the Ludi and the games because as you have said
the war not concern Nova Roma. Nova Roma is neutral and we want
follow the guidelines indicating by our Illustres Consules.

However we had a "brain storm" about the opportunity to organize
violent Ludi. We all are for the peace and we feel this moment as a
sad time for the people everywhere and of every Nations (Nova Roma
too).
The neutrality isn't indifference!
We are only saying: "there are several people dieing in Iraq,
soldiers and civilians. In our opinion scene of blood and death and
violences and murders could not respect this people. We prefer limit
these scenes and organize more easy and peaceful games".
What's absurd? What means virtual or real? The idea of the peace is
virtual or real? Playing a terrible war film showing the death not-
respecting the public is virtual? Is correct to play it? Do you
think the idea of the peace in a game is less important of the "real
idea" about a "real event"?
I think the ideas are the same, the Peace is just one idea, others
don't exist.
The Cohors don't know the answers, but we don't want hurt anybody.

So, this is our personal opinion, please respect it. If you don't
respect it, you don't respect us and the ideas of others. This is
our personal feelings and we can't work against their.

You'll have the same exciting games of the last year but with less
blood and violence. What's strange?

I wish you all to play a funny and peaceful festival.

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Senior Curule Aedile

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, qfabiusmaxmi@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 4/4/03 1:17:20 AM Pacific Standard Time,
fraelov@y...
> writes:
>
>
> > There will be neither dead Gladiators nor Racers, and the
Naumachiae
> won't have a single dead > sailor.
>
> That's absurd. Repeat after me. This is virtual! No other
military gaming
> societies or reenactments through out the world has canceled their
events,
> nor should they. While the war in Iraq is tragic, it has nothing
to do with
> Nova Roma, and I believe you have over reacted when such over
reaction is
> completely unwarranted.
> You have brought a political statement, into a venue that does not
> need such political statements. I see that you are all running
for
> magistracies.
>
> Valete
> Q*FABIVS*MAXIMVS
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9263 From: nathan guiboche Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Congratulations!
Salve Consul

I will do my best to further the interests of the Provincia . My task is
made easier due to good response I am recieveing from the citizens of Canada
Occidentalis! Once more, thank you Sir.

Quintus Sertorius
Propraetor
Canada Occidentalis


>From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus <christer.edling@...>
>Reply-To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [Nova-Roma] Congratulations!
>Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 23:48:01 +0200
>
>Salve Illustrus Quintus Sertorius!
>
>I warmly congratulate You to your appointment as Propraetor of Canada
>Occidentalis Provincia! I am sure that You will develop it to a
>strong and flourishing Provincia! Good Luck!
>--
>
>Vale
>
>Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
>Senior Consul et Senator
>Propraetor Thules
>Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
>Civis Romanus sum
>************************************************
>Cohors Consulis CFQ
>http://www.insulaumbra.com/cohors_consulis_cfq/
>************************************************
>Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
>"I'll either find a way or make one"
>************************************************
>Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
>Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
>


_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9264 From: nathan guiboche Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Congratulations!
Salve Sir

Thank you for the kind words, and I shall work hard to live up to them!

Quintus Sertorius
Propraetor
Canada Occidentalis



>From: MarcusAudens@...
>Reply-To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Congratulations!
>Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 18:24:36 -0500 (EST)
>
>Congratulations Quintus Sertorius;
>
>May the days of your Praetorship be crowned with success!!!!
>
>Respectfully;
> Marcus Minucius Audens
>
>A wet sheet and a flowing sea, and a wind follows fast, and fills the
>white and rustling sail, and bends the gallant mast; and bends the
>gallant mast my boys while like the eagle free, our good ship starts and
>flies and leaves old England on our lee------Fair Winds and following
>Seas!!!
>


_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9265 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
Salve,
You have turned the games into a macronational
political statement, and attempted to hide from
cricitism behind a call for "respect".

I Can't imigine any circumstances that would induce
the Romans of Antiquita to alter the games other than
a clear omen that the Gods were displeased. I See no
mention of any omens, just a political statement from
the pacifist viewpoint, one that is hardly in keeping
with the Martial chachter of the Romans of Antiquita.

The idea that the Romans of old would alter the
content of the games because of a war being waged by
two forigen nations, a war that the Roman government
had declared it's neutrality in, is completly
ahistoric.

If Nova Roma's neutrality is to be more than a sham,
no support should be given to any macronational
political viewpoint during offical Nova Roman events,
and that includes support for the so called "peace
movement".

If citizens wish to support one macronational
political viewpoint or another privatly, that is thier
right, but this support should NOT become part of any
OFFICAL acts staged on behalf of Nova Roma, and that
includes these games.

--- Franciscus Apulus Caesar <fraelov@...> wrote:
> Salve Senator,
>
> first of all, in our joint declaration we have asked
> to respect our
> action. It seems you don't want to do it.
>
> Second, this is not a my political statements but a
> decision of a
> groups of citizens organizing funny events. I
> haven't published an
> official edictum, this is an informal declaration.
> We don't want cancel the Ludi and the games because
> as you have said
> the war not concern Nova Roma. Nova Roma is neutral
> and we want
> follow the guidelines indicating by our Illustres
> Consules.
>
> However we had a "brain storm" about the opportunity
> to organize
> violent Ludi. We all are for the peace and we feel
> this moment as a
> sad time for the people everywhere and of every
> Nations (Nova Roma
> too).
> The neutrality isn't indifference!
> We are only saying: "there are several people dieing
> in Iraq,
> soldiers and civilians. In our opinion scene of
> blood and death and
> violences and murders could not respect this people.
> We prefer limit
> these scenes and organize more easy and peaceful
> games".
> What's absurd? What means virtual or real? The idea
> of the peace is
> virtual or real? Playing a terrible war film showing
> the death not-
> respecting the public is virtual? Is correct to play
> it? Do you
> think the idea of the peace in a game is less
> important of the "real
> idea" about a "real event"?
> I think the ideas are the same, the Peace is just
> one idea, others
> don't exist.
> The Cohors don't know the answers, but we don't want
> hurt anybody.
>
> So, this is our personal opinion, please respect it.
> If you don't
> respect it, you don't respect us and the ideas of
> others. This is
> our personal feelings and we can't work against
> their.
>
> You'll have the same exciting games of the last year
> but with less
> blood and violence. What's strange?
>
> I wish you all to play a funny and peaceful
> festival.
>
> Vale
> Fr. Apulus Caesar
> Senior Curule Aedile
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, qfabiusmaxmi@a...
> wrote:
> > In a message dated 4/4/03 1:17:20 AM Pacific
> Standard Time,
> fraelov@y...
> > writes:
> >
> >
> > > There will be neither dead Gladiators nor
> Racers, and the
> Naumachiae
> > won't have a single dead > sailor.
> >
> > That's absurd. Repeat after me. This is virtual!
> No other
> military gaming
> > societies or reenactments through out the world
> has canceled their
> events,
> > nor should they. While the war in Iraq is tragic,
> it has nothing
> to do with
> > Nova Roma, and I believe you have over reacted
> when such over
> reaction is
> > completely unwarranted.
> > You have brought a political statement, into a
> venue that does not
> > need such political statements. I see that you
> are all running
> for
> > magistracies.
> >
> > Valete
> > Q*FABIVS*MAXIMVS
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>
>


=====
L. Sicinius Drusus

Roman Citizen

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9266 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
Salvete Senator Maximus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, qfabiusmaxmi@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 4/4/03 1:17:20 AM Pacific Standard Time,
fraelov@y...
> writes:

> > There will be neither dead Gladiators nor Racers, and the
Naumachiae > won't have a single dead > sailor.
>
> That's absurd. Repeat after me. This is virtual! No other
military gaming > societies or reenactments through out the world has
canceled their events, > nor should they. While the war in Iraq is
tragic, it has nothing to do with > Nova Roma, and I believe you have
over reacted when such over reaction is > completely unwarranted.

SCEPTIVS: Humbly, Senator, I won't "repeat after you" because this is
not a ludiocrous declaration. We asked for respect, and maybe this
word was misunderstunding, but I'll clarify it if possible.
Due to the Joint Declaration of our current Consularii Nova Roma is
Neutral to this war. We the team for the Ludi Megalesia has the duty
of making the games to entertain the citizenship but as individuals
we have also a mind and the will of not spreading the seeds for
violence.
Respect is taking this as a team-declaration in which you can be agree
or disagree, but never tell it is an "Absurd".

> You have brought a political statement, into a venue that does not
> need such political statements. I see that you are all running for
> magistracies.

SCEPTIVS: Not at all, Senator. What are we running for? The most of
all hold an office, and we are in april. So may I suggest that there
is a demagogic will in your political statement?

> Valete
> Q*FABIVS*MAXIMVS

vale bene,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9267 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
Salve Honorable Senator Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Sicinius Drusus"
<lsicinius@y...> wrote:
> Salve,
> You have turned the games into a macronational> political statement,
and attempted to hide from> cricitism behind a call for "respect".

SCEPTIVS: As I said before, we don't look for a political statement
and less over we try to "hide" it. We have just expressed our right to
run the Ludi as we think them should be run.

>
> I Can't imigine any circumstances that would induce > the Romans of
Antiquita to alter the games other than > a clear omen that the Gods
were displeased. I See no > mention of any omens, just a political
statement from > the pacifist viewpoint, one that is hardly in keeping
> with the Martial chachter of the Romans of Antiquita.

SCEPTIVS: Well, Senator, Ludis were a religious offer to the dead, and
we have just "turned" the Ludi into that. Politicals here has nothing
to be. Individual consciences and the will of not perverting the Ludi
with it was our intention.

> The idea that the Romans of old would alter the > content of the
games because of a war being waged by > two forigen nations, a war
that the Roman government > had declared it's neutrality in, is
completly > ahistoric.

SCEPTIVS: Sure, as slavery would be to-day. I repeat we bound
ourselves to that neutrality.

> If Nova Roma's neutrality is to be more than a sham, > no support
should be given to any macronational> political viewpoint during
offical Nova Roman events,> and that includes support for the so
called "peace> movement".

SCEPTIVS: I don't recognize a macronational country that supports this
viewpoint, Senator. We don't support any country with this; as you
could see, we are from Italy, Spain, countries whose governments
support the USA on this war, and we are on the way of neutrality
however because we are from Nova Roma.

> If citizens wish to support one macronational> political viewpoint
or another privatly, that is thier> right, but this support should NOT
become part of any> OFFICAL acts staged on behalf of Nova Roma, and
that> includes these games.

SCEPTIVS: As I said before, this is not a "macronational political
viewpoint" but a declaration of wills. I see respect has not been
observed and therefore I regret the manouvers for turning this into a
demagogic debate. Hopefully, I expect that citizens will say some
words on this issue.

vale bene,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9268 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
Salve, Franciscus Apulus Caesar -

On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 11:02:44AM -0000, Franciscus Apulus Caesar wrote:
> Salve Senator,
>
> first of all, in our joint declaration we have asked to respect our
> action. It seems you don't want to do it.

_Asking_ for respect is, perhaps, one of the most pointless things
anyone can do. Respect is earned by actions and personal qualities,
something that was well recognized in AR (see the Roman Virtues.)

Odd as it may sound, there is at least one point here on which I agree
with Q. Fabius: neutrality means just that, *neutrality*. There are
people dying all over the world in wars, conflicts, accidents, and so
on. True neutrality would mean either recognizing and reacting to all of
these, or none of them. By focusing on the war in Iraq, your group has
abandoned neutrality and is expressing a particular and specific
interest.

> However we had a "brain storm" about the opportunity to organize
> violent Ludi. We all are for the peace and we feel this moment as a
> sad time for the people everywhere and of every Nations (Nova Roma
> too).

No one has asked for a "violent" Ludi as far as I'm aware. Normal and
unaffected by political statements is what I believe we all expected.

> Do you
> think the idea of the peace in a game is less important of the "real
> idea" about a "real event"?

If the game being played was hopscotch or tiddlywinks, representing war
as a background would be just as absurd as representing peace during a
war game. These are *war games*, intended as representations of violent
events. If you cannot represent those violent events, you don't have a
war game.

If you wished to change the games to something else - hopscotch or
tiddlywinks, perhaps - I would not wish to participate but I would have
no complaint (other than, perhaps, a mild comment that these are not
Roman-connected events.) As is, I would far prefer that you cancel or
reschedule the games instead of distorting them completely out of shape.

> So, this is our personal opinion, please respect it. If you don't
> respect it, you don't respect us and the ideas of others.

Saying this doesn't make it true. I can respect a person and dislike,
disrespect, etc. an idea that they hold. I would appreciate it if you
would stop trying to conflate these two things; most people find
communication difficult enough without false ideas such as these.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Amicus certus in re incerta cernitur.
A friend in need is a friend indeed.
-- Ennius, quoted by Cicero.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9269 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Salve Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix

What are you talking about? "Please do not put words in my statement"

I was responding to your statement that Tiberius Gracchus and his supporters
were

" politicians pure and simple who tried to manipulate the system for their
own gain."

the only inference one can draw from that statement is that their opponents,
the Senatorial oligarchy, were above being

"politicians pure and simple who tried to manipulate the system for their
own gain.".

If I have misinterpreted your statement then please correct me.

Do you agree that the Senate "optimates," were , in fact more responsible
for the fall of the Republic that any other group?

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Pauliunus




----- Original Message -----
From: "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 12:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Results of the last Senate Vote


> Ave Ti. Galerius,
>
> Please do not put words in my statement. If you want to know my opinions,
please ask for them. I will be more than pleased to respond.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Stephen Gallagher
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
>
>
>
>
> Salve
>
> Sulla Wrote > "I view them as politicians pure and simple who tried to
> manipulate the system for their own gain."
>
> As opposed to the Conscript Fathers of the Roman Senate who only served
Rome
> and did only what was best for her, never doing anything for their own
ends.
>
>
> Except maybe a little
>
> SACRILEGIOUS JUDICIAL MURDER OF A TRIBUNE OF THE PEOPLE,
>
> I agree with Dr. Christopher Mackay Associate Professor in the
Department of
> History and Classics of the University of Alberta when he said
>
> It was the "optimates," the supporters of the ruling oligarchy, who felt
so
> threatened by Gracchus that they resorted to this violence. Eventually,
they
> would reap the rewards of this action, since they were to be the
principal
> victims of the violence. They killed Gracchus because they felt
threatened
> by his use of the powers of the concilium plebis against the will of the
> oligarchy. Gracchus' tribunate thus marks the first major example of the
> use, by a member of the oligarchy, of popular discontent to further his
own
> career. Gracchus stumbled into his conflict with the oligarchy
> unintentionally. The Republic was to be destroyed by members of the
> oligarchy who quite consciously tried to advance themselves to the
detriment
> of the Republican system.
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9270 From: MarcusAudens@webtv.net Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Roman History
Master G. Iulius Scaurus;

Esteemed Sir;

While we have not been introduced formally, I must write you to tell you
how much I appreciate your historical insight and your willingness to
share the references that have, to some extent, supplied you wih your
information.

I am pleased indeed to see that you have not followed some others here
in decending into mundane and frivolous comment and argument, but have
rather contributed significantly to the historical view of Nova Roma and
Roman History. My thanks for your efforts. Yours is almost the only
messages that I read rather than scan, and I also appreciate very much
your obvious belief that you are not the answer-all to every comment and
situation here on this net.

While it is unlikely that I shall ever attain your clear expertise in
Roman History, your comments and references are certainly worthy of my
close attention, as well as insuring a growng bibliographical list of
referenes for my further study.

I should be honored to offer you a place in the Sodalitas Militarium as
a member or as a member of the Senior Staff. Your Scholarship would
greatly enhance, I believe, our efforts in this area.

Respectfully, and In Appreciation;

Marcus Minucius Audens
Praefectus Castorum -- Sodalitas Militarium -- Nova Roma

A wet sheet and a flowing sea, and a wind follows fast, and fills the
white and rustling sail, and bends the gallant mast; and bends the
gallant mast my boys while like the eagle free, our good ship starts and
flies and leaves old England on our lee------Fair Winds and following
Seas!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9271 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
G. Iulius Scaurus L. Cornelio Sullae Felici salutem dicit.

Salve, Luci Corneli.

Scripsisti:

> Yes, I am aware of the precedent that Tribune T. Sempronius was
setting during his >tenure as Tribune of the Plebs, as you can
probably tell by my Roman name, I do not >hold the Sempronii in the
highest esteem. I view them as politicans pure and simple who >tried
to manipulate the system for their own gain.

I confess that I assumed that someone who chose the name "Lucius
Cornelius Sulla Felix" probably wasn't too sympathetic to the
popularis tendency in Republican politics (but, then, I probably
wouldn't have chosen to be a Iulian if I didn't have popularis
tendencies :-). I dissent on the matter of the Sempronii Gracchi. If
the senatorial aristocracy had recognized how baleful the consequences
of not dealing with the problems of land reform and the urban poor
would be in the ensuing century, effectively destroying the republic
and paving the way for autocracy, simple self-interest should have led
them to compromise with the Gracchi. Unfortunately men are seldom so
farsighted. As just a matter of personal opinion, I think that Rome
would have been much better off if both Marius and Sulla had been
thrown from the Tarquinian rock for daring to bring troops across the
pomerium for their own political ends, but historians deal with the
world as it was, not as we'd prefer it had been (ah, if Decius hadn't
decided to fight the Goths in a swamp... or if Diocletian hadn't
retired as Augustus... or if Julian had sent Sallustius Secundus to
deal with the Sassinids and stayed home to pursue his domestic agenda...).

> I also recommend Mommsen's work on the Late Roman Republic and
Scullard's From the Gracchi to Nero: A History of Rome from 133 BC to
68 AD as well.

Mommsen was a giant on whose shoulders modern Roman historiography
stands, although he did have the prejudices of his generation and
there's been a great deal more research (and enormously more
archaeological and epigraphic evidence discovered) since he wrote. I
use Scullard as a main text when I teach Roman history; even though I
disagree with some of his conclusions, I've not found a better or more
readable introduction to the period in English.

It's a great pleasure to be discussing historia romana rather than
historia musicae novae pulsandi cum verbis.

Vale.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9272 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Greek fonts on Yahoo
G. Iulius Scaurus S.P.D.

Avete, Quirites.

Can anyone tell whether there is any sort of Greek font that Yahoo
accepts as text? The way it displayed the quote from Polybius I
posted earlier made it look more like Martian than Greek on my screen.

Valete.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9273 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
G. Iulius Scaurus L. Cornelio Sullae Felici salutem dicit.

Salve, Luci Corneli.

Make that "the Tarpeian rock". I used to be able to think and type at
the same time...

Vale.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9274 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
G. Iulius Scaurus Tiberio Galerio Paulino salutem dicit.

Salve, Tiberi Galeri.

I hope I did not incite bad feelings by a flippant historical
allusion. The assassinations of the Gracchi are but one part of a
complex set of conflicting and overlapping factions and problems in
the republican political economy. The brothers Gracchi were as much a
part of the oligarchy by birth as those who led their murders.
Indeed, one political fault line within that oligarchy was the between
circle of Scipio Aemilianus, who embraced Hellenistic culture and
Greek philosophy, and the circle of conservatives, associated with
their most vocal advocate, Cato the Elder, who decried Hellenism as a
threat to the mos maiorum. Recall that Tiberius Gracchus had the
support of other members of the Scipio Aemilianus circle throughout
his year as tribune, including the consul P. Mucius Scaevola, the
princeps senatus Ap. Claudius Pulcher (who was also Tiberius Gracchus'
father-in-law), and the pontifex P. Licinius Crassus Mucianus (who was
Scaevola's bother, adopted into the Licinii Crassi). This fault line
could also cross family lines: the instigator of Tiberius Gracchus'
murder was his cousin, P. Cornelius Scipio Nasica, and a critic of the
circle around Scipio Aemilianus. Into this infighting within a really
very small oligarchy came the two most pressing problems of the
republic in the last century of its existence. First, the enormous
profits made from ranching, and a ranching which depended on
technically-illegal grazing on the ager publicus and ager compascuus,
provided incentives for much of the Roman oligarchy to follow policies
which increasingly pushed peasants off the land and into Rome (keep in
mind the story Cicero recounts in _de officiis_ about Cato the Elder's
strong endorsement of ranching for best profits, and recall in which
of the oligarchic factions mentioned above Cato the Elder was). This
was accompanied by the increase in medium-sized farms owned by the
senatorial oligarchy which were more profitably worked by slaves,
originally from the Punic wars, later from the wars which arose from
expansion of Roman interests and ambitions in the Mediterranean world,
rather than free peasants, which, in turn, accelerated the movement of
peasants to the ranks of the urban poor (the huge, contiguous
slave-operated farms which came to be called latifundia don't really
emerge until the early imperial period, and, indeed, a large number of
oligarch-owned, medium-sized oligarch-owned farms all over Italy using
slave labor was even more damaging to the free peasantry than the
later latifundia would be). The second problem was the dependence of
the Roman army on small freeholders for military service. In the late
second century B.C.E. the demands of Mediterranean hegemony were being
felt every more strongly on the Roman military which had, as a result
of the economic forces described above, had fewer freeholding peasants
from whom troops could be recruited. T. Sempronius Gracchus realized
that a solution had to be found, and it is likely that the idea of
land reform as the solution arose in the circle around Scipio
Aemilianus, but this ran directly into the interests of those in the
oligarchy who were most profiting from ranching.

After the Gracchi a temporary solution was found in the Marian reforms
which admitted the capite censi to the army and the lex frumentaria to
prevent starvation of the urban poor, but this simply postponed the
crisis by forcing generals to use the threat of their soldiers to
obtain land from the ager publicus for soliders at discharge. And the
soldiers' realization that they would be able to receive land on
discharge only through the patronage of their commanders increasingly
shifted their loyalty to the commander rather than the Roman state.
This contributed to the series of de facto military dictatorships of
Marius, Sulla, the first triumvirate, Caesar, the second triumvirate,
and Augustus which eventually destroyed the republic itself.

This is a very sketchy survey of the history of the period, but I
think it points out that it was a genuine political-economic crisis of
the very institutions of the republic which the assassinations of the
Gracchi first really expose to history. It isn't a matter of good
populares and bad optimates; it is a matter of an oligarchy unable to
see the long-term consequences of pursuing their short-term
self-interest, and of the fact that the inability to identify real
solutions (which would have ultimately benefited most of the sides)
arose from the fact that some of those solutions would have genuinely
violated the mos maiorum.

There were other factors at play as well. One of them was the way the
Gracchi tended to use the concilium plebis to intrude into areas where
senatorial preeminence had been traditional -- specifically the
custody of foreign and fiscal policy (which was what sparked my joke
with Senator L. Cornelius Sulla Felix).

Certainly the murders of the Gracchi initiated a cascade of private
violence to obtain public policy which eventually destroyed the
republic, but the problems that led to that violence were real and
structural, not just personal.

Vale.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9275 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Sources on the Gracchi
G. Iulius Scaurus S.P.D.

Avete, Quirites.

In light of the discussion of the Sempronii Gracchi I thought it might
be useful to post some links to relevant online documents on the
history of this period:

First, the primary sources:

A translation of Appian's account of the Gracchi:
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/appian-civwars1.html

Translations of Plutarchs' biographies of Tiberius and Gaius
Sempronius Gracchus respectively:
http://classics.mit.edu/Plutarch/tiberius.html
http://classics.mit.edu/Plutarch/gracchus.html

and a translation of Plutach's "The Comparison of Tiberius and Caius
Gracchus with Agis and Cleomenes":
http://classics.mit.edu/Plutarch/t_c_comp.html

For secondary literature:

A decent, if somewhat superficial, account of the events:
http://heraklia.fws1.com/contemporaries/gracchi/

Another good summary:
http://www.mccsc.edu/~blaw/Gracchi.htm

An interesting essay placing the Gracchi in the context of Roman
hegemony in the Mediterranean:
http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/ch16.htm

An excellent discussion of the brothers Gracchi with references:
http://abacus.bates.edu/~mimber/Rciv/2nd.cen2.htm

Charles McArver's "Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus: An Analysis of his
Statesmanship":
http://www.portergaud.edu/cmcarver/tsg.html

Christopher S. Mackay's excellent analysis of career of Gaius
Sempronius Gracchus:
http://www.ualberta.ca/~csmackay/CLASS_366/C.Gracchus.1.html
and
http://www.ualberta.ca/~csmackay/CLASS_366/C.Gracchus.2.html

And his analysis of career of Gaius Sempronius Gracchus:
http://www.ualberta.ca/~csmackay/CLASS_366/Ti.Gracchus.1.html
and
http://www.ualberta.ca/~csmackay/CLASS_366/Ti.Gracchus.2.html

From another perspective, here's "Chapter 6: Poor Relief in Ancient
Rome" from Henry Hazlitt's 1973 _The Conquest of Poverty_:
http://www.hazlitt.org/e-texts/poverty/ch6.html

For course, these websites don't really compare to the scholarship of
the standard works on the Gracchi:

E. Badian, "Tiberius Gracchus and the Beginning of the Roman
Revolution" in Temporini, ed., _Aufsteig und Niedergang der
Ršmischen Welt_ (Berlin/New York, 1972).
A.H. Bernstein, _Tiberius Gracchus: Tradition and Apostacy_ (Ithaca,
m1978.
J. Briscoe, "Supporters and Opponents of Tiberius Gracchus," _Journal
of Roman Studies, 64 (1974).
P.A. Brunt, _Social Conflict in the Roman Republic_ (London, 1971).
D.C. Earl, _Tiberius Gracchus: A Study in Politics_ (Brussels, 1963).
A.W. Lintott, _Violence in Republican Rome (Oxford, 1968).
C. Nicolet, "L'Inspiration de Tiberius Gracchus," _Revue des ÂŽtudes
anciennes_, 67 (1965).
H.H. Scullard, "Scipio Aemilianus and Roman Politics," _Journal of
Roman Studies, 50 (1960).
R. Seager, _The Crisis of the Roman Republic_ (Cambridge, 1969).
I. Shatzman, _Senatorial Wealth and Roman Politics_ (Brussels, 1975).
D. Stockton, _The Gracchi_ (Oxford, 1979).
A.J. Toynbee, _Hannibal's Legacy_ (Oxford, 1965).
C.A.Yeo, "The Development of Roman Plantation and Marketing of Farm
Products," _Finanzarchiv_, 13 (1952).

I hope this is helpful.

Valete, Quirites.

G. Iuslius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9276 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: April Eagle
Salve Romans

Does anybody have anything for inclusion in the Bonus Eventus column for the April Eagle.

This is were where share the promotions, weddings, births, books being published, awards and degrees conferred etc,

you know the good stuff of life.

If anyone has something to include please send it to spqr753@...

ASAP

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Curator Differum


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9277 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
G. Iulius Scaurus Fr. Apulo Caesari Curuli Aedili salutem dicit.

Ave, Curulis Aedilis nobilis.

While I understand and support the sentiments you stated in the
decision not to include death and violence in the Ludi, I am also
moved by the words of Q. Fabius Maximus. I happen to be an American
macronational who deeply opposes my country's invasion of Iraq and I
recognize the depth and sensitivity of feelings on all sides.
However, I point out that the mos maiorum required gladiatorial
combats in honour of the dead and that these combats sometimes
involved deaths. Whether we honour the coalition dead or the Iraqi
dead, it is contrary to the mos maiorum to "sanitize," even for the
loftiest and most principled of reasons, funerary games. This is even
more so for the Ludi in honour of Magna Mater. The declaration of the
honourable Consules of the political neutrality of Nova Roma in a
macronational war should have no effect on the observations of the
Religio Romana. I respectfully ask that you consult the Collegium of
the Pontifices for a decision on whether modifying the Ludi in honour
of Magna Mater in this way may be impious. Please, noble Curule
Aedile, reconsider and do not let modern sensibilities overturn the
mos maiorum in the matter of these sacred games.

Vale.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9278 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Salve G. Iulius Scaurus

"I hope I did not incite bad feelings by a flippant historical
allusion."

On the contrary I felt it allowed us the opportunity to discuss (as adults)
and learn more , about the start of the decline and fall of THE REPUBLIC.

I felt (and I could be wrong) that Sulla statement on the Gracchus was
trying to let the Senate ( Historic Roman Senate not the one in Nova Roma)
off the hook in terms of its responsibility for the decline and fall of the
Republic. I have read your message and agree with most of it. I have printed
it out to read it more carefully.

Maybe you could write your July article for the Eagle, on the causes of the
decline and fall of the Republic?

Seems like a timely topic.

Thanks for the response

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9279 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
--- "L. Didius Geminus Sceptius" <sceptia@...>
wrote:
SNIP
>
> SCEPTIVS: As I said before, this is not a
> "macronational political
> viewpoint" but a declaration of wills. I see respect
> has not been
> observed and therefore I regret the manouvers for
> turning this into a
> demagogic debate. Hopefully, I expect that citizens
> will say some
> words on this issue.
>
> vale bene,
>
> L�DIDIVS�GEMINVS�SCEPTIVS
>
>

From the Statement
"Not one scene of blood, or a murder or a dirty action

or "partial" comment will be written respecting the
soldiers in war and the innocent people under the
bombs."

That is clearly a political statement regarding the
current war. Attempting to bring your macronational
political views into the games, and trying to hide
from crictism behind vauge calls for "respect", leaves
no reson to respect you or the statement.

If you are going to make a political stand, then do so
openly, you will then get some respect along with the
disagreement.


=====
L. Sicinius Drusus

Roman Citizen

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9280 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Salve, G. Iulius Scaurus -

On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 06:15:27AM -0000, Gregory Rose wrote:
> G. Iulius Scaurus S.P.D.
>
> Avete, Quirites.
>
> Can anyone tell whether there is any sort of Greek font that Yahoo
> accepts as text? The way it displayed the quote from Polybius I
> posted earlier made it look more like Martian than Greek on my screen.

Yahoo actually accepts whatever you send it as far as character sets go.
The way your browser displays what the text contains, however, is a
different story.

I assume that you have Greek fonts installed on your system (if you
don't, try a Web search for "spionic" or just let me know and I'll send
you a copy.) Search your browser's menus for "Language", "Character
coding" or something similar and set it to Greek.

By the way, your posts here have brought me great pleasure and have been
an excellent source of information. Thank you very much!


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Quod bonum, felix faustumque sit!
May it be good, fortunate and prosperous!
-- Words spoken when the Roman senate opened its session. Quoted by
Cicero in "De divitatione"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9281 From: labienus@novaroma.org Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration
Salvete Quirites

I can applaud the intentions, if not the actions of the aediles in this
matter. I don't believe that the decision to make the games 'bloodless' was
prompted by macronational politics, and I think that any implication that this
is the case is due to the message having been written in English by one or more
non-native speakers of that language. Instead, it appears that they simply
want to have the games be a relief from, rather than an addition to, the
violence being broadcast to our TV sets non-stop by news outlets.

However, I don't think that tying this desire to the policy of neutrality that
my collega and I have decided to pursue is particularly valid. We have chosen
not to endorse any particular viewpoint about the war, and this is not the same
thing as stating an official policy of non-violence.

Additionally, and most importantly in my opinion, I have the same concerns
about impiety that Gaius Iulius has mentioned. The ludi are a sacred event and
we ought to interfere with them rarely, and then only with all due caution
after consulting with the Gods through the pontifices and augures. It's bad
enough that we're forced to stage them virtually. Down the road, when we can
hold real ludi, we will have to determine what is acceptable to our modern
sensibilities, the Gods, local laws, and so on. Until then, it seems best to
tamper as little as possible with the mos maiorum in this case.

Therefore, I urge the aediles and others who decided to make our virtual ludi
as bloodless in fiction as they are in fact to reconsider. The past ludi have
been both a lot of fun and fairly historical, and the violence described in
them has not been particularly horrific. Even with the unending stream of
images of war coming from the Middle East, I doubt that any Nova Roman will
find the kind of ludi we've had to date to be either unwelcome or disturbing.

Valete
T Labienus Fortunatus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9282 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Political Statements or just sensible words?
Salvete omnes.


>>If you are going to make a political stand, then do so openly, you will then get some respect along with the disagreement.

SCEPTIVS: If I had to make a political statement referred to the current war, it wouldn't be here in this Forum just because it is not the accurate place to do so.
I have signed and support that Declaration because I do believe that my words can be distressing for those who suffer now or ever -if I take care of them. Much more nowdays, of course, but sensible and sensitive people as I do consider myself try to avoid painful words to those who can suffer from them.
I do not pretend anybody to agree with me on that, but just respect because CONCORDIA is one of the most beautiful virtues of Rome. It brought many conquers far away from battles.

Respectfully,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9283 From: Jim Lancaster Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Racial prejudice in Rome - scattered thoughts
Salvete Quirites:

I myself have not delved too deeply into this topic yet so I'm not in any
way an authority, but from my reading of Dio Cassius, writing ca. 220-230
CE, I found these little nuggets regarding the emperor known as "Caracalla"
(I'm taking these from the Lacus Curtius online edition, so the references
to the Loeb and other editions will vary):

"Antoninus belonged to three races; and he possessed none of their virtues
at all, but combined in himself all their vices; the fickleness, cowardice,
and recklessness of Gaul were his, the harshness and cruelty of Africa, and
the craftiness of Syria, whence he was sprung on his mother's side." (Dio
78.6)

"In everything he was very hot-headed and very fickle, and he furthermore
possessed the craftiness of his mother and the Syrians, to which race she
belonged." (Dio 78.10)

http://www.ukans.edu/history/index/europe/ancient_rome/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius
_Dio/78*.html

Oddly, Dio never describes Antoninus' mother, Julia Domna, as "crafty," but
that is his common epithet for her sister, Julia Maesa.

Now, Antoninus was born at Lugdunum, in Gaul, but has no Gallic blood in
him; perhaps the reference is to the fact that Domna used local Christian
wetnurses for him. He was about 8 months old or so when he left Gaul, and
never lived there again. The "African" blood was Punic on his father's
side; of Severus' mother little is known. The Berlin Tondo is a color
portrait of the family, showing Severus of much darker skin than Julia and
Antoninus (Geta has been purged), which is odd since Julia was almost
certainly an Arab of Bedouin origin; yet she is depicted very pale. Cassius
Dio himself was from Nicaea, in Asia Minor, and wrote in Greek. He seemed
very content to delineate character according to popular stereotypes, but
otherwise doesn't remark that either Severus or Domna were in any way less
Roman because of their provincial origin, or that Severus suffered in any
way by virtue of his darker skin, a fact that isn't mentioned at all in the
surviving text (which, admittedly, is spare and corrupt).

All of which is to say that while I don't doubt a color bar existed in some
fashion, it wasn't necessarily the same as the one that developed in the
modern world with exclusively-African slave trade. A barbarian was a
barbarian, whether blond or black, but "romanitas" was perhaps ultimately
more important than "origo."

And on a personal note, I am caucasian, and my best friend growing up was
Japanese-American, and I believe I was about 8 or 9 before I realized that
he looked "different" from me in any way. I simply didn't see it until it
was brought to my attenion. Before then, if asked, I would have said "he
looks just like me, but husky." Perhaps it was the same to others in
earlier times: you had to be carefully taught....

Valete!

CN IVLIVS STRABO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9284 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Ave Ti. Galerius,

My statement only focused on the discussion at hand which was only about Tribune Ti. Sermpronius. Granted it was starting to increase in scope but my comments were strictly about him. Your "inferance" of my statement was strictly your own and not mine. Your application of your "inference" to my statement is what I disagreed with and is exactly why I asked you not to put words into my posts or statements. As I have stated before if you would like my opinion please feel free to ask me but do not infer as to what I think.

Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
----- Original Message -----
From: Stephen Gallagher
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Results of the last Senate Vote


Salve Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix

What are you talking about? "Please do not put words in my statement"

I was responding to your statement that Tiberius Gracchus and his supporters
were

" politicians pure and simple who tried to manipulate the system for their
own gain."

the only inference one can draw from that statement is that their opponents,
the Senatorial oligarchy, were above being

"politicians pure and simple who tried to manipulate the system for their
own gain.".

If I have misinterpreted your statement then please correct me.

Do you agree that the Senate "optimates," were , in fact more responsible
for the fall of the Republic that any other group?

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Pauliunus




----- Original Message -----
From: "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 12:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Results of the last Senate Vote


> Ave Ti. Galerius,
>
> Please do not put words in my statement. If you want to know my opinions,
please ask for them. I will be more than pleased to respond.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Stephen Gallagher
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
>
>
>
>
> Salve
>
> Sulla Wrote > "I view them as politicians pure and simple who tried to
> manipulate the system for their own gain."
>
> As opposed to the Conscript Fathers of the Roman Senate who only served
Rome
> and did only what was best for her, never doing anything for their own
ends.
>
>
> Except maybe a little
>
> SACRILEGIOUS JUDICIAL MURDER OF A TRIBUNE OF THE PEOPLE,
>
> I agree with Dr. Christopher Mackay Associate Professor in the
Department of
> History and Classics of the University of Alberta when he said
>
> It was the "optimates," the supporters of the ruling oligarchy, who felt
so
> threatened by Gracchus that they resorted to this violence. Eventually,
they
> would reap the rewards of this action, since they were to be the
principal
> victims of the violence. They killed Gracchus because they felt
threatened
> by his use of the powers of the concilium plebis against the will of the
> oligarchy. Gracchus' tribunate thus marks the first major example of the
> use, by a member of the oligarchy, of popular discontent to further his
own
> career. Gracchus stumbled into his conflict with the oligarchy
> unintentionally. The Republic was to be destroyed by members of the
> oligarchy who quite consciously tried to advance themselves to the
detriment
> of the Republican system.
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9285 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Results of the last Senate Vote
Ave Ti. Galerius,

For the record my statments regarding this convesation did not include any comments about the Senate or its members role in the assassination of Tribune Ti. Sermpronius. My comments were strictly made about the Tribune. I was not trying to apologize the Senate's or its members role in the assassination of the Tribune.

Respectfully,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Stephen Gallagher
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Results of the last Senate Vote


Salve G. Iulius Scaurus

"I hope I did not incite bad feelings by a flippant historical
allusion."

On the contrary I felt it allowed us the opportunity to discuss (as adults)
and learn more , about the start of the decline and fall of THE REPUBLIC.

I felt (and I could be wrong) that Sulla statement on the Gracchus was
trying to let the Senate ( Historic Roman Senate not the one in Nova Roma)
off the hook in terms of its responsibility for the decline and fall of the
Republic. I have read your message and agree with most of it. I have printed
it out to read it more carefully.

Maybe you could write your July article for the Eagle, on the causes of the
decline and fall of the Republic?

Seems like a timely topic.

Thanks for the response

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9286 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
True, but if the mailing list is not set to accept attachments they will not show up, at least on those lists that prohibit html.

Respectfully,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Caius Minucius Scaevola
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Greek fonts on Yahoo


Salve, G. Iulius Scaurus -

On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 06:15:27AM -0000, Gregory Rose wrote:
> G. Iulius Scaurus S.P.D.
>
> Avete, Quirites.
>
> Can anyone tell whether there is any sort of Greek font that Yahoo
> accepts as text? The way it displayed the quote from Polybius I
> posted earlier made it look more like Martian than Greek on my screen.

Yahoo actually accepts whatever you send it as far as character sets go.
The way your browser displays what the text contains, however, is a
different story.

I assume that you have Greek fonts installed on your system (if you
don't, try a Web search for "spionic" or just let me know and I'll send
you a copy.) Search your browser's menus for "Language", "Character
coding" or something similar and set it to Greek.

By the way, your posts here have brought me great pleasure and have been
an excellent source of information. Thank you very much!


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Quod bonum, felix faustumque sit!
May it be good, fortunate and prosperous!
-- Words spoken when the Roman senate opened its session. Quoted by
Cicero in "De divitatione"

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9287 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: G. Iulius Scaurus L. Cornelio Sullae Felici salutem dicit.
G. Iulius Scaurus L. Cornelio Sullae Felici salutem dicit.

Salve, Luci Corneli.

Scripsisti:

> Yes, I am aware of the precedent that Tribune T. Sempronius was
setting during his >tenure as Tribune of the Plebs, as you can
probably tell by my Roman name, I do not >hold the Sempronii in the
highest esteem. I view them as politicans pure and simple who >tried
to manipulate the system for their own gain.

I confess that I assumed that someone who chose the name "Lucius
Cornelius Sulla Felix" probably wasn't too sympathetic to the
popularis tendency in Republican politics (but, then, I probably
wouldn't have chosen to be a Iulian if I didn't have popularis
tendencies :-).

Sulla: I understand, I came to much the same conclusion with your name as well. :)

I dissent on the matter of the Sempronii Gracchi.

Sulla: I understand

If the senatorial aristocracy had recognized how baleful the consequences
of not dealing with the problems of land reform and the urban poor
would be in the ensuing century, effectively destroying the republic
and paving the way for autocracy, simple self-interest should have led
them to compromise with the Gracchi. Unfortunately men are seldom so
farsighted.

Sulla: In this I agree with you. Men are seldom so farsighted when they are interested in their own financial standing and trying to increase their wealth. And as we know in ancient Rome men were very much driven by increasing their wealth as it had a tendency to enhance their dignatas and auctoritas and many men at that time felt that was equal in importance to the needs of the government.

As just a matter of personal opinion, I think that Rome
would have been much better off if both Marius and Sulla had been
thrown from the Tarquinian rock for daring to bring troops across the
pomerium for their own political ends,

Sulla: I understand, but on the flip side of the coin is that where would Rome have been without G. Marius and his military reforms or L. Cornelius Sulla Felix Dictator and his consolidations and governmental and legal reforms as well.

but historians deal with the
world as it was, not as we'd prefer it had been (ah, if Decius hadn't
decided to fight the Goths in a swamp... or if Diocletian hadn't
retired as Augustus... or if Julian had sent Sallustius Secundus to
deal with the Sassinids and stayed home to pursue his domestic agenda...).

Sulla: I agree. If we were able to turn back the clock we would have tried to set up a utopia, but as we all know that is simply not possible. Instead we can only dissect and learn from the mistakes of the past.


> I also recommend Mommsen's work on the Late Roman Republic and
Scullard's From the Gracchi to Nero: A History of Rome from 133 BC to
68 AD as well.

Mommsen was a giant on whose shoulders modern Roman historiography
stands, although he did have the prejudices of his generation and
there's been a great deal more research (and enormously more
archaeological and epigraphic evidence discovered) since he wrote.

Sulla: True, but his work is a masterpiece and is still highly readible even with the discoveries that have been made. I cannot recommend him enough.

I use Scullard as a main text when I teach Roman history; even though I
disagree with some of his conclusions, I've not found a better or more
readable introduction to the period in English.

Sulla: Yes, I understand. I own quite a few of Scullard's works they are very good introductory works.

It's a great pleasure to be discussing historia romana rather than
historia musicae novae pulsandi cum verbis.

Sulla: I agree it is a pleasure but one cannot discount the deviations at times like in the subject matter of historia musicae novae pulsandi cum verbis. :) They all have a place!

Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix


Vale.

G. Iulius Scaurus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9288 From: Michel Loos Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Em Sex, 2003-04-04 às 17:32, L. Cornelius Sulla escreveu:
> True, but if the mailing list is not set to accept attachments they will not show up, at least on those lists that prohibit html.
>

No need for attachment: unicode-UTF8 passes well through normal e-mail,
and near to every language is displayed correctly (at least
greek/japanese/cyrillic etc work well), of course if utf-8 is installed
on your computer.

Manius Villius Limitanus


> Respectfully,
>
> Sulla
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Caius Minucius Scaevola
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 9:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Greek fonts on Yahoo
>
>
> Salve, G. Iulius Scaurus -
>
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 06:15:27AM -0000, Gregory Rose wrote:
> > G. Iulius Scaurus S.P.D.
> >
> > Avete, Quirites.
> >
> > Can anyone tell whether there is any sort of Greek font that Yahoo
> > accepts as text? The way it displayed the quote from Polybius I
> > posted earlier made it look more like Martian than Greek on my screen.
>
> Yahoo actually accepts whatever you send it as far as character sets go.
> The way your browser displays what the text contains, however, is a
> different story.
>
> I assume that you have Greek fonts installed on your system (if you
> don't, try a Web search for "spionic" or just let me know and I'll send
> you a copy.) Search your browser's menus for "Language", "Character
> coding" or something similar and set it to Greek.
>
> By the way, your posts here have brought me great pleasure and have been
> an excellent source of information. Thank you very much!
>
>
> Vale,
> Caius Minucius Scaevola
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Quod bonum, felix faustumque sit!
> May it be good, fortunate and prosperous!
> -- Words spoken when the Roman senate opened its session. Quoted by
> Cicero in "De divitatione"
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
--
Michel Loos <loos@...>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9289 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Respect (WAS: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration)
A. Apollonius Cordus to all citizens and peregrines,
greetings.

I do not propose to say anything about whether the
decision taken by the Aediles was right or wrong, and
still less do I wish to discuss their motivations in
making it. I do, however, feel moved to comment on the
question of 'respect' which has arisen during the
discussion.

Senator Sinicius Drusus suggested that respect must be
earned by one's actions. I would certainly agree that
honest and creditable words and deeds earn respect,
and rightly so, and I hasten to say that every person
who has participated in this discussion so far has my
respect on this account.

I would suggest, however, that a certain level of
respect is due to every person on account of their
humanity alone. Moreover, even if one does not
consider humanity to be an attribute deserving of any
particular respect, I would submit that to show
respect to others is both to increase the respect in
which one is oneself held and to act in a way most
consonant with human dignity.

More importantly in the present circumstances, I must
say that there are circumstances in which individuals
are to be respected without being required to do
anything to earn that respect, and one of those
circumstances is the holding of office in our
republic. When the sovereign people have assembled to
elect a citizen to public office, then that citizen is
invested with the dignity and weight not just of a
private citizen and human being, but of the republic
itself. He has been honoured by the populace, and is
for that reason alone to be honoured and respected.
What does it mean to honour a magistrate with rank and
title, and permit him to be preceded by lictors, and
require him to swear a sacred oath, if we do not show
him the respect his office deserves?

A magistrate may not be right, and when he is wrong
our duty is to correct him; he may not be just, and
when he is unjust it is our duty to point out his
injustice; but he is always our elected officer, and
it is our duty to treat him with respect.

I do not accuse anyone, nor do I reprimand, and if I
seem to do so I apologize. I also apologize if I seem
pompous: I ask you to ignore my inelegance and
consider my sentiment, and I hope you will find it
truthful.

Cordus

=====


www.strategikon.org


__________________________________________________
Yahoo! Plus
For a better Internet experience
http://www.yahoo.co.uk/btoffer
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9290 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: The Gracchi and the end of the Republic
A. Apollonius Cordus to all citizens and peregrines,
greetings.

I've been enjoying this discussion, and I can't resist
joining in with a thought which has just entered my
mind.

Since the sack of Rome in AD 410 and even before that
it has been said by followers of the ancient Roman
religion that the fall of the Roman Empire in the West
was the result of neglect of the gods and sometimes
more specifically of the removal of the altar of
Victory from the Senate-house or the extinguishing of
the flame of Vesta. But I'm not aware that anyone has
ever made an explicit religious connexion between the
fall of the Republic and the murder of a succession of
Tribunes, beginning with Ti. Sempronius Gracchus,
while still in office and therefore sacrosanct of
person.

I would be fasctinated to know whether this suggestion
has ever been made, and whether any practioners of the
religion or especially any pontiffs would support it
(I'm not a theist myself, so I would tend to seek more
humanistic causes, but I'm always interested to hear
theological ideas of history).

Cordus

=====


www.strategikon.org


__________________________________________________
Yahoo! Plus
For a better Internet experience
http://www.yahoo.co.uk/btoffer
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9291 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:32:43PM -0800, L. Cornelius Sulla wrote:
> True, but if the mailing list is not set to accept attachments they
> will not show up, at least on those lists that prohibit html.

It wasn't an attachment; it was simply a part of the post body.

By the way, could you please snip the posts that you're responding to
down to the relevant text, as is requested in the list policy? Thanks in
advance.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Imperium et libertas.
Empire and liberty.
-- Benjamin Disraeli; from Cicero and Tacitus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9292 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:57:31PM -0300, Michel Loos wrote:
> Em Sex, 2003-04-04 ?s 17:32, L. Cornelius Sulla escreveu:
> > True, but if the mailing list is not set to accept attachments they
> > will not show up, at least on those lists that prohibit html.
> >
>
> No need for attachment: unicode-UTF8 passes well through normal e-mail,
> and near to every language is displayed correctly (at least
> greek/japanese/cyrillic etc work well), of course if utf-8 is installed
> on your computer.

Good point. In Linux, Mozilla at least comes set up this way by default
and requires no tweaking to display a number of other languages.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Stultum est timere quod vitare non potes.
It is foolish to fear what you cannot avoid.
-- Cicero, "De officiis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9293 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
-----Original Message-----
From : Caius Minucius Scaevola <ben@...>
>
>*That* sounds like straight-out racism. Would you care to explain why
>you chose to insult a group of people based on the color of their skin,
>or would you just prefer to apologize?
>
Who's supposed to be insulted by what?

Caesariensis


--
Personalised email by http://another.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9294 From: curiobritannicus Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: About the Aedilian controversy
Salvete omnes,

I have decided to add myself to the many people commenting on the
controversial statement made by the Curule Aediles and their Cohors.

I'm not going to comment on who is right about whether our neutrality
has been properly observed, or whether violent games are needed to
sate our clearly bloodthirsty crowds (j/k).

Instead, I just want to point out that this argument seems to have
little point. Can't we all just enjoy the Ludi? Instead, one side
of the argument is accusing the other of making political statements
and platforms, while the other side accuses the first of being
demagogic.

I understand that the current war is a sensitive subject, but we
shouldn't be having arguments about such inconsequential subjects.
(Not the war, but whether the Curule Aedile's statement was against
our neutrality.) Or indeed whether letting war affect Ludi is
historical, as we've had the argument of to what extent we should
adhere to historical accuracy many times before.

**His speech done, Curio holds out the olive branch to all involved.**

Bene valete,
Marcus Scribonius Curio Britannicus.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9295 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Respect (WAS: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration)
Salve, A. Apollonius Cordus!

On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:05:32PM +0100, A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
>
> Senator Sinicius Drusus suggested that respect must be
> earned by one's actions.

Actually, that was me.

> I would suggest, however, that a certain level of
> respect is due to every person on account of their
> humanity alone.

And I agree completely - but that degree of respect (at least in my
opinion) is not something that can be gratuitously leveraged to silence
opposing opinion. Furthermore, I do not see that respect can or should
_ever_ be used as a means of gagging someone.

> Moreover, even if one does not
> consider humanity to be an attribute deserving of any
> particular respect, I would submit that to show
> respect to others is both to increase the respect in
> which one is oneself held and to act in a way most
> consonant with human dignity.

I would have to disagree here. Showing respect to someone who does not
deserve it is something that I consider deeply dishonest, and alien to
my concept of dignity. I note that the above is often stated as an
example of a proper way *for others* to behave, but I cannot say that
I've ever seen it practiced in reality.

> More importantly in the present circumstances, I must
> say that there are circumstances in which individuals
> are to be respected without being required to do
> anything to earn that respect, and one of those
> circumstances is the holding of office in our
> republic.

I must strongly disagree with this. Respect does not equal duty; I am no
more able to give my respect where I do not feel it than to pull the
moon down from the sky. Likewise, I am just as unable to withhold it
when I do feel it. There are laws that I must obey and forms that I must
follow when I'm dealing with an elected official in an official context;
this does not mean that they have my respect.

> What does it mean to honour a magistrate with rank and
> title, and permit him to be preceded by lictors, and
> require him to swear a sacred oath, if we do not show
> him the respect his office deserves?

Whether the man in the office is respected or not is not the issue in
the above statement; I could cite a number of politicians right here at
home who hold high office but deserve little beyond contempt. However,
the office they hold requires a certain duty from both the office holder
and the people.

> A magistrate may not be right, and when he is wrong
> our duty is to correct him; he may not be just, and
> when he is unjust it is our duty to point out his
> injustice; but he is always our elected officer, and
> it is our duty to treat him with respect.

Given the above definition of "respect" and the way that the request for
respect was worded, you would have neither the right to correct him nor
to point out the injustice. <irony>How can a respected magistrate be
unjust, anyway?</irony>

> I do not accuse anyone, nor do I reprimand, and if I
> seem to do so I apologize. I also apologize if I seem
> pompous: I ask you to ignore my inelegance and
> consider my sentiment, and I hope you will find it
> truthful.

I've always found your posts thoughtful and thought-provoking, myself. I
may not always agree, but I'm always interested in reading what you have
to say.


Optime Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Longum iter est per praecepta, breve et efficax per exempla.
The way is made long through rules, but short and effective through examples.
-- Seneca Philosophus, "Epistulae"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9296 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Considering you are the first person to complain (privately or publically), I will take it under advisement.
However, I do tend to favor posts that have included the past 1 or two posts they are responding to in the thread as opposed to a Sign line that is longer than the persons actual post.

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Caius Minucius Scaevola
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Greek fonts on Yahoo


On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:32:43PM -0800, L. Cornelius Sulla wrote:
> True, but if the mailing list is not set to accept attachments they
> will not show up, at least on those lists that prohibit html.

It wasn't an attachment; it was simply a part of the post body.

By the way, could you please snip the posts that you're responding to
down to the relevant text, as is requested in the list policy? Thanks in
advance.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Imperium et libertas.
Empire and liberty.
-- Benjamin Disraeli; from Cicero and Tacitus

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9297 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: The Gracchi and the end of the Republic
Salve,

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<cordus@s...> wrote:
> A. Apollonius Cordus to all citizens and peregrines,

<snipped>

>But I'm not aware that anyone has
> ever made an explicit religious connexion between the
> fall of the Republic and the murder of a succession of
> Tribunes, beginning with Ti. Sempronius Gracchus,
> while still in office and therefore sacrosanct of
> person.

<snipped>

Salve,

Interesting connection to say the least. I'll leave the theological
implications to those more versed in the Religio. Aside from the
theological implications there is a clear psychological message that
comes with the assassination for Ti. Sempronius Gracchus: "If the
sacrosanct person of a Tribune can be killed for political reasons,
then there are no limits to what can be done for political reasons."
Would Marius and later Sulla marched on Rome violating the sacred
pomerium had not the psychological barrier of the sacrosanct nature
of the Tribune been demolished?

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9298 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Oe Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:06:11PM +0100, me-in-@... wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> >From : Caius Minucius Scaevola <ben@...>
> >
> >*That* sounds like straight-out racism. Would you care to explain why
> >you chose to insult a group of people based on the color of their skin,
> >or would you just prefer to apologize?
> >
> Who's supposed to be insulted by what?

Ah, the disingenuous act. Do you suppose it might work?... Here - I'll
restore the part that contains your racist remark and provides the
context and the attribution, which you so conveniently deleted:

On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 07:01:03PM +0100, me-in-@... wrote:
>
> The
> colour makes it easier to indentify but I think that, like the Romans,
> there is more of a sense of cultural superiority to anybody, not of a
> true racism such as might have reluctantly accepted eg Colin Powell in
> his present position but still refused him access to the same
> amenities as Pinkskins

If you still need more clarification, here's an equivalently racist
statement (this is not a belief I hold but a polemical position that
illustrates yours):

"Norman Schwartzcopf would currently occupy Colin Powell's position if
it hadn't been for the Darkskins playing the race card."

You don't think anyone would be insulted by that either, right?


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Alea iacta est!
Let the dice fly!
-- Julius Caesar, at the Rubicon
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9299 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 02:19:19PM -0800, L. Cornelius Sulla wrote:
> Considering you are the first person to complain (privately or
> publically), I will take it under advisement. However, I do tend to
> favor posts that have included the past 1 or two posts they are
> responding to in the thread as opposed to a Sign line that is longer
> than the persons actual post.

So you require an overt complaint in order to "take [the list rules]
under advisement"? It's OK to violate them as long as no one says
anything? I must say that I find your perception of how the laws of Nova
Roma are to be obeyed - or not, apparently - fascinating. Unique, I
would say (and sincerely hope.)

As to the last part - you favor, say, an extraneous 200 lines over a
two-line signature following a one-line post? Your rationale escapes me.


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Navigare necesse est.
To sail is necessary.
-- Plutarchos
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9300 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Caius Minucius Scaevola <ben@c...>
> Ah, the disingenuous act. Do you suppose it might work?... Here -
I'll
> restore the part that contains your racist remark and provides the
> context and the attribution, which you so conveniently deleted:
>
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 07:01:03PM +0100, me-in-@...
wrote:
> >
> > The
> > colour makes it easier to indentify but I think that, like the
Romans,
> > there is more of a sense of cultural superiority to anybody, not
of a
> > true racism such as might have reluctantly accepted eg Colin
Powell in
> > his present position but still refused him access to the same
> > amenities as Pinkskins
>
> If you still need more clarification, here's an equivalently racist
> statement (this is not a belief I hold but a polemical position that
> illustrates yours):
>
> "Norman Schwartzcopf would currently occupy Colin Powell's position
if
> it hadn't been for the Darkskins playing the race card."
>
> You don't think anyone would be insulted by that either, right?

Salve,

I don't believe that Caesariensis is a racist. I believe that he
wrote was written as an example of racist thinking vs. classist
thinking. I think the real problem here is most likely English as a
second language. I understand Caesariensis' writing to mean: Romans
considered themselves superior because they were Romans (classism),
where as a racist would grudgingly accept Colin Powell as a mere
token but still consider him to be inferior to a white person
(racism).

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9301 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Quote of the day:
Salve, Quintus Cassius Calvus -

On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 01:17:02AM -0000, quintuscassiuscalvus wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> I don't believe that Caesariensis is a racist.

Nor did I say that he was; I said that his comment was racist.

> I believe that he
> wrote was written as an example of racist thinking vs. classist
> thinking. I think the real problem here is most likely English as a
> second language.

Hmmm. I've found Caesariensis able to express himself very clearly when
he chooses to do so.

> I understand Caesariensis' writing to mean: Romans
> considered themselves superior because they were Romans (classism),
> where as a racist would grudgingly accept Colin Powell as a mere
> token but still consider him to be inferior to a white person
> (racism).

Yes - except that the racist in his case was not a random entity as in
the above paragraph but a group described by the dismissive term
"Pinkskins". That implication - "pink skin == racist" - was precisely
what I found offensive.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Nam et ipsa scientia potestas es.
Knowledge is power.
-- Sir Francis Bacon
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9302 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Political Statements or just sensible words?
Sensible Words?
No It's an example of the Brain Dead Feelgoodism that
the mindless sheep in the apeasement movement bleat
out.

If the sacred games are going to become a forum for
moronic politics, instead of honoring the Gods, then
it's time to reconsider my membership in an
organization that has a flipant and impius view of the
Gods.

--- "L. Didius Geminus Sceptius" <sceptia@...>
wrote:
> Salvete omnes.
>
>
> >>If you are going to make a political stand, then
> do so openly, you will then get some respect along
> with the disagreement.
>
> SCEPTIVS: If I had to make a political statement
> referred to the current war, it wouldn't be here in
> this Forum just because it is not the accurate place
> to do so.
> I have signed and support that Declaration because I
> do believe that my words can be distressing for
> those who suffer now or ever -if I take care of
> them. Much more nowdays, of course, but sensible and
> sensitive people as I do consider myself try to
> avoid painful words to those who can suffer from
> them.
> I do not pretend anybody to agree with me on that,
> but just respect because CONCORDIA is one of the
> most beautiful virtues of Rome. It brought many
> conquers far away from battles.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> L�DIDIVS�GEMINVS�SCEPTIVS
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>
>


=====
L. Sicinius Drusus

Roman Citizen

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9303 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Ave Caius Municius,

Let me explain it to you simply since you might not have such a good understanding of legal processes. You are not a Praetor and because of that I do not have to answer to you. The Praetors, to date, have never approached me with any complaint about the snippage of posts, therefore I will take your own personal complaint under advisement. I have stated in my response, that I tend to keep the past two previous replies in my post to help maintain the flow of the conversation, but what I can start doing is snipping sig lines, like yours (and your sig line is not two-line, its more like 6) but so much for counting, eh, but your sig line is no where near the record, I think that resides with our Consul Caeso Fabius.

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Caius Minucius Scaevola
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Greek fonts on Yahoo


On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 02:19:19PM -0800, L. Cornelius Sulla wrote:
> Considering you are the first person to complain (privately or
> publically), I will take it under advisement. However, I do tend to
> favor posts that have included the past 1 or two posts they are
> responding to in the thread as opposed to a Sign line that is longer
> than the persons actual post.

So you require an overt complaint in order to "take [the list rules]
under advisement"? It's OK to violate them as long as no one says
anything? I must say that I find your perception of how the laws of Nova
Roma are to be obeyed - or not, apparently - fascinating. Unique, I
would say (and sincerely hope.)

As to the last part - you favor, say, an extraneous 200 lines over a
two-line signature following a one-line post? Your rationale escapes me.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9304 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration II
Salvete...
The problem with being eight hours behind Spain makes posting timely
rebuttals in the Forum rather hard. So I ask the citizens' forbearance if
they have heard this all before from the other Pontiffs.
> fraelov@y... writes:
>
> > > There will be neither dead Gladiators nor Racers, and the
> Naumachiae > won't have a single dead > sailor.
> >
> > That's absurd. Repeat after me. This is virtual! No other
> military gaming > societies or reenactments through out the world has
> canceled their events, > nor should they. While the war in Iraq is
> tragic, it has nothing to do with > Nova Roma, and I believe you have
> over reacted when such over reaction is > completely unwarranted.
>
> SCEPTIVS: Humbly, Senator, I won't "repeat after you" because this is
> not a ludicrous declaration. We asked for respect, and maybe this
> word was misunderstanding, but I'll clarify it if possible.
> Due to the Joint Declaration of our current Consularii Nova Roma is
> Neutral to this war. We the team for the Ludi Megalesia has the duty
> of making the games to entertain the citizenship but as individuals
> we have also a mind and the will of not spreading the seeds for
> violence.
>
Humbly? Sceptius you are not being serious. NR has declared neutrality
during
this War! You are a magistrate of NR. By favoring "peace" in our games you
have abandoned our neutrality. Is that not clear to you? This is not your
call. If the College and the Pontifix Maximus had changed our pact with the
Gods, you would
have been the first to know. I cannot explain this any clearer that.
You are not humble. You are arrogant. You have gone against the wishes of
the consules and by inference the wishes of the people who elected the
consules.
Why can't you see that you are making a political statement?

Respect is taking this as a team-declaration in which you can be agree
> or disagree, but never tell it is an "Absurd."

Absurd in this case is the Aediles engaging in a political statement, when
policy for State
is already decided, and the religious policy as well.

>
> > You have brought a political statement, into a venue that does not
> > need such political statements. I see that you are all running for
> > magistracies.
>
> SCEPTIVS: Not at all, Senator. What are we running for? The most of
> all hold an office, and we are in April. So may I suggest that there
> is a demagogic will in your political statement?
>

I'm talking about next year. The Aedileship is but a stepping stone on the
cursus honorum.
In Nova Roma to be elected is the result of a popularity contest. You have
just made yourselves very popular with the anti war people.

Look, I just think you made an innocent mistake, Sceptius, I am against this
war as well, but I'd never fashion an anti war statement where I would
condone impiety. As a Pontiff of Nova Roma I cannot. I took an oath. As
did you. But you are not honoring our Gods. You are mocking them.

I hope you reconsider your ban of eliminating your blood sports, as we cannot
carry
out an appeasement without them. And that is what this Ludi is for.
Appeasement to the Goddess. If you are unwilling, the College of Pontiffs
will be forced to take other steps. I trust all the Aediles will reflect on
my words, and realize that while your intentions were noble, your
understanding of the seriousness of your actions was not.

To sum up:
You made policy, when it is not your job to do so.
You have disdained our reciprocal pact with the Gods.
You did this innocently, not understanding what you were doing. I and my
fellow
Pontiffs accept this, simply withdraw your declaration, and let the games
begin.

Valete
Q*FABIVS*MAXIMVS


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9305 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Racial prejudice in Rome - scattered thoughts
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Jim Lancaster <jlancaster@f...>
wrote:
> Salvete Omnes:

From all the info I read about Rome it seems that the Roman Empire
was overall very multicultural. Certainly Julius Caesar is thought to
have been a little too biased on the negative side in regards to his
accounts of the Celts in Gaul and Britain when he left out tons of
details about their finer civilized points and technologies. Later
the Pretorian guard had a big Germanic contingent which miay show
that negative opinions gradually changed once a culture was absorbed
by Rome. On the other hand, when it came to slavery there was no
racial discrimination. There were many white blue eyed blondes as
well as darker skin slaves from all over the empire. Ah well, a
little food for thought!

Regards - Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9306 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Ave, L. Corneli -

On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:56:27PM -0800, L. Cornelius Sulla wrote:
>
> Let me explain it to you simply since you might not have such a good
> understanding of legal processes.

Thank you for your concern, but at the moment, my understanding of what
a legal process is seems to be far better than yours. "Violate the rules
until someone complains" is a laughably naive way to approach _anything_
that resembles a legal system or a set of rules; most people grow out of
it by, say, the age of 8 or so.

> You are not a Praetor and because
> of that I do not have to answer to you.

You have not been required to answer to me; be assured that if you did,
you would not soon forget the experience. You were asked *politely* -
you may not recognize what that is, but I assure you that it's common
among other people - to do something that was in line with the rules.
Instead of a polite reply (hint: that is usually what is returned in
response to a polite request), you chose to make it into an opportunity
to take a cheap (and rather transparent) potshot at Caeso Fabius.

ClueBrick: once you pull the pin on Mr. Grenade, he is no longer your
friend. Cheap shots have a way of ricocheting.

> The Praetors, to date, have
> never approached me with any complaint about the snippage of posts,
> therefore I will take your own personal complaint under advisement.

The Praetors have no need to approach you; the rules are written for
everyone. There is no legal system I know of in which ignorance is a
defense. Take _this_ under advisement: we human beings have agreed-upon
sets of social codes that we are pleased to call "laws" and "rules". We
subscribe to these conventions in order to maintain our communities,
even though they may inconvenience us individually; this is known as
part of _cooperative behavior._ We practice these behaviors in order to
receive the benefits of being part of that community.

If you choose to be part of a community, then you need to adhere, as
best you can, to those laws and rules. If you do not want to do so, then
you are always welcome to leave the community. NOTE: The technical term
for a person who receives the benefits of being part of a community
without adhering to its rules is "criminal".

This has been a public service announcement for the socially-challenged
among us. You are welcome to draw whatever conclusions you like from the
fact that it's in a post addressed to you.

> I
> have stated in my response, that I tend to keep the past two previous
> replies in my post to help maintain the flow of the conversation, but
> what I can start doing is snipping sig lines, like yours (and your sig
> line is not two-line, its more like 6) but so much for counting, eh,
> but your sig line is no where near the record, I think that resides
> with our Consul Caeso Fabius.

The length of my .sigs varies - but so much for your paying attention
*or* being able to count, eh? Note that there's nothing in the rules in
regard to signatures. As to your obsession with CFQs .sig, I understand
that there's now treatment available. Ask your doctor to, erm, take it
under advisement.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Honores mutant mores.
The honours change the customs. (Power corrupts.)
-- N/A
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9307 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-04-04
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Ave C. Municius

(This will be my last public response to this as this is clearly a conversation between two individuals and no longer needs to be aired on the ML) - a recommendation as stated in Section IV of the same edict.
----- Original Message -----
From: Caius Minucius Scaevola
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 7:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Greek fonts on Yahoo


Ave, L. Corneli -

On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:56:27PM -0800, L. Cornelius Sulla wrote:
>
> Let me explain it to you simply since you might not have such a good
> understanding of legal processes.

Thank you for your concern, but at the moment, my understanding of what
a legal process is seems to be far better than yours. "Violate the rules
until someone complains" is a laughably naive way to approach _anything_
that resembles a legal system or a set of rules; most people grow out of
it by, say, the age of 8 or so.

Sulla: My understanding of the legal process is quite clear. You can complain to me, which you have, and I have stated I would take it under advisement or you can take it to the Praetors and complain to them that you believe I am violating the guidelines and they can follow their guidelines and either warn me (which has not happened) or ignore you.
> You are not a Praetor and because
> of that I do not have to answer to you.

You have not been required to answer to me; be assured that if you did,
you would not soon forget the experience.

Sulla: Feel free to remember this experience.

You were asked *politely* -
you may not recognize what that is, but I assure you that it's common
among other people - to do something that was in line with the rules.

Sulla: I know what politely is, that would also include emaling someone privately off list as well, which you chose not to do, but that was entirely your choice. The animosity between you and I have been apparent for a while now, why should this go around be any different. :)
Instead of a polite reply (hint: that is usually what is returned in
response to a polite request), you chose to make it into an opportunity
to take a cheap (and rather transparent) potshot at Caeso Fabius.

Sulla: I disagree, it was an accurate assessment. You are more concerned about snipping away posts that maintain the flow of conversation. I believe the far more important issue is sig lines that are actually longer than original posts. For example, like your post when you *politely* tried to suggest I change the flow of my responses. That post was 5 lines. Your sig line on that post was 6 lines. By you leaving out your sig line, would have snipped half your post. And my inclusion of Consul Caeso Fabius's sig is entirely accurate, go back to the archieves and check. Or if you would like I can forward it to you and you can see for yourself. I think the post itself is FAR more important than a sig line....you obviously do not.

ClueBrick: once you pull the pin on Mr. Grenade, he is no longer your
friend. Cheap shots have a way of ricocheting.

Sulla: Now, I wonder if the Praetors might want to intervene on this above statement. But, that is totally up to them.

> The Praetors, to date, have
> never approached me with any complaint about the snippage of posts,
> therefore I will take your own personal complaint under advisement.

The Praetors have no need to approach you; the rules are written for
everyone.

Sulla: According to the Constitution, the Praetors administer the laws. (IV.A.3.b) So as administrators it would seem reasonable that they would approach me.

There is no legal system I know of in which ignorance is a
defense.

Sulla: There is a different interpretation that I have, in that I do not believe I have violated the guidelines in the first place. So, your above sentence does not apply to me.

Take _this_ under advisement: we human beings have agreed-upon
sets of social codes that we are pleased to call "laws" and "rules". We
subscribe to these conventions in order to maintain our communities,
even though they may inconvenience us individually; this is known as
part of _cooperative behavior._ We practice these behaviors in order to
receive the benefits of being part of that community.

Sulla: LOL you are so entertaining.

If you choose to be part of a community, then you need to adhere, as
best you can, to those laws and rules. If you do not want to do so, then
you are always welcome to leave the community. NOTE: The technical term
for a person who receives the benefits of being part of a community
without adhering to its rules is "criminal".

Sulla: A criminal is one who has been convicted of a crime (taken from dictionary.com and Blacks Law Dictionary 4th edition). That has not happened til that has happened one could view your statement as almost libelous. Now would you really want to cross that line? I urge you not too.

This has been a public service announcement for the socially-challenged
among us. You are welcome to draw whatever conclusions you like from the
fact that it's in a post addressed to you.

Sulla: Personally I think you ought to drop the issue or take it to the Praetors, because your knowledge of the law is woefully inadequate.

> I
> have stated in my response, that I tend to keep the past two previous
> replies in my post to help maintain the flow of the conversation, but
> what I can start doing is snipping sig lines, like yours (and your sig
> line is not two-line, its more like 6) but so much for counting, eh,
> but your sig line is no where near the record, I think that resides
> with our Consul Caeso Fabius.

The length of my .sigs varies - but so much for your paying attention
*or* being able to count, eh? Note that there's nothing in the rules in
regard to signatures. As to your obsession with CFQs .sig, I understand
that there's now treatment available. Ask your doctor to, erm, take it
under advisement.

Sulla: The Praetors can easily remedy it if it becomes necessary, especially given the fact that the archieves on the Nova-Roma main list are very much limited in space by the requirements of Yahoo. Maybe I should send them a private email about it. Good idea, C. Municius.

Vale,

Sulla
(See I snipped your sig line again. <g>)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9308 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Ave, L. Corneli -

On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 08:06:55PM -0800, L. Cornelius Sulla wrote:
>
> Thank you for your concern, but at the moment, my understanding of what
> a legal process is seems to be far better than yours. "Violate the rules
> until someone complains" is a laughably naive way to approach _anything_
> that resembles a legal system or a set of rules; most people grow out of
> it by, say, the age of 8 or so.
>
> Sulla: My understanding of the legal process is quite clear.

In which case, your ability to display even a trace of that understanding
is at fault.

> You were asked *politely* -
> you may not recognize what that is, but I assure you that it's common
> among other people - to do something that was in line with the rules.
>
> Sulla: I know what politely is, that would also include emaling
> someone privately off list as well, which you chose not to do, but
> that was entirely your choice.

Your extremely narrow view of the meaning of "politely" explains much of
your behavior, then.

> Instead of a polite reply (hint: that is usually what is returned in
> response to a polite request), you chose to make it into an
> opportunity to take a cheap (and rather transparent) potshot at
> Caeso Fabius.
>
> Sulla: I disagree, it was an accurate assessment. You are more
> concerned about snipping away posts that maintain the flow of
> conversation. I believe the far more important issue is sig lines
> that are actually longer than original posts.

Your belief is not supported by either common usage, common sense, or
the list guidelines. You lose three ways, and all you're left with is
a nonsensical obsession with sig files. According to your belief,
several hundred lines of repeated posts are less of an issue than (even
if we use your randomly inaccurate figure) six lines... the concepts
you're missing are "bandwidth hogging", "wasting storage space", and
"signal-to-noise ratio".

> For example, like
> your post when you *politely* tried to suggest I change the flow of
> my responses. That post was 5 lines. Your sig line on that post
> was 6 lines. By you leaving out your sig line, would have snipped
> half your post.

And you left in (rough estimate) 80 to 100 lines worth of irrelevant
material - which includes your signature. Since you also posted
irrelevant and incorrect information, that should also include your
entire post... but even if we ignore that, your signal-to-noise ratio
was two lines of content to ~100 lines of noise. And *you're* making
comments about people's signatures?

ClueBrick #2: Pot. Kettle. #000000.

> ClueBrick: once you pull the pin on Mr. Grenade, he is no longer your
> friend. Cheap shots have a way of ricocheting.
>
> Sulla: Now, I wonder if the Praetors might want to intervene on
> this above statement. But, that is totally up to them.

You're right - it is up to them. Fortunately, their understanding of
English is more than sufficient for what I've written, whereas yours
seems woefully inadequate. (Here, I'll be nice and translate for you:
"don't snipe, lest the sniping be used against you.")

> There is no legal system I know of in which ignorance is a
> defense.
>
> Sulla: There is a different interpretation that I have, in that I
> do not believe I have violated the guidelines in the first place.

In that case, you have either not read them, or have willfully ignored
the directly applicable passage.

> Take _this_ under advisement: we human beings have agreed-upon
> sets of social codes that we are pleased to call "laws" and "rules". We
> subscribe to these conventions in order to maintain our communities,
> even though they may inconvenience us individually; this is known as
> part of _cooperative behavior._ We practice these behaviors in order to
> receive the benefits of being part of that community.
>
> Sulla: LOL you are so entertaining.

Yes, I prefer to entertain as I teach. Oooh, look: shiny, pretty...

> If you choose to be part of a community, then you need to adhere, as
> best you can, to those laws and rules. If you do not want to do so, then
> you are always welcome to leave the community. NOTE: The technical term
> for a person who receives the benefits of being part of a community
> without adhering to its rules is "criminal".
>
> Sulla: A criminal is one who has been convicted of a crime (taken
> from dictionary.com and Blacks Law Dictionary 4th edition).

Webster's dictionary lists a number of meanings that take up over sixty
lines. The primary one is "guilty of crime or sin". Only _one_ of those
60+ lines mentions conviction.

> That
> has not happened til that has happened one could view your statement
> as almost libelous. Now would you really want to cross that line?
> I urge you not too.

<laugh> You're fishing, and coming up empty. I challenge you to show
where I have libeled a specific person or group, or have come even close
to it.

> This has been a public service announcement for the socially-challenged
> among us. You are welcome to draw whatever conclusions you like from the
> fact that it's in a post addressed to you.
>
> Sulla: Personally I think you ought to drop the issue or take it to
> the Praetors, because your knowledge of the law is woefully
> inadequate.

<chuckle> My knowledge of the law is perfectly adequate to my
requirements; you know nothing about it and are simply trying (and
failing) to formulate an insult. However, if you're looking for
something totally inadequate, you don't have to go far: your estimation
of me, your perception of reality, and your ability to weasel out of a
nonsensical position all add up to less than a mustard seed's worth.

> (See I snipped your sig line again. <g>)

<rolling eyes>
Oh, you've wounded me to the quick. Someone call an ambulance!


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Primum est non nocere.
First of all, do no harm.
-- Hippocrates; The maxim has become an ethical guiding principle in medicine.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9309 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: New telecomm laws: possible problems
Salvete, omnes -

The current issue of the RISKS digest describes new telecommunication
laws that are being promulgated (and have in several cases already
passed) in several states. These laws have been described as "use a
firewall, go to jail" laws (which is, in effect, accurate.) They also
prohibit anonymous posting *or voting* - see a sample implementation of
this in the Michigan Penal Code, Section 750.540c (in effect as of
3/31/2003):

<http://www.michiganlegislature.org/mileg.asp?page=getObject&objName=mcl-750-540c-amended>

Part of the relevant section reads:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) A person shall not assemble, develop, manufacture, possess, deliver,
offer to deliver, or advertise an unlawful telecommunications access
device or assemble, develop, manufacture, possess, deliver, offer to
deliver, or advertise a telecommunications device intending to use those
devices or to allow the devices to be used to do any of the following or
knowing or having reason to know that the devices are intended to be used
to do any of the following:

(b) Conceal the existence or place of origin or destination of any
telecommunications service.

(c) To receive, disrupt, decrypt, transmit, retransmit, acquire,
intercept, or facilitate the receipt, disruption, decryption,
transmission, retransmission, acquisition, or interception of any
telecommunications service without the express authority or actual consent
of the telecommunications service provider.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

My concern, with regard to Nova Roma, is an obvious one. Until these
laws are challenged and either modified or struck down, those of us
living in Michigan (and several other states - see the list here:
<http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/03/28/1541230&tid=103>) would
be breaking the law by voting in NR. It's a chilling development for a
number of other reasons, but this one affects us immediately.

Thoughts, anyone?


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Longum iter est per praecepta, breve et efficax per exempla.
The way is made long through rules, but short and effective through examples.
-- Seneca Philosophus, "Epistulae"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9310 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Political Statements or just sensible words?
Salve Senator Drusus

Well Senator, I didn't expect being called a "sheep". So I think I do
not have any reason to answer, as far as I just "bleat" instead of
speaking.
I honour the Gods, but it seems that it can't be done when accused
of "impius" views for being a "sheep".

vale bene,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Sicinius Drusus"
<lsicinius@y...> wrote:
> Sensible Words?
> No It's an example of the Brain Dead Feelgoodism that
> the mindless sheep in the apeasement movement bleat
> out.
>
> If the sacred games are going to become a forum for
> moronic politics, instead of honoring the Gods, then
> it's time to reconsider my membership in an
> organization that has a flipant and impius view of the
> Gods.
>
> --- "L. Didius Geminus Sceptius" <sceptia@y...>
> wrote:
> > Salvete omnes.
> >
> >
> > >>If you are going to make a political stand, then
> > do so openly, you will then get some respect along
> > with the disagreement.
> >
> > SCEPTIVS: If I had to make a political statement
> > referred to the current war, it wouldn't be here in
> > this Forum just because it is not the accurate place
> > to do so.
> > I have signed and support that Declaration because I
> > do believe that my words can be distressing for
> > those who suffer now or ever -if I take care of
> > them. Much more nowdays, of course, but sensible and
> > sensitive people as I do consider myself try to
> > avoid painful words to those who can suffer from
> > them.
> > I do not pretend anybody to agree with me on that,
> > but just respect because CONCORDIA is one of the
> > most beautiful virtues of Rome. It brought many
> > conquers far away from battles.
> >
> > Respectfully,
> >
> > L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> > removed]
> >
> >
>
>
> =====
> L. Sicinius Drusus
>
> Roman Citizen
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
> http://tax.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9311 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration II
Salve Senator Maximus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, qfabiusmaxmi@a... wrote:
> Salvete...
> The problem with being eight hours behind Spain makes posting
timely > rebuttals in the Forum rather hard. So I ask the citizens'
forbearance if > they have heard this all before from the other
Pontiffs.
> You are not humble. You are arrogant. You have gone against the
wishes of > the consules and by inference the wishes of the people
who elected the> consules.

SCEPTIVS: So you add to my "sheep" name the atribute of "arrogant".
How can a sheep be arrogant?

> Why can't you see that you are making a political statement?

SCEPTIVS: I had answer to that before.

> Respect is taking this as a team-declaration in which you can be
agree > > or disagree, but never tell it is an "Absurd."
> Absurd in this case is the Aediles engaging in a political
statement, when > policy for State > is already decided, and the
religious policy as well.

SCEPTIVS: I'm not an Aedile, I write the Naumachie, so I think your
thread is cut somewhere. However, this seems to me like a "conspiracy
theory", Senator Maximus, more than a reasonable statement.

> I'm talking about next year. The Aedileship is but a stepping
stone on the > cursus honorum.
> In Nova Roma to be elected is the result of a popularity contest.
You have > just made yourselves very popular with the anti war
people.

SCEPTIVS: Do you really think I'm running for the aedelianship? Then
you are wrong, Senator, I humbly say. I'm not in that direction.

> Look, I just think you made an innocent mistake, Sceptius, I am
against this > war as well, but I'd never fashion an anti war
statement where I would > condone impiety. As a Pontiff of Nova Roma
I cannot. I took an oath. As > did you. But you are not honoring
our Gods. You are mocking them.
> I hope you reconsider your ban of eliminating your blood sports, as
we cannot > carry > out an appeasement without them. And that is
what this Ludi is for. > Appeasement to the Goddess. If you are
unwilling, the College of Pontiffs > will be forced to take other
steps. I trust all the Aediles will reflect on > my words, and
realize that while your intentions were noble, your > understanding
of the seriousness of your actions was not.

SCEPTIVS: As far as I'm concerned, I take advices from sensible
people, so Senator Maximus, I must say that your words seems to me
very paternalist but sewed in an incoherent way, so I must say that
if you are against my work as the Naumachiae Editor and you think I'm
being a "mock" to the Gods, I just offer you to write the Naumachiae
in the way *You* could be honouring the Gods.
I'm going to do so, but it seems that there is a fierce will of
turning out the points into demagogic debate. So for ending this, I
just ask you or any other to take the Honour of writing the
Naumachiae. So you could understand my intentions and actions, which
always try to be but HONEST.
I'm not being stubborn, just sensible. If I'm not honouring the Gods
with this idea, I let you do so if you believe I'm "impious".

> To sum up:
> You made policy, when it is not your job to do so.

SCE: This is *your* statement.

> You have disdained our reciprocal pact with the Gods.

SCE: I can't but believe you are joking, but my offer is still there.

> You did this innocently, not understanding what you were doing. I
and my > fellow> Pontiffs accept this, simply withdraw your
declaration, and let the games > begin.

SCEPTIVS: The Ludi will be carried on, so there is no stoppage, and
naive questions you put on my intentions could be more of a reprimend
a father give to his children than arguments well ellaborated. So I
just repeat my offer:
Honorable Senator Maximus, if you think you would write the
Naumachiae better than I because *you* disagree my way to honour the
Gods, why don't you take the stake of doing it for the good of Nova
Roma?

vale bene,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9312 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: To the Aediles
Salvete Gn Equiti Marine
Francisce Apule Caesar
Marce Scriboni Curi Britannice
L. Armini Fauste
> I haven't published an official edictum, this is an informal
> declaration.
> We don't want cancel the Ludi and the games because as you have said
> the war not concern Nova Roma. Nova Roma is neutral and we want
> follow the guidelines indicating by our Illustres Consules.
>

Gentlemen,
Since both our Pontifix Maximus and our Augur are not responding, as they are
at other religious functions, I, as a Pontiff of Nova Roma, request that you
withdraw your declaration. By stating it you have made it official. By
binding our virtual games, you have created policy. You all took an oath to
honor the Gods of Nova Roma in your official
functions. Also you have defied the Consules of Rome by abandoning Nova
Roma's neutrality.
There is no choice here. As Aediles you agreed to hold Ludi to honor our
Gods and Goddesses. Without the Munus, there can be no appeasement.
Therefore this Ludi does not appease the Great Goddess and this exercise
rather becomes pointless.


> However we had a "brain storm" about the opportunity to organize
> violent Ludi. We all are for the peace and we feel this moment as a
> sad time for the people everywhere and of every Nations (Nova Roma
> too).
> The neutrality isn't indifference!
> We are only saying: "there are several people dying in Iraq,
> soldiers and civilians. In our opinion scene of blood and death and
> violence and murders could not respect this people. We prefer limit
> these scenes and organize more easy and peaceful games"

The people did not elect you to have "brainstorms" gentlemen, they elected
you
to carry your duties, and to full fill your oath. Please do so.
Withdraw your declaration, so that the games may began.

Q*FABIVS*MAXIMVS


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9313 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: To Tribune Sceptivs
In a message dated 4/4/03 10:28:43 PM Pacific Standard Time, sceptia@...
writes:
> SCEPTIVS: So you add to my "sheep" name the atribute of "arrogant".
> How can a sheep be arrogant?
>

Excuse me Sceptius. I believed you were one of the Aediles. My mistake. I
now see you are a Tribune.
Of course you cannot be held responsible for your magistrates' decisons. I'm
sorry that I singled you out, and I withdraw my charge of arrogance.

FABIVS


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9314 From: G.Porticus Brutis Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
To Caius Min
What is your deal man?
Are you looking to pick on people here in NR?
I have noticed that your e-mail as of late has been
aimed at starting conflict and strife.
Is there a problem?

I mean no disrespect, but really it does seem to me
that you have a bug up your butt.Sulla has ask you to
take this issue off the ML, but you still lash out at
him. It has become apparent that you have problems
with Sulla and in the past attacked him. If there is a
problem that you have with him, Get over it! I don't
think NR needs to hear you belittle him every chance
you get.
This only show your impolite behavior, and borders on
being a Troll.
Please try your own advice, be polite and do not run
people down.
G. Porticus Brutis


--- Caius Minucius Scaevola <ben@...> wrote:
> Ave, L. Corneli -
>
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 08:06:55PM -0800, L.
> Cornelius Sulla wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for your concern, but at the moment,
> my understanding of what
> > a legal process is seems to be far better than
> yours. "Violate the rules
> > until someone complains" is a laughably naive
> way to approach _anything_
> > that resembles a legal system or a set of rules;
> most people grow out of
> > it by, say, the age of 8 or so.
> >
> > Sulla: My understanding of the legal process is
> quite clear.
>
> In which case, your ability to display even a trace
> of that understanding
> is at fault.
>
> > You were asked *politely* -
> > you may not recognize what that is, but I assure
> you that it's common
> > among other people - to do something that was in
> line with the rules.
> >
> > Sulla: I know what politely is, that would also
> include emaling
> > someone privately off list as well, which you
> chose not to do, but
> > that was entirely your choice.
>
> Your extremely narrow view of the meaning of
> "politely" explains much of
> your behavior, then.
>
> > Instead of a polite reply (hint: that is usually
> what is returned in
> > response to a polite request), you chose to make
> it into an
> > opportunity to take a cheap (and rather
> transparent) potshot at
> > Caeso Fabius.
> >
> > Sulla: I disagree, it was an accurate
> assessment. You are more
> > concerned about snipping away posts that
> maintain the flow of
> > conversation. I believe the far more important
> issue is sig lines
> > that are actually longer than original posts.
>
> Your belief is not supported by either common usage,
> common sense, or
> the list guidelines. You lose three ways, and all
> you're left with is
> a nonsensical obsession with sig files. According to
> your belief,
> several hundred lines of repeated posts are less of
> an issue than (even
> if we use your randomly inaccurate figure) six
> lines... the concepts
> you're missing are "bandwidth hogging", "wasting
> storage space", and
> "signal-to-noise ratio".
>
> > For example, like
> > your post when you *politely* tried to suggest I
> change the flow of
> > my responses. That post was 5 lines. Your sig
> line on that post
> > was 6 lines. By you leaving out your sig line,
> would have snipped
> > half your post.
>
> And you left in (rough estimate) 80 to 100 lines
> worth of irrelevant
> material - which includes your signature. Since you
> also posted
> irrelevant and incorrect information, that should
> also include your
> entire post... but even if we ignore that, your
> signal-to-noise ratio
> was two lines of content to ~100 lines of noise. And
> *you're* making
> comments about people's signatures?
>
> ClueBrick #2: Pot. Kettle. #000000.
>
> > ClueBrick: once you pull the pin on Mr. Grenade,
> he is no longer your
> > friend. Cheap shots have a way of ricocheting.
> >
> > Sulla: Now, I wonder if the Praetors might want
> to intervene on
> > this above statement. But, that is totally up
> to them.
>
> You're right - it is up to them. Fortunately, their
> understanding of
> English is more than sufficient for what I've
> written, whereas yours
> seems woefully inadequate. (Here, I'll be nice and
> translate for you:
> "don't snipe, lest the sniping be used against
> you.")
>
> > There is no legal system I know of in which
> ignorance is a
> > defense.
> >
> > Sulla: There is a different interpretation that
> I have, in that I
> > do not believe I have violated the guidelines in
> the first place.
>
> In that case, you have either not read them, or have
> willfully ignored
> the directly applicable passage.
>
> > Take _this_ under advisement: we human beings
> have agreed-upon
> > sets of social codes that we are pleased to call
> "laws" and "rules". We
> > subscribe to these conventions in order to
> maintain our communities,
> > even though they may inconvenience us
> individually; this is known as
> > part of _cooperative behavior._ We practice
> these behaviors in order to
> > receive the benefits of being part of that
> community.
> >
> > Sulla: LOL you are so entertaining.
>
> Yes, I prefer to entertain as I teach. Oooh, look:
> shiny, pretty...
>
> > If you choose to be part of a community, then
> you need to adhere, as
> > best you can, to those laws and rules. If you do
> not want to do so, then
> > you are always welcome to leave the community.
> NOTE: The technical term
> > for a person who receives the benefits of being
> part of a community
> > without adhering to its rules is "criminal".
> >
> > Sulla: A criminal is one who has been convicted
> of a crime (taken
> > from dictionary.com and Blacks Law Dictionary
> 4th edition).
>
> Webster's dictionary lists a number of meanings that
> take up over sixty
> lines. The primary one is "guilty of crime or sin".
> Only _one_ of those
> 60+ lines mentions conviction.
>
> > That
> > has not happened til that has happened one could
> view your statement
> > as almost libelous. Now would you really want
> to cross that line?
> > I urge you not too.
>
> <laugh> You're fishing, and coming up empty. I
> challenge you to show
> where I have libeled a specific person or group, or
> have come even close
> to it.
>
> > This has been a public service announcement for
> the socially-challenged
> > among us. You are welcome to draw whatever
> conclusions you like from the
> > fact that it's in a post addressed to you.
> >
> > Sulla: Personally I think you ought to drop the
> issue or take it to
> > the Praetors, because your knowledge of the law
> is woefully
> > inadequate.
>
> <chuckle> My knowledge of the law is perfectly
> adequate to my
> requirements; you know nothing about it and are
> simply trying (and
> failing) to formulate an insult. However, if you're
> looking for
> something totally inadequate, you don't have to go
> far: your estimation
> of me, your perception of reality, and your ability
> to weasel out of a
> nonsensical position all add up to less than a
> mustard seed's worth.
>
> > (See I snipped your sig line again. <g>)
>
>
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9315 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Ludi Megalesia - VENATIONES
AVETE OMNES

Finally the third edition of the Venationes starts!
However, according to the Aedilian Edict about these
Ludi Megalesia with respect to the actual conflict in
Iraq, the narrations of the Venationes combats will be
plainer than in past editions.

Now let's see which animals the fighters of several
citizens will have to face!

-Gnaeus Salix Galaicus
SH 8,166
PRONEPOS (Ludus Matutinus) str35-res35
against
Rhinoceros (caught in Numidia) str49-res37

-----------------------

-Tiberius Apollonius Cicatrix
SH 333
LUCTATOR (Ludus Pentasius) str34-res36
against
Bear (caught in Pannonia) str30-res30

------------------------

-Tiberius Annaeus Otho
SH 7,500
TINGIS (Ludus Matutinus) str47-res51
against
Lion (caught in Egyptus) str50-res44

------------------------

-Roscia Annaea Pia
SH 12,500
PURPUREUS (Ludus Matutinus) str48-res34
against
2 Tigers (caught in Numidia) 1st: str40-res44 2nd:
str38-res47

------------------------

-Quintus Salix Cantaber Uranicus
SH 500
MAENAS (Ludus Matutinus) str32-res38
against
-Bull (caught in Gallia Cisalpina) str30-res46

--------------------------
-Tiberius Claudius Lucentius Vindex
SH 7,833
CALLIMORIUS (Ludus Matutinus) str38-res14
According to his owner's will, Callimorius will keep
training until next Venationes edition in order to get
more strength and resistance points.


==========================================
1st Combat

PRONEPOS VS RHINOCEROS

Salix Galaicus had to buy a new Venator for this
edition of the Venationes. Pronepos comes from
Gallaecia (i.e. a region of Provincia Hispania). He
has a strength and a resistance of 35 and trains in
Ludus Matutinus, the best one!
Today he will fight against a nice rhinoceros caught
in Numidia. Still this animal is stronger than
Pronepos, as he has a strength of 49 and a resistance
of 37!!! Well, we must tell you that this animal
already won in the Venationes....

The Aedilis Curulis decided that no man nor animal
will die during these Ludi Megalesia, so he will stop
the combat as soon as it is clear who the winner will
be. Well, actually it seems that the winner will be
the Rhino... but the Aedile doesn't stop the fight
(perhaps because it has still to start?)

The Rhino enters the arena of the great Circus
Flaminius
The fight start immediately an, after a few minutes,
Pronepos has a resistance of 31, as well as the
Rhinoceros!

You can see that Pronepos has been well trained, in
fact it doesn't take a lot to him to tire his foe.
Pronepos has now 27 resistance points, the Rhino 25.

But our nice animal is not so stupid. He knows he has
some strong feature, and decide to take advantage of
it. Rhino simply stops in the middle of the circus.
Pronepos runs against him and shove him with his
shoulder but........ ehm....
Salix Galaice, you should teach your fighter a bit of
zoology... Pronepos didn't know anything about the
cuirass these animals have! He falls down with a
resistance of 19, while Rhino keeps his 25 resistance
points!

The rhinoceros start running after Pronepos, which
runs very quickly through the circus. But Rhino
manages to "prickle" him with his horn. Pronepos 13,
Rhinoceros 23.
And not once, but even twice!
Ouch! The fighter has now a resistance of 7. The
Rhinoceros 21.

They keep running but the Aedile orders to stop the
fight, and declares that the winner is the Rhinoceros.

We are sorry, Galaice, you will get no award again!

---------------------------------------------------------------

2nd Combat

LUCTATOR VS BRUIN

After loosing his fighter in past Venationes, our
former Aedilis Plebis, Tiberius Apollonius Cicatrix,
comes today again with a new fighter and less money.

His fighter, Luctator (which surprisingly means
"fighter"), comes from Numidia, trains in Ludus
pentasius and has a strength of 34 and a resistance of
36. All in all, a good fighter.
But his enemy is a good enemy as well. A huge bruin
caught in Pannonia, with 30 strength points and 30
resistance points, which already won in past
Venationes.

Let's see what happens!
Luctator shows his muscles to the people. Many girls
get crazy.
The bruin enters the
circus........................................

and start showing his muscles to the bears which wait
for their turn behind the gates. Many she-bears get
crazy.
But Luctator can't accept such an outrage, so he combs
his hair and runs toward his foe. On the other hand
the bruin accept the challenge. He combs his fur but
he takes a longer time so Luctator manages to hit him.
Luctator has a resistance of 32, the bruin 23.

Now that the animal is completely ruffled, he does no
longer take care of his noble look and attacks the man
wildly. But Luctator is quick in dodging the blow and
hits the bruin with the comb (never use you comb for
this kind of things: it's really dangerous). The bear
fals down.
Luctator has now 29 resistance points and his foe16!

Luctator jump on the bruin and start combing him. He
cries "It's impossible you are so ruffled! You don't
take care of yourself! I can't see you in this way!!!"
and keeps combing with full strength (and he has a
strength of 34, so he really combs strongly!)
Now Luctator has 26 resistance points, while the bear
has 7!

The Curule Aedile intervenes again. He can't bear such
a beauty treatment in the middle of the Circus
Flaminius.

Luctator wins!!!!!
Congratulations Apollonius Cicatrix!

----------------------------------------------------------

3rd Combat

TINGIS VS LION

Tingis comes again in the circus for another edition
of the Venationes. Tiberius Annaeus Otho should be
proud of his brave fighter. For those who don't know
Tingis yet, let's remind something about him. He comes
from Mauretania and already took part to two editions
of the Venationes, defeating a bruin and a
hippopotamus. After training a lot (now he trains in
Ludus Matutinus), he actually has 47 strength points
and 51 resistance points! This is one of the strongest
fighters e have!!!
But today he must face the king of the circus... a
wild lion caught in Egyptus which already created some
"problem" to other fighters in the past. This nice cat
has a trength of 50 and a resistance of 44!!!!!

Hey, this is really the biggest lion I ever saw...
what a mane, what strong legs and... what teeth!!! He
look hard at Tingis.

Oh, I forgot to tell you something... just before the
start of the Venationes, the official chef of this
event decided to barbecue some pork sausage. To make
everyting more interesting, he tied two tasty sausages
to Tingis' ankles while the fighter was taking a nap
before the start of this combat. Unfortunately Tingis
discovered them only now, as they are making the
lion's mouth water.

The lion attacks Tingis' ankles, but our guy frees
them and start using both sausages as two whips. The
lion jumps on Tingis, but the fighter lashes his foe,
which falls down under two merciless sausages.
Tingis has now 47 resistance points, the lion 37.

The fight continues. The lion doesn't know whether to
bite Tingis or the sausages. Tingis takes advantage of
this hesistation to keep lashing the big cat, even
though the animal tries to react.

1st lash:
Tingis 44, the lion 29.

2nd lash:
Tingis 40, the lion 23

3rd lash:
Tingis 36, the lion 17

Our fighter is a bit overworked, so he decides to play
while relaxing. He let the lion sniffing the sausages
and... oh, that's not nice. Tingis lashes the lion
once again, then he eats a piece of sausage! (I
wouldn't do it, you know... the ankles...the lion's
hair... it's not that clean).
Tingis has now a resistance of 31 and the lion a
resistance of 12.

Tingis is ready for the final action. He divide the
two sausages in a number of pieces and, while the lion
is clearly asking for something to eat, the man start
shooting them like arrows.
The Curule Aedile must stop the combat when Tingis has
a resistance of 27 and the lion has only 6 resistance
points.
The winner is Tingis!!!
Congratulation to the fighter, to Tiberius Annaeus
Otho and to the chef. Tonight we'll have a wonderful
dinner. And the lion will eat too, of course! ;-)

---------------------------------------------

4th Combat

PURPUREUS VS TWO TIGERS

Not a nice day for Roscia Annaea Pia, another citizen
which is not new in our Venationes. In fact, her dear
Purpureus will face two very strong foes. Purpureus
comes from Tracia, he trains in Ludus Matutinus, and
has 48 strength points and 34 resistance points. In
past editions he already defeated a hippopotamus
and... SIX crocodiles in one combat!!! Oh, I can
remember it: the great Venatio Magna during past Ludi
Plebei. There were three fighters against 10
crocodiles and Purpureus was the only winner!!! He's
expected to do wonderful things in the circus!
Now let's have a look at his enemies' profile. So, two
tigers (male and female) caught in Numidia a few
months ago. He has a trength of 40 and a resistance of
44, while she has a strength of 38 and a resistance of
47. Each of them is weaker than Roscia Annaea's
fighter, but toghether they could create him some real
problem.

Purpureus is ready and wait for his foes. Here thay
are! The two tigers enter the circus...
Wait a moment, please. They seem to be discussing. She
discuss with him looking at Purpureus. He growls
against her. Hey! This seems to be a jealousy matter!
The she tiger start walking towards our man. He's a
bit wrong-fooded, as he expected a wild attack. On the
contrary, as soon as the tiger reaches Purpureus, she
start rubbing herself. The other tiger flies into a
rage and suddendly runs, and jumps on the she-tiger
but... Purpureus is there and is involved in that
private row!
Strokes, dust and roars. After about 40 minutes the
cloud of dust vanishes.... our three friends lie
gasping on the ground.
Purpureus has 23 resistance points, the tiger 15 and
the she-tiger 12.

The man stands up and goes toward the tigers. "What's
up? Is everything ok? Do you whish something to
drink?" They shake their head and their tail.
That's enough for the Curule Aedile, which see that
the only one standing up is Purpureus and declares him
the winner! (that's not what we usually call a
glorious victory, anyway...)

Congratulation to Purpureus and to Roscia Annaea Pia!

==========================================

5th Combat

MAENAS VS BULL

Hey! A new participant of the Venationes! Quintus
Salix Cantaber Uranicus, a spanish citizen (as most of
Salices in Nova Roma!).
He bought a rather good fighter, Maenas, which comes
from Pannonia and trains in Ludus Matutinus. He has 32
strength points and 38 resistance points.
Today this guy shall face a bull which has just been
caught in Gallia Cisalpina. He has a strength of 30
and a resistance of 46. Interesting!

The bull is ready in the middle of the circus but...
Maenas is not there... The bull waits...the crowd
wait... the Curule Aediles is getting embarrassed...
Here he is! Finally Maenas enters the circus with a
red cloth in one hand and a croissant in the other
one!
The Curule Aedile orders Maenas to leave the red
cloth. These are the venationes, not a corrida! On the
contrary he can use the croissant, of course.

The bull starts running against the man but... Maenas
squashes the croissant on the bull's snout (I would
like to be that bull in this moment...). That's not
what we call a real weapon, but anyway... the bull
loses his balance and falls down together with Maenas.

The fighter has now 35 resistance points and the bull
37.

The bull immediately stands up, as well as Maenas. The
bull runs after Maenas but... a couple of servant
which have been paid by Salix Cantaber hand Maenas a
sack filled with croissant! But be careful!!! They are
not french croissant! They are the italian ones! This
means they are even more dangerous as they are filled
with... cream!!! (I'm sure you are asking yourselves
"How can he knows that sack contains italian croissant
if they're still *inside* the sack?" That's easy!
Because one of those two servants, while handing
Maenas the sack, told him "Take this sack which
contains a lot of croissants. But be careful! They are
not french croissants, they are italian!")

The massacre begins. Maenas throws dozen croissants at
the bull! That's a disaster! The ground is getting
more and more creamy! The bull slides, but Maenas
slides as well! (Maenas 27, the bull 36).
The crowd would like to receive some croissant or to
enter the circus!

The servants hand Maenas other sacks and Maenas start
throwing the sacks themselves! How many wasted
croissant! I can't see that! You are so merciless!

The bull tries running after Maenas, but the fighter
skates between the two sides of the circus. They both
keep skating and sliding. (Maenas 22, the bull 31).
The bull understand that the only solution is eating
each croissant Maenas flings.
During the first 20 minutes everything is ok, but then
the situation becomes difficult. The servants keep
handing Maenas the croissants, and Maenas keeps
throwing them. The bull can't bear this. He approaches
the gate of the circus. There are two cows which give
him a sack filled with pieces of parmisan cheese
(don't ask me why I know that it contains parmisan
cheese even thoug it still is inside the sack! The
reason is the same as before!)

While Maenas throws croissant, the bull throws
parmisan cheese (which is harder).
Now they walk into the cream. I can assure you that
cream and parmisan cheese toghether don't produce a
good smell at all!
Maenas has now 19 resistance points, the bull 22.

Oh, no! They ran out of stock! Hey! Maenas skates
toward the bull with the two last croissants! He jumps
over his target, he squash them on the head of the
bull and lands raising a wave of cream which falls on
the crowd! (how disgusting!)

The bull is on the ground with two croissants in his
mouth. Maenas stands up and jups all over the circus.
The Curule Aedile, all cream-stained, stop the fight
and declares Maenas the winner. In addition, he
establishes that during these Ludi the populace,
please, will eat savoury food only.

Maenas is the winner! Congratlations to Quintus Salix
Cantaber Uranicus!

=======================================================

That's all for this edition of the Venationes. The
combats between gladiators and wild animals will come
back soon in next months!!!
Soon I'll communicate you the amount of sestertii each
winner will be awarded with!
Enjoy the Ludi Megalesia!!! ;-)

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Qvaestor

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9316 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: That Aedilian Declaration
AVETE OMNES

Sorry, but I never read in the Aedilian declaration:

1-that these Ludi will not take place

2-that the soldiers the declaration mentions are the iraqi ones

3-that the aediles are against this war so they took this decision.

What I think, is that our Aediles thought it could be a lack of
respect toward many people, to show blood and strong violence in a
period where many of us (independently on what each of us thinks) is
in some way involved in the actual conflict. There are American,
British and Australian soldiers in Iraq: some of them is dying
(again, I'm not saying whether for a right reason or not). Other
countries support the conflict officially (like Spain and Italy) or
offer airports and other facilities to USA and UK soldiers (like
France and Germany).
In Nova Roma there are American, Australian, British, French,
Spanish, Italian and German citizens. In my opinion this declaration
is meant not to hurt any of these citizens which are in some way
involved.

I would like to add one last thing. I think each of us wants peace,
and I am not referring to this actual war, but rather in a general
way. If you prefere, you can call it Pax Romana. This is a peace wich
must be put aside if necessary. But if there is a war, who whish it
to be eternal? To be as clear as possible, if i say I want peace, I
am not saying I am against the actual war, but rather that I hope it
eand as soon as possible, as this wold of course be better for
everyone.
So, please, if a person tell you he wants peace, don't think
immediatly he's making a political statement.

BENE VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Qvaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9317 From: G.Porticus Brutis Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: That Aedilian Declaration
Very well said..
Bravo
Manivs

May there be peace.
and let the games continue..
By the way Gnaeus Salix Galaicus was robbed! He should
have a rematch immediately,or after he can catch his
breath.
LOL
Brutis
--- Manius Constantinus Serapio <mcserapio@...>
wrote:
> AVETE OMNES
>
> Sorry, but I never read in the Aedilian declaration:
>
> 1-that these Ludi will not take place
>
> 2-that the soldiers the declaration mentions are the
> iraqi ones
>
> 3-that the aediles are against this war so they took
> this decision.
>
> What I think, is that our Aediles thought it could
> be a lack of
> respect toward many people, to show blood and strong
> violence in a
> period where many of us (independently on what each
> of us thinks) is
> in some way involved in the actual conflict. There
> are American,
> British and Australian soldiers in Iraq: some of
> them is dying
> (again, I'm not saying whether for a right reason or
> not). Other
> countries support the conflict officially (like
> Spain and Italy) or
> offer airports and other facilities to USA and UK
> soldiers (like
> France and Germany).
> In Nova Roma there are American, Australian,
> British, French,
> Spanish, Italian and German citizens. In my opinion
> this declaration
> is meant not to hurt any of these citizens which are
> in some way
> involved.
>
> I would like to add one last thing. I think each of
> us wants peace,
> and I am not referring to this actual war, but
> rather in a general
> way. If you prefere, you can call it Pax Romana.
> This is a peace wich
> must be put aside if necessary. But if there is a
> war, who whish it
> to be eternal? To be as clear as possible, if i say
> I want peace, I
> am not saying I am against the actual war, but
> rather that I hope it
> eand as soon as possible, as this wold of course be
> better for
> everyone.
> So, please, if a person tell you he wants peace,
> don't think
> immediatly he's making a political statement.
>
> BENE VALETE
> Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
> Qvaestor
>
>
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9318 From: Franciscus Apulus Caesar Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Megalesia affair
Salvete Omnes,

sorry for my little absence, I had a complicated surgical operation
to a tooth yesterday and I'm not so fine. So I answer to all the
gentlemen have discussed about, Illustrus Consul and Illustrus
Pontefix too.

First of all the Joint declaration is by me and my Cohors. My
Illustres colleagues Aediles didn't sign it, so please don't consider
them.

I want to explain that we haven't said to not want organize the
games. We say we organize the games but without violent scenes.
What is bad here? Do you want blood? Why?
The blood and violence are not needed and obliged parts of the games.
Why do you don't want quiet Ludi?

Illustrus Labienus, Illustrus Maximus and everybody, have you readen
the histories of Venationes? Is this game so different from the game
of the last year? Is it less funny? Is it against the Gods because it
hadn't blood or murders? Do you think chariot races without accidents
could offense the Gods? Do you think Naumachiae without blood hurt
our Res Publica?
I thing not, however I thing a bloodly and tragical murder of
gladiator could hurt a citizen.

I don't think quiet Ludi are cracking the pact with the Gods and my
Oath as Magistrate. The Constitution say me that I have to organize
Ludi but it don't say me that I have to organize violent and bloodly
games. Where is written?
Yes, I agree, these Ludi are not historical correct but Ancient
Romans lived in a costant status of war. We are not in the 50 D.C.,
we are in a time where the war is a tragical event.

These Ludi are dedicated to Magna Mater and I know Magna Mater is not
the "War Goddess". Magna Mater is the Earth, is the Nature, is
fertility and prosperity. The war isn't Nature, isn't life, is death.
How I'm working against the Goddess Magna Mater? Maybe, Ludi without
blood are hurting Cybele? Please, Senator Maximus, explain me where I
have cracked the pact with the Goddess.

I don't think we didn't respect the declaration of neutrality of Nova
Roma. It say us the Res Publica is not supporting a factio or an
idea. Yes, I'm a Magistrate and I have to follow what my Res Publica
indicate. However first of all I'm a man and as a man I have feelings
and ideas. IMHO these ideas is not different by the guidelines of
Nova Roma. I don't say we are pro or against the war. I say I'm for
the eternal idea of the peace. Is this political? Is this against our
declaration of neutrality?
I can't work and imagine virtual murders thinking people far 1.500 km
to me are dying. Sorry, I'm a man. Maybe this is feelgoodism, this is
political, this is partial, I don't know, this is my idea!

As a my colleague have said, in this period everything is political.
Being for the war is political, being for the peace is political. But
I think this is stupid. We haven't said the war is correct or wrong,
we haven't said we are for USA or Iraq, we haven't said we are
against or pro-war, etc.
We are only saying we are for the peace, we don't want hurt
everybody, we want respect the soldier and the civilians in this
moment. Is this a political statements? Yes? I think not but if you
think yes, well, I'm writing a political statements and I don't
withdraw it.

We have been accused to be "feelgoodist", moronics, politicians,
arrogants, impuries, against the Gods, etc. Thank you very much to
everybody have said this. I thing it's early to run for an Office of
2757...
I think you are attacking and criticing and processing us before to
have seen. Someone have said this is demagogic, someone think is
political, I think it's stupid.

Maximus, you're asking me to withdraw an unofficcial and informal
declaration. This is not a law or an edictum! Please, wait for the
end of the Ludi and after judge. After, if you think my Megalesia
Ludi have hurted the Gods and I have cracked my Oath you'll can
realyze your threats, I'll present my jobs to the evaluation of the
Res Publica and Collegium of Pontiffs.

So at the end, we don't withdraw our Declaration. We don't organize
bloodly and violent games. We don't want hurt the Res Publica and the
Gods.
We organize quiet and peaceful Ludi. We follow the declaration of
nautrality or our Consules. We offer you funny shows.

BTW we ask the apologies of the citizens have hurted us (me and my
assistants) with harsh words written in the past messages. I ask to
the authorities to value these words and think about the actions
moved against us.
As Magistrate of Res Publica I remember you all that if you aren't an
higher Magistrate you don't must interfere with the running Ludi!

Well, thank you all for your attenction. Please, live quietly in this
tragical time. Have a funny festival and pray Magna Mater for a world
of peace. I hope you enjoy Megalesia Ludi.

I come back to the bed, my tooth is very very hurting and I'm tired.

Valete
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Senior Curule Aedile
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9319 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Ludi Megalesia background
Salve,

Did a little background checking on the Ludi Megalesia and its
origins. As near as I can tell the Ludi Medalesia started during or
right after the Second Punic War. During the second Punic War the
Sibylline Books revealed that Hannnibal would leave Italy when the
Great Mother (Magna Mater/Goddess Cybele) was brought to Rome. In
about 204, her sacred black stone was shipped to Ostia, where Scipio
Nasica took custody of it and brought it to the city.

However, later the Romans discovered that worship of the Great Mother
included not just self-flagellation but castration of the priests.
As a result the cult of Magna Mater was restricted to non-Romans
until Emperor Claudius decreed otherwise. However, honor was still
paid to Magna Mater with a six day long Megalensia that included
sacrifices, feasts, chariot races and games.

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9320 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 02:14:41AM -0800, G.Porticus Brutis wrote:
> To Caius Min
> What is your deal man?

$1000/day or $125/hour, with negotiable discounts for longer term
contracts.

> Are you looking to pick on people here in NR?

If you're looking to be picked on and consider yourself "people", I
could probably arrange something for you, but I'd have to subcontract
it; I don't "pick on people" and I don't deal with borderline trolls.

Incidentally, since I hadn't mentioned it previously: you're the only
poster on this list whom I thought of killfiling immediately after your
few initial posts. The only reason I didn't was that you quieted down.

> I have noticed that your e-mail as of late has been
> aimed at starting conflict and strife.
> Is there a problem?
>
> I mean no disrespect, but really it does seem to me
> that you have a bug up your butt.

Ah - I recognize that; it's killfile bait.

Goodbye, simple soul.

*PLONK!!!*


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
In magnis et voluisse sat est.
To once have wanted is enough in great deeds.
-- Propertius, "Elegies"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9321 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: I'm still here & MEGALESIA LUDI
Salvete citizens,

I don't know if anyone has noticed, but I have been very quiet lately :-)
Honestly, I have been just deleting all of my list emails without reading
them and I did not read the joint declaration.

I am against the current war and any war. But I don't think that we should
change the way we do things in Nova Roma because of it. These are virtual
games and even with the 'blood' they are (dare I say it?) fun... That said,
I am not sure if lack of blood dishonors our Gods. But.... I think that
alongside their Christianity or other faith, I believe that Nova Romans
(especially the magistrates) should honor our Gods just a bit more in their
daily lives and in their decisions here in our micronation.I realize that I
have just stepped on a few hundred toes <Diana watches as her political
career flies out the window> If we are emulating the ancient Romans then
the Religio should have a more important place here. The Romans performed
rituals because they often wanted something from the Gods. It was often an
'I'll give to you if you give to me' arrangement. Maybe as a nation we need
to do this a bit more, so as a nation we receive a bit more of the Gods'
blessings. Just my thoughts.

Valete,
Diana Moravia Aventina
(still here)
(still) Tribune
(still) Priestess of Venus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9322 From: G.Porticus Brutis Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
What in the world are you talking about?
Killfiling?
B.
--- Caius Minucius Scaevola <ben@...> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 02:14:41AM -0800, G.Porticus
> Brutis wrote:
> > To Caius Min
> > What is your deal man?
>
> $1000/day or $125/hour, with negotiable discounts
> for longer term
> contracts.
>
> > Are you looking to pick on people here in NR?
>
> If you're looking to be picked on and consider
> yourself "people", I
> could probably arrange something for you, but I'd
> have to subcontract
> it; I don't "pick on people" and I don't deal with
> borderline trolls.
>
> Incidentally, since I hadn't mentioned it
> previously: you're the only
> poster on this list whom I thought of killfiling
> immediately after your
> few initial posts. The only reason I didn't was that
> you quieted down.
>
> > I have noticed that your e-mail as of late has
> been
> > aimed at starting conflict and strife.
> > Is there a problem?
> >
> > I mean no disrespect, but really it does seem to
> me
> > that you have a bug up your butt.
>
> Ah - I recognize that; it's killfile bait.
>
> Goodbye, simple soul.
>
> *PLONK!!!*
>
>
> Caius Minucius Scaevola
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> In magnis et voluisse sat est.
> To once have wanted is enough in great deeds.
> -- Propertius, "Elegies"
>


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9323 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Killfile is geekspeak for the file that contains email
filters. When it's used as a verb it means to set up
an email filter that will delete any posts from
someone who's correspondance isn't welcome.

--- "G.Porticus Brutis" <celtic4usa@...> wrote:
> What in the world are you talking about?
> Killfiling?
> B.
> --- Caius Minucius Scaevola <ben@...>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 02:14:41AM -0800,
> G.Porticus
> > Brutis wrote:
> > > To Caius Min
> > > What is your deal man?
> >
> > $1000/day or $125/hour, with negotiable discounts
> > for longer term
> > contracts.
> >
> > > Are you looking to pick on people here in NR?
> >
> > If you're looking to be picked on and consider
> > yourself "people", I
> > could probably arrange something for you, but I'd
> > have to subcontract
> > it; I don't "pick on people" and I don't deal with
> > borderline trolls.
> >
> > Incidentally, since I hadn't mentioned it
> > previously: you're the only
> > poster on this list whom I thought of killfiling
> > immediately after your
> > few initial posts. The only reason I didn't was
> that
> > you quieted down.
> >
> > > I have noticed that your e-mail as of late has
> > been
> > > aimed at starting conflict and strife.
> > > Is there a problem?
> > >
> > > I mean no disrespect, but really it does seem to
> > me
> > > that you have a bug up your butt.
> >
> > Ah - I recognize that; it's killfile bait.
> >
> > Goodbye, simple soul.
> >
> > *PLONK!!!*
> >
> >
> > Caius Minucius Scaevola
> >
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > In magnis et voluisse sat est.
> > To once have wanted is enough in great deeds.
> > -- Propertius, "Elegies"
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms,
> and more
> http://tax.yahoo.com
>


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9324 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 06:30:09AM -0800, L. Sicinius Drusus wrote:
> Killfile is geekspeak for the file that contains email
> filters. When it's used as a verb it means to set up
> an email filter that will delete any posts from
> someone who's correspondance isn't welcome.

Yes indeed. And "plonk!" is the notional sound made by dropping the
poster's header info into a killfile.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Melius frangi quam flecti.
It is better to break than to bend.
-- N/A
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9325 From: G.Porticus Brutis Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
What are you some kind of Jerk.
I have never had someone in NR act as you have.You are
nothing more than a punk! and NR should have you ban
from this group. There is no reason for you to
threaten me in any way!
Try to show off to someone who cares.

--- Caius Minucius Scaevola <ben@...> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 06:30:09AM -0800, L.
> Sicinius Drusus wrote:
> > Killfile is geekspeak for the file that contains
> email
> > filters. When it's used as a verb it means to set
> up
> > an email filter that will delete any posts from
> > someone who's correspondance isn't welcome.
>
> Yes indeed. And "plonk!" is the notional sound made
> by dropping the
> poster's header info into a killfile.
>
>
> Vale,
> Caius Minucius Scaevola
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Melius frangi quam flecti.
> It is better to break than to bend.
> -- N/A
>


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9326 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: That Aedilian Declaration
Ave, Manius Constantinus Serapio!

On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 11:18:24AM -0000, Manius Constantinus Serapio wrote:
>
> I would like to add one last thing. I think each of us wants peace,
> and I am not referring to this actual war, but rather in a general
> way. If you prefere, you can call it Pax Romana. This is a peace wich
> must be put aside if necessary. But if there is a war, who whish it
> to be eternal? To be as clear as possible, if i say I want peace, I
> am not saying I am against the actual war, but rather that I hope it
> eand as soon as possible, as this wold of course be better for
> everyone.
> So, please, if a person tell you he wants peace, don't think
> immediatly he's making a political statement.

Just to draw a separating line: I do not agree with Q. Fabius or L.
Sicinius in their strong characterizations of the people involved in
making this declaration. I believe that it was made from honorable
motives and a sincere desire for peace.

I'll leave aside the question of piety, which I do not consider myself
competent to judge; however, the declaration itself *is* a political
statement - not that "political" is necessarily something negative - in
that it affects us all as a group. To quote Webster's dictionary,

Of or pertaining to public policy, or to politics; relating to affairs
of state or administration.

It most certainly suits the definition.

I understand that you see this as making a statement for peace. The
problem is, it was not made just on the behalf of its signers - by
changing the Ludi, it becomes a statement on behalf of all Nova Roma. I,
for one, don't have anything against peace - but I do very much object
to having others take political positions on my behalf, and I do not
grant anyone the right to make political statements (especially
macronational ones) in my name. I usually avoid joining organizations
for that very reason.

The change in the games destroys a tangible benefit, at least for those
of us who perceive games as I do. What makes a game enjoyable, to me, is
the _risk:_ the chance of winning or losing. The loser goes down in
flames, the winner has his triumph... and - here is the wonderful thing
about games - you can do it all again the next time, with no _real_
bloodshed or loss. (For those whose egos aren't strong enough to take an
occasional bruising, well, there's always Myst and Adventure and such.
Oh, wait - they keep score too...) I believe that modeling violent
conflict in games - *which are themselves non-violent* - is an excellent
path for NR (and perhaps the rest of the world - imagine two countries
that, instead of going to war, play a game of chess to settle the /casus
belli/) to follow. Trying to make the games "bloodless" when they
already are by their nature makes them bloodless per one of the meanings
in Webster's: "without vigor or zest or energy".

I see this proposed change in the games - a change which, in my opinion,
destroys the very nature of those games - as strongly detrimental, and
hope that the people involved will reconsider their decision. They
_have_ made their statement for peace, and many people have read it;
however, changing the Ludi is far more than a personal statement.


Optime vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Saepe creat molles aspera spina rosas.
Often the prickly thorn produces tender roses.
-- Ovid
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9327 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: To Tribune Sceptivs
Salve Senator Maximus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, qfabiusmaxmi@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 4/4/03 10:28:43 PM Pacific Standard Time,
sceptia@y...
> writes:
> > SCEPTIVS: So you add to my "sheep" name the atribute
of "arrogant". > > How can a sheep be arrogant?
> >
>
> Excuse me Sceptius. I believed you were one of the Aediles. My
mistake. I > now see you are a Tribune. > Of course you cannot be
held responsible for your magistrates' decisons. I'm > sorry that I
singled you out, and I withdraw my charge of arrogance.
>
> FABIVS

I accept the apologize. As Tribune I have said *nothing* on this
issue. And I've separated things and made them clear. I hope it would
be clearer now to all, including your honorable colleague L. Sicinius
Drusus.

vale bene,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9328 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Digest No 529 Re: Political Statements
Pontifex Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus Augur Omnibus Quiritibus SPD

I call upon the Consules, Praetores, Aediles Curules to veto the "MEGALESIA
LUDI: Joint Declaration II" in it's present form which expresses political
sentiments at the expense of the game's real intent. The Ludi are to please
the
Gods, not men.
Let the call for the games (Ludi) be reissued in a more appropriate manner.

________________________________________________________________________

Message: 22
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:51:02 -0800 (PST)
From: "L. Sicinius Drusus" <lsicinius@...>
Subject: Re: Political Statements or just sensible words?

Sensible Words?
No It's an example of the Brain Dead Feelgoodism that
the mindless sheep in the apeasement movement bleat
out.

If the sacred games are going to become a forum for
moronic politics, instead of honoring the Gods, then
it's time to reconsider my membership in an
organization that has a flipant and impius view of the
Gods.

--- "L. Didius Geminus Sceptius" <sceptia@...>
wrote:
> Salvete omnes.
>
>
> >>If you are going to make a political stand, then
> do so openly, you will then get some respect along
> with the disagreement.
>
> SCEPTIVS: If I had to make a political statement
> referred to the current war, it wouldn't be here in
> this Forum just because it is not the accurate place
> to do so.
> I have signed and support that Declaration because I
> do believe that my words can be distressing for
> those who suffer now or ever -if I take care of
> them. Much more nowdays, of course, but sensible and
> sensitive people as I do consider myself try to
> avoid painful words to those who can suffer from
> them.
> I do not pretend anybody to agree with me on that,
> but just respect because CONCORDIA is one of the
> most beautiful virtues of Rome. It brought many
> conquers far away from battles.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>
>


=====
L. Sicinius Drusus

Roman Citizen

________________________________________________________________________

Message: 24
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 21:24:35 EST
From: qfabiusmaxmi@...
Subject: Re: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration II

Salvete...
The problem with being eight hours behind Spain makes posting timely
rebuttals in the Forum rather hard. So I ask the citizens' forbearance if
they have heard this all before from the other Pontiffs.
> fraelov@y... writes:
>
> > > There will be neither dead Gladiators nor Racers, and the
> Naumachiae > won't have a single dead > sailor.
> >
> > That's absurd. Repeat after me. This is virtual! No other
> military gaming > societies or reenactments through out the world has
> canceled their events, > nor should they. While the war in Iraq is
> tragic, it has nothing to do with > Nova Roma, and I believe you have
> over reacted when such over reaction is > completely unwarranted.
>
> SCEPTIVS: Humbly, Senator, I won't "repeat after you" because this is
> not a ludicrous declaration. We asked for respect, and maybe this
> word was misunderstanding, but I'll clarify it if possible.
> Due to the Joint Declaration of our current Consularii Nova Roma is
> Neutral to this war. We the team for the Ludi Megalesia has the duty
> of making the games to entertain the citizenship but as individuals
> we have also a mind and the will of not spreading the seeds for
> violence.
>
Humbly? Sceptius you are not being serious. NR has declared neutrality
during
this War! You are a magistrate of NR. By favoring "peace" in our games you
have abandoned our neutrality. Is that not clear to you? This is not your
call. If the College and the Pontifix Maximus had changed our pact with the
Gods, you would
have been the first to know. I cannot explain this any clearer that.
You are not humble. You are arrogant. You have gone against the wishes of
the consules and by inference the wishes of the people who elected the
consules.
Why can't you see that you are making a political statement?

Respect is taking this as a team-declaration in which you can be agree
> or disagree, but never tell it is an "Absurd."

Absurd in this case is the Aediles engaging in a political statement, when
policy for State
is already decided, and the religious policy as well.

>
> > You have brought a political statement, into a venue that does not
> > need such political statements. I see that you are all running for
> > magistracies.
>
> SCEPTIVS: Not at all, Senator. What are we running for? The most of
> all hold an office, and we are in April. So may I suggest that there
> is a demagogic will in your political statement?
>

I'm talking about next year. The Aedileship is but a stepping stone on the
cursus honorum.
In Nova Roma to be elected is the result of a popularity contest. You have
just made yourselves very popular with the anti war people.

Look, I just think you made an innocent mistake, Sceptius, I am against this
war as well, but I'd never fashion an anti war statement where I would
condone impiety. As a Pontiff of Nova Roma I cannot. I took an oath. As
did you. But you are not honoring our Gods. You are mocking them.

I hope you reconsider your ban of eliminating your blood sports, as we
cannot
carry
out an appeasement without them. And that is what this Ludi is for.
Appeasement to the Goddess. If you are unwilling, the College of Pontiffs
will be forced to take other steps. I trust all the Aediles will reflect on
my words, and realize that while your intentions were noble, your
understanding of the seriousness of your actions was not.

To sum up:
You made policy, when it is not your job to do so.
You have disdained our reciprocal pact with the Gods.
You did this innocently, not understanding what you were doing. I and my
fellow
Pontiffs accept this, simply withdraw your declaration, and let the games
begin.

Valete
Q*FABIVS*MAXIMVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9329 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Veto (WAS: Re: Political Statements)
Salve Honorable Senator Augur

Would I know if a veto can be used against a Will Declaration?

As in Title IV, Section A, chapter 5.a, Aediles can "Issue those
edicta (edicts) necessary to see to the conduct of public games and
other festivals and gatherings";
This seems to me a possible vetoed action, but I see that the
Declaration made *Is Not* an Edicta. Otherwise, I wouldn't disagree
for the possible veto.
But in this case, I ask again: Is it possible to use a veto against a
Will Declaration (And I mean a FREEDOM FOR SPEECH case)??

vale bene,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Equitius" <vergil@s...>
wrote:
> Pontifex Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus Augur Omnibus Quiritibus SPD
>
> I call upon the Consules, Praetores, Aediles Curules to veto
the "MEGALESIA> LUDI: Joint Declaration II" in it's present form
which expresses political> sentiments at the expense of the game's
real intent. The Ludi are to please> the> Gods, not men.
> Let the call for the games (Ludi) be reissued in a more appropriate
manner.
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
__
>
> Message: 22
> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:51:02 -0800 (PST)
> From: "L. Sicinius Drusus" <lsicinius@y...>
> Subject: Re: Political Statements or just sensible words?
>
> Sensible Words?
> No It's an example of the Brain Dead Feelgoodism that
> the mindless sheep in the apeasement movement bleat
> out.
>
> If the sacred games are going to become a forum for
> moronic politics, instead of honoring the Gods, then
> it's time to reconsider my membership in an
> organization that has a flipant and impius view of the
> Gods.
>
> --- "L. Didius Geminus Sceptius" <sceptia@y...>
> wrote:
> > Salvete omnes.
> >
> >
> > >>If you are going to make a political stand, then
> > do so openly, you will then get some respect along
> > with the disagreement.
> >
> > SCEPTIVS: If I had to make a political statement
> > referred to the current war, it wouldn't be here in
> > this Forum just because it is not the accurate place
> > to do so.
> > I have signed and support that Declaration because I
> > do believe that my words can be distressing for
> > those who suffer now or ever -if I take care of
> > them. Much more nowdays, of course, but sensible and
> > sensitive people as I do consider myself try to
> > avoid painful words to those who can suffer from
> > them.
> > I do not pretend anybody to agree with me on that,
> > but just respect because CONCORDIA is one of the
> > most beautiful virtues of Rome. It brought many
> > conquers far away from battles.
> >
> > Respectfully,
> >
> > L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> > removed]
> >
> >
>
>
> =====
> L. Sicinius Drusus
>
> Roman Citizen
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
__
>
> Message: 24
> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 21:24:35 EST
> From: qfabiusmaxmi@a...
> Subject: Re: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration II
>
> Salvete...
> The problem with being eight hours behind Spain makes posting timely
> rebuttals in the Forum rather hard. So I ask the citizens'
forbearance if
> they have heard this all before from the other Pontiffs.
> > fraelov@y... writes:
> >
> > > > There will be neither dead Gladiators nor Racers, and the
> > Naumachiae > won't have a single dead > sailor.
> > >
> > > That's absurd. Repeat after me. This is virtual! No other
> > military gaming > societies or reenactments through out the world
has
> > canceled their events, > nor should they. While the war in Iraq
is
> > tragic, it has nothing to do with > Nova Roma, and I believe you
have
> > over reacted when such over reaction is > completely unwarranted.
> >
> > SCEPTIVS: Humbly, Senator, I won't "repeat after you" because
this is
> > not a ludicrous declaration. We asked for respect, and maybe this
> > word was misunderstanding, but I'll clarify it if possible.
> > Due to the Joint Declaration of our current Consularii Nova Roma
is
> > Neutral to this war. We the team for the Ludi Megalesia has the
duty
> > of making the games to entertain the citizenship but as
individuals
> > we have also a mind and the will of not spreading the seeds for
> > violence.
> >
> Humbly? Sceptius you are not being serious. NR has declared
neutrality
> during
> this War! You are a magistrate of NR. By favoring "peace" in our
games you
> have abandoned our neutrality. Is that not clear to you? This is
not your
> call. If the College and the Pontifix Maximus had changed our pact
with the
> Gods, you would
> have been the first to know. I cannot explain this any clearer
that.
> You are not humble. You are arrogant. You have gone against the
wishes of
> the consules and by inference the wishes of the people who elected
the
> consules.
> Why can't you see that you are making a political statement?
>
> Respect is taking this as a team-declaration in which you can be
agree
> > or disagree, but never tell it is an "Absurd."
>
> Absurd in this case is the Aediles engaging in a political
statement, when
> policy for State
> is already decided, and the religious policy as well.
>
> >
> > > You have brought a political statement, into a venue that does
not
> > > need such political statements. I see that you are all running
for
> > > magistracies.
> >
> > SCEPTIVS: Not at all, Senator. What are we running for? The most
of
> > all hold an office, and we are in April. So may I suggest that
there
> > is a demagogic will in your political statement?
> >
>
> I'm talking about next year. The Aedileship is but a stepping
stone on the
> cursus honorum.
> In Nova Roma to be elected is the result of a popularity contest.
You have
> just made yourselves very popular with the anti war people.
>
> Look, I just think you made an innocent mistake, Sceptius, I am
against this
> war as well, but I'd never fashion an anti war statement where I
would
> condone impiety. As a Pontiff of Nova Roma I cannot. I took an
oath. As
> did you. But you are not honoring our Gods. You are mocking them.
>
> I hope you reconsider your ban of eliminating your blood sports, as
we
> cannot
> carry
> out an appeasement without them. And that is what this Ludi is for.
> Appeasement to the Goddess. If you are unwilling, the College of
Pontiffs
> will be forced to take other steps. I trust all the Aediles will
reflect on
> my words, and realize that while your intentions were noble, your
> understanding of the seriousness of your actions was not.
>
> To sum up:
> You made policy, when it is not your job to do so.
> You have disdained our reciprocal pact with the Gods.
> You did this innocently, not understanding what you were doing. I
and my
> fellow
> Pontiffs accept this, simply withdraw your declaration, and let the
games
> begin.
>
> Valete
> Q*FABIVS*MAXIMVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9330 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Racial prejudice in Rome - scattered thoughts
G. Iulius Scaurus Cn. Iulio Straboni salutem dicit.

Salve, Cn. Iuli propinque.

Scripsisti:

> "Antoninus belonged to three races; and he possessed none of their
virtues
> at all, but combined in himself all their vices; the fickleness,
cowardice,
> and recklessness of Gaul were his, the harshness and cruelty of
Africa, and
> the craftiness of Syria, whence he was sprung on his mother's side."
(Dio
> 78.6)

What Greek noun is being translated here as "races"? I don't have a
copy of Dio Cassius at home, so I can 't immediately check (and the
English of Loeb-series translations often has a quaintly antiquarian
flavour to it). There are several Greek words that could be
translated as "race": _ethnos_ (a people with a shared culture),
_phulon_ (from a common race, class, or tribe), _genos_ (kind,
origin), _gonos_ (of a common biological descent), _rhiza_ (from a
common root or origin), or _sperma_ (of a common origin or descent).
_Phulon_ is one word that sometimes has racial connotations similar to
the racial-prejudice sense of the word, as in such such prejoratives
as _pamphulos_ (of mixed/mingled races, half-breed, perhaps even with
resonances of the loathesome Nazi term "Mischling"). One of the
problems with translation is that the English word "race" has a much
wider semantic field than some of the Greek words it translates.

I do, however, agree that Roman society was more tolerant of racial
differences in general than modernity has tended to be. What I was
trying to point out in my initial post on this topic was that the
roseate view of Sherwin-White's book has been nuanced by more recent
research which does identify significant phenomena in Roman antiquity
which are analogous to modern attitudes of racial prejudice.

Vale.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9331 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Megalesia affair
In a message dated 4/5/03 5:16:36 AM Pacific Standard Time, fraelov@...
writes:


> Well, thank you all for your attenction. Please, live quietly in this
> tragical time. Have a funny festival and pray Magna Mater for a world
> of peace. I hope you enjoy Megalesia Ludi.
>
> I come back to the bed, my tooth is very very hurting and I'm tired.
>

I'll light a candle to Asculapius for your pain, Aedile. I do hope you feel
better.

I realize that you believe you are operating in an unoffical status, and your
declaration
is not political. But any declaration you make especially with your title
becomes political.
I am sorry you cannot see that. Pity.

I take it you still intend to hold bloodless games?
If so, I and the College will have to take additional steps. Sorry it had to
come to this.

And "funny" in English means humorous. You might pick a better word.

FABIVS


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9332 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
G. Iulius Scaurus S.P.D.

Avete, Quirites.

I suspect that this is the last time I'll use "Greek fonts on Yahoo"
as a subject line :-). And, seriously, I have no desire to step into
any disagreement between L. Cornelius Sulla and C. Minucius Scaevola,
but I do have a question about Novaroman law. In historical Roman law
a praetor urbanus could not adjudicate a violation of the law by a
citizen unless an actio was presented by a citizen (in effect, all
criminal actiones were private actiones). From something said in this
thread I infer that a Novaroman praetor can take action against a
citizen for a violation of law without an actio being presented by
another citizen to that praetor. Is this inference correct?

Valete, Quirites.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9333 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: Greek fonts on Yahoo
Salvete Quirites; et salve, C. Iuli Scaure.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gregory Rose" <gfr@i...> wrote:

<<snipped>>

> In historical Roman law a praetor urbanus could not adjudicate a
> violation of the law by a citizen unless an actio was presented by
> a citizen (in effect, all criminal actiones were private
> actiones). From something said in this thread I infer that a
> Novaroman praetor can take action against a citizen for a violation
> of law without an actio being presented by another citizen to that
> praetor. Is this inference correct?

A pretty good question.
The law that deals with that subject is the Lex Salicia Iudiciaria.
You can find it at:
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-11-24-iii.html
Please take a look at it and let me know your opinion :-).

CN·SALIX·ASTVR·T·F·A·NEP·TRIB·OVF
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 9334 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2003-04-05
Subject: Re: MEGALESIA LUDI: Joint Declaration II
G. Iulius Scaurus S.P.D.

Avete, Quirites.

I would like to clarify a few points in this matter of the Megalesia Ludi.

First, I do not believe for the moment that the curule aediles or
their cohors have sought to curry favor with those citizens who oppose
the war in Iraq. I am myself an American who is deeply opposed to my
country's invasion of Iraq; indeed, sufficiently opposed to have spent
much of this past morning standing with a sign in my hands in front of
the Federal Building in my city, demanding an end to the war. And I
was one who questioned the decision to "sanitize" the Ludi.

Second, I believe that the curule aediles and their cohors acted in
good faith in hope of alleviating any possible discomfort on the part
of their fellow Quirites. I have not long been a civis novaromanus,
but I have read the archives here and I see no reason in that history
to question their motives or integrity.

Third, I disagree with the decision of the curule aediles because I
believe that deviating from the mos maiorum in any matter involving
the religio romana except for the gravest of reasons is contrary to
the principles on which Nova Roma was founded and on which it recruits
citizens.

Fourth, I respectfully request that the curule aediles consult the
pontifices and augures before they implement their decision so as to
avoid any possible, UNINTENTIONAL impietas in the matter of the
Megalesia Ludi.

Fifth, I beseech my fellow civites to recall their dignitas and say
nothing in the heat of the moment that they may regret on calmer
reflection. Our magistrates and their cohortes are not hostes; their
contributions to Nova Roma are worthy of our deep respect.

Valete, Quirites.

G. Iulius Scaurus