Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Feb 8-23, 2005

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33637 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Re: Not A Tribune
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33638 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: IM Contacts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33639 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Re: The Nova Roma Press
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33640 From: Marcus Minucius Audens Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Communications
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33642 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Re: The Lex Cornelia et Maria...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33643 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Consular Edict Tax Rates for 2758 a.u.c.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33644 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Re: The uncertain tribunate: the way forward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33645 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Re: Lex Equitia de Civitate Ejuranda
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33646 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Oath of office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33647 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Oath of Office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33648 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Congratulations!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33649 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Apollonia Blogum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33650 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Tax Rate for Romania
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33651 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Re: Apollonia Blogum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33652 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Re: Tax Rate for Romania
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33653 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Etruscans?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33654 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: 'Jesus was Caesar': New book by Philosopher and Linguist Francesco
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33655 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Re: Congratulations!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33656 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: A quick thank you.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33658 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-02-09
Subject: Payment unclaimed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33659 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2005-02-09
Subject: Re: Etruscans?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33660 From: Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Date: 2005-02-09
Subject: Re: Payment unclaimed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33661 From: Jack the Ripper Date: 2005-02-09
Subject: Rif: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman food gods/goddesses
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33662 From: Lucius Apollonius Clement Date: 2005-02-09
Subject: A.D.62 : Pompeii - Strongly recommended.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33663 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-09
Subject: Re: A.D.62 : Pompeii - Strongly recommended.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33665 From: Dan Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: Re: Etruscans?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33666 From: Lucius Apollonius Clement Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: Re: A.D.62 : Pompeii - Strongly recommended.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33667 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: Re: A.D.62 : Pompeii - Strongly recommended
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33668 From: immaculo@bellsouth.net Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: Re: A.D.62 : Pompeii - Strongly recommended
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33669 From: Marcus Audens Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: "Aquila"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33670 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: Fwd: Re: athena statue
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33671 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: Help on internet programming needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33672 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: Re: Help on internet programming needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33673 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: Decreta announcement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33674 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: Re: Decreta announcement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33675 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: a.d. III Id. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33676 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: Join NR Latin America List
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33677 From: J Auger Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: Academia Thules
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33678 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: Re: Etruscans?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33679 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: Re: Academia Thules
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33680 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: Digest Number 1817
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33681 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: FYI
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33682 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: Re: FYI
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33683 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: Re: Genetic descent from Romans?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33684 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: Re: Digest Number 1817
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33686 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-02-12
Subject: Re: Digest Number 1817
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33687 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2005-02-12
Subject: Digest No 1818
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33688 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-12
Subject: Has anyone read this?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33689 From: Samantha Date: 2005-02-12
Subject: Announcement: Temple of Diana Project list open
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33690 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-12
Subject: Re: Has anyone read this?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33691 From: Julilla Sempronia Magna Date: 2005-02-12
Subject: Re: Has anyone read this?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33693 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-13
Subject: Re: Has anyone read this?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33694 From: Nabarz Date: 2005-02-13
Subject: Women in Britain's Roman Army
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33695 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2005-02-13
Subject: Edictum Censoris CFQ XXX about complementary appointments of three
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33696 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-02-13
Subject: Re: "Aquila"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33697 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-02-13
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33698 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2005-02-13
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33699 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-13
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33701 From: Vestinia, called Vesta Date: 2005-02-13
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33702 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-02-13
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33704 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: St. Valentine and The Lupercalia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33705 From: Maxima Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33706 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33707 From: Stefn Ullarsson Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: A Name Change and Profer of Tutelage
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33708 From: Nabarz Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: Women in Britain's Roman Army
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33709 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: Women in Britain's Roman Army
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33710 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: St. Valentine and The Lupercalia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33711 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: St. Valentine and The Lupercalia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33712 From: C. Albius Gadelicus Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Familiae Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33713 From: F & R Parkyn Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33714 From: Clovius Ullerius Ursus Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: A Name Change and Profer of Tutelage
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33715 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33716 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33718 From: Nabarz Date: 2005-02-15
Subject: Re: Women in Britain's Roman Army
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33719 From: Stefn Ullarsson Date: 2005-02-15
Subject: [Fwd: Yahoo! News - Ruins Support Myth of Rome's Founding]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33720 From: C. Albius Gadelicus Date: 2005-02-15
Subject: Re: Cerealia offered by the Flamen Cerealis on behalf of SPQNR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33722 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-02-15
Subject: Re: Cerealia offered by the Flamen Cerealis on behalf of SPQNR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33723 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-02-15
Subject: Re: Cerealia offered by the Flamen Cerealis on behalf of SPQNR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33724 From: Kyrene Ariadne Date: 2005-02-15
Subject: Name change
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33725 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-15
Subject: Re: Cerealia offered by the Flamen Cerealis on behalf of SPQNR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33727 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33728 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33729 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33730 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Praetorian Edictum III
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33731 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33732 From: C. Albius Gadelicus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33733 From: Publius Minius Albucius Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Fw : a message from a new Am. Boreooccidentalis civis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33734 From: M.ADRIANVS COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: EDICTVM PROPRAETORICIVM XXVIII (COMPLVTENSIS IV) DE TRIBVTO ANNO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33735 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33736 From: Julilla Sempronia Magna Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Fw : a message from a new Am. Boreooccidentalis civis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33737 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33738 From: Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Senate mail address: rejected ?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33739 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Senate mail address: rejected ?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33740 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33741 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Senate mail address: rejected ?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33742 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Senate mail address: rejected ?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33743 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33744 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33746 From: Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Date: 2005-02-17
Subject: Re: Senate mail address: rejected ? (Thanks)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33747 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-02-17
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33748 From: Salvia Sempronia Graccha Date: 2005-02-17
Subject: soror nova mea
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33749 From: Maxima Date: 2005-02-17
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33750 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2005-02-17
Subject: Report of the Caerimonia of the Quirinalia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33751 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-02-17
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33752 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-02-17
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33753 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2005-02-17
Subject: A question for our citizens in Italia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33754 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-18
Subject: Re: A question for our citizens in Italia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33756 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-02-18
Subject: Consular Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33757 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-02-18
Subject: Re: A question for our citizens in Italia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33758 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2005-02-18
Subject: Re: A question for our citizens in Italia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33759 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-02-18
Subject: FW: "Livius ut narrat verax".
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33760 From: Legion XXIV Date: 2005-02-18
Subject: Legion XXIV Vicesima Quarta Newslewtter Jan-Feb 2005
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33762 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-02-19
Subject: Ruins may support tale of Rome's origin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33764 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-02-20
Subject: Reminder: Cista open:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33765 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-20
Subject: Re: Reminder: Cista open: Vote AGAINST!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33766 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-20
Subject: Voting on the Resignation Law
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33767 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-02-20
Subject: Re: Voting on the Resignation Law Just say NO!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33768 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-02-20
Subject: Re: Voting on the Resignation Law Just say NO!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33769 From: Salvia Sempronia Graccha Date: 2005-02-20
Subject: Close call from viral message.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33770 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-21
Subject: Re: A question for our citizens in Italia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33771 From: TiAnO Date: 2005-02-21
Subject: Re: Consular Edict Tax Rates for 2758 a.u.c. / resignation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33773 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2005-02-21
Subject: Edictum XVII Brasiliae Provinciae - New legate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33774 From: KECTAM@aol.com Date: 2005-02-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 1824
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33775 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-02-21
Subject: ATTENTION: Invalid Vote in Comitia Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33776 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-02-21
Subject: ATTENTION: Invalid Votes in Comitia Populi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33777 From: mlcinnyc Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: a.d. VIII Kal. Mar.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33778 From: Reccanello Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Legião XXIV
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33779 From: Emilia Curia Finnica Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: family!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33780 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: family!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33781 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: family!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33782 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: family!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33783 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: family!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33784 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: family!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33785 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: Legião XXIV
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33786 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: Ruins may support tale of Rome's origin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33787 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: My congratulations and some special thanks
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33788 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: My congratulations and some special thanks
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33789 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: some special thanks
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33790 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: family!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33791 From: filipe Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Legião XXIV
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33792 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: family!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33793 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: Legião XXIV
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33794 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Mosaics Of Zeugma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33795 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Voting on the Resignation Law - just say NO!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33797 From: lucius_vitellius_triarius Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33798 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Tax payments info.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33799 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33800 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Lingua::Romana::Perligata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33801 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Citizenship approvals - again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33802 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Report of las Senate session - delayed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33803 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Gentes and familiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33804 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33805 From: Jack the Ripper Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Rif: [Nova-Roma] family!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33806 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Gentes and familiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33807 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33808 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Gentes and familiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33809 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Rif: [Nova-Roma] family!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33810 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Tribunes & Citizenship approvals
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33811 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Tribunes & Citizenship approvals
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33812 From: C. Fabia Livia Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Lingua::Romana::Perligata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33813 From: Numerius Gladius Bibulus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Lingua::Romana::Perligata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33814 From: C. Fabia Livia Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33815 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33816 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33817 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33818 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33819 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33820 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33821 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33822 From: C. Fabia Livia Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33823 From: aoctaviaindagatrix Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33824 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Fuscus on Gentes and Familiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33825 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: family!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33826 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33827 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: family!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33828 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33637 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Re: Not A Tribune
T. Octavius Salvius G. Equitio Catoni SPD

Salve,


> This is, in effect, co-optation to the tribunate. This is a
violation
> of Nova Roman law.
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato

Another point about this is that anyone could have been co-opted to
the tribunate.

When you resign your office you become a regular citizen without
extra power or responsibility. You have no more right to return to
your former office than someone who had never held that office.

vale

T. Octavius Salvius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33638 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: IM Contacts
Salve

I think I gave them out earlier in december, but since a couple of people
recently asked me for my IM contacts, and given I think a Tribunus must be
reachable in the closest form to talking that is allowed on the net, here are
my IM contacts:

YM: omegaalfa, domitius_constantinus_fuscus and guido_costantini (when I
connect, it connects randomly to one of those, so you might want to subscribe
all of them if you want to see me on every time I actually am)

MSN: moradan@...

AOL Messenger: romanflyke

ICQ: 731597

Anyone (but the couple of people I told to never contact me anymore), feel free
to contact me if you need/want to talk with this tribunus and I'll try my best
to make time.

Valete


Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33639 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Re: The Nova Roma Press
Salve
well i get my latin copys from
Egmont Ehapa Verlag GmbH, Berlin, Germany
Vale
Marcus Cornelus Felix


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Timothy P. Gallagher"
<spqr753@m...> wrote:
> Salve Manius Constantinus Serapio
>
> Thanks
>
> Do you know if we can obtain some Latin comics of Asterix and Obelix
for sale?
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Manius Constantinus Serapio<mailto:mcserapio@y...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2005 7:07 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Nova Roma Press
>
>
>
> AVE TI GALERI PAVLINE
>
> That's a great idea! :-)
> I fully support it!
>
> I remember Pinocchio (Pinoculus) has been translated into Latin as
> well. One can still find it sometimes on Ebay.
>
> BTW, if our intent is to increase the study of Latin, maybe it might
> be a good thing to make (only or also) easy translations for
> beginners (more or less like the Penguin small books for those who
> study English).
> I also remember the comics of Asterix and Obelix were translated
> into Latin. They were a nice thing for beginners :-)
>
> Congratulation Pauline. I'd give my full contribution to this
> project.
>
> OPTIME VALE
> M'C.Serapio
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/>
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33640 From: Marcus Minucius Audens Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Communications
Ladies and Gentlemen;

Just a brief note to notify anyone who might be interested that an
unknown "gremlin" has been at work, and I no longer have internet
access at my home. I am writing this message from the library where
I have established a temporary mailbox:

jmath669642reng@...

until I can straighten the mess out at home. Anyone who has tried to
contact me in the last few days I cannot access my Webtv mailbox om
the library -- I'm not sure why -- but apparently that is part of
the "fun!!!"

Respectfully;

Marcus Audens
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33642 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Re: The Lex Cornelia et Maria...
A. Apollonius Cordus Pompejae Minuciae Straboni
omnibusque sal.

> I was under the impression, by your many posts
> tonight that you were
> not accepting of the veto...the 72 hours was up this
> afternoon and
> it is well into the evening my time and even more
> into the evening
> your time. I know you do not agree with it, of
> course, but you seem
> to remain somewhat pursuant.

I accept it, because that's the only thing one can do
with a veto. I have continued discussing the issue,
it's true, but that's because it's never too late to
persuade a person that he's wrong.

> The only disturbing element for me is that I wish
> you had of been as
> vocal about the legal elements of all this back when
> the Lex
> Cornelia Maria was being amended...that was the time
> to speak up on
> the language, given that you were legal assensus to
> the Consul, and
> had a bounty of opportunity to be a change agent.
> And, frankly,
> even prior to this time your approach to the matter
> appeared rather
> tepid.

You're mistaken. I wasn't employed by any magistrate
last year.

Also, you seem to think that I have some problem with
the language of the lex Cornelia Maria. I have no
problem with it, and I see no need to amend it. It is
perfectly clear, and it has nothing to do with
resignation from office.

> Why the accuity of expressed concern on your part
> now is my only
> lingering question, and being that I expressed this
> concern
> yesterday and today and had not received a
> clarification or
> response, I figured you just didn't want to talk
> about it.

Yes, you didn't actually ask me, though, did you? You
just insinuated that I had some nefarious purpose. I
didn't realize that this was your way of asking me
what my purpose really was.

If that's what you want to know, the answer depends on
whether you're talking about my "acuity of expressed
concern" about the legal situation or what ought to be
done about it. These are, I'm sure you'll agree, two
different issues.

The reason I'm continuing to explain why there is
nothing illegal about my suggested solution is that I
rather hope (perhaps naively) that if I can persuade
the tribuni that it is not illegal, they will allow us
to try it.

The reason I'm continuing to explain why Saturninus is
not a tribune is that people are saying he is.

> In the meantime, it shall remain as unanswered as
> you wish it to be.
> I shall not push the issue. And I shall continue to
> live under the
> delusion that Saturninus is still a tribune with
> full potestas.

Well, if proving your arguments incorrect isn't enough
to stop you believing it, I shall stop trying!





___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33643 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Consular Edict Tax Rates for 2758 a.u.c.
Consular Edict Tax Rates for 2758 a.u.c.



Pursuant to the Senatus Consultum passed in November of 2755 a.u.c.,

http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2002-11-09-results.html

I, Gaius Popillius Laenas, hereby establish the tax rates for 2758.

I. Tax rates for 2758 are set according to the values in the
following table. Tax rates are shown for each Province. In the case
of Provinces that contain multiple macronational countries that do
not
share a currency (i.e. the euro), rates for macronational countries
are shown.


Rate in US Local Rate in Local
Provincae Dollars Currency Currency
Britannia $9.00 British Pound GBP 5.00
Gallia $10.00 Euro EUR 7.00
Germania $10.00 Euro EUR 8.00
Hibernia $10.00 Euro EUR 8.00
Hispania $7.00 Euro EUR 5.00
Italia $9.00 Euro EUR 7.00
Pannonia
Hungary $5.00 Forint HUF 879.00
Slovakia $4.00 Slovak Koruna SKK 132.00
Sarmatia $3.00 Russian Ruble RUR 83.00
Thule $10.00 Euro EUR 8.00
Venedia $4.00 Zloty PLN 12.00
America Austroccidentalis $13.00 US Dollar USD 13.00
America Austrorientalis $13.00 US Dollar USD 13.00
America Boreoccidentalis $13.00 US Dollar USD 13.00
America Medioccidentalis $13.00 US Dollar USD 13.00
California $13.00 US Dollar USD 13.00
Canada Occidentalis $10.00 Canadian Dollar CAD 12.00
Canada Orientalis $10.00 Canadian Dollar CAD 12.00
Lacus Magni $13.00 US Dollar USD 13.00
Mediatlantica $13.00 US Dollar USD 13.00
Mexico $3.00 Mexican Peso MXN 34.00
Nova Britannia $13.00 US Dollar USD 13.00
Argentina $4.00 Argentine Peso ARS 11.00
Brasilia $3.00 Real BRL 7.00
Australia $10.00 Austrailan Dollar AUD 13.00
Nigeria $0.30 Naira NGN 39.00
South Africa $4.00 Rand ZAR 21.00


Citizens in the macronational area of Northern Ireland who use the
British Pound may pay the rate listed for Britannia in pounds, or
the rate for Hibernia in euros.

Apparent discrepancies between USD amounts and Euro amounts are due
to rounding. The tax rates for each Province and macronational
country were calculated consistently.

A cive who must pay in a currency not listed above may contact the
Consul who may then calculate the appropriate rate.

II. The deadline for remittance of taxes is the last day of April.
Taxes may be remitted after that date, with a penalty of an extra
50%.
For example, a citizen who owes $13 USD would need to pay $19.50 USD
after the deadline.


III. Each provincial governor is required to copy this edict to his
or
her provincial lists (where applicable). Each of Nova Roma's official
Interpreters is required to translate this edict into the language(s)
for which they are responsible. The appendix to this edictum contains
advice to citizens and should be forwarded/translated with the main
document.


This edictum is effective immediately.

Given under my hand, this ___8th___ day of February, 2758 ab urbe
condita in the consulship of Fr. Apulus Caesar and G. Popillius
Laenas.


APPENDIX - Advice to Citizens

Taxes can be paid in a variety of ways.

Citizens remitting their taxes in US dollars may send a check, money
order, or equivalent form of payment made out to Nova Roma directly
to:

Nova Roma
PO Box 1897
Wells, ME 04090

Other citizens will need to purchase an international money order in
US dollars for the full amount of their taxes and send it to the
address above. Note that is impractical to cash individual checks in
local currencies and/or drawn on non-US banks. Such items should no
be sent to the address above.

Some provincial governors have chosen to arrange a central point in
their Provinces to which citizens may remit their taxes so that the
Province will only need to make a single payment to the central
treasury. Citizens are encouraged to contact their provincial
governor, if any, to find out whether their Province will be doing
this.

Provincial governors who follow this practice may choose to retain
one-half of the taxes collected in their Province for local use
according to the local budgets they have prepared. This will have
the advantage of avoiding fees to have funds for local expenditures
transmitted back to the Province.

All citizens capable of doing so may pay their taxes through the
PayPal service. There is a link on the Nova Roma Web site's main page
for this. It is the purple image alternately displaying "DONO DARE"
and "give to Nova Roma via PayPal" located beneath the main menu.

All citizens must be sure to include the full Roman names of all
citizens for whom they are paying with their remittance!

PayPal provides a comments field when you use it, and you can provide
the name(s) there. This will ensure that each civis who pays taxes
will be properly enrolled in the Assidui.

Questions may be addressed to the Consul at

gaiuspopilliuslaenas@y....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33644 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Re: The uncertain tribunate: the way forward
A. Apollonius Cordus L. Modio Kaelo omnibusque sal.

> Thank you for the correction. And I knew that too
> (or did, once upon
> a time), though the differentiation between the two
> I'm not fully
> aware of (except that in this case the Plebians
> obviously would endow
> him with tribunicia potestas; but I mean potestas in
> general and
> imperium).

Imperium and potestas are both 'packages' or more
specific legal powers. Imperium contains all the
powers which potestas contains, plus some more - it's
the deluxe package, if you like.

> But what I meant on the point you responded to
> earlier in your reply
> was they simply can't confirm him as a tribune (as
> he is not
> tribune).
>
> Rather, wouldn't the assembly have to endow him with
> his potestas by
> voting him in again (or alternately, voting on the
> law to install him
> a legitimate and verified tribune)?

The comitia can give him the tribunicia potestas by
passing a plebiscitum giving him tribunicia potestas.
This is essentially what an election is, it's just a
question of whether the tribuni plebis accept any
other candidates or not.

> Would it not be easier [in the court of public
> opinion] to have
> another election, whether he ran opposed or not? The
> Plebians will
> decide either way, but if election is an option, I
> would think it
> should be the favoured one. At least that would put
> the issue to
> bed.. completely.

It might be better in some ways, but in practical
terms it would not be easier. I'll try to explain why.

The majority of the tribuni plebis are of the opinion
that Saturninus is a tribune. Therefore, they do not
accept the existence of a vacancy. Since they do no
accept the existence of a vacancy, they can't be
expected to permit an election to be held, because an
election requires a vacancy.

The compromise solution I suggested was that a
plebiscitum be passed making Saturninus tribune. This
ought to be acceptable both to those who believe that
he already is a tribune (since it can be done even if
there is no vacancy - it will just be a legal
restatement of the current position) and to those who
believe that he is not tribune (since it will make him
tribune, thus filling the vacancy).

To my mind this ought to have been a near-perfect
compromise, since it would allow us to completely
bypass the question of Saturninus' current legal
status and go directly to making sure that, one way or
another, there is a full college of tribunes, without
anyone having to admit to making a mistake.

Regrettably, the compromise idea has itself proved to
be ineffective, since for some incomprehensible reason
two of the tribunes have decided that they will not
allow it. I can only assume that they aren't
interested in solving the problem at all.





___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33645 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Re: Lex Equitia de Civitate Ejuranda
A. Apollonius Cordus T. Octavio Pio omnibusque sal.

I'll quote your message more or less in full, because
your argument is quite detailed. My comments are at
the end.

> > In these cases, a vacancy occurs, even though
> there is no
> > léx which says that a vacancy can occur in this
> way. The
> > existence of the vacancy is not established by an
> explicit
> > statement of léx, but merely by common sense.
> >
> > So although the law does say that a person
> resigns from
> > office by resigning his citizenship, that doesn't
> > necessarily mean that this is the only way to
> resign from
> > office. This is confirmed by the fact that people
> have in
> > the past successfully resigned their offices
> without
> > resigning their citizenship.
>
> And here dies your argument. If you are willing to
> use common sense and
> past cases in interpreting the laws regarding
> resignation of offices,
> you should be willing to do the same when
> interpreting the Lex Cornelia
> et Maria. Let's spell it out explicitly, just for
> fun. Four alternatives:
>
> 1. We use common sense and past instances in both
> options. The current
> interpretation of the tribunes prevail, and
> Saturninus remains unchallenged.
>
> 2. We use common sense and past instances only
> regarding Lex Cornelia et
> Maria. Saturninus could not have resigned from his
> offices by other
> means than staying away for the full nine days.
> Saturninus remains
> unchallenged.
>
> 3. We use common sense and past instances only
> regarding resignation of
> offices. Saturninus resigned his offices but can't
> be reinstated as the
> law isn't fully clear on it. A new election is held.
>
> 4. We use common sense and past instances for
> interpreting neither
> situation. Saturninus could not have resigned his
> offices by other means
> than staying away for the full nine days. Saturninus
> remains unchallenged.
>
> Note that only the third instance goes against
> Saturninus' remaining
> tribune, and that option means that we use a curious
> set of double
> standards in order to get there, as would option
> two. The only two truly
> viable options are one and four, both of which keep
> Saturninus precisely
> WHERE THE OTHER TRIBUNES HAVE ALREADY CONFIRMED HIM.

You seem to think that I'm employing method number 3,
but in fact my method is number 1. Let me explain how
it goes.

We use common sense and past instances in both
options. So when we come to interpret the lex Cornelia
Maria, we use common sense and past instances as
follows:

Common sense: the lex Cornelia Maria says nothing
about any grace period for the resignation of a
magistracy, so there is no grace period for
resignation of a magistracy.

Past instances: the lex Cornelia Maria has never been
used as legal justification for allowing a resigned
magistrate to resume his office (see my detailed
explanation of the cases of Scaurus and Laenas), but
has in one past instance been interpreted as
preventing a resigned magistrate from resuming his
office (see my detailed explanation of the case of
Pompejus).

> I must admit I'm a bit confused why you would sink
> your own arguments by
> invoking common sense and past instances when
> defending your point of
> view, as you clearly oppose both and utilise a
> strictly legalistic
> approach when presenting it. Ah well.

I can understand why you're confused - it's because
you think that common sense and past instances are
incompatible with my interpretation of the law, and so
you're surprised that I advocate using them. But, as
I've explained, common sense and past instances
actually support my interpretation, so it's only
natural that I should use them!





___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33646 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Oath of office
Salve Romans

I, Timothy Paul Gallagher, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus do hereby solemnly swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Timothy Paul Gallagher, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Timothy Paul Gallagher, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Timothy Paul Gallagher, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus swear to protect and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Timothy Paul Gallagher, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus further swear to fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of Quaestor to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept the position of Quaestor and all the rights, privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.

Given on this eighth day of February in the Consulship of Franciscus Apulus Caesar and Gaius Popillius Laenas, 2758 A U C





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33647 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Oath of Office
Salvete,

I, Richard Arthur Malley, Quintus Cassius Calvus, do hereby solemnly
swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the
best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Richard Arthur Malley, Quintus
Cassius Calvus, swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my
public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and
private life.

I, Richard Arthur Malley, Quintus Cassius Calvus, swear to uphold and
defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and
swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as the
State Religion.

I, Richard Arthur Malley, Quintus Cassius Calvus, swear to protect
and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Richard Arthur Malley, Quintus Cassius Calvus, further swear to
fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of
Magister Aranearius to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the
Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor,
do I accept the position of Magister Aranearius and all the rights,
privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.

Given on this eighth day of February in the Consulship of Franciscus
Apulus Caesar and Gaius Popillius Laenas, 2758 A U C

Vale,

Quintus Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33648 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Congratulations!
Salve Romans

My sincere congratulations to Quintus Cassius Calvus on his election as Magister Aranearius and to Senator Marcus Tiberius Minucius Audens on his election as
EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM

Nova Roma could not have done better and is fortunate these citizens are willing to serve her as magistrates.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33649 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Apollonia Blogum
Salvete,

please note that this blog can now be accessed by XML.
All profits made will be given to the Magna Mater project.

http://www.fr-novaroma.com/Archeology/

Valete,

Sextus Apollonius Scipio



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33650 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Tax Rate for Romania
Salvete Quirites,

The macronational country of Romania is not currently part of a
Provincer and its tax rate was not published in the recent edict.

For our cives living there the 2758 a.u.c. tax rate is:

$2.00 USD
68.00 Leu (ROL)

Valete,

G. Popillius Laenas
Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33651 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Re: Apollonia Blogum
Salve Apollonius Scipio !

A great work. Congratulations !

VALE,
IVL SABINVS

Sextus Apollonius Scipio <scipio_apollonius@...> wrote:
Salvete,

please note that this blog can now be accessed by XML.
All profits made will be given to the Magna Mater project.

http://www.fr-novaroma.com/Archeology/

Valete,

Sextus Apollonius Scipio



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com

Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
document.write('');

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33652 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Re: Tax Rate for Romania
SALVE CONSULE !

Thank you for your promptness. I already republish your post in NRDacia - group.

VALE,
IVL SABINVS
DACIA PROVINCE

gaiuspopilliuslaenas <gaiuspopilliuslaenas@...> wrote:

Salvete Quirites,

The macronational country of Romania is not currently part of a
Provincer and its tax rate was not published in the recent edict.

For our cives living there the 2758 a.u.c. tax rate is:

$2.00 USD
68.00 Leu (ROL)

Valete,

G. Popillius Laenas
Consul




Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
document.write('');

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
All your favorites on one personal page � Try My Yahoo!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33653 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Etruscans?
Avete Quirites;
I was just over at the Nova Roma Italia list and there was a great
post by Consul Caesar, from the Italian magazine "Living Archeology,"
on the results of DNA testing. The modern day Tuscans are not even
close relatives of the Etruscans. Researchers from the Universities
of Bologna and Florence did the tests. So what happened to the
Etruscans, where did they go? Fascinating..
optime valete
M.Hortensia Maior TRP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33654 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: 'Jesus was Caesar': New book by Philosopher and Linguist Francesco
Salvete Quirites,

Lunacy strikes again! I wouldn't recommend this as serious reading, but
the web blurb does make for great humor.

http://tinyurl.com/6jouu

If conspiracy theories are the sophistication of the ignorant, this guy
would seem to be pretty sophisticated!

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33655 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: Re: Congratulations!
Salve,

Thank you and congratulations to you as well.

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Timothy P. Gallagher"
<spqr753@m...> wrote:
> Salve Romans
>
> My sincere congratulations to Quintus Cassius Calvus on his
election as Magister Aranearius and to Senator Marcus Tiberius
Minucius Audens on his election as
> EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM
>
> Nova Roma could not have done better and is fortunate these
citizens are willing to serve her as magistrates.
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33656 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-02-08
Subject: A quick thank you.
Salvete,

My thanks to all who came out to vote and those that have extended
their congratulations on the outcome of the elections. I'll do my
best to maintain the website and address ongoing problems there in.
I can't promise and won't promise overnight miracles as with the new
family legislation the current database structure is obsolete. The
Censor's office has been keeping manual records of the recent
emancipations and formation of families and domiciles within the
current gens as well as addressing some other concerns with the
database.

Devising a new database structure will take some time and I ask for
some patience. I've put out some feelers towards people with talent
in this area hopefully someone will take the bait. <G> It is much
easier to take extra time to do something right than it is to take
extra time to fix it after the fact. Some would say I'm
interminably slow, I prefer to think of it as being methodical.

On a brighter note the translation of the citizen application forms
into Italian is just about complete. The forms are functional in
Italian now but there are a handful of error messages that need to
be translated and put into place. My thanks to Manius Constantinus
Serapio for all his hard work in the translation effort. The next
stop in the translation process will be translating the citizenship
application forms into Spanish.

Valete,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33658 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-02-09
Subject: Payment unclaimed
Salvete,

On the 14 of january, I made a donation of 10 euros to the Magna Mater project through
paypal to payments@.... To this date, the payment remains unclaimed. For paypal,
it could be that the email adress is not validated. Could you check?

Valete,

Sextus Apollonius Scipio




__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33659 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2005-02-09
Subject: Re: Etruscans?
SALVE M HORTENSIA MAIOR

(I do live in Pisa, where Arno river passes through; it happens to
be the ancient, historical northern border of Etruria, where used to
live Etruscans)

About this almost fabulous people, the vast majority of historians
agree with the fact that we have totally lost their roots, and that
many of their characteristics are not clear to us. I obviously
cannot answer to your questions (many books have been written about
this topic, I can forward you some of their titles), but I indeed
think that one of reasons is that in Tuscany beginning from Romans
passed so many different cultures, conquerors and populations, so
that these roots got lost. This is indeed a characteristic of the
all ancient and medieval history of Italy, but I don't know why in
other places of my nation this did not happen, and we can still see
some traits of the ancient local population.

BENE VALE
L IUL SULLA

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> Avete Quirites;
> I was just over at the Nova Roma Italia list and there was a
great
> post by Consul Caesar, from the Italian magazine "Living
Archeology,"
> on the results of DNA testing. The modern day Tuscans are not even
> close relatives of the Etruscans. Researchers from the
Universities
> of Bologna and Florence did the tests. So what happened to the
> Etruscans, where did they go? Fascinating..
> optime valete
> M.Hortensia Maior TRP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33660 From: Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Date: 2005-02-09
Subject: Re: Payment unclaimed
Salvete Omnes,

As Aedilician Quaestor, I confirm I am not informed of any donation
to the MM Project since January 1, 2005.

Valete !

Lucius Rutilius Minervalis
Provinciae Galliae Propraetor
Aedilician Quaestor


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Sextus Apollonius Scipio
<scipio_apollonius@y...> wrote:
> Salvete,
>
> On the 14 of january, I made a donation of 10 euros to the Magna
Mater project through
> paypal to payments@n... To this date, the payment remains
unclaimed. For paypal,
> it could be that the email adress is not validated. Could you check?
>
> Valete,
>
> Sextus Apollonius Scipio
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33661 From: Jack the Ripper Date: 2005-02-09
Subject: Rif: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman food gods/goddesses
Ave, Kaelus! Avete, omnes!
I would thank all the cives who helped me in this research.
Well, almost all of my friends are Christians and last saturday 3 of 'em
asked me to pray for food; I said only these three simple words "Bless this
food", with no referral to any god.
Now I can pray the right god.


Valete Optime,

Qvintvs Fabivs Allectvs (aka Alecto)
Pater Familias Fabiae Alectae
Civis NovaRomanus Italicus - http://italia.novaroma.org
Tirone Legio I Italica - Villadose (RO) - http://www.legio-i-italica.it
Cogito, ergo sum - http://jacktheripper1984.splinder.com



-------Messaggio originale-------

Da: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Data: 02/07/05 22:57:18
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman food gods/goddesses


Salve;

The answer more depends on what you're specifically asking.
But you can pray to any god, for any reason. You can also dedicate a
meal or give thanks to any god/dess you please, or who you think
helped give you such bounty. If it is cooked and/or eaten in the
home, you should probably thank Vesta and the household deities
(lares, penates, even mares).

But there is really no restriction, or "right" way, or "correct"
divinity to pray to. This is an informal sort of prayer, and not a
ritual. There are rituals based in a particular cultus or within
some familial traditions, but you're not explicitly bound to
anything.

Also, you can offer up the food beforehand, and then profane it
before eating it, probably giving some as a burnt-offering before it
is profaned. Or just pour a libation to any or all of the gods
(though it might be preferable to single out Iupiter as the foremost
god to give thanks to, as he is the 'king' of the Dii Immortales).

If you want something more specific based on some particular
practise or context, just ask.

Vale,
Kaelus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Jack the Ripper" <peaceboy@l...>
wrote:
> Avete, omnes!
> Is there any greek and/or roman god and/or goddess to pray for the
food we
> are going to eating?
>
>
> Valete Optime,
>
> Qvintvs Fabivs Allectvs (aka Alecto)
> Pater Familias Fabiae Alectae
> Civis NovaRomanus Italicus - http://italia.novaroma.org
> Tirone Legio I Italica - Villadose (RO) - http://www.legio-i-
italica.it
> Cogito, ergo sum - http://jacktheripper1984.splinder.com
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT






Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33662 From: Lucius Apollonius Clement Date: 2005-02-09
Subject: A.D.62 : Pompeii - Strongly recommended.
Lucius Apollonius Clemens Omnibus S.P.D.

Salvete Omnes !

I come to you to recommend the reading of the book 'A.D.62 : Pompeii',
written by Rebecca East.

Written as a novel, the book presents the adventure of a 21st century
woman who travels to the past and arrives in Pompeii a few years before
its destruction. The story about the time-travelling machine is kept very
brief and not much detail is given about it. The book focuses on the
feelings and experience of its main character as she arrives in a Roman
world and sees the world through her 21st century way of thinking.

The novel is very easy to read and I could easily identify myself with the
character (although she is a woman, her 21st century origins make her look
very close to us, and I soon focused on what she saw around her, as if I
was there myself), appreciating then evering single detail, every single
encounter and roman talk that she conducted for me.

This was a fantastic experience. Max Gallo had taken me very close to
Julius Caesar in his book 'Caesar Imperator', but this was definitely a
journey to meet the common people and it revealed a lot of details about
the everyday life in Pompeii and how different it is depending on whose
life is observed (slave, freedmam, a daughter, a son, a matron, a
peterfamilias..).

Rebecca East changed a part of my understanding of history into a
collection of memories and I can't wait for her to release another book :)

For your pleasure, I strongly recommend the reading of this book. You can
find details about it here :

http://www.rebecca-east.com/index.html

And you can buy it on Amazon here :

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/059526882X/qid%3D1046655678/sr%3D11-1/ref%3Dsr%5F11%5F1/002-8634462-4112055

Well, I'm back to the cold historical analysis of Pierre Grimal now (which
is nonetheless enjoyable as well, don't take me wrong !) :)

Valete,

Lucius Apollonius Clemens.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33663 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-09
Subject: Re: A.D.62 : Pompeii - Strongly recommended.
Salve Luci Apolloni, et salvete Quirites,

Lucius Apollonius Clement wrote:

> I come to you to recommend the reading of the book 'A.D.62 : Pompeii',
> written by Rebecca East.

Yes, it is a lovely little book, isn't it?

I've taken the liberty of forwarding your post to the author. I'm sure
she will appreciate it.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33665 From: Dan Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: Re: Etruscans?
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> Avete Quirites;
> I was just over at the Nova Roma Italia list and there was a great
> post by Consul Caesar, from the Italian magazine "Living
Archeology,"
> on the results of DNA testing. The modern day Tuscans are not even
> close relatives of the Etruscans. Researchers from the Universities
> of Bologna and Florence did the tests. So what happened to the
> Etruscans, where did they go? Fascinating..
> optime valete
> M.Hortensia Maior TRP

KAELUS: I'm not entirely sure, but I've read lots of conjecture in my
recent research regarding the various manifestations of Fulfuns
within Roman cultural art and religion... and most of those theories
are pretty vague and based on scant archeological evidence.

The Etruscans persisted as haruspecies employed during the Republican
period for quite some time until the Romans established their own
college of Etruscan divination. So obviously there were a decent
amount who survived the fall of Etruria and were eventually absorbed
into Roman society as a whole.

But from most of the opinions that I've heard, the Etruscans were
decimated around 400 BCE by Gaulish Celts, probably more so than is
represented in historical accounts. After the Po valley was
conquered, most probably started to migrate elsewhere for fear of
their safety. It's assumed that they scattered throughout Italy and
abroad (north and eastbound, most likely), away from their
traditional homeland as the Romans and their Latin allies settled the
areas in which they formerly lived while conquering those who
remained (and probably selling most of the survivors into slavery).

I don't think anyone really knows, but the theory presented above is
a fairly good guess.

Vale,
Kaelus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33666 From: Lucius Apollonius Clement Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: Re: A.D.62 : Pompeii - Strongly recommended.
It was bcc'd to her already :)

Lucius

> Salve Luci Apolloni, et salvete Quirites,
>
> Lucius Apollonius Clement wrote:
>
> > I come to you to recommend the reading of the book 'A.D.62 : Pompeii',
> > written by Rebecca East.
>
> Yes, it is a lovely little book, isn't it?
>
> I've taken the liberty of forwarding your post to the author. I'm sure
> she will appreciate it.
>
> Vale,
>
> -- Marinus
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT
> document.write('');
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33667 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: Re: A.D.62 : Pompeii - Strongly recommended
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes.

I just got my copy of "Pompeii: The Last Day" on DVD, and was somewhat
disheartened by the fact that they didn't all escape. I can't help
but feel that if they'd spent their time watching the Discovery
Channel instead of, say, "SURVIVOR: Cisalpine Gaul", they'd have
understood what was going on and gotten away...


Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33668 From: immaculo@bellsouth.net Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: Re: A.D.62 : Pompeii - Strongly recommended
Salve,
I have to agree with you. Accept, I believe those Gladiators watched a little too much Fear Factor. When the one went walking out while rocks were falling from the sky....Fear was definitely not a factor for him.
Vale,
Servia Iulia Caesaris Metelliana
----- Original Message -----
From: gaiusequitiuscato
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 9:41 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A.D.62 : Pompeii - Strongly recommended



OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes.

I just got my copy of "Pompeii: The Last Day" on DVD, and was somewhat
disheartened by the fact that they didn't all escape. I can't help
but feel that if they'd spent their time watching the Discovery
Channel instead of, say, "SURVIVOR: Cisalpine Gaul", they'd have
understood what was going on and gotten away...


Valete bene,

Cato






Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33669 From: Marcus Audens Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: "Aquila"
Citizens of Nova Roma;

I come before you to announce the January Issue of "Aquila." My apologies for the lateness of this issue, but a combination of events have worked against us. I must give proper due to the Honored Senior Consul and his excellent staff for thier efforts in publishing this newsletter. They have created a new website for "Aquila", and have come up with some new ideas for the newsletter as well.

I than them most effusively for thier work in this area. We have n the "Aquila" staff a new Religious Editor, ProConsul and Pontiff Astur, who has stepped forward to fill the vacancy left by the resignation of his predesessor. My thanks for Senator Astur's willingness to fill this difficult position.

The website for the 2005 "Aquila" is

www.novaroma.org/aquila?

Please enjoy this newsletter, and I will be pleased to recieve all comments regarding "Aquila."

Very Respectfully;
Your Literary Servant;

Marcus Minucius-Tiberius Audens -- Editor Commentarium -- "Aquila" -- Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33670 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: Fwd: Re: athena statue
--Salvete omnes;
I'm forwarding this from the Hellenic-Pagan list. I really enjoyed
seeing these statues painted as they would be. The Danish link works
fine, so
enjoy and watch out for those colours!
optime valete
M. Hortensia Maior


- In HellenicPagan@yahoogroups.com, "amyntoros" <York51@a...> wrote:


I might be taking this subject a little too far off-topic, but it
could be relevant if anyone was considering painting their own
statues of the gods. :-)

I've always been interested in the fact that the ancient Greeks and
Romans painted all their statues, probably because I studied art at
college, lo these many years ago.  I found out about an exhibition -
I believe at the Vatican museum - where statues in their possession
were copied and then painted with the original colours according to
remanants of paint found upon them.  There is an Athena amongst these
(obviously not the Parthenon Athena), and though she is only
partially painted, the colours are quite startling.  To say that the
colours on all these statues are garish is an understatement!

The last site below includes a link to a Guardian article which gives
details in English about the reconstructions.  However, the Guardian
link often locks up my computer and I have to reboot.  This happens
to me regularly with any news from the Guardian, although I don't
know of anyone else who has the same problem.  Still, I thought I
should warn you.

http://www.rivistadiequipeco.it/Eventi/Vat_coloridelbianco/museivatica
ni_2.htm

http://www.nyborg-gym.dk/uv/oldtidskundskab/classicolor/index.html

http://www.laputanlogic.com/articles/2004/11/025-0001-8548.html
--- End forwarded message ---
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33671 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: Help on internet programming needed
Salvete,

I got an offer from a rather good antiquity online store consisting of a 5% donation of
any sale done through a referral link. This store do not have a referral program nor the
technical knowledge to provide any solution. I think I should give it a try and I would
like to know if any of you could give advices in order to implement such a link. Profits,
if any, will be of course given to NR.
Thanks in advance.

Valete,

Sextus Apollonius Scipio



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33672 From: Caius Minucius Scaevola Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: Re: Help on internet programming needed
Caius Minucius Scaevola Sextus Apollonius Scipio S.D.

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:09:06PM -0800, Sextus Apollonius Scipio wrote:
>
> Salvete,
>
> I got an offer from a rather good antiquity online store consisting of a 5% donation of
> any sale done through a referral link. This store do not have a referral program nor the
> technical knowledge to provide any solution. I think I should give it a try and I would
> like to know if any of you could give advices in order to implement such a link. Profits,
> if any, will be of course given to NR.
> Thanks in advance.

Shifted to private email.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Alea iacta est!
Let the dice fly!
-- Julius Caesar, at the Rubicon
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33673 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: Decreta announcement
Ex Officio L Equitius Cincinnatus Augur Quiritibus salutem dicit

Avete,

On behalf of the College Pontificum:


I. Decretum de Feria Fornacalia

QVOD BONVM FAVSTVM FELIX FORTVNATVMQVE SIT POPVLO ROMANO QUIRITIBVS. The Collegium Pontificum having met in order to set the dates of the Feria Fornicalia, the decision was that: the rites of the Feria Fornicalia in the year MMDCCLVIII AUC shall be observed in the period a.d. III Id. Feb. (Feb. 11) through a.d. XIV Kal. Mar. (Feb. 16).


II. Decretum on Removal of Pontifices.

QVOD BONVM FAVSTVM FELIX FORTVNATVMQVE SIT POPVLO ROMANO QUIRITIBVS. The Collegium Pontificum having met in order to comply with the Decretum on Collegium Pontificum Minimum Requirements, the decision was that:

Gnaeus Tarquinius Caesar and Marcus Arcadius Pius are stricken from the
Collegium Pontificum in accordance with the Decretum on Collegium Pontificum Minimum requirements.

ante diem IV Idus Februarias MMDCCLVIII auc (10 Feb 2005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Both Decreta were passed unanimously (8 Vti Rogas), excepting those Pontifices who have not been heard from in years.
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/pontifices/2002-04-18.html
Not voting:
Gnaeus Tarquinius Caesar
Marcus Arcadius Pius

Valete

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33674 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2005-02-10
Subject: Re: Decreta announcement
Salvete

Did M.Arcadius Pius lost his position of Flamen
Portunalis as well?

Valete
M.Arminius

--- Lucius Equitius <vergil96@...> escreveu:
>
> Ex Officio L Equitius Cincinnatus Augur Quiritibus
> salutem dicit
>
> Avete,
>
> On behalf of the College Pontificum:
[..]
> II. Decretum on Removal of Pontifices.
[..]
> Gnaeus Tarquinius Caesar and Marcus Arcadius Pius
> are stricken from the
> Collegium Pontificum in accordance with the Decretum
> on Collegium Pontificum Minimum requirements.
> Valete






_______________________________________________________
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Instale o discador do Yahoo! agora. http://br.acesso.yahoo.com/ - Internet rápida e grátis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33675 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: a.d. III Id. Feb.
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Today is ante diem III Idus Februarius; the day is Nefastus.

"Rident stolidi verba Latina." (Fools laugh at the Latin language) -
Ovid

In accordance with the decretum from the College of Pontiffs, today is
the celebration of the Fornicalia*. It was celebrated at the
level of the curiae (at least originally akin to the modern sense of
ward or even neighborhood). Every curia had a leader (the curio - at
least 50 years old and elected for life) and a citizen charged with
ensuring the observence of curial religious feasts (called the flamen
- but not technically a priest). The thirty curiones collectively
comprised the college of curiones, the head of which was the curio
maximus (the "most important curio" - until the end of the 3rd century
B.C. always a patrician). Every curia had its own meeting house where
members met to celebrate curial feast days. These, even the glory days
of Rome, were always simple, homey places - no silver goblets, the
offerings were cakes of grain and perhaps some first fruits. Every
year the curio maximus announced the date of the Fornicalia and posted
a separate notice for each curia in the Forum, probably indicating
where each curia should gather for the final part of the celebration.
We think that every family in the curia brought far (spelt - a kind of
grain) to be toasted at the meeting hall and sacrificed to ensure that
the household ovens wouldn't be burnt in the coming year. Then the
curiae assembled for a collective feast.

On February 17th, if anyone had forgotten the feast or didn't remember
which curiae he belonged to, he could make a private sacrifice at the
Quirinalia, a general assembly of all the curiae. The Romans called
the Quirinalia the "Feast of Fools."

*Special thanks to M. Calidius Gracchus for hunting down the
information regarding the Fornicalia!

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33676 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: Join NR Latin America List
Salvete,

From citizens from its provinces, decendents, lovers and scholars of
the latins on the New World, there is a old NR list:

NRlatinamerica-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

Valete bene in pacem deorum,
L. Arminius Faustus
Propraetor Brasiliae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33677 From: J Auger Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: Academia Thules
Salvete omnes,

Does anybody know anything about Academia Thules? I applied to them a few weeks ago and have not received a response. Any information would be appreciated. Thank you.

Valete bene,
Gallus Cassius Augurius




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33678 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: Re: Etruscans?
What about the Romans themselves? Is there any
indication that Republican Roman genes/ blood / DNA is
present in folks?
--- 21aprile@... <21aprile@...> wrote:
>
> SALVE M HORTENSIA MAIOR
>
> (I do live in Pisa, where Arno river passes through;
it happens to
> be the ancient, historical northern border of
Etruria, where used to
> live Etruscans)
>
> About this almost fabulous people, the vast majority
of historians
> agree with the fact that we have totally lost their
roots, and that
> many of their characteristics are not clear to us. I
obviously
> cannot answer to your questions (many books have
been written about
> this topic, I can forward you some of their titles),
but I indeed
> think that one of reasons is that in Tuscany
beginning from Romans
> passed so many different cultures, conquerors and
populations, so
> that these roots got lost. This is indeed a
characteristic of the
> all ancient and medieval history of Italy, but I
don't know why in
> other places of my nation this did not happen, and
we can still see
> some traits of the ancient local population.
>
> BENE VALE
> L IUL SULLA
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior"
<rory12001@y...> wrote:
> >
> > Avete Quirites;
> > I was just over at the Nova Roma Italia list and
there was a
> great
> > post by Consul Caesar, from the Italian magazine
"Living
> Archeology,"
> > on the results of DNA testing. The modern day
Tuscans are not even
> > close relatives of the Etruscans. Researchers from
the
> Universities
> > of Bologna and Florence did the tests. So what
happened to the
> > Etruscans, where did they go? Fascinating..
> > optime valete
> > M.Hortensia Maior TRP
>
>
>


=====
S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33679 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: Re: Academia Thules
CN·SALVIVS·ASTVR·GAL·CASSIO·S·P·D

S·V·B·E·E·V

> Does anybody know anything about Academia Thules? I applied to them a > few weeks ago and have not received a response. Any information would be
> appreciated. Thank you.
>
> Valete bene,
> Gallus Cassius Augurius

I am one of the officers of the Academia. Please contact me privately.

BENE·VALETE·TV·TVIQVE·OMNES

CN·SALVIVS·T·F·A·NEP·OVF·ASTVR·SCRIPSIT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33680 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: Digest Number 1817
L Equitius Cincinnatus Augur M Arminio Maiori salutem dicit

Salve

"Did M.Arcadius Pius lost his position of Flamen Portunalis as well?"

Good question. The answer is, not yet.

The college hasn't gotten to this yet.
PRIESTHOOD ASSIDUI STATUS REQUIREMENT
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/pontifices/2003-11-02-i.htm

We have been simply spending too much time and effort administering these
types of situations.
Each time this happens it's necessitating changes to records (century points
etc, website updates, new appointments or elections). Just like citizens and
magistrates who resign or simply walk away, we spend too much time and
effort on people who have *nothing invested* in the success of Nova Roma.
I've advocated a more stringent application policy since 1998. I know many
people don't like the idea of standards to attain citizenship, but really we
must adopt something. It's just totally unfair to place the burden on the
rest of us citizens. We've been dealing with this issue for too long.
I've always thought the webform was a bad idea. I continue to believe that
an actual *signed* form is best. Then a 'provisional' citizenship pending
payment of "taxes" and a nonrefundable 'processing fee'.
I really don't believe we would have too many fewer serious citizens than we
have now. Sure we wouldn't have over 2K files to maintain, but that wouldn't
be a bad thing. This is a real problem. People are going to have to take
these commitments more seriously.

Just venting. We'll go through the records after the tax collection and see
who needs to be removed and vote on it.

Valete

Message: 7
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 01:04:07 -0300 (ART)
From: M Arminius Maior <marminius@...>
Subject: Re: Decreta announcement

Salvete

Did M.Arcadius Pius lost his position of Flamen
Portunalis as well?

Valete
M.Arminius

--- Lucius Equitius <vergil96@...> escreveu:
>
> Ex Officio L Equitius Cincinnatus Augur Quiritibus
> salutem dicit
>
> Avete,
>
> On behalf of the College Pontificum:
[..]
> II. Decretum on Removal of Pontifices.
[..]
> Gnaeus Tarquinius Caesar and Marcus Arcadius Pius
> are stricken from the
> Collegium Pontificum in accordance with the Decretum
> on Collegium Pontificum Minimum requirements.
> Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33681 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: FYI
Salve Romans

FYI

A web site you may fine useful


http://www.members.aol.com/TeacherNet/AncientRome.html<http://www.membersaol.com/TeacherNet/AncientRome.html>

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33682 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: Re: FYI
Salve Tiberi Galeri, et salvete quirites,

Timothy P. Gallagher wrote:

> A web site you may fine useful
>
>
> http://www.members.aol.com/TeacherNet/AncientRome.html

Unfortunately a large number of the links seem to be out of date. I got
a lot of 404 "this page not found" errors. But thanks for the pointer.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33683 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: Re: Genetic descent from Romans?
Salve Marce Flavi,

You asked:

> What about the Romans themselves? Is there any
> indication that Republican Roman genes/ blood / DNA is
> present in folks?

I recall that Diana Octavia has said something about having taken some
sort of DNA test that showed she has the (mitochondrial?) DNA of Romans
from Roma Antiqua. A quick search of the web reveals these three
interesting websites:

1. Genetic Haplogroups (a part of the Lindsay clan website touching on
Roman and other genetics in British people)

http://www.clanlindsay.com/genetic_haplogroups.htm

2. Best of Sicily - Genetics

http://www.bestofsicily.com/genetics.htm

3. Sicilian Peoples - the Romans

http://www.bestofsicily.com/mag/art159.htm

I'm sure there's much more out there if one has the time and inclination
to look for it.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33684 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2005-02-11
Subject: Re: Digest Number 1817
Salve

Ah, i understand.
I thought that, if the Flamen Portunalis is a member
of the Collegium Pontificum (NR Constitution, VI.B.1),
and the language of the last decreta says "and M.
Arcadius Pius are stricken from the Collegium
Pontificum", he loses simulteanously both positions.

--- Lucius Equitius <vergil96@...> escreveu:
>
> L Equitius Cincinnatus Augur M Arminio Maiori
> salutem dicit
> Salve
> "Did M.Arcadius Pius lost his position of Flamen
> Portunalis as well?"
> Good question. The answer is, not yet.
[..]
> Valete

Vale
M.Arminius





_______________________________________________________
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Instale o discador do Yahoo! agora. http://br.acesso.yahoo.com/ - Internet rápida e grátis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33686 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-02-12
Subject: Re: Digest Number 1817
A. Apollonius Cordus M. Arminio Majori omnibusque sal.

> I thought that, if the Flamen Portunalis is a member
> of the Collegium Pontificum (NR Constitution,
> VI.B.1),
> and the language of the last decreta says "and M.
> Arcadius Pius are stricken from the Collegium
> Pontificum", he loses simulteanously both positions.

In historical terms, the only flamines who were
members of the collegium pontificum were the three
flamines majores: the flamen Dialis, the flamen
Martialis, and the flamen Quirinalis.

It's true that the constitution says that all the
flamines are members of the collegium, but perhaps the
flamines minores would be better considered associate
members (since they can't vote) rather than full members.





___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33687 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2005-02-12
Subject: Digest No 1818
L Equitius Cincinnatus Augur Quiritibus salutem dicit

Salvete

Like so many things in Nova Roma we're in a period of development where it's
necessary to make adaptations. We get more applications for 'Pontifex' than
for all the other priesthood positions combined.
I came up with the idea that applicants should hold a flaminate for a number
of months, or maybe a year of two, prior to being eligible to be considered
for the College proper.

http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/pontifices/2003-11-02-ii.htm
...The Collegium Pontificum is the guiding body of the Nova Roma Priesthood
as well as the Religio Romana, and therefore it is important that Pontifices
should have direct Priesthood experience through practical service.
Pontifices raised before this date and do not hold a Priesthood are
encouraged but not required to apply for a secondary priesthood;...

________________________________________________________________________

Message: 9
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:25:10 +0000 (GMT)
From: "A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...>
Subject: Re: Digest Number 1817

A. Apollonius Cordus M. Arminio Majori omnibusque sal.

> I thought that, if the Flamen Portunalis is a member
> of the Collegium Pontificum (NR Constitution,
> VI.B.1),
> and the language of the last decreta says "and M.
> Arcadius Pius are stricken from the Collegium
> Pontificum", he loses simulteanously both positions.

In historical terms, the only flamines who were
members of the collegium pontificum were the three
flamines majores: the flamen Dialis, the flamen
Martialis, and the flamen Quirinalis.

L Equitius: Who, by the way, were also Senatores.
I am a Senator, but alas the Flamen Quirinalis is not. He has met other
requirments for inclusion in the Senate too, but is being persecuted on
account of personal vendettas and of his 'zealous' defense of the
religio.

It's true that the constitution says that all the
flamines are members of the collegium, but perhaps the
flamines minores would be better considered associate
members (since they can't vote) rather than full members.

L Equitius: Only Gaius Modius Athanasius is Flamen Minor who is also a
Pontifex.
I do agree with you in principle Cordus, and in fact the other Flamen
Minores are non voting members.
They are, or should be, subscribed to the
NRCollegiumPontificum@yahoogroups.com and are always welcome to comment and
bring items to the college for discussion.

Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33688 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-12
Subject: Has anyone read this?
Salvete Quirites,

I'm wondering if anyone here has read this book.

Classical Living: Reconnecting With the Rituals for Ancient Rome
by Frances Bernstein

http://tinyurl.com/5xuph

The book was mentioned in one of the other Roman web communities I read,
and seems to be well regarded. Has anyone here in NR read it?

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33689 From: Samantha Date: 2005-02-12
Subject: Announcement: Temple of Diana Project list open
Salvete,
This is just a general announcement to let people know that the
previously private temple of Diana list is now open upon request of
membership. It is place for those who worship the goddess Diana to
share thoughts, research etc.
You can find us at :
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/templeofdianaproject

Valete bene
Lucia Modia Lupa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33690 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-12
Subject: Re: Has anyone read this?
M.Hortensia Maior Censori Marino spd;
I haven't read it , but the author posted twice last year at the
Religio Group, check the archives Marine, I think she was interested
in the ruins to Isis at Cumae.
optime vale
Maior
>
> Classical Living: Reconnecting With the Rituals for Ancient Rome
> by Frances Bernstein
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5xuph
>
> The book was mentioned in one of the other Roman web communities I
read,
> and seems to be well regarded. Has anyone here in NR read it?
>
> Valete,
>
> -- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33691 From: Julilla Sempronia Magna Date: 2005-02-12
Subject: Re: Has anyone read this?
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@c...> wrote:
> Salvete Quirites,
>
> I'm wondering if anyone here has read this book.
>
> Classical Living: Reconnecting With the Rituals for Ancient Rome
> by Frances Bernstein

I have not only read it, I own it. I believe what Bernstein attempts
to do with "Classical Living" is not so much recreate specific
rituals but illustrate ways of living in the rhythm and balance of a
live lived in harmony with the Roman calendar. It's a nice companion
piece to the more substantive works such as John Scheid's "An
Introduction to Roman Religion" and "Dictionary of Roman Religion" by
Lesley and Roy Adkins.

valete,

Julilla Sempronia Magna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33693 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-13
Subject: Re: Has anyone read this?
Salve Julilla, et salvete quirites,

Julilla Sempronia Magna wrote:
[about]
>>Classical Living: Reconnecting With the Rituals for Ancient Rome
>>by Frances Bernstein
>
>
> I have not only read it, I own it. I believe what Bernstein attempts
> to do with "Classical Living" is not so much recreate specific
> rituals but illustrate ways of living in the rhythm and balance of a
> live lived in harmony with the Roman calendar. It's a nice companion
> piece to the more substantive works such as John Scheid's "An
> Introduction to Roman Religion" and "Dictionary of Roman Religion" by
> Lesley and Roy Adkins.

Thank you. I think I'll add it to my wishlist.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33694 From: Nabarz Date: 2005-02-13
Subject: Women in Britain's Roman Army
Hi,

This piece from The Times newspaper might be of interest to some.

Regards,
N.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Women Warriors From Amazon
Fought For Britains Roman Army
By Lewis Smith
The Times - UK
22.12.2004

The remains of two Amazon warriors serving with the Roman army in
Britain have been discovered in a cemetery that has astonished
archaeologists. Women soldiers were previously unknown in the Roman
army in Britain and the find at Brougham in Cumbria will force a
reappraisal of their role in 3rd-century society.

The women are thought to have come from the Danube region of Eastern
Europe, which was where the Ancient Greeks said the fearsome Amazon
warriors could be found.

The women, believed to have died some time between AD220 and 300,
were burnt on pyres upon which were placed their horses and military
equipment. The remains were uncovered in the 1960s but full-scale
analysis and identification has been possible only since 2000 with
technological advances.

The soldiers are believed to have been part of the numerii, a Roman
irregular unit, which would have been attached to a legion serving in
Britain. Other finds show that their unit originated from the
Danubian provinces of Noricum, Pannonia and Ilyria which now form
parts of Austria, Hungary and the former Yugoslavia.

Hilary Cool, the director of Barbican Research Associates, which
specialises in post- excavation archaeological analysis, said that
the remains were the most intriguing aspects of a site that is
changing our understanding of Roman burial rites.

"It seems highly probable that we have a unit raised in the Danubian
lands and transferred to Britain," she says in British Archaeology.

"Though the numerii are generally referred to as irregular units,
they are not thought of as having women among their ranks. However,
the unit came from the area where the Ancient Greeks placed the
origin of women warriors called Amazons. Could the numerii be even
more irregular than anyone has ever dreamt?"

The cemetery at Brougham served a fort and the civilian settlement of
Brocavum in the 3rd century and analysis of the remains of more than
180 people showed that everybody's ashes were buried there.
Archaeologists have been able to determine the ages and gender of the
dead and to build up a detailed picture of Roman funerals in
Brougham.

One of the sets of women warrior's remains were found with the burnt
remnants of animals. Bone veneer, used to decorate boxes, was also
found alongside evidence of a sword scabbard and red pottery. The
possessions suggest that she was of high status and her age has been
estimated at between 20 and 40 years old. The other woman, thought to
be between 21 and 45, was buried with a silver bowl, a sword
scabbard, bone veneer and ivory.

Copyright 2004 Times Newspapers Ltd.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1411715,00.html

----------------------------------------------------------------
The Mysteries of Mithras:
The Pagan Belief That Shaped the Christian World.
http://www.innertraditions.com/isbn/1-59477-027-1
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33695 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2005-02-13
Subject: Edictum Censoris CFQ XXX about complementary appointments of three
Ex Officio Censoris Senioris Caesonis Fabii Quintiliani

Edictum Censoris CFQ XXX about complementary appointments of three
Scribae Censoris CFQ to Cohors Censoris CFQ and a transference of a
Scribae Censoris CFQ within Cohors Censoris CFQ and the honorable
release of a Scriba Censoris CFQ

After discussions with the leadership of Provincia Italia and
Provincia Hispania I have decided to appoint one Scriba Censoris CFQ
from Provincia Hispania and transfer one Scriba Censoris CFQ from for
Provincia Italia. This appointment and transference can be seen as a
test of a higher language specialization within the Cohors. Futher a
Scriba Censoris CFQ will be appointed to manage welcome packets to
new citizens where there Governor prefer such support. Further one
Scriba Censoris within the Officina Approbatio will be honorably
released from her duties and another Scribae Censoris CFQ appointed
in her place.

I. I hereby appoint Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia as a Scriba Censoris
CFQ in the "Officina Ductus" (The Leading Office) to manage welcome
packets to new citizens in Provinciae where there Governor prefer
such support.

II. I. I hereby appoint Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis as a
Scriba Censoris CFQ in "Officina Approbatio" (Office of Approvals) to
do general approval work.

III. I will hereby appoint Marcus Adrianus Complutensis as a Scriba
Censoris CFQ in Officina Approbatio (Office of Approvals), to be
specialized in handling Spanish applicants.

IV. Scriba Censoris CFQ Manius Constantinus Serapio will be
transfered from the "Officina Ductus" (The Leading Office) to
"Officina Approbatio" (Office of Approvals), to be specialized in
handling Italian applicants. He is still expected to continue his
work as a Latin advisor in the Cohors Censoris CFQ.

V. Due to personal reasons Gaia Flavia Aureliana has been forced to
ask to be released from her duties as Scriba Censoris CFQ in
Officina Approbatio (Office of Approvals). Which she hereby is
granted with full honors!

VI. This Edictum becomes effective immediately.

Given the 13th of February, in the year of the Consulship of
Franciscus Apulus Caesar and Gaius Popillius Laenas, 2758 AUC.
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of Roman Times Quartely
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33696 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-02-13
Subject: Re: "Aquila"
---P. Minucia Tiberia Marco Minucio Tiberio Populesque S.P.D.

Kudos!


Might I say that this, in my opinion, is an excellent production.
My compliments to you, Marce Minuci Tiberi, all contributing writers
and to the technical staff who assisted with its graphic
composition. Excellent articles, and a very attractive layout.

I am not sure why the link you gave us is not lighting up, but when
I retype it, I get where I want to be.

I encourage everyone to have a gander through this month's Aquila,
and I look forward to future productions of Aquilia !

Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Marcus Audens" <MarcusAudens@w...>
wrote:
> Citizens of Nova Roma;
>
> I come before you to announce the January Issue of "Aquila." My
apologies for the lateness of this issue, but a combination of
events have worked against us. I must give proper due to the
Honored Senior Consul and his excellent staff for thier efforts in
publishing this newsletter. They have created a new website
for "Aquila", and have come up with some new ideas for the
newsletter as well.
>
> I than them most effusively for thier work in this area. We have
n the "Aquila" staff a new Religious Editor, ProConsul and Pontiff
Astur, who has stepped forward to fill the vacancy left by the
resignation of his predesessor. My thanks for Senator Astur's
willingness to fill this difficult position.
>
> The website for the 2005 "Aquila" is
>
> www.novaroma.org/aquila?
>
> Please enjoy this newsletter, and I will be pleased to recieve all
comments regarding "Aquila."
>
> Very Respectfully;
> Your Literary Servant;
>
> Marcus Minucius-Tiberius Audens -- Editor Commentarium --
"Aquila" -- Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33697 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-02-13
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
You know not what youve wrought! LOL. Batten down the
hatches, Quirites, here we go again!
--- nabarz@...
<nabarz@...> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> This piece from The Times newspaper might be of
interest to some.
>
> Regards,
> N.
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
> Women Warriors From Amazon
> Fought For Britains Roman Army
> By Lewis Smith
> The Times - UK
> 22.12.2004
>
> The remains of two Amazon warriors serving with the
Roman army in
> Britain have been discovered in a cemetery that has
astonished
> archaeologists. Women soldiers were previously
unknown in the Roman
> army in Britain and the find at Brougham in Cumbria
will force a
> reappraisal of their role in 3rd-century society.
>
> The women are thought to have come from the Danube
region of Eastern
> Europe, which was where the Ancient Greeks said the
fearsome Amazon
> warriors could be found.
>
> The women, believed to have died some time between
AD220 and 300,
> were burnt on pyres upon which were placed their
horses and military
> equipment. The remains were uncovered in the 1960s
but full-scale
> analysis and identification has been possible only
since 2000 with
> technological advances.
>
> The soldiers are believed to have been part of the
numerii, a Roman
> irregular unit, which would have been attached to a
legion serving in
> Britain. Other finds show that their unit originated
from the
> Danubian provinces of Noricum, Pannonia and Ilyria
which now form
> parts of Austria, Hungary and the former Yugoslavia.

>
> Hilary Cool, the director of Barbican Research
Associates, which
> specialises in post- excavation archaeological
analysis, said that
> the remains were the most intriguing aspects of a
site that is
> changing our understanding of Roman burial rites.
>
> "It seems highly probable that we have a unit raised
in the Danubian
> lands and transferred to Britain," she says in
British Archaeology.
>
> "Though the numerii are generally referred to as
irregular units,
> they are not thought of as having women among their
ranks. However,
> the unit came from the area where the Ancient Greeks
placed the
> origin of women warriors called Amazons. Could the
numerii be even
> more irregular than anyone has ever dreamt?"
>
> The cemetery at Brougham served a fort and the
civilian settlement of
> Brocavum in the 3rd century and analysis of the
remains of more than
> 180 people showed that everybody's ashes were buried
there.
> Archaeologists have been able to determine the ages
and gender of the
> dead and to build up a detailed picture of Roman
funerals in
> Brougham.
>
> One of the sets of women warrior's remains were
found with the burnt
> remnants of animals. Bone veneer, used to decorate
boxes, was also
> found alongside evidence of a sword scabbard and red
pottery. The
> possessions suggest that she was of high status and
her age has been
> estimated at between 20 and 40 years old. The other
woman, thought to
> be between 21 and 45, was buried with a silver bowl,
a sword
> scabbard, bone veneer and ivory.
>
> Copyright 2004 Times Newspapers Ltd.
>
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1411715,00.html

>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
> The Mysteries of Mithras:
> The Pagan Belief That Shaped the Christian World.
> http://www.innertraditions.com/isbn/1-59477-027-1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
=== Message Truncated ===


=====
S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33698 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2005-02-13
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
OH NO!!!! Not this thread again. I never thought the other one would
end.


Quintus Servilius Fidenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33699 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-13
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
Salvete;
poor Nabarz, he's probably the only Mithras follower in Britannia.
I hope Scaurus hasn't read this or he'll burst an artery...;-)
M. Hortensia Maior

> OH NO!!!! Not this thread again. I never thought the other one
would
> end.
>
>
> Quintus Servilius Fidenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33701 From: Vestinia, called Vesta Date: 2005-02-13
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
*rolls eyes*

Indeed!
--- Charlie Collins <qservilius@...> wrote:

> OH NO!!!! Not this thread again. I never thought the other one
> would
> end.
>
>
> Quintus Servilius Fidenas
>
>


=====
Optia Vestinia Aurelia, called Vesta
Defensatrix Beldenia, Sgt. of Adiantum
Squire to Sir Ambrose Mavrorothakis
Jacobite, Smithereen, Rickmaniac and Donut
SCAdian, Filker, Bujold junkie and part-time pusher
Speaking only for myself and my evil twin Skippy.



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33702 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-02-13
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
In a message dated 2/13/05 3:20:00 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
rory12001@... writes:

poor Nabarz, he's probably the only Mithras follower in Britannia.



I think there are more then just him. I coresponded with several 4 years
ago.

Q. Fabius Maximus




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33704 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: St. Valentine and The Lupercalia
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

I thought it might not be offensive to link the Roman calendar with
popular contemporary festivities in some instances; as Valentine's Day
is celebrated pretty much around the world as a saecular holiday, I
offer this post.

The history of Valentine's Day --- and its patron saint --- is
shrouded in mystery. But we do know that February has long been a
month of romance. St. Valentine's Day, as we know it today, contains
vestiges of both Christian and ancient Roman tradition. As we'll see
(though I don't want to spoil the surprise too much) tomorrow is the
celebration of the Lupercalia, a wild and sexually-charged feria from
which the Western Christian Church took the idea of romantic
intercourse and combined it with the date of the martyrdom of
Valentine in Rome to create a less ... vivid ... celebration.

One legend contends that Valentine was a priest who served during the
third century in Rome. When Emperor Claudius II decided that single
men made better soldiers than those with wives and families, he
outlawed marriage for young men -- his crop of potential soldiers.
Valentine, realizing the cruelty of the decree, defied Claudius and
continued to perform marriages for young lovers in secret. When
Valentine's actions were discovered, Claudius ordered that he be put
to death. He was beaten with clubs, beheaded, and buried on the
Flaminian Way on 14 February c. A.D. 270; his relics were later
translated to the Church of Saint Praxedes.

According to one legend, Valentine actually sent the first "valentine"
greeting himself. While in prison, it is believed that Valentine fell
in love with a young girl -- who may have been his jailor's daughter
-- who visited him during his confinement. Before his death, it is
alleged that he wrote her a letter, which he signed 'From your
Valentine,' an expression that is still in use today. By the Middle
Ages, Valentine was one of the most popular saints in England and
France. He is the patron saint of affianced couples, against
fainting, bee keepers, engaged couples, epilepsy, greeting card
manufacturers (no joke), happy marriages, lovers, plague, travellers,
and young people.

Interestingly, the Eastern Church does not celebrate the feast of St.
Valentine; today the Orthodox remember St. Cyril, Apostle to the Slavs
--- he and his brother St. Methodius invented the alphabet used by
many Slavic countries to this day, including Russia, which is called
(drumroll please) the "cyrillic" alphabet.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33705 From: Maxima Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
Charlie Collins <qservilius@...> wrote:

OH NO!!!! Not this thread again. I never thought the other one would end.


Quintus Servilius Fidenas

Salve Quintus Servilius Fidenas

Even I, the original instigator of that first thread, have to join you in your plea. Please, let's not go through all that again! This is a subject that was laid to rest and should remain so. Let's sleeping dogs lie!

Vale

Maxima Valeria Messallina


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33706 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
Salvete omnes,

Please keep in mind that we have new people coming or returning to
the main list every month. This particular name that posted the
article looks new to me so more than likely he or she missed that
conversation that dragged on before. It is not a good way to keep and
greet new people by expressing dismay about their posting. Want them
to shrug in frustration and leave?

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33707 From: Stefn Ullarsson Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: A Name Change and Profer of Tutelage
Valetudo quod fortuna,

Be it known that Gaius Metellus Caladus has manumitted Drusilla Metella
Germanica from his Potestas. This change was amenable to all parties and has
been approved by the Censors.

I thank him for his care and agreeableness in this matter.

I, Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus, have agreed to take Germanica under
my Tutelage.

Be it known that Drusilla Ulleria Germanica now walks amongst us.

May That Which Is Holy continue to Smile upon us all.

=========================================
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias, Tutor et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poet

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

--
Mind's reach should have, no bounds in search
For meaning and wit, riddles to solve
To seek and think, are greatest skills
In mankind's grasp, oftimes unused
- The Sayings of Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33708 From: Nabarz Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: Women in Britain's Roman Army
Salve,

sorry guys I didn't realise that newspaper article was already
postedÂ… obviously I need to check the list more often.

Btw I am not the only one, there are several other Mithras followers
in Britain :-)
Naturaly there are alot more in Italy, one group in Tuscany even
have their own new Mithraeum.

Regards,
Nabarz

----------------------------------------------------------------
The Mysteries of Mithras:
The Pagan Belief That Shaped the Christian World. By P.Nabarz
http://www.innertraditions.com/isbn/1-59477-027-1
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33709 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: Women in Britain's Roman Army
Salve Nabarz;
my apologies;-. I'm glad you're here do tell, their own Mithraeum,
are the rites preserved enough so you can do the ritual?
fascinating,
Vajravand (hmm is that right?), Marca Hortensia
>


Btw I am not the only one, there are several other Mithras followers
> in Britain :-)
> Naturaly there are alot more in Italy, one group in Tuscany even
> have their own new Mithraeum.
>
> Regards,
> Nabarz
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33710 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: St. Valentine and The Lupercalia
Saluete omnes!
This is a Valentine I understand although it appears there were at least another
three within the more structured church able to confuse and mask his threat to
them.

Assorted newspaper articles appear preceding today giving a short history of the
tracditional St. Valentine and his association with romance. His bones are
supposed to have been brought back to the Carmelite convent in Angiers St. If
the real Valentine's bones were brought back, then it throws an entirely unknown
light Irish Christian history. Almost certainly they were not because Saint
Valentine is a Church construct to hide the real Valentine away. He nearly
became Pope of Rome when the west still allowed other metropolitan bishops the
title and far from being a Saint in their eyes, he was the greatest figure in a
resurgent deep spiritual movement the Western churches have repeatedly killed
off, since the Dark Ages, literally. It has been rising again but this time
often giving up on calling itself Christian.

A full biography can be found under .../Valentinus - A Gnostic for All
Seasons.htm . Because all Gnostics, like most early Christians, were both
initiatory and secretive, we know more slander than actual detail. They had to
be secretive with Christians in general disliked and technically illegal, with
their less mystical rivals who made themselves the official churches even more
antagonistic, for one reason because Gnostics were not as hostile to the
prevailing religions. If anything, they were their equivalent using Christian
terminology.

Valentinus was born in North Africa around 100. He moved to education in
Alexandria and thence became prominant in Rome between 130 and 165. Tertullian
says he became a heretic in 175 but he could not be viewed as such in his
lifetime since no orthodoxy had been decided yet. His own claimed tradition ran
from Paul through Theodas (of whom we know zilch) and after him to Basilides,
who seems to have consolidated and formalised the teaching.

Gnostics teach a system of psychological self-knowledge believed to become
cosmic knowledge. Any faith is faith that the system works. Jesus occupies a
position something like the Buddha and Haile Selassie for intelligint
Rastafarians, the Representative Perfected Man who is God because Genesis states
"God[s] created Man in Their own Image, Male and Female created They Them", with
much elaborate gender disagreement impossible in a language without formal
grammatic gender.

There is certainly Origina Sin but it is God's (or rather the creator's) not
ours. If God by definition represents Perfection, anything not consciously God
is necessarily imperfect, that is, by comparison, 'sinful', which in the Greek
early Christians used means literally something like 'off-target'. The 'Fall' is
'Creation'. Jesus is the Redeemer, not by buying a wrathful deity off for us,
but as shower of the Way (like many religions, early Christians called
themselves 'The Way'), the Christ is the perfected human being which is God that
Jesus represents, and teaches us to be, not to worship knowing we never can
become. This is what really upset the more ritualised churches. Not that they
were too happy on distinguishing the Ultimate Unknowable God (the one Athenians
did not believe St. Paul about) from the creator, usually 'Jehovah', at best mad
at worst bad.

Valentinus appears to have been modern in realising that "God created man and
man created God. So is it in the world. Men make gods and they worship their
creations. If would be fitting for the gods to worship men". (Gospel of Philip,
Logion 85: 1-4). When speaking of gods, they seem to have been far more aware
than the liturgical churches that they were refering to mental projections and
personifications. The style of the day was myth. An outer circle would draw
conclusions from the story, many perhaps believing it a literal account of how
things came to be, initiates would understand it is as symbolic as a page of
equations we understand to describe, not to be, the 'real thing'. The liturgical
churches took things literally and have been laughing themselves silly at the
complexity of Gnostic myth ever since, much in the manner of a school bully
challenging the swot to tell him how solid his fist really isn't.

Valentinus would have liked our quantum science. It confirms what he realised
philosophically, that Imperfect Things are formed from Perfect No-thing, and
understanding the flaws in formation helps to bring it into line with a more
perfect expression. It can never be perfect of course, since it contrasts with
Perfection. Scientists say the observer is part of the experiment, Valentinus
takes that much further, that Understanding liberates from matter and liberates
matter. God is 'in' Existence only in the way water is 'in' ice, not like some
hidden virus. At the same time, God is beyond Existence, quite possibly
incapable of existential awareness except through living minds.

How Valentinus got himself linked to love is threefold. First, Gnostics either
hate the world or love its tragic unawareness of what it really is. Second,
Valentinians were not averse to pagan ceremonies and the archaic Roman
Lupercalia fertility rite took place on the 14th. This involved selected young
men performing secretive rites before running through the streets dressed in
fresh-flayed wolfskin whipping young women with the blood-dripping tail. Like
various less bloody rituals still enacted in Cornwall, any woman caught hoped
(or feared) to get pregnant. Since the day ended in a feast, it was extremely
popular with the less ascetic and the church tried to tone it down somewhat.

Third, Valentinians recognised seven sacrements of Baptism, Anointing,
Eucharist, Initiation of Priest/esses, Rite for the Dying, Redemption
(Apolytrosis) and Bridal Chamber. This was prominent among Valentinians and
there is every chance that others took it literally (or their enemies said so).
Some Gnostics took the evil creator Jehovah myth very literally to defy all
recognised 'standards of decency' as rules for the material world to be flouted
in worship of the Beyond. Some versions may well have used ritual sex equivalent
to the Great Rite in 3rd-level Wicca (even if that is a reconstruction).

The Bridal Chamber unifies what Jung later called the Female Animus and Male
Anima with the material Persona. There are also elements of reconciliation to
Sophia (Wisdom). Where Christ is the Logos, or Thought of God, Sophia is divine
Wisdom. Usually, she falls from Heaven through being too curious about
'Creation' and has a pretty bad time of it before recovering knowledge of
herself. (I think there is a version where her fall creates existence). Of
course as well as wisdom, very obviously prostituted to evil human ends, She is
also Us.

The Gospel of Philip again gives the basis: "When you make the two one, and when
you make the inner as the outer and the outer as the inner and the above as the
below, and when you make the male and the female into a single one, so that the
male will not be male and the female not be female . . . then shall you enter
the kingdom". (Logion 22) Anybody who knows what that's all about probably
doesn't need it! Yet it can be seen as very modern, very simple
self-integration. A more literal expression of androgynous equality of course
underlies 1960s liberalism, the reason it terrified Conservatism into extreme
reaction like nothing else has. It revived many other Gnostic outlooks, though
not Christian. The Tao Te Ching was more familiar than the Nag Hammadi hoard.

The Gnostic principle is often called Dualistic. The Dualism is as much a
necessary distinction as matter particles in a system defining matter as energy.
Gnosticism is non-dualistic; it is what made itself orthodoxy that is dualist,
distinguishing literal Creator and Creation.

Thus the real Valentinus. A real saint in terms of his sublime teaching no
doubt, but not one for the later established Churches. Like so many things, it
is very simple and obvious, yet extremely complex to formulate into words. Had
he become 'Pope' he might perhaps have established a tolerant mystical
Christianity more like the way Buddhism developed. But by nature, Gnosticism is
élitist, individualistic and multiple. Such a system finds it hard to compete
with a formalised structure of simple faith.

A prayer and part of a blessing from the Great One Himself (Aeon is what St.Paul
called 'powers and principalities', orders of existence personified):

I am established, I am redeemed and I redeem my soul from this aeon and from all
that comes from it, in the name of IAO, who redeemed his soul unto the
redemption in Christ, the living one. (Quoted by Irenaeus).

May the Grace beyond time and space that was before the beginnings of the
Universe fill our inner man and increase within us the semblance of itself as
the grain of mustard seed.

Caesariensis

>
> I thought it might not be offensive to link the Roman calendar with
> popular contemporary festivities in some instances; as Valentine's Day
> is celebrated pretty much around the world as a saecular holiday, I
> offer this post.
>
> The history of Valentine's Day --- and its patron saint --- is
> shrouded in mystery. But we do know that February has long been a
> month of romance. St. Valentine's Day, as we know it today, contains
> vestiges of both Christian and ancient Roman tradition.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33711 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: St. Valentine and The Lupercalia
G. Equitius Cato Caesariensis quiritibusque S.P.D.

Zoinks! Well, without getting into too much discussion about You Know
Who, Caesariensis' post makes it pretty clear why Gnosticism is
considered a heresy by both Eastern and Western Churches :-)

One very significant difference I would point out between East and
West is the idea of Original Sin and the purpose of You Know Who's
work on earth:

In the West, God is seen as a sort of bookkeeper (the only root word
in the English language, by the way, with three sets of double letters
in a row --- the only other one being its dependant "bookkeeping"),
whose great ledger has on one side the accountability of Man and on
the other, to "balance" it, the grace of redemption through You Know
Who. Man is born into a corrupted state of essential sinfulness that
can only be submitted to God's justice by the sacrifice of You Know
Who. The emphasis on a legalistic approach to sin and the suffering
of You Know Who and its ramifications led to practices like
indulgences.

In the East, Man is born "good" by virtue of his creation by God, and
remains essentially "good" because Mankind does not have the power to
corrupt what God has declared good, but through Original Sin has
become unable to correctly worship God and has so been cut off from
eternal life. The work of You Know Who served to allow Mankind to
once again correctly worship (hence "orthodox" or "right/correct
praise") God and regain everlasting life through His Resurrection, and
as a by-product fulfilled the requirements for the atonement for sin
and re-opened the path of deification to Mankind. The emphasis
is placed on the glorification of You Know Who through His death and
Resurrection, and thereby the glorification of Mankind, our "theosis".

Consider the contrast between depictions of the Him on the Cross: in
the West, we have dolorous hymns like the "Stabat Mater"; in the East,
He is seen as the "King of Creation reigning from the Tree" and the
Trisagion.

While the emperor Claudius II was no great friend to the Christian
Church, the Valentine most often understood to be the foundation for
today's celebration was not punished for being a Christian per se, but
rather because he directly disobeyed a decree of the emperor. The
Romans were more concerned about public order and obedience than about
theological niceties; except for the Three Great Persecutions,
Christians were basically left to their own unless they created a
public disturbance or openly flaunted the breaking of the law, as in
St. Valentine's case.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33712 From: C. Albius Gadelicus Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Familiae Novae Romae
C. Albius Gadelicus Quiritibus Novae Romae S P D -

Salvete, all!

I just rejoined NR after being absent for quite some time. It's
interesting to see all the changes!

One that has me personally a bit confused, though, is NR's family
structure. I've been reading through the laws and it's helped, but my
grasp is still a little fuzzy. I'm sure this has all been gone
through *ad nauseam*, but I can't find it so I hope the good Censores
or someone else will be able to enlighten me.

As I understand it, there are no longer 'patres/matres familiarum' at
the level of the gens, only the family level. Nonne?

Is there then any control of nomina gentilia? That is, could just
anyone become a citizen with the nomen, say, Albius/Albia, and would
I therefore have to recognize him/her as gentilis meus/mea?

Is a prospective citizen still required to write to the founder (I
would say, 'pater/mater familias,' but that word now applies to heads
of *familiae* not *gentes*, correct?) asking for permission to take
the nomen?

As I say, forgive me if this has all been said before...

Valete bene,
C. Albius Gadelicus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33713 From: F & R Parkyn Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
Salve,

As someone new to Nova Roma and who missed the original discussion
regarding this, I would be interested to read a brief summary of any
conclusions arrived at by Nova Roma regarding this matter.

Vale!



>Charlie Collins <qservilius@...> wrote:
>
>OH NO!!!! Not this thread again. I never thought the other one would end.
>
>
>Quintus Servilius Fidenas
>
>Salve Quintus Servilius Fidenas
>
>Even I, the original instigator of that first thread, have to join you in
>your plea. Please, let's not go through all that again! This is a subject
>that was laid to rest and should remain so. Let's sleeping dogs lie!
>
>Vale
>
>Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33714 From: Clovius Ullerius Ursus Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: A Name Change and Profer of Tutelage
Welcome to the newest member of the gens. I look forward to getting to know
you and will support you in what way I can

Clovius Ullerius Ursus

_____

From: Stefn Ullarsson [mailto:catamount_grange@...]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 12:57 PM
To: Forum Majorum
Subject: [Nova-Roma] A Name Change and Profer of Tutelage


Valetudo quod fortuna,

Be it known that Gaius Metellus Caladus has manumitted Drusilla Metella
Germanica from his Potestas. This change was amenable to all parties and
has
been approved by the Censors.

I thank him for his care and agreeableness in this matter.

I, Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus, have agreed to take Germanica
under
my Tutelage.

Be it known that Drusilla Ulleria Germanica now walks amongst us.

May That Which Is Holy continue to Smile upon us all.

=========================================
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias, Tutor et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poet

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

--
Mind's reach should have, no bounds in search
For meaning and wit, riddles to solve
To seek and think, are greatest skills
In mankind's grasp, oftimes unused
- The Sayings of Venator



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT



<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=129u7sdh3/M=298184.6018725.7038619.3001176/D=gr
oups/S=1705313712:HM/EXP=1108490227/A=2532114/R=2/SIG=12kfceaao/*http://clk.
atdmt.com/NFX/go/yhxxxnfx0020000014nfx/direct/01/&time=1108403827015547>

<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=298184.6018725.7038619.3001176/D=groups/S=
:HM/A=2532114/rand=378800519>

_____

Yahoo! Groups Links


* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/


* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>


* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33715 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
Ave;
here it is pro and con.

Con: women wove
Pro: they did not

vale
Marca Hortensia Maior, the original culprit;-

> Salve,
>
> As someone new to Nova Roma and who missed the original discussion
> regarding this, I would be interested to read a brief summary of any
> conclusions arrived at by Nova Roma regarding this matter.
>
> Vale!
>
>
>
>
>> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33716 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-14
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
Salvete Quirites,

F & R Parkyn wrote:

> As someone new to Nova Roma and who missed the original discussion
> regarding this, I would be interested to read a brief summary of any
> conclusions arrived at by Nova Roma regarding this matter.

The concensus, such as it was, seems to have been that while it's
entirely possible for women of the period to have been employed as
warriors or guards in some private capacity, it's not plausible to claim
these women were actual soldiers in a Roman legion. They may have been
guards, they may have been private warriors employed in some other
capacity, they may have been prostitutes who were given gifts of armor,
they may have been something else. In order for evidence to rise to the
level of proof that a woman was actually a member of a legion it would
require something like a diploma (military discharge) with the woman's
name on it.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33718 From: Nabarz Date: 2005-02-15
Subject: Re: Women in Britain's Roman Army
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> Salve Nabarz;
> my apologies;-. I'm glad you're here do tell, their own Mithraeum,
> are the rites preserved enough so you can do the ritual?
> fascinating,
> Vajravand (hmm is that right?), Marca Hortensia
> >
>
Salve & Nama

There is the Mithras Liurgy rite, from around 300AD-400AD, which is a
complete ceremony. However, there are some debates about if its a
typical rite or one that combined with Egyptian material by the
person who wrote it. This is used extensively in neo-mithraism.

There are also number of inscriptions eg Santa Prisca which help.
Overall there is little material to use, hence people have been
experimenting with different ritual formats, ideas and material :)

I am interested in the revival of the Mithraic Mysteries, and I have
put togther seven mithras initiatory rites/meditations in my book for
the seven grade in Mithraism:
http://www.innertraditions.com/isbn/1-59477-027-1

There have mithraic based groups/people since 1910s, well at least
thats when first Mithraic revivalist books were published.

btw The Italian Mithraic group I mention have website in Italian at
www.mithra.it

Regards,
Nabarz




> Btw I am not the only one, there are several other Mithras
followers
> > in Britain :-)
> > Naturaly there are alot more in Italy, one group in Tuscany even
> > have their own new Mithraeum.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nabarz
> >
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33719 From: Stefn Ullarsson Date: 2005-02-15
Subject: [Fwd: Yahoo! News - Ruins Support Myth of Rome's Founding]
Valeatudo quod fortuna omnes,

Thought this might prove of some little interest.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050215/ap_on_sc/rome_s_origins&e=2


=======================================================
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poet

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

--
"In Romae viae omniae terminant"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33720 From: C. Albius Gadelicus Date: 2005-02-15
Subject: Re: Cerealia offered by the Flamen Cerealis on behalf of SPQNR
C. Albius Gadelicus bonae Flauiae Tulliae Ualeriae Scholasticae
Quiritibusque Nouae Romae S P D

Auete!

I'm just returning to NR, and am slowly wading through the gazillion
posts on the list... :-) I had a couple of questions about this
ritual and the corrections.

I guess I should start by saying that this isn't directed at the
Cerealia ritual *per se*, just for my knowledge in adapting it for
other rituals. Anyway...

FTVS:
> 'Tus' is a
> neuter noun, so the accusative, here required, is also 'tus,'
not '*turum,' which, as the
> asterisk indicates, doesn't exist--at least not as an accusative
singular.

Salve bona Flauia Tullia -

My dictionary (Bantam New College Latin & English) has 'tus
turis' 'incense; frankincense' and gives the gender as masculine.

FTVS:
> A more common way of saying 'be honored,' particularly in a
religious context, is to
> say 'macte' + ablative, as Pontifex Scaurus has done many times--
'macte vino inferio esto'
> 'be honored with this humble wine.' The ablative of the
participle 'libante' is more normally
> 'libanti,' when used as an adjective as it is here, but may be in '-
e' as well. This is,
> however, a construction of the personal agent, so the
preposition 'a/ab' is required: 'a
> me vinum libanti,' though I have a feeling that the gerundive might
be a better way of
> expressing this 'a me vino libando.'

How about "macte hoc vino esto a me libato," would that work? It
seems simple, and I'm a fan of simple. :-)

Also, could someone who knows compare and contrast the meanings
of "afferre" and "offerre"? I tend to use "offerre" but maybe it's
not the most appropriate word.

I do appreciate the help - I think if I'm going to make offerings in
Latin, the least I can do is make sure my Latin is as good as I can
make it...

Tibi vobisque gratias ago.

Valete bene omnes,
C. Albius Gadelicus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33722 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-02-15
Subject: Re: Cerealia offered by the Flamen Cerealis on behalf of SPQNR
> My dictionary (Bantam New College Latin & English) has 'tus
> turis' 'incense; frankincense' and gives the gender as masculine.

As a matter of fact, either is right, perhaps. Dr. Traupman has masculine; the folks at Oxford, neuter. Cato (De Agr., 134) seems to agree with Dr. Traupman by using what could essentially be either masculine or feminine, though not neuter. Cato doesn't make things easy, as this is the only place where he uses the word. Unfortunately, I don't see anything in the Teubnerian copy of the text, nor in the commentary, to shed any light on the matter. Given the ritual nature of things, though, it might be better to go with what is written in Cato, and use 'ture'.

[...]

> Also, could someone who knows compare and contrast the meanings
> of "afferre" and "offerre"? I tend to use "offerre" but maybe it's
> not the most appropriate word.

Here's how William Whitaker's program parses the two words:

adferr.e V PRES ACTIVE INF 0 X
adferr.e V PRES PASSIVE IND 2 S Early uncommon
adferr.e V PRES PASSIVE IMP 2 S
adfero, adferre, adtuli, adlatus V TRANS [XXXAO]
bring to, carry, convey; report, bring word, allege, announce; produce, cause;

offerr.e V PRES ACTIVE INF 0 X
offerr.e V PRES PASSIVE IND 2 S Early uncommon
offerr.e V PRES PASSIVE IMP 2 S
offero, offerre, obtuli, oblatus V [XXXAX]
offer; present; cause; bestow;

Not sure how much help this is. If anything needs clarification, just drop me a line and I'll be glad to oblige.

Vale,

Quintus Caecilius Metellus
Fetial
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33723 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-02-15
Subject: Re: Cerealia offered by the Flamen Cerealis on behalf of SPQNR
Flavia Tullia Scholastica Caio Albio Gadelico quiritibus, sociis,
peregrinisque omnibus S.P.D.

In part because I have been asked in private not to discuss corrections
to the Latin of religious rituals in public, I'm going to answer portions of
this offlist, and will deal here only with matters which appear to be of
more general interest. I invite anyone who shares C. Albucius Gadelicus'
interest in correct Latin for ritual or other purposes to join the Sodalitas
Latinitatis (Latinitas, as Yahoo calls it), where it is perhaps more
appropriate to discuss matters of Latin. All of us should be aiming at
improving our Latin, and that in Nova Roma as a whole, but until such time
as we all are at least somewhat conversant with the niceties of Latin
grammar, I would prefer to avoid boring the (still) Latinless with
discussions on this topic--not that we shouldn't discuss Latin here.

> C. Albius Gadelicus bonae Flauiae Tulliae Ualeriae Scholasticae
> Quiritibusque Nouae Romae S P D
>
> Auete!
>
> I'm just returning to NR, and am slowly wading through the gazillion
> posts on the list... :-) I had a couple of questions about this
> ritual and the corrections.
>
Fortunately, the list has been fairly quiet the last few days. . .

> I guess I should start by saying that this isn't directed at the
> Cerealia ritual *per se*, just for my knowledge in adapting it for
> other rituals. Anyway...
>
> FTVS:
>> 'Tus' is a
>> neuter noun, so the accusative, here required, is also 'tus,'
> not '*turum,' which, as the
>> asterisk indicates, doesn't exist--at least not as an accusative
> singular.
>
> Salve bona Flauia Tullia -
>
> My dictionary (Bantam New College Latin & English) has 'tus
> turis' 'incense; frankincense' and gives the gender as masculine.
>
It is indeed 'tus, turis,' 'frankincense,' 'incense,' but the Oxford
Latin Dictionary (the best unabridged Latin dictionary in English) gives the
gender as neuter. The other (older, less extensive) unabridged
Latin-English dictionary, Lewis and Short, also give the gender as neuter,
as does Cassells' intermediate dictionary, though the Amsco New College
Latin Dictionary gives the gender as masculine. Perhaps both the Amsco, and
your dictionary as well, have typos--I would certainly be inclined to go
with the gender listed in the two most authoritative dictionaries, and that
in an old standby in the intermediate range. Even my Collins Gem dictionary
gives the gender as neuter--and that little one is approved by one of our
senior Latinists, Avitus.

There is also a variant spelling 'thus,' derived from the Greek,
'thyos.'

> FTVS:
>> A more common way of saying 'be honored,' particularly in a
> religious context, is to
>> say 'macte' + ablative, as Pontifex Scaurus has done many times--
> 'macte vino inferio esto'
>> 'be honored with this humble wine.' The ablative of the
> participle 'libante' is more normally
>> 'libanti,' when used as an adjective as it is here, but may be in '-
> e' as well. This is,
>> however, a construction of the personal agent, so the
> preposition 'a/ab' is required: 'a
>> me vinum libanti,' though I have a feeling that the gerundive might
> be a better way of
>> expressing this 'a me vino libando.'
>
> How about "macte hoc vino esto a me libato," would that work? It
> seems simple, and I'm a fan of simple. :-)
>
I'm going to deal with this section offlist.

> Also, could someone who knows compare and contrast the meanings
> of "afferre" and "offerre"? I tend to use "offerre" but maybe it's
> not the most appropriate word.
>
I'll discuss this at greater length offlist, but basically,
'afferre/adferre' means 'to bring to' and 'offerre' means 'to cause to be
encountered,' 'to put in the path of.' There are numerous other meanings,
but a quick check of 'offerre' doesn't seem to indicate much that would
apply to making sacrifices. The closest is 'to provide, supply' and 'to
hand over, deliver, surrender.'

> I do appreciate the help - I think if I'm going to make offerings in
> Latin, the least I can do is make sure my Latin is as good as I can
> make it...
>
This is a most laudable goal--and part of the reason why I corrected the
Latin of this ritual in public.

> Tibi vobisque gratias ago.

Flocci est.

> Valete bene omnes,
> C. Albius Gadelicus
>
Vale, et valete,

Flavia Tullia Scholastica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33724 From: Kyrene Ariadne Date: 2005-02-15
Subject: Name change
Salvete omnes,


Joining the list of people whose names have changed recently, I am now
Cyrene Gladia Corva Apollinaris. Thanks to the censores for their
assistance!



Bene valete,
Cyrene



--
AIM: Kyrene Ariadne Yahoo!: kyreneariadne
* Hellenion: http://www.hellenion.org
* Temenos Theon: http://kyrene.4t.com
* Demos Oreiadon: http://demos-oreiadon.8m.net

Beloved Pan, and all ye other gods who haunt this place,
make me beautiful within, and grant that what-ever
happens outside of me will help my soul to grow.
May I always be aware that true wealth lies in wisdom,
and may my "gold" be so abundant that only a wise
man can lift and carry it away. For me that is prayer
enough. - Socrates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33725 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-15
Subject: Re: Cerealia offered by the Flamen Cerealis on behalf of SPQNR
M. Hortensia Maior Fl. Tulliae Valeriae Scholasticae spd;
May I say, I for one am very interested in rituals and the proper
Latin and would like this discussion to continue in public for all
our benefits.I don't know what person has a problem with a Latinist
helping them, but for sure I'd love it.

I really don't think that any of us are religious geniuses who knows
everything, so please let us all learn together. We can only get
wiser and the religio will benefit, and one day we'll all be speaking
Latin on this list!
optime vale
M. Hortensia Maior TRP


In part because I have been asked in private not to discuss
corrections
> to the Latin of religious rituals in public, I'm going to answer
portions of
> this offlist,
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33727 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
A. Apollonius Cordus C. Albio Gadelico omnibusque sal.

While you're waiting for an official answer, here are
some unofficial answers:

> As I understand it, there are no longer
> 'patres/matres familiarum' at
> the level of the gens, only the family level. Nonne?

Correct. A gens now has no leader of any kind.

> Is there then any control of nomina gentilia? That
> is, could just
> anyone become a citizen with the nomen, say,
> Albius/Albia, and would
> I therefore have to recognize him/her as gentilis
> meus/mea?

Yes. Anyone can join any gens, subject to the
agreement of the censores or their delegates. This is
in line with historical practice.

> Is a prospective citizen still required to write to
> the founder (I
> would say, 'pater/mater familias,' but that word now
> applies to heads
> of *familiae* not *gentes*, correct?) asking for
> permission to take
> the nomen?

No, a prospective citizen does not have to write to
the founder of the gens; yes, the words paterfamilias
and materfamilias now refer exclusively to heads of familiae.





___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33728 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Salvete Quirites, et salve Gadelico,

The original message that Cordus is replying to below seems to have gone awry
in my e-mail. I'd have answered it before this had I seen it.

In any case, the answers that Cordus provides below are complete and correct.

Valete,

Gn. Equitius Marinus
Censor, Novae Romae

"A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...> writes:

>
> A. Apollonius Cordus C. Albio Gadelico omnibusque sal.
>
> While you're waiting for an official answer, here are
> some unofficial answers:
>
> > As I understand it, there are no longer
> > 'patres/matres familiarum' at
> > the level of the gens, only the family level. Nonne?
>
> Correct. A gens now has no leader of any kind.
>
> > Is there then any control of nomina gentilia? That
> > is, could just
> > anyone become a citizen with the nomen, say,
> > Albius/Albia, and would
> > I therefore have to recognize him/her as gentilis
> > meus/mea?
>
> Yes. Anyone can join any gens, subject to the
> agreement of the censores or their delegates. This is
> in line with historical practice.
>
> > Is a prospective citizen still required to write to
> > the founder (I
> > would say, 'pater/mater familias,' but that word now
> > applies to heads
> > of *familiae* not *gentes*, correct?) asking for
> > permission to take
> > the nomen?
>
> No, a prospective citizen does not have to write to
> the founder of the gens; yes, the words paterfamilias
> and materfamilias now refer exclusively to heads of familiae.
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!
> http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33729 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Salve

> Salvete Quirites, et salve Gadelico,
>
> The original message that Cordus is replying to below seems to have gone
> awry in my e-mail. I'd have answered it before this had I seen it.
>
> In any case, the answers that Cordus provides below are complete and
> correct.

In such case, I'd ask both the Censores, as a matter of kindness to someone who
actually created a gens, gave it his own real life name and tried (even if
admittedly with not great success so far) to have it developing following a
given idea and philosophy, not to agree to anyone coming from outside Italy
asking to become a Constantinus.

Gens Constantinia is currently made by Italians only and was created with that
exact idea in mind, in order to, in time, become a pole of attraction and
socialization with an active mailing list in italian and, by increasing
tehnumber of active and "stable" citizens, directly and indirectly benefit Nova
Roma as a whole.

Similar ideas were common to other gentes as well. Gens Minia, as far as I know,
is mostly a real life family in France, gens Modia was created to be a pole of
attraction for religio followers, gens Solaria is, as far as I know, mostly
made of people knowing each other in real life, dealing with real life
recostructionism and living in the Italian city of Bologna. And I'm sure there
are other examples. It is true that many Patres and Patres Gentium neglected
their duties, but as a matter of respect for the ones who actually put an
effort in shaping their own gentes, I hope the Censores shall respect their
original ideas and visions rather than allowing just everyone to "join"
indiscriminately and put in place what it will be and would be felt under all
aspects as a legal hjiacking of someone's else ideas, work and efforts.


valete

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33730 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Praetorian Edictum III
L. Arminius Faustus PR quiritibus SPD


Ex Officio Praetoris L. Armini Fausti

I. The praetor L. Arminius Faustus shares its atribution of Moderation of Main List of Nova Roma on his praetorian imperium to the potestas of Quaestor G. Equitius Cato. Therefore G. Equitius Cato is nominated one of the moderatores of Nova Roma Main List, acting on the name and behalf of the praetor.

II. This edictum becomes effective immediately.

III. This nomination is valid for the first semester of 2005.

DATVM·AD·IDIBVS·FEB·ANN·MMDCCLVIII·AVC FR·APULE·CAESARI·C·POPILIO·LAENAE·CONSVLIBVS

16 february 2005

L·ARMINIVS·FAVSTVS

Praetor MMDCCLVIII AVC




---------------------------------
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador do Yahoo! agora.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33731 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
M. Hortensia Maior D.Constantino Fusco spd;

since I live in Hibernia I can firmly tell you that
geographically based family names are clan names. As far as I have
learned in my "Introduction to Nova Roma class" from Consularis
Astur, the Roman gentes were definitely not clans.

So to be true to the ways of Rome it would be utterly ahistorical to
maintain fictitious clans. In fact ex-slaves would take their former
master's name so one would find I daresay Syrian, North African,
Greek, Germani members of gentes.

With provincial lists I do not see any difficulty in contacting
one's geographically close cives.
In Hibernia there is a Hortensia, Porsenna, Gladius, Apollonius, 2
Julii, Calidius and we can all get together!

We are going foward to do something wonderful, restore the political
religous and social structures of Republican Rome.
That's what Nova Roma is all about
bene vale in pace deorum
M. Hortensia Maior TRP
Prorpraetrix Hiberniae
caput Officina Iuriis
et Investigatio CFQ


> Gens Constantinia is currently made by Italians only and was
created with that
> exact idea in mind, in order to, in time, become a pole of
attraction and
I hope the Censores shall respect their
> original ideas and visions rather than allowing just everyone
to "join"
> indiscriminately and put in place what it will be and would be felt
under all
> aspects as a legal hjiacking of someone's else ideas, work and
efforts.
>
>
> valete
>
> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
> Founder of Gens Constantinia
> Tribunus Plebis
> Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33732 From: C. Albius Gadelicus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
C. Albius Gadelicus A. Apollonio Cordo Quiritibusque salutem magnam
dicit -

Gratias tibi bone Corde ago...

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@y...> wrote:

> Correct. A gens now has no leader of any kind.

As I thought - but thank you for the confirmation.

> Yes. Anyone can join any gens, subject to the
> agreement of the censores or their delegates. This is
> in line with historical practice.

Always good to point out. :-) I've read that when Cicero freed his
two slaves Tiro and Dionysius, he called one of them Marcus Tullius
Tiro - adopting him to his own gens and making him a client - but the
other slave he called Marcus Pomponius Dionysius, thereby adopting
him into the gens of his (Cicero's) friend Titus Pomponius Atticus
and so perhaps making him a client of Titus' - a sort of gift,
perhaps.

> No, a prospective citizen does not have to write to
> the founder of the gens; yes, the words paterfamilias
> and materfamilias now refer exclusively to heads of familiae.

Fair enough - and in line with the above. Whoo, the site's gonna need
some changing, can't say as I envy those in charge...! :-)

Thanks again for your unofficial answers, bone Corde - some welcome
clarity! :-)

Bene vale, et valete
C. Albius Gadelicus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33733 From: Publius Minius Albucius Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Fw : a message from a new Am. Boreooccidentalis civis
P. Minius Albucius Propraetori J. Semproniae Magnae s.d.

S.V.G.E.R.

Here is below the letter that we, tribunes, have received :

>From: elberte@...
>To: albucius_aoe@...,
guido.costantini@...,rory12001@...,
imperialreign@...,mikko.sillanpaa@...
>Subject: (to tribunes) Recent Move
>Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:47:40 -0600 (CST)
>
>** This message was sent via http://www.novaroma.org/contact.php
>
>Salve,
>
>I am Gaius Irminius Scipio and have recently moved from Provinciea
America Austroccidentalis to America Boreoccidentalis and would like
to contact my porvincial govenor to be established on the rolls and
contact for any events. I am living in Seattle, and hope you can
help me.
>
>With respect,
>
>Gaius Irminius Scipio

I thought that getting contact with Irminius would interest you,
dear Propraetor.

Vale,

P. Minius Albucius
Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33734 From: M.ADRIANVS COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: EDICTVM PROPRAETORICIVM XXVIII (COMPLVTENSIS IV) DE TRIBVTO ANNO
Edicto sobre los impuestos para el año 2758.
Edict about the tax rates for year 2758.


Ex officio Propraetoris Hispaniae.

--------------------------
CASTILLIAN-SPANISH VERSION
--------------------------

I. De acuerdo con el Edicto Consular de febrero de 2758, los
ciudadanos novarromanos de la Provincia Hispania deberán abonar
CINCO EUROS (EUR 5.00) en concepto de tasas anuales a Nova Roma.

II. Los ciudadanos novarromanos que además sean miembros de la
Asociación Cultural Provincia Hispania Novae Romae pagarán en su
lugar la cuota anual de quince euros más las tasas de Nova Roma,
lo que hace un total de VEINTE EUROS (EUR 20.00).

III. En uno u otro caso, el medio de pago serán la transferencia
o el ingreso en la cuenta bancaria de la Asociación, cuyos datos
son los siguientes:

PROVINCIA HISPANIA NOVAE ROMAE
C.C.C. 0182-0929-77-0201515321
BBVA
Felix Boix 10
28016 MADRID

IV. Los ciudadanos que paguen este año sus impuestos y/o su
cuota asociativa deberán enviar un mensaje al Propraetor
(complutensis@...) indicando su nombre novarromano y
macronacional, su número de ID de ciudadano, la fecha en la que
hicieron el pago y la cantidad abonada (5 ó 20 euros).

V. Se establece como fecha límite para el abono de los impuestos
y de la cuota asociativa el día 29 de abril.

---------------
ENGLISH VERSION
---------------

I. According to the Consular Edict of february of year 2758, the
novarroman citizens from Provincia Hispania must pay FIVE EUROS
(EUR 5.00) in concept of yearly taxes to Nova Roma.

II. Those novarroman citizens who are also members of the
"Provincia Hispania Novae Romae" cultural association of Spain,
must pay instead the yearly membership tax of fifteen euros plus
the novarroman taxes, a total of TWENTY EUROS (EUR 20.00).

III. In one case or another, the payment will be made through
the association's bank account:

Bank name: BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA
Bank account number: 0182-0929-77-0201515321
Titular: PROVINCIA HISPANIA NOVAE ROMAE

IV. Citizens paying their taxes this year should send an email
to the Propraetor (complutensis@...) with his/her
novarroman and macronational name, his/her citizen ID, the date
of payment and the amount of taxes paid (5 or 20 euros).

V. The last day to make the payment of the novarroman and the
association taxes will be april 29th.

---------------

Hispaniae, ante diem XIV Kalendas Martias anno MMDCCLVIII ab
Vrbe condita, Francisco Apulo Caesare et Gaio Popillio Laena
consulibus.


MARCVS ADRIANVS COMPLVTENSIS
PROPRAETOR HISPANIAE
SCRIBA CENSORIS CFQ
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33735 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Salvete Censores et omnes,

I was reviewing the Album Gentium and see that some of the families
say they are "open" or that they are "not accepting new members". I
gather that this is irrelevant now so should those subscripts be
struck off the gentium list now so as not to confuse new people
applying to citizenship in NR?


Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33736 From: Julilla Sempronia Magna Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Fw : a message from a new Am. Boreooccidentalis civis
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Publius Minius Albucius"
<albucius_aoe@h...> wrote:
>
> P. Minius Albucius Propraetori J. Semproniae Magnae s.d.
> >
> >Salve,
> >
> >I am Gaius Irminius Scipio and have recently moved from Provinciea
> America Austroccidentalis to America Boreoccidentalis and would
like
> to contact my porvincial govenor to be established on the rolls and
> contact for any events. I am living in Seattle, and hope you can
> help me.
> >
> >With respect,
> >
> >Gaius Irminius Scipio
>
> I thought that getting contact with Irminius would interest you,
> dear Propraetor.
>
> Vale,
>
> P. Minius Albucius

It does indeed! Could you forward the request directly to me at
curatrix [at] villaivlilla.com and I will make sure that he and I
connect!

--
Julilla Sempronia Magna
> Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33737 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Salve Honorable C. Albius Gadelicus!

I am happy to se that You have got answers and hope this will be good enough.

I also have to admit that the offices of Magister Aranearius and
Censores will have much to do before the present data base is changed
to mirror the recent changes in the family laws even remotely. In the
end I am sure that the data base must be re-built from bottom up
before we can be fully satisfied.

>C. Albius Gadelicus A. Apollonio Cordo Quiritibusque salutem magnam
>dicit -
>
>Gratias tibi bone Corde ago...
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
><a_apollonius_cordus@y...> wrote:
>
>> Correct. A gens now has no leader of any kind.
>
>As I thought - but thank you for the confirmation.
>
>> Yes. Anyone can join any gens, subject to the
>> agreement of the censores or their delegates. This is
>> in line with historical practice.
>
>Always good to point out. :-) I've read that when Cicero freed his
>two slaves Tiro and Dionysius, he called one of them Marcus Tullius
>Tiro - adopting him to his own gens and making him a client - but the
>other slave he called Marcus Pomponius Dionysius, thereby adopting
>him into the gens of his (Cicero's) friend Titus Pomponius Atticus
>and so perhaps making him a client of Titus' - a sort of gift,
>perhaps.
>
>> No, a prospective citizen does not have to write to
>> the founder of the gens; yes, the words paterfamilias
>> and materfamilias now refer exclusively to heads of familiae.
>
>Fair enough - and in line with the above. Whoo, the site's gonna need
>some changing, can't say as I envy those in charge...! :-)
>
>Thanks again for your unofficial answers, bone Corde - some welcome
>clarity! :-)
>
>Bene vale, et valete
>C. Albius Gadelicus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of Roman Times Quartely
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33738 From: Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Senate mail address: rejected ?
Salvete Omnes,

Trying to send a report to the Senate, I have the following message :

"Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<senate@...>:
66.77.28.211 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 <senate@...>: Recipient address
rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
Giving up on 66.77.28.211."

Valete !

Lucius Rutilius Minervalis
Provinciae Galliae Propraetor
Aedilician Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33739 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Senate mail address: rejected ?
SALVE MINERVALIS !

Two weeks ago, when I trying to send a petition to the Senate I receive the same message.

VALE,
IVL SABINVS
DACIA PROVINCE

Lucius Rutilius Minervalis <pjtuloup@...> wrote:

Salvete Omnes,

Trying to send a report to the Senate, I have the following message :

"Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<senate@...>:
66.77.28.211 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 <senate@...>: Recipient address
rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
Giving up on 66.77.28.211."

Valete !

Lucius Rutilius Minervalis
Provinciae Galliae Propraetor
Aedilician Quaestor









Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
document.write('');

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33740 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
<christer.edling@t...> wrote:
> Salve Honorable C. Albius Gadelicus!
>
> I am happy to se that You have got answers and hope this will be
good enough.
>
> I also have to admit that the offices of Magister Aranearius and
> Censores will have much to do before the present data base is
changed
> to mirror the recent changes in the family laws even remotely. In
the
> end I am sure that the data base must be re-built from bottom up
> before we can be fully satisfied.

Salve,

As the Magister Aranearius I've done a few temporary work arounds
such as disable the emailing of "maters and paters" that they have
applicants awaiting approval as those are now basically spam,
disabled the mater/pater approval tools, and some modifications to
the album gentium and civium to at least semi-reflect the way things
are now "on paper."

However, there is a long way to go and there are many other issues
within the database that need to be addressed and addressed once and
for all. I concur with Caeso Fabius Quintilianus that it needs to
be rebuilt from scratch. Whether I and a team of dedicated
volunteers do it or Nova Roma has to hire a professional web
database design firm to do it remains to be seen as right now I've
only begun to scratch the surface.

However there is some good news on the website front:

Thanks to the help of P. Rutilius Bardulus Hadrianus the
transcribing of the Citizenship application into Spanish is nearing
completion. Just a few more things need to be translated and it
will be ready to go live.

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Magister Aranearius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33741 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Senate mail address: rejected ?
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, iulius sabinus
<iulius_sabinus@y...> wrote:
> SALVE MINERVALIS !
>
> Two weeks ago, when I trying to send a petition to the Senate I
receive the same message.
>
> VALE,
> IVL SABINVS
> DACIA PROVINCE

Salve,

Try: http://www.novaroma.org/contact.php and chose the Senate
option in the drop down menu.

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33742 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Senate mail address: rejected ?
SALVE CASSIUS CALVUS !

Thanks for your kindness. In the same day, I resolve in a different way.
I know, in a relative sense, what it means your work, and , personally, I belive you have a great work here.

OPTIME VALE,
IVL SABINVS
DACIA PROVINCE

quintuscassiuscalvus <richmal@...> wrote:

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, iulius sabinus
<iulius_sabinus@y...> wrote:
> SALVE MINERVALIS !
>
> Two weeks ago, when I trying to send a petition to the Senate I
receive the same message.
>
> VALE,
> IVL SABINVS
> DACIA PROVINCE

Salve,

Try: http://www.novaroma.org/contact.php and chose the Senate
option in the drop down menu.

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus





Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
document.write('');

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33743 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Salve Quinte Lani, et salvete quirites,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) wrote:
>
> Salvete Censores et omnes,
>
> I was reviewing the Album Gentium and see that some of the families
> say they are "open" or that they are "not accepting new members". I
> gather that this is irrelevant now so should those subscripts be
> struck off the gentium list now so as not to confuse new people
> applying to citizenship in NR?

As webmaster Calvus has mentioned, this is part of a long list of things
he has to deal with. He's working on them.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33744 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-02-16
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Salve Censor Marine,

Yes, thank you; I got that.


Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@c...> wrote:
> Salve Quinte Lani, et salvete quirites,
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) wrote:
> >
> > Salvete Censores et omnes,
> >
> > I was reviewing the Album Gentium and see that some of the
families
> > say they are "open" or that they are "not accepting new members".
I
> > gather that this is irrelevant now so should those subscripts be
> > struck off the gentium list now so as not to confuse new people
> > applying to citizenship in NR?
>
> As webmaster Calvus has mentioned, this is part of a long list of
things
> he has to deal with. He's working on them.
>
> Vale,
>
> -- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33746 From: Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Date: 2005-02-17
Subject: Re: Senate mail address: rejected ? (Thanks)
Salve Calvus,

Thanks ! I hope nevertheless that this anomaly will be corrected soon,
since too long messages (more than 1000 characters) cannot be
transmitted in this way...

Lucius Rutilius Minervalis
Provinciae Galliae Propraetor
Aedilician Quaestor


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "quintuscassiuscalvus"
<richmal@c...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, iulius sabinus
> <iulius_sabinus@y...> wrote:
> > SALVE MINERVALIS !
> >
> > Two weeks ago, when I trying to send a petition to the Senate I
> receive the same message.
> >
> > VALE,
> > IVL SABINVS
> > DACIA PROVINCE
>
> Salve,
>
> Try: http://www.novaroma.org/contact.php and chose the Senate
> option in the drop down menu.
>
> Vale,
>
> Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33747 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-02-17
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
A. Apollonius Cordus omnibus sal.

> As webmaster Calvus has mentioned, this is part of a
> long list of things
> he has to deal with. He's working on them.

And until the changes to the album gentium / civium
are complete, it's worth remembering what the ancient
Romans did when they wanted to know someone's name,
family, and other details:

Ask. ;)





___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33748 From: Salvia Sempronia Graccha Date: 2005-02-17
Subject: soror nova mea
Avete et salvete! Salvia Sempronia Graccha salutem plurimam dicit.
It is my great pleasure to introduce the second member of domus
Sempronia Graccha, soror mea sui iuris, Postuma Sempronia Graccha
Placidia, of Londinium, Britannia Provincia. This is actually a
reintroduction, for
she was formerly known as Placidia Prisca. A Stoic and sister Marcus
Aurelius fan, she has been an active Roman pagan for some time and makes
daily devotions to Minerva and the Di Immortales at her lararium. She was
one of the first to welcome me to Nova Roma, so I take special delight in
welcoming her to domus S.G.
Valete! Habitetis in luce deorum.
Salvia Sempronia Graccha
Soror Maior Domus Semproniae Gracchae



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33749 From: Maxima Date: 2005-02-17
Subject: Re: Women in Britains Roman Army Deja Vu?
Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:

Ave;
here it is pro and con.

Con: women wove
Pro: they did not

vale
Marca Hortensia Maior, the original culprit;-

And that about saids it all, really.

Maxima Valeria Messallina, sister instigator.....


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! � Get yours free!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33750 From: g_iulius_scaurus Date: 2005-02-17
Subject: Report of the Caerimonia of the Quirinalia
G. Iulius Scaurus SPD

Salvete, Quirites.

Today is the feria of the Quirinalia.

To observe this feria I performed the following caerimonia.

I bathed in preparation, then, garbed in toga praetexta, cinctu Gabino, capite velato, I
began the praefatio.

Praefatio

"Iane Pater, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces precor, uti sies volens propitius mihi et
Senatui Populoque Novae Romae [Father Ianus, by offering this incense to you I pray
virtuous prayers, so that you may be willingly propitious to me and the Senate and People
of Nova
Roma"]. I placed incense in the focus of the altar.

"Iuppiter Optime Maxime, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces precor, uti sies volens
propitius mihi et Senatui Populoque Novae Romae [Iuppiter Best and Greatest, by offering
this incense to you I pray virtuous prayers, so that you may be willingly propitious to me
and the Senate and People of Nova Roma"]. I placed incense in the focus of the altar.

"Iuno Dea, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces precor, uti sies volens propitia mihi et
Senatui Populoque Novae Romae [Goddess Iuno, by offering this incense to you I pray
virtuous prayers, so that you may be willingly propitious to me and the Senate and People
of Nova Roma"]. I placed incense in the focus of the altar.

"Minerva Dea, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces precor, uti sies volens propitia mihi et
Senatui Populoque Novae Romae [Goddess Minerva, by offering this incense to you I pray
virtuous prayers, so that you may be willingly propitious to me and the Senate and People
of Nova Roma." I placed incense in the focus of the altar.

"Mars Pater, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces precor, uti sies volens propitius mihi et
Senatui Populoque Novae Romae [Father Mars, by offering this incense to you I pray
virtuous prayers, so that you may be willingly propitious to me and the Senate and People
of Nova Roma.]" I placed incense in the focus of the altar.

"Iane Pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum, eiusdem rei ergo
macte vino inferio esto [Father Ianus, as by offering to you the incense I prayed virtuous
prayers well, for the sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a
libation on the altar.

"Iuppiter Optime Maxime, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Iuppiter Best and Greatest, as by offering to you
the incense I prayed virtuous prayers well, for the sake of this be honoured by this
humble wine.]" I poured a libation on the altar.

"Iuno Dea, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum, eiusdem rei ergo
macte vino inferio esto [Goddess Iuno, as by offering to you the incense I prayed virtuous
prayers well, for the sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a
libation on the altar.

"Minerva Dea, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum, eiusdem rei ergo
macte vino inferio esto [Goddess Minerva, as by offering to you the incense I prayed
virtuous prayers well, for the sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured
a libation on the altar.

"Mars Pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum, eiusdem rei ergo
macte vino inferio esto [Father Mars, as by offering to you the incense I prayed virtuous
prayers well, for the sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a
libation on the altar.

I washed my hands in preparation for the praecatio.

Precatio

"Quirine Pater, qui rex bellicus erat et in astra deus est, conditor urbis et pater populi
Romanorum Quiritum, tibi fieri oportet culignam vini dapi, eius rei ergo hac illace dape
pullucenda esto [Father Quirinus, who was a warlike king and is among the stars a God,
founder of the city and father of the Roman people, the Quirites, to you it is proper for a
cup of wine to be given, for the sake of this thing therefore may you be honoured by this
feast offering]." I poured a libation on the altar.

Again I washed my hands in preparation for the redditio.

Redditio

" Quirine Pater, conditor, rex et defensor urbis et pater populi Romanorum Quiritum, qui
lupa capitolina mammam datus est, macte istace dape pollucenda esto, macte hoc lacte
nutrienti esto, macte vino inferio esto [Father Quirinus, founder, king, and protector of the
city and father of the Roman people, the Quirites, who was suckled by the Capitoline she-
wolf, may you be honoured by this feast offering, may you be honoured by this nourishing
milk, may you be honoured by the humble wine.]" I offered Quirinus Pater honey cakes,
milk, and wine on the altar.

"Mars pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum, eiusdem rei ergo
macte vino inferio esto [Father Mars, as by offering to you the incense I prayed virtuous
prayers well, for the sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a
libation on the altar.

"Minerva Dea, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum, eiusdem rei ergo
macte vino inferio esto [Goddess Minerva, as by offering to you the incense I prayed
virtuous prayers well, for the sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured
a libation on the altar.

"Iuno Dea, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum, eiusdem rei ergo
macte vino inferio esto [Goddess Iuno, as by offering to you the incense I prayed virtuous
prayers well, for the sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a
libation on the altar.

"Iuppiter Optime Maxime, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo macte vino inferio esto [Iuppiter Best and Greatest, as by offering to you
the incense I prayed virtuous prayers well, for the sake of this be honoured by this
humble wine.]" I poured a libation on the altar.

"Iane Pater, uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum, eiusdem rei ergo
macte vino inferio esto [Father Ianus,as by offering to you the incense I prayed virtuous
prayers well, for the sake of this be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a
libation on the altar.

"Vesta Dea, custos ignis sacri, macte vino inferio esto [Goddess Vesta, guardian of the
sacred fire, be honoured by this humble wine.]" I poured a libation on the altar.

"Illicet [It is permitted to go.]"

I profaned wine, milk, and honey cakes, and I partook of the epulum with Quirinus Pater,
praying as I ate and offering libations in my private devotions.

Piaculum

Since the historical caerimonia of the feria of the Quirinalia has not yet been recovered (in
fact we know virtually nothing about it) , I offered a piaculum to Quirinus Pater if anything
in this caerimonia should offend him:

"Quirine Pater, si quidquam tibi in hac caerimonia displicet, hoc ture veniam peto et vitium
meum expio [Father Quirinus, if anything in this ceremony is displeasing to you, with this
incense I ask forgiveness and expiate my fault.]" I offered incense on the altar.

"Quirine Pater, si quidquam tibi in hac caerimonia displicet, hoc vino inferio veniam peto et
vitium meum expio [Father Quirinus, if anything in this ceremony is displeasing to you,
with this humble wine I ask forgiveness and expiate my fault.]" I poured a libation on the
altar.

Valete.

G. Iulius Scaurus
Pontifex et Flamen Quirinalis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33751 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-02-17
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Salve,

I've been working on that. It's a process of trial and error (and a
lot of error, but don't worry I back whatever file I'm working on up
before I do anything). I've got some of the "bugs" worked out, but
there are still some little pests hiding in the corners I need to
ferret out. If you log into the album gentium or album civium and
see some weird stuff you know:

a. I'm working on the various fixes
b. I'm swearing and cussing because I was absolutely sure that this
would do the trick and it didn't.

Of course on the odd chance I did it right then there should be no
strange output from the script calls.

Vale

Q. Cassius Calvus





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Censores et omnes,
>
> I was reviewing the Album Gentium and see that some of the
families
> say they are "open" or that they are "not accepting new members".
I
> gather that this is irrelevant now so should those subscripts be
> struck off the gentium list now so as not to confuse new people
> applying to citizenship in NR?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33752 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-02-17
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Salve,

I've been working on that. It's a process of trial and error (and a
lot of error, but don't worry I back whatever file I'm working on up
before I do anything). I've got some of the "bugs" worked out, but
there are still some little pests hiding in the corners I need to
ferret out. If you log into the album gentium or album civium and
see some weird stuff you know:

a. I'm working on the various fixes
b. I'm swearing and cussing because I was absolutely sure that this
would do the trick and it didn't.

Of course on the odd chance I did it right then there should be no
strange output from the script calls.

Vale

Q. Cassius Calvus





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Censores et omnes,
>
> I was reviewing the Album Gentium and see that some of the
families
> say they are "open" or that they are "not accepting new members".
I
> gather that this is irrelevant now so should those subscripts be
> struck off the gentium list now so as not to confuse new people
> applying to citizenship in NR?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33753 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2005-02-17
Subject: A question for our citizens in Italia
C. Minucius Hadrianus S.P.D.

Salvete.

My wife and I are planning on spending a week in Roma at the end of
April - beginning of May, and we were looking at staying at the hotel
Crowne Plaza Saint Peters (Via Aurelia Antica 415
Rome,) which we've found an excellent deal on. Is anyone familiar with
this hotel or the immediate area?

We're planning on taking day trips to both Pompeii & Ostia, but as this
will be our first time in Roma, we would also love any suggestions on
places to visit or eat!

Valete,

Hadrianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33754 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-18
Subject: Re: A question for our citizens in Italia
Salve

> My wife and I are planning on spending a week in Roma at the end of
> April - beginning of May, and we were looking at staying at the hotel
> Crowne Plaza Saint Peters (Via Aurelia Antica 415
> Rome,) which we've found an excellent deal on. Is anyone familiar with
> this hotel or the immediate area?

Not with the hotel itself and just a littl eabout the area, which has a
good side and a bad side: the good isde is that it is a pretty peaceful,
calmful area, the bad side is that it i spoorly connected with downtown an
lacks an underground station near, which means you will probably end up,
especially in the evening, using taxis, as the bus service in Rome is...
well... admittedly pretty poor, much to our shame.


> We're planning on taking day trips to both Pompeii & Ostia, but as this
> will be our first time in Roma, we would also love any suggestions on
> places to visit or eat!

I'm leaving to Budapest this afternoon and I'm on a real hurry atm, but if
you drop me a reminder sunday evening on monday, I'll get back to you
about that.

Vale

DCF
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33756 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-02-18
Subject: Consular Quaestor
G. Popillius Laenas Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit.

I have neglected to announce that Tiberius Galerius Paulinus will be
serving as my Consular Quaestor this year.

I correct that via this edict.

Valete bene.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33757 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-02-18
Subject: Re: A question for our citizens in Italia
M' C SERAPIO C MINVCIO HADRIANO SPD

I'm very happy you will be visiting Rome! As to your question Fuscus
already answered (and after all I don't live in Rome so I wouldn't
be of help).

Still it's quite unfortunate you will be coming in that period, just
after the great celebrations for Rome's birthday but before the Nova
Roma Rally in August!
Are you sure you can't come a bit earlier or postpone your trip at
the beginning of August?
Of course you might have very good reasons to choose that specific
period, but wouldn't it be a shame to come right between these two
major events, thus loosing both of them?
If you have some freedom in choosing the priod, I'd suggest you to
reconsider! ;-)

OPTIME VALE
M'C.Serapio
Propraetor Italiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33758 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2005-02-18
Subject: Re: A question for our citizens in Italia
C. Minucius Hadrianus Felix S.P.D.

Salvete.

Another hotel that we're looking at is the Hotel Santa Maria in
Trastevere. It looks like a very nice place. Does anyone know of it?

http://www.htlsantamaria.com

Valete,

Hadrianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33759 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-02-18
Subject: FW: "Livius ut narrat verax".
Flavia Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque omnibus
praesertim Latineloquentibus S.P.D.

In light of the mention of recent archaeological excavations confirming
Livy, I thought the Latineloquentes among you might enjoy the following poem
forwarded from an all-Latin mailing list. The references at the end are to
another sodalis, Victorius, and to another who had left the group.

Valete,

Flavia Tullia Scholastica



----------
From: Kenneth Walsh <address snipped>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:42:36 +0100
Subject: Re: "Livius ut narrat verax".

Carolo Kenanus spd

Modo legi poemata ad ruinas Romanas a te amoenissime scripta quae re vera
mentem et aures delectant. Laudes in auctorem cumulo acervoque. Gratulor
tibi. Vale, Kenanus

Ad ruinas Palatii

O detecta tandem Romuli tecta,
o saecula post octo lumine tacta
iam venitis confirmatum ea dicta
Livii quae dubitavit turba docta!
Urbis aeternae conditoris lares,
regia domus, unde istuc appares?
Heri eras merus pulvis et oblivio,
Hodie venis subsidio Tito Livio.
Fabula fuisti, reponeris in Historia
quasi gesta surrecta ex memoria.
Qualia feruntur prodire e fossa
qua contitentur scelerata ossa
phantasmata, vos, nuper effossa
contradicitis iam criticis perossa
multa cera posita in eorum rostra!
Statne in area rustica columna vostra?
Haec pagina est patens ad studia nostra.
Venitis ad levandum regis desiderium,
qui condidit (re vera) istud imperium.
Tu autem visne remittere, Victori mi,
litteras, quas citatas habes, (1) mihi? (2)
Nam scripseras de sodale relecto tibi,
cuius lacrimas de Palatio ferme bibi...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33760 From: Legion XXIV Date: 2005-02-18
Subject: Legion XXIV Vicesima Quarta Newslewtter Jan-Feb 2005
VICESIMA QUARTA
The Newsletter of
LEGION XXIV - MEDIA ATLANTIA

JANUARY - FEBRUARY 2005

Gallio Velius Marsallas / George Metz
Praefectus - Commander
13 Post Run - Newtown Square PA 19073-3014
610-353-4982
legionxxiv@... www.legionxxiv.org

Commilitones

Things have been rather quiet during "Winter Quarters", so the Vicesima Quarta was delayed hoping something would happen or come-up.

ADVENAE - Newcomers
*** Taylor Dodson wolfwelp@... is signing on as a part of our Mid-West Vexillation.
She, yes a women, will be portraying an auxiliary cavalry scout. Taylor has her own horse and is an archer, and the prospect of having a cavalry archer impression in the unit is rather exciting. She is working with another rather new member, John Shook, who is organizing an auxiliary contingent within the unit.
*** Frank McChristian (Marcus Velius Tacitus) fmcchris909@... of Hampton Bays, NY, is joining NovaRoma and becoming a member of our Family Gens Velius. He is a write and a musician (Tuba -Cornu? we hope) and is interested in the Religio, Culture and History of Rome.

*** Please join me in welcoming these new members to our ranks.

AUXILIARY CONTINGENT FORMING UP
One of our newer members, John Shook, Titus Flavius Ambiorix starbulldog@... is organizing an auxiliary unit, based within our Mid-West Vexillation. Chris Goshey, Tiberius Claudius Phillipos and Taylor Dodson and one other are getting themselves together. We hope to have them with us during our Mid-West campaigns.

TWO DAY SCHOOL CAMPAIGN
Your Commander spent two days at the Princeton Day School in Princeton, NJ on Feb-15 and 16. The first day was with two classes doing a military lectures and demonstrations. The usual battle shield line and testudo formations were formed, with the students joining in with their own hand-made cardboard scuta. The sessions ended with the potential recruits coming forward to try out the helmets and armor. On Wednesday, the 16th, the Commander and new recruit Leon Delgado turned out with John Ebel's Ludus Magnus for a 3 hour gladiator lecture, show and fight. This was Leon's first tour of duty with the Legion and he was trying out his new Corbridge-A lorica from Joe Piela of Lonely Mountain Forge. He is coming along quite well with his new lorica, a scutum, tunic and caligae. He is quite enthusiastic and we look forward to having him with us during upcoming campaigns.
The Ludus Magnus put-on their usual great and active demonstration. "Maximus" Ebel, the "Wolf" & Pauline Cattellier, Aulus & Patrick Barbato and James Massimillo "layed-on" during four engagements, with kids really getting into the spirit of the event cheering on their favorites during the four battles that were staged in the school gymnasium.

The Mighty Maximus stated in a follow-up e-mail to the event, that he was quite pleased in seeing Patrick developing into a fine young man, and one hell of an able fighter uplifting him each time they gathered. The sight of the lovely gladiatrix, Lady Paulina kicking the sweet bejeezus out of the "Wolf" was a pure delight to watch. And to behold the way Gaius Massimillo of Macedonia had become an able and aggressive fighter, even becoming a bit cocky in the arena, was a source of inspiration to him. The smile on Al's face after an event as he inventories his many wounds is purely amazing to him each time.

The Commander does about a dozen school class room and auditorium demo's a year enhancing the learning experience of students, keeping him occupied between the major outdoor campaigns.

FOR SALE
Owen Hutchins is selling his lorica segmentata. It was made by Joe Piella, and fits about a 50" chest.
It has a little rust which he'll remove off prior to sale, and has been banged up a little, but is otherwise
in good shape. Asking price $350. Contact him directly at owenbrau@...


MORE GEAR UP FOR GRABS ?
The Mighty Maximus John Ebel is selling his legionary gear.
** Type "A" Lorica segmentata - size 44-46; never used and in excellent condition, and with a custom-made stand to display it . .
** Gallic "G" helmet with sideways cream/black officer's crest . . .
** Pompeii gladius with sheath and baldric . .
** Mainz gladius with sheath and baldric . . .
** Red, cream military tunics (2). . . .
** Hand-made caligae (brown leather; military-style). . . .
** Patera, canteen
He is asking for a package price of $1,200. This is a complete set-up, minus only pilia and an apron-style military belt.
If any new recruits are looking for a full set up, please contact John at gladius1@...

**** Our sister Legion XX in Maryland also has some legionary equipment up for grabs and their Commander Matt Amt is making it available to his members and Legion XXIV before he advertises it in his newsletter.
** Ed Safford, one of the Legion XX's co-founders of old, is selling off several items.
** A Crest for a helmet is still available, red horsehair in a red wood block, made by myself and Ed.
It comes with a nice steel support, and an excellent wooden storage and carrying box that Ed made. $75
** Hand-forged Mainz Gladius, $300. Second from left in this photo: http://www.larp.com/legioxx/gladii3.jpg
** Wonderful blade by Dave Stone, hilt and scabbard by Matthew Amt.
The grip is wood and a little skinny, but it can be replaced with a bone one very easily. Pommel and guard are walnut.
Scabbard is a simple brass frame with a nice finial over green linen-covered wood.
Very easy to add decorated plates or replace the linen with leather, etc. Has a baldric with a buckle.
Matt has the crest and sword at his my castra, and can bring them to any event or workshop, etc.
You can either pay him (cash or check) or write a check out to Ed, and he will forward it to him.
** One or two marching satchels for sale, $100 each.
Won't these bargains look great under your Christmas tree? Order today!
Don't delay! Anything that doesn't sell will end up being advertised, and could end up going off to some far off distant land to Romans we don't know - or worse - to E-Bay - Horrors!!
Valete, Matthew/Quintus, Legio XX "Emporium" mamt@... legioxx@...

CATAPULTA UNDERGOES IMPROVEMENT
The Engine of Terror now has a new tail prop attached in a more historic manner, replacing the rather hokey hinge arrangement, which worked well, but was just not historically correct. Two 3/8 inch thick 464 naval brass plates mounted to the sides of the tail section now carry the prop leg. The new mounting is more sturdy and rigid and looks more appropriate and heroic, given the reputation of our catapulta. Next - A more correct trigger mechanism.



LEGION XXIV WEBSITE CONTINUES TO GROW
The Legions website continues to expand and is now one of the most extensive sites dealing with Roman Army reenactment and Roman military history, as well as other history relating to Ancient Rome. The Site is now composed of the Home Page from which emanate 24 Secondary Pages, which lead to 20 Detail Pages. The Photo Gallery Page points to 22 additional pages of captioned pictures and detail narrative. Appended to the Site is a set of four pages dealing with the Commanders activities in the Star Wars Universe. These Sci-Fi Pages are augmented by 20 secondary photo and detail pages. In total, the entire Site comprises 92 separate pages, 612 photos and images, 216 links to external sites and 553 internal links within the site, AND no pop-up ad's or commercial advertising! The Site is updated several times a month, so you want to check in often. The Commander built the site beginning in early 1998 and pays for its hosting service on behalf of the Legion.
After learning all these facts about the Legion XXIV Website, you should be clicking on www.legionxxiv.org NOW!

UPCOMING CAMPAIGNS for 2005
*** Feb 15-16 Two days of demonstrations at the Princeton Day School, near Princeton, NJ. The Ludus Magnus Gladiators
will be doing a demo on the 16th as well.
*** April 16-17 Marching through Time, Marietta Mansion, Glendale, MD
*** May 13-14 Roman Days Northeast, Fairgrounds, Woodstock, CN. The Commander cannot attend, but other Legion members are most encouraged to take part. An interesting and varied program is planned.
*** June 3-5, Roman Days, Marietta Mansion, Glenn Dale, MD. Includes visits by school groups on Friday, and possibly a mini-symposium on Thursday.
*** July 30-31, Annual Fort Malden Military Days, Amherstburg, Ontario
*** August 16-20, Pennsic War, Coopers Lake Campground, New Castle, PA, I-79 and Rt 422
*** October 22-23, Probable Ren Faire appearance, Waterloo Village, Netcong, NJ, I-80-exit 25 11AM-5PM

Get that armor and gear in shape for the upcoming Spring Campaigns! That's an Order! Get to It!


Thanking you for your continued support of Legion XXIV, I remain;

Yours in the Bonds of Ancient Rome

Gallio / George



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33762 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-02-19
Subject: Ruins may support tale of Rome's origin
Salve Romans

FYI From the front page of the Washington Times

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus



Ruins may support tale of Rome's origin


By Rachel Sanderson
REUTERS NEWS AGENCY


ROME -- Italian archaeologists digging in the Forum have unearthed the ruins of a palace they say confirms the legend of Rome's birth " a discovery that may force the rewriting of Western history.


Most contemporary historians dismiss as fable the tale that Romulus founded Rome in 753 B.C. and built a walled city on the slopes of the Palatine hill where he and his twin brother, Remus, were suckled by a wolf in their infancy.


Andrea Carandini of Rome's La Sapienza University has spent 20 years trying to prove the skeptics wrong and last month he and his team hit on the final piece of a puzzle he believes shows the myth has root in fact.
"Archaeology and legend appear to go better together than contemporary historians thought," Mr. Carandini said in an interview before presentation of his findings this weekend.


"We now have all the elements to show that part of the legend may very well be true."
The source of Mr. Carandini's confidence is the discovery of traces of an 8th century B.C. house of regal proportions on the edge of the Forum that dates from the period of the Eternal City's legendary founding.
Found 10 yards or so beneath pines growing on the surface of the Palatine and under centuries of construction from classical to Renaissance times, the palace had a courtyard and covered inner area spanning an estimated 3,800 square feet.
Wooden columns marked its entrances, ceramics decorated it and seats were located against the walls of a grand central hall.
It is located by the Sanctuary of Vesta, the Roman goddess of the hearth, close to the slopes of the Palatine, the site of the earliest traces of Roman civilization and where legend has it Romulus killed Remus before building Rome.
Most historians have always dismissed Rome's founding myth because they argued the Eternal City was just a huddle of wattle huts at the time Roman historian Livy described Romulus fortifying the Palatine and showing "outward symbols of power."
Mr. Carandini, who has also found traces of sanctuaries, a defensive wall and a shingle Forum floor dating from the same period, said that view will now have to change.


"It is exceptional, a find of maximum importance," he said. "It could only be a palace fit for a king." Scholars elsewhere, when asked for their reaction to the finds, tended to be more cautious.
"The palace is completely convincing. In the 8th century B.C. people tended to live in tiny, sub-oval huts. This structure is much larger and rectangular. But this does not have a direct link to the Romulus myth," said Elizabeth Fentress, an archaeology research fellow at the British School in Rome.
"The tradition is based on royalty and an orderly community, but that does not mean that Romulus killed Remus."






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33764 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-02-20
Subject: Reminder: Cista open:
Salvete,

A reminder that the Cista is open for voting in the Comitia Populi
Tributa and the Comitia Plebis Tributa.

The Comitia Populi Tributa is open until 12:01 Rome Time XV (25)
February for voting on two leges. The text of these two leges are
available at:
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/edicts/tribune-2005-01-26.html

The Comitia Plebis Tributa is open until 18:00 Rome Time XV (25)
February for election of one Plebian Aedile.

The Cista is located at
http://www.novaroma.org/cursus_honorum/voting/

Valete,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33765 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-20
Subject: Re: Reminder: Cista open: Vote AGAINST!
Salvete Quirites,

quintuscassiuscalvus <richmal@...> writes:

> The Comitia Populi Tributa is open until 12:01 Rome Time XV (25)
> February for voting on two leges. The text of these two leges are
> available at:
> http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/edicts/tribune-2005-01-26.html

I ask all citizens to please vote, and to vote *against* the two proposed
laws. The first one seeks to impose unnecessary and ill-considered
requirements on the Plebeian and Curule Aediles, while diminishing the
importance of the Quaestors assigned to the Aediles. The second one would
impose reporting requirements on the Censores which constitute an imposition
on the independence of their office. As much as I'd like to see the
questions surrounding resignations clarified in law, this proposed lex
contains 'poison pill' provisions that prevent me from being able to support
it.

Quirites interested in longer explanations of all the things that are wrong
with these laws may wish to read the two excellent posts by Cordus posted on
January 25th.

"On the proposed Minian law on resignations"
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/32918

"On the proposed Minian law on the plebeian aediles"
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/32917

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33766 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-20
Subject: Voting on the Resignation Law
M. Hortensia Maior Quiritibus spd;
Salvete, these are the laws regarding the resignation of citizens
and their offices as well as the plebian aediles.
Regarding the resignation law, after a quick look I must say that
I firmly disagree with permitting a resigning official

a) to continue his duties during the 8 day period

b) this would still allow a resigning tribune to return, unelected
by the Plebians. I regard the approval of the other tribunes and
Censors as a usurpation of the rights of the Plebs.

Now, I might be wrong in this, but we certainly should discuss it
before we vote on this law!

Remember Plebians, guard your rights. Make informed choices before
you vote.
bene valete in pace deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior TRP

Propraetrix Hiberniae
caput Officina Iuriis
et Investigatio CFQ
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33767 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-02-20
Subject: Re: Voting on the Resignation Law Just say NO!
Salve Romans

My views on why a magistrate should not and currently does not return to office after resigning either his office or his office and citizenship needs no elaboration from me. I ask respectfully that as a service to the rule of law and for magistrates who take their offices and their oaths seriously that you vote against this and any Lex that would allow a grace period for a magistrate to withdraw his or her resignation from office.

If you have macro national needs, that are serious enough to ponder and then submit your resignation as a magistrate then a day or two weeks later is not enough time to get it together. The act of resignation regardless of the need for it is a repudiation of the "agreement" you have made with the Romans that elected you to office. If you need to resign PLEASE have the decency not to sneak back in to office without a renewed grant of office by the voters of the Republic.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: Maior<mailto:rory12001@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 12:20 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re:Voting on the Resignation Law



M. Hortensia Maior Quiritibus spd;
Salvete, these are the laws regarding the resignation of citizens
and their offices as well as the plebian aediles.
Regarding the resignation law, after a quick look I must say that
I firmly disagree with permitting a resigning official

a) to continue his duties during the 8 day period

b) this would still allow a resigning tribune to return, unelected
by the Plebians. I regard the approval of the other tribunes and
Censors as a usurpation of the rights of the Plebs.

Now, I might be wrong in this, but we certainly should discuss it
before we vote on this law!

Remember Plebians, guard your rights. Make informed choices before
you vote.
bene valete in pace deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior TRP

Propraetrix Hiberniae
caput Officina Iuriis
et Investigatio CFQ




Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=129g5nhpv/M=324658.6070095.7083352.3001176/D=groups/S=1705313712:HM/EXP=1109006497/A=2343726/R=0/SIG=12i5a9mop/*http://clk.atdmt.com/VON/go/yhxxxvon01900091von/direct/01/&time=1108920097324360>
Get unlimited calls to

U.S./Canada

<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=129g5nhpv/M=324658.6070095.7083352.3001176/D=groups/S=1705313712:HM/EXP=1109006497/A=2343726/R=1/SIG=12i5a9mop/*http://clk.atdmt.com/VON/go/yhxxxvon01900091von/direct/01/&time=1108920097324360>



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/>

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33768 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-02-20
Subject: Re: Voting on the Resignation Law Just say NO!
A. Apollonius Cordus Ti. Galerio Paulino omnibusque
sal.

I agree with you, but I think it's important to say
that people really should vote 'no' to this proposal
even if they *do* think magistrates should be given 9
days to reconsider.

What we will probably get if this proposal is approved
is utter confusion. A magistrate who resigns will be
able to change his mind, but only by sending an e-mail
to a certain place with a certain selection of words
in the subject-line. This means magistrates will be
able to resign and then come back, but only if they
happen to remember or look up the precise wording of
the lex Minia.

And even if a returning magistrate avoids that
particular trap, his colleagues will be able to veto
his return to office (except in the highly unlikely
event that he resigned but then continued diligently
to perform his magisterial duties). This
simultaneously violates two of the most fundamental
constitutional principles of the republic. First, it
violates the principle that only the populus can
create or depose a magistrate. Second, it violates the
principle that no magistrate can choose his own
colleague.

If all this proposal did was to let magistrates resign
and then change their minds, I would oppose it, but
frankly I wouldn't be too bothered. What really
bothers me is that in practice it will create as much
confusion as it solves, and in principle it is
unconstitutional in the true meaning of the word.





___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33769 From: Salvia Sempronia Graccha Date: 2005-02-20
Subject: Close call from viral message.
Moniti este, amici omnes! Salvia Sempronia Graccha salutem plurimam
dicit.
Do not open the attachment on any message that looks like the following:

�From: cmarius_m@...
Subject: Re: Thank you for delivery

First part of the secure mail is available.�

Valete! Habitetis in luce deorum.
Salvia Sempronia Graccha
Verbum sat sapienti.

P.S. I�m about three weeks behind on my Main List Digests--amazing how
nontoxic life can be when one ignores the Main List--so if someone else
has already delivered this warning, my apologies for the redundancy.




__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33770 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-21
Subject: Re: A question for our citizens in Italia
Salve

> Another hotel that we're looking at is the Hotel Santa Maria in
> Trastevere. It looks like a very nice place. Does anyone know of it?
>
> http://www.htlsantamaria.com


I do not know the hotel itself, but the area is much, much better. From there,
you can simply walk to half the most significant locations of the city and you
can either walk (a bit more) or get one of the many connections to the other
half. Also, Trastevere is one of the best places in the city for restourants
and pubs and definitely a better "base of operations" altogether. With all the
rest equal, I'd go for this one.. actually, I'd go for this one also if it did
cost a bit more than the other.

Vale

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33771 From: TiAnO Date: 2005-02-21
Subject: Re: Consular Edict Tax Rates for 2758 a.u.c. / resignation
Salvete omnes

I write this to you in order to officially state, that I no longer have the time to act as official translator for German!!

This has taken me a long time to decide, but now I am very sure about this step and very sorry for Nova Roma. I will stay on as pater familias of Gens Annaea or whatever the new family thing will be, but not pay taxes except someone would like to pay them for me.

I hope you will soon find a replacement for me, TiAnO




Tiberius Annaeus Otho (TiAnO) Factio Praesina
Lictor curiatus of Nova Roma
Translator linguae Germanicae for Nova Roma
Paterfamilias gentis Annaearum
Praefectus scribarum regionis Germaniae Superioris in Nova Roma
Tribunus laticlavius militum legionis XI CPF
Owner of the winning chariot in the Ludi Victoriae Caesaris

Homepage: http://www.tiano.ch.tt or http://www.tylus.ch.tt

Citizen of the NRR




---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33773 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2005-02-21
Subject: Edictum XVII Brasiliae Provinciae - New legate
L. Arminius Faustus propraetor Brasiliae SPD

I. By this edictum, I make citizen Titus Arminius Genialis as legatus of the propraetor.

II. This legatus will share the propraetorician Imperium on the task of divulgation and spreading of Nova Roma in the city of Campinas-SP, its university and neighborhoods.

III. I adress the legatus the following of all roman virtues on his task, and the obeyance of all rules of folders/panflet distribution and divulgation.

IV. The legatus will have all Imperium to represent the propraetor in Campinas-SP, its university and neighborhoods.

---

I. Por este édito, eu faço o cidadão T. Arminius Genialis como legado do propretor.

II. Este legado irá compartilhar o Império propretorício na tarefa de divulgação e espalhar Nova Roma na cidade de Campinas-SP, sua universidade e vizinhanças.

III. Eu recomendo ao legado a observação de todas as virtudes romanas em sua tarefa e a obediência às regras de divulgação e distribuição de panfletos/ ´folders´

IV. O legado terá Imperium para representar o prepretor na cidade de Campinas-SP, sua universidade e vizinhanças.

Dado no sexto dia após os idos de fevereiro de 2758 da fundação da cidade.

Valete bene in pacem deorum,
L. Arminius Faustus


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador do Yahoo! agora.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33774 From: KECTAM@aol.com Date: 2005-02-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 1824
Salvete.

I should like to thank Salvia Sempronia Graccha and, also, Julilla Sempronia
Magna for the warmth of their welcome to Gens Sempronia and the domus of
Sempronia Graccha.

Valete,

Postuma Sempronia Graccha Placidia
(formerly Placidia Prisca)


In a message dated 18/02/2005 15:44:36 GMT Standard Time,
Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com writes:

Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:39:55 -0800 (PST)
From: Salvia Sempronia Graccha <alysentellure@...>
Subject: soror nova mea


Avete et salvete! Salvia Sempronia Graccha salutem plurimam dicit. It is
my great pleasure to introduce the second member of domus Sempronia Graccha,
soror mea sui iuris, Postuma Sempronia Graccha Placidia, of Londinium,
Britannia Provincia. This is actually a reintroduction, for she was formerly known
as Placidia Prisca.

She was one of the first to welcome me to Nova Roma, so I take special
delight in
welcoming her to domus S.G.


Valete! Habitetis in luce deorum.



Salvia Sempronia Graccha
Soror Maior Domus Semproniae Gracchae





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33775 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-02-21
Subject: ATTENTION: Invalid Vote in Comitia Plebis
Quintus Metellus Diribitor Quiritibus salutem dicit.

The vote cast with tracking number 3144 in the Comitia Plebis Tributa is invalid due to a malformed voter code. If this is your vote, please check your voter code, and recast your vote.

As a bit of advice, which I remember coming from a certain chief rogator of last year, I recommend copying your voter code (using the "Copy" command) directly from the email containing it, then pasting it directly into the cista. (These two commands on Windows machines are "Control+C" and "Control+V", respectively.) It's all too easy to mistype the code by one character.

Valete Optime,

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Pius
Diribitor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33776 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-02-21
Subject: ATTENTION: Invalid Votes in Comitia Populi
Quintus Metellus Diribitor Quiritibus salutem dicit.

The vote cast with tracking number 5619 in the Comitia Populi Tributa is invalid due to a malformed voter code. Please check (or request) your voter code, and recast your vote.

Valete,

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Pius
Diribitor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33777 From: mlcinnyc Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: a.d. VIII Kal. Mar.
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Today is ante diem VIII Kalendas Martias; the day is Comitialis.

"Multi famam, conscientiam pauci verentur." (Many fear their
reputation, few their conscience) - Pliny

It is a day known as the Caristia, or Cara Cognatio, and involved
offerings to the family lares and a shared family meal. The emphasis
turns from the spirits of family members who are dead, to family
members still alive.

"Higgledy-Piggledy
Cara Cognatio,
Time to renew all the
Family ties,
Followed Feralia,
Post-Parentalia,
Patched up old quarrels and
Little white lies." - Anon.

In Facta et dicta memorabilia, Valerius Maximus recounts the story of
Pero, a young woman who nursed her father, Cimon, imprisoned and
condemned to starvation. Her devotion persuades the authorities to
release her father, and thus she saves his life. Valerius goes on to
describe the strong impact made by a painting depicting the theme:

"People stop in amazement and cannot take their eyes off the
scene ... In those mute figures they feel they are looking on real and
living bodies. This must be the effect on the mind too when the still
more effective picture made by words prompts it to recall events of
old as though they had just happened." (Valerius Maximus, Facta et
dicta memorabilia V.iv. ext. 1.6)

The story of Pero's devotion to her father, often called Caritas
Romana, was popular in ancient Roman art, while depictions of the
scene in medieval art are extremely rare. In the Renaissance, and
mainly in the Baroque, artists exhibited renewed interest in the pagan
story, which is manifested in a large number of works. After the
eighteenth century the number of works portraying this theme
diminished considerably.

The prevalent iconography of Caritas Romana features Pero with a bare
breast, nursing her imprisoned father. The classical writers and the
visual images from various periods, particularly those accompanied by
a text, were emphatic as to the moral significance of the theme; at
the same time, it obviously embodied an erotic potential as well. One
may assume that the patrons and artists were well-aware of this
duality and the possibility of highlighting either aspect, in keeping
with the circumstances.

In the Roman period the theme of Caritas Romana was portrayed in
numerous frescoes and terracotta paintings. The popularity of the
theme during this period may be accounted for by a mural from Pompeii,
whose physical condition unfortunately is quite bad. The episode takes
place in a closed dark space, possibly a prison, according to the
barred window in the top right-hand corner. A ray of light penetrates
through this window, illuminating the only two figures in the room.
Cimon kneels on the ground before Pero who is seated in frontal
position, softly looking at her father. She holds out her breast,
directing it towards his mouth, and he suckles. The moral lesson of
the theme in the Pompeii paintings is elucidated by an accompanying
inscription presenting it as an "example of virtue" (exemplum
virtutis).

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33778 From: Reccanello Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Legião XXIV
O que é a Legião XXIV????

[]s
C. ARMINIVS RECCANELVS
"Quidquid latine dictum sit, alturn viditur."

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33779 From: Emilia Curia Finnica Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: family!
Salvete omnes,

I and C. Curius Saturninus have become mater and pater familias, as our
little son M. Curius Saturninus Alexander was born on Monday 14th.
Sincere thanks to all our friends who have already congratulated us and
praise to Ianus, Saturnus, Liber and Libera, Venus, Diana, Hercules and
Iuno Lucina, Opis, Vaticanus, Levana, Cunina, Rumina, Intercidona,
Pilumnus and Deverra, all Lares and Latona. Tomorrow we'll be
celebrating dies lustricus!

Valete optime,

Emilia Curia Finnica
Scriba Araniae Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
Senatrix
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33780 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: family!
Emilia Curia Finnica wrote:
> I and C. Curius Saturninus have become mater and pater familias, as
> our little son M. Curius Saturninus Alexander was born on Monday 14th.

Salvete, Emilia Curia Finnica et Cai Curi Saturnine.

Congratulations! May your first-born enjoy a long and healthy life, and
not put too many gray hairs on his parents' heads.

Valete, Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33781 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: family!
Salve Emilia Curia!

Emilia Curia Finnica <e.curia@...> writes:

> I and C. Curius Saturninus have become mater and pater familias, as our
> little son M. Curius Saturninus Alexander was born on Monday 14th.

Congratulations to you both! May your son grow up to be as fine a person as
his two excellent parents.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33782 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: family!
Congratulations! All great feelings on just a word!

Valete bene in pacem deorum,
L. Arminius Faustus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Emilia Curia Finnica <e.curia@w...>
wrote:
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I and C. Curius Saturninus have become mater and pater familias, as
our
> little son M. Curius Saturninus Alexander was born on Monday 14th.
> Sincere thanks to all our friends who have already congratulated us
and
> praise to Ianus, Saturnus, Liber and Libera, Venus, Diana, Hercules
and
> Iuno Lucina, Opis, Vaticanus, Levana, Cunina, Rumina, Intercidona,
> Pilumnus and Deverra, all Lares and Latona. Tomorrow we'll be
> celebrating dies lustricus!
>
> Valete optime,
>
> Emilia Curia Finnica
> Scriba Araniae Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
> Senatrix
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33783 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: family!
Salvete Amici!

Congratulations! I hope to be able to go to Finland soon to see
Marcus Saturninus. ;-)


>Salvete omnes,
>
>I and C. Curius Saturninus have become mater and pater familias, as our
>little son M. Curius Saturninus Alexander was born on Monday 14th.
>Sincere thanks to all our friends who have already congratulated us and
>praise to Ianus, Saturnus, Liber and Libera, Venus, Diana, Hercules and
>Iuno Lucina, Opis, Vaticanus, Levana, Cunina, Rumina, Intercidona,
>Pilumnus and Deverra, all Lares and Latona. Tomorrow we'll be
>celebrating dies lustricus!
>
>Valete optime,
>
>Emilia Curia Finnica
>Scriba Araniae Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
>Senatrix

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Proconsul Thules
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of Roman Times Quartely
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33784 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: family!
Salvete and Congratulations to you both and welcome M. Curi
Saturninr Alexander.

Valete,

G. Popillius Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33785 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: Legião XXIV
Flavia Tullia Caio Arminio Reccanelo quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
omnibus S.P.D.



>
> O que é a Legião XXIV????

Puto haec significare 'ubi est Legio XXIV,' sed vertenda vel in Latinum
vel in Anglicum ut nos omnes ea legere possint.

I think this says, 'where is Legio XXIV,' but it should be translated
into Latin or English so that the rest of us could read it.

Respondeo legionem XXIVam prope urbem Philadelphiam in Civitatibus
Foederatis Americae praetorium habere.

I reply that Legio XXIV has its headquarters near Philadelphia in the
U.S.A.

Vale, et valete,

Flavia Tullia Scholastica
Socia Legionis Vicesimae et Quartae




> []s
> C. ARMINIVS RECCANELVS
> "Quidquid latine dictum sit, alturn viditur."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33786 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: Ruins may support tale of Rome's origin
Flavia Tullia Tiberio Galerio Paulino quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
omnibus S.P.D.

> Salve Romans
>
> FYI From the front page of the Washington Times
>
The Latin poem I posted here, which arrived just before this message,
refers to these very discoveries.

> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
Vale, et valete,

Flavia Tullia Scholastica


>
> Ruins may support tale of Rome's origin
>
>
> By Rachel Sanderson
> REUTERS NEWS AGENCY
>
>
> ROME -- Italian archaeologists digging in the Forum have unearthed the ruins
> of a palace they say confirms the legend of Rome's birth " a discovery that
> may force the rewriting of Western history.
>
>
> Most contemporary historians dismiss as fable the tale that Romulus founded
> Rome in 753 B.C. and built a walled city on the slopes of the Palatine hill
> where he and his twin brother, Remus, were suckled by a wolf in their infancy.
>
>
> Andrea Carandini of Rome's La Sapienza University has spent 20 years trying to
> prove the skeptics wrong and last month he and his team hit on the final piece
> of a puzzle he believes shows the myth has root in fact.
> "Archaeology and legend appear to go better together than contemporary
> historians thought," Mr. Carandini said in an interview before presentation of
> his findings this weekend.
>
>
> "We now have all the elements to show that part of the legend may very well be
> true."
> The source of Mr. Carandini's confidence is the discovery of traces of an 8th
> century B.C. house of regal proportions on the edge of the Forum that dates
> from the period of the Eternal City's legendary founding.
> Found 10 yards or so beneath pines growing on the surface of the Palatine and
> under centuries of construction from classical to Renaissance times, the
> palace had a courtyard and covered inner area spanning an estimated 3,800
> square feet.
> Wooden columns marked its entrances, ceramics decorated it and seats were
> located against the walls of a grand central hall.
> It is located by the Sanctuary of Vesta, the Roman goddess of the hearth,
> close to the slopes of the Palatine, the site of the earliest traces of Roman
> civilization and where legend has it Romulus killed Remus before building
> Rome.
> Most historians have always dismissed Rome's founding myth because they argued
> the Eternal City was just a huddle of wattle huts at the time Roman historian
> Livy described Romulus fortifying the Palatine and showing "outward symbols of
> power."
> Mr. Carandini, who has also found traces of sanctuaries, a defensive wall and
> a shingle Forum floor dating from the same period, said that view will now
> have to change.
>
>
> "It is exceptional, a find of maximum importance," he said. "It could only be
> a palace fit for a king." Scholars elsewhere, when asked for their reaction to
> the finds, tended to be more cautious.
> "The palace is completely convincing. In the 8th century B.C. people tended to
> live in tiny, sub-oval huts. This structure is much larger and rectangular.
> But this does not have a direct link to the Romulus myth," said Elizabeth
> Fentress, an archaeology research fellow at the British School in Rome.
> "The tradition is based on royalty and an orderly community, but that does not
> mean that Romulus killed Remus."
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33787 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: My congratulations and some special thanks
Salvete,

First my congratulations and best wishes to Emilia Curia Finnica and
C. Curius Saturninus on the birth of their son, M. Curius Saturninus
Alexander

I'd like to also take the time for a few special thank you's as well.

My most grateful thanks to Senator Marcus Arminius Maior for taking
the initiative to update and send to me the files for 2004 and
2005's Annales of Nova Roma. I was very pleased and pleasantly
surprised when those files arrived as it saved me some work.

I'd also like to thank Manius Constantinus Serapio for his
invaluable help in translating the Censor's form letters into
Italian as well as his extreme patience with helping me to translate
the Nova Roma citizenship application into Italian.

A special thank you to Publius Rutilius Bardulus Hadrianus and
Marcus Adrianus Complutensis for their help in translating the
citizenship application and the Censor's form letters into Spanish.

Also a thank you to Flavia Tullia Valeria Scholastica for pointing
out that the ending date for voting in the Comitia Populi Tributa
was posted as XV February instead of XXV February. I'd like to brag
that it is how effecient things are that an election can be
concluded three days before it starts, but alas her eagle eye
spotted this typo. Her eagle eye also noticed that in the
Constitution the word "supersede" is misspelled "supercede" in
Article V.E. I've taken advantage of the powers provided me under
the Lex Equitia de Corrigendis Legum Erratis to correct this
spelling error.

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Magister Aranearius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33788 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: My congratulations and some special thanks
M. Hortensia Maior E. Curiae Finnicae spd;
Salvete and congratulations on the birth of a wonderful son
Marcus Curius Saturninus!
Valete
M. Hortensia Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33789 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: some special thanks
AVE OPTIME Q CASSI CALVE

> I'd also like to thank Manius Constantinus Serapio for his
> invaluable help in translating the Censor's form letters into
> Italian as well as his extreme patience with helping me to
translate
> the Nova Roma citizenship application into Italian.

No, >I< must thank you for publishing the application form in
Italian on the website! This will be a remarkable improvement in the
application process for Italians :-)

OPTIME VALE
M'C.Serapio
Propraetor Italiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33790 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: family!
AVE EMILIA CVRIA FINNICA

You can't imagine how happy I am!!! :-)
Congratulations!

OPTIME VALE
M'C.Serapio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33791 From: filipe Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Legião XXIV
Salve Omnes

Just helping !
The question is what is the legio XXIV and not Where.

Quintus Adrianus Probus
-----Mensagem original-----
De: Flavia Scholastica [mailto:fororom@...]
Enviada: terça-feira, 22 de Fevereiro de 2005 21:39
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Assunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Legião XXIV

Flavia Tullia Caio Arminio Reccanelo quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
omnibus S.P.D.



>
> O que é a Legião XXIV????

Puto haec significare 'ubi est Legio XXIV,' sed vertenda vel in
Latinum
vel in Anglicum ut nos omnes ea legere possint.

I think this says, 'where is Legio XXIV,' but it should be
translated
into Latin or English so that the rest of us could read it.

Respondeo legionem XXIVam prope urbem Philadelphiam in Civitatibus
Foederatis Americae praetorium habere.

I reply that Legio XXIV has its headquarters near Philadelphia in
the
U.S.A.

Vale, et valete,

Flavia Tullia Scholastica
Socia Legionis Vicesimae et Quartae




> []s
> C. ARMINIVS RECCANELVS
> "Quidquid latine dictum sit, alturn viditur."



_____

Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33792 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: family!
G. Equitius Cato familiae Curio Saturnino S.P.D.

Salvete!

May you receive the blessings of the Divine upon your house and your
son! Gaudete Romani! Da nobis filius est!

Valete optime,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Emilia Curia Finnica <e.curia@w...>
wrote:
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I and C. Curius Saturninus have become mater and pater familias, as our
> little son M. Curius Saturninus Alexander was born on Monday 14th.
> Sincere thanks to all our friends who have already congratulated us and
> praise to Ianus, Saturnus, Liber and Libera, Venus, Diana, Hercules and
> Iuno Lucina, Opis, Vaticanus, Levana, Cunina, Rumina, Intercidona,
> Pilumnus and Deverra, all Lares and Latona. Tomorrow we'll be
> celebrating dies lustricus!
>
> Valete optime,
>
> Emilia Curia Finnica
> Scriba Araniae Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
> Senatrix
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33793 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Re: Legião XXIV
>
Salve, Quinte Adriano Probo, et salvete, omnes quirites, socii,
peregrinique!

> Salve Omnes
>
> Just helping !
> The question is what is the legio XXIV and not Where.
>
Thank you/gratias!

> Quintus Adrianus Probus

It's a reenactment legion, one of several in this country, and one of
the largest and most authentic ones. It has vexillationes (units, so to
speak) in several geographic areas, but the commander lives near
Philadelphia, so that's where its headquarters is.

Vale, et valete,

Flavia Tullia

> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: Flavia Scholastica [mailto:fororom@...]
> Enviada: terça-feira, 22 de Fevereiro de 2005 21:39
> Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Assunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Legião XXIV
>
> Flavia Tullia Caio Arminio Reccanelo quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
> omnibus S.P.D.
>
>
>
>>
>> O que é a Legião XXIV????
>
> Puto haec significare 'ubi est Legio XXIV,' sed vertenda vel in
> Latinum
> vel in Anglicum ut nos omnes ea legere possint.
>
> I think this says, 'where is Legio XXIV,' but it should be
> translated
> into Latin or English so that the rest of us could read it.
>
> Respondeo legionem XXIVam prope urbem Philadelphiam in Civitatibus
> Foederatis Americae praetorium habere.
>
> I reply that Legio XXIV has its headquarters near Philadelphia in
> the
> U.S.A.
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> Flavia Tullia Scholastica
> Socia Legionis Vicesimae et Quartae
>
>
>
>
>> []s
>> C. ARMINIVS RECCANELVS
>> "Quidquid latine dictum sit, alturn viditur."
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33794 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-02-22
Subject: Mosaics Of Zeugma
Salvete omnes,

I got this courtesy of a member of thr IR2 list. It is a good site
about a Roman town, Zeugma in present day Turkey where some of the
most beautiful and technically well done mosaics have been
discovered. The archeologists were in one hell of a rat race to
preserve and save these treasures since a dam was to or has by now
flooded the entire area. There was a good program to TV a year ago on
this subject. Meanwhile take a gander at this interesting site and
you will see what I'm talking about! Enjoy and I'll post this in the
Muses sodalista as well.


http://www.zeugmaweb.com/zeugma/english/engindex.htm


Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33795 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Voting on the Resignation Law - just say NO!
G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

My own views on resignation, like those of my fellow quaestor Galerius
Paulinus', need no re-hashing here. But we are faced with a much
greater danger in casting our votes right now. The laws currently
under consideration in the cista are terribly ill-conceived and
violate two essential and utterly Roman precepts: that the power of a
magistracy comes from the People, and that no one individual may
choose with whom they share that power.

The potestas and imperium that come with a magistracy are gifts from
the People to their fellow citizens when they vote them into office.
The People are the only legitimate source of those awesome gifts. The
lictors, the purple stripe, the curule chair are all fine trappings
and an impressive public show, but they mean nothing if the People
have not given their consent by an act of their free will: the vote.
To allow any other path to magisterial power is a blatant offense to
our romanitas. Vox populi vox dei.

The idea that any magistrate who resigns may be able to return if his
colleagues and the Censors will "allow" it patently absurd. In the
case of a citizen assuming (or re-assuming) a magistracy, the only
opinion that matters is that of the People speaking through the cista,
no matter how highly-regarded the citizen in question is, or how
heartfelt his desire to return to office; the only entity which may
"allow" a citizen to assume a magistracy under ANY circumstances is,
and should always be, the People. The People are greater than any
magistrate.

"The consul [Publius Valerius] felt hurt at finding these rumours so
widely believed, and summoned the people to an assembly. As he entered
the 'fasces' were lowered, to the great delight of the multitude, who
understood that it was to them that they were lowered as an open
avowal that the dignity and might of the people were greater than
those of the consul." - Livy, History of Rome 2.7

Finally, there is a reason that Roman magistracies came in pairs. We
often see two politicians from very different backgrounds and with
very different ideas sharing an office, and that is precisely the
point: no-one may choose with whom they share their office. Once
again, it is the People, and ONLY the People, who confer legitimacy
upon a magistrate, and they do so at their own sufferance. If this
law passes, it is a single, strong step in usurping the power and
dignity that belongs by right only to the People.

I am not a Pleb so I hesitate to comment on the undulating morass that
calls itself the lex Minia de aedilibus plebis. But I must say I
think it excruciatingly bloated and unnecessary.

I urge all of you, my fellow citizens, to reject these laws. We can
do better. We MUST do better, to preserve our rights as citizens of
Nova Roma.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33797 From: lucius_vitellius_triarius Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Salvete,

First, let me say that I am a newbie to Nova Roma, and I have a bad
habit of speaking my mind on occasion, so any seasoned critics may
take this post with a grain of salt or not.

Could this whole Paterfamilias/Materfamilias issue be somewhat
simplified by a replacement of the old Gens Pater/Mater designation
with a new designation of First Citizen of Gens XYZ. This would
allow for recognition of those citizens who changed world history by
helping create and begin the gens system of Nova Roma-The New Rome,
not unlike Octavian (First Citizen of Rome) changed world history in
the annals of Old Rome. It could be kinda like a "Charter Member"
sticker for your micronational RV.

This, to me, and I may be wrong, would not change the new rules on
Paters/Maters, however, it would provide an historical reference and
point of contact for new citizens, should they have any questions on
how to get started helping rebuild Rome, i.e., past the abridged New
Citizen Page.

I don't know...they probably didn't have such a designation and there
is probably no historical justification for such a title in old Rome,
but...they didn't have electric lights, pdf scrolls, eTabulariums,
computers, webpages, newgroups and emails either...so, something new
would not necessarily be a bad thing in the running of a nation.

(topic switch)

Also, I have been observing the posts and have noticed that there
have been several addresses to the subject of being, let's say, "not
so nice" with posts...followed by some recommendations that "people
be nice to new people." As Kaiser Wilhelm remarked (as I butcher his
quote):

"The process of the Legislature is a lot like slaughtering a hog.
There's a lot of blood, a lot of fat, and most people couldn't
stomach actually seeing the process done..."

thus,

Heated Politics + Controversial Pagan Religion Topics + Scholarly
Essays in a Language Most People Avoided in School + Valid Arguments
+ Invalid Arguments + Humor + Offense + Defense + monumental visions
+ stupid questions (YES, THERE ARE STUPID QUESTIONS) = Nova Roma!!!

It would truly be so sad, and I, as a new citizen, would really not
be interested, if the normal and acceptable response to posts would
be, "yeah, that's great" or "uh-huh" or "whatever."

Keep up the good work of bickering, fighting amongst ourselves,
attacking and defending postions, speaking our minds...that is what
makes it all work! Historically, Rome was the King of Civil Wars!

Valete,
You Can Start Shooting At Me Now,

Lucius Vitellius Triarius
Provisional Civis
America Austrorientalis
No Tribe Yet
No Century Points Yet
No Voter Code Yet
...but happy and content



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "quintuscassiuscalvus"
<richmal@c...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
> <christer.edling@t...> wrote:
> > Salve Honorable C. Albius Gadelicus!
> >
> > I am happy to se that You have got answers and hope this will be
> good enough.
> >
> > I also have to admit that the offices of Magister Aranearius and
> > Censores will have much to do before the present data base is
> changed
> > to mirror the recent changes in the family laws even remotely. In
> the
> > end I am sure that the data base must be re-built from bottom up
> > before we can be fully satisfied.
>
> Salve,
>
> As the Magister Aranearius I've done a few temporary work arounds
> such as disable the emailing of "maters and paters" that they have
> applicants awaiting approval as those are now basically spam,
> disabled the mater/pater approval tools, and some modifications to
> the album gentium and civium to at least semi-reflect the way
things
> are now "on paper."
>
> However, there is a long way to go and there are many other issues
> within the database that need to be addressed and addressed once
and
> for all. I concur with Caeso Fabius Quintilianus that it needs to
> be rebuilt from scratch. Whether I and a team of dedicated
> volunteers do it or Nova Roma has to hire a professional web
> database design firm to do it remains to be seen as right now I've
> only begun to scratch the surface.
>
> However there is some good news on the website front:
>
> Thanks to the help of P. Rutilius Bardulus Hadrianus the
> transcribing of the Citizenship application into Spanish is nearing
> completion. Just a few more things need to be translated and it
> will be ready to go live.
>
> Vale,
>
> Q. Cassius Calvus
> Magister Aranearius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33798 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Tax payments info.
Salve Romans

Could the following citizen drop me a private note with the requested information. I am maintaining a spreadsheet with tax payment for this year and some information was left off your payments. Citizen # 1777 (DD) could you please send me your Roman name and Province.

all others

If you have paid you taxes between Jan 1 and February 22 could you also drop me a private note with your Roman, Macro and Provencal name as some of this information was not included in your payment.

Could all Citizens who are going to pay your taxes soon please include your Roman and Macro national name and your Province as well.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Consular Quaestor









[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33799 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Familiae Novae Romae
Salve Luci Vitelli,

lucius_vitellius_triarius wrote:

> Could this whole Paterfamilias/Materfamilias issue be somewhat
> simplified by a replacement of the old Gens Pater/Mater designation
> with a new designation of First Citizen of Gens XYZ.

The idea was considered but rejected due to its ahistorical character.
Gentes in Roma Antiqua had no such person, and there's really no
guarantee that the person who came here first and first used the nomen
would be especially exemplary.

> I don't know...they probably didn't have such a designation and there
> is probably no historical justification for such a title in old Rome,
> but...they didn't have electric lights, pdf scrolls, eTabulariums,
> computers, webpages, newgroups and emails either...so, something new
> would not necessarily be a bad thing in the running of a nation.

Unlike all the things you mention above, such designations would serve
no functional purpose.


> Also, I have been observing the posts and have noticed that there
> have been several addresses to the subject of being, let's say, "not
> so nice" with posts...followed by some recommendations that "people
> be nice to new people."

It's actually a good practice to be polite to all people. This group of
people, unlike the people of Roma Antiqua, is made up of a very
heterogeneous mixture coming from many cultures. Good manners being the
lubricant of social interactions, it requires more lubricant for such a
heterogeneous combination to function well.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33800 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Lingua::Romana::Perligata
Salvete Quirites,

For the ultimate Latin computer geek:

The Lingua::Romana::Perligata makes it makes it possible to write Perl
programs in Latin. (If you have to ask "Why?", then the answer probably
won't make any sense to you either.)

http://tinyurl.com/33tb6

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33801 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Citizenship approvals - again
Salve

I'm still waiting to see published the approvals of citizenships made by the
Censors. Being citizenship's approval now an act of a magistrate of Nova Roma,
they shall be subjected to the same scrutiny by the Tribunes as any other act
of any magistrate.

Once again, as a Tribunus, I expect to see published in some form any approval
made by the moment the new law entered in force.

Should those acts of magistrate of Nova Roma be made available to be checked, I
shall see myself forced to veto any call of the comitia where possibly
irregular citizens might be allowed to vote.

valete,

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33802 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Report of las Senate session - delayed
Salve

It was requested on this list the last Senate's meeting report. Undoubtly, we
tribunes are late in publishing it. Supposedly, Tribununs Saturninus had taken
upon himself to present the report but, obviously, he had some rl event
preventing him to :) (Heartfelt congratulations, btw).

I shall try to get to it within tomorrow, should not any of my collegues precede
me.

Valete

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33803 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Gentes and familiae
Salve

On the matter of gentes and familiae, I announce you that is my firm intention
to propose, within next month, a lex to the comitia to revise the present law
and partially bring back the old system (even if I can forecast already the
yells and turmoil it will cause).

To the very least, it is my intention to do in a way that the name of the gentes
currently in Nova Roma will be closed for future applicants. I strongly feel
the fact that the founders of those gentes within Nova Roma and who have put
their efforts in them, sometimes for years, have given no space to see who can
bring their name or not as maybe historical but profoundly unfair and unjust.

And even for the historicity I'd have some doubt: I have serious doubts the
Censores would had given the first former-barbarian moving in town tha name of
a patrician family or of an anyway preminent gens in Rome.

I'd suggest the ones dealing with the website to wait a moment before
eradicating the present database and scripts.. who knows, they might come to be
handy again.


Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33804 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Salvete Quirites, et salve Domiti Constantine,

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus wrote:

> I'm still waiting to see published the approvals of citizenships made by the
> Censors.

I didn't know you were waiting for them. I remind you that messages
posted to this mailing list do not constitute official correspondence
with the Censors. Did you ever write to either my colleague or I about
this?

> Being citizenship's approval now an act of a magistrate of Nova Roma,
> they shall be subjected to the same scrutiny by the Tribunes as any other act
> of any magistrate.

My past experience as a magistrate has been that a citizen who objected
to an action of mine could appeal to a tribune, but I had no requirement
to report every one of my actions to the tribunes for their prior
approval. I think you're interpreting your authority a bit too broadly
here.

> Once again, as a Tribunus, I expect to see published in some form any approval
> made by the moment the new law entered in force.

My colleague and his scribes have been handling citizenship applications
since the beginning of the year, and will continue to do so until later
this year, at which point I will be taking over. I've forwarded him an
informational copy of your post. Still, I recommend that you write to
him (and me) personally if you are making an official demand.

> Should those acts of magistrate of Nova Roma be made available to be checked, I
> shall see myself forced to veto any call of the comitia where possibly
> irregular citizens might be allowed to vote.

And I shall ask the other tribunes to override your veto. It's not up
to you to decide who is and is not an 'irregular' citizen. That
judgement comes under our sanctitas, not yours.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33805 From: Jack the Ripper Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Rif: [Nova-Roma] family!
Salvete, Emilia Curia Finnica et Cai Curi Saturnine.
Congratulations for the baby.


Valete Optime,

Qvintvs Fabivs Allectvs (aka Alecto)
Pater Familias Fabiae Alectae
Civis NovaRomanus Italicus - http://italia.novaroma.org
Tirone Legio I Italica - Villadose (RO) - http://www.legio-i-italica.it
Cogito, ergo sum - http://jacktheripper1984.splinder.com


-------Messaggio originale-------

Da: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Data: 02/22/05 16:08:17
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] family!

Salvete omnes,

I and C. Curius Saturninus have become mater and pater familias, as our
little son M. Curius Saturninus Alexander was born on Monday 14th.
Sincere thanks to all our friends who have already congratulated us and
praise to Ianus, Saturnus, Liber and Libera, Venus, Diana, Hercules and
Iuno Lucina, Opis, Vaticanus, Levana, Cunina, Rumina, Intercidona,
Pilumnus and Deverra, all Lares and Latona. Tomorrow we'll be
celebrating dies lustricus!

Valete optime,

Emilia Curia Finnica
Scriba Araniae Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
Senatrix


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

Get unlimited calls to
U.S./Canada




Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33806 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Gentes and familiae
Salve Tribune Domiti Constantine Fusce,

At this particular stage I have to admit that I have mixed feelings
on the matter of gentes and familiae. I understand the work, research
and time it takes to build a family and the importance and respect
that was given to the gens head to say yes or no to an applicant.
On the other hand,in the past, various gens heads sat in limbo and
did not do their jobs which gave a bad impression to new citizens
coming into NR. Some like me waited two months without the courtesy
of a reply and then wrote to several other gens with the same result -
no replies. I know several people who waited too long when their
heart's desire was on a particular gens then gave up and left. I
questioned the fairness of a number of gens that had one or two
members and were "closed". If I remember correctly, the Censors had
no say or power to do anything about the situation and for this
reason I can see a possible improvement. Perhaps if the situation
regarding vanished or uninterested gens heads had been dealt with
earlier there may well have been far more opposition to the changes
coming into effect.


Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
<dom.con.fus@e...> wrote:
> Salve
>
> On the matter of gentes and familiae, I announce you that is my
firm intention
> to propose, within next month, a lex to the comitia to revise the
present law
> and partially bring back the old system (even if I can forecast
already the
> yells and turmoil it will cause).
>
> To the very least, it is my intention to do in a way that the name
of the gentes
> currently in Nova Roma will be closed for future applicants. I
strongly feel
> the fact that the founders of those gentes within Nova Roma and who
have put
> their efforts in them, sometimes for years, have given no space to
see who can
> bring their name or not as maybe historical but profoundly unfair
and unjust.
>
> And even for the historicity I'd have some doubt: I have serious
doubts the
> Censores would had given the first former-barbarian moving in town
tha name of
> a patrician family or of an anyway preminent gens in Rome.
>
> I'd suggest the ones dealing with the website to wait a moment
before
> eradicating the present database and scripts.. who knows, they
might come to be
> handy again.
>
>
> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
> Founder of Gens Constantinia
> Tribunus Plebis
> Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33807 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Esteemed Censor

In data Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:06:14 -0500, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@...> ha scritto:
> I didn't know you were waiting for them. I remind you that messages
> posted to this mailing list do not constitute official correspondence
> with the Censors. Did you ever write to either my colleague or I about
> this?

I appreciate your joy for formalities, I shall be sure to send you personal
copies of messages from now on, including this one, even if undoubtly you will
have already be able to read them on here. Do you want a special subject line
too? A specific font or indentation? I'm sorry I shall not be able to close it
with red wax and appose my signet on it, but as soon as it will be made
possible by electronic communications, I shall see to add it, to make it look
even more official and meet your favor.

> My past experience as a magistrate has been that a citizen who objected
> to an action of mine could appeal to a tribune, but I had no requirement
> to report every one of my actions to the tribunes for their prior
> approval. I think you're interpreting your authority a bit too broadly
> here.

I'm delighted to hear of your past experience as a magistrate, but I am forced
to remind you that Tribunes may, and actually often have to, act on their own
initiative rather than waiting for a civis to come to them.

Also, that the Contitution of Nova Roma says, as I'm sure you are well aware of,
that the Tribunes power and obligations include "To pronounce intercessio
(intercession; a veto) against the actions of any other magistrate (with the
exception of the dictator and the interrex), Senatus consulta, magisterial
edicta, religious decreta, and leges passed by the comitia when the spirit
and/or letter of this Constitution or legally-enacted edicta or decreta,
Senatus Consulta or leges are being violated thereby;".

Being that approving a citizenship request became the action of a magistrate,
you are definitifely bound to report it, so that the Trinunes may control the
regularity of it and, if so they see needed, pronounce their intercessio
against. I'm not interpreting my authority broadly, it's the authority itself
to be broad enough to cover ANY official action you may take within Nova Roma.
In order to see that your or your collegue's action of approval of a given
citizen has or has not violated any enacted edicta, decreta, Senatus Consulta
or Lex, we tribunes must indeed be put in a condition to check them... it's
mere logic.

> My colleague and his scribes have been handling citizenship applications
> since the beginning of the year, and will continue to do so until later
> this year, at which point I will be taking over. I've forwarded him an
> informational copy of your post. Still, I recommend that you write to
> him (and me) personally if you are making an official demand.

Very well. This mail is cced to you personally as thus, I hope, shall now be
considered official by you. You are hereby demanded.

>> Should those acts of magistrate of Nova Roma be made available to be
>> checked, I shall see myself forced to veto any call of the comitia where
possibly
>> irregular citizens might be allowed to vote.
>
> And I shall ask the other tribunes to override your veto. It's not up
> to you to decide who is and is not an 'irregular' citizen. That
> judgement comes under our sanctitas, not yours.

You are partially correct. It's under your sanctitas to see if someone may or
may not become a citizen, but it's under the Tribunes' Sanctitas to see that in
taking the action of granting the citizenship you have applied the laws
correctly. It's our tribunician role and your actions as magistrate fall under
our scrutiny. It's as simple as that.

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33808 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Gentes and familiae
Salve Quintus Lanius Paulinus

> On the other hand,in the past, various gens heads sat in limbo and
> did not do their jobs which gave a bad impression to new citizens
> coming into NR. Some like me waited two months without the courtesy
> of a reply and then wrote to several other gens with the same result -
> no replies. I know several people who waited too long when their
> heart's desire was on a particular gens then gave up and left.


Yes, you are absolutely right on this one and I have taken this point in
consideration. The solution I'm leaning towards in the law I'm drafting is
actually something like an implict consensus to a joining request after a
period of time.

Basically, if within, say, 7 days of recieving the request of joining the
perspective member has not been given a yes or not answer, the Censor would be
entitled to take the silence of the "name-holder" as a yes. That, and the power
to Censores to take away "name ownership" (for a lack of a better term) from
the gens founder if the case of limboed members would be repeated as a constant
thing showing that the gens founder is neglecting its responsability. In that
case, the gens in question would become officially a free for all gens.

I think that would be a system simple to enact, fair to the Gens founder who
actually stay active and work on their own gens and guarantee at the same time
no limboed citizens.

Vale


Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33809 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Rif: [Nova-Roma] family!
> I and C. Curius Saturninus have become mater and
> pater familias, as our
> little son M. Curius Saturninus Alexander was born
> on Monday 14th.

Salve Saturninus,

I pray that the Goddess Venus blesses your new son! In
other words, I pray that he favors Emilia. :-))

Vale,
Diana




__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33810 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Tribunes & Citizenship approvals
M. Hortensia Maior D. Constantino Fusco spd;
Salve; as a tribune who has been toiling mightily over at the
Censors's Office, just wrestling with legal questions and not half as
hard as my fellow colleagues; Marcella, Amoricus, Calvus, Serapio,
COnservatus etc, I'd love to know where in Republican Rome tribunes
oversaw grants of citizenship? Please direct me.
M.Hortensia Maior TRP
Propraetrix Hiberniae
caput Officina Iuriis
et Investigatio CFQ





>
> Being that approving a citizenship request became the action of a
magistrate,
> you are definitifely bound to report it, so that the Trinunes may
control the
> regularity of it and, if so they see needed, pronounce their
intercessio
> against. I'm not interpreting my authority broadly, it's the
authority itself
> to be broad enough to cover ANY official action you may take within
Nova Roma.
> In order to see that your or your collegue's action of approval of
a given
> citizen has or has not violated any enacted edicta, decreta,
Senatus Consulta
> or Lex, we tribunes must indeed be put in a condition to check
them... it's
> mere logic.
>
> > My colleague and his scribes have been handling citizenship
applications
> > since the beginning of the year, and will continue to do so until
later
> > this year, at which point I will be taking over. I've forwarded
him an
> > informational copy of your post. Still, I recommend that you
write to
> > him (and me) personally if you are making an official demand.
>
> Very well. This mail is cced to you personally as thus, I hope,
shall now be
> considered official by you. You are hereby demanded.
>
> >> Should those acts of magistrate of Nova Roma be made available
to be
> >> checked, I shall see myself forced to veto any call of the
comitia where
> possibly
> >> irregular citizens might be allowed to vote.
> >
> > And I shall ask the other tribunes to override your veto. It's
not up
> > to you to decide who is and is not an 'irregular' citizen. That
> > judgement comes under our sanctitas, not yours.
>
> You are partially correct. It's under your sanctitas to see if
someone may or
> may not become a citizen, but it's under the Tribunes' Sanctitas to
see that in
> taking the action of granting the citizenship you have applied the
laws
> correctly. It's our tribunician role and your actions as magistrate
fall under
> our scrutiny. It's as simple as that.
>
> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
> Founder of Gens Constantinia
> Tribunus Plebis
> Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33811 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Tribunes & Citizenship approvals
Salve

In data Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:32:23 -0000, Maior <rory12001@...> ha
scritto:

> I'd love to know where in Republican Rome tribunes
> oversaw grants of citizenship? Please direct me.

*sighs*.. let's see if I can, once again, channel the message to you. Let's try
this way.. "I'd like to know where in republican Rome tribunes might be women".
They couldn't, of course. Now "where in Republican Rome tribunes oversaw grants
of citizenship?". They didn't, of course.

Then why you can be a tribune and why you and the rest of us tribunes have to
oversee the Censores's job? Because it is written in the Constitution of Nova
Roma that you can be and that we have to.

Live with it, the Constitution should come first to you (I know, it's a concept
apparently utterly alien to you, but anyway). It might be unfortunate, but the
Constitution says that you, and the rest of us tribunes, have to check any act
of any magistrate against the Constitution, laws, edicts and decreta of Nova
Roma to see if those acts have respected those documents and the fact the
Ancient Tribunes didn't do it counts absolutely nothing. Of course, in order to
be able to perform that duty, we must be presented those acts, which is all
what I'm asking for: for the tribunes to be put in a position to attend to
their duty.

Once again, you were elected Tribune, you were actually supposed to have stood
to be elected for it, to enact and defend the Constitutio and the normative
documents derived from it, not to enact your own private vision that the ways
of the ancients were better and therefore supersede the Constitutio whenever
you please or see fit.

If you feel you can't do your mandated job because you feel the Ancients's ways
were better, take the consequences of it and resign, but as long as you are in
the tribunician position, you are supposed to attend to *all* your tribune
duties as they are outlined in the Constitution (which, btw, include, if
necessary, vetoing the acts of "elected rapresentatives" if they go against the
constitution, laws, edicts and decreta.. something you already publicly
affirmed you'll never do, in my opinion implicitly adfirming you will
intentionally neglect at least part of your duties).

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33812 From: C. Fabia Livia Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Lingua::Romana::Perligata
> For the ultimate Latin computer geek:
>
> The Lingua::Romana::Perligata makes it makes it
> possible to write Perl
> programs in Latin. (If you have to ask "Why?", then
> the answer probably
> won't make any sense to you either.)
>
> http://tinyurl.com/33tb6

I love this, this is amazing! :)

Maybe we can re-code the NR website in Latin now...

Livia






___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33813 From: Numerius Gladius Bibulus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Lingua::Romana::Perligata
Salvete omnes,

> The Lingua::Romana::Perligata makes it makes it possible to write Perl
> programs in Latin. (If you have to ask "Why?", then the answer
> probably won't make any sense to you either.)

Interested cives might also be interested in a very brief writeup
published in the December 2004 copy of Aquila.

Valete,

Numerius Gladius Bibulus
Just Another Perligata Hacker
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33814 From: C. Fabia Livia Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
> I'm delighted to hear of your past experience as a
> magistrate, but I am forced
> to remind you that Tribunes may, and actually often
> have to, act on their own
> initiative rather than waiting for a civis to come
> to them.
>
> Also, that the Contitution of Nova Roma says, as I'm
> sure you are well aware of,
> that the Tribunes power and obligations include "To
> pronounce intercessio
> (intercession; a veto) against the actions of any
> other magistrate (with the
> exception of the dictator and the interrex), Senatus
> consulta, magisterial
> edicta, religious decreta, and leges passed by the
> comitia when the spirit
> and/or letter of this Constitution or
> legally-enacted edicta or decreta,
> Senatus Consulta or leges are being violated
> thereby;".
>
> Being that approving a citizenship request became
> the action of a magistrate,
> you are definitifely bound to report it, so that the
> Trinunes may control the
> regularity of it and, if so they see needed,
> pronounce their intercessio
> against. I'm not interpreting my authority broadly,
> it's the authority itself
> to be broad enough to cover ANY official action you
> may take within Nova Roma.
> In order to see that your or your collegue's action
> of approval of a given
> citizen has or has not violated any enacted edicta,
> decreta, Senatus Consulta
> or Lex, we tribunes must indeed be put in a
> condition to check them... it's
> mere logic.

The bit of the constitution which you quote doesn't at
any point say "all magistrates must report their every
action to the tribunes". And there are other ways for
you to become aware of things (for example, keeping
your eye on the website for any new citizens added -
in much the same way as you can watch this list for
edicts & other public actions).

If you want to take it upon yourself to examine every
approval of a new citizen, far be it from me to stop
you, but there's absolutely no need for you to make
extra work for the censors in the process.

Livia






___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33815 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Salve Fabia Livia

> The bit of the constitution which you quote doesn't at
> any point say "all magistrates must report their every
> action to the tribunes". And there are other ways for
> you to become aware of things (for example, keeping
> your eye on the website for any new citizens added -
> in much the same way as you can watch this list for
> edicts & other public actions).
>
> If you want to take it upon yourself to examine every
> approval of a new citizen, far be it from me to stop
> you, but there's absolutely no need for you to make
> extra work for the censors in the process.


And that is, I'm afraid to say, illogical. By looking at the website the
tribunes might see, with an immensly larger effort than a simple forward of
emails from the censores would require, who has been granted citizenship, but
the tribunes couldn't check who has been denied citizenship and if it was done
so correctly following the laws, or if the ones who were granted citizenships
were done so following the laws.

Also, I hope you shall convene with me, it is highly doubtful that any decision
of a magistrate might become in any way effective if it is not made public.

If you agree, as I hope you do, with the principle that the Tribunes have the
right and duty to veto any official action of a magistrate if it is against the
Constitution and so on, it logically comes from it that the Tribunes must be
placed in a position to know of that action.

Really, I do not understand where this hostility comes from, we are all (well,
with one exception or two, maybe) trying to do our work fully and at our best.

Vale

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33816 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Salve Domiti Constantine,

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus wrote:

> I appreciate your joy for formalities,

It's not a matter of formality, it's one of practicality.

> I shall be sure to send you personal
> copies of messages from now on, including this one, even if undoubtly you will
> have already be able to read them on here.

Only if they involve something that is specific to my own official
duties would such copies be necessary. The fact is that the Yahoo
remailer is unreliable, and there is no guarantee that something posted
to the mailing list will reach me.

> Do you want a special subject line
> too? A specific font or indentation? I'm sorry I shall not be able to close it
> with red wax and appose my signet on it, but as soon as it will be made
> possible by electronic communications, I shall see to add it, to make it look
> even more official and meet your favor.

I'd offer you a bowl of cream for your cattiness, but it wouldn't attach
to the e-mail.

> I'm delighted to hear of your past experience as a magistrate, but I am forced
> to remind you that Tribunes may, and actually often have to, act on their own
> initiative rather than waiting for a civis to come to them.

So are you suggesting that when the Aediles deal with a market dispute
they ought to send a copy of their decision to the tribunes? Or when a
praetor admonishes a person for violations of the posting guidelines?

> Also, that the Contitution of Nova Roma says, as I'm sure you are well aware of,
> that the Tribunes power and obligations include "To pronounce intercessio
> (intercession; a veto) against the actions of any other magistrate (with the
> exception of the dictator and the interrex), Senatus consulta, magisterial
> edicta, religious decreta, and leges passed by the comitia when the spirit
> and/or letter of this Constitution or legally-enacted edicta or decreta,
> Senatus Consulta or leges are being violated thereby;".

Yes, I'm well aware of that provision of the law.

> Being that approving a citizenship request became the action of a magistrate,
> you are definitifely bound to report it,

No, Tribune, I am not bound to report my actions to you. There is no
such reporting requirement in our laws.

> so that the Trinunes may control the
> regularity of it and, if so they see needed, pronounce their intercessio
> against.

And what, exactly, could possibly be contained in a citizenship approval
that would warrant Tribunician intercessio?

> I'm not interpreting my authority broadly, it's the authority itself
> to be broad enough to cover ANY official action you may take within Nova Roma.
> In order to see that your or your collegue's action of approval of a given
> citizen has or has not violated any enacted edicta, decreta, Senatus Consulta
> or Lex, we tribunes must indeed be put in a condition to check them... it's
> mere logic.

Again, I ask you, what could you possibly find in a citizenship approval
that would warrant your intercessio?

>>My colleague and his scribes have been handling citizenship applications
>>since the beginning of the year, and will continue to do so until later
>>this year, at which point I will be taking over. I've forwarded him an
>>informational copy of your post. Still, I recommend that you write to
>>him (and me) personally if you are making an official demand.
>
>
> Very well. This mail is cced to you personally as thus, I hope, shall now be
> considered official by you. You are hereby demanded.

When I get to the point of approving citizenship applications, I shall
make sure that the approvals are cc'd to the tribunes@...
mailing list.

I also recommend that you familiarize yourself with the provisions of
the Lex Equitia de Vigintisexviris, concerning the functional role of
the Rogators after 1 January of this year.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33817 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Salve,

" The bit of the constitution which you quote doesn't at
> any point say "all magistrates must report their every
> action to the tribunes". And there are other ways for
> you to become aware of things (for example, keeping
> your eye on the website for any new citizens added -
> in much the same way as you can watch this list for
> edicts & other public actions)."

I´d like to take a tangential subject on this about the ´power´ of
the magistrate on acting. There is three ´powers´ that allows a
magistrate to act:

I - Potestas, ie, Power. All magistrates have ´potestas´ to do their
job, and act inside its duties.

II - Imperium. Imperium is a bigger potestas, but allow the
magistrate to intervene outside his duties, ie, on everything. The
Imperium may have geographic boundaries, we call this a ´provincia´,
and its a caracteristic on a governor, a ´pro-something´. Take a look
on Lex Arminia Equitia de Imperio for more information.

III - Tribunicia Potestas. A special case of potestas granted to the
Tribunes, it allows some special caracteristics, like vetos. However,
on NR the veto is not the same of the Ancient. It is necessary to
recall specific NR legislation on each case. It is very important to
notice that Tribunicia Potestas is different of Sainctitas.
Sainctitas originally is a religious term, adopted on the code of
magistrature, that is operationally oposed to the ´curulis
dignitatis´. The magistrate possessing Sainctitas is unchargeable,
the tribunes and plebeian aediles have it (due to the absence of
gentilic auspices on the plebeian families, that early on the
Republic prevented the plebeians to reach the curulis dignitatis,
that demanded private auspices, only the patricians had private
auspices)

And an Edictum? What is an edictum?

Edictum is just a written order of a magistrate, under any of the
power above.

A magistrate can work on its Potestas/Imperium/ T. Potestas without
edictum, and their acting will be as valid as with an edictum
(callings of the Comitia for exemple, arent done by edictum, just by
´voice order´). We recomend that on bigger cases, however, there is
an edictum to the ´files´.

---

Alas, allow me to public congratulate the censores by their work for
NR.

I see no wrong on their acting, and both Quintilianus and Marinus are
exemples to all of us follow.

L. Arminius Faustus PR




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C. Fabia Livia"
<c_fabia_livia@y...> wrote:
> > I'm delighted to hear of your past experience as a
> > magistrate, but I am forced
> > to remind you that Tribunes may, and actually often
> > have to, act on their own
> > initiative rather than waiting for a civis to come
> > to them.
> >
> > Also, that the Contitution of Nova Roma says, as I'm
> > sure you are well aware of,
> > that the Tribunes power and obligations include "To
> > pronounce intercessio
> > (intercession; a veto) against the actions of any
> > other magistrate (with the
> > exception of the dictator and the interrex), Senatus
> > consulta, magisterial
> > edicta, religious decreta, and leges passed by the
> > comitia when the spirit
> > and/or letter of this Constitution or
> > legally-enacted edicta or decreta,
> > Senatus Consulta or leges are being violated
> > thereby;".
> >
> > Being that approving a citizenship request became
> > the action of a magistrate,
> > you are definitifely bound to report it, so that the
> > Trinunes may control the
> > regularity of it and, if so they see needed,
> > pronounce their intercessio
> > against. I'm not interpreting my authority broadly,
> > it's the authority itself
> > to be broad enough to cover ANY official action you
> > may take within Nova Roma.
> > In order to see that your or your collegue's action
> > of approval of a given
> > citizen has or has not violated any enacted edicta,
> > decreta, Senatus Consulta
> > or Lex, we tribunes must indeed be put in a
> > condition to check them... it's
> > mere logic.
>
> The bit of the constitution which you quote doesn't at
> any point say "all magistrates must report their every
> action to the tribunes". And there are other ways for
> you to become aware of things (for example, keeping
> your eye on the website for any new citizens added -
> in much the same way as you can watch this list for
> edicts & other public actions).
>
> If you want to take it upon yourself to examine every
> approval of a new citizen, far be it from me to stop
> you, but there's absolutely no need for you to make
> extra work for the censors in the process.
>
> Livia
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33818 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Salve

In data Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:12:04 -0500, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@...> ha scritto:

> So are you suggesting that when the Aediles deal with a market dispute
> they ought to send a copy of their decision to the tribunes? Or when a
> praetor admonishes a person for violations of the posting guidelines?

As a matter of fact and as a general principle, yes.

but that is, obviously, close to impossible, even within a small world as Nova
Roma, despite the immense good will that a Tribunus can put in his work (which
happens, also, to be at times intentionally obstacolated by others, but that's
life I guess).

Then what can a tribunus do? As I see it, he can operate a distinguish. Some
actions of a magistrate have a direct impact on a given subject. It is easy to
guess that if the subject of the action has reasons to believe his rights have
been violated, he will go to inform teh Tribunes of the case and therefore teh
Tribunes will know about it. Quite not surprisingly, both your examples fall in
this category.

Then there is a series of actions of a magistrate that have not a direct impact
on a given citizen, but indirectly affect the whole citizenry. In such cases, I
believe Tribunes must act in a way to be informed of what is going on in order
to, if necessary, exercise their right and attend to the duties the
Constitution assigns to them. In this case, I see no other way to be able to
face my obligations than asking what I asked.

At least, should someone one day ask us why we didn't do our job of checking the
actions of the other magistrates, we'll be able to say, at least in this case,
that we tried but were not put in the position to.


>> Also, that the Contitution of Nova Roma says, as I'm sure you are well
>> aware of, that the Tribunes power and obligations include "To pronounce
>> intercessio (intercession; a veto) against the actions of any other
>> magistrate (with the exception of the dictator and the interrex), Senatus
>> consulta, magisterial edicta, religious decreta, and leges passed by the
>> comitia when the spirit and/or letter of this Constitution or
legally-enacted
>> edicta or decreta, Senatus Consulta or leges are being violated thereby;".
>
> Yes, I'm well aware of that provision of the law.
>
> (skip)
>
> No, Tribune, I am not bound to report my actions to you. There is no
> such reporting requirement in our laws.

Well, what can I say. I'm glad you are aware of our tribunician duty to act on
*any* act of a magistrate. I'm wondering, given you do not think you have a
duty to report your actions, how you suppose the Tribunes may attend to that
duty.

I'm of the idea that the actions of a magistrate must be made, if not public,
at
least accessible to the ones who are supposed to control them. That, again, if
the Tribunes have to have a way to effectively perform the duties assigned to
them by the Constitutio.

Lacking that, in all conscience, I feel I have to at least prevent the effects
of the actions I am unable to determine if they have been taken following the
spirit and the letter of the Constititio, which is precisely which I intend to
do, if necessary. The others tribunes, of course, might think otherwise and
accept the fact there are some actions of teh magistrates of Nova Roma that,
altho abstractly falling under their duty to scrutinize, they cannot have
access to due teh will of the acting magistrate and do nothing. It's their
right and priviledge.


>> so that the Trinunes may control the
>> regularity of it and, if so they see needed, pronounce their intercessio
>> against.
>
> And what, exactly, could possibly be contained in a citizenship approval
> that would warrant Tribunician intercessio?

I can not know, as long as the Tribunes are not put in a position to check the
approval (or denial) and the process that led to it. And you are preventing
that.

vale

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33819 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
M. Hortensia Maior L. Arminio Fausto spd;
Salvete; may I say I entirely agree with Praetor and former
Tribune Faustus, not only in his reasoning but also in our common
respect for our Censors and their very hard work on behalf of Nova
Roma.
Finally, having women in posts is not equivalent to re-engineering
Nova Roma to resemble a micro-mangaged European Union, which it
appears is Fuscus's wish. Which is why I opposed establishing a NR
supreme court.
Omnes the tribunes traditional duty is to protect the rights of
the plebs and prevent encroachments on their power, and to make laws.
We must do this with prudence and wisdom.
bene valete
M. Hortensia Maior TRP



> Alas, allow me to public congratulate the censores by their work
for
> NR.
>
> I see no wrong on their acting, and both Quintilianus and Marinus
are
> exemples to all of us follow.
>
> L. Arminius Faustus PR
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33820 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Salve

In data Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:17:27 -0000, Lucius Arminius Faustus
<lafaustus@...> ha scritto:

> Alas, allow me to public congratulate the censores by their work for
> NR.
>
> I see no wrong on their acting, and both Quintilianus and Marinus are
> exemples to all of us follow.


What Faustus said here made me believe I was, peraphs, misunderstood.

I'd like to make clear that I'm not saying the Censores have done something
wrong, I'm actually generally sure they (and the people who work with them in a
pretty commendable way) have done everything in an absolutely correct way
regarding their duties and obligations, but that, as a matter of principle, the
Tribunes must be able to check on their actions in order to attend to their own
obligations.

If I have exceeded in my tones, it might have been for the feeling of having, at
first, been ignored the first time I requested something that I see simply as
necessary to do my own job and afterwards pointlessly adversed for what I
percieve a mistaken sense of being able to do as one please despite the
Constitutio.

Now, if I did offend someone for the way I wrote what I did I'm up to offer an
apologize, but that doesn't change the fact that I feel the principle that the
Tribunes must be able to check on the actions of the magistrate of Nova Roma as
both required by the Constitutio and essential for them to be able to perform
their own obligations and I can't but act consequently to have that principle
respected.

Vale

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33821 From: Maior Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Salvete Quirites;
so now because of one Tribune with delusions of power, we would
have all citizenship applications overlooked by the Tribunes and
every single act of a magistrate scrutinized.

Quirites, what does this have to do with the ways of Republican
Rome? Nothing.

It has everything to do with some people interpreting the
Constitution. I say again, we should limit the Constitution to a bare-
bones document and follow the example of the Republic.

And no, this does not mean slaves and women weaving *sigh*
bene vale in pace deorum
M.Hortensia Maior TRP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33822 From: C. Fabia Livia Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
> Also, I hope you shall convene with me, it is highly
> doubtful that any decision
> of a magistrate might become in any way effective if
> it is not made public.
>
> If you agree, as I hope you do, with the principle
> that the Tribunes have the
> right and duty to veto any official action of a
> magistrate if it is against the
> Constitution and so on, it logically comes from it
> that the Tribunes must be
> placed in a position to know of that action.

This seems like a good opportunity to discuss whether
we in fact think this is what the tribunes should be
doing (irrespective of what the constitution says).

I agree that the constitution appears to put you in a
rather difficult situation, because for instance I
could take some action over here in Britannia and you
wouldn't necessarily know about it. So I do see where
you're coming from.

But let's look at this from a historical perspective -
the tribunes couldn't be everywhere at once, even
within Rome. If someone feared they needed
protection, they could go to the tribunes and ask, but
the tribunes were not required to know everything that
every magistrate was doing or intending to do - they
couldn't, it wasn't possible. As NR moves further
away from sole reliance on the internet, and towards
real life activities, these practical issues will come
up again and again.

Is it time to change the constitution and make the
role of the tribunes more historical?

> Really, I do not understand where this hostility
> comes from, we are all (well,
> with one exception or two, maybe) trying to do our
> work fully and at our best.

Believe me, I'm not being hostile (you would know if I
was), I'm just trying to understand your reasoning. I
think I see better where you're coming from now that
you've mentioned people who are denied citizenship,
too, as it's true you can't get that from the website.

It doesn't deal with all of the problem, but
provincial governors are automatically advised of
every new citizen in their province - a similar
automatic process could presumably be used to notify
the tribunes of approvals (and possibly denials,
depending on exactly how it all works). But then
again maybe we should change the job description so
you don't have to worry about it :)

Livia





___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33823 From: aoctaviaindagatrix Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Salvete Omnes,

While this whole idea seems one drawn out of thin air, I'm
seriously bothered by the section snipped at the end of this post.
The idea that, underlying all actions of NR, the Tribunes ultimately
have "control" of them all, is ridiculous. Control is a powerful
word.
Just use the citizenship approval process as an example. There are
usually multiple emails back and forth with a prospective citizen,
each one working out name choices and answering many questions.
Under DCF's (pardon the abbreviation) assertion, he controls the
name choices for every new citizen, he chooses their family and
every other aspect of a new citizenship.
Were this assertion carried out to all magistrates of all stripes,
then ultimately he controls the entirety of NR, in short, he becomes
Dictator by simply veto'ing everything until it fits his bill. Of
course, there are other Tribunes to counter this, but how much
gumming up of the works could this cause until it is repaired?
As to the hostility, I think that Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
should review his own posts, which have an arrogant and superior
tone and are not at all short on imperiousness and sarcasm.

Valete,
Annia Octavia Indagatrix

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
<dom.con.fus@e...> wrote:
> Salve
>
<SNIP>
> I'm of the idea that the actions of a magistrate must be made, if
not public,
> at
> least accessible to the ones who are supposed to control them.
That, again, if
> the Tribunes have to have a way to effectively perform the duties
assigned to
> them by the Constitutio.
<SNIP>
> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
> Founder of Gens Constantinia
> Tribunus Plebis
> Aedilis Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33824 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Fuscus on Gentes and Familiae
CN·SALVIVS·ASTVR·QVIRITIBVS·S·P·D

S·V·B·E·E·V

I have recently read some comments written by Tribunus Plebis Fuscus
about his plans for our current familial system, and I would like to
add my own impressions to the discussion. After all, the reform to
bring the familial system in Nova Roma close to something that barely
resembles its historical counterpart has been long and very hard, and
we should not step back now that we are so close to the goal.

Tribunus Fuscus scripsit:

> On the matter of gentes and familiae, I announce you that is my firm intention
> to propose, within next month, a lex to the comitia to revise the present law
> and partially bring back the old system (even if I can forecast already the
> yells and turmoil it will cause).
>
> To the very least, it is my intention to do in a way that the name of the gentes
> currently in Nova Roma will be closed for future applicants. I strongly feel
> the fact that the founders of those gentes within Nova Roma and who have put
> their efforts in them, sometimes for years, have given no space to
> see who can bring their name or not as maybe historical but profoundly unfair
> and unjust.

I have recently become the "reviver" (a much more appropriate term
than "founder") of the most honourable gens Salvia. Does that mean
that I have the right to say who can bear the nomen Salvius? Who could
have given me that right? The original Salvii didn't, that is for
sure.

It is just like if I demanded to be asked permission every time
someone wanted to have 'Gnaeus' as praenomen.

I have the impression that the historical gentes can not possibly be
'owned' by anyone. Just like you can not stop anyone from having the
same surname you have: imagine a certain Smith claiming to be the only
true Smith of all Smiths. :-)

> And even for the historicity I'd have some doubt: I have serious doubts the
> Censores would had given the first former-barbarian moving in town tha name of
> a patrician family or of an anyway preminent gens in Rome.

Well, I am afraid that your serious doubts are founded in a lack of
historical knowledge. When Joseph ben Mattathias became a Roman
citizen, he adopted the name Titus Flavius Josephus -- and you can bet
that the gens Flavia was pretty old by that time.

We can find many similar examples. There was, for example, a certain
C. Julius Vercondaridubnus, an Aeduan noble (with a cognomen like that
there probably was very little doubt about his Gaulishness) who became
a Roman citizen and reached a high position in the provincial
administration of Gallia Lugdunensis. He became one of the Julii, and
there were few gentes that would deserve the title of "preeminent"
like the gens Julia did at the time. So there you have your former
barbarian. You can read about this person in the following documents:

http://www.livius.org/li-ln/livy/periochae/periochae134.html
http://argentoratum.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/aurweb/BAHR/PdhpDEBAHR?aur_file=dhpb.I

We must get rid of a certain historical misconception that has been
around in Nova Roma since it was founded, more based -- I suspect --
on historical novels than on historical knowledge. The Julii were not
an exclusive bunch, and neither were the Claudii. There were thousands
of Julii, Claudii, Fabii and Papirii everywhere in the Roman world
that were bakers, merchants, cleaners, sailors and papyri-makers, all
of them plebeians to the bone.

Now, being one of the Julii *Caesares* was a completey different affair.

It is the familia that matters. Not the gens.

> I'd suggest the ones dealing with the website to wait a moment
> before eradicating the present database and scripts.. who knows, they
> might come to be handy again.

On the contrary; I'd suggest that the database and scripts are, once
and for all, changed to reflect the current approach of Nova Roma
towards gentes and familiae. An approach based on History.

> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
> Founder of Gens Constantinia
> Tribunus Plebis
> Aedilis Urbis

On a personal note, tribune; are you aware that a member of a gens
called 'Constantinia' would have the nomen 'Constantinius', and not
'Constantinus'? Not that there ever was such a gens, of course;
'Constantinus' is a cognomen, and the emperor usually known as
'Constantine' was a member of the gens Valeria.

BENE·VALETE·TV·TVIQVE·OMNES

CN·SALVIVS·T·F·A·NEP·OVF·ASTVR·SCRIPSIT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33825 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: family!
Salvete,

what a good news!! Congratulations to you both and welcome to the baby boy!! I am very
pleased for you (and proud to count a new Roman among us)

Valete,

Sextus Apollonius Scipio




__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33826 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Salve,

By Minerva and Apolo, and by Ceres and Dianas, patronesses of the
sainct plebeian magistratures.

When I was Tribune, I noticed the overwhelming power a Tribune could
have. Seeing this, a Tribune must be extra careful what everything he
says.

The good Tribune of NR must win by sweetness and reasoning much more
than the force of the Tribunicia Potestas. On Livius there is some
bloodly episodes about.

Alas, there is some inner questionings of the magistrature (alas, it
remembers me a terrible and horrible discussion on later ianuary,
about a topic on a private list, remember? I was very disgusted by
this...) that must be kept ´privately´.

How many times this praetor has questioned personally the consules,
censores, tribunes or his own colleague? Many times, they know, I
dont need to recall how terriblely legalist I can be. But there was
all daily work of the republic, said on Concordia and privately.

However, when we go public, things have a greater weight. We arent
naive, when you ´ask on public´ a magistrate, it seems to all the
magistrate isnt doing its duties. It is a secondary effect. We dont
want, but it happens all time. Perhaps in perfect beings like the
gods this doesnt happen, but we are far away of this perfection. So,
we must ´learn how to live´.

One thing is writing personaly to the magistrates ´the ML is a mess´,
´the citizenship is late´, ´the taxes are awful´ - just to make
exemples of questioning of the praetorship, censorship and
consulship. However, when saying privately, the situation always is a
advice on most times, we can be ´intimate of the person´ we can
share. Indeed, we are not perfect, neither NR is our main duty on
life, so we problably we will fail terriblely on all our
magistratures sometimes. But what we don´t want is beeing public
´admonished´. Alas, I am remembering... hum...

Now, a advice. It has nothing with ML moderation, just a ´un-asked´
advice. Listen if you want.

On written discussions, our words uses to be ´heavier and darker´
than personally talking, where we can smile, touch, slab the back,
make some joke, make faces, etc.

So, try to be EXTRA NICE here. Your words, Tribune Fuscus, feels to
lots of people ´much agressive´ sometimes. Be extra careful to the
WAY you say things, otherwise, you will create a un-necessary 'bad
will' toward you.


Valete bene in pacem deorum,
L. Arminius Faustus PR


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
<dom.con.fus@e...> wrote:
> Salve
>
> In data Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:17:27 -0000, Lucius Arminius Faustus
> <lafaustus@y...> ha scritto:
>
> > Alas, allow me to public congratulate the censores by their work
for
> > NR.
> >
> > I see no wrong on their acting, and both Quintilianus and Marinus
are
> > exemples to all of us follow.
>
>
> What Faustus said here made me believe I was, peraphs,
misunderstood.
>
> I'd like to make clear that I'm not saying the Censores have done
something
> wrong, I'm actually generally sure they (and the people who work
with them in a
> pretty commendable way) have done everything in an absolutely
correct way
> regarding their duties and obligations, but that, as a matter of
principle, the
> Tribunes must be able to check on their actions in order to attend
to their own
> obligations.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33827 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: family!
Scipio, my dearest colleague on the interpretation works during 2002!
I missed you! You come back finnaly!

Vale,
L. Arminius Faustus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Sextus Apollonius Scipio
<scipio_apollonius@y...> wrote:
> Salvete,
>
> what a good news!! Congratulations to you both and welcome to the
baby boy!! I am very
> pleased for you (and proud to count a new Roman among us)
>
> Valete,
>
> Sextus Apollonius Scipio
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 33828 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-02-23
Subject: Re: Citizenship approvals - again
Salve Livia

(I hope I can call you like that, that's how you signed yourself and at the
moment, using webmail, I can't check your full name.. no disrespect meant)

> This seems like a good opportunity to discuss whether
> we in fact think this is what the tribunes should be
> doing (irrespective of what the constitution says).

See, that is exactly what (unlike Maior) I can't do.. I can't think of
things irrespective of what the Constitution says. I did swear to protect
and uphold it and that is what I'm intend to do. It's my duty, and I don't
take my duties lightly.

I'm ready to fully agree with you that historically things were different, I
actually already admitted it, but untill the moment the Constitutio will not
mirror the history, I shall, I have, I want to follow the Constitutio. There
is no other thing I can do, or that I would do.

>
> I agree that the constitution appears to put you in a
> rather difficult situation, because for instance I
> could take some action over here in Britannia and you
> wouldn't necessarily know about it.  So I do see where
> you're coming from.
>
> But let's look at this from a historical perspective -
> the tribunes couldn't be everywhere at once, even
> within Rome.  If someone feared they needed
> protection, they could go to the tribunes and ask, but
> the tribunes were not required to know everything that
> every magistrate was doing or intending to do - they
> couldn't, it wasn't possible.  As NR moves further
> away from sole reliance on the internet, and towards
> real life activities, these practical issues will come
> up again and again.

Yes, Livia, which doesn't mean the tribunes have to sit in their houses
untill someone knocks on their doors. One thing is not acting when you don't
know a magistrate is taking actions, one thing is knowingly not even trying
to get yourself informed when you know something is going on. I hope you
shall agree with me on this point.

For that matter, incidentally, I try... I did subscribe many of the
provincial lists and I'm trying to follow things there. I perfectly know
it's somewhat impossible to take care fully of the obligations the
Constitution casts on a Tribunes, but that is not excuse for at least trying
the best you can.

Here, there is a magistrate action that is to the uttermost importance for
the whole Nova Roma, as it grants the maximum power a citizen have, the one
of votin. As I said, I fully believe everything is carried on in the best
way possible, but it is my precise duty, or at least it seems to me to and
you apparently agreed with me, to try and check it.

> Is it time to change the constitution and make the
> role of the tribunes more historical?

Yes, possibly so, but untill that happens, I can't but follow the
Constitutio as it (or at least, as I an interprete it in the most
intellectually honest way, because I could be wrong of course, but...).

> Believe me, I'm not being hostile (you would know if I
> was), I'm just trying to understand your reasoning.  I
> think I see better where you're coming from now that
> you've mentioned people who are denied citizenship,
> too, as it's true you can't get that from the website.

I didn't mean you were being hostile, but definitely someone has been.

> It doesn't deal with all of the problem, but
> provincial governors are automatically advised of
> every new citizen in their province - a similar
> automatic process could presumably be used to notify
> the tribunes of approvals (and possibly denials,
> depending on exactly how it all works).

See, I personally think that would be sufficient, if it included a
motivation about why a given person was denied citizenship and if the
tribunes would be allowed, upon request, to be presented with all the
documents (whatever they are) related to a given case, in order to, at most,
conduct some random checks.


> again maybe we should change the job description so
> you don't have to worry about it :)

again, yes, maybe, but untill then...

vale

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis
--
Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f

Sponsor:
Email.it Phone Card: chiami in tutto il mondo a tariffe imbattibili da
tutti i telefoni fissi e cellulari! Clicca e scopri come
Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=2686&d=20050223