Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Dec 22-27, 2003

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18470 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Command Staff Change
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18471 From: Fortunatus Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Voting Has Ended
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18472 From: Christian Koepfer Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Roman Pottery!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18473 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Command Staff Change
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18474 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Command Staff Change
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18475 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Command Staff Change
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18476 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Command Staff Change
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18477 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Roman Military
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18478 From: Livia Cornelia Hibernia Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Command Staff Change
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18479 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Command Staff Change
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18480 From: Scriboni89@aol.com Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Salve Amici...........
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18481 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Salve Amici...........
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18482 From: Legion XXIV Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Remarks in Vicesima Quarta Newsletter Dec 2003
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18483 From: Marcus Bianchius Antonius Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Command Staff Change
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18484 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Traditio Classicorum: The Fortuna of the Classical Authors to the Y
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18485 From: Scriboni89@aol.com Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Salve Amici...........
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18486 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Command Staff Change
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18487 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Question for G. Iuli Scaure (RE:Harold Lamb)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18488 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Re: Salve Amici...........
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18489 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: De absentia - De Vacationes - De Ianuary
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18490 From: Trajan Justinian Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Re: Salve Amici...........
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18491 From: FrBryanReif@aol.com Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Roman Clothing
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18492 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Edictum: Appointment of Provincial Procurator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18493 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Re: Roman Clothing
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18494 From: Scriboni89@aol.com Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Salve,
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18495 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Re: Salve,
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18496 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Re: Salve Amici...........
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18497 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: LARENTALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18498 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Saturae Iuvenalis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18499 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Re: Question for G. Iuli Scaure (RE:Harold Lamb)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18500 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-24
Subject: Re: Question for G. Iuli Scaure (RE:Harold Lamb)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18501 From: labienus@novaroma.org Date: 2003-12-24
Subject: Rogatores
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18502 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-24
Subject: Official Results in the Comitia Plebis Tributa!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18503 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2003-12-24
Subject: Virtual Legion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18504 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-24
Subject: Congratulations to the new Plebian Magistrates!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18505 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-12-24
Subject: Re: Congratulations to the new Plebian Magistrates!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18506 From: labienus@novaroma.org Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18507 From: Livia Cornelia Hibernia Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Official Results in the Comitia Plebis Tributa!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18508 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18509 From: Sp. Postumius Tubertus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18510 From: Julilla Sempronia Magna Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Official Results in the Comitia Plebis Tributa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18511 From: L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Congratulations to the new Tribunes and Aediles
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18512 From: L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Congratulations once more :-)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18513 From: Hadrianus Rutilius Bardulus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Congratulations to the new magistrates!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18514 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Nova Roma Math
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18515 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18516 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18517 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Alea iacta est
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18518 From: Alejandro Carneiro Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Congratulations from Hispania
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18519 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Math
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18520 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18521 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18522 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18523 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18524 From: sa-mann@libero.it Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: bouncing test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18525 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18526 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations once more :-)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18527 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18528 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations to the new magistrates!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18529 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18530 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18531 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18532 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18533 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18534 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18535 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18536 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18537 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Election Results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18538 From: sa-mann@libero.it Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: bouncing test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18539 From: Livia Cornelia Hibernia Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18540 From: rory12001 Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations once more :-)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18541 From: James Lee Mathews Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18542 From: Stefn_Ullarsson Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Venator scripsit: Greetings, musings and re: Election results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18543 From: Decimus Iunius Silanus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18544 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Congratulations on your election!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18545 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: The Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18546 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18547 From: Livia Cornelia Hibernia Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18548 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18549 From: Minerva Thalía Juno Vanegas Farfano Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: SENATO POPVLOQVE NOVAROMAE S.P.D.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18550 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18551 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: A wonderful year
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18552 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: A wonderful year
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18553 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: A wonderful year
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18554 From: rory12001 Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18555 From: Sp. Postumius Tubertus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Election Results: Comitia Centuriata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18556 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Congratulations, Thanks, and a Brief Absence
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18557 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Election Results: Comitia Centuriata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18558 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Ophthamology in Ancient Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18559 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: A wonderful year
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18560 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18561 From: Dennis and Louise Cantrell Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Official Results in the Comitia Plebis Tributa!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18562 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18563 From: rory12001 Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18564 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18565 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18566 From: deciusiunius Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18567 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18568 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18569 From: deciusiunius Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Congratulations to all magistrates-elect
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18570 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18571 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Congratulations to all magistrates-elect
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18572 From: deciusiunius Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18573 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Congratulations to all magistrates-elect
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18574 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: subject?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18575 From: Neil Lucock Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Roleplaying/religio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18576 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Marinus' Words
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18577 From: Flavia Lucilla Merula Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18578 From: Neil Lucock Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18579 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18580 From: Flavia Lucilla Merula Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18581 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18582 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18583 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18584 From: Flavia Lucilla Merula Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18585 From: Flavia Lucilla Merula Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18586 From: spqr_legionary Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18587 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18588 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18589 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18590 From: Livia Cornelia Hibernia Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18591 From: rory12001 Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: the ReligioBookGroup
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18592 From: FrBryanReif@aol.com Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Religion in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18593 From: Lucius Martianus Paullus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18594 From: deciusiunius Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18595 From: deciusiunius Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18596 From: deciusiunius Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18597 From: deciusiunius Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18598 From: FrBryanReif@aol.com Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Military Re-enactments
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18599 From: FrBryanReif@aol.com Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: my post on fredom of religion in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18600 From: Fr. Apulus Caesar Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Official Results in the Comitia Plebis Tributa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18601 From: Fr. Apulus Caesar Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: error in the results?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18602 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: ATTENTION MAGISTRATES Re: [ReligioRomana] New poll for ReligioRomana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18603 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: error in the results?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18604 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Religion in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18605 From: Franciscus Apulus Caesar Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: error in the results?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18606 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: error in the results?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18607 From: Livia Cornelia Hibernia Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Military Re-enactments
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18608 From: Jean de Cabilis Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Short Introduction
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18609 From: Jean de Cabilis Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Short Introduction
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18610 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18611 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Religion in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18612 From: Jean de Cabilis Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Short Introduction - Citizen's Concerns
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18613 From: Jean de Cabilis Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Short Introduction - Citizen's Concerns
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18614 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18615 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18616 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Religion in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18617 From: rory12001 Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18618 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Magistrates and the Oath of Office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18619 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18620 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18621 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18622 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18623 From: Jean de Cabilis Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Short Introduction
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18624 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: the ReligioBookGroup
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18625 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18626 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18627 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Religion in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18628 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18629 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18630 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Religion in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18631 From: Shane Evans Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Military Re-enactments
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18632 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18633 From: David Bustillos Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18634 From: daniel villanueva Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Congratulations new plebeians magistrates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18635 From: daniel villanueva Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18636 From: Neil Lucock Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18637 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Religion in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18638 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18639 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Religious Belief and Religious Practice
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18640 From: lanius117@aol.com Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18641 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Religious Belief and Religious Practice
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18642 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Religious Belief and Religious Practice
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18643 From: deciusiunius Date: 2003-12-27
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18644 From: forthegodshonor@aol.com Date: 2003-12-27
Subject: Calling All Women!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18645 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-27
Subject: Re: Calling All Women!



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18470 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Command Staff Change
Salve M Minucius Audens,

> I hereby appoint Gnaeus Equitius Marnus as:
>
> "Beneficarius and Cornicularius Primus, with the rank of Tribunus
> Militum Laticlavius Militarium. He is appointed with his Militarium
> Rank and Position a Roman Equestrian Knight."

An excellent decision Audens and beyond a doubt Marinus deserves the honor! It is nice to see that
no matter what the results are of the Consul's race, G Equitius Marinus will still be serving our
Republic.

> I ask all those members of Militarium to share in my congratulations to
> these men on the day of thier appointments.

Congratulations Marinus! Well done!

Valete,
Diana Moravia Aventina
Sacerdos Venus & Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18471 From: Fortunatus Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Voting Has Ended
T Labienus Fortunatus Consul Quiritibus SPD

Voting ended roughly an hour and a half ago in the Comitia Centuriata
and Comitia Populi Tributa. The rogatores now have forty-eight hours in
which to tabulate the results and report them to me. After that, I have
twenty-four hours in which to make those results public. Usually, it
takes a lot less than three days.

To all who voted, thank you.

Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18472 From: Christian Koepfer Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Roman Pottery!
Salve!
There is also a variety of samian, and, very soon coarse-ware
reconstructions available at
www. tarquitii.com
Best, Caius Tarquitius Saturninus


> Salvete,
>
> Some good news this morning. A member of Gens Cassia living in the Nova
> Britannia Province, Iulia Cassia Vegetia, has started a pottery business
> and is
> looking to reproduce food-quality Roman redware!
>
> I'm working with her regarding the specs now, and hopefully she'll have a
> website up for consideration by the Censors in a month or two. Right now
> she's
> figuring that a cup would go for $10 US, and a bowl or plate would go for
> around
> $20 US.
>
> Having useable and affordable pottery available would make it easier for
> NR
> Citizens to hold Roman dinner parties at events, etc. :)
>
> Valete,
>
> Marcus Cassius Julianus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

--
Bonis nocet, qui malis parcit.


+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
Neu: Preissenkung für MMS und FreeMMS! http://www.gmx.net
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18473 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Command Staff Change
Salvete quirites, et salvete Diana,

Diana Moravia Aventina wrote:

> An excellent decision Audens and beyond a doubt Marinus
> deserves the honor!

Oh, I make a good enough clerk, I suppose. That's most
of what an Adjutant does, and this is basically an
Adjutant's appointment.

> It is nice to see that no matter what the results are
> of the Consul's race, G Equitius Marinus will still be serving our
> Republic.

Oh, there's no worry there. I'm still governor of Mediatlantica
too. No shortage of work for me. Though I might need to
hire a provincial scribe soon.

> Congratulations Marinus! Well done!

Thank you Diana. It seems that we are Tribunes together,
at least for a few days. Though Tribunes of different
types.

-- Marinus (contemplating the cost of all that white armor)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18474 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Command Staff Change
Congratulations to Gnaeus Equitius Marinus! I trust that the Sodalitas
Militarium shall benefit greatly by the service of this fine statesman.

Vale;

Gaius Modius

In a message dated 12/22/2003 1:06:47 PM Eastern Standard Time,
jmath669642reng@... writes:
I hereby appoint Gnaeus Equitius Marnus as:

"Beneficarius and Cornicularius Primus, with the rank of Tribunus
Militum Laticlavius Militarium. He is appointed with his Militarium
Rank and Position a Roman Equestrian Knight."


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18475 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Command Staff Change
Salvete quirites, et salve Gai Modi,

AthanasiosofSpfd@... wrote:

> Congratulations to Gnaeus Equitius Marinus! I trust that the Sodalitas
> Militarium shall benefit greatly by the service of this fine statesman.

Oh, I trust you're absolutely right. I forsee an increase
in the work that Praefectus Castrorum Audens expects of me.

But that'll be fine. I hope to see a bit more activity
coming out of the Militarium in the coming year. As you know
we have great hopes for things in your province and mine both.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18476 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Command Staff Change
Salvete omnes,

Marcus Minucius Audens wrote:

> I hereby appoint Gnaeus Equitius Marnus as:
>
> "Beneficarius and Cornicularius Primus, with the rank of Tribunus
> Militum Laticlavius Militarium. He is appointed with his Militarium
> Rank and Position a Roman Equestrian Knight."

My thanks to Senator and Praefectus Castrorum Marcus
Minucius Audens for this quite unexpected honor.
I shall endeavor to live up to it.

Valete,

--
Gn. Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18477 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Roman Military
There were several different organizations of the Roman military forces between 700 BC with Servius Tullus and the Legions of Tiberius:

Servian Legions (700-400) with five classes of troops based on wealth as reflected in their equipment. Class I with full hoplite panoply; Class II with same equipment except no curiass and a Latin scutum; Class III with helmet, spear, sword, and Latin scutum; Class IV with javelins, sword, and scutum; Class V equipped as slingers, unshielded javelin men, and rock throwers. Cavalry were composed of those rich enough to have horses, panoply, and weapons. More information in Livy.

Camillan Legions (400-100) According to Polybius, organized in maniples of three centuries each as the basic tactical unit; with two thirds of the men designated as hastati armed with two pila, sword, pectoral breast plate, one or two greaves, scutum, and helmet. The other third being the triari or rotari armed with a 12' spear instead of pila, better armor, and composed of veterans and older men. 40 velites to each maniple armed with up to seven short javelins, sword, round shield, and helmets; acting as skirmishers, flankers, and scouts.
The cavalry in each legion was composed of 300 men trooped in 10 30-man turmae. These troops were armed with javelins, lance, sword, and round shield; armor was mail shirt or curiass and a helmet. Their function was primarily to screen the legions and act as scouts.

These first two organizations were organized by wealth and class. They featured huge baggage trains and many specialty units were supplied by allies, mercenaries, and impressed labor.

Marian Legions (100 BC-14 AD) Standard formation of 6 80-man centuries organized in 10 cohorts (first cohort was double strength 5 centuries of 160 men each) armed with two pila, sword, scutum, helmet, and body armor all supplied by the State if the recruits didn't have it themselves. Troops carried much of their own baggage and each century usually had not more than 10-12 mules for tools, tents, querns, and extra rations; double that for the centuries in first cohort. No mention of cavalry in much of the histories but the "knights" of the equestrian class were still there.
Mercenaries were primarily slingers from the Baleric Islands, archers from Crete, cavalry from Hispania and southern Gaul, and a few military engineers from Greece. Lots of information in the writings of C. Julius Caesar.

Augustan Legions (14 AD-200 AD) Much the same but the cavalry is now 120 strong per legion acting as scouts and messengers. Artillery is an integral part of each legion along with military/civil engineers and other immunes (specialists) making each legion like a modern division.
Specialty troops in the auxiliaries are organized in units of 480 (6 centuries) or 960 men; with a mixed cohort equitata having five centuries of infantry and one of cavalry. Other auxiliaries included slingers, archers, horse archers, heavy cavalry, medium cavalry, and dromedary cavalry.
There are also other military units like the Praetorian Guard, the Emperor's Horse Guards; the Emperor's German Guard, the Fleet at Misenum, and the Marines.

The legions after Septimus Severus begin to change quite a bit and are completely different by the time of Diocletian.
Most legions you see at reenactments are based on 1st Century A.D. formations.

This is a very limited overview.

F. Galerius Aurelianus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18478 From: Livia Cornelia Hibernia Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Command Staff Change
Salve M. Minucius Audens


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, jmath669642reng@w... wrote:
>
> [...snipped...]
> So in order to accomodate both the Militarium as well as retain a
valued
> officer I make the folowing appointments:
>
> I hereby appoint Gnaeus Equitius Marnus as:
>
> "Beneficarius and Cornicularius Primus, with the rank of Tribunus
> Militum Laticlavius Militarium. He is appointed with his Militarium
> Rank and Position a Roman Equestrian Knight."
>
> I hereby appoint Casca Tiberius as
>
> "Beneficarius and Cornicularius Minor with the rank of Tribunus
Militum
> Agusticlavius Militarium. He is appointed with his Militarium Rank
and
> Position a Roman Equestrian Knight."
>

Excellent appointments both!
My most sincere congratulations to both Marinus and Tiberius.

Bene Vale
Livia Cornelia Hibernia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18479 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Command Staff Change
> Oh, I make a good enough clerk, I suppose. That's most
> of what an Adjutant does, and this is basically an
> Adjutant's appointment.

> -- Marinus (contemplating the cost of all that white armor)

Salve Marinus,
Well the clerks in my office would certainly liven up the place if they wore white armour to work
:-)
Vale,
Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18480 From: Scriboni89@aol.com Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Salve Amici...........
Note: This is for any Italian Nova Romans. Sorry if it is off topic. I just
need an answer.

Salve Amici,

Io ho una domanda per un italiano/a. Che e Scopa e Briscola? Loro come
gioco? Grazie.

BENE.VALE.
I.MANERE.IN.AMORA.DI.ROMA.
ET.FORTIS.IN.FIDE.
GNAEVS.SCRIBONIVS.SCRIPTOR.
DI.LEGIO.XXIV.MA.ET.NOVA.ROMA.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18481 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Salve Amici...........
Salvete Quirites; et salve, Cn. Scriboni.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Scriboni89@a... wrote:
> Note: This is for any Italian Nova Romans. Sorry if it is off
> topic. I just need an answer.
>
> Salve Amici,
>
> Io ho una domanda per un italiano/a. Che e Scopa e Briscola?
> Loro come gioco? Grazie.

Yes; scopa and briscola are two Italian card games.
Bear in mind that they are played with an Italian deck of cards,
which is different from the American one. You can also use a Spanish
deck, which is more or less the same as an Italian one.

By the way, scopa and briscola are also played in Spain; the only
difference is that their names are respectively escoba and brisca
:-).

S.V.B.E.E.V.
CN.SALIX.T.F.A.NEP.OVF.ASTVR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18482 From: Legion XXIV Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Remarks in Vicesima Quarta Newsletter Dec 2003
Salve Gnaeus:

I agree that John Ebel's remarks were strong; but there was no mention
of NovaRoma nor any inference that the individuals he spoke of, were
NovaRoman citizens. He asked me to publish his remarks un-edited,
which I did, although I did have some reservations with some of his
comments.

I have re-read John's article and I honestly did not see any of his
remarks that directly insulted any Senators or citizens of NovaRoma.
We all, at times, have probably felt that by inference, we were being
put upon or insulted or "dissed" as they say.
Also, at times, we have look beyond what was said and be willing to
agree that we disagree.

As Commander and on behalf of Legion XXIV, I apologize for any ill
feelings concerning John's remarks.

Yours in Service to NovaRoma

Gallio Velius Marsallas, Praefectus, Legion XXIV
Tribunes Militarius, NovaRoma


----- Original Message -----
From: "Gnaeus Equitius Marinus" <gawne@...>
To: <legionxxiv@...>
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: Vicesima Quarta Newsletter Dec 2003


> Salve Gallio,
>
> While I understand that it's your organizational
> newsletter, I have to take exception to some of
> what John Ebel had to say. His word choices are
> very close to the limits of our Nova Roman slander
> and libel laws, and someone might not notice that
> you were simply passing his words along.
>
> He can insult Thomas Jefferson all he wants, because
> Jefferson is a historical personage, though I disagree
> with his opinion. However, for him to make such
> blatant statements about Nova Roman citizens who had
> serious concerns is not only a disservice to the
> Legio XXIV, it's a threat to the relationship that
> Legio XXIV enjoys with Nova Roma. He's insulted one
> of our Senators, and if that Senator happens to read
> the article he might well call for the revocation of
> Legio XXIV's recognition.
>
> Vale,
>
> --
> Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18483 From: Marcus Bianchius Antonius Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Command Staff Change
Salve,

I congratulate you on your appointment. I look forward to working with you.

May the ballista never jam.

M. Bianchius Antonius

Marcus Minucius Audens wrote:

> I hereby appoint Gnaeus Equitius Marnus as:
>
> "Beneficarius and Cornicularius Primus, with the rank of Tribunus
> Militum Laticlavius Militarium. He is appointed with his Militarium
> Rank and Position a Roman Equestrian Knight."





---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18484 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Traditio Classicorum: The Fortuna of the Classical Authors to the Y
G. Iulius Scaurus S. P. D.

Salvete, Quirites.

Here's a link to "Traditio Classicorum: The Fortuna of the Classical
Authors to the Year 1650":

http://www.theol.uni-freiburg.de/forsch/lohr/lohr-ch4.htm

This site, created by Dr. Charles Lohr, is an extensive bibliography
on the transmission of the texts of classical authors into the early
modern period. The site is also available in German.

Valete.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18485 From: Scriboni89@aol.com Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Salve Amici...........
Salve,

Well, I do happen to have a deck of them. That is why I am asking I have
received them as a gift and am curious on how to play. Do you know how?

BENE.VALE.
I.MANERE.IN.AMORA.DI.ROMA.
ET.FORTIS.IN.FIDE.
GNAEVS.SCRIBONIVS.SCRIPTOR.
DI.LEGIO.XXIV.MA.ET.NOVA.ROMA.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18486 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Re: Command Staff Change
Salve Marce Bianchi, et salvete omnes,

Marcus Bianchius Antonius wrote:
[addressing me]
> I congratulate you on your appointment. I look forward to working with you.
>
> May the ballista never jam.

And may the triarii always hold.

*grin*

Valete!

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18487 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-22
Subject: Question for G. Iuli Scaure (RE:Harold Lamb)
Salve G. Iuli Scaure,

I have to credit some of my life long interest in history to Harold
Lamb. You and I are close in age so I am sure you know of this author
who wrote from the 30's to the late 50's. I was wondering if his
books that seemed to be colorfully written like a novel actually have
any good credibility as far as historians on your level are
concerned? I believe many of his books from Hannibal to Seuliman the
Magificent are due to go to reprint in the near future. I am thinking
of reccomended them to younger readers since I thought they could at
least be a spring board for developing further future interests. Do
you agree or think his books are out to lunch? Also I would
appreciate your comments on Daniel P. Mannix who wrote, Those Of Us
About To Die and the Hell-Fire Club if you know his books.


Thank You,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18488 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Re: Salve Amici...........
Salvete, omnes -

On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 12:44:54AM -0000, Gnaeus Salix Astur wrote:
> Salvete Quirites; et salve, Cn. Scriboni.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Scriboni89@a... wrote:
> > Note: This is for any Italian Nova Romans. Sorry if it is off
> > topic. I just need an answer.
> >
> > Salve Amici,
> >
> > Io ho una domanda per un italiano/a. Che e Scopa e Briscola?
> > Loro come gioco? Grazie.
>
> Yes; scopa and briscola are two Italian card games.
> Bear in mind that they are played with an Italian deck of cards,
> which is different from the American one. You can also use a Spanish
> deck, which is more or less the same as an Italian one.
>
> By the way, scopa and briscola are also played in Spain; the only
> difference is that their names are respectively escoba and brisca
> :-).

Way back when, I ran across a version of Briscola - which I'd never
heard of until then - and had lots of fun playing it. A quick Google
search shows it as still being available; I've just downloaded a copy
(it's 53k total, with pretty graphics) and it's exactly as I remember
it. I can't vouch for its faithfulness to the original game, but it's
lots of fun and easy to play. Since it's written in Tcl/Tk, it will run
on Unix, Wind0ws, or Macs (once Tcl/Tk is installed.)

<http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/games/multiplayer/cards/briscola-4.1.tar.gz>

<http://www.tcl.tk/>


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Non omne quod licet honestum est.
Not everything that is permitted is honest.
-- Corpus Iuris Civilis: Digesta
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18489 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: De absentia - De Vacationes - De Ianuary
L. Arminius Faustus omnia quiritibus plus salutat

It is a pleasure for me announce my absentia on this end of the year and ianuary. Father Ianus brings Pax on the hand... I will have my much desired vacations... I hope coming sometimes to these lists to take a look, but I hope be on some desert beach enjoying the hottest summer of South Hemifere. (at least, what Metereology said)...


May the Gods bless our Res Publica next year.

_________________________________________________

É um prazer anunciar minha ausência neste fim de ano e em janeiro. Pai Jano traz a a Paz pelas mãos... terei minhas muito desejadas férias... Espero voltar as vezes para estas listas para dar uma olhada, mas espero estar em alguma praia deserta curtindo o verão mais quente do Hemisfério Sul. (ao menos, o que disse a Metereologia)

Possam os Deuses abençoar nossa República próximo ano.



Vale bene in pacem deorum,
L. Arminius Faustus



---------------------------------
Central anti-spam do Yahoo! Mail: com dicas, dúvidas e curiosidades!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18490 From: Trajan Justinian Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Re: Salve Amici...........
Si amico, ciao',
Vuoi giocare?
si puo trovare le instructione qui
http://www.pagat.com/aceten/briscola.html
per buscolo e' qui http://www.pagat.com/fishing/scopone.html
per scopa e scopone.
Divertiti,
Justinian



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Scriboni89@a... wrote:
> Note: This is for any Italian Nova Romans. Sorry if it is off
topic. I just
> need an answer.
>
> Salve Amici,
>
> Io ho una domanda per un italiano/a. Che e Scopa e Briscola?
Loro come
> gioco? Grazie.
>
> BENE.VALE.
> I.MANERE.IN.AMORA.DI.ROMA.
> ET.FORTIS.IN.FIDE.
> GNAEVS.SCRIBONIVS.SCRIPTOR.
> DI.LEGIO.XXIV.MA.ET.NOVA.ROMA.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18491 From: FrBryanReif@aol.com Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Roman Clothing
Salve,

Where can I find an authentic roman tunic and toga? Can the tunic be claf or ankle length for a civilian citizen?

Thanks,

Quintus Bianchius Rufinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18492 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Edictum: Appointment of Provincial Procurator
Edictum Praetorium Americum Mediatlanticum V Praetoris Equiti Marini:
Appointment of Provincial Procurator

Gn. Equitius Marinus Praetoris Quiritibus salutem plurimam dixit:

Servius Fidelius Longinus is hereby appointed Procurator (financial
officer) for Mediatlantica Provincia.

Given under my hand in America Mediatlantica Provincia, ante diem
X Kal. Ianuarias MMDCCLVI, this year of the consulship of
Caeso Fabius Quintilianus and Titus Labienus Fortunatus.

(23 Dec 2003 C.E.)

--
ex officio
Gn. Equitius Marinus
Propraetor America Mediatlantica Provincia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18493 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Re: Roman Clothing
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, FrBryanReif@a... wrote:
> Salve,
>
> Where can I find an authentic roman tunic and toga? Can the tunic
be claf or ankle length for a civilian citizen?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Quintus Bianchius Rufinus


Salve,

Try this:

http://www.lawrensnest.com/

Be sure to identify yourself as a NR cive.

Vale,
Gaius Popillius Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18494 From: Scriboni89@aol.com Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Salve,
Salve,

Does anyone know anything about the Piceni tribe in Ancient Italy on the
Adriatic Coast?




BENE.VALE.
I.MANERE.IN.AMORA.DI.ROMA.
ET.FORTIS.IN.FIDE.
GNAEVS.SCRIBONIVS.SCRIPTOR.
DI.NOVA.ROMA.ET.LEGIO.XXIV.MA.
ET.LVDVS.MAGNVS.GLADIATORE.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18495 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Re: Salve,
Scriboni89@... wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> Does anyone know anything about the Piceni tribe in Ancient Italy on the
> Adriatic Coast?

Here's the little bit that Britannica has to say about them:

"Early Iron Age inhabitants of the Adriatic coast of Italy from Rimini
to the Sangro River. Men and women dressed in wool; men wore armour,
weapons, and ornaments of bronze or iron; women had numerous fibulae,
torques, bracelets, girdles, and ornamental pendants. They had two main
centres, one at Novilara in the north, and another around Belmonte and
Fermo farther south. The Piceni traded with the Greeks as early as the
7th century BC, but there is little evidence of trade with Etruria,
except at the inland site of Fabriano. The evidence suggests that Piceni
were warlike, with little artistic ability of their own, but wealthy
enough to sustain a flourishing trade. In 268 BC their territory was
annexed by Rome."

See http://www.britannica.com:80/eb/article?eu=61418

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18496 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Re: Salve Amici...........
Salvete Quirites; et salve,

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Scriboni89@a... wrote:
> Salve,
>
> Well, I do happen to have a deck of them. That is why I am
> asking I have received them as a gift and am curious on how to
> play. Do you know how?

http://www.pagat.com/aceten/briscola.html
http://www.pagat.com/fishing/scopone.html

Google + 10 seconds :-).

S.V.B.E.E.V.
CN.SALIX.T.F.A.NEP.OVF.ASTVR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18497 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: LARENTALIA
G. Iulius Scaurus Flamen Quirinalis et Pontifex S. P. D.

Salvete, Quirites.

The Larentalia is the parentatio festival of Acca Larentia. According
to Varro (de Ling. Lat. vi.23; cf. Festus, s.v. Larentalia), the
Flamen Quirinalis led the Pontifices to the Velabrum near the Via
Nova, where the tomb of Acca Larentia was located. A sacrifice was
performed and the epulum feast associated with the parentalia of the
Manes was observed by the priests.

Acording to Livy (i.4), Acca Larentia was the wife of Faustulus who
became the nurse-mother of the foundling Romulus and Remus and for her
selfless service to the founder of Rome was regarded as the Dea
Tacita, the Silent Goddess, who stood highest among the Di Manes.
This tradition is confirmed by Ovid (Fasti iii.57). Another
tradition, cited by Livy (i.4.7) as doubtful, but reported also in
Macrobius (Saturnalia i.10; Plutarch, Romulus 4,5 and Quaest. Rom. 35,
as well as Aulus Gellius vi.7 report a similar tradition), regarded
Acca Larentia as a prostitute ("lupa," also the Latin word for a
she-wolf) and mistress of Hercules who later married a man of great
wealth; she is said to have left that wealth to the Roman people.
Masurius Sabinus in his Memoralia reports historical traditions which
regard Acca Larentia as Romulus nurse-mother and report that on the
death of one of her twelve sons, Romulus volunteered to join them,
forming the Arval Brotherhood.

The following parentatio for Acca Larentia was performed today by the
Flamen Quirinalis.

Since Acca Larentia is numbered among the Di Inferni, I prepared for
the ritual by digging a ditch in my yard where I built a focus for her
offerings. Beside it I erected an altar to the Di Consentes et
Indignites whom I would call upon to witness the offerings of the
Larentalia. I bathed in preparation, then, garbed in toga praetexta,
cinctu Gabino, capite velato, I began the praefatio.

Praefatio

"Iane pater, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces precor, uti sies
volens propitius mihi et Senatui Populoque Novae Romae [Father Ianus,
by offering this incense to you I pray good prayers, so that you may
be propitious to me and the Senate and People of Nova Roma." I placed
incense in the focus of the altar.

"Iuppiter, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces precor, uti sies volens
propitius mihi et Senatui Populoque Novae Romae [Iuppiter, by offering
this incense to you I pray good prayers, so that you may be propitious
to me and the Senate and People of Nova Roma." I placed incense in
the focus of the altar.

"Mars pater, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces precor, uti sies
volens propitius mihi et Senatui Populoque Novae Romae [Father Mars,
by offering this incense to you I pray good prayers, so that you may
be propitious to me and the Senate and People of Nova Roma.]" I
placed incense in the focus of the altar.

"Quirine pater, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces precor, uti sies
volens propitius mihi et Senatui Populoque Novae Romae [Father
Quirinus, by offering this incense to you I pray good prayers, so that
you may be propitious to me and the Senate and People of Nova Roma.]"
I placed incense in the focus of the altar.

"Iane pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Father Ianus, as by offering
to you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the sake of
this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation from the
patera on the focus of the altar.

"Iuppiter, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Iuppiter, as by offering to
you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the sake of
this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation from the
patera on the focus of the altar.

"Mars pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Father Mars, as by offering
to you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the sake of
this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation from the
patera on the focus of the altar.

"Quirine pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Father Quirinus, as by
offering to you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the
sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation
from the patera on the focus of the altar.

I washed my hands in preparation for the praecatio.

Precatio

"Acca Larentia, nutrix Romuli Remique, benefactrix gentis Romanae,
tibi sacram memoriam et gratias pias debemus, mater populi Romani;
tibi fieri oportet in hoc loco memoriae sacrae culignam vini dapi,
eius rei ergo macte hac illace dape pollucenda esto [Acca Larentia,
nurse-mother of Romulus and Remus, benefactor of the Roman race, to
you we owe sacred memory and devout thanks, mother of the Roman
people; it is proper for a cup of wine to be given to you in this
place of sacred memory for the sacred feast, for the sake of this
thing may you be honoured by this feast offering.]" I poured a
libation from the patera on the focus in the ditch.

Again I washed my hands in preparation for the redditio.

Redditio

"Tantae nutrix Acca Larentia gentis, Dea Tacita, macte istace dape
pollucenda esto, macte vino inferio esto [Larentia, foster-mother of
such a race, Silent Goddess, may you be honoured by this feast
offering, may you be honoured by the humble wine.]" I offered Acca
Larentia cakes, cheese, and wine on the focus in the ditch.

"Quirine pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Father Quirinus, as by
offering to you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the
sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation
from the patera on the focus of the altar.

"Mars pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Father Mars, as by offering
to you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the sake of
this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation from the
patera on the focus of the altar.

"Iuppiter, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Iuppiter, as by offering to
you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the sake of
this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation from the
patera on the focus of the altar.

"Iane pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Father Ianus, as by offering
to you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the sake of
this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation from the
patera on the focus of the altar.

"Dea Vesta, custos ignis sacri, macte vino inferio esto [Goddess
Vesta, guardian of the sacred fire, be honoured by this humble wine.]"
I poured a libation from the patera on the focus of the altar.

"Illicet. [It is over.]"

I profaned wine, cakes, and cheese, and reclining on a pallet,
beneeath a fur blanket, beside the ditch I partook of the epulum with
Acca Larentia, praying as I ate and offering libations in my private
devotions.

Piaculum

Since the ritus of the Larentalia has yet to be recovered from
literary or archaeological sources, the ritus I used was of my own
composition, based on similar rituals and the parentatio for the Di
Manes. Therefore, I concluded with a piaculum to Acca Larentia.

"Acca Larentia, Dea Nurtix, si quidquam tibi in hac Larentalia
displicet, hoc vino inferio veniam peto et vitium meum expio [Acca
Larentia, Divine Foster-Mother, if anything in this Larentalia is
displeasing to you, with this humble wine I ask forgiveness and
expiate my fault.]" I poured a libation into the focus of the ditch.

In accordance with the mos maiorum I closed the ditch and filled it in.

Valete, Quirites.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Flamen Quirinalis et Pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18498 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Saturae Iuvenalis
G. Iulius Scaurus S. P. D.

Salvete, Quirites.

Here's a link to an annotated critical edition of Iuvenal's _Satires_:

http://www.curculio.org/Juvenal/index.html

This is a portion of Dr. Michael Hendry's site on critical editing of
Latin texts.

Valete.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18499 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2003-12-23
Subject: Re: Question for G. Iuli Scaure (RE:Harold Lamb)
G. Iulius Scaurus Q. Lanio Paulino salutem dicit.

Salve, Q. Lani.

> I have to credit some of my life long interest in history to Harold
> Lamb. You and I are close in age so I am sure you know of this author
> who wrote from the 30's to the late 50's. I was wondering if his
> books that seemed to be colorfully written like a novel actually have
> any good credibility as far as historians on your level are
> concerned? I believe many of his books from Hannibal to Seuliman the
> Magificent are due to go to reprint in the near future. I am thinking
> of reccomended them to younger readers since I thought they could at
> least be a spring board for developing further future interests. Do
> you agree or think his books are out to lunch? Also I would
> appreciate your comments on Daniel P. Mannix who wrote, Those Of Us
> About To Die and the Hell-Fire Club if you know his books.

I'm sorry to disappoint, but I've not read these novels and have no
idea as to their authenticity.

Vale.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18500 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-24
Subject: Re: Question for G. Iuli Scaure (RE:Harold Lamb)
Salve Gai Iuli Scaure,

Thanks for answering anyway. Have a great holiday season and I'll be
looking foward to your input in the new year!


Quintus Lanius Paulinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "g_iulius_scaurus" <gfr@w...> wrote:
> G. Iulius Scaurus Q. Lanio Paulino salutem dicit.
>
> Salve, Q. Lani.
>
> > I have to credit some of my life long interest in history to
Harold
> > Lamb. You and I are close in age so I am sure you know of this
author
> > who wrote from the 30's to the late 50's. I was wondering if his
> > books that seemed to be colorfully written like a novel actually
have
> > any good credibility as far as historians on your level are
> > concerned? I believe many of his books from Hannibal to Seuliman
the
> > Magificent are due to go to reprint in the near future. I am
thinking
> > of reccomended them to younger readers since I thought they could
at
> > least be a spring board for developing further future interests.
Do
> > you agree or think his books are out to lunch? Also I would
> > appreciate your comments on Daniel P. Mannix who wrote, Those Of
Us
> > About To Die and the Hell-Fire Club if you know his books.
>
> I'm sorry to disappoint, but I've not read these novels and have no
> idea as to their authenticity.
>
> Vale.
>
> G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18501 From: labienus@novaroma.org Date: 2003-12-24
Subject: Rogatores
Salvete

Would one of the rogatores please contact me? I don't have access to my email
address list right now.

Valete
Fortunatus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18502 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-24
Subject: Official Results in the Comitia Plebis Tributa!
Tribunus Plebis Diana Moravia Aventina Comitia Plebis Tributa SPD

Salvete,

As what is most likely my last official duty as Tribunus Plebis of 2756, I am happy to announce the
certified results of the election for the Plebeian magistrates of 2757.

Due to the small size of many Plebeian Tribes, the actual Tribe numbers won by each candidate will
not be published in order to protect voter confidentialty.

In the election for TRIBUNUS PLEBIS

Franciscus Apulus Caesar won 29 Tribes
Lucius Arminius Faustus won 27 Tribes
Julilla Sempronia Magna won 25 Tribes
Gaius Modius Athanasius: won 25 Tribes
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus: won 18 Tribes
Lucius Quintius Constantius: won 14 Tribes
Lucius Sicinius Drusus won 7 Tribes

The 5 Tribunes of 2757 will therefore be
Franciscus Apulus Caesar (Senior Tribune)
Lucius Arminius Faustus
Julilla Sempronia Magna
Gaius Modius Athanasius
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


In the election for AEDILIS PLEBIS

Emilia Curia Finnica: 32 Tribes
Marcus Calidius Gracchus 28
Secundus Avisius Apollinarius 4 Tribes

The 2 Plebeian Aediles of 2757 will therefore be:

Emilia Curia Finnica
Marcus Calidius Gracchus

My congratulations to all of our winners and my thnaks to all of the non-winners who offered
themselves to serve our Republic!

My personal thanks to our team of Rogatores for all of their hard work!

Valete,
Diana Moravia Aventina
Senior Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18503 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2003-12-24
Subject: Virtual Legion
G. Iulius Scaurus S. P. D.

Salvete, Quirites.

Here's a link to the "Virtual Legion":

http://www.clasondesign.com/v_legio/index.htm

Curt Clason's site provides an high technology introduction to the
Roman army. The graphics are superb.

Valete.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18504 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-24
Subject: Congratulations to the new Plebian Magistrates!
Diana Moravia Aventina wrote:

> The 5 Tribunes of 2757 will therefore be
> Franciscus Apulus Caesar (Senior Tribune)
> Lucius Arminius Faustus
> Julilla Sempronia Magna
> Gaius Modius Athanasius
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

Congratulations to you all. Caeser, my dear colleague, it is
*so* good to see you attain this honor. And what a fine cohort
of colleagues! Faustus, you will be a Tribune to compare with
Marcus Livius Drusus of antiquity. Julilla... oh, I'm sure
the shade of Cornelia mother of the Gracchi looks down on
this tonight and rejoices to see the name Sempronia return
to the Tribunician bench. Gaius Modius Athanasius, staunch
defender of our virtues, it is good to see your name in this
list. And finally, Tiberius, my Quaestor, my right hand this
year, steps on to his next honor along the cursus honorum.

> The 2 Plebeian Aediles of 2757 will therefore be:
>
> Emilia Curia Finnica
> Marcus Calidius Gracchus

Congratulations to you both. Emilia Curia, I am particularly
pleased to see you entering the Collegium Aedilium. We have
worked together in the past, and I am sure you will bring great
honor to the Plebian Aediliship. Marcus Calidius, congratulations
and thank you for stepping forward to place yourself into the
service of Ceres.

Congratulations finally to all Plebian citizens who voted, and who
have given us such a fine set of magistrates for next year.

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18505 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-12-24
Subject: Re: Congratulations to the new Plebian Magistrates!
Salve Marinus

Thank you for you kind words. I hope we will be hearing other good election news soon.


Vale

Tiberius

----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Gawne
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 9:41 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Congratulations to the new Plebian Magistrates!


Diana Moravia Aventina wrote:

> The 5 Tribunes of 2757 will therefore be
> Franciscus Apulus Caesar (Senior Tribune)
> Lucius Arminius Faustus
> Julilla Sempronia Magna
> Gaius Modius Athanasius
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

Congratulations to you all. Caeser, my dear colleague, it is
*so* good to see you attain this honor. And what a fine cohort
of colleagues! Faustus, you will be a Tribune to compare with
Marcus Livius Drusus of antiquity. Julilla... oh, I'm sure
the shade of Cornelia mother of the Gracchi looks down on
this tonight and rejoices to see the name Sempronia return
to the Tribunician bench. Gaius Modius Athanasius, staunch
defender of our virtues, it is good to see your name in this
list. And finally, Tiberius, my Quaestor, my right hand this
year, steps on to his next honor along the cursus honorum.

> The 2 Plebeian Aediles of 2757 will therefore be:
>
> Emilia Curia Finnica
> Marcus Calidius Gracchus

Congratulations to you both. Emilia Curia, I am particularly
pleased to see you entering the Collegium Aedilium. We have
worked together in the past, and I am sure you will bring great
honor to the Plebian Aediliship. Marcus Calidius, congratulations
and thank you for stepping forward to place yourself into the
service of Ceres.

Congratulations finally to all Plebian citizens who voted, and who
have given us such a fine set of magistrates for next year.

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18506 From: labienus@novaroma.org Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
T Labienus Fortunatus Consul Quiritibus SPD

The rogatores have finished tallying the votes, and have reported the results
to me. Now, all that remains is for me to make those results public.

As I do so, you will note that the results are broken down into "first round",
"second round", and so on. This is due to the method specified in the Leges
Fabiae for counting votes. In a nutshell, this method runs through the votes
cast over and over so long as the position(s) in contest are not filled. With
each new run ("round"), the candidate with the lowest votes is eliminated, and
votes for any candidate which has already been elected are ignored.

And now, without further ado, here are the results.

In the Comitia Centuriata:

CENSOR

In the first round, 49 Centuries cast ballots; 26 were required for election:

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus: 25 Centuries
Quintus Fabius Maximus: 24 Centuries

No one was elected in the first round. According to the Lex Fabia de Ratione
Comitiorum Centuriatorum, Quintus Fabius Maximus is eliminated as having fewer
centuries.

In the second round, 39 Centuries cast ballots; 19 were required for election:

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus: 39 Centuries and is therefore duly elected.

CONSUL

In the first round, 49 Centuries cast ballots; 26 were required for election:

Gnaeus Salix Astur: 28 Centuries
Diana Moravia Aventina: 16 Centuries
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus: 5 Centuries

Gnaeus Salix Astur is duly elected as the senior consul in the first round.

In the second round, 49 Centuries cast ballots; 26 were required for election:

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus: 25 Centuries
Diana Moravia Aventina: 24 Centuries

No one was elected in the second round. According to the Lex Fabia de Ratione
Comitiorum Centuriatorum, Diana Moravia Aventina is eliminated as having fewer
centuries.

In the third round, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus is elected Jr. Consul with 43
centuries casting ballots; 22 were required for election.

PRAETOR

In the first round, 49 Centuries cast ballots; 26 were required for election:

Marcus Arminius Maior: 38 Centuries (Elected)
Gnaeus Octavius Noricus: 6 Centuries
Decimus Iunius Silanus: 5 Centuries

In the second round, 45 Centuries cast ballots; 25 were required for election:

Gnaeus Octavius Noricus: 28 Centuries (Elected)
Decimus Iunius Silanus:: 17 Centuries

Lex Labiena de Iure Civium: Yes: 45 No: 3 Abstain: 1

Lex Labiena de Gentibus: Yes: 39 No: 10

Lex Fabia Labiena de Iure Augurum: Yes: 43 No: 5 Abstain: 1

Lex Labiena de Obnuntiatione: Yes: 46 No: 2 Abstain: 1

As they are constitutional amendments, all of the leges mentioned above now
require the approval of 2/3rds of the senate in order to become law.

In the Comitia Populi Tributa

QUAESTOR

Caius Curius Saturninus 34 tribes (Elected)
Marcus Bianchius Antonius 34 Tribes (Elected)
Gaia Fabia Livia: 33 Tribes (Elected)
Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia 33 Tribes (Elected)
Livia Cornelia Hibernia: 33 Tribes (Elected)
Caius Iulius Marius: 33 Tribes (Elected)
Servius Labienus Cicero: 33 Tribes (Elected)
Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa: 32 Tribes (Elected)

AEDILIS CURULIS
Marcus Iulius Perusianus: 35 Tribes (Elected)
Gaius Iulius Scaurus: 35 Tribes (Elected)

Gaius Iulius Scaurus is the senior aedilis, chosen by lot.

ROGATOR

Aulus Apollonius Cordus: 35 Tribes (Elected, Sr. Rogator)
Gaius Minucius Hadrianus 34 Tribes (Elected)
Flavius Galerius Aurelianus Secundus: 33 Tribes (Elected)

CURATOR ARANEUM

Marcus Octavius Germanicus 35 Tribes (Elected)

CURATOR DIFFERIUM

Marcus Minucius Audens 34 Tribes (Elected)

Lex Labiena de Nominibus Mutandis: Yes: 31 Tribes No: 4 Tribes

I must admit that I'm very surprised that this lex passed, considering that D
Iunius rightly pointed out (after voting had begun, unfortuantely) that it is
flawed to the point of uselessness. I would ask the tribuni plebis to veto its
passage, but there is no real legal ground on which to do so. However, as it
is obvious that the intent of this lex is congruent with the will of the
populace, I will be working with next years' consules to have it replaced with
a lex that actually does what this one was intended to do.

Finally, congratulations to the winners and thank you to everyone who ran.
This was a very close election peopled with excellent candidates. I wish
everyone the best of fortune in their new jobs next year. May the Gods guide
you, and may Nova Roma prosper under your guidance.

Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18507 From: Livia Cornelia Hibernia Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Official Results in the Comitia Plebis Tributa!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Diana Moravia Aventina"
<diana@p...> wrote:
> [...snipped...]
> The 5 Tribunes of 2757 will therefore be
> Franciscus Apulus Caesar (Senior Tribune)
> Lucius Arminius Faustus
> Julilla Sempronia Magna
> Gaius Modius Athanasius
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

My most sincere congratulations to the new Tribune Plebis for
MMDCCLVII A.V.C. I am certain that they will all prove to be
great assets to our Res Publica. The out-going tribunes, in
particular Diana Moravia Aventina have set the bar very high,
but I am certain that these fine Citizens are up to the
challenge. Again, Congratulations!

>
> [...snipped...]
> The 2 Plebeian Aediles of 2757 will therefore be:
>
> Emilia Curia Finnica
> Marcus Calidius Gracchus
> [...snipped...]

Also, my heartfelt congratualtions to the new Plebeian Aediles
for next year. The games of MMDCCLVI A.V.C. were exciting, even
if the Ludi Circenses were frequently marked by some excesses of
factional trickery. There is a high mark to reach, but I am confident
that these outstanding Citizens are more than up to the task.
Once again, Congratulations!

Valete
Livia Cornelia Hibernia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18508 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: (no subject)
-----Original Message-----
From: Scriboni89@...
Sent: Nov 22, 2003 4:57 AM
To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] (no subject)


Salve,

ÊÊÊ I was reading on one of the e-mails and I recall someone saying that the
program that distributes the voter codes passes over minors. Is that true.
Also if I don't get a voter code would I still get a century and tribe?

BENE.VALE.
I.MANERE.IN.AMORA.DI.ROMA.
ET.FORTIS.IN.FIDE.
GNAEVS.SCRIBONIVS.SCRIPTOR.
DI.LEGIO.XXIV.MA.ET.NOVA.ROMA.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18509 From: Sp. Postumius Tubertus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Salve Troiane,

> I was reading on one of the e-mails and I recall someone saying that the
> program that distributes the voter codes passes over minors. Is that true.

Yes, this is true.

> Also if I don't get a voter code would I still get a century and tribe?

Technically, yes. Practically, no. You would be assigned, as I am, to Tribe 0, and Century 0, both of which do not vote.

I hope this answers you satisfactorily. If not, please e-mail me privately (princeps_senator@...), and I'll certainly try to get you a better answer. In fact, if you have any questions on anything, I try to keep my e-mail open for incoming mail.

Vale,

Sp. Postumius Tubertus

Civis Privatus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18510 From: Julilla Sempronia Magna Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Official Results in the Comitia Plebis Tributa
>Tribunus Plebis Diana Moravia Aventina Comitia Plebis Tributa SPD

> Salvete,

> As what is most likely my last official duty as Tribunus Plebis of 2756, I
am
happy to announce the certified results of the election for the Plebeian
magistrates of 2757.

> In the election for TRIBUNUS PLEBIS


> The 5 Tribunes of 2757 will therefore be
> Franciscus Apulus Caesar (Senior Tribune)
> Lucius Arminius Faustus
> Julilla Sempronia Magna
> Gaius Modius Athanasius
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

Ecastor! What an honour to be elected to serve with such fine tribunes! I
look forward to working with you all in service to our fellow Plebeians and
to the continued growth of Nova Roma.

> In the election for AEDILIS PLEBIS

> The 2 Plebeian Aediles of 2757 will therefore be:

> Emilia Curia Finnica
> Marcus Calidius Gracchus

Felicitatio to you both! You'll do the office proud!

---
multas gratias to all who voted,
@____@ Julilla Sempronia Magna
|||| www.villaivlilla.com/
@____@ Daily Life in Ancient Rome
|||| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Factio Praesina
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/factiopraesina/


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18511 From: L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Congratulations to the new Tribunes and Aediles
Salvete omnes

It is a pleasure to know you have been elected to represent the plebs and to serve the Res Publica next year.
I wish you all the best, Apulus Caesar, Arminius Faustus, Sempronia Magna, Modius Athanasius, Galerius Paulinus, Curia Finnica and Calidius Gracchus. I know you'll go more than a step forward. Best of lucks, and my collaboration for those items you would require from me. :-)


vale bene in pace deorum,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
TRIBVNVS·PLEBIS

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18512 From: L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Congratulations once more :-)
Salvete omnes

I must congratulate the new magistrates elected. Fabius Quintilianus will do a great job, I'm sure. On the other hand, Salix Astur and Equitius Marinus are to lead us into a rising of the Res Publica, and therefore I applaud them for that. Praetors and Quaestors will do an excelent job, and on the Curule chair, the Aedilis will have a lot of job entertaining us and providing with funny games, which is out of doubt they'll be great. On the other hand, my congratulations for the rest of the elected citizens and a call for those not elected; although you don't have an official post, you can help as all the citizenry those who are in the chairs, and therefore I hope you'll work for them as any other. Only one can be named the winner; the Res Publica. :-)


vale bene in pace deorum,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
TRIBVNVS·PLEBIS


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18513 From: Hadrianus Rutilius Bardulus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Congratulations to the new magistrates!
Salvete omnes cives.


I want to congratulate to our new elected Magistrates. May the Gods and
the Goddesses of Rome guide you in your work!

And to all the citizens, I wish them a happy Dies Natalis Solis
Invictii. May Apollo, Mithras and Sol Indiges shine upon you!


Dii vos bene ament,

H·RVTILIVS·IOS·FIL·RVD·NEP·CLVST·TRIB·BARDVLVS
CIVIS·PRIVATVS


_______________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Sorteos
¡Ya puedes comprar Lotería de Navidad!
http://yahoo.ventura24.es/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18514 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Nova Roma Math
5 > 16
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18515 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Congratulations
To Gnaeus Equitius Marinus for being SELECTED Consul in a Landslide that
dwarfs the one President Bush won in 2000.

L. Sicinius Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18516 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Salvete omnes, et tu, Sicinius Drusus

It would be a pity to start attacking right from the very beggining,
even before any magistrate makes her/his oath.

I would ask you, Sicinius Drusus, to respect those who have been
LEGALLY elected as magistrates of our Res Publica. If you are not
agree with the system, do not "dwarf" those elected with it, and try
to build, not to split, debating what would be your proposals.

As I said before, those who have been not elected can do a lot. But
attacking in such way them is not within the ethics of a Roman nor
the path to improve. Many times I see arguments "Ad Hominem" and not
about the subject itself. I ask all the citizens, and specially you,
Sicinius Drusus, to respect and to build with those elected. Nova
Roma is to win, not individuals.


vale bene,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Sicinius Drusus" <drusus@b...>
wrote:
> To Gnaeus Equitius Marinus for being SELECTED Consul in a
Landslide that
> dwarfs the one President Bush won in 2000.
>
> L. Sicinius Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18517 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Alea iacta est
SALVETE CIVES

I want to make my personal congratulations to all the Cives for next
year offices: we now have a strong Res Publica, we will have the
strongest one in the future.
I have to say that all my preferences were confirmed, too. This is a
great pleasure, for me!

In particular, I want to give all the honours to:

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Censor

Gnaeus Salix Astur Senior Consul

Marcus Iulius Perusianus Aedilis Curulis

Franciscus Apulus Caesar Senior Tribunus


Best wishes to all these men.

L IUL SULLA
Civis Romanus
Italia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18518 From: Alejandro Carneiro Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Congratulations from Hispania
As propraetor of Hispania, it is a honor for me to know that a
hispanic is new consul of Nova Roma.
Congratulations to Salix Astur and to the rest of new magistrates.
This year will be a great one!

Salix Galaicus, propraetor Hispaniae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18519 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Math
> 5 > 16

Not at all. If you read the lex, and perhaps work out a simulation
or two, you might realize that a second-place finish in a large number
of centuries is better than a first-place finish in a smaller number
of centuries - and that's what happened.

--
Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
http://www.graveyards.com/
Anything worth doing is worth doing to excess;
moderation is for monks. - Heinlein
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18520 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
You may be in luck.

A vote counting scam that selects a candidate who carrys 5 Centuries
over a Candiadte that carries 16 Centuries is causing me to question
retaining membership in this organization. You just might be able to
turn this organization into the total joke of a "Modern 28th Century
Micronation" that has little or nothing to do with Roma, without hearing
another word from me.

Drusus


L. Didius Geminus Sceptius wrote:

> Salvete omnes, et tu, Sicinius Drusus
>
> It would be a pity to start attacking right from the very beggining,
> even before any magistrate makes her/his oath.
>
> I would ask you, Sicinius Drusus, to respect those who have been
> LEGALLY elected as magistrates of our Res Publica. If you are not
> agree with the system, do not "dwarf" those elected with it, and try
> to build, not to split, debating what would be your proposals.
>
> As I said before, those who have been not elected can do a lot. But
> attacking in such way them is not within the ethics of a Roman nor
> the path to improve. Many times I see arguments "Ad Hominem" and not
> about the subject itself. I ask all the citizens, and specially you,
> Sicinius Drusus, to respect and to build with those elected. Nova
> Roma is to win, not individuals.
>
>
> vale bene,
>
> L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Sicinius Drusus" <drusus@b...>
> wrote:
> > To Gnaeus Equitius Marinus for being SELECTED Consul in a
> Landslide that
> > dwarfs the one President Bush won in 2000.
> >
> > L. Sicinius Drusus
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>
> *Yahoo! Groups Sponsor*
> ADVERTISEMENT
> <http://rd.yahoo.com/SIG=12cc6ps4o/M=243273.4326031.5516772.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705313712:HM/EXP=1072439607/A=1750744/R=0/*http://servedby.advertising.com/click/site=552006/bnum=1072353207688498>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Yahoo! Groups Links*
>
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18521 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
> You may be in luck.
>
> A vote counting scam that selects a candidate who carrys 5 Centuries
> over a Candiadte that carries 16 Centuries is causing me to question
> retaining membership in this organization.

If I recall correctly, you *supported* the change in the vote-counting
law, while I voted against it (considering it too complicated to be
practical).


--
Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
http://www.graveyards.com/
Anything worth doing is worth doing to excess;
moderation is for monks. - Heinlein
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18522 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
I Stated that the law was an improvement due to the more historic method
of voting but was still flawed by the inane vote counting method. I had
hoped it could be corrected before it caused problems. That was wishful
thinking.

You have your modern micronation. Enjoy it.

Drusus

Marcus Octavius Germanicus wrote:

>
>
> > You may be in luck.
> >
> > A vote counting scam that selects a candidate who carrys 5 Centuries
> > over a Candiadte that carries 16 Centuries is causing me to question
> > retaining membership in this organization.
>
> If I recall correctly, you *supported* the change in the vote-counting
> law, while I voted against it (considering it too complicated to be
> practical).
>
>
> --
> Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
> http://www.graveyards.com/
> Anything worth doing is worth doing to excess;
> moderation is for monks. - Heinlein
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Yahoo! Groups Links*
>
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18523 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Sicinius Drusus" <drusus@b...>
wrote:
> You may be in luck.
>
> A vote counting scam that selects a candidate who carrys 5 Centuries
> over a Candiadte that carries 16 Centuries is causing me to question
> retaining membership in this organization. You just might be able to
> turn this organization into the total joke of a "Modern 28th Century
> Micronation" that has little or nothing to do with Roma, without
hearing
> another word from me.
>
> Drusus

Salve,

It's obvious that you do not understand what happened nor the law that
you vocally supported for passage. Allow me to illustrate with an
example:

1st Round
Century 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
1st Place A B A C A A A B A A A B B C A A A
2nd Place C A C B B C C A C C B A A B C C B
3rd Place B C B A C B B C B B C C C A B B C

9 Centuries are required to win:
Candidate A has 11 centuries and is elected.
Candidate B has 4 Centuries
Candidate C has 2 Centuries

For the 2nd round candidate A's votes are removed and the candidates
ranked behind candidate A "move up" in rank.

2nd Round
Century 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
1st Place B C B B B C
2nd Place C C B B C C C C B B C C B
3rd Place B C B C B B C B B C C C B B C

Candidate C has 10 centuries and is elected
Candidate B has 7 centuries.

That is what happened. If Salix had not received enough Centuries to
be elected on the first round then Marinus would have been dropped and
the candidates behind Marinus would have move up.

You don't know the number of hours that we Rogators spent going over
every ballot with a fine tooth comb and emailing eachother to double
and triple check everything. We went right down to the deadline of
providing results to Consul Labinius and Tribuna Moravia. As a result
of our hard work you come along and start screaming SCAM! Anyone else
besides me sense the taste sour grapes?

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18524 From: sa-mann@libero.it Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: bouncing test
bouncing test sorry
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18525 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
quintuscassiuscalvus wrote:

> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Sicinius Drusus" <drusus@b...>
> wrote:
> > You may be in luck.
> >
> > A vote counting scam that selects a candidate who carrys 5 Centuries
> > over a Candiadte that carries 16 Centuries is causing me to question
> > retaining membership in this organization. You just might be able to
> > turn this organization into the total joke of a "Modern 28th Century
> > Micronation" that has little or nothing to do with Roma, without
> hearing
> > another word from me.
> >
> > Drusus
>
> Salve,
>
> It's obvious that you do not understand what happened nor the law that
> you vocally supported for passage. Allow me to illustrate with an
> example:

I Suported the lex as having more good than bad because of the more
historic voting procedure.

I clearly stated that the vote counting procedure was flawed and stated
my hope that a future law would correct that flaw.

Before we started messing with the laws two years ago we had a system
that didn't produce runoffs or third place candidates "winning".
That was pure and simple, the two candidates recieving the largest
number of Centuries were elected.

Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18526 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations once more :-)
Salvete Quirites! Et salve Scepti,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS wrote:

> I must congratulate the new magistrates elected.

Thank you. And I join you in congratulating all newly elected
magistrates, and in thanking the rogatores for their dedication
and hard work.

> Fabius Quintilianus will do a great job, I'm sure.

As am I. He and Octavius Germanicus will make a great team
this coming year.

> On the other hand, Salix Astur and Equitius Marinus are to
> lead us into a rising of the Res Publica, and therefore I
> applaud them for that.

Thank you for that applause. I join you in recognizing the
promise of next year. Gnaeus Salix Astur is one of my oldest
friends in Nova Roma. He will be a fine, effective leader for
us all. I can not imagine a better colleague. It will be my
great privilege to serve alongside him.

> Praetors and Quaestors will do an excelent job,

Indeed. I'm delighted with Marcus Arminius Maior's impressive
showing, and very pleased to see Gnaeus Octavius Noricus gain
the curule chair and the laticlavial stripe.

> and on the Curule chair, the Aedilis will have a lot of
> job entertaining us and providing with funny games,

I'm confident that Gaius Iulius Scaurus will provide us with
Ludi Romani unlike anything we've ever seen before. I also
look forward to Marcus Iulius Perusianus inventions for his
Ludi. But more importantly, I'm pleased to see these two fine
men taking up the quieter duties of the Curule Aediles. They
will both be good at mediating market misunderstandings should
any arise. As the longest serving Curule Aedile in Nova Roma's
history, I'm pleased to see that I will leave the Collegium
Aedilicum in good, capable hands. Gens Iulia will be proud.

> On the other hand, my congratulations for the rest of the
> elected citizens and a call for those not elected; although
> you don't have an official post, you can help as all the
> citizenry those who are in the chairs, and therefore I hope
> you'll work for them as any other. Only one can be named the
> winner; the Res Publica. :-)

Indeed. We are all in this together, and we all have something
to contribute. That is the way of the Roman Republic. That is
our way ahead.

> vale bene in pace deorum,

Yes. May the peace of the gods be here with us this day, and
all days, giving us the means to make our Republic ever stronger,
ever brighter a beacon to the rest of the world.

On this festival day of Sol Invictus, and in all the days of the
year to come, may the peace of the gods -- the pace deorum -- be
our peace.

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18527 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Salve, Quintus Cassius Calvus; salvete, omnes.

On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 02:20:05PM -0000, quintuscassiuscalvus wrote:
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Sicinius Drusus" <drusus@b...>
> wrote:
> > You may be in luck.
> >
> > A vote counting scam that selects a candidate who carrys 5 Centuries
> > over a Candiadte that carries 16 Centuries is causing me to question
> > retaining membership in this organization. You just might be able to
> > turn this organization into the total joke of a "Modern 28th Century
> > Micronation" that has little or nothing to do with Roma, without
> hearing
> > another word from me.
> >
> > Drusus
>
> Salve,
>
> It's obvious that you do not understand what happened nor the law that
> you vocally supported for passage. Allow me to illustrate with an
> example:
>
> 1st Round
> Century 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
> 1st Place A B A C A A A B A A A B B C A A A
> 2nd Place C A C B B C C A C C B A A B C C B
> 3rd Place B C B A C B B C B B C C C A B B C
>
> 9 Centuries are required to win:
> Candidate A has 11 centuries and is elected.
> Candidate B has 4 Centuries
> Candidate C has 2 Centuries
>
> For the 2nd round candidate A's votes are removed and the candidates
> ranked behind candidate A "move up" in rank.
>
> 2nd Round
> Century 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
> 1st Place B C B B B C
> 2nd Place C C B B C C C C B B C C B
> 3rd Place B C B C B B C B B C C C B B C
>
> Candidate C has 10 centuries and is elected
> Candidate B has 7 centuries.
>
> That is what happened. If Salix had not received enough Centuries to
> be elected on the first round then Marinus would have been dropped and
> the candidates behind Marinus would have move up.
>
> You don't know the number of hours that we Rogators spent going over
> every ballot with a fine tooth comb and emailing eachother to double
> and triple check everything. We went right down to the deadline of
> providing results to Consul Labinius and Tribuna Moravia. As a result
> of our hard work you come along and start screaming SCAM! Anyone else
> besides me sense the taste sour grapes?

I suspect an unwillingness - I won't say "inability" - to understand,
although sour grapes and being a poor loser may well be factors. After
all, it's much easier to cry "scam", even if you voted for the law, than
to try and wade through confusing things like numbers... especially
since the complainant _and_ his political party lost out so badly as a
result of accurately reflecting the will of the people in Nova Roma.

As to the effort put forth by the Rogators, all of you have my most
sincere appreciation and thanks; I am well aware that this method of
calculation calls for more work on your part in exchange for greater
accuracy in representation. In my opinion, this reflects all the greater
credit on your work, and increases your contribution to Nova Roma.

Incidentally, feel free to contact me off-list if you'd like a software
"helper" for calculating the above type of tables (although I realize
that calculation is probably one of the easiest parts, I can't think of
anything that would help tabulation or any other parts of the process.)


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Saepe creat molles aspera spina rosas.
Often the prickly thorn produces tender roses.
-- Ovid
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18528 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations to the new magistrates!
Hadrianus Rutilius Bardulus wrote:

> I want to congratulate to our new elected Magistrates. May the Gods and
> the Goddesses of Rome guide you in your work!

Thank you Bardule. May the Di Immortales hear your prayer, and
grant all of us guidance in the new year. May it be a year in
which the Virtues shine forth among us all, and on which we will
look back with pride.

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18529 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Salvete all,

Congratualations and the best of luck to our new Consules!

I have not been defeated. I have won. My Goddess has chosen to keep me specifically for herself and
that makes the Consulship a poor consolation prize!

I made an offering to Venus Erucina last weekend asking her to guide the hands of the voters (and
the lots) to choose Marinus if she wished to keep me for herself and to focus on building her
worship as Sacerdos Venus. I am not speaking of a 'virtual' offering in a 'virtual' Temple either. I
have a separate room on the top floor of my house which is Venus's Temple. It is used for nothing
else and unbelievers are not allowed in it. I also made an offering to Venus Victrix and without
explanation, one of the candles popped in a very loud way. I understood this to mean that Venus
would have me lose so that I could focus on the Religio this year, which has always been my first
love.

After interaction with citizens such as Cordus, Marinus and Titus Octavius, my eyes have been opened
quite a bit. It has also been implied or directly said that I did not have the appropiate
'character' to be a Consul. I believe that all of those who said that were non-religio people. In
ancient times Venus was honored as a Goddess of love and laughter-- she never had to apologize for
being that way--and as her Priestess I will not. If one needs to present a facade of a sparkless
personality in order to be Consul of this virtual nation then as I say 'good riddance'. The ancient
Romans -my genetic ancestors- were not stuffy which just proves to me how far Nova Roma has to go
before we learn what being a real Roman really is.

My Oath as a Priestess of Venus is one that transcends Nova Roma and is a part of who I am. I am
happy that this year that my time next year will be spent on spiritual matters rather than on
citizens who make virtual Oaths and virtual offerings to our Gods because it is *required* of them
in order to hold office.

Last but not at all least, my thanks to my dear friend Decius Iunius Palladius for all of the hours
that he spent talking with me as only close friends do. I thank our Gods that I met him nearly 5
years ago in NR and that our friendhsip has grown far beyond the borders of this micronation.

I can list about 20 other citizens to thank, but this email has been long enough. They know who they
are and may the Gods continue to bless them!

Valete,
Diana Moravia Aventina
Sacerdos Venus et Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18530 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
L. Sicinius Drusus wrote:

> To Gnaeus Equitius Marinus

Thank you Druse. May the blessings of this festival of
Sol Invictus be with you and yours.

--
Gn. Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18531 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Salve, T. Labienus Fortunatus Consul; salvete, omnes -

On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 11:15:05PM -0600, labienus@... wrote:
> T Labienus Fortunatus Consul Quiritibus SPD
>
> The rogatores have finished tallying the votes, and have reported the results
> to me. Now, all that remains is for me to make those results public.

[ snip ]

My congratulations to all the winners - and to Nova Roma as a whole. We
have elected our "best and brightest", a group of people who are, in my
opinion, the best choices for their respective work and for the job of
promoting the growth of Nova Roma. May the Gods look with favor upon
their endeavors and our future.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Quam bene vivas refert, non quam diu.
The important thing isn't how long you live, but how well you live.
-- Seneca Philosophus, "Epistulae"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18532 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Caius Minucius Scaevola wrote:

>
> I suspect an unwillingness - I won't say "inability" - to understand,
> although sour grapes and being a poor loser may well be factors.

Wrong answer.

It's as simple as having no intrest in wasting my time on an
organization that is showing less and less intrest in Roma to persue
being a "modern nation". I'm allready a citizen of a modern nation who's
government is loosely based on that of Roma. It's called the United
States of America. A Second one is redundant.

Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18533 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Salvete Quirites, et salve Diana,

Diana Moravia Aventina wrote:

> I made an offering to Venus Erucina last weekend asking her
> to guide the hands of the voters (and the lots) to choose Marinus
> if she wished to keep me for herself and to focus on building her
> worship as Sacerdos Venus.

Thank you Diana, and thanks also to Venus for her guidance in this.
It is, it would seem, a very good day for her. She has two Iulii
chosen as next year's Aedilis Curalis, she has helped me to attain
the Consulship, and she has you, her chosen one.

Ave Venus, mother of the Iulii. Thank you for your gifts to us all.

Valete,

--
Gn. Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18534 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Caius Minucius Scaevola wrote:

> My congratulations to all the winners - and to Nova Roma as a whole. We
> have elected our "best and brightest", a group of people who are, in my
> opinion, the best choices for their respective work and for the job of
> promoting the growth of Nova Roma. May the Gods look with favor upon
> their endeavors and our future.

Thank you Cai Minuci. May it be as you wish.

--
Gn. Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18535 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Salve, Sicinius Drusus

Maybe you would like to hear from me (Or some other citizens) those
words of "If you don't like it, go away". Well, you won't hear them
from my own lips. Instead of that, a suggestion.

If the way Nova Roma is on doesn't please you, try to change it. As
I said to other citizens some time ago, leaving is not a solution.
Is the "run away" partial solution. Make the difference. Stay here
and fight reasoning and trying to adapt those things Roma had. We
are Nova Roma, not Roma itself (We some would like it to be true).

I don't think we wan't to make a joke with this. I'm not in luck.
Not any other one. You think it is wrong? Legally the appointed
magistrates are our magistrates, and them are because we accepted
them with the law that we used to vote with. So if you feel the law
is full of flaws, stay here and propose a new one linked as much as
possible to Ancient Rome. It is as simple as working for, not
against.

Sicinius Drusus, I hope you are not dissappointed for not being
elected Tribunus Plebis. If this were your motivation, I don't agree
with your course of action. On the other hand, if it is related to a
flaw you see on the electoral system, suggest a change. Build, not
split. And I hope to hear more words from you, or any other, as far
as they are full of common sense.

vale bene,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Sicinius Drusus" <drusus@b...>
wrote:
> You may be in luck.
>
> A vote counting scam that selects a candidate who carrys 5
Centuries > over a Candiadte that carries 16 Centuries is causing
me to question > retaining membership in this organization. You
just might be able to > turn this organization into the total joke
of a "Modern 28th Century > Micronation" that has little or nothing
to do with Roma, without hearing > another word from me.
>
> Drusus
>
>
> L. Didius Geminus Sceptius wrote:
>
> > Salvete omnes, et tu, Sicinius Drusus
> >
> > It would be a pity to start attacking right from the very
beggining,
> > even before any magistrate makes her/his oath.
> >
> > I would ask you, Sicinius Drusus, to respect those who have been
> > LEGALLY elected as magistrates of our Res Publica. If you are not
> > agree with the system, do not "dwarf" those elected with it, and
try
> > to build, not to split, debating what would be your proposals.
> >
> > As I said before, those who have been not elected can do a lot.
But
> > attacking in such way them is not within the ethics of a Roman
nor
> > the path to improve. Many times I see arguments "Ad Hominem" and
not
> > about the subject itself. I ask all the citizens, and specially
you,
> > Sicinius Drusus, to respect and to build with those elected. Nova
> > Roma is to win, not individuals.
> >
> >
> > vale bene,
> >
> > L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Sicinius Drusus"
<drusus@b...>
> > wrote:
> > > To Gnaeus Equitius Marinus for being SELECTED Consul in a
> > Landslide that
> > > dwarfs the one President Bush won in 2000.
> > >
> > > L. Sicinius Drusus
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *Yahoo! Groups Sponsor*
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> >
<http://rd.yahoo.com/SIG=12cc6ps4o/M=243273.4326031.5516772.1261774/D
=egroupweb/S=1705313712:HM/EXP=1072439607/A=1750744/R=0/*http://serve
dby.advertising.com/click/site=552006/bnum=1072353207688498>
> >
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
-------
> > *Yahoo! Groups Links*
> >
> > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
> >
> > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?
subject=Unsubscribe>
> >
> > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18536 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
I Have been trying to move Nova Roma towards Roma for three years. It is
moving away from Roma not towards it.

I Joined this organization out of a love for Roma, but Roma is getting
pushed aside more and more over a persuit of modernist utopian political
theories that have nothing to do with the reasons I joined this
organization. My intrest in Nova Roma is wanning as Nova Roma's intrest
in Roma declines.

I Have ZERO intrest in a "Modern 21th Century Micronation". If that sort
of thing intrested me I would have joined some organization that was
working towards that goal rather than one that claimed an intrest in Roma.

Drusus

L. Didius Geminus Sceptius wrote:

> Salve, Sicinius Drusus
>
> Maybe you would like to hear from me (Or some other citizens) those
> words of "If you don't like it, go away". Well, you won't hear them
> from my own lips. Instead of that, a suggestion.
>
> If the way Nova Roma is on doesn't please you, try to change it. As
> I said to other citizens some time ago, leaving is not a solution.
> Is the "run away" partial solution. Make the difference. Stay here
> and fight reasoning and trying to adapt those things Roma had. We
> are Nova Roma, not Roma itself (We some would like it to be true).
>
> I don't think we wan't to make a joke with this. I'm not in luck.
> Not any other one. You think it is wrong? Legally the appointed
> magistrates are our magistrates, and them are because we accepted
> them with the law that we used to vote with. So if you feel the law
> is full of flaws, stay here and propose a new one linked as much as
> possible to Ancient Rome. It is as simple as working for, not
> against.
>
> Sicinius Drusus, I hope you are not dissappointed for not being
> elected Tribunus Plebis. If this were your motivation, I don't agree
> with your course of action. On the other hand, if it is related to a
> flaw you see on the electoral system, suggest a change. Build, not
> split. And I hope to hear more words from you, or any other, as far
> as they are full of common sense.
>
> vale bene,
>
> L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Sicinius Drusus" <drusus@b...>
> wrote:
> > You may be in luck.
> >
> > A vote counting scam that selects a candidate who carrys 5
> Centuries > over a Candiadte that carries 16 Centuries is causing
> me to question > retaining membership in this organization. You
> just might be able to > turn this organization into the total joke
> of a "Modern 28th Century > Micronation" that has little or nothing
> to do with Roma, without hearing > another word from me.
> >
> > Drusus
> >
> >
> > L. Didius Geminus Sceptius wrote:
> >
> > > Salvete omnes, et tu, Sicinius Drusus
> > >
> > > It would be a pity to start attacking right from the very
> beggining,
> > > even before any magistrate makes her/his oath.
> > >
> > > I would ask you, Sicinius Drusus, to respect those who have been
> > > LEGALLY elected as magistrates of our Res Publica. If you are not
> > > agree with the system, do not "dwarf" those elected with it, and
> try
> > > to build, not to split, debating what would be your proposals.
> > >
> > > As I said before, those who have been not elected can do a lot.
> But
> > > attacking in such way them is not within the ethics of a Roman
> nor
> > > the path to improve. Many times I see arguments "Ad Hominem" and
> not
> > > about the subject itself. I ask all the citizens, and specially
> you,
> > > Sicinius Drusus, to respect and to build with those elected. Nova
> > > Roma is to win, not individuals.
> > >
> > >
> > > vale bene,
> > >
> > > L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Sicinius Drusus"
> <drusus@b...>
> > > wrote:
> > > > To Gnaeus Equitius Marinus for being SELECTED Consul in a
> > > Landslide that
> > > > dwarfs the one President Bush won in 2000.
> > > >
> > > > L. Sicinius Drusus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *Yahoo! Groups Sponsor*
> > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > >
> <http://rd.yahoo.com/SIG=12cc6ps4o/M=243273.4326031.5516772.1261774/D
> =egroupweb/S=1705313712:HM/EXP=1072439607/A=1750744/R=0/*http://serve
> dby.advertising.com/click/site=552006/bnum=1072353207688498>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> > > *Yahoo! Groups Links*
> > >
> > > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
> > >
> > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?
> subject=Unsubscribe>
> > >
> > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Yahoo! Groups Links*
>
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18537 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Election Results
Salvete omnes!

I wish to express my congratualtions to all our new magistrates. I
know we have some great talent here and I am looking forward to
seeing our Res Republica flourish this next year. I also I wish to
thank all the other candidates who took the trouble to run in this
election; you are all winners too, your names will not be forgotten
and I know future positions and successes await you!

Have a great remaining festive season.


Valete bene,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18538 From: sa-mann@libero.it Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: bouncing test
bouncing test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18539 From: Livia Cornelia Hibernia Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Salve Geminus Sceptius

Very well said. There is good and bad both to this Lex as there is
most leges. It would be very difficult to find a law anywhere,
whether it be Nova Roma or any of the world's macronations that is
not flawed in some way or does not have opponents.

When I first became a Citizen, it was at the end of January and there
were still round after round of elections going on because no
candidate was winning the required number of centuries. If there was
a seeming joke, that was it (note I say "seeming", not actual).

I began to wonder, "can't these people make up thier minds?". With
this system, with all its faults and successes, we at least the
selection of magistrates for the next year before that year's first
quarter is over!

If there is a better way, please, Sicinius Drusus, suggest it. Draft
the lex to implement it and let's let the Citizens of Nova Roma vote
on it.

Vale,
Livia Cornelia Hibernia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Didius Geminus Sceptius"
<sceptia@y...> wrote:
> Salve, Sicinius Drusus
>
> Maybe you would like to hear from me (Or some other citizens) those
> words of "If you don't like it, go away". Well, you won't hear them
> from my own lips. Instead of that, a suggestion.
>
> If the way Nova Roma is on doesn't please you, try to change it. As
> I said to other citizens some time ago, leaving is not a solution.
> Is the "run away" partial solution. Make the difference. Stay here
> and fight reasoning and trying to adapt those things Roma had. We
> are Nova Roma, not Roma itself (We some would like it to be true).
>
> I don't think we wan't to make a joke with this. I'm not in luck.
> Not any other one. You think it is wrong? Legally the appointed
> magistrates are our magistrates, and them are because we accepted
> them with the law that we used to vote with. So if you feel the law
> is full of flaws, stay here and propose a new one linked as much as
> possible to Ancient Rome. It is as simple as working for, not
> against.
>
> Sicinius Drusus, I hope you are not dissappointed for not being
> elected Tribunus Plebis. If this were your motivation, I don't
agree
> with your course of action. On the other hand, if it is related to
a
> flaw you see on the electoral system, suggest a change. Build, not
> split. And I hope to hear more words from you, or any other, as far
> as they are full of common sense.
>
> vale bene,
>
> L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Sicinius Drusus"
<drusus@b...>
> wrote:
> > You may be in luck.
> >
> > A vote counting scam that selects a candidate who carrys 5
> Centuries > over a Candiadte that carries 16 Centuries is causing
> me to question > retaining membership in this organization. You
> just might be able to > turn this organization into the total joke
> of a "Modern 28th Century > Micronation" that has little or
nothing
> to do with Roma, without hearing > another word from me.
> >
> > Drusus
> >
> >
> > L. Didius Geminus Sceptius wrote:
> >
> > > Salvete omnes, et tu, Sicinius Drusus
> > >
> > > It would be a pity to start attacking right from the very
> beggining,
> > > even before any magistrate makes her/his oath.
> > >
> > > I would ask you, Sicinius Drusus, to respect those who have been
> > > LEGALLY elected as magistrates of our Res Publica. If you are
not
> > > agree with the system, do not "dwarf" those elected with it,
and
> try
> > > to build, not to split, debating what would be your proposals.
> > >
> > > As I said before, those who have been not elected can do a lot.
> But
> > > attacking in such way them is not within the ethics of a Roman
> nor
> > > the path to improve. Many times I see arguments "Ad Hominem"
and
> not
> > > about the subject itself. I ask all the citizens, and specially
> you,
> > > Sicinius Drusus, to respect and to build with those elected.
Nova
> > > Roma is to win, not individuals.
> > >
> > >
> > > vale bene,
> > >
> > > L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Sicinius Drusus"
> <drusus@b...>
> > > wrote:
> > > > To Gnaeus Equitius Marinus for being SELECTED Consul in a
> > > Landslide that
> > > > dwarfs the one President Bush won in 2000.
> > > >
> > > > L. Sicinius Drusus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *Yahoo! Groups Sponsor*
> > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > >
>
<http://rd.yahoo.com/SIG=12cc6ps4o/M=243273.4326031.5516772.1261774/D
>
=egroupweb/S=1705313712:HM/EXP=1072439607/A=1750744/R=0/*http://serve
> dby.advertising.com/click/site=552006/bnum=1072353207688498>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
-
> -------
> > > *Yahoo! Groups Links*
> > >
> > > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
> > >
> > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?
> subject=Unsubscribe>
> > >
> > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of
> > > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18540 From: rory12001 Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations once more :-)
Salvete Quirites;
Scepticus put it best & eloquently, stating all our hopes and joy
for Nova Roma.
& I would just like to add I was one of those too-hasty voters,
but I made sure to return the 17th and revote in the Comitia
Centuriata & very happy indeed with the results. O Censor, Consules,
Aediles, have faith in the Res Publica and we are behind you.
Am looking forward to our Ludii!!
vale bene in pace deorum,
Pomponia Fabia Vera
>
>
> vale bene in pace deorum,
>
> L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
> TRIBVNVS·PLEBIS
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18541 From: James Lee Mathews Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Elections
Honored Citizens of Nova Roma, and the new Magistraes - Elect.

My congratulations to you all. I am pleased with the results of the election,ad now we must turn our combined efforts to the tasks in the year ahead.

My thanks to the Citizens of Nova Roma who have chosen to return me to the position of Curator Differum. It is a much different "Eagle" now than it was when I held this position previously and the staff of the "Eagle" and myself have a task of some moment before us.

I would ask that the lovely and vivacious Mistress Monrovia would grant me a favor. Would she relay my thanks to the Goddess Venus in the most humble possible way, that the Goddess has kept for herelf such a Priestess that brins to the world of men so many of the attributes of the Goddess Venus, and at the same time grants Nova Roma an energetic and extremely wise and experienced Consul in Gnaeus Equitus Marinus. Her obvious wishes have provided a Consular Team whih will be able to work closely together to each other's benefit and more importantly fo the benefit of Nova Roma.

While I am a Christain inbelief, I am not blind to the Gods of Rome and what they have wrought through the inspiration and efforts of mankind. I stand in great respect of them, and am humbled by my lack of understanding of how the beliefs and honors of our mutual religious and moral views can be so easily intertwined.

Very Respectfully;

Marcus Minucius Audens
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18542 From: Stefn_Ullarsson Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Venator scripsit: Greetings, musings and re: Election results
Avete Omnes,

Today is a beautiful, cold, sunny day here in northern Illinois, USA.

Around the world, many Faithful are holding religious celebrations
within their Faithway.

I wish a joyous time of Celebration to all and may the turning of the
year bring Blessings on thy Hearth and Family.

It's so wonderful to see an election go as smoothly as this one seemed to...

I wish to present my congratulations to the new magistrates.

I also wish to offer my thanks to those others who contended.

The vast majority of the constitutional offices are filled, in a
(relatively ,-) peaceful manner.

Was the system of election fully neat and tidy? No, any human endevour
has some ragged edges.

Will there be those fully satisied? Most assuredly.

Will there be those dissatisfied? Just as likely.

Will the question of trueness to Rome be raised? Always, it seems.

The Rome that was, is gone and never shall be again. In some ways this
is good, in many ways, sad. We can only but try and build anew, keeping
in mind that which is best and brightest within the Ideal of Roman Genius.

I've been with Nova Roma since shortly after the Founding, Cives number
78, being granted citizenship on I Kalends July 2751 AUC / 1998 CE. My
Gens was originally of the Plebian Class, and by virtue of the small
services I rendered our young Nation, we were raised to the Patrician Class.

I have a hard copy of the complete Nova Roma site from the 26th of July,
1998. We had 85 Cives on that day (probably some Socii as well, but
they were not separated out then).

Today we have 1063 Cives and 1044 Socii, a 20 fold increase in a little
over 5 years.

Our Patrician Gens at that time: Aelia, Ambrosia, Antonia, Aurelia,
Cassia, Claudia, Cordia, Cornelia, Drusia, Equitia, Flavia, Germanica,
Gladia, Hadriana, Iulia, Iunia, Leonina, Luciania, Maria, Nigeria,
Octavia, Planicolia, Poppaea, Portia, Silvania, Trentia, Titia, Vedia
and Vellia

Our Plebians: Anncina, Aquila, Avitablia, Caecilia Metella, Claudia
Lucentia, Claudia Secunda, Hyeania, Labiena, Libertania, Lupinia,
Magius, Messalina, Olivaria, Pulchria, Septimia, Sergia, Servia, Sestia,
Tullia, Ulleria, Valeria and Victoria.

The ranks of these have thinned a bit over the years; some have absented
themselves purposefully, some have merely neglected to maintain interest
or contact, some have leftquietly, some have left discordantly...

Many, many others have come in the gates (some of which are Romans
returning from their "travels").

I can only but hope that one and all are in accord on one salient point,
we are here to build.

A few sesterces...

I've not had the resources in time, health or wealth to be active the
past year or so. I am thinking the new year will bring good changes for
me and mine.

--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.

In amicus sub fidelis
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Cives et Paterfamilias
Religio Septentrionalis - Poet

Living a worthy life need not be complicated at all.
Honor the Holy Powers in word and deed.
Honor your Family and Forebears.
Give heed to knowledge and skill.
Attempt to do that which is Right;
with Wisdom, Generosity and Personal Honor.
Read, Write, Love, Laugh, Hate, Cry, Cook, Build,
Sit quietly with family enjoying the birds flying by;
just be the best of that for which you are capable as a Man.
Remember that everything you do adds to the weight of your Past,
for Good or Ill. - Venii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18543 From: Decimus Iunius Silanus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Congratulations
Salvete,

Congratulations to Nova Roma on a most excellent slate
of elected candidates. Our republic will be extremely
well served next year I'm sure.

Valete

Decimus Iunius Silanus

________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18544 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Congratulations on your election!!!
Salve Marcus Minucius Audens Curator Differum-elect

Congratulations on your election!!! I wish for you and your Eagle staff the most successful year ever.

How is the web site coming along? I can't wait to see it.


Best of luck in the coming year.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Curator Differum 2756





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18545 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: The Elections
Cn. Salix Astur Quiritibus S.P.D.

Cives:

I would like to thank all those who have congratulated me on the
results of the elections and to all those who have supported me
during this election with words of encouragement, wise advice or
kindness and love. Gratias plurimas vobis ago, amici.

I would also like to congratulate the future magistrates of our Res
Publica. I am sure that they will do an excellent work. They are just
what Nova Roma needs in the next year.

I would like to thank all the candidates to the elections. Whether
you have been elected or not, your willingness to serve our Res
Publica is most commendable.

Finally, I would like to thank the most important element of this
equation; those citizens that decided to vote. *You* are the ones
that constitue Nova Roma's soul, you are the sole reason for its
existence.

I have been blessed with the opportunity to serve you. That has been
your will. I now promise to do my best.

Thank you once more.

S.V.B.E.E.V.
CN.SALIX.T.F.A.NEP.OVF.ASTVR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18546 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Livia Cornelia Hibernia wrote:
| If there is a better way, please, Sicinius Drusus, suggest
| it. Draft the lex to implement it and let's let the
| Citizens of Nova Roma vote on it.

Salve, Livia Cornelia Hibernia.

Actually, he can't do that. He'd have to be a magistrate with the
ability to summon one of the assemblies (in this case, the comitia
centuriata) in order to promulgate a new lex. Senator Drusus, however,
isn't an elected magistrate, nor has he ever been elected by the people
for any position, in spite of two attempts for tribune and one for
praetor. He has tried that route, and it's just not working for him.

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/60C6AGtgaSonkUoRAsyJAJ4r+hYQWTYGz5rf5xM/TYLw3MbZWwCfekE/
7+ajq7XC49sV5vXrP6due1k=
=EAco
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18547 From: Livia Cornelia Hibernia Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Salve Titus Octavius

That is, of course, true. However, a Citizen may still offer
suggestions and advice to magistrates, that is why I said that he
should "suggest" it rather than submit it. I should think that a well
drafted lex that clears up a controversial area of our political
process would be welcomed by at least one magistrate.

Vale,
Livia Cornelia Hibernia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Kristoffer From <from@d...> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Livia Cornelia Hibernia wrote:
> | If there is a better way, please, Sicinius Drusus, suggest
> | it. Draft the lex to implement it and let's let the
> | Citizens of Nova Roma vote on it.
>
> Salve, Livia Cornelia Hibernia.
>
> Actually, he can't do that. He'd have to be a magistrate with the
> ability to summon one of the assemblies (in this case, the comitia
> centuriata) in order to promulgate a new lex. Senator Drusus,
however,
> isn't an elected magistrate, nor has he ever been elected by the
people
> for any position, in spite of two attempts for tribune and one for
> praetor. He has tried that route, and it's just not working for him.
>
> Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQE/60C6AGtgaSonkUoRAsyJAJ4r+hYQWTYGz5rf5xM/TYLw3MbZWwCfekE/
> 7+ajq7XC49sV5vXrP6due1k=
> =EAco
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18548 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
> Thank you Diana, and thanks also to Venus for her guidance in this.
> It is, it would seem, a very good day for her. She has two Iulii
> chosen as next year's Aedilis Curalis, she has helped me to attain
> the Consulship, and she has you, her chosen one.
>
> Ave Venus, mother of the Iulii. Thank you for your gifts to us all.

Thank you for proving my point. You publicly thank a Goddess whom you don't believe in to make
yourself look pius in public as part of the 'I am the future Consul act so I'll make believe that I
believe in the Gods so to throw the Collegium Pontificium a bone'.

Once again, lip service and virtual words to someone you believe is a virtual Goddess.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18549 From: Minerva Thalía Juno Vanegas Farfano Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: SENATO POPVLOQVE NOVAROMAE S.P.D.
SOPHIA IULIA LIVILLA SENATO POPVLOQVE NOVAROMAE S.P.D.

Ego, Sophia Iulia Livilla (Minerva Thalia Juno Vanegas Farfano) hoc ipso
facto
sollemniter IVRO Novae Romae decus defendere et semper pro Novae
Romae Populo atque Senatu agere. Ut Novae Romae magistratus ego
Sophia Iulia Livilla (Minerva T. Juno Vanegas Farfano) Romae
deos deasque colere IVRO in omnibus publicae vitae temporibus atque
Romanas virtutes et publica et privata vita persequi.

Ego, Sophia Iulia Livilla (Minerva Thalia Juno Vanegas Farfano)
Romanam religionem favere et defendere IVRO ut Novae Romae
Reipublicae religionem et numquam agere ita ut eius status publicae
religionis aliquid detrimenti capiat. Praeterea ego, Sophia Iulia Livilla
(Minerva Thalia Juno Vanegas Farfano) IVRO quam optime fungi officium
muneris Scriba Propraetoris Mexicaniae.

Meo Novae Romae civis honore et coram Populi Romani deis atque
deabus et eorum voluntate et favore, munus Scriba Propraetoris Mexicaniae
ACCIPIO una cum iuribus, privilegiis. munera atque officia
quae meum munus comportat.

In Mexico Provincia A.D. XIV kalendas Ianuariis annun MMDCCLVI a.u.c.
Consulii: Caeso Fabius Quintillanus,
Titus Labienus Fortunatus
----------------------------------------


I, Sophia Iulia Livilla (Minerva Thalia Juno Vanegas Farfano) do
hereby solemnly swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act
always in the best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova
Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Sophia Iulia Livilla (Minerva Thalia Juno
Vanegas Farfano)
swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of
Rome in my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my
public and private life.

I, Sophia Iulia Livilla (Minerva Thalia Juno Vanegas Farfano)) swear
to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of
Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten its
status as the State Religion.

I, Sophia Iulia Livilla (Minerva Thalia Juno Vanegas Farfano) swear
to protect and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Sophia Iulia Livilla (Minerva Thalia Juno Vanegas Farfano)
further swear to fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the
office of Scriba Propraetoris Mexicaniae to the best of my
abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the
Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor,
do I accept the position of Scriba Propraetoris Mexicaniae and all the
rights, privileges, obligations,and responsibilities attendant
thereto.

In Mexico Provincia, Novaroma, A.D. XIV kalendas Ianuariis annun MMDCCLVI
a.u.c.
Sophia Iulia Livilla (Minerva Thalia Juno Vanegas Farfano)
Mexico Provincia.
Consuls: Caeso Fabius Quintillanus,
Titus Labienus Fortunatus

------------------------------------------


Yo, Sophia Iulia Livilla (Minerva Thalia Juno Vanegas Farfano) por
la presente JURO solemnemente defender el honor de Nova Roma, y
actuar siempre por los intereses de la gente y el Senado de Nova
Roma.
Como magistrado de Nova Roma, yo, Sophia Iulia Livilla (Minerva Thalia Juno
Vanegas Farfano) JURO honrar a los Dioses y las Diosas de
Roma en mis actos públicos, y perseguir las Virtudes Romanas en mi
vida pública y privada.

Yo, Sophia Iulia Livilla (Minerva Thalia Juno Vanegas Farfano),
JURO mantener y defender la Religio Romana así como la Religión del
Estado de Nova Roma y JURO nunca actuar de una manera que amenazaría
su condición de Religión del Estado.
Yo, Sophia Iulia Livilla (Minerva Thalia Juno Vanegas Farfano) JURO
proteger y defender la Constitución de Nova Roma.
Yo, Sophia Iulia Livilla (Minerva Thalia Juno Vanegas Farfano) además JURO
cumplir las obligaciones y responsabilidades del cargo de Scriba
Propraetoris Mexicaniae al máximo de mis capacidades.

Para mi honor como Ciudadano de Nova Roma, y en presencia de los
Dioses y las Diosas de la gente Romana y por su voluntad y favor,
ACEPTO el puesto de Scriba Propraetoris Mexicaniae todos los derechos,
privilegios, obligaciones y responsabilidades que el cargo comporta.

Sophia Iulia Livilla (Minerva Talía Juno Vanegas Farfano)

En la Provincia novorromana de Mexico A.D XIV kalendas Ianuariis annun
MMDCCLVI a.u.c..
Cónsules: Caeso Fabius Quintillanus
Titus Labienus Fortunatus

_________________________________________________________________
Charla con tus amigos en línea mediante MSN Messenger:
http://messenger.microsoft.com/es
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18550 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Salve Labienus,

First round:

<Diana Moravia Aventina: 16 Centuries
<Gnaeus Equitius Marinus: 5 Centuries

<In the second round, 49 Centuries cast ballots; 26 were required for election:

<Gnaeus Equitius Marinus: 25 Centuries
<Diana Moravia Aventina: 24 Centuries

Am I correct when reading the above that I won 40 centuries and Marinus only 30 and yet I have lost?

Can someone explain in detail how I lost? It is really not clear to me. From what I can see, I
received a lot more votes than Marinus in the first round and only 1 less in the second round and
yet I lost. I am beginning to feel like Al Gore.

I am not at all questioning the accuracy of the results or the hard work of the Rogatores, but
looking at these results I can't help but wonder if there is a mistake.

Vale,
Diana Moravia Aventina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18551 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: A wonderful year
AVETE OMNES

Many congratulations to all the newly elected magistrates! I see we
are having a wonderful year for Nova Roma!!!

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18552 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: A wonderful year
Salvete all,

I would just like everyone to know that I have asked the Rogatores and Consul Labienus Fortunatus
for a recount of the Consular election.

I think that our Rogatores worked extremely hard (and during their Christmas holiday too) and have
done a great job. But since I won by 11 centuries in round one and then *lost the election* by one
century in round two (which could have been only one vote) a recount is worth doing. I am indeed
feeling like Al Gore :-)

But if the rogatores re-do their tally and the numbers come up the same-- that I lost the election
by one vote in round two-- then so be it. If we had used the old system from what I can see, I would
be the Consular elect for 2757 and not Marinus. But since I was one of the citizens who voted for
this new voting system that is neither here nor there.

Valete,
Diana Moravia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18553 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: A wonderful year
Manius Constantinus Serapio wrote:

> Many congratulations to all the newly elected magistrates! I see we
> are having a wonderful year for Nova Roma!!!

Thank you Serapio. There is indeed great promise for the new year,
and this current year has seen its share of accomplishments under
the leadership of Quintilianus and Fortunatus.

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18554 From: rory12001 Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
> Diana, I suggest you read J. Scheid's Roman Religion
& come on over to the Religio Book Group.
The Gods love Marinus's public actions & words, it makes no
difference to the Religio if he believes them or not. That is a basic
premise of Roman religion that you seem to be unaware of.

If Nova Roma were entirely filled with Christians who performed the
proper rituals & sacrifices they could bring back the Pax Deorum,
buy the book and may I suggest you sacrifice to the Goddess
Concordia?
vale Pomponia Fabia Vera

>

Thank you for proving my point. You publicly thank a Goddess whom you
don't believe in to make
> yourself look pius in public as part of the 'I am the future Consul
act so I'll make believe that I
> believe in the Gods so to throw the Collegium Pontificium a bone'.
>
> Once again, lip service and virtual words to someone you believe is
a virtual Goddess.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18555 From: Sp. Postumius Tubertus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Election Results: Comitia Centuriata
Sp. Postumius Tubertus Omnibus sal.

Si tu vales, benest.

Seeing the confusion the new voting system is causing, let me try to give a better explanation. (I apologize if this confuses anyone further)

In this past election for Consul, Cn. Salix won more than half (28, specifically) of the 49 voting centuries. Cn. Equitius won 5 centuries, whereas Diana Moravia won 16. Salix having more than half, he was elected Consul.

In the second round, the 28 centuries who voted for Salix were distributed to their second choice candidates, whereas those who had Marinus or Aventina as first choices retained that vote. To look at the mathematics behind it, Marinus was the second choice of 20 of the 28 centuries voting for Salix, whereas Aventina was the second choice in only 8. Adding these numbers to the original first choice centuries of Marinus and Aventina, Marinus won 25 centuries, and Aventina won 24.

Because the law requires that a candidate be eliminated in each round, Aventina was eliminated by not having the fewest centuries, and because neither candidate had enough centuries for election.

Marinus being the only remaining candidate in the final round, he was elected Consul by default, and by being the first choice in 5 centuries, the second choice in 20 centuries, and third choice in 24. Needless to say, Aventina, then, would have been the first choice in 16, second in 8, and third in 25.

In any case, I hope this helps understand how things turned out the way they did.

Optime Valete,

Spurius Postumius Tubertus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18556 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Congratulations, Thanks, and a Brief Absence
G. Iulius Scaurus S. P. D.

Salvete, Quirites.

I would like to congratulate all the candidates who have prevailed and
are preparing to shoulder the responsibilities for next year's
governance, most particularly my dear friend Gn. Salix and my
colleague M. Iulius.

I would like also to thank those citizens who supported my candidacy
for Aedilis Curulis, and even more so to thank those citizens whose
sense of duty and patriotism led them to enter the political fray, but
on whose candidacies Fortuna did not this time smile -- we need such
citizens who are willing to speak their minds and submit to the
electoral process, since no republic can long perservere without a
vigorous political contest.

I shall be away until late on Dec. 30, visiting my family. I shall
have internet access there, but I may be a bit tardy in responding to
email and beg pardon of those to whom I do not respond immediately.

Valete.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18557 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Election Results: Comitia Centuriata
> Marinus being the only remaining candidate in the final round, he was elected Consul by default,
and by being the first choice in 5 centuries, the second choice in 20 centuries, and third choice in
24. Needless to say, Aventina, then, would have been the first choice in 16, second in 8, and third
in 25.

Thank you Tubertus! That was a very clear explanation.

So then:
28 centuries chose Salix as their first choice
16 centuries chose me as their first choice, 8 chose me as their second choice.
5 centuries chose Marinus as their first choice, 20 chose him as their second choice

Can someone please explain to me how even after testing and being told how correct and efficient
this new system was, how the people's second choice for Consul (me) has lost and the people's third
choice is now Consul-elect? This seems to be quite a flaw in the electoral system.

Valete,
Diana Moravia Aventina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18558 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Ophthamology in Ancient Rome
G. Iulius Scaurus S. P. D.

Salvete, Quirites.

Here's a link to "Ophthamology in Ancient Rome":

http://www.unich.it/injo/297.htm

This article by Drs. L. Capasso and R. Mariani Costantini, originally
appeared in the _Internet Journal of Ophthamology_ 2 (1997), 1-8.

Since travel can be an unpredictable thing, I offer also the link for
Friday in advance, "Rome -- Engineering and Industry":

http://www.novanet.it/com/personale/togliard/nemi/nindex_e.htm

This site provides excerpts from the volume "Rome: Engineering and
Industry" by Profs. Enzo Fabio and Luca Fassitelli. The site is
available in English and Italian.

Valete.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18559 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: A wonderful year
Salvete omnes
Salva sis Diana

Given the closenes of the tally, a recount seems perfectly reasonable under the circumstances, I believe.

Valete
~ Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus

-----Original Message-----
From: Diana Moravia Aventina <diana@...>
Sent: Dec 25, 2003 4:47 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] A wonderful year

Salvete all,

I would just like everyone to know that I have asked the Rogatores and Consul Labienus Fortunatus
for a recount of the Consular election.

I think that our Rogatores worked extremely hard (and during their Christmas holiday too) and have
done a great job. But since I won by 11 centuries in round one and then *lost the election* by one
century in round two (which could have been only one vote) a recount is worth doing. I am indeed
feeling like Al Gore :-)

But if the rogatores re-do their tally and the numbers come up the same-- that I lost the election
by one vote in round two-- then so be it. If we had used the old system from what I can see, I would
be the Consular elect for 2757 and not Marinus. But since I was one of the citizens who voted for
this new voting system that is neither here nor there.

Valete,
Diana Moravia



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com




Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18560 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Salvete

Very unloving words from one who honours Venus.

As for Marinus' beliefs, it is my belief that while he is not a Religio practitioner he does respect the Religio and the Immortal Gods, but this is just a personal opinion - I would not presume to be able to look into his soul for the actuality, as some others apparently believe they can.

As for the Virtual This, Virtual That - give it a rest Diana! Yours was a Virtual statement, as is my reply: We have little choice but to use this medium until actual communities can be formed, which realistically may take a generation or two.

When someone commits their Oath to writing, I am willing to accept it as genuine until proven otherwise, regardless of the medium used for the writing: Sending over the internet does not make an Oath any less binding - it makes it more so, as there are more Witnesses and an Archive. To call someone's sworn oath "Virtual" just because of the medium used is a grotesque insult to everyone who communicates in this Virtual Forum! Our communication is very real, and so are the Oaths!

Valete
~ Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus

-----Original Message-----
From: Diana Moravia Aventina <diana@...>
Sent: Dec 25, 2003 3:58 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus

> Thank you Diana, and thanks also to Venus for her guidance in this.
> It is, it would seem, a very good day for her. She has two Iulii
> chosen as next year's Aedilis Curalis, she has helped me to attain
> the Consulship, and she has you, her chosen one.
>
> Ave Venus, mother of the Iulii. Thank you for your gifts to us all.

Thank you for proving my point. You publicly thank a Goddess whom you don't believe in to make
yourself look pius in public as part of the 'I am the future Consul act so I'll make believe that I
believe in the Gods so to throw the Collegium Pontificium a bone'.

Once again, lip service and virtual words to someone you believe is a virtual Goddess.


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18561 From: Dennis and Louise Cantrell Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Official Results in the Comitia Plebis Tributa!
Salve!

Si vales, valeo!

Congratulations to all who have won, and special congratulations to Gaius Modius Athansius.

Julia Modia

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18562 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Livia Cornelia Hibernia wrote:

> Salve Geminus Sceptius
>
> Very well said. There is good and bad both to this Lex as there is
> most leges. It would be very difficult to find a law anywhere,
> whether it be Nova Roma or any of the world's macronations that is
> not flawed in some way or does not have opponents.
>
> When I first became a Citizen, it was at the end of January and there
> were still round after round of elections going on because no
> candidate was winning the required number of centuries. If there was
> a seeming joke, that was it (note I say "seeming", not actual).
>
> I began to wonder, "can't these people make up thier minds?". With
> this system, with all its faults and successes, we at least the
> selection of magistrates for the next year before that year's first
> quarter is over!
>
> If there is a better way, please, Sicinius Drusus, suggest it. Draft
> the lex to implement it and let's let the Citizens of Nova Roma vote
> on it.
>
> Vale,
> Livia Cornelia Hibernia

Sorry I studided Roman goverment and history, a subject that isn't very
important in Nova Roma. I'm not an expert on voting systems for modern
21st century micronations, you'll need to contact someone who is into
role playing games for advice on that.

Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18563 From: rory12001 Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
What you and our priestess of Venus seemed not to have studied is -
good sportsmanship; both of you reek of the bitterness of sore
losers & it is profoundly unattractive.
vale Pomponia Fabia Vera

>
Sorry I studided Roman goverment and history, a subject that isn't
very
> important in Nova Roma. I'm not an expert on voting systems for
modern
> 21st century micronations, you'll need to contact someone who is
into
> role playing games for advice on that.
>
> Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18564 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Salve Pomponia Fabia Vera;

I agree with you. Within the Religio it is about Orthopraxy, that is doing the rituals correctly. Belief is not paramount as action is. However...Christianity does not teach this. It is not acceptable for a Christian to "believe" in the existance of other Gods. Additionally, would Consul-elect Marinus be willing to sacrifice a bull (or other animal) to the Gods as the Consuls of antiqua would have done as part of their magisterial responsibility? Would the pastor of his Church find this OK?

Its not acceptable, in my eyes, for someone who is not a follower of the Religio to play "lip service" to the Gods as if they were a believer on this mailing list. If Marinus truly believes that Venus helped him win the election then I would EXPECT him to make a physical (not virtual) offering to her in thanks for such a blessing.

Nova Roma is NOT a Role-playing game. I, Gaius Modius Athansius, make offerings to the Gods for the wellbring of the People and Senate of Nova Roma. And while I, Gaius Modius Athanasius, am making said offerings...David Oliver Kling, Jr (citizen of the United States of America) is also making offerings to the Gods for the wellbeing of the Peole and Senate of Nova Roma. I do nothing as Gaius Modius that I would not also do as David Kling. The two are the same, within Nova Roma David Kling just happens to be the name I was born with. Gaius Modius Athanasius is the names the Gods know me as, for They and I belong to the same community.

Since Marinus gladly accepts that Venus helped him get elected I expect him to put on his toga praetexta, cover his head like a good Roman, and make an offering of gratitude to Venus. I didn't see Her subscribed to this e-mail list, and I want to make sure She knows he is thankful. To do otherwise is a mockery of the Gods.

Valete;

Gaius Modius Athansius
Flamen Pomonalis

In a message dated 12/25/2003 7:52:39 PM Eastern Standard Time, rory12001@... writes:

> The Gods love Marinus's public actions & words, it makes no
> difference to the Religio if he believes them or not. That is a basic
> premise of Roman religion that you seem to be unaware of.
>
> If Nova Roma were entirely filled with Christians who performed the
> proper rituals & sacrifices they could bring back the Pax Deorum,
> buy the book and may I suggest you sacrifice to the
> Goddess
> Concordia?
> vale Pomponia Fabia Vera
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18565 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-25
Subject: Re: Congratulations
LOL,
No I'm being realistic. I Have offered advice and it has been rejected
in favor of a modern 21st century micronation. If you decide you want a
Roman system instead of a modern system give me a call. If you want a
modern 21st century micronation I have no intrest in that subject, so
you'll have to seek advice from people who care enough about it to study
it. Most Micronations are role playing games so gamers are the people
who are most likely to have the knowledge you need.

Drusus

rory12001 wrote:

> What you and our priestess of Venus seemed not to have studied is -
> good sportsmanship; both of you reek of the bitterness of sore
> losers & it is profoundly unattractive.
> vale Pomponia Fabia Vera
>
> >
> Sorry I studided Roman goverment and history, a subject that isn't
> very
> > important in Nova Roma. I'm not an expert on voting systems for
> modern
> > 21st century micronations, you'll need to contact someone who is
> into
> > role playing games for advice on that.
> >
> > Drusus
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Yahoo! Groups Links*
>
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18566 From: deciusiunius Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Test
Salvete,

Testing to see if messages are getting through. None have posted for
three hours and we are receiving inquiries.

Valete,

Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus,
Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18567 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Test
Salvete,

Test........



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "deciusiunius" <bcatfd@t...> wrote:
>
> Salvete,
>
> Testing to see if messages are getting through. None have posted
for
> three hours and we are receiving inquiries.
>
> Valete,
>
> Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus,
> Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18568 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Test
Salvete,

OK on this end; message went instantly.

Quintus Lanius Paulinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
> Salvete,
>
> Test........
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "deciusiunius" <bcatfd@t...>
wrote:
> >
> > Salvete,
> >
> > Testing to see if messages are getting through. None have posted
> for
> > three hours and we are receiving inquiries.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus,
> > Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18569 From: deciusiunius Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Congratulations to all magistrates-elect
Salvete,

My congratulations to all magistrates-elect! It was a hard won
election; all candidates, winners and losers showed honor and
fortitude. I won't lie and say I am entirely happy with the results
but the people have spoken. Magistrates-elect, make every effort over
the coming year to be worthy of the trust given to you.

Foremost of all, a special congratulations to Gnaeus Salix Astur! You
will make an excellent consul my friend and colleague. Serving with
you has been a pleasure I did not expect at the end of our series of
runoffs last year.

Gaius Iulius Scaurus, I look forward to seeing you and your colleague
make the office of Curule Aedile shine as it never has before.

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus, I would have voted for you if I could but
alas the price of blue blood. ;-) I'm looking forward to sharing food
and wine with you again at Roman Days.

Caius Fabius Quintilianus my friend, it was a close election and as
you know, I did not vote for you but I wish you well as censor. I am
sure you will make an excellent colleague to Marcus Octavius.
Continue to try to reach across the partisan divide as you have this
year.

Valete,

Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18570 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Salve G. Modius,

> Nova Roma is NOT a Role-playing game. I, Gaius Modius Athansius, make offerings to the Gods for
the wellbring of the People and Senate of Nova Roma. And while I, Gaius Modius Athanasius, am
making said offerings...David Oliver Kling, Jr (citizen of the United States of America) is also
making offerings to the Gods for the wellbeing of the Peole and Senate of Nova Roma. I do nothing
as Gaius Modius that I would not also do as David Kling. The two are the same, within Nova Roma
David Kling just happens to be the name I was born with. Gaius Modius Athanasius is the names the
Gods know me as, for They and I belong to the same community.

> Since Marinus gladly accepts that Venus helped him get elected I expect him to put on his toga
praetexta, cover his head like a good Roman, and make an offering of gratitude to Venus. I didn't
see Her subscribed to this e-mail list, and I want to make sure She knows he is thankful. To do
otherwise is a mockery of the Gods.

Thank you for saying exactly what I meant in a more eloquent manner.
Vale,
Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18571 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Congratulations to all magistrates-elect
Salve Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus

Thanks and I too am looking forward to Roman Days.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: deciusiunius
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 2:03 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Congratulations to all magistrates-elect



Salvete,

My congratulations to all magistrates-elect! It was a hard won
election; all candidates, winners and losers showed honor and
fortitude. I won't lie and say I am entirely happy with the results
but the people have spoken. Magistrates-elect, make every effort over
the coming year to be worthy of the trust given to you.

Foremost of all, a special congratulations to Gnaeus Salix Astur! You
will make an excellent consul my friend and colleague. Serving with
you has been a pleasure I did not expect at the end of our series of
runoffs last year.

Gaius Iulius Scaurus, I look forward to seeing you and your colleague
make the office of Curule Aedile shine as it never has before.

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus, I would have voted for you if I could but
alas the price of blue blood. ;-) I'm looking forward to sharing food
and wine with you again at Roman Days.

Caius Fabius Quintilianus my friend, it was a close election and as
you know, I did not vote for you but I wish you well as censor. I am
sure you will make an excellent colleague to Marcus Octavius.
Continue to try to reach across the partisan divide as you have this
year.

Valete,

Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com




Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18572 From: deciusiunius Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Diana Moravia Aventina"
<diana@p...> wrote:

Salve Diana Moravia,

> I have not been defeated. I have won. My Goddess has chosen to keep
>me specifically for herself and
> that makes the Consulship a poor consolation prize!

We cannot argue with one of the Immortals though Nova Roma is the
poorer for your loss in the polls--and Her gain.


>If one needs to present a facade of a sparkless
> personality in order to be Consul of this virtual nation then as I
>say 'good riddance'.

This is not entirely fair, Gnaeus Salix Astur does not have a
sparkless personality! Besides, look at the others who have been
consuls who could hardly be said to fit that description: Cassius,
Vedius, Palladius ;-), Fabius, Octavius, Sulla, etc.

I understand your frustration over the voting system, it is flawed
and it screams for reform this coming year, something I hope the
consuls will address but in the meanwhile we must live with the
legally voted upon voting system. If the recount you requested comes
up with the same results then that is that. This is not the end.
Remember Scarlett, tomorrow is another day, next year is another year.

>The ancient
> Romans -my genetic ancestors- were not stuffy which just proves to
>me how far Nova Roma has to go before we learn what being a real
>Roman really is.

Hmm, there is a lot of debate just how much or how little Roman blood
can actually be found among the Italians but that is another
discussion.

> Last but not at all least, my thanks to my dear friend Decius
>Iunius Palladius for all of the hours
> that he spent talking with me as only close friends do. I thank
>our Gods that I met him nearly 5 years ago in NR and that our
>friendhsip has grown far beyond the borders of this micronation.

You are most welcome for everything. I am glad to have met you my
friend.

Vale,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18573 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Congratulations to all magistrates-elect
Salve Illustris Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus, Amice!

>Salvete,
>
>My congratulations to all magistrates-elect! It was a hard won
>election; all candidates, winners and losers showed honor and
>fortitude. I won't lie and say I am entirely happy with the results
>but the people have spoken. Magistrates-elect, make every effort over
>the coming year to be worthy of the trust given to you.

I will do my best!

>Caius Fabius Quintilianus my friend, it was a close election and as
>you know, I did not vote for you but I wish you well as censor. I am
>sure you will make an excellent colleague to Marcus Octavius.

Thank You!

>
>Continue to try to reach across the partisan divide as you have this
>year.

Thank You for the acknowledgement! I will continue to hold out my
hand to anyone who care to see it. On the other hand I also wish to
see You continuing doing the same. I hope we will get our message
through in the long run: We are all here for the best of Nova Roma
and Roma Aeterna, next time it is someone else's turn to pull the
wagon, so why not make it easier for each other. ;-)

I will continue to listen to and discuss with You as I have done so far.

>Valete,
>
>Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Consul et Senator
Propraetor Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Consulis CFQ
http://www.insulaumbra.com/cohors_consulis_cfq/
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18574 From: Diana Moravia Aventina Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: subject?
Salve Palladius,

I'm well and I see that you are well. Certainly you look well today.Your toga is so bright I need my
sunglasses.

> Hmm, there is a lot of debate just how much or how little Roman blood
> can actually be found among the Italians but that is another
> discussion.

Marius's DNA Testing located on Aventine Hill confirmed to me that on my mother's side, I am related
to an ancient Roman olive oil producer. My father's family were of course sacred prostitutes to
Venus Erucina in Sicily.

Hence the family's affinity for easy to slip out of red clothes with olive motifs.

<You are most welcome for everything. I am glad to have met you my friend.

The pleasure was mutual LOL!

Vale,
Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18575 From: Neil Lucock Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Roleplaying/religio
On Fri, 2003-12-26 at 03:08, AthanasiosofSpfd@... wrote:
> Salve Pomponia Fabia Vera;
>
snip
> Its not acceptable, in my eyes, for someone who is not a follower of
> the Religio to play "lip service" to the Gods as if they were a believer
> on this mailing list.
In practice, what you are saying is that Nova Roma is a theocracy and
atheists are not permitted to stand for public office.
> Nova Roma is NOT a Role-playing game.
In role playing you assume a character with different circumstances and
personality from your real situation. In Nova Roma you attempt to live
your life as a Roman (you attempt to change your character to a desired
end but live in the same circumstances). It does have a lot of common
ground with role-playing (becoming something you are not, but so does
every self-directed educating process you submit to) and unless you
spend all your life speaking latin, building roads and attempting to
dominate Europe (while only using Iron Age technology), I'd suggest that
you are not really any more "Roman" than the Pope (who does live in Rome
and speaks Latin).
You are 21st Century people who choose to perpetuate certain qualities
you admire from an historical culture. Rather than role-playing (which
tends to suggest teenage boys playing D&D) it ought to be considered as
more of an "alternate lifestyle" or a sub-culture in the same way that
Jews, Muslims, Wiccans, or even Marilyn Manson fans are, when compared
to the Christan majority in the USA and England.
> I do nothing as Gaius Modius that I would not also
> do as David Kling.
I wouldn't do anything as Gaius Cornelius that I wouldn't do as Neil
Lucock and that includes falsely pretending belief in gods that I don't
believe exist.
So, if I want to stand for office, I have to lie to everyone, but if I
tell the truth, I can't stand for public office! You thought Diana's
election results were giving strange results? Here we have a system that
gives dishonest people a clear advantage over truthful ones.
Just a few thoughts, citizens,
valete
Gaius Cornelius Severus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18576 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Marinus' Words
Cn. Salix Astur Quiritibus S.P.D.

I have read the recent discussion about Marinus' salute to Venus, and
I would like to add my own thoughts on the subject, if you don't
mind.

When I go into a Catholic church, I always take off any headwear I
may be carrying. I am not a Catholic, but I do it as a sign of
respect towards those who are. I do not dip my fingers into the holy
water stoup and make the sign of the cross over my face, and neither
do I kneel in front of the crucifix. I consider that taking off my
cap or hood or speaking in a low voice is respectful, while the other
two are expressions of a devotion that I do not share. But I am able
to make this decision because I have previous experience. In the
past, I have dipped my fingers in the holy water stoup, because I was
not sure of what it meant and everyone was doing it. I stopped doing
it when I understood that that was part of a religious ceremony and
not just a sign of respect.

I think that Marinus was trying to do exactly the same. After all, we
actually require respect for the Religio Romana to our magistrates.
Perhaps he has "kneeled" instead of just "taking his hat off", but
that is understandable, because he does not know the Religio Romana
too well. I recognise this as an attempt to show his respect for the
Religio Romana, and I respect it.

In the future, I am sure that Marinus will try to restrain his
expressions towards the Religio Romana to get them back to a
respectful interest. Let's be kind with him and let's avoid the kind
of attitude that we would not like to suffer in a Catholic church if
we mistakenly dipped our fingers in the holy water stoup.

S.V.B.E.E.V.
CN.SALIX.T.F.A.NEP.OVF.ASTVR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18577 From: Flavia Lucilla Merula Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re Congratulations
>
>
>
>Sorry I studided Roman goverment and history, a subject that isn't very
>important in Nova Roma. I'm not an expert on voting systems for modern
>21st century micronations,
>
I'm fairly new to all of this, in that this is the first election in
which I've voted. I must say the results seem surprising, to say the
least, and the system does seem to be inherently' unfair'. I know a
little of the Roman Republic voting system but not enough to accurately
compare this system with it. I would be very grateful if you could
explain to me how this compares with the Roman system.

Also I just want to say it was the Religio which first drew me to Nova
Roma. I am well aware that the State Religion was a religion of
orthopraxy, not orthodoxy and, while I have great respect for other
religions and genuinely believe that people will find the path that is
right for them, I can't help wondering if I'm the only one that has
reservations about our elected magistrates being Christian. Can people
whose religion forbids them having other Gods really represent the
people in serving the Gods of Rome? I would be interested to hear
other's thoughts on this matter.

Flavia Lucilla


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18578 From: Neil Lucock Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
On Fri, 2003-12-26 at 13:24, Flavia Lucilla Merula wrote:
> >

> Also I just want to say it was the Religio which first drew me to Nova
> Roma. I am well aware that the State Religion was a religion of
> orthopraxy, not orthodoxy and, while I have great respect for other
> religions and genuinely believe that people will find the path that is
> right for them, I can't help wondering if I'm the only one that has
> reservations about our elected magistrates being Christian. Can people
> whose religion forbids them having other Gods really represent the
> people in serving the Gods of Rome? I would be interested to hear
> other's thoughts on this matter.
Salvete,
This is an excellent point, Flavia Lucilla. The phrase "can of worms"
springs to mind.I can see a lot of backpedalling and weak justifications
being posted in the next few days.

The Christians have a commandment that says that they should not worship
any other gods. How much confidence would you have in a person who is
willing to ignore an important part of their chosen religion in order to
be a politician? If they can disregard their personal god, what faith do
you have in their oaths to you? You are quite correct to point out
hypocracy. People's behaviour is rarely confined to one subject and a
hypocrite in their personal religion is likely to act hypocritically in
their other endeavours too, IMHO.
Valete,
Gaius Cornelius Severus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18579 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Salvete:

In Roma Antiqua a magistrate would perform several of the functions that a
sacerdos (or priest). In the Nova Roma of today, this is not the case. A
Praetor, Consul, or what have you would offer sacrifice to the Gods, and a
magistrate with Imperium had certain augurial responsibilities. Again, this is not
the case within Nova Roma.

Essentially the priesthood of Nova Roma handles the Religio, and those
aspects of the Religio that were the responsibility of the magistrates. This is NOT
historical, yet it does allow Christians and people of other religious
backgrounds to participate in the government of Nova Roma. In my idea world, things
would be as close as possible to the way they were in antiqua.. I do not
live in my idea world, but I can testify that there are MANY good people serving
Nova Roma who do not follow the Religio. This -- in and of itself -- is a
good thing.

I have seen the Pagan community in conflict with the Christian community in
my local area. The fact that Nova Roma is a melting pot of Christians, Pagans,
and other spiritual traditions is a testament to the metropolitan structure
that was Roma, and now is Nova Roma. Showing respect for the Gods is different
from worshiping and making sacrifices to them. A magistrate in Nova Roma
need not offer sacrifice anymore to the Gods. They simply need to be respectful.

BTW, welcome to Nova Roma Flavia Lucilla!

Valete;

Gaius Modius Athanasius

In a message dated 12/26/2003 8:42:58 AM Eastern Standard Time,
k.a.wright@... writes:
Can people
whose religion forbids them having other Gods really represent the
people in serving the Gods of Rome? I would be interested to hear
other's thoughts on this matter.

Flavia Lucilla


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18580 From: Flavia Lucilla Merula Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re Congratulations
>
>
>The fact that Nova Roma is a melting pot of Christians, Pagans,
>and other spiritual traditions is a testament to the metropolitan structure
>that was Roma, and now is Nova Roma. Showing respect for the Gods is different
>from worshiping and making sacrifices to them. A magistrate in Nova Roma
>need not offer sacrifice anymore to the Gods. They simply need to be respectful.
>
Yes, I love the fact that all spiritual persuasions can come together;
that does feel truly Roman and I, in no way, wish to come across as anti
Christian. I appreciate your explaining the difference between the
magistrates and priests of Nova Roma - I hadn't fully appreciated that.
I still have difficulty, however, in understanding how Christians can
show respect to Rome's Gods. If your religion teaches explicitly that
there is only one true God, that no other gods exist, that all other
so-called gods are false gods, then how can you honestly and truly show
respect for something you believe to be false?

Flavia Lucilla
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18581 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Salva Flavia Lucilla Merula

It is no mystery, really: It's what I have to do whenever I go to a friend or familly member's wedding or funeral. I demonstrate good mannners, do what is appropriate, show proper respect to the Priest or Minister, Sing such hymns or say such words or prayers that are not an offense to the Gods - for example, I cannot recite the Creed, but in other recitations I can add an "S" to make God into Gods and be fine with it - and of course compliment your host, hostess and clergyman for the lovely service. In my home and in my life I am fanatically Polytheistic and distinctly anti-Christian (not the people, just the Faith) and use liberal doses of Celsus on door to door missionaries; but when attending what is for all practical purposes a foreign culture I restrain my words and act with all due respect: They are as serious about their religion as I am about the Religio.
So how can Christians reciprocate? I suppose the Catholics can go to confession and be forgiven for it; the Protestants would probably need to either adopt the 'good manners' view that I do at a Christian or Jewish service, or else adopt the "mythic" mind set that they are honouring Ideals, not Gods, and therefore are doing nothing wrong.

Vale
~ Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus

-----Original Message-----
From: Flavia Lucilla Merula <k.a.wright@...>
Sent: Dec 26, 2003 10:14 AM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re Congratulations

>
>
>The fact that Nova Roma is a melting pot of Christians, Pagans,
>and other spiritual traditions is a testament to the metropolitan structure
>that was Roma, and now is Nova Roma. Showing respect for the Gods is different
>from worshiping and making sacrifices to them. A magistrate in Nova Roma
>need not offer sacrifice anymore to the Gods. They simply need to be respectful.
>
Yes, I love the fact that all spiritual persuasions can come together;
that does feel truly Roman and I, in no way, wish to come across as anti
Christian. I appreciate your explaining the difference between the
magistrates and priests of Nova Roma - I hadn't fully appreciated that.
I still have difficulty, however, in understanding how Christians can
show respect to Rome's Gods. If your religion teaches explicitly that
there is only one true God, that no other gods exist, that all other
so-called gods are false gods, then how can you honestly and truly show
respect for something you believe to be false?

Flavia Lucilla


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18582 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Salve Flavia Lucilla Merula,

You asked:
> If your religion teaches explicitly that
> there is only one true God, that no other gods exist, that all other
> so-called gods are false gods, then how can you honestly and truly show
> respect for something you believe to be false?

What a religion teaches, and what one person chooses to accept, are
often different things. The Vatican teaches that contraception is
wrong, but in survey responses something over 90% of married American
Catholic women report using contraception of some sort.

My personal spirituality has much of Christianity in it, and much of
other things as well. If I discuss any matter involving the gods
and goddesses of Rome here, you can bet that what I say is based on
more than casual knowledge.

As for how the professed Christians who are Nova Roman magistrates can
honestly and truly show respect for the gods and goddesses of Roma,
all I can say is that many do. There are many thoughtful people in
Nova Roma, and I think it's better to recognize the inclusive and
accepting character of Roman culture at work among us than to assume
people must somehow be dishonest if they don't adhere to some kind
of orthodoxy.

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18583 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Salve Flavia,

1) First and foremost I trust those in office who have contributed
greatly to Nova Roma by their "actions and works" they have achieved.
For example I have never asked Gnaeus Salix Astur about his religious
beliefs but I see the fruits of his work, dedication and
approachability and I know he is trustworthy beyond question. I'm
sure there have been some others in NR who have been serious with
respect to the religio but contribute far less than others who may be
Christian, Jewish or perhaps Islamic. Just praying and sacrificing to
the gods of Rome or crying praise the lord allelujia for example will
not get the hard physical work of office achieved by itself.


2) If we follow Ancient Rome 100 %, we'd have to skid many of our
candidates from office, religio or no religio. The last time I posted
ages for different political offices, it seems that Quaestors had to
be at leat 27 and consels about 40 +. Women were forbidden to enter
political office so they would have to stay home, mind their children
and slaves and press their political thoughts and plots from the
husband's bedroom. Under these circumstances there would be very few
of us left would there not?

3) Christians should have no problem in being respectful of other
religions. Our first commandment says that " I shall have no "other
gods before me" and this indicates to me that the god of Abraham says
that there are other dieties out there. They do not worship the other
gods personally but can respect the belief of others and behave
properly at their public ceremonies and say a quiet personal prayer
to themselves whilst the others are doing their thing. Also the
rights of other's freedoms and beliefs must be protected and
respected and those people treated as brothers or sisters. Also
Christians in Nova Roma could certainly continually educate
themselves on the Roman religion; furthermore I consider it a great
honour when person from the religio Romano says a prayer to their
gods on my behalf when life's problems come my way.


Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus



In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Flavia Lucilla Merula <k.a.wright@n...>
wrote:
> >
> >
> >The fact that Nova Roma is a melting pot of Christians, Pagans,
> >and other spiritual traditions is a testament to the metropolitan
structure
> >that was Roma, and now is Nova Roma. Showing respect for the Gods
is different
> >from worshiping and making sacrifices to them. A magistrate in
Nova Roma
> >need not offer sacrifice anymore to the Gods. They simply need to
be respectful.
> >
> Yes, I love the fact that all spiritual persuasions can come
together;
> that does feel truly Roman and I, in no way, wish to come across as
anti
> Christian. I appreciate your explaining the difference between the
> magistrates and priests of Nova Roma - I hadn't fully appreciated
that.
> I still have difficulty, however, in understanding how Christians
can
> show respect to Rome's Gods. If your religion teaches explicitly
that
> there is only one true God, that no other gods exist, that all
other
> so-called gods are false gods, then how can you honestly and truly
show
> respect for something you believe to be false?
>
> Flavia Lucilla
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18584 From: Flavia Lucilla Merula Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re Congratulations
>
>
>In my home and in my life I am fanatically Polytheistic and distinctly anti-Christian (not the people, just the Faith) and use liberal doses of Celsus on door to door missionaries; but when attending what is for all practical purposes a foreign culture I restrain my words and act with all due respect: They are as serious about their religion as I am about the Religio.
>
Yes, I too am a polytheist. I'm not anti-Christain. I can accept the
reality of many other Gods, than those I have dealings with. However,
Christianity teaches there is only one God. Now, to me, respecting
another's religion (as indeed many of my Christian friends do with me)
is totally different from respecting the Gods themselves. That's where
I have the difficulty in understanding. How do you respect something you
don't believe exists?

Flavia Lucilla
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18585 From: Flavia Lucilla Merula Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re Congratulations
>
>What a religion teaches, and what one person chooses to accept, are
>often different things. The Vatican teaches that contraception is
>wrong, but in survey responses something over 90% of married American
>Catholic women report using contraception of some sort.


Well yes, point taken, but I think the difference here is as you said 'the Vatican teaches'. Now most Catholics I know (indeed I used to be one) would argue that whether you accept what the Vatican says is a matter of individual conscience. Indeed I've had a priest argue that on the very subject of contraception. Indeed many have argued that had Vatican II not been completely undermined by the current Pope, being one of the most reactionary for years, that the Church's attitude to contraception would indeed have officially changed by now.

I think there's a vast difference between that sort of teaching and the whole underlying basis of Christianity which is that there is only one God and the only way to salvation is through his son Jesus Christ and that his foolowers shall have no other Gods.


>If I discuss any matter involving the gods
>and goddesses of Rome here, you can bet that what I say is based on
>more than casual knowledge.

I'm in no way arguing with your knowledge, I simply feel, and this is not meant as a personal attack, that there is a vast difference between knowledge and true respect.

>
>As for how the professed Christians who are Nova Roman magistrates can
>honestly and truly show respect for the gods and goddesses of Roma,
>all I can say is that many do.

I'm glad to hear it, I'm just trying to come to a better understanding as to how they can do so and reconcile it with their own beliefs.

> There are many thoughtful people in
>Nova Roma, and I think it's better to recognize the inclusive and
>accepting character of Roman culture at work among us than to assume
>people must somehow be dishonest if they don't adhere to some kind
>of orthodoxy.

I love the inclusive character of Rome and Nova Roma. I have never suggested that anyone is dishonest and am quite prepared to admit that the lack of understanding I have may, indeed, be a failure on my part, but I still don't "get it" as they say.

Flavia Lucilla



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18586 From: spqr_legionary Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Question
Salve,
I must ask why is it so many of the "Leaders" seem to avoid any help
with Questions from new Citizens?
I had thought also the corner stone of Nova Roma was Pagenism, But
yet seeing the Various Postings that it is not.
Also, If this is not an attempy to bring back the best in Roman Life
what is it?
Are We a Nation in a sort of Exile or are We just citizens with a
Play or pretend life?
Lucius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18587 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Salve Flavia Lucilla Merula,

Continuing our conversation...

I'd written:
> > The Vatican teaches that contraception is
> >wrong, but in survey responses something over 90% of married American
> >Catholic women report using contraception of some sort.
>
> Well yes, point taken, but I think the difference here is as you said
> 'the Vatican teaches'. Now most Catholics I know (indeed I used to be
> one) would argue that whether you accept what the Vatican says is a
> matter of individual conscience.

In the language of the Catholic Church, there are teachings of doctrine
and of dogma. Doctrinal teachings include things like the belief in
the Trinity, the bodily assumption of Mary into heaven, and such.
Dogmatic teachings are about things like contraception, the celibacy
of priests, whether it's OK to eat meat on Fridays, and similar matters
which are not central questions of faith.

> I think there's a vast difference between that sort of teaching and the
> whole underlying basis of Christianity which is that there is only one
> God and the only way to salvation is through his son Jesus Christ and
> that his followers shall have no other Gods.

It's a difference between dogma and doctrine, yes. But there have been
doctrinal differences among Christian sects for a very long time.
If you look at Arianism, which flourished in Alexandria during the
4th(?) century CE, it was the original Unitarian 'heresy' of Christianity,
and it also provided the philosophical basis for Islam. There are and
have been many Christian sects that professed the divinity of Christ
while also according respect to other entities worshiped as gods by
their ancestors. Bridgit has been revered in Ireland for much longer
than since Patrick was Bishop of Armagh.

There are many Christian communities which do not condemn their members
for also according respect, praise, even worship to other Powers. They
just don't get in the news much because hatred makes better headlines.

> >If I discuss any matter involving the gods
> >and goddesses of Rome here, you can bet that what I say is based on
> >more than casual knowledge.
>
> I'm in no way arguing with your knowledge, I simply feel, and this is
> not meant as a personal attack, that there is a vast difference between
> knowledge and true respect.

I ask, in all kindness and sincerity, why your opinion has any bearing
on my spirituality? If I pour out a libation to Thor, just using him
as an example for the moment, isn't the worth of the offering between
him and me? If he finds my offering sincere, then that's enough. If
he doesn't, then no amount of posturing on my part will make him change
his mind.

If I say, "Ave, Venus" as I did yesterday, then that praise and honor
is hers. She has been a Power in this world for a very long time, and
she can determine the value of my respect for her. I'm disappointed that
her priestess didn't accept the praise as it was intended, but I won't
let that reduce my opinion of Gaius Iulius Caesar's 41st-Great Grandmother.

> >As for how the professed Christians who are Nova Roman magistrates can
> >honestly and truly show respect for the gods and goddesses of Roma,
> >all I can say is that many do.
>
> I'm glad to hear it, I'm just trying to come to a better understanding
> as to how they can do so and reconcile it with their own beliefs.

One of the best things to ever happen in the history of the Western
world was the Protestant Reformation. Martin Luther's central message
to all people, everywhere, was, "Think for yourself! Study. Learn.
Seek out knowledge and question all authority. Believe not because you
have been told to believe, but because you have been convinced by the
evidence of your own sense."

Each person who comes to Nova Roma has the opportunity to learn about
the spiritual pathways taken by Romans of antiquity, whether the State
Cult, or Mithrism, or the Cult of the Eagles, or the Cult of Magna Mater,
or one of the Eastern Mysteries. Each person can find in these things
that are good, and which resonate with their own personal spiritual
selves. By that, in the tradition of Roman religious tolerance and
inclusivism, we all benefit.

Vale,

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18588 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Question
spqr_legionary wrote:
>
> Salve,
> I must ask why is it so many of the "Leaders" seem to avoid any help
> with Questions from new Citizens?

Could you give me an example of this? Questions generally do get
answered, often by whomever happens to be reading their mail first.
The elected magistrates and other leaders are not in constant e-mail
contact, but they do look in and check their mail most days. We
currently have a number of magistrates who are busy with holiday
visits and suchlike.

But if you have a question, then please, by all means, ask. I'll
answer if I know the answer.

> I had thought also the corner stone of Nova Roma was Pagenism,

Have you read our Declaration? The recreation of the Religio Romana
is indeed one of the reasons for the establishment of Nova Roma, but
it is not the only reason. Just as with Roma Antiqua, we have many
reasons for being. Our common interest is to restore respect for Rome's
greatness in the modern world.

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18589 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Question
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "spqr_legionary" <rotedragon@m...>
wrote:
> Salve,
> I must ask why is it so many of the "Leaders" seem to avoid any
help with Questions from new Citizens?

I don't know. Perhaps you should ask them directly eg: My citizenship
has not come through [ attention - Marcus Octavius Germanicus) Is
Roman Religion ceremony being properly conducted? - ( Attention
Pontifex Cassius) etc. I never had a problem getting answered in my
20 months in NR.

> I had thought also the corner stone of Nova Roma was Pagenism, But
> yet seeing the Various Postings that it is not.


It is stressed here fairly well here and there are mechanisms in the
constitution to protect the religion. In reality, the Roman republic
and later empire tolerated many different religions. I always thought
Rome's multicultural approach was part of her success. Also there
have been many discussions on the religion, the last big one was on
augerism (signs from the gods) which was discussed last week. The
election campaign has taken up a lot of the postings over the last
month. Ask any question on the relgion and you'll find many learned
people anwering you quickly.

> Also, If this is not an attempy to bring back the best in Roman
Life
> what is it?

In my opinion it is her virtues that you can find on the main page of
NR. Also many of us have a yearning for ancient Rome somewhat like a
salmon who leaves the ocean for its inland spawning ground because
Rome was the founation of our western civilization.


> Are We a Nation in a sort of Exile or are We just citizens with a
> Play or pretend life?
> Lucius


We take Res Republica and her restoration very seriously. It is our
interest and passion that keeps many dedicated people here. I as well
as many others would have a lot more better things to do with our
time if we did not really believe in this.

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18590 From: Livia Cornelia Hibernia Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Salvete Cornelius Severus et Omnes

> [...snipped...]
>How much confidence would you have in a person who is willing to
>ignore an important part of their chosen religion in order to
>be a politician?
[...snipped...]

Do you mean like the many Catholic politicians who ignore the
teachings of the Church and edicts of the Pope to support divorce and
a woman's legal right to an abortion? Personally, I respect them more
than I do someone who has given over their though process to
religious leader or who is using such religious issues to garner more
votes in the next election.

Others here have stated, quite rightly, that the Religio Romana
demanded othopraxy from the magistrates of Rome, not orthodoxy.
Indeed this can be said of the relationship of the Religio to all
Citizens, not just magistrates. One's personal cult was just that:
personal. As long as one did what was required of them in the public
cult, and beyond the requirments placed on magistrates and priests,
that was actually very little, they were free to practice any belief
system or none at all.

If a magistrate in Ancient Rome were a member of the cult of Isis or
of Mithras, neither of whom were Roman deities, that was fine, so
long as in the public rites required of them ex officio, they
performed the rites correctly (For reference see: Scheid, John; "An
Introduction to Roman Religion", Indiana University Press,
Bloomington, 2003, ISBN 0-253-21660-5).

Classical Greco-Roman Polytheism was not the kind of dogmatic,
orthodoxic religions that we see in the modern world. So long as the
public rituals were correctly performed, the gods and the people were
happy. The magistrate back then, who was a devotee of Mithras, would
never have been accused of "Role-Playing" nor of hypocracy when
making a sacrifice to Jupiter.

For that matter, how many Pagans here gave up the Christian holiday
and volunteered to work yesterday? How many went to family
gatherings and sang Christmas carols? How many will take Good Friday
and Easter week off, especially in Europe were in many countries Good
Friday or even all of Holy Week is a legal holiday? Is that hypocracy?

Please check out the new ReligioBookGroup at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioBookGroup
Our discussions of the above referenced work have been on hold over
the holidays, but should pickup again after the weekend.

I think the subject of the Religio Romana is one that has been
neglected here on the Main Nova Roma list. Perhaps that is because
politics tends to dominate here and there is a separate Religio list.
However, since the Religio was the original reason for the founding
of Nova Roma, and since it is the established religion of Nova Roma,
we should have at least some discussion of it here.

Valete
Livia Cornelia Hibernia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18591 From: rory12001 Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: the ReligioBookGroup
Salvete Quirites;
everyone who is involved in this discussion should right now join;
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioBookGroup/

where we right now have discussed these issues under the leadership
of the Pontifex Maximus; & get John Scheid's "Roman Religion" which
the PM & pontifeces regards as our handbook;

p28 from Scheid;
" Liberty, the sole article of faith.....
The principle by which it {the Roman Religion) was ruled, in the
historical period at least, was a civic rationality that guaranteed
the liberty and dignity of its members both human and divine. That
article of 'faith', virtually the only one known to Roman religion,
was constantly affirmed and defended by authorities and thinkers
alike....
In the name of the same principle, people could all honour the gods
and practise whatever cults they chose, providing they respected the
public cult and its pre-eminence, public order, and the liberty of
others."

Quirites we must live the above if Nova Roma is to be a civil
society,
optime valete Pomponia Fabia Vera
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18592 From: FrBryanReif@aol.com Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Religion in Nova Roma
Salve,

One of the reasons that I joined Nova-Roma, was its clause within its Constitution that all citizens of Nova Roma have freedom of religion. If Nova Roma had required its citizens to be pagan, or something else, joining would have been difficult for me. I was pleased to find, and to join an openly Christian gens within the Republic, and to become a citizen of Nova Roma, as I have an affinity towards ancient Rome, its art, architecture, military history, commerce, and culture. All of these and more, not just the Religio are a part of Nova Roma's charter and greatness.

One of the halmarks of the Roman Empire and Roman culture was its tolerance of the many different religions that existed within its sphere of influence. This included Judaism, and Christianity. Yes, these were persecuted, but the persecutions of these faiths were not as widespread as we may have been led to beleive. Most persecutions were of a limited scope. In reality, these prospered in the Empire, and even within Rome itself. Also, I might also point out that in 313, Constantine did recognize Christianity as a credible religion in the Empire. So Christianity was a part of the ancient Roman culture, and does, and should have a place in the culture of Nova Roma as well (as do, and should all others).

Freedom of Religion, as stated within Nova Roma's constitution, is an important element of the Roman Virtue of tolerance. Tolerance is the key to peace in Nova Roma.

Q. Bianchius Rufinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18593 From: Lucius Martianus Paullus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Question
Salve,
I did write to a number of Leaders. I made a mistake with one, He
tore me lightly apart. He suggested I was not part of My Gens as he
said he know my Pater.
A number didn't bother to respond back, yet the posted on a few sites
using the e-address that i sent it to.
I am not yet part of any political fations so that could not be a
reason.
I read and printed out a number of things off the Nova Roma site.
Also have a number of people that have a intrest in joining. I
believe that if there is a return to Roman Nationhood, I would move
there and serve it in what ever way the senate wants me too ( yes
even as a trash picker)
I am a pagen, I have been for a number of years. I firmly believe in
fact and practice.
I am a former Military man, so I tend to see things in black and
white. There is very little gray in the world of truth.
In Regards,
Lucius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18594 From: deciusiunius Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Bill Gawne <gawne@c...> wrote:
> Salve Flavia Lucilla Merula,

Salve Gnaeus Equitius,

> Continuing our conversation...

If I may interject...

> I'd written:
> > > The Vatican teaches that contraception is
> > >wrong, but in survey responses something over 90% of married
American
> > >Catholic women report using contraception of some sort.
> >
> > Well yes, point taken, but I think the difference here is as you
said
> > 'the Vatican teaches'. Now most Catholics I know (indeed I used
to be
> > one) would argue that whether you accept what the Vatican says is
a
> > matter of individual conscience.
>
> In the language of the Catholic Church, there are teachings of
>doctrine and of dogma.

Your terminology is confused. In the language of the Catholic Church,
doctrine and dogma are exactly the same. Perhaps a better distiction
you are looking for would be between doctrine/dogma and discipline.
Doctrine/dogma deals with faith and morals and cannot be changed by
the church since they believe they were handed down from their God.
Dogmatic teachings as you mention below include the Trinity, the
Assumption, murder, extramartital sex and many others. There are
different levels of doctrinal teaching and does not have to be ex
cathedra and in fact most is not. Contrary to what you say below,
contraception IS a doctrinal teaching and is a mortal sin. If one is
a Catholic and practices contraception, as I did when I was a
Catholic, then one is in contradiction with doctrine and the Church
and not a Catholic in good conscience. Paul VI, who put many of
Vatican II's "reforms" into effect spoke against contraception as
forcefully as JP II. As an ex-catholic I doubt any Pope will ever
contradict those teachings and remain Catholic.

Discipline on the other hand is what you mistakenly refer to as
dogma. That would include meat on Fridays, use of Latin in the Mass,
priestly celibacy, Mass on Saturday instead of Sunday. Female
ordination is a gray area but more recent pronouncements put this
under doctrine rather than discipline.

> Doctrinal teachings include things like the belief in
> the Trinity, the bodily assumption of Mary into heaven, and such.
> Dogmatic teachings are about things like contraception, the celibacy
> of priests, whether it's OK to eat meat on Fridays, and similar
>matters which are not central questions of faith.

Exactly right (except for confusion of terminology).

>
> > >If I discuss any matter involving the gods
> > >and goddesses of Rome here, you can bet that what I say is based
>>on
> > >more than casual knowledge.
> >
> > I'm in no way arguing with your knowledge, I simply feel, and
>>this is not meant as a personal attack, that there is a vast
>>difference between knowledge and true respect.

> I ask, in all kindness and sincerity, why your opinion has any
>bearing on my spirituality? If I pour out a libation to Thor, just
>using him as an example for the moment, isn't the worth of the
>offering between him and me? If he finds my offering sincere, then
>that's enough. If he doesn't, then no amount of posturing on my
>part will make him change his mind.

Well, because you are an officer in an organization whose main goal
and raison d'etre is to revive and promote the Religio Romana.
Magistracies are semi-religious in nature, there is no escaping the
fact, though not as fully as in Roma Antiqua, as Modius pointed out.
You have never posted anything about the religio before or made
reference towards any deity that I recall, so your recents spate of
posts with religious references have the *appearance* of posturing. I
say appearance becaue no one can look inside you so we judge you by
your words and deeds. Your posts did not help; you are not RR so it
appeared you were being insincere--political posturing.


There has been this religio--non-religio tension since day one of
Nova Roma and even before. We weren't sure initially whether to even
admit Christians. They were admitted somewhat reluctantly and have
served well over the years but to be honest I think a lot of RR are
still a little nervous over Christian magistrates. Long memories. I
suggested and wrote the oath of office in those early days to prevent
fundamentalist xtians and traditionalist catholics from holding
office, under the hopeful assumption they would be unable to take
such oaths to "false" Gods and if they did so anyway and tried to
move against the religio they could be removed from office.
Fortunately we have never run across this situation. I doubt this
tension or nervousness on the part of many of the RR will ever go
away.

> Each person who comes to Nova Roma has the opportunity to learn
>about the spiritual pathways taken by Romans of antiquity, whether
>the State Cult, or Mithrism, or the Cult of the Eagles, or the Cult
>of Magna Mater, or one of the Eastern Mysteries. Each person can
>find in these things that are good, and which resonate with their
>own personal spiritual selves. By that, in the tradition of Roman
>religious tolerance and inclusivism, we all benefit.

On that we agree. I hope you understand the reactions of some of your
fellow citizens of the Religio and why you received the reactions you
did.

Vale,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18595 From: deciusiunius Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Bill Gawne <gawne@c...> wrote:
> Salve Flavia Lucilla Merula,

Salve Gnaeus Equitius,

> Continuing our conversation...

If I may interject...

> I'd written:
> > > The Vatican teaches that contraception is
> > >wrong, but in survey responses something over 90% of married
American
> > >Catholic women report using contraception of some sort.
> >
> > Well yes, point taken, but I think the difference here is as you
said
> > 'the Vatican teaches'. Now most Catholics I know (indeed I used
to be
> > one) would argue that whether you accept what the Vatican says is
a
> > matter of individual conscience.
>
> In the language of the Catholic Church, there are teachings of
>doctrine and of dogma.

Your terminology is confused. In the language of the Catholic Church,
doctrine and dogma are exactly the same. Perhaps a better distiction
you are looking for would be between doctrine/dogma and discipline.
Doctrine/dogma deals with faith and morals and cannot be changed by
the church since they believe they were handed down from their God.
Dogmatic teachings as you mention below include the Trinity, the
Assumption, murder, extramartital sex and many others. There are
different levels of doctrinal teaching and does not have to be ex
cathedra and in fact most is not. Contrary to what you say below,
contraception IS a doctrinal teaching and is a mortal sin. If one is
a Catholic and practices contraception, as I did when I was a
Catholic, then one is in contradiction with doctrine and the Church
and not a Catholic in good conscience. Paul VI, who put many of
Vatican II's "reforms" into effect spoke against contraception as
forcefully as JP II. As an ex-catholic I doubt any Pope will ever
contradict those teachings and remain Catholic.

Discipline on the other hand is what you mistakenly refer to as
dogma. That would include meat on Fridays, use of Latin in the Mass,
priestly celibacy, Mass on Saturday instead of Sunday. Female
ordination is a gray area but more recent pronouncements put this
under doctrine rather than discipline.

> Doctrinal teachings include things like the belief in
> the Trinity, the bodily assumption of Mary into heaven, and such.
> Dogmatic teachings are about things like contraception, the celibacy
> of priests, whether it's OK to eat meat on Fridays, and similar
>matters which are not central questions of faith.

Exactly right (except for confusion of terminology).

>
> > >If I discuss any matter involving the gods
> > >and goddesses of Rome here, you can bet that what I say is based
>>on
> > >more than casual knowledge.
> >
> > I'm in no way arguing with your knowledge, I simply feel, and
>>this is not meant as a personal attack, that there is a vast
>>difference between knowledge and true respect.

> I ask, in all kindness and sincerity, why your opinion has any
>bearing on my spirituality? If I pour out a libation to Thor, just
>using him as an example for the moment, isn't the worth of the
>offering between him and me? If he finds my offering sincere, then
>that's enough. If he doesn't, then no amount of posturing on my
>part will make him change his mind.

Well, because you are an officer in an organization whose main goal
and raison d'etre is to revive and promote the Religio Romana.
Magistracies are semi-religious in nature, there is no escaping the
fact, though not as fully as in Roma Antiqua, as Modius pointed out.
You have never posted anything about the religio before or made
reference towards any deity that I recall, so your recents spate of
posts with religious references have the *appearance* of posturing. I
say appearance becaue no one can look inside you so we judge you by
your words and deeds. Your posts did not help; you are not RR so it
appeared you were being insincere--political posturing.


There has been this religio--non-religio tension since day one of
Nova Roma and even before. We weren't sure initially whether to even
admit Christians. They were admitted somewhat reluctantly and have
served well over the years but to be honest I think a lot of RR are
still a little nervous over Christian magistrates. Long memories. I
suggested and wrote the oath of office in those early days to prevent
fundamentalist xtians and traditionalist catholics from holding
office, under the hopeful assumption they would be unable to take
such oaths to "false" Gods and if they did so anyway and tried to
move against the religio they could be removed from office.
Fortunately we have never run across this situation. I doubt this
tension or nervousness on the part of many of the RR will ever go
away.

> Each person who comes to Nova Roma has the opportunity to learn
>about the spiritual pathways taken by Romans of antiquity, whether
>the State Cult, or Mithrism, or the Cult of the Eagles, or the Cult
>of Magna Mater, or one of the Eastern Mysteries. Each person can
>find in these things that are good, and which resonate with their
>own personal spiritual selves. By that, in the tradition of Roman
>religious tolerance and inclusivism, we all benefit.

On that we agree. I hope you understand the reactions of some of your
fellow citizens of the Religio and why you received the reactions you
did.

Vale,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18596 From: deciusiunius Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Question
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Bill Gawne <gawne@c...> wrote:

> Have you read our Declaration? The recreation of the Religio Romana
> is indeed one of the reasons for the establishment of Nova Roma, but
> it is not the only reason. Just as with Roma Antiqua, we have many
> reasons for being. Our common interest is to restore respect for
>Rome's greatness in the modern world.

It's not our only reason but it is the *central* reason. Nova Roma
was founded by Roman pagans to revive the Religio, plain and simple.
Everything else is just window dressing or icing on the cake,
whichever cliche you prefer.

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18597 From: deciusiunius Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
This is what happens when one doesn't proofread before clicking send.
The sentence below from my previous long post was unclear. Here t is
rewritten:

Dogmatic teachings as you mention below include the Trinity, the
Assumption, murder, extramartital sex and many others. There are
different levels of doctrinal teaching; they do not have to be ex
cathedra and in fact most are not.


Vale,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18598 From: FrBryanReif@aol.com Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Military Re-enactments
Salve,

Does anyone know of a roman military unit or group re-enacting in the mid-west United States, in Ohio particularly.

Q. Bianchius Rufinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18599 From: FrBryanReif@aol.com Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: my post on fredom of religion in Nova Roma
Salve,

My previous post was meant in no way to be disrespectful of any person's private religious practices, or of any religious institution. It was just an observation based on reading several posts...it was not meant to "convert" or pontificate.

Q. Bianchius Rufinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18600 From: Fr. Apulus Caesar Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Official Results in the Comitia Plebis Tributa
Salvete Omnes,
first of all I want to thank all the citizens voted me as Tribune. I'ts an
honor for me to be elected Senior Tribune and I hope to serve the plebeians
and the Res Publica as well as possible.
Secondly let me say "thank you" to the people sent me own congratulations
and endorsements.

And finally I want to congratulate with all the new elected magistrates.
First of all my next colleagues, honorable and skilled citizens which will
compose a wonderful staff of Tribunes. I want to claim the triumph of my
friends: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus, again winner and I'm sure wonderful
Censor with Germanicus; Gnaeus Salix Astur, I think he'll be one of the best
Consul of NR, and Gnaeus Equitius Marinus, skilled colleague and dear
friend; Marcus Iulius Perusianus, my italian "brother" and one of the best
nova roman I think. And again the wonderful Noricus, the nice Finnica, the
optimum Audens. Please, excuse me if I forget someone, the wish of a good
Magistracy is for all of you.

Valete
Franciscus Apulus Caesar
------------------------------
NOVA ROMA
------------------------------
Senior Curule Aedile - http://aediles.novaroma.org/apulus/
Propraetor Italiae - http://italia.novaroma.org
Scriba et Accensus
Pater Familiae Gens Apula - http://italia.novaroma.org/apula/
Vicarius Academiae Italicae - http://italia.novaroma.org/academiaitalica/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18601 From: Fr. Apulus Caesar Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: error in the results?
Salvete Omnes,
sorry, but I remember that in the beginning of December Caius Iulius Marius
sent a message withdrawling his candidacy as Quaestor. Why in the official
results he's winner?

Marius is a my dear friend and we would likw to know is there is an error.

Please contact me privately if you prefer.

Valete
Franciscus Apulus Caesar
------------------------------
NOVA ROMA
------------------------------
Senior Curule Aedile - http://aediles.novaroma.org/apulus/
Propraetor Italiae - http://italia.novaroma.org
Scriba et Accensus
Pater Familiae Gens Apula - http://italia.novaroma.org/apula/
Vicarius Academiae Italicae - http://italia.novaroma.org/academiaitalica/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18602 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: ATTENTION MAGISTRATES Re: [ReligioRomana] New poll for ReligioRomana
Salve

I am writing to request that the appropriate Magistrates investigate and determine WHO has been creating these pseudo-"Polls" and then advertising them anonymously on the Religio List.

After the first "Poll" was posted, the Citizen Members of the Religio List UNANIMOUSLY denounced the "Poll", after which a second pseudo-"Poll" was created and again advertized anonymously.

I would appreciate action on this matter, as such political and divisive "polls" have no place on the Religio List.
Furthermore, any advice regarding possible legal recourse would be appreciated.

Vale
~ Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus

-----Original Message-----
From: ReligioRomana@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Dec 26, 2003 1:42 PM
To: ReligioRomana@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [ReligioRomana] New poll for ReligioRomana


Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
ReligioRomana group:

If Nova Roma could be reorganized, it
should be constructed as

o a pagan only organization
o a Roman pagans only organization
o for everyone including roleplayers


To vote, please visit the following web page:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/surveys?id=1165452

Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.

Thanks!







Community email addresses:
Post message: ReligioRomana@onelist.com
Subscribe: ReligioRomana-subscribe@onelist.com
Unsubscribe: ReligioRomana-unsubscribe@onelist.com
List owner: ReligioRomana-owner@onelist.com

Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/ReligioRomana


Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ReligioRomana-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18603 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: error in the results?
Salve Amice!

I wil forward this to my colleague and to the next year's Consuls.

>Salvete Omnes,
>sorry, but I remember that in the beginning of December Caius Iulius Marius
>sent a message withdrawling his candidacy as Quaestor. Why in the official
>results he's winner?
>
>Marius is a my dear friend and we would likw to know is there is an error.
>
>Please contact me privately if you prefer.
>
>Valete
>Franciscus Apulus Caesar
>------------------------------
>NOVA ROMA
>------------------------------
>Senior Curule Aedile - http://aediles.novaroma.org/apulus/
>Propraetor Italiae - http://italia.novaroma.org
>Scriba et Accensus
>Pater Familiae Gens Apula - http://italia.novaroma.org/apula/
>Vicarius Academiae Italicae - http://italia.novaroma.org/academiaitalica/

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Consul et Senator
Propraetor Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Consulis CFQ
http://www.insulaumbra.com/cohors_consulis_cfq/
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18604 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Religion in Nova Roma
---
Salve Fr Bryan:

Very well stated sir. With some of my thoughts if I may:

Within the terms "Christianity" or "Christian" there lies quite a
diversity of beliefs, as doubtless the myriad of Pagan faiths do.
There are Christians who believe in intercessory prayer to saints and
some do not. Some believe in the trinity and some do not, some
believe in this and that. Yadda yadda.

That is why I chuckle when I see clergy of the Religio Romano and
other belief systems 'tell' me, and others what I can and cannot,
must and must not believe, because I believe in the divinity of
Christ. (sorry guys, but its true)

This seems to be pulled as a trump card every election year, sadly.
Some folks can't resist the temptation to make a religious royal
rumble instead of celebrating what we have in common. "You" have read
the website correctly, as it reads now. Others unfortunately, have not.

To me, there is often a fine line between saint and god/goddess.
Going back far enough in legend and folklore, Hermes is associated
with St. Michael the Archangel. St. Brigett was a goddess, and to
some, I imagine, as is Hermes (Mercury). I simply do not know enough
about 'whose who' in the cosmos to say who did and didn't, doesn't and
doesn't exist, and fighting about it is counterproductive to all.

I believe in the existance of Apollo from a couple of personal
experiences, but I do not hold him above almighty god, and he himself
answered to Zeus/Jupiter, so I don't imagine he's too upset about it.
I'm hardpressed to think Jesus is either (sigh).
I do not do the rituals of the RR, but being a total 'unbeliever' or
complete spiritual lepper is not an accurate appraisal either.

The prophetess in the Book of acts was likely suffering from the curse
of Cassandra in my view (the one Paul told to more or less, shut up),
to wit, she would speak the truth and nobody would believe her.

I do not hold any deity, angel or saint above almighty God, as defined
by my faith, but that is a far cry from being what a couple of posters
have dubbed an "unbeliever" in the Gods of Rome, a far cry from being
unappreciative of the influence of spirituality on the Roman
civilization, and a far cry from being incapable of upholding respect
for other's religious practises and a far cry from being able to
practise fairness and judgement based on the Roman virtues.

Christians here, as I've stated and restated ad nauseum, are not
hyperfundies who are trying to destroy the religious freedoms of those
who practise the RR or other pagan faith. They may not agree with it,
either all or in total, but they are not out to destroy anything. They
are here, largely because they love Rome. Period.

To some, and I say this with concern and nothing else, it is like
talking to the wall. Such arguments and misunderstandings could well
be our undoing, sadly.



Bene vale, and sorry to talk your ear off :)

Po







In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, FrBryanReif@a... wrote:
> Salve,
>
> One of the reasons that I joined Nova-Roma, was its clause within
its Constitution that all citizens of Nova Roma have freedom of
religion. If Nova Roma had required its citizens to be pagan, or
something else, joining would have been difficult for me. I was
pleased to find, and to join an openly Christian gens within the
Republic, and to become a citizen of Nova Roma, as I have an affinity
towards ancient Rome, its art, architecture, military history,
commerce, and culture. All of these and more, not just the Religio
are a part of Nova Roma's charter and greatness.
>
> One of the halmarks of the Roman Empire and Roman culture was its
tolerance of the many different religions that existed within its
sphere of influence. This included Judaism, and Christianity. Yes,
these were persecuted, but the persecutions of these faiths were not
as widespread as we may have been led to beleive. Most persecutions
were of a limited scope. In reality, these prospered in the Empire,
and even within Rome itself. Also, I might also point out that in 313,
Constantine did recognize Christianity as a credible religion in the
Empire. So Christianity was a part of the ancient Roman culture, and
does, and should have a place in the culture of Nova Roma as well (as
do, and should all others).
>
> Freedom of Religion, as stated within Nova Roma's constitution, is
an important element of the Roman Virtue of tolerance. Tolerance is
the key to peace in Nova Roma.
>
> Q. Bianchius Rufinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18605 From: Franciscus Apulus Caesar Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: error in the results?
Salve Amice,
thank you very much, as even you're so wonderful.

I want to congratulate with you for your election, you are winner
again and this show that NR appreciate your job. I'm sure you'll be
a wonderful Censor.

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
<christer.edling@t...> wrote:
> Salve Amice!
>
> I wil forward this to my colleague and to the next year's Consuls.
>
> >Salvete Omnes,
> >sorry, but I remember that in the beginning of December Caius
Iulius Marius
> >sent a message withdrawling his candidacy as Quaestor. Why in the
official
> >results he's winner?
> >
> >Marius is a my dear friend and we would likw to know is there is
an error.
> >
> >Please contact me privately if you prefer.
> >
> >Valete
> >Franciscus Apulus Caesar
> >------------------------------
> >NOVA ROMA
> >------------------------------
> >Senior Curule Aedile - http://aediles.novaroma.org/apulus/
> >Propraetor Italiae - http://italia.novaroma.org
> >Scriba et Accensus
> >Pater Familiae Gens Apula - http://italia.novaroma.org/apula/
> >Vicarius Academiae Italicae -
http://italia.novaroma.org/academiaitalica/
>
> --
>
> Vale
>
> Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
> Senior Consul et Senator
> Propraetor Thules
> Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
> Civis Romanus sum
> ************************************************
> Cohors Consulis CFQ
> http://www.insulaumbra.com/cohors_consulis_cfq/
> ************************************************
> Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
> "I'll either find a way or make one"
> ************************************************
> Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
> Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18606 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: error in the results?
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Fr. Apulus Caesar"
<sacro_barese_impero@l...> wrote:
> Salvete Omnes,
> sorry, but I remember that in the beginning of December Caius Iulius
Marius
> sent a message withdrawling his candidacy as Quaestor. Why in the
official
> results he's winner?
>
> Marius is a my dear friend and we would likw to know is there is an
error.

Salve Franciscus Apulus Caesar,

The simple answer to this question is that his name was on the ballot
and he received sufficient votes to be elected.

Congratulations on you election as Tribune.

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18607 From: Livia Cornelia Hibernia Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Military Re-enactments
Salve Bianchius Rufinus

Yes, there is indeed a Buckeye unit.
The 1st Cohort of Ligio X Germania is being formed by
Marcus Scipio Africanus.

See the Sodalitas Militarium list (
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SodalitasMilitarium )
for messages 2331 through 2338 for more details and emails.

Bene Vale
Livia Cornelia Hibernia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, FrBryanReif@a... wrote:
> Salve,
>
> Does anyone know of a roman military unit or group re-enacting in
the mid-west United States, in Ohio particularly.
>
> Q. Bianchius Rufinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18608 From: Jean de Cabilis Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Short Introduction
Avte Diana

The reason you didn't find anything on the Order's website, is because
the SPQR work is a private working :-) Thanks for your message.

LLL
Jean

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Diana Moravia Aventina"
<diana@p...> wrote:
> Salve Jean,
>
> > Having just joined this group, a little self introduction for your
> > elections etc. My name Jean de Cabilis, profession=magickian. Ref:
> > http://custosi.topcities.com
>
> < I have being working on SPQR magick for
> > nearly a decade, that is working towards the rebuilding of the
> > Roman Empire and also its coming world leader.
>
> I looked at your website because I was curious to learn what 'SPQR
magick' is. I didn't find
> anything about Rome at all, but by reading the info for your
course, I see that you are a Golden
> Dawn magickal order. The Qabalah including its teachings on the
Tree of Life, the 32 Paths of
> Wisdom, the names of power, the angels, planetary magick, the
banishing rituals etc. are all Hebrew
> based mysticism. While I have always found it interesting (plus
extremely difficult & expensive for
> the equipment) I don't see the connection to Roman Religion at all.
>
> Feel free to pop in again and explain a bit!
>
> Thanks and vale,
> Diana Moravia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18609 From: Jean de Cabilis Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Short Introduction
Yes - thank you Quintus :-)

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
> Salve Diana,
>
> I think the gentleman meant that the God of Abraham was impressed
> enough to choose the efficient infrastructure of the Roman Empire
to
> send his Messiah and spread the teachings as well as allowing Rome
to
> be the big kid on the block for so long, even governing Judea. I'd
> take his comments has a complement and hats off to Rome.
>
> Thank you for your explanation on the magic.
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Diana Moravia Aventina"
> <diana@p...> wrote:
> > Salve Jean,
> >
> > > Having just joined this group, a little self introduction for
your
> > > elections etc. My name Jean de Cabilis, profession=magickian.
Ref:
> > > http://custosi.topcities.com
> >
> > < I have being working on SPQR magick for
> > > nearly a decade, that is working towards the rebuilding of the
> > > Roman Empire and also its coming world leader.
> >
> > I looked at your website because I was curious to learn
what 'SPQR
> magick' is. I didn't find
> > anything about Rome at all, but by reading the info for your
> course, I see that you are a Golden
> > Dawn magickal order. The Qabalah including its teachings on the
> Tree of Life, the 32 Paths of
> > Wisdom, the names of power, the angels, planetary magick, the
> banishing rituals etc. are all Hebrew
> > based mysticism. While I have always found it interesting (plus
> extremely difficult & expensive for
> > the equipment) I don't see the connection to Roman Religion at
all.
> >
> > Feel free to pop in again and explain a bit!
> >
> > Thanks and vale,
> > Diana Moravia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18610 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Congratulations
Salvete Omnes:

My sincere congratulations to the victors of this years elections.
I wish you the best in the New Year. I have a feeling of optimism.

Bene valete,
Pompeia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18611 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Religion in Nova Roma
Salve,
While I do honor the Gods of Roma(and reading as much as I can on the
Religio too) I am a Deist. The best way to explain a Deist's belief
is what Thomas Paine said "God Exists, and there it lies". Most of the
Founding Fathers of America were Deists. For more info on Deism go to
http://www.deistnet.com This link is for informational purposes only.
Deist's don't convert people or preach.


Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus

--
AIM: KSDeist
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18612 From: Jean de Cabilis Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Short Introduction - Citizen's Concerns
Hi Sabina

The website is not a reflection of my private SPQR work. Yes you are
correct in one sense though each one of those three religions
encompass each of the others. Just like Roma itself there are levels
upon levels for many things with many subtle interplays - especially
those concerning reality creation and reconstruction. You need to
look at the big picture long term, past today too EU(Americas)
political miltary growth, to a thousand years of new Roman rulership
(something in itself not to be sneered at) then The Revelation of
John (which is to be fitted into) and then .. more
reconstruction..... on an universal scale :-)

Firsty the Idea and then the process.

LLL
Jean

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "D Butler" <doris-butler@s...>
wrote:
> -Salvete Omnes!
>
> Please forgive me as I am not Religio, but Stoic.
>
> I would however like to request that the proper pontifical
> authorities review this website. I know of only one religion that
> foretells a coming world leader from Rome, that being in the final
> chapter of their holy book, and it definitely does not cast Rome in
a
> good light.
>
> Midwinter Best Wishes to Citizens of All Faiths (and of None)!
>
> --Sabina Cornelia Mima Polyglottos
>
>
>
> -- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Jean de Cabilis" <cabilis@s...>
> wrote:
> > Avete
> >
> > Having just joined this group, a little self introduction for your
> > elections etc. My name Jean de Cabilis, profession=magickian. Ref:
> > http://custosi.topcities.com I have being working on SPQR magick
> for
> > nearly a decade, that is working towards the rebuilding of the
> > Roman Empire and also its coming world leader. Perhaps with some
> > success. Roman Soul ID 333 O|||-- Present projects involve
> Sibylline
> > prophecies and any undercurrents within. Vote i support the
Senate
> > over the Caesar's whom i see as the corner stone of the ruin of
> Rome
> > and its Empire. Remember God choice Rome for Universal Church..
to
> > last forever. I wouldn't say that i am stagnant classical Rome
but
> > rather a visionary supporting SPQR and its ageless principles.
> >
> > I will check out this website from time to time when able. Thank
> > you.
> >
> > LLL
> > Jean
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18613 From: Jean de Cabilis Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Short Introduction - Citizen's Concerns
Absolutely Gaius, nor are there any references to disgard :-)

LLL
Jean

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, AthanasiosofSpfd@a... wrote:
> Salvete:
>
> I can attest that this website: [ http://custosi.topcities.com ]has
nothing whatsoever to do with the Religio Romana. It does appear to
be a carbon copy of other established ceremonial orders, Hermetic
Order of the Golden Dawn and Ordo Templi Orientis (www.otohq.org). I
would recommend that the citizens of Nova Roma disregard all
referenes of this website from anything dealing with the Religio.
>
> Valete:
>
> Gaius Modius Athanasius
> Fleman Pomonalis
>
>
> In a message dated 12/20/2003 11:03:52 AM Eastern Standard Time,
doris-butler@s... writes:
>
> > I would however like to request that the proper pontifical
> > authorities review this website. I know of only one religion
that
> > foretells a coming world leader from Rome, that being in the
final
> > chapter of their holy book, and it definitely does not cast
> > Rome in a
> > good light.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18614 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Question
Salve Luci Martiani,

> I did write to a number of Leaders.

I can only speak for myself, saying that I have not had any contact
with you before this.

> A number didn't bother to respond back, yet the posted on a few sites
> using the e-address that i sent it to.

Many of us use spam filters. E-mail from unknown addresses gets
placed in "held mail" folders, or something similar. It's possible
that you wrote to someone who uses something like that. I do, and
I know some citizens have had their mail inadvertently captured by
my filtering software until I was able to check and put them on my
"whitelist."

> I read and printed out a number of things off the Nova Roma site.

By all means, ask away.

> Also have a number of people that have a intrest in joining.

Invite them by. If they like what they find here they're welcome to
apply for citizenship.

> I believe that if there is a return to Roman Nationhood, I would move
> there and serve it in what ever way the senate wants me too ( yes
> even as a trash picker)

Well, don't quit your current job. While we do have a little bit of
land out in West Texas right now, it's not going to be developed into
any kind of place needing trash pickers any time soon. Our long term
goal of owning a plot of land of 108 acres is still a long way off.

> I am a pagen, I have been for a number of years. I firmly believe in
> fact and practice.

More power to you. We have a lot of pagans here, and a lot of people
of other spiritual paths as well.

> I am a former Military man, so I tend to see things in black and
> white. There is very little gray in the world of truth.

I'm a retired US Marine, and an officer in my state's Defense Force.
Perhaps I've seen different places than you have, but I have to say
that truth can be an elusive thing, and that things may not be quite
so black and white as they appear.

Vale,

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18615 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Salve Pompeia,

I am happy and feel nostelgic to see your postings on this list
again. All the best for the holidays and have a happy and prosperous
new year!

Quintus Lanius Paulinus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_cornelia"
<scriba_forum@h...> wrote:
> Salvete Omnes:
>
> My sincere congratulations to the victors of this years elections.
> I wish you the best in the New Year. I have a feeling of optimism.
>
> Bene valete,
> Pompeia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18616 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Religion in Nova Roma
Salva Pompeia

Our undoing? Not likely - those who are so intolerant that they cannot stomach the thought of a Christianized Roman will pack up and go away; those of us dedicated to both Roma and the Gods will of course stay.
The Religio is enshrined and protected in our Constitution, and the oaths of office deliberately designed to keep out the Fundies. That is far more legal protection than this Roman Pagan enjoys anywhere else - it's a safe bet my Homeowners Association would never go in for my keeping chickens to practice Augury for example - so as long as the Religio remains protected here, then here I shall remain.
The presence of such a diversity of people is refreshing, and so long as it doesn't tread on the Religio that's fine by me - one of my best friends here in NR is a Roman Catholic, and he is as fanatically Pro-Roman Everything (except the Religio, which he merely respects) as I am fanatically Pro-Polytheist, and yet we not only get along just fine, we actually joke about our differences: He calls it Xmas (in a respectful way) while I call it Ex-mas in that it holds no (Christian) religious significance for me. If you like the person, what difference do some differences make? If you don't like somebody here, then at least see that we're all here to rebuild the different aspects of Rome that we are each interested in.
It's really that simple.

Vale
~ Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus




-----Original Message-----
From: pompeia_cornelia <scriba_forum@...>
Sent: Dec 26, 2003 2:31 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Religion in Nova Roma

---
Salve Fr Bryan:

Very well stated sir. With some of my thoughts if I may:

Within the terms "Christianity" or "Christian" there lies quite a
diversity of beliefs, as doubtless the myriad of Pagan faiths do.
There are Christians who believe in intercessory prayer to saints and
some do not. Some believe in the trinity and some do not, some
believe in this and that. Yadda yadda.

That is why I chuckle when I see clergy of the Religio Romano and
other belief systems 'tell' me, and others what I can and cannot,
must and must not believe, because I believe in the divinity of
Christ. (sorry guys, but its true)

This seems to be pulled as a trump card every election year, sadly.
Some folks can't resist the temptation to make a religious royal
rumble instead of celebrating what we have in common. "You" have read
the website correctly, as it reads now. Others unfortunately, have not.

To me, there is often a fine line between saint and god/goddess.
Going back far enough in legend and folklore, Hermes is associated
with St. Michael the Archangel. St. Brigett was a goddess, and to
some, I imagine, as is Hermes (Mercury). I simply do not know enough
about 'whose who' in the cosmos to say who did and didn't, doesn't and
doesn't exist, and fighting about it is counterproductive to all.

I believe in the existance of Apollo from a couple of personal
experiences, but I do not hold him above almighty god, and he himself
answered to Zeus/Jupiter, so I don't imagine he's too upset about it.
I'm hardpressed to think Jesus is either (sigh).
I do not do the rituals of the RR, but being a total 'unbeliever' or
complete spiritual lepper is not an accurate appraisal either.

The prophetess in the Book of acts was likely suffering from the curse
of Cassandra in my view (the one Paul told to more or less, shut up),
to wit, she would speak the truth and nobody would believe her.

I do not hold any deity, angel or saint above almighty God, as defined
by my faith, but that is a far cry from being what a couple of posters
have dubbed an "unbeliever" in the Gods of Rome, a far cry from being
unappreciative of the influence of spirituality on the Roman
civilization, and a far cry from being incapable of upholding respect
for other's religious practises and a far cry from being able to
practise fairness and judgement based on the Roman virtues.

Christians here, as I've stated and restated ad nauseum, are not
hyperfundies who are trying to destroy the religious freedoms of those
who practise the RR or other pagan faith. They may not agree with it,
either all or in total, but they are not out to destroy anything. They
are here, largely because they love Rome. Period.

To some, and I say this with concern and nothing else, it is like
talking to the wall. Such arguments and misunderstandings could well
be our undoing, sadly.



Bene vale, and sorry to talk your ear off :)

Po







In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, FrBryanReif@a... wrote:
> Salve,
>
> One of the reasons that I joined Nova-Roma, was its clause within
its Constitution that all citizens of Nova Roma have freedom of
religion. If Nova Roma had required its citizens to be pagan, or
something else, joining would have been difficult for me. I was
pleased to find, and to join an openly Christian gens within the
Republic, and to become a citizen of Nova Roma, as I have an affinity
towards ancient Rome, its art, architecture, military history,
commerce, and culture. All of these and more, not just the Religio
are a part of Nova Roma's charter and greatness.
>
> One of the halmarks of the Roman Empire and Roman culture was its
tolerance of the many different religions that existed within its
sphere of influence. This included Judaism, and Christianity. Yes,
these were persecuted, but the persecutions of these faiths were not
as widespread as we may have been led to beleive. Most persecutions
were of a limited scope. In reality, these prospered in the Empire,
and even within Rome itself. Also, I might also point out that in 313,
Constantine did recognize Christianity as a credible religion in the
Empire. So Christianity was a part of the ancient Roman culture, and
does, and should have a place in the culture of Nova Roma as well (as
do, and should all others).
>
> Freedom of Religion, as stated within Nova Roma's constitution, is
an important element of the Roman Virtue of tolerance. Tolerance is
the key to peace in Nova Roma.
>
> Q. Bianchius Rufinus


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com




Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18617 From: rory12001 Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Salve Pompeia Cornelia;
and welcome back; May I also wish you, Quinus Lanius, Rufinus & all
our Christian Cives a Happy Christmas, & may I thank Calvus for his
regards for Channukah and if anyone wants to how a proud member of
the Jewish Sodalitas can fully support the Religio, let me just say I
am in the best sense, a Roman.

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
> Salve Pompeia,
>
> I am happy and feel nostelgic to see your postings on this list
> again. All the best for the holidays and have a happy and
prosperous
> new year!
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
>
>
> ---
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18618 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Magistrates and the Oath of Office
Salve Romans

First I must acknowledge my thanks to the Citizens of Nova Roma in electing me to serve as a Tribune for the year 2757.

Thank You

I have been following the main list discussion on magistrates who are not practitioners of the Religio Romana and would like to make a few points.

The constitution of Nova Roma EXPLICITLY acknowledges that there will be magistrates, Senators and citizens who are NOT practitioners of the Religio Romana.
The Constitution says in part VI. Public Religious Institutions
1.. The Religio Romana, the worship of the Gods and Goddesses of Rome, shall be the official religion of Nova Roma. All magistrates and Senators, as officers of the State, shall be required to publicly show respect for the Religio Romana and the Gods and Goddesses that made Rome great. Magistrates, Senators, and citizens need not be practitioners of the Religio Romana, but may not engage in any activity that intentionally blasphemes or defames the Gods, the Religio Romana, or its practitioners"
B. It further states that " Nova Roma shall approach all other religions with a syncretistic outlook, offering friendship to all paths which acknowledge the right of those who practice and honor the Religio Romana to do so and respect the beliefs...

Magistrates as has been noted are required to take the following oath upon entering office.

Section 1 of the oath states:

I, __enter legal and Roman name here ____________do hereby solemnly swear
to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests
of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

Nothing in this first section is in conflict with my personal religious beliefs and my taking it does not make me a hypocrite.

Section 2 of the oath states:

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, _______________________ swear to
honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to
pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

Again nothing in this section is in conflict with my personal religious beliefs UNLESS the word honor is meant to mean something more than to show the respect for the Religio Romana as called for in the Nova Roma constitution.

Section 3 of the oath states:

I, ___________ swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State
Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten
its status as the State Religion.

As I have no interest or desire to change the State Religion of Nova Roma I can with a clear conscience take this part of the oath.

The next three sections are clear cut and are standard in most oaths, in most nations for officials entering office and can be taken by all magistrate-elects.

I, _____________________swear to protect and defend the Constitution of
Nova Roma.

I, _____________________further swear to fulfill the obligations
and responsibilities of the office of ______________to the best of my
abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods
and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I
accept the position of_____________ and all the rights, privileges,
obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.

If my interpretation of the Oath of Office is wrong and can be shown to be a violation of Roman Catholic Religious doctrine and would make me the religious hypocrite as some have suggested, I will decline the honor of serving as a Tribune of the Plebs that the citizens have elected me to.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Tribune-Elect 2757



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18619 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Salve Pomponia,

Thank you for your kind words and wishes!

Quintus Lanius Paulinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> Salve Pompeia Cornelia;
> and welcome back; May I also wish you, Quinus Lanius, Rufinus &
all
> our Christian Cives a Happy Christmas, & may I thank Calvus for his
> regards for Channukah and if anyone wants to how a proud member of
> the Jewish Sodalitas can fully support the Religio, let me just say
I
> am in the best sense, a Roman.
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
> Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
> > Salve Pompeia,
> >
> > I am happy and feel nostelgic to see your postings on this list
> > again. All the best for the holidays and have a happy and
> prosperous
> > new year!
> >
> > Quintus Lanius Paulinus
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18620 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Results of Voting in the Centuriae and Tribus
Salve, Gaius Modius Athansius -

On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 10:08:21PM -0500, AthanasiosofSpfd@... wrote:
> Salve Pomponia Fabia Vera;
>
> I agree with you. Within the Religio it is about Orthopraxy, that is
> doing the rituals correctly. Belief is not paramount as action is.
> However...Christianity does not teach this. It is not acceptable for
> a Christian to "believe" in the existance of other Gods.

Really? I'm not Christian, but I'd certainly appreciate a citation of
proof for the above, one that applies to _all_ Christians, as per your
statement. You may well be quite knowledgeable in the Religio Romana,
but I very much doubt that you can claim the same for Christianity - and
I would appreciate your retracting that implied claim.

> Additionally, would Consul-elect Marinus be willing to sacrifice a
> bull (or other animal) to the Gods as the Consuls of antiqua would
> have done as part of their magisterial responsibility? Would the
> pastor of his Church find this OK?

Is this kind of fishing expedition into the specifics of a cive's
religious practice encouraged here in Nova Roma, or is this strictly
your own approach? I must say that I'm absolutely appalled in either
case: you speak as a representative of the Religio. I do not see that
you have the right to question *anyone's* contract with the Gods,
whatever it may be; it is an arrogation of the Gods' privileges to
yourself, and I find it inappropriate and highly offensive.

> Its not acceptable, in my eyes, for someone who is not a follower of
> the Religio to play "lip service" to the Gods as if they were a
> believer on this mailing list. If Marinus truly believes that Venus
> helped him win the election then I would EXPECT him to make a physical
> (not virtual) offering to her in thanks for such a blessing.

I don't know about Marinus, but I hope you _never_ express this sort of
expectations about my preferences and choices for worship. My connection
with the Gods is strictly between me and them, and attempts to mediate
are most highly unwelcome, to put it mildly.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Nosce te ipsum.
Know thyself.
-- Inscription at the temple of Apollo in Delphi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18621 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Salve, Quintus Lanius Paulinus:

On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 04:45:25PM -0000, Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) wrote:
>
> 3) Christians should have no problem in being respectful of other
> religions. Our first commandment says that " I shall have no "other
> gods before me" and this indicates to me that the god of Abraham says
> that there are other dieties out there. They do not worship the other
> gods personally but can respect the belief of others and behave
> properly at their public ceremonies and say a quiet personal prayer
> to themselves whilst the others are doing their thing.

Thank you, sir; that was my perception of this issue as believed by at
least a large percentage of Christians. "Thou shalt have no other gods
before me", as my copy of the KJV has it; not 'It is not acceptable for
a Christian to "believe" in the existance of other Gods'.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Claris maiorum exemplis.
After the forefathers' brilliant example.
-- Part of the inscription on the House of Nobility, Riddarhuset, in Stockholm.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18622 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Salve Pompeia,

> My sincere congratulations to the victors of this years elections.
> I wish you the best in the New Year. I have a feeling of optimism.

Thank you. It's good to see you back here in the forum.

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18623 From: Jean de Cabilis Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Short Introduction
Yes you are quite right Saturnalia, and yes i am quite aware of
everything you have said :-) I personally perfer Georg Luck
work 'Arcana Mundi' concerning the magick of the Roman world :-)which
i recommend if you have not read it. The website
has NOTHING to do with SPQR - i apologise for not making this
clearer. Thank you for your message.

LLL
Jean


ATURNALIA

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@a... wrote:
> F. Galerius Aurelianus Secundus to Jean the Magi. Salve.
>
> I have to agree with the Honorable Diana Moravia on this topic.
While the
> founders of the Golden Dawn did use certain Egyptian, Greek, and
Roman symbology
> in their rituals, the foundation of their magical system owed more
to Henry
> Cornelius Agrippa (15th C.) and Albertus Magnus. I would recommend
that you
> consider reading Graz's book on magic in the ancient world to get a
better
> understanding of the actual Greco-Roman magical techniques. Also,
please check
> out the Religio Romana section of the NR main site. You will
quickly discover
> that the tools and framework of Roman religion has very little in
common with
> Victorian magical systems. IO SATURNALIA.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18624 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: the ReligioBookGroup
Salve, Pomponia Fabia Vera:

On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 06:24:24PM -0000, rory12001 wrote:
> Salvete Quirites;
> everyone who is involved in this discussion should right now join;
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioBookGroup/
>
> where we right now have discussed these issues under the leadership
> of the Pontifex Maximus; & get John Scheid's "Roman Religion" which
> the PM & pontifeces regards as our handbook;
>
> p28 from Scheid;
> " Liberty, the sole article of faith.....
> The principle by which it {the Roman Religion) was ruled, in the
> historical period at least, was a civic rationality that guaranteed
> the liberty and dignity of its members both human and divine. That
> article of 'faith', virtually the only one known to Roman religion,
> was constantly affirmed and defended by authorities and thinkers
> alike....
> In the name of the same principle, people could all honour the gods
> and practise whatever cults they chose, providing they respected the
> public cult and its pre-eminence, public order, and the liberty of
> others."
>
> Quirites we must live the above if Nova Roma is to be a civil
> society,

My deepest thanks, Pomponia. If this, or something similar, is indeed
the view of the Pontifex Maximus and most of the people within the
Religio, then my concerns are allayed. Religious intolerance is
poisonous and vile, and deserves only condemnation and scorn.


Optime vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tamdiu discendum est, quamdiu vivas.
We should learn as long as we may live. (We live and learn.)
-- Seneca Philosophus, "Epistulae"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18625 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Congratulations
---Well, thank ya darlin!

Seriously, good to see your posts too, Quinte.

Po


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
> Salve Pompeia,
>
> I am happy and feel nostelgic to see your postings on this list
> again. All the best for the holidays and have a happy and prosperous
> new year!
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_cornelia"
> <scriba_forum@h...> wrote:
> > Salvete Omnes:
> >
> > My sincere congratulations to the victors of this years elections.
> > I wish you the best in the New Year. I have a feeling of optimism.
> >
> > Bene valete,
> > Pompeia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18626 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Caius Minucius Scaevola wrote:

> Salve, Quintus Lanius Paulinus:
>
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 04:45:25PM -0000, Quintus Lanius Paulinus
> (Michael Kelly) wrote:
> >
> > 3) Christians should have no problem in being respectful of other
> > religions. Our first commandment says that " I shall have no "other
> > gods before me" and this indicates to me that the god of Abraham says
> > that there are other dieties out there. They do not worship the other
> > gods personally but can respect the belief of others and behave
> > properly at their public ceremonies and say a quiet personal prayer
> > to themselves whilst the others are doing their thing.
>
> Thank you, sir; that was my perception of this issue as believed by at
> least a large percentage of Christians. "Thou shalt have no other gods
> before me", as my copy of the KJV has it; not 'It is not acceptable for
> a Christian to "believe" in the existance of other Gods'.

If you break out that KJV you will discover that the 10 Comandments were
addressed to the Jewish people, Not to mankind as a whole.

"I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of
Egypt, out of the house of bondage."
Exodus 20:2

If you go to the new Testament you will find the following on the
subject of Sacrifices.

"But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice
to devils, and not to God: and I would not that ye should have
fellowship with devils"
1st Corinthians 10:20

In a Roman system of Government Magistrates are expected to perform
reliogus rituals at certain times. A Consul's duties start with
observance of the Auspices the night before they assume the powers of
their office and their first offical act is performing a sacrifice to
Iupiter Optimus Maximus.

In a Roman system the Consul's duties include performing Religous
Rituals that are needed to maintain the Pax Deorum. If a persons
Religous beliefs prohibit them from performing these obligations
attached to their office then they are a danger to the Res Publica
because of their inability to maintain the Pax Deorum and retain the
favor of the Immortals.

There is clearly a conflict between the duties of a magistrate in a
Roman system of government and the modernist desire of not
"discriminating" going to the extent of ignoring some of the duties of
an office so that a person's personal religion won't be a bar to them
assuming an office.

L. Sicinius Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18627 From: pompeia_cornelia Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Religion in Nova Roma
---

Salve Servi Equiti:

I think essentially you and I are saying the same things, basically,
only choosing different vocab.

Suffice it to say that hyperfundies of any walk of life, be they
political, religious, fashion-fanatic, whatever, have a difficult time
lending themselves to the viewpoints or visions of others. They become
quickly dissappointed by the presentations of others, and have
difficulty coping with this, giving way to conflict. If I made it
sound like the only fundies of creation are pagans, my dear, I didn't
mean that.

My point is, the Christians in NR are not all the same,demonination
wise, and they don't hang around too long if they are distressed by
the existance of other religions, so the majority of veteran Christian
NR citizens, Jewish citizens, etc. can hardly be considered fundie in
their approach, although I am keenly aware the world has quite an
abundance of very fundamentalist Christians .

Hey, those folks look at me like I have three heads too, so, well, get
in line I guess.

You take care and Happy Holidays and New Year!

Po

We have our fair shair of fundies from Christianity and other walks of
life...yes indeedy :)

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus
<hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
> Salva Pompeia
>
> Our undoing? Not likely - those who are so intolerant that they
cannot stomach the thought of a Christianized Roman will pack up and
go away; those of us dedicated to both Roma and the Gods will of
course stay.
> The Religio is enshrined and protected in our Constitution, and
the oaths of office deliberately designed to keep out the Fundies.
That is far more legal protection than this Roman Pagan enjoys
anywhere else - it's a safe bet my Homeowners Association would never
go in for my keeping chickens to practice Augury for example - so as
long as the Religio remains protected here, then here I shall remain.
> The presence of such a diversity of people is refreshing, and so
long as it doesn't tread on the Religio that's fine by me - one of my
best friends here in NR is a Roman Catholic, and he is as fanatically
Pro-Roman Everything (except the Religio, which he merely respects) as
I am fanatically Pro-Polytheist, and yet we not only get along just
fine, we actually joke about our differences: He calls it Xmas (in a
respectful way) while I call it Ex-mas in that it holds no (Christian)
religious significance for me. If you like the person, what
difference do some differences make? If you don't like somebody here,
then at least see that we're all here to rebuild the different aspects
of Rome that we are each interested in.
> It's really that simple.
>
> Vale
> ~ Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pompeia_cornelia <scriba_forum@h...>
> Sent: Dec 26, 2003 2:31 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Religion in Nova Roma
>
> ---
> Salve Fr Bryan:
>
> Very well stated sir. With some of my thoughts if I may:
>
> Within the terms "Christianity" or "Christian" there lies quite a
> diversity of beliefs, as doubtless the myriad of Pagan faiths do.
> There are Christians who believe in intercessory prayer to saints and
> some do not. Some believe in the trinity and some do not, some
> believe in this and that. Yadda yadda.
>
> That is why I chuckle when I see clergy of the Religio Romano and
> other belief systems 'tell' me, and others what I can and cannot,
> must and must not believe, because I believe in the divinity of
> Christ. (sorry guys, but its true)
>
> This seems to be pulled as a trump card every election year, sadly.
> Some folks can't resist the temptation to make a religious royal
> rumble instead of celebrating what we have in common. "You" have read
> the website correctly, as it reads now. Others unfortunately, have
not.
>
> To me, there is often a fine line between saint and god/goddess.
> Going back far enough in legend and folklore, Hermes is associated
> with St. Michael the Archangel. St. Brigett was a goddess, and to
> some, I imagine, as is Hermes (Mercury). I simply do not know enough
> about 'whose who' in the cosmos to say who did and didn't, doesn't and
> doesn't exist, and fighting about it is counterproductive to all.
>
> I believe in the existance of Apollo from a couple of personal
> experiences, but I do not hold him above almighty god, and he himself
> answered to Zeus/Jupiter, so I don't imagine he's too upset about it.
> I'm hardpressed to think Jesus is either (sigh).
> I do not do the rituals of the RR, but being a total 'unbeliever' or
> complete spiritual lepper is not an accurate appraisal either.
>
> The prophetess in the Book of acts was likely suffering from the curse
> of Cassandra in my view (the one Paul told to more or less, shut up),
> to wit, she would speak the truth and nobody would believe her.
>
> I do not hold any deity, angel or saint above almighty God, as defined
> by my faith, but that is a far cry from being what a couple of posters
> have dubbed an "unbeliever" in the Gods of Rome, a far cry from being
> unappreciative of the influence of spirituality on the Roman
> civilization, and a far cry from being incapable of upholding respect
> for other's religious practises and a far cry from being able to
> practise fairness and judgement based on the Roman virtues.
>
> Christians here, as I've stated and restated ad nauseum, are not
> hyperfundies who are trying to destroy the religious freedoms of those
> who practise the RR or other pagan faith. They may not agree with it,
> either all or in total, but they are not out to destroy anything. They
> are here, largely because they love Rome. Period.
>
> To some, and I say this with concern and nothing else, it is like
> talking to the wall. Such arguments and misunderstandings could well
> be our undoing, sadly.
>
>
>
> Bene vale, and sorry to talk your ear off :)
>
> Po
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, FrBryanReif@a... wrote:
> > Salve,
> >
> > One of the reasons that I joined Nova-Roma, was its clause within
> its Constitution that all citizens of Nova Roma have freedom of
> religion. If Nova Roma had required its citizens to be pagan, or
> something else, joining would have been difficult for me. I was
> pleased to find, and to join an openly Christian gens within the
> Republic, and to become a citizen of Nova Roma, as I have an affinity
> towards ancient Rome, its art, architecture, military history,
> commerce, and culture. All of these and more, not just the Religio
> are a part of Nova Roma's charter and greatness.
> >
> > One of the halmarks of the Roman Empire and Roman culture was its
> tolerance of the many different religions that existed within its
> sphere of influence. This included Judaism, and Christianity. Yes,
> these were persecuted, but the persecutions of these faiths were not
> as widespread as we may have been led to beleive. Most persecutions
> were of a limited scope. In reality, these prospered in the Empire,
> and even within Rome itself. Also, I might also point out that in 313,
> Constantine did recognize Christianity as a credible religion in the
> Empire. So Christianity was a part of the ancient Roman culture, and
> does, and should have a place in the culture of Nova Roma as well (as
> do, and should all others).
> >
> > Freedom of Religion, as stated within Nova Roma's constitution, is
> an important element of the Roman Virtue of tolerance. Tolerance is
> the key to peace in Nova Roma.
> >
> > Q. Bianchius Rufinus
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18628 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Question
Salve, Decius Iunius Palladius -

On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 06:48:23PM -0000, deciusiunius wrote:
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Bill Gawne <gawne@c...> wrote:
>
> > Have you read our Declaration? The recreation of the Religio Romana
> > is indeed one of the reasons for the establishment of Nova Roma, but
> > it is not the only reason. Just as with Roma Antiqua, we have many
> > reasons for being. Our common interest is to restore respect for
> >Rome's greatness in the modern world.
>
> It's not our only reason but it is the *central* reason. Nova Roma
> was founded by Roman pagans to revive the Religio, plain and simple.
> Everything else is just window dressing or icing on the cake,
> whichever cliche you prefer.

The "window dressing" you're so disparaging of seems to be the central
reason that most people join Nova Roma these days; I note that even the
front page of the NR site lists the Roman influence on civilization and
the Virtues before the Religio, and the main page shows it as only one
of three reasons for its existence. Whatever may have been the original
motivations of its founders, the reality of Nova Roma's existence is
different - and I, for one, would appreciate it if you didn't refer to
non-Religio people in such demeaning terms.

A Nova Roma where one and only one religion was allowed is one I would
_never_ have joined.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori.
It is sweet and glorious to die for one's country.
-- Horace, "Carmina"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18629 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Salvete Quirites, et salve Deci Iuni,

[snipping much, and thanks for the clarification of Catholic
vocabulary]

I'd written:
>>I ask, in all kindness and sincerity, why your opinion has any
>>bearing on my spirituality? If I pour out a libation to Thor, just
>>using him as an example for the moment, isn't the worth of the
>>offering between him and me? If he finds my offering sincere, then
>>that's enough. If he doesn't, then no amount of posturing on my
>>part will make him change his mind.

Decimus Iunius replied:
> Well, because you are an officer in an organization whose main goal
> and raison d'etre is to revive and promote the Religio Romana.

Y'know, I just looked at the Declaration of Nova Roma and the
Preamble of the Constitution, and neither of them says that.

From the Declaration:

> We, the Senate and People of New Rome, in order to restore
> the foundations of Western Civilization, declare the founding
> of Nova Roma as a soverign Nation. We manifest Nova Roma as an
> independent world nation and republic, with its own legal
> constitution and lawful government, with all international
> rights and responsibilities that such status carries.
[...]
> Citizenship in Nova Roma is open to people of all nationalities
> and races. The express purpose of our nation is to promote
> international understanding and cooperation through the preservation
> of our common Classical foundation, and to breathe new life and honor
> into all Western Civilization through the restoration of ancient Piety,
> Virtue, and Civilitas.


http://novaroma.org/tabularium/declaration_novaroma.html

I'm here to restore the foundations of Western Civilization,
to promote international understanding, and cooperation through
the preservation of our common Classical foundation. I'm here
to breathe new life and honor into all Western Civilization via
Piety, Virtue, and Civilitas.

I respect the Religio Romana as our state religion. I honor the
Capitoline gods and goddesses. But I do not agree that the main
goal and raison d'etre of Nova Roma is the revival and promotion
of the Religio. That's not what the Declaration says, and it's
not what the Constitution says. It's not what *I* joined for, nor
is it what I've served for.

> Magistracies are semi-religious in nature, there is no escaping the
> fact,

Yes, in those cases where the Constitution so specifies.

> You have never posted anything about the religio before or made
> reference towards any deity that I recall, so your recents spate of
> posts with religious references have the *appearance* of posturing.

Spate? What spate? Yesterday I replied to Diana's post about her
religious experience with an "Ave" for her goddess. Since then I've
written a few things to address the questions some people have had,
and answered others off-list in order to keep the volume of the
discussion as limited as possible.

> I say appearance becaue no one can look inside you so we judge you by
> your words and deeds. Your posts did not help; you are not RR

How do you know what I am or am not? Do I have to be baptized
or confirmed in the Religio Romana to be a practitioner? Will
the Office of the Inquisition come calling on me to insure my
proper actions?

> so it appeared you were being insincere--political posturing.

Of all the political posturing I've seen in the last year, the
vast majority of it left unaddressed by you, this is an absurd
statement Palladius. Diana told me her goddess had given me a
gift. I was being *thankful* and *respectful.* That's not
posturing, it's civility.

Enough. I need to go get a prescription for my granddaughter.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18630 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Religion in Nova Roma
Salva Pompeia ~

Yup, we're in agreement, all right. The only thing I was disagreeing with was the possibility that strife could be the end of us: Those who can't take it, leave. My understanding of NR History, limited as it is, is that there have been periodic mass departures before, yet the Republic endures.
When I finally got decent Internet access 3 months ago and went in search of my co-religionists, every serious polytheistic site pointed me here, once I explained my religious views. No sign whatsoever of the mass-departurists; maybe they're organized, but they haven't earned the reputation to have people referred to them that NR enjoys. That says a lot for NRs stability.
The only other point we had in variance was my caveat that the Religio must remain protected and enjoy a place of honour with in the Republic; to do otherwise would no longer be the Republic Reborn but Byzantium Reborn, which is NOT for me. That is not just my personal opinion, it is central to our Mission Statement; anyone who doesn't want to at least give nodding respect to the Religio is cordially invited, with no ill feelings, to depart and go found their own Neo Constantinopolis somewhere.
Other than that one caveat, then the more the merrier, I say. It's fine with me if someone only comes for the Classical Study of Literature - that person may very well become the founder of our Republic's "Library of Alexandria". Whatever their Roman interest, come on in, apply for Citizenship - we are enriched by the diversity!
Just respect the Religio.

Vale
~ Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus

-----Original Message-----
From: pompeia_cornelia <scriba_forum@...>
Sent: Dec 26, 2003 4:21 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Religion in Nova Roma

---

Salve Servi Equiti:

I think essentially you and I are saying the same things, basically,
only choosing different vocab.

Suffice it to say that hyperfundies of any walk of life, be they
political, religious, fashion-fanatic, whatever, have a difficult time
lending themselves to the viewpoints or visions of others. They become
quickly dissappointed by the presentations of others, and have
difficulty coping with this, giving way to conflict. If I made it
sound like the only fundies of creation are pagans, my dear, I didn't
mean that.

My point is, the Christians in NR are not all the same,demonination
wise, and they don't hang around too long if they are distressed by
the existance of other religions, so the majority of veteran Christian
NR citizens, Jewish citizens, etc. can hardly be considered fundie in
their approach, although I am keenly aware the world has quite an
abundance of very fundamentalist Christians .

Hey, those folks look at me like I have three heads too, so, well, get
in line I guess.

You take care and Happy Holidays and New Year!

Po

We have our fair shair of fundies from Christianity and other walks of
life...yes indeedy :)

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus
<hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
> Salva Pompeia
>
> Our undoing? Not likely - those who are so intolerant that they
cannot stomach the thought of a Christianized Roman will pack up and
go away; those of us dedicated to both Roma and the Gods will of
course stay.
> The Religio is enshrined and protected in our Constitution, and
the oaths of office deliberately designed to keep out the Fundies.
That is far more legal protection than this Roman Pagan enjoys
anywhere else - it's a safe bet my Homeowners Association would never
go in for my keeping chickens to practice Augury for example - so as
long as the Religio remains protected here, then here I shall remain.
> The presence of such a diversity of people is refreshing, and so
long as it doesn't tread on the Religio that's fine by me - one of my
best friends here in NR is a Roman Catholic, and he is as fanatically
Pro-Roman Everything (except the Religio, which he merely respects) as
I am fanatically Pro-Polytheist, and yet we not only get along just
fine, we actually joke about our differences: He calls it Xmas (in a
respectful way) while I call it Ex-mas in that it holds no (Christian)
religious significance for me. If you like the person, what
difference do some differences make? If you don't like somebody here,
then at least see that we're all here to rebuild the different aspects
of Rome that we are each interested in.
> It's really that simple.
>
> Vale
> ~ Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pompeia_cornelia <scriba_forum@h...>
> Sent: Dec 26, 2003 2:31 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Religion in Nova Roma
>
> ---
> Salve Fr Bryan:
>
> Very well stated sir. With some of my thoughts if I may:
>
> Within the terms "Christianity" or "Christian" there lies quite a
> diversity of beliefs, as doubtless the myriad of Pagan faiths do.
> There are Christians who believe in intercessory prayer to saints and
> some do not. Some believe in the trinity and some do not, some
> believe in this and that. Yadda yadda.
>
> That is why I chuckle when I see clergy of the Religio Romano and
> other belief systems 'tell' me, and others what I can and cannot,
> must and must not believe, because I believe in the divinity of
> Christ. (sorry guys, but its true)
>
> This seems to be pulled as a trump card every election year, sadly.
> Some folks can't resist the temptation to make a religious royal
> rumble instead of celebrating what we have in common. "You" have read
> the website correctly, as it reads now. Others unfortunately, have
not.
>
> To me, there is often a fine line between saint and god/goddess.
> Going back far enough in legend and folklore, Hermes is associated
> with St. Michael the Archangel. St. Brigett was a goddess, and to
> some, I imagine, as is Hermes (Mercury). I simply do not know enough
> about 'whose who' in the cosmos to say who did and didn't, doesn't and
> doesn't exist, and fighting about it is counterproductive to all.
>
> I believe in the existance of Apollo from a couple of personal
> experiences, but I do not hold him above almighty god, and he himself
> answered to Zeus/Jupiter, so I don't imagine he's too upset about it.
> I'm hardpressed to think Jesus is either (sigh).
> I do not do the rituals of the RR, but being a total 'unbeliever' or
> complete spiritual lepper is not an accurate appraisal either.
>
> The prophetess in the Book of acts was likely suffering from the curse
> of Cassandra in my view (the one Paul told to more or less, shut up),
> to wit, she would speak the truth and nobody would believe her.
>
> I do not hold any deity, angel or saint above almighty God, as defined
> by my faith, but that is a far cry from being what a couple of posters
> have dubbed an "unbeliever" in the Gods of Rome, a far cry from being
> unappreciative of the influence of spirituality on the Roman
> civilization, and a far cry from being incapable of upholding respect
> for other's religious practises and a far cry from being able to
> practise fairness and judgement based on the Roman virtues.
>
> Christians here, as I've stated and restated ad nauseum, are not
> hyperfundies who are trying to destroy the religious freedoms of those
> who practise the RR or other pagan faith. They may not agree with it,
> either all or in total, but they are not out to destroy anything. They
> are here, largely because they love Rome. Period.
>
> To some, and I say this with concern and nothing else, it is like
> talking to the wall. Such arguments and misunderstandings could well
> be our undoing, sadly.
>
>
>
> Bene vale, and sorry to talk your ear off :)
>
> Po
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, FrBryanReif@a... wrote:
> > Salve,
> >
> > One of the reasons that I joined Nova-Roma, was its clause within
> its Constitution that all citizens of Nova Roma have freedom of
> religion. If Nova Roma had required its citizens to be pagan, or
> something else, joining would have been difficult for me. I was
> pleased to find, and to join an openly Christian gens within the
> Republic, and to become a citizen of Nova Roma, as I have an affinity
> towards ancient Rome, its art, architecture, military history,
> commerce, and culture. All of these and more, not just the Religio
> are a part of Nova Roma's charter and greatness.
> >
> > One of the halmarks of the Roman Empire and Roman culture was its
> tolerance of the many different religions that existed within its
> sphere of influence. This included Judaism, and Christianity. Yes,
> these were persecuted, but the persecutions of these faiths were not
> as widespread as we may have been led to beleive. Most persecutions
> were of a limited scope. In reality, these prospered in the Empire,
> and even within Rome itself. Also, I might also point out that in 313,
> Constantine did recognize Christianity as a credible religion in the
> Empire. So Christianity was a part of the ancient Roman culture, and
> does, and should have a place in the culture of Nova Roma as well (as
> do, and should all others).
> >
> > Freedom of Religion, as stated within Nova Roma's constitution, is
> an important element of the Roman Virtue of tolerance. Tolerance is
> the key to peace in Nova Roma.
> >
> > Q. Bianchius Rufinus
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18631 From: Shane Evans Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Military Re-enactments
We are forming a Legion in Ohio. Please contact me
privately and I will give you more information.


--- FrBryanReif@... wrote:
> Salve,
>
> Does anyone know of a roman military unit or group
> re-enacting in the mid-west United States, in Ohio
> particularly.
>
> Q. Bianchius Rufinus
>


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18632 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:

> Salvete Quirites, et salve Deci Iuni,
>
> [snipping much, and thanks for the clarification of Catholic
> vocabulary]
>
> I'd written:
> >>I ask, in all kindness and sincerity, why your opinion has any
> >>bearing on my spirituality? If I pour out a libation to Thor, just
> >>using him as an example for the moment, isn't the worth of the
> >>offering between him and me? If he finds my offering sincere, then
> >>that's enough. If he doesn't, then no amount of posturing on my
> >>part will make him change his mind.
>
> Decimus Iunius replied:
> > Well, because you are an officer in an organization whose main goal
> > and raison d'etre is to revive and promote the Religio Romana.
>
> Y'know, I just looked at the Declaration of Nova Roma and the
> Preamble of the Constitution, and neither of them says that.

Excuse me, but I think that someone who was a citizen on the first day
of Nova Roma's existance would know why the organization was founded.
http://www.novaroma.org/bin/view?id=17

L. Sicinius Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18633 From: David Bustillos Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Question
Semper Fi.
Lucius Martianus Paullus
----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Gawne
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Question


Salve Luci Martiani,

> I did write to a number of Leaders.

I can only speak for myself, saying that I have not had any contact
with you before this.

> A number didn't bother to respond back, yet the posted on a few sites
> using the e-address that i sent it to.

Many of us use spam filters. E-mail from unknown addresses gets
placed in "held mail" folders, or something similar. It's possible
that you wrote to someone who uses something like that. I do, and
I know some citizens have had their mail inadvertently captured by
my filtering software until I was able to check and put them on my
"whitelist."

> I read and printed out a number of things off the Nova Roma site.

By all means, ask away.

> Also have a number of people that have a intrest in joining.

Invite them by. If they like what they find here they're welcome to
apply for citizenship.

> I believe that if there is a return to Roman Nationhood, I would move
> there and serve it in what ever way the senate wants me too ( yes
> even as a trash picker)

Well, don't quit your current job. While we do have a little bit of
land out in West Texas right now, it's not going to be developed into
any kind of place needing trash pickers any time soon. Our long term
goal of owning a plot of land of 108 acres is still a long way off.

> I am a pagen, I have been for a number of years. I firmly believe in
> fact and practice.

More power to you. We have a lot of pagans here, and a lot of people
of other spiritual paths as well.

> I am a former Military man, so I tend to see things in black and
> white. There is very little gray in the world of truth.

I'm a retired US Marine, and an officer in my state's Defense Force.
Perhaps I've seen different places than you have, but I have to say
that truth can be an elusive thing, and that things may not be quite
so black and white as they appear.

Vale,

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18634 From: daniel villanueva Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Congratulations new plebeians magistrates
Ex domo Tribuni plebis L. Pompeius Octavianus novissimi magistratis plebeiis S.P.D.

Ego vos gratulor O novissimi magistrati Plebeii.
Habeatis fortunam optimam.

L. Pompeius Octavianus



Ego sidera stellasque amo et semper amabo. Atque Romam antiquam.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18635 From: daniel villanueva Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Congratulations
Salvete omnes.
Congratulations to all the newly elected magistrates!.
Cheers!
Bene valete
L. Pompeius Octavianus


Ego sidera stellasque amo et semper amabo. Atque Romam antiquam.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18636 From: Neil Lucock Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
On Fri, 2003-12-26 at 18:15, Livia Cornelia Hibernia wrote:

> > [...snipped...]
> >How much confidence would you have in a person who is willing to
> >ignore an important part of their chosen religion in order to
> >be a politician?
> [...snipped...]
> Do you mean like the many Catholic politicians who ignore the
> teachings of the Church and edicts of the Pope to support divorce and
> a woman's legal right to an abortion? Personally, I respect them more
> than I do someone who has given over their though process to
> religious leader or who is using such religious issues to garner more
> votes in the next election.
Salvete,
personally, I very much approve of those kind of people, (because they
think for themselves) but it's strange when members of a religion have
to go against their church's teachings in order to do the right thing.
> Classical Greco-Roman Polytheism was not the kind of dogmatic,
> orthodoxic religions that we see in the modern world. So long as the
> public rituals were correctly performed, the gods and the people were
> happy.
snip
The point was that Christianity forbids this (pragmatic) attitude.
Christians who disobey the direct commandments of their god are being
inconsistant. How much trust would you have if someone said they were a
Jew or Muslim and then ate bacon? It's central to Judaism, Islam and
Christianity that you can't worship other gods. Nova Roma requires its
public officials to worship Roman gods. If they are Christians, they are
poor representatives of their religion. I said that this was hypocracy,
I still feel this to be true.
The Jews had exactly the same problem with the Romans and the whole
country went on strike rather than have Roman Gods in their temples.They
were crushed, but at least they were consistant and kept their faith,
and I respect their sincere attitude.
valete
Gaius Cornelius Severus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18637 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Religion in Nova Roma
In a message dated 12/26/03 10:40:29 AM Pacific Standard Time,
FrBryanReif@... writes:


> One of the reasons that I joined Nova-Roma, was its clause within its
> Constitution that all citizens of Nova Roma have freedom of religion. If Nova
> Roma had required its citizens to be pagan, or something else, joining would
> have been difficult for me. I was pleased to find, and to join an openly
> Christian gens within the Republic, and to become a citizen of Nova Roma, as I have
> an affinity towards ancient Rome, its art, architecture, military history,
> commerce, and culture. All of these and more, not just the Religio are a part
> of Nova Roma's charter and greatness.


Salve Fr. Byan

Yet all of this came about because of the Religio, not in spite of it like
you seemingly indicate.

>
> One of the halmarks of the Roman Empire and Roman culture was its tolerance
> of the many different religions that existed within its sphere of influence.
> This included Judaism, and Christianity. Yes, these were persecuted, but
> the persecutions of these faiths were not as widespread as we may have been led
> to beleive. Most persecutions were of a limited scope. In reality, these
> prospered in the Empire, and even within Rome itself.

The intelligent Romans were completely baffled by Christianity as practiced.
While Romans believed that all religions had a place in the Empire they did
make certain demands on the practitioners. The Christians were unwilling to
sacrifice to the Imperial Cult, and denounced certain Roman practices publicly.
It didn't help that the cult apparently had strange practices that were
twisted into the weirdest rumors. Unlike the Jewish Religion that most Romans
first thought Christianity was a part of, Christianity came to viewed as an
orgastic religion, one that should be banned. There would have been no Christianity
during the Republic.
The Senate would assume that Palestine would keep the followers of this "Son"
in check.
When they failed the Senate would have banned the religion and deported its
followers.

Also, I might also point out that in 313, Constantine did recognize
Christianity as a
> credible religion in the Empire.

Two reasons why Constantine recognized Christianity. His dis placed Syrian
soldiers were practicing it, as well as Mithraism, and he wanted to keep his
soldiers happy, and used the fervor as propaganda to inspire his Christians to
win Milvian Bridge and make him sole Emperor. Second, he saw that there was
wealth to made from these churches. He allowed churches to be built openly for
the first time and taxed them for operating. He was never a Christian, never
espoused Christian thought. Nor was he a follower of the old Gods.
He was at best what I would call an opportunist. He would use any means
available to further
his advance.

So Christianity was a part of the ancient Roman culture, and does, and should

> have a place in the culture of Nova Roma as well (as do, and should all
> others).
>

Christianity helped destroy the Roman Empire. It also helped preserve its
history, through copying of its rituals and ceremonies, retaining a few texts
that the Bishops felt were non harmful, and worth keeping, since the Bishops
themselves were in need of intellectual stimulation. However it destroyed the
bulk of a nation's 1000 years of philosophy, intellectual prose and fiction
because it was scared of the competition.

> Freedom of Religion, as stated within Nova Roma's constitution, is an
> important element of the Roman Virtue of tolerance. Tolerance is the key to peace
> in Nova Roma.
>


True. But start evangelizing in the Forum and you will find your stay here
very short. Freedom means just that, you are free to believe what you want
privately. You interfere with
the State Religio of Nova Roma and there will be consequences.

Vale
Q. Fabius Maximus
Pontiff


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18638 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Congratulations
daniel villanueva wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes.
> Congratulations to all the newly elected magistrates!.
> Cheers!
> Bene valete
> L. Pompeius Octavianus

Thank you Lucius Pompeius!

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18639 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Religious Belief and Religious Practice
G. Iulius Scaurus S. P. D.

Salvete, Quirites.

As a matter of religious law the personal beliefs of an individual are
irrelevant to the efficacy of a caerimonium properly offered to the
Gods. This has always been the case in the Religio Romana. When
Titus Lucretius Carus sacrificed as a Vigintisexvir, if the sacrifice
was done properly it was appropriate and efficacious despite the fact
that many think the Epicurean philosopher and poet was an atheist (I
happen to think the matter of his beliefs is somewhat more
complicated, but that is another discussion).

I believe that Gn. Equitius' remarks to D. Moravia regarding thanks to
Venus were well-intended and not a hypocritical use of religion for
insult. While I can peer into no one's heeart but my own, I have
discussed religious matters with Gn. Equitius and know that he is not
what I would characterise as an orthodox Christian and that his his
religious beliefs have a place for due and sincere honour to the Di
Immortales (recall that Severus Alexander's bedchamber contined images
of all the Gods and that he included a statue of Jesus of Nazareth
among them). That is a more syncretistic view than I would ever
accept for myself, but it is the place of no Roman to play inquisitor
as to another Roman's beliefs. If a man says he sincerely thanks
Venus, then I believe him. If he does so hypocritically, Venus will
deal with the matter far more effectively than I could ever hope to do
so. Sworn oaths are a different matter in terms of the words binding
the oathgiver to specific beliefs as necessary conditions for the
oath's fulfillment, but that is not at issue here.

If someone had sneeringly posted "look how good much your Venus did
for you," that chap and I would be having a stern chat about attitude
readjustment, but Gn. Equitius did nothing of the sort. If a faux pas
was committed, then I am certain Gn. Equitius will apologise, but I
certainly do not think any offence was intended.

We must be more accepting of genuine efforts to show respect to each
others' religious traditions or we shall be imitating in short order
the Arians and Athanasians under Constantius (no allusion to the
cognomen of a Flamen intended :-).

Valete.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18640 From: lanius117@aol.com Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Congratulations
G. Lanius Falco Quiritibus SPD

Salvete

I would like to offer my hearty congratulations to all newly elected
officials of Nova Roma. May your endeavors in the coming year serve NR to their
fullest, and may NR continue to prosper and grow.

Valete,

G. Lanius Falco



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18641 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Religious Belief and Religious Practice
Salve Gai Iuli, et salvete quirites,

Gaius Iulius Scaurus wrote:
> I believe that Gn. Equitius' remarks to D. Moravia regarding thanks to
> Venus were well-intended and not a hypocritical use of religion for
> insult. While I can peer into no one's heart but my own, I have
> discussed religious matters with Gn. Equitius and know that he is not
> what I would characterise as an orthodox Christian and that his
> religious beliefs have a place for due and sincere honour to the Di
> Immortales

Indeed.

Thanks for taking time out from visiting with your relatives to put
a word in here. It's reassuring to have my ideas about my approach
to the Religio confirmed by you.

I hope you're enjoying a pleasant visit. I look forward to your return
after you get home, and the opportunity for learning that you always
provide.

Valete,

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18642 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-26
Subject: Re: Religious Belief and Religious Practice
Salvete omnes,

I just wanted to suggest that in future, for those Nova Romans who
are not RR practioners holding any magisterial offices or civil
service positions that it would be a very good idea to consult our
pontiffs and our Roman religion experts prior to making any
statements or partaking in any actions that involve or affect the
religion directly or indirectly. I cannot help but notice that the
priests of NR are very fast at getting back to us and that should
keep these people off thin ice.

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "g_iulius_scaurus" <gfr@w...> wrote:
> G. Iulius Scaurus S. P. D.
>
> Salvete, Quirites.
>
> As a matter of religious law the personal beliefs of an individual
are
> irrelevant to the efficacy of a caerimonium properly offered to the
> Gods. This has always been the case in the Religio Romana. When
> Titus Lucretius Carus sacrificed as a Vigintisexvir, if the
sacrifice
> was done properly it was appropriate and efficacious despite the
fact
> that many think the Epicurean philosopher and poet was an atheist (I
> happen to think the matter of his beliefs is somewhat more
> complicated, but that is another discussion).
>
> I believe that Gn. Equitius' remarks to D. Moravia regarding thanks
to
> Venus were well-intended and not a hypocritical use of religion for
> insult. While I can peer into no one's heeart but my own, I have
> discussed religious matters with Gn. Equitius and know that he is
not
> what I would characterise as an orthodox Christian and that his his
> religious beliefs have a place for due and sincere honour to the Di
> Immortales (recall that Severus Alexander's bedchamber contined
images
> of all the Gods and that he included a statue of Jesus of Nazareth
> among them). That is a more syncretistic view than I would ever
> accept for myself, but it is the place of no Roman to play
inquisitor
> as to another Roman's beliefs. If a man says he sincerely thanks
> Venus, then I believe him. If he does so hypocritically, Venus will
> deal with the matter far more effectively than I could ever hope to
do
> so. Sworn oaths are a different matter in terms of the words
binding
> the oathgiver to specific beliefs as necessary conditions for the
> oath's fulfillment, but that is not at issue here.
>
> If someone had sneeringly posted "look how good much your Venus did
> for you," that chap and I would be having a stern chat about
attitude
> readjustment, but Gn. Equitius did nothing of the sort. If a faux
pas
> was committed, then I am certain Gn. Equitius will apologise, but I
> certainly do not think any offence was intended.
>
> We must be more accepting of genuine efforts to show respect to each
> others' religious traditions or we shall be imitating in short order
> the Arians and Athanasians under Constantius (no allusion to the
> cognomen of a Flamen intended :-).
>
> Valete.
>
> G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18643 From: deciusiunius Date: 2003-12-27
Subject: Re: Re Congratulations
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@c...> wrote:
> Salvete Quirites, et salve Deci Iuni,

Salve Gn Equiti,

> [snipping much, and thanks for the clarification of Catholic
> vocabulary]

No problem. I'm a recovering Catholic with hundreds of RC books on
hand I inherited from my father last year.

> I'd written:
> >>I ask, in all kindness and sincerity, why your opinion has any
> >>bearing on my spirituality? If I pour out a libation to Thor,
just
> >>using him as an example for the moment, isn't the worth of the
> >>offering between him and me? If he finds my offering sincere,
then
> >>that's enough. If he doesn't, then no amount of posturing on my
> >>part will make him change his mind.
>
> Decimus Iunius replied:

I think you meant Decius, though it is no insult to be confused with
Decimus.

> > Well, because you are an officer in an organization whose main
>goal and raison d'etre is to revive and promote the Religio Romana.
>
> Y'know, I just looked at the Declaration of Nova Roma and the
> Preamble of the Constitution, and neither of them says that.

Y'know, I helped write those documents, helped Cassius and Vedius lay
the foundation of this organization and I can tell you unequivocally
that Nova Roma was founded to revive and promote the religio.
Everything else was an afterthought. Don't tell me why or not this
organization was founded, I helped do it. Boot.

> From the Declaration:
>
> > We, the Senate and People of New Rome, in order to restore
> > the foundations of Western Civilization, declare the founding
> > of Nova Roma as a soverign Nation. We manifest Nova Roma as an
> > independent world nation and republic, with its own legal
> > constitution and lawful government, with all international
> > rights and responsibilities that such status carries.
> [...]
> > Citizenship in Nova Roma is open to people of all nationalities
> > and races. The express purpose of our nation is to promote
> > international understanding and cooperation through the
>>preservation of our common Classical foundation, and to breathe new
>>life and honor into all Western Civilization through the
>>restoration of ancient Piety, Virtue, and Civilitas.
>
>
> http://novaroma.org/tabularium/declaration_novaroma.html
>
> I'm here to restore the foundations of Western Civilization,
> to promote international understanding, and cooperation through
> the preservation of our common Classical foundation. I'm here
> to breathe new life and honor into all Western Civilization via
> Piety, Virtue, and Civilitas.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying those things are not important.
They are important and they enhance Nova Roma. However, all those
things can be done as well or better in another organization,
educational, reenactment, or macronational government--what have you.
What is unique and defining about Nova Roma IS the Religio. Nova
Roma was founded to provide a governmental structure for the Religio
Romana to exist. Since it was a state religion it needed a state
(albeit of sorts) and a governmental structure to exist. Please don't
try to lessen that uniqueness. The Religio can only help in promoting
the goals you state above.

> I respect the Religio Romana as our state religion. I honor the
> Capitoline gods and goddesses. But I do not agree that the main
> goal and raison d'etre of Nova Roma is the revival and promotion
> of the Religio.

Well, it was and is our raison d'etre, though perhaps promotion is a
loaded word with evangelical connotations. That goal may be forgotten
and diluted at times but it is our reason for being. And the fact
that some people no longer see that really that is the fault of us
Nova Romans who have been here the longest; we should be putting the
religio at the center of Nova Roman life, as it was in Roman life.

>That's not what the Declaration says, and it's
> not what the Constitution says. It's not what *I* joined for, nor
> is it what I've served for.

It's not what the Constitution says? Well, To quote the
Constitution: "As a nation, Nova Roma shall be the temporal homeland
and worldly focus for the Religio Romana. The *primary* functions of
Nova Roma shall be to promote the study and practice of pagan Roman
civilization, defined as the period from the founding of the City of
Rome in 753 BCE to the removal of the altar of Victory from the
Senate in 394 CE and encompassing such fields as religion, culture,
politics, art, literature, language, and philosophy."

Notice that religion has place of precedence in this list and
that "As a nation, Nova Roma shall be the temporal homeland and
worldly focus for the Religio Romana." Religion is not one field
among many, it is the core reason for our existence.


> > Magistracies are semi-religious in nature, there is no escaping
>the
> > fact,
>
> Yes, in those cases where the Constitution so specifies.
>
> > You have never posted anything about the religio before or made
> > reference towards any deity that I recall, so your recents spate
>>of posts with religious references have the *appearance* of
>posturing.
>
> Spate? What spate?

Hyperbole. A couple, though it certainly seemed like a spate at the
time.

>Yesterday I replied to Diana's post about her
> religious experience with an "Ave" for her goddess. Since then I've
> written a few things to address the questions some people have had,
> and answered others off-list in order to keep the volume of the
> discussion as limited as possible.
>
> > I say appearance becaue no one can look inside you so we judge
you by
> > your words and deeds. Your posts did not help; you are not RR
>
> How do you know what I am or am not? Do I have to be baptized
> or confirmed in the Religio Romana to be a practitioner? Will
> the Office of the Inquisition come calling on me to insure my
> proper actions?

You are quite right, that was an unfortunate choice of words. I have
no idea what your personal beliefs are. My apologies for taking on
the appearance of an Inquisitor.

> > so it appeared you were being insincere--political posturing.
>
> Of all the political posturing I've seen in the last year, the
> vast majority of it left unaddressed by you, this is an absurd
> statement Palladius.

Pot calling the kettle black. You are selective about which political
posturing to address and selective about who to respond to or who not
to respond to; allow me the same courtesy.

> Enough. I need to go get a prescription for my granddaughter.

I hope all is well with her. (that's not posturing, that is honest
concern)

Vale,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18644 From: forthegodshonor@aol.com Date: 2003-12-27
Subject: Calling All Women!
Salvete to the women of Nova Roma (and the men who wish to learn this subject
too),

I have to pass it up with Cassius, but I would like to create a group -
hopefully formally recognized by Nova Roma - that would teach women about how to be
proper Roman Matronas, and how women in Rome were treated, expected to act,
etc.

Granted women did NOT have the best of lives in Rome. They were strictly
under the direction of the Paterfamilias and Rome's society was extremely male -
dominated. I will warn that this group will stress that - but not in the
sense to keep up that mentallity that woman can't do anything, but in the sense
that this is how it was - what do we want now.

Are there any women (again, or men) who would like to join such a group?
Please e-mail privately (or I guess here on this list) at Forthegodshonor@...
. My AIM is the same, Forthegodshonor . I thank you very much!

I have created a poll for this, please feel free to put your answers there as
well. The poll will last a month. Ending on the 21 of March. The birthday
of Rome.

Take care, be well, much love!
Valete,

~*~**~ Katie/Seta/Anneia/Ari ~**~*~

~ those who are different change the world those
who are the same keep it that way ~

Thank you to "Master Akane" for allowing me to use this quote in my
signature.
I am not aware of who the originating author is. But it's too true to pass
up.
It's how I feel as well. Enjoy it. :)

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ShemsuSet
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ma-A-Kherw
http://www.livejournal.com/users/beloveddaughter
http://www.kemetjournals.com/users/hrhprincessseta
http://www.fanfiction.net/~HRHPrincessAri

Main E-mail:
Forthegodshonor@...
Second E-mail:
BelovedDaughterOfMaatAndSet@...
Third E-mail:
SetaTheThunderbird@...
AIM:
FutureQueenOfAll
Yahoo IM:
SetaTheThunderbird
MSN:
BelovedDaughterOfMaatAndSet


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 18645 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2003-12-27
Subject: Re: Calling All Women!
Salvete omnes,

Well guess that essentially means that women must be excluded from
all political offices, be seen and not heard in the household during
her husband's business and political dinners, have a male escort to
take them to the shopping malls (markets), sandle footed, pregnant
and chained to the stove with just enough slack in the chain to reach
the bedroom.

Would it not be a better idea to have a re-enactment theocratic,
middle eastern type state with the retention of age old tribal
customs that predates the religion you choose?

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, forthegodshonor@a... wrote:
> Salvete to the women of Nova Roma (and the men who wish to learn
this subject
> too),
>
> I have to pass it up with Cassius, but I would like to create a
group -
> hopefully formally recognized by Nova Roma - that would teach women
about how to be
> proper Roman Matronas, and how women in Rome were treated, expected
to act,
> etc.
>
> Granted women did NOT have the best of lives in Rome. They were
strictly
> under the direction of the Paterfamilias and Rome's society was
extremely male -
> dominated. I will warn that this group will stress that - but not
in the
> sense to keep up that mentallity that woman can't do anything, but
in the sense
> that this is how it was - what do we want now.
>
> Are there any women (again, or men) who would like to join such a
group?
> Please e-mail privately (or I guess here on this list) at
Forthegodshonor@a...
> . My AIM is the same, Forthegodshonor . I thank you very much!
>
> I have created a poll for this, please feel free to put your
answers there as
> well. The poll will last a month. Ending on the 21 of March. The
birthday
> of Rome.
>
> Take care, be well, much love!
> Valete,
>
> ~*~**~ Katie/Seta/Anneia/Ari ~**~*~
>
> ~ those who are different change the world those
> who are the same keep it that way ~
>
> Thank you to "Master Akane" for allowing me to use this quote in my
> signature.
> I am not aware of who the originating author is. But it's too true
to pass
> up.
> It's how I feel as well. Enjoy it. :)
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ShemsuSet
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ma-A-Kherw
> http://www.livejournal.com/users/beloveddaughter
> http://www.kemetjournals.com/users/hrhprincessseta
> http://www.fanfiction.net/~HRHPrincessAri
>
> Main E-mail:
> Forthegodshonor@a...
> Second E-mail:
> BelovedDaughterOfMaatAndSet@h...
> Third E-mail:
> SetaTheThunderbird@y...
> AIM:
> FutureQueenOfAll
> Yahoo IM:
> SetaTheThunderbird
> MSN:
> BelovedDaughterOfMaatAndSet
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]