Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Dec 21-24, 2004

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31422 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Polybius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31423 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Polybius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31424 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Polybius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31425 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Polybius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31426 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31427 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31428 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31429 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31430 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31431 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31432 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31433 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31434 From: CornMoraviusL@aol.com Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Quid Novi - pdf format
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31435 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31436 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Marcus Municus Choices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31437 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31438 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Divergent viewpoints
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31439 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Divergent viewpoints
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31440 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Faction Smacktion I have arrived!!!!!!!!!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31441 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31442 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Divergent viewpoints
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31443 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Divergent viewpoints
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31444 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Divergent viewpoints
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31445 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Faction Smacktion I have arrived!!!!!!!!!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31446 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: The Boni remain as a group. was Re: [Nova-Roma] Divergent viewpoints
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31447 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Divergent viewpoints
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31448 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31449 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31450 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31451 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31452 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Faction Smacktion I have arrived!!!!!!!!!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31453 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Faction Smacktion I have arrived!!!!!!!!!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31454 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Faction Smacktion I have arrived!!!!!!!!!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31455 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Faction Smacktion I have arrived!!!!!!!!!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31456 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Faction Smacktion I have arrived!!!!!!!!!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31457 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Divergent viewpoints
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31458 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Cato Gets Crankier
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31459 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Cato Gets Crankier
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31460 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Cato Gets Crankier
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31461 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Polybius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31462 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31463 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: And if you all would calm down?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31464 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: New Nova Roman Oath of Office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31465 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: And if you all would calm down?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31466 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: And if you all would calm down?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31467 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: And if you all would calm down part II
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31468 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31469 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: New Nova Roman Oath of Office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31470 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: New Nova Roman Oath of Office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31471 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: And if you all would calm down, or shut down?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31472 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: And if you all would calm down part II
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31473 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: And if you all would calm down?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31474 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: And if you all would calm down?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31475 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31476 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: A question for All candidates and others on Elected Pontiffs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31477 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31478 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: And if you all would calm down?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31479 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: A question for All candidates and others on Elected Pontiffs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31480 From: Susan Davis Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31481 From: Legion XXIV Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Legion XXIV Vicesima Quarta Newsletter Dec-2004
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31482 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Cato Gets Crankier
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31483 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: And if you all would calm down?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31484 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31485 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: A question for All candidates and others on Elected Pontiffs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31486 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31487 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Polybius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31488 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Conga lines
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31489 From: CornMoraviusL@aol.com Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31490 From: CornMoraviusL@aol.com Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31491 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31492 From: Decimus Iunius Silanus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31493 From: Decimus Iunius Silanus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31494 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31495 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31496 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: New Nova Roman Oath of Office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31497 From: Dan Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31498 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31499 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31500 From: CornMoraviusL@aol.com Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31501 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: A question for All candidates and others on Elected Pontiffs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31502 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31503 From: Decimus Iunius Silanus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31504 From: CornMoraviusL@aol.com Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31505 From: rory kirshner Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: FAUSTUS FOR PRAETOR - The Imperium of Respect
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31506 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: A question for All candidates and others on Elected Pontiffs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31507 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31508 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31509 From: Decimus Iunius Silanus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31510 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31511 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31512 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31513 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31514 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31515 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31516 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31517 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31518 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31519 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31520 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31521 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31522 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31523 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31524 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31525 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31526 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31527 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31528 From: aoctaviaindagatrix Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Divergent viewpoints
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31529 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31530 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31531 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31532 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31533 From: Dana-Cooper Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31534 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31535 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: To the Candidates for Curule Aedile
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31536 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31537 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Still time to vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31538 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Woman warriors in the British Legions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31539 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31540 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Still time to vote (Addendum)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31541 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31542 From: Chantal Gaudiano Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Thank You, Marinus!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31543 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31544 From: Chris Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31545 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31546 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31547 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Thank You, Marinus!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31548 From: C. Fabia Livia Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: To the Candidates for Curule Aedile
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31549 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Woman warriors in the British Legions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31550 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31551 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Fwd: [Nova-Roma] Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31552 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31553 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31554 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31555 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Divergent viewpoints
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31556 From: CornMoraviusL@aol.com Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31557 From: CornMoraviusL@aol.com Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31558 From: FAC Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Candidates For Election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31559 From: FAC Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Polybius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31560 From: Chris Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31561 From: rory kirshner Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: FAUSTUS FOR PRAETOR - The Imperium of Respect
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31562 From: Marcus Iulius Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: EDICTVM AEDILICIVM VII - DESIGNATIO COLLEGIO MAGNAE MATRIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31563 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31564 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Advertising NR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31565 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Secret Society?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31566 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: EDICTVM AEDILICIVM VII - DESIGNATIO COLLEGIO MAGNAE MATRIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31567 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31568 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Oh, The blank stares I get.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31569 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31570 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Oh, The blank stares I get.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31571 From: Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31572 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31573 From: Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31574 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31575 From: Chris Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31576 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31577 From: wotansritter Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31578 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31579 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31580 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31581 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31582 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31583 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31584 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31585 From: Chantal Gaudiano Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Ancient Engineering Goodness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31586 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Voting in the Comitia Centuriata and Comitia Populi Tributa has End
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31587 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Re: Woman warriors in the British Legions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31588 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31589 From: Chantal Gaudiano Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31590 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Re: Taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31591 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Re: Woman warriors in the British Legions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31592 From: Quintus Fabius Maximus Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Re: Oh, The blank stares I get.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31593 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Re: Marcus Municus Choices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31594 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Yahoo down?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31595 From: aerdensrw Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Engineering Goodness!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31596 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Re: Ancient Engineering Goodness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31597 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Yahoo Down



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31422 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Polybius
Is that into or out of the sedation ward?

Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@c...> wrote:
> Salve Gai Popilli,
>
> gaiuspopilliuslaenas wrote:
>
> > Sometimes, I think Caesar amice, one must be nuts to run for
office ;-),
>
> You know I'm going to require all of the candidates to form a Conga
Line
> with me before I announce the election results, don't you?
>
> (OK, not really...)
>
> -- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31423 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Polybius
Salve -
On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:15 PM, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:

> What we polytheists are scared of is NR becoming a Christian majority,

No, Q.Fabius, it's what *you* and your buddies are scared of.
Q.Fabius, I have been a practicing Polytheist for over thirty years
now. Don't you *dare* presume to speak for all of the Polytheists of
NR!
I , and many others, are not in the least *scared* of our Christian
Citizens. They know this is *Rome*, not Byzantium, and that it would
be a damned silly Rome at that if Polytheism were proscribed or limited
in any way.

Vale
- Troianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31424 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Polybius
Salve Gnae Iuli,

Into. Definitely into.

-- Marinus

Gnaeus Iulius Caesar wrote:

> Is that into or out of the sedation ward?
>
> Caesar
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> <gawne@c...> wrote:
>
>>Salve Gai Popilli,
>>
>>gaiuspopilliuslaenas wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Sometimes, I think Caesar amice, one must be nuts to run for
>
> office ;-),
>
>>You know I'm going to require all of the candidates to form a Conga
>
> Line
>
>>with me before I announce the election results, don't you?
>>
>>(OK, not really...)
>>
>>-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31425 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Polybius
Salve Marinus -
On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:25 PM, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:

> You know I'm going to require all of the candidates to form a Conga
> Line
> with me before I announce the election results, don't you?
>
How does one do an online Conga line? Link up in a Chatroom?

- Troianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31426 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
HAHAHA....ROFL

Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
1/4" steel plate, a large bag of rivets, sound proof lagging, a
sledgehammer and an arc welder could produce the NR version of a Man
in the Iron mask? An essential part of Maior's election kit I'd say,
together with a pair of mittens to make typing difficult.

Now if she wore all that, the Libra's may feel more comfortable
accepting her onto their slate ;)

Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus
<hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
> Salve G.J. Caesar Cornelianus -
> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:
>
> > I'll have to patch up a few openings to trap that steam and July
4
> > here we come :)
>
> Somehow I seriously doubt Maior is going to let you patch closed
any of
> her openings....
>
> Vale
> - Troianus




Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31427 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
You gents *do* realize that with that kind of hardware she could easily
make *more* noise.

- Troianus
On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:40 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:

>
> HAHAHA....ROFL
>
> Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
> 1/4" steel plate, a large bag of rivets, sound proof lagging, a
> sledgehammer and an arc welder could produce the NR version of a Man
> in the Iron mask? An essential part of Maior's election kit I'd say,
> together with a pair of mittens to make typing difficult.
>
> Now if she wore all that, the Libra's may feel more comfortable
> accepting her onto their slate ;)
>
> Caesar
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus
> <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
>> Salve G.J. Caesar Cornelianus -
>> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:
>>
>>> I'll have to patch up a few openings to trap that steam and July
> 4
>>> here we come :)
>>
>> Somehow I seriously doubt Maior is going to let you patch closed
> any of
>> her openings....
>>
>> Vale
>> - Troianus
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31428 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Well there may be some muffled sueaks through the lagging, but the
rest could be dealt out with some axle grease :)

Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus
<hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
> You gents *do* realize that with that kind of hardware she could
easily
> make *more* noise.
>
> - Troianus
> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:40 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:
>
> >
> > HAHAHA....ROFL
> >
> > Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
> > 1/4" steel plate, a large bag of rivets, sound proof lagging, a
> > sledgehammer and an arc welder could produce the NR version of a
Man
> > in the Iron mask? An essential part of Maior's election kit I'd
say,
> > together with a pair of mittens to make typing difficult.
> >
> > Now if she wore all that, the Libra's may feel more comfortable
> > accepting her onto their slate ;)
> >
> > Caesar
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius
Troianus
> > <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
> >> Salve G.J. Caesar Cornelianus -
> >> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'll have to patch up a few openings to trap that steam and
July
> > 4
> >>> here we come :)
> >>
> >> Somehow I seriously doubt Maior is going to let you patch closed
> > any of
> >> her openings....
> >>
> >> Vale
> >> - Troianus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31429 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
sound proof it :), oh the mittens.....well we can squip those....special gloves that constrain the hand in a fist with not sharp corners so she can't get the keys on the keyboard...a nice perfect round ball...hey its that time a year lets get to work :)

Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
Well there may be some muffled sueaks through the lagging, but the
rest could be dealt out with some axle grease :)

Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus
<hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
> You gents *do* realize that with that kind of hardware she could
easily
> make *more* noise.
>
> - Troianus
> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:40 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:
>
> >
> > HAHAHA....ROFL
> >
> > Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
> > 1/4" steel plate, a large bag of rivets, sound proof lagging, a
> > sledgehammer and an arc welder could produce the NR version of a
Man
> > in the Iron mask? An essential part of Maior's election kit I'd
say,
> > together with a pair of mittens to make typing difficult.
> >
> > Now if she wore all that, the Libra's may feel more comfortable
> > accepting her onto their slate ;)
> >
> > Caesar
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius
Troianus
> > <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
> >> Salve G.J. Caesar Cornelianus -
> >> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'll have to patch up a few openings to trap that steam and
July
> > 4
> >>> here we come :)
> >>
> >> Somehow I seriously doubt Maior is going to let you patch closed
> > any of
> >> her openings....
> >>
> >> Vale
> >> - Troianus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >




Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31430 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Ah, that's assuming you could even get her into the bit of ironmongery
in the first place! Doubtful, that is - she's feisty! Best to check
your medical coverage before even planning the attempt.

Vale
- Troianus
On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:48 PM, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar wrote:

>
>
> Well there may be some muffled sueaks through the lagging, but the
> rest could be dealt out with some axle grease :)
>
> Caesar
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus
> <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
>> You gents *do* realize that with that kind of hardware she could
> easily
>> make *more* noise.
>>
>> - Troianus
>> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:40 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> HAHAHA....ROFL
>>>
>>> Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
>>> 1/4" steel plate, a large bag of rivets, sound proof lagging, a
>>> sledgehammer and an arc welder could produce the NR version of a
> Man
>>> in the Iron mask? An essential part of Maior's election kit I'd
> say,
>>> together with a pair of mittens to make typing difficult.
>>>
>>> Now if she wore all that, the Libra's may feel more comfortable
>>> accepting her onto their slate ;)
>>>
>>> Caesar
>>>
>>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius
> Troianus
>>> <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
>>>> Salve G.J. Caesar Cornelianus -
>>>> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'll have to patch up a few openings to trap that steam and
> July
>>> 4
>>>>> here we come :)
>>>>
>>>> Somehow I seriously doubt Maior is going to let you patch closed
>>> any of
>>>> her openings....
>>>>
>>>> Vale
>>>> - Troianus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>>>
>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Do you Yahoo!?
>>> Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good.
>>>
>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31431 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
I was gonna get all the shots first...I think she'd get a bit rabid upon the approach...hehe...who's got the tranquilizer darts :)

Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus <hermeticagnosis@...> wrote:Ah, that's assuming you could even get her into the bit of ironmongery
in the first place! Doubtful, that is - she's feisty! Best to check
your medical coverage before even planning the attempt.

Vale
- Troianus
On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:48 PM, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar wrote:

>
>
> Well there may be some muffled sueaks through the lagging, but the
> rest could be dealt out with some axle grease :)
>
> Caesar
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus
> <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
>> You gents *do* realize that with that kind of hardware she could
> easily
>> make *more* noise.
>>
>> - Troianus
>> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:40 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> HAHAHA....ROFL
>>>
>>> Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
>>> 1/4" steel plate, a large bag of rivets, sound proof lagging, a
>>> sledgehammer and an arc welder could produce the NR version of a
> Man
>>> in the Iron mask? An essential part of Maior's election kit I'd
> say,
>>> together with a pair of mittens to make typing difficult.
>>>
>>> Now if she wore all that, the Libra's may feel more comfortable
>>> accepting her onto their slate ;)
>>>
>>> Caesar
>>>
>>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius
> Troianus
>>> <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
>>>> Salve G.J. Caesar Cornelianus -
>>>> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'll have to patch up a few openings to trap that steam and
> July
>>> 4
>>>>> here we come :)
>>>>
>>>> Somehow I seriously doubt Maior is going to let you patch closed
>>> any of
>>>> her openings....
>>>>
>>>> Vale
>>>> - Troianus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>>>
>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Do you Yahoo!?
>>> Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good.
>>>
>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31432 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Salvete omnes;
I think all these masculine viri below need to devote themselves to
Magna Mater as her Eunuch priests!

Gnaeus Iulius, Cornelius, Troinus...step forward!!!

Strong women vote for Marca Arminia Maior Fabiana!
candidate for Tribune of the Plebs

VOTE LIBRA/MODERATI; DEFEAT THE BONI!

Fr. Apulus Caesar & Pomepia Minucia Tiberia Strabo
for Consules!!

M. Iulius Perusianus & L.Arminius Faustus for Praetors!!
character, scholarship, proven doers
LIBERAL!!!!!




- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus
<hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
> Ah, that's assuming you could even get her into the bit of
ironmongery
> in the first place! Doubtful, that is - she's feisty! Best to
check
> your medical coverage before even planning the attempt.
>
> Vale
> - Troianus
> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:48 PM, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Well there may be some muffled sueaks through the lagging, but the
> > rest could be dealt out with some axle grease :)
> >
> > Caesar
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius
Troianus
> > <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
> >> You gents *do* realize that with that kind of hardware she could
> > easily
> >> make *more* noise.
> >>
> >> - Troianus
> >> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:40 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> HAHAHA....ROFL
> >>>
> >>> Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
> >>> 1/4" steel plate, a large bag of rivets, sound proof lagging, a
> >>> sledgehammer and an arc welder could produce the NR version of a
> > Man
> >>> in the Iron mask? An essential part of Maior's election kit I'd
> > say,
> >>> together with a pair of mittens to make typing difficult.
> >>>
> >>> Now if she wore all that, the Libra's may feel more comfortable
> >>> accepting her onto their slate ;)
> >>>
> >>> Caesar
> >>>
> >>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius
> > Troianus
> >>> <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
> >>>> Salve G.J. Caesar Cornelianus -
> >>>> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus
wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I'll have to patch up a few openings to trap that steam and
> > July
> >>> 4
> >>>>> here we come :)
> >>>>
> >>>> Somehow I seriously doubt Maior is going to let you patch
closed
> >>> any of
> >>>> her openings....
> >>>>
> >>>> Vale
> >>>> - Troianus
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------
> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>
> >>> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> >>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
> >>>
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >>> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >>>
> >>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------
> >>> Do you Yahoo!?
> >>> Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good.
> >>>
> >>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31433 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
G. Equitius Cato Consules et Senatores S.P.D.

Salvete, illustrii virii.

I must absolutely echo the sentiments expressed by C. Moravius
Laureatus Amoricus regarding L. Modius Kaelus. We have been offered
the services of an intelligent, hard-working young citizen, and we
turn him away? Please, gentlemen, would you kindly explain the
rationale behind waiving the one age requirement yet retaining the
other? I mean no disrespect, gentlemen, but as this will have a
drastic impact on the res publica, I do think it is reasonable to ask
that you explain the reasons behind this decision.

Valete bene,

Cato

-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, CornMoraviusL@a... wrote:
> Salvete Consules et Senatores,
>
> In a message dated 21/12/04 16:13:06 GMT Standard Time,
> lafaustus@y... writes:
>
>
> > III. The Senate grants Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus a waiver
of the
> > minimum age requirement to stand for Diribitor.
> >
> > (passed)
> >
> > IV. The Senate grants L. Modius Kaelus a waiver of the minimum
age
> > requirement to stand for Magister Aranearius (webmaster).
> >
> > (failed)
> >
> >
>
> I am confused. Why exactly Kaelus was not granted the "priviledge"
to work
> for the Republic?
> There used to be comments by senatores on the reasons why one voted
for or
> against a proposal. This time around only dry results...
>
> It is probably too late to put a case forward but let me tell you
something :
> Kaelus has been working only for a few weeks in the censorial
cohors but it
> was long enough for me to find him a very astute and dedicated
person who not
> only is interested in Roma Antiqua but has also a real desire to
serve Nova
> Roma.
>
> I cannot come to terms that we could waive age requirements for one
person
> yet impose them on another to stand for office.
>
> Tell me senatores, who among you would like the job of curator
Aranearius?
> Nobody? Then let Kaelus stand and let him put his energy to good
use!
> And if there is any good reason why this happened, please let us
all know,
> because frankly, just now, I am pretty disgusted that we should
turn down people
> who want to work!!!
>
> Optime Vale
>
> C. Moravius Laureatus Armoricus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31434 From: CornMoraviusL@aol.com Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Quid Novi - pdf format
Ave Troi,

Please try the link below and choose either version, word or pdf...

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Britannia-Provincia/files/INTER%20ALIA/

Vale

Laureatus


In a message dated 20/12/04 05:25:00 GMT Standard Time,
hermeticagnosis@... writes:


> Salve Laureatus -
>
> I'm getting a "Document Not Found" page for the link you have posted,
> below.
>
> Vale
> - Troianus
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31435 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
See guys? Feisty!
No, I think you'd be well advised to steer clear of her. Do you really
want to risk your nads on the basis of some presumed efficacy of a
tranquilizer dart? She'd probably have taken the counteragent ahead of
time, and have the scalpel concealed - she *knows* these sorts of
things!

- Troi.
On Dec 21, 2004, at 4:05 PM, Maior wrote:

>
>
> Salvete omnes;
> I think all these masculine viri below need to devote themselves to
> Magna Mater as her Eunuch priests!
>
> Gnaeus Iulius, Cornelius, Troinus...step forward!!!
>
> Strong women vote for Marca Arminia Maior Fabiana!
> candidate for Tribune of the Plebs
>
> VOTE LIBRA/MODERATI; DEFEAT THE BONI!
>
> Fr. Apulus Caesar & Pomepia Minucia Tiberia Strabo
> for Consules!!
>
> M. Iulius Perusianus & L.Arminius Faustus for Praetors!!
> character, scholarship, proven doers
> LIBERAL!!!!!
>
>
>
>
> - In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus
> <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
>> Ah, that's assuming you could even get her into the bit of
> ironmongery
>> in the first place! Doubtful, that is - she's feisty! Best to
> check
>> your medical coverage before even planning the attempt.
>>
>> Vale
>> - Troianus
>> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:48 PM, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Well there may be some muffled sueaks through the lagging, but the
>>> rest could be dealt out with some axle grease :)
>>>
>>> Caesar
>>>
>>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius
> Troianus
>>> <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
>>>> You gents *do* realize that with that kind of hardware she could
>>> easily
>>>> make *more* noise.
>>>>
>>>> - Troianus
>>>> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:40 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> HAHAHA....ROFL
>>>>>
>>>>> Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
>>>>> 1/4" steel plate, a large bag of rivets, sound proof lagging, a
>>>>> sledgehammer and an arc welder could produce the NR version of a
>>> Man
>>>>> in the Iron mask? An essential part of Maior's election kit I'd
>>> say,
>>>>> together with a pair of mittens to make typing difficult.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now if she wore all that, the Libra's may feel more comfortable
>>>>> accepting her onto their slate ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> Caesar
>>>>>
>>>>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius
>>> Troianus
>>>>> <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
>>>>>> Salve G.J. Caesar Cornelianus -
>>>>>> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll have to patch up a few openings to trap that steam and
>>> July
>>>>> 4
>>>>>>> here we come :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Somehow I seriously doubt Maior is going to let you patch
> closed
>>>>> any of
>>>>>> her openings....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vale
>>>>>> - Troianus
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>
>>>>> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>>>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>>>> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>>> Service.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>> Do you Yahoo!?
>>>>> Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good.
>>>>>
>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31436 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Marcus Municus Choices
Salve Quinte Fabi, et salvete Quirites,

QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:

> The Honored Consul of last year, Gnaeus Equitus Marinus.
> Who is running un opposed.

Whose fault is that?

[...]

> If Strabo was truely
> Roman, she would restart the cursus as Quaestor and rework herself up.

Name one Roman who did that.

> The rest of Minucius choices are friends of his. So you can infer from that
> what you want.

I'd rather by far be considered a friend of Marcus Minucius Audens.
He's a decent and good man who has done more for Nova Roma than anyone
currently running for office, including me.

> People of Nova Roma! Don't be sheep. Don't assume because someone tells you
> they are great, they are.

We learned that lesson about you a long time ago Fabius. But thanks for
reminding the Quirites.

> You can be dedicated to Nova Roma for the wrong reasons, and still be
> dedicated. It means nothing.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus

Couldn't have said it better myself.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31437 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Isn't she so generous...I'm perfectly comfortable with my masculinity thank you very much...But Maior I am a non-practitioner...however could I serve? Yes Troianus I see...about what I expected I was wondering when she was gonna jump in

PS: I am not about to make any ummm.....contributions.... :)

Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus <hermeticagnosis@...> wrote:
See guys? Feisty!
No, I think you'd be well advised to steer clear of her. Do you really
want to risk your nads on the basis of some presumed efficacy of a
tranquilizer dart? She'd probably have taken the counteragent ahead of
time, and have the scalpel concealed - she *knows* these sorts of
things!

- Troi.
On Dec 21, 2004, at 4:05 PM, Maior wrote:

>
>
> Salvete omnes;
> I think all these masculine viri below need to devote themselves to
> Magna Mater as her Eunuch priests!
>
> Gnaeus Iulius, Cornelius, Troinus...step forward!!!
>
> Strong women vote for Marca Arminia Maior Fabiana!
> candidate for Tribune of the Plebs
>
> VOTE LIBRA/MODERATI; DEFEAT THE BONI!
>
> Fr. Apulus Caesar & Pomepia Minucia Tiberia Strabo
> for Consules!!
>
> M. Iulius Perusianus & L.Arminius Faustus for Praetors!!
> character, scholarship, proven doers
> LIBERAL!!!!!
>
>
>
>
> - In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus
> <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
>> Ah, that's assuming you could even get her into the bit of
> ironmongery
>> in the first place! Doubtful, that is - she's feisty! Best to
> check
>> your medical coverage before even planning the attempt.
>>
>> Vale
>> - Troianus
>> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:48 PM, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Well there may be some muffled sueaks through the lagging, but the
>>> rest could be dealt out with some axle grease :)
>>>
>>> Caesar
>>>
>>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius
> Troianus
>>> <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
>>>> You gents *do* realize that with that kind of hardware she could
>>> easily
>>>> make *more* noise.
>>>>
>>>> - Troianus
>>>> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:40 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> HAHAHA....ROFL
>>>>>
>>>>> Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
>>>>> 1/4" steel plate, a large bag of rivets, sound proof lagging, a
>>>>> sledgehammer and an arc welder could produce the NR version of a
>>> Man
>>>>> in the Iron mask? An essential part of Maior's election kit I'd
>>> say,
>>>>> together with a pair of mittens to make typing difficult.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now if she wore all that, the Libra's may feel more comfortable
>>>>> accepting her onto their slate ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> Caesar
>>>>>
>>>>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius
>>> Troianus
>>>>> <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
>>>>>> Salve G.J. Caesar Cornelianus -
>>>>>> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll have to patch up a few openings to trap that steam and
>>> July
>>>>> 4
>>>>>>> here we come :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Somehow I seriously doubt Maior is going to let you patch
> closed
>>>>> any of
>>>>>> her openings....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vale
>>>>>> - Troianus
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>
>>>>> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>>>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>>>> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>>> Service.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>> Do you Yahoo!?
>>>>> Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good.
>>>>>
>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31438 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Divergent viewpoints
Salve Quinte Fabi, et salvete omnes,

QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:

> You cannot have a factio that has divergent viewpoints, and expect it to
> survive.

First of all, the Libra are not a factio, we're an alliance. Secondly,
I don't expect the Alliance to last. We've come together this year to
promote a shared view of Nova Roma. In future years I expect we'll
drift apart as our own different interests draw us one way and the
other. I hope we'll all remain friends, and I expect we'll vote
together more often than we divide, but as diverse as we are this is
bound to be an ephemeral thing.

There are many people in Nova Roma I consider my political allies who
are not members of the Libra Alliance. I didn't abandon them when I
decided to join the Libra. I remain their allies too, and I would not
stand for somebody claiming leadership in the Libra telling me to stand
against any such people.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31439 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Divergent viewpoints
In a message dated 12/21/04 12:29:04 PM Pacific Standard Time,
ksterne@... writes:

> Unfortunately, QFM and Drusus have been so loud so often
> that many people *do* think of being abusive as being the Boni Way.
> Is this how you want to be seen?

Wow that's amusing coming from a blowhard like you.

I was just sitting back, watching the election writing notes for my book
seeing what happens when you let left-wingers have any opposition and guess what?
You have to attack us anyway? What's up with that, guys? That seems that
your factio cannot function unless it has enemy. So if the voters reject you,
does that mean that the people will become your enemy? That should be an
interesting outcome.

Once again I try to stay out, and I'm sucked back in!!!

The Boni were an outgrowth of the Sullan faction who wanted to make Nova Roma
more like old Rome of the Republican Period. Before the dynasists. The
shrill tone of the message was more about exasperation. Least that was the way I
saw it.

This of course gives rise to many a counter diction. Mostly revolving
around the internet.
The internet is the technology that allows NR to be possible. I simply see
it as no different as the quill, scroll, post horse and Trireme of
communication. Except for internet stalking, the internet should stay in the back ground.

NR has profited by technocrats who have joined, but has suffered when they
say "WE CAN MAKE IT BETTER!"
Republican Rome was not perfect. Gods not by a long shot. But to streamline
the clumsy operation into an efficient one misses the point here. We want
the clumsy operation.
Why else are we here?

Q. Fabius Maximus




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31440 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Faction Smacktion I have arrived!!!!!!!!!!!
Salve Tiberi Galeri,

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus wrote:

> I have been called names on the main list by no other
> that a Consul of Nova Roma. ( an a friend of mine no less)

The friendship holds, and you'll notice I still trust you to be my
Legate. But I'm what Sam Rayburn called an honest politician. I'll
drink your whisky, eat your food, stay out late reminiscing about old
times with you, and still vote against your idea the next day if I think
your idea is wrong. I expect the same of you.

Now start practicing the Conga.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31441 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Salve - GJC Cornelianus
On Dec 21, 2004, at 4:35 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:
> Isn't she so generous...I'm perfectly comfortable with my masculinity
> thank you very much...

Perhaps it would be a good idea then *not* to plot to put her into an
iron box! ;-) Then you can be assured of retaining all of your various
and sundry parts.

> But Maior I am a non-practitioner...however could I serve?

Very generous of you to ask, but be careful: This could be construed as
volunteering to become a Eunuch! I suppose you could be a cupbearer or
something. I mean, you just have to stand there holding a cup - how
much belief could that require?

> Yes Troianus I see...about what I expected I was wondering when she
> was gonna jump in
>
Now, now, you can hardly expect to be talking about the Lady so much
and have her *not* interject, now can you?
I mean, how long would you or I sit on the sidelines while someone
discussed putting either of us into an iron box? I know I would have
jumped in long ago - if someone's designing an iron box for me, I'm
going to insist it have facilities and climate control among other
things.....

> PS: I am not about to make any ummm.....contributions.... :)

Then we'd best drop this whole line of inquiry, lest the
"contributions" become deemed not voluntary...

Besides, I have some work that needs doing.
Been fun though!

Vale et valete
- Troianus, not a Eunuch and hoping to
remain that way...
>
> Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus <hermeticagnosis@...>
> wrote:
> See guys? Feisty!
> No, I think you'd be well advised to steer clear of her. Do you really
> want to risk your nads on the basis of some presumed efficacy of a
> tranquilizer dart? She'd probably have taken the counteragent ahead of
> time, and have the scalpel concealed - she *knows* these sorts of
> things!
>
> - Troi.
> On Dec 21, 2004, at 4:05 PM, Maior wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Salvete omnes;
>> I think all these masculine viri below need to devote themselves to
>> Magna Mater as her Eunuch priests!
>>
>> Gnaeus Iulius, Cornelius, Troinus...step forward!!!
>>
>> Strong women vote for Marca Arminia Maior Fabiana!
>> candidate for Tribune of the Plebs
>>
>> VOTE LIBRA/MODERATI; DEFEAT THE BONI!
>>
>> Fr. Apulus Caesar & Pomepia Minucia Tiberia Strabo
>> for Consules!!
>>
>> M. Iulius Perusianus & L.Arminius Faustus for Praetors!!
>> character, scholarship, proven doers
>> LIBERAL!!!!!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> - In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus
>> <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
>>> Ah, that's assuming you could even get her into the bit of
>> ironmongery
>>> in the first place! Doubtful, that is - she's feisty! Best to
>> check
>>> your medical coverage before even planning the attempt.
>>>
>>> Vale
>>> - Troianus
>>> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:48 PM, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well there may be some muffled sueaks through the lagging, but the
>>>> rest could be dealt out with some axle grease :)
>>>>
>>>> Caesar
>>>>
>>>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius
>> Troianus
>>>> <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
>>>>> You gents *do* realize that with that kind of hardware she could
>>>> easily
>>>>> make *more* noise.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Troianus
>>>>> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:40 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HAHAHA....ROFL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
>>>>>> 1/4" steel plate, a large bag of rivets, sound proof lagging, a
>>>>>> sledgehammer and an arc welder could produce the NR version of a
>>>> Man
>>>>>> in the Iron mask? An essential part of Maior's election kit I'd
>>>> say,
>>>>>> together with a pair of mittens to make typing difficult.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now if she wore all that, the Libra's may feel more comfortable
>>>>>> accepting her onto their slate ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Caesar
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius
>>>> Troianus
>>>>>> <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
>>>>>>> Salve G.J. Caesar Cornelianus -
>>>>>>> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll have to patch up a few openings to trap that steam and
>>>> July
>>>>>> 4
>>>>>>>> here we come :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Somehow I seriously doubt Maior is going to let you patch
>> closed
>>>>>> any of
>>>>>>> her openings....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Vale
>>>>>>> - Troianus
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>>>>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>>>>> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>>>> Service.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>>> Do you Yahoo!?
>>>>>> Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31442 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Divergent viewpoints
In a message dated 12/21/04 1:43:30 PM Pacific Standard Time,
gawne@... writes:

> First of all, the Libra are not a factio, we're an alliance.

You say tamato I say tomato, its the people who will decide.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31443 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Divergent viewpoints
Salve Troianus,

<Declare your independence, not just for this campaign (which is how <it is being seen), but for real, and denounce such a dispicable <outlook for the vile and unproductive thing that it is.

Personally I am seeing both sides of these endless arguments as being vile and unproductive.

Vale,

Diana


Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus <hermeticagnosis@...> wrote:
Salvete

On Dec 21, 2004, at 2:03 PM, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:

> At least they told it to you straight until it became against the law
> to so..

Since the only speech that is against the law is defamatory and/or
obscene, this appears to be an admission that "the Boni" approach is
much as Maior has been making it out to be, at least in Q.Fabius'
opinion.

Metellus, Laenas and you others, take note, and formally renounce any
Boni affilliation in order to distance yourself from such a view.
"Guilt by association" is wrong, but people have a tendency to do it
anyway, and you really don't want to be associated with such an
outlook.

Note also, Laenas et al, that telling "it straight" in an illegal way
is what Q.Fabius thinks of as the Boni Way. He apparently doesn't
consider your reasoned approach, using fact and argument, to be "Boni"
in some way. Unfortunately, QFM and Drusus have been so loud so often
that many people *do* think of being abusive as being the Boni Way. Is
this how you want to be seen?


Valete
- S E M Troianus


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Jazz up your holiday email with celebrity designs. Learn more.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31444 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Divergent viewpoints
Salvete
>
> gawne@... writes:
>> First of all, the Libra are not a factio, we're an alliance.

On Dec 21, 2004, at 5:01 PM, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
> You say tamato I say tomato, its the people who will decide.

The people will decide if it's an alliance or a factio?
Is this an election or a vocabulary quiz, and for that matter since
when were definitions voted on anyway?
It either fits the definition or it doesn't.

Vale
- Troianus
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31445 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Faction Smacktion I have arrived!!!!!!!!!!!
---Salve Marinus Consul:

Ahh, well........I hate to say this, and maybe I need to get a life,
but.....well, uhh.....

I don't know how to do the Conga...

Sorry about that...

Pompeia




In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@c...>
wrote:
> Salve Tiberi Galeri,
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus wrote:
>
> > I have been called names on the main list by no other
> > that a Consul of Nova Roma. ( an a friend of mine no less)
>
> The friendship holds, and you'll notice I still trust you to be my
> Legate. But I'm what Sam Rayburn called an honest politician.
I'll
> drink your whisky, eat your food, stay out late reminiscing about
old
> times with you, and still vote against your idea the next day if I
think
> your idea is wrong. I expect the same of you.
>
> Now start practicing the Conga.
>
> Vale,
>
> -- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31446 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: The Boni remain as a group. was Re: [Nova-Roma] Divergent viewpoints
Salva Diana et salvete omnes -

Yes Diana, but I notice you still haven't renounced your Boni
membership.
If that organization were truly "defunct" then it would cost you
nothing to do so - after all, what possible harm could there be in
"quitting" a group that no longer exists?
Yet those who protest the loudest that the Boni are "defunct" all
refuse to drop their claim, their identity, as members. Now, why
cling to a membership if there's no longer a group to be a member of?
The answer is obvious: The Boni remain. Not just the people, but the
group, as a group. Perhaps quiescent on their list, or perhaps moved
to another list, but still a group and a political group at that.
Hence the refusal to give up identifying themselves as Boni.
When known members *all* are saying "Yes, I'm a Bonus but the Boni
don't exist as a group...." - that is, when a *group* of people are all
identifying as members yet claiming there is no group - can it really
be believed?

Valete
- S E M Troianus
Moderati Candidate for Quaestor


On Dec 21, 2004, at 5:02 PM, Diana Aventina wrote:

>
> Salve Troianus,
>
> <Declare your independence, not just for this campaign (which is how
> <it is being seen), but for real, and denounce such a dispicable
> <outlook for the vile and unproductive thing that it is.
>
> Personally I am seeing both sides of these endless arguments as being
> vile and unproductive.
>
> Vale,
>
> Diana
>
>
> Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus <hermeticagnosis@...>
> wrote:
> Salvete
>
> On Dec 21, 2004, at 2:03 PM, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
>
>> At least they told it to you straight until it became against the law
>> to so..
>
> Since the only speech that is against the law is defamatory and/or
> obscene, this appears to be an admission that "the Boni" approach is
> much as Maior has been making it out to be, at least in Q.Fabius'
> opinion.
>
> Metellus, Laenas and you others, take note, and formally renounce any
> Boni affilliation in order to distance yourself from such a view.
> "Guilt by association" is wrong, but people have a tendency to do it
> anyway, and you really don't want to be associated with such an
> outlook.
>
> Note also, Laenas et al, that telling "it straight" in an illegal way
> is what Q.Fabius thinks of as the Boni Way. He apparently doesn't
> consider your reasoned approach, using fact and argument, to be "Boni"
> in some way. Unfortunately, QFM and Drusus have been so loud so often
> that many people *do* think of being abusive as being the Boni Way. Is
> this how you want to be seen?
>
>
> Valete
> - S E M Troianus
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Jazz up your holiday email with celebrity designs. Learn more.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31447 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Divergent viewpoints
In a message dated 12/21/04 2:10:41 PM Pacific Standard Time,
dianaaventina@... writes:

> Note also, Laenas et al, that telling "it straight" in an illegal way
> is what Q.Fabius thinks of as the Boni Way. He apparently doesn't
> consider your reasoned approach, using fact and argument, to be "Boni"
> in some way. Unfortunately, QFM and Drusus have been so loud so often
> that many people *do* think of being abusive as being the Boni Way. Is
> this how you want to be seen?
>

You know, we only called people names who deserved it. narrow minded people
who didn't like the way nova roma was when they joined. people who didn't
bother with reading the constitution or wanted to interpret it the way they
wanted.

last time I looked freedom speech meant i could call you exactly what i
thought of you. but you exaggerate. there is no freedom of speech here. there is
your freedom of speech, your narrow interpretation of the same.

if i call you an embezzler in public that would be actionable if it wasn't
true. it doesn't matter if it was and the people already knew it. if i call
you an embezzler in private, you can do nothing , except refuse to accept my
e-mails.
The damage comes from public perception so if you are spreading mis and half
truths about the boni are you not guilty of the same? should i not sue you
for misrepresenting my organization to the people? except i won't. i'm sure
the people see through your flimsy subterfuge, and your fear, otherwise why
are you saying such things?
the boni has always been pretty straight forward in what was wanted in NR and
we have never been silent about it.

Fabius


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31448 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
quite agreed Troianus...it has been fun...cup bearer huhmph....my poor eyes....how dare you subject me to such a sight :)

Cornelianus


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31449 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
---Salvete!

Now this brings me down memory lane...with this description of
a 'new' look for Maior and all the metal trappings, I'm reminded of
an old Ozzie/Sabbath tune, called Iron Man...but let's improvise,
shall we?

I.... AMMMMM.... IROOONNNN.... TRIBUNNNNEE !!!
(sounds of electric guitar chords)

*or*

if we wanted to be gender friendly...

I.....AMMMMM....IRONNNN....TRIBUNNNAAAAAA!!!
(sounds of electric guitar chords)

Yeah, you boys better be careful, ya hear?
Think Hortensia and Agrippina the Elder combined...

And, if you think you are going to render biological donations to
the Magna Mater Fund and appear on the Benefactor's list, you've
obviously missed a staff meeting or two......nice *historic* try
though fellas :), really.

<g> Po





In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus
<hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
> You gents *do* realize that with that kind of hardware she could
easily
> make *more* noise.
>
> - Troianus
> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:40 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:
>
> >
> > HAHAHA....ROFL
> >
> > Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
> > 1/4" steel plate, a large bag of rivets, sound proof lagging, a
> > sledgehammer and an arc welder could produce the NR version of a
Man
> > in the Iron mask? An essential part of Maior's election kit I'd
say,
> > together with a pair of mittens to make typing difficult.
> >
> > Now if she wore all that, the Libra's may feel more comfortable
> > accepting her onto their slate ;)
> >
> > Caesar
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius
Troianus
> > <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
> >> Salve G.J. Caesar Cornelianus -
> >> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus
wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'll have to patch up a few openings to trap that steam and
July
> > 4
> >>> here we come :)
> >>
> >> Somehow I seriously doubt Maior is going to let you patch closed
> > any of
> >> her openings....
> >>
> >> Vale
> >> - Troianus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31450 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
quite agreed Troianus...it has been fun...cup bearer huhmph....my poor eyes....how dare you subject me to such a sight :)

Cornelianus



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! � Get yours free!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31451 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
good tune...I always preferred The Wizard...

pompeia_minucia_tiberia <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
---Salvete!

Now this brings me down memory lane...with this description of
a 'new' look for Maior and all the metal trappings, I'm reminded of
an old Ozzie/Sabbath tune, called Iron Man...but let's improvise,
shall we?

I.... AMMMMM.... IROOONNNN.... TRIBUNNNNEE !!!
(sounds of electric guitar chords)

*or*

if we wanted to be gender friendly...

I.....AMMMMM....IRONNNN....TRIBUNNNAAAAAA!!!
(sounds of electric guitar chords)

Yeah, you boys better be careful, ya hear?
Think Hortensia and Agrippina the Elder combined...

And, if you think you are going to render biological donations to
the Magna Mater Fund and appear on the Benefactor's list, you've
obviously missed a staff meeting or two......nice *historic* try
though fellas :), really.

<g> Po





In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus
<hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
> You gents *do* realize that with that kind of hardware she could
easily
> make *more* noise.
>
> - Troianus
> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:40 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:
>
> >
> > HAHAHA....ROFL
> >
> > Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
> > 1/4" steel plate, a large bag of rivets, sound proof lagging, a
> > sledgehammer and an arc welder could produce the NR version of a
Man
> > in the Iron mask? An essential part of Maior's election kit I'd
say,
> > together with a pair of mittens to make typing difficult.
> >
> > Now if she wore all that, the Libra's may feel more comfortable
> > accepting her onto their slate ;)
> >
> > Caesar
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius
Troianus
> > <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
> >> Salve G.J. Caesar Cornelianus -
> >> On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus
wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'll have to patch up a few openings to trap that steam and
July
> > 4
> >>> here we come :)
> >>
> >> Somehow I seriously doubt Maior is going to let you patch closed
> > any of
> >> her openings....
> >>
> >> Vale
> >> - Troianus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >




Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31452 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Faction Smacktion I have arrived!!!!!!!!!!!
pompeia_minucia_tiberia wrote:

> I don't know how to do the Conga...

You and Galerius can practice together. If you're feeling especially
feisty you can teach him to Tango once you've got the Conga figured out.

-- Marinus
Museaus of Terpsichore
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31453 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Faction Smacktion I have arrived!!!!!!!!!!!
I was in a tango class and my partner said, with a fab accent:
I hammm Argentineeean......
heaven...:)
Marca Arminia
tango Po tango!!
>
> You and Galerius can practice together. If you're feeling
especially
> feisty you can teach him to Tango once you've got the Conga figured
out.
>
> -- Marinus
> Museaus of Terpsichore
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31454 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Faction Smacktion I have arrived!!!!!!!!!!!
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes.

I can't dance, but Nichomachus can do a mean limbo.

Valete,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> I was in a tango class and my partner said, with a fab accent:
> I hammm Argentineeean......
> heaven...:)
> Marca Arminia
> tango Po tango!!
> >
> > You and Galerius can practice together. If you're feeling
> especially
> > feisty you can teach him to Tango once you've got the Conga
figured
> out.
> >
> > -- Marinus
> > Museaus of Terpsichore
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31455 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Faction Smacktion I have arrived!!!!!!!!!!!
gaiusequitiuscato wrote:

> I can't dance, but Nichomachus can do a mean limbo.

Good. He'll pick up the Conga in no time. We'll just strap you into a
saddlebag.

Io Saturnalia!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31456 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Faction Smacktion I have arrived!!!!!!!!!!!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <>
gaiusequitiuscato wrote:
>
> > I can't dance, but Nichomachus can do a mean limbo.
>
> Good. He'll pick up the Conga in no time. We'll just strap you
into a
> saddlebag.
hey we can stuff Those Gnaei into the hind end as well;-)
Io Saturnalia
tango, baby tango, Maior
>
> Io Saturnalia!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31457 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Divergent viewpoints
G. Equitius Cato Q. Fabio Maximo S.P.D.

Salve, Quintus Maximus.

I'm confused here. You wrote:


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@a... wrote:

> You know, we only called people names who deserved it. narrow
minded people who didn't like the way nova roma was when they
joined. people who didn't bother with reading the constitution or
wanted to interpret it the way they wanted.
>
> last time I looked freedom speech meant i could call you exactly
what i thought of you. but you exaggerate. there is no freedom of
speech here. there is your freedom of speech, your narrow
interpretation of the same.



CATO: Now Quintus Maximus, you cannot have it both ways. Either
freedom of speech INCLUDES those who have different interpretations
of our Constitution, or it does not. If it does not, then it is not
truly freedom of speech, is it? It's merely being told to tow a
party line.

So if my interpretation differs from yours, and I say so, then
I "deserved" to be "called names"? I "deserved" to be attacked and
vilified because I offered a different opinion? And I am not worthy
of being a part of "your" Nova Roma? This is your idea of freedom
of speech?

Nova Roma does not belng to any one individual; she does not belong
to any one group of people; she belongs to ALL of us, the citizens.
She is not a private toy to be played with, a bauble that is useful
only when it is placed exactly where *you* want it on display. She
does not even belong to the Pater Patriae; she has her own life, and
her citizens are her blood and bones and sinews. All her citizens.

I am a Moderatus precisely because I will *not* be dictated to; I
stand under the laws and Constitution of Nova Roma as a free
citizen. You are welcome to your interpretation, and I am welcome
to mine.

You act as if Nova Roma is a golden casket filled with gems to which
you alone have the key. She *is* a golden casket filled with gems --
- the great Virtues and romanitas of the ancients--- but the Pater
Patriae have unlocked that casket once and for all time, and it
cannot be re-locked. The gems are in the hearts and minds and hands
of her citizens. Vox populi vox dei.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31458 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Cato Gets Crankier
A. Apollónius Cordus C. Equitió Catóní amícó
omnibusque sal.

> ... Let the
> People decide. Vox populi vox dei.

Et haec est vóx Mysterónium... O O


(Those of you who are unfamiliar with either Latin or
Captain Scarlet - don't worry about it.)





___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31459 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Cato Gets Crankier
A. Apollónius Cordus C. Minució Scaevolae amícó
omnibusque sal.

Cató wrote:

> > I think all this stuff is quite inappropriate
> considering the
> > SUBJECT LINE. You dolts! I'm CRANKY, get it?
> There is no time for
> > happy little songs or ---- <DING!> OOOOH! The
> fries are done!
> > Woohoo!
>
> Ah, a perfect example of MBSO (Management By Shiny
> Object). Oooh,
> pretty...

If Cató has been eating shiny fries, it's no wonder
he's feeling poorly.





___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31460 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Cato Gets Crankier
>
> > ... Let the
> > People decide. Vox populi vox dei.
>
> Et haec est vóx Mysterónium... O O
>
>
> (Those of you who are unfamiliar with either Latin or
> Captain Scarlet - don't worry about it.)
>
>
I know Dr. Who- I'd come up and see his Tardis any day;-)

Maior
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31461 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Polybius
Salve Consul

Now that sounds like a PARTY I could join! : )

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Still your friend??? : (

----- Original Message -----
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus<mailto:gawne@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Polybius


Salve Gai Popilli,

gaiuspopilliuslaenas wrote:

> Sometimes, I think Caesar amice, one must be nuts to run for office ;-),

You know I'm going to require all of the candidates to form a Conga Line
with me before I announce the election results, don't you?

(OK, not really...)

-- Marinus

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=129lmcurl/M=298184.5639630.6699735.3001176/D=groups/S=1705313712:HM/EXP=1103747491/A=2495208/R=0/SIG=11egg01lg/*http://www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60188914>




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/>

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31462 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
A. Apollónius Cordus Cn Equitió Marínó amícó
omnibusque sal.

Thanks for showing us these responses. May I orate
briefly?

This selection of responses suggests an epidemic of
confusion and muddle-headedness in our patrés - no
doubt a temporary plague caused by being convened at
short notice. The reasons of those who voted 'no' seem
to fall into three camps.

The first, containing two of the six speeches which
give reasons (I don't count Probus Macedonicus'
response, since it's impossible to know what his "some
concerns" are and into which group they fall), is the
camp of 'I don't know enough about the guy to
authorize him for this job'. That's a very reasonable
and sensible position, though it is a shame these
senátórés were unable to actually talk to Kaelus in
order to get to know him better.

One other senátor gives as a reason not any
consideration of the merits of the fellow in question
but the fact that the position he hopes to be elected
to ought not to exist. This is rather baffling. The
position does exist, and until it ceases to exist it
must be filled. Rejecting a certain candidate for the
post does not make the post vanish, nor does allowing
him to stand for election make it any more difficult
to abolish the job at a later date. All it achieves is
that the job is not being done by anyone. The senate's
job when considering applications for waivers is not
to decide whether the office the applicant wants ought
to exist, it is to consider whether the applicant
deserves to be allowed to stand for the office which
he wants to stand for. One does not expect a judge to
say 'I am going to let this murderer go free because I
think murder ought to be legal'. That's not the
decision the judge is there to make.

The remaining three are along the lines of 'the law
sets a minimum age and so we should stick to it or
else change the law'. This sounds very sane, but it
ignores the fact that the law also allows that
requirement of age to be waived at the discretion of
the senate. It does not say 'this is the minimum age
and there may be no exceptions'. It says 'this is the
minimum age but the senate may make exceptions if it
thinks proper' (not a direct quotation, but
indisputably the gist).

So those who say 'we should either have a strict
minimum age or none at all', while of course entitled
to that opinion, are defying the will of the comitia
which enacted the law in the first place. The populus
voted, and what the populus said is 'we want a minimum
age to be set, but we also want the senate to look at
each case individually and allow exceptions if
appropriate'. These senátórés are saying 'no, we will
not do what the law asks us to do: we will not
consider this man on his individual merits, as the
populus has asked us to. We will ignore the fact that
the populus has made absolutely clear its desire for
exemptions to be granted in deserving cases; we prefer
to imagine that the law allows for no exemptions at
all.'

Written law, as legal thinkers since Plato have
pointed out, is a blunt instrument - it is by nature
general and vague, and it is incapable of taking into
account the subtle details of real life. Thus those
who enforce the written law have a certain degree of
discretion in that enforcement, so that they may adapt
the general rule to the particular circumstance. This
is all the more true in this case, since the law in
question specifically charges the senate with the duty
of making such decisions. It *asks* the senate to
consider the merits of the individual and to decide
whether to make an exception to the rule. For any
senátor to refuse to do that is nothing more than a
dereliction of duty.

These three senátórés and also the one who rejected
the candidate because of objections about the office
(and I haven't made any attempt to check which
senátórés are the authors of these four votes because
it makes no difference) have done a gross disservice
to Modius Kaelus, who had every right to expect to be
considered on his own merits and not to be dismissed
because of considerations which are nothing to do with
the issue; and they have done a gross disservice to
the whole populus, which in good faith entrusted them
with an important duty and had every right to expect
this duty to be performed.

Perhaps, as some of these senátórés have suggested,
the relevant law ought indeed to be revised. Perhaps
it ought to be revised in order to remove the duty of
considering waivers from the senate, which clearly has
no interest in doing as the populus asks of it, and to
give this duty to someone else.





___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31463 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: And if you all would calm down?
Esteemed Libras, to whom my sympathy clearly goes (how couldn't it, I'm a
zodiacal Libra after all) but I'm not a member of, and you oh so independent
candidates on the other side...

...Do you realize that in the last 24 hours you dropped on this list 132
messages and in the last 4 hours only you managed to send 63 messages, one
message every 4 minutes??? What about if you ALL could calm down a bit?

And especially you, Julius Caesar, with 21 messages and you, Troianus, with
18 (so you see I do not pick on any specific side)... hell, give us a break
(and I'm sure one will get upset at the latter line and the other will
realize the good in it)!

In the last 24 hours we got 132 messages coming from just about 20 people
and most of them really dropped less than 5... this is a chatroom volume,
not a mailing list.

If you (all the ones who post more than 10 mails a day, not jut the two
above) really can't help it, give the whole population a time and server on
irc, make a nova roma channel and talk it out, showing you rethorical kill,
but hell, do not force the other 200 people on this list to drown in this
tidal wave of words, it doesn't help either side, really.

As an aletrnative, drop simply a mail saying "what X has just said is
bullshit, do not consider it", because that's what most of you is just
saying regarding a previos posts, but at least the other people on this
mailing list would have a much easier time sorting out and deleting posts,
rather than having to read lines an dlines (often pointlessly quoted) to get
the point that can be so brillantly expressed in thehalf line reported
above.

Incidentally, in the time it took to write this little mail, six more
messages hit my mailbox... as Charlie Brown would say.. good grief. I just
know tomorrow morning I shall find another 150 messages waiting to be
read...

Vale

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
The one who dropped less than 10 mails in the whole electoral campaign and
that , with all good will, is unnerved to be just barely able to keep up
with such volumes of mass mailing.


Aedilis Urbis
PF Constantinia
Candidate for Tribunus Plebis

--
Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f

Sponsor:
Libri e CD musicali nuovi con sconti dal 60 all'80%!
Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=814&d=20041222
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31464 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: New Nova Roman Oath of Office
Salve Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus (Cuz)

Would this work for you?

The new Nova Roman oath of office

I _____________________( fill in name) am not now nor have I ever been a member of the Boni, nor a friend of one nor an associate of one, nor a client of one nor a childhood neighbor of one or had dinner with one or even read one of their posts on or off the main list of Nova Roma or any other list in this life or a past one and will not be any other above in any future life either.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Who can not take the above Oath as he has had dinner, after Roman days, with a Bonus or two and 10 other Nova Romans. : )
----- Original Message -----
From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus<mailto:hermeticagnosis@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 5:31 PM
Subject: The Boni remain as a group. was Re: [Nova-Roma] Divergent viewpoints


Salva Diana et salvete omnes -

Yes Diana, but I notice you still haven't renounced your Boni
membership.
If that organization were truly "defunct" then it would cost you
nothing to do so - after all, what possible harm could there be in
"quitting" a group that no longer exists?
Yet those who protest the loudest that the Boni are "defunct" all
refuse to drop their claim, their identity, as members. Now, why
cling to a membership if there's no longer a group to be a member of?
The answer is obvious: The Boni remain. Not just the people, but the
group, as a group. Perhaps quiescent on their list, or perhaps moved
to another list, but still a group and a political group at that.
Hence the refusal to give up identifying themselves as Boni.
When known members *all* are saying "Yes, I'm a Bonus but the Boni
don't exist as a group...." - that is, when a *group* of people are all
identifying as members yet claiming there is no group - can it really
be believed?

Valete
- S E M Troianus
Moderati Candidate for Quaestor


On Dec 21, 2004, at 5:02 PM, Diana Aventina wrote:

>
> Salve Troianus,
>
> <Declare your independence, not just for this campaign (which is how
> <it is being seen), but for real, and denounce such a dispicable
> <outlook for the vile and unproductive thing that it is.
>
> Personally I am seeing both sides of these endless arguments as being
> vile and unproductive.
>
> Vale,
>
> Diana
>
>
> Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus <hermeticagnosis@...>
> wrote:
> Salvete
>
> On Dec 21, 2004, at 2:03 PM, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
>
>> At least they told it to you straight until it became against the law
>> to so..
>
> Since the only speech that is against the law is defamatory and/or
> obscene, this appears to be an admission that "the Boni" approach is
> much as Maior has been making it out to be, at least in Q.Fabius'
> opinion.
>
> Metellus, Laenas and you others, take note, and formally renounce any
> Boni affilliation in order to distance yourself from such a view.
> "Guilt by association" is wrong, but people have a tendency to do it
> anyway, and you really don't want to be associated with such an
> outlook.
>
> Note also, Laenas et al, that telling "it straight" in an illegal way
> is what Q.Fabius thinks of as the Boni Way. He apparently doesn't
> consider your reasoned approach, using fact and argument, to be "Boni"
> in some way. Unfortunately, QFM and Drusus have been so loud so often
> that many people *do* think of being abusive as being the Boni Way. Is
> this how you want to be seen?
>
>
> Valete
> - S E M Troianus
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Jazz up your holiday email with celebrity designs. Learn more.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=1292qmj3d/M=298184.5639630.6699735.3001176/D=groups/S=1705313712:HM/EXP=1103754707/A=2434971/R=0/SIG=11eeoolb0/*http://www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60185400>




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/>

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31465 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: And if you all would calm down?
In a message dated 12/21/04 4:04:35 PM Pacific Standard Time,
dom.con.fus@... writes:

> Esteemed Libras, to whom my sympathy clearly goes (how couldn't it, I'm a
> zodiacal Libra after all

So am I, Kal OCT. Libra's are about balance. I see no balance here.

120 mails are nothing. During the campaign of 02 there were 205 mails in 45
minutes.

They are just warming up.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31466 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: And if you all would calm down?
Salve Fusce.

1. Which Iulius Caesar are you referring to?

2. At what time and date did you start and end your count? I didn't
get the same total as you did - for either me (or Cornelianus) or
Troianus.

Vale
Gnaeus Iulius Caesar


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
<dom.con.fus@e...> wrote:
> Esteemed Libras, to whom my sympathy clearly goes (how couldn't it,
I'm a
> zodiacal Libra after all) but I'm not a member of, and you oh so
independent
> candidates on the other side...
>
> ...Do you realize that in the last 24 hours you dropped on this
list 132
> messages and in the last 4 hours only you managed to send 63
messages, one
> message every 4 minutes??? What about if you ALL could calm down a
bit?
>
> And especially you, Julius Caesar, with 21 messages and you,
Troianus, with
> 18 (so you see I do not pick on any specific side)... hell, give us
a break
> (and I'm sure one will get upset at the latter line and the other
will
> realize the good in it)!
>
> In the last 24 hours we got 132 messages coming from just about 20
people
> and most of them really dropped less than 5... this is a chatroom
volume,
> not a mailing list.
>
> If you (all the ones who post more than 10 mails a day, not jut the
two
> above) really can't help it, give the whole population a time and
server on
> irc, make a nova roma channel and talk it out, showing you
rethorical kill,
> but hell, do not force the other 200 people on this list to drown
in this
> tidal wave of words, it doesn't help either side, really.
>
> As an aletrnative, drop simply a mail saying "what X has just said
is
> bullshit, do not consider it", because that's what most of you is
just
> saying regarding a previos posts, but at least the other people on
this
> mailing list would have a much easier time sorting out and deleting
posts,
> rather than having to read lines an dlines (often pointlessly
quoted) to get
> the point that can be so brillantly expressed in thehalf line
reported
> above.
>
> Incidentally, in the time it took to write this little mail, six
more
> messages hit my mailbox... as Charlie Brown would say.. good grief.
I just
> know tomorrow morning I shall find another 150 messages waiting to
be
> read...
>
> Vale
>
> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
> The one who dropped less than 10 mails in the whole electoral
campaign and
> that , with all good will, is unnerved to be just barely able to
keep up
> with such volumes of mass mailing.
>
>
> Aedilis Urbis
> PF Constantinia
> Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
>
> --
> Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te:
http://www.email.it/f
>
> Sponsor:
> Libri e CD musicali nuovi con sconti dal 60 all'80%!
> Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?
mid=814&d=20041222
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31467 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: And if you all would calm down part II
In a message dated 12/21/04 4:04:35 PM Pacific Standard Time,
dom.con.fus@... writes:

> As an alternative, drop simply a mail saying "what X has just said is
> bullshit, do not consider it", because that's what most of you is just
> saying regarding a previous posts

I think we would if the law didn't forbid it. And now you are going to
moderated and it is
a bad time to be moderated during an election when razor wit, and educated
speech for a timely response in the forum is necessary.

Q Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31468 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
In a message dated 12/21/04 4:03:08 PM Pacific Standard Time,
a_apollonius_cordus@... writes:

> Thanks for showing us these responses. May I orate
> briefly?
>


If we say no, would that stop you? :-)

> This selection of responses suggests an epidemic of
> confusion and muddle-headedness in our patrés - no
> doubt a temporary plague caused by being convened at
> short notice. The reasons of those who voted 'no' seem
> to fall into three camps.
>

Pray tell.

> The first, containing two of the six speeches which
> give reasons (I don't count Probus Macedonicus'
> response, since it's impossible to know what his "some
> concerns" are and into which group they fall), is the
> camp of 'I don't know enough about the guy to
> authorize him for this job'. That's a very reasonable
> and sensible position, though it is a shame these
> senátórés were unable to actually talk to Kaelus in
> order to get to know him better.
>

Yes it was. Of course no one stopped Kaelus from adderssing the Senate,
something
he did not really do. The other candidate did, and found several Senatorial
sponsors as well, to speak in his behalf.
The feeling that seemed to infuse the House was that Kaelus was an unknown
factor, and one that needed more time here in Nova Roma before being considered.

Bene valete
Q. Fabius Maximus





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31469 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: New Nova Roman Oath of Office
In a message dated 12/21/04 4:15:53 PM Pacific Standard Time, spqr753@...
writes:

> Who can not take the above Oath as he has had dinner, after Roman days,
> with a Bonus or two and 10 other Nova Romans. : )
>

And found him to be utterly charming, right?
The food was good, the company delightful, and the wine delicious.
Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31470 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: New Nova Roman Oath of Office
Salve Q. Fabius Maximus

Absolutely both you and Diana and the other Nova Romans as well.

Vale

TGP
----- Original Message -----
From: QFabiusMaxmi@...<mailto:QFabiusMaxmi@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] New Nova Roman Oath of Office


In a message dated 12/21/04 4:15:53 PM Pacific Standard Time, spqr753@...<mailto:spqr753@...>
writes:

> Who can not take the above Oath as he has had dinner, after Roman days,
> with a Bonus or two and 10 other Nova Romans. : )
>

And found him to be utterly charming, right?
The food was good, the company delightful, and the wine delicious.
Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=129ptoihb/M=295196.4901138.6071305.3001176/D=groups/S=1705313712:HM/EXP=1103763093/A=2128215/R=0/SIG=10se96mf6/*http://companion.yahoo.com>




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/>

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31471 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: And if you all would calm down, or shut down?
Salvete omnes,

I have discussed this situation before and will do it again. This ML
is like the forum meeting place where people can chat and have things
out with one another in a pleasant or unpleasant way. Out of 2000
souls I noticed that a few dozen are consistantly active on this list
which indicates to me that they are at least very dedicated and
interested in the affairs of NR. They also tell us of the great works
other Nova Romans, less vocal or not vocal at all may be doing behind
the scenes on sites that are more obscure or in another language. The
fact that the vast majority of citizens or socii choose not to
participate on the ML is not the problem or concern of these frequent
posters. Never have I seen this site ever slowed or frozen up by
traffic. When there are a huge number of postings I simply scan and
zero in on the articles of interest.

OK, for argument's sake we could make a temporary limit to each
member of 3 posts a day. I guarentee the list would eventually slow
to a trickle, a few postings a day, boredom and apathy which breeds
boredom and apathy would set in and eventually participation and
interest would grind to a standstill as on many other NR lists. I say
be thankful to this little group (however argumentative) that is
prolific enough to keep NR on the go and continually active.

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus










--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
<gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
>
> Salve Fusce.
>
> 1. Which Iulius Caesar are you referring to?
>
> 2. At what time and date did you start and end your count? I didn't
> get the same total as you did - for either me (or Cornelianus) or
> Troianus.
>
> Vale
> Gnaeus Iulius Caesar
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
> <dom.con.fus@e...> wrote:
> > Esteemed Libras, to whom my sympathy clearly goes (how couldn't
it,
> I'm a
> > zodiacal Libra after all) but I'm not a member of, and you oh so
> independent
> > candidates on the other side...
> >
> > ...Do you realize that in the last 24 hours you dropped on this
> list 132
> > messages and in the last 4 hours only you managed to send 63
> messages, one
> > message every 4 minutes??? What about if you ALL could calm down
a
> bit?
> >
> > And especially you, Julius Caesar, with 21 messages and you,
> Troianus, with
> > 18 (so you see I do not pick on any specific side)... hell, give
us
> a break
> > (and I'm sure one will get upset at the latter line and the other
> will
> > realize the good in it)!
> >
> > In the last 24 hours we got 132 messages coming from just about
20
> people
> > and most of them really dropped less than 5... this is a chatroom
> volume,
> > not a mailing list.
> >
> > If you (all the ones who post more than 10 mails a day, not jut
the
> two
> > above) really can't help it, give the whole population a time and
> server on
> > irc, make a nova roma channel and talk it out, showing you
> rethorical kill,
> > but hell, do not force the other 200 people on this list to drown
> in this
> > tidal wave of words, it doesn't help either side, really.
> >
> > As an aletrnative, drop simply a mail saying "what X has just
said
> is
> > bullshit, do not consider it", because that's what most of you is
> just
> > saying regarding a previos posts, but at least the other people
on
> this
> > mailing list would have a much easier time sorting out and
deleting
> posts,
> > rather than having to read lines an dlines (often pointlessly
> quoted) to get
> > the point that can be so brillantly expressed in thehalf line
> reported
> > above.
> >
> > Incidentally, in the time it took to write this little mail, six
> more
> > messages hit my mailbox... as Charlie Brown would say.. good
grief.
> I just
> > know tomorrow morning I shall find another 150 messages waiting
to
> be
> > read...
> >
> > Vale
> >
> > Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
> > The one who dropped less than 10 mails in the whole electoral
> campaign and
> > that , with all good will, is unnerved to be just barely able to
> keep up
> > with such volumes of mass mailing.
> >
> >
> > Aedilis Urbis
> > PF Constantinia
> > Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
> >
> > --
> > Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te:
> http://www.email.it/f
> >
> > Sponsor:
> > Libri e CD musicali nuovi con sconti dal 60 all'80%!
> > Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?
> mid=814&d=20041222
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31472 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: And if you all would calm down part II
A. Apollónius Cordus Q. Fabió Máximó omnibusque sal.

Constantínus Fuscus wrote:

> > As an alternative, drop simply a mail saying "what
> X has just said is
> > bullshit, do not consider it", because that's what
> most of you is just
> > saying regarding a previous posts

You replied:

> I think we would if the law didn't forbid it. And
> now you are going to
> moderated and it is
> a bad time to be moderated during an election when
> razor wit, and educated
> speech for a timely response in the forum is
> necessary.

I think you're in danger of misleading people about
the law and making them worry unnecessarily. There's
nothing in any léx which forbids statements like the
one Fuscus suggested.

It's true that this year one or two people have been
placed on brief spells of moderation for rowdy
behaviour or lewd comments, but I'm not aware that
anyone has been moderated for swearing or for saying
that another person was talking rubbish.

And isn't it like you always say about the blasphemy
decree: if people do it, they get several warnings,
and if they ignore the warnings, they get punished.
The difference is that the punishment for blasphemy is
banishment from Nova Róma; the punishment for breaking
the list guidelines is a few weeks on moderated
status.

Now, you know very well that I don't like the list
guidelines and I don't like seeing people put on
moderated status for expressing their views
forcefully. But There's no need for people to be
scared to write what they want to write. The worst
that will happen is they'll get put on moderation,
which is hardly a terrible fate. And if all they write
is what Fuscus wrote above, I doubt they'll even get
that.

By the way, thanks for your response to my message
about the senate's vote on Kaelus - as I said, I don't
have a big problem with people saying that they just
don't know him well enough to vote 'yes'. But I don't
think it's fair to say that this was the overall sense
of the meeting - only two people actually gave that as
the reason for voting 'no', and even if you add those
who didn't state a reason, you're still left with four
senátórés who justified their 'no' votes by reference
to considerations which had nothing to do with the
issue at hand.





___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31473 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: And if you all would calm down?
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes, sed in particularum Q. Fabius Maximus et D.
Constantinus Fuscus.

Here we have INDISPUTABLE evidence that astrology is bunkum: the
fact that Constantinus Fuscus, Quintus Maximus, and I are ALL
ZODIACAL LIBRAS (I am ante diem XIV Kal. NOV.) yet I am the only
truly well-balanced one. Or would be if my cold medicine wasn't
making me wooooozy.

Valete,

Cato <CLUNK> ouch


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 12/21/04 4:04:35 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> dom.con.fus@e... writes:
>
> > Esteemed Libras, to whom my sympathy clearly goes (how couldn't
it, I'm a
> > zodiacal Libra after all
>
> So am I, Kal OCT. Libra's are about balance. I see no balance
here.
>
> 120 mails are nothing. During the campaign of 02 there were 205
mails in 45
> minutes.
>
> They are just warming up.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31474 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: And if you all would calm down?
>
> Here we have INDISPUTABLE evidence that astrology is bunkum: the
> fact that Constantinus Fuscus, Quintus Maximus, and I are ALL
> ZODIACAL LIBRAS (I am ante diem XIV Kal. NOV.) yet I am the only
> truly well-balanced one. Or would be if my cold medicine wasn't
> making me wooooozy.
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato <CLUNK> ouch

I'm a Scorpio;-)

no more fusce I promise:)
Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31475 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salve Corde, et salvete Quirites,

A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
> A. Apollónius Cordus Cn Equitió Marínó amícó
> omnibusque sal.
>
> Thanks for showing us these responses. May I orate
> briefly?

Oh sure. Go ahead.

> This selection of responses suggests an epidemic of
> confusion and muddle-headedness in our patrés - no
> doubt a temporary plague caused by being convened at
> short notice.

Yes, they only had four days notice that the Senate was to be called, another
four days for discussion in which very little was actually said, and then five
days to vote.

[remainder snipped]

I agree with your conclusions. As a Senator of Nova Roma I have to say I was
disappointed in the Senate's performance here. It was quite a near-run thing
for Metellus to be approved too, though he had the advantage of being better known.

Vale,

--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31476 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: A question for All candidates and others on Elected Pontiffs
Salve Romans

In order to be better informed on this subject , which I believe has been discussed of late, I would like to ask some questions on the subject of elected Pontiffs.

I would like to ask these of the candidates for office in Nova Roma and anyone else who can provide some education on this topic.


1. How historic would the election of the CP and that of the PM be?

2. Do you support or oppose the election of the members of the College of Pontiffs?

3. If you do support the election of the CP would the election be open to all Nova Romans or just the practitioners of the Religio Romanum?

4. If you support the CP as an elected body would this include the office of Pontiff Maximus being declared open so that can be elected also?

5. If the office of PM was opened to election would the CP or the citizens of Nova Roma elect the Pontiff Maximus?

6. Would it be open to all Nova Romans or just the practitioners of the Religio Romanum?

I thank you in advance for you answers.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31477 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Gaius Modius Athanasius S.P.D.

L. Modius Kaelus is a good young man. I have met him personally, and can
attest to his character. While I do feel his time in Nova Roma is less than
what I would like to see, I do know him and that changes things a little -- at
least for me.

The office of webmaster is work, and a lot of work. Currently there is no
one else wanting to assume the responsibility of webmaster. I see no reason
to prevent him doing the duties of webmaster.

Next month the senate will have to figure out what they are going to do with
NO webmaster.

*sigh* The senate has spoken.

Valete;

Gaius Modius Athanasius

In a message dated 12/21/2004 4:19:31 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
mlcinnyc@... writes:

G. Equitius Cato Consules et Senatores S.P.D.

Salvete, illustrii virii.

I must absolutely echo the sentiments expressed by C. Moravius
Laureatus Amoricus regarding L. Modius Kaelus. We have been offered
the services of an intelligent, hard-working young citizen, and we
turn him away? Please, gentlemen, would you kindly explain the
rationale behind waiving the one age requirement yet retaining the
other? I mean no disrespect, gentlemen, but as this will have a
drastic impact on the res publica, I do think it is reasonable to ask
that you explain the reasons behind this decision.

Valete bene,

Cato





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31478 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: And if you all would calm down?
---Salve Maior:

I'm a Scorp too :)




Po


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> >
> > Here we have INDISPUTABLE evidence that astrology is bunkum:
the
> > fact that Constantinus Fuscus, Quintus Maximus, and I are ALL
> > ZODIACAL LIBRAS (I am ante diem XIV Kal. NOV.) yet I am the only
> > truly well-balanced one. Or would be if my cold medicine wasn't
> > making me wooooozy.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Cato <CLUNK> ouch
>
> I'm a Scorpio;-)
>
> no more fusce I promise:)
> Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31479 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: A question for All candidates and others on Elected Pontiffs
Salve Tiberi Galeri, et salvete Quirites,

Tiberius Galerius writes:

> I would like to ask these of the candidates for office in
> Nova Roma and anyone else who can provide some education on this topic.

I think that out of regard for poor Fuscus and everyone else who feels drowned
in e-mail, we should limit this to candidates for magistracies that actually
can propose legislation: the Cosuls and the Tribunes.

> 1. How historic would the election of the CP and that of the PM be?

It all depends on how it was done. If done in accordance with Roman law, then
very historic.

> 2. Do you support or oppose the election of the members of
> the College of Pontiffs?

If done in accordance with Roman law, with the Collegium Pontificum required to
perform the primary selection of candidates, I could support the concept. I
would have to see the specific terms of the proposed law before I could comment
further. I most certainly would not support having pontifices elected
annually, or during the general elections.


> 3. If you do support the election of the CP would the election
> be open to all Nova Romans or just the practitioners of the Religio Romanum?

The only process I would support would require the Collegium Pontificum to
approve any candidate before they could be voted on by the Comitia Populi Tributa.

> 4. If you support the CP as an elected body would this include
> the office of Pontiff Maximus being declared open so that can be elected also?

Of course. However, once in office pontifices serve for life, so I would not
support placing any of the pontifical offices currently occupied up for
election until the pontifex holding that office either dies or voluntarily
relinquishes office.

> 5. If the office of PM was opened to election would the CP or the citizens
> of Nova Roma elect the Pontiff Maximus?

The Collegium Pontificum would select two finalists, who would then face a
special election in the Comitia Populi Tributa.

> 6. Would it be open to all Nova Romans or just the practitioners of
> the Religio Romanum?

These special elections involved having half of the tribes chosen by lot to
vote. Since there is no way of requiring people to divulge their religious
affiliation under our Constitution, we could not limit such an election to only
a particular group of people. However, the pre-selection of candidates by the
CP would insure that only qualified and recommended people were able to stand
for the offices.


Vale,


--
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31480 From: Susan Davis Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
> The office of webmaster is work, and a lot of work. Currently
there
> is no one else wanting to assume the responsibility of webmaster. I
> see no reason to prevent [Kaelus] doing the duties of webmaster.
>
> Next month the senate will have to figure out what they are going
> to do with NO webmaster.

There's always the Lysandrian solution: someone could take the office,
appoint Kaelus as her scribe, and delegate everything to Kaelus.
Ideally, this would be someone web-savvy, who could step in and act as
a de facto webmaster suffectus if Kaelus should vanish into thin air
at some point during the year. (I'd recommend that the Senate
exercise its right to award Kaelus the century points that he would
have earned from serving as Magister Araenarius if he winds up serving
in this way.)

I'd volunteer to be this figurehead myself, but the Lex Equitia de
Vigntisexviris mandates that a byelection be held to fill the
position, and I'll be forbidden to stand for any office next year
while serving as Diribitrix. Surely, another willing volunteer can be
found?

Vale,
Claudia Iulia
(delegata potestas potest delegari :-) )

--
Claudia Iulia <futabachan@...>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31481 From: Legion XXIV Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Legion XXIV Vicesima Quarta Newsletter Dec-2004
VICESIMA QUARTA
The Newsletter of
LEGION XXIV - MEDIA ATLANTIA

DECEMBER 2004

Gallio Velius Marsallas / George Metz
Praefectus - Commander
13 Post Run - Newtown Square PA 19073-3014
610-353-4982
legionxxiv@... www.legionxxiv.org

Commilitones

ADVENAE - Newcomers

*** Bryan Reif (Quintus Bianchius Rufinus) frbryanreif@... is from the Western Reaches of our Provincia in Hamilton, OH and will be assigned to our Mid-West Vexillation. He comes to us with Civ-War and WW-II reenactment experience, and so should be a ready asset to the Legion.
*** Brad Russ (Decimus Artorius Romulus Maximus) russ8@... is from up north in Windsor, Ontario will be a tyro-recruit with our Mid-West Vexillation.
*** John Shook starbulldog@... who signed on back in October as an auxiliary soldier and slinger has been really doing his homework on preparing his kit and impression and has communicated with the Commander several times about the proper gear. He will provide an interesting and very much needed alternative to our usual 1st Century AD presentation.
*** Chris Goshey (Phillipos) pvthatchet@... is from Exton, PA not far from the Legion's Castra. He has quite a varied experience, having been reenacting for 5 years as a Civil-War soldier, WW-I doughboy and WW-II Soviet Frontovik, so we should have little trouble fitting him into the Roman Army, if we can get him used to not having a big "fire-stick" by his side.
*** Mike Alamo (Tiberius Archias Fox) tiberiusfox@... hails from well below the Mason-Dixon Line, way down in Georgia. He has been assigned to serving as a vexillation member. He looked at other units, but wanted to enlist with Legion XXIV. He vows to come north at least once a year, possibly to Roman Days? He has done JROTC and graduated from the
US Army Challenge Academy and has knowledge of Roman military history, so we should be able to teach him some Latin drill commands?
*** James Benthul (Hirsutias Benthulius Latranis) jameshbenthul@... is an adjunct history teacher in Baton Rouge, LA. Being from well outside the Legions normal theater of operations, he has been assigned to vexillation duty. He has been directed toward Legion III Gallica, which serves in his region and may be a more practical unit for him to be come active with.
He will however, be kept on our rolls as an associate recruit. We hope to see him up north when he gets himself outfitted for service to Rome.

*** Please join me in welcoming these new members to our ranks.

FOR SALE
Owen Hutchins is selling his lorica segmentata. It was made by Joe Piella, and fits about a 50" chest.
It has a little rust which he'll remove off prior to sale, and has been banged up a little, but is otherwise
in good shape. Asking price $350. Contact him directly at owenbrau@...


NEED A SEGMENTATA ? RLQM Special!
The Roman Legion Quartermaster, Sean Richards of Legion IX, is having a Sale!
If two of our legionaries can go in together for a set of "seg" armor, before January 1, 2005,
you can each get a custom-fit, hand-made Corbridge style Lorica Segmentata for only $525,
$25 off the $550 retail price.
This offer ends Dec 31, 2004. Contact Sean at www.rlqm.com for the details.


MORE GEAR UP FOR GRABS ?
The Mighty Maximus John Ebel is selling his legionary gear.
** Type "A" Lorica segmentata - size 44-46; never used and in excellent condition, and with a custom-made stand to display it . .
** Gallic "G" helmet with sideways cream/black officer's crest . . .
** Pompeii gladius with sheath and baldric . .
** Mainz gladius with sheath and baldric . . .
** Full-size and correct military scutum, curved with good backing reinforcement . . . .
** Red, cream military tunics (2). . . .
** Hand-made caligae (brown leather; military-style). . . .
** Patera, canteen
He is asking for a package price of $1,200. This is a complete set-up, minus only pilia and an apron-style military belt.
If any new recruits are looking for a full set up, please contact John at gladius1@...

**** Our sister Legion XX in Maryland also has some legionary equipment up for grabs and their Commander Matt Amt is making it available to his members and Legion XXIV before he advertises it in his newsletter.
** Ed Safford, one of the Legion XX's co-founders of old, is selling off several items.
** A Crest for a helmet is still available, red horsehair in a red wood block, made by myself and Ed.
It comes with a nice steel support, and an excellent wooden storage and carrying box that Ed made. $75
** Hand-forged Mainz Gladius, $300. Second from left in this photo: http://www.larp.com/legioxx/gladii3.jpg
** Wonderful blade by Dave Stone, hilt and scabbard by Matthew Amt.
The grip is wood and a little skinny, but it can be replaced with a bone one very easily. Pommel and guard are walnut.
Scabbard is a simple brass frame with a nice finial over green linen-covered wood.
Very easy to add decorated plates or replace the linen with leather, etc. Has a baldric with a buckle.
Matt has the crest and sword at his my castra, and can bring them to any event or workshop, etc.
You can either pay him (cash or check) or write a check out to Ed, and he will forward it to him.
** One or two marching satchels for sale, $100 each.
Won't these bargains look great under your Christmas tree? Order today!
Don't delay! Anything that doesn't sell will end up being advertised, and could end up going off to some far off distant land to Romans we don't know - or worse - to E-Bay - Horrors!!
Valete, Matthew/Quintus, Legio XX "Emporium" mamt@... legioxx@...

UPCOMING CAMPAIGNS for 2005
*** April 13-14 Roman Days Northeast, Marshfield, MA
*** June 3-5, Roman Days, Marietta Mansion, Glenn Dale, MD. Includes visits by school groups on Friday, and possibly a mini-symposium on Thursday.
*** August 6-7, Annual Fort Malden Military Days, Amherstburg, Ontario
*** August 16-20, Pennsic War, Coopers Lake Campground, New Castle, PA, I-79 and Rt 422
*** October 22-23, Probable Ren Faire appearance, Waterloo Village, Netcong, NJ, I-80-exit 25 11AM-5PM

Be sure to check the website from time to time. It is updated at least once a month and generally more than once.
www.legionxxiv.org A new Movie Page covering the several filming campaigns of Legion XXIV and its Allies has been put-up.
The Gladiatorium Page has recently undergone a major update with many Latin terms added. There other minor dates throughout
the website. Check in often.

I am most gratified that our Legion XXIV has prospered over the years since 1998 and Thank You All for helping to make the Legion one of the more well recognized and respected Roman reenactment units.

I extend my most sincere Wishes that this Holiday Season of 2004, and the coming year of 2005, may bring friends to your fireside, peace to your pathway and good health and happiness to you and yours, along with the enduring friendships and the many freedoms with which we have all been blessed.



Happy Holidays !! And a Prosperous New Year !!!



And don't make any New Year's Resolutions that you would not want to get caught breaking!



Thanking you for your continued support of Legion XXIV, I remain;

Yours in the Bonds of Ancient Rome

Gallio / George



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31482 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2004-12-21
Subject: Re: Cato Gets Crankier
Salve, A. Apolloni Corde -

On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 11:21:31PM +0000, A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
> A. Apoll nius Cordus C. Minuci Scaevolae am c
> omnibusque sal.
>
> Cat wrote:
>
> > > I think all this stuff is quite inappropriate
> > considering the
> > > SUBJECT LINE. You dolts! I'm CRANKY, get it?
> > There is no time for
> > > happy little songs or ---- <DING!> OOOOH! The
> > fries are done!
> > > Woohoo!
> >
> > Ah, a perfect example of MBSO (Management By Shiny
> > Object). Oooh,
> > pretty...
>
> If Cat has been eating shiny fries, it's no wonder
> he's feeling poorly.

I've *told* him all that grease is bad for him, but would he listen?...


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Non omne quod licet honestum est.
Not everything that is permitted is honest.
-- Corpus Iuris Civilis: Digesta
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31483 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: And if you all would calm down?
Salve Fusce

>>(and I'm sure one will get upset at the latter line and the other
will realize the good in it)!<<

You meant Troianus would get upset and I would see the
good...right ;)?

Vale
Caesar


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
<dom.con.fus@e...> wrote:
> Esteemed Libras, to whom my sympathy clearly goes (how couldn't
it, I'm a
> zodiacal Libra after all) but I'm not a member of, and you oh so
independent
> candidates on the other side...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31484 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Salvete
On Dec 21, 2004, at 5:39 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:

> Now this brings me down memory lane...with this description of
> a 'new' look for Maior and all the metal trappings, I'm reminded of
> an old Ozzie/Sabbath tune, called Iron Man...

Wouldn't something by Iron Maiden be more appropriate?

Valete
- Troianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31485 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: A question for All candidates and others on Elected Pontiffs
Ave

> 1. How historic would the election of the CP and that of the PM be?

Well, as for historic, as for having happened historically, we all know it
would be historic at leas tfor the single Pontifices.

> 2. Do you support or oppose the election of the members of the College
> of Pontiffs?

Neither. As a christian I feel I shouldn't meddle with the composition of
the Collegium. I might do something when a specific act of the Collegium
has a direct impact on the non Religio-practicing part of the population
or is downright illegal (I think my past record of messages on this
mailing list goes to show I strictly avoid religion-related discussions
unless the subject falls in eithr of those categories too, or at least I
feel, maybe wrongly, that they do), but right now, I do not see a
cooptative or elective Collegium -discussion falling in either category so
it's basically no business of mine as a christian and thus I have not a
position. Should I ever happen to vote on the issue (unlikely), I'd
probably abstain.

I'm afraid this shall be my answer even for the other questions of yours,
which revolves about the same issue... basically, I'm definitely for a
"Religio to Religio practitioners" position. I know that even like that
some conflicts may arise (In a Roman-based society it's unavoidable that
the religious side will overlap at times with the civil one) and in those
case I feel a civil confrontation and eventually a vote will have to solve
the situaion. Yet, I do not see elected/cooptated CP as being likely to be
one of those cases.

Btw, not to spam the mailing list with yet another mail... someone 8can't
remember who, was 100 messages ago) asked me how I did count the messages
in my previous mail: I counted the messages that have arrived in my
mailbox between midnight an midnight... the reason of the different count
is probably due the fact my midnight is the midnight in Rome so the
referral points differs from the ones of the one who asked.

Vale

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
Aedilis Urbis
PF Constantinia
Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31486 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Oh I think by Saxon - "Wheels of Steel"

Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius
Troianus <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
> Salvete
> On Dec 21, 2004, at 5:39 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:
>
> > Now this brings me down memory lane...with this description of
> > a 'new' look for Maior and all the metal trappings, I'm reminded
of
> > an old Ozzie/Sabbath tune, called Iron Man...
>
> Wouldn't something by Iron Maiden be more appropriate?
>
> Valete
> - Troianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31487 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Polybius
<You know I'm going to require all of the candidates to form a Conga <Line
<with me before I announce the election results, don't you?
<(OK, not really...)

Ah Marinus, that's too bad. The conga line idea sounds fun! How 'bout a limbo contest to break the ties instead of a coin flip :-)

Vale,
Diana




---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31488 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Conga lines
<I don't know how to do the Conga...

Not a prob, girl ! Just hang on to the person in front of you you, smile and shake your booty a bit!



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Jazz up your holiday email with celebrity designs. Learn more.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31489 From: CornMoraviusL@aol.com Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salve Corde amice,

I wanted to write something along this line but you have done a far better job than I could.

While we are there I would also respectfully ask are magistrates what are the age of the respective candidates?

Valete

Moravius Laureatus


In an email dated Wed, 22 12 2004 12:01:03 am GMT, "A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...> writes:

>
>A. Apollónius Cordus Cn Equitió Marínó amícó
>omnibusque sal.
>
>Thanks for showing us these responses. May I orate
>briefly?
>
>This selection of responses suggests an epidemic of
>confusion and muddle-headedness in our patrés - no
>doubt a temporary plague caused by being convened at
>short notice. The reasons of those who voted 'no' seem
>to fall into three camps.
>
>The first, containing two of the six speeches which
>give reasons (I don't count Probus Macedonicus'
>response, since it's impossible to know what his "some
>concerns" are and into which group they fall), is the
>camp of 'I don't know enough about the guy to
>authorize him for this job'. That's a very reasonable
>and sensible position, though it is a shame these
>senátórés were unable to actually talk to Kaelus in
>order to get to know him better.
>
>One other senátor gives as a reason not any
>consideration of the merits of the fellow in question
>but the fact that the position he hopes to be elected
>to ought not to exist. This is rather baffling. The
>position does exist, and until it ceases to exist it
>must be filled. Rejecting a certain candidate for the
>post does not make the post vanish, nor does allowing
>him to stand for election make it any more difficult
>to abolish the job at a later date. All it achieves is
>that the job is not being done by anyone. The senate's
>job when considering applications for waivers is not
>to decide whether the office the applicant wants ought
>to exist, it is to consider whether the applicant
>deserves to be allowed to stand for the office which
>he wants to stand for. One does not expect a judge to
>say 'I am going to let this murderer go free because I
>think murder ought to be legal'. That's not the
>decision the judge is there to make.
>
>The remaining three are along the lines of 'the law
>sets a minimum age and so we should stick to it or
>else change the law'. This sounds very sane, but it
>ignores the fact that the law also allows that
>requirement of age to be waived at the discretion of
>the senate. It does not say 'this is the minimum age
>and there may be no exceptions'. It says 'this is the
>minimum age but the senate may make exceptions if it
>thinks proper' (not a direct quotation, but
>indisputably the gist).
>
>So those who say 'we should either have a strict
>minimum age or none at all', while of course entitled
>to that opinion, are defying the will of the comitia
>which enacted the law in the first place. The populus
>voted, and what the populus said is 'we want a minimum
>age to be set, but we also want the senate to look at
>each case individually and allow exceptions if
>appropriate'. These senátórés are saying 'no, we will
>not do what the law asks us to do: we will not
>consider this man on his individual merits, as the
>populus has asked us to. We will ignore the fact that
>the populus has made absolutely clear its desire for
>exemptions to be granted in deserving cases; we prefer
>to imagine that the law allows for no exemptions at
>all.'
>
>Written law, as legal thinkers since Plato have
>pointed out, is a blunt instrument - it is by nature
>general and vague, and it is incapable of taking into
>account the subtle details of real life. Thus those
>who enforce the written law have a certain degree of
>discretion in that enforcement, so that they may adapt
>the general rule to the particular circumstance. This
>is all the more true in this case, since the law in
>question specifically charges the senate with the duty
>of making such decisions. It *asks* the senate to
>consider the merits of the individual and to decide
>whether to make an exception to the rule. For any
>senátor to refuse to do that is nothing more than a
>dereliction of duty.
>
>These three senátórés and also the one who rejected
>the candidate because of objections about the office
>(and I haven't made any attempt to check which
>senátórés are the authors of these four votes because
>it makes no difference) have done a gross disservice
>to Modius Kaelus, who had every right to expect to be
>considered on his own merits and not to be dismissed
>because of considerations which are nothing to do with
>the issue; and they have done a gross disservice to
>the whole populus, which in good faith entrusted them
>with an important duty and had every right to expect
>this duty to be performed.
>
>Perhaps, as some of these senátórés have suggested,
>the relevant law ought indeed to be revised. Perhaps
>it ought to be revised in order to remove the duty of
>considering waivers from the senate, which clearly has
>no interest in doing as the populus asks of it, and to
>give this duty to someone else.
>
>
>    
>    
>        
>___________________________________________________________
>ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31490 From: CornMoraviusL@aol.com Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salve Consul,


It was quite a near-run thing
>for Metellus to be approved too, though he had the advantage of being better known.
>

So does it confirm the old saying: "It's not what you know, it's who you know".

Oh, wait, my goldfish is very popular and much like by many...shall I offer his services to the Republic?

Valete

Moravius Laureatus

>Vale,
>
>--
>Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31491 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Gaius Modius Athanasius S.P.D.

I am 34.

In a message dated 12/22/2004 5:21:12 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
CornMoraviusL@... writes:

While we are there I would also respectfully ask are magistrates what are
the age of the respective candidates?

Valete

Moravius Laureatus





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31492 From: Decimus Iunius Silanus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salve Aule Apolloni,

>The first, containing two of the six speeches which
>give reasons (I don't count Probus Macedonicus'
>response, since it's impossible to know what his
"some
>concerns" are and into which group they fall), is the
>camp of 'I don't know enough about the guy to
>authorize him for this job'. That's a very reasonable
>and sensible position, though it is a shame these
>senátórés were unable to actually talk to Kaelus in
>order to get to know him better.

I'm assuming I'm one of the two senators you have
placed in this category. Let me ask you a question. If
you were an employer advertising for a position, and
you received a blank application form with only a
candidates most basic details filled in, would you
shortlist for the position? Most unlikely.

I do not believe that senators should have to chase
information in order to come to a decision on every
senate item placed on an agenda. Those placing an item
for consideration before the senate should collate and
submit all the information at their disposal. This was
what I did when I requested the senate create the
province of Hibernia. Otherwise most senators are
likely to reach a decision based on the information at
hand.

Vale

Decimus Iunius Silanus







___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31493 From: Decimus Iunius Silanus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salve Cai Moravi,

> So does it confirm the old saying: "It's not what
you
> know, it's who you know".

Thats an unfair comment.

Modius has not yet been a registered citizen of six
months, the minimum prerequisite of any magistracy.
Metellus has a proven track record of service and
dedication to Nova Roma. Waivers should not be granted
for every excemption requested.

Modius Kaelus should (and hopefully will) get his
first chance as it comes to most of us, at the service
of a sitting magistrate.

Vale

Decimus Iunius Silanus






___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31494 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salvete omnes,

In my opinion Metellus is well beyond his biological years with
regards to his knowledge and writing abilities. I know many in their
thirties to fifties in our macro world, relatively well educated that
do not measure up to him in that regard. Occasionally making an age
dispensation for the likes of him and Serapio is a wise decision.


Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, CornMoraviusL@a... wrote:
> Salve Consul,
>
>
> It was quite a near-run thing
> >for Metellus to be approved too, though he had the advantage of
being better known.
> >
>
> So does it confirm the old saying: "It's not what you know, it's
who you know".
>
> Oh, wait, my goldfish is very popular and much like by many...shall
I offer his services to the Republic?
>
> Valete
>
> Moravius Laureatus
>
> >Vale,
> >
> >--
> >Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31495 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Salve Troianus,

You ask me to renounce my membership to the Boni. By the way though, they really are defunct and not hiding out on another list. I think taht I can count on one hand how many Boni emails there were during the last 3 months or so. So to me my renouncing the Boni is a bit meaningless, but okey dokey, if it will make some of you feel better than here it is!

I hereby renounce my membership/affiliation to the faction called the Boni.

I would like to state however that I am independent and will not ever again link myself to any organized political party, factio, (or whatever) in Nova Roma. I find that this party stuff only draws thick lines on the ground with citizens standing on different sides. My political platform is to stay out of the arguing and to work with anyone of good intentions in NR. Difference of opinion is just fine and in fact healthy, but here in NR the discussions have a constant, and I mean constant, undertone of hostility. And that is certainly unproductive.

Vale,
Diana

Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus <hermeticagnosis@...> wrote:
Salva Diana et salvete omnes -

Yes Diana, but I notice you still haven't renounced your Boni
membership.
If that organization were truly "defunct" then it would cost you
nothing to do so - after all, what possible harm could there be in
"quitting" a group that no longer exists?
Yet those who protest the loudest that the Boni are "defunct" all
refuse to drop their claim, their identity, as members. Now, why
cling to a membership if there's no longer a group to be a member of?
The answer is obvious: The Boni remain. Not just the people, but the
group, as a group. Perhaps quiescent on their list, or perhaps moved
to another list, but still a group and a political group at that.
Hence the refusal to give up identifying themselves as Boni.
When known members *all* are saying "Yes, I'm a Bonus but the Boni
don't exist as a group...." - that is, when a *group* of people are all
identifying as members yet claiming there is no group - can it really
be believed?

Valete
- S E M Troianus
Moderati Candidate for Quaestor


On Dec 21, 2004, at 5:02 PM, Diana Aventina wrote:

>
> Salve Troianus,
>
> <Declare your independence, not just for this campaign (which is how
> <it is being seen), but for real, and denounce such a dispicable
> <outlook for the vile and unproductive thing that it is.
>
> Personally I am seeing both sides of these endless arguments as being
> vile and unproductive.
>
> Vale,
>
> Diana
>
>
> Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus <hermeticagnosis@...>
> wrote:
> Salvete
>
> On Dec 21, 2004, at 2:03 PM, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
>
>> At least they told it to you straight until it became against the law
>> to so..
>
> Since the only speech that is against the law is defamatory and/or
> obscene, this appears to be an admission that "the Boni" approach is
> much as Maior has been making it out to be, at least in Q.Fabius'
> opinion.
>
> Metellus, Laenas and you others, take note, and formally renounce any
> Boni affilliation in order to distance yourself from such a view.
> "Guilt by association" is wrong, but people have a tendency to do it
> anyway, and you really don't want to be associated with such an
> outlook.
>
> Note also, Laenas et al, that telling "it straight" in an illegal way
> is what Q.Fabius thinks of as the Boni Way. He apparently doesn't
> consider your reasoned approach, using fact and argument, to be "Boni"
> in some way. Unfortunately, QFM and Drusus have been so loud so often
> that many people *do* think of being abusive as being the Boni Way. Is
> this how you want to be seen?
>
>
> Valete
> - S E M Troianus
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Jazz up your holiday email with celebrity designs. Learn more.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Dress up your holiday email, Hollywood style. Learn more.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31496 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: New Nova Roman Oath of Office
> Who can not take the above Oath as he has had dinner, after Roman <days, with a Bonus or two and 10 other Nova Romans. : )

Shame on you Tiberius! You've done more than me. Since I was not part of the Boni at the time of our dinner at Roman Days 2003, I have never had dinner with a Boni. But I did drive in Q Fabius Maximus rented bright yellow convertible Jaquar. So I'm not totally innocent ha ha!

Vale,

Diana



In a message dated 12/21/04 4:15:53 PM Pacific Standard Time, spqr753@...
writes:

> Who can not take the above Oath as he has had dinner, after Roman days,
> with a Bonus or two and 10 other Nova Romans. : )
>

And found him to be utterly charming, right?
The food was good, the company delightful, and the wine delicious.
Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Send holiday email and support a worthy cause. Do good.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31497 From: Dan Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salve.

> In my opinion Metellus is well beyond his biological years with
> regards to his knowledge and writing abilities. I know many in
their
> thirties to fifties in our macro world, relatively well educated
that
> do not measure up to him in that regard. Occasionally making an age
> dispensation for the likes of him and Serapio is a wise decision.

I agree. I always look forward to my conversations with him on
instant messenger or in person. Our exchanges have always been
amicable, and he is both well-reasoned and knowledgable, as you've
said. If there was anyone who deserved an age waiver, it would be
him. I doubt anyone could lodge a complaint against Metellus in
regards to his ability or his dedication to Nova Roma and make it
stick. :-)

Vale,
Lucius Modius Kaelus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31498 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
G. Popillius Laenas G. Moravio Laureato Armorico salutem dicit.


I am 49, have been out in the business world for 25+ years, been
married for 20 and have two teenage (nearly ;-) daughters.

Vale bene!



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, CornMoraviusL@a... wrote:
> Salve Corde amice,
>
> I wanted to write something along this line but you have done a far
better job than I could.
>
> While we are there I would also respectfully ask are magistrates
what are the age of the respective candidates?
>
> Valete
>
> Moravius Laureatus
>
>
> In an email dated Wed, 22 12 2004 12:01:03 am GMT, "A. Apollonius
Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@y...> writes:
>
> >
> >A. Apollónius Cordus Cn Equitió Marínó amícó
> >omnibusque sal.
> >
> >Thanks for showing us these responses. May I orate
> >briefly?
> >
> >This selection of responses suggests an epidemic of
> >confusion and muddle-headedness in our patrés - no
> >doubt a temporary plague caused by being convened at
> >short notice. The reasons of those who voted 'no' seem
> >to fall into three camps.
> >
> >The first, containing two of the six speeches which
> >give reasons (I don't count Probus Macedonicus'
> >response, since it's impossible to know what his "some
> >concerns" are and into which group they fall), is the
> >camp of 'I don't know enough about the guy to
> >authorize him for this job'. That's a very reasonable
> >and sensible position, though it is a shame these
> >senátórés were unable to actually talk to Kaelus in
> >order to get to know him better.
> >
> >One other senátor gives as a reason not any
> >consideration of the merits of the fellow in question
> >but the fact that the position he hopes to be elected
> >to ought not to exist. This is rather baffling. The
> >position does exist, and until it ceases to exist it
> >must be filled. Rejecting a certain candidate for the
> >post does not make the post vanish, nor does allowing
> >him to stand for election make it any more difficult
> >to abolish the job at a later date. All it achieves is
> >that the job is not being done by anyone. The senate's
> >job when considering applications for waivers is not
> >to decide whether the office the applicant wants ought
> >to exist, it is to consider whether the applicant
> >deserves to be allowed to stand for the office which
> >he wants to stand for. One does not expect a judge to
> >say 'I am going to let this murderer go free because I
> >think murder ought to be legal'. That's not the
> >decision the judge is there to make.
> >
> >The remaining three are along the lines of 'the law
> >sets a minimum age and so we should stick to it or
> >else change the law'. This sounds very sane, but it
> >ignores the fact that the law also allows that
> >requirement of age to be waived at the discretion of
> >the senate. It does not say 'this is the minimum age
> >and there may be no exceptions'. It says 'this is the
> >minimum age but the senate may make exceptions if it
> >thinks proper' (not a direct quotation, but
> >indisputably the gist).
> >
> >So those who say 'we should either have a strict
> >minimum age or none at all', while of course entitled
> >to that opinion, are defying the will of the comitia
> >which enacted the law in the first place. The populus
> >voted, and what the populus said is 'we want a minimum
> >age to be set, but we also want the senate to look at
> >each case individually and allow exceptions if
> >appropriate'. These senátórés are saying 'no, we will
> >not do what the law asks us to do: we will not
> >consider this man on his individual merits, as the
> >populus has asked us to. We will ignore the fact that
> >the populus has made absolutely clear its desire for
> >exemptions to be granted in deserving cases; we prefer
> >to imagine that the law allows for no exemptions at
> >all.'
> >
> >Written law, as legal thinkers since Plato have
> >pointed out, is a blunt instrument - it is by nature
> >general and vague, and it is incapable of taking into
> >account the subtle details of real life. Thus those
> >who enforce the written law have a certain degree of
> >discretion in that enforcement, so that they may adapt
> >the general rule to the particular circumstance. This
> >is all the more true in this case, since the law in
> >question specifically charges the senate with the duty
> >of making such decisions. It *asks* the senate to
> >consider the merits of the individual and to decide
> >whether to make an exception to the rule. For any
> >senátor to refuse to do that is nothing more than a
> >dereliction of duty.
> >
> >These three senátórés and also the one who rejected
> >the candidate because of objections about the office
> >(and I haven't made any attempt to check which
> >senátórés are the authors of these four votes because
> >it makes no difference) have done a gross disservice
> >to Modius Kaelus, who had every right to expect to be
> >considered on his own merits and not to be dismissed
> >because of considerations which are nothing to do with
> >the issue; and they have done a gross disservice to
> >the whole populus, which in good faith entrusted them
> >with an important duty and had every right to expect
> >this duty to be performed.
> >
> >Perhaps, as some of these senátórés have suggested,
> >the relevant law ought indeed to be revised. Perhaps
> >it ought to be revised in order to remove the duty of
> >considering waivers from the senate, which clearly has
> >no interest in doing as the populus asks of it, and to
> >give this duty to someone else.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >___________________________________________________________
> >ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31499 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salve Decime Iuni, et omnes,

Decimus Iunius Silanus wrote:

> If you were an employer advertising for a position, and
> you received a blank application form with only a
> candidates most basic details filled in, would you
> shortlist for the position? Most unlikely.

Do you read your Senate mail Silanus? If so, did you see this message
from Kaelus, forwarded to the Senate mailing list by me?

--- Begin Quoted Material ---
To: SenatusRomanus@yahoogroups.com
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@c...>
Subject: [Fwd: L. Modius Kaelus waiver to run for office]

Forwarded for the Senate archives.

-- Marinus

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Your waiver to run for office
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 01:22:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Kaelus Secundus <xkaelusx@y...>
To: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@c...>


Honourable Consul et Senators of Nova Roma,

I come to you today to announce my candidacy and my intention to run
during the coming elections for the office of Curator Araneum
(webmaster) for Nova Roma.

With the shortage of cives willing to run for this office, I have
decided to step forward and offer my services to res publica. While I do
not feel myself particularly the most qualified citizen for this
position in terms of experience or knowledge, I believe I am adequately
endowed enough with these qualities to carry out the administrative
tasks associated with the position. I am also hard-working, attentive,
and more than willing to do anything and everything this office entails.

I would, however, with the Senate's approval, like to appoint a staff of
qualified individuals to assist me with the various tasks in which I do
not feel as competent. While I can satisfy all the basic needs of
office, I feel that it is best to draw on the expertise and assistance
of those willing, especially with the various projects and improvements
I have in mind to initiate. Graphic design and visual programming is my
strong suit, and I intend to use these talents to the best of my
abilities in the service of Nova Roma.

I humbly ask that in this particular case you waive the pre-requisite
based on age for this office. I am twenty years old (3/4/84), and will
turn twenty-one during the term of office, thus meeting all the
requirements for the magistracy.

This announcement and request was made on the sixth of Decembras, in the
year MMDCCLVII auc.

Valete,
Lucius Modius Kaelus

--- End Quoted Material ---

That message was posted to the Senate mailing list at 04:35 on December
6th. Voting didn't begin until dusk in Rome on the 8th. In the day and
a half available not one Senator posted anything to the Senate mailing
list about Kaelus, and I'm the only one who posted about Metellus.
Since there was no discussion at all, nor the barest hint that you or
anyone else might desire additional information, I find your stated
reason above a bit disingenuous.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31500 From: CornMoraviusL@aol.com Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salvete,

My apologies to all, I did not express myself very clearly. I just wanted to know the age of Kaelus and Postumianus so that I can put the Senate decision into perspective ;-0

Although I am glad to know the rest of the candidate a bit better I am not really interested to know exactly how all they are, I am sure they would do well at whatever stage of their life.

Again, I am sorry for any misunderstanding as I must look like a very rude person if some of the lady candidates felt compelled to reveal how young they look ;)

Valete

Moravius Laureatus


In an email dated Wed, 22 12 2004 2:21:18 pm GMT, "gaiuspopilliuslaenas" <ksterne@...> writes:

>
>
>G. Popillius Laenas G. Moravio Laureato Armorico salutem dicit.
>
>
>I am 49, have been out in the business world for 25+ years, been
>married for 20 and have two teenage (nearly ;-) daughters.
>
>Vale bene!
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, CornMoraviusL@a... wrote:
>> Salve Corde amice,
>>
>> I wanted to write something along this line but you have done a far
>better job than I could.
>>
>> While we are there I would also respectfully ask are magistrates
>what are the age of the respective candidates?
>>
>> Valete
>>
>> Moravius Laureatus
>>
>>
>> In an email dated Wed, 22 12 2004 12:01:03 am GMT, "A. Apollonius
>Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@y...> writes:
>>
>> >
>> >A. Apollónius Cordus Cn Equitió Marínó amícó
>> >omnibusque sal.
>> >
>> >Thanks for showing us these responses. May I orate
>> >briefly?
>> >
>> >This selection of responses suggests an epidemic of
>> >confusion and muddle-headedness in our patrés - no
>> >doubt a temporary plague caused by being convened at
>> >short notice. The reasons of those who voted 'no' seem
>> >to fall into three camps.
>> >
>> >The first, containing two of the six speeches which
>> >give reasons (I don't count Probus Macedonicus'
>> >response, since it's impossible to know what his "some
>> >concerns" are and into which group they fall), is the
>> >camp of 'I don't know enough about the guy to
>> >authorize him for this job'. That's a very reasonable
>> >and sensible position, though it is a shame these
>> >senátórés were unable to actually talk to Kaelus in
>> >order to get to know him better.
>> >
>> >One other senátor gives as a reason not any
>> >consideration of the merits of the fellow in question
>> >but the fact that the position he hopes to be elected
>> >to ought not to exist. This is rather baffling. The
>> >position does exist, and until it ceases to exist it
>> >must be filled. Rejecting a certain candidate for the
>> >post does not make the post vanish, nor does allowing
>> >him to stand for election make it any more difficult
>> >to abolish the job at a later date. All it achieves is
>> >that the job is not being done by anyone. The senate's
>> >job when considering applications for waivers is not
>> >to decide whether the office the applicant wants ought
>> >to exist, it is to consider whether the applicant
>> >deserves to be allowed to stand for the office which
>> >he wants to stand for. One does not expect a judge to
>> >say 'I am going to let this murderer go free because I
>> >think murder ought to be legal'. That's not the
>> >decision the judge is there to make.
>> >
>> >The remaining three are along the lines of 'the law
>> >sets a minimum age and so we should stick to it or
>> >else change the law'. This sounds very sane, but it
>> >ignores the fact that the law also allows that
>> >requirement of age to be waived at the discretion of
>> >the senate. It does not say 'this is the minimum age
>> >and there may be no exceptions'. It says 'this is the
>> >minimum age but the senate may make exceptions if it
>> >thinks proper' (not a direct quotation, but
>> >indisputably the gist).
>> >
>> >So those who say 'we should either have a strict
>> >minimum age or none at all', while of course entitled
>> >to that opinion, are defying the will of the comitia
>> >which enacted the law in the first place. The populus
>> >voted, and what the populus said is 'we want a minimum
>> >age to be set, but we also want the senate to look at
>> >each case individually and allow exceptions if
>> >appropriate'. These senátórés are saying 'no, we will
>> >not do what the law asks us to do: we will not
>> >consider this man on his individual merits, as the
>> >populus has asked us to. We will ignore the fact that
>> >the populus has made absolutely clear its desire for
>> >exemptions to be granted in deserving cases; we prefer
>> >to imagine that the law allows for no exemptions at
>> >all.'
>> >
>> >Written law, as legal thinkers since Plato have
>> >pointed out, is a blunt instrument - it is by nature
>> >general and vague, and it is incapable of taking into
>> >account the subtle details of real life. Thus those
>> >who enforce the written law have a certain degree of
>> >discretion in that enforcement, so that they may adapt
>> >the general rule to the particular circumstance. This
>> >is all the more true in this case, since the law in
>> >question specifically charges the senate with the duty
>> >of making such decisions. It *asks* the senate to
>> >consider the merits of the individual and to decide
>> >whether to make an exception to the rule. For any
>> >senátor to refuse to do that is nothing more than a
>> >dereliction of duty.
>> >
>> >These three senátórés and also the one who rejected
>> >the candidate because of objections about the office
>> >(and I haven't made any attempt to check which
>> >senátórés are the authors of these four votes because
>> >it makes no difference) have done a gross disservice
>> >to Modius Kaelus, who had every right to expect to be
>> >considered on his own merits and not to be dismissed
>> >because of considerations which are nothing to do with
>> >the issue; and they have done a gross disservice to
>> >the whole populus, which in good faith entrusted them
>> >with an important duty and had every right to expect
>> >this duty to be performed.
>> >
>> >Perhaps, as some of these senátórés have suggested,
>> >the relevant law ought indeed to be revised. Perhaps
>> >it ought to be revised in order to remove the duty of
>> >considering waivers from the senate, which clearly has
>> >no interest in doing as the populus asks of it, and to
>> >give this duty to someone else.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >___________________________________________________________
>> >ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!
>http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31501 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: A question for All candidates and others on Elected Pontiffs
G. Popillus Laenas T. Galerio Paulino et quirites S.P.D.

These question about how the Collegium Pontificum is staffed can be
very complex. I believe conflict over issues of the Religio may be
one of the issues which seriously challenge Nova Roma in the future.

Tiberi Galeri, I will try to answer your questions concisely, and I
will also refer you to some prior discusions on the PeaceNR list.

>>1. How historic would the election of the CP and that of the PM be?<<

Laenas: It depends on the period you look at. At times during the
Republic, Pontifs were co-opted and, at others, elected; although for
the majority of the time it seems they were co-opted.

You can read some detailed discussions of this hsitory in the archives
of the PeaceNR list from this past August and September. The list is
here:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceNR/

>> 2. Do you support or oppose the election of the members of the
College of Pontiffs?<<

Laenas: Here I find my self agreeing with Domitius Constantinus. I
firmly bleieve that the pratitioners of the Religio should determine
how it is structured and practiced.

Our current comita are comprised of a majority of non-practitioners,
so to have an election under our current structure would violate my
firm belief.

There has been some discussion of how to structure a vehicle which
would express the will of practitioners only, but no workable
solutions have prsented themselves.

See the post of A. Apollónius Cordus on the subject here:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceNR/message/672

>>3. If you do support the election of the CP would the election be
open to all Nova Romans or just the practitioners of the Religio
Romanum?<<

Laenas: See above.

>>4. If you support the CP as an elected body would this include the
office of Pontiff Maximus being declared open so that can be elected also?

5. If the office of PM was opened to election would the CP or the
citizens of Nova Roma elect the Pontiff Maximus?

6. Would it be open to all Nova Romans or just the practitioners of
the Religio Romanum?<<

Laenas: These items would all depend on the resolution of the
difficulties I discuss in item 2 above.


Valete.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31502 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
>
> Again, I am sorry for any misunderstanding as I must look like a
very rude person if some of the lady candidates felt compelled to
reveal how young they look ;)
>
> Valete
>
> Moravius Laureatus
>

Salve Laureate!

Hahahahahahah!!! Well I was wondering about that, but I figure if
they want to run.....:-O.

Vale,

Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31503 From: Decimus Iunius Silanus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salve Gnae Equiti,

--- Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:


...In a rather haughty and condescending manner I
might add....

> Do you read your Senate mail Silanus?

You're quite correct, I had forgotten the forwarded
mail. I apologise. However, if you were to re-read my
concern at the time of the vote, it was rather to do
with the applicants length of time as a citizen. My
vote would have stood.

> Since there was no discussion at all, nor the barest
> hint that you or anyone else might desire additional
> information, I find your stated reason above a bit
> disingenuous.

With the utmost respect, I couldn't care less whether
you find my rationale disingeneuous or otherwise. If,
upon reflection, it bears up to my own scrutiny, thats
good enough for me.

Vale

Decimus Iunius Silanus





___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31504 From: CornMoraviusL@aol.com Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salve Senator,

Actually I was very much interested in the comments of three senatores who voted, quite rightly, in favour of Postumianus but against the waiver for Kaelus.

QFM didn't comment at all

PC did offer an explanation but I fail, like Cordus, to see how it is relevant to the age requirement.

And you. Although I do not share entirely your opinion I can certainly understand and respect the rationale behind it on the basis of length of citizenship.

Of course my comment was "unfair" as sarcasm always is: We shouldn't judge a whole group by the action of a few, now should we.
My apologies if I have offended you but I remain puzzled by some of the decisions made.

Optime Vale

Moravius Laureatus

In an email dated Wed, 22 12 2004 1:37:02 pm GMT, Decimus Iunius Silanus <iuniussilanus@...> writes:

>
>Salve Cai Moravi,
>
>> So does it confirm the old saying: "It's not what
>you
>> know, it's who you know".
>
>Thats an unfair comment.
>
>Modius has not yet been a registered citizen of six
>months, the minimum prerequisite of any magistracy.
>Metellus has a proven track record of service and
>dedication to Nova Roma. Waivers should not be granted
>for every excemption requested.
>
>Modius Kaelus should (and hopefully will) get his
>first chance as it comes to most of us, at the service
>of a sitting magistrate.
>
>Vale
>
>Decimus Iunius Silanus
>
>
>
>    
>    
>        
>___________________________________________________________
>ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31505 From: rory kirshner Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: FAUSTUS FOR PRAETOR - The Imperium of Respect
Avete Quirites: wondering who will make the best Praetor? Read the following by my good gens brother Lucius Arminus Faustus.

By Ceres and Diana blessings, and by Concordia Publica, many citizens have supported me on this path to the praetorship. I have talked too much with you, roman people of the quirites, how I am the best name, together with Marcus Iulius Perusianus, to deal with our laws and to accomplish their goals, romanitas.

Now I must turn and talk about the Moderation, this hard work of the praetores.

First, I must tell you in what I believe:

I believe no citizen have to be insulted on Main List.
I believe there is no reason to use dirty words that offend the sensibility of others.
I believe we cannot tolerate libels and lies.
I believe that curses have no place on the foruns of Nova Roma, neither the same Religio wording we use to praise the gods may be used to threaten citizens.

When we see Ancient Rome, we see all political discussions were Well-mannered and corteous, even with the most heated of the subjects. Surely there was the crying and shouting, but not from magistrates neither senatores or pontifices, neither by any other citizen who wanted to add something to the Republic. So we must chose to stay with the discourses on Livius, not the shouting on streets. We must stay with the best of the Ancient.

Unfortunately, will manners are also used as political weapons by some, to make new citizens leave NR, leave loathing NR. On my praetorship, we will pay close attention no citizen leave NR by not finding a healthy place. I will work closed with the consules to ensure this Republic foruns really can be a place to not be ashamed. Under my praetorship, courteousness will be the rule, respect will have full Imperium. We will have a polite forum, quirites. Surely this may be the 13th work of Hercules, but this burden will be shared with my colleagues and good citizens.

But if there is some complain, and petitio actionis, I will follow the uses of the Ancient and will submit myself to the Comitia decision, as described on our laws.


Valete bene in pacem deorum,
L. Arminius Faustus
Vote on the Libra and Moderati for all magistratures!


G. EQUITIUS MARINUS for censor
POMPEIA MINUCIA TIBERIA STRABO and FRANCISCUS APULUS CAESAR for consul
MARCUS IULIUS PERUSIANUS and LUCIUS ARMINIUS FAUSTUS for praetor
T. OCTAVIUS PIUS and L. IULIUS SULLA for curule aediles
M. CONSTANTINUS SERAPIO for plebeian aedile!

And all libriani and Moderati for Tribune and quaestor!
http://www.fraelovdesign.it/libra/



---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger 6.0 - jogos, emoticons sonoros e muita divers�o. Instale agora!


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31506 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: A question for All candidates and others on Elected Pontiffs
---P. Minucia Tiberius T. Galerio Paulino Populesque S.P.D.

While this is a subject of weighted concern for me, and I did
express it in my declaration of candidacy
http://groups.yahoo.com/goup/Nova-Roma/message/30519

I also said that I hesitated to digress too much on this as a public
statement until I spoke with the Pontifex Maximus, and of course
other members of the CP. The PM is the chief custodian of the Religo
Publica and I would be remiss not to listen to his opinions and
ideas, which he too, has gathered after years of historical and
religious pursuit.

This does not mean by any stretch that I am not concerned or
sensitive to the needs of the populace (again, see my statement,
SVP). Opinions have been expressed by key individuals recently, not
in this forum. Right now I am reading them, learning, and to a
lesser extent writing...I have already heard many opinions and
concerns from the populace, many of whom are practitioners and some
of their worries I judge as profoundly legitimate.

We really *really* need to look at all perspectives on this one.










In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@m...>
wrote:
> Salve Romans
>
> In order to be better informed on this subject , which I believe
has been discussed of late, I would like to ask some questions on
the subject of elected Pontiffs.
>
> I would like to ask these of the candidates for office in Nova
Roma and anyone else who can provide some education on this topic.
>
>
> 1. How historic would the election of the CP and that of the PM be?
>
> 2. Do you support or oppose the election of the members of the
College of Pontiffs?
>
> 3. If you do support the election of the CP would the election be
open to all Nova Romans or just the practitioners of the Religio
Romanum?
>
> 4. If you support the CP as an elected body would this include the
office of Pontiff Maximus being declared open so that can be elected
also?
>
> 5. If the office of PM was opened to election would the CP or the
citizens of Nova Roma elect the Pontiff Maximus?
>
> 6. Would it be open to all Nova Romans or just the practitioners
of the Religio Romanum?
>
> I thank you in advance for you answers.
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31507 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salve Decimus Iunius Silanus -

> Decimus Iunius Silanus wrote:
>
>> If you were an employer advertising for a position, and
>> you received a blank application form with only a
>> candidates most basic details filled in, would you
>> shortlist for the position? Most unlikely.

If that person is the *only* applicant, then Yes, they'd be about as
shortlisted as possible, a very short list of one.
If no other applicants came forward then that one would be hired if the
job really needs doing.
Is Webmaster a job that really needs doing? The answer should be
fairly obvious.

Vale
- S E M Troianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31508 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salve Troianus.

This is a general comment I make and not one in relation to the
potential candidate that was in front of the Senate.

It has been my experience in management that when hiring it is NOT
the best policy to take the only person available. When I have done
that in the past I have lived to regret it, without fail. In cases
where there is a shortage of candidates (or only one) the BEST
course of action is to run the hiring process again and re-advertise.

Vale
Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Servius Equitius Mercurius
Troianus <hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
> Salve Decimus Iunius Silanus -
>
> > Decimus Iunius Silanus wrote:
> >
> >> If you were an employer advertising for a position, and
> >> you received a blank application form with only a
> >> candidates most basic details filled in, would you
> >> shortlist for the position? Most unlikely.
>
> If that person is the *only* applicant, then Yes, they'd be about
as
> shortlisted as possible, a very short list of one.
> If no other applicants came forward then that one would be hired
if the
> job really needs doing.
> Is Webmaster a job that really needs doing? The answer should be
> fairly obvious.
>
> Vale
> - S E M Troianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31509 From: Decimus Iunius Silanus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salve,

I've already conceded my error about Modius Kealius'
application. He did indeed 'fill in the application
form'.

However....

> If that person is the *only* applicant, then Yes,
> they'd be about as shortlisted as possible, a very
> short list of one. If no other applicants came
> forward then that one would be hired if the job
> really needs doing.

Mmm, it's quite clear you're not a businessman. My
experience is that a vast majority would re-advertise
rather than employ on this basis.

But then this is getting really off-topic.

Vale

Decimus Iunius Silanus







___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31510 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salve D I Silanus -

On Dec 22, 2004, at 12:11 PM, Decimus Iunius Silanus wrote:
> Mmm, it's quite clear you're not a businessman. My experience is that
> a vast majority would re-advertise
> rather than employ on this basis.

Would rather re-advertise? Yes, but eventually Personnel has to fill
the slot.
I've been stuck with cashiers that can't count and customer service
people with almost no English.
"The machine does the calculation for them", HR says. But it doesn't
actually *count* for them.
"They can serve our overseas customers!" Yeah, right - like there's a
sign somewhere saying "all Korean customers please show up during
*this* shift".
No, I've had entirely *too* much experience with the business world, at
least here in our Metropolitan area. :-)
Eventually, the slot has to be filled - or you risk getting sued by
someone who wasn't hired claiming discrimination. The sad realities of
our times.....
At least here, in NR, in this case, the *only* Applicant appears to be
a *good* one! We are blessed!

Vale bene
- Troianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31511 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salve Troianus,

"Eventually, the slot has to be filled - or you risk getting sued by someone who wasn't hired claiming discrimination. The sad realities of our times.....At least here, in NR, in this case, the *only* Applicant appears to be a *good* one! We are blessed!"

--Don't tell the American Corruption of Liberties Union, aka ACLU, that or they'll champion some downtrodden souls cause.... :)


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! � Get yours free!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31512 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Salva Diana -

Thank you for your public declaration, and for clarifying your position.
Whether there is another Boni list or not wasn't really the point.
It's that a number of them persist in claiming Boni membership while at
the same time claiming there is no Boni group, which strikes me as
being contradictory.
So thank you for clearing up that seeming contradiction, at least as
far as your own position is concerned.
As for the others, well, you must admit it does look odd.
Sort of like an alcoholic I used to know - he'd go to AA meetings to
tie one on. Aren't the meetings alcohol free, I asked? Sure, he said
- but at a good sized meeting there's always one backslider partying in
the parking lot *behind* the public meeting.
Made me wonder if there wasn't some political partying going on, behind
the publicly defunct facade and all the claims of abstention.

Vale
- Troianus.

On Dec 22, 2004, at 4:46 AM, Diana Aventina wrote:

>
>
> Salve Troianus,
>
> You ask me to renounce my membership to the Boni. By the way though,
> they really are defunct and not hiding out on another list. I think
> taht I can count on one hand how many Boni emails there were during
> the last 3 months or so. So to me my renouncing the Boni is a bit
> meaningless, but okey dokey, if it will make some of you feel better
> than here it is!
>
> I hereby renounce my membership/affiliation to the faction called the
> Boni.
>
> I would like to state however that I am independent and will not ever
> again link myself to any organized political party, factio, (or
> whatever) in Nova Roma. I find that this party stuff only draws thick
> lines on the ground with citizens standing on different sides. My
> political platform is to stay out of the arguing and to work with
> anyone of good intentions in NR. Difference of opinion is just fine
> and in fact healthy, but here in NR the discussions have a constant,
> and I mean constant, undertone of hostility. And that is certainly
> unproductive.
>
> Vale,
> Diana
>
> Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus <hermeticagnosis@...>
> wrote:
> Salva Diana et salvete omnes -
>
> Yes Diana, but I notice you still haven't renounced your Boni
> membership.
> If that organization were truly "defunct" then it would cost you
> nothing to do so - after all, what possible harm could there be in
> "quitting" a group that no longer exists?
> Yet those who protest the loudest that the Boni are "defunct" all
> refuse to drop their claim, their identity, as members. Now, why
> cling to a membership if there's no longer a group to be a member of?
> The answer is obvious: The Boni remain. Not just the people, but the
> group, as a group. Perhaps quiescent on their list, or perhaps moved
> to another list, but still a group and a political group at that.
> Hence the refusal to give up identifying themselves as Boni.
> When known members *all* are saying "Yes, I'm a Bonus but the Boni
> don't exist as a group...." - that is, when a *group* of people are all
> identifying as members yet claiming there is no group - can it really
> be believed?
>
> Valete
> - S E M Troianus
> Moderati Candidate for Quaestor
>
>
> On Dec 21, 2004, at 5:02 PM, Diana Aventina wrote:
>
>>
>> Salve Troianus,
>>
>> <Declare your independence, not just for this campaign (which is how
>> <it is being seen), but for real, and denounce such a dispicable
>> <outlook for the vile and unproductive thing that it is.
>>
>> Personally I am seeing both sides of these endless arguments as being
>> vile and unproductive.
>>
>> Vale,
>>
>> Diana
>>
>>
>> Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus <hermeticagnosis@...>
>> wrote:
>> Salvete
>>
>> On Dec 21, 2004, at 2:03 PM, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
>>
>>> At least they told it to you straight until it became against the
>>> law
>>> to so..
>>
>> Since the only speech that is against the law is defamatory and/or
>> obscene, this appears to be an admission that "the Boni" approach is
>> much as Maior has been making it out to be, at least in Q.Fabius'
>> opinion.
>>
>> Metellus, Laenas and you others, take note, and formally renounce any
>> Boni affilliation in order to distance yourself from such a view.
>> "Guilt by association" is wrong, but people have a tendency to do it
>> anyway, and you really don't want to be associated with such an
>> outlook.
>>
>> Note also, Laenas et al, that telling "it straight" in an illegal way
>> is what Q.Fabius thinks of as the Boni Way. He apparently doesn't
>> consider your reasoned approach, using fact and argument, to be "Boni"
>> in some way. Unfortunately, QFM and Drusus have been so loud so often
>> that many people *do* think of being abusive as being the Boni Way.
>> Is
>> this how you want to be seen?
>>
>>
>> Valete
>> - S E M Troianus
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>>
>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>> Service.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Do you Yahoo!?
>> Jazz up your holiday email with celebrity designs. Learn more.
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Dress up your holiday email, Hollywood style. Learn more.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31513 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salve GJC Cornelianus -
On Dec 22, 2004, at 12:48 PM, Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus wrote:

> --Don't tell the American Corruption of Liberties Union, aka ACLU,
> that or they'll champion some downtrodden souls cause.... :)
Well, then thank the Gods that no such unworthy applied! The ACLU
can't champion someone who isn't there.

- Troianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31514 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
C. Minucius Hadrianus Felix L. Arminio Fausto et Quiritibus S.P.D.

Salvete.

So what really are the differences between the former
Boni/"conservative" candidates and the Libra
Alliance/moderati/"modernist" candidates?

Well perhaps we should first figure out how they are both the same:

Well we all know that the FBC (former-Boni Candidates) say mean, rude
and unpleasant things on the main list (or support their former-Boni
friends who do the same). Of course we also know that the Libra Alliance
candiates have also been known to say some equally mean, rude and
unpleasant things on the main list. We also know that the both the FBC
and Libras insisit that mean, rude or unpleasant things said by their
side/factio are simply free speech or a justified response to the mean,
rude or unpleasant things said by the other side/factio. So we can say
both sides are the same in that they both have made slung their fair
shair of mud and made use of personal attacks and rude or unpleasant
language on the main list.

So what does this tell us? It tells us we should probably pay little
attention to all the accusations that either faction's candidates are
unfit becuase of any unpleasantness on the main list by their members,
becuase there is plently of blame to go around.

So where does that leave us? Well we can list all the achievments of our
candidates, which is a good place to start, but ultimately we find that
both sides are again similar. Both the FBC and Libras have candidates
with long histories of public service and achievment in Nova Roma. So
that really doesn't help.

Hmmm.....

Well what then? We can look at where they stand on "issues", but we run
into a problem here as well. It is not terribly clear where either side
stands on "issues".... in fact what exactly are the "issues" anyways?

The Boni say they are for tradition - but if you look at the Libra
Alliance platform, they say they are for tradition as well.

The Libra Alliance says that NR should "Nova Roma should increase
knowledge about cultus publicus and cultus privatus and perform and
actively support public life-rituals." I don't think you'd find any FBC
disgareeing with that statement.

In fact, I suspect that there is nothing, in principle, that any FBC
candidate would disgaree with about the Libra Alliances "platfrom".

So what the heck are the differences of opinion? In the muddle of all
the bickering, conspiracy theories, accusations, mud slinging,
me-too-ism, posturing, and personal attacks on the mainlist I think it
is damn near impossible for most citizesn to really be able to
understand or articulate what the heck the differences between the FBCs
and the Libras really are (other than the fact that they don't like each
other much). People I suspect, are voting based on who their friends are
(or conversely against those who have attack their friends), on where
the candiates are from (I doubt any voters from Italia are not going to
vote for one of the Italian candiates), or based on which sides personal
attacks and mudslinging they are inclined to believe more.

Is this how we want our elections to work?

Here is a possible solution. We ask the Senate to draw up a debate
commision, with an equal representation from the different factios, to
draw up a list of perhaps 10 or 12 issue questions for the candidates in
each race. Some issues might by generic and relating to Nova Roma as
whole, while others might be specifically relate to an issue relavant
for a particular office.

The list of issues is published on the main list & announce list, and
each candidate would have a certain amount of time to post their replies
to both the mainlist & announce list (where people could read their
replies with out wading through the chaff), explaining their views on
the issue. No personal attacks or similar activity would be allowed in
the replies, rather the answers would have to focus on what the
candidate believed or would do in regards to the issue.

Just an idea.

Valete,

C. Minucius Hadrianus Felix










Lucius Arminius Faustus wrote:

>Salve,
>
>The Libra Alliance is proudly big.
>And the reasons we find on its excelent program:
>
>http://www.fraelovdesign.it/libra/platform.htm
>
>1. The Religio Statement
>Nova Roma should increase knowledge about cultus publicus and cultus
>privatus and perform and actively support public life-rituals.
>
>2. The Real-life statement
>Nova Roma should develop more real-life activities like rallies,
>civil and military reenactment events, local group gatherings (e.g.
>Oppida and Municipia),and cultural learning initiatives (e.g.
>Academia Thules, and the Religio Romana rituals video project).
>
>3. Cooperation
>The Res Publica should strengthen and increase links with public and
>private institutions eg Vindolandia Project, the Magna Mater Project,
>and actively search for public and private funding.
>
>4. Traditionalism
>Nova Roma should work to become a beacon of Roman tradition in the
>modern world. In doing this the Res Publica sould follow and apply
>the Mos Maiorum in every activity.
>
>5. Equilibrium
>The Res Publica should aspire to the Roman political equilibrium
>described by Polybius. At this period in Nova Roma's history, we have
>to protect the rights of the populus.
>
>6. Education
>The Res Publica should educate her citizens and people interested in
>Nova Roma about all aspects of Romanitas such as, but not limited to,
>Religio, military, art and daily life.
>
>
>So, how could a group with such dedication to ROMANITAS have no
>support? It grows, as big as its romanitas. That is why I am proudly
>Libriani.
>
>I´m stanting for praetorship proudly in the Libra.
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31515 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
In a message dated 12/22/04 10:02:48 AM Pacific Standard Time,
hermeticagnosis@... writes:

> Sort of like an alcoholic I used to know - he'd go to AA meetings to
> tie one on. Aren't the meetings alcohol free, I asked? Sure, he said
> - but at a good sized meeting there's always one backslider partying in
> the parking lot *behind* the public meeting.
> Made me wonder if there wasn't some political partying going on, behind
> the publicly defunct facade and all the claims of abstention.
>
>

I've come to the conclusion that you are a raving lunatic. I'm sure the
people have as well.
You have to stop drinking there old boy.

There is no official BONI faction. We disbanded in protest after all the
crap that was pulled on us this year. There are just former members....many who
are still friends. Is that clear enough for you?

Q. Fabius Maximus




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31516 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
>
>HADRIANUS: Salvete.
>
> So what really are the differences between the former
> Boni/"conservative" candidates and the Libra
> Alliance/moderati/"modernist" candidates?
>
> Well perhaps we should first figure out how they are both the same:
>********************************************************************8

Salve Hadriane;
do not ever confuse me, the Moderati or the Libra with someone
like Fabius Maximus threatening Scaevola's life! If the Boni were the
decent prudent men you make out then you and Popillius Laenas and the
rest should have thrown him out!

Secondly the Libra/Moderati have an open membership. It is visible
to every single citizen in Nova Roma. The Boni the so-
called 'conservatives' are a secret society. I asked Metellus for a
membership list. Please post one on the ML for the Quirites.

Finally, the Boni do not openly criticize one another, or punish one
another. I can tell everyone here that Consul Marinus gave me a
punishment and a tough one! 1 month moderation.

So we are not alike one bit. I would never associate myself with
bullies, with revealing details of another person's life, with
threats. Nor has any Libra or Moderati.
The candidates of the Libra/Moderati are open individuals with a
track record of good character and proven accomplishments

VOTE LIBRA/MODERTI: DEFEAT THE BONI!

FR. APULUS CAESAR & POMPEIA MINUCIA TIBERIA STRABO
FOR CONSULES!


M. IULIUS PERUSIANUS & L. ARMINIUS FAUSTUS FOR PRAETORES

CANDIDATES YOU CAN TRUST
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31517 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salve Laureatus -
On Dec 22, 2004, at 5:28 AM, CornMoraviusL@... wrote:

> Oh, wait, my goldfish is very popular and much like by many...shall I
> offer his services to the Republic?
What can he do? ;-)
We should never pass up a qualified volunteer!
Though if it's just swimming in circles, I'm sorry to tell you we've
already filled those positions.
(Tongue thoroughly in cheek...)

Vale
- Troianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31518 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
>
> There is no official BONI faction. We disbanded in protest after
all the
> crap that was pulled on us this year. There are just former
members....many who
> are still friends. Is that clear enough for you?
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus

Salve;
But is there an unofficial Boni faction? Just 'former members...many
who are still friends'.. and talk about strategy & have candidates;-)

Frankly why should we trust you?

bene vale
Marca Arminia Maior Fabiana
candidate for Tribune of the Plebs

Propraetrix Hiberniae
caput Officina Iuriis
et Investigatio CFQ
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31519 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
> Frankly why should we trust you?

You haven't given the People a reason to trust you either, Maior. Why
exactly should we trust you?

Q. Caecilius Metellus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31520 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
In a message dated 12/22/04 10:35:43 AM Pacific Standard Time,
rory12001@... writes:

> But is there an unofficial Boni faction? Just 'former members...many
> who are still friends'.. and talk about strategy &have candidates;-)
>
> Frankly why should we trust you?
>
>

Gee, why not? We (Cornelius, Sicinius and I) are not running for any
offices. Ex-members are.

And I don't get this trust issue. When I was a Consul, Praetor, Quaestor, I
carried out my duties with the highest honor and integrity. I never gave
anyone any reason to mistrust me.
I certainly never ran away from anything.

Is this because you are still pissed off about being dismissed? Get over it!
You have way too much time on your hands. The College fired you, not the
Boni. I'd thank you to remember that.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31521 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Salve Troianus,

Iron Maiden ehh? Well after going through my albums I could not find a suitable song. Perhpas "Gangland" if you rework the lyrics. Rather than:

"Gangland...dead men tell no tales..." It could be...on second thought time for this thread to die....I was trying to help ya on your suggestion :)

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31522 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Salve Troiane.


> Made me wonder if there wasn't some political partying going on, behind
> the publicly defunct facade and all the claims of abstention.
>
> Vale
> - Troianus.
>

Hahahahah!!! Well I'm not sure what else you would have me say.

I have already said:

(1) I haven't changed my mind about my traditionalist/conservative
views,

(2) I do not agree with bullying or uncivil behavior and have backed
it up with my actions,

(3) The Boni as a formal organization is inactive / defunct, and

(4) The Boni are not "sponsoring" any candidates, nor did the group
develop any "agenda" for these elections.

If you want me to sever friendships with people who were in the group,
I won't do that. If you want me to tell you I have changed how I
think, I cannot.

I suppose if some of them wanted to start talking politics again, I
would probably listen, and probably find myself in agreement wtih most
of them.

Vale,

Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31523 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Salve Q.Fabius Maximus -

On Dec 22, 2004, at 1:14 PM, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:

> I've come to the conclusion that you are a raving lunatic. I'm sure
> the people have as well.

Your conclusions are your own problem.
As for the people, with the exception of you, Dru, and the occassional
sycophant stuck like a limpet to your hindquarters, my Posts generally
get good feedback.

> You have to stop drinking there old boy.

I seldom drink, and never to excess, so it would appear you are either
mistaken, misinformed, or delusional.
>
> There is no official BONI faction.

Well, Duh! It was *never* "Official". That certainly didn't keep it
from existing.

> We disbanded in protest after all the crap that was pulled on us this
> year. There are just former members....many who are still friends.
> Is that clear enough for you?
>
Q. Fabius, you have earned such a reputation that any political Post of
yours must be taken with several large grains of salt. I will believe
people have actually left the Boni when they publicly repudiate Boni
membership. In short, I'll believe it when I see it. This "I'm a Boni
but there is no Boni" is utter nonsense in the purest sense of that
term.
You claim you have "disbanded", yet we all know it only takes one mass
e-mail to re-band, since a new list can be created with ease.
Many of these "ex-" Boni have gone to great lengths to dissociate
themselves from the behaviour of you and Drusus, so why do you persist
in being so noxious with these personal slights?

Vale
- S E M Troianus

> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31524 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
- Salve Metelle;

I gave you proof that the Quirites can put their trust in me. I
submitted myself to the judgements of the pontifices and the
magistrates of Nova Roma. No matter how much I disagreed with them &
still do!

You on the other hand never answered my questions.....
1) where is the membership list of the Boni
2) why did you resign from your position?
3) do you still want to collect the posts of Maximus, Drusus, Octavia
displaying their various abusivis behaviors?

vale bene
Marca Arminia Maior Fabiana
candidate for Tribune of the Plebs

To serve and obey the law! To serve and obey the Plebs!


> You haven't given the People a reason to trust you either, Maior.
Why
> exactly should we trust you?
>
> Q. Caecilius Metellus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31525 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Salve G.Popillius Laenas -

On Dec 22, 2004, at 1:47 PM, gaiuspopilliuslaenas wrote:

> If you want me to sever friendships with people who were in the group,
> I won't do that. If you want me to tell you I have changed how I
> think, I cannot.

I would never ask such a thing, nor would it be reasonable for anyone
to do so.
>
> I suppose if some of them wanted to start talking politics again, I
> would probably listen, and probably find myself in agreement wtih most
> of them.

Well, that's precisely how these factions come into being. At any
rate, that's how the Moderati came into existence - informal e-mails
among friends. Eventually we created a List - it cut down on
redundancy and duplication, and just made sense.

That isn't the point.
What I've been asking is why some people are still identifying
themselves as Boni members if there is no Boni group to be a member
*of*?

I should also like to add that I have found your own replies to be
thoughtful and thorough, and that I'm not accusing you of being
involved in some backroom shenanigans. I should like to believe that
you have personally satisfied everyone who may have had any lingering
concerns about you, because you certainly have made every honest
endeavor to do so.

Vale bene
- S E M Troianus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31526 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Salve, dearest Hadriane,

Well, you ask me? By Minerva Sapientissima!

I would say it is about pragmatic acts. The Libra (and the Moderati
as well) has a complete platform of romanization and adherence to the
Romanitas. The members of Libra have experience and good-will to
serve this Republic on the best. The Libriani always have a History
of RESPECT and POLITENESS, like the best roman traditions. The
Libriani nowadays represents the best of the roman traditionalism and
the clear vision of the goals of this republic.

It is clear that the friendship links too much people. This
friendship is forged on the common work, and on the respect to each
other. And on the common goals as well.

And the ´FBC´? (I´m attaching to the term I am seeing here)

Well, I cannot say about the other candidates. I´m making a campaign
of positive proposals, like was my Tribunate. So I will not speak
about the others, may the Comitia judge our acts. And to who will I
hide my feeling? The unexpected, unnnecessary, mistaken and unworthy
Vedius attack against me on this list has hurt me so much, I don´t
want to pay on the same coin (Alas, Vedius apologizes to me would be
very welcome, if we are here to the same goal on this Republic. But
it is a matter for his conscience. I am here for romanitas, not to
vane discussions, not to vanitas vanitarum.)

The ´Imperium of Respect´ is not only a idealistic goal, it is also a
practical way we should all make here.

Vale,
L. Arminius Faustus

STRABO AND CAESAR FOR CONSULES!
FAUSTUS AND PERUSIANUS FOR PRAETOR!
PIUS AND IULIUS SULLA FOR CURULE AEDILE!




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix
<c.minucius.hadrianus@n...> wrote:
> C. Minucius Hadrianus Felix L. Arminio Fausto et Quiritibus S.P.D.
>
> Salvete.
>
> So what really are the differences between the former
> Boni/"conservative" candidates and the Libra
> Alliance/moderati/"modernist" candidates?
>
> Well perhaps we should first figure out how they are both the same:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31527 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Salve Troiane,

> That isn't the point.
> What I've been asking is why some people are still identifying
> themselves as Boni members if there is no Boni group to be a member
> *of*?

Laenas: I haven't repuidated my "membership" in the Boni out of
respect for my friends. Perhaps it is best to say the group is
indefinitely inactive as to gone completely.

Without divulging personal information suffice to say that the
founders and key members of the Boni have basically disengaged from
NR. The remaining members (ex-members) are frustrated and tired of
the fight.

When you see campaigns like this one, where some have only one
platform plank, "drive out the Boni", and where some refuse to admit
that any decent person would ever be associated with the group, it is
easy to see how that could happen.

The irony of "drive out the Boni!, defeat the Boni" is that the
objective has largely already been achieved. No wonder some
members/ex-members have never revealed themselves.


>
> I should also like to add that I have found your own replies to be
> thoughtful and thorough, and that I'm not accusing you of being
> involved in some backroom shenanigans. I should like to believe that
> you have personally satisfied everyone who may have had any lingering
> concerns about you, because you certainly have made every honest
> endeavor to do so.


Laenas: Well thank you very much amice. When one stands for high
office, one has to have a tough skin. However, when one gets such
negative reactions from people one has only met over the internet, it
can get under the toughest skin.

Once again, your words are appreciated very much.

Vale bene,

Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31528 From: aoctaviaindagatrix Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Divergent viewpoints
Salvete,

I should have responded the moment I read it because now we seem
to be moving on to another topic, but..that really was lovely, Cato.

Valete,
Annia Octavia Indagatrix

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
<mlcinnyc@y...> wrote:
>
<SNIP>
> CATO: Now Quintus Maximus, you cannot have it both ways. Either
> freedom of speech INCLUDES those who have different
interpretations
> of our Constitution, or it does not. If it does not, then it is
not
> truly freedom of speech, is it? It's merely being told to tow a
> party line.
>
> So if my interpretation differs from yours, and I say so, then
> I "deserved" to be "called names"? I "deserved" to be attacked
and
> vilified because I offered a different opinion? And I am not
worthy
> of being a part of "your" Nova Roma? This is your idea of freedom
> of speech?
>
> Nova Roma does not belng to any one individual; she does not
belong
> to any one group of people; she belongs to ALL of us, the
citizens.
> She is not a private toy to be played with, a bauble that is
useful
> only when it is placed exactly where *you* want it on display.
She
> does not even belong to the Pater Patriae; she has her own life,
and
> her citizens are her blood and bones and sinews. All her
citizens.
>
> I am a Moderatus precisely because I will *not* be dictated to; I
> stand under the laws and Constitution of Nova Roma as a free
> citizen. You are welcome to your interpretation, and I am welcome
> to mine.
>
> You act as if Nova Roma is a golden casket filled with gems to
which
> you alone have the key. She *is* a golden casket filled with
gems --
> - the great Virtues and romanitas of the ancients--- but the Pater
> Patriae have unlocked that casket once and for all time, and it
> cannot be re-locked. The gems are in the hearts and minds and
hands
> of her citizens. Vox populi vox dei.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31529 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Maior,

> You on the other hand never answered my questions.....
> 1) where is the membership list of the Boni

And I told you why I won't disclose that information. If a priest of the
public faith can't uphold private faith, how can he hold up the former. But
I hope the Quirites are aware that you've asked me to break an oath I took.

> 2) why did you resign from your position?

Because the Praetor who appointed me had gone missing.

> 3) do you still want to collect the posts of Maximus, Drusus, Octavia
> displaying their various abusivis behaviors?

Quite frankly, no. I have neither the time, nor the inclination, to do so.
I have more important things to undertake than deal with someone who intends
to eradicate any portion of the population because of a personal vendetta.

Q. Caecilius Metellus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31530 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salve Laureate,

> While we are there I would also respectfully ask are
> magistrates what are the age of the respective candidates?

I have no idea how old Kaelus is (though, if I recall correctly, he's a bit
older than myself), but I am eighteen years old.

Vale,

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31531 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
--- >
>LAENAS: Without divulging personal information suffice to say that
the
> founders and key members of the Boni have basically disengaged from
> NR. The remaining members (ex-members) are frustrated and tired of
> the fight.
>
> Salve Laenas;
why can't you say who all the Boni are? If I dislike this party it
is exactly for this reason. This summer on the Peace list many stated
their affiliation including yoursel.

Secret societies have no place in Nova Roma; it is against every
principle of Roman government.

So I do not see how you can disingeniously blame me or others for
being worried at your adherence and others to a secret society.

bene vale
Marca Arminia Maior Fabiana
candidate for Tribune of the Plebs

VOTE LIBRA/MODERATI: DEFEAT THE BONI

FR. APULUS CAESAR & POMPEIA MINUCIA TIBERIA STRABO FOR CONSULES

M. IULIUS PERUSIANUS & L. ARMINIUS FAUSTUS FOR PRAETORES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31532 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Salve,

>>why can't you say who all the Boni are? If I dislike this party it
is exactly for this reason. This summer on the Peace list many stated
their affiliation including yoursel.<<

Laenas: It is not my place - it is an individual decision.

>>Secret societies have no place in Nova Roma; it is against every
principle of Roman government.<<

Laenas: Perhaps, I haven't done the historical research. And, as
many often point out, this isn't ancient Rome.

> >So I do not see how you can disingeniously blame me or others for
being worried at your adherence and others to a secret society.<<

Laenas: Disingeniously? If anything, I though I would get credit for
being candid

But enough is enough, right? I don't think I am going to get your
vote no matter how many mails we exchange? ;-).

Vale bene,

Laenas
>
> bene vale
> Marca Arminia Maior Fabiana
> candidate for Tribune of the Plebs
>
> VOTE LIBRA/MODERATI: DEFEAT THE BONI
>
> FR. APULUS CAESAR & POMPEIA MINUCIA TIBERIA STRABO FOR CONSULES
>
> M. IULIUS PERUSIANUS & L. ARMINIUS FAUSTUS FOR PRAETORES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31533 From: Dana-Cooper Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Salve All;

All this insanity has only reinforced opinions that were already
set. I've been almost a year and wonder where the cooperation and
joy of building NR? Ranting like this is disheartening.

I am a member of no party, faction, order or whatever you wish to
call them. I make up my mind independently. I am a strong woman,
that doesn't mean I'm going to automatically vote for a woman
running for office.

> So we are not alike one bit. I would never associate myself with
> bullies, with revealing details of another person's life, with
> threats. Nor has any Libra or Moderati.

As an outsider I can say that I've observed that you are one of the
most critical and fanatical people posting here.

> VOTE LIBRA/MODERTI: DEFEAT THE BONI!

How can you defeat the Boni when they don't exist? Do you need an
enemy for us to focus on rather than the shortcomings of both sides?
Are there even sides?

Vale
Drusilla Metella Germanica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31534 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Salve:
I am extremely critical & have been criticized.
that's fine. If you don't like me, don't vote for me.

There are many fine Libra/ Moderati candidates of great character, if
you don't like my views or strong opinions do not cast them upon the
Librans or Moderati. They are my own and nobody else's

it is your choice to believe if there are boni or not,
I'm sure you will see.
vale bene
Marca Arminia Maior Fabiana
candidate for Tribune of the Plebs



> As an outsider I can say that I've observed that you are one of the
> most critical and fanatical people posting here.
>
> > VOTE LIBRA/MODERTI: DEFEAT THE BONI!
>
> How can you defeat the Boni when they don't exist? Do you need an
> enemy for us to focus on rather than the shortcomings of both
sides?
> Are there even sides?
>
> Vale
> Drusilla Metella Germanica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31535 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: To the Candidates for Curule Aedile
Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Candidatis Aedilitati Curuli salutem
dicit.

Salvete,

I realize the Quirites, in large part, have already cast their votes, but I
have a few questions to ask. One of the duties of the Curule Aedileship is
handling macellum disputes. In light of that, this year's curule aediles
promulgated two edicts about just that problem. So my first question is
this: How do you intend to handle jurisdiction over the Macellum? Secondly,
do you intend to continue the edicts of the current curule aediles? And if
not, what do you intend to do (which goes back to my first question)?

I appreciate your responses.

Valete,

Quintus Caecilius Metellus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31536 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salvete omnes,

> > So does it confirm the old saying: "It's not what
> you
> > know, it's who you know". - I too used to whine!
>
>QLP -" But! You'd better know something when you get there."
>(Quote from my brother-in-law's father who was VP of Montreal
Engineering)

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31537 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Still time to vote
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit:

The Cista remains open for voting in the Centuriate and Tribal elections
and will be open until midnight in Rome tomorrow night. (6:00 pm EST,
23:00 GMT)

If you have not yet voted, please vote. The direct link to the Cista is

http://www.novaroma.org/cursus_honorum/voting/

It includes links to the declarations of all candidates, and their
personal pages. If you do not feel able to vote for anyone, please
still cast a vote of Abstieno so that there is a record of you voting.
The law requires that any citizen who does not vote in the annual
elections be reassigned to one of the four urban tribes. So please,
please, VOTE.

Valete Quirites,

Gn. Equitius Marinus
Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31538 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Woman warriors in the British Legions
Avete omnes;
I don't have the url yet better if someone has access to "British
Archeology", but in today's (Dec. 22) "London Times" there is an
article
about a cemetary serving a Roman fort in Brougham, Cumbria C.E 220
and 300 showing elaborate burials for women, their horses and their
military equipment. The assumption is may have been part of the
numerii, Roman irregulars.
Their unit came from the Danube area of Noricum, Pannonia, yes the
home according to the Greeks of the Amazons!
fascinating & wonderful
bene vale
M. Arminia Maior Fabiana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31539 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Salve Laenas -

On Dec 22, 2004, at 3:28 PM, gaiuspopilliuslaenas wrote:

> If anything, I though I would get credit for being candid
>
You do in my book.
We're all individuals and should be treated accordingly, regardless of
affilliation.
If others would do likewise, we could probably resolve most of our
differences.
Thanks again for the honesty and thoroughness of your replies. It's
appreciated.

Vale bene
- Troianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31540 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Still time to vote (Addendum)
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@c...> wrote:
> Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit:
>
> The Cista remains open for voting in the Centuriate and Tribal
elections
> and will be open until midnight in Rome tomorrow night. (6:00 pm
EST,
> 23:00 GMT)
>
> If you have not yet voted, please vote. The direct link to the
Cista is
>
> http://www.novaroma.org/cursus_honorum/voting/
>

Salve,

Just a slight addendum here. The Comitia Centuriata and Comitia
Populi Tributa will close as midnight Rome tommorow night (6pm
EST). The Comitia Plebis Tributa will remain open until 18:00 Rome
Time (Noon EST) the 26th per the call of that Comtia.

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Magister Aranearius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31541 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
C. Minucius Hadrianus Felix Marcae Arminiae Maior Fabianae S.P.D.

Salve.

Maior wrote:

>
> why can't you say who all the Boni are? If I dislike this party it
>is exactly for this reason. This summer on the Peace list many stated
>their affiliation including yoursel.
>
>
Why? When I joined the Boni, one of the stipulations was that the
membership of the Boni mailing list was PRIVATE. It was not my idea, but
we all agreed to that principle when we joined, and I hold to it still.
I gave my SOLEMN WORD to uphold that privacy. Was that privacy ever
really necessary? I don't think so, but that is not the point. I gave my
word. Maybe you don't take such things very seriously, but I will die
before I break my word once given. Period. I am not going to break a
promise I made, and cast my dignitas into the mud simply to satisfy your
paranoid curiosity. If keeping a promise is a crime, then convict me.

> Secret societies have no place in Nova Roma; it is against every
>principle of Roman government.
>
>
I'm not sure why I even bother saying this, since it's going to go in
one ear and out the other, but the Boni were never a secret society with
some sinister agenda.
No secret handshakes, diabolical plots, or anything of the like. Give
up the fantasy - the reality may not be nearly as exciting or
controversial, but it is still the truth.

Vale,

C. Minucius Hadrianus Felix
Pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31542 From: Chantal Gaudiano Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Thank You, Marinus!
Marinus--Thank you for the close of voting date! I've now voted, and I
look forward to seeing what the results are, along with everyone else.
(g)

Renata Corva

=====
Chantal
Chantal's LiveJournal
http://aerden.livejournal.com
"Yesterday, it worked.
Today, it is not working.
Windows is like that."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31543 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
Marca Arminia Maior:

Consul Marinus has also stated that you are NOT a member of the Libra
Alliance.

I believe him.

Vale;

Gaius Modius Athanasius

In a message dated 12/22/2004 1:23:29 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
rory12001@... writes:

Finally, the Boni do not openly criticize one another, or punish one
another. I can tell everyone here that Consul Marinus gave me a
punishment and a tough one! 1 month moderation.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31544 From: Chris Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Greetings
Hi, I just recently applied for citizenship to Nova Roma, my name is
Flavius Equitius Martinus. I figure since I patiently await my
citizenship approval, I'd get to know everyone at least.

Anyway, I hail from New Jersey. I'm currently a graphic designer at
the local newspaper. I draw, paint, write and play a few musicial
instruments, mainly electric guitar. I'm 25 and have been interested
in Roman History and culture for quite awhile. In fact, I've been
looking for a group, like this, so dedicated to reviving Roman
culture, religion, art and so on. An amazing culture like this does
not deserve to be relegated to the dusts of ancient history. Much
of todays world owes a lot to the Romans.

So with that, I bid farewell for now.

Bona Saturnalia!

Flavius Equitius Martinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31545 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Marca Arminia Maior:

Secret societies are not Roman, but conscription sure is. It seems as if
you are on a witch hunt, and frankly I am getting sick of your rhetoric.

Get an original idea, and post about something that has merit.

Regards;

Modius

In a message dated 12/22/2004 3:10:12 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
rory12001@... writes:

why can't you say who all the Boni are? If I dislike this party it
is exactly for this reason. This summer on the Peace list many stated
their affiliation including yoursel.

Secret societies have no place in Nova Roma; it is against every
principle of Roman government.

So I do not see how you can disingeniously blame me or others for
being worried at your adherence and others to a secret society.

bene vale
Marca Arminia Maior Fabiana






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31546 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Greetings
Salve Chris!

Welcome to Nova Roma.

Chris wrote:

> Hi, I just recently applied for citizenship to Nova Roma, my name is
> Flavius Equitius Martinus.

Always a pleasure to welcome another Equitius. I suspect you're going
to be getting a note from Censor Quintilianus about your choice of
praenomen, but I suppose some variation on F. Equitius Martinus will work.

> I figure since I patiently await my
> citizenship approval, I'd get to know everyone at least.

Come on in! Be comfortable. We're right in the middle of our annual
elections right now, so the conversations might be a bit dizzying. But
it's Saturnalia and we're celebrating that too.

> Anyway, I hail from New Jersey.

Nova Caesaria! Under the able management of my Legate Merlinia
Ambrosia. You'll have to meet her someday.

> I'm currently a graphic designer at
> the local newspaper. I draw, paint, write and play a few musicial
> instruments, mainly electric guitar.

So are you more of a Les Paul kind of guy, or a Stratocaster kind of guy?

> I'm 25 and have been interested
> in Roman History and culture for quite awhile.

What a remarkable coincidence! I've been 25 for the last 25 years, and
I'm interested in it too.

Io Saturnalia!

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31547 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: Thank You, Marinus!
Salve Renata,

Chantal Gaudiano wrote:

> Marinus--Thank you for the close of voting date! I've now voted, and I
> look forward to seeing what the results are, along with everyone else.
> (g)

Thank you for voting! I'll be posting the results just as soon as I
receive the certified final count from Chief Rogator Cordus.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31548 From: C. Fabia Livia Date: 2004-12-22
Subject: Re: To the Candidates for Curule Aedile
Q. Caecilius Metellus wrote:

> I realize the Quirites, in large part, have already
> cast their votes, but I
> have a few questions to ask. One of the duties of
> the Curule Aedileship is
> handling macellum disputes. In light of that, this
> year's curule aediles
> promulgated two edicts about just that problem. So
> my first question is
> this: How do you intend to handle jurisdiction over
> the Macellum? Secondly,
> do you intend to continue the edicts of the current
> curule aediles? And if
> not, what do you intend to do (which goes back to my
> first question)?

Back in the old days, each year's aediles issued
basically the same edict as the previous year, but
with minor changes of their own: to put it very simply
(because it's 4am here, and I'm a little tired!), I'd
like to do that.

On the whole, I do like the 'Edictum Aedilicium de
Commercio Iusto' and the 'Edictum de Interdicto
Restitutorio per Formulam Arbitratiam' very much,
particularly the way in which they draw on what
remains of the ancient aedilician edict. They give us
a very solid base to build upon - however, I'd like to
do a little further research into the historical law
before committing myself to re-issuing them entirely
as they stand.

I'm slightly less keen on the 'Edictum Aedilicium de
Legibus Pareundis in Rebus Commercii', since it brings
in macronational laws and authorities. I'd like to
look closely at whether this could be replaced by
something more historical - I'd have to talk to some
American lawyers to see whether I could do this
without losing the essential effect of the law.

Anyway, I'll look into all the details if I'm elected,
but for now I think the most important question to
think about is what, overall, we want trade in Nova
Roma to be like. And, of course, we want it to be as
much as possible like ancient Roman trade (but with
paypal). What the ancient aediles were aiming to do
when issuing their edicts was to create a commercial
culture of good faith and fair dealing. Whatever the
precise form of my edicts, I'll be working to follow
this tradition.

I hope this answers your questions, but if not, I'll
be around on-and-off until the close of polls, so feel
free to ask me more :)

Livia


=====
C. Fabia Livia
Candidate for Curule Aedile





___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31549 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Woman warriors in the British Legions
Me thinks Po might dig this news...
--- rory12001@... <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Avete omnes;
> I don't have the url yet better if someone has
access to "British
> Archeology", but in today's (Dec. 22) "London Times"
there is an
> article
> about a cemetary serving a Roman fort in Brougham,
Cumbria C.E 220
> and 300 showing elaborate burials for women, their
horses and their
> military equipment. The assumption is may have been
part of the
> numerii, Roman irregulars.
> Their unit came from the Danube area of Noricum,
Pannonia, yes the
> home according to the Greeks of the Amazons!
> fascinating & wonderful
> bene vale
> M. Arminia Maior Fabiana
>
>
>


=====
S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31550 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Not for nothing Quirites, but in the eyes of regular
society WE are all in a secret society! Lets face
it...how many of us freely advertise our NOVA
ROMANESS?
--- AthanasiosofSpfd@...
<AthanasiosofSpfd@...> wrote:
>
> Marca Arminia Maior:
>
> Secret societies are not Roman, but conscription
sure is. It seems as if
> you are on a witch hunt, and frankly I am getting
sick of your rhetoric.
>
> Get an original idea, and post about something that
has merit.
>
> Regards;
>
> Modius
>
> In a message dated 12/22/2004 3:10:12 P.M. Eastern
Standard Time,
> rory12001@... writes:
>
> why can't you say who all the Boni are? If I
dislike this party it
> is exactly for this reason. This summer on the
Peace list many stated
> their affiliation including yoursel.
>
> Secret societies have no place in Nova Roma; it is
against every
> principle of Roman government.
>
> So I do not see how you can disingeniously blame me
or others for
> being worried at your adherence and others to a
secret society.
>
> bene vale
> Marca Arminia Maior Fabiana
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
>


=====
S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31551 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Fwd: [Nova-Roma] Greetings
Salve!

As soon as your application is approved I will welcome You to Nova
Roma, but until then enjoy the "Silly Season" (election period) on
this list which we call the main list!

The Censorial office recieved your application yesterday. Approval of
citizens have stopped according to law because of the elections.
Secondly your Gens leader have to approve You and after that I fear
You will also have to wait until after the New Year until your case
can be executed in the Cohors Censoris CFQ. IO Saturnalia and a Happy
New Year!

>From: "Chris" <jojobean20@...>
>
>Hi, I just recently applied for citizenship to Nova Roma, my name is
>Flavius Equitius Martinus. I figure since I patiently await my
>citizenship approval, I'd get to know everyone at least.
>
>Anyway, I hail from New Jersey. I'm currently a graphic designer at
>the local newspaper. I draw, paint, write and play a few musicial
>instruments, mainly electric guitar. I'm 25 and have been interested
>in Roman History and culture for quite awhile. In fact, I've been
>looking for a group, like this, so dedicated to reviving Roman
>culture, religion, art and so on. An amazing culture like this does
>not deserve to be relegated to the dusts of ancient history. Much
>of todays world owes a lot to the Romans.
>
>So with that, I bid farewell for now.
>
>Bona Saturnalia!
>
>Flavius Equitius Martinus


--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31552 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Salve Marcus Flavius Fides -

On Dec 23, 2004, at 12:20 AM, raymond fuentes wrote:

> ..how many of us freely advertise our NOVAROMANESS?
>
I do. All of my family and friends know I'm an NR Citizen. Most think
it curious, some think it's eccentric, but they all know, and whenever
anyone expresses interest I talk their ears off! I've gained us one
Citizen this way, and a couple others who check the Main List from
time to time to see what's going on in New Rome. By Spring I'm pretty
sure I'll have my room-mate signed up. At Roman Days and Marching
Through Time I made it a point to talk with those who seemed
interested, whether near the NR pavillion or the Legion Camp. I'm not
at all shy!

Vale
- S E M Troianus, enthusiastic Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31553 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Salve G.M. Hadrianus Felix -
On Dec 22, 2004, at 10:15 PM, Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix wrote:

> No secret handshakes, diabolical plots, or anything of the like.
Not even a Secret Decoder Ring?

Vale
- Troianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31554 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: The Factions of Nova Roma and the Current Elections
In a message dated 12/22/04 11:25:04 AM Pacific Standard Time,
lafaustus@... writes:

> Well, I cannot say about the other candidates. I´m making a campaign
> of positive proposals, like was my Tribunate. So I will not speak
> about the others, may the Comitia judge our acts. And to who will I
> hide my feeling? The unexpected, unnnecessary, mistaken and unworthy
> Vedius attack against me on this list has hurt me so much, I don´t
> want to pay on the same coin (Alas, Vedius apologizes to me would be
> very welcome, if we are here to the same goal on this Republic. But
> it is a matter for his conscience. I am here for romanitas, not to
> vane discussions, not to vanitas vanitarum.)
>

He attacked you, only because of your intractable position. I imagine, based
on numerous conversations with him, he tends to worry over his pet project
Nova Roma.
If it was your project doubtless you would feel the same.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31555 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Divergent viewpoints
In a message dated 12/22/04 11:55:28 AM Pacific Standard Time,
christyacb@... writes:

> Now Quintus Maximus, you cannot have it both ways. Either
> >freedom of speech INCLUDES those who have different
> interpretations
> >of our Constitution, or it does not. If it does not, then it is
> not
> >truly freedom of speech, is it? It's merely being told to tow a
> >party line.
> >
> >So if my interpretation differs from yours, and I say so, then
> >I "deserved" to be "called names"? I "deserved" to be attacked
> and
> >vilified because I offered a different opinion? And I am not
> worthy
> >of being a part of "your" Nova Roma? This is your idea of freedom
> >of speech?
>

Not at all. Your postion as I understand it based on your 2000+ e mails I
have read over the year is a PC Nova Roma. And that is where I'm attacking.
And I every right to do so.
I have been more involved in NR then you, neuvo. So I'm very invested on how
it turn it.

First you tried to screw us by rewriting the constitution to your specs.
Nope we blocked that.

Then you felt that we shouldn't have freedom of religio here UNLESS it was to
your liking.
If it wasn't, well too bad, the majority here has the say. Well again bad
news, the Senate acts as a balance, as does the college.

Cato, I'm sure you mean well. But all your reforms and ideals are about
changing NR. Now people here from the beginning really don't want change. Those
114 souls LIKED Nova Roma. And I' m just as guilty as you. I too wanted to
change NR. I wanted to add some trappings of the old republic that Cassius
and Vedius missed. And that's what I did in my first two years here. So in
some small way I am much like you. But I felt my ideas enhanced NR, not tear it
down into a PC utopia that has little to do with the real Rome. Some have
the calling, some don't.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31556 From: CornMoraviusL@aol.com Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Salve Troi,

LOL.

By the way, now that the discussion on this issue is going slightly off topic (recruitment and all that...) let me say to you all that I will live by my word to accept the laws and rules of NR. As such I will not discussed the matter further and accept the Senate's decision (it doesn't mean I agree with it, but hey, Dura Lex Sed Lex...)

Optime valete

Moravius Laureatus


In an email dated Wed, 22 12 2004 6:21:56 pm GMT, Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus <hermeticagnosis@...> writes:

>
>Salve Laureatus -
>On Dec 22, 2004, at 5:28 AM, CornMoraviusL@... wrote:
>
>> Oh, wait, my goldfish is very popular and much like by many...shall I
>> offer his services to the Republic?
>What can he do? ;-)
>We should never pass up a qualified volunteer!
>Though if it's just swimming in circles, I'm sorry to tell you we've
>already filled those positions.
>(Tongue thoroughly in cheek...)
>
>Vale
>             - Troianus
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31557 From: CornMoraviusL@aol.com Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Senate meeting results
Thank you, and looking good ;-)

Laureatus

In an email dated Wed, 22 12 2004 7:56:00 pm GMT, "Q. Caecilius Metellus" <postumianus@...> writes:

>
>Salve Laureate,
>
>> While we are there I would also respectfully ask are
>> magistrates what are the age of the respective candidates?
>
>I have no idea how old Kaelus is (though, if I recall correctly, he's a bit
>older than myself), but I am eighteen years old.
>
>Vale,
>
>Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31558 From: FAC Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Candidates For Election
Salve Illustrs Senator Audens,

sorry for the delay, thank you very much for your very kind
endorsement, I'm very proud to receive the support of one of the
most important and honourable man of Nova ROma.

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, jmath669642reng@w... wrote:
> Citizens of Nova Roma;
>
> I come before you humbly to ask for your very kind consideration of
> three worthy candidates for Nova Roma Office:
>
> For Censor:
>
> The Honored Consul of last year, Gnaeus Equitus Marinus.
>
> He has served Nova Roma well in the past year, making his way
carefully
> through various problems and concerns that required not only a firm
> resolve, but also the patience, skill and intelligence to carry
out.
> This he has done very well, and I am very pleased to be able to
call
> your attention to him as an excellent Candidate for Censor. He
will
> work very closely with Censor Quintillianus, and together both of
these
> good men, I predict, will combine thier ideas to make Nova Roma
even
> stronger and more serving of it's citizens.
>
> Pompeia Minucia-Tiberia Strabo, as a Candidate for Consul:
>
> This woman has served me personnally as Accensus to me when I was
> Consul, and has served with the Sodalitas Militarum and the
Sodalitas
> Egressus, very nearly since the founding of both organizations.
She has
> earned the following honors for her services in those areas:
>
> --Beneficarius (Benefitted One) Primus;
>
> --Tribunus Militum, Sodalitas Militarium;
>
> --Praefectus (Officer) in both the Sodalitas Militarium and in the
> Sodalitas Egressus.
>
> She has been a very strong proponent in the organization, and
> presentation of a Nova Roma Event in Canada for the last three
years
>
> She has served Nova Roma as Praetor previously, and has been very
active
> in the various oganizations within Nova Roma to which she belongs.
> While it is true that she is a recent member of my Gens, such has
little
> to do with my request for your consideration. I ask only that you
> consider her for her obvious ability to organize and carry out her
plans
> for the future.
>
> Franciscus Apulus Caesar
>
> This gentleman has been extremely valuable to me as a consultant
in the
> areas of Roman Culture and the continuing Archaeology of the Roman
> Period. He has always, as long as I have known him, evidenced a
keen
> sense of Loyalty and Enthusiasm for Nova Roma which could not be
> extinguished even by those who choose to use invective against his
> views. He has been working towards completion of the Cursus
Honarium
> and has served exceptionally well as a Quaestor. In my humble view
> Master Apulus Caesar has a very strong view and abiity to maintain
a
> certain balance in everythng that he undertakes. I am sure, my
friends,
> that you will agree that balance within Nova Roma is an element
that is
> needed here at all times.
>
> Citizens of Nova Roma, I do not come before you to ask you to vote
for
> these candidates, for in my humble view to do so would be
presumptuous
> of me. However, I do ask that you consider eachof them carefully,
as
> they are worthy candidaes for the stations that they stand for.
>
> As in the past you have made the choices that has propelled Nova
Roma to
> her present station, and it is your decisions which will propel her
> forward for another year. You have chosen wisely in the past, and
I
> know that you will choose wisely again;
>
> My thanks for your very kind attention to this humble message;
>
> Very Respectfully;
>
> Marcus Minucius-Tiberius Audens
>
>
> Wishing you all the best, with Fair Winds and Following Seas!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31559 From: FAC Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Polybius
Salve Marinus, Amice,

> a web developer from Italy,

Please, art director and graphic designer ... not web developer! ;-D

ROTL

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31560 From: Chris Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
Thank you for the welcome! Forgive me for my lack of Latin, though
I shall be learning it soon once the Holidays are over with and I've
got some time on my hands. I do seem to get the gist of some of the
Latin phrases used though. All I know is a little bit of Spanish
from school and mainly from my father who comes from Uruguay South
America.

*I suspect you're going
to be getting a note from Censor Quintilianus about your choice of
praenomen, but I suppose some variation on F. Equitius Martinus will
work.*

Well, if problems do arise, I'm willing to comply. I'm a very easy
person to deal with.

*So are you more of a Les Paul kind of guy, or a Stratocaster kind
of guy?*

I'm a Les Paul Hollow Body kind of guy, though I wish I owned, but
due to the price range....but the guitars have such a beautiful
sound to them. Get that nice Chuck Berryish/50's rock sound out of
them.

Anyway, great to meet you. If I don't talk to any of you before the
holidays, Happy Holidays and Io Saturnalia.

Sincerely,
F. Equitius Martinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31561 From: rory kirshner Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: FAUSTUS FOR PRAETOR - The Imperium of Respect
Lucius Arminius Faustus <lafaustus@...> wrote:By Ceres and Diana blessings, and by Concordia Publica, many citizens have supported me on this path to the praetorship. I have talked too much with you, roman people of the quirites, how I am the best name, together with Marcus Iulius Perusianus, to deal with our laws and to accomplish their goals, romanitas.

Now I must turn and talk about the Moderation, this hard work of the praetores.

First, I must tell you in what I believe:

I believe no citizen have to be insulted on Main List.
I believe there is no reason to use dirty words that offend the sensibility of others.
I believe we cannot tolerate libels and lies.
I believe that curses have no place on the foruns of Nova Roma, neither the same Religio wording we use to praise the gods may be used to threaten citizens.

When we see Ancient Rome, we see all political discussions were Well-mannered and corteous, even with the most heated of the subjects. Surely there was the crying and shouting, but not from magistrates neither senatores or pontifices, neither by any other citizen who wanted to add something to the Republic. So we must chose to stay with the discourses on Livius, not the shouting on streets. We must stay with the best of the Ancient.

Unfortunately, will manners are also used as political weapons by some, to make new citizens leave NR, leave loathing NR. On my praetorship, we will pay close attention no citizen leave NR by not finding a healthy place. I will work closed with the consules to ensure this Republic foruns really can be a place to not be ashamed. Under my praetorship, courteousness will be the rule, respect will have full Imperium. We will have a polite forum, quirites. Surely this may be the 13th work of Hercules, but this burden will be shared with my colleagues and good citizens.

But if there is some complain, and petitio actionis, I will follow the uses of the Ancient and will submit myself to the Comitia decision, as described on our laws.


Valete bene in pacem deorum,
L. Arminius Faustus
Vote on the Libra and Moderati for all magistratures!


G. EQUITIUS MARINUS for censor
POMPEIA MINUCIA TIBERIA STRABO and FRANCISCUS APULUS CAESAR for consul
MARCUS IULIUS PERUSIANUS and LUCIUS ARMINIUS FAUSTUS for praetor
T. OCTAVIUS PIUS and L. IULIUS SULLA for curule aediles
M. CONSTANTINUS SERAPIO for plebeian aedile!

And all libriani and Moderati for Tribune and quaestor!
http://www.fraelovdesign.it/libra/



---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger 6.0 - jogos, emoticons sonoros e muita divers�o. Instale agora!


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! � Try it today!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31562 From: Marcus Iulius Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: EDICTVM AEDILICIVM VII - DESIGNATIO COLLEGIO MAGNAE MATRIS
M IVL PERVSIANVS QVIRITIBVS SPD

avete omnes,

being about the end of my Aedilship, and only a few hours to go before knowing the new Magistrates, having worked along the year with people who volunterred with joy and experience, I hereby officially recognize the names of the citizens working in the Magna Mater staff, as delineated in the definition of the MM Project structure.

This is personal recommendation for the next Chief of the Magna Mater Project to abet such structure and personnel at the beginning of year 2758 AVC.

EDICTVM AEDILICIVM VII - DESIGNATIO COLLEGIO MAGNAE MATRIS (Members of the Magna Mater Project staff)

I. In accordance with the EDICTVM AEDILICIVM IV DE COLLEGIO STABILIS SITVS INTERRETIALIS MAGNAE MATRIS CREANDO I appoint the following citizens to be members of the team working in the Magna Mater Project.

a. Editorial Staff

- Caius Curius Saturninus (editorial chief)

- Franciscus Apulus Caesar (Art Director, graphic designer)

- Vestinia Caprenia (visualist)

- Gaius Iulius Caesar Cornelianus (text editor)

- Gaius Moravius Laureatus (text editor)

- Gaius Equitius Cato (text editor)

- Manius Constantinus Serapio (special advicer for DVD-production)

b. Fund-raising staff

- Pompeia Minucia Tiberia Strabo (fundraising chief)

- Lucius Iulius Sulla (advisory Committee member)

- Gneus Equitius Marinus (advisory Committee member)

- M.Arminia Maior Fabiana (advisory Committee member)

- Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus (advisory committee member)

- Gaius Curius Saturninus (advisory Committee member)

- S. Equitius Mercurius Troianus (advisory Committee member)

II. No Century Points are awarded for being in this team.

III. This edictum takes force immediately.

Given on December 23rd 2757, in the year of Consulship of Cn. Salix Astur and Cn. Equitus Marinus

Marcus Iulius Perusianus

--------------------------------------------------------Aedilis Curulis

Vicarius Propraetoris et Legatus Internis Rebus Italiae

Magister Academiae Italicae

--------------------------------------------------------

Cohors Aedilis MIP: http://www.insulaumbra.com/aediles/perusianus/

Home Page: http://www.geocities.com/m_iulius

Italia Provincia: http://italia.novaroma.org

SignaRomanorum: http://italia.novaroma.org/signaromanorum

--------------------------------------------------------AEQVAM MEMENTO REBVS IN ARDVIS SERVARE MENTEM



---------------------------------
Nuovo Yahoo! Messenger E' molto più divertente: Audibles, Avatar, Webcam, Giochi, Rubrica… Scaricalo ora!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31563 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Salve Marce Flavi;
I'm another one. In the middle of Hibernia I've wished
everyone 'Io Saturnalia':) & told them what it is...I spread the word
to my university club and any other unsuspecting person, the
librarian,etc my extended family have heard all about NR many, many
times.....
I only wish we had "Support Magna Mater Fund' t-shirts to wear.
Do they think I'm eccentric, yes, probably, but most think I'm
having a wondeful time, making interesting friends and nifty
conversation.
bene vale
Marca Arminia Maior Fabiana
another enthusiastic citizen
>




Salve Marcus Flavius Fides -
>
> On Dec 23, 2004, at 12:20 AM, raymond fuentes wrote:
>
> > ..how many of us freely advertise our NOVAROMANESS?
> >
> I do. All of my family and friends know I'm an NR Citizen. Most
think
> it curious, some think it's eccentric, but they all know, and
whenever
> anyone expresses interest I talk their ears off! I've
> - S E M Troianus, enthusiastic Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31564 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Advertising NR
Salvete omnes,

I mentioned the other day on another list that I like advertising NR
in various subtle ways. I wear that NR Eagle ring as much as I can,
got a front licence plate with an eagle and SPRQ written under it on
my pickup truck. An ancient coin of Nero I had carefully mounted in
gold oakleaf and wear it as a guy's necklace. When I have visitors at
home I'll sometimes include some ancient dishes from my several Roman
cookbooks, make some spiced or honey flavoured wines. There is a
Pompeian sword and a Roman dagger hanging on the living room wall and
I sometimes leave colorful reference books on Ancient Rome on the
coffee table. I have a little movie library that has movies like
Gladiator and Ben Hur to documentaries like Rome In The 1st Century.
I show these to friends who are staying as guests for a spell. For
those who like the soap operas, I find " I Claudius " fits their
bills.

I these ways I am subtley advertising Rome since these things draw
people's attention and questions without them ever feeling I'm
shoving things down their throats. I would like to hear from other
Nova Romans who may have tried similar things.


Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31565 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Secret Society?
Salvete omnes,

A Southern Baptist preacher was giving his sermon one Sunday and
chastising his flock:

" Now I has told y'all about the tongue as the two edged sword that's
mentioned in Revelation, praise the lawd!
You'ze see hows it can cut deep into the spirit and soul, smighting
its victim and yes, I is talking abouts malicious gossip! Yeah, rites
in dis chruch!

Now it has comes to my attention that one of our people in this here
conjugation hassss - accuseda me of being a member of the Ku Klux
Kalannnnnnnn! I says this is a lie and whoever said this had better
get ups of their duff and connnnnnnnnnnnnnfess their sinnnnnnnn!
Come now, the lawd will purge y'all of this evil and cleanzzzzzz ya
soul. In the name of Jesus speeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeal up!"

After a few minutes of eager anticipation a sexy but dizzy looking
hung over blonde dressed in a low cut mini dress, most in
innappropriate for the service slowly rises from her pew and says in a
whiny hiccoughing voice, " Why pastor, I do declare there has been
some badddddd misunderstanding here. I sure didn't says nothing about
the Ku Klux Klans at all - I'ze only said to some of the girls that
you was a reeeeeeeeeeeeeal wizard under them sheets!


Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31566 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: EDICTVM AEDILICIVM VII - DESIGNATIO COLLEGIO MAGNAE MATRIS
Salve Marce Iuli, et salvete Quirites,

Marcus Iulius <m_iulius@...> writes:

> M IVL PERVSIANVS QVIRITIBVS SPD
>
> ... I hereby officially recognize the
> names of the citizens working in the Magna Mater staff

I join you in commending all of these fine people, who have done so much.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31567 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Salve,

Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus wrote:

>
>
>>No secret handshakes, diabolical plots, or anything of the like.
>>
>>
>Not even a Secret Decoder Ring?
>
>
Nope, the High Inner Council wouldn't approve my request for decoder
rings. *sigh*

Vale,

Hadrianus


>Vale
> - Troianus
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31568 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Oh, The blank stares I get.
I reply to everyone who asks me You dont really think
you are Roman, do you? Yes. Im a NOVA ROMAN I follow
this w/ an explanation. Response? UR not Italian
--- rory12001@... <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Marce Flavi;
> I'm another one. In the middle of Hibernia I've
wished
> everyone 'Io Saturnalia':) & told them what it
is...I spread the word
> to my university club and any other unsuspecting
person, the
> librarian,etc my extended family have heard all
about NR many, many
> times.....
> I only wish we had "Support Magna Mater Fund'
t-shirts to wear.
> Do they think I'm eccentric, yes, probably, but
most think I'm
> having a wondeful time, making interesting friends
and nifty
> conversation.
> bene vale
> Marca Arminia Maior Fabiana
> another enthusiastic citizen
> >
>
>
>
>
> Salve Marcus Flavius Fides -
> >
> > On Dec 23, 2004, at 12:20 AM, raymond fuentes
wrote:
> >
> > > ..how many of us freely advertise our
NOVAROMANESS?
> > >
> > I do. All of my family and friends know I'm an NR
Citizen. Most
> think
> > it curious, some think it's eccentric, but they
all know, and
> whenever
> > anyone expresses interest I talk their ears off!
I've
> > - S E M Troianus, enthusiastic Citizen
>
>
>


=====
S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31569 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
Salvete Consul et omnes,

This isn't fair! When I joined Nova Roma I didn't get to speak to
the Consul straight away.

Actually, now that I think about it, this is only the third time
I've spoken to any consul, and one of those was to ask for a job.

Bah, these new citizens just chatting away like it was......(carry
on ad nauseam)

valete

A very bitter T. Octavius Salvius, full of Christmas Cheer
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31570 From: Maior Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Oh, The blank stares I get.
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> I reply to everyone who asks me You dont really think
> you are Roman, do you? Yes. Im a NOVA ROMAN I follow
> this w/ an explanation. Response? UR not Italian
>
Ave;
lol..well you can blow their minds by telling them that the British,
French, Swiss, Germans, Libyans, Greeks, Hungarians, Serbs and Turks
and North Africans were all part of the Roman Empire!
bring back the good old days;-)
M. Arminia Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31571 From: Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
Salve Salvi,

Ah, but how many of us can say that we met a consul? You should
consider yourself lucky and honoured to have shared dinner with one
of them ;-) and a propraetor, and a quaestor, and a handfull of
legates...

Fear not, amice, you are in good company!

Optime vale

Laureatus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "t_octavius_salvius" <fin37@h...>
wrote:
>
> Salvete Consul et omnes,
>
> This isn't fair! When I joined Nova Roma I didn't get to speak to
> the Consul straight away.
>
> Actually, now that I think about it, this is only the third time
> I've spoken to any consul, and one of those was to ask for a job.
>
> Bah, these new citizens just chatting away like it was......(carry
> on ad nauseam)
>
> valete
>
> A very bitter T. Octavius Salvius, full of Christmas Cheer
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31572 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
Salve,

Yes Laureatus, but that was after months of hard work. Errr...
As I recall, my rather contravertial suggestion got no further then
that meeting.

Amyway,a lesson to all, being in the right place at the right time
is very useful!

vale

Salvius (but still as embittered as ever)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31573 From: Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
Too many mince pies and sherry : My memory is a bit hazy...Could you
remind me what controversial proposal you are referring to?

Vale

Laureatus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "t_octavius_salvius" <fin37@h...>
wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> Yes Laureatus, but that was after months of hard work. Errr...
> As I recall, my rather contravertial suggestion got no further then
> that meeting.
>
> Amyway,a lesson to all, being in the right place at the right time
> is very useful!
>
> vale
>
> Salvius (but still as embittered as ever)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31574 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
You're very into the Christmas spirit.

My suggestion was one of dropping a certain language as our official
one and replacing it with another certain language.

It didn't seem to be a 'winner'.

Salvius



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Moravius Laureatus
Armoricus" <CornMoraviusL@a...> wrote:
>
> Too many mince pies and sherry : My memory is a bit hazy...Could
you
> remind me what controversial proposal you are referring to?
>
> Vale
>
> Laureatus
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "t_octavius_salvius"
<fin37@h...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Salve,
> >
> > Yes Laureatus, but that was after months of hard work. Errr...
> > As I recall, my rather contravertial suggestion got no further
then
> > that meeting.
> >
> > Amyway,a lesson to all, being in the right place at the right
time
> > is very useful!
> >
> > vale
> >
> > Salvius (but still as embittered as ever)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31575 From: Chris Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
*This isn't fair! When I joined Nova Roma I didn't get to speak to
the Consul straight away. *

I have no clue to be sorry or not. I don't wish anyone to be bitter
or anything, just acting upon my own nature of wishing to get to
know everyone, though technically speaking I'm not a citizen just
yet.

> A very bitter T. Octavius Salvius, full of Christmas Cheer

Well bitter or not, great to meet you anyway.

Io Saturnalia.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31576 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
Chris wrote:
> I have no clue to be sorry or not.

Salve, "F" Equiti Martine.

Admittedly, it's rather easy to feel sorry for my cousin, but please try
to act as though he's normal. Just smile happily, wave and talk to
someone else. He'll find something distrac...err, find some other
interesting thing to do soon enough. Like trying to outstare the sun
again. *nudge nudge* ;)

Anyway, IO SATURNALIA to you and all others out there. I'm sitting here
in a red hat with a large white fluffy thing hanging down in front of my
face from it, so I regarding myself as being quite "in spirit". Though
perhaps with neither christian nor roman tradition. There's more snow
here than in either Rome or Jerusalem, though, so warm clothes and a hat
make better sense than a toga.

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus.

P.S. Caecili Metelle, I'll answer your question as soon as I can spend
some actual time considering how to phrase my views. Which may not occur
until after this weekend. IO SATURNALIA!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31577 From: wotansritter Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Taxes
Salve!

Im a cives who hasnt been very active due to macronational issues. I
wish to pay my tax but have no clue as to whom I send this to. Could
someone inform me please? Thanks in advance.


Valete

Iustinus Arcanus Latomus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31578 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Taxes
Salve Iustine Arcane,

wotansritter <wotansritter@...> writes:

> Im a cives who hasnt been very active due to macronational issues. I
> wish to pay my tax but have no clue as to whom I send this to. Could
> someone inform me please? Thanks in advance.

Sure. If you want to pay using PayPal, you can use the link on the main
website at http://novaroma.org/main.html Just scroll down the page to the
Dono Dare link and click on that. Be sure to say that it's for the annual
tax. If you want to send the payment by mail, send it to the Post Office box
listed at the bottom of the main page:

Nova Roma | Post Office Box 1897 | Wells, Maine 04090 USA

For more details see the Tax Edict for this year at
http://novaroma.org/tabularium/edicts/consul-2004-02-01.html

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31579 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
G. Equitius Cato F. Equitio Martino salutem plurimam dicit (S.P.D.)

Welcome to Nova Roma! Another Equitius! Woohoo! Where in Joizy
are you? I'm in Manhattan.

Vale bene,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Chris" <jojobean20@h...> wrote:
>
> Thank you for the welcome! Forgive me for my lack of Latin,
though
> I shall be learning it soon once the Holidays are over with and
I've
> got some time on my hands. I do seem to get the gist of some of
the
> Latin phrases used though. All I know is a little bit of Spanish
> from school and mainly from my father who comes from Uruguay South
> America.
>
> *I suspect you're going
> to be getting a note from Censor Quintilianus about your choice of
> praenomen, but I suppose some variation on F. Equitius Martinus
will
> work.*
>
> Well, if problems do arise, I'm willing to comply. I'm a very
easy
> person to deal with.
>
> *So are you more of a Les Paul kind of guy, or a Stratocaster kind
> of guy?*
>
> I'm a Les Paul Hollow Body kind of guy, though I wish I owned, but
> due to the price range....but the guitars have such a beautiful
> sound to them. Get that nice Chuck Berryish/50's rock sound out
of
> them.
>
> Anyway, great to meet you. If I don't talk to any of you before
the
> holidays, Happy Holidays and Io Saturnalia.
>
> Sincerely,
> F. Equitius Martinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31580 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Hadrianus Felix, if you become a member of the Mighty Moose Lodge of
Greater Detroit, you get a decoder ring. I can't tell you what
color, though --- THAT's a secret.

Vale,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix
<c.minucius.hadrianus@n...> wrote:
> Salve,
>
> Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >>No secret handshakes, diabolical plots, or anything of the like.
> >>
> >>
> >Not even a Secret Decoder Ring?
> >
> >
> Nope, the High Inner Council wouldn't approve my request for
decoder
> rings. *sigh*
>
> Vale,
>
> Hadrianus
>
>
> >Vale
> > - Troianus
> >
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31581 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes.

Octavius Salvus, I got bit by a Consul once. Does that count? Oh,
no, wait, I think it was a horse. Whatever.

Valete,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Moravius Laureatus
Armoricus" <CornMoraviusL@a...> wrote:
>
> Salve Salvi,
>
> Ah, but how many of us can say that we met a consul? You should
> consider yourself lucky and honoured to have shared dinner with
one
> of them ;-) and a propraetor, and a quaestor, and a handfull of
> legates...
>
> Fear not, amice, you are in good company!
>
> Optime vale
>
> Laureatus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "t_octavius_salvius"
<fin37@h...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete Consul et omnes,
> >
> > This isn't fair! When I joined Nova Roma I didn't get to speak
to
> > the Consul straight away.
> >
> > Actually, now that I think about it, this is only the third time
> > I've spoken to any consul, and one of those was to ask for a
job.
> >
> > Bah, these new citizens just chatting away like it was......
(carry
> > on ad nauseam)
> >
> > valete
> >
> > A very bitter T. Octavius Salvius, full of Christmas Cheer
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31582 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
> Admittedly, it's rather easy to feel sorry for my cousin, but
please try
> to act as though he's normal. Just smile happily, wave and talk to
> someone else. He'll find something distrac...err, find some other
> interesting thing to do soon enough. Like trying to outstare the
sun
> again. *nudge nudge* ;)


Is that was passes for family loyalty these days ;-)

Honestly, I hope the Octavii never take up organised crime, we'd not
last 5 seconds.

Salvius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31583 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Greetings
Salve,

I came off a bit too serious on that message. I'm not really bitter
at all. This is just a display of my very warped sense of humour.

Anyway, welcome to Nova Roma. If you enjoy Roman culture and
history, mixed with high (and low) politics, this is the place.

vale

Salvius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31584 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Re: Taxes
You can mail it to Nova Roma I believe, address is at the bottom of the main page....who to make a cheque out to specifically whether it is just Nova Roma or by another title I'll leave to someone else or you can do PayPal if you have an account with them...there is link for that on the main page..... with PayPal I was told to include NR as well as macronational name stating its for taxes.......
Vale,
Cornelianus

wotansritter <wotansritter@...> wrote:

Salve!

Im a cives who hasnt been very active due to macronational issues. I
wish to pay my tax but have no clue as to whom I send this to. Could
someone inform me please? Thanks in advance.


Valete

Iustinus Arcanus Latomus




Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Get unlimited calls to

U.S./Canada


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! � Try it today!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31585 From: Chantal Gaudiano Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Ancient Engineering Goodness
I was watching Modern Marvels last night on the History Channel, and
they were doing a show about Heron, an Alexandrian engineer who
invented al sorts of Neat Things--temple doors which could open
'automatically,' a coin-operated holy water vending machine, an
automatically refilling water basin, and a special effects set-up for a
theater. All of this was very, very neat stuff. I've decided to put
his books Catroptica nd Pneumatica on my personal reading list. He
even invented a steam engine, but it was only ever used as a toy.
*shakes head* This guy was the da Vinci of his time. Very fascinating
show.

Renata Corva

=====
Chantal
Chantal's LiveJournal
http://aerden.livejournal.com
"Yesterday, it worked.
Today, it is not working.
Windows is like that."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31586 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2004-12-23
Subject: Voting in the Comitia Centuriata and Comitia Populi Tributa has End
Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Quiritibus salutem dicit.

Salvete,

As of three hours ago, per the edict of Consul Marinus, voting in both the
Comitia Centuriata and the Comitia Populi Tributa has ended. Voting in the
Comitia Plebis Tributa, however, will continue for another two days, until
18:00 on the 26th.

Valete Optime in Pace Deorum,

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
Scriba Magistri Araneari
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31587 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Re: Woman warriors in the British Legions
Salvete omnes,

I was just checking this out and it sure looks like an interesting
project to study. As always there are different views on the
significance of this and here is an article I found followed by a
rebuttle by a fellow on the IR2 list:

Women warriors from Amazon fought for Britain's Roman army
BY LEWIS SMITH

THE remains of two Amazon warriors serving with the Roman army in
Britain have been discovered in a cemetery that has astonished
archaeologists. Women soldiers were previously unknown in the Roman
army in Britain and the find at Brougham in Cumbria will force a
reappraisal of their role in 3rd-century society. The women are
thought to have come from the Danube region of Eastern Europe, which
was where the Ancient Greeks said the fearsome Amazon warriors could
be found.

The women, believed to have died some time between AD220 and 300,
were burnt on pyres upon which were placed their horses and military
equipment. The remains were uncovered in the 1960s but full-scale
analysis and identification has been possible only since 2000 with
technological advances. The soldiers are believed to have been part
of the numerii, a Roman irregular unit, which would have been
attached to a legion serving in Britain. Other finds show that their
unit originated from the Danubian provinces of Noricum, Pannonia and
Ilyria which now form parts of Austria, Hungary and the former
Yugoslavia. Hilary Cool, the director of Barbican Research
Associates, which specialises in post- excavation archaeological
analysis, said that the remains were the most intriguing aspects of a
site that is changing our understanding of Roman burial rites. "It
seems highly probable that we have a unit raised in the Danubian
lands and transferred to Britain," she says in British
Archaeology. "Though the numerii are generally referred to as
irregular units, they are not thought of as having women among their
ranks. However, the unit came from the area where the Ancient Greeks
placed the origin of women warriors called Amazons. Could the numerii
be even more irregular than anyone has ever dreamt?" The cemetery at
Brougham served a fort and the civilian settlement of Brocavum in the
3rd century and analysis of the remains of more than 180 people
showed that everybody's ashes were buried there. Archaeologists have
been able to determine the ages and gender of the dead and to build
up a detailed picture of Roman funerals in Brougham. One of the sets
of women warrior's remains were found with the burnt remnants of
animals. Bone veneer, used to decorate boxes, was also found
alongside evidence of a sword scabbard and red pottery. The
possessions suggest that she was of high status and her age has been
estimated at between 20 and 40 years old. The other woman, thought to
be between 21 and 45, was buried with a silver bowl, a sword
scabbard, bone veneer and ivory.


Critique o this:

khakiberetman wrote:
>
> I've read this article in the newspaper but I have to say the
information
given
> leaves matters open to doubt. The archeologists found cremated
remains of
> women with those of horses and charred weaponry, and we must
conclude
> that they were amazons belonging to a numerus of foreign cavalry?
>
> I mean, where is the concrete proof that the remains were those of
women
> who actually rode and fought in battle alongside Roman troops?
>
> There are many reasons why horses and weaponry and actually several
> more utensils could have been cremated along with a dead woman.
Perhaps
> it was a traditional burial rite among the people who made up the
numerus
> but that does not substantiate the theory that this woman was also
a warrior.
>
> It is not unheard of that women could have taken part in fighting
among
> certain people fighting alongside the Romans, but I am a bit
surprised that
this
> bit would not be mentioned by more Roman writers, such as Vegetius,
who
> would have considered this an original curiosity worth a sentence.





Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus








--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> Avete omnes;
> I don't have the url yet better if someone has access
to "British
> Archeology", but in today's (Dec. 22) "London Times" there is an
> article
> about a cemetary serving a Roman fort in Brougham, Cumbria C.E 220
> and 300 showing elaborate burials for women, their horses and their
> military equipment. The assumption is may have been part of the
> numerii, Roman irregulars.
> Their unit came from the Danube area of Noricum, Pannonia, yes
the
> home according to the Greeks of the Amazons!
> fascinating & wonderful
> bene vale
> M. Arminia Maior Fabiana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31588 From: Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Re: Diana officially states that she is not part of the Boni....
Salve Cato -
On Dec 23, 2004, at 12:57 PM, gaiusequitiuscato wrote:

> you get a decoder ring. I can't tell you what
> color, though --- THAT's a secret.
>
I thought it was blue.

- Troi.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31589 From: Chantal Gaudiano Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Re: Greetings
Salve, Flavi Equiti Martine!

Nice to meet you! I hope you're keeping warm up in New Jersey; I've
seen weather reports on the news, and the snowstorms look pretty awful,
up north.

I live in Houston, Texas, and I came across Nova Roma almost three
years ago, while surfing Roman sites on the Web. It's a good
oganization with a lot of fine people in it; the only thing I don't
like is the seemingly constant political wrangling. There are people
in Nova Roma who are devoted to financially aiding the restoration of
ancient Roman temples, people who teach online courses on various
subjects through the Academia Thules, and so forth.

It's good to have you as a new citizen, and I look forward to getting
better acquainted over the list.

Renata Corva
(Hoping to become Renata Corva Gaudiana, at some point)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31590 From: Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Re: Taxes
well that posted late....oh well...question got answered one way or another

"Gn. Julius Caesar Cornelianus" <julius_cornelianus@...> wrote:
You can mail it to Nova Roma I believe, address is at the bottom of the main page....who to make a cheque out to specifically whether it is just Nova Roma or by another title I'll leave to someone else or you can do PayPal if you have an account with them...there is link for that on the main page..... with PayPal I was told to include NR as well as macronational name stating its for taxes.......
Vale,
Cornelianus

wotansritter wrote:

Salve!

Im a cives who hasnt been very active due to macronational issues. I
wish to pay my tax but have no clue as to whom I send this to. Could
someone inform me please? Thanks in advance.


Valete

Iustinus Arcanus Latomus




Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Get unlimited calls to

U.S./Canada


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! � Try it today!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Yahoo! Groups Links










---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31591 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Re: Woman warriors in the British Legions
Salvete omnes,

Here is an article on this with a pretty good rebuttle from a fellow
on the IR2 list where there was some discussion.




Women warriors from Amazon fought for Britain's Roman army


BY LEWIS SMITH

THE remains of two Amazon warriors serving with the Roman army in
Britain have been discovered in a cemetery that has astonished
archaeologists. Women soldiers were previously unknown in the Roman
army in Britain and the find at Brougham in Cumbria will force a
reappraisal of their role in 3rd-century society. The women are
thought to have come from the Danube region of Eastern Europe, which
was where the Ancient Greeks said the fearsome Amazon warriors could
be found.

The women, believed to have died some time between AD220 and 300,
were burnt on pyres upon which were placed their horses and military
equipment. The remains were uncovered in the 1960s but full-scale
analysis and identification has been possible only since 2000 with
technological advances. The soldiers are believed to have been part
of the numerii, a Roman irregular unit, which would have been
attached to a legion serving in Britain. Other finds show that their
unit originated from the Danubian provinces of Noricum, Pannonia and
Ilyria which now form parts of Austria, Hungary and the former
Yugoslavia. Hilary Cool, the director of Barbican Research
Associates, which specialises in post- excavation archaeological
analysis, said that the remains were the most intriguing aspects of a
site that is changing our understanding of Roman burial rites. "It
seems highly probable that we have a unit raised in the Danubian
lands and transferred to Britain," she says in British
Archaeology. "Though the numerii are generally referred to as
irregular units, they are not thought of as having women among their
ranks. However, the unit came from the area where the Ancient Greeks
placed the origin of women warriors called Amazons. Could the numerii
be even more irregular than anyone has ever dreamt?" The cemetery at
Brougham served a fort and the civilian settlement of Brocavum in the
3rd century and analysis of the remains of more than 180 people
showed that everybody's ashes were buried there. Archaeologists have
been able to determine the ages and gender of the dead and to build
up a detailed picture of Roman funerals in Brougham. One of the sets
of women warrior's remains were found with the burnt remnants of
animals. Bone veneer, used to decorate boxes, was also found
alongside evidence of a sword scabbard and red pottery. The
possessions suggest that she was of high status and her age has been
estimated at between 20 and 40 years old. The other woman, thought to
be between 21 and 45, was buried with a silver bowl, a sword
scabbard, bone veneer and ivory.






Rebuttle:



khakiberetman wrote:
>
> I've read this article in the newspaper but I have to say the
information
given
> leaves matters open to doubt. The archeologists found cremated
remains of
> women with those of horses and charred weaponry, and we must
conclude
> that they were amazons belonging to a numerus of foreign cavalry?
>
> I mean, where is the concrete proof that the remains were those of
women
> who actually rode and fought in battle alongside Roman troops?
>
> There are many reasons why horses and weaponry and actually several
> more utensils could have been cremated along with a dead woman.
Perhaps
> it was a traditional burial rite among the people who made up the
numerus
> but that does not substantiate the theory that this woman was also
a warrior.
>
> It is not unheard of that women could have taken part in fighting
among
> certain people fighting alongside the Romans, but I am a bit
surprised that
this
> bit would not be mentioned by more Roman writers, such as Vegetius,
who
> would have considered this an original curiosity worth a sentence.




Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus

















--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> Avete omnes;
> I don't have the url yet better if someone has access
to "British
> Archeology", but in today's (Dec. 22) "London Times" there is an
> article
> about a cemetary serving a Roman fort in Brougham, Cumbria C.E 220
> and 300 showing elaborate burials for women, their horses and their
> military equipment. The assumption is may have been part of the
> numerii, Roman irregulars.
> Their unit came from the Danube area of Noricum, Pannonia, yes
the
> home according to the Greeks of the Amazons!
> fascinating & wonderful
> bene vale
> M. Arminia Maior Fabiana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31592 From: Quintus Fabius Maximus Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Re: Oh, The blank stares I get.
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> I reply to everyone who asks me You dont really think
> you are Roman, do you? Yes. Im a NOVA ROMAN I follow
> this w/ an explanation. Response? UR not Italian

So, you could say "neither were the Gauls, Spanish, Greeks, Germans,
Moors, Syrians and Slavs, yet because they held Roman citizenship
they were Roman both legally and nationally. Roman citizenship is
what held the enterprise together. It assured you would treated as
Roman where ever province you would go.
Though after 212 M. Aurelius Antoninus Caracalla cheapened the whole
process by granting citizenship to all free men in the Empire under
the constitutio antoniniana.

Q. Fabius Maximus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31593 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Re: Marcus Municus Choices
G. Iulius Scaurus Gn. Equitio Marino salutem dicit.

Salve, Marine.

> > If Strabo was truely
> > Roman, she would restart the cursus as Quaestor and rework herself up.
>
> Name one Roman who did that.

P. Furius Scaevola and Gn. Servilius Calvus, 69 BCE. Both were among
the sixty-four senators appointed by Sulla who were removed from the
Senate rolls by the censores in 70 BCE. Both Scaevola and Calvus
stood for quaestor the following year and returned to the Senate.
These are only the first two examples of the phenomenon which come to
mind. It wasn't altogether that unusual a recourse for senatores who
had been removed from the Senate, particularly when their removal was
a function of not having the requisite economic status, to return by
election to the quaestorship in following years.

Vale.

Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31594 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Yahoo down?
Salvete omnes,

Looks like our Yahoo sites were in limbo today. Frustrating! Like one
of our Deni Nations fellows said about our faulty communications the
other day,
" Eh, Stands With A Coffee (my native name they joke about). Don't
care what it costs! I'll smash it and shove it up their *****! We go
back to old ways - send smoke signals!"

Anyway, hopefully we'll be back on track soon and you may have some
double postings.

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31595 From: aerdensrw Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Engineering Goodness!
I thought I had posted a message earlier to the list about the
Egyptian engineer Heon, but I can't find it to refer to, so, oh well...

I found the following link that talks about his inventions in a lot of
detail, giving design schematics. Very neat! If you like
engineering, give this a read.

http://www.mlahanas.de/Greeks/HeronAlexandria.htm

Renata Corva
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31596 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Re: Ancient Engineering Goodness
Salve Renata Corva,

Here is a book I have in my library. It covers this steam engine and
many other things.


Ancient Inventions
Author: Peter James


Format: Trade Paperback · Published: October 1995
Dimensions: 704 Pages, 7.32 x 9.24 x 1.4 IN
ISBN: 0345401026 · Published by Ballantine Books

About this Book

From Our Editors
From the stone tools created by the earliest prehistoric people to
the boom in inventions in 1492, our ancient forebears were incredible
problem solvers. Although we have many ingenious machines, labour-
saving devices and computers, we often overlook the triumphs of the
past. Ancient Inventions takes a revealing look at some of history's
most interesting inventions. Organized by theme, it covers
communication, medicine, high-tech devices, city life, military
equipment and sports and leisure. Richly illustrated, it makes a
great addition to any library.


Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus








--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Chantal Gaudiano <aerdensrw@y...>
wrote:
> I was watching Modern Marvels last night on the History Channel, and
> they were doing a show about Heron, an Alexandrian engineer who
> invented al sorts of Neat Things--temple doors which could open
> 'automatically,' a coin-operated holy water vending machine, an
> automatically refilling water basin, and a special effects set-up
for a
> theater. All of this was very, very neat stuff. I've decided to
put
> his books Catroptica nd Pneumatica on my personal reading list. He
> even invented a steam engine, but it was only ever used as a toy.
> *shakes head* This guy was the da Vinci of his time. Very
fascinating
> show.
>
> Renata Corva
>
> =====
> Chantal
> Chantal's LiveJournal
> http://aerden.livejournal.com
> "Yesterday, it worked.
> Today, it is not working.
> Windows is like that."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 31597 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2004-12-24
Subject: Yahoo Down
Salvete omnes,

I see postings did not appear for the last several hours though I
sent some as well. We may get a big barrage of delayed messages by
morning.

Regards,

QLP