Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Aug 9-17, 2005

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36987 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-08-09
Subject: Re: Roman Dinner Ware
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36988 From: FAC Date: 2005-08-09
Subject: the last dau of the conventus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36989 From: Maior Date: 2005-08-09
Subject: Re: the last dau of the conventus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36990 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Re: the last dau of the conventus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36991 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Re: the last dau of the conventus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36992 From: FL Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: swear
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36994 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Re: the last dau of the conventus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36995 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Re: LEO GENN CENTENARY TODAY - Leo Genn was born 100 years ago today
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36996 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Ancient Greek Artillary Technology from Catapults To Architronion C
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36997 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Re: LEO GENN CENTENARY TODAY - Leo Genn was born 100 years ago today
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36998 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Re: LEO GENN CENTENARY TODAY - Leo Genn was born 100 years ago today
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36999 From: Michael Kelly Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Fw: Ecology In The Roman Empire
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37001 From: Euphemia Cassia Mercuria Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Re: Roman Dinner Ware
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37002 From: Julia Passamonti-Colamartino Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Re: Roman Dinner Ware-How to Order
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37003 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: Conventus update
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37005 From: FAC Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: the last dau of the conventus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37006 From: FAC Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: Conventus update
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37007 From: FAC Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37008 From: FAC Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37009 From: FAC Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: Tribunes Report
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37010 From: FAC Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Roman dinner at Conventus in Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37011 From: Jack the Ripper Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Rif: [Nova-Roma] Re: the last dau of the conventus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37012 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: the last dau of the conventus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37013 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: the last dau of the conventus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37014 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37015 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: LEO GENN CENTENARY TODAY - Leo Genn was born 100 years ago today
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37016 From: Maior Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: the last dau of the conventus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37017 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37018 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: "Rome" Mini Series
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37019 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37020 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37021 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37022 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: the last dau of the conventus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37023 From: Aestiva Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Ant: Rif: [Nova-Roma] Re: the last dau of the conventus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37024 From: laelia_laeta Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Oath of office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37025 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Gallia - EP XXXVI - About the official website
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37026 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37027 From: Dan Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37028 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37029 From: Maior Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37030 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: Conventus update
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37031 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION (The Bright Side)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37032 From: Sempronia Graccha Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Iuro
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37033 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Farewell from Outgoing Propraetor Of America Medioccidentalis Super
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37034 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37035 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37037 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Conventus Flashbacks (II)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37038 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37039 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37040 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37041 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37042 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37043 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Absence
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37044 From: mfalco1 Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37045 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37046 From: Dan Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37047 From: GAIVS IVLIANVS Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: BONA NEMORALIA!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37048 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37050 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37051 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Conventus update
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37052 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Conventus update
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37053 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Conventus update
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37054 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37055 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37056 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37057 From: Marcus Horatius Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Roman spirituality
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37058 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37061 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: From the Archives of the Sodalis Coq et Coq
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37062 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37063 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37066 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: THE HOUSE OF JULIUS POLYBIUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37068 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37071 From: Marcus Iulius Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Inoltra: [conventus2758] Some pics from the Conventus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37072 From: Lucius Modius Kaelus Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37073 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37074 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37075 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Roman spirituality
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37076 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Inoltra: [conventus2758] Some pics from the Conventus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37077 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: the last day of the conventus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37078 From: Appia Claudia Laterana Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: In favour of Cato's Calendar.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37079 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Inoltra: [conventus2758] Some pics from the Conventus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37080 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Inoltra: [conventus2758] Some pics from the Conventus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37081 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Conventus Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37082 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37083 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Contio: Lex Popillia Senatoria
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37084 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Contio: Lex Popillia Senatoria
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37085 From: Stefanie Beer Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] The Calendar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37086 From: Judy Ridgley Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: The Calendar (WAS Re:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37088 From: Judy Ridgley Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Iuro
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37089 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37090 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37091 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37092 From: Lucius Modius Kaelus Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37094 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2005-08-14
Subject: [conventus2758] Some pics from the Conventus:let's try again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37095 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-14
Subject: Re: [conventus2758] Some pics from the Conventus:let's try again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37096 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-08-14
Subject: Re: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] The Calendar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37097 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-14
Subject: Latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37098 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-08-14
Subject: Re: Latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37099 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-14
Subject: David Meadows Explorator 8.16 August 14, 2005
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37100 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-14
Subject: From David Meadows Explorator 8.16 August 14, 2005
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37101 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-14
Subject: From the Archives of the Sodalis Coq et Coq 3
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37103 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37104 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Redivimus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37105 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: ave
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37106 From: Lucia Cassia Silvana Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37107 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37108 From: laurent_coffre@bat.com Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37109 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37110 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37111 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37112 From: Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Laws and their effect on the Census
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37113 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37114 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATESESSION)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37115 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATESESSION)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37116 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: Redivimus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37117 From: Reccanello Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: The Calendar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37118 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATESESSION)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37119 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Constitutions and By-Laws
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37120 From: Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Nemoralia, August 13-15
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37121 From: Samantha Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Salvete and Nemoralia and Vesta
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37122 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: Constitutions and By-Laws
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37123 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: Constitutions and By-Laws
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37124 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37125 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: Constitutions and By-Laws
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37126 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: [conventus2758] Some pics from the Conventus:let's try again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37127 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Virtual Model of Ostia Antica: Ostia Antica - the harbour of Ancien
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37128 From: Marcus Iulius Severus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: PLEASE, CATO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37129 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37130 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: incorporate in a state with less ...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37131 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: incorporate in a state with less ...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37132 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Appointment of Scriba
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37133 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37134 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: incorporate in a state with less ...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37135 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: incorporate in a state with less ...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37136 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: incorporate in a state with less ...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37137 From: Titus Arminius Genialis Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Leaving Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37138 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: Leaving Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37139 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: Appointment of Scriba
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37140 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATESESSION)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37142 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATESESSION)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37143 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATESESSION)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37144 From: Marcus Quirinus Sulla Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: conventus-photos
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37145 From: Reccanello Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: Leaving Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37146 From: marciusfelix Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Cato and Calendar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37147 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Some thoughts about eliminating the Constitution
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37148 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: conventus-photos
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37149 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: Some thoughts about eliminating the Constitution
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37150 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: Some thoughts about eliminating the Constitution
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37151 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATESESSION)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37152 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Pictures from the Conventus #2
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37153 From: Marcus Quirinus Sulla Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: photo conventus II posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37154 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37155 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: Pictures from the Conventus #2
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37156 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: Some thoughts about eliminating the Constitution
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37157 From: Lucius Modius Kaelus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: Salvete and Nemoralia and Vesta
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37158 From: Lucius Modius Kaelus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: incorporate in a state with less ...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37159 From: Lucius Modius Kaelus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: Pictures from the Conventus #2
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37161 From: Aestiva Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Ant: [Nova-Roma] photo conventus II posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37162 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: "Latin for the current debate" returns
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37163 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: The Calendar Source Material
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37164 From: Appia Claudia Laterana Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: The Calendar Source Material
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37165 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: "Latin for the current debate" returns
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37166 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: "Latin for the current debate" returns
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37167 From: Cnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: LEO GENN CENTENARY - Leo Genn was born 100 years ago
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37168 From: LVCIVS.CASSIVS.BIBACVLVS Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: eradicating the Constitution
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37169 From: LVCIVS.CASSIVS.BIBACVLVS Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: eradicating the Constitution
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37170 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: eradicating the Constitution
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37171 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: eradicating the Constitution
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37172 From: Gaius Aemilius Papinianus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: eradicating the Constitution
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37173 From: Richard Behnen Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: eradicating the Constitution
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37174 From: Richard Behnen Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: eradicating the Constitution
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37175 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: eradicating the Constitution
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37176 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Pictures from the Conventus #3
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37177 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: eradicating the Constitution
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37178 From: Richard Behnen Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: eradicating the Constitution
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37179 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: eradicating the Constitution



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36987 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-08-09
Subject: Re: Roman Dinner Ware
Salve, Q. Lani Pauline, et salvete, omnes!

> Salvete Flavia Scholastica et Gai Hadriane!
>
> Thank you for the link which I shall check out. Sounds great to me.
>
> Regards,
>
> QLP
>
Flocci est! Julia really does do a nice job on her pottery--and the
pocula, a good 8 oz. size, I believe, are only $8--for handmade Samian ware.
TGP nearly bought her out at Roman Market Days 2004. She's a lovely,
accommodating person, and I recommend her work highly.

Vale, et valete,

A.Tullia Scholastica


>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix
> <c.minucius.hadrianus@n...> wrote:
>> Salvete,
>>
>> I purchased an excellent red samian ware bowl from Julia at Roman
> Market
>> Days which I use as my patera. I highly recommend her products. I
> plan
>> on ordering some more items from her soon. Her studio's website is
> at:
>> http://venetiancat.com/
>>
>> Valete bene,
>>
>> Hadrianus
>>
>>
>> Flavia Scholastica wrote:
>>
>>> Salve, Quinte Lani Pauline, et salvete, omnes!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Salvete omnes,
>>>>
>>>> I remember about a year ago one of our lady citizens was going
> to make
>>>> some replica Ancient Roman dishes and utensils that we could
> order. I
>>>> don't see anything in the marcellum yet so I am wondering if she
> is
>>>> still around or has her own site with these items.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Could you possibly mean Julia Passamonti of Venetian Cat
> pottery? She
>>> comes to the eastern U.S. reenactment events, and has quite a
> batterie de
>>> cuisine. I have a nice poculum from her, as do many of our Eastern
>>> reenactors. There is also a glassblower who attended this year.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Vale, et valete,
>>>
>>> A. Tullia Scholastica
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36988 From: FAC Date: 2005-08-09
Subject: the last dau of the conventus
salvete omnes,
greetings from Rome and the Novae Romae COnventus!
I'm writing you all in the last day of the Conventus and I'm very sad
because it's going to accomplish himself. But I'm very happy because I
spent wonderful and exciting days with all the nova romans present here.

I don't forgotten the eloquentia and the Ny style of Quaestor Cato
(form Mediatalntica), the simpathy of Agricola (from Japan), the
knowledge of Cordus, the sweetness of Propraetor Livia (from Britannia)
and Aestiva (from Austria), the discussions with Prometheus and Romeo
(from Dacia), the funny moment with Astur (from Hispania) .... and
Severa, Lupus, Tribunus Albucius, the spanish and english and romanian
nova romans.
And I would send my best wishes to my italian friends Praetor
Perusianus, Aedile Sulla, Aelius Marullinus, the young Alectus, Vesta
and his wife, etc.
A special thanks for Senator Manius Costantinus Serapio, the mind and
the aim of this wonderful meeting. He spent many time and energy to
serve our guests as well as possible and he merits all my
congratulations and admiration.

Thank you all very much!

Today is the last day, the nova romans are going for the dinner in
Trastevere after a long and tiring day. We visited the Park of
Caffarella within the sacred wood, the temple of st. Urbanus, etc., the
roman acqueducts, the Villa of Quintili, the 5th and 6th miles of the
Ancient APpia way, the circus of Massentius and the big monument of
Caecilia Metella.
Yesterday the partecipants visited the Coloseum, the Palatine and the
Domus Aurea. Unlucly I arrived later and I visited the Domus Aurea
alone... :-(
But the most exciting day was the last Sunday, the Dies ROmanus. It was
in Villa Panphjli and the Provincia Italia organized a special meerint.
Wine with "cocomero", lunch, visit to a temple and a full afternoon of
discussions about NR and its Provinciae. Cato had a wonderful idea, the
reconstruction of a Contio with call of the citizens, pray and forum.
We talked about the main list, the services offered by Nr, etc. The
experiment was great!

So, your Consul have to go at the restaurant, he need to eat ;-)

Tomorrow averybody will leave Rome with the wonderful images of the
Eternal City in the own mind.

P.S.: the photod coming as soon as possible

Salvete Omnes

Fr. Apulus Caesar
Senior Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36989 From: Maior Date: 2005-08-09
Subject: Re: the last dau of the conventus
Salve Caesar;
I am crying from the most terrible envy!!! It sounds so
fabulous and I admire so many of our cives coming from everywhere -
the U.S. Japan!, Austria, Romania, It's an inspiration to us all.
Save up Romans;-
. And the great visits, oh how I would sell my soul to have some
wine with you and visit the Domus Aurea:)

My congratulations to Senator Serapio, for putting so much effort
into making Nova Roma the wonderful real organization we dreamed
about. bene vale in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior



Unlucly I arrived later and I visited the Domus Aurea
> alone... :-(
> But the most exciting day was the last Sunday, the Dies ROmanus.
It was
> in Villa Panphjli and the Provincia Italia organized a special
meerint.
> Wine with "cocomero", lunch, visit to a temple and a full
afternoon of
> discussions about NR and its Provinciae. Cato had a wonderful
idea, the
> reconstruction of a Contio with call of the citizens, pray and
forum.
> We talked about the main list, the services offered by Nr, etc.
The
> experiment was great!
>
> So, your Consul have to go at the restaurant, he need to eat ;-)
>
> Tomorrow averybody will leave Rome with the wonderful images of
the
> Eternal City in the own mind.
>
> P.S.: the photod coming as soon as possible
>
> Salvete Omnes
>
> Fr. Apulus Caesar
> Senior Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36990 From: L. Didius Geminus Sceptius Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Re: the last dau of the conventus
Salvete

You're not the only one, Maior, because I feel really unhappy for
not being there. I know there are about 10 hispanici enjoying of the
roman hospitality from our citizens of Italia... and having a great
time seeing the wonders of the Caput Mundi. And I'm here, working...

Well, I hope posts soon will be floading the lists, telling us
about. By the way, what was the funny thing about Astur? "A funny
thing happened in the way to the Forum"? :-P

vale,

L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
HISPANIA

PS: Pictures, pictures!!! :-D

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> Salve Caesar;
> I am crying from the most terrible envy!!! It sounds so
> fabulous and I admire so many of our cives coming from everywhere -

> the U.S. Japan!, Austria, Romania, It's an inspiration to us all.
> Save up Romans;-
> . And the great visits, oh how I would sell my soul to have some
> wine with you and visit the Domus Aurea:)
>
> My congratulations to Senator Serapio, for putting so much effort
> into making Nova Roma the wonderful real organization we dreamed
> about. bene vale in pacem deorum
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
>
>
> Unlucly I arrived later and I visited the Domus Aurea
> > alone... :-(
> > But the most exciting day was the last Sunday, the Dies ROmanus.
> It was
> > in Villa Panphjli and the Provincia Italia organized a special
> meerint.
> > Wine with "cocomero", lunch, visit to a temple and a full
> afternoon of
> > discussions about NR and its Provinciae. Cato had a wonderful
> idea, the
> > reconstruction of a Contio with call of the citizens, pray and
> forum.
> > We talked about the main list, the services offered by Nr, etc.
> The
> > experiment was great!
> >
> > So, your Consul have to go at the restaurant, he need to eat ;-)
> >
> > Tomorrow averybody will leave Rome with the wonderful images of
> the
> > Eternal City in the own mind.
> >
> > P.S.: the photod coming as soon as possible
> >
> > Salvete Omnes
> >
> > Fr. Apulus Caesar
> > Senior Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36991 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Re: the last dau of the conventus
Salvete Amici et Quirites!

Here is one more. ;-) I am very sad to not being
able to be there. I love the Eternal City and
really wish I was there to meet all citizens
present. I have sent them an official message as
Senior Censor telling all participants how much I
want to be there and that I hope the Conventus
will be a serious step forward for Nova Roma.

Now I am just waiting for the invitation to the
next Conventus in Roma Aeterna. ;-)

While waiting I will certainly try to go to the
Conventus in Provincia Britannia next year.

>Salvete
>
>You're not the only one, Maior, because I feel really unhappy for
>not being there. I know there are about 10 hispanici enjoying of the
>roman hospitality from our citizens of Italia... and having a great
>time seeing the wonders of the Caput Mundi. And I'm here, working...
>
>Well, I hope posts soon will be floading the lists, telling us
>about. By the way, what was the funny thing about Astur? "A funny
>thing happened in the way to the Forum"? :-P
>
>vale,
>
>L·DIDIVS·GEMINVS·SCEPTIVS
>HISPANIA
>
>PS: Pictures, pictures!!! :-D

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36992 From: FL Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: swear
Tiberius Petrus Bellangus,
Scriba Propraetoris Pannoniae Novae Romae



Ego, Tiberius Petrus Bellangus, hac re ipsa decus Novae Romae me defensurum, et semper pro populo senatuque Novae Romae acturum esse sollemniter IVRO.

Ego, Tiberius Petrus Bellangus, officio Scriba Propraetoris Pannoniae Novae Romae accepto, deos deasque Romae in omnibus meae vitae publicae temporibus culturum, et virtutes Romanas publica privataque vita me persecuturum esse IVRO.

Ego, Tiberius Petrus Bellangus, Religioni Romanae me fauturum et eam defensurum, et numquam contra eius statum publicum me acturum esse, ne quid detrimenti capiat IVRO.

Ego, Tiberius Petrus Bellangus officiis muneris Scriba Proppraetoris Pannoniae me quam optime functurum esse praeterea IVRO.

Meo civis Novae Romae honore, coram deis deabusque populi Romani, et voluntate favoreque eorum, ego munus Scriba Propraetoris Pannoniae una cum iuribus, privilegiis, muneribus et officiis comitantibus ACCIPIO.



I, Tiberius Petrus Bellangus do hereby solemnly swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Tiberius Petrus Bellangus swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Tiberius Petrus Bellangus swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Tiberius Petrus Bellangus swear to protect and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Tiberius Petrus Bellangus further swear to fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of Scriba Propraetoris Pannoniae to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept the position of_Scriba Propraetris Pannoniae and all the rights, privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.


________
Vsetko o technologiach + kazdy tyzden sutaz o ceny. http://pc.sme.sk
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36994 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Re: the last dau of the conventus
G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.

Salvete omnes!

Well. I've just come from seeing Apollonius Cordus, Fabia Livia, and
Gladius Agricola off to the Termini train station on their way back
home from Rome.

I've got a couple of days left before heading back to New York;
Moravius Laureatus and I are planning to meet in the morning and go to
the Vatican Museums, and Constantinus Fuscus has offered to shepherd
me around a bit as well, an offer which I plan to take him up on.

It would be almost impossible (but not quite, which is why I'm writing
this) to describe what an incredible job Provincia Italia --- and
specifically Serapio --- did at this Conventus. The food was
excellent, the wine delicious, the sights unparallelled, and the most
important part: seeing each other face to face.

At every possible moment you could wander from bunch of citizens to
bunch of citizens and hear people talking about the res publica, the
history of Rome, the origins of their Roman names --- and get
embroiled in discussions that might have taken months over this
medium, but when speaking directly to each other (sometimes shouting,
with much hand-waving and cries of exasperation), ended up two hours
later pouring wine all around and laughing until tears ran down our faces.

Sulla and Perusianus presented projects that they are working on in
Provincia Italia, and representatives of each Provincia gave a short
speech about what is happening on their home fronts. We had a contio;
a meeting which followed pretty much exactly the ancient Republican
form, at which the Consul Caesar called for the People to attend him
and voice their minds. The Aedile Serapio conveyed this message to
the People, and after a brief prayer asking the gods to make
everything we spoke of be of benefit to the Republic, the magistrates
and senators stood before the People, and we talked to each other. It
was phenomenal to watch the interaction of the People, both
magistrates and non-magistrates, as we spoke passionately about our
ideas about who we are and where we want to go.

I will try to give more impressions of various activities in the next
few days, but last night's farewell dinner was a feast, and the
after-dinner party at the bar at the point of the Isola Tiberina was
one I will never forget --- and I had the headache to prove it.

So, it's been wonderful and you'll see massive numbers of photos soon:
a group of us has unofficially given Marcus Gladius Agricola a second
cognomen --- "Pictor", as he was never without his camera :-)

Valete optime, from Rome, this is

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36995 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Re: LEO GENN CENTENARY TODAY - Leo Genn was born 100 years ago today
---Salvete Corneli Lenti et Omnes:

I very much appreciate this tribute to the acting careers of Leo
Genn and Sir Peter Ustinov, whom to me, was such a perfect Nero.

Actually, the film Quo Vadis? is probably my favourite of films of
Ancient Rome out of the 1950's-60's. In this depiction, all the
personalities from history were very well cast by modern day
counterparts. I was rather frightened by some of the spectacles the
first time I saw it. Poppeia Sabina , the wife of Nero and former
wife of Otho was positively scary (Betty Davis eyes)....great
actress (don't know who she is/was) playing a lady with alot of
power, who doubtless frightened alot of people in her day.

And since seeing this film, I've had occasion to pick up and read a
bit of Petronius' works here and there (love this type of humour),
and I always envision Leo Genn in my mind, sitting as Gaius
Petronius at the table of Nero, obligedly, as in serving a prison
sentence, watching Nero utilize his 'tear jar'....

Petronius would be worth a fortune today with his style, I think.

Pompeia



In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
<cn_corn_lent@y...> wrote:
> SALVETE, QUIRITES!
>
> I have to write today about my best movie-hero, Leo
> Genn, because his activity was close to our common
> passion (starring in many films about ancient Rome,
> e.g. QUO VADIS); and because I can partly thank him
> that I am here in Nova Roma and the Propraetor of
> Pannonia.
>
> The 100th Anniversary of the birth of Leo Genn is
> today, on 9th August 2005. We who love Leo must
> commemorate him especially in this singular day when
> he was burn 100 years ago.
>
> If you are curious to know more this great actor,
> today I have created a new Leo Genn Centenary Website:
> I wellcome everybody visiting this website (this is
> under construction but I hope it's usefull):
>
> http://www.leogenn100.iweb.hu/
>
> I can thank Leo Genn for many things wich changed my
> life. When I saw "Quo Vadis?" Leo Genn played
> Petronius in (then I was 12) I was amazed his very
> Roman character, his elegant style. Through the act of
> Leo Genn and Sir Peter Ustinov I was enchanted by the
> world of the ancient Rome, and go on, by the classical
> literature, arts, history etc. I begun study Latin and
> Greek, then I became a university student of classical
> Greek and Roman studies. The most part of my life and
> of my activities are dedicated to the classical
> studies, the Roman culture: all that was started by
> Leo Genn's amazing performance in the "Quo Vadis". So
> I wouldn't be who I am if Leo Genn wasn't who he was.
>
> I hope Leo Genn will be more estimated one day, and
> there will be allways people Leo Genn can enchant for
> the eternal human values and the True Art.
>
> In these Latin sentences I would like to express my
> thankfullness to the great and genious actor, Leo
> Genn, who was born 100 years ago today, and I will
> pray his genius to call in more and more people for
> the classical humanity and for our Rome:
>
> CN. CORNELIUS LENTULUS PANNONICUS GRATIAS MAXIMAS AGIT
> DIVO LEONI GENNIO ACTORI, NATO HODIE ANTE 100 ANNOS,
> PRAECIPUO VIRO BRITANNICO, QUI PETRONIUS IN FILMO "QUO
> VADIS?" EUM EXCITAVIT, UT ROMAM ET POPULUM ROMANUM
> REFICI VELLE COEPISSET. EGO NON IS ESSEM, QUI SUM; SI
> TU NON IS FUISSES, QUI FUISTI. QUARE TIBI, DIVE LEO
> GENNI ACTOR, EGO AC POPULUS ROMANUS SAEPE SEMPERQUE
> GRATIAS AGERE DEBEBIMUS AGIMUSQUE. VIVAT GLORIA TUA
> SEMPER!
>
> Ante diem V. Idus Augustas MMDCCLVIII
>
> Cn Cornelius Lentulus pius
> Propraetor Pannoniae
> Accensus
> Scriba
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
> http://mail.yahoo.it
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36996 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Ancient Greek Artillary Technology from Catapults To Architronion C
Salvete omnes,

Here is an intersting site with great diagrams of ancient seige
macines... imagine even a steam catapult!


http://www.mlahanas.de/Greeks/war/CatapultTypes.htm

Regards,

QLP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36997 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Re: LEO GENN CENTENARY TODAY - Leo Genn was born 100 years ago today
Salvete Omnes.

>>--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@y...> wrote:

....Poppeia Sabina , the wife of Nero and former
> wife of Otho was positively scary (Betty Davis eyes)....great
> actress (don't know who she is/was) playing a lady with alot of
> power, who doubtless frightened alot of people in her day.<<

Patricia Laffan, born in London, 1919 and, aparently, still living.

Here are those eyes, albeit from her title role in "Devil Girl from
Mars" 3 years after "Quo Vadis?":

http://actress.shillpages.com/actress/laffap24.jpg


Valete,

Gaius Popillius Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36998 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Re: LEO GENN CENTENARY TODAY - Leo Genn was born 100 years ago today
Salvete omnes,

Yes, I remember that movie, "The Devil Girl From Mars ".
She was rather scary in that movie as well, at least in the eyes of
a seven year old. Here are some more movies she appeared in:

1984 Who Killed Van Loon? Actor: Peggy Osborn
1964 Crooks in Cloisters Actor: Lady Florence
1959 Hidden Homicide Actor: Jean
1956 23 Paces to Baker Street Actor: Miss Alice MacDonald
1954 Devil Girl from Mars Actor: Nyah
1954 Don't Blame the Stork Actor: Lilian Angel
1953 Shoot First Actor: Magda Hassingham
1953 I'll Get You Actor: Miss Brooks
1951 Quo Vadis? Actor: Poppaea
1950 Hangman's Wharf Actor: Rosa Warren

Regards,

QLP





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiuspopilliuslaenas"
<gaiuspopillius@g...> wrote:
> Salvete Omnes.
>
> >>--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
> <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@y...> wrote:
>
> ....Poppeia Sabina , the wife of Nero and former
> > wife of Otho was positively scary (Betty Davis eyes)....great
> > actress (don't know who she is/was) playing a lady with alot of
> > power, who doubtless frightened alot of people in her day.<<
>
> Patricia Laffan, born in London, 1919 and, aparently, still living.
>
> Here are those eyes, albeit from her title role in "Devil Girl
from
> Mars" 3 years after "Quo Vadis?":
>
> http://actress.shillpages.com/actress/laffap24.jpg
>
>
> Valete,
>
> Gaius Popillius Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 36999 From: Michael Kelly Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Fw: Ecology In The Roman Empire
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Kelly
To: NOVAROMACANADAOCCIDENTALIS@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 3:13 PM
Subject: Ecology In The Roman Empire


Salvete omnes,

I used to imagine that the world of the Roman Empire was heavily forested; especially in Northern Europe with expanses of great dark forests between towns and settlements just like 18th and 17th century New England.
Looks like I might be wrong and that deforestation goes way back in time further than I thought. Here is an interesting article that gives quite the picture:


http://www.motherearthnews.com/library/1980_May_June/Ecoscience__The_Greek_and_The_Romans_Did_It_Too

Regards,
QLP

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37001 From: Euphemia Cassia Mercuria Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Re: Roman Dinner Ware
Salvete omnes!

I must add my praises and recommendations of Julia (Iulia Cassia Vegetia is her Roman name, I believe). I own a number of her Samian dishes and cups, and they are lovely, easy to clean and handmade to boot! I use them for eating and drinking, and she also made me several special offering dishes and bowls for my altar, which turned out perfectly.
Her website is http://www.venetiancat.com She's also good for special reproduction requests.

Vale,
Euphemia Cassia Mercuria


"Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:
Salvete omnes,

I remember about a year ago one of our lady citizens was going to make
some replica Ancient Roman dishes and utensils that we could order. I
don't see anything in the marcellum yet so I am wondering if she is
still around or has her own site with these items.

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus




SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------




---------------------------------
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37002 From: Julia Passamonti-Colamartino Date: 2005-08-10
Subject: Re: Roman Dinner Ware-How to Order
Salvete omnes!
Magna gratias for all the wonderful compliments-it is wonderful to be
so appreciated as an artist.
I will be leaving with a fellow artisan for Pennsic War this coming
Saturday, the 13th, and will be returning on the 21st.
If you would like to place an order, just send me an e-mail with your
mane, address, ph# and item(s), and I will e-mail you a proper invoice
when I return. BTW, poculii/drinking (I hope I spelled it correctly)
are $12.00 each. I will soon be featuring some new Roman styles
(reproductions)with handles, which cost from $25.00-$30.00 each.
Pax et Lux,
Iulia Cassia Vegetia
http://venetiancat.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37003 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: Conventus update
gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:

OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

<sniped>

<and with the effort of keeping various Hispanii, Britanii, Dacii, etc. in line
(it's like trying to herd cats)>


LOL I'm trying to picture that!
Don't forget to check out the real "herds" of cats living in the Colosseum.
Have a great time, Cato!

Valete bene,

Maxima Valeria Messallina

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37005 From: FAC Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: the last dau of the conventus
Salvete Cato et Omnes,

please take my apologizes to be not there when you leaved Rome. I
tried to contact you in the morning of August 10th coming to Hotel
Michigan but nobody was in the own rooms. I waitied for someone at
dinner time in front of the hotel but I have seen nobody and I hadn't
your mobile number.

I'm quite sad to have not embrassed you all "forcing you" you all to
come back in Italy as soon as possible :-(

Valete
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Senior Consul


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes!
>
> Well. I've just come from seeing Apollonius Cordus, Fabia Livia,
and
> Gladius Agricola off to the Termini train station on their way back
> home from Rome.
>
> I've got a couple of days left before heading back to New York;
> Moravius Laureatus and I are planning to meet in the morning and go
to
> the Vatican Museums, and Constantinus Fuscus has offered to shepherd
> me around a bit as well, an offer which I plan to take him up on.
>
> It would be almost impossible (but not quite, which is why I'm
writing
> this) to describe what an incredible job Provincia Italia --- and
> specifically Serapio --- did at this Conventus. The food was
> excellent, the wine delicious, the sights unparallelled, and the
most
> important part: seeing each other face to face.
>
> At every possible moment you could wander from bunch of citizens to
> bunch of citizens and hear people talking about the res publica, the
> history of Rome, the origins of their Roman names --- and get
> embroiled in discussions that might have taken months over this
> medium, but when speaking directly to each other (sometimes
shouting,
> with much hand-waving and cries of exasperation), ended up two hours
> later pouring wine all around and laughing until tears ran down our
faces.
>
> Sulla and Perusianus presented projects that they are working on in
> Provincia Italia, and representatives of each Provincia gave a short
> speech about what is happening on their home fronts. We had a
contio;
> a meeting which followed pretty much exactly the ancient Republican
> form, at which the Consul Caesar called for the People to attend him
> and voice their minds. The Aedile Serapio conveyed this message to
> the People, and after a brief prayer asking the gods to make
> everything we spoke of be of benefit to the Republic, the
magistrates
> and senators stood before the People, and we talked to each other.
It
> was phenomenal to watch the interaction of the People, both
> magistrates and non-magistrates, as we spoke passionately about our
> ideas about who we are and where we want to go.
>
> I will try to give more impressions of various activities in the
next
> few days, but last night's farewell dinner was a feast, and the
> after-dinner party at the bar at the point of the Isola Tiberina was
> one I will never forget --- and I had the headache to prove it.
>
> So, it's been wonderful and you'll see massive numbers of photos
soon:
> a group of us has unofficially given Marcus Gladius Agricola a
second
> cognomen --- "Pictor", as he was never without his camera :-)
>
> Valete optime, from Rome, this is
>
> Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37006 From: FAC Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: Conventus update
Salve Messalina,
I thing that the cat could be the second official animal of Rome.
There are many big cats, very very romans! Beautiful, proud and
brave :-D
The colony of the Forum is very famous in the world, it live there
since many centuries. The BBC made a wonderful animal movie about it
giving to each cat the name of a famous man of the Ancient Rome.

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Senior Consul


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Maxima Valeria Messallina
<violetphearsen@y...> wrote:
> gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@y...> wrote:
>
> OSD G. Equitius Cato
>
> Salvete omnes!
>
> <sniped>
>
> <and with the effort of keeping various Hispanii, Britanii, Dacii,
etc. in line
> (it's like trying to herd cats)>
>
>
> LOL I'm trying to picture that!
> Don't forget to check out the real "herds" of cats living in the
Colosseum.
> Have a great time, Cato!
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37007 From: FAC Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
Salve Illustrus Senator Maximus,

> We will also have more Senators then citizens if this keeps up.
Since the
> Senators will be the only ones to pay taxes.

In this moment unluckly not all the Senatores pay the own taxes.
Sometime other people pay for them... And it's very very sad because I
think our Fathers should give the better example to our citizens.

> I agree with you. Leges seem to
> stripping the lifeblood away from Nova Roma.

A reform of our legislative system would be very useful, I agree.
However if we all think more to real cultural and religious projects,
the idea of a large number of laws could be less worrying ;-)

Vale
FAC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37008 From: FAC Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
Salvete Omnes,
I think that all the official documents should be posted entirely in
latin with the translation in the second official tongue of NR. In this
way everything would be more clear and we all would start to learn
Latin like a real roman nation ;-)

The Albucius' knowledge of the english tongue must to be not in
discussion, he's french and he's doing everything to talk in a
foreigner language. He admire him.
What is required are only the comments by the Senatores and unluckly
the tRibunus is in Rome now.
I'm sure the nexy time the report will be better.

Valete
FAC


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> Salve Calve;
> do you speak French? Perhaps that's the clear way of reporting.
It
> seems obvious to you but it isn't. I've been humiliated many a time
by
> a French lawyer telling me how 'obvious' it was to do something...
> As I said to eveyone here; help don't criticize or Albucius can
> post in Latin only. I'd actually love that.
> bene vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
>
> > There is no need for paragraph after paragraph of "in light of this
> > and in light of that" in order to explain what is self explanitory
> > that this is a Senate report of what the Senate voted upon, how the
> > Senators voted, and what their remarks were.
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37009 From: FAC Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: Tribunes Report
Salve Illustrus Paulinus,

> You also posted that the Senate was considering
removing "INTERPRETERS AND LICTORES"
> counted as members of the Capite Censi.
>
> It should be noted that both Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> and Lucius Sicinius Drusus taxes are paid and are both Assidui.

It should be noted too that at the begining of the Senatus COnsultum,
both the Senatores were members of the Capite Censi. During the meeting
someone payed their taxes as other magistrates inserted in the original
list did it.

As I wrote in my report to the Senatus, the removal of the interpreters
should be involved only the citizens which were members of the Capite
Censi at the official end of the voting period.

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37010 From: FAC Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Roman dinner at Conventus in Rome
Salvete Omnes,
as the end of the Dies Romanus in Rome the last Sunday, we had an
original roman dinner in the restaurant Mica Aurea of Prof. Nicastro.
He's a wonderful skilled expert of roman cooking and the dinner was
excellent. The following was the "Habemus in cena hodie":

GVSTATITCIVM (Sacred apertif)

MENSA PRIMA
- Gvstatio (appetizer): Callvm Porcinvm (bolled trot-ters with honey
and mustard)
- Fercvla prima (first course): Lentivuca de castaneis et Lagvnvm
Holeris (chestnuts like lentils and ancient lasagna)
- Fercvlvm secvndvm (second course): Haedvs parthicvs (parthian kid
with plum sauce)
- Pvlmentaria (Side dishes): Carotae Frictae et Lactvca cvm cepis
(fryed carrots in Oenogarum and vegetable purèe with lettuce and
onion)

MENSA SECVNDA
- Dvlcia (dessert): Patina de piris et tyropatinam (cake with pears
and acaraway and recruit's dessert)

POTVS (Drinks)
Mvlsvm et Vinvm et aqva (honey wine and wine and mineral water)

Valete
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Senior Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37011 From: Jack the Ripper Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Rif: [Nova-Roma] Re: the last dau of the conventus
Salvete, Consul et Omnes!
Laureatus, Meridius, Aestiva and me went to Forum Boarium with Agricola,
Cato, Livia and Cordus.
Then, we divided in two groups and thanks to tickets offered by Serapio and
Marullinus, Laureatus
and Meridius have been able to join Aestiva and me in the visit of Caracalla
s Baths.
I would like to say thank you to Conventus participants and hope to meet you
again.
If you want to send pix or just contact me, send an e-mail to alektus@libero
it


Valete Optime,

Qvintvs Fabivs Allectvs (aka Alecto)
Pater Familias Fabiae Alectae
Civis NovaRomanus Italicus, tribu Palatina - http://italia.novaroma.org
Tirone Legio I Italica - Villadose (RO) - http://www.legio-i-italica.it
Cogito, ergo fortasse sim - http://jacktheripper1984.splinder.com
Nullus amicus magis liber quam liber - http://www.liberliber.it
Auxili et libertas scriptoribus - http://www.graffiti.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Adiuvate libertate cogitandi
De gustibus non est disputandum
Vita est salus, fortitudo, vis et aliquantulum fortunae
Vincit qui se vincit
-----------------------------------------------------------------------



-------Messaggio originale-------

Da: FAC
Data: 08/11/05 18:52:42
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] Re: the last dau of the conventus

Salvete Cato et Omnes,

please take my apologizes to be not there when you leaved Rome. I
tried to contact you in the morning of August 10th coming to Hotel
Michigan but nobody was in the own rooms. I waitied for someone at
dinner time in front of the hotel but I have seen nobody and I hadn't
your mobile number.

I'm quite sad to have not embrassed you all "forcing you" you all to
come back in Italy as soon as possible :-(

Valete
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Senior Consul


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes!
>
> Well. I've just come from seeing Apollonius Cordus, Fabia Livia,
and
> Gladius Agricola off to the Termini train station on their way back
> home from Rome.
>
> I've got a couple of days left before heading back to New York;
> Moravius Laureatus and I are planning to meet in the morning and go
to
> the Vatican Museums, and Constantinus Fuscus has offered to shepherd
> me around a bit as well, an offer which I plan to take him up on.
>
> It would be almost impossible (but not quite, which is why I'm
writing
> this) to describe what an incredible job Provincia Italia --- and
> specifically Serapio --- did at this Conventus. The food was
> excellent, the wine delicious, the sights unparallelled, and the
most
> important part: seeing each other face to face.
>
> At every possible moment you could wander from bunch of citizens to
> bunch of citizens and hear people talking about the res publica, the
> history of Rome, the origins of their Roman names --- and get
> embroiled in discussions that might have taken months over this
> medium, but when speaking directly to each other (sometimes
shouting,
> with much hand-waving and cries of exasperation), ended up two hours
> later pouring wine all around and laughing until tears ran down our
faces.
>
> Sulla and Perusianus presented projects that they are working on in
> Provincia Italia, and representatives of each Provincia gave a short
> speech about what is happening on their home fronts. We had a
contio;
> a meeting which followed pretty much exactly the ancient Republican
> form, at which the Consul Caesar called for the People to attend him
> and voice their minds. The Aedile Serapio conveyed this message to
> the People, and after a brief prayer asking the gods to make
> everything we spoke of be of benefit to the Republic, the
magistrates
> and senators stood before the People, and we talked to each other.
It
> was phenomenal to watch the interaction of the People, both
> magistrates and non-magistrates, as we spoke passionately about our
> ideas about who we are and where we want to go.
>
> I will try to give more impressions of various activities in the
next
> few days, but last night's farewell dinner was a feast, and the
> after-dinner party at the bar at the point of the Isola Tiberina was
> one I will never forget --- and I had the headache to prove it.
>
> So, it's been wonderful and you'll see massive numbers of photos
soon:
> a group of us has unofficially given Marcus Gladius Agricola a
second
> cognomen --- "Pictor", as he was never without his camera :-)
>
> Valete optime, from Rome, this is
>
> Cato





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
<font face=arial size=-1><a href="http://us.ard.yahoo
com/SIG=12hu2437s/M=362335.6886444.7839734
2575449/D=groups/S=1705313712:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1123786360/A=2894362/R=0/SIG=138
78jl6/*http://www.networkforgood
org/topics/arts_culture/?source=YAHOO&cmpgn=GRP&RTP=http://groups.yahoo.com/
>What would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater?Donate or
volunteer in the arts today at Network for Good</a>.</font>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->


Yahoo! Groups Links







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37012 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: the last dau of the conventus
ave Cato omnesque,

...and back among the crowded streets of this Forum. Yes, have I
told you amice? I share your vision of this ML ;-)

> It would be almost impossible (but not quite, which is why I'm
writing
> this) to describe what an incredible job Provincia Italia --- and
> specifically Serapio --- did at this Conventus.

I'll say once for all, as Serapio could abandon his republican forma
mentis dreaming imperial laurels ;-) thanks Propraetor for the
effort you made these days. :-))

and thank you all for having being here these days and shared some
wonderful moments. After all, I'm sure, it was a great success.

A special hug to Astur, Sabinus and the people who I had the
pleasure to show the Caffarella Valley. A great kiss to the people
who climbed the Marcian+Tepula+Iulia acqueduct with me ;-) yes,
friends, that was the name and the other one with the great arches
was the aqua Claudia+Anio Novus... just for the records, eh eh
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37013 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: the last dau of the conventus
...
>A great kiss to the people
> who climbed the Marcian+Tepula+Iulia acqueduct with me ;-) yes,
> friends, that was the name and the other one with the great arches
> was the aqua Claudia+Anio Novus... just for the records, eh eh

ops! I was watching all the pics I've downloaded from the camera.
Livia, I can't see you climbing and walking on the acqueduct, where
were you? ;-) a kiss to the delightful girl as well.

vale
M IVL PERVSIANVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37014 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
A. Tullia Scholastica Kaelo quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque omnibus S.P.D.


> Ave, Caius.

Is this message intended to be private? The praetores discourage
private messages on the ML, though of course we all make mistakes.
>
> There is no doubt in my mind that Hortensia's participation in the
> sodalitas was illegal according to Nova Roman law. And to be honest, I
> find it disgusting that she uses Piscinius as a shield in defense of
> her actions so frequently. Perhaps someone should inform him to the
> fullest extend of her history if he has not been so informed already.

Maybe Piscinus is capable of independent thought. He's very
intelligent. In fact, I'm SURE he's capable of independent thought.

Marca Hortensia Maior is also a member of the Sodalitas Latinitatis.
Should she be banned from that, too? Just asking...
>
> Take it to the CP to force the Senate to act. If the Collegium will
> not act, take it to the Senators themselves. File suit with the
> appropriate authorities. Whomever or whatever it takes.

Is this your call?
>
> She cannot, in my opinion, be allowed to disregard her nefas status,
> make threats, and blatanly disobey the regard with such frequency
> without consequence. Her citizenship should have been in question many
> times over.

What in the world leads you to believe that someone's citizenship in
Nova Roma depends on whether or not he or she practices the Religio? Or
whether he or she observes orthodoxy--in a faith dependent upon, not
orthoDOXY, but orthoPRAXY? Have you read the Constitution lately?
>
> I'll be writing you again soon, amice. A lot has been happening on my
> end lately, including the death of my grandfather. Before that I was
> taking care of him, and his neighbourhood does not have wireless
> access (I checked). If you could, remember him in your prayers; it
> would be much appreciated.
>
> Vale,
> Kaelus
>
Vale, et valete.

ATS



> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, AthanasiosofSpfd@a... wrote:
>>
>> To: Marca Hortensia Maior
>> From: C. Fabius Buteo Modianus
>>
>> In your attempt to belittle Diana Octavia you mentioned this
> "Sodalitas Diis
>> Inferis." You inferred that it was a Sodalitas of Nova Roma, and
> made NO
>> indication that it was unofficial and irregular within the confines
> of Nova
>> Roma. Within Nova Roma you are FORBIDDEN to perform ANY priestly
> function. I
>> am not on the Nova Religio list, this is not a list of the Religio
> Romana of
>> Nova Roma -- as meritorious as the list may be.
>>
>> Regarding your comment, "I really must speak with some Senators about
>> returning the CP to it's historic powers during the Republic. Nova
> Roma is not a
>> theocracy." Is this supposed to be some sort of threat? If it is
> I am not
>> in the least intimidated. This is the sort of behavior I would
> expect from
>> someone classified as Nefas.
>>
>> C. Fabius Buteo Modianus
>>
>> In a message dated 8/8/2005 12:13:00 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
>> rory12001@y... writes:
>>
>> M. Hortensia Maior G. Fabio Buteo Modiano salutem dicit;
>> Salve; If you'd actually bothered to go to the webpage
>> you would see "this is an unofficial sodalitas of Nova Roma".
>>
>> Also I suggest you read the posts on the Nova Religio
>> list the kind Pontifex Maximus encouraged the lowly cives to form
>> these unofficial groups.
>>
>> I really must speak with some Senators about returning the CP to
>> it's historic powers during the Republic. Nova Roma is not a
>> theocracy.
>> vale
>> Marca Hortensia Maior
>>
>>
>>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37015 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: LEO GENN CENTENARY TODAY - Leo Genn was born 100 years ago today
---Ave G. Popillius Laenus Consul, Quintus Lanius Propraetor Omnibus:

First off, thanks for the link and info. I do not remember the
flick 'Devil Girl from Mars'. This actress has quite a roster of
accomplishment, I see, from the list provided by Quinte Lani.

There was quite a famous cast in that movie, as I recall: Robert
Taylor, Deborah Kerr, Peter Ustinov of course, and actors whose
names and histories are hardly 'household' to me...whom I'll have to
remember as 'older' guys in just about every Bible/AncientRome movie
from that era I've seen to date....they were in every one of them,
I'm sure :) But I don't remember exactly what scene in what
movie...alas...but, from my perspective, they almost could be said
of have worn the same costume from flick to flick :)

I remember reading, and I think this source was from link from one
of the Militarium Command, that Messala, the Tribune 'buddy' of Ben
Hur in the 1950's production of this novel/movie, wore black-shaded
contacts, supposedly to aid in the presentation of his character.
Quo Vadis? seemed to be more historically accurate (now I speak as
an amateur here). Patricia's eyes, in Quo Vadis?, didn't seem to
require any window dressing, as it was more than just her sclerae
that gave them their 'talking' effect.

Although it might have drifted away from the central theme of Quo
Vadis?, it would, in retrospect, have been cool to see a sequal of
this, including of course the year of the four emperors, ending
maybe with the establishment of Vespasian's rule and beginning of
the Flavian Dynasty.

Veering off topic a bit here, but.....

It wasn't actually until I came to NR and got more into reading up
on the sailing aspects of the Ancients through Sodalitas Militarium
references to good books, that I discovered how grossly inaccurate
Ben Hur was, both in the depiction of the sailing, use of slaves,
ships, and aside from that, stuff from the script and set which
subliminally implied that certain historical mindsets existed, when
really, they did not....to make a long story short.

As far as the military naval fleet commander in Ben Hur (played by
Jack Hawkins I believe), the one who ended up gracing a 12'x12' or
so raft in the middle of the sea with his future filius, Ben
Hur...its likely he deserved to lose with those silly tactics:)....
Logically and from data of scholars (Lionel Casson for one), he was
theoretically doomed. But, despite having lost his whole fleet,
including his own ship ....the battle was somehow won!.....ok...and
he went to Rome being treated to a Triumph probably better than that
of Scipio Africanus.

And aside from that, the Romans didn't have the steroids to make
horses run that fast (chariot races)....unless they perhaps did
under another name and passed the drugs in equal measure to all
competitors' horses, plus our ancient forebearers didn't wear wrist
watches (unfortunate error, in such a $$$ production, which happens)

I liked Charlton Heston's performance, but I am a bit biased....I
like his acting, period....I even put up with him in Planet of the
Apes. And the muscial score was very nice.


Po




In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiuspopilliuslaenas"
<gaiuspopillius@g...> wrote:
> Salvete Omnes.
>
> >>--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
> <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@y...> wrote:
>
> ....Poppeia Sabina , the wife of Nero and former
> > wife of Otho was positively scary (Betty Davis eyes)....great
> > actress (don't know who she is/was) playing a lady with alot of
> > power, who doubtless frightened alot of people in her day.<<
>
> Patricia Laffan, born in London, 1919 and, aparently, still living.
>
> Here are those eyes, albeit from her title role in "Devil Girl
from
> Mars" 3 years after "Quo Vadis?":
>
> http://actress.shillpages.com/actress/laffap24.jpg
>
>
> Valete,
>
> Gaius Popillius Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37016 From: Maior Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: the last dau of the conventus
M. Hortensia Maior M. Perusiano spd;
Salve: pics! oooh where, please post them!
and kissing from Italian cives: that's it I'm going to
the next Nova Roma meeting:)!
optime vale
Marca Hortensia

> ops! I was watching all the pics I've downloaded from the camera.
> Livia, I can't see you climbing and walking on the acqueduct, where
> were you? ;-) a kiss to the delightful girl as well.
>
> vale
> M IVL PERVSIANVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37017 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
In a message dated 8/11/2005 2:33:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
fororom@... writes:
Marca Hortensia Maior is also a member of the Sodalitas Latinitatis.
Should she be banned from that, too? Just asking...
Well, no. Why should she? I think the problem came about when it appeared
that this was an official club recruiting members of Nova Roma for a religious
cult.

It is not an official club, there is no Senate recognition but it has our
Pontifix Maximus blessing, least he is a member. Of course he is a member of
anything to do with the Religio. That's the way he keeps an eye on things.
Hortensia Maior (Fabia Vera's new name) can be anything she wants in private. And
that's what this club is, private.

And now that another tempest in a tea cup has been resolved, next crisis
please.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37018 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: "Rome" Mini Series
Salve,

HBO is going to show the Making of "Rome" tonight at 9:30pm CDT. It
will have interviews with the cast and crew.

Vale,

Quintus Servilius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37019 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-11
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
C. Fabius Buteo Modianus Aulae Tulliae Scholasticae salutem dicit

The post by L. Modius Kaelus was indeed intended to be private, as he
indicated to me in a private post. Modius Kaelus is young, and not fully aware of
everything that has transpired with regard to Hortensia Maior and the
decretum that removed her as a sacerdos -- nor should he.

Additionally, at the last official voting of the Collegium Pontificum there
was a vote to have the "nefas" status of M. Hortensia Maior removed. I was
one of the pontifices within the Collegium Pontificum who voted to have this
status removed. I do not believe that Kaelus is aware of this -- as the
voting results of the Collegium Pontificum are not published like that of the
senate (this could change, and is up to the Pontifex Maximus).

Regarding the ongoing debate of Orthopraxy vs. Orthodoxy... I must add that
aspects of Catholic and Orthodox Christianity have their orthopraxic side,
yet they are faiths that are not limited to orthopraxy. To state that the
Religio Romana is ONLY orthopraxic is to limit the Religio Romana in such a way
that I believe was not a practice exclusively practiced by the ancient people
we endeavor to emulate. The constitution of Nova Roma does not specifically
use the term orthopraxy. As a modern "Pagan" man who believes in the Gods
of Rome, I can with all honesty state that my faith is not simply a cold
orthopraxic faith. It is both orthopraxic, and spiritual to me. I believe that I
am not the only one who feels this way.

Regarding the remarks of L. Modius Kaelus, his comment was inappropriate for
the main list. He should apologize to M. Hortensia Maior for his post.

Vale;

C. Fabius Buteo Modianus

In a message dated 8/11/2005 5:33:49 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
fororom@... writes:

A. Tullia Scholastica Kaelo quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque omnibus S.P.D.


> Ave, Caius.

Is this message intended to be private? The praetores discourage
private messages on the ML, though of course we all make mistakes.
>
> There is no doubt in my mind that Hortensia's participation in the
> sodalitas was illegal according to Nova Roman law. And to be honest, I
> find it disgusting that she uses Piscinius as a shield in defense of
> her actions so frequently. Perhaps someone should inform him to the
> fullest extend of her history if he has not been so informed already.

Maybe Piscinus is capable of independent thought. He's very
intelligent. In fact, I'm SURE he's capable of independent thought.

Marca Hortensia Maior is also a member of the Sodalitas Latinitatis.
Should she be banned from that, too? Just asking...
>
> Take it to the CP to force the Senate to act. If the Collegium will
> not act, take it to the Senators themselves. File suit with the
> appropriate authorities. Whomever or whatever it takes.

Is this your call?
>
> She cannot, in my opinion, be allowed to disregard her nefas status,
> make threats, and blatanly disobey the regard with such frequency
> without consequence. Her citizenship should have been in question many
> times over.

What in the world leads you to believe that someone's citizenship in
Nova Roma depends on whether or not he or she practices the Religio? Or
whether he or she observes orthodoxy--in a faith dependent upon, not
orthoDOXY, but orthoPRAXY? Have you read the Constitution lately?
>
> I'll be writing you again soon, amice. A lot has been happening on my
> end lately, including the death of my grandfather. Before that I was
> taking care of him, and his neighbourhood does not have wireless
> access (I checked). If you could, remember him in your prayers; it
> would be much appreciated.
>
> Vale,
> Kaelus
>
Vale, et valete.

ATS






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37020 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
A. Tullia Scholastica C. Fabio Buteoni Modiano quiritibus, sociis,
peregrinisque omnibus S.P.D.
>
> C. Fabius Buteo Modianus Aulae Tulliae Scholasticae salutem dicit
>
> The post by L. Modius Kaelus was indeed intended to be private, as he
> indicated to me in a private post. Modius Kaelus is young, and not fully
> aware of
> everything that has transpired with regard to Hortensia Maior and the
> decretum that removed her as a sacerdos -- nor should he.

It is, however, good to get the facts before spouting off.
>
> Additionally, at the last official voting of the Collegium Pontificum there
> was a vote to have the "nefas" status of M. Hortensia Maior removed. I was
> one of the pontifices within the Collegium Pontificum who voted to have this
> status removed. I do not believe that Kaelus is aware of this -- as the
> voting results of the Collegium Pontificum are not published like that of the
> senate (this could change, and is up to the Pontifex Maximus).

Indeed. And we know that he has been preoccupied with a serious family
matter.

Since these votes affect us all, however, it would be very helpful if
they were published.
>
> Regarding the ongoing debate of Orthopraxy vs. Orthodoxy... I must add that
> aspects of Catholic and Orthodox Christianity have their orthopraxic side,

Indeed they do. Most faiths have rituals which must be performed in
certain specified ways, and some, like Catholicism, Orthodoxy, and some
Protestant denominations, have more of this element than do some others.

> yet they are faiths that are not limited to orthopraxy. To state that the
> Religio Romana is ONLY orthopraxic is to limit the Religio Romana in such a
> way
> that I believe was not a practice exclusively practiced by the ancient people
> we endeavor to emulate.

Very probably it wasn't.

>The constitution of Nova Roma does not specifically
> use the term orthopraxy. As a modern "Pagan" man who believes in the Gods
> of Rome, I can with all honesty state that my faith is not simply a cold
> orthopraxic faith. It is both orthopraxic, and spiritual to me. I believe
> that I
> am not the only one who feels this way.

No, of course you aren't. Just as people learn in different ways, they
practice religion, or philosophy, in different ways. Some take a more
analytical approach, which others find cold, whereas others become deeply
involved emotionally. Moreover, some express the emotional side of faith
quietly, in their hearts, and some with exuberance.
>
> Regarding the remarks of L. Modius Kaelus, his comment was inappropriate for
> the main list. He should apologize to M. Hortensia Maior for his post.
>
I cannot but agree with this, and am pleased that you have said this.
The matter of citizenship is even more offensive than the other--what if our
new citizens actually believed that they were in danger of being booted for
practicing religions other than the RR, or for taking a different view of
it? A citizen asked me today about these very issues, and those relating to
this sodalitas.

> Vale;
>
> C. Fabius Buteo Modianus

Vale,

A. Tullia Scholastica

>
> In a message dated 8/11/2005 5:33:49 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> fororom@... writes:
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica Kaelo quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque omnibus S.P.D.
>
>
>> Ave, Caius.
>
> Is this message intended to be private? The praetores discourage
> private messages on the ML, though of course we all make mistakes.
>>
>> There is no doubt in my mind that Hortensia's participation in the
>> sodalitas was illegal according to Nova Roman law. And to be honest, I
>> find it disgusting that she uses Piscinius as a shield in defense of
>> her actions so frequently. Perhaps someone should inform him to the
>> fullest extend of her history if he has not been so informed already.
>
> Maybe Piscinus is capable of independent thought. He's very
> intelligent. In fact, I'm SURE he's capable of independent thought.
>
> Marca Hortensia Maior is also a member of the Sodalitas Latinitatis.
> Should she be banned from that, too? Just asking...
>>
>> Take it to the CP to force the Senate to act. If the Collegium will
>> not act, take it to the Senators themselves. File suit with the
>> appropriate authorities. Whomever or whatever it takes.
>
> Is this your call?
>>
>> She cannot, in my opinion, be allowed to disregard her nefas status,
>> make threats, and blatanly disobey the regard with such frequency
>> without consequence. Her citizenship should have been in question many
>> times over.
>
> What in the world leads you to believe that someone's citizenship in
> Nova Roma depends on whether or not he or she practices the Religio? Or
> whether he or she observes orthodoxy--in a faith dependent upon, not
> orthoDOXY, but orthoPRAXY? Have you read the Constitution lately?
>>
>> I'll be writing you again soon, amice. A lot has been happening on my
>> end lately, including the death of my grandfather. Before that I was
>> taking care of him, and his neighbourhood does not have wireless
>> access (I checked). If you could, remember him in your prayers; it
>> would be much appreciated.
>>
>> Vale,
>> Kaelus
>>
> Vale, et valete.
>
> ATS
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37021 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "FAC" <sacro_barese_impero@l...>
wrote:
>
> A reform of our legislative system would be very useful, I agree.
> However if we all think more to real cultural and religious
projects,
> the idea of a large number of laws could be less worrying ;-)
>
> Vale
> FAC

Salve,

The large number of laws, edicta, ect. would be less worrying if
they weren't used to crush individual initiative to come up with
more real cultural and religious projects. How many times have we
all seen someone come up with an idea here only to have the "rules
lawyers" start quoting various leges and edicts to immediately crush
the life out of any idea?

In the very few instances that someone actually manages to negotiate
all the hurdles and jump through the flaming hoops required to get
anything done in Nova Roma rest assured that there will soon be a
new lex rammed through one Comitia or the other to make sure that
doesn't happen again any time soon.

Let's look at what a person attempting to just join Nova Roma must
go through. First they must pick a pre-approved name from a very
restricted list of Praenoma. That list was much larger when I drew
it up based on historical resources but was cut way down on the
premise that many of the historically accurate names were not that
common and people would pick the uncommon names at too great a
frequency. When it comes to picking a cognomen the applicant has
greater freedom of choice, but if they pick a cognomen which isn't
on the pre-approved list they must then either take the easier path
of picking a different one off the pre-approved list or prepare a
doctrinal thesis to defend their choice. Had I encountered this
when I first joined Nova Roma back in 2001 I would have said, "Never
mind, I can see that this is one of those type of organizations that
micro-manages its members."

The facts speak for themselves. The number of people willing to
financial support the organization decreases every year. The trend
in the current census is showing that there will likely as not be
less citizens at the end of this census then at the end of the
previous census. The only two areas to show any growth in the past
two years is the number of laws and the number of Socii.

Vale,

Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37022 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: the last dau of the conventus
ave Hortensia Maior

> Salve: pics! oooh where, please post them!

I bet shortly you will see a website about the Conventus pictures, to
avoid filling the ML webspace ;-)


> and kissing from Italian cives:
...that's the Italian way to greet. Not hugs, quite a couple of kisses
on the cheeks ;-)

vale
M IVL PERVSIANVS


> > ops! I was watching all the pics I've downloaded from the camera.
> > Livia, I can't see you climbing and walking on the acqueduct, where
> > were you? ;-) a kiss to the delightful girl as well.
> >
> > vale
> > M IVL PERVSIANVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37023 From: Aestiva Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Ant: Rif: [Nova-Roma] Re: the last dau of the conventus
Salvete Allectus et Omnes,

It was a realy great and wonderful week, and many thanks to Serapio and Perusianus, hope to see you all again! ;-)

vale bene
Aestiva

Jack the Ripper <peaceboy@...> schrieb:
Salvete, Consul et Omnes!
Laureatus, Meridius, Aestiva and me went to Forum Boarium with Agricola,
Cato, Livia and Cordus.
Then, we divided in two groups and thanks to tickets offered by Serapio and
Marullinus, Laureatus
and Meridius have been able to join Aestiva and me in the visit of Caracalla
s Baths.
I would like to say thank you to Conventus participants and hope to meet you
again.
If you want to send pix or just contact me, send an e-mail to alektus@libero
it


Valete Optime,

Qvintvs Fabivs Allectvs (aka Alecto)
Pater Familias Fabiae Alectae
Civis NovaRomanus Italicus, tribu Palatina - http://italia.novaroma.org
Tirone Legio I Italica - Villadose (RO) - http://www.legio-i-italica.it
Cogito, ergo fortasse sim - http://jacktheripper1984.splinder.com
Nullus amicus magis liber quam liber - http://www.liberliber.it
Auxili et libertas scriptoribus - http://www.graffiti.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Adiuvate libertate cogitandi
De gustibus non est disputandum
Vita est salus, fortitudo, vis et aliquantulum fortunae
Vincit qui se vincit
-----------------------------------------------------------------------



-------Messaggio originale-------

Da: FAC
Data: 08/11/05 18:52:42
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] Re: the last dau of the conventus

Salvete Cato et Omnes,

please take my apologizes to be not there when you leaved Rome. I
tried to contact you in the morning of August 10th coming to Hotel
Michigan but nobody was in the own rooms. I waitied for someone at
dinner time in front of the hotel but I have seen nobody and I hadn't
your mobile number.

I'm quite sad to have not embrassed you all "forcing you" you all to
come back in Italy as soon as possible :-(

Valete
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Senior Consul


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes!
>
> Well. I've just come from seeing Apollonius Cordus, Fabia Livia,
and
> Gladius Agricola off to the Termini train station on their way back
> home from Rome.
>
> I've got a couple of days left before heading back to New York;
> Moravius Laureatus and I are planning to meet in the morning and go
to
> the Vatican Museums, and Constantinus Fuscus has offered to shepherd
> me around a bit as well, an offer which I plan to take him up on.
>
> It would be almost impossible (but not quite, which is why I'm
writing
> this) to describe what an incredible job Provincia Italia --- and
> specifically Serapio --- did at this Conventus. The food was
> excellent, the wine delicious, the sights unparallelled, and the
most
> important part: seeing each other face to face.
>
> At every possible moment you could wander from bunch of citizens to
> bunch of citizens and hear people talking about the res publica, the
> history of Rome, the origins of their Roman names --- and get
> embroiled in discussions that might have taken months over this
> medium, but when speaking directly to each other (sometimes
shouting,
> with much hand-waving and cries of exasperation), ended up two hours
> later pouring wine all around and laughing until tears ran down our
faces.
>
> Sulla and Perusianus presented projects that they are working on in
> Provincia Italia, and representatives of each Provincia gave a short
> speech about what is happening on their home fronts. We had a
contio;
> a meeting which followed pretty much exactly the ancient Republican
> form, at which the Consul Caesar called for the People to attend him
> and voice their minds. The Aedile Serapio conveyed this message to
> the People, and after a brief prayer asking the gods to make
> everything we spoke of be of benefit to the Republic, the
magistrates
> and senators stood before the People, and we talked to each other.
It
> was phenomenal to watch the interaction of the People, both
> magistrates and non-magistrates, as we spoke passionately about our
> ideas about who we are and where we want to go.
>
> I will try to give more impressions of various activities in the
next
> few days, but last night's farewell dinner was a feast, and the
> after-dinner party at the bar at the point of the Isola Tiberina was
> one I will never forget --- and I had the headache to prove it.
>
> So, it's been wonderful and you'll see massive numbers of photos
soon:
> a group of us has unofficially given Marcus Gladius Agricola a
second
> cognomen --- "Pictor", as he was never without his camera :-)
>
> Valete optime, from Rome, this is
>
> Cato







Yahoo! Groups Links







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------




---------------------------------
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB kostenlosem Speicher

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37024 From: laelia_laeta Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Oath of office
I, Gaia Laelia Laeta do hereby solemnly swear to uphold the honor of
Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests of the people and
the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Gaia Laelia Laeta swear to honor the
Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to pursue the
Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Gaia Laelia Laeta swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as
the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that
would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I,Gaia Laelia Laeta swear to protect and defend the Constitution of
Nova Roma.

I, Gaia Laelia Laeta further swear to fulfill the obligations and
responsibilities of the office of scriba to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods
and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I
accept the position of scriba and all the rights, privileges,
obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.





Ego, Gaia Laelia Laeta , hac re ipsa decus Novae Romae me defensuram,
et semper pro populo senatuque Novae Romae acturam esse sollemniter IVRO.

Ego, Gaia Laelia Laeta , officio scribae Novae Romae accepto, deos
deasque Romae in omnibus meae vitae publicae temporibus culturum, et
virtutes Romanas publica privataque vita me persecuturam esse IVRO.

Ego, Gaia Laelia Laeta , Religioni Romanae me fauturam et eam
defensuram, et numquam contra eius statum publicum me acturam esse, ne
quid detrimenti capiat IVRO.

Ego, Gaia Laelia Laeta officiis muneris scribae me quam optime
functuram esse praeterea IVRO.

Meo civis Novae Romae honore, coram deis deabusque populi Romani, et
voluntate favoreque eorum, ego munus scribae una cum iuribus,
privilegiis, muneribus et officiis comitantibus ACCIPIO.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37025 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Gallia - EP XXXVI - About the official website
Edictum Propraetoricium XXXVI

Ex Officio Propraetoris Galliae

This edictum deletes and replaces the EP XVIII.

1. Regarding the address of the web site
The web site is located at the address: http://www.fr-novarona.com/ and concerns whatever
it contains.

2. Regarding responsibilities for the web site:
The persons responsible for the Provincial web site are the Curatores Araneae and the
Propraetor. The Curatores Aranae will be named by Edictum Propraetoricium in the future.
Only the Propraetor may veto the actions of the Curatores Araneae for the general
management of the website. Any insertion of information into the website might be to be
rejected by the Propraetor or by the Curatores Araneae Galliae.
There is three Curatores Aranae:
- Curator Aranae Belgicae Germanicae for the site in Dutch.
- Curator Aranae Franciae for the site in French.
- Curator Aranae Angliae for the site in English.
Technically, the Propraetor grants access to the administration of the website to the
Curatores Aranae.

3. Regarding the structure of the website:
• The website must contain at least one explicit link to the main website of Nova Roma.
• It may not contain any explicit or implicit ideas contrary to the basic ideals of Nova
Roma, as stated in the main website of Nova Roma.
• It may not contain anything that would be considered illegal in any nations making up
the Provincia.
• The main page must contain the Provincial Logo linked to the main website of Nova Roma.


4. Regarding registration to the website
• All the citizens of Gallia are asked to register to the website.
• Any citizen of Nova Roma can register to the website.
• Any non citizen person can register to the website upon acceptation of the Propraetor.
• Registration is required in order to post and participate to the website.

5. Regarding the translation of the website
The website is divided in three main parts corresponding to the three main languages of
Gallia: English, Dutch and French. The switch between the three parts is being done in
the module at the lower left part of the site.
A part in Latin will have to be implemented in the future.

6. Regarding the contents of the website
The Curatores Aranae are free to post on their respective part of the website. The
contents will have to be dedicated to Roman matters or any other related subject.
Some modules (blocks) are compulsory on any part of the website: RomanNews, RomanEcards,
Gallia Governement. This list can be implemented in the future by Edictum
Propraetoricium.

This edictum becomes effective immediately.

Given in Lutetia the 12th of August 2005 of the current Era, in the year of the
consulship of Franciscus Apulus Caesar and Gaius Popillius Laenas



Sextus Apollonius Scipio

Propraetor Galliae

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37026 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
What Calvus said is ALL too true, unfortunately. VALE
ET VALETE.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <richmal@...>
wrote:
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "FAC"
<sacro_barese_impero@l...>
> wrote:
> >
> > A reform of our legislative system would be very
useful, I agree.
> > However if we all think more to real cultural and
religious
> projects,
> > the idea of a large number of laws could be less
worrying ;-)
> >
> > Vale
> > FAC
>
> Salve,
>
> The large number of laws, edicta, ect. would be less
worrying if
> they weren't used to crush individual initiative to
come up with
> more real cultural and religious projects. How many
times have we
> all seen someone come up with an idea here only to
have the "rules
> lawyers" start quoting various leges and edicts to
immediately crush
> the life out of any idea?
>
> In the very few instances that someone actually
manages to negotiate
> all the hurdles and jump through the flaming hoops
required to get
> anything done in Nova Roma rest assured that there
will soon be a
> new lex rammed through one Comitia or the other to
make sure that
> doesn't happen again any time soon.
>
> Let's look at what a person attempting to just join
Nova Roma must
> go through. First they must pick a pre-approved
name from a very
> restricted list of Praenoma. That list was much
larger when I drew
> it up based on historical resources but was cut way
down on the
> premise that many of the historically accurate names
were not that
> common and people would pick the uncommon names at
too great a
> frequency. When it comes to picking a cognomen the
applicant has
> greater freedom of choice, but if they pick a
cognomen which isn't
> on the pre-approved list they must then either take
the easier path
> of picking a different one off the pre-approved list
or prepare a
> doctrinal thesis to defend their choice. Had I
encountered this
> when I first joined Nova Roma back in 2001 I would
have said, "Never
> mind, I can see that this is one of those type of
organizations that
> micro-manages its members."
>
> The facts speak for themselves. The number of
people willing to
> financial support the organization decreases every
year. The trend
> in the current census is showing that there will
likely as not be
> less citizens at the end of this census then at the
end of the
> previous census. The only two areas to show any
growth in the past
> two years is the number of laws and the number of
Socii.
>
> Vale,
>
> Calvus
>
>
>
>
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37027 From: Dan Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
As Buteo Modianus has previously indicated, this was indeed intended
to be a private post, and a very reactionary one, at that. Had I
intended it to be a public post, I would have read all of the
appropriate corresponding posts carefully and then posted a reply
without invective for the purposes of discourse and discussion.

I regret having posted this convoluted message, not only by accident
to the ML, but in private as well. I have been occupied with
responsibilities and difficulties in my 'macronational' life, and have
expended what effort I could online towards other projects regarding
the Religio Romana. Only occasionally have I read the Main List, in
addition to voting and confirming my status in the ongoing census. I
was not aware of all of the information regarding this issue, nor was
I privy to the full scope of what has transpired in my absense. I was
not aware that Hortensia's status or the actual extent of her
participation in religio-based organisations. My anger therefore was
misplaced, and my reaction even more unnecessary.

So I therefore extend a sincere apology to Hortensia Maior.


Vale et valete,
Kaelus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37028 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
<richmal@...> wrote:

> In the very few instances that someone actually manages to negotiate
> all the hurdles and jump through the flaming hoops required to get
> anything done in Nova Roma rest assured that there will soon be a
> new lex rammed through one Comitia or the other to make sure that
> doesn't happen again any time soon.

The overabundance of laws and lawyers here has strangled this
organization.

The annual changes to the election rules waste the time of everyone
involved, and caused a controversy that resulted in the loss of
active citizens when a candidate narrowly lost shortly after the
rules were changed.

A priest has become inactive because of a "lawsuit" for "slander".

The plethora of new laws are increasingly badly written, illogical,
and unnecessary.

> The facts speak for themselves. The number of people willing to
> financial support the organization decreases every year. The trend
> in the current census is showing that there will likely as not be
> less citizens at the end of this census then at the end of the
> previous census. The only two areas to show any growth in the past
> two years is the number of laws and the number of Socii.

Newcomers see a flurry of confusing edicts and arguments about
minutia, then get discouraged and leave.

Old-timers are bitter about having put so much energy into a
giant "hamster wheel" that goes nowhere.

Nova Roma needs a reboot, badly. Sweep away *all* the laws and
accumulated cruft, and create a climate that discourages more from
accumulating.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37029 From: Maior Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
M. Hortensia Maior G. Buteo Modiano Modio Kaelo spd;
Salvete; first I would like to sincerely thank Pontifex
Gaius Buteo Modianus for his support in the past and now. I also wish
to thank Modius Kaelus for his apology.

It is a great thing if all supporters of the Religio work together. I
certainly vow to do my best and support the Collegium Pontificium and
all Nova Roma's pontiffs, priests and augurs.
bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior

> So I therefore extend a sincere apology to Hortensia Maior.
>
>
> Vale et valete,
> Kaelus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37030 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: Conventus update
G. Equitius Cato Fr. Apulo Caesari M. Valeriae Messalinae
quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes!

Yes, the cats were everywhere and quite well-behaved :-)

In the piazza next to my apartment, there was a large section of Roman
ruins, including the temple of Fortuna Huisce Diei; alongside the
ruins is an actual cat sanctuary, where the cats have been given a
safe haven and live quite well. The Consul explained at one point
that there is a very strong idea in Rome that all living things have
the right to live where they are born --- so the cats are now a living
example of this idea.

Consul, no need to apologize: after spending the day walking around
the Form Boarum and wandering near the Forum Romanum, those of us left
in the City were exhausted; we wewre probably all taking a nap by
dinner time. At least I was :-)

Yesterday morning Laureatus, Meridius and I spent going through the
Vatican. We climbed up to the cupola --- about 1/2 way up (there's an
elevator to the third story (the balcony which circles the Dome above
the baldachino over St. Peter's Tomb, but then there are 320 more
stairs to climb, often winding in a tight circle or pressed between he
outer dome and the inner one) I told myself that I need to quit
smoking :-)

In the Vatican bookstore, I looked for playing cards with all the
popes on them (I have a friend who collects them --- playing cards,
not popes --- but alas, was unable to find any. How about Nova Roma
creates playing cards with the great philosophers, writers, and
statesmen of the Republican age?

Fuscus and I met for drinks at the Piazza de Copelle, and spent a good
couple of hours discussing political processes at great length; we
still disagree about certain things, but wine is a great social
lubricator, and so we left in good spirits and much better regard for
each other.

Some other flashbacks about the Conventus:

Serapio at first looked very serious, standing with a large folder
containing the bits and pieces of vital information necessary to keep
us walking in the general direction we were supposed to be.
Eventually, he was not only able to look serious while standing, but
also very serious while walking and talking on his cellphone.

For those of us who had the good fortune to drive with the Consul in
his car, we were entertained by his ability to talk to us, drive while
waving his hands in true Italian fashion, and point out various sights
and monuments; he did this while touching the steering wheel only
occasionally.

Perusianus was able to keep calm and collected while being asked
several questions at once, in English, while herding us along through
typical Roman traffic.

Salvius Astur kept a running translation going, in English, Spanish,
and Italian. He would bounce from group to group and repeat
everything, often adding his own comentary. Note to Astur: Columbus
was ITALIAN :-)

More to come!

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37031 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION (The Bright Side)
---Salvete Marcus Octavius Senator, Consularis, Censor Emeritus
Omnibus:

Good to read from you, Marce Octavi.

While your account of our current state of affairs has much merit, I
believe that the events/factors responsible for existing
predicaments in Nova Roma.... and these factors are perceived
variously from citizen to citizen.... we have to keep in mind that
we have had a 6 year (from the dictatorship of Vedius) accumulation
of laws, not all of which were intended to be of an insidiously
stealth nature. For example, I think some of your legislation was
very good, and well intentioned. No Consul or Tribune has a crystal
ball to predict the final outcome of dotting an 'i'.

While agreeing with you in some of your assertions, certainly, I
think one has to be careful, in fairness, to acknowledge, or atleast
I want to, that I cannot reasonably cast blame on certain states of
affairs as being the product of this year's administration, to wit,
the Consuls or Tribunes.

The Consuls nor Tribunes this year, can hardly be cited as
being 'law happy'...the promulgations, and those in discussion seem
to have materialized out of necessity and out of the request of the
people, due to some obvious gaps in legal language...talking here
about resignations, provocatio, and one contio at present about how
to historically/legally keep the Senate numbers reasonable. The
latter I've read no negative feedback about to date, that I've seen.

I am not thrilled to bits with the recent report of the Tribune, but
I said my piece and that is that. And yes, I did quote a lex to
back up what I said, as I usually do in legal discussion. Magister
Calvus' remarks, if I read him correctly, are such that the report
in question is difficult to format, for reasons he explains better
than I. I believe D. Constantinus Fuscus Tribunus, in his last
address suggested that we leave this feedback for Tribune Albucius
to reflect on; he has been in Rome, enjoying the cultural aspect of
NR.

Does this feedback of mine irrevocably imply that I do not think
Albucius Tribunus is a good tribune? No. It does not mean any such
thing...'good' and 'bad' are relative terms, and all we have to
measure certain things is our laws, for better or worse, and in many
respects I think he is a good Tribune, and I have agreed with a
bounty of his thoughts and presentations. But I think we are both
pragmatic enough to realize that we are not going to agree on
everything all of the time.

I think the most legal burraaraaah this year has been caused by one
single magistrate, and the activity related to this on the part of
the Consuls, Tribunes, etc. has been in response to this, although
their opinions are not always homogenous; after all, they are human,
no? They were rather forced, unfortunately, by duty, to spend alot
of time addressing an event, pretty much the same claim, presented
through different legal avenues, on three different occasions.

The ML list has been this year, continent of some good cultural
discussion, and when it is not, it is often because the Sodalitates
are entertaining more traffic than the past, and although if one
looks at the ML, it is easy to assume that nothing is going on in
NR, when it fact it is buzzing on individual lists related to
particular interest.

There are lots of avenue for face-to-face meetings and participaton
of NR in established events has increased, if one cares to be a part
of them.



I think the Praetores and list moderators of this year are doing a
good job as we see a marked decrease in abusive dialogue. It is
not 'gone' but it has been decreased in good measure. One could see
it start to decrease last year thanks to the list moderation of G.
Equitius Marinus Consular, now Censor, which is to his credit also,
given the tremendous workload he carried, and the abuses directed at
his magisterial person, such assaults construed as permissable by
those standing firmly on the flimsiest perception of authority to do
so.

I too, wish certain things never happened in NR, but the fruits of
what we see are maturity of seeds sown through the years, for better
for worse, for innocence or illmotivation; we are not seeing
anything soley attributable to this year's administration.

Valete,
Po








In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Matt Hucke <hucke@c...> wrote:
>
> <richmal@c...> wrote:
>
> > In the very few instances that someone actually manages to
negotiate
> > all the hurdles and jump through the flaming hoops required to
get
> > anything done in Nova Roma rest assured that there will soon be
a
> > new lex rammed through one Comitia or the other to make sure that
> > doesn't happen again any time soon.
>
> The overabundance of laws and lawyers here has strangled this
> organization.
>
> The annual changes to the election rules waste the time of everyone
> involved, and caused a controversy that resulted in the loss of
> active citizens when a candidate narrowly lost shortly after the
> rules were changed.
>
> A priest has become inactive because of a "lawsuit" for "slander".
>
> The plethora of new laws are increasingly badly written, illogical,
> and unnecessary.
>
> > The facts speak for themselves. The number of people willing to
> > financial support the organization decreases every year. The
trend
> > in the current census is showing that there will likely as not be
> > less citizens at the end of this census then at the end of the
> > previous census. The only two areas to show any growth in the
past
> > two years is the number of laws and the number of Socii.
>
> Newcomers see a flurry of confusing edicts and arguments about
> minutia, then get discouraged and leave.
>
> Old-timers are bitter about having put so much energy into a
> giant "hamster wheel" that goes nowhere.
>
> Nova Roma needs a reboot, badly. Sweep away *all* the laws and
> accumulated cruft, and create a climate that discourages more from
> accumulating.
>
> --
> hucke@c...
> http://www.graveyards.com
>
> "The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
> voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37032 From: Sempronia Graccha Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Iuro
Salvete Omnes!
I, Alison Tomkins (Salvia Sempronia Graccha Volentia), do hereby solemnly
swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best
interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.
As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Alison Tomkins (Salvia Sempronia Graccha
Volentia), swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public
dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.
I swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of
Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status
as the State Religion.
I, Alison Tomkins (Salvia Sempronia Graccha Volentia), swear to protect
and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma. I further swear to fulfill the
obligations and responsibilities of the office of propraetrix of Provincia
America Medioccidentalis Superior to the best of my abilities.
On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods
and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept
the position of propraetrix and all the rights, privileges, obligations,
and responsibilities attendant thereto.
Ego, Salvia Sempronia Graccha Volentia, hac re ipsa decus Novae Romae me
defensuram, et semper pro populo senatuque Novae Romae acturam esse
sollemniter IVRO.
Ego, Salvia Sempronia Graccha Volentia, officio propraetricis Provinciae
America Medioccidentalis Superior Novae Romae accepto, deos deasque Romae
in omnibus meae vitae publicae temporibus culturum, et virtutes Romanas
publica privataque vita me persecuturam esse IVRO. Ego, Salvia Sempronia
Graccha Volentia, Religioni Romanae me fauturam et eam defensuram, et
numquam contra eius statum publicum me acturam esse, ne quid detrimenti
capiat IVRO.
Ego,Salvia Sempronia Graccha Volentia, officiis muneris propraetricis AMS
me quam optime functuram esse praeterea IVRO.
Meo civis Novae Romae honore, coram deis deabusque populi Romani, et
voluntate favoreque eorum, ego munus propraetricis AMS una cum iuribus,
privilegiis, muneribus et officiis comitantibus ACCIPIO.

Valete, et habitetis in luce deorum!
Salvia Sempronia Graccha Volentia





____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37033 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Farewell from Outgoing Propraetor Of America Medioccidentalis Super
Salvete Omnes,

Since the new Propraetor has taken the Oath of Office, I now
officially step down as Propraetor of America
Medioccidentalis Superior Province. I congratulate Salvia Sempronia
Graccha on being named as my successor.

While I am leaving as Propraetor I am not leaving Nova Roma. I will
still be the head of Gens Servilia
and remain a Lictor Curiatas. I also will offer any needed assistance
to the new Propraetor in the coming
days.

Valete,

Quintus Servilius Priscus
Lictor Curiatas
Founder of Gens Servilia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37034 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
G. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano L. Kaelo A. Tulliae
Scholasticae quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

I have finally had a chance to follow this discussion, and would like
to add a comment or two (no great surprise).

Gaius Buteo, you are absolutely correct in saying that the religio can
be much much more than simple orthopraxy --- and indeed that Orthodoxy
(I will refrain from comment on Roman Catholicism as I am not a
practitioner of that cultus) is not only orthodoxic but in many ways
orthopractic as well.

The key is, I think, that while Orthodoxy does have orthopractic
elements, the religio romana does NOT have orthodoxic requirements in
any case or under any circumstances. That you, as a self-styled
"Pagan man", happen to have an orthodoxic element to your private
religious practice is a laudable thing; to assume that anyone else
"should" have anything similiar in regards to the religio (or, in
fact, ANY private cultus) is, however, unsupportable by historic
practice.

Quintus Maximus has pointed out, and I actually agree with him (yes, I
know, a certain sign for we Christians that the End Times are
immminent) that Marca Hortensia has created a private List and it is
private; i.e., the equivalent of the "Nova Roman Christians" List that
I created and have since given over to others to moderate. I'm sure
the College of Pontiffs would have issued some kind of statement
regarding the existence of a List specifically aimed at helping
Christians within Nova Roma talk about our cultus privatus if they
felt there was some kind of subversive element to it; in fact, Gaius
Buteo belongs to that List as well.

That there is a tempest surrounding Marca Hortensia's formation of the
exact same kind of List, a private List dedicated to a private cultus,
seems to me to be based on a matter of personalities, and this is
exactly the kind of argument which solidifies both pre-existent biases
and does little to strengthen the growth of the religio.

At the Conventus, I was privileged to be involved in many discussions
about the role of the religio in our res publica, and how to create an
atmosphere of collegiality and education for our citizens regarding
the State religion both in public and private. The overwhelming,
common conclusion was for the College of Pontiffs to open the doors of
their temples and tell the People what they are doing, in private, to
advance the religio for the benefit of the res publica; to make those
private things public.

As the producer of the Calendar (admittedly at times sporadic, but I'm
doing my best), I try to educate the People about the historic
foundations of the religio; having seen now those places where the
things I have written in the Calendar actually took place is an
indescribably affecting thing. But as a non-practitioner, I can only
report facts and events --- ONLY the pontiffs can make affect evolve
into effect. When Cincinnatus Augur describes his private rites on a
religious occasion, he is showing the People that their bridges to the
gods are being tended; when any flamen or pontiff or augur --- or even
(just as importantly) any private citizen describes his or her actions
on a specific day in accordance with ancient practice, the People can
hear their State religio being upheld.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37035 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
G. Equitius Cato Fr. Apulo Caesari Q. Cassio Calvo S.P.D.

Salvete viri.

I have spoken with the Consul Caesar about this very idea, and he
himself spoke very passionately about it at the Conventus during the
contio, and I agree, to a great extent.

Calvus, the only area in which I might disagree slightly is that there
is more to the res publica than numbers. Since I have been acting as
a moderator of this Forum under the imperium of my praetor Arminus
Fausts, I have seen the numbers of people on it grow from 600+ to over
1000. Whether or not they are citizens, there are more people reading
and interacting with us than ever before. To continue my
stubbornly-held belief that this List is our own Forum, in the center
of our political, religious, and day-to-day lives, this is the
equivalent of visitors standing in the Forum listening to us. I see
that as a good thing.

As to the laws, well, ancient Rome had whole buildings full of scrolls
and tablets with laws on them; it is entirely in keeping with the
Roman mind that laws are passed to respond to growing concerns and
actions within the res publica. It is not the number of laws that
should concern us, but rather how the laws are written and to what
purpose we use them.

One thing that has become overwhelmingly clear to me since the
discussions at the Conventus and the Galerius Paulinus issue is that
the Romans looked at something --- anything --- and asked, "Is this
USEFUL?"; i.e., can a citizen read it, pick it up, use it; does it
affect their lives in a meaningful way? We might want to consider
approaching our tabularium in the same way.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37037 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Conventus Flashbacks (II)
G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.

Salvete omnes!

Some more Conventus notes:

Octavius Minor of Hispania changed from a mild-mannered, relatively
quiet gentleman with glasses and guidebook into OCTAVIANUS MINOR, in
full Roman military dress (without weapons, as it's tough to get a
gladius on an airplane and through customs these days). The kicker is
that, as Astur explained, they make all their equipment themselves,
and the level of quality, detail, and care is astonishing. Compared
with the gentlemen who pose as Roman soldiers outside the Colosseum
for tourist photographs, Octavianus looked as if he really could have
stepped out of the pages of Republican history.

The aedile Iulius Sulla was the essence of calm and politeness ---
until we got to the spot where Iulius Caesar was struck down, outside
the Theatre of Pompey. Then, he got angry --- he seemed to take it
personally, a sort of affront to his familia :-)
Also, he, being a native of the city of Pisa, reminded me that the
Leaning Tower is NOT the only thing in his city, and I learned quite a
bit about Pisa and the cities around her.

Livia, the charming governor of Britannia displayed an almost
fetish-like love of ice cream. Day or night, the sign "GELATERIA"
seemed to draw her like a moth to a flame. As a governor and aedile,
she was on occasion the highest-ranking member of the government
present --- so there was little we could do but obey her and somehow
suffer through eating cornettos....mmmmmmm....cornettos......

At one point in Ostia Antica, Caesar, Sulla, Agricola, and I found
ourselves in the midst of a (friendly) heated discussion --- then
looked around and realised that we were standing in an open area
surrounded by columns. It was the ancient marketplace behind the
Theatre. We were literally echoing our forebears' voices.

Also in Ostia, there was a gift shop, displaying a set of Roman armor.
As I sipped a refreshing beverage on the patio outside, I saw several
of our citizens clustered around it, pointing out what was acceptable
and discussing the historical flaws.

Singing "Gaudeamus Igitur" together, mumbling through the bits we
couldn't remember...

Trying to figure out exactly how the doors at the tomb of Caecilia
Metella worked, on the Via Appia Antica...

Standing atop the tomb of the Curatii, looking across at the tomb of
the Horatii near the little curve in the Via Appia Antica which
(Persusianus explained) may be a tribute to the ancient border between
Rome and Alba...

The saltatio fatua patricia...

Agricola, with his insane amount of knowledge and ever-present maps,
being able to ferret out the locations of just about everything ---
even if there were only small piles of bricks and a few random bits of
marble present...

More to come!

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37038 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
C. Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

As a Pontifex of the Collegium Pontificum I issue the following statement:

The activities of the Collegium Pontificum shall be as transparent as the
Pontifex Maximus, Marcus Cassius Julianus, wishes it to be. If the Pontifex
Maximus wants to divulge the votes of the individual pontifices that is his
prerogative. How the Pontifex Maximus manages the reporting of the Collegium
Pontificum is his choice, and he is the Pontifex Maximus for life -- so he is
free to report as he pleases. Individual pontifices are not responsible the
transparency of the Collegium Pontificum, although I (as a pontifex) am more
than happy to let people know my individual positions on topics.

Valete;

C. Fabius Buteo Modianus
Pontifex
Flamen Pomonalis
Augur

In a message dated 8/12/2005 6:12:16 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
mlcinnyc@... writes:

At the Conventus, I was privileged to be involved in many discussions
about the role of the religio in our res publica, and how to create an
atmosphere of collegiality and education for our citizens regarding
the State religion both in public and private. The overwhelming,
common conclusion was for the College of Pontiffs to open the doors of
their temples and tell the People what they are doing, in private, to
advance the religio for the benefit of the res publica; to make those
private things public.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37039 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
Salve,

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
<mlcinnyc@y...> wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato Fr. Apulo Caesari Q. Cassio Calvo S.P.D.
>
> Salvete viri.
>
> I have spoken with the Consul Caesar about this very idea, and he
> himself spoke very passionately about it at the Conventus during
the
> contio, and I agree, to a great extent.
>
> Calvus, the only area in which I might disagree slightly is that
there
> is more to the res publica than numbers. Since I have been acting
as
> a moderator of this Forum under the imperium of my praetor Arminus
> Fausts, I have seen the numbers of people on it grow from 600+ to
over
> 1000.

But I thought it wasn't about numbers?


> As to the laws, well, ancient Rome had whole buildings full of
scrolls
> and tablets with laws on them;

Ancient Rome also had huge swaths of territory and millions of
people to govern. Nova Roma has 10 acres of barren desert and
population of less than a thousand. If you count tarantulas and
rattlesnakes, then maybe our population is really in the millions.

> One thing that has become overwhelmingly clear to me since the
> discussions at the Conventus and the Galerius Paulinus issue is

Yes, I'm sure everything for the next year was all worked out at the
Conventus. The rest of us poor benighted souls eagerly await to see
what our betters have decided to inflict, I mean, enlighten us with.

Vale,

Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37040 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
C. Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

The controversy over the Religio Romana being "Orthopraxic" only and nothing
else is an argument that has plagued this list for some time. The mind of a
Monotheist, typically, thinks dogmatically. My mind does not think this
way, nor does the minds of other "self-styled" Pagan men and women.
Spirituality and dogmatism are not the same thing.

I am not going to attempt to define spirituality; as it is an individual
experiential phenomenon.

Orthopraxy is right action, a liturgical formula for performing correct
ceremonies. This is a very important aspect of the Religo Romana -- and it is
also a very important aspect of ANY religion that implements liturgy (divine or
otherwise). A priest in the Catholic or Orthodox Church cannot conduct the
sacraments -- for example -- without taking into mind the proper matter and
form (i.e., orthopraxic formula). The Catholic Church has always taught that
even a "bad" (or faithless) priest can conduct Mass, if he is a properly
ordained priest. If he has undergone the "correct" form of the ordination
ritual, he is a priest. This is an example of orthopraxy.

Furthermore, the Religio Romana is more than simple Orthopraxy. It is a
"spiritual practice" that many people have faith in. That people believe in.
That can move men, and women, to tears and devotion. It is not simply a cold
formula to be recited and forgotten. It is about loyalty to the Gods. Honor
to the Gods. Friendship with the Gods.

As a Pontifex of Nova Roma I have a solemn duty and obligation to uphold my
priesthood. As a Pontifex of Nova Roma I state clearly that the Religio
Romana is NOT *just* an Orthopraxic institution. The other Pontifices are free
to agree or disagree with me in this. However, individual citizens are not
required to embrace the Gods of Rome -- such is our ways.

Individual citizens, such as G. Equitius Cato, are free to issue statements
that the Religio is nothing more than Orthopraxy. Orthopraxy is a word. My
spiritual beliefs, nor are the spiritual beliefs of my co-religionists,
relegated to a simple word coined by some academic. I issue my statement as an
official Pontifex of Nova Roma.

Those of us who believe in the Gods of Rome do not stand behind the banner
of "orthopraxy." We stand behind the Banner of the Immortals.

Valete;

C. Fabius Buteo Modianus
Pontifex
Flamen Pomonalis
Augur

In a message dated 8/12/2005 6:12:16 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
mlcinnyc@... writes:

The key is, I think, that while Orthodoxy does have orthopractic
elements, the religio romana does NOT have orthodoxic requirements in
any case or under any circumstances. That you, as a self-styled
"Pagan man", happen to have an orthodoxic element to your private
religious practice is a laudable thing; to assume that anyone else
"should" have anything similiar in regards to the religio (or, in
fact, ANY private cultus) is, however, unsupportable by historic
practice.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37041 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
G. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano S.P.D.

Salve Buteo Modianus.

I will only observe the following:

You wrote,

"Individual pontifices are not responsible [for] the transparency of
the Collegium Pontificum, although I (as a pontifex) am more
than happy to let people know my individual positions on topics."

I applaud your personal sentiments, in that you are offering your
"positions on topics". And if I were talking about hearing your
positions on topics, I'd just ask you for them, and am glad that you
are willing to share them.

However, that is not the point I am making. "As a pontiff &c.", I do
not want to just hear your positions on "topics"; I want to hear about
your practice of the religio; I want to hear you describe the rites
and rituals you are performing on behalf of the res publica. I want
to hear the prayers you say, read the actions you take, and have you
describe their foundation in ancient text sources. If there are no
ancient Roman text sources, I want to hear the sources and authorities
from which you *do* draw your practices.

And I want to hear about the religio romana, not any other pagan
religious practice, because the religio romana is the State religion.
And I would like to hear the practices of the religio from each of
the pontiffs, flamens, augurs and sacerdotes to whom the People have
given the authority to act for the res publica.

L. Equitius Cincinnatus Augur has detailed rites he has performed as
flamen Martialis; F. Galerius Aurelianus has shown rites performed as
flamen Cerealis. Aside from these two, to my knowledge, we have not
heard from a single flamen or pontiff or augur or sacerdote regarding
the performance of the duties they have chosen to accept as
representatives of the State to the gods in a very very long time.
How are the People to learn about the religio? How do the People know
that the State is being watched out for by her priests?

Yes, there is at least one religio List for discussions about the
religio, but I am talking about the public rites; by their very
definition should not these ceremonies be performed in public, for the
People to see and hear? Just because the individual pontiffs are not
"responsible" for doing so, should they not *desire* to do so out of
respect for the People in whose name they serve? Just because
something does not HAVE to be done does not mean it SHOULD NOT be done.

This is NOT an "attack" on the College of Pontiffs or anyone else who
serves the res publica in the name of the religio; it is a plea to them.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37042 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Salvete;

The last public ritual I performed was at Pagan Spirit Gathering in June,
located Southwestern Ohio. I performed the same ritual that I did last year at
Pagan Spirit Gathering last year, Elysium Gathering, and Dayton Pagan Pride
Day (June, September, and October). I will conduct another public Rite of
Offering to Pomona at Elysium Gathering -- but will not have time to conduct it
at Dayton Pagan Pride Day.

I host Elysium Gathering, a Pagan Festival in Ohio held in September. So
far we have one workshop (conducted by Metellus Postumianus) on the Religio
Romana scheduled, and a Roman Ritual.

I have conducted several workshops at local and regional Pagan festivals on
the Religio Romana. Last year I was interviewed by a local weekly newspaper,
and the interview and several photos of Roman ritual were included in the
paper.

Valete;

C. Fabius Buteo Modianus

In a message dated 8/12/2005 10:23:11 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
mlcinnyc@... writes:

And I want to hear about the religio romana, not any other pagan
religious practice, because the religio romana is the State religion.
And I would like to hear the practices of the religio from each of
the pontiffs, flamens, augurs and sacerdotes to whom the People have
given the authority to act for the res publica.






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37043 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Absence
C. Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

I will be leaving very early Sunday morning on a much needed vacation for
one week. I will return late Sunday night on August 21st. If you need to
reach me, please send me a private e-mail and I will respond as quickly as I
possibly can.

I will check my e-mail briefly tomorrow.

Valete;

C. Fabius Buteo Modianus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37044 From: mfalco1 Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
Salvete Omnes,

Ancient Rome also had huge swaths of territory and millions of
> people to govern. Nova Roma has 10 acres of barren desert and
> population of less than a thousand. If you count tarantulas and
> rattlesnakes, then maybe our population is really in the millions.
>

> Yes, I'm sure everything for the next year was all worked out at
the
> Conventus. The rest of us poor benighted souls eagerly await to
see
> what our betters have decided to inflict, I mean, enlighten us with.

Some of you may be frustrated with certain magistrates, the Religio
or Collegium Pontificum, or maybe even another privatus. Not everyone
is going to agree on everything even half the time. This is a
Republic hence tyranny of the masses. Suck it up and drive on! If
you have nothing constructive to add, then why say anything at all?
Try and get yourself elected into an office with the imperium
neccessary to effect the changes you'd want to make. This
organization attracts the politcally and religious minded, that's the
nature of the beast. Really if it's all that bad, then no one is
holding a gun at your head to stay.

That's just my humble opinion. I may sound like a hypocrite but hey
enough is enough, let's deal with some real issues.

Falco.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "quintuscassiuscalvus"
<richmal@c...> wrote:
> Salve,
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
> <mlcinnyc@y...> wrote:
> > G. Equitius Cato Fr. Apulo Caesari Q. Cassio Calvo S.P.D.
> >
> > Salvete viri.
> >
> > I have spoken with the Consul Caesar about this very idea, and he
> > himself spoke very passionately about it at the Conventus during
> the
> > contio, and I agree, to a great extent.
> >
> > Calvus, the only area in which I might disagree slightly is that
> there
> > is more to the res publica than numbers. Since I have been
acting
> as
> > a moderator of this Forum under the imperium of my praetor Arminus
> > Fausts, I have seen the numbers of people on it grow from 600+ to
> over
> > 1000.
>
> But I thought it wasn't about numbers?
>
>
> > As to the laws, well, ancient Rome had whole buildings full of
> scrolls
> > and tablets with laws on them;
>
> Ancient Rome also had huge swaths of territory and millions of
> people to govern. Nova Roma has 10 acres of barren desert and
> population of less than a thousand. If you count tarantulas and
> rattlesnakes, then maybe our population is really in the millions.
>
> > One thing that has become overwhelmingly clear to me since the
> > discussions at the Conventus and the Galerius Paulinus issue is
>
> Yes, I'm sure everything for the next year was all worked out at
the
> Conventus. The rest of us poor benighted souls eagerly await to
see
> what our betters have decided to inflict, I mean, enlighten us with.
>
> Vale,
>
> Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37045 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
G. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano S.P.D.

You wrote,

"Those of us who believe in the Gods of Rome do not stand behind the
banner of 'orthopraxy.' We stand behind the Banner of the Immortals."

And that is a wonderful sentiment.

It is, however, completely and absolutely unhistoric. To attach any
kind of orthodoxy to the public practice of the religio romana is not
supported by any ancient Roman text source whatsoever, and indeed is
directly denied by at least one very Roman source. I encourage you to
believe privately whatever makes you feel the presence of the Divine;
to ascribe any necessity of belief to the public practice of the
religio romana is incorrect, divisive, and dangerous.


Now, you also wrote a while ago,

"Yes, the Religio Romana is Orthopraxic and does not demand belief...
Belief is simply an attitude towards something. You don't have to
believe in the Gods to be a magistrate... Just because a religion is
orthopraxic (vs. orthodoxic) does not mean that belief is not common."

Gaius Iulius Scaurus once wrote,

"Ritual orthopraxis is the single most important characteristic of the
Religio Romana."

So, you yourself, and Iulius Scaurus have both pointed out that
orthopraxy, not any system of belief (i.e., orthodoxy) is the
foundation of the religio romana.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37046 From: Dan Date: 2005-08-12
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
L. Modius Kaelus; salve Cato, salvete omnibusque.

A correction to your statement, mi amice. Scaurus has released a
text-based recording of a few of the rituals he performed publically
on behalf of the res publica and in his office as a pontifex. I
believe it has been quite some time since he has submitted anything,
however.


Be assured however that there are many doing much to promote the
Religio Romana.

I've had the opportunity to work actively with Modia Lupa on the
Temple of Diana project, and speak with Arnamentia about her ideas. I
can tell you that these priestesses have not ceased in their work in
the formation of ritual, research, or the establishment of an eventual
temple. Modia Lupa has revealed much of her domestic practises and
private devotions on various mailing lists, including here. There does
need to be an increase in public ritual and visibility among
practitioners, ordained and non-ordained alike. Perhaps this will even
act as the catalyst for a renaissance of sorts among practitioners.

The advice I give to non-practitioners right now is to ASK, and join
the appropriate mailing lists. Most priests of the republic would be
more than happy to talk about their private devotions and any public
ritual they may conduct.

Thankfully, I live in a location where I can see public rituals
performed and even take part, if I so wish. While going to the student
union at my university to use the ATM, I glanced to my side and saw
Buteo Modianus on the cover of a popular Dayton publication making an
offering to Pomona (fully togate, even). And I'm doubly blessed to
have belonged to gens Modia, made up completely of those who honour
the gods, and live in a state with a relatively high concentration of
practitioners. I've had the opportunity to speak with them face to
face on a few occasions, though sadly I missed the opportunity to meet
Germanicus and Piscinus last month.

So perhaps some practitioners like myself who have been so blessed do
not realise that visibility of the religio publica is scant in some
areas and among various individuals. I'm fully aware that what is
currently done is FAR from enough, and I'll do what I can to both
increase the religio romana and bring the things I am priviledged to
witness to the people. I'll be at the annual offering Buteo Modianus
makes in his office as flamen (he'll also be assisted by Metellus).
I'll attempt to record the ritual on digital video for upload; if I
can't do that, I'll take photographs at the very least in addition to
scanning any news articles in our area.

Though I am not a priest, I'll also post my private devotions as I did
in the past, and with their permission, forward any submissions I see
elsewhere by others.

Vale et valete,
Kaelus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano S.P.D.
>
> Salve Buteo Modianus.
>
> I will only observe the following:
>
> You wrote,
>
> "Individual pontifices are not responsible [for] the transparency of
> the Collegium Pontificum, although I (as a pontifex) am more
> than happy to let people know my individual positions on topics."
>
> I applaud your personal sentiments, in that you are offering your
> "positions on topics". And if I were talking about hearing your
> positions on topics, I'd just ask you for them, and am glad that you
> are willing to share them.
>
> However, that is not the point I am making. "As a pontiff &c.", I do
> not want to just hear your positions on "topics"; I want to hear about
> your practice of the religio; I want to hear you describe the rites
> and rituals you are performing on behalf of the res publica. I want
> to hear the prayers you say, read the actions you take, and have you
> describe their foundation in ancient text sources. If there are no
> ancient Roman text sources, I want to hear the sources and authorities
> from which you *do* draw your practices.
>
> And I want to hear about the religio romana, not any other pagan
> religious practice, because the religio romana is the State religion.
> And I would like to hear the practices of the religio from each of
> the pontiffs, flamens, augurs and sacerdotes to whom the People have
> given the authority to act for the res publica.
>
> L. Equitius Cincinnatus Augur has detailed rites he has performed as
> flamen Martialis; F. Galerius Aurelianus has shown rites performed as
> flamen Cerealis. Aside from these two, to my knowledge, we have not
> heard from a single flamen or pontiff or augur or sacerdote regarding
> the performance of the duties they have chosen to accept as
> representatives of the State to the gods in a very very long time.
> How are the People to learn about the religio? How do the People know
> that the State is being watched out for by her priests?
>
> Yes, there is at least one religio List for discussions about the
> religio, but I am talking about the public rites; by their very
> definition should not these ceremonies be performed in public, for the
> People to see and hear? Just because the individual pontiffs are not
> "responsible" for doing so, should they not *desire* to do so out of
> respect for the People in whose name they serve? Just because
> something does not HAVE to be done does not mean it SHOULD NOT be done.
>
> This is NOT an "attack" on the College of Pontiffs or anyone else who
> serves the res publica in the name of the religio; it is a plea to them.
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37047 From: GAIVS IVLIANVS Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: BONA NEMORALIA!
Salvete omnes! August 13th is the IDVS, but also the
NEMORALIA honoring Diana, as well as Castor and
Pollux! To all I wish a propitious Ides and a BONA
NEMORALIA!!! Valete! GAIVS IVLIVS IVLIANVS, PGI

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37048 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
In a message dated 8/12/2005 6:49:40 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
richmal@... writes:
Yes, I'm sure everything for the next year was all worked out at the
Conventus. The rest of us poor benighted souls eagerly await to see
what our betters have decided to inflict, I mean, enlighten us with.
If this is the case, this really bothers me. You cannot be part of the power
elite unless
you travel to Rome, to take part in a feel good exercise? And why wasn't our
other Consul
there? If all of you attending this meeting had put up 10 euros each, I'm
sure he would have matched funds. To me this would be the equivlent of
Cassius, Vedius, Equitius, Iunius,
Marinius, Municius, Marius, Drusus and I attending Roman days, and deciding
the fate
of the Republic, with no one from Europe attending.

These meetings are great to meet people who are only letters on a glowing
screen but otherwise business in Nova Roma is conducted in the Forum and in the
Senate.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37050 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
G. Equitius Cato Q. Fabio Maximo Q. Cassio Calvo quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Hmmmmm......

Calvus and Maximus, let me simply make clear that I have described
discussions, not edicta or leges or any other kind of decision-making
exercize on the part of any magistrate. These were discussions that
were useful and encouraging precisely because they did not hinge on
misunderstandings of the type that you both seem to have made, because
we had the chance to complete those discussions in person rather than
laboriously having to correct any misunderstandings with a series of
speeches in the Forum like this one.

Calvus, "everything" was not "worked out" for the next year; but we
all came away from the Conventus knowing more about each other's work
in their provincia and with a challenge to do more, to learn more, to
work harder at making our res publica real and effective in the
macronational world. Is it that offensive that I can walk away from
this meeting with a renewed sense of purpose and energy?

Maximus, if you felt it was so important that the junor consul attend,
why did you not suggest the subsidization you mention before the
Conventus began? The date of the Conventus did not simply spring
forth full-blown like Minerva from Iuppiter's head and surprise
everyone. Or you could have offered to subsidize him yourself. Did
you discuss this with the junior consul? Did you ask if there might
have been another, macronational, reason why he was unable to attend?
Has he expressed some kind of bitterness (as opposed to regret) that
he was not there?

And why yes, Maximus, I felt very good at the Conventus, and if you
have a problem with that I have no answer for you. What you have
dismissed as a "feel good exercize" is at the very heart and soul of
the res publica: groups of its citizens meeting, eating, drinking, and
talking together face to face in the macronational world. The "power
elite"? A group of citizens from eight countries gathered together to
enjoy each other's company? I would not mind being considered a
member of the "power elite" (what real Roman would?) but that
certainly was not an issue at the Conventus. Not everything is about
"power", Maximus; sometimes it can be just about creating and/or
renewing friendships, and finding surprising commonality where one
never imagined it could exist.

The phrase you use, "with no one from Europe attending", has its
reverse: "with no one from the U.S. attending", and that is simply not
true, because I am from the U.S. and by gum, I was there. I did not
claim to represent the entire U.S., nor did any other attendee claim
representative power for their respective macronational country.

It is a pity that something that engendered so much interest and
humour and energy should be dismissed so tritely and unthinkingly.

I trust that the rest of the citizenry will not be quite
so...mean-spirited...in their consideration of the events that took place.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37051 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Conventus update
gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:

G. Equitius Cato Fr. Apulo Caesari M. Valeriae Messalinae
quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes!

Yes, the cats were everywhere and quite well-behaved :-)

<In the piazza next to my apartment, there was a large section of Roman ruins, including the temple of Fortuna Huisce Diei; alongside the ruins is an actual cat sanctuary, where the cats have been given a safe haven and live quite well. The Consul explained at one point
that there is a very strong idea in Rome that all living things have the right to live where they are born --- so the cats are now a living example of this idea.>

Sounds like a great idea to me! The good thing about having all those cats around is having less rats around. Apologies to all rat lovers on the ML. Think I'll go talk to my horse now.

<How about Nova Roma creates playing cards with the great philosophers, writers, and statesmen of the Republican age?>

I can see this! Poker with Pliny.

Okay, maybe not.

Glad you had a good time.

Valete bene,

Maxima Valeria Messallina



---------------------------------
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37052 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Conventus update
gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:

G. Equitius Cato Fr. Apulo Caesari M. Valeriae Messalinae
quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes!

Yes, the cats were everywhere and quite well-behaved :-)

<In the piazza next to my apartment, there was a large section of Roman ruins, including the temple of Fortuna Huisce Diei; alongside the ruins is an actual cat sanctuary, where the cats have been given a safe haven and live quite well. The Consul explained at one point
that there is a very strong idea in Rome that all living things have the right to live where they are born --- so the cats are now a living example of this idea.>

Sounds like a great idea to me! The good thing about having all those cats around is having less rats around. Apologies to all rat lovers on the ML. Think I'll go talk to my horse now.

<How about Nova Roma creates playing cards with the great philosophers, writers, and statesmen of the Republican age?>

I can see this! Poker with Pliny.

Okay, maybe not.

Glad you had a good time.

Valete bene,

Maxima Valeria Messallina


---------------------------------
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37053 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Conventus update
Oops! Don't know what happened there. Yahoo has been misbehaving this morning and sent my last email twice.
My apologies.

Maxima Valeria Messallina




---------------------------------
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37054 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
Salve all, the real issue IS what Calvus states.I was
disillusioned my first couple of months here but
decided to stay just to spite the lawyer-types.I love
NR.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mfalco1@...>
wrote:
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> Ancient Rome also had huge swaths of territory and
millions of
> > people to govern. Nova Roma has 10 acres of
barren desert and
> > population of less than a thousand. If you count
tarantulas and
> > rattlesnakes, then maybe our population is really
in the millions.
> >
>
> > Yes, I'm sure everything for the next year was all
worked out at
> the
> > Conventus. The rest of us poor benighted souls
eagerly await to
> see
> > what our betters have decided to inflict, I mean,
enlighten us with.
>
> Some of you may be frustrated with certain
magistrates, the Religio
> or Collegium Pontificum, or maybe even another
privatus. Not everyone
> is going to agree on everything even half the time.
This is a
> Republic hence tyranny of the masses. Suck it up and
drive on! If
> you have nothing constructive to add, then why say
anything at all?
> Try and get yourself elected into an office with the
imperium
> neccessary to effect the changes you'd want to make.
This
> organization attracts the politcally and religious
minded, that's the
> nature of the beast. Really if it's all that bad,
then no one is
> holding a gun at your head to stay.
>
> That's just my humble opinion. I may sound like a
hypocrite but hey
> enough is enough, let's deal with some real issues.
>
> Falco.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com,
"quintuscassiuscalvus"
> <richmal@c...> wrote:
> > Salve,
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com,
"gaiusequitiuscato"
> > <mlcinnyc@y...> wrote:
> > > G. Equitius Cato Fr. Apulo Caesari Q. Cassio
Calvo S.P.D.
> > >
> > > Salvete viri.
> > >
> > > I have spoken with the Consul Caesar about this
very idea, and he
> > > himself spoke very passionately about it at the
Conventus during
> > the
> > > contio, and I agree, to a great extent.
> > >
> > > Calvus, the only area in which I might disagree
slightly is that
> > there
> > > is more to the res publica than numbers. Since
I have been
> acting
> > as
> > > a moderator of this Forum under the imperium of
my praetor Arminus
> > > Fausts, I have seen the numbers of people on it
grow from 600+ to
> > over
> > > 1000.
> >
> > But I thought it wasn't about numbers?
> >
> >
> > > As to the laws, well, ancient Rome had whole
buildings full of
> > scrolls
> > > and tablets with laws on them;
> >
> > Ancient Rome also had huge swaths of territory and
millions of
> > people to govern. Nova Roma has 10 acres of
barren desert and
> > population of less than a thousand. If you count
tarantulas and
> > rattlesnakes, then maybe our population is really
in the millions.
> >
> > > One thing that has become overwhelmingly clear
to me since the
> > > discussions at the Conventus and the Galerius
Paulinus issue is
> >
> > Yes, I'm sure everything for the next year was all
worked out at
> the
> > Conventus. The rest of us poor benighted souls
eagerly await to
> see
> > what our betters have decided to inflict, I mean,
enlighten us with.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Calvus
>
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37055 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
Salve, by Hades Im a right-wing Old Glory waving,saber
rattling type myself and I would have LOVED to have
been around other Romani just enjoying Romaness,YEA!
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato Q. Fabio Maximo Q. Cassio Calvo
quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> Hmmmmm......
>
> Calvus and Maximus, let me simply make clear that I
have described
> discussions, not edicta or leges or any other kind
of decision-making
> exercize on the part of any magistrate. These were
discussions that
> were useful and encouraging precisely because they
did not hinge on
> misunderstandings of the type that you both seem to
have made, because
> we had the chance to complete those discussions in
person rather than
> laboriously having to correct any misunderstandings
with a series of
> speeches in the Forum like this one.
>
> Calvus, "everything" was not "worked out" for the
next year; but we
> all came away from the Conventus knowing more about
each other's work
> in their provincia and with a challenge to do more,
to learn more, to
> work harder at making our res publica real and
effective in the
> macronational world. Is it that offensive that I
can walk away from
> this meeting with a renewed sense of purpose and
energy?
>
> Maximus, if you felt it was so important that the
junor consul attend,
> why did you not suggest the subsidization you
mention before the
> Conventus began? The date of the Conventus did not
simply spring
> forth full-blown like Minerva from Iuppiter's head
and surprise
> everyone. Or you could have offered to subsidize
him yourself. Did
> you discuss this with the junior consul? Did you
ask if there might
> have been another, macronational, reason why he was
unable to attend?
> Has he expressed some kind of bitterness (as
opposed to regret) that
> he was not there?
>
> And why yes, Maximus, I felt very good at the
Conventus, and if you
> have a problem with that I have no answer for you.
What you have
> dismissed as a "feel good exercize" is at the very
heart and soul of
> the res publica: groups of its citizens meeting,
eating, drinking, and
> talking together face to face in the macronational
world. The "power
> elite"? A group of citizens from eight countries
gathered together to
> enjoy each other's company? I would not mind being
considered a
> member of the "power elite" (what real Roman would?)
but that
> certainly was not an issue at the Conventus. Not
everything is about
> "power", Maximus; sometimes it can be just about
creating and/or
> renewing friendships, and finding surprising
commonality where one
> never imagined it could exist.
>
> The phrase you use, "with no one from Europe
attending", has its
> reverse: "with no one from the U.S. attending", and
that is simply not
> true, because I am from the U.S. and by gum, I was
there. I did not
> claim to represent the entire U.S., nor did any
other attendee claim
> representative power for their respective
macronational country.
>
> It is a pity that something that engendered so much
interest and
> humour and energy should be dismissed so tritely and
unthinkingly.
>
> I trust that the rest of the citizenry will not be
quite
> so...mean-spirited...in their consideration of the
events that took place.
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37056 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
A. Ambrosius Celetrus C. Fabio Buteoni Modiano

AthanasiosofSpfd@... wrote:

> The last public ritual I performed was at Pagan Spirit Gathering in
> June, located Southwestern Ohio.
>
> I host Elysium Gathering, a Pagan Festival in Ohio held in
> September.
>
> I have conducted several workshops at local and regional Pagan
> festivals on the Religio Romana.

What does any of this have to do with the demonstrable fact that you and
the rest of the CP publicly and shamefully ignore the feriae of the Gods
and Goddesses here in Nova Roma, leaving any mention of their festivals
solely to the non-practioner Equitius Cato?

Let us look just at this past sacral year.

Kalendis Martiis: the beginning of the sacral year and the Festival of
Juno Lucina passed unhonored by ANY member of the official religious
establishment on either this or the "official" Religio Romana list.
Cato's write up was nice enough, but totally inadequate. For instance,
absolutely no mention was made in it that the sacred fire of Vesta was
ceremonially rekindled every New Year's Day - a rather important
theological and psychological aspect of the Religio Romana, one would
think, and worthy of note and discussion, unless one was a member of the
CP with better things to do.

prid. Idus Martius: the second Equirria passed unhonored by any member
of the CP on either list.

Idibus Martiis: did any member of the CP lead Nova Roma in the
celebration of the Annae Perennae? No, just an honorable mention by Cato
on this list, and silence Religio list.

post. Id. Mar. (16th): G. Equitius Cato (non-practioner) announced to
this Main List, in post #34152, "Today is the celebration of the
Compitalia." This was very interesting. The sources I've read place this
moveable feast between a.d. III Non. Jan. to Non. Jan., and indeed on
prid. Non. Jan., in a rare display of publicly behaving like a Pontifex
Maximus, M. Cassius Julianus posted "ANNOUNCEMENT - Moveable Feriae
2005" on Main List (#32080), in which he announced "The Compitalia, the
Celebration of the Lares Compitales, will be tomorrow - Wednesday,
January 5th."

Did you, or any other member of the CP, or of Nova Roma's official
religious establishment, bother to point out Cato's error, and/or
deliberate affront to the Pontifex Maximus? I waited for it to happen,
but I guess you all were too busy getting your pictures on the cover of
the "Rolling Stones," or any old local rag that'll print it.

The Liberalia, the Agonalia, the Quinquatrus, the Tubilustrium...the
list of feriae completely ignored on both this and the "official"
Religio Romana list, by those of you who how vowed to publicly honor the
Gods and Goddesses of Rome, is shamefully complete - every one so far in
this sacral year, I think, save for those honored by the
uncharacteristic efforts of the flamen Martialis and the flamen
Cerealis. Eheu, what's the point in wasting more of my time cataloguing
them. Pick one - it wasn't honored.

No, you are content to leave it up to Cato, and evidently are not
bothered by the fact that he mocks the Religio even as he pretends to
honor it (see post #35578 for June 9th, The Vestalia. He noted three
events for that day, the sacred Vestalia as one, the feast of the
Orthodox St. Ephraem as another, and "LAST BUT NOT LEAST [his words, my
emphasis], the birthday of Donald Duck. Given that Cato is Orthodox, it
is simple math to know which event, regardless of the copy he devoted to
it, is least in his list).

You wrote: "Those of us who believe in the Gods of Rome do not stand
behind the banner
of "orthopraxy." We stand behind the Banner of the Immortals."

No Buteo, you don't - not unless you feel your priestly prerogatives are
threatened by anyone here in Nova Roma, or you have a chance at a photo
op.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37057 From: Marcus Horatius Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Roman spirituality
Salvete Quirites, comreligiones et Novae Romani omnes


"What does it matter by which wisdom each of us arrives at Truth? It is not possibly that only one road leads to so sublime a mystery."



I do not recall how so very often I have now quoted from the relatio of Aurelius Symmacchus. He had written this passage to a Christian emperor. More often I have had occasion to use it in addressing fellow practitioners of the religio Romana to remind them that our tradition is wonderfully rich in its diversity. Perhaps due to its own diversity, the religio Romana also has a tradition of tolerance towards the religious faiths of others. People seem to focus on the few times when the religio confronted other religious traditions, but in point of fact the Romans were the most tolerant of all ancient peoples, showing the greatest respect to all culti Deorum ex patria. Modern practitioners of the religio Romana would do well to remember this and exemplify their spiritual ancestors, towards one another and towards those who follow in other religious traditions.



I have read some comments here about orthodoxy and orthopraxy in the religio Romana. Orthodoxy is dismissed as a feature of the religio Romana because the Romans held so many different beliefs. There really was not any orthopraxy in the religio Romana for the very same reason. Each altar, sanctuary, and temple precinct had its own unique lex templi that outlined proper conduct of ritual within its boundaries. The manner in which Jupiter was worshipped in the Capitolium atop Mons Saturnus was not the same as worship conducted to Him as Jupiter Feretrius at the foot of that same sacred hill. Each sanctuary of Diana, each of Juno, Minerva Medica, Minerva Capitolia, that most chaste dancer, all had their own cultus. Each sodalitates, each gens and each family had their own forms of worship to follow. Each Latin city and every Roman colonia had their own culti Deorum as well. Patricians had their own particular culti Deorum, distinct in some ways from the culti Deorum found among the
plebeians. In each cultus Dei you can say there was orthopraxy, but to say that there was orthopraxy in the religio Romana itself is rather misleading. Diversity in practice and belief was a feature of the religio Romana in ancient times. Any modern practitioner who would insist that orthopraxy be adopted in todayÂ’s religio Romana is not advocating that the mos maiorum be followed any more than if he would insist upon an orthodoxy in belief.



Romans did hold certain beliefs, not written out in any sort of dogma perhaps, but certainly implicit in their practices. There was a formal side to the religio Romana, very important in its practices, but no less so was the ecstatic side in Roman beliefs and practices. The religio Romana originated within an ecstatic tradition that ever after informed much of Roman practice. The formal side of the religio Romana is easier to explain, so perhaps it is focused upon in scholarly works about the Roman tradition. The ecstatic side involves Roman spirituality, which is not easy to explain in any religious tradition, so perhaps it is too often neglected. Roman spirituality involves meeting with the Gods directly, in a personal relationship, often familial in nature, as we share a common community with the Gods. "If you have ever come upon a grove, thick with ancient trees," perhaps, as with Seneca, it "will create in you a feeling of the divine presence." This is how the religio Romana
originated. The Romans did not invent their Gods, they did not borrow Gods from other cultures, as though they had no understanding. Instead they came upon the Gods, met with Them, interacted with Them, spoke with Them, in such places which the Gods had touched. Even Cicero, who is not known as being a particularly religious man, speaks of "intuiting the Gods." Roman legends speak of how Numa Pompilius entered such a grove and spoke directly to Pater Jupiter, and how by meeting personally with Egeria, Faunus and Jupiter through esoteric and ecstatic rites he was to pass down to us rites that we follow to this day. It would be silly to think that this tradition ended with the spirituality of one man when the Romans so often spoke of emulating his example, meeting with and calling upon the Gods themselves for instruction in their faith. All of the contentiousness I have seen over the years about what is "proper practice" has only served to cause divisions among ourselves while
ignoring what true practice of the religio Romana is really about. And also, ignoring our own spiritual tradition serves only to cause a chasm between ourselves and those of other religious traditions, which cannot benefit such a community as is found in Nova Roma.



Some years ago when I first came to Nova Roma in May 2000, I posted a response concerning my own spirituality in the religious tradition of my family and my attitude towards the spirituality of others in different religious traditions. Perhaps it is worth repeating again as I have recently returned to Nova Roma:



"I feel that if one truly believes in a deity, a deity of any kind, then it must truly be a humbling experience. How then could someone who truly approaches their deity with humility do anything other than question everything they have come to believe. Who more so than Plato in the Parmenides critically examined Plato's system of thought? And what are the wonderful poems by the mystic Jelaluddin Rumi but an approach to his God Allah through a questioning of himself? Reflected in the piety of such men I must always examine myself. Did not your Jesus have a moment of doubt, and confronted himself in a garden before he resolved to meet his destiny? And to whom did Arjuna speak in his moment of hesitation on the battlefield? Or to whom did Socrates speak? Who is the Poimandres with whom Trismegistis speaks? Having such examples presented to us, can we do any less? And when it becomes our turn to lie upon our deathbed will we have the confidence of Plotinus that that which is the better
part of ourselves shall return to whence it came? Like you I examine my own beliefs by holding them up to the light I find in the beliefs of others. The words of others and the sacred texts of many different belief systems give me pause to think of my own beliefs. I would therefore welcome anyone to discuss such topics with me. But also, as I was discussing with another citizen, dear Pompeia, such discussions only move the intellect. As a pagan I know that my intellect might approach my soul, but only through experiencing the divine may my soul reunite in ek stasis with my Goddess and together shall we pass on to whence we came. That perhaps is the distinction I make between philosophy and religion, the differences between the experiences of the animus and the anima."


Or another way that I have put it so often to my students at the Academia Thules, and in SVR, in the Temple of Religio Romana and elsewhere, you will not learn so very much about the religio Romana in any book you may read, or by reading any of my rambling posts, that only move the intellect, as you will through experience by following the advice of Virgil who encourages us to "foot the rugged dance and chant the lay (Georgics 1.350)," or to recall the simple prayer offered by Propertius:



"For me it shall be enough if I am able to dance along the Via Sacra in praise of the Gods (3.4.22)."



Experience the Gods, experience yourself walking among the Gods, and then you will know that Roman spiritual reverence is not about intellectual beliefs or conformity to practice.





Di Deaeque nos semper ament, et nos vadamus in pace Deorum

M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37058 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
G. Equitius Cato A. Ambrosio Celetro quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve Celetrus, et salvete omnes.

I am sorry that I have so deeply offended you, Celetrus, over the past
eight months that I have been doing the calendar.

Just as a matter of information, please check this site:

http://www.religioromana.net/calendar/calendar-march.htm

If you note, the Compitalia falls on the 16th of March, where I
reported it in the calendar. I did not commit a "deliberate affront
to the Pontifex Maximus"; by March I'd probably forgotten that he'd
announced a Compitalia back in January and was working off the
information I had.

Also, although in the same calendar there IS a day marked
"Compitalia", it is marked for pridie Nones Ianuarius (the 4th of
January), and I did not start reporting the calendar with any
regularity until one day later, Nonis Ianuariis (the 5th of January).
Before that, Caecilius Metellus Pius and I had been kind of bouncing
back and forth, culminating in his extensive and eminently helpful
description of the basics of the calendar.

Note also, that on postridie Nones Ianuarius (the 6th of January), I
did not mention at all the Feast of the Epiphany, one of the most
important dates in the Orthodox year. So there has not been a
concerted effort on my part to "mock" the religio, nor to undermine it
by overwhelming it with the Christian year.

You wrote,

"The Liberalia, the Agonalia, the Quinquatrus, the Tubilustrium...the
list of feriae completely ignored on both this and the "official"
Religio Romana list..."

Yet every single one of them (and there have even been more than one
Agonalia, all of which I have reported) was in the calendar which I
have been posting --- I even added a link to a SOUND CLIP entitled
"Tubilustrium" by David Lovrien for that festival for the benefit of
those who have RealPlayer.

As to the post for the Vestalia on ante diem V Nones Iunius (the 9th
of June), you might have noticed that the remarks about St. Ephraeum
and Donald Duck take up less than 1/20th of the post --- it is
overwhelmingly devoted to as detailed a description of Vesta, the
Vestalia, and the Vestal Virgins as I was able to manage.

Celetrus, I have said all along that I was doing my best, learning,
trying to discover information, and also trying to keep a
light-hearted feel to the calendar. I have asked citizens repeatedly
to give me information, tell me things they'd like to have included,
anything. I have offered repeatedly to stop posting the calendar if
anyone thought I was doing a poor job in favor of someone who could do
better. But now you suddenly pounce and savage my attempt.

If you have found my postings of the calendar "totally inadequate",
you have had eight months to write to me privately or publicly and say
so. You have not. The College of Pontiffs has not. But obviously
that does not satisfy you. Therefore, starting tomorrow (it's too
late to retract today's posting, but I officially apologize for having
posted it) I will no longer post the calendar. I hope that this will
satisfy you, Celetrus, and you may take full credit for it.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37061 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: From the Archives of the Sodalis Coq et Coq
Salve Romans

From the Archives of the Sodalis Coq et Coq

Recipe: Baian Stew (Apicius 433)

Serves 4

Ingredients
20 Oysters
20 Venus Clams
40 Mussels
8 small squid cleaned and cut into thin rings
30-40g roasted pinenuts roughly chopped
2 celery stalk & tops finely chopped
1 handful fresh rue (finely chopped)
1 cup dry white wine
10 pitted dates, chopped
1 tbs. garum
1 tbs. passum
1 tbs. olive oil
pepper, coriander and cumin to taste

Soak the mollusks (not the squid) in cold salted water for a few hours to
force them to open and purge any sand inside. Change the water after
the first hour.

Place the olive oil in a large sauce pan and add all the ingredients, except
the wine, rue and passum and cook gently without burning.

After a few minutes of cooking raise the heat to full and add the drained
and rinsed mollusks and squid and stir. Then add the white wine and
allow to evaporate for a minute before adding the passum and rue.

Cover and cook on medium heat until the mollusks open and are
cooked. (about 5 minutes should be enough. Season with pepper and
serve.

You may wish to cut down on the amount of rue in this recipe and
replace it with chopped coriander leaves or flat leaf parsley.

Adapted from "A Taste of Ancient Rome" by Ilaria Gozzini Giacosa


In vino veritas

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37062 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
> so. You have not. The College of Pontiffs has not. But obviously
> that does not satisfy you. Therefore, starting tomorrow (it's too
> late to retract today's posting, but I officially apologize for
having
> posted it) I will no longer post the calendar. I hope that this will
> satisfy you, Celetrus, and you may take full credit for it.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato


Salve Cato,

Actually I vaguely recall Modius asking you to curb some comments that
metioned something about pictures and symbolism in the mainstream
religions which you greciously did but it showed someone in the CP was
keeping an eye on things.

I'll not get into religious debates but whether or not one always
agrees with you or not on various matters, I doubt that most of our
citizens will fail to realize you have done a great job over the last
8 months and never failed to produce these calander articles, even
while be busy in Rome last week. The postings look like a fair bit of
work to commit to "evey day". I'll be interested now to see how many
critics will be kicking the doors off the hinges to take over this
office duty now.

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37063 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
A. Ambrosius Celetrus G. Equitio Catoni S.P.D.

It is interesting that you would a use post addressed specifically to
Buteo Modianus,and supporting your own criticism of the CP's failure to
be "transparent" and publicly fulfill their vows to honor the Gods and
Goddesses, as an excuse to stop your calendar posts.

I guess it was overly taxing on you, copying all that information down
(sans citations). So, by all means, take this opportunity to cut and
run. My dislike for you is well known, and I am your perfect scapegoat.

It will serve a purpose if you do stop, though. It will either force a
member of the religious establishment to do what they should have been
doing all along, or it will expose them poseurs.

gaiusequitiuscato wrote:

> http://www.religioromana.net/calendar/calendar-march.htm
>
> If you note, the Compitalia falls on the 16th of March, where I
> reported it in the calendar.

If you will note, my criticism was aimed at the CP for not correcting
your error (i.e. their dereliction of duty). My suggestion that you did
it deliberately was just that - a suggestion based on my personal
dislike for you.

> Yet every single one of them (and there have even been more than one
> Agonalia, all of which I have reported) was in the calendar which I
> have been posting --- I even added a link to a SOUND CLIP entitled
> "Tubilustrium" by David Lovrien for that festival for the benefit of
> those who have RealPlayer.

Indeed you did. Again, and I made it quite clear that your posts were
the only ones mentioning the feriae, to the shame of the CP.
>
> As to the post for the Vestalia on ante diem V Nones Iunius (the 9th
> of June), you might have noticed that the remarks about St. Ephraeum
> and Donald Duck take up less than 1/20th of the post --- it is
> overwhelmingly devoted to as detailed a description of Vesta, the
> Vestalia, and the Vestal Virgins as I was able to manage.

You could have written a book about the Vestalia;, stating that June 9th
important, "last but not least" as the birthday of a Disney character,
juxtaposing a cartoon figure with Dea Vesta, was an insult - deliberate
or not.

> Celetrus, I have said all along that I was doing my best, learning,
> trying to discover information, and also trying to keep a
> light-hearted feel to the calendar.

And you've done a wonderful job, for the most part. Again, my post was
aimed at the shameful failure of Nova Roma's religious established to do
what they have vowed to do - promote the Religio publicly.

> If you have found my postings of the calendar "totally inadequate",
> you have had eight months to write to me privately or publicly and say
> so. You have not.

My exact quote was "Cato's write up was nice enough, but totally
inadequate." And from a practitioners point of view, it was. Again, the
post you are using to stop your calendar was addressed to Buteo
Modianus.

> The College of Pontiffs has not.

To their shame.

> But obviously
> that does not satisfy you. Therefore, starting tomorrow... I will no longer post the > calendar.

You will do what you feel you must, blame me if you must, but you will
stop because you want to. My post to Buteo has evidently been just what
you've been waiting for.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37066 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: THE HOUSE OF JULIUS POLYBIUS
Salve Romans


I have just watched an amazing 10 and 1/2 min. film on the THE HOUSE OF JULIUS POLYBIUS


"Pompeii has come to life again thanks to 3D visual restoration. Among the most impressive residences found beneath the volcanic ash in Pompeii is the home of Julius Polybius, identified from an inscription on the wall. In this virtual-reality film, the spectator is led to discover the many rooms of that palatial house in full detail, including the exact position of everyday objects precisely as they were found minutes before the explosion of the volcano in AD 79."



Its from http://www.archaeologychannel.org/<http://www.archaeologychannel.org/>



This is a must see!



Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37068 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
G. Equitius Cato A. Ambrosio Celetro quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve Celetrus et salvete omnes.

Ah. Believe it or not, I'd actually forgotten that you disliked me so
personally and intensely, or I might have read your speech outlining
my deficiencies (whether addressed specifically to Buteo or myself is
of little consequence, as you know perfectly well) with a large amount
of salt. You were furious with me for speaking about the Faith of
your own ancestors which you abandoned; you now speak poisonously, and
claim to be the voice of the religio. Who knows? Maybe in the future
you will abandon the religio as well, and speak of the practitioners
you leave behind with equal venom.

No, Celetrus, you will not get rid of me so easily. I will continue
the calendar because I like doing it. I will probably miss a day here
and there --- and I may even make some mistakes --- in the future.
But I am learning, and enjoying myself. You, Celetrus, can sit on
your pillar of bile and continue to do nothing for the res publica.
It is certainly high enough to allow you to look down on everyone else.

I apologize to the quirites of the res publica for losing my temper
and making such a rash and impetuous announcement based on emotion
rather than intellect.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37071 From: Marcus Iulius Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Inoltra: [conventus2758] Some pics from the Conventus
Nota: allegato messaggio inoltrato.


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37072 From: Lucius Modius Kaelus Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
Salve, Celetrus.

Actually, it was a practitioner who first suggested a joint effort
with Cato to post the calendar, with the intent of informing all
citizens about events and feasts of the religio publica. I know Cato
was very enthusiastic about this prospect. And I happen to know this
because I was that practitioner. I initially posted the first few days
of the calendar, and then after a short (and necessary) absense of
mine, Cato resumed the duties with far more vigour than I had.

When I returned Cato asked if I wanted to continue doing the calendar,
but I acquiesced to his dutiful posting and skillfull writing. The few
times that I posted calendar entries, I only included historical
blurbs related to the feast days and a description of the festivities.

Cato instead included relevant historical dates on all matters of
history, including important dates related to military events, etc. He
continued to post a discription of the feasts, and even included a
description of the Immortal(s) so honoured, something I never would
have thought of, [wrongly] assuming familiarity among the entire
populace. He has the format down clockwork precision, and writes in a
beautiful style. And to my knowledge, he's never missed an entry. He's
done an amazing service to the republic, and it should be so honoured,
and continued.

Historically this was the duty of the Comitia Calata (announced by the
Collegium Pontificum). Cato, however, makes it relevant to all of the
citizens of the populace, not just the religio practitioners. I am not
ordained a priest in Nova Roma, but if Cato wishes to enlist my help
again, all he needs do is ask since I've returned.

Vale,
Kaelus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37073 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Well, Aulus Ambrosius Celetrus, you sure have an opinion of me. Of which
you are surely entitled to.

I would very much like to see the Collegium Pontificum do more. This has
been brought up within the Collegium Pontificum several times. There are
several pontifices, of which I am both one and one of the newest of them. Pomona
does not have a specific festival date (a Pomonalia if you will). I attempt
to honor Pomona the best I can, and as often as I can in a public venue.
Sorry this is not good enough to your liking.

I choose to be active on this list, and I also choose to be active as a
"self styled" Pagan man. However, I am but one member of the Collegium
Pontificum. I cannot shoulder the whole burden of responsibility of the Collegium
Pontificum upon myself, this is not possible.

The Collegium Pontificum is chaired by Marcus Cassius Julianus, a senator, a
consular, and the founder of Nova Roma. There are several pontifices who
are senators, and consulars. I am but one of a several person Collegium. I
will not shoulder the burden of the several "failures" of the Collegium.

I am deeply dissatisfied with the way the Religio is administered within
Nova Roma. But I am only one pontifex, it takes a whole Collegium. I believe
your criticism of me is unjustified, and rather rude. But so be it. This is
not the first time you have been hyper critical of me, it is something I have
come to associate with you name.

Valete;

C. Fabius Buteo Modianus

In a message dated 8/13/2005 10:30:05 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
Aulus.Ambrosius.Celetrus@... writes:

No Buteo, you don't - not unless you feel your priestly prerogatives are
threatened by anyone here in Nova Roma, or you have a chance at a photo
op.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37074 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
C. Fabius Buteo Modianus Quinto Lanio Paulino salutem dicit

I was somewhat critical of the mention of Gnosticism and the role/nature of
Mary Magdalene. I disagreed with the conclusion that Cato set forth in his
daily calendar posting (and I don't want it re-hashed again please :) . I
suggested he limit his posting to the Classical world. Consensus went contrary
to my opinion, so be it. I can take criticism, and disagreement. I am not,
nor was I, making any sort of official request... but a personal one. I am
sure Cato would have complied if consensus facilitated a change, but it did
not.

But Censor Marinus and I have been making sure that the calendar posting of
Cato have been posted the Nova Roma livejournal:
_http://www.livejournal.com/community/novaroma/_ (http://www.livejournal.com/community/novaroma/)

I have been looking over the postings. Not religiously (no pun intended),
but I have been looking them over.

People seem to like the postings. I see no reason to stop them simply
because of criticism by one person. I closed down the original PeaceNR list
because of the criticism by Cato back in the earlier part of this year. I too a
reactionary stance, and in retrospect I probably should have kept the list
around -- as others have said they saw benefit in it.

The problem with e-mail is that when a person received criticism from one
person, they -- sometimes -- think that everyone feels this way. This is not
usually the case.

Valete;

C. Fabius Buteo Modianus

In a message dated 8/13/2005 12:13:10 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
mjk@... writes:

Salve Cato,

Actually I vaguely recall Modius asking you to curb some comments that
metioned something about pictures and symbolism in the mainstream
religions which you greciously did but it showed someone in the CP was
keeping an eye on things.

I'll not get into religious debates but whether or not one always
agrees with you or not on various matters, I doubt that most of our
citizens will fail to realize you have done a great job over the last
8 months and never failed to produce these calander articles, even
while be busy in Rome last week. The postings look like a fair bit of
work to commit to "evey day". I'll be interested now to see how many
critics will be kicking the doors off the hinges to take over this
office duty now.

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37075 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Roman spirituality
SALVE MARCE HORATI !

And when I was to the Via Sacra, I have said a prayer for you, my friend.

OPTIME VALE,
IVL SABINVS

Marcus Horatius <mhoratius@...> wrote:
Salvete Quirites, comreligiones et Novae Romani omnes

"For me it shall be enough if I am able to dance along the Via Sacra in praise of the Gods (3.4.22)."



Experience the Gods, experience yourself walking among the Gods, and then you will know that Roman spiritual reverence is not about intellectual beliefs or conformity to practice.





Di Deaeque nos semper ament, et nos vadamus in pace Deorum

M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------






"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37076 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Inoltra: [conventus2758] Some pics from the Conventus
SALVE !

Where are they ? I can't see any pics !

VALE,
IVL SABINVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Marcus Iulius <m_iulius@y...> wrote:
>
>
> Nota: allegato messaggio inoltrato.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37077 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: the last day of the conventus
SALVE PERUSIANE AMICE !

It was very nice to meet you. You are a very friendly man and that it
wasn't a surprise for me.
Thanks for all. I will be ready with my message about Conventus in a
few days and of course with a photos web page, as usualy.

OPTIME VALE,
IVL SABINVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Marcus Iulius Perusianus"
<m_iulius@y...> wrote:
> ave Cato omnesque,
>
> ...and back among the crowded streets of this Forum. Yes, have I
> told you amice? I share your vision of this ML ;-)
>
> > It would be almost impossible (but not quite, which is why I'm
> writing
> > this) to describe what an incredible job Provincia Italia --- and
> > specifically Serapio --- did at this Conventus.
>
> I'll say once for all, as Serapio could abandon his republican
forma
> mentis dreaming imperial laurels ;-) thanks Propraetor for the
> effort you made these days. :-))
>
> and thank you all for having being here these days and shared some
> wonderful moments. After all, I'm sure, it was a great success.
>
> A special hug to Astur, Sabinus and the people who I had the
> pleasure to show the Caffarella Valley. A great kiss to the people
> who climbed the Marcian+Tepula+Iulia acqueduct with me ;-) yes,
> friends, that was the name and the other one with the great arches
> was the aqua Claudia+Anio Novus... just for the records, eh eh
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37078 From: Appia Claudia Laterana Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: In favour of Cato's Calendar.
Salvete omnes!

Salve Cato!

The Calendar of Cato is a exemplum of the ideal of the doctus orator style for me. In his small texts, I see varietas, tractus, lenitas et aequabilitas. We can see dedicatio in it. And dedicatio is sacred. The gods and historical persons and references are alive in your Calendar, so are alive in our life. "Vita enim mortuorum in memoria est posita uiuorum", wrote Cicero. The Fasti are a gift for us. Ave Cato! Don't leave us! We miss you!

Valete bene!

Appia Claudia Laterana.






__________________________________________________
Converse com seus amigos em tempo real com o Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.download.yahoo.com/messenger/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37079 From: Flavia Scholastica Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Inoltra: [conventus2758] Some pics from the Conventus
Salve, Tite Iuli Sabine, et salvete, omnes!

SALVE !
>
> Where are they ? I can't see any pics !

Well, I can't read the Italian below, but if it says that there were
pictures attached, rest assured that Yahoo has removed them and sent them to
the great cybernetic trash can. All attachments are removed to prevent
virus infection.
>
> VALE,
> IVL SABINVS

Vale, et valete,

A. Tullia Scholastica

>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Marcus Iulius <m_iulius@y...> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Nota: allegato messaggio inoltrato.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37080 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Inoltra: [conventus2758] Some pics from the Conventus
SALVE FLAVIA SCHOLASTICA !

Yes, I belive you have right. Thank you.

OPTIME VALE,
IVL SABINVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Flavia Scholastica <fororom@l...>
wrote:
> Salve, Tite Iuli Sabine, et salvete, omnes!
>
> SALVE !
> >
> > Where are they ? I can't see any pics !
>
> Well, I can't read the Italian below, but if it says that there
were
> pictures attached, rest assured that Yahoo has removed them and
sent them to
> the great cybernetic trash can. All attachments are removed to
prevent
> virus infection.
> >
> > VALE,
> > IVL SABINVS
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Marcus Iulius <m_iulius@y...>
wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Nota: allegato messaggio inoltrato.
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------
> >> Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3
> >>
> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37081 From: Manius Constantinus Serapio Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Conventus Novae Romae
AVETE OMNES

I am sorry that I have not enough time now to write in detail about
the Conventus, myself being leaving in a few hours. Still I would
like to thank all those who attented this meeting, the largest
meeting of Nova Roma citizens since the birth of our Republic.
Many things have been improved after the last years and new problems
have arisen with the new size of this rally: surely the Conventus
will keep improve year after year, thanks to the experience of past
editions.
What I would like to say is that for me it has been great to meet so
many citizens. I'm sure that now our group is stronger. You can't
imagine how useful such meetings are to strengthen Nova Roma.
Now when I'll be sending you an e-mail I'll see your face :-)
You all are very nice guys! ;-)

I'll write more in about ten days, when I'll be back home.

Thank you very much

OPTIME VALETE
M'Con.Serapio
Propraetor Italiae
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37082 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
--- Salve Caius Minucius Scaevola et Salvete Omnes:

You wrote to Cato:
>
> I'm very glad that you have reconsidered, amice; I receive great
> pleasure from your calendar posts, as - I'm sure - do many others
here.
> To lose them due to random flames would be... disheartening.

To which Pompeia replies: Hear, hear frater.... you have expressed
my thoughts also.

I too enjoy the calendar, and applaud the efforts of G. Equitius Cato
in its publication.

Valete bene,
Po
>
>
> Optime vale, et valete -
> Caius Minucius Scaevola
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Finis coronat opus.
> The ending crowns the work.
> -- N/A. Cf. "exitus acta probat".
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37083 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Contio: Lex Popillia Senatoria
C. Fabius Buteo Modianus G. Popillio Laeno salutem dicit

After reviewing the Lex Popillia Senatoria, and thinking about it for some
weeks I believe that this Lex is a good thing for Nova Roma. I support this
Lex, and shall advocate for its approval by the citizens of Nova Roma.

Vale;

C. Fabius Buteo Modianus

In a message dated 7/26/2005 12:07:18 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
gaiuspopillius@... writes:

Gaius Popillius Laenas Consul Quiritibus Salutem Plurimam Dicit.

I open contio on the following proposed Lex Popillia Senatoria. I
realize that there are several items being debated currently in the
Forum, and I hesitate to add to them. However, I also see the
calendar becoming quite crowded in the coming weeks and I have
promised to allow plenty of time for discussion of this proposal.

Accordingly, this contio will be open ended. I will call for the
Comitia Tributa Populi when, and if, it seems appropriate
(including, of course, the proper auspices).

Valete.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37084 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Contio: Lex Popillia Senatoria
> After reviewing the Lex Popillia Senatoria, and thinking about it for some
> weeks I believe that this Lex is a good thing for Nova Roma. I support this
> Lex, and shall advocate for its approval by the citizens of Nova Roma.

I certainly agree... I'd just like to see it go to the People as soon
as possible!

Valete,

Q. Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37085 From: Stefanie Beer Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] The Calendar
Salve Cato!
Please keep posting the calendar! It´s one of the things I look forward to
every day! Always full of information and written in a wonderful style - I´m
almost addicted to it!
Tu valeas!
Lucia Flavia Lectrix

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37086 From: Judy Ridgley Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: The Calendar (WAS Re:
Salve Cato
RE The calendar issue
I have to say as a newbe with NR, I wish you would keep posting the calendar because I enjoy this immensely. I don't understand all the other listings because it is way over my head. I love Rome. I love the uniqueness of Rome. I love the history, its culture, its calendar. So Please don't stop the one thing I can follow and enjoy...so far.

Iullia Galeria
----- Original Message -----
From: raymond fuentes
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] The Calendar (WAS Re:


Cato,the calender is one if not the only good thing
about the ML. If you dont post it then I have
definately have had my fill of the wretched Main List.
TACET
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato A. Ambrosio Celetro quiritibusque
S.P.D.
>
> Salve Celetrus, et salvete omnes.
>
> I am sorry that I have so deeply offended you,
Celetrus, over the past
> eight months that I have been doing the calendar.
>
> Just as a matter of information, please check this
site:
>
>
http://www.religioromana.net/calendar/calendar-march.htm
>
> If you note, the Compitalia falls on the 16th of
March, where I
> reported it in the calendar. I did not commit a
"deliberate affront
> to the Pontifex Maximus"; by March I'd probably
forgotten that he'd
> announced a Compitalia back in January and was
working off the
> information I had.
>
> Also, although in the same calendar there IS a day
marked
> "Compitalia", it is marked for pridie Nones
Ianuarius (the 4th of
> January), and I did not start reporting the calendar
with any
> regularity until one day later, Nonis Ianuariis (the
5th of January).
> Before that, Caecilius Metellus Pius and I had been
kind of bouncing
> back and forth, culminating in his extensive and
eminently helpful
> description of the basics of the calendar.
>
> Note also, that on postridie Nones Ianuarius (the
6th of January), I
> did not mention at all the Feast of the Epiphany,
one of the most
> important dates in the Orthodox year. So there has
not been a
> concerted effort on my part to "mock" the religio,
nor to undermine it
> by overwhelming it with the Christian year.
>
> You wrote,
>
> "The Liberalia, the Agonalia, the Quinquatrus, the
Tubilustrium...the
> list of feriae completely ignored on both this and
the "official"
> Religio Romana list..."
>
> Yet every single one of them (and there have even
been more than one
> Agonalia, all of which I have reported) was in the
calendar which I
> have been posting --- I even added a link to a SOUND
CLIP entitled
> "Tubilustrium" by David Lovrien for that festival
for the benefit of
> those who have RealPlayer.
>
> As to the post for the Vestalia on ante diem V Nones
Iunius (the 9th
> of June), you might have noticed that the remarks
about St. Ephraeum
> and Donald Duck take up less than 1/20th of the post
--- it is
> overwhelmingly devoted to as detailed a description
of Vesta, the
> Vestalia, and the Vestal Virgins as I was able to
manage.
>
> Celetrus, I have said all along that I was doing my
best, learning,
> trying to discover information, and also trying to
keep a
> light-hearted feel to the calendar. I have asked
citizens repeatedly
> to give me information, tell me things they'd like
to have included,
> anything. I have offered repeatedly to stop posting
the calendar if
> anyone thought I was doing a poor job in favor of
someone who could do
> better. But now you suddenly pounce and savage my
attempt.
>
> If you have found my postings of the calendar
"totally inadequate",
> you have had eight months to write to me privately
or publicly and say
> so. You have not. The College of Pontiffs has not.
But obviously
> that does not satisfy you. Therefore, starting
tomorrow (it's too
> late to retract today's posting, but I officially
apologize for having
> posted it) I will no longer post the calendar. I
hope that this will
> satisfy you, Celetrus, and you may take full credit
for it.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37088 From: Judy Ridgley Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: Iuro
Congratulations Salvia and best wishes.
Iullia Galeria
----- Original Message -----
From: Sempronia Graccha
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com ; AMS_NR@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 4:16 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Iuro


Salvete Omnes!
I, Alison Tomkins (Salvia Sempronia Graccha Volentia), do hereby solemnly
swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best
interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.
As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Alison Tomkins (Salvia Sempronia Graccha
Volentia), swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public
dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.
I swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of
Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status
as the State Religion.
I, Alison Tomkins (Salvia Sempronia Graccha Volentia), swear to protect
and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma. I further swear to fulfill the
obligations and responsibilities of the office of propraetrix of Provincia
America Medioccidentalis Superior to the best of my abilities.
On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods
and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept
the position of propraetrix and all the rights, privileges, obligations,
and responsibilities attendant thereto.
Ego, Salvia Sempronia Graccha Volentia, hac re ipsa decus Novae Romae me
defensuram, et semper pro populo senatuque Novae Romae acturam esse
sollemniter IVRO.
Ego, Salvia Sempronia Graccha Volentia, officio propraetricis Provinciae
America Medioccidentalis Superior Novae Romae accepto, deos deasque Romae
in omnibus meae vitae publicae temporibus culturum, et virtutes Romanas
publica privataque vita me persecuturam esse IVRO. Ego, Salvia Sempronia
Graccha Volentia, Religioni Romanae me fauturam et eam defensuram, et
numquam contra eius statum publicum me acturam esse, ne quid detrimenti
capiat IVRO.
Ego,Salvia Sempronia Graccha Volentia, officiis muneris propraetricis AMS
me quam optime functuram esse praeterea IVRO.
Meo civis Novae Romae honore, coram deis deabusque populi Romani, et
voluntate favoreque eorum, ego munus propraetricis AMS una cum iuribus,
privilegiis, muneribus et officiis comitantibus ACCIPIO.

Valete, et habitetis in luce deorum!
Salvia Sempronia Graccha Volentia





____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37089 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
C. Fabius Buteo Modianus Marcae Hortensiae salutem dicit

This is very good to know, thank you. It is a good thing for all the
supporters of the Religio to work together. Lets work on creating something
positive, and TRY (myself included) to work towards harmony and peace. Humility is
probably the most difficult virtue for all of us, myself included.

Vale;

C. Fabius Buteo Modianus

In a message dated 8/12/2005 3:45:29 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
rory12001@... writes:

M. Hortensia Maior G. Buteo Modiano Modio Kaelo spd;
Salvete; first I would like to sincerely thank Pontifex
Gaius Buteo Modianus for his support in the past and now. I also wish
to thank Modius Kaelus for his apology.

It is a great thing if all supporters of the Religio work together. I
certainly vow to do my best and support the Collegium Pontificium and
all Nova Roma's pontiffs, priests and augurs.
bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37090 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION
In a message dated 8/13/2005 2:06:44 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
mlcinnyc@... writes:
Maximus, if you felt it was so important that the junor consul attend,
why did you not suggest the subsidization you mention before the
Conventus began? The date of the Conventus did not simply spring
forth full-blown like Minerva from Iuppiter's head and surprise
everyone. Or you could have offered to subsidize him yourself. Did
you discuss this with the junior consul? Did you ask if there might
have been another, macronational, reason why he was unable to attend?
Has he expressed some kind of bitterness (as opposed to regret) that
he was not there?
Well, hey I'm sorry, I don't get your sense of humor. Calvus is astute, I've
worked with him before, and usually he has a pretty good nose detecting
trouble and for reading between the lines.


And why yes, Maximus, I felt very good at the Conventus, and if you
have a problem with that I have no answer for you.
Not at all. I'm glad you enjoyed yourself.
What you have dismissed as a "feel good exercize" is at the very heart and
soul of
the res publica: groups of its citizens meeting, eating, drinking, and
talking together face to face in the macronational world.
Exactly. But when did the conversation turn to, "What's wrong with Republic
and how can we fix it?" I know it did, we have had the same discussions at
early Roman Days.


The phrase you use, "with no one from Europe attending", has its
reverse: "with no one from the U.S. attending", and that is simply not
true, because I am from the U.S. and by gum, I was there. I did not
claim to represent the entire U.S., nor did any other attendee claim
representative power for their respective macronational country.

Must be nice you can drop what you are doing and jet out to Rome. Most of
the American NR citizens do not have this luxery. Either they can not afford
it, or they can't take time.
Either way your presence was fortunate.

It is a pity that something that engendered so much interest and
humour and energy should be dismissed so tritely and unthinkingly.
Oh geez. Grow up will you! You just keep rubbing it in. Make your report
to the Senate on what went on and be done with it.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37091 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
In a message dated 8/13/2005 8:26:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
mlcinnyc@... writes:
If you have found my postings of the calendar "totally inadequate",
you have had eight months to write to me privately or publicly and say
so. You have not. The College of Pontiffs has not. But obviously
that does not satisfy you. Therefore, starting tomorrow (it's too
late to retract today's posting, but I officially apologize for having
posted it) I will no longer post the calendar. I hope that this will
satisfy you, Celetrus, and you may take full credit for it.
For the Gods' sake. Equitius Cato, you know I applaud your efforts at the
daily Calendar that was started by Iulis and continued by you. Actually an
earlier verson was started by Pontiff Gryllius but that was before both your time.

As any good Roman knows Silence indicates Consent. If the college felt that
Cato was working not for the good of the Religio, we would let him know it.

I remember an earlier Nova Roma where everybody just did their job, and no
one expected props for doing so. Perhaps one day we shall return to that.
Anyway from me at least, thank you Cato for your efforts. You have increased
the knowledge of the average citizen, and all should appreciate it. I'm
sorry you will discontinue
the Calendar. Perhaps someone else will finish it out.

Q. Fabius Maximus
Q


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37092 From: Lucius Modius Kaelus Date: 2005-08-13
Subject: Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis"
Maior, I've decided to once again hold out an olive branch to you in
the spirt of your post.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adfines/
As soon as you join this group, I will give you joint moderatorship
with Buteo Modianus, in the hope the all three of us can work together
to make this project a success.

Vale bene,
Kaelus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> M. Hortensia Maior G. Buteo Modiano Modio Kaelo spd;
> Salvete; first I would like to sincerely thank Pontifex
> Gaius Buteo Modianus for his support in the past and now. I also wish
> to thank Modius Kaelus for his apology.
>
> It is a great thing if all supporters of the Religio work together. I
> certainly vow to do my best and support the Collegium Pontificium and
> all Nova Roma's pontiffs, priests and augurs.
> bene valete in pacem deorum
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
> > So I therefore extend a sincere apology to Hortensia Maior.
> >
> >
> > Vale et valete,
> > Kaelus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37094 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2005-08-14
Subject: [conventus2758] Some pics from the Conventus:let's try again
Avete Sabine amice omnesque,

I'd like to share some pics from the last day of the Conventus:

see at
http://it.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/m_iulius/album?.dir=/fc46&.src=ph

117: NovaRomans off the sacred wood of Nymph Egeria, whist the shape
of Volcano Latialis is i the background

120: stop talking about politics, we're approching the great
acqueduct of Appius Claudius

161: NovaRomans: too tired...the Tomb of Cecilia Metella can wait
half an hour ;-)

128: Cato leads the group on the Appian Way, carefully cheking the
flagstones ;-)

135: <<Am I or not the Sr Consul?>>

090: paying respect to the temple of Deus Redicolus (God of Good
Return) ...for a new come to Rome soon.. I know, I know...this is
Annia Regilla Sepulcher..... eh eh

more to come...

valete
M IVL PERVSIANVS


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Marcus Iulius <m_iulius@y...>
wrote:
>
>
> Nota: allegato messaggio inoltrato.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37095 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-14
Subject: Re: [conventus2758] Some pics from the Conventus:let's try again
Salve Marce Iuli, et salvete omnes,

Marcus Iulius Perusianus wrote:

> I'd like to share some pics from the last day of the Conventus:

> http://it.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/m_iulius/album?.dir=/fc46&.src=ph

Thank you. Most enjoyable.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37096 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-08-14
Subject: Re: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] The Calendar
Salve Cato,

you have already taken the (good) decision to keep on posting the Calendar. I would like
to express here all the consideration I give to your work. After I read the Calendar, I
always feel more Roman.

Vale,

Sextus Apollonius Scipio
Propraetor Galliae

--- Stefanie Beer <sbeer@...> wrote:

> Salve Cato!
> Please keep posting the calendar! It´s one of the things I look forward to
> every day! Always full of information and written in a wonderful style - I´m
> almost addicted to it!
> Tu valeas!
> Lucia Flavia Lectrix
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37097 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-14
Subject: Latin
Salve Romans

Here is some information for anyone interested in learning Latin on you own or bringing
it to you local school that does not have a Latin teacher on staff.


http://www.cambridgescp.com/main.php<http://www.cambridgescp.com/main.php>


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37098 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-08-14
Subject: Re: Latin
Salve Tiberi Galeri Pauline!

Very useful indeed - thank you!

Sextus Pilatus Barbatus



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Timothy P. Gallagher
Sent: 14 August 2005 16:25
To: Nova-Roma
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Latin



Salve Romans

Here is some information for anyone interested in learning Latin on you own
or bringing
it to you local school that does not have a Latin teacher on staff.


http://www.cambridgescp.com/main.php<http://www.cambridgescp.com/main.php>


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37099 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-14
Subject: David Meadows Explorator 8.16 August 14, 2005
Salve Romans

FYI

From David Meadows Explorator 8.16 August 14, 2005

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

===============================================================
ANCIENT GREECE AND ROME (AND CLASSICS)
===============================================================
Paleo-, meso-, and neolithic remains from the Pindus mountains:

http://tinyurl.com/cfbeu<http://tinyurl.com/cfbeu> (Kathimerini)

They're dismantling one of those Thracian tombs to prevent
looting therein:

http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=51157<http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=51157>

Bulgarian astronomers are checking out the tombs too:

http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=50949<http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=50949>

Bulgarian archaeologists also found a labrys ... no mention
of Minoans in this one, though:

http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=51018<http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=51018>

A large coin hoard was found in the heart of Athens:

http://sify.com/news/fullstory.php?id=13915895<http://sify.com/news/fullstory.php?id=13915895>
http://tinyurl.com/bbjer<http://tinyurl.com/bbjer> (AFP via Yahoo ... photos)

Brief item on Roman and Byzantine remains from Polis Chrysochous:

http://www.financialmirror.com/more_news.php?id=1668<http://www.financialmirror.com/more_news.php?id=1668>

A Roman graveyard has been found in Austria (hopefully we'll
hear more about this one):

http://www.chinapost.com.tw/i_latestdetail.asp?id=29859<http://www.chinapost.com.tw/i_latestdetail.asp?id=29859>
http://tinyurl.com/dn4wa<http://tinyurl.com/dn4wa> (JPost)

Italian archaeologists continue to search off the coast of
Sicily for the site of the battle of the Aegates Islands:

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8925262/<http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8925262/>
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050812/sc_nm/italy_archaeology_dc<http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050812/sc_nm/italy_archaeology_dc>
http://tinyurl.com/b8uyw<http://tinyurl.com/b8uyw> (Reuters)


Nice followup/more detailed story about the source of
bricks for many of Rome's more famous monuments:

http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20050808/brickmakers.html<http://dscdiscovery.com/news/briefs/20050808/brickmakers.html>

A stretch of Roman road in the UK was dug up by mistake:

http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/44543.html<http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/44543.html>
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=1749172005<http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=1749172005>
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,171-1727012,00.html<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,171-1727012,00.html>

Roman remains in Beirut (article in Arabic ... with photos):

http://www.annaharonline.com/htd/BEAA050813.HTM<http://www.annaharonline.com/htd/BEAA050813.HTM>

A Roman temple has been found on Pantelleria:

http://tinyurl.com/cd9oo<http://tinyurl.com/cd9oo> (ANSA)

Roman remains found in Marsa (Malta) will remain covered:

http://www.timesofmalta.com/core/article.php?id=195800<http://www.timesofmalta.com/core/article.php?id=195800>

On the environmental damage caused by the Greeks and Romans:

http://tinyurl.com/dmmur<http://tinyurl.com/dmmur> (Mother Earth)

The Archaeology Channel is featuring a video with nice vr
work on the House of Julius Polybius from Pompeii:

http://www.archaeologychannel.org/<http://www.archaeologychannel.org/>

Mary Beard reviews a trio of books about travelling in Greece:

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n16/bear01_.html<http://www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n16/bear01_.html>

Recent reviews from BMCR:

http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/recent.html<http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/recent.html>

Recent reviews from Scholia:

http://www.classics.und.ac.za/reviews/2006.htm<http://www.classics.und.acza/reviews/2006.htm>

All those tourists are damaging Hadrian's Wall:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1727016,00.html<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1727016,00.html>
http://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/viewarticle.aspx?id=271513<http://wwwnewsandstar.co.uk/news/viewarticle.aspx?id=271513>

Latin Scrabble:

http://63.247.138.2/~curculio/index.php?cat=95<http://63.247.138.2/~curculio/index.php?cat=95>

More coverage of Marc-André Gutscher's theory about Atlantis
(which isn't really Atlantis):

http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20050808/atlantis.html<http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20050808/atlantis.html>
http://tinyurl.com/96wbo<http://tinyurl.com/96wbo> (NIS)

NJCL Convention coverage:

http://tinyurl.com/dv9tw<http://tinyurl.com/dv9tw> (News Tribune)

More hype for HBO's Rome:

http://www.canmag.com/news/4/21/1730<http://www.canmag.com/news/4/21/1730>
================================================================
EUROPE AND THE UK (+ Ireland)
================================================================
This seems to be a repeat of that 'Stone Age Adonis' story
from a while back (not sure why CNN/Netscape things aren't
dated):

http://tinyurl.com/bb4db<http://tinyurl.com/bb4db>

A prehistoric canoe from Italy:

http://tinyurl.com/dxotg<http://tinyurl.com/dxotg> (ANSA)

Remains of Neolithic Marseilles:

http://tinyurl.com/c67z7<http://tinyurl.com/c67z7> (IOL)

A brief/vague item on the discovery of a 2800 b.p. skeleton
in Zagreb:

http://tinyurl.com/drlz3<http://tinyurl.com/drlz3> (IOL)

A medieval cemetery on the cliffs of Pembrokeshire:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/south_west/4134296.stm<http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/south_west/4134296.stm>

They're digging around Finland's Turku Cathedral:

http://tinyurl.com/asu95<http://tinyurl.com/asu95> (STT)

Remains of a 300 b.p. murder victim (?) from Scotland:

http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=1751882005<http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=1751882005>

Medieval wine cellars from Georgia (is Georgia considered
in Europe or Asia??):

http://en.rian.ru/science/20050811/41139963.html<http://en.rian.ru/science/20050811/41139963.html>

Repeat of that medical-knowledge-of-medieval-monks story:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3745498.stm<http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3745498.stm>
================================================================
ASIA AND THE SOUTH PACIFIC
================================================================
They've found archaeological evidence that the Buddha visited
Orissa:

http://www.eians.com/stories/2005/08/07/07the.shtml<http://www.eians.com/stories/2005/08/07/07the.shtml>

A laser light show will recreate the Bamiyan Buddhas:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/arts/4134252.stm<http://news.bbcco.uk/1/hi/entertainment/arts/4134252.stm>
http://tinyurl.com/d2w7s<http://tinyurl.com/d2w7s> (Telegraph)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050808/ap_on_sc/laser_buddhas<http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050808/ap_on_sc/laser_buddhas>

Another 600 b.p. Chinese ship ... this time, from China's
Shandong Province:

http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v3/news_lite.php?id=149815<http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v3/news_lite.php?id=149815>
http://english.people.com.cn/200508/12/eng20050812_202015.html<http://english.people.com.cn/200508/12/eng20050812_202015.html>

New Zealand Archaeology eNews:

http://www.nzarchaeology.org/netsubnews.htm<http://www.nzarchaeology.org/netsubnews.htm>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37100 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-14
Subject: From David Meadows Explorator 8.16 August 14, 2005
Salve Romans

I forgot to include this notice on my last post

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

================================================================
Explorator is Copyright (c) 2005 David Meadows. Feel free to
distribute these listings via email to your pals, students,
teachers, etc., but please include this copyright notice. These
links are not to be posted to any website by any means (whether
by direct posting or snagging from a usenet group or some other
email source) without my express written permission. I think it
is only right that I be made aware of public fora which are
making use of content gathered in Explorator. Thanks!
================================================================

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37101 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-14
Subject: From the Archives of the Sodalis Coq et Coq 3
Salve Romans From the Archives of the Sodalis Coq et Coq
Recipe: Baked Red Mullet in a Fennel a

Ingredients

3 to 4lb Red Mullet

Sauce
(All herbs must be fresh)
Sprig of fresh rosemary
1 teaspoon fresh mint
1/2 teaspoon coriander
Sprig of fennel top or dill
Ground black pepper
Sprig of lovage
2 teaspoons honey
1 cup of fish stock
drizzle of olive oil
3 tablespoons white wine

Place the mullet in a paper "cartoccio" with olive oil, salt, pepper, white
wine and a sprig of rosemary.

Close the parcel and bake for 30 to 40 minutes or until cooked.

In a mortar grind together the herbs (or finely chop) and combine with
the other ingredients. Simmer for 25 minutes to reduce.

Pour over baked mullet and serve.

"The above recipe is taken from "The Roman Cookery of Apicius" by John
Edwards and has been adapted according to my own experiments." In vino veritas Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37103 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana S. Pilato Barbato, G. Equitio Catoni
omnibusque SPD.

I second the sentiments expressed by Pilatus Barbatus.

Through all the negative bedlam that has transpired on this
ML, the Calendar posts are one of the few things that keep
me going. I figure, if NR includes even a few people who
*demonstrate* (not talk about) enthusiasm, openness and
dedication the way Cato does, there must be a reason to keep
struggling for those same "virtues" in Nova Roma as a whole.

Yes, sometimes the posts include fluffy bits. They haven't
all been to my taste, but I enjoy most of them as a study in
comparative cultures. So Cato has a sense of humor? Last
time I looked, "comitas" was still on the list of Roman virtues,
and right near the top, to boot.

Time to post this thought too: In traditional Japanese society
(I lived there for 13 years, and alas, this is not so true today),
it was believed that "Whereever you go, you represent your family."

In this case, that family is NR. And when anyone pours flames
and vituperation, or unsupported invective on the e-pages, that
is what they represent NR as being.

The standard Oath of Office says:
"I, --------, do hereby solemnly swear to uphold the honor of
Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests of the people
and the Senate of Nova Roma.

I, --------, swear to honor the Gods and Godesses of Rome in
my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman virtues in my
public and private life."

Those principles really apply to all of us.

Valete bene in pace Deorum.

G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Bird" <p.bird@n...> wrote:
> Cato -
>
> Do NOT stop posting the calendar! I look forward to it every
day and learn an awful lot from it. Please don't let one citizen's
private gripe stop you from giving pleasure and interest to
hundreds of others!
>
> Audi me!
>
> Sextus Pilatus Barbatus
>
> PS and perhaps we'll soon have a stupendous argument over the
filioque!!!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37104 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Redivimus
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

Well, Livia and I are now back from Rome and Ireland.
As those who were there know and those who read this
forum have already been told many times, the conventus
was fantastic. We were both very sad to have to leave,
and we hope to see everyone again sooner or later.
Many thanks to Serapio and all the other organizers
for their Herculean efforts.



___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37105 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: ave
A. Apollonius Jeppo Scurrae omnibusque sal.

> ego sum Jeppus Scurra, hodie eo in ista condicione
> causa loquendi
> dispiputandique vobiscum
> spero vos auxiliare me

Salve, Scurra. Spero ut apud nos feliciter maneas. De
qua re disputare vis?

Ut dixit A. Tullia, Anglice in hoc foro loqui solemus,
sed Latine loqui quoque libenter possumus.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37106 From: Lucia Cassia Silvana Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: The Calendar (WAS Re: "Sodalitas Diis Inferis")
Salve Cato,
As you know, I love the daily calendar. It is what brings me here
every day. I often am inspired to look up more information on the
festivals, gods/goddesses, saints, and historical events that you
inform us about. I also often share what you have posted with my
friends who are not part of NR, and they too enjoy it.

Those little extras that don't quite fit in with Roman history, well, I
see it this way - I'm still part of the non-Roman world outside of this
list. Those little extras remind me of that and when I go out into
that non-Roman world (to work, to school, to the gym) and someone
mentions, for example, that it's Donald Duck's birthday, I can
reply, "Yes, I know! And did you also know that this day in Roman
history was significant because ..." What a delightful way to let
others know about NR. :) -Cassia Silvana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37107 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION)
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

Scripsit M. Octavius:

> The overabundance of laws and lawyers here has
> strangled this
> organization.

Is it any wonder, when the whole political system is
set up to reward legalistic skills and argumentation?

The entire organization is based on a legal document,
and any attempt to do anything in the organization
must necessarily negotiate its way around that legal
document and the others which derive from it. The
people who are best able to do that are therefore at a
considerable advantage. I know because I'm one of
those people.

This will remain the case as long as our republic
finds its basis in a legal document - a written,
entrenched constitution. If we want this to change we
have to start with the root of the problem: repeal the
constitution and allow the sovereignty of the republic
to lie with the senate and the people, as it did in
the old republic. Only then will we be able to stop
discussing what the constitution says and start
discussing what we should actually do for the benefit
of the community.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37108 From: laurent_coffre@bat.com Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION)
Salvete omnes,

After much personal thought on the matter, I have decided that I would
agree with Cordus. Our constitution has now become more an hindrance than
the necessary blanket which is supposed to protect our rights.
Any new development of our organisation, no matter how well founded, is
constantly and repeatedly judged first against what a written text says.
Guess what, we don't all agree about what that text says and there is no
superior authority to fulfill the role of final arbiter...ergo, we are
stuck.

Yes, I agree with Cordus and I wish we could adopt a workable and
historical way of legislating our way of life in Nova Roma. The
constitution must be repealed.

Valete

C. Moravius Laureatus





"A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@y To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
ahoo.co.uk> cc: (bcc: Laurent Coffre/Southampton/GB/BATCo)
Sent by: Subject: [Nova-Roma] "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION)
Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.
com


15/08/2005 15:56
Please respond to
Nova-Roma






A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

Scripsit M. Octavius:

> The overabundance of laws and lawyers here has
> strangled this
> organization.

Is it any wonder, when the whole political system is
set up to reward legalistic skills and argumentation?

The entire organization is based on a legal document,
and any attempt to do anything in the organization
must necessarily negotiate its way around that legal
document and the others which derive from it. The
people who are best able to do that are therefore at a
considerable advantage. I know because I'm one of
those people.

This will remain the case as long as our republic
finds its basis in a legal document - a written,
entrenched constitution. If we want this to change we
have to start with the root of the problem: repeal the
constitution and allow the sovereignty of the republic
to lie with the senate and the people, as it did in
the old republic. Only then will we be able to stop
discussing what the constitution says and start
discussing what we should actually do for the benefit
of the community.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo!
Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com


SPONSORED LINKS

Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The roman empire



YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.





_____________________________________________________________________
Confidentiality Notice: The information in this document and attachments is confidential and may also be legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the named recipient.
Internet communications are not secure and therefore British American Tobacco does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and then delete this document. Do not disclose the contents of this document to any other person, nor take any copies.
Violation of this notice may be unlawful.
______________________________________________________________________
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37109 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION)
G. Equitius Cato A. Apollonio Cordo C. Moravio Laureato quiritibusque
S.P.D.

Salvete omnes!

Hooray! I stand very firmly on the side of those wishing to repeal
the instrument of so much confusion and legal frustration in our res
publica.

I have said it before and repeat it now: to try to govern a political
entity with its roots in 2500-year-old processes using an 18th-century
A.D. document is an exercize not only in futility but indeed one of
masochism.

Let us end this farce and adopt a more historic approach to our legal
existence.

Constitutio delenda est.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37110 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION)
Aula Tullia Scholastica Gaio Equitio Catoni Aulo Apollonio Cordo quiritibus,
sociis, peregrinisque omnibus S.P.D.

> G. Equitius Cato A. Apollonio Cordo C. Moravio Laureato quiritibusque
> S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes!
>
> Hooray! I stand very firmly on the side of those wishing to repeal
> the instrument of so much confusion and legal frustration in our res
> publica.
>
> I have said it before and repeat it now: to try to govern a political
> entity with its roots in 2500-year-old processes using an 18th-century
> A.D. document is an exercize not only in futility but indeed one of
> masochism.
>
> Let us end this farce and adopt a more historic approach to our legal
> existence.
>
> Constitutio delenda est.

Only if you want to destroy NR as well--in the course of certain
deliberations with our webmaster, Quintus Cassius Calvus, he has informed me
that the state of Maine, in which NR is incorporated, requires such a
document, and that he doubts that there are places which would differ in
their requirements for this type of corporation at least.

>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
Valete quam optime,

A. Tullia Scholastica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37111 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION)
Salvete,

this has been the main concern in order to attract new citizens. At least in Gallia (I do
not know well enough other macronations), and as I submitted in the very promising
Go_Roman project, French people have received a rather strong education on history and
those who might be interested in Nova Roma (and of course the students) know that ancient
Rome did not have a constitution. So it is rather difficult to present Nova Roma as a
revival of ancient Rome and at the same time be credible in having a constitution. As the
main lines on the web site states: "We are nothing less than a sovereign nation; an
attempt to re-create the best of classical pagan Rome (with a few compromises to modern
times)". I do not think that having a constitution is only a compromise to the modern
times. It is a document that conducts our nation.

I do not know at this point if we should scratch the Constitution. We could as well and
only change those few lines on the web site.

Valete,

Sextus Apollonius Scipio
Propraetor Galliae


--- "A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...> wrote:

> A. Apollonius omnibus sal.
>
> Scripsit M. Octavius:
>
> > The overabundance of laws and lawyers here has
> > strangled this
> > organization.
>
> Is it any wonder, when the whole political system is
> set up to reward legalistic skills and argumentation?
>
> The entire organization is based on a legal document,
> and any attempt to do anything in the organization
> must necessarily negotiate its way around that legal
> document and the others which derive from it. The
> people who are best able to do that are therefore at a
> considerable advantage. I know because I'm one of
> those people.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37112 From: Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Laws and their effect on the Census
Salvete omnes,

Since my return from the Conventus I have been catching back on the
discussions that happened in our beloved forum while I was away. One
of particular interest to me concerned the "over-legal" state of our
institutions and its influence on the number of applications we, in
the censors office, receive on a daily basis.

I would like, on this point, get the record straight as I have, in my
quality of Rogator, access to the relevant data.

Last year, before the full implementation of the name edicts
(published in October 2757 and in force in November) we received 389
applications from March to December or 233 pro rata over 6 months.

This year, now that the name edicts are in full force, we have
received 267 applications over 6 months from January to June, an
increase of 14.60%.

The first conclusion to be learned from that is that higher standards
or the publication of more legal documents in the form of edicta have
NOT discouraged people from applying. Ergo, the so called "law
overkill" is not directly linked to the number of applications
received.

I would also like to comment on a phenomenon we have observed while
processing applications under the new "probationary" system: A very
large number of applicants who have been given provisional
citizenship, after resolving apparently unsurmontable obstacles to
find a name, do NOT contact us or reply to us when we send them the
very simple test necessary to complete before they can receive full
citizenship.
On the other hand, as Cato has mentioned, the numbers of subscribers
have indeed dramatically increased during that same period. Somebody
must be listening or they would just unsuscribe.

It seems to me that many of our provisional citizens are quite happy
to have been granted a Roman name and follow the discussions of our
forum from afar.
This, to me, is where the real problem that Nova Roma will be facing
in the near future lies: In one hand many of us consider Nova Roma as
a nation and do consider citizenship something to be treasured, no
matter the amount of legal stuff thrown at us. Many others are
conversely quite happy to see Nova Roma only as a cultural
association and prefer to enjoy the various cultural or political
discussions, under the cover of a Roman name, without necessarily
wishing to take Roman citizenship seriously.

I am increasignly getting convinced that if the Census is
disappointing this year it is because we have two different
conceptual views of our organisation/Nation, not because the
organisation/Nation itself has too many or too little laws.

I believe it is time we had a debate about what Nova Roma really
wants to be. A Nation, in which case citizenship must be prized and
numbers do not matter so much or a cultural organisation that needs
to raise funds for whatever project and therefore needs membersÂ…

I have no answer as yet; The only thing I can do is to give you all
the statistical data and let you make up your own mindÂ…

Optime valete

C. Moravius Laureatus Armoricus
Rogator
Legatus Britanniae
Scriba Censoris
The Constitution must be repealed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37113 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION)
G. Equitius Cato A. Tulliae Scholasticae quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Scholastica, there is an extraordinarily easy remedy for your concern.

The State of Maine only requires that we have By-Laws. The
Constitution (I.C) says that it itself is the By-Laws. Remove
Article I.6 from the Constitution, set up a simple set of By-Laws that
are in accordance with Maine State law, and the problem is solved.

The State of Maine (or any U.S. State, for that matter) is not
concerned with HOW we do what we do, they are only concerned with WHAT
we do, as that affects our incorporate and not-for-profit status. We
need to explain that we have officers and members, etc., but the
definitions and extremely detailed information contained in the
Constitution (the descriptions of the various powers of magistrates,
etc.) are totally unnecessary. I know, as I've written and/or
re-written the By-Laws of several macronational not-for-profit
organizations in several U.S. States.

As a matter of fact, if you look at the papers of incorporation, under
our agreement with the State of Maine, the Board of Directors cannot
consist of more than thirty (30) persons. Since our Constitution
(which doubles as our legal By-Laws) states that "The Board of
Directors of the corporation shall be composed of the Senate of Nova
Roma", then legally the Senate can NEVER be made up of more than 30
persons without violating macronational law. This means that the
current lex under consideration, the lex Popillia, would essentially
be rendered meaningless because it would be illegal to add anyone to
the Senate if by doing so the number would exceed 30.

So. How to get ourselves out of this mess? First, write a new,
simple set of By-Laws and lodge them with the State of Maine.
Simultaneously, amend the Constitution to remove Article I Section C.

This would both remove all further fears about violating our
macronational standing with the state of Maine AND free ourselves up
to truly adddress the abolishment of the Constitution.

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37114 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATESESSION)
Omnibus civibus praesertim Catoni ac A Tulliae Scholasticae salutem dico Â…

Now perhaps I am naïve, but …

If it is necessary to breathe real life into Nova Roma and not be hidebound
by a lengthy and legally complex constitution (thanks for the ironic chuckle
you gave me, Cato, with ‘constitutio delenda est’ …), and if at the same
time the State of Maine requires a legal constitution, then why not have a
simple one-sentence constitution as a ideal against which to measure
everything?

Before dismissing this as an example of ignorant naivety, please give it a
thought.

Sextus Pilatus Barbatus.



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of A. Tullia Scholastica
Sent: 15 August 2005 17:24
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the
SENATESESSION)



Aula Tullia Scholastica Gaio Equitio Catoni Aulo Apollonio Cordo quiritibus,
sociis, peregrinisque omnibus S.P.D.

> G. Equitius Cato A. Apollonio Cordo C. Moravio Laureato quiritibusque
> S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes!
>
> Hooray! I stand very firmly on the side of those wishing to repeal
> the instrument of so much confusion and legal frustration in our res
> publica.
>
> I have said it before and repeat it now: to try to govern a political
> entity with its roots in 2500-year-old processes using an 18th-century
> A.D. document is an exercize not only in futility but indeed one of
> masochism.
>
> Let us end this farce and adopt a more historic approach to our legal
> existence.
>
> Constitutio delenda est.

Only if you want to destroy NR as well--in the course of certain
deliberations with our webmaster, Quintus Cassius Calvus, he has informed me
that the state of Maine, in which NR is incorporated, requires such a
document, and that he doubts that there are places which would differ in
their requirements for this type of corporation at least.

>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
Valete quam optime,

A. Tullia Scholastica






SPONSORED LINKS


Ancient
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=F
all+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+roman+empire&c=3&s=73&.sig=WUTlMtENoMRB6MOID9
-IPQ> history

Fall
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+his
tory&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+roman+empire&c=3&s=73&.sig=7ZPJH_Xak
fyQXSLqXlFYDQ> of the roman empire

The
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=
Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+roman+empire&c=3&s=73&.sig=EupvctrPtcX3_ywoe
bvYDQ> roman empire



_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37115 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATESESSION)
A. Apollonius Sex. Pilato omnibusque sal.

Scripsisti:

> If it is necessary to breathe real life into Nova
> Roma and not be hidebound
> by a lengthy and legally complex constitution
> (thanks for the ironic chuckle
> you gave me, Cato, with ‘constitutio delenda est’
> Â…), and if at the same
> time the State of Maine requires a legal
> constitution, then why not have a
> simple one-sentence constitution as a ideal against
> which to measure
> everything?
>
> Before dismissing this as an example of ignorant
> naivety, please give it a
> thought.

It's a nice dodge, but in some important ways it
doesn't do the job we need to do. The crucial thing is
to move to a more Roman way of thinking about law and
politics. You and I have little problem with this
since our home country has a non-rigid, non-codified
constitution. The term "unconstitutional" doesn't
really enter into the British political or legal
lexicon, and when it is used it refers to something
which is inimical to the basic principles or essence
of the British constitutional tradition. But in Nova
Roma the word "unconstitutional" must be among the
most common words after "the" and "and", and its
meaning is much narrower: it refers to something which
is in contradiction of the literal wording of the
document entitled "constitution".

The Romans, needless to say, subscribed to the British
approach, or rather the British subscribe to the Roman
approach. The essence of this approach is that the
ideals and principles of the constitution are nowhere
embodied in legally binding documents. The principles
are there, but they have some give in them, allowing
them to bend and stretch according to the times. When
those principles are once written down, they become
brittle. They are laid down in words for everyone to
inspect and pick over. This is intended to make them
more resilient, but in fact it makes them lifeless and
full of holes and contradictions. It's like trying to
write down what red is.

So even if a one-sentence constitution would satisfy
the state of Maine, it would not satisfy the needs of
our republic. A constitution even of only one sentence
would encourage people to judge the constitutionality
of this or that by reading the sentence and forming
opinions about its compatibility with the thing in
question, whereas we want to encourage people to judge
the constitutionality of things with reference to the
underlying structure and principles of the republic.

The preamble to the current constitution is little
more than a sentence, and aims to set out some ideals
against which to measure everything else. It has
caused nothing but trouble. Every Gaiusque Luciusque
tries to co-opt this or that word or phrase in the
preamble to support his own ideology or whatever point
he happens to be making at the time. It's too vague to
be legally enforceable, of course, and this makes the
preamble a source of endless contention with no hope
of resolution.

It seems to me an equally simple but more satisfactory
solution to say simply that our by-laws comprise all
the leges in force at the time, if that's possible. If
not, perhaps we should think of simply not being
incorporated in Maine. Incorporation as a non-profit
company is for our benefit; if it stops us doing what
we want to do then it's not a benefit any more but a hindrance.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37116 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: Redivimus
Marinus Cordus amico sal,

"A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...> writes:

> Well, Livia and I are now back from Rome and Ireland.

Ah, I see you took in both pinnacles of western civilization.

(*twinkle*)

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37117 From: Reccanello Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: The Calendar
Cato wrote in part
"I will no longer post the calendar. I hope that this will satisfy you, Celetrus, and you may take full credit for it."

Noooooooo!!! Please, Cato, reconsider.

The Calendar is one of the most interest things in Nova Roma and I thnak you for this!!!

Please!!! Post the Calendar!!!
Valete
C·ARMINIVS·RECCANELLVS
PROPRAETOR·PROVINCIAE·BRASILIAE
"Quousque tandem, Lula, abutere patientia nostra?"

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37118 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATESESSION)
G. Equitius Cato A. Apollonio Cordo S. Pilato Barbato quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Cordus, you wrote,

"It seems to me an equally simple but more satisfactory solution to
say simply that our by-laws comprise all the leges in force at the
time, if that's possible."

CATO: It is possible, as long as the basic elements required by the
State of Maine are present, to include the entire works of Will and
Ariel Durant, the complete OED, and the Bhagavad-Gita as part of our
By-Laws, if we chose to do so :-)

What I am trying to urge is that we go in precisely the opposite
direction, and make our macronational By-Laws as simple as possible,
using only what is expressly required by the law in Maine.


"If not, perhaps we should think of simply not being incorporated in
Maine. Incorporation as a non-profit company is for our benefit; if it
stops us doing what we want to do then it's not a benefit any more but
a hindrance."

CATO: Well, there's a thought. We could unincorporate, and it would
absolutely NOT destroy Nova Roma --- we'd simply be an unicorporated
organization. There are hundreds, if not thousands, of unincorporated
towns and villages in the United States, and the people living in them
are completely content for them to remain that way. Another option
would be to incorporate in a state with less stringent incorporation
laws. Delware is a prime example.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37119 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Constitutions and By-Laws
Salvete quirites,

"A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...> writes:
> ... Incorporation as a non-profit
> company is for our benefit; if it stops us doing what
> we want to do then it's not a benefit any more but a hindrance.

Believe me Corde, we don't want to stop being incorporated as a non-profit.
The moment we do so we are subject to quarterly tax payments that would, in
very short order, consume our entire treasury. So it is in our interest to
remain a non-profit corporation.

That said, what we need to have as a corporation is a set of by-laws. These
need not be in the form of the constitution we have now, and I think that the
discussion that needs to be had, both here and in the Senate, is whether or
not to separate the Constitution (whether written or unwritten) from the
corporate bylaws.

Valete quirites,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37120 From: Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Nemoralia, August 13-15
Festival of Torches

Nemoralia (aka Festival of Torches), later adopted by Catholics as
The Feast of the Assumption. This festival is celebrated either on
the 13-15th of August or on the August Full Moon, in honor of the
goddess Diana.

Ovid describes the celebration thusly:

"In the Arrician valley,
there is a lake surrounded by shady forests,
Held sacred by a religion from the olden times...
On a long fence hang many pieces of woven thread,
and many tablets are placed there
as grateful gifts to the Goddess.
Often does a woman whose prayers Diana answered,
With a wreath of flowers crowning her head,
Walk from Rome carrying a burning torch...
There a stream flows down gurgling from its rocky bed..."

On this day, worshippers form a shimmering procession of torches and
candles around the dark waters of Lake Nemi (Nemi, from the Latin
nemus, meaning sacred wood or sacred grove), Diana's Mirror. The
lights of their candles join the light of the moon, dancing in
reflection upon the surface of the water. Today's festival is held in
the Greek fashion.

Hundreds join together at the lake, wearing wreaths of flowers.
According to Plutarch, part of the ritual (before the procession
around the lake) is the washing of hair and dressing it with flowers.
It is a day of rest for women and slaves. Hounds are also honored and
dressed with blossoms. Travellers between the north and south banks
of the lake are carried in small boats lit by lanterns. Similar lamps
were used by Vestal virgins and have been found with images of the
Goddess at Nemi, so Diana and Vesta are sometimes considered to be
the same Goddess.

One 1st century CE Roman poet, Propertius, did not attend the
festival, but observed it from the periphery as indicated in these
words to his beloved:

"Ah, if you would only walk here in your leisure hours.
But we cannot meet today,
When I see you hurrying in excitement with a burning torch
To the grove of Nemi where you
Bear light in honour of the Goddess Diana."

Requests and offerings to Diana may include: small written messages
on ribbons, tied to the altar or to trees; small baked clay or bread
statuettes of body parts in need of healing; small clay images of
mother and child; tiny sculptures of stags; dance and song; and fruit
such as apples.

In addition, offerings of garlic are made to the Goddess of the Dark
Moon, Hecate, during the festival. Hunting or killing of any beast is
forbidden on Nemoralia.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37121 From: Samantha Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Salvete and Nemoralia and Vesta
I apologize for my absence of late, I am having issues with getting into school
(who knew transfering was such a pain in the rear). At any rate I try to check
my email on a somewhat regular basis though this school thing has been
taking up all of my internet time that I pay for.
Regardless I will be making a better attempt to at least answer private emails
in a timely manner, and swing by here once in a while, though with the mass of
posts here I will probably more then likely just skim until I have my own
computer and home internet access *grins*.

I worked a double so my Nemoralia ritual was much smaller then last year,
having worked from noon until two am, I was rather exhausted and in no shape
to do a full length ritual to the extent that I normally do. As always on Nemoralia
I gave gifts that were NOT of animal product on this day, and gifted as many
flowers that I could find on my return to my room (not as many as I would have
liked). For those who are unaware Nemoralia was on the 13th of this month.

Also I have been keeping up with my service to Vesta. In my move down here
my oil lamp broke, so I have been making do with large candles encased in
glass. While I am not permitted where I am at to keep it burning at all times, It
is burning at all times that I am home. I may be acquiring room mates soon, so
that may make it a little easier to have a flame going more consistantly. And
when school starts I will have more hours at home.. albeit doing homework but
still home.

Valete
Lucia Modia Lupa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37122 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: Constitutions and By-Laws
Salve,

If Nova Roma disincorporated as a non-profit according to
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p557.pdf see page 19 bottom left hand
corner (real fun reading that IRS stuff) if Nova Roma dissolved the
assets of Nova Roma would have to be distributed to either another
IRS recognized non-profit organization or organizations, or the
federal government, or to a state or local government for a public
purpose. That means good bye 10 acres in Texas, goodbye treasury.
Nova Roma would have to start all over with no land and no money.
Major step backwards there.

Vale,

Q. Cassius Calvus




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@c...> wrote:
> Salvete quirites,
>
> "A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@y...> writes:
> > ... Incorporation as a non-profit
> > company is for our benefit; if it stops us doing what
> > we want to do then it's not a benefit any more but a hindrance.
>
> Believe me Corde, we don't want to stop being incorporated as a
non-profit.
> The moment we do so we are subject to quarterly tax payments that
would, in
> very short order, consume our entire treasury. So it is in our
interest to
> remain a non-profit corporation.
>
> That said, what we need to have as a corporation is a set of by-
laws. These
> need not be in the form of the constitution we have now, and I
think that the
> discussion that needs to be had, both here and in the Senate, is
whether or
> not to separate the Constitution (whether written or unwritten)
from the
> corporate bylaws.
>
> Valete quirites,
>
> -- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37123 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: Constitutions and By-Laws
G. Equitius Cato Gn. Equitio Marino Censore A. Apollonio Cordo
quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Censor, you wrote,

"That said, what we need to have as a corporation is a set of by-laws.
These need not be in the form of the constitution we have now, and I
think that the discussion that needs to be had, both here and in the
Senate, is whether or not to separate the Constitution (whether
written or unwritten) from the corporate bylaws."


Precisely. I believe they should be separated, and with all possible
speed. The fact that our Constitution takes upon itself double-duty
as our By-Laws is truly unnecessary; separating them and lodging
simple corporate By-Laws with the State of Maine will then release us
to form a legal and political structure vastly more closely in tune
with that of the ancient Republic, i.e., abolishing the written
Constitution.

And bear in mind the limit we have set on ourselves regarding the
Board of Directors/Senate. We need to either change the number we
have submitted to the State of Maine or find a group of magistrates
that will never exceed 30 persons to serve as our Board.

Constitutio delenda est.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37124 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION)
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
<mlcinnyc@y...> wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato A. Tulliae Scholasticae quiritibusque S.P.D.
> As a matter of fact, if you look at the papers of incorporation,
under
> our agreement with the State of Maine, the Board of Directors
cannot
> consist of more than thirty (30) persons. Since our Constitution
> (which doubles as our legal By-Laws) states that "The Board of
> Directors of the corporation shall be composed of the Senate of
Nova
> Roma", then legally the Senate can NEVER be made up of more than 30
> persons without violating macronational law. This means that the
> current lex under consideration, the lex Popillia, would
essentially
> be rendered meaningless because it would be illegal to add anyone
to
> the Senate if by doing so the number would exceed 30.

Salve,

No big deal there. All that has to be done is file an Articles of
Amendment with the Secretary of States office to up the maximum
number of people on the Board of Directors. Nova Roma has amended
her Articles of Incorporation before:

http://www.novaroma.org/aerarium_saturni/amendment1.pdf and
http://www.novaroma.org/aerarium_saturni/amendment2.pdf for the
other half of that Articles of Amendment.

All it takes is paperwork and of course a filing fee.

Vale,

Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37125 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: Constitutions and By-Laws
Salve Cato, et salvete omnes,

gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> writes:

> And bear in mind the limit we have set on ourselves regarding the
> Board of Directors/Senate. We need to either change the number we
> have submitted to the State of Maine or find a group of magistrates
> that will never exceed 30 persons to serve as our Board.

I'm way ahead of you amice. Back late last year I had Patricia Cassia file a
request to change that number from 30 to 50, anticipating the need.
Eventually the State of Maine will act on our request, and the updated
charter will be posted.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37126 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: [conventus2758] Some pics from the Conventus:let's try again
Thank you for sharing your pictures. They're most enjoyable.
Look forward to seeing more.

Maxima Valeria Messallina

Marcus Iulius Perusianus <m_iulius@...> wrote:

Avete Sabine amice omnesque,

I'd like to share some pics from the last day of the Conventus:

see at
http://it.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/m_iulius/album?.dir=/fc46&.src=ph

117: NovaRomans off the sacred wood of Nymph Egeria, whist the shape
of Volcano Latialis is i the background

120: stop talking about politics, we're approching the great
acqueduct of Appius Claudius

161: NovaRomans: too tired...the Tomb of Cecilia Metella can wait
half an hour ;-)

128: Cato leads the group on the Appian Way, carefully cheking the
flagstones ;-)

135: <<Am I or not the Sr Consul?>>

090: paying respect to the temple of Deus Redicolus (God of Good
Return) ...for a new come to Rome soon.. I know, I know...this is
Annia Regilla Sepulcher..... eh eh

more to come...

valete
M IVL PERVSIANVS

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37127 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Virtual Model of Ostia Antica: Ostia Antica - the harbour of Ancien
Salve Romans

for those who have not seen this its great!

Virtual Model of Ostia Antica: Ostia Antica - the harbour of Ancient ... <http://www.artrecon.com/Frames/GalleryFr_OstiaVM_ENG_2.html>

its in English and French

Vale


Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37128 From: Marcus Iulius Severus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: PLEASE, CATO
Salve, Cato et salvete, omnes:

The calendar is just wonderful. Please, keep posting it. We need it.

Vale et valete,

Marcvs Ivlivs Severvs

--
_______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.

Powered by Outblaze
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37129 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers"
Salve Cato

who said in part

"I have said it before and repeat it now: to try to govern a political
entity with its roots in 2500-year-old processes using an 18th-century
A.D. document is an exercise not only in futility but indeed one of
masochism."

The issue of repealing our written constitution I leave for another post.

I will state however that the last time I checked the worlds largest military and economic power is, as you have so elegantly stated, "a political entity with its roots in 2500-year-old processes using an 18th-century A.D. document"

and it has done quite well to date.: )


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37130 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: incorporate in a state with less ...
Salve Romans

Cato said in part


"Another option would be to incorporate in a state with less stringent incorporation laws. Delaware is a prime example."


Wasn't there a Senate committee/commission set up to look at this issue last year or the year before??


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37131 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: incorporate in a state with less ...
Salve Tiberi Galeri, et salvete quirites,

> Wasn't there a Senate committee/commission set up to look at this issue
> last year or the year before??

There was. I established a commission of Senators and that commission did
absolutely nothing. Interested parties may check the Tabularium to learn the
names of those Senatores who were appointed to the incorporation commission.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37132 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Appointment of Scriba
Edict of Appointment of Scriba

I, Quintus Cassius Calvus, as Magister Aranearius of Nova Roma do
hereby appoint Tiberius Galerius Paulinus as Scriba Aranearius.

No oath of office shall be required.

This Edict is effective immediately.

Given 15th Aug 2758
In the Consulship of
Franciscus Apulus Caesar
and
Gaius Popillius Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37133 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers"
G. Equitius Cato Gn. Equitio Marino Censore Q. Cassio Calvo T. Galerio
Paulino quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Censor, it does not surprise me that you had the forethought to apply
for an amendment to our incorporation papers regarding the BoD/Senate.
So that's all right, then.

Calvus, if we decided to change the state in which we are
incorporated, it is possible (and legal) for us to transfer our assets
in their entirety; but you are absolutely correct in that we must, by
necessity, be incorporated *somewhere* to do so.

Paulinus, you wrote,

"I will state however that the last time I checked the worlds largest
military and economic power is, as you have so elegantly stated, 'a
political entity with its roots in 2500-year-old processes using an
18th-century A.D. document' and it has done quite well to date. :)"

Well said. But that power also has a system by which that written
instrument may be definitively interpreted; that power does not have a
group of magistrates with the untouchable power to halt any action;
that power does not have a State religion which is basically a law
unto itself; that power was formed around an absolute reliance upon a
written document, purposefully and with the idea that that instrument
would be used to protect the People.

The fundamental difference is that in the U.S., when there is a
question of law, we ask "What does the Constitution say?" in judging
whether or not that law should be upheld or rejected --- and there is
a body authorized to proclaim the ultimate and irreversible (except by
itself) answer --- and we assume that the ideas inherent in, and
protected by, the U.S. Constitution are in and of themselves correct
and worthy of being used to measure the legality of any action; in
Rome, the question was always "What do the PEOPLE say?" --- it simply
requires the People to answer that question themselves and protect
themselves by passing laws which do so.

In U.S. law the Constitution and the Federal and state governmental
bodies created by it stand in for "the People" in the courtroom ---
in Rome it was one person acting against one other person, with the
People acting for themselves if and when necessary.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37134 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: incorporate in a state with less ...
G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Gn. Equitio Marino, T. Galerio
Paulino omnibusque SPD.

If anyone wants to look at an alternate template for
a non-profit society's constitution and by-laws, I
offer the site below.

We just completed the registration of a non-profit fencing
club in our community (2004). I was responsible for most
of the set-up paperwork. Yes, there are alot of groups in
town that are *not* registered (ie incorporated) as non-profit
societies, and they do alot of great stuff. But they run
into problems especially around fund-raising, which it seems
to me Nova Roma does through taxes, the Magna Mater Project,
etc. Getting insurance may be another hurdle.

The government of British Columbia offers a cookie-cutter
approach to the process. You have three options for your
founding documents: 1) write your own document in its
entirety; 2) use the basic constitution and bylaws provided
by the provincial government; 3) use the basic document but
append a list of amendments your society wants, to make the
generic document fit your society better.

The *Constitution* is a very brief statement that needs to
contain the name of the proposed society, its purpose, and
what will happen if it wraps up (closes). That's all.
Everything else is in the bylaws, which must cover basic
administrative stuff, like defining membership, defining
society officers, procedures for elections and meetings,
etc.

Yes, with the current international climate, this is one
way to avoid being classified as a "cult", or other
potentially harmful organization. If Nova Roma is to
be a reconstruction in the modern world of the best that
was Roman civilization, incorporation (somewhere)is probably
essential. "Render unto Caesar . . . ." :-)

WEBSITE:
Government of British Columbia corporate registries,
Socities page:

www.fin.gov.bc.ca/registries/corppg/crsocieties.htm

The blurb at the top of the page says:
"From this page you can download and print to your own printer
most of the Society Act forms and information packages.

Valete in pace Deorum.
G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@c...> wrote:
> Salve Tiberi Galeri, et salvete quirites,
>
> > Wasn't there a Senate committee/commission set up to look at this
issue
> > last year or the year before??
>
> There was. I established a commission of Senators and that
commission did
> absolutely nothing. Interested parties may check the Tabularium to
learn the
> names of those Senatores who were appointed to the incorporation
commission.
>
> Valete,
>
> -- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37135 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-15
Subject: Re: incorporate in a state with less ...
Salvete omnes,

One thing I would like to find out is if there is any way NR could
incorporate herself in Canada, Europe and South America in order to
get a charity type tax number so that non-Americans could donate and
recieve tax write offs for their donations. Also the various Legions
could do the same. In that way I would be happy to donate a lot more
money than I do as would many others. As we found out in other
organizations, people and sponsers can be very tight fisted when
there are no write offs.

Gaia Aurelia Falconis Silvana, I see from your note below that you
are right up on this; do you have any suggestions on how to go about
this?

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus









--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana"
<silvanatextrix@g...> wrote:
> G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Gn. Equitio Marino, T. Galerio
> Paulino omnibusque SPD.
>
> If anyone wants to look at an alternate template for
> a non-profit society's constitution and by-laws, I
> offer the site below.
>
> We just completed the registration of a non-profit fencing
> club in our community (2004). I was responsible for most
> of the set-up paperwork. Yes, there are alot of groups in
> town that are *not* registered (ie incorporated) as non-profit
> societies, and they do alot of great stuff. But they run
> into problems especially around fund-raising, which it seems
> to me Nova Roma does through taxes, the Magna Mater Project,
> etc. Getting insurance may be another hurdle.
>
> The government of British Columbia offers a cookie-cutter
> approach to the process. You have three options for your
> founding documents: 1) write your own document in its
> entirety; 2) use the basic constitution and bylaws provided
> by the provincial government; 3) use the basic document but
> append a list of amendments your society wants, to make the
> generic document fit your society better.
>
> The *Constitution* is a very brief statement that needs to
> contain the name of the proposed society, its purpose, and
> what will happen if it wraps up (closes). That's all.
> Everything else is in the bylaws, which must cover basic
> administrative stuff, like defining membership, defining
> society officers, procedures for elections and meetings,
> etc.
>
> Yes, with the current international climate, this is one
> way to avoid being classified as a "cult", or other
> potentially harmful organization. If Nova Roma is to
> be a reconstruction in the modern world of the best that
> was Roman civilization, incorporation (somewhere)is probably
> essential. "Render unto Caesar . . . ." :-)
>
> WEBSITE:
> Government of British Columbia corporate registries,
> Socities page:
>
> www.fin.gov.bc.ca/registries/corppg/crsocieties.htm
>
> The blurb at the top of the page says:
> "From this page you can download and print to your own printer
> most of the Society Act forms and information packages.
>
> Valete in pace Deorum.
> G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> <gawne@c...> wrote:
> > Salve Tiberi Galeri, et salvete quirites,
> >
> > > Wasn't there a Senate committee/commission set up to look at
this
> issue
> > > last year or the year before??
> >
> > There was. I established a commission of Senators and that
> commission did
> > absolutely nothing. Interested parties may check the Tabularium
to
> learn the
> > names of those Senatores who were appointed to the incorporation
> commission.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > -- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37136 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: incorporate in a state with less ...
Salvete omnes,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) wrote:
> Salvete omnes,
>
> One thing I would like to find out is if there is any way NR could
> incorporate herself in Canada, Europe and South America

Indeed, this is something that Consul Caesar has been looking into this
year. He's still away from e-mail, being on vacation. I'm cc-ing a
copy of this note to him so that he may reply once he returns.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37137 From: Titus Arminius Genialis Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Leaving Nova Roma
Salvete L Armini Fauste, M Armini Maior, Caesar F Quintiliane et omnes

I'm deeply sad to inform that I must leave Nova Roma because I have no able time to keep my activities here.

Since some months ago, I've been some idle, some away from NR, but I was always trying to keep informed about what's happening. But now it's becoming impossible for me to do it.

Thus, I would like to ask you to void any offices (such as interpreter) I should hold.

I'm going to stop receiving group messages, although I'm not going to unsubscribe from the groups and I'll not ask annulation of my citizenship, because I hope I can come back some day.

I thank all my friends here at NR and I hope Concordia may help Nova Roma to follow its way long.

Valete optime bene.

Titus Arminius Genialis.


__________________________________________________
Converse com seus amigos em tempo real com o Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.download.yahoo.com/messenger/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37138 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: Leaving Nova Roma
Salve Titus Arminius Genialis

Best of luck and hurry back. We will be keeping a place in the forum open for you.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: Titus Arminius Genialis<mailto:tagenialis@...>
To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:nova-roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 12:29 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Leaving Nova Roma



Salvete L Armini Fauste, M Armini Maior, Caesar F Quintiliane et omnes

I'm deeply sad to inform that I must leave Nova Roma because I have no able time to keep my activities here.

Since some months ago, I've been some idle, some away from NR, but I was always trying to keep informed about what's happening. But now it's becoming impossible for me to do it.

Thus, I would like to ask you to void any offices (such as interpreter) I should hold.

I'm going to stop receiving group messages, although I'm not going to unsubscribe from the groups and I'll not ask annulation of my citizenship, because I hope I can come back some day.

I thank all my friends here at NR and I hope Concordia may help Nova Roma to follow its way long.

Valete optime bene.

Titus Arminius Genialis.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37139 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: Appointment of Scriba
Salve Quintus Cassius Calvus

Thanks, I think : )

vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Scriba Aranearius
----- Original Message -----
From: quintuscassiuscalvus<mailto:richmal@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 8:54 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Appointment of Scriba


Edict of Appointment of Scriba

I, Quintus Cassius Calvus, as Magister Aranearius of Nova Roma do
hereby appoint Tiberius Galerius Paulinus as Scriba Aranearius.

No oath of office shall be required.

This Edict is effective immediately.

Given 15th Aug 2758
In the Consulship of
Franciscus Apulus Caesar
and
Gaius Popillius Laenas






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37140 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATESESSION)
Gratias, Corde - interesting observations. I wonder, therefore, as a
"newbie" for whom endless picking at the significance of wording seems to be
sapping the vitality of a nation attempting to resurrect the virtues,
qualities and culture of Rome (though I don't doubt that it would be
endlessly intriguing for the lawyers amongst us), if perhaps a "set of
principles" might do the trick, setting out the aims of the Republic rather
than imposing a rigid set of laws. Just another thought, that's all!

Vale optime, omnesque valete optime!

Sextus Pilatus Barbatus



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of A. Apollonius Cordus
Sent: 15 August 2005 20:02
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the
SENATESESSION)



A. Apollonius Sex. Pilato omnibusque sal.

Scripsisti:

> If it is necessary to breathe real life into Nova
> Roma and not be hidebound
> by a lengthy and legally complex constitution
> (thanks for the ironic chuckle
> you gave me, Cato, with 'constitutio delenda est'
> .), and if at the same
> time the State of Maine requires a legal
> constitution, then why not have a
> simple one-sentence constitution as a ideal against
> which to measure
> everything?
>
> Before dismissing this as an example of ignorant
> naivety, please give it a
> thought.

It's a nice dodge, but in some important ways it
doesn't do the job we need to do. The crucial thing is
to move to a more Roman way of thinking about law and
politics. You and I have little problem with this
since our home country has a non-rigid, non-codified
constitution. The term "unconstitutional" doesn't
really enter into the British political or legal
lexicon, and when it is used it refers to something
which is inimical to the basic principles or essence
of the British constitutional tradition. But in Nova
Roma the word "unconstitutional" must be among the
most common words after "the" and "and", and its
meaning is much narrower: it refers to something which
is in contradiction of the literal wording of the
document entitled "constitution".

The Romans, needless to say, subscribed to the British
approach, or rather the British subscribe to the Roman
approach. The essence of this approach is that the
ideals and principles of the constitution are nowhere
embodied in legally binding documents. The principles
are there, but they have some give in them, allowing
them to bend and stretch according to the times. When
those principles are once written down, they become
brittle. They are laid down in words for everyone to
inspect and pick over. This is intended to make them
more resilient, but in fact it makes them lifeless and
full of holes and contradictions. It's like trying to
write down what red is.

So even if a one-sentence constitution would satisfy
the state of Maine, it would not satisfy the needs of
our republic. A constitution even of only one sentence
would encourage people to judge the constitutionality
of this or that by reading the sentence and forming
opinions about its compatibility with the thing in
question, whereas we want to encourage people to judge
the constitutionality of things with reference to the
underlying structure and principles of the republic.

The preamble to the current constitution is little
more than a sentence, and aims to set out some ideals
against which to measure everything else. It has
caused nothing but trouble. Every Gaiusque Luciusque
tries to co-opt this or that word or phrase in the
preamble to support his own ideology or whatever point
he happens to be making at the time. It's too vague to
be legally enforceable, of course, and this makes the
preamble a source of endless contention with no hope
of resolution.

It seems to me an equally simple but more satisfactory
solution to say simply that our by-laws comprise all
the leges in force at the time, if that's possible. If
not, perhaps we should think of simply not being
incorporated in Maine. Incorporation as a non-profit
company is for our benefit; if it stops us doing what
we want to do then it's not a benefit any more but a hindrance.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo!
Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com



SPONSORED LINKS


Ancient
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=F
all+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+roman+empire&c=3&s=73&.sig=WUTlMtENoMRB6MOID9
-IPQ> history

Fall
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+his
tory&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+roman+empire&c=3&s=73&.sig=7ZPJH_Xak
fyQXSLqXlFYDQ> of the roman empire

The
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=
Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+roman+empire&c=3&s=73&.sig=EupvctrPtcX3_ywoe
bvYDQ> roman empire



_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37142 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATESESSION)
A. Apollonius Sex. Pilato omnibusque sal.

Scripsisti:

> Gratias, Corde - interesting observations. I wonder,
> therefore, as a
> "newbie" for whom endless picking at the
> significance of wording seems to be
> sapping the vitality of a nation attempting to
> resurrect the virtues,
> qualities and culture of Rome (though I don't doubt
> that it would be
> endlessly intriguing for the lawyers amongst us), if
> perhaps a "set of
> principles" might do the trick, setting out the aims
> of the Republic rather
> than imposing a rigid set of laws. Just another
> thought, that's all!

It's certainly a possibility; one among the many
possible ways to implement a change from our current
constitution to a more historical arrangement. Each
possibility has its advantages and disadvantages, of
course, and no doubt we'll cover them all quite
comprehensively when we eventually get to the point of
deciding to make that change. I'm still contemplating
the question myself.

The problem with writing down a set of principles is
that even this threatens to create something
resembling an authoritative document against which all
else must be measured. And whenever one has an
authoritative document one confronts questions of who
has the authority to interpret it or to alter it. Who
would draw up the document, and from where would they
derive the authority to do so? Really the ideal is
simply for the basic principles of the Roman
constitution to be taught and learned in the same way
as they were in the old republic: from experience,
from observation, from the reading of history, from
the speeches of orators, from the plays in the
theatre, from conversations with elder statesmen, and
so on. But that, too, has its disadvantages, of
course. :)

To be honest I'm just extremely pleased that we are
having a serious conversation in this forum about how
to replace the constitution. Previously the
conversation has tended to run something like:

"Let's get rid of the rigid constitution."
"That's a stupid idea."

So, discouraging though it may seem, it's actually a
great advance to have reached a conversation like the
current one which runs something like:

"Let's get rid of the rigid constitution."
"That would be difficult."

I just hope that those people who are pointing out the
difficulties are doing so in a genuinely constructive
spirit and not, as regrettably happens so often in
Nova Roma, trying to bury a proposal with practical
objections in order to save themselves the effort of
engaging with the issue in principle.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37143 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATESESSION)
Sextus Pilatus Barbatus omnibus et praesertim A Apolloni Cordo salutem
dicit.



These days every institution, political, educational, commercial,
charitable, seems to have what is known as a 'mssion statement', now
apparently a sine qua non of all public human activity (I came across one in
a small restaurant the other day!). It was something along these lines that
I was thinking about when I said "set of principles". As this would not be
enshrined in a body of legislation, it would give people ample room to
interpret and debate it without needing legal eagles!

Valete optime :-)





_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of A. Apollonius Cordus
Sent: 16 August 2005 12:23
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the
SENATESESSION)



A. Apollonius Sex. Pilato omnibusque sal.

Scripsisti:

> Gratias, Corde - interesting observations. I wonder,
> therefore, as a
> "newbie" for whom endless picking at the
> significance of wording seems to be
> sapping the vitality of a nation attempting to
> resurrect the virtues,
> qualities and culture of Rome (though I don't doubt
> that it would be
> endlessly intriguing for the lawyers amongst us), if
> perhaps a "set of
> principles" might do the trick, setting out the aims
> of the Republic rather
> than imposing a rigid set of laws. Just another
> thought, that's all!

It's certainly a possibility; one among the many
possible ways to implement a change from our current
constitution to a more historical arrangement. Each
possibility has its advantages and disadvantages, of
course, and no doubt we'll cover them all quite
comprehensively when we eventually get to the point of
deciding to make that change. I'm still contemplating
the question myself.

The problem with writing down a set of principles is
that even this threatens to create something
resembling an authoritative document against which all
else must be measured. And whenever one has an
authoritative document one confronts questions of who
has the authority to interpret it or to alter it. Who
would draw up the document, and from where would they
derive the authority to do so? Really the ideal is
simply for the basic principles of the Roman
constitution to be taught and learned in the same way
as they were in the old republic: from experience,
from observation, from the reading of history, from
the speeches of orators, from the plays in the
theatre, from conversations with elder statesmen, and
so on. But that, too, has its disadvantages, of
course. :)

To be honest I'm just extremely pleased that we are
having a serious conversation in this forum about how
to replace the constitution. Previously the
conversation has tended to run something like:

"Let's get rid of the rigid constitution."
"That's a stupid idea."

So, discouraging though it may seem, it's actually a
great advance to have reached a conversation like the
current one which runs something like:

"Let's get rid of the rigid constitution."
"That would be difficult."

I just hope that those people who are pointing out the
difficulties are doing so in a genuinely constructive
spirit and not, as regrettably happens so often in
Nova Roma, trying to bury a proposal with practical
objections in order to save themselves the effort of
engaging with the issue in principle.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo!
Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com



_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37144 From: Marcus Quirinus Sulla Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: conventus-photos
conventus-photos
You can see the photos of conventus at:
http://photos.yahoo.com/giannidedom
Optime valete
Marcus Quirinus Sulla
http://it.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/giannidedom/album?.dir=/418f&.src=ph&.tok=phmsHeDBxPLapCrU




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37145 From: Reccanello Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: Leaving Nova Roma
Come back soon, Genialis!!

You are very important to Provincia Brasilia!!

Valete
C·ARMINIVS·RECCANELLVS
PROPRAETOR·PROVINCIAE·BRASILIAE
"Quousque tandem, Lula, abutere patientia nostra?"

----- Original Message -----
From: Titus Arminius Genialis
To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 1:29 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Leaving Nova Roma
Salvete L Armini Fauste, M Armini Maior, Caesar F Quintiliane et omnes
I'm deeply sad to inform that I must leave Nova Roma because I have no able time to keep my activities here.
Since some months ago, I've been some idle, some away from NR, but I was always trying to keep informed about what's happening. But now it's becoming impossible for me to do it.
Thus, I would like to ask you to void any offices (such as interpreter) I should hold.
I'm going to stop receiving group messages, although I'm not going to unsubscribe from the groups and I'll not ask annulation of my citizenship, because I hope I can come back some day.
I thank all my friends here at NR and I hope Concordia may help Nova Roma to follow its way long.
Valete optime bene.
Titus Arminius Genialis.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37146 From: marciusfelix Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Cato and Calendar
Salve, Cato et salvete, omnes:

The postagem of its calendar is a beautiful work.
Please, continues with the postagens.

Vale.
Titus Marcius Felix
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37147 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Some thoughts about eliminating the Constitution
Greetings

Well, I think I shall share some thoughts on the new (and surely
interesting) topic of discussion of these days.

So, eradicating the Constitution. One question coming to mind right
away is: considering every single magistrate of Nova Roma did swear
and will swear untill the laws have changed to defend teh Constitutio
of Nova Roma, how exactly one goes about eliminating it? Because, you
see, the Constitutio states how it can be changed, but eradicating it
is a totally different matter. And I can't see how one can defend and
uphold the Constitutio by proposing it to be eliminated altogether.
I'll make myself even more unpopular than I already am (but who cares,
I've always thought one magistrate has duties, and taking part in
popularity contests is not among those) and go further in stating
that, personally, I think anyone even proposing it for real, beyond a
mere theoretical argument, would fall under the provision of high
treason and should treated accordingly. But that is, of course, would
be a matter for the Praetores and thank goodness I'm not one.

Now, besides that point, there is another consideration that, I think,
must be done. This renewed frontal assault on the Constitution, in my
opinion, stemmed from the fact the Tribunes basically calimed themself
the right of interpreting the Constitutio as an unprescindible mean
and requirement in order to fulfil their duty of vetoing the edicta
and laws going against the Constitutio and its spirit.

Now, I understand that this, which someone, beats me following which
logic, consider an abuse of power, may have caused teh spirits to grow
hotter, but there is a very fundamental point to be taken into
consideration. the Constitutio of Nova Roma is basically something
that draws some limits to the various powers and without that
magistrates, especially the Tribunes, would have more unrestricted and
absolutely indiscriminate power, not less. I do not have to remind you
that Tribunes more antiquo could veto just about anything they felt
like vetoing (Calls of elective comitia included) without having to
give any explaination to anyone.

The truth is that while romans had centuries of traditions and
unspoken, yet binding, rules about the governing of the city (rules
that, even then, sometimes worked so badly to cripple the state), we
do not have those. Hell, we do not even have the very volatile, yet
sometimes decisive, problem of having to look at someone else's eyes
after we take a decision. And you really want to eliminate the system
of check and balances, however imperfect (but perfectible) it may be,
for a total deregulation?

So, the first time a tribunus veto a very good law not because it goes
against the constitution, but just because he doesn't like the
proponent, what shall you do? When a Consul will propose the raise of
Christianity to second "state religion", what will be the principle to
avoid it? What about when a propraetor will decide by edictum that the
taxes of his provincia will indeed stay in their provincia and a
complacent tribunus or two will veto the immediate senatusconsultum
removing him?

The point is, the constitutio gives, you will allow me the expression,
the rules of the game for everyone to follow. Remove it (admitting it
can be legally done, which I doubt) and you will find yourself in a
period of chaos that will disintegrate, not make better, Nova Roma.
After all, the good old mostly unwritten, always changeable mores some
of the de-costitutionalists appeal to must have not been so efficient,
considering the end of the Respublica. Maybe if the tribunes and in
general teh various political organs of nova Roma would had a fixed
set of rules to rule them, things would had gone differently.

Just my two euro-cents.

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis Iterum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37148 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: conventus-photos
AVE MARCE QUIRINE !

Thanks. Nice photos. The journey to Rome and to Ostia it was something
great.

OPTIME VALE,
IVL SABINVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Marcus Quirinus Sulla
<giannidedom@y...> wrote:
> conventus-photos
> You can see the photos of conventus at:
> http://photos.yahoo.com/giannidedom
> Optime valete
> Marcus Quirinus Sulla
>
http://it.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/giannidedom/album?.dir=/418f&.src=ph&.
tok=phmsHeDBxPLapCrU
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37149 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: Some thoughts about eliminating the Constitution
G. Equitius Cato D. Constantino Fusco S.P.D.

Salve tribune.

You wrote,

"One question coming to mind right away is: considering every single
magistrate of Nova Roma did swear and will swear untill the laws have
changed to defend teh Constitutio of Nova Roma, how exactly one goes
about eliminating it? Because, you see, the Constitutio states how it
can be changed, but eradicating it is a totally different matter."

Couple of points:

Key phrase: "until[l] the laws have changed"; exactly. It can be done
legally, as the Constitution allows itself to be amended. The
Constitution does NOT put a limit on what can be changed or amended,
and more specifically it does NOT prohibit its own abolishment; it
merely states that the People (and Senate) must vote to ratify any
changes. This actually highlights one of the main courses of
reasoning behind the desire to abolish it: it gives the right of
self-determination to the People, who make up the res publica. We
would be free from the unhistoric and unmanageable constraints placed
on our system of government by the written Constitution.

A key question is: which is more important, the will of the People or
the directions mandated by a written document? The distinct
differences between our res publica and a political entity such as the
United States, in which the Constitution is regarded with a reverence
bordering on the sacred, is that the governmental, political, and
legal systems in the United States itself were, for all intents and
purposes, created by that document. Our res publica, on the other
hand, was founded around a system of government which existed, in its
entirety, already. The Patres Patriae did not have to invent the
consulship, or praetorship, or tribunate, etc. --- they simply
restored those magistracies in a manner that would try to reflect as
best they could the ancient ones.

And let me make clear that the idea of abolishing the Constitution in
no way whatsoever decreases or attempts to decrease the honor due the
Patres Patriae; we have simply evolved to a point where the res
publica can manage itself in a way that would reflect to an even
greater extent the ancient one. The Patres Patriae, having been born
into and living within a governmental system in which that written
document is so venerated probably, like most citizens of the U.S.
would, felt that a written constitution was self-evidently necessary.

As far as the idea that abolishing the Constitution would somehow
support endangering the religio, that is, I think, a "threat" that is
unfounded and should be dismissed outright. We live in a res publica
in which the practice and teaching of the religio is as fundamental as
the consulship. It simply is, and it shall remain that way.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37150 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: Some thoughts about eliminating the Constitution
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
<dom.con.fus@g...> wrote:
> Greetings
>
> Well, I think I shall share some thoughts on the new (and surely
> interesting) topic of discussion of these days.
>
> So, eradicating the Constitution. One question coming to mind right
> away is: considering every single magistrate of Nova Roma did swear
> and will swear untill the laws have changed to defend teh
Constitutio
> of Nova Roma, how exactly one goes about eliminating it? Because,
you
> see, the Constitutio states how it can be changed, but eradicating
it
> is a totally different matter. And I can't see how one can defend
and
> uphold the Constitutio by proposing it to be eliminated altogether.
> I'll make myself even more unpopular than I already am (but who
cares,
> I've always thought one magistrate has duties, and taking part in
> popularity contests is not among those) and go further in stating
> that, personally, I think anyone even proposing it for real,
beyond a
> mere theoretical argument, would fall under the provision of high
> treason and should treated accordingly. But that is, of course,
would
> be a matter for the Praetores and thank goodness I'm not one.
>


Salvete omnes,

"So, eradicating the Constitution. One question coming to mind right
away is: considering every single magistrate of Nova Roma did swear
and will swear untill the laws have changed to defend teh Constitutio
of Nova Roma, how exactly one goes about eliminating it? Because, you
see, the Constitutio states how it can be changed, but eradicating it
is a totally different matter. And I can't see how one can defend and
uphold the Constitutio by proposing it to be eliminated altogether.
I'll make myself even more unpopular than I already am (but who
cares,..."


Salvete omnes,

Yes, I have taken the oath three times and would feel very
uncomfortable helping to dismantle the constitution. That is why I
chose not to even discuss the feasability of removing it over the
last several days. Though it might be a bitter pill for some
citizens to swallow, Domitius Constantinius Fuscus is correct in his
observation above in my opinion and for me, that ends the argument
once and for all for elected magistrates.

Having said that, there is nothing wrong with improving and making
ammendments as time goes on.

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37151 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers" (WAS: REPORT of the SENATESESSION)
In a message dated 8/16/2005 4:24:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
a_apollonius_cordus@... writes:
So, discouraging though it may seem, it's actually a
great advance to have reached a conversation like the
current one which runs something like:
"Let's get rid of the rigid constitution."
"That would be difficult."

As I mentioned to Apollonius privately, I do not think this can happen.

First any elected magistrate cannot engage in any such activity,
it would be sedation, since the Constitution is Nova Roma, and all
swear an oath to protect it. Eliminating it is not protecting it.

That means that only the people can take part in a discussion.
Not a lot is going to be done, and worse the Praetors could zealously
prosecute them for sedation.

So this best left as a theoretical discussion.

In theory we can't replace the Constitution. In theory we can amend it, so
it drifts closer
to your flexible model. We would just have to change passages in the written
document
so the leges have the primacy clause, and not the document.

I see two problems with this. First. Anytime someone did not like a law
passed by a
predecessor he would change it. This means the Populaces' attitude towards
leges would have to change. They would have to study the lex carefully and
vote with convection and not rubber stamp it. Frankly and this is no
disrespect to all the people here, I haven't seen it happen yet. Most do not even want
to be involved in the law making decisions here in Nova Roma. Rather they
are more like members of the Principate then Republic.

Second. I remember how screaming fights used to paralyze the Republic when
we first started.
I suspect when a lex that is very important to its patron and his supporters
is rejected, he will rework it and put it up again. This will mean we will be
caught in a voting loop. Right now the Constitution prevents that, setting
out the rights and saying what can and cannot be done.

Just some things to ponder as we continue this theoretical discussion.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37152 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Pictures from the Conventus #2
avete omnes,

I've just added other pictures at:

http://it.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/m_iulius/album?.dir=/fc46&.src=ph


new:

pic 030: tired at the feet of the Theatrum Marcelli (on the very
first day!)

pic 024: Spanish guys beneath the Dioscurs on the Capitol Hill

pic 041: a last shot before entering Campo dei Fiori (and on the
Theathurm Pompeii basements)

pic 077: Dies Romanus: welcome toast (and water melon with red-
wine) ;-)


old:

> 117: NovaRomans off the sacred wood of Nymph Egeria, whist the
shape
> of Volcano Latialis is i the background
>
> 120: stop talking about politics, we're approching the great
> acqueduct of Appius Claudius
>
> 161: NovaRomans: too tired...the Tomb of Cecilia Metella can wait
> half an hour ;-)
>
> 128: Cato leads the group on the Appian Way, carefully cheking the
> flagstones ;-)
>
> 135: <<Am I or not the Sr Consul?>>
>
> 090: paying respect to the temple of Deus Redicolus (God of Good
> Return) ...for a new come to Rome soon.. I know, I know...this is
> Annia Regilla Sepulcher..... eh eh
>

valete
M IVL PERVSIANVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37153 From: Marcus Quirinus Sulla Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: photo conventus II posting
photo conventus II posting
Photos Marci Quirini Sullae
II post at:
Casale Giovio
dinner "ai spaghettari"
http://it.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/giannidedom/album?.dir=/f528&.src=ph&.tok=phbvOeDBnLiBV7dz




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37154 From: quintuscassiuscalvus Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: "Laws and lawyers"
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato Gn. Equitio Marino Censore Q. Cassio Calvo T.
Galerio
> Paulino quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>> Calvus, if we decided to change the state in which we are
> incorporated, it is possible (and legal) for us to transfer our
assets
> in their entirety; but you are absolutely correct in that we must, by
> necessity, be incorporated *somewhere* to do so.
>

Salve,

I was refering only to the dissolution of Nova Roma as a non-profit
corporation and operating as a non-incorporated entity as was
suggested by Cordus. Under that scenario Nova Roma would have to hand
over all her assets (after paying off any outstanding financial
obligations)to another non-profit, I can't see the Senate voting to
dis-incorporate as a non-profit as there is nothing to gain and quite
literally everything to lose by such a move. Not to mention the
argument that would ensue over what non-profit(s) should profit from
Nova Roma's dissolution.

Incorporating in another state and transfer of assets is another
story. Actually it would be a sequel as Nova Roma was originally
incorporated in New Hampshire and moved to Maine. The real bear in
moving to another state with less restrictive corporate laws would be
finding an honest and reliable agent in that state. I'd recommend
Delaware or Nevada as being the most laissez-faire when it comes to
corporate laws. One of the last places Nova Roma should ever consider
incorporation in is Massachusetts!

Vale,

Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37155 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: Pictures from the Conventus #2
Salve Marce Iuli,

Would it be possible to have the names of the people in the pictures
added to the captions? While I recognize a few people in these images,
I'd really like to know who everyone is.

Vale,

-- Marinus

Marcus Iulius Perusianus wrote:

> avete omnes,
>
> I've just added other pictures at:
>
> http://it.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/m_iulius/album?.dir=/fc46&.src=ph
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37156 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-08-16
Subject: Re: Some thoughts about eliminating the Constitution
A. Apollonius Domitio Constantino omnibusque sal.

Salve Fusce. It was nice to meet you, though only
briefly.

> So, eradicating the Constitution.

Yes please. ;)

> ... One question
> coming to mind right
> away is: considering every single magistrate of Nova
> Roma did swear
> and will swear untill the laws have changed to
> defend teh Constitutio
> of Nova Roma, how exactly one goes about eliminating
> it? Because, you
> see, the Constitutio states how it can be changed,
> but eradicating it
> is a totally different matter. And I can't see how
> one can defend and
> uphold the Constitutio by proposing it to be
> eliminated altogether.

Well, it's interesting to note that the constitution
doesn't place any limit on the type or extent of
constitutional amendments which can be made. There is
no support in the wording of the constitution itself
for any idea that an amendment repealing the whole
constitution would be any different from repealing a
part of it. There is, indeed, nothing at all in the
constitution which suggests that the constitution
intends it to be impossible for the constitution to be
amended out of existence.

You suggest that amending the constitution so that it
ceases to exist is somehow qualitatively different
from amending the constitution so that some parts of
it cease to exist. How exactly does this idea work,
then? Is it unconstitutional to amend the constitution
to remove the first letter of the first word of clause
II.D.5.a? Is it unconstitutional to remove the first
word of clause II.D.5.a? To remove the whole of clause
II.D.5.a? To remove the whole of clause II.D.5? To
remove the whole of clause II.D? To remove the whole
of article II? To remove all the articles apart from
article II? To remove everything apart from article
II.D? To remove everything apart from II.D.5? To
remove everything apart from II.D.5.a? To remove
everything apart from the first word of II.D.5.a? To
remove everything apart from the first letter of
II.D.5.a?

It's a bit arbitrary, isn't it? Any criteria you can
come up with to separate acceptable amendments from
unacceptable amendments is going to be arbitrary and
open to question. If you say that any amendment to
remove more than 50% of the constitution is
unconstitutional, I'll suggest we remove half, then
half of the remaining half, then half of the remaining
quarter, the half of the remaining eighth, and so on
until we have only one letter left. In fact all that
would be needed to remove the supremacy of the
constitution would be the removal of about 150 words
from article I of the constitution. Are you going to
say that any constitutional amendment is acceptable
except that specific amendment? Then I'll suggest a
constitutional amendment to insert a clause saying
that those 150 words may be removed.

This is the essence of a democratic constitution:
provided the proper legal procedures are followed, the
legislative body may do anything it wishes, including
abolishing the constitution. A constitution which
cannot be abolished by democratic processes is not a
democratic constitution.

> I'll make myself even more unpopular than I already
> am (but who cares,
> I've always thought one magistrate has duties, and
> taking part in
> popularity contests is not among those) and go
> further in stating
> that, personally, I think anyone even proposing it
> for real, beyond a
> mere theoretical argument, would fall under the
> provision of high
> treason and should treated accordingly. But that is,
> of course, would
> be a matter for the Praetores and thank goodness I'm
> not one.

Ah, it's been a while since I was accused of a serious
criminal offence. I think the last time was a couple
of years ago when Decius Junius accused me and my
colleagues of attempting to rig the electoral system
in our own favour. I made quite a stink about it and
insisted on an apology. The thing about that, of
course, was that there was a danger that people would
believe him. There's no such danger in this case,
because I can simply point out the last sentence of
clause XXI.C (treason) of the lex poenalis: "No one
shall be prosecuted under this offence for any
legislative proposal or peaceful attempt to reform the
State by means of legislation".

> Now, besides that point, there is another
> consideration that, I think,
> must be done. This renewed frontal assault on the
> Constitution, in my
> opinion, stemmed from the fact the Tribunes
> basically calimed themself
> the right of interpreting the Constitutio as an
> unprescindible mean
> and requirement in order to fulfil their duty of
> vetoing the edicta
> and laws going against the Constitutio and its
> spirit.

As far as I'm concerned, no, it didn't. I've argued
consistently for the repeal of the constitution for
several years. I repeat the argument whenever the
opportunity seems to present itself.

> Now, I understand that this, which someone, beats me
> following which
> logic, consider an abuse of power, may have caused
> teh spirits to grow
> hotter, but there is a very fundamental point to be
> taken into
> consideration. the Constitutio of Nova Roma is
> basically something
> that draws some limits to the various powers and
> without that
> magistrates, especially the Tribunes, would have
> more unrestricted and
> absolutely indiscriminate power, not less. I do not
> have to remind you
> that Tribunes more antiquo could veto just about
> anything they felt
> like vetoing (Calls of elective comitia included)
> without having to
> give any explaination to anyone.

Actually the ancient tribunes were subject to much
tighter restrictions than our current tribunes are.
They could not veto enacted leges. They could not veto
legislative proposals except on very specific grounds.
They could not veto legislative proposals before the
people had been given an adequate opportunity to
discuss the proposals. And so on.

In fact the current constitution is utterly unable to
restrain the powers of the magistrates, and we have
observed this recently. You and your colleagues have
acted as you thought best, and in accordance with your
interpretation of the constitution. I support your
right to do that, but many people consider that you
have acted unconstitutionally and exceeded your
constitutional powers. But there is nothing they can
do about it, because the constitution provides no
mechanism for challenging your actions which you
yourselves cannot block. Consider, then, what would
have happened if you and your colleagues had
*genuinely* conspired to disobey the constitution and
exceed your powers. Then, as now, no one would have
any power to prevent you doing it. No one restrains
you but yourselves, because you have the de facto
power to impose your interpretation of the
constitution on everyone else, and if you declare that
the constitution gives you the power to declare
yourselves kings, there is nothing anyone else can do
about it.

So, you see, the current constitution does not place
any restraints on the powers of the tribunes which the
tribunes themselves cannot wilfully ignore if they
want to. The restraints embodied in the constitution
are illusions.

> The truth is that while romans had centuries of
> traditions and
> unspoken, yet binding, rules about the governing of
> the city (rules
> that, even then, sometimes worked so badly to
> cripple the state), we
> do not have those.

This is a superficially appealing but basically
vacuous argument. What made these traditions and rules
"binding"? Nothing except that people chose to obey
them and to condemn anyone who chose to disobey them.
What makes our constitution binding? Nothing except
that people choose to obey it and to condemn anyone
who chooses to disobey it. Our constitution has no
more binding force than those ancient traditions had.
And if we remove the constitution and revert to
traditions, they will have exactly the same binding
force: people will choose to obey them and to condemn
those who choose to disobey. Romans had free will:
they could have chosen to ignore their traditions, but
they didn't, just as we choose not to ignore our
constitution. Exactly the same will be true if we
remove the constitution.

> ... Hell, we do not even have the
> very volatile, yet
> sometimes decisive, problem of having to look at
> someone else's eyes
> after we take a decision. And you really want to
> eliminate the system
> of check and balances, however imperfect (but
> perfectible) it may be,
> for a total deregulation?

The system of checks and balances is nothing to do
with the written constitution. The checks and balances
are composed of the various institutions which
comprise our political system. That system and those
institutions will remain in place with or without the
constitution. The constitution itself does not provide
any checks or balances in itself, it merely states the
existence of checks and balances which will continue
to exist even if we remove the statement that they
exist, just as the sun exists whether we say so or
not.

> So, the first time a tribunus veto a very good law
> not because it goes
> against the constitution, but just because he
> doesn't like the
> proponent, what shall you do?

That could happen now and no one would be able to do
anything about it.

> ... When a Consul will
> propose the raise of
> Christianity to second "state religion", what will
> be the principle to
> avoid it?

The tribunes could choose to veto it or not, as they
please; just as they do now. (And please do not say
that the tribunes are currently required by the
constitution to veto such things, because as I have
already pointed out the tribunes are in practice quite
free to ignore the constitution if they want, as
indeed you yourself have accused past tribunes of
doing.)

> ... What about when a propraetor will decide
> by edictum that the
> taxes of his provincia will indeed stay in their
> provincia and a
> complacent tribunus or two will veto the immediate
> senatusconsultum
> removing him?

This could happen now and no one would be able to do
anything about it.

> The point is, the constitutio gives, you will allow
> me the expression,
> the rules of the game for everyone to follow. Remove
> it (admitting it
> can be legally done, which I doubt) and you will
> find yourself in a
> period of chaos that will disintegrate, not make
> better, Nova Roma.
> After all, the good old mostly unwritten, always
> changeable mores some
> of the de-costitutionalists appeal to must have not
> been so efficient,
> considering the end of the Respublica. Maybe if the
> tribunes and in
> general teh various political organs of nova Roma
> would had a fixed
> set of rules to rule them, things would had gone
> differently.

The constitution gives the rules for everyone to
follow, but following those rules is strictly optional
for those who have the de facto power to get away with
ignoring them. It's not the constitution which
prevents people from ignoring the rules, it's the fact
that the people choose to obey the rules. If people
choose to obey the rules, they will obey them whether
there is a constitution or not. If people choose to
ignore the rules, no constitution will stop them.





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37157 From: Lucius Modius Kaelus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: Salvete and Nemoralia and Vesta
Salve, sacra Lupa.

I've missed our conversations, but I'm glad to hear all is going well
despite the frustrations of registration (which I've only recently
overcome myself).
I've sent you a few messages on Yahoo from time to time since when you
said that you had computer access once again. Get in touch with me; I
think we might have a few things worth discussing.

Vale, in pace deorum;
Kaelus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Samantha" <lucia_modia_lupa@y...>
wrote:
> I apologize for my absence of late, I am having issues with getting
into school
> (who knew transfering was such a pain in the rear). At any rate I
try to check
> my email on a somewhat regular basis though this school thing has been
> taking up all of my internet time that I pay for.
> Regardless I will be making a better attempt to at least answer
private emails
> in a timely manner, and swing by here once in a while, though with
the mass of
> posts here I will probably more then likely just skim until I have
my own
> computer and home internet access *grins*.
>
> I worked a double so my Nemoralia ritual was much smaller then last
year,
> having worked from noon until two am, I was rather exhausted and in
no shape
> to do a full length ritual to the extent that I normally do. As
always on Nemoralia
> I gave gifts that were NOT of animal product on this day, and gifted
as many
> flowers that I could find on my return to my room (not as many as I
would have
> liked). For those who are unaware Nemoralia was on the 13th of this
month.
>
> Also I have been keeping up with my service to Vesta. In my move
down here
> my oil lamp broke, so I have been making do with large candles
encased in
> glass. While I am not permitted where I am at to keep it burning at
all times, It
> is burning at all times that I am home. I may be acquiring room
mates soon, so
> that may make it a little easier to have a flame going more
consistantly. And
> when school starts I will have more hours at home.. albeit doing
homework but
> still home.
>
> Valete
> Lucia Modia Lupa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37158 From: Lucius Modius Kaelus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: incorporate in a state with less ...
I personally have no objection to incorporating in Canada or Europe,
bit I would strongly advise against incorporating in most South
Americans countries, as much of a benefit as it might be to our cives
in Latin America. The political climates in [most] of the countries
there change like the wind, and sometimes the articles of legal
incorporation are not honoured. A friend's father of mine, who
incorporated a charitable organisation in Venezuela, had some
difficulties along these lines: After five years of operation, his
assets were seized and their property liquidated. No explaination was
ever given, and they were most certainly not involved in any illegal
activity. The government effectively stonewalled any legal action they
could take, unfortunately, and they immigrated to the United States
after that.

I'd hate to see that happen to Nova Roma if we became truly successful
in our goals and financially fluent.

~Kaelus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana"
<silvanatextrix@g...> wrote:
> G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Gn. Equitio Marino, T. Galerio
> Paulino omnibusque SPD.
>
> If anyone wants to look at an alternate template for
> a non-profit society's constitution and by-laws, I
> offer the site below.
>
> We just completed the registration of a non-profit fencing
> club in our community (2004). I was responsible for most
> of the set-up paperwork. Yes, there are alot of groups in
> town that are *not* registered (ie incorporated) as non-profit
> societies, and they do alot of great stuff. But they run
> into problems especially around fund-raising, which it seems
> to me Nova Roma does through taxes, the Magna Mater Project,
> etc. Getting insurance may be another hurdle.
>
> The government of British Columbia offers a cookie-cutter
> approach to the process. You have three options for your
> founding documents: 1) write your own document in its
> entirety; 2) use the basic constitution and bylaws provided
> by the provincial government; 3) use the basic document but
> append a list of amendments your society wants, to make the
> generic document fit your society better.
>
> The *Constitution* is a very brief statement that needs to
> contain the name of the proposed society, its purpose, and
> what will happen if it wraps up (closes). That's all.
> Everything else is in the bylaws, which must cover basic
> administrative stuff, like defining membership, defining
> society officers, procedures for elections and meetings,
> etc.
>
> Yes, with the current international climate, this is one
> way to avoid being classified as a "cult", or other
> potentially harmful organization. If Nova Roma is to
> be a reconstruction in the modern world of the best that
> was Roman civilization, incorporation (somewhere)is probably
> essential. "Render unto Caesar . . . ." :-)
>
> WEBSITE:
> Government of British Columbia corporate registries,
> Socities page:
>
> www.fin.gov.bc.ca/registries/corppg/crsocieties.htm
>
> The blurb at the top of the page says:
> "From this page you can download and print to your own printer
> most of the Society Act forms and information packages.
>
> Valete in pace Deorum.
> G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> <gawne@c...> wrote:
> > Salve Tiberi Galeri, et salvete quirites,
> >
> > > Wasn't there a Senate committee/commission set up to look at this
> issue
> > > last year or the year before??
> >
> > There was. I established a commission of Senators and that
> commission did
> > absolutely nothing. Interested parties may check the Tabularium to
> learn the
> > names of those Senatores who were appointed to the incorporation
> commission.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > -- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37159 From: Lucius Modius Kaelus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: Pictures from the Conventus #2
Same here; I only recognise Cato and Livia.

Vale,
Kaelus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@c...>
wrote:
> Salve Marce Iuli,
>
> Would it be possible to have the names of the people in the pictures
> added to the captions? While I recognize a few people in these images,
> I'd really like to know who everyone is.
>
> Vale,
>
> -- Marinus
>
> Marcus Iulius Perusianus wrote:
>
> > avete omnes,
> >
> > I've just added other pictures at:
> >
> > http://it.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/m_iulius/album?.dir=/fc46&.src=ph
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37161 From: Aestiva Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Ant: [Nova-Roma] photo conventus II posting
Ave Marce Quirine,

The photos are realy great!

Vale bene
Aestiva


Marcus Quirinus Sulla <giannidedom@...> schrieb:
photo conventus II posting
Photos Marci Quirini Sullae
II post at:
Casale Giovio
dinner "ai spaghettari"
http://it.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/giannidedom/album?.dir=/f528&.src=ph&.tok=phbvOeDBnLiBV7dz




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------




---------------------------------
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB kostenlosem Speicher

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37162 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: "Latin for the current debate" returns
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

To promote the use of Latin in Nova Roma, to celebrate
my acquisition of a shiny new copy of the Oxford Latin
Dictionary as a birthday present, and to show my
pietas, I'm now reviving a very good idea of clansman
M. Apollonius Formosanus called "Latin for the current
debate". Every so often during a debate or discussion
I'll offer some Latin words and phrases which might be
useful or relevant to the topics at hand. No doubt
other Latinists will sometimes suggest additions,
corrections, or alternative forms.

So, here we go for the discussion about the
constitution. The plural form of a noun is given in
brackets. Footnotes are given in square brackets. The
order of the words in Latin phrases is, of course,
somewhat flexible.


Constitutio (constitutiones) = constitution [1]

Lex de re publica (leges de re publica) = constitution
[1]

Lex constitutiva (leges constitutivae) = constitution
[1]

Constitutio scripta (constitutiones scriptae) =
written constitution

Constitutio lenta (constitutiones lentae) = flexible
constitution (i.e. one which can be changed relatively
easily)

Constitutio firma (constitutiones firmae) = rigid or
entrenched constitution (i.e. one which is very hard
to change)

Delenda est constitutio = the constitution is to be
destroyed [2]

Servanda est constitutio = the constitution is to be
preserved

Lex (leges) = statute [3]

Jus (jures) = law, right, justice [3]

Juris prudens (juris prudentes) = legal expert (legal
experts)

Juris peritus (juris periti) = legal expert (legal
experts)

Juris consultus (juris consulti) = legal adviser
(legal advisers)

Constitutionem interpretari (or legem de re publica
interpretari, legem constitutivam interpretari, &c.) =
to interpret the constitution

Constitutionem interpretor / interpretaris /
interpretatur / interpretamur / interpretamini /
interpretantur = I / you / he / we / you / they
interpret the constitution

Societas (societates) = corporation

Societas non lucrativa (societates non luctrativae) =
non-profit corporation

Vectigal (vectigales) = tax

Vectigalis causa = because of taxes / for tax purposes

Tabulae societatis = articles of incorporation

Majestas = treason [4]

Crimen majestatis = treason




And, as a special bonus, here are some useful words
and phrases for debates of all kinds:


Mea sententia = in my opinion

Fusco adsentior / assentior / assentio = I agree with
Fuscus

Catoni omnino adsentior / assentior / assentio = I
completely agree with Cato

Cordo dissentio = I disagree with Cordus

Tibi adsentior / assentior / assentio = I agree with
you (singular)

Vobis dissentio = I disagree with you (plural)

Recte dicis = you (singular) are right [5]

Recte dicitis = you (plural) are right [5]

Omnes erratis = you're all wrong

Omnino erras = you (singular) are completely wrong

Sane = yes, certainly

Minime = no, not at all

De alia re agamus = let's talk about something else

Tace Corde! = Cordus, shut up!




Footnotes:

[1] In ancient Latin the word "constitutio" referred
to the system of government, not to the legal document
describing the system, because of course the Romans
had no lega document which described their system of
government. For this reason some people (notably
myself) have some hesitation about using "constitutio"
in this sense and prefer "lex de re publica",
("statute concerning the republic") or "lex
constitutiva" ("constitutive statute").

[2] Adapted by C. Equitius Cato from M. Porcius Cato
censorius, "Delenda est Carthago", quoted in Plinius
major (Pliny the Elder), Naturalis Historia (Natural
History) 15.74.

[3] A lex is a statute enacted by one of the comitia
(assmeblies). Jus is law in the abstract sense, i.e.
the whole set of statutes, edicts, customs, &c.

[4] A shortened form of "majestas populi Romani
minuta", meaning "diminution of the majesty of the
Roman people".

[5] Literally "you speak correctly".



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37163 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: The Calendar Source Material
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

First of all, thank you for the kind remarks made about the posting of
the calendar; I do enjoy it and will continue to do so.

Of course, I must acknowledge that by no means do I have nearly enough
of this information bouncing around in my head randomly, and in order
to make sure my information is correct I use sources directly; often
basically using the "cut and paste" method in order to provide the
most accurate and sensible information, and only adding commentary of
my own in clarification.

Now, very importantly, there recently arose a question regarding the
source materials that I look through and use for the daily postings.
When I first started out, I listed several sources, and since then
have only very rarely acknowledged them individually.

To be completely safe, I have written to the sources (like the
Encyclopedia Mythica) that I use and made sure that they know I am
doing so if necessary (i.e., the information is not in the public
domain), and have received their permission to simply reference them
in a general list of sources rather than each one individually.

I am, however, creating a permanent file to be placed in our archives
which will list in detail each source from which I take information,
and any website links available; often I bounce from link to link
searching for the clearest and most manageable information, but there
are e few which are constant. Once this file is created, all citizens
can access it and delve further if they wish.

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37164 From: Appia Claudia Laterana Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: The Calendar Source Material
Ave, Cato!

Thank you.

Vale,
Ap. Claudia Laterana.

gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> escreveu:
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

First of all, thank you for the kind remarks made about the posting of
the calendar; I do enjoy it and will continue to do so.

Of course, I must acknowledge that by no means do I have nearly enough
of this information bouncing around in my head randomly, and in order
to make sure my information is correct I use sources directly; often
basically using the "cut and paste" method in order to provide the
most accurate and sensible information, and only adding commentary of
my own in clarification.

Now, very importantly, there recently arose a question regarding the
source materials that I look through and use for the daily postings.
When I first started out, I listed several sources, and since then
have only very rarely acknowledged them individually.

To be completely safe, I have written to the sources (like the
Encyclopedia Mythica) that I use and made sure that they know I am
doing so if necessary (i.e., the information is not in the public
domain), and have received their permission to simply reference them
in a general list of sources rather than each one individually.

I am, however, creating a permanent file to be placed in our archives
which will list in detail each source from which I take information,
and any website links available; often I bounce from link to link
searching for the clearest and most manageable information, but there
are e few which are constant. Once this file is created, all citizens
can access it and delve further if they wish.

Valete bene!

Cato




SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------



__________________________________________________
Converse com seus amigos em tempo real com o Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.download.yahoo.com/messenger/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37165 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: "Latin for the current debate" returns
Scholastica Cordo quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque omnibus S.P.D.

Corde mi amice, vocabula 'ius' et 'vectigal' generis neutri sunt, ergo
pluralia sunt 'iura' et 'vectigalia.'

[Cordus, my friend, the words 'ius' and 'vectigal' are neuter, therefore
their plurals are 'iura' and 'vectigalia.']

> A. Apollonius omnibus sal.
>
> To promote the use of Latin in Nova Roma, to celebrate
> my acquisition of a shiny new copy of the Oxford Latin
> Dictionary as a birthday present, and to show my
> pietas, I'm now reviving a very good idea of clansman
> M. Apollonius Formosanus called "Latin for the current
> debate". Every so often during a debate or discussion
> I'll offer some Latin words and phrases which might be
> useful or relevant to the topics at hand. No doubt
> other Latinists will sometimes suggest additions,
> corrections, or alternative forms.

This is very helpful--and a good step forward.
>
> So, here we go for the discussion about the
> constitution. The plural form of a noun is given in
> brackets. Footnotes are given in square brackets. The
> order of the words in Latin phrases is, of course,
> somewhat flexible.
>
>
> Constitutio (constitutiones) = constitution [1]
>
> Lex de re publica (leges de re publica) = constitution
> [1]
>
> Lex constitutiva (leges constitutivae) = constitution
> [1]
>
> Constitutio scripta (constitutiones scriptae) =
> written constitution
>
> Constitutio lenta (constitutiones lentae) = flexible
> constitution (i.e. one which can be changed relatively
> easily)
>
> Constitutio firma (constitutiones firmae) = rigid or
> entrenched constitution (i.e. one which is very hard
> to change)
>
> Delenda est constitutio = the constitution is to be
> destroyed [2]
>
> Servanda est constitutio = the constitution is to be
> preserved
>
> Lex (leges) = statute [3]
>
> Jus (jures) = law, right, justice [3]

Sed perperam; pluralia 'iura,' non 'iures.' [the plural is 'iura,' not
'iures' as this is a neuter noun]
>
> Juris prudens (juris prudentes) = legal expert (legal
> experts)
>
> Juris peritus (juris periti) = legal expert (legal
> experts)

Both of the above would be what we would term a lawyer or attorney.
>
> Juris consultus (juris consulti) = legal adviser
> (legal advisers)
>
> Constitutionem interpretari (or legem de re publica
> interpretari, legem constitutivam interpretari, &c.) =
> to interpret the constitution
>
> Constitutionem interpretor / interpretaris /
> interpretatur / interpretamur / interpretamini /
> interpretantur = I / you / he / we / you / they
> interpret the constitution
>
> Societas (societates) = corporation
>
> Societas non lucrativa (societates non luctrativae) =
> non-profit corporation

I think you have a typo here in the plural--'lucrativae' not
'luctrativae.'
>
> Vectigal (vectigales) = tax

Iterum perperam; pluralia sunt 'vectigalia.' [Again this is wrong; the
plural is 'vectigalia' as this is also a neuter word]

>
> Vectigalis causa = because of taxes / for tax purposes
>
Or we could possibly use the plural, 'vectigalium.'

> Tabulae societatis = articles of incorporation
>
> Majestas = treason [4]
>
> Crimen majestatis = treason
>
>
>
>
> And, as a special bonus, here are some useful words
> and phrases for debates of all kinds:
>
>
> Mea sententia = in my opinion
>
> Fusco adsentior / assentior / assentio = I agree with
> Fuscus
>
> Catoni omnino adsentior / assentior / assentio = I
> completely agree with Cato

Another way is 'plane assentior,' 'clearly, I agree...'
>
> Cordo dissentio = I disagree with Cordus
>
> Tibi adsentior / assentior / assentio = I agree with
> you (singular)
>
> Vobis dissentio = I disagree with you (plural)
>
> Recte dicis = you (singular) are right [5]
>
> Recte dicitis = you (plural) are right [5]
>
> Omnes erratis = you're all wrong
>
> Omnino erras = you (singular) are completely wrong
>
> Sane = yes, certainly
>
> Minime = no, not at all
>
> De alia re agamus = let's talk about something else
>
> Tace Corde! = Cordus, shut up!
>
>
>
>
> Footnotes:
>
> [1] In ancient Latin the word "constitutio" referred
> to the system of government, not to the legal document
> describing the system, because of course the Romans
> had no lega document which described their system of
> government. For this reason some people (notably
> myself) have some hesitation about using "constitutio"
> in this sense and prefer "lex de re publica",
> ("statute concerning the republic") or "lex
> constitutiva" ("constitutive statute").
>
> [2] Adapted by C. Equitius Cato from M. Porcius Cato
> censorius, "Delenda est Carthago", quoted in Plinius
> major (Pliny the Elder), Naturalis Historia (Natural
> History) 15.74.
>
> [3] A lex is a statute enacted by one of the comitia
> (assmeblies). Jus is law in the abstract sense, i.e.
> the whole set of statutes, edicts, customs, &c.
>
> [4] A shortened form of "majestas populi Romani
> minuta", meaning "diminution of the majesty of the
> Roman people".
>
> [5] Literally "you speak correctly".
>
And often abbreviated simply as 'recte.'

Vale, et valete,

Aula Tullia Scholastica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37166 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: "Latin for the current debate" returns
Quidnam? A Apolloni Corde! - aliquis £CCXXXV in OLD tibi insumpsit?!! Quam
felicem hominem!



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of A. Apollonius Cordus
Sent: 17 August 2005 16:09
To: Main List
Subject: [Nova-Roma] "Latin for the current debate" returns



A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

To promote the use of Latin in Nova Roma, to celebrate
my acquisition of a shiny new copy of the Oxford Latin
Dictionary as a birthday present, and to show my
pietas, I'm now reviving a very good idea of clansman
M. Apollonius Formosanus called "Latin for the current
debate". Every so often during a debate or discussion
I'll offer some Latin words and phrases which might be
useful or relevant to the topics at hand. No doubt
other Latinists will sometimes suggest additions,
corrections, or alternative forms.

So, here we go for the discussion about the
constitution. The plural form of a noun is given in
brackets. Footnotes are given in square brackets. The
order of the words in Latin phrases is, of course,
somewhat flexible.


Constitutio (constitutiones) = constitution [1]

Lex de re publica (leges de re publica) = constitution
[1]

Lex constitutiva (leges constitutivae) = constitution
[1]

Constitutio scripta (constitutiones scriptae) =
written constitution

Constitutio lenta (constitutiones lentae) = flexible
constitution (i.e. one which can be changed relatively
easily)

Constitutio firma (constitutiones firmae) = rigid or
entrenched constitution (i.e. one which is very hard
to change)

Delenda est constitutio = the constitution is to be
destroyed [2]

Servanda est constitutio = the constitution is to be
preserved

Lex (leges) = statute [3]

Jus (jures) = law, right, justice [3]

Juris prudens (juris prudentes) = legal expert (legal
experts)

Juris peritus (juris periti) = legal expert (legal
experts)

Juris consultus (juris consulti) = legal adviser
(legal advisers)

Constitutionem interpretari (or legem de re publica
interpretari, legem constitutivam interpretari, &c.) =
to interpret the constitution

Constitutionem interpretor / interpretaris /
interpretatur / interpretamur / interpretamini /
interpretantur = I / you / he / we / you / they
interpret the constitution

Societas (societates) = corporation

Societas non lucrativa (societates non luctrativae) =
non-profit corporation

Vectigal (vectigales) = tax

Vectigalis causa = because of taxes / for tax purposes

Tabulae societatis = articles of incorporation

Majestas = treason [4]

Crimen majestatis = treason




And, as a special bonus, here are some useful words
and phrases for debates of all kinds:


Mea sententia = in my opinion

Fusco adsentior / assentior / assentio = I agree with
Fuscus

Catoni omnino adsentior / assentior / assentio = I
completely agree with Cato

Cordo dissentio = I disagree with Cordus

Tibi adsentior / assentior / assentio = I agree with
you (singular)

Vobis dissentio = I disagree with you (plural)

Recte dicis = you (singular) are right [5]

Recte dicitis = you (plural) are right [5]

Omnes erratis = you're all wrong

Omnino erras = you (singular) are completely wrong

Sane = yes, certainly

Minime = no, not at all

De alia re agamus = let's talk about something else

Tace Corde! = Cordus, shut up!




Footnotes:

[1] In ancient Latin the word "constitutio" referred
to the system of government, not to the legal document
describing the system, because of course the Romans
had no lega document which described their system of
government. For this reason some people (notably
myself) have some hesitation about using "constitutio"
in this sense and prefer "lex de re publica",
("statute concerning the republic") or "lex
constitutiva" ("constitutive statute").

[2] Adapted by C. Equitius Cato from M. Porcius Cato
censorius, "Delenda est Carthago", quoted in Plinius
major (Pliny the Elder), Naturalis Historia (Natural
History) 15.74.

[3] A lex is a statute enacted by one of the comitia
(assmeblies). Jus is law in the abstract sense, i.e.
the whole set of statutes, edicts, customs, &c.

[4] A shortened form of "majestas populi Romani
minuta", meaning "diminution of the majesty of the
Roman people".

[5] Literally "you speak correctly".



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo!
Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com



SPONSORED LINKS


Ancient
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=F
all+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+roman+empire&c=3&s=73&.sig=WUTlMtENoMRB6MOID9
-IPQ> history

Fall
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+his
tory&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+roman+empire&c=3&s=73&.sig=7ZPJH_Xak
fyQXSLqXlFYDQ> of the roman empire

The
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=
Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+roman+empire&c=3&s=73&.sig=EupvctrPtcX3_ywoe
bvYDQ> roman empire



_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37167 From: Cnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: LEO GENN CENTENARY - Leo Genn was born 100 years ago
Salvete, Quo Vadis-fans!

I am glad to see Leo Genn was worthily commemorated in Nova Roma!
Thank you all for answering this message.
If there is anybody who doesn't see the Leo Genn Centenary Website,
you are welcome to visit:

http://leogenn100.iweb.hu/


Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
propraetor Pannoniae
accensus
scriba


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
> Salve Corneli Lentele,
>
> Thank you for the reminder on the anniversary of this great actor.
> Quo Vadis was one of the first movies about Rome that I saw as a
> child. Genn's role as Petronius was just priceless and when I watch
> this movie that I have in my collection off and on, I see he really
> outshone the other actors save Peter Ustinov.
>
> LOL, I always wished that I could have owned his Hispanic slave girl
> in that movie. I was attracted to her long before I reached puberty
> and never forgot about her until I fell in love with Haley Mills in
> the early 60's!
>
> Regards,
>
> QLP
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
> <cn_corn_lent@y...> wrote:
> > SALVETE, QUIRITES!
> >
> > I have to write today about my best movie-hero, Leo
> > Genn, because his activity was close to our common
> > passion (starring in many films about ancient Rome,
> > e.g. QUO VADIS); and because I can partly thank him
> > that I am here in Nova Roma and the Propraetor of
> > Pannonia.
> >
> > The 100th Anniversary of the birth of Leo Genn is
> > today, on 9th August 2005. We who love Leo must
> > commemorate him especially in this singular day when
> > he was burn 100 years ago.
> >
> > If you are curious to know more this great actor,
> > today I have created a new Leo Genn Centenary Website:
> > I wellcome everybody visiting this website (this is
> > under construction but I hope it's usefull):
> >
> > http://www.leogenn100.iweb.hu/
> >
> > I can thank Leo Genn for many things wich changed my
> > life. When I saw "Quo Vadis?" Leo Genn played
> > Petronius in (then I was 12) I was amazed his very
> > Roman character, his elegant style. Through the act of
> > Leo Genn and Sir Peter Ustinov I was enchanted by the
> > world of the ancient Rome, and go on, by the classical
> > literature, arts, history etc. I begun study Latin and
> > Greek, then I became a university student of classical
> > Greek and Roman studies. The most part of my life and
> > of my activities are dedicated to the classical
> > studies, the Roman culture: all that was started by
> > Leo Genn's amazing performance in the "Quo Vadis". So
> > I wouldn't be who I am if Leo Genn wasn't who he was.
> >
> > I hope Leo Genn will be more estimated one day, and
> > there will be allways people Leo Genn can enchant for
> > the eternal human values and the True Art.
> >
> > In these Latin sentences I would like to express my
> > thankfullness to the great and genious actor, Leo
> > Genn, who was born 100 years ago today, and I will
> > pray his genius to call in more and more people for
> > the classical humanity and for our Rome:
> >
> > CN. CORNELIUS LENTULUS PANNONICUS GRATIAS MAXIMAS AGIT
> > DIVO LEONI GENNIO ACTORI, NATO HODIE ANTE 100 ANNOS,
> > PRAECIPUO VIRO BRITANNICO, QUI PETRONIUS IN FILMO "QUO
> > VADIS?" EUM EXCITAVIT, UT ROMAM ET POPULUM ROMANUM
> > REFICI VELLE COEPISSET. EGO NON IS ESSEM, QUI SUM; SI
> > TU NON IS FUISSES, QUI FUISTI. QUARE TIBI, DIVE LEO
> > GENNI ACTOR, EGO AC POPULUS ROMANUS SAEPE SEMPERQUE
> > GRATIAS AGERE DEBEBIMUS AGIMUSQUE. VIVAT GLORIA TUA
> > SEMPER!
> >
> > Ante diem V. Idus Augustas MMDCCLVIII
> >
> > Cn Cornelius Lentulus pius
> > Propraetor Pannoniae
> > Accensus
> > Scriba
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
> > http://mail.yahoo.it
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37168 From: LVCIVS.CASSIVS.BIBACVLVS Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: eradicating the Constitution
I'm new to NOVAROMA, a probational citizen.
Can someone tell me the reason behind eradicating the constitution?
I have never heard of a organization or club without a constitution.
NOVAROMA claims to be a sovereign nation. Can someone please tell me
what nation in the world does not have a constitution? Where would
ancient Roma have been without a constitution? I will tell you where,
they would have been barbarians, and we would never have heard of Rome,
and would not be having this debate because there wouldn't be a
NOVAROMA. Law is the only thing that keeps the peace in a CIVILIZED
nation is the constitution. In the words of the DIVINE AVGVSTVS or
(Caeser Augustus) "PAXROMANA" piece in Rome.

PAXNOVAROMANA
LVCIVS.CASSIVS.BIBACVLVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37169 From: LVCIVS.CASSIVS.BIBACVLVS Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: eradicating the Constitution
I'm new to NOVAROMA, a probational citizen.
Can someone tell me the reason behind eradicating the constitution?
I have never heard of a organization or club without a constitution.
NOVAROMA claims to be a sovereign nation. Can someone please tell me
what nation in the world does not have a constitution? Where would
ancient Roma have been without a constitution? I will tell you where,
they would have been barbarians, and we would never have heard of Rome,
and would not be having this debate because there wouldn't be a
NOVAROMA. Law is the only thing that keeps the peace in a CIVILIZED
nation is the constitution. In the words of the DIVINE AVGVSTVS or
(Caeser Augustus) "PAXROMANA" piece in Rome.

PAXNOVAROMANA
LVCIVS.CASSIVS.BIBACVLVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37170 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: eradicating the Constitution
SAlvete quirites, et salve Luci Cassi,

"LVCIVS.CASSIVS.BIBACVLVS" <rjbehnen@...> writes:

> I'm new to NOVAROMA, a probational citizen.

Welcome to Nova Roma, and to our forum.

> Can someone tell me the reason behind eradicating the constitution?

I appreciate your alarm, however I think that things are not quite so dire as
you seem to fear. Permit me to explain.

Nova Roma has something that Roma Antiqua never had, a rigid written
constitution. The constitution of Nova Roma is modeled on the constitution
of the United States, though it has a great many differences. Like the US
Constitution it is very hard to amend by design.

In Roma Antiqua there never was such a document, though some might argue that
the Twelve Tablets came close. The constitution of the Roman Republic was a
combination of ius (written law) and mos (custom). The written laws all held
the same degree of authority, with no one written law holding supremacy over
any other written laws.

What some people have been discussing recently is the idea of removing the
special status of "supreme law" from the written constitutional law of Nova
Roma, and making it equal in status to all the other laws of Nova Roma. As
far as I know, nobody has seriously suggested that we repeal all of our laws.

My personal opinion on the matter is that Nova Roma needs to retain a written
"supreme law" for some time yet, perhaps twenty five years, until such time
as we build up a body of custom and knowledge that will sustain the Republic
as it has been founded. But I know that others differ.

I hope that makes things clear, and sets your mind at ease.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37171 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: eradicating the Constitution
Salve Luci Cassi Bibacule,

I agree with what you say. I cannot see our constitution being
removed.

In all countries, especially mine (Canada)people get frustrated when
sections of a constitution are used to frustrate or thwart their
particular ideas, beliefs, dreams, lifestyles etc. The first
reaction of some citizens is to remove the constitution but
ultimately it is reviewed, discussed and ammended if need be.

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "LVCIVS.CASSIVS.BIBACVLVS"
<rjbehnen@y...> wrote:
> I'm new to NOVAROMA, a probational citizen.
> Can someone tell me the reason behind eradicating the constitution?
> I have never heard of a organization or club without a
constitution.
> NOVAROMA claims to be a sovereign nation. Can someone please tell
me
> what nation in the world does not have a constitution? Where would
> ancient Roma have been without a constitution? I will tell you
where,
> they would have been barbarians, and we would never have heard of
Rome,
> and would not be having this debate because there wouldn't be a
> NOVAROMA. Law is the only thing that keeps the peace in a CIVILIZED
> nation is the constitution. In the words of the DIVINE AVGVSTVS or
> (Caeser Augustus) "PAXROMANA" piece in Rome.
>
> PAXNOVAROMANA
> LVCIVS.CASSIVS.BIBACVLVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37172 From: Gaius Aemilius Papinianus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: eradicating the Constitution
Salve L. Cassi Bibacule!

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "LVCIVS.CASSIVS.BIBACVLVS"
<rjbehnen@y...> wrote:
> I'm new to NOVAROMA, a probational citizen.
> Can someone tell me the reason behind eradicating the constitution?
> I have never heard of a organization or club without a constitution.
> NOVAROMA claims to be a sovereign nation. Can someone please tell me
> what nation in the world does not have a constitution? Where would
> ancient Roma have been without a constitution?

Well, what if they did not actually have one? Because they did not -
at least not in the modern sense of a WRITTEN constitution, which is
what all this "eradication"-business is about, I think.

So if some citizen are in favor of abandoning the constitutio they
probably refer to the document rather than the set of rules used to
run the NR-state, which might possibly work as well (or bad) without
a lex scripta as it does now.


> I will tell you where,
> they would have been barbarians,

You mean like the English who I understand haven't got a written
constitution either? Barbarians, the lot of them ;) - although
Apollonius might feel otherwise and will, I'm sure, tell us so at
length.

> and we would never have heard of Rome,
> and would not be having this debate because there wouldn't be a
> NOVAROMA. Law is the only thing that keeps the peace in a CIVILIZED
> nation is the constitution.
> In the words of the DIVINE AVGVSTVS or
> (Caeser Augustus) "PAXROMANA" piece in Rome.

Pax vobiscum!
C. Aemilius Papinianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37173 From: Richard Behnen Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: eradicating the Constitution
Thank you for your explanation. From reading some of the emails posted on yahoo groups it
sounded like someone wanted to get rid of the constitution all together. Thank you for insight.

VALE,
Lucius Cassius Bibaculus

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
SAlvete quirites, et salve Luci Cassi,

"LVCIVS.CASSIVS.BIBACVLVS" writes:

> I'm new to NOVAROMA, a probational citizen.

Welcome to Nova Roma, and to our forum.

> Can someone tell me the reason behind eradicating the constitution?

I appreciate your alarm, however I think that things are not quite so dire as
you seem to fear. Permit me to explain.

Nova Roma has something that Roma Antiqua never had, a rigid written
constitution. The constitution of Nova Roma is modeled on the constitution
of the United States, though it has a great many differences. Like the US
Constitution it is very hard to amend by design.

In Roma Antiqua there never was such a document, though some might argue that
the Twelve Tablets came close. The constitution of the Roman Republic was a
combination of ius (written law) and mos (custom). The written laws all held
the same degree of authority, with no one written law holding supremacy over
any other written laws.

What some people have been discussing recently is the idea of removing the
special status of "supreme law" from the written constitutional law of Nova
Roma, and making it equal in status to all the other laws of Nova Roma. As
far as I know, nobody has seriously suggested that we repeal all of our laws.

My personal opinion on the matter is that Nova Roma needs to retain a written
"supreme law" for some time yet, perhaps twenty five years, until such time
as we build up a body of custom and knowledge that will sustain the Republic
as it has been founded. But I know that others differ.

I hope that makes things clear, and sets your mind at ease.

Valete,

-- Marinus




Yahoo! Groups Links








__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37174 From: Richard Behnen Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: eradicating the Constitution
Salute,

Maybe they didn't have a constitution. They must have had some kind of bill of rights or else
what would be the avantage of being a citizen in stead of a foreigner living in Rome. The apostle Paul used his citizenship as a trump card to escape death a few times before he was executed.

Valio,
Lucius Cassius Bibaculus

Gaius Aemilius Papinianus <numerius2002@...> wrote:
Salve L. Cassi Bibacule!

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "LVCIVS.CASSIVS.BIBACVLVS"
wrote:
> I'm new to NOVAROMA, a probational citizen.
> Can someone tell me the reason behind eradicating the constitution?
> I have never heard of a organization or club without a constitution.
> NOVAROMA claims to be a sovereign nation. Can someone please tell me
> what nation in the world does not have a constitution? Where would
> ancient Roma have been without a constitution?

Well, what if they did not actually have one? Because they did not -
at least not in the modern sense of a WRITTEN constitution, which is
what all this "eradication"-business is about, I think.

So if some citizen are in favor of abandoning the constitutio they
probably refer to the document rather than the set of rules used to
run the NR-state, which might possibly work as well (or bad) without
a lex scripta as it does now.


> I will tell you where,
> they would have been barbarians,

You mean like the English who I understand haven't got a written
constitution either? Barbarians, the lot of them ;) - although
Apollonius might feel otherwise and will, I'm sure, tell us so at
length.

> and we would never have heard of Rome,
> and would not be having this debate because there wouldn't be a
> NOVAROMA. Law is the only thing that keeps the peace in a CIVILIZED
> nation is the constitution.
> In the words of the DIVINE AVGVSTVS or
> (Caeser Augustus) "PAXROMANA" piece in Rome.

Pax vobiscum!
C. Aemilius Papinianus






Yahoo! Groups Links







__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37175 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: eradicating the Constitution
Salvete quirites, et salve Bibacule,

Lucius Cassius Bibaculus <rjbehnen@...> writes:

> Maybe they didn't have a constitution. They must have had some kind of bill
> of rights

Not as such, though Roman citizens certainly enjoyed a great many things that
we would call 'rights' today. For example, the iura publica, or public
rights, include the right to vote and the right to stand for elective office,
as well as the right and duty (at least in Roma Antiqua) to provide military
service to the Republic.

But the iura publica were never codified into a single document. They were
the consequence of long practice and custom, and we know what they were
because they got mentioned in the writings of people such as Cicero whose
writings survive to this day. Specific rights are mentioned in various
pieces of legislation, but as far as I know it was all piecemeal. Nobody
ever wrote a Bill of Rights for Roman Citizens.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37176 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Pictures from the Conventus #3
avete Marine omnesque,


of course, I've also added other pictures ;-)

http://it.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/m_iulius/album?.dir=/fc46&.src=ph

pic 016: from left: Publius Flavius Caesar, Serapio, Quirinus Sulla,
Astur, Carmen, Prometheus, Cordus.

pic 050: meeting point at Villa Pamphilj: from left Aestiva who
hides Vesta, his wife who hides Aedilis Sulla, Alectus, Prometheus,
Quirinus Sulla (shoulders), Astur, Carmen, .... Sabinus smoking,
his son in red t-shirt.

pic 078: enetering La caffarella valley, by a sepulcher on Via
Latina. Cordus, Cato,Agricola, Livia and Caesar.

pic 086: inside the little museum of Caffarella Valley with (in
orange) Mario (a friend of Nova Roma Italia association, chief of La
Caffarella Comitee). On the left Serapio, Aestiva, Cordus and Cato.

pic 111: leaving the temple of Deus Redicolus: another from La
Caffarella comitee with the bike talking with Cato. Livia smiles at
the camera: "Caesum!" (right?)

pic 142: dowm from the top of Curiates Tomb, on the Appian Way. From
the top, looking back, Romeo from Dacia, Cordus and Agricola. Then
Livia, Cato, Caesar and Serapio.

pic 129: walking on the Aqua Marcia: Romeo looking backward. Serapio
waving.

pic 194: Livia and Cordus inside Tombe of Cecilia Metella.

pic 030: tired at the feet of the Theatrum Marcelli (on the very
first day!); a lot of people here..

pic 024: Spanish guys beneath the Dioscurs on the Capitol Hill; from
left Astur and Carmen, Laietanus and other Spanish girls

pic 041: a last shot before entering Campo dei Fiori (and on the
Theathurm Pompeii basements); sorry about the names, spanish people
may help me here. I am with the grey t-shirt on the left door, in
the right one Ocatavianus and Sara

pic 077: Dies Romanus: welcome toast (and water melon with red-
wine) ;-) among the others: Marullinus is by the melon with a
whitish t-shirt, then Vesta and wife (italians). In the centre Dr.
Benocci (with Sabinus from Dacia just back) and architech who led
the Casale of Giovio restoration (shirt in orange); Prometheus and
Consul Caesar are by the door.

117: NovaRomans off the sacred wood of Nymph Egeria, whilst the
shape of Volcano Latialis is in the background (first line from
left: Cato, Cordus and Livia; 2nd line Austrian Aestiva and
(probably) Serapio.

120: stop talking about politics, we're approching the great
acqueduct of Appius Claudius (Cato, Serapio and Cordus)

161: NovaRomans: too tired...the Tomb of Cecilia Metella can wait
half an hour ;-) Aestiva and british guys (I beg your pardon for the
names amici...maybe Armoricus and...mmm.. ;-). Then Livia sleeping

218: Cato leads the group on the Appian Way, carefully cheking the
flagstones ;-) Alectus follows (left)

135: <<Am I or not the Sr Consul?>>

090: paying respect to the temple of Deus Redicolus (God of Good
Return) ...for a new come to Rome soon.. I know, I know...this is
Annia Regilla Sepulcher..... eh eh


valete
M IVL PERVSIANVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37177 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: eradicating the Constitution
G. Equitius Cato G. Aemilio Papiniano L. Cassio Bibaculo quiritibusque
S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Bibaculus, as has been pointed out, England does not have a
constitution, yet somehow they hold their country together :-)

No, the abolishment of the Constitution has at its heart the desire to
no longer rely on a "supreme" single legaL document but rather to have
all the law at an equal level. One of the basic reasons for this is
that in order for a document to hold supremacy in legal status there
needs to be kind of check on its power: usually in the form of a
"supreme" or "constitutional" court. That kind of institution is
totally unhistoric, and would draw us further away from the ancient
Republic rather than towards it, which is our goal.

Interesting that Censor Marinus has brought up the Twelve Tables; a
while ago I considered the idea of replacing the Constitution with a
kind of "new" Twelve Tables as the basis of our law, but it was
pointed out to me that if we did so, it would be simply replacing one
"supreme" legal code with a different one, and we still do not have a
supreme court. Even specific laws in the Twelve Tables were
over-ruled by the later laws passed in the ancient Republic (like that
forbidding marriage between patricians and plebs), so the ancients did
not consider the Twelve Tables inviolate from amendment or discard
when necessary.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37178 From: Richard Behnen Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: eradicating the Constitution
Salve,
Cato

England may not have a constitution. However they have written law to guarantee
the rights of citizens. It may not be called a constitution but there is documents
explaining what is expected from the house of commons, the house of lords,
and the people. So did Rome, it may not have been called a constitution, however it was written. I did not realize by the constitution meant a "supreme" single legal document.
Being new to NOVAROMA, like most americans law and constitution are the same.
I'm ignorant on the subject of eradicating the constitution, and thought this meant doing
away with all bylaws or any writtin rules again i do not study law so in my mind rules and
constitution are the same. However now I stand corrected. Thank You.

Vale,
Rich

P.S. Who ever claimed that England was civilized.
(just kidding)

gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
G. Equitius Cato G. Aemilio Papiniano L. Cassio Bibaculo quiritibusque
S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Bibaculus, as has been pointed out, England does not have a
constitution, yet somehow they hold their country together :-)

No, the abolishment of the Constitution has at its heart the desire to
no longer rely on a "supreme" single legaL document but rather to have
all the law at an equal level. One of the basic reasons for this is
that in order for a document to hold supremacy in legal status there
needs to be kind of check on its power: usually in the form of a
"supreme" or "constitutional" court. That kind of institution is
totally unhistoric, and would draw us further away from the ancient
Republic rather than towards it, which is our goal.

Interesting that Censor Marinus has brought up the Twelve Tables; a
while ago I considered the idea of replacing the Constitution with a
kind of "new" Twelve Tables as the basis of our law, but it was
pointed out to me that if we did so, it would be simply replacing one
"supreme" legal code with a different one, and we still do not have a
supreme court. Even specific laws in the Twelve Tables were
over-ruled by the later laws passed in the ancient Republic (like that
forbidding marriage between patricians and plebs), so the ancients did
not consider the Twelve Tables inviolate from amendment or discard
when necessary.

Valete bene,

Cato








Yahoo! Groups Links









---------------------------------
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37179 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-17
Subject: Re: eradicating the Constitution
Richard Behnen <rjbehnen@...> writes:

> P.S. Who ever claimed that England was civilized.
> (just kidding)

Nobody. Everyone knows that the English are civilised.

-- Marinus (drolly)