Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Aug 13-16, 2004

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27512 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27513 From: Maxima Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27514 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27515 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27516 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27517 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27518 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27519 From: Maxima Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27520 From: Maxima Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27521 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27522 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund--Aurelianus to Maxima.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27523 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27524 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27525 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27526 From: Gaius Ambrosius Artorus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27527 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27528 From: Mike Abboud Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27529 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27530 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27531 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27532 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27533 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27534 From: Samantha Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27535 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27536 From: Samantha Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27537 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27538 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Lands from taxation.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27539 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Lands from taxation.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27540 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27541 From: Samantha Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27542 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Again the Pactum de convento Novae Romae in Europa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27543 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Again the Pactum de convento Novae Romae in Europa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27544 From: Greg Rose Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27545 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: And there was a roman dinner...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27546 From: Agrippina Modia Aurelia Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27547 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27548 From: Marcus Quirinus Sulla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: cena tiberina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27549 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27550 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27551 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27552 From: Maxima Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27553 From: Maxima Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27554 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27555 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27556 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27557 From: GAIVS IVLIANVS Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: BONA NEMORALIA!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27558 From: k.a.wright Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27559 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Lands from taxation.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27560 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27561 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27562 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27563 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27564 From: Jason Nickerson Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Lands from taxation.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27565 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Lands from taxation.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27566 From: Kaelus Iulius Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27567 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27568 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27569 From: Jason Nickerson Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Lands from taxation.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27570 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27571 From: GAIVS IVLIANVS Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Concordia, the last Vestal?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27572 From: Rodacilla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Concordia, the last Vestal?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27573 From: Mike Abboud Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27574 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Results of voting in the Comita Centuriata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27575 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Results of voting in the Comita Populi Tributa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27576 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Congratulations Illustris Gaius Popillius Laenas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27577 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Congratulations Illustris Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27578 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Congratulations Illustris Quintus Cassius Calvus!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27579 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Honorable Pompeia Minuciua-Tiberia Strabo!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27580 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Honorable Domitius Constantinus Fuscus!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27581 From: FAC Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: (no subject)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27582 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Congratulations to the new magistrates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27583 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: ROMANS: A Proposed Constitutional amendment for your review and com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27584 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27585 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Aurelianus to Cato & Nick
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27586 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27587 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27588 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27589 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Congratulations Laenas! : Results of voting in the Comita Centuriata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27590 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: Results of voting in the Comita Populi Tributa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27591 From: Kaelus Iulius Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Nemoralia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27592 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: Results of voting in the Comita Centuriata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27593 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: Results of voting in the Comita Populi Tributa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27594 From: Samantha Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: How I celebrated Nemoralia.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27595 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27596 From: Decimus Iunius Silanus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: Results of voting in the Comita Centuriata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27597 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: Results of voting in the Comita Centuriata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27598 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27599 From: Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: How I celebrated Nemoralia.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27600 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: My Thanks
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27601 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Oath of Office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27602 From: Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: Nemoralia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27603 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Investment of Imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27604 From: Greg Rose Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Investment of Imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27605 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Investment of Imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27606 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Edictum Proconsulare de Creatione Magistri Araneari
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27607 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27608 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: Investment of Imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27609 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Oath of Office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27610 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Edict of appointment of Scriba
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27611 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Thank you's and other stuff
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27612 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Investment of Imperium; Witnessing of Priesthood Appointments
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27613 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27614 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27615 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Fw: SPQR Ring
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27616 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27617 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27618 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27619 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27620 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27621 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: RE Rome's defeats
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27622 From: Casta Meretrix Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27623 From: Casta Meretrix Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Investment of Imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27624 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27625 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27626 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Re: Investment of Imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27627 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Re: RE Romes defeats
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27628 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Re: RE Romes defeats
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27629 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Re: RE Romes defeats
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27630 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27631 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27632 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Re: RE Romes defeats
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27633 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Investment of Imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27634 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27635 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27636 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27637 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27638 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27639 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27640 From: Pompeius Minius Aquila Palladius Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: IUSIURANDUM - Scriba Propraetoris P. Minius Aquila Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27641 From: Ocellina Minia Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Iusiurandum - Scriba Propraetoris Aelia Minia Ocellina Marocia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27642 From: Messalina Minia Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Iusiurandum - Scriba Propraetoris Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27643 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27644 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27645 From: pictominius Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Iusiurandum - Scriba Propraetoris Atrius Minius Pictor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27646 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27647 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27648 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27649 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27650 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27651 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Absence
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27652 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27653 From: Caius Curius Saturninus Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: meeting at Regio Finnica at the end of July, diary and photos
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27654 From: Casta Meretrix Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: meeting at Regio Finnica at the end of July, diary and photos
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27655 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: meeting at Regio Finnica at the end of July, diary and photos
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27656 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: Absence
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27657 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: The true heirs of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27658 From: L. Modius Kaelus Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27659 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: meeting at Regio Finnica at the end of July, diary and photos
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27660 From: Teleri Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: Investment of Imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27661 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: A Warning
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27662 From: jmath669642reng@webtv.net Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27663 From: Daniel Dreesbach Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Investment of Imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27664 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: The true heirs of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27665 From: jmath669642reng@webtv.net Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Investment of Imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27666 From: Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27667 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: meeting at Regio Finnica at the end of July, diary and photos
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27668 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Results of the Plebiscite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27669 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: meeting at Regio Finnica at the end of July, diary and photos
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27670 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Praetorian Edict
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27671 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: The philosophy of the Boni (WAS: Senator Sulla- The End
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27672 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: Where is Scaurus?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27673 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27674 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27675 From: Galus Agorius Taurinus Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Greetings! Gens Agoria's Home Page is up and running...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27676 From: Samantha Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27677 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: meeting at Regio Finnica at the end of July, diary and photos
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27678 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27679 From: Samantha Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27680 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27681 From: k.a.wright Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27682 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27683 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27684 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27685 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27686 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27687 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27512 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice
Very excellent post, Venator! I totally agree with you 100%!

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Stefn Ullarsson
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 9:03 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Note on animal sacrifice


Valetudo quod fortuna,

I have killed and will continue to kill animals for food.
I have killed and will continue to kill animals to protect life and
property;
just as I have and would use deadly force against a human threat.

I have and will continue to stop while driving (when safe for me and
other traffic)
to avoid killing or hurting an animal unnecessarily.

I have and will continue to own pets, which I hold very dear to my heart.
I have and will continue to regard humans, who I hold very dear to my heart.

I have and will continue to report to the proper authorities those who
kill or hurt animals to no good purpose.
I have and will continue to do the same for a man, woman or child.

I am an omnivore whose diet is heavy on animal source food.
I am an omnivore who likewise kills plants for food.

I find the concept that animals have rights, inane.

I do, however, believe that I have certain responsibilities to any being
under my power and authority, whether human or lower animal.

There is a distinct difference.

My beloved cats can not frame thoughtful arguments about abstract
concepts such as rights, life, death, sacredness, etc.
At the very least; they do not communicate in intellectual terms, which
have any meaning within human concepts.

I will cry for them when they die, or I have them euthanized, like I
have other pets who have died or I have had the vet put down.

I have and will continue to believe that I have certain duties to That
Which I hold Holy.

If I should take the decision that the Holy should like to receive the
life of an animal within a sacral context, an animal will die.

A man is not a cat, is not a pig, is not a rat...

I take offense to the thought that a nonhuman's being's life is as
valuable as mine.

I refuse to believe that a human who is fully aware to the full cycle of
life can believe that my life has the same worth as my cat's.

Yes, one can take the impression that I hold "moral relativism" as
worthless.

If an ape dies to make sure I have safer medicines, so be it.
If a rat dies so that neurological science advances, so be it.
If a pig dies so that I can have bacon for breakfast, so be it.
If a cow dies so that I might give a Sacral Gift to the Holy, and
provide a sumptuous feast to kin and kith, so be it.

I for one will continue to benefit from the death of animals.

And, I shall continue to be grateful for their lives.

For if I am ungrateful and do not acknowledge the lives lost to make
mine possible, the Holy Powers will turn Their grace from me.

All life feeds on life.

In amicitia quod fides - Venator


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27513 From: Maxima Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
John Dobbins <drusus@...> wrote:
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Maxima <violetphearsen@y...> wrote:


> But that is just the point. It is neither right nor proper nor
necessary. In this day and age, people will not tolerate this, much
less accept it.

Madam,

My Religous beliefs are not subject to what you are willing to tolarate.

I'm old enough to remember a time when people wouldn't tolarate Black
Men dating White Women, People being openly Gay, or Jews living in the
"wrong" neighborhoods. You remind me of the intolarant people from
that era.

L. Sicinius Drusus


True, your religious beliefs are not subject to what I will or will not tolerate, but I'm not talking about your religious beliefs. I am talking about the rights of animals, in case you weren't listening.

Maxima Valeria Messallina



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27514 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
LOL in your faith you might think it will happen. However, I do not believe the Messiah has come at all. The Messiah will be the one to rebuild the Temple....

http://www.jewsforjudaism.org/web/faq/general-messiah-criteria.html

Vale,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
----- Original Message -----
From: gaiusequitiuscato
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 9:04 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Sacrifice Fund


G. Equitius Cato L. Cornelio Sullae Felico M. Valeriae Messallinae
S.P.D.

Salvete.

Of course, once the Temple is rebuilt, Christ is gonna come back,
too, so there won't be a lot of time for the resumption of
sacrifices :-)

I'm glad that Vedius Germanicus posted what he did. It's much more
honest to simply say, "We're doing it because we believe the Di
Immortales demand it" than to try to sugarcoat it with claims
of "humanity". The same kinds of claims were made by the French
during the Terror regarding the guillotine, and the Nazis while
exploring more efficient ways to slaughter wholesale some certain
populations (Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, etc.) in Europe. "They
don't suffer much" can be easily slapped down with the simple fact
that they wouldn't be suffering AT ALL if you weren't killing them.

N.B. - I AM NOT EQUATING PRACTITIONERS WITH NAZIS OR THE FRENCH
DURING THE TERROR. I am equating the claims of "humanity", NOTHING
MORE.

I can, while abhorring the idea of animal sacrifices, at least
understand them from a theological point of view. Stick with that,
rather than trying to explain how "humane" it can be. As Valeria
Messalina has pointed out, the only "humane" thing to do would be
simply not kill them.

Valete.

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla"
<alexious@e...> wrote:
> Maxima, please do not insult the religious beliefs of others.
>
> Once the Temple in Jerusalem is rebuilt, animal sacrifice will
begin once again along the traditions and requirements of the Torah.
>
> Vale,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Maxima
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 8:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Sacrifice Fund
>
>
>
> AthanasiosofSpfd@a... wrote:
> Good point Drusus. Thousands of animals are killed in the
United States
> every single day, I would say probably more like tens of
thousands. With NO
> dignity, and with no respect; in very disgusting ways.
>
> I am well aware of what not tens of thousands, but millions of
animals suffer everyday in this country, for one reason or another.
>
> A Roman style sacrifice is a humane and honorable way for an
animal to be
> killed. That animal is offered to the Gods, and then part of
the animal is
> profaned for general consumption. Society has not evolved, they
have simply hidden
> their brutality and have abandoned the more civil institution of
animal
> sacrifice as a means of producting a food substance (i.e., meat)
in a most
> honorable and respectable way.
>
> This is so insane, it defies belief. Society has not evolved?
When I hear talk like this, it would certainly seem so for some of
us. And there is nothing humane nor honorable about sacrifice. If
you really believe so, why not spare the animal and sacrifice
yourself? Suddenly, it doesn't seem so honorable, does it?
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27515 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Salvete all,

This has become one of those threads where further discussion is
most likely not going to change the minds of any of the participants.

Probably best just to agree to disagree.

Valete,

G. Polillius Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27516 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
G. Equitius Cato M. Valeriae Messalinae S.P.D.

Salve, Valeria Messalina.

I want to first point out that I was among the voices that cried out
in anger and horror when the animal sacrifices question resurfaced a
few months ago. The College of Pontiffs, in a show of
reasonableness, formed the edict which currently stands: that no-one
is required to either sacrifice or not sacrfice animals, and that no
public monies would be spent regarding animal sacrifices, at least
until such time as there exists an actual Forum with a temple.

I must say, however, that upon a great deal of reflection and
conversation with many citizens, both for and against, that one
thing stands true, regardless of your position on the issue:

No one has the right to deny the practice of another citizen's
religious beliefs regardless of how barbaric or untoward we may find
them; unless of course their practices violate macronational law.


Now, I am personally in private of the religious belief that
sacrifices are absolutely unnecessary. But I believe that on a
theological basis, not from one of an animal rights activist's
standpoint.

I recognize that my privately-worshipped Deity did, in fact, demand
animal sacrifices from a certain group of people; in fact, He in
human flesh offered Himself as the one true perfect and final
Sacrifice for the world, making all other sacrifices unecessary, and
His Sacrifice is celebrated daily, bloodlessly, by millions of human
beings across the planet. That same Deity gave mankind explicit
stewardship of the earth and everything in it, living or not, to be
used for our benefit. So, while I stand firmly beside you, and
Maior, in opposition to the sacrifices of animals, I do so from a
religious standpoint.

Vale,

Cato








--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Maxima <violetphearsen@y...> wrote:
> "Do as thou wilt but harm ye none." Practice your religion to your
heart's content, but you do not have the right, and neither do I, to
harm another creator in the name of any religion. Nothing justifies
animal sacrifice because you are forgetting, or more likely,
ignoring the fact that animals have rights, too, because they, too,
are denizens of this beautiful planet and they no more want to be
sacrificed for any human's beliefs than another human would.
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27517 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
F. Galerius Aurelianus Maxima Valeria Messalina. Salve.

Domina, I wrote you a note yesterday that pointed out that animal sacrifice
for religious reasons is an integral part of active, living religions that are
accepted or, at least, tolerated by most of the world--Samaritans, Voudouns,
Santerians, Candomblists, Mogamble, the Nepalese, certain Hindus. We do not
require the rest of the world to accept Nova Roma. We merely ask that they give
us the same toleration that we would give to a Scientologist, a Raelian, an
Orthodox Jew, an Inuit Indian, or a Republican American. If you wish to
practice the Religio and not practice animal sacrifice as part of the Religio, those
of us that disagree with you will tolerate your stance. However, we ask that
you show us the same courtesy. If you cannot practice this courtesy and feel
you absolutely must vent your displeasure and disagreement on the ML, then NR
may not be the group for you. Not because you are a Vegan but because you
cannot be tolerant of others who do not agree with you. Personally, I believe
we can live with each other everyone's benefit. I will not offer you roast
pork if you will not offer me natto sushi.

F. Galerius Aurelianus,
Flamen Cerealis


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27518 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Maxima <violetphearsen@y...> wrote:

> "Do as thou wilt but harm ye none."

Madam, Quotes from Wicca have as little revalance to the Religio
Romana as quotes from the Bible or the Vedas. They are different
Religions that people are free to follow if they wish, but that has no
bearing on the Religio.

L. Sicinius Drusus
Pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27519 From: Maxima Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice
Wow. It doesn't get any more arrogant or presumptous than this and I have heard it all before. All animal activists have. I feel sorry for you that you think it beneath you to cry for your deceased pets or to see that maybe, just maybe, there's a better way to live in harmony with all animals than resorting to past practices. Most people who think like you don't really understand the natural world and deep down inside, you fear it. All humans do, until we learn to understand and appreciate all creatures, who are all sacred and equal.
And we are animals, too. On this planet, there are only two kinds of lifeforms, plant or animal. Humans are animals, too, but if we were blessed with a different type of intelligence than all other animals, maybe it wasn't so we could feel superior to them and do with them whatever we pleased. Maybe it was given to us so we could understand all that they have to offer us and share our lives with them in a way where we all live in peace with each other. It's possible, but then what am I talking about? Man can even live in peace with his brothers.

Maxima Valeria Messallina


Stefn Ullarsson <catamount_grange@...> wrote:
Valetudo quod fortuna,

I have killed and will continue to kill animals for food.
I have killed and will continue to kill animals to protect life and
property;
just as I have and would use deadly force against a human threat.

I have and will continue to stop while driving (when safe for me and
other traffic)
to avoid killing or hurting an animal unnecessarily.

I have and will continue to own pets, which I hold very dear to my heart.
I have and will continue to regard humans, who I hold very dear to my heart.

I have and will continue to report to the proper authorities those who
kill or hurt animals to no good purpose.
I have and will continue to do the same for a man, woman or child.

I am an omnivore whose diet is heavy on animal source food.
I am an omnivore who likewise kills plants for food.

I find the concept that animals have rights, inane.

I do, however, believe that I have certain responsibilities to any being
under my power and authority, whether human or lower animal.

There is a distinct difference.

My beloved cats can not frame thoughtful arguments about abstract
concepts such as rights, life, death, sacredness, etc.
At the very least; they do not communicate in intellectual terms, which
have any meaning within human concepts.

I will cry for them when they die, or I have them euthanized, like I
have other pets who have died or I have had the vet put down.

I have and will continue to believe that I have certain duties to That
Which I hold Holy.

If I should take the decision that the Holy should like to receive the
life of an animal within a sacral context, an animal will die.

A man is not a cat, is not a pig, is not a rat...

I take offense to the thought that a nonhuman's being's life is as
valuable as mine.

I refuse to believe that a human who is fully aware to the full cycle of
life can believe that my life has the same worth as my cat's.

Yes, one can take the impression that I hold "moral relativism" as
worthless.

If an ape dies to make sure I have safer medicines, so be it.
If a rat dies so that neurological science advances, so be it.
If a pig dies so that I can have bacon for breakfast, so be it.
If a cow dies so that I might give a Sacral Gift to the Holy, and
provide a sumptuous feast to kin and kith, so be it.

I for one will continue to benefit from the death of animals.

And, I shall continue to be grateful for their lives.

For if I am ungrateful and do not acknowledge the lives lost to make
mine possible, the Holy Powers will turn Their grace from me.

All life feeds on life.

In amicitia quod fides - Venator


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27520 From: Maxima Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Now, who is disrespecting the beliefs of another? In your faith, you might not think so, but to LOL about his belief is a bit disrespectful.

Maxima Valeria Messallina

"L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@...> wrote:
LOL in your faith you might think it will happen. However, I do not believe the Messiah has come at all. The Messiah will be the one to rebuild the Temple....

http://www.jewsforjudaism.org/web/faq/general-messiah-criteria.html

Vale,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
----- Original Message -----
From: gaiusequitiuscato
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 9:04 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Sacrifice Fund


G. Equitius Cato L. Cornelio Sullae Felico M. Valeriae Messallinae
S.P.D.

Salvete.

Of course, once the Temple is rebuilt, Christ is gonna come back,
too, so there won't be a lot of time for the resumption of
sacrifices :-)

I'm glad that Vedius Germanicus posted what he did. It's much more
honest to simply say, "We're doing it because we believe the Di
Immortales demand it" than to try to sugarcoat it with claims
of "humanity". The same kinds of claims were made by the French
during the Terror regarding the guillotine, and the Nazis while
exploring more efficient ways to slaughter wholesale some certain
populations (Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, etc.) in Europe. "They
don't suffer much" can be easily slapped down with the simple fact
that they wouldn't be suffering AT ALL if you weren't killing them.

N.B. - I AM NOT EQUATING PRACTITIONERS WITH NAZIS OR THE FRENCH
DURING THE TERROR. I am equating the claims of "humanity", NOTHING
MORE.

I can, while abhorring the idea of animal sacrifices, at least
understand them from a theological point of view. Stick with that,
rather than trying to explain how "humane" it can be. As Valeria
Messalina has pointed out, the only "humane" thing to do would be
simply not kill them.

Valete.

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla"
<alexious@e...> wrote:
> Maxima, please do not insult the religious beliefs of others.
>
> Once the Temple in Jerusalem is rebuilt, animal sacrifice will
begin once again along the traditions and requirements of the Torah.
>
> Vale,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Maxima
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 8:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Sacrifice Fund
>
>
>
> AthanasiosofSpfd@a... wrote:
> Good point Drusus. Thousands of animals are killed in the
United States
> every single day, I would say probably more like tens of
thousands. With NO
> dignity, and with no respect; in very disgusting ways.
>
> I am well aware of what not tens of thousands, but millions of
animals suffer everyday in this country, for one reason or another.
>
> A Roman style sacrifice is a humane and honorable way for an
animal to be
> killed. That animal is offered to the Gods, and then part of
the animal is
> profaned for general consumption. Society has not evolved, they
have simply hidden
> their brutality and have abandoned the more civil institution of
animal
> sacrifice as a means of producting a food substance (i.e., meat)
in a most
> honorable and respectable way.
>
> This is so insane, it defies belief. Society has not evolved?
When I hear talk like this, it would certainly seem so for some of
us. And there is nothing humane nor honorable about sacrifice. If
you really believe so, why not spare the animal and sacrifice
yourself? Suddenly, it doesn't seem so honorable, does it?
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27521 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
G. Equitius Cato M. Valeriae Messalinae S.P.D.

Salve, Valeria Messalina.

Thank you for the defense; but the illustrious Censor and I have a
running skirmish going on and I don't take offense, as I trust he
does not when we broach the subject. We have tangled enough times
to take each other with a grain of salt. The size of Rhode Island.

vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Maxima <violetphearsen@y...> wrote:
> Now, who is disrespecting the beliefs of another? In your faith,
you might not think so, but to LOL about his belief is a bit
disrespectful.
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
> "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@e...> wrote:
> LOL in your faith you might think it will happen. However, I do
not believe the Messiah has come at all. The Messiah will be the one
to rebuild the Temple....
>
> http://www.jewsforjudaism.org/web/faq/general-messiah-criteria.html
>
> Vale,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: gaiusequitiuscato
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 9:04 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Sacrifice Fund
>
>
> G. Equitius Cato L. Cornelio Sullae Felico M. Valeriae
Messallinae
> S.P.D.
>
> Salvete.
>
> Of course, once the Temple is rebuilt, Christ is gonna come
back,
> too, so there won't be a lot of time for the resumption of
> sacrifices :-)
>
> I'm glad that Vedius Germanicus posted what he did. It's much
more
> honest to simply say, "We're doing it because we believe the Di
> Immortales demand it" than to try to sugarcoat it with claims
> of "humanity". The same kinds of claims were made by the French
> during the Terror regarding the guillotine, and the Nazis while
> exploring more efficient ways to slaughter wholesale some
certain
> populations (Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, etc.) in Europe. "They
> don't suffer much" can be easily slapped down with the simple
fact
> that they wouldn't be suffering AT ALL if you weren't killing
them.
>
> N.B. - I AM NOT EQUATING PRACTITIONERS WITH NAZIS OR THE FRENCH
> DURING THE TERROR. I am equating the claims of "humanity",
NOTHING
> MORE.
>
> I can, while abhorring the idea of animal sacrifices, at least
> understand them from a theological point of view. Stick with
that,
> rather than trying to explain how "humane" it can be. As
Valeria
> Messalina has pointed out, the only "humane" thing to do would
be
> simply not kill them.
>
> Valete.
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla"
> <alexious@e...> wrote:
> > Maxima, please do not insult the religious beliefs of others.
> >
> > Once the Temple in Jerusalem is rebuilt, animal sacrifice will
> begin once again along the traditions and requirements of the
Torah.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Maxima
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 8:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Sacrifice Fund
> >
> >
> >
> > AthanasiosofSpfd@a... wrote:
> > Good point Drusus. Thousands of animals are killed in the
> United States
> > every single day, I would say probably more like tens of
> thousands. With NO
> > dignity, and with no respect; in very disgusting ways.
> >
> > I am well aware of what not tens of thousands, but millions
of
> animals suffer everyday in this country, for one reason or
another.
> >
> > A Roman style sacrifice is a humane and honorable way for an
> animal to be
> > killed. That animal is offered to the Gods, and then part
of
> the animal is
> > profaned for general consumption. Society has not evolved,
they
> have simply hidden
> > their brutality and have abandoned the more civil
institution of
> animal
> > sacrifice as a means of producting a food substance (i.e.,
meat)
> in a most
> > honorable and respectable way.
> >
> > This is so insane, it defies belief. Society has not
evolved?
> When I hear talk like this, it would certainly seem so for some
of
> us. And there is nothing humane nor honorable about sacrifice.
If
> you really believe so, why not spare the animal and sacrifice
> yourself? Suddenly, it doesn't seem so honorable, does it?
> >
> > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
----
> -----------
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
> >
> > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms
> of Service.
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27522 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund--Aurelianus to Maxima.
Domina, the rights of animals are defined by Man. If the Maker and Creator
of Gods, Men, and Animals has an agenda of animal rights, it has not been
communicated to me at this moment. An animal has no inherent or even inalienable
rights nor for that matter does Man, except those Man has given to other Men
and animals. Animals kill one another to live and survive. While it is
possible for Men to live without killing and eating animal flesh, is it necessarily
more moral or ethical. You believe so and I do not. The point of this
discussion in not about the rights of animals as you perceive them because this is
not the ML for PETA but the ML for Nova Roma. The point of this discussion is
that for many of those who follow the Religio, the sacrifice of an animal as
part of a sacrifice is a religious right and requirement. Faith cannot be based
on logic. As Fabiana pointed out, only one sacrifice of a living creature
has ever been conducted by a Nova Roman. He did this out of faith and his
strong spiritual commitment to Dii Immortales. His family received the gift and
blessing that came from the profaned food for the nourishment of their bodies.

There have been two other individuals that I know on this list that have
voiced their disagreement with the thought of animal sacrifice and their posts
were similar to your own. It still comes down to some of us will do it out of
faith and duty to Dii Immortales and some will object to it as cruel and not in
keeping with modern Society. We disagree. That is pretty much everything
that has and will be accomplished.

Vale.

F. Galerius Aurelianus
Flamen Cerealis


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27523 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Maxima <violetphearsen@y...> wrote:
> Wow. It doesn't get any more arrogant or presumptous than this and I
> have heard it all before.

Madame,

Your Intolarance is the height of arrogance and presumption. We don't
ask you to take part in our rituals, we don't ask that you approve of
them, all we ask is that you respect the religous beliefs of your
fellow citizens.

We aren't going to change our beliefs to suit your whims, and if you
can't accept that then you might be more at home in some less tolarant
organization.

L. Sicinius Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27524 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
I wasnt being disrespectful, the LOL was more along the lines of a chuckle in reality. Maxima, you are way too emotional for this. Perhaps you should take some time off and distance yourself. In other arguements I have been just as emotional and rash as you are at this moment.

Vale,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
----- Original Message -----
From: Maxima
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Sacrifice Fund


Now, who is disrespecting the beliefs of another? In your faith, you might not think so, but to LOL about his belief is a bit disrespectful.

Maxima Valeria Messallina

"L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@...> wrote:
LOL in your faith you might think it will happen. However, I do not believe the Messiah has come at all. The Messiah will be the one to rebuild the Temple....

http://www.jewsforjudaism.org/web/faq/general-messiah-criteria.html

Vale,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
----- Original Message -----
From: gaiusequitiuscato
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 9:04 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Sacrifice Fund


G. Equitius Cato L. Cornelio Sullae Felico M. Valeriae Messallinae
S.P.D.

Salvete.

Of course, once the Temple is rebuilt, Christ is gonna come back,
too, so there won't be a lot of time for the resumption of
sacrifices :-)

I'm glad that Vedius Germanicus posted what he did. It's much more
honest to simply say, "We're doing it because we believe the Di
Immortales demand it" than to try to sugarcoat it with claims
of "humanity". The same kinds of claims were made by the French
during the Terror regarding the guillotine, and the Nazis while
exploring more efficient ways to slaughter wholesale some certain
populations (Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, etc.) in Europe. "They
don't suffer much" can be easily slapped down with the simple fact
that they wouldn't be suffering AT ALL if you weren't killing them.

N.B. - I AM NOT EQUATING PRACTITIONERS WITH NAZIS OR THE FRENCH
DURING THE TERROR. I am equating the claims of "humanity", NOTHING
MORE.

I can, while abhorring the idea of animal sacrifices, at least
understand them from a theological point of view. Stick with that,
rather than trying to explain how "humane" it can be. As Valeria
Messalina has pointed out, the only "humane" thing to do would be
simply not kill them.

Valete.

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla"
<alexious@e...> wrote:
> Maxima, please do not insult the religious beliefs of others.
>
> Once the Temple in Jerusalem is rebuilt, animal sacrifice will
begin once again along the traditions and requirements of the Torah.
>
> Vale,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Maxima
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 8:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Sacrifice Fund
>
>
>
> AthanasiosofSpfd@a... wrote:
> Good point Drusus. Thousands of animals are killed in the
United States
> every single day, I would say probably more like tens of
thousands. With NO
> dignity, and with no respect; in very disgusting ways.
>
> I am well aware of what not tens of thousands, but millions of
animals suffer everyday in this country, for one reason or another.
>
> A Roman style sacrifice is a humane and honorable way for an
animal to be
> killed. That animal is offered to the Gods, and then part of
the animal is
> profaned for general consumption. Society has not evolved, they
have simply hidden
> their brutality and have abandoned the more civil institution of
animal
> sacrifice as a means of producting a food substance (i.e., meat)
in a most
> honorable and respectable way.
>
> This is so insane, it defies belief. Society has not evolved?
When I hear talk like this, it would certainly seem so for some of
us. And there is nothing humane nor honorable about sacrifice. If
you really believe so, why not spare the animal and sacrifice
yourself? Suddenly, it doesn't seem so honorable, does it?
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27525 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Cato, I apologize if you felt I was disrespecting your faith. My response was in good faith and that is why I cross posted it to the NR Jewish list to discuss the various concepts of the Messiah.

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: gaiusequitiuscato
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 9:42 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Sacrifice Fund


G. Equitius Cato M. Valeriae Messalinae S.P.D.

Salve, Valeria Messalina.

Thank you for the defense; but the illustrious Censor and I have a
running skirmish going on and I don't take offense, as I trust he
does not when we broach the subject. We have tangled enough times
to take each other with a grain of salt. The size of Rhode Island.

vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Maxima <violetphearsen@y...> wrote:
> Now, who is disrespecting the beliefs of another? In your faith,
you might not think so, but to LOL about his belief is a bit
disrespectful.
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
> "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@e...> wrote:
> LOL in your faith you might think it will happen. However, I do
not believe the Messiah has come at all. The Messiah will be the one
to rebuild the Temple....
>
> http://www.jewsforjudaism.org/web/faq/general-messiah-criteria.html
>
> Vale,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: gaiusequitiuscato
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 9:04 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Sacrifice Fund
>
>
> G. Equitius Cato L. Cornelio Sullae Felico M. Valeriae
Messallinae
> S.P.D.
>
> Salvete.
>
> Of course, once the Temple is rebuilt, Christ is gonna come
back,
> too, so there won't be a lot of time for the resumption of
> sacrifices :-)
>
> I'm glad that Vedius Germanicus posted what he did. It's much
more
> honest to simply say, "We're doing it because we believe the Di
> Immortales demand it" than to try to sugarcoat it with claims
> of "humanity". The same kinds of claims were made by the French
> during the Terror regarding the guillotine, and the Nazis while
> exploring more efficient ways to slaughter wholesale some
certain
> populations (Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, etc.) in Europe. "They
> don't suffer much" can be easily slapped down with the simple
fact
> that they wouldn't be suffering AT ALL if you weren't killing
them.
>
> N.B. - I AM NOT EQUATING PRACTITIONERS WITH NAZIS OR THE FRENCH
> DURING THE TERROR. I am equating the claims of "humanity",
NOTHING
> MORE.
>
> I can, while abhorring the idea of animal sacrifices, at least
> understand them from a theological point of view. Stick with
that,
> rather than trying to explain how "humane" it can be. As
Valeria
> Messalina has pointed out, the only "humane" thing to do would
be
> simply not kill them.
>
> Valete.
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla"
> <alexious@e...> wrote:
> > Maxima, please do not insult the religious beliefs of others.
> >
> > Once the Temple in Jerusalem is rebuilt, animal sacrifice will
> begin once again along the traditions and requirements of the
Torah.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Maxima
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 8:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Sacrifice Fund
> >
> >
> >
> > AthanasiosofSpfd@a... wrote:
> > Good point Drusus. Thousands of animals are killed in the
> United States
> > every single day, I would say probably more like tens of
> thousands. With NO
> > dignity, and with no respect; in very disgusting ways.
> >
> > I am well aware of what not tens of thousands, but millions
of
> animals suffer everyday in this country, for one reason or
another.
> >
> > A Roman style sacrifice is a humane and honorable way for an
> animal to be
> > killed. That animal is offered to the Gods, and then part
of
> the animal is
> > profaned for general consumption. Society has not evolved,
they
> have simply hidden
> > their brutality and have abandoned the more civil
institution of
> animal
> > sacrifice as a means of producting a food substance (i.e.,
meat)
> in a most
> > honorable and respectable way.
> >
> > This is so insane, it defies belief. Society has not
evolved?
> When I hear talk like this, it would certainly seem so for some
of
> us. And there is nothing humane nor honorable about sacrifice.
If
> you really believe so, why not spare the animal and sacrifice
> yourself? Suddenly, it doesn't seem so honorable, does it?
> >
> > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
----
> -----------
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
> >
> > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms
> of Service.
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27526 From: Gaius Ambrosius Artorus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
A reasonable proposition, indeed. I can't help but think that perhaps
a few private messages recommending tolerance for the strongly held
religious beliefs of others might have been a better response than re-
hashing old arguments.

Vale,
Ambrosius Artorus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiuspopilliuslaenas"
<ksterne@b...> wrote:
> Salvete all,
>
> This has become one of those threads where further discussion is
> most likely not going to change the minds of any of the
participants.
>
> Probably best just to agree to disagree.
>
> Valete,
>
> G. Polillius Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27527 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
Citizens,

Do we always have to take this route?

This is a disgusting practice & you are a barbarian.
You are intolerant and don't understand anything.
Your stance is the height of folly and cruelty.
Your stance is the height of intolerance and arrogance.
Animal Killer!
Goat Lover!
Bastard!
Stupid Git!
Obscene gesture!!!
Obscene gesture returned!!!

I prefer--

Maxima Messalina is entitled to her opinion and it is totally correct for her.
Sicinius Drusus is entitled to her opinion and it is totally appropriate for
him.
They don't agree.
Drusus, do not invite Maxima Messalina to the sacrifice of a red dog to
Robiligo.
Messalina, it is not a good idea to invite Drusus to the vegetarian luncheon
sponsored by Democrats for PETA.
Both of you can come to my pavilion and drink wine of Limnos & enjoy some
bread and olive oil.

F. Galerius Aurelianus
Flamen Cerealis
Proponent of peaceful disagreement on the Nova Roma ML


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27528 From: Mike Abboud Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Its my bet that given the choice to kill, skin and eviscerate an animal that the starving person would have no problem with it.

Vale;
Tiberius Arcanus Agricola
mikeabboud@...
You know as well as I that if most people had to kill, skin,
evicerate an animal for their meal they would be sick and unable to
do it.
bene vale in pace deorum
M. Arminia Maior Fabiana



> I must correct you. As an animal rights activist and a vegan, thank
you, these "events" are not "attacked," but they are investigated as
much as time and personnel will allow it. And just because you may,
or may not be, dispatching the animal a bit more carefully than those
who do in the cow or the pig does not make what you do any more
acceptable or humane. The only truly humane thing to do would be to
not do it at all.
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27529 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
Sir,

There are few things as rude as making demeaning remarks about another
person's religion, and trying to prohibit their free exercise of it.
People like Maxima Messalina are not content with voicing their
viewpoint, they wishes to enforce it by any means possible.

L. Sicinius Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@a... wrote:
> Citizens,
>
> Do we always have to take this route?
>
> This is a disgusting practice & you are a barbarian.
> You are intolerant and don't understand anything.
> Your stance is the height of folly and cruelty.
> Your stance is the height of intolerance and arrogance.
> Animal Killer!
> Goat Lover!
> Bastard!
> Stupid Git!
> Obscene gesture!!!
> Obscene gesture returned!!!
>
> I prefer--
>
> Maxima Messalina is entitled to her opinion and it is totally
correct for her.
> Sicinius Drusus is entitled to her opinion and it is totally
appropriate for
> him.
> They don't agree.
> Drusus, do not invite Maxima Messalina to the sacrifice of a red dog to
> Robiligo.
> Messalina, it is not a good idea to invite Drusus to the vegetarian
luncheon
> sponsored by Democrats for PETA.
> Both of you can come to my pavilion and drink wine of Limnos & enjoy
some
> bread and olive oil.
>
> F. Galerius Aurelianus
> Flamen Cerealis
> Proponent of peaceful disagreement on the Nova Roma ML
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27530 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
Sicinus Drusus is entitled to her opinion? LOL I just had a laugh at that one! :)

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.


Citizens,

Do we always have to take this route?

This is a disgusting practice & you are a barbarian.
You are intolerant and don't understand anything.
Your stance is the height of folly and cruelty.
Your stance is the height of intolerance and arrogance.
Animal Killer!
Goat Lover!
Bastard!
Stupid Git!
Obscene gesture!!!
Obscene gesture returned!!!

I prefer--

Maxima Messalina is entitled to her opinion and it is totally correct for her.
Sicinius Drusus is entitled to her opinion and it is totally appropriate for
him.
They don't agree.
Drusus, do not invite Maxima Messalina to the sacrifice of a red dog to
Robiligo.
Messalina, it is not a good idea to invite Drusus to the vegetarian luncheon
sponsored by Democrats for PETA.
Both of you can come to my pavilion and drink wine of Limnos & enjoy some
bread and olive oil.

F. Galerius Aurelianus
Flamen Cerealis
Proponent of peaceful disagreement on the Nova Roma ML


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27531 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Q. Caecilius Metellus Maximae Valeriae Messalinae salutem dicit

> This is so insane, it defies belief. Society has not evolved? When I hear talk like this, it would certainly seem so for some of us. And there is nothing humane nor honorable about sacrifice. If you really believe so, why not spare the animal and sacrifice yourself? Suddenly, it doesn't seem so honorable, does it?
>

Okay, it's about my time to chime in on this. First, this rings of a post Maior made which got her a moderation for 33 days. Second, I'm not to happy at the thought of other animals dying at all. But, if it is what the Gods want, you better damn well believe that I'm going to make sure that it gets done, and I'll make sure the animal dies as quickly and painlessly as possiible. Third, as for sacrificing oneself, if I find that it is what the Gods desire, then my life is Their's. It's that simple. It's not about what we mortals want, or what we think is right, just, dignified.... whatever. It's about what the Gods want. It's that simple. Get used to it.

Quintus Caecilius Metellus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27532 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
G. Equitius Cato F. Galerio AurelianoS.P.D.

salve, Galerius Aurelianus.

OK, I'm seeing a recurring oversight here. Everyone gets to poke
Cato, but then, when it comes time for the wine to get poured,
where's Cato? Nowhere to be found. Does anybody offer CATO bread
and olive oil (mmmmm...olive oil....) Nope. As usual. Fine. The
horse and I are going to get Chinese takeout and THEN you'll be
sorry. Hmph.

Vale,

Cato
Who likes Chinese food better anyways. Sort of. OK, not really,
but there's a Point To Be Made here.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@a... wrote:
> Citizens,
>
> Do we always have to take this route?
>
> This is a disgusting practice & you are a barbarian.
> You are intolerant and don't understand anything.
> Your stance is the height of folly and cruelty.
> Your stance is the height of intolerance and arrogance.
> Animal Killer!
> Goat Lover!
> Bastard!
> Stupid Git!
> Obscene gesture!!!
> Obscene gesture returned!!!
>
> I prefer--
>
> Maxima Messalina is entitled to her opinion and it is totally
correct for her.
> Sicinius Drusus is entitled to her opinion and it is totally
appropriate for
> him.
> They don't agree.
> Drusus, do not invite Maxima Messalina to the sacrifice of a red
dog to
> Robiligo.
> Messalina, it is not a good idea to invite Drusus to the
vegetarian luncheon
> sponsored by Democrats for PETA.
> Both of you can come to my pavilion and drink wine of Limnos &
enjoy some
> bread and olive oil.
>
> F. Galerius Aurelianus
> Flamen Cerealis
> Proponent of peaceful disagreement on the Nova Roma ML
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27533 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
Awwww Cato, dont feel left out....Come out to California, and I will buy you a nice Chianti!

But, dont bring your horse, I dont think the restaurant will appreciate his presence...or is it a female horse...I dont know if we even asked that before.

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: gaiusequitiuscato
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 10:45 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.


G. Equitius Cato F. Galerio AurelianoS.P.D.

salve, Galerius Aurelianus.

OK, I'm seeing a recurring oversight here. Everyone gets to poke
Cato, but then, when it comes time for the wine to get poured,
where's Cato? Nowhere to be found. Does anybody offer CATO bread
and olive oil (mmmmm...olive oil....) Nope. As usual. Fine. The
horse and I are going to get Chinese takeout and THEN you'll be
sorry. Hmph.

Vale,

Cato
Who likes Chinese food better anyways. Sort of. OK, not really,
but there's a Point To Be Made here.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@a... wrote:
> Citizens,
>
> Do we always have to take this route?
>
> This is a disgusting practice & you are a barbarian.
> You are intolerant and don't understand anything.
> Your stance is the height of folly and cruelty.
> Your stance is the height of intolerance and arrogance.
> Animal Killer!
> Goat Lover!
> Bastard!
> Stupid Git!
> Obscene gesture!!!
> Obscene gesture returned!!!
>
> I prefer--
>
> Maxima Messalina is entitled to her opinion and it is totally
correct for her.
> Sicinius Drusus is entitled to her opinion and it is totally
appropriate for
> him.
> They don't agree.
> Drusus, do not invite Maxima Messalina to the sacrifice of a red
dog to
> Robiligo.
> Messalina, it is not a good idea to invite Drusus to the
vegetarian luncheon
> sponsored by Democrats for PETA.
> Both of you can come to my pavilion and drink wine of Limnos &
enjoy some
> bread and olive oil.
>
> F. Galerius Aurelianus
> Flamen Cerealis
> Proponent of peaceful disagreement on the Nova Roma ML
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27534 From: Samantha Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Maxima,
No one is asking you to approve or take part in it. And there are
other religious organizations that do perform animal sacrafices in
this day and age. For these other folks who have been doing it for
generations. Then where is the social evolution.
You don't have to like it certainly, but it is not necessary to
belittle the beliefs of another. I do believe that the CP has alread
solved this issue.
Those who sacrafice can't make you take part, and you in turn can't
stop them from doing it. This has already been argued about before,
and I had hoped simply directing you to the archives would deflect
from another argument. Apparently that is not so.
And yes I have helped kill chickens to eat (my aunt raised them), as
well as helped clean deer before they were butchered and stored and
then gladly eaten the meat afterwards.
I really don't see the point of this arguement, since the CP made a
ruling on it that benefits both parties.

Lucia Modia Lupa


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Maxima <violetphearsen@y...> wrote:
> I was not being impolite. I was stating my shock upon learning that
some Nova Romans actually want to bring animal sacrifice back and
make it part of New Rome in today's modern world. Unbelievable.
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
>]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27535 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
<grumble grumble>

OK.

He's a boy. Nicomachus (note the corrected spelling). I call
him "Nick".

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla"
<alexious@e...> wrote:
> Awwww Cato, dont feel left out....Come out to California, and I
will buy you a nice Chianti!
>
> But, dont bring your horse, I dont think the restaurant will
appreciate his presence...or is it a female horse...I dont know if
we even asked that before.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: gaiusequitiuscato
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 10:45 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax
et Concordia.
>
>
> G. Equitius Cato F. Galerio AurelianoS.P.D.
>
> salve, Galerius Aurelianus.
>
> OK, I'm seeing a recurring oversight here. Everyone gets to
poke
> Cato, but then, when it comes time for the wine to get poured,
> where's Cato? Nowhere to be found. Does anybody offer CATO
bread
> and olive oil (mmmmm...olive oil....) Nope. As usual. Fine.
The
> horse and I are going to get Chinese takeout and THEN you'll be
> sorry. Hmph.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
> Who likes Chinese food better anyways. Sort of. OK, not
really,
> but there's a Point To Be Made here.
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@a... wrote:
> > Citizens,
> >
> > Do we always have to take this route?
> >
> > This is a disgusting practice & you are a barbarian.
> > You are intolerant and don't understand anything.
> > Your stance is the height of folly and cruelty.
> > Your stance is the height of intolerance and arrogance.
> > Animal Killer!
> > Goat Lover!
> > Bastard!
> > Stupid Git!
> > Obscene gesture!!!
> > Obscene gesture returned!!!
> >
> > I prefer--
> >
> > Maxima Messalina is entitled to her opinion and it is totally
> correct for her.
> > Sicinius Drusus is entitled to her opinion and it is totally
> appropriate for
> > him.
> > They don't agree.
> > Drusus, do not invite Maxima Messalina to the sacrifice of a
red
> dog to
> > Robiligo.
> > Messalina, it is not a good idea to invite Drusus to the
> vegetarian luncheon
> > sponsored by Democrats for PETA.
> > Both of you can come to my pavilion and drink wine of Limnos &
> enjoy some
> > bread and olive oil.
> >
> > F. Galerius Aurelianus
> > Flamen Cerealis
> > Proponent of peaceful disagreement on the Nova Roma ML
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27536 From: Samantha Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
>
> "Do as thou wilt but harm ye none." Practice your religion to your
heart's content, but you do not have the right, and neither do I, to
harm another creator in the name of any religion.

The only place I have heard that phrase is in Wicca, I am sorry to
tell you that the Religio is not Wicca.. so I don't think that using
that phrase in religious context will bring forward any particular
emotion from some practitioners.
Of course you, like many others, don't even have to take part of the
Religio either. Not that one has perform animal sacrafice in the
Religio, certainly not. As was already said it is an option. But if
you lean more towards a different faith no is going to particularly
care what faith you practice privately.

And as far as I understand, what I consider an animals rites is not
to be uselessly slaughtered (in case of fur bearing animal strictly
for their fur)... which is hardly the case here. the animals are not
killed and left to rot but are eaten like any other animal that is
killed for food. Last I checked it was perfectly legal to kill for
food. And last I checked there wasn't any sort of legalities on what
you do with the organs that most folks don't eat now-days anyway.


Lucia Modia Lupa

> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27537 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Salvete Omnes,

Let me apologize. I was rather rash in my last posting. I should know not to respond while my emotions are still roused. And as a priest whose duty it is to maintain peace and justice, I should know this even more, and should have tried more to strike peace than have responded as I did. For all this, I apologize.

That said, I rescind my last comment of my previous post ("Get used to it."). Flamen Aurelianus has it right: we are all entitled to our own opinions and beliefs, and to practice as we see fit, within certain guidelines. But none of this should be taken to mean that I am willing to compromise on my religion. I will perform what I believe will please the Gods because if the Gods are not pleased, then our welfare and survival ccomes, to me, under serious doubt. That is how I feel about things.

Valete Optime in Pace Deorum,

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27538 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Lands from taxation.
Salvete,

I couldn't read the original post without keeping something of a smile on my face. While Hortensius is sitting at his loom, I'd like to be over in the Tabularium, maintaining the Archives and the Records as each new law comes in and old ones are removed or amended, or out on the Rostra, wasting time, rambling on about nothing. Dreams, they all are. Nothing but dreams. But I would like to see them made a reality.

I think when each of us joined Nova Roma, we came with a dream. I cling to my dream; I think I do so because it's all I have. I know that many others cling to their dreams, for whatever reasons. Many times, this is the cause of a disagreements. I think the main thing is not to lose sight of our dreams.

Knowing, then, how much we disagree, not to undermine the Peace list, I wonder: How much argument, mudslinging, and verbal assault, could we avoid if we just tried to work with the Points of View of others, in how we make those dreams into realities. I think those disagreements could be minimized that way. At least, I like to hope so.

Perhaps my age makes me naive. Perhaps I'm just trying to keep up optimism. In any case, I have a dream, as do many. Why are we fighting when there are so many dreams we could be making realities?

Valete,

Quintus Caecilius Metellus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27539 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Lands from taxation.
Salve,

You want a job in the Tabularium? Are you mad? You couldn't do that
job on your own. A team of navvies would be hard pressed to carry all
the laws around. At the very least you need to borrow Cato's horse
and hook him up to a very large waggon, unless you want a hernia.

Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus"
<postumianus@g...> wrote:
> Salvete,
>
> I couldn't read the original post without keeping something of a
smile on my face. While Hortensius is sitting at his loom, I'd like
to be over in the Tabularium, maintaining the Archives and the
Records as each new law comes in and old ones are removed or amended,
or out on the Rostra, wasting time, rambling on about nothing.
Dreams, they all are. Nothing but dreams. But I would like to see
them made a reality.
>
> I think when each of us joined Nova Roma, we came with a dream. I
cling to my dream; I think I do so because it's all I have. I know
that many others cling to their dreams, for whatever reasons. Many
times, this is the cause of a disagreements. I think the main thing
is not to lose sight of our dreams.
>
> Knowing, then, how much we disagree, not to undermine the Peace
list, I wonder: How much argument, mudslinging, and verbal assault,
could we avoid if we just tried to work with the Points of View of
others, in how we make those dreams into realities. I think those
disagreements could be minimized that way. At least, I like to hope
so.
>
> Perhaps my age makes me naive. Perhaps I'm just trying to keep up
optimism. In any case, I have a dream, as do many. Why are we
fighting when there are so many dreams we could be making realities?
>
> Valete,
>
> Quintus Caecilius Metellus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27540 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Gaius Modius Athanasius Maximae Valeriae Messallinae salutem dicit

I admire your courage and fortitude, you truly believe in your cause and for
that you have my admiration. I do understand how you feel. Last year I took
an six month fast from all all meat, and became a vegitarian (although not a
vegan, but I do drink soy milk over cow's milk and I only eat eggs from time to
time) for half the year. I fast from meat several times a week, all to honor
Pomona; the Goddess I am dedicated to.

Out of respect for your convictions I personally have no desire to debate
with you the issue of sacrifice. I do not believe Pomona requires me to offer
animal sacrifice. I believe she is pleased with the wine, incense, and apples
that I offer to Her. If for some reason I believe she demands otherwise then I
will seek to do what it takes to please her and do my part to maintain the
Pax Deorum, but for now the wine, incense, and apples shall be sufficient.

You have strong beliefs, and for that you have my respect even though we do
not share a mutual belief. I commend you in your efforts to help bring an end
to suffering, and to do some compassionate work.

Valete;

Gaius Modius Athanasius
Flamen Pomonalis

In a message dated 8/13/2004 12:07:50 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
violetphearsen@... writes:
This is so insane, it defies belief. Society has not evolved? When I hear
talk like this, it would certainly seem so for some of us. And there is nothing
humane nor honorable about sacrifice. If you really believe so, why not spare
the animal and sacrifice yourself? Suddenly, it doesn't seem so honorable, does
it?

Maxima Valeria Messallina


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27541 From: Samantha Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Salve,
Every now and again I fast from meat as well. The first part of
August. To tell the truth though, this is the first time I have gone
this long fasting from meat, and even hamburger (which I don'tlike)
is starting to look appealing.
The festival of Nemoralia marks the end of the fasting period, there
are no sacrafices performed, no meat consumed.
There will be no meat offerings to Diana, just bread, wine, fruit and
flowers.

I think that at times fasting periods from meat are good.

Lucia Modia Lupa

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, AthanasiosofSpfd@a... wrote:
Last year I took
> an six month fast from all all meat, and became a vegitarian
(although not a
> vegan, but I do drink soy milk over cow's milk and I only eat eggs
from time to
> time) for half the year. I fast from meat several times a week,
all to honor
> Pomona; the Goddess I am dedicated to.
>
> Out of respect for your convictions I personally have no desire to
debate
> with you the issue of sacrifice. I do not believe Pomona requires
me to offer
> animal sacrifice. I believe she is pleased with the wine, incense,
and apples
> that I offer to Her. If for some reason I believe she demands
otherwise then I
> will seek to do what it takes to please her and do my part to
maintain the
> Pax Deorum, but for now the wine, incense, and apples shall be
sufficient.
>
> You have strong beliefs, and for that you have my respect even
though we do
> not share a mutual belief. I commend you in your efforts to help
bring an end
> to suffering, and to do some compassionate work.
>
> Valete;
>
> Gaius Modius Athanasius
> Flamen Pomonalis
message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27542 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Again the Pactum de convento Novae Romae in Europa
Salvete Quirites!

I have been waiting for Curule Aedile Marcus Julius Perusianus and
his Scriba Manius Constantinus Serapio to return from different trips
before I told the last part of the "Pactum story". Now both of them
are back and I can add a last detail to the story. Rogator Aulus
Apollonius Cordus and the former Propraetor of Germania Marcus
Marcius Rex already has shown that the Pactum is legal and that such
things has been done before (the Limes project).

But if I just add one more thing I think everything will be clear as
crystall. The Pactum was sent to me by the staff of Curule Aedile
Marcus Julius Perusianus and it was discussed shortly among the staff
and the European Governors. I got the impression that Curule Aedile
Gaius Iulius Scaurus also was informed and positive. The _invitation_
to sign the Pactum (agreement) was sent to me as an attachment (Word)
to an email. I just wrote the edictum and then I published it and
added the Pactum at its end. All this was what the Pactum required,
but if I had forseen the coming reaction (which partly was not
constructive at all) I would have added the text from the e-mail as
then no one could have thought that I did anything wrong.

So here is the invitation to end this story:

At 17.07 -0700 04-06-30, mcserapio wrote:
>AVETE PROPRAETORES EVROPAEI
>
>Now every European Provincia has again a Propraetor.
>Therefore the Cohors of Aedilis Curulis Marcus Iulius
>Perusianus submits to you (that is the second time for
>some of you) the "Pactum de Convento Novae Romae" (see
>attached file).
>We hope in this way to strengthen the Nova Roma Rally
>in Europe.
>We welcome any question concerning this text.
>
>Let me know if you agree to undersign this Pactum.
>
>Thank you very much!
>
>OPTIME VALETE
>Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
>pro Aedilis Marcus Iulius Perusianus

The Pactum will now be approved in the Senate, at least I hope so,
and this strange discussion will be over. The Pactum itself however
will probably ensure that we will have one well organised live Rally
in Europe, supported by all European Provinciae, each year. As before
all citizens of Nova Roma both in Europe, Asia, Australia, Afrika,
North and South America will be invited as this is an All-Nova Roman
Rally but located in in Europe. As during its beginning the Curule
Aedile will be important to the execution of the Rally.
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27543 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Again the Pactum de convento Novae Romae in Europa
Salvete omnes

I would like to add that Hispania Provincia have signed the Pactum
and that I'm just looking for a citizen in Hispania to join the
Collegium Interprovinciale. In about two weeks or earlier I'll post
the Edictum telling such thing.

I do believe that this kind of intiatives makes Nova Roma a being
alive, not only a cyberspace bulk in which we don't know each other.
I hope it will help citizens around the world to know each other and
enjoy their romanitas, which should be our aim.


vale bene in pace deorum,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
PROPRAETOR·HISPANIAE


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
<christer.edling@t...> wrote:
> Salvete Quirites!
>
> I have been waiting for Curule Aedile Marcus Julius Perusianus and
> his Scriba Manius Constantinus Serapio to return from different
trips
> before I told the last part of the "Pactum story". Now both of
them
> are back and I can add a last detail to the story. Rogator Aulus
> Apollonius Cordus and the former Propraetor of Germania Marcus
> Marcius Rex already has shown that the Pactum is legal and that
such
> things has been done before (the Limes project).
>
> But if I just add one more thing I think everything will be clear
as
> crystall. The Pactum was sent to me by the staff of Curule Aedile
> Marcus Julius Perusianus and it was discussed shortly among the
staff
> and the European Governors. I got the impression that Curule
Aedile
> Gaius Iulius Scaurus also was informed and positive. The
_invitation_
> to sign the Pactum (agreement) was sent to me as an attachment
(Word)
> to an email. I just wrote the edictum and then I published it and
> added the Pactum at its end. All this was what the Pactum
required,
> but if I had forseen the coming reaction (which partly was not
> constructive at all) I would have added the text from the e-mail
as
> then no one could have thought that I did anything wrong.
>
> So here is the invitation to end this story:
>
> At 17.07 -0700 04-06-30, mcserapio wrote:
> >AVETE PROPRAETORES EVROPAEI
> >
> >Now every European Provincia has again a Propraetor.
> >Therefore the Cohors of Aedilis Curulis Marcus Iulius
> >Perusianus submits to you (that is the second time for
> >some of you) the "Pactum de Convento Novae Romae" (see
> >attached file).
> >We hope in this way to strengthen the Nova Roma Rally
> >in Europe.
> >We welcome any question concerning this text.
> >
> >Let me know if you agree to undersign this Pactum.
> >
> >Thank you very much!
> >
> >OPTIME VALETE
> >Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
> >pro Aedilis Marcus Iulius Perusianus
>
> The Pactum will now be approved in the Senate, at least I hope so,
> and this strange discussion will be over. The Pactum itself
however
> will probably ensure that we will have one well organised live
Rally
> in Europe, supported by all European Provinciae, each year. As
before
> all citizens of Nova Roma both in Europe, Asia, Australia, Afrika,
> North and South America will be invited as this is an All-Nova
Roman
> Rally but located in in Europe. As during its beginning the Curule
> Aedile will be important to the execution of the Rally.
> --
>
> Vale
>
> Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
> Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
> Proconsul Thules
> Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
> Civis Romanus sum
> ************************************************
> Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
> "I'll either find a way or make one"
> ************************************************
> Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
> Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27544 From: Greg Rose Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
G. Iulius Scaurus Q. Caecilio Metelluo Postumiano salutem dicit.

Salve, Postumiane.

I must disagree with you and Aurelianus. What Maxima Valeria Messallina
did in her attacks on animal sacrifice was a direct attack on the
Religio Publica Romana which constituted impietas prudens dolo malo. It
is the _law_ that animal sacrifice is permitted in the Religio Publica
and any person who attacks it or interferes with it in any way is in
violation of the Decretum on Animal Sacrifice, just as anyone who
attempted to compel a citizen to participate personally in a sacrifice
would be in violation of that decretum. To "agree to disagree" when one
party denounces a permitted practice of the Religio Publica as
unacceptable and barbaric is to abandon the responsibility of a sacerdos
to defend the Religio Publica. A person who tries to impose Wiccan
religious beliefs on an aspect of state policy constitutionally reserved
to the Collegium Pontificum is no different than someone who attempted
to cast down the Di Immortales for the Christian or Muslim God. The
Decretum is legally binding and a citien who will not respect its
provisions is in violation of the law. I refuse to tolerate public
disrespect to the law of Nova Roma. If any person should attempt to
disrupt a sacrifice of the Religio Publica, that person should be
immediately declared sacer and proceedings to revoke citizenship
immediately institutted. The state religion will not be profaned.

On two somewhat related matters I should like to comment. First, those
wo think that Numa was a Pythagorean are simply wrong. Numa died before
Pythagoras was born, or we must either jettison the Roman kings list or
the entire chronology of classical Greece. The idea that Numa was a
Pythagorean dates to the late first century BCE among some philosophical
thinkers, but there is no hisotircal evidence whatsoever that it was
so. Plutarch's assertion is contradicted by evidence of animal
sacrifices ordered by Numa and reported in Plutarch's own text (books
have been written on the mass of contradictions in Plutarch). Second,
there have been five animal sacrifices in the Religio Publica of Nova
Roma which I have conducted; I do not know if others have been offered
as well.

Vale.

Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27545 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: And there was a roman dinner...
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
<dom.con.fus@f...> wrote:
> Ave
>
> Speaking of gatherings and get together, yesterday evening the
Oppidum of the
> Urbs gathered at 9.30 pm at the Tiberine Island to enjoy an
ancient roman
> dinner having as a background scenery the rests of the Sulplicius
bridge.
>
> Of the 8 Cives of the Oppidum, 5 were present including both
Aediles Flavius
> Quirinus Albanus (The re-enactor of the group) and Domitius
Constantinus
> Fuscus, the Aedilis Plebis Marcus Iulius Perusianus and his wife,
Aurelia Iulia
> Pulcra, and the new member Marcus Quirinus Sulla. Also present
various partners
> and friends of the above mentioned cives, for a total of 8 people
covering 4
> different decades of ages, which I consider a great thing per se.,
including
> married and unmarried people, both genders in a reasonable ratio (3
to 5),
> patricians and plebeians, international and local magistrates and
with an
> international touch and accent given by Fuscus' German girlfriend.
>
> As the modernists were (truly, unhappily, as the modernists are
generally much
> less modernists than they are painted) welcomed by the lack of
triclinii, the
> Religio practioners, if any had been present, would had been happy
that the
> dinner was started with the invocatio bacchi held by the host of
the evening,
> Professor Nicastro, former manager, but still historical
recostructionist cook
> of the famed and sadly short lived reconstructunist restaurant
Magna Roma (The
> Sodalitas Coq & Coq might like to try to get him to join their
listÂ…)..
>
> The Mulsum (wine and honey) used for the invocatio was (relatively)
soon
> followed by:
> - a gustaticium composed by various dried fruits , but started, as
tradition,
> with a boiled egg
> - three different kind of buns following two recipes from Cato and
one taken by
> a poem by Virgilius
> - a green dense soup of peas and farrum
> - a lagana with vegetables (a kind of lasagna)
> - sampling of calf's feet
> - a kind of mashed bread with cheese and an unrecognized vegetable
> - melon in garum and honey sauce
> - chicken in honey
> - lamb at the partian way
> - carrots in garum sauce
> - strawberries in garum and pepper
> - an unidentified cake made with vegetables
> - ribes with honey
>
> The whole thing with modern wine, as the good old roman wine is
nowhere to be
> found, eaten with the help of a Coclea (except the lamb that was
eaten the
> roman way, using the hands) and with prof. Nicastro, perfect host
of the
> evening, explaining to the ones who were at their first experience
the origins
> of the various recipes and the classical text in which they were
referred at.
>
> Not to give the impression that the cives urbis were there just to
enjoy the
> dinner (which indeed was the case, but we like to pretend we were
there for
> serious stuff as well), discussions flowered along the round table
embellished
> by a precious bronze copy of the statue of the "old satyr" (the
original being
> in the Capitoline museums) about Nova Roma in general and Roman
topographical
> history, the idea of organizing one or two international meetings
in Rome next
> year and the details of the guided tours to the less touristically
known
> monuments we'll start organizing in Septemebr, the possible
participation of
> the cives to a roman re-enactment week-end organized in North Italy
and similar
> things.
>
> Eventually, more than 3 hours after they had first sat down at the
table, the
> cives, partners, friends trotted, happily and definitely heavier
than they had
> came, back home. As Marcus Quirinus Sulla was so kind to bring his
camera with
> him we *might* have pictures of the event that we *might* publish,
if anyone is
> curious about it.
>
> Note to self and to the colleague Aedilis: never organizing such a
thing when
> the day after it's a normal working dayÂ… argh.
>
> valete
>
> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
> PF Constantinia
> Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27546 From: Agrippina Modia Aurelia Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
Salve Cato,

Don't feel bad. If you're ever in Cincinnati you are more than
welcome to come to my villa for bread, olive oil & wine. After all,
evil people have to stick together (at least until we can eliminate
the competition) :)

Vale,

Agrippina


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
<mlcinnyc@y...> wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato F. Galerio AurelianoS.P.D.
>
> salve, Galerius Aurelianus.
>
> OK, I'm seeing a recurring oversight here. Everyone gets to poke
> Cato, but then, when it comes time for the wine to get poured,
> where's Cato? Nowhere to be found. Does anybody offer CATO bread
> and olive oil (mmmmm...olive oil....) Nope. As usual. Fine. The
> horse and I are going to get Chinese takeout and THEN you'll be
> sorry. Hmph.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
> Who likes Chinese food better anyways. Sort of. OK, not really,
> but there's a Point To Be Made here.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27547 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Salve Maxima;
as you see this post from the Religio Romana List is from Thursday
July 31, 2003. Now according
to Scaurus it is an offense to speak against animal sacrifice...I do
not see this as a positive way forward.
I was a sacerdos Magnae
Matris but thrown out for my pro-vegetable, wine sacrifice views.
Others with the same view are not admitted as well, the Pontifex
Maximus is against animal sacrifice as well.
The Religio should have flamens,sacerdotes and pontifeces
expressing both views.
bene vale in amore deorum
M. Arminia Maior Fabiana




In ReligioRomana@yahoogroups.com, "Antonio Grilo"
<antonio.grilo@i...> wrote:
Salve Druse

So, in your opinion King Numa, the main founder of the Religio Romana,
committed an impiety when he forbade blood sacrifice.
Personally I think that those who reject blood sacrifice within the
Religio
Romana may validly base their claims on the tradition of Numa. For
references about the tradition for banishment of blood sacrifice in
the time
of Numa see:
(Cicero, Republica 2.28, Tusculum 4.3; Livy 1.18, 40.29.9-14;
Dionysius of
Halicarnassus 2.59; Plutarch, Numa 18; Ovid, Metamorphoses 15.4.481,
Fasti
3.153; Pliny, Natural History XIII.87).

Vale bene
Graecus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27548 From: Marcus Quirinus Sulla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: cena tiberina
cena tiberina
Marcus Quirinus Sulla
http://it.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/giannidedom/album?.dir=/c8a0&.src=ph&.tok=phFb3kBBnkuoPyvv




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27549 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> > Salve Maxima Valeria;
> as another vegan, I must tell you this tiresome argument never
ends,
> but so far there is only one active sacrificing civis in NR & leave
> it at that...But for our own edification there is Pythagoras, Numa,
> and Apollonius of Tyana.
> You know as well as I that if most people had to kill, skin,
> evicerate an animal for their meal they would be sick and unable to
> do it.

Possibly the first time yes but they would get over it if they had to
with a little time. Their adverse reaction wouldn't be because the
act itself is wrong, the issue would be them. As moderns they have
deevolved and are too far removed from life--and the entire the cycle
of life and death is foreign to them.

Vale,

Palladius]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27550 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
C. Minucius Hadrianus Felix M. Arminiae Maior Fabinae S.P.D.

> Salve Maxima;
> as you see this post from the Religio Romana List is from Thursday
>July 31, 2003. Now according
>to Scaurus it is an offense to speak against animal sacrifice...I do
>not see this as a positive way forward.
> I was a sacerdos Magnae
>Matris but thrown out for my pro-vegetable, wine sacrifice views.
>
>
No. You were not thrown out for that reason. If that was the case, why
wouldn't we have "thrown" out the two Pontificies who happen to
/personally/ disagree with animal sacrifice i.e. the PM Marcus Julianus
Cassius and Pontifex Antonius Gryllus Graecus?

While I am loath to revisit an old argument, I feel I must set the
record straight. You were removed from office becuase you refused to
accept the authority of the Collegium Pontificum over the State Religio
of Nova Roma as stated in the Constitution. You have every right to hold
your own personal religious beleifs as a private citizen of Nova Roma,
but as a Sacerdos you were required to accept the authority of the
Collegium in matters relating to the State cult. The Collegium
Pontificum's Decreta on Animal Sacrifice does *NOT* compell any citizen
or priest of Nova Roma to conduct or participate in animal sacrifice.
You still chose to speak out against the CP, it's policies and decisions
in your role as a sacerdos, and like any "employer" who had an employee
making public statments against them would, we fired you. Don't confuse
the issues please.

> Others with the same view are not admitted as well, the Pontifex
>Maximus is against animal sacrifice as well.
> The Religio should have flamens,sacerdotes and pontifeces
>expressing both views.
> bene vale in amore deorum
> M. Arminia Maior Fabiana
>
>
It does actually. The PM and Pontifex Antonius Gryllus Graecus for
example. I don't perform animal sacrifice, and neither do I intend to
start (for several reasons). I do however, recognize the *right* of
others to do so, and I am glad there are those members of the priesthood
who have training and the means to appease the Gods in the traditional
manner as I cannot.

Vale bene,

C. Minucius Hadrianus Felix
Pontifex et Minervae Aedis Sacerdos
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27551 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Salve;
I had no idea that the Collegium Pontificum was my 'employer' I
thought I served the goddess.
But in any event I believe that public discussion even dissension
is healthy, why shouldn't there be a variety of points of view in
the Collegium Pontificium?
vale
M. Arminia Maior Fabiana


of Nova Roma to conduct or participate in animal sacrifice.
> You still chose to speak out against the CP, it's policies and
decisions
> in your role as a sacerdos, and like any "employer" who had an
employee
> making public statments against them would, we fired you. Don't
confuse
> the issues please.
>
> > Others with the same view are not admitted as well, the Pontifex
> >Maximus is against animal sacrifice as well.
> > The Religio should have flamens,sacerdotes and pontifeces
> >expressing both views.
> > bene vale in amore deorum
> > M. Arminia Maior Fabiana
> >
> >
> > Pontifex et Minervae Aedis Sacerdos
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27552 From: Maxima Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
"L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@...> wrote:
Animals do not hold any rights. If they did....and one kills another....does that mean the animal that killed goes to jail?

There is logic missing from your arguement, Maxima, and that is probably because you are to emotionally involved. Please take a step back and reflect a bit. Because, animals have no rights.

Vale,

Sulla

Oh, but they do. You may wish they didn't. That would make it so much easier to perform animal sacrifices. But this is not ancient Rome. This is the USA and in this country, animals have rights and are protected by laws.

I don't mean to insult anyone's beliefs. Believe whatever you want but you have not the right to impose your beliefs on another. Of course, you wouldn't try that with another person because they can speak up and defend themselves. Animals cannot, but that does not mean they are without their defenders. It is you who should reflect on what I am saying. I am just pointing out a fact: in this country, animals have rights and they have their defenders. That's all.

Maxima Valeria Messallina



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27553 From: Maxima Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
gaiuspopilliuslaenas <ksterne@...> wrote:
Salvete all,

This has become one of those threads where further discussion is
most likely not going to change the minds of any of the participants.

Probably best just to agree to disagree.

Valete,

G. Polillius Laenas


Wise words. I agree with you on that. To that end, I shall refrain from further comment.

Maxima Valeria Messallina



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27554 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
Animals are protected by law but that does not mean they have rights. There is a big difference there. I am aware that animals have their defenders as well. But what is next, Plant rights? Tree rights? Dirt rights? They all fit in your little paradigm about not being able to speak up and defend themselves.

Vale,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
----- Original Message -----
From: Maxima
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Sacrifice Fund



"L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@...> wrote:
Animals do not hold any rights. If they did....and one kills another....does that mean the animal that killed goes to jail?

There is logic missing from your arguement, Maxima, and that is probably because you are to emotionally involved. Please take a step back and reflect a bit. Because, animals have no rights.

Vale,

Sulla

Oh, but they do. You may wish they didn't. That would make it so much easier to perform animal sacrifices. But this is not ancient Rome. This is the USA and in this country, animals have rights and are protected by laws.

I don't mean to insult anyone's beliefs. Believe whatever you want but you have not the right to impose your beliefs on another. Of course, you wouldn't try that with another person because they can speak up and defend themselves. Animals cannot, but that does not mean they are without their defenders. It is you who should reflect on what I am saying. I am just pointing out a fact: in this country, animals have rights and they have their defenders. That's all.

Maxima Valeria Messallina



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27555 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
C. Minucius Hadrianus Felix M. Arminiae Maior Fabinae S.P.D.

Salve.

Maior wrote:

>Salve;
> I had no idea that the Collegium Pontificum was my 'employer' I
>thought I served the goddess.
>
>
As a member of the Nova Roman priesthood you served the Goddess through
the Nova Roman State religion, which happens to be under the control of
the Collegium Pontificum. You were appointed by the authority Collegium,
so in essence you worked for the Collegium. By the same authority that
appointed you, the Collegium had the authority (and right) to remove
you. We are not saying you do not (or cannot) serve Magna Mater. We are
saying you cannot serve Her as a representative of the Nova Roman State
Religio, since your understanding of Her and your responsibilites to Her
are at too much a variance with that of the *majority* of the Collegium
Pontificum.

> But in any event I believe that public discussion even dissension
>is healthy, why shouldn't there be a variety of points of view in
>the Collegium Pontificium?
>
>
As I stated before (in case you skipped that part) there are a variety
of points of view in the Collegium Pontificum. We have discussions on
the CP list all the time, some times quite heated. There is also a
NRPriesthood list where the other priest/esses of NR can discuss issues
with the CP and each other. We in the CP do not always agree on every
issue, which is why we make decisions based on the principle of a
majority vote. There is however an expectation when an organization uses
such a system, that once a decision is reached, it will be (publically
at least) respected by all of its members regardless of how they voted.
As a sacerdos your *public* views were subordinate to the will of the
CP. Your private views, are of course, your own perogative. If you did
not agree with the policies of the CP or the State Religio of NR, you
had every right not to represent them as a *official* priestess of the
State Religio by stepping down for your position.

> vale
> M. Arminia Maior Fabiana
>
>
>
Vale bene,

C. Minucius Hadrianus Felix
Pontifex et Minervae Aedis Sacerdos
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27556 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Salve Hadriane;
perhaps a more happy solution for this endless and intractable
issue that makes all followers of the Religio miserable

Would be to have the Collegium Pontificum evenly divided between
followers of let us call it the "Numidian" rite and those who follow
the path of Animal sacrifice.
Then there would be sacerdotes and flamens supervised by like-
minded pontifeces and all of us would be represented.
Also the Collegium could discuss issues publicly so the cives and
followers could be informed and understand what is going on.
It is a real problem with the growth of the Religio and I for one
think this might prove a very happy solution.
bene vale in pace deorum
Marca Arminia Maior Fabiana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27557 From: GAIVS IVLIANVS Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: BONA NEMORALIA!
Salvete Qvirites et omnes! Per la NEMORALIA buon
auguri! Best wishes to everyone on this Ides of August
for the Nemoralia! SALVE DIANA! Valete! Frater GAIVS
IVLIVS IVLIANVS, Flamen Floralis, PGI.




__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27558 From: k.a.wright Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Maior" <rory12001@...>
]



> perhaps a more happy solution for this endless and intractable
> issue that makes all followers of the Religio miserable
>
> Would be to have the Collegium Pontificum evenly divided between
> followers of let us call it the "Numidian" rite and those who follow
> the path of Animal sacrifice.
> Then there would be sacerdotes and flamens supervised by like-
> minded pontifeces and all of us would be represented.

But I, for one, have absolutely no wish to be represented by anyone who, in
essence, is trying to force their will on the Gods instead of complying with
the God's will for us.

Flavia Lucilla Merula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27559 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Lands from taxation.
> You want a job in the Tabularium? Are you mad? You couldn't do that
> job on your own. A team of navvies would be hard pressed to carry all
> the laws around. At the very least you need to borrow Cato's horse
> and hook him up to a very large waggon, unless you want a hernia.

Yes, as a matter of fact, I am mad. Just surf through the election results, leges, edicta, and Senatus consulta, and see how many times you find, in grey, the letters "ppnds", "spt", or "qcmp." Just more ways to get my name out there.

Vale,

Metellus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27560 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
No

For the same reason that serious institutions concerned with Geology,
Biology, and Cosmology don't set half of their postions aside for
proponants of Creationism, though I will give the creationists this
much, at least they have more to back up their claims than you do.

L. Sicinius Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> Salve Hadriane;
> perhaps a more happy solution for this endless and intractable
> issue that makes all followers of the Religio miserable
>
> Would be to have the Collegium Pontificum evenly divided between
> followers of let us call it the "Numidian" rite and those who follow
> the path of Animal sacrifice.
> Then there would be sacerdotes and flamens supervised by like-
> minded pontifeces and all of us would be represented.
> Also the Collegium could discuss issues publicly so the cives and
> followers could be informed and understand what is going on.
> It is a real problem with the growth of the Religio and I for one
> think this might prove a very happy solution.
> bene vale in pace deorum
> Marca Arminia Maior Fabiana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27561 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Is this like, NASA setting aside half of their offices for proponets of UFO life? This sounds silly. I can just see NASA doing this and then they would have absolutely no credibility left!

Vale,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
----- Original Message -----
From: John Dobbins
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 11:20 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]


No

For the same reason that serious institutions concerned with Geology,
Biology, and Cosmology don't set half of their postions aside for
proponants of Creationism, though I will give the creationists this
much, at least they have more to back up their claims than you do.

L. Sicinius Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> Salve Hadriane;
> perhaps a more happy solution for this endless and intractable
> issue that makes all followers of the Religio miserable
>
> Would be to have the Collegium Pontificum evenly divided between
> followers of let us call it the "Numidian" rite and those who follow
> the path of Animal sacrifice.
> Then there would be sacerdotes and flamens supervised by like-
> minded pontifeces and all of us would be represented.
> Also the Collegium could discuss issues publicly so the cives and
> followers could be informed and understand what is going on.
> It is a real problem with the growth of the Religio and I for one
> think this might prove a very happy solution.
> bene vale in pace deorum
> Marca Arminia Maior Fabiana


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27562 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Salvete;
Sulla since you say you have only read one book on the Religio I do
not see your words below as informative or helpful.I do not see how
Drusus's words provide any information either.

I suggest you and others read Pontifex Gryllus's references to King
Numa the founder of the Religio who forbade blood sacrifice.
Cicero, Republica 2.28, Tusuculum 4.3; Livy 1.18. 40.29-14;
Dionysius of Halcarnassus 2.59; Plutarch, Numa 18; Ovid,
Metamorphoses 15.4.481, Fasti 3.153; Pliny, Natural History XIII.87

Also why are you laughing at ideas to expose cives to understanding
of the Religio, through the Collegium having open discussion?
bene valete
M. Arminia Maior Fabiana

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@e...>
wrote:
> Is this like, NASA setting aside half of their offices for
proponets of UFO life? This sounds silly. I can just see NASA doing
this and then they would have absolutely no credibility left!
>
> Vale,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> ----- Original Message -----
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27563 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:

> I suggest you and others read Pontifex Gryllus's references to King
> Numa the founder of the Religio who forbade blood sacrifice.
> Cicero, Republica 2.28, Tusuculum 4.3; Livy 1.18. 40.29-14;
> Dionysius of Halcarnassus 2.59; Plutarch, Numa 18; Ovid,
> Metamorphoses 15.4.481, Fasti 3.153; Pliny, Natural History XIII.87

Like the Creationists you are grasping at a handfull of straws that
support your postion while ignoring everything that contradicts it.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27564 From: Jason Nickerson Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Lands from taxation.
Yes, Optimism is a good thing. ( quote from Martha.). However I think it's more of a reality than most think. Proper delegation, and passion for what NR stands for is all that's needed. With the right people in the right committees seeking out the right connections, There could be a structure erected in a few years. A year before I left Arkansas, some friends of mine in a small Buddhist community were talking about raising a temple. I thought that was a dream. They had the lands. Today, they already have one building completed. All they needed to do was find the people willing to fund there venture. The funding came from a practitioner in the U.S. Their community has double in size in the last 5 years. Their strength came from single-minded passion for what they were doing. To many people today have the do it for me attitude. That is a result of our society. We expect things to be done for us. But somebody has to make a decision. Just as there are people with musical ability, there
are those with a talent for fund raising. Maybe there is someone within NR that has festival management experience. That's a start. It all depends on what Nova Romans want. Whether they want to work toward an obtainable goal, or use NR as a venue to satisfy their ego, and argue with others. Nova Roma already owns 10 acres in TX. Coming from New Orleans, 10 acres to me, is a lot. When I moved to Arkansas, i learned different. However it is more than enough to put on a yearly festival, generate revenue, and begin to establish permanent structures. Although, I'm not sure that area of TX is sufficient to sustain a community. Without a reservoir, it's just sand. Anyway, I digress. My point is, We have passion. We've seen that in the arguments posted in this group. However whether that passion has focus or not is the question. What direction do we take? Do we want to generate funds toward the actualization of what Nova Roma stands for. The preservation of Ancient Roman Virtues, Culture,
and Society.

"Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus" <postumianus@...> wrote:Salvete,

I couldn't read the original post without keeping something of a smile on my face. While Hortensius is sitting at his loom, I'd like to be over in the Tabularium, maintaining the Archives and the Records as each new law comes in and old ones are removed or amended, or out on the Rostra, wasting time, rambling on about nothing. Dreams, they all are. Nothing but dreams. But I would like to see them made a reality.

I think when each of us joined Nova Roma, we came with a dream. I cling to my dream; I think I do so because it's all I have. I know that many others cling to their dreams, for whatever reasons. Many times, this is the cause of a disagreements. I think the main thing is not to lose sight of our dreams.

Knowing, then, how much we disagree, not to undermine the Peace list, I wonder: How much argument, mudslinging, and verbal assault, could we avoid if we just tried to work with the Points of View of others, in how we make those dreams into realities. I think those disagreements could be minimized that way. At least, I like to hope so.

Perhaps my age makes me naive. Perhaps I'm just trying to keep up optimism. In any case, I have a dream, as do many. Why are we fighting when there are so many dreams we could be making realities?

Valete,

Quintus Caecilius Metellus

Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27565 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Lands from taxation.
Salvete:
nothing is stopping you this minute from organizing a U.S, and
Australian etc...Conventus..have the will the desire..I have 3 active
cives and we almost had enough to host the european rally.
The PM has a very successful meeting in Maine so..go on.
valete
M. Arminia Maior Fabiana

Propraetrix Hiberniae
scriba Iuris et
Investigatio CFQ
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27566 From: Kaelus Iulius Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
Yes, I second that. Anytime you're in Cincinnati, inform one of us
and we'll call a regional meeting. We could even find a horse-
friendly restaurant, Cato.

This also applies to any cive who happens to be in the SW Ohio area.
Just let me, Aggrippina, Metellus Postumianius, or Athanasius know. I
meant, the meeting and dinner part. Not the horse part. Umm... yeah.


-Kaelus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Agrippina Modia Aurelia"
<whiterose13.geo@y...> wrote:
> Salve Cato,
>
> Don't feel bad. If you're ever in Cincinnati you are more than
> welcome to come to my villa for bread, olive oil & wine. After
all,
> evil people have to stick together (at least until we can eliminate
> the competition) :)
>
> Vale,
>
> Agrippina
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
> <mlcinnyc@y...> wrote:
> > G. Equitius Cato F. Galerio AurelianoS.P.D.
> >
> > salve, Galerius Aurelianus.
> >
> > OK, I'm seeing a recurring oversight here. Everyone gets to poke
> > Cato, but then, when it comes time for the wine to get poured,
> > where's Cato? Nowhere to be found. Does anybody offer CATO
bread
> > and olive oil (mmmmm...olive oil....) Nope. As usual. Fine.
The
> > horse and I are going to get Chinese takeout and THEN you'll be
> > sorry. Hmph.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> > Who likes Chinese food better anyways. Sort of. OK, not really,
> > but there's a Point To Be Made here.
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27567 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Salvete omnes,

At the risk of entering a religious discussion with my philosophical
point of view, I'm going to offer some thoughts here...

Maior wrote:

> I suggest you and others read Pontifex Gryllus's references to King
> Numa the founder of the Religio who forbade blood sacrifice.

My whole problem with this is that historical research has shown that
King Numa didn't do that. Just earlier today Scaurus again explained
why the idea that Numa was Pythagorean was incorrect. Just because Livy
propogated it doesn't give it any special status. Claudius Ptolemy
wrote a lot of stuff that was accepted as true for 1500 years until
Johannes Kepler proved him wrong. I don't see anyone suggesting that
Nova Roma reintroduce the Ptolemaic model of the solar system.

When I look at our interpretation of the Religio Romana within NR, what
I see is an attempt to restore the Religio *as it was practiced in the
late Republic* as nearly as is possible. I think this effort is based
on several underlying assumptions which I'll list here. I invite the
pontifexes to comment and correct any misinterpretation.

Near the end of the late Republic, Rome was enjoying the favor of the
Gods because:

-- The Teutoni had been defeated and destroyed
-- Gaul had been conquered
-- Britannia had been neutralized as a source of support for the Gauls,
and opened up for future colonization
-- Mare Nostrum had been cleared of pirates
-- Sicilia was secure
-- Egypt was secure
-- Africa province was secure
-- The Social Wars were over
-- The Civil War was over
-- The Pax Romana was beginning

Given all of these things, a believer would conclude that Rome was doing
well because the Gods were pleased. That believer would further
conclude that if we in our modern time wanted to bring back widespread
peace similar to the Pax Romana, the way to do so would be to restore
the practices involved in worshiping the Gods so they would once again
have things the way they liked them.

That's what I see as the core idea behind restoration of the Religio.
Make the Gods happy again, and the Pax Deorum returns.

Now I can think of several philosophical arguments that can be raised to
call that chain of reason into question, but that's not my point. For a
straightforward restorationist, the whole idea is to get the essential
stuff back to the way it was then, and keep it that way. The only
question is "What's essential?" Do the Gods want blood sacrifice? Do
the Gods want physical temples? Do the Gods want public religious
festivals? It's those questions, and not questions about how the
Religio was practiced 700 years earlier, that the Collegium Pontificum
must be concerned with.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27568 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Salvete,

L. Cornelius Sulla wrote:

> Is this like, NASA setting aside half of their offices for
> proponets of UFO life?

Are you familiar with the SETI program?

No, it's nothing like half the NASA budget, but it is there.

Valete,

-- M
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27569 From: Jason Nickerson Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Lands from taxation.
Yes, thank you. I certainly will drum up some participation in my area. Actually, if you would be so kind as to give me more information about rallies, conventions and meetings, who I need to report them to and so on, I would be thankful. You can send it to jnickerson1977@.... I appreciate you offering your help and support. I will keep in touch with you.
Hortensius
Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:
Salvete:
nothing is stopping you this minute from organizing a U.S, and
Australian etc...Conventus..have the will the desire..I have 3 active
cives and we almost had enough to host the european rally.
The PM has a very successful meeting in Maine so..go on.
valete
M. Arminia Maior Fabiana

Propraetrix Hiberniae
scriba Iuris et
Investigatio CFQ


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27570 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Salvete Quirites, et salve Flavia Lucilla,

k.a.wright wrote:

> But I, for one, have absolutely no wish to be represented by anyone who, in
> essence, is trying to force their will on the Gods instead of complying with
> the God's will for us.

Let me suggest that the people on the other side of this discussion are
not suggesting that we force our will on the Gods so much as they are
claiming that what the Gods want now is not the same as what the Gods
wanted two millennia ago, or possibly that they didn't even want the
blood sacrifices two millennia ago, but accepted them in good grace
because the meat fed the Quirites, who needed the nutrition.

Part of the effort of bringing the Religio back is in discovering the
desires of the immortals. I think that's an area in which reasonable
and devout people can differ.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27571 From: GAIVS IVLIANVS Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Concordia, the last Vestal?
Salvete omnes! Does anyone know if Coelia Concordia
was indeed the last Vestal to die after Gratianus shut
down the Aedes Vestae, if indeed he did? Valete!
Frater GAIVS IVLIVS IVLIANVS



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Messenger - Communicate in real time. Download now.
http://messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27572 From: Rodacilla Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Concordia, the last Vestal?
Indeed she was. She was Vestalis Maxima in 380 C.E.. The cult ended in 394 C.E..

Valete,
Rodacilla Modia Sappho

Gaivs Ivlianvs wrote:
Salvete omnes! Does anyone know if Coelia Concordia
was indeed the last Vestal to die after Gratianus shut
down the Aedes Vestae, if indeed he did? Valete!
Frater GAIVS IVLIVS IVLIANVS

---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27573 From: Mike Abboud Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
Ave,

My wife, daughter and I will be in Miami North beach (Gods allowing) tomorrow afternoon for about a week. If there are Any members of Nova Roma would like to get together with myself and family during that time I'd be happy to meet you.

Vale;
Tiberius Arcanus Agricola
mikeabboud@...
----- Original Message -----
From: Kaelus Iulius
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 2:14 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.


Yes, I second that. Anytime you're in Cincinnati, inform one of us
and we'll call a regional meeting. We could even find a horse-
friendly restaurant, Cato.

This also applies to any cive who happens to be in the SW Ohio area.
Just let me, Aggrippina, Metellus Postumianius, or Athanasius know. I
meant, the meeting and dinner part. Not the horse part. Umm... yeah.


-Kaelus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Agrippina Modia Aurelia"
<whiterose13.geo@y...> wrote:
> Salve Cato,
>
> Don't feel bad. If you're ever in Cincinnati you are more than
> welcome to come to my villa for bread, olive oil & wine. After
all,
> evil people have to stick together (at least until we can eliminate
> the competition) :)
>
> Vale,
>
> Agrippina
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
> <mlcinnyc@y...> wrote:
> > G. Equitius Cato F. Galerio AurelianoS.P.D.
> >
> > salve, Galerius Aurelianus.
> >
> > OK, I'm seeing a recurring oversight here. Everyone gets to poke
> > Cato, but then, when it comes time for the wine to get poured,
> > where's Cato? Nowhere to be found. Does anybody offer CATO
bread
> > and olive oil (mmmmm...olive oil....) Nope. As usual. Fine.
The
> > horse and I are going to get Chinese takeout and THEN you'll be
> > sorry. Hmph.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> > Who likes Chinese food better anyways. Sort of. OK, not really,
> > but there's a Point To Be Made here.
> >


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27574 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Results of voting in the Comita Centuriata
Salvete Quirites,

The Rogators have completed their work, and we now have a result.
I remind you all that voting occurs by centuries, and that if there is
no definite winner with a clear majority of the total number of voting
centuries, a process explained in the LEX FABIA DE RATIONE COMITIORUM
CENTURIATORUM, which can be found at
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2003-10-08-i.html

In the first round:

Pompeia Minuciua-Tiberia Strabo: 15 Centuries
Gaius Popillius Laenas: 14 Centuries
Tied: 11 Centuries
Needed: 21 Centuries

Since neither candidate received 21 centuries, the rogators proceeded to
the tie-breaking process required by the law.

In the second round:

Pompeia Minuciua-Tiberia Strabo: 20 Centuries
Gaius Popillius Laenas: 20 Centuries
Needed: 21 Centuries

According to the Lex Fabia de Ratione Comitiorum Centuriatorum, a tie in
Centuries is to be determined by lot. The coin toss went to Gaius
Popillius Laenas, so by the will of the Gods, Gaius Popillius Laenas is
elected Praetor.

My thanks to the rogators for their work, and to both candidates for
their willingness to serve.

I welcome Gaius Popillius Laenas to the Senate.

Valete,

--
Gn. Equitius Marinus
Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27575 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Results of voting in the Comita Populi Tributa
Salvete Quirites,

The rogators have completed their work, and we have results from the
voting in the Comitia Populi Tributa.

Quaestor:

There were a total of 32 tribes voting, with 2 being void for Quaestor
(i.e. no vote for either candidate). therefore the first candidate
taking 16 tribes is the winner.

Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus: 25 Tribes
Domitius Constantinus Fuscus: 5 Tribes

Winner: Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus

Curator Areneum:

There were a total of 32 tribes voting, with 3 being void for Quaestor
(i.e. no vote for either candidate). therefore the first candidate
taking 16 tribes is the winner.

Quintus Cassius Calvus: 29 Tribes

Winner: Quintus Cassius Calvus

Lex Equitia de Mutandis Appellationibus Duorum Magistratuum Minorum:

There were a total of 32 tribes voting, so a simple majority of 17
tribes is require to pass.

Yes: 28 Tribes
No: 4 Tribes
Abstain: 0 Tribes

The Lex Equitia de Mutandis Appellationibus Duorum Magistratuum Minorum
is Passed.

Lex Arminia Equitia de Sanctitate:

There were a total of 32 tribes voting, so a simple majority of 17
tribes is require to pass.

Yes: 20 Tribes
No: 11 Tribes
Abstain: 1 Tribe

Lex Arminia Equitia de Sanctitate Passes.

My congratulations to Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus and Quintus
Cassius Calvus, my thanks to all candidates for being willing to serve,
and my thanks to the rogators for their dedication and good work.

Valete,

--
Gn. Equitius Marinus
Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27576 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Congratulations Illustris Gaius Popillius Laenas!
Salve Illustris Gaius Popillius Laenas!

Please Illustris Gaius Popillius Laenas accept my warm congratulation!
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27577 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Congratulations Illustris Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus!
Salve Illustris Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus!

Congratulations Illustris Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus!
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27578 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Congratulations Illustris Quintus Cassius Calvus!
Salve Illustris Quintus Cassius Calvus!

Congratulations Illustris Quintus Cassius Calvus!
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27579 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Honorable Pompeia Minuciua-Tiberia Strabo!
Salve Honorable Pompeia Minuciua-Tiberia Strabo!

Thank You Honorable Pompeia Minuciua-Tiberia Strabo for a good
election! Better luck next time!
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27580 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Honorable Domitius Constantinus Fuscus!
Salve Honorable Domitius Constantinus Fuscus!

Thank You Honorable Domitius Constantinus Fuscus for a good election!
Better luck next time!
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27581 From: FAC Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: (no subject)
Salvete Omnes,
at the end I can have a PC here in Brasil and I am reading the
results of the elections.
I have not many time but please, let me send my sincere
congratulations to the three new elected magistrates, Gaius Popillius
Laenas, Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus and Quintus Cassius
Calvus. I am quite sure that you honour your own Magistracies and the
preference given you by the populus.
My greetings to my country-fellow and friend Domitius COnstantinus
Fuscus and my friend Pompeia Minucia-Tiberia Strabo. You tried but
the Fortuna did not assisted you this time. I am sure that you could
very good magistrates and I would strongly invite you to try again.

I come back to my pousada in Copacabana, I hope to check the NR mail
boxes as soon as possible.

Vale bene
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Senator et Tribunus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27582 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Congratulations to the new magistrates
Salvete


I want to extend my congratulations to the new
magistrates:
Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus, new Quaestor;
Quintus Cassius Calvus, new Curator Araneum/Magister
Araenarium;
And specially to Gaius Popillius Laenas, new Praetor
and Senator, i look forward to work with you.

Many thanks to Domitius Constantinus Fuscus and
Pompeia Minucia-Tiberia Strabo, for the participation,
and to the Rogatores.


Vale
M.Arminius Maior
Praetor





_______________________________________________________
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - navegue de graça com conexão de qualidade! Acesse: http://br.acesso.yahoo.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27583 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: ROMANS: A Proposed Constitutional amendment for your review and com
Salve Romans

Some discussions in the past have touched on the topic of ex post facto laws in Nova Roma and I would like to
submit a constitutional amendment for your review and comment. This is presented for the purpose of discussions and to elicit suggests both pro and con.

Background information

Main Entry: ex post facto law Function: noun

"a civil or criminal law with retroactive effect; especially : a law that retroactively alters a defendant's rights esp. by criminalizing and imposing punishment for an act that was not criminal or punishable at the time it was committed, by increasing the severity of a crime from its level at the time the crime was committed, by increasing the punishment for a crime from the punishment imposed at the time the crime was committed, or by taking away from the protections (as evidentiary protection) afforded the defendant by the law as it existed when the act was committed"


"ex post facto law, a law which operates by after enactment. The phrase is popularly applied to any law, civil or criminal, which is enacted with a retrospective effect, and with intention to produce that effect; but in its true application, as employed in American law, it relates only to crimes, and signifies a law which retroacts, by way of criminal punishment, upon that which was not a crime before its passage, or which raises the grade of an offense, or renders an act punishable in a more severe manner that it was when committed....."


Proposed Constitutional amendment

Article I section A is amended by adding a section A.3 a and b

which shall read

3. a. No ex post facto law, civil or criminal, was shall be allowed under this constitution
b. ex post facto shall be defined as any Lex passed by the comitia, decreta (decrees) of the priestly collegia, magisterial edicta (edicts) and Senatus consulta that impose a penalty of any kind for an action that occurred before said action was made illegal or subject to a penalty of any kind.


How Article I section would read if the amendment is adopted.

I Constitutional Basis
1.. This Constitution shall be the basic authority for all decision-making within Nova Roma and shall limit the authority of all magistrates and bodies, and all leges (laws) passed by the comitia, decreta (decrees) of the priestly collegia, magisterial edicta (edicts) and Senatus consulta shall be subject to it except as provided by the following two provisos:
1.. The edicta (edicts) of a dictator appointed under this Constitution may override its provisions, insofar as he is empowered to do so by the Senatus consultum enabling his appointment;
2.. This Constitution may be amended by a Lex passed by the comitia centuriata and approved by a vote of two thirds of the Senate.
3.. a. No ex post facto law was shall be allowed under this constitution b. ex post facto shall be defined as any Lex passed by the comitia, decreta (decrees) of the priestly collegia, magisterial edicta (edicts) and Senatus consulta that impose a penalty of any kind for an action that occurred before said action was made illegal or subject to a penalty of any kind.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Tribunus Plebs


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27584 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
Drusus,

You took this exact same path when you responded to Doris. Your responses to
Maxima Messalina were virtually identical to your previous posts on this same
subject. I am not defending her. I am defending civility on the ML. As
practitioners of the Religio, we do not have to defend our religious stance, but
we should be civil to someone who is not familiar with our practices. Maxima
Messalina presents her arguments based in much the same way that many
militantly minded Vegans and Vegetarians so often do. When someone embraces a
particular lifestyle, it is not uncommon to find that they have lost any objectivity
to arguments from those who do not embrace it. As a tobacconist, I have
frequently heard the old saw about how unhealthy and dangerous my smoking is to
myself and those around me. My usual response is "Just because you have had
enough doesn't mean the rest of us have."
I have tried the lifestyle of a lacto-ovarian vegetarian and it didn't work
for me. I have also participated in the butchery of hogs, deer, cattle, and
small furry woodland creatures. I like meat. "Bacon taste good. Pork chops
taste good" My ancestors did not spend 4.5 million years to get to the top of
the food chain so I could graze. To those citizens who do not eat me, I want to
say, "Dibs on your steak." Thanks for leaving more for me. To those who
object to animal sacrifice, I simply say, "You go to your church and I will go to
mine"

Aurelianus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27585 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Aurelianus to Cato & Nick
O.K. Cato.

You and Nick can come to the tent for wine of Limnos, bread, oil, and a few
olives. Nick can have some apples and beer. However, he cannot lie on the
couches. Why not, you ask with outrage? Because they are stuffed with horsehair
and Nick might be lying on his mother. That could leave him with a long face.
Of course, he does come from a stable home but enough horsing around.

Aurelianus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27586 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
F. Galerius Aurelianus S.P.D.

One thing I have learned in the last two years. Do not argue with Scaurus
when he makes such statements about Numa or the Religio. I bow to the superior
wisdom of the Curule Aedile.

Vale.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27587 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2004-08-13
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Salve, Fabiana.

Give it a rest, acushla. You have been defrocked (or, as we are Nova Romans,
de-laena'ed) and whatever the reason was, it has been set in stone (or
gigabytes). Just let it ride and practice your beliefs in the privacy of your home
and heart. The Collegium Pontificum has ruled and it cannot be overridden for
the foreseeable future. Rejoice! You may practice your personal beliefs to
your soul's content. Be well. Stay cool. Fly low.

Aurelianus.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27588 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: Note on animal sacrifice--Pax! Pax! Pax et Concordia.
G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.

Salvete, omnes.

Galerius Aurelianus is absolutely right in most respects here.

Let me, if I may, sum up the two basic arguments regarding animal
sacrifices from both sides.

THE MORAL ARGUMENT

Pro-Sacrifice:

Animals are not humans; they do not share our
abilities and rights as the lords of creation. They are put here
for our use, to use as we see fit, for our benefit --- whatever
benefit that might be: companionship, labor, food, etc. To try
to "anthropomorphize" them is an insult both to us humans and they
themelves, as it is contrary to the very natures of the two orders
of being (animal and human). The idea that humans are just
another "sort" of animal is a very new one, and has nothing to do
with the ancients' understanding.


Anti-Sacrifice:

The social, scientific, and ethical progress we
have made in the past two millenia have shown us the error of acting
as if the earth and all its resources (esp. animals in this case)
are expendable as long as we benefit from their use. The animal
kingdom (man excepted) deserves the same respect that we show
humans, because, in fact, you CANNOT except man from his place among
the animals. Our superior abilities as thinking, rational creatures
makes the burden we have to show respect to other animals even
*greater*. We know now that animals can think, reason, make
cognitive choices, even be taught human languages with
understanding. They feel pain, suffering, loneliness, depression,
anger, and love on a level that makes us responsible for treating
them with the respect they are due.



THE THEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT

Pro-Sacrifice:

The Di Immortales demand sacrifices. It is not our
place to decide whether or not They want them, or if They would be
willing to forgoe them. Historically, the Religio Romana revolved
around many kinds of sacrifices, and to deny the Gods what They will
is a crime against Them and causes a breach in Their relationship
with us. Even the God of the three great monotheisms has demanded
blood sacrifices to appease His anger and bring down His blessing.
We are not in a position to choose. "Not my will, but Thine be
done."



Anti-Sacrifice:

A) Pagan: there are numerous historical records which show that non-
bloody sacrifices are acceptable to the Gods. We can surely combine
our modern ethical understanding of the nature of animals'
consciousness with non-bloody examples from the ancients themselves.

B) Jewish:
"Sacrifice or oblation You wished not, but ears open to obedience
You gave me. Holocausts or sin-offerings You sought not...to do
Your will, O my G-d, is my delight." - Psalms 40:7,9

"What care I for the number of your sacrifices? I have had enough
of whole-burnt rams and fat of fatlings; in the blood of calves,
lambs, and goats I find no pleasure." - Isaiah 1:11

"Does the LORD so delight in holocausts and sacrifices as in
obedience to the command of the LORD? Obedience is better than
sacrifice, and submission than the fat of rams." - 1 Samuel 15:22

C) Christian:
"First He [Jesus] says, 'Sacrifices and offerings,
holocausts and sin offerings, You neither desired nor delighted
in'...By this 'will', we have been sanctified through the offering
of the Body of Jesus Christ once and for all. Every other priest
stands ministering day by day, and offering again and again those
acrifices which can never take away sin. But Jesus offered one
sacrifice for sins and took His seat forever at the right hand of
God; now He waits until His enemies are put under His feet. By one
offering He has forever perfected those who are being sanctified." -
Hebrews 10:8, 10-14


Now. The "moral argument" against sacrifices is on difficult
ground. We are endeavoring to recreate the Republican era of Rome,
and in that era, animal sacrifices were a part of daily life.
Whether or not we have evolved socially, or ethically, or
scientifically, the fact remains that the Romans of antiquity
sacrificed hundreds of thousands of animals to the Gods. That being
so, there is no reason why the practice cannot be revived *where it
is permitted by macronational law*. Slavery, while *technically*
not illegal in the US (although only the Federal Government can
impose it), is a morally reprehensible state, and even the ancients
acknowledged that. The enfranchisement of women is guaranteed by
macronational law. Human sacrifices are absolutely prohibited my
macronational law. These three then (slavery, womens' rights, and
human sacrifice) have no place in a discussion regarding animal
sacrifices.

The "theological" argument, however, is terra firma. It is the
reason that the CP desired, and created, the compromise which
exists; the recognition that there are, in fact, guaranteed by the
Constitution, the rights of citizens to worship as they see fit in
their religio privata; that the public *imposition* of a practice
abhorrent to many citizens was an unnecessary intrusion into the
private religious lives of those citizens. The CP recognizes that
it has no say whatsoever over the private beliefs of our citizens.
So, pagans, Jews, and Christians are perfectly free to oppose animal
sacrifices on private religious grounds. Only if the State itself
declares that the resumption of public animal sacrifices to the Gods
of Rome is *required* in order to uphold the ancient mos maiorum
will there be a serious conflict, and then only *specifically* for
the Jews, Christians, and Moslems among our citizens.

Until that time, then, we must accept the status quo.

valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27589 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Congratulations Laenas! : Results of voting in the Comita Centuriata
Salve Consul, salve Laenas, salvete omnes,

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@c...> wrote:

> According to the Lex Fabia de Ratione Comitiorum Centuriatorum, a
tie in
> Centuries is to be determined by lot. The coin toss went to Gaius
> Popillius Laenas, so by the will of the Gods, Gaius Popillius
Laenas is
> elected Praetor.
>
> My thanks to the rogators for their work, and to both candidates
for
> their willingness to serve.
>
> I welcome Gaius Popillius Laenas to the Senate.

Congratulations Gaius Popillius Laenas and welcome to the senate!
This is excellent news for Nova Roma! Serve well.

Valete,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27590 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: Results of voting in the Comita Populi Tributa
Salvete omnes,

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> My congratulations to Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus and
Quintus
> Cassius Calvus, my thanks to all candidates for being willing to
serve,
> and my thanks to the rogators for their dedication and good work.

Congratulations to Moravius Laureatus Armoricus and Quintus Cassius
Calvus for your victories. This is excellent news for Nova Roma!
Serve well.

Valete,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27591 From: Kaelus Iulius Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Nemoralia
I'd like to break with the usual tradition of debate on this list to
briefly share my experience with the gods.. it was truly a moving
one, for me at least.

First, I began by ritually purifying myself. I washed my hands and
forearms while asking for blessings, letting the water roll down my
arms as I did so. I then doused my hair in water, cleansing it
thoroughly. After which, I combed my hair, and continued on after
asking for blessings and purification from the Immortals again.


I went out in the dead of the night to gather flowers, of many kinds.
Roses, tropical flowers... pink, red, orange and white. I took these
in my hands inside, as I prepared a chalice for apple juice, the only
substitute I had that was suitable for wine (after purifying the
glass and all of the other wares). I cut a large section of fresh-
baked bread, and placed it on a small plate. I took an apple and a
branch of grapes, and washed them, afterwared placing them in an
ornamental glass bowl. Then, I poured a modest amount of olive oil
into a small dish, and carried all of this and the flowers upstairs.

I had cleaned my altar earlier, not used for years.. I strew the
flowers upon it, all seeming to fall in their proper place. I lit
three candles on saucers which I had set up just prior. One for
Vesta, one for Janus, and one for Diana. To this I set glass stones
surrounding the white candle, and took in the fragrance of pumpkins
from another. I set all of the wares and offerings down, and lit some
of the most fragrant incense I've ever smelled.. I then knelt down,
prayed, and performed the Nermoralia ritual. I offered burnt-
offerings of bread dipped in olive oil and grapes.

I had prayed for the continuing blessings upon Nova Roma, gens Modia,
myself, and my household. I asked Iupiter especially for blessings
concerning Nova Roma and the Modii. I gave praise to the gods invoked
in the ritual for their co-operation, and I must say.. I truly felt
them listening, and that the offerings were accepted.

I'm allowing them to sit now, as I purify myself for the third time,
then return to profane the foods, pour libations, and dispose of that
which was dedicated to the gods (Dea Diana). Afterwards, I will share
in the feast with Diana... while listening to traditional odes and
hymns. Blessed Nemoralia, all.


Vale bene,
Kaelus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27592 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: Results of voting in the Comita Centuriata
CONGRATULATIONS Gaius Popillius!!! A very well deserved Victory. When you do come out to California, I will buy you a bottle of wine!

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com ; NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com ; NovaRomaProvinciae@yahoogroups.com ; mediatlanticaprovincia@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 3:24 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Results of voting in the Comita Centuriata


Salvete Quirites,

The Rogators have completed their work, and we now have a result.
I remind you all that voting occurs by centuries, and that if there is
no definite winner with a clear majority of the total number of voting
centuries, a process explained in the LEX FABIA DE RATIONE COMITIORUM
CENTURIATORUM, which can be found at
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2003-10-08-i.html

In the first round:

Pompeia Minuciua-Tiberia Strabo: 15 Centuries
Gaius Popillius Laenas: 14 Centuries
Tied: 11 Centuries
Needed: 21 Centuries

Since neither candidate received 21 centuries, the rogators proceeded to
the tie-breaking process required by the law.

In the second round:

Pompeia Minuciua-Tiberia Strabo: 20 Centuries
Gaius Popillius Laenas: 20 Centuries
Needed: 21 Centuries

According to the Lex Fabia de Ratione Comitiorum Centuriatorum, a tie in
Centuries is to be determined by lot. The coin toss went to Gaius
Popillius Laenas, so by the will of the Gods, Gaius Popillius Laenas is
elected Praetor.

My thanks to the rogators for their work, and to both candidates for
their willingness to serve.

I welcome Gaius Popillius Laenas to the Senate.

Valete,

--
Gn. Equitius Marinus
Consul


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27593 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: Results of voting in the Comita Populi Tributa
Salve

> Quaestor:
>
> There were a total of 32 tribes voting, with 2 being void for Quaestor
> (i.e. no vote for either candidate). therefore the first candidate
> taking 16 tribes is the winner.
>
> Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus: 25 Tribes
> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus: 5 Tribes
>
> Winner: Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus

My congratulations to my adversary (just election-wise) Gaius Moravius Laureatus
Armoricus. I'm sure he'll do a great job as quaestor. As for me, better luck
next time I hope... in november :)

Vale

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
PF Constantinia
Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27594 From: Samantha Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: How I celebrated Nemoralia.
Salve everyone,
I greatly enjoyed Nemoralia today. Since I had the day off I made it
into an all day affair. I made libum (who knew that cheese would be
so much of a difficult pain in the rearend ro mash up *lol*) with my
daughter which ended up in a rather flour soaked kitchen by time we
were through (ok so she is four and not exaclty graceful with the
flour). I also started my morning with the daily rite to Diana as I
always do.
I hung prayers on a tree in front of my house with red strings and
set up my altar full of flowers that I had gathered this afternoon.
Gathering the flowers were no easy trick since I had not gardened
this year like I had planned and had to search for wild ones. And
since we have had a very hot and dry summer here, guess what was
difficult to find.. flowers. But I did get enough and my daughter
helped me to gather and to set them on to the altar.

I then bathed and combed my hair as is traditional around sunset. I
then lit the area of the altar up with candles (every candle I owned).
I then went outdoors with another candle and lit it out there, and
sang and danced onto my property in celebration of Diana, bearing the
torch. Thanking her for children granted and asking her of more
children to grace people and animals alike.

When I came indoors I set the candle among the others and began the
rite.

1)Light the sacred flame
2)Wash hands.
3)Perform ritual in the Greek fashion (with head bare).
4)Begin Praefatio and offerings to Janus first and then Vesta.
5)Begin invocation and prayers to Diana:

"Ave Diana, Latona's daughter, splendid child of Jove, mistress of
beasts and of bow. You who are called Lucina in childbirth, and
Nemorensis in the wood "

"On this night of Nemoralia, see now that your torches are lit
rejoicing in you who bear the first light; you who shine in the night
sky. You, great goddess who are first among women; your women come in
adoration to you on this night. We bear the torches through the dark
as we sing and dance to your pleasure. We come to your temple bearing
our offerings that you might be pleased and bestow your favor upon
us."

"I, Lucia Modia Lupa, recognize that no beast be harmed on this day
and no meat consumed *. I bring to your altar gifts on behalf of my
family, Gens Modia, and the people of Nova Roma. That injuries be
healed and the blessing of children upon those who desire it."


"Diana, as it is proper to offer to you today, for this shall you be
honoured by these offerings of incense and wine."

Take the incense and offer as follows:

"Diana, for sake of this shall you be honoured with this incense.
Make yourself willingly propitious to me, my house, my family, and
all of Nova Roma."

Offer the incense. Then take the wine and offer as follows:


"Diana, for sake of the same shall you be honoured with this wine.
Make yourself willingly propitious to me, my house,my family , and
all of Nova Roma."

Offer the wine

Diana, in order that a better condition may be with me, my home, my
family, and all of Nova Roma,for these things shall you be honoured
by these 'liba' ."

Offer bread or cakes by crumbling them into the fire:


6)If there are those specifically who need healing set forth effigies
of the parts needing healing. Made of clay preferably but possibly
also dough. I did not do this during this Nemoralia rite because
there was no particular individual I could think of in particular
need at this time. However the note is there anyway so I had planned
on the possibility of doing so. There is a good chance I would do
this part next year.

"Diana, you who are great in the healing arts. Lend your aid and
favor to (fill in the blank), so that he/she may suffer from it no
more."

7) I brought out my gift to Diana. It is something special that meant
alot to me. I recall that Diana is fond of pearls, though had no real
pearls. I did have a strand of false yellow pearls that were my great-
grandmother and passed down to me by my grandmother. It was a
treasured necklace for years. I felt it only fitting that since I did
not have much, to offer what I did have that was worth as much to me
as anything I could have bought or made.

""Dea Diana, I, Lucia Modia Lupa, ask that you accept these gifts on
behalf of my household, my family, Gens Modia, and all of Nova Roma.
That they may find pleasure with you, and direct your kind attention
upon us.

8)"Vale bene, accept our (my) prayers under any name by which it
pleases you to be addressed."

9)End with libation to Vesta.

I hope that all had a wonderful Nemoralia. I would like to note that
this is not any sort of an official ritual but rather was constructed
based off of what little information was available.

Lucia Modia Lupa


*The Greeks from whome this ritual of Nemoralia originated from in
their worship of Artemis and Hecate on this night. Would not eat meat
from the first of August until the fullmoon of August, or the 13th of
August Nemoralia.

P.S. I did take some pictures prior to the ritual with my digital
camera. I will see how they turned out. If anyone wants to see them
please let me know.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27595 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@c...>
wrote:
> Salvete omnes,
>
> At the risk of entering a religious discussion with my philosophical
> point of view, I'm going to offer some thoughts here...
>
> Maior wrote:
>
> > I suggest you and others read Pontifex Gryllus's references to King
> > Numa the founder of the Religio who forbade blood sacrifice.
>
> My whole problem with this is that historical research has shown that
> King Numa didn't do that. Just earlier today Scaurus again explained
> why the idea that Numa was Pythagorean was incorrect. Just because
Livy
> propogated it doesn't give it any special status. Claudius Ptolemy
> wrote a lot of stuff that was accepted as true for 1500 years until
> Johannes Kepler proved him wrong. I don't see anyone suggesting that
> Nova Roma reintroduce the Ptolemaic model of the solar system.
>
> When I look at our interpretation of the Religio Romana within NR, what
> I see is an attempt to restore the Religio *as it was practiced in the
> late Republic* as nearly as is possible. I think this effort is based
> on several underlying assumptions which I'll list here. I invite the
> pontifexes to comment and correct any misinterpretation.


Young King Numa Chopped down the Cherry Tree and told his Pater "I Can
not tell a lie"

OK That was George Washington, not King Numa, but it is a case of a
myth becomming attached to a man. Most people know the Cherry Tree
story isn't true. So what would we guess about people who attempted to
write American History around that myth with no regard for it's
truthfulness? Would it be wrong to assume that they had some agenda?

There is a long standing tension in the Pagan Community between
traditionalists and New Age Pagans. The Later often try to take parts
of traditional Pagan Religions and use it to justify their belief
systems. Many Traditionalists resent this at any level. It has
actually led to a declaration of War by the Lakota and Nakota Sioux
against New Age Pagans who exploit their religion.

It also leads to tensions when New Age Pagans enter a traditional
group and attempt to use it to justify their beliefs, or to actually
change it's beliefs to those that they bought into the group.

The simple fact is the historic record dosen't support the concept of
religion without animal sacrifices in the ancient world. The written
sources that support the premise animal sacrifices vastly outnumbers
the tiny handfull that support a contrary viewpoint, and the
archaeological record shows an unbroken record of animal sacrifices
from neolithic times until they were banned by the Christians.

So what we have here is some people attempting to change the Religio
Romana to something else, to something that suits their belief system
rather than accepting it as it actually was.

The Religio Romana is a pact between humans and the Immortals. It
isn't one of equals, it is a classic Roman Client Patron relationship.
As in any pact one side can't just make arbitray changes without
permission from the other side. Attempting to do so dosen't modify the
deal, it breaks it. It also shows an utter lack of respect for the
partner in an arrangement, be they human or Immortal.

A Long time ago there was an unimportant little village along the
Tiber River. There was no reason to suspect that the little collection
of huts would ever ammount to much. That little village did one
important thing, it paid the Immortals all of the honors that were due
them, and return the Immortals raised that dinky little village up to
being a great city that ruled the civilized world until the Romans
foolishly abbandoned the Gods that had made them great. Once they made
that error it wasn't long before the Romans were bowing before a
barbarian king.

The Immortals are quite capable of raising our little village of Nova
Roma up too, but I see no reason why they would do so if we place
pleasing humans above them.

L. Sicinius Drusus
Pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27596 From: Decimus Iunius Silanus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: Results of voting in the Comita Centuriata
Salve Luci Corneli,

Just a bottle? Cheapskate ;-)

Vale

Decimus Iunius Silanus


--- "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@...>
wrote:

---------------------------------
CONGRATULATIONS Gaius Popillius!!! A very well
deserved Victory. When you do come out to California,
I will buy you a bottle of wine!

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com ;
NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com ;
NovaRomaProvinciae@yahoogroups.com ;
mediatlanticaprovincia@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 3:24 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Results of voting in the Comita
Centuriata


Salvete Quirites,

The Rogators have completed their work, and we now
have a result.
I remind you all that voting occurs by centuries,
and that if there is
no definite winner with a clear majority of the
total number of voting
centuries, a process explained in the LEX FABIA DE
RATIONE COMITIORUM
CENTURIATORUM, which can be found at

http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2003-10-08-i.html

In the first round:

Pompeia Minuciua-Tiberia Strabo: 15 Centuries
Gaius Popillius Laenas: 14 Centuries
Tied: 11 Centuries
Needed: 21 Centuries

Since neither candidate received 21 centuries, the
rogators proceeded to
the tie-breaking process required by the law.

In the second round:

Pompeia Minuciua-Tiberia Strabo: 20 Centuries
Gaius Popillius Laenas: 20 Centuries
Needed: 21 Centuries

According to the Lex Fabia de Ratione Comitiorum
Centuriatorum, a tie in
Centuries is to be determined by lot. The coin toss
went to Gaius
Popillius Laenas, so by the will of the Gods, Gaius
Popillius Laenas is
elected Praetor.

My thanks to the rogators for their work, and to
both candidates for
their willingness to serve.

I welcome Gaius Popillius Laenas to the Senate.

Valete,

--
Gn. Equitius Marinus
Consul


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service.






___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27597 From: L. Cornelius Sulla Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: Results of voting in the Comita Centuriata
When he gets elected for Consul he will get more! <g>

One step at a time!

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Decimus Iunius Silanus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 1:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Results of voting in the Comita Centuriata


Salve Luci Corneli,

Just a bottle? Cheapskate ;-)

Vale

Decimus Iunius Silanus


--- "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@...>
wrote:

---------------------------------
CONGRATULATIONS Gaius Popillius!!! A very well
deserved Victory. When you do come out to California,
I will buy you a bottle of wine!

Vale,

Sulla
----- Original Message -----
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com ;
NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com ;
NovaRomaProvinciae@yahoogroups.com ;
mediatlanticaprovincia@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 3:24 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Results of voting in the Comita
Centuriata


Salvete Quirites,

The Rogators have completed their work, and we now
have a result.
I remind you all that voting occurs by centuries,
and that if there is
no definite winner with a clear majority of the
total number of voting
centuries, a process explained in the LEX FABIA DE
RATIONE COMITIORUM
CENTURIATORUM, which can be found at

http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2003-10-08-i.html

In the first round:

Pompeia Minuciua-Tiberia Strabo: 15 Centuries
Gaius Popillius Laenas: 14 Centuries
Tied: 11 Centuries
Needed: 21 Centuries

Since neither candidate received 21 centuries, the
rogators proceeded to
the tie-breaking process required by the law.

In the second round:

Pompeia Minuciua-Tiberia Strabo: 20 Centuries
Gaius Popillius Laenas: 20 Centuries
Needed: 21 Centuries

According to the Lex Fabia de Ratione Comitiorum
Centuriatorum, a tie in
Centuries is to be determined by lot. The coin toss
went to Gaius
Popillius Laenas, so by the will of the Gods, Gaius
Popillius Laenas is
elected Praetor.

My thanks to the rogators for their work, and to
both candidates for
their willingness to serve.

I welcome Gaius Popillius Laenas to the Senate.

Valete,

--
Gn. Equitius Marinus
Consul


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service.






___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27598 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
G. Equitius Cato L. Sicinio Druso S.P.D.

Salve, Sicinius Drusus.

At the risk of sounding intemperate, I disagree heartily with this
particular statement:

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "John Dobbins" <drusus@b...> wrote:

>the Immortals raised that dinky little village up to
> being a great city that ruled the civilized world until the Romans
> foolishly abbandoned the Gods that had made them great. Once they
> made that error it wasn't long before the Romans were bowing
>before a barbarian king.
> L. Sicinius Drusus
> Pontifex

CATO: the idea that Rome fell "because of" Christianity is one that
has long passed into the realm of foolish history. The Roman
Empire, as it considered itself, lasted *at least* until May of A.D.
1453 --- another 1000 years *after* the Western imperial regalia
were sent by Odoacer to the Emperor Zeno in Constantinople. The
amount of time (A.D. 313 to A.D. 1453) that the Roman Empire was
Christian is much longer than the amount of time it was pagan (27
B.C. to A.D. 313)--- indeed the amount of time the empire was
Christian was as long if not longer than the entire period of Rome's
existence as a pagan entity. Remember that the ancients themselves
considered the Eastern Empire to be, in fact, the Roman Empire, and
the emperors in Constantinople styled themselve as "Basileus
Romaoi" , or "Emperor of the Romans". I would assume, Sicinius
Drusus, that you would not put yourself in opposition to the
ancients. Let's drop the needless antagonism against Christianity.

vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27599 From: Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: How I celebrated Nemoralia.
Salve Lucia Modia et omnes,

I was with you in spirit celebrating the festival of Diana
yesterday. I began in the late afternoon, decorating my home with
flowers and candles floating in bowls of water. My three "hounds"
(actually cats) were adorned with new collars, and the tree outside
my apartment decorated with prayers to Diana on ribbons.

After a ritual bath, I combed my hair, leaving my head bare for the
ritual as in the Greek rites.

I began my procession behind my home, walking in and dancing through
every room with lighted candle in hand, Lighting the floating
candles as I passed them. I then lit the sacred flame on the altar,
using small pine cones and a bit of alcohol to sustain the flame.

I then made offerings of incense to Ianus, Iupiter, and Vesta before
beginning the invocation and prayers to Diana:
"Ave Diana, Latona's daughter, splendid child of Jove, mistress of
beasts and of bow. You who are called Lucina in childbirth, and
Nemorensis in the wood. .

"On this night of Nemoralia, we have lit your torches, and are
rejoicing in you who bear the first light, you who shine in the
night sky. You are first among women, and we come to you in
adoration. We bear the torches through the dark as we sing and dance
to your pleasure. We come to your temple bearing our offerings that
you might be pleased and bestow your favor upon us.

"We recognize that no beast be harmed on this day and no meat
consumed *. I bring to your altar gifts on behalf of my family, Gens
Moravia, and the people of Nova Roma, that our injuries might be
healed and your blessings bestowed upon us.

"Dea Diana, as it is proper to offer to you today, may you be
honoured by these offerings of incense and wine."

I offered the incense as follows:

"Dea Diana, may you be honored by this offering of incense, and look
kindly upon me, my house, my family, and the people of Nova Roma."

I offered the wine as follows:

"Dea Diana, may you be honored by this offering of wine, and look
kindly upon me, my house, my family, and the people of Nova Roma."

I offered spelt cakes to Diana as follows:

"Dea Diana, in order that a better condition may be with me, my
home, my family, and all of Nova Roma, for these things shall you be
honoured by these 'liba' ."

I offered gifts to Diana. These included amethyst, moonstone, and an
amethyst necklace I made for her recently:

"Dea Diana, I ask that you accept these gifts on behalf of my
household, my family, Gens Moravia, and all of Nova Roma. I pray
that they may pleasure you, and direct your kind attention upon us.

"Vale bene, accept my prayers under any name by which it pleases you
to be addressed."

The ritual ended with a final libation to Vesta.

Afterward, I celebrated with a small group of friends over a meal of
seasonal vegetables, spelt cakes, and wine. We lit sparklers in the
night sky to honor Dea Diana.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27600 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: My Thanks
G. Popillius Laenas Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit,

My thanks to everyone who voted for and supported me in the Praetor
election. Obyoiusly, with out every bit of support, I would not
have been sucesful in such a close race.

My thanks also to Pompeia Minucia Tiberia Strabo for her willingnss
to serve and for running an honorable campaign. I wish he the best
in the future.

Vale bene.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27601 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Oath of Office
Gaius Popillius Laenas Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit,

I, Gaius Popillius Laenas (John Keith Sterne) do hereby solemnly
swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the
best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Gaius Popillius Laenas (John Keith
Sterne) swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public
dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private
life.

I, Gaius Popillius Laenas (John Keith Sterne) swear to uphold and
defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and
swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as the
State Religion.

I, Gaius Popillius Laenas (John Keith Sterne) swear to protect and
defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Gaius Popillius Laenas (John Keith Sterne) further swear to
fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of
Praetor to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the
Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor,
do I accept the position of Praetor and all the rights, privileges,
obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27602 From: Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: Nemoralia
Salve Kaelus Iulius,

Thank you so much for sharing your personal Nemoralia ritual with
us. It brings joy to my heart to read that Diana's festival day was
an important one for you.

vale bene,
Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Kaelus Iulius" <xkaelusx@y...>
wrote:
> I'd like to break with the usual tradition of debate on this list
to
> briefly share my experience with the gods.. it was truly a moving
> one, for me at least.
>
> First, I began by ritually purifying myself. I washed my hands and
> forearms while asking for blessings, letting the water roll down
my
> arms as I did so. I then doused my hair in water, cleansing it
> thoroughly. After which, I combed my hair, and continued on after
> asking for blessings and purification from the Immortals again.
>
>
> I went out in the dead of the night to gather flowers, of many
kinds.
> Roses, tropical flowers... pink, red, orange and white. I took
these
> in my hands inside, as I prepared a chalice for apple juice, the
only
> substitute I had that was suitable for wine (after purifying the
> glass and all of the other wares). I cut a large section of fresh-
> baked bread, and placed it on a small plate. I took an apple and a
> branch of grapes, and washed them, afterwared placing them in an
> ornamental glass bowl. Then, I poured a modest amount of olive oil
> into a small dish, and carried all of this and the flowers
upstairs.
>
> I had cleaned my altar earlier, not used for years.. I strew the
> flowers upon it, all seeming to fall in their proper place. I lit
> three candles on saucers which I had set up just prior. One for
> Vesta, one for Janus, and one for Diana. To this I set glass
stones
> surrounding the white candle, and took in the fragrance of
pumpkins
> from another. I set all of the wares and offerings down, and lit
some
> of the most fragrant incense I've ever smelled.. I then knelt
down,
> prayed, and performed the Nermoralia ritual. I offered burnt-
> offerings of bread dipped in olive oil and grapes.
>
> I had prayed for the continuing blessings upon Nova Roma, gens
Modia,
> myself, and my household. I asked Iupiter especially for blessings
> concerning Nova Roma and the Modii. I gave praise to the gods
invoked
> in the ritual for their co-operation, and I must say.. I truly
felt
> them listening, and that the offerings were accepted.
>
> I'm allowing them to sit now, as I purify myself for the third
time,
> then return to profane the foods, pour libations, and dispose of
that
> which was dedicated to the gods (Dea Diana). Afterwards, I will
share
> in the feast with Diana... while listening to traditional odes and
> hymns. Blessed Nemoralia, all.
>
>
> Vale bene,
> Kaelus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27603 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Investment of Imperium
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus civibus Novis Romanis S.P.D.

I, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus, as a Lictor Curiatus of Nova Roma and a
member of the Comitia Curiata, hereby witness and acknowledge the
passing of Imperium - the power to carry out elected duties and uphold
the laws - to Gaius Popillius Laenas as Praetor Suffectus for the
remainder of this year, MMDCCLVII ab urbe condita.

May the Gods and the spirit of Roma Antiqua watch over this magistrate
of Nova Roma, and grant him the guidance and wisdom to use his
Imperium for the positive furtherance of Romanitas. May this sacred
bond bring favor upon our Nation and our Citizens.

Valete,

Gn. Equitius Marinus
Lictor Curiatus and Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27604 From: Greg Rose Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Investment of Imperium
G. Iulius Scaurus S. P. D.

Salvete, Quirites.

I, Gaius Iulius Scaurus, Lictor Curiatus Novae Romae, hereby witness the
investment of Gaius Popollius Laenas with the imperium praetoris in
the consulship of Cn. Salix Astur and Gn. Equitius Marinus. Di
Immortales, vos bonas preces precor ut istum praetorem recte ducatis.

Valete.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Lictor Curiatus, Flamen Quirinalis, Pontifex et Aedilis Curulis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27605 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Investment of Imperium
Salvete:

I hereby witness the investment of Imperium upon Praetor Gaius Popollius
Laenas.

May the Gods be honored!

Valete;

Gaius Modius Athanasius
Lictor Curiatus, Flamen Pomonalis, Pontifex, and Augur


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27606 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Edictum Proconsulare de Creatione Magistri Araneari
Ex Officio Proconsulis Gnaei Equiti Marini

EDICTVM PROCONSVLARE AMERICAE MEDIATLANTICAE PROVINCIAE
A GNAEO EQVITIO MARINO

De Creatione Magistri Araneari

Concerning the Appointment of a Webmaster


Gn. Equitius Marinus Proconsul Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit.


Hoc edicto, Flavius Vedius Germanicus Magister Aranearius Mediatlanticae
Provinciae creatur.

Flavius Vedius Germanicus is hereby appointed Webmaster for Mediatlantica
Provincia.


Hoc edictum statim valet.

This edict is effective immediately.


Datum sub manu mea in America Mediatlantica Provincia ante diem
XIX Kal. SEPTEMBRES MMDCCLVII a.u.c.

Given under my hand in America Mediatlantica Provincia this 12th day of
August 2004 C.E.


Gnaeo Salici Asturi Gnaeo Equitio Marino Consulibus.

In the Consulship of Gnaeus Salix Astur and Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27607 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Salve Aureliane;

as the Flamen Cerealis I do hope you show more interest in the rights
of the plebs,
finally and lastly one more note on address thanks to my friend
Cordus:
an adopted civis such as myself or young Metellus are not referred
to as Fabiana or Postumianus, Maior, Arminia, or Marca Arminia will
do fine, and never 'acushla'- (darling), entirely lacking in dignitas
and unRoman.
bene vale
M. Arminia Maior Fabiana





In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@a... wrote:
> Salve, Fabiana.
>
> Give it a rest, acushla. You have been defrocked (or, as we are
Nova Romans,
> de-laena'ed) and whatever the reason was, it has been set in stone
(or
> gigabytes). Just let it ride and practice your beliefs in the
privacy of your home
> and heart. The Collegium Pontificum has ruled and it cannot be
overridden for
> the foreseeable future. Rejoice! You may practice your personal
beliefs to
> your soul's content. Be well. Stay cool. Fly low.
>
> Aurelianus.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27608 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: Investment of Imperium
Salvete,

I hereby witness the investment of Imperium upon Praetor Gaius Popollius
Laenas.

Valete,

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
Lictor Curiatus
Propraetor
America Medioccidentalis Superior Province

--

iChatAV/AIM: RomanHillbilly
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27609 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Oath of Office
I, Quintus Cassius Calvus (Richard Arthur Malley) do hereby solemnly
swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the
best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Quintus Cassius Calvus (Richard
Arthur Malley) swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my
public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and
private life.

I, Quintus Cassius Calvus (Richard Arthur Malley) swear to uphold
and defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and
swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as the
State Religion.

I, Quintus Cassius Calvus (Richard Arthur Malley) swear to protect
and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Quintus Cassius Calvus (Richard Arthur Malley) further swear to
fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of
Magister Aranearius to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the
Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor,
do I accept the position of Magister Aranearius and all the rights,
privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27610 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Edict of appointment of Scriba
As Magister Aranearius I do exercise my privilege as per the Lex
Labienia de Edictium Vigintisexviris to appoint the following Nova
Romans as scribes to assist me in the duties of managing Nova Roma's
website:

Flavius Vedius Germanicus
Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
Franciscus Apulus Caesar

An oath of office shall not be required of the above individuals.

This edictum takes force immediately.

Given on August 14, 2757, in the consulship of Gnaeus Salix Astur
and Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27611 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Thank you's and other stuff
Salvete,

Thank you to those that took time out of their day to go to the
Cista and cast their vote no matter for whom they voted.

I am not promising that next week Nova Roma will have a brand
spanking new wiz-bang website that will make Bill Gates drool. In
fact I promise that the lay out and general format will remain
exactly as it now. What needs to be done is update the content and
come the end of my term hand over to the next Magister Aranearius a
website that has current and accurate data so that whomever he or
she may be will be able to undertake the task of performing any
cosmetic changes for the better while keeping it current.

Valete,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Magister Aranearius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27612 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Investment of Imperium; Witnessing of Priesthood Appointments
Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Senatui Populoque Quiritium Romano salutem dicit

As a lictor of the Comitia Curiata, I, Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus, acknowledge and witness the investment of Imperium into Caius Popillius Laenus, Praetor Suffectus, for the duration of the consulship of Cnaeus Salix and Cnaeus Equitius.

As a lictor of the Comitia Curiata, I, Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus, also acknowledge and witness the ascension to priesthood of Flavius Galerius Aurelianus (Flamen Cerealis), Lucia Modia Lupa (Sacerdos Aedis Dianae), and Agrippina Modia Aurelia (Sacerdos Aedis Necessitatis).

Di nos protegant!

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumius
Lictor Curiatus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27613 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
she is right. in the usa rats, piegeons, pedophiles,
gangbangers, all have rights. dont let liberals
destroy or dictate nova roma policy. stay the course!
--- alexious@... <alexious@...>
wrote:
> Animals are protected by law but that does not mean
they have rights. There is a big difference there. I
am aware that animals have their defenders as well.
But what is next, Plant rights? Tree rights? Dirt
rights? They all fit in your little paradigm about
not being able to speak up and defend themselves.
>
> Vale,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Maxima
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 10:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Sacrifice Fund
>
>
>
> "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@...>
wrote:
> Animals do not hold any rights. If they
did....and one kills another....does that mean the
animal that killed goes to jail?
>
> There is logic missing from your arguement,
Maxima, and that is probably because you are to
emotionally involved. Please take a step back and
reflect a bit. Because, animals have no rights.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> Oh, but they do. You may wish they didn't. That
would make it so much easier to perform animal
sacrifices. But this is not ancient Rome. This is the
USA and in this country, animals have rights and are
protected by laws.
>
> I don't mean to insult anyone's beliefs. Believe
whatever you want but you have not the right to impose
your beliefs on another. Of course, you wouldn't try
that with another person because they can speak up and
defend themselves. Animals cannot, but that does not
mean they are without their defenders. It is you who
should reflect on what I am saying. I am just pointing
out a fact: in this country, animals have rights and
they have their defenders. That's all.
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile
phone.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an
email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
>


=====
S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27614 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Salve,

I think you are missing the thrust of Drusus' point.

It's not that the mere fact that Christianity existed (and flourished)
within the Roman Empire that led to its eventual downfall. If all the
Empire had been Christian, and yet honored its obligations to the Gods
of Rome, I think They would not have turned Their backs on Rome.

It was the fact that Rome, as a nation, abandoned those rites and
practices that maintained the pact between the Roman people and the Gods
of Rome. When those rites and practices were maintained, Rome triumphed.
When they were abandoned, the Gods in turn abandoned Rome, and its fall
was the result.

Just because that downfall took longer to hit the east than it did the
west, is irrelevant. When they honored Iuppiter Optimus Maximus, Rome
won. When they turned to the worship of Jehovah of Sinai, Rome lost. You
do the math.

Vale,

Flavius Vedius Germanicus
Pater Patriae



gaiusequitiuscato wrote:

> G. Equitius Cato L. Sicinio Druso S.P.D.
>
> Salve, Sicinius Drusus.
>
> At the risk of sounding intemperate, I disagree heartily with this
> particular statement:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "John Dobbins" <drusus@b...> wrote:
>
> >the Immortals raised that dinky little village up to
> > being a great city that ruled the civilized world until the Romans
> > foolishly abbandoned the Gods that had made them great. Once they
> > made that error it wasn't long before the Romans were bowing
> >before a barbarian king.
> > L. Sicinius Drusus
> > Pontifex
>
> CATO: the idea that Rome fell "because of" Christianity is one that
> has long passed into the realm of foolish history. The Roman
> Empire, as it considered itself, lasted *at least* until May of A.D.
> 1453 --- another 1000 years *after* the Western imperial regalia
> were sent by Odoacer to the Emperor Zeno in Constantinople. The
> amount of time (A.D. 313 to A.D. 1453) that the Roman Empire was
> Christian is much longer than the amount of time it was pagan (27
> B.C. to A.D. 313)--- indeed the amount of time the empire was
> Christian was as long if not longer than the entire period of Rome's
> existence as a pagan entity. Remember that the ancients themselves
> considered the Eastern Empire to be, in fact, the Roman Empire, and
> the emperors in Constantinople styled themselve as "Basileus
> Romaoi" , or "Emperor of the Romans". I would assume, Sicinius
> Drusus, that you would not put yourself in opposition to the
> ancients. Let's drop the needless antagonism against Christianity.
>
> vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
> *Yahoo! Groups Sponsor*
> ADVERTISEMENT
> click here
> <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=129g3qkjv/M=298184.5285298.6392945.3001176/D=groups/S=1705313712:HM/EXP=1092574813/A=2164330/R=0/SIG=11eamf8g4/*http://www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60183350>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Yahoo! Groups Links*
>
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27615 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-08-14
Subject: Fw: SPQR Ring
Salve Romans FYI

Nova Romans seem to talk and talk and talk you said you wanted a ring a a great ring was designed but so far 7 orders and that's it


Nova Roma talk and talk and talk

TGP

----- Original Message -----
From: MIKE CARROLL
To: Stephen Gallagher
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: SPQR Ring


Tim,

I received the five orders and will stand by my word
to fulfill them at the original price I quoted. I am
honoring this price level in hopes that those people
who receive the ring will help spread the word as to
the rings high-quality and exacting craftsmanship.
As you might expect I am disappointed in the number
received from the amount implied in our original
discussions.

Because I did not receive the $400 commissioning fee
to make the original SPQR design, and the volume is
not there, I am forced to raise the price on all
future SPQR rings to the level of the Centurion ring
in the Carroll Collection of United States Eagle
rings. Please be advise that the SPQR ring is now
priced at $159 in sterling silver, $540 in 10 karat
gold, $760 in 14 karat white or yellow gold and $995
in white or yellow gold. All sizes are available but
sizes over 13 are an additional $25.

Im planning to contact the Nova Roma members in hopes
of getting a few more orders. I have spent
considerable time on this ring and it really came out
nicer than I expected. It is truly a one-of-a-kind
ring and I believe it would be a shame to not promote
it.

I would appreciate any help or advise in promoting
this ring.

Mike

--- Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:

> Hi Mike
>
> The Picture has been posted to our yahoo site
>
> I have 5 paid orders that I will put in the mail on
> Thursday and will ask the others who made a
> commitment for the ring to send theirs in as well.
>
>
> All of your efforts are VERY MUCH APPRECIATED I
> apologies for the slowness of our members response
> and will do all I can to get them off their butts.
>
>
> Thanks for all the work
>
> Tim Gallagher
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: MIKE CARROLL
> To: Stephen Gallagher
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 4:28 PM
> Subject: Re: SPQR Ring
>
>
> Tim, In one of my emails to you that you posted on
> the
> Nova Roma board, Bill Hogue, one of the members,
> emailed me asking for a photo of the ring. After I
> completed the ring, I sent a copy to you as well
> as
> Bill Hogue. Apparently he posted it on the Nova
> Roma
> board.
>
> Please be advised that I have taken the initiative
> to
> complete the ring without the compensation
> and it is now ready for your members. Also please
> note
> that I have spent considerable time on this ring.
>
> Are you planning to make an announcement to the
> SPQR
> group that the ring available? Can you send an
> email
> with a photo to the entire group? What steps
> should I
> take to make the group aware that it is available?
> I
> think we should discuss what efforts need to be
> taken
> to promote the ring. Please call or email me at
> your
> earliest convenience.
>
> --- Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
> > Hi Mike
> >
> > Great
> >
> > I will call in a day or two.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Tim
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: MIKE CARROLL
> > To: Stephen Gallagher
> > Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 12:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: SPQR Ring
> >
> >
> > Tim, I have completed the SPQR ring and was
> > planning
> > to post it on our website or develop a
> separate
> > site
> > for marketing. Are you prepared to submit the
> 20
> > orders? Please respond though email or give me
> a
> > call
> > ASAP. Thanks. Mike
> >
> > --- Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
> > > Hi Mike
> > >
> > > No I have not forgotten you or you gorgeous
> SPQR
> > > Ring. We have been trying to get as many
> orders
> > as
> > > possible. Right now we have 20 people signed
> up
> > to
> > > buy the SPQR ring. Is enough to get started?
>
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Tim Gallagher
> > > spqr753@...
> >
> >
> > =====
> > Mike Carroll
> > United States Eagle Rings
> > http://www.eaglerings.com
> > or - http://www.carrollcollection.com
> > 16144 Port Clinton Rd.
> > Prairie View, IL 60069
> > 847-821-1333
> > mike@...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad
> campaign!
> >
> >
>
>
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/
> >
>
>
> =====
> Mike Carroll
> United States Eagle Rings
> http://www.eaglerings.com
> or - http://www.carrollcollection.com
> 16144 Port Clinton Rd.
> Prairie View, IL 60069
> 847-821-1333
> mike@...
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>


=====
Mike Carroll
United States Eagle Rings
http://www.eaglerings.com
or - http://www.carrollcollection.com
16144 Port Clinton Rd.
Prairie View, IL 60069
847-821-1333
mike@...



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27616 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Flavius Vedius Germanicus
<germanicus@g...> wrote:
> Salve,
> <SNIP>

When those rites and practices were maintained, Rome triumphed.
> When they were abandoned, the Gods in turn abandoned Rome, and its
fall was the result.
>
> Just because that downfall took longer to hit the east than it did
the west, is irrelevant. When they honored Iuppiter Optimus Maximus,
Rome > won. When they turned to the worship of Jehovah of Sinai,
Rome lost. You do the math.



CATO: let's take a look at how the Romans fared, Vedius
Germanicus. Let history "do the math":


Battle of the Allia River - 386 BC
A large force of 70,000 Gauls defeats a half as large group of
Romans sent to stop their march on Rome. The city is abandoned and
the Celts sack it.

Battle of Vesuvius - 339 BC
The rebellious Latins defeat Romans under P. Decius Mus

Defeat at the Claudine Forks - 321 BC
As a result of Samnite tactics and the carelessness of the Roman
consuls, the Roman army found itself trapped between two mountain
passes at a place known as the Claudine Forks. They made hopeless
attempts to scale the steep surrounding slopes before finally
resigning themselves to suing for peace with the Samnites.

Battle of Lautulae - 316 BC
Romans are defeated by the Samnites.

Battle of Camerinum - 298 BC
Samnites defeat the Romans under Lucius Cornelius Scipio in the
first battle of the Third Samnite War.

Battle of Arretium - 285 BC
A Roman army under Lucius Caecilius is destroyed by the Gauls.

Battle of Asculum - 279 BC
Pyrrhus of Epirus mets the Roman army for the second time at
Asculum. During the brutal fighting, Pyrrhus is wounded in the arm
with a javelin. Using elephants and a strong phalanx, he succeeds in
defeating the Romans for the second time. While he killed 6000
Romans (twice as many as his own), Pyrrhus' losses are far more
serious, since many of his officers were killed and he cannot
recruit new troops. Origin of the term "Pyrrhic Victory".

Battle of the Lipara Islands - 260 BC
A Roman naval force is defeated by the Carthaginians.

Battle of Drepana - 249 BC
Carthaginians under Adherbal defeat the fleet of Roman admiral
Claudius Pulcher.

Battle of Telamon – 225 BC
Rome reaps its revenge on the Celts, when 70,000 tribesmen from Cis-
Alpine Gaul foray into central Italy. The Romans confront them and
slaughter 40,000 at the Battle of Telamon. As a result the Po River
Valley is conquered to ensure that the Celts of northern Italy do
not threaten Rome again.

Battle of Lake Trasimene – 217 BC
During the Second Punic War, Hannibal invades Italy, destroying a
Roman army of roughly 25,000 on the shores of Lake Trasimene in one
of the largest ambushes ever executed in war.

Battle of Cannae – 216 BC
Desperate to stop Hannibal, Rome sends a massive army of 90,000 men.
In what is probably the classic battle of all time, Hannibal
completely surrounds the Roman army and annihilates it. It is the
greatest defeat Rome ever suffers.

Battle of Callicinus - 171 BC
Perseus of Macedon defeats a Roman army under Publius Licinius
Crassus.

Battle of Arausio - 105 BC
Cimbri inflict a major defeat on the Roman army of Mallius Maximus.

Battle of Carrhae – 53 BC
Crassus foolishly decides to invade Parthia in the east and due to
his inept leadership 20,000 of his men are killed, including
himself. Roughly 7000 horse archers, re-supplied with arrows carried
in by camels during the battle, manage to defeat a Roman army of 7
legions.

Battle of Teutoburg Forest – AD 9
Three legions are destroyed by German forces on the far side of the
Rhine in one of the bloodiest battles of the early 1st century AD.



Not exactly a record of unblemished "triumph". Claiming victory
because God/the Gods are "on your side" is a meaningless waste of
effort and cannot be used to support a religious infrastructure.
Remember, I am NOT attacking the religio; I am merely refuting a
claim that support for/abandonment of any set of religious beliefs
was the cause of the collapse of the Western Empire.



>
> Vale,
>
> Flavius Vedius Germanicus
> Pater Patriae

vale,

Cato
Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27617 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Salve, Cato.

I think "won" was meant in a more general sense than just a military
one. "Lost" I would take to be lost all, Rome the city, Western
Empire, infrastructure...Roman "society" I suppose. Least that is
how I read the post.

Vale
Caesar


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
<mlcinnyc@y...> wrote:
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Flavius Vedius Germanicus
> <germanicus@g...> wrote:
> > Salve,
> > <SNIP>
>
> When those rites and practices were maintained, Rome triumphed.
> > When they were abandoned, the Gods in turn abandoned Rome, and
its
> fall was the result.
> >
> > Just because that downfall took longer to hit the east than it
did
> the west, is irrelevant. When they honored Iuppiter Optimus
Maximus,
> Rome > won. When they turned to the worship of Jehovah of Sinai,
> Rome lost. You do the math.
>
>
>
> CATO: let's take a look at how the Romans fared, Vedius
> Germanicus. Let history "do the math":
>
>
> Battle of the Allia River - 386 BC
> A large force of 70,000 Gauls defeats a half as large group of
> Romans sent to stop their march on Rome. The city is abandoned and
> the Celts sack it.
>
> Battle of Vesuvius - 339 BC
> The rebellious Latins defeat Romans under P. Decius Mus
>
> Defeat at the Claudine Forks - 321 BC
> As a result of Samnite tactics and the carelessness of the Roman
> consuls, the Roman army found itself trapped between two mountain
> passes at a place known as the Claudine Forks. They made hopeless
> attempts to scale the steep surrounding slopes before finally
> resigning themselves to suing for peace with the Samnites.
>
> Battle of Lautulae - 316 BC
> Romans are defeated by the Samnites.
>
> Battle of Camerinum - 298 BC
> Samnites defeat the Romans under Lucius Cornelius Scipio in the
> first battle of the Third Samnite War.
>
> Battle of Arretium - 285 BC
> A Roman army under Lucius Caecilius is destroyed by the Gauls.
>
> Battle of Asculum - 279 BC
> Pyrrhus of Epirus mets the Roman army for the second time at
> Asculum. During the brutal fighting, Pyrrhus is wounded in the arm
> with a javelin. Using elephants and a strong phalanx, he succeeds
in
> defeating the Romans for the second time. While he killed 6000
> Romans (twice as many as his own), Pyrrhus' losses are far more
> serious, since many of his officers were killed and he cannot
> recruit new troops. Origin of the term "Pyrrhic Victory".
>
> Battle of the Lipara Islands - 260 BC
> A Roman naval force is defeated by the Carthaginians.
>
> Battle of Drepana - 249 BC
> Carthaginians under Adherbal defeat the fleet of Roman admiral
> Claudius Pulcher.
>
> Battle of Telamon – 225 BC
> Rome reaps its revenge on the Celts, when 70,000 tribesmen from
Cis-
> Alpine Gaul foray into central Italy. The Romans confront them and
> slaughter 40,000 at the Battle of Telamon. As a result the Po
River
> Valley is conquered to ensure that the Celts of northern Italy do
> not threaten Rome again.
>
> Battle of Lake Trasimene – 217 BC
> During the Second Punic War, Hannibal invades Italy, destroying a
> Roman army of roughly 25,000 on the shores of Lake Trasimene in
one
> of the largest ambushes ever executed in war.
>
> Battle of Cannae – 216 BC
> Desperate to stop Hannibal, Rome sends a massive army of 90,000
men.
> In what is probably the classic battle of all time, Hannibal
> completely surrounds the Roman army and annihilates it. It is the
> greatest defeat Rome ever suffers.
>
> Battle of Callicinus - 171 BC
> Perseus of Macedon defeats a Roman army under Publius Licinius
> Crassus.
>
> Battle of Arausio - 105 BC
> Cimbri inflict a major defeat on the Roman army of Mallius Maximus.
>
> Battle of Carrhae – 53 BC
> Crassus foolishly decides to invade Parthia in the east and due to
> his inept leadership 20,000 of his men are killed, including
> himself. Roughly 7000 horse archers, re-supplied with arrows
carried
> in by camels during the battle, manage to defeat a Roman army of 7
> legions.
>
> Battle of Teutoburg Forest – AD 9
> Three legions are destroyed by German forces on the far side of
the
> Rhine in one of the bloodiest battles of the early 1st century AD.
>
>
>
> Not exactly a record of unblemished "triumph". Claiming victory
> because God/the Gods are "on your side" is a meaningless waste of
> effort and cannot be used to support a religious infrastructure.
> Remember, I am NOT attacking the religio; I am merely refuting a
> claim that support for/abandonment of any set of religious
beliefs
> was the cause of the collapse of the Western Empire.
>
>
>
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Flavius Vedius Germanicus
> > Pater Patriae
>
> vale,
>
> Cato
> Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27618 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
G. Equitius Cato Gn. Iulio Caeso S.P.D.

Salve, Caesar.

I think that you are being generous. Both Vedius Germanicus and
Sicinius Drusus have often mentioned this thread of "when
Christianity took hold, everything was lost", but that is simply not
accurate historically. Paganism lost. Rome continued for another
1000 years. The Byzantine Empire stood as the glittering centre of
the world's civilizations for centuries, so even the social
implications are incorrect. And everyone in the ancient world
agreed that Rome continued --- until AD 1453.

vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
<gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
> Salve, Cato.
>
> I think "won" was meant in a more general sense than just a
military
> one. "Lost" I would take to be lost all, Rome the city, Western
> Empire, infrastructure...Roman "society" I suppose. Least that is
> how I read the post.
>
> Vale
> Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27619 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Salve, Cato.

Well, the Byzantine Empire it could be reasonably argued was hardly
Roman in nature. More Greek in influence in oh so many ways. As to
the date of its final termination, again many could argue that the
city fell in that year but the eastern empire (with tenuous
connection to Rome of Antiquity I would say) had fizzled away long
before. A sort of parallel in insignificance exists in Napoleon's
termination of the position of Holy Roman Emperor; a title that had
ceased to have any relevance (hardly holy, not Roman and not much of
an emperor either) years, possibly centuries before.

So...I think the date they are talking about has significance in the
sense of the final crushing of "true" Roman society.

Anyway it's all a matter of perspective I suppose.

Vale
Caesar


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
<mlcinnyc@y...> wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato Gn. Iulio Caeso S.P.D.
>
> Salve, Caesar.
>
> I think that you are being generous. Both Vedius Germanicus and
> Sicinius Drusus have often mentioned this thread of "when
> Christianity took hold, everything was lost", but that is simply
not
> accurate historically. Paganism lost. Rome continued for another
> 1000 years. The Byzantine Empire stood as the glittering centre
of
> the world's civilizations for centuries, so even the social
> implications are incorrect. And everyone in the ancient world
> agreed that Rome continued --- until AD 1453.
>
> vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
> <gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
> > Salve, Cato.
> >
> > I think "won" was meant in a more general sense than just a
> military
> > one. "Lost" I would take to be lost all, Rome the city, Western
> > Empire, infrastructure...Roman "society" I suppose. Least that
is
> > how I read the post.
> >
> > Vale
> > Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27620 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
Salve Cato,

You are overlooking one important point, the Pact that Roma made with
the Immortals in her early days was between the city of Rome and the
Gods, not between the empire she later ruled and the Gods.

While that pact was observed there was only one single instance of a
foreign army entering Roma's pomerium in over 11 centuries. After it
was abbandoned that was no longer the case, Roma was sacked by a
Barbarian King less than 20 years after Theodosius forced the Senate
to formally disolve Roma's ancient agreement with the Immortals, and
one foreign army after another has marched into Roma since then, the
most recent instance being just 60 years ago.

L. Sicinius Drusus
Pontifex

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato Gn. Iulio Caeso S.P.D.
>
> Salve, Caesar.
>
> I think that you are being generous. Both Vedius Germanicus and
> Sicinius Drusus have often mentioned this thread of "when
> Christianity took hold, everything was lost", but that is simply not
> accurate historically. Paganism lost. Rome continued for another
> 1000 years. The Byzantine Empire stood as the glittering centre of
> the world's civilizations for centuries, so even the social
> implications are incorrect. And everyone in the ancient world
> agreed that Rome continued --- until AD 1453.
>
> vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
> <gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
> > Salve, Cato.
> >
> > I think "won" was meant in a more general sense than just a
> military
> > one. "Lost" I would take to be lost all, Rome the city, Western
> > Empire, infrastructure...Roman "society" I suppose. Least that is
> > how I read the post.
> >
> > Vale
> > Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27621 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: RE Rome's defeats
In a message dated 8/14/04 9:15:01 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
mlcinnyc@... writes:

> Battle of the Allia River - 386 BC
> A large force of 70,000 Gauls defeats a half as large group of
> Romans sent to stop their march on Rome. The city is abandoned and
> the Celts sack it.


More like 390-89, The city wasn't completly abandoned. The Capitaline was
still manned. Juno's honking greese defeated a surprise attack, the Byrennus
negotiated with the remainder of the Senate a ransom, since Latin bands under
Roman leadership was causing problems. Had the Byrennus the upper hand, why
negotiate?
I'll remind you this whole war was started when the Romans defied an Etruscan
god declared truce.

>
> Battle of Vesuvius - 339 BC
> The rebellious Latins defeat Romans under P. Decius Mus
>

340 was the date. The Latins were better trained and had more troops.
Beside the Samnites and a stratagem defeated them the following day. This was
where
Manlius sent in his Accensci in the third line, while the Latins sent in
their Triarii.
When the Latin Triarii broke the Accensci, they now faced the Roman triarii
who broke them in turn. The Samnite lighter equipped warriors pursued the
heavier force, turning a rout into a slaughter.

> Defeat at the Claudine Forks - 321 BC
> As a result of Samnite tactics and the carelessness of the Roman
> consuls, the Roman army found itself trapped between two mountain
> passes at a place known as the Claudine Forks. They made hopeless
> attempts to scale the steep surrounding slopes before finally
> resigning themselves to suing for peace with the Samnites.
>

I don't think the Gods rewarded stupid Roman tactics. Besides who won the
final battle at the gate?

> Battle of Lautulae - 316 BC
> Romans are defeated by the Samnites.

See above

>
> Battle of Camerinum - 298 BC
> Samnites defeat the Romans under Lucius Cornelius Scipio in the
> first battle of the Third Samnite War.
>

See above

> Battle of Arretium - 285 BC
> A Roman army under Lucius Caecilius is destroyed by the Gauls.
>

Ambushed was a better word.

> Battle of Asculum - 279 BC
> Pyrrhus of Epirus meets the Roman army for the second time at
> Asculum. During the brutal fighting, Pyrrhus is wounded in the arm
> with a javelin. Using elephants and a strong phalanx, he succeeds in
> defeating the Romans for the second time. While he killed 6000
> Romans (twice as many as his own), Pyrrhus' losses are far more
> serious, since many of his officers were killed and he cannot
> recruit new troops. Origin of the term "Pyrrhic Victory".
>

Who eventually won?

> Battle of the Lipara Islands - 260 BC
> A Roman naval force is defeated by the Carthaginians.
>

Actually it was a draw.

> Battle of Drepana - 249 BC
> Carthaginians under Adherbal defeat the fleet of Roman admiral
> Claudius Pulcher.
>

After Claudius pitched the Sacred Chickens into the sea. I wouldn't go there
if I were
you.

> Battle of Telamon – 225 BC
> Rome reaps its revenge on the Celts, when 70,000 tribesmen from Cis-
> Alpine Gaul foray into central Italy. The Romans confront them and
> slaughter 40,000 at the Battle of Telamon. As a result the Po River
> Valley is conquered to ensure that the Celts of northern Italy do
> not threaten Rome again.
>

The Romans won Telamon.

> Battle of Lake Trasimene – 217 BC
> During the Second Punic War, Hannibal invades Italy, destroying a
> Roman army of roughly 25,000 on the shores of Lake Trasimene in one
> of the largest ambushes ever executed in war.
>

So, Flaminus was not to keen on march security. But again who will win?

> Battle of Cannae – 216 BC
> Desperate to stop Hannibal, Rome sends a massive army of 90,000 men.
> In what is probably the classic battle of all time, Hannibal
> completely surrounds the Roman army and annihilates it. It is the
> greatest defeat Rome ever suffers.
>
> Battle of Callicinus - 171 BC
> Perseus of Macedon defeats a Roman army under Publius Licinius
> Crassus.
>

If you think this was a defeat, you are reading a flawed history. Licinius
attacked
when he shouldn't have because was about to be replaced by the new Consul.
It was a check. The Roman army was not defeated, was not driven out of
Greece and the same army routed King Perseus's army at Pydna in 168.

> Battle of Arausio - 105 BC
> Cimbri inflict a major defeat on the Roman army of Mallius Maximus.
>

Arausio happened because two Consuls refused to cooperate with each other.

> Battle of Carrhae – 53 BC
> Crassus foolishly decides to invade Parthia in the east and due to
> his inept leadership 20,000 of his men are killed, including
> himself. Roughly 7000 horse archers, re-supplied with arrows carried
> in by camels during the battle, manage to defeat a Roman army of 7
> legions.
>

He was cursed by a Tribune before he left Rome.

> Battle of Teutoburg Forest – AD 9
> Three legions are destroyed by German forces on the far side of the
> Rhine in one of the bloodiest battles of the early 1st century AD.
>

There were no priests with this army. They started to the fortress earlier.
And had Varius not panicked, nothing much would have happened.


In every battle mentioned that Rome lost, Rome won the war. Who were the
gods looking out for?

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27622 From: Casta Meretrix Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Re: The Sacrifice Fund
< Because, animals have no rights.

Salve Sulla,

I'm going to take both sides of the fence here. I think that animals do have
rights-- the right to live as their species was meant to. For example, not
in a factory farming cage unable to stand or turn for their entire lives
only to be slaughtered and eaten when they are fat enough.

If a cow lives as a cow should his entire life- wandering around and
munching grass-- I don't see anything wrong with her eventually being
slaughtered and eaten. After all she would have had a good life. Animals
kill eachother regularly and don't apologize from being
carnivores/omnivores. The difference is that humans 'grow' these animals,
give them a horrible life and then kill them without respect sometimes only
to make a nice jacket while the meat is thrown away (or even more gross,
ground up and fed back to the animals that are too small to be slaughtered).
This is what most animal rights activists are really against but then they
get so disgusted and wound up that they don't want to see any animal
slaughtered ever... We as humans *know* at some level that factory farming
of animals is wrong. Just look at the most common science fiction movies
like 'V' where *the* most horrible nightmare scenario is that aliens come to
earth, lock humans in cages, tube feed them, and then transport them to
another planet in order to be the main meal (using that handy cookbook 'How
to Serve Man :-)

As for slaughtering animals for religious purposes: it would be against
religious freedom to tell anyone that they can't.

As for the wiccan 'an it harm none', I believe that was not written with
animals in mind since none of the mulitiple persons that have been
accredited (or accredit themselves) with creating the Wiccan Rede were
vegetarians and animal activism did not exist yet. It is a phrase that some
Wiccan (mostly US-ers) have coined and twisted to their own use. Either way,
that phrase and the forbidding of animal sacrifices have no place in the
Religio Romana.

And for the record, maybe once per month I eat something that had parents
but I don't presume to enforce my lifestyle and beliefs on other people.

Vale,
Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27623 From: Casta Meretrix Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Investment of Imperium
D. Octavia Aventina SPD

Salvete quirites,

As Lictor Curiatus of Nova Roma, I Diana Octavia Aventina hereby witness the
investment of Imperium upon Praetor Gaius Popollius Laenas in the consulship
of Gnaeus Salix Astur and Gnaeus Equitius Marinus.

Valete,

Diana Octavia Aventina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27624 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
G. Equitius Cato L. Sicinio Druso Gn. Iulio Caeso Q. Fabio Maximo
S.P.D.

Salvete, viri.

First, Caesar, the Byzantine Empire was absolutely and undeniably
considered *by the ancient world and by themselves* to be the Roman
Empire, whether we in the 28th century AUC like it or not. The
Eastern Emperors, until AD 1453, were crowned "Basileus
Romaoi", "Emperor of the Romans". This is not "a perspective", this
is an historical fact, and the only perspective valid is that of the
people who lived at the time. The Byzantines, and everyone in the
world who knew them, considered them to be the Roman Empire.

Second, every single date I showed, *except* the last (9 AD) falls
within the Republican period, Drusus. Every one. So I was
specifically showing dates that were not tainted by the imperial
period.

Third, Fabius Maximus, I see rationalizations. Interpretations.
Excuses. That's fine, but it is not going to change the fact,
historically, that during the time that Rome was dedicated to the
practice of the religio she was *not* simply triumphant over
everyone everywhere, as Vedius implied. She, like every nation
before and every nation since, won some, and lost some. This is
simple historical fact, and long detailed explanations of military
manoeuvres or the vagaries of weather or terrain or the size of the
opposing forces or the age of a specific general's horse are
irrelevant. Rome won a lot, she lost a lot. She won *more* than
she lost for a long time, both as a pagan State and as a Christian
one. To try to link military victory with the "rightness"
or "wrongness" of a specific religion is a very specious thing
indeed. To utter the logical conclusion of such an argument in
regards to the religio might be considered blasphemy, so I refuse to
do so here.

The religio can, and *must* stand for itself. To blame another
religion for the collapse of the Western Empire, in order to support
the religio, smacks of desperation, and is unnecessary.

valete,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "John Dobbins" <drusus@b...> wrote:
> Salve Cato,
>
> You are overlooking one important point, the Pact that Roma made
with
> the Immortals in her early days was between the city of Rome and
the
> Gods, not between the empire she later ruled and the Gods.
>
> While that pact was observed there was only one single instance of
a
> foreign army entering Roma's pomerium in over 11 centuries. After
it
> was abbandoned that was no longer the case, Roma was sacked by a
> Barbarian King less than 20 years after Theodosius forced the
Senate
> to formally disolve Roma's ancient agreement with the Immortals,
and
> one foreign army after another has marched into Roma since then,
the
> most recent instance being just 60 years ago.
>
> L. Sicinius Drusus
> Pontifex
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
<mlcinnyc@y...>
> wrote:
> > G. Equitius Cato Gn. Iulio Caeso S.P.D.
> >
> > Salve, Caesar.
> >
> > I think that you are being generous. Both Vedius Germanicus and
> > Sicinius Drusus have often mentioned this thread of "when
> > Christianity took hold, everything was lost", but that is simply
not
> > accurate historically. Paganism lost. Rome continued for
another
> > 1000 years. The Byzantine Empire stood as the glittering centre
of
> > the world's civilizations for centuries, so even the social
> > implications are incorrect. And everyone in the ancient world
> > agreed that Rome continued --- until AD 1453.
> >
> > vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
> > <gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
> > > Salve, Cato.
> > >
> > > I think "won" was meant in a more general sense than just a
> > military
> > > one. "Lost" I would take to be lost all, Rome the city,
Western
> > > Empire, infrastructure...Roman "society" I suppose. Least that
is
> > > how I read the post.
> > >
> > > Vale
> > > Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27625 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:

>
> Second, every single date I showed, *except* the last (9 AD) falls
> within the Republican period, Drusus. Every one. So I was
> specifically showing dates that were not tainted by the imperial
> period.
>

Ave Cato,

You are looking at maps with modern eyes and seeing something that the
Romans never saw. The Empire wasn't a modern nation state with Rome as
it's capital. It was a group of assorted governmental entitiess thet
were tied to the city of Roma via treaties and/or laws. Roma didn't
"own" much of the land in the Empire the land was held by the other
governmental entities that were Roma's clients. The modern term
"Empire" is used for this system, and it not only existed under the
later Republic, allmost all of it came under Roman domination during
the Republican period.

The Pact that was established between the Immortals and Roma was
between the CITY OF ROME and the Gods. At the time it was made that is
all there was. The Romans couldn't simply change it once they became
Patrons of the world. The Roman Rituals weren't held in every corner
of the Empire, the Clients of Roma continued to observe their own
rituals with their own Gods. The concept of Roman citizenship
established by Caracalla that made Romans out of everyone in the later
Empire couldn't change an aragement between the city and the Gods.

AS long as the city of Roma held to that agreement with the Immortals
the city was under their protection, no foreign soldiers crossed the
pomerium in 11 centuries save one instance, and in that single
exception the Romans had violated the pact with the Immortals by
violating a sacred treaty.

L. Sicinius Drusus
Pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27626 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Re: Investment of Imperium
Salvete quirites,

As Lictor Curiatus of Nova Roma, I, Lucius Sicinius Drusus, hereby
witness the investment of Imperium upon Praetor Gaius Popollius Laenas
in the consulship of Gnaeus Salix Astur and Gnaeus Equitius Marinus.

Valete,

L. Sicinius Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27627 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Re: RE Romes defeats
during the end of the west, why didnt the east muster
or rally to italias defense? wouldt constantine have
wanted that?
--- QFabiusMaxmi@... <QFabiusMaxmi@...> wrote:
> In a message dated 8/14/04 9:15:01 PM Pacific
Daylight Time,
> mlcinnyc@... writes:
>
> > Battle of the Allia River - 386 BC
> > A large force of 70,000 Gauls defeats a half as
large group of
> > Romans sent to stop their march on Rome. The city
is abandoned and
> > the Celts sack it.
>
>
> More like 390-89, The city wasn't completly
abandoned. The Capitaline was
>
> still manned. Juno's honking greese defeated a
surprise attack, the Byrenn
> us
> negotiated with the remainder of the Senate a
ransom, since Latin bands und
> er
> Roman leadership was causing problems. Had the
Byrennus the upper hand, wh
> y
> negotiate?
> I'll remind you this whole war was started when the
Romans defied an Etrusc
> an
> god declared truce.
>
> >
> > Battle of Vesuvius - 339 BC
> > The rebellious Latins defeat Romans under P.
Decius Mus
> >
>
> 340 was the date. The Latins were better trained
and had more troops.
> Beside the Samnites and a stratagem defeated them
the following day. This
> was
> where
> Manlius sent in his Accensci in the third line,
while the Latins sent in
> their Triarii.
> When the Latin Triarii broke the Accensci, they now
faced the Roman triarii
>
> who broke them in turn. The Samnite lighter
equipped warriors pursued the
>
> heavier force, turning a rout into a slaughter.

>
> > Defeat at the Claudine Forks - 321 BC
> > As a result of Samnite tactics and the
carelessness of the Roman
> > consuls, the Roman army found itself trapped
between two mountain
> > passes at a place known as the Claudine Forks.
They made hopeless
> > attempts to scale the steep surrounding slopes
before finally
> > resigning themselves to suing for peace with the
Samnites.
> >
>
> I don't think the Gods rewarded stupid Roman
tactics. Besides who won the
>
> final battle at the gate?
>
> > Battle of Lautulae - 316 BC
> > Romans are defeated by the Samnites.
>
> See above
>
> >
> > Battle of Camerinum - 298 BC
> > Samnites defeat the Romans under Lucius Cornelius
Scipio in the
> > first battle of the Third Samnite War.
> >
>
> See above
>
> > Battle of Arretium - 285 BC
> > A Roman army under Lucius Caecilius is destroyed
by the Gauls.
> >
>
> Ambushed was a better word.
>
> > Battle of Asculum - 279 BC
> > Pyrrhus of Epirus meets the Roman army for the
second time at
> > Asculum. During the brutal fighting, Pyrrhus is
wounded in the arm
> > with a javelin. Using elephants and a strong
phalanx, he succeeds in
> > defeating the Romans for the second time. While he
killed 6000
> > Romans (twice as many as his own), Pyrrhus' losses
are far more
> > serious, since many of his officers were killed
and he cannot
> > recruit new troops. Origin of the term "Pyrrhic
Victory".
> >
>
=== Message Truncated ===


=====
S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27628 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Re: RE Romes defeats
Salvete Quirites,

raymond fuentes wrote:
> during the end of the west, why didnt the east muster
> or rally to italias defense? wouldt constantine have
> wanted that?

The East was having its own problems with the Ostrogoths, who tore the
Eastern legions up at Adrianople in 378 CE.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27629 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Re: RE Romes defeats
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> during the end of the west, why didnt the east muster
> or rally to italias defense? wouldt constantine have
> wanted that?

When the West was falling apart there was a danger that a General sent
from the East would establish a power base and gain the title of
Western Emperor making himself a possible contender to the Emperor in
Constanople.

The Last Western Emperor Romulus Augustulus was a 14 year old puppet
for his father who had driven the Emporer, Nepos, recognized by
Constanople into exile. Nepos was still alive and claiming the
Imperial power.

Odovacar may have been a Barbarian, but that didn't mean he was a
fool. He knew there was no chance that he would ever be recognized by
Constanople as the Western Emperor. He Killed the Emperor's father,
Orestes, and disposed the puppet Emperor Augustulus, but kept him
alive. Rather than installing another puppet he sent the Imperial
Regalia to Constanople with a letter of resignation from Romulus
Augustulus, and a message that the Empire only needed a single Emperor
and that he would Hold Italy for the Empire. In theory Odovacar was
reuniting the remanants of the Western Empire with the East. In fact
he was insuring that the Emperor in Constanople would never have to
worry about being challenged by an Emperor from Roma. Both parts of
this arrangement were acceptable to Constanople.

L. Sicinius Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27630 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
In a message dated 8/15/04 5:20:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
mlcinnyc@... writes:

Third, Fabius Maximus, I see rationalizations. Interpretations.
Excuses.

I see that you are the most short sighted man in the world.
Every example you proposed was an eventual Roman victory, even after
Tuetoburger
the Germans became dominated by the Romans, even though they were never
formally
occupied. The Romans simply won.

That's fine, but it is not going to change the fact,
historically, that during the time that Rome was dedicated to the
practice of the religio she was *not* simply triumphant over
everyone everywhere, as Vedius implied.
I think Vedius never implied that. I think you assumed that he implied.
Roman had military success for over 1500 years. It was only after their Gods
became personal, the national army became non Roman, that they declined.
How long the British Empire with all its constant technological advances
last?


She, like every nation
before and every nation since, won some, and lost some. This is
simple historical fact, and long detailed explanations of military
manoeuvres or the vagaries of weather or terrain or the size of the
opposing forces or the age of a specific general's horse are
irrelevant. Rome won a lot, she lost a lot. She won *more* than
she lost for a long time, both as a pagan State and as a Christian
one. To try to link military victory with the "rightness"
or "wrongness" of a specific religion is a very specious thing
indeed. To utter the logical conclusion of such an argument in
regards to the religio might be considered blasphemy, so I refuse to
do so here.




And this tells me that you are missing a very important point in Romanatias.
Stop trying to rationalize using science. It's not working.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27631 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [[ReligioRomana]
In a message dated 8/15/04 5:20:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
mlcinnyc@... writes:

First, Caesar, the Byzantine Empire was absolutely and undeniably
considered *by the ancient world and by themselves* to be the Roman
Empire, whether we in the 28th century AUC like it or not.


True. What's your point? It was a continuation of the Dominate. And we
Byzantinists consider the distruction of the Army at Manzikert to be the end of
the Roman military connection with the Greeks. Also many Lombard kings
considered themselves to be discendants of the Romans.

As for Constantinople, its fall to the Crusaders, in the fourth Crusade
finished whatever Roman linkage it had. All the Roman artifacts and symbols were
looted. When the Empire reconstituted it was completly Hellanized.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27632 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Re: RE Romes defeats
In a message dated 8/15/04 7:31:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
praefectus2324@... writes:

during the end of the west, why didnt the east muster
or rally to italias defense? wouldt constantine have
wanted that?



Actually they did. The closest that the East could have saved the West, was
the large campaign of the Eastern Empire planned against Africa and the
Vandals. Arianism saved the Vandals, since so many Germans in both armies were
practitioners, and only fought half-heartly against each other.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27633 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Investment of Imperium
L Equitius Cincinnatus Augur quiritibus salutem dicit
Salvete, Quirites.

I, Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus Augur, Lictor Curiatus Novae Romae, hereby witness the investment of Gaius Popollius Laenas with the imperium praetoris in the consulship of Cn. Salix Astur and Gn. Equitius Marinus.

I also acknowledge and witness.
the ascension to priesthood of Flavius Galerius Aurelianus (Flamen Cerealis),
Lucia Modia Lupa (Sacerdos Aedis Dianae),
and Agrippina Modia Aurelia (Sacerdos Aedis Necessitatis).

Di Immortales, vos bonas preces precor ut istum praetorem recte ducatis.

Valete
L Equi Cinc Augur
Lictor Curiatus, Flamen Martialis, Pontifex,
Senator Consularis, Paterfamilias Equitii;
Censor, Praetor emeritus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27634 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
G.Equitius Cato Q. Fabio Maxino S.P.D.

Salve Fabius Maximus.

And *we* Byzantinists recognize no such interruption in the imperial
power, nor its dissolution either during or after the
Fourth "Crusade". The emperors were still crowned Basileus Romaoi
and considered themselves the only true heir to the Roman Empire.
That is why there was such consternation over Lombard claims to the
imperial dignity, supported by the bishops of Rome even before the
final Schism between East and West.

Fabius Maximus, Vedius Germanicus said that as long as Rome was true
to the religio, she won. There was no hint of question or
qualification. I took him at his word, not some implied idea:

"Just because that downfall took longer to hit the east than it did
the west, is irrelevant. When they honored Iuppiter Optimus Maximus,
Rome won. When they turned to the worship of Jehovah of Sinai, Rome
lost. You do the math.

Vale,

Flavius Vedius Germanicus
Pater Patriae"



That claim is simply historically wrong. Your insistence that the
advent of Christianity was the great sword which cut down Rome's
greatness is also simply historically wrong. Roman power in the world
continued to hold sway for another 1000 years; if not necessarily
militarily, then in the minds and hearts of mankind, which is almost
as potent a force. You wrote:

"And this tells me that you are missing a very important point in
Romanatias [sic]. Stop trying to rationalize using science. It's not
working."

in response to my saying that using military victories or defeats to
support or attack the validity of a set of religious beliefs is
ridiculous. I'm not "rationalizing" anything, Fabius Maximus --- you
are. It's simply impossible to try to "prove" a religion based on
military power. This is not a question of "Romanitas" either,
although that's an interesting red herring to toss out. It's a
matter of simple historical fact.

Let the religio stand on its own. It doesn't need to "prove" itself
against Christianity to be valid for its practitioners. Trying to do
so will only lead to disappointment and argument.

vale,

Cato






--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@a... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 8/15/04 5:20:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> mlcinnyc@y... writes:
>
> First, Caesar, the Byzantine Empire was absolutely and undeniably
> considered *by the ancient world and by themselves* to be the
Roman
> Empire, whether we in the 28th century AUC like it or not.
>
>
> True. What's your point? It was a continuation of the Dominate.
And we
> Byzantinists consider the distruction of the Army at Manzikert to
be the end of
> the Roman military connection with the Greeks. Also many Lombard
kings
> considered themselves to be discendants of the Romans.
>
> As for Constantinople, its fall to the Crusaders, in the fourth
Crusade
> finished whatever Roman linkage it had. All the Roman artifacts
and symbols were
> looted. When the Empire reconstituted it was completly
Hellanized.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27635 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
> G.Equitius Cato Q. Fabio Maxino S.P.D.
>
> Salve Fabius Maximus.
>
> And *we* Byzantinists recognize no such interruption in the imperial
> power, nor its dissolution either during or after the
> Fourth "Crusade". The emperors were still crowned Basileus Romaoi
> and considered themselves the only true heir to the Roman Empire.
> That is why there was such consternation over Lombard claims to the
> imperial dignity, supported by the bishops of Rome even before the
> final Schism between East and West.

After 1453 the Czars of Russia considered themselves to be the heirs
of Constanople and Moscow to be the third Rome, but that didn't make
it so.

I Look on the Byzanthian Empire as "Rome II, the Sequel", and like
most sequels it just wasn't as good as the original. ;-)

Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27636 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Salve, Cato.

Rome lived on in the hearts and minds of who? Take Britain for
example. The infrastructure was shattered by the invasions of the
Angles, the Saxons, and then the Danes. The Romano-British heritage
lived in scattered settlements in Wales. To the vast majority of
Britons, Rome was a memory and it had absolutely no relevance to
their daily life, a life punctuated by frequent raids, skirmishes and
set battles. Romano-British culture was quickly snuffed out and
replaced by a Saxon "mos maiorum" which itself was altered (not
eradicated) at Senlac Hill in 1066.

If Roman life and history - indeed the learning of the ancients as a
whole - had a relevance it was to a select minority of academics.
Much of that knowledge was then either lost or subsequently
suppressed as heresy by the church. People got tortured and burnt at
the stake for espousing knowledge that had once been common place.

If you mean Rome lived on in Byzantium, it may have done as a memory
and heritage. It did not live on in the sense that Roman society had
just picked up its bags and transplanted itself "whole" to the east.

As for beliefs, well they are all relative to the situation as has
been pointed out. I can believe I am the Shah of Persia or the Mogul
Emperor, but am I? Only if I am generally accepted as such. Byzantium
was not Rome. It was very eastern/greek in structure, dress, thought
etc.

Rome died in Rome.

Vale
Caesar


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
> G.Equitius Cato Q. Fabio Maxino S.P.D.
>
> Salve Fabius Maximus.
>
> And *we* Byzantinists recognize no such interruption in the
imperial
> power, nor its dissolution either during or after the
> Fourth "Crusade". The emperors were still crowned Basileus Romaoi
> and considered themselves the only true heir to the Roman Empire.
> That is why there was such consternation over Lombard claims to the
> imperial dignity, supported by the bishops of Rome even before the
> final Schism between East and West.
>
> Fabius Maximus, Vedius Germanicus said that as long as Rome was
true
> to the religio, she won. There was no hint of question or
> qualification. I took him at his word, not some implied idea:
>
> "Just because that downfall took longer to hit the east than it did
> the west, is irrelevant. When they honored Iuppiter Optimus
Maximus,
> Rome won. When they turned to the worship of Jehovah of Sinai, Rome
> lost. You do the math.
>
> Vale,
>
> Flavius Vedius Germanicus
> Pater Patriae"
>
>
>
> That claim is simply historically wrong. Your insistence that the
> advent of Christianity was the great sword which cut down Rome's
> greatness is also simply historically wrong. Roman power in the
world
> continued to hold sway for another 1000 years; if not necessarily
> militarily, then in the minds and hearts of mankind, which is
almost
> as potent a force. You wrote:
>
> "And this tells me that you are missing a very important point in
> Romanatias [sic]. Stop trying to rationalize using science. It's
not
> working."
>
> in response to my saying that using military victories or defeats
to
> support or attack the validity of a set of religious beliefs is
> ridiculous. I'm not "rationalizing" anything, Fabius Maximus ---
you
> are. It's simply impossible to try to "prove" a religion based on
> military power. This is not a question of "Romanitas" either,
> although that's an interesting red herring to toss out. It's a
> matter of simple historical fact.
>
> Let the religio stand on its own. It doesn't need to "prove"
itself
> against Christianity to be valid for its practitioners. Trying to
do
> so will only lead to disappointment and argument.
>
> vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@a... wrote:
> >
> > In a message dated 8/15/04 5:20:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> > mlcinnyc@y... writes:
> >
> > First, Caesar, the Byzantine Empire was absolutely and
undeniably
> > considered *by the ancient world and by themselves* to be the
> Roman
> > Empire, whether we in the 28th century AUC like it or not.
> >
> >
> > True. What's your point? It was a continuation of the
Dominate.
> And we
> > Byzantinists consider the distruction of the Army at Manzikert to
> be the end of
> > the Roman military connection with the Greeks. Also many
Lombard
> kings
> > considered themselves to be discendants of the Romans.
> >
> > As for Constantinople, its fall to the Crusaders, in the fourth
> Crusade
> > finished whatever Roman linkage it had. All the Roman artifacts
> and symbols were
> > looted. When the Empire reconstituted it was completly
> Hellanized.
> >
> > Q. Fabius Maximus
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27637 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
G. Equitius Cato Gn. iulio Caeso S.P.D.

Salve, Iulius Caesar.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
<gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
> Salve, Cato.
>
> Rome lived on in the hearts and minds of who? > If you mean Rome
lived on in Byzantium, it may have done as a memory
> and heritage. It did not live on in the sense that Roman society
had
> just picked up its bags and transplanted itself "whole" to the
east.


CATO: Actually, that's exactly what it *did* do. The court followed
the emperor. When there was an emperor in the West, he usually hung
out in Ravenna; in the East, it was Constantinople. The imperial
court did in fact, pick itself up and move to Constantinople once St.
Constantine I had settled himself there.


>
> As for beliefs, well they are all relative to the situation as has
> been pointed out. I can believe I am the Shah of Persia or the
Mogul
> Emperor, but am I? Only if I am generally accepted as such.
Byzantium
> was not Rome.

CATO: The point I have been making (repeatedly) is that the
Byzantines *were accepted as the Roman Empire* by everybody on earth
at the time. All of Europe, Asia, Africa, everyone recognized the
emperors of Byzantium as the Roman Emperors. they didn't simply
style themselves that way, as the Russians did after the Fall of
Constantinople.


> Rome died in Rome.

CATO: Not according to history. And besides, O Caesar, are *we* not
the living revivification of Rome? :-) For Drusus: "Rome III:
Darkness in the Senate House" :-D


>
> Vale
> Caesar


vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27638 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Salve, Cato.

My point exactly. Small minorities followed to the east. An attempt
to intice the old senatorial families (old by the standards of the
time) to the east failed dismally. Flunkies followed, as flunkies
must else become unemployed. The rank and file Romans stayed put.

As for what the rest of the world thought of Byzantium, they thought
what the Byzantines could enforce. With the decline of Byzantine
military power whether nations accorded the Emperor the politeness
of terming him Roman is, just that - politeness.

If in 500 years my ancestors still call themselves British but live
in Canada, a Canada that in all liklihood will have long since
severed its remaining links with the UK, are they British? Even if
their neighbours call them British are they? They don't live in
Britain, they will have assimilated Canadian and American customs
and attitudes. They will not, I contend be British, whatever they or
their neighbours think or say.

I will be the last Brit of my line that endures (hopefully) in
Canada.

As to what we are here - well that links to sovereignty and
nationhood. If we say we are the inheritors of Rome, are we just
because we say we are? We can think and believe we are, but what
does the rest of the world think? Even if a majority accepted our
claim, would we be by just thinking it? That in turns links to all
the issues that beset us here in NR. There are a lot of attitudes at
work that are not Roman, a lot of suggested policies, laws, etc.
That is analagous to the Byzantines, calling themselves Roman, but
not thinking or acting (or worshipping) as Romans of antiquity.

Rome died in Rome. It will only truly be reborn here if the Mos
Maiorum is followed rigidly by the state and the vast majority of
the citizens of Nova Roma. If that does not happen, then NR will
remain an image (and a very fuzzy one at that) of Rome of antiquity.

It will be a ghost of RA with a personality disorder.

Vale
Caesar


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
<mlcinnyc@y...> wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato Gn. iulio Caeso S.P.D.
>
> Salve, Iulius Caesar.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
> <gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
> > Salve, Cato.
> >
> > Rome lived on in the hearts and minds of who? > If you mean Rome
> lived on in Byzantium, it may have done as a memory
> > and heritage. It did not live on in the sense that Roman society
> had
> > just picked up its bags and transplanted itself "whole" to the
> east.
>
>
> CATO: Actually, that's exactly what it *did* do. The court
followed
> the emperor. When there was an emperor in the West, he usually
hung
> out in Ravenna; in the East, it was Constantinople. The imperial
> court did in fact, pick itself up and move to Constantinople once
St.
> Constantine I had settled himself there.
>
>
> >
> > As for beliefs, well they are all relative to the situation as
has
> > been pointed out. I can believe I am the Shah of Persia or the
> Mogul
> > Emperor, but am I? Only if I am generally accepted as such.
> Byzantium
> > was not Rome.
>
> CATO: The point I have been making (repeatedly) is that the
> Byzantines *were accepted as the Roman Empire* by everybody on
earth
> at the time. All of Europe, Asia, Africa, everyone recognized the
> emperors of Byzantium as the Roman Emperors. they didn't simply
> style themselves that way, as the Russians did after the Fall of
> Constantinople.
>
>
> > Rome died in Rome.
>
> CATO: Not according to history. And besides, O Caesar, are *we*
not
> the living revivification of Rome? :-) For Drusus: "Rome III:
> Darkness in the Senate House" :-D
>
>
> >
> > Vale
> > Caesar
>
>
> vale,
>
> Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27639 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
O.S.D. G. Equitius Cato

Salvete, omnes et singulator Gn. Iulio Caeso.

Caesar,

I understand precisely the point you are making in re: your family,
Canada, and Great Britain.

However. The Byzantines did *not* think they were Roman in a world
that thought they were something else. The world in which Byzantium
existed accepted them as the Roman Empire. And as far as the
Byzantines calling themselves Roman but not acting, etc., as
Romans "in antiquity"...ummmm...well, the Byzantines got their start
in AD 330 with the founding of Constantinople. I don't know how old
you are, but to *me*, I'd consider that "antiquity" :-) We are
farther away from them by several centuries than they were from the
founding of the City; I'd say they knew better than we do what being
a Roman was.

I see where you're going with the "attitudes", "fuzzy" thinking, "Mos
Maiorum followed rigidly" stuff, and as usual, we will have to calmly
disagree. Boni politico-speak!

Part of what made the Romans of antiquity great was their ability to
ingest and syncretize new thinking; winnowing out what was patently
non-Roman and clumping the rest on as accretions to their thought
processes, always presented as either logically extending from
already-held beliefs or simply as clever re-writing of old ones. I
will grant you that *great* care must be taken in that ingestion and
winnowing process; but I think it folly to deny the process
altogether.

vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
<gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
> Salve, Cato.
>
> My point exactly. Small minorities followed to the east. An attempt
> to intice the old senatorial families (old by the standards of the
> time) to the east failed dismally. Flunkies followed, as flunkies
> must else become unemployed. The rank and file Romans stayed put.
>
> As for what the rest of the world thought of Byzantium, they
thought
> what the Byzantines could enforce. With the decline of Byzantine
> military power whether nations accorded the Emperor the politeness
> of terming him Roman is, just that - politeness.
>
> If in 500 years my ancestors still call themselves British but live
> in Canada, a Canada that in all liklihood will have long since
> severed its remaining links with the UK, are they British? Even if
> their neighbours call them British are they? They don't live in
> Britain, they will have assimilated Canadian and American customs
> and attitudes. They will not, I contend be British, whatever they
or
> their neighbours think or say.
>
> I will be the last Brit of my line that endures (hopefully) in
> Canada.
>
> As to what we are here - well that links to sovereignty and
> nationhood. If we say we are the inheritors of Rome, are we just
> because we say we are? We can think and believe we are, but what
> does the rest of the world think? Even if a majority accepted our
> claim, would we be by just thinking it? That in turns links to all
> the issues that beset us here in NR. There are a lot of attitudes
at
> work that are not Roman, a lot of suggested policies, laws, etc.
> That is analagous to the Byzantines, calling themselves Roman, but
> not thinking or acting (or worshipping) as Romans of antiquity.
>
> Rome died in Rome. It will only truly be reborn here if the Mos
> Maiorum is followed rigidly by the state and the vast majority of
> the citizens of Nova Roma. If that does not happen, then NR will
> remain an image (and a very fuzzy one at that) of Rome of antiquity.
>
> It will be a ghost of RA with a personality disorder.
>
> Vale
> Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27640 From: Pompeius Minius Aquila Palladius Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: IUSIURANDUM - Scriba Propraetoris P. Minius Aquila Palladius
IUSIURANDUM

Pro lege Iunia 19 october 2752 a.u.c. de iusiurando,

Pro edicto III 10 quintilis 2757 a.u.c. Propraetore Galliae Lucio
Rutilio Minervale, de Galliae praefectura,

Pro edicto V 3 sextilis 2757 a.u.c. Propraetore Galliae Lucio
Rutilio Minervale, de interpretatoriae curiae creatione

Pro edicto IX 15 sextilis 2757 a.u.c. Propraetore Galliae Lucio
Rutilio Minervale, de designatione proprie Pompeio Minio Aquila
Palladio Scriba Propraetoris,

Ego, Pompeius Minius Aquila Palladius (Nathanaël Mini), hoc ipso
facto sollemniter iuro Novae Romae decus defendere et semper pro
Novae Romae Populo atque Senatu agere.

Ut Novae Romae magistratus ego, Pompeius Minius Aquila Palladius
(Nathanaël Mini), Romae deos deasque colere iuro in omnibus publicae
vitae temporibus atque Romanas virtutes et ublica et privata vita
persequi.

Ego, Pompeius Minius Aquila Palladius (Nathanaël Mini), Romanam
religionem favere et defendere iuro ut Novae Romae Reipublicae
religionem et numquam agere ita ut eius status publicae religionis
aliquid detrimenti capiat.

Praeterea ego, Pompeius Minius Aquila Palladius (Nathanaël Mini),
iuro quam optime fungi officium muneris Scribae Propraetoris meum
Novae Romae civis honore et coram Populi Romani deis atque deabus et
eorum voluntate et favore, munus Scribae Propraetoris accipio, una
cum iuribus, privilegiis, munera atque officia quae meum munus
comportat.



OATH

Whereas this oath is issued for purposes corresponding to the
purposes of :

- Oath Iunia act 19 october 2752 a.u.c.,

- Gallia Propraetor Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Edict number 3, 10
july 2757 a.u.c. about administration of Gallia province,

- Gallia Propraetor Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Edict number 5, 3
august 2757 a.u.c. creating an Translation Department (Curia),

- Gallia Propraetor Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Edict number 9, 15
august 2757 a.u.c. appointing notably Pompeius Minius Aquila
Palladius as a Scriba Propraetoris,

I, Pompeius Minius Aquila Palladius (Nathanaël Mini), do hereby
solemnly swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always
in the best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Pompeius Minius Aquila Palladius
(Nathanaël Mini), swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in
my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and
private life.

I, Pompeius Minius Aquila Palladius (Nathanaël Mini), swear to
uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova
Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status
as the State Religion.

I, Pompeius Minius Aquila Palladius (Nathanaël Mini), swear to
protect and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Pompeius Minius Aquila Palladius (Nathanaël Mini), further swear
to fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of
Scriba Propraetoris to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the
Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor,
do I accept the position of Scriba Propraetoris and all the rights,
privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.





PRESTATION DE SERMENT

Vu la loi Iunia du 19 octobre 2752 a.u.c. sur la prestation de
serment,

Vu l'édit III du 10 juillet 2757 a.u.c. par le Propréteur de Gaule
Lucius Rutilius Minervalis sur l'administration de Gallia,

Vu l'édit V du 3 août 2757 a.u.c. par le Propréteur de Gaule Lucius
Rutilius Minervalis instituant une Curie Interprétariale,

Vu l'édit IX du 15 août 2757 a.u.c. par le Propréteur de Gaule
Lucius Rutilius Minervalis désignant notamment Pompeius Minius
Aquila Palladius comme Scriba Propraetoris,



Moi, Pompeius Minius Aquila Palladius (Nathanaël Mini), jure
solennellement par la présente de soutenir l'honneur de Nova Roma en
toutes circonstances au mieux des intérêts du peuple et du Sénat de
Nova Roma.

En tant que magistrat de Nova Roma, moi, Pompeius Minius Aquila
Palladius (Nathanaël Mini), jure d'honorer les Dieux et Déesses de
Rome dans mes relations publiques et de poursuivre les Vertus
Romaines dans ma vie publique et privée.

Moi, Pompeius Minius Aquila Palladius (Nathanaël Mini), jure de
soutenir et défendre la Religio Romana comme la Religion d'Etat de
Nova Roma et jure de ne jamais agir d'une manière qui menace son
statut de Religion d'Etat.

Moi, Pompeius Minius Aquila Palladius (Nathanaël Mini), jure de
protéger et de défendre la Constitution de Nova Roma.

Moi, Pompeius Minius Aquila Palladius (Nathanaël Mini), jure de plus
de remplir au mieux de mes capacités les obligations et
responsabilités de la fonction de Scribe proprétorien.

Sur mon honneur en tant que citoyen de Nova Roma, en présence des
Dieux et Déesses du peuple romain et par leur faveur et leur bon
vouloir, j'accepte formellement d'assurer la fonction de Scribe
proprétorien et tous les droits, privilèges, obligations et
responsabilités qui s'y rattachent.



Scr. Carcaso, Gallia, XVIII Kal. SEPTEMBRES MMDCCLVII AUC.

_________________
POMPEIUS MINIUS AQUILA PALLADIUS
Praefectus Conscriptionis et Editionis
Curator Differium Galliae Provinciae
Scriba Curatoris Interpretum
Civis Galliae Provinciae
Civis Plebiae Novae Romae, Optima Maxima
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27641 From: Ocellina Minia Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Iusiurandum - Scriba Propraetoris Aelia Minia Ocellina Marocia
IUSIURANDUM

Pro lege Iunia 19 october 2752 a.u.c. de iusiurando,

Pro edicto III 10 quintilis 2757 a.u.c. Propraetore Galliae Lucio
Rutilio Minervale, de Galliae praefectura,

Pro edicto V 3 sextilis 2757 a.u.c. Propraetore Galliae Lucio
Rutilio Minervale, de interpretatoriae curiae creatione

Pro edicto IX 15 sextilis 2757 a.u.c. Propraetore Galliae Lucio
Rutilio Minervale, de designatione proprie Aeliae Miniae Ocellinae
Marociae Scriba Propraetoris,

Ego, Aelia Minia Ocellina Marocia (Najat Kharroba Mini), hoc ipso
facto sollemniter iuro Novae Romae decus defendere et semper pro
Novae Romae Populo atque Senatu agere.

Ut Novae Romae magistratus ego, Aelia Minia Ocellina Marocia (Najat
Kharroba Mini), Romae deos deasque colere iuro in omnibus publicae
vitae temporibus atque Romanas virtutes et ublica et privata vita
persequi.

Ego, Aelia Minia Ocellina Marocia (Najat Kharroba Mini), Romanam
religionem favere et defendere iuro ut Novae Romae Reipublicae
religionem et numquam agere ita ut eius status publicae religionis
aliquid detrimenti capiat.

Praeterea ego, Aelia Minia Ocellina Marocia (Najat Kharroba Mini),
iuro quam optime fungi officium muneris Scribae Propraetoris meum
Novae Romae civis honore et coram Populi Romani deis atque deabus et
eorum voluntate et favore, munus Scribae Propraetoris accipio, una
cum iuribus, privilegiis, munera atque officia quae meum munus
comportat.



OATH

Whereas this oath is issued for purposes corresponding to the
purposes of :

- Oath Iunia act 19 october 2752 a.u.c.,

- Gallia Propraetor Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Edict number 3, 10
july 2757 a.u.c. about administration of Gallia province,

- Gallia Propraetor Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Edict number 5, 3
august 2757 a.u.c. creating an Translation Department (Curia),

- Gallia Propraetor Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Edict number 9, 15
august 2757 a.u.c. appointing notably Aelia Minia Ocellina Marocia
as a Scriba Propraetoris,

I, Aelia Minia Ocellina Marocia (Najat Kharroba Mini), do hereby
solemnly swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always
in the best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Aelia Minia Ocellina Marocia (Najat
Kharroba Mini), swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my
public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and
private life.

I, Aelia Minia Ocellina Marocia (Najat Kharroba Mini), swear to
uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova
Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status
as the State Religion.

I, Aelia Minia Ocellina Marocia (Najat Kharroba Mini), swear to
protect and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Aelia Minia Ocellina Marocia (Najat Kharroba Mini), further swear
to fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of
Scriba Propraetoris to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the
Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor,
do I accept the position of Scriba Propraetoris and all the rights,
privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.





PRESTATION DE SERMENT

Vu la loi Iunia du 19 octobre 2752 a.u.c. sur la prestation de
serment,

Vu l'édit III du 10 juillet 2757 a.u.c. par le Propréteur de Gaule
Lucius Rutilius Minervalis sur l'administration de Gallia,

Vu l'édit V du 3 août 2757 a.u.c. par le Propréteur de Gaule Lucius
Rutilius Minervalis instituant une Curie Interprétariale,

Vu l'édit IX du 15 août 2757 a.u.c. par le Propréteur de Gaule
Lucius Rutilius Minervalis désignant notamment Aelia Minia Ocellina
Marocia comme Scriba Propraetoris,



Moi, Aelia Minia Ocellina Marocia (Najat Kharroba Mini), jure
solennellement par la présente de soutenir l'honneur de Nova Roma en
toutes circonstances au mieux des intérêts du peuple et du Sénat de
Nova Roma.

En tant que magistrat de Nova Roma, moi, Aelia Minia Ocellina
Marocia (Najat Kharroba Mini), jure d'honorer les Dieux et Déesses
de Rome dans mes relations publiques et de poursuivre les Vertus
Romaines dans ma vie publique et privée.

Moi, Aelia Minia Ocellina Marocia (Najat Kharroba Mini), jure de
soutenir et défendre la Religio Romana comme la Religion d'Etat de
Nova Roma et jure de ne jamais agir d'une manière qui menace son
statut de Religion d'Etat.

Moi, Aelia Minia Ocellina Marocia (Najat Kharroba Mini), jure de
protéger et de défendre la Constitution de Nova Roma.

Moi, Aelia Minia Ocellina Marocia (Najat Kharroba Mini), jure de
plus de remplir au mieux de mes capacités les obligations et
responsabilités de la fonction de Scribe proprétorien.

Sur mon honneur en tant que citoyenne de Nova Roma, en présence des
Dieux et Déesses du peuple romain et par leur faveur et leur bon
vouloir, j'accepte formellement d'assurer la fonction de Scribe
proprétorienne et tous les droits, privilèges, obligations et
responsabilités qui s'y rattachent.



Scr. Palladia Tolosa, Gallia, XVIII Kal. SEPTEMBRES MMDCCLVII AUC.

_________________
AELIA MINIA OCELLINA MAROCIA
Scriba Curatoris Interpretum
Civis Gentis Minia
Civis Galliae Provinciae
Civis Plebiae Novae Romae, Optima Maxima
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27642 From: Messalina Minia Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Iusiurandum - Scriba Propraetoris Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina
IUSIURANDUM

Pro lege Iunia 19 october 2752 a.u.c. de iusiurando,

Pro edicto III 10 quintilis 2757 a.u.c. Propraetore Galliae Lucio
Rutilio Minervale, de Galliae praefectura,

Pro edicto V 3 sextilis 2757 a.u.c. Propraetore Galliae Lucio
Rutilio Minervale, de interpretatoriae curiae creatione

Pro edicto IX 15 sextilis 2757 a.u.c. Propraetore Galliae Lucio
Rutilio Minervale, de designatione proprie Priscae Miniae Pompeiae
Messalinae Scriba Propraetoris,

Ego, Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina (Cristiana Mini), hoc ipso facto
sollemniter iuro Novae Romae decus defendere et semper pro Novae
Romae Populo atque Senatu agere.

Ut Novae Romae magistratus ego, Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina
(Cristiana Mini), Romae deos deasque colere iuro in omnibus publicae
vitae temporibus atque Romanas virtutes et ublica et privata vita
persequi.

Ego, Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina (Cristiana Mini), Romanam
religionem favere et defendere iuro ut Novae Romae Reipublicae
religionem et numquam agere ita ut eius status publicae religionis
aliquid detrimenti capiat.

Praeterea ego, Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina (Cristiana Mini), iuro
quam optime fungi officium muneris Scribae Propraetoris meum Novae
Romae civis honore et coram Populi Romani deis atque deabus et eorum
voluntate et favore, munus Scribae Propraetoris accipio, una cum
iuribus, privilegiis, munera atque officia quae meum munus
comportat.



OATH

Whereas this oath is issued for purposes corresponding to the
purposes of :

- Oath Iunia act 19 october 2752 a.u.c.,

- Gallia Propraetor Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Edict number 3, 10
july 2757 a.u.c. about administration of Gallia province,

- Gallia Propraetor Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Edict number 5, 3
august 2757 a.u.c. creating an Translation Department (Curia),

- Gallia Propraetor Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Edict number 9, 15
august 2757 a.u.c. appointing notably Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina
as a Scriba Propraetoris,

I, Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina (Cristiana Mini), do hereby
solemnly swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always
in the best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina
(Cristiana Mini), swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in
my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and
private life.

I, Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina (Cristiana Mini), swear to uphold
and defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and
swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as the
State Religion.

I, Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina (Cristiana Mini), swear to protect
and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina (Cristiana Mini), further swear to
fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of Scriba
Propraetoris to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the
Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor,
do I accept the position of Scriba Propraetoris and all the rights,
privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.





PRESTATION DE SERMENT

Vu la loi Iunia du 19 octobre 2752 a.u.c. sur la prestation de
serment,

Vu l'édit III du 10 juillet 2757 a.u.c. par le Propréteur de Gaule
Lucius Rutilius Minervalis sur l'administration de Gallia,

Vu l'édit V du 3 août 2757 a.u.c. par le Propréteur de Gaule Lucius
Rutilius Minervalis instituant une Curie Interprétariale,

Vu l'édit IX du 15 août 2757 a.u.c. par le Propréteur de Gaule
Lucius Rutilius Minervalis désignant notamment Prisca Minia Pompeia
Messalina comme Scriba Propraetoris,



Moi, Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina (Cristiana Mini), jure
solennellement par la présente de soutenir l'honneur de Nova Roma en
toutes circonstances au mieux des intérêts du peuple et du Sénat de
Nova Roma.

En tant que magistrat de Nova Roma, moi, Prisca Minia Pompeia
Messalina (Cristiana Mini), jure d'honorer les Dieux et Déesses de
Rome dans mes relations publiques et de poursuivre les Vertus
Romaines dans ma vie publique et privée.

Moi, Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina (Cristiana Mini), jure de
soutenir et défendre la Religio Romana comme la Religion d'Etat de
Nova Roma et jure de ne jamais agir d'une manière qui menace son
statut de Religion d'Etat.

Moi, Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina (Cristiana Mini), jure de
protéger et de défendre la Constitution de Nova Roma.

Moi, Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina (Cristiana Mini), jure de plus
de remplir au mieux de mes capacités les obligations et
responsabilités de la fonction de Scribe proprétorien.

Sur mon honneur en tant que citoyenne de Nova Roma, en présence des
Dieux et Déesses du peuple romain et par leur faveur et leur bon
vouloir, j'accepte formellement d'assurer la fonction de Scribe
proprétorienne et tous les droits, privilèges, obligations et
responsabilités qui s'y rattachent.



Scr. Aginno, Gallia, XVIII Kal. SEPTEMBRES MMDCCLVII AUC.

_________________
PRISCA MINIA POMPEIA MESSALINA
Scriba Curatoris Interpretum
Civis Gentis Minia
Civis Galliae Provinciae
Civis Plebiae Novae Romae, Optima Maxima
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27643 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Salve Cato;
very well said. This stulta has taken so long to remember that the
Arabs called the Byzantium; Al Rum ...yes Roma, and many in the West
had that appellation, even the famous Turkish Poet Rumi, supposedly
for a Christian mother I believe.
And talking about syncretization, just think of the Christian West
and all the wisdom that they received from the great Muslim empires:
Algebra, astronomy (Altair the star is an arabic word), Alcohol, all
kinds of medicine knowledge...which we today think of exclusively
as "Western"..
Rome never existed in a vacuum...its religio borrowed from Greece
and Magna Mater came from Turkey, syncretization was the basis of its
greatness, that a man from Egypt, England, France, Spain Libya,
Italy, Greece, Germany,Syria, Israel, Algeria. Turkey all could
say "I am a Roman"
too often we forget this,
bene vale
M. Arminia Maior Fabiana


> Part of what made the Romans of antiquity great was their ability
to
> ingest and syncretize new thinking; winnowing out what was patently
> non-Roman and clumping the rest on as accretions to their thought
> processes, always presented as either logically extending from
> already-held beliefs or simply as clever re-writing of old ones. I
> will grant you that *great* care must be taken in that ingestion
and
> winnowing process; but I think it folly to deny the process
> altogether.
>
> vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27644 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Salve, Cato.

<LOL> "Boni politico-speak" Well despite the imensity of the task, I
do happen to see parallels :)

As to the assimilitation of "new ideas", you make it sound as though
it was some ordered and almost erudite process. I think the process
was somewhat more chaotic than that.

The key point here I think is that for me is that when I think of
Rome of antiquity, I tend to think of Republican Rome, the
principate and the very early Emperors.

I still don't think that you have proved that a small gaggle of
court officials, families and associates constitutes a move of Roman
society. They were almost refugees. Equally their influence became
diluted and the all pervasive greek and eastern customs and
attitudes took hold more firmly than those founded in RA. I doubt if
Cato the Elder or Cicero or Augustus entered Byzantium, particuarly
towards its fall that they would have seen much in common with their
Rome.

I suppose we will have to agree to disagree - again :)

Vale
Caesar



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
<mlcinnyc@y...> wrote:
> O.S.D. G. Equitius Cato
>
> Salvete, omnes et singulator Gn. Iulio Caeso.
>
> Caesar,
>
> I understand precisely the point you are making in re: your
family,
> Canada, and Great Britain.
>
> However. The Byzantines did *not* think they were Roman in a
world
> that thought they were something else. The world in which
Byzantium
> existed accepted them as the Roman Empire. And as far as the
> Byzantines calling themselves Roman but not acting, etc., as
> Romans "in antiquity"...ummmm...well, the Byzantines got their
start
> in AD 330 with the founding of Constantinople. I don't know how
old
> you are, but to *me*, I'd consider that "antiquity" :-) We are
> farther away from them by several centuries than they were from
the
> founding of the City; I'd say they knew better than we do what
being
> a Roman was.
>
> I see where you're going with the "attitudes", "fuzzy"
thinking, "Mos
> Maiorum followed rigidly" stuff, and as usual, we will have to
calmly
> disagree. Boni politico-speak!
>
> Part of what made the Romans of antiquity great was their ability
to
> ingest and syncretize new thinking; winnowing out what was
patently
> non-Roman and clumping the rest on as accretions to their thought
> processes, always presented as either logically extending from
> already-held beliefs or simply as clever re-writing of old ones.
I
> will grant you that *great* care must be taken in that ingestion
and
> winnowing process; but I think it folly to deny the process
> altogether.
>
> vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
> <gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
> > Salve, Cato.
> >
> > My point exactly. Small minorities followed to the east. An
attempt
> > to intice the old senatorial families (old by the standards of
the
> > time) to the east failed dismally. Flunkies followed, as
flunkies
> > must else become unemployed. The rank and file Romans stayed put.
> >
> > As for what the rest of the world thought of Byzantium, they
> thought
> > what the Byzantines could enforce. With the decline of Byzantine
> > military power whether nations accorded the Emperor the
politeness
> > of terming him Roman is, just that - politeness.
> >
> > If in 500 years my ancestors still call themselves British but
live
> > in Canada, a Canada that in all liklihood will have long since
> > severed its remaining links with the UK, are they British? Even
if
> > their neighbours call them British are they? They don't live in
> > Britain, they will have assimilated Canadian and American
customs
> > and attitudes. They will not, I contend be British, whatever
they
> or
> > their neighbours think or say.
> >
> > I will be the last Brit of my line that endures (hopefully) in
> > Canada.
> >
> > As to what we are here - well that links to sovereignty and
> > nationhood. If we say we are the inheritors of Rome, are we just
> > because we say we are? We can think and believe we are, but what
> > does the rest of the world think? Even if a majority accepted
our
> > claim, would we be by just thinking it? That in turns links to
all
> > the issues that beset us here in NR. There are a lot of
attitudes
> at
> > work that are not Roman, a lot of suggested policies, laws, etc.
> > That is analagous to the Byzantines, calling themselves Roman,
but
> > not thinking or acting (or worshipping) as Romans of antiquity.
> >
> > Rome died in Rome. It will only truly be reborn here if the Mos
> > Maiorum is followed rigidly by the state and the vast majority
of
> > the citizens of Nova Roma. If that does not happen, then NR will
> > remain an image (and a very fuzzy one at that) of Rome of
antiquity.
> >
> > It will be a ghost of RA with a personality disorder.
> >
> > Vale
> > Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27645 From: pictominius Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Iusiurandum - Scriba Propraetoris Atrius Minius Pictor
IUSIURANDUM

Pro lege Iunia 19 october 2752 a.u.c. de iusiurando,

Pro edicto III 10 quintilis 2757 a.u.c. Propraetore Galliae Lucio
Rutilio Minervale, de Galliae praefectura,

Pro edicto V 3 sextilis 2757 a.u.c. Propraetore Galliae Lucio
Rutilio Minervale, de interpretatoriae curiae creatione

Pro edicto IX 15 sextilis 2757 a.u.c. Propraetore Galliae Lucio
Rutilio Minervale, de designatione proprie Atrio Minio Pictor Scriba
Propraetoris,

Ego, Atrius Minius Pictor (Sergio Mini), hoc ipso facto sollemniter
iuro Novae Romae decus defendere et semper pro Novae Romae Populo
atque Senatu agere.

Ut Novae Romae magistratus ego, Atrius Minius Pictor (Sergio Mini),
Romae deos deasque colere iuro in omnibus publicae vitae temporibus
atque Romanas virtutes et ublica et privata vita persequi.

Ego, Atrius Minius Pictor (Sergio Mini), Romanam religionem favere
et defendere iuro ut Novae Romae Reipublicae religionem et numquam
agere ita ut eius status publicae religionis aliquid detrimenti
capiat.

Praeterea ego, Atrius Minius Pictor (Sergio Mini), iuro quam optime
fungi officium muneris Scribae Propraetoris meum Novae Romae civis
honore et coram Populi Romani deis atque deabus et eorum voluntate
et favore, munus Scribae Propraetoris accipio, una cum iuribus,
privilegiis, munera atque officia quae meum munus comportat.



OATH

Whereas this oath is issued for purposes corresponding to the
purposes of :

- Oath Iunia act 19 october 2752 a.u.c.,

- Gallia Propraetor Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Edict number 3, 10
july 2757 a.u.c. about administration of Gallia province,

- Gallia Propraetor Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Edict number 5, 3
august 2757 a.u.c. creating an Translation Department (Curia),

- Gallia Propraetor Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Edict number 9, 15
august 2757 a.u.c. appointing notably Atrius Minius Pictor as a
Scriba Propraetoris,

I, Atrius Minius Pictor (Sergio Mini), do hereby solemnly swear to
uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best
interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Atrius Minius Pictor (Sergio Mini),
swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings,
and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Atrius Minius Pictor (Sergio Mini), swear to uphold and defend
the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear
never to act in a way that would threaten its status as the State
Religion.

I, Atrius Minius Pictor (Sergio Mini), swear to protect and defend
the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Atrius Minius Pictor (Sergio Mini), further swear to fulfill the
obligations and responsibilities of the office of Scriba
Propraetoris to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the
Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor,
do I accept the position of Scriba Propraetoris and all the rights,
privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.





PRESTATION DE SERMENT

Vu la loi Iunia du 19 octobre 2752 a.u.c. sur la prestation de
serment,

Vu l'édit III du 10 juillet 2757 a.u.c. par le Propréteur de Gaule
Lucius Rutilius Minervalis sur l'administration de Gallia,

Vu l'édit V du 3 août 2757 a.u.c. par le Propréteur de Gaule Lucius
Rutilius Minervalis instituant une Curie Interprétariale,

Vu l'édit IX du 15 août 2757 a.u.c. par le Propréteur de Gaule
Lucius Rutilius Minervalis désignant notamment Atrius Minius Pictor
comme Scriba Propraetoris,



Moi, Atrius Minius Pictor (Sergio Mini), jure solennellement par la
présente de soutenir l'honneur de Nova Roma en toutes circonstances
au mieux des intérêts du peuple et du Sénat de Nova Roma.

En tant que magistrat de Nova Roma, moi, Atrius Minius Pictor
(Sergio Mini), jure d'honorer les Dieux et Déesses de Rome dans mes
relations publiques et de poursuivre les Vertus Romaines dans ma vie
publique et privée.

Moi, Atrius Minius Pictor (Sergio Mini), jure de soutenir et
défendre la Religio Romana comme la Religion d'Etat de Nova Roma et
jure de ne jamais agir d'une manière qui menace son statut de
Religion d'Etat.

Moi, Atrius Minius Pictor (Sergio Mini), jure de protéger et de
défendre la Constitution de Nova Roma.

Moi, Atrius Minius Pictor (Sergio Mini), jure de plus de remplir au
mieux de mes capacités les obligations et responsabilités de la
fonction de Scribe proprétorien.

Sur mon honneur en tant que citoyen de Nova Roma, en présence des
Dieux et Déesses du peuple romain et par leur faveur et leur bon
vouloir, j'accepte formellement d'assurer la fonction de Scribe
proprétorien et tous les droits, privilèges, obligations et
responsabilités qui s'y rattachent.



Scr. Ruscino, Gallia, XVIII Kal. SEPTEMBRES MMDCCLVII AUC.


_________________
ATRIVS MINIVS PICTOR
Scriba Curatoris Interpretum
Civis Gentis Minia
Civis Galliae Provinciae
Civis Plebiae Novae Romae, Optima Maxima
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27646 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
O.S.D. G. Equitius Cato

salvete, omnes.

Caesar, interesting statement:

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
<gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
> I still don't think that you have proved that a small gaggle of
> court officials, families and associates constitutes a move of
>Roman society. They were almost refugees.

The reason I find it interesting is that it betrays a very VERY
modern sense of what "society" means. You seem to think that the
upper classes, the ones who followed the emperor to Constantinople to
create the Byzantine court, actually gave a rat's hiney what the
great masses thought. The Patricians despised the Plebs, and used
them only for their own ends. The great unwashed populace simply
didn't *matter* to anyone; they were the workforce, the drudges, the
ones who did all the stuff that the upper classes wouldn't dream of
doing. no-one cared what they thought or did, unless to mock them in
the theatre or to bribe them with games and bread for an upcoming
election. The average "Iulius-on-the-street" might have been bustin'
out with Romanitas, but nobody cared. Only the powerful mattered.

So when that great throng of imperial hangers-on moved to
Constantinople, they *did* bring with them Rome.

LOL Cato the Censor HATED anything foreign, so you're right, he'd
have absolutely despised Byzantium. Augustus, though.... :-)

valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27647 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Salve Cato

Oh I agree - those that went east probably thought themselves the
last of the Romans <g> just as those that stayed in Rome did.

Ultimately it is more a question of how quickly the influences they
bought from Rome were submerged into the eastern climate. In fact
one could ask what they brought from Rome, and how Roman that was.
Again it depends on what you think of as Roman.

The principate to Cicero would have been un-Roman. To a Roman of the
4th century it would have been the foundation of all that followed.
So the process of change and adaptation that you speak of is at work
continiously. We agree :) Where I diverge (I think) is that applying
my analogy of my descendants, that could in fact apply inside Rome
the city prior to the divide of the empire. Thus were those that
travelled east even "truly" Roman (ack. I have become Cato the Elder
<g> )? It is an interesting question and again has relevance to NR
in somuch as where and should we draw a line?

Interesting thread :)

Vale
Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27648 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Salve, Cato.

My point exactly. Small minorities followed to the east. An attempt
to intice the old senatorial families (old by the standards of the
time) to the east failed dismally. Flunkies followed, as flunkies
must else become unemployed. The rank and file Romans stayed put.

As for what the rest of the world thought of Byzantium, they thought
what the Byzantines could enforce. With the decline of Byzantine
military power whether nations accorded the Emperor the politeness
of terming him Roman is just that - politeness.

If in 500 years my ancestors still call themselves British but live
in Canada, a Canada that in all liklihood will have long since
severed its remaining links with the UK, are they British? Even if
their neighbours call them British are they? They don't live in
Britain, they will have assimilated Canadian and American customs
and attitudes. They will not, I contend be British, whatever they or
their neighbours think or say. I will be the last Brit of my line
that endures (hopefully) in Canada. Even if their neighbours humour
them and call them British.

As to what we are here - well that links to sovereignty and
nationhood. If we say we are the inheritors of Rome, are we just
because we say we are? We can think and believe we are, but what
does the rest of the world think? Even if a majority accepted our
claim, would we be by just thinking it? That in turn links to all
the issues that beset us here in NR. There are a lot of attitudes at
work that are not Roman, a lot of suggested policies, laws, etc.
That is analagous to the Byzantines, calling themselves Roman, but
not thinking or acting (or worshipping) as Romans of antiquity.

Rome died in Rome. It will only truly be reborn here if the Mos
Maiorum is followed rigidly by the state and the vast majority of
the citizens of Nova Roma. If that does not happen, then NR will
remain an image (and a very fuzzy one at that) of Rome of antiquity.

NR would then be a ghost of RA with a personality disorder.

Vale
Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
<mlcinnyc@y...> wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato Gn. iulio Caeso S.P.D.
>
> Salve, Iulius Caesar.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
> <gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
> > Salve, Cato.
> >
> > Rome lived on in the hearts and minds of who? > If you mean Rome
> lived on in Byzantium, it may have done as a memory
> > and heritage. It did not live on in the sense that Roman society
> had
> > just picked up its bags and transplanted itself "whole" to the
> east.
>
>
> CATO: Actually, that's exactly what it *did* do. The court
followed
> the emperor. When there was an emperor in the West, he usually
hung
> out in Ravenna; in the East, it was Constantinople. The imperial
> court did in fact, pick itself up and move to Constantinople once
St.
> Constantine I had settled himself there.
>
>
> >
> > As for beliefs, well they are all relative to the situation as
has
> > been pointed out. I can believe I am the Shah of Persia or the
> Mogul
> > Emperor, but am I? Only if I am generally accepted as such.
> Byzantium
> > was not Rome.
>
> CATO: The point I have been making (repeatedly) is that the
> Byzantines *were accepted as the Roman Empire* by everybody on
earth
> at the time. All of Europe, Asia, Africa, everyone recognized the
> emperors of Byzantium as the Roman Emperors. they didn't simply
> style themselves that way, as the Russians did after the Fall of
> Constantinople.
>
>
> > Rome died in Rome.
>
> CATO: Not according to history. And besides, O Caesar, are *we*
not
> the living revivification of Rome? :-) For Drusus: "Rome III:
> Darkness in the Senate House" :-D
>
>
> >
> > Vale
> > Caesar
>
>
> vale,
>
> Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27649 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
G. Equitius Cato Gn. Iulio Caesar S.P.D.

Salve, Caesar.

Where *do* we draw "the line"...

In fact, in the discussions on the Constitution List which our
Consul Marinus opened up to hear suggestions on reforming that
document, I think the general consensus was that we would leave out
specific dates altogether, as it was a never-ending carousel of
point-and-counterpoint as to which dates were more significant and
why.

More importantly, and you've touched on it, would be the questions
that should be asked of any law that is suggested. Various citizens
have suggested different ones, but they really boil down to:

"Will this law/edict/consultum etc. bring us closer to the mos
maiorum of the ancients?"

If the author claims it will, I would like to see ancient sources
which would support that claim. And those sources should by choice
come first from the Republican period.

E.G. - LEX CATONI TOGATUS - "All Nova Romans must wear a toga when
involved in public activities." supported by CICERO, de Finibus
Bonorum et Malorum (45 BC), Section 1.10.32: "...it is the singular
mark of a Roman citizen that he walks among other men togate as a
witness to the glory of Rome..." (I'm making up the reference, by
the way)

If there is no specific reference to the intent of the law in
question, I would say that the author should at least present
sources from the ancients which could show a logical progression
from their thought to his.

It would be up to the author of the law to supply the references,
and the responsibility of the citizens to judge (by voting) whether
or not they accept them. This would also encourage citizens to
research the primary sources of our existence.

vale,

Cato




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
<gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
> Salve Cato
>
> Oh I agree - those that went east probably thought themselves the
> last of the Romans <g> just as those that stayed in Rome did.
>
> Ultimately it is more a question of how quickly the influences
they
> bought from Rome were submerged into the eastern climate. In fact
> one could ask what they brought from Rome, and how Roman that was.
> Again it depends on what you think of as Roman.
>
> The principate to Cicero would have been un-Roman. To a Roman of
the
> 4th century it would have been the foundation of all that
followed.
> So the process of change and adaptation that you speak of is at
work
> continiously. We agree :) Where I diverge (I think) is that
applying
> my analogy of my descendants, that could in fact apply inside Rome
> the city prior to the divide of the empire. Thus were those that
> travelled east even "truly" Roman (ack. I have become Cato the
Elder
> <g> )? It is an interesting question and again has relevance to NR
> in somuch as where and should we draw a line?
>
> Interesting thread :)
>
> Vale
> Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27650 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-08-15
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Salve, Cato.

Indeed citing historical sources and rationale would be a good
discipline for keeping us more historic and the extra weight on the
Republican period is equally beneficial.

Vale
Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato Gn. Iulio Caesar S.P.D.
>
> Salve, Caesar.
>
> Where *do* we draw "the line"...
>
> In fact, in the discussions on the Constitution List which our
> Consul Marinus opened up to hear suggestions on reforming that
> document, I think the general consensus was that we would leave out
> specific dates altogether, as it was a never-ending carousel of
> point-and-counterpoint as to which dates were more significant and
> why.
>
> More importantly, and you've touched on it, would be the questions
> that should be asked of any law that is suggested. Various
citizens
> have suggested different ones, but they really boil down to:
>
> "Will this law/edict/consultum etc. bring us closer to the mos
> maiorum of the ancients?"
>
> If the author claims it will, I would like to see ancient sources
> which would support that claim. And those sources should by choice
> come first from the Republican period.
>
> E.G. - LEX CATONI TOGATUS - "All Nova Romans must wear a toga when
> involved in public activities." supported by CICERO, de Finibus
> Bonorum et Malorum (45 BC), Section 1.10.32: "...it is the singular
> mark of a Roman citizen that he walks among other men togate as a
> witness to the glory of Rome..." (I'm making up the reference, by
> the way)
>
> If there is no specific reference to the intent of the law in
> question, I would say that the author should at least present
> sources from the ancients which could show a logical progression
> from their thought to his.
>
> It would be up to the author of the law to supply the references,
> and the responsibility of the citizens to judge (by voting) whether
> or not they accept them. This would also encourage citizens to
> research the primary sources of our existence.
>
> vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
> <gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
> > Salve Cato
> >
> > Oh I agree - those that went east probably thought themselves the
> > last of the Romans <g> just as those that stayed in Rome did.
> >
> > Ultimately it is more a question of how quickly the influences
> they
> > bought from Rome were submerged into the eastern climate. In fact
> > one could ask what they brought from Rome, and how Roman that
was.
> > Again it depends on what you think of as Roman.
> >
> > The principate to Cicero would have been un-Roman. To a Roman of
> the
> > 4th century it would have been the foundation of all that
> followed.
> > So the process of change and adaptation that you speak of is at
> work
> > continiously. We agree :) Where I diverge (I think) is that
> applying
> > my analogy of my descendants, that could in fact apply inside
Rome
> > the city prior to the divide of the empire. Thus were those that
> > travelled east even "truly" Roman (ack. I have become Cato the
> Elder
> > <g> )? It is an interesting question and again has relevance to
NR
> > in somuch as where and should we draw a line?
> >
> > Interesting thread :)
> >
> > Vale
> > Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27651 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Absence
Salve Romans

I will be on vacation for the next week. I will be camping with the Boy Scouts and will be out of web range for most of that time. If any of you need to do something that could destroy Nova Roma could you at least wait until I get back so I can at least see this "fall". Thanks


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Multi famam, conscientiam pauci verentur.
(Many fear their reputation, few their conscience)
Pliny



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27652 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> Salve Cato;
> very well said. This stulta has taken so long to remember that
the
> Arabs called the Byzantium; Al Rum ...yes Roma, and many in the
West
> had that appellation, even the famous Turkish Poet Rumi, supposedly
> for a Christian mother I believe.
> And talking about syncretization, just think of the Christian
West
> and all the wisdom that they received from the great Muslim empires:
> Algebra, astronomy (Altair the star is an arabic word), Alcohol,
all
> kinds of medicine knowledge...which we today think of exclusively
> as "Western"..

True but don't forget where the Muslim empires received much of it
from: texts preserved from the classical world that the Muslims
preserved during a time when the West turned its back on knowledge.
This knowledge came full circle back home to the West through the
Muslims when the West was ready. (the Muslim empires also learned
much from Hindu India, including what are commonly miscalled Arabic
numerals)

Vale,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27653 From: Caius Curius Saturninus Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: meeting at Regio Finnica at the end of July, diary and photos
Salvete omnes,

Here is a small diary and some pictures from the meeting we had in
Regio Finnica:

http://www.insulaumbra.com/regiofinnica/rfmeeting04/

Valete,
--

Caius Curius Saturninus

Quaestor
Legatus Regionis Finnicae
Procurator Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
Praeses et Triumvir Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.insulaumbra.com/regiofinnica
www.academiathules.org
gsm: +358-50-3315279
fax: +358-9-8754751

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27654 From: Casta Meretrix Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: meeting at Regio Finnica at the end of July, diary and photos
Salve Saturninus,

It was a surprise to see Consul Gnaeus Salix in the
photos. Didn't both he and M Arminius Maior resign?

Vale,
Diana Octavia

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27655 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: meeting at Regio Finnica at the end of July, diary and photos
Salve, Diana

I do not remember a single line of Senior Consul Salix Astur
resigning from the office of Consul. On the other hand, what it has
to be with the fact of a citizen who tries to get in touch with
other citizens? I do myself have been to Dublin and visited Hibernia
Propraetrix, Arminia Maior, who is quite well active and willing to
do things there, and in Segovia, we have had Lupus, Cordus and Fabia
visiting us. So, I do not understand your surprise indeed. Do not
wish all to get in touch with our fellow citizens? Holding an office
is not a point here... :-)

I will be surprised the day all novaroman appears in a huge
picture... that will be really a surprise.

vale bene in pace deorum,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
PROPRAETOR·HISPANIAE


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Casta Meretrix <meretrix4@y...>
wrote:
> Salve Saturninus,
>
> It was a surprise to see Consul Gnaeus Salix in the
> photos. Didn't both he and M Arminius Maior resign?
>
> Vale,
> Diana Octavia
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27656 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: Absence
In a message dated 8/15/04 9:39:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time, spqr753@...
writes:

will be on vacation for the next week. I will be camping with the Boy Scouts
and will be out of web range for most of that time. If any of you need to do
something that could destroy Nova Roma could you at least wait until I get
back so I can at least see this "fall". Thanks




Salve Tribune.

Go enjoy your vacation. Rome will be here upon your return.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27657 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: The true heirs of Rome
In a message dated 8/15/04 12:43:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
mlcinnyc@... writes:

And *we* Byzantinists recognize no such interruption in the imperial
power, nor its dissolution either during or after the
Fourth "Crusade". The emperors were still crowned Basileus Romaoi
and considered themselves the only true heir to the Roman Empire.
That is why there was such consternation over Lombard claims to the
imperial dignity, supported by the bishops of Rome even before the
final Schism between East and West.

Fabius Maximus, Vedius Germanicus said that as long as Rome was true
to the religio, she won. There was no hint of question or
qualification. I took him at his word, not some implied idea:




Sorry, Even before 1204 signs of difficulty were apparent. The large fuedal
estates, the constant pressure of the Caliphs, and the heresies. Rome II
was in trouble.
With the loss of the Central Government in 1204, the disolution was
complete.
Sure the two smaller empires of Nicea and Trapozidia said they were Roman as
did the reconstituted empire in 1300s. But, everybody else who was
contempoary called them Greeks. Both the Russians and the Bulgars called themselves
Roman as well. Did it make it so? No.
Bury, should be read with caution, (I assume this where you are getting your
facts, as this was one of his arguments) Anastos, Gregoire, Nicol are more
modern and should be consulted as well. Obolensky who used to be at Oxford,
wrote several monographs on how the Bulgars assumed they were the true heirs,
since their military nucleus had traditional units that traced their history
back to the Roman Auxilia in the 400s still in the 1300s.
Were they really Roman? No.

My point is the Dominate issued in by the Severi and codified under
Diocletianus was not the middle republic by any means.
We all should remember this.

As for Vedius comments I'm sure he can speak for himself.

Q. Fabius Maximus



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27658 From: L. Modius Kaelus Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: RE: The meaning of sacrifice Re: [ReligioRomana]
Yes, they did indeed call it "Al Rum", but the texts that I've read
do not acknowledge Byzantium as a continuation of Rome as much as a
successor, but a legitimate one. Also, as a devout fan of Rumi I feel
it necessary to point out he was Farsi (Persian, from Iran), not
Turkish.

I also find it interesting that the word "alcohol" is an adoption
from Arabic, when the Muslims themselves have a religious taboo
against intoxicants. ;-) And it certainly must have been widely
spoken in order to be integrated into european languages.. Perhaps
the caliphate Muslims were not so opposed to alcohol as those staunch
conservatives of today, I'm thinking. ;-)

Vale,
L. Modius Kaelus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> Salve Cato;
> very well said. This stulta has taken so long to remember that
the
> Arabs called the Byzantium; Al Rum ...yes Roma, and many in the
West
> had that appellation, even the famous Turkish Poet Rumi, supposedly
> for a Christian mother I believe.
> And talking about syncretization, just think of the Christian
West
> and all the wisdom that they received from the great Muslim empires:
> Algebra, astronomy (Altair the star is an arabic word), Alcohol,
all
> kinds of medicine knowledge...which we today think of exclusively
> as "Western"..
> Rome never existed in a vacuum...its religio borrowed from Greece
> and Magna Mater came from Turkey, syncretization was the basis of
its
> greatness, that a man from Egypt, England, France, Spain Libya,
> Italy, Greece, Germany,Syria, Israel, Algeria. Turkey all could
> say "I am a Roman"
> too often we forget this,
> bene vale
> M. Arminia Maior Fabiana
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27659 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: meeting at Regio Finnica at the end of July, diary and photos
ave Saturnine,

nice story and pictures! Once again I've lost the chance to play at
RoR....! :-(
take my regards to you father: I was pleased to meet him last year!
:-)

vale
M IVL PERVISIANVS,
Aedilis Curulis

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Caius Curius Saturninus
<c.curius@w...> wrote:
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Here is a small diary and some pictures from the meeting we had in
> Regio Finnica:
>
> http://www.insulaumbra.com/regiofinnica/rfmeeting04/
>
> Valete,
> --
>
> Caius Curius Saturninus
>
> Quaestor
> Legatus Regionis Finnicae
> Procurator Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
> Praeses et Triumvir Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
>
> e-mail: c.curius@a...
> www.insulaumbra.com/regiofinnica
> www.academiathules.org
> gsm: +358-50-3315279
> fax: +358-9-8754751
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27660 From: Teleri Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: Investment of Imperium
Helena Galeria Aurialiana Augur quiritibus salutem
dicit
Salvete, Quirites.

I, Augur, Helena Galeria Aurialiana Lictor Curiatus
Novae Romae, hereby witness the investment of Gaius
Popollius Laenas with the imperium praetoris in the
consulship of Cn. Salix Astur and Gn. Equitius
Marinus.

I also acknowledge and witness.
the ascension to priesthood of Flavius Galerius
Aurelianus (Flamen Cerealis),
Lucia Modia Lupa (Sacerdos Aedis Dianae),
and Agrippina Modia Aurelia (Sacerdos Aedis
Necessitatis).

Di Immortales, vos bonas preces precor ut istum
praetorem recte ducatis.

Valete
Helena Galeria Aurialiana Augur
Materfamilias Galeria

(ps - thanking LEC for the form LOL)






__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27661 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: A Warning
Salvete Quirites,

This message is for Citizens that use the Microsoft Windows XP
Operating system. Microsoft is about to release a service pack to
upgrade Windows XP. This service pack will fix some bad security
problems with the operating system, but it may also cause some
programs that you have installed on your computer to stop working.

In the past some of Microsoft's service packs have trashed user's
computers and/or caused more new problems than they solved. I would
strongly advise that you hold off on installing this update for a few
days. Let other people find if there are major problems caused by SP2.

If no major problems turn up, then you should install this update to
your computer, but do a little research first, check to see if the
software you have on your computer needs to have it's settings
modified to work with the upgraded XP. There are allready 50 programs
that are known to have problems, and the list will grow over the next
few days.

L. Sicinius Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27662 From: jmath669642reng@webtv.net Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Congratulations
I wish to provide to the new Magistrates of Nova Roma, my
congratulations and best wishes for your election.

I am confident that the will of the people of Nova Roma have spoken in
favor of those who will do a fine job in working toward her governing.

--Gaius Popillius Laenas;

--Gaius Moravius Lauentius Amoricus;

--Quintus Cassius Calvus.

Respectfully;

Marcus Minucius-Tiberius Audens


Wishing you all the best, with Fair Winds and Following Seas!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27663 From: Daniel Dreesbach Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Investment of Imperium
I, Lucius Gauis Geminius Germanus, Lictor Curiatus Novae Romae, hereby witness the investment of Gaius Popollius Laenas with the imperium praetoris in the consulship of Cn. Salix Astur and Gn. Equitius Marinus.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27664 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: The true heirs of Rome
Salve,

I thought it was obvious that my statement about Rome winning while She
honored the Gods was meant somewhat figuratively, in the spirit of the
broad sweeps of history, and not specifically referring to every
skirmish fought by a Legio. But I suppose if someone wishes to parse
words to death in order to make a(n opposite) point, they can do so no
matter whatever may be the obvious intent of the author.

Vale,

Flavius Vedius Germanicus

QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:

>
>
> As for Vedius comments I'm sure he can speak for himself.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27665 From: jmath669642reng@webtv.net Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Investment of Imperium
I, Marcus Minucius-Tiberius Audens, Lictor Curiatus Novae Romae, hereby
witness the investment of Gaius Ppollius Laenas with the imperium
praetoris in the consulship of Cn, Salix Astur ad Gn. Equitius Marinus.

I am also pleased and honored to witness the ascension to priesthood of
Flavius Galerius Aurelianus (Flamen Cerialis) , Lucia Modia Lupa
(Sacerdos Aedis Dianae) and Agrippina Modia Arelia (Sacerds Aedis
Necessitatis) as reported by Pontifex L. Equitius Cincinnatus.

Respectfully Submitted;

Marcus Minucius-Tiberius Audens.


Wishing you all the best, with Fair Winds and Following Seas!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27666 From: Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: Congratulations
I wish to add my congratulations to all of our new magistrates. I
have nothing but faith in these three good people.

Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, jmath669642reng@w... wrote:
>
> I wish to provide to the new Magistrates of Nova Roma, my
> congratulations and best wishes for your election.
>
> I am confident that the will of the people of Nova Roma have
spoken in
> favor of those who will do a fine job in working toward her
governing.
>
> --Gaius Popillius Laenas;
>
> --Gaius Moravius Lauentius Amoricus;
>
> --Quintus Cassius Calvus.
>
> Respectfully;
>
> Marcus Minucius-Tiberius Audens
>
>
> Wishing you all the best, with Fair Winds and Following Seas!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27667 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: meeting at Regio Finnica at the end of July, diary and photos
Salvete;
I believe Diana Octavia was reading Censor Sulla's suggestions from
the Orwellian "Peace" List, wherein he suggested Consul Astur resign
and I leave Nova Roma and join some other organization.
I've exited that list for the above reasons, and that fact that
certain issues are just glossed over with clever wordplay.

Diana Octavia, FYI I will never, ever leave Nova Roma. I've made
wonderful friends and learned so much about Roma Antiqua, you can
have all the century points your heart desires & remove mine, your
reasons are not my reasons.
To all my wonderful amici present and future, thank you for
all your hard work and devotion.
valete
M. Arminia Maior Fabiana

Propraetrix Hiberniae
scriba Iuris et
Investigatio CFQ





It was a surprise to see Consul Gnaeus Salix in the
> > photos. Didn't both he and M Arminius Maior resign?
> >
> > Vale,
> > Diana Octavia
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27668 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Results of the Plebiscite
Salvete, roman people of the Quirites,

By the continuous blessings of Ceres and Diana, patronesses of the Plebs, these are the results of the last Comitia Plebis Tributa:

18 Tribes voted Yes on the Lex Arminia de Suffragiis in Comitiis Tributiis.
7 Tribes voted No.

So, Lex Arminia de Suffragiis in Comitiis Tributiis is hereby approved.

I must thank again the participation of the sovereign will of the roman people of the quirites and praise all the gods by the opportunity to make a better Nova Roma throught the Comitialis System.

Valete bene in pacem deorum,

L. Arminius Faustus

Tribunus Plebis





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - navegue de graça com conexão de qualidade!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27669 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: meeting at Regio Finnica at the end of July, diary and photos
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> Salvete;
> I believe Diana Octavia was reading Censor Sulla's suggestions from
> the Orwellian "Peace" List, wherein he suggested Consul Astur resign
> and I leave Nova Roma and join some other organization.

Drusus: That would be rather hard to do since she isn't a member of
that list.

> I've exited that list for the above reasons, and that fact that
> certain issues are just glossed over with clever wordplay.

Drusus: You are still listed as a member of the list despite your
claims of quitting.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceNR/members?start=1&group=sub&sorted=3

The situation over there was more like you claimed you were quitting
after no one listened to your constant tirade of spite and bitterness,
not even the non-boni on the list.

L. Sicinius Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27670 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Praetorian Edict
Praetorian Edict 2004-1

G. Popillius Laenas Quiritibus S. P. D.

This Praetorian Edict makes appointments for Praetorian Scribia.

Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus and Quintus Caecilius Metellus
Postumianus are appointed Praetorian Scribia serving as moderators
of the Nova Roma Main List.

Lucius Iulius Sulla, who is serving as a Praetorian Quaestor, will
continue his duties including Main List moderation.

Given under my hand August 16, 2004 (2757 auc) in the Consulship of
Gnaeus Salix Astur and Gnaeus Equitius Marinus.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27671 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: The philosophy of the Boni (WAS: Senator Sulla- The End
Salvete Quirites;
please feel free to read some of my posts & replies from
the "Peace" List and do go there yourselves. Judge for yourselves.
valete
Maior

In PeaceNR@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
--- >
> Sulla: Look Maior, you remind of a Reformed Jew....My rabbi and
many tutors have told me about them....that they do not practice
Judiasm. >
>
MAIOR: Ah 'them' and that's what's so profoundly unJewish about
you Sulla & why so many in NR ask me doubtfully if you are.....
>
> .
> And this Discussion is now closed
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27672 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: Where is Scaurus?
--- In PeaceNR@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
well I am glad of that Scaure, a spirit of amity and working
together will accomplish much more than repeating fruitless past
arguments. I've just come from surgery and I have no desire to fight
with anyone...
vale
Maior
--- End forwarded message ---
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27673 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
--- In PeaceNR@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
--- In PeaceNR@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
> OK. Consider me shut up.
>
> Cato
>
>
getting yourself on trial for a charge
> of
> > impietas imprudens dolo malo.


Salve; and you wonder why I want to know what is going on in the CP?

"impietas imprudens dolo malo"
our new toy to make us tremble
Not to worry Cato I can get a good lawyer for you, if you actually
have a trial.
vale
Maior
--- End forwarded message ---
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27674 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
--- In PeaceNR@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> Wow, feeling better now and read the below, Scaurus you're right up
there with Nelson Mandela,
Please, take a holiday and get some perspective. I am quite
serious look at your post and your anger. You sound postively
fanatical and frankly whereas yrs truly can sound pissed off etc...I
don't think I am the saviour..I'm just a person, entirely expendable,
NR can live and thrive without either of us. And that really is the
truth,
vale
Maior




> I'm frankly getting a little tired of feeling like the black man at
a
> Klan rally on the subject of animal sacrifice. This is an
> issue over which I am prepared to suffer imprisonment or spend
myself to
> penury, and to exercise every legal weapon at hand to defend the
sacra
> Romana.
>
> Vale.
>
> Scaurus
--- End forwarded message ---
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27675 From: Galus Agorius Taurinus Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Greetings! Gens Agoria's Home Page is up and running...
Blessings to you all, fellow citizens.

Please remember that it was the Religio and the Gods that made Rome
great.



Homepage of Gens Agoria:

http://www.thecrookedheath.com/syriktes/gens.htm



G. Agorius Taurinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27676 From: Samantha Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
Maior,
No offense, but I am sure that if everyone wanted to read these posts
from the Peace list they would join the list and read it there. I
don't see the point of cross posting it here.
Particularly just catching one small part of the whole conversation
in one post.

Lucia Modia Lupa

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> --- In PeaceNR@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> > Wow, feeling better now and read the below, Scaurus you're right
up
> there with Nelson Mandela,
> Please, take a holiday and get some perspective. I am quite
> serious look at your post and your anger. You sound postively
> fanatical and frankly whereas yrs truly can sound pissed off
etc...I
> don't think I am the saviour..I'm just a person, entirely
expendable,
> NR can live and thrive without either of us. And that really is the
> truth,
> vale
> Maior
message ---
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27677 From: deciusiunius Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: meeting at Regio Finnica at the end of July, diary and photos
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> Salvete;
> I believe Diana Octavia was reading Censor Sulla's suggestions
from
> the Orwellian "Peace" List, wherein he suggested Consul Astur resign
> and I leave Nova Roma and join some other organization.
> I've exited that list for the above reasons, and that fact that
> certain issues are just glossed over with clever wordplay.

I've been reading that list, though not yet posting there, and have
to admit I saw no real good faith attempt on your part to discuss or
resolve issues or try to bring peace between the factions. For the
most part you use it as just another venue to attack those you don't
like. You could at least TRY to post in good faith.


Palladius

--------------
--------------
--------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27678 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
Salve;
I do not appreciate Diana Octavia, Senator Drusus nor yourself
making opinions of my behavior without producting proof. Here was one
of my last posts on an issue. Let it be for the cives to decide.
Maior

In PeaceNR@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
Salvete;
Gnaeus Caesar I really truly am trying to find a via media, and yes
a lot of cives write to me about this issue, they want to participate
but are put off. Indagtix, sorry I can't spell her cognomen properly
wants to be a Vestal, but won't put herself foward officially for
fear she will be asked to perform an animal sacrifice.
This is not about me, I'm going to be a priest in Macro world.
Frankly most polytheists that you will find, witches etc..are against
animal sacrifice. So I don't understand saying that the PM and
Gryllus's opionions don't matter and they can't oversee the cives and
sacerdotes who will offer fruits and vegetables.
Comparing it to the EU means nothing except I can travel to Italy
with the same money. I'm just talking about the CP being open to
both sides with representation, and public.
Is there anything wrong about that?
When someone like Drusus replies with his raelian nonsense it just
discredits him, the issue stays, which is why it comes up. I didn't
talk about it Maxima a new civis did. It is a concern and addressing
it openly and fairly I think is a good idea.
Maior
--- End forwarded message ---
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27679 From: Samantha Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
Maior,
Again respectfully I don't understand why you are wishing for the
cives to decide. How can anyone decide anything based on just one
persons single post.
From your post here alone one could say.. well CP gives the rite to
chose which you are willing to do, so what is the point? Also they
could turn around and say.. what is this about a Vestal.. Vestals
didn't perform sacrafices. I am sorry but there really isn't anyway
one is going to be able to have a solid opinion about this without
having heard the entire conversation on the Peace list.
Certainly if people wish to read this line, do encourage those
interested to subscribe to the Peace list rather then posting small
fractions of entire conversations please :)
Just a suggestion :)

Lucia Modia Lupa

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> Salve;
> I do not appreciate Diana Octavia, Senator Drusus nor yourself
> making opinions of my behavior without producting proof. Here was
one
> of my last posts on an issue. Let it be for the cives to decide.
> Maior
>
> In PeaceNR@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> Salvete;
> Gnaeus Caesar I really truly am trying to find a via media, and
yes
> a lot of cives write to me about this issue, they want to
participate
> but are put off. Indagtix, sorry I can't spell her cognomen
properly
> wants to be a Vestal, but won't put herself foward officially for
> fear she will be asked to perform an animal sacrifice.
> This is not about me, I'm going to be a priest in Macro
world.
> Frankly most polytheists that you will find, witches etc..are
against
> animal sacrifice. So I don't understand saying that the PM and
> Gryllus's opionions don't matter and they can't oversee the cives
and
> sacerdotes who will offer fruits and vegetables.
> Comparing it to the EU means nothing except I can travel to
Italy
> with the same money. I'm just talking about the CP being open to
> both sides with representation, and public.
> Is there anything wrong about that?
> When someone like Drusus replies with his raelian nonsense it
just
> discredits him, the issue stays, which is why it comes up. I didn't
> talk about it Maxima a new civis did. It is a concern and
addressing
> it openly and fairly I think is a good idea.
> Maior
> --- End forwarded message ---
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27680 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
LOL,

Diana hasn't commented about what you have done on a list that she
isn't a member of, while your last post to the list contained insults
and the ouright lie that you were leaving a list that you are still
listed as being subscribed to hours later.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceNR/members?start=1&group=sub&sorted=3

Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> Salve;
> I do not appreciate Diana Octavia, Senator Drusus nor yourself
> making opinions of my behavior without producting proof. Here was one
> of my last posts on an issue. Let it be for the cives to decide.
> Maior
>
> In PeaceNR@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> Salvete;
> Gnaeus Caesar I really truly am trying to find a via media, and yes
> a lot of cives write to me about this issue, they want to participate
> but are put off. Indagtix, sorry I can't spell her cognomen properly
> wants to be a Vestal, but won't put herself foward officially for
> fear she will be asked to perform an animal sacrifice.
> This is not about me, I'm going to be a priest in Macro world.
> Frankly most polytheists that you will find, witches etc..are against
> animal sacrifice. So I don't understand saying that the PM and
> Gryllus's opionions don't matter and they can't oversee the cives and
> sacerdotes who will offer fruits and vegetables.
> Comparing it to the EU means nothing except I can travel to Italy
> with the same money. I'm just talking about the CP being open to
> both sides with representation, and public.
> Is there anything wrong about that?
> When someone like Drusus replies with his raelian nonsense it just
> discredits him, the issue stays, which is why it comes up. I didn't
> talk about it Maxima a new civis did. It is a concern and addressing
> it openly and fairly I think is a good idea.
> Maior
> --- End forwarded message ---
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27681 From: k.a.wright Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
----- Original Message -----
From: "Maior" <rory12001@...>

> Frankly most polytheists that you will find, witches etc..are against
> animal sacrifice.

I'm sorry but I really don't see how you can say "most" polytheists are
against animal sacrifice. As a polytheist I'm concerned about what pleases
the Gods I worship. Since we 'know' they find animal sacrifice pleasing,
then why on earth would I be against it. Frankly the only polytheists I
know that are against it are Hindu's and other Eastern Polytheists but that
has absolutely nothing to do with the Religio Romana

Flavia Lucilla Merula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27682 From: Maior Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
,Salve;
well then I don't know how she knew Consul Sulla's remark unless you
all discussed it on the Boni list.
Senator, kindly do not call me a liar, I have not posted since I
left, but like any good lawyer, made sure I still have access to
evidence to protect my good name from such like you.
vale
M. Arminia Maior Fabiana

>
> Diana hasn't commented about what you have done on a list that she
> isn't a member of, while your last post to the list contained
insults
> and the ouright lie that you were leaving a list that you are still
> listed as being subscribed to hours later.
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceNR/members?
start=1&group=sub&sorted=3
>
> Drusus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> > Salve;
> > I do not appreciate Diana Octavia, Senator Drusus nor yourself
> > making opinions of my behavior without producting proof. Here was
one
> > of my last posts on an issue. Let it be for the cives to decide.
> > Maior
> >
> > In PeaceNR@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> > Salvete;
> > Gnaeus Caesar I really truly am trying to find a via media, and
yes
> > a lot of cives write to me about this issue, they want to
participate
> > but are put off. Indagtix, sorry I can't spell her cognomen
properly
> > wants to be a Vestal, but won't put herself foward officially for
> > fear she will be asked to perform an animal sacrifice.
> > This is not about me, I'm going to be a priest in Macro
world.
> > Frankly most polytheists that you will find, witches etc..are
against
> > animal sacrifice. So I don't understand saying that the PM and
> > Gryllus's opionions don't matter and they can't oversee the cives
and
> > sacerdotes who will offer fruits and vegetables.
> > Comparing it to the EU means nothing except I can travel to
Italy
> > with the same money. I'm just talking about the CP being open to
> > both sides with representation, and public.
> > Is there anything wrong about that?
> > When someone like Drusus replies with his raelian nonsense it
just
> > discredits him, the issue stays, which is why it comes up. I
didn't
> > talk about it Maxima a new civis did. It is a concern and
addressing
> > it openly and fairly I think is a good idea.
> > Maior
> > --- End forwarded message ---
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27683 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> ,Salve;
> well then I don't know how she knew Consul Sulla's remark unless you
> all discussed it on the Boni list.

Did it occur to you that she, along with a lot of other citizens, may
have assumed that Gnaeus Salix Astur and Marcus Arminius Maior have
left Nova Roma? Neither have shown any activity in their offices for
some time, at least not any that is apparant to readers of this list.

Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27684 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
Salvete omnes

As far as I'm concerned, being so close to Consul Astur, I can say
that he is working hard both for Nova Roma and on his new job. In
fact, in Hispania, within the Oppidum Complutensis we have him as
one of the most active citizens when he is free from his job. And
into the Hispania List and the Legio VIIII Hispanica list he uses to
post messages. The fact is that he is trying to do things instead of
typing them. So be aware, those who doesn't write in the ML are not
definitively out of Nova Roma. On the other hand, he is quite formal
an gentle that he wouldn't resign without making it clear in a
message posted to us with the why and how and when, something that
has not happened an is unlikely to happen, personally I add.

I would ask then for the respect our Senior Consul deserves.


vale bene in pace deorum,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
PROPRAETOR·HISPANIAE



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "John Dobbins" <drusus@b...> wrote:
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> > ,Salve;
> > well then I don't know how she knew Consul Sulla's remark
unless you
> > all discussed it on the Boni list.
>
> Did it occur to you that she, along with a lot of other citizens,
may
> have assumed that Gnaeus Salix Astur and Marcus Arminius Maior have
> left Nova Roma? Neither have shown any activity in their offices
for
> some time, at least not any that is apparant to readers of this
list.
>
> Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27685 From: John Dobbins Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
Salve,

Since I, like the majority of Nova Romans, aren't subscribed to those
lists we have no way of knowing what the Consul is doing there, but if
he insists on refraining from posting on this list, then he has no one
but himself to blame when citizens start wondering if he still has any
intrest in Nova Roma.

L. Sicinius Drusus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Didius Geminus Sceptius"
<sceptia@y...> wrote:
> Salvete omnes
>
> As far as I'm concerned, being so close to Consul Astur, I can say
> that he is working hard both for Nova Roma and on his new job. In
> fact, in Hispania, within the Oppidum Complutensis we have him as
> one of the most active citizens when he is free from his job. And
> into the Hispania List and the Legio VIIII Hispanica list he uses to
> post messages. The fact is that he is trying to do things instead of
> typing them. So be aware, those who doesn't write in the ML are not
> definitively out of Nova Roma. On the other hand, he is quite formal
> an gentle that he wouldn't resign without making it clear in a
> message posted to us with the why and how and when, something that
> has not happened an is unlikely to happen, personally I add.
>
> I would ask then for the respect our Senior Consul deserves.
>
>
> vale bene in pace deorum,
>
> L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
> PROPRAETOR·HISPANIAE
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "John Dobbins" <drusus@b...> wrote:
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> > > ,Salve;
> > > well then I don't know how she knew Consul Sulla's remark
> unless you
> > > all discussed it on the Boni list.
> >
> > Did it occur to you that she, along with a lot of other citizens,
> may
> > have assumed that Gnaeus Salix Astur and Marcus Arminius Maior have
> > left Nova Roma? Neither have shown any activity in their offices
> for
> > some time, at least not any that is apparant to readers of this
> list.
> >
> > Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27686 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
Salve

Senator Drusus, Nova Roma is *not* only this List. This is one place
amongst almost 100 novarroman lists. And I tell you once more;
doing, not typing, makes the difference.

Consul Astur has been indeed to Thules, has been in the European
Rallye of Segovia 2004, and we see him every month, twice or more
times, working for the Oppidum, for Hispania and for its Legio
VIIII. I don't fight others battles, but speaking for Consul Astur
is speaking for many other citizens who doesn't waste their times
reading that of "I'm better than you" "No, I'm better than you" "No,
my father is better than you" "no..." etc... you can see what I
mean, can you?.

Since I, like a silent majority of Nova Romans, are stick to action
more than to words, there is no way to know why some idles waste
their times on putting the blame of such a childish thing. What's
your interest on Nova Roma, Senator? On gaining Century Points and
display how many messages can you send till yahoogroups makes the
limit of the day? May I be wrong with you and many others? I hope
so, but my sceptical point of view is not very far from the truth.

Many times I see it, many times I denounce it. Amatheurisism, that
is our particular plague. And childish accusations and quarrels. At
least, our Consul Astur is on the pictures with more than 20
citizens of many Provinces. How many novarromans can say so? And you
say "lack of interest"... amazing.

Nothing more to say. It makes the proof once more.


vale bene in pace deorum,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
PROPRAETOR·HISPANIAE

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "John Dobbins" <drusus@b...> wrote:
> Salve,
>
> Since I, like the majority of Nova Romans, aren't subscribed to
those
> lists we have no way of knowing what the Consul is doing there,
but if
> he insists on refraining from posting on this list, then he has no
one
> but himself to blame when citizens start wondering if he still has
any
> intrest in Nova Roma.
>
> L. Sicinius Drusus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Didius Geminus Sceptius"
> <sceptia@y...> wrote:
> > Salvete omnes
> >
> > As far as I'm concerned, being so close to Consul Astur, I can
say
> > that he is working hard both for Nova Roma and on his new job.
In
> > fact, in Hispania, within the Oppidum Complutensis we have him
as
> > one of the most active citizens when he is free from his job.
And
> > into the Hispania List and the Legio VIIII Hispanica list he
uses to
> > post messages. The fact is that he is trying to do things
instead of
> > typing them. So be aware, those who doesn't write in the ML are
not
> > definitively out of Nova Roma. On the other hand, he is quite
formal
> > an gentle that he wouldn't resign without making it clear in a
> > message posted to us with the why and how and when, something
that
> > has not happened an is unlikely to happen, personally I add.
> >
> > I would ask then for the respect our Senior Consul deserves.
> >
> >
> > vale bene in pace deorum,
> >
> > L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
> > PROPRAETOR·HISPANIAE
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "John Dobbins" <drusus@b...>
wrote:
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...>
wrote:
> > > > ,Salve;
> > > > well then I don't know how she knew Consul Sulla's remark
> > unless you
> > > > all discussed it on the Boni list.
> > >
> > > Did it occur to you that she, along with a lot of other
citizens,
> > may
> > > have assumed that Gnaeus Salix Astur and Marcus Arminius Maior
have
> > > left Nova Roma? Neither have shown any activity in their
offices
> > for
> > > some time, at least not any that is apparant to readers of
this
> > list.
> > >
> > > Drusus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 27687 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2004-08-16
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: to settle the sacrifice problem
F. Galerius Aurelianus Senator L. Sicinius Drusus. Salve.

You are correct in feeling that if a magistrate is not regularly posting on
the ML, he may not be active in Nova Roma. However, assumption is the mother
of all screw-ups. I asked about the Senior Consul about a month ago and the
Junior Consul responded about what he was up to and why he had been away from
the ML. He did get mentioned several times in the past month including the most
recent information about the Finnica Gathering. I was surprised when I
discovered he had shaved off his beard.

Once again, it is apparent that greater efforts need to be made in the area
of personal communication. If you are wondering what a magistrate or member of
the Sacred College is up to, it doesn't take long to email them or post a
note on the ML that you are seeking communication with them.

Vale.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]