Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Jan 1-4, 2004

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19028 From: Stefn_Ullarsson Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: A new (host community) Year begun
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19029 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: Update
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19030 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath Of Office Tribune of the Plebs Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19031 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Consular Sacrifice Ceremony
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19032 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Consular Oath Of Office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19033 From: Neil Lucock Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: Movies: QVO VADIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19034 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Censorial Oath Of Office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19035 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: Consular Sacrifice Ceremony
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19036 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Consular Oath of Office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19037 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: The Deification Of Emperors (Academic questions)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19038 From: Caius Minius Draco Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: The Deification Of Emperors (Academic questions)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19039 From: Caius Minius Draco Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Roman Music
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19040 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: 2757 begins!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19041 From: forthegodshonor@aol.com Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Happy New Year - 2004
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19042 From: Julilla Sempronia Magna Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath of Office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19043 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath of Office - Gaius Modius Athanasius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19044 From: Gnaeus Octavius Noricus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath of Office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19045 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath of Office, Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19046 From: Gaia Fabia Livia Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath of Office - Quaestor (Gaia Fabia Livia)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19047 From: Livia Cornelia Hibernia Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath of Office as Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19048 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Congratulations to Urbs Roma!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19049 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Thank You Accensi Magni!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19050 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Thank You Amica!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19051 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath as Rogator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19052 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: 2757 begins!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19053 From: Brandon Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: For Roman Literature Lovers
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19054 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: 2757 begins!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19055 From: Fr. Apulus Caesar Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath of Office as Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19056 From: Fr. Apulus Caesar Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath of Office as Senator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19057 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath of Office as Aedilis Curulis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19058 From: L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: 2757 begins!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19059 From: Scriboni89@aol.com Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: For Roman Literature Lovers
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19060 From: Fr. Apulus Caesar Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: 2757 begins!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19061 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Edictum Aedilicium Perpetuum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19062 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: 2757 begins!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19063 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Kalendae Ianuarii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19064 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: More Links
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19065 From: rexmarciusnr Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: the end of duties is coming up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19066 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Corrrection to Edictum Aedilicium Perpetuum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19067 From: Marcus Bianchius Antonius Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Quaestor - Oath of Office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19068 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: File - List Guidelines, Main List
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19069 From: Stefn_Ullarsson Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Imperium is Affirmed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19070 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: The passing of imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19071 From: Caius Curius Saturninus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: my oath of office for quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19072 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: File - List Guidelines, Main List
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19073 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Kalendae Ianuarii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19074 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Acknowledgment of the Passing of Imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19075 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Kalendae Ianuarii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19076 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: 2757 begins!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19077 From: O. Flavius Pompeius Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Kalendae Ianuarii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19078 From: Gnaeus Octavius Noricus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Edictum Praetoricium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19079 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Call for Candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19080 From: Gnaeus Octavius Noricus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Kalendae Ianuarii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19081 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Kalendae Ianuarii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19082 From: Patricia Cassia Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Investment of Imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19083 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Oath of Office as Curator Araneum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19084 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Further Incorporations to the Senate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19085 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Further Incorporations to the Senate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19086 From: m_iulius@virgilio.it Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Rif: Re: [Nova-Roma] Adult SummerCamp & European Rally question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19087 From: m_iulius@virgilio.it Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Rif: [NR_Italia] EDICTUM PROPRAETORICIUM XV DE URBE ROMAE RATA HABE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19088 From: m_iulius@virgilio.it Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Oath of Office as Aedilis Curulis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19089 From: labienus@novaroma.org Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Investment of Imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19090 From: C. Iulius Iustinus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Question about the gens
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19091 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Question about the gens
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19092 From: labienus@novaroma.org Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Question about the gens
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19093 From: Decimus Iunius Silanus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Edictum Censoricium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19094 From: Decimus Iunius Silanus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Investment of Imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19095 From: Decimus Iunius Silanus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Thank you's (again)!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19096 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Renewal of Consular Edicta
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19097 From: Thomas Gangale Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: [ComitiaCuriata] Imperium is Affirmed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19098 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Fwd: Confirming Imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19099 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: FW Confirming Imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19100 From: Clint Johnson Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Oath of Office as Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19101 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Call for Candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19102 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Return
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19103 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19104 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19105 From: Julilla Sempronia Magna Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19106 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19107 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19108 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19109 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19110 From: Fr. Apulus Caesar Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Supporting Lucius Iulius Sulla
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19111 From: Fr. Apulus Caesar Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: the port of Neapolis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19112 From: nateguiboche Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19113 From: nateguiboche Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19114 From: nateguiboche Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19115 From: nateguiboche Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19116 From: nateguiboche Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19117 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19118 From: Lucius Pompeius Octavianus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Latinoamericanos : recordatorio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19119 From: Lucius Pompeius Octavianus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19120 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Le Thovey: a Roman mansio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19121 From: nateguiboche Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19122 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: For Roman Literature Lovers
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19123 From: C. Iulius Iustinus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Descent from the Gods
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19124 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Roman Revival
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19125 From: Livia Cornelia Hibernia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Return
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19126 From: Livia Cornelia Hibernia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Return
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19127 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19128 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor a rebutal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19129 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Supporting Lucius Iulius Sulla Part I
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19130 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19131 From: TiAnO Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Witnessing the passing of Imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19132 From: Franciscus Apulus Caesar Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Supporting Lucius Iulius Sulla Part I
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19133 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19134 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: The Will of Venus and a Pontiff
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19135 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19136 From: Fr. Apulus Caesar Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19137 From: Fr. Apulus Caesar Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Digest Number 1049
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19138 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: The Will of Venus and a Pontiff
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19139 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: The Will of Venus and a Pontiff
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19140 From: nateguiboche Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Return
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19141 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19142 From: Gaia Fabia Livia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19143 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor a rebutal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19144 From: Stefn_Ullarsson Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Standing for Rogator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19145 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19146 From: Gaia Fabia Livia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19147 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: The Will of Venus and a Pontiff
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19148 From: Lucius Pompeius Octavianus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: email problem
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19149 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19150 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Standing for Rogator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19151 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19152 From: Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: oath of office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19153 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Our new candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19154 From: L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Request to the Praetors
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19155 From: Gnaeus Octavius Noricus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Request to the Praetors
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19156 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: The Will of Venus and a Pontiff
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19157 From: Stefn_Ullarsson Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Standing for Rogator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19158 From: jmath669642reng@webtv.net Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Investment Of Imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19159 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: The Will of Venus and a Pontiff
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19160 From: rory12001 Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: The Will of Venus and a Pontiff
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19161 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: The Will of Venus and a Pontiff Part I
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19162 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19163 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Standing for Rogator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19164 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: The Tribunate and the cursus (WAS: Declaration of candidacy for Qua
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19165 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor a rebutal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19166 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19167 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor Part II
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19168 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Electoral systems (WAS: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19169 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19170 From: Brandon Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Concerning the censorship of A. Claudius (for the scholars)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19171 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19172 From: Brandon Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Concerning the censorship of A. Claudius (for the scholars)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19173 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: The Tribunate and the cursus (WAS: Declaration of candidacy f...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19174 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Concerning the censorship of A. Claudius (for the scholars)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19175 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quaestor II
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19176 From: Brandon Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Concerning the censorship of A. Claudius (for the scholars)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19177 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quaestor II
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19178 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quaestor II
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19179 From: rory12001 Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19180 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Nova-Roma] Endorsement for Stephanus Ullerius Ventor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19181 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19182 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: The Will of Venus and a Pontiff Part I
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19183 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Electoral systems (WAS: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19184 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: R: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor Part II
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19185 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19186 From: Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quaestor II
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19187 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19188 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Request to the Praetors
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19189 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19190 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: ad diem III Nonae Ianuarii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19191 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19192 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: The Excavations at Sepphoris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19193 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19194 From: Adrian Gunn Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19195 From: Stefn_Ullarsson Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Endorsement for Stephanus Ullerius Ventor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19196 From: Gaia Fabia Livia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19197 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Did the Romans wage a war or genocide against the Scots?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19198 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Electoral systems (WAS: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19199 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: As promised, on the Moravian system
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19200 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Did the Romans wage a war or genocide against the Scots?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19201 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-01-04
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19202 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-04
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19203 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-04
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19028 From: Stefn_Ullarsson Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: A new (host community) Year begun
Salus ex fortuna omnes,

My thanks to the magistrates of the year just past.

My blessing upon the magistrates for the upcoming year.

May That Which Is Holy Smile Upon Nova Roma.

In amicus sub fidelis - Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19029 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: Update
Salve Marinus

Give Paulina my best and I hope she has a quick recovery. My best to both of you for the New Year.

Vale

Tiberius

----- Original Message -----
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 11:57 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Update


Salvete Quirites,

I hope you are all enjoying your preparations for the
New Year.

I've been occupied for most of the past two days with
hospitals, doctors, and waiting. My wife, Paulina
Gratidia, has a bad case of influenza that has developed
into pneumonia. She's currently in the hospital, and
they may keep her for another few days until she is in
fit shape to go home.

As you might guess, this has prevented me from having
much computer access. You folks can generate a LOT of
e-mail in a few days. I had some 240+ Nova Roma related
messages to wade through this morning, and I was feeling
lucky that I get some of my groups in digest format,
or the number would have been over 300.

AT this point, I've read through it all (and deleted
most of it). Will reply to a few items as time permits.

Valete,

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus




Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19030 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath Of Office Tribune of the Plebs Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Salve Nova Romans

On this, the the first day of IANVARIVS MMDCCLVII A.U.C.


I, Timothy Paul Gallagher, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus do hereby solemnly swear
to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests
of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus swear to
honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to
pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State
Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten
its status as the State Religion.

I, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus swear to protect and defend the Constitution of
Nova Roma.

I, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus further swear to fulfill the obligations
and responsibilities of the office of Tribune of the Plebs to the best of my
abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods
and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I
accept the position of Tribune of the Plebs and all the rights, privileges,
obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.


Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Tribune 2757 A.U.C.
Fortuna Favet Fortibus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19031 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Consular Sacrifice Ceremony
Cn. Salix Astur Quiritibus S.P.D.

A few days ago, I humbly asked the Pontifex and Flamen Quirinalis C.
Iulius Scaurus to help me with the preparation of a simple ceremony
that could serve as a reflection of the traditional ceremony
performed by a newly elected consul in the dawn of the new year. I
did so with the desire to please the Gods so that they may bless Nova
Roma in the year that has just began.

This is the historical introduction prepared by C. Iulius Scaurus:

"In Roma antiqua on the pridie Kalendae Ianuarii, the Pontifex
Maximus would have convened the Comitia Curiata to vote imperium to
the incoming curule magistrates, effective as of the Kalends of
Ianuarius, setting the legal grounds for the inauguration of the new
consuls. Before daybreak on the Kalends of Ianuarius the senior
consul-elect rose and prepared to survey the skies for auspicia
oblativa as the pullarius conducted the tripudium which would
determine the auspices of new consulship shortly after dawn. If a
favourable tripudium resulted, the consul-elect would return home,
attire himself in the consular toga praetexta and receive clients,
well-wishers, and senators in his atrium until the hour for the
procession to the Capitoline hill arrived."

"Accompanied by an accensus and priests, followed by twelve lictores
with unaxed fasces, and the multitude who had joined him at his home,
the senior consul-elect led the procession, gathering masses of
onlookers into the parade, to the temple of Iuppiter Optimus Maximus
on the Capitoline. The sella curulis was carried before the
consul-elect as a symbol of his assumption of imperium. At the
temple the consul-elect sacrificed two white heifers from the
Faliscan plain who had never known the yoke to the Capitoline triad
-- Iuppiter, Iuno, and Minerva -- and to Salus pro salute rei
publicae et senatus, for the well-being of the republic and senate.
These heifers had been vowed to these Gods the previous year on the
Kalends of Ianuarius by the incoming consuls and at the conclusion of
the sacrifice, the consul-elect pronounced the votum -- the oath that
two such heifers would be sacrificed on the following Kalends of
Ianuarius. With this vow the lictores presented themselves before
the consul, who had by the vow become consul in fact, and led him to
the Curia for his first meeting of the Senate as consul.
Well-wishers would shower him with coins for good luck."

Unfortunately, it is (at least currently) impossible for us to follow
the original rite with precision, so C. Iulius Scaurus prepared an
alternative caerimoni composed from similar rituals. I followed his
instructions this very same morning, right before the dawn in Madrid
(around 07:30). This is what I did:

I bathed in preparation, then, garbed in toga praetexta, cinctu
Gabino, capite velato, I began the praefatio.

Praefatio

"Iane pater, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces precor, uti sies
volens propitius mihi et Senatui Populoque Novae Romae [Father Ianus,
by offering this incense to you I pray good prayers, so that you may
be propitious to me and the Senate and People of Nova Roma." I
placed incense in the focus of the altar.

"Mars pater, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces precor, uti sies
volens propitius mihi et Senatui Populoque Novae Romae [Father Mars,
by offering this incense to you I pray good prayers, so that you may
be propitious to me and the Senate and People of Nova Roma.]" I
placed incense in the focus of the altar.

"Quirine pater, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces precor, uti sies
volens propitius mihi et Senatui Populoque Novae Romae [Father
Quirinus, by offering this incense to you I pray good prayers, so
that you may be propitious to me and the Senate and People of Nova
Roma.]" I placed incense in the focus of the altar.

"Iane pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Father Ianus, as by
offering to you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for
the sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a
libation from the patera on the focus of the altar.

"Mars pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Father Mars, as by offering
to you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the sake of
this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation from the
patera on the focus of the altar.

"Quirine pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Father Quirinus, as by
offering to you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for
the sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a
libation from the patera on the focus of the altar.

I washed my hands in preparation for the praecatio.

Precatio

"Iuppiter Optime Maxime, rex Deorum, qui res publicas Novas Romanas
nunc custodit defenditque perinde ac res publicas patrum nostrorum
Romanorum custodivit defenditque, tibi fieri oportet in hoc tempore
initii culignam vini dapi, eius rei ergo hac illace dape pullucenda
esto [Iuppiter Best and Greatest, king of the Gods, who protects and
defends the public affairs of Nova Roma just as he protected and
defended the public affairs of our Roman fathers, to you it is proper
for a cup of wine to be given in this time of beginning, for the sake
of this thing may you be honoured by this feast offering]." I poured
a libation from the patera on the focus of the altar.

"Iuno, regina Deorum, qui materne nunc Senatum Populumque Novae Romae
nutrit perinde ac Senatum Populumque Romanum in tempore patrum
nostrorum nutrivit, tibi fieri oportet in hoc tempore initii culignam
vini dapi, eius rei ergo hac illace dape pullucenda esto [Iuno, queen
of the Gods, who maternally nurtures the Senate and People of Nova
Roma just as she nurtured the Senate and People of Rome in the time
of our fathers, to you it is proper for a cup of wine to be given in
this time of beginning, for the sake of this thing may you be
honoured by this feast offering]." I poured a libation from the
patera on the focus of the altar.

"Minerva, sapientia aeterna, qui recte res publicas Novas Romanas
ducit perinde ac res publicas patrum nostrorum Romanorum duxit, tibi
fieri oportet in hoc tempore initii culignam vini dapi, eius rei ergo
hac illace dape pullucenda esto [Minerva, eternal wisdom, who rightly
guides the public affairs of Nova Roma just as she rightly guided the
public affairs of our Roman fathers, to you it is proper for a cup of
wine to be given in this time of beginning, for the sake of this
thing may you be honoured by this feast offering]." I poured a
libation from the patera on the focus of the altar.

Salus, benefactrix Senatus Populique Romani et fideiussorix salutis
nostrae, qui Novam Romam conservat perinde ac Romam antiquam
conservavit, tibi fieri oportet in hoc tempore initii culignam vini
dapi, eius rei ergo hac illace dape pullucenda esto [Salus,
benefactor of the Roman Senate and People and guarantor of our
well-being, who preserves Nova Roma just as she preserved ancient
Rome, to you it is proper for a cup of wine to be given in this time
of beginning, for the sake of this thing may you be honoured by this
feast offering]."

Again I washed my hands in preparation for the redditio.

Redditio

"Iuppiter Optime Maxime, rex Deorum, macte istace dape pollucenda
esto, macte vino inferio esto [Iuppiter Best and Greatest, king of
the Gods, may you be honoured by this feast offering, may you be
honoured by the humble wine.]" I offered Iuppiter Optimus Maximus
cakes, a leaf of laurel, and wine on the focus of the altar.

"Iuno, regina Deorum, macte istace dape pollucenda esto, macte vino
inferio esto [Iuno, queen of the Gods, may you be honoured by this
feast offering, may you be honoured by the humble wine.]" I offered
Iuno cakes, a leaf of laurel, and wine on the focus of the altar.

"Minerva, sapientia aeterna, macte istace dape pollucenda esto, macte
vino inferio esto [Minerva, eternal wisdom, may you be honoured by
this feast offering, may you be honoured by the humble wine.]" I
offered Minerva cakes, a leaf of laurel, and wine on the focus of the
altar.

"Salus, benefactrix Novae Romae, macte istace dape pollucenda esto,
macte vino inferio esto [Salus, benefactrix of Nova Roma, may you be
honoured by this feast offering, may you be honoured by the humble
wine.]" I offered Salus cakes, a leaf of laurel, and wine on the
focus of the altar.

"Quirine pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Father Quirinus, as by
offering to you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for
the sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a
libation from the patera on the focus of the altar.

"Mars pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Father Mars, as by offering
to you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the sake of
this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation from the
patera on the focus of the altar.

"Iane pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Father Ianus, as by
offering to you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for
the sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a
libation from the patera on the focus of the altar.

"Dea Vesta, custos ignis sacri, macte vino inferio esto [Goddess
Vesta, guardian of the sacred fire, be honoured by this humble
wine.]" I poured a libation from the patera on the focus of the
altar.

"Illicet. [It is over.]"

I profaned wine and cakes, and I partook of the epulum with Iuppiter
Optimus Maximus, Iuno, Minerva, and Salus, praying as I ate and
offering libations in my private devotions.

Piaculum

Since the caerimonia of the consular sacrifice has yet to be
recovered from literary or archaeological sources and we are unable
to sacrifice two white heifers of the appropriate type, I concluded
with a piaculum to Iuppiter Optimus Maximus, Iuno, Miverva, and Salus.

"Iuppiter Optime Maxmime, Iuno, Minerva et Salus, Di Immortales, si
quidquam tibi in hac caerimonia displicet, hoc vino inferio veniam
peto et vitium meum expio [Iuppiter Optimus Maximus, Iuno, Minerva,
and Salus, Immortal Gods, if anything in this ceremony is displeasing
to you, with this humble wine I ask forgiveness and expiate my
fault.]" I poured a libation on the focus of the altar.

Votum

Ego, Cn. Salix Astur, Consul Novae Romae, sacrificium Dis
Immortalibus, Iovi, Iunoni, Minervae et Saluti pro salute rei
publicae et senatus in Kalendis posteris Ianuarii voveo [I, Cn. Salix
Astur, Consul of Nova Roma, vow a sacrifice to the Immortal Gods
Iuppiter, Iuno, Minerva, and Salus on the next Kalends of January]."

I hope that the Dii Immortales will bless Nova Roma and all her
citizens in this Annus Novus. Happy New Year to all.

S.V.B.E.E.V.
CN.SALIX.T.F.A.NEP.OVF.ASTVR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19032 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Consular Oath Of Office
Cn. Salix Astur Quiritibus S.P.D.

Ego, GNAEVS SALIX ASTVR (Rodrigo Álvarez), hoc ipso facto sollemniter
IVRO Novae Romae decus defendere et semper pro Novae Romae Populo
atque Senatu agere.

Ut Novae Romae magistratus ego, Gnaeus Salix Astur (Rodrigo Álvarez),
Romae deos deasque colere IVRO in omnibus publicae vitae temporibus
atque Romanas virtutes et ublica et privata vita persequi.

Ego, Gnaeus Salix Astur (Rodrigo Álvarez), Romanam religionem favere
et defendere IVRO ut Novae Romae Reipublicae religionem et numquam
agere ita ut eius status publicae religionis aliquid detrimenti
capiat.

Praeterea ego, Gnaeus Salix Astur (Rodrigo Álvarez) IVRO quam
optime fungi officium muneris CONSULIS.

Meo Novae Romae civis honore et coram Populi Romani deis atque deabus
et eorum voluntate et favore, munus Consulis ACCIPIO una cum iuribus
privilegiis, munera atque officia quae meum munus comportat.

In Hispania Provincia, Kalendas Ianuarii anno MMDCCLVII ad Urbe
condita.

---------------------------------------------------

I, Gnaeus Salix Astur (Rodrigo Álvarez), do hereby solemnly swear
to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best
interests of the People and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Gnaeus Salix Astur (Rodrigo
Álvarez), swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public
dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private
life.

I, Gnaeus Salix Astur (Rodrigo Álvarez), swear to uphold and defend
the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never
to act in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Gnaeus Salix Astur (Rodrigo Álvarez), swear to protect and defend
the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Gnaeus Salix Astur (Rodrigo Álvarez), further swear to fulfill the
obligations and responsibilities of the office of Consul to the best
of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods
and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I
accept the position of Consul and all the rights, privileges,
obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.

In the Province of Hispania, on the Kalends of Ianuarius of the year
2757 since the founding of the City.

S.V.B.E.E.V.
CN.SALIX.T.F.A.NEP.OVF.ASTVR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19033 From: Neil Lucock Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: Movies: QVO VADIS
On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 22:15, pompeia_cornelia wrote:
> ---
>
>
>
> Salve Frater:
>
> "The crazy world of Arthur Brown"?
>
> I have that album somewhere...
>
> gosh I haven't heard that mentioned in years. It's tucked away with
> my Black Sabbath, Cream, Jethro Tull, Deep Purple and CCR's (Now I'm
> dating myself:))
>
Salvete,
anyone (in England) remember Arthur Brown on TOTP? He had a helmet with
burning horns on it. About halfway through the song it got too hot and
he had to take it off and have it put out.Obviously something he'd done
before, I don't think.
<KERANNG>Why are 'Sabbath, Cream, 'Tull and 'Purple "tucked away"? I
still listen to their stuff all the time! (Well, not too much Tull as
they do get a bit quiet at times.) </END KERANNG>
Valete
Gaius Cornelius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19034 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Censorial Oath Of Office
Salvete Quirites!

Today I stand in front of the Gods of Rome and all citizens of Rome
to swear the oath of the office as Censor for two years to come. I
will certainly do my best in my capacity as Censor and I will always
listen to the Gods, the People and the Senate. I will also do my
outmost to cooperate with my colleague to be able to fulfill my
duties as Censor.


I, Caeso Fabius Quintilianus (Christer Edling) do hereby solemnly
swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best
interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Caeso Fabius Quintilianus (Christer
Edling) swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public
dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private
life.

I, Caeso Fabius Quintilianus (Christer Edling) swear to uphold and
defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and
swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as the
State Religion.

I, Caeso Fabius Quintilianus (Christer Edling) swear to protect and
defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Caeso Fabius Quintilianus (Christer Edling) further swear to
fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of Censor
to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the
Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor,
do I accept the position of Censor and all the rights, privileges,
obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19035 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: Consular Sacrifice Ceremony
Salvete Quirites,

Gnaeus Salix Astur wrote:

[...]
> Unfortunately, it is (at least currently) impossible for us to follow
> the original rite with precision, so C. Iulius Scaurus prepared an
> alternative caerimoni composed from similar rituals. I followed his
> instructions this very same morning, right before the dawn in Madrid
> (around 07:30).

[text of ceremony snipped, but cherished]

> Ego, Cn. Salix Astur, Consul Novae Romae, sacrificium Dis
> Immortalibus, Iovi, Iunoni, Minervae et Saluti pro salute rei
> publicae et senatus in Kalendis posteris Ianuarii voveo [I, Cn. Salix
> Astur, Consul of Nova Roma, vow a sacrifice to the Immortal Gods
> Iuppiter, Iuno, Minerva, and Salus on the next Kalends of January]."

As the Senior Consul, it is Astur's right and privilege to have
conducted this ceremony. I'm very, very pleased that he has done
so. As his colleague, I join in his promise to insure that next
year's Senior Consul or a designated representative will conduct
such a sacrifice to Iuppiter, Iuno, Minerva, and Salus on the next
Kalends of Ianuarius.

> I hope that the Dii Immortales will bless Nova Roma and all her
> citizens in this Annus Novus. Happy New Year to all.

So may it be. Thank you Astur.

Now I shall take my own Consular oath.

Valete Quirites!

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19036 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Consular Oath of Office
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Civibus et Senatus Novae Romae Salutem Plurimam Dixit:


I, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus (William C. Gawne), do hereby solemnly
swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the
best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus, swear
to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings,
and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus, swear to uphold and defend the Religio
Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in
a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus, swear to protect and defend the
Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus, further swear to fulfill the obligations
and responsibilities of the office of Consul to the best of my
abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods
and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I
accept the position of Consul and all the rights, privileges, obligations,
and responsibilities attendant thereto.


Ego, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus (William C. Gawne) hoc ipso facto
sollemniter IVRO Novae Romae decus defendere et semper
pro Novae Romae Populo atque Senatu agere.

Ut Novae Romae magistratus ego Gnaeus Equitius Marinus,
Romae deos deasque colere IVRO in omnibus publicae vitae
temporibus atque Romanas virtutes et publica et privata vita
persequi.

Ego Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Romanam religionem favere et defendere
IVRO ut Novae Romae Reipublicae religionem et numquam agere ita ut
eius status publicae religionis aliquid detrimenti capiat.

Praeterea ego Gnaeus Equitius Marinus IVRO quam optime fungi officium
muneris Consuli.

Meo Novae Romae civis honore et coram Populi Romani deis atque deabus
et eorum voluntate et favore, munus Consuli ACCIPIO una cum
iuribus, privilegiis. munera atque officia quae meum munus comportat.

In America Mediatlantica Provincia, Kal. Jaunarius, anno MMDCCLVII
A.V.C.

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19037 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: The Deification Of Emperors (Academic questions)
Salve Druse,

Good man! Thanks for the answer on that question.

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Sicinius Drusus" <drusus@b...>
wrote:
> Salvete,
>
> Actually Blasphemy is a Jewish and Christian concept, not a Roman
> concept. The Only laws that the Romans had that were remotly
similar
> were on Sacrilege (Sacrilegum) which covered theft from a Temple,
and on
> Impiety of a magistrate ie the case of Claudius tossing the sacred
> chickens overboard when they didn't return the Auspices he desired.
In
> Imperial times the word Sacrilegum begain to be applied in common
usage
> in a manner approaching the Christian concept, but the popular use
of
> the word never was made a part of Roman law until after the
Christians
> took over.
>
> The attempts of people like Commodus and Caligula to compare
themselves
> to the Gods was Hubris, and the Immortals showed neither of them
favor
> because of it. Both were murdered at a young age.
>
> Brandon wrote:
>
> > I am also curious on this point but also wish to include Commodus
> > Antoninus in this question. As I recall he also saw himself as
one
> > of the gods in particular Hercules. The Capitoline Museum, if I
> > remember correctly, has the statue of him clad in a lions' skin,
> > bearing the apples representing eternal life, and holding
Hercules'
> > club. The way the story goes the two seperate figures on each
side
> > held up a cloth over him making him the center of the universe. To
> > me if anything would be considered blasphemy against the Roman
gods
> > surely this would have been. I am still anxious to hear the reply
> > to these questions. Valete Brandon
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus
(Michael
> > Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
> > > Salvete omnes,
> > >
> > > I have a question here for some of our Religio Romano experts.
> > After
> > > the Republic, there was a succession of emperors some of which
> > > eventually became Gods in status either living or dead. I have
> > never
> > > been clear about this because my information comes partly from
> > > fiction in books, movies and what I learned from a Judeo -
> > Christian
> > > background. Here are my questions:
> > >
> > > 1) Did deification of heros or Roman leaders occur before
Imperial
> > > Rome for any character of that time?
>
> Yes but it was far rarer than in Greece. Romulus is the most noted
example.
>
> >
> > >
> > > 2) Did Caligula who wanted to be regarded as a living god with
> > > statues erected to him technically blaspheme the gods?
>
> No. It is a Christian Concept. His Hubris was offensive to the Gods
and
> he paid for it with his life.
>
> >
> > >
> > > 3) Do or did priests of the Religio Romano actually have powers
on
> > > earth yet a connection to the gods to deify an emperor or a
great
> > > living or dead human, and is that process similar to the way the
> > > Vatican, for example makes a person a saint. Do you see any
> > > connections?
>
> No. Defication consisted of the Senate voting that the new cult
would be
> added to the offical cults of the state.
>
> > >
> > > 4) Was an emperor really considered a living god similar to the
> > > Pharoes of Egypt or kings of the Mayans or Aztecs or was this
more
> > > symbolic, tying the gods to the state of Rome?
> > >
>
> No. Each man had a Genius (Women had a Juno) which was the devine
> spirit in humans. The Emperor's Genius, NOT the person himself was
> worshiped in the Imperial cult. This is similar to the worship of
the
> Genius of the Paterfamilias in the domestic cult.
>
> L. Sicinius Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19038 From: Caius Minius Draco Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: The Deification Of Emperors (Academic questions)
Salve omnes !
Thank you very much for the link :)
Do I have to build a Lararium ? or can it be done with something else ?
thanks for help.
CAIVS MINIVS DRACO
CVRATOR ARANEVM MINIVM
CIVIS THVLAE PROVINCIAE
CIVIS PLEBIAE NOVAE ROMAE OPTIMA MAXIMA

Brandon wrote:

> I am also curious on this point but also wish to include Commodus
> Antoninus in this question. As I recall he also saw himself as one
> of the gods in particular Hercules. The Capitoline Museum, if I
> remember correctly, has the statue of him clad in a lions' skin,
> bearing the apples representing eternal life, and holding Hercules'
> club. The way the story goes the two seperate figures on each side
> held up a cloth over him making him the center of the universe. To
> me if anything would be considered blasphemy against the Roman gods
> surely this would have been. I am still anxious to hear the reply
> to these questions. Valete Brandon
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
> Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > I have a question here for some of our Religio Romano experts.
> After
> > the Republic, there was a succession of emperors some of which
> > eventually became Gods in status either living or dead. I have
> never
> > been clear about this because my information comes partly from
> > fiction in books, movies and what I learned from a Judeo -
> Christian
> > background. Here are my questions:
> >
> > 1) Did deification of heros or Roman leaders occur before Imperial
> > Rome for any character of that time?
> >
> > 2) Did Caligula who wanted to be regarded as a living god with
> > statues erected to him technically blaspheme the gods?
> >
> > 3) Do or did priests of the Religio Romano actually have powers on
> > earth yet a connection to the gods to deify an emperor or a great
> > living or dead human, and is that process similar to the way the
> > Vatican, for example makes a person a saint. Do you see any
> > connections?
> >
> > 4) Was an emperor really considered a living god similar to the
> > Pharoes of Egypt or kings of the Mayans or Aztecs or was this more
> > symbolic, tying the gods to the state of Rome?
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance for your points of view.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19039 From: Caius Minius Draco Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Roman Music
Salve omnes
Do you know where I can find real roman music or at least modern songs
in Latin. No christian
things of course.
thx for help.
VALE IN PACE DEORUM

CAIVS MINIVS DRACO
CVRATOR ARANEVM MINIVM
CIVIS THVLAE PROVINCIAE
CIVIS PLEBIAE NOVAE ROMAE OPTIMA MAXIMA


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19040 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: 2757 begins!
Salvete citizens,

The New Year has begun in Germania Inferior with a blanket of rarely seen white snow covering the
flatlands, which seems to have the effect of washing away the dust and dirt of last year and
making everything pure and clean once again. To me at least, this is a good omen.

In the spirit of a new beginning that a new year always brings I wold like to offer this olive
branch to a few citizens whom I disagreed with last year, sometimes specifically in my capacity as
a Tribune:

Franciscus Apulus, Cordus, Scaevola, Pompeia Cornelia, Tullia, Titus Octavius, Gn. Marinus and in
particular our new Censor C Fabius whom I sometimes disagreed with politically while always
maintaining that I find him to be a true gentleman.

It's a new year ladies & gentlemen and for my part I am starting over and will not let any baggage
from the last year reflect in the way I interact with you during this coming year.

Valete,

Diana Moravia

________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19041 From: forthegodshonor@aol.com Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Happy New Year - 2004
Salvete,

I wish that 2004 be a grand and wonderful year for Nova Roma and everyone
within it's "boundaries'. Please be well, take care, and have much love in your
life from now on and always! May the Gods be with us.

Valete,

~*~**~ Katie/Seta/Anneia/Ari ~**~*~

~ those who are different change the world those
who are the same keep it that way ~

Thank you to "Master Akane" for allowing me to use this quote in my
signature.
I am not aware of who the originating author is. But it's too true to pass
up.
It's how I feel as well. Enjoy it. :)

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ShemsuSet
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ma-A-Kherw
http://www.livejournal.com/users/beloveddaughter
http://www.kemetjournals.com/users/hrhprincessseta
http://www.fanfiction.net/~HRHPrincessAri

Main E-mail:
Forthegodshonor@...
Second E-mail:
BelovedDaughterOfMaatAndSet@...
Third E-mail:
SetaTheThunderbird@...
AIM:
FutureQueenOfAll
Yahoo IM:
SetaTheThunderbird
MSN:
BelovedDaughterOfMaatAndSet


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19042 From: Julilla Sempronia Magna Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath of Office
Julilla Sempronia Magna Quiritibus S.P.D

Ego, Julilla Sempronia Magna (Sara La Follette Urdahl) hoc ipso facto
sollemniter IVRO Novae Romae decus defendere et semper pro Novae Romae
Populo atque Senatu agere.

Ut Novae Romae magistrata ego Julilla Sempronia Magna (Sara La Follette
Urdahl) Romae deos deasque colere IVRO in omnibus publicae vitae temporibus
atque Romanas virtutes et publica et privata vita
persequi.

Ego Julilla Sempronia Magna (Sara La Follette Urdahl) Romanam religionem
favere et defendere IVRO ut Novae Romae Reipublicae religionem et numquam
agere ita ut eius status publicae religionis aliquid detrimenti capiat.

Praeterea ego Julilla Sempronia Magna (Sara La Follette Urdahl) IVRO quam
optime fungi officium muneris Tribuni.

Mea Novae Romae civa honore et coram Populi Romani deis atque deabus et
eorum voluntate et favore, munus Tribuni accipio una cum iuribus,
privilegiis munera atque officia quae meum munus comportat.

In America Boreoccidentalis Provincia, Kal. Ian. MMDCCLVII A.V.C.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------


I, Julilla Sempronia Magna (Sara La Follette Urdahl), do hereby solemnly
swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best
interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Julilla Sempronia Magna (Sara La Follette
Urdahl), swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public
dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Julilla Sempronia Magna (Sara La Follette Urdahl), swear to uphold and
defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never
to act in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Julilla Sempronia Magna (Sara La Follette Urdahl), swear to protect and
defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Julilla Sempronia Magna (Sara La Follette Urdahl), further swear to
fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of Tribuna Plebis
to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods and
Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept the
position of Tribuna Plebis and all the rights, privileges, obligations, and
responsibilities attendant thereto.

In America Boreoccidentalis Provincia, Kal. Ian. MMDCCLVII A.V.C.


---
IVLI.SEMPRON.MAGN.T.P.
@____@ Julilla Sempronia Magna
|||| Tribuna Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19043 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath of Office - Gaius Modius Athanasius
I Gaius Modius Athanasius (David O. Kling, Jr.), do hereby solemnly swear to
uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests of the
people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I Gaius Modius Athanasius (David O. Kling,
Jr.), swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to
pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Gaius Modius Athanasius (David O. Kling, Jr.), swear to uphold and defend
the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act
in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Gaius Modius Athanasius (David O. Kling, Jr.), swear to protect and
defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Gaius Modius Athanasius (David O. Kling, Jr.), further swear to fulfill
the obligations and responsibilities of the office of Tribune of the Plebs to
the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods and
Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept the
position of Tribune of the Plebs and all the rights, privileges, obligations, and
responsibilities attendant thereto.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19044 From: Gnaeus Octavius Noricus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath of Office
I, Gnaeus Octavius Noricus (Klemens Edler), do hereby solemnly
swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best
interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Gnaeus Octavius Noricus, swear to honor the
Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman
Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Gnaeus Octavius Noricus, swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as
the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would
threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Gnaeus Octavius Noricus, swear to protect and defend the Constitution of
Nova Roma.

I, Gnaeus Octavius Noricus, further swear to fulfill the obligations and
responsibilities of the office of Praetor to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods and
Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept the
position of Praetor and all the rights, privileges, obligations, and
responsibilities attendant thereto.

Vindobona, Kal Ian MMDCCLVII AUC (Vienna, the 1st of January 2004)

--
Optime valete!

Gnaeus Octavius Noricus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19045 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath of Office, Praetor
Oath of Office, Praetor
Kal Ian MMDCCLVII


I, Marcus Arminius Maior (Marcos Boehme), do
hereby solemnly swear to uphold the honor of Nova
Roma, and to act always in the best interests of the
people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Marcus Arminius
Maior, swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome
in my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues
in my public and private life.

I, Marcus Arminius Maior, swear to uphold and
defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of
Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would
threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Marcus Arminius Maior, swear to protect and
defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Marcus Arminius Maior, further swear to fulfill
the obligations and responsibilities of the office of
Praetor to thebest of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the
presence of the Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people
and by their will and favor, do I accept the position
of Praetor and all the rights, privileges,
obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.


Vale
Marcus Arminius Maior

______________________________________________________________________

Conheça a nova central de informações anti-spam do Yahoo! Mail:
http://www.yahoo.com.br/antispam
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19046 From: Gaia Fabia Livia Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath of Office - Quaestor (Gaia Fabia Livia)
I, Gaia Fabia Livia (Rachel Dugdale), do hereby solemnly swear to uphold
the honour of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests of the
people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Gaia Fabia Livia, swear to honour the
Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman
Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Gaia Fabia Livia, swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the
State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would
threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Gaia Fabia Livia, swear to protect and defend the Constitution of Nova
Roma.

I, Gaia Fabia Livia, further swear to fulfill the obligations and
responsibilities of the office of Quaestor to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods and
Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favour, do I accept
the position of Quaestor and all the rights, privileges, obligations, and
responsibilities attendant thereto.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19047 From: Livia Cornelia Hibernia Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath of Office as Quaestor
Livia Cornelia Hibernia Quiritibus S.P.D.

Ego, Livia Cornelia Hibernia (Linda Gail Walters), hoc ipso facto
sollemniter IVRO Novae Romae decus defendere et semper pro Novae
Romae Populo atque Senatu agere.

Ut Novae Romae magistratus ego, Livia Cornelia Hibernia
(Linda Gail Walters), Romae deos deasque colere IVRO in omnibus
publicae vitae temporibus atque Romanas virtutes et publica et
privata vita persequi.

Ego, Livia Cornelia Hibernia (Linda Gail Walters), Romanam
religionem favere et defendere IVRO ut Novae Romae Reipublicae
religionem et numquam agere ita ut eius status publicae religionis
aliquid detrimenti capiat.

Praeterea ego, Livia Cornelia Hibernia (Linda Gail Walters) IVRO
quam optime fungi officium muneris Quaestoris.

Meo Novae Romae civis honore et coram Populi Romani deis atque
deabus et eorum voluntate et favore, munus Quaestoris accipio una
cum iuribus privilegiis, munera atque officia quae meum munus
comportat.

In Provincia California, KAL. IAN. MMDCCLVII A.V.C.

===================================================

I, Livia Cornelia Hibernia (Linda Gail Walters), do hereby solemnly
swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the
best interests of the People and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Livia Cornelia Hibernia
(Linda Gail Walters), swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome
in my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public
and private life.

I, Livia Cornelia Hibernia (Linda Gail Walters), swear to uphold
and defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma
and swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as
the State Religion.

I, Livia Cornelia Hibernia (Linda Gail Walters), swear to protect
and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Livia Cornelia Hibernia (Linda Gail Walters), further swear to
fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of
Quaestor to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the
Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor,
do I accept the position of Quaestor and all the rights, privileges,
obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.

In the Province of California, on the Kalends of Ianuarius of the
year 2757 since the founding of the City.

Livia Cornelia Hibernia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19048 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Congratulations to Urbs Roma!
Salvete Quirites!

I am very happy to Congratulate Italia Provincia, Propraetor
Illustris Franciscus Apulus Caesar and the citizens of Roma Aeterna
to acknowledement of Urbs Roma!

As the Consul who proposed this legislation and who could see it
executed on the last day of my Consulat, I am extremly happy to be
able to say that Urbs Romana is founded during my Consulship and that
Roma Aeterna was the first city to found a local group accordning to
my lex. Thank You and Congratulations!

Long live the eternal City!!!
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19049 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Thank You Accensi Magni!
Salvete Accensi Magni!

Illustra Patricia Cassia, Illustra Pompeia Cornelia Strabo, Illustris
Gnaeus Salix Astur, Illustris Decius Iunius Palladius and Illustris
Marcus Arminius Maior worked very hard in my Consilium Accensorum
Magnorum (the Council of Major Assistants, called CAM) as my Accensi
Magni (major advisors) during my Consulship.

This was done by all with a seriousness that was very important to
me. Some of the Accensi Magni were my opponents in some fields, still
they did a very good job, as did everybody, in the Consilium. I think
that it is a good idea for a Consul to have such a mixed group, of
very competent citizens consisting of both allies and opponents, to
help the Consul to keep his eyes open to all aspects of the issues
that the Consul will have to meet during his term. To me the idea to
have such a Consilium has proven it worth through the five Accensi
Magni in the CAM.

I found that You all became my friends if You hadn't been such
before! Now I thank You from the bottom of my heart for the splendid
advises You gave me and wish You every Luck in the future!

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19050 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Thank You Amica!
Salve Illustra Patricia Cassia!

I feel that I must Thank You publicly for the huge amount of work You
have done for me as the Vicaria Officinae Aerarii (Deputy Head of the
Financial Office) when my Quaestoir Illustri Sextus Apollonius Scipio
become ill during late spring. You had already done a great job
assisting Sextus Apollonius Scipio in the Officina Aerarii. Now You
after that I had asked You to take over most of the duties as my
Quaestor without having that title. You also did some coordination
job with the other Consular Quaestor Illustris Gnaeus Octavius
Noricus.

You did a great job and saved my day and keept the ship sailing very
proudly. Added to the work in Officina Aerari., You also worked as
the Praeses in the Consilium Accensorum Magnorum (the Council of
Major Assistants). There You were very active and took the position
as Praeses (Chairman).

I thank You from the bottom of my heart for the splendid work You did
and the very good advises You gave me!
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19051 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath as Rogator
A. Apollonius Cordus to all citizens and peregrines,
greetings.

I, A. Apollonius Cordus (J. K. Johnston), do hereby
solemnly swear to uphold the honour of Nova Roma, and
to act always in the best interests of the People and
the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, A. Apollonius Cordus,
swear to honour the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my
public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my
public and private life.

I, A. Apollonius Cordus, swear to uphold and defend
the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma
and swear never to act in a way that would threaten
its status as the State Religion.

I, A. Apollonius Cordus, swear to protect and defend
the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, A. Apollonius Cordus, further swear to fulfill the
obligations and responsibilities of the office of
rogator to the best of my abilities.

On my honour as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the
presence of the Gods and Goddesses of the Roman People
and by their will and favour, do I accept the position
of rogator and all the rights, privileges,
obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.


In London, in the province of Britain, on the first of
January, 2757 AUC.

---

Ego A. Apollonius Cordus (J. K. Johnston) hoc ipso
facto sollemniter IVRO Novae Romae decus defendere et
semper pro Novae Romae Populo atque Senatu agere.

Ut Novae Romae magistratus ego A. Apollonius Cordus
Romae deos deasque colere IVRO in omnibus publicae
vitae temporibus atque Romanas virtutes et publica et
privata vita persequi.

Ego A. Apollonius Cordus Romanam religionem favere et
defendere IVRO ut Novae Romae Reipublicae religionem
et numquam agere ita ut eius status publicae
religionis aliquid detrimenti capiat.

Praeterea ego A. Apollonius Cordus IVRO quam optime
fungi officium muneris rogatoris.

Meo Novae Romae civis honore et coram Populi Romani
deis atque deabus et eorum voluntate et favore, munus
rogatoris ACCIPIO una cum iuribus, privilegiis. munera
atque officia quae meum munus comportat.


In Londinio, in Britannia Provincia, Kal. Ian.
MMDCCLVII AUC.

________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19052 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: 2757 begins!
A. Apollonius Cordus to Priestess Diana Moravia
Aventina and all citizens and peregrines, greetings.

I receive your olive branch with thanks, and return
the offer likewise.

There, a specially short message to show my goodwill! ;)

________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19053 From: Brandon Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: For Roman Literature Lovers
Salve,
For those of you that enjoy great the great classical literature of
ancient Rome you might be interested in ebay. Currently there is a
man with a very large selection of classics published by the Loeb
Classical Library for Seneca, Horace, Cicero, Lucan, Dio Cassius,
Titus Livius, Marcus Aurelius, and Ovidius should anyone be
interested. Just a notice to anyone interested I am in no way
affiliated with the sellers. Valete Brandon
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19054 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: 2757 begins!
Salvete Quirites, et Salve Diana,

Diana Moravia wrote:

> In the spirit of a new beginning that a new year always brings I wold
> like to offer this olive branch to a few citizens whom I disagreed
> with last year [...]

> ... Gn. Marinus

Thank you Diana. No olive branch seems necessary to me, as I've always
felt we were both interested in the same ultimate goals. But I shall
gladly accept it from you since you offer it. We have at times been
opponents, but never enemies.

May all good things come to you this year, and may we all be able to
enjoy the blessings of Concordia.

Valete,

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19055 From: Fr. Apulus Caesar Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath of Office as Tribunus Plebis
I, Franciscus Apulus Caesar [Francesco Valenzano] do hereby solemnly swear
to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interestsof
the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Franciscus Apulus Caesar [Francesco
Valenzano] swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public
dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Franciscus Apulus Caesar [Francesco Valenzano] swear to uphold and defend
the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act
in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Franciscus Apulus Caesar [Francesco Valenzano] swear to protect and
defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Franciscus Apulus Caesar [Francesco Valenzano] further swear to fulfill
the obligations and responsibilities of the office of Tribunus Plebis to the
best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods and
Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept the
position of Tribunus Plebis and all the rights, privileges, obligations, and
responsibilities attendant thereto.


Franciscus Apulus Caesar
------------------------------
NOVA ROMA
------------------------------
Senator
Senior Curule Aedile - http://aediles.novaroma.org/apulus/
Tribunus Plebis 2757
Propraetor Italiae - http://italia.novaroma.org
Scriba et Accensus
Pater Familiae Gens Apula - http://italia.novaroma.org/apula/
Vicarius Academiae Italicae - http://italia.novaroma.org/academiaitalica/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19056 From: Fr. Apulus Caesar Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath of Office as Senator
I, Franciscus Apulus Caesar [Francesco Valenzano] do hereby solemnly swear
to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interestsof
the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Franciscus Apulus Caesar [Francesco
Valenzano] swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public
dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Franciscus Apulus Caesar [Francesco Valenzano] swear to uphold and defend
the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act
in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Franciscus Apulus Caesar [Francesco Valenzano] swear to protect and
defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Franciscus Apulus Caesar [Francesco Valenzano] further swear to fulfill
the obligations and responsibilities of the office of Senator to the best of
my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods and
Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept the
position of Senator and all the rights, privileges, obligations, and
responsibilities attendant thereto.


Franciscus Apulus Caesar
------------------------------
NOVA ROMA
------------------------------
Senator
Senior Curule Aedile - http://aediles.novaroma.org/apulus/
Tribunus Plebis 2757
Propraetor Italiae - http://italia.novaroma.org
Scriba et Accensus
Pater Familiae Gens Apula - http://italia.novaroma.org/apula/
Vicarius Academiae Italicae - http://italia.novaroma.org/academiaitalica/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19057 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Oath of Office as Aedilis Curulis
I, Gregory Rose/Gaius Iulius Scaurus do hereby solemnly swear to
uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests
of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Gregory Rose/Gaius Iulius Scaurus
swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings,
and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Gregory Rose/Gaius Iulius Scaurus swear to uphold and defend the
Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to
act in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Gregory Rose/Gaius Iulius Scaurus swear to protect and defend the
Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Gregory Rose/Gaius Iulius Scaurus further swear to fulfill the
obligations and responsibilities of the office of Aedilis Curulis to
the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods
and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I
accept the position of Aedilis Curulis and all the rights, privileges,
obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.

May the Di Immortales bless, preserve, and protect Nova Roma!

Given in the province of America Austroccidentalis on the Kalendae
Ianuarii in the consulship of Cn. Salix Astur and Gn. Equitius Marinus.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19058 From: L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: 2757 begins!
Salve, Moravia Aventina


Pity I don't get this olive branch offering. I guess that holding no magistracy for this year is a sort of requirement I don't acomplish for such gift. :-)

However, I wish you the best on your run for being a Senatrix, although some people believe that Nova Roma is a sort of "Popular contest". :-)

Best luck for all the new magistrates this year, and the very best to any singular citizen of Nova Roma. As a friend of mine said once, I wish you all that the worst that could happen to you this year will be at least equal to the very best you lived last year. :-)


vale bene in pace deorum,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS


----------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 18:16:18 +0000 (GMT)
From: Diana Moravia <sacerdosveneris@...>
Subject: 2757 begins!

Salvete citizens,

The New Year has begun in Germania Inferior with a blanket of rarely seen white snow covering the
flatlands, which seems to have the effect of washing away the dust and dirt of last year and
making everything pure and clean once again. To me at least, this is a good omen.

In the spirit of a new beginning that a new year always brings I wold like to offer this olive
branch to a few citizens whom I disagreed with last year, sometimes specifically in my capacity as
a Tribune:

Franciscus Apulus, Cordus, Scaevola, Pompeia Cornelia, Tullia, Titus Octavius, Gn. Marinus and in
particular our new Censor C Fabius whom I sometimes disagreed with politically while always
maintaining that I find him to be a true gentleman.

It's a new year ladies & gentlemen and for my part I am starting over and will not let any baggage
from the last year reflect in the way I interact with you during this coming year.

Valete,

Diana Moravia


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19059 From: Scriboni89@aol.com Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: For Roman Literature Lovers
Salve,

That sounds very interesting. I have very limited works on any of those
authors. Would you mind sending me the sellers name etc? I am on e-bay a lot. I
am interested in purchasing.

BENE.VALE.
I.MANERE.IN.AMORA.DI.ROMA.
ET.FORTIS.IN.FIDE.
GNAEVS.SCRIBONIVS.SCRIPTOR.
DI.NOVA.ROMA.ET.LEGIO.XXIV.MA.
ET.LVDVS.MAGNVS.GLADIATORE.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19060 From: Fr. Apulus Caesar Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: 2757 begins!
Salve Diana,

thank you very much, I appreciate your olive branch and your peaceful act.
I live in front of 25 km of olive trees and I love it as natural thing and
for what it means. My region (Apulia) is a land of peace, because it's the
bridge between Occident and Orient.
The olive branch means peace and it's a good thing. However, yes I disagreed
with some of your opinions but never there was war between us. I think the
political and correct opposition is a good thing, it means freedom and
growing of an organization. You know that I appreciate you and your skills,
you was a wonderful Tribune and one of the most passionated Magistrated.
Sometimes we worked togheter or talked about with a lovable tone. This is
enough for me to say that I'm not fighting with you and even there was
peace. :-)

At the end, thank you again, I wish you a wonderful year of peace and joy.

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19061 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Edictum Aedilicium Perpetuum
Edictum Aedilicium Perpetuum

In order to ensure continuity in the regulation of the Macellum and
fair business practices I issue the following edictum until M. Iulius
Perusianus and I can consult and issue our own edicta on such matters.

I. The edicta of Fr. Apulus Caesar and M. Equitius Marinus on matters
pertaining to the Macellum and fair business practices shall remain in
effect until further notice.

II. This edictum shall take effect immediately.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Aedilis Curulis

Given on the Kalendae Ianuarii in the consulship of Cn. Salix Astur
and Gn. Equitius Marinus.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19062 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: 2757 begins!
Salve Sceptius,

<Pity I don't get this olive branch offering.

Uh well that is because I never felt that we were having a serious disagreement. I thought that we
were colleagues working together and just not agreeing on one word in one law proposal. The end
result was that all the Tribunes ended up supporting the proposal 100% and it was happily voted in
by the CPlebT.

But if you feel that we were really disagreeing with things (and like I said I only recall the one
disagreement about one word!), then the olive branch goes to you as well :-)

<However, I wish you the best on your run for being a Senatrix, although some people believe that
<Nova Roma is a sort of "Popular contest". :-)

Well it is based on that a bit. But one becomes popular by working hard.

Vale,
Diana



________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19063 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Kalendae Ianuarii
G. Iulius Scaurus S. P. D.

Salvete, Quirites.

In addition to the usual aedilician duties I have decided to provide a
service to our citizens in the form of a daily announcement of civic
and religious festivals (feriae) regardless of whether their are
accompanied by public games or not.

Today is the Kalendae Ianuarii and the date of the festivals (feriae)
of the Anno Novo, the Vediovae, and Aesculapio. The day is fastus.

In Roma antiqua a sacrifice to Iuno and Ianus was made by a Pontifex
and the Rex Sacrorum in the Comitia Calabra after which the Pontifex
would announce the date of the Nonae Ianuarii. Shortly thereafter the
Regina Sacrorum made sacrifice to Iuno in the Regia

The Vediovae was the anniversary of the dedication of the temple of
Vediovis (sometimes called Veiovis) on the island of the Tiber.
Vediovis is an aspect of Iuppiter in relation to the Di Inferni upon
whose propitiation an auspicious new year was dependent. A sacrifice
to this chthonic aspect of the deity was made by the Flamen Dialis.

The feria of Aesculapio commemorated the anniversary of the dedication
of the temple of Aesculapius on the island of the Tiber in 291 BCE in
accordance with the instructions of the Sybilline Books. Offerings to
Aesculapius were made for the health and safety of the republic,
families, and individuals.

Valete.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Aedilis Curulis, Flamen Quirinalis et Pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19064 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: More Links
G. Iulius Scaurus S. P. D.

Salvete, Quirites.

Here's a link to "Campanaio, Sicily: A Geophysical Survey 1995":

http://csweb.bournemouth.ac.uk/consci/sicily/

This is a detailed site report on the geophysical evaluation of a
Roman rural settlement in Sicily with illustrations.

In piaculo for premature meeting of the terms of my vow to Venus
Genetrix, I offer the following link:

"Silchester Roman Town: The Insula IX 'Town Life' Project":

http://www.silchester.rdg.ac.uk/

This site contains a detailed description of the Univ. of Reading's
excavations of an insula in Silchester, including the 2003 season.

Valete.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19065 From: rexmarciusnr Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Re: the end of duties is coming up
Salvete Luci Pompei et collegae! Salvette cives novae Romae!


I Have been silent for quite some time now as I have been underwater
at work and also literally in a dive resort in the Southern
Philippines for the past few months and weeks.

I wish all new magistrates and Senators luck for their time in
office. From my experience here they will need it for a bipartisan
success story!

I thank all my former colleagues in the Academia and on the
Tribunician bench. It has been a privilege working with all of you!
As of 1st January I fulfill no more official function in Nova Roma!

Unfortunately I will not be able to participate much in Nova Roma
affairs this year (good news to some, I know) as my macronational
duties have increased substantially. Nonetheless I will have a peek
or two on the mainlist every week if I can.

Ad multos annos

Marcus Marcius Rex
Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19066 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Corrrection to Edictum Aedilicium Perpetuum
Edictum Aedilicium Perpetuum

In order to ensure continuity in the regulation of the Macellum and
fair business practices I issue the following edictum until M. Iulius
Perusianus and I can consult and issue our own edicta on such matters.

I. The edicta of Fr. Apulus Caesar and Gn. Equitius Marinus on matters
pertaining to the Macellum and fair business practices shall remain in
effect until further notice.

II. This edictum shall take effect immediately.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Aedilis Curulis

Given on the Kalendae Ianuarii in the consulship of Cn. Salix Astur
and Gn. Equitius Marinus.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19067 From: Marcus Bianchius Antonius Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Quaestor - Oath of Office
I, Marcus Bianchius Antonius (Gregory A. Dunn), do hereby solemnly swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests of its citizens and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Marcus Bianchius Antonius, swear to honor the gods and goddesses of Roma in my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman
Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Marcus Bianchius Antonius, swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Marcus Bianchius Antonius, swear to protect and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Marcus Bianchius Antonius, further swear to fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of Quaestor to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the gods and goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept the position of Quaestor and all the rights, privileges, obligations, and
responsibilities attendant thereto.




Marcus Bianchius Antonius
Propraetor, The Great Provincia Lacus Magni
Paterfamilias, gens Bianchia
Quaestor, Nova Roma

---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19068 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: File - List Guidelines, Main List
Ex Officio Praetorium

EDICTVM PRAETORICIVM DE MODERATIONE

The praetores of Nova Roma hereby define the guidelines for
appropriate usage of Nova Roma's public communication forum, currently
located at:
Nova_Roma@yahoogroups.com

These guidelines are based on the guidelines previously issued by
our predecessors (Pompeia Cornelia and Patricia Cassia). As praetores
of Nova Roma, though, we keep the right to change these guidelines in
the future.

I. The Nova Roma forum (herein referred to as 'the list') is set up
so that replies will automatically be sent to the entire list. Please
keep this in mind when you are replying. You are not issuing a
private email. If your reply is intended for only one member, and has
no benefit to the rest of the list subscribers, consider sending it
privately.

II. Posts that merely voice agreement with a previous post without
expanding on an issue in any way are discouraged.

III. Please trim your posts. When replying to a thread, snip
unnecessary sections of the original post for brevity, and indicate
where you have done so by printing <snipped> at the appropriate space.
Correct usage of snipping prevents large posts that can quickly fill
subscribers mailboxes

IV. If you feel you must dispute or criticize another person's post,
consider doing so in private.
Sometimes a person makes a genuine mistake, and your gentle correction
via private email means much more to them than potentially
embarrassing them in the forum over what is an innocent error. We know
that during political debates, private exchanges are impractical.
Please use discretion in this area.

V. It is entirely appropriate to disagree publicly with another's
stated views or another's actions as they report such, or with the
actions of Nova Roma's Magistrates, Senate or otherwise appointed
officials.
Nova Roma is an organization of individuals from a wide variety of
nations, religions, cultural backgrounds and political viewpoints, and
it is only reasonable that our views should differ.

Please consider the following when expressing disagreement of opposing
viewpoints:

* Express respect for the person and the entitlement to his opinion,
and faith in his or her good intentions.

* Point out any themes in which you do not agree.

* If in the criticism of a person's actions, perhaps in the capacity
of a magistrate or senator, point out specifically which actions you
are referring to. Quote the message number of the post in
which you base your account and opinions. This makes things more
objective and often helpful to the person in question, as to what,
specifically, you are referring to, and your issues with same.

* In an academic debate, endeavor to offer references to back up your
assertions.

* At all times maintain politeness in the expression of your opinion
and endeavour to respect the rights and opinions of others.

Inappropriate behaviour includes:

the use of profane language; misrepresentation of the truth for the
purpose of making another person look foolish; calling others names;
criticizing a poster's personal character as opposed to criticizing his
ideas; making derrogatory, belittling, subjective statements about the
Gods and Goddesses of Rome (quoting from a myth does not apply) or
belittling deities of other religions for entertainment. Further, in
the interests of those under 18, sexual references must be strictly
within the context of an historical discussion. Otherwise, they are to
be made in private.

The arbitrary advertisment of goods and services (SPAM) is not
permitted on the Nova Roma mainlist, unless the advertiser is a member
of Nova Roma's marketplace, the Macellum. Macellum merchants are
welcome to advertise from time to time in a low-key fashion. This
entails a signature line/file, a one-time announcement of initial
affiliation with the Macellum, advertising in response to a post of
inquiry made in the forum, or an ad once every three months or so
advertising your presence in the Macellum.

VI. If you feel that a post is inappropriate in any way, consider
mailing the individual concerned privately, explaining your rationale
for grievance and asking for clarification"

If you would like to talk to us confidentially about a particular
post, please contact us at praetors@... .

VII: During the time leading up to elections (held each November and
occasionally at other times if offices become vacant) this list is one
of the forums where candidates express their views and present their
qualifications to the populace. All of the strictures governing
appropriate behaviour mentioned hereto, shall remain in place and
apply to all candidates and their supporters.

VIII: Please do not give out personal information (i.e., address or
phone number) to the list. While it would be pleasant to believe we
are all good-hearted and sane, we are not; you cannot trust in that.

IX: Due to the influxes of SPAM and past incidents of posts from
those who wish nothing but to cause disruption and insult to the list,
or particular subscribers of the list, to wit, TROLLS, it has become
necessary to place all new list members on Moderated Status, just
until we are satisfied that such persons are indeed here to celebrate
aspects of Roma Antiquita and Nova Roma, as opposed to being here for
unjustifiable reasons. This is unfortunate, but it has proved
necessary.

X: Language Policies

The forum of Roma Antiquita was a large venue, with people of
different languages conversing, a few in this corner, a few in that
corner.
Rome was a very mulicultured place in her glory. Mind you official
information was in Latin, and in some cases Greek, but people were
free to speak informally as they wished in the language of their
choice.
Our constitution mandates freedom of communication provided it is not
dangerous or disruptive.

Currently, the praetores can understand Latin, Spanish, French,
Italian and Portuguese, so messages in those languages are most
welcome. For other languages, help can be obtained from the decuria of
interpreters of Nova Roma.

Thanks to the decuria of interpreters and to several magistrates or
legates who are willing to assist with list moderation, 'informal'
communication in the forum is open to most main languages. Feel free
to post in English, Latin, Italian, Portugese, Spanish, Fench, German,
Russian, Norwegian, Finnish, Swedish or any Slavik language. The
Praetors have many to thank for efforts in this regard.

***Exception: This does not contravene the Lex Cornelia de Linguis
Publicus
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/lege/index/html
which stipulates, though comitial mandate, that any offical government
legislation or priestly decrees must be issued in English or Latin
where applicable, so they can be translated verbatim into other
languages to be more easily understood by the entirety of the
populace.

XI. Topics of Discussion

The main focus of this list is Nova Roma and Roma Antiqua. However,
as members of a diverse international community we all have lives and
interests outside of Nova Roma. It is perfectly acceptable to discuss
non-Roman topics here, though keep in mind that not everyone may
share your interest in these topics.

XII: The Praetors have the imperium to govern the list, but prefer to
encourage positive interaction as opposed to punishing negative
behaviour. In the case of a poster whose actions violate these
guidelines aforementioned, the following escalated courses of
action shall be taken:

1.- A private memo from the Praetors' office or a Scribal designate,
stating the incident of infraction, and a reminder to review the
guidelines. Often people who are new to the list are not intentionally
trying to upset anybody.

2.- Another private memo as above.

3.- Moderated status (the poster may post but all posts
they issue are first reviewed by the Praetors or their designate).
The length of moderation shall be determined by the number of offences
in the past, the severity of the violation, and the intent to violate.
No citizen shall be kept in moderate status for more than 2 (two)
months
without a firm sentence issued by a legal court as described by the
Lex Salicia Iudiciaria:
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-11-24-iii.html

(For example: Nobody is going to be placed on moderated status for an
extended time for failure to trim posts or for saying 'me too')



Gnaeus Salix Astur,
Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus,
Praetores
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19069 From: Stefn_Ullarsson Date: 2004-01-01
Subject: Imperium is Affirmed
Sales et Fortuna Omnes,

Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus scripsit:

As a Lictor of Nova Roma and a member of the Comitia Curiata, I hereby
witness and acknowledge the passing of Imperium (the power, stemming
from the approval of the People by their votes, to carry out official
duties as specified in the Constitution and other Edicts, and to uphold
the Laws of Nova Roma) to the properly elected Magistrates of Nova Roma
for the Current Era year of 2004, which lays across the Years of the
City 2756 and 2757.

As a Lictor of Nova Roma, I likewise acknowledge Imperium for the
reconfirmed and newly named Provincial Magistrates, including those who
may be appointed during the coming year.

In Honor of the Holy Ones of Roma Antiqua et Nova, I ask Their Blessing
upon all our new magistrates. May my Northern Holy Ones likewise smile
upon Nova Rome, as all Tribal Peoples build the strengths of Mankind.

May all the new Magistrates, of Nation and Province, receive Wisdom and
Guidance from That Which They Hold Holy, to further the increase of
Romanitas. May the Sacred Bond between the Holy and the Profane build
Favor for the future of Nova Roma (our Senate, our Magistrates, our
People, our Life) in the coming year and in the future.

--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.

In amicus sub fidelis
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Lictor pro Nova Roma
Cives et Paterfamilias
Religio Septentrionalis et Poet

Living a worthy life need not be complicated at all.
Honor the Holy Powers in word and deed.
Honor your Family and Forebears.
Give heed to knowledge and skill.
Attempt to do that which is Right;
with Wisdom, Generosity and Personal Honor.
Read, Write, Love, Laugh, Hate, Cry, Cook, Build,
Sit quietly with family enjoying the birds flying by;
just be the best of that for which you are capable as a Man.
Remember that everything you do adds to the weight of your Past,
for Good or Ill. - Venii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19070 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: The passing of imperium
INVESTMENT OF IMPERIUM

I, Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus, as a Lictor of Nova Roma and a
member of the Comitia Curiata, hereby witness and acknowledge the
passing of Imperium - the power to carry out elected duties and
uphold the laws - to the duly elected Nova Roman magistrates for the
year 2757 AUC.

As a Lictor of Nova Roma I also recognize Imperium for all prorogued
and newly appointed Provincial Praetors of Nova Roma, and also
recognize that Imperium which may be bestowed upon those Provincial
Praetors or appointed during the course of the coming year."

May the Gods and the spirit of Roma Antiqua watch over the
Magistrates of Nova Roma, and grant them the guidance and wisdom to
use their Imperium for the positive furtherance of Romanitas and the
Religio Romana. May this sacred bond bring favor upon our Nation and
our Citizens in this coming year.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19071 From: Caius Curius Saturninus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: my oath of office for quaestor
I, Caius Curius Saturninus (Mikko Sillanpaa), do hereby solemnly
swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best
interests of its citizens and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Caius Curius Saturninus (Mikko
Sillanpaa), swear to honor the gods and goddesses of Roma in my
public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and
private life.

I, Caius Curius Saturninus (Mikko Sillanpaa), swear to uphold and
defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and
swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as the
State Religion.

I, Caius Curius Saturninus (Mikko Sillanpaa), swear to protect and
defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Caius Curius Saturninus (Mikko Sillanpaa), further swear to
fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of
Quaestor to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the
gods and goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor,
do I accept the position of Quaestor and all the rights, privileges,
obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.
--

Caius Curius Saturninus

Quaestor
Legatus Regionis Finnicae
Procurator Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
Praeses et Triumvir Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.insulaumbra.com/regiofinnica
www.insulaumbra.com/academiathules
gsm: +358-50-3315279
fax: +358-9-8754751
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19072 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: File - List Guidelines, Main List
<Ex Officio Praetorium

<EDICTVM PRAETORICIVM DE MODERATIONE

<The praetores of Nova Roma hereby define the guidelines for
<appropriate usage of Nova Roma's public communication forum, currently
<located at:
<Nova_Roma@yahoogroups.com

<Gnaeus Salix Astur,
<Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus,
<Praetores

Unless he staggered up in the middle of the night, hung this up in the Forum as a joke and then
went to bed, I don't think that our Proconsul extraordinaire Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus sent
this post Ex-Officio as a Praetor because I've just peaked over at him and he is out cold sleeping
off the inauguration party in his villa on the Pallatine surrounded by piles of soft pillows and
dark-haired slave girls from Greece. :-)

Vale,
Diana





________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19073 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Kalendae Ianuarii
Salvete Quirites; et salve, C. Iuli Scaure.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "g_iulius_scaurus" <gfr@w...> wrote:

> In addition to the usual aedilician duties I have decided to
> provide a service to our citizens in the form of a daily
> announcement of civic and religious festivals (feriae) regardless
> of whether their are accompanied by public games or not.

Thank you very much for providing us this information, pontifex.
I still remember the time when your colleague and my co-provincial,
the honoured pontifex A. Gryllus Graecus, posted everyday on the
calendrical events of the day to this very same list. He had to
discontinue that excellent service because of his lack of time, and I
have missed it very much since then.

S.V.B.E.E.V.
CN.SALIX.T.F.A.NEP.OVF.ASTVR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19074 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Acknowledgment of the Passing of Imperium
I, Gnaeus Salix Astur, as a Lictor of Nova Roma and a member of the
Comitia Curiata, hereby witness and acknowledge the passing of
Imperium - the power to carry out elected duties and uphold the laws -
to the duly elected Nova Roman magistrates for the year 2757 AUC.

As a Lictor of Nova Roma I also recognize Imperium for all prorogued
and newly appointed Provincial Praetors of Nova Roma, and also
recognize that Imperium which may be bestowed upon those Provincial
Praetors or appointed during the course of the coming year.

May the Gods and the spirit of Roma Antiqua watch over the
Magistrates of Nova Roma, and grant them the guidance and wisdom to
use their Imperium for the positive furtherance of Romanitas. May
this sacred bond bring favor upon our Nation and our Citizens in this
coming year.

S.V.B.E.E.V.
CN.SALIX.T.F.A.NEP.OVF.ASTVR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19075 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Kalendae Ianuarii
Ahh it is so nice to have someone posting that is also in the Roman time zone :-)

Salix said:

<Thank you very much for providing us this information, pontifex.

I'm breaking the list rules as recently sent in the edict by the Praetores by saying 'me too' (but
since it was signed by last years Praetores I don't think it was valid ha ha !!)

Thank you Scaurus! You're the best! I think that all of us are going to learn a great deal from
you this year.

Vale,
Diana Moravia




__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19076 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: 2757 begins!
Salve Honorable Diana Moravia!

To me You have always been a personal friend and we have exchanged
more than a few mails about private situations. Even if we often seem
to have disagreed during the last year there is no need to give any
olive branch to me. But of course I will accept it as a personal gift
in the spirit that it was given.

>In the spirit of a new beginning that a new year always brings I
>wold like to offer this olive
>branch to a few citizens whom I disagreed with last year, sometimes
>specifically in my capacity as
>a Tribune:
>
>Franciscus Apulus, Cordus, Scaevola, Pompeia Cornelia, Tullia, Titus
>Octavius, Gn. Marinus and in
>particular our new Censor C Fabius whom I sometimes disagreed with
>politically while always
>maintaining that I find him to be a true gentleman.
>
>It's a new year ladies & gentlemen and for my part I am starting
>over and will not let any baggage
>from the last year reflect in the way I interact with you during
>this coming year.
>
>Valete,
>
>Diana Moravia

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19077 From: O. Flavius Pompeius Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Kalendae Ianuarii
Salve,

This sounds like a wonderful idea, I look forward to it.

Is there anything that can be done for those in other time zones though? I got this email about the Kalends of January and it's the 2nd down under. Is there anyone in this time zone with the experience to perhaps help out?

Vale.

O. Flavius Pompeius




---------------------------------
Yahoo! Personals
- New people, new possibilities. FREE for a limited time!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19078 From: Gnaeus Octavius Noricus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Edictum Praetoricium
Edictum Praetoricium

I. The edictum of Cn. Salix Astur and D. Iunius Palladius concerning the
guidelines for the Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com list, issued on 2003-01-30
(http://novaroma.org/tabularium/edicts/praetor-2003-01-30.html), shall remain
in effect until further notice.

II. Last year's Praetores and their staff shall remain as moderators of the
Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com list until 2004-01-10 in order to insure a smooth
transition.

III. This edictum becomes effective immediately.

Gnaeus Octavius Noricus
Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19079 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Call for Candidates
Salvete Quirites.

There is one vacant position in our government: we still need to
elect one rogator. And one of our newly elected quaestores has
already announced his impossibility to accept the office, so we also
need to elect one quaestor. I hereby make a call for candidates to
fill these two important magistracies.

Candidates must write the consules at: consuls@... for their
candidacy to be included in the ballot. The consules will accept
candidacies for one nundina, until a.d. IV Idus Ianuarii, dies
Saturni (January the 10th, Saturday) at noon in Roma (12:00 am
Central European Time).

I invite all the citizens of Nova Roma to seriously consider
presenting your candidacy. Our Res Publica needs your willingness to
work in her behalf.

S.V.B.E.E.V.
CN.SALIX.T.F.A.NEP.OVF.ASTVR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19080 From: Gnaeus Octavius Noricus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Kalendae Ianuarii
Diana Moravia wrote:

| Ahh it is so nice to have someone posting that is also in the Roman time
| zone :-)

As long as it is not too early in the Roman time morning, that is...

| I'm breaking the list rules as recently sent in the edict by the Praetores
| by saying 'me too' (but since it was signed by last years Praetores I don't
| think it was valid ha ha !!)

That was an automated message that sneaked out under our radar. If M. Arminius
and I had issued it, we would at least have changed the names...
Besides that, it was (and is, he he) only discouraged to send "posts that
merely voice agreement with a previous post without expanding on an issue in
any way". It's not the use of the words "me too" that is undesired. There was
nothing wrong with your post under the old edictum, there wasn't on the day
where no edictum was in place formally, and there won't be under the new
edictum that's being worked on now. Sorry, but if you want to violate the
list guidlines, you'll have to try harder :-)

| Thank you Scaurus! You're the best! I think that all of us are going to
| learn a great deal from you this year.

And now is my turn to say "me too". I am looking forward to Scaurus' notices!
I'd like to join O. Flavius Pompeius though: Is it possible to send them
earlier, maybe on the day before? Thanks in advance!

--
Optime vale!

Gnaeus Octavius Noricus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19081 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Kalendae Ianuarii
Salve Noricus,

Yes! You're in my time zone too. Salix and I were the only ones hanging around in a nearly
deserted Forum :-)

<That was an automated message that sneaked out under our radar. If M. Arminius
<and I had issued it, we would at least have changed the names...

Honestly I figured that it was an automatic Yahoo message generated especially since it came from
Yahoogroups. I just couldn't resist mentioning that Palladius was virtually unconscious after the
virtual inauguration party so that he could not have posted that in our virtual Forum :-))

<Sorry, but if you want to violate the list guidlines, you'll have to try harder :-)
I'll do my best in the future (just kidding!)

Vale,
Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19082 From: Patricia Cassia Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Investment of Imperium
I, Patricia Cassia, as a Lictor of Nova Roma and a member of the
Comitia Curiata, hereby witness and acknowledge the passing of Imperium
- the power to carry out elected duties and uphold the laws - to the
duly elected Nova Roman magistrates for the year 2757 AUC.

As a Lictor of Nova Roma I also recognize Imperium for all prorogued
and newly appointed Provincial Praetors of Nova Roma, and also
recognize that Imperium which may be bestowed upon those Provincial
Praetors or appointed during the course of the coming year.

May the Gods and the spirit of Roma Antiqua watch over the Magistrates
of Nova Roma, and grant them the guidance and wisdom to use their
Imperium for the positive furtherance of Romanitas. May this sacred
bond bring favor upon our Nation and our Citizens in this coming year.



-----
Patricia Cassia
Senatrix et Sacerdos Minervalis
Nova Roma . pcassia@...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19083 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Oath of Office as Curator Araneum
I, Matt Hucke/Marcus Octavius Germanicus do hereby solemnly swear to
uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests
of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Marcus Octavius Germanicus
swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings,
and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Marcus Octavius Germanicus swear to uphold and defend the
Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to
act in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Marcus Octavius Germanicus swear to protect and defend the
Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Marcus Octavius Germanicus further swear to fulfill the
obligations and responsibilities of the office of Curator Araneum to
the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods
and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I
accept the position of Aedilis Curulis and all the rights, privileges,
obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.

--
Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
http://www.graveyards.com/
Anything worth doing is worth doing to excess;
moderation is for monks. - Heinlein
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19084 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Further Incorporations to the Senate
Cn. Salix Astur Quiritibus S.P.D.

In the last few days, the senatores of Nova Roma have received several
petitions written by some citizens of Nova Roma that asked for the
inclusion of the citizen Diana Moravia Aventina in the Album
Senatorialis.

The censores and the consules of Nova Roma have been discussing this
possibility during the last few days. This is our conclusion.

In the first place, we would like to commend Diana Moravia Aventina
for her enthusiastic and constant work for the Republic, and we would
like to encourage her to continue with it.

We have decided not to appoint Diana Moravia Aventina to the Senate so
far. This decision is based in the need to keep the number of senators
under a reasonable limit in relation to the population of Nova Roma.
Four new senatores have just been incorporated into the Senate, and
the censores are not planning to incorporate new senatores in the
immediate future. This, of course, does not mean that Diana Moravia
or others may not be incorporated to the Senate later on.

=====
S.V.B.E.E.V
CN.SALIX.T.F.A.NEP.OVF.ASTVR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19085 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Further Incorporations to the Senate
Salve Consul,

<We have decided not to appoint Diana Moravia Aventina to the Senate so
<far.

Thank you anyway for taking the time to consider me and the wishes of some of the citizens of this
Republic.

And of course you will see me continue to work for Nova Roma-- this I do out of love of Roma and
in honor of the Gods without the need of a prestigious title such as Senator, Tribune or even
Consul. I already have several 'jobs' this year. Besides raising the Temple of Venus to an
academic level, the Senate has already given me permission to organize a Roman Weekend in Germania
Inferior. And you can expect me to pop up as a Scriba for more than one magistrate this year.

Vale,
Diana Moravia
Sacerdos Veneris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19086 From: m_iulius@virgilio.it Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Rif: Re: [Nova-Roma] Adult SummerCamp & European Rally question
Avete Quintilianus et Diana,

>I hope that Culule Aedile Illustris Marcus Julius Perusianus will
>take care of that. I hope the tradition that one (or two) European
>Curule Aediles shall organise a Nova Roman Rally each year

Still haven't talked with anyone (colleagues, European citizens, Italic
curia, etc.) about this yet. But I can tell you that the tradition won't
be interrupted! Should an European province not candidate, I guess we can
have another meeting in Italia.

valete

M IVL PERVSIANVS



Caeso Fabius Quintilianus <christer.edling@...>
31/12/03 01.18

Per: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Marcus Julius Perusianus <MAnselmi@...>
Oggetto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Adult SummerCamp & European Rally question


Salve Illustra Diana!

I hope that Culule Aedile Illustris Marcus Julius Perusianus will
take care of that. I hope the tradition that one (or two) European
Curule Aediles shall organise a Nova Roman Rally each year. Thule
will probably have a long needed Provincial meeting in Regio Finnica
next year. We will probably discuss mostly provincial issues as many
of us have given a lot of tíme to the central governament and it is
time to take a deep look at our provincia again.

>Salve Tiberius,
>
>Ok now that I know what an Adult summer Camp is.
>
>< He said one <of the reasons for so much
><in-fighting on the main list was simple, we have very few face to
>face meetings and really do not
><know each other very well.
>
>I've said the exact same thing often enough and so I agree with that
>assessment 100%. The camp
>would bring us one step further from breaking out of this virtual
>world. It may be hard to get
>organized but I will leave that up to you Tribune-elect :-)
>
>A question for our European citizens and/or Caeso Fabius: where will
>the next European Rally take
>place? I would love it if it were in Belgium again but its been done
>already. How about Köln or
>the Netherlands?
>
>Vale,
>Diana

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Consul et Senator
Propraetor Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Consulis CFQ
http://www.insulaumbra.com/cohors_consulis_cfq/
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19087 From: m_iulius@virgilio.it Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Rif: [NR_Italia] EDICTUM PROPRAETORICIUM XV DE URBE ROMAE RATA HABE
M IVL Perusianus et Domitius CONST Fuscus Aediles Urbis Pro Temporibus CN
SAL Asturi Consuli Quiritibusque SPD

we, 'pro tempore' Aedilis Urbis Romae , appointed by our governor, Senator
Franciscus Apulus Caesar, on behalf of the Nova Roman citizens living in
the city of Rome, wish to thank who supported and acknowleged us in the
building of our community.
Hoping our could be an example for all the other NR citizens in the world.

thanks
valete

Roma Caput Mundi

----------------------

noi, gli Aediles Urbis pro tempore dell'Urbs, nominati dal nostro governatore,
il Senatore Franciscus Apulus Caesar, da parte dei cittadini Nova Romani
che vivono nella città di Roma, desideriamo ringraziare coloro che ci hanno
supportato e reso merito per la costituzione della nostra comunità.
Sperando che possiamo essere di esempio a tutti gli altri cittadini Novaromani
nel mondo.

grazie
valete

Roma Caput Mundi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19088 From: m_iulius@virgilio.it Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Oath of Office as Aedilis Curulis
I, Milko Anselmi/Marcus Iulius Perusianus do hereby solemnly swear to uphold
the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests of the people
and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Milko Anselmi/Marcus Iulius Perusianus
swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and
to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Milko Anselmi/Marcus Iulius Perusianus swear to uphold and defend the
Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act
in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Milko Anselmi/Marcus Iulius Perusianus swear to protect and defend the
Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Milko Anselmi/Marcus Iulius Perusianus further swear to fulfill the obligations
and responsibilities of the office of Aedilis Curulis to the best of my
abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods and
Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept the
position of Aedilis Curulis and all the rights, privileges, obligations,
and responsibilities attendant thereto.

May the Di Immortales bless, preserve, and protect Nova Roma!

Given in Italia Provincia, on the January 2nd 2004, in the consulship of
Cn. Salix Astur and Gn. Equitius Marinus.

Marcus Iulius Perusianus
--------------------------------------------------------------
Legatus Internis Rebus et Scriba ad historiam Provinciae Italiae
Magister Academiae Italicae
--------------------------------------------------------------
Home Page: http://www.geocities.com/m_iulius
Italia Provincia: http://italia.novaroma.org
Cohors FAC: http://italia.novaroma.org/fac
SignaRomanorum: http://italia.novaroma.org/signaromanorum
--------------------------------------------------------------
AEQVAM MEMENTO REBVS IN ARDVIS SERVARE MENTEM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19089 From: labienus@novaroma.org Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Investment of Imperium
T Labienus Fortunatus Lictor omnibus SPD

As a Lictor Curiatae of Nova Roma, I hereby witness and acknowledge the passing
of imperium - the power to carry out elected duties and uphold the laws - to
the duly elected Nova Roman magistrates for the year 2757 AUC.

I also recognize imperium for all prorogued and newly appointed provincial
praetores of Nova Roma, and also recognize that imperium which is bestowed upon
any provincial praetores who may be appointed during the course of the coming
year.

May the Gods and the spirit of Roma Antiqua watch over the magistrates of Nova
Roma, and grant them the guidance and wisdom to use their imperium for the
positive furtherance of Romanitas. May this sacred bond bring favor upon our
nation and our cives in this coming year.

Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19090 From: C. Iulius Iustinus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Question about the gens
I'm not entirely sure that I understand the Roman gens, so I'll ask the
experts on the list. I understand that both Roma Antiqua and Nova Roma are
divided into gens, which are loosely analogous to clans. In Nova Roma there
are both patrician and plebian gens. Easy enough. But, as I read about Roma
Antiqua the situation -- on the surface at least -- appears to have been
more complex. I am currently reading a bit about Publius Clodius Pulcher,
and if I understand correctly, he was a member of the Claudian gens but
preferred a plebian spelling. Eventually, he renounced his patrician rank
and was elected tribune. Looking at the details of renouncing his patrician
rank, what I'm getting is something I don't understand. My source seems to
say that he was adopted by Publius Fonteius and that he was adopted by a
plebian member of his own gens. So then, did the various gens of Roma
Antiqua have both patrician and plebian branches? Was Fonteius a Clodian,
and if so, was Clodius a part of Fonteius' name that is being omitted from
my source for the sake simplicity? Or, were there instances where a person's
name did not reflect his or her gens? Or, am I misunderstanding and Fonteius
was distaff relative? Finally, are my questions perhaps related to the issue
of gens reform in Nova Roma?

I hope I'm not merely asking for a re-hash of old discussions, but I wasn't
able to find anything in the archive that addressed this question.

_____________________________
C. Iulius Iustinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19091 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Question about the gens
Salvete Quirites, et salve Cai Iuli,

C. Iulius Iustinus wrote:

[about Publius Clodius Pulcher]
> So then, did the various gens of Roma Antiqua have
> both patrician and plebian branches?

Yes, some did.

> Was Fonteius a Clodian,

I don't know of any evidence to that effect.

For more coverage, see

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publius_Clodius_Pulcher

Valete!

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19092 From: labienus@novaroma.org Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Question about the gens
Salvete C Iuli Iustine omnesque

> But, as I read about Roma Antiqua the situation -- on the surface at least --
> appears to have been more complex.

It was much more complex than Nova Roma's current situation, which is to be
expected of a system that developed organically over the course of a few
centuries and involved thousands of people.

> So then, did the various gens of Roma Antiqua have both patrician and plebian
> branches?

Yes. The gentes were clans, though their members were not necessarily related
by blood. Any given gens was comprised of many familiae. A familia was an
extended family, including a paterfamilias at its head and all of the people
who were "in his hand". This would include his wife (though she might still be
in her father's hand, depending on the arrangements of their marriage), all of
his children (and their children, etc.), and any slaves owned by the rest of
the familia.

When a male member of the familia was freed from the paterfamilias' hand (i.e.
emancipated), he became a paterfamilias of a new familia in the same gens.
This was true of freed slaves, who would usually not be blood relations with
the paterfamilias. A woman who was freed would generally pass back to the hand
of her father or, if he was dead, her nearest male relative.

Note that a woman did not change gentes, though she changed familiae, when she
passed from the hand of her father to the hand of her husband. A woman's nomen
therefore would not match the nomen of her husband. It's my understanding that
it would have been seen as somewhat incestuous for e.g. a Claudia to marry a
Claudius, especially in the earlier years of the Republic.

The familia determined one's order, so a gens contained both patrician and
plebeian familiae.

> Was Fonteius a Clodian, and if so, was Clodius a part of Fonteius' name that
> is being omitted from my source for the sake simplicity?

I don't know. I've generally assumed that Fonteius was a member of Gens
Fonteia. Perhaps someone more knowledgable will tell us.

> Or, were there instances where a person's name did not reflect his or her
> gens?

As far as I know, a person's nomen matched his or her gens. Considering the
number of people we're talking about, I assume that there were exceptions--
especially after people outside of the Roman city-state were granted civitas.
In general, someone who gained civitas entered the gens of the magistrate who
granted it.

> Finally, are my questions perhaps related to the issue of gens reform in Nova
> Roma?

Inasmuch as they touch upon how unhistorical Nova Roma's current gens system
is, they are.

Valete
T Labienus Fortunatus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19093 From: Decimus Iunius Silanus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Edictum Censoricium
Salvete Omnes,

I wish to express my enormous gratitude to Caius
Flavius Diocletianus and Marcus Octavius Germanicus
for bestowing upon me this greatest of honours.

Valete

Decimus Iunius Silanus.


> Ex Officio
> Caius Flavius Diocletianus et Marcus Octavius
> Germanicus Censores
>
> I. Based on the Consitution of Nova Roma, Par.
> IV.A.1.d., and the Lex
> Vedia Senatoria, Par. II., the following citizens
> are added to the
> Album Senatorium:
>
> Decimus Iunius Silanus, Propraetor Britanniae
> Franciscus Apulus Caesar, Propraetor Italiae
>
> II. This Edictum becomes effective immediately.
>
> Given Dec 30 in the year of the consulship of Caeso
> Fabius
> Quintilianus and Titus Labienus Fortunatus, 2756
> AUC.
>
> Caius Flavius Diocletianus
> Censor
>
> Marcus Octavius Germanicus
> Censor
>
>
> Post Scriptum:
>
> This, citizens, is my last public action during my
> 2-years term of
> office. it was a pleasure to serve both you and the
> res publica. It
> was also a pleasure to work together with my
> colleagues, Lucius
> Equitius Cincinnatus and Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
> Best wishes to
> you and a happy new year 2757 AUC.
>
> Caius Flavius Diocletianus
> Censor
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19094 From: Decimus Iunius Silanus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Investment of Imperium
INVESTMENT OF IMPERIUM

I, Decimus Iunius Silanus, as a Lictor of Nova Roma
and a member of the Comitia Curiata, hereby witness
and acknowledge the passing of Imperium - the power to
carry out elected duties and uphold the laws - to the
duly elected Nova Roman magistrates for the year 2757
AUC.

As a Lictor of Nova Roma I also recognize Imperium for
all prorogued and newly appointed
Provincial Praetors of Nova Roma, and also recognize
that Imperium which
may be bestowed upon those Provincial Praetors or
appointed during the course
of the coming year."

May the Gods and the spirit of Roma Antiqua watch over
the Magistrates of
Nova Roma, and grant them the guidance and wisdom to
use their Imperium for
the positive furtherance of Romanitas. May this sacred
bond bring favor upon
our Nation and our Citizens in this coming year.



________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19095 From: Decimus Iunius Silanus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Thank you's (again)!!
Salvete,

A very big thank you to all those who have wished me
well on my adlection to the senate. Apologies for my
tardiness in replying but I am currently on holiday
with limited internet access and a troublesome French
keyboard.

Normal service will be resumed tomorrow upon my return
home :-)

Valete

Decimus Iunius Silanus

________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19096 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Renewal of Consular Edicta
Salvete Quirites.

The consules of Nova Roma have decided that none of the edicta issued
by last year's consules need to be re-issued by them. This is, of
course, due to the fact that those affairs that are not of a temporal
nature have been (righteously so) presented to the Comitia as
legislative proposals and not issued as edicta.

S.V.B.E.E.V.
CN.SALIX.T.F.A.NEP.OVF.ASTVR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19097 From: Thomas Gangale Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: [ComitiaCuriata] Imperium is Affirmed
I, Marcus Martianus Gangalius, as a Lictor of Nova Roma and a member of the
Comitia Curiata, hereby witness and acknowledge the passing of Imperium -
the power to carry out elected duties and uphold the laws - to the duly
elected Nova Roman magistrates for the year 2757 AUC.
As a Lictor of Nova Roma I also recognize Imperium for all prorogued and
newly appointed
Provincial Praetors of Nova Roma, and also recognize that Imperium which
may be bestowed upon those Provincial Praetors or appointed during the course
of the coming year."

May the Gods and the spirit of Roma Antiqua watch over the Magistrates of
Nova Roma, and grant them the guidance and wisdom to use their Imperium for
the positive furtherance of Romanitas. May this sacred bond bring favor upon
our Nation and our Citizens in this coming year.

Marcus Martianus Gangalius
Lictor
Legatus, California Superior
Paterfamilias, Gens Martiana

<http://www.martiana.org/>M A R T I A N A
Contendere, explorare, invenire, et non cedere.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19098 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Fwd: Confirming Imperium
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19099 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: FW Confirming Imperium
whoops! forgot to include the message from Metellus.

In a message dated 1/2/04 3:07:36 PM Pacific Standard Time, Sminla writes:
> L. Fabius Metellus S.P.D
>
> Salvete
>
> As a Lictor of Nova Roma and a member of the Comitia Curiata, I hereby
> witness and acknowledge the passing of Imperium: that power,
> approved by the People by their voting, to carry out official
> duties as specified in the Constitution and other Edicts, and to uphold
> the Laws of Nova Roma, to the properly elected Magistrates of Nova Roma and
> the duly appointed Provincial Praetors for the Current Year of the City 2757.
>
> Mother Vesta preserve us all.
>
> Valete
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19100 From: Clint Johnson Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Oath of Office as Quaestor
I, Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa (Clint Johnson), do hereby solemnly swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests of its citizens and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa, swear to honor the gods and goddesses of Roma in my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman
Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa, swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa, swear to protect and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa, further swear to fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of Quaestor to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the gods and goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept the position of Quaestor and all the rights, privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.



---------------------------------
Post your free ad now! Yahoo! Canada Personals


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19101 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Call for Candidates
SALVETE CIVES

I prontly answer to the call of our Honorable Consul Cn. Salix
Astur, and I declare my firm intention to be candidated for the
Questorship for the current year:


SALVETE QUIRITES!

I am speaking here in front of you all Cives Nova Romani, and I hope
the sweet-smelling wind of our Forum will drive my words in all of
your houses.
I stand here at the Rostra, enlightened by the sun that always
kisses our Patria, declaring my intention to candidate myself for
the Questorship for the year 2757 a.U.c..

Here, blinded by the eternal light of Roma, with my honorable blood
owing to Gens Iulia, I offer to you all my service for our Res
Publica.

In this one and half year I've decided to join Nova Roma, all my
efforts were done for the growth of our Dream in Italia. I offered
and gave my help to Franciscus Apulus Caesar and Manius Constantinus
Serapio for creating a strong basis of meetings in various cities
of Italia, I put all my pledge for the diffusion of Roman Culture
and Roman Virtues, as I truly believe in our common ideals.
I have been taking care of the project for the restoration of the
Temple of Magna Mater; untill now this work has been directed by one
of the best Cives we all have, the new elected Aedilis Curulis
Marcus Iulius Perusianus. We two have been working together in the
past months, and we know we are a strong and fearless team.
Finally, I was involved in the structure of Academia Italica, our
sharp weapon for the circulation of Roman Values and Culture in our
Provincia.

You have to be sure of one thing: I will do all these things better
and better, in the future.

With your vote, I will start my Cursus Honorum with the Questorship,
and I will dispose all my abilities and my knowledges for our Res
Publica.

Optime Valete,

Lucius Iulius Sulla,
Civis Romanus


OPTIME VALETE
L IUL SULLA
Italia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19102 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Return
Salve All

Good day to everyone,and a Happy New Year to all. I would like to give my apologies to everyone in NR for my unexplained absence for six months. All I can say is I had to leave quickly in order to serve with the Canadian Armed Forces, and I can not say where. My departure was very quickly done, and left no room to explain to anyone what it was about, I had to accept and say nothing(even saying this may backfire on me). I realize that I have let down a lot of people, but I can say now I am here to stay! So please accept me back to NR.

Quintus Sertorius



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19103 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Saying what? I heard nothing. ;-)

Welcome back!

Drusus

Nathan Guiboche wrote:

>
> Salve All
>
> Good day to everyone,and a Happy New Year to all. I would like to
> give my apologies to everyone in NR for my unexplained absence for six
> months. All I can say is I had to leave quickly in order to serve
> with the Canadian Armed Forces, and I can not say where. My departure
> was very quickly done, and left no room to explain to anyone what it
> was about, I had to accept and say nothing(even saying this may
> backfire on me). I realize that I have let down a lot of people, but
> I can say now I am here to stay! So please accept me back to NR.
>
> Quintus Sertorius
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> *Yahoo! Groups Sponsor*
> ADVERTISEMENT
> <http://rd.yahoo.com/SIG=12cutift4/M=267637.4116730.5333196.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705313712:HM/EXP=1073173965/A=1853619/R=0/*http://www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60178356&partid=4116730>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Yahoo! Groups Links*
>
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19104 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Salve Illustris Quintus Sertorius!

No problem, I am glad to see You again!

>Salve All
>
>Good day to everyone,and a Happy New Year to all. I would like to
>give my apologies to everyone in NR for my unexplained absence for
>six months. All I can say is I had to leave quickly in order to
>serve with the Canadian Armed Forces, and I can not say where. My
>departure was very quickly done, and left no room to explain to
>anyone what it was about, I had to accept and say nothing(even
>saying this may backfire on me). I realize that I have let down a
>lot of people, but I can say now I am here to stay! So please
>accept me back to NR.
>
>Quintus Sertorius

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19105 From: Julilla Sempronia Magna Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nathan Guiboche" <nate@m...> wrote:
>
> Salve All
>
> Good day to everyone,and a Happy New Year to all. I would like to
give my apologies to everyone in NR for my unexplained absence for
six months. All I can say is I had to leave quickly in order to
serve with the Canadian Armed Forces, and I can not say where. My
departure was very quickly done, and left no room to explain to
anyone what it was about, I had to accept and say nothing(even saying
this may backfire on me). I realize that I have let down a lot of
people, but I can say now I am here to stay! So please accept me
back to NR.
>
> Quintus Sertorius

Welcome back, mi Sertori, and thank you for your service to your
country!

---
IVLI.SEMPRON.MAGN.T.P.
@____@ Julilla Sempronia Magna
||||
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19106 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Salvete,

As I have often said, I gladly dedicate my time to Nova Roma and since I see that there is an
opening for Quaestor that needs to be filled, I hereby declare my candidacy for Quaestor of Nova
Roma.

I have been a citizen of Nova Roma since her infancy in 1999 and since then have served as a
Scriba to now Censor Caeso Fabius and later went on to serve as Trbiune. In 2755 I was appointed
Priestess of Venus.

The position of Quaestor is to administer the funds allocated by the Senate to the consuls,
praetors, and aediles. My qualifications that are specifically relevant to this position is that I
was the Assistant Vice President of Fuji Bank for 9 years which had been located in the World
Trade Center and was personally responsible for the management and investment of 4 billion USD per
day. I later went on to work in Belgium for Big Fives: in Antwerp for Ernst & Young and then in
Brussels Belgium for Deloitte and Touche, in both cases as the manager of their Financial
Administration department.

Valete,
Diana Moravia Aventina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19107 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Salve Quinte Sertori!

> Good day to everyone,and a Happy New Year to all.

And a fine Happy New Year to you too. It's great to see you back
among us.

> ... So please accept me back to NR.

I can't imagine anyone would suggest otherwise.

Vale,

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19108 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
AVE DIANA AVENTINA

Believe me when I say I think you are one of the most pleasant
people here in Nova Roma. I just hope you will not feel hurted by my
words in this message (even though I fear you will!).

When you lost the election for Consulship you wrote in message
#18529:

>My Goddess has chosen to keep me specifically for herself and
>that makes the Consulship a poor consolation prize!

Then you added:

>I also made an offering to Venus Victrix and without explanation,
>one of the candles popped in a very loud way. I understood this to
>mean that Venus would have me lose so that I could focus on the
>Religio this year, which has always been my first love.

How is it now that you are presenting your candidacy as Quaestor?
Are you acting against what you interpreted as the Will of Venus, or
maybe you got another sign from Her which you interpreted in the
opposite way?

Then, if Consulship is 'a poor consolation prize', what about
Quaestorship?

Last but not least (and I think this will be the part you will like
less, I am sorry), the recent discussion on the new law about the
Comitia Centuriata voting system showed two things. The first one is
that, sad to say, you were not able to make a calculation which was
a bit more complicate than the one required by the previous system.
The second one is that you voted for a law which proposed a voting
system which you were not understanding, or you understood wrongly.
That is not what I look for in a Quaestor.

If you wish to answer this mail, I would beg you to answer all of my
points. Thank you!

OPTIME VALE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Former Quaestor (2756 AVC)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19109 From: Marcus Octavius Germanicus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
> Then, if Consulship is 'a poor consolation prize', what about
> Quaestorship?

Quaestorship is far less time-consuming and stressful than Consulship.
Indeed, any magistracy can be said to be so.

I am very pleased to see that Diana is ready and willing to continue
her service to Nova Roma.

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Germanicus.
http://www.graveyards.com/
Anything worth doing is worth doing to excess;
moderation is for monks. - Heinlein
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19110 From: Fr. Apulus Caesar Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Supporting Lucius Iulius Sulla
Salvete Omnes,
I support the candidacy of my friend Lucius Iulius Sulla and invite you to
vote for him.
He's one of the most skilled and experienced new citizen of Nova Roma. I was
very impressed when I started to work with him: he has passion, dedication,
modesty and intelligence when he accomplish the hard jobs.
I tested his skills when I organized the last Nova Roman Rally in Bologna.
But first of all in Provincia Italia: he's contacting several famous italian
roman experts receiving very good and interesting interviews for Nova Roma.
It was an hard job because this experts are the èlite of the historical and
archeological academical world in Europe.
And I have to add that if elected he could make a great and wonderful job
serving our Curule Aedile Marcus Iulius Perusianus in the important project
of Magna Mater.

So, at the end I invite you again to support and vote for Iulius Sulla.

VAlete
Franciscus Apulus Caesar
------------------------------
NOVA ROMA
------------------------------
Senator
Tribunus Plebis
Propraetor Italiae - http://italia.novaroma.org
Scriba et Accensus
Pater Familiae Gens Apula - http://italia.novaroma.org/apula/
Vicarius Academiae Italicae - http://italia.novaroma.org/academiaitalica/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19111 From: Fr. Apulus Caesar Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: the port of Neapolis
Salvete Omnes,
the article belowe (in italian, please translate with babefish) by the
Italian Cultural Ministry is very important for the roman archeology.
Building a new branch of the underground of Naples, it have been discovered
the ancient port of Neapolis with a big boat (10mt x 2mt) of the II century
A.C. Other features and important roman and medioeval objects have been
discovered. The local Istitution said that everything will be taken of care
in the original position and the travellers of teh underground could visit
the ruins every day.

Valete
Fr. Apulus Caesar


SOTTO PIAZZA MUNICIPIO, IL PORTO ROMANO DI NAPOLI
Il ritrovamento della struttura portuale, avvenuto nel corso degli
scavi per il Metrò, ha permesso d'intercettare, a dieci metri dal livello
stradale, anche una barca del II secolo d.C.. Lo scavo di Piazza Nicola
Amore, invece, ha riportato alla luce un palazzo d'età imperiale e una
fontana medioevale.

di Carlo Avvisati

Per adesso, dello scafo si conoscono solo la lunghezza: 10 metri, e la
larghezza, 2 metri, visto che l'imbarcazione è ancora inglobata nel fango.
Poi, quando tra qualche giorno inizieranno i lavori di recupero, si potranno
fare delle ipotesi sul tipo e sull'impiego che quel legno dovette avere,
1800 anni fa. I primi dati, appunto la lunghezza e la larghezza, rimandano
immediatamente all'altra barca, quella che fu rinvenuta a Ercolano, di
fronte ai fornici dell'antica spiaggia, nel 1982. Anche quella imbarcazione,
quando venne recuperata dal fango, risultò essere 10 metri lunga e 2 metri e
20 centimetri larga. La barca ercolanese, impiegata per la pesca costiera,
era a struttura sfinata, simile a un gozzo marinaro moderno, e poteva avere
sino a sei rematori, visto che aveva sei scalmiere (sono gli alloggiamenti
per i remi). Quale fosse, invece, l'uso che all'epoca si fece della barca
scoperta in quello che dovette essere una sorta di retroporto del porto
romano della Neapolis antica si capirà allorché gli esperti saranno in grado
di "leggere" i segni: numero di scalmi, presenza di anfore o altra
ceramica, attrezzature per la pesca (ami, reti). Da questi elementi si
comprenderà se lo scafo fosse usato per la pesca oppure era un piccolo legno
utilizzato per trasportare merci generiche o di un tipo particolare.
Sicuramente importante, invece, dovette essere quell'edificio di epoca
augustea intercettato, sempre sulla stessa linea di scavo del Metrò, a
Piazza Nicola Amore,distante poche centinaia di metri da Piazza Municipio. I
resti del frontone del palazzo sono in marmo e presentano fondamenta
imponenti. Inoltre, i tecnici della Soprintendenza Archeologica di Napoli,
coordinati da Daniela Giampaola, l'archeloga responsabile dello scavo, hanno
anche catalogato un mosaico, a tessere bianche e nere, ancora parzialmente
sotterrato. Ancora, si sono ritrovate tombe, forse medievali, e una fontana,
perfettamente coservata, risalente al 1300. I resti rinvenuti in Piazza
Nicola Amore, secondo l'assessore all'Urbanistica di Napoli, Rocco Papa,
resteranno nella loro sede e si provvederà a renderli visibili ai
viaggiatori del Metrò. Per le altre centinaia di reperti rinvenuti nel corso
dello scavo, invece, si prospetta una opportuna collocazione in un futuro
"Museo del mare" cittadino.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19112 From: nateguiboche Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Salve Drusus!

Thank you for the welcome! I makes me FEEL welcome! I have much to
catch up on.

QS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Sicinius Drusus" <drusus@b...>
wrote:
> Saying what? I heard nothing. ;-)
>
> Welcome back!
>
> Drusus
>
> Nathan Guiboche wrote:
>
> >
> > Salve All
> >
> > Good day to everyone,and a Happy New Year to all. I would like
to
> > give my apologies to everyone in NR for my unexplained absence
for six
> > months. All I can say is I had to leave quickly in order to
serve
> > with the Canadian Armed Forces, and I can not say where. My
departure
> > was very quickly done, and left no room to explain to anyone
what it
> > was about, I had to accept and say nothing(even saying this may
> > backfire on me). I realize that I have let down a lot of
people, but
> > I can say now I am here to stay! So please accept me back to NR.
> >
> > Quintus Sertorius
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > *Yahoo! Groups Sponsor*
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> >
<http://rd.yahoo.com/SIG=12cutift4/M=267637.4116730.5333196.1261774/D
=egroupweb/S=1705313712:HM/EXP=1073173965/A=1853619/R=0/*http://www.n
etflix.com/Default?mqso=60178356&partid=4116730>
> >
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
-------
> > *Yahoo! Groups Links*
> >
> > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
> >
> > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?
subject=Unsubscribe>
> >
> > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19113 From: nateguiboche Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Thnak you Drusus!! It means a lot.

QS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Sicinius Drusus" <drusus@b...>
wrote:
> Saying what? I heard nothing. ;-)
>
> Welcome back!
>
> Drusus
>
> Nathan Guiboche wrote:
>
> >
> > Salve All
> >
> > Good day to everyone,and a Happy New Year to all. I would like
to
> > give my apologies to everyone in NR for my unexplained absence
for six
> > months. All I can say is I had to leave quickly in order to
serve
> > with the Canadian Armed Forces, and I can not say where. My
departure
> > was very quickly done, and left no room to explain to anyone
what it
> > was about, I had to accept and say nothing(even saying this may
> > backfire on me). I realize that I have let down a lot of
people, but
> > I can say now I am here to stay! So please accept me back to NR.
> >
> > Quintus Sertorius
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > *Yahoo! Groups Sponsor*
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> >
<http://rd.yahoo.com/SIG=12cutift4/M=267637.4116730.5333196.1261774/D
=egroupweb/S=1705313712:HM/EXP=1073173965/A=1853619/R=0/*http://www.n
etflix.com/Default?mqso=60178356&partid=4116730>
> >
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
-------
> > *Yahoo! Groups Links*
> >
> > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
> >
> > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?
subject=Unsubscribe>
> >
> > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19114 From: nateguiboche Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Salve Sir

It is good to hear this from you, as I had hoped to work closely
with you this past year.

QS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
<christer.edling@t...> wrote:
> Salve Illustris Quintus Sertorius!
>
> No problem, I am glad to see You again!
>
> >Salve All
> >
> >Good day to everyone,and a Happy New Year to all. I would like
to
> >give my apologies to everyone in NR for my unexplained absence
for
> >six months. All I can say is I had to leave quickly in order to
> >serve with the Canadian Armed Forces, and I can not say where.
My
> >departure was very quickly done, and left no room to explain to
> >anyone what it was about, I had to accept and say nothing(even
> >saying this may backfire on me). I realize that I have let down
a
> >lot of people, but I can say now I am here to stay! So please
> >accept me back to NR.
> >
> >Quintus Sertorius
>
> --
>
> Vale
>
> Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
> Censor, Consularis et Senator
> Proconsul Thules
> Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
> Civis Romanus sum
> ************************************************
> Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
> "I'll either find a way or make one"
> ************************************************
> Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
> Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19115 From: nateguiboche Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
> Welcome back, mi Sertori, and thank you for your service to your
> country!
>
> ---
> IVLI.SEMPRON.MAGN.T.P.
> @____@ Julilla Sempronia Magna
> ||||

Salve Julilla

Thank you for the kind words, although some times I wonder as to the
cost!

QS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19116 From: nateguiboche Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Salve Gnaeus

Thank you for the welcome back, but there is much I must do before I
FEEL I have will have repaid that welcome.

QS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Bill Gawne <gawne@c...> wrote:
> Salve Quinte Sertori!
>
> > Good day to everyone,and a Happy New Year to all.
>
> And a fine Happy New Year to you too. It's great to see you back
> among us.
>
> > ... So please accept me back to NR.
>
> I can't imagine anyone would suggest otherwise.
>
> Vale,
>
> --
> Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19117 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
G. Iulius Scaurus M. Constantino Serapioni salutem dicit.

Salve, M. Constantine.

In the first hours after the consular election results were announced
I received 26 emails from citizens who asked me to explain how the
system worked, since I was one of C. Fabius' collaborators in writing
the Lex Fabia de Ratione Comitiorum Centuriorum. Those were just the
ones who bothered to ask. I received almost as many emails asking me
if the results of the Lex Fabia were the same as those which the
fully historical Roman system would produce (my answer: for the late
republic, probably yes; for the early and middle republic, probably
no -- the systems differed slightly after the Sullan dictatorship).
I don't think D. Moravia was close to alone in being confused by the
alternative voting system. I opposed it when the law was being
written (ask A. Apollonius about the amount of bandwith we expanded
on that discussion) and supported the law despite it because other
parts of the law increased the historicity of our electoral system.
I suspect D. Moravia supported it for the same reason.

You may get away with snidely suggesting that D. Moravia is too
stupid to be a quaestor, but you'll have a hell of a fight on your
hands if you suggest the same about me -- we both supported the law
for the same reason: a partly more historical law is better than no
more historical law. And far more citizens were confused by the
system than you think.

Vale.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19118 From: Lucius Pompeius Octavianus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Latinoamericanos : recordatorio
Salvete omnes

Atención ciudadanos latinoamericanos : les recuerdo que ya está
funcionando la lista NR latinamerica para todos los ciudadanos
latinoamericanos de Nova Roma :
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NRlatinamerica . La lista es en español
y portugués.
Espero encontrarlos en dicha lista.

Attention Novaroman citizens from latinamerica. I remind you that the
list for latinamericans novaromans is already working :
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NRlatinamerica . Languagues in the list
are : spanish and portuguese.
I hope to meet you there

Bene vale
L. Pompeius Octavianus
Co-moderator NRLAtinamerica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19119 From: Lucius Pompeius Octavianus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Salve
Welcome back Quinte Sertori!.
I'm glad to hear from you again.
Habeas annum novum optimum
L. Pompeius Octavianus





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nathan Guiboche" <nate@m...> wrote:
>
> Salve All
>
> Good day to everyone,and a Happy New Year to all. I would like to
give my apologies to everyone in NR for my unexplained absence for
six months. All I can say is I had to leave quickly in order to
serve with the Canadian Armed Forces, and I can not say where. My
departure was very quickly done, and left no room to explain to
anyone what it was about, I had to accept and say nothing(even saying
this may backfire on me). I realize that I have let down a lot of
people, but I can say now I am here to stay! So please accept me
back to NR.
>
> Quintus Sertorius
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19120 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Le Thovey: a Roman mansio
G. Iulius Scaurus S. P. D.

Salvete, Quirites.

Here's a link to "Le Thovey: a Roman mansio":

http://www.sav.org/e/thovey.html

This site is a report on excavations conducted on a mansio in the
Roman town of Casuaria (parts of Faverges and the outlying hamlet of
Viuz, France).

Valete.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19121 From: nateguiboche Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: Return
Salve Lucius

It is good to hear from you again! South American NR has benefited
greatly from your efforts!

QS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Pompeius Octavianus"
<danielovi@c...> wrote:
> Salve
> Welcome back Quinte Sertori!.
> I'm glad to hear from you again.
> Habeas annum novum optimum
> L. Pompeius Octavianus
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nathan Guiboche" <nate@m...>
wrote:
> >
> > Salve All
> >
> > Good day to everyone,and a Happy New Year to all. I would like
to
> give my apologies to everyone in NR for my unexplained absence for
> six months. All I can say is I had to leave quickly in order to
> serve with the Canadian Armed Forces, and I can not say where. My
> departure was very quickly done, and left no room to explain to
> anyone what it was about, I had to accept and say nothing(even
saying
> this may backfire on me). I realize that I have let down a lot of
> people, but I can say now I am here to stay! So please accept me
> back to NR.
> >
> > Quintus Sertorius
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19122 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-01-02
Subject: Re: For Roman Literature Lovers
Salve

Where are these located on ebay?


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: Scriboni89@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] For Roman Literature Lovers


Salve,

That sounds very interesting. I have very limited works on any of those
authors. Would you mind sending me the sellers name etc? I am on e-bay a lot. I
am interested in purchasing.

BENE.VALE.
I.MANERE.IN.AMORA.DI.ROMA.
ET.FORTIS.IN.FIDE.
GNAEVS.SCRIBONIVS.SCRIPTOR.
DI.NOVA.ROMA.ET.LEGIO.XXIV.MA.
ET.LVDVS.MAGNVS.GLADIATORE.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19123 From: C. Iulius Iustinus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Descent from the Gods
Everyone knows that the Iulii were descendants of Venus through
Aeneas. Did any other gentes claim an descent from the Gods?

-- Iustinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19124 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Roman Revival
Salvete omnes,

Last night on my way to my project in the -40C barbarian wilderness,
I stopped at a hotel, watched a little TV and before dozing off, I
heard an article on CTV news. Apparently there is a great revival in
Roman and ancient history in Canada, the US and especially Great
Britain. They were showing some students visting Bath in England and
a few writers putting Roman themes into some of their modern stories
or films. This is indeed good news because one's general knowledge of
ancient history seems in part to be noticeably lacking since world
history has been dropped as a compulsory subject in quite a few
jurisdictions over the last 25 years. Perhaps there is yet light at
the end of the tunnel.

Regards.

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19125 From: Livia Cornelia Hibernia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Return
Salve Sertorius
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nathan Guiboche" <nate@m...> wrote:
>
> Salve All
>
> Good day to everyone,and a Happy New Year to all. I would like to
give my apologies to everyone in NR for my unexplained absence for
six months. All I can say is I had to leave quickly in order to
serve with the Canadian Armed Forces, and I can not say where. My
departure was very quickly done, and left no room to explain to
anyone what it was about, I had to accept and say nothing(even saying
this may backfire on me). I realize that I have let down a lot of
people, but I can say now I am here to stay! So please accept me
back to NR.
>
> Quintus Sertorius
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19126 From: Livia Cornelia Hibernia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Return
Salve Sertorius

Welcome back!
I'm sure whatever it was, Canada is safer for your service.
After all my years in US Military Intelligence, I got used to the
"..gotta go, can't say where, bye!" Kind of departures and the
equally sudden and unannounced reappearances.

Bene Vale
Livia Cornelia Hibernia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nathan Guiboche" <nate@m...> wrote:
>
> Salve All
>
> Good day to everyone,and a Happy New Year to all. I would like to
give my apologies to everyone in NR for my unexplained absence for
six months. All I can say is I had to leave quickly in order to
serve with the Canadian Armed Forces, and I can not say where. My
departure was very quickly done, and left no room to explain to
anyone what it was about, I had to accept and say nothing(even saying
this may backfire on me). I realize that I have let down a lot of
people, but I can say now I am here to stay! So please accept me
back to NR.
>
> Quintus Sertorius
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19127 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
SALVE D MORAVIA AVENTINA

>...I see that there is an
> opening for Quaestor that needs to be filled, I hereby declare my
>candidacy for Quaestor of Nova Roma.

Well, it's a pleasure for me to run for Quaestorship against an
experienced and dignified person as you are!

> I have been a citizen of Nova Roma since her infancy in 1999 and
> since then have served as a Scriba to now Censor Caeso Fabius and
> later went on to serve as Trbiune.

But let me know just one thing: why did you decide to make so many
steps back in your Cursus Honorum?!
I owe to a great family, but I'm quite new in Nova Roma, and I'm
starting my Cursus Honorum just now; it will be a great pleasure to
be elected as Quaestor, that is the reasonable first step for Cursus
Honorum, the historical and the NovaRoman one; I don't understand
how you could find the stimuli for doing your duty as it needs to be
done! Just Tribunus Plebis, almost consul, and now... Quaestor? I
don't understand!

>In 2755 I was appointed Priestess of Venus.

It looks harder for you: this could be a problem: Venus is my
Genitrix, my Gens belongs to Venus, and She never betraied Her Sons!


BENE VALE
L IUL SULLA
Candidate for Quaestorship
Italia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19128 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor a rebutal
In a message dated 1/2/04 5:40:33 PM Pacific Standard Time,
mcserapio@... writes:


> How is it now that you are presenting your candidacy as Quaestor?
> Are you acting against what you interpreted as the Will of Venus, or
> maybe you got another sign from Her which you interpreted in the
> opposite way?


Salvete

Actually, you bunch of jackals, it was at my suggestion that Diana Moravia
stands.
Equitius Marinus makes a good point about Moravia's lack of experience and I
felt this was a good opportunity for her to enter the Honorum. Diana Moravia
is a good person who wants to serve Rome. As for signs, if Venus doesn't want
her stand
the sign would be there. Not because of your interpetation Manius
Constantinus Serapio. Oh by the way what do you do for a living? Have you even had a
third of the experience that Diana Moravia has had dealing with money and
valuables?

I thought not. Yet here you were a Quaestor. Doesn't a equally qualified
person here have a chance?

People of Rome...I grow tired of elections being decided as popularity
contests in Rome. If you are popular that make you competent? No. Just makes you
popular. Tell me, is that what we have now, a high school student class
presidental contest? What's next, we crown the Consules at the spring prom?
See through this charade. Put people into positions of authority who are
qualified to handle that authority.



>
> Then, if Consulship is 'a poor consolation prize', what about
> Quaestorship?
>

What about the Quaestorship? If she wants to serve Rome and enter the
Honorum,
who are you to judge? When you stood for Quaestorship last year, did anybody
judge you as unfit? So she was disappointed when she lost. Gods,
Constantinus, are telling me you wouldn't be if lost a chance to serve Rome by a vote?


> Last but not least (and I think this will be the part you will like
> less, I am sorry), the recent discussion on the new law about the
> Comitia Centuriata voting system showed two things. The first one is
> that, sad to say, you were not able to make a calculation which was
> a bit more complicate than the one required by the previous system.
> The second one is that you voted for a law which proposed a voting
> system which you were not understanding, or you understood wrongly.
> That is not what I look for in a Quaestor

So vote against her. But that is just one vote of nay. She is not running
for Rogator and the last election demonstrated that you could manipulate that
system. Moravia is not going to be involved in vote counting.
I trust that the rest of the People seeing that she has major banking
experience, will take a different view.
You had your say. We all understand your position. You are not going to
vote for her.
Now leave her alone.

Valete

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19129 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Supporting Lucius Iulius Sulla Part I
In a message dated 1/2/04 6:56:30 PM Pacific Standard Time,
sacro_barese_impero@... writes:


> He's one of the most skilled and experienced new citizen of Nova Roma. I
> was
> very impressed when I started to work with him: he has passion, dedication,
> modesty and intelligence when he accomplish the hard jobs.
> I tested his skills when I organized the last Nova Roman Rally in Bologna.
> But first of all in Provincia Italia: he's contacting several famous italian
> roman experts receiving very good and interesting interviews for Nova Roma.
> It was an hard job because this experts are the èlite of the historical and
> archeological academical world in Europe.
>
Salvete
Really? I know a bunch of Famous Italian Roman experts myself as does G.
Iulius Scaurus...


Care to drop some names? I probably have their e-mail addresses.

Valete
Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19130 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
In a message dated 1/3/04 12:14:30 AM Pacific Standard Time,
21aprile@... writes:

Salvete
> >...I see that there is an
> > opening for Quaestor that needs to be filled, I hereby declare my
> >candidacy for Quaestor of Nova Roma.
>
> But let me know just one thing: why did you decide to make so many
> steps back in your Cursus Honorum?!
> I owe to a great family, but I'm quite new in Nova Roma, and I'm
> starting my Cursus Honorum just now; it will be a great pleasure to
> be elected as Quaestor, that is the reasonable first step for Cursus
> Honorum, the historical and the NovaRoman one; I don't understand
> how you could find the stimuli for doing your duty as it needs to be
> done! Just Tribunus Plebis, almost consul, and now... Quaestor? I
> don't understand!

Interesting, you should say that. Why are you standing? You are a new
citizen, and apparently Apulus' lap dog, so why would you want to enter the
Honorum? It because the Quaestorship was promised to you? That no one would stand
in your way? That is not going to happen. As you pointed out the Honorum this
is the lowest rung on public service, so I remind you that being a Tribune is
not part of the Cursus Honorum, so Diana Moravia is not stepping back, she
continues her political career. True she aimed high, yet
undaunted she continues forward. She followed my advice, but a lot of Romans
come to me for advice, especially about elections and public service.
Oh by the way, I was a Curule Aedile, then a Consul and then a Quaestor. I
never saw it as a step back. I only saw it as a chance to serve Rome.


> >In 2755 I was appointed Priestess of Venus.
> It looks harder for you: this could be a problem: Venus is my
> Genitrix, my Gens belongs to Venus, and She never betraied Her Sons!
>
Funny, I didn't get a single once of sincerity in that statement. Could you
be reading lines?
oh and it's "betrayed."

Valete
Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19131 From: TiAnO Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Witnessing the passing of Imperium
Salvete omnes,

The new year has started and one of the happy duties of a lictor has come again.

I, Tiberius Annaeus Otho, as a Lictor of Nova Roma and a member of the Comitia Curiata, hereby witness and acknowledge the passing of Imperium - the power to carry out elected duties and uphold the laws - to the duly elected Nova Roman magistrates for the year 2757 AUC.

As a Lictor of Nova Roma I also recognize Imperium for all prorogued and newly appointed Provincial Praetors of Nova Roma, and also recognize that Imperium which
may be bestowed upon those Provincial Praetors or appointed during the course
of the coming year."

May the Gods and the spirit of Roma Antiqua watch over the Magistrates of
Nova Roma, and grant them the guidance and wisdom to use their Imperium for
the positive furtherance of Romanitas. May this sacred bond bring favor upon
our Nation and our Citizens in this coming year.

Valete bene in pace deorum, TiAnO




Tiberius Annaeus Otho (TiAnO) Factio Praesina
Lictor curiatus
Translator linguae Germanicae
Paterfamilias gentis Annaearum
Praefectus scribarum regionis Germaniae Superioris
Tribunus laticlavius militum legionis XI CPF
Homepage: http://www.tiano.ch.tt


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19132 From: Franciscus Apulus Caesar Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Supporting Lucius Iulius Sulla Part I
Salve Maximus,

> Really? I know a bunch of Famous Italian Roman experts myself as
does G.
> Iulius Scaurus...
> Care to drop some names? I probably have their e-mail addresses.

Of course, it's a plesure for me soddisfy your request.
You can contact the following fampus italian experts talking about
Bernardo Cortese (the macronational name of Iulius Sulla):

- Prof. Giovanni Brizzi (University of Bologna, one of the most
important expert of military history of Ancient Rome. If you are an
expert, you should read a book by Brizzi)

- Prof. Mauro Ronzani (University of Pisa)

- Prof. Cesare Letta (University of Pisa, famous expert of
romanization of the italic populations and religious and
philosophical ideaologies of Ancient Rome)

- Dott.ssa Silvia Marini (University of Stockholm, she worked with
Dag Norberg in Paris)

- Prof. Franco Nicastro (University of Rome, expert of etruskian
culture and owner of the famous restaurant Magna Roma)

- Prof. Stefano Bruni (archeologist director of the ruins of the
port of Pisa)

There are other names but I think it's enough to soddisfy you.
Is it?
Maximus, usually I don't say uncorrect informations about a man.
When I say Iulius Sulla interviewed several italian experts for Nova
Roma, I sais a correct information. By the way, of course, you are
free to check...

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19133 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
AVE OPTIME C IVLI SCAVRE AEDILIS CVRVLIS

I am not the kind of person who keeps picking on the others. I wrote
what I wanted to say, and I will answer Diana Moravia's e-mails
should she wish to answer mine.
Should Diana Moravia tell me the same things you just wrote, then I
shall answer her.

BENE VALE
M'Con.Serapio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19134 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: The Will of Venus and a Pontiff
AVE Q FABI MAXIME

As I told to Aedilis Curulis C Iulius Scaurus, as to things
concerning Diana Moravia I shall reply to Diana Moravia herself only.
Should she tell me the same things you just wrote, I shall reply.

But here I see another point which worries me. You wrote:

> it was at my suggestion that Diana Moravia stands.

Then:

> As for signs, if Venus doesn't want her stand the sign would be
there.

According to the message by Diana Moravia I quoted in my first mail,
she *already* got a sign from Venus, and she, Her Sacerdos,
*already* interpreted it. You, a Pontiff!, you suggested her to act
against or to ignore that sign!
Please note I am not saying here Diana Moravia should not run
because of that sign. She can do whatever she wants. Here I am
worrying about your conduct as a man of the Religio Romana! A man of
the Religio Romana who induces another person to disobey a Divine
sign!
And given that Diana Moravia has been appointed Sacerdos Veneris by
the Collegium of Pontiffs, I suppose she is the most qualified
person in Nova Roma to interpret Venus' signs. Are you, Q Fabi,
telling me that she was wrong and that you know the right
interpretation? Or are you telling me, Q Fabi, that the political
career is more important than the Will of the Gods? Or, and this
would be the worst thing, are you meaning, Q Fabi, that the Goddess
Venus was wrong? That the Goddess Venus does not understand? That
the Goddess Venus can be cheated!?

Please, I beg you to prove all of this is wrong, as I could not bear
that in our Collegium there is a Pontiff like the one I am seeing.

OPTIME VALE
M'Con.Serapio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19135 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Manius Constantinus Serapio"
<mcserapio@y...> wrote:

> Last but not least (and I think this will be the part you will like
> less, I am sorry), the recent discussion on the new law about the
> Comitia Centuriata voting system showed two things. The first one is
> that, sad to say, you were not able to make a calculation which was
> a bit more complicate than the one required by the previous system.
> The second one is that you voted for a law which proposed a voting
> system which you were not understanding, or you understood wrongly.
> That is not what I look for in a Quaestor.
>
> If you wish to answer this mail, I would beg you to answer all of my
> points. Thank you!

Salve,

I wonder if publically calling people stupid is something one should
look for in a Consul? But that is a rhetorical question and neither
here nor there.

Judging from my email that I received during the course of the
election period and after, Diana was not alone with having questions
about the system. I didn't post several lengthy explanations of how
the Centuries were voting in turns because I was bored and had nothing
better to do.

Perhaps a few statistics that I shared with Consular Fortunatus would
be a little enlightening:

63.2% of the ballots cast were demeed valid
36.8% of the ballots cast were demeed invalid

85.3% of the invalid ballots were invalidated as having voted out of turn
7.3% of the invalid ballots were invalidated as duplicates
4.8% of the ballots were invalidated as having unknown voter codes
1.3% of the ballots were cast after voting close
1.3% of the ballots were cast after voting closed and was a duplicate

Of the invalid votes cast out of turn only 45.7% returned to revote at
the proper time.

If Diana is stupid for being confused by the voting system, then
you've just called a little over a 1/3 of Nova Roman voters too stupid
to vote at the proper time. As last year's Rogator having been
sitting behind the ballot box watching and having time to contemplate
everything, I believe that the current voting system in place in the
Comitia Centuriata and the Comitia Populi Tributa are nothing less
complete and utter disasters. The only thing that saved the voting in
the Comitia Populi Tributa is that in none of the contests were there
more candidates than there were positions open and there ws no
confusion on when to vote. The laws may have been promulgated with
good intentions, but good intentions are also the cobblestones on the
road to hell.

In the Comitia Plebis Tributa things went much smoother. The voting
system in the Lex Moravia which is so criticized by some as not being
"fair" uses the exact same mathematical concepts that the systems in
the Comitia Centuriata and Comitia Populi Tributa uses, but one does
not have to go through confusing reiterations of the same mathematical
concepts to arrive at the same result and at the same time the results
and how they are derived are easily understood by the people at large.

Diana Moravia Aventina came up with an election lex that is easily
understood, easily implemented by the Rogators, did not create a
nearly 40% ballot invalidation rate, and did not generate confusing
results.

She has listed her qualifications in the field of finance which are
stellar. Combining that with her experience as Tribuna, I'd say Diana
is more than qualified to be a Quaestor and since I'm no longer bound
by any ethical consideration to remain neutral about any candidate, I
whole heartedly endorse Diana Moravia Aventina for Quaestor.

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19136 From: Fr. Apulus Caesar Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Salve Maximus,

> Interesting, you should say that. Why are you standing? You are a new
> citizen, and apparently Apulus' lap dog,

Interesting comment, Senator. I don't know what are your collaborations with
your nova roman friends. Of course I like to have no "dogs" lapping me,
because I think it's offensive about the Dignitas of a citizen. Everyone
here is free to do what he wants and say that Iulius Sulla is a lap dog is
offensive.
Yes, I'm suppoting him and I'm proud to be a friend of Iulius Sulla. He
showed me what he could to do and I was impressed from him. I 'm sure he's
one of the best new candidates of NR.
And I have to say you that maybe the Provincia Italia is so big now because
usually we have friendly and free collaborations.
It seems you are not so close to this kind of friendships.

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19137 From: Fr. Apulus Caesar Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Digest Number 1049
Salve Maximus,

Message: 10
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 03:36:35 EST
From: QFabiusMaxmi@...
Subject: Re: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor a rebutal

In a message dated 1/2/04 5:40:33 PM Pacific Standard Time,
mcserapio@... writes:


> How is it now that you are presenting your candidacy as Quaestor?
> Are you acting against what you interpreted as the Will of Venus, or
> maybe you got another sign from Her which you interpreted in the
> opposite way?


Salvete

Actually, you bunch of jackals, it was at my suggestion that Diana Moravia
stands.
Equitius Marinus makes a good point about Moravia's lack of experience and I
felt this was a good opportunity for her to enter the Honorum. Diana
Moravia
is a good person who wants to serve Rome. As for signs, if Venus doesn't
want
her stand
the sign would be there. Not because of your interpetation Manius
Constantinus Serapio. Oh by the way what do you do for a living?

> Have you even had a
> third of the experience that Diana Moravia has had dealing with money and
> valuables?
> I thought not.
> Yet here you were a Quaestor. Doesn't a equally qualified
> person here have a chance?

As past Magistrate I must to say that Manius Constantinus Serapio was a
wonderful Quaestor, the most qualified. And in sevaral events like the
creation of the Aedilician Fund and the organization of the Nova Roman Rally
he gave me the impression of perfect experince and skills dealing with
money.
Please, Senator, don't judge too if you're not able to do it.

> People of Rome...I grow tired of elections being decided as popularity
> contests in Rome. If you are popular that make you competent? No. Just
makes you
> popular. Tell me, is that what we have now, a high school student class
> presidental contest? What's next, we crown the Consules at the spring
prom?
> See through this charade. Put people into positions of authority who are
> qualified to handle that authority.

Maximus, so you are saying me that citizen mustn't to be eleceted for
popularity. But Diana is more famous and popular of Iulius Sulla and she
will be elected for his popularity of course. If you agree with your
opinions, you should vote for Iulius Sulla, a not famous but skilled
citizens qualified to be Magistrate.

About the skills Iulius Sulla, I know only that for the Project of Magna
Mater he could help well Marcus Iulius Perusianus. One reason is because he
knows several experts and he showed us that he able create useful
collaborations with universities and academical istitutions.

> > Then, if Consulship is 'a poor consolation prize', what about
> > Quaestorship?

> What about the Quaestorship? If she wants to serve Rome and enter the
> Honorum,
> who are you to judge? When you stood for Quaestorship last year, did
anybody
> judge you as unfit? So she was disappointed when she lost. Gods,
> Constantinus, are telling me you wouldn't be if lost a chance to serve
Rome by a vote?

Maximus, maybe you didn't understood what Serapio said. I think he means
that if the Consulship is a poor consolation, the Quaestorship is NOTHING
for Diana. This important in my opinion because it means Diana will be not
aimed to serve as Quaestor as well as possible if she'll consider her job
less than a "poor consolation prize".

> So vote against her. But that is just one vote of nay.

Please add my vote, I'll vote for Iulius Sulla.
Diana, please don't be hurted or disappointed but I know well Iulius Sulla,
I'm a friend of Sulla and I would like to see him as Magistrate because I
think he's one of the man of the nova roman future.

> She is not running
> for Rogator and the last election demonstrated that you could manipulate
that
> system. Moravia is not going to be involved in vote counting.

Senator Maximus, what you're saying? Do you mean that our Rogatores could be
corrupted or they manipulated the elections? Do you means that someone could
be so aimed to manipulate our elections?
Do you know that this are important statements?

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19138 From: L. Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: The Will of Venus and a Pontiff
Excuse Me,
Could you kindly leave the Religio out of the political debate?

L. Sicinius Drusus
Pontifex

Manius Constantinus Serapio wrote:

> AVE Q FABI MAXIME
>
> As I told to Aedilis Curulis C Iulius Scaurus, as to things
> concerning Diana Moravia I shall reply to Diana Moravia herself only.
> Should she tell me the same things you just wrote, I shall reply.
>
> But here I see another point which worries me. You wrote:
>
> > it was at my suggestion that Diana Moravia stands.
>
> Then:
>
> > As for signs, if Venus doesn't want her stand the sign would be
> there.
>
> According to the message by Diana Moravia I quoted in my first mail,
> she *already* got a sign from Venus, and she, Her Sacerdos,
> *already* interpreted it. You, a Pontiff!, you suggested her to act
> against or to ignore that sign!
> Please note I am not saying here Diana Moravia should not run
> because of that sign. She can do whatever she wants. Here I am
> worrying about your conduct as a man of the Religio Romana! A man of
> the Religio Romana who induces another person to disobey a Divine
> sign!
> And given that Diana Moravia has been appointed Sacerdos Veneris by
> the Collegium of Pontiffs, I suppose she is the most qualified
> person in Nova Roma to interpret Venus' signs. Are you, Q Fabi,
> telling me that she was wrong and that you know the right
> interpretation? Or are you telling me, Q Fabi, that the political
> career is more important than the Will of the Gods? Or, and this
> would be the worst thing, are you meaning, Q Fabi, that the Goddess
> Venus was wrong? That the Goddess Venus does not understand? That
> the Goddess Venus can be cheated!?
>
> Please, I beg you to prove all of this is wrong, as I could not bear
> that in our Collegium there is a Pontiff like the one I am seeing.
>
> OPTIME VALE
> M'Con.Serapio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19139 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: The Will of Venus and a Pontiff
Gaius Modius Athanasius Manio Constantinio Serapio SPD

I have to say, without a shadow of a doubt, that your post -- quoted below -- is one of the worst attempts at using the Religio Romana and the actions of our priests for your own political gain -- or perhaps for the political gain of your patron?

As a citizen of Nova Roma Diana Moravia has every right to serve our Republic and stand for office. Additionally, as a Sacerdoes she does not answer to you. She answers to Venus, and also to the Collegium Pontificum. You have no right to interpret signs from Venus, and you have no right in telling a Pontifex what his duties are to the Religio -- let alone telling him how to interpret signs from a Goddess.

Neither Diana, nor Quintus Fabius need "PROVE" anything to you. If she wants to stand for office then she will stand for office.

This double standard is wearing thin with me. When Consul Marinus ran for office, it was brought up that he said he would not stand for an office in 2004. His response was, "I changed my mind." I can accept the honesty in this, and I can respect it too. I was considering running for Plebian Aedile instead of Tribune, and told a few people in private that I was going to take that route. I changed my mind. So if you are going to attack Diana in this public forum then by your same logic you need to attack everyone who "changes" their mind, or takes a different course of action.

Additionally, if you are going to continue to attack Diana for her choice to run for Quaestor, then you will also have to start attacking me as well.

Furthermore, now that you are in the business of interpreting the will of the Gods I would suggest that you apply to the Collegium Pontificum to become an Augur. Nova Roma could use the talents of those individuals capable of interpreting the Will of the Gods.

Gaius Modius Athanasius
Tribune of the Plebs
Flamen Pomonalis

In a message dated 1/3/2004 9:22:13 AM Eastern Standard Time, mcserapio@... writes:

> According to the message by Diana Moravia I quoted in my first mail,
> she *already* got a sign from Venus, and she, Her Sacerdos,
> *already* interpreted it. You, a Pontiff!, you suggested her to act
> against or to ignore that sign!
> Please note I am not saying here Diana Moravia should not run
> because of that sign. She can do whatever she wants. Here I am
> worrying about your conduct as a man of the Religio Romana! A man of
> the Religio Romana who induces another person to disobey a Divine
> sign!
> And given that Diana Moravia has been appointed Sacerdos Veneris by
> the Collegium of Pontiffs, I suppose she is the most qualified
> person in Nova Roma to interpret Venus' signs. Are you, Q Fabi,
> telling me that she was wrong and that you know the right
> interpretation? Or are you telling me, Q Fabi, that the political
> career is more important than the Will of the Gods? Or, and this
> would be the worst thing, are you meaning, Q Fabi, that the Goddess
> Venus was wrong? That the Goddess Venus does not understand? That
> the Goddess Venus can be cheated!?
>
> Please, I beg you to prove all of this is wrong, as I could not bear
> that in our Collegium there is a Pontiff like the one I am
> seeing.
>
> OPTIME VALE
> M'Con.Serapio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19140 From: nateguiboche Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Return
Salve Livia

Thank you for understanding what it is that I was dealing with. I
will be back for good now, and hope to return to my duties in Canada
Occidentalis, whatever NR decides what they are to be.

Vale

Quintus Sertorius


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Livia Cornelia Hibernia"
<livia_cornelia_hibernia@c...> wrote:
> Salve Sertorius
>
> Welcome back!
> I'm sure whatever it was, Canada is safer for your service.
> After all my years in US Military Intelligence, I got used to the
> "..gotta go, can't say where, bye!" Kind of departures and the
> equally sudden and unannounced reappearances.
>
> Bene Vale
> Livia Cornelia Hibernia
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nathan Guiboche" <nate@m...>
wrote:
> >
> > Salve All
> >
> > Good day to everyone,and a Happy New Year to all. I would like
to
> give my apologies to everyone in NR for my unexplained absence for
> six months. All I can say is I had to leave quickly in order to
> serve with the Canadian Armed Forces, and I can not say where. My
> departure was very quickly done, and left no room to explain to
> anyone what it was about, I had to accept and say nothing(even
saying
> this may backfire on me). I realize that I have let down a lot of
> people, but I can say now I am here to stay! So please accept me
> back to NR.
> >
> > Quintus Sertorius
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19141 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Fr. Apulus;

What does this mean? Are you insinuating that other Provinces somehow charge for events? This is not the case within the Great Province of Lacus Magni.

And when you say "usually we have friendly and free collaborations," is it safe to assume that from time to time you also have "hostile and costly collaborations" as well?

Your insult of Quintus Fabius, a provincial governer himself (ie., Proconsul), is unfounded. I have heard of no impropriety within his Provincial administration.

Gaius Modius Athanasius


In a message dated 1/3/2004 9:11:18 AM Eastern Standard Time, sacro_barese_impero@... writes:

> And I have to say you that maybe the Provincia Italia is so
> big now because
> usually we have friendly and free collaborations.
> It seems you are not so close to this kind of friendships.
>
> Vale
> Fr. Apulus Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19142 From: Gaia Fabia Livia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
> What does this mean? Are you insinuating that other Provinces somehow
> charge for events? This is not the case within the Great Province of
> Lacus Magni.

I cannot speak for Caesar, but I understood from his message that he did
not mean free in a monetary sense, but in its (earlier) meaning of without
restraints or conditions attached. In other words, that he can have
friends and that they need not be "lap dogs".

In fact it seems to be the case - having just checked all the dictionaries
I have to hand - that the meaning of "free" which involves not costing
anything is not even featured in the dictionaries (at least British ones)!
So I think we can excuse an Italian for not realising that it is the most
widely used meaning :)

I apologise to Caesar if I have misinterpreted his words, and to everyone
else if you believe I am speaking out of turn in trying, but I understand
that when misunderstandings occur, the quicker they are sorted out, the
better, in most cases!

Livia

P.S. For those who are interested, the word "free" in fact comes - in the
first instance - from an old word for "love." I suspect this is
irrelevant to the matter at hand, but I offer it as a piece of trivia,
which I hope will interest some of you!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19143 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor a rebutal
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 03:36:35AM -0500, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
> In a message dated 1/2/04 5:40:33 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> mcserapio@... writes:
>
> > How is it now that you are presenting your candidacy as Quaestor?
> > Are you acting against what you interpreted as the Will of Venus, or
> > maybe you got another sign from Her which you interpreted in the
> > opposite way?
>
> Salvete
>
> Actually, you bunch of jackals, it was at my suggestion that Diana Moravia
> stands.

Which "bunch of jackals" are you referring to, Quinte? Do you actually
have enough sand to name some names, or are you just throwing mud around
in random directions and then running and hiding? Several people have
voiced concerns - I share at least one of them myself, the one about
Diana seemingly contradicting her revelation from Venus - that I saw as
valid and deserving of an answer; your attack is totally unprovoked.

I understand and honor the concept of being a graceful winner and not
crowing or pointing fingers, and this is what those who have won this
election have adhered to, in my perception. However, you and the rest of
your tame crowd of losers have worn out any grace and forebearance that
you were granted *due to your status as losers*. I think that many will
agree when I say that there's been far more than enough of your sniping
and insults.


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Videant consules ne quid detrimenti capiat respublica.
May the consuls see to that no damage comes to the state.
-- Phrase that gave the Roman consuls absolute power when the state was in a severe
crisis. Quoted by Cicero in In Catilinam.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19144 From: Stefn_Ullarsson Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Standing for Rogator
Salvete Omnes,

Having given due consideration to the notion, and seeing the need of an
important office being filled...

I contacted the Consuls and am now making a public statement.

I, Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus, stand before you all as a
candidate for the office of Rogator.

My main qualifications are basic math ability, computer literacy and a
long term interest in the health and growth of Nova Roma.

I served as Quaestor for 3 terms and was a Legate in my home Province of
Lacus Magni. I founded and still run (with as much running as it
needs) the Sodalis pro Coqueror et Coquus (108 members on the e-list).

I was not very active the last year, but things look to be turning
around and I do wish to more actively help again.

Though I am a followers of the Folkway of my Northern Ancestors, I have
no clash of conscience in giving Honor and Respect to the Religio or the
Holy Ones paid Worship thereby. These Holy Powers are, in my mind,
cousins germane to my own Holy Ones, and as such, are greeted as distant
Kin.

- - -
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.

In amicus sub fidelis
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Lictor pro Nova Roma
Cives et Paterfamilias
Religio Septentrionalis et Poet

Living a worthy life need not be complicated at all.
Honor the Holy Powers in word and deed.
Honor your Family and Forebears.
Give heed to knowledge and skill.
Attempt to do that which is Right;
with Wisdom, Generosity and Personal Honor.
Read, Write, Love, Laugh, Hate, Cry, Cook, Build,
Sit quietly with family enjoying the birds flying by;
just be the best of that for which you are capable as a Man.
Remember that everything you do adds to the weight of your Past,
for Good or Ill. - Venii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19145 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
AVE OPTIME Q CASSI CALVE

While I thank you for those interesting statistics, let me just
point out that there is a large difference between understanding a
system on paper and putting it into effect. Your post was
concentrated on the second case, while mine was on the first one.

BENE VALE
M'Con.Serapio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19146 From: Gaia Fabia Livia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Q. Cassius Calvus wrote:

> 85.3% of the invalid ballots were invalidated as having voted out of
> turn
> 7.3% of the invalid ballots were invalidated as duplicates
> 4.8% of the ballots were invalidated as having unknown voter codes 1.3%
> of the ballots were cast after voting close
> 1.3% of the ballots were cast after voting closed and was a duplicate
>
> Of the invalid votes cast out of turn only 45.7% returned to revote at
> the proper time.
>
> If Diana is stupid for being confused by the voting system, then
> you've just called a little over a 1/3 of Nova Roman voters too stupid
> to vote at the proper time.

As some will doubtless recall, I was (and am) in favour of the new Fabian
electoral system. I know I can do the mathematics of it, because I spent
hours working on the very many different voting procedures which we
*could* have had, and trying to work out which I would support and which I
would not. But I was still responsible for one of those ballots
invalidated for voting out of turn, because on the day when voting opened
I forgot about the sequential aspect. (I did, however, return to vote
later when it was my turn.)

If anyone wishes to propose a change to remove the sequential aspect,
while it would be a move away from historicity, I cannot say I would put
up much of a fight (though I expect there would be opposition from other
quarters). But it was only the sequential voting which was responsible
for these - admittedly quite worrying - statistics which we have just been
presented with.

If attempts are made to change the methods by which votes are calculated,
I can tell you now that I will be fighting for as long as there is breath
left in me.

This is *absolutely not* about Diana Moravia Aventina's candidateship for
Quaestor - I support her in this in the spirit in which she does it. She
cannot serve our republic as Consul this year and so she offers to serve
it in what way she can. We need another Quaestor, and we should all be
thankful that we have candidates putting themselves forwards. This is not
about that.

However, I must say that, *according to my view of what an electoral
system is for*, the system we have in the Comitia Centuriata produces
fairer results than the Moravian system currently in place in the Comitia
Plebis Tributa. I realise that, as a patrician, I am not affected by this
law, and so I have not commented on it earlier. But I cannot keep quiet
when an ex-rogator tells us that it "uses the exact same mathematical
concepts" as the Fabian system, because it does not. As I understand it -
and someone please correct me if I'm wrong - the Moravian system is based
on plurality. The Fabian system is based on majority. I can think of no
more fundamental difference.

I understand when people say we can't talk of objective fairness, so I
will not. All I will say is that there are a variety of approaches which
it is possible to take, and which one any given person considers fair will
be based on their view of what electoral systems are for, and what
principles they should be based on. I am happy to discuss my views on
this with anyone who cares to debate it; I acknowledge that my views may
not be unilaterally accepted and this does not worry me. But I think it
is important to separate the ideological debate (on which I will say what
I think) from the efficiency debate (on which I will state the facts). If
the people of Nova Roma wish to work out what principles they,
collectively, accept, then I would be prepared to put together a proposal
for an electoral system which works using *those* principles (even if they
are not the ones I privately believe in). I cannot say I would support
it, but I would draft the necessary lex, and if it takes long enough that
I'm Consul(!) then I would also present it to the people. This is called
belief in democracy :)

I am prepared for certain people to turn around in response to this
message and say that I write it as a "client" of Caeso Fabius
Quintilianus. To those who spent much of last year singing that tune, I
will say only that my contract of employment with him terminated three
days ago, so even what you could in fairness have said then, you cannot
say now. Since Quaestors haven't even been assigned to their magistrates
yet, I currently speak for myself and myself only, and am responsible only
to the electorate which elected me.

And one more parting note - this time last year, everyone was in agreement
that the priority was to eliminate run-off elections. Both the Fabian and
Moravian systems succeeded in this, and for that we should be grateful.
It means we don't have to wait months to fill all the vacancies before we
can start work on this year's tasks, whether or not those involve further
electoral reform.

Gaia Fabia Livia
Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19147 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: The Will of Venus and a Pontiff
AVE C MODI ATHANASI

Believe me when I say that this topic, which I distinguished from
the previous one by using a different subject line, has nothing to
do with the political side. I shall be glad to move this religious
discussion to the Religio list, or to any other list which is deemed
more appropriate, so that it will be clear that I am not using the
Religio as a political mean. And, BTW, I apologize for giving this
impression.

I will wait for a reply in order to know where I can discuss this
matter which seriously worries me.
Should I get no reply, I will answer your mail on the Religio list.

OPTIME VALE
M'Con.Serapio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19148 From: Lucius Pompeius Octavianus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: email problem
Salvete omnes.
If someone sent me an email between last night and now, please send
it again. I've been having some technical difficulties, and it seems
that some emails have been deleted.
Thank you in advance
Lucius Pompeius Octavianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19149 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Esteemed (much less now) Quintus Fabius Maximus

> Interesting, you should say that. Why are you standing? You are a
new
> citizen, and apparently Apulus' lap dog,

A good rule of thumb for a wise man would be to inform himself about
something before speaking his mind about that, a rule apparently you do
not seem to follow. To define anyone as someone's lap dog is
gratuitously offensive and doesn't speak well of the offender, don't you
think?

Anyway, the fact that many already spoke in favour of Sulla is not a
sign of him being the lap dog of anyone, but simply a show of the spirit
and activism that animates the provincia Italia (a spirit and activism
that, among the rest, brought to the foundation -or re-foundation- of
the Urbs within Nova Roma) and that is in good part a merit to credit to
Franciscus Apulus himself. It is a sign of the appreciation that Sulla
earned within the Provincia, an appreciation genuine that brings even an
old, usually quiet over the international lists, citizen like me to
speak out of indignation at your crude, gratuitous comment.

Within the Provincia, Sulla has done a load of concrete, appreciated
work, sometimes in collaboration with Franciscus Apulus (as unavoidable
being Franciscus Apulus the propraetor of the Provincia), and if that
makes him a lap dog, I wish the Provincia Italia would be a larger
doghouse and be more prolific.

Refrain, good Quintus Fabius Maximus, from such comments, your dignitas
will surely benefit from it.

Vale Bene

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
Pater of the Gens Constantinia
Aediles ad Interim of Urbs Roma

----
http://village.flashnet.it/~ua01823/

"INTPs are about 1% of the general population, making this one of the
rarest of types"... bad for us, but probably good for the world! :)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19150 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Standing for Rogator
Salvete Quirites; et salve, Ulleri Venator.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Stefn_Ullarsson
<catamount_grange@i...> wrote:
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> Having given due consideration to the notion, and seeing the need
> of an important office being filled...
>
> I contacted the Consuls and am now making a public statement.
>
> I, Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus, stand before you all as
> a candidate for the office of Rogator.

I have not received your declaration (perhaps there was some
technical problem somewhere), but I am accepting this public
declaration anyway. Your name will be included in the ballot.

Thank you for volunteering for this important position.

S.V.B.E.E.V.
CN.SALIX.T.F.A.NEP.OVF.ASTVR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19151 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Salve Honorable Q. Cassius Calvus, Amice!

May I just ask one question or two? As we are not in a contio period
about these issues, I just want to ask questions and not to debate,
which mean that I am not trying to make a point at the moment.

>Salve,
>

.......................
..........................

>Judging from my email that I received during the course of the
>election period and after, Diana was not alone with having questions
>about the system. I didn't post several lengthy explanations of how
>the Centuries were voting in turns because I was bored and had nothing
>better to do.

The lex was built on two parts, the historical one trying to find a
historical formula as close to Roma Antiqua as possible and the
alternative voting system to avoid the run-offs that had nearly
"killed" elections in the years before (at least as I remember it).

>Perhaps a few statistics that I shared with Consular Fortunatus would
>be a little enlightening:

This is new to me, but very interesting.

>63.2% of the ballots cast were demeed valid
>36.8% of the ballots cast were demeed invalid
>
>85.3% of the invalid ballots were invalidated as having voted out of turn

Does this mean that it seemed to be hard to understand/remember
_when_ (part of the historical system) a citizens should vote?

> 7.3% of the invalid ballots were invalidated as duplicates
> 4.8% of the ballots were invalidated as having unknown voter codes
> 1.3% of the ballots were cast after voting close
> 1.3% of the ballots were cast after voting closed and was a duplicate

These figures are really interesting (once again I have not seen them
before). If there were many that voted, any % could be alarming, but
if 1% is only one or two persons the figures does say that much as I
see it. So my next question is how many voted? Is there any of these
(the four figures above) that for sure could be blamed on the
Alternative voting system?

I also would like to ask if it be possible to get these figures in
number of voters instead of %, as it is easier to see what the %
repesents in that way?

>Of the invalid votes cast out of turn only 45.7% returned to revote at
>the proper time.

This seem to be about difficulties with the "voting in turns" (the
historical system), is that correct?
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19152 From: Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: oath of office
I, Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia (Laura Pelton Sweet), do hereby
solemnly swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in
the best interests of its citizens and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia , swear
to honor the gods and goddesses of Roma in my public dealings, and to
pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia , swear to uphold and defend the
Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to
act in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia , swear to protect and defend the
Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia , further swear to fulfill the
obligations and responsibilities of the office of Quaestor to the
best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the
gods and goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor,
do I accept the position of Quaestor and all the rights, privileges,
obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19153 From: Gnaeus Salix Astur Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Our new candidates
Salvete Quirites.

I would like to express my own opinion about the recent discussion
about our new candidates, if you don't mind.

First of all, I would like to thank them all for volunteering to work
for our Res Publica for (let's remember it onw more time) *no* money
and *no* tangible benefits but the pleasure of having cooperated in
the construction of something that is worth the effort (if any of you
has changed his or her mind, let me know ;-) ).

I would also like to remind the supporters of each candidate that it
is much better to stress the qualities of your favourite candidate
than to throw mud to the other candidate's face (and I am saying this
to *everyone*). Not only it is much nicer for everyone involved; it
is also far more effective (I have seen a few Novoroman elections
thus far, so that conclusion comes from experience).

I am not one of the praetores anymore, but I think that it was the
moment to remind you all of all those obvious thoughts we all tend to
forget when we get nervous :-).

S.V.B.E.E.V.
CN.SALIX.T.F.A.NEP.OVF.ASTVR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19154 From: L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Request to the Praetors
Salvete omnes

I have a few humble quotations to do to our elected Praetors, according to the guideline:

Senator Fabius Maximus said to Iulius Sulla <oh and it's "betrayed."> about the wrong writting of such word in Iulius Sulla's message. I want to remember that, being not a native speaker, Senator Fabius Maximus could have followed that of "Sometimes a person makes a genuine mistake, and your gentle correction via private email means much more to them than potentially
embarrassing them in the forum over what is an innocent error". But of course there could be a question about if writting "thier" instead of "their" is not also a mistake that so many times our Senator committed against his mother tongue, english. . :-)

On the other hand, about that of "Apulus' lap dog" and "you bunch of jackals" and the general tone of his messages, he should follow that of:

"Please consider the following when expressing disagreement of opposing
viewpoints:

* Express respect for the person and the entitlement to his opinion,
and faith in his or her good intentions.

* At all times maintain politeness in the expression of your opinion
and endeavour to respect the rights and opinions of others.

Inappropriate behaviour includes:

misrepresentation of the truth for the purpose of making another person look foolish;

I guess that calling a citizen "Apulus' lap dog" is a sort of violation of such appropiate behaviour, although we know all that our Senator enjoys bad entitleling those he dislike with cocky manners.

calling others names"

Of course, I guess that being part of a "bunch of jackals" is not the real name of Iulius Sulla, so this is also another thing to point out.


He, that is my feeling, should have follow that of:

"VI. If you feel that a post is inappropriate in any way, consider
mailing the individual concerned privately, explaining your rationale
for grievance and asking for clarification"

Senator Fabius Maximus, I ask you to think about and to the elected Praetores to think about. Is not a strong suggestion, but a humble number of quotations. It seems that we can't respect each other, and this is not a very good will to build. Hopefully, I think this will change this year.

Oh, by the way, I see quite well that of Moravia Aventina running for Quaestor. I do believe that she want's to imply herself in Nova Roma and therefore I support her for that, although I can vote for her or Iulius Sulla. And about the religious implications nothing I can say, because this is a subject in which I feel myself not as an expert but as a single citizen who have his own opinion. Good luck, Moravia Aventina and Iulius Sulla, and may Gods leave this Forum from the plague of indignity insults, or more specifically, from the poor resource of the "Ad hominem" argument.


vale bene in pace deorum,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19155 From: Gnaeus Octavius Noricus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Request to the Praetors
L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS wrote:
> I have a few humble quotations to do to our elected Praetors,
> according to the guideline:

The request has been received and will be dealt with off list.

I'd like to invite all sides to prove their good will by keeping the further debate as civil as possible.

--
Optime valete!
Gnaeus Octavius Noricus
Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19156 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: The Will of Venus and a Pontiff
Serapio:

At least three Pontifices and one Flamen are aware of these discussions. The Collegium Pontificum is aware of your concerns. If the Collegium deems these concerns to warrent action trust that one will be taken. Otherwise, I would suggest you cease making references to the political motivations of a sacerdos.

Therefore, my reply is that you drop this line of discussion.

Vale;

Gaius Modius Athanasius
Flamen Pomonalis

In a message dated 1/3/2004 11:48:38 AM Eastern Standard Time, mcserapio@... writes:

> I will wait for a reply in order to know where I can discuss this
> matter which seriously worries me.
> Should I get no reply, I will answer your mail on the
> Religio list.
>
> OPTIME VALE
> M'Con.Serapio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19157 From: Stefn_Ullarsson Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Standing for Rogator
Avete,

My thanks to G. Salix Astur and G. Equitius Marinus, our Honored Consuls
for having acknowledged and accepted my candidacy for Rogator.

My campaign pledge is short: if elected, I shall do the job as
accurately as is humanly possible.

In amicus sub Fidelis - Venator, candidate for Rogator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19158 From: jmath669642reng@webtv.net Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Investment Of Imperium
I, Marcus Minucius Audens, as a lictor of Nova Roma and a member o the
Comitia Curiata hereby witness and acknowledge the passing of Imperium -
the power to carry out elective duties and uphold the laws of Nova Roma
- to the duly elected Nova Roman Magistrates for the year 2757 AUC.

As a Lictor of Nova Roma, I also recognize Imperium for all prorogued
and newly appointed Provincial Praetors of Nova Roma, and further
recognize that Imperium which may be bestowed upon those Provincia
Praetors or appointed Provincial Officers during the course of the
coming year.

May the Spirit of Roma Antiqua watch over the Magistrates of Nova Roma
and grat them the guidance, wisdom, common sense, and patience to use
thier Imperium for the ppositive furtherence of Romanitas. May this
sacred bond bring favor upon our nation and ur citizens in the coming
year.

Respectfully Submitted;

Marcus Minucius Audens



Respectfully;

Marcus Minucius Audens

Wishing you Fair Winds and Following Seas!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19159 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: The Will of Venus and a Pontiff
AVE C MODI ATHANASI

I will consider your message to mean that I will receive an answer,
either private or public, from the Collegium Pontificum on the
matter.
Thank you.

OPTIME VALE
M'Con.Serapio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19160 From: rory12001 Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: The Will of Venus and a Pontiff
Additionally, as a Sacerdoes she does not answer to you. She
answers to Venus, and also to the Collegium Pontificum. You have no
right to interpret signs from Venus, and you have no right in telling
a Pontifex what his duties are to the Religio -- let alone telling
him how to interpret signs from a Goddess.
> Salvete Quirites;
Manius Constantine has as a civis voiced his opinion, and now Gaius
Modius voices his opinion that we must not mix politics and the
Religio in NR of all the absurdities, meanwhile signing his name with
his religious office.
I quote J Schied p.20:
"It follows that there was a religious aspect to every communal
action and a communal aspect to every religious action. In this sense
the Roman religion could be said to be a political relgion.
It was a religion under no particular authority or leader, even
at the level of the public cult. Religious authority was always
shared."

All the priests, pontifeces, flamines are just citizens they are
not a heiarchy that is unanswerable to anyone. I ask our cives to
read John Scheid's "Roman Religion" and fully understand the Religio.

As to Serapio's discussing the 'sign'
John Scheid p. 119
" At the end of the Republic, in the course of the sonflicts that
divided the various factions struggling for supremacy, the auspices
were the focus of intense controversy. It was now as much a matter of
denoucingthe illegitamacy of your opponents and proclaiming
legitimacy conferred on yourself as of emphasizing tht you were
yourself the only person qualified to actualise the support that the
gods offered the Romans. In just half a century, the auspices had
been transformed from a guarantee of public liberty into a component
of personal power."

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioBookGroup/

Cives, understand and protect the liberty that is ours.
vale Pomponia Fabia Vera
civis


>
>
>

>
> Gaius Modius Athanasius
> Tribune of the Plebs
> Flamen Pomonalis
>
> In a message dated 1/3/2004 9:22:13 AM Eastern Standard Time,
mcserapio@y... writes:
>
> > According to the message by Diana Moravia I quoted in my first
mail,
> > she *already* got a sign from Venus, and she, Her Sacerdos,
> > *already* interpreted it. You, a Pontiff!, you suggested her to
act
> > against or to ignore that sign!
> > Please note I am not saying here Diana Moravia should not run
> > because of that sign. She can do whatever she wants. Here I am
> > worrying about your conduct as a man of the Religio Romana! A man
of
> > the Religio Romana who induces another person to disobey a Divine
> > sign!
> > And given that Diana Moravia has been appointed Sacerdos Veneris
by
> > the Collegium of Pontiffs, I suppose she is the most qualified
> > person in Nova Roma to interpret Venus' signs. Are you, Q Fabi,
> > telling me that she was wrong and that you know the right
> > interpretation? Or are you telling me, Q Fabi, that the political
> > career is more important than the Will of the Gods? Or, and this
> > would be the worst thing, are you meaning, Q Fabi, that the
Goddess
> > Venus was wrong? That the Goddess Venus does not understand? That
> > the Goddess Venus can be cheated!?
> >
> > Please, I beg you to prove all of this is wrong, as I could not
bear
> > that in our Collegium there is a Pontiff like the one I am
> > seeing.
> >
> > OPTIME VALE
> > M'Con.Serapio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19161 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: The Will of Venus and a Pontiff Part I
In a message dated 1/3/04 6:23:44 AM Pacific Standard Time,
mcserapio@... writes:
> She can do whatever she wants. Here I am
> worrying about your conduct as a man of the Religio Romana! A man of
> the Religio Romana who induces another person to disobey a Divine
> sign!
> And given that Diana Moravia has been appointed Sacerdos Veneris by
> the Collegium of Pontiffs, I suppose she is the most qualified
> person in Nova Roma to interpret Venus' signs. Are you, Q Fabi,
> telling me that she was wrong and that you know the right
> interpretation? Or are you telling me, Q Fabi, that the political
> career is more important than the Will of the Gods? Or, and this
> would be the worst thing, are you meaning, Q Fabi, that the Goddess
> Venus was wrong? That the Goddess Venus does not understand? That
> the Goddess Venus can be cheated!?
>
>

Salvete!

This is funny. I don't mean Ha Ha funny. I mean seriously funny. You are
attacking me?
Boy, I must have struck a nerve. The only time you guys attack anybody is
when we are close to the truth. I thought I made it clear to you.

Moravia might have thought she lost due to the divine will of the gods. She
actually lost because some people manipulated the voting system, by refusing
to vote for everybody qualified. I explained that to her. That's clever
politics, true, but not the will of the Gods.
When the other elected Quaestor withdrew I saw that as another chance given
to her. Perhaps even by the Gods. It certainly was a portent. So I am not
defying the Gods. No, I'm defying a bunch of manipulators. Moravia has decided
to enter the Honorum. This bothers you. I can see why. But don't try and
pin this on Moravia defying the Gods. If anything, the Immortals might like
the idea of Moravia as Quaestor. Did you ever think of that? If the Gods gave
her this opportunity, should she not take it?

You weren't part of Aedile conspiracy last year to deny the will of both Rome
and Gods by declaring the virtual Ludi bloodless, are you?

Valete

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19162 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
--- QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote: > In a message dated
1/3/04 12:14:30 AM Pacific
> Standard Time,
> 21aprile@... writes:
>
> Salvete
> > >...I see that there is an
> > > opening for Quaestor that needs to be filled, I
> hereby declare my
> > >candidacy for Quaestor of Nova Roma.
> >
> > But let me know just one thing: why did you decide
> to make so many
> > steps back in your Cursus Honorum?!
> > I owe to a great family, but I'm quite new in Nova
> Roma, and I'm
> > starting my Cursus Honorum just now; it will be a
> great pleasure to
> > be elected as Quaestor, that is the reasonable
> first step for Cursus
> > Honorum, the historical and the NovaRoman one; I
> don't understand
> > how you could find the stimuli for doing your duty
> as it needs to be
> > done! Just Tribunus Plebis, almost consul, and
> now... Quaestor? I
> > don't understand!
>
> Interesting, you should say that. Why are you
> standing? You are a new
> citizen, and apparently Apulus' lap dog, so why
> would you want to enter the
> Honorum? It because the Quaestorship was promised
> to you? That no one would stand
> in your way? That is not going to happen. As you
> pointed out the Honorum this
> is the lowest rung on public service, so I remind
> you that being a Tribune is
> not part of the Cursus Honorum, so Diana Moravia is
> not stepping back, she
> continues her political career. True she aimed
> high, yet
> undaunted she continues forward. She followed my
> advice, but a lot of Romans
> come to me for advice, especially about elections
> and public service.
> Oh by the way, I was a Curule Aedile, then a Consul
> and then a Quaestor. I
> never saw it as a step back. I only saw it as a
> chance to serve Rome.
>
>
> > >In 2755 I was appointed Priestess of Venus.
> > It looks harder for you: this could be a problem:
> Venus is my
> > Genitrix, my Gens belongs to Venus, and She never
> betraied Her Sons!
> >
> Funny, I didn't get a single once of sincerity in
> that statement. Could you
> be reading lines?
> oh and it's "betrayed."
>
> Valete
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19163 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Standing for Rogator
The best of luck to you Stephanus Ullerius !

And may Odin, Frig, Freyr and Freya bless you in this endeavor to serve our Republic!

Vale,
Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19164 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: The Tribunate and the cursus (WAS: Declaration of candidacy for Qua
A. Apollonius Cordus to Senator, Consular & Pontiff Q.
Fabius Maximus and all citizens and peregrines,
greetings.

I hope you're well; I'm a bit fluish, but in fairly
good spirits.

Apologies for accidentally sending a dud message just
now, by the way.

I'm interested in something you said:

> ... As you
> pointed out the Honorum this
> is the lowest rung on public service, so I remind
> you that being a Tribune is
> not part of the Cursus Honorum, so Diana Moravia is
> not stepping back, she
> continues her political career.

I understood that the tribunate could sometimes be an
alternative to an aedileship during the republic - am
I wrong?

Naturally this has no bearing on the matter of Moravia
Aventina's candidacy, on which I have no desire to
cast aspertions. It's an academic question.

________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19165 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor a rebutal
In a message dated 1/3/04 8:08:16 AM Pacific Standard Time, ben@...
writes:


> Which "bunch of jackals" are you referring to, Quinte? Do you actually
> have enough sand to name some names, or are you just throwing mud around
> in random directions and then running and hiding? Several people have
> voiced concerns - I share at least one of them myself, the one about
> Diana seemingly contradicting her revelation from Venus - that I saw as
> valid and deserving of an answer; your attack is totally unprovoked.
>
>
Salvete!
First off, I never run and hide. And anytime you want to confront me, you
know where to find me. Second, Diana Moravia is more then qualified for the
post. You know this, so the best you could come up with, since you don't like
her, is A. she is too dumb for the post because she complained about the voting
system. Hades 30% of Rome didn't understand the voting system. Are they dumb
as well?
B. Oh she's defying the will of gods apparently by her own admission. Not
only is that a cheap shot by bringing in the Religio into a political debate,
but the circumstances has changed. A Quaestor cannot carry out the duties and
withdrew. Could this not be a sign that Moravia should stand for the slot. I
have no idea, unlike you, but is it not possible?

As for you all being cowardly animals, sorry, I just don't see you as
Wolves.

Valete!

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19166 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Salve Q. Cassius Calvus

Thank you for another eye-opening look at our election system . It need to be fixed and soon.

As to the contest for Quaestor I took note of two things, when Diana announced her candidacy. She listed her impressive qualifications and stated her willingness to serve Nova Roma and not once did she mention her opponents or attack them.

As one of last years Quaestors and a citizen who votes

Its very simple, if you want my vote tell be why I should vote FOR you and not why I should vote AGAINST your opponent.


Now as to Endorsements for Quaestor let's see I supported a Candidate for Consul and then suggested she be appointed to the Senate and now she stand for Quaestor.


I think I will be voting for Diana Moravia Aventina

Vale
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Citizen









[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19167 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor Part II
In a message dated 1/3/04 9:20:05 AM Pacific Standard Time,
domcosfus@... writes:


> Within the Provincia, Sulla has done a load of concrete, appreciated
> work, sometimes in collaboration with Franciscus Apulus (as unavoidable
> being Franciscus Apulus the propraetor of the Provincia), and if that
> makes him a lap dog, I wish the Provincia Italia would be a larger
> doghouse and be more prolific.
>
>
Salvete
I thought the snide implication that Moravia was too dumb to understand the
voting system so she had no right to stand for Quaestor was very good and very
well delivered.
So I returned the favor. Sheesh. I'm good with myself, I don't need your
valadation. But thanks for diminishing my esteem. I'll go now and fall on my
gladius. If this is a RPG as so many of you believe, you are falling far short
of acting very Roman.

Valete
Q. Fabius Maximus



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19168 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Electoral systems (WAS: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor)
A. Apollonius Cordus to Q. Cassius Calvus and all
citizens and peregrines, greetings.

I hope you're well; I'm still a bit under the weather.

Just to get the topical bit out of the way: I don't
suggest that anyone who doesn't understand the Fabian
electoral system is stupid by any means. Nor do I
consider an understanding of that system a necessary
qualification for a quaestorship. Nor have I any wish
to suggest that Moravia Aventina doesn't understand
it, except that I can't see why she considers it
unfair if she does. But all this is by the by.

Your statistics - for which many thanks - show that
many voters had problems with the sequential aspect of
the system. This isn't a great surprise to me, but of
course it is disappointing and ought to be addressed.

I can think of three possible solutions:

1. Do nothing and hope that people will get the hang
of it.
2. Remove the sequential element entirely.
3. Keep the system as it is now, but, rather than
consider premature votes invalid, merely set them on
one side and count them later with the rest.

I'll explain option 3 a little better:

The centuria praerogativa would still vote first, and
then the rest of the first class, and then everyone.
At present, any vote cast prematurely is invalid and
the voter must vote again at the right time. This
could be changed so that if any vote was cast
prematurely the rogators would not invalidate it but
would just keep it back and count it along with the
rest of the votes from the same voting group. Thus no
one who voted at the wrong time would have to vote
again.

Of course, people who were to vote early would miss
the opportunity to consider the results of the
centuria praerogative and the first class when
deciding how to vote; but I suspect not many people do
this anyway, and it would probably be better than
options 1 or 2. I'd be interested to hear what others
think.

Now, as for your further comments:

> ... I believe that the current voting system
> in place in the
> Comitia Centuriata and the Comitia Populi Tributa
> are nothing less
> complete and utter disasters. The only thing that
> saved the voting in
> the Comitia Populi Tributa is that in none of the
> contests were there
> more candidates than there were positions open and
> there ws no
> confusion on when to vote.

Naturally I take your comments seriously, but I can
only think that you've made a mistake of typing or of
understanding. You say "the only thing that saved the
voting in the Comitia Populi Tributa is that... there
were more candidates than there were positions... and
there was no confusion on when to vote". It sounds as
though you think the lack of sequential voting was a
result of the elections being unopposed, which of
course is not the case. Did you mean to say "the only
things... are that..."? If so, that would make more
sense, but I'm still not clear what you would mean.

> In the Comitia Plebis Tributa things went much
> smoother. The voting
> system in the Lex Moravia which is so criticized by
> some as not being
> "fair" uses the exact same mathematical concepts
> that the systems in
> the Comitia Centuriata and Comitia Populi Tributa
> uses, but one does
> not have to go through confusing reiterations of the
> same mathematical
> concepts to arrive at the same result and at the
> same time the results
> and how they are derived are easily understood by
> the people at large.

If by "uses the exact same mathematical concepts" you
mean that both systems use the idea of one number
being greater than another, that's perfectly true.
Beyond that, the mathematical differences between the
two systems could hardly be greater. The Fabian system
is based on the idea that a candidate must win 50% of
the centuries or tribes in order to win. The Moravian
has no minimum number of tribes to be won. The systems
are entirely different.

> Diana Moravia Aventina came up with an election lex
> that is easily
> understood, easily implemented by the Rogators, did
> not create a
> nearly 40% ballot invalidation rate, and did not
> generate confusing
> results.

All this is entirely correct. One might also mention
that this easily understood, easily implemented system
is one which could easily result in the election of a
candidate who is supported by tiny minorities and who
is strongly opposed by large majorities.

Some things are simple, others are complicated. The
constitutions of democratic Athens and Nazi Germany
were simple; the constitutions of the Roman republic
and the United States of America were complicated. The
bodies of bacteria and viruses are simple; the bodies
of humans and elephants are complicated. Saying "if
it's confusing it must be bad" is simple; considering
a thing on its merits may be complicated.

If what we want is an electoral system that everyone
can understand, then let's have everyone elected by
lottery. If we want an electoral system that is fair
and efficient, then let's talk about whether the
current system is fair and efficient and not about
whether it's complicated.

________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19169 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Salve Manius Constantinus,

Sorry for having to wait a few hours for a reply. I was sleeping off a virtual hangover that I got
in the Taverna.

<Believe me when I say I think you are one of the most pleasant
<people here in Nova Roma. I just hope you will not feel hurted by my
<words in this message (even though I fear you will!).

The Gods have blessed me with strength of character as well as a sense of humour. So ask away!

<>My Goddess has chosen to keep me specifically for herself and
<>that makes the Consulship a poor consolation prize!

<Then you added:

<>I also made an offering to Venus Victrix and without explanation,
<>one of the candles popped in a very loud way. I understood this to
<>mean that Venus would have me lose so that I could focus on the
<>Religio this year, which has always been my first love.

<How is it now that you are presenting your candidacy as Quaestor?
<Are you acting against what you interpreted as the Will of Venus, or
<maybe you got another sign from Her which you interpreted in the
<opposite way?

A sign? Yes. Acting against Her? No.

During the last year, being Priestess of Venus came second place to my Tribuneship. That was the
first time in my life that my spirituality and religious studies took second place.

The Tribuneship took me about 3 hours per day since I actually read *all* of the mainlist emails,
CPT emails, Senate list and as well as answering all emails that I received publicly or privately.
The Consulship being a similar job as Tribune (writing laws, calling for elections, having the
people look to you for guidance, needing to know what is going on in our Republic at all times)
would be a similar amount of hours to do the job well.

I used to balance 4 billion dollars within 8 hours each day, that comes to 8,333,333,33 dollars
per minute. Considering that NR could only have a maximum treasury of 4800 (2000 citizens paying
the maximum of 12 dollars taxes each year) I think that you don't need to be a math whiz to figure
out that this small amount would be done by me in seconds :-) That leaves plenty of time left for
the Gods.

I think the position of Quaestor would take up a minimal of time as compared to last year. And it
is the Gods who give me the courage to keep serving our Republic in any way that I can. Venus
Genetrix is the Mother of the Roman people. In announcing my candidacy for Quaestor, I honor Her
further while not having any time taken from what I should be dedicating to Her.

<Then, if Consulship is 'a poor consolation prize', what about
<Quaestorship?

See above.

<Last but not least (and I think this will be the part you will like
<less, I am sorry), the recent discussion on the new law about the
<Comitia Centuriata voting system showed two things. The first one is
<that, sad to say, you were not able to make a calculation which was
<a bit more complicate than the one required by the previous system.

LOL! I'm sure that you forgot a smiley face or three in there! Either that or that is the most
polite way I've ever seen of someone writing 'your too stupid to add 2 plus 2. Since you said
above that don't want to hurt my feelings I'm sure that it's the former. But since I can't be sure
that you did not mean the latter, see above-- not only can I add and subtract I can even multiply
and divide.

<The second one is that you voted for a law which proposed a voting
<system which you were not understanding, or you understood wrongly.
<That is not what I look for in a Quaestor.

I understood completely but I did not like what I saw when we went live. I took the word of Gnaeus
Marinus (who coincidentally is both the person who tested the system and the person who has
benefited from it) that it was accurate. On hindsight, I should have done a test election myself,
and not voted in support of it.

<If you wish to answer this mail, I would beg you to answer all of my
<points. Thank you!

I always answer my emails dear. Have I ever not?

Vale,
Diana Moravia
Sacerdos Veneris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19170 From: Brandon Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Concerning the censorship of A. Claudius (for the scholars)
Salve,

Quod agitis? I realize that we are in the middle of another election
but I have been doing my normal leisure reading of Titus Livy and
have gotten to the censorship of Appius Claudius and I am puzzled.
According to the Lex Aemilia a censor was confined to one and a half
years as censor then must resign. However, like his ancestors he was
was very brazen and refused to do so stating that he would serve for
the original five years before the Lex was passed and would do so
alone. My question is even though all but three Tribunes vetoed this
idea he still kept the censorship and niether the Senate or the
Consuls did anything. Both Consuls, Quintus Fabius and Gaius
Marcius, were at war with the Etruscans but could they not have
nominated a dictator, which they frequently did for various reasons,
to handle this situation as it was a direct violation of the law?
Not to mention the fact that A. Claudius had allowed the Potitian
gens to train slaves to administer the sacrifice to Hercules. Seems
to me that something could have been done. PLease pardon any
ignorance if any I am looking over and obvious solution.
Gratias, Brandon (hoping to be citizen soon)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19171 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
A. Apollonius Cordus to Priestess Diana Moravia
Aventina and all citizens and peregrines, greetings.

I hope you're well; I'm not too bad.

You say of the Fabian electoral system:

> On
> hindsight, I should have done a test election
> myself,
> and not voted in support of it.

Interestingly, this is what I and some of my then
colleagues strongly encouraged everyone to do. Sadly
no one seemed interested in testing the system for
themselves, though several people demanded that we
test it for them.

________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19172 From: Brandon Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Concerning the censorship of A. Claudius (for the scholars)
Pardon the lack of information concerning this. Livy dates this to
around 310 BC and it is found in Book IX of Livy's history.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19173 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: The Tribunate and the cursus (WAS: Declaration of candidacy f...
In a message dated 1/3/04 12:30:33 PM Pacific Standard Time,
a_apollonius_cordus@... writes:


> understood that the tribunate could sometimes be an
> alternative to an aedileship during the republic - am
> I wrong?
>
Salvete
That was true, when the Aedileship was open to Plebeians, the Tribunate
became a none magistracy. I'll have to reread my Mommsen and give you a more
definitive answer as dates et al..
Hope you feel better. A lot of that illness is going around.
Valete
Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19174 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Concerning the censorship of A. Claudius (for the scholars)
In a message dated 1/3/04 1:21:55 PM Pacific Standard Time,
cagneyfan@... writes:


> According to the Lex Aemilia a censor was confined to one and a half
> years as censor then must resign. However, like his ancestors he was
> was very brazen and refused to do so stating that he would serve for
> the original five years before the Lex was passed and would do so
> alone. My question is even though all but three Tribunes vetoed this
> idea he still kept the censorship and niether the Senate or the
> Consuls did anything.

Well, the Senate likely held a division which the result was to allow
Claudius to retain the Censorship. There was a war under way remember? Most of the
Republic's manpower was mobilized since there was two Consular armies in the
field. Aemilius never grandfathered the lex, so by strict interpretation
Claudius was correct. He should not have defied the Tribunes even if he was in the
right. Livius however portrays these Tribunes as scared of Claudius and his
lictors, so they were unwilling to do much. It was the times in Rome that
allowed Claudius to get away with this.

Both Consuls, Quintus Fabius and Gaius > Marcius, were at war with the
> Etruscans but could they not have nominated a dictator, which they frequently did
> for various reasons, to handle this situation as it was a direct violation of
> the law?
> Not to mention the fact that A. Claudius had allowed the Potitian
> gens to train slaves to administer the sacrifice to Hercules. Seems
> to me that something could have been done. Please pardon any
> ignorance if any I am looking over and obvious solution.


I see nothing wrong with slaves taught to serve a demi-god.


Valete
Q. Fabius Maximus



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19175 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quaestor II
Salve Iulius,

<Well, it's a pleasure for me to run for Quaestorship against an
<experienced and dignified person as you are!

Why thank you dear.

<But let me know just one thing: why did you decide to make so many
<steps back in your Cursus Honorum?!

I don't consider serving Nova Roma in any capacity to be a step backward.

<I owe to a great family, but I'm quite new in Nova Roma, and I'm
<starting my Cursus Honorum just now;

Lucky you! Your Materfamilias is a sweetie.

<it will be a great pleasure to
<be elected as Quaestor,

As it should be whenever serving our Republic in any capacity.

<I don't understand
<how you could find the stimuli for doing your duty as it needs to be
<done! Just Tribunus Plebis, almost consul, and now... Quaestor? I
<don't understand!

Your question is a rephrasing of your question above so I'll give you a rephrased reply:

I would volunteer to be the virtual toilet cleaner in the Taverna if it were seriously needed.
Yes, I lost the consulship and yes I am not being admitted to the Senate, and yes I am a former
Tribune, but there is a Quaestor needed to handle *real* money. I'm more than qualified to do the
job and so I volunteered. I realize that you are new, but the idea is serving where needed and not
having the character of "I won't do this" or "that" because it is beneath my level.

<It looks harder for you: this could be a problem: Venus is my
<Genitrix, my Gens belongs to Venus, and She never betraied Her Sons!

I'm sorry that you see this as a competition of Venus' Chosen Ones. You may win, I may win. But if
you lose, follow my lead and don't be discouraged and do like I have done and will continue to do:
volunteer to serve our Republic whenever there is some work that needs to be done that you know
that you are capable of doing.

Vale,
Diana Moravia
Sacerdos Veneris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19176 From: Brandon Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Concerning the censorship of A. Claudius (for the scholars)
The way it is worded by Livy it seems as though it is was. If I
remember correctly it was that gens' family honor so to speak if not
duty to perform this themselves. Just as the many gens in NR have
patron gods whom they honor as well as the Fabii, again if I
remember correctly, when the Gauls had invaded the Forum Romanum a
Fabii prepared his sacrifice, walked down from the Citidel and
performed it; unless I am comparing apples to oranges. Valete

> I see nothing wrong with slaves taught to serve a demi-god.
>
>
> Valete
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19177 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quaestor II
Diana Moravia wrote:

[a lot, but I'm only commenting on this one item]

> I don't consider serving Nova Roma in any capacity to be a step backward.

I completely agree with Diana in this. I feel sure she would execute the
duties of any office she were elected to with skill. There is no duty
in our Republic which is minor, or unimportant.

A personal comment for all who are questioning Diana's decision: Please,
let's give each other the benefit of the doubt and presume good faith.
I feel sure Diana is acting in good faith, and I wish her and all candidates
a clean and fair election.

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19178 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quaestor II
Thanks Marinus!

<A personal comment for all who are questioning Diana's decision: Please,
<let's give each other the benefit of the doubt and presume good faith.
<I feel sure Diana is acting in good faith, and I wish her and all candidates
<a clean and fair election.

I'll stop by the Taverna tomorrow to say hi once I recover from all that Jose Cuervo :-)

Vale,
Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19179 From: rory12001 Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Diana Moravia
<sacerdosveneris@y...> wrote:
> Salve Manius Constantinus,
>
> Sorry for having to wait a few hours for a reply. I was sleeping
off a virtual hangover that I got
> in the Taverna.
>
> Salve Diana Moravia;
why this talk of 'virtual' do you consider this a role-playing game?

You did not seem to understand the results of the election at all,
you wanted a recount then you had grave difficulty understanding that
it benefitted Marinus to come in second in more centuries than
yourself coming first . I believe you mentioned 'Gore" as if you had
been deprived of a rightful victory.
Finally if you wish to converse on the ML I would suggest you
respect Serapio & refer to him as civis or in a more dignifed manner
than 'sweetie' or'dear'. We are Nova Romans, how you conduct yourself
over at the Back Alley is of course your own concern.
vale Pomponia Fabia Vera

>
> I understood completely but I did not like what I saw when we went
live. I took the word of Gnaeus
> Marinus (who coincidentally is both the person who tested the
system and the person who has
> benefited from it) that it was accurate. On hindsight, I should
have done a test election myself,
> and not voted in support of it.
>
> <If you wish to answer this mail, I would beg you to answer all of
my
> <points. Thank you!
>
> I always answer my emails dear. Have I ever not?
>
> Vale,
> Diana Moravia
> Sacerdos Veneris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19180 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Nova-Roma] Endorsement for Stephanus Ullerius Ventor
Salvete
St. Ullerius was my Consular Quaestor. And he did an excellent job. He will
do the same as Rogator.
Valete
Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19181 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Salve Gaia Fabia Livia,

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaia Fabia Livia" <livia@s...> wrote:

> As some will doubtless recall, I was (and am) in favour of the new
Fabian
> electoral system. I know I can do the mathematics of it, because I
spent
> hours working on the very many different voting procedures which we
> *could* have had, and trying to work out which I would support and
which I
> would not. But I was still responsible for one of those ballots
> invalidated for voting out of turn, because on the day when voting
opened
> I forgot about the sequential aspect. (I did, however, return to vote
> later when it was my turn.)

> If anyone wishes to propose a change to remove the sequential aspect,
> while it would be a move away from historicity, I cannot say I would put
> up much of a fight (though I expect there would be opposition from other
> quarters). But it was only the sequential voting which was responsible
> for these - admittedly quite worrying - statistics which we have
just been
> presented with.

I don't believe that moving away from the partial historical
sequential voting procedure is actually needed. Better communication
and perhaps a software tweek that looks at the voter's century and the
date/time to either allow the ballot to be cast if the voter is in the
proper century or returns a message of what time that century may vote
if it is not, would go a long way to taking care of that problem.
Some people might not return to the Cista to vote again later but at
least they will have been warned and not go on their merry way
thinking they cast a valid ballot when in reality they did not.

> If attempts are made to change the methods by which votes are
calculated,
> I can tell you now that I will be fighting for as long as there is
breath
> left in me.

This is where we disagree to an extent. I can live with the system as
is, but I believe that it is fatally flawed as it is discriminatory
against some voters. I'll explain that in a little bit.

>
> This is *absolutely not* about Diana Moravia Aventina's
candidateship for
> Quaestor - I support her in this in the spirit in which she does it.
She
> cannot serve our republic as Consul this year and so she offers to serve
> it in what way she can. We need another Quaestor, and we should all be
> thankful that we have candidates putting themselves forwards. This
is not
> about that.

At least we agree on something. <G>

>
> However, I must say that, *according to my view of what an electoral
> system is for*, the system we have in the Comitia Centuriata produces
> fairer results than the Moravian system currently in place in the
Comitia
> Plebis Tributa. I realise that, as a patrician, I am not affected
by this
> law, and so I have not commented on it earlier. But I cannot keep quiet
> when an ex-rogator tells us that it "uses the exact same mathematical
> concepts" as the Fabian system, because it does not. As I
understand it -
> and someone please correct me if I'm wrong - the Moravian system is
based
> on plurality. The Fabian system is based on majority. I can think
of no
> more fundamental difference.


As I said, I'd address this issue later in this missive, and so I
shall. <G>

As an ex-rogator that has actually had to perform the duties required
under both systems I think I am far more qualified to state which is
better and more fair since I've seen both systems in actual real life
use not just as mere theories on a piece of paper.

The Fabian system is based on neither on majority or plurality of
votes, but on discrimination of votes. The Fabian system effectively
allows some centuries/tribes to cast multiple votes while some
centuries/tribes get to cast only one vote.

For example in the recent election Consul Salix was elected with 28
centuries. No controversy there. BUT those 28 then got to
effectively cast a SECOND whole new ballot in the second round where
as the other 21 centuries that didn't vote for Consul Salix in the
first round only got to cast the same exact ballot as in the first
round. The politically correct term for this system of voting is
called "preferential voting" in reality it is discimination voting
because if your political unit doesn't vote "the right way" on the
first round, your unit doesn't really get to cast a second ballot it
just gets to cast the same one again.

The Fabian system works fine if there is only one position to be
filled as on the first round someone is either elected or the lowest
polling candidate is dropped and so on round after round until a
candidate is elected. That's pretty fair and not unreasonable.
Except for the Censorship and the occasional vacancy, in Nova Roman
elections the people are not voting for a single candidate to fill a
single position, they are voting for multiple candidates to fill
multiple positions as all offices are collegial in nature. The Fabian
system does not take that into account. In the Fabian system some
political units get to vote twice (or more) to fill two (or more)
positions whereas other political units get to vote once to fill two
(or more) positions.

As to your objection to majority/plurality a majority is generally
considered the standard requirement as single candidate must meet in
order to be elected in a from a single slate of candidates to fill a
single position. However in the case of single slate of candidates to
fill multiple positions, a plurality is generally considered the
standard needed for election. The fatal flaw within the Lex Fabia is
it takes a standard for a single position election and applies it to a
multiposition election and in the process allows one set of voting
units to cast a ballot of their first choice, second choice, third
choice ect and another set only gets to cast one ballot and in effect
nullifing that sets second place, third place, ect choice for
candidates to fill more than one position.

In the Moravian system each Tribe casts an equal number of ballots as
their are positions to be filled, no set of tribal second place, third
place, ect choices are ignored in favor of another tribes' set because
they didn't vote the "right candidate."

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19182 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: The Will of Venus and a Pontiff Part I
AVE Q FABI

As I told C Modius Athanasius, I will not keep discussing on the
religious matter on this list, in order to avoid people to think I
am using the Religio as a political mean.
If you agree, we can move the religious discussion to the Religio
list.

BENE VALE
M'Con.Serapio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19183 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Electoral systems (WAS: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor)
Salve,

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@y...> wrote:
> A. Apollonius Cordus to Q. Cassius Calvus and all
> citizens and peregrines, greetings.
>
> I hope you're well; I'm still a bit under the weather.

Thank you for your enquiry into my health and I hope you feel better
soon. Too much holidy cheer? <G>

> Just to get the topical bit out of the way: I don't
> suggest that anyone who doesn't understand the Fabian
> electoral system is stupid by any means. Nor do I
> consider an understanding of that system a necessary
> qualification for a quaestorship. Nor have I any wish
> to suggest that Moravia Aventina doesn't understand
> it, except that I can't see why she considers it
> unfair if she does. But all this is by the by.
>
> Your statistics - for which many thanks - show that
> many voters had problems with the sequential aspect of
> the system. This isn't a great surprise to me, but of
> course it is disappointing and ought to be addressed.
>
> I can think of three possible solutions:
>
> 1. Do nothing and hope that people will get the hang
> of it.
> 2. Remove the sequential element entirely.
> 3. Keep the system as it is now, but, rather than
> consider premature votes invalid, merely set them on
> one side and count them later with the rest.
>
> I'll explain option 3 a little better:
>
> The centuria praerogativa would still vote first, and
> then the rest of the first class, and then everyone.
> At present, any vote cast prematurely is invalid and
> the voter must vote again at the right time. This
> could be changed so that if any vote was cast
> prematurely the rogators would not invalidate it but
> would just keep it back and count it along with the
> rest of the votes from the same voting group. Thus no
> one who voted at the wrong time would have to vote
> again.

While that is an interesting suggestion with #3, it does pretty much
defeat the purpose of the sequential voting system in the first place.
I think a software tweek to either allow a valid vote to be cast or
return a message stating that the voter's particular century needs to
wait until such and such a time to vote would go a long way to solving
the problem. I wouldn't shed to many tears if the whole sequential
voting system were scrapped as having been tried but really didn't
work as intended.


> Now, as for your further comments:
>
> > ... I believe that the current voting system
> > in place in the
> > Comitia Centuriata and the Comitia Populi Tributa
> > are nothing less
> > complete and utter disasters. The only thing that
> > saved the voting in
> > the Comitia Populi Tributa is that in none of the
> > contests were there
> > more candidates than there were positions open and
> > there ws no
> > confusion on when to vote.
>
> Naturally I take your comments seriously, but I can
> only think that you've made a mistake of typing or of
> understanding. You say "the only thing that saved the
> voting in the Comitia Populi Tributa is that... there
> were more candidates than there were positions... and
> there was no confusion on when to vote". It sounds as
> though you think the lack of sequential voting was a
> result of the elections being unopposed, which of
> course is not the case. Did you mean to say "the only
> things... are that..."? If so, that would make more
> sense, but I'm still not clear what you would mean.

You are correct, "things," it was a typo.

> > In the Comitia Plebis Tributa things went much
> > smoother. The voting
> > system in the Lex Moravia which is so criticized by
> > some as not being
> > "fair" uses the exact same mathematical concepts
> > that the systems in
> > the Comitia Centuriata and Comitia Populi Tributa
> > uses, but one does
> > not have to go through confusing reiterations of the
> > same mathematical
> > concepts to arrive at the same result and at the
> > same time the results
> > and how they are derived are easily understood by
> > the people at large.
>
> If by "uses the exact same mathematical concepts" you
> mean that both systems use the idea of one number
> being greater than another, that's perfectly true.
> Beyond that, the mathematical differences between the
> two systems could hardly be greater. The Fabian system
> is based on the idea that a candidate must win 50% of
> the centuries or tribes in order to win. The Moravian
> has no minimum number of tribes to be won. The systems
> are entirely different.
>
> > Diana Moravia Aventina came up with an election lex
> > that is easily
> > understood, easily implemented by the Rogators, did
> > not create a
> > nearly 40% ballot invalidation rate, and did not
> > generate confusing
> > results.
>
> All this is entirely correct. One might also mention
> that this easily understood, easily implemented system
> is one which could easily result in the election of a
> candidate who is supported by tiny minorities and who
> is strongly opposed by large majorities.

Actually the opposite is true. In the Moravian system one has to be
in the top 5 candidates of each tribe and the top five of the all the
tribes to get elected, I fail to see how a "tiny minority" could win
an election under such conditions. However I can readily see how a
minority candidate could easily win election under the Fabian system.

As an ex-rogator that has actually had to perform the duties required
under both systems I think I am far more qualified to state which is
better and more fair since I've seen both systems in actual real life
use not just as mere theories on a piece of paper.

The Fabian system is based on neither on majority or plurality of
votes, but on discrimination of votes. The Fabian system effectively
allows some centuries/tribes to cast multiple votes while some
centuries/tribes get to cast only one vote.

For example in the recent election Consul Salix was elected with 28
centuries. No controversy there. BUT those 28 then got to
effectively cast a SECOND whole new ballot in the second round where
as the other 21 centuries that didn't vote for Consul Salix in the
first round only got to cast the same exact ballot as in the first
round. The politically correct term for this system of voting is
called "preferential voting" in reality it is discimination voting
because if your political unit doesn't vote "the right way" on the
first round, your unit doesn't really get to cast a second ballot it
just gets to cast the same one again.

The Fabian system works fine if there is only one position to be
filled as on the first round someone is either elected or the lowest
polling candidate is dropped and so on round after round until a
candidate is elected. That's pretty fair and not unreasonable.
Except for the Censorship and the occasional vacancy, in Nova Roman
elections the people are not voting for a single candidate to fill a
single position, they are voting for multiple candidates to fill
multiple positions as all offices are collegial in nature. The Fabian
system does not take that into account. In the Fabian system some
political units get to vote twice (or more) to fill two (or more)
positions whereas other political units get to vote once to fill two
(or more) positions.

As to your objection to majority/plurality a majority is generally
considered the standard requirement as single candidate must meet in
order to be elected in a from a single slate of candidates to fill a
single position. However in the case of single slate of candidates to
fill multiple positions, a plurality is generally considered the
standard needed for election. The fatal flaw within the Lex Fabia is
it takes a standard for a single position election and applies it to a
multiposition election and in the process allows one set of voting
units to cast a ballot of their first choice, second choice, third
choice ect and another set only gets to cast one ballot and in effect
nullifing that sets second place, third place, ect choice for
candidates to fill more than one position.

In the Moravian system each Tribe casts an equal number of ballots as
their are positions to be filled, no set of tribal second place, third
place, ect choices are ignored in favor of another tribes' set because
they didn't vote the "right candidate."

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19184 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: R: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor Part II
Vale

And once again, my senator, I'd suggest you to check your facts before
speaking about something :) For your own interest, I shall add

> If this is a RPG as so many of you believe, you are falling far
> short of acting very Roman "

You who? Personally, I so believe this to be a RPG that I'm among the
founders of the first RL community of Nova Roma. Think, before writing,
my good senator, again on the behalf of what little dignitas is left to
you.

Vale Bene

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
Pater of the Gens Constantinia
Aediles ad Interim of Urbs Roma

----
http://village.flashnet.it/~ua01823/

"INTPs are about 1% of the general population, making this one of the
rarest of types"... bad for us, but probably good for the world! :)


> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: QFabiusMaxmi@... [mailto:QFabiusMaxmi@...]
> Inviato: sabato 3 gennaio 2004 22.17
> A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Oggetto: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Part
> II
>
> In a message dated 1/3/04 9:20:05 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> domcosfus@... writes:
>
>
> > Within the Provincia, Sulla has done a load of concrete, appreciated
> > work, sometimes in collaboration with Franciscus Apulus (as
unavoidable
> > being Franciscus Apulus the propraetor of the Provincia), and if
that
> > makes him a lap dog, I wish the Provincia Italia would be a larger
> > doghouse and be more prolific.
> >
> >
> Salvete
> I thought the snide implication that Moravia was too dumb to
understand
> the
> voting system so she had no right to stand for Quaestor was very good
and
> very
> well delivered.
> So I returned the favor. Sheesh. I'm good with myself, I don't need
your
> valadation. But thanks for diminishing my esteem. I'll go now and
fall
> on my
> gladius. If this is a RPG as so many of you believe, you are falling
far
> short
> of acting very Roman.
>
> Valete
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19185 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Manius Constantinus Serapio"
<mcserapio@y...> wrote:
> AVE OPTIME Q CASSI CALVE
>
> While I thank you for those interesting statistics, let me just
> point out that there is a large difference between understanding a
> system on paper and putting it into effect. Your post was
> concentrated on the second case, while mine was on the first one.
>
> BENE VALE
> M'Con.Serapio

Salve,

Actually there is very little difference. If a system can not be
fully understood on paper then logically it is very unlikely that it
will work very well when put into effect. I have seen the effects and
logic dictates that it is not understood very well either in the order
of the sequential voting nor in how the results were tabulated. To
insinuate that any person is stupid because they didn't understand one
portion logically infers that anyone that didn't understand any
portion is equally as stupid. So I object to calling a whole bunch of
people stupid. Confused by new procedures, yes, but not stupid.

There were times I was getting confused during the process as to when
one phase end and another began and what exactly was the cut off
ballot for validity. When I first ran the results for the Consular
election I was momentarily confused as to how on earth did Marinus go
from 5 centuries to 25! I had to run the numbers again, and again,
and again until I saw what was happening and fully understood it. I
had a lapse into confusion does that make me stupid as well?

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19186 From: Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quaestor II
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Bill Gawne <gawne@c...> wrote:

> I completely agree with Diana in this. I feel sure she would
execute the
> duties of any office she were elected to with skill. There is no
duty
> in our Republic which is minor, or unimportant.

I'll add my agreement here as well. I know Diana to be a generous and
intelligent person, wholly dedicated to Nova Roma. I also appreciate
her and the other candidates' willingness to step in here.

Arnamentia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19187 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
AVE DIANA MORAVIA

> A sign? Yes. Acting against Her? No.

Ok, so you got a sign which you interpreted in a certain way, then
you got a second one which you interpreted in the opposite way.
Therefore I deduce that Venus changed Her minds, which to me is
perfectly possible.
Ok, thank you very much for clarifying.

> <Then, if Consulship is 'a poor consolation prize', what about
> <Quaestorship?

I see that this point has been misunderstood. It is surely my fault.
I meant: "If you think that Consulship is a mere consolation prize,
how do you consider Quaestorship?", i.e. do you think it is less
than nothing?
But do not bother answering this point. That is obviosly a
rhetorical question which would get a foreseeable answer ;-)

> I understood completely but I did not like what I saw when we went
live. I took the word of Gnaeus
> Marinus (who coincidentally is both the person who tested the
system and the person who has
> benefited from it) that it was accurate. On hindsight, I should
have done a test election myself,
> and not voted in support of it.

Apart from a not-that-veiled allusion which is not my duty to
comment, I must apologize for guessing you did not understand the
voting system. You would have had the means to understand it, but
you did not do a test election yourself (as, BTW, was suggested you
to do more than once) and voted for it all the same.

BENE VALE
M'Con.Serapio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19188 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Request to the Praetors
Salve, Praetor

Thank you very much, indeed. I join in your request to all cives.

vale,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Octavius Noricus
<cn.octavius.noricus@g...> wrote:
> L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS wrote:
> > I have a few humble quotations to do to our elected Praetors,
> > according to the guideline:
>
> The request has been received and will be dealt with off list.
>
> I'd like to invite all sides to prove their good will by keeping
the further debate as civil as possible.
>
> --
> Optime valete!
> Gnaeus Octavius Noricus
> Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19189 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
AVE OPTIME Q CASSI CALVE

> Actually there is very little difference.

I must disagree. One thing is considering a system on the paper.
Another thing is putting it into effect.
In fact, when considering the system on the paper you can fully
understand it, including the sequential aspect. However, when
putting it into effect you have to check what your Centuria is, look
for a message telling you when you can vote, how much you have to
wait, etc. This can create confusion, of course, but you see it is
created by the amount of actions one has to do, not by considering
the system on the paper. ;-)

BENE VALE
M'Con.Serapio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19190 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: ad diem III Nonae Ianuarii
G. Iulius Scaurus S. P. D.

Salvete, Quirites.

Today is ante diem III Nonae Ianuarii; the day is comitialis.

Tomorrow is pridie Nonae Ianuarii; the day is comitialis.

Valete.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Aedilis Curulis, Flamen Quirinalis et Pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19191 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Salve Amice,

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
<christer.edling@t...> wrote:
> Salve Honorable Q. Cassius Calvus, Amice!
>
> May I just ask one question or two? As we are not in a contio period
> about these issues, I just want to ask questions and not to debate,
> which mean that I am not trying to make a point at the moment.

It's really hard to debate numbers, they either are or aren't. <G>

> The lex was built on two parts, the historical one trying to find a
> historical formula as close to Roma Antiqua as possible and the
> alternative voting system to avoid the run-offs that had nearly
> "killed" elections in the years before (at least as I remember it).

I remember last year's run-offs all too well. I'm not going to get
into a debate on the finer points of the alternative voting system nor
the historical formula that's quite another subject. However I
believe that the run-offs would never have occured under the old
system if voters could have voted for more than one candidate when
faced with a slate of candidates and having to fill multiple
positions. That problem was solved by the Leges Fabia.


> >Perhaps a few statistics that I shared with Consular Fortunatus would
> >be a little enlightening:
>
> This is new to me, but very interesting.

I'd thought that Consular Fortunatus would have shared them with you
and hopefully this year's Consuls for them to consider.

> >63.2% of the ballots cast were demeed valid
> >36.8% of the ballots cast were demeed invalid
> >
> >85.3% of the invalid ballots were invalidated as having voted out
of turn
>
> Does this mean that it seemed to be hard to understand/remember
> _when_ (part of the historical system) a citizens should vote?

To answer that question honestly, I'm not sure whether it is hard to
remember or understand or not. For me it's pretty easy to remember
since I had to memorize the relevant sections when I was rogator.
Outside of a in-term vacancy, it's only going to be once a year that
voters are faced with the sequential voting in the Comitia Centuriata
as the sequential voting system is not the practice for voting on
Leges. Perhaps the best answer is for some it won't be easy to
remember because of being in the habit of through out the year being
able to vote anytime the Cista is open. I know I'm a creature of
habit so inspite of having the system drilled into my head I can't say
that in the future I won't accidently vote out of sequence out of habit.




> These figures are really interesting (once again I have not seen them
> before). If there were many that voted, any % could be alarming, but
> if 1% is only one or two persons the figures does say that much as I
> see it. So my next question is how many voted?

I think I can safely give these figures as there is no possible way
that anyone could figure out how anyone voted:

Of 223 ballots were cast:
141 were valid
82 were invalid

Of the invalid:
70 ballots were invalidated as being cast during the periods where
that century was not permitted to vote
4 Ballots were invalidated as having invalid voter codes
6 Ballots were invalidated as being duplicate votes
1 ballot was invalidated as being cast after the close of voting
1 ballot was invalidated as being cast after the close of voting and
for being a duplicate

Of the 70 invalidated as having been cast out of turn 32 revoted at
the proper time, thusly 38 voters were disenfranchised for voting out
of sequence. Please note I did some rounding in the percentages as
%63.22869951.... would only be of interest to a real hard core statician.

> Is there any of these
> (the four figures above) that for sure could be blamed on the
> Alternative voting system?

That is apples and oranges, Amice. The invalid votes were not used in
the tabulation of results. Please don't ask what would have happened
if all those invalid votes could have been counted towards the end
result. I can't answer that question since I've purged the
spreadsheets and email ballots from my computer and I think it's a
question best left unanswered.

> I also would like to ask if it be possible to get these figures in
> number of voters instead of %, as it is easier to see what the %
> repesents in that way?
>
> >Of the invalid votes cast out of turn only 45.7% returned to revote at
> >the proper time.
>
> This seem to be about difficulties with the "voting in turns" (the
> historical system), is that correct?

Actually it was really about infering that someone is stupid if that
didn't fully understand one section of a lex when there were a whole
parcel of people that didn't understand one or more sections of the
lex. I fielded questions concerning voting times. I also after the
election fielded questions on how on earth we derived the results,
which is really a hard question to answer when I can't reveal exactly
how each century voted and have to use general terms and hypothetical
examples. I hope I managed to satisfactorily answer those questions
that were asked of me, but I suspect there were a few who left as
puzzled as they were before they asked.

As for my objections of the alternate voting system after having
observed an election up close and personal I now feel it is actually
discriminatory towards certain centuries and tribes who don't vote
"the right way" in the first round. I believe it works absolutely
fine and fair in the case of the Censorship where only one position is
at stake. However when used to tabulate the results of multiple
positions when one set of voting units gets to cast a complete
different set of ballots in the second round and another set can only
cast the same ballot as in the first there is a grave disparity
occuring where by some voting units second choices are considered
while anothers is not.

For example in the past election those 28 centuries who chose Consul
Salix first got to cast subsequent vote for their second choice
whereas the 21 centuries that voted either Consul Marinus or Diana for
their first choice their second choice was not considered. That
second choice for those that voted for Diana may have been for Consul
Salix or may have been for Consul Marinus or may have not voted for a
second choice. Those that voted Consul Marinus first may have chosen
Diana or Consul Salix or noone as their second choice. So in effect
21 centuries had their second choice nullified because they didn't
vote for "the right candidate" in the first round. A system that
takes all century and tribes first and second choice (in the case of
Quaestors 3rd, 4th, 5th, ect choices) into consideration on the first
round would be not only more equitable, but far less likely to produce
a need for a second round where one subset of voting units gets to
essentially vote again and another does not.

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19192 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: The Excavations at Sepphoris
G. Iulius Scaurus S. P. D.

Salvete, Quirites.

Here's a link to "The Excavations at Sepphoris":

http://www.colby.edu/rel/archaeology/Israel.htm

This site contains excavation reports for the Graeco-Roman city of
Sepphoris, conducted by the University of South Florida, and an
interesting study of glasswork found there.

Valete.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19193 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Manius Constantinus Serapio"
<mcserapio@y...> wrote:
> AVE OPTIME Q CASSI CALVE
>
> > Actually there is very little difference.
>
> I must disagree. One thing is considering a system on the paper.
> Another thing is putting it into effect.
> In fact, when considering the system on the paper you can fully
> understand it, including the sequential aspect. However, when
> putting it into effect you have to check what your Centuria is, look
> for a message telling you when you can vote, how much you have to
> wait, etc. This can create confusion, of course, but you see it is
> created by the amount of actions one has to do, not by considering
> the system on the paper. ;-)
>
> BENE VALE
> M'Con.Serapio

Salve,

I think it is best we just agree to disagree, but we are probably both
correct just seeing it from different perspectives. See, I can be a
reasonable person. <grin>

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19194 From: Adrian Gunn Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Test
Test


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19195 From: Stefn_Ullarsson Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Endorsement for Stephanus Ullerius Ventor
Salus et Fortuna Maximus!

QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
> Salvete
> St. Ullerius was my Consular Quaestor. And he did an excellent job. He will
> do the same as Rogator.
> Valete
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>

I thank you kindly for the remembrance and endorsement.

My fellow Citizens of the New City:

I have ever sought with my varying levels of energy and resources, to
help those communities of which I am part.

In ancient times my forebears of North and South were often times
staring at each over over swordspoint.

In this new time, many have chosen to move beyond the old hurts and try
and build communities where heritage can be looked at, studied,
appreciated, preserved and built upon.

For me, helping build Nova Roma gives Honor to my Southern European
Ancestors. Just as helping form groups and host gatherings within my
Faith community pays Honor to my Northern Forebears, and to the
Northern Holy Ones.

I shall continue to help as best I can, in whatever capacity.

I shall be truly grateful, if the People of Nova Roma choose me to fil
the remaining seat in the Ragator's enclave.

--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.

In amicus sub fidelis
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Lictor pro Nova Roma
Cives et Paterfamilias
Religio Septentrionalis et Poet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19196 From: Gaia Fabia Livia Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Q. Cassius Calvus wrote:

> I don't believe that moving away from the partial historical
> sequential voting procedure is actually needed. Better communication
> and perhaps a software tweek that looks at the voter's century and the
> date/time to either allow the ballot to be cast if the voter is in the
> proper century or returns a message of what time that century may vote
> if it is not, would go a long way to taking care of that problem.
> Some people might not return to the Cista to vote again later but at
> least they will have been warned and not go on their merry way
> thinking they cast a valid ballot when in reality they did not.

This is a very good idea, of which I approve wholeheartedly. I'm glad
to see there are ways of dealing with this which don't involve a
sacrifice of historicity; we're plainly going to need to apply some
creative thinking to the problem (as you just have, thank you).

> At least we agree on something. <G>

As you see above, we agree on other things too. I think we're in quite
close accord generally, in that we find some interest in electoral
systems and care about what method is used and how it works. I expect
we're quite unusual in that respect! ;)

> As I said, I'd address this issue later in this missive, and so I
> shall. <G>

Excellent; thank you for taking the time.

> As an ex-rogator that has actually had to perform the duties required
> under both systems I think I am far more qualified to state which is
> better and more fair since I've seen both systems in actual real life
> use not just as mere theories on a piece of paper.

You are indeed in a good position, having used the Moravian system.
However it is worth noting at this point that both Cordus and I have
experience of other alternative vote systems in macronational (though
non-government) situations, so we do know what we're talking about a bit
;) I also have a fair amount of maths/physics training which inclines
me towards saying that good theory (modelling the possibilities) is as
good as doing something for real, but that's a story for another time.

> The Fabian system is based on neither on majority or plurality of
> votes, but on discrimination of votes. The Fabian system effectively
> allows some centuries/tribes to cast multiple votes while some
> centuries/tribes get to cast only one vote.

I'm afraid this is where you're mistaken. It *does* look that way, but
allow me to illustrate with an example based on a theatre company I'm
involved with, which conducts its elections by a hands-up variation on
the theme of alternative vote.

In the first round, everyone puts their hands up for whichever candidate
they support, and these are added up.

Then one candidate is either elected or eliminated.

Now, imagine this is our elections for Consul, and the first candidate
is elected Senior Consul.

Then, the people in the room *all* get the chance to put their hands up
for who they want to be the Junior Consul.

This is what happens in the Fabian system, with the one caveat that the
Fabian system assumes (and it is a reasonable assumption) that those who
voted for candidates who are still in the race would vote for them
again.

If we did not have this, there would still be run-offs (which isn't a
problem in our theatre company, because everyone is there in the room
and it takes seconds rather than weeks) because we would only have
elected one candidate.

Everyone gets to vote twice, but those who picked a candidate who didn't
win get to re-state that opinion. I think if you asked most people,
they would say that this is how they would choose to behave. After all,
if you support a candidate, do you stop supporting them just because
they didn't win the first round? (This is primarily a rhetorical
question, but you can answer it if you like. I certainly didn't see
people doing this last year.)

> As to your objection to majority/plurality

I wasn't objecting to it so much as pointing out the difference.

> a majority is generally
> considered the standard requirement as single candidate must meet in
> order to be elected in a from a single slate of candidates to fill a
> single position.

That is true.

> However in the case of single slate of candidates to
> fill multiple positions, a plurality is generally considered the
> standard needed for election.

Well, it is *used* in some circumstances, but I think you'll find most
serious electoral theorists condemn it as unfair.

The fact is that in the world today, we don't encounter that many
situations in which more than one candidate needs to be elected by a
given constituency, which is probably why plurality seems like an okay
way of dealing with it. I believe that most times when there *are*
multi-member constituencies in macronational government contexts, the
candidates are usually elected by a list system of proportional
representation (if anyone wants more details of what this means, do say
so, but basically it's only useful if there's a party system as each
party produces a list of candidates) not by plurality.

We did discuss (on this list, briefly) the possibility of a proportional
system when we were researching the electoral reforms last year. People
did not jump at the idea, but I will be happy to discuss it again if it
is of interest.

In any case, I understand proportionality to be the main viable
"opponent" of majority in the case of multi-member constituencies, not
in fact plurality. But here we are back to the ideological debate
again, and I am not qualified to speak about what ideals we prefer as a
nation :)

I hope I've addressed all your points; please let me know if I've
missed/misunderstood anything.

Vale,

Gaia Fabia Livia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19197 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Did the Romans wage a war or genocide against the Scots?
Salve,

An interesting, if a little vague, article from The Herald. This
might be something that more people will find interesting than
debating minute details of election algorithms. <G>

http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/7171-print.shtml

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19198 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Electoral systems (WAS: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor)
A. Apollonius Cordus to Q. Cassius Calvus and all
citizens and peregrines, greetings.

> Thank you for your enquiry into my health and I hope
> you feel better
> soon. Too much holidy cheer? <G>

Sadly not - something resembling a mild 'flu, though
probably caught from one of the various unwell friends
& relations I've seen in the last week or two.

> While that is an interesting suggestion with #3, it
> does pretty much
> defeat the purpose of the sequential voting system
> in the first place.
> I think a software tweek to either allow a valid
> vote to be cast or
> return a message stating that the voter's particular
> century needs to
> wait until such and such a time to vote would go a
> long way to solving
> the problem.

Yes, I hadn't thought of that option. That would
probably be still better, if it could be done.

> Actually the opposite is true. In the Moravian
> system one has to be
> in the top 5 candidates of each tribe and the top
> five of the all the
> tribes to get elected, I fail to see how a "tiny
> minority" could win
> an election under such conditions.

Fair enough. It's probably simplest if I just re-post
the message I sent to the plebeian list way back when
in which I explained how it could happen. I'll do it
in a separate message. Basically it becomes more
likely the more candidates you have - and we've seen
lately that the tribunate is hotly contested.

> ... However I can
> readily see how a
> minority candidate could easily win election under
> the Fabian system.

I think this depends upon your definition of a
minority candidate. Obviously a candidate who gets
more than 50% in a single round of first-past-the-post
(plurality) voting has won a majority. Equally
obviously, there's no way more than one candidate
could get a majority that way. However, multiple
candidates can win majorities if you allow people to
vote not only for their favourite but also for their
next favourite and so on. Thus although the winning
candidates may not be everyone's first choice, they
will very probably be high on everyone's list. That's
what the AV system does. It's not quite the same as an
outright, first-round majority, but it's still a
majority.

> As an ex-rogator that has actually had to perform
> the duties required
> under both systems I think I am far more qualified
> to state which is
> better and more fair since I've seen both systems in
> actual real life
> use not just as mere theories on a piece of paper.

An easy thing to say in the heat of debate, but you
know perfectly well that that's nonsense. Less than an
hour after you wrote that, you wrote to Constantinus
Serapio:

> If a
> system can not be
> fully understood on paper then logically it is very
> unlikely that it
> will work very well when put into effect.

Why so? Because an electoral system is a mathematical
system, and mathematical systems can be perfectly
understood on paper without having to try them out.
That's how we know Pythagoras' theorem without having
to test it on every triangle we can find. The
sequential voting is different: it has human
variables, so naturally the practice may differ from
the theory. When it comes to the vote-counting method,
though, there is nothing at all that you can know
about this system from personal experience that a
person couldn't work out with pen, paper and a
calculator.

> The Fabian system is based on neither on majority or
> plurality of
> votes, but on discrimination of votes. The Fabian
> system effectively
> allows some centuries/tribes to cast multiple votes
> while some
> centuries/tribes get to cast only one vote.

Fabia Livia has already explained why this is a
misapprehension, so I'll only summarize very briefly.
Every century gets the same number of votes, it's just
that only the centuries whose favourite candidate is
knocked out are allowed to change their minds. There's
nothing discriminatory about that.

> The politically correct term for this system
> of voting is
> called "preferential voting" in reality it is
> discimination voting
> because if your political unit doesn't vote "the
> right way" on the
> first round, your unit doesn't really get to cast a
> second ballot it
> just gets to cast the same one again.

You say this as though the system has a mind of its
own, knows who it wants to win, and shuffles the votes
accordingly. I've seen a lot of people express this
sort of view lately. It's absurd. A system can't rig
itself. There is no electoral system anyone can devise
which will elect X but won't elect Y if X and Y have
the same number of votes in the same configurations.
The Fabian system doesn't elect candidates based on
its own preferences, or mine, or Consul Marinus', or
anyone's. It elects the most widely supported
candidates. Even if Hannibal or Alaric the Visigoth
were running against Romulus and Scipio Africanus the
system would elect not the best candidate but the one
who had the widest support.

> However in the case of single slate
> of candidates to
> fill multiple positions, a plurality is generally
> considered the
> standard needed for election. The fatal flaw within
> the Lex Fabia is
> it takes a standard for a single position election
> and applies it to a
> multiposition election...

This 'fatal flaw' is lifted wholesale from genuine
Roman republican practice, and constitutes (in the
words of a citizen more knowledgeable about Roman
history than I) Rome's single most important
contribution to electoral practice. The Romans did not
permit anyone to become a magistrate unless he had won
a majority of tribes or centuries. In this respect the
Romans were centuries ahead of the game, and the
Fabian system simply follows their example. Accepting
less than a majority, as you advise, would be a huge
step backward.

________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19199 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: As promised, on the Moravian system
A. Apollonius Cordus to Q. Cassius Calvus and all
citizens and peregrines, greetings.

Firstly, for those who haven't read my last message, I
just want to be absolutely clear: the messages below,
first written on the 3rd and the 6th of November
respectively on the plebeian list, are reproduced here
not to express any criticism of Moravia Aventina, or
to pursue any personal crusade of mine, but simply to
answer Cassius Calvus' comment that he doesn't see how
the Moravian electoral system is likely to return a
candidate who is supported by a tiny minority and
opposed by a huge majority.

You may find it useful to bear in mind that there have
been seven candidates for tribune for the last two
years, so the possibilities I raise below are by no
means implausible.

3rd November last year:
---
1. Under your proposed system it would be possible for
someone to become tribune or plebeian aedile even if
he or she were supported by as few as

(with four candidates for aedile or seven for tribune)
34% of the tribes

(with five candidates for aedile or eight for tribune)
26% of the tribes

(with six candidates for aedile or nine for tribune)
21% of the tribes

and so on. Do you think an aedile or tribune elected
by that sort of minority can possibly be as legitimate
as one elected by more than 50%?

2. Under your proposed system it would be possible for
someone to become aedile or tribune even if as many as

(with four candidates for aedile or seven for tribune)
66% of the tribes

(with five candidates for aedile or eight for tribune)
74% of the tribes

(with six candidates for aedile or nine for tribune)
79% of the tribes

would prefer to have *any* other candidate but him or
her. Do you think it can possibly be right to have an
aedile or tribune who is opposed by such majorities?

I hope you'll think carefully about these questions.
If you answer 'no' to either or both of them, then you
must not be satisfied with the proposed system when
there is another, indeed several others, which do not
have these features.
---

6th November:
---
> I really read your email and I still can't imagine
> how you've come to the conclusion that 5 Tribunes
> who win because they get the first 5 highest votes
> are not getting the majority vote.

I'm glad that you're making an effort to understand my
arguments - it's a shame we didn't have this
conversation months ago.

A majority means more than half. Here's an example to
demonstrate how a tribune could be elected despite
being elected by fewer than half the tribes.

Let's imagine there are 10 tribes, because it's
simpler that way. The logic works the same however
many tribes there are. And let's imagine there are
seven candidates - a not unlikely event, I think -
called A, B, C, D, E, F, G.

Under your system each tribe votes for five
candidates. The results, then, might look like this:

Tribe 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
-----------------------------------------------
A A A A A A A A A A
B B B B B B B B B B
C C C C C C C C C C
D D D D D D D D D D
E E E F F F G G G G

A, B, C, D and G are elected, but G only got four
tribes - 40%, which is less than half.

The minority required gets smaller the more candidates
there are. With seven candidates, as we've seen, it's
just over a third; with eighth, just over a quarter;
with nine, just over a fifth; and so on.

Also, the more candidates there are the more likely it
becomes that more than one candidate will be elected
by less than half. Example with eleven candidates:

Tribe 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
-----------------------------------------------
A A A A A A A A A A
B B B B B B B B B B
C C C D D D E E E E
F F F G G G H H H H
I I I J J J K K K K

A, B, E, H and K are elected, but E, H and K only have
four tribes each - that's three out five tribunes
supported by fewer than half the tribes. With 15
candidates, it's possible that not a single tribune
would be supported by half the tribes.

Now, I'm sure you'd agree that a bigger selection of
candidates gives the voters more choice, and is good
for democracy - but under your system, more candidates
leads to more chance of minority elections, which is
bad for democracy.

There's another aspect, too. Imagine an election with
eight candidates again, but let's see what happens if
we can see each tribe's full preferences in order,
with their favourite candidate at the top and their
least favourite at the bottom:

Tribe 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
-----------------------------------------------
H H H H A A A A A A
A A A A B B B B B B
B B B B C C C C C C
C C C C D D D D D D
D D D D E E F F G G

E E E E F F E E E E
F F F F G G G G F F
G G G G H H H H H H

I've left a gap between each tribe's fifth and sixth
choice - the top five choices would be the votes of
the tribes under your system, which doesn't take
account of the rest. As you can see, A, B, C, D and H
would be elected under our system: but not only would
H have the support of only four tribes out of ten,
there are actually six tribes out of ten - 60% - which
would prefer to have *any* candidate *except* than H.
So a tribune has been elected who a majority of the
tribes strongly oppose!

As with the first problem, this problem gets more
likely and more serious the more candidates there are.
---

________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19200 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2004-01-03
Subject: Re: Did the Romans wage a war or genocide against the Scots?
Ave Quintus Cassius,
Thanks for posting this. I was getting VERY tired of all the name
calling and petty bickering about the past election. While there
were problems with the elections(as have been pointed out numerous
time's) it's time end the subject. And on Diana running for Quaestor
she seems fully qualified to do the job and I support her fully in her
"Quest for Quaestor".

Vale

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
--
Propraetor
Wichita, KS
America Medioccidentalis Superior

AIM: KSDeist
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19201 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-01-04
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Diana Moravia
<sacerdosveneris@y...> wrote:
> Salvete,
>
> As I have often said, I gladly dedicate my time to Nova Roma and
since I see that there is an
> opening for Quaestor that needs to be filled, I hereby declare my
candidacy for Quaestor of Nova
> Roma.
>
> I have been a citizen of Nova Roma since her infancy in 1999 and
since then have served as a
> Scriba to now Censor Caeso Fabius and later went on to serve as
Trbiune. In 2755 I was appointed
> Priestess of Venus.
>
> The position of Quaestor is to administer the funds allocated by
the Senate to the consuls,
> praetors, and aediles. My qualifications that are specifically
relevant to this position is that I
> was the Assistant Vice President of Fuji Bank for 9 years which had
been located in the World
> Trade Center and was personally responsible for the management and
investment of 4 billion USD per
> day. I later went on to work in Belgium for Big Fives: in Antwerp
for Ernst & Young and then in
> Brussels Belgium for Deloitte and Touche, in both cases as the
manager of their Financial
> Administration department.

Salvete Cives,

Diana Moravia's resume is indeed impressive inside and outside of
Nova Roma and makes her more than qualified for this office. Since
the duties of quaestor are primarily finacial, she is incredibly well
suited to be quaestor and would be an asset Nova Roma should not
overlook. Voting for a candidate should be based on his or her
qualifications, not on whether one attended a rally in Bologna. Her
qualifications are not in doubt.

Diana, I am glad to see you in the arena again ready to serve Nova
Roma. Nova Roma needs people like you.

Vale,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19202 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-04
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quaestor
Salve Cordus,

I'm well and I hope you are too. By the way, you don't have to call me 'Priestess' by the way,
Diana is just fine! If you notice, I'm rather informal at all times.

By the way before I forget, thank you for saying nice things about me in your New Year's message.

<Interestingly, this is what I and some of my then
<colleagues strongly encouraged everyone to do. Sadly
<no one seemed interested in testing the system for
<themselves, though several people demanded that we
<test it for them.

You're 100% right about that.

And if there are any other emails here about the election system, I'm not going to reply. I'm not
trying to avoid the subject, but as I said on New Year's Day, this is a year with a new beginning.
If someone proposes a new system during this year, then I'll get involved in that discussion. But
for me to keep complaining about last year's results would be non-productive and would imply that
I dislike Mrinus or am holding a grudge against him. As I even said during the election, Marinus
will be a good Consul. This a say without even the slightest hint of sarcasm in case anyone out
there is planning on saying that I am not being sincere.

Vale,
Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 19203 From: Diana Moravia Date: 2004-01-04
Subject: Re: Declaration of candidacy for Quastor
Salve Pomponia Fabia,

<Finally if you wish to converse on the ML I would suggest you
<respect Serapio & refer to him as civis or in a more dignifed manner
<than 'sweetie' or'dear'. We are Nova Romans, how you conduct yourself
<over at the Back Alley is of course your own concern.

'Dear and sweetie' is a term of endearment. When I met Serapio in person I'm sure that I referred
to him and other citizens who attended the same way. It is a part of my vocabulary and quite handy
for someone like me who is bad with names. In all the years that I've been in NR and other
organiazations you are the first person to comment negatively. Still though I'll note your
complaint: I'll be sure never to refer to you as sweetie or dear.

We *are* role playing in the Taverna -- drinking virtual drinks, etc. and we've all had quite a
few laughs there. In other words hon', lighten up.

Vle,
Diana