Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Jul 2-4, 2003

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12491 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: groups to add to poll
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12492 From: M. Octavius Solaris Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: The Grudge
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12493 From: Kyrene Ariadne Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: [[Nova-Roma] Re: groups to add to poll]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12494 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: "Xtian" (WAS: Tha Back Alley)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12495 From: labienus@novaroma.org Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: groups to add to poll
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12496 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12497 From: lucius_lucillus_catiline Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Word Origins / Latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12498 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: XMAS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12499 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: PROJECT OF MAGNA MATER: news
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12500 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Advertising in the Eagle & a suggestion !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12501 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: [[Nova-Roma] Re: groups to add to poll]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12502 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12503 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Augustus: Conservative, Liberal, or Moderate?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12504 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: groups to add to religion poll
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12505 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Augustus: Conservative, Liberal, or Moderate?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12506 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12507 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Augustus: Conservative, Liberal, or Moderate?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12508 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: groups to add to religion poll
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12509 From: Sp. Postumius Tubertus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Census
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12510 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Faction v. Fiction
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12511 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: New poll for Nova-Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12512 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: New poll for Nova-Roma(Avocation)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12513 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: New poll for Nova-Roma(Avocation)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12514 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Word Origins / Latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12515 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: New poll for Nova-Roma (Religion, not Avocation)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12516 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: A new revised and more historical "Lex Fabia de Ratione Comitiorum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12517 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Census
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12518 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12519 From: Sp. Postumius Tubertus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Census
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12520 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12521 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: New poll for Nova-Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12522 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Christian and Xtian (was Re: The Back Alley)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12523 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12524 From: Sp. Postumius Tubertus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12525 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12526 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12527 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12528 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12529 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12530 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12531 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: "Xtian" (WAS: Tha Back Alley)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12532 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12533 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: "Xtian" (WAS: Tha Back Alley)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12534 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: The Religion Poll
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12535 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12536 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Nova Roma Census
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12537 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12538 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12539 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12540 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12541 From: Paula Drennan Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: The Religion Poll
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12542 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12543 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12544 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12545 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12546 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Resignations - a few thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12547 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: The Religion Poll
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12548 From: G¥IVLIVS¥SCAVRVS Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: The Grudge
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12549 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: New poll for Nova-Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12550 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12551 From: aoctaviaindagatrix Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: "Xtian" (WAS: Tha Back Alley)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12552 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12553 From: G¥IVLIVS¥SCAVRVS Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12554 From: Gaius Galerius Peregrinator Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: participles
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12555 From: G¥IVLIVS¥SCAVRVS Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Harris on Philology
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12556 From: Sp. Postumius Tubertus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12557 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12558 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12559 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12560 From: Laureatus Armoricus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Resignations - a few thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12561 From: Franciscus Apulus Caesar Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12562 From: G¥IVLIVS¥SCAVRVS Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: participles
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12563 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12564 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12565 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: "Xtian" (WAS: Tha Back Alley)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12566 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12567 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley/ political correctness/ word definitions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12568 From: Paula Drennan Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: The Religion Poll
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12569 From: Tiberius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: The Senate is now in session
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12570 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Word Origins / Latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12571 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12572 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12573 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12574 From: Gaius Galerius Peregrinator Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12575 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley Xian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12576 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12577 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: "Xtian" (WAS: Tha Back Alley)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12578 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Resignations - a few thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12579 From: philippusflaviusconservatusmaior Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Word Origins
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12580 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: The Senate is now in session
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12581 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Religious Reform was The Religion Poll
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12582 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12583 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12584 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Hiatus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12585 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12586 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12587 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12588 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12589 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12590 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12591 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12592 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12593 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12594 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12595 From: Michael Loughlin Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley/ political correctness/ word definitions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12596 From: Julilla Sempronia Magna Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: The Gods smile upon the Great Champion of Rome!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12597 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12598 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: The Gods smile upon the Great Champion of Rome!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12599 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12600 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Results of Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12601 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Faction v. Fiction
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12602 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: A more historical "Lex Fabia de Ratione Comitie .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12603 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Gladitorial Combat
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12604 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12605 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: A more historical "Lex Fabia de Ratione Comitie .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12606 From: Gaius Galerius Peregrinator Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12607 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Results of Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12608 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Gladitorial Combat
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12609 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12610 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12611 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Personal ethics - was Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12612 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12613 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Sorry Marinus! Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12614 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Sorry Marinus! Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12615 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Christian, Xtian, "ExLax", or XLax.....Ex (Xactly) was Religio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12616 From: deciusiunius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12617 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Christian, Xtian, "ExLax", or XLax.....Ex (Xactly) was Religio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12618 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Personal ethics - was Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12619 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Christian, Xtian, "ExLax", or XLax.....Ex (Xactly) was Religio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12620 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Personal ethics - was Tha Back Alley
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12621 From: zak29577 Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Results of Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12622 From: Christine Schofield Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Chariot Racing
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12623 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Results of Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12624 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Christian, Xtian, "ExLax", or XLax.....Ex (Xactly) was Religio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12625 From: zak29577 Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Results of Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12626 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Results of Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12627 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Let us Not....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12628 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Christian, Xtian, "ExLax", or XLax.....Ex (Xactly) was Religio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12629 From: zak29577 Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Results of Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12630 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12631 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Censors and Senators
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12632 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Censors and Senators
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12633 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Censors and Senators
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12634 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12635 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12636 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12637 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12638 From: M Flavius Aurelius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Results of Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12639 From: Tiberius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12640 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12641 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: The Gauntlet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12642 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12643 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: The Gauntlet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12644 From: M Flavius Aurelius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: List Administration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12645 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12646 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: The Gauntlet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12647 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: The Gauntlet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12648 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: A more historical "Lex Fabia de Ratione Comitie .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12649 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: The Gauntlet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12650 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Censors and Senators
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12651 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Censors and Senators
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12652 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: The Gauntlet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12653 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: Censors and Senators
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12654 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: Censors and Senators
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12655 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: Censors and Senators
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12656 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: List Administration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12657 From: G¥IVLIVS¥SCAVRVS Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Römische Inschriften in Germanien
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12658 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12659 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12660 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12661 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12662 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: groups to add to religion poll
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12663 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: The Gauntlet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12664 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: Results of Senate Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12665 From: philippusflaviusconservatusmaior Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: alternatio de disceptatione....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12666 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: Results of Senate Vote



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12491 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: groups to add to poll
then 3 polls one for the churchs one for the wiccan and one for the
other pagans ?













--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@m...>
wrote:
> Salve Marcus Cornelius Felix
>
> But the yahoo groups limit us to 25 responses I did the best I
could . I listed RR and other "Pagan" I also included a
Other/DK /Decline space.
>
> Vale
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: wuffa2001
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 1:04 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] groups to add to poll
>
>
> well then if you going make a list
> You need to add ( as i know there are people in Novaroma
> who are in the
> Chaldean Catholic Church
> Armenian Orthodox Church
> Assyrian Church of the East
> High-Catholic Church of England( not rome)
> then there is the people under His Holiness The Catholicos of the
> East (Patriarch of Antioch and All the East)
> The Malankara Orthodox Church
> Syriac Orthodox Church
> Coptic Eastern Catholic Church
> Byzantine Catholic(non-Orthodox)
> Syro-Malabar Eastern Catholic Church
> then there are all the churchs that are non-3rd to 5th Conciliar
> ( like the Coptic groups)
> then there are the there are the None-magick GNOSTIC groups( NON-
OTO)
> then there are the Esoteric old Catholics groups (The Liberal
> Catholic Church etc..)
> then there are the...
> i could go on BUT you get the point
> now how about them pagani ( I am one {hint})
> do i have to list the 20 kinds of wiccan and the 40 kinds of NON-
> wiccan pagan ( wiccan is a sub-set of pagan )
>
> what i am saying If we are going to count all the kinds of
Churchs
> here in NR
> and i want more then just the line ( other pagan )
>
>
> Marcus Cornelius Felix
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12492 From: M. Octavius Solaris Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: The Grudge
Salve Gai Iuli,

<< I recognise that interrupting a good rant may be in bad taste, >>

MOS: No problem ;).

<< but "dignitas" is precisely _not_ like "paterfamilias." "Dignitas" is a
third declension, feminine noun in the nominative. "Paterfamilias" is
an artifact of the borrowing of a Greek genitive ending into Latin and
the majority of Latin grammarians regard "familias" in this context as
an indeclinable. I posted a more detailed discussion of problems
associated with this word a few days ago. Perhaps philology, too, is
one of those things which people really ought to learn. Of course,
this has nothing to do with the so-called traditionalist vs. modernist
debate (I happen to think that the issues do not precisely break
down that way and that some of them correlate to historical differences
between what might loosely be called optimates and populares in Roma
antiqua). >>

MOS: Oh, I wasn't saying that they belonged to the same declension. I said that <dignitas> and <paterfamilias> was the only correct way of spelling the expression. I wasn't making any grammatical points. Thanks for the explanation anyway, because I have always been a bit unsure what to do with that <-familias>-ending.

So, a borrowed Greek infinitive? Pretty funny for a word that is so typically associated with the Roman way of life! :)

Vale bene!
M. Octavius Solaris


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12493 From: Kyrene Ariadne Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: [[Nova-Roma] Re: groups to add to poll]
"wuffa2001" <holyconelia@...> wrote:
> then 3 polls one for the churchs one for the wiccan and one for the
> other pagans ?

Salve!

Yeah, narrowing down the "Pagans" would help considerably--especially for
those like myself who don't use the term Pagan, given its extreme confusion
with all forms of Wicca. I prefer "Greek polytheist" myself.


Vale,
Andrea Gladia Cyrene





* Kyrene Ariadne / Andrea Gladia Cyrene *
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* Hellenion: http://www.hellenion.org *
* Ai Mystai Greek Mysteries: http://ai-mystai.faithweb.com *
* Temple of Apollon: http://www.TempleApollo.com *
* Temple of Dionysos: http://www.TempleDionysos.com *
* Temple of Aphrodite: http://www.TempleAphrodite.net *
* ICQ:6663573 Yahoo:KyreneAriadne AIM:Kyrene Ariadne *


____________________________________________________________________
This message was sent from my Palm wireless email account.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12494 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: "Xtian" (WAS: Tha Back Alley)
In a message dated 7/2/03 10:18:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
cordus@... writes:


> I was simply trying to point out in a relatively
> light-hearted way that it is possible to object to
> something not because it is offensive but because it
> is incorrect

My dear Apollonius. I do not believe Lucius Cornelius is annoyed with you.
I believe he is annoyed with the PC nature of this discussion to which you
just added an amusing additional brick. In otherwords it is not dying. But
seems to be enduring.

Fabius


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12495 From: labienus@novaroma.org Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: groups to add to poll
Salve

> But the yahoo groups limit us to 25 responses I did the best I could . I
> listed RR and other "Pagan" I also included a Other/DK /Decline space.

Perhaps it would have been better to include only two categories, since the
stated intent of the poll was to establish whether or not Christians were a
minority on the list.

The category that best describes my religion is:
- Christian
- Not Christian

Vale
T Labienus Fortunatus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12496 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
The XP or chi rho - the first two letters of the greek alphabet for
Cristos or christ.
X as in Xian seems to serve the same purpose as X in Xmass.
In no defense or in no antagonism towards anyone, there will always
be one whomever in a group that will find offense at something to
about.
Look at the reform to language with the Womens movement as an
example. Some people find Mailman offensive and you need to say
letter carrier, etc. Not everyone but there will always be one.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Sicinius Drusus"
<lsicinius@y...> wrote:
>
> --- "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@e...>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Also, IME, "Xtian" is often considered an
> > offensive usage.
> >
> > Sulla: Really....where did you come up with that
> > opinion? I would like to know...considering I
> > learned using Xtian during my childhood, from my
> > former preacher (non-denominatial)...who used it
> > quite extensively as an abbreviation when writing on
> > the chalkboard during Sunday Services. Considering
> > that Christian followers usually used the X and P as
> > letters in Jesus's name.
> >
>
> I Have heard claims from fundimentalists that the "X"
> in Xmas is some modern plot to "ex" Christ out of
> Christmas.
>
> "X" or "XP" were been used as abbrevations for Christ
> at least since the time of Constitine, and likely
> longer than that.
>
>
> =====
> L. Sicinius Drusus
>
> Roman Citizen
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12497 From: lucius_lucillus_catiline Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Word Origins / Latin
Salve Quinte


> Apparently in Ancient Greece there was a town called Laconia.

Laconica is a region in the Peleponnese, and home to the city-state
of Sparta (whose lifestyle supposedly also gives us the
term 'spartan', of course :)

Lucius Lucillus Catilina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12498 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: XMAS
Thanks Quintus,
I neglected to state in a similar reply the XP chi rho is still worn
today by many in the clergy -
An elongated P with an X going through the middle.
This and the fish symbol were the symbols for christanity.
The "sign" seen by Constantine during battle across the sun was not a
cross but the Chi Rho symbol for Cristos or as Quintus pointed out
Xristos.
It wasn't until after Constantine as emperor decided to convert the
rest of the empire to cristianity that the cross of Mithras the Sun
God was used.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
> Salvete ye sinners!
>
> Checked the web and:
>
> This abbreviation for Christmas is of Greek origin. The word for
> Christ in Greek is Xristos. During the 16th century, Europeans
began
> using the first initial of Christ's name, "X" in place of the word
> Christ in Christmas as a shorthand form of the word, especially in
> printing forms and calenders. Although the early Christians
> understood that X stood for Christ's name, later Christians who did
> not understand the Greek language mistook "Xmas" as a sign of
> disrespect.
>
> I grew up in the Roman Catholic Church (and I stress, "Roman").
Maybe
> because you had to know Latin to be a priest as well as having some
> exposure to Greek years ago, "I" never heard one complaint from the
> priests or nuns from the church in my lifetime.
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12499 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: PROJECT OF MAGNA MATER: news
So far it is The beginning of October but the actual dates are not
set in stone.
I will definately give you the dates once they are set.
I look forward to our meeting and my visit to Bari.
It has been too long since my last visit and Bari was not on my list
of places to go.
I have yet to even visit Sicily and this trip will finally include
Baveno and the Northern Lakes.
Mille grazie per tutto Piasono,
Non posso aspetare di conoscerti.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Franciscus Apulus Caesar"
<sacro_barese_impero@l...> wrote:
> Salve Ambrosius,
> no, the ruins in the west of the Palatin are under restoring and
the
> hill is closed for a not-determinated time. Now we know the area of
> the Temple of Magna MAter is closed to archeologists too.
> We hope to receive the authorization from the local office
> (Soprintendenza) to a little tour of the Temple.However this
> authorization is not so easy and only a litte group of 15-20
> citizens could visit the Temple.
> Please inform me if you're interesting. Do you come in Italy in
> October, is it right?
>
> Vale
> Fr. Apulus Caesar
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius"
> <mballetta@h...> wrote:
> > Ciao Piasano e' Salve
> > E' possibile che sara aperto in Ottobre?
> > Ci veddiamo, vale
> >
> > Trans - Is it possible that it will be open in October?
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Franciscus Apulus Caesar"
> > <sacro_barese_impero@l...> wrote:
> > > Salvete Omnes,
> > >
> > > I'm writing to inform you all about the last news.
> > > Illustrus Legatus Marcus Iulius Perusianus is conitnuing his
> > > wonderful job in the Project of Restoration of the Temple of
> Magna
> > > Mater.
> > > After the meetings with the Soprintendenza Archeologica of Rome
> and
> > > the Prof. Pensabene of University La Sapienza of Rome, Director
> of
> > > the Palatine's ruins, in the last monday Perusianus have
visited
> > the
> > > hill with an assistant of Pensabene.
> > > The ruins are closed to the public and tourists, but thanks to
> this
> > > assistant, Perusianus entried in the ruins doing several
outdoor
> > > photos.
> > >
> > > The news are that maybe these photos will be exposed in a
little
> > > gallery during teh International Nova Roma Rally in Bologna
from
> > 1st
> > > to 3th August.
> > >
> > > Again we could organize a visit to a little group of Nova
Romans
> to
> > > the Temple. The tour will be authorized by the Soprintendenza
> and
> > > driven by Pensabene. Maybe this tour could be in October during
> a
> > > meeting of Proivincia Italia.
> > >
> > > As soon as possible other informations.
> > >
> > > Valete
> > > FAC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12500 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Advertising in the Eagle & a suggestion !
LOL, very true.
Sometimes there is too much emphasis on the seat position.
If it is up - put it down, if down, put it up, if where you want it -
leave well enough alone.
Thanks for the reply and the amusing annology.
I always appreciate a little levity to lighten the load.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Lucius Cornelius Sardonicus
<l_c_sardonicus@y...> wrote:
> Salve Marci Ambrosi Belisari,
>
>
> Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius <mballetta@h...> wrote:
> "Both parties are sincere in belief of their positions. It would
be a great asset to have it in black and white when deciding on which
faction to support and as evidence to substantiate claims as well as
denounce others. Sounds like a noble task for a dilligent scribe."
>
> LCS: Nothing is as black and white as it seems. These people are
not divided into two distinct camps at war with each other.
>
> It is a daunting task to search through the archives in order
subtantiate or denounce a claim regarding a previous post unless it
is cited or hyperlinked. I've been singularly unsuccessful in my
searches of the archives especially where the claim is of something
that happened a while ago. In the end, does it really matter if
Debatus called Bickerus a motherless coward over a debate on the
merits of leaving the toilet seat up or down?
>
> Instead of focusing on supporting a faction, I suggest you focus on
the worthiness of the individual, petition or proposal at hand.
Which way do YOU want the toilet seat?
>
> Vale,
> LCS
> (who is not a mindless follower of anything)
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12501 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: [[Nova-Roma] Re: groups to add to poll]
Salve Kyrene,
You might enjoy the thread in the religio section which is discussing
this precise topic of the word Pagan - others share your viewpoint.
Vale
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Kyrene Ariadne
<kyrene_ariadne@t...> wrote:
>
>
> "wuffa2001" <holyconelia@h...> wrote:
> > then 3 polls one for the churchs one for the wiccan and one for
the
> > other pagans ?
>
> Salve!
>
> Yeah, narrowing down the "Pagans" would help considerably--
especially for
> those like myself who don't use the term Pagan, given its extreme
confusion
> with all forms of Wicca. I prefer "Greek polytheist" myself.
>
>
> Vale,
> Andrea Gladia Cyrene
>
>
>
>
>
> * Kyrene Ariadne / Andrea Gladia Cyrene *
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> * Hellenion: http://www.hellenion.org *
> * Ai Mystai Greek Mysteries: http://ai-mystai.faithweb.com *
> * Temple of Apollon: http://www.TempleApollo.com *
> * Temple of Dionysos: http://www.TempleDionysos.com *
> * Temple of Aphrodite: http://www.TempleAphrodite.net *
> * ICQ:6663573 Yahoo:KyreneAriadne AIM:Kyrene Ariadne *
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
> This message was sent from my Palm wireless email account.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12502 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Salve,
Snip
> I Have heard claims from fundimentalists that the "X"
> in Xmas is some modern plot to "ex" Christ out of
> Christmas.
>

Of course they would but who can remember when christ "was in"
christmas. He was written out long ago and Santa Clause and Rudolph
replaced him in the commerciality of it all. It is a holiday to
celebrate the giving of gifts now.
Not to remember the Solstice, the longest night of the year or the
birth of the Sun God. It's ahallmark holiday.


> Sulla: Intersting...my parents uses Xmas as an abbreviation
too....and they were Christians...my mom converted from Judiasm to
Christianity before I was born.
>
> "X" or "XP" were been used as abbrevations for Christ
> at least since the time of Constitine, and likely
> longer than that.
>
> Sulla: Exactly...so, I would like to know where Caius Minucius
came up with his "opinion."
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12503 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Augustus: Conservative, Liberal, or Moderate?
In a message dated 7/2/03 7:45:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
politicog@... writes:


> My feeling is that he did what he felt was necessary
> to ensure the future success of Rome, and in that
> sense he could be considered a Machiavellian centuries
> before Machiavelli wrote "The Prince."
> I would appreciate any comments that others might
> have about this.
>
Q. Fabius Maximus SPD

Salvete


Most of what Nicci wrote was dragged from the Roman classics and just given
his 15th cent spin. The man himself was a Classicist His "Istorie" was just
that, not a true study of history in a classic sense but "our history" his own
history interpreted by him. So it is not surprising that both Alkibides, and
Augustus are two of his mentioned heroes.

When I worked on that wrenched TVM "Cleopatra" one of the Italian producers
keep telling that Augustus was the first CEO of a corporation. He saw Egypt as
competition to be merged with.
It is so tempting to assign modern values to ancient regimes, because then it
then all so easy to understand them. I'll never forgot my first university
classics Prof. giving out a vivid green handout saying "American European"
Under the American heading was Roman, and how Americans were like Romans.
Then under Europian was Greek, and how Europians were more like Hellenics.
Needless to say I didn't lean much in that class.

People are people. We are all driven by the same needs and desires. That's
why I find
NR so interesting and why I am a classical reconstructionist. Trying to get
the bridge
between both cultures is both a challenge and a delight.

Valete


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12504 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: groups to add to religion poll
Salvete,

Honestly, I don't like this poll, even though I realize that it was made
with good intentions.

Once again, we are drawing lines on the floor and dividing ourselves into
little categories. Even with the long list of religions, we are slicing and
dicing it into even smaller pieces, just to make perfectly sure that we can
tick that perfect little box which fits us.

Aside, this poll won't be accurate since many citizens are subscribed only
to the Religio list and not to this one at all.

Valete,
Diana Moravia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12505 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Augustus: Conservative, Liberal, or Moderate?
.............and vice versa.
Many of todays business members are learning tactics from military
strategy.
As you mentioned The Prince.
So true that many were practicing these methods before Macchiavelli
put them into writing - he had great role models to go by.
As did Musashi for the Go Rin No Sho - book of 5 rings and Sun Tzu in
the Art of War.
All excellent books for strategy not only in war but in Life and
business.

When I first read Nicci in your post I thought at first you meant
Nietzche, MY BAD, lol and that is another topic for another time, lol.
Salve

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, qfabiusmaxmi@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 7/2/03 7:45:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> politicog@y... writes:
>
>
> > My feeling is that he did what he felt was necessary
> > to ensure the future success of Rome, and in that
> > sense he could be considered a Machiavellian centuries
> > before Machiavelli wrote "The Prince."
> > I would appreciate any comments that others might
> > have about this.
> >
> Q. Fabius Maximus SPD
>
> Salvete
>
>
> Most of what Nicci wrote was dragged from the Roman classics and
just given
> his 15th cent spin. The man himself was a Classicist His "Istorie"
was just
> that, not a true study of history in a classic sense but "our
history" his own
> history interpreted by him. So it is not surprising that both
Alkibides, and
> Augustus are two of his mentioned heroes.
>
> When I worked on that wrenched TVM "Cleopatra" one of the Italian
producers
> keep telling that Augustus was the first CEO of a corporation. He
saw Egypt as
> competition to be merged with.
> It is so tempting to assign modern values to ancient regimes,
because then it
> then all so easy to understand them. I'll never forgot my first
university
> classics Prof. giving out a vivid green handout
saying "American European"
> Under the American heading was Roman, and how Americans were like
Romans.
> Then under Europian was Greek, and how Europians were more like
Hellenics.
> Needless to say I didn't lean much in that class.
>
> People are people. We are all driven by the same needs and
desires. That's
> why I find
> NR so interesting and why I am a classical reconstructionist.
Trying to get
> the bridge
> between both cultures is both a challenge and a delight.
>
> Valete
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12506 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
"L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@...> writes:

> Interesting, I have gone to California Baptist College/University (til
> about 6 years ago, and have been taught by preachers in various biblical
> classes), and have gone to Church til I was about 15 years old..and have
> been exposed to Christians every day and have never heard any reservation
> about it. And, have seen members of Church authority utilize the
> abbreviation. So, I guess its a draw.

As with so many things, individual experience varies. It's not
the sort of thing I generally think people are using to be offensive,
and I don't know that anyone has suggested that was the case.

> Personally, I am against all of this PC stuff....

I have little use for Political Correctness in the sense that the
term was invented to refer to in the old Soviet Union. I'll note
that I often see "PC" used to label the kind of conduct that I
think of as common courtesy, and I am all in favor of common
courtesy.

> its not really appropriate...and if there is no negativity
> in the post that was originally made then the abbreviation
> should not be an issue...

In that we agree.

> unless if you and your Cohort

Me and my Cohort? Would that be my Quaestor and my three scribes?

The Senior Consul has a cohort. I'm part of it, but I wouldn't
presume to call it mine.

> decide to try to promulgate a law against the use of abbreviations
> in the Nova Roma Main List.

I assure you that I don't intend any such thing Lucius Cornelius.
If someone were to suggest such a thing, I'd speak against it.

-- Gn. Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12507 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Augustus: Conservative, Liberal, or Moderate?
Salvete omnes,

I would have to say that at his peak in age and power Augustus was
more conservative. He was concerned about the morals of the Romans
and tried to heavily promote the family and family values. Don't
forget he exiled his own daughter for sexual misbehavior and banished
the poet Ovid for is raunchy verses. On the social end of things he
would be considered conservative.

He was by no means the military calibre of Caesar, Anthony or others
but he was a shrewed politician and out foxed many strong opponents.
There were also the many reforms and ideas credited to him and I do
believe he was concerned for Rome's welfare and did not live in high
luxury. Therefore on the political end he was more liberal. Though
seemingly ruthless in his climb to power, he sure appeared to mellow
once he had settled in and matured. I think he was one of the
greatest Romans and whenever I think of Rome, I think of his busts
and statues first.


Regards,

Quintus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12508 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: groups to add to religion poll
---

Salvete Diana et al.

Well, these 'divisions' it would seem to me are formed at the most
idiosynchratic times, whenever it seems convenient, infortunately. So
I don't think the formality of a poll does any worse damage, likely
less, because their is less personal ambition attached to a poll.
However, I'm inclined to regard the whole pole as unnecessary unless
I know the purpose for it other than 'to serve you better'

And, if we wish to add to the long list of religious affiliations, we
must not forget the Moravian Church....ahh, yes, the Moravian
Church....ahh, Christians I do believe.



Pompeia

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Diana Moravia Aventina" <diana@p...>
wrote:
> Salvete,
>
> Honestly, I don't like this poll, even though I realize that it was
made
> with good intentions.
>
> Once again, we are drawing lines on the floor and dividing
ourselves into
> little categories. Even with the long list of religions, we are
slicing and
> dicing it into even smaller pieces, just to make perfectly sure
that we can
> tick that perfect little box which fits us.
>
> Aside, this poll won't be accurate since many citizens are
subscribed only
> to the Religio list and not to this one at all.
>
> Valete,
> Diana Moravia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12509 From: Sp. Postumius Tubertus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Census
Salve Laureate Amorice,

> I was pleased to see earlier today that the long awaited census is now on
> the way. After having quickly replied I would like to encourage all my
> fellow citizens to stand up and be counted ! At long last we will know soon
> how many of us are still up for a drink ;-)

Census underway? Did I miss something?

Vale,

Sp. Postumius Tubertus

"Nam nemo sine vitiis nascitur; optimus ille est qui minima habet." -- Q. Horatius Flaccus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12510 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Faction v. Fiction
Salvete Quirites; et salve, Luci Corneli Sardonice.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Lucius Cornelius Sardonicus
<l_c_sardonicus@y...> wrote:

<<snipped>>

> We are not Romans living in the Republic. We are a modern micro-
> nation. Therefore, anything we do must be a compromise between
> historical accuracy and actions that best serve our citizens. If
> the historically accurate thing is also the thing that best serves
> our citizens then we are better off for both. I believe that we
> can also agree that historical correctness is not always the thing
> that best serves Nova Roma. What then, to do?
>
>
>
> Our constitution has the following mandates, "We hereby declare our
> Nation to stand as a beacon for those who would recreate the best
> of ancient Rome" and "The primary functions of Nova Roma shall be
> to promote the study and practice of pagan Roman civilizationÂ…
> encompassing such fields as religion, culture, politics, art,
> literature, language, and philosophy." My interpretation of this
> is that if there is historical precedent in answer to an issue, we
> should follow the precedent as closely as possible within our means
> providing that the solution isn't morally abhorrent. However, if
> there is no historical precedent or no verifiable record of one,
> conjecture regarding what the Romans might have done holds no
> value. In those cases, we have leeway in how we structure
> ourselves and conduct our business. In those cases, we can happily
> do what is best for our citizens without being remiss in fulfilling
> the constitutional mandate. Do these statements make me a
> traditionalist or a modernist? Neither, I believe. They make me
> a Nova Roman with our Micro-nation's best interests at heart.

<<snipped>>

I must thank you, Luci Corneli, for bringing back these ideas to the
discussion. I can certainly subscribe your thoughts above, and I have
the impression that an overwhelming majority of our citizens will
subscribe them as well.

Of course, we can still argue about finer details; but I generally
think that this statement is in the mind and heart of every
Novoroman.

Let's work together to make our Republic stronger, wider and more
Roman. All the rest (political bickering included) is mainly a waste
of time.

CN·SALIX·ASTVR·T·F·A·NEP·TRIB·OVF
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12511 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: New poll for Nova-Roma
Can we pick more than one.

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:15 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] New poll for Nova-Roma



Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
Nova-Roma group:

In order to help build Nova Roma in
the Macro world , the physical Nova
Roma, we need to know what talents,
the Citizens of Nova Roma can bring to
this task. Please check those
occupations that apply to you. You
may also check one if you have an
AVOCATION that can be used to further
this goal of a physical Nova Roma.
Vale


o Occupation in architecture, engineering, and surveying
o Occupation in mathematics and physical sciences
o Occupation in life science
o Occupation in medicine and health
o Occupation in education/teaching
o Occupation in museum, library, and archival sciences
o Occupation in law and jurisprudence
o Occupation in religion and theology
o Occupation in writing/publishing
o Occupation in administrative specializations
o Other professional, technical, and managerial occupations
o Computing and account-recording occupations
o Sales occupation, all types of sales
o Amusement, recreation, motion picture, radio and television occupations
o Lodging and related service occupation
o Protective service occupation
o Plant farming / Animal farming occupation
o Construction occupation/ Transportation occupation
o Fishery /Forestry occupation /trapping, / Hunting and related occupation
o Occupation in extraction of minerals
o Occupation in production and distribution of utilities (e.g., energy, water, sewage)
o Occupation in processing of metal
o Occupation in processing of paper and related material
o Occupation in processing of petroleum, coal, natural and manufactured gas, and related products
o other/ DK/ Decline


To vote, please visit the following web page:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/surveys?id=11140313

Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.

Thanks!







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12512 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: New poll for Nova-Roma(Avocation)
You should check out the Back Alley for other decent Polls.

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Charlie Collins
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] New poll for Nova-Roma(Avocation)


Finally, a decent poll!

Sextus Cornelius Cotta

Propraetor
America Medioccidentalis Superior Province
Nova Roma


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12513 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: New poll for Nova-Roma(Avocation)
AVETE OMNES

Sorry, I can't see neither "atheist" nor "agnostic", while I think
that some citizen could wish them to be included in the poll. Or
should they fall under the "other" cathegory?

BENE VALETE
M'Con.Serapio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12514 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Word Origins / Latin
Three Viking longships pull up on shore.
Men of the first run up the beach waving their swords "By Odin 'tis our turn to pillage the monasteries and ransack the manors!"
Men of the second run up the beach waving axes over their head "By Thor, 'tis our turn to slay the men and slaughter all the cattle for a great feast!".
Men of the third stagger up the beach trying to keep each other upright "By Frigg, it can't be our turn *yet again* to ravish all those women!"

Caesariensis,

-----Original Message-----
From : “Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)“ <mjk@...>
To : Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date : 02 July 2003 18:33:06
Subject : [Nova-Roma] Re: Word Origins / Latin
Salve my friend Marce!
>
>


--
Personalised email by http://another.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12515 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: New poll for Nova-Roma (Religion, not Avocation)
AVETE OMNES

Sorry, of course i referred to the poll on religion...

VALETE
M'Con.Serapio


AVETE OMNES

> Sorry, I can't see neither "atheist" nor "agnostic", while I think
> that some citizen could wish them to be included in the poll. Or
> should they fall under the "other" cathegory?
>
> BENE VALETE
> M'Con.Serapio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12516 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: A new revised and more historical "Lex Fabia de Ratione Comitiorum
Salvete Quirites!

Two weeks ago I published a proposal for a lex governing the Comitia
Centuriata and especially the elections therein, the "Lex Fabia de
Ratione Comitiorum Centuriatorum". My aim was to get some points of
view to maybe improve my proposal. I had honestly tried to include
such historical ideas that I had recieved, but during the public
discussion Honorable Gaius Iulius Scaurus came forward with more
ideas for inclusion in such a law. As I am an amateur historian (BA,
with a major in History) with a distinct interest in the traditions
of Roma Antiqua I found his ideas very interesting and decided to
contact him.

This resulted in the fact that both of us and some of my assistants
partly or totally disappeared from the main list to do some
constructive work. Now we have arrived at the point were I will soon
be prepared to publish our joint work as a new proposal for a "Lex
Fabia de Ratione Comitiorum Centuriatorum". We have only to add a
part, recommended by Gaius Iulius Scaurus, about the voting in the
case of a trial.

I am more of a doer and listener. There has been raised an idea about
mock elections and my Accensus Illustrus Gnaeus Equitius Marinus has
offered himself to organise such, as those who have asked for them
haven't shown any interest. These mock elections will soon be opened
by Illustrus Gnaeus Equitius Marinus in his capacity as Curule Aedile.

I plan to put forward this law to the Comitia during July if no
problems show during the mock elections. This will mean that there
will be some shortage of time as the vote must be adjusted to the
requirements of the Roman calender and as I will be going to the Nova
Roman Rally at the 31st of July.

I thank the citizens who have taken the time to write to me on this
matter for their advice and help. I look forward to the opportunity
to present a Lex incorporating so many good ideas.
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Consul et Senator
Propraetor Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Consulis CFQ
http://www.insulaumbra.com/cohors_consulis_cfq/
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12517 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Census
> > I was pleased to see earlier today that the long awaited census is now on
> > the way. After having quickly replied I would like to encourage all my
> > fellow citizens to stand up and be counted ! At long last we will know soon
> > how many of us are still up for a drink ;-)
>
> Census underway? Did I miss something?

If you paid your tax, voted in an election, registered your gens, or
became a citizen this year, you're counted already. 603 citizens
were counted this way.

The rest received mail this morning. Fifty have followed the link
thus far, a handful more have responded by email wishing to be citizens,
one resigned.

This weekend I'll be processing the list of bouncing email addresses
and building tools for Censores and Propraetores to update and
view citizen information.

Vale, O.

--
Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
http://www.graveyards.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12518 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 05:40:26AM -0400, qfabiusmaxmi@... wrote:
> In a message dated 7/2/03 12:45:30 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> laureatusarmoricus@... writes:
>
>
> > What is IIRC ?
>
> If I recall

"If I recall correctly" is the usual meaning; there would not be any
need for a 'C'.

> AIRC
> As I recall
> IMO
> In my opinion
> SS
> Sources say
> These are all used in scholarly discussion e-mails
>
> Of course I have to Scaveola to task about the X in Christian.

That, I think you'd find beyond your ability. You're welcome to state
your opinion, of course.

> The Catholic
> Church uses
> it as an abbrevation in e-mail, which I doubt they would if it was
> derogatory.

The question was not whether it's derogatory in your opinion or that of
the Catholic Church (since I have not corresponded with them, I cannot
say whether your opinion is accurate, correct, false, policy, or other);
my statement was that it is often considered an offensive usage. Go to
<http://groups.google.com/> and search for the terms; you should find it
instructive.


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Duo cum faciunt idem, non est idem.
When two do the same thing, it isn't the same (i.e. one can get away with doing
something while another cannot).
-- Terence, "Adelphoe". Cf. "quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12519 From: Sp. Postumius Tubertus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Census
Salve Censor Octavi,

> If you paid your tax, voted in an election, registered your gens, or
> became a citizen this year, you're counted already. 603 citizens
> were counted this way.

I did at least one of the above, so that throws me in with 602 others. Not a bad lot, I might add.

> The rest received mail this morning. Fifty have followed the link
> thus far, a handful more have responded by email wishing to be citizens,
> one resigned.

Though it's not good to hear of anyone resigning, at least we know such a citizen either lacks interest or time in Nova Roma. Better that than staying on the rolls, but never doing anything.

> This weekend I'll be processing the list of bouncing email addresses
> and building tools for Censores and Propraetores to update and
> view citizen information.

Sounds good. Nice to see things moving so quickly. I suppose this means we have a census which can actually work! That's always a plus!

Vale,

Sp. Postumius Tubertus,
Taxpayer
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12520 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Salvete omnes,

I found a good website for our newbies and no doubt some older Nova
Romans that organizes everything in a nutshell so you'll catch on to
the system quicker. I suggest you book mark the site and also print
off a copy to keep by your computer as political issues are discussed
on the ML. Hopefully everthing will fall into place.

http://www.vroma.org/~bmcmanus/romangvt.html


Now my question to the administration is this: In the macro world we
are allowed to go into our legistatures during certain times and
observe the proccedings and debates. Is there any way the citizens
here can drop in on the various websites on a strictly moderated
status where our government does its business; for example - how does
the censor department work, what knowledge is needed to keep the
records, how are the senate debates conducted (on various chat
systems?) how do our Quaestors organize our financing; what are the
mechanisms etc, how does our election department and the rogotars
organize and conduct their business. I realize there are limitations
because of personal privacy etc but is there any way tours could be
arranged? If not how does one learn? If someone wishes to run for
censor in 2 years, how is he groomed for the job for example?

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12521 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: New poll for Nova-Roma
Salve YES
----- Original Message -----
From: L. Cornelius Sulla
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] New poll for Nova-Roma


Can we pick more than one.

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:15 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] New poll for Nova-Roma



Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
Nova-Roma group:

In order to help build Nova Roma in
the Macro world , the physical Nova
Roma, we need to know what talents,
the Citizens of Nova Roma can bring to
this task. Please check those
occupations that apply to you. You
may also check one if you have an
AVOCATION that can be used to further
this goal of a physical Nova Roma.
Vale


o Occupation in architecture, engineering, and surveying
o Occupation in mathematics and physical sciences
o Occupation in life science
o Occupation in medicine and health
o Occupation in education/teaching
o Occupation in museum, library, and archival sciences
o Occupation in law and jurisprudence
o Occupation in religion and theology
o Occupation in writing/publishing
o Occupation in administrative specializations
o Other professional, technical, and managerial occupations
o Computing and account-recording occupations
o Sales occupation, all types of sales
o Amusement, recreation, motion picture, radio and television occupations
o Lodging and related service occupation
o Protective service occupation
o Plant farming / Animal farming occupation
o Construction occupation/ Transportation occupation
o Fishery /Forestry occupation /trapping, / Hunting and related occupation
o Occupation in extraction of minerals
o Occupation in production and distribution of utilities (e.g., energy, water, sewage)
o Occupation in processing of metal
o Occupation in processing of paper and related material
o Occupation in processing of petroleum, coal, natural and manufactured gas, and related products
o other/ DK/ Decline


To vote, please visit the following web page:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/surveys?id=11140313

Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.

Thanks!







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12522 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Christian and Xtian (was Re: The Back Alley)
Salve,

On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:16:22AM -0700, politicog wrote:
>
> Some Christians preceive other people's
> use of X in place of Christ as in effect erasing
> Christ from both Christmas and Christian, which some
> Christians take to be offensive.

AIUI, that was exactly what some people found offensive about the usage.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Sed fugit interae, fugit irreparabile tempus.
But meanwhile, the irreplaceable time escapes.
-- Vergil, "Georgica". Usually, you only quote the last three words.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12523 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
--- Caius Minucius Scaevola <ben@...> wrote:

>
> The question was not whether it's derogatory in your
> opinion or that of
> the Catholic Church (since I have not corresponded
> with them, I cannot
> say whether your opinion is accurate, correct,
> false, policy, or other);
> my statement was that it is often considered an
> offensive usage. Go to
> <http://groups.google.com/> and search for the
> terms; you should find it
> instructive.
>
It would be more accurate to say that people with
offensive ideas sometimes use the phrase xtian. So?
I doubt thare are many words or phrases in the English
language that some bigot or another hasn't used in an
offensive statement.

Chi(X) or Chi Rho "XP" have been abbrevations for
Christ for at least 17 centuries, were most likely
coined by Christians, and have been used by them for
that entire period.

It is also a phrase that has been used in Nova Roma
for years. Why the sudden objection? Is it due to the
phrase or due to the person who used it?


=====
L. Sicinius Drusus

Roman Citizen

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12524 From: Sp. Postumius Tubertus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Salve Quinte Amice et Magistratus Capitolini,

<cut>

> Now my question to the administration is this: In the macro world we
> are allowed to go into our legistatures during certain times and
> observe the proccedings and debates. Is there any way the citizens
> here can drop in on the various websites on a strictly moderated
> status where our government does its business; for example - how does
> the censor department work, what knowledge is needed to keep the
> records, how are the senate debates conducted (on various chat
> systems?) how do our Quaestors organize our financing; what are the
> mechanisms etc, how does our election department and the rogotars
> organize and conduct their business. I realize there are limitations
> because of personal privacy etc but is there any way tours could be
> arranged? If not how does one learn? If someone wishes to run for
> censor in 2 years, how is he groomed for the job for example?

As regards the Senate issue, I believe this debate happened sometime at the end of last year or the beginning of this year. In any case, the Senate doors are not open to the public. It happens to be the duty of the Tribuni Plebis to report to the people what goes on in the Senate. That said....

I myself would like to know how the Censores conduct their business, how they keep records, and the like, as well as how the Rogatores get the votes for each election, et cetera. I can say that I hope to attain the office of Censor someday (and by that point, it would most likely have changed greatly from what it is now), but before I run for any office, I too would like to know how the offices operate.

Valete,

Sp. Postumius Tubertus
Tax Paying Citizen of New Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12525 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Avete Omnes,

There was a Censor handbook located at www.earthlink.net/~alexious. Created by myself and Oppius Flaccus Severus (ex-citizen) and my colleague at the time Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus. It had a very good breakdown of the office of Censor including various scenarios that we (ex-Censors) have encountered in the past.

Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
----- Original Message -----
From: Sp. Postumius Tubertus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS


Salve Quinte Amice et Magistratus Capitolini,

<cut>

> Now my question to the administration is this: In the macro world we
> are allowed to go into our legistatures during certain times and
> observe the proccedings and debates. Is there any way the citizens
> here can drop in on the various websites on a strictly moderated
> status where our government does its business; for example - how does
> the censor department work, what knowledge is needed to keep the
> records, how are the senate debates conducted (on various chat
> systems?) how do our Quaestors organize our financing; what are the
> mechanisms etc, how does our election department and the rogotars
> organize and conduct their business. I realize there are limitations
> because of personal privacy etc but is there any way tours could be
> arranged? If not how does one learn? If someone wishes to run for
> censor in 2 years, how is he groomed for the job for example?

As regards the Senate issue, I believe this debate happened sometime at the end of last year or the beginning of this year. In any case, the Senate doors are not open to the public. It happens to be the duty of the Tribuni Plebis to report to the people what goes on in the Senate. That said....

I myself would like to know how the Censores conduct their business, how they keep records, and the like, as well as how the Rogatores get the votes for each election, et cetera. I can say that I hope to attain the office of Censor someday (and by that point, it would most likely have changed greatly from what it is now), but before I run for any office, I too would like to know how the offices operate.

Valete,

Sp. Postumius Tubertus
Tax Paying Citizen of New Rome

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12526 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Salve Quinte Lani,

> Is there any way the citizens
> here can drop in on the various websites on a strictly moderated
> status where our government does its business;

Good idea.

Here's two hastily-captured screenshots of the Censors' tools:

http://www.novaroma.org/lookinside/editor.jpg
http://www.novaroma.org/lookinside/magistrate.jpg

--
Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
http://www.graveyards.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12527 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Ave, L. Cornelius Sulla -

On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:59:59AM -0700, L. Cornelius Sulla wrote:
Ben Okopnik wrote:

> > Salve -
> >
> > I maintain a fairly large list of Internet acronyms at my web site -
> >
> > <http://okopnik.freeshell.org/acronyms.html>
> >
> > (One of these days, I'll turn it into a CGI search engine... but people
> > seem to like browsing it as is.)
> >
> > If you append a '#' sign and the acronym/initialism you're looking for,
> > you'll be taken right to the definition - for example:
> >
> > http://okopnik.freeshell.org/acronyms.html#YABSA
> >
> > Also, IME, "Xtian" is often considered an offensive usage.
> >
> > Sulla: Really....where did you come up with that opinion?

From my rather broad and long experience on Usenet. Over the years, I've
seen many flamewars erupt over it, which the usage of "Christian" would
have avoided. Ergo, in my opinion it seems sensible to spell it out - I
try to avoid insulting or offending people unintentionally.

> I would
> like to know...considering I learned using Xtian during my
> childhood, from my former preacher (non-denominatial)...who used it
> quite extensively as an abbreviation when writing on the chalkboard
> during Sunday Services. Considering that Christian followers
> usually used the X and P as letters in Jesus's name.

For me, it's a textbook example of the Golden Rule. If I was using the
abbreviated version and found that it bothered even a single person in a
casual conversation, I'd change it: the cost to me is nil, and it makes
things more pleasant for someone else. In fact, I did exactly that a
while ago when I found out that "Oriental" was deprecated by many people
in favor of "Asian".


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Iniuria non excusat iniuriam.
One wrong does not justify another.
-- N/A
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12528 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Salve Amice!

You are already on part of that road as my Accensus and Scriba to the
Curator Araneum. To become an Accensus or Scribe is the best way to
get to know how the job is done. If some one is interested you should
contact the Magistrate in question and tell him/her that You are
willing to work. ;-) This way You may become an Accensus, Legatus or
Scriba. Still it is good to not take on too many positions. ;-)

>I myself would like to know how the Censores conduct their business,
>how they keep records, and the like, as well as how the Rogatores
>get the votes for each election, et cetera. I can say that I hope to
>attain the office of Censor someday (and by that point, it would
>most likely have changed greatly from what it is now), but before I
>run for any office, I too would like to know how the offices operate.
>
>Valete,
>
>Sp. Postumius Tubertus
>Tax Paying Citizen of New Rome

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Consul et Senator
Propraetor Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Consulis CFQ
http://www.insulaumbra.com/cohors_consulis_cfq/
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12529 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Salvete,
I would like to point out that a citizen wishing to
learn how most of our offices work can offer to serve
as a Scriba and learn by actually working with the
staff instead of just observing them.

--- Marcus Octavius Germanicus <hucke@...>
wrote:
> Salve Quinte Lani,
>
> > Is there any way the citizens
> > here can drop in on the various websites on a
> strictly moderated
> > status where our government does its business;
>
> Good idea.
>
> Here's two hastily-captured screenshots of the
> Censors' tools:
>
> http://www.novaroma.org/lookinside/editor.jpg
> http://www.novaroma.org/lookinside/magistrate.jpg
>
> --
> Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
> http://www.graveyards.com/
>
>


=====
L. Sicinius Drusus

Roman Citizen

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12530 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Salve gentlemen,

I think a few postings on this matter may have been be overlooked.
Anyway what Drusus says is correct. I grew up in the RC church;
priests in those days had to study Latin and have some exposure to
Greek and knew PX meant Chi Roh. You cannot and could not become a
priest without a university degree so they all knew about these
different issues and yes, the Roman and Greek world.
We used xmas all the time on greetings and stationary as did the
calenders to save space. I never heard 1 complaint from the RC church
at all. Unfortunately many Christians, though well read on the bible
do not know diddley squat about the socio-economic-political history
of Rome and the ancient world. Such statements of condemnation just
display a lack of understanding and these sensitivities and problems
are only going to get worse as history has been dropped as a
compulsory subject from many institutions.

Regards

Quintus Lanius Paulinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Sicinius Drusus"
<lsicinius@y...> wrote:
>
> --- Caius Minucius Scaevola <ben@c...> wrote:
>
> >
> > The question was not whether it's derogatory in your
> > opinion or that of
> > the Catholic Church (since I have not corresponded
> > with them, I cannot
> > say whether your opinion is accurate, correct,
> > false, policy, or other);
> > my statement was that it is often considered an
> > offensive usage. Go to
> > <http://groups.google.com/> and search for the
> > terms; you should find it
> > instructive.
> >
> It would be more accurate to say that people with
> offensive ideas sometimes use the phrase xtian. So?
> I doubt thare are many words or phrases in the English
> language that some bigot or another hasn't used in an
> offensive statement.
>
> Chi(X) or Chi Rho "XP" have been abbrevations for
> Christ for at least 17 centuries, were most likely
> coined by Christians, and have been used by them for
> that entire period.
>
> It is also a phrase that has been used in Nova Roma
> for years. Why the sudden objection? Is it due to the
> phrase or due to the person who used it?
>
>
> =====
> L. Sicinius Drusus
>
> Roman Citizen
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12531 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: "Xtian" (WAS: Tha Back Alley)
Salve,
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 09:35:05AM -0700, L. Cornelius Sulla wrote:
> Ave,
>
> But your not a Christian. So, your post is irrelevant, then, since your not a Christian.

Erm... what, exactly, does that make _your_ "question", since you're not
a Christian either?


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Quod licet Jovi, non licet bovi.
What Jupiter may do, the ox may not.
(I.e., what is permitted for a high-ranking person isn't permitted for everybody.
Cf. aliis si licet, tibi non licet..)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12532 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Ave,

Interesting, I guess I do not hang around usenet enough, I get pretty disgusted by the ego waiving going on at soc.history.medieval to the point that they have developed a FAQ about a particular individual there named D. Spencer Hines, and its funny now that I think about it...but your posts resemble his...upon observation.

Vale,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix

----- Original Message -----
From: Caius Minucius Scaevola
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Tha Back Alley


Ave, L. Cornelius Sulla -

On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:59:59AM -0700, L. Cornelius Sulla wrote:
Ben Okopnik wrote:

> > Salve -
> >
> > I maintain a fairly large list of Internet acronyms at my web site -
> >
> > <http://okopnik.freeshell.org/acronyms.html>
> >
> > (One of these days, I'll turn it into a CGI search engine... but people
> > seem to like browsing it as is.)
> >
> > If you append a '#' sign and the acronym/initialism you're looking for,
> > you'll be taken right to the definition - for example:
> >
> > http://okopnik.freeshell.org/acronyms.html#YABSA
> >
> > Also, IME, "Xtian" is often considered an offensive usage.
> >
> > Sulla: Really....where did you come up with that opinion?

From my rather broad and long experience on Usenet. Over the years, I've
seen many flamewars erupt over it, which the usage of "Christian" would
have avoided. Ergo, in my opinion it seems sensible to spell it out - I
try to avoid insulting or offending people unintentionally.

> I would
> like to know...considering I learned using Xtian during my
> childhood, from my former preacher (non-denominatial)...who used it
> quite extensively as an abbreviation when writing on the chalkboard
> during Sunday Services. Considering that Christian followers
> usually used the X and P as letters in Jesus's name.

For me, it's a textbook example of the Golden Rule. If I was using the
abbreviated version and found that it bothered even a single person in a
casual conversation, I'd change it: the cost to me is nil, and it makes
things more pleasant for someone else. In fact, I did exactly that a
while ago when I found out that "Oriental" was deprecated by many people
in favor of "Asian".


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Iniuria non excusat iniuriam.
One wrong does not justify another.
-- N/A

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12533 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: "Xtian" (WAS: Tha Back Alley)
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 02:13:48PM -0400, qfabiusmaxmi@... wrote:
> In a message dated 7/2/03 10:18:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> cordus@... writes:
>
>
> > I was simply trying to point out in a relatively
> > light-hearted way that it is possible to object to
> > something not because it is offensive but because it
> > is incorrect
>
> My dear Apollonius. I do not believe Lucius Cornelius is annoyed with you.
> I believe he is annoyed with the PC nature of this discussion to which you
^^

Note: "PC" means "politically correct" and not "QFM or LCS don't like
it". You can try to twist the meaning - both of you have - but it only
makes you look silly and adds nothing useful to the discussion. There's
nothing political, whether correct or incorrect, in the use of "Xtian"
vs. "Christian".


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Homo homini lupus.
Man is man's wolf.
-- Plautus, "Asinaria"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12534 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: The Religion Poll
Salve Romans

I have deleted the poll on religion. I apologize if I have upset
anybody.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12535 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Salvete, omnes -

On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:54:35PM -0700, L. Sicinius Drusus wrote:
>
> It would be more accurate to say that people with
> offensive ideas sometimes use the phrase xtian.

That's a pointless and patently false statement. It would be far less
accurate to say that, since - like the above - it conveys no useful
information. As Larry Wall said, "idiots are associated with
_everything._"

The above is also a very slick piece of maneuvering that I find to be
contrary to the spirit of honest discussion, since it attempts to place
the burden of proof on the person being offended instead of where it
belongs - on the offender.

Given your recent behavior on this list, I actually have no interest in
discussing anything at all with you. However, I'm still willing to point
out this kind of underhanded twisting so that others don't get caught by
it.

> It is also a phrase that has been used in Nova Roma
> for years. Why the sudden objection? Is it due to the
> phrase or due to the person who used it?

More foolish and manipulative innuendo. I don't remember who used it
first, although it was probably LCS. Someone here asked a question; I
answered it, and included pertinent information.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Mendacem memorem esse oportet.
A liar needs a good memory.
-- Quintilianus, "De institutione oratoria"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12536 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Nova Roma Census
Salvtee Civis Novae Romae,

NOVA ROMA is conducting its biannual census of citizens from
July 2 to October 22, 2003. If you have voted, paid your
annual fee, registered your gens, or joined within the current
year, then you have already been counted. If you have done none
of these things, then we request that you now participate in the
Census.

Those who do respond (which takes only seconds) will be counted
as full-fledged citizens of Nova Roma. Those who
do not respond to email, paper mail, or telephone call will be
reclassified as a "Socius" (Ally) rather than a citizen, and
will thereafter be unable to vote or be a paterfamliias until
requesting and regaining citizen status.

To register yourself as a citizen, go to:

http://www.novaroma.org/bin/prefs?cmd=census

...and log in with your Roman Name and password. (If you've
forgotten your password you may easily reset it from here).

OR, you may simply reply to this message and state that you are
registering as a citizen (give your Roman name if you remember
it so we can be sure to credit the right person).

To check whether you are already registered, go to the web site's
Album Gentium:

http://www.novaroma.org/bin/view/gentes

...locate your gens; locate your name on your gens page; then
click your name to load your personal profile page. There, you will
see either "Citizen" or "Socius" next to the label "Status"; to
instantly move from Socius to Citizen, go to the census page as
described above.

Thanks and Valete,

C. Flavius Diocletianus et
M. Octavius Germanicus,
Censores.

--
Marcus Octavius Germanicus,
Censor, Consular, Citizen.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12537 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
--- Caius Minucius Scaevola <ben@...> wrote:
> Salvete, omnes -
>
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:54:35PM -0700, L.
> Sicinius Drusus wrote:
> >
> > It would be more accurate to say that people with
> > offensive ideas sometimes use the phrase xtian.
>
> That's a pointless and patently false statement. It
> would be far less
> accurate to say that, since - like the above - it
> conveys no useful
> information. As Larry Wall said, "idiots are
> associated with
> _everything._"
>
> The above is also a very slick piece of maneuvering
> that I find to be
> contrary to the spirit of honest discussion, since
> it attempts to place
> the burden of proof on the person being offended
> instead of where it
> belongs - on the offender.
>

Laying burden of proof on the accuser rather than the
accused is a long standing concept that most consider
fair.

If someone enters this group and claims that the terms
"Christ" and "Christian" are offensive to them because
Christos means the anoited one, making the name a
claim that thier faith is the only true one, will you
launch a crusade to stop the use of the word
"Christian"?

Some people are offended by any usage of the word
"black" as a synonym for evil claiming it's racist.
Have you purged "Black Magic" and "Blackhearted" from
your vocabulary?


=====
L. Sicinius Drusus

Roman Citizen

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12538 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
"L. Sicinius Drusus" wrote:

> Chi(X) or Chi Rho "XP" have been abbrevations for
> Christ for at least 17 centuries, were most likely
> coined by Christians, and have been used by them for
> that entire period.
>
> It is also a phrase that has been used in Nova Roma
> for years. Why the sudden objection? Is it due to the
> phrase or due to the person who used it?

My dear Senator Drusus,

I can assure you that I've seen Scaevola (in his alter ego
as Ben) voice the same objection in at least two USENET
newsgroups in the years I've known him. He's quite
consistent about this.

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12539 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
--- Bill Gawne <gawne@...> wrote:
> "L. Sicinius Drusus" wrote:
>
> > Chi(X) or Chi Rho "XP" have been abbrevations for
> > Christ for at least 17 centuries, were most likely
> > coined by Christians, and have been used by them
> for
> > that entire period.
> >
> > It is also a phrase that has been used in Nova
> Roma
> > for years. Why the sudden objection? Is it due to
> the
> > phrase or due to the person who used it?
>
> My dear Senator Drusus,
>
> I can assure you that I've seen Scaevola (in his
> alter ego
> as Ben) voice the same objection in at least two
> USENET
> newsgroups in the years I've known him. He's quite
> consistent about this.
>
> -- Marinus
>
It's been years since I've been in Usenet, so I wasn't
aware of that. This is still the first time I've seen
a complaint about a term that is widly used in Nova
Roma.


=====
L. Sicinius Drusus

Roman Citizen

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12540 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
"Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" wrote:
>
> Salve gentlemen,
>
> I think a few postings on this matter may have been be overlooked.
> Anyway what Drusus says is correct. I grew up in the RC church;
> priests in those days had to study Latin and have some exposure to
> Greek and knew PX meant Chi Roh. You cannot and could not become a
> priest without a university degree so they all knew about these
> different issues and yes, the Roman and Greek world.

Yes, my experience matches yours. I grew up in the Roman Catholic
church, learned the mass in Vulgate Latin, and saw the papal flag
with the Chi Rho symbol on it all the time.

> We used xmas all the time on greetings and stationary as did the
> calenders to save space. I never heard 1 complaint from the RC church
> at all.

In this my experience differs from yours. I can assure you that
at St. Benedict's parish, in the Archdioces of Detroit, the nuns
would have given a severe tongue-lashing to anyone who dared
use X-mas as an abbreviation. It was not only frowned upon, but
actively spoken against in every year's religion class from 1st
through 8th grade.

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12541 From: Paula Drennan Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: The Religion Poll
Salve,
unfortunate. I was actually rather interested to know if I am the only
Muslim in Nova Roma. ah well.
Vale,
Claudia Fabia Calpurnia
----- Original Message -----
From: "Timothy P. Gallagher" <spqr753@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:44 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] The Religion Poll


> Salve Romans
>
> I have deleted the poll on religion. I apologize if I have upset
> anybody.
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12542 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Salvete Gentlemen,

Thank you for all your responses; I saw Censor Octavius' site and
working as a scribe is a good idea for learning the ropes. I'll write
privately on that to some of you very soon. Please forgive the bold
capitalization of this topic. I just wanted to get the attention of
some of our newbies so they can grab the stick diagram and summary.

Respectfully,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12543 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Salve,

On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 05:16:33PM -0700, L. Cornelius Sulla wrote:
> Ave,
>
> Interesting, I guess I do not hang around usenet enough, I get pretty
> disgusted by the ego waiving going on at soc.history.medieval to the
> point that they have developed a FAQ about a particular individual
> there named D. Spencer Hines, and its funny now that I think about
> it...but your posts resemble his...upon observation.

<Chuckle> I can come up with a number of comparisons to what your posts
resemble, but most of them relate to the byproducts of animal husbandry
and waste disposal (although, according to Marshal McLuhan, even those
would contain a single bit of information - which strengthens the
parallel tremendously.)

I realize that you were attempting to display your extremely modest wit,
but I'll ask you not to bother: I'm simply not interested. What you
think of as your sense of humor is non-existent; you're dull,
unintelligent, unsubtle, and - worst of all in this regard - unfunny.
You're too slow to do interesting repartee, your conversational skills
are miniscule, and you're boring.

In other words - since the above is probably too complex for you to
comprehend - shog off.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Homo homini lupus.
Man is man's wolf.
-- Plautus, "Asinaria"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12544 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 06:05:09PM -0700, L. Sicinius Drusus wrote:
>
> --- Caius Minucius Scaevola <ben@...> wrote:
> > Salvete, omnes -
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:54:35PM -0700, L.
> > Sicinius Drusus wrote:
> > >
> > > It would be more accurate to say that people with
> > > offensive ideas sometimes use the phrase xtian.
> >
> > That's a pointless and patently false statement. It
> > would be far less
> > accurate to say that, since - like the above - it
> > conveys no useful
> > information. As Larry Wall said, "idiots are
> > associated with
> > _everything._"
> >
> > The above is also a very slick piece of maneuvering
> > that I find to be
> > contrary to the spirit of honest discussion, since
> > it attempts to place
> > the burden of proof on the person being offended
> > instead of where it
> > belongs - on the offender.
> >
>
> Laying burden of proof on the accuser rather than the
> accused is a long standing concept that most consider
> fair.

The offender *is* the accuser. The person offended is the accused.


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Homo homini lupus.
Man is man's wolf.
-- Plautus, "Asinaria"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12545 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Salvete Quirites,
This post is a prime example of why Caius Minucius
Scaevola is the LAST person in Nova Roma who should be
lecturing people about using offensive terms.

--- Caius Minucius Scaevola <ben@...> wrote:
> Salve,
>
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 05:16:33PM -0700, L.
> Cornelius Sulla wrote:
> > Ave,
> >
> > Interesting, I guess I do not hang around usenet
> enough, I get pretty
> > disgusted by the ego waiving going on at
> soc.history.medieval to the
> > point that they have developed a FAQ about a
> particular individual
> > there named D. Spencer Hines, and its funny now
> that I think about
> > it...but your posts resemble his...upon
> observation.
>
> <Chuckle> I can come up with a number of comparisons
> to what your posts
> resemble, but most of them relate to the byproducts
> of animal husbandry
> and waste disposal (although, according to Marshal
> McLuhan, even those
> would contain a single bit of information - which
> strengthens the
> parallel tremendously.)
>
> I realize that you were attempting to display your
> extremely modest wit,
> but I'll ask you not to bother: I'm simply not
> interested. What you
> think of as your sense of humor is non-existent;
> you're dull,
> unintelligent, unsubtle, and - worst of all in this
> regard - unfunny.
> You're too slow to do interesting repartee, your
> conversational skills
> are miniscule, and you're boring.
>
> In other words - since the above is probably too
> complex for you to
> comprehend - shog off.
>
>
> Vale,
> Caius Minucius Scaevola
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Homo homini lupus.
> Man is man's wolf.
> -- Plautus, "Asinaria"
>


=====
L. Sicinius Drusus

Roman Citizen

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12546 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Resignations - a few thoughts
Salvete omnes,

I was thinking over the last few days of why people resign from NR.
I'm not talking about our political offices but totally leaving the
NR group. To begin with, most of us observed NR on the main list for
a time and got some idea of what is in store for us. That may be the
point to make our yes or no decision. You know, its a little more
sensible to break off a from a troubled relationship before a
marriage rather than after. We all get heated up or down right
frustrated after nasty debates. I confess there were a few times
during the year when I felt like sticking my hand through the
computer srceen and wringing someone's neck, just like on the Bugs
Bunny Cartoons. I spoke up a few times about moving heated nasty
debates to another list but other fellow citizens gave some valid
reasons why we should not do so.

My only question to those who would pull the plug on Nova Roma
because sombody's statements offended them is this: Where are you
going to run to in the world where you shall be free of these
troubles? I tried pointing that out to a lady last year who was
leaving and thought the Academic universities would be the answer and
be able to handle things with dignity. Nonsense I said. Here is what
I have experienced:

1) Universities - A few of my neighbours were profs. They told me the
stories of the infighting, back stabbing and posturing, especially
around tenure and grant times. Publish or perish was their motto.

2) Military - Dad was a senior Naval officer. Mom always told me
about the hypocracy and back biting and shennanigans. Still see that
with my friends who serve.

3) Oil Patch - Yep, my foray; thousands of these stories and the
finger pointing when things go wrong. I am currently treading
carefully as I am in the field working for 2 geologists who are
having some political differences on this project.

4) Health Care - Lots of conflicts there. Got my earfulls when we
used to party with the nurses on weekends.

5) Corporate World - Self explanitory.

6) Churches/religious institutions - Sometimes dwarf all of the above
with their internal politics.

Well the list could go on and on. I think we all have to learn to be
a little thicker skinned. The only time we'll ever get away from this
will certainly be time enough - in the grave.

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12547 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: The Religion Poll
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Paula Drennan" <dragonpink@s...>
wrote:
> Salve,
> unfortunate. I was actually rather interested to know if I am the
only
> Muslim in Nova Roma. ah well.
> Vale,
> Claudia Fabia Calpurnia
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Timothy P. Gallagher" <spqr753@m...>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:44 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] The Religion Poll
>
Salve Claudia,

My friend Tiberius is very honorable and a true Roman with good ideas
who works very hard for us. I can't read his mind but if he got the
slightest inkling that a poll like this could evolve into something
ugly he would not hesitate to pull it.

When we all signed up for NR we knew that the Religio Romano is the
state religion and must be respected and tolerated; especially by
magistrates. The religio in turn, also tolerates our single-god
beliefs and membership in this community. Now suppose the pole at
this date and time showed 95% of us were not practitioners of the
Religio Romano, then I could see the stats being used as a weapon to
alter the status of the religio somewhere down the line in future.
This of course could tear NR to pieces and finish it for good. Also
we must appreciate that this whole institution was founded an
organized mostly by the people who wished to practice and make
Religio Romano as one of the main pillars. For these reasons I think
some things are better left unsaid. I confess, I got talked into
setting up a poll here last year asking people on their thoughts of
the afterlife and deities but a number of people wrote in to request
a cancellation of the poll; I only got 12 replies which I regarded as
a polite way of telling me to piss off.

On a more positive note maybe some other Muslim members may see these
2 postings and contact you in private or on the ML. Please let us
know what transpires.


Regards,

Quintus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12548 From: G¥IVLIVS¥SCAVRVS Date: 2003-07-02
Subject: Re: The Grudge
G. Iulius Scaurus M. Octavio Solari salutem dicit.

Salve, M. Octavi.

> MOS: Oh, I wasn't saying that they belonged to the same declension. I said that <dignitas> and <paterfamilias> was the only correct way of spelling the expression. I wasn't making any grammatical points. Thanks for the explanation anyway, because I have always been a bit unsure what to do with that <-familias>-ending.
>
> So, a borrowed Greek infinitive? Pretty funny for a word that is so typically associated with the Roman way of life! :)

There are actually a large number of Greek borrow words. It is thought
by many philologists that the fossilization of the noun in the Latin-
indeclinable Greek genitive form is a signal that the borrowing took
place at a few early stage of the formation of archaic Latin. As I
indicated in my original answer to A. Apollonius' query about
"paterfamilias," some Latin grammarians regarded "familias" as if it
were an indeclinable enclitic (like -que, for example) and simply
declined "pater," appending "familias." Others advocated separating
"pater" and "familias" into a phrase, decdlining "patres" as needed
and treating "familias" as simply a variant form of "familia," which
was rendered into the dative "familiae" or "familiis," depending on the
number of "pater." Still others treasted "familias" as if it were a
substantive adjective, taking the case and number of "patres." Other
still, particularly in late antiquity, treated "familias" as a variant
of "familia" and rendered it as genitive singular or plural depending
on the number of "pater." The orthography could range from
indeclinable word-element to element of a phrase demanding any of
several cases and numbers; in that regard the spelling procedures
involved with "dignitas" and "paterfamilias" can be very different
indeed.

Vale.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12549 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: New poll for Nova-Roma
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Bill Gawne <gawne@c...> wrote:
> Franciscus Apulus Caesar wrote:
> >
> > Salvete Omnes,
> > yes, I agree Domitianus, you have to add atheists and agnostics.
>
> And "Catholic (Not Roman)" for any Reformed Catholics, United
> Catholics, Old Catholics, etc... who are still Catholics but
> who are in formal disagreement with the Vatican.
>
> -- Marinus

Salve,

Marinus is correct. There are other autocephelis churches that go by
the name Catholic, Polish National Catholic for one, that are not in
formal union with the Holy See. (There is a difference between the
Vatican and the Holy See, the Vatican is a nation, the Holy See is
the office of the Pope.) There are also Eastern Rite Catholics, such
as Ukranian, Maronite, and Melkite, whose Bishops are in formal union
with the Holy See. Strictly speaking Roman Catholic is only the
Latin Rite of the Catholic Church, and no matter how much the
Maronite Rite is in union with the Holy See, they would be insulted
to be called "Roman Catholic."

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12550 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 07:21:30PM -0700, L. Sicinius Drusus wrote:
> Salvete Quirites,
> This post is a prime example of why Caius Minucius
> Scaevola is the LAST person in Nova Roma who should be
> lecturing people about using offensive terms.

Whereas a rabid-weasel grudge-harboring psychotic like you is the one to
lecture on matters of morality. Of course.

Yep... that's about enough of you for a lifetime.

*Plonk!*


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Fortes fortuna adiuvat.
Fortune favours the brave.
-- Terence, "Phormio"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12551 From: aoctaviaindagatrix Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: "Xtian" (WAS: Tha Back Alley)
Salvete,

My goodness! Bit stiff, isn't it? Many of the respondents aren't
Xian or Christian or whatever everyone determines is okay to call
it.

Valete,
Annia Octavia Indagatrix

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla"
<alexious@e...> wrote:
> Ave,
>
> But your not a Christian. So, your post is irrelevant, then, since
your not a Christian.
>
> Vale,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: A. Apollonius Cordus
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 9:31 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] "Xtian" (WAS: Tha Back Alley)
>
>
> A. Apollonius Cordus to Senator & Consular Q. Fabius
> Maximus and all citizens and peregrines, greetings.
>
> Regarding the offensiveness of the abbreviation
> 'Xtian", you wrote:
> > Of course I have to Scaveola to task about the X in
> > Christian. The Catholic Church uses it as an
> > abbrevation in e-mail, which I doubt they would if
> > it was derogatory.
>
> I am sure the Catholic Church has no objection to
> 'Xian' as a shortened form of 'Christian': as others
> have already said, the 'X' is just a Chi standing in
> for the word 'Christ'
>
> But if I were a Christian, I *would* be offended, or
> at least puzzled, to be called a 'Xtian', since this
> would suggest either:
> - that I was a 'Christtian' - a follower of someone
> called Christt - or:
> - that the 'X' stands only for the first 5 letters of
> the word 'Christian', and that all Christians are
> followers of someone called Chris.
>
> Cordus
>
> =====
> www.collapsibletheatre.co.uk
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12552 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Wow....D. Spencer Hines.....when did you come to the Nova Roma Mail list! Welcome to Nova Roma!

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=D.+Spencer+Hines+Faq&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=B4CF6F26.5C04%25mwcook%40globalnet.co.uk&rnum=1 (link to D. Spencer Hines Faq page).

Vale,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix

----- Original Message -----
From: Caius Minucius Scaevola
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Tha Back Alley


On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 07:21:30PM -0700, L. Sicinius Drusus wrote:
> Salvete Quirites,
> This post is a prime example of why Caius Minucius
> Scaevola is the LAST person in Nova Roma who should be
> lecturing people about using offensive terms.

Whereas a rabid-weasel grudge-harboring psychotic like you is the one to
lecture on matters of morality. Of course.

Yep... that's about enough of you for a lifetime.

*Plonk!*


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Fortes fortuna adiuvat.
Fortune favours the brave.
-- Terence, "Phormio"

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12553 From: G¥IVLIVS¥SCAVRVS Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
G. Iulius Scaurus L. Cornelio Sullae Felici salutem dicit.

> Interesting, I guess I do not hang around usenet enough, I get pretty >disgusted by the ego waiving going on at soc.history.medieval to the >point that they have developed a FAQ about a particular individual >there named D. Spencer Hines, and its funny now that I think about >it...but your posts resemble his...upon observation.

While C. Minucius' posts not infrequently include what I would regard
as ill-considered and intemperate language, he is not in D. Spencer
Hines' league. In fact, I have never encountered anyone in NR who is
within ten standard deviations of being as much a consumate, venomous,
anti-semitic asshole as Hines. No one here has stalked another
citizen, nor attempted to persuade an employer to discharge another
citizen, nor published to the internet private, personal information of
interest to identity thieves about another citizen. If the Christian
hell, in which I do not believe, were to exist, I would expect
eventually to find Hines there burnishing the arse of his intellectual
kinsman Adolf Hitler with his lips, a few feet from Satan's throne in
the deepest, frozen region described by Dante.

Vale.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12554 From: Gaius Galerius Peregrinator Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: participles
Salve:

Participles in Latin is a big question, but the answer you're looking
for may be very simple.

The participle (participium) is something in between a noun (nomen)and a
verb (verbum). It is not exactly a verb and not quite a noun so they
called it a participle, and it functions as adjective with a verbal aspect,
and in Latin they decline like a noun, that is, change endings according to
their function in the sentence.

Examples of participles:

She is a LOVING person.

He is EATING the apple.

Both are participles, and that's really the gist of it.

I hope that helps.

Vale

Gaius Galerius Peregrinator




----Original Message Follows----
From: Hedea Bianchia Dryantilla <hedeabianchia@...>
Reply-To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] participles
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 22:55:15 -0400

Does anyone have any helpful hints for understanding, remembering, and
using participles? I have a hard time with them in English, and in Latin it
is almost unbearable.

Dryantilla

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12555 From: G¥IVLIVS¥SCAVRVS Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Harris on Philology
G. Iulius Scaurus S. P. D.

Avete, Quirites.

Here a links to a few of William Harris' delightful essays on Latin
philology:

"The Pronunciation of Latin: Ancient and Modern Pronunciations":

http://community.middlebury.edu/~harris/LatinBackground/
Pronunciation.html

"Phonematic Length of Latin Vowels":

http://community.middlebury.edu/~harris/LatinBackground/
PhonemicLength.html

"How to Read Latin Poetry":

http://community.middlebury.edu/~harris/LatinBackground/
PoetryandReadingVerse.html

"Stress and Accent in Latin Prose":

http://community.middlebury.edu/~harris/LatinBackground/
Stress.Pronunciation.html

Harris (Emeritus, Middlebury College), always outspoken and
extraordinarily erudite, has made available some of the best resources
for the teaching and study of Latin on the internet.

Valete, Quirites.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12556 From: Sp. Postumius Tubertus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Salvete Consul Quintilliane et Alii Lectores,

> You are already on part of that road as my Accensus and Scriba to the
> Curator Araneum. To become an Accensus or Scribe is the best way to
> get to know how the job is done. If some one is interested you should
> contact the Magistrate in question and tell him/her that You are
> willing to work. ;-) This way You may become an Accensus, Legatus or
> Scriba. Still it is good to not take on too many positions. ;-)

This last point is true, as I am rapidly finding! ;-) I've given thought to offering to be a Legatus (and, perhaps, Praetor Provincialis someday), but at the time the option was open to me, I was far too new to Nova Roma (in fact, I was nowhere near being a citizen at that point), and still a bit too young to take on that responsibility. But I should hope I am on my way to becoming Consul someday by working under some of the best.

Aside: As a note to the others who may be reading this, if any of you are considering running for Aedile or Praetor next year, and are in need of a scribe, my e-mail address is listed in the Album Civium (with about three alternates). Don't hesitate to write! Please!! I have prior experience!!! ::End Aside

Valete Consul et Lectores,

Sp. Postumius Tubertus
Faithful Accensus, Scriba, Retiarius, and Tax Paying Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12557 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Salve, G. Iuli -

On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 05:15:30AM -0000, GÂ¥IVLIVSÂ¥SCAVRVS wrote:
> G. Iulius Scaurus L. Cornelio Sullae Felici salutem dicit.
>
> > Interesting, I guess I do not hang around usenet enough, I get pretty >disgusted by the ego waiving going on at soc.history.medieval to the >point that they have developed a FAQ about a particular individual >there named D. Spencer Hines, and its funny now that I think about >it...but your posts resemble his...upon observation.
>
> While C. Minucius' posts not infrequently include what I would regard
> as ill-considered and intemperate language, he is not in D. Spencer
> Hines' league.

While "intemperate" is purely a matter of opinion, "ill-considered" is
no more than faulty guesswork on your part. The fact that you're expert
in Roman history is quite a large coin here, and your learning in that
area is admirable, but I'd suggest watching those potshots; they may
ricochet.

> In fact, I have never encountered anyone in NR who is
> within ten standard deviations of being as much a consumate, venomous,
> anti-semitic asshole as Hines. No one here has stalked another
> citizen, nor attempted to persuade an employer to discharge another
> citizen, nor published to the internet private, personal information of
> interest to identity thieves about another citizen. If the Christian
> hell, in which I do not believe, were to exist, I would expect
> eventually to find Hines there burnishing the arse of his intellectual
> kinsman Adolf Hitler with his lips, a few feet from Satan's throne in
> the deepest, frozen region described by Dante.

Nice description. What was that bit about "intemperate", again? Or is
there some as-yet-unknown reason that you're allowed to express strong
negative opinions while others aren't?


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate.
Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily.
-- Principle known as Occam's Razor, "used for example in physics."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12558 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
In a message dated 7/2/03 5:09:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ben@...
writes:


> In fact, I did exactly that a
> while ago when I found out that "Oriental" was deprecated by many people
> in favor of "Asian".
>
>

Except in ancient texts of course. If I translated Oriental to mean Asian,
I'd be drummed out
of the league of military historians

Fabius


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12559 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 02:24:26AM -0400, qfabiusmaxmi@... wrote:
> In a message dated 7/2/03 5:09:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ben@...
> writes:
>
>
> > In fact, I did exactly that a
> > while ago when I found out that "Oriental" was deprecated by many people
> > in favor of "Asian".
> >
> >
>
> Except in ancient texts of course. If I translated Oriental to mean Asian,
> I'd be drummed out
> of the league of military historians

Oh, without a doubt. There's very little that's universally true, and
/reductio ad absurdum/ can be useful as a tool to find the limits of
applicability - but here, the limits are obvious and reasonably well
defined. I'll continue to use "Oriental" where it's appropriate, as in
the above case, but not to describe, e.g., a conversational partner.


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Quam bene vivas refert, non quam diu.
The important thing isn't how long you live, but how well you live.
-- Seneca Philosophus, "Epistulae"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12560 From: Laureatus Armoricus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Resignations - a few thoughts
Salve Pauline et omnes,

Dixit Paulinus :

"My only question to those who would pull the plug on Nova Roma
because sombody's statements offended them is this: Where are you
going to run to in the world where you shall be free of these
troubles? I tried pointing that out to a lady last year who was
leaving and thought the Academic universities would be the answer and
be able to handle things with dignity"

Respondeo : A very good point, Lani Pauline. However, if I talk from my own
experience, it is not so much the infighting that led some us to leave but
the fact that we do not see each other often enough. What is the point in
struggling for something you think is right only to see the results
electronically ? i am for example a member of an archaelogical association
with apparent link to the real world (ie site visits, meetings, news letter,
AGM etc). Although I am sure some nasty business can happen here and there
such an association has the advantage of providing "real" benefits and a
sense of belonging.

Fortunately i feel NR is now heading that way. The census will remove a lot
of dead wood, meetings are being organised and people clearly want to get in
touch with one another more than by e-mail. This is why I came back. I hope
that explain some of the leavers' line of thought.

Optime valete
Corn. Moravius Laureatus Armoricus
"To a man with a hammer, every issue looks like a nail"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12561 From: Franciscus Apulus Caesar Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Salve Sulla,
the URL don't run ... "page not found"!
Maybe you're hiding it because you feel ashamed to have written
it ... :-)
Don't worry, it's a joke. :-))
I'm very interesting to read your handbook, where I can find it.

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla"
<alexious@e...> wrote:
> Avete Omnes,
>
> There was a Censor handbook located at
www.earthlink.net/~alexious. Created by myself and Oppius Flaccus
Severus (ex-citizen) and my colleague at the time Lucius Equitius
Cincinnatus. It had a very good breakdown of the office of Censor
including various scenarios that we (ex-Censors) have encountered in
the past.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sp. Postumius Tubertus
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC
for NEW NOVA ROMANS
>
>
> Salve Quinte Amice et Magistratus Capitolini,
>
> <cut>
>
> > Now my question to the administration is this: In the macro
world we
> > are allowed to go into our legistatures during certain times
and
> > observe the proccedings and debates. Is there any way the
citizens
> > here can drop in on the various websites on a strictly
moderated
> > status where our government does its business; for example -
how does
> > the censor department work, what knowledge is needed to keep
the
> > records, how are the senate debates conducted (on various chat
> > systems?) how do our Quaestors organize our financing; what
are the
> > mechanisms etc, how does our election department and the
rogotars
> > organize and conduct their business. I realize there are
limitations
> > because of personal privacy etc but is there any way tours
could be
> > arranged? If not how does one learn? If someone wishes to run
for
> > censor in 2 years, how is he groomed for the job for example?
>
> As regards the Senate issue, I believe this debate happened
sometime at the end of last year or the beginning of this year. In
any case, the Senate doors are not open to the public. It happens to
be the duty of the Tribuni Plebis to report to the people what goes
on in the Senate. That said....
>
> I myself would like to know how the Censores conduct their
business, how they keep records, and the like, as well as how the
Rogatores get the votes for each election, et cetera. I can say that
I hope to attain the office of Censor someday (and by that point, it
would most likely have changed greatly from what it is now), but
before I run for any office, I too would like to know how the
offices operate.
>
> Valete,
>
> Sp. Postumius Tubertus
> Tax Paying Citizen of New Rome
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12562 From: G¥IVLIVS¥SCAVRVS Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: participles
G. Iulius Scaurus Hedeae Bianchiae Dryantillae salutem dicit.

Salve, H. Biancha.

Allen and Greenough's _New Latin Grammar_ can be found at the Perseus
Project and Middlebury College:

http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=
Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0001

http://community.middlebury.edu/~harris/AG_1.html

Orbis Latinus has William Harris' _The Intelligent Person's Guide to
the Latin Language_:

http://www.orbilat.com/Latin/Alternative_Grammars/index.html

Both have discussions of the grammar, syntax and morphology of Latin
participles. If you have further questions after consulting these two
grammars, please feel free to email me for other citations.

Vale.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12563 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Gee, I wonder where the steerotype that Linux nerds
are scantimonus elitist dweebs utterly lacking in
social skills came from?

Couldn't be anyone we know could it?

--- Caius Minucius Scaevola <ben@...> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 07:21:30PM -0700, L.
> Sicinius Drusus wrote:
> > Salvete Quirites,
> > This post is a prime example of why Caius Minucius
> > Scaevola is the LAST person in Nova Roma who
> should be
> > lecturing people about using offensive terms.
>
> Whereas a rabid-weasel grudge-harboring psychotic
> like you is the one to
> lecture on matters of morality. Of course.
>
> Yep... that's about enough of you for a lifetime.
>
> *Plonk!*
>
>
> Caius Minucius Scaevola
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Fortes fortuna adiuvat.
> Fortune favours the brave.
> -- Terence, "Phormio"
>


=====
L. Sicinius Drusus

Roman Citizen

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12564 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
Salvete Praetores,

I believe in freedom of speech, but C Minucius emails are not expressing an
opinion at all regarding Nova Roma and the current issues. It is bandwidth
for the specific purpose of intimidating citizens so much that he/she will
not speak anymore.

Please resend me the list guidelines. I would like to see for myself whether
the following comments are within them:

-referring to another citizen as "rabid-weasel grudge-harboring psychotic?
- referring to another citizen as 'dull, unintelligent, unsubtle"
-telling a fellow citizen to "shog off", which is a censored version of
"fuck off" but has the same meaning.

The list above can go and on since he sends this type of email on a daily
basis.

Vale,
Diana Moravia



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12565 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: "Xtian" (WAS: Tha Back Alley)
A. Apollonius Cordus to Senator & Consular L.
Cornelius Sulla, Senator & Consular Q. Fabius Maximus,
and all citizens and peregrines, greetings.

> My dear Apollonius. I do not believe Lucius
> Cornelius is annoyed with you. I believe he is
> annoyed with the PC nature of this discussion to
> which you just added an amusing additional brick.
> In otherwords it is not dying. But seems to be
> enduring.

After reading this and then re-reading the whole
thread, I think I've managed to understand what's
happened. Senator Sulla, I think it was in response to
a message of yours that someone asked for the meaning
of 'Xtian' or 'Xian', whichever it was, and among the
responses to that question was the statement of
Minucius Scaevola that some Christians find the usage
offensive. What I have only just understood is that -
and please correct me if I'm wrong, because I'm only
guessing - you felt this to be a criticism, since you
had used the abbreviation with no offensive intent.

If this is so, then I can now understand why you are
frustrated with the general thread, and why you
responded so curtly to my contribution. Had I
understood this at the time, I wouldn't have been so
put out by your response, so please ignore it. I
certainly didn't mean to suggest that your use of the
term was intended to be offensive, or that I found it
offensive.

In fact I have to agree with Senator Maximus that this
discussion has gone on longer than it really needed
to, considering that no one has actually said they
found the comment offensive. Scaevola's comment was
not a criticism, I think, but just a point of
information: he was not suggesting that you shouldn't
have said it, just that some people might take it the
wrong way. It seems a series of misunderstandings has
caused us all to get upset over almost nothing.

So I'm sorry for my last curt message on this topic,
and I hope you won't take it badly; likewise I take no
offense at yours.

Cordus

=====
www.collapsibletheatre.co.uk

________________________________________________________________________
Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo!
Messenger http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12566 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
> > In fact, I did exactly that a
> > while ago when I found out that "Oriental" was deprecated by many people
> > in favor of "Asian".
>
> Except in ancient texts of course.

Or on the signage of about a dozen grocery stories around Lawrence Avenue,
each of which proudly proclaims itself an "Oriental Supermarket".
Apparently, the owners of such businesses aren't bothered by the term.

--
Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
http://www.graveyards.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12567 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley/ political correctness/ word definitions
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Marcus Octavius Germanicus
<hucke@c...> wrote:
>
> > > In fact, I did exactly that a
> > > while ago when I found out that "Oriental" was deprecated by
many people
> > > in favor of "Asian".
> >
> > Except in ancient texts of course.
>
> Or on the signage of about a dozen grocery stories around Lawrence
Avenue,
> each of which proudly proclaims itself an "Oriental Supermarket".
> Apparently, the owners of such businesses aren't bothered by the
term.
>
> --
> Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
> http://www.graveyards.com/

Salve Marce,

1) LOL. I think changing names for political correctness is getting
rather silly. We have a mountain in Alberta called Chinaman's Peak
that a Chinese railroad worker climbed in record time to win some
sort of bet in the late 19th century. People got in an uproar about
changing the name to Ling Tao or something. There was a huge fight in
the media and especially on radio talk shows. Some conservatve
announcer jumped in the fray and said " Judas H priest. What's wrong
with you people, jeez - we say Frenchman, Irishman, Scotsman,
Englishman; what was ever the problem with Chinaman? That debate
certainly eclipsed many of ours.

2) I read some years back that many schools wanted to edit the Tom
Sawyer and Huckleberry fin books because the "n" word was used 30 or
40x. That was then and that was the reality of the south. Well if we
were take our present books or movies and time ship them back 50 -
100 years the casual use of the "f" word, "mofo" etc would not be
socially acceptable and treated with comtempt as the "n" word is now.

3) We are lucky that the ultra conservative climate in the 18th and
19th century did not use their political correct ideas and sand scrub
off all the obscene grafitti on the walls of Pompeii and many other
Roman sites.

Well I hope we don't get carried away with this!


On this note here is another interesting word origin - Wog!

It is of course an offensive term but its origin kind of ties in to
this thread. Apparently in WW1 the Egyptians, Arabs and East Indians
were doing a great job helping the British defeat the Ottoman Empire
in the middle east. Unfortunately the British treated the more
colored people with contempt and disrespect. General Kitchener was
smart enough to see the problem so he issued this order to the
Btitish military authorities " From now on you will cease calling our
gallant allies ni..s, kaffirs, fuzzywuzzies, bush monkeys,
spearchuckers etc. You are ordered to refer to them as " Worthy
Oriental Gentlemen!" Hence they came up with the acronym "wog" to of
course bypass the regulation.



Regards,

Quintus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12568 From: Paula Drennan Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: The Religion Poll
> Salve Claudia,
>
> My friend Tiberius is very honorable and a true Roman with good ideas
> who works very hard for us. I can't read his mind but if he got the
> slightest inkling that a poll like this could evolve into something
> ugly he would not hesitate to pull it.
>
> When we all signed up for NR we knew that the Religio Romano is the
> state religion and must be respected and tolerated; especially by
> magistrates. The religio in turn, also tolerates our single-god
> beliefs and membership in this community. Now suppose the pole at
> this date and time showed 95% of us were not practitioners of the
> Religio Romano, then I could see the stats being used as a weapon to
> alter the status of the religio somewhere down the line in future.
> This of course could tear NR to pieces and finish it for good. Also
> we must appreciate that this whole institution was founded an
> organized mostly by the people who wished to practice and make
> Religio Romano as one of the main pillars. For these reasons I think
> some things are better left unsaid. I confess, I got talked into
> setting up a poll here last year asking people on their thoughts of
> the afterlife and deities but a number of people wrote in to request
> a cancellation of the poll; I only got 12 replies which I regarded as
> a polite way of telling me to piss off.
>
> On a more positive note maybe some other Muslim members may see these
> 2 postings and contact you in private or on the ML. Please let us
> know what transpires.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus

Salve,
Oh, I perfectly understand, ans would not want anything to happen that would
endanger Nova Roma in that way. I was looking at it from more of a curiosity
stand point, things like that interest me. And if ther are other Muslims on
this list, I would really like to meet them.
Vale,
Claudia Fabia Calpurnia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12569 From: Tiberius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: The Senate is now in session
Salve Diana
Any word on how all the voting went?

Vale
----- Original Message -----
From: Diana Moravia Aventina
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Cc: tribunes@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 8:49 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] The Senate is now in session


Salvete citizens of Nova Roma!

The auspices were taken by Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus Augur and having
found to be propitious, Junior Consul T Labienus Fortunatus has convened the
Senate. The discussions began at 1 AM Roman time on June 26 and will
continue through 1 AM Roman time on June 29th. Voting shall start
immediately thereafter, lasting until 1 AM Roman time on July 1st.

Since July 1st is a dies nefastus* and is not suitable for voting following
the decreta of the Collegium Pontificum, Consul T Labienus Fortunatus
strongly recommended that all senatores vote on June 29 or June 30 which are
dies comitiales**.

For the information of the citizens of Nova Roma, here is a brief version of
the Senate's agenda:

I. Permission for Diana Moravia Aventina to organize a Gallo-Roman weekend
in Tongeren, Gallia next year in Nova Roma's name.

II. Permission for Gaius Lanius Falco to print Nova Roman business cards and
to use the Nova Roma flag on these cards for the purpose of publicizing Nova
Roma.

III. The approval of an application for sponsorship of Legio XXI commanded
by Kaeso Maximius Tiberius.

*A dies nefastus is a day on which no legal action or public voting may
occur.
**A dies comitalis is a day on which citizens may vote on political or
criminal matters.

Valete,
Diana Moravia Aventina
Tribunus Plebis


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12570 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Word Origins / Latin
Is this where Friggin comes from?
LOL.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, me-in-@d... wrote:
> Three Viking longships pull up on shore.
> Men of the first run up the beach waving their swords "By Odin 'tis
our turn to pillage the monasteries and ransack the manors!"
> Men of the second run up the beach waving axes over their head "By
Thor, 'tis our turn to slay the men and slaughter all the cattle for
a great feast!".
> Men of the third stagger up the beach trying to keep each other
upright "By Frigg, it can't be our turn *yet again* to ravish all
those women!"
>
> Caesariensis,
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From : "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@d...>
> To : Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date : 02 July 2003 18:33:06
> Subject : [Nova-Roma] Re: Word Origins / Latin
> Salve my friend Marce!
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Personalised email by http://another.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12571 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Salve Quintus,
That is extremely helpful.
It is appreciated very much.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I found a good website for our newbies and no doubt some older Nova
> Romans that organizes everything in a nutshell so you'll catch on
to
> the system quicker. I suggest you book mark the site and also print
> off a copy to keep by your computer as political issues are
discussed
> on the ML. Hopefully everthing will fall into place.
>
> http://www.vroma.org/~bmcmanus/romangvt.html
>
>
> Now my question to the administration is this: In the macro world
we
> are allowed to go into our legistatures during certain times and
> observe the proccedings and debates. Is there any way the citizens
> here can drop in on the various websites on a strictly moderated
> status where our government does its business; for example - how
does
> the censor department work, what knowledge is needed to keep the
> records, how are the senate debates conducted (on various chat
> systems?) how do our Quaestors organize our financing; what are the
> mechanisms etc, how does our election department and the rogotars
> organize and conduct their business. I realize there are
limitations
> because of personal privacy etc but is there any way tours could be
> arranged? If not how does one learn? If someone wishes to run for
> censor in 2 years, how is he groomed for the job for example?
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12572 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Salveta,
What was actually deemed offensive by the word Xian?
Was it an inference or an implication?
Was the offended christian? If so:
What happened to the true christian attitude of turn the other cheek?
Curious questions.
Valete




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
> Salve gentlemen,
>
> I think a few postings on this matter may have been be overlooked.
> Anyway what Drusus says is correct. I grew up in the RC church;
> priests in those days had to study Latin and have some exposure to
> Greek and knew PX meant Chi Roh. You cannot and could not become a
> priest without a university degree so they all knew about these
> different issues and yes, the Roman and Greek world.
> We used xmas all the time on greetings and stationary as did the
> calenders to save space. I never heard 1 complaint from the RC
church
> at all. Unfortunately many Christians, though well read on the
bible
> do not know diddley squat about the socio-economic-political
history
> of Rome and the ancient world. Such statements of condemnation just
> display a lack of understanding and these sensitivities and
problems
> are only going to get worse as history has been dropped as a
> compulsory subject from many institutions.
>
> Regards
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
> SNIP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12573 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Salve Propraetor!


> In this my experience differs from yours. I can assure you that
> at St. Benedict's parish, in the Archdioces of Detroit, the nuns
> would have given a severe tongue-lashing to anyone who dared
> use X-mas as an abbreviation. It was not only frowned upon, but
> actively spoken against in every year's religion class from 1st
> through 8th grade.
>
> -- Marinus

So you grew up being taught by nuns also! A difference for me is
that the nuns of "Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary Elementary
School" in Biloxi, MS would have (and frequently did) lash me with
something more substantial than a tongue (usually a ruler or the
dreaded pointer) ;-O.

Vale,
Gaius Popillius Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12574 From: Gaius Galerius Peregrinator Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Salve:

As concerning the debates in the Senate, and you may remember when it
was brought up some time ago, I concluded their deliberations are not the
kind we think of as in a regular legistative body but rather a cabinet
meeting, and I suppose they're right to keep it behind closed doors
otherwise it would turn into another ML mess because we have too much
demogoguery and I am one who spoke for opening it up but now I see it is not
a good idea really. And since I am already here, could anybody tell me,
aren't everybody supposed to be socii unless they pay their taxes? I really
blanked out the details. when people start repeating things over and over
the delete button gets hot and I end up missing out.

Vale

Gaius Galerius Peregrinator

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12575 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley Xian
Salve Senator,
You can please some of the people some of the time but not all of the
people all of the time.
Though this observation was stated much later in history it is still
applicable to this discussion.
There will always be someone somewhere that finds fault with
something however inconsequential to everyone else.
Examples of this in the media are all too common and a master at it
is the Rev. Al Sharpton.
He can take the most innocent of actions or comments and turn it into
a legal circus.
So, what are we to do?
Fuel the fire or deprive it?
Just a modest observation.
Vale

>
> Laying burden of proof on the accuser rather than the
> accused is a long standing concept that most consider
> fair.
>
> If someone enters this group and claims that the terms
> "Christ" and "Christian" are offensive to them because
> Christos means the anoited one, making the name a
> claim that thier faith is the only true one, will you
> launch a crusade to stop the use of the word
> "Christian"?
>
> Some people are offended by any usage of the word
> "black" as a synonym for evil claiming it's racist.
> Have you purged "Black Magic" and "Blackhearted" from
> your vocabulary?
>
>
> =====
> L. Sicinius Drusus
>
> Roman Citizen
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12576 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Salve,
Maybe someone should write the Vatican for an official decree and lay
this point to rest (if interested and inclined to do so)?
Or, we can just keep spinning it around (going nowhere at top speed).
Either way is OK with me but I hate to see so much fervent energy not
better utilized.
Vale


SNIP>
> In this my experience differs from yours. I can assure you that
> at St. Benedict's parish, in the Archdioces of Detroit, the nuns
> would have given a severe tongue-lashing to anyone who dared
> use X-mas as an abbreviation. It was not only frowned upon, but
> actively spoken against in every year's religion class from 1st
> through 8th grade.
>
> -- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12577 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: "Xtian" (WAS: Tha Back Alley)
Salve let's get this right I asked what LCS meant by Xtian, he told me and we moved on.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: A. Apollonius Cordus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 8:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] "Xtian" (WAS: Tha Back Alley)


A. Apollonius Cordus to Senator & Consular L.
Cornelius Sulla, Senator & Consular Q. Fabius Maximus,
and all citizens and peregrines, greetings.

> My dear Apollonius. I do not believe Lucius
> Cornelius is annoyed with you. I believe he is
> annoyed with the PC nature of this discussion to
> which you just added an amusing additional brick.
> In otherwords it is not dying. But seems to be
> enduring.

After reading this and then re-reading the whole
thread, I think I've managed to understand what's
happened. Senator Sulla, I think it was in response to
a message of yours that someone asked for the meaning
of 'Xtian' or 'Xian', whichever it was, and among the
responses to that question was the statement of
Minucius Scaevola that some Christians find the usage
offensive. What I have only just understood is that -
and please correct me if I'm wrong, because I'm only
guessing - you felt this to be a criticism, since you
had used the abbreviation with no offensive intent.

If this is so, then I can now understand why you are
frustrated with the general thread, and why you
responded so curtly to my contribution. Had I
understood this at the time, I wouldn't have been so
put out by your response, so please ignore it. I
certainly didn't mean to suggest that your use of the
term was intended to be offensive, or that I found it
offensive.

In fact I have to agree with Senator Maximus that this
discussion has gone on longer than it really needed
to, considering that no one has actually said they
found the comment offensive. Scaevola's comment was
not a criticism, I think, but just a point of
information: he was not suggesting that you shouldn't
have said it, just that some people might take it the
wrong way. It seems a series of misunderstandings has
caused us all to get upset over almost nothing.

So I'm sorry for my last curt message on this topic,
and I hope you won't take it badly; likewise I take no
offense at yours.

Cordus

=====
www.collapsibletheatre.co.uk

________________________________________________________________________
Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo!
Messenger http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12578 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Resignations - a few thoughts
By Jupiters Balls, a voice of reason!
Blessed Be!


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I was thinking over the last few days of why people resign from NR.
> I'm not talking about our political offices but totally leaving the
> NR group. To begin with, most of us observed NR on the main list
for
> a time and got some idea of what is in store for us. That may be
the
> point to make our yes or no decision. You know, its a little more
> sensible to break off a from a troubled relationship before a
> marriage rather than after. We all get heated up or down right
> frustrated after nasty debates. I confess there were a few times
> during the year when I felt like sticking my hand through the
> computer srceen and wringing someone's neck, just like on the Bugs
> Bunny Cartoons. I spoke up a few times about moving heated nasty
> debates to another list but other fellow citizens gave some valid
> reasons why we should not do so.
>
> My only question to those who would pull the plug on Nova Roma
> because sombody's statements offended them is this: Where are you
> going to run to in the world where you shall be free of these
> troubles? I tried pointing that out to a lady last year who was
> leaving and thought the Academic universities would be the answer
and
> be able to handle things with dignity. Nonsense I said. Here is
what
> I have experienced:
>
> 1) Universities - A few of my neighbours were profs. They told me
the
> stories of the infighting, back stabbing and posturing, especially
> around tenure and grant times. Publish or perish was their motto.
>
> 2) Military - Dad was a senior Naval officer. Mom always told me
> about the hypocracy and back biting and shennanigans. Still see
that
> with my friends who serve.
>
> 3) Oil Patch - Yep, my foray; thousands of these stories and the
> finger pointing when things go wrong. I am currently treading
> carefully as I am in the field working for 2 geologists who are
> having some political differences on this project.
>
> 4) Health Care - Lots of conflicts there. Got my earfulls when we
> used to party with the nurses on weekends.
>
> 5) Corporate World - Self explanitory.
>
> 6) Churches/religious institutions - Sometimes dwarf all of the
above
> with their internal politics.
>
> Well the list could go on and on. I think we all have to learn to
be
> a little thicker skinned. The only time we'll ever get away from
this
> will certainly be time enough - in the grave.
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12579 From: philippusflaviusconservatusmaior Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Word Origins
Once a roman commander got a message by delegate of the city he
sieges.
"They have got hoards of aliments for ten years"
Thereupon the roman commander replyed nonchalant:
"Then i will conquer the city at the 11th year."

The effect on this the city capitulared immediately.



Vale
Philippus Flavius Conservatus Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12580 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: The Senate is now in session
Salve Tiberius,
Yes, the voting is done and i am only waiting for Consul T Labienus to
approve the results that I tallied. Expect an official announcement any
moment now!

Vale!
Diana Moravia



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12581 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Religious Reform was The Religion Poll
Salvete everyone.
I wonder if this is how it happened the last time?
First with dissagreement over words and phrases then by people being
offended by talk, words and labels.
Then to taking offense in an "offensive as opposed to defensive" way.
Then the torture killing and conversion in the name of these beliefs?
Who knows where it all began but I wish we did so we could prevent
similar mistakes now.
Valete all.

SNIP
> > My friend Tiberius is very honorable and a true Roman with good
ideas
> > who works very hard for us. I can't read his mind but if he got
the
> > slightest inkling that a poll like this could evolve into
something
> > ugly he would not hesitate to pull it.
> >
> > When we all signed up for NR we knew that the Religio Romano is
the
> > state religion and must be respected and tolerated; especially by
> > magistrates. The religio in turn, also tolerates our single-god
> > beliefs and membership in this community. Now suppose the pole at
> > this date and time showed 95% of us were not practitioners of the
> > Religio Romano, then I could see the stats being used as a weapon
to
> > alter the status of the religio somewhere down the line in future.
> > This of course could tear NR to pieces and finish it for good.
Also
> > we must appreciate that this whole institution was founded an
> > organized mostly by the people who wished to practice and make
> > Religio Romano as one of the main pillars. For these reasons I
think
> > some things are better left unsaid. I confess, I got talked into
> > setting up a poll here last year asking people on their thoughts
of
> > the afterlife and deities but a number of people wrote in to
request
> > a cancellation of the poll; I only got 12 replies which I
regarded as
> > a polite way of telling me to piss off.
> >
> > On a more positive note maybe some other Muslim members may see
these
> > 2 postings and contact you in private or on the ML. Please let us
> > know what transpires.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Quintus
>
> Salve,
> Oh, I perfectly understand, ans would not want anything to happen
that would
> endanger Nova Roma in that way. I was looking at it from more of a
curiosity
> stand point, things like that interest me. And if ther are other
Muslims on
> this list, I would really like to meet them.
> Vale,
> Claudia Fabia Calpurnia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12582 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Salve Gai,

1) If you haven't paid taxes you can't hold an office. You can vote
and keep your citizenship. Socii are the uncontactable people who
haven't participated in any way for ages.

2) I speak of us cicvis only observing a senatorial discussion list.
There could be an eternal moderation so outsiders would not debate
and intefere in the senate's business; very much like the assemblies
in the Roman Republic.


Regards,

Quintus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12583 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 11:58:30AM +0200, Diana Moravia Aventina wrote:
> Salvete Praetores,
>
> I believe in freedom of speech, but C Minucius emails are not expressing an
> opinion at all regarding Nova Roma and the current issues. It is bandwidth
> for the specific purpose of intimidating citizens so much that he/she will
> not speak anymore.

Ah, I see. When LSD pours out lies and insults on this list, or LCS
compares me to some sickening criminal git, it's quite fine - but when
your buddies get the replies that they deserve, it's intimidation? Thank
you for that brilliant viewpoint, Diana. It certainly shows the
fairness, honesty, and integrity that we all want to see in a Tribune.


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Quam bene vivas refert, non quam diu.
The important thing isn't how long you live, but how well you live.
-- Seneca Philosophus, "Epistulae"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12584 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Hiatus
Salvete, omnes -

I'll be off in the Poconos for a week as of later today or early
tomorrow, most likely with no access. Since I'll have ~1400 emails when
I return, urgent messages may not get the attention they deserve unless
so flagged. Phone messages, for those who have my number, will most
likely result in a faster response.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
...et praeterea censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
Furthermore, I believe Carthage should be destroyed.
(Cato Sr. After a journey to Carthage, the Roman senator concluded every speech
before the senate with this phrase, no matter the topic of discussion.)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12585 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
gaiuspopilliuslaenas <ksterne@...> writes:

> Salve Propraetor!

Salve Gaius Popillius!

> So you grew up being taught by nuns also!

I did indeed. Sisters of Mercy, Carmelites, and (for most of the
time) Sisters of Saint Joseph. Then I went to High School and
endured the tender mercies of the priests and brothers who are
Oblates of Saint Francis de Sales.

> A difference for me is
> that the nuns of "Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary Elementary
> School" in Biloxi, MS would have (and frequently did) lash me with
> something more substantial than a tongue (usually a ruler or the
> dreaded pointer) ;-O.

Yes, I've experienced those too. Also the unique experience of
being lashed with one of those huge rosaries they wore on their
belts.

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12586 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Ave,

Its been up there for over two years.....but I do recall that I am beginning to use my website for other things...I do have the files that Oppius Flaccus Severus created still.

Nice try at the joke, Fr. Apulus. LOL!

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Franciscus Apulus Caesar
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:30 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS


Salve Sulla,
the URL don't run ... "page not found"!
Maybe you're hiding it because you feel ashamed to have written
it ... :-)
Don't worry, it's a joke. :-))
I'm very interesting to read your handbook, where I can find it.

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla"
<alexious@e...> wrote:
> Avete Omnes,
>
> There was a Censor handbook located at
www.earthlink.net/~alexious. Created by myself and Oppius Flaccus
Severus (ex-citizen) and my colleague at the time Lucius Equitius
Cincinnatus. It had a very good breakdown of the office of Censor
including various scenarios that we (ex-Censors) have encountered in
the past.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sp. Postumius Tubertus
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC
for NEW NOVA ROMANS
>
>
> Salve Quinte Amice et Magistratus Capitolini,
>
> <cut>
>
> > Now my question to the administration is this: In the macro
world we
> > are allowed to go into our legistatures during certain times
and
> > observe the proccedings and debates. Is there any way the
citizens
> > here can drop in on the various websites on a strictly
moderated
> > status where our government does its business; for example -
how does
> > the censor department work, what knowledge is needed to keep
the
> > records, how are the senate debates conducted (on various chat
> > systems?) how do our Quaestors organize our financing; what
are the
> > mechanisms etc, how does our election department and the
rogotars
> > organize and conduct their business. I realize there are
limitations
> > because of personal privacy etc but is there any way tours
could be
> > arranged? If not how does one learn? If someone wishes to run
for
> > censor in 2 years, how is he groomed for the job for example?
>
> As regards the Senate issue, I believe this debate happened
sometime at the end of last year or the beginning of this year. In
any case, the Senate doors are not open to the public. It happens to
be the duty of the Tribuni Plebis to report to the people what goes
on in the Senate. That said....
>
> I myself would like to know how the Censores conduct their
business, how they keep records, and the like, as well as how the
Rogatores get the votes for each election, et cetera. I can say that
I hope to attain the office of Censor someday (and by that point, it
would most likely have changed greatly from what it is now), but
before I run for any office, I too would like to know how the
offices operate.
>
> Valete,
>
> Sp. Postumius Tubertus
> Tax Paying Citizen of New Rome
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12587 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Earlier, I had written:

> > In this my experience differs from yours. I can assure you that
> > at St. Benedict's parish, in the Archdioces of Detroit, the nuns
> > would have given a severe tongue-lashing to anyone who dared
> > use X-mas as an abbreviation. It was not only frowned upon, but
> > actively spoken against in every year's religion class from 1st
> > through 8th grade.

Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius replied:

> Maybe someone should write the Vatican for an official decree and lay
> this point to rest (if interested and inclined to do so)?
> Or, we can just keep spinning it around (going nowhere at top speed).
> Either way is OK with me but I hate to see so much fervent energy not
> better utilized.

Honestly Belisarius, I was providing information because it had been
requested. I'll thank you not to make me out as someone fanning the
flames of dispute, nor to suggest that I'm "spinning" the issue.

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12588 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
Ave,

It is up to the Praetors to moderate the citizen in question...or even the Censors to apply a nota (Good luck getting that to ever happen to anyone in the cohort).

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Diana Moravia Aventina
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:58 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Attn Praetores & Senior Consul


Salvete Praetores,

I believe in freedom of speech, but C Minucius emails are not expressing an
opinion at all regarding Nova Roma and the current issues. It is bandwidth
for the specific purpose of intimidating citizens so much that he/she will
not speak anymore.

Please resend me the list guidelines. I would like to see for myself whether
the following comments are within them:

-referring to another citizen as "rabid-weasel grudge-harboring psychotic?
- referring to another citizen as 'dull, unintelligent, unsubtle"
-telling a fellow citizen to "shog off", which is a censored version of
"fuck off" but has the same meaning.

The list above can go and on since he sends this type of email on a daily
basis.

Vale,
Diana Moravia



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12589 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
"L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@...> writes:

> Ave,
>
> It is up to the Praetors to moderate the citizen in question...or even the
> Censors to apply a nota (Good luck getting that to ever happen to anyone in
> the cohort).

Consular Sulla,

Are you suggesting that the Senior Consul or any of his cohors would
abuse their authority in order to influence the judgement of the
Praetors or the Censors? Or that either the Praetors or the Censors
would give special treatment to anyone based on their membership
in said cohors?

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12590 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
C Miniucius Scaevola,

What you say about me publicly or behind my back means very little to me.
Mr. Okopnik, the *real* Roman blood that runs through my veins has made me
strong enough to listen to your comments and to have a good laugh at them!

<Ah, I see. When LSD pours out lies and insults on this list, or LCS
<compares me to some sickening criminal git, it's quite fine - but when
<your buddies get the replies that they deserve, it's intimidation?

For the record, your questionable emails are not only directed at those two
gentlemen but to whomever says something that you disagree with.

<Thank you for that brilliant viewpoint, Diana. It certainly shows the
<fairness, honesty, and integrity that we all want to see in a Tribune.

Thank you for the compliment. It warms my little heart to know you feel that
way.

Good luck in the Poconos,
Diana Moravia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12591 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
I thought Orientalis was Latin for east or eastern...

qfabiusmaxmi@... wrote:In a message dated 7/2/03 5:09:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ben@...
writes:


> In fact, I did exactly that a
> while ago when I found out that "Oriental" was deprecated by many people
> in favor of "Asian".
>
>

Except in ancient texts of course. If I translated Oriental to mean Asian,
I'd be drummed out
of the league of military historians

Fabius


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12592 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
raymond fuentes wrote:
> I thought Orientalis was Latin for east or eastern...

Salve,

(Now I'm revealing my darkest secret: My lack of language skills!) Isn't
that "asia" in latin? East or eastern? BTW, where do I sign up for a
course in latin so I can avoid embarassing myself in the future? :)

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12593 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@...> writes:

> I thought Orientalis was Latin for east or eastern...

You're correct. It is.

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12594 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Thank you, Marinvs.

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@...> writes:

> I thought Orientalis was Latin for east or eastern...

You're correct. It is.

-- Marinus

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12595 From: Michael Loughlin Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley/ political correctness/ word definitions
Salve Quintus,
The main problem with political
correctness is that no one is ever happy. People jump
to conclusions over little things without thinking
them through. I do remember a while back a police
chief in the United States had his position terminated
as a result of him in a public speech using the term
"niggardly". Now I forget who got involved exactly
but due to its likeness to the N***** word in
pronounciation he was fired. What really made me mad
about it is that it has nothing to do with the
reference to Africans and in fact simply means "1.)
Grudging and petty in giving or spending. 2.)Meanly
small; scanty or meager." Another great example is
the attack on the confederate battle flag that was
being used by several southern states. Now personally
I don't believe it to be a racist symbol. It is to me
a symbol of southern history and heritage. Now what
makes it into that racist symbol is the fact that
public annoyances like the KKK adopt as a ploy to get
southern white people to rally behind them and their
"cause" and I use that term very loosely. One thing
this country is good at is destroying history and
relics/symbols of that history. Plus look at the
reaction the Pennsylvania Congressman or Senator (I
forget which) received when he commented on his
feelings about the practice of homosexuality. No one
can have an opinion anymore because Everyone has a
special interest group that has to shoot off and
criticize cause you disagree. Sometimes people just
need to live life and let things go but in this great
country of ours everyone has gotten fat and bloated in
the head over the concepts of "rights" and "freedoms".
However I certainly am not saying lets allow people
to just say whatever they want but rather use good
judgement and don't take everything to heart. Again
people sometimes just need to live life. That's just
my 2 cents probably loaded with flaws I'm sure but I
tried to make it clear as possible so if anything
needs clarification fire away.
Quintus Cassius
> Salve Marce,
>
> 1) LOL. I think changing names for political
> correctness is getting
> rather silly. We have a mountain in Alberta called
> Chinaman's Peak
> that a Chinese railroad worker climbed in record
> time to win some
> sort of bet in the late 19th century. People got in
> an uproar about
> changing the name to Ling Tao or something. There
> was a huge fight in
> the media and especially on radio talk shows. Some
> conservatve
> announcer jumped in the fray and said " Judas H
> priest. What's wrong
> with you people, jeez - we say Frenchman, Irishman,
> Scotsman,
> Englishman; what was ever the problem with Chinaman?
> That debate
> certainly eclipsed many of ours.
>
> 2) I read some years back that many schools wanted
> to edit the Tom
> Sawyer and Huckleberry fin books because the "n"
> word was used 30 or
> 40x. That was then and that was the reality of the
> south. Well if we
> were take our present books or movies and time ship
> them back 50 -
> 100 years the casual use of the "f" word, "mofo" etc
> would not be
> socially acceptable and treated with comtempt as the
> "n" word is now.
>
> 3) We are lucky that the ultra conservative climate
> in the 18th and
> 19th century did not use their political correct
> ideas and sand scrub
> off all the obscene grafitti on the walls of Pompeii
> and many other
> Roman sites.
>
> Well I hope we don't get carried away with this!
>
>
> On this note here is another interesting word origin
> - Wog!
>
> It is of course an offensive term but its origin
> kind of ties in to
> this thread. Apparently in WW1 the Egyptians, Arabs
> and East Indians
> were doing a great job helping the British defeat
> the Ottoman Empire
> in the middle east. Unfortunately the British
> treated the more
> colored people with contempt and disrespect. General
> Kitchener was
> smart enough to see the problem so he issued this
> order to the
> Btitish military authorities " From now on you will
> cease calling our
> gallant allies ni..s, kaffirs, fuzzywuzzies, bush
> monkeys,
> spearchuckers etc. You are ordered to refer to them
> as " Worthy
> Oriental Gentlemen!" Hence they came up with the
> acronym "wog" to of
> course bypass the regulation.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus
>
>


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12596 From: Julilla Sempronia Magna Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: The Gods smile upon the Great Champion of Rome!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius"
<mballetta@h...> wrote:
> A Ney York City cabbie is nothing compared to am Italian Taxi
driver on the Autostrada. LOL.

<g> O I don't know, Marce Ambrosi, I survived not one but four taxi
rides on the Autostrada in the last 10 days... traffic in Rome is
like a very fast, complicated dance.

with fond memories of the Eternal City,

Julilla Sempronia Magna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12597 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Neither suggesting nor fanning but actually curious to know their
take on the subject.
The vatican may have bee an over emphasis, maybe an Archdiosese would
have an answer.
There must be some official statement on the subject but I am unaware
of the proper channels one would go through to get a reply.
Nobody should take me too seriously or over critically. It is
ectremely rare whan I am and i am very clear when I mean to do so but
it is so rare that noone here may ever see it.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@c...> wrote:
>
> Earlier, I had written:
>
> > > In this my experience differs from yours. I can assure you that
> > > at St. Benedict's parish, in the Archdioces of Detroit, the nuns
> > > would have given a severe tongue-lashing to anyone who dared
> > > use X-mas as an abbreviation. It was not only frowned upon, but
> > > actively spoken against in every year's religion class from 1st
> > > through 8th grade.
>
> Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius replied:
>
> > Maybe someone should write the Vatican for an official decree and
lay
> > this point to rest (if interested and inclined to do so)?
> > Or, we can just keep spinning it around (going nowhere at top
speed).
> > Either way is OK with me but I hate to see so much fervent energy
not
> > better utilized.
>
> Honestly Belisarius, I was providing information because it had been
> requested. I'll thank you not to make me out as someone fanning the
> flames of dispute, nor to suggest that I'm "spinning" the issue.
>
> -- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12598 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: The Gods smile upon the Great Champion of Rome!
I will take my chances in a taxi before I attempt to drive by myself,
lol.
I have driven in Manhattan though the cabbies have a bad reputation
for causing accidents. I think they get into more than they cause
and an Italian taxi in the strrets of Ney York would find it a piece
of cake to navigate, lol.
The city navigation in Rome is probably more "interesting" than on
the open roads of the Autostrada to be sure.
As you know, it is something to be experienced.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Julilla Sempronia Magna"
<curatrix@v...> wrote:
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius"
> <mballetta@h...> wrote:
> > A Ney York City cabbie is nothing compared to am Italian Taxi
> driver on the Autostrada. LOL.
>
> <g> O I don't know, Marce Ambrosi, I survived not one but four taxi
> rides on the Autostrada in the last 10 days... traffic in Rome is
> like a very fast, complicated dance.
>
> with fond memories of the Eternal City,
>
> Julilla Sempronia Magna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12599 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
Oh my Lords, will you look at the butchering job my keyboard made of
that reply?
If I cringe, I can only imagine what the more attentive spellers are
thinking, lol.
Arch Diocese ?
Extremely ?
Sorry.
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius"
<mballetta@h...> wrote:
> Neither suggesting nor fanning but actually curious to know their
> take on the subject.
> The vatican may have bee an over emphasis, maybe an Archdiosese
would
> have an answer.
> There must be some official statement on the subject but I am
unaware
> of the proper channels one would go through to get a reply.
> Nobody should take me too seriously or over critically. It is
> ectremely rare whan I am and i am very clear when I mean to do so
but
> it is so rare that noone here may ever see it.
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> <gawne@c...> wrote:
> >
> > Earlier, I had written:
> >
> > > > In this my experience differs from yours. I can assure you
that
> > > > at St. Benedict's parish, in the Archdioces of Detroit, the
nuns
> > > > would have given a severe tongue-lashing to anyone who dared
> > > > use X-mas as an abbreviation. It was not only frowned upon,
but
> > > > actively spoken against in every year's religion class from
1st
> > > > through 8th grade.
> >
> > Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius replied:
> >
> > > Maybe someone should write the Vatican for an official decree
and
> lay
> > > this point to rest (if interested and inclined to do so)?
> > > Or, we can just keep spinning it around (going nowhere at top
> speed).
> > > Either way is OK with me but I hate to see so much fervent
energy
> not
> > > better utilized.
> >
> > Honestly Belisarius, I was providing information because it had
been
> > requested. I'll thank you not to make me out as someone fanning
the
> > flames of dispute, nor to suggest that I'm "spinning" the issue.
> >
> > -- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12600 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Results of Senate Vote
Tribunus Plebis Diana Moravia Aventina Quiritibus SPD

Senate Voting Results published on July 3 2756.

The Senate has finished its latest session and the votes have been tallied
as follows.

Formal debate ended on June 29 2756 at 1:00 Roman time. Voting began
immediately afterwards and ended on July 1, 2756 at 1:01 Roman time. Results
were officially published by the presiding magistrate Consul Titus Labienus
Fortunatus on the Senate list on July 3 2756.

The following 17 Senators cast votes in time. They are referred to below by
their initials, and are listed in alphabetical order by nomen:

Marcus Arminius Maior (MAM)
Marcus Cassius Julianus (MCJ)
Patricia Cassia (PC)
Lucius Cornelius Sulla (LCS) (proxy vote)
Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus (LEC)
Caeso Fabius Quintilianus (CFQ)
Quintus Fabius Maximus (QFM)
Caius Flavius Diocletianus (CFD)
Antonius Gryllus Graecus (AGG)
Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus (DIPI)
Titus Labienus Fortunatus (TLF)
Marcus Octavius Germanicus (MOG)
Lucius Pompeius Octavianus (LPO)
Gnaeus Salix Astur (GSA)
Lucius Sergius Australicus Obstinatus (LSAO)
Lucius Sicinius Drusus (LSD)
Appius Tullius Marcellus Cato (ATMC)

The following Senators cast a vote, but their vote was received after voting
had ended and therefore are not included in these results:
Marcus Minucius Audens (MMA)
Alexander Iulius Caesar Probus Macedonicus (AICPM)

The following Senator did not cast a vote [and his absence was not announced
or justified in line with the Senatus Consultum defining a quorum and the
LEX OCTAVIA DE SENATORIBUS:
Gaius Marius Merullus (CMM)

The necessary majority for a Senatus consultum was therefore 11 votes in
favor. "UTI ROGAS" indicates a vote in favor of an item, "ANTIQUO" or
"NEGAT" is a vote against, and "ABSTINEO" is an open abstention.

The Agenda items for consideration were as follows:

I. Permission is hereby given to Diana Moravia Aventina to organize a
Gallo-Roman weekend in Tongeren, Gallia next year in Nova Roma's name.

[17 passed in favour - 0 opposing]

The votes were cast as follows:

MAM UTI ROGAS
MCJ UTI ROGAS
PC UTI ROGAS, and I wish you all the best!
LCS UTI ROGAS (proxy vote)
LECA UTI ROGAS, I know it will be a blast.
CFQ UTI ROGAS: I am sure Diana will do a job with this event which will be
as good as that she did when she assisted me in organising the Rally in
Belgium last year.
QFM UTI ROGAS
CFD UTI ROGAS
AGG UTI ROGAS
DIPI UTI ROGAS. I wish Diana Moravia well as she organizes what I am sure
will be a fun and successful event.
TLF UTI ROGAS
MOG UTI ROGAS
LPO UTI ROGAS
GSA UTI ROGAS: I wish Diana Moravia good luck in the organization of this
event.
LSAO UTI ROGAS
LSD UTI ROGAS
ATMC UTI ROGAS. I wish her all success in this venture. With out doubt Diana
Moravia will do a great job of organizing this Gallo-Roman weekend.


II. Permission is hereby given to Gaius Lanius Falco to print Nova Roman
business cards for the purpose of publicizing Nova Roma. He is also given
permission to use the Nova Roman flag on said cards.

[17 passed in favour - 0 opposing]

The votes were cast as follows:

MAM UTI ROGAS
MCJ UTI ROGAS
PC UTI ROGAS
LCS UTI ROGAS (proxy vote)
LECA UTI ROGAS
CFQ UTI ROGAS: I support this good idea and hope that we may see such cards
at the Nova Roman Rally in Bologna
QFM UTI ROGAS
CFD UTI ROGAS
AGG UTI ROGAS
DIPI UTI ROGAS
TLF UTI ROGAS
MOG UTI ROGAS
LPO UTI ROGAS
GSA UTI ROGAS
LSAO UTI ROGAS
LSD UTI ROGAS
ATMC UTI ROGAS

III. The application for legio sponsorship submitted by Kaeso Maximus
Tiberius, the Commander of Legio XXI is hereby approved.

[17 passed in favour - 0 opposing]

The votes were cast as follows:

MAM UTI ROGAS
MCJ UTI ROGAS- Always good to see a new Legion!
PC UTI ROGAS and welcome.
LCS UTI ROGAS (proxy vote)
LECA UTI ROGAS
CFQ UTI ROGAS: The Sodalitas Militarium has recommended the approval of
Legion XXI and I can only wish the Legio well!
QFM UTI ROGAS
CFD UTI ROGAS
AGG UTI ROGAS
DIPI UTI ROGAS
TLF UTI ROGAS
MOG UTI ROGAS
LPO UTI ROGAS
GSA UTI ROGAS: since the Sodalitas Militarium has recommended the approval
of this legion, I see no reason to deny that consent.
LSAO UTI ROGAS
LSD UTI ROGAS
ATMC UTI ROGAS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12601 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Faction v. Fiction
I salute both of you and your words...I personally thank you...there is hope.


Gnaeus Salix Astur <salixastur@...> wrote:
Salvete Quirites; et salve, Luci Corneli Sardonice.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Lucius Cornelius Sardonicus
<l_c_sardonicus@y...> wrote:

<<snipped>>

> We are not Romans living in the Republic. We are a modern micro-
> nation. Therefore, anything we do must be a compromise between
> historical accuracy and actions that best serve our citizens. If
> the historically accurate thing is also the thing that best serves
> our citizens then we are better off for both. I believe that we
> can also agree that historical correctness is not always the thing
> that best serves Nova Roma. What then, to do?
>
>
>
> Our constitution has the following mandates, "We hereby declare our
> Nation to stand as a beacon for those who would recreate the best
> of ancient Rome" and "The primary functions of Nova Roma shall be
> to promote the study and practice of pagan Roman civilization�
> encompassing such fields as religion, culture, politics, art,
> literature, language, and philosophy." My interpretation of this
> is that if there is historical precedent in answer to an issue, we
> should follow the precedent as closely as possible within our means
> providing that the solution isn't morally abhorrent. However, if
> there is no historical precedent or no verifiable record of one,
> conjecture regarding what the Romans might have done holds no
> value. In those cases, we have leeway in how we structure
> ourselves and conduct our business. In those cases, we can happily
> do what is best for our citizens without being remiss in fulfilling
> the constitutional mandate. Do these statements make me a
> traditionalist or a modernist? Neither, I believe. They make me
> a Nova Roman with our Micro-nation's best interests at heart.

<<snipped>>

I must thank you, Luci Corneli, for bringing back these ideas to the
discussion. I can certainly subscribe your thoughts above, and I have
the impression that an overwhelming majority of our citizens will
subscribe them as well.

Of course, we can still argue about finer details; but I generally
think that this statement is in the mind and heart of every
Novoroman.

Let's work together to make our Republic stronger, wider and more
Roman. All the rest (political bickering included) is mainly a waste
of time.

CN�SALIX�ASTVR�T�F�A�NEP�TRIB�OVF


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12602 From: qfabiusmaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: A more historical "Lex Fabia de Ratione Comitie .
An open letter to the senior Consul of Nova Roma


> I am more of a doer and listener.
Since you are doer and listener, you believe that your absence from Rome
makes up for that? I have had numerous discussions with citizens off list, in the
last two weeks as well, yet I find time to run my businesses, work on
preproduction on a movie in Arizona, and organize a rock music show at Universal
City, CA tonight and yet still be able to communicate on not just the forum, but
several additional lists as well. You would think with twenty-five loyal
colleagues to do the grunt work, you'd have more time for the people.
Every other Consul I know or have had the pleasure of working with never had
a third of the personal you have, and yet were able to address the people more
than once in two weeks!

The citizens are puzzled you not addressing them, Consul Fabius. You act as
you are Iuppiter on Olympus, you show up once in a while with a bright shiny
bauble for us to play with, then re-ascend to your heights. Frankly, you were
more visible when you were Curule Aedile, then now, when you are supposed to
be the voice of Nova Roma.

There has been raised an idea about mock elections and my Accensus Illustrus
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus has offered himself to organize such, as those who
have asked for them haven't shown any interest.

Ah but I must have misunderstood. When did you give Senator Drusus imperium
to call the centuries? I must have missed that important, constitutional
changing post.
Point of law, it says only you, the junior Consul and the Praetors in your
absences
may summon the centuries for anything. I thought the people requesting tests
were sensible and logical. But for some reason you took it as an affront.
No plan works perfectly until it is tested.
Even Vedius ran his for some insignificant piece of legislation right after
its inception.

These mock elections will soon be opened > by Illustrious Gnaeus Equitius
> Marinus in his capacity as Curule Aedile.
>

I must have missed the edict on this. Or was this supposed to be it? Good
for Illustrious
G. Equitius Marinus, but doesn't he answer to you? So would that not make it
his job?
You seem put out with us, Consul Fabius. Is it because you dislike answering
to the people?
This whole thing might have been avoided if you presented the proposal to the
Senate for our input. After that is the precedent all NR Consuls usually
use. That is the reason for the Senate. To advise the Consul on matters of
importance to the State. Or do you find the Senate's intelligence not to your
liking?
It "appears" and appearances can be deceiving, I will be the first to admit
that, you were trying to get this passed expediently, with as little notice as
possible. The people wouldn't let you.

> I plan to put forward this law to the Comitia during July if no
> problems show during the mock elections. This will mean that there
> will be some shortage of time as the vote must be adjusted to the
> requirements of the Roman calendar and as I will be going to the Nova
> Roman Rally at the 31st of July.
>
But not the Senate. Fine just as long as we know where we stand.
So the people will see you there. Good. I will pass on a list of questions
I would like answered to one them, so they can see you answering. Because we
were not even sure if you were alive.

Consider, we never "see" you, your henchmen tend answer your questions for
you.
(By the way henchmen in Rome does not have the negative connotation it has in
modern day.) This raised doubt for all of us.

> I thank the citizens who have taken the time to write to me on this
> matter for their advice and help. I look forward to the opportunity
> to present a Lex incorporating so many good ideas.
>
Did you answer these mails personally, or did someone answer for you?
You see I sent you three letters about the election reform, and you never
answered me at all. Now if you cannot answer a Senator of Rome and your
Paterfamilias personally, are you telling me that you put the people above me?
Very admirable Fabius. You are a man of the people. Just that you do not seem
to be around that much for them to know you.

Looking forward to the attacks from the "free thinking" and non factional
"cohors"
in your defense. Or answer me personally from the Rostrum if you wish.

Fabius


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12603 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Gladitorial Combat
This is a nice change from all of the literal combat going on here lately! Thank you.

Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius <mballetta@...> wrote:I posted an inscription found with the bodies of two men of northern
Gaul having died in a mock sea battle in the Coloseum.

O OLEC DEM TRVX
NOSVEN DEMIS NOTRVX
DEMIS DUX

They were supposedly last words of a gladiator forced to fight for
his dinner.
Nobody here replied to the request for a translation so I went
elswhere and was able to get the following which is kind of amusing:

I ought to owe nothing for I ate nothing.

But when said in latin:
Oh, Ole them trucks
No Sven them is no trucks
Them is ducks.

I don't know the accuracy of this or the truth of it but it was
interesting and amusing.
Hope you enjoy.



Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12604 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
<Consular Sulla,
<Are you suggesting that the Senior Consul or any of his cohors would
<abuse their authority in order to influence the judgement of the
<Praetors or the Censors? Or that either the Praetors or the Censors
<would give special treatment to anyone based on their membership
<in said cohors?

My answer to your response to Sulla would be 'It certainly is beginning to
look like that, so please prove me wrong."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12605 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: A more historical "Lex Fabia de Ratione Comitie .
qfabiusmaxmi@... writes:

[Quite a lot, most of it addressed to the Senior Consul,
so I'm only going to address one question which bears
directly on me.]

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus had written:
> > These mock elections will soon be opened
> > by Illustrious Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> > in his capacity as Curule Aedile.

Quintus Fabius Maximus writes, in response:
> I must have missed the edict on this. Or was this supposed to be it?

No, it's not. I will publish an Aedilean Edicta addressing
the Mock Election after the Senior Consul presents the text
of the revised law for public review.

> Good for Illustrious G. Equitius Marinus, but doesn't he answer
> to you?

As Curule Aedile of Nova Roma, I answer only to the gods, the Senate,
and the People. When I accepted Caeso Fabius' offer to work with
him on his consular staff, I was quite clear about that. My
magistracy is not at his beck and call, nor in any way conditional
upon his opinions.

The idea of conducting the Mock Election began with Senator
Drusus, and it's one I think is good. I suggested the idea
to the Senior Consul before presenting it, out of courtesy.
But even if he had objected, I intended to conduct the Mock
Election anyway. I hope that the experience proves as
useful for all who participate as Senator Drusus and I
hope it will.

--
ex officio
Gn. Equitius Marinus
Curule Aedile
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12606 From: Gaius Galerius Peregrinator Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: POLITICAL OFFICES IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC for NEW NOVA ROMANS
Salve Lanii Pauline:

Concerning those Senate deliberations, it is not the audience I am
concerned about. And thank you for your clarification on the citizenship
question. I read the law when I voted for it, but with so much going on
back and forth one looses track of what is and what is not. Too bad not
much responsibilities, not any responsibilities, go with the privilege.
Citizenship should really be something special but that's another story.

Vale and gratias multas

Gaius Galerius Peregrinator.

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12607 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Results of Senate Vote
Salve Diana,

Thank you for publishing the results of the vote. Needles to say I
appreciate everyone's wisdom shown on these issues and feel like I'm
on cloud 9 today. Those issues were very close to home for me as you
can guess!

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12608 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Gladitorial Combat
I'm very happy you enjoyed it.
How many people can joke in a dead language too, LOL.
I did however think we had more people who could read and write Latin
here.
For shame!, lol - Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
If Caesar were alive, you'd be chained to an oar.
Thanks again.
Ave Atque Vale

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> This is a nice change from all of the literal combat going on here
lately! Thank you.
>
> Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius <mballetta@h...> wrote:I posted an
inscription found with the bodies of two men of northern
> Gaul having died in a mock sea battle in the Coloseum.
>
> O OLEC DEM TRVX
> NOSVEN DEMIS NOTRVX
> DEMIS DUX
>
> They were supposedly last words of a gladiator forced to fight for
> his dinner.
> Nobody here replied to the request for a translation so I went
> elswhere and was able to get the following which is kind of amusing:
>
> I ought to owe nothing for I ate nothing.
>
> But when said in latin:
> Oh, Ole them trucks
> No Sven them is no trucks
> Them is ducks.
>
> I don't know the accuracy of this or the truth of it but it was
> interesting and amusing.
> Hope you enjoy.
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12609 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
Diana Moravia Aventina <diana@...> writes:

> <Consular Sulla,
> <Are you suggesting that the Senior Consul or any of his cohors would
> <abuse their authority in order to influence the judgement of the
> <Praetors or the Censors? Or that either the Praetors or the Censors
> <would give special treatment to anyone based on their membership
> <in said cohors?
>
> My answer to your response to Sulla would be 'It certainly is beginning to
> look like that, so please prove me wrong."

Diana, I count you a friend, but that's just plain slanderous. Would
you please tell me (private e-mail is fine, if you prefer it) what
the heck you've seen to give you that impression?

If you honestly think me guilty of the sort of collusion that's
suggested by Consular Sulla's earlier comment, then I invite you,
I *implore* you, to invoke your Tribunal authority on behalf of
the People I've sworn an oath to. If you don't feel that there
is sufficient evidence to bring me to trial, but doubt my intent
or my actions, then for the sake of the Capitoline gods and of
Nova Roma, tell me what it is about my conduct that you find
suspect and permit me to explain myself and to change whatever
it is about how I conduct myself which leads you -- the Senior
Tribune of the Plebs -- to question my intergrity.

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12610 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Tha Back Alley
F. Galerius Aurelianus Secundus S.F.D.

I have recently been attending services at the cathedral and two other Roman Catholic churches here in Nashville. The XP (elogated P with small x in the middle) is used on the vestments of the priests. Sometimes a cluster of grapes and a spray of wheat appears on the XP (chi-rho)to represent the wine and bread used in the sacrament that is transubstantiated into the body and blood of Jesus.
We are living at an exciting time in history; namely, the transition period of the change of the astrological ages (every 2000-2200 years). We are currently in the middle of the change into the Age of Aquarius. Every time the astrological changes take place there is a reactionary period between the dominant religion of the previous age and new religions that are becoming ascendant. This can lead to a hypersensitivity among believers of the older, established faith when it comes to the titles, symbols, and believes of their spiritual path.

When I was a child, most of the people I knew in Memphis were Christians. It was before the shift had really begun and no one had a problem with holidays like Halloween, Christmas, Thanksgiving, and Easter having a lot of commercial or hidden pagan meanings. Most folks were secure in their faith because there really were no other alternatives--I was 14 before I learned that there were Buddhists in Memphis and before I met a lot of Jews. I also learned that there were different kinds of Jews whereas before I had thought they were all "just" Jews. I was 15 before I met a Moslem and was almost 20 before I came across my first "real" pagan-heathen-polytheist; of course he was a Hawaiian. By the time that I was 25 and living in Nashville, I was meeting quite a few Ceremonial Magicians, Kabbalists, Wiccans, and other pagans. Then I became one myself.

Ultimately I became a high priest of a Wiccan Circle but I was not a polytheist or a dualist pagan but still believed in a single Creator/trix manifested in two aspects--masculine and feminine.

I now practice the Roman rites, still run my Circle with my lady, and am attending Roman Catholic church. I have not taken the Eucharist yet because I have not been in a state of grace according to the believes of the Roman Church.

The point of this long rambling narrative is that there may be a perfectly legitimate reason why people are so "up in arms" about their beliefs and spirituality BUT it doesn't really matter. Religion is based on faith and a personal relationship with the higher power; emphasis on PERSONAL. It should not really matter what another person says or feels about your faith because if your god/goddess/lares/penates/ loa takes offense, then they will do something about it. Otherwise, who are we to presume to know how our deity would react and deal with the other person. I know that I am not going to be that presumptive to my Creator.

Valete.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12611 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Personal ethics - was Tha Back Alley
Wise words and I repect your position and past.
Caeli enarrant gloriam Dei
The heavans bespeak the glory of God
I posted the following in the Rligio list where it is better off but
your post prompts the copying to this list:

I hope this clears up any misunderstandings.
I was uncertain whether or not to post it as it is personal but if I
can't share with all of you, who can I share with.

The Witch is worn within the soul,
Not donned for occasion
Or Kept in a bowl.

A Witch/Nature Worshipper/Wiccan/Pagan/Esoteric lives by a code of
ethics which is built upon the Laws of Nature. Our behavior is not
regulated by a fear of what awaits us in the Afterlife, but a respect
for what awaits us in this Life. Everything, and everyone, is
connected. What we do to one another, and to our World, we do to
ourselves. As with all religious systems, there are certain beliefs.
If you are Catholic, you believe in one thing, if Jewish, you believe
in another. It is no different with Paganism.
These are my basic beliefs that I share with you. Some you will
recognize and agree with, some you might not.

I believe in the Tao; the duality of Nature, the universe of equals
and oposites. All things are feminine or masculine. Like the
Christian's Noah's Ark, all things are male and female: so it is with
dieties. If there is a God, then there is a Goddess.
I believe in reincarnation. I believe everything in Nature is
reincarnated. I believe that people can 'come back'. I believe that
you are reborn among your family and friends. Perhaps this is why
when you meet someone for the first time you feel 'as if you know
them already'.
I believe what actions we do affects others, and other's actions
affect me, as in the laws of Nature and Physics - for every action
there is an equal and oposite reaction. This is also known
as 'kharma'. You must think about your actions and act responsibly.
We were not meant to simply wander about doing whatever seems right,
without regard to a goal, and the impact of that goal. We have a
responsibility to ourselves, and to each other. One can not touch the
petal of the nearest flower without affecting the course of the most
distant star.
I do not believe in belittling anothers beliefs (unless they're
Christian - just kidding). Try to better understand their beliefs and
perhaps share with them yours. This may not always work, but respect
that they have the right to believe as they will and you have that
same right and if they are Christian, you can correct them and point
out the truth and origins of their beliefs, lol.

I believe if you make a promise (to someone else or yourself) you
must keep it. Do not give your word of honor lightly. And before you
do make a promise, make sure it is one you can morally, ethically and
socially keep. The Japanese word Giri - the burden of obligation.
Relationships are based on mutual respect. With that comes trust and
obligation. Honour and Duty are paramount to each individual. Each
individual is ultimately accountable to the self, therefore,
formation of that self demands the utmost care and attention.
I do not believe in causing intentional harm or hurt to yourself,
anyone or anything. This belief is similar to the Wiccan Rede of 'an
it harm none, do as thou wilt'.
I believe in letting our young people learn about all religions. Let
them see first hand what a specific religion is about. Let the young
people be informed without bias so they can make a rational decision
when they are old enough. In the past, I attended Catholic school and
church and I feel I am a much more stable person for having grown up
with religion, though mentally unstable for some years undoing the
guilt damage that particular religion caused, having a general
knowledge and belief system is very important for children.
Religion is not something that should be 'crammed' down anothers
throat. It is a very personal choice but the availability and the
various forms should be made available and clearly explained.
I believe in honoring our ancestors. They have blazed a trail for us
to be here today.


I'm not looking for an argument on statements or to get involved in
any prolonged diatribe to my comments.
This is me and that is it.

I welcome others who wish to say something about themselves.
Maybe we can make this a topic to share ideas and beliefs and one of
the few that have no arguing involved.
I've been exhausted by the amount of negative energy in the ML and
should learn to just avoid them there.
I hope those of you who follow similar positive beliefs can make this
list the standard to set and follow. I've met very few who follow
our ideas of Religion that are false to their calling or negative in
any way internal or external.





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@a... wrote:
> F. Galerius Aurelianus Secundus S.F.D.
>
> I have recently been attending services at the cathedral and two
other Roman Catholic churches here in Nashville. The XP (elogated P
with small x in the middle) is used on the vestments of the priests.
Sometimes a cluster of grapes and a spray of wheat appears on the XP
(chi-rho)to represent the wine and bread used in the sacrament that
is transubstantiated into the body and blood of Jesus.
> We are living at an exciting time in history; namely, the
transition period of the change of the astrological ages (every 2000-
2200 years). We are currently in the middle of the change into the
Age of Aquarius. Every time the astrological changes take place
there is a reactionary period between the dominant religion of the
previous age and new religions that are becoming ascendant. This can
lead to a hypersensitivity among believers of the older, established
faith when it comes to the titles, symbols, and believes of their
spiritual path.
>
> When I was a child, most of the people I knew in Memphis were
Christians. It was before the shift had really begun and no one had
a problem with holidays like Halloween, Christmas, Thanksgiving, and
Easter having a lot of commercial or hidden pagan meanings. Most
folks were secure in their faith because there really were no other
alternatives--I was 14 before I learned that there were Buddhists in
Memphis and before I met a lot of Jews. I also learned that there
were different kinds of Jews whereas before I had thought they were
all "just" Jews. I was 15 before I met a Moslem and was almost 20
before I came across my first "real" pagan-heathen-polytheist; of
course he was a Hawaiian. By the time that I was 25 and living in
Nashville, I was meeting quite a few Ceremonial Magicians,
Kabbalists, Wiccans, and other pagans. Then I became one myself.
>
> Ultimately I became a high priest of a Wiccan Circle but I was not
a polytheist or a dualist pagan but still believed in a single
Creator/trix manifested in two aspects--masculine and feminine.
>
> I now practice the Roman rites, still run my Circle with my lady,
and am attending Roman Catholic church. I have not taken the
Eucharist yet because I have not been in a state of grace according
to the believes of the Roman Church.
>
> The point of this long rambling narrative is that there may be a
perfectly legitimate reason why people are so "up in arms" about
their beliefs and spirituality BUT it doesn't really matter.
Religion is based on faith and a personal relationship with the
higher power; emphasis on PERSONAL. It should not really matter what
another person says or feels about your faith because if your
god/goddess/lares/penates/ loa takes offense, then they will do
something about it. Otherwise, who are we to presume to know how our
deity would react and deal with the other person. I know that I am
not going to be that presumptive to my Creator.
>
> Valete.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12612 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
Salve Gnaeus Salix Astur,
Salve D Iunius Palladius,
Salve C Fabius Quintilianus,

I see that none of you have taken the time out to reply to me. The Praetores
monitor this list everyday, no? So now a direct question to our Praetores:
Are C Minucius Scaevola's emails within list guidelines or not? Please state
your opinion on this list one way or the other.

I have commented twice publicly that I find C Minucius Scaevola's emails
verbally abusive and intimidating. Why don't any of you respond? Why is my
only response from C Minucius, this time saying that I am 'taking care of my
buddies" and sarcastically implying that I am dishonest ? So besides having
to sit by and watch C Minucius Scaevola having a free reign to insult many
citizens, now I have to sit back as he insults me as a Tribune? I am not
laughing anymore gentlemen: Put everyone on moderation who cannot discuss
things in a manner that leaves out the nasty insults.

Why does the Senior Consul remain silent when both myself and Lucius
Equitius publicly expressed our opinion that CMS is acting like the Cohors
henchman? Why do both Praetores remain silent? Don't a Senator and a Tribune
deserve an answer even if we are not speaking officially? We are working
for Nova Roma and are not just sitting on the sidelines making comments like
Scaevola is.

And despite what Scaevola thinks, his constant agressive tone does indeed
reflect badly on the Senior Consul and the present government. C Fabius
Quintilianus is a good man and a genuinely nice person, so when I see that
he sits back and lets Scaevola run at the mouth, I am wondering why he could
possibly be allowing this. So now a direct question to our Senior Consul: I
realize that you have never been a Praetor, but do you think that C Minucius
Scaevola's emails are within list guidelines or not? Do you condone this
agressive and insulting tone that he constantly uses? I've asked it before
and C Minucius replied "The above question doesn't really deserve an answer"
so I will try it again: What are C Minucius Scaevola duties in the Cohors
Consulis ?

Senior Consul, please state your opinion to this list one way or the other.
Cohors Consulis assistants need not reply. I want to speak to the Boss.

Vale,
Diana Moravia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12613 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Sorry Marinus! Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
Salve Marinus,

I'm sorry for the below email.

I've accidentally made you the victim of displaced aggression, something
which I really hate when it happens to me.... I'm annoyed at our Praetores
and you ended up getting caught in the crossfire.
Sorry about that.

Vale,
Diana

<Consular Sulla,
<Are you suggesting that the Senior Consul or any of his cohors would
<abuse their authority in order to influence the judgement of the
<Praetors or the Censors? Or that either the Praetors or the Censors
<would give special treatment to anyone based on their membership
<in said cohors?

<My answer to your response to Sulla would be 'It certainly is beginning to
<look like that, so please prove me wrong."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12614 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Sorry Marinus! Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
Diana Moravia Aventina <diana@...> writes:

> Salve Marinus,

Salve Diana,

> I'm sorry for the below email.

I'm happy to accept your apology with all my heart. Thank
you for the quick reply.

> I've accidentally made you the victim of displaced aggression, something
> which I really hate when it happens to me.... I'm annoyed at our Praetores
> and you ended up getting caught in the crossfire.

An understandable, if regretable, situation.

> Sorry about that.

Thank you for your gracious explanation.

[remaining text snipped]

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12615 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Christian, Xtian, "ExLax", or XLax.....Ex (Xactly) was Religio
---I think we truly have other things we can worry about, although I
appreciate some of the academic dialogue which has
materialized...stuff I didn't know...thanks.

Curiosity speaking here:

With respect to Fabia's comments. I follow you. And I do not wish
to endanger anyone's spiritual livelihood either. But I haven't seen
an example of this in approximately three years by a
nonpractitioner. The last time this occurred the man was banished by
the Senate for what were quite obviously callous and unnecessary
comments about the Religio, etc.

Most nonpractitioners do not deface the religio. Religion
is 'talked' about alot, and these arguments are occasional, but
interestingly enough, upon inspection of the archives, and based on
my experience here (unless someone can enlighten me differently) most
of the foohfah regarding religous controversy is started by, well
sorry, those who are 'not' nonpractitioners.

As for your comments Marcus, I am not sure what you mean by 'the last
time', as I have been away for a bit. I am pretty sure last
October's antics by that poor fellow Agorius were political in
nature, although I am not sure he himself knew that. There are a few
who felt they would benefit from a good round of religious
scapegoatism. You just have to look at who egged him on last October
via archives and who ran for office. One person apologized to me
after the fact, as there were issues against me, which were taken
rather personally, unfortunately.
To use a colloquial term, I am hotheaded when people make silly
statements accusing others, (my recent posts) but I am not a
vindictive bitch who wants to kill others aspirations, because I
think I can, or hold an office, which is largely a title of service,
and nothing more. By the same token, as a magistrate you make a vow
to the Gods to be consitutional and lawful, and when you are
petitioned to investigate issues which have some legal question as
Praetor (me) you do it...that is if you do your job like you should.
I feel kind of bad for him personally, think the boy has issues.
And his real name, interestingly enough, is the same as a man killed
fighting fires as ground zero during 9/11 (not a dig at anyone,
please). I wonder if this kid was relating to this man, as the name
is not a very common one...perhaps his dad or uncle, and he was
lashing out at the world...but this is only a wonder in my mind.

Anyway, he disappeared within days of presenting his arguments and
religious admonitions.

A shame that we have to use anyone's religious beliefs as a weapon,
and equally unfortunate that we have to tar people with the same
brush.

And these, dear Marcus, are issues that concern me as an individual
far more than the use of Christian, Xtian...Merry Xmas, any more than
we should worry about ExLax, XLax......

Xactly!
Pompeia :)



In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius"
<mballetta@h...> wrote:
> Salvete everyone.
> I wonder if this is how it happened the last time?
> First with dissagreement over words and phrases then by people
being
> offended by talk, words and labels.
> Then to taking offense in an "offensive as opposed to defensive"
way.
> Then the torture killing and conversion in the name of these
beliefs?
> Who knows where it all began but I wish we did so we could prevent
> similar mistakes now.
> Valete all.
>
> SNIP
> > > My friend Tiberius is very honorable and a true Roman with good
> ideas
> > > who works very hard for us. I can't read his mind but if he got
> the
> > > slightest inkling that a poll like this could evolve into
> something
> > > ugly he would not hesitate to pull it.
> > >
> > > When we all signed up for NR we knew that the Religio Romano is
> the
> > > state religion and must be respected and tolerated; especially
by
> > > magistrates. The religio in turn, also tolerates our single-god
> > > beliefs and membership in this community. Now suppose the pole
at
> > > this date and time showed 95% of us were not practitioners of
the
> > > Religio Romano, then I could see the stats being used as a
weapon
> to
> > > alter the status of the religio somewhere down the line in
future.
> > > This of course could tear NR to pieces and finish it for good.
> Also
> > > we must appreciate that this whole institution was founded an
> > > organized mostly by the people who wished to practice and make
> > > Religio Romano as one of the main pillars. For these reasons I
> think
> > > some things are better left unsaid. I confess, I got talked into
> > > setting up a poll here last year asking people on their
thoughts
> of
> > > the afterlife and deities but a number of people wrote in to
> request
> > > a cancellation of the poll; I only got 12 replies which I
> regarded as
> > > a polite way of telling me to piss off.
> > >
> > > On a more positive note maybe some other Muslim members may see
> these
> > > 2 postings and contact you in private or on the ML. Please let
us
> > > know what transpires.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Quintus
> >
> > Salve,
> > Oh, I perfectly understand, ans would not want anything to happen
> that would
> > endanger Nova Roma in that way. I was looking at it from more of
a
> curiosity
> > stand point, things like that interest me. And if ther are other
> Muslims on
> > this list, I would really like to meet them.
> > Vale,
> > Claudia Fabia Calpurnia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12616 From: deciusiunius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
Salve Diana Moravia,

-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Diana Moravia Aventina"
<diana@p...> wrote:
> Salve Gnaeus Salix Astur,
> Salve D Iunius Palladius,
> Salve C Fabius Quintilianus,
>
> I see that none of you have taken the time out to reply to me. The
>Praetores monitor this list everyday, no? So now a direct question
>to our Praetores:
> Are C Minucius Scaevola's emails within list guidelines or not?
>Please state your opinion on this list one way or the other.

In my opinion as praetor I would say C Minucius Scaevola's words are
not within the list guidelines. However, since Praetor is a collegial
office with mutual veto power it is best to act in unison if
possible. I have contacted my colleague to give him time to review
the offending posts and the complaints registered about them. At that
point an official response will be made.

Vale,

Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus,
Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12617 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Christian, Xtian, "ExLax", or XLax.....Ex (Xactly) was Religio
Salve Pompeia you sid in part


"those who are 'not' nonpractitioners." double negative ?


Does this mean those who DO practice the Religio Romanum or does it mean those who DO NOT practice the RR" are the ones who always start the Religious arguments ?


Pax

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus




----- Original Message -----
From: pompeia_cornelia
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:34 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Christian, Xtian, "ExLax", or XLax.....Ex (Xactly) was Religio Poll


---I think we truly have other things we can worry about, although I
appreciate some of the academic dialogue which has
materialized...stuff I didn't know...thanks.

Curiosity speaking here:

With respect to Fabia's comments. I follow you. And I do not wish
to endanger anyone's spiritual livelihood either. But I haven't seen
an example of this in approximately three years by a
nonpractitioner. The last time this occurred the man was banished by
the Senate for what were quite obviously callous and unnecessary
comments about the Religio, etc.

Most nonpractitioners do not deface the religio. Religion
is 'talked' about alot, and these arguments are occasional, but
interestingly enough, upon inspection of the archives, and based on
my experience here (unless someone can enlighten me differently) most
of the foohfah regarding religous controversy is started by, well
sorry, those who are 'not' nonpractitioners.

As for your comments Marcus, I am not sure what you mean by 'the last
time', as I have been away for a bit. I am pretty sure last
October's antics by that poor fellow Agorius were political in
nature, although I am not sure he himself knew that. There are a few
who felt they would benefit from a good round of religious
scapegoatism. You just have to look at who egged him on last October
via archives and who ran for office. One person apologized to me
after the fact, as there were issues against me, which were taken
rather personally, unfortunately.
To use a colloquial term, I am hotheaded when people make silly
statements accusing others, (my recent posts) but I am not a
vindictive bitch who wants to kill others aspirations, because I
think I can, or hold an office, which is largely a title of service,
and nothing more. By the same token, as a magistrate you make a vow
to the Gods to be consitutional and lawful, and when you are
petitioned to investigate issues which have some legal question as
Praetor (me) you do it...that is if you do your job like you should.
I feel kind of bad for him personally, think the boy has issues.
And his real name, interestingly enough, is the same as a man killed
fighting fires as ground zero during 9/11 (not a dig at anyone,
please). I wonder if this kid was relating to this man, as the name
is not a very common one...perhaps his dad or uncle, and he was
lashing out at the world...but this is only a wonder in my mind.

Anyway, he disappeared within days of presenting his arguments and
religious admonitions.

A shame that we have to use anyone's religious beliefs as a weapon,
and equally unfortunate that we have to tar people with the same
brush.

And these, dear Marcus, are issues that concern me as an individual
far more than the use of Christian, Xtian...Merry Xmas, any more than
we should worry about ExLax, XLax......

Xactly!
Pompeia :)



In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius"
<mballetta@h...> wrote:
> Salvete everyone.
> I wonder if this is how it happened the last time?
> First with dissagreement over words and phrases then by people
being
> offended by talk, words and labels.
> Then to taking offense in an "offensive as opposed to defensive"
way.
> Then the torture killing and conversion in the name of these
beliefs?
> Who knows where it all began but I wish we did so we could prevent
> similar mistakes now.
> Valete all.
>
> SNIP
> > > My friend Tiberius is very honorable and a true Roman with good
> ideas
> > > who works very hard for us. I can't read his mind but if he got
> the
> > > slightest inkling that a poll like this could evolve into
> something
> > > ugly he would not hesitate to pull it.
> > >
> > > When we all signed up for NR we knew that the Religio Romano is
> the
> > > state religion and must be respected and tolerated; especially
by
> > > magistrates. The religio in turn, also tolerates our single-god
> > > beliefs and membership in this community. Now suppose the pole
at
> > > this date and time showed 95% of us were not practitioners of
the
> > > Religio Romano, then I could see the stats being used as a
weapon
> to
> > > alter the status of the religio somewhere down the line in
future.
> > > This of course could tear NR to pieces and finish it for good.
> Also
> > > we must appreciate that this whole institution was founded an
> > > organized mostly by the people who wished to practice and make
> > > Religio Romano as one of the main pillars. For these reasons I
> think
> > > some things are better left unsaid. I confess, I got talked into
> > > setting up a poll here last year asking people on their
thoughts
> of
> > > the afterlife and deities but a number of people wrote in to
> request
> > > a cancellation of the poll; I only got 12 replies which I
> regarded as
> > > a polite way of telling me to piss off.
> > >
> > > On a more positive note maybe some other Muslim members may see
> these
> > > 2 postings and contact you in private or on the ML. Please let
us
> > > know what transpires.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Quintus
> >
> > Salve,
> > Oh, I perfectly understand, ans would not want anything to happen
> that would
> > endanger Nova Roma in that way. I was looking at it from more of
a
> curiosity
> > stand point, things like that interest me. And if ther are other
> Muslims on
> > this list, I would really like to meet them.
> > Vale,
> > Claudia Fabia Calpurnia



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12618 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Personal ethics - was Tha Back Alley
Salve Marce,

Come to visit me in my province and deep dark basement and I'll teach
ye the way of the faith. It is a hard but narrow and straight road to
heaven or hell but you "will" prevail my friend!

In the name of our Lord,

Quintus de Torquemada

"the hammer of heretics, the light of Heaven, the saviour of his
country, the honour of his order".


Sorry Marce. I could not resist that one! That is a great post you
just showed us. It is a direction we should all strive for in Nova
Roma and I believe one could find some of these ideas within our
virtues.

Regards,

Quintus












>>
> The Witch is worn within the soul,
> Not donned for occasion
> Or Kept in a bowl.
>
> A Witch/Nature Worshipper/Wiccan/Pagan/Esoteric lives by a code of
> ethics which is built upon the Laws of Nature. Our behavior is not
> regulated by a fear of what awaits us in the Afterlife, but a
respect
> for what awaits us in this Life. Everything, and everyone, is
> connected. What we do to one another, and to our World, we do to
> ourselves. As with all religious systems, there are certain
beliefs.
> If you are Catholic, you believe in one thing, if Jewish, you
believe
> in another. It is no different with Paganism.
> These are my basic beliefs that I share with you. Some you will
> recognize and agree with, some you might not.
>
> I've been exhausted by the amount of negative energy in the ML and
> should learn to just avoid them there.
> I hope those of you who follow similar positive beliefs can make
this
> list the standard to set and follow. I've met very few who follow
> our ideas of Religion that are false to their calling or negative
in
> any way internal or external.
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12619 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Christian, Xtian, "ExLax", or XLax.....Ex (Xactly) was Religio
Thank you M'Lady Pompeia Cornelia for your comments and thoughts and
especially the Xlax joke, I found it verry witty and Punny, lol.

So true and heartfelt sentiment taken accordingly.
The last time was in reference back to Ancient Rome when the
religious current changed over from that which it was to christianity
not meaning anything that occured here at Nova Roma.

My personal views are expressed here in a topic called personal
ethics just a few messages back.
All christian joking asside, it really isn't directed at individuals
as I have said many times. Many adherants are wonderful people and
truly practice their faith honorably - if a fault is implied, it is
with the business organizations of the church as a political tool,
definately not the people.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_cornelia"
<scriba_forum@h...> wrote:
> ---I think we truly have other things we can worry about, although
I
> appreciate some of the academic dialogue which has
> materialized...stuff I didn't know...thanks.
>
> Curiosity speaking here:
>
> With respect to Fabia's comments. I follow you. And I do not wish
> to endanger anyone's spiritual livelihood either. But I haven't
seen
> an example of this in approximately three years by a
> nonpractitioner. The last time this occurred the man was banished
by
> the Senate for what were quite obviously callous and unnecessary
> comments about the Religio, etc.
>
> Most nonpractitioners do not deface the religio. Religion
> is 'talked' about alot, and these arguments are occasional, but
> interestingly enough, upon inspection of the archives, and based on
> my experience here (unless someone can enlighten me differently)
most
> of the foohfah regarding religous controversy is started by, well
> sorry, those who are 'not' nonpractitioners.
>
> As for your comments Marcus, I am not sure what you mean by 'the
last
> time', as I have been away for a bit. I am pretty sure last
> October's antics by that poor fellow Agorius were political in
> nature, although I am not sure he himself knew that. There are a
few
> who felt they would benefit from a good round of religious
> scapegoatism. You just have to look at who egged him on last
October
> via archives and who ran for office. One person apologized to me
> after the fact, as there were issues against me, which were taken
> rather personally, unfortunately.
> To use a colloquial term, I am hotheaded when people make silly
> statements accusing others, (my recent posts) but I am not a
> vindictive bitch who wants to kill others aspirations, because I
> think I can, or hold an office, which is largely a title of
service,
> and nothing more. By the same token, as a magistrate you make a vow
> to the Gods to be consitutional and lawful, and when you are
> petitioned to investigate issues which have some legal question as
> Praetor (me) you do it...that is if you do your job like you should.
> I feel kind of bad for him personally, think the boy has issues.
> And his real name, interestingly enough, is the same as a man
killed
> fighting fires as ground zero during 9/11 (not a dig at anyone,
> please). I wonder if this kid was relating to this man, as the
name
> is not a very common one...perhaps his dad or uncle, and he was
> lashing out at the world...but this is only a wonder in my mind.
>
> Anyway, he disappeared within days of presenting his arguments and
> religious admonitions.
>
> A shame that we have to use anyone's religious beliefs as a weapon,
> and equally unfortunate that we have to tar people with the same
> brush.
>
> And these, dear Marcus, are issues that concern me as an individual
> far more than the use of Christian, Xtian...Merry Xmas, any more
than
> we should worry about ExLax, XLax......
>
> Xactly!
> Pompeia :)
>
>
> SNIP
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12620 From: Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Personal ethics - was Tha Back Alley
LMAO
Quintus!
I appreciate the humor as always.
Let's face it, you cant Talk (Torq) him (em) outta (ada) nothing!



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
> Salve Marce,
>
> Come to visit me in my province and deep dark basement and I'll
teach
> ye the way of the faith. It is a hard but narrow and straight road
to
> heaven or hell but you "will" prevail my friend!
>
> In the name of our Lord,
>
> Quintus de Torquemada
>
> "the hammer of heretics, the light of Heaven, the saviour of his
> country, the honour of his order".
>
>
> Sorry Marce. I could not resist that one! That is a great post you
> just showed us. It is a direction we should all strive for in Nova
> Roma and I believe one could find some of these ideas within our
> virtues.
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >>
> > The Witch is worn within the soul,
> > Not donned for occasion
> > Or Kept in a bowl.
> >
> > A Witch/Nature Worshipper/Wiccan/Pagan/Esoteric lives by a code
of
> > ethics which is built upon the Laws of Nature. Our behavior is
not
> > regulated by a fear of what awaits us in the Afterlife, but a
> respect
> > for what awaits us in this Life. Everything, and everyone, is
> > connected. What we do to one another, and to our World, we do to
> > ourselves. As with all religious systems, there are certain
> beliefs.
> > If you are Catholic, you believe in one thing, if Jewish, you
> believe
> > in another. It is no different with Paganism.
> > These are my basic beliefs that I share with you. Some you will
> > recognize and agree with, some you might not.
> >
> > I've been exhausted by the amount of negative energy in the ML
and
> > should learn to just avoid them there.
> > I hope those of you who follow similar positive beliefs can make
> this
> > list the standard to set and follow. I've met very few who follow
> > our ideas of Religion that are false to their calling or negative
> in
> > any way internal or external.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12621 From: zak29577 Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Results of Senate Vote
Salve omnes,

While I appreciate having the results of the Senate voting being
published by our Triblunus Plebis (and agree with all results), I am
left wondering about the entry (see below) stating that Senator
Lucius Cornelius Sulla's vote was given by proxy.

I would like to know who delivered the venerable Senator's vote.

Vale,

Gaius Ursus Casca
Roman Citizen

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Diana Moravia Aventina"
<diana@p...> wrote:
> Tribunus Plebis Diana Moravia Aventina Quiritibus SPD
>
> Senate Voting Results published on July 3 2756.
>
> The Senate has finished its latest session and the votes have been
tallied
> as follows.
>
<snip>
>
> The following 17 Senators cast votes in time. They are referred to
below by
> their initials, and are listed in alphabetical order by nomen:
>
<another snip>
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla (LCS) (proxy vote)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12622 From: Christine Schofield Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Chariot Racing
Salve Gai Corneli Ahenobarbe,

Some of the photos aren't too bad.

Would you like me to send you a sample?

Vale

Gaia Flavia Aureliana

-----Original Message-----
From: Gaius Cornelius Ahenobarbus [mailto:ahenobarbus@...]
Sent: 27 June 2003 19:32
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Chariot Racing


Gaia Flavia, if you could please please please take some photos, we'd
forever be in your debt...

> Salve Omnes;
> one of the cives in the NR course, Gaia Flavia of Britannica,tells
>that there will be chariot racing at the racetrack in Chester, with
>full Roman dress.

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
HYPERLINK
"http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail"http://join.msn.com/?page=f
eatures/junkmail



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT
HYPERLINK
"http://rd.yahoo.com/M=244522.3313099.4604523.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705
313712:HM/A=1595054/R=0/SIG=124km4b11/*http://ashnin.com/clk/muryutaitak
enattogyo?YH=3313099&yhad=1595054"Click Here!
HYPERLINK
"http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=244522.3313099.4604523.1261774/D=egrou
pmail/S=:HM/A=1595054/rand=199538337"

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the HYPERLINK
"http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/"Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.491 / Virus Database: 290 - Release Date: 18/06/2003



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.495 / Virus Database: 294 - Release Date: 30/06/2003



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12623 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Results of Senate Vote
Ave Gaius Ursus et Omnes,

I gave my proxy vote in the Senate to Senator Lucius Sicinus Drusus.

Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
----- Original Message -----
From: zak29577
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:58 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Results of Senate Vote


Salve omnes,

While I appreciate having the results of the Senate voting being
published by our Triblunus Plebis (and agree with all results), I am
left wondering about the entry (see below) stating that Senator
Lucius Cornelius Sulla's vote was given by proxy.

I would like to know who delivered the venerable Senator's vote.

Vale,

Gaius Ursus Casca
Roman Citizen

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Diana Moravia Aventina"
<diana@p...> wrote:
> Tribunus Plebis Diana Moravia Aventina Quiritibus SPD
>
> Senate Voting Results published on July 3 2756.
>
> The Senate has finished its latest session and the votes have been
tallied
> as follows.
>
<snip>
>
> The following 17 Senators cast votes in time. They are referred to
below by
> their initials, and are listed in alphabetical order by nomen:
>
<another snip>
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla (LCS) (proxy vote)



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12624 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Christian, Xtian, "ExLax", or XLax.....Ex (Xactly) was Religio
---


Trying to be funny, I guess, which went over like a lead balloon.
Those who are not a part of the non practitioners,
meaning 'practitioner' or...'those whose religious affiliation is the
Religio.

Po
In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@m...>
wrote:
> Salve Pompeia you sid in part
>
>
> "those who are 'not' nonpractitioners." double negative ?
>
>
> Does this mean those who DO practice the Religio Romanum or does it
mean those who DO NOT practice the RR" are the ones who always start
the Religious arguments ?
>
>
> Pax
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: pompeia_cornelia
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:34 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Christian, Xtian, "ExLax", or
XLax.....Ex (Xactly) was Religio Poll
>
>
> ---I think we truly have other things we can worry about,
although I
> appreciate some of the academic dialogue which has
> materialized...stuff I didn't know...thanks.
>
> Curiosity speaking here:
>
> With respect to Fabia's comments. I follow you. And I do not
wish
> to endanger anyone's spiritual livelihood either. But I haven't
seen
> an example of this in approximately three years by a
> nonpractitioner. The last time this occurred the man was
banished by
> the Senate for what were quite obviously callous and unnecessary
> comments about the Religio, etc.
>
> Most nonpractitioners do not deface the religio. Religion
> is 'talked' about alot, and these arguments are occasional, but
> interestingly enough, upon inspection of the archives, and based
on
> my experience here (unless someone can enlighten me differently)
most
> of the foohfah regarding religous controversy is started by, well
> sorry, those who are 'not' nonpractitioners.
>
> As for your comments Marcus, I am not sure what you mean by 'the
last
> time', as I have been away for a bit. I am pretty sure last
> October's antics by that poor fellow Agorius were political in
> nature, although I am not sure he himself knew that. There are a
few
> who felt they would benefit from a good round of religious
> scapegoatism. You just have to look at who egged him on last
October
> via archives and who ran for office. One person apologized to me
> after the fact, as there were issues against me, which were taken
> rather personally, unfortunately.
> To use a colloquial term, I am hotheaded when people make silly
> statements accusing others, (my recent posts) but I am not a
> vindictive bitch who wants to kill others aspirations, because I
> think I can, or hold an office, which is largely a title of
service,
> and nothing more. By the same token, as a magistrate you make a
vow
> to the Gods to be consitutional and lawful, and when you are
> petitioned to investigate issues which have some legal question
as
> Praetor (me) you do it...that is if you do your job like you
should.
> I feel kind of bad for him personally, think the boy has
issues.
> And his real name, interestingly enough, is the same as a man
killed
> fighting fires as ground zero during 9/11 (not a dig at anyone,
> please). I wonder if this kid was relating to this man, as the
name
> is not a very common one...perhaps his dad or uncle, and he was
> lashing out at the world...but this is only a wonder in my mind.
>
> Anyway, he disappeared within days of presenting his arguments
and
> religious admonitions.
>
> A shame that we have to use anyone's religious beliefs as a
weapon,
> and equally unfortunate that we have to tar people with the same
> brush.
>
> And these, dear Marcus, are issues that concern me as an
individual
> far more than the use of Christian, Xtian...Merry Xmas, any more
than
> we should worry about ExLax, XLax......
>
> Xactly!
> Pompeia :)
>
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius"
> <mballetta@h...> wrote:
> > Salvete everyone.
> > I wonder if this is how it happened the last time?
> > First with dissagreement over words and phrases then by people
> being
> > offended by talk, words and labels.
> > Then to taking offense in an "offensive as opposed to
defensive"
> way.
> > Then the torture killing and conversion in the name of these
> beliefs?
> > Who knows where it all began but I wish we did so we could
prevent
> > similar mistakes now.
> > Valete all.
> >
> > SNIP
> > > > My friend Tiberius is very honorable and a true Roman with
good
> > ideas
> > > > who works very hard for us. I can't read his mind but if he
got
> > the
> > > > slightest inkling that a poll like this could evolve into
> > something
> > > > ugly he would not hesitate to pull it.
> > > >
> > > > When we all signed up for NR we knew that the Religio
Romano is
> > the
> > > > state religion and must be respected and tolerated;
especially
> by
> > > > magistrates. The religio in turn, also tolerates our single-
god
> > > > beliefs and membership in this community. Now suppose the
pole
> at
> > > > this date and time showed 95% of us were not practitioners
of
> the
> > > > Religio Romano, then I could see the stats being used as a
> weapon
> > to
> > > > alter the status of the religio somewhere down the line in
> future.
> > > > This of course could tear NR to pieces and finish it for
good.
> > Also
> > > > we must appreciate that this whole institution was founded
an
> > > > organized mostly by the people who wished to practice and
make
> > > > Religio Romano as one of the main pillars. For these
reasons I
> > think
> > > > some things are better left unsaid. I confess, I got talked
into
> > > > setting up a poll here last year asking people on their
> thoughts
> > of
> > > > the afterlife and deities but a number of people wrote in
to
> > request
> > > > a cancellation of the poll; I only got 12 replies which I
> > regarded as
> > > > a polite way of telling me to piss off.
> > > >
> > > > On a more positive note maybe some other Muslim members may
see
> > these
> > > > 2 postings and contact you in private or on the ML. Please
let
> us
> > > > know what transpires.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Quintus
> > >
> > > Salve,
> > > Oh, I perfectly understand, ans would not want anything to
happen
> > that would
> > > endanger Nova Roma in that way. I was looking at it from more
of
> a
> > curiosity
> > > stand point, things like that interest me. And if ther are
other
> > Muslims on
> > > this list, I would really like to meet them.
> > > Vale,
> > > Claudia Fabia Calpurnia
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12625 From: zak29577 Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Results of Senate Vote
Salve omnes,

While I appreciate having the results of the Senate voting being
published by our Triblunus Plebis (and agree with all results), I am
left wondering about the entry (see below) stating that Senator
Lucius Cornelius Sulla's vote was given by proxy.

I would like to know who delivered the venerable Senator's vote.

Vale,

Gaius Ursus Casca
Roman Citizen

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Diana Moravia Aventina"
<diana@p...> wrote:
> Tribunus Plebis Diana Moravia Aventina Quiritibus SPD
>
> Senate Voting Results published on July 3 2756.
>
> The Senate has finished its latest session and the votes have been
tallied
> as follows.
>
<snip>
>
> The following 17 Senators cast votes in time. They are referred to
below by
> their initials, and are listed in alphabetical order by nomen:
>
<another snip>
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla (LCS) (proxy vote)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12626 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Results of Senate Vote
---

"Venerable" Senator?

Lol..never heard that coined phrase before.

It is common place to ask someone to vote for you, that you
entrust, ...please vote yes for me as I am tied up an unable to.
This is acceptable Senatorial protocol.

It is not a case of the other Senator making up the mind of
the 'venerable' Senator, it is simply the formality of the entrusted
Senator voting as per the wishes of the venerable senator,.

I hope you don't mind my chuckle...that is cute.

Pompeia

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@e...>
wrote:
> Ave Gaius Ursus et Omnes,
>
> I gave my proxy vote in the Senate to Senator Lucius Sicinus Drusus.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: zak29577
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:58 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Results of Senate Vote
>
>
> Salve omnes,
>
> While I appreciate having the results of the Senate voting being
> published by our Triblunus Plebis (and agree with all results), I
am
> left wondering about the entry (see below) stating that Senator
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla's vote was given by proxy.
>
> I would like to know who delivered the venerable Senator's vote.
>
> Vale,
>
> Gaius Ursus Casca
> Roman Citizen
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Diana Moravia Aventina"
> <diana@p...> wrote:
> > Tribunus Plebis Diana Moravia Aventina Quiritibus SPD
> >
> > Senate Voting Results published on July 3 2756.
> >
> > The Senate has finished its latest session and the votes have
been
> tallied
> > as follows.
> >
> <snip>
> >
> > The following 17 Senators cast votes in time. They are referred
to
> below by
> > their initials, and are listed in alphabetical order by nomen:
> >
> <another snip>
> >
> > Lucius Cornelius Sulla (LCS) (proxy vote)
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12627 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Let us Not....
...wallow about the cost of sausages in Austria

...the impact of taxes on packs of Exlax on the greenback


...perseverate on whether or not Bill Gates uses Preparation H

...get in a snit that our name was omitted from the obituaries..the
ticket to missing our shift

..........Pompeia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12628 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Christian, Xtian, "ExLax", or XLax.....Ex (Xactly) was Religio
---Your welcome:

My humour is rather dry and is not always captured by some people who
read anything I write. I'm glad it make sense to a few
people...grin....

for the benefit of Tiberius (Stephen Gallagher)

being a 'non' nonpractioner, means you are "not" a member of people
whose beliefs differ from the religio.....a non nonpractioner is also
someone who doesn't necessary 'practice' the religio, except to the
extent of giving it lip service. Kind of like people who go to
church for weddings and funerals only.....

that sort of thing ....my warped humour.

Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Marcus Ambrosius Belisarius"
<mballetta@h...> wrote:
> Thank you M'Lady Pompeia Cornelia for your comments and thoughts
and
> especially the Xlax joke, I found it verry witty and Punny, lol.
>
> So true and heartfelt sentiment taken accordingly.
> The last time was in reference back to Ancient Rome when the
> religious current changed over from that which it was to
christianity
> not meaning anything that occured here at Nova Roma.
>
> My personal views are expressed here in a topic called personal
> ethics just a few messages back.
> All christian joking asside, it really isn't directed at
individuals
> as I have said many times. Many adherants are wonderful people and
> truly practice their faith honorably - if a fault is implied, it is
> with the business organizations of the church as a political tool,
> definately not the people.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_cornelia"
> <scriba_forum@h...> wrote:
> > ---I think we truly have other things we can worry about,
although
> I
> > appreciate some of the academic dialogue which has
> > materialized...stuff I didn't know...thanks.
> >
> > Curiosity speaking here:
> >
> > With respect to Fabia's comments. I follow you. And I do not
wish
> > to endanger anyone's spiritual livelihood either. But I haven't
> seen
> > an example of this in approximately three years by a
> > nonpractitioner. The last time this occurred the man was
banished
> by
> > the Senate for what were quite obviously callous and unnecessary
> > comments about the Religio, etc.
> >
> > Most nonpractitioners do not deface the religio. Religion
> > is 'talked' about alot, and these arguments are occasional, but
> > interestingly enough, upon inspection of the archives, and based
on
> > my experience here (unless someone can enlighten me differently)
> most
> > of the foohfah regarding religous controversy is started by, well
> > sorry, those who are 'not' nonpractitioners.
> >
> > As for your comments Marcus, I am not sure what you mean by 'the
> last
> > time', as I have been away for a bit. I am pretty sure last
> > October's antics by that poor fellow Agorius were political in
> > nature, although I am not sure he himself knew that. There are a
> few
> > who felt they would benefit from a good round of religious
> > scapegoatism. You just have to look at who egged him on last
> October
> > via archives and who ran for office. One person apologized to me
> > after the fact, as there were issues against me, which were taken
> > rather personally, unfortunately.
> > To use a colloquial term, I am hotheaded when people make silly
> > statements accusing others, (my recent posts) but I am not a
> > vindictive bitch who wants to kill others aspirations, because I
> > think I can, or hold an office, which is largely a title of
> service,
> > and nothing more. By the same token, as a magistrate you make a
vow
> > to the Gods to be consitutional and lawful, and when you are
> > petitioned to investigate issues which have some legal question
as
> > Praetor (me) you do it...that is if you do your job like you
should.
> > I feel kind of bad for him personally, think the boy has
issues.
> > And his real name, interestingly enough, is the same as a man
> killed
> > fighting fires as ground zero during 9/11 (not a dig at anyone,
> > please). I wonder if this kid was relating to this man, as the
> name
> > is not a very common one...perhaps his dad or uncle, and he was
> > lashing out at the world...but this is only a wonder in my mind.
> >
> > Anyway, he disappeared within days of presenting his arguments
and
> > religious admonitions.
> >
> > A shame that we have to use anyone's religious beliefs as a
weapon,
> > and equally unfortunate that we have to tar people with the same
> > brush.
> >
> > And these, dear Marcus, are issues that concern me as an
individual
> > far more than the use of Christian, Xtian...Merry Xmas, any more
> than
> > we should worry about ExLax, XLax......
> >
> > Xactly!
> > Pompeia :)
> >
> >
> > SNIP
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12629 From: zak29577 Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Results of Senate Vote
I have no idea why this message was posted twice, and apolgize for
it.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12630 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
Cn. Salix Astur Quiritibus S.P.D.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Diana Moravia Aventina"
<diana@p...> wrote:
> Salve Gnaeus Salix Astur,
> Salve D Iunius Palladius,
> Salve C Fabius Quintilianus,
>
> I see that none of you have taken the time out to reply to me. The
> Praetores monitor this list everyday, no? So now a direct question
> to our Praetores:
> Are C Minucius Scaevola's emails within list guidelines or not?
> Please state your opinion on this list one way or the other.

Your first petition was posted to this list at Thu Jul 3, 2003, 11:58
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/12564
Your second petition was posted at Thu Jul 3, 2003, 22:14
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/12612

Between your first and your second petition, less than twelve hours
have passed. I certainly did not have time to see the first before
the second one was posted. I wonder if you are not being slightly
impatient.

> I have commented twice publicly that I find C Minucius Scaevola's
> emails verbally abusive and intimidating. Why don't any of you
> respond? Why is my only response from C Minucius, this time saying
> that I am 'taking care of my buddies" and sarcastically implying
> that I am dishonest ? So besides having to sit by and watch C
> Minucius Scaevola having a free reign to insult many citizens, now
> I have to sit back as he insults me as a Tribune? I am not
> laughing anymore gentlemen: Put everyone on moderation who cannot
> discuss things in a manner that leaves out the nasty insults.

<<snipped>>

Many different people (including C. Minucius Scaevola) have insulted
other people on the last few days. You have now explicitly petitioned
an action from the praetores' part (no, Diana; a simple comment is
not enough; not even two of them) with regards to C. Minucius
Scaevola's insults.

It is true that C. Minucius Scaevola's latest comments cross the line
of what we consider acceptable. If my collega does not disagree, I
will place C. Minucius Scaevola under moderation through a praetorial
edictum until he presents his excuses to the praetores' satisfaction
or until one month has passed, whatever happens first.

Of course, should anyone else have any other petition from the
praetores, we will be happy to hear it.

CN·SALIX·ASTVR·T·F·A·NEP·TRIB·OVF
PRAETOR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12631 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Censors and Senators
Salvete omnes,

I was studying the Political offices of the Roman Empire from my
posting yesterday. It mentions on page 3 that the senators, though
appointed for life could actually be expelled by the Censors. Does
this situation apply to NR as well under extreme circumstances?

Vale,

Quintus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12632 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Censors and Senators
Salve Quinte Lani,

> I was studying the Political offices of the Roman Empire from my
> posting yesterday. It mentions on page 3 that the senators, though
> appointed for life could actually be expelled by the Censors. Does
> this situation apply to NR as well under extreme circumstances?

Yes, though not all circumstances have been explicitly defined.

# They shall have the following honors, powers, and obligations:
[...]
# d. To maintain the album senatorium (list of Senators), including the
# power to add and remove names on that list according to
# qualifications set by law;

Removal for reasons of inactivity or disappearance was enabled through
a law passed last year, and exercised early this year.

The Censores also have the power to issue notae:

# To safeguard the public morality and honor through the collegial
# administering of nota;
# 2. A nota against a member of the Senate is sufficient to remove that
# individual from the Senate until such time as it is removed.

Gross violations of public morality can therefore result in expulsion.

Practically speaking, it would not be likely to succeed unless there
was clear evidence of criminal misconduct; in any other case, there
would be a fierce debate in the Senate and appeals to the Tribunes to
intercede.

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
http://www.graveyards.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12633 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Censors and Senators
Salve Marce,

Thank you very much for the details.

Respectfully,

Quintus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Marcus Octavius Germanicus
<hucke@c...> wrote:
>
> Salve Quinte Lani,
>
> > I was studying the Political offices of the Roman Empire from my
> > posting yesterday. It mentions on page 3 that the senators, though
> > appointed for life could actually be expelled by the Censors. Does
> > this situation apply to NR as well under extreme circumstances?
>
> Yes, though not all circumstances have been explicitly defined.
>
> # They shall have the following honors, powers, and obligations:
> [...]
> # d. To maintain the album senatorium (list of Senators), including
the
> # power to add and remove names on that list according to
> # qualifications set by law;
>
> Removal for reasons of inactivity or disappearance was enabled
through
> a law passed last year, and exercised early this year.
>
> The Censores also have the power to issue notae:
>
> # To safeguard the public morality and honor through the collegial
> # administering of nota;
> # 2. A nota against a member of the Senate is sufficient to
remove that
> # individual from the Senate until such time as it is removed.
>
> Gross violations of public morality can therefore result in
expulsion.
>
> Practically speaking, it would not be likely to succeed unless there
> was clear evidence of criminal misconduct; in any other case, there
> would be a fierce debate in the Senate and appeals to the Tribunes
to
> intercede.
>
> Vale, Octavius.
>
> --
> Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
> http://www.graveyards.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12634 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
Salve Marine,

> Consular Sulla,
>
> Are you suggesting that the Senior Consul or any of his cohors would
> abuse their authority in order to influence the judgement of the
> Praetors or the Censors? Or that either the Praetors or the Censors
> would give special treatment to anyone based on their membership
> in said cohors?

That's certainly what it sounded like to me.

He fails to notice that my colleague and I did not issue a nota directed
at the person I have recently been fighting with.

If this was some sort of attempt to accuse us of favoritism, it's a
rather pathetic one, as there is no inconsistency.

*Nothing* on this list recently, from anyone - including my enemies -
is deserving of a Nota.

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
http://www.graveyards.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12635 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
Gnaeus Salix Astur <salixastur@...> writes:

[...]

> Many different people (including C. Minucius Scaevola) have insulted
> other people on the last few days.

[...]

> Of course, should anyone else have any other petition from the
> praetores, we will be happy to hear it.

Salve Gnaeus Salix,

I ask, with some hesitation since I respect and admire each of
those I'm about to name, that the Praetors review the recent posts
of Lucius Sicinius Drusus, Marcus Octavius Germanicus, and Lucius
Cornelius Sulla Felix for possible violations of the mainlist
guidelines. There may be others who have pushed the boundaries
as well, but those three worthy gentlemen, along with Caius
Minucius Scaevola whose case has already been addressed, have been
the most obvious to me.

Furthermore, I would ask that you consider some of your own posts
in your exchange with Lucius Sicinius Drusus. I don't think you
went over the line in any of them, but it seemed to me that perhaps
your choice of response was at times provoking. While I'm sure that
you honestly meant everything you said, perhaps a statement of
regret to the populace in general would not be amis?

Finally, I call to your and your colleague's attention the post by
Aulus Apollonius Cordus, in which Cordus took issue with your colleague
for making an implicit charge of treasonable actions on the part of
certain unspecified members of the Senior Consul's cohors. I would
ask that your colleague in the Praetorship answer Cordus' comments
and apologise for his intemprate statements.

We who serve, in the magistracies and in the Senate, should be setting
a better example.

Sincerely,

-- Gn. Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12636 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
Salvete Praetores Cn. Salix et Deci Iuni,

> It is true that C. Minucius Scaevola's latest comments cross the line
> of what we consider acceptable. If my collega does not disagree, I
> will place C. Minucius Scaevola under moderation through a praetorial
> edictum until he presents his excuses to the praetores' satisfaction
> or until one month has passed, whatever happens first.

As you are aware, C. Minucius Scaevola departed for a one-week vacation
earlier today and is without internet access.

Unfortunately, he has now been spoken against _in absentia_, and has
no way to counter this accusation.

There will be no messages on this list from Scaevola for a week. Coming
as that does after a statement that would be moderated, an uninformed
observer might come to the erroneous conclusion that whatever appeals
he has made to the praetores, censores, or consuls have been rejected
and that he is being punished.

Is it just to pronounce judgement when there has been no opportunity
to present a defence? He announced his vacation *before* either praetor
had posted on the subject of his opponents' request to silence him.
To announce now that he is to be moderated, before there has been any
chance for C. Minucius to counter the accusations, will serve to
prejudice the minds of observers against him.

To all Citizens, please be aware that Scaevola's silence on this list
for the next week has nothing whatsoever to do with moderation or
punishment of any sort. He has been found guilty of nothing. He is
merely on vacation, as evidenced by his message of 11:33 EDT today.

Note, also, that there has been no edict issued by the praetores
against C. Minucius, and that the Praetors' statement above was
merely indicative of a possible future course of action.

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
http://www.graveyards.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12637 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
Salvete,

1.) After Praetor Salix Astur's attempts to mislead
the people regarding my record I have no desire for
ANY communication from him prior to an apology. I
Request that any communication with me regarding this
matter be through Praetor Palladius Invictus.

2.) I Acknowledge that I grew angry and violated the
list guidelines. I will accept the same penality given
to Caius Minucius Scaevola without appeal if that is
the decession of the Praetors.

--- Bill Gawne <gawne@...> wrote:
> Gnaeus Salix Astur <salixastur@...> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > Many different people (including C. Minucius
> Scaevola) have insulted
> > other people on the last few days.
>
> [...]
>
> > Of course, should anyone else have any other
> petition from the
> > praetores, we will be happy to hear it.
>
> Salve Gnaeus Salix,
>
> I ask, with some hesitation since I respect and
> admire each of
> those I'm about to name, that the Praetors review
> the recent posts
> of Lucius Sicinius Drusus, Marcus Octavius
> Germanicus, and Lucius
> Cornelius Sulla Felix for possible violations of the
> mainlist
> guidelines. There may be others who have pushed the
> boundaries
> as well, but those three worthy gentlemen, along
> with Caius
> Minucius Scaevola whose case has already been
> addressed, have been
> the most obvious to me.
>
> Furthermore, I would ask that you consider some of
> your own posts
> in your exchange with Lucius Sicinius Drusus. I
> don't think you
> went over the line in any of them, but it seemed to
> me that perhaps
> your choice of response was at times provoking.
> While I'm sure that
> you honestly meant everything you said, perhaps a
> statement of
> regret to the populace in general would not be amis?
>
> Finally, I call to your and your colleague's
> attention the post by
> Aulus Apollonius Cordus, in which Cordus took issue
> with your colleague
> for making an implicit charge of treasonable actions
> on the part of
> certain unspecified members of the Senior Consul's
> cohors. I would
> ask that your colleague in the Praetorship answer
> Cordus' comments
> and apologise for his intemprate statements.
>
> We who serve, in the magistracies and in the Senate,
> should be setting
> a better example.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> -- Gn. Equitius Marinus
>


=====
L. Sicinius Drusus

Roman Citizen

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12638 From: M Flavius Aurelius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Results of Senate Vote
Pompeia Cornelia

Is it only worth a chuckle because it is Sulla? Or the concept of Senators being venerable amuses you in general?

M Flavius Aurelius
----- Original Message -----
From: pompeia_cornelia
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 8:18 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Results of Senate Vote


---

"Venerable" Senator?

Lol..never heard that coined phrase before.

It is common place to ask someone to vote for you, that you
entrust, ...please vote yes for me as I am tied up an unable to.
This is acceptable Senatorial protocol.

It is not a case of the other Senator making up the mind of
the 'venerable' Senator, it is simply the formality of the entrusted
Senator voting as per the wishes of the venerable senator,.

I hope you don't mind my chuckle...that is cute.

Pompeia

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@e...>
wrote:
> Ave Gaius Ursus et Omnes,
>
> I gave my proxy vote in the Senate to Senator Lucius Sicinus Drusus.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: zak29577
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:58 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Results of Senate Vote
>
>
> Salve omnes,
>
> While I appreciate having the results of the Senate voting being
> published by our Triblunus Plebis (and agree with all results), I
am
> left wondering about the entry (see below) stating that Senator
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla's vote was given by proxy.
>
> I would like to know who delivered the venerable Senator's vote.
>
> Vale,
>
> Gaius Ursus Casca
> Roman Citizen
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Diana Moravia Aventina"
> <diana@p...> wrote:
> > Tribunus Plebis Diana Moravia Aventina Quiritibus SPD
> >
> > Senate Voting Results published on July 3 2756.
> >
> > The Senate has finished its latest session and the votes have
been
> tallied
> > as follows.
> >
> <snip>
> >
> > The following 17 Senators cast votes in time. They are referred
to
> below by
> > their initials, and are listed in alphabetical order by nomen:
> >
> <another snip>
> >
> > Lucius Cornelius Sulla (LCS) (proxy vote)
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12639 From: Tiberius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Senate Vote
Salvete Milites et Cives
My thanks for your congrats for my Legion, I swear to be worthy of this
honour. The Legion has a busy summer still ahead of us with 2-3 shows to do
yet and our annual feast for Armilustrium which we are looking for a Priest
to perform the rituals.

Valete
K.M. Tiberius
Legatus Legio XXI Rapax
http://www.leg-xxi.org
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12640 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
"L. Sicinius Drusus" <lsicinius@...> writes:

> 2.) I Acknowledge that I grew angry and violated the
> list guidelines. I will accept the same penality given
> to Caius Minucius Scaevola without appeal if that is
> the decession of the Praetors.

That was handsomly done, Lucius Sicinius. Thank you for
taking responsibility for your actions in this. I applaud
your willingness to admit error. You set a good example
for us all by this statement.

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12641 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: The Gauntlet
Salvete Quirites,

There has been a disturbing trend on this list of
late. Any crictism of policies favored by the Senior
Consul's staff is met by a barrage of posts from the
Consular Cohorts and others closely allied with the
Senior Consul.

Since I'm not privy to the inner workings of the
Consul's staff I have no idea if this is due to a
planned effort or if it's the result of an overly
zealous staff. Either way the result is the same.
Dozens of posts in what some have called a "tag team"
effort from the Consular staff.

If the person dosen't quickly back down it quickly
grows to hundreds of posts in an apparant effort to
wear them down. I'm not easily intimidated, so this
had little effect on me other than having to make the
same replies over and over, but this isn't true of
everyone. After facing this gauntlet there are few who
would wish to do so a second time.

Either through plan, or through lack of control, the
actions of the Senior Consul's staff are having a
chilling effect on speech in this forum.


=====
L. Sicinius Drusus

Roman Citizen

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12642 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
--- Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
> "L. Sicinius Drusus" <lsicinius@...> writes:
>
> > 2.) I Acknowledge that I grew angry and violated
> the
> > list guidelines. I will accept the same penality
> given
> > to Caius Minucius Scaevola without appeal if that
> is
> > the decession of the Praetors.
>
> That was handsomly done, Lucius Sicinius. Thank you
> for
> taking responsibility for your actions in this. I
> applaud
> your willingness to admit error. You set a good
> example
> for us all by this statement.
>
> -- Marinus
>
Sir,
Accepting Personal responsibility for your actions is
the core of my moral philosphy. I Make no excuses for
my conduct and am willing to accept the consequances
of my actions.


=====
L. Sicinius Drusus

Roman Citizen

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12643 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: The Gauntlet
Salve Senator Sicini,

> There has been a disturbing trend on this list of
> late. Any crictism of policies favored by the Senior
> Consul's staff is met by a barrage of posts from the
> Consular Cohorts and others closely allied with the
> Senior Consul.

Would it not also be correct to be said that any action or proposal
of the Senior Consul or his allies is met with a barrage of posts
from a small group of citizens who habitually oppose him?

The first such event this year was his appointment of his large
staff - which was actually the subject of a petition for intercessio!
Already by January 5th, when no proposals for any significant changes
had been advanced, there was already an organized effort underway
to neutralize the current administration.

> Since I'm not privy to the inner workings of the
> Consul's staff I have no idea if this is due to a
> planned effort or if it's the result of an overly
> zealous staff. Either way the result is the same.
> Dozens of posts in what some have called a "tag team"
> effort from the Consular staff.

What of that "tag team" of L. Sicinius Drusus, Q. Fabius Maximus,
L. Cornelius Sulla, and occasionally a few others? Do these
people not habitually oppose every action of the Consuls, particularly
the Senior Consul?

You attack the Consul and his allies for the very same behaviour you
engage in yourself.

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
http://www.graveyards.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12644 From: M Flavius Aurelius Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: List Administration
Setting a citizen's posts to moderated requires that the duty of approval or non-approval of messages falls to the moderators of the list. But if a citizen was set to moderate for administrative reasons, where would the moderators draw the line about what was an approved message and what was not? And if the citizen in question is on moderate state for "punishment", would that change what the list administrators approve or censor?

This puts a lot of responsibility on the list administrators for deciding what is, and is not, approved and subsequently sent to the main list. Have they been given guidelines beyond the rather vague outline of what is and is not acceptable? For example, what is a message that has been deleted, rather than approved?

In other guises, I administer several lists on Yahoo. And the issue of moderation is always contentious. On principle, I do not like deleting messages from any subscriber, unless they are spam about viagra etc. But even that is censorship, and involves judgments.

Just wondering where the lines are drawn......

M Flavius Aurelius
m.flavius.aurelius@...
Scribe
Australia Province


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12645 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Senate Vote
Salve K. M. Tiberius

and congratulations on the honor that the Senate has bestowed on the Honorable Legio XXI Rapax

May the god/s follow your standard.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


----- Original Message -----
From: Tiberius
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 9:44 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Senate Vote


Salvete Milites et Cives
My thanks for your congrats for my Legion, I swear to be worthy of this
honour. The Legion has a busy summer still ahead of us with 2-3 shows to do
yet and our annual feast for Armilustrium which we are looking for a Priest
to perform the rituals.

Valete
K.M. Tiberius
Legatus Legio XXI Rapax
http://www.leg-xxi.org




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12646 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: The Gauntlet
"L. Sicinius Drusus" <lsicinius@...> writes:

> There has been a disturbing trend on this list of
> late. Any crictism of policies favored by the Senior
> Consul's staff is met by a barrage of posts from the
> Consular Cohorts and others closely allied with the
> Senior Consul.

Well, we do all work in concert to shape policies
and proposals. I think it's reasonable that if people
have questions we answer them. Likewise I think we all
have a sense of being strongly invested in the work we
do, and if that work is criticised I think it's normal
for the people who did the work to answer.

> Since I'm not privy to the inner workings of the
> Consul's staff I have no idea if this is due to a
> planned effort

I give you my word, it is *not* planned. I would take
strong offense if such planning were ever suggested or
discussed in the cohors mailing lists.

> or if it's the result of an overly zealous staff.

I'd say hard working and dedicated. But reasonable persons
can differ on these things.

> Either way the result is the same.
> Dozens of posts in what some have called a "tag team"
> effort from the Consular staff.

Really now Drusus, from where I sit it seems very much
that the efforts of you, and Quintus Fabius Maximus, and
several others who occassionally chime in to say supportive
things about what you've posted look as much like a tag
team as anything my colleagues in the consular cohort may
do.

I know you have been open about your membership in the
"boni" group, and I suppose you folks discuss things and
come up with a plan to address issues among yourselves.
That's fine by me, and I applaud you for being open and
forthright about it. But what I'm saying is that to me
it appears you're collectively as guilty of tag team
tactics as anyone might be.

> If the person dosen't quickly back down it quickly
> grows to hundreds of posts in an apparant effort to
> wear them down.

From my perspective, those posts are replies to other
replies. It's reasonable to expect that people will
answer things directed at them.

> I'm not easily intimidated, so this
> had little effect on me other than having to make the
> same replies over and over,

Yes, I'd noticed.

> but this isn't true of
> everyone. After facing this gauntlet there are few who
> would wish to do so a second time.

And yet, from my perspective it's as much of a gauntlet for
anybody on the consul's staff. We can rely on a small but
vocal group of people to take issue with everything we work
to develop. While I accept that this kind of thing comes with
the territory, I don't accept that we ought to muzzle ourselves.

> Either through plan, or through lack of control, the
> actions of the Senior Consul's staff are having a
> chilling effect on speech in this forum.

What kind of control would you suggest? I will not tell the
people who work under me in the Senior Consul's cohort that
they may not speak their minds. It would not only be wrong,
it would be a violation of their constitutionally guaranteed
rights as citizens of Nova Roma. Were I to attempt such a
thing I'd expect Caeso Fabius would dismiss me on the spot.

I can, and I do, lead by example. I make an effort to be courteous
in my posts, especially when matters become contentious. I try
to keep my answers short, dispassionate, and to the point. But I
can not compell anyone else to follow my lead in this.

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12647 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: The Gauntlet
Senator,
Others may have have made a lot of comments on the
size of the staff. I Only recall making one after the
contreversy arose I stated that I wasn't surprised
that the Consul appointed a large staff after
observing how he ran his provincia, and that a large
staff seemed to be no more than his leadership style.

I thought and still think that the change in the
Census law was a bad idea. I Have never had a high
opinion of efforts to inflate the number of members of
this organization y whatever name, and have commented
on this many times over the past two years.

In the latest case where I spoke out I didn't even
urge that his election plan be defeated, only that it
or any other be tested before being adopted, and after
Giaus Iulius offered hs ideas I made the same comment
on them.

Thus far I have supported the Consul in one case,
continued a long standing postion contrary to him in a
second case, and urged caution in the last case. That
is hardly opposing everything .

--- Marcus Octavius Germanicus <hucke@...>
wrote:
> Salve Senator Sicini,
>
> > There has been a disturbing trend on this list of
> > late. Any crictism of policies favored by the
> Senior
> > Consul's staff is met by a barrage of posts from
> the
> > Consular Cohorts and others closely allied with
> the
> > Senior Consul.
>
> Would it not also be correct to be said that any
> action or proposal
> of the Senior Consul or his allies is met with a
> barrage of posts
> from a small group of citizens who habitually oppose
> him?
>
> The first such event this year was his appointment
> of his large
> staff - which was actually the subject of a petition
> for intercessio!
> Already by January 5th, when no proposals for any
> significant changes
> had been advanced, there was already an organized
> effort underway
> to neutralize the current administration.
>
> > Since I'm not privy to the inner workings of the
> > Consul's staff I have no idea if this is due to a
> > planned effort or if it's the result of an overly
> > zealous staff. Either way the result is the same.
> > Dozens of posts in what some have called a "tag
> team"
> > effort from the Consular staff.
>
> What of that "tag team" of L. Sicinius Drusus, Q.
> Fabius Maximus,
> L. Cornelius Sulla, and occasionally a few others?
> Do these
> people not habitually oppose every action of the
> Consuls, particularly
> the Senior Consul?
>
> You attack the Consul and his allies for the very
> same behaviour you
> engage in yourself.
>
> Vale, Octavius.
>
> --
> Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
> http://www.graveyards.com/
>
>


=====
L. Sicinius Drusus

Roman Citizen

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12648 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: A more historical "Lex Fabia de Ratione Comitie .
Salve Boss

Is there anything I can do to help you with the mock election?

Vale

Tiberius
----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Gawne
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] A more historical "Lex Fabia de Ratione Comitie .


qfabiusmaxmi@... writes:

[Quite a lot, most of it addressed to the Senior Consul,
so I'm only going to address one question which bears
directly on me.]

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus had written:
> > These mock elections will soon be opened
> > by Illustrious Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> > in his capacity as Curule Aedile.

Quintus Fabius Maximus writes, in response:
> I must have missed the edict on this. Or was this supposed to be it?

No, it's not. I will publish an Aedilean Edicta addressing
the Mock Election after the Senior Consul presents the text
of the revised law for public review.

> Good for Illustrious G. Equitius Marinus, but doesn't he answer
> to you?

As Curule Aedile of Nova Roma, I answer only to the gods, the Senate,
and the People. When I accepted Caeso Fabius' offer to work with
him on his consular staff, I was quite clear about that. My
magistracy is not at his beck and call, nor in any way conditional
upon his opinions.

The idea of conducting the Mock Election began with Senator
Drusus, and it's one I think is good. I suggested the idea
to the Senior Consul before presenting it, out of courtesy.
But even if he had objected, I intended to conduct the Mock
Election anyway. I hope that the experience proves as
useful for all who participate as Senator Drusus and I
hope it will.

--
ex officio
Gn. Equitius Marinus
Curule Aedile


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12649 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: The Gauntlet
--- Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
SNIP
>
> What kind of control would you suggest? I will not
> tell the
> people who work under me in the Senior Consul's
> cohort that
> they may not speak their minds. It would not only
> be wrong,
> it would be a violation of their constitutionally
> guaranteed
> rights as citizens of Nova Roma. Were I to attempt
> such a
> thing I'd expect Caeso Fabius would dismiss me on
> the spot.
>

Sir,
If I were in your postion I would appoint 3 or 4
people as spokesmen for the staff and request (not
order) that the rest allow these persons to act as
spokesmen for the group.

You may recall that I mentioned that the Grachi didn't
set out to create an Imperial Monarchy, but that thier
efforts set off a chain of events that resulted in
that Imperial monarchy. Actions sometimes have
unintended consequances. I will accept your word that
it isn't a plan, but having a large staff personally
involved in your plans is having the unintended
consequance of making it arear that the Consul and his
staff aren't open to any crictism.


=====
L. Sicinius Drusus

Roman Citizen

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12650 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Censors and Senators
Salve Marcus Octavius Germanicus , who said in part

" Yes, though not all circumstances have been explicitly defined

should these not be defined and soon?


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

----- Original Message -----
From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Censors and Senators



Salve Quinte Lani,

> I was studying the Political offices of the Roman Empire from my
> posting yesterday. It mentions on page 3 that the senators, though
> appointed for life could actually be expelled by the Censors. Does
> this situation apply to NR as well under extreme circumstances?

Yes, though not all circumstances have been explicitly defined.

# They shall have the following honors, powers, and obligations:
[...]
# d. To maintain the album senatorium (list of Senators), including the
# power to add and remove names on that list according to
# qualifications set by law;

Removal for reasons of inactivity or disappearance was enabled through
a law passed last year, and exercised early this year.

SNIP



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12651 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-07-03
Subject: Re: Censors and Senators
Salvete Tiberi Galeri et omnes,

I'm not sure I agree with the concept of attempting to
define "all" circumstances. That would require the
foresight of the Imortals. An attempt to do so could
result in the Censors being handcuffed by the law if
an unforeseen circumstance should arise.

--- Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
> Salve Marcus Octavius Germanicus , who said in part
>
> " Yes, though not all circumstances have been
> explicitly defined
>
> should these not be defined and soon?
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 7:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Censors and Senators
>
>
>
> Salve Quinte Lani,
>
> > I was studying the Political offices of the
> Roman Empire from my
> > posting yesterday. It mentions on page 3 that
> the senators, though
> > appointed for life could actually be expelled by
> the Censors. Does
> > this situation apply to NR as well under extreme
> circumstances?
>
> Yes, though not all circumstances have been
> explicitly defined.
>
> # They shall have the following honors, powers,
> and obligations:
> [...]
> # d. To maintain the album senatorium (list of
> Senators), including the
> # power to add and remove names on that list
> according to
> # qualifications set by law;
>
> Removal for reasons of inactivity or disappearance
> was enabled through
> a law passed last year, and exercised early this
> year.
>
> SNIP
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>
>


=====
L. Sicinius Drusus

Roman Citizen

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12652 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: The Gauntlet
Salve Senator Sicini,

> Others may have have made a lot of comments on the
> size of the staff.

More so than comments, I think it was an attempt by the attackers (not
you) to humiliate the incoming administration and put it on the defensive
as quickly as possible. Never before had a tribunician veto been
requested over such a trivial matter, and so early in the term.

It was that event that set the tone for the year. How could the
cohort *not* adopt a cohesive defence, after an attempt had been
made to destroy them at birth?

> I thought and still think that the change in the
> Census law was a bad idea. I Have never had a high
> opinion of efforts to inflate the number of members of
> this organization y whatever name,

No inflation; the number of citizens listed on the main page will
soon drop, probably to about half of what it says now.

> Thus far I have supported the Consul in one case,
> continued a long standing postion contrary to him in a
> second case, and urged caution in the last case. That
> is hardly opposing everything .

If one accepts the "tag team" theories, though, it is not necessary
that each member participate in each and every debate; one can always
"sit one out" while your allies keep up a fight.

Or, the alternative is that all of us are independent thinkers -
including you, me, and the many accensi - and we post on what subject
we please; we hold opinions that usually but not always conform
to those of our friends; and we come to the defense of those people
when attacked.

If it seems that the Consuls' allies are launching a coordinated
attack against you, I assure you that, to us, it looks like you're
doing the same.

Vale, Octavius.

> --- Marcus Octavius Germanicus <hucke@...>
> wrote:
> > Salve Senator Sicini,
> >
> > > There has been a disturbing trend on this list of
> > > late. Any crictism of policies favored by the
> > Senior
> > > Consul's staff is met by a barrage of posts from
> > the
> > > Consular Cohorts and others closely allied with
> > the
> > > Senior Consul.
> >
> > Would it not also be correct to be said that any
> > action or proposal
> > of the Senior Consul or his allies is met with a
> > barrage of posts
> > from a small group of citizens who habitually oppose
> > him?
> >
> > The first such event this year was his appointment
> > of his large
> > staff - which was actually the subject of a petition
> > for intercessio!
> > Already by January 5th, when no proposals for any
> > significant changes
> > had been advanced, there was already an organized
> > effort underway
> > to neutralize the current administration.
> >
> > > Since I'm not privy to the inner workings of the
> > > Consul's staff I have no idea if this is due to a
> > > planned effort or if it's the result of an overly
> > > zealous staff. Either way the result is the same.
> > > Dozens of posts in what some have called a "tag
> > team"
> > > effort from the Consular staff.
> >
> > What of that "tag team" of L. Sicinius Drusus, Q.
> > Fabius Maximus,
> > L. Cornelius Sulla, and occasionally a few others?
> > Do these
> > people not habitually oppose every action of the
> > Consuls, particularly
> > the Senior Consul?
> >
> > You attack the Consul and his allies for the very
> > same behaviour you
> > engage in yourself.
> >
> > Vale, Octavius.
> >
> > --
> > Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
> > http://www.graveyards.com/
> >
> >
>
>
> =====
> L. Sicinius Drusus
>
> Roman Citizen
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

--
Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
http://www.graveyards.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12653 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: Censors and Senators
Salve Senator L. Sicinius Drusus

I would think that being expelled from the Senate would be one of the worst things that could befall a Senator of Nova Roma. I for one would want to know what could get be expelled and I would want it written down and not left to "mortal and fallible men. Are we not a republic of laws and not of men? And is it not why the Twelve tables were written down and place where the could be read.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: L. Sicinius Drusus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 11:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Censors and Senators


Salvete Tiberi Galeri et omnes,

I'm not sure I agree with the concept of attempting to
define "all" circumstances. That would require the
foresight of the Imortals. An attempt to do so could
result in the Censors being handcuffed by the law if
an unforeseen circumstance should arise.

--- Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
> Salve Marcus Octavius Germanicus , who said in part
>
> " Yes, though not all circumstances have been
> explicitly defined
>
> should these not be defined and soon?
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 7:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Censors and Senators
>
>
>
> Salve Quinte Lani,
>
> > I was studying the Political offices of the
> Roman Empire from my
> > posting yesterday. It mentions on page 3 that
> the senators, though
> > appointed for life could actually be expelled by
> the Censors. Does
> > this situation apply to NR as well under extreme
> circumstances?
>
> Yes, though not all circumstances have been
> explicitly defined.
>
> # They shall have the following honors, powers,
> and obligations:
> [...]
> # d. To maintain the album senatorium (list of
> Senators), including the
> # power to add and remove names on that list
> according to
> # qualifications set by law;
>
> Removal for reasons of inactivity or disappearance
> was enabled through
> a law passed last year, and exercised early this
> year.
>
> SNIP
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>
>


=====
L. Sicinius Drusus

Roman Citizen

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12654 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: Censors and Senators
I'd like to see some clarification of what constitutes nota-worthy
behaviour - though there should still be room for the Censores to
exercise some discretion.

Vale, O.

> Salve Marcus Octavius Germanicus , who said in part
>
> " Yes, though not all circumstances have been explicitly defined
>
> should these not be defined and soon?
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 7:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Censors and Senators
>
>
>
> Salve Quinte Lani,
>
> > I was studying the Political offices of the Roman Empire from my
> > posting yesterday. It mentions on page 3 that the senators, though
> > appointed for life could actually be expelled by the Censors. Does
> > this situation apply to NR as well under extreme circumstances?
>
> Yes, though not all circumstances have been explicitly defined.
>
> # They shall have the following honors, powers, and obligations:
> [...]
> # d. To maintain the album senatorium (list of Senators), including the
> # power to add and remove names on that list according to
> # qualifications set by law;
>
> Removal for reasons of inactivity or disappearance was enabled through
> a law passed last year, and exercised early this year.
>
> SNIP
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

--
Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
http://www.graveyards.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12655 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: Censors and Senators
Salve Censor

Granted the Censors should have some discretion but most reasons I would think should be written down.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 12:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Censors and Senators



I'd like to see some clarification of what constitutes nota-worthy
behaviour - though there should still be room for the Censores to
exercise some discretion.

Vale, O.

> Salve Marcus Octavius Germanicus , who said in part
>
> " Yes, though not all circumstances have been explicitly defined
>
> should these not be defined and soon?
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 7:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Censors and Senators
>
>
>
> Salve Quinte Lani,
>
> > I was studying the Political offices of the Roman Empire from my
> > posting yesterday. It mentions on page 3 that the senators, though
> > appointed for life could actually be expelled by the Censors. Does
> > this situation apply to NR as well under extreme circumstances?
>
> Yes, though not all circumstances have been explicitly defined.
>
> # They shall have the following honors, powers, and obligations:
> [...]
> # d. To maintain the album senatorium (list of Senators), including the
> # power to add and remove names on that list according to
> # qualifications set by law;
>
> Removal for reasons of inactivity or disappearance was enabled through
> a law passed last year, and exercised early this year.
>
> SNIP
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

--
Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
http://www.graveyards.com/



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12656 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: List Administration
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M Flavius Aurelius"
<m.flavius.aurelius@i...> wrote:
> Setting a citizen's posts to moderated requires that the duty of
approval or non-approval of messages falls to the moderators of the
list. But if a citizen was set to moderate for administrative
reasons, where would the moderators draw the line about what was an
approved message and what was not? And if the citizen in question is
on moderate state for "punishment", would that change what the list
administrators approve or censor?
>
>Snip for space but carefully read:

Salve Flavi,

You bring up some interesting points regarding list moderation. If I
were moderator I would suspend people from the list for the following
reasons:


1) Blowing up at the member of the opposite sex and telling her to
preform something on him or call her... you know - those wild women
of ill repute words.

2) Making statements about slagging someone's wife or husband; even
as a joke in an argument.

3) Falsely accusing a citizen of something serious without presenting
concrete evidence; I'm not talking about political quarrels over
bills and gentes legislation but something like stealing money from
NR, molesting a minor etc.

4) Out and out blaspheming or insulting the Religio Romano or even a
monotheist believer. These are the worst attacks within NR that I
have seen and tend to do the most damage, doing none of us any good.

5) Threatening the life of a citizen.

Actually I've only seen one Censor Nota since I came here for reason
no.5.


Actually "I" would rather not charge people if they personally attack
my character in a in a nasty way. We have a mechanism for that and
I'd say, "Off to the back alley with you!" I am 15 - 20 years older
than many of our citizens and there is nothing so foul, rude, crude,
obscene or wild that I have not heard before; in fact I "could" fire
off some vollies that many of you have never heard or imagined... but
I've dodged the bullit so far! Well as Sulla says, nobody has got run
off from there. Some people may think that's lowering yourself but I
think its better to blow of your steam there than drag someone
through legal proceedings out here. The back alley flare ups and
their cruditities are soon forgotten but legal action and its
consequences are not. Lets all think about this and lighten up a
little.

Regards,

Quintus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12657 From: G¥IVLIVS¥SCAVRVS Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Römische Inschriften in Germanien
G. Iulius Scaurus S. P. D.

Avete, Quirites.

Hereis a link to "Römische Inschriften in Germanien [Roman Inscriptions
in the Germaniae]":

http://www.geschichte.uni-osnabrueck.de/ausstell/ausstell.html

This site, a research project at the University of Osnabrueck aimed at
creating a supplement to CIL XIII, includes maps, photos of the project
in action, examples of various epigraph types, discussion of various
theoretical and methodological concerns, and a bibliography. The site
is in German, but may be read in English via Altavista's Babelfish
machine translation facility (with the usual caveats about the
shortcomings of machine translation) at http://world.altavista.com/.

Valete, Quirites.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12658 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: Senate Vote
Congratulations Kaeso Maximus Tiberius!

For brevity's sake, I didn't include you application in the Senate results,
but if you'd like, I'm sure that a lot of people would be interested in
hearing a bit more on Legio XXI.

And also: I found this website a few weeks ago and it include a listing of
different reenactment events. I see that youn are very active this summer,
so maybe you can send your schedule to this site as well? A little free
publicity never hurts :-)
http://www.roman-empire.net/diverse/events-calendar.html

Vale!
Diana Moravia




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12659 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul
Salve Illustra Tribuna!

I have been out of communication for 30 hours with no phone contact
or Internet communication, totally isolated. The first thing I am
doing after getting connected again is to answer You. Because of that
I haven't yet investigated this situation, but I can at least say
these things:

1. I believe in freedom of speech, but also as You know in politeness
towards all fellow citizens
2. Honorable C. Minucius Scaevola has the same freedom of speech as
everybody else, no more no less and even if he is my Accensus he
still has it.
3. Still I wouldn't myself use such words as You know and I will talk
to Honorable C. Minucius Scaevola about this.
4. But it is not the duty of the Senior Consul to deal with the rules
of the main list so I expect the Praetores to make a decison to do
what is needed.

Please remember that I don't know the circumstances or anything as I
answered You at once..

>Salvete Praetores,
>
>I believe in freedom of speech, but C Minucius emails are not expressing an
>opinion at all regarding Nova Roma and the current issues. It is bandwidth
>for the specific purpose of intimidating citizens so much that he/she will
>not speak anymore.
>
>Please resend me the list guidelines. I would like to see for myself whether
>the following comments are within them:
>
>-referring to another citizen as "rabid-weasel grudge-harboring psychotic?
>- referring to another citizen as 'dull, unintelligent, unsubtle"
>-telling a fellow citizen to "shog off", which is a censored version of
>"fuck off" but has the same meaning.
>
>The list above can go and on since he sends this type of email on a daily
>basis.
>
>Vale,
>Diana Moravia

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Consul et Senator
Propraetor Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Consulis CFQ
http://www.insulaumbra.com/cohors_consulis_cfq/
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12660 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
Salvete Praetores,

<Between your first and your second petition, less than twelve hours
<have passed. I certainly did not have time to see the first before
<the second one was posted. I wonder if you are not being slightly
<impatient.

Yeah, well C Minucius insinuation that I am a corrupt Tribune had a way of
making me extremely impatient... Sorry.

<Many different people (including C. Minucius Scaevola) have insulted
<other people on the last few days. You have now explicitly petitioned
<an action from the praetores' part (no, Diana; a simple comment is
<not enough; not even two of them) with regards to C. Minucius
<Scaevola's insults.

Ok thank you for the clarification. Why I petitioned against Scaevola in
particular? Because he has been making nasty comments like this for months
and they only get more and more nasty each time. And now lately more and
more people seem to be doing it because they are assuming that it is
socially acceptable here. Last week alone I was surprised at the comments
from Octavius, Drusus, M Marcius, and even you Praetor Salix :-p So to me a
complaint against Scaevola would hopefully calm down the first (and in my
opinion worst) domino and then the rest would calm down as well.We are
supposed to all be friends here!

<It is true that C. Minucius Scaevola's latest comments cross the line
<of what we consider acceptable. If my collega does not disagree, I
<will place C. Minucius Scaevola under moderation through a praetorial
<edictum until he presents his excuses to the praetores' satisfaction
<or until one month has passed, whatever happens first.

Thank you. That is more than enough. I see that people are talking about a
Nota from the Censores but to me that is a bit too dramatic. Just a warning
to 'play nice' is good enough for me.

I like to have a good laugh which I think most people can see that since I
often make risque comments at my own expense When Scaevola responds to
those comments, of course I laugh. He's funny.
But I am not laughing at all that he called me corrupt and dishonest. I am
working very hard for Nova Roma and can say with a clear conscience that I
have never ever done anything even slightly dishonest or corrupt as a
Tribune. Minucius must either provide proof that I have acted corruptly
within the decisions I have made as a Tribune or he will publicly apologize
to me. If he does not publicly apologize to me when he returns, then I will
look into what legal action I can take against him.

Valete,
Diana Moravia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12661 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: Attn Praetores & Senior Consul second request
Salve Octavius,

I am really dreading discussing anything with you because I know that you
can run circles around me... So I'll admit to losing any discussion before
it begins.

<As you are aware, C. Minucius Scaevola departed for a one-week vacation
<earlier today and is without internet access.
<Unfortunately, he has now been spoken against _in absentia_, and has
<no way to counter this accusation.

He was here when I spoke against him and even replied. He did counter this
accusation and did not offer the slightest apology. Instead he took no
responsibility for his comments and tried to turn it around by insinuating
that I am a dishonest (and even stupid) Tribune. The last time I publicly
complained about him he answered that I was not even worth responding to.

As for the rest of your email below, when I opened it I 'assumed' (proving
the Odd Couple's definition of that word) that it was to defend me. But
after reading your email I have to say that this is the first time that I
have never been genuinely sad and hurt in Nova Roma. I guess my skin is not
as thick as I think.

Vale,
Diana Moravia

<There will be no messages on this list from Scaevola for a week. Coming
<as that does after a statement that would be moderated, an uninformed
<observer might come to the erroneous conclusion that whatever appeals
<he has made to the praetores, censores, or consuls have been rejected
<and that he is being punished.

<Is it just to pronounce judgement when there has been no opportunity
<to present a defence? He announced his vacation *before* either praetor
<had posted on the subject of his opponents' request to silence him.
<To announce now that he is to be moderated, before there has been any
<chance for C. Minucius to counter the accusations, will serve to
<prejudice the minds of observers against him.

<To all Citizens, please be aware that Scaevola's silence on this list
<for the next week has nothing whatsoever to do with moderation or
<punishment of any sort. He has been found guilty of nothing. He is
<merely on vacation, as evidenced by his message of 11:33 EDT today.

<Note, also, that there has been no edict issued by the praetores
<against C. Minucius, and that the Praetors' statement above was
<merely indicative of a possible future course of action.

<Vale, Octavius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12662 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: groups to add to religion poll
Salve Pompeia,

Glad you're back by the way!

<And, if we wish to add to the long list of religious affiliations, we
<must not forget the Moravian Church....ahh, yes, the Moravian
<Church....ahh, Christians I do believe.

It's funny that you mentioned that. My father's funeral was at the Moravian
Church. And my mother has just purchased a plot in the Moravian cemetery.
Maybe there is some kind of weird morbid psychic link having a name like a
cemetery....

Vale!
Diana Moravia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12663 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: The Gauntlet
<The first such event this year was his appointment of his large
<staff - which was actually the subject of a petition for intercessio!
<Already by January 5th, when no proposals for any significant changes
<had been advanced, there was already an organized effort underway
<to neutralize the current administration.

Salve Octavius,

Um, your details are a bit off. I recall this quite clearly because the
Tribunes and I were scrambling to get ourselves organized. The call for
intercesio was made on January 3rd and was not against the Cohors being too
large, but against a minor being appointed to the Cohors. The Tribunes were
unanimous in their decision not to intercede and the formal refusal was made
by the Tribune Lucius Pompeius Octavianus on January 5th.

Vale,
Diana Moravia
Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12664 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: Results of Senate Vote
Salve Gaius Ursus Casca,

<I am left wondering about the entry (see below) stating that Senator
<Lucius Cornelius Sulla's vote was given by proxy.
<I would like to know who delivered the venerable Senator's vote.

Thank you for your interest! It is nice to know that someone read that post
in detail, since it took me about 2 hours to prepare it and double check my
tallies!

For your info: Lucius Sicinius Drusus delivered the vote of Lucius Cornelius
Sulla.

I'll be sure to include a note in my work-in-progress Tribune's handbook so
that this information will consistently be included in the Senate Results
that the Tribune's post here.

Vale,
Diana Moravia
Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12665 From: philippusflaviusconservatusmaior Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: alternatio de disceptatione....
to interrupt the discussion for a while
a little text for all.


Gaudeamus igitur,
Iuvenes dum sumus;
Post iucundam iuventutem,
Post molestam senectutem
Nos habebit humus,
Nos habebit humus.

Ubi sunt, qui ante nos
In mundo fuere?
Vadite ad superos,
Transite ad inferos,
Ubi iam fuere,
Ubi iam fuere.

Vita nostra brevis est,
Brevi finietur;
Venit mors velociter,
Rapit nos atrociter;
Nemini parcetur,
Nemini parcetur.

Vivat academia,
Vivant professores,
Vivat membrum quod libet,
Vivant membra quae libet;
Semper sint in flore,
Semper sint in flore.

Vivat et respublica
Et qui illam regit,
Vivat nostra civitas,
Maecenatum caritas,
Quae nos hic protegit.

Vivant omnes virgines,
Faciles, formosae,
Vivant et mulieres,
Tenerae, amabiles,
Bonae, laboriosae.

Pereat tristitia,
Pereant osores,
Pereat diabolus
Pereat papa,
Atque irrisores.


enjoy the basic message of this text.

Vale
Philippus Flavius Conservatus Maior

P.S. it was not intend by me to translate this text.
so take the chance updating latin.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 12666 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-07-04
Subject: Re: Results of Senate Vote
---M. Flavius:

If you know anything about me at all, I usually post in a candid
manner with no hidden meaning. If I had a bone to pick with my
paterfamilias, 'he' would be the first to know, not you....and vice
versa.

I do not see a post from him that he is angered by my comments.

If you choose to think I had anything else buried within my text
that's fine. I will likely continue to assume a pulse and
respirations, despite your obviously definite analysis that I meant
something vulgar.

Venerable would describe either the pope or the pontifex maximus, or
a deity...not a Senator. Offensive as it may be to you, I still find
the use of the term as it was applied 'cute'.

I am also aware of proxy protocols being a former senator, and
thought I would clarify what they were and what they are not.

Sorry to have been so terribly offensive to you.

P. Cornelia




In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M Flavius Aurelius"
<m.flavius.aurelius@i...> wrote:
> Pompeia Cornelia
>
> Is it only worth a chuckle because it is Sulla? Or the concept of
Senators being venerable amuses you in general?
>
> M Flavius Aurelius
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: pompeia_cornelia
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 8:18 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Results of Senate Vote
>
>
> ---
>
> "Venerable" Senator?
>
> Lol..never heard that coined phrase before.
>
> It is common place to ask someone to vote for you, that you
> entrust, ...please vote yes for me as I am tied up an unable to.
> This is acceptable Senatorial protocol.
>
> It is not a case of the other Senator making up the mind of
> the 'venerable' Senator, it is simply the formality of the
entrusted
> Senator voting as per the wishes of the venerable senator,.
>
> I hope you don't mind my chuckle...that is cute.
>
> Pompeia
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla"
<alexious@e...>
> wrote:
> > Ave Gaius Ursus et Omnes,
> >
> > I gave my proxy vote in the Senate to Senator Lucius Sicinus
Drusus.
> >
> > Respectfully,
> >
> > Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: zak29577
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:58 PM
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Results of Senate Vote
> >
> >
> > Salve omnes,
> >
> > While I appreciate having the results of the Senate voting
being
> > published by our Triblunus Plebis (and agree with all
results), I
> am
> > left wondering about the entry (see below) stating that
Senator
> > Lucius Cornelius Sulla's vote was given by proxy.
> >
> > I would like to know who delivered the venerable Senator's
vote.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Gaius Ursus Casca
> > Roman Citizen
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Diana Moravia Aventina"
> > <diana@p...> wrote:
> > > Tribunus Plebis Diana Moravia Aventina Quiritibus SPD
> > >
> > > Senate Voting Results published on July 3 2756.
> > >
> > > The Senate has finished its latest session and the votes
have
> been
> > tallied
> > > as follows.
> > >
> > <snip>
> > >
> > > The following 17 Senators cast votes in time. They are
referred
> to
> > below by
> > > their initials, and are listed in alphabetical order by
nomen:
> > >
> > <another snip>
> > >
> > > Lucius Cornelius Sulla (LCS) (proxy vote)
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]