M IVL PERVSIANVS QVIRITIBVS SPD
avete omnes,
today is, as proclaimed by our Senior Aedile Franciscus Apulus Caesar, the
archeological day dedicated to the Magna Mater and her temple on the Palatine
hill, Rome. This is a report I've written these last days. In a few days
a more friendly version will be published (with pictures and links) on FAC
Cohors site.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
One year later, what?s going on?
Almost one year has passed since my first recognition to the area of the
temple, on the Palatine hill. Since then I have learned a lot about this
topic, and most of all, I was appointed to follow this project on the behalf
of Cohors Aedelis of Franciscus Apulus Caesar.
Last year, as Scriba ad Historiam Provinciae Italiae I provided a first
report to Cohors Aedilis Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
(See at
http://italia.novaroma.org/cohorsaedilis/ludi/templemagnamater.htm).
What did we figure out last year? All the south-west area of the Palatine
hill is the object, since 1977, of systematic surveying directed by Professor
Patrizio Pensabene Perez (with the collaboration of numerous graduated and
students of the Department of Archaeological and Anthropological Historical
Sciences of the University of Rome "La Sapienza"). Unfortunately it is still
not possible to visit that area as it remains all fenced and under restoration.
At the entrance of the area there is still a sign stating jobs of removal
of asbestos materials in progress.
A telephone call with Soprintendenza Archeologica di Roma, made two weeks
ago has confirmed this situation.
What is changed now, one year after? Well, this report is more aimed to
the archeological news about the temple. We feel like having as much information
as possible about the temple as in a few weeks we look forward to a big
event.
I think I?m not wrong if I say that for the first time Nova Roma is having
a contact with the managers of a Roman monument.
Later this month Propraetor Italiae and myself, together with other Italic
citizens, will have an appointment with D.sa Irene Iacopi, managing director
of Roman Forum and Palatine archeological areas, to offer our economical
help to preserve the temple and any other kind of possible relations. The
creation of an Aedilian fund is also aimed to this purpose. It?s our intention
to understand better what both sides can earn. There are some possibilities
enlisted by the Italian law, which allows private citizens, alone or associated,
to collaborate with the Ministero per i Beni e le attività culturali (for
cultural assets and activities) as written in the Decreto legislativo 368/98,
art.10, comma 1.
Questions of importance are as follows:
a. What are the rules for fundraising?
b. What forms of control are needed?
c. What merits could Nova Roma display?
The Soprintendenza Archeologica di Roma, addressed in Piazza S.Maria in
Nova 53, will hold the meeting on April 14 (
http://www.archeorm.arti.beniculturali.it/sar2000,
email:
info@...).
The History of Magna Mater
The Cult of Magna Mater, the Great Mother, is probably the oldest religion
of all. The earliest stone-age sculptures depict the mother- goddess, as
an idol found in Catal Hüyük, six thousands years old. In a later form she
became a seated woman flanked by two leopards. The area of the Aegean Sea
and especially the Cretan Isle, organized by a matriarchal order during
the prehistoric age, adored a Mother Goddess as dispenser of fecundity.
She was adored as Cybele, worshipped with this name in Greece, Phrygia and
Anatolia. On the banks of the Euphrates as Koubaba and near the Babylonians
as Damkina, which means "married with the earth and the sky". Other names
were Gaia, Ga or Ge (from greek Mother Earth), Terra (in Latin) and Gatumdu
(her Sumerian name); she was also called Ishtar in Akkadia and finally Isis
in Egypt, not saying that behind her name there was also the oriental goddess
Shub-Niggurath.
In nearly all creation myths of all cultures she appears to be the eternal,
not born, just existing from the beginning of time. She gives the earth
its shape. She is the bearer of the world and the population of this planet
(plants, animals and humans).
The Romans identified this goddess with the Greek Rhea, and called her the
Magna Mater, the Great Mother.
Although the priests of the cult were men who had castrated themselves in
front of her image, but most of the followers were women. They worshipped
the goddess in different temples, independent each other, although some
temples had more influence than others did. They were mainly in Phrygia,
Greece and Italy.
In Pessinus, in northern Asia, a simulacrum of the divinity was worshipped:
one black stone of conical shape, probably a meteorite. Another major temple
was in Delphi, which was later re-consecrated to Apollo and became much
more famous for his oracle.
In each temple the High Priestess had the greatest status, followed by the
Archigalli. Below in status was the ordinary priestesses and lowest the
galli.
The Roman Magna Mater
The Second Punic War had put in crisis the republican Rome and its religious
structure too. In the attempt of recovering the support of the Gods, which
appeared to be lost, the cult of the Magna Mater was introduced in 204 BC,
after the consultation of the Sibylline Books.
It?s also believed that the patricians imported the cult of Magna Mater
explicitly so that their social class would have a goddess that served some
of the functions that Ceres did for the plebeians. As a result, there was
sharp antagonism between the two cults, becoming rivals separated only by
the social classes they served. The same year the temple of Magna Mater
was dedicated, a new festival dedicated to Ceres was established. This festival
was called the Ieinium Cereris, and may have represented a plebeian response
to the new patrician goddess.
The embassy was sent to the king of Pergamus, in which territory the sanctuary
was located. Having obtained the delivery of the simulacrum, it was then
carried and loaded on a ship to Rome. The simulacrum was one pointed black
stone of conical shape, called acus, which represented the goddess. On its
arrival it was welcomed into the city by a vir optimus, or best man, selected
from one of the most distinguished patrician families. The matrons that
escorted the goddess on the road from Ostia to Rome were entirely drawn
from the patrician class. Since its arrival in Rome until the completation
of an appropriated temple, the black stone was kept in the temple of Victory
(the Aedes Victoriae), on the western side of the Palatine hill.
(Livy Ab urbe condita XXIX.37.2; XXXVI.36)
Between 204 and 191 BC the sanctuary was built in the same area in order
to receive the acus. Probably that place was chosen also because of the
proximity to the cave of the recovery of the twins, the Lupercale, as mountains
and caves were sacred to the Magna Mater, and her temples were often built
near them in the tradition. It was dedicated on April 11 191 BC, by the
praetor Marcus Iunius Brutus, on which occasion the ludi Megalenses, or
Megalesia, were instituted and celebrated in front of the temple (Livy loc.
cit.; Fast. Praen. ap. Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum I". p. 235, 314-315,
cf. p. 251=VI. 32498; Fast. Ant. ap. NS 1921, 91; Cicero de har. resp. 24;
cf. for site Ovidius Fast. II. 55; Martial VII.73.3).
In 111 BC there was a first fire in the Temple of the Magna Mater when the
statue of Quinta Cloelia within the temple was uninjured. It was caused
by the aedile Quintus Memmius, who took with him the black stone.
The temple was restored by Metellus Numidicus, consul in 110 BC, and the
cult resumed in an official and pacific version.
Burned again in 3 BC, it was destroyed by mysterious circumstances.
Augustus restored it in 3 AD. He also showed his closeness to the Religio
of Cybele (the other name commonly used in Rome) and his wife Livia was
resembled to the goddess. This worship has a large growing since the end
of the Imperial era (or since the interdiction of the paganism). After that
the traces of the cult of the black stone were lost.
(Val. Max. I.8.II; Obseq. 99; Ovidius Fast.IV. 347-348; Mon. Anc.IV.8)
According to writings about Roman Regiones, the temple was still standing
unharmed in the fourth century (Not.Reg.X).
During Roman History there are other references by classic authors:
- The temple is found in Cassius Dio (XLVIII.43.4), Juvenal (IX.23) as a
place of assignation, and in the third century (Hist. Aug. Claud. 4; Aurel.
I).
- The stone needle itself is described by a late writer (Arnob. adv. gentes
vii. 49) as small and set in a silver statue of the goddess (cf. Herodianus
ab exc. d. Marci i. II; Arnob. v. 5). It was perhaps removed by Elagabalus
to his temple (q.v.) on the Palatine (Hist. Aug. Elag. 3; cf. LR 134-138;
but cf. BC 1883, 211; HJ 53-54, n. 44).
Archaeological evidences of the temple
At the top of the Scalae Caci and behind the area of the Romulean huts,
on the southwestern corner of the Palatine, stand the ruins of the ancient
temple. Nowadays only a large brick box is visible in a squared work with
a staircase inside, on which a small wood of elm-oaks has grown.
These ruins consist of a massive podium made of irregular pieces of volcanic
tufo and peperino laid in thick mortar, and fragments of columns and entablature.
The building presents its own guideline (NorthEast - SouthWest, which was
decided by cultural reasons), different from the previous one of 191 BC.
Moreover a great courtyard occupied a large portion of the front space and
the western area of the temple, while to the East eased a connection with
the area of the nearby temple of Victory.
All this was inside of a wide rectangular area closed on the west flank
of the temple. This is because the courtyard had to be classified for a
specific function, probably connected to the theatrical events of the Ludi.
The structure shows the need of great bathtubs for the rituals of the cult.
The priests of Magna Mater used these when they washed her image in the
sacred waters of the Almon River during the festivals of the Goddess.
The temple by Augustus (the last version and how we see it today) was created
on a high base with big steps. The great concrete podium which, with the
foundations laying directly on the cliff of the Palatine, was 9 Mts. (29.5
feet) high. With the reconstruction of temple by concrete and the elevation
of the courtyard, the squared bathtub and the accessing angled scales were
obliterated. A new great rectangular concrete basin (16,50 x 3 Mts., 54.13
x 9.8 feet) was constructed in the West area of the podium of the temple.
It is evident that the restoration of that period was carried out using
materials from the original structure.
The dimensions of the podium are 33,40 x 19,35 Mts. (110 x 63 feet). The
walls are 3,84 Mts. (12.60 feet) thick on the sides and 5,50 Mts. (18.04
feet) in the rear, but this unusual thickness is due to the fact that the
rear wall is double, with an air space, 1,80 Mts. (5.91 feet) wide, between
the two parts. This wall was faced on the outside with stucco, not with
opus quadratum. The walls of the cell were somewhat thinner than the podium
ones, forming a smaller rectangle (32 x 64 Mts. = 105 x 210 feet), lying
on a high covered base with lava stone blocks. From the rear wall of the
cell projects the base of a pedestal on which the stone needle probably
stood.
While the previous described is the wider consideration, there is considerable
divergence of opinion as to the date of the podium: some attribute it to
110 BC, and believe that the architectural members were given only a new
coat of stucco under Augustus. Fiechter assigns the whole to the middle
of the first century BC, but it does not seem at all necessary to suppose
that Augustus would not have used peperino coated with stucco.
There weren't columns on the sides (prostylos) but only six columns (hexastylos)
in the front of the Corinthian order. And a plinth in masonry for the cult
of the statue, was placed perhaps in the inside of a sacellum on the bottom
wall (as said before). It was approached by a flight of steps extending
entirely across the front. The relationship between cell, pronao and front
body is 4:2:1. The rest of masonry are in opus reticulata and built after
the fire of 111 BC: the columns in lava stone lying beside podium are of
Augustan age. On the forehead of the pronao a terrace, supported by parallels
walls on turf made blocks, datable to III century BC. For following generations
this last structure was likely reused for several shops. They were placed
on a covered inner path that crossed the area.
Is this the real temple of Magna Mater?
Such a reconstruction has been confirmed as a relief of the first imperial
age that reproduces a procession in the front of the temple. This relief
is now at Villa Medici in Rome (
http://www.villamedici.it/). This temple
was formerly attributed to the Ara Pacis.
This is commonly thought to be the temple of Magna Mater owing to an identification
of a coin of the elder Faustina (not possible to see the picture.) This
represents a temple of the Corinthian order, with curved roof, and a flight
of steps on which is a statue of Cybele with a turreted crown enthroned
between lions.
Recent diggings have characterized, to the east of the temple, the foundations
and the rests of the podium of another temple identified as the one of the
Victory. It was built in 294 BC by Consul Lucius Postumius Megellus and
to which Marcus Porcius Cato in the 193 BC added a place dedicated to the
Victoria Virgo. As said there was conserved the acus previously.
Inscriptions and objects found in the area make it extremely probable, if
not for sure.
Inscriptions referring to Magna Mater, especially one with a dedication
to the M(ater) D(eum) M(agna) I(daea), goddess of Mount Ida, a mount in
Phrygia by Pessinunt.
(CIL VI. 496, 1040, 3702= 30967; NS 1896, 186; cf. CIL XII.405),
Also found was a portion of a colossal female figure seated on a throne
and a fragment of a base with the paws of lions, the regular attendants
of the goddess.
Diggings are supposed to have recovered several votive terracotta of the
first age of the temple. Thanks to them many interesting aspects of the
cult have been cleared, like the importance of the spring celebration during
the equinox.
To say the least, a story says that in some cases hidden somewhere would
be located the acus, the famous black stone, itself recovered during the
diggings.
NR declaration & edict about the MM project
Nova Roma has shown its duty toward the temple of Magna Mater through two
main acts.
JOINT DECLARATIO ABOUT THE TEMPLE OF MAGNA MATER IN ROMA
March 8 2002
I. Senior Curule Aedile Caeso Fabius Quintilianus (Aedilian site, Thule
site), Honorable Caius Cornelius Puteanus (Germania Inferior site), Honorable
Claudia Cornelia (Germania Inferior site), Illustrus Franciscus Apulus Caesar
(Italia site), Honorable Caius Curius Saturninus (Finnicae site), Honorable
Emilia Curia Finnica (Finnicae site and Academia site), Illustrus Antonius
Gryllus Graecus (Lusitania site), Illustra Iulia Cocceia and Illustrus Sextus
Apollonius Scipio (Gallia site) have formed an alliance to further the correct
restoration and care for the Temple of Magna Mater in Rome.
II. Each of the above promise to place a picture of the Temple of Magna
Mater in Rome on "their" Nova Roman web-site (Aedilian,
Provincial or Regional) with an inquiry asking all that visit their web-site
to contribute to the correct restoration and care of the Temple of Magna
Mater in Rome. The web-site shall also have the address of the Propraetor
of Italia, so that it is possible to contact him to send funds to him to
enable Provincia Italia to execute this joint promise. This web-page shall
be designed by Illustrus Franciscus Apulus Caesar and made available by
him to all the co-signers of this declaratio.
Signed in March the 8th, in the year of the consulship of Marcus
Octavius Germanicus and Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, 2755 AUC. by:
Senior Curule Aedile Caeso Fabius Quintilianus,
Illustrus Franciscus Apulus Caesar,
Honorable Caius Curius Saturninus,
Honorable Emilia Curia Finnica,
Illustrus Antonius Gryllus Graecus,
Illustra Iulia Cocceia,
Sextus Apollonius Scipio.
EDICTVM PROPRAETORICVM V - REFECTIO TEMPLI MAGNAE MATRIS
May 7 2002
Italian version:
Ex Officio Propraetoris Provinciae Italiae
I. Con Questo Edictum la Provincia Italia ribadisce ufficialmente l'impegno
assunto nella JOINT DECLARATIO ABOUT THE TEMPLE OF MAGNA MATER IN ROMA promossa
dalla Cohors Aedilis di Caeso Fabius Quintilianus, firmata dal Propraetor
in carica e visionabile all'indirizzo
http://italia.novaroma.org/cohorsaedilis/ludi/megalesia/temple.htm
II. La Provincia Italia istituirà un fondo, con le modalità ritenute più
convenienti, per la ricezione della donazioni provenienti dai cittadini
di Nova Roma a favore della ricostruzione e della manutenzione delle rovine
del Tempio di Magna Mater sul Palatino a Roma.
III. Per favorire la pubblicità del progetto al più ampio pubblico, sarÃ
predisposto un apposito sito Internet all'interno di
http://italia.novaroma.org
contenente tutte le informazioni storiche sul tempio, i dati per la ricezione
delle donazioni e gli aggiornamenti sull'andamento dei lavori.
IV. La Provincia Italia designerà un magistrato provinciale come responsabile
del progetto. Egli dovrà ricercare notizie storiche ed archeologiche sul
Tempio di Magna Mater, curare i contatti con i donatori e con gli enti pubblici
manutentori delle rovine, conservare i fondi raccolti ed individuare un'associazione
o ente locale per la manutenzione del Tempio.
Egli sarà anche il supervisore per Nova Roma dell'andamento dei lavori.
Altri magistrati provinciali potranno essere coinvolti nel progetto a supporto
del responsabile.
V. Questo Edictum ha effetto immediato. Promulgato alle Nonis Maiis MMDCCLVI
a.u.c. (May 7, 2002), nell'anno del Consolato di Marcus Octavius Germanicus
e Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix.
VI. Questo Edictum ha l'approvazione della Curia Italica (04/05/2002,
http://italia.novaroma.org/curia/r30042002.txt)
Curiae Post Scriptum: Il Propraetor Provinciae Italiae, quando lo riterrÃ
opportuno, emanerà un Edictum contenente le indicazioni precise relative
all'Ente che si occuperà dell'opera di restauro e alle modalità di raccolta
delle offerte di denaro a favore del progetto.
Franciscus Apulus Caesar
Propraetor Provinciae Italiae
English version:
I. With this Edictum, Provincia Italia officially undertake the commitment
expressed in the JOINT DECLARATIO ABOUT THE TEMPLE OF MAGNA MATER IN ROMA,
promoted by Cohors Aedilis of Caeso Fabius Quintilianus, and signed by our
current Propraetor (see at
http://italia.novaroma.org/cohorsaedilis/ludi/megalesia/temple.htm)
II. Provincia Italia will create a fund, following the most convenient methods,
to receive money from Nova Roma citizens explicitly given for the restoration
and management of the ruins of the Temple of Magna Mater on the Palatine
hill, Rome.
III. A new Internet site at
http://italia.novaroma.org will be created to
advertise the project, to let it be known to as much as people are possible.
It will contain all the historical information about the temple, data about
fundraising and update about the working progress.
IV. Provincia Italia will appoint a provincial magistrate as responsible
of the project. He shall research historical and archeological news about
the Temple of Magna Mater, paying attention to the money givers and keeping
contacts with public organisms managing the ruins, saving money raised and
finding an association or local administration for the restoring the Temple.
He will be also a supervisor for Nova Roma about the restoration and other
kind of works. Other provincial magistrates could be involved in the project
in the future to support the supervisor.
V. This Edictum is immediately valid. Given in the Nonis Maiis MMDCCLVI
a.u.c. (May 7, 2002), in the year of the Consulship of Marcus Octavius Germanicus
and Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix.
VI. This Edictum has the approval of Curia Italica (04/05/2002,
http://italia.novaroma.org/curia/r30042002.txt)
Curiae Post Scriptum: Propraetor Provinciae Italiae, up to his own decision,
will emanate an Edictum with the right indications about the administration
which is going to restore the monument, about rules for fundraising about
this project.
Franciscus Apulus Caesar
Propraetor Provinciae Italiae
Useful licteral sources
Samuel Ball Platner,
A Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome.
(London: Humphrey Milford. Oxford University Press. 1929)
Pensabene Patrizio,
Scavi nell'area del tempio della Vittoria e del santuario della Magna Mater
sul Palatino
(Rome: Archeologia Laziale IX, 1989)
Lynn E. Roller,
In Search of God the Mother The Cult of Anatolian Cybele (Berkeley-Los Angeles:
University of California Press, 1999)
Sites & articles
Magna Mater, The Great mother
(
http://inanna.virtualave.net/mother.html)
Sophia Eva Kharis? site at
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Olympus/2179/magna_mater.htm
By Anders Sandberg at
http://hem.bredband.net/arenamontanus/Mage/magna.html
By Alicia Ashby at
http://students.roanoke.edu/groups/relg211/ashby/Index.html
Marcus Iulius Perusianus
-------------------------
Scriba ad historiam Provinciae Italiae
Scriba Aedilis Historicus Primus
Scriba Curatoris Differum
-------------------------
http://www.geocities.com/m_iulius
http://italia.novaroma.org
http://italia.novaroma.org/fac
-------------------------
AEQVAM MEMENTO REBVS IN ARDVIS SERVARE MENTEM