Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Jul 1-8, 2004

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25368 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: Re: Scipio, Strabo and the Censorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25369 From: Scriboni89@aol.com Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: Damanhur Community N. Italia...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25370 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: Re: Damanhur Community N. Italia...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25371 From: M. ADRIANVS COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: WEB OF NOVA ROMA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25372 From: sabina_equitia_doris Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: Welcome to New Members
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25373 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: Re: WEB OF NOVA ROMA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25374 From: M.ADRIANVS COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: Re: WEB OF NOVA ROMA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25375 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: Email problems
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25376 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: Re: WEB OF NOVA ROMA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25377 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: Re: Interview the Expert!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25378 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Resignation of Senator Lucius Pompeius Octavianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25379 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Interview the Expert!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25380 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Resignation of Senator Lucius Pompeius Octavianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25381 From: FAC Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Damanhur Community N. Italia...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25382 From: FAC Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: WEB OF NOVA ROMA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25383 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Resignation of Senator Lucius Pompeius Octavianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25384 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Damanhur Community N. Italia...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25385 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Roman Eagle?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25386 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Digest No 1377
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25387 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Scipio, Strabo and the Censorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25388 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Scipio, Strabo and the Censorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25389 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Scipio, Strabo and the Censorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25390 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: RESULTS OF COMITIA POPULI AND COMITIA PLEBIS TRIBUTA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25391 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Voting Results from the Comitia Centuriata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25392 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Roman Eagle?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25393 From: k.a.wright Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Voting Results from the Comitia Centuriata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25394 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Rosa Equitia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25395 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Voting Results from the Comitia Centuriata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25396 From: P. Minucia Tiberia Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Many Thanks
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25397 From: Marcus Arminius Maior Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: New laws
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25398 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Congratulations Sulla
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25399 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: Voting Results from the Comitia Centuriata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25400 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: Voting Results from the Comitia Centuriata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25401 From: FAC Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: Scipio, Strabo and the Censorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25402 From: FAC Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: Many Thanks
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25403 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Edictum Pro Praetore: Ludis Apollinaribus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25404 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: Rosa Equitia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25405 From: M.Traianus Valerius Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Congratulations Sulla
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25406 From: Seia Silvania Atia Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: Rosa Equitia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25407 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: Edictum Pro Praetore: Ludis Apollinaribus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25408 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: Edictum Pro Praetore: Ludis Apollinaribus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25409 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: Edictum Pro Praetore: Ludis Apollinaribus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25410 From: daniel villanueva Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: My resignation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25411 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: My resignation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25412 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-07-04
Subject: Re: Roman Eagle?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25413 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-07-04
Subject: Macronational Holiday
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25414 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-04
Subject: Re: Macronational Holiday
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25415 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-07-04
Subject: Back Again, temporarily bumped from yahoo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25416 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2004-07-04
Subject: Important Correction on Ludi Circenses for Ludi Apollonares
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25417 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2004-07-05
Subject: Family Traditions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25418 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-05
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25419 From: sabina_equitia_doris Date: 2004-07-05
Subject: Re: Roman Eagle?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25420 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2004-07-05
Subject: Re: Damanhur Community N. Italia...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25421 From: hucke@cynico.net Date: 2004-07-05
Subject: Re: Approved document
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25422 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2004-07-05
Subject: De absentia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25423 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2004-07-05
Subject: Chat room
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25424 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2004-07-05
Subject: Re: Chat room
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25425 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Professor chases Roman-era pirate ships
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25426 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Chat room
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25427 From: Marcus Traianus Valerius Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25428 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25429 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25430 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25431 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25432 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25433 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Report of the First Lectisternium of the Ludi Apollinares
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25434 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25435 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Pompeii 'answers' in docu-drama
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25436 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Scipio, Strabo and the Censorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25437 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Voting Results from the Comitia Centuriata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25438 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Many Thanks
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25439 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Voting Results from the Comitia Centuriata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25440 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Many Thanks
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25441 From: sabina_equitia_doris Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25442 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25443 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25444 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25445 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25446 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25447 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25448 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25449 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25450 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25451 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25452 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25453 From: Lucius Pompeius Octavianus Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: withdrawal of resignation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25454 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25455 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25456 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: withdrawal of resignation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25457 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25458 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25459 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25460 From: k.a.wright Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25461 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25462 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25463 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25464 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25465 From: K Wright Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25466 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25467 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25468 From: FAC Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25469 From: FAC Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25470 From: FAC Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Martiale and the public morality
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25471 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25472 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Dignitas, moral and Bacchanalia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25473 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25474 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25475 From: FAC Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25476 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25477 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas, moral and Bacchanalia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25478 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25479 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Martiale and the public morality
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25480 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25481 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas, moral and Bacchanalia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25482 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25483 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25484 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25485 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25486 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: withdrawal of resignation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25487 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25488 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25489 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25490 From: Mike Abboud Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Roman Censors
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25491 From: Marcus Bianchius Antonius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25492 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25493 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25494 From: Marcus Traianus Valerius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25495 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25496 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25497 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25498 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: If You Really Wanna do The Morality Dance
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25499 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25500 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Full Link to the Morals Song
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25501 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25502 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25503 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25504 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: yawn (was Dignitas!)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25505 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25506 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25507 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25508 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25509 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25510 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Martiale and the public morality
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25511 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25512 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25513 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25514 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25515 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25516 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25517 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25518 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Roman Censors
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25519 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25520 From: Marcus Traianus Valerius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25521 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Out of Pocket
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25522 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25523 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25524 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25525 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25526 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25527 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25528 From: Marcus Bianchius Antonius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25529 From: Agrippina Modia Aurelia Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25530 From: Agrippina Modia Aurelia Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25531 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25532 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25533 From: Marcus Traianus Valerius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25534 From: Marcus Traianus Valerius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25535 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25536 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25537 From: David Bustillos Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25538 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25539 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25540 From: David Bustillos Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25541 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas, moral and Bacchanalia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25542 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Apology
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25543 From: Censored Diana Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Resignation



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25368 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: Re: Scipio, Strabo and the Censorship
Salve Drusus ~

I do not know, nor do I care, what motivated Cato's criticism; I DO
know what motivated my own, however, and it had nothing to do with
criticizing the Messenger in an effort to ignore the Message.

I care about our Senate being taken seriously, and I care about the
Religio being taken seriously, and I feel that your utter disregard for
public appearance or public behaviour seriously detract from both of
those Institutions being taken seriously!

So I urge you, CARE about your spelling, CARE about appearing ignorant,
choose your words with care and MAKE AN EFFORT to be a credit to both
the Senate and the Religio! TAKE the time, please! You may not care
personally, but you are NOT just a private person ~ You are a
Representative of two Institutions that deserve to be treated with
Dignitas, Gravitas and all due Respect: YOU need to treat that status
accordingly!

Vale
~ Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus

On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, at 01:42 PM, Lucius Sicinius Drusus wrote:

> Cato,
>
> I Have a total lack of intrest in the absurdities of English Spelling,
> a lack of time to transcibe everything from Yahoo's web based program
> to a spell checker, and as little desire to please the Anal-retentive
> as intrest in English spelling.
>
> I See nothing in your earlier post other than a desire to discredit
> the message by attempting to discredit the messager which is one of
> those personal attacks that we hear so much about from some people, or
> at least hear about when someone they disagree with makes a post.
>
> Drusus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
> wrote:
>> G. Equitius Cato D. Iunio Silano L. Sicinio Druso S.P.D.
>>
>> salvete.
>>
>> Iunius Silanus, if he is not corrected by anyone, how will he learn?
>> It is more important that we present an educated face to the world
>> than to be afraid of correction. I do not correct non-English
>> speakers because they are struggling under a tongue other than their
>> own. That is courtesy.
>>
>> Sicinius Drusus, I am not *attacking* you, and I have no interest in
>> the little flame thing you've got going on. But if you're going to
>> pontificate, I am suggesting that you do it correctly.
>>
>> valete,
>>
>> Cato
>>
>> P.S. - it's "crocodile" GEC
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Sicinius Drusus"
>> <drusus@b...> wrote:
>>> LOL,
>>>
>>> Typical,
>>>
>>> When you are unable to refute the gist of a message lower yourself
>> to
>>> attacking the style of the message.
>>>
>>> So why isn't this one of those personal attacks that so many
>> crocidile
>>> tears have been shed over?
>>>
>>> Is that something that depends on WHO make a post rather than what
>> is
>>> posted?
>>>
>>> L. Sicinius Drusus
>>>
>>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
>> <mlcinnyc@y...>
>>> wrote:
>>>> G. Equitius Cato L. Sicinius Drusus S.D.
>>>>
>>>> Salve, Drusus.
>>>>
>>>> I know you believe that this List is just a "virtual" Forum, but
>>>> unfortunately right now it is the only Forum we have. As such,
>> it
>>>> might behoove a pontiff and senator of Nova Roma to try to learn
>> to
>>>> spell a little more accurately. "SPEACH"? Do you
>> mean "speech"? Or
>>>> are you referring to some other, as-yet-unrevealed
>>>> activity? "POLITICALY"? I think you mean "politically".
>>>> And I find it a source of great amusement that you of all people
>>>> cannot spell "tolerance" correctly, as evidenced by earlier
>> posts.
>>>> How are we supposed to gain or keep the respect we desire from
>> those
>>>> outside NR when our "leading" citizens cannot express themselves
>>>> correctly in their native tongue?
>>>>
>>>> If, of course, English is *not* your first language, you can be
>>>> excused, with my apologies. Otherwise, get a dictionary. And a
>>>> thesaurus.
>>>>
>>>> I do, however, enjoy your random capitalization of words; it has
>> a
>>>> certain 18th-century flair to it.
>>>>
>>>> vale,
>>>>
>>>> Cato
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Sicinius Drusus"
>>>> <drusus@b...> wrote:
>>>>> I Thought you favored recreating the Best of Rome. Restricting
>>>>> political speach is recreating the Rome that existed under
>> Sulla's
>>>>> proscriptions, the Rome that existed when Caligula's or
>> Domitian's
>>>>> spies, When Romans feared speaking their minds about their
>> leaders.
>>>>>
>>>>> Attempts to impose Politicaly Correct Speach are tools of
>> repression
>>>>> and political censorship.
>>>>>
>>>>> L. Sicinius Drusus
>>>>>
>>>>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Arminius Faustus"
>>>>> <lafaustus@y...> wrote:
>>>>>> Salve,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, they are as well intended to harm psicologically, they
>> are a
>>>>>> subtle violence of the worst kind. There is people here in NR
>>>>>> specialist on this, on transforming this list on a partisan
>> hell,
>>>>>> turning everything into polemic, making a countless cause of
>>>>>> abandoning of prospective and peaceful citizens, silent
>>>> resignations,
>>>>>> we will never know until next census.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (I warn: It was not the case that initially started the
>>>> subject... we
>>>>>> have already deviated the subject. Paulinus is a kind man.
>>>> However,
>>>>>> it is pretty to good warn in the beggining to not see him
>> falling
>>>> on
>>>>>> these flaws too... I have already seen many citizens sadly
>>>> falling on
>>>>>> the truculence temptation...)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As Tribune, I deplore any polemist and truculent conduct and
>> as
>>>>>> magistrate I make everything under my capabilities to prevent
>>>> this
>>>>>> kind of behaviour, and not only legally, but with my words
>> and
>>>>>> exemple, the most powerful acting. This is a public
>> compromise in
>>>>>> front of the gods and people of Rome.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is ironical that this subject started when I was attacked
>> by
>>>>>> giving support to a very good citizen, Pompeia Minucia
>> Strabo,
>>>>>> refering to her imense qualities and roman virtues, comparing
>>>> with
>>>>>> real situations of Roman History, without talking of anyone
>> more.
>>>> But
>>>>>> this - hate - we see rotting Nova Roma, seems to turn
>> everything
>>>> on a
>>>>>> matter of battlefield. If I have deplored someone, it would
>> be
>>>> fair
>>>>>> someone coming in defense, but we cannot even praise the good
>>>>>> citizens, there is someone coming in attack? Where we are? On
>> a
>>>>>> tavern fight? Or on a recriation of the Roman Republic on its
>>>> best?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let´s drop the matter. These posts are pretty tiresome...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vale,
>>>>>> L. Arminius Faustus TRP
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PS. Yes, I know Kafka and have read him some times.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Sicinius Drusus"
>>>>>> <drusus@b...> wrote:
>>>>>>> Salve,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Words are NOT violence unless they convey a threat of
>> physical
>>>> harm,
>>>>>>> and attempts to redefine them as such is an effort to
>> impose
>>>>>> political
>>>>>>> censorship.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kafkaesque refers to the novels of Kafka which presented a
>>>> surreal
>>>>>>> distortion of reality, an apt description of that
>> endorsement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> L. Sicinius Drusus
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Arminius Faustus"
>>>>>>> <lafaustus@y...> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Salve,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ill words are too a violence, and unfortunatly a very
>> common
>>>> form
>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> agression in Nova Roma, specially dear to some factions
>> here,
>>>> to
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> greater damage of Nova Roma. (This surely wasn´t the case
>>>> of
>>>> the
>>>>>> post
>>>>>>>> I was talking)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "> If you wish to avoid being mocked then try to avoid
>>>> posting
>>>>>>>> something > best described as Kafkaesque Surreality, like
>>>> that
>>>>>>>> endorsement of Strabo."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am I a mirror? You should read carefully your own posts
>>>> before
>>>>>> saying
>>>>>>>> this to me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Vale bene,
>>>>>>>> L. Arminius Faustus TRP
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Sicinius
>> Drusus"
>>>>>>>> <drusus@b...> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> The sacrosanct status of a Tribune protects him from
>>>> physical
>>>>>>>> attacks,
>>>>>>>>> threats of violence, or legal action while he is a
>> Tribune.
>>>> It
>>>>>>>> offers
>>>>>>>>> no protection from being Mocked, neither from a citizen
>> nor
>>>>>> another
>>>>>>>>> Tribune.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you wish to avoid being mocked then try to avoid
>> posting
>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>>> best described as Kafkaesque Surreality, like that
>>>> endorsement
>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> Strabo.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> L. Sicinius Drusus
>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25369 From: Scriboni89@aol.com Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: Damanhur Community N. Italia...
Salvete Omnes,

Recently, while searching the web, I stumbled upon this website:
http://www.damanhur.org/
The site it that of the Damanhur. "Damanhur is an internationally renowned
center for spiritual research. Situated in Valchiusella Valley, in the Alpine
foothills of northern Italy, Damanhur is a Federation of Communities and Regions
with over 800 citizens, a social and political structure, a Constitution, 40
economic activities, its own currency, schools and a daily paper." I found the
site interesting, because these people have established a self-sufficent
community of their own. Something to which we want?????? I thought it would be
something interesting to share with everyone.

Vale,

Gnaeus Scribonius Scriptor
"The natural impolse of men is to follow, and the ones with the strongest
sense of purpose will always dominate the rest"


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25370 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: Re: Damanhur Community N. Italia...
AVETE SCRIBONI OMNESVQE

I know Damanhur very well. In fact Valchiusella Valley is near to
where I live and the venue of its bureau is in Turin, just in front
of my house. :-)
Every time we talk about a real territory for Nova Roma I
immediately think about Damanhur as something we could look at. They
have a small city in this valley, with its our architectural style.
They have both residential and spiritual buildings. They get money
to pay taxes from handicraft and web-design.

BTW, in Valchiusella Valley there is also a Roman bridge...
You see it would not be impossible to build a Roman community like
Damanhur in Italy, just near Roman remains... :-)

BENE VALETE
M'Con.Serapio
Propraetor Italiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25371 From: M. ADRIANVS COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: WEB OF NOVA ROMA
Salvete,

Who is the webmaster of the web of Nova Roma?

Valete bene

M.ADR. COMPLVTENSIS
Legatvs Hispaniae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25372 From: sabina_equitia_doris Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: Welcome to New Members
Salvete Omnes!

I seldom post, but do observe our numbers go up and down. We do
indeed have some new members, and I would like to extend a general
welcome to them.

Some of the recent less than cordial correspondence you have been
reading is not typical of the mindset of those whom I would dare call
the "silent majority" of NR. We come here for many reasons; Love of
history, love of the Latin language, love of the Roman Virtues, as
well as for numerous other worthy reasons. "We" mere history
enthususiasts, wholesome hobbyists, *are* the majority, but few dare
post, out of what? Fear? Fear of what? Pixels?

The recent discussion of 'Who Were the Best Generals of Antiquity?'
ia the kind of discourse which I would venture to say characterises
the better (if not 'best') nature of this forum.

It is sad that such a proportion of this forum is taken up with ugly
words. I sincerely hope that every new member here finds new friends
via private correspondence and sodalitates, and takes the bitterness
on this Main List with a large grain of salt.

There is room here for all who love the heritage of Rome.

--Sabina Equitia Doris,
merely a history enthusiast
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25373 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: Re: WEB OF NOVA ROMA
Salvete Quirites,

M. ADRIANVS COMPLVTENSIS asked:

> Who is the webmaster of the web of Nova Roma?

At the moment, nobody. The last one resigned, and we have just recently
had a declaration of candidacy for the job by Flavius Vedius Germanicus.
I will be calling an election later in the month of July to fill the
vacancy.

This has not left us entirely without web services. Titus Octavius Pius
has continued to maintain the website as his studies and final exams
have allowed. He has been helped by other scribes, most notably Julilla
Sempronia Magna.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25374 From: M.ADRIANVS COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: Re: WEB OF NOVA ROMA
Salvete,

Tanks for the information.

Valete bene

Complutensis

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
Salvete Quirites,

M. ADRIANVS COMPLVTENSIS asked:

> Who is the webmaster of the web of Nova Roma?

At the moment, nobody. The last one resigned, and we have just recently
had a declaration of candidacy for the job by Flavius Vedius Germanicus.
I will be calling an election later in the month of July to fill the
vacancy.

This has not left us entirely without web services. Titus Octavius Pius
has continued to maintain the website as his studies and final exams
have allowed. He has been helped by other scribes, most notably Julilla
Sempronia Magna.

Valete,

-- Marinus


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25375 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: Email problems
Salvete,

I'm currently having email problems, which should be resolved with
24 hours. In the mean time, any email sent to me will bounce, and I
will not ever receive it (it will not stack up waiting for me). So
if anyone has sent me anything and gotten a weird bounce message,
please re-send in a day or two.

Thanks.

Vale,

Flavius Vedius Germanicus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25376 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: Re: WEB OF NOVA ROMA
Salve

The office is currently vacant and one person has come forward to stand for election as the webmaster.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: M. ADRIANVS COMPLVTENSIS
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:29 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] WEB OF NOVA ROMA


Salvete,

Who is the webmaster of the web of Nova Roma?

Valete bene

M.ADR. COMPLVTENSIS
Legatvs Hispaniae


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25377 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2004-07-01
Subject: Re: Interview the Expert!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Iulius" <21aprile@e...>
wrote:
> AVETE OMNES
>
> We finally have the answers of Prof Cristofori, about
>
> "ROMAN ITALY"
>
> I found them really interesting, so I recommend them to all of
you.
> I learnt a lot with this reading!
>
> Here you can read the answers:
> http://www.novaroma.org/expert/index.htm
>
> BENE VALETE
> L IUL SULLA
> Magister Academiae Italicae

P.Minius Albucius Lucio Iulio Sullae s.d.,
S.V.G.E.V.R.

Dear Iucius Iulius,

I did not find any answer at the address above. Are you sure that Pr
David's answers have been inserted in the web site ?

Vale.
Scr. Cadomago, Gallia, a.d. VI Nonas Quintiles MMDCCLVII a.u.c.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25378 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Resignation of Senator Lucius Pompeius Octavianus
Gaius Modius Athanasius S.P.D.

In my capacity as Tribunus Plebis I report to the people of Nova Roma that
Lucius Pompeius Octavianus has resigned as a senator of Nova Roma for personal
reasons.

Valete;

Gaius Modius Athanasius
Tribunus Plebis


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25379 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Interview the Expert!
SALVE PUBLI ALBUCI

We now have prof. Cristofori's answers, as you can see, because I
sent the questions to Prof David only a couple of days ago, after the
end of terms for the collection and choosing.

At the moment, I invite you to read prof Cristofori's ones, they are
really interesting!

VALE
L IUL SULLA


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "publiusalbucius"
<albucius_aoe@h...> wrote:
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Iulius" <21aprile@e...>
> wrote:
> > AVETE OMNES
> >
> > We finally have the answers of Prof Cristofori, about
> >
> > "ROMAN ITALY"
> >
> > I found them really interesting, so I recommend them to all of
> you.
> > I learnt a lot with this reading!
> >
> > Here you can read the answers:
> > http://www.novaroma.org/expert/index.htm
> >
> > BENE VALETE
> > L IUL SULLA
> > Magister Academiae Italicae
>
> P.Minius Albucius Lucio Iulio Sullae s.d.,
> S.V.G.E.V.R.
>
> Dear Iucius Iulius,
>
> I did not find any answer at the address above. Are you sure that
Pr
> David's answers have been inserted in the web site ?
>
> Vale.
> Scr. Cadomago, Gallia, a.d. VI Nonas Quintiles MMDCCLVII a.u.c.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25380 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Resignation of Senator Lucius Pompeius Octavianus
Salve Tribune,

<In my capacity as Tribunus Plebis I report to the people of Nova Roma that
<Lucius Pompeius Octavianus has resigned as a senator of Nova Roma for personal
<reasons.

Ah that is too bad. I hope that all is well with him and wish him the best of luck. It was a
pleasure working with him last year when we were both Tribunes.

Vale,
Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25381 From: FAC Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Damanhur Community N. Italia...
Salve Propraetor Serapio,

is Damanhur the micronation/holistic organization with an own
economy and own coins? I remember to have seen a TV reportage about
Damanhur or a similar organization. It's so potent and important
that the several societies of this organization seems to have an
incoming of 250 mln euro. It is one of the most important economical
source of the Valley. It have an own coins and a complicated but
detailed structure permitting it to have several members in the
local italian public political Istitutions.
The headquarter of this organization is great and wonderful, very
rich and spiritual. Now they have an agency in the most important
cities in Italy and Europe.

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Manius Constantinus Serapio"
<mcserapio@y...> wrote:
> AVETE SCRIBONI OMNESVQE
>
> I know Damanhur very well. In fact Valchiusella Valley is near to
> where I live and the venue of its bureau is in Turin, just in
front
> of my house. :-)
> Every time we talk about a real territory for Nova Roma I
> immediately think about Damanhur as something we could look at.
They
> have a small city in this valley, with its our architectural
style.
> They have both residential and spiritual buildings. They get money
> to pay taxes from handicraft and web-design.
>
> BTW, in Valchiusella Valley there is also a Roman bridge...
> You see it would not be impossible to build a Roman community like
> Damanhur in Italy, just near Roman remains... :-)
>
> BENE VALETE
> M'Con.Serapio
> Propraetor Italiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25382 From: FAC Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: WEB OF NOVA ROMA
Salvete Omnes,

updating the officlian NR website I noted that there are several
differences and errors between the original english version and the
other-language versions.
The vacancy of the webmaster is creating several problems of
organization.

As former Scriba Curatoris Aranei I remember to all the people
updating the website that we have an official mailing list about our
job. I would invite you to report in this list all your actions on
the website. In this way everyone could check and correct the own
version.

Thank you

VAlete
fr. Apulus Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25383 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Resignation of Senator Lucius Pompeius Octavianus
Salvete,

It is sadness no meaning. Latin America loses a representative on the
Senate. However, we understand the necessities of him.

Vale bene in pacem deorum,
L. Arminius Faustus
Brasilia Propraetor


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, AthanasiosofSpfd@a... wrote:
> Gaius Modius Athanasius S.P.D.
>
> In my capacity as Tribunus Plebis I report to the people of Nova
Roma that
> Lucius Pompeius Octavianus has resigned as a senator of Nova Roma
for personal
> reasons.
>
> Valete;
>
> Gaius Modius Athanasius
> Tribunus Plebis
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25384 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Damanhur Community N. Italia...
AVE FRANCISCE APVLE CAESAR TRIBVNE

[snip]

Yes. Damanhur is that. Of course, they had a lot of money to build
all of that. We would need too... :-)

BENE VALE
M'Con.Serapio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25385 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Roman Eagle?
Salve


Was the Roman Eagle a Golden Eagle that is still found or another one?


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25386 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Digest No 1377
L Equitius Cincinnatus Augur Quiritibus salutem dicit

Salvete

I am very saddened at this turn of events. I pray that my friend Octavianus
will reconsider and consider a "personal leave of absence".

Valete

> From: "Lucius Arminius Faustus" <lafaustus@...>
> Subject: Re: Resignation of Senator Lucius Pompeius Octavianus
>
> Salvete,
>
> It is sadness no meaning. Latin America loses a representative on the
> Senate. However, we understand the necessities of him.
>
> Vale bene in pacem deorum,
> L. Arminius Faustus
> Brasilia Propraetor
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, AthanasiosofSpfd@a... wrote:
> > Gaius Modius Athanasius S.P.D.
> >
> > In my capacity as Tribunus Plebis I report to the people of Nova
> Roma that
> > Lucius Pompeius Octavianus has resigned as a senator of Nova Roma
> for personal
> > reasons.
> >
> > Valete;
> >
> > Gaius Modius Athanasius
> > Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25387 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Scipio, Strabo and the Censorship
Actually I'm rather fond of the Roman art of Satire, but alas, the
humor impaired Nova Roman Thought Police just jump up and down
screaming "personal insult" when satire is attempted.

Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@a... wrote:

> This could be construed as an unfairness on my part that I prefer a
style that
> reflects wit, humor, and good language skills.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25388 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Scipio, Strabo and the Censorship
Hold on --- there are Nova Roman Thought Police? I wanna join! Do
you get a badge? And a hat? Do they match the citizen's toga or are
they shiny (well, at least the badge)? Do you get a whistle? I need
to know more.


Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Sicinius Drusus"
<drusus@b...> wrote:
> Actually I'm rather fond of the Roman art of Satire, but alas, the
> humor impaired Nova Roman Thought Police just jump up and down
> screaming "personal insult" when satire is attempted.
>
> Drusus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@a... wrote:
>
> > This could be construed as an unfairness on my part that I prefer
a
> style that
> > reflects wit, humor, and good language skills.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25389 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Scipio, Strabo and the Censorship
Sorry,

No Badges or hats, you just get to show selective outrage when the
"wrong" person disagrees with the politicaly correct viewpoint.

Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
> Hold on --- there are Nova Roman Thought Police? I wanna join! Do
> you get a badge? And a hat? Do they match the citizen's toga or are
> they shiny (well, at least the badge)? Do you get a whistle? I need
> to know more.
>
>
> Cato
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Sicinius Drusus"
> <drusus@b...> wrote:
> > Actually I'm rather fond of the Roman art of Satire, but alas, the
> > humor impaired Nova Roman Thought Police just jump up and down
> > screaming "personal insult" when satire is attempted.
> >
> > Drusus
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@a... wrote:
> >
> > > This could be construed as an unfairness on my part that I prefer
> a
> > style that
> > > reflects wit, humor, and good language skills.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25390 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: RESULTS OF COMITIA POPULI AND COMITIA PLEBIS TRIBUTA
L. Arminius Faustus Tribunus Plebis SPD

It is a immense pleasure for me to announce the results of Comitia Populi and Comitia Plebis Tributa. For a magistrate, it is a most rewarding experience.

I thank every vote on this effort to make a better Nova Roma throught legislation and the sovereign rule of the roman people of the quirites.

I ask also the Plebeian Aediles to help the Curator Aranae or anyone in charge on uploading this tribunitian legislation.

I also want to most warmly thank citizen Flavia Tullia Valeria Scholastica, by the proof-read and latin version of the text for the Comitia.

I praise Iove of Capitolium, as well as Ceres and Diana, patronessess of the Plebs, by these Comitia. Only by their endless blessings Nova Roma can grow.





Results:



Comitia Populi Tributa:


1. Lex Arminia de Levandis Censorum Oneribus:

yes 22, no 10, abstentions 2, ties 1, law is passed.

Tie is resolved as NO - No 11 tribes

LAW IS APPROVED



2. Lex Arminia de Fovenda Lingua Latina:

yes 18, no 12, abstentions 4, ties 1, law is passed.

Tie is resolved as YES - Yes 19 tribes

LAW IS APPROVED


3. Lex Arminia Equitia de Dignitate Curuli:

yes 25, no 7, abstentions 2, ties 1, law is passed.

Tie is resolved as YES - Yes 26 tribes

LAW IS APPROVED


4. Lex Arminia Equitia de Imperio:

yes 24, no 8, abstentions 2, ties 1, law is passed.

Tie is resolved as NO - No 9 tribes

LAW IS APPROVED





Comitia Plebis Tributa:

1. Lex Arminia de Potestate Tribunicia ad Comitia Convocanda:

yes 18, no 6, abstentions 10, ties 1, law is passed.

Tie is resolved as YES - Yes 19 tribes

LAW IS APPROVED


2. Lex Arminia de Ministris Tribunorum:

yes 20, no 4, abstentions 10, ties 1, law is passed.

Tie is resolved as NO - No 5 tribes

LAW IS APPROVED


---


Valete bene in pacem deorum,
L. Arminius Faustus TRP



---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail agora ainda melhor: 100MB, anti-spam e antivírus grátis!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25391 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Voting Results from the Comitia Centuriata
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Quiritibus Salutem Plurimam Dicit:

Chief Rogator Cordus has reported the results of the voting in the
Comitia Centuriata.


In the contest for Censor, Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix was the choice
of 25 centuries. Pompeia Minucia-Tiberia Strabo was the choice of 18
centuries. 43 Centuries cast votes. There were eight centuries in which
no vote was cast. Therefore the number of centuries required for a
majority was 22. Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix obtained a majority of
centuries in the first round, and is elected Censor suffectus, to serve
as such until the end of this year.

Congratulations to Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, and my thanks to both
candidates for being willing to step forward to serve.


The Lex Equitia Galeria de Ordinariis has been approved by the Comitia
Centuriata. 37 centuries voted to approve, 5 centuries voted against
approval, and nine centuries abstained. Having now been approved by the
Comitia Centuriata and by the Senate, the Lex Equitia Galeria de
Ordinariis amends the Constitution of Nova Roma.

My thanks to Tribune Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for his great help in
the drafting of this law. It provides us with the means to address a
difficult problem.

Valete Quirites,

Gn. Equitius Marinus
Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25392 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Roman Eagle?
F. Galerius Aurelianus Tb. Galerio Paulino. Salve, cousin.

According to Webster and Connolly, during the Civil Wars and the early
Principate, the Eagles of the Legions were silver with gold accentuations. By the
reign of Claudius, the Eagles were gold. Eagles as a legio symbol were noted
as early as the Cataline War but this may be apocryphal. We know that Caesar's
legions in Gaul had eagles and Crassus had them in Persia. During the
greater part of the Republic when the maniple was the primary tactical unit, the
emblem was a hand with the maniple number below. These were usually silver and
bronze construction. The cohort became the primary tactical unit for both
legions and the auxiliary during the Civil Wars and this became standard by the
Principate. The maniple standard went out of use to be replaced by the cohort
standard, while centuries and other smaller formations separated from their
legion used the vexillari standard; which is similar to the Nova Roman flag.
There were also some cohorts that had some emblems in the shape of the
astrological sign of the formation. The Praetorian Guard cohorts used a scorpio; the
Sixth Legion had a capricorn. There were also gold and silver images of the
emperor and members of his family carried by imaginifers (I think that is what
they were called). Vale.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25393 From: k.a.wright Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Voting Results from the Comitia Centuriata
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gnaeus Equitius Marinus" <


Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix obtained a majority of
> centuries in the first round, and is elected Censor suffectus, to serve
> as such until the end of this year.

Congratulations - I've never been more pleased about an election result.

Flavia Lucilla Merula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25394 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Rosa Equitia
L Equitius Cincinnatus Augur Quiritibus salutem dicit

Salvete

I'm pleased to announce the newest member of Gens Equitia.

Rosa Equitia filiae Seia Silvania Atia Iunonis Templi Sacerdotes

Atia, please remember to send along the proper application to Censores so
that she may be properly enrolled as a citizen.


> On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:51:00 -0400 "Lucius Equitius" writes:

> >Salve, Seia
> >
> >I'm sorry I've neglected to reply to you since then. I can only claim
it's
> >my fault and offer the excuse that I've been very busy with the kids and
> >going to physical therapy to rehabilitate my broken hip. It seems as
though
> >my problem is that the screws that they used to patch me up are becoming
> >loose, and are coming out! ouch! no wonder I'm in pain most of the
> >time whenever I move!?
> >
>
> Salve, Pater <G>
>
> That's OK ... It looks like our luck may be
> shifting LOL
>
> I'm sorry to hear that you have loose screws (sorry, couldn't help myself
> LOL)

L Equitius: Got me fair and square ;-)

> > Anyway, it's plain that Rose should be Rosa Equitia (doh, what was I
> >thinking?).
> >
>
> PERFECT!!!! Now as the proud grandPater could you announce it, please
> <G>

L Equitius: Indeed, I am proud.

If NovaRoma has done nothing else it has allowed me to meet great people and
make new friends. Think of your friends when you become despondent, truely
one is rich who as many friends and a loving family.

> >So, how are you all doing? I trust the baby is being properly spoiled ;-)
> >It's finally summer break and the weather hasn't gotten 'god awful
> >hot' so we're doing ok.
> >
> >Vale, Cincinnatus
> >
>
> Rose is definately spoiled LOL. She has just about everyone here wrapped
> tightly around one finger or another.
>
> The weather here is pretty much just plain hot LOL.
>
>
> Pax,

Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25395 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Re: Voting Results from the Comitia Centuriata
L Cornelio Sullae S.P.D. Fl Vedius Germanicus

S.V.B.E.E.V.

Please accept my humble congratulations on your great victory. I am
certain that Nova Roma shall be well-served during your term in
office.

Also, may I say to your worthy opponent in the cista, that her
campaign for office was well-fought, and that even though I did not
support her in this particular race I look forward to seeing her
standing for office in the future, so that her desire to serve the
Republic shall find a perfect match for her abilities and experience.

Di vos incolumes custodiant,

Flavius Vedius Germanicus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25396 From: P. Minucia Tiberia Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Many Thanks
Salvete Civites Novae Romae:

I am truly touched by the degree of support I received
from the voting populace in this election. Although
there can only be one Censor Suffectus, and in this
case the electorial victor is Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Felix, I do not feel a sense of loss, that is for
sure. Rather, I am honoured that, despite past
mistakes, you are willing to evaluate the positive
things as well as the negative, and place your
confidence in me to serve you as Censor.

I was a little teary, to be honest, after I read the
Comitia Centuriata results (I am sometimes a
sentimental, passionate suck, admittedly)..not because
I lost the election, because of the show of support
for yours truly.


As all of you are aware, I tend to offer advice,
advocacy and my opinion :) on matters of weighted
importance to the Republic, whether or not I am in an
official position at any given time. This, of course,
I shall continue to do as a interested citizen, former
magistrate, advocate for religious freedoms (like the
Religio) and friend. One can always offer an opinion,
to be entertained by the appropriate authority, nonne?

I shall continue to enjoy the company of some of you
through the enjoyable work I do as Scribe for M.
Iulius Perusianus and Legatus to Propraetor Marcus
Darius Firmitus Canada Orientalis, plus relish the
companionship offered through the Sodalitates.

Again, my many heartfelt thanks and sincere
appreciation, quirites.

Valete,
P. Minucia Tiberia



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25397 From: Marcus Arminius Maior Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: New laws
Salvete


I uploaded two archives to the "files" section of this list:
"arqlex.doc", with 137 pages of all the laws of NR; and
"lexlist.doc", with an index of leges with basic statistics.


Vale
M.Arminius
Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25398 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-07-02
Subject: Congratulations Sulla
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@c...> wrote:

> In the contest for Censor, Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix was the
>choice of 25 centuries. Pompeia Minucia-Tiberia Strabo was the
>choice of 18 centuries. 43 Centuries cast votes. There were eight
>centuries in which no vote was cast. Therefore the number of
>centuries required for a majority was 22. Lucius Cornelius Sulla
>Felix obtained a majority of centuries in the first round, and is
>elected Censor suffectus, to serve as such until the end of this
>year.
>
> Congratulations to Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, and my thanks to
>both candidates for being willing to step forward to serve.

Congratulations to Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix for his victory in
this election. The voters chose wisely.

Valete,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25399 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: Voting Results from the Comitia Centuriata
Avete Omnes,

As I prepare this email and my accompanying Oath of office I would like to say a few words. First, thank you citizens who exercised your rights in voting without your support Nova Roma would flounder in its mission. Secondly, thank you to my supporters. I appreciate your confidence and will do my best not to let you down. Finally, I would like to thank my opponent for a well fought election.

I, Robert Woolwine (Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix)do hereby solemnly swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Robert Woolwine (Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix) swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Robert Woolwine (Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix) swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Robert Woolwine (Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix) swear to protect and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Robert Woolwine (Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix) further swear to fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of Censor to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept the position of Censor and all the rights, privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.

Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix

----- Original Message -----
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com ; NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com ; mediatlanticaprovincia@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 3:20 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Voting Results from the Comitia Centuriata


Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Quiritibus Salutem Plurimam Dicit:

Chief Rogator Cordus has reported the results of the voting in the
Comitia Centuriata.


In the contest for Censor, Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix was the choice
of 25 centuries. Pompeia Minucia-Tiberia Strabo was the choice of 18
centuries. 43 Centuries cast votes. There were eight centuries in which
no vote was cast. Therefore the number of centuries required for a
majority was 22. Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix obtained a majority of
centuries in the first round, and is elected Censor suffectus, to serve
as such until the end of this year.

Congratulations to Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, and my thanks to both
candidates for being willing to step forward to serve.


The Lex Equitia Galeria de Ordinariis has been approved by the Comitia
Centuriata. 37 centuries voted to approve, 5 centuries voted against
approval, and nine centuries abstained. Having now been approved by the
Comitia Centuriata and by the Senate, the Lex Equitia Galeria de
Ordinariis amends the Constitution of Nova Roma.

My thanks to Tribune Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for his great help in
the drafting of this law. It provides us with the means to address a
difficult problem.

Valete Quirites,

Gn. Equitius Marinus
Consul


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25400 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: Voting Results from the Comitia Centuriata
C. Popillius Laenas L. Cornelius Sulla Felix salutem dicit

Congratulations mi amice!

Vale bene
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25401 From: FAC Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: Scipio, Strabo and the Censorship
Salve Senator Drusus,

> Actually I'm rather fond of the Roman art of Satire

Oh, well, I love roman Satire. Flaccus wrote "Satura tota nostra
est" refferring to the italian ability to be so satirical.
However honestly I think several people talking here are close to
the Satire like you are close to the moon on the sky.

> No Badges or hats, you just get to show selective outrage when the
> "wrong" person disagrees with the politicaly correct viewpoint.

You are very expert of requirements and skills of this strange Nova
Roman Police. I would suppose that you're a sort of director or
talent scout. ;-)
Please, inform us when the recruitment campaign for the NR Police
Academy start. Many people could be interesting...

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25402 From: FAC Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: Many Thanks
Salvete Pompeia et Omnes,
while I'm sending my congratulations to the new elected Censor
Suffectus, I would thank you too for your efforts and job for Nova
Roman Res Publica. I think your services and advises are ever
precious and I would invite you continue in this way and try again
to candidate yourself.
The people could critice and attack you, but the most important
thing is the strong convinction to do the best for interests of the
Res Publica and of the citizens.
Good luck, Amica!

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "P. Minucia Tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@y...> wrote:
> Salvete Civites Novae Romae:
>
> I am truly touched by the degree of support I received
> from the voting populace in this election. Although
> there can only be one Censor Suffectus, and in this
> case the electorial victor is Lucius Cornelius Sulla
> Felix, I do not feel a sense of loss, that is for
> sure. Rather, I am honoured that, despite past
> mistakes, you are willing to evaluate the positive
> things as well as the negative, and place your
> confidence in me to serve you as Censor.
>
> I was a little teary, to be honest, after I read the
> Comitia Centuriata results (I am sometimes a
> sentimental, passionate suck, admittedly)..not because
> I lost the election, because of the show of support
> for yours truly.
>
>
> As all of you are aware, I tend to offer advice,
> advocacy and my opinion :) on matters of weighted
> importance to the Republic, whether or not I am in an
> official position at any given time. This, of course,
> I shall continue to do as a interested citizen, former
> magistrate, advocate for religious freedoms (like the
> Religio) and friend. One can always offer an opinion,
> to be entertained by the appropriate authority, nonne?
>
> I shall continue to enjoy the company of some of you
> through the enjoyable work I do as Scribe for M.
> Iulius Perusianus and Legatus to Propraetor Marcus
> Darius Firmitus Canada Orientalis, plus relish the
> companionship offered through the Sodalitates.
>
> Again, my many heartfelt thanks and sincere
> appreciation, quirites.
>
> Valete,
> P. Minucia Tiberia
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25403 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Edictum Pro Praetore: Ludis Apollinaribus
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Quiritibus Salutem Plurimam Dicit:

EDICTUM CONSULARE PRO PRAETORE DE LUDIS APOLLINARIBUS

I. In the absence of the Praetor Urbanus I subsume within my consular
imperium the authority to set the dates and activities of the Ludi
Apollinares in accordance with the mos maiorum.

II. In accordance with the mos maiorum the Ludi Apollinares shall be
observed from pridie Nonas Sextilis (July 6) to ante diem III Idus
Sextilis (July 13).

III. I delegate responsibility for conducting the Ludi Apollinares
to Aedilis Curulis, Flamen Quirinalis, and Pontifex G. Iulius Scaurus.

IV. Ludi circenses shall be held in connection with the Ludi
Apollinares under the rules promulgated by the Edictum Aedilis copied
below. Any entrant who wishes to participate in the Ludi
Circenses must send a subscription to G. Vipsanius Agrippa at
canadaoccidentalis@... by 00:01 Roman time on ante diem VI Idus
Sextilis (July 10). Subscriptions are open from the publication of
this edictum. Each subscription must bear the subject header "Ludi
Circenses" and comply with the instructions and rules set forth in the
Edictum Aedilicium de Ratione Ludorum Circensum appended below.

V. This edictum shall take effect immediately.

Given on Kalendas Sextilis in the consulship of Cn. Salix Astur and
Gn. Equitius Marinus.

Gn. Equitius Marinus
Consul
_________________________________________

EDICTUM AEDILIS DE RATIONE LUDORUM CIRCENSUM

I. Any Nova Roman citizen or socius who is not under Aedilician
sanction may take part in the Ludi Circenses organised by the Aediles
Curules. Each citizen may enter no more than one chariot per ludi.

II. An entrant who wishes to participate in the Ludi Circenses must
send a subscription to G. Vipsanius Agrippa at canadaoccidentalis@...
no less than one week prior to the commencement of the ludi unless
otherwise specified by edictum. Each subscription must bear the
subject header "Ludi Circenses" and include the following information:

A. His/her name in Nova Roma;

B. The name of his/her driver;

C. The name of his/her chariot;

D. His/her tactics for the Quarter and Semifinals;

E. His/her tactics for the Finals;

F. The name of his/her "factio" or team (Albata, Praesina, Russata, or
Veneta);

G. Dirty actions against another factio in a specific round
(quarter-final, semi-final, or final) and amount of sesterces paid in
support of it (an entrant does not have to pay sesterces to
commission a dirty action, but doing so increases the chances of success);

H. Defence against dirty actions in a specific round (quarter-final,
semi-final, or final) and amount of sesterces paid in support of it
(an entrant does not have to pay sesterces to defend against a dirty
action, but doing so decreases the chances of success of the dirty action);

I. If sesterces from multiple entrants are pooled to take a dirty
action or defend against a dirty action, the subscription of each
entrant of the pool must so indicate.

III. Tactics: Six (6) race tactics are possible:

A. To hurry in the last laps

B. To pass the curves closely the "spina" of the circus.

C. To support a constant pace

D. To lash the rivals

E. To push the rivals to the wall of the circus

F. To hurry in the straight lines

IV. Dirty actions.

A. An entrant can try the assassination of the driver of a rival
factio or the sabotage of his/her chariot.

1. Assassination of the driver of a rival factio. The entrant must
specify which factio he/she attacks. The base chance of success is 30
%. If the attempt fails it is is discovered and the name of the entrant
who commissioned the assassination and those who contributed sesterces
in support of the assassination will be announced and subject to
disciplinary action by the Aediles Curules. Such disciplinary action
may include disqualification from the current ludi, banning from future
ludi for a specified period of time, or banning from participation in
the ludi for the remainder of the year. The decision of the Aediles
Curules in such matters is final. If the attempt is successful, the
player with the murdered driver cannot take part in the race and the
murderer remains undiscovered.

2. Sabotage of a chariot. The entrant must specify which factio he/she
attacks. The base chance is 45 %. If the attempt is unsuccessful, it
is discovered and the name of the entrant who commissioned the
assassination and those who contributed sesterces in support of the
sabotage will be announced and subject to disciplinary action by the
Aediles Curules. Such disciplinary action may include disqualification
from the current ludi, banning from future ludi for a specified period
of time, or banning from participation in the ludi for the remainder
of the year. The decision of the Aediles Curules in such matters is
final. If the attempt is successful, the player with the broken chariot
will have an accident in the race.

B. Defence against and support for dirty actions. Each entrant shall
receive one hundred sesterces for each ludi. These sesterces may be
used in any round of any race, accumulated from race to race, or
accumulated from other entertainments (e.g., official-sponsored wagering
on munera). These sesterces are not redeemable in Nova Roman or any
other currency and may not be used outside the ways specified in this
edictum. The Aediles Curules shall record the number of sesterces held
and expended by each entrant and their computations shall be final and
unappealable. The sesterces may be expended in any of the following ways:

1. Application of one hundred sesterces by any entrant to defence of
his/her driver and chariot will render the driver and chariot immune
for one round in the ludi;

2. Entrants from the same factio may pool their sesterces for defence
in a round; for every one hundred sesterces pooled, the chance of
success of a dirty action against that factio is reduced by 5% in that
round.

3. Entrants may pool their sesterces for offence in a round; for every
one hundred sesterces pooled, the chance of success of a dirty action
against the targeted factio is increased by 5% in that round.

V. Organisation of Competition.

A. There will be three rounds to each competition: quarter, semi-
finals, and final.

B. The competition will be for elimination in each round. Every race
will involve no more than four entrants.

C. In the Quarter rounds there will be one entrant from each factio in
each race, unless there are too few entrants from a factio to make
this possible. The first two first place entrants shall advance to the
semi-final round; the remaining two entrants will be eliminated.

D. In the Semifinal round the winners of the Quarter rounds shall
compete. The winning entrants of the Semi-final rounds shall advance
to the final.

E. In the Final round the four best players race; the first place
entrant shall be the winner of the ludi.

VI. Computation of victory.

A. Accidents.

1. Before doing the calculations of a race, the Aediles Curules
determine who has an accident. For it, they roll one dice 0-100 for
every chariot. The resultant number will be its percentage of
accident:

- The drivers with tactics 1 will have 0 to 15 percentage of accident
always. 0 to 25 if there are one or more drivers with tactics 4 or 5.

- The drivers with tactics 2 will have 0 to 20 percentage of accident
always. 0 to 35 if there are one or more drivers with tactics 4 or 5.

- The drivers with tactics 3 will have 0 to 10 percentage always.

- The drivers with tactics 4 will have 0 to 15 percentage always. 0 to
25 if there are other drivers with tactics 4.

- The drivers with tactics 5 will have 0 to 15 always. 0 to 25 if
there are other drivers with tactics 5.

- The drivers with tactics 6 will have 0 to 5 percentage always. 0 to
20 if there are other drivers with tactics 4 or 5.

B. Calculation of the races.

1. The Aediles Curules shall determine whether any dirty actions are
successful. If a dirty action is determined to be successful, a
chariot shall be eliminated by lot from among the entrants of the
targeted factio and either declare the driver assassinated or that an
accident caused by sabotage has occurred.

2. After determining which chariots (if any) have been eliminated
from a race due to an accident, the Aediles Curules must calculate the
order in which the remaining teams finished the race.

3. The Aediles Curules will roll one die 0-10 for every entrant. This
will be the Value of Race (VR) of every car.

4. To know the final position of a chariot in the race the VR of every
player is divided by the sum of all the VR and the result is
multiplied by 50. This establishes each entrant's Chance to Win (CW).
For example, if there is a race with 4 chariots with these VR: 6,5,4,2
then the first chariot, with the VR 6, would have the following Chance
to to Win:
6/17
(17 is the sum of 6+5+4+2) x 50 = 17.6 (rounding, 18). The CW of the
first chariot will be 18 points. The second chariot, with VR 5, would
have 5/17x50 = 14.7 (rounding, 15), therefore its CW is 15 points.

5. The tactics modify the CW of the following way:

Tactics 1) +6 points.

Tactics 2) +8 points.

Tactics 3) No points. The tactics 4 and 5 do not affect it.

Tactics 4) +2 points. The tactics 5 do not affect it.

Tactics 5) +2 points. The tactics 4 do not affect it.

Tactics 6) +4 points.

For example, the Aediles Curules assign each entrant a specific range
of numbers out of a series of 100 that is equal to the entrant's Chance
to Win. They assign these team ranges consecutively. In our sample race,
for example, Chariot 1's range (with tactics 2) would be 01 through 25
(18+7). Chariot 2's range (with tactics 4) would be 26 through 40.

6. In the final step the Aediles Curules will roll a die 0-100 to
determine the order of finish. The chariot within whose range the
first dice 0-100 roll falls is the team that finishes the race in first
place. The chariot within whose range the second dice 0-100 roll falls
is the team that finishes the race in second place. The chariot within
whose range the third D100 roll falls is the chariot that finishes the
race in third place, and so on. Once a chariot's position has been
determined, subsequent rolls that fall within its range are ignored and
the Aediles Curules roll again.

VII. Automatic computation of results by computer in accordance with
the rules established herein is permitted.

VIII. This edictum takes effect immediately.

Given on ante diem V Idus Martii in the consulship of Cn. Salix Astur
and Gn. Equitius Marinus.

G. Iulius Scaurus, Aedilis Curulis and M. Iulius Perusianus, Aedilis
Curulis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25404 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: Rosa Equitia
Salvete Quirites,

Lucius Equitius wrote:

> I'm pleased to announce the newest member of Gens Equitia.
>
> Rosa Equitia filiae Seia Silvania Atia Iunonis Templi Sacerdotes

This is wonderful news. May Rosa Equitia grow up happy and strong and
wise in the Pace Deorum, and may her parents enjoy the deep satisfaction
of watching her grow.

Valete,

Gn. Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25405 From: M.Traianus Valerius Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Congratulations Sulla
Salve!

I would also like to extend my congratulations to Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix for his victory in this election.


Ita di deaque faxint!
M. Traianus Valerius
------------------------------------------------------------
Gens Traiana Home Page
www.geocities.com/genstraiana

----- Original Message -----
From: deciusiunius
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 8:58 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Congratulations Sulla


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@c...> wrote:

> In the contest for Censor, Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix was the
>choice of 25 centuries. Pompeia Minucia-Tiberia Strabo was the
>choice of 18 centuries. 43 Centuries cast votes. There were eight
>centuries in which no vote was cast. Therefore the number of
>centuries required for a majority was 22. Lucius Cornelius Sulla
>Felix obtained a majority of centuries in the first round, and is
>elected Censor suffectus, to serve as such until the end of this
>year.
>
> Congratulations to Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, and my thanks to
>both candidates for being willing to step forward to serve.

Congratulations to Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix for his victory in
this election. The voters chose wisely.

Valete,

Palladius


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25406 From: Seia Silvania Atia Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: Rosa Equitia
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Equitius" <vergil96@c...>
wrote:
> L Equitius Cincinnatus Augur Quiritibus salutem dicit
>
> Salvete
>
> I'm pleased to announce the newest member of Gens Equitia.
>
> Rosa Equitia filiae Seia Silvania Atia Iunonis Templi Sacerdotes
>
> Atia, please remember to send along the proper application to
Censores so
> that she may be properly enrolled as a citizen.
>

Thank you, Pater. Is it the same application as any new member?



> > I'm sorry to hear that you have loose screws (sorry, couldn't
help myself
> > LOL)
>
> L Equitius: Got me fair and square ;-)
>


Sometimes when the door is opened one cannot help but walk through
it <G>


> > > Anyway, it's plain that Rose should be Rosa Equitia (doh, what
was I
> > >thinking?).
> > >
> >
> > PERFECT!!!! Now as the proud grandPater could you announce it,
please
> > <G>
>
> L Equitius: Indeed, I am proud.
>

You HAVE seen the pictures, haven't you? <G>


> If NovaRoma has done nothing else it has allowed me to meet great
people and
> make new friends. Think of your friends when you become
despondent, truely
> one is rich who as many friends and a loving family.
>

We have found this out <G>.

Incidently we are moving again. I don't know the statute, although
I am going to find out. I may get those sacred geese yet!

Pax,
Crys/Atia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25407 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: Edictum Pro Praetore: Ludis Apollinaribus
Salvete Consul Marinus et Omnes:

(text snipped for Brevity)

Great! This is great. Kudos! I was thinking about this Ludi a while
back myself.... Paramount in antiquita and very specific indeed to the
office of Praetor. Apollo is a deity of many names, and was as such
in antiquita... he was known by many different cultures, many persons
from which would be attending these games.

It behooves us to hold this feast, and I'm glad these games will
commence NR this year, despite the Praetor's office being limited in
manpower hours, and your own schedule Consul, I'm sure, having a limit
of untaxed hours.

Valete,
Pompeia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25408 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: Edictum Pro Praetore: Ludis Apollinaribus
Salvete Quirites,

pompeia_minucia_tiberia wrote:

> Great! This is great. Kudos!

All thanks are due to Curule Aedile Iulius Scaurus, who brought the
matter to my attention and who is willing to manage the Ludi.

> It behooves us to hold this feast, and I'm glad these games will
> commence NR this year, despite the Praetor's office being limited in
> manpower hours, and your own schedule Consul, I'm sure, having a limit
> of untaxed hours.

Indeed. It has been a bit busy for me of late.

Valete Quirites,

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25409 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: Edictum Pro Praetore: Ludis Apollinaribus
---Salvete Consul et Omnes:

Well, credit where it is due, for sure. Thanks to Aediles Iulius
Scaurus for not letting this important feast fall through the cracks.

Valete,
Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Bill Gawne <gawne@c...> wrote:
> Salvete Quirites,
>
> pompeia_minucia_tiberia wrote:
>
> > Great! This is great. Kudos!
>
> All thanks are due to Curule Aedile Iulius Scaurus, who brought the
> matter to my attention and who is willing to manage the Ludi.
>
> > It behooves us to hold this feast, and I'm glad these games will
> > commence NR this year, despite the Praetor's office being limited in
> > manpower hours, and your own schedule Consul, I'm sure, having a limit
> > of untaxed hours.
>
> Indeed. It has been a bit busy for me of late.
>
> Valete Quirites,
>
> --
> Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25410 From: daniel villanueva Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: My resignation
Salvete omnes.

As my former colleagues already know, on July 1st,2004 I resigned my seat as Senator

Bene valete
Lucius Pompeius Octavianus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25411 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2004-07-03
Subject: Re: My resignation
Salvete Quirites, et salve Luci Pompei,

daniel villanueva wrote:

> Salvete omnes.
>
> As my former colleagues already know, on July 1st,2004 I resigned my
> seat as Senator

It is a sad loss for Nova Roma. Thank you for your service to the
Republic.

Vale,

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25412 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-07-04
Subject: Re: Roman Eagle?
Salve

Thanks for the information but you posted but you have misunderstood my question the type of Eagle i.e. Golden Eagle that is still found in the wild or another one not the color of the legions eagle.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Roman Eagle?


F. Galerius Aurelianus Tb. Galerio Paulino. Salve, cousin.

According to Webster and Connolly, during the Civil Wars and the early
Principate, the Eagles of the Legions were silver with gold accentuations. By the
reign of Claudius, the Eagles were gold. Eagles as a legio symbol were noted
as early as the Cataline War but this may be apocryphal. We know that Caesar's
legions in Gaul had eagles and Crassus had them in Persia. During the
greater part of the Republic when the maniple was the primary tactical unit, the
emblem was a hand with the maniple number below. These were usually silver and
bronze construction. The cohort became the primary tactical unit for both
legions and the auxiliary during the Civil Wars and this became standard by the
Principate. The maniple standard went out of use to be replaced by the cohort
standard, while centuries and other smaller formations separated from their
legion used the vexillari standard; which is similar to the Nova Roman flag.
There were also some cohorts that had some emblems in the shape of the
astrological sign of the formation. The Praetorian Guard cohorts used a scorpio; the
Sixth Legion had a capricorn. There were also gold and silver images of the
emperor and members of his family carried by imaginifers (I think that is what
they were called). Vale.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25413 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-07-04
Subject: Macronational Holiday
G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.

salvete, omnes.

To all those citizens who live in the macronational United States,
HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY! :-)

valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25414 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-04
Subject: Re: Macronational Holiday
Salvete Quirites, et salve Cato,

gaiusequitiuscato wrote:

> G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.
>
> salvete, omnes.
>
> To all those citizens who live in the macronational United States,
> HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY! :-)

Thank you. Happy Independence Day to you too, and to all who celebrate
the day.

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25415 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-07-04
Subject: Back Again, temporarily bumped from yahoo
Salvete omnes,

Seems while I was away at work yahoo shut my address down cause of
some bouncing problems. We didn't have internet access on this
project like I had thought we would so I missed this situation.
Anyway if anyone tried to send me mail and it was returned please
resend, I don't know what ails Yahoo sometimes.

Also a happy 4th Of July to all my American colleagues and friends
in NR!

Thanks!

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25416 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2004-07-04
Subject: Important Correction on Ludi Circenses for Ludi Apollonares
G. Iulius Scaurus S. P. D.

Salvete, Quirites.

I have been informed that the address for entrants into the ludi
circenses of the Ludi Apollinares is bouncing. Upon investigation I
have discovered that I buggered up when drafting the edictum consulare
on the games by not turning the auto-spell-checker function off, since
it it normalised @... to @.... The correct address for
submitting entries for the ludi circenses of the Ludi Apollinares is
canadaoccidentalis@.... I apologise for any confusion.

Valete.

Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25417 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2004-07-05
Subject: Family Traditions
Nova Romae S.P.D. Fl Vedius Germanicus

S.V.B.E.E.V.

I realize this has nothing to do with ancient Rome, and has little
relevance to those readers outside of the United States, but I
wanted to share a little tradition that we have instituted in my
family, and which does mean a lot to me.

I sat my 3-year-old daughter down with me, and we watched
the "America Rock" segment of "Schoolhouse Rock". For those who
don't know what that is, it's a collection of animated shorts...
musical numbers... dealing with various aspects of American history
and civics, focusing on the Revolution. We didn't just watch; we
danced, we sang together, and during it all I tried to teach why it
was important that she be a good citizen, and informed about how her
country worked, and its origin.

And, later, after my daughter was tucked away in her bed, my wife
and I watched the musical "1776", which deals with the writing of
the Declaration of Independence. It has a number of historical
flubs, but the spirit of the film still comes through.

My apologies and my thanks for indulging me in this reverie. Perhaps
some day I can extend this tradition, so that my daughter can find
this same experience in her second nationality; that as a Citizen of
Nova Roma.

Di vos incolumes custodiant,

Flavius Vedius Germanicus
Nova-Roman-American
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25418 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-05
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Ave,

Actually I think this has a great deal to do with ancient Rome,
because this is exactly the way Romans acted. Just as many Americans
hold up the Founding Fathers as models of civic and personal virtues
the Romans held earlier generations of Romans as models of civic and
personal virtue.

The story of Washington cutting down the Cherry tree is just the sort
of story that Romans told thier children to give them examples of how
they should act, and I can easily imigine a similar story where
Romulus or some other early Roman proclaims "I Can not tell a lie"
being told to Roman children 2000 years ago.

This fits in with a project that I have had in the back of my mind for
some time, but which I haven't had the time to do anything with. A
Children's collection of stories that feature tales of Ancient Romans,
ones that are intended to teach the Civic and Personal values of the
Romans. I Offer the idea up now in the hope that someone who has more
time than I do will be able to transform it into reality.

L. Sicinius Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Flavius Vedius Germanicus"
<germanicus@g...> wrote:
> Nova Romae S.P.D. Fl Vedius Germanicus
>
> S.V.B.E.E.V.
>
> I realize this has nothing to do with ancient Rome, and has little
> relevance to those readers outside of the United States, but I
> wanted to share a little tradition that we have instituted in my
> family, and which does mean a lot to me.
>
> I sat my 3-year-old daughter down with me, and we watched
> the "America Rock" segment of "Schoolhouse Rock". For those who
> don't know what that is, it's a collection of animated shorts...
> musical numbers... dealing with various aspects of American history
> and civics, focusing on the Revolution. We didn't just watch; we
> danced, we sang together, and during it all I tried to teach why it
> was important that she be a good citizen, and informed about how her
> country worked, and its origin.
>
> And, later, after my daughter was tucked away in her bed, my wife
> and I watched the musical "1776", which deals with the writing of
> the Declaration of Independence. It has a number of historical
> flubs, but the spirit of the film still comes through.
>
> My apologies and my thanks for indulging me in this reverie. Perhaps
> some day I can extend this tradition, so that my daughter can find
> this same experience in her second nationality; that as a Citizen of
> Nova Roma.
>
> Di vos incolumes custodiant,
>
> Flavius Vedius Germanicus
> Nova-Roman-American
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25419 From: sabina_equitia_doris Date: 2004-07-05
Subject: Re: Roman Eagle?
Salve!

As a simple ornithophile, I would suggest that the bird you are
inquiring about would be the Aquila Heliaca, still found in Europe,
and commonly called the Imperial Eagle.

Here is a link to some general information

:http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Aqui
la_heliaca.html

or put "aquila heliaca" into a search bar for more sources.

--Sabina Equitia Doris



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@m...>
wrote:
> Salve
>
>
> Was the Roman Eagle a Golden Eagle that is still found or another
one?
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25420 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2004-07-05
Subject: Re: Damanhur Community N. Italia...
Avete omnes,

Damanhur has a Yahoo English language group called
damanhurusa and there is a regukar Damanhur journal posting.
I have been following them for a long time because I have
had ideas about joining. However, most still need to earn
money from outside and it is not a truly ashram or
labour-based coinage kind of economy like Local Trading
Schemes. There are things I have doubts about, time travel
to Atlantis being the biggest of all, but I am prepared to
believe in an archetypal 'Atlantis experience' buried deep
in the subconscious & not to be taken at face value. Falco
gives regular homilies. The obvious comparison was with
Scientology (for a good read, 'Barefaced Messiah' gives L.
Ron Hubbard's quite mad biography). However, many years ago
I filled a form in for more info about scientology and was
glad I did because even one of their monthly newsletter
(they were harder to get rid of than Athlete's Foot) read
like very bad science fiction (shades of HP
Lovecraft+Heinlein - just Hubbard's pulp SF presented as
'religio-science').
Damanhur doesn't come across that way at all and even if
some of it is new-agey, it is mostly on the plausible side.
I don't know whether Earth currents meet there are not but I
do credit their Cathedrals and I see no reason why currents
should not exist and meet there. I do believe that when the
present society finishes crumbling - and who knows, perhaps
there is more than just economic/social change to come -
they will be there to build part of the new world. They and
perhaps other more Green local communities and economies
scattered round the world.

Caesariensis.
> AVE FRANCISCE APVLE CAESAR TRIBVNE
>
> [snip]
>
> Yes. Damanhur is that. Of course, they had a lot of money
> to build all of that. We would need too... :-)
>
> BENE VALE
> M'Con.Serapio
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> --------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up
> ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker.
> Get it for free!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/wWQplB/TM
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> ----------~->
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25421 From: hucke@cynico.net Date: 2004-07-05
Subject: Re: Approved document
Please read the attached file.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25422 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2004-07-05
Subject: De absentia
Salvete, citizens, magistrates and colleagues,

I´ll depart right now, for a week outside on job travel and problably without net acess. I will come back in 12th July.

Valete bene in pacem deorum,

L. Arminius Faustus TRP




---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail agora ainda melhor: 100MB, anti-spam e antivírus grátis!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25423 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2004-07-05
Subject: Chat room
Salvete


I am available in the chat room, for the next three
hours.


Vale
M.Arminius Maior
Praetor





_______________________________________________________
Yahoo! Mail agora com 100MB, anti-spam e antivírus grátis!
http://br.info.mail.yahoo.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25424 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2004-07-05
Subject: Re: Chat room
I'm here! But no sign of anyone else.

FVG

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M Arminius Maior <marminius@y...>
wrote:
> Salvete
>
>
> I am available in the chat room, for the next three
> hours.
>
>
> Vale
> M.Arminius Maior
> Praetor
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail agora com 100MB, anti-spam e antivírus grátis!
> http://br.info.mail.yahoo.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25425 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Professor chases Roman-era pirate ships
From
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/science/07/05/bc.na.gen.us.piratesoft.ap
/index.html

When the Roman Empire got tired of pirates terrorizing shipping
lanes and nearly bringing the known world's trade to a halt, it went
after them hard.

Roman general Pompey reportedly took just 40 days to locate and wipe
out the ships and crews that were preying on shipping. It has taken
much, much longer for modern scientists to again find the pirates of
the eastern Mediterranean.

Cheryl Ward, an anthropology professor at Florida State University,
hopes she's on the verge of locating some of the pirate ships that
were a thorn in the side of the Romans 2,100 years ago.

Finding one or more them may help provide a unique window into what
the larger world looked like at the time.

Ward is the main investigator in a major archaeological mission that
will be trying this month to find evidence of the ships in the
shallow water off the southern coast of Turkey.

The dream would be to actually locate one of their vessels, known as
hemioliae -- rowed ships that were the terror of the 1st century.
Researchers know what they look like from Roman descriptions, but
none have ever been found.

Ward and her colleagues hope to paint a picture of a different class
of people who contrasted with the well known images of the Roman
Empire, about which much is already known. That knowledge comes from
what the educated, wealthy Romans left in written records and
artifacts.

The pirates were the underclass.

"These were a bunch of unemployed guys," Ward said Friday, preparing
to leave for Turkey. "They turned to piracy. It was easy money.

"What's the story of these people from what they left behind?"

First, her team has to find some remnants of their lives. "We would
love to find a shipyard," she said.

Ward will be exploring nearshore areas along the Turkish coast that
used to be dry before erosion pushed back the shore. But she said
she'd settle for parts of just one ship.

Pompey had 120,000 men and 270 ships looking for pirates. Ward has a
few graduate students and some fellow researchers from a Turkish
university.

But the pirate project has become a big topic in the archaeological
world and her work is part of a larger project. Researchers working
on land also are studying the area of Turkey known as Cilicia --
where many pirates were based.

Aside from the prospect of finding museum artifacts from the Roman
era, Ward said contemporary man can learn a lot by studying
societies of the past.

"Archaeology is telling the story of environmental degradation, of
the collapse of civilizations, of the rise of ... new practices,"
Ward said.

And there may be parallels to today's global relations, said
Meredith Marten, a graduate student working with Ward.

"If you can see how these people were subordinated or just kind of
kept on the periphery, you can understand why these people would
take such drastic measures," Marten said.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25426 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Chat room
Salve


How can it be? Im at:
http://www.novaroma.org/bin/chat/chat


Vale
M.Arminius

--- Flavius Vedius Germanicus
<germanicus@...> escreveu: > I'm here!
But no sign of anyone else.
>
> FVG
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M Arminius Maior
> <marminius@y...>
> wrote:
> > Salvete
> >
> >
> > I am available in the chat room, for the next
> three
> > hours.
> >
> >
> > Vale
> > M.Arminius Maior
> > Praetor
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
_______________________________________________________
> > Yahoo! Mail agora com 100MB, anti-spam e antivírus
> grátis!
> > http://br.info.mail.yahoo.com/
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> --------------------~-->
> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion
> Toolbar.
> Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
>
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/wWQplB/TM
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>





_______________________________________________________
Yahoo! Mail agora com 100MB, anti-spam e antivírus grátis!
http://br.info.mail.yahoo.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25427 From: Marcus Traianus Valerius Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
The Honorable L. Sicinius Drusus Wrote:

"This fits in with a project that I have had in the back of my mind for
some time, but which I haven't had the time to do anything with. A Children's collection of stories that feature tales of Ancient Romans, ones that are intended to teach the Civic and Personal values of the Romans. I Offer the idea up now in the hope that someone who has more time than I do will be able to transform it into reality."

MTV: That is a fantastic idea. I am not sure I have the spare time nessessary but if I can assist in any way please let me know.


Ita di deaque faxint!
Marcus Traianus Valerius

------------------------------------------------------------
Gens Traiana Home Page
www.geocities.com/genstraiana

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25428 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
The Starting point would be deciding which Tales of Roman virtue would
be in the Collection.

I Would start the list with Cincinnatus doing his duty and giving up
power as soon as the crisis was over and Horatius stand on the bridge.

L. Sicinius Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Marcus Traianus Valerius"
<genstraiana@y...> wrote:
> The Honorable L. Sicinius Drusus Wrote:
>
> "This fits in with a project that I have had in the back of my mind for
> some time, but which I haven't had the time to do anything with. A
Children's collection of stories that feature tales of Ancient Romans,
ones that are intended to teach the Civic and Personal values of the
Romans. I Offer the idea up now in the hope that someone who has more
time than I do will be able to transform it into reality."
>
> MTV: That is a fantastic idea. I am not sure I have the spare time
nessessary but if I can assist in any way please let me know.
>
>
> Ita di deaque faxint!
> Marcus Traianus Valerius
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Gens Traiana Home Page
> www.geocities.com/genstraiana
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25429 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Salvete omnes, et salve Luci Sicini,

Lucius Sicinius Drusus wrote:

> The Starting point would be deciding which Tales of Roman virtue would
> be in the Collection.
>
> I Would start the list with Cincinnatus doing his duty and giving up
> power as soon as the crisis was over and Horatius stand on the bridge.

Excellent choices, both. There's also a wonderful story related by
Colleen McCullough in, I think, "The First Man In Rome," about a
consular who was sent to Egypt to stop an invasion by Syrians. He
walked out to meet them, with only his proconsular lictors behind him.
When they came upon the Syrian army, he called for the king, and told
him to turn around and go home. The King laughed at him, but the old
consular took his staff and drew a circle around the King's feet,
telling him that when he stepped out of that circle, it would be to go
home, or else he would be calling down the entire might of Rome against him.

The king turned around and went home.

It'w a wonderful story, and exactly the sort I think you should have in
this collection.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25430 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Ave,

That would be Laenas. Another good one would be the loyality shown by
Mucius when he allowed his right hand to be burned away rather than
betray the Romans.

L. Sicinius Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@c...>
wrote:
> Salvete omnes, et salve Luci Sicini,
>
> Lucius Sicinius Drusus wrote:
>
> > The Starting point would be deciding which Tales of Roman virtue would
> > be in the Collection.
> >
> > I Would start the list with Cincinnatus doing his duty and giving up
> > power as soon as the crisis was over and Horatius stand on the bridge.
>
> Excellent choices, both. There's also a wonderful story related by
> Colleen McCullough in, I think, "The First Man In Rome," about a
> consular who was sent to Egypt to stop an invasion by Syrians. He
> walked out to meet them, with only his proconsular lictors behind him.
> When they came upon the Syrian army, he called for the king, and told
> him to turn around and go home. The King laughed at him, but the old
> consular took his staff and drew a circle around the King's feet,
> telling him that when he stepped out of that circle, it would be to go
> home, or else he would be calling down the entire might of Rome
against him.
>
> The king turned around and went home.
>
> It'w a wonderful story, and exactly the sort I think you should have in
> this collection.
>
> Vale,
>
> -- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25431 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Salvete,

That Consular would have been..."da-ta-ta-da!"....

none other than Gaius Popillius Laenas.

Valete,

Gaius Popillius Laenas


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@c...> wrote:
> Salvete omnes, et salve Luci Sicini,
>
> Lucius Sicinius Drusus wrote:
>
> > The Starting point would be deciding which Tales of Roman virtue
would
> > be in the Collection.
> >
> > I Would start the list with Cincinnatus doing his duty and
giving up
> > power as soon as the crisis was over and Horatius stand on the
bridge.
>
> Excellent choices, both. There's also a wonderful story related
by
> Colleen McCullough in, I think, "The First Man In Rome," about a
> consular who was sent to Egypt to stop an invasion by Syrians. He
> walked out to meet them, with only his proconsular lictors behind
him.
> When they came upon the Syrian army, he called for the king, and
told
> him to turn around and go home. The King laughed at him, but the
old
> consular took his staff and drew a circle around the King's feet,
> telling him that when he stepped out of that circle, it would be
to go
> home, or else he would be calling down the entire might of Rome
against him.
>
> The king turned around and went home.
>
> It'w a wonderful story, and exactly the sort I think you should
have in
> this collection.
>
> Vale,
>
> -- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25432 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Salve Gai Popilli,

Heck of a namesake you chose. I love that story.

-- Marinus

gaiuspopilliuslaenas wrote:

> Salvete,
>
> That Consular would have been..."da-ta-ta-da!"....
>
> none other than Gaius Popillius Laenas.
>
> Valete,
>
> Gaius Popillius Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25433 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Report of the First Lectisternium of the Ludi Apollinares
G. Iulius Scaurus S. P. D.

Salvete, Quirites.

Today is the first day of the Ludi Apollinares. It was traditional to
begin the ludi with a lectisternium, a formal meal offered to specific
deities -- in this case Apollo Medicus, Latona, Diana, Hercules
Salutaris, Mercurius, and Neptunus, and to perform a lectisternium on
each succeeding day of the ludi in order to avert plague and
pestilence. For those who are unable to offer a lectisternium, I
recommend that offerings of wine and food be made to each of these
deities at the conclusion of the main meal of the day. I have performed
today the first lectisternium ofthe Ludi Apollinares.

I arrayed images of Apollo Medicus, Latona, Diana, Hercules Salutaris,
Mercurius, and Neptunus around the altar. I bathed in preparation,
then, garbed in toga praetexta, in ritu Graeco my head wreathed in
laurel, I lit the fire on the altar, then withdrew to begin the pompa.
I bore the secespita first, then the aqua lustralis, then incense, then
the mola salsa and cakes of offering, and finally the sacrifical victim,
a hen, the around the altar, tethering the victim at its base, and
concluding with the formula, "Procul, O procul, este profani [Be far, O
far away, that which profanes]". I drew a flaming brand from the fire,
and extinguished it in the aqua lustralis, creating aqua igne sacra
inflammata. I dipped the aspergillum in the aqua lustralis and
lustrated myself, the altar, and the victim, then invoked the formula,
"Favete linguis [Hold you tongues]." I then began the praefatio.

Praefatio

"Iane pater, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces precor, uti sies volens
propitius mihi et Senatui Populoque Novoromanorum Quiritum [Father
Ianus, by offering this incense to you I pray good prayers, so that you
may be propitious to me and the Senate and People of the Nova Romans,
the Quirites." I placed incense in the focus of the altar.

"Iuppiter Optime Maxime, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces precor, uti
sies volens propitius mihi et Senatui Populoque Novaromanorum Quiritum
[Iuppiter Best and Greatest, by offering this incense to you I pray good
prayers, so that you may be propitious to me and the Senate and People
of the Nova Romans, the Quirites." I placed incense in the focus of the
altar.

"Iuno dea, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces precor, uti sies volens
propitia mihi et Senatui Populoque Novaromanorum Quiritum [Goddess Iuno,
by offering this incense to you I pray good prayers, so that you may be
propitious to me and the Senate and People of the Nova Romans, the
Quirites." I placed incense in the focus of the altar.

"Minerva dea, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces precor, uti sies volens
propitia mihi et Senatui Populoque Novaromanorum Quiritum [Goddess
Minerva, by offering this incense to you I pray good prayers, so that
you may be propitious to me and the Senate and People of the Nova
Romans, the Quirites." I placed incense in the focus of the altar.

"Mars pater, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces precor, uti sies volens
propitius mihi et Senatui Populoque Novaromanorum Quiritum [Father Mars,
by offering this incense to you I pray good prayers, so that you may be
propitious to me and the Senate and People of the Nova Romans, the
Quirites.]" I placed incense in the focus of the altar.

"Quirine pater, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces precor, uti sies
volens propitius mihi et Senatui Populoque Novaromanorum Quiritum
[Father Quirinus, by offering this incense to you I pray good prayers,
so that you may be propitious to me and the Senate and People of the
Nova Romans, the Quirites.]" I placed incense in the focus of the altar.

"Iane pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Father Ianus, as by offering
to you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the sake of
this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation on the focus
of the altar.

"Iuppiter Optime Maxime, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene
precatus sum, eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Iuppiter Best
and Greatest, as by offering to you the incense virtuous prayers were
well prayed, for the sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I
poured a libation on the focus of the altar.

"Iuno dea, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum, eiusdem
rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Goddess Iuno, as by offering to you
the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the sake of this be
honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation on the focus of the
altar.

"Minerva dea, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Goddess Minerva, as by
offering to you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the
sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation on
the focus of the altar.

"Mars pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Father Mars, as by offering to
you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the sake of this
be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation on the focus of
the altar.

"Quirine pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Father Quirinus, as by
offering to you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the
sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation on
the focus of the altar.

I washed my hands in preparation for the praecatio.

Precatio

"Apollo Medice, dispellator pestilentiae et auxilium patrum nostrorum
Quiritum in tempore pestis et nunc nostrum Novaromanorum Quiritum, tibi
fieri oportet culignam vini dapi, eius rei ergo hac illace dape
pollucenda esto [Apollo Medicus, dispeller of pestilence and help of our
fathers, the Quirites, in time of plague and now of us, the Novaromans,
the Quirites, to you it is proper for a cup of wine to be given, for the
sake of this thing may you be honoured by this feast offering]." I
poured a libation on the focus of the altar.

"Latona mater, quae Medicum spem salutis Senatus Populique Novaromanorum
Quiritum prodidit, tibi fieri oportet culignam vini dapi, eius rei ergo
hac illace dape pollucenda esto [Mother Latona, who brought forth the
Healer, the hope of the health of the Senate and People of the
Novaromans, the Quirites, to you it is proper for a cup of wine to be
given, for the sake of this thing may you be honoured by this feast
offering]." I poured a libation on the focus of the altar.

"Diana dea, soror Medici et praeses silvarum salutarium, tibi fieri
oportet culignam vini dapi, eius rei ergo hac illace dape pollucenda
esto [Goddess Diana, sister of the Healer and protectress of the healing
woodlands, to you it is proper for a cup of wine to be given, for the
sake of this thing may you be honoured by this feast offering]." I
poured a libation on the focus of the altar.

"Hercules Salutaris, qui hominibus curam corporis docet, tibi fieri
oportet culignam vini dapi, eius rei ergo hac illace dape pollucenda
esto [Healing Hercules, who teaches care of the body to men, to you it
is proper for a cup of wine to be given, for the sake of this thing may
you be honoured by this feast offering]." I poured a libation on the
focus of the altar. Again I washed my hands in preparation for the redditio.

"Mercuri domine ventorum, qui ventis halitum noxium terrae pestilentiae
dispellit, tibi fieri oportet culignam vini dapi, eius rei ergo hac
illace dape pullucenda esto [Mercurius, lord of the winds, who dispells
the pestiletnial miasma with the winds, to you it is proper for a cup of
wine to be given, for the sake of this thing may you be honoured by this
feast offering]." I poured a libation on the focus of the altar.

"Neptune pater, qui halitum noxius pestilentiae in terra tenet, tibi
fieri oportet culignam vini dapi, eius rei ergo hac illace dape
pullucenda esto [Father Neptunus, who holds the pestilential miasma
within the earth, to you it is proper for a cup of wine to be given, for
the sake of this thing may you be honoured by this feast offering]." I
poured a libation on the focus of the altar.

Immolatio

I sprinkled the head of the victim with mola salsa, poured three drops
of water on her head, then cut three feathers from the top of her head
with the suscepita and placed them in the focus of the altar. The hen
showed no distress. I drew the suscepita swiftly across her neck,
severing her arteries. She died in seconds.

I placed the victim on a cloth on the ground beside the altar and opened
the body, extracting and examining the exta. There were no anomalies.
The sacrifice was a litatio.

I boiled the exta, then plucked and cleaned the hen, and grilled the flesh.

Again I washed my hands in preparation for the redditio.

Redditio

"Apollo Medice, dispellator pestilentiae et auxilium patrum nostrorum
Quiritum in tempore pestis et nunc nostrum Novaromanorum Quiritum,macte
istace dape pollucenda esto, macte vino inferio esto [Apollo Medicus,
dispeller of pestilence and help of our fathers, the Quirites, in time
of plague and now of us, the Novaromans, the Quirites, may you be
honoured by this feast offering, may you be honoured by the humble
wine.]" I offered Apollo Medicus a portion of the exta, cakes, and wine
on the focus of the altar.

"Latona mater, quae Medicum spem salutis Senatus Populique Novaromanorum
Quiritum prodidit, macte istace dape pollucenda esto, macte vino inferio
esto [Mother Latona, who brought forth the Healer, the hope of the
health of the Senate and People of the Novaromans, the Quirites, may you
be honoured by this feast offering, may you be honoured by the humble
wine.]" I offered Latona a portion of the exta, cakes, and wine on the
focus of the altar.

"Diana dea, soror Medici et praeses silvarum salutarium, macte istace
dape pollucenda esto, macte vino inferio esto [Goddess Diana, sister of
the Healer and protectress of the healing woodlands, may you be honoured
by this feast offering, may you be honoured by the humble wine.]" I
offered Diana a portion of the exta, cakes, and wine on the focus of the
altar.

"Hercules Salutaris, qui hominibus curam corporis docet, macte istace
dape pollucenda esto, macte vino inferio esto [Healing Hercules, who
teaches care of the body to men, may you be honoured by this feast
offering, may you be honoured by the humble wine.]" I offered Hercules a
portion of the exta, cakes, and wine on the focus of the altar.

"Mercuri domine ventorum, qui ventis halitum noxium terrae pestilentiae
dispellit, macte istace dape pollucenda esto, macte vino inferio esto
[Mercurius, lord of the winds, who dispells the pestilential miasma with
the winds, may you be honoured by this feast offering, may you be
honoured by the humble wine.]" I offered Mercurius a portion of the
exta, cakes, and wine on the focus of the altar.

"Neptune pater, qui halitum noxius pestilentiae in terra tenet, macte
istace dape pollucenda esto, who holds the pestilential miasma within
the earth, macte vino inferio esto [Father Neptunus, may you be honoured
by this feast offering, may you be honoured by the humble wine.]" I
offered Neptunus a portion of the exta, cakes, and wine on the focus of
the altar.

"Quirine pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Father Quirinus, as by
offering to you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the
sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation on
the focus of the altar.

"Mars pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Father Mars, as by offering to
you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the sake of this
be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation on the focus of
the altar.

"Minerva dea, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Goddess Minerva, as by
offering to you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the
sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation on
the focus of the altar.

"Iuno dea, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum, eiusdem
rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Goddess Iuno, as by offering to you
the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the sake of this be
honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation on the focus of the
altar.

"Iupiiter Optime Maxime, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene
precatus sum, eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Iuppiter Best
and Greatest, as by offering to you the incense virtuous prayers were
well prayed, for the sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I
poured a libation on the focus of the altar.

"Iane pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Father Ianus, as by offering
to you the incense virtuous prayers were well prayed, for the sake of
this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation on the focus
of the altar.

"Vesta dea, custos ignis sacri, macte vino inferio esto [Goddess Vesta,
guardian of the sacred fire, be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured
a libation on the focus of the altar.

"Illicet [It is permitted to go.]"

I profaned the flesh, wine, and cakes, and I partook of the
lectisternium with Apollo Medicus, Latona, Diana, Hercules Saluaris,
Mercurius, and Neptunus, praying as I ate and offering libations in my
private devotions.

Piaculum

Since the historical caerimonia of the lectisternium of the Ludi
Apollinares has not yet been recovered, I offered a piaculum to Apollo
Medicus, Latona, Diana, Hercules Salutaris, Mercurius, and Neptunus if
anything in this caerimonia should offend any of them:

"Apollo Medice, si quidquam tibi in hac caerimonia displicet, hoc ture
veniam peto et vitium meum expio [Apollo Medicus, if anything in this
ceremony is displeasing to you, with this incense I ask forgiveness and
expiate my fault.]" I offered incense on the focus of the altar.

"Apollo Medice, si quidquam tibi in hac caerimonia displicet, hoc vino
inferio veniam peto et vitium meum expio [Apollo Medicus, if anything in
this ceremony is displeasing to you, with this humble wine I ask
forgiveness and expiate my fault.]" I poured a libation on the focus of
the altar.

"Latona mater, si quidquam tibi in hac caerimonia displicet, hoc ture
veniam peto et vitium meum expio [Mother Latona, if anything in this
ceremony is displeasing to you, with this incense I ask forgiveness and
expiate my fault.]" I offered incense on the focus of the altar.

"Latona mater, si quidquam tibi in hac caerimonia displicet, hoc vino
inferio veniam peto et vitium meum expio [Mother Latona, if anything in
this ceremony is displeasing to you, with this humble wine I ask
forgiveness and expiate my fault.]" I poured a libation on the focus of
the altar.

"Diana dea, si quidquam tibi in hac caerimonia displicet, hoc ture
veniam peto et vitium meum expio [Goddess Diana, if anything in this
ceremony is displeasing to you, with this incense I ask forgiveness and
expiate my fault.]" I offered incense on the focus of the altar.

"Diana dea, si quidquam tibi in hac caerimonia displicet, hoc vino
inferio veniam peto et vitium meum expio [Goddess Diana, if anything in
this ceremony is displeasing to you, with this humble wine I ask
forgiveness and expiate my fault.]" I poured a libation on the focus of
the altar.

"Hercules Salutaris, si quidquam tibi in hac caerimonia displicet, hoc
ture veniam peto et vitium meum expio [Healing Hercules, if anything in
this ceremony is displeasing to you, with this incense I ask forgiveness
and expiate my fault.]" I offered incense on the focus of the altar.

"Hercules Salutaris, si quidquam tibi in hac caerimonia displicet, hoc
vino inferio veniam peto et vitium meum expio [Healing Hercules, if
anything in this ceremony is displeasing to you, with this humble wine I
ask forgiveness and expiate my fault.]" I poured a libation on the focus
of the altar.

"Mercuri domine ventorum, si quidquam tibi in hac caerimonia displicet,
hoc ture veniam peto et vitium meum expio [Mercurius, lord of the winds,
if anything in this ceremony is displeasing to you, with this incense I
ask forgiveness and expiate my fault.]" I offered incense on the focus
of the altar.

"Mercuri domine ventorum, si quidquam tibi in hac caerimonia displicet,
hoc vino inferio veniam peto et vitium meum expio [Mercurius, lord of
the winds, if anything in this ceremony is displeasing to you, with this
humble wine I ask forgiveness and expiate my fault.]" I poured a
libation on the focus of the altar.

"Neptune pater, si quidquam tibi in hac caerimonia displicet, hoc ture
veniam peto et vitium meum expio [Father Neptunus, if anything in this
ceremony is displeasing to you, with this incense I ask forgiveness and
expiate my fault.]" I offered incense on the focus of the altar.

"Neptune pater, si quidquam tibi in hac caerimonia displicet, hoc vino
inferio veniam peto et vitium meum expio [Father Neptunus, if anything
in this ceremony is displeasing to you, with this humble wine I ask
forgiveness and expiate my fault.]" I poured a libation on the focus of
the altar.

Valete.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Aedilis Curulis, Flamen Quirinalis et Pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25434 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Sicinius Drusus" > This
fits in with a project that I have had in the back of my mind for
> some time, but which I haven't had the time to do anything with. A
> Children's collection of stories that feature tales of Ancient
Romans,
> ones that are intended to teach the Civic and Personal values of
the
> Romans. I Offer the idea up now in the hope that someone who has
more
> time than I do will be able to transform it into reality.


Hmmm, I think we can safely rule that the Rape of Sabine Women
wouldn't meet the criteria for a children's book.

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25435 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Pompeii 'answers' in docu-drama
From http://www.news.com.au/common/printpage/0,6093,10057778,00.html

THE eruption of Mount Vesuvius, which buried Pompeii in 79 AD, has
given historians many insights into life 2,000 years ago. But, as a
new BBC documentary shows, there's still much to learn.

"It was a mystery until quite recently," Pompeii – The Last Day
producer Michael Mosely said from London.
"It was not until about 1988 that anyone came up with an explanation
as to what happened."

Mosely's docu-film attempts to recreate the disastrous eruption,
bringing to life the day an entire city was buried by billions of
tonnes of volcanic lava and ash.

"There were some remains, some skeletons and some casts, and we
wanted to tell their story although we were going to have to partly
fictionalise it because we don't really know what they said or how
they behaved," Mosely said.

"We just know from lots of studies who they were, who they were
related to and how they died.

"And we wanted to be able to end the film with the characters
becoming the skeletons, the casts and things like that."

The film is set around the real story of 18-year-old Roman poet
Gaius Plinius (Pliny the Younger) and his graphic account of the
disaster in which the volcano poured an estimated 10 billion tonnes
of pumice, rock and ash onto the city.

Pliny witnessed Mount Vesuvius erupt and completely bury the cities
of Pompeii and Herculaneum.

His uncle, Pliny the Elder, died that day but Pliny the Younger
survived and wrote a startling account to the Roman historian
Tacitus of what he saw.

"Many lifted up their hands to the gods, but most were convinced
that there were now no gods at all and that this night was the end
of the world," Pliny said in his detailed account of what he saw
that day.

But for all Pliny's insight and the many scientists that have worked
at the site, Mosely said there were still questions to be answered.

"What is surprising about Pompeii is that it gets destroyed in 79AD
and then it gets buried and it is totally forgotten about," Mosely
said.

"It was only rediscovered around 1560 when somebody was trying to
dig a road and they came across this thing."

The docu-film was shot partly in Pompeii itself but mostly in
Tunisia, costing more than STG1 million ($A2.58 million) and taking
about a year to complete.

The film was partially funded by the BBC, receiving other monies
from the US-based Discovery Channel and various French and German
companies.

"It has a lot of volcanology and teaches you a lot about volcanoes
but it also taught a lot about what happened in Roman life," Mosely
said.

Pompeii will air on the Nine network at 8.30pm (AEST) on July 14.

---
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25436 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Scipio, Strabo and the Censorship
Salve Cato,

<Hold on --- there are Nova Roman Thought Police? I wanna join! Do
<you get a badge? And a hat?

No badge, but you get a big pointy hat like a conehead.

Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25437 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Voting Results from the Comitia Centuriata
< Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix obtained a majority of
> centuries in the first round, and is elected Censor suffectus, to serve
> as such until the end of this year.

Congratulations to Sulla! Maybe now the Century points can be corrected on the NR website like I
have been complaining about since Jnauary.

Vale,
Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25438 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Many Thanks
<I am sometimes a
<sentimental, passionate suck, admittedly)..

I'm sure the boys in the Forum are glad to hear that you passionately suck once in awhile.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25439 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Voting Results from the Comitia Centuriata
It is definitely something we will be working on.

Thanks,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Diana Octavia Aventina
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Voting Results from the Comitia Centuriata


< Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix obtained a majority of
> centuries in the first round, and is elected Censor suffectus, to serve
> as such until the end of this year.

Congratulations to Sulla! Maybe now the Century points can be corrected on the NR website like I
have been complaining about since Jnauary.

Vale,
Diana

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25440 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-06
Subject: Re: Many Thanks
Now, Now Diana, sometimes it's best to resist temptation. That is
going to get some of the more uptight ... Err, upright citizens
massivly upset!

Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Diana Octavia Aventina
<sacerdosveneris@y...> wrote:
> <I am sometimes a
> <sentimental, passionate suck, admittedly)..
>
> I'm sure the boys in the Forum are glad to hear that you
passionately suck once in awhile.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25441 From: sabina_equitia_doris Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Dignitas!
Citizens and Magistrates,

I do not subscribe to the Back Alley, precisely because it is off
color.

This morning I arose before dawn to take time to peruse the
overnight postings, as I often enjoy the historical discussions
*here* on the *Nova Roma* main list.

I could not believe what I was reading, regarding the most recent
postings! I had to keeping checking: Yes, this is the Nova Roma
main list, ie *not* the Back Alley.

I have but little doubt but that I am merely the first to take
*grave* exception to the nature of the most recent postings, and
consider it both honor and duty to call them to public and
magisterial attention as inappropriate and Offensive.

More in Sorrow than in Anger,

--Sabina Equita Doris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25442 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
If you don't subscribe to the Back Alley, then how do you know what is
going on there?

Distorted second hand reports from someone who was there 3 years ago?

Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "sabina_equitia_doris"
<doris-butler@s...> wrote:
> Citizens and Magistrates,
>
> I do not subscribe to the Back Alley, precisely because it is off
> color.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25443 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
A. Apollonius Cordus to Sabina Equitia Doris, and to
all citizens and peregrines, greetings.

I can understand your feelings, but let's take a Roman
attitude toward such things. There's a story told
about old Cato - a man of stern morals if ever there
was one - that, seeing a young, unmarried man of
senatorial family go into a brothel, he remarked,
'good'; when he saw the same young man entering the
brothel for the fourth time, he said, 'I did not mean
that you ought to live there'.

Maybe Quaestor Aventina's remarks are not to
everyone's taste, but the occasional low joke, meant
and taken in good part, is not going to do anyone any
harm. The young man has entered the brothel for the
first time in many months; if his visits become daily,
then it will be time for reprimands.





___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - sooooo many all-new ways to express yourself http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25444 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
>The young man has entered the brothel for the
> first time in many months; if his visits become daily,
> then it will be time for reprimands.

A wise and Roman way of looking at things.


Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25445 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
>
> Hmmm, I think we can safely rule that the Rape of Sabine
> Women wouldn't meet the criteria for a children's book.
>
It did. In what was no doubt the Romans' own bowdelrised
version, that the Founding Fathers needed women, asked the
Sabines nicely, got a flea in their collective ear, so came
back and stole themselves wives. It did not occur to the
author either that the women themselevs might have had some
say in the matter! Nor would it to any traditional Indian.

I remember 'inheriting' just such books of ancient myth &
legend from my parental generation including the story. Myth
and legend was published as normal children's literature (I
suspect more boys') in the first half of the last century,
though the impression comes across of warping history to
make the Romans feel ancestral with the genuine Scandinavian
and German ancestors out on a limb.

It probably wasn't quite as it sounds because the use of
'rape' as euphemism for what was then 'violation', itself a
previous euphemism, can't be much more than a century old,
if that. So the significance is probably the older one of
Kidnap (Pope's Rape of the Lock, Rape of Lucrece etc).

Caesariensis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25446 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, me-in-@d... wrote:
> >
> > Hmmm, I think we can safely rule that the Rape of Sabine
> > Women wouldn't meet the criteria for a children's book.
> >
> It did. In what was no doubt the Romans' own bowdelrised
> version, that the Founding Fathers needed women, asked the
> Sabines nicely, got a flea in their collective ear, so came
> back and stole themselves wives. It did not occur to the
> author either that the women themselevs might have had some
> say in the matter! Nor would it to any traditional Indian.
>
> I remember 'inheriting' just such books of ancient myth &
> legend from my parental generation including the story. Myth
> and legend was published as normal children's literature (I
> suspect more boys') in the first half of the last century,

Salve,

That was then and this is now. A generation ago one didn't have the
radical feminist agenda, "political correctness" as well as the
general "dumbing down" of education to deal with. Back then the The
Rape of the Sabine Women, even if sanitized for the age of the
audience, would have been considered a normal part of a classical
education. The only way to make the Rape of the Sabine Women
palatible to the radical feminist and political correctness agenda
would be to use it as an example of "evil patriarchial exploitation
of women."

If the Bible had never been put to pen and a publisher tried to
publish it today it would be roundly denounced as a violent and
filthy book full of rape, murder, incest, sodomy (though another
word would have to be used since sodomy itself comes for the Bible),
the degradation of women, and so on. However with just such a book
review it would be flying off the shelves faster than Harry Potter!

Vale,

Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25447 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Salve Quinte,

That is a good point you make which I heard discussed before. The
answer given back on these bible subject was, " True enough, the
bible mentions adultery, incest, murder, sodomy etc but does not go
into the sexual scenes or subjects in graphic detail like Hustler
Magazine, the Penthouse Forum, Fanny Hill etc; there lies the
difference according to that discussion.

Anyway books ought not to be altered and should be studied with
respect to their times and standards. I remember hearing about some
school boards in the US 20 years ago who wanted to ban Tom Sawyer
and Huck Finn since the "N" word was used about 57 times. Its bad
today but back in that society in the mid 19th century I could have
gone up to Mike Tyson and said, "Hey boy, y'all chop that cotton
before I thrash you!" Today I'd get his huge fist driven in my face
and quickly meet the ferryman with little sympathy from society.
This is today but that was then I figure.

Regards

Quintus Lanius Paulinus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "quintuscassiuscalvus"
<richmal@c...> wrote:
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, me-in-@d... wrote:
> > >
> > > Hmmm, I think we can safely rule that the Rape of Sabine
> > > Women wouldn't meet the criteria for a children's book.
> > >
> > It did. In what was no doubt the Romans' own bowdelrised
> > version, that the Founding Fathers needed women, asked the
> > Sabines nicely, got a flea in their collective ear, so came
> > back and stole themselves wives. It did not occur to the
> > author either that the women themselevs might have had some
> > say in the matter! Nor would it to any traditional Indian.
> >
> > I remember 'inheriting' just such books of ancient myth &
> > legend from my parental generation including the story. Myth
> > and legend was published as normal children's literature (I
> > suspect more boys') in the first half of the last century,
>
> Salve,
>
> That was then and this is now. A generation ago one didn't have
the
> radical feminist agenda, "political correctness" as well as the
> general "dumbing down" of education to deal with. Back then the
The
> Rape of the Sabine Women, even if sanitized for the age of the
> audience, would have been considered a normal part of a classical
> education. The only way to make the Rape of the Sabine Women
> palatible to the radical feminist and political correctness agenda
> would be to use it as an example of "evil patriarchial
exploitation
> of women."
>
> If the Bible had never been put to pen and a publisher tried to
> publish it today it would be roundly denounced as a violent and
> filthy book full of rape, murder, incest, sodomy (though another
> word would have to be used since sodomy itself comes for the
Bible),
> the degradation of women, and so on. However with just such a
book
> review it would be flying off the shelves faster than Harry Potter!
>
> Vale,
>
> Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25448 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
Salvete virii,

Another thought is that even the stories in the Old Testament
are...uhhh..."prettified" for childrens' consumption. I'm not sure
how to do so with the Abduction of the Sabines; just imagine the
pictures...

valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25449 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
> Salve Quinte,
>
> That is a good point you make which I heard discussed before. The
> answer given back on these bible subject was, " True enough, the
> bible mentions adultery, incest, murder, sodomy etc but does not
go
> into the sexual scenes or subjects in graphic detail like Hustler
> Magazine, the Penthouse Forum, Fanny Hill etc; there lies the
> difference according to that discussion.

Salve

Still it is there. People's imagination can be far better at
filling the the gory details than an author's most brutal
description. Or at least people's imaginations used to be before
television turned the average person's attention span into less than
that of a gnat.

Vale,

Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25450 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Family Traditions
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
<mlcinnyc@y...> wrote:
> Salvete virii,
>
> Another thought is that even the stories in the Old Testament
> are...uhhh..."prettified" for childrens' consumption. I'm not
sure
> how to do so with the Abduction of the Sabines; just imagine the
> pictures...
>
> valete,
>
> Cato

Salve,

I don't know about prettified. I'm pretty sure I've never seen a
children's Bible story book depeciting the dubious delights of
Sodom, or an actual circumcision. Since you mention it, why in all
those illustrated children's Bible Story books are Adam and Eve
depicted as having navels? Think about it!

Vale,

Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25451 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Gaius Modius Athanasius S.P.D.

I find it ironic that "Romans" are so thin skinned myself.

When Salix Astur, one of our missing magistrates, essentially called me a dictator over gens reform earlier this year I did not raise a fuss or threaten him with lawsuits. I voted for Astur, and I can take an insult from time to time.

Valete;

Gaius Modius Athanasius

In a message dated 7/7/2004 9:38:40 AM Eastern Daylight Time, "A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...> writes:

>A. Apollonius Cordus to Sabina Equitia Doris, and to
>all citizens and peregrines, greetings.
>
>I can understand your feelings, but let's take a Roman
>attitude toward such things. There's a story told
>about old Cato - a man of stern morals if ever there
>was one - that, seeing a young, unmarried man of
>senatorial family go into a brothel, he remarked,
>'good'; when he saw the same young man entering the
>brothel for the fourth time, he said, 'I did not mean
>that you ought to live there'.
>
>Maybe Quaestor Aventina's remarks are not to
>everyone's taste, but the occasional low joke, meant
>and taken in good part, is not going to do anyone any
>harm. The young man has entered the brothel for the
>first time in many months; if his visits become daily,
>then it will be time for reprimands.
>
>
>    
>    
>        
>___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - sooooo many all-new ways to express yourself http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25452 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
LOL Some people seem to have Rome mixed up with Victorian England. Romans, both ancient and Nova, had an excellent sense of humor. This is precisely why NR has the Back Alley so we can joke around and not offend those who lack a sense of humor.

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: AthanasiosofSpfd@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Dignitas!


Gaius Modius Athanasius S.P.D.

I find it ironic that "Romans" are so thin skinned myself.

When Salix Astur, one of our missing magistrates, essentially called me a dictator over gens reform earlier this year I did not raise a fuss or threaten him with lawsuits. I voted for Astur, and I can take an insult from time to time.

Valete;

Gaius Modius Athanasius

In a message dated 7/7/2004 9:38:40 AM Eastern Daylight Time, "A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...> writes:

>A. Apollonius Cordus to Sabina Equitia Doris, and to
>all citizens and peregrines, greetings.
>
>I can understand your feelings, but let's take a Roman
>attitude toward such things. There's a story told
>about old Cato - a man of stern morals if ever there
>was one - that, seeing a young, unmarried man of
>senatorial family go into a brothel, he remarked,
>'good'; when he saw the same young man entering the
>brothel for the fourth time, he said, 'I did not mean
>that you ought to live there'.
>
>Maybe Quaestor Aventina's remarks are not to
>everyone's taste, but the occasional low joke, meant
>and taken in good part, is not going to do anyone any
>harm. The young man has entered the brothel for the
>first time in many months; if his visits become daily,
>then it will be time for reprimands.
>
>
>
>
>
>___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - sooooo many all-new ways to express yourself http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25453 From: Lucius Pompeius Octavianus Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: withdrawal of resignation
Salvete omnes.
I withdraw my resignation of Senator. I already wrote to one of the
Censors telling him of my decision. I did it within the nine days
period.
Bene valete
L. Pompeius Octavianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25454 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla"
<alexious@e...> wrote:
> LOL Some people seem to have Rome mixed up with Victorian
England. Romans, both ancient and Nova, had an excellent sense of
humor. This is precisely why NR has the Back Alley so we can joke
around and not offend those who lack a sense of humor.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla

Salve,

Yes, even an open sewer has it's purpose in life. <G>

Vale,

Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25455 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
----- Original Message -----
From: quintuscassiuscalvus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 7:08 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Dignitas!


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla"
<alexious@e...> wrote:
> LOL Some people seem to have Rome mixed up with Victorian
England. Romans, both ancient and Nova, had an excellent sense of
humor. This is precisely why NR has the Back Alley so we can joke
around and not offend those who lack a sense of humor.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla

Salve,

Yes, even an open sewer has it's purpose in life. <G>

Vale,

Calvus

Ain't that the truth! <g>
Vale,

Sulla


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25456 From: Bill Gawne Date: 2004-07-07
Subject: Re: withdrawal of resignation
Salvete Quirites, et salve Luci Pompei Octaviane,

Senator Octavianus writes:
> I withdraw my resignation of Senator.

Thanks be! Will you also inform the Senate? Or would you prefer
that I do so for you?

Vale,

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25457 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Ave

You know, saying what Diana said is contemptable (and Cordus, is not an isolate
case, just a few days before the election she suggested that Po was mentally
ill and stuff).

That, as I said, is worth of contempt, but rejoyicing and gloating over it is
even worse, and really beyond comment when coming from a censor, who supposedly
should be the keepers of the public morality around here (yes, Drusus, in case
you'd like to start again the "Censores are not that" thread, you still have to
provide any classic source against the ones Cordus quoted in support of his
position on the matter).

A Censor laughing at a civis (A secerdos, mind you, who maybe should have a
slightly higher, not way lower, standard than others, but what's new about it
after all) dropping in public sexual innuendos (I think that's how you call
them in english, isn't it?) offensive towads a note civis... how nice, and what
a good omen to start your censorship, Sulla. Well done. At least we know where
you stand on the matter of respect and civil behaviour over the mailing list.

Not that I expected a public outrage from you and your peers, but at least the
common sense of keeping quiet and have people overlooking the post... but nahh


Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
PF Constantinia
Aedilis Urbis



Scrive "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@...>:

> LOL Some people seem to have Rome mixed up with Victorian England. Romans,
> both ancient and Nova, had an excellent sense of humor. This is precisely
> why NR has the Back Alley so we can joke around and not offend those who lack
> a sense of humor.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: AthanasiosofSpfd@...
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 3:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Dignitas!
>
>
> Gaius Modius Athanasius S.P.D.
>
> I find it ironic that "Romans" are so thin skinned myself.
>
> When Salix Astur, one of our missing magistrates, essentially called me a
> dictator over gens reform earlier this year I did not raise a fuss or
> threaten him with lawsuits. I voted for Astur, and I can take an insult from
> time to time.
>
> Valete;
>
> Gaius Modius Athanasius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25458 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Ave!

I guess we can count on you not joining the Back Alley. :)

Vale,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
----- Original Message -----
From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 10:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Dignitas!


Ave

You know, saying what Diana said is contemptable (and Cordus, is not an isolate
case, just a few days before the election she suggested that Po was mentally
ill and stuff).

That, as I said, is worth of contempt, but rejoyicing and gloating over it is
even worse, and really beyond comment when coming from a censor, who supposedly
should be the keepers of the public morality around here (yes, Drusus, in case
you'd like to start again the "Censores are not that" thread, you still have to
provide any classic source against the ones Cordus quoted in support of his
position on the matter).

A Censor laughing at a civis (A secerdos, mind you, who maybe should have a
slightly higher, not way lower, standard than others, but what's new about it
after all) dropping in public sexual innuendos (I think that's how you call
them in english, isn't it?) offensive towads a note civis... how nice, and what
a good omen to start your censorship, Sulla. Well done. At least we know where
you stand on the matter of respect and civil behaviour over the mailing list.

Not that I expected a public outrage from you and your peers, but at least the
common sense of keeping quiet and have people overlooking the post... but nahh


Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
PF Constantinia
Aedilis Urbis



Scrive "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@...>:

> LOL Some people seem to have Rome mixed up with Victorian England. Romans,
> both ancient and Nova, had an excellent sense of humor. This is precisely
> why NR has the Back Alley so we can joke around and not offend those who lack
> a sense of humor.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: AthanasiosofSpfd@...
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 3:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Dignitas!
>
>
> Gaius Modius Athanasius S.P.D.
>
> I find it ironic that "Romans" are so thin skinned myself.
>
> When Salix Astur, one of our missing magistrates, essentially called me a
> dictator over gens reform earlier this year I did not raise a fuss or
> threaten him with lawsuits. I voted for Astur, and I can take an insult from
> time to time.
>
> Valete;
>
> Gaius Modius Athanasius
>

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25459 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Ave

No, indeed not, but I'd love for you to point out the list website and make the
archives public, if they are not already, so that myself and everyone else can
see what you and the others write there without having to rely on.. how was it?
"Distorted second hand reports from someone who was there 3 years ago"

Are you up for it?

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
PF Constantinia
Aedilis Urbis




Scrive "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@...>:

> Ave!
>
> I guess we can count on you not joining the Back Alley. :)
>
> Vale,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25460 From: k.a.wright Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
----- Original Message -----
From: "sabina_equitia_doris" <doris-butler@...>

> I have but little doubt but that I am merely the first to take
> *grave* exception to the nature of the most recent postings, and
> consider it both honor and duty to call them to public and
> magisterial attention as inappropriate and Offensive.

LOL! Take exception to what exactly? - The sort of remark any Roman might
have made. Besides what happened to your swearing to resign from Nova Roma
after you'd tried to insist that the women's list could only discuss beauty,
clothes and housekeeping?

Personally I much prefer the Back Alley and the fact that it's going strong
while your list seems to have totally died a death might just seem to
suggest that other Nova Romans feel the same.

Flavia Lucilla Merula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25461 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
G. Equitius Cato F. Lucillae Merulae S.D.

salve, Lucilla Merula.

And what List might you be referring to?

Whether you like it or not, whether you can find ancient sources for
sexual innuendo and outright pornography, it is the duty of the
Censor to remand those who offend the dignitas of Nova Roma and its
citizens. Our junior Censor Suffectus, L. Cornelius Sulla Felix, may
indeed have a belly-laugh "behind the scenes" on the Back Alley List,
but he is duty-bound to act in the interests of *all* citizens in
public. The ancient Romans had a great deal of fun behind the
scenes; in public they upheld the gravitas and dignitas of the
State. Our newly-elected Censor might keep in mind the position he
has in the public eye. He no longer has the freedom to play fast and
loose with his own comments and opinions, at least on the public
Lists. He represents Nova Roma, in all Her dignity and power, to the
great masses of citizens who look to their magistrates for serenity
and equity.

vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "k.a.wright" <k.a.wright@n...>
wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "sabina_equitia_doris" <doris-butler@s...>
>
> > I have but little doubt but that I am merely the first to take
> > *grave* exception to the nature of the most recent postings, and
> > consider it both honor and duty to call them to public and
> > magisterial attention as inappropriate and Offensive.
>
> LOL! Take exception to what exactly? - The sort of remark any
Roman might
> have made. Besides what happened to your swearing to resign from
Nova Roma
> after you'd tried to insist that the women's list could only
discuss beauty,
> clothes and housekeeping?
>
> Personally I much prefer the Back Alley and the fact that it's
going strong
> while your list seems to have totally died a death might just seem
to
> suggest that other Nova Romans feel the same.
>
> Flavia Lucilla Merula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25462 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
<dom.con.fus@f...> wrote:

> That, as I said, is worth of contempt, but rejoyicing and gloating
over it is
> even worse, and really beyond comment when coming from a censor, who
supposedly
> should be the keepers of the public morality around here (yes,
Drusus, in case
> you'd like to start again the "Censores are not that" thread, you
still have to
> provide any classic source against the ones Cordus quoted in support
of his
> position on the matter).

Oh?

I Missed that one, but that isn't unusual, there are times when I'm
Busy and have to settle for scanning list headers.

My Witness is none other than that famed wordsmith Ciecro, a man who
coined several new Latin words for terms in found in the writtings of
the Greeks that the Romans lacked a word for. These included morality.

Later Latin writers were quite fond of this new word and projected it
into the past, most notably Octavian's propagandists who painted a
Golden Age that the first Emperor was going to restore.

That dosen't change the fact that prior to the time the office was
about to be discontinued the Romans didn't even have a word for the
concept that we call Morality, and they certainly didn't subscribe to
a moral code based on Modern or Christian ideas.

Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25463 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Ave

Scrive Lucius Sicinius Drusus <drusus@...>:
> Oh?
>
> I Missed that one, but that isn't unusual, there are times when I'm
> Busy and have to settle for scanning list headers.

Did you? Even when the header was "The moral aspect of the censorship:
evidence"? :)

Ok, was message 25416, but for your convenience, I'll repost it for you, so you
can confute Cordus' position with your own quotes...

"
A. Apollonius Cordus to the Senator L. Sicinius
Drusus, and to all citizens and peregrines, greetings.

I said a few days ago that I would produce my evidence
for the importance of the moral duties of the censors.
I said I would do it on Monday or Tuesday, and so I am
a day late - my apologies, and thanks to you for not
dragging me over the coals for the sake of a day. The
reason for the delay is largely the slightly
unexpected (but most welcome) liveliness of interest
in the rogatorial edict.

Varro, in his 'de lingua latina', book V, ch.
lxxx-lxxxii, says:

"The censor was so named as the one by whose 'rating'
(censio), or judgement, the people should be rated."

There are two things to say about this. One is that of
course Varro was a late republican, and his
etymological ideas were not always correct, so we
cannot assume that he is right here. But his remarks
can be taken as evidence for the perception of the
censura in his own times. Secondly, he concentrates on
the word 'censio'; now, 'censio', and the related verb
'censeo', have meanings relating to the task of
estimating the value of a thing in monetary terms, so
in that respect they seem to refer to the census; but
there is also a certain moral connotation, for they
could also mean the expression or offering of an
opinion or advice. This is an example of what we'll
find again below: the clerical task of taking the
census was not morally neutral, but was itself seen as
an ethically significant task.

Next, Livy, IV.viii.2:

"This same year [443] saw the adoption of the
censorship, an institution which originated in a small
way but afterwards grew up to such dimensions that it
was invested with the regulation of the morals and
discipline of the Romans. The distribution of honour
and ignominy amongst the senate and the centuries of
the knights was controlled by this magistracy, while
jurisdiction over public and private sites, together
with the revenues of the Roman people, were entirely
subject to its discretion."

Notice here not only the emphasis on the function of
the censors as moral supervisors, but also the way in
which Livy appears to regard their more bureaucratic
duties - the letting of public contracts and suchlike
- as part and parcel of this moral supervision.

Of course it is not altogether clear what period Livy
has in mind when he talks about the moral functions of
the censors, but it clearly cannot be the very late
republic, for the censorship was much diminished after
the dictatorship of Sulla, if not before.

To this fact Cicero (in Pisonem 10) testifies:

"We had had [down to 58] the censorship, with its
power of sitting in judgement and branding with
infamy, for 400 years; the power which no one however
wildly irresponsible ever tried to diminish, of
sitting in judgement on our characters every five
years, that power was buried at the very beginning of
your consulship, you assassin."

Of course Cicero is not always strictly accurate with
historical details when in the full flow of his
attack, but it is still worth noting that he suggests
a very ancient pedigree for the moral authority of the
censors, as well as speaking of that moral authority
as the central and characteristic function of the
office.

Elsewhere, in calmer mood (de legibus III.iii.7), he
says:

"Censors shall make a list of the citizens, recording
their ages, families, and slaves and other property.
They shall have charge of the temples, streets, and
aqueducts within the city, and of the public treasury
and the revenues. They shall make a division of the
citizens into tribes, and other divisions according to
wealth, age, and class. They shall enroll the recruits
for the cavalry and infantry; they shall prohibit
celibacy; they shall regulate the morals of the
people; they shall allow no one guilty of
dishonourable conduct to remain in the senate. They
shall be two in number, and shall hold office for five
years. The other magistrates shall hold office for one
year. The office of censor shall never be vacant."

The last two sentences immediately warn us that Cicero
is not quite describing the Roman republic as it was,
but rather his ideal version of it. However, his
interlocutors in the passage which follows the one
I've quoted remark that there are only few and minor
changes from reality, and I hardly think Cicero would
have got away with such a judgement if he had
drastically exaggerated the moral functions of the
censors (which, we note, come at the end of the list,
which together with the beginning (the census) is the
most rhetorically important location).

As for particular cases, you have already remarked on
the well-known case of Cato, and it is true that he
was unusual in his old-fashioned moral gravity. But
his case was far from isolated. Aulus Gellius, in his
'Attic Nights' IV.xii and xx.7-10, says:

"Instances of disgrace and punishment inflicted by the
censors, found in ancient records and worthy of
notice:

If anyone had allows his land to run to waste and was
not giving it sufficient attention, if he had neither
ploughed nor weeded it, or if anyone had neglected his
orchard or vineyard, such conduct did not go
unpunished, but it was taken up by the censors, who
reduced such a man to the lowest class of citizens. So
too, any Roman knight, if his horse seemed to be
skinny or not well groomed, was charged with
inpolitio, a word which means the same thing as
negligence. There are authorities for both these
punishments, and Marcus Cato has cited frequent
instances...

Here is another instance of the sternness of the same
officials. The censors deliberated about the
punishment of a man who had been brought before them
by a friend as his advocate, and who had yawned in
court very clearly and loudly. He was on the point of
being condemned for his lapse, on the ground that it
was an indication of a wandering and trifling mind and
of wanton and undisguised indifference. But when the
man had sworn that the yawn had overcome him much
against his will and in spite of his resistance, and
that he was afflicated with the disorder known as
escedo, or a tendency to yawning, he was excused from
the penalty which had already been determined upon.
Publius Scipio Africanus, son of Paullus, included
both these stories in a speech which he made when
censor, urging the people to follow the customs of
their forefathers."

Observe that Cato had many precedents for his conduct
of the censorship, and that Scipio Aemilianus, a
rather liberal and progressive man who was part of a
circle of Greek-influenced thinkers with democratic
leanings, and whose adoptive grandfather had had a
long-running feud with Cato, also endorsed the moral
authority of the censors and recognised it as an
ancient custom.

Another example, from Livy XLI.xxvii:

"The censors [Q. Fulvius Flaccus and A. Postumius
Albinus, in 174] were strict and painstaking in the
regulation of morals; many of the knights were
deprived of their horses."

Note also that, as Livy goes on to say, they deposed
nine senators, whereas Cato, who was also considered
very strict, only deposed seven.

But you could still argue that these examples are
unusual. Well then, let me give you a counter-example
which suggests otherwise, from Diodorus XX.36.1-6:

"Ap. Claudius... [as censor in 312] disturbed many
ancestral practice; for in currying favour with the
people he paid no attention to the senate... he
changed the composition of the senate, not only
enrolling the noble and eminent in rank, as was
customary, but including many who were sons of
freedmen... He also gave citizens the right to be
enrolled in whichever regional tribe they wished and
to be registered accordingly by the censors... At the
inspection of the cavalry..., he deprived no man of
the horse provided for him by the state..., and in
drawing up the list of senators, he ejected no member
of the senate as unfit, unlike his predecessors."

Here we have a man who was clearly regarded as a bad
censor, and what made him a bad censor? Primarily the
fact that he neglected on all counts to exercise the
moral authority of his office: he adlected unworthy
people and did not expel the unworthy from the senate
or the equites. It is also explicit that this was in
complete contradiction of traditional practice (as
Diodorus says in the first sentence and in the last):
so clearly the moral duties of the censors were
well-established as early as 312, and, as we've seen
from Cicero, persisted until the late republic. This
aspect of the office of censor must not be underestimated"

That was it.

Vale :)

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
PF Constantinia
Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25464 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
As I said the Romans didn't have a word for the Concept prior to
Ciecro, though they did project it back in time once they had the word.

There is one other thing you are opting to ignore, the Romans
certainly didn't subscribe to a modern moral code, nor had Paul Made
up Christanity at the time Romans had Censors so the Office wouldn't
have been tainted by Christian ideas of Morals.

I Can think of one "Moral" Vice that the Censors did remove Senators
for, being engaged in trade. Are you going to be the one who tells
Marcus Cassius that he is going to be bounced from the Senate for that
Immoral Flag and Coin Business he was running? Or Senator Audens for
Selling Maps?

Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
<dom.con.fus@f...> wrote:
> Ave
>
> Scrive Lucius Sicinius Drusus <drusus@b...>:
> > Oh?
> >
> > I Missed that one, but that isn't unusual, there are times when I'm
> > Busy and have to settle for scanning list headers.
>
> Did you? Even when the header was "The moral aspect of the censorship:
> evidence"? :)
>
> Ok, was message 25416, but for your convenience, I'll repost it for
you, so you
> can confute Cordus' position with your own quotes...
>
> "
> A. Apollonius Cordus to the Senator L. Sicinius
> Drusus, and to all citizens and peregrines, greetings.
>
> I said a few days ago that I would produce my evidence
> for the importance of the moral duties of the censors.
> I said I would do it on Monday or Tuesday, and so I am
> a day late - my apologies, and thanks to you for not
> dragging me over the coals for the sake of a day. The
> reason for the delay is largely the slightly
> unexpected (but most welcome) liveliness of interest
> in the rogatorial edict.
>
> Varro, in his 'de lingua latina', book V, ch.
> lxxx-lxxxii, says:
>
> "The censor was so named as the one by whose 'rating'
> (censio), or judgement, the people should be rated."
>
> There are two things to say about this. One is that of
> course Varro was a late republican, and his
> etymological ideas were not always correct, so we
> cannot assume that he is right here. But his remarks
> can be taken as evidence for the perception of the
> censura in his own times. Secondly, he concentrates on
> the word 'censio'; now, 'censio', and the related verb
> 'censeo', have meanings relating to the task of
> estimating the value of a thing in monetary terms, so
> in that respect they seem to refer to the census; but
> there is also a certain moral connotation, for they
> could also mean the expression or offering of an
> opinion or advice. This is an example of what we'll
> find again below: the clerical task of taking the
> census was not morally neutral, but was itself seen as
> an ethically significant task.
>
> Next, Livy, IV.viii.2:
>
> "This same year [443] saw the adoption of the
> censorship, an institution which originated in a small
> way but afterwards grew up to such dimensions that it
> was invested with the regulation of the morals and
> discipline of the Romans. The distribution of honour
> and ignominy amongst the senate and the centuries of
> the knights was controlled by this magistracy, while
> jurisdiction over public and private sites, together
> with the revenues of the Roman people, were entirely
> subject to its discretion."
>
> Notice here not only the emphasis on the function of
> the censors as moral supervisors, but also the way in
> which Livy appears to regard their more bureaucratic
> duties - the letting of public contracts and suchlike
> - as part and parcel of this moral supervision.
>
> Of course it is not altogether clear what period Livy
> has in mind when he talks about the moral functions of
> the censors, but it clearly cannot be the very late
> republic, for the censorship was much diminished after
> the dictatorship of Sulla, if not before.
>
> To this fact Cicero (in Pisonem 10) testifies:
>
> "We had had [down to 58] the censorship, with its
> power of sitting in judgement and branding with
> infamy, for 400 years; the power which no one however
> wildly irresponsible ever tried to diminish, of
> sitting in judgement on our characters every five
> years, that power was buried at the very beginning of
> your consulship, you assassin."
>
> Of course Cicero is not always strictly accurate with
> historical details when in the full flow of his
> attack, but it is still worth noting that he suggests
> a very ancient pedigree for the moral authority of the
> censors, as well as speaking of that moral authority
> as the central and characteristic function of the
> office.
>
> Elsewhere, in calmer mood (de legibus III.iii.7), he
> says:
>
> "Censors shall make a list of the citizens, recording
> their ages, families, and slaves and other property.
> They shall have charge of the temples, streets, and
> aqueducts within the city, and of the public treasury
> and the revenues. They shall make a division of the
> citizens into tribes, and other divisions according to
> wealth, age, and class. They shall enroll the recruits
> for the cavalry and infantry; they shall prohibit
> celibacy; they shall regulate the morals of the
> people; they shall allow no one guilty of
> dishonourable conduct to remain in the senate. They
> shall be two in number, and shall hold office for five
> years. The other magistrates shall hold office for one
> year. The office of censor shall never be vacant."
>
> The last two sentences immediately warn us that Cicero
> is not quite describing the Roman republic as it was,
> but rather his ideal version of it. However, his
> interlocutors in the passage which follows the one
> I've quoted remark that there are only few and minor
> changes from reality, and I hardly think Cicero would
> have got away with such a judgement if he had
> drastically exaggerated the moral functions of the
> censors (which, we note, come at the end of the list,
> which together with the beginning (the census) is the
> most rhetorically important location).
>
> As for particular cases, you have already remarked on
> the well-known case of Cato, and it is true that he
> was unusual in his old-fashioned moral gravity. But
> his case was far from isolated. Aulus Gellius, in his
> 'Attic Nights' IV.xii and xx.7-10, says:
>
> "Instances of disgrace and punishment inflicted by the
> censors, found in ancient records and worthy of
> notice:
>
> If anyone had allows his land to run to waste and was
> not giving it sufficient attention, if he had neither
> ploughed nor weeded it, or if anyone had neglected his
> orchard or vineyard, such conduct did not go
> unpunished, but it was taken up by the censors, who
> reduced such a man to the lowest class of citizens. So
> too, any Roman knight, if his horse seemed to be
> skinny or not well groomed, was charged with
> inpolitio, a word which means the same thing as
> negligence. There are authorities for both these
> punishments, and Marcus Cato has cited frequent
> instances...
>
> Here is another instance of the sternness of the same
> officials. The censors deliberated about the
> punishment of a man who had been brought before them
> by a friend as his advocate, and who had yawned in
> court very clearly and loudly. He was on the point of
> being condemned for his lapse, on the ground that it
> was an indication of a wandering and trifling mind and
> of wanton and undisguised indifference. But when the
> man had sworn that the yawn had overcome him much
> against his will and in spite of his resistance, and
> that he was afflicated with the disorder known as
> escedo, or a tendency to yawning, he was excused from
> the penalty which had already been determined upon.
> Publius Scipio Africanus, son of Paullus, included
> both these stories in a speech which he made when
> censor, urging the people to follow the customs of
> their forefathers."
>
> Observe that Cato had many precedents for his conduct
> of the censorship, and that Scipio Aemilianus, a
> rather liberal and progressive man who was part of a
> circle of Greek-influenced thinkers with democratic
> leanings, and whose adoptive grandfather had had a
> long-running feud with Cato, also endorsed the moral
> authority of the censors and recognised it as an
> ancient custom.
>
> Another example, from Livy XLI.xxvii:
>
> "The censors [Q. Fulvius Flaccus and A. Postumius
> Albinus, in 174] were strict and painstaking in the
> regulation of morals; many of the knights were
> deprived of their horses."
>
> Note also that, as Livy goes on to say, they deposed
> nine senators, whereas Cato, who was also considered
> very strict, only deposed seven.
>
> But you could still argue that these examples are
> unusual. Well then, let me give you a counter-example
> which suggests otherwise, from Diodorus XX.36.1-6:
>
> "Ap. Claudius... [as censor in 312] disturbed many
> ancestral practice; for in currying favour with the
> people he paid no attention to the senate... he
> changed the composition of the senate, not only
> enrolling the noble and eminent in rank, as was
> customary, but including many who were sons of
> freedmen... He also gave citizens the right to be
> enrolled in whichever regional tribe they wished and
> to be registered accordingly by the censors... At the
> inspection of the cavalry..., he deprived no man of
> the horse provided for him by the state..., and in
> drawing up the list of senators, he ejected no member
> of the senate as unfit, unlike his predecessors."
>
> Here we have a man who was clearly regarded as a bad
> censor, and what made him a bad censor? Primarily the
> fact that he neglected on all counts to exercise the
> moral authority of his office: he adlected unworthy
> people and did not expel the unworthy from the senate
> or the equites. It is also explicit that this was in
> complete contradiction of traditional practice (as
> Diodorus says in the first sentence and in the last):
> so clearly the moral duties of the censors were
> well-established as early as 312, and, as we've seen
> from Cicero, persisted until the late republic. This
> aspect of the office of censor must not be underestimated"
>
> That was it.
>
> Vale :)
>
> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
> PF Constantinia
> Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25465 From: K Wright Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato F. Lucillae Merulae S.D.
>
> salve, Lucilla Merula.
>
> And what List might you be referring to?

I was referring to a list for women.

> Whether you like it or not, whether you can find ancient sources
for
> sexual innuendo and outright pornography, it is the duty of the
> Censor to remand those who offend the dignitas of Nova Roma and its
> citizens.

At no time did I mention the Censor. I was asking another citizen
why she hadn't resigned when she had sworn to so do and saying how
much I enjoyed the Back Alley. If you wish to turn that into a
diatribe against the Censor, please don't associate my name with it.

Flavia Lucilla Merula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25466 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Ave Drusus

I'm not saying anything, I'm reporting the hard proofs, taken from the ancients
and quoted by Cordus, that Censores had indeed to do with morality, and you are
not bringing anything to refute this concept but an alledged lack of the word
morals in pre-Cicero time.

Besides, the fact someone doesn't have a word for something doesn't mean he
doesn't have the concept perfectly clear. Romans didn't have the word for
gravity, but I can assure you they had pretty clear in mind that if you drop
something, that tends to falls down, nor, as far as I can remember, had the
word for ballistics, yet they did understand the concept, as the catapults
show.

Also, I take note that the christian morals are considered something that makes
something "tainted". It's just another of the gratuitous offences towards the
religions of the ones not sharing your own, I thank you for that.


Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
PF Constantinia
Aedilis Urbis




Scrive Lucius Sicinius Drusus <drusus@...>:

> As I said the Romans didn't have a word for the Concept prior to
> Ciecro, though they did project it back in time once they had the word.
>
> There is one other thing you are opting to ignore, the Romans
> certainly didn't subscribe to a modern moral code, nor had Paul Made
> up Christanity at the time Romans had Censors so the Office wouldn't
> have been tainted by Christian ideas of Morals.
>
> I Can think of one "Moral" Vice that the Censors did remove Senators
> for, being engaged in trade. Are you going to be the one who tells
> Marcus Cassius that he is going to be bounced from the Senate for that
> Immoral Flag and Coin Business he was running? Or Senator Audens for
> Selling Maps?
>
> Drusus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25467 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Ave,

I'm telling you flat out that the Concepts that moderns attach to the
word were unknown to the Romans.

Now A Roman Censor would have acted in this mater. He would have
Considered Women running around the Forum giving political views to be
very unmatronly, and he would have contacted the Paterfamilis of these
Women and repremanded them for failing to control the women in their
hand. That would be Senator Octavius and Senator Audens.

He wouldn't be enforcing Moral Concepts that are derived from the
strange notions about Sex that Paul wrote into Christanity. These were
unknown to Roman Censors.

We are talking about People who carved Phalic symbols over their doors
to ward off bad luck, who had statues of Priapus in their gardens, who
carved all that "offcolor" graffiti into the walls of pompeii.

Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
<dom.con.fus@f...> wrote:
> Ave Drusus
>
> I'm not saying anything, I'm reporting the hard proofs, taken from
the ancients
> and quoted by Cordus, that Censores had indeed to do with morality,
and you are
> not bringing anything to refute this concept but an alledged lack of
the word
> morals in pre-Cicero time.
>
> Besides, the fact someone doesn't have a word for something doesn't
mean he
> doesn't have the concept perfectly clear. Romans didn't have the
word for
> gravity, but I can assure you they had pretty clear in mind that if
you drop
> something, that tends to falls down, nor, as far as I can remember,
had the
> word for ballistics, yet they did understand the concept, as the
catapults
> show.
>
> Also, I take note that the christian morals are considered something
that makes
> something "tainted". It's just another of the gratuitous offences
towards the
> religions of the ones not sharing your own, I thank you for that.
>
>
> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
> PF Constantinia
> Aedilis Urbis
>
>
>
>
> Scrive Lucius Sicinius Drusus <drusus@b...>:
>
> > As I said the Romans didn't have a word for the Concept prior to
> > Ciecro, though they did project it back in time once they had the
word.
> >
> > There is one other thing you are opting to ignore, the Romans
> > certainly didn't subscribe to a modern moral code, nor had Paul Made
> > up Christanity at the time Romans had Censors so the Office wouldn't
> > have been tainted by Christian ideas of Morals.
> >
> > I Can think of one "Moral" Vice that the Censors did remove Senators
> > for, being engaged in trade. Are you going to be the one who tells
> > Marcus Cassius that he is going to be bounced from the Senate for that
> > Immoral Flag and Coin Business he was running? Or Senator Audens for
> > Selling Maps?
> >
> > Drusus
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25468 From: FAC Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Salve Censor Sulla,

> LOL Some people seem to have Rome mixed up with Victorian
England. Romans, both ancient and Nova, had an excellent sense of
humor.

There is a big differance between the sense of humour and the
Dignitas and the Public life. You could have a wonderful sense of
humour referring not to sexual or pornographic statements.
I know that the Romans was very homouristic and satyrical and I
could send you all the poems of my preferite latin writer, Martiales.
However we are not following the goals and priciples of the Empire
or teh Reign of Caligula. We're rebuilding the Res Publica and I'm
sure that you (and some of your friends) know that the morality in
the public life was the most important thing in the republican roman
society. I remember you the famous differance between the private
life and the public life...
Now you're onw of the highest Magistrate, a Censor, the protector of
the morality. You should protect it and not increase the immorality
of the nova roman society.
I think your statement is quite wrong, you're giving the wrong way
to the cives.

> This is precisely why NR has the Back Alley so we can joke around
and not offend those who lack a sense of humor.

Please, Censor, Nova Roma hasn't Back Alley because it's an
unofficial and not-authorized and not-recognized list of
conseravtive free citizens. Back Alley is not Nova Roma!

It's quite funny to see that the famous traditionalist and
conservative Boni are not defending the moral public life and the
Dignitas inviting to an immoral and pornographical conduct. ;-)

P.S.: Sorry for my bad english, I'm working and I have few time to
check and correct it... :-(

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Senator et Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25469 From: FAC Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Salve Senator Drusus,

> We are talking about People who carved Phalic symbols over their
doors
> to ward off bad luck, who had statues of Priapus in their gardens,
who
> carved all that "offcolor" graffiti into the walls of pompeii.

As I said to Censor Sulla, the graffiti of Pompei was referring to
the Empire and not to the Res Publica. The social conducts and the
public morality were quite different between the Empire and the Res
Publica. NR re-build the repubblican society and not one of the
sexual reign of a crazy Emperor.
About the graffiti, they were only in the brothels. The Priapus' and
phalic symbols are very ancient religious symbol used by the lower
levels of the population and not by higest Magistrates publicly.
Maybe as Pontifex are you saying that the "low joke" by Diana was a
religious pray like the phalic religious symbols were for the Pompei
citizens?
And in any way the sexual religious referrements in Pompei were in
private house and gardens or in burthels and not in the public
forum. I remember you that this list is our "public forum" where
highest Magistrates would be invited to indicate the public conduct
of the citizens.

Are the Censor sayign us that sexual and pornographical jokes are
admitted and moral? Well, everyone here is authorized to do it.

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25470 From: FAC Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Martiale and the public morality
Salvete Omnes,
as one of our highest Magistrates indicated us about jokes and
morality, I would send you a couple of funny poems by Martiales, the
most important latin writer of epygrams.
Marcus Valerius Martiale born in Bilbilis in Hispania at 40 d.C. and
died at 104. He had an hard life under the reign of Titus and his
poems was the only dayly source of money. After Emperor Nerva
appointed him Tribunus Militarium, he came back in Hispania where
spent the last years of his life remembering sadly the Urbe.

The following poems are in Liber I and II. He wrote hundreds of
funny satyrical and political little poems as a very skilled
observer of the emperial roman society.
Further poems and information are available on the web. If you would
like I could send in this public forum the funniest poems...

+++++++++++

23
Inuitas nullum nisi cum quo, Cotta, lauaris
et dant conuiuam balnea sola tibi.
Mirabar quare numquam me, Cotta, uocasses:

+++++++++++

73

Nullus in urbe fuit tota qui tangere uellet
uxorem gratis, Caeciliane, tuam,
dum licuit: sed nunc positis custodibus ingens
turba fututorum est: ingeniosus homo es.

+++++++++++

83

Os et labra tibi lingit, Manneia, catellus:
non miror, merdas si libet esse cani.
iam scio me nudum displicuisse tibi.

+++++++++++

84

Vxorem habendam non putat Quirinalis,
cum uelit habere filios, et inuenit
quo possit istud more: futuit ancillas
domumque et agros implet equitibus uernis.
Pater familiae uerus est Quirinalis.

+++++++++++

42

Zoile, quid solium subluto podice perdis?
Spurcius ut fiat, Zoile, merge caput.

+++++++++++

56

Gentibus in Libycis uxor tua, Galle, male audit
inmodicae foedo crimine auaritiae.
Sed mera narrantur mendacia: non solet illa
accipere omnino. Quid solet ergo? Dare.



Valete
FAC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25471 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
The Views you are expressing about sexuality are the ones that were
introduced into Western Culture by Paul via Christanity, they were
unknown during the Republic. Prior to the adoption of Christanity the
Romans they had a far healthier attitude about sex than that of the
modern world.

As for your nonsense about me condoning Diana's statement and trying
to tie it to the Religio, I posted the first comment on it telling her
that it would be better if she resisted the temptation to post things
like that on this list.

Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "FAC" <sacro_barese_impero@l...> wrote:
> Salve Senator Drusus,
>
> > We are talking about People who carved Phalic symbols over their
> doors
> > to ward off bad luck, who had statues of Priapus in their gardens,
> who
> > carved all that "offcolor" graffiti into the walls of pompeii.
>
> As I said to Censor Sulla, the graffiti of Pompei was referring to
> the Empire and not to the Res Publica. The social conducts and the
> public morality were quite different between the Empire and the Res
> Publica. NR re-build the repubblican society and not one of the
> sexual reign of a crazy Emperor.
> About the graffiti, they were only in the brothels. The Priapus' and
> phalic symbols are very ancient religious symbol used by the lower
> levels of the population and not by higest Magistrates publicly.
> Maybe as Pontifex are you saying that the "low joke" by Diana was a
> religious pray like the phalic religious symbols were for the Pompei
> citizens?
> And in any way the sexual religious referrements in Pompei were in
> private house and gardens or in burthels and not in the public
> forum. I remember you that this list is our "public forum" where
> highest Magistrates would be invited to indicate the public conduct
> of the citizens.
>
> Are the Censor sayign us that sexual and pornographical jokes are
> admitted and moral? Well, everyone here is authorized to do it.
>
> Vale
> Fr. Apulus Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25472 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Dignitas, moral and Bacchanalia
Salvete Omnes!

I seem to remember that the Senate suppressed the Bacchanalia in 186
B.C. Didn't that have anything to do with morals?
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25473 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Gaius Modius Athanasius Domitio Constantino Fusco salutem dicit

Need I remind you that the priesthood of Nova Roma is not the same as the priesthood of Catholicism. We actually have the option of enjoying sex, and having it. Even lots of it if we so choose. So if a priestess of Venus issues an occasional sexual innuendo that should be expected. Now if we had Vestals making sexual innuendos that would be another thing altogether :)

Vale;

Gaius Modius Athanasius

In a message dated 7/8/2004 1:24:50 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus <dom.con.fus@...> writes:

>A Censor laughing at a civis (A secerdos, mind you, who maybe should have a
>slightly higher, not way lower, standard than others, but what's new about it
>after all) dropping in public sexual innuendos (I think that's how you call
>them in english, isn't it?) offensive towads a note civis... how nice, and what
>a good omen to start your censorship, Sulla. Well done. At least we know where
>you stand on the matter of respect and civil behaviour over the mailing list.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25474 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Gaius Modius Athanasius Flaviae Lucillae Merulae salutem dicit

Amen sister! Perhaps if some people would take the virtual stick out of their rear then we could enjoy ourselves within this forum.

Its one thing to be "offended" by political posts, and then its another thing to go on and on about public morals. This is an e-mail list, this is not a physical forum. Were is the enjoyment in being here?

In a time when MOST citizens have become inactive and few and fewer are paying taxes it seems that the magistrates, and senate should be more concerned with WHY people are leaving Nova Roma (instead of inacting more laws). You can only blame the evil Boni for so long. Last time I check the Boni have not held the "power" in Nova Roma.

Vale;

Gaius Modius Athanasius

In a message dated 7/8/2004 2:58:01 AM Eastern Daylight Time, "k.a.wright" <k.a.wright@...> writes:

>LOL!  Take exception to what exactly? -  The sort of remark any Roman might
>have made.  Besides what happened to your swearing to resign from Nova Roma
>after you'd tried to insist that the women's list could only discuss beauty,
>clothes and housekeeping?
>
>Personally I much prefer the Back Alley and the fact that it's going strong
>while your list seems to have totally died a death might just seem to
>suggest that other Nova Romans feel the same.
>
>Flavia Lucilla Merula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25475 From: FAC Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Salve Senator Drusus,

> The Views you are expressing about sexuality are the ones that were
> introduced into Western Culture by Paul via Christanity, they were
> unknown during the Republic. Prior to the adoption of Christanity
the
> Romans they had a far healthier attitude about sex than that of the
> modern world.

I would suggest you to read some latin author of the repubblican
period. Read in special way the differance between the private life
and public life and what about the morality.

> As for your nonsense about me condoning Diana's statement and
trying
> to tie it to the Religio,

I'm not tieing it to the Religio. However you was going to a
religious field comparing the "low joke" by Diana to the Priapus
statues and the phalic symbols. As I said thay were religious
popular signs and not "low jokes". I think you know this as Pontifex.
So if you compare the two things, would I suppose that the "low
joke" is a religious symbols?

> I posted the first comment on it telling her
> that it would be better if she resisted the temptation to post
things
> like that on this list.

I read it and I appreciated it.

vale
FAC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25476 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Gaius Modius Athanasius Domitio Constantino Fusco salutem dicit

Christian "morality" has no place in Nova Roma. Christianity as a religious system is completely irrelevent within the context of Nova Roma, just as Buddhism, Taoism, and other -isms. The private beliefs of citizens are just that private, and there is no place for Christian "morality" within the context of public Nova Roman life. If a citizen wants to be a Christian, and live the life of a saint, that is their personal business. Subjecting others within our Republic to the same "morals" is not acceptable.

The only religion recognized within Nova Roma is the Religio Romana.

Vale;

Gaius Modius Athanasius
Pontifex

In a message dated 7/8/2004 5:09:07 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus <dom.con.fus@...> writes:

>Also, I take note that the christian morals are considered something that makes
>something "tainted". It's just another of the gratuitous offences towards the
>religions of the ones not sharing your own, I thank you for that.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25477 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas, moral and Bacchanalia
The Roman view on sexual morals (along with other things) concerned
loss of control, of excesses. Engaging in Sex or talking about sex was
fine. Letting it (or anything else) dominate your life showed a lack
of moral fiber.

The Bacchanala is the sort of thing that a Roman of the Republican era
would have considered excessive. It wasn't bad because sex and
drinking were involved, it was bad because of a loss of self control.

The Romans did have some tabus about sex, but they were NOT those of
moderns. One was Men were penatrators, but never were susposed to be
penatrated. being a bugger wasn't a big deal, but letting someone
bugger you was. Having another man service you oraly wasn't looked
down on like you servicing another man was. Sex in the daytime (except
for newlyweds) was also looked down on as the mark of a libertine.

Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
<christer.edling@t...> wrote:
> Salvete Omnes!
>
> I seem to remember that the Senate suppressed the Bacchanalia in 186
> B.C. Didn't that have anything to do with morals?
> --
>
> Vale
>
> Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
> Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
> Proconsul Thules
> Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
> Civis Romanus sum
> ************************************************
> Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
> "I'll either find a way or make one"
> ************************************************
> Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
> Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25478 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
G. Iulius Scaurus Fr. Apulo Caesari salutem dicit.

Salve, Caesar.

> > We are talking about People who carved Phalic symbols over their
> doors
> > to ward off bad luck, who had statues of Priapus in their gardens,
> who
> > carved all that "offcolor" graffiti into the walls of pompeii.
>
> As I said to Censor Sulla, the graffiti of Pompei was referring to
> the Empire and not to the Res Publica. The social conducts and the
> public morality were quite different between the Empire and the Res
> Publica. NR re-build the repubblican society and not one of the
> sexual reign of a crazy Emperor.

Vesuvius erupted in the reign of Titus, whose only known peccadilo was
keeping a Jewish mistress whom he put aside when he became emperor. He
had a reputation for being a rather staid fellow. I think you've
misdated Caligula by nearly fifty years.

> About the graffiti, they were only in the brothels. The Priapus' and
> phalic symbols are very ancient religious symbol used by the lower
> levels of the population and not by higest Magistrates publicly.
> Maybe as Pontifex are you saying that the "low joke" by Diana was a
> religious pray like the phalic religious symbols were for the Pompei
> citizens?

Epigraphically speaking, this is nonsense. There is a great deal of
what some might regard as scurrilous graffiti from a large number of
Roman sites in Italia in the Republican period. People scribbled all
sorts of things and did so throughout both the republican and imperial
periods.

> And in any way the sexual religious referrements in Pompei were in
> private house and gardens or in burthels and not in the public
> forum. I remember you that this list is our "public forum" where
> highest Magistrates would be invited to indicate the public conduct
> of the citizens.

And just how do you interpret the literary and archaeological evidence
of the Temple of Venus Erucina in Rome itself?

> Are the Censor sayign us that sexual and pornographical jokes are
> admitted and moral? Well, everyone here is authorized to do it.


To be perfectly honest, the occasional off-colour joke is rather more
Roman, republican or imperial, than most of what gets discussed here
under the guise of politics.

This is a tempest in a teapot, Tribune.

Vale.

Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25479 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Martiale and the public morality
G. Iulius Scaurus Fr. Apulo Caesari salutem dicit.

Salve, Caesar.

Shall I start posting Catullus to the list? He is, unlike Martial, a
republican poet, and I doubt he'd meet your standards of propreity.

Vale.

Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25480 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Gaius Modius Athanasius Fr. Apulo Caeser salutem dicit

Not sure I follow you. Are you saying that as Nova Romans that we should subscribe to a modern sense of morality, a morality that IS tainted by two thousand years of Christianity; a religious system that is NOT Roman.

In the United States our culture has been influenced, in part, by Puritan ideas; and an ideal that I -- personally -- reject any opportunity I can. So what sort of moral life should be advocated?

Its a matter of definition. What might be a moral life to ME might scandal you. I just returned from a nine day Pagan Festival in Southern Ohio. The event was clothing optional, and several of my friends belong to the GLBT community (GLBT is gay, lesbian, bi-sexual, and transgendered) at the event. Some, within Christian society, would claim that homosexuality is an abomination to the moral life.

So how do we define moral life?

I think too many people are uptight, and are simply using *this* as an opportunity to attack a political opponent. This is an ALL volunteer organization, nothing keeps us here save for our love of Rome. We should all try to remember that.

Vale;

Gaius Modius Athanasius
Tribunus Plebis, Flamen Pomonalis, Pontifex, Augur, and Bonus.

In a message dated 7/8/2004 6:19:23 AM Eastern Daylight Time, "FAC" <sacro_barese_impero@...> writes:

>It's quite funny to see that the famous traditionalist and
>conservative Boni are not defending the moral public life and the
>Dignitas inviting to an immoral and pornographical conduct. ;-)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25481 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas, moral and Bacchanalia
Gaius Modius Athanasius Caeso Fabio Quintiliano salutem dicit

The matter of the supression of the Bacchanalia would appear, to our modern eye, to be one of simply public morality. However, in the Roma Antiqua things were not so cut and dry.

From "As the Romans Did: A Sourcebook in Roman Social History," by Jo-Ann Shelton:

"The suppression of Bacchanalia was a political rather than a religious matter. The very aspect that made Bacchus worship appealing to some Romans -- its emotionalism -- made it frightening to others. The ruling class, in particular, was suspicious of any gathering that occurred without the official sanction of the magistrates, and a gathering whose activities were a mystery and which promoted emotional frenzy was especially alarming...the rumors about lewd behavior, kidnappings, forgeries, and murders were probably just that -- rumors based on a misinterpretation of mysterious cult activities. Similar stories were later spread about the Christians. Livy, the author of the passage translated here, has, however, reported these rumors as historical fact; his exaggeration of the danger of the situation probably reflects the perceptions of the upper class."

The author then quotes the text from "A History of Rome," by Levy.

So Censor, I'm sorry, but your attribution of the current "morals scandal" has NOTHING to do with the Bacchanalia...but then again, politics is politics right :)

Vale;

Gaius Modius Athanasius
Pontifex

In a message dated 7/8/2004 7:06:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Caeso Fabius Quintilianus <christer.edling@...> writes:

>Salvete Omnes!
>
>I seem to remember that the Senate suppressed the Bacchanalia in 186
>B.C. Didn't that have anything to do with morals?
>--
>
>Vale
>
>Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
>Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
>Proconsul Thules
>Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
>Civis Romanus sum
>************************************************
>Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
>"I'll either find a way or make one"
>************************************************
>Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
>Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25482 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, AthanasiosofSpfd@a... wrote:

> So how do we define moral life?
>

We Define it by Roman standards, not by those of Christians, Muslams,
Hindus, or whoever else.

An intrest in sex or an off color joke is NOT immoral by Roman standards.

To use a modern context, visting a porn site is not immoral, but
spending 5 or 6 hours a day downloading porn is immoral, and the
immoral part isn't that it's related to sex, it's the excessive
intrest in sex, the lack of self control shown by letting it dominate
your life.

Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25483 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Ave Athanasios

One thing is that the only religion officially recognized is the Religio Romana,
another is taking the morals of the other religions and isse judgments
(especially negative ones) about them over the public list, and unecessarly
too, given that until Drusus had named them, no one had even vaguely hinted at
christian morals.

So, wear down, if you please, your "The religio, only the Religio" banner. Once
you have taken it away from covering your eyes, maybe you will see that
starting to drop comments about the ethics and morals of the others will just
make things here worse for everyone, leading to everyone's position hardening.

Have your moral code and sacrifice your hens, pontifex, you shall not hear me
saying that you are tainting anything with that, but I think the non
practitioenrs have the same right about their own code, and especially of not
having them brought into teh question when they had nothing to do with the
discussion.

And this has nothing to do with the Religio being the only religion "recognized"
(but weren't your collegues the ones saying that the concept of a "recognized"
religion is alien to Rome, but proper of a XIX century modern state? I think
so), is a matter of being able to cohesist. It's just the same rule of thumb
that should tell people, and indeed usually does, that is not a wise thing to
drop comments about the respective countries of origin, their costumes and
governments. Considered that all the religions are officially welcomed, if not
recognized, here, it would be nice if we could avoid harsh judgments about
them, as I'm sure you wouldn't like harsh judgments from me about yours. Can't
we agree on that?

Vale.

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
PF Constantinia
Aedilis Urbis





Scrive AthanasiosofSpfd@...:

> Gaius Modius Athanasius Domitio Constantino Fusco salutem dicit
>
> Christian "morality" has no place in Nova Roma. Christianity as a religious
> system is completely irrelevent within the context of Nova Roma, just as
> Buddhism, Taoism, and other -isms. The private beliefs of citizens are just
> that private, and there is no place for Christian "morality" within the
> context of public Nova Roman life. If a citizen wants to be a Christian, and
> live the life of a saint, that is their personal business. Subjecting others
> within our Republic to the same "morals" is not acceptable.
>
> The only religion recognized within Nova Roma is the Religio Romana.
>
> Vale;
>
> Gaius Modius Athanasius
> Pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25484 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Ave,

Trying to avoid the source of the Moral system you seek to impose on
Nova Roma has no effect on the fact that it IS rooted in Christian
Morality.

Since this is susposed to be a Roman organization the only system of
public morality that makes sense is that of the Romans.

Attempting to divorce a moral concept from it's source opens the door
to attempting to ban anything under a vauge cry of "It's immoral"

Do we ban Abortions as "immoral" on the advice of the Bishop of Rome?

Do we ban Paganism as "immoral" on the advice of Jerry Falwell?

Do we ban Homosexuality as "immoral" on the advice Pat Robertson?

Do we ban women from appearing in public unveiled as "immoral" on the
advice of Osama Bin Laden?

Do we enact "moral" laws protecting Sacred Cows on the advice of the
Hari Krishnas?

What you are seeking is a magic spell, an incantation that allows you
to make any opposition in enforcing your will apon others vanish by
chanting "Morality"

Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
<dom.con.fus@f...> wrote:
> Ave Athanasios
>
> One thing is that the only religion officially recognized is the
Religio Romana,
> another is taking the morals of the other religions and isse judgments
> (especially negative ones) about them over the public list, and
unecessarly
> too, given that until Drusus had named them, no one had even vaguely
hinted at
> christian morals.
>
> So, wear down, if you please, your "The religio, only the Religio"
banner. Once
> you have taken it away from covering your eyes, maybe you will see that
> starting to drop comments about the ethics and morals of the others
will just
> make things here worse for everyone, leading to everyone's position
hardening.
>
> Have your moral code and sacrifice your hens, pontifex, you shall
not hear me
> saying that you are tainting anything with that, but I think the non
> practitioenrs have the same right about their own code, and
especially of not
> having them brought into teh question when they had nothing to do
with the
> discussion.
>
> And this has nothing to do with the Religio being the only religion
"recognized"
> (but weren't your collegues the ones saying that the concept of a
"recognized"
> religion is alien to Rome, but proper of a XIX century modern state?
I think
> so), is a matter of being able to cohesist. It's just the same rule
of thumb
> that should tell people, and indeed usually does, that is not a wise
thing to
> drop comments about the respective countries of origin, their
costumes and
> governments. Considered that all the religions are officially
welcomed, if not
> recognized, here, it would be nice if we could avoid harsh judgments
about
> them, as I'm sure you wouldn't like harsh judgments from me about
yours. Can't
> we agree on that?
>
> Vale.
>
> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
> PF Constantinia
> Aedilis Urbis
>
>
>
>
>
> Scrive AthanasiosofSpfd@a...:
>
> > Gaius Modius Athanasius Domitio Constantino Fusco salutem dicit
> >
> > Christian "morality" has no place in Nova Roma. Christianity as a
religious
> > system is completely irrelevent within the context of Nova Roma,
just as
> > Buddhism, Taoism, and other -isms. The private beliefs of
citizens are just
> > that private, and there is no place for Christian "morality"
within the
> > context of public Nova Roman life. If a citizen wants to be a
Christian, and
> > live the life of a saint, that is their personal business.
Subjecting others
> > within our Republic to the same "morals" is not acceptable.
> >
> > The only religion recognized within Nova Roma is the Religio Romana.
> >
> > Vale;
> >
> > Gaius Modius Athanasius
> > Pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25485 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Citizens leaving
Salve Illustris Gaius Modius Athanasius, Amice!

Just some comment on a few statment that You have done:

At 07.22 -0400 04-07-08, AthanasiosofSpfd@... wrote:
"In a time when MOST citizens have become inactive"

I don't have this impression. Do have _proof_ for this?

At 07.22 -0400 04-07-08, AthanasiosofSpfd@... wrote:
"few and fewer are paying taxes"

Fewer has paid in time (at least I think so) compared to last year,
but fewer and fewer? I seem to remember at least half a dozen that
have ásked to pay after the time limit that I know of.

At 07.22 -0400 04-07-08, AthanasiosofSpfd@... wrote:
"it seems that the magistrates, and senate should be more concerned
with WHY people are leaving Nova Roma"

I really agree that we all, not only magistrates, and senate, which
"groups" You as a Tribune are a part of, should concern us with. I
have some ideas, please read below!

Why people leave Nova Roma? People certainly leave Nova Roma as they
have always done. The reasons often are very private or that Nova
Roma wasn't their cup of tea.

We have had no research into why people leave and as a Censor I am
very interested in looking into this. But we know from earlier
periods that there always are people who think that the tone is to
rude and to argumantative and they leave because of that. I really
would like us to be kinder and more polite to each other, I am sure
that we would keep a few more if we were. If we also contacted the
capiti Censi outside the tax period and told them about our ongoing
projects and asked them to support Nova Roma even more as assidui I
think that the number that would start to think about Nova Roma and
enganging themselves in our work would grow. But also I think we
should cut down on our infighting and start working together for the
betterment of Nova Roma.

At 07.22 -0400 04-07-08, AthanasiosofSpfd@... wrote:
"instead of inacting more laws"

Which laws?

People don't just leave Nova Roma, they also join Nova Roma. Since
January to the end of June this year we have had 380 requests to join
Nova Roma. I will get exact statistics within a couple of months. But
if we assume that 50% will become passive (socii) or disappear in
other ways we still will have a fair number (190) that are fairly
active (assidui and capti censi). With such a growth rate we may be
close to 3.000 citizens in five years if we can keep them. Remember
this is just speculations. To increase the assidui I think it would
be best to contact all capti censi personally through the Consuls,
Consular Quaestors and the Governors. This may yield a increaing
number of assidui. The capiti censi are like a fieled of corn, it is
our duty to harvest assidui among them as they may well not be aware
of the need for taxpaying citizens.
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25486 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: withdrawal of resignation
A. Apollonius Cordus to the Senator L. Pompeius
Octavianus, and to all citizens and peregrines,
greetings.

> I withdraw my resignation of Senator.

Excellent news!

> ... I already
> wrote to one of the
> Censors telling him of my decision. I did it within
> the nine days
> period.

Just on a technical point: the lex Cornelia Maria,
which mentions the nine-day period, is only relevant
to cases of resigned citizenship. Membership of the
senate can't, under current law, be retrieved after
resignation; so technically I think the Consul will
have to ask the senate to reinstate you at its next
meeting. But I'm sure that will present no problem.





___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - sooooo many all-new ways to express yourself http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25487 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Salvete Quirites, et salve Luci Sicini,

Lucius Sicinius Drusus wrote:

> Since this is susposed to be a Roman organization the only system of
> public morality that makes sense is that of the Romans.

I would agree if you had said that the only *basis* for public morality
was that of the Romans. But in doing so, I'd also require that the term
'public morality' be understood as it was in the Roman Republic of
antiquity. As you've rightly said, it had little to do with sex and
much more to do with dignity and excess.

That said, I think the issue here has less to do with morality, either
public or private, and more to do with the reasonable expectations of
people to be respected, and see others respected, in a given venue.
There is ample information available in the files section of this
mailing list and in the information sent to people when they join it
dealing with what is and is not considered appropriate here. If someone
chooses to violate the guidelines, it is reasonable that others,
expecting better, will speak out.

Diana made her comment, Doris took exception to it in public. Others
have written to the moderators in private. Communications have taken
place, and if people will now just let this die we might be able to
enjoy the Ludi Apollonaris.

Valete Quirites,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25488 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Gaius Modius Athanasius S.P.D.

The only thing that I can be agree upon is that the Religio Romana is the
only PUBLIC Religion honored by Nova Roma.

Piety and duty is in the realm of morals right? So when are those
"non-practitioner" magistrates and senators going to start making offerings/sacrifices
to the Gods and show their piety? Be careful what you wish for Fuscus, if you
want to talk virtue we can take several different angles on it.

Vale;

Gaius Modius Athanasius

In a message dated 7/8/2004 8:59:54 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
dom.con.fus@... writes:
Considered that all the religions are officially welcomed, if not
recognized, here, it would be nice if we could avoid harsh judgments about
them, as I'm sure you wouldn't like harsh judgments from me about yours. Can't
we agree on that?


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25489 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
A. Apollonius Cordus to all citizens and peregrines,
greetings.

Just a few comments on issues that have arisen.

Senator Drusus' point about the absence of a Latin
word directly corresponding to 'morality' is fair
enough, and he's quite right to say that the Roman
idea of what was good and what bad was different from
most modern ones in some respects. I think he is
putting it a bit strongly when he says (or implies)
that the Romans had no concept of morality at all.
It's abundantly clear that they had a sense that some
things were right and proper, and even laudable, and
others condemnable.

It would perhaps be better to say that they didn't go
in very much for absolute moral principles, except
when philosophizing. There were many things that
people of senatorial class were expected to avoid
doing - things which would have been most damaging to
their reputations and could have got them expelled
from the senate - which it was perfectly acceptable
for merchants and artisans to do; and there were yet
more things which were unbecoming to merchants but not
to actors and prostitutes. For a senator to own too
much silver plate, or run trading vessels, would have
attracted the reprimand of the censors not because it
was wrong in absolute terms, but because it was
unbecoming to a senator and brought the name of the
senate into disrepute. So what we might call morality,
and what the censors were concerned with, was more a
matter of ensuring that people behaved appropriately
to their social status and did not damage their own
dignity, and that of their family and peers, by
behaving disreputably. If to call this 'morality' is
misleading, let's call it 'proper conduct'.

I think it is abundantly clear that censors were
supposed to be, and in many cases were, concerned with
proper conduct and the policing of it. But I don't
think they would have been terribly concerned about
the frankly very mild innuendo which sparked off this
discussion (and let those who are worried about the
impressionable minds of children ask themselves
whether a child who wasn't already acquainted with
such ideas would in fact have found anything risque in
the comment at all). Doing something improper or
disreputable was not the same as talking about such
conduct.

To be sure, a man of senatorial class who found
himself on the receiving end of a remark such as that
made by the Quaestor and Priestess might perhaps have
been offended, because if it had been true it would
certainly have damaged his reputation most severely.
If it were true, the censors would probably at least
have considered removing him from the roll of the
senate; but I hardly think they would have taken any
measures against the quaestor who said it, even if it
had been meant as a serious accusation.

I'm not suggesting that our censors ought strictly and
exclusively to enforce the ancient Roman code of
conduct. As Senator Drusus has pointed out, it is no
longer appropriate to reprimand senators for selling
goods, because such commercial activities are no
longer generally considered disreputable and they do
not damage the good name of the senate. So there are
elements of the Roman standards of proper conduct
which we may omit. Perhaps there are also ones we
might wish to introduce. But I really don't think it
desirable for the censors to concern themselves with
innuendo, unless perhaps it becomes so endemic in the
Forum that it causes serious harm to Nova Roma's
reputation or impinges on serious and important
debate; and we are a long way from that.





___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - sooooo many all-new ways to express yourself http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25490 From: Mike Abboud Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Roman Censors
Salve

I noticed some disagreement as to what the Roman Censor did for the
republic. It was my impression that he took the censes every five
years to determine what century you voted with. I also thought it
was their job to insure that those who offended the gods were
prosecuted something called impiety toward the gods. It was one of
the few charges that could get a rich roman into trouble. I also
thought that by fufilling your duty to the gods, family and state
made a roman "moral". I was under the impression that the romans
after the greek influx relied on secular philosophy for "moral"
guidence. Am I wrong or is their more to Roman morality and the
censor.

Tiberious Arcana Agricola(if I should ever get my citizenship, which
I have been trying to do since may...not that I am complaining, the
censor is on it :))

PS is the male form of Arcanus arcana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25491 From: Marcus Bianchius Antonius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Caeso Fabius Quintilianus <christer.edling@...> wrote:
Salve Illustris Gaius Modius Athanasius, Amice!

Just some comment on a few statment that You have done:

At 07.22 -0400 04-07-08, AthanasiosofSpfd@... wrote:
"In a time when MOST citizens have become inactive"

I don't have this impression. Do have _proof_ for this?

MBA: Perhaps you should see the amount od socii we have. I am propraetor of Lacus Magni and we have more inactive citizens that we have active. If you need proof, I can give you my complete census report where I can show you that MOST of the citizens in my provicia are inactive. It is difficult to get more citizens active when the ML is one really, really, really long argument and very little about Rome (past or present). You can watch them pop on the list and then after a week pop right back off. Its hard to generate interest when argument is the number one NR activity.





Marcus Bianchius Antonius
Propraetor, The Great Provincia Lacus Magni
Paterfamilias, gens Bianchia
Quaestor, Nova Roma

---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25492 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Gaius Modius Athanasius Caeso Fabio Quintiliano salutem dicit

Considering the number of socius and capite censi citizens Nova Roma has I
think it is safe to say that the majority of citizens are not active. Ask the
Rogators how many citizens voted, I would be very curious to know the number.
I am sure it would sadden us all.

Activity IS down, and assidui are down as well. That is simply a fact. As a
tribune I am concerned about that status of Nova Roma, very much so.

Which laws....the slew of them recently passed and presented by Tribune
Faustus; all of which I had no idea were being presented and didn't find out until
I arrived home from vacation.

I have seen some of the recent citizens who have joined Nova Roma. They send
posts like, "how can I get a passport... were is your embassy.... how can I
get a job in Nova Roma..." Pathetic. These are not citizens, they are
desperate people wanting out from wherever they currently live.

There should be MORE to becoming a citizen than simply filling out an on-line
form. We hand out citizenship too easily. I also agree that fighting and
rude behavior is a factor. Also, another factor is that many people join Nova
Roma for the Religio yet get frustrated when the Religio falls under attack.

Vale;

Gaius Modius Athanasius

In a message dated 7/8/2004 9:41:16 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
christer.edling@... writes:
"In a time when MOST citizens have become inactive"

I don't have this impression. Do have _proof_ for this?

At 07.22 -0400 04-07-08, AthanasiosofSpfd@... wrote:
"few and fewer are paying taxes"

Fewer has paid in time (at least I think so) compared to last year,
but fewer and fewer? I seem to remember at least half a dozen that
have ásked to pay after the time limit that I know of.

At 07.22 -0400 04-07-08, AthanasiosofSpfd@... wrote:
"it seems that the magistrates, and senate should be more concerned
with WHY people are leaving Nova Roma"

I really agree that we all, not only magistrates, and senate, which
"groups" You as a Tribune are a part of, should concern us with. I
have some ideas, please read below!

Why people leave Nova Roma? People certainly leave Nova Roma as they
have always done. The reasons often are very private or that Nova
Roma wasn't their cup of tea.

We have had no research into why people leave and as a Censor I am
very interested in looking into this. But we know from earlier
periods that there always are people who think that the tone is to
rude and to argumantative and they leave because of that. I really
would like us to be kinder and more polite to each other, I am sure
that we would keep a few more if we were. If we also contacted the
capiti Censi outside the tax period and told them about our ongoing
projects and asked them to support Nova Roma even more as assidui I
think that the number that would start to think about Nova Roma and
enganging themselves in our work would grow. But also I think we
should cut down on our infighting and start working together for the
betterment of Nova Roma.

At 07.22 -0400 04-07-08, AthanasiosofSpfd@... wrote:
"instead of inacting more laws"

Which laws?

People don't just leave Nova Roma, they also join Nova Roma. Since
January to the end of June this year we have had 380 requests to join
Nova Roma. I will get exact statistics within a couple of months. But
if we assume that 50% will become passive (socii) or disappear in
other ways we still will have a fair number (190) that are fairly
active (assidui and capti censi). With such a growth rate we may be
close to 3.000 citizens in five years if we can keep them. Remember
this is just speculations. To increase the assidui I think it would
be best to contact all capti censi personally through the Consuls,
Consular Quaestors and the Governors. This may yield a increaing
number of assidui. The capiti censi are like a fieled of corn, it is
our duty to harvest assidui among them as they may well not be aware
of the need for taxpaying citizens.
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25493 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Salve Gaius Modius Athanasius who said in part

"The only religion recognized within Nova Roma is the Religio Romana."

Not altogether true. While the Religio Romana is the Official religion of Nova Roma

the constitution also says

" Nova Roma shall approach all other religions with a syncretistic outlook, offering friendship to all paths which acknowledge the right of those who practice and honor the Religio Romana to do so and respect the beliefs thereof."

Religio Romana is the official religion of Nova Roma but the constitution recognizes that citizens may have other religions and "offers friendship to all:... as long as their members respect the the Religio Romana and the citizens who practice it.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus




----- Original Message -----
From: AthanasiosofSpfd@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 7:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Dignitas!


Gaius Modius Athanasius Domitio Constantino Fusco salutem dicit

Christian "morality" has no place in Nova Roma. Christianity as a religious system is completely irrelevent within the context of Nova Roma, just as Buddhism, Taoism, and other -isms. The private beliefs of citizens are just that private, and there is no place for Christian "morality" within the context of public Nova Roman life. If a citizen wants to be a Christian, and live the life of a saint, that is their personal business. Subjecting others within our Republic to the same "morals" is not acceptable.

The only religion recognized within Nova Roma is the Religio Romana.

Vale;

Gaius Modius Athanasius
Pontifex

In a message dated 7/8/2004 5:09:07 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus <dom.con.fus@...> writes:

>Also, I take note that the christian morals are considered something that makes
>something "tainted". It's just another of the gratuitous offences towards the
>religions of the ones not sharing your own, I thank you for that.


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25494 From: Marcus Traianus Valerius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
The Honorable L. Cornelius Sulla Wrote:

"LOL Some people seem to have Rome mixed up with Victorian England. Romans, both ancient and Nova, had an excellent sense of humor."

MTV: Here, Here!!! I think there are way to many people who check their sense of humor at the door when they read some of the posts on the ML. Life is to short to let small things get to you.

Ita di deaque faxint!
M. Traianus Valerius

------------------------------------------------------------
Gens Traiana Home Page
www.geocities.com/genstraiana



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25495 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Gaius Modius Athanasius Tiberio Galerio Paulino salutem dicit

Agreed. The status of the Religio Romana is not brought into question by
acknowledging the rights of individual citizens to believe as they wish. I honor
this myself.

Vale;

Gaius Modius Athanasius

In a message dated 7/8/2004 10:08:28 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
spqr753@... writes:
Religio Romana is the official religion of Nova Roma but the constitution
recognizes that citizens may have other religions and "offers friendship to
all:... as long as their members respect the the Religio Romana and the citizens
who practice it.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25496 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Ave,

From what I have seen since I've been in Nova Roma the number one
reason that citizens leave is they joined on a whim and stuck around
until another whim struck them.

As long as becomming a citizen dosen't require any more effort than
filling out a web form and having the luck to select a Gens that is
good about approving people we will continue to have a lot of
"butterfly" citizens who flutter in for a short time and then flutter
off somewhere else.

I Think the number two reason is they joined Nova Roma for some
intrests other than politics and found they were in an organization
that is dominated by politics and which has little time for the
reasons they joined. I'm not talking about HOW politics are handled
either, I'm talking about the AMMOUNT of politics.

Domination by politics is the reason that Marcus Scribonius Curio
Britannicus gave a short time ago for leaving Nova Roma for the SVR. A
Former citizen who is on the back alley list also gave that as his
reason for leaving.

Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, AthanasiosofSpfd@a... wrote:
> Gaius Modius Athanasius Caeso Fabio Quintiliano salutem dicit
>
> Considering the number of socius and capite censi citizens Nova Roma
has I
> think it is safe to say that the majority of citizens are not
active. Ask the
> Rogators how many citizens voted, I would be very curious to know
the number.
> I am sure it would sadden us all.
>
> Activity IS down, and assidui are down as well. That is simply a
fact. As a
> tribune I am concerned about that status of Nova Roma, very much so.
>
> Which laws....the slew of them recently passed and presented by Tribune
> Faustus; all of which I had no idea were being presented and didn't
find out until
> I arrived home from vacation.
>
> I have seen some of the recent citizens who have joined Nova Roma.
They send
> posts like, "how can I get a passport... were is your embassy....
how can I
> get a job in Nova Roma..." Pathetic. These are not citizens, they are
> desperate people wanting out from wherever they currently live.
>
> There should be MORE to becoming a citizen than simply filling out
an on-line
> form. We hand out citizenship too easily. I also agree that
fighting and
> rude behavior is a factor. Also, another factor is that many people
join Nova
> Roma for the Religio yet get frustrated when the Religio falls under
attack.
>
> Vale;
>
> Gaius Modius Athanasius
>
> In a message dated 7/8/2004 9:41:16 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> christer.edling@t... writes:
> "In a time when MOST citizens have become inactive"
>
> I don't have this impression. Do have _proof_ for this?
>
> At 07.22 -0400 04-07-08, AthanasiosofSpfd@a... wrote:
> "few and fewer are paying taxes"
>
> Fewer has paid in time (at least I think so) compared to last year,
> but fewer and fewer? I seem to remember at least half a dozen that
> have ásked to pay after the time limit that I know of.
>
> At 07.22 -0400 04-07-08, AthanasiosofSpfd@a... wrote:
> "it seems that the magistrates, and senate should be more concerned
> with WHY people are leaving Nova Roma"
>
> I really agree that we all, not only magistrates, and senate, which
> "groups" You as a Tribune are a part of, should concern us with. I
> have some ideas, please read below!
>
> Why people leave Nova Roma? People certainly leave Nova Roma as they
> have always done. The reasons often are very private or that Nova
> Roma wasn't their cup of tea.
>
> We have had no research into why people leave and as a Censor I am
> very interested in looking into this. But we know from earlier
> periods that there always are people who think that the tone is to
> rude and to argumantative and they leave because of that. I really
> would like us to be kinder and more polite to each other, I am sure
> that we would keep a few more if we were. If we also contacted the
> capiti Censi outside the tax period and told them about our ongoing
> projects and asked them to support Nova Roma even more as assidui I
> think that the number that would start to think about Nova Roma and
> enganging themselves in our work would grow. But also I think we
> should cut down on our infighting and start working together for the
> betterment of Nova Roma.
>
> At 07.22 -0400 04-07-08, AthanasiosofSpfd@a... wrote:
> "instead of inacting more laws"
>
> Which laws?
>
> People don't just leave Nova Roma, they also join Nova Roma. Since
> January to the end of June this year we have had 380 requests to join
> Nova Roma. I will get exact statistics within a couple of months. But
> if we assume that 50% will become passive (socii) or disappear in
> other ways we still will have a fair number (190) that are fairly
> active (assidui and capti censi). With such a growth rate we may be
> close to 3.000 citizens in five years if we can keep them. Remember
> this is just speculations. To increase the assidui I think it would
> be best to contact all capti censi personally through the Consuls,
> Consular Quaestors and the Governors. This may yield a increaing
> number of assidui. The capiti censi are like a fieled of corn, it is
> our duty to harvest assidui among them as they may well not be aware
> of the need for taxpaying citizens.
> --
>
> Vale
>
> Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25497 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
G. Equitius Cato L. Sicinio Druso S.D.

salve, Sicinius Drusus.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Sicinius Drusus"
<drusus@b...> wrote:
> The Views you are expressing about sexuality are the ones that were
> introduced into Western Culture by Paul via Christanity, they were
> unknown during the Republic.


CATO: Not St. Paul. St. Augustine of Hippo did the
most "interesting" work regarding sex vis-a-vis Christianity. St.
Paul was merely requiring a strict moral public code from Christians,
especially Christian women. St. Augustine created the rather
unhealthy squeamishness regarding sexuality that has unfortunately
colored the Roman Catholic view since. The Orthodox do not have that
view.


As for the Republican Romans not having a concept of
public "morality":


"Quo usque tandem abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra? Quam diu etiam
furor iste tuus nos eludet? Quem ad finem sese effrenata iactabit
audacia? Nihilne te nocturnum praesidium Palati, nihil urbis
vigiliae, nihil timor populi, nihil concursus bonorum omnium, nihil
hic munitissimus habendi senatus locus, nihil horum ora voltusque
moverunt? patere tua consilia non sentis, constrictam iam horum
omnium scientia teneri coniurationem tuam non vides? Quid proxima,
quid superiore nocte egeris, ubi fueris, quos convocaveris, quid
consili ceperis quem nostrum ignorare arbitraris? O tempora, o mores!
Senatus haec intellegit, consul videt; hic tamen vivit. Vivit? immo
vero etiam in senatum venit, fit publici consili particeps, notat et
designat oculis ad caedem unum quemque nostrum."

"WHEN, O Catiline, do you mean to cease abusing our patience? How
long is that madness of yours still to mock us? When is there to be
an end of that unbridled audacity of yours, swaggering about as it
does now? Do not the nightly guards placed on the Palatine
Hill—do not the watches posted throughout the city—does not
the alarm
of the people, and the union of all good men—does not the
precaution
taken of assembling the senate in this most defensible place—do
not
the looks and countenances of this venerable body here present, have
any effect upon you? Do you not feel that your plans are detected? Do
you not see that your conspiracy is already arrested and rendered
powerless by the knowledge which every one here possesses of it? What
is there that you did last night, what the night before—where is
it that you were—who was there that you summoned to meet
you—what design was there which was adopted by you, with which
you
think that any one of us is unacquainted? Shame on the age and on its
principles! The senate is aware of these things; the consul sees
them; and yet this man lives. Lives? aye, he comes even into the
senate. He takes a part in the public deliberations; he is watching
and marking down and checking off for slaughter every individual
among us."

---Cicero, First Oration Against Catiline, 63 B.C.E.

"Mores" I have seen translated as "morals," "moral standards," even
the people's "habits". Perhaps the Latin word incorporates all such
things (Flavia Tullia could explain better), but of course we use the
word "mores" in English too (not just "morals"), to mean the general
standards underpinning a society's actions.

Risus abundat in ore stultorum.

vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25498 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: If You Really Wanna do The Morality Dance
G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.

salvete, omnes.

Here's a good link to a great song:

http://www.academic-
corporations.org/songs/dumlaetuscitharistainnila.html

Maybe THIS could be NR's unofficial drinking song :-)

valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25499 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Salvete Quirites, et salve Luci Sicini,

Lucius Sicinius Drusus wrote:

> As long as becoming a citizen dosen't require any more effort than
> filling out a web form and having the luck to select a Gens that is
> good about approving people we will continue to have a lot of
> "butterfly" citizens who flutter in for a short time and then flutter
> off somewhere else.

So let's do something about that. How much support do you think there'd
be for requiring some probationary period for new members before they
were granted their full citizenship? Perhaps 90 days for the new person
to study Nova Roma after they'd first applied for citizenship, after
which they'd be eligible to take some fairly simple citizenship test?

We'd have to 'grandfather' all of our current citizens in, since
otherwise it would be an ex post facto law. But we could certainly
encourage all current citizens to take the test voluntarily.

Valete Quirites,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25500 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Full Link to the Morals Song
OOPS! here's the full link. Sorry :-)


www.academic-corporations.org/songs/dumlaetuscitharistainnila.html

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25501 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
<dom.con.fus@f...> wrote:
> Ave
>
> You know, saying what Diana said is contemptable (and Cordus, is
>not an isolate case, just a few days before the election she
>suggested that Po was mentally ill and stuff).

Try to keep things in perspective. Po has said far worse things about
Diana on a semi-regular basis (not to mention about quite a few
others, though happily not in the last few weeks), part of an ongoing
mutual dislike they share. Occasionally Diana will say something too
and on this occasion she has been asked not to continue so it won 't
escalate.


> A Censor laughing at a civis (A secerdos, mind you, who maybe
>should have a slightly higher, not way lower, standard than others,
>but what's new about it after all) dropping in public sexual
>innuendos (I think that's how you call them in english, isn't it?)

Indeed. And do you REALLY think it unusual or inappropriate for a
*Sacerdos Veneris* to drop a sexual innuendo once in awhile? Just
what Goddess do you think she serves? Good Gods man, in a walk
through the real Roman forum, such comments would have been heard on
a daily basis among slave and senator alike without such prudery as
you exhibit. The only venue NR has (unofficially) that approaches the
ancient forum is the Back Alley.

However, before your sensitive nature is offended yet again, let me
emphasize that Cordus wasn't suggesting we make this a daily
occurence, just that the occasional comment be overlooked and taken
in good fun. Take his advice.

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25502 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Ave Athanasios (and all)

I do not understand you, pontifex. You can aknoweledge that the Constituion
states the Religio has to offer friendship to the other religions and approach
them synchretistically, yet you can't agree to the merest cohesistence
principle that I expressed: "Considered that all the religions are officially
welcomed, if not recognized, here, it would be nice if we could avoid harsh
judgments about them". To that, you explicitally didn't agree.

So, I do not understand how it goes: other religions are welcomed but their
moral codes and ethics can be publically slandered? And again, it was Drusus,
another pontifex, to start talking about religious moral codes, when the
discussion was about the role of teh Censores in the qntiquity, based on quotes
from classic writers.

So, again, maybe you can clear it up for me?

And again, on another post (by Drusus, if I'm not mistaken), we are being talked
of this back alley list again, sometimes as a place where humor reigns,
sometimes as a place where to get data about why cives leaves Nova Roma... Then
I shall renew my invitation, can we be pointed to the website of this list, and
can the archives of it be made public, so we can all quench our thirst of
spirited humor and joyful wiseness there? If the only way is subscribing to it,
then, how can I subscribe?

Thanx and Vale

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
PF Constantinia
Aedilis Urbis





Scrive AthanasiosofSpfd@...:

> Gaius Modius Athanasius Tiberio Galerio Paulino salutem dicit
>
> Agreed. The status of the Religio Romana is not brought into question by
> acknowledging the rights of individual citizens to believe as they wish. I
> honor
> this myself.
>
> Vale;
>
> Gaius Modius Athanasius
>
> In a message dated 7/8/2004 10:08:28 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> spqr753@... writes:
> Religio Romana is the official religion of Nova Roma but the constitution
> recognizes that citizens may have other religions and "offers friendship to
> all:... as long as their members respect the the Religio Romana and the
> citizens
> who practice it.
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25503 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
<dom.con.fus@f...> wrote:
> Ave
>
> No, indeed not, but I'd love for you to point out the list website
and make the
> archives public, if they are not already, so that myself and
everyone else can
> see what you and the others write there without having to rely on..
how was it?
> "Distorted second hand reports from someone who was there 3 years
ago"
>
> Are you up for it?

If you're that curious, why don't you just join and see for yourself?
It's open membership.

Palladius


>
> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
> PF Constantinia
> Aedilis Urbis
>
>
>
>
> Scrive "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@e...>:
>
> > Ave!
> >
> > I guess we can count on you not joining the Back Alley. :)
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25504 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: yawn (was Dignitas!)
Domitius Constantinus Fuscus wrote:

<You know, saying what Diana said is contemptable

Who me? You must mean Pompeia. I found it absolutely deplorable that she publicly declared to be a
passionate suck. LOL! So get your names straight hun, blame the source! LOL!

<A secerdos, mind you, who maybe should have a
<slightly higher, not way lower, standard than others,

Poor guy, for your sake I hope that you don't throw around that line when you are trying to pick
up a babe...

Here, let the Priestess of Venus educate you grasshopper: Sex is not a dirty thing but something
quite natural. This may come as a shock to you (sit down), but everyone here in this forum,
including you, is a result of sex.... and odds are that there was a passionate suck or two
involved in the act.

>public sexual innuendos

LOL! You should talk! Everytime I see your name, I think that it says Fucs-us

< offensive towads a note civis...
Ho Ho Ho, I won't even touch that one!

Vale,
Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25505 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Salve Consul,

I Proposed something very similar to this over two years ago before
the Socii were created.

My proposal was that a Socii class be established as an associate
membership in Nova Roma, one that would have no voting rights but
would have the right to take part in activites, and which would have
either a reduced or no tax liability.

This would be the entry point for joining Nova Roma, after 6 months as
a Socius you would be eligible to take a citizenship exam where you
would have to show some minimal knowledge of Roman History &
Government along with Nova Roman Government.

You would have the option of retaining Socii status if you prefered
that to full citizenship as I'm sure some would.

I Realize that the idea of a citizenship exam is ahistoric, but it
would over time give us a citizen base that knew more about Roma which
would make Nova Roma operate in a more historic manner. It would make
the Socii class one that contianed people who were active in some way
instead of just being a storage area for former members.

It would also give the new Socius a chance to meet people from
assorted Gens so when he did select which Gens he wished to join it
wouldn't be a matter of luck if the Gens was one that he fit into.

Of Course existing Nova Romans would be grandfathered as citizens,
though I think it would be desirable to let them opt for the Socii
class if they prefered a reduced tax liability to being able to vote.

L. Sicinius Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@c...>
wrote:
> Salvete Quirites, et salve Luci Sicini,
>
> Lucius Sicinius Drusus wrote:
>
> > As long as becoming a citizen dosen't require any more effort than
> > filling out a web form and having the luck to select a Gens that is
> > good about approving people we will continue to have a lot of
> > "butterfly" citizens who flutter in for a short time and then flutter
> > off somewhere else.
>
> So let's do something about that. How much support do you think
there'd
> be for requiring some probationary period for new members before they
> were granted their full citizenship? Perhaps 90 days for the new
person
> to study Nova Roma after they'd first applied for citizenship, after
> which they'd be eligible to take some fairly simple citizenship test?
>
> We'd have to 'grandfather' all of our current citizens in, since
> otherwise it would be an ex post facto law. But we could certainly
> encourage all current citizens to take the test voluntarily.
>
> Valete Quirites,
>
> -- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25506 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato F. Lucillae Merulae S.D.
>
> salve, Lucilla Merula.
>
> And what List might you be referring to?
>
> Whether you like it or not, whether you can find ancient sources
for
> sexual innuendo and outright pornography, it is the duty of the
> Censor to remand those who offend the dignitas of Nova Roma and its
> citizens. Our junior Censor Suffectus, L. Cornelius Sulla Felix,
>may indeed have a belly-laugh "behind the scenes" on the Back Alley
>List,
> but he is duty-bound to act in the interests of *all* citizens in
> public. The ancient Romans had a great deal of fun behind the
> scenes; in public they upheld the gravitas and dignitas of the
> State.

LOL. Please, comments such as Diana made lace the political and
public speeches of the ancient Romans. A public sexual comment would
not be worthy of attention from a censor. Have you ever seen a statue
of Priapus or the pictures of the erect phalli that adorned Roman
houses and public areas?

>Our newly-elected Censor might keep in mind the position he
> has in the public eye. He no longer has the freedom to play fast
>and loose with his own comments and opinions, at least on the public
> Lists. He represents Nova Roma, in all Her dignity and power, to
>the great masses of citizens who look to their magistrates for
>serenity and equity.

<snickers from the crowd in the forum>

;-)


Palladius

>
> vale,
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "k.a.wright" <k.a.wright@n...>
> wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "sabina_equitia_doris" <doris-butler@s...>
> >
> > > I have but little doubt but that I am merely the first to take
> > > *grave* exception to the nature of the most recent postings, and
> > > consider it both honor and duty to call them to public and
> > > magisterial attention as inappropriate and Offensive.
> >
> > LOL! Take exception to what exactly? - The sort of remark any
> Roman might
> > have made. Besides what happened to your swearing to resign from
> Nova Roma
> > after you'd tried to insist that the women's list could only
> discuss beauty,
> > clothes and housekeeping?
> >
> > Personally I much prefer the Back Alley and the fact that it's
> going strong
> > while your list seems to have totally died a death might just
seem
> to
> > suggest that other Nova Romans feel the same.
> >
> > Flavia Lucilla Merula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25507 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "FAC" <sacro_barese_impero@l...>
wrote:

> Please, Censor, Nova Roma hasn't Back Alley because it's an
> unofficial and not-authorized and not-recognized list of
> conseravtive free citizens. Back Alley is not Nova Roma!

Ironic when you think about because it's far more Roman in outlook
than this list generally is.

> It's quite funny to see that the famous traditionalist and
> conservative Boni are not defending the moral public life and the
> Dignitas inviting to an immoral and pornographical conduct. ;-)

I see consistence. It's funny to see *you* imposing your modern view
of moral life on Nova Roma.

> P.S.: Sorry for my bad english, I'm working and I have few time to
> check and correct it... :-(

Your English is perfectly understandable, Tribune.

Vale,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25508 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
G. Equitius Cato F. Lucillae Merulae D. Iunio Palladio D. Octaviae
Aventinae etc. etc. etc. S.P.D.

salvete, omnes.

Lucilla Merula, I apologize for misconstruing the direction of your
invective. But I still think a Censor should ...uhhh... be a model
of Censification in the Public Fora.

Diana --- hold on a second...are you saying that I am a product of
<shudder> SEX? My parents, my beloved pater and mater,
actually...ewwwww! That's disgusting! O tempora! O mores!

<Cato runs from the Forum with his toga over his head>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25509 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Salvete Quirites, et salve Luci Sicini,

Lucius Sicinius Drusus wrote:

> Salve Consul,
>
> I Proposed something very similar to this over two years ago before
> the Socii were created.

I think I said it was a good idea then too. Let's see if any opposition
to the general idea emerges. I don't think any will. Then we can work
out the details of the probationary period and draft a law for the
comitia to vote on.

Valete Quirites,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25510 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Martiale and the public morality
YEAH we can use some Catullus on this list! It will really upset the thought police. :)

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Gregory Rose
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 4:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Martiale and the public morality


G. Iulius Scaurus Fr. Apulo Caesari salutem dicit.

Salve, Caesar.

Shall I start posting Catullus to the list? He is, unlike Martial, a
republican poet, and I doubt he'd meet your standards of propreity.

Vale.

Scaurus




Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25511 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
This is exactly why Drusus and I have been in private conversation with a few other citizens regarding using morality as a means to silence dissent. Nova Roma seems to be heading toward a system where dissent equals treason. G-d help NR when we cannot even post poetry by Catullus anymore on the ML because it will offend those citizens who want to use their moral code as a means to silence dissent!

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: AthanasiosofSpfd@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 4:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Dignitas!


Gaius Modius Athanasius Fr. Apulo Caeser salutem dicit

Not sure I follow you. Are you saying that as Nova Romans that we should subscribe to a modern sense of morality, a morality that IS tainted by two thousand years of Christianity; a religious system that is NOT Roman.

In the United States our culture has been influenced, in part, by Puritan ideas; and an ideal that I -- personally -- reject any opportunity I can. So what sort of moral life should be advocated?

Its a matter of definition. What might be a moral life to ME might scandal you. I just returned from a nine day Pagan Festival in Southern Ohio. The event was clothing optional, and several of my friends belong to the GLBT community (GLBT is gay, lesbian, bi-sexual, and transgendered) at the event. Some, within Christian society, would claim that homosexuality is an abomination to the moral life.

So how do we define moral life?

I think too many people are uptight, and are simply using *this* as an opportunity to attack a political opponent. This is an ALL volunteer organization, nothing keeps us here save for our love of Rome. We should all try to remember that.

Vale;

Gaius Modius Athanasius
Tribunus Plebis, Flamen Pomonalis, Pontifex, Augur, and Bonus.

In a message dated 7/8/2004 6:19:23 AM Eastern Daylight Time, "FAC" <sacro_barese_impero@...> writes:

>It's quite funny to see that the famous traditionalist and
>conservative Boni are not defending the moral public life and the
>Dignitas inviting to an immoral and pornographical conduct. ;-)


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25512 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gregory Rose <gfr@w...> wrote:
> G. Iulius Scaurus Fr. Apulo Caesari salutem dicit.

> To be perfectly honest, the occasional off-colour joke is rather
>more Roman, republican or imperial, than most of what gets discussed
>here under the guise of politics.
>
> This is a tempest in a teapot, Tribune.

Indeed, but since ancient Rome is the topic of discussion for once,
this isn't all bad.

Vale,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25513 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Ave,

The Back Alley has functioned for 3-4 years perfectly fine as it has been. If you are so curious about what is on the BA you could go to www.yahoogroups.com and do a search for Back Alley and join the list. That way you will be able to view the archieves for yourself.

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Dignitas!


Ave

No, indeed not, but I'd love for you to point out the list website and make the
archives public, if they are not already, so that myself and everyone else can
see what you and the others write there without having to rely on.. how was it?
"Distorted second hand reports from someone who was there 3 years ago"

Are you up for it?

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
PF Constantinia
Aedilis Urbis




Scrive "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@...>:

> Ave!
>
> I guess we can count on you not joining the Back Alley. :)
>
> Vale,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25514 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Ave M. Traianus,

I agree! :) A sense of humor is necessary and enjoyable. Too bad some people think it is a burden that should be removed.

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Marcus Traianus Valerius
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 7:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Dignitas!


The Honorable L. Cornelius Sulla Wrote:

"LOL Some people seem to have Rome mixed up with Victorian England. Romans, both ancient and Nova, had an excellent sense of humor."

MTV: Here, Here!!! I think there are way to many people who check their sense of humor at the door when they read some of the posts on the ML. Life is to short to let small things get to you.

Ita di deaque faxint!
M. Traianus Valerius

------------------------------------------------------------
Gens Traiana Home Page
www.geocities.com/genstraiana



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25515 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Ave

I guess the people who are complaining about sexual innuendos would be actually shocked to death if they visited Pompeii and saw the phallic statues, good luck phallus's, and pictures of sexual positions in brothels that were done in public, let alone the massive amounts of Roman Graffiti.

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: deciusiunius
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 8:04 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Dignitas!


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
<dom.con.fus@f...> wrote:
> Ave
>
> You know, saying what Diana said is contemptable (and Cordus, is
>not an isolate case, just a few days before the election she
>suggested that Po was mentally ill and stuff).

Try to keep things in perspective. Po has said far worse things about
Diana on a semi-regular basis (not to mention about quite a few
others, though happily not in the last few weeks), part of an ongoing
mutual dislike they share. Occasionally Diana will say something too
and on this occasion she has been asked not to continue so it won 't
escalate.


> A Censor laughing at a civis (A secerdos, mind you, who maybe
>should have a slightly higher, not way lower, standard than others,
>but what's new about it after all) dropping in public sexual
>innuendos (I think that's how you call them in english, isn't it?)

Indeed. And do you REALLY think it unusual or inappropriate for a
*Sacerdos Veneris* to drop a sexual innuendo once in awhile? Just
what Goddess do you think she serves? Good Gods man, in a walk
through the real Roman forum, such comments would have been heard on
a daily basis among slave and senator alike without such prudery as
you exhibit. The only venue NR has (unofficially) that approaches the
ancient forum is the Back Alley.

However, before your sensitive nature is offended yet again, let me
emphasize that Cordus wasn't suggesting we make this a daily
occurence, just that the occasional comment be overlooked and taken
in good fun. Take his advice.

Palladius


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25516 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
To join the Back Alley, all you need to do is to go to www.yahoogroups.com, sign in to your username and password and do a search for Back Alley. It will show up on the search and you could join it just like any other mailing list.

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Dignitas!


Ave Athanasios (and all)

I do not understand you, pontifex. You can aknoweledge that the Constituion
states the Religio has to offer friendship to the other religions and approach
them synchretistically, yet you can't agree to the merest cohesistence
principle that I expressed: "Considered that all the religions are officially
welcomed, if not recognized, here, it would be nice if we could avoid harsh
judgments about them". To that, you explicitally didn't agree.

So, I do not understand how it goes: other religions are welcomed but their
moral codes and ethics can be publically slandered? And again, it was Drusus,
another pontifex, to start talking about religious moral codes, when the
discussion was about the role of teh Censores in the qntiquity, based on quotes
from classic writers.

So, again, maybe you can clear it up for me?

And again, on another post (by Drusus, if I'm not mistaken), we are being talked
of this back alley list again, sometimes as a place where humor reigns,
sometimes as a place where to get data about why cives leaves Nova Roma... Then
I shall renew my invitation, can we be pointed to the website of this list, and
can the archives of it be made public, so we can all quench our thirst of
spirited humor and joyful wiseness there? If the only way is subscribing to it,
then, how can I subscribe?

Thanx and Vale

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
PF Constantinia
Aedilis Urbis





Scrive AthanasiosofSpfd@...:

> Gaius Modius Athanasius Tiberio Galerio Paulino salutem dicit
>
> Agreed. The status of the Religio Romana is not brought into question by
> acknowledging the rights of individual citizens to believe as they wish. I
> honor
> this myself.
>
> Vale;
>
> Gaius Modius Athanasius
>
> In a message dated 7/8/2004 10:08:28 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> spqr753@... writes:
> Religio Romana is the official religion of Nova Roma but the constitution
> recognizes that citizens may have other religions and "offers friendship to
> all:... as long as their members respect the the Religio Romana and the
> citizens
> who practice it.
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25517 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
A. Apollonius Cordus to his friend the Consul Cn.
Equitius Marinus, and to the Senator L. Sicinius
Drusus, and to all citizens and peregrines, greetings.

> > I Proposed something very similar to this over two
> years ago before
> > the Socii were created.
>
> I think I said it was a good idea then too. Let's
> see if any opposition
> to the general idea emerges.

Allow me to 'emerge' in favour of the idea.

As I said privately to the Senator when he brought up
the idea, another useful ingredient might be to
require the probation to include membership of at
least two or three of the main NR lists, like
Latinitas, NRLaws, Religio, this list. Of course most
of the lists are privately owned, so strictly NR has
no jurisdiction; but perhaps some creative thinking
could get around that.





___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - sooooo many all-new ways to express yourself http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25518 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Roman Censors
A. Apollonius Cordus to Ti. Arcanius Agricola, and to
all citizens and peregrines, greetings.

> I noticed some disagreement as to what the Roman
> Censor did for the
> republic. It was my impression that he took the
> censes every five
> years to determine what century you voted with. I
> also thought it
> was their job to insure that those who offended the
> gods were
> prosecuted something called impiety toward the gods.

You're certainly right about the census, every five
years (though occasionally it didn't happen). I'm not
sure whether charging people with impiety was
technically part of the censors' job or not, but it's
quite possible - I'll check when I get home.

Among their other duties were the letting of contracts
for public services (such as tax-collection, and
maintenance of the roads), carrying out the lustrum (a
ritual purification to mark the end of the census),
and checking the list of senators (they could add new
ones and remove ones who had behaved improperly) and
the list of equites in the same way.

The main point which some of us disagree about is how
much of their job was concerned with making sure the
whole republic behaved properly. Senator Drusus, for
instance, thinks that I overstate the moral aspect of
the censors' duties; I think he understates it.

> ... I also
> thought that by fufilling your duty to the gods,
> family and state
> made a roman "moral". I was under the impression
> that the romans
> after the greek influx relied on secular philosophy
> for "moral"
> guidence. Am I wrong or is their more to Roman
> morality and the
> censor.

Fulfilling your duty to the gods, family, and state
would be called 'pietas', which was certainly a very
important quality for Romans. You could call it
'morality', but it would be more precise to say
something like 'dutifulness'. I think what Senator
Drusus is saying is that the Romans didn't have a
single, umbrella-like idea of 'morality' - they had a
variety of qualities which they found admirable,
including 'pietas'. And yes, they did also take ideas
from philosophy, or at least some of them did. Others
(Cato the elder, for instance) were not very keen on
philosophy.

> Tiberious Arcana Agricola(if I should ever get my
> citizenship, which
> I have been trying to do since may...not that I am
> complaining, the
> censor is on it :))
>
> PS is the male form of Arcanus arcana

Arcanus is the male form; but it was normal for a
Roman's 'nomen' (middle name) to end in -ius rather
than -us, so you might try 'Arcanius'. Just a
suggestion. :)





___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - sooooo many all-new ways to express yourself http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25519 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Salve Consul,

I'm not going to be a stickler over the time period, if 90 days solves
the "Butterfly" problem, then that's fine with me, if not it can
always be adjusted upwards at a later date.

I'm sure it will require some adjustments after it's enacted and we
see how it operates. I Certainlly don't claim any ability to forsee
all problems that might arise from this change in our "Naturalization"
procedures.

Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@c...>
wrote:
> Salvete Quirites, et salve Luci Sicini,
>
> Lucius Sicinius Drusus wrote:
>
> > Salve Consul,
> >
> > I Proposed something very similar to this over two years ago before
> > the Socii were created.
>
> I think I said it was a good idea then too. Let's see if any
opposition
> to the general idea emerges. I don't think any will. Then we can work
> out the details of the probationary period and draft a law for the
> comitia to vote on.
>
> Valete Quirites,
>
> -- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25520 From: Marcus Traianus Valerius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Salve Consul,

I think that L. Sicinius Drusus has a fantastic idea here, the question that I would have is, would Nova Roma offer some sort of group or mailing list to supplement the new citizen (as well as older citizen's) knowledge of Roma and Nova Roma?

Omnium rerum principia parva sunt
M. Traianus Valerius


----- Original Message -----
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Citizens leaving


Salvete Quirites, et salve Luci Sicini,

Lucius Sicinius Drusus wrote:

> Salve Consul,
>
> I Proposed something very similar to this over two years ago before
> the Socii were created.

I think I said it was a good idea then too. Let's see if any opposition
to the general idea emerges. I don't think any will. Then we can work
out the details of the probationary period and draft a law for the
comitia to vote on.

Valete Quirites,

-- Marinus


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25521 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Out of Pocket
Salvete Omnes,

For any who may care ;-), I will be away with only sporadic internet
access until July 19th.

Valete,

Gaius Popillius Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25522 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Ave Sulla and Palladius

Amazing as it is, I did do it yesterday out of curiosity (I actually didn't even
know about the BA until a few days ago) and guess what? 37 groups came out, but
not the Nova Roma Back Alley list. Now I found it, and it's not a surprise I
couldn't before, considering that among those 37 (a couple being porn exchange
mailing lists and another being a Harry Potter one) it's the pretty anonymous
groups that describes itself as "the back alley reborn".

Now that I'm on it, I admit it's an inteesting reading.. it's not an everyday
thing to have a Censor automatically calling a Consul with belittling names and
portraing both the consules as eager to stage a coup, a Pontifex calling
Marinus a Fhurer and a nazi, all spiced up with abundant doses of anti-catholic
and baptist oil.. and that just in the last week :) Yeah, it makes for a very
good and enlightening reading.

I again think you should make the archives public, for the benefit of everyone.

Oh, for the curious ones (given that with 3 requests, still I couldn't get the
nicity of the address published, was it that hard to write it?), it's at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BackAlley/

Vale


Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
PF Constantinia
Aedilis Urbis




Scrive "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@...>:

> To join the Back Alley, all you need to do is to go to www.yahoogroups.com,
> sign in to your username and password and do a search for Back Alley. It
> will show up on the search and you could join it just like any other mailing
> list.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25523 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Salvete Quirites, et salve Marce Traiane,

Marcus Traianus Valerius wrote:

> Salve Consul,
>
> I think that L. Sicinius Drusus has a fantastic idea here,

Yes, I think it'd be a step in the right direction. Furthermore, I
think that most of the people who objected to the idea two years ago
have either changed their minds or departed.

> the question that I would have is, would Nova Roma offer
> some sort of group or mailing list to supplement the new
> citizen (as well as older citizen's) knowledge of Roma and Nova Roma?

There's an Introduction to Nova Roma class that the Academia Thules runs
a couple of times every year. If that didn't prove sufficient we could
supplement it with something like a mailing list for newcomers.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25524 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
A. Apollonius Cordus to the Consular & Senator L.
Cornelius Sulla Felix, and to all citizens and
peregrines, greetings.

> This is exactly why Drusus and I have been in
> private conversation with a few other citizens
> regarding using morality as a means to silence
> dissent. Nova Roma seems to be heading toward a
> system where dissent equals treason.

Yes, I noticed you'd been saying that, and it worries
me a little. Do you really think so? I can't see any
sign of it myself, but maybe I don't dissent enough.

Seriously, this isn't something to say lightly. Are
there people who are genuinely worried about being
accused of treason just for airing their views? If
there are, I encourage them please to contact me
privately.

There may not be much I can do, but I'll do my best,
because that sort of thing is totally intolerable, as
I'm sure everyone here will agree.





___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - sooooo many all-new ways to express yourself http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25525 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
<dom.con.fus@f...> wrote:

> a Pontifex calling
> Marinus a Fhurer and a nazi, all spiced up with abundant doses of
anti-catholic
> and baptist oil.. and that just in the last week :) Yeah, it makes
for a very
> good and enlightening reading.

It's a bit of Satire, in this case "In Der Fuhrer's Face" a funny song
from the Second World War with the words changed a bit to poke a
little humor at Nova Roma's Leadership. Walt Disney made a Donald Duck
Cartoon from the same song.

If you stick around you will find that I tagged Sulla with "The
Godfather" after the gangster in the movie of the same name. Everybody
is a target in the Back Alley, including me.

Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25526 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
And once again, I will state that if anyone has an interest in the Back alley they can join and read the archieves for themselves.

Oh and don't forget Dex's story about Audens Strip search in the Vatican.....that one is a classic, though I think that was from the original Back Alley, not the current one.

Thanks for posting the Link Fuscus, we can use all the advertisement we can get.....Considering there is no such thing as bad publicity! :)

And as Drusus said we are all open targets on the BA.

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Dignitas!


Ave Sulla and Palladius

Amazing as it is, I did do it yesterday out of curiosity (I actually didn't even
know about the BA until a few days ago) and guess what? 37 groups came out, but
not the Nova Roma Back Alley list. Now I found it, and it's not a surprise I
couldn't before, considering that among those 37 (a couple being porn exchange
mailing lists and another being a Harry Potter one) it's the pretty anonymous
groups that describes itself as "the back alley reborn".

Now that I'm on it, I admit it's an inteesting reading.. it's not an everyday
thing to have a Censor automatically calling a Consul with belittling names and
portraing both the consules as eager to stage a coup, a Pontifex calling
Marinus a Fhurer and a nazi, all spiced up with abundant doses of anti-catholic
and baptist oil.. and that just in the last week :) Yeah, it makes for a very
good and enlightening reading.

I again think you should make the archives public, for the benefit of everyone.

Oh, for the curious ones (given that with 3 requests, still I couldn't get the
nicity of the address published, was it that hard to write it?), it's at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BackAlley/

Vale


Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
PF Constantinia
Aedilis Urbis




Scrive "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@...>:

> To join the Back Alley, all you need to do is to go to www.yahoogroups.com,
> sign in to your username and password and do a search for Back Alley. It
> will show up on the search and you could join it just like any other mailing
> list.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25527 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
Too bad some people seem to lack a sense of humor. I hope the BA gives Fuscus a sense of humor...its really helpful and quite enjoyable.

Vale,

Sulla


----- Original Message -----
From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 10:00 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Dignitas!


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
<dom.con.fus@f...> wrote:

> a Pontifex calling
> Marinus a Fhurer and a nazi, all spiced up with abundant doses of
anti-catholic
> and baptist oil.. and that just in the last week :) Yeah, it makes
for a very
> good and enlightening reading.

It's a bit of Satire, in this case "In Der Fuhrer's Face" a funny song
from the Second World War with the words changed a bit to poke a
little humor at Nova Roma's Leadership. Walt Disney made a Donald Duck
Cartoon from the same song.

If you stick around you will find that I tagged Sulla with "The
Godfather" after the gangster in the movie of the same name. Everybody
is a target in the Back Alley, including me.

Drusus


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25528 From: Marcus Bianchius Antonius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
How about a citizen registry of some kind? Why can't we just have each citizen "register" every other year (just like the gens) so they can stay a citizen. That would help out the Propraetors also, because if you register, then we would only have to try to contact the people who have not registered during the registration peroid. If the citizen fails to register or contact the propraetor then drop them after 2 years or something. This puts the responsiblity on the citizen and also allows them to remain as active or inactive as they wish.

Just a thought.

MBA

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
Salvete Quirites, et salve Marce Traiane,

Marcus Traianus Valerius wrote:

> Salve Consul,
>
> I think that L. Sicinius Drusus has a fantastic idea here,

Yes, I think it'd be a step in the right direction. Furthermore, I
think that most of the people who objected to the idea two years ago
have either changed their minds or departed.

> the question that I would have is, would Nova Roma offer
> some sort of group or mailing list to supplement the new
> citizen (as well as older citizen's) knowledge of Roma and Nova Roma?

There's an Introduction to Nova Roma class that the Academia Thules runs
a couple of times every year. If that didn't prove sufficient we could
supplement it with something like a mailing list for newcomers.

Valete,

-- Marinus



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25529 From: Agrippina Modia Aurelia Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Salvete,

> So let's do something about that. How much support do you think
there'd
> be for requiring some probationary period for new members before
they
> were granted their full citizenship? Perhaps 90 days for the new
person
> to study Nova Roma after they'd first applied for citizenship,
after
> which they'd be eligible to take some fairly simple citizenship
test?

That is a great idea! We could leave them all in gens Nemo until
they pass the test. That will give them time to really decide on a
gens they feel comfortable with. It will also weed out all the
applicants we get from war-torn countries who think NR is a real
country they can escape to as well as those who think it would be
neat thing to do for a week. While I realize there is no historical
precedence for this, I think it would strengthen our future
population base.

Valete,

Agrippina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25530 From: Agrippina Modia Aurelia Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Salvete,

LOL! Sorry everyone, I should have read this post before I wrote
mine.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Sicinius Drusus"
<drusus@b...> wrote:
> Salve Consul,
>
> I Proposed something very similar to this over two years ago before
> the Socii were created.
>
> My proposal was that a Socii class be established as an associate
> membership in Nova Roma, one that would have no voting rights but
> would have the right to take part in activites, and which would
have
> either a reduced or no tax liability.

[snipped for brevity]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25531 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.

salvete, omnes.

Constantinus Fuscus! Back slowly away from the Censor and pontiff;
just smile and nod at them. They're only trying to get your goat.
They got mine but then I realized that having one wasn't so great
anyways.

Sicinius Drusus, once again I am dumbfounded --- I agree
wholeheartedly with the probationary period/citizenship test idea,
which means that I <gasp> agree with *you*. Surely this is an
incontrovertible Sign of the End Times. But seriously, the idea of
waiting for a certain amount of time will be a good start at weaning
out those who are serious and those who are not. And I don't think
it's too much to ask that a citizen know *something* about Rome and
her history.

Questions:

1. who would write the Test?
2. how would it be administered?
3. who would "grade" it?
4. what happens if someone failed it? Could we feed them to he
wolves? Or toss 'em off the Tarpeian Rock? Or force them to map out
the grammatical structure of one of Apollonius Cordus' posts?

valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25532 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Salvete Quirites, et salve Marce Bianchi,

Marcus Bianchius Antonius wrote:

> How about a citizen registry of some kind? Why can't we
> just have each citizen "register" every other year (just
> like the gens) so they can stay a citizen.

I think that is exactly what last year's Censors did. If Marcus
Octavius Germanicus left all the hooks in place, I imagine it could be
done again.

As a provincial governor I agree that making the process more direct is
a very good thing.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25533 From: Marcus Traianus Valerius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Salve!

I don't think this is a good idea. Family is the basic foundation of Nova Roma and I believe that it can help a citizen fit in right away and feel they are part of something.

Vale!
Ita di deaque faxint!
Marcus Traianus Valerius

------------------------------------------------------------
Gens Traiana Home Page
www.geocities.com/genstraiana
----- Original Message -----
From: Agrippina Modia Aurelia
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 12:24 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Citizens leaving


Salvete,

> So let's do something about that. How much support do you think
there'd
> be for requiring some probationary period for new members before
they
> were granted their full citizenship? Perhaps 90 days for the new
person
> to study Nova Roma after they'd first applied for citizenship,
after
> which they'd be eligible to take some fairly simple citizenship
test?

That is a great idea! We could leave them all in gens Nemo until
they pass the test. That will give them time to really decide on a
gens they feel comfortable with. It will also weed out all the
applicants we get from war-torn countries who think NR is a real
country they can escape to as well as those who think it would be
neat thing to do for a week. While I realize there is no historical
precedence for this, I think it would strengthen our future
population base.

Valete,

Agrippina




Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25534 From: Marcus Traianus Valerius Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Salve!

And I should have read yours :P

Pax!

----- Original Message -----
From: Agrippina Modia Aurelia
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 12:27 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Citizens leaving


Salvete,

LOL! Sorry everyone, I should have read this post before I wrote
mine.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Sicinius Drusus"
<drusus@b...> wrote:
> Salve Consul,
>
> I Proposed something very similar to this over two years ago before
> the Socii were created.
>
> My proposal was that a Socii class be established as an associate
> membership in Nova Roma, one that would have no voting rights but
> would have the right to take part in activites, and which would
have
> either a reduced or no tax liability.

[snipped for brevity]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25535 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Salvete Senator Druse et omnes,

Your idea of a citizenship test and a graduated probationary period
is a good idea that has crossed my mind as well as others before.
Any test or exam over the internet would have to be open book style
of course so you would think that if one was not ambitious enough to
hit the encyclopedias or internet sites to find the answers, their
dedication to Rome would be certainly questionable.

Now I'm sure that an implementation of this type of system would
certainly not bring massive hordes kicking down the gates of Res
Republica to become citizens but the few we would get over time
might prove to be of better quality and more dedicated to Nova Roma.


Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus








--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Sicinius Drusus"
<drusus@b...> wrote:
> Salve Consul,
>
> I Proposed something very similar to this over two years ago before
> the Socii were created.
>
> My proposal was that a Socii class be established as an associate
> membership in Nova Roma, one that would have no voting rights but
> would have the right to take part in activites, and which would
have
> either a reduced or no tax liability.
>
> This would be the entry point for joining Nova Roma, after 6
months as
> a Socius you would be eligible to take a citizenship exam where you
> would have to show some minimal knowledge of Roman History &
> Government along with Nova Roman Government.
>
> You would have the option of retaining Socii status if you prefered
> that to full citizenship as I'm sure some would.
>
> I Realize that the idea of a citizenship exam is ahistoric, but it
> would over time give us a citizen base that knew more about Roma
which
> would make Nova Roma operate in a more historic manner. It would
make
> the Socii class one that contianed people who were active in some
way
> instead of just being a storage area for former members.
>
> It would also give the new Socius a chance to meet people from
> assorted Gens so when he did select which Gens he wished to join it
> wouldn't be a matter of luck if the Gens was one that he fit into.
>
> Of Course existing Nova Romans would be grandfathered as citizens,
> though I think it would be desirable to let them opt for the Socii
> class if they prefered a reduced tax liability to being able to
vote.
>
> L. Sicinius Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25536 From: Lucius Sicinius Drusus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:

>
> Questions:
>
> 1. who would write the Test?

Hopefully some of our more knowledgable citizens will.

> 2. how would it be administered?

On Line, 100 random Questions from a 1000 Question data base.

> 3. who would "grade" it?

A Computer

> 4. what happens if someone failed it? Could we feed them to he
> wolves? Or toss 'em off the Tarpeian Rock? Or force them to map out
> the grammatical structure of one of Apollonius Cordus' posts?

They have to read ALL of Formy's posts in the Archives

Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25537 From: David Bustillos Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Salve,
I joined because I am a pagen and i like Roma. I just came back from
Iraq and the same tiresome agruments are still going on as when I
left. Dosen't antone read the Nova Roma website or do all that
partake of these arguments think that it is fluff.
Vale,
Lucius Martianius Paullus
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
> Salvete Senator Druse et omnes,
>
> Your idea of a citizenship test and a graduated probationary period
> is a good idea that has crossed my mind as well as others before.
> Any test or exam over the internet would have to be open book style
> of course so you would think that if one was not ambitious enough
to
> hit the encyclopedias or internet sites to find the answers, their
> dedication to Rome would be certainly questionable.
>
> Now I'm sure that an implementation of this type of system would
> certainly not bring massive hordes kicking down the gates of Res
> Republica to become citizens but the few we would get over time
> might prove to be of better quality and more dedicated to Nova Roma.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Sicinius Drusus"
> <drusus@b...> wrote:
> > Salve Consul,
> >
> > I Proposed something very similar to this over two years ago
before
> > the Socii were created.
> >
> > My proposal was that a Socii class be established as an associate
> > membership in Nova Roma, one that would have no voting rights but
> > would have the right to take part in activites, and which would
> have
> > either a reduced or no tax liability.
> >
> > This would be the entry point for joining Nova Roma, after 6
> months as
> > a Socius you would be eligible to take a citizenship exam where
you
> > would have to show some minimal knowledge of Roman History &
> > Government along with Nova Roman Government.
> >
> > You would have the option of retaining Socii status if you
prefered
> > that to full citizenship as I'm sure some would.
> >
> > I Realize that the idea of a citizenship exam is ahistoric, but it
> > would over time give us a citizen base that knew more about Roma
> which
> > would make Nova Roma operate in a more historic manner. It would
> make
> > the Socii class one that contianed people who were active in some
> way
> > instead of just being a storage area for former members.
> >
> > It would also give the new Socius a chance to meet people from
> > assorted Gens so when he did select which Gens he wished to join
it
> > wouldn't be a matter of luck if the Gens was one that he fit into.
> >
> > Of Course existing Nova Romans would be grandfathered as citizens,
> > though I think it would be desirable to let them opt for the Socii
> > class if they prefered a reduced tax liability to being able to
> vote.
> >
> > L. Sicinius Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25538 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Salve Illustris Propraetor!

This already exists, it is called the "Census" and it is an old Roman
tradition. But in this system the Censors go through the rolls with
the assistance of the Governors (Proconsuls and Propraetors). Please
see http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2003-05-31-i.html

>How about a citizen registry of some kind? Why can't we just have
>each citizen "register" every other year (just like the gens) so
>they can stay a citizen. That would help out the Propraetors also,
>because if you register, then we would only have to try to contact
>the people who have not registered during the registration peroid.
>If the citizen fails to register or contact the propraetor then drop
>them after 2 years or something. This puts the responsiblity on the
>citizen and also allows them to remain as active or inactive as they
>wish.
>
>Just a thought.
>
>MBA

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25539 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Ave!

Nope its far to difficult to do that. :) It is far easier to continue beating dead horses til there is nothing left.

Glad your back safe from Iraq!

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: David Bustillos
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 11:19 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Citizens leaving


Salve,
I joined because I am a pagen and i like Roma. I just came back from
Iraq and the same tiresome agruments are still going on as when I
left. Dosen't antone read the Nova Roma website or do all that
partake of these arguments think that it is fluff.
Vale,
Lucius Martianius Paullus
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
> Salvete Senator Druse et omnes,
>
> Your idea of a citizenship test and a graduated probationary period
> is a good idea that has crossed my mind as well as others before.
> Any test or exam over the internet would have to be open book style
> of course so you would think that if one was not ambitious enough
to
> hit the encyclopedias or internet sites to find the answers, their
> dedication to Rome would be certainly questionable.
>
> Now I'm sure that an implementation of this type of system would
> certainly not bring massive hordes kicking down the gates of Res
> Republica to become citizens but the few we would get over time
> might prove to be of better quality and more dedicated to Nova Roma.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Sicinius Drusus"
> <drusus@b...> wrote:
> > Salve Consul,
> >
> > I Proposed something very similar to this over two years ago
before
> > the Socii were created.
> >
> > My proposal was that a Socii class be established as an associate
> > membership in Nova Roma, one that would have no voting rights but
> > would have the right to take part in activites, and which would
> have
> > either a reduced or no tax liability.
> >
> > This would be the entry point for joining Nova Roma, after 6
> months as
> > a Socius you would be eligible to take a citizenship exam where
you
> > would have to show some minimal knowledge of Roman History &
> > Government along with Nova Roman Government.
> >
> > You would have the option of retaining Socii status if you
prefered
> > that to full citizenship as I'm sure some would.
> >
> > I Realize that the idea of a citizenship exam is ahistoric, but it
> > would over time give us a citizen base that knew more about Roma
> which
> > would make Nova Roma operate in a more historic manner. It would
> make
> > the Socii class one that contianed people who were active in some
> way
> > instead of just being a storage area for former members.
> >
> > It would also give the new Socius a chance to meet people from
> > assorted Gens so when he did select which Gens he wished to join
it
> > wouldn't be a matter of luck if the Gens was one that he fit into.
> >
> > Of Course existing Nova Romans would be grandfathered as citizens,
> > though I think it would be desirable to let them opt for the Socii
> > class if they prefered a reduced tax liability to being able to
> vote.
> >
> > L. Sicinius Drusus


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25540 From: David Bustillos Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Citizens leaving
Salve Sulla,
A few nips and scraps, but I am good. They have offered me a new
contract-but I am to be married this Feb. She's put up with enough
stuff, so that I had to come home. Between the Marines, Croatia and
this tour I can not ask her to put up with another.
Lucius
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla"
<alexious@e...> wrote:
> Ave!
>
> Nope its far to difficult to do that. :) It is far easier to
continue beating dead horses til there is nothing left.
>
> Glad your back safe from Iraq!
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Bustillos
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 11:19 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Citizens leaving
>
>
> Salve,
> I joined because I am a pagen and i like Roma. I just came back
from
> Iraq and the same tiresome agruments are still going on as when I
> left. Dosen't antone read the Nova Roma website or do all that
> partake of these arguments think that it is fluff.
> Vale,
> Lucius Martianius Paullus
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus
(Michael
> Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
> > Salvete Senator Druse et omnes,
> >
> > Your idea of a citizenship test and a graduated probationary
period
> > is a good idea that has crossed my mind as well as others
before.
> > Any test or exam over the internet would have to be open book
style
> > of course so you would think that if one was not ambitious
enough
> to
> > hit the encyclopedias or internet sites to find the answers,
their
> > dedication to Rome would be certainly questionable.
> >
> > Now I'm sure that an implementation of this type of system
would
> > certainly not bring massive hordes kicking down the gates of
Res
> > Republica to become citizens but the few we would get over time
> > might prove to be of better quality and more dedicated to Nova
Roma.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Quintus Lanius Paulinus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Sicinius Drusus"
> > <drusus@b...> wrote:
> > > Salve Consul,
> > >
> > > I Proposed something very similar to this over two years ago
> before
> > > the Socii were created.
> > >
> > > My proposal was that a Socii class be established as an
associate
> > > membership in Nova Roma, one that would have no voting rights
but
> > > would have the right to take part in activites, and which
would
> > have
> > > either a reduced or no tax liability.
> > >
> > > This would be the entry point for joining Nova Roma, after 6
> > months as
> > > a Socius you would be eligible to take a citizenship exam
where
> you
> > > would have to show some minimal knowledge of Roman History &
> > > Government along with Nova Roman Government.
> > >
> > > You would have the option of retaining Socii status if you
> prefered
> > > that to full citizenship as I'm sure some would.
> > >
> > > I Realize that the idea of a citizenship exam is ahistoric,
but it
> > > would over time give us a citizen base that knew more about
Roma
> > which
> > > would make Nova Roma operate in a more historic manner. It
would
> > make
> > > the Socii class one that contianed people who were active in
some
> > way
> > > instead of just being a storage area for former members.
> > >
> > > It would also give the new Socius a chance to meet people from
> > > assorted Gens so when he did select which Gens he wished to
join
> it
> > > wouldn't be a matter of luck if the Gens was one that he fit
into.
> > >
> > > Of Course existing Nova Romans would be grandfathered as
citizens,
> > > though I think it would be desirable to let them opt for the
Socii
> > > class if they prefered a reduced tax liability to being able
to
> > vote.
> > >
> > > L. Sicinius Drusus
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25541 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Re: Dignitas, moral and Bacchanalia
In a message dated 7/8/04 4:35:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
christer.edling@... writes:

> seem to remember that the Senate suppressed the Bacchanalia in 186
> B.C. Didn't that have anything to do with morals?
> --
>

An early import of Hellenism was the God Dionysus of the
vineyards and the vintage, who became identified with Bacchus,
the Roman god of drink and drunkenness.

Not that anybody would even THINK of paying homage to him
here in NR.

Anyway, Bacchus' cult made its first appearance soon after the war
with Hannibal. (Seems like lots of things, all bad, came after the Punic
War.)
It was ignored except as a diverson until 187 BCE. Then it got national
attention.

Livius tells us it was a plot to murder a Patrician that exposed the whole
cult scrutiny of the Senate.
It seems the stepfather of a rich young Patrician named Aebutius, soon to
come of age, had been stealing the boys investments and was now faced with the
danger of exposure. His only options were to kill the boy or find some way of
blackmailing him into silence.
Therefore, the young man's mother, who had as much to lose asked him to
please her by becoming an initiate of Bacchus, and he agreed.
But what the conspirators failed to take in account, was that he mentioned
the matter to his mistress, a seasoned ex-prostitute named Hispala.
"The gods forbid!" she cried. Aebtius pressured her into revealing what she
knew. He then took his findings to the Praetor Urbanus.
The cult held a thrice-yearly mystery festival for women administered by
respectable matrons when first . Then, under pretense of divine prophecy, this had
been changed to a mixed festival . Men were admitted, and the festivals held
under cover of darkness five times a month. During this time all emotional
and sexual restraints were removed and the overriding law was that all the laws
of ordinary life should be ignored . Raving women, discipline lost, ran
screaming down to the Tiber to plunge burning torches into the river and bring them
out again, miraculously, still afire. The men, ecstatic, incoherent, devoted
themselves to the initiates, young men under twenty whom they as Livius
directly put it "forcibly penetrated." In this extremely sexually charged
atmosphere, murder was the natural result for any initiate who struggled against getting
ravished.. And this was exactly what Aebutius' stepfather had planned for
the young man, as Hispala suspected.
Under torture (After all she was a slave) Hispala's disclosures to Praetor in
turn had the Senate order the arrest of 7,000 people (probably a little less,
Romans like to round off numbers). Many of the accused came from ennobled
families. The men who guilty of breaking the Law were tried before the Comitia as
a threat against the state, and condemned to death (likely beheading.) The
women were returned to their Paterfamilias who were responsible for seeing
justice done (not good for those women, likely enforced starvation).
It appeared that all participants were fellow conspirators, who helped to
encourage or cover up for other kinds of crime, such as murder, false witness,
forging will and documents.
It sounds like the Senate was dealing with a case of organized crime which
flaunted Roman Law. Morals were the least of their problems.
So the Senate issued a SC, not forbidding the worship of Bacchus which was
not the Senate's function but forbidding the worship in large groups for the
good of the citizens and the State. The The largest group allowed was no more
than three women and two men and even then only to those dependencies not subject
to Roman law.

(Livius 39. 9.)

So what does this have to do with what happened in NR? Why absolutely
nothing!
Nobody has been murdered due the cult of Venus. Our Sacedotes of Venus made
an off color remark. She serves the Goddess of Love, people. She is not a
nun, nor does she pretend to be.
She is not a servant of Vestal that cold prudish hearth goddess, but of
Venus, warm, alive, sexual... I hope this puts those remarks in context for you
all.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25542 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Apology
Since I am now on moderation on the Main list and it seems the Religio romana list as well, I
would like to humbly apologize to all on the Mainlist who were offended by my use of the term
'suck'.

Vale,
Diana Octavia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 25543 From: Censored Diana Date: 2004-07-08
Subject: Resignation
Salvete,

Since my last email to the Main list was edited by the dual Consul/Praetor Marinus which turned my
sarcastic apology into a sincere one, I hereby submit my resignation as Quaestor effective
immediately. I no longer wish to spend even one moment of my spare time working for an
organization that has no freedom of speech and where the spoken word is dealt with by threats of
ridiculous lawsuits.

Since this email is also likely to be Censored by our dual Consul/Praetor Marinus, I am cc'ing the
Senate where he does not have moderator priviledges. It is time that the Senate put a leash on
this gentleman, before you have no magistrates left.

I will forward my last financial spreadsheet to I Iulius as soon as possible since I have no
quarrel with him and do not wish to cause even the slightest disruption to his Magna Mater
project.

Valete,
Diana Octavia