Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Aug 26-31, 2005

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37362 From: FAC Date: 2005-08-26
Subject: Re: incorporate in a state with less ...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37363 From: FAC Date: 2005-08-26
Subject: Re: Leaving Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37364 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2005-08-26
Subject: Re: Leaving Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37365 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2005-08-26
Subject: Re: Article: Planetarium Highlights Lost Pan-European Faith
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37366 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-27
Subject: a.d. VI Kal. Sept.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37367 From: Gaius Aemilius Papinianus Date: 2005-08-27
Subject: Citizenship test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37368 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-27
Subject: Pan Follow-Up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37369 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-27
Subject: Calendar Sources Redux
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37370 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-08-27
Subject: Re: Citizenship test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37371 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-27
Subject: Re: Citizenship test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37372 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-27
Subject: Re: Calendar Sources Redux
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37373 From: luciusclaudiusromulus Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Is Rome Empty?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37375 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: a.d. V Kal. Sept.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37376 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37377 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37378 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Multae sententiae de constitutione et de lege constitutiva
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37379 From: publiusminius Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37380 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37381 From: Tribune Albucius Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Back in tribunician office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37382 From: marcushoratius Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: a.d. V Kal. Sept.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37383 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: a.d. V Kal. Sept.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37384 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Back in tribunician office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37385 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Multae sententiae de constitutione et de lege constitutiva
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37386 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: feast of Sol and Luna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37387 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Multae sententiae de constitutione et de lege constitutiva
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37388 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: From the Archives of the Sodalis Coq et Coq 5
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37389 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37390 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37391 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37392 From: JOEY NICOLE KING Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Silvae Novam Eboracum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37393 From: JOEY NICOLE KING Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37394 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37395 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37396 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37397 From: Lucius Lusus Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Quot ciues in Nova Roma sunt?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37398 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37399 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37400 From: Legion XXIV Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Legion XXIV Vicesima Quarta Newsletter August 2005
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37401 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Multae sententiae de constitutione et de lege constitutiva
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37402 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37403 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37404 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37405 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37406 From: marcushoratius Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Multae sententiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37407 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: House of Ptolemy (offshoot of 'From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?')
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37408 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37409 From: mfalco1 Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37410 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Rome Mini-series
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37411 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37412 From: mfalco1 Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37413 From: richard france Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37414 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37415 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37416 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Multae sententiae de constitutione et de lege constitutiva
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37417 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Multae sententiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37418 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: House of Ptolemy (offshoot of 'From boy to tyrant...or benefact
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37419 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Sorry for the English mistakes!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37420 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: a.d. IV Kal. Sept.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37421 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Rome Mini-series
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37422 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: House of Ptolemy (offshoot of From boy to tyrant...or benefacto
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37423 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Rome Mini-series
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37424 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37425 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37426 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: House of Ptolemy (offshoot of 'From boy to tyrant...or benefact
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37427 From: M. Fatih Algan Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37428 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37429 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37430 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37431 From: Barry Smith Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Rome Mini-series
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37432 From: Stefanie Beer Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Betreff: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Multae sententiae de constitutione et
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37433 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37434 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Parthia and Sassanid Persia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37435 From: Marcus Traianus Valerius Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37436 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37437 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37438 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37439 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37440 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Betreff: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Multae sententiae de constitutione
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37441 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37442 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37443 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37444 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Parthia and Sassanid Persia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37445 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Parthia and Sassanid Persia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37446 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Parthia and Sassanid Persia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37447 From: mfalco1 Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: House of Ptolemy (offshoot of 'From boy to tyrant...or benefact
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37448 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: House of Ptolemy (offshoot of 'From boy to tyrant...or benefact
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37449 From: c_fabia_livia@yahoo.co.uk Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Ludi Romani
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37450 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: FYI: HBO Rome mini-series Yahoogroup found.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37451 From: M. Gladius Agricola Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Our project needs some help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37452 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: a.d III Kal. Sept.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37453 From: C·ARMINIVS·RECCANELLVS Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: Ludi Romani
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37454 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: Ludi Romani
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37455 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: House of Ptolemy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37456 From: Lucius Lusus Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: De precationibus sinceris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37457 From: Marcus Traianus Valerius Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37458 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: Parthia and Sassanid Persia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37459 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: Parthia and Sassanid Persia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37460 From: Tribune Albucius Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION (modified)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37461 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: House of Ptolemy (offshoot of 'From boy to tyrant...or benefact
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37462 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Rome-Total War question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37463 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: House of Ptolemy (offshoot of 'From boy to tyrant...or benefact
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37464 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: House of Ptolemy (offshoot of 'From boy to tyrant...or benefact
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37465 From: James Mathews Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: "Roman Times Quarterly," "Pilum," and "Nova Britannia" Quarterlies
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37466 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2005-08-31
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37467 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-31
Subject: pridie Kal. Sept.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37468 From: Tribune Albucius Date: 2005-08-31
Subject: Report of the Sen. session : some answers, back in office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37469 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-31
Subject: Re: Report of the Sen. session : some answers, back in office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37470 From: Tribune Albucius Date: 2005-08-31
Subject: Re: Report of the Sen. session : some answers, back in office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37471 From: David Coleman Date: 2005-08-31
Subject: NR Religion Inc as Church?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37472 From: David Coleman Date: 2005-08-31
Subject: How to find local citizens?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37473 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-31
Subject: Re: NR Religion Inc as Church?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37474 From: Maior Date: 2005-08-31
Subject: Re: NR Religion Inc as Church?



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37362 From: FAC Date: 2005-08-26
Subject: Re: incorporate in a state with less ...
Salve Paulinus,
I'm studying this opportuniy since a couple of year.
The legal system is quite hard and complicated. The model of
organization would be close to the WWF and other NGOs. Usually there
is an "headquerter" in a Country which cohordinates the local
organizations. In fact legally an organization should register
itself in any Nation. So f.e. there is a local WWF in any Nation
(WWF Italia, WWF France, WWF Brasil, etc.) following the guidelines
indicated by the general headquarter.
I studied any possibility to apply this kind of model to NR.
Unluckly it requires a strong knowledge of any national law about no-
profit organizations, many money to register the organization in any
Nation, etc.
My dream is to transfomr NR in an internationl organization working
in any Nation as the most important group about Ancient Rome. But I
suppose this would be a long-time project and it's only my personal
viwe... ;-)

In any way NR is moving the first step in the "international"
direction. I'm going to propose to the Senatus the creation of a
Bank account in Europe helping the payment of the taxes and the
financements for the citizens living in the Old Continent, East-
Europe, Russia, Mediterranean area, North-Africa. The european bank
account would low the expanses for bank actions erasing the taxes
applied to the movements from USA to the other side of the Ocean.

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Senior Consul

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
> Salvete omnes,
>
> One thing I would like to find out is if there is any way NR could
> incorporate herself in Canada, Europe and South America in order
to
> get a charity type tax number so that non-Americans could donate
and
> recieve tax write offs for their donations. Also the various
Legions
> could do the same. In that way I would be happy to donate a lot
more
> money than I do as would many others. As we found out in other
> organizations, people and sponsers can be very tight fisted when
> there are no write offs.
>
> Gaia Aurelia Falconis Silvana, I see from your note below that you
> are right up on this; do you have any suggestions on how to go
about
> this?
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana"
> <silvanatextrix@g...> wrote:
> > G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Gn. Equitio Marino, T. Galerio
> > Paulino omnibusque SPD.
> >
> > If anyone wants to look at an alternate template for
> > a non-profit society's constitution and by-laws, I
> > offer the site below.
> >
> > We just completed the registration of a non-profit fencing
> > club in our community (2004). I was responsible for most
> > of the set-up paperwork. Yes, there are alot of groups in
> > town that are *not* registered (ie incorporated) as non-profit
> > societies, and they do alot of great stuff. But they run
> > into problems especially around fund-raising, which it seems
> > to me Nova Roma does through taxes, the Magna Mater Project,
> > etc. Getting insurance may be another hurdle.
> >
> > The government of British Columbia offers a cookie-cutter
> > approach to the process. You have three options for your
> > founding documents: 1) write your own document in its
> > entirety; 2) use the basic constitution and bylaws provided
> > by the provincial government; 3) use the basic document but
> > append a list of amendments your society wants, to make the
> > generic document fit your society better.
> >
> > The *Constitution* is a very brief statement that needs to
> > contain the name of the proposed society, its purpose, and
> > what will happen if it wraps up (closes). That's all.
> > Everything else is in the bylaws, which must cover basic
> > administrative stuff, like defining membership, defining
> > society officers, procedures for elections and meetings,
> > etc.
> >
> > Yes, with the current international climate, this is one
> > way to avoid being classified as a "cult", or other
> > potentially harmful organization. If Nova Roma is to
> > be a reconstruction in the modern world of the best that
> > was Roman civilization, incorporation (somewhere)is probably
> > essential. "Render unto Caesar . . . ." :-)
> >
> > WEBSITE:
> > Government of British Columbia corporate registries,
> > Socities page:
> >
> > www.fin.gov.bc.ca/registries/corppg/crsocieties.htm
> >
> > The blurb at the top of the page says:
> > "From this page you can download and print to your own printer
> > most of the Society Act forms and information packages.
> >
> > Valete in pace Deorum.
> > G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> > <gawne@c...> wrote:
> > > Salve Tiberi Galeri, et salvete quirites,
> > >
> > > > Wasn't there a Senate committee/commission set up to look at
> this
> > issue
> > > > last year or the year before??
> > >
> > > There was. I established a commission of Senators and that
> > commission did
> > > absolutely nothing. Interested parties may check the
Tabularium
> to
> > learn the
> > > names of those Senatores who were appointed to the
incorporation
> > commission.
> > >
> > > Valete,
> > >
> > > -- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37363 From: FAC Date: 2005-08-26
Subject: Re: Leaving Nova Roma
Salve Genialis,
I'm very sad to see another citizen leaving NR, I hope, Amice, you
would reconsider your resignation. I wish you good luck inviting you
contact me privatly for any help.

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Seniro Consul



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Titus Arminius Genialis
<tagenialis@y...> wrote:
>
> Salvete L Armini Fauste, M Armini Maior, Caesar F Quintiliane et
omnes
>
> I'm deeply sad to inform that I must leave Nova Roma because I
have no able time to keep my activities here.
>
> Since some months ago, I've been some idle, some away from NR, but
I was always trying to keep informed about what's happening. But now
it's becoming impossible for me to do it.
>
> Thus, I would like to ask you to void any offices (such as
interpreter) I should hold.
>
> I'm going to stop receiving group messages, although I'm not going
to unsubscribe from the groups and I'll not ask annulation of my
citizenship, because I hope I can come back some day.
>
> I thank all my friends here at NR and I hope Concordia may help
Nova Roma to follow its way long.
>
> Valete optime bene.
>
> Titus Arminius Genialis.
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Converse com seus amigos em tempo real com o Yahoo! Messenger
> http://br.download.yahoo.com/messenger/
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37364 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2005-08-26
Subject: Re: Leaving Nova Roma
Salve

Tito Arminio is not resigning, he is only taking a
long leave of absence due to lack of time. He probably
will return some day.

Vale
M.Arminius

--- FAC <sacro_barese_impero@...> escreveu:

> Salve Genialis,
> I'm very sad to see another citizen leaving NR, I
> hope, Amice, you
> would reconsider your resignation. I wish you good
> luck inviting you
> contact me privatly for any help.
>
> Vale
> Fr. Apulus Caesar
> Seniro Consul
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Titus Arminius
> Genialis
> <tagenialis@y...> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete L Armini Fauste, M Armini Maior, Caesar F
> Quintiliane et
> omnes
> >
> > I'm deeply sad to inform that I must leave Nova
> Roma because I
> have no able time to keep my activities here.
> >
> > Since some months ago, I've been some idle, some
> away from NR, but
> I was always trying to keep informed about what's
> happening. But now
> it's becoming impossible for me to do it.
> >
> > Thus, I would like to ask you to void any offices
> (such as
> interpreter) I should hold.
> >
> > I'm going to stop receiving group messages,
> although I'm not going
> to unsubscribe from the groups and I'll not ask
> annulation of my
> citizenship, because I hope I can come back some
> day.
> >
> > I thank all my friends here at NR and I hope
> Concordia may help
> Nova Roma to follow its way long.
> >
> > Valete optime bene.
> > Titus Arminius Genialis.






_______________________________________________________
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Internet rápida e grátis.
Instale o discador agora! http://br.acesso.yahoo.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37365 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2005-08-26
Subject: Re: Article: Planetarium Highlights Lost Pan-European Faith
C. Minucius Hadrianus Quiritibus S.P.D.

Salvete.

While it is interesting that a planetarium would have a presentation on
Mithraism and its connections with astrology, I should point out that
the website the article is on belongs to a "neo-nazi" white supremacist
organization called New Vanguard that promotes a sort of "pan-European"
Aryan racist ideology. I suspect that their interest in Mithras comes
from his "Aryan" Indo-Iranian roots.

Their eligibility statement for membership reads:

"I am a White person of good moral character*, of entirely European
descent, and at least 18 years of age. I believe in National Vanguard's
goal of creating a better world through racial integrity, racial
progress, self-determination, and freedom; and I will support the
efforts of National Vanguard by paying my dues and by volunteering my
efforts as indicated below to reach other White people with our message.

* Persons of Jewish descent, homosexuals or bisexuals, criminals,
persons with a non-White spouse or sexual partner, or persons with more
than an undetectable trace of non-White ancestry are specifically barred
from membership."

Not the sort of organization we would want to be associated with, no
matter how indirectly. I would hope that the individual posting the
article was unaware of the nature of the website he found it on.

If anyone wants the ugly details, just look on:

http://www.nationalvanguard.org/

http://www.natvan.com/

Valete bene,

C. Minucius Hadrianus



Rusty Mason wrote:

>Planetarium Highlights Lost Pan-European Faith
>
>"Family-friendly planetarium show focuses on Mysteries of Mithras,
>Pan-European God sacred to the Roman Legions
>
>"San Jose California's world-famous Rosicrucian Planetarium is
>producing a breath-taking star show examining the astrological beliefs
>of one of the Ancient World's most important faiths, the worship of
>Mithras.
>
>"The God Mithras, originally a Persian Deity, was honored in ..."
>
>Full Article:
>http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=5793
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37366 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-27
Subject: a.d. VI Kal. Sept.
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Today is ante diem VI Kalendas Septembris; the day is Nefastus
Publicus.

"Aegroto, dum anima est, spes esse dicitur." (It is said that for a
sick man, there is hope as long as there is life) - Cicero, Ad Atticum

Today is the festival of the Volturnalia, dedicated to Volturnus, "god
of the waters", god of fountains. Volturnus was a tribal river god,
probably Samnite, who later was identified as the god of the Tiber
river. The Volturnus River, in southern Italy, is named for him.
Volturnus was the father of the goddess Juturna, who was first
identified with a spring in Latium near the Numicus River and later
with a pool near the temple of Vesta in the Forum of Rome. They were
both honored on this day with feasting, wine-drinking, and games.

"Fortunately, with one exception, there was a respite from foreign
war. The colonists of Velitrae, becoming wanton in a time of peace and
in the absence of any Roman army, made various incursions into Roman
territory and began an attack on Tusculum. The citizens, allies of
old, and now citizens, implored help, and their situation moved not
only the senate, but the plebs as well, with a sense of shame. The
tribunes of the plebs gave way and the elections were conducted by an
interrex. The consular tribunes elected were: L. Furius, A. Manlius,
Ser. Sulpicius, Ser. Cornelius, P. and C. Valerius. They did not find
the plebeians nearly so amenable in the enlistment as they had been in
the elections; it was only after a very great struggle that an army
was raised. They not only dislodged the enemy from before Tusculum,
but forced him to take refuge behind his walls. The siege of Velitrae
was carried on with far greater vigour than that of Tusculum had been.
Those commanders who had commenced the investment did not, however,
effect its capture. The new consular tribunes were: Q. Servilius, C.
Veturius, A. and M. Cornelius, Q. Quinctius, and M. Fabius. Even under
these tribunes nothing worth mention took place at Velitrae. At home
affairs were becoming more critical. Sextius and Licinius, the
original proposers of the laws, who had been re-elected tribunes of
the plebs for the eighth time, were now supported by Fabius Ambustus,
Licinius Stolo's father-in-law. He came forward as the decided
advocate of the measures which he had initiated, and whereas there had
at first been eight members of the college of tribunes who had vetoed
the proposals, there were now only five. These five, as usually
happens with men who desert their party, were embarrassed and
dismayed, and defended their opposition by borrowed arguments
privately suggested to them by the patricians. They urged that as a
large number of plebeians were in the army at Velitrae the Assembly
ought to be adjourned till the return of the soldiers, to allow of the
entire body of the plebs voting on matters affecting their interests.
Sextius and Licinius, experts after so many years' practice in the art
of handling the plebs, in conjunction with some of their colleagues
and the consular tribune, Fabius Ambustus, brought forward the leaders
of the patrician party and worried them with questions on each of the
measures they were referring to the people. "Have you," they asked,
"the audacity to demand that whilst two jugera are allotted to each
plebeian, you yourselves should each occupy more than five hundred
jugera, so that while a single patrician can occupy the land of nearly
three hundred citizens, the holding of a plebeian is hardly extensive
enough for the roof he needs to shelter him, or the place where he is
to be buried? Is it your pleasure that the plebeians, crushed by debt,
should surrender their persons to fetters and punishments sooner than
that they should discharge their debts by repaying the principal? That
they should be led off in crowds from the Forum as the property of
their creditors? That the houses of the nobility should be filled with
prisoners, and wherever a patrician lives there should be a private
dungeon?" - Livy, History of Rome 6.36



"Dicunt in tenero gramine pingium
custodes ouium carmina fistula
delectantque deum cui pecus et nigri
colles Arcadiae placent...
Verum pone moras et studium lucri,
nigrorumque memor, dum licet, ignium
misce stultitiam consiliis breuem:
dulce est desipere in loco."

(On the soft grass the keepers of fat flocks
utter songs [to the accompaniment] of the pipe,
and they give delight to the god who is pleased
by herds and the black hills of Arcadia...
But put aside delays and the pursuit of profit,
and mindful of the dark [funeral] fires, while it is
permitted, mix a bit of nonsense with your schemes:
it is sweet on occasion to play the fool) - Horace, Odes 4.12

"Pan curat oues ouiumque magistros" (Pan cares for sheep and their
master) - Vergil, Eclogues 2.33
"Pan deus Arcadiae" (Pan, god of Arcadia) - Op.cit. 10.26

"Among the shepherds, 'twas believed ever,
That not one fleecy lamb which thus did sever
From the white flock, but pass'd unworried
By angry wolf, or pard with prying head,
Until it came to some unfooted plains
Where fed the herds of Pan: ay great his gains
Who thus one lamb did lose...

'O THOU, whose mighty palace roof doth hang
From jagged trunks, and overshadoweth
Eternal whispers, glooms, the birth, life, death
Of unseen flowers in heavy peacefulness;
Who lov'st to see the hamadryads dress
Their ruffled locks where meeting hazels darken;
And through whole solemn hours dost sit, and hearken
The dreary melody of bedded reeds—
In desolate places, where dank moisture breeds
The pipy hemlock to strange overgrowth;
Bethinking thee, how melancholy loth
Thou wast to lose fair Syrinx—do thou now,
By thy love's milky brow!
By all the trembling mazes that she ran,
Hear us, great Pan!'

'Thou, to whom every fawn and satyr flies
For willing service; whether to surprise
The squatted hare while in half sleeping fit;
Or upward ragged precipices flit
To save poor lambkins from the eagle's maw;
Or by mysterious enticement draw
Bewildered shepherds to their path again;
Or to tread breathless round the frothy main,
And gather up all fancifullest shells
For thee to tumble into Naiads' cells,
And, being hidden, laugh at their out-peeping;
Or to delight thee with fantastic leaping,
The while they pelt each other on the crown
With silvery oak apples, and fir cones brown—
By all the echoes that about thee ring,
Hear us, O satyr king!' " - J. Keats, "Endymion"

In ancient Greece, today was celebrated in honor of the god Pan. Pan
is the son of Hermes, and the god of goatherds and shepherds. He is
mostly human in appearance but with goat horns and goat feet. He was
depicted as a satyr with a reed pipe, a shepherd's crook and a branch
of pine or crown of pine needles. He is an excellent musician and
plays the pipes. He is merry and playful frequently seen dancing with
woodland nymphs. He is at home in any wild place but, is favorite is
Arcady, where he was born. He is always in pursuit of one or another
of the nymphs but, always rejected because he is ugly. His name is the
basis for the word "panic"; there are two differing explanations for
this: either he is the source of noises in the woods which frighten
travellers, or it was his shouting and general antics that helped
Iuppiter defeat the Titans. For the Romans, the two divinities of the
woods were Silvanus, "Forester", and Faunus, "Favorer". In Vergil,
Faunus is son of Picus and grandson of Saturn and father (by Marica)
of Latinus. Both he and Silvanus were generally identified with Pan
and were thought to be responsible for strange and sudden sounds in
the woods. Faunus had oracular powers (both Latinus and the second
Roman king, Numa, consulted him), and his consort Fauna was identified
with the Bona Dea, whose worship was only open to women. Faunus as
the direct equivalent of the Arcadian god Pan was worshiped by King
Evander, who came from Arcadia and founded Pallanteum, the first
settlement on the Palatine Hill. His sanctuary was a cave on the
Palatine, called the Lupercal, where the infant Romulus and Remus were
later suckled by the wolf (lupa). In historical times young men ran
around the boundaries of the Palatine near-naked because Faunus had
tried to seduce Omphale when she and Hercules were asleep in the
Lupercal. He did not know that they had exchanged clothes and found
himself attempting to seduce Hercules. After that his followers (the
Luperci) went naked to prevent the repetition of such a painful error.

Valete bene!

Cato


SOURCES

Livy (http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/Livy/Livy06.html), Wikipedia,
Smith's Dictionary
(http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts
/secondary/SMIGRA/home.html)
Roman mythology (http://www.crystalinks.com/romemythology.html), Odes
of Horace (http://www.merriampark.com/horcarm412.htm), John Keats
"Endymion" (http://www.photoaspects.com/chesil/keats/keats6.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37367 From: Gaius Aemilius Papinianus Date: 2005-08-27
Subject: Citizenship test
C. Aemilius Papinianus omnibus salutem!

I tried to have the citizenship-test sent to me yesterday using the
form on the NR cives site, but it didn't work. The mail was returned to
me with the comment "address unknown".

So what do I have to do to take the test?

Valete.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37368 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-27
Subject: Pan Follow-Up
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

I almost forgot one of the most interesting stories about Pan...

"Gods of Hellas, gods of Hellas,
Can ye listen in your silence?
Can your mystic voices tell us
Where ye hide? In floating islands,
With a wind that evermore
Keeps you out of sight of shore? Pan, Pan is dead.

Jove, the right hand is unloaded,
Whence the thunder did prevail,
While in idiocy of godhead
Thou art staring the stars pale!
And thine eagle, blind and old,
Roughs his feathers in the cold. Pan, Pan is dead.

Where, O Juno, is the glory
Of thy regal look and tread?
Will they lay forevermore thee,
On thy dim, straight, golden bed?
Will thy queendom all lie hid
Meekly, under either lid? Pan, Pan is dead.

Ha, Apollo! floats his golden
Hair all mist-like where he stands,
While the Muses hang enfolding
Knee and foot with faint wild hands?
'Neath the clanging of thy bow,
Niobe looked lost as though! Pan, Pan is dead.

Neptune lies beside his trident,
Dull and senseless as a stone;
And old Pluto deaf and silent
Is cast out into the sun:
Ceres smileth stern thereat
"We all now are desolate - Now Pan is dead."

- Elizabeth Barret Browning, "The Dead Pan"



"As for the death among such beings, I have heard the words of a man
who was not a fool nor an impostor. The father of Aemilianus the
orator, to whom some of you have listened, was Epitherses, who lived
in our town and was my teacher in grammar. He said that once upon a
time, in making a voyage to Italy, he embarked on a ship carrying
freight and many passengers. It was already evening when, near the
Echinades Islands, the wind dropped, and the ship drifted near Paxi.
Almost everybody was awake, and a good many had not finished their
after-dinner wine. Suddenly from the island of Paxi was heard the
voice of someone loudly calling Thamus, so that all were amazed.
Thamus was an Egyptian pilot, not known by name even to many on board.
Twice he was called and made no reply, but the third time he answered;
and the caller, raising his voice, said, 'When you come opposite to
Palodes, announce that Great Pan is dead.' On hearing this, all, said
Epitherses, were astonished and reasoned among themselves whether it
was better to carry out the order or to refuse to meddle and let the
matter go. Under the circumstances Thamus made up his mind that if
there should be a breeze, he would sail past and keep quiet, but with
no wind and a smooth sea about the place, he would announce what he
had heard. So, when he came opposite Palodes, and there was neither
wind nor wave, Thamus, from the stern, looking toward the land, said
the words as he had heard them: 'Great Pan is dead.' Even before he
had finished, there was a great cry of lamentation, not of one person,
but of many, mingled with exclamations of amazement. As many persons
were on the vessel, the story was soon spread abroad in Rome, and
Thamus was sent for by Tiberius Caesar. Tiberius became so convinced
of the truth of the story that he caused an inquiry and investigation
to be made about Pan; and the scholars, who were numerous at his
court, conjectured that he was the son born of Hermes and Penelope." -
Plutarch, "The Obsolescence of Oracles", Moralia 419 A-E

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37369 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-27
Subject: Calendar Sources Redux
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes.

It has come to my attention that there is some great concern regarding
the posts of the Calendar in which I used material from the internet
but did *not* cite specific sources.

I am going to remove the Calendar postings up to the point where I
began including individual sources; since I intend to continue the
Calendar, the information will re-appear as the year rolls, only this
time all relevant (i.e., non public domain) sources will be referenced.

Once again, I apologize for having created this issue, and am taking
steps to correct it. It was unintentional, and I hope you will bear
with me.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37370 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-08-27
Subject: Re: Citizenship test
A. Tullia Scholastica C. Aemilio Papiniano quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
omnibus S.P.D.

>C. Aemilius Papinianus omnibus salutem!
>
> I tried to have the citizenship-test sent to me yesterday using the
> form on the NR cives site, but it didn't work. The mail was returned to
> me with the comment "address unknown".

Perhaps it was a glitch. However, our webmaster has left Nova Roma, so
if you addressed him, it might have bounced.
>
> So what do I have to do to take the test?

We have a request for that from you at the censor's office--but one of
our rogatores is in the process of a temporary international move, and some
scribae are still on vacation. If the one to whom you are assigned is away,
or has computer problems (as a couple of them do on a recurrent basis), your
request might not have reached the correct person. I don't have access to
the tests yet.
>
> Valete.

Vale, et valete,

A. Tullia Scholastica


>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37371 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-27
Subject: Re: Citizenship test
Salve,

This will be taken care of immediately.

Vale,

Gn. Equitius Marinus
Censor

Gaius Aemilius Papinianus wrote:
> C. Aemilius Papinianus omnibus salutem!
>
> I tried to have the citizenship-test sent to me yesterday using the
> form on the NR cives site, but it didn't work. The mail was returned to
> me with the comment "address unknown".
>
> So what do I have to do to take the test?
>
> Valete.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37372 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-27
Subject: Re: Calendar Sources Redux
In a message dated 8/27/2005 7:15:36 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
mlcinnyc@... writes:
I am going to remove the Calendar postings up to the point where I
began including individual sources; since I intend to continue the
Calendar, the information will re-appear as the year rolls, only this
time all relevant (i.e., non public domain) sources will be referenced.
Actually, Equitius, you just need to put a disclaimer at the bottom of each
posting.

"Information for this Calendar is drawn from blah bah blah & blah blah blah"

That covers your bottom.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37373 From: luciusclaudiusromulus Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Is Rome Empty?
Salve Roma,
I am Lucius Cladius Romulus, I am in the Eastern Part of TN. I
have been a member for almost two years now, and still have not met
anyone, even in my area, and only two persons have responded to my e-
mails, of which I am gratefull.I love everything ancient Roman, yet
even after joining Nova Roma still do not have anyone to speak with. I
have signed up for several on-line classes from Nova Roma, and still no
replies. What is going on? Is Rome empty?
I am starting to feel all alone here.Did I join a group of stiffs,
people who will not converse with you unless they know you personally
already? I would love to participate in anything Nova Roma has to
offer, get more people to join, ect, but why? Only two people have
bothered to take the time to respond to my questions in two years!Is
this why Rome fell?

Vale,
Lucius Claudius Romulus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37375 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: a.d. V Kal. Sept.
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Today is ante diem V Kalendas Septembris; the day is Comitialis.

"Cito enim arescit lacrima, praesertim in alienis malis." (Tears dry
quickly, especially when they are for others' misfortunes) - Cicero,
De partitione oratoria

"They were denouncing these indignities in the ears of men,
apprehensive for their own safety, who listened to them with stronger
indignation than the men who were speaking felt. They went on to
assert that after all there would be no limit to the seizure of land
by the patricians or the murder of the plebs by the deadly usury until
the plebs elected one of the consuls from their own ranks as a
guardian of their liberties. The tribunes of the plebs were now
objects of contempt since their power was shattering itself by their
own veto. There could be no fair or just administration as long as the
executive power was in the hands of the other party, while they had
only the right of protesting by their veto; nor would the plebs ever
have an equal share in the government till the executive authority was
thrown open to them; nor would it be enough, as some people might
suppose, to allow plebeians to be voted for at the election of
consuls. Unless it was made obligatory for one consul at least to be
chosen from the plebs, no plebeian would ever become consul. Had they
forgotten that after they had decided that consular tribunes should be
elected in preference to consuls in order that the highest office
might be open to plebeians, not a single plebeian was elected consular
tribune for four-and-forty years? What did they suppose? Did they
imagine that the men who had been accustomed to fill all the eight
places when consular tribunes were elected would of their own free
will consent to share two places with the plebs, or that they would
allow the path to the consulship to be opened when they had so long
blocked the one to the consular tribuneship? The people would have to
secure by law what they could not gain by favour, and one of the two
consulships would have to be placed beyond dispute as open to the
plebs alone, for if it were open to a contest it would always be the
prey of the stronger party. The old, oft-repeated taunt could no
longer be made now that there were no men amongst the plebs suitable
for curule magistracies. Was the government carried on with less
spirit and energy after the consulship of P. Licinius Calvus, who was
the first plebeian to be elected to that post, than during the years
when only patricians held the office? Nay, on the contrary, there had
been some cases of patricians being impeached after their year of
office, but none of plebeians. The quaestors also, like the consular
tribunes, had a few years previously begun to be elected from the
plebs; in no single instance had the Roman people had any cause to
regret those appointments. The one thing that was left for the plebs
to strive for was the consulship. That was the pillar, the stronghold
of their liberties. If they arrived at that, the Roman people would
realise that monarchy had been completely banished from the City, and
that their freedom was securely established, for in that day
everything in which the patricians were pre-eminent would come to the
plebs - power, dignity, military glory, the stamp of nobility; great
things for themselves to enjoy, but greater still as legacies to their
children. When they saw that speeches of this kind were listened to
with approval, they brought forward a fresh proposal, viz. that
instead of the duumviri (the two keepers of the Sacred Books) a
College of Ten should be formed, half of them plebeians and half
patricians. The meeting of the Assembly, which was to pass these
measures, was adjourned till the return of the army which was
besieging Velitrae." - Livy, History of Rome 6.37


In ancient Egypt today was celebrated as the Nativity of Nepthys. The
"Mistress of the House" (Nebet-het or Nebt-het in the Egyptian
Language), Nephthys is the "Friend of the Dead," and is first
mentioned in Old Kingdom funerary literature as riding the "night
boat" of the underworld, meeting the deceased king's spirit and
accompanying him into "Lightland." Her hair is metaphorically compared
to the strips of cloth which shroud the bodies of the dead. Nephthys
is almost universally depicted as a woman with the hieroglyphic
symbols of her name (a basket and a house, stacked on top of each
other) situated atop her head, though she can also be depicted as a
bird (most often a kite or some other form of falcon/hawk). She was
associated with funerary rituals throughout ancient Egyptian history
and was venerated not as Death itself, but as the companion who gives
guidance to the newly deceased, and as a Lady With Wings who comforts
the deceased's living relatives. Nephthys is in most myths the
youngest daughter of Nut, sister of Isis and Osiris and the
sister-consort of Seth. In later periods Nephthys is also considered
to be the mother of Anubis, a primordial form of the lord of the dead
who later became subservient to Osiris in the Egyptian cultic myth.

Nephthys had connections with life as well as death -- she stood at
the head of the birth-bed to comfort and assist the mother giving
birth (while her sister, Isis, stood at the foot to midwife the
child). To our current Egyptological knowledge, Nephthys did not have
her own cult or temples in Egypt until the Ptolemaic-Roman period;
however, as her name is merely a title (the same title given to the
eldest woman in any ancient Egyptian household), it is possible that
Nephthys may be a specialized form of another goddess; probable
candidates include Bat (as she is called the "Lady of Het," or
"Nebt-het") and Neith (with whom Nephthys is paired in the canopic
shrine quadrants, as Isis is with Serket, who is sometimes seen to be
an aspect of Isis. Neith's being the "eldest of goddesses," along
with her connection with weaving and funerary garments lends credence
to this theory, as does the interchangeable depiction of Neith and/or
Nephthys in symmetrical transposition on a number of Late Period
temples.


In the Roman Catholic Church, today is celebrated as the Feast Day of
St. Augustine of Hippo. Saint Augustine was born in A.D. 354 in
Tagaste, a provincial Roman city in North Africa. He was raised and
educated in Carthage. His mother Monica (Saint Monica) was a devout
Christian and his father Patricius a Pagan. As a youth Augustine
followed the unpopular Manichaean religion, much to the horror of his
mother. In Carthage, he developed a relationship with a young woman
who would be his concubine for over a decade and produce a son. His
education and early career was in philosophy and rhetoric, the art of
persuasion and public speaking. He taught in Tagaste and Carthage, but
soon aspired to compete with the best, in Rome. However, Augustine
grew disappointed with the Roman schools, which he found apathetic.
Manichean friends introduced him to the prefect of the City of Rome,
Symmachus, who had been asked to provide a professor of rhetoric for
the imperial court at Milan.

The young provincial won the job and headed north to take up his
position in late 384. At age thirty, Augustine had won the most
visible academic chair in the Latin world, at a time when such posts
gave ready access to political careers. However, he felt the tensions
of life at an imperial court, lamenting one day as he rode in his
carriage to deliver a grand speech before the emperor, that a drunken
beggar he passed on the street had a less careworn existence than he.
Although Monica pressed the claims of Christianity, it is the bishop
of Milan, Ambrose, who had most influence over Augustine. Ambrose was
a master of rhetoric like Augustine himself, but older and more
experienced. Prompted by Ambrose's sermons, Augustine moved away from
Manichaeism, but instead of becoming Catholic like Ambrose, he
converted to pagan Neoplatonism. Augustine's mother followed him to
Milan and he allowed her to arrange a society marriage, for which he
abandoned his concubine (however he had to wait two years until his
fiancée came of age - and promptly took up in the meantime with
another woman.)

In the summer of 386, in a garden, Augustine underwent a profound
personal crisis and decided to convert to Christianity, abandon his
career in rhetoric, quit his teaching position in Milan, give up any
ideas of marriage (much to the horror of his mother), and devote
himself full time to religion, celibacy and the priesthood. Ambrose
baptized Augustine on Easter day in 387, and soon thereafter in 388 he
returned to Africa. On his way back to Africa his mother died, as did
his son soon after, leaving him relatively alone. Upon his return to
north Africa he created a monastic foundation at Tagaste for himself
and a group of friends. In 391 he was ordained a priest in Hippo
Regius, (now Annaba, in Algeria). He became a famous preacher (more
than 350 preserved sermons are believed to be authentic), and was
noted for combating the Manichaean heresy.

In 396 he was made coadjutor bishop of Hippo (assistant with the right
of succession on the death of the current bishop), and remained as
bishop in Hippo until his death in 430. He left his monastery, but
continued to lead a monastic life in the episcopal residence. He left
a Rule (Latin, Regula) for his monastery that has led him to be
designated the "patron saint of Regular Clergy," that is, parish
clergy who live by a monastic rule. Augustine died on August 28,
during the siege of Hippo by the Vandals. He is said to have
encouraged its citizens to resist the attacks, primarily on the
grounds that the Vandals adhered to Arianism, which Augustine regarded
as heretical.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOUCRES

Livy (http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/Livy/), Encyclopedia Mythica
("Nephthys." Encyclopedia Mythica from Encyclopedia Mythica Online.
<http://www.pantheon.org/articles/n/nephthys.html>), Wikipedia
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustine_of_Hippo),
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37376 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
Eheu! Luci Claudi Romule!

No - Rome is not empty. I think that, with a week off politics (is that
really possible?), after a rather lively few weeks of political controversy,
contumely and conversation, most people are probably sitting back and
breathing a sigh of peace and contentment. Others are most likely on
holiday. There are always emails on this list and all are interesting to
read - why not join in with the various subjects that people post? Anyway,
after your posting on here, I'd be willing to bet you get loads of replies!

Vale optime!

Sextus Pilatus Barbatus



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of luciusclaudiusromulus
Sent: 28 August 2005 07:30
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Is Rome Empty?



Salve Roma,
I am Lucius Cladius Romulus, I am in the Eastern Part of TN. I
have been a member for almost two years now, and still have not met
anyone, even in my area, and only two persons have responded to my e-
mails, of which I am gratefull.I love everything ancient Roman, yet
even after joining Nova Roma still do not have anyone to speak with. I
have signed up for several on-line classes from Nova Roma, and still no
replies. What is going on? Is Rome empty?
I am starting to feel all alone here.Did I join a group of stiffs,
people who will not converse with you unless they know you personally
already? I would love to participate in anything Nova Roma has to
offer, get more people to join, ect, but why? Only two people have
bothered to take the time to respond to my questions in two years!Is
this why Rome fell?

Vale,
Lucius Claudius Romulus








_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37377 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
SALVE LUCI CLAUDI ROMULE !

Yes, the Rome is not empty. But is summer and a lot of us are still on holiday. Or they discuss in different roman interest groups. I'll bet, too.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

Peter Bird <p.bird@...> wrote:
Eheu! Luci Claudi Romule!

No - Rome is not empty. I think that, with a week off politics (is that
really possible?), after a rather lively few weeks of political controversy,
contumely and conversation, most people are probably sitting back and
breathing a sigh of peace and contentment. Others are most likely on
holiday. There are always emails on this list and all are interesting to
read - why not join in with the various subjects that people post? Anyway,
after your posting on here, I'd be willing to bet you get loads of replies!

Vale optime!

Sextus Pilatus Barbatus



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of luciusclaudiusromulus
Sent: 28 August 2005 07:30
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Is Rome Empty?



Salve Roma,
I am Lucius Cladius Romulus, I am in the Eastern Part of TN. I
have been a member for almost two years now, and still have not met
anyone, even in my area, and only two persons have responded to my e-
mails, of which I am gratefull.I love everything ancient Roman, yet
even after joining Nova Roma still do not have anyone to speak with. I
have signed up for several on-line classes from Nova Roma, and still no
replies. What is going on? Is Rome empty?
I am starting to feel all alone here.Did I join a group of stiffs,
people who will not converse with you unless they know you personally
already? I would love to participate in anything Nova Roma has to
offer, get more people to join, ect, but why? Only two people have
bothered to take the time to respond to my questions in two years!Is
this why Rome fell?

Vale,
Lucius Claudius Romulus








_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------






"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37378 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Multae sententiae de constitutione et de lege constitutiva
Salve Piscinus,

< We did not leave due to the
> superabundance of
> regulation, but over how some magistrates did not
> abide by those
> regulae and instead abused the authority of their
> offices. Old
> issues I won't go into again.

There are also a bunch of citizens who left because of
you. You do bring a wealth of information back with
you and for that I am glad. You've brought new life to
the Religio list. It's too bad that the citizens of
Gens Cornelia don't come back as well.

The old NR of 1999-2001, no longer exists. Even with
the fighting that took place, at least this place had
spirit....

Diana Octavia

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37379 From: publiusminius Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciusclaudiusromulus"
<luciusclaudiusromulus@y...> wrote:
> Salve Roma,
> I am Lucius Cladius Romulus, I am in the Eastern Part of TN. I
> have been a member for almost two years now, and still have not met
> anyone, even in my area, and only two persons have responded to my e-
> mails, of which I am gratefull.I love everything ancient Roman, yet
> even after joining Nova Roma still do not have anyone to speak with. I
> have signed up for several on-line classes from Nova Roma, and still no
> replies. What is going on? Is Rome empty?
> I am starting to feel all alone here.Did I join a group of stiffs,
> people who will not converse with you unless they know you personally
> already? I would love to participate in anything Nova Roma has to
> offer, get more people to join, ect, but why? Only two people have
> bothered to take the time to respond to my questions in two years!Is
> this why Rome fell?
>
> Vale,
> Lucius Claudius Romulus


Salve Lucii,

well I've tried to set up some own initiatives to bring some more
'action' into NR and attract new members, and I'd be happy to have a
helping hand. The forum is up and running, but could use some new
active members. Recently, I've set up a blog. I'm still looking after
a couple of other people who could write some (medium sized) texts for
the blog, so if you're interested in helping me out with this, please
contact me on groentje123@...


unofficial NR Blog: http://novaromanews.blogspot.com/

unofficial NR Forum: http://www.takeforum.com/forum/?mforum=novaroma


Vale

Publius Minius Mercator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37380 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
Salve Lucius Claudius Romulus,

> I am starting to feel all alone here.Did I join
> a group of stiffs,
> people who will not converse with you unless they
> know you personally
> already? I would love to participate in anything
> Nova Roma has to
> offer, get more people to join, ect, but why? Only
> two people have
> bothered to take the time to respond to my questions
> in two years!Is
> this why Rome fell?

The problem is that most of the poeple that you've
emailed from your province are inactive and are no
longer interested in NR. I can't understand why there
email addresses ares till on the citizens list.

Feel free to ask me questions and I'll answer. I've
been around NR since its infancy.
Vale,
Diana

>
>
> Vale,
> >
>
>
>
>
>




____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37381 From: Tribune Albucius Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Back in tribunician office
P. Memmius Albucius omnibus s.d.

S.V.G.E.R.


I have the pleasure to inform you all that I am back in home and
fully in my daily tribunician office.

Many thanks to my colleagues tribunes, specially to Hon. Maior and
Fuscus, who have given some of you some informations on my attending
in Rome european conventus concerning the senate report debate.
These answers would have shown, if necessary, that the Tribunate, in
spite of the freedom of action that each of its members keeps, works
continuously and collectively. Cordial thanks, also, to Consul
Caesar and Praeses Scipio for their messages on the same item.

Naturally, I will answer every letter that I have received during my
holidays, and give a full reply to the interesting senate report
question, using every useful contribution made on the subject(Censor
Marinus, Senatrix Strabo and Silvana ones, specially)

At last, I will join the illustri citizens who had said their
happiness in having attended the Rome conventus. Even if I had not
the possibility to participate to all its events, I did really
appreciate meeting all of the people there. I think that this event
has been fully successful, just, among others, in the fact that we
all have the possibility to speak directly and friendly each others.
My special thoughts go to our dear Equitius Cato, who has flied
across the ocean to join us, and to the whole Dacia team, which has
engaged important expenses for the conventus. These kind of things
do give you a lot of energy to carry on our office and involvment in
Nova Roma.

Valete omnes,

P. Memmius Albucius
Tribunus Plebis
Legatus Ludgunensis Galliae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37382 From: marcushoratius Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: a.d. V Kal. Sept.
Salve Cai Cato

I have been enjoying your excerpts from Livy. You did today,
however, seem to have neglected some additional information that
might be of interest to gentiles Romani. Today, in ante diem
quintum Kalendas Septemberias, is the feast day of Sol and Luna, the
day marking the dedication of a shrine in the Circus for the twin
lights of Latona, according to the Fasti Praenestini and in the
Fasti Furii Philocali.

Nurturing Sol, shining charioteer,
who brings forth and conceals light,
born each day unaltered, may you
Never see a city greater than Rome.

Gentle Moon, Ilithyia, Lucina,
by whatever name you wish called,
Gentalis, watch over mothers,
may you give them gentle deliveries.

~ Quintus Horatius Flaccus, Carmen Saeculares Lines 9-16


Vale
M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
<mlcinnyc@y...> wrote:
> OSD G. Equitius Cato
>
> Salvete omnes!
>
> Today is ante diem V Kalendas Septembris; the day is Comitialis.
>
> "Cito enim arescit lacrima, praesertim in alienis malis." (Tears
dry
> quickly, especially when they are for others' misfortunes) -
Cicero,
> De partitione oratoria
>
> "They were denouncing these indignities in the ears of men,
> apprehensive for their own safety, who listened to them with
stronger
> indignation than the men who were speaking felt. They went on to
> assert that after all there would be no limit to the seizure of
land
> by the patricians or the murder of the plebs by the deadly usury
until
> the plebs elected one of the consuls from their own ranks as a
> guardian of their liberties. The tribunes of the plebs were now
> objects of contempt since their power was shattering itself by
their
> own veto. There could be no fair or just administration as long as
the
> executive power was in the hands of the other party, while they had
> only the right of protesting by their veto; nor would the plebs
ever
> have an equal share in the government till the executive authority
was
> thrown open to them; nor would it be enough, as some people might
> suppose, to allow plebeians to be voted for at the election of
> consuls. Unless it was made obligatory for one consul at least to
be
> chosen from the plebs, no plebeian would ever become consul. Had
they
> forgotten that after they had decided that consular tribunes
should be
> elected in preference to consuls in order that the highest office
> might be open to plebeians, not a single plebeian was elected
consular
> tribune for four-and-forty years? What did they suppose? Did they
> imagine that the men who had been accustomed to fill all the eight
> places when consular tribunes were elected would of their own free
> will consent to share two places with the plebs, or that they would
> allow the path to the consulship to be opened when they had so long
> blocked the one to the consular tribuneship? The people would have
to
> secure by law what they could not gain by favour, and one of the
two
> consulships would have to be placed beyond dispute as open to the
> plebs alone, for if it were open to a contest it would always be
the
> prey of the stronger party. The old, oft-repeated taunt could no
> longer be made now that there were no men amongst the plebs
suitable
> for curule magistracies. Was the government carried on with less
> spirit and energy after the consulship of P. Licinius Calvus, who
was
> the first plebeian to be elected to that post, than during the
years
> when only patricians held the office? Nay, on the contrary, there
had
> been some cases of patricians being impeached after their year of
> office, but none of plebeians. The quaestors also, like the
consular
> tribunes, had a few years previously begun to be elected from the
> plebs; in no single instance had the Roman people had any cause to
> regret those appointments. The one thing that was left for the
plebs
> to strive for was the consulship. That was the pillar, the
stronghold
> of their liberties. If they arrived at that, the Roman people would
> realise that monarchy had been completely banished from the City,
and
> that their freedom was securely established, for in that day
> everything in which the patricians were pre-eminent would come to
the
> plebs - power, dignity, military glory, the stamp of nobility;
great
> things for themselves to enjoy, but greater still as legacies to
their
> children. When they saw that speeches of this kind were listened to
> with approval, they brought forward a fresh proposal, viz. that
> instead of the duumviri (the two keepers of the Sacred Books) a
> College of Ten should be formed, half of them plebeians and half
> patricians. The meeting of the Assembly, which was to pass these
> measures, was adjourned till the return of the army which was
> besieging Velitrae." - Livy, History of Rome 6.37
>
>
> In ancient Egypt today was celebrated as the Nativity of Nepthys.
The
> "Mistress of the House" (Nebet-het or Nebt-het in the Egyptian
> Language), Nephthys is the "Friend of the Dead," and is first
> mentioned in Old Kingdom funerary literature as riding the "night
> boat" of the underworld, meeting the deceased king's spirit and
> accompanying him into "Lightland." Her hair is metaphorically
compared
> to the strips of cloth which shroud the bodies of the dead.
Nephthys
> is almost universally depicted as a woman with the hieroglyphic
> symbols of her name (a basket and a house, stacked on top of each
> other) situated atop her head, though she can also be depicted as a
> bird (most often a kite or some other form of falcon/hawk). She was
> associated with funerary rituals throughout ancient Egyptian
history
> and was venerated not as Death itself, but as the companion who
gives
> guidance to the newly deceased, and as a Lady With Wings who
comforts
> the deceased's living relatives. Nephthys is in most myths the
> youngest daughter of Nut, sister of Isis and Osiris and the
> sister-consort of Seth. In later periods Nephthys is also
considered
> to be the mother of Anubis, a primordial form of the lord of the
dead
> who later became subservient to Osiris in the Egyptian cultic myth.
>
> Nephthys had connections with life as well as death -- she stood at
> the head of the birth-bed to comfort and assist the mother giving
> birth (while her sister, Isis, stood at the foot to midwife the
> child). To our current Egyptological knowledge, Nephthys did not
have
> her own cult or temples in Egypt until the Ptolemaic-Roman period;
> however, as her name is merely a title (the same title given to the
> eldest woman in any ancient Egyptian household), it is possible
that
> Nephthys may be a specialized form of another goddess; probable
> candidates include Bat (as she is called the "Lady of Het," or
> "Nebt-het") and Neith (with whom Nephthys is paired in the canopic
> shrine quadrants, as Isis is with Serket, who is sometimes seen to
be
> an aspect of Isis. Neith's being the "eldest of goddesses," along
> with her connection with weaving and funerary garments lends
credence
> to this theory, as does the interchangeable depiction of Neith
and/or
> Nephthys in symmetrical transposition on a number of Late Period
> temples.
>
>
> In the Roman Catholic Church, today is celebrated as the Feast Day
of
> St. Augustine of Hippo. Saint Augustine was born in A.D. 354 in
> Tagaste, a provincial Roman city in North Africa. He was raised and
> educated in Carthage. His mother Monica (Saint Monica) was a devout
> Christian and his father Patricius a Pagan. As a youth Augustine
> followed the unpopular Manichaean religion, much to the horror of
his
> mother. In Carthage, he developed a relationship with a young woman
> who would be his concubine for over a decade and produce a son. His
> education and early career was in philosophy and rhetoric, the art
of
> persuasion and public speaking. He taught in Tagaste and Carthage,
but
> soon aspired to compete with the best, in Rome. However, Augustine
> grew disappointed with the Roman schools, which he found apathetic.
> Manichean friends introduced him to the prefect of the City of
Rome,
> Symmachus, who had been asked to provide a professor of rhetoric
for
> the imperial court at Milan.
>
> The young provincial won the job and headed north to take up his
> position in late 384. At age thirty, Augustine had won the most
> visible academic chair in the Latin world, at a time when such
posts
> gave ready access to political careers. However, he felt the
tensions
> of life at an imperial court, lamenting one day as he rode in his
> carriage to deliver a grand speech before the emperor, that a
drunken
> beggar he passed on the street had a less careworn existence than
he.
> Although Monica pressed the claims of Christianity, it is the
bishop
> of Milan, Ambrose, who had most influence over Augustine. Ambrose
was
> a master of rhetoric like Augustine himself, but older and more
> experienced. Prompted by Ambrose's sermons, Augustine moved away
from
> Manichaeism, but instead of becoming Catholic like Ambrose, he
> converted to pagan Neoplatonism. Augustine's mother followed him to
> Milan and he allowed her to arrange a society marriage, for which
he
> abandoned his concubine (however he had to wait two years until his
> fiancée came of age - and promptly took up in the meantime with
> another woman.)
>
> In the summer of 386, in a garden, Augustine underwent a profound
> personal crisis and decided to convert to Christianity, abandon his
> career in rhetoric, quit his teaching position in Milan, give up
any
> ideas of marriage (much to the horror of his mother), and devote
> himself full time to religion, celibacy and the priesthood. Ambrose
> baptized Augustine on Easter day in 387, and soon thereafter in
388 he
> returned to Africa. On his way back to Africa his mother died, as
did
> his son soon after, leaving him relatively alone. Upon his return
to
> north Africa he created a monastic foundation at Tagaste for
himself
> and a group of friends. In 391 he was ordained a priest in Hippo
> Regius, (now Annaba, in Algeria). He became a famous preacher (more
> than 350 preserved sermons are believed to be authentic), and was
> noted for combating the Manichaean heresy.
>
> In 396 he was made coadjutor bishop of Hippo (assistant with the
right
> of succession on the death of the current bishop), and remained as
> bishop in Hippo until his death in 430. He left his monastery, but
> continued to lead a monastic life in the episcopal residence. He
left
> a Rule (Latin, Regula) for his monastery that has led him to be
> designated the "patron saint of Regular Clergy," that is, parish
> clergy who live by a monastic rule. Augustine died on August 28,
> during the siege of Hippo by the Vandals. He is said to have
> encouraged its citizens to resist the attacks, primarily on the
> grounds that the Vandals adhered to Arianism, which Augustine
regarded
> as heretical.
>
> Valete bene!
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> SOUCRES
>
> Livy (http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/Livy/), Encyclopedia
Mythica
> ("Nephthys." Encyclopedia Mythica from Encyclopedia Mythica Online.
> <http://www.pantheon.org/articles/n/nephthys.html>), Wikipedia
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustine_of_Hippo),
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37383 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: a.d. V Kal. Sept.
G. Equitius Cato M. Horationi Piscino quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve Piscinus et salvete omnes.

And thank you. I'll add that to my list of things to investigate for
future posts :-)

Also, this is a good time to once again encourage all citizens to send
me anything they would like to see in the calendar post on a specific
date: prayers, rites, anything they might want to share with the
quirites on any given date.

Vale et valete!

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@s...> wrote:
> Salve Cai Cato
>
> I have been enjoying your excerpts from Livy. You did today,
> however, seem to have neglected some additional information that
> might be of interest to gentiles Romani. Today, in ante diem
> quintum Kalendas Septemberias, is the feast day of Sol and Luna [SNIP]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37384 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Back in tribunician office
AVE TRIBUNE !

Tribune Albucius <albucius_aoe@...> wrote:
P. Memmius Albucius omnibus s.d.
S.V.G.E.R.
<<I have the pleasure to inform you all that I am back in home and
fully in my daily tribunician office.>>

You are welcome !

<<At last, I will join the illustri citizens who had said their
happiness in having attended the Rome conventus. Even if I had not
the possibility to participate to all its events, I did really
appreciate meeting all of the people there.>>

Yes, indeed. It was nice to meet you.

<<My special thoughts go to our dear Equitius Cato, who has flied
across the ocean to join us, and to the whole Dacia team.>>

Thank you , tribune, for appreciations.

A photo for you.

OPTIME VALE,

IVL SABINVS






---------------------------------





Roma 129






"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37385 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Multae sententiae de constitutione et de lege constitutiva
---Aventina, what are you talking about this morning/afternoon, dear?


Which 'bunch' of citizens left, supposedly because of Moravius
Piscinus?? And how in hades would you know because you were not
active at all during the time Piscinus came to us in 2000 and
departed 'with' several persons in Spring 2001?

Vado (remember him?) informed the readership of the Britannia list
(the old Britannia List)in the spring (April or so) of 2000 that you
had 'resigned'... I remember as I had just joined NR a couple of
months prior to this...it was around the time a few from the U.S.
gathered to meet with some citizens of Britannia.

Whether in fact you had zipped yourself away from your actual
citizenship via the censors is not my business...but I somehow don't
*exactly* think this makes you the most credible source of
information regarding who left NR during your absence.

To boot,you were never a filias of gens Cornelia from 2000 to mid
2004, unless of course you had two citizenships, and I'll give you
the benefit of the doubt here....let's not go there. At any rate,
your 'information' is perhaps based on works of either Hans
Christian Andersen or the Brothers Grimm....not any actual facts
that I am aware of to the above date....

Nothing like a good 'hogwash' of confabulation to get one wide
awake. Works like cold water on the face....for that you have my
sincere thanks this morning, my time if for nothing else... as I
have things to do...in alert mode.

Pompeia





In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Diana Octavia Aventina
<dianaaventina@y...> wrote:
> Salve Piscinus,
>
> < We did not leave due to the
> > superabundance of
> > regulation, but over how some magistrates did not
> > abide by those
> > regulae and instead abused the authority of their
> > offices. Old
> > issues I won't go into again.
>
> There are also a bunch of citizens who left because of
> you. You do bring a wealth of information back with
> you and for that I am glad. You've brought new life to
> the Religio list. It's too bad that the citizens of
> Gens Cornelia don't come back as well.
>
> The old NR of 1999-2001, no longer exists. Even with
> the fighting that took place, at least this place had
> spirit....
>
> Diana Octavia
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37386 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: feast of Sol and Luna
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

As Horatio Piscinus pointed out, today is indeed a celebration of Sol
and Luna. According to the Encyclopedia Mythica, Luna is the
personified goddess of the moon. Later she is identified with Diana,
Hecate, and most directly with Selene. Her temple, on the Aventine
Hill, was erected in the 6th century B.C. but was destroyed by the
great fire under Nero's regime. Sol is the personified god of the
sun, completely identical to the Greek Helios. He was possibly
worshipped as Sol Indiges in his temple on the Quirinalis. A second
temple was located at the Circus Maximus, near the race-tracks, where
he was considered to be the protector of the four-in-hands which
joined the races. The emperor Heliogabalus imported the cult of Sol
Invictus ("the invincible sun") from Syria and Sol was made god of the
state. (Encyclopedia Mythica - http://www.pantheon.org, "Sol" and "Luna")

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37387 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Multae sententiae de constitutione et de lege constitutiva
Salve Romans

Yes this shows how much better life is in NR when we don't talk about laws, constitutions and politics and the like. Yes this type of exchange is much more uplifting and productive. : (

I say we ban talk about politics forever. : )


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia<mailto:pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 8:30 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Multae sententiae de constitutione et de lege constitutiva


---Aventina, what are you talking about this morning/afternoon, dear?


Which 'bunch' of citizens left, supposedly because of Moravius
Piscinus?? And how in hades would you know because you were not
active at all during the time Piscinus came to us in 2000 and
departed 'with' several persons in Spring 2001?

Vado (remember him?) informed the readership of the Britannia list
(the old Britannia List)in the spring (April or so) of 2000 that you
had 'resigned'... I remember as I had just joined NR a couple of
months prior to this...it was around the time a few from the U.S.
gathered to meet with some citizens of Britannia.

Whether in fact you had zipped yourself away from your actual
citizenship via the censors is not my business...but I somehow don't
*exactly* think this makes you the most credible source of
information regarding who left NR during your absence.

To boot,you were never a filias of gens Cornelia from 2000 to mid
2004, unless of course you had two citizenships, and I'll give you
the benefit of the doubt here....let's not go there. At any rate,
your 'information' is perhaps based on works of either Hans
Christian Andersen or the Brothers Grimm....not any actual facts
that I am aware of to the above date....

Nothing like a good 'hogwash' of confabulation to get one wide
awake. Works like cold water on the face....for that you have my
sincere thanks this morning, my time if for nothing else... as I
have things to do...in alert mode.

Pompeia





In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Diana Octavia Aventina
<dianaaventina@y...> wrote:
> Salve Piscinus,
>
> < We did not leave due to the
> > superabundance of
> > regulation, but over how some magistrates did not
> > abide by those
> > regulae and instead abused the authority of their
> > offices. Old
> > issues I won't go into again.
>
> There are also a bunch of citizens who left because of
> you. You do bring a wealth of information back with
> you and for that I am glad. You've brought new life to
> the Religio list. It's too bad that the citizens of
> Gens Cornelia don't come back as well.
>
> The old NR of 1999-2001, no longer exists. Even with
> the fighting that took place, at least this place had
> spirit....
>
> Diana Octavia
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com<http://mail.yahoo.com/>




SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+roman+empire&c=3&s=73&.sig=WUTlMtENoMRB6MOID9-IPQ> Fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+roman+empire&c=3&s=73&.sig=7ZPJH_XakfyQXSLqXlFYDQ> The roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+roman+empire&c=3&s=73&.sig=EupvctrPtcX3_ywoebvYDQ>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37388 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: From the Archives of the Sodalis Coq et Coq 5
Salve Romans

From the Archives of the Sodalis Coq et Coq

Recipe: Grilled Lobster (Apicius 399)


Serves two

Ingredients
1 lobster
1 Tbs. coriander
1/3 cup garum
Pepper to taste (no damm it lots!)
2/3 cup wine vinegar
1 Tbs. olive oil

Split the lobsters in half lengthways and remove the bitter, intestine and
stomach sac. Make a basting sauce of the remaining ingredients by
grinding them together with a pestle & mortar. Brush the lobster flesh
with the sauce and grill, flesh side down first to colour the shell. After a
couple of minutes turn the lobster over and grill flesh side up. Baste the
lobster regularly to prevent it drying out. Cooking time depends on the
lobsters weight but 15-20 minutes should be plenty.

This dish could also be prepared, indeed is probably best prepared, on a
barbecue. Care should be taken not to allow the flesh to stick. In this
case I would recommend starting it flesh side to the grill and then doing
the majority of the cooking shell side down whilst basting the top.

This dish is taken and slightly adapted from "A Taste of Ancient Rome"
by Ilaria Gozzini Giacosa.


Respectively submitted by the Sodalis Coq et Coq

In vino veritas

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37389 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
Salve, Luci Claudi Romule, et salvete, omnes!

> Salve Roma,
> I am Lucius Cladius Romulus, I am in the Eastern Part of TN.

As do some other citizens.

> I
> have been a member for almost two years now, and still have not met
> anyone, even in my area, and only two persons have responded to my e-
> mails, of which I am gratefull.I love everything ancient Roman, yet
> even after joining Nova Roma still do not have anyone to speak with. I
> have signed up for several on-line classes from Nova Roma, and still no
> replies.

There was a very active citizen in the Nashville area; I believe that
there are others in that vicinity--but they may be away, or not have net
access apart from school. Here in the NE US at least, it's still summer
vacation.

I'm not aware that Nova Roma conducts any form of online classes, but
the Academia Thules does. However, I suspect that none is in progress right
now, for the very good reason that people are on vacation. I shall be
teaching a Latin course there which you are welcome to join, and so will my
colleague Avitus. Were the courses for which you signed up conducted by the
Academia Thules? Did they actually start? (some don't...) Were you on the
appropriate mailing list(s)?


>What is going on? Is Rome empty?
> I am starting to feel all alone here.

I'm the only active citizen in my county. There may be one inactive
one, and one in a county some 70 miles away. Some people are the only
citizens in their entire countries. Have you joined any sodality lists
(granted, communication there is spotty)? I greet all newcomers to the
sodalitates whose lists I moderate so that the newbies feel welcome.


>Did I join a group of stiffs,
> people who will not converse with you unless they know you personally
> already?

No, not at all. We make friends here.

>I would love to participate in anything Nova Roma has to
> offer, get more people to join, ect,

Did you attend the filming at the Nashville Parthenon last October?
There was an event open to the public, as well as the filming limited to
prior registrants.

>but why? Only two people have
> bothered to take the time to respond to my questions in two years!

When I became a citizen, I contacted most members of my gens, which at
the time numbered about 18 and was under the leadership of one individual,
as all gentes were at the time. I never received a single reply. Only one
person, a magistrate, answered my questions, and another official answered
some other questions.

Have you considered joining the New Roman list? You're not new, but
neither are all of the members there. You might find some friends there, or
in one of the sodalitates. What are your interests? There's an SIG
(sodalitas) for just about everything.

>Is
> this why Rome fell?

I don't think so...
>
> Vale,
> Lucius Claudius Romulus
>
Vale, et valete,

A. Tullia Scholastica


>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37390 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Salvete!

This is a great topic for conversation. I have heard different views
about Augustus over the years both good and bad but overall I have
come to the conclusion that he was a shrewd politician who was able
to outwit the more military minded generals. The fall of the
republic was a forgone conclusion set in motion before his time.

When I think of Rome's golden age I think of Augustus; under his
administration Rome and her empire were really set on its feet with
Pax Romana. In comparison to other men and emperors of his time I
thought he did vey well. He seemed to be more Stoic in the way he
lived avoiding lavish lifestyles, trying to set some sorts of moral
codes. Even Cleopatra who knocked two tough generals off their feet
was unable to drag the younger Augustus to the sack; if she was the
great intellectual enchantress and beauty by the standards of those
times, she never phased the stronger character of Augustus which
showed that his privates did not rule his brain.

You can find fault with every human in the world; even Mother Teresa
and many writers have mentioned his short comings and weaknesses..
Overall however you did not get to such a position and let alone
hold it for such a long time by being weak in character and stupid
intellectually; in short, my hat goes off to Augustus. I think his
benevolence and service to Rome far exceeds his house cleaning
earlier on.

Now these are just my personal thoughts and do not mean this to be
an academic exercise so I haven't hit the books for quotes,
critiques etc.

Regards.

Quintus Lanius Paulinus





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, laurent_coffre@b... wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Salvete,
>
> In an effort to keep political and other boring stuff at bay, I
copy below
> something I sent to the Britannia list some time ago when we were
> discussing the role Octavianus played in the fall of the republic.
The
> question, of course, has not been settled so I thought I could
poke around
> and see if some of you would like to comment and offer suggestions
or more
> evidence on what I have written ;-)
> I would be happy to provide my sources if anybody is interested...
>
> So here it goes below,
>
> Valete
>
> Laureatus
>
> xxxxxx
>
> Thank you both for taking interest in the discussion. I would
like, if I
> may, express a couple of things that prompted me to write on this
list
> about Octavius/Octavianus/Caesar/Augustus.
>
> Quite apart from any other consideration, his very name, as seen
above, has
> evolved over the years reflecting perhaps that the young man and
the older
> stateman were quite different. It may also indicate that Augustus
knew how
> to adapt to the different situations he faced and made the right
choice at
> the right time, ie phasing out Octavianus for Caesar. Both
cognomina were
> already in his full name but he chose the latter to be addressed
when he
> started his political career. In other words, he knew what he was
doing and
> what trick to use to gather popular support.
> But he could also have done so to honour the memory of his
assassinated
> “father” so the revenge argument is also valid.
>
> The young Octavianus was only 18 when Caesar died. I don’t know
about you
> but when I was 18, I was nowhere near capable enough of mounting a
> succesful coup! One could argue that Romans matured faster (?) or
rather
> that their abilities as adults were recognised earlier so that
Octavius was
> seen as an equal by his peers. But I doubt that. I have read that
he was
> not immune against mockery and there seems to be indications that
some
> Senators did not take him seriously. Indeed, it is good to
remember that
> the most junior magistracy, the quaestorship, was not available
for men
> under the age of 30. So it is very possible to imagine that when
Octavius
> arrived in Rome he had a hard time to convince people that he
would be a
> serious contendant.
>
> Furthermore, Octavius came from a relatively unknown family with no
> consular to speak of. He had done nothing in particular to be
noticed by
> his contemporaries, he had held no office, fought no battles. He
was too
> young and a nobody. Of course age is not always relevant: One can
turn to
> other examples of young men achieving great things, Alexander or
Bonaparte
> for instance. Those two generals, however, were exceptional
soldiers and
> earned their legitimacy for their later rule through their
abilities and
> successes in war. Octavius did not have this opportunity.
> If I had been a bookmaker in the summer of 44BC, I don’t think I
would have
> bet my old shirt on him to rule the Urbs.
>
> So, how did he do it? Did he have plans laid out and set out to
usurp
> power? Did he really want revenge against the murderers of his
“father”
> when no one else of substance and other relatives and friends
stood up to
> do just that? Did he get caught in the events and was lucky,
sometimes
> ruthless, in his decision making so that he would survive?
>
> I do not have an answer but I would investigate the matter along
two lines
> that could shed some light on my questions:
>
> 1. He was Caesar’s heir. That, in my opinion, is the single most
important
> fact to explain his head start. Just by having been adopted,
Octavius had
> at his disposal a colossal fortune, the largest numbers of clients
who
> passed traditionally from the deceased patron to his heir and the
support
> of Caesar’s veterans. This would certainly be enough for anybody
to
> emphasize the “Caesar” part of one’s name to take full
advantage of the
> situation. Antonius, it must be said, was not fooled and,
unsuccesfully,
> tried to keep the fortune and manage it “on behalf” of the
heir…
>
> 2. Octavianus, the triumvir, and Augustus, the princeps, built
some kind of
> unwritten “constitution” (the word is ill chosen, please
forgive me) that
> looked more like a patchwork than a planned project. He took the
old
> Republican institutions, kept their democratic appearance but
tweaked them
> so that, effectively, he retained and centralised power long
enough in the
> hand of one man, his own, to acquire enough dignitas and wealth.
Then as
> the ultimate patron he yielded enough influence over his clients,
or
> subjects, who comprised by then the whole citizen body.
>
> My instinct, at this point is to think the following. A very
intelligent
> and shrewd young man inherits the greatest wealth and influence of
the then
> known world. These were troubled times, and although he might not
have
> wanted it, he had to use the resources at his disposal first to
survive,
> then to consolidate his power so that he would not be threatened.
Colossal
> resources called for colossal changes. It is worth noting that the
ageing
> Augustus took great pains to ensure a return to morals and was more
> inclined to clementia when his ennemies were no more. He did not
need to be
> ruthless anymore, he did not fear for his life anymore.
> The only thing we can be disappointed with, as modern students and
with
> hindsight, is that he did not restore the Republic when peace and
posperity
> had returned. Perhaps we could discuss that in another thread but
I doubt
> the question really bothered the 90% of the non elite population
who were
> probably better off and rather prefered to give away some of the
liberty
> they never had for a peace they could feel!
>
> So, in conclusion, who is to blame for the principate, if there is
blame to
> be assigned? Octavius who navigated the troubled water or the
conditions
> that created the heavy seas? And to go back to the original
question,
> linked to the previous one: Was Octavius a conscious tyrant or
simply a man
> of his time playing the cards life had dealt him?
>
>
_____________________________________________________________________
> Confidentiality Notice: The information in this document and
attachments is confidential and may also be legally privileged. It
is intended only for the use of the named recipient.
> Internet communications are not secure and therefore British
American Tobacco does not accept legal responsibility for the
contents of this message.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us
immediately and then delete this document. Do not disclose the
contents of this document to any other person, nor take any copies.
> Violation of this notice may be unlawful.
>
_____________________________________________________________________
_
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37391 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
G. Equitius Cato L. Claudio Romulo S.P.D.

Salve Romulus!

Rome is not empty; we've all just gone to Sorrentum for the August
holidays :-)

One small thing that may have kept the Forum a little quieter than
usual (as far as I'm concerned at least) is a vow I made not to talk
about law or politics for one week. The week is almost up (it ends
Wednesday, 31 August)...

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37392 From: JOEY NICOLE KING Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Silvae Novam Eboracum
Salve,

This is exactly what I had read :-) Thank you. And I misnamed the forest; it is deciduous, not indigenous. (I'm also looking for info on newt and salamander habitats for my son. My mistake.)

I found several maps that show present day areas where the forest is and I'm hoping to find find where it has covered in the past. At the moment it is very sparse in the Mediterranean region, though it covers a good deal of Europe, a large area in Asia and the eastern U.S. (including southeastern Canada. I'm going to keep looking and hopefully I'll find its range throughout the classical world. If I find any good maps or interesting tid-bits of info I'll post them.

Thanks again!

Vale,
Metelliana

"Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:
Salve Metelliana,

How are you? I can answer part of your question as I posted this
site about 10 days ago:

http://www.motherearthnews.com/library/1980_May_June/Ecoscience__The_
Greek_and_The_Romans_Did_It_Too

Apparently the Ancient Greeks and Romans did quite a job of
deforestation in the Mediterranean area which has been refered to as
goatscape over the years, The deforestation of Northern Europe
apparently began in the 1300's as towns and cities were founded and
grown. Apparently it was awful in the 16th - 18 th century when many
wooden ships were needed for the age of exploration and trade.


Meanwhile the encyclopedia summarizes:


History
Deforestation has been practiced by humans for thousands of years.
Fire was probably the first tool that allowed humans to modify the
landscape. The first evidence of deforestation shows up in the
Mesolithic. Fire was probably used to drive game into more
accessible areas. With the advent of agriculture fire became the
prime tool to clear land for crops. In Europe there is little solid
evidence before 5000 BP. Mesolithic foragers used fire to create
openings for red deer and wild boar. In Britain shade tolerant
species like oak and ash are replaced in the pollen record by
hazels, brambles, grasses and nettles. Removal of the forests led to
decreased transpiration resulting in the formation of upland peat
bogs. Widespread decreased in elm pollen across Europe between 6400-
6300 BP and 5200-5000 BP, starting in southern Europe and gradually
moving north to Britain, may represent land clearing by fire at the
onset of Neolithic agriculture. A large bonfire Fire is a form of
combustion. ... The Mesolithic (Greek mesos=middle and lithos=stone
or the Middle Stone Age) is the period between the Paleolithic and
Neolithic periods. ... World map showing location of Europe Europe
is geologically and geographically a peninsula, forming the
westernmost part of Eurasia. ... (8th millennium BC – 7th millennium
BC – 6th millennium BC – other millennia) Events circa 7000 BC –
Agriculture and settlement at Mehrgarh in South Asia circa 6500 BC –
English Channel formed circa 6100 BC – The Storegga Slide, causing a
megatsunami in the Norwegian Sea circa 6000 BC – Neolithic Age in
Korea circa... Before Present is a year numbering system, used for
the far past times, relating dates to the year 1950. ... In
anthropology, the hunter-gatherer way of life is that led by certain
societies of the Neolithic Era based on the exploitation of wild
plants and animals. ... Binomial name Cervus elaphus Linnaeus,, 1758
Subspecies Numerous - see text. ... Binomial name Sus scrofa
Linnaeus, 1758 The Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) is the wild ancestor of
the domesticated pig. ... Species See List of Quercus species The
term oak can be used as part of the common name of any of several
hundred species of trees and shrubs in the genus Quercus, and some
related genera, notably Lithocarpus. ... Species Many, see text. ...
Pollen under microscope Palynology is the science that studies
contemporary and fossil palynomorphs, including pollen, spores,
dinoflagellate cysts, acritarchs, chitinozoans and scolecodonts,
together with particulate organic matter (POM) and kerogen found in
sedimentary rocks and sediments. ... This article is about the tree;
for other meanings of hazel, see Hazel (disambiguation). ...
Transpiration is a continuous process caused by the evaporation of
water from leaves of plants and its corresponding uptake from roots
in the soil. ... Virgin boreal acid bogs at Browns Lake Bog, Ohio A
bog is a wetland type that accumulates peat, a deposit of dead plant
material. ... Species See text Elms are deciduous trees of the genus
Ulmus, family Ulmaceae. ... The Neolithic, (Greek neos=new,
lithos=stone, or New Stone Age) was a period in the development of
human technology that is traditionally the last part of the Stone
Age. ...

The historic silting of ports along the southern coasts of Asia
Minor (e.g. Clarus) and in coastal Syria during the last centuries
BC, and the famous silting up of the harbor for Bruges, which moved
port commerce to Antwerp, follow periods of increased settlement
growth (and apparently of deforestation) in the river basins of
their hinterlands. Anatolia (Greek: ανατολη anatole, rising of the
sun or East; compare Orient and Levant, by popular etymology Turkish
Anadolu to ana mother and dolu filled), also called by the Latin
name of Asia Minor, is a region of Southwest Asia which corresponds
today to the Asian portion of Turkey. ... The Dogcow The Dogcow is a
bitmapped image first introduced by Apple Computer. ... Sometimes
referred to as the Venice of the North, Bruges has many waterways
that run through the city. ... The hinterland is the rural territory
associated with an urban area, often a port. ...

In Changes in the Land (1983), William Cronon collected 17th century
New England Englishmen's reports of increased seasonal flooding
during the time that the forests were initially cleared, though no
connection was made at the time. One of the best documented and
successful attempts at refosteration was effected by the Prussian
government in the mid-19th century to save the Curonian Spit from
being engulfed by dunes. While the states marked in red show the
core of New England, the regions cultural influence may cover a
greater or lesser area than shown. ... The coat of arms of the
Kingdom of Prussia, 1701-1918 The word Prussia (German: Preußen or
Preussen, Polish: Prusy, Lithuanian: Prūsai, Latin: Borussia) has
had various (often contradictory) meanings: The land of the Baltic
Prussians (in what is now parts of southern Lithuania, the
Kaliningrad exclave of... Curonian Spit map The Curonian Spit
(Lit. ...


Recent change
The rate of clearance increased during the second half of the 19th
century due to agricultural expansion in Europe. Deforestation rates
peaked in New England about 1900 and in the Great Lakes region of
the United States in the late 19th century. Rates of tropical
deforestation have increased substantially into the post-war period
as logging operations became mechanised. Alternative meaning:
Nineteenth Century (periodical) (18th century — 19th century — 20th
century — more centuries) As a means of recording the passage of
time, the 19th century was that century which lasted from 1801-1900
in the sense of the Gregorian calendar. ... World map showing
location of Europe Europe is geologically and geographically a
peninsula, forming the westernmost part of Eurasia. ... The Great
Lakes from space The Great Lakes are a group of five large lakes on
or near the United States-Canadian border. ... This article should
be transwikied to wiktionary The term post-war is generally used for
the period after the end of World War II, i. ...

Growing worldwide demand for wood to be used for fire wood or in
construction, paper and furniture - as well as clearing land for
commercial and industrial development (including road construction)
have combined with growing local populations and their demands for
agricultural expansion and wood fuel to endanger ever larger forest
areas. A tree trunk as found at the Veluwe, The Netherlands Wood is
an organic material found as the primary content of the stems of
woody plants, especially trees, but also shrubs. ... This page is
related to transport; you may be looking for the 2002 Bollywood
movie Road. ...

Agricultural development schemes in Mexico, Brazil and Indonesia
moved large populations into the rainforest zone, further increasing
deforestation rates. One fifth of the world's tropical rainforest
was destroyed between 1960 and 1990. Estimates of deforestation of
tropical forest for the 1990s range from ca. 55,630 km² to ca.
120,000 km² each year. At this rate, all tropical forests may be
gone by the year 2090. Rainforest on Fatu-Hiva, Marquesas Islands A
rainforest is a forested biome with high annual rainfall due to the
Intertropical convergence zone. ... Square kilometre (US spelling:
Square kilometer), symbol km², is an SI unit of surface area. ...


Regards,

QLP





SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37393 From: JOEY NICOLE KING Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Salvete,

I have a question. How much contact did Octavius have with his uncle before Caesars death?

Valete,
Metelliana

"Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:
Salvete!

This is a great topic for conversation. I have heard different views
about Augustus over the years both good and bad but overall I have
come to the conclusion that he was a shrewd politician who was able
to outwit the more military minded generals. The fall of the
republic was a forgone conclusion set in motion before his time.

When I think of Rome's golden age I think of Augustus; under his
administration Rome and her empire were really set on its feet with
Pax Romana. In comparison to other men and emperors of his time I
thought he did vey well. He seemed to be more Stoic in the way he
lived avoiding lavish lifestyles, trying to set some sorts of moral
codes. Even Cleopatra who knocked two tough generals off their feet
was unable to drag the younger Augustus to the sack; if she was the
great intellectual enchantress and beauty by the standards of those
times, she never phased the stronger character of Augustus which
showed that his privates did not rule his brain.

You can find fault with every human in the world; even Mother Teresa
and many writers have mentioned his short comings and weaknesses..
Overall however you did not get to such a position and let alone
hold it for such a long time by being weak in character and stupid
intellectually; in short, my hat goes off to Augustus. I think his
benevolence and service to Rome far exceeds his house cleaning
earlier on.

Now these are just my personal thoughts and do not mean this to be
an academic exercise so I haven't hit the books for quotes,
critiques etc.

Regards.

Quintus Lanius Paulinus





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, laurent_coffre@b... wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Salvete,
>
> In an effort to keep political and other boring stuff at bay, I
copy below
> something I sent to the Britannia list some time ago when we were
> discussing the role Octavianus played in the fall of the republic.
The
> question, of course, has not been settled so I thought I could
poke around
> and see if some of you would like to comment and offer suggestions
or more
> evidence on what I have written ;-)
> I would be happy to provide my sources if anybody is interested...
>
> So here it goes below,
>
> Valete
>
> Laureatus
>
> xxxxxx
>
> Thank you both for taking interest in the discussion. I would
like, if I
> may, express a couple of things that prompted me to write on this
list
> about Octavius/Octavianus/Caesar/Augustus.
>
> Quite apart from any other consideration, his very name, as seen
above, has
> evolved over the years reflecting perhaps that the young man and
the older
> stateman were quite different. It may also indicate that Augustus
knew how
> to adapt to the different situations he faced and made the right
choice at
> the right time, ie phasing out Octavianus for Caesar. Both
cognomina were
> already in his full name but he chose the latter to be addressed
when he
> started his political career. In other words, he knew what he was
doing and
> what trick to use to gather popular support.
> But he could also have done so to honour the memory of his
assassinated
> “father” so the revenge argument is also valid.
>
> The young Octavianus was only 18 when Caesar died. I don’t know
about you
> but when I was 18, I was nowhere near capable enough of mounting a
> succesful coup! One could argue that Romans matured faster (?) or
rather
> that their abilities as adults were recognised earlier so that
Octavius was
> seen as an equal by his peers. But I doubt that. I have read that
he was
> not immune against mockery and there seems to be indications that
some
> Senators did not take him seriously. Indeed, it is good to
remember that
> the most junior magistracy, the quaestorship, was not available
for men
> under the age of 30. So it is very possible to imagine that when
Octavius
> arrived in Rome he had a hard time to convince people that he
would be a
> serious contendant.
>
> Furthermore, Octavius came from a relatively unknown family with no
> consular to speak of. He had done nothing in particular to be
noticed by
> his contemporaries, he had held no office, fought no battles. He
was too
> young and a nobody. Of course age is not always relevant: One can
turn to
> other examples of young men achieving great things, Alexander or
Bonaparte
> for instance. Those two generals, however, were exceptional
soldiers and
> earned their legitimacy for their later rule through their
abilities and
> successes in war. Octavius did not have this opportunity.
> If I had been a bookmaker in the summer of 44BC, I don’t think I
would have
> bet my old shirt on him to rule the Urbs.
>
> So, how did he do it? Did he have plans laid out and set out to
usurp
> power? Did he really want revenge against the murderers of his
“father”
> when no one else of substance and other relatives and friends
stood up to
> do just that? Did he get caught in the events and was lucky,
sometimes
> ruthless, in his decision making so that he would survive?
>
> I do not have an answer but I would investigate the matter along
two lines
> that could shed some light on my questions:
>
> 1. He was Caesar’s heir. That, in my opinion, is the single most
important
> fact to explain his head start. Just by having been adopted,
Octavius had
> at his disposal a colossal fortune, the largest numbers of clients
who
> passed traditionally from the deceased patron to his heir and the
support
> of Caesar’s veterans. This would certainly be enough for anybody
to
> emphasize the “Caesar” part of one’s name to take full
advantage of the
> situation. Antonius, it must be said, was not fooled and,
unsuccesfully,
> tried to keep the fortune and manage it “on behalf” of the
heir…
>
> 2. Octavianus, the triumvir, and Augustus, the princeps, built
some kind of
> unwritten “constitution” (the word is ill chosen, please
forgive me) that
> looked more like a patchwork than a planned project. He took the
old
> Republican institutions, kept their democratic appearance but
tweaked them
> so that, effectively, he retained and centralised power long
enough in the
> hand of one man, his own, to acquire enough dignitas and wealth.
Then as
> the ultimate patron he yielded enough influence over his clients,
or
> subjects, who comprised by then the whole citizen body.
>
> My instinct, at this point is to think the following. A very
intelligent
> and shrewd young man inherits the greatest wealth and influence of
the then
> known world. These were troubled times, and although he might not
have
> wanted it, he had to use the resources at his disposal first to
survive,
> then to consolidate his power so that he would not be threatened.
Colossal
> resources called for colossal changes. It is worth noting that the
ageing
> Augustus took great pains to ensure a return to morals and was more
> inclined to clementia when his ennemies were no more. He did not
need to be
> ruthless anymore, he did not fear for his life anymore.
> The only thing we can be disappointed with, as modern students and
with
> hindsight, is that he did not restore the Republic when peace and
posperity
> had returned. Perhaps we could discuss that in another thread but
I doubt
> the question really bothered the 90% of the non elite population
who were
> probably better off and rather prefered to give away some of the
liberty
> they never had for a peace they could feel!
>
> So, in conclusion, who is to blame for the principate, if there is
blame to
> be assigned? Octavius who navigated the troubled water or the
conditions
> that created the heavy seas? And to go back to the original
question,
> linked to the previous one: Was Octavius a conscious tyrant or
simply a man
> of his time playing the cards life had dealt him?
>
>
_____________________________________________________________________
> Confidentiality Notice: The information in this document and
attachments is confidential and may also be legally privileged. It
is intended only for the use of the named recipient.
> Internet communications are not secure and therefore British
American Tobacco does not accept legal responsibility for the
contents of this message.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us
immediately and then delete this document. Do not disclose the
contents of this document to any other person, nor take any copies.
> Violation of this notice may be unlawful.
>
_____________________________________________________________________
_





SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





---------------------------------
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37394 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Salve Metelliana,

JOEY NICOLE KING wrote:

> I have a question. How much contact did Octavius have with his uncle before Caesars death?

A fair amount. Octavianus went on campaign with his uncle for a year in
Spain, and at least according to Octavianus they had a lot of time
together in which the uncle taught the nephew. It was during this time
that Caesar the Dictator decided to name Octavianus as his heir and to
adopt him.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37395 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
As far as Cleopara VII is concerned as we have had
this discussion in the past,an intellectual she was-
albeit lingua latina, a raving beauty she was not.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <metelliana@...>
wrote:
> Salvete,
>
> I have a question. How much contact did Octavius
have with his uncle befor
> e Caesars death?
>
> Valete,
> Metelliana
>
> "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)"
<mjk@...> wrote:
> Salvete!
>
> This is a great topic for conversation. I have heard
different views
> about Augustus over the years both good and bad but
overall I have
> come to the conclusion that he was a shrewd
politician who was able
> to outwit the more military minded generals. The
fall of the
> republic was a forgone conclusion set in motion
before his time.
>
> When I think of Rome's golden age I think of
Augustus; under his
> administration Rome and her empire were really set
on its feet with
> Pax Romana. In comparison to other men and emperors
of his time I
> thought he did vey well. He seemed to be more Stoic
in the way he
> lived avoiding lavish lifestyles, trying to set some
sorts of moral
> codes. Even Cleopatra who knocked two tough generals
off their feet
> was unable to drag the younger Augustus to the sack;
if she was the
> great intellectual enchantress and beauty by the
standards of those
> times, she never phased the stronger character of
Augustus which
> showed that his privates did not rule his brain.
>
> You can find fault with every human in the world;
even Mother Teresa
> and many writers have mentioned his short comings
and weaknesses..
> Overall however you did not get to such a position
and let alone
> hold it for such a long time by being weak in
character and stupid
> intellectually; in short, my hat goes off to
Augustus. I think his
> benevolence and service to Rome far exceeds his
house cleaning
> earlier on.
>
> Now these are just my personal thoughts and do not
mean this to be
> an academic exercise so I haven't hit the books for
quotes,
> critiques etc.
>
> Regards.
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com,
laurent_coffre@b... wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Salvete,
> >
> > In an effort to keep political and other boring
stuff at bay, I
> copy below
> > something I sent to the Britannia list some time
ago when we were
> > discussing the role Octavianus played in the fall
of the republic.
> The
> > question, of course, has not been settled so I
thought I could
> poke around
> > and see if some of you would like to comment and
offer suggestions
> or more
> > evidence on what I have written ;-)
> > I would be happy to provide my sources if anybody
is interested...
> >
> > So here it goes below,
> >
> > Valete
> >
> > Laureatus
> >
> > xxxxxx
> >
> > Thank you both for taking interest in the
discussion. I would
> like, if I
> > may, express a couple of things that prompted me
to write on this
> list
> > about Octavius/Octavianus/Caesar/Augustus.
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37396 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> As far as Cleopara VII is concerned as we have had
> this discussion in the past,an intellectual she was-
> albeit lingua latina, a raving beauty she was not.
>

Salvete omnes,

Well from her busts and coins I would agree but she was not a beauty
by the standards of "our time" but maybe was considered attractive
then. Look back to the "beauties" from the 19th century , to the
court of Henry VIII, medieval portraits, the Medicis etc and they
are not attractive in comparisson to fashion models and starlets
today;
even during the 17th and 18th century plumpness or obesity was
considered beautiful, not to mention dark skin moles. I cannot help
but wonder what people of the past would view our standards of
beauty today!

Regards,

QLP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37397 From: Lucius Lusus Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Quot ciues in Nova Roma sunt?
Saluete, romani

Ego sum ualde curiosus sciendi quot ciues in Nova Roma nunc sunt? Septembrem mensem exspecto ut ciuis romanus fiam.

I am from Portugal: is there any other portuguese in Nova Roma?

Valete optume

Lucius Iulius Lusus



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37398 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Paulinus brought up a question in my mind, and here are the results:

http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Greek.htm

http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Egyptian.htm

http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Coins.htm



Compare the ancient portraits to these, modern ones:

http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Modern.htm



She kinda looks like Cher in some of the modern ones :-)

Valete bene,

Cato

(all images copywrite by http://sangha.net/messengers/)



>
> Well from her busts and coins I would agree but she was not a
beauty
> by the standards of "our time" but maybe was considered attractive
> then.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37399 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Thats from the modern and I dare say politically
correct stance that she is from Africa so she MUST BE
dark. Very few folks even heard or know of the
Ptolomies
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> Paulinus brought up a question in my mind, and here
are the results:
>
> http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Greek.htm
>
> http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Egyptian.htm
>
> http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Coins.htm
>
>
>
> Compare the ancient portraits to these, modern ones:
>
> http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Modern.htm
>
>
>
> She kinda looks like Cher in some of the modern ones
:-)
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
> (all images copywrite by
http://sangha.net/messengers/)
>
>
>
> >
> > Well from her busts and coins I would agree but
she was not a
> beauty
> > by the standards of "our time" but maybe was
considered attractive
> > then.
>
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37400 From: Legion XXIV Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Legion XXIV Vicesima Quarta Newsletter August 2005
VICESIMA QUARTA
The Newsletter of
LEGION XXIV - MEDIA ATLANTIA

AUGUST 2005

Gallio Velius Marsallas / George Metz
Praefectus - Commander
13 Post Run - Newtown Square PA 19073-3014
610-353-4982
legionxxiv@... www.legionxxiv.org

Commilitones

ADVENAE - Newcomers
*** Salvatore Nardozzi,Jr, Septimus Severius Salvatoriensis Caecus, with a Roman name like that you would think he is a lawyer, and guess what? - He is!, in the Scranton PA area. Got a legal problem? - contact him at harley61@... Septimus Servius is also a Roman cook, now that is a real asset to the Legion! He is actively pursuing getting his kit together and we look forward to having him, and his cooking, with us soon.
*** Mark Clauser, Marcus Claudius Tacitus mclauser@... comes to us from Easton, PA. He is a Latin instructor and a fluent Latin speaker, and is a 3-year veteran of the Conventiculum Latinum in Lexington KY - there will be no more sloppy Latin in our camp, when he is around! He is also a Roman cook, the second one to apply to the Legion this month! Although he has little reenactment experience, Marcus Claudius is a lover of all things Roman and with his Latin and cooking skills, he should be an asset to our ranks.
*** With these two prospective Roman cooks, we may see an improvement in our campaign food after all, at those events where we don't have Merlinia and the Campbells cooking for us.
*** Erik Herb, Caius Gallus Hiberus grunt762@... is from Mar Lin, (north-central) PA. He is a sergeant in the PA National Guard and hopes to enhance his interest in ancient history with us.
*** John Beneduce magnus1357@... hails from Kings (Brooklyn) NY. He has experience in the martial arts, wrestling and boxing, and may find his calling with the Ludus Magnus, under John Ebel, but we are not going turn away a potential fierce defender of Rome. Celts, Barbarians and Enemies of Rome Beware!
*** Daniel Ingersoll ares424@... of Woodbine, NJ is signing on as a student-squire. He has researched all reenacting periods, but wants to learn about the Roman military and its culture as he studies Latin in school. We look forward to him being with us in future campaigns.
*** Joseph Perkins, Tiberius Aetius seth@... will be serving as a vexillation unit in Pikin, LA. He is interested in the gladiatorial and fighting techniques of Rome. We hope have with us when comes north sometime.

Please join me in welcoming these new members to our ranks.

LEGION XXIV ON THE HISTORY CHANNEL ON LABOR DAY !!
VCR Alert!! Several members from Legions III Cyrenaica, XXIV MA and XXX Ulpia Victrix, took part in the filming of the upcoming two-hour History Channel Special "Rome: Engineering an Empire" to be broadcast on Monday, September 5 (Labor Day) 9:00 PM. The sequences about "Caesar bridging the Rhine River", in which we took part, comprises the first act of this two-hour program, so all of the hard work from our weekend of shooting on the Hudson is featured in the first ten minutes.
It will be interesting to see how much of two whole days (22 hours) of filming sessions actually made it into the final production.
The History Channel has started advertisements, billboards and posters promoting the show which you may have already seen. The network has also created a website: http://www.historychannel.com/rome/
We did insist on using only hamata ring maile armor (no segmentata), but a few imperial helmets and Pompeii swords may be visible. The producers, KPI out of New York City, gave us little time to prepare and there was not enough Republican gear to go around. Your Commander appears as the Centurion-Engineer in the episode, with Robert Norton, Mike Heenen, Lee Holeva, Quinton Johanson and others taking part, along with a group of SCA barbarians with whom we do battle. It was quite an interesting and exhausting experience and we hope you will tune us in on the History Channel on Labor Day with your VCR's and TVO's recording it! As an added note, they seem to be tying the "Engineering" program to the HBO weekly series "ROME", which begins on August 28. You will need to be subscribed to HBO to see this "ROME" 12 episode series. The episodes will be shown several times at varying hours each week. Many of us do not have HBO so we will be unable to see it. Anyone who has HBO might want to capture it to DVD or tape and make copies available. That is, if it is reasonably accurate and worth the trouble to save it. Maybe then we can get together some date to view it - and critique it - both what they got right and what they got wrong.

POMPEII EXHIBIT OTTAWA EVENT AFTER-ACTION - AUGUST 6 & 7
The Canadian Museum (Musee) of Civilization, in Ottawa, Ontario Canada, played host to a large exhibit on Pompeii as it was at the time of the eruption of the "Vesuvius" Volcano in 79AD. The Museum, actually in Gatineau, Quebec across the Ottawa River from Ottawa, is one of the biggest in Eastern Canada. The building, while modern in design, is quite impressive and the Totem Pole display in the Great Hall was awesome. The Pompeii Exhibit was also well worth seeing, along with the many other displays alluding the Canada's history. The Musee asked to have Roman reenactors, both military and civilian, for the weekend of August 6 & 7. This was the weekend after the Fort Malden event in Amherstburg Ontario. However, a number of legionaries and civilians did turn-out in Ottawa. Not as many as was hoped, but we were able to present a decent impression for the several thousand museum patrons who came into the courtyard to view the encampments, pila tossing and catapulta shooting.
Arrangements were made to accommodate most if not all with a room to sleep in. A financial compensation was also provided for the adult participants. The Museum supplied bails of hay for the pilum shooting range and encampments.
Marc Sarault - Marcus Darius Firmitus - of Legion XII Fulminata did a superb job in organizing the reenactors for the event.

Robert Norton - Servius Rustius Noricus - of Legion XXX Ulpia Victrix conducted a workshop inside the museum making caligae, belts and other Roman military gear. He also served to direct the patrons to the outdoor encampments. Robert got to practice his French in a real time environment, and learned that he was much better at French than he thought, and not as good as he would like to be. Robert's demo itself went very well, but he found that he was spending more time answering questions than working. He may have broken a record for answering the same question in French and English. The record for the most concurrent questions to Robert/Servius was from a 12 year old boy who wanted to know everything and anything about the Romans. His funniest question was from a French lady, about his age (over 39), who wanted to know what he was wearing under his tunica.
The people who stopped to watch or ask questions were great, but all of them were surprised when he allowed them to touch the equipment. Also many of them were taken aback when they found out that we did not take money to have our their picture taken with us. He did get to do some work, however. He finished the sole on one sandal(caligae), and built two sword straps(balteus). He repaired shoes for two different women, and made adjustments to the belts of about ten Asian men (word gets around). He came to realize that when he was working, he was ignoring the people, so he would work until a crowd gathered then answer questions until the crowds were gone...He got about one hour's work done in the two days! So many children wanted to try on the equipment, that Legion XXX has decided to build some small versions of their equipment for the next season.
Bob wishes to take this opportunity to thank both Pam Cross and Genevieve for their help, patience, and resourcefulness in bringing this event to a successful conclusion.

Our trusty Quinton Johanson of Legion XXIV and Lee Holeva of Legion XXX, along with others and wives and children were kept busy answering may inquiries about our equipment, weapons and the Roman Military. There was there with his new chariot, along with two horses to pose with it. The original chariot was lost in an auto accident and the new one was even better than the first, however, the chariot did suffer a collapse on Saturday afternoon when several portly Roman senators and politicians climbed aboard for some pictures. It was repaired on Sunday morning and served well throughout the day.

Both days were warm and pleasant, with reasonable humidity. On Saturday the troops did two tacticals, but with only four soldiers, it really did not come-off all that well, so on Sunday no tacticals were held, but ongoing pila drills, catapulta demonstrations and camp lectures seemed to keep the public satisfied. The siege engines of Legions XXIV and XXX were kept busy during both days serving up lengthy shots of SCA arrow bolts and tennis balls. Due to the lack of a protected range, shots with serious "live round" arrow bolt and dart ammunition were curtailed to only a few. A high point for XXIV's Engine of Terror came on Saturday morning when a prototype arrow-dart was sent an estimated 300 feet, sailing well beyond the limits of the range. Unfortunately, the dart point broke off upon impact and due to the unsecured shooting area, no further attempts were made with the arrow-darts.

WEBSTER TIMELINE EVENT AFTER ACTION REPORT
Senator Marcus Minucius-Tiberius Audens submitted this report on his attendance at this event, which took place while the Commander and trooper "Quinius" Johanson were up north at the Pompeii Exhibit in Ottawa, Ontario.
Our thanks to Senator and Engineer Audens for his report.

To: Commander Legio XXIV and Commander Legio III "Cyrenaica"
I arrived at the Webster Military Timeline Event on Sunday in mid-morning with my driver and pack train. The Legio III "Cyrenaica" milles were already on-site, with tents and displays already set up. I quickly added my small number of elements to the display, which included a papyrus map of the Eastern Roman Empire, models of a signal /survey tower, a pontoon bridge, and a "pier" bridge, and some miscellaneous weapons both real and practice.
Due to the one day at the event, I did not set up my field office as usual, but rather enjoyed the shelter of the Optio's tent and fly. My thanks to the Legion III Optio for his very kind hospitality and initiation to this event.
Once set up, I took a young member of the Auxila, and two slings, and took them down to the pond to practice. Our practice session was not all that successful, and after about an hour returned to the Legio camp.
Towards the end of the day as the area cleared of other reenactors, the Legionaries and Auxila practiced with spears and Pilums. The Legio's new Auxila Scout produced his sling which was of a different design, and looked to be more efficient and better constructed. He generously offered the new sling for practice and the results were excellent, far better than before at the pond. So much so, that I have determined to build another sling along the same design.
In the mid-afternoon, we were about the only remaining unit on the hill, so with the lack of spectators, and the practice with spear and pilum over, we began to break camp. My pac train and driver arriving at the appointed time. We packed the camp and departed shortly thereafter.
Again my thanks to the Optio of Legio III "Cyrenaica" for his kind invitation and kinder hospitality. It was much appreciated.
Legio III suggestions discussed at the event:
---- Expansion of the "miles Immunes" part of the legio, with their particular skills displayed;
----Pursuit of the slingers and archers and their equipment / weapons / dress as part of the Auxila;
---"Roma Victrix!!!"---
Respectfully Submitted;
Marcus Minucius-Tiberius Audens


TIME LINE at CHARLESTOWN, NH SEPT 24-25
Ed Jadaszewski would like to put out an invitation to a time line event at "The Fort at #4" this September 24-25, 2005.
The event is in Charlestown, New Hampshire on the Vermont border. The site is beautiful and reenactment-friendly, and they hope to make this an annual event. Suttlers and any kinds of period demos are also welcomed, and of course, camping and campfires are permitted. For more information, the website is http://www.fortat4.com , and please contact Eric if you are interested, jrjada@....

CASTRA ROMANA NOV. 4 - 6
From Rusty Myers, Justus Rustius Longinus, 843-437-5587 justuslonginus@... of Legio VI Ferrata Fidelas Constans.


Knowing it is a bit of a drive for most, we are pulling out all the stops (including lots of new stuff!!) to make this an experience you will not want to miss, and will never forget!

While this event will be advertised and open to the public, our primary goal is to provide a unique experience to our participants. To this end we have a great number of events which will interest the Roman Reenactor, be they soldier or civilian! This will include a period smithy, Roman Vendors, potter, baker, Presentations, and more. If you have a unique impression you would like to bring and add, please contact us. There is no cost to our participants for any of the events they can participate in or for the encampment itself. The last years have been an outstanding success, and this year will be even better!

Soldiers will get the opportunity to drill and train with double weighted weapons, throw live pila on the pila range, practice live sword (against a post of course!), in addition to participating in Needlefelt mock combat both on the drill field for spectators Saturday, and in the woods on Sunday, you will see the Gladiators in the arena in daylight, and at a special torchlight nighttime match just before the Grand Convivia! We will also have Military Games, a 1.5 mile road march (there are Celts about... bring your Needlefelts), guard mount, pay issue (yes, you will get your 75 Denarii... minus a bit for the Centurion...), and more.

The highlight of the event will be the Centurios Convivium, a grande Roman Banquet prepared by our gourmet Roman Chef the Lady Helvia Elena Claudilla, and hosted by the Centurio. Ask anyone about our feast! The food alone is worth the drive!

Average Temperature in November in South Carolina is 65-75 degrees. In addition there are few if any events on the calendar for that period of time. Plus the mosquitoes are mostly dead! Legio VI will be onsite Thursday the 3rd to Monday the 7th, but you should try to arrive sometime Thursday or Friday unless you are setting up a special event or station. Re-enacting events start Friday night. Vendors are welcome to set up a display, but we ask that they remain in period as much as they are able, and you must contact us as soon as possible. We have limited room for vendors, but will endeavor to accommodate you in the period market, or vendor row. Remember this event is being planned for the participants, so we need you to attend! Please RSVP via EMAIL by October 1st with firm numbers if at all possible (this is so we can plan the feast).

It is our sincerest hope you will plan to attend. We will have an excellent time, and want you to be there to celebrate the growth of Roman Living Archeology, at the best Castra Romana EVER!








FOR SALE
Charles Pecquet of Legion XX is selling his kit as a set, with an asking price of $1500. Deepeeka Gallic H helmet (a good one, before they ruined the back!), Museum Replicas "Newstead" lorica, plus scutum, Pompeii gladius, tunic, caligae, belt with pugio, pilum, cloak with pin, pack pole and bag, and a canteen. Contact him for photos and more details, thepecquets@...
or 504-276-9001.


AND PLEASE REMEMBER to keep me updated on your e-mail, phone and other address info. If your e-mail
goes bad and I don't have any other info, you become "MIA" "Missing in Action", or more likely "Inaction"
and I do have a number of those, way too many, already.
Please advise me of your status and continued interest in the Legion? legionxxiv@...
Thank you for your attention to this.

UPCOMING CAMPAIGNS for LEGION XXIV and OTHER EVENTS for 2005
These events are not on our official schedule, but our members are most encouraged to take part.
*** September 24-25 Time Line Event at Fort #4, Charlestown, NH contact Eric, jrjada@....
*** October 22-23 Possible Ren Faire appearance, Waterloo Village, Netcong, NJ, I-80-exit 25 11AM-5PM
*** November 4-6 Castra Romana of Legio VI Ferrata Fidelas Constans, Givhans State Park in South Carolina.
Rusty Myers, Justus Rustius Longinus, 843-437-5587 justuslonginus@...

Thanking you for your continued support of Legion XXIV, I remain;

Yours in the Bonds of Ancient Rome

Gallio / George



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37401 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Multae sententiae de constitutione et de lege constitutiva
Salve
well the Cornelia are still here. some of us.
vale



Marcus Cornelius Felix
magewuffa@...

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Diana Octavia Aventina
<dianaaventina@y...> wrote:
> Salve Piscinus,
>
> < We did not leave due to the
> > superabundance of
> > regulation, but over how some magistrates did not
> > abide by those
> > regulae and instead abused the authority of their
> > offices. Old
> > issues I won't go into again.
>
> There are also a bunch of citizens who left because of
> you. You do bring a wealth of information back with
> you and for that I am glad. You've brought new life to
> the Religio list. It's too bad that the citizens of
> Gens Cornelia don't come back as well.
>
> The old NR of 1999-2001, no longer exists. Even with
> the fighting that took place, at least this place had
> spirit....
>
> Diana Octavia
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37402 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
SALVETE OMNES !

When I have looking to the links, I saw a painting of Alma Tadema. Very nice paintings. I saw that paintings somewhere in the spring, and, I use one or two to the aedilis cohors web site. For all who are interested in paintings - a link :
http://www.goodart.org/artoflat.htm

VALETE,
IVL SABINVS

gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Paulinus brought up a question in my mind, and here are the results:

http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Greek.htm

http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Egyptian.htm

http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Coins.htm



Compare the ancient portraits to these, modern ones:

http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Modern.htm



She kinda looks like Cher in some of the modern ones :-)

Valete bene,

Cato

(all images copywrite by http://sangha.net/messengers/)



>
> Well from her busts and coins I would agree but she was not a
beauty
> by the standards of "our time" but maybe was considered attractive
> then.





---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------






"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37403 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
SALVE !

I'm not agree with this ideea. She was not dark. Don't forget her
genealogy. Her ancestors was from Macedonia. Ptolomeu I Soter was
general in the Alexander army. Cleopatra was the 7th Cleopatra from
the dinasty . Anyway the egiptians aren't dark.

VALE,
IVL SABINVS


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> Thats from the modern and I dare say politically
> correct stance that she is from Africa so she MUST BE
> dark. Very few folks even heard or know of the
> Ptolomies
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mlcinnyc@y...>
> wrote:
> > G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.
> >
> > Salvete omnes.
> >
> > Paulinus brought up a question in my mind, and here
> are the results:
> >
> > http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Greek.htm
> >
> > http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Egyptian.htm
> >
> > http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Coins.htm
> >
> >
> >
> > Compare the ancient portraits to these, modern ones:
> >
> > http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Modern.htm
> >
> >
> >
> > She kinda looks like Cher in some of the modern ones
> :-)
> >
> > Valete bene,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> > (all images copywrite by
> http://sangha.net/messengers/)
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Well from her busts and coins I would agree but
> she was not a
> > beauty
> > > by the standards of "our time" but maybe was
> considered attractive
> > > then.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37404 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
SALVE !

Look what I find about this topic :

"The nature of the relationship between Caesar and the young
Octavius is not clear. Dio claims (45.1.2) that after Octavius
reached maturity (in 48 BC), Caesar took him in and began training
him to be his successor. This assertion is clearly more informed by
later imperial behavior than by Late Republican practice, and is
unlikely in any case, since Caesar was much occupied with the civil
wars at this time (49-45 BC). There is no evidence that the two
actually met before Octavius was in his mid-teens, but that the
dictator noticed Octavius is hardly to be doubted. Suetonius (Aug.
8.1) presents a more likely series of events. In 48 BC the young
Octavius was elected to the pontifical college. When Caesar
celebrated his multiple triumphs in September 46 BC, Octavius took
part in the procession and was accorded military honors. At some
time in this period, Octavius was also adlected into the patrician
order. He then followed Caesar to Spain when the latter went to
fight the Pompeians at Munda (45 BC). He earned the admiration of
the dictator for the daring of his journey, which included a
shipwreck; he was to show this same daring repeatedly in future
months and years. In 44 BC Caesar nominated the magistrates several
years in advance (another shunning of tradition on Caesar's part),
and the young man was included as his Master of Horse for 43 or 42
BC. Despite these indications of favor, it is fair to say that in
the broad scheme of things Octavius was a non-player and a political
nobody in March 44 BC, when his great-uncle was killed."

OPTIME VALE,
IVL SABINVS



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, JOEY NICOLE KING <metelliana@y...>
wrote:
> Salvete,
>
> I have a question. How much contact did Octavius have with his
uncle before Caesars death?
>
> Valete,
> Metelliana
>
> "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
> Salvete!
>
> This is a great topic for conversation. I have heard different
views
> about Augustus over the years both good and bad but overall I have
> come to the conclusion that he was a shrewd politician who was
able
> to outwit the more military minded generals. The fall of the
> republic was a forgone conclusion set in motion before his time.
>
> When I think of Rome's golden age I think of Augustus; under his
> administration Rome and her empire were really set on its feet
with
> Pax Romana. In comparison to other men and emperors of his time I
> thought he did vey well. He seemed to be more Stoic in the way he
> lived avoiding lavish lifestyles, trying to set some sorts of
moral
> codes. Even Cleopatra who knocked two tough generals off their
feet
> was unable to drag the younger Augustus to the sack; if she was
the
> great intellectual enchantress and beauty by the standards of
those
> times, she never phased the stronger character of Augustus which
> showed that his privates did not rule his brain.
>
> You can find fault with every human in the world; even Mother
Teresa
> and many writers have mentioned his short comings and weaknesses..
> Overall however you did not get to such a position and let alone
> hold it for such a long time by being weak in character and stupid
> intellectually; in short, my hat goes off to Augustus. I think his
> benevolence and service to Rome far exceeds his house cleaning
> earlier on.
>
> Now these are just my personal thoughts and do not mean this to be
> an academic exercise so I haven't hit the books for quotes,
> critiques etc.
>
> Regards.
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, laurent_coffre@b... wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Salvete,
> >
> > In an effort to keep political and other boring stuff at bay, I
> copy below
> > something I sent to the Britannia list some time ago when we were
> > discussing the role Octavianus played in the fall of the
republic.
> The
> > question, of course, has not been settled so I thought I could
> poke around
> > and see if some of you would like to comment and offer
suggestions
> or more
> > evidence on what I have written ;-)
> > I would be happy to provide my sources if anybody is
interested...
> >
> > So here it goes below,
> >
> > Valete
> >
> > Laureatus
> >
> > xxxxxx
> >
> > Thank you both for taking interest in the discussion. I would
> like, if I
> > may, express a couple of things that prompted me to write on
this
> list
> > about Octavius/Octavianus/Caesar/Augustus.
> >
> > Quite apart from any other consideration, his very name, as seen
> above, has
> > evolved over the years reflecting perhaps that the young man and
> the older
> > stateman were quite different. It may also indicate that
Augustus
> knew how
> > to adapt to the different situations he faced and made the right
> choice at
> > the right time, ie phasing out Octavianus for Caesar. Both
> cognomina were
> > already in his full name but he chose the latter to be addressed
> when he
> > started his political career. In other words, he knew what he
was
> doing and
> > what trick to use to gather popular support.
> > But he could also have done so to honour the memory of his
> assassinated
> > “father” so the revenge argument is also valid.
> >
> > The young Octavianus was only 18 when Caesar died. I don’t
know
> about you
> > but when I was 18, I was nowhere near capable enough of mounting
a
> > succesful coup! One could argue that Romans matured faster (?)
or
> rather
> > that their abilities as adults were recognised earlier so that
> Octavius was
> > seen as an equal by his peers. But I doubt that. I have read
that
> he was
> > not immune against mockery and there seems to be indications
that
> some
> > Senators did not take him seriously. Indeed, it is good to
> remember that
> > the most junior magistracy, the quaestorship, was not available
> for men
> > under the age of 30. So it is very possible to imagine that when
> Octavius
> > arrived in Rome he had a hard time to convince people that he
> would be a
> > serious contendant.
> >
> > Furthermore, Octavius came from a relatively unknown family with
no
> > consular to speak of. He had done nothing in particular to be
> noticed by
> > his contemporaries, he had held no office, fought no battles. He
> was too
> > young and a nobody. Of course age is not always relevant: One
can
> turn to
> > other examples of young men achieving great things, Alexander or
> Bonaparte
> > for instance. Those two generals, however, were exceptional
> soldiers and
> > earned their legitimacy for their later rule through their
> abilities and
> > successes in war. Octavius did not have this opportunity.
> > If I had been a bookmaker in the summer of 44BC, I don’t think
I
> would have
> > bet my old shirt on him to rule the Urbs.
> >
> > So, how did he do it? Did he have plans laid out and set out to
> usurp
> > power? Did he really want revenge against the murderers of his
> “father”
> > when no one else of substance and other relatives and friends
> stood up to
> > do just that? Did he get caught in the events and was lucky,
> sometimes
> > ruthless, in his decision making so that he would survive?
> >
> > I do not have an answer but I would investigate the matter along
> two lines
> > that could shed some light on my questions:
> >
> > 1. He was Caesar’s heir. That, in my opinion, is the single
most
> important
> > fact to explain his head start. Just by having been adopted,
> Octavius had
> > at his disposal a colossal fortune, the largest numbers of
clients
> who
> > passed traditionally from the deceased patron to his heir and
the
> support
> > of Caesar’s veterans. This would certainly be enough for
anybody
> to
> > emphasize the “Caesar” part of one’s name to take full
> advantage of the
> > situation. Antonius, it must be said, was not fooled and,
> unsuccesfully,
> > tried to keep the fortune and manage it “on behalf” of the
> heir…
> >
> > 2. Octavianus, the triumvir, and Augustus, the princeps, built
> some kind of
> > unwritten “constitution” (the word is ill chosen, please
> forgive me) that
> > looked more like a patchwork than a planned project. He took the
> old
> > Republican institutions, kept their democratic appearance but
> tweaked them
> > so that, effectively, he retained and centralised power long
> enough in the
> > hand of one man, his own, to acquire enough dignitas and wealth.
> Then as
> > the ultimate patron he yielded enough influence over his
clients,
> or
> > subjects, who comprised by then the whole citizen body.
> >
> > My instinct, at this point is to think the following. A very
> intelligent
> > and shrewd young man inherits the greatest wealth and influence
of
> the then
> > known world. These were troubled times, and although he might
not
> have
> > wanted it, he had to use the resources at his disposal first to
> survive,
> > then to consolidate his power so that he would not be
threatened.
> Colossal
> > resources called for colossal changes. It is worth noting that
the
> ageing
> > Augustus took great pains to ensure a return to morals and was
more
> > inclined to clementia when his ennemies were no more. He did not
> need to be
> > ruthless anymore, he did not fear for his life anymore.
> > The only thing we can be disappointed with, as modern students
and
> with
> > hindsight, is that he did not restore the Republic when peace
and
> posperity
> > had returned. Perhaps we could discuss that in another thread
but
> I doubt
> > the question really bothered the 90% of the non elite population
> who were
> > probably better off and rather prefered to give away some of the
> liberty
> > they never had for a peace they could feel!
> >
> > So, in conclusion, who is to blame for the principate, if there
is
> blame to
> > be assigned? Octavius who navigated the troubled water or the
> conditions
> > that created the heavy seas? And to go back to the original
> question,
> > linked to the previous one: Was Octavius a conscious tyrant or
> simply a man
> > of his time playing the cards life had dealt him?
> >
> >
>
_____________________________________________________________________
> > Confidentiality Notice: The information in this document and
> attachments is confidential and may also be legally privileged. It
> is intended only for the use of the named recipient.
> > Internet communications are not secure and therefore British
> American Tobacco does not accept legal responsibility for the
> contents of this message.
> > If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us
> immediately and then delete this document. Do not disclose the
> contents of this document to any other person, nor take any copies.
> > Violation of this notice may be unlawful.
> >
>
_____________________________________________________________________
> _
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The roman empire
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37405 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
G. Equitius Cato T. Iulio Sabino quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

"At the age of four he lost his father [59 B.C.]. In his twelfth year
he delivered a funeral oration to the assembled people in honour of
his grandmother Julia. Four years later, after assuming the gown of
manhood, he received military prizes at Caesar's African triumph,
although he had taken no part in the war on account of his youth. When
his uncle presently went to Spain to engage the sons of Pompeius [46
B.C.], although Augustus had hardly yet recovered his strength after a
severe illness, he followed over roads beset by the enemy with only a
very few companions, and that too after suffering shipwreck, and
thereby greatly endeared himself to Caesar, who soon formed a high
opinion of his character over and above the energy with which he had
made the journey. When Caesar, after recovering the Spanish provinces,
planned an expedition against the Dacians and then against the
Parthians, Augustus, who had been sent on in advance to Apollonia,
devoted his leisure to study. As soon as he learned that his uncle had
been slain and that he was his heir [44 B.C.], he was in doubt for
some time whether to appeal to the nearest legions, but gave up the
idea as hasty and premature. He did, however, return to the city and
enter upon his inheritance, in spite of the doubts of his mother and
the strong opposition of his stepfather, the ex-consul Marcius
Philippus. Then he levied armies and henceforth ruled the State, at
first with Marcus Antonius and Marcus Lepidus, then with Antonius
alone for nearly twelve years, and finally by himself for forty-four."
- Seutonius, The Lives of the Caesars, "The Deified Augustus" 8

So it appears that Octavius was not sure of his position after
Caesar's death; this would only be true if, as the author quoted by
Sabinus, he was not yet a real "player" in the quagmire of Roman
politics.

"When Caesar's will was read, however, Antony received a nasty shock.
In it Caesar named as his chief heir a virtual unknown by the name of
C. Octavius, adopting him (posthumously) as his son. Octavius was
Caesar's grand-nephew on his sister's side, a rather sickly
18-year-old with only limited political and military experience. Upon
his adoption, Octavius became C. Julius Caesar Octavianus (or, in
English, simply Octavian). Antony might well have expected little
trouble in dealing with a youth of so little experience, few political
connections, and virtually no personal authority. Unfortunately,
Antony failed to recognize that in Octavian he was dealing with a
natural born politician. Octavian never was an imposing figure
physically, and he owed his military victories largely to the skill of
his able lieutenants." - John Porter, University of Saskatchewan, 1995

This idea is bolstered by letters written by Cicero:

"....But I would like to know, how was the arrival of Octavius,
whether there was any crowd rushing to him, whether there was any
suspicion of a revolution. I think not, indeed; but nevertheless,
whatever it was like, I want to know...." - Cicero to Atticus (Ad Att.
14.5) Apr. 11, 44 B.C. Astura

"....Octavius came to Naples on April 18...[and it is reported that]
he will accept his inheritance. But, as you write, that will be a
great quarrel with Antony!..." - Cicero to Atticus (Ad Att. 14.10)
Apr. 19, 44 B.C. Cumae

"....With us here, full of respect and full of friendship, is
Octavius, whom his own people greet as Caesar; but [his host] does
not, and so we do not either. That I deny to be possible for a good
citizen. So many stand around us, who even threaten our friends with
death....What do you judge [will happen], when the boy comes to Rome,
where our liberators are not able to be safe? They, indeed, always
will be famous, and in the consciousness of their deed even happy. But
we, unless I am deceived, shall fall flat...." - Cicero to Atticus (Ad
Att. 14.12) Apr. 22, 44 B.C. Puteoli

"....From Octavian every day there is a letter—that I undertake
his business, that I come to Capua, that a second time I save the Res
Publica, that anyway I come to Rome....He has however acted very
vigorously, and he is still. To Rome he will come with a great army,
but he is so clearly a boy!...." - Cicero to Atticus (Ad Att. 16.11)
Nov. 5, 44 B.C. Puteoli

And further supported by letters written by Brutus:

"....Beyond your prudence—which you have in abundance—nothing
from you is asked for except moderation in the giving out of high
offices. All other things you have so much that with those of anyone
you like of the ancients your good qualities could be compared: this
one thing, from a grateful and generous spirit begun, is asked for: a
more cautious and a more moderate generosity. For in no way ought the
Senate to give to anyone what for those thinking in an evil way might
provide an example or an advantage. And so I fear, concerning the
consulship, lest that Caesar of yours think that he has climbed up so
high, by your decrees, that from there—if he is made
consul—he might
not climb down." - Brutus to Cicero (Ad Brut. 11) May 15, 43 B.C.

"That in every case Cicero has acted with the best spirit, I know; for
what to me could be more convincing than his spirit regarding the Res
Publica?....I don't know what to write to you except this one thing:
the boy's greediness and lawlessness have rather been excited than
repressed by Cicero, and he has handed over to him such a great amount
of indulgence, that he cannot restrain himself from malicious
remarks...." - Brutus to Atticus (Ad Brut. 17) early June, 43 B.C.


The letters of Cicero and Brutus seem to point to a young,
inexperienced (politically) man who was thrust onto the stage of
Republican politics --- and liked it. A lot. Gradually it became
clear that Octavius was very good at manipulating the great men around
him, and was given enormous leeway, enabling him to build for himself
an incredible foundation of political power. Brutus' fears proved
true.

Valete bene,

Cato




SOURCES

Cicero's Letters translations copyright Lewis Stiles, University of
Saskatchewan, 1995
(http://duke.usask.ca/~porterj/DeptTransls/CicLetters.html)

Comnmentary on Caesar's will copyright John Porter, University of
Saskatchewan, 1995 (http://www.historyinfilm.com/c
laudius/overview.htm)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37406 From: marcushoratius Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: Multae sententiae
Salva sis Diana Octavia

Pompeia did not recall, but of course I did remember that you were
newly arrived in Nova Roma back in 2000-2001. Not exactly back in
Nova Roma's infancy as you claimed. You joined gens Moravia after I
did. That was why when you needed to establish your former
citizenship as a Moravia with the censores, you came to me for
help.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Diana Octavia Aventina
<dianaaventina@y...> wrote:
> Salve Piscinus,
>
> < We did not leave due to the
> > superabundance of
> > regulation, but over how some magistrates did not
> > abide by those
> > regulae and instead abused the authority of their
> > offices. Old
> > issues I won't go into again.
>
> There are also a bunch of citizens who left because of
> you.

Probably true. After all, as the first consul of Societas Via
Romana and as pontifex maximus in its Collegium Religionis I did
help set standards for civil discussion and tolerance of the
opinions of all our sodales. There has never been a single incident
in SVR where someone flamed another, or resorted to personal
insults, or childish name-calling, as was all too common on Nova
Roma's lists in the past. Nor have we tolerated anyone bashing the
religious faith of others, or tolerated anyone attacking a person
because they hold to a different religious faith. Some people
appreciate a place where they can hold civil discussions on Roma
antiqua in a friendly atmosphere, and it is quite true that about
half the sodales of SVR have come from Nova Roma because they did
find a welcoming, friendly atmosphere in the Societas Via Romana. If
you wish to claim that by contributing towards making SVR into what
it is that I helped attract cives away from Nova Roma, then some
might wonder what it was about Nova Roma that made them leave?



>You do bring a wealth of information back with
> you and for that I am glad. You've brought new life to
> the Religio list.

Gratias. I am yet a student of the religio Romana, still researching
all the time, and as always I am willing to share whatever I learn.


>It's too bad that the citizens of
> Gens Cornelia don't come back as well.
>

Yes, Livia Cornelia was a valuable asset to Nova Roma. A most
active propraetor, and she was very active, too, in the
sodalitates. Hard working, honest, incorruptible. But then those
were her qualities that led some in gens Cornelia to hound her away,
and if you will recall it was Vado, he who had welcomed you to Nova
Roma, and a good portion of the Senate, as well as I and other
Moravii in filial pietas for Vado, who left over the mistreatment
that she and others were receiving in that former Nova Roma.


> The old NR of 1999-2001, no longer exists. Even with
> the fighting that took place, at least this place had
> spirit....
>
> Diana Octavia
>

Good. I am glad to hear that the old NR nolonger exists. Better
for everyone to leave it that way.

Vale
M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37407 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: House of Ptolemy (offshoot of 'From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?')
T. Octavius Salvius G. Equitio Catoni S.P.D


> Paulinus brought up a question in my mind, and here are the
results:


> Compare the ancient portraits to these, modern ones:
>

>
>
>
> She kinda looks like Cher in some of the modern ones :-)
>

That made me laugh! The legacy of the House of Ptolemy is not the
Pharos or the Library of Alexandria, but the original Cher.

Incidentally, have you come across 'A History of the Ptolemaic
Empire' by Gunther Holbl? I've just picked it up again after a year,
and it's a fascinating read, although it's really very difficult to
keep up with the Kings, what with the very unorigianl naming system
they had.

vale

T. Octavius Salvius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37408 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
I agree with you. I know she Was a blonde. But most
Americans if they were asked would say that Hannibal &
Cleopatra are black.They wont accept otherwise.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
> SALVE !
>
> I'm not agree with this ideea. She was not dark.
Don't forget her
> genealogy. Her ancestors was from Macedonia.
Ptolomeu I Soter was
> general in the Alexander army. Cleopatra was the 7th
Cleopatra from
> the dinasty . Anyway the egiptians aren't dark.
>
> VALE,
> IVL SABINVS
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
> <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> > Thats from the modern and I dare say politically
> > correct stance that she is from Africa so she MUST
BE
> > dark. Very few folks even heard or know of the
> > Ptolomies
> > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mlcinnyc@y...>
> > wrote:
> > > G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.
> > >
> > > Salvete omnes.
> > >
> > > Paulinus brought up a question in my mind, and
here
> > are the results:
> > >
> > > http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Greek.htm
> > >
> > >
http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Egyptian.htm
> > >
> > > http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Coins.htm
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Compare the ancient portraits to these, modern
ones:
> > >
> > >
http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Modern.htm
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > She kinda looks like Cher in some of the modern
ones
> > :-)
> > >
> > > Valete bene,
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > > (all images copywrite by
> > http://sangha.net/messengers/)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Well from her busts and coins I would agree
but
> > she was not a
> > > beauty
> > > > by the standards of "our time" but maybe was
> > considered attractive
> > > > then.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > S P Q R
> >
> > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> >
> > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > Roman Citizen
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37409 From: mfalco1 Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> I agree with you. I know she Was a blonde. But most
> Americans if they were asked would say that Hannibal &
> Cleopatra are black.They wont accept otherwise.
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> <iulius_sabinus@y...> wrote:
> > SALVE !
> >
> > I'm not agree with this ideea. She was not dark.
> Don't forget her
> > genealogy. Her ancestors was from Macedonia.
> Ptolomeu I Soter was
> > general in the Alexander army. Cleopatra was the 7th
> Cleopatra from
> > the dinasty . Anyway the egiptians aren't dark.
> >
> > VALE,
> > IVL SABINVS
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
> > <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> > > Thats from the modern and I dare say politically
> > > correct stance that she is from Africa so she MUST
> BE
> > > dark. Very few folks even heard or know of the
> > > Ptolomies
> > > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mlcinnyc@y...>
> > > wrote:
> > > > G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.
> > > >
> > > > Salvete omnes.
> > > >
> > > > Paulinus brought up a question in my mind, and
> here
> > > are the results:
> > > >
> > > > http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Greek.htm
> > > >
> > > >
> http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Egyptian.htm
> > > >
> > > > http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Coins.htm
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Compare the ancient portraits to these, modern
> ones:
> > > >
> > > >
> http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Modern.htm
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > She kinda looks like Cher in some of the modern
> ones
> > > :-)
> > > >
> > > > Valete bene,
> > > >
> > > > Cato
> > > >
> > > > (all images copywrite by
> > > http://sangha.net/messengers/)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Well from her busts and coins I would agree
> but
> > > she was not a
> > > > beauty
> > > > > by the standards of "our time" but maybe was
> > > considered attractive
> > > > > then.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > S P Q R
> > >
> > > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> > >
> > > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > > Roman Citizen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37410 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Rome Mini-series
Salve,

Well, did anyone else watch it tonight? If so what was your opinion of it?
Thumb's up or Thumb's down. I give it two thumb's UP. And if any of our
historians saw it what are your pro's and con's on it. Also, how realistic
was the battle scene with the legionaries rotating on the command of the
Centurion's whistle so there were fresh fighters in the front of the
formation.

Vale,

Quintus Sevilius Priscus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37411 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Salve

its because of PC run amuck


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus



----- Original Message -----
From: raymond fuentes<mailto:praefectus2324@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 10:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?


I agree with you. I know she Was a blonde. But most
Americans if they were asked would say that Hannibal &
Cleopatra are black.They wont accept otherwise.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
<iulius_sabinus@...<mailto:iulius_sabinus@...>> wrote:
> SALVE !
>
> I'm not agree with this ideea. She was not dark.
Don't forget her
> genealogy. Her ancestors was from Macedonia.
Ptolomeu I Soter was
> general in the Alexander army. Cleopatra was the 7th
Cleopatra from
> the dinasty . Anyway the egiptians aren't dark.
>
> VALE,
> IVL SABINVS
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
> <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> > Thats from the modern and I dare say politically
> > correct stance that she is from Africa so she MUST
BE
> > dark. Very few folks even heard or know of the
> > Ptolomies
> > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mlcinnyc@y...>
> > wrote:
> > > G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.
> > >
> > > Salvete omnes.
> > >
> > > Paulinus brought up a question in my mind, and
here
> > are the results:
> > >
> > > http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Greek.htm<http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Greek.htm>
> > >
> > >
http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Egyptian.htm<http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Egyptian.htm>
> > >
> > > http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Coins.htm<http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Coins.htm>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Compare the ancient portraits to these, modern
ones:
> > >
> > >
http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Modern.htm<http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Modern.htm>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > She kinda looks like Cher in some of the modern
ones
> > :-)
> > >
> > > Valete bene,
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > > (all images copywrite by
> > http://sangha.net/messengers/)<http://sangha.net/messengers/)>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Well from her busts and coins I would agree
but
> > she was not a
> > > beauty
> > > > by the standards of "our time" but maybe was
> > considered attractive
> > > > then.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > S P Q R
> >
> > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> >
> > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > Roman Citizen
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com<http://mail.yahoo.com/>
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs<http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs>



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37412 From: mfalco1 Date: 2005-08-28
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Salvete Omnes,

I have to add that Cleopatra was not only descended from the European
Ptolemy Line, but also was a granddaughter of Mithridates the Great
of Pontus. Half her blood line was semetic and it shows in her busts
with her strong jawline and huge nose. She may not have been dark as
in being "African" looking but she must have been darker than the
average European. Let's also not forget, that the Alexandrians and
the native Egyptians were two different peoples.

Pax
Falco


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> I agree with you. I know she Was a blonde. But most
> Americans if they were asked would say that Hannibal &
> Cleopatra are black.They wont accept otherwise.
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> <iulius_sabinus@y...> wrote:
> > SALVE !
> >
> > I'm not agree with this ideea. She was not dark.
> Don't forget her
> > genealogy. Her ancestors was from Macedonia.
> Ptolomeu I Soter was
> > general in the Alexander army. Cleopatra was the 7th
> Cleopatra from
> > the dinasty . Anyway the egiptians aren't dark.
> >
> > VALE,
> > IVL SABINVS
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
> > <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> > > Thats from the modern and I dare say politically
> > > correct stance that she is from Africa so she MUST
> BE
> > > dark. Very few folks even heard or know of the
> > > Ptolomies
> > > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mlcinnyc@y...>
> > > wrote:
> > > > G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.
> > > >
> > > > Salvete omnes.
> > > >
> > > > Paulinus brought up a question in my mind, and
> here
> > > are the results:
> > > >
> > > > http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Greek.htm
> > > >
> > > >
> http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Egyptian.htm
> > > >
> > > > http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Coins.htm
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Compare the ancient portraits to these, modern
> ones:
> > > >
> > > >
> http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Modern.htm
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > She kinda looks like Cher in some of the modern
> ones
> > > :-)
> > > >
> > > > Valete bene,
> > > >
> > > > Cato
> > > >
> > > > (all images copywrite by
> > > http://sangha.net/messengers/)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Well from her busts and coins I would agree
> but
> > > she was not a
> > > > beauty
> > > > > by the standards of "our time" but maybe was
> > > considered attractive
> > > > > then.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > S P Q R
> > >
> > > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> > >
> > > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > > Roman Citizen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37413 From: richard france Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
Salve Cato,
Fortunately I am not interested in the polotics ! Too much back stabbing. As for the lull, it must be a two year lull.I do appreciate your e-mail, and hope we shall get to know each other in Rome.I knew surely I would get some replies from my e-mail. I want to be a very active member of Nova Roma, and do anything I can to help.
Vale,
Lucius Claudius

gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
G. Equitius Cato L. Claudio Romulo S.P.D.

Salve Romulus!

Rome is not empty; we've all just gone to Sorrentum for the August
holidays :-)

One small thing that may have kept the Forum a little quieter than
usual (as far as I'm concerned at least) is a vow I made not to talk
about law or politics for one week. The week is almost up (it ends
Wednesday, 31 August)...

Vale bene,

Cato







SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37414 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Another factoid that is relatively unknown & goes
unmentioned in the dont offend anyone USA. The folks
in Alexandria thumbed thier noses at native Kemeti.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mfalco1@...>
wrote:
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> I have to add that Cleopatra was not only descended
from the European
> Ptolemy Line, but also was a granddaughter of
Mithridates the Great
> of Pontus. Half her blood line was semetic and it
shows in her busts
> with her strong jawline and huge nose. She may not
have been dark as
> in being "African" looking but she must have been
darker than the
> average European. Let's also not forget, that the
Alexandrians and
> the native Egyptians were two different peoples.
>
> Pax
> Falco
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
> <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> > I agree with you. I know she Was a blonde. But
most
> > Americans if they were asked would say that
Hannibal &
> > Cleopatra are black.They wont accept otherwise.
> > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > <iulius_sabinus@y...> wrote:
> > > SALVE !
> > >
> > > I'm not agree with this ideea. She was not dark.
> > Don't forget her
> > > genealogy. Her ancestors was from Macedonia.
> > Ptolomeu I Soter was
> > > general in the Alexander army. Cleopatra was the
7th
> > Cleopatra from
> > > the dinasty . Anyway the egiptians aren't dark.
> > >
> > > VALE,
> > > IVL SABINVS
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond
fuentes
> > > <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> > > > Thats from the modern and I dare say
politically
> > > > correct stance that she is from Africa so she
MUST
> > BE
> > > > dark. Very few folks even heard or know of the
> > > > Ptolomies
> > > > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mlcinnyc@y...>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.
> > > > >
> > > > > Salvete omnes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Paulinus brought up a question in my mind,
and
> > here
> > > > are the results:
> > > > >
> > > > >
http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Greek.htm
> > > > >
> > > > >
> >
http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Egyptian.htm
> > > > >
> > > > >
http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Coins.htm
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Compare the ancient portraits to these,
modern
> > ones:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Modern.htm
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > She kinda looks like Cher in some of the
modern
> > ones
> > > > :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Valete bene,
> > > > >
> > > > > Cato
> > > > >
> > > > > (all images copywrite by
> > > > http://sangha.net/messengers/)
> > > > >
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37415 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Salvete omnes!

Now this is a question that has intrigued me for years: what on earth was it
about Cleopatra that made her so desirable, so much so that Mark Antony
could not be drawn away from her? I've seen pictures of her - not just the
coin ones, but the famous bust - and in no way would one call her either
beautiful or attractive; yet Caesar and Antony couldn't resist her.

Sextus Pilatus Barbatus



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of raymond fuentes
Sent: 28 August 2005 19:50
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?



As far as Cleopara VII is concerned as we have had
this discussion in the past,an intellectual she was-
albeit lingua latina, a raving beauty she was not.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <metelliana@...>
wrote:
> Salvete,
>
> I have a question. How much contact did Octavius
have with his uncle befor
> e Caesars death?
>
> Valete,
> Metelliana
>
> "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)"
<mjk@...> wrote:
> Salvete!
>
> This is a great topic for conversation. I have heard
different views
> about Augustus over the years both good and bad but
overall I have
> come to the conclusion that he was a shrewd
politician who was able
> to outwit the more military minded generals. The
fall of the
> republic was a forgone conclusion set in motion
before his time.
>
> When I think of Rome's golden age I think of
Augustus; under his
> administration Rome and her empire were really set
on its feet with
> Pax Romana. In comparison to other men and emperors
of his time I
> thought he did vey well. He seemed to be more Stoic
in the way he
> lived avoiding lavish lifestyles, trying to set some
sorts of moral
> codes. Even Cleopatra who knocked two tough generals
off their feet
> was unable to drag the younger Augustus to the sack;
if she was the
> great intellectual enchantress and beauty by the
standards of those
> times, she never phased the stronger character of
Augustus which
> showed that his privates did not rule his brain.
>
> You can find fault with every human in the world;
even Mother Teresa
> and many writers have mentioned his short comings
and weaknesses..
> Overall however you did not get to such a position
and let alone
> hold it for such a long time by being weak in
character and stupid
> intellectually; in short, my hat goes off to
Augustus. I think his
> benevolence and service to Rome far exceeds his
house cleaning
> earlier on.
>
> Now these are just my personal thoughts and do not
mean this to be
> an academic exercise so I haven't hit the books for
quotes,
> critiques etc.
>
> Regards.
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com,
laurent_coffre@b... wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Salvete,
> >
> > In an effort to keep political and other boring
stuff at bay, I
> copy below
> > something I sent to the Britannia list some time
ago when we were
> > discussing the role Octavianus played in the fall
of the republic.
> The
> > question, of course, has not been settled so I
thought I could
> poke around
> > and see if some of you would like to comment and
offer suggestions
> or more
> > evidence on what I have written ;-)
> > I would be happy to provide my sources if anybody
is interested...
> >
> > So here it goes below,
> >
> > Valete
> >
> > Laureatus
> >
> > xxxxxx
> >
> > Thank you both for taking interest in the
discussion. I would
> like, if I
> > may, express a couple of things that prompted me
to write on this
> list
> > about Octavius/Octavianus/Caesar/Augustus.
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com



_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37416 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Multae sententiae de constitutione et de lege constitutiva
Salve Pompeia,

< Works like cold water on the face....for
> that you have my sincere thanks this morning

I'm glad to have helped.

Vale,
Diana

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37417 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Multae sententiae
Salve Moravius,

Sorry, but you're entire email is incorrect.

> Pompeia did not recall, but of course I did remember
> that you were newly arrived in Nova Roma back in
<2000-2001.

Nope, not me. Everyone seems to confuse me with
Nathalia Moravia who did indeed join NR in 2000 or
2001.

I arrived in NR in May 1999 and became a citizen of
gens Moravia in Sept 1999 (see my email below from Oct
4 1999). There were two citizens of gens Moravia then,
Vado & Aletheia. You arrived shortly after me. I left
NR in 2000 and I came back in 2002, after you had
left.

<That was why when you needed to establish your
> former citizenship as a Moravia with the censores,
<you came to me for help.

I couldn't ask you for help with the censors because
you were not in NR at the time, but with the SVR. Gens
Moravia was empty in NR, besides the Paterfamilias who
no one had heard from since a week or two after he had
joined. It was Labienus who helped me out. You
answered me via the email that you had on the SVR
website while I was looking for Vado-- and wondering
why he was no longer in NR.

But what does all this have to do with my post?

Vale,
Diana
_____

Subject: Roman name
From: "Diana Aventina" diana_aventina@--------
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 13:24:35 CEST

Greetings fellow Nova Romans!
Out of respect for Nova Roma and its' citizens, I
haven't been posting too much to this list, because I
hadn't decided on my Roman name (and din't want
to keep signing my emails with my legal name of
Joanne).
Anyway, with the help of Iulia from Arizona and Gens
Moravia (thank you my friends!),
I have come to my decision:My Roman name is Agata
Moravia (Diana)Aventina

I guess I should also mention that I am pleased to
announce that I have also been "adopted" by Gens
Moravia!

In peace,
Diana Aventina





____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37418 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: House of Ptolemy (offshoot of 'From boy to tyrant...or benefact
G. Equitius Cato T. Octavioni Salvio S.P.D.

Salve Salvius.

I haven't yet, but I did read an odd little book by Duncan Sprott
entitled "the ptolemies"; it's a history of the Ptolemies written from
the viewpoint of the God Thoth. It's a little bizarre, but a great read.

Vale bene,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "t_octavius_salvius" <fin37@h...> wrote:

> Incidentally, have you come across 'A History of the Ptolemaic
> Empire' by Gunther Holbl? I've just picked it up again after a year,
> and it's a fascinating read, although it's really very difficult to
> keep up with the Kings, what with the very unorigianl naming system
> they had.
>
> vale
>
> T. Octavius Salvius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37419 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Sorry for the English mistakes!
Salvete all,

Sorry to the English speakers out there! I keep making
mistakes like 'there' instead of 'their', 'you're'
instead of 'your' etc.! I'll have to pay more
attention.

I really need to write and speak more English. I've
forgotten so much of it since leaving the US in 1992!

Valete,
Diana




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37420 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: a.d. IV Kal. Sept.
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Today is ante diem IV Kalendas Septembris; the day is Comitialis.

"Gutta cavat lapidem, non vi sed saepe cadendo." (The drop excavates
the stone, not with force but by falling often) - Ovid, Ex Ponto

"The year passed away before the legions were brought back. Thus the
new measures were hung up and left for the new consular tribunes to
deal with. They were T. Quinctius, Ser. Cornelius, Ser. Sulpicius, Sp.
Servilius, L. Papirius, and L. Veturius. The plebs re-elected their
tribunes, at all events the same two who had brought forward the new
measures. At the very beginning of the year the final stage in the
struggle was reached. When the tribes were summoned and the proposers
refused to be thwarted by the veto of their colleagues, the
patricians, now thoroughly alarmed, took refuge in their last line of
defence - supreme power, and a supreme citizen to wield it. They
resolved upon the nomination of a Dictator, and M. Furius Camillus was
nominated; he chose L. Aemilius as his Master of the Horse. Against
such formidable preparations on the part of their opponents, the
proposers on their side prepared to defend the cause of the plebs with
the weapons of courage and resolution. They gave notice of a meeting
of the Assembly and summoned the tribes to vote. Full of anger and
menace, the Dictator, surrounded by a compact body of patricians, took
his seat, and the proceedings commenced as usual with a struggle
between those who were bringing in the bills and those who were
interposing their veto against them. The latter were in the stronger
position legally, but they were overborne by the popularity of the
measures and the men who were proposing them. The first tribes were
already voting "Aye," when Camillus said, "Since, Quirites, it is not
the authority of your tribunes but their defiance of authority that
you are ruled by now, and their right of veto, which was once secured
by the secession of the plebs, is now being rendered nugatory by the
same violent conduct by which you obtained it, I, as Dictator, acting
in your own interests quite as much as in that of the State, shall
support the right of veto and protect by my authority the safeguard
which you are destroying. If, therefore, C. Licinius and L. Sextius
give way before the opposition of their colleagues, I will not intrude
the powers of a patrician magistrate into the councils of the plebs;
if, however, in spite of that opposition they are bent on imposing
their measures on the State, as though it had been subjugated in war,
I will not allow the tribunitian power to work its own destruction."

The tribunes of the plebs treated this pronouncement with contempt,
and persisted in their course with unshaken resolution. Thereupon
Camillus, excessively angry, sent lictors to disperse the plebeians
and threatened, if they went on, to bind the fighting men by their
military oath and march them out of the City. The plebs were greatly
alarmed, but their leaders were exasperated rather than intimidated by
his opposition. But while the contest was still undecided he resigned
office, either owing to some irregularity in his nomination, as
certain writers maintain, or because the tribunes proposed a
resolution, which the plebs adopted, to the effect that if Camillus
took any action as Dictator a fine of 500,000 ases should be imposed
upon him. That his resignation was due to some defect in the auspices
rather than to the effect of such an unprecedented proposal I am led
to believe by the following considerations: the well-known character
of the man himself; the fact that P. Manlius immediately succeeded him
as Dictator - for what influence could he have exerted in a contest in
which Camillus had been worsted? the further fact that Camillus was
again Dictator the following year, for surely he would have been
ashamed to reassume an authority which had been successfully defied
the year before. Besides, at the time when, according to the
tradition, the resolution imposing a fine on him was passed, either he
had as Dictator the power to negative a measure which he saw was meant
to circumscribe his authority, or else he was powerless to resist even
those other measures on account of which this one was carried. But
amidst all the conflicts in which tribunes and consuls have been
engaged, the Dictator's powers have always been above controversy." -
Livy, History of Rome 6.38


"From that time onward, apparently, the dates of the festivals were by
the new calendar, and so ceased to rotate throughout the length of the
solar year. At all events Plutarch, writing about the end of the first
century, implies that they were then fixed, not movable; for though he
does not mention the Alexandrian calendar, he clearly dates his
festivals by it. Moreover, the long festal calendar at Esne, an
important document of the Imperial age, is obviously based on the
fixed Alexandrian year; for it assigns the mark for New Year's
Day to the day which corresponds to the twenty-ninth of August, which
was the first day of the Alexandrian year, and its references to the
rising of the Nile, the position of the sun, and the operations of
agriculture are all in harmony with this supposition. Thus we may take
it as fairly certain that from 30 (before this era) onwards the
Egyptian festivals were stationary in the solar year." - Sir James
George Frazer (1854 - 1941), The Golden Bough, 1922 [note: scholarship
has concluded that Frazer was off by about 4 years]

Today is New Year's Day in the Alexandrian Calendar, which was used in
Egypt from 26/26 B.C. onwards; it survives in the Coptic and Ethiopian
Orthodox Churches:

"The Egyptian calendar was simple, but it is neither a lunar nor a
solar calendar. Months do not correspond to lunar months, and years do
not correspond to solar years. The Egyptians were aware of this, and
calculated their seasonal year by the stars, to be the time between
successive heliacal risings of the star Sirius (which the Egyptians
called Sothis). The heliacal rising of Sothis returned to the same
point in the calendar every 1460 years (a period called the Sothic
cycle). The difference between a seasonal year and a civil year was
therefore 365 days in 1460 years, or 1 day in 4 years. In 238 B.C.,
the Ptolemaic rulers decreed that every 4th year should be 366 days
long rather than 365. That practice was not followed, however, until
the introduction of the "Alexandrian calendar" in 25 B.C. Calendars in
use today (the Coptic calendar and the Ethiopian calendar) are
similar, as was the French Revolutionary calendar." - Wikipedia


In ancient Egypt today was also celebrated as the Nativity of Hathor,
the feminine goddess par excellence in ancient Egypt. Hathor was a
pre-Dynastic goddess who gained enormous popularity early on. Her name
is translated as "the House of Horus", which may be a reference to her
as the embodiment of the sky in her role of the Celestial Cow, being
that which surrounds the decidedly sky-oriented hawk-deity, Horus,
when he takes wing. If Horus was the god associated with the living
king, Hathor was the god associated with the living queen. In earlier
periods she was most often depicted as a full cow with the sundisk
between her horns or as a slender woman wearing the
horns-and-a-sundisk headdress (which may or may not have a uraeus upon
it). She was also shown as a hippopotamus, a falcon, a cobra, or a
lioness, however these were not as frequent as the woman or the cow.
While there are some depictions of Hathor as a woman with a cow's
head, this is mainly found only in the later periods.

Hathor's symbology included such items as sistra (a type of rattle),
the horns-and-sundisk headdress (in much later times incorporated into
the attire of Isis), the menat (a type of ritual necklace that may
have been used for percussive music), and mirrors. Many ancient
mirrors and sistra decorated with smiling, often nude Hathors on them
have been uncovered over the years, and Hathor's visage (with cow
ears) commonly appeared at the top of stone columns in Egyptian
temples, many of which can still be seen today. Her cult flourished in
Ta-Netjer ("Land of God" -- modern day Dendera) in Upper Egypt and her
priests included both men and women, many of whom were dancers,
singers, or musicians as the arts fell under Hathor's domain. Priests
of Hathor were also oracles and midwives, and people could go to some
temples of Hathor to have their dreams interpreted by her priests.
Hathor's protection was invoked over children and pregnant women.

Hathor, as the Eye of Ra, "becomes" Sakhmet in the story "The
Destruction of Mankind". Engraved into one of the shrines of
Tutankhamen's tomb, the story tells how Hathor, at the request of her
father (Ra), turns into Sakhmet in order to punish humans for
transgressing against him. When she nearly wipes out all of humanity,
Ra tries to stop her and, failing in that, contrives to get her drunk,
whereupon she immediately forgets what it was she was doing and goes
back to being Hathor. Hathor also appears as a minor character in "The
Contendings of Horus and Seth". Her father (Ra) falls into a black
mood so Hathor sets forth to cheer him up. Removing her clothing, she
dances around his throne until he smiles again.

An additional myth, sometimes called "The Distant Goddess", tells of
how Hathor became angry with Ra and wandered away from Egypt. Great
sadness falls over the land and Ra, lost without his Eye, decides to
fetch her back. However, Hathor has now become a deadly wild cat who
destroys all that approaches her, and so no man or god will volunteer
to go get her. Thoth eventually agrees to lure her back and, dressed
in disguise, manages to coax the angry goddess to return to Egypt by
telling her stories. Back in her homeland, she bathes in the Nile and
once again settles into her normally gentle demeanor, but not before
the waters turn red from the effort of cooling her rage. In some
versions of this story it is Tefnut, not Hathor, who wanders away from
Egypt, and Shu, not Thoth, who brings her back.

Hathor is associated with numerous other Egyptian goddesses. Her
connections with Bastet helped to "soften up" that deity's visage, and
as discussed previously Hathor was the other side of the Sakhmet coin.
Hathor also seems to have absorbed many of the properties of Bat
(another pre-Dynastic cow goddess), who is depicted at the top of the
famous Narmer palette overseeing the events detailed therein.

Hathor is also known as the "Lady to the Limit" ("limit" meaning the
edges of the known universe) and the "Lady of the West"; her image is
sometimes seen on funerary depiction as she stands behind Osiris,
welcoming the dead to their new home. Other titles of Hathor include
the "Divine (or Celestial) Cow", "Mistress of Heaven", and "Lady of
Gold", the last two of which were sometimes attributed to the queens
of ancient Egypt. Hathor was also known as the "Lady of Greenstone and
Malachite" due to her being regarded as a goddess of the desert
fringes where such mines existed.

The Greeks called Hathor by the name of their goddess, Aphrodite. In
the very late stages of Egyptian religion (over two millennia after
Hathor had first appeared) she became almost totally absorbed into
Isis (who acquired, aside from Hathor's headdress, the sistrum as
well), resulting in frequent mistaken identity between the two. There
are, however, subtle differences. When Isis is shown with the horns
she is also (usually) shown with either the vulture headdress (which
was associated with Mut, a goddess of Thebes), winged, or wearing a
multi-colored feathered dress. There are of course exceptions (such as
in the tomb of Horemheb), in which case knowledge of hieroglyphs is
necessary to discern which goddess is which.

At the temple of Nefertari at Abu Simbel, Nefertari is shown as Hathor
in many places, and Ramses II (the husband of Nefertari) is shown in
one sanctuary receiving milk from Hathor the cow. When a child was
born in Egypt, seven Hathors (somewhat like European fairy godmothers)
would appear to "speak with one mouth" and determine the child's fate.
Hathor's own child was Ihy, who was worshipped in Dendera with her and
Horus-Behdety. Like his mother, Ihy was a god of music and dancing,
and was always depicted as a child bearing a sistrum.


Today is also the Feast of The Decolletation of The Foreunner, also
known as the Beheading of John the Baptist. John the Baptist (also
called John the Baptizer) is regarded as a prophet by at least three
religions: Christianity, Islam, and Mandaeanism. According to the
Gospel of Luke, he was a relative of Jesus. That he was a prophet is
asserted by the Synoptic Gospels of the Christian Bible and the Qur'an
(see also prophets of Islam). Eastern Orthodox Christians also refer
to him as John the Forerunner because he was the forerunner of Christ.
Isaiah 40:3-5 is commonly read as a prophecy of John. Muslims believe
the head of John the Baptist is interred in the Umayyad Mosque.

"Now some of the Jews thought that the destruction of Herod's army
came from God, and that very justly, as a punishment of what he did
against John, that was called the Baptist: for Herod slew him, who was
a good man, and commanded the Jews to exercise virtue, both as to
righteousness towards one another, and piety towards God, and so to
come to baptism; for that the washing [with water] would be acceptable
to him, if they made use of it, not in order to the putting away [or
the remission] of some sins [only], but for the purification of the
body; supposing still that the soul was thoroughly purified beforehand
by righteousness. Now when [many] others came in crowds about him, for
they were very greatly moved [or pleased] by hearing his words, Herod,
who feared lest the great influence John had over the people might put
it into his power and inclination to raise a rebellion, (for they
seemed ready to do any thing he should advise,) thought it best, by
putting him to death, to prevent any mischief he might cause, and not
bring himself into difficulties, by sparing a man who might make him
repent of it when it would be too late. Accordingly he was sent a
prisoner, out of Herod's suspicious temper, to Macherus, the castle I
before mentioned, and was there put to death. Now the Jews had an
opinion that the destruction of this army was sent as a punishment
upon Herod, and a mark of God's displeasure to him." - Flavius
Josephus, Jewish Antiquities 18.5, paragraph 2

"On hearing the ruler's plan, John pronounced that such a marriage
would be incestuous. He would not approve it under any circumstance,
as it was against the Law of the Torah. John's pronouncement spread
like wildfire. Salome was angry, for it was her ambition to rule the
kingdom with her uncle. She plotted to achieve her aim. Dressing
attractively, she sang and danced before her uncle. Arousing his lust,
Herod embraced her, he offered to fulfill whatever she desired. At
once she told him: "I would love to have the head of John, because he
has defiled your honor and mine throughout the land. If you grant me
this wish, I shall be very happy and will offer myself to you."
Bewitched by her charm, he submitted to her monstrous request. John
was executed and his head was brought to Salome. The cruel woman
gloated with delight. But the death of Allah's beloved prophet was
avenged. Not only she, but all the children of Israel were severely
punished by invading armies which destroyed their kingdom." - Ibn
Kathir, Stories of The Prophets (Muslim)

The fame of John reached the ears of Jesus in Nazareth (Matthew 3:5),
and He came from Galilee to Jordan to be baptized by John, on the
special ground that it became him to "fulfill all righteousness"
(3:15). John's special office ceased with the Baptism of Jesus, who
must now "increase" as the King come to His kingdom. He continued,
however, for a while to bear testimony to the Messiahship of Jesus. He
pointed Jesus out to his disciples, saying, "Behold the Lamb of God."
His public ministry was suddenly (after about six months probably)
brought to a close by his being cast into prison by Herod, whom he had
reproved for the sin of having taken to himself the wife of his
brother Philip (Luke 3:19). He was shut up in the castle of Machaerus,
a fortress on the southern extremity of Peraea, 9 miles east of the
Dead Sea, and here he was beheaded at the instigation of Herodias;
later tradition also implicates Salome. His disciples, having
consigned the headless body to the grave, went and told Jesus all that
had occurred (Matthew 14:3-12). John's death occurred apparently just
before the third Passover of Jesus' ministry. Jesus Himself testified
regarding John that he was a "burning and a shining light" (John
5:35). The Eastern Orthodox believe that John was the last of the Old
Testament prophets, thus serving as a bridge figure between that
period of revelation and Jesus. They also embrace a tradition that,
following his death, John descended into Hell and there once more
preached that Jesus the Messiah was coming.



Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy (http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/Livy/), "The Golden Bough"
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Golden_Bough), Wikipedia
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page), Encyclopedia Mythica
("Hathor." Encyclopedia Mythica. 2005. Encyclopedia Mythica Online.
29 Aug. 2005 <http://www.pantheon.org/articles/h/hathor.html>.),
Josephus "Jewish Antiquities"
(http://earlychristianwritings.com/text/josephus/ant-18.htm),
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37421 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Rome Mini-series
Salvete Quinte Servili,

I wacthed her last night since I have sat tv at work but will miss
some of it when I return home because I don't subscribe to the movie
channels.

It was interesting but the frontal nudity and sex scenes rule it out
for younger audiences who may be intersted in Rome. My main question
is trhe part where a centurion, while inflicting punishment on a
soldier by flogging is also threatening his legion with cruxifiction.

Historically:

1) I know from the military list that a soldier could be put to
death under certain circumstances but I thought whipping and
cruxcifiction were forbidden for Roman citizens. I am still waiting
to find out if this is so.


2) I know Julius Caesar was once captured by pirates but never heard
that Octavian, as a young boy was captured by barbarians.

3) I heard M.L.Crassus lost the eagle standards in Persia as did
Quintilius Veras in the Teutoburg Wald but I never heard of Caesar
losing any; especially stolen right from his camp.

On a more positive not, I really liked the sets, photography and
especially the moving graffiti on the walls at the brginning of the
movie; intersting music too!





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Charlie Collins <ks_deist@p...>
wrote:
> Salve,
>
> Well, did anyone else watch it tonight? If so what was your
opinion of it?
> Thumb's up or Thumb's down. I give it two thumb's UP. And if any
of our
> historians saw it what are your pro's and con's on it. Also, how
realistic
> was the battle scene with the legionaries rotating on the command
of the
> Centurion's whistle so there were fresh fighters in the front of
the
> formation.
>
> Vale,
>
> Quintus Sevilius Priscus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37422 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: House of Ptolemy (offshoot of From boy to tyrant...or benefacto
Ive read that book too. The night of knifes disgusted
me. If you know that you are going to be offed after a
succession why hang around or bother w promotion?
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato T. Octavioni Salvio S.P.D.
>
> Salve Salvius.
>
> I haven't yet, but I did read an odd little book by
Duncan Sprott
> entitled "the ptolemies"; it's a history of the
Ptolemies written from
> the viewpoint of the God Thoth. It's a little
bizarre, but a great read.
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Cato
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com,
"t_octavius_salvius" <fin37@h...> wrote:
>
> > Incidentally, have you come across 'A History of
the Ptolemaic
> > Empire' by Gunther Holbl? I've just picked it up
again after a year,
> > and it's a fascinating read, although it's really
very difficult to
> > keep up with the Kings, what with the very
unorigianl naming system
> > they had.
> >
> > vale
> >
> > T. Octavius Salvius
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37423 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Rome Mini-series
Geographically its the same but it was the Parthians
Crassvs fell to. They later became the Persians AGAIN
and now are the Iraqis. Spooky,huh?
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mjk@...>
wrote:
> Salvete Quinte Servili,
>
> I wacthed her last night since I have sat tv at work
but will miss
> some of it when I return home because I don't
subscribe to the movie
> channels.
>
> It was interesting but the frontal nudity and sex
scenes rule it out
> for younger audiences who may be intersted in Rome.
My main question
> is trhe part where a centurion, while inflicting
punishment on a
> soldier by flogging is also threatening his legion
with cruxifiction.
>
> Historically:
>
> 1) I know from the military list that a soldier
could be put to
> death under certain circumstances but I thought
whipping and
> cruxcifiction were forbidden for Roman citizens. I
am still waiting
> to find out if this is so.
>
>
> 2) I know Julius Caesar was once captured by pirates
but never heard
> that Octavian, as a young boy was captured by
barbarians.
>
> 3) I heard M.L.Crassus lost the eagle standards in
Persia as did
> Quintilius Veras in the Teutoburg Wald but I never
heard of Caesar
> losing any; especially stolen right from his camp.
>
> On a more positive not, I really liked the sets,
photography and
> especially the moving graffiti on the walls at the
brginning of the
> movie; intersting music too!
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Charlie Collins
<ks_deist@p...>
> wrote:
> > Salve,
> >
> > Well, did anyone else watch it tonight? If so what
was your
> opinion of it?
> > Thumb's up or Thumb's down. I give it two thumb's
UP. And if any
> of our
> > historians saw it what are your pro's and con's on
it. Also, how
> realistic
> > was the battle scene with the legionaries rotating
on the command
> of the
> > Centurion's whistle so there were fresh fighters
in the front of
> the
> > formation.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Quintus Sevilius Priscus
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37424 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
--- praefectus2324@...
<praefectus2324@...> wrote:
> Another factoid that is relatively unknown & goes
> unmentioned in the dont offend anyone USA. The folks
> in Alexandria thumbed thier noses at native Kemeti.
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mfalco1@...>
> wrote:
> > Salvete Omnes,
> >
> > I have to add that Cleopatra was not only
descended
> from the European
> > Ptolemy Line, but also was a granddaughter of
> Mithridates the Great
> > of Pontus. Half her blood line was semetic and it
> shows in her busts
> > with her strong jawline and huge nose. She may not
> have been dark as
> > in being "African" looking but she must have been
> darker than the
> > average European. Let's also not forget, that the
> Alexandrians and
> > the native Egyptians were two different peoples.
> >
> > Pax
> > Falco
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
> > <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> > > I agree with you. I know she Was a blonde. But
> most
> > > Americans if they were asked would say that
> Hannibal &
> > > Cleopatra are black.They wont accept otherwise.
> > > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > <iulius_sabinus@y...> wrote:
> > > > SALVE !
> > > >
> > > > I'm not agree with this ideea. She was not
dark.
> > > Don't forget her
> > > > genealogy. Her ancestors was from Macedonia.
> > > Ptolomeu I Soter was
> > > > general in the Alexander army. Cleopatra was
the
> 7th
> > > Cleopatra from
> > > > the dinasty . Anyway the egiptians aren't
dark.
> > > >
> > > > VALE,
> > > > IVL SABINVS
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond
> fuentes
> > > > <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> > > > > Thats from the modern and I dare say
> politically
> > > > > correct stance that she is from Africa so
she
> MUST
> > > BE
> > > > > dark. Very few folks even heard or know of
the
> > > > > Ptolomies
> > > > > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<mlcinnyc@y...>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > G. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Salvete omnes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Paulinus brought up a question in my mind,
> and
> > > here
> > > > > are the results:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Greek.htm
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Egyptian.htm
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> http://sangha.net/messengers/cleopatra/Coins.htm
> > > > > >
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37425 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
SALVE SEXTE PILATE !

A good question indeed. Maybe the answer is a part of the eternal
feminine mistery. But because I'm intrigued about that, I will try
to find some references.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Bird" <p.bird@n...> wrote:
> Salvete omnes!
>
> Now this is a question that has intrigued me for years: what on
earth was it
> about Cleopatra that made her so desirable, so much so that Mark
Antony
> could not be drawn away from her? I've seen pictures of her - not
just the
> coin ones, but the famous bust - and in no way would one call her
either
> beautiful or attractive; yet Caesar and Antony couldn't resist her.
>
> Sextus Pilatus Barbatus
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf
> Of raymond fuentes
> Sent: 28 August 2005 19:50
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: From boy to tyrant...or
benefactor?
>
>
>
> As far as Cleopara VII is concerned as we have had
> this discussion in the past,an intellectual she was-
> albeit lingua latina, a raving beauty she was not.
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <metelliana@y...>
> wrote:
> > Salvete,
> >
> > I have a question. How much contact did Octavius
> have with his uncle befor
> > e Caesars death?
> >
> > Valete,
> > Metelliana
> >
> > "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)"
> <mjk@d...> wrote:
> > Salvete!
> >
> > This is a great topic for conversation. I have heard
> different views
> > about Augustus over the years both good and bad but
> overall I have
> > come to the conclusion that he was a shrewd
> politician who was able
> > to outwit the more military minded generals. The
> fall of the
> > republic was a forgone conclusion set in motion
> before his time.
> >
> > When I think of Rome's golden age I think of
> Augustus; under his
> > administration Rome and her empire were really set
> on its feet with
> > Pax Romana. In comparison to other men and emperors
> of his time I
> > thought he did vey well. He seemed to be more Stoic
> in the way he
> > lived avoiding lavish lifestyles, trying to set some
> sorts of moral
> > codes. Even Cleopatra who knocked two tough generals
> off their feet
> > was unable to drag the younger Augustus to the sack;
> if she was the
> > great intellectual enchantress and beauty by the
> standards of those
> > times, she never phased the stronger character of
> Augustus which
> > showed that his privates did not rule his brain.
> >
> > You can find fault with every human in the world;
> even Mother Teresa
> > and many writers have mentioned his short comings
> and weaknesses..
> > Overall however you did not get to such a position
> and let alone
> > hold it for such a long time by being weak in
> character and stupid
> > intellectually; in short, my hat goes off to
> Augustus. I think his
> > benevolence and service to Rome far exceeds his
> house cleaning
> > earlier on.
> >
> > Now these are just my personal thoughts and do not
> mean this to be
> > an academic exercise so I haven't hit the books for
> quotes,
> > critiques etc.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > Quintus Lanius Paulinus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com,
> laurent_coffre@b... wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Salvete,
> > >
> > > In an effort to keep political and other boring
> stuff at bay, I
> > copy below
> > > something I sent to the Britannia list some time
> ago when we were
> > > discussing the role Octavianus played in the fall
> of the republic.
> > The
> > > question, of course, has not been settled so I
> thought I could
> > poke around
> > > and see if some of you would like to comment and
> offer suggestions
> > or more
> > > evidence on what I have written ;-)
> > > I would be happy to provide my sources if anybody
> is interested...
> > >
> > > So here it goes below,
> > >
> > > Valete
> > >
> > > Laureatus
> > >
> > > xxxxxx
> > >
> > > Thank you both for taking interest in the
> discussion. I would
> > like, if I
> > > may, express a couple of things that prompted me
> to write on this
> > list
> > > about Octavius/Octavianus/Caesar/Augustus.
> === Message Truncated ===
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> _____
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>
> * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.
>
>
>
> _____
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37426 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: House of Ptolemy (offshoot of 'From boy to tyrant...or benefact
T. Octavius Salvius G. Equitio Catoni S.P.D.

Salve Amice,

> I haven't yet, but I did read an odd little book by Duncan Sprott
> entitled "the ptolemies"; it's a history of the Ptolemies written
from
> the viewpoint of the God Thoth. It's a little bizarre, but a
great read.


I'll have a look out for that! I think I'm catching Ptolemy-fever
(not to be confused with Malaria).

It always seemed to me that the Ptolemies were the most sucessful of
the Diadochi. What happened to the other sucessor kingdoms, like the
Selucids and Macedon itself (presumably Rome happened to them)?

vale

T. Octavius Salvius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37427 From: M. Fatih Algan Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Salve Omnes

Most importanted thing about Cleopatra was not her attractive beautiy. Her
beautiy as well as ordinary woman. But she was intellgent and entellectual
woman. All of the ancient writer sad that; most attractive point of her whic
was her style.

Vale Bene
Mantis Draconarius Achileus

----- Original Message -----
From: "Titus Iulius Sabinus" <iulius_sabinus@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 4:30 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?


> SALVE SEXTE PILATE !
>
> A good question indeed. Maybe the answer is a part of the eternal
> feminine mistery. But because I'm intrigued about that, I will try
> to find some references.
>
> VALE BENE,
> IVL SABINVS
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Bird" <p.bird@n...> wrote:
>> Salvete omnes!
>>
>> Now this is a question that has intrigued me for years: what on
> earth was it
>> about Cleopatra that made her so desirable, so much so that Mark
> Antony
>> could not be drawn away from her? I've seen pictures of her - not
> just the
>> coin ones, but the famous bust - and in no way would one call her
> either
>> beautiful or attractive; yet Caesar and Antony couldn't resist her.
>>
>> Sextus Pilatus Barbatus
>>
>>
>>
>> _____
>>
>> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com]
> On Behalf
>> Of raymond fuentes
>> Sent: 28 August 2005 19:50
>> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: Re: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: From boy to tyrant...or
> benefactor?
>>
>>
>>
>> As far as Cleopara VII is concerned as we have had
>> this discussion in the past,an intellectual she was-
>> albeit lingua latina, a raving beauty she was not.
>> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <metelliana@y...>
>> wrote:
>> > Salvete,
>> >
>> > I have a question. How much contact did Octavius
>> have with his uncle befor
>> > e Caesars death?
>> >
>> > Valete,
>> > Metelliana
>> >
>> > "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)"
>> <mjk@d...> wrote:
>> > Salvete!
>> >
>> > This is a great topic for conversation. I have heard
>> different views
>> > about Augustus over the years both good and bad but
>> overall I have
>> > come to the conclusion that he was a shrewd
>> politician who was able
>> > to outwit the more military minded generals. The
>> fall of the
>> > republic was a forgone conclusion set in motion
>> before his time.
>> >
>> > When I think of Rome's golden age I think of
>> Augustus; under his
>> > administration Rome and her empire were really set
>> on its feet with
>> > Pax Romana. In comparison to other men and emperors
>> of his time I
>> > thought he did vey well. He seemed to be more Stoic
>> in the way he
>> > lived avoiding lavish lifestyles, trying to set some
>> sorts of moral
>> > codes. Even Cleopatra who knocked two tough generals
>> off their feet
>> > was unable to drag the younger Augustus to the sack;
>> if she was the
>> > great intellectual enchantress and beauty by the
>> standards of those
>> > times, she never phased the stronger character of
>> Augustus which
>> > showed that his privates did not rule his brain.
>> >
>> > You can find fault with every human in the world;
>> even Mother Teresa
>> > and many writers have mentioned his short comings
>> and weaknesses..
>> > Overall however you did not get to such a position
>> and let alone
>> > hold it for such a long time by being weak in
>> character and stupid
>> > intellectually; in short, my hat goes off to
>> Augustus. I think his
>> > benevolence and service to Rome far exceeds his
>> house cleaning
>> > earlier on.
>> >
>> > Now these are just my personal thoughts and do not
>> mean this to be
>> > an academic exercise so I haven't hit the books for
>> quotes,
>> > critiques etc.
>> >
>> > Regards.
>> >
>> > Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com,
>> laurent_coffre@b... wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Salvete,
>> > >
>> > > In an effort to keep political and other boring
>> stuff at bay, I
>> > copy below
>> > > something I sent to the Britannia list some time
>> ago when we were
>> > > discussing the role Octavianus played in the fall
>> of the republic.
>> > The
>> > > question, of course, has not been settled so I
>> thought I could
>> > poke around
>> > > and see if some of you would like to comment and
>> offer suggestions
>> > or more
>> > > evidence on what I have written ;-)
>> > > I would be happy to provide my sources if anybody
>> is interested...
>> > >
>> > > So here it goes below,
>> > >
>> > > Valete
>> > >
>> > > Laureatus
>> > >
>> > > xxxxxx
>> > >
>> > > Thank you both for taking interest in the
>> discussion. I would
>> > like, if I
>> > > may, express a couple of things that prompted me
>> to write on this
>> > list
>> > > about Octavius/Octavianus/Caesar/Augustus.
>> === Message Truncated ===
>>
>>
>> S P Q R
>>
>> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>>
>> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
>> Roman Citizen
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _____
>>
>> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>>
>>
>>
>> * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
>> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.
>>
>> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>>
>> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
>> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.
>>
>>
>>
>> _____
>>
>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37428 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
SALVE !

I'm agree. But I want to look deeper. We already have excluded the part with her attractivity. Let's try to find another different reasons. Your answer is very good. But I need some historical references.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

"M. Fatih Algan" <mfatih_algan@...> wrote:
Salve Omnes

Most importanted thing about Cleopatra was not her attractive beautiy. Her
beautiy as well as ordinary woman. But she was intellgent and entellectual
woman. All of the ancient writer sad that; most attractive point of her whic
was her style.

Vale Bene
Mantis Draconarius Achileus

----- Original Message -----
From: "Titus Iulius Sabinus" <iulius_sabinus@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 4:30 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?


> SALVE SEXTE PILATE !
>
> A good question indeed. Maybe the answer is a part of the eternal
> feminine mistery. But because I'm intrigued about that, I will try
> to find some references.
>
> VALE BENE,
> IVL SABINVS
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Bird" <p.bird@n...> wrote:
>> Salvete omnes!
>>
>> Now this is a question that has intrigued me for years: what on
> earth was it
>> about Cleopatra that made her so desirable, so much so that Mark
> Antony
>> could not be drawn away from her? I've seen pictures of her - not
> just the
>> coin ones, but the famous bust - and in no way would one call her
> either
>> beautiful or attractive; yet Caesar and Antony couldn't resist her.
>>
>> Sextus Pilatus Barbatus
>>
>>
>>
>> _____
>>
>> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com]
> On Behalf
>> Of raymond fuentes
>> Sent: 28 August 2005 19:50
>> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: Re: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: From boy to tyrant...or
> benefactor?
>>
>>
>>
>> As far as Cleopara VII is concerned as we have had
>> this discussion in the past,an intellectual she was-
>> albeit lingua latina, a raving beauty she was not.
>> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <metelliana@y...>
>> wrote:
>> > Salvete,
>> >
>> > I have a question. How much contact did Octavius
>> have with his uncle befor
>> > e Caesars death?
>> >
>> > Valete,
>> > Metelliana
>> >
>> > "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)"
>> <mjk@d...> wrote:
>> > Salvete!
>> >
>> > This is a great topic for conversation. I have heard
>> different views
>> > about Augustus over the years both good and bad but
>> overall I have
>> > come to the conclusion that he was a shrewd
>> politician who was able
>> > to outwit the more military minded generals. The
>> fall of the
>> > republic was a forgone conclusion set in motion
>> before his time.
>> >
>> > When I think of Rome's golden age I think of
>> Augustus; under his
>> > administration Rome and her empire were really set
>> on its feet with
>> > Pax Romana. In comparison to other men and emperors
>> of his time I
>> > thought he did vey well. He seemed to be more Stoic
>> in the way he
>> > lived avoiding lavish lifestyles, trying to set some
>> sorts of moral
>> > codes. Even Cleopatra who knocked two tough generals
>> off their feet
>> > was unable to drag the younger Augustus to the sack;
>> if she was the
>> > great intellectual enchantress and beauty by the
>> standards of those
>> > times, she never phased the stronger character of
>> Augustus which
>> > showed that his privates did not rule his brain.
>> >
>> > You can find fault with every human in the world;
>> even Mother Teresa
>> > and many writers have mentioned his short comings
>> and weaknesses..
>> > Overall however you did not get to such a position
>> and let alone
>> > hold it for such a long time by being weak in
>> character and stupid
>> > intellectually; in short, my hat goes off to
>> Augustus. I think his
>> > benevolence and service to Rome far exceeds his
>> house cleaning
>> > earlier on.
>> >
>> > Now these are just my personal thoughts and do not
>> mean this to be
>> > an academic exercise so I haven't hit the books for
>> quotes,
>> > critiques etc.
>> >
>> > Regards.
>> >
>> > Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com,
>> laurent_coffre@b... wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Salvete,
>> > >
>> > > In an effort to keep political and other boring
>> stuff at bay, I
>> > copy below
>> > > something I sent to the Britannia list some time
>> ago when we were
>> > > discussing the role Octavianus played in the fall
>> of the republic.
>> > The
>> > > question, of course, has not been settled so I
>> thought I could
>> > poke around
>> > > and see if some of you would like to comment and
>> offer suggestions
>> > or more
>> > > evidence on what I have written ;-)
>> > > I would be happy to provide my sources if anybody
>> is interested...
>> > >
>> > > So here it goes below,
>> > >
>> > > Valete
>> > >
>> > > Laureatus
>> > >
>> > > xxxxxx
>> > >
>> > > Thank you both for taking interest in the
>> discussion. I would
>> > like, if I
>> > > may, express a couple of things that prompted me
>> to write on this
>> > list
>> > > about Octavius/Octavianus/Caesar/Augustus.
>> === Message Truncated ===
>>
>>
>> S P Q R
>>
>> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>>
>> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
>> Roman Citizen
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _____
>>
>> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>>
>>
>>
>> * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
>> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.
>>
>> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>>
>> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
>> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.
>>
>>
>>
>> _____
>>
>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com




---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------






"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37429 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Thanks!



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Titus Iulius Sabinus
Sent: 29 August 2005 14:30
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?



SALVE SEXTE PILATE !

A good question indeed. Maybe the answer is a part of the eternal
feminine mistery. But because I'm intrigued about that, I will try
to find some references.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Bird" <p.bird@n...> wrote:
> Salvete omnes!
>
> Now this is a question that has intrigued me for years: what on
earth was it
> about Cleopatra that made her so desirable, so much so that Mark
Antony
> could not be drawn away from her? I've seen pictures of her - not
just the
> coin ones, but the famous bust - and in no way would one call her
either
> beautiful or attractive; yet Caesar and Antony couldn't resist her.
>
> Sextus Pilatus Barbatus
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf
> Of raymond fuentes
> Sent: 28 August 2005 19:50
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: From boy to tyrant...or
benefactor?
>
>
>
> As far as Cleopara VII is concerned as we have had
> this discussion in the past,an intellectual she was-
> albeit lingua latina, a raving beauty she was not.
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <metelliana@y...>
> wrote:
> > Salvete,
> >
> > I have a question. How much contact did Octavius
> have with his uncle befor
> > e Caesars death?
> >
> > Valete,
> > Metelliana
> >
> > "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)"
> <mjk@d...> wrote:
> > Salvete!
> >
> > This is a great topic for conversation. I have heard
> different views
> > about Augustus over the years both good and bad but
> overall I have
> > come to the conclusion that he was a shrewd
> politician who was able
> > to outwit the more military minded generals. The
> fall of the
> > republic was a forgone conclusion set in motion
> before his time.
> >
> > When I think of Rome's golden age I think of
> Augustus; under his
> > administration Rome and her empire were really set
> on its feet with
> > Pax Romana. In comparison to other men and emperors
> of his time I
> > thought he did vey well. He seemed to be more Stoic
> in the way he
> > lived avoiding lavish lifestyles, trying to set some
> sorts of moral
> > codes. Even Cleopatra who knocked two tough generals
> off their feet
> > was unable to drag the younger Augustus to the sack;
> if she was the
> > great intellectual enchantress and beauty by the
> standards of those
> > times, she never phased the stronger character of
> Augustus which
> > showed that his privates did not rule his brain.
> >
> > You can find fault with every human in the world;
> even Mother Teresa
> > and many writers have mentioned his short comings
> and weaknesses..
> > Overall however you did not get to such a position
> and let alone
> > hold it for such a long time by being weak in
> character and stupid
> > intellectually; in short, my hat goes off to
> Augustus. I think his
> > benevolence and service to Rome far exceeds his
> house cleaning
> > earlier on.
> >
> > Now these are just my personal thoughts and do not
> mean this to be
> > an academic exercise so I haven't hit the books for
> quotes,
> > critiques etc.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > Quintus Lanius Paulinus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com,
> laurent_coffre@b... wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Salvete,
> > >
> > > In an effort to keep political and other boring
> stuff at bay, I
> > copy below
> > > something I sent to the Britannia list some time
> ago when we were
> > > discussing the role Octavianus played in the fall
> of the republic.
> > The
> > > question, of course, has not been settled so I
> thought I could
> > poke around
> > > and see if some of you would like to comment and
> offer suggestions
> > or more
> > > evidence on what I have written ;-)
> > > I would be happy to provide my sources if anybody
> is interested...
> > >
> > > So here it goes below,
> > >
> > > Valete
> > >
> > > Laureatus
> > >
> > > xxxxxx
> > >
> > > Thank you both for taking interest in the
> discussion. I would
> > like, if I
> > > may, express a couple of things that prompted me
> to write on this
> > list
> > > about Octavius/Octavianus/Caesar/Augustus.
> === Message Truncated ===
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> _____
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>
> * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.
>
>
>
> _____
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37430 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
G. Iulius Scaurus S. Pilato Barbato S.P.D.

Salve, Barbate.

> Now this is a question that has intrigued me for years: what on earth was it
> about Cleopatra that made her so desirable, so much so that Mark Antony
> could not be drawn away from her? I've seen pictures of her - not just the
> coin ones, but the famous bust - and in no way would one call her either
> beautiful or attractive; yet Caesar and Antony couldn't resist her.

Egypt was the largest producer of grain exported to Rome; it also had
the largest collection of refined precious metals in the
Mediterranean. Someone who wanted to be dictator for life in Rome
(Caesar) or to rule the East (which was almost certainly Antonius'
real objective) would have been a fool not to court her. Neither
Caesar nor Antonius could hold the Nile and its riches (most of the
precious metals were in temples along the river, not in Alexandra)
without her. By the time Augustus reached Alexandria he had enough
troops in tow to enforce his will without Cleopatra (unlike Caesar and
Antonius, Augustus never had the slightest illusion that he was a
military genius -- he and Agrippa made damned certain they had troops
for the task at hand in plenitude to finish it by brute force), and
was able to play to an increasingly disaffected ethnically Egyptian
priesthood which largely controlled the cities of the Nile.

Vale.

Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37431 From: Barry Smith Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Rome Mini-series
Salve,

I saw it and really enjoyed it. It was a much grittier portrayal of Rome
than we normally get to see. I look forward to the next episode.

Vale,

Caius Titinius Varus
Slightly battered and wet in southern Louisiana.





>From: Charlie Collins <ks_deist@...>
>Reply-To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [Nova-Roma] Rome Mini-series
>Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:28:30 -0500
>
>Salve,
>
>Well, did anyone else watch it tonight? If so what was your opinion of it?
>Thumb's up or Thumb's down. I give it two thumb's UP. And if any of our
>historians saw it what are your pro's and con's on it. Also, how realistic
>was the battle scene with the legionaries rotating on the command of the
>Centurion's whistle so there were fresh fighters in the front of the
>formation.
>
>Vale,
>
>Quintus Sevilius Priscus
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37432 From: Stefanie Beer Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Betreff: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Multae sententiae de constitutione et
Salve Diana Octavia,

>The old NR of 1999-2001, no longer exists. Even with
the fighting that took place, at least this place had
spirit....

That is a bit harsh and depressing to read when oneself has joined Nova Roma
only recently. It didn´t feel all that spiritless to me I must say.
Vale,
Lucia Flavia Lectrix

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37433 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Thank you, G Iuli Scaure - that's certainly a new and interesting slant!

Sextus Pilatus Barbatus



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Gregory Rose
Sent: 29 August 2005 15:15
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?



G. Iulius Scaurus S. Pilato Barbato S.P.D.

Salve, Barbate.

> Now this is a question that has intrigued me for years: what on earth was
it
> about Cleopatra that made her so desirable, so much so that Mark Antony
> could not be drawn away from her? I've seen pictures of her - not just the
> coin ones, but the famous bust - and in no way would one call her either
> beautiful or attractive; yet Caesar and Antony couldn't resist her.

Egypt was the largest producer of grain exported to Rome; it also had
the largest collection of refined precious metals in the
Mediterranean. Someone who wanted to be dictator for life in Rome
(Caesar) or to rule the East (which was almost certainly Antonius'
real objective) would have been a fool not to court her. Neither
Caesar nor Antonius could hold the Nile and its riches (most of the
precious metals were in temples along the river, not in Alexandra)
without her. By the time Augustus reached Alexandria he had enough
troops in tow to enforce his will without Cleopatra (unlike Caesar and
Antonius, Augustus never had the slightest illusion that he was a
military genius -- he and Agrippa made damned certain they had troops
for the task at hand in plenitude to finish it by brute force), and
was able to play to an increasingly disaffected ethnically Egyptian
priesthood which largely controlled the cities of the Nile.

Vale.

Scaurus



_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37434 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Parthia and Sassanid Persia
In a message dated 8/29/2005 6:08:06 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
praefectus2324@... writes:
Geographically its the same but it was the Parthians
Crassvs fell to. They later became the Persians AGAIN
and now are the Iraqis. Spooky,huh?
Gods, man we are over simplfying.

The Persians of Kyrush were conquered by Alexandros III in 333 BCE, after his
death (323) the Hellenzation of Asia was completed by his Successors:
Ptolmeios, Selekios, Lysimachios, Peridikkas, and Antigonos (one eye). True
Achaemenid Persia went to Selekios. King Antiochios III of the Seleukid Empire
attempted to restore Alexandros III Persian conquests as far a Baktrios, which he
did by (220), but weakened all the kingdoms that he re-conquered, so much so,
that the Parthians (Aparni) who were a Steppe people
migrating from Hsiung_nu pressure in the Tarim Basin, entered Bacteria circa
273, and after
Antiochios III re-conquest campaign moved into the weakened areas of the
Mesopotamia region. Arpani legends have their "King" (Kahn) Arsaces moving into
the Seleukid province or satrapy of Parthia (238). War with King Ptolmeios V
of Egypt occupied the attention
of Antiochos III, and he ignored the East. After a disasterious campaign in
Greece where he
ran afoul of Rome, he was ejected and sent east. By 197 he assembled his
large army
at Magnesia, where a normal Consul army of four legiones and allies from
Pergamon
under the command of Africanus brother, Consul Cornelius Scipio, routed the
army, and much of it was destroyed. With no strong central army to stop them,
the Aparni were free to do what they wished. By 140/39 the Apron or Parthians
as they were now called defeated the Seleukid King, Demetrios II, who was
captured. The Parni king Mithradatos, adopted Persian customs, coined money and
called himself "Shah of Shahs" The Parthian kingdom now stretched from Bactria
to Babylonia. By 128 Mithradatos II had
invaded Armenia, reopened the Silk Road and opened relations with the Han
Chinese.
By 92 the Parthians had a trade agreement with L. Cornelius Sulla, and they
extinguished
what was left of the Seleukid kingdom by 70. By this time the Successor
State of Pontus
was fighting the Romans in Greece.
By 66 Parthia had replaced Seleukid kingdom as the new rulers of Persia.
While the old provinces of Bactria were gone, the Parthians controlled most of
old Persia except Asia Minor, Syria and Egypt.

Rome who saw itself as the protector of the Greeks, was now ready to clash
with Parthia over control of Armenia, Syria, Palestine, (Judea).
This war would last for on and off period for 200 years.

Sassanids. Even though Zoroastrian Religious traditions were revived by the
Arscid dynasty was never viewed as truly viewed as Persian. These successors
were like the Greeks, interlopers, and never completely accepted. Also the
Parthian Empire was consistently racked by civil disturbances as different
families vied for control. As well as the frequent wars with Rome, over Asian
territory.
Legends have it that near Persoplios in Persis that Sasan of the old
Achaemenid line, son ran afoul of the Parthian king. The Royal Army sent against him
was defeated, and the revolt spread. By 220 CE, Parthia was in a two front
war between Rome, and Sasan's youngest son Ardashir. By 226, he as the true
descendent of the Achaemenidian Persian lineage met King Aratbanus V of the
Arscid line, in battle. The Parthian King was killed,
and Ardashir was crowned. By 227, the Parthian empire was under control of
an Achaemindian family, the Sassanids. Firm government, prosperity, and
cultural standards returned to the Empire, which could be considered Persian once
more.

The fall of the Empire to the Arabs we will discuss at a later date.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37435 From: Marcus Traianus Valerius Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
Cato,

I must have missed your original post, that you were not going to talk about the aforementioned "items". Wow, come to think of it, you have been rather quite...

Pax,



gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
G. Equitius Cato L. Claudio Romulo S.P.D.

Salve Romulus!

Rome is not empty; we've all just gone to Sorrentum for the August
holidays :-)

One small thing that may have kept the Forum a little quieter than
usual (as far as I'm concerned at least) is a vow I made not to talk
about law or politics for one week. The week is almost up (it ends
Wednesday, 31 August)...

Vale bene,

Cato







SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------




Ita di deaque faxint!
Marcus Traianus Valerius

------------------------------------------------------------
Gens Traiana Home Page
www.geocities.com/genstraiana

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37436 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
SALVE MARCE TRAIANE !

Very nice to meet you here. I saw your gens website some time ago.
It's wonderful. We, the peoples from Dacia, are very interested
about all the references about Traian. Your work wasn't uselessly.
Thanks.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Marcus Traianus Valerius
<genstraiana@y...> wrote:
> Cato,
>
> I must have missed your original post, that you were not going to
talk about the aforementioned "items". Wow, come to think of it,
you have been rather quite...
>
> Pax,
>
>
>
> gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@y...> wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato L. Claudio Romulo S.P.D.
>
> Salve Romulus!
>
> Rome is not empty; we've all just gone to Sorrentum for the August
> holidays :-)
>
> One small thing that may have kept the Forum a little quieter than
> usual (as far as I'm concerned at least) is a vow I made not to
talk
> about law or politics for one week. The week is almost up (it ends
> Wednesday, 31 August)...
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The roman empire
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> Ita di deaque faxint!
> Marcus Traianus Valerius
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Gens Traiana Home Page
> www.geocities.com/genstraiana
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37437 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
SALVE ET SALVETE !

Hon. Iuli Scaure. You have perfect right. This is the best answer.
The economical, religious and political objectives, was in all the
history, the real reasons for different actions.
Sure both, Caesar and Anthony, was interested in all what you say.
But all of that it wasn't posible without the Cleopatra's abilities.
Sure she was very clever.
From Plutarch :
" It was a pleasure merely to hear the sound of her voice, with
which, like an instrument of many strings, she could pass from one
language to another; so that there were few of the barbarian nations
that she answered by an interpreter; to most of them she spoke
herself, as to the Ethiopians, Troglodytes, Hebrews, Arabians,
Syrians, Medes, Parthians, and many others, whose language she had
learnt; which was all the more surprising because most of the kings,
her predecessors, scarcely gave themselves the trouble to acquire
the Egyptian tongue, and several of them quite abandoned the
Macedonian."
Or about her flaterry :
From Plutarch :
"Were Antony serious or disposed to mirth, she had at any moment
some new delight or charm to meet his wishes; at every turn she was
upon him, and let him escape her neither by day nor by night. She
played at dice with him, drank with him, hunted with him; and when
he exercised in arms, she was there to see. At night she would go
rambling with him to disturb and torment people at their doors and
windows, dressed like a servant-woman, for Antony also went in
servant's disguise, and from these expeditions he often came home
very scurvily answered, and sometimes even beaten severely, though
most people guessed who it was. However, the Alexandrians in general
liked it all well enough, and joined good-humouredly and kindly in
his frolic and play, saying they were much obliged to Antony for
acting his tragic parts at Rome, and keeping comedy for them. It
would be trifling without end to be particular in his follies, but
his fishing must not be forgotten. He went out one day to angle with
Cleopatra, and, being so unfortunate as to catch nothing in the
presence of his mistress, he gave secret orders to the fishermen to
dive under water, and put fishes that had been already taken upon
his hooks; and these he drew so fast that the Egyptian perceived it.
But, feigning great admiration, she told everybody how dexterous
Antony was, and invited them next day to come and see him again. So,
when a number of them had come on board the fishing-boats, as soon
as he had let down his hook, one of her servants was beforehand with
his divers and fixed upon his hook a salted fish from Pontus.
Antony, feeling his line give, drew up the prey, and when, as may be
imagined, great laughter ensued, "Leave," said Cleopatra, "the
fishing-rod, general, to us poor sovereigns of Pharos and Canopus;
your game is cities, provinces, and kingdoms."
Sure Plutarch come here with a romantic interpretations of the
facts. All of that complete the Cleopatra's profile.
The question is until where she is a realy person or a myth created
by ancient writhers.

VALE ET VALETE,
IVL SABINVS


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gregory Rose <gregory.rose@g...>
wrote:
> G. Iulius Scaurus S. Pilato Barbato S.P.D.
>
> Salve, Barbate.
>
> > Now this is a question that has intrigued me for years: what on
earth was it
> > about Cleopatra that made her so desirable, so much so that Mark
Antony
> > could not be drawn away from her? I've seen pictures of her -
not just the
> > coin ones, but the famous bust - and in no way would one call
her either
> > beautiful or attractive; yet Caesar and Antony couldn't resist
her.
>
> Egypt was the largest producer of grain exported to Rome; it also
had
> the largest collection of refined precious metals in the
> Mediterranean. Someone who wanted to be dictator for life in Rome
> (Caesar) or to rule the East (which was almost certainly Antonius'
> real objective) would have been a fool not to court her. Neither
> Caesar nor Antonius could hold the Nile and its riches (most of the
> precious metals were in temples along the river, not in Alexandra)
> without her. By the time Augustus reached Alexandria he had enough
> troops in tow to enforce his will without Cleopatra (unlike Caesar
and
> Antonius, Augustus never had the slightest illusion that he was a
> military genius -- he and Agrippa made damned certain they had
troops
> for the task at hand in plenitude to finish it by brute force), and
> was able to play to an increasingly disaffected ethnically Egyptian
> priesthood which largely controlled the cities of the Nile.
>
> Vale.
>
> Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37438 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
G. Equitius Cato G. Iulio Scauro S. Pilato Barbato quiritibusque
S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Very interesting point, Scaurus, and sensible from a purely economic
point of view: EGYPT = GRAIN , and it was vital to the interests of
the growing Republic and later the Empire to keep the grain shipments
both safe and in Roman hands, as it were. I think I am correct in
remembering that Egypt was first an equestrian province and later a
province governed directly by the emperor, in order to keep it from
being used as a base from which to launch a revolt against the central
government in Rome by a member of the Senate. The Romans kept the
vast majority of the Ptolemaic system of government in place to keep
both a sense of continuity (which the Egyptians prized) and to ensure
smooth transitions from praefect to praefect. And it was a situation
in which Cleopatra too benefitted enormously: she had the power of
Rome to back her against the nobility in Egypt who favored her
brothers/husbands, the Ptolemies XIII and XIV.

My only question would be the depth to which Caesar in particular
became involved; having the child Ptolemy Caesar (Caesarion) by
Cleopatra; insulting his wife (and upsetting the whole upper class) by
keeping her in luxury just outside Rome; putting up a gold statue of
her in the temple of Venus Genetrix. To me, it smacks more of the
infatuation of an older man (Caesar was 52 or 53 at the time?) with a
woman who was not only the educated and intelligent ruler of a
strategically vital country but was actually worshipped as a Living
God in the pharaonic tradition.

Here is Plutarch:

"For her actual beauty, it is said, was not in itself so remarkable
that none could be compared with her, or that no one could see her
without being struck by it, but the contact of her presence, if you
lived with her, was irresistible; the attraction of her person,
joining with the charm of her conversation, and the character that
attended all she said or did, was something bewitching. It was a
pleasure merely to hear the sound of her voice, with which, like an
instrument of many strings, she could pass from one language to
another; so that there were few of the barbarian nations that she
answered by an interpreter; to most of them she spoke herself, as to
the Ethiopians, Troglodytes, Hebrews, Arabians, Syrians, Medes,
Parthians, and many others, whose language she had learnt; which was
all the more surprising, because most of the kings her predecessors
scarcely gave themselves the trouble to acquire the Egyptian tongue,
and several of them quite abandoned the Macedonian." - from Plutarch,
Parallel Lives, "Antony"
(http://ancienthistory.about.com/library/bl/bl_tex
t_plutarch_antony.htm)

Maybe it is simply the allure of such a fascinating person that keeps
us from looking at the purely economic and political aspects of her
story?

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37439 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
SALVE EQUITI CATO !

Hmmm..I'm not quite sure. That is happen all the time. Because
Octavius become what he become, sure a lot of peoples will try to
demonstrate that he was esspecially from when he was born. But
Octavius had native abilities or these it was developed by Caesar ?

VALE,
IVL SABINVS


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato T. Iulio Sabino quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salve et salvete.
> The letters of Cicero and Brutus seem to point to a young,
> inexperienced (politically) man who was thrust onto the stage of
> Republican politics --- and liked it. A lot. Gradually it became
> clear that Octavius was very good at manipulating the great men
around
> him, and was given enormous leeway, enabling him to build for himself
> an incredible foundation of political power. Brutus' fears proved
> true.
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37440 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Betreff: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Multae sententiae de constitutione
Salve Flavia,

<It didn´t feel all that spiritless to
> me I must say.
Good for you! I'm happy that you're happy (really!)

Vale,
Diana





____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37441 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
Salve Iulius Sabinus!

Well, the historical record seems to point towards Octavius being a
basic nobody until he became Caesar's heir; even then, he had to be
shepherded along by the likes of Cicero, who thought he was
manipulating Octavius for the "benefit" of the Republic.

With all due respect, the same kind of thing proved itself in the rise
of Adolf Hitler: a brilliant orator, a cunning manipulator, brought
onto the broad political stage by powers that thought they could
control him (the Army General Staff, the owners of the great
businesses) --- only to have him turn on them and grind them under his
thumb.

While I hesitate to put Octavius in the same genre as Hitler, the very
basics are similiar.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37442 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
SALVE EQUITI CATO !

The comparission it isn't new. I saw to the net a whole course about that. Where : " Both rose to prominence in the period of intense social conflict brought on by devastating wars and uncertain peace. In both cultures, traditional values were questioned and neglected; in both cases, their way to power was marked by violence and unconstitutional behavior. As they reached their goals, both preserved the appearance of the constitution, yet systematically undermined the legal order. Both had an interest in architecture and literature; both sought to legitimize their legally uncertain status by grand building projects, by social welfare projects, and by an appeal to traditional family values. "
But all of these are only speculations. Augustus had been remaining in history like one who have a major role in the Republic fall. The Republic fall began before. And here are a lot of theories. For the Gracchi reforms, Punic Wars to the Caesar assassination. For me, Augustus is not a tyrant. Is not a benefactor. Is only a man of his time.

VALETE,
IVL SABINVS




gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
Salve Iulius Sabinus!
With all due respect, the same kind of thing proved itself in the rise
of Adolf Hitler: a brilliant orator, a cunning manipulator, brought
onto the broad political stage by powers that thought they could
control him (the Army General Staff, the owners of the great
businesses) --- only to have him turn on them and grind them under his
thumb.

While I hesitate to put Octavius in the same genre as Hitler, the very
basics are similiar.

Vale bene,

Cato





---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------







"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37443 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
In a message dated 8/28/2005 11:42:21 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
p.bird@... writes:

Now this is a question that has intrigued me for years: what on earth was it
about Cleopatra that made her so desirable, so much so that Mark Antony
could not be drawn away from her? I've seen pictures of her - not just the
coin ones, but the famous bust - and in no way would one call her either
beautiful or attractive; yet Caesar and Antony couldn't resist her.



Nonsense. She was in control of Agyptus which had large resources in grain
and temples
were filled with treasure. She had to be courted.

Octavius did not need her, besides the Senate had charged him with
prosecuting a war against her. Courting her wasn't an option.

Antonius thought that he could control the boy because he lacked military
savvy.

Octavius met Agrippa who was Antonius equal in military matters, and
worshipped
Octavius being a Caesarite.

Octavius out grew his handlers and took on a life and a personality of his
own. Yet he never forgot the people from which all his authority had come.
That was why the Tribunite was abolished. Augustus spoke for and protected
his people now.

Q Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37444 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Parthia and Sassanid Persia
Salve, Im a New Yorker & I post from my cellphone. I
have to simplify. Overall I think that in a NY minute
sort of way I did outline correctly, a lil credit?
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <QFabiusMaxmi@...>
wrote:
> In a message dated 8/29/2005 6:08:06 AM Pacific
Daylight Time,
> praefectus2324@... writes:
> Geographically its the same but it was the Parthians
> Crassvs fell to. They later became the Persians
AGAIN
> and now are the Iraqis. Spooky,huh?
> Gods, man we are over simplfying.
>
> The Persians of Kyrush were conquered by Alexandros
III in 333 BCE, after his
> death (323) the Hellenzation of Asia was completed
by his Successors:
> Ptolmeios, Selekios, Lysimachios, Peridikkas, and
Antigonos (one eye). True
> Achaemenid Persia went to Selekios. King
Antiochios III of the Seleukid Empire
> attempted to restore Alexandros III Persian
conquests as far a Baktrios, which he
> did by (220), but weakened all the kingdoms that he
re-conquered, so much so,
> that the Parthians (Aparni) who were a Steppe people

> migrating from Hsiung_nu pressure in the Tarim
Basin, entered Bacteria circa
> 273, and after
> Antiochios III re-conquest campaign moved into the
weakened areas of the
> Mesopotamia region. Arpani legends have their
"King" (Kahn) Arsaces moving into
> the Seleukid province or satrapy of Parthia (238).
War with King Ptolmeios V
> of Egypt occupied the attention
> of Antiochos III, and he ignored the East. After a
disasterious campaign in
> Greece where he
> ran afoul of Rome, he was ejected and sent east. By
197 he assembled his
> large army
> at Magnesia, where a normal Consul army of four
legiones and allies from
> Pergamon
> under the command of Africanus brother, Consul
Cornelius Scipio, routed the
> army, and much of it was destroyed. With no strong
central army to stop them,
> the Aparni were free to do what they wished. By
140/39 the Apron or Parthians
> as they were now called defeated the Seleukid King,
Demetrios II, who was
> captured. The Parni king Mithradatos, adopted
Persian customs, coined money and
> called himself "Shah of Shahs" The Parthian kingdom
now stretched from Bactria
> to Babylonia. By 128 Mithradatos II had
> invaded Armenia, reopened the Silk Road and opened
relations with the Han
> Chinese.
> By 92 the Parthians had a trade agreement with L.
Cornelius Sulla, and they
> extinguished
> what was left of the Seleukid kingdom by 70. By
this time the Successor
> State of Pontus
> was fighting the Romans in Greece.
> By 66 Parthia had replaced Seleukid kingdom as the
new rulers of Persia.
> While the old provinces of Bactria were gone, the
Parthians controlled most of
> old Persia except Asia Minor, Syria and Egypt.
>
> Rome who saw itself as the protector of the Greeks,
was now ready to clash
> with Parthia over control of Armenia, Syria,
Palestine, (Judea).
> This war would last for on and off period for 200
years.
>
> Sassanids. Even though Zoroastrian Religious
traditions were revived by the
> Arscid dynasty was never viewed as truly viewed as
Persian. These successors
> were like the Greeks, interlopers, and never
completely accepted. Also the
> Parthian Empire was consistently racked by civil
disturbances as different
> families vied for control. As well as the frequent
wars with Rome, over Asian
> territory.
> Legends have it that near Persoplios in Persis that
Sasan of the old
> Achaemenid line, son ran afoul of the Parthian king.
The Royal Army sent against him
> was defeated, and the revolt spread. By 220 CE,
Parthia was in a two front
> war between Rome, and Sasan's youngest son Ardashir.
By 226, he as the true
> descendent of the Achaemenidian Persian lineage met
King Aratbanus V of the
> Arscid line, in battle. The Parthian King was
killed,
> and Ardashir was crowned. By 227, the Parthian
empire was under control of
> an Achaemindian family, the Sassanids. Firm
government, prosperity, and
> cultural standards returned to the Empire, which
could be considered Persian once
> more.
>
> The fall of the Empire to the Arabs we will discuss
at a later date.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail for Mobile
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37445 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Parthia and Sassanid Persia
In a message dated 8/29/2005 3:57:11 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
praefectus2324@... writes:

Im a New Yorker & I post from my cellphone. I
have to simplify. Overall I think that in a NY minute
sort of way I did outline correctly, a lil credit?



Well, not really. Your implication that Parthian and Arabs are Persians was
wrong.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37446 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-08-29
Subject: Re: Parthia and Sassanid Persia
Yikes! Okay, Ill go back to writing tickets now. At
least thats one area I know Im proficient in and wont
be scolded. Geez,
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <QFabiusMaxmi@...>
wrote:
>
> In a message dated 8/29/2005 3:57:11 P.M. Pacific
Daylight Time,
> praefectus2324@... writes:
>
> Im a New Yorker & I post from my cellphone. I
> have to simplify. Overall I think that in a NY
minute
> sort of way I did outline correctly, a lil credit?
>
>
>
> Well, not really. Your implication that Parthian
and Arabs are Persians was
> wrong.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37447 From: mfalco1 Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: House of Ptolemy (offshoot of 'From boy to tyrant...or benefact
M. Ambrosius Falco T. Octavioni Salvio G. Equitio Catoni s.p.d.

Salvete,

Forgive my interjection, I saw your "suggested reading" Cato, and
ordered the book. The post-Alexandrian world has been something of an
interest of mine and I try to learn as much about the period as I
can.

> It always seemed to me that the Ptolemies were the most sucessful
of
> the Diadochi. What happened to the other sucessor kingdoms, like
the
> Selucids and Macedon itself (presumably Rome happened to them)?

Indeed, the Ptolemaic Kingdom was the longest lasting of the
satrapies of Alexander's conquest and I would daresay most
successful. The Seleucids succumbed to both the Romans and Parthians
in 67 bc, and the Antigonids in Greece also succumbed to the power of
Rome in 106 bc. Cleopatra VII Philopator, did not die until I believe
30 bc ending the Ptolemaic line in Egypt.
Valete Bene
Falco

T. Octavioni Salvio
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "t_octavius_salvius" <fin37@h...>
wrote:
> T. Octavius Salvius G. Equitio Catoni S.P.D.
>
> Salve Amice,
>
> > I haven't yet, but I did read an odd little book by Duncan Sprott
> > entitled "the ptolemies"; it's a history of the Ptolemies written
> from
> > the viewpoint of the God Thoth. It's a little bizarre, but a
> great read.
>
>
> I'll have a look out for that! I think I'm catching Ptolemy-fever
> (not to be confused with Malaria).
>
> It always seemed to me that the Ptolemies were the most sucessful
of
> the Diadochi. What happened to the other sucessor kingdoms, like
the
> Selucids and Macedon itself (presumably Rome happened to them)?
>
> vale
>
> T. Octavius Salvius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37448 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: House of Ptolemy (offshoot of 'From boy to tyrant...or benefact
G. Equitius Cato M. Ambrosio Falconi T. Octaviano Salvio quiritibusque
S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Falco, I think you'll enjoy it. Like I said, it's a little odd (I
mean, the God Thoth is the narrator!) buit very entertaining and
actually quite accurate, historically.

As far as the others of the Diadochi, the most famous besides the
Ptolemies were the Seleucids, whose authority included Palestine. The
revolt of the Jews against the last of them, Antiochus IV
"Epiphanies", gave rise to the heroic stories of the Maccabees and the
eventual control of Palestine by Rome.

In 167 B.C., Antiochus erected a statue of Zeus in the Temple in
Jerusalem and sacrificed a pig on the altar there --- the most
horrendous of abominations conceivable to the Jews. They revolted
under the leadership of the Maccabee (or Hasmonean) family, and were
victorious; the cleansing of the Temple and the lighting of the great
seven-branched candlestick in the Court of the Hebrews which remained
burning for eight days even though there was only oil sufficient for
one day is commemorated as the Festival of Lights, or Hanukkah.

In 143 B.C., after years of turmoil against the house of the
Seleucids, the Maccabees succeeded in gaining both political and
sacerdotal power in Palestine; although there was a great deal of
infighting amongst the heirs of the Maccabees, it was only the civil
war between two brothers, John Hyrcanus II and Aristobulus II, which
ended in the intervention by Rome and the conquering of Palestine by
Pompey in 63 B.C.

Valete bene,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "mfalco1" <mfalco1@y...> wrote:
> M. Ambrosius Falco T. Octavioni Salvio G. Equitio Catoni s.p.d.
>
> Salvete,
>
> Forgive my interjection, I saw your "suggested reading" Cato, and
> ordered the book. The post-Alexandrian world has been something of an
> interest of mine and I try to learn as much about the period as I
> can.
>
> > It always seemed to me that the Ptolemies were the most sucessful
> of
> > the Diadochi. What happened to the other sucessor kingdoms, like
> the
> > Selucids and Macedon itself (presumably Rome happened to them)?
>
> Indeed, the Ptolemaic Kingdom was the longest lasting of the
> satrapies of Alexander's conquest and I would daresay most
> successful. The Seleucids succumbed to both the Romans and Parthians
> in 67 bc, and the Antigonids in Greece also succumbed to the power of
> Rome in 106 bc. Cleopatra VII Philopator, did not die until I believe
> 30 bc ending the Ptolemaic line in Egypt.
> Valete Bene
> Falco
>
> T. Octavioni Salvio
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "t_octavius_salvius" <fin37@h...>
> wrote:
> > T. Octavius Salvius G. Equitio Catoni S.P.D.
> >
> > Salve Amice,
> >
> > > I haven't yet, but I did read an odd little book by Duncan Sprott
> > > entitled "the ptolemies"; it's a history of the Ptolemies written
> > from
> > > the viewpoint of the God Thoth. It's a little bizarre, but a
> > great read.
> >
> >
> > I'll have a look out for that! I think I'm catching Ptolemy-fever
> > (not to be confused with Malaria).
> >
> > It always seemed to me that the Ptolemies were the most sucessful
> of
> > the Diadochi. What happened to the other sucessor kingdoms, like
> the
> > Selucids and Macedon itself (presumably Rome happened to them)?
> >
> > vale
> >
> > T. Octavius Salvius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37449 From: c_fabia_livia@yahoo.co.uk Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Ludi Romani
The Ludi Romani will run from 5 - 19 September.

To enter the chariot races, or to enter a gladiator and/or animal for the fights, you need to send me an email before SEPTEMBER 3RD.

You need to tell me your Roman name, and your faction if you have one. You also need to give me specific information for the kind of contest you wish to enter (you can enter all three if you like):

CHARIOTS
the name of your driver, and a description (as detailed as you like) of the tactics you would like to use in the first heat. You will be able to change these for any subsequent races if you qualify.

GLADIATORS
the name of your gladiator, what weapons he is armed with, and a description (as detailed as you like) of his appearance, general personality, and any specific tactics he intends to use.

ANIMALS
what kind of animal you are entering into the contest, and any particular tactics you have in mind.

Remember to send me your entries for the first round of each contest by September 3rd.

Livia



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37450 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: FYI: HBO Rome mini-series Yahoogroup found.
Salve,

I just did a search on Yahoogroups and found a group for the Rome
mini-series. Here's the URL for it:
http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/romehbo/ it
has 85 members. My membership is pending.

Vale,
Quintus Servilius Priscus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37451 From: M. Gladius Agricola Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Our project needs some help
A citizen approaches the Forum. He hears the songs of birds. A fresh
breeze is blowing between the buildings. Entering the Forum, he sees
groups of citizens engaged in calm discussion. He looks around
thinking "Am I in the right place?". Walking on, he pauses to glance
into a basilica. He sees a number of citizens tied to the columns
inside. They are gagged. He shakes his head and walks on, muttering
"Politicians DO have strange ways...". Arriving at the middle of the
Forum he says:



Citizens and Friends, I come seeking assistance with a project that
aims to contribute to the good of the Republic. I ask two things.

First, I seek an artist. This person will be asked to assist with
drawing figures (Gods, horses and eagles particularly) using a
computer. The file format is now large scale bitmaps. Please reply
directly to me if you can help.

Second, I call on citizens in every macronation to assist in the task
of finding a mint for the next Nova Roma sestertius. The sestertius is
32mm in diameter and brass. We need to find a mint that can handle
coins of this size in the quantity of several thousands. If you find
anything, please let me know.



Thanks to you all

M. Gladius Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37452 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: a.d III Kal. Sept.
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Today is ante diem III Kalendas Septembris; the day is Comitialis.

"Amor et melle et felle est fecundissimus." (Love is rich with both
honey and venom) - Plautus, Cistellaria

"Between Camillus' resignation of office and Manlius' entrance on his
Dictatorship, the tribunes held a council of the plebs as though an
interregnum had occurred. Here it was evident which of the proposed
measures were preferred by the plebs and which their tribunes were
most eager about. The measures dealing with usury and the allotment of
State land were being adopted, that providing that one consul should
always be a plebeian was rejected; both the former would probably have
been carried into law if the tribunes had not said that they were
putting them en bloc. P. Manlius, on his nomination as Dictator,
strengthened the cause of the plebs by appointing a plebeian, C.
Licinius, who had been a consular tribune, as his Master of the Horse.
I gather that the patricians were much annoyed; the Dictator generally
defended his action on the ground of relationship; he pointed out also
that the authority of a Master of the Horse was no greater than that
of a consular tribune. When notice was given for the election of
tribunes of the plebs, Licinius and Sextius declared their
unwillingness to be re-elected, but they put it in a way which made
the plebeians all the more eager to secure the end which they secretly
had in view. For nine years, they said, they had been standing in
battle array, as it were, against the patricians, at the greatest risk
to themselves and with no advantage to the people. The measures they
had brought forward and the whole power of the tribunes had, like
themselves, become enfeebled by age. Their proposed legislation had
been frustrated first by the veto of their colleagues, then by the
withdrawal of their fighting men to the district of Velitrae, and last
of all the Dictator had launched his thunders at them. At the present
time there was no obstacle either from their colleagues or from war or
from the Dictator, for he had given them an earnest of the future
election of plebeian consuls by appointing a plebeian as Master of the
Horse. It was the plebs who stood in the way of their tribunes and
their own interests. If they chose they could have a City and a Forum
free from creditors, and fields rescued from their unlawful occupiers.
When were they ever going to show sufficient gratitude for these
boons, if while accepting these beneficial measures they cut off from
those who proposed them all hope of attaining the highest honours? It
was not consistent with the self-respect of the Roman people for them
to demand to be relieved of the burden of usury and placed on the land
which is now wrongfully held by the magnates, and then to leave the
tribunes, through whom they won these reforms, without honourable
distinction in their old age or any hope of attaining it. They must
first make up their minds as to what they really wanted and then
declare their will by their votes at the election. If they wanted the
proposed measures carried as a whole, there was some reason for their
re-electing the same tribunes, because they would carry their own
measures through; if, however, they only wished that to be passed
which each man happened to want for himself, there was no need for
them to incur odium by prolonging their term of office; they would not
have the tribuneship themselves, nor would the people obtain the
proposed reforms." - Livy, History of Rome 6.39


On this day in 30 B.C., Queen Cleopatra VII, the last of the Ptolemid
pharaohs, committed suicide upon learning that Marc Antony had been
defeated and that Octavian planned to parade her through the streets
of Rome not in triumph at his side, but as a spoil of war. Whether or
not she killed herself using an asp is not known; but it was an
Egyptian belief that death by snakebite secured immortality. Several
experts, however, disagree, and their conclusions can be found here:

http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/9444.html

A fascinating bit of detective work.

"There was a young man of distinction among Caesar's companions, named
Cornelius Dolabella. He was not without a certain tenderness for
Cleopatra, and sent her word privately, as she had besought him to do,
that Caesar was about to return through Syria, and that she and her
children were to be sent on within three days. When she understood
this, she made her request to Caesar that he would be pleased to
permit her to make oblations to the departed Antony; which being
granted, she ordered herself to be carried to the place where he was
buried, and there, accompanied by her women, she embraced his tomb
with tears in her eyes, and spoke in this manner: "O, dearest Antony,"
said she, "it is not long since that with these hands I buried you;
then they were free, now I am a captive, and pay these last duties to
you with a guard upon me, for fear that my just griefs and sorrows
should impair my servile body, and make it less fit to appear in their
triumph over you. No further offerings or libations expect from me;
these are the last honors that Cleopatra can pay your memory, for she
is to be hurried away far from you. Nothing could part us whilst we
lived, but death seems to threaten to divide us. You, a Roman born,
have found a grave in Egypt; I, an Egyptian, am to seek that favor,
and none but that, in your country. But if the gods below, with whom
you now are, either can or will do anything (since those above have
betrayed us), suffer not your living wife to be abandoned; let me not
be led in triumph to your shame, but hide me and bury me here with
you, since, amongst all my bitter misfortunes, nothing has afflicted
me like this brief time that I have lived away from you."

Having made these lamentations, crowning the tomb with garlands and
kissing it, she gave orders to prepare her a bath, and, coming out of
the bath, she lay down and made a sumptuous meal. And a country fellow
brought her a little basket, which the guards intercepting and asking
what it was, the fellow put the leaves which lay uppermost aside, and
showed them it was full of figs; and on their admiring the largeness
and beauty of the figs, he laughed, and invited them to take some,
which they refused, and, suspecting nothing, bade him carry them in.
After her repast, Cleopatra sent to Caesar a letter which she had
written and sealed; and, putting everybody out of the monument but her
two women, she shut the doors. Caesar, opening her letter, and finding
pathetic prayers and entreaties that she might be buried in the same
tomb with Antony, soon guessed what was doing. At first he was going
himself in all haste, but, changing his mind, he sent others to see.
The thing had been quickly done. The messengers came at full speed,
and found the guards apprehensive of nothing; but on opening the
doors, they saw her stone-dead, lying upon a bed of gold, set out in
all her royal ornaments. Iras, one of her women, lay dying at her
feet, and Charmion, just ready to fall, scarce able to hold up her
head, was adjusting her mistress's diadem. And when one that came in
said angrily, "Was this well done of your lady, Charmion?" "Extremely
well," she answered, "and as became the descendant of so many kings";
and as she said this, she fell down dead by the bedside.

Some relate that an asp was brought in amongst those figs and covered
with the leaves, and that Cleopatra had arranged that it might settle
on her before she knew, but, when she took away some of the figs and
saw it, she said, "So here it is," and held out her bare arm to be
bitten. Others say that it was kept in a vase, and that she vexed and
pricked it with a golden spindle till it seized her arm. But what
really took place is known to no one. Since it was also said that she
carried poison in a hollow bodkin, about which she wound her hair; yet
there was not so much as a spot found, or any symptom of poison upon
her body, nor was the asp seen within the monument; only something
like the trail of it was said to have been noticed on the sand by the
sea, on the part towards which the building faced and where the
windows were. Some relate that two faint puncture-marks were found on
Cleopatra's arm, and to this account Caesar seems to have given
credit; for in his triumph there was carried a figure of Cleopatra,
with an asp clinging to her. Such are the various accounts. But
Caesar, though much disappointed by her death, yet could not but
admire the greatness of her spirit, and gave order that her body
should he buried by Antony with royal splendor and magnificence. Her
women, also, received honorable burial by his directions. Cleopatra
had lived nine and thirty years, during twenty-two of which she had
reigned as queen, and for fourteen had been Antony's partner in his
empire. Antony, according to some authorities, was fifty-three,
according to others, fifty-six years old. His statues were all thrown
down, but those of Cleopatra were left untouched; for Archibius, one
of her friends, gave Caesar two thousand talents to save them from the
fate of Antony's." - Plutarch, Parallel Lives, "Antony"

In Central Park in New York City, one of the obelisks from the
Caesarium in Alexandria stands, called "Cleopatra's Needle". It is
actually the work of Thutmosis III and was originally placed in
Heliopolis, but was moved, some sources saying by the emperor
Augustus, in 23 B.C. On each side of each pyramidion (the "cap"
triangle of the obelisk), Tuthmosis III is drawn as a sphinx making
offerings to the gods of Heliopolis, and each side of the obelisk is
inscribed with three columns of hieroglyphs. The central column was
carved for Tuthmosis III, and subsidiary columns both sides were added
by Ramses II. Although the hieroglyph is almost impossible to read it
due to the heavy damage, it is said the central column states "the
pyramidion illuminates the town of Heliopolis". Its sister obelisk
stands in London on the Victoria Embankment, near the Houses of
Parliament on the Thames River waterfront.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy (http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/Livy/Livy06.html), Cleopatra's
death
(http://ancienthistory.about.com/library/bl/bl_tex
t_plutarch_antony.htm),
"Cleopatra's Needle"
(http://members.aol.com/Sokamoto31/obelisk.htm#alllist),
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37453 From: C·ARMINIVS·RECCANELLVS Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: Ludi Romani
I'm interested in participate in the games!! But, I don't know how it works!

Is there a site where I can have some answers?????

Valete
C·ARMINIVS·RECCANELLVS
PROPRAETOR·PROVINCIAE·BRASILIAE
"Quousque tandem, Lula, abutere patientia nostra?"

----- Original Message -----
From: c_fabia_livia@...
To: NR main
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 4:14 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Ludi Romani
The Ludi Romani will run from 5 - 19 September.
To enter the chariot races, or to enter a gladiator and/or animal for the fights, you need to send me an email before SEPTEMBER 3RD.
You need to tell me your Roman name, and your faction if you have one. You also need to give me specific information for the kind of contest you wish to enter (you can enter all three if you like):
CHARIOTS
the name of your driver, and a description (as detailed as you like) of the tactics you would like to use in the first heat. You will be able to change these for any subsequent races if you qualify.
GLADIATORS
the name of your gladiator, what weapons he is armed with, and a description (as detailed as you like) of his appearance, general personality, and any specific tactics he intends to use.
ANIMALS
what kind of animal you are entering into the contest, and any particular tactics you have in mind.
Remember to send me your entries for the first round of each contest by September 3rd.
Livia

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37454 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: Ludi Romani
G. Equitius Cato C. Fabiae Liviae quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve Aedile et salvete omnes!

Although *both* of my boys (Scylla and Charybdis) got eaten at the
last games, I am a glutton for punishment. Therefore, I am going to
enter another tiger, Fulgorus ("Lightning") and an elephant, Tonitrus
("Thunder"). Why not throw good money after bad?

See you in the ampitheatre!

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37455 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: House of Ptolemy
Salvete Omnes,

> Indeed, the Ptolemaic Kingdom was the longest lasting of the
> satrapies of Alexander's conquest and I would daresay most
> successful. The Seleucids succumbed to both the Romans and
Parthians
> in 67 bc, and the Antigonids in Greece also succumbed to the power
of
> Rome in 106 bc.


I think I read somewhere (possibly on this very forum!) that one of
the (many) reasons for the collapse of the sucessor kingdoms was
that they did not update their battle tactics and let their armies
decline.

Phalangites were still used, but were of a lesser quality than the
ones in Alexander's time. They also wore little armour and many had
no secondary weapon to use incase the phalanx broke.

The use of cavalry was also scaled right down from Alexander's day
(remember he was usually at the head of the Companions), so the
standard 'hammer and anvil' tactic was no longer as effective.

These obsolete armies were carved up by the manoeuvrable Roman
maniples. This was demonstrated at the battle of Pydna, when Paulus
orded the legions to run into the gaps between the phalanxes,
resulting in some 25,000 casualties.

vale

T. Octavius Salvius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37456 From: Lucius Lusus Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: De precationibus sinceris
Auete

Lucius Iulius Lusus omnibus salutem dicit.

Care Marce Horati, I found your speech about the sincerity of mind and purity of heart as key aspects in the Religio Romana very impressive, and I agree with you. But I must pay attention to the very sensorial and sometiemes sensual aspects of the core of paganism.

I frequently see the pagan rites as celebrations of the most basic pysiological needs sublimated into divinity. Pagan rituals frequently involved sacrifices of animals because the animals were eaten by the assistants thereafter. In ancient times there were no refridgerators, meat was to eaten immediately and a party was made around the mealing. A modern pagan ritual, in my opinion, would by faithful to their past versions, if it involves a lot of food and drinking, which fortunately in the Western World, we have a lot and can buy it very practically in supermarkets. The key question is how to integrate the physiological needs of the mortal organism into a higher order of cosmic immortality and, in this way, make them a gift to Gods. Most probably this will be done by poetry and witty speechs, sincerely felt, just like hunger, lust and need for intoxication can be deeply sincerely felt.

Great Bacchus, exhilarate my bottle of bear,
Bring Silenus and the rest of your companion:
And, Winds of Cupid, don´t let me faint.
But instead rise me to the kisses of my beauty.

Valete

Lucius Iulius Lusus

Marcus Horatius <mhoratius@...> wrote:
Salve bene Cai Cato

Scripsisti:
The idea being that how you approach (the) God(s) spiritually is at
least as important, if not more, than the mechanisms by which you do
so. Which leads me to the most important question I have. You seem
to be building on the foundation that the religio is a faith-based
practice, rather than orthopractical --- or, rather than solely
orthopractical. Is this in fact the case as far as the ancients were
concerned? Or is it an adaptation of the religio to fit into the
ideas we have been brought up with regarding religion and/or faith in a Western, Judeo-Christian-assimilated world?




"The Gods rejoice more in the innocence of worshippers than in elaborate prayers; the man who enters Their temples with a pure heart is more agreeable to the Gods than anyone who recites a carefully prepared litany (Pliny the Younger Panegyric 3).



Rigidly following a formalistic rite with exactness, paying attention that every little detail is performed in presumed correctness, when done without spirituality, is nothing more than superstition (Cicero De Natura Deorum 2.70-72). Outward performance without inner spirituality is an offense against the Gods. That was the judgement of Jupiter on Tullus Hostilius for his "perversion of religion" (Pliny the Elder Natural History 28.14; Valerius Maximus 9.12.1; Livy 1.31.8). Focusing so greatly on how its rituals are to be performed correctly serves only to make the religio Romana into a superstition. That is, if you neglect the spiritual aspects of the religio Romana and the requirement for spirituality when performing its rites.





Ad Divos adeunto caste, pietatem adhibento, opes amovento.

Qui secus faxit, Deus ipse vindex erit.



Cicero De Legibus VIII (19)



"May they approach the Gods and Goddesses while pure and chaste, bringing piety, and leaving riches behind. Whosoever should do otherwise, will be avenged upon by the Gods Themselves."



When the time came for Vei to be removed from Her temple in Etruria to Rome, Camillus selected out certain young men for the task. They cleansed themselves at the river and donned white garments. But it was the reverence that they showed towards the Goddess that allowed them to approach Her (Livy 5.22.4-5). Cicero is quite clear on this point in explaining the law he provided above.



Cicero De Legibus II.x, 24-5:



"that is, purity of mind, for everything is included by that. This does not remove the requirement of bodily purityÂ…for in the former case impurity is removed by the sprinkling of water or the passage of a certain number of days, but a mental stain can neither be blotted out by the passage of time nor washed away by any stream. Â…uprightness is pleasing to the Gods, but great expenditure is to be avoidedÂ…nothing would be less pleasing to a God Himself than that the pathway to His favour and to His worship should not be open to all alike."





The only acceptable offerings to present to the Gods are "holiness of mind and purity of hearth (Persius Satires 2.73-74)."



"But the best and also the most chaste, holiest and most pious way of worshipping the Gods is ever to venerate Them with purity, sincerity, and innocence both in thought and of speech (Cicero De Natura Deorum 2.71)."


You might also look again at the inscription I posted earlier:


CIL VI 18817



"Whole-heartedly I pray to you, most holy Manes, may you admit my dear husband among you, and, may you want to be most indulging in this, that in the hours of the night I may see him and also be advised by him on what to do, in order that I may be able to swiftly and sweetly come stand by his side."


What is this woman really saying here? Doesn't she fully expect to see and hear her deceased husband, as she expects him to now become one of her Lares? And what does she hope for, for herself, by receiving his advice now? Isn't she implying that one's fate in the afterlife depends on what one does in life? But is she implying that it depends on rigidly following some ritual formulae, or is she instead saying that one act in life sincerely towards the Gods, chaste and pure in one's thoughts, words, and deeds?

Roman understanding of pietas is not the same as Christian piety. And Roman fides is not the same as a Christian understanding of faith. I do not know exactly what you may mean by a faith-based religion, because I am not, and I have never been a Christian, or for that matter a Jew or Muslim. You could say that Roman orthopraxy results from Roman pietas and fides. Pietas involves maintaining rites for one's Lares, and also maintaining rites vowed to the Gods by one's ancestors. And fides concerns the reciprical obligations that build up in the relationship between the Gods and mortal through faithfully abiding in one's pietas. How the two interrelate, you cannot expect the Gods to trust in your vows to Them if you do not keep to the obligations you owe to your Lares. And the Lares are not going to trust in any vows you make to them if you do not keep the obligations you owe to others in this life. There is a whole lot more to the practice of the religio Romana than just "going
through the motions."

Varro said, "The superstitious man fears the Gods, the religious man reveres Them as he would his parents, for They are good, more apt to spare than punish." (Frag. 47 Card.) From that same idea you find other expressions of trust in the Gods.


Petronius Satyricon 98

In You, dearest Father, in Your hands do we place our safekeeping.

In tua, pater carissime, in tua sumus custodia.



Propertius Eligiae 4.9.74

Holy One, may You wish to be with me and Your guiding right hand in my books.

Sancte, velis libro dexter inesse meo.



Valerius Flaccus, Argonautica 4.674-5

"Whosoever You may be among the Gods, I shall follow wherever You may lead, in faithful trust that You do not deceive."


These are not expressions of people quivering in fear of Gods lest they make some minor error in ritual. Tullius Hostilius was not struck down be Jupiter for improperly reciting the formula used by Numa, but rather because he approached the Gods without the same sincerity in worship as had Numa Pompilius. And also in Dio Cassius, Roman History, book 78, section 15, as Nantonos Aedui pointed out in my class at Academia Thule, the character and cruelty of the emperor Caracalla (called Antoninus here) alienated him from the Gods:

"But to Antoninus not even one of the Gods gave any response that conduced to healing either his body or his mind, although he paid homage to all the more prominent ones. This showed most clearly that They regarded not his votive offerings or his sacrifices, but only his purposes and his deeds. He received no help from Apollo Grannus, nor yet from Aesculapius or Serapis, in spite of his many supplications and his unwearying persistence. For even while abroad he sent to Them prayers, sacrifices and votive offerings, and many couriers ran hither and thither every day carrying something of this kind; and he also went to them himself, hoping to prevail by appearing in person, and did all that devotees are wont to do; but he obtained nothing that contributed to health."


The religio Romana is not at all about how you physically perform a rite. Faith in the Gods, sincere worship of the Gods, purity of heart when approaching the Gods, mindfulness, with spirituality, is essential in the performance of Roman ritual, and along with that is also how you live your life. I don't know how one would have faith in the Gods without also believing in the existence of the Gods. So that is part of it too, but we leave it to the individual to find the Gods for himself or herself, and for people to find their own understanding of the Gods. Belief comes through experiencing the Gods, and that has to come to each person individually, but it does come through a way of life in relationship with the Gods. So my understanding of "faith-based practice" may be a little different from yours, but yes, that is how I view the religio Romana.

Vale optime et vade in Deos
Piscinus



Community email addresses:
Post message: ReligioRomana@onelist.com
Subscribe: ReligioRomana-subscribe@onelist.com
Unsubscribe: ReligioRomana-unsubscribe@onelist.com
List owner: ReligioRomana-owner@onelist.com

Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/ReligioRomana



---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "ReligioRomana" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ReligioRomana-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37457 From: Marcus Traianus Valerius Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: Is Rome Empty?
Savle,

The pleasure is mine. I need to do some work on that site and it will be coming along in the next few months as I will have some time near the holidays to dedicate a few hours a day for a week or so to just that site.

Thanks for visiting!

Vale,
MTV

Ita di deaque faxint!
Marcus Traianus Valerius


Titus Iulius Sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
SALVE MARCE TRAIANE !

Very nice to meet you here. I saw your gens website some time ago.
It's wonderful. We, the peoples from Dacia, are very interested
about all the references about Traian. Your work wasn't uselessly.
Thanks.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Marcus Traianus Valerius
<genstraiana@y...> wrote:
> Cato,
>
> I must have missed your original post, that you were not going to
talk about the aforementioned "items". Wow, come to think of it,
you have been rather quite...
>
> Pax,
>
>
>
> gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@y...> wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato L. Claudio Romulo S.P.D.
>
> Salve Romulus!
>
> Rome is not empty; we've all just gone to Sorrentum for the August
> holidays :-)
>
> One small thing that may have kept the Forum a little quieter than
> usual (as far as I'm concerned at least) is a vow I made not to
talk
> about law or politics for one week. The week is almost up (it ends
> Wednesday, 31 August)...
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The roman empire
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> Ita di deaque faxint!
> Marcus Traianus Valerius
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Gens Traiana Home Page
> www.geocities.com/genstraiana
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





Ita di deaque faxint!
Marcus Traianus Valerius

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37458 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: Parthia and Sassanid Persia
In a message dated 8/29/2005 8:33:27 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
praefectus2324@... writes:
Yikes! Okay, Ill go back to writing tickets now. At
least thats one area I know Im proficient in and wont
be scolded. Geez,
Hey I need a ticket fixed...Who do you know in LA?

Fabius


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37459 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: Parthia and Sassanid Persia
Salvete omnes,

I think the gods once punished QLP for enjoying too much oppulance
whence oil prices crashed in 86. We all got layed off from our oil
field consulting work and I ended up working for Pinkerton Security
in one of our big office buildings for almost minimum wage... old
Quintus has had his problems!

Anyway I had the mandate to issue city parking tickets for the area
around the building and I found it a dreadful task! I felt like the
lowest most hated person in the world, even lower than a Revenue
Canada or IRS agent. Girls that made current popular actresses look
mediocre would saunter up and ply their charms to get out of a
ticket yet when I would not give in, the language that came out of
their pretty mouths... " You f..." well lets say it was enough to
make a prostitiute blush and a hardened sailor barff. Alas, I
figured a policeman making 50 - 60 K a year would be willing to put
up with this but not me for the handsome sum of 5.00 per hour.

QFM, I do not know about LA but here in Edmonton, if you take the
trouble to show up in court, especially for tickets 100.00 or less
the police or meter maids are not going to show up in court to
challenge your dispute. More often than not you'll get a discharge.
Ultimately if you refuse to pay, they just won't renew your vehicle
registration on the yearly expiry date unless you include that
ticket payment.

Regards,

QLP










--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 8/29/2005 8:33:27 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> praefectus2324@y... writes:
> Yikes! Okay, Ill go back to writing tickets now. At
> least thats one area I know Im proficient in and wont
> be scolded. Geez,
> Hey I need a ticket fixed...Who do you know in LA?
>
> Fabius
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37460 From: Tribune Albucius Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: REPORT of the SENATE SESSION (modified)
Trb. Albucius Paulino, Athanasio, Calvo aliis omnibusque s.d.

S.V.B.E.E.V.


Please find below a modified version of my edict 58-18 of the 5th
august reporting the last Senate session.

I have corrected some formal errors, like the numbering of the
articles or the number of the voting and non-voting senators. Though
they were in the consular message, attached to my edict, I have re-
included the comments made by Illustri senators : these comments
have technically been dropped off from the edited version. I have at
last taken in consideration the informations given by Censor
Marinus, recently confirmed by the Consuls on my request, on the
resignation of two senators and status of senator Drusus.

Several questions have arisen through the 25 messages posted in the
ML between late 5th and 11th August on my edict of publication. You
will find in a next message in this forum my answer to these
interesting remarks.


Valete omnes,

P. Memmius Albucius
Tribunus Plebis

_____________________________________________________________________
_____________

TRIBUNE P. MEMMIUS ALBUCIUS EDICT (n° 58-18) ON THE REPORT
OF THE RESULT OF THE SENATE SESSION


I, Publius Memmius Albucius, Tribune of the Plebs, by the authority
vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of Nova Roma,

In view of the Constitution of Nova Roma, specially its article
IV.A.7.d ;
In view of Senate sessions reporting Moravia Law Nov.15,
2756 a.u.c. ;
In view of Consul Fr. Apulus Caesar's Edict dated 4 January 2005
convening
the Senate ;
In view of my Edict of 2nd August 2005 (58-17) on the communication
of the Senate session ;
In view of the session of the Senate which began on 24th July 2005
and ended on 30th July 2005, and
whose vote ended on 4th August 2005, 18:00 hours (Rome time);
In view of Consul Fr. Apulus Caesar message (extracts below),
displayed on the Senate list on 4th August 2005 at 18 :04,
proclaiming the results of the Senate vote ;
Considering the need to correct the counting of the votes made by
Illustrus Consul Caesar on items 2 and 3 submitted to the vote,

Edicts :

Article 1 :

The citizens, the People and the plebs of Nova Roma are informed
that the Senate session, duly convened by Consul Fr. Apulus Caesar,
has
ended at 21.00 p.m. (Rome time) on July 2005, 30th its session begun
at 21 :00 p.m. (Rome time) on July 2005, 24th.

The Senate has also ended its vote, which has last from 21.00 hours
(Rome time) on 24th July 2005, ended at 21:00 hours (Rome time) on
30th July 2005.


Article 2 :

Five points were in the agenda of the Senate, detailed in my
previous edict 58-17 (2nd August 2005):

# 1 - APPOINTMENT OF NEW PROPRAETOR OF PROVINCIA AMERICA
MEDIOCCIDENTALIS SUPERIOR

# 2 - REMOVAL OF INTERPRETERS AND LICTORES

# 3 - PERMISSION TO USE THE NOVA ROMAN LOGOS

# 4 - BANK ACCOUNT IN EUROPE

# 5 - LEX IVLIA DE FORO ET MODERATIONE



Article 3 :

The details of the vote communicated by the consular message are the
following :

1/ The quorum has been reached since nineteen (19) senators,
representing 68 % of the senators, have voted.

2/ These 19 senators are the following (in no particular order) :

FAC - Franciscus Apulus Caesar
GPL - G. Popillius Laenas
GEM - Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
CFBQ - Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
LAF - Lucius Arminius Faustus
LEF - L. Emilia Finnica
PMTS - P. Minucia Tiberia Strabo
JSM - J. Sempronia Magna
GFL - G. Fabia Livia
LSA - L. Sergius Australicus
LECA - Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus Augur
TLF - T Labienus Fortunatus
MMTA - Marcus Minucius-Tiberius Audens
MIP - Marcus Iulius Perusianus
MAM - Marcus Arminius Maior
GMM - Gaius Marius Merullus
QFM - Q. Fabius Maximus
AGG - Antonius Gryllus Graecus
MOG - Marcus Octavius Germanicus



3/ The following are the votes cast by each present and voting
senator, «UR» meaning «UTI ROGAS» (i.e. «yes»), ABS
meaning «abstineo» (i.e. «abstain» ), and ANT meaning «antique»
(i.e. «no»).

On the second item, some senators chose, with the approval of the
presiding consul, to separate their vote between the vote for the
removal of the non-taxpaying interpreters and non-taxpaying lictors.
So you will find, for example, votes like «UR, ANT».

Each vote cast on every item submitted to vote is reported here (so
for example, UR/ABS/UR must be
read as «yes to the first question; abstain on the 2nd; yes on the
third item») :


FAC - UR/UR/UR

Item II
Removal of Lictors and Interpreters

Working for a better law cohordinating the tax-
raising with the annual elections, I think teh law should be applied
and the following gentlemen removed from their own Offices.

Item III
Permission to use the NR logos

I remember to illustrus Agrippa that the permission
by the Senatus would be followed by the approval of the membership in
the Ordo Equester.


GPL - UR/UR/UR
GEM - UR/UR,ABS/UR

CFBQ - UR/UR/UR (proxy to Consul FAC)

Item II
Removal of Lictors and Interpreters

It's quite clear that there was a misenderstood about the vote on
this item. It seems that the law about Assidui et Capite Censi seems
couldn't be applied to the Lictores which must to be judged by the
Conitia Curiata called by the Pontifex Maximus. For this reason I
divided the result of this item in two voices, one official for
interpreters and one un-official for Lictores inviting the Pontifex
Maximus to find a solution as soon as possible.
So, the Interpreters which are members of the Capite Censi at the
end of the current Senatus Consultum, are removed from their Office
with immediate effect.


LAF - UR/UR/UR (proxy to Consul FAC) obs. :

Item II : follow the law.
Item III : I was unable to follow the matter.

LEF - UR/UR/UR

PMTS - UR/ABS,ABS/UR

Item II
Removal of Lictors and Interpreters

i) Dismissal of Lictors:
I do not see where we can do this, and I am sorry that I didn't
think of this sooner, ever having served as one. The Lictors are
appointed by the CP, and I refer you to the constitutional language
III Comitia
A: "The comitia curiata (Assembly of Curaie) shall be made up of 30
lictors curatae, appointed to their positions by the collegium
pontificum. It shall be called or order by the Pontifex Maximus, and
the CP shall set the rules by which the comitia curiata shall
operate internally....."
Do I think Lictors should pay taxes? Certainly. But it is not up to
the Senate to dismiss them, in my view....internal affairs of the
Collegium Pontificium
ii In the removal of Interpreters: Even if not magistrates, they are
Senate appointed. And unless they can be clearly established as
ordinarii, we can't consider their positions null and void due to
nontax payment by any existing law, atleast that I can see. But, I
believe we can as the senate use this criteria despite this, if we
so choose, in judging whether or not to retain their services. I
have no problem with assigning this criteria for interpreters.
****We are being asked to interfere in what I feel is
consitutionally out of our jurisdiction in the matter of lictores,
and moreover, the list presented in this ballot contains both
lictors and interpreters...incidentally two of the lictors according
to the latest report by Tiberius Galerius Paulinus have paid their
taxes since this ballot was constructed.
Since we are dealing with two different matters, one of which I
don't see the Senate being involved in legally, and one I do, I
shall vote
ABSTAIN****


MOG - UR/UR/UR
JSM - UR/UR, ANT/UR
GFL - UR/UR/UR

LSA - UR/UR/UR

Item III
Permission to use the NR logos

I would hope that anyone authorized to sell items under the auspices
of Nova Roma is required to attest to the basic safety of what they
sell there. If this is not so, let us take steps to make it so.


LECA - UR/UR, ANT/UR

Item II
Removal of Lictors and Interpreters

ANTIQVO to the dismissal of the Lictores.
As has been rightly stated that is the under the jurisdiction of the
Comitia Curiata presided over by the Pontifex Maximus and appointed
by the College Pontificum. "III. Comitia A. The comitia curiata
(Assembly of Curiae) shall be made up of thirty lictores curiati
(lictors of the curia), appointed to their position by the collegium
pontificum (college of pontiffs). It shall be called to order by the
Pontifex Maximus, and the collegium pontificum shall set the rules
by which the comitia curiata shall operate internally..."
We haven't addressed the issue of non tax paying Lictores. Who would
think that someone appointed to such an honorable and exclusive
comitia wouldn't support the republic of which it is a part? But
then, we've had many other things happen that make even less sense.
Cincinnatus Augur: VTI ROGAS, to the removal of delinquent
interpreters. Since they are appointed by the Senate we have a
perfect right to dismiss them.


TLF - UR/UR, ABS/UR

Item II
Removal of Lictors and Interpreters

With respect to the interpretes: VTI ROGAS - With respect to
the lictores of the comitia curiata: ABSTINEO
While I see nothing wrong with the Senatus giving its advice in this
matter--after all, that is what the Senatus does--Senatrix Minucia-
Tiberia is quite correct that this body does not have the authority
to dismiss lictores curiatae. That is, indeed, the purview of the
Collegium Pontificum.


MMTA - UR/ABS/ABS

Item II
Removal of Lictors and Interpreters

I abstain from this voter from a hesitatation
brought about by the determination of Senator Tiberia. She has
mentioned some aspects that I had not considered, and until they are
made clearer I will abstain on this matter.

Item III
Permission to use the NR logos

My reasoning here is because of a recent report of
several children being severely burned (3rd degree burns over a
large percentage of thier body) by t-shirts which were made of
wholly or a large portion of synthetic
products.
When the T-shirts burned these products melted into the burned
areas, and caused a signifiicant increase in the burn severity.
Since I do not wish my name or my organizations linked with such
dangerous practices in regard to children, I will abstain my vote
until such time I I find out what kind of material these t-shirts
are being made of.


MIP - UR/UR/UR
MAM - UR/UR/UR
GMM - UR/UR/UR

QFM - UR/ANT/UR

Item II
Removal of Lictors and Interpreters

The information as given at the start of the Contio
is now incorrect. Several of the mentioned names have paid their
taxes according to the latest
released information. Untile the statisics are updated we cannot
vote using incorrect information.

AGG - UR/UR, ANT/UR



Article 4 :

Since the Senate is composed by twenty eight (28) senators, it
appears that nine (9) senators,
representing 32% of the senators, did not take part in the vote.
These senators are the following ones :

CFD - C. Flavius Diocletianus
MCI - Marcus Cassius Iulianus
LCSF - Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
DIPI - Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus
LSD - Lucius Sicinius Drusus
GSA - Gnaeus Salvius Astur
MCS - Manius Constantinus Serapio
PC - Patricia Cassia
ATMC - Appius Tullius Marcellus Cato


Article 5 :

The results of the vote of the Senate are the following :

# 1 - APPOINTMENT OF NEW PROPRAETOR OF PROVINCIA AMERICA
MEDIOCCIDENTALIS SUPERIOR

Passed UR : 19 votes
ANT : 0 votes
ABS : 0 votes


# 2 - REMOVAL OF INTERPRETERS AND LICTORS

Though the question was presented as a whole to the
senators, six (6) of them cast two different votes, concerning the
interpreters on one hand, and the lictors on the other.

From the moment that we consider these split votes as admissible,
which the presiding consul did, we have the following results :

2.1. Removal of interpreters (« approve the removal of the
following
Interpreters and Lictores »):

Passed UR : 16 votes
ANT : 1 vote
ABS : 2 votes


2.2. Removal of lictors (« approve the removal of the following
Interpreters and Lictores » ):

Passed UR : 11 votes
ANT : 4 votes
ABS : 4 votes




# 3 - PERMISSION TO USE THE NOVA ROMAN LOGOS

Passed UR : 18 votes
ANT : 0 votes
ABS : 1 vote



Article 6 :

The complexity of the question on the removal of interpreters and
lictors calls for some commentary.

As Consul Caesar said in his message below, « (..) there was a
misunderstand[ing] about the vote on this item. ». During the
debate, some senators argued that the non-taxpaying lictors could
only be dismissed by the assembly that originally designated them.

The reason put forward by Ill. Consul Caesar was article III.C of
lex Vedia de assidui et capiti censi (20th May 2003), which says
that « No member of the capiti censi may run for or hold office as
one of the ordinarii (including the apparitores), nor be appointed
to or hold office as provincial governor».

The first difficulty which appears is that neither lex Vedia, nor
any other law, specifies the way this article must be applied. This
text sets an interdiction, but does not say what to do if citizens
capite censi -i.e. who have not paid their taxes - run for or hold
office.

Consul Caesar has considered, with a not so a bad reason, that these
people should be dismissed. For it seems contrary to the basic roman
virtues that people who claim to represent Nova Roma do not, as
other citizens, set the example of contributing to the budget of our
Res publica.

Illustrus Caesar initially considered that the dismissal could be
carried out by the Senate.

Concerning the Interpreters, he was fully right, for the « simple »
interpreters whose office has been created by lex Cornelia de
linguis publicis as the « latinists », whose status has been
detailed by lex Arminia de fovenda lingua latina, are designated and
dismissed by the Senate.

The case of the lictors was more complicated. Some senators
underlined the fact that the lictors are designated by the comitia
curiata and cannot be dismissed by another constitutional power.

This argument sounds wise, concerning the *curiati* lictors,
specially if we recall that the constitution specifies, in its
article III.A., that « The comitia curiata (Assembly of Curiae)
shall be made up of thirty lictores curiati (lictors of the curia)
[..] and the collegium pontificum shall set the rules by which the
comitia curiata shall operate internally. ».

The problem here is that another article of the same constitution,
the article IV.A.9., places the lictors and the curiati lictors
among the apparitors : « Apparitores (Attendants). Collectively, the
apparitores shall not be considered magistrates, but rather shall be
appointed into various decuriae (corporations) to fulfill those
necessary functions as shall be assigned to them by law enacted by
one of the comitia. They shall include the lictores, lictores
curiati, scribae, and accensi. ».

And, we have seen that lex Vedia also concerns apparitors (see
above).


So how to solve this double contradiction : on one hand lictors are
members of one of the assemblies of Nova Roma ; on the other hand,
they are designated as ordinary non-magisterial officers. Second, as
members of an assembly they are not required to obey any rule
defined by a simple (non constitutional) law, nor are they required
to obey a law that has not been defined by the comitia curiata
itself ; at the same time, lex Vedia says that they must not occupy
their lictorial office if they do not pay the annual taxes ?

The Senate has touched upon the difficulty and Consul Caesar decided
(cf message below) that the vote would be « unofficial for lictores
inviting the Pontifex Maximus to find a solution as soon as
possible.».

What seems clear is that first the primacy of the constitution on
the law, then the fact that article III of this text must prevails
over the article IV.A.9 because the constitution sets an *assembly*
which is reputed to represent the People of Nova Roma, leading us to
conclude that *in law*, lictors are not subject to lex Vedia.


Beyond this interesting senatorial debate, we see therefore that we
will have to solve, one day or another some of the contradictions
which are included in our Constitution.

At last remains the « moral » question : is it normal that some of
the members of the comitia curiata do not pay taxes ? This Honorable
assembly is the only one which may answer this question, in
conscience.



Article 7 :

The appropriate magistrates of Nova Roma and their departments are
responsible, as far as each one is concerned, for executing this
edict,
which replaces the edict 58-18 published the 5th August 2005, and
which will be published in the Tabularium of Nova Roma.



Issued in Caen, city of the Viducasses, France,
this fifth day of August, 2005 C.E. (Nonas Sextiles 2758),
during the consulate of Fr. Apulus Caesar and Ga. Popillius Laenas




Extract of the consular message 4th August 18:04 rome time


(..)

# 1 - APPOINTMENT OF NEW PROPRAETOR OF PROVINCIA AMERICA
MEDIOCCIDENTALIS SUPERIOR
> Given the resignation of the Propraetor Q. Servilius Priscus
> Fidenas, Salvia Sempronia Graccha presents her candidacy for the
> Propraetorship of America Medioccidentalis Superior:
>
> <<Thank you for considering my candidacy for propraetrix of
Provincia
> America Medioccidentalis Superior. I have been working on behalf of
> Propraetor Q. Servilius Priscus Fidenas for some months now, first
> as
> scriba and then as legata, with the understanding that this was
> essentially
> an apprenticeship for the propraetorship. Now that he wishes to
> effect
> his retirement, I feel that I am reasonably well prepared to take
on
> the job. I hope that I will be able to contribute to the growth of
> the
> province.
> We will be having our first local meeting this Thursday. I
> am about
> one-third done with the provincial census work. I have been
> advising a
> very enthusiastic newbie concerning her name. I have plans to
> increase
> the level of active involvement of our cives and to increase the
> number
> of cives.
> I hope that you will consider these things when making your
> decision.
> If you would like further information, please don't hesitate to
> ask.>>

(..)

+ + + + +

# 2 - REMOVAL OF INTERPRETERS AND LICTORES
> The following Interpreters and Lictores are counted as members of
> the Cepite Censi. As ordered by the Lex Vedia de Assidui et Capiti
> Censi, they should be removed from their own Offices. However the
> Costitution defines them as no Magistrates. So I address this
matter
> and the decision to remove them to the body entitled to elect them,
> the Senatus.
> The Senatus is called to approve the removal of the following
> Interpreters and Lictores:
>
> - Titus Arminius Genialis
> - Marcus Cornelius Felix
> - Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> - Petrus Domitianus Artorinus Longinus
> - Lucius Fabius Metellus
> - Helena Galeria Aureliana
> - Marcus Martianus Gangalius
> - Lucius Sicinius Drusus

FAC - VTI ROGAS: working for a better law cohordinating the tax-
raising with the annual elections, I think teh law should be applied
and the following gentlemen removed from their own Offices.
GPL - VTI ROGAS
MOG - VTI ROGAS
MIP - VTI ROGAS
PM-TS - ABSTINEO
LAF - VTI ROGAS, follow the law.
ECF - VTI ROGAS
JSM - VTI ROGAS for interpreters and ANTIQvO for lictores
CFL - VTI ROGAS
MMTA - ABSTINEO: I abstain from this voter from a hesitatation
brought about by the determination of Senator Tiberia. She has
mentioned some aspects that I had not considered, and until they are
made clearer I will abstain on this matter.
TLF - With respect to the interpretes: VTI ROGAS - With respect to
the lictores of the comitia curiata: ABSTINEO
While I see nothing wrong with the Senatus giving its advice in this
matter--after all, that is what the Senatus does--Senatrix Minucia-
Tiberia is quite correct that this body does not have the authority
to dismiss lictores curiatae. That is, indeed, the purview of the
Collegium Pontificum.
LSA - VTI ROGAS
MAM - VTI ROGAS
AGG - Interpretes: VTI ROGAS - Lictores: ANTIQVO
LECA - Cincinnatus Augur: ANTIQVO to the dismissal of the Lictores.
As has been rightly stated that is the under the jurisdiction of the
Comitia Curiata presided over by the Pontifex Maximus and appointed
by the College Pontificum. "III. Comitia A. The comitia curiata
(Assembly of Curiae) shall be made up of thirty lictores curiati
(lictors of the curia), appointed to their position by the collegium
pontificum (college of pontiffs). It shall be called to order by the
Pontifex Maximus, and the collegium pontificum shall set the rules
by which the comitia curiata shall operate internally..."
We haven't addressed the issue of non tax paying Lictores. Who would
think that someone appointed to such an honorable and exclusive
comitia wouldn't support the republic of which it is a part? But
then, we've had many other things happen that make even less sense.
Cincinnatus Augur: VTI ROGAS, to the removal of delinquent
interpreters. Since they are appointed by the Senate we have a
perfect right to dismiss them.
QFM - ANTIQVO: The information as given at the start of the Contio
is now incorrect. Several of the mentioned names have paid their
taxes according to the latest
released information. Untile the statisics are updated we cannot
vote using incorrect information.
GEM - VTI ROGAS with respect to the Interpreters and ABSTINEO with
respect to the Lictores
GMM - VTI ROGAS
CFBQ - VTI ROGAS

It's quite clear that there was a misenderstood about the vote on
this item. It seems that the law about Assidui et Capite Censi seems
couldn't be applied to the Lictores which must to be judged by the
Conitia Curiata called by the Pontifex Maximus. For this reason I
divided the result of this item in two voices, one official for
interpreters and one un-official for Lictores inviting the Pontifex
Maximus to find a solution as soon as possible.
So, the Interpreters which are members of the Capite Censi at the
end of the current Senatus Consultum, are removed from their Office
with immediate effect.

(..)

+ + + + +

> # 3 - PERMISSION TO USE THE NOVA ROMAN LOGOS
> Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa ask to the Senatus the approval to use the
> official logos of Nova Roma for his new e-commerce. The following
is
> the official request:
>
> <<My name is Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa and I am officially requesting
> permission
> to use the 'SPQR and laurel wreath' logo design on
> crested/silk-screened
> apparell. The first products available will be t-shirts, baseball
> caps,
> sweatshirts, hoodies, and toques. If there is a demand, I will
> branch
> out
> into other apparell items. The logo would be used on the front of
> the
> product with 'novaroma.org' on the sleeves of the shirts and on the
> back of
> the caps and toques. Most likely, the shirts will retail for $US 15
> with
> the caps and toques at similar prices. The sweatshirts and hoodies
> will
> probably retail for about $US 35 or 40. The prices will depend on
> volume
> and suppliers. I have a supplier in the works and the products will
> be
> available in about 3 weeks after I have recieved permission from
the
> Senate
> to use the logo. If you have any questions about my proposal,
> please
> feel
> free to email me.
>
> Thank you for your time,
> Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa>>

FAC - VTI ROGAS: I remember to illustrus Agripps that the permission
by the Sneatus would be followed by the approval of the membership in
the Ordo Equester.
GPL - VTI ROGAS
MOG - VTI ROGAS
MIP - VTI ROGAS
PM-TS - VTI ROGAS
LAF - ABSTINEO, I was unable to follow the matter.
ECF - VTI ROGAS
JSM - VTI ROGAS
CFL - VTI ROGAS
MMTA - ABSTINEO: My reasoning here is because of a recent report of
several children being
severely burned (3rd degree burns over a large percentage of thier
body) by
t-shirts which were made of wholly or a large portion of synthetic
products.
When the T-shirts burned these products melted into the burned
areas, and caused
a signifiicant increase in the burn severity. Since I do not wish my
name or my
organizations linked with such dangerous practices in regard to
children, I will
abstain my vote until such time I I find out what kind of material
these
t-shirts are being made of.
TLF - VTI ROGAS
LSA - VTI ROGAS: I would hope that anyone authorized to sell items
under the
auspices of Nova Roma is required to attest to the basic safety of
what
they sell there. If this is not so, let us take steps to make it so.
MAM - VTI ROGAS
AGG - VTI ROGAS
LECA - VTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS
GEM - VTI ROGAS
GMM - VTI ROGAS
CFBQ - VTI ROGAS

(..)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37461 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: House of Ptolemy (offshoot of 'From boy to tyrant...or benefact
Salvete omnes

This question may be off topic, but does anyone else remember this: when Passion of the Christ was released, Mel Gibson said he would like to do a movie on Yehuda HaMakabi's revolt. Did I just imagine this or did anyone else hear something about it?

gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
G. Equitius Cato M. Ambrosio Falconi T. Octaviano Salvio quiritibusque
S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Falco, I think you'll enjoy it. Like I said, it's a little odd (I
mean, the God Thoth is the narrator!) buit very entertaining and
actually quite accurate, historically.

As far as the others of the Diadochi, the most famous besides the
Ptolemies were the Seleucids, whose authority included Palestine. The
revolt of the Jews against the last of them, Antiochus IV
"Epiphanies", gave rise to the heroic stories of the Maccabees and the
eventual control of Palestine by Rome.

In 167 B.C., Antiochus erected a statue of Zeus in the Temple in
Jerusalem and sacrificed a pig on the altar there --- the most
horrendous of abominations conceivable to the Jews. They revolted
under the leadership of the Maccabee (or Hasmonean) family, and were
victorious; the cleansing of the Temple and the lighting of the great
seven-branched candlestick in the Court of the Hebrews which remained
burning for eight days even though there was only oil sufficient for
one day is commemorated as the Festival of Lights, or Hanukkah.

In 143 B.C., after years of turmoil against the house of the
Seleucids, the Maccabees succeeded in gaining both political and
sacerdotal power in Palestine; although there was a great deal of
infighting amongst the heirs of the Maccabees, it was only the civil
war between two brothers, John Hyrcanus II and Aristobulus II, which
ended in the intervention by Rome and the conquering of Palestine by
Pompey in 63 B.C.

Valete bene,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "mfalco1" <mfalco1@y...> wrote:
> M. Ambrosius Falco T. Octavioni Salvio G. Equitio Catoni s.p.d.
>
> Salvete,
>
> Forgive my interjection, I saw your "suggested reading" Cato, and
> ordered the book. The post-Alexandrian world has been something of an
> interest of mine and I try to learn as much about the period as I
> can.
>
> > It always seemed to me that the Ptolemies were the most sucessful
> of
> > the Diadochi. What happened to the other sucessor kingdoms, like
> the
> > Selucids and Macedon itself (presumably Rome happened to them)?
>
> Indeed, the Ptolemaic Kingdom was the longest lasting of the
> satrapies of Alexander's conquest and I would daresay most
> successful. The Seleucids succumbed to both the Romans and Parthians
> in 67 bc, and the Antigonids in Greece also succumbed to the power of
> Rome in 106 bc. Cleopatra VII Philopator, did not die until I believe
> 30 bc ending the Ptolemaic line in Egypt.
> Valete Bene
> Falco
>
> T. Octavioni Salvio
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "t_octavius_salvius" <fin37@h...>
> wrote:
> > T. Octavius Salvius G. Equitio Catoni S.P.D.
> >
> > Salve Amice,
> >
> > > I haven't yet, but I did read an odd little book by Duncan Sprott
> > > entitled "the ptolemies"; it's a history of the Ptolemies written
> > from
> > > the viewpoint of the God Thoth. It's a little bizarre, but a
> > great read.
> >
> >
> > I'll have a look out for that! I think I'm catching Ptolemy-fever
> > (not to be confused with Malaria).
> >
> > It always seemed to me that the Ptolemies were the most sucessful
> of
> > the Diadochi. What happened to the other sucessor kingdoms, like
> the
> > Selucids and Macedon itself (presumably Rome happened to them)?
> >
> > vale
> >
> > T. Octavius Salvius




---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37462 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Rome-Total War question
Salvete omnes

I finally got some free time and started playing Rome - Total War. I just have a question that maybe some other players can answer. One member of the retinue of a city governor is the slave girl. Is this just wishful thinking on my part or does she really look like Jennifer Love Hewitt to anyone else?

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37463 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: House of Ptolemy (offshoot of 'From boy to tyrant...or benefact
Salve,



> This question may be off topic, but does anyone else remember this:
when Passion of the Christ was released, Mel Gibson said he would like
to do a movie on Yehuda HaMakabi's revolt. Did I just imagine this or
did anyone else hear something about it?


I heard the next film he's doing is about the Aztecs and the
Conquistadores. It's the same idea of doing the whole film in the
native language. I've not heard about that revolt one, although I'm
not close to any top Hollywood sources ;-)

vale

T. Octavius Salvius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37464 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: Re: House of Ptolemy (offshoot of 'From boy to tyrant...or benefact
Salvete Gai Vipsani et omnes,

Yes, he is apparently. I heard this about the same time The Passion
was released. There are numerous write ups on the net by here is a
short magazine article I found that gives the details:


Mel Gibson & the Maccabees
by Joe Katzman at March 27, 2004 08:17 PM

Apparently, Mel Gibson wants to make a movie about the Maccabees,
who gave us the holiday of Hannukah through their Braveheart-style
revolt against the Greek Selucid king Antiochus. Gideon's Blog notes
the intense irony here, and delivers a great synopsis of the key
players in Judea during Jesus' time. He concludes:

"So the irony of Gibson's film project is twofold. He made a film
about Jesus' death that, in the mind of many Jews, slandered the
Jewish High Priest with the crime of deicide. But ironically, this
High Priest was someone opposed by the ancestors of today's Jews,
the Pharisees. And now, to "make up" to the Jews, Gibson is
proposing to make a film that glorifies the Maccabees. Normally,
this would be a topic modern Jews would love, as Zionism has
rehabilitated the Maccabees from their traditional rabbinic
disparagement, though it's unlikely most Jews will appreciate the
gesture coming from Gibson. But ironically, these Maccabees whom
Gibson will celebrate are the ancestors of the same Caiphas who is
the villain of Gibson's Passion!"

All true. Also true: if he made a Braveheart-type movie about the
Maccabees, I'd go see it.

QLP

Nothing like more contraversy eh?
Well the bible had some pretty horrendous descriptions of this time;
especially when King Antiochus, while trying to Hellenize the Jewish
subjects, roasts a few of them alive in a giant frying pan for
refusing to eat pork like the Greeks. I am sure, like The Passion,
Mel won't disappoint as far as blood and guts go.

With regards to the, Conquest Of Mexico, I suggested to a few
Mexicans who work in their smaller industry that they should make a
great epic about the Conquest in the same level as Gladiator or
Braveheart. It is an interesting subject pretty well untouched
except for a little in " The Captain From Castille" with Tyrone
Power in the 50's. They said the industry there could not afford
such a big budget movie so like it or not, looks like it is up to
Hollywood and perhaps Mel Gibson again.

Regards,

QLP





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
<canadaoccidentalis@y...> wrote:
> Salvete omnes
>
> This question may be off topic, but does anyone else remember
this: when Passion of the Christ was released, Mel Gibson said he
would like to do a movie on Yehuda HaMakabi's revolt. Did I just
imagine this or did anyone else hear something about it?
>
> gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@y...> wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato M. Ambrosio Falconi T. Octaviano Salvio
quiritibusque
> S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> Falco, I think you'll enjoy it. Like I said, it's a little odd (I
> mean, the God Thoth is the narrator!) buit very entertaining and
> actually quite accurate, historically.
>
> As far as the others of the Diadochi, the most famous besides the
> Ptolemies were the Seleucids, whose authority included Palestine.
The
> revolt of the Jews against the last of them, Antiochus IV
> "Epiphanies", gave rise to the heroic stories of the Maccabees and
the
> eventual control of Palestine by Rome.
>
> In 167 B.C., Antiochus erected a statue of Zeus in the Temple in
> Jerusalem and sacrificed a pig on the altar there --- the most
> horrendous of abominations conceivable to the Jews. They revolted
> under the leadership of the Maccabee (or Hasmonean) family, and
were
> victorious; the cleansing of the Temple and the lighting of the
great
> seven-branched candlestick in the Court of the Hebrews which
remained
> burning for eight days even though there was only oil sufficient
for
> one day is commemorated as the Festival of Lights, or Hanukkah.
>
> In 143 B.C., after years of turmoil against the house of the
> Seleucids, the Maccabees succeeded in gaining both political and
> sacerdotal power in Palestine; although there was a great deal of
> infighting amongst the heirs of the Maccabees, it was only the
civil
> war between two brothers, John Hyrcanus II and Aristobulus II,
which
> ended in the intervention by Rome and the conquering of Palestine
by
> Pompey in 63 B.C.
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "mfalco1" <mfalco1@y...> wrote:
> > M. Ambrosius Falco T. Octavioni Salvio G. Equitio Catoni s.p.d.
> >
> > Salvete,
> >
> > Forgive my interjection, I saw your "suggested reading" Cato,
and
> > ordered the book. The post-Alexandrian world has been something
of an
> > interest of mine and I try to learn as much about the period as
I
> > can.
> >
> > > It always seemed to me that the Ptolemies were the most
sucessful
> > of
> > > the Diadochi. What happened to the other sucessor kingdoms,
like
> > the
> > > Selucids and Macedon itself (presumably Rome happened to them)?
> >
> > Indeed, the Ptolemaic Kingdom was the longest lasting of the
> > satrapies of Alexander's conquest and I would daresay most
> > successful. The Seleucids succumbed to both the Romans and
Parthians
> > in 67 bc, and the Antigonids in Greece also succumbed to the
power of
> > Rome in 106 bc. Cleopatra VII Philopator, did not die until I
believe
> > 30 bc ending the Ptolemaic line in Egypt.
> > Valete Bene
> > Falco
> >
> > T. Octavioni Salvio
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "t_octavius_salvius"
<fin37@h...>
> > wrote:
> > > T. Octavius Salvius G. Equitio Catoni S.P.D.
> > >
> > > Salve Amice,
> > >
> > > > I haven't yet, but I did read an odd little book by Duncan
Sprott
> > > > entitled "the ptolemies"; it's a history of the Ptolemies
written
> > > from
> > > > the viewpoint of the God Thoth. It's a little bizarre, but
a
> > > great read.
> > >
> > >
> > > I'll have a look out for that! I think I'm catching Ptolemy-
fever
> > > (not to be confused with Malaria).
> > >
> > > It always seemed to me that the Ptolemies were the most
sucessful
> > of
> > > the Diadochi. What happened to the other sucessor kingdoms,
like
> > the
> > > Selucids and Macedon itself (presumably Rome happened to them)?
> > >
> > > vale
> > >
> > > T. Octavius Salvius
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37465 From: James Mathews Date: 2005-08-30
Subject: "Roman Times Quarterly," "Pilum," and "Nova Britannia" Quarterlies
Ladies and Gentlemen,

I announce the 2005 second quarter's issue of the subject publications for your enjoyment. Please find these publications at:

http://www.livinghistoryengineer.com/roman/

Very Respectfully;

Marcus Audens, (Associate Editor, and Editor respectively)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37466 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2005-08-31
Subject: Re: From boy to tyrant...or benefactor?
G. Iulio Equitio Catoni SPD.

Salve, Cato.

I don't doubt that Cleopatra was a charming and accomplished. It's unlikely
that she would have survived at her father's and brother's courts if she
weren't. However, I think in both Caesar's and Antonius' case the motivation
to court her was primarily economic and political. By the time Caesar
installed Cleopatra just outside of Rome he was pursuing a number of
policies which were guaranteed to alienate the Roman aristocracy. I frankly
wonder whether it was simply a function of a man who had enjoyed nearly
miraculous success for so many years that he simply reached too far,
counting on his own skills to brush aside any opposition, certainly the
decision to pardon rather than execute out of hand his opponents in the
civil war was a blunder of that sort (and one which Augustus took to heart).
I think there is another factor involved in the siring of Caesarion. Royalty
was held to be divine in most of the Hellenistic East and most especially so
in Egypt. By marrying fathering Caesarion Casar was laying a direct claim to
divine status -- which combined with another divine cultus in the East, that
of the martial hero, gave him an extraordinary claim to authority over the
native peoples of the region. I'm equally inclined to believe that that was
a factor in Antonius' relationship with Cleopatra as well.

Egypt was an imperial province of an unusual sort, not the usual equestrian
province of the imperial period. The emperor held it as Pharoah as a
personal possession, not as a holding of the Roman state. This was both
because it kept vital economic resources uniquely under the emperor's
control and because it made Roman rule enormously more palatable to the
population since it acknowledged deeply held local tradition. The prefect of
the province was appointed by the emperor and was of the equestrian class
(although by the time of the military anarchy you occasionally see a prefect
from the Senatorial class who was a close relative of the emperor).

Vale.

Scaurus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37467 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-31
Subject: pridie Kal. Sept.
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Today is pridie Kalendas Septembris; the day is Comitialis.

"Hominem ad duas res, ut ait Aristoteles, ad intelligendum et ad
agendum, esse natum." (Man is born to two things, as Aristotle says:
to understand and to act) - Cicero, De finibus

"This determined language from the tribunes filled the patricians with
speechless indignation and amazement. It is stated that Appius
Claudius, a grandson of the old decemvir, moved by feelings of anger
and hatred more than by any hope of turning them from their purpose,
came forward and spoke to the following effect: "It would be nothing
new or surprising to me, Quirites, to hear once more the reproach that
has always been levelled against our family by revolutionary tribunes,
namely, that from the very beginning we have never regarded anything
in the State as more important than the honour and dignity of the
patricians, and that we have always been inimical to the interests of
the plebs. The former of these charges I do not deny. I acknowledge
that from the day when we were admitted into the State and into the
senate we have laboured most assiduously in order that the greatness
of those houses amongst which it was your will that we should be
numbered might be said in all truth to have been enhanced rather than
impaired. In reply to the second charge, I would go so far as to
assert, on my own behalf and on that of my ancestors, that neither as
individuals nor in our capacity as magistrates have we ever done
anything knowingly which was against the interests of the plebs,
unless any one should suppose that what is done on behalf of the State
as a whole is necessarily injurious to the plebs as though they were
living in another city; nor can any act or word of ours be truthfully
brought up as opposed to your real welfare, though some may have been
opposed to your wishes. Even if I did not belong to the Claudian house
and had no patrician blood in my veins, but more simply one of the
Quirites, knowing only that I was sprung from free-born parents and
was living in a free State - even then, could I keep silence when I
see that this L. Sextius, this C. Licinius, tribunes for life - good
heavens! - have reached such a pitch of impudence during the nine
years of their reign that they are refusing to allow you to vote as
you please in the elections and in the enacting of laws?

"'On one condition,' they say, 'you shall reappoint us tribunes for
the tenth time.' What is this but saying, 'What others seek we so
thoroughly despise that we will not accept it without a heavy
premium'? But what premium have we to pay that we may always have you
as tribunes of the plebs? 'That you adopt all our measures en bloc,
whether you agree with them or not, whether they are useful or the
reverse.' Now I ask you - you Tarquinian tribunes of the plebs - to
listen to me. Suppose that I, as a citizen, call out from the middle
of the Assembly, 'Allow us, with your kind permission, to choose out
of these proposed measures what we think beneficial for us and reject
the others.' 'No,' he says, 'you will not be allowed to do so. You
would pass the measure about usury and the one about the distribution
of land, for these concern you all; but you would not allow the City
of Rome to witness the portentous sight of L. Sextius and C. Licinius
as consuls, a prospect you regard with detestation and loathing.
Either accept all, or I propose none.' Just as if a man were to place
poison together with food before some one famished with hunger and bid
him either abstain from what would support his life or mix with it
what would bring death. If this were a free State, would not hundreds
of voices have exclaimed, 'Begone, with your tribuneships and
proposals!' What? If you do not bring in reforms which it is to the
people's advantage to adopt, is there no one else who will? If any
patrician, if even a Claudius - whom they detest still more -were to
say, 'Either accept all, or I propose none,' which of you, Quirites,
would tolerate it? Will you never have more regard for measures than
for men? Will you always listen with approving ears to everything
which your magistrate says and with hostile ears to whatever is said
by any of us?

"His language is utterly unbecoming a citizen of a free republic.
Well, and what sort of a proposal is it, in heaven's name, that they
are indignant with you for having rejected? One, Quirites, which quite
matches his language. 'I am proposing,' he says, 'that you shall not
be allowed to appoint whom you please as consuls.' What else does his
proposal mean? He is laying down the law that one consul at least
shall be elected from the plebs, and is depriving you of the power of
electing two patricians. If there were to-day a war with Etruria such
as when Porsena encamped on the Janiculum, or such as that in recent
times with the Gauls, when everything round us except the Capitol and
the Citadel were in the enemy's hands, and, in the press of such a
war, L. Sextius were standing for the consulship with M. Furius
Camillus and some other patrician, could you tolerate Sextius being
quite certain of election and Camillus in danger of defeat? Is this
what you call an equal distribution of honours, when it is lawful for
two plebeians to be made consuls, but not for two patricians; when one
must necessarily be taken from the plebs, while it is open to reject
every patrician? What is this comradeship, this equality of yours? Do
you count it little to come into a share of what you have had no share
in hitherto, unless whilst you are seeking to obtain the half you can
carry off the whole? He says, 'I am afraid if it is left open for two
patricians to be elected, you will never elect a plebeian.' What is
this but saying, 'Because you would not of your own will elect
unworthy persons, I will impose upon you the necessity of electing
them against your will'? What follows? That if only one plebeian is
standing with two patricians he has not to thank the people for his
election; he may say he was appointed by the law not by their vote." -
Livy, History of Rome 6.40


Caligula was born as Gaius Julius Caesar Germanicus on August 31, A.D.
12, at the resort of Antium (modern Anzio), the third of six children
born to Augustus's adopted grandson, Germanicus, and
Augustus's granddaughter, Agrippina the Elder. Germanicus was son to
Nero Claudius Drusus and Antonia Minor, and older brother to Claudius.
Agrippina was daughter to Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa and Julia Caesaris.
They had four other sons (Tiberius and Gaius Julius, who died young;
Nero, Drusus), and three daughters (Julia Livilla, Drusilla and
Agrippina the younger).

Gaius' life started out promisingly, as he was the son of extremely
famous parents. Germanicus was a grandson to Tiberius Nero of the gens
Claudia and Livia as well as an adoptive grandson of Roman Emperor
Caesar Augustus of the gens Julia. He was thus a prominent member of
the Julio-Claudian dynasty and was revered as the most beloved general
of the Roman Empire. Agrippina was herself a granddaughter of Caesar
Augustus and Scribonia. She was considered a model of the perfect
Roman woman. As a baby of just two or three, he accompanied his
parents on military campaigns in the north of Germania and became the
mascot of his father's army. The soldiers were amused whenever
Agrippina would put a miniature soldier costume on young Caligula, and
he was soon given his nickname "Caligula" (or Caligulae), meaning
"Little [Soldier's] boots" in Latin, after the small boots he wore as
part of his costume. He would end up hating this name, but he also
hated the name "Gaius". ("Caligula" is formed from the Latin word
caliga, meaning soldier's boot, and the diminutive infix "-ul".)


Today in Nigeria is the Eyo Masquerade. The Eyo is a masquerade that
comes out only on Lagos Island, and represents the spirit of an
ancestor. The Eyo festival may be held in honor of a chief or elder
of a ruling family or an oba who has died. It may also be held when a
new head of an Iga or a new oba is installed. With the advent of
Westernization, a political governor may also request the festival, to
display Lagosian tradition and pride to visiting dignitaries. Whoever
requests the Eyo must put down a considerable sum of money, for the
rituals that it will involve. The Eyo festival is usually held on a
Saturday.

Each Eyo comes out of an Iga "Palace" of a ruling family in the
morning and heads for the shrine, "Agodo". The Eyo is robed from head
to toe in white flowing sheets. The white flowing sheets consist of
an "agbada" the top robe, and the "aropale", the bottom wrap around.
No part of the human being carrying the eyo should be seen. The Eyo
also wears an "Akete", a hat that bears the colors and shield of the
Iga from which he comes. An Eyo may tie ribbons in his Iga's colors
to the Opambata (palm branch) that he carries. An Iga's Eyo may have
up to 50, 100 or more members. Each person carrying/robing as an Eyo
must pay a fee for the privilege. This fee is paid to the Iga -
ruling house whose colors and Akete that the Eyo wears. The Eyo, when
it encounters people, greets them with the phrase "E sunrunkunrun, we
ma jagbon die!" (Don't fear anything, have a taste of the palm tree),
and taps the individual on the shoulders with the opambata. When he
is given money, he will pray for the person and recite the praise song
of his Iga. The phrase "E sunrunkunrun, we ma jagbon die!" is in the
Ijebu dialect of Yoruba. Oral history tells us that the orisa of Eyo
was given as a gift to an Oba of Lagos as a wedding present when the
Oba married an Ijebu princess.

One of the taboos regarding the Eyo is that whoever carries the Eyo
must not cross a body of water such as the lagoon, or a river while
wearing the robes. Another taboo is that an Eyo may not sleep in the
robes after the festival is over. Imagine the spectacle of thousands
of white robed figures in colorful hats, flowing ribbons, men, women
and children milling about the streets singing and dancing. The Lagos
Eyo give good meaning to the words "festival" and "spectacle".

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy (http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/Livy/Livy06.html), Eyo
Masquerade
(http://www.yorubaalliance.org/Newsletter/newsletter5%2002.htm),
Caligula (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caligula)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37468 From: Tribune Albucius Date: 2005-08-31
Subject: Report of the Sen. session : some answers, back in office
Trb. Albucius Paulino, Athanasio, Calvo aliis omnibusque s.d.

S.V.B.E.E.V.


I have posted yesterday a modified version of my edict 58-18 of the
5th august reporting the last Senate session.

Here are the answers that I may bring to the interesting remarks
made by some citizens :

1/ The language : the previous version of my edict included
some mistakes. Some are big ones, others seem smaller. I give you
all my apologies for the first ones, committed on the night before
my driving to Rome. Concerning the second ones, I have well
understood that every of you have underlined the fact that this
point was not a real problem if the text is fully understandable. At
last, reading some of previous laws or magisterial edicts has
convinced me that the respect of « the language of Shakespeare », to
quote some of honorable citizens, was, even for English speaking
citizens, as variable as the use of latin at ancient roman times.


2/ On Consular Quaestor Paulinus's remarks (message ML 36903) :

a) « You also posted that the Senate was considering
removing "INTERPRETERS AND
« LICTORES" counted as members of the Capite Censi. It should be
noted that both Senator Lucius Cornelius « Sulla Felix and Lucius
Sicinius Drusus taxes are paid and are both Assidui. »

I have just taken in account the internal report of Consul Caesar,
quoted in my introduction (6th « in view »). I was not authorized to
contest such an information which enters the consular field of
competency. My task is here to report to the People, using this way
the informations given by the consular office.
If the presiding consul has been wrong in including Hon. Sulla and
Sicinius in the list of the citizens that he has suggested to
dismiss from office, he should have been warned before he convoked
the Senate, and by you, dear consular Quaestor ;-). I thus see here
two logical possibilities : either both Senators were assidui before
Consul Caesar convoked the Senate, and a problem thus occurred in
your consular office internal communication ; or they became assidui
after the convocation, and the decision of the Senate keeps its full
effect. Anyway, it is an internal consular question that you should
see with Consul Caesar.

b) « Senator Lucius Sicinius Drusus (..) has not been allowed to «
resume his place in the Senate by action of our two Censors because
of « last years controversy »

Both Consuls have just confirmed to me that Senator Drusus is a
member of the Senate, and that the list of the Senate contained in
NR web site is accurate.



3/ On Senatrix Strabo's remark (message ML 36912)

« Section B5 troubles me with respect to the situation at hand:
Quoting: "If the Senate has voted on an item of a confidential
nature, for example, the dismissal of a citizen, for the protection
of the citizen(s) in question the reporting Tribune should confer
with the Senate as to what details of the discussion/comments/voting
should be reported to the citizens." ».

I took here in consideration first the fact that the presiding
consul did not underlined me a possible difficulty with the point
voted by the Senate.
Furthermore and second, I have considered, like Consul Caesar, that
the fact that some officers do not pay their taxes cannot be, by
essence, « of a confidential nature » since paying the annual tax is
a legal condition to hold an office. At last, our citizens must be
dully informed each time one of us looses (or wins) its office, i.e.
the right of representing our Res publica.


4/ The fact that the report would not be understandable

I have read this criticism in Caius Modius Athanasius and Q. Cassius
Calvus's messages, which think that the report « needs to be
simpler ». This observation seems to be supported by 3
considerations :

a) The introduction

« There is no need for paragraph after paragraph of "in
light of this and in light of that" in order to explain what is self
explanitory (..) it's the format that is confusing on top of all the
unneccessary 5 articles of legal introductory » (Magister
Aranearius Q. Cassius Calvus)

I know that, for some of you, these « introductory » lines may seem
unuseful. In my view, there are useful for every citizen or
magistrate who may thus see on which ground I take my edict, here on
the publication of the senate session results. For example, the fact
that I quote the Consul message let you all understand that I take
my informations from this message with no power of judgment on the
informations given by it. This paragraph has, thus, sometimes, a
great importance.

Concerning the style « in view of.. », I thank you trusting me that
this style is, in my culture, juridically correct. I am also
convinced that such formal processes, identifying each of the step
of the magistrate's reasoning, help citizens and magistrates have a
clear information on the decision, and thus law be much better
respected by all. This writing is not contrary to the laws of Nova
Roma and seems understandable by all good willing citizen. If some
cives had still some understanding difficulties, they could
replace « in view of » by « taking in consideration.. » or... write
me privately, so that I give them new informations if necessary.


b) The contents itself

Whatever one might think, the more the session of the senate is long
and complex, the more the report is complex.

I think that the difficulty that Caius Modius Athanasius has lived
may be located in the fact that the votes of the senators are given
in a sole line (ex. UR/ABS/UR), instead of having each item
presented in a specific article.

On this point, I am not opposed to come back to this presentation
next time.

On the matter, the difference is small. In case of reading
difficulty, I suggest you to copy the text of the edict in Word and
to print it : it makes the reading far easier.


c) « the commentary must be clear within the context of the report
to be that of the reporting Tribune. » (Calvus)

It is. A specific article is provided for this commentary.



5/ On others Calvus's observations


a) « I can't make either heads nor tails of it for the
purposes of posting in the Tabularium under the subsection reserved
for the meetings of the Senate. »

The magister aranearius has to adapt the tools that he/she
creates to the life of the Res publica and to the decisions of its
assemblies and magistrates. Not the contrary.

I am however open to every request from the Magister aranearius that
would be made directly, from a magistrate to another, not via the
forum : our main list is the place for democracy, debates and
communication, not for daily government.



b) « Technically what was issued is >>>>not<<<< even a Senatorial
Report. It is an Edict. »

Unless Hon. Calvus has reacted as a citizen - but he seemed
have not, for I see a « magister aranearius » in the signing at the
bottom of the messages, I have to say my surprise reading such a
jugment from a magister aranearius.

I do not want to recall here that such a magister, according Lex
Equitia de vigintisexviris, « shall be responsible for the design,
maintenance, and any alteration of the official web site(s)
sponsored by the State. ». I do not find in these provisions the
power of inferring in the way a tribunus plebis fulfill her/his
office.

Just to stay in a pedagogical field, dear Calvus, I shall remind
that the edict is just the formal way a magistrate uses to make an
act. If a governor designs an accensus, he/she should make this
designation public through an edict ; if he dismisses an officer,
idem ; if her/she organizes her/his province, idem, etc..
Even if a tribune makes a report, this report should be issued
through an edict. Why ? Because this formal way has both
characteristics : to create some compulsary effects ; to be
published so that the magisterial act could be juridically attacked.
So we must not confound the edict - the legal envelop - and the
contents : reporting what the Senate has said and decided.

Generally speaking, if you have, dear Magister, too much work, let
us all know it and try to find some help in your hard office.


6/ On the use of templates, such as Aventina's one

Diana Octavia Aventina has considered that « It's a shame that they
[the tribunes] don't use [the template that she has communicated to
the tribunate]. » (message ML 36925, then 36954 and 36955).

Do not worry, dear Aventina, we tribunes do use your « Tribunes's
handbook ». I have personnally included it in the Tribunate files at
the beginning of this year and still refer to it regularly, as other
tribunes do. However, you should imagine, as wise as you are, that
the daily life of a well occupied tribune leaves a very tiny place
for regular consulting of previous and illustrious magistrates : we
have still not much time to coordinate we five ! So, even we do not
ask you for information, you are still, with your handsbook, by our
side. Is it not a great thing, indeed ?

So please do not forget two points : first that life goes on, and we
are all to improve the tools that our wise predecessors have left
us. In this view, some of year 2758 tribunes edicts might be added
to your Handbook to carry on improving it, for your templates have
not provided all situations ; the second point is on how we write in
the ML. On this last point, I think that your « it's a shame «
should not be read through its worst sense (« honte » in French),
should it ?


7/ On various things

I have read at last different considerations, which do not seem to
have a precise and direct relation with the question of the senate
session reporting : too much technocracy, too many laws, too much
talk, and the asking by Hon. Athanasius to my colleague Maior to «
take your job seriously » (message ML 36955).

I will not react on the three first considerations : we may all of
us agree with it, because these judgments are as good as they are
general ones. Bringing solutions to these deep questions would ask
us more common work, that is not in direct relation with our small
senate reporting question.

On your suggestion, dear Athanasius, to Tribune Maior to « (..) take
[her] job seriously and heed the counsel of the people instead of
sitting perched on your ego with blinders on.», I think, dear
Athanasius, that your reproach is not justified at all in this
context.

Your honor of civis romanus and Pontifex should incite you to
apologize for this unfair judgment : first, I am not sure that you
may speak, in this circumstance, on behalf of the whole People of
Nova Roma ; second, here, Tribune Maior has acted with virtue and
moderation. I do not see at last any form of «ego » in the fact that
she has taken in charge, while I was in the conventus Romae, a part
of my charge, including the discussion she had with you. At he
contrary. So thanks to you in advance, for your understanding and
the kind words that you could send to Hon. Hortensia Maior, dear
Athanasius. :-)


Valete omnes,


P. Memmius Albucius
Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37469 From: AthanasiosofSpfd@aol.com Date: 2005-08-31
Subject: Re: Report of the Sen. session : some answers, back in office
Tribune:

"dear Calvus" has resigned from Nova Roma.

Additionally, your "edicts" are still far too much. If you wish to continue
reporting on the senate in this fashion they continue to do so. However, I
cherish the idea that the citizens of Nova Roma have only a few more months
to have to sort through your legalistic approach.

C. Fabius Buteo Modianus

PS you should be well aware of my adoption at this point.

In a message dated 8/31/2005 1:52:26 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
albucius_aoe@... writes:

Generally speaking, if you have, dear Magister, too much work, let
us all know it and try to find some help in your hard office.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37470 From: Tribune Albucius Date: 2005-08-31
Subject: Re: Report of the Sen. session : some answers, back in office
P. Memmius Albucius Athanasio s.d.

S.V.G.E.R.

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, you wrote:

> Tribune: "dear Calvus" has resigned from Nova Roma.

I have just learned this decision today. I regret it, beyond the
single point dealt in our discussion, for I personnally appreciate
his work as a magister aranearius.


> Additionally, your "edicts" are still far too much. If you wish
>to continue reporting on the senate in this fashion they continue
>to do so. However, I cherish the idea that the citizens of Nova
>Roma have only a few more months to have to sort through your
>legalistic approach.

Do not be that pessimistic ! Next time, one of my colleagues
tribunes will report, and they may be not as "legalistic" as me. ;-)

Vale,

P. Memmius Albucius
Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37471 From: David Coleman Date: 2005-08-31
Subject: NR Religion Inc as Church?
Ave!

I have a question, is the Nova Roman Religion setup as an actual
church/temple anywhere? Such as having priests that are fully
authorized to perform ceremonies such as weddings, that would be
recognized legally by the country it was performed in (such as
performing a legal marriage in the USA as a Nova Roman priest).

If not, has there been any plans to do so? I think it would be a
great step to making the religion a viable alternative for the
citizens of Nova Roma.

Also, would the foreign religions be included in such an
incorporation? Or would each one have to be set up as as their own
entity for legal purposes? Or how would that work? Say if someone
wanted to set up a modern day Church of Mithras for example, would
it be headed as a member of Nova Roma, or as its own seperate
church? And if someone wanted to do that with one of the foreign
religions, what would he have to do, with regards to Nova Roma, to
get permission to do that? Say if I wanted to open the above
mentioned Church, would I have to get offical approval from the
Senate?

Marcus Artorius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37472 From: David Coleman Date: 2005-08-31
Subject: How to find local citizens?
Ave!

I've recently settled in the Southern part of the California
Provincia, and I would love to be able to find other citizens in this
area, but unfortunately, the website of Nova Roma doesn't list what
part or city a citizen is in within the province.

So, without emailing some 160+ members, how can I find what members
are in my area?

Marcus Artorius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37473 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-08-31
Subject: Re: NR Religion Inc as Church?
G. Equitius Cato Marco Arturio S.P.D.

Salve Marcus Artorius.

I do not think the religio has been set up (at least within Nova Roma
or under her auspices) as a legal church in the U.S. I do know that
in New York at least you must have something like 10 members willing
to sign an affidavit swearing that they are, indeed, members of the
church, accompanied by incorporation papers, a charter, etc. ---
basically an entirely seperate legal entity.

I would also imagine that the College of Pontiffs would be the only
body authorized under the Constitution and laws of the Republic to
create such an entity *within* Nova Roma.

Vale bene,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "David Coleman" <stardragon1@m...>
wrote:
> Ave!
>
> I have a question, is the Nova Roman Religion setup as an actual
> church/temple anywhere? Such as having priests that are fully
> authorized to perform ceremonies such as weddings, that would be
> recognized legally by the country it was performed in (such as
> performing a legal marriage in the USA as a Nova Roman priest).
>
> If not, has there been any plans to do so? I think it would be a
> great step to making the religion a viable alternative for the
> citizens of Nova Roma.
>
> Also, would the foreign religions be included in such an
> incorporation? Or would each one have to be set up as as their own
> entity for legal purposes? Or how would that work? Say if someone
> wanted to set up a modern day Church of Mithras for example, would
> it be headed as a member of Nova Roma, or as its own seperate
> church? And if someone wanted to do that with one of the foreign
> religions, what would he have to do, with regards to Nova Roma, to
> get permission to do that? Say if I wanted to open the above
> mentioned Church, would I have to get offical approval from the
> Senate?
>
> Marcus Artorius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37474 From: Maior Date: 2005-08-31
Subject: Re: NR Religion Inc as Church?
M. Hortensia Marco Arturo spd;
Salve; yes that certainly is within the province of the CP, to
get an idea of what it might look like I suggest you visit
the "Temple of the Religio Romana" which is indeed an offically
recognized 'church' in California and was set up with the help of
former augur Marcus Horatius Piscinus and Pontifex Graecus. I would
imagine that under such a rubric you would have different priests
and priestesses for the various cults, no reason to create a new
org. optime vale,
Marca Hortensia Maior
>
> I would also imagine that the College of Pontiffs would be the only
> body authorized under the Constitution and laws of the Republic to
> create such an entity *within* Nova Roma.
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Cato
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "David Coleman"
<stardragon1@m...>
> wrote:
> > Ave!
> >
> > I have a question, is the Nova Roman Religion setup as an actual
> > church/temple anywhere? Such as having priests that are fully
> > authorized to perform ceremonies such as weddings, that would be
> > recognized legally by the country it was performed in (such as
> > performing a legal marriage in the USA as a Nova Roman priest).
> >
> > If not, has there been any plans to do so? I think it would be a
> > great step to making the religion a viable alternative for the
> > citizens of Nova Roma.
> >
> > Also, would the foreign religions be included in such an
> > incorporation? Or would each one have to be set up as as their
own
> > entity for legal purposes? Or how would that work? Say if
someone
> > wanted to set up a modern day Church of Mithras for example,
would
> > it be headed as a member of Nova Roma, or as its own seperate
> > church? And if someone wanted to do that with one of the foreign
> > religions, what would he have to do, with regards to Nova Roma,
to
> > get permission to do that? Say if I wanted to open the above
> > mentioned Church, would I have to get offical approval from the
> > Senate?
> >
> > Marcus Artorius