Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Apl 8-18

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34690 From: Maxima Date: 2005-04-08
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34691 From: Maior Date: 2005-04-08
Subject: Re: Academia Course: Rituals of the Religio Romana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34692 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34694 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Flavian revenge
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34695 From: Alyson Hill Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Lares penatesque!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34696 From: Maxima Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34697 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34698 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34699 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - subriptions open for chariot races!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34700 From: philipp.hanenberg@web.de Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34701 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Excellent year by site for ancient times
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34702 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34703 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: Lares penatesque!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34704 From: James Mathews Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: "Roman Times" and "Pilum" Quarterly's
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34705 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34706 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34707 From: philipp.hanenberg@web.de Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34708 From: James Mathews Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Genius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34709 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: LUDI MEGALENSES - Cert. Historicum SOLUTION - No6 - (and Temporary
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34710 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: LUDI MEGALENSES - Certamen Historicum - No7 (The Last Question)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34711 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34712 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: Genius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34713 From: Alyson Hill Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: Lares penatesque!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34714 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Good Site for Source Documents
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34715 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34716 From: romanman66 Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Question about Roman names
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34717 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34720 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34721 From: Marcus Audens Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: "Aquila" -- March Issue
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34722 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34723 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: LUDI MEGALENSES - Cert. Historicum SOLUTION - No7
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34724 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Certamen Historicum MEGALESIAE - FINAL CLASSIFICATION!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34725 From: Salix Cantaber Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: LUDI MEGALENSES - Chariot races - FINAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34726 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Ludi Megalenses - the end (almost)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34727 From: asregulus@bellsouth.net Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Congradulations I. Sempronia Magna!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34728 From: Maior Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Certamen Historicum MEGALESIAE - FINAL CLASSIFICATION!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34729 From: Julilla Sempronia Magna Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Congradulations I. Sempronia Magna!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34730 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Certamen Historicum MEGALESIAE - FINAL CLASSIFICATION!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34731 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34732 From: Julilla Sempronia Magna Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Certamen Historicum MEGALESIAE - FINAL CLASSIFICATION!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34733 From: Triarius Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Thanks for the Ludi !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34734 From: David Wallace Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34735 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Thanks for the Ludi !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34736 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Certamen Historicum MEGALESIAE - FINAL CLASSIFICATION!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34737 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Certamen Historicum MEGALESIAE - FINAL CLASSIFICATION!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34738 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Ludi Megalenses - the end (almost)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34739 From: Maxima Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34740 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: Re: Ludi Megalenses - the end (almost)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34741 From: Maxima Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34742 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34743 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: [Fwd: Roman Legions book release and author presentations]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34744 From: Marcus Audens Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: "Aquila" (Eagle)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34745 From: pjtuloup@yahoo.fr Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: Re: hi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34746 From: Simon Larente Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: Re: hi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34747 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: Re: hi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34748 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: Re: Ludi Megalenses - the end (almost)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34749 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34750 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2005-04-12
Subject: Bibliographies and $$$ for NR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34752 From: Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Date: 2005-04-12
Subject: Caution: Viruses
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34753 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-12
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - subscribe the chariot races!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34754 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-12
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - Opening of the festival
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34755 From: Maior Date: 2005-04-12
Subject: Re: LUDI CERIALES - Opening of the festival
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34756 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-04-12
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34757 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-12
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #1
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34758 From: P. Minucia Tiberia Date: 2005-04-12
Subject: MAGNA MATER PROJECT BULLETIN APRIL 2758 A.U.C.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34759 From: Maxima Date: 2005-04-12
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34761 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Academia Thules: First Course on Roman Law
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34762 From: walkyr@aol.com Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Re: Administration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34763 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: NEW Interview the Expert - Dr. Baldassarre Conticello
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34764 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - Battle Against Carthago!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34765 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #2
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34766 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Battlefield Britain
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34767 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Magna Mater Donations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34768 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34769 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: First Course on Roman Law -- Instructor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34770 From: Maxima Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Re: Battlefield Britain
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34771 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Re: Battlefield Britain
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34772 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Fwd: New Actual Chariot Races and Legio Demonstrations in Jordan
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34773 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Re: Academia Thules: First Course on Roman Law
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34774 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Re: Battlefield Britain
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34775 From: romanman66 Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34776 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34777 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34778 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus - first day results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34779 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-04-14
Subject: Re: Magna Mater Donations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34780 From: Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus Date: 2005-04-14
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34782 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-04-14
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34783 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-04-14
Subject: Gallia - Edictum Propraetoricium XXX
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34784 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-04-14
Subject: Gallia - Edictum Propraetoricium XXXI
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34785 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-14
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #3
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34786 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-04-14
Subject: Name change to: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34787 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-14
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - from Ovid's Fasti
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34788 From: Messalina Minia Date: 2005-04-14
Subject: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of United Ro
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34789 From: Triarius Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34790 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34791 From: Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34793 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Technical question about Yahoo Groups
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34794 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: Technical question about Yahoo Groups
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34795 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #4
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34796 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #4
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34797 From: Lucius Apollonius Clement Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: Technical question about Yahoo Groups
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34798 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34799 From: Jordan Perry Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: New Rome Group
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34800 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34801 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34802 From: Simon Larente Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34803 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34804 From: JOEY NICOLE KING Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34805 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34806 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34807 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34808 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA -Empire of United
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34809 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA -Empire of United
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34810 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA -Empire of United
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34811 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA -Empire of United
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34812 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA -Empire of United
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34813 From: Simon Larente Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA -Empire of United
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34814 From: S E M Troianus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA -Empire of United
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34815 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34816 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Need a Host for Provincial Website
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34817 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA -Empire of United
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34818 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Multiple Questions /was Re: [Nova-Roma] Need a Host for Provincial
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34819 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Pig Latin Tranaslator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34820 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: Multiple Questions /was Re: [Nova-Roma] Need a Host for Provinc
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34821 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Uni...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34822 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Uni...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34823 From: Sextus Octavius Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: A question on religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34824 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: A question on religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34825 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: A question on religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34826 From: Triarius Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34827 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: Multiple Questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34828 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Uni...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34829 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34831 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34832 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34833 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: Multiple Questions /was Re: [Nova-Roma] Need a Host for Provinc
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34834 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus - third day results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34835 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #5
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34836 From: JOEY NICOLE KING Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: Pig Latin Tranaslator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34837 From: Triarius Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34838 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Please stop the joking, we need Provincia Gallia!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34839 From: Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: Please stop the joking, we need Provincia Gallia!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34840 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: Please stop the joking, we need Provincia Gallia!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34841 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - Battle Against Carthago! - RESULTS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34842 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - Battle Against Carthago! PART 2
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34843 From: siegfried234 Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34845 From: Sextus Octavius Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: LUDI CERIALES - Battle Against Carthago! - RESULTS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34846 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34847 From: Triarius Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Ludi Circenses for Kids
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34848 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: A question on religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34849 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #6
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34850 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #6
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34851 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Oxyrhynchus Papyri
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34852 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - Chariot Races - QUARTERS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34853 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: LUDI CERIALES - Chariot Races - QUARTERS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34854 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #6
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34855 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: Please stop the joking, we need Provincia Gallia!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34856 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: Please stop the joking, we need Provincia Gallia!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34857 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Reproduction Roman Furniture
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34858 From: Lucia Cassia Silvana Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: LUDI CERIALES - Chariot Races - QUARTERS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34859 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - Battle Against Carthago! - Temporary Results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34860 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: LUDI CERIALES - Battle Against Carthago! - Temporary Results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34861 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: Reproduction Roman Furniture
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34862 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Stirps and Re: Roman Names
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34863 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: Reproduction Roman Furniture
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34864 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: Stirps and Re: Roman Names
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34865 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: LUDI CERIALES - Battle Against Carthago! - Temporary Results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34866 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: Oxyrhynchus Papyri
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34867 From: Julilla Sempronia Magna Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: Reproduction Roman Furniture
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34870 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-18
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - Chariot Races - SEMIFINALS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34871 From: Lucia Cassia Silvana Date: 2005-04-18
Subject: Cerialia foxes?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34872 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-04-18
Subject: Re: Stirps and Re: Roman Names
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34873 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-04-18
Subject: Re: Oxyrhynchus Papyri
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34874 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-18
Subject: Re: Oxyrhynchus Papyri
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34875 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-18
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #7 (LAST ONE!)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34876 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2005-04-18
Subject: Non-Fire Public Sacrifice/Re: [Nova-Roma] Cerialia foxes?



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34690 From: Maxima Date: 2005-04-08
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Salve, Peter

Wasn't that something to see all those different Eastern Church patriarchs? I've never seen some many all in one place at one time. It was wonderful.

I do have a query. Why do some wear such intricately decorated and colorful attire and crowns while others wear only black garb? One tall fellow, in black robes, wore a bright blue, square headdress with no veil covering over it. Thought that was interesting. Anyone know what Church he represents?

It would have been nice if they could have gotten them all in one picture, and then in the caption, say who they all were and what Church they were from.

Bene vale

Maxima Valeria Messallina


Peter Bird <p.bird@...> wrote:

Salvete

I watched the entire funeral - it was a 'proper' mass, reverent, dignified and beautiful. The colours and sights and music and plainchant, and the beautiful old Latin all combined to make it a moving and memorable experience. The Litany of the Saints at the end took me back 40 years into the realms of nostalgia, and to have the Eastern patriarchs with their moving Greek and Syriac prayers over the coffin was a beautiful and universal touch. It all goes to show how well the Catholic Church can produce such moments when it really wants to.

Johannes Paulus II PP in pace aeterna requiescat.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Make Yahoo! your home page

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34691 From: Maior Date: 2005-04-08
Subject: Re: Academia Course: Rituals of the Religio Romana
Well I for one am celebrating the feria of Magna Mater, so I prefer to
be happy than otherwise! Why not join in?
M. Hortensia Maior

-
In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Diana Aventina <dianaaventina@y...>
wrote:
> > Please there is no reason for anger.
>
> Trust me little girl, you've never seen me angry.
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
> http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34692 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
G. Equitius Cato V. Valeriae Messalinae quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

I wasn't able to watch the funeral (I was at work), but I know that
the Patriarch of Constantinople, Metropolitan Kyrill of Russia, and
the head of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church were there. Other members
of the Roman Catholic clergy who follow the Eastern (or Byzantine)
Rite would dress similiarly to their Orthodox counterparts.

The proper dress of an Orthodox prelate is as follows:

PHELONION - this outer cloak has the same origin as the Roman
chasuble. Its very full form in the Byzantine usage is reminiscent of
the ancient paenula which gradually replaced the Roman toga as the
outer garment of the upper classes toward the close of the imperial
period. This ample vestment is often cut slightly up the front to
facilitate arm movements and is marked by a large cross on the back.

The SAKKOS that vestment proper to bishops which gradually replaced
their use of the phelonion. Directly copied from late imperial
regalia, it is a shorter tunic with ample sleeves and marked with a
cross on the back. It is worn over the sticharion or under-tunic.

The OMOPHORION - probably one of the most ancient of the bishop's
vestments with a strictly symbolic origin. Copied from the scarf of
office worn by the Roman Emperor and other officials, it identified
the bishop as head of the community. A large, long band of cloth it is
marked with crosses and is passed around the neck hanging in front and
behind. A "small" omophorion worn simply around the neck and hanging
in two pendants on the chest is sometimes worn in place of the large
one. The omophorion is worn by all Eastern bishops and by Western
metropolitans in an abbreviated form (the pallium).

The PECTORAL CROSS - In the Byzantine usage this is not a distinctive
emblem of bishops but may be worn by authorized priests as a sign of a
special honor or dignity. In the Russian usage all priests make use of
it. The bishop wears the pectoral cross in conjunction with the
Engolpion.

The ENGOLPIA - medallions depicting Christ and the Mother of God are a
distinctive sign of the Byzantine bishop. A metropolitan, archbishop
or patriarch usually wears two with the pectoral cross; a bishop
employs one.

The CROWN - the bishop's head covering, adapted from the imperial
regalia when the Byzantine clergy began assuming civil functions. The
crown is embroidered and bears small icons and is often surmounted by
a cross. Some archimandrites and archpriests, although not of
Episcopal character, have the right to the use of the crown.

The MANDYAS - or mantle is the monastic choir and processional cloak.
A bishop's mandyas is generally purple in color and is adorned by
icons of the four evangelists and by ornamental bands, suggesting the
streams of grace flowing through the bishop's ministry.

The KAMELAVKION - a cylindrical hat, usually with a small brim on top,
worn by the three orders of priesthood. Monks, bishops (since they
were monks) and certain dignitaries usually cover this hat with the
Epano-kamelavkion, the black monastic veil.

The EPIGONATION - a diamond-shaped ornament suspended by a cord from
the left shoulder and hanging at the right knee. It is properly a
bishop's vestment but is worn by some priests as a sign of dignity. It
probably originated in the imperial regalia as a sort of purse or bag
but now is purely ceremonial, marked with a cross and made of
cloth-covered cardboard.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34694 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Flavian revenge
-----Original Message-----
From: A. Apollonius Cordus <a_apollonius_cordus@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 00:04:15 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus




> Yes, it was Titus. Titus passed away in 81. The
> temple was
> destroyed in 70. It was Titus who was in power, not
> yet his brother
> Domitian.


When the temple was destroyed, Flavius Titus was in charge of the Roman army in Palestine.
Flavius Vespasian had left him in command after the successful battle at Cremona that finished
any hope that Vitellius would retain the throne and Vespasian was on his way to join the Army.
Flavius was just carrying out his father's orders, however, so it seems unfair to single him out.
SOP used by Romans against revolters was the destruction of their sacred places.
So the temple and the holy of holies were doomed no matter held the baton.
Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34695 From: Alyson Hill Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Lares penatesque!
Hello!

I've been wanting for a long time to get or make lares and penates
statuettes for my home. Has anyone else done this? Are there any
recommendations of how to go about this? I know nothing about how
Romans obtained theirs, and so I don't know the most authentic way to
proceed. Any advice is most welcome. Thanks!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34696 From: Maxima Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Salve, Gaius Equitius Cato

Thank you for all the information. I knew about the pallium, but not the names for the rest. It's so interesting all the history of their attire.

Bene vale

Maxima Valeria Messallina

gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:

G. Equitius Cato V. Valeriae Messalinae quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

I wasn't able to watch the funeral (I was at work), but I know that the Patriarch of Constantinople, Metropolitan Kyrill of Russia, and the head of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church were there. Other members of the Roman Catholic clergy who follow the Eastern (or Byzantine) Rite would dress similiarly to their Orthodox counterparts.

The proper dress of an Orthodox prelate is as follows:

PHELONION - this outer cloak has the same origin as the Roman
chasuble. Its very full form in the Byzantine usage is reminiscent of the ancient paenula which gradually replaced the Roman toga as the outer garment of the upper classes toward the close of the imperial period. This ample vestment is often cut slightly up the front to facilitate arm movements and is marked by a large cross on the back.

The SAKKOS that vestment proper to bishops which gradually replaced their use of the phelonion. Directly copied from late imperial regalia, it is a shorter tunic with ample sleeves and marked with a cross on the back. It is worn over the sticharion or under-tunic.

The OMOPHORION - probably one of the most ancient of the bishop's vestments with a strictly symbolic origin. Copied from the scarf of office worn by the Roman Emperor and other officials, it identified the bishop as head of the community. A large, long band of cloth it is marked with crosses and is passed around the neck hanging in front and behind. A "small" omophorion worn simply around the neck and hanging in two pendants on the chest is sometimes worn in place of the large
one. The omophorion is worn by all Eastern bishops and by Western metropolitans in an abbreviated form (the pallium).

The PECTORAL CROSS - In the Byzantine usage this is not a distinctive emblem of bishops but may be worn by authorized priests as a sign of a special honor or dignity. In the Russian usage all priests make use of it. The bishop wears the pectoral cross in conjunction with the Engolpion.

The ENGOLPIA - medallions depicting Christ and the Mother of God are a distinctive sign of the Byzantine bishop. A metropolitan, archbishop or patriarch usually wears two with the pectoral cross; a bishop employs one.

The CROWN - the bishop's head covering, adapted from the imperial regalia when the Byzantine clergy began assuming civil functions. The crown is embroidered and bears small icons and is often surmounted by a cross. Some archimandrites and archpriests, although not of Episcopal character, have the right to the use of the crown.

The MANDYAS - or mantle is the monastic choir and processional cloak. A bishop's mandyas is generally purple in color and is adorned by icons of the four evangelists and by ornamental bands, suggesting the streams of grace flowing through the bishop's ministry.

The KAMELAVKION - a cylindrical hat, usually with a small brim on top, worn by the three orders of priesthood. Monks, bishops (since they were monks) and certain dignitaries usually cover this hat with the Epano-kamelavkion, the black monastic veil.

The EPIGONATION - a diamond-shaped ornament suspended by a cord from the left shoulder and hanging at the right knee. It is properly a bishop's vestment but is worn by some priests as a sign of dignity. It probably originated in the imperial regalia as a sort of purse or bag but now is purely ceremonial, marked with a cross and made of
cloth-covered cardboard.

Valete bene,

Cato
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34697 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Salve Maxima Valeria!

I do so agree - as in royal weddings, etc., the newspapers usually print a
photo with a plan underneath so we know who they all were.

As far as I could see, there were two types of eastern rite prelates there:
the "uniate" churches (i.e., those in communion with Rome), who were among
the cardinals ranged along the front of St Peter's, and then almost the
entire Orthodox hierarchy sitting with all the other religious dignitaries
(including the Archbishop of Canterbury) in another block at the side. It
was nice to see the that Ecumenical Patriarch himself was there (the 'pope'
of the Orthodox Church, who is the primus inter pares of all the Orthodox
patriarchates), along with the patriarchs, metropolitans, katholikoi of most
of the Orthodox churches. Because they were not taking a liturgical part in
the funeral, they wore their usual black. The dress differs in each of the
churches - some where a black headdress, others white, whilst others wear
turban-like black headdresses (such as the Coptic Orthodox).

The uniates taking a liturgical part were wearing the eastern equivalents of
the Roman mass vestments, most of them wearing red and gold. Headdresses
differ from church to church, but most of the patriarchs and bishops (some
of whom are members of the College of Cardinals as well) wear a gold crown,
which is the equivalent of the western mitre. The vestments were indeed
gorgeous and reflected the importance of the ceremony (I remember when I was
a very young altar server our priest telling us that 'only the best is good
enough for God'). I was very impressed with the young English deacon who
chanted the gospel in perfect Latin - how he must have rehearsed that!
Incidentally, his vestment was a dalmatic - a vestment that is used in both
western and eastern rites.

I think, too, that the mixture of eastern and western dignitaries,
vestments, languages and rites all went to show how much the Church itself
still remains a universal body without one stereotypical way of doing things
- ie, plenty of room for everyone! Had we been watching a papal funeral 500
- 600 years ago, we would have seen virtually the same scenes and heard
virtually the same music and language. Interesting thought!

Vale optime.

Peter



_____

From: Maxima [mailto:violetphearsen@...]
Sent: 09 April 2005 03:06
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus



Salve, Peter

Wasn't that something to see all those different Eastern Church patriarchs?
I've never seen some many all in one place at one time. It was wonderful.

I do have a query. Why do some wear such intricately decorated and colorful
attire and crowns while others wear only black garb? One tall fellow, in
black robes, wore a bright blue, square headdress with no veil covering over
it. Thought that was interesting. Anyone know what Church he represents?

It would have been nice if they could have gotten them all in one picture,
and then in the caption, say who they all were and what Church they were
from.

Bene vale

Maxima Valeria Messallina


Peter Bird <p.bird@...> wrote:

Salvete

I watched the entire funeral - it was a 'proper' mass, reverent, dignified
and beautiful. The colours and sights and music and plainchant, and the
beautiful old Latin all combined to make it a moving and memorable
experience. The Litany of the Saints at the end took me back 40 years into
the realms of nostalgia, and to have the Eastern patriarchs with their
moving Greek and Syriac prayers over the coffin was a beautiful and
universal touch. It all goes to show how well the Catholic Church can
produce such moments when it really wants to.

Johannes Paulus II PP in pace aeterna requiescat.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Make Yahoo! your home page

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




_____

Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34698 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Thank you, Cato - most informative and useful! A couple of other vestments
not in your list - the orarion (for the deacon) and the epitrachelion (for
the priest), both corresponding to the western stole, though in the case of
the priest it is much wider than we use in the west. We could go on about
this for ever (!) given the variations found in the different Orthodox
traditions, but I found your explanation one of the clearest yet that I've
read. Thanks again.

Peter



_____

From: gaiusequitiuscato [mailto:mlcinnyc@...]
Sent: 09 April 2005 05:03
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus




G. Equitius Cato V. Valeriae Messalinae quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

I wasn't able to watch the funeral (I was at work), but I know that
the Patriarch of Constantinople, Metropolitan Kyrill of Russia, and
the head of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church were there. Other members
of the Roman Catholic clergy who follow the Eastern (or Byzantine)
Rite would dress similiarly to their Orthodox counterparts.

The proper dress of an Orthodox prelate is as follows:

PHELONION - this outer cloak has the same origin as the Roman
chasuble. Its very full form in the Byzantine usage is reminiscent of
the ancient paenula which gradually replaced the Roman toga as the
outer garment of the upper classes toward the close of the imperial
period. This ample vestment is often cut slightly up the front to
facilitate arm movements and is marked by a large cross on the back.

The SAKKOS that vestment proper to bishops which gradually replaced
their use of the phelonion. Directly copied from late imperial
regalia, it is a shorter tunic with ample sleeves and marked with a
cross on the back. It is worn over the sticharion or under-tunic.

The OMOPHORION - probably one of the most ancient of the bishop's
vestments with a strictly symbolic origin. Copied from the scarf of
office worn by the Roman Emperor and other officials, it identified
the bishop as head of the community. A large, long band of cloth it is
marked with crosses and is passed around the neck hanging in front and
behind. A "small" omophorion worn simply around the neck and hanging
in two pendants on the chest is sometimes worn in place of the large
one. The omophorion is worn by all Eastern bishops and by Western
metropolitans in an abbreviated form (the pallium).

The PECTORAL CROSS - In the Byzantine usage this is not a distinctive
emblem of bishops but may be worn by authorized priests as a sign of a
special honor or dignity. In the Russian usage all priests make use of
it. The bishop wears the pectoral cross in conjunction with the
Engolpion.

The ENGOLPIA - medallions depicting Christ and the Mother of God are a
distinctive sign of the Byzantine bishop. A metropolitan, archbishop
or patriarch usually wears two with the pectoral cross; a bishop
employs one.

The CROWN - the bishop's head covering, adapted from the imperial
regalia when the Byzantine clergy began assuming civil functions. The
crown is embroidered and bears small icons and is often surmounted by
a cross. Some archimandrites and archpriests, although not of
Episcopal character, have the right to the use of the crown.

The MANDYAS - or mantle is the monastic choir and processional cloak.
A bishop's mandyas is generally purple in color and is adorned by
icons of the four evangelists and by ornamental bands, suggesting the
streams of grace flowing through the bishop's ministry.

The KAMELAVKION - a cylindrical hat, usually with a small brim on top,
worn by the three orders of priesthood. Monks, bishops (since they
were monks) and certain dignitaries usually cover this hat with the
Epano-kamelavkion, the black monastic veil.

The EPIGONATION - a diamond-shaped ornament suspended by a cord from
the left shoulder and hanging at the right knee. It is properly a
bishop's vestment but is worn by some priests as a sign of dignity. It
probably originated in the imperial regalia as a sort of purse or bag
but now is purely ceremonial, marked with a cross and made of
cloth-covered cardboard.

Valete bene,

Cato






_____

Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34699 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - subriptions open for chariot races!
AVETE OMNES

The Ludi Ceriales are approaching and, while the Ludi Megalenses as
still going on, it's time for you to enlist your chariot for the
next races!

The citizen who want to take part in the next chariot races must
send an e-mail to Quintus Salix Cantaber at qsalixcant@....
Deadline for subscription is Wednesday April 13th. Each subscription
must bear the subject header "Ceriales Ludi Circenses" and include
the following information:


A. His/her name in Nova Roma

B. The name of his/her driver

C. The name of his/her chariot

D. His/her tactics for the Quarter and Semifinals

E. His/her tactics for the Finals

F. The name of his/her "factio" or team (Albata, Praesina, Russata,
or Veneta)

G. Dirty actions against another factio in a specific round (quarter-
final,
semi-final, or final) and amount of sesterces paid in support of it
(an entrant
does not have to pay sesterces to commission a dirty action, but
doing so
increases the chances of success

H. Defence against dirty actions in a specific round (quarter-final,
semi-final,
or final) and amount of sesterces paid in support of it (an entrant
does not
have to pay sesterces to defend against a dirty action, but doing so
decreases
the chances of success of the dirty action)

I. If sesterces from multiple entrants are pooled to take a dirty
action or
defend against a dirty action, the subscription of each entrant of
the pool must
so indicate.

Come on Novaromani! Maybe you lost the Megalesia ludi circenses? You
might win the Cerealia!

My thanks to Q Salix Cantaber for his help.

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34700 From: philipp.hanenberg@web.de Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Salve Maxima Valeria Messallina

All Vatican employers get an extra month salary when a pope dies and another extra one a new pope is found.
The next one is this impressive funural went back to an old tradition in the roman catholic church
the sign of peace before you get your comunion. This wasn't done since a long time.
Extraordinary was also the present of the whole religious leaders and this was also one of the very_very few moments the political leaders were so quiet and silent you can count it on one hand such happened before.
You could see definetly that traditions, thousands of yrs old can bring them to shut up.
Another impressive thing were the people who cry "Santo subito"
Vox populi, vox dei
They want to see JP II to become holy.
That's not so easy since some decades but the roman catholic church showed the world what they are!
And it is also an importand point when the collegium decides about to speak pope JP II "holy"
Not just wonders only. But it will need a minimum of 2 yrs.
But one of the most impressive facts are the youngsters who came in masses to be with "their" pope.
It was a perfect sign to all that young ppl are looking for a moral leadership also if they don't agree with all
pope JP II said.
I (personally) am not bound in christian religion but this furnural was something the world never saw before
(maybe in the ancient time in compare to the masses) and maybe will not see again while we are alive.
The tradition combined with the todays media possibilities showed us all that tradition may have a strong influence.

And in Krakov the celebrated iat 21:37 again, the time pope JP II left this world to join another world.
This mess was also very impressive when all the folk lighted up all the candles in silence and started the prays and a Mozart requiem.



As a side note: I switched between CNN and Eurpean TV stations and have to say CNN cut a lot and had a time different of some seconds :)
Well and sometimes they used to look around with their cameras while the others were still focused on St. Peter's Square



>Oh, most definitely the people of Rome, the Vatican, the Italian government, police and all the different securities forces, and >just everyone involved in this mammoth undertaking should give themselves a well deserved pat on the back for a job well >done, and what a job it was! All those dignitaries, religious leaders, news people, camera people, and four million or so >attendees, all crowded into one place and nothing happened other than what was planned. I hope they're all enjoying a >good bottle of wine and toasting their success. Hopefully, a bonus comes in their next paychecks, too. They've earned it!




Bene vale
Conservatus
______________________________________________________________
Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS!
Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://f.web.de/?mc=021193
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34701 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Excellent year by site for ancient times
Salve All

I like this site as it deal with source information year by year... enjoy..

http://www.attalus.org/index.html

Vale

Quintus Sertorius

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34702 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
If police work in Italia is anything like in New York
then they dont get bonuses on their checks but rather
civilian complaints because they did a good job.
--- violetphearsen@...
<violetphearsen@...> wrote:
> Salve, Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
> Oh, most definitely the people of Rome, the Vatican,
the Italian government, police and all the different
securities forces, and just everyone involved in this
mammoth undertaking should give themselves a well
deserved pat on the back for a job well done, and what
a job it was! All those dignitaries, religious
leaders, news people, camera people, and four million
or so attendees, all crowded into one place and
nothing happened other than what was planned. I hope
they're all enjoying a good bottle of wine and
toasting their success. Hopefully, a bonus comes in
their next paychecks, too. They've earned it!
>
> Bene vale
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
>
> "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)"
<mjk@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Maxima Valeria Mesallina,
>
> Agreed! I watched the funeral the wee hours of this
morning and must say I have never seen anything like
it in my life time and I was
> very moving.
> My complements to the Italian government, the city
of Rome and the
> Vatican on their terrific work and organization,
especially with
> such short notice. The great behavior and order of
the masses will
> certainly be legendary.
>
> Regards,
>
> QLP
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!

>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34703 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: Lares penatesque!
Q. Metellus Allysoni salutem dicit.

If I'm not mistaken, Sacred Source (www.sacredsource.com) offers a pair of
statuettes for this purpose. Generally speaking, though, I've always
preferred to either hand make my religious materials or to have them custom
made for the purpose. Essentially, when it comes to your home religion,
I've always maintained that the best way to handle it is to do what feels
right for you. Nothing about the home religion, excepting that there was
one, was all too static between households in Antiquity; it was a matter of
the tradition of the family, which likely came by matter of preference of an
ancestor. For the moment, we are all making our own traditions; go with
what feels right for *you*! (Incidentally, if you have access to _Aufsteig
und Niedergang der romischen Welt_, there is an article in there by D.P.
Harmon in volume II.16.2 called "The Family Festivals of Rome" (pp.
1592-1603). It might be worth your reading.)

Vale Bene in Pace Deorum,

Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Pius
Fetial
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34704 From: James Mathews Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: "Roman Times" and "Pilum" Quarterly's
Citizens of Nova Roma, and New Roman Lists;

I come before you to announce a reminder that April is the month for the current release of the two above subject publications.

Should anyone care to contribute an article, poem, or any other literary / artistic effort to either of these publications, I should be pleased to receive such. The following comments may answer some previous questions;

--submssion length 200 to 400 words, a longer article may be serialized in consideration of the overall document size;

--Plain text is preferred over Word or other similar formats;

--deadline submission id the 20th of the month in which published (April, July, and October);

--any topic related to the ancient Roman culture;

--Religious topics will be referred to the Religious Editor for approval;

--Political topics will be referred to the NR Main List;

--"Roman Times" is essentially a Civil Publication , and "Pilum" is a military publication.

--"Aquila" which is the Nova Roma Newsletter is also open for your consideration for articles of worth. This is your newsletter, and not mine. So far I have eight articles completed and submitted all of my writing. I should like to see some variation in the author content of this publication if that is possible;

--All submissions should be sent to me (address above);

As always, my thanks for your very kind consideration of this post and I wish you all good health and fair skies.

Very Respectfully;

Marcus Minucius-Tiberius Audens;

"Aquila" Editor Commentarium;

"Roman Times Quarterly" -- Editor Secundus;

"Pilum Quarterly" -- Editor Militarium;

"Nova Britannia Quarterly" -- Editor Provincia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34705 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Perhaps I am mistaken, but the Swiss Guard is
recognized as a standing army, is it not? Are they not
like modern day Praetorians?
--- violetphearsen@...
<violetphearsen@...> wrote:
>
> "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)"
<mjk@...> wrote:
>
> <<Salvete omnes,
>
> Something else to keep in mind about the Vatican
over the last 80 years. It has no army, navy or
airforce and can only fire barrages of spiritual
ammunition. The Pontifex Maximus can and does advise
the world's political leaders not to wage to war and
commit genocide but if these leaders choose not to
listen, then there is nothing more he can do.>>
>
> Salve, Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
> You are so correct with regard to the world's
leaders. Pope John Paul II was very critical of
President Bush and the war in Iraq, but that didn't
stop Bush.
> However, the people are another story, and judging
by the turnout at today's funeral, especially by young
people, and considering the growth of the Catholic
Church in Third World countries, the Pope's influence
is felt, albeit, indirectly.
> Which makes Pope John Paul II's successful part in
bringing down communism all the more remarkable.
> Still, that was more about being the right person in
the right place at the right time. It remains to be
seen if his successor can keep that level of influence
going. Should be interesting to watch.
>
> Bene vale
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34706 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Salvete,

Well as far as I know they are more of a body guard for the Vatican.
Publically they wear those 16th century outfits and carry those
halbarts but they are well trained in martial arts, hand to hand
combat and do have access to modern weapons; still "I" would hardly
call them a standing army (100 men)and their equipment and numbers
would not stop things from Rawanda to the Balkans I'm afraid.


Here is an article of interest for you to draw your own conclusions:

Current profile

While much of the work of the present day guards is ceremonial, they
are responsible for the security at the Apostolic Palace, the papal
apartment and the four main entrances to the Vatican. They are also
in charge of the pontiff's physical safety when he travels outside
the city state.

The Swiss Guard, the world's smallest and perhaps most colorful
army, has been the chief protectors of the pontiff. Clad in
Renaissance helmets and blue, red and yellow tunics (the colors of
the Medici family) that are said to have been designed by
Michelangelo. For routine work, the guards wear blue uniforms and
berets.

The Swiss Guard currently consists of a total of 100 men: 4
officials, 1 chaplain, 23 noncommissioned officers, 70 halbardiers,
and 2 drummers. The halbard is the traditional weapon carried by
Swiss Guards. The members of the Swiss Guard reside in a barrack in
Vatican City. They serve for two years, with the possibility of
extending the period to a maximum of 25 years. During this period
they receive training in self-defence, attend shooting practice,
take course in Italian and study the organizational structure of the
Vatican. At the end of the first year they must take a very thorough
exam.

Guard recruits must be Roman Catholic men of Swiss nationality who
are single, under 30 years old and stand at least 5-feet, 8-inches
tall. Guards need to have completed their initial military training
in the Swiss Armed Forces, and obtained a certificate of good
conduct from an ecclesiastical and a civil authority.

The Swiss Guard is all that is left of a pontifical military corps
that medieval popes once fielded to exert temporal power on a part
of the Italian peninsula - power that is now restricted to the 108
acres of Vatican City.

Historical development

The Swiss Guard was founded in 1505 by Pope Julius II as a stable
and disciplined corps of regular Swiss soldiers depending directly
on the Holy See, for the guarding of the person of the Roman Pontiff
and the Apostolic Palaces. January 21, 1506, is considered the
official founding when 150 Swiss soldiers arrived in Rome and
received the solemn blessing of Pope Julius II upon their arrival in
St. Peter's Square.

In the early years, the corps was disbanded several times, and the
guards had to retire, especially during the imprisonment or exile of
the Popes.

During the Sack of Rome on May 6, 1527, when heroically fighting
against the troops of Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, 147 Swiss Guards
died alongside then-commander Kaspar Roist, while 42 were saved with
Clement Vll (Giulio de' Medici) in Castle San Angelo.

On May 6 of each year, in commemoration of this historical date, the
newly recruited members of the Swiss Guard are sworn in the San
Damasco Courtyard in the Vatican, in four different languages -
German, French, Italian and Ladino - according to their canton of
origin. As they take their oath promising fidelity to the Pope and
the Church, the soldiers raise three fingers of their right hand,
symbolizing the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, while placing their
left hand on the flag of the Swiss Guard Corps. This banner is
formed by three shields representing the current Pope, the founder
of the Swiss Guard, Julius II, and the commander.

Sources: Vatican Information Service; L'Osservatore Romano, April
30, 1990; The Washington Post, May 5,1998

More details on this topic: http://www.vatican.va

The following documents were published in 1993 by the Coordinating
Commission for the Presence of Switzerland Abroad, and the Federal
Department of Foreign Affairs in Berne in cooperation with the Arts
Council of Switzerland, Pro Helvetia .



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> Perhaps I am mistaken, but the Swiss Guard is
> recognized as a standing army, is it not? Are they not
> like modern day Praetorians?
> --- violetphearsen@y...
> <violetphearsen@y...> wrote:
> >
> > "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)"
> <mjk@d...> wrote:
> >
> > <<Salvete omnes,
> >
> > Something else to keep in mind about the Vatican
> over the last 80 years. It has no army, navy or
> airforce and can only fire barrages of spiritual
> ammunition. The Pontifex Maximus can and does advise
> the world's political leaders not to wage to war and
> commit genocide but if these leaders choose not to
> listen, then there is nothing more he can do.>>
> >
> > Salve, Quintus Lanius Paulinus
> >
> > You are so correct with regard to the world's
> leaders. Pope John Paul II was very critical of
> President Bush and the war in Iraq, but that didn't
> stop Bush.
> > However, the people are another story, and judging
> by the turnout at today's funeral, especially by young
> people, and considering the growth of the Catholic
> Church in Third World countries, the Pope's influence
> is felt, albeit, indirectly.
> > Which makes Pope John Paul II's successful part in
> bringing down communism all the more remarkable.
> > Still, that was more about being the right person in
> the right place at the right time. It remains to be
> seen if his successor can keep that level of influence
> going. Should be interesting to watch.
> >
> > Bene vale
> >
> > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> >
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34707 From: philipp.hanenberg@web.de Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Salvete,

Indeed tey are what you call "Praetorians".
They are from Switzerland 'cause that's tradition on the one side and in the other it's one of the few countries which don't punish you if you're working as "soldier" for other countries as your own one.
They have to be catholic and a perfect life career, and they have to be single too

Vale
Conservatus


raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@...> schrieb am 09.04.2005 20:05:43:


Perhaps I am mistaken, but the Swiss Guard is
recognized as a standing army, is it not? Are they not
like modern day Praetorians?

______________________________________________________________
Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS!
Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://f.web.de/?mc=021193
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34708 From: James Mathews Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Genius
Citizens of Nova Roma;

I come to you with a question. How and from what choices does a Roman choose his "genius" or guarding spirit. I have a drawing of a household Larium which features a snake as the spirit of the man who owned the house. It is said in the few places that can find it that this genius was very important in the lives of Romans before the move to Christianity, So my questions to be a little more detailed is:

was a genius only taken from living things? If so, did the genius reflect the gifts of the person represented (bravery, tenacity, wisdom, etc)? If not , could non-living symbols be used, which related to a man's career, desires, dreams, etc.)? What elements were necessary to adopt a genius if a family did not have one, or if the family had lost touch with the ancestral one through disaster or death???

I am interested in this aspect of religious thought in the ancient Roman ways, and would wish to explore it further for my own information. I would appreciate any assistance in this and /or any references which might be able to answer my questions about this area of interest.

Respectfully;

Marcus Audens
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34709 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: LUDI MEGALENSES - Cert. Historicum SOLUTION - No6 - (and Temporary
SOLUTION No4 and TEMPORARY CLASSIFICATION No4 for the
Historical Contest

CN CORNELIUS LENTULUS QUIRITIBUS SPD:


Here follows the correct answer for the 4rd
question of our Certamen. (The classifications are
hereinafter!)


I. THE SOLUTION No6

QUAESTIO N°6 – Who was the Roman politician who
disturbed the Ludi Megalenses (accurately the ludi
scaenici) on divers occasions?

RESPONSUM N°6 – Publius Clodius Pulcher queered Ludi
Megalenses: the second time was in april 8 or 9 or 10
56 BC, when he mobbed and occupied the theatre with
beweaponed slaves – as Cicero informes us.


II. TEMPORARY CLASSIFICATION
(The rules of Certamen Historicum:
http://www.cohorssullana.grafosystem.ro/rules.htm)

Cato and Marinus (it seems) lost their chance... But
here is the new first best Sempronia! Now the question
is: Sempronia or Scholastica?


1. Iulilla Sempronia Magna 10 pts

2. Flavia Tullia Valeria Scholastica 8 pts

3. Cn. Equitius Marinus 7 pts

4. C. Equitius Cato 6 pts
4. Marca Hortensia Maior 6 pts

5. P. Memmius Albucius 4 pts

6. Iulia Cybele 2 pts


Come on, let's go, historians!!!
The endgame starts now!!!!!!

VALETE QVAM OPTIME!
Happy Megalesia-Days!

Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
Scriba Ludorum - Aed. L. Iulii Sullae
Undecimvir ad Diploma Sodalitatis Latinitatis Retractandum
Propraetor Pannoniae




__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34710 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: LUDI MEGALENSES - Certamen Historicum - No7 (The Last Question)
And now here is THE FINAL RACE!!!
This is the LAST QUESTION!

CN CORNELIVS LENTVLVS QVIRITIBVS SALVTEM DICIT:
Avete, Quirites, in the name of Aedilis L. Iulius!

We have arrived at the last question! There was a little problem with the 5th question because one of our contestants has published the correct answer on this mailinglist: we don't close him from the Certamen but we must to judge the Certamen No5 invalid. Therefore now I ask two questions in place of No5.


Here follows the LAST QUESTION for our Certamen Historicum:

QUAESTIO N°7 - (1) When could Roman citizens become priests of Magna Mater at first time in history of Mother Goddess being worshipped in Rome? (2) Who was the emperor who prohibited Roman priests of Cybele from castrating themselves?



We are waiting for your answers, and remember that you have just to write at the following email:
cnaeus_cornelius@...

Here are the rules of Certamen Historicum: http://www.cohorssullana.grafosystem.ro/rules.htm





VALETE QVAM OPTIME!
Happy Megalesia-Days!

Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
Scriba Ludorum - Aed. L. Iulii Sullae
Undecimvir ad Diploma Sodalitatis Latinitatis Retractandum
Propraetor Pannoniae


---------------------------------
Nuovo Yahoo! Messenger E' molto più divertente: Audibles, Avatar, Webcam, Giochi, Rubrica… Scaricalo ora!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34711 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
SALVETE CIVES

I come into this discussion just to give my testimony about the
perfect organization of all the ceremonies and corollary organized
after the death of Pope Ioannes Paulus II, as I was there as a
volunteer MD for the assistance of the pilgrims arrived to Rome.
I had never participated to such a big event in my life before, and
I was really impressed by the huge number of persons arrived in
Rome: all the ages and races were there represented, and I was happy
to be there. But what did astonished me was the organization of the
all event: everywhere in Rome there was someone (volunteer or
policeman or whatever) who could give you any needed informations or
free water. All the streets of Vatican City and the part of Rome
around were "presidiated" by forces that showed you where to go and
what to do. Hundreds of doctors and paramedics where in the
strategic points.
E.g., for me to get into S. Peter's square, I had to pass 8 (eight)
control posts where I had to show my documents and pass (even if I
had my coat of MD)...
With an exceptional organization and a big amount of luck, nothing
happened during these exceptional days!

VALETE
L IUL SULLA
Aedilis Curulis
Italia



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> If police work in Italia is anything like in New York
> then they dont get bonuses on their checks but rather
> civilian complaints because they did a good job.
> --- violetphearsen@y...
> <violetphearsen@y...> wrote:
> > Salve, Quintus Lanius Paulinus
> >
> > Oh, most definitely the people of Rome, the Vatican,
> the Italian government, police and all the different
> securities forces, and just everyone involved in this
> mammoth undertaking should give themselves a well
> deserved pat on the back for a job well done, and what
> a job it was! All those dignitaries, religious
> leaders, news people, camera people, and four million
> or so attendees, all crowded into one place and
> nothing happened other than what was planned. I hope
> they're all enjoying a good bottle of wine and
> toasting their success. Hopefully, a bonus comes in
> their next paychecks, too. They've earned it!
> >
> > Bene vale
> >
> > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> >
> >
> > "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)"
> <mjk@d...> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Maxima Valeria Mesallina,
> >
> > Agreed! I watched the funeral the wee hours of this
> morning and must say I have never seen anything like
> it in my life time and I was
> > very moving.
> > My complements to the Italian government, the city
> of Rome and the
> > Vatican on their terrific work and organization,
> especially with
> > such short notice. The great behavior and order of
> the masses will
> > certainly be legendary.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > QLP
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
>
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> >
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
> http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34712 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: Genius
Salvete,

As far as I know, your genius is your ideal
spiritual counterpart. Just as you are born with
being you, you are born with your genius.

Valete,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Mathews
> [mailto:jmath669642reng@...]
> Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 2:28 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Cc: newroman@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Genius
>
>
> Citizens of Nova Roma;
>
> I come to you with a question. How and from
what
> choices does a Roman choose his "genius" or
> guarding spirit. I have a drawing of a
household
> Larium which features a snake as the spirit of
the man
> who owned the house. It is said in the few
places that
> can find it that this genius was very important
in the
> lives of Romans before the move to Christianity,
So
> my questions to be a little more detailed is:
>
> was a genius only taken from living things? If
so, did
> the genius reflect the gifts of the person
represented
> (bravery, tenacity, wisdom, etc)? If not ,
could non-
> living symbols be used, which related to a man's
> career, desires, dreams, etc.)? What elements
were
> necessary to adopt a genius if a family did not
have
> one, or if the family had lost touch with the
ancestral
> one through disaster or death???
>
> I am interested in this aspect of religious
thought in
> the ancient Roman ways, and would wish to
explore it
> further for my own information. I would
appreciate
> any assistance in this and /or any references
which
> might be able to answer my questions about this
area
> of interest.
>
> Respectfully;
>
> Marcus Audens
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--------------
> ------~-->
> What would our lives be like without music,
dance,
> and theater?
> Donate or volunteer in the arts today at Network
for
> Good!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/pkgkPB/SOnJAA/Zx0JAA/w
> WQplB/TM
>
--------------------------------------------------
------------------~-
> >
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34713 From: Alyson Hill Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Re: Lares penatesque!
Thank you very much! I will look into the article at the first
available opportunity.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Caecilius Metellus"
<postumianus@g...> wrote:
> Q. Metellus Allysoni salutem dicit.
>
> If I'm not mistaken, Sacred Source (www.sacredsource.com) offers a
pair of
> statuettes for this purpose. Generally speaking, though, I've
always
> preferred to either hand make my religious materials or to have
them custom
> made for the purpose. Essentially, when it comes to your home
religion,
> I've always maintained that the best way to handle it is to do
what feels
> right for you. Nothing about the home religion, excepting that
there was
> one, was all too static between households in Antiquity; it was a
matter of
> the tradition of the family, which likely came by matter of
preference of an
> ancestor. For the moment, we are all making our own traditions;
go with
> what feels right for *you*! (Incidentally, if you have access to
_Aufsteig
> und Niedergang der romischen Welt_, there is an article in there
by D.P.
> Harmon in volume II.16.2 called "The Family Festivals of Rome" (pp.
> 1592-1603). It might be worth your reading.)
>
> Vale Bene in Pace Deorum,
>
> Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Pius
> Fetial
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34714 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2005-04-09
Subject: Good Site for Source Documents
Salve All

This is a good site for source documents... Good for research...

http://www.exovedate.com/ancient_timeline_one.html

Vale

Quintus Sertorius

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34715 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Salvete

I think the City of Rome is to be heartily congratulated on the amazing way
they organised the reception of millions of pilgrims - it must have been a
mind-boggling task, and one which they performed so smoothly. I wonder what
other city in the world would have been able to cope so well. I wonder, too,
how much the whole thing must have cost!

Valete optime

Peter



_____

From: Lucius Iulius [mailto:21aprile@...]
Sent: 09 April 2005 23:27
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus




SALVETE CIVES

I come into this discussion just to give my testimony about the
perfect organization of all the ceremonies and corollary organized
after the death of Pope Ioannes Paulus II, as I was there as a
volunteer MD for the assistance of the pilgrims arrived to Rome.
I had never participated to such a big event in my life before, and
I was really impressed by the huge number of persons arrived in
Rome: all the ages and races were there represented, and I was happy
to be there. But what did astonished me was the organization of the
all event: everywhere in Rome there was someone (volunteer or
policeman or whatever) who could give you any needed informations or
free water. All the streets of Vatican City and the part of Rome
around were "presidiated" by forces that showed you where to go and
what to do. Hundreds of doctors and paramedics where in the
strategic points.
E.g., for me to get into S. Peter's square, I had to pass 8 (eight)
control posts where I had to show my documents and pass (even if I
had my coat of MD)...
With an exceptional organization and a big amount of luck, nothing
happened during these exceptional days!

VALETE
L IUL SULLA
Aedilis Curulis
Italia



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> If police work in Italia is anything like in New York
> then they dont get bonuses on their checks but rather
> civilian complaints because they did a good job.
> --- violetphearsen@y...
> <violetphearsen@y...> wrote:
> > Salve, Quintus Lanius Paulinus
> >
> > Oh, most definitely the people of Rome, the Vatican,
> the Italian government, police and all the different
> securities forces, and just everyone involved in this
> mammoth undertaking should give themselves a well
> deserved pat on the back for a job well done, and what
> a job it was! All those dignitaries, religious
> leaders, news people, camera people, and four million
> or so attendees, all crowded into one place and
> nothing happened other than what was planned. I hope
> they're all enjoying a good bottle of wine and
> toasting their success. Hopefully, a bonus comes in
> their next paychecks, too. They've earned it!
> >
> > Bene vale
> >
> > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> >
> >
> > "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)"
> <mjk@d...> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Maxima Valeria Mesallina,
> >
> > Agreed! I watched the funeral the wee hours of this
> morning and must say I have never seen anything like
> it in my life time and I was
> > very moving.
> > My complements to the Italian government, the city
> of Rome and the
> > Vatican on their terrific work and organization,
> especially with
> > such short notice. The great behavior and order of
> the masses will
> > certainly be legendary.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > QLP
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
>
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> >
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
> http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250






_____

Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34716 From: romanman66 Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Question about Roman names
Salvete Novoromani!

For many years, I've been an admirer of Ancient Rome and of Classical
and Hellenistic culture in general. I don't believe in reincarnation,
but if I have lived before, it was surely as a Roman around 100 CE.
However, only very recently did I discover the existence of Nova Roma
in our time. I must say that it seems to be a dream come true –
founding a society of people who believe in the Classical ideals,
with the ultimate goal of establishing an independent nation has been
a recurrent fantasy of mine. And since 9-11, I really believe that we
need to remember our roots, and focus on the best of Western
civilisation. We need a new Renaissance, not a new Constantine `the
Great'.

Now to my point. When thinking about applying for a citizenship, I
have to consider the choice of a Roman name. There's a lot of
information on the website about that, but I still feel uncertain
about a few points, especially after the recent reform regarding gens
and familia (Lex equitia de familia). I hope someone with knowledge
in these matters will take the time to answer. Perhaps more people
than myself have similar questions.

I. Am I right that in Nova Roma, women are encouraged to adopt three
names ('tria nomina') exactly as men, and that these are then used in
the same way as male names (except for being grammatically female)?
Based on this supposition, I will use a male name as an example
below, expecting that a woman could just substitute a female name.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. (I'll return to Ancient Roman female
names at the end of the post.)

II. Both when perusing the Nova Roma website, and when reading books
about Ancient Rome, I find it confusing that there seem to be no
clear rules for which part of a name to use when the whole name isn't
stated. What name would a close friend use? When? A father, mother,
sister or brother? How should a business associate be referred to? Et
cetera.

To be more concrete, when would the following combinations be
appropriate? (I hope the illustrious Horace will forgive me for using
his name.)

Quintus Horatius Flaccus?
Quintus?
Quintus Horatius?
Horatius?
Horatius Flaccus?
Flaccus?

(Even in the excellent Essential Latin section, there seems to be
some confusion: In the example 'Apollonius Sullae suo S.P.D.' it
seems as if the sender uses his own nomen, but the cognomen of the
recipient. Is that standard practice?)

III. I don't think I've seen anything about it on the website, but I
believe that it was standard practice in Ancient Rome that women kept
their `maiden' names as married, and did not take their husbands
names. Is that the same in Nova Roma? Does that mean that a married
couple (who presumably wish to be considered married also under
Novoroman law) should NOT choose similar names? Or should they at
least share the same gens (clan)?

IV. Now, suppose that Quintus Horatius Flaccus and Lucia Iulia Amanda
are married. After some years, they get four children, two girls and
two boys. What should the children be named? I guess they should take
the nomen of their father (`Horatius'), but what else? Lex equitia de
familia seems to suggest that both nomen and cognomen of the father
should be passed on to the children (in female for for the girls, I
suppose).

V. Is it true that gens (clan) is defined by the nomen, and domus
(house/lineage) by nomen+cognomen, whereas there is no indication of
familia (family) in the name? Given the shortage of praenomina, I
suppose that you will soon end up with many people sharing the same
three names in more prolific lineages.

VI. In Ancient Rome, it seems that most women were not referred to
with a full three-name name (tria nomina). Was that indeed the case?
Did they only have praenomen+nomen without cognomen? Or is it just
that the less public role of women in Ancient Rome meant that there
was seldom a need to state the full name of women, since they would
usually be mentioned in more `familiar' settings? And public women,
probably often were very public, such as the empress. In our time,
John Smith refers to his wife as Elizabeth and the English Queen as
Queen Elizabeth, and not Elizabeth Smith and Elizabeth Alexandra Mary
Windsor, respectively, even though the latter is technically correct.
Perhaps the Romans did the same? After all, men were often also
referred to with only parts of their names.

Many thanks in advance!

Valete,

Hugo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34717 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
G. Equitius Cato Hugo S.P.D.

Salve Hugo!

Regarding Roman nomenclature use, here's a very general overview, as I
understand it:

When speaking to an acquaintance/equal citizen of PLEBEIAN Class, it
is proper to use their nomen and cognomen. I.E., Gaius Modius
Athanasios would be called "Modius Athanasios", as he is an
acquaintance of mine and is of a Plebeian gens.

When speaking to an acquaintance/equal citizen of PATRICIAN Class,
it is proper to use their praenomen and cognomen. I.E., Gnaeus
Iulius Caesar would be called "Gnaeus Caesar", as he is an
acquaintance and is of a Patrician gens.

When speaking to an acquaintance of either Class who has an agnomen
(fourth name), it is acceptable to use their cognomen and agnomen.
I.E., Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix could be called "Sulla Felix", or
Servius Equitius Mercurius Troianus could be called "Mercurius
Troianus".

Once you've gotten familiar and/or friendly with certain citizens,
it is considered acceptable to use the part of their name which most
people recognize; the part that stands out in particular. I.E.,
most people here in the Forum refer to me simply as "Cato", because
that is the part of my name which stands out, as I might refer to
Mercurius Troianus as simply "Troianus".

It is almost never acceptable to refer to a citizen by their
praenomen alone in public; a singular exception might be at a
funeral oration by a family member or particularly close friend.

When addressing someone (any citizen of either Class) in a
letter/post, it is proper to use their praenomen's initial, followed
by their nomen and cognomen (and agnomen, if one exists) in the
proper form. I.E., when I greet Lucius Fidelius Graecus in a letter, I
call him "L. Fidelio Graeco" --- in general, a "us" ending changes to
"o" and an "a" ending changes to "ae" as in "F. Tulliae Scholasticae"
for Flavia Tullia Scholastica.

In public a magistrate is almost invariably referred to with their
title. I.E., Gnaeus Equitius Marinus is referred to as "Censor
Marinus" during his term of office.

I think these are the very basics. There are many other subtle
intricacies based on family history, achievement, etc., but for the
most part they are not observed as the res publica is only 6 years
old :-)

Hope this helps!

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34720 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Salve Hugo, et salvete omnes,

romanman66 wrote:

> I. Am I right that in Nova Roma, women are encouraged to adopt three
> names ('tria nomina') exactly as men, and that these are then used in
> the same way as male names (except for being grammatically female)?

Yes, that's correct.

> II. Both when perusing the Nova Roma website, and when reading books
> about Ancient Rome, I find it confusing that there seem to be no
> clear rules for which part of a name to use when the whole name isn't
> stated.

Cato has already answered this quite comprehensively, so I'm going to
leave this one alone and refer you to his answer.


> III. I don't think I've seen anything about it on the website, but I
> believe that it was standard practice in Ancient Rome that women kept
> their `maiden' names as married, and did not take their husbands
> names.

Yes, that is correct.

> Is that the same in Nova Roma?

Mostly. We do have some married couples who have the same nomen, simply
because they weren't aware of the practices of antiquity when they took
their names. It would be unnecessarily cruel to insist that these
people change their names. But we try to make sure that newer citizens
understand that a Roman woman would not have taken her husband's family
name upon marriage.

> Does that mean that a married
> couple (who presumably wish to be considered married also under
> Novoroman law)

They either are married or they aren't. It's mostly up to them. The
Lex Equitia de Familia simply codifies what constitutes marriage in its
several different types.

> should NOT choose similar names?

Yes, that is correct.

> Or should they at least share the same gens (clan)?

No, that's not necessary. Connubium (the ability to marry) can exist
between cousins, but it also obviously exists between people with no
common ancestry at all.

> IV. Now, suppose that Quintus Horatius Flaccus and Lucia Iulia Amanda
> are married. After some years, they get four children, two girls and
> two boys. What should the children be named?

[praenomen] Horatius Flaccus for the sons
[praenomen] Horatia Flacca for the daughters

> V. Is it true that gens (clan) is defined by the nomen,

Yes.

> and domus (house/lineage) by nomen+cognomen,

Yes, that is correct.

> whereas there is no indication of familia (family) in the name?

That's also correct, in the sense of the immediate family, nothing is
going to distinguish my brother's family from mine, other than the
choice of praenomena we give our children.

> Given the shortage of praenomina, I
> suppose that you will soon end up with many people sharing the same
> three names in more prolific lineages.

Yes, just as the Romans of antiquity did.

> VI. In Ancient Rome, it seems that most women were not referred to
> with a full three-name name (tria nomina). Was that indeed the case?

Yes, that is correct. Throughout most of the Republic women had only
their father's nomen in feminized form: Aurelia, Hortensia, Flavia,
Iulia. If there were two daughters in the same family, they were
distinguished from each other by some agnomen, such as prima, secunda,
maior, minor, etc... During the Principate women began to have two and
three part names as a matter of course.

> Did they only have praenomen+nomen without cognomen?

In antiquity the girls had neither praenomina nor cognomina. Their
names were made up of nomina, agnomina, and occassionally a filation.

Here in Nova Roma we have chosen to have tripartate names for women
because we have chosen to have the women be equal members of our
society. In Roma Antiqua women did not have tripartate names, but they
didn't vote or run for public office either. Our new republic
recognizes this difference, and while we seek to have all of our
citizens using historically accurate names, we also ask the women of
Nova Roma to take tripartate names.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34721 From: Marcus Audens Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: "Aquila" -- March Issue
Citizens of Nova Roma;

I come before you to announce the production and issue of the March, 2005 issue of "Aquila", the Nova Roma Newsletter.

The newsletter is published monthly. Deadline date for submitted articles desiring inclusion in that month is the 20th of each month that the newsletter is issued. Issue date of the completed newsletter is sometime after the last day of the month.

Articles by Nova Roma Citizens are encouraged. Religious articles will be reviewed by the Religious Editor for suitability. Political material is not recommended.

Citizens, this is your newsletter, not mine. It is yours to support. The stories, poems, and articles donated to your various Sodalitas, could well be shared by all Nova Romans, if you will be so kind as to send that material to me as well as to your favorite people and places.

I look forward to your very kind submissions on any Ancient Roman Cultural Topic or question If in fact, you have a question, the question probably is a question in the minds of other citizens as well. Send your questions to me at "Aquila" (address above) and I will be pleased to research the answer myself, or ask those within Nova Roma who have a better historical knowledge than myself for the answers.

In Service to the Citizens of Nova Roma;

Very Respectfully;

Marcus Minucius-Tiberius Audens, Editor Commentarium -- Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34722 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Salve!

Scribae in my Cohors have found recent research done in Finland, as
well as in other places, about the name practise in the republican
period. This research indicates that there were actually many females
that had the tria nomina, but it also indicates that they seldom were
used, at least in written history.

> > Did they only have praenomen+nomen without cognomen?
>
>In antiquity the girls had neither praenomina nor cognomina. Their
>names were made up of nomina, agnomina, and occassionally a filation.
>
>Here in Nova Roma we have chosen to have tripartate names for women
>because we have chosen to have the women be equal members of our
>society. In Roma Antiqua women did not have tripartate names, but they
>didn't vote or run for public office either. Our new republic
>recognizes this difference, and while we seek to have all of our
>citizens using historically accurate names, we also ask the women of
>Nova Roma to take tripartate names.
>
>Vale,
>
>-- Marinus

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus

Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34723 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: LUDI MEGALENSES - Cert. Historicum SOLUTION - No7
SOLUTION OF THE LAST QUESTION.
Thank you all for your participation!!:-)

CN CORNELIUS LENTULUS QUIRITIBUS MULTAM SALUTEM:

Here follows the correct answer for the 7th and last
question of our Certamen. (The final classifications
are in an extra e-mail!)

THE SOLUTION No7

QUAESTIO N°7 – (1) When could Roman citizens become
priests of Magna Mater at first time in history of
Mother Goddess being worshipped in Rome? (2) Who was
the emperor who prohibited Roman priests of Cybele
from castrating themselves?

RESPONSUM N°7 – (1) Under the reign of Emperor
Claudius, in 45 C.E., there was for the first time in
Rome when all restrictions on Roman citizens wishing
to dedicate themselves to the service of Cybele were
removed.
(2)Emperor Domitian was who prohibited priest of
Cybele with Roman citizenship from castrating
themselves.


The contest is done.

And now I invite you to see The Final Certifications
for Certamen Historicum of Aedilis L. Iulius Sulla!


VALETE QVAM OPTIME!

Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
Scriba Ludorum - Aed. L. Iulii Sullae
Undecimvir ad Diploma Sodalitatis Latinitatis Retractandum
Propraetor Pannoniae




__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34724 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Certamen Historicum MEGALESIAE - FINAL CLASSIFICATION!!!
FINAL CLASSIFICATION:
the winner is JULILLA SEMPRONIA MAGNA!!! She is the
most studious historian of Nova Roma with this
contest! :-)
We wish to thank all the studious partecipants and
hope you have enjoyed the contest!


CN CORNELIUS LENTULUS QUIRITIBUS SPD:

Here follows The Final Classification for our Certamen
Historicum. It was a hard struggle: I 'd like to
appreciate all contestants. But now I shuold announce
the winner is Julilla Sempronia Magna!
CONGRATULATIONS!
The second best by this contest is Flavia Tullia
Scholastica; the third best is Cn. Equitius Marinus:
CONGRATULATIONS TOO!!


THE FINAL CLASSIFICATION of the Magna Mater - contest


1. Iulilla Sempronia Magna 14 pts
2. Flavia Tullia Valeria Scholastica 12 pts
3. Cn. Equitius Marinus 7 pts

and:

4. C. Equitius Cato 6 pts
4. Marca Hortensia Maior 6 pts
5. P. Memmius Albucius 4 pts
6. Iulia Cybele 2 pts

We wish to thank all the studious partecipants!!!

(The rules of Certamen Historicum:
http://www.cohorssullana.grafosystem.ro/rules.htm)


VALETE QVAM OPTIME!

Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
Scriba Ludorum - Aed. L. Iulii Sullae
Undecimvir ad Diploma Sodalitatis Latinitatis Retractandum
Propraetor Pannoniae


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34725 From: Salix Cantaber Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: LUDI MEGALENSES - Chariot races - FINAL
This evening has celebrated the great End of the Equestrian Games in the Circus

They have converged three chariots of the factio Praesina (Green) and a chariot of the Factio Veneta (Blue).

Quadriga: Stella Iudaeae
Charioteer: Herodias
Factio: Praesina
Domina: Marca hortensia Maior

Quadriga: Velox Puteulanus Sors
Aurigator: Félix Celeris
Factio: Veneta
Dominus: Lucius Vitellius Triarius

Quadriga: Delecta Mea
Aurigator: Crescens
Factio: Praesina
It dominates: Julilla Sempronia Magna

Quadriga: Inexpugnabilis III
Aurigator: Euthymus
Factio: Praesina
Dominus: Caius Curius Saturninus

The races has been touching and the winner is...







(...)




1st - INEXPUGNABILIS III and EUTHYMUS for the factio PRAESINA

2nd - Velox Puteulanus Sors and Felix Celeris for factio VENETA

3th - Stella Iudaeae and Herodias fror factio PRAESINA

4th - Delecta Mea and Crescens for factio PRAESINA


FELICITER CAII CURI SAURNI !

PELIX POPULUS PRAESINI !


Thanks to all the participants. I hope to see you and their teams in the next Games


Valete optime.

Q. Salix Cantaber Uranicus

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34726 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Ludi Megalenses - the end (almost)
L IUL SULLA QUIRITIBUS S.D.

Avete Quirites!

The sun is going down in this very special day, when Megalesia are
going to finish.
Here the last rays of light are all for the statue of our Goddess
Magna Mater that stands in front of the temple that was dedicated in
191 b.c.e..
I hope that she appreciated all our devotion and care for her glory
during these 7 days of racings, contests, bravery, prays and
banquets. I hope that all the roman citizens have enjoyed our
activities.
Now, as the last sunshine is going to leave us, when from the
Capitolium is moving the last parade of our divinities, that our
last festival begins! One more time, my wine cellars will open for
Populus Romanus; nunc est bibendus, nunc pede libero! Now it's the
time for wine Albanus 10 yrs. and Falernus 15 yrs. aged!
Glory for Magna Mater, I say, and gratitude for my Cohors.
Gratitude mostly for Iulius Sabinus, Cornelius Lentulus, Pompeia
Minucia Tiberia, Hortensia Maior and Salix Cantaber. Without you,
guys, these Ludi couldn't exist.

Now, Cives, if you enjoyed our Ludi, please remember that our
project of spreading and restoration of the Temple of Magna Mater in
Rome lives thanks to your donations. If you want to donate, please
contact me or my Questor Rutilius Minervalis.

OPTIME VALETE!
L IUL SULLA
Aedilis Curulis
Italia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34727 From: asregulus@bellsouth.net Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Congradulations I. Sempronia Magna!
Salve, et salvete,

Congradulations Iulilla Sempronia Magna!

I guess your brother will have to cook up
something special and share it on the NR
cooking list.


Vale, et Valete bene in pacem deorum,

Aulus Sempronius Regulus
MMDCCLVIII Anno urbis conditae (AUC)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34728 From: Maior Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Certamen Historicum MEGALESIAE - FINAL CLASSIFICATION!!!
Salvete;
Congratulations Julilla you are the wisest of us all! But the scent
of historical competition is upon me and with such worthy foes as
Flavia Tullia, Consul Marinus and Cato I can't wait to win next year;-
)...
optime vale
Marca Hortensia Maior

But now I shuold announce
> the winner is Julilla Sempronia Magna!
> CONGRATULATIONS!
> The second best by this contest is Flavia Tullia
> Scholastica; the third best is Cn. Equitius Marinus:
> CONGRATULATIONS TOO!!
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34729 From: Julilla Sempronia Magna Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Congradulations I. Sempronia Magna!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, <asregulus@b...> wrote:
> Salve, et salvete,
>
> Congradulations Iulilla Sempronia Magna!
>
> I guess your brother will have to cook up
> something special and share it on the NR
> cooking list.
>
>
> Vale, et Valete bene in pacem deorum,
>
> Aulus Sempronius Regulus
> MMDCCLVIII Anno urbis conditae (AUC)

Gratias multas, that would indeed be a treat. My heartiest thanks
and appreciation to the Cohors Aediles for a challenging and
edifying Megalesia -- most satisfying indeed!

valete,

Julilla Sempronia Magna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34730 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Certamen Historicum MEGALESIAE - FINAL CLASSIFICATION!!!
Flavia Tullia Scholastica Marcae Hortensiae Maiori quiritibus, sociis,
peregrinisque omnibus S.P.D.

> Salvete;
> Congratulations Julilla you are the wisest of us all! But the scent
> of historical competition is upon me and with such worthy foes as
> Flavia Tullia, Consul Marinus and Cato I can't wait to win next year;-
> )...
> optime vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>

Indeed, congratulations are in order for Julilla--but she (and others)
should watch out, for next year my ISP might not go down, or experience
severe difficulties, in the middle of a contest, thus preventing the
necessary communication. . .

Congratulations, Julilla!

> But now I shuold announce
>> the winner is Julilla Sempronia Magna!
>> CONGRATULATIONS!
>> The second best by this contest is Flavia Tullia
>> Scholastica; the third best is Cn. Equitius Marinus:
>> CONGRATULATIONS TOO!!
>>
>>
>>
>
Vale, et valete,

Flavia Tullia Scholastica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34731 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Salve,

They are more like a security force than an acutal standing army. I
went to the Vatican website to see if I could find exact numbers, but
couldn't find the exact numbers if its even stated there. However I
can't imagine there being more than a two or even three hundred Swiss
Guards actually on "active duty" at any given time.

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@y...>
wrote:
> Perhaps I am mistaken, but the Swiss Guard is
> recognized as a standing army, is it not? Are they not
> like modern day Praetorians?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34732 From: Julilla Sempronia Magna Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Certamen Historicum MEGALESIAE - FINAL CLASSIFICATION!!!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Flavia Scholastica <fororom@l...>
wrote:
> Flavia Tullia Scholastica Marcae Hortensiae Maiori quiritibus,
sociis, peregrinisque omnibus S.P.D.
>
>
> Indeed, congratulations are in order for Julilla--but she (and
others) should watch out, for next year my ISP might not go down, or
experience severe difficulties, in the middle of a contest, thus
preventing the necessary communication. . .
>
> Congratulations, Julilla!

Et felicitatio, Flavia Tullia -- I fully expected to divide the
laurels with you. It must have been extremely frustrating to have
that hiccup in the ether -- and in the midst of a contest too!

--

Julilla Sempronia Magna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34733 From: Triarius Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Thanks for the Ludi !
(Triarius enters the Forum, followed by an elaborately decorated
wagon filled with large casks of wine, fruit, desserts and good
cheer, celebrating the Munera Gladiatoria victory and Circenses 2nd
Place Finish of the Ludi gamesÂ…a crowd gathers to investigate the
commotion...)

Salvete!

I would like to take this time to personally thank those Cives whose
brave and noble gladiators fought well in the Munera Gladiatoria and
Ludi Circenses games against my Champion Secutor, Superstes, and the
other guy, Bestius, that I fed to the lions for losing against
Praetor Faustus, and Felix Celeris, the driver of my Factio Veneta
Chariot Velox Puteulanus Sors!

(Triarius salutes his competitors in the Ludi...)

First, I salute Iulius Perusianus and Tenax, his Retiarius!

Second, I salute Lucius Arminius Faustus and the late Memius
Rododactilos, his Thraex (who triumphed over Bestius in the Munera
Gladiatoria Quarter-Finals, but was overcome by Superstes in the Semi-
Finals), and Aristeus Atrox, driver of his Chariot Celer Furiousqve!

Third, I salute Hortensia Maior and Achillea, her Retriarix, and
Herodias, driver of her Chariot Stella Iudaeae!

Fourth, I salute Caius Curius Saturninus and Master Webmaster, his
Retiarius, and Euthymus, driver of his Chariot Inexpugnabilis III!

Fifth, I salute Iulilla Sempronia Magna, and Crescens, driver of her
Chariot Delecta Mea

Finally, I salute Gnaeus Equitius Marinus and Petronius Gnipho,
driver of his Chariot Vita Brevis!

(Triarius reaches in a box in the back of the wagon and pulls out a
dozen scrolls, six labeled "Fighting Secutors for Dummies" and six
labeled "The Dummies Guide to Factio Veneta"...Triarius happily
presents each honoree with one of each of the scrolls...)

May each of you excel in future games against the teams of the Domus
of Triarius!!!

VALETE CIVES NOVAROMANI!

(Triarius fills everyone's cup, distributes platters of food amongst
the crowd, passes out complimentary bottles of his own Vitellian
Garum to everyone and continues on through the Forum spreading good
cheer and enjoying the festivities of the Ludi with his entourage...)

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Lucius Vitellius Triarius
Plebian, Magna Flumen Regio, America Austrorientalis
http://www.angelfire.com/empire2/vitellia/
Owner, Factio Veneta Chariot "Velox Puteulanus Sors"
2nd Place - MEGALENSES Ludi Circenses
Owner of the Gladiator Superstes, winner of the
Munera Gladiatoria, LUDI MEGALENSES MMDCCLVIII
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Quam bene vivas refert, non quam diu."
"The important thing isn't how long you live,
but how well you live" - L. Annaeus Seneca
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Tired of High Gas Prices and Emissions Problems?
http://www.myenergycel.com/emissions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34734 From: David Wallace Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Salve, et salvete,

I found these totals after a quick googling:

http://ch.c-d.org/ch/culture_swissguard.html

"The Swiss Guard currently consists of a total of 100 men: 4 officials, 1
chaplain, 23 noncommissioned officers, 70 halbardiers, and 2 drummers. "

Vale, et valete,

M. Cassius Peregrinus (pending acceptance)

_____

From: quintuscassiuscalvus [mailto:richmal@...]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 7:31 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus



Salve,

They are more like a security force than an acutal standing army. I
went to the Vatican website to see if I could find exact numbers, but
couldn't find the exact numbers if its even stated there. However I
can't imagine there being more than a two or even three hundred Swiss
Guards actually on "active duty" at any given time.

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@y...>
wrote:
> Perhaps I am mistaken, but the Swiss Guard is
> recognized as a standing army, is it not? Are they not
> like modern day Praetorians?






_____

Yahoo! Groups Links


* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/


* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>


* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34735 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Thanks for the Ludi !
Salvete Quirites, et salve Triari,

Triarius wrote:

> Finally, I salute Gnaeus Equitius Marinus and Petronius Gnipho,
> driver of his Chariot Vita Brevis!

Thank you. Petro thanks you for the wine, which he's guzzling even now.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34736 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Certamen Historicum MEGALESIAE - FINAL CLASSIFICATION!!!
G. Equitius Cato I. Semproniae Magnae quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve Sempronia Magna et salvete omnes!

Well done and congratulations! Maybe next year I'LL fight in the
arena and let the tiger answer the questions :-)

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34737 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Certamen Historicum MEGALESIAE - FINAL CLASSIFICATION!!!
Flavia Tullia Scholastica Julillae Semproniae Magnae quiritibus, sociis,
peregrinisque omnibus S.P.D.

> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Flavia Scholastica <fororom@l...>
> wrote:
>> Flavia Tullia Scholastica Marcae Hortensiae Maiori quiritibus,
> sociis, peregrinisque omnibus S.P.D.
>>
>>
>> Indeed, congratulations are in order for Julilla--but she (and
> others) should watch out, for next year my ISP might not go down, or
> experience severe difficulties, in the middle of a contest, thus
> preventing the necessary communication. . .
>>
>> Congratulations, Julilla!
>
> Et felicitatio, Flavia Tullia -- I fully expected to divide the
> laurels with you. It must have been extremely frustrating to have
> that hiccup in the ether -- and in the midst of a contest too!
>
Plurimas gratias! It was more than a hiccup, but only in my area
code--the e-mail was extremely slow and intermittent (more often
nonexistent), and web access nearly impossible. Occasionally, I could
access the web but not much else--to take one example, once in a while I
could read the messages for moderation onsite, but the system wouldn't
acknowledge my approval or rejection of same, and access was extremely slow
and spotty. Frustrating is such a gentle word for my thoughts on this. .
.we're all in an internet-dependent organization whose delicate electronic
bonds are all too frail.

As Lentulus knows, I hadn't really planned on entering this (or any
other) contest--I'm not the competitive sort, but got lucky with the first
few answers, and thought I'd try it anyway. Trust you know I was teasing
about next year. . .


>
> Julilla Sempronia Magna
>
>
Vale, et valete,

Flavia Tullia Scholastica


>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34738 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-04-10
Subject: Re: Ludi Megalenses - the end (almost)
G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.

Salvete omnes!

A most hearty round of applause (and good Falernian) to the Aediles
and their cohors for a resoundingly good set of Games! L. Iulius
Sulla, Q. Salix Cantaber Uranicus, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, M.
Constantinvs Serapio, Iulius Sabinus, P. Minucia-Tiberia Strabo, you
have all done a magnificent job!

Even if I lost EVERYTHING.

Not to sound bitter or anything.

<Cato blows his nose, wipes away a tear, and stands to recite>

IN MEMORIAM SCYLLAE

Higgledy-piggledy
Great Mother's ludi
Where Cato's great Scylla
Once fought at his best;
Stirring the crowds with an
Ampitheatrically
Ravenous tiger
Who ate all the rest.

Well, he didn't really, but he's dead now so give him a little
benefit?

Valete bene, and again, congratulations on an excellent set of ludi!

Cato
Not Bitter That He Has To Buy a New Set of Ferocious Beasts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34739 From: Maxima Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Salve

philipp.hanenberg@... wrote:

<<The next one is this impressive funural went back to an old tradition in the roman catholic church the sign of peace before you get your comunion. This wasn't done since a long time.>>


I don't know about the rest of the world, but in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, they give the sign of peace in every Mass. It was nice to see them do it in the Papal funeral Mass. His Holiness, John Paul II, would have approved.


<<Extraordinary was also the present of the whole religious leaders and this was also one of the very_very few moments the political leaders were so quiet and silent you can count it on one hand such happened before. You could see definetly that traditions, thousands of yrs old can bring them to shut up.>>


It was nothing short of shocking! Then to see heads of state, from countries that consider each other as enemies, actually shake hands.....well, I was just glad I was sitting down.


<<Another impressive thing were the people who cry "Santo subito"
Vox populi, vox dei
They want to see JP II to become holy.
That's not so easy since some decades but the roman catholic church showed the world what they are!
And it is also an importand point when the collegium decides about to speak pope JP II "holy"
Not just wonders only. But it will need a minimum of 2 yrs.>>


I suspect the Church will wait for a few years before making any decisions. It will be interesting to see how the possible canonization of Pope John Paul II progresses.


<<But one of the most impressive facts are the youngsters who came in masses to be with "their" pope.
It was a perfect sign to all that young ppl are looking for a moral leadership also if they don't agree with all pope JP II said.>>


I agree with you, completely. I think the young people of the world are so hungry for moral guidance, that even though they may not have agreed with everything Pope John Paul II said, they love that he reached out to them.

<<As a side note: I switched between CNN and Eurpean TV stations and have to say CNN cut a lot and had a time different of some seconds :)
Well and sometimes they used to look around with their cameras while the others were still focused on St. Peter's Square>>

I, myself, watched the BBC's coverage of the funeral, but one of the Spanish language stations also had very good coverage, and continous coverage from the moment it was announced the Pope was dying to the evening of the day of the Pope's funeral. It made me glad I know Spanish so I could follow along. I know French and Italian, too, but the BBC is the only European station on regular TV.

Bene vale

Maxima Valeria Messallina


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34740 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: Re: Ludi Megalenses - the end (almost)
SERAPIO CN EQVITO CATO OMNESQVE SPD

> A most hearty round of applause (and good Falernian) to the Aediles
> and their cohors for a resoundingly good set of Games! L. Iulius
> Sulla, Q. Salix Cantaber Uranicus, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, M.
> Constantinvs Serapio, Iulius Sabinus, P. Minucia-Tiberia Strabo,
you
> have all done a magnificent job!

Don't thank me for the Ludi Megalesia as in Sulla's cohors I'm not
involved in the games :-)
On the contrary, I'm responsible for the games which will start
tomorrow (Ludi Ceriales) ;-)

By the way, my congratulation to Aedilis Sulla and his Cohors on
these Ludi!

OPTIME VALE
M'C.Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34741 From: Maxima Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Salve, Lucius Iulius Sulla

Thank you for sharing your experiences. It's wonderful to hear from someone who was actually there. All Italians should be proud. What a wonderful example, put before the whole world, of just how well large events can be done.
Let's hope it set a precedent.

Bene vale

Maxima Valeria Messallina


Lucius Iulius <21aprile@...> wrote:

SALVETE CIVES

I come into this discussion just to give my testimony about the perfect organization of all the ceremonies and corollary organized after the death of Pope Ioannes Paulus II, as I was there as a volunteer MD for the assistance of the pilgrims arrived to Rome.
I had never participated to such a big event in my life before, and I was really impressed by the huge number of persons arrived in Rome: all the ages and races were there represented, and I was happy to be there.But what did astonished me was the organization of the all event: everywhere in Rome there was someone (volunteer or policeman or whatever) who could give you any needed informations or free water. All the streets of Vatican City and the part of Rome around were "presidiated" by forces that showed you where to go and what to do. Hundreds of doctors and paramedics where in the strategic points.
E.g., for me to get into S. Peter's square, I had to pass 8 (eight)control posts where I had to show my documents and pass (even if I had my coat of MD)...
With an exceptional organization and a big amount of luck, nothing happened during these exceptional days!

VALETE
L IUL SULLA
Aedilis Curulis
Italia

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34742 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
>
> <<The next one is this impressive funural went back to an old
tradition in the roman catholic church the sign of peace before you
get your comunion. This wasn't done since a long time.>>
>
>
> I don't know about the rest of the world, but in the U.S., Canada,
and Mexico, they give the sign of peace in every Mass. It was nice
to see them do it in the Papal funeral Mass. His Holiness, John Paul
II, would have approved.
>
>
Salvete omnes,

That is correct about the sign of peace but it is done all over the
world from what I understand. Now I go to a Latin American church in
Edmonton also. At that sign of peace you also get a kiss and a hug
often from the senoritas. I found that a little stange at first but
you can be sure old Quintus is not going to complain about that!
LOL, similarily at the Our Father, prior to communion you have to
hold hands with the person on each side of you as the prayer is
said. More often than not I try to make sure there are females on
either side. Ah well, such are cultural differences.

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34743 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: [Fwd: Roman Legions book release and author presentations]
Salvete Quirites,

The following message was sent to the group owners. I see nothing
objectionable about it, and am therefore passing it along to you.

Valete,

-- Marinus

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Roman Legions book release and author presentations
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 17:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sarah Stephan <sarahs@...>
To: Nova-Roma-owner@yahoogroups.com


Dear Nova Roma Forum Owner,

Thank you for your forum and the service you provide for your members. I
wanted to let you know about a new book release I think your members will
find of particular interest.

Major Tony Clunn, discoverer of the Varus battlefield in Germany, will be
in the United States for a speaking tour in late April/early May. His trip
coincides with the release of his book, The Quest for the Lost Roman
Legions: Discovering the Varus Battlefield.

In 9 A.D., three Roman legions under Varus were slaughtered in a
well-planned ambush by German troops led by Arminius (also known as
Hermann). The Quest for the Lost Roman Legions describes author Tony
Clunn’s hunt for and discovery of one of the western world’s most
important battles. You can read an excerpt from the book, an interview
with the author, and view the travel schedule on our website here
http://www.savasbeatie.com/LostRomanLegions.html

Originally from England, Major Clunn now lives in Germany, just miles from
the battlefield he discovered. As you can imagine, his discovery and its
implications are fascinating, culturally, historically, and
archeologically speaking.

Major Clunn will be speaking at many colleges and bookstores throughout
the United States. He will also give presentations to German-American and
Roman reenactment groups. You can view the travel schedule directly here
http://www.savasbeatie.com/ClunnSchedule.html

I would appreciate your sharing this information with anyone who you think
would be interested. Perhaps you could even post the link to the book
information and travel schedule in your forum. Seeing a presentation by
Major Clunn will be a neat experience.

Thank you for your time. If you have any questions or would like any more
information, please let me know.

Best,
Sarah Stephan

Savas Beatie LLC
P.O. Box 4527
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
www.savasbeatie.com
Voice: 916.941.6896 (9-5, Pacific Standard Time)
Fax: 916.941.6895
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34744 From: Marcus Audens Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: "Aquila" (Eagle)
New Citizens of Nova Roma;

Several of you have asked if I would again list the access codes (URLs) to past newsletters. I am pleased to do so:

For the three 2005 issues of "Aquila"go to:

www.novaroma.org/aquila

You will immediately see the masthead and sidebar of the "Aquila" newsletter. At the bottom of the sidebar, there is an archive link which will take you to the 2005 past issues.

For the 2004 past issues of "Eagle" go to:

http://livinghistoryengineer.com/roman/eagle/index/htm

Please enjoy these issues as they are your newsletters as Citizens of Nova Roma. You are free to contrtibute to the newsletters as you desire and under the instructions listed earlier on this net.

Very Respectfully;

Marcus Minucius-Tiberius Audens -- Editor Commentarium -- Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34745 From: pjtuloup@yahoo.fr Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: Re: hi
I have received your document. The corrected document is attached.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34746 From: Simon Larente Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: Re: hi
Is that a spam?

pjtuloup@... wrote:I have received your document. The corrected document is attached.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




---------------------------------
Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos mails !
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34747 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: Re: hi
Salvete Quirites,

Simon Larente wrote:

> Is that a spam?

No, it's a blank e-mail that had an attachment stripped from it,
probably sent by a virus that infested someone's computer.

> pjtuloup@... wrote:I have received your document. [...]

This is one of the reasons we have the mailing list set to strip away
any attachments, because of the way that viruses tend to propogate
themselves in attachments.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34748 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: Re: Ludi Megalenses - the end (almost)
SALVE GN EQUITI CATO!

Thank you for your words, I hope you had a good time!

> have all done a magnificent job!

> Even if I lost EVERYTHING.

For this reason rivers of wine are all around here!

> Well, he didn't really, but he's dead now so give him a little
> benefit?

He'll got an epitaph in my future Forum, trust me! ;-)

BENE VALE
L IUL SULLA


> Valete bene, and again, congratulations on an excellent set of
ludi!
>
> Cato
> Not Bitter That He Has To Buy a New Set of Ferocious Beasts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34749 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-04-11
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
A. Apollonius Cordus Hugoni omnibusque sal.

Welcome to our community, and good luck with your
application for citizenship (if you do apply).

The censores have answered most of your questions
pretty thoroughly, but I'm afraid my friend C.
Equitius has given you a slightly confused answer to
question II. Let me try to give you a better one:

> II. Both when perusing the Nova Roma website, and
> when reading books
> about Ancient Rome, I find it confusing that there
> seem to be no
> clear rules for which part of a name to use when the
> whole name isn't
> stated. What name would a close friend use? When? A
> father, mother,
> sister or brother? How should a business associate
> be referred to? Et
> cetera.

The first question is how many names to use. The
general rule is that more names are more formal. So to
address someone formally, use at least three of his
names. If he has more than three and you only want to
use three, use the praenomen, the nomen, and one of
the cognomina. Which cognomen? I'll come back to that
later. Using three or more names is really very
formal, roughly the equivalent of "Dr. T. P. Wiseman".

Addressing someone by two names is still moderately
formal; the equivalent, perhaps, of "Dr. Wiseman" or
"Peter Wiseman". In the senate people were usually
called by two names, and the senate was a pretty
formal place. In informal circumstances on would use
just a single name.

The number of names you use also depends on whether
there's any danger of confusion. Often you would call
someone by two or three names when first referring to
him but later drop into using one name.

Which names? Well, if you're using just a single name,
you almost always use the cognomen. [N.B.: the Nova
Roma website, and various leges, use the word
"agnomen" to mean "any name in addition to the normal
three". This isn't correct, and the rogatores are
working on correcting the mistake. An agnomen is an
extra name which is conferred as a personal honour.
Any other type of fourth, fifth, sixth... name is a
cognomen, like the third one.]

The cognomen was historically associated with nobles.
A noble ("nobilis") was (probably) someone descended
from a curule magistrate (curule aedile, praetor,
consul, censor, dictator, magister equitum). So a
noble will expect always to be addressed by his
cognomen. If you're talking to (or about) a non-noble,
you can be polite by using the cognomen, but if you
want to make a point of his non-nobility you could use
his nomen. It wouldn't be exactly rude, but it would
put him in his place!

The praenomen is a very informal and private name. If
you call someone by one name only, it will never be
the praenomen unless the person you're talking to (or
about) is your close relative, lover, or very close
friend. Otherwise it's pretty rude. But there are some
exceptions - when a person has a very rare praenomen,
such as Kaeso or Appius, it's more acceptable to use
it on its own. But to be safe, avoid calling anyone by
praenomen only.

If you use two names, it's a bit more complicated. For
most of the history of the republic, it worked like
this: praenomen + cognomen for nobles, praenomen +
nomen for non-nobles. Very late in the republic
(during the last generation) a new fashion developed
of calling everyone, noble and non-noble, by nomen +
cognomen or cognomen + nomen. I used to follow the
late fashion, but I now use the earlier practice since
it represents republican culture better.

Finally, if a person has several cognomina, which one
do you use? Well, you can use all of them of course,
but that would be more formal. The normal practice is
to use the first one, with the following exceptions:

Calling someone by an agnomen (an honorary name such
as Felix, Magnus, Maximus, Pius, Germanicus,
Britannicus, &c.) draws attention to the honour which
he received, and is therefore quite flattering.

Names ending in -ianus or -inus usually indicate that
a person has been adopted. So calling someone by that
name draws attention to the adoption. It's not
necessarily rude, because it's no shame to be adopted,
but you normally wouldn't do it unless you want to
make a point. So you might do it, for instance, to
emphasise the relationship or a person to his former
gens (since the adoptive cognomen is formed from the
old nomen).

So, to your specific examples:

> To be more concrete, when would the following
> combinations be
> appropriate? (I hope the illustrious Horace will
> forgive me for using
> his name.)
>
> Quintus Horatius Flaccus?

Formal, e.g. introducing yourself, making a very
formal declaration, &c. Or, if using all three names
is the only way to avoid confusion with another person
with a similar name.

> Quintus?

If you are his brother, father, wife, lover, &c.; or
if you're being rude to him.

> Quintus Horatius?

If you're being moderately formal and he's not a
nobilis.

> Horatius?

If you're being informal, he's not a nobilis, and you
don't want to go out of your way to be nice to him.

> Horatius Flaccus?

If you're using the late-republican fashion in a
moderately formal situation.

> Flaccus?

In normal, informal conversation, if he's a nobilis or
if you want to be nice to him by addressing him as if
he were one.

> (Even in the excellent Essential Latin section,
> there seems to be
> some confusion: In the example 'Apollonius Sullae
> suo S.P.D.' it
> seems as if the sender uses his own nomen, but the
> cognomen of the
> recipient. Is that standard practice?)

Presumably Apollonius here is a non-nobilis (as indeed
all the Apollonii are) and Sulla is a nobilis (e.g. L.
Cornelius Sulla).

Also, on the use of titles: what our Cato says about
"Censor Marinus" is true in Nova Roma, but is not at
all historical. The Roman very rarely addressed each
other by title. They did, however, quite commonly use
little epithets such as "Marinus meus" ("my Marinus",
i.e. "my friend Marinus") or "Marinus noster" ("our
Marinus"), or "clarissimus Marinus" ("very famous
Marinus"), or "Marinus mel" ("Marinus honey" - his
wife might call him this, but I probably wouldn't),
and so on.

> III. I don't think I've seen anything about it on
> the website, but I
> believe that it was standard practice in Ancient
> Rome that women kept
> their `maiden' names as married, and did not take
> their husbands
> names. Is that the same in Nova Roma? Does that mean
> that a married
> couple (who presumably wish to be considered married
> also under
> Novoroman law) should NOT choose similar names? Or
> should they at
> least share the same gens (clan)?

Just to add a little to Cn. Equitius' answer:
marriages within a gens seem to have been rare
(probably about as rare as marriages between people
with the same surname in the modern world), but were
not necessarily forbidden. People with the same nomen
but different cognomina were probably not very closely
related, and might indeed not be related at all, so
marriage between them wouldn't have been incest. Such
marriages may perhaps have been more common among the
lower classes than we know: among the aristocracy, of
course, marriages were often used to secure alliances
between different gentes, and so marriage within the
same gens was very rare.

> IV. Now, suppose that Quintus Horatius Flaccus and
> Lucia Iulia Amanda
> are married. After some years, they get four
> children, two girls and
> two boys. What should the children be named? I guess
> they should take
> the nomen of their father (`Horatius'), but what
> else? Lex equitia de
> familia seems to suggest that both nomen and
> cognomen of the father
> should be passed on to the children (in female for
> for the girls, I
> suppose).

That's right. Also it was usual for the eldest son to
take the same praenomen as the father; and many gentes
had certain praenomina which they used a lot and
others they never used. So you would pretty much
expect Q. Horatius Flaccus' eldest son to be called Q.
Horatius Flaccus (minor - *not* junior). Presumably in
Nova Roma this would apply to the eldest child, so if
the eldest child were a daughter she would be Q.
Horatia Flacca. But taking the father's praenomen
isn't compulsory.

> V. Is it true that gens (clan) is defined by the
> nomen, and domus
> (house/lineage) by nomen+cognomen, whereas there is
> no indication of
> familia (family) in the name? Given the shortage of
> praenomina, I
> suppose that you will soon end up with many people
> sharing the same
> three names in more prolific lineages.

Yup. That's not usually a problem, because normally
it'll be possible to work out who you mean from the
context. But when it gets very bad, different branches
of a given domus will tend to take extra cognomina to
distinguish them. The Cornelii Scipiones were a very
prolific lineage in the republic, so they accumulated
a lot of cognomina. The most famous one was Cornelius
Scipio Africanus. His agnomen, Africanus, was
honorific and wouldn't normally have been inherited,
but since there were so many other Scipiones it was
quite useful and it became hereditary. There were also
the Scipiones Nasicae; and indeed there were so many
of them that they acquired even more cognomina, e.g.
Cornelius Scipio Nasica Corculum.

But remember that a Roman's full name is more than
three names: it includes the name of his father, his
grandfather, and his tribe. Our consul of last year
signs himself Cn. Salvius T. f. A. n. Ouf. Astur
(Gnaeus Salvius Astur, son of Titus, grandson of
Aulus, of the tribe Oufetina).

In the late republic there were two famous cousins,
both politicians and lawyers, called Q. Mucius
Scaevola. One was an augur and one a pontifex, so
sometimes they were called Q. Scaevola Pontifex and Q.
Scaevola Augur. But their fathers were brothers, so
another common habit (which Cicero, who knew both men,
preferred) was to say Q. Scaevola P. f. and Q.
Scaevola Q. f.

I hope that gives you a fair idea of how it all works.
Roman names are very expressive, and can convey many
different implications; but remember that the Romans
were practical people and they were quite prepared to
bend the rules of etiquette in order to avoid confusion.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34750 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2005-04-12
Subject: Bibliographies and $$$ for NR
Salvete,



Since a couple of us are compiling bibliographies
for posts we have sent to various NR lists,

perhaps these sources could be added to the
NR-Amazon list? Doesn't NR get a % on books

purchased via those links?



Also, if the above is the case and a good idea, to
help the webmaster, is there a preferred

format to submit such titles.



Vale, et valete in pacem deorum

A. Sempronius Regulus

MMDCCLVIII A.U.C.







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34752 From: Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Date: 2005-04-12
Subject: Caution: Viruses
Salvete Omnes,

This Email address is mine: it seems that it is in the address book
of an user infected by a virus. (Concerning me, I am under linux and
my mail sent via Yahoo is automatically scanned by a antivirus). Be
Careful !

Valete !

Lucius Rutilius Minervalis
Aedilician Quaestor


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Simon Larente <slarente@y...> wrote:
> Is that a spam?
>
> pjtuloup@y... wrote:I have received your document. The corrected
document is attached.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage
pour vos mails !
> Créez votre Yahoo! Mail
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34753 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-12
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - subscribe the chariot races!
AVETE OMNES

The Ludi Ceriales start today and it's time for you to enlist your
chariot for the chariot races! You only have a few time!!!

The citizen who want to take part in the next chariot races must
send an e-mail to Quintus Salix Cantaber at qsalixcant@....
Deadline for subscription is Wednesday April 13th. Each subscription
must bear the subject header "Ceriales Ludi Circenses" and include
the following information:


A. His/her name in Nova Roma

B. The name of his/her driver

C. The name of his/her chariot

D. His/her tactics for the Quarter and Semifinals

E. His/her tactics for the Finals

F. The name of his/her "factio" or team (Albata, Praesina, Russata,
or Veneta)

G. Dirty actions against another factio in a specific round (quarter-
final,
semi-final, or final) and amount of sesterces paid in support of it
(an entrant
does not have to pay sesterces to commission a dirty action, but
doing so
increases the chances of success

H. Defence against dirty actions in a specific round (quarter-final,
semi-final,
or final) and amount of sesterces paid in support of it (an entrant
does not
have to pay sesterces to defend against a dirty action, but doing so
decreases
the chances of success of the dirty action)

I. If sesterces from multiple entrants are pooled to take a dirty
action or
defend against a dirty action, the subscription of each entrant of
the pool must
so indicate.

Come on Novaromani! Maybe you lost the Megalesia ludi circenses? You
might win the Cerealia!

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34754 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-12
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - Opening of the festival
AVETE CIVES NOVAE ROMAE

Today is the first day of the Ludi Ceriales, or Cerealia, the
festival of Ceres.
Ceres is the goddess of agricultural fertility in general and grain
in particular. According to Vergil, the name "Ceres" comes from the
Latin word "creare", "to create". She is one of the twelve "Dii
Consentes". Visual depictions of Ceres were largely derived from
Greek portrayals of Demeter.

The goddess was worshiped in many ways. There was the "porca
praecidanea", which involved sacrificing a fertile female pig and
was necessary before a harvest. Cato indicates that sacrifices of
any large food item will do, however, and suggests a pumpkin as an
acceptable substitute for a pig, since it can be cut open and the
seeds offered to Ceres in much the same way the entrails of the pig
would be. After the offering of the "porca praecidanea", it was
customary to also give the goddess a libation of wine.

Ceres' major festival was the Cerealia or Ludi Ceriales, held from
April 12th to 19th to celebrate the growth of grain and other
agricultural products. The central and oldest ritual of this
festival was a rite in which lit torches were tied to the tails of
foxes. It was performed in the Circus Maximus in the Vallis Murcia,

With the founding of the Republic in 500 BC, Ceres picked up a new
association as the goddess of the plebeian class. The archives of
the decrees of the Roman Senate and of the Concilium Plebis were
stored in her temple by the plebeian aediles. The office of the
tribune of the plebs was protected directly by Ceres. Anyone who
harmed a tribune could be killed with impunity, and his goods
consecrated to Ceres.
At the beginning of the Cerealia, plebeian families typically
invited each other to special banquets.

That was to give you a few information about this very important
goddess. Our Flamen Cerealis Flavius Galerius Aurelianus will come
back to us in these days to perform the proper rituals.

For the Ludi Ceriales in Nova Roma my intention has been to extend
the games to other languages, thus trying to involve also those
citizens who don't speak English. For this reason some of the games
of these Ludi will be held in English, Italian and French. For the
next Ludi I shall organize, the Ludi Plebei, I will do my best to
include Spanish, Portuguese and German as well.

As you know in these Ludi Ceriales we will have as always the
chariot races. They will take place on the last three days of the
Ludi, according to tradition. I invite you all to subscribe the
chariot races!

The other two main elements of the Cerealia will be two new
games: "De Romanis Illustribus" and "Battle against Carthago".
You'll learn more about them quite soon ;-)

May Ceres smile upon Nova Roma!

I hereby declare the Ludi Ceriales open!
Enjoy the Cerealia!!!

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34755 From: Maior Date: 2005-04-12
Subject: Re: LUDI CERIALES - Opening of the festival
M. Hortensia Maior Plebibus spd;
Avete Plebes;

this is the major celebration of the plebs. Let's honour divine Ceres and our
patron godddess who watches over the well-being (what is well-being
without grain?) of the people by entering and participating in the games.

You may not be aware, but such things as chariot races and other new
games are as much a part of the religious celebration as the caerimonia.

So participate omnes; show your devotion to the plebs and Ceres!
Ceres diique vos ament
Marca Hortensia Maior TRP


> As you know in these Ludi Ceriales we will have as always the
> chariot races. They will take place on the last three days of the
> Ludi, according to tradition. I invite you all to subscribe the
> chariot races!
>
> The other two main elements of the Cerealia will be two new
> games: "De Romanis Illustribus" and "Battle against Carthago".
> You'll learn more about them quite soon ;-)
>
> May Ceres smile upon Nova Roma!
>
> I
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34756 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-04-12
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Maxima <violetphearsen@y...> wrote:
> Salve
>
> philipp.hanenberg@w... wrote:
>
> I agree with you, completely. I think the young people of the
world are so hungry for moral guidance, that even though they may
not have agreed with everything Pope John Paul II said, they love
that he reached out to them.

Salve,

He was a very much a people person and knew when to dispense with
the trappings of protocol. I was listening to the radio on the way
to work and they had on a priest who had taken a class of parochial
school students from Boston to Rome and had managed to get an
audience with Pope John Paul II. He was reading to them and
said, "The peace of the Lord be with you." Instinctively the
students responded, "And also with you." There were a couple
cardinals and bishops there as well who's heads snapped up that
these students had dared to interrupt the Pope. The priest said,
The Pope just smiled and said, "Thank you."

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34757 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-12
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #1
AVETE OMNES

Let's start! Here below you find the first sentence of the "De Romanis
Illustribus" contest.

1- This man is also known for having drawn a circle on the sand around
Antiocus IV...
Who was he?

If you think you know who the sentence refers to, send an e-mail with
the answer and your roman name to mcserapio AT yahoo DOT it.
In the subject line please write "DER OMANIS ILLUSTRIBUS"
You have 24 hours to do it.

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34758 From: P. Minucia Tiberia Date: 2005-04-12
Subject: MAGNA MATER PROJECT BULLETIN APRIL 2758 A.U.C.
MAGNA MATER PROJECT BULLETIN APRIL 2758 A.U.C.

_____________________________________________________________________________

INVOCATIO

Let the sky revolve twice on its never ending axis!
Let Titan thrice yoke and thrice unyoke his steeds!
Straight away the Berecythian Pipe will blow
A blast on its bent horn
And the festival of the Idaen Mother will have come!
Gallae will march and thump their hollow drums
And cymbals clashed on cymbals
Will gather their tinking notes!
Seated on the necks of her attendants
The Goddess herself will be borne with howls
Through the streets of the city's midst.
_________________________________________________________________


THIS MONTH:

We have celebrated a very eventful and enjoyable Ludi Megalesia!...details below....
Work continues on our website, and we are about to begin some serious planning for fundraising.
Speaking of which...we have within the month received 37,00 Euros in donations....thank you! Could we could on a small donation from you today dear reader? Details are provided below on how to help this project financially...

_______________________________________________________________________________


MAGNA MATER GENERAL PLAN

Listed below are the general goals being worked on to the achieve our overall objectives of the Magna Mater Project:

i. Official Website

A domain was purchased earlier this year for hosting of our official website http://www.magnamaterproject.org from Aruba.it Servers.

The continued task which lies ahead is to develop the site in cooperation with University of Rome personnel (more on this below). In addition, the translation of website material to other languages has been discussed, and incorporation of sound dynamics. Three dimensional graphic presentations of the Magna Mater Temple structures as they appeared in antiqua is another work in progress. Have a look!



ii. Material to Promote This Project
....leaflets
....publications
....business cards
....DVD:
Filming has been completed, and we are now focused on the more technical aspects of production, as well as deciding on the most efficient distribution avenues. We will keep you updated.

iii. A 6-month scholarship for a student of the University of Rome (est. 6,000 Euros)

iv. Multimedia CD ROM
There are three viable options:
a) simple CD of presentation of the Project (10-50 pictures, 5-20 text pages, 100-1000 copies)
b) generic content CD (100-200 pictures, 25-70 text pages, music and audio effects, 3-D animations, more than 1000 copies)
c) professional CD (cost would be higher than the above: pictures, some with reserved rights, 2 or 3 experts in the multimedia field)

__________________________________________________________________________

LUDI MEGALESIA 2758 A.U.C.

Our many many thanks to those who participated in this years games and contests during this year's celebration!

Lucius Iulius Sulla Curule Aedile extends his many thanks to those who hosted the competitions, and to those who designed and updated the excellent website detailing this year's events.

The Winners:

Megalesia Certamen Historicum: Julilla Sempronia Magna Senatrix

Megalesia Venatones: Franciscus Apulus Caesar Senior Consul Novae Romae
(I'm glad that leopard came through for you, Caesar :))

Megalesia Munera Gladiatoria: Lucius Vittelius Triarius

Megalesia Rhetorical Poetry Contest: L. Arminius Faustus Tribunus Plebis

Megalesia Ludi Circenses: C. Curius Saturninus Tribunus Plebis

**Congratulations**!!

An excellent graphic tribute to our victors may be seen here:

http://www.cohorssullana.grafosystem.ro/results.htm

Thanks to T. Iulius Sabinus and his assistants for this fantastic site!

_______________________________________________________________________________


UNIVERSITY OF ROME AND SOPRINTENDENZA COOPERATION

Our primary contact individual with the University of Rome La Sapienza is Professor Patrizio Pensabene, Dipartimento Di Scienze Storiche, Archeologiche e Antropologiche dell Antichita

http://antichita.let.uniroma1.it/def_eng.htm

Our website texts and accompanying graphics are currently being developed by our cohors, and they will be presented to Professor Pensabene for his inspection and feedback, prior to their appearance on the site. We have made progress in this regard. It is a mutual goal of the collaboration of the Magna Mater Project and the University that all academic content on the website be as historically accurate as possible.

________________________________________________________________________________


COHORS AEDILES WEBSITE

For any inquiries concerning the work of the Curule Aedile or the Magna Mater Project in general, please contact Lucius Iulius Sulla @ 21Aprile@...


The address MagnaMater@... remains available as well.

Please visit http://www.insulaumbra.com/aediles/perusianus for a detailed look at the work of the Cohors and the Magna Mater Project.

__________________________________________________________________________



FINANCIAL STATUS AND FUNDRAISING

Currently, our balance is 726.66 EUROS, accounting for monetary conversion rates to EUROS from USD and other currencies.

All donations to this exciting initiative are very much appreciated.

Again,our heartfelt thanks to those who have donated financially to this project.


.If you wish to help out with fundraising, yet don't have time to actively participate, or are perhaps tight on cash, you can help out tremendously by displaying the Magna Mater link on your website. If you have any questions about this please contact Lucius Iulius Sulla Curule Aedile 21Aprile@...

__________________________________________________________________________


PROMOTION OF THE MAGNA MATER PROJECT

........IV Conventus Novae Romae 2758 Roma Italia!

Your chance to convene with other Novae Romae in the Eternal City!!!
And...your chance to tour many of the city's ancient sites, including those of the Magna Mater Project !!!
August 4-11

Please visit the main website page for the link to the details

http://www.novaroma.org

Fill out your passport application if you do not have one, and save your sestertii, amici!




____________________________Fini











































---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34759 From: Maxima Date: 2005-04-12
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
"Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:

Salvete omnes,

That is correct about the sign of peace but it is done all over the world from what I understand. Now I go to a Latin American church in Edmonton also. At that sign of peace you also get a kiss and a hug often from the senoritas. I found that a little stange at first but you can be sure old Quintus is not going to complain about that!
LOL, similarily at the Our Father, prior to communion you have to hold hands with the person on each side of you as the prayer is said. More often than not I try to make sure there are females on either side. Ah well, such are cultural differences.

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus


Salve, Quintus Lanius Paulinus

For many years, people held hands at the saying of the Our Father at San Gabriel Mission, which is one the old California missions, where I use to attend Mass. Then Cardinal Mahoney issued a decree that in the archdiocese of Los Angeles, that practive was to stop and the people were to, instead, hold their hands up as in prayer. The decree was obeyed in the English speaking community, but the Hispanic community refused to abandon the old practice as Mahoney found out, personally.
I was attending the Spanish language Mass with friends who were visiting me from Mexico. It was the feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe and Mahoney was the main celebrant at the Mass. Now, the congregation was reminded, before the Mass started, of the Cardinal's new decree. I was curious to see what was going to happen. We came to the Our Father and not only did the people hold hands, they even spread out across the aisles so that the people at the end of the pews were holding hands with the persons at the end of the opposite pews. It looked like Hands Across America, with row upon row of people holding hands in complete defiance. The look on Mahoney's face was priceless. How I had wished I had brought a camera. It was all I could do to keep from laughing out loud.
Ah well, Mahoney, such are cultural differences!

Bene vale

Maxima Valeria Messallina


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34761 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Academia Thules: First Course on Roman Law
CN·SALVIVS·ASTVR·QVIRITIBVS·S·P·D

S·V·B·E·E·V

The Academia Thules proudly presents a new free on-line course for the
edification of all our citizens and the rebirth of Roman culture.

This will be the first in a series of four courses
which, between them, will cover the full range of
Roman law up to the death of Augustus.

This first course will deal with:

- the history of Roman law
- some important legal concepts
- the role of lawyers and legal practitioners in
republican life
- constitutional law and law-making
- public religious law
- criminal law
- criminal procedure

There will be seven lessons, each with written
homework, and a small exam at the end; the week before
the exam there will be no lesson but a chance to
revise and discuss.

The other three courses, to follow later, will deal
with private law: the law of persons, the law of
things, and the law of actions. Anyone who
successfully completes all four courses and a
dissertation will receive a Baccalaureus qualification
degree from the Academia.

The course will begin on the 25th of April. Inscriptions will be
accepted from right now (13th of April) until the noon (in Rome) of
the 23th of April. In order to subscribe, please send an e-mail to:

cn.salvius.astur_DELETETHIS_@...
(e-mail address to be written as above but without the "_DELETETHIS_"
part, added to avoid spammers)

disclosing the following information:

Name (NR name, if any):
Age:

Do not miss this excellent opportunity to learn more about the
intricacies of Ancient Roman law; after all, *this* is the bedrock of
all modern Western legislation and legal concepts, and the modern
world can not be fully understood without understanding whence its
laws and institutions come.

BENE·VALETE·TV·TVIQVE·OMNES

CN·SALVIVS·T·F·A·NEP·OVF·ASTVR·SCRIPSIT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34762 From: walkyr@aol.com Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Re: Administration
Protected message is attached.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34763 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: NEW Interview the Expert - Dr. Baldassarre Conticello
AVETE OMNES

Thank you for your questions to Prof. Andrew Lintott. His answers
will be published as soon as possible.

It's now time to pass to the next interview.
The new expert invited by the Academia Italica is Dr. Baldassarre
Conticello.

Baldassarre Conticello has been the Archaeological Superintendent of
Pompeii from 1984 to 1994, where he introduced for the first time
the systematic employment of modern technologies and sciences in
archaeological surveys, from photogrammetry to paleobotany.
He has directed a number of archaeological excavations both in Italy
and in Libya.

The subject of the interview will be:
"Pompeii: its history and its lessons about ancient Rome".

You see Dr. Conticello held one of the most important and coveted
offices in the world of archaeology. You can't miss this opportunity
to interview him!
If you would like to send him a question, send me an e-mail at
mcserapio AT yahoo DOT it.

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
Propraetor Italiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34764 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - Battle Against Carthago!
AVETE OMNES

The Ludi Ceriales where introduced in Rome in 202 BC. You surely
remember it was an important year for Rome. It was the year of the
great battle at Zama against the Carthaginians.

This historical period is the setting for "Battle against Carthago",
a new game for Nova Roma while celebratin the Ludi Ceriales.
It's only a few weeks before the historical battle. While going back
to Africa Hannibal tries to strike the last Roman towns in southern
Italy.

Rome has been informed that a group of Carthaginians led by Hannibal
himself is going against a Roman town. A small army is sent against
them, but when it arrives there the Carthaginians have already
entered the town. However they do not expected to be followed by
the Roman army, so the Roman commander gives order to enter the town
and attack the enemy.

Unluckily a sentinel sees the Romans and gives the alarm, but the
Carthaginians are too few to fight. When the Romans arrive into the
town the Carthaginians soldiers are hidden into the houses, into the
public buildings, in the dark backstreets.

You are a member of the Roman army and the Roman town is... the
website of Nova Roma!!!
30 Carthaginian soldiers are hidden everywhere in the pages of
www.novaroma.org
Look for them! For each Carthaginian soldier (MILES CARTHAGINIS) you
will be awarded a certain amount of points.

20 Soldiers will give you 1 point each
10 Soldiers will give you 2 points each

And... if you'll find Hannibal you'll get 8 points!!!

The Carthaginian soldiers are hidden in the English pages only of
the website. They are not hidden in the provincial websites.

If you want to take part in "Battle against Carthago" you have to
look for the Carthaginian soldiers and Hannibal in the pages of
www.novaroma.org. As soon as you find one immediately send me an e-
mail with your Roman name and the URL (web address) where you found
it. Send your mail at
mcserapio AT yahoo DOT it.
Please write in the subject line "BATTLE AGAINST CARTHAGO".

You will have to be fast, as you will get no point if that soldier
has already been found by somebody else!

And now, come one! Start looking for the enemies!!!

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis

PS These facts are not historical. The only aim is to have fun to
celebrate the Ludi Ceriales.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34765 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #2
AVETE OMNES

I'll be busy later today, so I`m posting now the second sentence
of "De Romanis Illustribus", but you still have time to answer to
the first one. Later tonight I'll post the results of the first day
of this game.

Many citizens are taking part in "De romanis illustribus". Of course
the first sentence was quite easy. The second one will be >>very<<
easy too, but don't think it will always be like that! That's just
the beginning. We'll se who will arrive at the end! ;-)

2- She is probably the most famous mother of ancient Rome!
Who was she?

If you think you know who the sentence refers to, send an e-mail
with the answer and your roman name to mcserapio AT yahoo DOT it.
In the subject line please write "DE ROMANIS ILLUSTRIBUS"
You have 24 hours to do it.

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34766 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Battlefield Britain
Salvete omnes,

I notice that on PBS in North America there is a good documentary
series on the great battles throughout British history. Last night
they had the " Boudiccan Rebellion ". Sadly I was too busy getting
my income and corporate taxes arranged last night so I only caught
the last 20 minutes. The computer graphics of the battle were not
bad at all giving one a clearer understanding of the tactics which I
always foung a little difficult to understand on papers and diagrams.

Hopefully this will be repeated again during the week. The series
covers this Roman era right up to the Battle Of Britain from what I
gather. Next to Roman history I love history of Britain and her
empire. Enjoy!

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34767 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Magna Mater Donations
Salve Senator Pompeia,

For those of us who do not use paypal; should money orders be made out
to the "Magna Mater Project" or should they be included on our tax
payment to Nova Roma with instructions?

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus

PS: I know paypal is easier for NR but I have had a big glitch with
them when I tried to change my credit card and just got in an awful
loop with no resolutions. Also I am getting too many bogus enquiries
from id theives using paypal and ebay logos so I pulled the plug.
Hopefully, in future we can use our credit cards directly in NR.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34768 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Re: In Memoriam Ioannes Paulus Secundus
Salve Maxima Valeria,

That is very intersting. Thank you for sharing that with me and I
would loved to have seen Cardinal Mahoney's face also. From what you
say, if looks could kill they woudl have been corpses at his feet!

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus




> Salve, Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
> For many years, people held hands at the saying of the Our Father
at San Gabriel Mission, which is one the old California missions,
where I use to attend Mass. Then Cardinal Mahoney issued a decree
that in the archdiocese of Los Angeles, that practive was to stop
and the people were to, instead, hold their hands up as in prayer.
The decree was obeyed in the English speaking community, but the
Hispanic community refused to abandon the old practice as Mahoney
found out, personally.
> I was attending the Spanish language Mass with friends who were
visiting me from Mexico. It was the feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe
and Mahoney was the main celebrant at the Mass. Now, the
congregation was reminded, before the Mass started, of the
Cardinal's new decree. I was curious to see what was going to
happen. We came to the Our Father and not only did the people hold
hands, they even spread out across the aisles so that the people at
the end of the pews were holding hands with the persons at the end
of the opposite pews. It looked like Hands Across America, with row
upon row of people holding hands in complete defiance. The look on
Mahoney's face was priceless. How I had wished I had brought a
camera. It was all I could do to keep from laughing out loud.
> Ah well, Mahoney, such are cultural differences!
>
> Bene vale
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34769 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: First Course on Roman Law -- Instructor
CN·SALVIVS·ASTVR·QVIRITIBVS·S·P·D

S·V·B·E·E·V

I have realized that, with all the fuss surrounding the preparation of
the Roman Law Course, I failed to say who was actually going to be the
lecturer of the course. Please accept my apologies. :-)

The lecturer of the course will be A. Apollonius Cordus, whom is well
known in Nova Roma for his knowledge about Ancient Roman Law. To me,
he is a guarantee of erudition, scholarly knowledge and dedication, so
I am completely sure that the course will be a complete success and
that all the students will be most satisfied with the results.

BENE·VALETE·TV·TVIQVE·OMNES

CN·SALVIVS·T·F·A·NEP·OVF·ASTVR·SCRIPSIT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34770 From: Maxima Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Re: Battlefield Britain
Salve, Quintus Lanius Paulinus

It's a four part series that says it will feature, in addition to Queen Boudicca, King Owain Glyndwr of Wales, King Philip of Spain, and King William of Orange. They will use computer generated images to depict the battles, and will examine the geography, the tactics, and the weapons of each war, which, it says, will include WWII. It should be a really good series and PBS(dot)org should have all the scheduled airings, for those who are interested.

Bene vale

Maxima Valeria Messallina


"Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:

Salvete omnes,

I notice that on PBS in North America there is a good documentary series on the great battles throughout British history. Last night they had the " Boudiccan Rebellion ". Sadly I was too busy getting my income and corporate taxes arranged last night so I only caught the last 20 minutes. The computer graphics of the battle were not bad at all giving one a clearer understanding of the tactics which I always foung a little difficult to understand on papers and diagrams.

Hopefully this will be repeated again during the week. The series covers this Roman era right up to the Battle Of Britain from what I gather. Next to Roman history I love history of Britain and her empire. Enjoy!

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. Learn more.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34771 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Re: Battlefield Britain
Salve Maxima Valeria Messallina,

Thank you for the information! I see that the Boudiccan Rebellion is
on again tonight:

Battlefield Britain
Boudicca's Revolt: 61 AD
Wednesday, April 13, 8:00pm
CHANNEL 44 (WGBX)
London is burned to the ground in a battle with the Romans that led
to the defeat of Queen Boudicca's army at Mancetter. The event
impacted Britain for the next 500 years.

So that will be 10:00 - 11:00 pm for those of us on the western part
of the continent.

QLP



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Maxima <violetphearsen@y...> wrote:
> Salve, Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
> It's a four part series that says it will feature, in addition to
Queen Boudicca, King Owain Glyndwr of Wales, King Philip of Spain,
and King William of Orange. They will use computer generated images
to depict the battles, and will examine the geography, the tactics,
and the weapons of each war, which, it says, will include WWII. It
should be a really good series and PBS(dot)org should have all the
scheduled airings, for those who are interested.
>
> Bene vale
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
>
> "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I notice that on PBS in North America there is a good documentary
series on the great battles throughout British history. Last night
they had the " Boudiccan Rebellion ". Sadly I was too busy getting
my income and corporate taxes arranged last night so I only caught
the last 20 minutes. The computer graphics of the battle were not
bad at all giving one a clearer understanding of the tactics which I
always foung a little difficult to understand on papers and diagrams.
>
> Hopefully this will be repeated again during the week. The series
covers this Roman era right up to the Battle Of Britain from what I
gather. Next to Roman history I love history of Britain and her
empire. Enjoy!
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. Learn
more.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34772 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Fwd: New Actual Chariot Races and Legio Demonstrations in Jordan
Salvete Quirites,

This was posted to the Sodalitas Militarium mailing list, but I think there
may be wider interest.

Valete,

-- Marinus

----- Forwarded message from lucius_vitellius_triarius@... -----
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:35:19 -0000
From: Triarius <lucius_vitellius_triarius@...>
Reply-To: SodalitasMilitarium@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [SodalitasMilitarium] New Actual Chariot Races and Legio
Demonstrations in Jordan
To: SodalitasMilitarium@yahoogroups.com



Salvete,

I just found this website and thought it would be a good post. If they
have no NR Cives involved, this would be a really good opportunity for
someone in the area to visit with them and tank about NR involvement.

Their website states:

"Jerash is the only place in the world where Roman Army and Chariot
performances can be experienced in a genuine Roman setting. It is a
truly exciting and unique experience that you will want to see again".

The link is: http://jerashchariots.com

Valete,

Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34773 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Re: Academia Thules: First Course on Roman Law
A. Apollonius Cordus omnibus sal.

By the way, just in case anyone has the wrong
impression, let me say that you can take just the
first course on its own without committing yourself to
the other three.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34774 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Re: Battlefield Britain
G. Popillius Laenas Q. Lanio Paulino

Over on the Sodalitas Militarium list:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SodalitasMilitarium/?yguid=220596116

...you will see some questions I had about the "wedge" formation
depicted in that show and some great answers to it. My thanks
because I had forgotten wher I had seen it and I can now relay that
info.

Vale et valete.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I notice that on PBS in North America there is a good documentary
> series on the great battles throughout British history. Last night
> they had the " Boudiccan Rebellion ". Sadly I was too busy getting
> my income and corporate taxes arranged last night so I only caught
> the last 20 minutes. The computer graphics of the battle were not
> bad at all giving one a clearer understanding of the tactics which
I
> always foung a little difficult to understand on papers and
diagrams.
>
> Hopefully this will be repeated again during the week. The series
> covers this Roman era right up to the Battle Of Britain from what
I
> gather. Next to Roman history I love history of Britain and her
> empire. Enjoy!
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34775 From: romanman66 Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Salve!

Many thanks to all who have replied to my question about names, both
in this forum and privately. Obviously, the matter is more
complicated than I had though, especially since the conventions seem
to have evolved quite a lot already during Antiquity.

To simplify this subjects to myself, I have made a little summary.
Suppose I have three people to address, one patrician, Gaius Iulius
Caesar, one plebeian, Quintus Horatius Flaccus, and one person with a
honorific agnomen, Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix. Would this little
list be correct:

VERY FORMAL:
Gaius Iulius Caesar (PNC)
Quintus Horatius Flaccus (PNC)
Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix (PNCA)

POLITE/FLATTERING FORMAL SPEACH, when there is no risk of confusion:
Caesar (C)
Flaccus (C)
Felix (A)

FORMAL SPEACH, when there is no risk of confusion:
Caesar (C)
Horatius (N)
Sulla (C, since patrician)

FORMAL SPEACH, when there is need to distinguish between two people:
Gaius Caesar (PC)
Quintus Horatius (PN)
Sulla Felix (CA)

FASHION DURING LATE REPUBLIC AND PRINCIPATE:
Iulius Caesar (NC)
Horatius Flaccus (NC)
Lucius Sulla (NC)

BETWEEN FRIENDS in private:
Caesar
Flaccus
Sulla

IN THE FAMILY and between lovers:
Gaius
Quintus
Lucius

Now, in Nova Roma, I suppose you could just substitute the feminine
form of these names to get the correct way of addressing female
cives. Am I right?

As for female names in Ancient Rome, it seems as if our knowledge
today may be incomplete or uncertain. Is this a reasonable summary:

1) Women were often referred to only by the feminine form of their
father's nomen, and seldom by three names (PNC),
2) However, in the late republic and during the principate, it became
more and more usual for women to be refered to by two or three names,
3) It could be the case that women actually had more names than the
historical records suggest, since not all names were used all the
time.

When marrying, women kept their nomen. However, it seems that a woman
could take their husband's cognomen in the genitive as her own
cognomen. How common was that? Did it belong to a certain historical
period? Would she keep her 'maiden cognomen' if she had one?

What is the preferred practice in Nova Roma when a woman marries?
Should she simply keep her full maiden name (PNC1), add a second
cognomen made of her husband's cognomen in the genitive (PNC1C2) or
replace her old cognomen with that of her husband's in the genitive
(PNC2)?

In Ancient Rome, girls sometimes were 'numbered": Horatia, Horatia
Secunda, etc. Is "Secunda" considered a cognomen, or what? Did they
keep these number names when they married? Is this usage encouraged
in Nova Roma also?

Many thanks.

Valete, /Hugo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34776 From: Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Salve!

I recommend You to go to
http://www.novaroma.org/via_romana/names.html and then go to female
praenomina. I have also asked the Senior Rogator to contact You to
explain the recent research of female names and other name practises
when it comes to females. However, please be aware of the fact that
he is a really busy man and will probably not be able to answer You
right away.

Until You have got an answer from the Senior Rogator the sources are
given in the EDICTUM CENSORIS CFQ XXI DE NOMINIBUS (Censorial Edict
from Caeso Fabius Quintilianus XXI dealing with Roman Nomenclature)
at http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/edicts/censor-2004-11-18b.html

>Now, in Nova Roma, I suppose you could just substitute the feminine
>form of these names to get the correct way of addressing female
>cives. Am I right?
>
>As for female names in Ancient Rome, it seems as if our knowledge
>today may be incomplete or uncertain. Is this a reasonable summary:
>
>1) Women were often referred to only by the feminine form of their
>father's nomen, and seldom by three names (PNC),
>2) However, in the late republic and during the principate, it became at
>more and more usual for women to be refered to by two or three names,
>3) It could be the case that women actually had more names than the
>historical records suggest, since not all names were used all the
>time.
>
>When marrying, women kept their nomen. However, it seems that a woman
>could take their husband's cognomen in the genitive as her own
>cognomen. How common was that? Did it belong to a certain historical
>period? Would she keep her 'maiden cognomen' if she had one?
>
>What is the preferred practice in Nova Roma when a woman marries?
>Should she simply keep her full maiden name (PNC1), add a second
>cognomen made of her husband's cognomen in the genitive (PNC1C2) or
>replace her old cognomen with that of her husband's in the genitive
>(PNC2)?
>
>In Ancient Rome, girls sometimes were 'numbered": Horatia, Horatia
>Secunda, etc. Is "Secunda" considered a cognomen, or what? Did they
>keep these number names when they married? Is this usage encouraged
>in Nova Roma also?
>
>Many thanks.
>
>Valete, /Hugo
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus

Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34777 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Chaire, O Phile.

> VERY FORMAL:
> Gaius Iulius Caesar (PNC)
> Quintus Horatius Flaccus (PNC)
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix (PNCA)

As far as this last one goes, the agnomen, "Felix", would be absolutely,
entirely optional.

> POLITE/FLATTERING FORMAL SPEACH, when there is no risk of confusion:
> Caesar (C)
> Flaccus (C)
> Felix (A)

Here, though, you would likely address the man as "Sulla" rather than
"Felix", unless you were trying to draw attention to his being fortunate, in
which case you would more likely use "Sulla Felix", rather than just "Felix"
alone.

> FORMAL SPEACH, when there is no risk of confusion:
> Caesar (C)
> Horatius (N)
> Sulla (C, since patrician)

Correct, though I would add that it would be best to at least give the
praenomen (and probably nomen, excepting the second case, as you are already
using it) of each when first mentioning them.

> FORMAL SPEACH, when there is need to distinguish between two people:
> Gaius Caesar (PC)
> Quintus Horatius (PN)
> Sulla Felix (CA)

Or Lucius Sulla, or Lucius Sulla Felix.

> FASHION DURING LATE REPUBLIC AND PRINCIPATE:
> Iulius Caesar (NC)
> Horatius Flaccus (NC)
> Lucius Sulla (NC)

Actually, for this time period, it would be Caius Caesar, as you have above,
and perhaps Quintus Flaccus (as he is a plebeian and a non-noble, you have a
bit more options here). Lucius Sulla, or Lucius Sulla Felix, or, perhaps,
even Lucius Felix (again, to draw attention to the fortunate status) would
all be acceptable here too.

> BETWEEN FRIENDS in private:
> Caesar
> Flaccus
> Sulla

Correct.

> IN THE FAMILY and between lovers:
> Gaius
> Quintus
> Lucius

Correct.

> Now, in Nova Roma, I suppose you could just substitute the feminine
> form of these names to get the correct way of addressing female
> cives. Am I right?

Generally, assuming the woman has all these names.

> As for female names in Ancient Rome, it seems as if our knowledge
> today may be incomplete or uncertain. Is this a reasonable summary:
>
> 1) Women were often referred to only by the feminine form of their
> father's nomen, and seldom by three names (PNC),
> 2) However, in the late republic and during the principate, it became
> more and more usual for women to be refered to by two or three names,
> 3) It could be the case that women actually had more names than the
> historical records suggest, since not all names were used all the
> time.

Correct.

> When marrying, women kept their nomen. However, it seems that a woman
> could take their husband's cognomen in the genitive as her own
> cognomen. How common was that? Did it belong to a certain historical
> period? Would she keep her 'maiden cognomen' if she had one?

Fairly common. If she had a 'maiden cognomen', she may well have kept it;
males occasionally kept their previous cognomen after being adopted, so it
is possible that this was the case with women.

> What is the preferred practice in Nova Roma when a woman marries?
> Should she simply keep her full maiden name (PNC1), add a second
> cognomen made of her husband's cognomen in the genitive (PNC1C2) or
> replace her old cognomen with that of her husband's in the genitive
> (PNC2)?

From what I have seen, that depends entirely on the woman.

> In Ancient Rome, girls sometimes were 'numbered": Horatia, Horatia
> Secunda, etc. Is "Secunda" considered a cognomen, or what? Did they
> keep these number names when they married? Is this usage encouraged
> in Nova Roma also?

This would have been what would have been in the record. It's not
particularly a 'cognomen', though it could be seen as performing the same
role (i.e., adding particular description to the person).

Incidentally, the Oxford Classical Dictionary entry "names, personal, Roman"
might shed some light on the issue. I've never read the entry myself, I
just know it exists, so I unfortunately can not give much praise or contempt
for it whatsoever.

> Many thanks.

You are much welcome.

Keleuo chairein.

Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus

--
+++ NEU: GMX DSL_Flatrate! Schon ab 14,99 EUR/Monat! +++

GMX Garantie: Surfen ohne Tempo-Limit! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34778 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-13
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus - first day results
AVETE OMNES

Very well! We have a good group of participants in "De romanis
illustribus"!

The first man was quite easy to guess. Obviously it was Gaius
Popillius (or Popilius) Laenas.

Kent Polk fictionalized the anecdote in this way:

"About 168 B.C., the Syrian Monarch Antiochus Epiphanes attacked
Egypt. The Egyptians appealed to Rome for an army to repulse the
invaders. The Roman treasuries were depleted by the Punic Wars and
there was no army to send. The elderly ex-counsel Gaius Popillius
Laenas and his twelve assistants were sent instead.

Laenas and his twelve headed east from Alexandria and soon met the
great Syrian army. King Antiochus came forward to see why his army
had stopped.

"What are you doing in Egypt?" Antiochus demanded of Laenas. "Your
Majesty, I believe the question rather is, What are you doing in
Egypt?" replied the senator.

Antiochus demanded that the senator move, but Laenas stood firm. The
king's laughter ceased and he demanded:

"Who do you think you are? Behind me stands an army of thirty
thousand men."

Laenas replied "Behind you stands only a visible and rather small
army. Behind me stand the invisible legions of Rome. In the name of
the Senate and the People of Rome, I order you to go home."

As the king hesitated, Laenas took his staff and drew a circle in
the dirt around the king. When done, he stated "Step out of the
circle, King, in any direction but east, and you will answer with
your kingdom and your life." Time passed as the king studied the
resolute old senator. Finally the king turned around, stepped out of
the circle to the east, re-mounted his horse and headed home."

The original sources are:
Livy, Ab Urbe condita 45.15.
Cicero, Philippics 8.8.

The great French Renaissance thinker Michel de Montaigne (1533-1592)
also reported the anecdote in: Essays, II, 24.

Now, 13 out of 17 citizens gave the right answer.
3 citizens gave an incomplete answer
1 citizen gave the wrong answer.

When I announced the rules of the game I clearly told that it was
required to indicate the <<<full>>> name of the man or woman. For
this reason I should give no point to those who answered "Popillius
Laenas" only, thus missing the Praenomen Gaius. However I feel quite
uncomfortable with this as they clearly knew the man and the
anecdote.
For this reason, I decided that those who gave me the right answer
will get 2 points.
Those who gave me an incomplete answer will get 1 point.
Those who gave me the wrong answer (incomplete and misspelled name)
will get 0 points, but they can still catch up of course!
This rule shall be valid for the whole game.

Therefore the temporary results are:

-Marca Hortensia Maior - 2 points
-Lucius Rutilius Minervalis - 2 points
-Flavia Tullia Scholastica - 2 points
-Gnaeus Equitius Marinus - 2 points
-Marcus Arminius Maior - 2 points
-Julilla Sempronia Magna - 2 points
-Lucia Cassia Silvana - 2 points
-Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Pius - 2 points
-Caius Ianus Flaminius - 2 points
-Gaius Equitius Cato - 2 points
-Marcus Iulius Perusianus - 2 points
-Caius Sentius Maximianus Caesar - 2 points
-Publius Constantinus Placidus- 2 points
-Marcus Cassius Peregrinus - 1 point
-Titus Iulius Sabinus - 1 point
-Servia Iulia Caesaris Metelliana - 1 point
-Sextus Apollonius Scipio - 0 points


And now let's continue. I remind you the second sentence. You still
have time to answer!

2- She is probably the most famous mother of ancient Rome!
Who was she?

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34779 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-04-14
Subject: Re: Magna Mater Donations
---P. Minucia Tiberia Quinto Lanio Paulino S.P.D.

Indeed; if you wish to make a donation to the Magna Mater Project
along with your tax payment, regardless of the payment method you
choose, simply issue instructions with the remittance regarding how
much of the total sum is for taxes and how much is to be credited
toward the Magna Mater Project, and our Quaestor shall in turn receive
notification and handle it from there.

And thank you very much Propraetor!

Valete


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
>
> Salve Senator Pompeia,
>
> For those of us who do not use paypal; should money orders be made
out
> to the "Magna Mater Project" or should they be included on our tax
> payment to Nova Roma with instructions?
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
> PS: I know paypal is easier for NR but I have had a big glitch with
> them when I tried to change my credit card and just got in an awful
> loop with no resolutions. Also I am getting too many bogus enquiries
> from id theives using paypal and ebay logos so I pulled the plug.
> Hopefully, in future we can use our credit cards directly in NR.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34780 From: Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus Date: 2005-04-14
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Salve Hugo amice,

Please let me introduce myself: I am C. Moravius Laureatus Armoricus,
Rogator and Senior Scriba to Censor K. Fabius Quintilianus. I have
followed the discussion about roman names with great interest and
Censor Quintilianus has asked me if I could add a few words on what
has already been said. I would like to thank all of those who have
participated to the debate, in particular our friend Postumianus who
has already addressed your questions about female nomenclature in
Nova Roma. I will not differ very much from what he has said.

DIXISTI: As for female names in Ancient Rome, it seems as if our
knowledge
today may be incomplete or uncertain. Is this a reasonable summary:

RESPONDEO: Our knowledge is indeed uncertain. For years, it has been
taken for granted that women in ancient Rome only had one name, taken
from the nomen of their father. New research, however, especially
conducted by Finish scholars, is starting to investigate the matter
and gathering evidence. So far it would seem that women in Republican
Rome did indeed have several components in their name and it was not
so rare that many had a praenomen as it was discovered when we
studied very closely the work of Mika Kajava and her book ( "Roman
Female Praenomina" published in the Institutum Romanum Findlandiae
Vol. XIV, Rome 1994: Senatorial Women's Praenomina in the Republican
and Imperial Periods).
You will notice that her work refers to Senatorial women: We know
next to nothing to the naming practices of the poor because they just
couln't afford funeral slabs (and thus didn't leave any trace) and
were not alluded to in the writings of Latin autors.

Facing this conumdrum we had to make a decision based on the two
following facts:

- In both arguments (women had/had not praenomina), our evidence is
scarce but does not conclude that one option is more valid than the
other. If anything, modern scholars are revaluating it in favour of
women having fuller names.

- Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. As I have
mentionned above, we now next to nothing about the poorer people who
lived in ancient Rome so the situation is open to scholarly debate.
Furthermore there may be many reasons why the praenomen of a woman
was not recorded :the price of a funeral slab could be one;
traditional practice that writers did not bother to record since it
was obvious to them. For instance we have trace of the Queen of
England's name, Elizabeth II. If all written sources were destroyed
tomorrow and the archaelogists of the future only found coins with
her Majesty's head on them, would they infer that the Queen had no
surname?

So the Censor finally ruled that women should be allowed and
encouraged to have praenomina in Nova Roma. Furthermore, since
cognomina were more common for both sexes, he also decided that the
tria nomina should be the norm in all cases thus also reflecting
modern practices in offering male and female the same opportunities.

DIXIT :1) Women were often referred to only by the feminine form of
their
father's nomen, and seldom by three names (PNC),
RESPONDEO: It is true in our written sources: After all, in our
sources women seldom played a part in the biased history written by
wealthy roman men. When a woman is alluded to, it must have been
obvious to the reader who she was without needing to refer to her in
more detail. But was it true in everyday life when you had to
distinguish between several ladies with same name?
Furthermore, I am called "Laureatus" or "Armoricus" everyday of my
life and most of my correspondance on the net only shows one or two
of my cognomina. But that does not mean I do not have a fuller name.

DIXISTI : 2) However, in the late republic and during the principate,
it became
more and more usual for women to be refered to by two or three names,

RESPONDEO: Yes, Or perhaps we have more evidence of it because:

1. families became wealthier as the Empire grew and could afford to
inscribe more letters on more funeral slabs thus including a
praenomen.

2. There were more and more people sharing the same nomen and women
gained a bit of inlfuence: They had to be distinguished form one
another in the written sources.

DIXISTI: 3) It could be the case that women actually had more names
than the
historical records suggest, since not all names were used all the
time.

RESPONDEO: Exactly the point we have been defending.

DISXISTI: When marrying, women kept their nomen. However, it seems
that a woman
could take their husband's cognomen in the genitive as her own
cognomen. How common was that? Did it belong to a certain historical
period? Would she keep her 'maiden cognomen' if she had one?

RESPONDEO: I am not a specialist in marriage law so I can only give
you part of the answer. As far as we can tell a woman retained her
maiden name, no matter what. Furthermore she would most probably have
a cognomen based on her FATHER's rather than that of her husband's.

DIXISTI: What is the preferred practice in Nova Roma when a woman
marries?
Should she simply keep her full maiden name (PNC1), add a second
cognomen made of her husband's cognomen in the genitive (PNC1C2) or
replace her old cognomen with that of her husband's in the genitive
(PNC2)?

RESPONDEO: In Nova Roma the prefered practice is that she keeps her
own full name with no change to it when she marries.

DIXISTI: In Ancient Rome, girls sometimes were 'numbered": Horatia,
Horatia
Secunda, etc. Is "Secunda" considered a cognomen, or what? Did they
keep these number names when they married? Is this usage encouraged
in Nova Roma also?

RESPONDEO: If secunda was part of a lady's name and officially
recorded as such in our records then she will keep it even when she
marries, in accordance with the above point.

I hope I have brought some explanation about the process we have
followed in the censorial office in order to come to the conclusions
and rules the Censor has set. Please be aware that it will always be
a work in progress and that we are open to input from citizens and
new data coming from recent research and discoveries.

Optime Vale

C. Moravius Laureatus Armoricus
Rogator
Scriba Ductus Cohortis Censoris CFQ
Legatus Britanniae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34782 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-04-14
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
A. Apollonius Q. Metello amico Hugonique omnibusque
sal.

> > FORMAL SPEACH, when there is no risk of confusion:
> > Caesar (C)
> > Horatius (N)
> > Sulla (C, since patrician)
>
> Correct, though I would add that it would be best to
> at least give the
> praenomen (and probably nomen, excepting the second
> case, as you are already
> using it) of each when first mentioning them.

Yes, it would be normal to give two names on the first
mention, and sometimes on the last as well.

Note, again, that patrician / plebeian status is
irrelevant - what counts in nobilis / ignobilis.

Note also that you could use "Flaccus" instead of
"Horatius" if you want to be nice to him. It wouldn't
be unusually flattering to do so. In fact calling him
"Horatius" might conceivably make it sound like you're
emphasising his ignobilitas.

> > FORMAL SPEACH, when there is need to distinguish
> between two people:
> > Gaius Caesar (PC)
> > Quintus Horatius (PN)
> > Sulla Felix (CA)
>
> Or Lucius Sulla, or Lucius Sulla Felix.

I think L. Sulla would probably be most normal. Use of
an honorific agnomen would be unusually flattering.

> > FASHION DURING LATE REPUBLIC AND PRINCIPATE:
> > Iulius Caesar (NC)
> > Horatius Flaccus (NC)
> > Lucius Sulla (NC)
>
> Actually, for this time period, it would be Caius
> Caesar, as you have above,
> and perhaps Quintus Flaccus (as he is a plebeian and
> a non-noble, you have a
> bit more options here). Lucius Sulla, or Lucius
> Sulla Felix, or, perhaps,
> even Lucius Felix (again, to draw attention to the
> fortunate status) would
> all be acceptable here too.

Well, Julius Caesar *would* be in accordance with the
very-very-late republican fashion. But that fashion
was probably used most often when there was some
uncertainty about whether the person was a nobilis or
not. Since Caesar was an extremely noble nobilis, it
would probably have been more normal to call him C.
Caesar.

Remember that Lucius is a praenomen, not a nomen. So
according to the late fashion one would say "Cornelius
Sulla" in the same way as "Horatius Flaccus".

Nothing to add otherwise.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34783 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-04-14
Subject: Gallia - Edictum Propraetoricium XXX
Edictum Propraetoricium XXX

Ex Officio Propraetoris Galliae

A propos de la constatation d�absence de r�ponse d�un officier de Gallia
About the observation of lack of answer from any officer

Dans le cas o� un officier de Gallia ne r�pond pas � un ordre ou un message provenant du
Propraetor ou d�un officier sup�rieur dans un d�lai de dix jours calendaires d�une fa�on
ou d�une autre et sans aucune raison connue, le Propraetor notifiera l�officier en
question d�une constatation de carence. Le Propraetor pourra prononcer la mise � pied de
l�officier en question dans un d�lai de dix jours calendaires � partir de l�envoi de la
constatation de carence. L�officier qui constate une telle carence de l�un de ses
subordonn�s devra en alerter le Propraetor dans les plus brefs d�lais.

La constatation de carence sera notifi�e � l�officier en question par email et par lettre
post�e.
Un officier est un citoyen de Gallia exer�ant une fonction qui a n�cessit� de pr�ter le
serment public requis par la Lex Iunia de Iusiurando.

Cet Edictum est applicable imm�diatement.

---

In the case where an officer of Gallia does not reply to an order or a message from the
Propraetor or from a superior officer for ten consecutive calendars days without any
known reason and in any manner, the Propraetor will give to the officer in question a
notice. If the Propraetor has still not got any answer from the officer in question after
ten calendar days from the day the notice is sent, the Propraetor will be able to
pronounce the removal of the officer in question from his of her duties.
A superior officer has to warn the Propraetor of the inactivity of one of his or her
officers as soon as possible.

The notice will be sent by email and post mail.
An officer is a citizen of Gallia who has a position that requires a declaration of oath
described in the Lex Iunia de Iusiurando.

This Edictum becomes effective immediately.

Given in Lutetia April the 14, Year 2005 of the current Era, in the year of the
consulship of Franciscus Apulus Caesar and Gaius Popillius Laenas

Sextus Apollonius Scipio
Propraetor Galliae


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34784 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-04-14
Subject: Gallia - Edictum Propraetoricium XXXI
Edictum Propraetoricium XXXI

Ex Officio Propraetoris Galliae

A propos du changement de poste de Atrius Minius Pictor
About the change of position of Atrius Minius Pictor

Atrius Minius Pictor is not Scriba Curiae Interpretae anymore. From today, Atrius Minius
Pictor is named Scriba Curatoris Differium.

A partir d�aujourd�hui, Atrius Minius Pictor n�est plus Scriba Curiae Interpretae. Atrius
Minius Pictor est nomm� Scriba Curatoris Differium.

Given in Lutetia April the 14, Year 2005 of the current Era, in the year of the
consulship of Franciscus Apulus Caesar and Gaius Popillius Laenas

Sextus Apollonius Scipio
Propraetor Galliae






__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34785 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-14
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #3
AVETE OMNES

The right answer to the second sentence was "Cornelia", which was
always known as "Mater Gracchorum", i.e. mother of Tiberius and
Gaius Sempronius Gracchus.

Remember "De Romanis Illustribus" deals with men and women only, so
neither Gods (Magna Mater) nor animals (the she-wolf) can be the
right answer ;-)

Those who gave the right answer got 2 points. Those who gave the
wrong answer got no point.

After two days of game these are the temporary results:

-Flavia Tullia Scholastica - 4 points
-Gnaeus Equitius Marinus - 4 points
-Publius Constantinus Placidus - 4 points
-Marcus Arminius Maior - 4 points
-Julilla Sempronia Magna - 4 points
-Caius Sentius Maximianus Caesar - 4 points
-Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Pius - 4 points
-Caius Ianus Flaminius - 4 points
-Gaius Equitius Cato - 4 points
-Marcus Iulius Perusianus - 4 points


-Titus Iulius Sabinus - 3 points
-Servia Iulia Caesaris Metelliana - 3 points

-Lucius Rutilius Minervalis - 2 points
-Lucia Cassia Silvana - 2 points
-Marca Hortensia Maior - 2 points

-Marcus Cassius Peregrinus - 1 point

-Servia Adriana Marcella – 0 points


And now let's see the third sentence of « De Romanis Illustribus ».

3- The luxury and refinement of his banquets are proverbial still
today...
But he's not a cook! ;-)
Who was he?

If you think you know who the sentence refers to, send an e-mail
with the answer and your roman name to
mcserapio AT yahoo DOT it.
In the subject line please write "DE ROMANIS ILLUSTRIBUS"
You have 24 hours to do it.

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34786 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-04-14
Subject: Name change to: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
Salvete Patres et Conscripti et Quirites!

I hereby declare that I have changed my name to:

"Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus"

It is my intention to issue a new edictum where I encourage our
citizens to change their names if they feel it to be desirable, to
more historical or at least more historical-like names. I want the
process to be voluntary, some "limits" may be assigned though. My own
name change by adding a historically correct cognomen is mostly
motivated by my wish to be a model now when the second stage of the
name reform soon will start. I also want to show our citizens that I
will also go through some "problems" to get a more historical name.

The following show how I reasoned when I made this decision.

First of all I decided that I couldn't keep my former name as it was,
as it didn't have a "proper" cognomen. Quintilianus is a name that
means "adopted from Gens Quintilius" ( a now closed Gens in Nova
Roma) and most Romans that are known to have been adopted during the
republican era had praenomen + nomen + formal/traditional cognomen
for the Gens+ adoptional cognomen like "Publius Cornelius Scipio
Aemilianus". So I needed a more traditional cognomen too and of
course I wanted it historically to be a cognomen used in Gens Fabia.
When I looked through the history of the Fabii I at last decided that
the Fabii Buteo were the most interesting and suitable family to me.

My first concern was the reputation of the Fabii Buteo. As far as I
have found out the Fabii Buteo behaved in an honorable way during the
Republic. I know that there were two (brothers?) active during the
second half of the 3rd century and that they were Consules, Censor,
Magister Equites, Legatus and Dictator. As Consules they seem to have
fought on Sicily, at least without any disaster and as Dictator one
of them appointed a bunch of Senatores to fill up the Senate after
Cannae and then resigned. I now decided that I would be proud to
revive the old cognomen Buteo as a Fabian cognomen.

My next concern was the bird of prey "Buteo buteo", the so called
"Common Buzzard". I know that they don't seem to have any bad
connection in Roman myth and I know they are among the birds who were
"approved" (mentioned) as birds in augury in Rome. In Sweden they are
called "Snake Buzzards" which would indicate that they hunt snakes
and I know that they also hunt rats, to me this kind of cleanup is a
honorable activity. Further I also know that the cognomen "Buteo" was
taken by a branch of the Fabii when a "buteo" landed on a Roman ship
during the Punic wars and this event was seen as a good omen for the
Romans. The Fabius commanding this ship (or squadron or fleet) then
took the cognomen Buteo and I would like to carry on that tradition.
As I have started the Magna Mater project in Nova Roma is seems
proper that I also take a name that is connected to the Punic wars
and that struggle for victory. With the name Fabius Buteo I may also
use the Buteo buteo as symbols of my familia and as the sign on my
signet ring. ;-)

There was no reason to change my praenomen as Caeso is a praenomen
that is historically known as a Fabii praenomen and I once choose it
in an attempt to be correct from thebeginning. I am know as Caeso to
my friends and I like it.

I want to keep Quintilianus as it is a reference to the orator and
pedagog that made me choose his nomen and "cognomen". Secondly
Quintilianus is the name by which most citizens know me and further
it will not be inherited. Thirdly the Fabii mainly consisted by
adopted males for centuries as I can understand it. That way using
"Quintilianus" would also be a mark of double historicity, first of
all there was a famous Quintilianus in history and the Fabii did
adopt members into their Gens. I would seem to be adopted from Gens
Quintilius, but that Gens is now closed in Nova Roma so I wouldn't
"disturb" anyone.

At last I know that the Fabii Buteo were patricians as I am. To sum
up the name Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus feels very historical,
correct and emotionally right! From now on that will be my full name
and I will be the Pater familias of the familia Fabia Buteo.

Please read the more elaborate article about the Fabii Buteo by Aulus
Apollonius Cordus in the next issue of "Roman Times Quarterly".

Senior Fabii Buteo mentioned in some sources (same number = probably
same person, mention in different texts):

1. N. Fabius M. f. M. n. Buteo, Consul 247 Besieged Drepanium and
captured the island of Pelias. (Zon. 8.16.)
2. M. Fabius M. f. M. n. Buteo, Consul 245 May have won a victory
over the Punic fleet at Aegimurus. (Flor.)
2. M. Fabius M. f. M. n. Buteo, Censor, 241
1. N. Fabius M. f. M. n. Buteo, Magister Equitum 224, Cos. 247 (The
dictator* was his former Consular colleague)
2. M. Fabius M. f. M. n. Buteo, Legatus/Envoy 218, possibly sent to
Carthage, Cos. 245
2. M. Fabius M. f. M. n. Buteo, Dictator 216, Cos 245, revised the
roll of the Senate. He abdicated immediately.

The numbers 1 & 2 shows the possible two persons: Numerius and Marcus
(?), possibly brothers.

*L. Caecilius L. f. C. n. Metellus Cos. 251, 247 _may_ be a friend of
N. Fabius M. f. M. n. Buteo

Sources:

Different lists of Consuls, Censors and Dictators on the net.
T. R. Broughton "The magistrates of the Roman Republic", Vol. 1 509
BC - 100 B.C.(Am. Philological Ass.) -51
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34787 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-14
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - from Ovid's Fasti
AVETE OMNES

In his work Publius Ovidius Naso onbviously talks about Ceres and
the Ludi Ceriales. He also tries to explain the origin of the
particular ritual with foxes which was celebrated on this occasion.
Here below you can find the two relevant passages.

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
--------------------------------

Publius Ovidius Naso, Fasti IV, 393-416


April 12: The Games of Ceres

Next, the Games of Ceres, there's no need to say why:
Obvious: the bounteous promise and gifts of the goddess.
The bread of primitive humans was made of plants,
That the earth produced without being asked:
They sometimes plucked wild grasses from the turf,
Sometimes tender leaves from the treetops made a meal.
Later the acorn was known: its discovery was fine,
Since the sturdy oak offered a rich horde.
Ceres was first to summon men to a better diet,
Replacing their acorns with more nourishing food.
She forced bulls to bow their necks to the yoke:
So the deep-ploughed soil first saw the light.
Copper was prized then, iron was still hidden:
Ah! If only it could have been hidden forever.
Ceres delights in peace: pray, you farmers,
Pray for endless peace and a peace-loving leader.
Honour the goddess with wheat, and dancing salt grains,
And grains of incense offered on the ancient hearths,
And if there's no incense, burn your resinous torches:
Ceres is pleased with little, if it's pure in kind.
You girded attendants lift those knives from the ox:
Let the ox plough, while you sacrifice the lazy sow,
It's not fitting for an axe to strike a neck that's yoked:
Let the ox live, and toil through the stubborn soil.


IV, 679-712

April 19: The Cerialia. Ludi in the Circus

When the third dawn from the vanishing of the Hyades
Breaks, the horses will be in their stalls in the Circus.
So I must explain why foxes are loosed then,
Carrying torches fastened to scorched backs.
The land round Carseoli's cold, not suited for growing
Olives, but the soil there's appropriate for corn.
I passed it on the way to my native Pelignian country,
A small region, yet always supplied by constant streams.
There I entered, as usual, the house of my former host:
Phoebus had already unyoked his weary horses.
My host used to tell me of many things, including this,
As a preparation for my present work:
`In that plain,' he said (pointing at the plain),
A thrifty peasant woman and her sturdy husband had a small
Plot, he tilled the land himself, whether it needed ploughing,
Or required the curving sickle or the hoe.
They would sweep the cottage, set on timber piles,
She'd set eggs to hatch under the mother hen's feathers,
Or collect green mallows or gather white mushrooms,
Or warm the humble hearth with welcome fire,
And still worked her hands assiduously at the loom,
To provision them against the threat of winter cold.
She had a son: he was a playful child,
Who was already twelve years old.
In a valley, he caught, in the depths of a willow copse,
A vixen, who'd stolen many birds from the yard.
He wrapped his captive in straw and hay, and set fire
To it all: she fled the hands that were out to burn her:
In fleeing she set the crops, that covered the fields, ablaze:
And a breeze lent strength to the devouring flames.
The thing's forgotten, but a relic remains: since now
There's a certain law of Carseoli, that bans foxes:
And they burn a fox at the Cerialia to punish the species,
Destroyed in the same way as it destroyed the crops.
-------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34788 From: Messalina Minia Date: 2005-04-14
Subject: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of United Ro
The Gens Minia whole is the pleasure of indicating to the Senate of
Nova Roma, to the Province novaroman of Gallia and its Propraetor
Sextus Apollonius Scipio its decision irrevocable to leave this
company definitively. Happy to have worked these three last years
near impassioned individuals and deserving the title of Roman
citizens, we are henceforth convinced that we do not have any more
our place in this virtual world where the framework proposed is not
that of Roma. Terribly disappointed by the situation which exits
since too a long time in Gallia and in the world, considerable
citizens required to join us in order to create a new named
international Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of United Roman
Nations. The purpose of this company will be to make live the
ancient Roman culture in the everyday life by studying it, by
reconstituting it and by renovating it since its foundation into 753
before B.C. until at 1848 after B.C. (the end of the Holy Roman
Empire).

The priority value of NEO ROMA lies in practice of Religio Romana
(old faith of the Roman citizens) through the religion of State and
the Domestic Religion. We want to also allow whoever, including with
the citizens gay and lesbians to obtain the right to priesthoods, to
be formed and graduate within our school of arts, ancient cultures
and religions. Our company will accept all the romanized nations and
will include in its values, the culture Egyptian, Greek, Jewish,
African, Asian, Indo-European, Germanic, Scandinavian and will grant
even a large respect to the habits wiccas of our impassioned
citizens.

Very important is the idea to accept as Roma to move with time, it
is why we will not base ourselves solely over the republican period,
but over all the times which accompanied Rome in the history
(republican Roma, Imperial Roma, Roman Empire of Occident and the
East, Holy Roman Empire). Our mode will thus not be controlled by a
consulate but by Princeps, named Imperator.

We wish only the good of Rome and want to be in conformity with the
gods, can they guide you and invite you to join us by asking for
your citizenship on neoroma@...

Vale,

Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina

********************************************************

In French:

La Gens Minia en son entier a l'honneur d'indiquer au Sénat de Nova
Roma, à la Province novaromaine de Gaule et à son Propraetor Sextus
Apollonius Scipio sa décision irrévocable de quitter définitivement
cette société. Heureux d'avoir travaillé ces trois dernières années
auprès d'individus passionnés et méritant le titre de citoyens
romains, nous sommes dorénavant convaincus que nous n'avons plus
notre place dans ce monde virtuel où le cadre proposé n'est pas
celui de Rome. Terriblement déçu par la situation qui perdure depuis
trop longtemps en Gaule et dans le monde, bon nombre de citoyens ont
demandé à nous rejoindre afin de créer une nouvelle association
romaine internationale nommée : NEO ROMA – Empire des Nations
Romaines Unies. Cette société aura pour but de faire vivre la
culture romaine antique dans la vie quotidienne en l'étudiant, en la
reconstituant et en la rénovant depuis sa fondation en 753 av J.C.
jusqu'à 1848 ap J.C. (fin du Saint Empire Romain Germanique).
L'essence même de NEO ROMA réside dans la pratique de la Religio
Romana (ancienne foi des citoyens romains) à travers la religion
d'Etat et la Religion Domestique. Notre but est de permettre à
quiconque, y compris aux citoyens gay et lesbiennes d'obtenir le
droit aux sacerdoces, d'être formé et diplômé au sein de notre école
des arts, cultures et religions antiques. Notre société acceptera
toutes les nations romanisées et inclura dans ses valeurs, la
culture égyptienne, grecque, juive, africaine, asiatique, indo-
européenne, germanique, scandinave et accordera même un grand
respect aux coutumes wiccas de nos citoyens passionnés.
Tout aussi important est l'idée d'accepter que Rome à évoluer avec
le temps, c'est pourquoi nous ne nous baserons pas uniquement sur la
période républicaine, mais sur toutes les époques qui ont accompagné
Rome dans l'histoire (Rome républicaine, Rome Impériale, Empire
romain d'Occident et d'Orient, Saint Empire Romain Germanique).
Notre régime ne sera donc pas gouverné par un consulat mais par un
Princeps, nommé Imperator.
Nous ne souhaitons que le bien de Rome et voulons être en conformité
avec les dieux, puissent ils vous guider et vous inviter à nous
rejoindre en demandant votre citoyenneté sur neoroma@...

Vale,

Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34789 From: Triarius Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Salvete,

Okay, I have a rather odd female name situation that I am currently
facing:

My wife would like to join NR as a new citizen. She is an Egyptology
fan. Could she use an Egyptian name in her Roman Name, such as a
cognomen? For example if she had been an Egyptian female, named
Nefertari, could she be Tiberia Claudia Nefertari or Tiberia Claudia
Triaria Nefertari or Tiberia Claudia Nefertari Triaria?

I know that the first example was possible in the Early Empire, at
least in the Vitellii, as evidenced by a tombstone in Bath, England.
However, the case was for a male Legionnaire from Spain and there is
no way to know if that was his complete name.

She would like to represent her lifelong hobby of the Egyptians in
her Roman name, if possible. Any further guidance and suggestions?

Valete,

Triarius
Plebian and Descendant of Tiberius Claudius Caesar Brittanicus
(...and 129th Generation descendant of Ahmes Nefertari Queen of
Egypt...same as my wife)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34790 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
Salve!

You have directed this question to the wrong address. Questions like
this should be directed to the "censores" address found at the first
page of the NR main site, look at the bottom of that page to find:

"Have questions? Our priests, Senators, and elected magistrates are
waiting to assist you. Click here to get in touch!".

If You click there You will find out how to contact the Censores.

However as it is my Cohors (staff) that handles all name issues until
the end of June I will forward your mail to the Cohors and ask one of
my Scribae to assist You.

>Salvete,
>
>Okay, I have a rather odd female name situation that I am currently
>facing:
>
>My wife would like to join NR as a new citizen. She is an Egyptology
>fan. Could she use an Egyptian name in her Roman Name, such as a
>cognomen? For example if she had been an Egyptian female, named
>Nefertari, could she be Tiberia Claudia Nefertari or Tiberia Claudia
>Triaria Nefertari or Tiberia Claudia Nefertari Triaria?
>
>I know that the first example was possible in the Early Empire, at
>least in the Vitellii, as evidenced by a tombstone in Bath, England.
>However, the case was for a male Legionnaire from Spain and there is
>no way to know if that was his complete name.
>
>She would like to represent her lifelong hobby of the Egyptians in
>her Roman name, if possible. Any further guidance and suggestions?
>
>Valete,
>
>Triarius
>Plebian and Descendant of Tiberius Claudius Caesar Brittanicus
>(...and 129th Generation descendant of Ahmes Nefertari Queen of
>Egypt...same as my wife)

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34791 From: Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: Question about Roman names
C. Moravius Laureatus L. Vitellio Triario sal.

Although the Censores encourage citizens to look first for a latin
word (noun, adjective, historical proper name..) they do recognise
the importance of the cognomen in defining one's identity.
We have much eviodence that foreigners who were granted citizenship
often kept their old names as their new cognomen. As such, and as
rogator, I will not oppose the fact that your wife would like to
choose a cognomen of Egyptian origin and me or my colleague M.
Martiana Marcella, will happily forward the application for final
censorial approval.


I hope that helps

Optime vale

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

C. Moravius Laureatus Armoricus
Rogator
Scriba Ductus Cohortis Censoris CFQ
Legatus Britanniae

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Triarius"
<lucius_vitellius_triarius@y...> wrote:
>
>
> Salvete,
>
> Okay, I have a rather odd female name situation that I am currently
> facing:
>
> My wife would like to join NR as a new citizen. She is an
Egyptology
> fan. Could she use an Egyptian name in her Roman Name, such as a
> cognomen? For example if she had been an Egyptian female, named
> Nefertari, could she be Tiberia Claudia Nefertari or Tiberia
Claudia
> Triaria Nefertari or Tiberia Claudia Nefertari Triaria?
>
> I know that the first example was possible in the Early Empire, at
> least in the Vitellii, as evidenced by a tombstone in Bath,
England.
> However, the case was for a male Legionnaire from Spain and there
is
> no way to know if that was his complete name.
>
> She would like to represent her lifelong hobby of the Egyptians in
> her Roman name, if possible. Any further guidance and suggestions?
>
> Valete,
>
> Triarius
> Plebian and Descendant of Tiberius Claudius Caesar Brittanicus
> (...and 129th Generation descendant of Ahmes Nefertari Queen of
> Egypt...same as my wife)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34793 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Technical question about Yahoo Groups
Salvete Omnes,

yesterday I got two messages within minutes signed from two citizens living in two
different cities but apparently having the same originating IP. (Yahoo header Parameter
is: "X-Originating-IP"). Is this technically possible?

Thank you for your help.

Valete,



Sextus Apollonius Scipio

Propraetor Galliae



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34794 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: Technical question about Yahoo Groups
Sextus Apollonius Scipio wrote:
> yesterday I got two messages within minutes signed from two
> citizens living in two different cities but apparently having
> the same originating IP. (Yahoo header Parameter is:
> "X-Originating-IP"). Is this technically possible?

Salve, Sexte Apolloni Scipio.

Yes, technically possibly, given that they both have DHCP and the same
ISP, who for some reason distributes its range of IP-addresses over a
larger geographical area than is the norm. Though it's highly unlikely,
even then, that they'd be awarded the same IP that soon after each other.

Two more plausible theories:
* One citizen is visiting the other, and they're using the same computer
for conducting Nova Roman business.
* You or Yahoo is making some sort of mistake, and the IP you're looking
at is instead a Yahoo-server they're both using from their actual IPs.

Or, of course, it could be a single citizen having created a second,
fake, Nova Roman identity.

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34795 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #4
AVETE OMNES

I send you now the fourth sentence of "De Romanis Illustribus", but
you still have time to answer to the third one.
Tomorrow I'll tell you the results of the third day of the game.

7- He introduced a new tax on public urinals because... "money doesn't
stink"!

If you think you know who the sentence refers to, send an e-mail with
the answer and your roman name to
mcserapio AT yahoo DOT it.
In the subject line please write "DE ROMANIS ILLUSTRIBUS"
You have 24 hours to do it.

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34796 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #4
AVETE OMNES

> 7- He introduced a new tax on public urinals because... "money
doesn't
> stink"!

That was of course sentence #4, not 7 ;-)

VALETE
M'C.Serapio
Aedilis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34797 From: Lucius Apollonius Clement Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: Technical question about Yahoo Groups
Salve Scipio,

Even though this is a sign and you could be having doubts about the fact
that these two citizens correspond to two different persons, it is
technically possible for them to have the same originating IP.

- One could telnet into the other person computer and send an email
remotely (unlikely).
- These two people could be using the same SMTP server and this server
could put its own address as the origin of the email.

It is very probable that these two citizens only correspond to one person,
but there is always a possibility and even with the same IP addresses you
can not be positive about this.

I hope this helps,
Vale Bene.

Lucius Apollonius Clemens.

> Salvete Omnes,
>
> yesterday I got two messages within minutes signed from two citizens
> living in two
> different cities but apparently having the same originating IP. (Yahoo
> header Parameter
> is: "X-Originating-IP"). Is this technically possible?
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
> Valete,
>
>
>
> Sextus Apollonius Scipio
>
> Propraetor Galliae
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
> http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34798 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

> ... a
> new named
> international Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire
> of United Roman
> Nations.

At last - a Roman organization whose name is even
worse Latin than ours! ;)

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34799 From: Jordan Perry Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: New Rome Group
Hi,

I'm a sixth form student and I've just set up a fresh and new
Ancient Rome group. Its therefore only just set up and needs some
help to really get going. All are welcome, wherever you are over the
world, whether you have just a casual interest in the era, or you
are an expert of the period. The group is:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/templejupiter/

Come and join us so we can have some vibrant and interesting
discussions. All views and opinions are respected, and we're hoping
to build a warm community.

Many thanks
Jordan Perry
Owner of the 'Temple of Jupiter'
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34800 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
"A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...> writes:

> At last - a Roman organization whose name is even
> worse Latin than ours! ;)

True. But I bet they don't have Bunnies.

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34801 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Etevlas senmo,

"Deified eb dna rorepme edam fi nioj lliw I!"

Pig Latin from Larry, Curly and Moe.

QLP




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@y...> wrote:
> A. Apollonius omnibus sal.
>
> > ... a
> > new named
> > international Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire
> > of United Roman
> > Nations.
>
> At last - a Roman organization whose name is even
> worse Latin than ours! ;)
>
> Send instant messages to your online friends
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34802 From: Simon Larente Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Salvete,

I have not been a citizen for long, but I always wanted to ask:

Why the name Nova Roma? Who decided that and why is it not called Roma Nova?

C Velius Tutor

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
"A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...> writes:

> At last - a Roman organization whose name is even
> worse Latin than ours! ;)

True. But I bet they don't have Bunnies.

-- Marinus


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos mails !
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34803 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Salve Cai Veli, et salvete Quirites,

C Velius Tutor <slarente@...> writes:

> Why the name Nova Roma? Who decided that and why is it not called Roma
> Nova?

It's the name our Patres Patria, Vedius and Cassius, gave the organization
when they founded it and incorporated as a non-profit organization. Like
many other things Roman, it remains as it is out of respect for tradition.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34804 From: JOEY NICOLE KING Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Salvete,

Now let's be serious about this. I thought in Pig Latin one was supposed to carry the first letter to the end and add 'ay'. What you've written here appears to be backward mirror writing. I'm no expert on such matters but, I do recall an incident from Junior High...

Valete,
Metelliana

"Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:

Etevlas senmo,

"Deified eb dna rorepme edam fi nioj lliw I!"

Pig Latin from Larry, Curly and Moe.

QLP




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@y...> wrote:
> A. Apollonius omnibus sal.
>
> > ... a
> > new named
> > international Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire
> > of United Roman
> > Nations.
>
> At last - a Roman organization whose name is even
> worse Latin than ours! ;)
>
> Send instant messages to your online friends
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34805 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Salvete,

I thought neoroma was a brain tumor inhibiting the fuction of the inner ear. It also leads to swelling in the inner ear, causing infection leading to meningitis.
Valete,

"A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...> wrote:
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

> ... a
> new named
> international Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire
> of United Roman
> Nations.

At last - a Roman organization whose name is even
worse Latin than ours! ;)

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



A. Sempronius Atratinus Regulus

Astra inclinant, non necessitant. - Albinus
Aequam memento rebus in arduis servare mentem. - Horace
MMDCCLVIII Anno urbis conditae (AUC)



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Make Yahoo! your home page

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34806 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Salvete,
"Holy Roman Empire"??!! From the perspective of Roman/Romano-Byzantine law, that is about as legitimately Roman as the Donation of Constantine and the False-Decretals of Isidore are authentic. Come to think of it, it was the forgery of such documents that laid the illegitimate foundation of the "Holy Roman Empire".

Valete,

Messalina Minia <pompeiaminia@...> wrote:



The Gens Minia whole is the pleasure of indicating to the Senate of
Nova Roma, to the Province novaroman of Gallia and its Propraetor
Sextus Apollonius Scipio its decision irrevocable to leave this
company definitively. Happy to have worked these three last years
near impassioned individuals and deserving the title of Roman
citizens, we are henceforth convinced that we do not have any more
our place in this virtual world where the framework proposed is not
that of Roma. Terribly disappointed by the situation which exits
since too a long time in Gallia and in the world, considerable
citizens required to join us in order to create a new named
international Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of United Roman
Nations. The purpose of this company will be to make live the
ancient Roman culture in the everyday life by studying it, by
reconstituting it and by renovating it since its foundation into 753
before B.C. until at 1848 after B.C. (the end of the Holy Roman
Empire).

The priority value of NEO ROMA lies in practice of Religio Romana
(old faith of the Roman citizens) through the religion of State and
the Domestic Religion. We want to also allow whoever, including with
the citizens gay and lesbians to obtain the right to priesthoods, to
be formed and graduate within our school of arts, ancient cultures
and religions. Our company will accept all the romanized nations and
will include in its values, the culture Egyptian, Greek, Jewish,
African, Asian, Indo-European, Germanic, Scandinavian and will grant
even a large respect to the habits wiccas of our impassioned
citizens.

Very important is the idea to accept as Roma to move with time, it
is why we will not base ourselves solely over the republican period,
but over all the times which accompanied Rome in the history
(republican Roma, Imperial Roma, Roman Empire of Occident and the
East, Holy Roman Empire). Our mode will thus not be controlled by a
consulate but by Princeps, named Imperator.

We wish only the good of Rome and want to be in conformity with the
gods, can they guide you and invite you to join us by asking for
your citizenship on neoroma@...

Vale,

Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina

********************************************************

In French:

La Gens Minia en son entier a l'honneur d'indiquer au S�nat de Nova
Roma, � la Province novaromaine de Gaule et � son Propraetor Sextus
Apollonius Scipio sa d�cision irr�vocable de quitter d�finitivement
cette soci�t�. Heureux d'avoir travaill� ces trois derni�res ann�es
aupr�s d'individus passionn�s et m�ritant le titre de citoyens
romains, nous sommes dor�navant convaincus que nous n'avons plus
notre place dans ce monde virtuel o� le cadre propos� n'est pas
celui de Rome. Terriblement d��u par la situation qui perdure depuis
trop longtemps en Gaule et dans le monde, bon nombre de citoyens ont
demand� � nous rejoindre afin de cr�er une nouvelle association
romaine internationale nomm�e : NEO ROMA � Empire des Nations
Romaines Unies. Cette soci�t� aura pour but de faire vivre la
culture romaine antique dans la vie quotidienne en l'�tudiant, en la
reconstituant et en la r�novant depuis sa fondation en 753 av J.C.
jusqu'� 1848 ap J.C. (fin du Saint Empire Romain Germanique).
L'essence m�me de NEO ROMA r�side dans la pratique de la Religio
Romana (ancienne foi des citoyens romains) � travers la religion
d'Etat et la Religion Domestique. Notre but est de permettre �
quiconque, y compris aux citoyens gay et lesbiennes d'obtenir le
droit aux sacerdoces, d'�tre form� et dipl�m� au sein de notre �cole
des arts, cultures et religions antiques. Notre soci�t� acceptera
toutes les nations romanis�es et inclura dans ses valeurs, la
culture �gyptienne, grecque, juive, africaine, asiatique, indo-
europ�enne, germanique, scandinave et accordera m�me un grand
respect aux coutumes wiccas de nos citoyens passionn�s.
Tout aussi important est l'id�e d'accepter que Rome � �voluer avec
le temps, c'est pourquoi nous ne nous baserons pas uniquement sur la
p�riode r�publicaine, mais sur toutes les �poques qui ont accompagn�
Rome dans l'histoire (Rome r�publicaine, Rome Imp�riale, Empire
romain d'Occident et d'Orient, Saint Empire Romain Germanique).
Notre r�gime ne sera donc pas gouvern� par un consulat mais par un
Princeps, nomm� Imperator.
Nous ne souhaitons que le bien de Rome et voulons �tre en conformit�
avec les dieux, puissent ils vous guider et vous inviter � nous
rejoindre en demandant votre citoyennet� sur neoroma@...

Vale,

Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina










---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



A. Sempronius Atratinus Regulus

Astra inclinant, non necessitant. - Albinus
Aequam memento rebus in arduis servare mentem. - Horace
MMDCCLVIII Anno urbis conditae (AUC)



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34807 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Actually, I had wondered that myself.

Peter



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Simon Larente
Sent: 15 April 2005 16:38
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] New International Roman association: NEO ROMA -
Empire of United Roman Nat




Salvete,

I have not been a citizen for long, but I always wanted to ask:

Why the name Nova Roma? Who decided that and why is it not called Roma Nova?

C Velius Tutor

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
"A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...> writes:

> At last - a Roman organization whose name is even
> worse Latin than ours! ;)

True. But I bet they don't have Bunnies.

-- Marinus


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos
mails !
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







_____

Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34808 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA -Empire of United
Salvete!

Oh dear! On doing a Google search, I've discovered that NeoRoma is a brand
name of sanitary-ware in the United States . Could one prevail upon the
founders of Neo Roma to perhaps research a better name for what seems to be
a rather interesting group?

Peter



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Sent: 15 April 2005 17:36
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] New International Roman association: NEO ROMA
-Empire of United Roman Nat



Salve Cai Veli, et salvete Quirites,

C Velius Tutor <slarente@...> writes:

> Why the name Nova Roma? Who decided that and why is it not called Roma
> Nova?

It's the name our Patres Patria, Vedius and Cassius, gave the organization
when they founded it and incorporated as a non-profit organization. Like
many other things Roman, it remains as it is out of respect for tradition.

Valete,

-- Marinus



_____

Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34809 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA -Empire of United
Peter Bird <p.bird@...> writes:

> Oh dear! On doing a Google search, I've discovered that NeoRoma is a brand
> name of sanitary-ware in the United States . Could one prevail upon the
> founders of Neo Roma to perhaps research a better name for what seems to be
> a rather interesting group?

You might have more success going over to their mailing list and suggesting
this. I get the impression they posted their declaration here and don't
intend to pay much attention to the aftermath.

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34810 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA -Empire of United
A. Apollonius Cn. Equitio amico omnibusque sal.

> You might have more success going over to their
> mailing list and suggesting
> this. I get the impression they posted their
> declaration here and don't
> intend to pay much attention to the aftermath.

They stayed long enough to e-mail me a brief private
response to my "sinful" message. :)

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34811 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA -Empire of United
Salve Corde,

"A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...> writes:

> They stayed long enough to e-mail me a brief private
> response to my "sinful" message. :)

Yeah, I got one of those too.

-- Marinus the Sinner.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34812 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA -Empire of United
Salvete sinners,

Me three!
QLP


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@c...>
wrote:
> Salve Corde,
>
> "A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@y...> writes:
>
> > They stayed long enough to e-mail me a brief private
> > response to my "sinful" message. :)
>
> Yeah, I got one of those too.
>
> -- Marinus the Sinner.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34813 From: Simon Larente Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA -Empire of United
What I don't understand is that they want to recreate the Roman Empire from 753 BC to 1848 AD and base it on Roman religion, but which one do they mean? To my knowledge, the Holy Germanic Roman Empire was Christian...

C V Tutor



---------------------------------
Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos mails !
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34814 From: S E M Troianus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA -Empire of United
What "sinful message", Cordus?
That you made light of them?
Can't say that I blame you, after re-reading the declaration twice
more: All I got out of it was a general sense of "I don't like it here,
so I'm founding my own Principate!"
This will somehow be "more Roman"? Given their broad date range, their
"Empire" won't resemble any period of Rome - though I expect they'll
have fun for a while trying to be Byzantine Republicans (or whatever),
until they realize it just won't work that way.

Vale
- Troianus


On Apr 15, 2005, at 2:01 PM, A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:

>
> A. Apollonius Cn. Equitio amico omnibusque sal.
>
>> You might have more success going over to their
>> mailing list and suggesting
>> this. I get the impression they posted their
>> declaration here and don't
>> intend to pay much attention to the aftermath.
>
> They stayed long enough to e-mail me a brief private
> response to my "sinful" message. :)
>
> Send instant messages to your online friends
> http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34815 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Shall we throw a spear into the Campvs Martivs?
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mjk@...>
wrote:
>
> Etevlas senmo,
>
> "Deified eb dna rorepme edam fi nioj lliw I!"
>
> Pig Latin from Larry, Curly and Moe.
>
> QLP
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius
Cordus"
> <a_apollonius_cordus@y...> wrote:
> > A. Apollonius omnibus sal.
> >
> > > ... a
> > > new named
> > > international Roman association: NEO ROMA -
Empire
> > > of United Roman
> > > Nations.
> >
> > At last - a Roman organization whose name is even
> > worse Latin than ours! ;)
> >
> > Send instant messages to your online friends
> http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34816 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Need a Host for Provincial Website
Salvete Omnes,

I need to find someone who can take over the Provincial website for
America Medioccidentalis Superior Province. It originally was hosted
and run by Drusus Aeneas Apollonius Cygnus. It needs to be updated
badly. My knowledge on how to do this
is almost zero. Here is the link to the if someone want's to look at it:

http://www.geocities.com/drususcygnus/ams

Drusus Aeneas Apollonius Cygnus stepped down as Provincial Webmaster
sometime ago
and I have let the site languish unattended(entirely my fault). I now
find I really need to
get the site moved and updated in order help the future growth of the
Province. If anyone
is interestedin doing the updating and hosting it let me know.

Valete,
Quintus Servilius Fidenas

Propraetor
America Medioccidentalis Superior
Lictor Curiatas
Founder of Gens Servilia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34817 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA -Empire of United
Salvete omnes,

By the way I could be wrong but has anyone seen this citizen's name
in any of the NR civil service departments from sribe to Propraetor?
Contributions to the ML or any sodalistas? College Of Priests?
Assidui?

If one has not contributed one iota of time, effort and constructive
criticism here to help build, correct and learn things in Res
Publica, then they should not complain and how in the name of the
gods can they hope to ever build an infrastructure like NR on their
own?

If she has been very helpful and active in her province then I will
apologize for my comments in advance.


Troianus - " so I'm founding my own Principate!"
> This will somehow be "more Roman"? Given their broad date range,
their
> "Empire" won't resemble any period of Rome - though I expect
they'll
> have fun for a while trying to be Byzantine Republicans (or
whatever),
> until they realize it just won't work that way."

LOL, well in the Ancient Roman Republic such a renegade principate
would have got their three warnings, failing complience an army sent
and you know the rest of the story. Paraded in chains, arena fodder,
slavery etc. for the vanquished. It is well for some people that NR
does not live up to quite 100% of her ancient ideals!

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>





Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, S E M Troianus
<hermeticagnosis@e...> wrote:
> What "sinful message", Cordus?
> That you made light of them?
> Can't say that I blame you, after re-reading the declaration twice
> more: All I got out of it was a general sense of "I don't like it
here,
> so I'm founding my own Principate!"
> This will somehow be "more Roman"? Given their broad date range,
their
> "Empire" won't resemble any period of Rome - though I expect
they'll
> have fun for a while trying to be Byzantine Republicans (or
whatever),
> until they realize it just won't work that way.
>
> Vale
> - Troianus
>
>
> On Apr 15, 2005, at 2:01 PM, A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
>
> >
> > A. Apollonius Cn. Equitio amico omnibusque sal.
> >
> >> You might have more success going over to their
> >> mailing list and suggesting
> >> this. I get the impression they posted their
> >> declaration here and don't
> >> intend to pay much attention to the aftermath.
> >
> > They stayed long enough to e-mail me a brief private
> > response to my "sinful" message. :)
> >
> > Send instant messages to your online friends
> > http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34818 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Multiple Questions /was Re: [Nova-Roma] Need a Host for Provincial
Salvete,
The fact this province is another bit of home turf kind of raises a question. Actually, several.

1. If one works, owns property, and lives different times of the year in different provinces, can/should you belong to them all or one main one? [These are Tennessee, Iowa, California, Germany, Turkey].

2. If you have three sons [not yet their own pater familias] living in these different places off and on mainly in terms of college academic year, winters and summers.

2.a. Roman Name Question: Did sons ever take a name from their mother (middle name "Flavia")? Historical?
2.b. Roman Name Question: If the wife has the praenomen "Teresa" (after Teresa de Avila)
and it has a Greek root, could, and if so, how would the Greek feminine form be transformed into a Roman form? Possible? Historical?

3. Any effect of the above in terms of taxes?

Tibi gratias,
Valete,

Charlie Collins <photog2@...> wrote:
Salvete Omnes,

I need to find someone who can take over the Provincial website for
America Medioccidentalis Superior Province. It originally was hosted
and run by Drusus Aeneas Apollonius Cygnus. It needs to be updated
badly. My knowledge on how to do this
is almost zero. Here is the link to the if someone want's to look at it:

http://www.geocities.com/drususcygnus/ams

Drusus Aeneas Apollonius Cygnus stepped down as Provincial Webmaster
sometime ago
and I have let the site languish unattended(entirely my fault). I now
find I really need to
get the site moved and updated in order help the future growth of the
Province. If anyone
is interestedin doing the updating and hosting it let me know.

Valete,
Quintus Servilius Fidenas

Propraetor
America Medioccidentalis Superior
Lictor Curiatas
Founder of Gens Servilia


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



A. Sempronius Atratinus Regulus

Astra inclinant, non necessitant. - Albinus
Aequam memento rebus in arduis servare mentem. - Horace
MMDCCLVIII Anno urbis conditae (AUC)



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34819 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Pig Latin Tranaslator
Salve Metalliana,

I must be getting on now and slipped as you indicate. I looked
things up and you are correct. As they say, long term memory can be
off sometimes. Here is my revised statement:

Iway illway ebay appyhay otay oinjay Eonay Omaray ifway eythay
akemay emay ictatorday andway eifyday emay!

And as a bonus here is a english to Pig Latin translater!

http://www.snowcrest.net/donnelly/piglatin.html

Thank you for your correction.


QLP



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, JOEY NICOLE KING <metelliana@y...>
wrote:
>
> Salvete,
>
> Now let's be serious about this. I thought in Pig Latin one was
supposed to carry the first letter to the end and add 'ay'. What
you've written here appears to be backward mirror writing. I'm no
expert on such matters but, I do recall an incident from Junior
High...
>
> Valete,
> Metelliana
>
> "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
>
> Etevlas senmo,
>
> "Deified eb dna rorepme edam fi nioj lliw I!"
>
> Pig Latin from Larry, Curly and Moe.
>
> QLP
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
> <a_apollonius_cordus@y...> wrote:
> > A. Apollonius omnibus sal.
> >
> > > ... a
> > > new named
> > > international Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire
> > > of United Roman
> > > Nations.
> >
> > At last - a Roman organization whose name is even
> > worse Latin than ours! ;)
> >
> > Send instant messages to your online friends
> http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34820 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: Multiple Questions /was Re: [Nova-Roma] Need a Host for Provinc
Salve Aule Semproni, et salvete Quirites,

Aulus Sempronius Regulus <a_sempronius_regulus@...> writes:

> 1. If one works, owns property, and lives different times of the year in
> different provinces, can/should you belong to them all or one main one?
> [These are Tennessee, Iowa, California, Germany, Turkey].

I'd join the mailing lists for all of those provinces, but for census purposes
you're only going to be in one. I have a citizen in my province
(Mediatlantica) who is out of the province more often than he's in it, but
this is where his home address is located.

> 2. If you have three sons [not yet their own pater familias] living in
> these different places off and on mainly in terms of college academic year,
> winters and summers.

I hope they all have scholarships.

> 2.a. Roman Name Question: Did sons ever take a name from their mother
> (middle name "Flavia")? Historical?

If they were born out of wedlock, and their mother's father took them as his
own sons. I don't know of a historical example of a man who took his
mother's name otherwise, though I'd suppose it's possible.

> 2.b. Roman Name Question: If the wife has the praenomen "Teresa" (after
> Teresa de Avila)
> and it has a Greek root, could, and if so, how would the Greek feminine
> form be transformed into a Roman form? Possible? Historical?

I shall defer to my colleague on this one, since he has the larger body of
research into Roman onamastics.

> 3. Any effect of the above in terms of taxes?

Not in your case. Just pay the tax rate for your home province.

Vale, et valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34821 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Uni...
In a message dated 4/15/05 7:59:05 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
a_apollonius_cordus@... writes:

international Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire
> of United Roman
> Nations.



Based on the name it sounds like something to do with the Matrix movies.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34822 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Uni...
In a message dated 4/15/05 9:33:48 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
slarente@... writes:

I have not been a citizen for long, but I always wanted to ask:

Why the name Nova Roma? Who decided that and why is it not called Roma Nova?

C Velius Tutor




Roma Nova is a hotel in Italy. The domain name was already taken.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34823 From: Sextus Octavius Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: A question on religion
Salve et Salvete

I was curious... how many different names does Jupiter
(Iupiter) have in the ancient Roman religion? I've
seen several; such as Iupiter Omnius Maximus and
Iupiter Liberator.

Vale et Valete,
S. Octavius Verus



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!
http://travel.yahoo.com/p-travelguide
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34824 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: A question on religion
G. Equitius Cato S. Octavio Vero S.P.D.

Salve Sextus Verus.

Iuppiter has many names; among them: Caelestis (heavenly), Lucetius
(of the light), Totans (thunderer), Fulgurator (of the lightning). As
Iuppiter Victor he lead legions to victory, and when the legions were
on the defensive he was Iuppiter Stator or Iuppiter Protector. Under
the name of Iuppiter Capitolinus, he presided over the Roman games.
Cicero, who in 43 B.C. had his head and hands cut off for advocating a
return to republican principles, equated Jove with "numen
praestantissimae mentis", "the presence of a supreme mind." M.
Terentius Varro, whose "De Lingua Latina (On the Latin Language)" I
often quote for calendrical purposes, says the Romans identified the
sky with Iuppiter and Earth with Iuno: "These same gods Sky and Earth
are Iuppiter and Iuno..." and he quoted Ennius who said Iuppiter is
called air by the Greeks, and is identified with wind and cloud, rain,
and cold. Varro added: "Because all come from him and are under him,
he addresses him with the words: 'O father and king of the gods and
the mortals.'"(On the Latin Language, V.65)

Varro explained that the name 'Iuppiter' was derived from "Diespaiter,
that is, 'Father Day'; from which they who come from him are called
dei 'deities', and dius 'god' and divum 'sky', whence sub divo 'under
the sky' and Dius Fidus 'god of faith'. Thus from this reason the roof
of his temple is pierced with holes, that in this way the divum, which
is the caelum 'sky', may be seen. Some say it is improper to take an
oath by his name, when you are under a roof." (op.cit. V.66)

Varro continued, "Because Iuno is Iuppiter's wife, and he is Sky, she
Terra 'Earth,' the same as Tellus 'Earth,' she also, because she iuvat
'helps' una 'along' with Iuppiter, is called Iuno, and Regina 'Queen',
because all earthly things are hers." (op.cit. V.67) He showed Apollo
was the Greek name for the sun, and that the Romans called the moon
Diana. According to Varro, the sky was also called templum, the temple
of Iovis or Zeus. He cited the poets: "One there shall be, whom thou
shalt raise up to sky's azure temples.. " and, "Trembled the mighty
temple of Jove who thunders in heaven..." (op.cit. VII.6, 7)

Vale bene,

Cato




-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Sextus Octavius <octaviusverus@y...>
wrote:
>
> Salve et Salvete
>
> I was curious... how many different names does Jupiter
> (Iupiter) have in the ancient Roman religion? I've
> seen several; such as Iupiter Omnius Maximus and
> Iupiter Liberator.
>
> Vale et Valete,
> S. Octavius Verus
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!
> http://travel.yahoo.com/p-travelguide
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34825 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-04-15
Subject: Re: A question on religion
> I was curious... how many different names does Jupiter
> (Iupiter) have in the ancient Roman religion? I've
> seen several; such as Iupiter Omnius Maximus and
> Iupiter Liberator.

And just to add to the list which Caius Equitius just provided, I'll add the
epithets of which I know for Juppiter:

Beissirissa
Brixianus
Conservator
Dolichenus
Elicius
Feretrius
Fulgur
Invictus
Lapis
Latiaris
Liber
Libertas
Optimus Maximus (qui avis mittat auguribus)
Pater
Patricius
Pistor
Propugnator
Rex Deorum
Tonans

There are likely more. There are so many that it's quite dificult to track
them all. Makes you wonder if a Flamen Dialis ever tried, and even more, if
he succeeded.

Vale et Valete,

Quintus Caecilius Metellus
Fetialis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34826 From: Triarius Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Salvete,...non Gens Minia Cives Novaromani!


First, I would like to thank Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina et al for
that eloquent post (mortem).

(Triarius thinks of Cato and wishes Scyllae had not been killed in
the Ludi Megalenses...)


Second, I'm kind of confused here...

> ... a
> new named
> international Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire
> of United Roman
> Traitor Nations.

I thought "Roman Republic/Empire" was generally singular, I mean,
politically-speaking.

(Triarius ponders the questionable validity and success of
another "United Nations"...)


Third,

> They stayed long enough to e-mail me a brief private
> response to my "sinful" message. :)

I will be horribly upset if I don't get one, too.

(Triarius reaches for his e-scutum...)


Fourth,

>"A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...>
>writes:
> At last - a Roman organization whose name is even
> worse Latin than ours! ;)

>True. But I bet they don't have Bunnies.
>-- Marinus

Hmmm???

(Triarius wonders about the hazards of drinking Marinus' Falernian...)


Last, but not least,

N...Never
E...Evade
O...Obligations

R...Repudiate
O...Official
M...Minian
A...Actions


Valete, Loyal Ones
Triarius


(Triarius chuckles with a sinister look...cautiously looks around the
Forum...reaches in his toga, pulls out a spoiled bottle of Vitellian
Garum and spews it all over a NEO ROMA Recruiting Poster that has
been placed on the wall of the Tabularium...)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34827 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: Multiple Questions
CN·SALVIVS·ASTVR·A·SEMPRONIO·QVIRITIBVSQVE·OMNES·S·P·D

S·V·B·E·E·V

> The fact this province is another bit of home turf kind of raises a question.
> Actually, several.
>
> 1. If one works, owns property, and lives different times of the year in different
> provinces, can/should you belong to them all or one main one? [These are
> Tennessee, Iowa, California, Germany, Turkey].

There are cases in Europe of citizens being registered in one province
while living in another province. I would say: register in one
province -- where you spend more time, for example -- and be active in
as many provinces as you feel like.

> 2. If you have three sons [not yet their own pater familias] living in these different > places off and on mainly in terms of college academic year, winters and
> summers.

Same as above.

> 2.a. Roman Name Question: Did sons ever take a name from their mother
> (middle name "Flavia")? Historical?

I have the impression that it isn't. But they could be adopted by
their avunculus.

> 2.b. Roman Name Question: If the wife has the praenomen "Teresa" (after
> Teresa de Avila) and it has a Greek root, could, and if so, how would the Greek
> feminine form be transformed into a Roman form? Possible? Historical?

"Theresa", probably. And yes; it could be a historical cognomen.

> 3. Any effect of the above in terms of taxes?

Taxes will depend on the province where you register, yes. The way in
which "Teresa" is back-translated to Latin won't affect that aspect,
though. :-)


BENE·VALETE·TV·TVIQVE·OMNES

CN·SALVIVS·T·F·A·NEP·OVF·ASTVR·SCRIPSIT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34828 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Uni...
What about "Roma Resurgens" ?

Peter



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of QFabiusMaxmi@...
Sent: 16 April 2005 01:51
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] New International Roman association: NEO ROMA -
Empire of Uni...




In a message dated 4/15/05 9:33:48 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
slarente@... writes:

I have not been a citizen for long, but I always wanted to ask:

Why the name Nova Roma? Who decided that and why is it not called Roma
Nova?

C Velius Tutor




Roma Nova is a hotel in Italy. The domain name was already taken.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




_____

Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34829 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
As we say in New York City...yeah, what eva, tuff guy.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <pompeiaminia@...>
wrote:
>
>
>
> The Gens Minia whole is the pleasure of indicating
to the Senate of
> Nova Roma, to the Province novaroman of Gallia and
its Propraetor
> Sextus Apollonius Scipio its decision irrevocable to
leave this
> company definitively. Happy to have worked these
three last years
> near impassioned individuals and deserving the title
of Roman
> citizens, we are henceforth convinced that we do not
have any more
> our place in this virtual world where the framework
proposed is not
> that of Roma. Terribly disappointed by the situation
which exits
> since too a long time in Gallia and in the world,
considerable
> citizens required to join us in order to create a
new named
> international Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire
of United Roman
> Nations. The purpose of this company will be to make
live the
> ancient Roman culture in the everyday life by
studying it, by
> reconstituting it and by renovating it since its
foundation into 753
> before B.C. until at 1848 after B.C. (the end of the
Holy Roman
> Empire).
>
> The priority value of NEO ROMA lies in practice of
Religio Romana
> (old faith of the Roman citizens) through the
religion of State and
> the Domestic Religion. We want to also allow
whoever, including with
> the citizens gay and lesbians to obtain the right to
priesthoods, to
> be formed and graduate within our school of arts,
ancient cultures
> and religions. Our company will accept all the
romanized nations and
> will include in its values, the culture Egyptian,
Greek, Jewish,
> African, Asian, Indo-European, Germanic,
Scandinavian and will grant
> even a large respect to the habits wiccas of our
impassioned
> citizens.
>
> Very important is the idea to accept as Roma to move
with time, it
> is why we will not base ourselves solely over the
republican period,
> but over all the times which accompanied Rome in the
history
> (republican Roma, Imperial Roma, Roman Empire of
Occident and the
> East, Holy Roman Empire). Our mode will thus not be
controlled by a
> consulate but by Princeps, named Imperator.
>
> We wish only the good of Rome and want to be in
conformity with the
> gods, can they guide you and invite you to join us
by asking for
> your citizenship on neoroma@...
>
> Vale,
>
> Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina
>
>
********************************************************
>
> In French:
>
> La Gens Minia en son entier a l'honneur d'indiquer
au S�nat de Nova
> Roma, � la Province novaromaine de Gaule et � son
Propraetor Sextus
> Apollonius Scipio sa d�cision irr�vocable de quitter
d�finitivement
> cette soci�t�. Heureux d'avoir travaill� ces trois
derni�res ann�
> es
> aupr�s d'individus passionn�s et m�ritant le titre
de citoyens
> romains, nous sommes dor�navant convaincus que nous
n'avons plus
> notre place dans ce monde virtuel o� le cadre
propos� n'est pas
> celui de Rome. Terriblement d��u par la situation
qui perdure depuis
> trop longtemps en Gaule et dans le monde, bon nombre
de citoyens ont
> demand� � nous rejoindre afin de cr�er une nouvelle
association
> romaine internationale nomm�e : NEO ROMA � Empire
des Nations
> Romaines Unies. Cette soci�t� aura pour but de faire
vivre la
> culture romaine antique dans la vie quotidienne en
l'�tudiant, en la
> reconstituant et en la r�novant depuis sa fondation
en 753 av J.C.
> jusqu'� 1848 ap J.C. (fin du Saint Empire Romain
Germanique).
> L'essence m�me de NEO ROMA r�side dans la pratique
de la Religio
> Romana (ancienne foi des citoyens romains) � travers
la religion
> d'Etat et la Religion Domestique. Notre but est de
permettre �
> quiconque, y compris aux citoyens gay et lesbiennes
d'obtenir le
> droit aux sacerdoces, d'�tre form� et dipl�m� au
sein de notre �c
> ole
> des arts, cultures et religions antiques. Notre
soci�t� acceptera
> toutes les nations romanis�es et inclura dans ses
valeurs, la
> culture �gyptienne, grecque, juive, africaine,
asiatique, indo-
> europ�enne, germanique, scandinave et accordera m�me
un grand
> respect aux coutumes wiccas de nos citoyens p
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34831 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
A. Apollonius M. Flavio omnibusque sal.

> Shall we throw a spear into the Campvs Martivs?

Hmm. That would mean we had declared war on
ourselves... or possibly on the republic of Italy. :)

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34832 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Salve Triarius, et salvete Quirites,

Triarius wrote:

>>True. But I bet they don't have Bunnies.
>>-- Marinus
>
>
> Hmmm???
>
> (Triarius wonders about the hazards of drinking Marinus' Falernian...)

It's a long, long story. If you follow this link: http://tinyurl.com/ctfy7

You will learn the gist of it.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34833 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: Multiple Questions /was Re: [Nova-Roma] Need a Host for Provinc
A. Apollonius A. Sempronio omnibusque sal.

> 2.a. Roman Name Question: Did sons ever take a name
> from their mother (middle name "Flavia")?
> Historical?

In addition to what Cn. Equitius and Cn. Salvius have
said, there's also the possibility for a legitimate
child to take an extra cognomen derived from his
mother's nomen. So, for instance, M. Cato major had
two sons by two different wives, one Licinia and one
Salonia. Since each boy was the eldest son of that
particular marriage, each one received his father's
praenomen, so both were M. Porcius Cato. So to avoid
confusion, one was known as Cato Licinianus and the
other was called Cato Salonianus.

But this was really very rare (in fact that's the only
example I know of from the republic), and only
happened when there was a real danger of confusion. In
general the mother's name leaves no trace on the
child's name.

In Nova Roma a person who becomes or is born a citizen
to a citizen mother but no citizen father would
naturally take the name of the mother, because the
father simply wouldn't have a Roman name. The same was
true in Roman law, as I'm sure you know: the child of
a citizen mother and a non-citizen father took the
legal status of the mother.

> 2.b. Roman Name Question: If the wife has the
> praenomen "Teresa" (after Teresa de Avila)
> and it has a Greek root, could, and if so, how would
> the Greek feminine form be transformed into a Roman
> form? Possible? Historical?

Yes, as Cn. Salvius has explained: but not as a
praenomen, because of course there is a fixed set of
Roman praenomina and Theresa is not one of them.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34834 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus - third day results
AVETE OMNES

Here are the results of the third day of "De romanis illustribus".
We can see the first victims of the game. The leading group is
getting smaller.
Indeed the third sentence was more difficult than the previous ones.
The right answer was: Lucius Licinius Lucullus.
The Roman gourmand and former general Lucius Licinius Lucullus had
menus filed according to cost--the more important his guests, the
more costly the menu. The meals ranged in price up to 200,000
sesterces ($20,000) and were served in special halls in his palatial
home. Meals enjoyed in the Hall of Apollo, for example, cost at
least 25,000 sesterces per guest. For this solitary meal, Lucullus
merely told his servants that he would be dining alone. Plutarch
tells us that the servants brought in a "simple" 10,000-sesterce
dinner and that Lucullus raged at them. "But you are alone," they
protested. "That is when you must take special pains," Lucullus
replied, and then he uttered what became a famous proverb: "To night
Lucullus is host to Lucullus." A Lucullan banquet has come to mean a
sumptuous one.

"Lucius LUCINUS Lucullus" could not be accepted as the gens name was
misspelled.
It couldn't of course be Marcus Gavius Apicius because, while his
banquets are surely very well known, I clearly stated that the man
the sentence was referring to was NOT a cook ;-)

I also said that his banquets have become proverbial... and while we
have a Lucullan banquet, we don't have a
Trimalchionian/Trimalchionic one, so Trimalchio was not the answer.
Also it was not Gaius Petronius, as even though he's the author of
the Satyricon, we don't know anything about this banquets.

The temporary results after the third day are as follows:

-Caius Ianus Flaminius – 6 points
-Marcus Iulius Perusianus – 6 points
-Caius Sentius Maximianus Caesar – 6 points
-Publius Constantinus Placidus – 6 points

-Servia Iulia Caesaris Metelliana – 5 points
-Titus Iulius Sabinus – 5 points

-Flavia Tullia Scholastica – 4 points
-Gnaeus Equitius Marinus – 4 points
-Marcus Arminius Maior – 4 points
-Julilla Sempronia Magna – 4 points
-Lucia Cassia Silvana – 4 points
-Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Pius – 4 points
-Gaius Equitius Cato – 4 points
-Sextus Apollonius Scipio – 4 points

-Servia Adriana Marcella – 2 points
-Lucius Rutilius Minervalis – 2 points
-Marca Hortensia Maior – 2 points

-Marcus Cassius Peregrinus – 1 point

-Aelius Salaris Marullinus – 0 points


Anyway, in a few hours I'll post here the results of the 4th day and
the 5th sentence. Be ready!

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34835 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #5
AVETE OMNES

The right answer to the fourth sentence was « Titus Flavius
Vespasianus ».
1 point only to those who answered "Emperor Vespasianus" only
(remember, full name ;-) ).

The finances of state represented a major problem to Vespasian. The
treasury, depleted by the civil war, needed filling desperately,
forcing Vespasian to raise and introduce new taxes (e.g. taxing
public lavatories, prompting the famous quote: "pecunia non olet",
money doesn't stink).

The temporary results are :

-Caius Sentius Maximianus Caesar – 8 points
-Publius Constantinus Placidus – 8 points

-Servia Iulia Caesaris Metelliana – 7 points

-Flavia Tullia Scholastica – 6 points
-Caius Ianus Flaminius – 6 points
-Marcus Iulius Perusianus – 6 points
-Gnaeus Equitius Marinus – 6 points
-Julilla Sempronia Magna – 6 points
-Lucia Cassia Silvana – 6 points
-Sextus Apollonius Scipio – 6 points

-Gaius Equitius Cato – 5 points
-Titus Iulius Sabinus – 5 points

-Lucius Rutilius Minervalis – 4 points
-Marcus Arminius Maior – 4 points
-Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Pius – 4 points

-Servia Adriana Marcella – 2 points
-Marca Hortensia Maior – 2 points

-Marcus Cassius Peregrinus – 1 point

-Aelius Salaris Marullinus – 0 points



And now the fifth sentence :

5- She was held captive by an Etruscan Lucumon, but she managed to
escape together with all of the other Roman women through the Tiber.
Who was she ?

If you think you know who the sentence refers to, send an e-mail
with the answer and your roman name to
mcserapio AT yahoo DOT it.
In the subject line please write "DE ROMANIS ILLUSTRIBUS"
You have 24 hours to do it.

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34836 From: JOEY NICOLE KING Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: Pig Latin Tranaslator
Salve Sir,

Thanks for the nifty little translator. I'll have lots of fun with that.

For the record, when I read your original message I immediately held up a cd to my computer screen to read it correctly. That's how I knew it was backwards mirror writing. Oh, how I long for the good old days. You know, passing notes, thinking no one else could possibly be clever enough to read them. Except, of course, the person you're giving it to.

Just out of curiosity, do you know if there is any way to make letters appear backwards on the computer screen? I would have way too much fun with that. I'd send all my emails in mirror writing. I doubt it's possible but, it's fun to think about. Thanks again.

Vale,
Metelliana



"Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:

Salve Metalliana,

I must be getting on now and slipped as you indicate. I looked
things up and you are correct. As they say, long term memory can be
off sometimes. Here is my revised statement:

Iway illway ebay appyhay otay oinjay Eonay Omaray ifway eythay
akemay emay ictatorday andway eifyday emay!

And as a bonus here is a english to Pig Latin translater!

http://www.snowcrest.net/donnelly/piglatin.html

Thank you for your correction.


QLP



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, JOEY NICOLE KING <metelliana@y...>
wrote:
>
> Salvete,
>
> Now let's be serious about this. I thought in Pig Latin one was
supposed to carry the first letter to the end and add 'ay'. What
you've written here appears to be backward mirror writing. I'm no
expert on such matters but, I do recall an incident from Junior
High...
>
> Valete,
> Metelliana
>
> "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
>
> Etevlas senmo,
>
> "Deified eb dna rorepme edam fi nioj lliw I!"
>
> Pig Latin from Larry, Curly and Moe.
>
> QLP
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
> <a_apollonius_cordus@y...> wrote:
> > A. Apollonius omnibus sal.
> >
> > > ... a
> > > new named
> > > international Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire
> > > of United Roman
> > > Nations.
> >
> > At last - a Roman organization whose name is even
> > worse Latin than ours! ;)
> >
> > Send instant messages to your online friends
> http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34837 From: Triarius Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Salvete,

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@y...> wrote:
> A. Apollonius M. Flavio omnibusque sal.
>
> > Shall we throw a spear into the Campvs Martivs?
>
> Hmm. That would mean we had declared war on
> ourselves... or possibly on the republic of Italy. :)

No...not really.

The Vitellian Intelligence Sodalitas has uncovered a covert military
operation currently in progress within the Republic.

After much deliberation and analysis, the following photograph was
released by Sodalitas sources early this morning...

http://www.angelfire.com/empire2/vitellia/neoromasoldier.bmp

Valete,
Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34838 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Please stop the joking, we need Provincia Gallia!
Salve Quirites!

OK some of us thought that the declaration from the Minii was funny,
but, with the risk of appearing too serious, I think it is time to
stop the jokes now!

I agree that it would have been better if the criticism of the (nine)
Minii would have been closer to our ideals, but I really want to see
the Res Publica grow in Gallia and making fools of the Minii will not
fix that.

So please let us support Propraetor Sextus Apollonius Scipio and his
assistantsin his attempt to build a big and influential Provincia in
Gallia! I trust Tribune Publius Memmius Albucius and Quaestor Lucius
Rutilius Minervalis to support this goal and Provincia Gallia
certainly have my support in this effort!
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34839 From: Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: Please stop the joking, we need Provincia Gallia!
Salvete Omnes,

I indeed give all my support to Propraetor Scipio; I entirely share
his goals and I am fully at his disposal.

Valete,

Lucius Rutilius Minervalis
Aedilician Quaestor


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
<christer.edling@t...> wrote:
> Salve Quirites!
>
> OK some of us thought that the declaration from the Minii was funny,
> but, with the risk of appearing too serious, I think it is time to
> stop the jokes now!
>
> I agree that it would have been better if the criticism of the (nine)
> Minii would have been closer to our ideals, but I really want to see
> the Res Publica grow in Gallia and making fools of the Minii will not
> fix that.
>
> So please let us support Propraetor Sextus Apollonius Scipio and his
> assistantsin his attempt to build a big and influential Provincia in
> Gallia! I trust Tribune Publius Memmius Albucius and Quaestor Lucius
> Rutilius Minervalis to support this goal and Provincia Gallia
> certainly have my support in this effort!
> --
>
> Vale
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
>
> Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
> Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
> Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
> Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
> Civis Romanus sum
> ************************************************
> Cohors Censoris CFQ
> http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
> ************************************************
> Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
> "I'll either find a way or make one"
> ************************************************
> Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
> Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34840 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: Please stop the joking, we need Provincia Gallia!
Salvete Omnes,

first of all, thank you, Amice, for your help on the subject.

As said, there is no joke, nor any joy to see citizens leave Nova Roma. However, in some
cases, the best solution is to let them go. The Gens Minia would like to express its
Romanitas in another way than ours. They do not fit our system and forcing them to stay
will lead nowhere but chaos.

For Gallia, the situation is now clear and we have the opportunity of a fresh start.
Gallia has less citizens but these do work in the same direction.

I will report to the senate with details on what happened.

Valete,

--- Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus <christer.edling@...> wrote:
> Salve Quirites!
>
> OK some of us thought that the declaration from the Minii was funny,
> but, with the risk of appearing too serious, I think it is time to
> stop the jokes now!


Sextus Apollonius Scipio

Propraetor Galliae



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!
http://travel.yahoo.com/p-travelguide
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34841 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - Battle Against Carthago! - RESULTS
AVETE OMNES

WE HAVE A HERO!!! You should have seen Titus Iulius Sabinus running
in the Roman town to find all of the Carthaginian soldiers!
Each of you did his best, but Titus Iulius Sabinus in only a few
time managed to find 27 carthaginian soldiers out of 31, including
Hannibal! Unluckily, I must tell you that Hannibal managed to run
away before Sabinus could actually get him.

Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus managed to find two more
Carthagininas which neither Sabinus nor anybody else managed to
find, as did Gnaeus Equitius Marinus.

Nobody managed to find the last soldier, and I'm sorry to tell you
that he had plenty of time to fly away with his commander.

Titus Iulius Sabinus found 18 1-point-Soldiers (18 points), 8 2-
points-soldiers (16 points) and Hannibal (8 points).

Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus found a 1-point soldier and a 2-
points-soldier.

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus found a 1 point soldier.

Many of you in reality found a lot of soldiers, but they had already
been found by somebody else. I know it's frustrating...

This is the list of the pages where the soldier where hidden:

The 1 point soldiers where here:
1-
http://www.novaroma.org/via_romana/reenactments/sodalitas_militarium.
html
2-http://www.novaroma.org/via_romana/virtues.html
3-http://www.novaroma.org/via_romana/philosophy.html
4-http://www.novaroma.org/via_romana/cooking.html
5-http://www.novaroma.org/religio_romana/whywecare.html
6-http://www.novaroma.org/religio_romana/legends.html
7-http://www.novaroma.org/religio_romana/rites_and_rituals.html
8-http://www.novaroma.org/religio_romana/saturnalia.html
9-http://www.novaroma.org/religio_romana/ritual_kalends_e.html
10-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/index.html
11-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/1999-07-30-v.html
12-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2005-04-01-results.html
13-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/ccuriata/index.html
14-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/edicts/index.html
15-http://www.novaroma.org/master_index.html
16- http://www.novaroma.org/lingua_latina.html
17-http://www.novaroma.org/macellum/flags.html
18-http://www.novaroma.org/cursus_honorum/foreign_relations.html
19-http://www.novaroma.org/literature.html
20-http://www.novaroma.org/gallery/villadose/index.html

The 2 points soldiers where here
1- http://www.novaroma.org/gallery/rd2000/index.html
2-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/constitution_old.html
3-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2001-02-03-i.html
4-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-11-24-i.html
5-http://www.novaroma.org/annales/2756/index.html
6-http://www.novaroma.org/annales/2751/index.html
7-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2004-12-21-results.html
8-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2004-01-29-i.html
9-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2000-06-14-ii.html

Nobody found this one:
10-http://www.novaroma.org/sodalitates/coq/charter.html


Hannibal was here:
1-http://www.novaroma.org/cursus_honorum/small_micronations.html


Therefore the results are:

Titus Iulius Sabinus: 42 points
Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus: 3 points
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus : 1 point
Marcus Arminius Maior : 0 points
Servia Iulia Caesaris Metelliana : 0 points
Lucia Cassia Silvana : 0 points
Lucius Rutilius Minervalis : 0 points

And that's the end of the
battle. .....MAYBE..........................

........
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34842 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - Battle Against Carthago! PART 2
AVETE OMNES

The Roman citizens are thanking the soldiers for having saved their
town from the Carthaginians. The soldiers are satisfied with their
work, even though somebody blames Titus Iulius Sabinus for having
given himself all of the pleasure... ;-)

...BUT..........

............


.....

At a certain point a Roman sentinel starts shouting. It's the
alarm!!!

Hannibal surrounded the Roman town with the Carthaginian army! IT
WAS A TRAP!!! That small group of Carthaginians which first attacked
the Roman town was nothing but a bait to draw the Romans and...
maybe that Hannibal you saw was not really Hannibal but rather a
soldier with Hannibal's weapons!
And now we can understand how the information of the imminent attack
arrived in Rome... Somebody >>wanted<< it to arrive.

Romans, the battle is unavoidable, and this will be serious and very
difficult.

Go to this page:
http://www.geocities.com/mcserapio/carthago.html

You will find a picture with a lot of letters. In that picture there
are a lot of LATIN WORDS. All of them are commonly used is Nova Roma
and are contained in the Nova Roma website, so you DON'T need to
know Latin to participate. Words are written on a straight line. No
oblique word is valid.
Words can be read:
-from the top downwards
-from the bottom upwards
-from left to right
-from right to left

Words can be contained within other words. The same letter or group
of letters can be part of more than one word.
Valid words must be composed of NO LESS THAN FOUR LETTERS.

Look for the words. Each word you find is a Carthaginian you get rid
of. Each Carthaginian you get rid of is 1 point you get.

Send the list of the words you find at
mcserapio AT yahoo DOT it

In the subject line please write "BATTLE AGAINST CARTHAGO".

This time you will be awarded for every word/Carthaginian you will
find, even though it has been already found by another
citizen/soldier.

The deadline to submit the words is Monday, April 18th at 11:59pm
CET (Rome time).

Points will be added to those you get in the first part of "Battle
against Carthago".
You can take part in this game even if you did not take part in the
first part.

This time it's serious, and you'll have to do your best to avoid
another Cannae.
Romans, fight for Rome!!!

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34843 From: siegfried234 Date: 2005-04-16
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
Dear Minia,

This thing sounds interesting, but 1848 doesn't seem roman to
me. Can you tell us more.

By the way, I am not a citizen so you don't have to worry about
me joining the legions on the other side. I am sincerely curious.

Thank you.




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Messalina Minia"
<pompeiaminia@n...> wrote:
>
>
>
> The Gens Minia whole is the pleasure of indicating to the Senate of
> Nova Roma, to the Province novaroman of Gallia and its Propraetor
> Sextus Apollonius Scipio its decision irrevocable to leave this
> company definitively. Happy to have worked these three last years
> near impassioned individuals and deserving the title of Roman
> citizens, we are henceforth convinced that we do not have any more
> our place in this virtual world where the framework proposed is not
> that of Roma. Terribly disappointed by the situation which exits
> since too a long time in Gallia and in the world, considerable
> citizens required to join us in order to create a new named
> international Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of United Roman
> Nations. The purpose of this company will be to make live the
> ancient Roman culture in the everyday life by studying it, by
> reconstituting it and by renovating it since its foundation into
753
> before B.C. until at 1848 after B.C. (the end of the Holy Roman
> Empire).
>
> The priority value of NEO ROMA lies in practice of Religio Romana
> (old faith of the Roman citizens) through the religion of State and
> the Domestic Religion. We want to also allow whoever, including
with
> the citizens gay and lesbians to obtain the right to priesthoods,
to
> be formed and graduate within our school of arts, ancient cultures
> and religions. Our company will accept all the romanized nations
and
> will include in its values, the culture Egyptian, Greek, Jewish,
> African, Asian, Indo-European, Germanic, Scandinavian and will
grant
> even a large respect to the habits wiccas of our impassioned
> citizens.
>
> Very important is the idea to accept as Roma to move with time, it
> is why we will not base ourselves solely over the republican
period,
> but over all the times which accompanied Rome in the history
> (republican Roma, Imperial Roma, Roman Empire of Occident and the
> East, Holy Roman Empire). Our mode will thus not be controlled by a
> consulate but by Princeps, named Imperator.
>
> We wish only the good of Rome and want to be in conformity with the
> gods, can they guide you and invite you to join us by asking for
> your citizenship on neoroma@n...
>
> Vale,
>
> Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina
>
> ********************************************************
>
> In French:
>
> La Gens Minia en son entier a l'honneur d'indiquer au Sénat de Nova
> Roma, à la Province novaromaine de Gaule et à son Propraetor Sextus
> Apollonius Scipio sa décision irrévocable de quitter définitivement
> cette société. Heureux d'avoir travaillé ces trois dernières années
> auprès d'individus passionnés et méritant le titre de citoyens
> romains, nous sommes dorénavant convaincus que nous n'avons plus
> notre place dans ce monde virtuel où le cadre proposé n'est pas
> celui de Rome. Terriblement déçu par la situation qui perdure
depuis
> trop longtemps en Gaule et dans le monde, bon nombre de citoyens
ont
> demandé à nous rejoindre afin de créer une nouvelle association
> romaine internationale nommée : NEO ROMA – Empire des Nations
> Romaines Unies. Cette société aura pour but de faire vivre la
> culture romaine antique dans la vie quotidienne en l'étudiant, en
la
> reconstituant et en la rénovant depuis sa fondation en 753 av J.C.
> jusqu'à 1848 ap J.C. (fin du Saint Empire Romain Germanique).
> L'essence même de NEO ROMA réside dans la pratique de la Religio
> Romana (ancienne foi des citoyens romains) à travers la religion
> d'Etat et la Religion Domestique. Notre but est de permettre à
> quiconque, y compris aux citoyens gay et lesbiennes d'obtenir le
> droit aux sacerdoces, d'être formé et diplômé au sein de notre
école
> des arts, cultures et religions antiques. Notre société acceptera
> toutes les nations romanisées et inclura dans ses valeurs, la
> culture égyptienne, grecque, juive, africaine, asiatique, indo-
> européenne, germanique, scandinave et accordera même un grand
> respect aux coutumes wiccas de nos citoyens passionnés.
> Tout aussi important est l'idée d'accepter que Rome à évoluer avec
> le temps, c'est pourquoi nous ne nous baserons pas uniquement sur
la
> période républicaine, mais sur toutes les époques qui ont
accompagné
> Rome dans l'histoire (Rome républicaine, Rome Impériale, Empire
> romain d'Occident et d'Orient, Saint Empire Romain Germanique).
> Notre régime ne sera donc pas gouverné par un consulat mais par un
> Princeps, nommé Imperator.
> Nous ne souhaitons que le bien de Rome et voulons être en
conformité
> avec les dieux, puissent ils vous guider et vous inviter à nous
> rejoindre en demandant votre citoyenneté sur neoroma@n...
>
> Vale,
>
> Prisca Minia Pompeia Messalina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34845 From: Sextus Octavius Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: LUDI CERIALES - Battle Against Carthago! - RESULTS
Salvete omines,

Ah... Rome: Total War pictures. Excellent game. The
game is the best that I've seen that accurately
re-creates ancient combat. I highly suggest it for any
Roman buff. Such as our selves.

Valete bene,
S. Octavius Verus

--- Manius Constantinus Serapio <mcserapio@...>
wrote:
>
> AVETE OMNES
>
> WE HAVE A HERO!!! You should have seen Titus Iulius
> Sabinus running
> in the Roman town to find all of the Carthaginian
> soldiers!
> Each of you did his best, but Titus Iulius Sabinus
> in only a few
> time managed to find 27 carthaginian soldiers out of
> 31, including
> Hannibal! Unluckily, I must tell you that Hannibal
> managed to run
> away before Sabinus could actually get him.
>
> Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus managed to find two
> more
> Carthagininas which neither Sabinus nor anybody else
> managed to
> find, as did Gnaeus Equitius Marinus.
>
> Nobody managed to find the last soldier, and I'm
> sorry to tell you
> that he had plenty of time to fly away with his
> commander.
>
> Titus Iulius Sabinus found 18 1-point-Soldiers (18
> points), 8 2-
> points-soldiers (16 points) and Hannibal (8 points).
>
> Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus found a 1-point
> soldier and a 2-
> points-soldier.
>
> Gnaeus Equitius Marinus found a 1 point soldier.
>
> Many of you in reality found a lot of soldiers, but
> they had already
> been found by somebody else. I know it's
> frustrating...
>
> This is the list of the pages where the soldier
> where hidden:
>
> The 1 point soldiers where here:
> 1-
>
http://www.novaroma.org/via_romana/reenactments/sodalitas_militarium.
> html
> 2-http://www.novaroma.org/via_romana/virtues.html
> 3-http://www.novaroma.org/via_romana/philosophy.html
> 4-http://www.novaroma.org/via_romana/cooking.html
>
5-http://www.novaroma.org/religio_romana/whywecare.html
>
6-http://www.novaroma.org/religio_romana/legends.html
>
7-http://www.novaroma.org/religio_romana/rites_and_rituals.html
>
8-http://www.novaroma.org/religio_romana/saturnalia.html
>
9-http://www.novaroma.org/religio_romana/ritual_kalends_e.html
>
10-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/index.html
>
11-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/1999-07-30-v.html
>
12-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2005-04-01-results.html
>
13-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/ccuriata/index.html
>
14-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/edicts/index.html
> 15-http://www.novaroma.org/master_index.html
> 16- http://www.novaroma.org/lingua_latina.html
> 17-http://www.novaroma.org/macellum/flags.html
>
18-http://www.novaroma.org/cursus_honorum/foreign_relations.html
>
> 19-http://www.novaroma.org/literature.html
>
20-http://www.novaroma.org/gallery/villadose/index.html
>
> The 2 points soldiers where here
> 1- http://www.novaroma.org/gallery/rd2000/index.html
>
2-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/constitution_old.html
>
3-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2001-02-03-i.html
>
4-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-11-24-i.html
> 5-http://www.novaroma.org/annales/2756/index.html
> 6-http://www.novaroma.org/annales/2751/index.html
>
7-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2004-12-21-results.html
>
8-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2004-01-29-i.html
>
9-http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2000-06-14-ii.html
>
> Nobody found this one:
>
10-http://www.novaroma.org/sodalitates/coq/charter.html
>
>
> Hannibal was here:
>
1-http://www.novaroma.org/cursus_honorum/small_micronations.html
>
>
> Therefore the results are:
>
> Titus Iulius Sabinus: 42 points
> Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus: 3 points
> Gnaeus Equitius Marinus : 1 point
> Marcus Arminius Maior : 0 points
> Servia Iulia Caesaris Metelliana : 0 points
> Lucia Cassia Silvana : 0 points
> Lucius Rutilius Minervalis : 0 points
>
> And that's the end of the
> battle. .....MAYBE..........................
>
> ........
>
>
>
>
>



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!
http://travel.yahoo.com/p-travelguide
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34846 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: New International Roman association: NEO ROMA - Empire of Unite
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "siegfried234" <siegfried234@y...>
wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear Minia,
>
> This thing sounds interesting, but 1848 doesn't seem roman to
> me. Can you tell us more.
>
> By the way, I am not a citizen so you don't have to worry
about
> me joining the legions on the other side. I am sincerely curious.
>
> Thank you.

That's because the Holy Roman Empire was neither Roman or Holy.

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34847 From: Triarius Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Ludi Circenses for Kids
Salvete omnes,

I found a link for kids (of all ages) on The Learning Channel website.
It is a virtual chariot game and has a simple exploration of the parts
of a hippodrome. The link is:

http://tlc.discovery.com/convergence/chariotrace/game/game.html

Valete,
Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34848 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: A question on religion
CN·SALVIVS·ASTVR·QVIRITIBVS·S·P·D

S·V·B·E·E·V

Sextus Octavius scripsit:

> I was curious... how many different names does Jupiter
> (Iupiter) have in the ancient Roman religion? I've
> seen several; such as Iupiter Omnius Maximus and
> Iupiter Liberator.
>
> Vale et Valete,
> S. Octavius Verus

There are literally hundreds of different epithets for the Lord of
Olympus, because the Romans assimilited to Juppiter almost every
foreign God that was the major God in a foreign pantheon -- this
process of assimilation was called the interpretatio romana. I am not
sure if everyone has ever tried to list them all, but certainly it
will not be an easy task. Some of the most famous epithets of the
Father of the Gods are:

Juppiter Optimus Maximus ("the Best and Greatest")
Juppiter Stator ("the Stayer of Flight")
Juppiter Victor ("the Conqueror, the Victor")
Juppiter Elicius ("the Enticer")
Juppiter Ultor ("the Avenger")
Juppiter Tonans ("the Thunderer")
Juppiter Lucetius ("the Giver of Light")
Juppiter Feretrius ("the Bierer")
Juppiter Capitolinus ("of the Capitol Hill")
Juppiter Latiaris ("the Latin Juppiter")
Juppiter Pistor ("the Baker")
Juppiter Olympicus ("of Mount Olympus")
Juppiter Zeus (the Greek Juppiter)
Juppiter Taranis (the Gaulish Juppiter)

and many, many others.

You can read more about Juppiter, the origins of His cult and His many
epithets in "La religion romain archaïque", by Georges Dumezil.

BENE·VALETE·TV·TVIQVE·OMNES

CN·SALVIVS·T·F·A·NEP·OVF·ASTVR·SCRIPSIT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34849 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #6
AVETE OMNES

The answer to the fifth sentence was "Cloelia". To ensure the peace
with Rome, the Etruscan king Porsenna had been given a number of
young Romans to hold as hostages. One of the hostages, a young woman
named Cloelia, escaped her guards and led eight Roman girls to
safety as well through Tiber river. Porsenna was very angry when he
learned of the hostages' escape but after a time came to admire the
courage of this young woman. Rather than consider that the treaty
had been broken, he promised that Cloelia would be safe in his camp
if she were returned, and he further promised that he would return
her unharmed to her parents when his troops were safely out of Roman
territory. Cloelia returned and remained at Porsenna's camp and was
even allowed to select other hostages to be returned to Rome.
The temporary results are:

-Caius Sentius Maximianus Caesar – 10 points
-Publius Constantinus Placidus – 10 points

-Servia Iulia Caesaris Metelliana – 9 points

-Caius Ianus Flaminius – 8 points
-Gnaeus Equitius Marinus – 8 points
-Julilla Sempronia Magna – 8 points
-Lucia Cassia Silvana – 8 points
-Sextus Apollonius Scipio – 8 points

-Titus Iulius Sabinus – 7 points

-Lucius Rutilius Minervalis – 6 points
-Marcus Arminius Maior – 6 points
-Flavia Tullia Scholastica – 6 points
-Marcus Iulius Perusianus – 6 points

-Gaius Equitius Cato – 5 points

-Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Pius – 4 points

-Servia Adriana Marcella – 2 points
-Marca Hortensia Maior – 2 points

-Marcus Cassius Peregrinus – 1 point

-Aelius Salaris Marullinus – 0 points


And now the sixth sentence:

6- A lot of his ships have been destroyed by the iron hands.

If you think you know who the sentence refers to, send an e-mail
with the answer and your roman name to
mcserapio AT yahoo DOT it.
In the subject line please write "DE ROMANIS ILLUSTRIBUS"
You have 24 hours to do it.

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34850 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #6
Salve, Mani Constantine Serapio, et salvete, omnes.

If you posted a question to the ML yesterday, MCS, I did not receive it.
. .possibly it was on the site, which I don't access.

Vale, et valete,

Flavia Tullia Scholastica

>
> AVETE OMNES
>
> The answer to the fifth sentence was "Cloelia". To ensure the peace
> with Rome, the Etruscan king Porsenna had been given a number of
> young Romans to hold as hostages. One of the hostages, a young woman
> named Cloelia, escaped her guards and led eight Roman girls to
> safety as well through Tiber river. Porsenna was very angry when he
> learned of the hostages' escape but after a time came to admire the
> courage of this young woman. Rather than consider that the treaty
> had been broken, he promised that Cloelia would be safe in his camp
> if she were returned, and he further promised that he would return
> her unharmed to her parents when his troops were safely out of Roman
> territory. Cloelia returned and remained at Porsenna's camp and was
> even allowed to select other hostages to be returned to Rome.
> The temporary results are:
>
> -Caius Sentius Maximianus Caesar – 10 points
> -Publius Constantinus Placidus – 10 points
>
> -Servia Iulia Caesaris Metelliana – 9 points
>
> -Caius Ianus Flaminius – 8 points
> -Gnaeus Equitius Marinus – 8 points
> -Julilla Sempronia Magna – 8 points
> -Lucia Cassia Silvana – 8 points
> -Sextus Apollonius Scipio – 8 points
>
> -Titus Iulius Sabinus – 7 points
>
> -Lucius Rutilius Minervalis – 6 points
> -Marcus Arminius Maior – 6 points
> -Flavia Tullia Scholastica – 6 points
> -Marcus Iulius Perusianus – 6 points
>
> -Gaius Equitius Cato – 5 points
>
> -Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Pius – 4 points
>
> -Servia Adriana Marcella – 2 points
> -Marca Hortensia Maior – 2 points
>
> -Marcus Cassius Peregrinus – 1 point
>
> -Aelius Salaris Marullinus – 0 points
>
>
> And now the sixth sentence:
>
> 6- A lot of his ships have been destroyed by the iron hands.
>
> If you think you know who the sentence refers to, send an e-mail
> with the answer and your roman name to
> mcserapio AT yahoo DOT it.
> In the subject line please write "DE ROMANIS ILLUSTRIBUS"
> You have 24 hours to do it.
>
> OPTIME VALETE
> Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
> Aedilis Plebis
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34851 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Oxyrhynchus Papyri
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_technology/story.jsp?story=630165

Salvete Quirites,

At the link I've posted above you can read about the Oxyrhynchus Papyri, and
how they are being read even now using infrared techniques.

"In the past four days alone, Oxford's classicists have used it to make a
series of astonishing discoveries, including writing by Sophocles, Euripides,
Hesiod and other literary giants of the ancient world, lost for millennia.
They even believe they are likely to find lost Christian gospels, the
originals of which were written around the time of the earliest books of the
New Testament."

This looks quite promising.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34852 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - Chariot Races - QUARTERS
AVETE OMNES

Here we are. The chariot races of the Ludi Ceriales are starting!
Today we'll see the Quarters, tomorrow the Semifinals and on 19th
we'll se the last race!

Let's begin!

--------------------- QUARTERS -------------------------

Race 1

Tiberius Annaeus Otho
Driver: Septimius Raurax
Chariot: Basilea
Factio: Praesina
-------------
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Driver: Petronius Gnipho
Chariot: Vita Brevis
Factio: Albata
-----------------
Quintus Vitellius Triarius Vopiscus
Driver: Puteulanus Relevo
Chariot: Clarus Bellicus
Factio: Veneta
--------------------


Hello folks, and welcome to the first qualifying heats of the Ludi
Ceriales. This is the competition where the fastest chariot and it's
driver eventually will be crowned.
Down at the circus the competitors are getting ready.
At the innermost lane stands the chariot Basilea, owned by
Tiberius Annaeus Otho and driven by the skilled Septimius Raurax.
Next to him stands the chariot Vita Brevis, owned by Illustris
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus and driven by Petronius Gnipho. Next to him
on the outermost lane we find the chariot Clarus Bellicus, driven by
Puteulanus Relevo and owned by Quintus Vitellius Triarius Vopiscus.
The race starts and the chariots hurry away to the loud cheers of
the excited audience. Vita Brevis gets a small advantage entering
the first curve, but is strongly challenged by Clarus Bellicus,
whose driver tries to push the enemy to the wall. Basilea is tightly
behind the leading chariots.
Vita Brevis is having a lot of troubles with the blue chariot. The
auriga of the Factio Veneta is strongly violent. The fight continues
and Vita Brevis tries to avoid the enemy. The white chariot
understand it's time to get rid of Clarus Bellicus and starts
hurrying. That's the last lap!
OUCH! By Hercules! Clarus Bellicus hits Vita Brevis which looses
control. The white chariot crashes against the wall of the circus!
What a disaster!
Hey! Look at that! Basilea is flying! Puteulanus was too busy with
Vita Brevis to notice Basilea's attack! The green chariot outpaces
Clarus Bellicus and runs toward the finish line! Clarus Bellicus
tries to catch up but it's too late! Nobody can stop Basilea which
wins!!!
The crowd applauds and cheers loudly as Basilea and Clarus Bellicus
makes it to the semifinals.

Results:
1st Basilea
2nd Clarus Bellicus
3th Vita Brevis (accident)

Classified for semifinals: Basilea and Clarus Bellicus




------------------

Race 2

Caius Curius Saturninus
Driver : Euthymus
Chariot : Inexpugnabilis III
Factio : Praesina
----------------------
Titus Iulius Sabinus
Driver: Celeris
Chariot: Aprilis
Factio: Russata
----------------------
Lucia Cassia Silvana
Driver : Turbulentus
Chariot: Circumtono
Factio: Albata
-------------------------
Caesaris Cytheris Aege
Driver: Agathyrsus
Chariot: Tetris Tenebris
Factio: Veneta
------------------------------

As the second race for the day is being prepared the sky above the
circus is clearly blue and filled with small, fluffy
clouds. The sharp sounds of flags banging in the wind echoes through
the circus as the spectators anticipation rises. Down at the
starting-
line the competitors are getting ready. At the innermost lane stands
the chariot Inexpugnabilis III, competing for factio Praesina,
owned by Illustris Caius Curius Saturninus and driven by the skilled
Euthymus. This chariot is the winner of the chariot races of the
Ludi Megalenses! Next to him stands the chariot Aprilis, owned by
Titus Iulius Sabinus and driven by Cerelis.
Next to him we find the chariot Circumtono, owned by Lucia Cassia
Silvana and driven by Turbulentus which cheerfully waves to the
crowd. Next to him on the outermost lane we find the chariot Tetris
Tenebris, driven by Agathyrsus and owned by Caesaris Cytheris Aege.
The race starts and Tetris Tenebris and Turbulentus gets a
great start and directly takes the lead. Entering the first curve
they are strongly challenged by Inexpugnabilis III. Aprilis is
currently on the last place, but keeps a steady pace and is not far
behind the rest of the field.
Turbulentus and Tetris Tenebris are struggling hard. The blue
chariot tries to push Turbulentus against the wall of the circus but
Turbulentus manages to avoid it. Meanwhile Aprilis is catching up.
While Tetris Tenebris and Circumtono keeps struggling Aprilis and
Inexpugnabilis III take the lead of the race.
On the last lap Circumtono understands it's useless to keep
striggling with Tetris Tenebris. The white chariot hurries a bit
just to get rid of the annoying opponent. What a boring race... no
accidents, no violence...
Aprilis wins the race. Inexpugnabilis III is second. Then Circumtono
and at the end Tetris Tenebris. The crowd applauds and cheers loudly
as Aprilis and
Inexpugnabilis III makes it to the semifinals.

Results:
1st Aprilis
2nd Inexpugnabilis III
3th Circumtono
4th Tetris Tenebris

Classified for semifinals: Aprilis and Inexpugnabilis III




------------------------
Race 3

Lucius Vitellius Triarius
Driver: Felix Celeris
Chariot: Velox Puteulanus Sors
Factio: Veneta
------------------------------
Julilla Sempronia Magna
Driver: Crescens
Chariot: Delecta Mea
Factio: Praesina
---------------------
Titus Octavius Pius
Driver: Fartus Galningius
Chariot: Fulmen Boreae
Factio: Albata


--------------------------------------

The competitors are ready on the sand of the Circus.
At the innermost lane stands the chariot Velox Puteulanus Sors,
competing for
factio Veneta, owned by Lucius Vitellius Triarius and
driven by Felix Celeris. Next to him stands the well known chariot
Delecta Mea, owned by Illustris Julilla Sempronia Magna and driven
by Crescens. Next to him on the outermost lane we find the chariot
Fulmen Boreae driven by Fartus Ganingius and owned by Illustris
Titus Octavius Pius.
The race starts.
Delecta Mea and Fulmen Boreae immediately take a small lead.
Entering the first curve Fulmen tries to push Delecta Mea to the
wall of the circus, but the green driver slows down thus avoiding
the attack. The audience cheers in
excitement as the race continues. Delecta Mea hurries in the
straight lines but NO! He did it! Fulmen hurried in the curve and
hit Delecta Mea which crashed against the wall!!! Now the white
chariot can continue the race without any trouble. But it's not
finished yet! Velox Puteulanus hurries in the last laps and gets
closer to Fulmen. Fulmen tries to go faster but its horses are more
tired than those of Velox Puteulanus, which takes the lead and wins!
Velox Puteulanus Sors and Fulmen Boreae go to the Semifinals.


Results:
1st Velox Puteulanus Sors
2nd Fulment Boreae
3th Delecta Mea (Accident)

Classified for semifinals: Velox Puteulanus Sors and Fulmen Boreae.




----------------------

Race 4

Marca Hortensia Maior
Driver: Herodias
Chariot: Stella Iudee
Factio: Praesina
--------------------
Titus Licinius Crassus
Driver: Equus Magnus
Chariot: Orionis Draco
Factio: Veneta
------------------------
Franciscus Apulus Caesar
Driver: Magister Valencianus
Chariot: Apulus
Factio: Russata
---------------------------

The fourth and last qualifying race for the day is being prepared.
The competitors are getting ready. At the innermost
lane stands the chariot Stella Iudeae, owned by Illustris Marca
Hortensia Maior and driven by Herodias. Next to him
stands the chariot Orionis Draco owned by Titus Licinius Crassus
and driven by Equus Magnus. Next to him on
the outermost lane we find the chariot Apulus, driven by Magister
Valencianus
and owned by our Consul Franciscus Apulus Caesar.
The race starts and the chariots hurry away to the loud cheers of
the excited audience. Orionis Draco gets a great start and directly
takes a the lead over the others. Stella Iudeae and Apulus are
really struggling
toward one and other, but no one seems to get the upper hand. The
driver of Apulus seems to be really concentrated, while the driver
of Stella Iudeae is screaming his lungs out to get his horses to go
faster. As the chariots comes in for the final lap Orionis Draco has
the
lead, but now both Apulus and Stella Iudeae, seems to quicken up
their pace by passing the curves closely to the spina of the circus.
But... OUCH! Apulus passes the spina a bit TOO closely and the
chariot overturns!
At this point the race is easy. Orionis Draco wins the race and
Stella Iudeae arrives immediately after it. The crowd applauds and
cheers
loudly as Orionis Draco and Stella Iudeae makes it to the semifinals.

Results:
1st Orionis Draco
2nd Stella Iudeae
3th Apulus
Classified for semifinals: Orionis Draco and Stella Iudeae.
---------------

Total classified:

Veneta: 3 (Puteulanus Relevo, Velox Puteulanus Sors, Orionis Draco)
Praesina : 3 (Basilea, Inexpugnabilis III, Stella Iudeae)
Albata: 1 (Fulmen Boreae)
Russata: 1 (Aprilis)


Tomorrow the semifinals!!!

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34853 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: LUDI CERIALES - Chariot Races - QUARTERS
> Vita Brevis is having a lot of troubles with the blue chariot. The
> auriga of the Factio Veneta is strongly violent. The fight continues
> and Vita Brevis tries to avoid the enemy. The white chariot
> understand it's time to get rid of Clarus Bellicus and starts
> hurrying. That's the last lap!
> OUCH! By Hercules! Clarus Bellicus hits Vita Brevis which looses
> control. The white chariot crashes against the wall of the circus!
> What a disaster!

A word of friendly advice to Factio Veneta: Actions have consequences.

--
Marinus
Caput Factionis, Albata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34854 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #6
AVETE FLAVIA TVLLIA SCHOLASTICA OMNESQVE

> If you posted a question to the ML yesterday, MCS, I did not
receive it.
> . .possibly it was on the site, which I don't access.

[Serapio wonders about filing a petitio actionis against Yahoo...]
If that's a problem other suffered as well, I'll submit an additional
sentence for those who did not receive the 5th one.

Did anybody had the same problem as Flavia Tullia?

OPTIME VALETE
M'C.Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34855 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: Please stop the joking, we need Provincia Gallia!
Salve Amice!

>Salvete Omnes,
>
>first of all, thank you, Amice, for your help on the subject.

You know I have always been a friend of Gallia and I wish luck as its
Propraetor!

>As said, there is no joke, nor any joy to see citizens leave Nova
>Roma. However, in some
>cases, the best solution is to let them go. The Gens Minia would
>like to express its
>Romanitas in another way than ours.

Yes that seems to be true.

>They do not fit our system and forcing them to stay
>will lead nowhere but chaos.

I understand!

>For Gallia, the situation is now clear and we have the opportunity
>of a fresh start.
>Gallia has less citizens but these do work in the same direction.

Good, I wish You all the best!

>I will report to the senate with details on what happened.

I will await it with great interest.

>Valete,
>
>--- Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus <christer.edling@...> wrote:
>> Salve Quirites!
>>
>> OK some of us thought that the declaration from the Minii was funny,
>> but, with the risk of appearing too serious, I think it is time to
>> stop the jokes now!
>
>
>Sextus Apollonius Scipio
>
>Propraetor Galliae
>
>
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!
>http://travel.yahoo.com/p-travelguide
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34856 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: Please stop the joking, we need Provincia Gallia!
Salve Amice!

>Salvete Omnes,
>
>I indeed give all my support to Propraetor Scipio; I entirely share
>his goals and I am fully at his disposal.

I trust You to continue to be one of the pillars upon Gallia is
built. I am satisfied with your work in my Censorial Cohors and I am
sure You will continue to climb the Cursus Honorum. I wish Good Luck
to Propraetor Sextus Apollonius Scipio, Gallia and You!

>Valete,
>
>Lucius Rutilius Minervalis
>Aedilician Quaestor
>
>
>--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
><christer.edling@t...> wrote:
>> Salve Quirites!
>>
>> OK some of us thought that the declaration from the Minii was funny,
>> but, with the risk of appearing too serious, I think it is time to
>> stop the jokes now!
>>
>> I agree that it would have been better if the criticism of the (nine)
>> Minii would have been closer to our ideals, but I really want to see
>> the Res Publica grow in Gallia and making fools of the Minii will not
>> fix that.
>>
>> So please let us support Propraetor Sextus Apollonius Scipio and his
>> assistantsin his attempt to build a big and influential Provincia in
>> Gallia! I trust Tribune Publius Memmius Albucius and Quaestor Lucius
>> Rutilius Minervalis to support this goal and Provincia Gallia
>> certainly have my support in this effort!
>> --
>>
>> Vale
>>
>> Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
>>
>> Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
>> Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
>> Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
>> Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
>> Civis Romanus sum
>> ************************************************
>> Cohors Censoris CFQ
>> http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
>> ************************************************
>> Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
>> "I'll either find a way or make one"
>> ************************************************
>> Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
>> Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34857 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Reproduction Roman Furniture
Salvete,

Is there a recommended US maker of reproduction Roman furniture?

I discovered a couple of British and Italian merchants but import to US
cost more than I would like to pay.

I already have some pieces copied by the Amish but they can't make
it if I don't have something to copy. I am, in particular, looking for
candelaria and chairs.

Tibi gratias,



A. Sempronius Atratinus Regulus

Astra inclinant, non necessitant. - Albinus
Aequam memento rebus in arduis servare mentem. - Horace
MMDCCLVIII Anno urbis conditae (AUC)



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34858 From: Lucia Cassia Silvana Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: LUDI CERIALES - Chariot Races - QUARTERS
By Hercules, indeed! My sympathies to teammate Marinus on the loss of
his chariot (may his driver be hale and whole) and best wishes for
success in the semifinals to teammate Pius! -Cassia Silvana

> > OUCH! By Hercules! Clarus Bellicus hits Vita Brevis which looses
> > control. The white chariot crashes against the wall of the circus!
> > What a disaster!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34859 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - Battle Against Carthago! - Temporary Results
AVETE OMNES

The battle against Hannibal's army is going on strongly but it's
still far from being won!
For the time being Lucius Vitellius Triarius found 69 words, Titus
Iulius Sabinus found 60 words, Lucius Rutilius Minervalis found 55
words and Gnaeus Equitius Marinus found 40 words.

Therefore these are the temporary results:

1-Titus Flavius Sabinus – 102 points
2-Lucius Vitellius Triarius – 69 points
3-Lucius Rutilius Minervalis – 55 points
4-Gnaeus Equitius Marinus – 41 points
5-Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus – 3 points

Keep fighting !!!
Citizens, you still have time to join the game !


Go to this page:
http://www.geocities.com/mcserapio/carthago.html

You will find a picture with a lot of letters. In that picture there
are a lot of LATIN WORDS. All of them are commonly used is Nova Roma
and are contained in the Nova Roma website, so you DON'T need to
know Latin to participate. Words are written on a straight line. No
oblique word is valid.
Words can be read:
-from the top downwards
-from the bottom upwards
-from left to right
-from right to left

Words can be contained within other words. The same letter or group
of letters can be part of more than one word.
Valid words must be composed of NO LESS THAN FOUR LETTERS.

Look for the words. Each word you find is a Carthaginian you get rid
of. Each Carthaginian you get rid of is 1 point you get.

Send the list of the words you find at
mcserapio AT yahoo DOT it

In the subject line please write "BATTLE AGAINST CARTHAGO".

This time you will be awarded for every word/Carthaginian you will
find, even though it has been already found by another
citizen/soldier.

The deadline to submit the words is Monday, April 18th at 11:59pm
CET (Rome time).

Points will be added to those you get in the first part of "Battle
against Carthago".
You can take part in this game even if you did not take part in the
first part.

This time it's serious, and you'll have to do your best to avoid
another Cannae.
Romans, fight for Rome!!!

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34860 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: LUDI CERIALES - Battle Against Carthago! - Temporary Results
SALVE SERAPIO !

Who is Titus Flavius Sabinus ?

OPTIME VALE,
IVL SABINVS

Manius Constantinus Serapio <mcserapio@...> wrote:

AVETE OMNES

The battle against Hannibal's army is going on strongly but it's
still far from being won!
For the time being Lucius Vitellius Triarius found 69 words, Titus
Iulius Sabinus found 60 words, Lucius Rutilius Minervalis found 55
words and Gnaeus Equitius Marinus found 40 words.

Therefore these are the temporary results:

1-Titus Flavius Sabinus � 102 points
2-Lucius Vitellius Triarius � 69 points
3-Lucius Rutilius Minervalis � 55 points
4-Gnaeus Equitius Marinus � 41 points
5-Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus � 3 points

Keep fighting !!!
Citizens, you still have time to join the game !


Go to this page:
http://www.geocities.com/mcserapio/carthago.html

You will find a picture with a lot of letters. In that picture there
are a lot of LATIN WORDS. All of them are commonly used is Nova Roma
and are contained in the Nova Roma website, so you DON'T need to
know Latin to participate. Words are written on a straight line. No
oblique word is valid.
Words can be read:
-from the top downwards
-from the bottom upwards
-from left to right
-from right to left

Words can be contained within other words. The same letter or group
of letters can be part of more than one word.
Valid words must be composed of NO LESS THAN FOUR LETTERS.

Look for the words. Each word you find is a Carthaginian you get rid
of. Each Carthaginian you get rid of is 1 point you get.

Send the list of the words you find at
mcserapio AT yahoo DOT it

In the subject line please write "BATTLE AGAINST CARTHAGO".

This time you will be awarded for every word/Carthaginian you will
find, even though it has been already found by another
citizen/soldier.

The deadline to submit the words is Monday, April 18th at 11:59pm
CET (Rome time).

Points will be added to those you get in the first part of "Battle
against Carthago".
You can take part in this game even if you did not take part in the
first part.

This time it's serious, and you'll have to do your best to avoid
another Cannae.
Romans, fight for Rome!!!

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34861 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: Reproduction Roman Furniture
Salve Aule Semporni Regule,

I have a few Roman reproduction pieces but I found them in larger
furniture stores. Lately at the Bay and Sears I saw Roman style
recliner couches and those folding chairs. I don't know what the
Amish folks would charge but here in Canada I find anything custom
made costs and arm and a leg since carpentry rates are close to
those of electricians, mechanics etc. For example it costs 1200.00
Cdn or about 950 US just to re-stuff and cover a older sofa. Try
looking around major furniture stores, visit the Italian sections if
you live in a big city as well as flea markets.

Yeah, importing is expensive - just bought in a rarer 20.00 cd from
the US and payed 7.00 duty so I hate to see what 5000 K duty would
be. I'll keep my eye on furniture sites in North America and post it
to the list if I see anything. I looked around for half an hour and
found nothing yet.


Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus










--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Aulus Sempronius Regulus
<a_sempronius_regulus@y...> wrote:
>
> Salvete,
>
> Is there a recommended US maker of reproduction Roman furniture?
>
> I discovered a couple of British and Italian merchants but import
to US
> cost more than I would like to pay.
>
> I already have some pieces copied by the Amish but they can't make
> it if I don't have something to copy. I am, in particular, looking
for
> candelaria and chairs.
>
> Tibi gratias,
>
>
>
> A. Sempronius Atratinus Regulus
>
> Astra inclinant, non necessitant. - Albinus
> Aequam memento rebus in arduis servare mentem. - Horace
> MMDCCLVIII Anno urbis conditae (AUC)
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34862 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Stirps and Re: Roman Names
Salvete,

Roman names are an area I have not really studied in depth. But here is a sketch of my understanding and question. Already in Republican times it appears the "classic three name" formula was already too simple in some cases. The person I picked to be named after had two cognomina as a "stirps" off the gens Sempronius -- namely Atratinus, Regulus.

It is my understanding that a gens could have a stirps. But it also seems a stirps could itself have its own stirps, yes? For example, the gens Cornelia, for example, developed stirps of the Scipiones, and this in turn the stirpsof the Nasicae. So we find the fourfold name Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica. Is this correct?

Tibi gratias,



A. Sempronius Atratinus Regulus

Astra inclinant, non necessitant. - Albinus
Aequam memento rebus in arduis servare mentem. - Horace
MMDCCLVIII Anno urbis conditae (AUC)


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34863 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: Reproduction Roman Furniture
SALVE !

I don't know a maker for reproduction Roman furniture, but, if this
can help you, in links section from our NR ML, you can find some
links about roman furniture, posted by Julilla Sempronia Magna.

OPTIME VALE,
IVL SABINVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Aulus Sempronius Regulus
<a_sempronius_regulus@y...> wrote:
>
> Salvete,
>
> Is there a recommended US maker of reproduction Roman furniture?
>
> I discovered a couple of British and Italian merchants but import
to US
> cost more than I would like to pay.
>
> I already have some pieces copied by the Amish but they can't make
> it if I don't have something to copy. I am, in particular, looking
for
> candelaria and chairs.
>
> Tibi gratias,
>
>
>
> A. Sempronius Atratinus Regulus
>
> Astra inclinant, non necessitant. - Albinus
> Aequam memento rebus in arduis servare mentem. - Horace
> MMDCCLVIII Anno urbis conditae (AUC)
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34864 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: Stirps and Re: Roman Names
Salve,
While doing some searching for more info on the Servilii I ran across this
site "The Ancient Library" at
http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-bio/ it had so much info on the Servilii
it's running out of my ears.
You might want to check this out.

Quintus Servilius Fidenas



On 4/17/05, Aulus Sempronius Regulus <a_sempronius_regulus@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Salvete,
>
> Roman names are an area I have not really studied in depth. But here is a
> sketch of my understanding and question. Already in Republican times it
> appears the "classic three name" formula was already too simple in some
> cases. The person I picked to be named after had two cognomina as a "stirps"
> off the gens Sempronius -- namely Atratinus, Regulus.
>
> It is my understanding that a gens could have a stirps. But it also seems
> a stirps could itself have its own stirps, yes? For example, the gens
> Cornelia, for example, developed stirps of the Scipiones, and this in turn
> the stirpsof the Nasicae. So we find the fourfold name Publius Cornelius
> Scipio Nasica. Is this correct?
>
> Tibi gratias,
>
> A. Sempronius Atratinus Regulus
>
> Astra inclinant, non necessitant. - Albinus
> Aequam memento rebus in arduis servare mentem. - Horace
> MMDCCLVIII Anno urbis conditae (AUC)
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34865 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: LUDI CERIALES - Battle Against Carthago! - Temporary Results
AVE SABINE

> Who is Titus Flavius Sabinus ?

That's your alter ego which will be persecuting you for the next ten
years Ludi!!!
Sorry. Of course that's Iulius ;-)

OPTIME VALE
Serapio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34866 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: Oxyrhynchus Papyri
Salvete,
I would, personally, like to get a year to rummage around the old imperial library of Byzantium. It is to the Byzantines that we owe a major debt for preserving most of the classics of antiquity we know about (the Eastern empire did not go through a "dark ages"), and those are mostly the ones brought to northern Italy shortly before and after the fall of Constantinople in 1453 by Byzantine emigres/refugees. The imperial list/inventory (inaccuracy was death-penalty for the Muslim Turks) of the library catalogue turned over from the Christian librarian to the Sultan's new librarian lists many ancient works we don't have. And yes, the library still exists to this day.

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_technology/story.jsp?story=630165

Salvete Quirites,

At the link I've posted above you can read about the Oxyrhynchus Papyri, and
how they are being read even now using infrared techniques.

"In the past four days alone, Oxford's classicists have used it to make a
series of astonishing discoveries, including writing by Sophocles, Euripides,
Hesiod and other literary giants of the ancient world, lost for millennia.
They even believe they are likely to find lost Christian gospels, the
originals of which were written around the time of the earliest books of the
New Testament."

This looks quite promising.

Valete,

-- Marinus


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



A. Sempronius Atratinus Regulus

Astra inclinant, non necessitant. - Albinus
Aequam memento rebus in arduis servare mentem. - Horace
MMDCCLVIII Anno urbis conditae (AUC)



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34867 From: Julilla Sempronia Magna Date: 2005-04-17
Subject: Re: Reproduction Roman Furniture
I bookmarked this site a while back. They sell to dealers only, but
there are several pieces that, while not strictly reproductions, are
very tempting!

http://www.accintl.com/c99.htm

--
Julilla Sempronia Magna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34870 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-18
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - Chariot Races - SEMIFINALS
AVETE OMNES

Hello folk! The end of the Ludi Ceriales is approaching and the four
Factiones of the chariot races want to get the first place in the
Games! Welcome to a new day of thrilling races and excitement as the
first semifinal is about to begin. Today it will be decided which of
the competing chariots will make it to the upcoming final of
tomorrow!
The weather for today simply couldn't be better!
Let's start!

----------------------SEMIFINALS--------------------

Race 1

Tiberius Annaeus Otho
Driver: Septimius Raurax
Chariot: Basilea
Factio: Praesina
----------------------
Quintus Vitellius Triarius Vopiscus
Driver: Clarus Belliucs
Chariot: Puteulanus Relevo
Factio: Veneta
-------------------------
Titus Iulius Sabinus
Driver: Celeris
Chariot: Aprilis
Factio: Russata
----------------------
Caius Curius Saturninus
Driver: Euthymius
Chariot: Inexpugnabilis III
Factio: Praesina

The spectators' anticipation rises.
Down at the starting-line the competitors are getting ready. At the
innermost lane stands the chariot Basilea, owned by Tiberius Annaeus
Otho, who competes for Factio Praesina. His driver is the skilled
Septimius Raurax. Next to him stands the chariot Puteulanus Relevo,
owned by Quintus Vitellius Triarius, who competes for factio Veneta.
Then we see the chariot Aprilis, driven by Celeris and owned by
Titus Iulius Sabinus for Factio Russata. Next to him on the
outermost lane we find the champion of the Ludi Megalenses,
Inexpugnabilis III, driven by Euthymius and owned by Illustris Caius
Curius Saturninus for factio Praesina.

As the participators are taking their places along the starting-line
the crowd goes silent and awaits the start with great anticipation.
When the chariots finally take off the circus completely explodes in
a roaring symphony of voices as the spectators cheers on their
favorites. Puteulanus gets a nice start and gets a small advantage
over Basilea and Inexpugnabilis III. The gravel spatters under the
hoofs of the strained horses as the drivers are pushing their
chariots to the limit. The
spectators are totally ecstatic and their loud cheers are almost
deafening. Puteulanus is now engaged in a close struggle with
Aprilis and it seems as if Inexpugnabilis III and Basilea have lost
a few yards to the
duo. As always Puteulanus tries to push his opponend against the
wall of the circus, but the driver of Aprilis is not that stupid and
manages to avoid the attacks. Puteulanus is still in a tiny lead
before Aprilis, but now Basilea has gained some to them both.
Aprilis attacks Puteulanus and the supporters of factio Russata goes
crazy on the terraces. Will he make it passed the strong Puteulanus?
The supporters of factio Veneta surely hopes not, and they are
cheering loud for Puteulanus as the chariots comes up towards the
finishing line.
Here they are! As the last lap begins the driver of Inexpugnabilis
III casts a glance at Septimius Raurax, driver of the other green
chariot, Basilea. They start hurrying!
Puteulanus and Aprilis are struggling side by side as the goal comes
up closer and closer.
They get passed by the green couple! Puteulanus doesn't intend to
give up and tries for the last time to get rid of Aprilis by pushing
it against the wall. What??? A supporter of the red chariot gets
really angry and throws one of his caligae at the driver of
Puteulanus. Clarus Bellicus falls down, the horses of the blue
chariot slow down. Aprilis thanks and sets off in pursuit of the
green chariot, but it's too late! Basilea and Inexpugnabilis III
pass the finish-line! Aprilis ends up on a third place.
On the terraces we can see the supporters of factio Praesina jumping
up and down in a delirium of joy as both their chariots Basilea and
Inexpugnabilis III make it to the final!
Meanwhile, Censor Gnaeus Equitius Marinus sniggers by seeing the
failure of Clarus Bellicus, which destroyed his chariot in the
Quarters: "I did tell you that actions have consequences!".

Also, that's the end of the chariot races for Factio Russata. All of
its chariots have been defeated.

Results:
1st Basilea
2nd Inexpugnabilis III
3th Aprilis
4th Puteulanus Relevo

Qualify for the final: Basilea and Inexpugnabilis III

------------------------------------


Race 2

Lucius Vitellius Triarius
Driver: Felix Celeris
Chariot: Velox Puteulanus Sors
Factio: Veneta
----------------------
Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus
Driver: Fartus Galningius
Chariot: Fulmen Boreae
Factio: Albata
-------------------------
Titus Licinius Crassus
Driver: Equus Magnus
Chariot: Orionis Draco
Factio: Veneta
----------------------
Marca Hortensia Maior
Driver: Herodias
Chariot: Stella Iudeae
Factio: Praesina


The sun is setting and horses paw. The prize is the
qualification for the finals, and the drivers would do everything to
see their name in the history of the Ludi.
Fartus Galningius is the only white player and wants to honour his
factio.
At the innermost lane stands the chariot Velox Puteulanus Sors,
owned by Lucius Vitellius Triarius, who competes for Factio Veneta.
His driver is the Felix Celeris. Next to him stands the chariot
Fulmen Boreae, owned by Titus Octavius Pius, who competes for factio
Albata. Then we see the chariot Orionis Draco, driven by Equus
Magnus and owned by Titus Licinius Crassus for Factio Veneta. Next
to him on the outermost lane we find Stella Iudeae, driven by
Herodias and owned by Illustris Marca Hortensia Maior for factio
Praesina.
After the signal the chariots start! The fastest one is Equus
Magnus. His chariot Orionis Draco stakes everything on its quickness.
But during the first lap you can already understand how violent the
race will be. Fulmen Boreae reaches the first one and tries to push
him
against the wall. Equus Magnus creeps along the wall, looses the
control but manages to keep the chariot on the track, even though
now he's the third one.
Stella Iudeae is unrestrained. It approaches Fulmen Boreae while
trying to pass the curve closely to the spina and the wheels cross.
It's just a matter of strength, or maybe of luck.
Spectators near the track scream each time the chariots pass, while
the others exult and ask for blood.
What a great race, folk! Who will have the strongest horses?
Herodias asks his horses for a last effort and at the following
curve Stella Iudea manages to take the lead of the race! Hey! The
horses of the white chariot become restive after Herodias' manoeuvre
and Fartus Galningius has to suddenly stop them! BUT Orionis Draco
is just behind him! The blue driver tries to avoid Fulmen Boreae but
hits one of its wheels. Orionis Draco slows down but luckily enough
there is no damage. Velox Puteulanus Sors takes advantage of the
situation to pass Orionis Draco!!! Fulmen Boreae's wheel is too
damaged. That's the end of the race for the white chariot.
Orionis Draco tries to catch up but Velox Puteulanus Sors is now in
hot pursuit of the green Stella Iudeae, whose horses are now
exausted. It's easy for Velox to reach Stella Iudeae. First it tries
to overtake the green chariot from the left side, then from the
right one. Herodias doesn't want to give up, but his horses are too
tired, while those of the blue driver still have plenty of strength.
Velox Puteulanus finally manages to take the lead and wins! Stella
Iudeae is second. Orionis Draco third. Velox Puteulanus and Stella
Iudeae make it to the final!

On the contrary, that's the end of the chariot races for Factio
Albata, as all of its chariot have been defeated.

Results:
1st – Velox Puteulanus Sors
2nd – Stella Iudeae
3rd – Orionis Draco
4th – Fulmen Boreae (Accident)

Qualify for the Final: Velox Puteulanus and Stella Iudeae

What Finals we're having! Three green chariots against one blue one!
The Greens will give a party for their three drivers. Factio Veneta
is also very happy as they have the opportunity to win the chariot
races of the Ludi Ceriales.

Total classified:
-Praesina: 3 (Basilea, Inexpugnabilis III, Stella Iudeae)
-Veneta: 1 (Velox Puteulanus Sors)


Tomorrow the Final!!!

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34871 From: Lucia Cassia Silvana Date: 2005-04-18
Subject: Cerialia foxes?
Salvete! I'm wondering if anyone has done any research into the
possible reasons behind the loosing of foxes into the Circus at the
end of the Cerialia? If there are any new writings/ideas about why that
was done? I've read Cato's posting on the story relayed by Publius
Ovidius Naso and some thoughts from others about it (warding off of
fires or corn blight, etc.) but wondered if any citizens here had
researched/written on the topic. I ask because as I wandered through
the forest today and took my rest at the edge of the airfield where
there are presently vast acres of dry golden grass, I saw a brilliant
golden-red fox sprinting through it. :)

Valete!
Cassia Silvana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34872 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-04-18
Subject: Re: Stirps and Re: Roman Names
A. Apollonius A. Sempronio omnibusque sal.

> Roman names are an area I have not really studied in
> depth. But here is a sketch of my understanding and
> question. Already in Republican times it appears the
> "classic three name" formula was already too simple
> in some cases. The person I picked to be named after
> had two cognomina as a "stirps" off the gens
> Sempronius -- namely Atratinus, Regulus.

If Sempronius Atratinus Regulus was a magistrate
during the republic, he's not in Broughton. Was he a
private citizen? I can find a number of Sempronii
Atratini, but no Atratini Reguli.

> It is my understanding that a gens could have a
> stirps. But it also seems a stirps could itself have
> its own stirps, yes? For example, the gens Cornelia,
> for example, developed stirps of the Scipiones, and
> this in turn the stirpsof the Nasicae. So we find
> the fourfold name Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica.
> Is this correct?

Yes, and it could go even further (e.g. P. Cornelius
P. f. P. n. Scipio Nasica Corculum and his
contemporary P. Cornelius P. f. P. n. Scipio Nasica
Serapio). But very few people had more than three
names until the late republic.

I would urge you to content yourself with the usual
three names. Adding an extra cognomen was usually only
done in ancient times when a stirps contained so many
people that several of them had identical names and
needed to be distinguished. Since your stirps contains
only one person, there's no danger that you will be
confused with anyone else. And if you start with four
names, what will happen in future generations of your
line? Five, six, seven names? Your great-grandchildren
might take several minutes to introduce themselves! :)

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34873 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-04-18
Subject: Re: Oxyrhynchus Papyri
A. Apollonius Cn. Equitio amico omnibusque sal.

> "In the past four days alone, Oxford's classicists
> have used it to make a
> series of astonishing discoveries, including writing
> by Sophocles, Euripides,
> Hesiod and other literary giants of the ancient
> world, lost for millennia....

Of course no one would turn up his nose at more
Sophocles and Euripides, but I'd gladly swap them for
even a single complete text of a tragedy by Ennius or Pacuvius.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34874 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-04-18
Subject: Re: Oxyrhynchus Papyri
Salve Corde,

"A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...> writes:

> Of course no one would turn up his nose at more
> Sophocles and Euripides, but I'd gladly swap them for
> even a single complete text of a tragedy by Ennius or Pacuvius.

Let's see what else turns up in the papyri. I agree it would be wonderful if
such a thing were to be found.

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34875 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-04-18
Subject: LUDI CERIALES - De Romanis Illustribus #7 (LAST ONE!)
AVETE OMNES

The answer to the sixth sentence was "Marcus Claudius Marcellus". He
attacked Syracuse, but was foiled by the city's chief architect,
Archimedes, one of the foremost engineers of antiquity. His ferrea
manus (Iron Hand, apparently a large lever with a grappling hook
attached to the end of a chain) foiled Marcellus' 60 galleys.

Now we have one sole citizen leading the game, and this is the last
day of "De Romanis Illustribus"!

The temporary results are:

-Publius Constantinus Placidus – 12 points

-Servia Iulia Caesaris Metelliana – 11 points

-Caius Sentius Maximianus Caesar – 10 points
-Gnaeus Equitius Marinus – 10 points
-Julilla Sempronia Magna – 10 points

-Titus Iulius Sabinus – 9 points

-Caius Ianus Flaminius – 8 points
-Lucia Cassia Silvana – 8 points
-Sextus Apollonius Scipio – 8 points
-Lucius Rutilius Minervalis – 8 points
-Marcus Arminius Maior – 8 points

-Flavia Tullia Scholastica – 6 points
-Marcus Iulius Perusianus – 6 points

-Gaius Equitius Cato – 5 points

-Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Pius – 4 points

-Servia Adriana Marcella – 2 points
-Marca Hortensia Maior – 2 points

-Marcus Cassius Peregrinus – 1 point



And now the last sentence of "De Romanis Illustribus":

7- As secretary of a great orator, he could do nothing but inventing
stenography!
Who was he?

If you think you know who the sentence refers to, send an e-mail
with the answer and your roman name to
mcserapio AT yahoo DOT it.
In the subject line please write "DE ROMANIS ILLUSTRIBUS"
You have 24 hours to do it.

OPTIME VALETE
Manivs Constantinvs Serapio
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 34876 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2005-04-18
Subject: Non-Fire Public Sacrifice/Re: [Nova-Roma] Cerialia foxes?
Salvete,

Although not everything is known about the practice, the Roman context (in light of the Indo-European context without having to interpolate IE aspects, in this case) sheds some light on the meaning.

First, a look at the Indo-European linguistics of Ceres. Her name derives from the same Latin root as cresco and creare. She is, in name, derived from the Indo-European *ker, or growth as a person or beginning, stimulating impulse. The archaic Latin roots ties her to Janus. Just as Janus is "cerus", "ceres manus" and "ceres bonus" in terms of public order (religion, peace and war) of humans, so Ceres is in the cult of the field -- agri-cult- agriculture. Some older scholars posited Janus as Ceres consort but most scholars reject that in light of better evidence.

Second, as the cult of Telus and Ceres become closer in nature and in the calendar, [the old Cerialia of 19 April becomes a festival starting on 12 April, with the Fordicidia coming days later on the 15), both the Ceres and Tellus are sacrificed a pregnant cow. But this is a later (although quite early, imposition of the Tellus cult onto the Ceres cult). Ceres, as growth personified, in archaic times did not take a sacrifice taking a life. Rather, as stimulator, her sacrifice was to create excitement, stimulus, ceres bonus. The original and archaic bloodless sacrifice of Ceres (before the sacrifice of the pregnant cow to Tellus bacame part of both cults) was one with those foxes.

The Ludi of 19 April, where foxes are released with torches tied to their tails in the Circus is to creare a commotion, stir things up, while separating the boundary between the wild (Diana, Mars, Faunus, Fauns) and the domesticated (Minerva, Ceres, Silvanus, Lares). The grains are already stimulated -- the foxes with their tails on fire -- are tied to Mars (also warlike protector of the fields from ravage, the Semones (spirits or sprites or elves, ??? of growth), the Lares (spirits of the place), and their release causes the stir, the commotion, the hazard, the stimulus of the ancillary forces of growth that require domestic order, a marking between domesticated (Slivanus) and wild (Faunus) while stimulating the Semones and Lares to their renewed roles in growing crops and protecting fields. In essence, letting the foxes go with fire on their tails was the non-death sacrifice that got the slumbering forces assisting domesticated growth and protecting domestic fields and cultivation
awakened and off their spiritual duff. It is also indicated this was considered a triple circumambulatio of the pagus.

Valete,

Lucia Cassia Silvana <lucia_silvana@...> wrote:


Salvete! I'm wondering if anyone has done any research into the
possible reasons behind the loosing of foxes into the Circus at the
end of the Cerialia? If there are any new writings/ideas about why that
was done? I've read Cato's posting on the story relayed by Publius
Ovidius Naso and some thoughts from others about it (warding off of
fires or corn blight, etc.) but wondered if any citizens here had
researched/written on the topic. I ask because as I wandered through
the forest today and took my rest at the edge of the airfield where
there are presently vast acres of dry golden grass, I saw a brilliant
golden-red fox sprinting through it. :)

Valete!
Cassia Silvana









---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



A. Sempronius Atratinus Regulus

Astra inclinant, non necessitant. - Albinus
Aequam memento rebus in arduis servare mentem. - Horace
MMDCCLVIII Anno urbis conditae (AUC)


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]