Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Sept 9-18, 2005

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37651 From: David Kling Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37652 From: FAC Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: Good News
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37653 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Back again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37654 From: Lucius Iulius Auspex Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: ROMA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37655 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37656 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37657 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37658 From: Gregory Titus Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: Anniversary Of The Teutoburg Disaster
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37659 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Battle of the Teutoburg Forest
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37660 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: SOMETHING MORE ABOUT TEUTOBURG FOREST BATTLE...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37661 From: David Kling Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37662 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: SOMETHING MORE ABOUT TEUTOBURG FOREST BATTLE...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37663 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: EMPIRES AND HISTORY
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37664 From: Céline Chapamn Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: Good News
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37665 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37666 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37667 From: David Kling Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37668 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37669 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Re: SOMETHING MORE ABOUT TEUTOBURG FOREST BATTLE...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37670 From: c_fabia_livia@yahoo.co.uk Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Ludi Romani theatrical quiz (6)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37671 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37672 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37673 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37674 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Sept.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37675 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Re: The Pontificate (was: ... on Katrina?)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37676 From: c_fabia_livia@yahoo.co.uk Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Picture quiz - technical hitch
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37677 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Magna Mater Project site?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37678 From: eve_merrickwilliams Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Citizenship exam
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37679 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Re: Citizenship exam
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37680 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: SOMETHING MORE ABOUT TEUTOBURG FOREST BATTLE...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37681 From: c_fabia_livia@yahoo.co.uk Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Ludi Romani theatre quiz (7)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37682 From: c_fabia_livia@yahoo.co.uk Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Ludi Romani picture quiz (5)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37683 From: Gaius Aemilius Papinianus Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: SOMETHING MORE ABOUT TEUTOBURG FOREST BATTLE...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37684 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Fw: [Explorator] explorator 8.20
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37685 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: the Legions are Lost
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37686 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: German nationhood and Arminius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37687 From: Lucius Iulius Auspex Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: SOMETHING MORE ABOUT TEUTOBURG FOREST BATTLE...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37688 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: German nationhood and Arminius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37690 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: a.d. III Id. Sept.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37691 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Does anyone know where is Senator C. Marius Merullus?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37692 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: the Legions are Lost
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37693 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: SOMETHING MORE ABOUT TEUTOBURG FOREST BATTLE...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37694 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: a.d. III Id. Sept.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37695 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: SOMETHING MORE ABOUT TEUTOBURG FOREST BATTLE...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37696 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: the Legions are Lost
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37697 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: Does anyone know where is Senator C. Marius Merullus?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37698 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: Magna Mater Project site?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37699 From: Gaius Marius Merullus Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: Does anyone know where is Senator C. Marius Merullus?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37700 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: carmen Romanum Arminio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37701 From: luciusserviliusprimus Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37702 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: Posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37703 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: prid. Id. Sept.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37704 From: Marcus Quirinus Sulla Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: About Teutoburg forest battle
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37705 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: LUDI: An exercise in spontaneous play-writing
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37706 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: LUDI Play: Part One
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37707 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: LUDI Play: Part Two
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37708 From: C. Fabia Livia Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: Ludi Romani theatrical quiz (8)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37709 From: C. Fabia Livia Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: Ludi Romani picture quiz (5)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37710 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: LUDI Play: Part Three
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37711 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37712 From: os390account Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: LUDI Play: Part Four
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37713 From: Maior Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37714 From: David Kling Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37715 From: C. Fabia Livia Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Ludi Romani theatrical quiz (9)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37716 From: C. Fabia Livia Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Ludi Romani picture quiz (6)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37717 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: EYES ON THE SKIES - II
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37718 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Id. Sept.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37719 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: LUDI Play: Part Five
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37720 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37721 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37722 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37723 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Re: Ludi Romani picture quiz (6)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37724 From: Judy Ridgley Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37725 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37726 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37727 From: Lucius Servilius Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: Question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37728 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: Re: Question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37730 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: post. Id. Sept.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37731 From: c_fabia_livia@yahoo.co.uk Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: Ludi Romani theatrical quiz (10)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37732 From: c_fabia_livia@yahoo.co.uk Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: Ludi Romani picture quiz (8)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37733 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37734 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: Re: Rome Mini-series
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37735 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: Re: Rome Mini-series
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37736 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: Re: Lex de provocatione vote results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37737 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: Re: Rome Mini-series
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37738 From: Doris Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: The Imperial Eagles Need Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37739 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: a.d. XVII Kal. Oct.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37740 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Imperial Eagles Need Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37741 From: c_fabia_livia@yahoo.co.uk Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Ludi Romani theatrical quiz (11)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37742 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37743 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: Rome Mini-series
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37744 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: Lex de provocatione vote results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37745 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Edictum Censoris CFQ XXXVIII de Approbationibus (Censorial Edict f
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37746 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37747 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37748 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37749 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37750 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37751 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37752 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37753 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37754 From: Maior Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37755 From: Lucius Servilius Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37756 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: a.d. XVI Kal. Oct.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37757 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37758 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: Questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37759 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: Lex de provocatione vote results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37760 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37761 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: T. Octavio de pontificibus antiquis (WAS: The Pontificate)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37762 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37763 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37764 From: Tribune Albucius Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: Lex de provocatione vote results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37765 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: Lex de provocatione vote results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37766 From: Maior Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37767 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37768 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37769 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37770 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37771 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37772 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37773 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37774 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37775 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37776 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: a.d. XVI Kal. Oct.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37777 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37778 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37779 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37780 From: Maior Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37781 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37782 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37783 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37784 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate-An Opinion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37785 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate-An Opinion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37786 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: LUDI CIRCENSES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37787 From: RANDALL HERRERA RIOS Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: My registration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37788 From: coincollectors1 Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Nova Roma Coins
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37789 From: Jose Damian Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: My registration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37790 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: My registration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37791 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37792 From: Ursula Numeria Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37793 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37794 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37795 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37796 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37797 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: WSPQR radio 753
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37798 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37799 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37800 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Roman Bingo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37801 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Forget Roman Bingo site
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37802 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37803 From: Maior Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: WSPQR radio 753
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37804 From: M. Gladius Agricola Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37805 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37806 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Enthusiast uses Google to reveal Roman ruins
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37807 From: John Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Romanesque-ish -like Coins?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37808 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: a.d. XV Kal. Oct.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37809 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37810 From: M. Gladius Agricola Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Romanesque-ish -like Coins?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37811 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate-An Opinion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37812 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37813 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37814 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: NR Coinage / NR Wedding Ceremonies (Duties of a Pontifex?) /
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37815 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Romanesque-ish -like Coins?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37816 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37817 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Doing Another's Job
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37818 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Doing Another's Job
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37819 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: NR Coinage
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37820 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37821 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Doing Another's Job
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37822 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Doing Another's Job
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37823 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Doing Another's Job
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37824 From: M. Gladius Agricola Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: NR Coinage
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37825 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37826 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37827 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Doing Another's Job
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37828 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: NR Coinage / NR Wedding Ceremonies (Duties of a Pontifex?) /



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37651 From: David Kling Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Salvete;
I have issued my concern for the survivors of Katrina, and my concern for a
citizen of Nova Roma who I knew was from the area -- L. Modia Lupa (our
Vestal), whom we have found out is safe.
I do not have an official statement on Katrina, nor upon what has happened
to New Orleans. As a person, I can speculate philosophically that I believe
the Gods of Rome are ambivalant about the place. Why should they care? The
people of New Orleans do not make sacrifice to the Gods of Rome, and they do
not honor them. The magistrates of the city do not make regular offerings,
and New Orleans has no Collegium Pontificum of its own. So why should the
Gods of Rome care?
L. Modia Lupa believes in the Gods. She was in New Orleans. She made it out
successfully. Perhaps they have blessed her, by assisting her departure from
the city.
I DO NOT believe the Gods willed anything to happen. In the sense of being
malicious. However, I don't believe they concern themselves -- that is in
giving blessings -- with people and places who do not honor them.
So while I follow the disaster of Katrina on a daily basis, and am very
saddened by what has happened. As a pontifex I do not see anything that
would be of a concern. AS A PONTIFEX I make offerings to the Gods for the
CITIZENS of Nova Roma -- not the citizens of the United States. There are
some citizens in the gulf area, then I pray for them in my capacity as a
priest of Nova Roma. As a person, outside of my duties as a priest in Nova
Roma, I have prayed for the people afflicted by this most horrible tragedy.
Hope what I am explaining makes sense. I also hope it doesn't make me sound
like a horrible person. I am very compassionate about what has happened
after the onslaught of Katrina. I follow the disaster closely, and my heart
goes out to the people. But in my capacity as a priest of Nova Roma, I am
concerned with Nova Romans; their success, safety, and well being. But my
official offerings -- as a pontifex and flamen --- to the Gods are for
citizens of Nova Roma.
Valete;
C. Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 9/9/05, G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana <silvanatextrix@...> wrote:
>
> G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana omnes SPD.
>
> So very much has happened in the short time I was away . . .
>
> I applaud the magistrates who suggested and supported NR
> providing whatever financial aid we can, to our cives in
> the area affected by Katrina, and Consul F. Apulus Caesar
> for his prompt response. (Messages 37618, 37619, 37626)
>
> To Marcus Flavius Fides (Message 37621). . . perhaps this kind
> of real-world activity will inspire a few more people to pony up
> their taxes in the interests of helping their fellows, for as
> Marcus Aurelius says in his Mediations (Chapter VI, xxx: . . .
> " There is only one fruit of this terrene life, a pious disposition
> and social acts."
>
> Many thanks to the Propraetor Pannoniae for his Roman prayer
> for the victims of Katrina (Message 37638). It is one of the
> tenets of NR that the Religio is part of Nova Roman life, and
> this is a beautiful, poignant example.
>
> As a dedicated Nova Roman, Propraetor Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
> has a list of titles and duties. However, I did not notice the
> title of "Pontifex" among them.
>
> Since religious belief in all its forms has often given comfort,
> hope and strength to people in time of need, and because I have
> found great comfort in RR myself, I have scanned the messages
> since Katrina, looking for the official presence of the Pontificate
> on the disaster in the USA.
>
> I have hoped for some reflections, some guidance, some suggestions
> for rituals anchored in the Religio. More specifically, and more
> challenging, it would be helpful to me (and probably others of
> the RR) to see some reflections on the roles of the Deities, and
> the philosophical questions raised by the disaster from a RR
> perspective. Applied Religio Romana, as it were. A perfect
> example of a "teachable moment".
>
> If there are such messages on the list and I have missed them,
> I apologize . . . I will scan again. If what I suggest is an
> inappropriate role for the Pontificate within the context of NR,
> I stand corrected.
>
> Valete bene in pace Deorum.
>
> G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37652 From: FAC Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: Good News
salve Octavius Verus,
congratulations and welcome in Nova Roma!
Enjoy it and please contact me for any question.

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Senior Consul

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Sextus Octavius
<octaviusverus@y...> wrote:
> Salvete Omines,
>
> I would like to annouce that I have recently taken and
> passed the citizenship test.
>
> Valete,
> S. Octavius Verus
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
> http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37653 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Back again
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

Just a quick note to say that Livia and I are back
from our wonderful visit to provincia Thule (on which
I see Saturninus has already given you a full
report!), but we are still both rather busy and I, at
least, haven't yet managed to catch up on everything.

I haven't caught up on this list yet, but I can guess
what one of the main topics must have been, and let me
offer my deep sympathy to everyone affected by storms,
floods, and hurricanes this turbulent summer. This
applies especially, of course, to the residents of New
Orleans, but also to everyone in North America who has
been adversely affected by the knock-on effects of the
hurricane, as well as those in central Europe whose
homes were flooded earlier in August, those in
southern France who have been affected by floods in
the last few days, and those in Japan who were hit by
the August taifun.

I shall be catching up with this and other lists, and
with my private e-mail, over the next few days.





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37654 From: Lucius Iulius Auspex Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: ROMA
Saluete

Lucius Iulius Auspex omnibus salutem dicit

I just wanted to be thought-provoking. Forgive me some excesses, if any, of my bacchic inebriation of yesterday.

I really like this Republic; I guess she´s one of the most charming cyberplaces, among mortals and immortals.

Di vobiscum ex meo corde aueo

Lucius Iulius Auspex

Lucius Iulius Auspex <lucius_auspex@...> wrote:
Auete omnes

Have you, roman citizens, ever thought of abolishing some temporal and spiritual barriers by changing the name of Nova Roma to merely Roma:

Not the old
Not the new
Simply the eternal

Reflect about the jewish people: they passed though several periods of being forced to slavery, which can be equated to psychological anihilation, but when they recovered their cultural strenght, those who were in the power never called their people the new jews. Besides that, I think not even orthodox jews dress in clothes with a 2000 years design. If roman cultural identity was anihilated somewhere in time and is to be restored, should it be called New, like a sort of dernier crit, a vanishing fashion?

Valete quam optime

Lucius Iulius Auspex



---------------------------------
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire Roman empire coin

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------




---------------------------------
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37655 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
A. Ambrosius Celetrus G.A.F. Silvanae s.p.d.

"G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana" wrote:

>
> I have hoped for some reflections, some guidance, some suggestions
> for rituals anchored in the Religio. More specifically, and more
> challenging, it would be helpful to me (and probably others of
> the RR) to see some reflections on the roles of the Deities, and
> the philosophical questions raised by the disaster from a RR
> perspective. Applied Religio Romana, as it were. A perfect
> example of a "teachable moment".

>
> If there are such messages on the list and I have missed them,
> I apologize . . . I will scan again.

Salve Silvana,

And you will scan in vein, on either this or the Religio list.

We are in the midst of the Ludi Romani, offered in honor of Iuppiter
Optimus Maximus. Did ANY member of the CP offer public prayers to let
"The Best and Greatest" know these games were truly offered with honor
and respect, and not just as a chance to play quiz games, and gut
cyber-gladiators?

The answer is no. Yet in his answer to you, Buteo Modianus has the nerve
to write:

"AS A PONTIFEX I make offerings to the Gods for the CITIZENS of Nova
Roma -- not the citizens of the United States," and "in my capacity as a
priest of Nova Roma, I am concerned with Nova Romans; their success,
safety, and well being. But my official offerings -- as a pontifex and
flamen --- to the Gods are for citizens of Nova Roma."

What offerings? What prayers? On the Ides of last month, Buteo, who is
also flamen Pomonalis, in answer to similar criticism from me wrote, "I
attempt to honor Pomona the best I can, and as often as I can in a
public venue." That day was also the Vertumnalia, and thus also a day
for Dea Pomona by association. Did the flamen Pomonalis "attempt to
honor" Her, in any way whatsoever, that day? The answer is no.

Buteo Modianus, and the rest of the Collegium Pontificum, will write
reams about why there can be no women pontifices, on appropiate sources
for ritual (to be studied but never used), on name changes, and how they
should be addressed.

But will they stir their fingers to offer public prayers for one of NR's
host countries, or even those public prayers it is their vowed duty to
offer on behalf of Nova Roma as the sacral year unfolds? The anser is
no. Time and time agian, we have seen the answer is no.

As alluded about, there is a discussion going on on the Religio list
about forms of address for our silent (silent with respect to their
duties, that is) pontiffs. Perhaps our Latinists can provide the correct
equivalents for poseurs, charlatans and mountebanks.

Vale bene,
Amborius Celetrus




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37656 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Gn. Lentulus Aureliae et G. Buteoni Pontifici, viro amplissimo, sal.

"G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana" wrote:

>>>Many thanks to the Propraetor Pannoniae for his Roman prayer
for the victims of Katrina (Message 37638). It is one of the
tenets of NR that the Religio is part of Nova Roman life, and
this is a beautiful, poignant example.
As a dedicated Nova Roman, Propraetor Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
has a list of titles and duties. However, I did not notice the
title of "Pontifex" among them.<<<

Thank you, Aurelia Falconis, for your honesting words. My prayer was only an act of a private citizen (and propraetor) and I have to apprrove of the opinion of G. Fabius Modianus Pontifex -- however it is also true that the official Roman religion sometimes made sacrifices for kings or prominent personalities of other peoples and their countries -- if the climate of opinion of the Romans liked that.

Ceterum, I am devoted practicer of the Roman religion -- but the only one year spent in Nova Roma is too slight to run for so high religious offices.

Vale tu et omnes tui quam optime!


Cnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
Accensus Consulis Fr. Apuli Caesaris
Scriba Aedilis Curulis L. Iuli Sullae
Scriba Interpres Linguae Latinae Senior Tulliae Scholasticae
Scriba Magistri Araneari Iunior Q. Cassi Calvi

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37657 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
In a message dated 9/9/2005 1:39:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
silvanatextrix@... writes:
I have hoped for some reflections, some guidance, some suggestions
for rituals anchored in the Religio. More specifically, and more
challenging, it would be helpful to me (and probably others of
the RR) to see some reflections on the roles of the Deities, and
the philosophical questions raised by the disaster from a RR
perspective. Applied Religio Romana, as it were. A perfect
example of a "teachable moment".
Several comments. First by saying this was "Neptune's Wrath" as some people
have commented, misses the point. The hurricane was predicted, the results
assessed
the probable outcome discussed two years ago!

Should the people of New Orleans, knowing this, been sacrificing to Neptune
for survival knowing this? Perhaps, but man could have avoided this easily.
One notices that Old New Orleans circa 17-18 cent, survived reasonably intact.
That is because it was built in anticipation of storms. The area that was
destroyed
and still covered never should have been built up unless the levees were
maintained and strengthened. They weren't. The current gov. is fighting a war,
and monies earmarked for levee upgrades went to that.

When the levees were not upgraded, the media took notice. Many articles were
published
talking about possible disaster. However, the condition to cause disaster
had to happen perfectly, and the odds were long against it. Their luck ran out.
Fortuna is fickle.
So man brought this on himself. Not the Gods.

Remember, our Vestal who was in New Orleans did get out when so many died.
That was good news for Nova Roma. And perhaps proof of the Gods favor.

Q. Fabius Maximus
Pontifice


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37658 From: Gregory Titus Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: Anniversary Of The Teutoburg Disaster
That it did Quintus,

The Battle of Teutoburg Forest took place
on this exact date in the year 9AD. After hear of the
loss of his legions, it said that Augustus banged his
head againt the wall and stated the ever remembered
phrase,"Quintili Vare, legiones redde!" ('Quintilius
Varus, give me back my legions!').

I thin kI would have the same thing myself.

--- "Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)"
<mjk@...> wrote:

> Salvete omnes,
>
> Some think that this disasterous battle occured
> during this month.
>
> The name of the Teutoburg Forest in Germany will
> forever be connected
> to one of the most famous battles from ancient
> history, the clades
> Variana, the defeat of the Roman general Varus. In
> September 9 CE, a
> coalition of Germanic tribes, led by a nobleman
> named Arminius, may
> the dogs gnaw his bones, defeated the Seventeenth,
> Eighteenth, and
> Nineteenth legions and forced their commander
> Publius Quintilius Varus
> to commit suicide. The result of the battle was that
> Germania remained
> independent and was never included in the Roman
> empire.
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
>
>





______________________________________________________
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37659 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Battle of the Teutoburg Forest
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Ye gods and little fishes! How could I have missed nthis one?!?!
Probably a mixture of fatigue and a desire to block such a horrible
event from my memory :-) Anyways, here it is:

"Scarcely had Tiberius put the finishing touch upon the Pannonian and
Dalmatian war when, within five days of the completion of this task,
dispatches from Germania brought the baleful news of the death of
Varus, and of the slaughter of three legions, of as many divisions of
cavalry, and of six cohorts - as though fortune were granting us this
indulgence at least, that such a disaster should not be brought upon
us when our commander was occupied by other wars. The cause of this
defeat and the personality of the general require of me a brief
digression.

Varus Quintilius, descended from a famous rather than a high-born
family, was a man of mild character and of a quiet disposition,
somewhat slow in mind as he was in body, and more accustomed to the
leisure of the camp than to actual service in war. That he was no
despiser of money is demonstrated by his governorship of Syria: he
entered the rich province a poor man, but left it a rich man and the
province poor. When placed in charge of the army in Germania, he
entertained the notion that the Germans were a people who were men
only in limbs and voice, and that they, who could not be subdued by
the sword, could be soothed by the law. With this purpose in mind he
entered the heart of Germania as though he were going among a people
enjoying the blessings of peace, and sitting on his tribunal he wasted
the time of a summer campaign in holding court and observing the
proper details of legal procedure.

But the Germans, who with their great ferocity combine great craft, to
an extent scarcely credible to one who has had no experience with
them, and are a race to lying born, by trumping up a series of
fictitious lawsuits, now provoking one another to disputes, and now
expressing their gratitude that Roman justice was settling these
disputes, that their own barbarous nature was being softened down by
this new and hitherto unknown method, and that quarrels which were
usually settled by arms were now being ended by law, brought
Quintilius to such a complete degree of negligence, that he came to
look upon himself as a city praetor administering justice in the
forum, and not a general in command of an army in the heart of
Germania.

Thereupon appeared a young man of noble birth, brave in action and
alert in mind, possessing an intelligence quite beyond the ordinary
barbarian; he was, namely, Arminius, the son of Segimer, a prince of
that nation, and he showed in his countenance and in his eyes the fire
of the mind within. He had been associated with us constantly on
private campaigns, and had even attained the dignity of equestrian
rank. This young man made use of the negligence of the general as an
opportunity for treachery, sagaciously seeing that no one could be
more quickly overpowered than the man who feared nothing, and that the
most common beginning of disaster was a sense of security. At first,
then, he admitted but a few, later a large number, to a share in his
design; he told them, and convinced them too, that the Romans could be
crushed, added execution to resolve, and named a day for carrying out
the plot.

This was disclosed to Varus through Segestes, a loyal man of that race
and of illustrious name, who also demanded that the conspirators be
put in chains. But fate now dominated the plans of Varus and had
blindfolded the eyes of his mind. Indeed, it is usually the case that
heaven perverts the judgment of the man whose fortune it means to
reverse, and brings it to pass -and this is the wretched part of it-
that that which happens by chance seems to be deserved, and accident
passes over into culpability. And so Quintilius refused to believe the
story, and insisted upon judging the apparent friendship of the
Germans toward him by the standard of his merit. And, after this first
warning, there was no time left for a second.

The details of this terrible calamity, the heaviest that had befallen
the Romans on foreign soil since the disaster of Crassus in Parthia, I
shall endeavor to set forth, as others have done, in my larger work.
Here I can merely lament the disaster as a whole. An army unexcelled
in bravery, the first of Roman armies in discipline, in energy, and in
experience in the field, through the negligence of its general, the
perfidy of the enemy, and the unkindness of fortune was surrounded,
nor was as much opportunity as they had wished given to the soldiers
either of fighting or of extricating themselves, except against heavy
odds; nay, some were even heavily chastised for using the arms and
showing the spirit of Romans.

Hemmed in by forests and marshes and ambuscades, it was exterminated
almost to a man by the very enemy whom it had always slaughtered like
cattle, whose life or death had depended solely upon the wrath or the
pity of the Romans. The general had more courage to die than to fight,
for, following the example of his father and grandfather, he ran
himself through with his sword. Of the two prefects of the camp,
Lucius Eggius furnished a precedent as noble as that of Ceionius was
base, who, after the greater part of the army had perished, proposed
its surrender, preferring to die by torture at the hands of the enemy
than in battle." - Vellius Paterculus, The Roman Histories Book
II.117-120

Valete bene,

Cato


SOURCE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37660 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: SOMETHING MORE ABOUT TEUTOBURG FOREST BATTLE...
Salvete omnes,

I thought this piece of information could be of some interest, specially because offers some clues for later historical events...

The name of the Teutoburg Forest in Germany will forever be connected to one of the most famous battles from ancient history, the clades Variana, the defeat of the Roman general Varus. In September 9 CE, a coalition of Germanic tribes, led by a nobleman named Arminius, defeated the Seventeenth, Eighteenth, and Nineteenth legions and forced their commander Publius Quintilius Varus to commit suicide. The result of the battle was that Germania remained independent and was never included in the Roman empire.
In the nineteenth century, the battle became a powerful national symbol. In 1806, the French army of Napoleon Bonaparte decisively beat the armies of the German states. The humiliation was too big for the Germans, who started to look to the battle in the Teutoburg Forest as their finest hour. As Napoleon spoke a romanic language and presented himself as a Roman emperor, it was easy for the Germans to remind each other that they had once before defeated the welschen Erbfeind - an untranslatable expression that refers to the Latin speaking archenemies of Germany. The Teutoburg Forest became the symbol of the eternal opposition between the overcivilised and decadent Latin and the creative and vital Germanic people, between old France and new Germany.
To make the connection between the noble savages of Antiquity and the modern nation closer, the Germanic war leader whose name had been rendered by the Romans as Arminius was referred to by his (presumed) real Germanic name: Hermann. Already famous in the days of Martin Luther, who invented the name Hermann, the Germanic leader became a very popular hero in nineteenth-century and early twentieth-century Germany, and a symbol of national unity that could be used on almost any occasion. For example, in 1809, the romantic poet Heinrich von Kleist (1777-1811) wrote a play called Die Hermannsschlacht, to inspire the Germans to a national war against Napoleon. At Detmold, which was believed to be the site of the battle, the Hermannsdenkmal was erected in 1875. The first soccer club of nearby Bielefeld was (and is) called Arminia. The list is endless.
Arminius/Hermann was not alone. The nineteenth-century witnessed the resurrection of many ancient war leaders, who were used as a symbol by nationalists: the French exploited Vercingetorix, the Belgians Ambiorix, the Dutch Julius Civilis, and the British Boudicca. The difference is that they were all defeated by the Romans; Arminius, on the other hand, was ultimately victorious.
Although it is certainly incorrect to see the battle in the Teutoburg Forest as part of the history of an eternal, quasi-natural antithesis between France and Germany, it can not be denied that the Roman defeat was indeed one of the most decisive and influential battles in world history.

Valete omnes,

M•IVL•SEVERVS

--
_______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.

Powered by Outblaze
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37661 From: David Kling Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Celetrus;
You are welcome to apply to the Collegium Pontificum and awe us with your
knowlege, and vision. I would even welcome you showing us how it is supposed
to be done.
Vale;
C. Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 9/9/05, Ambrosius Celetrus <Aulus.Ambrosius.Celetrus@...> wrote:
>
> A. Ambrosius Celetrus G.A.F. Silvanae s.p.d.
>
> "G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana" wrote:
>
> >
> > I have hoped for some reflections, some guidance, some suggestions
> > for rituals anchored in the Religio. More specifically, and more
> > challenging, it would be helpful to me (and probably others of
> > the RR) to see some reflections on the roles of the Deities, and
> > the philosophical questions raised by the disaster from a RR
> > perspective. Applied Religio Romana, as it were. A perfect
> > example of a "teachable moment".
>
> >
> > If there are such messages on the list and I have missed them,
> > I apologize . . . I will scan again.
>
> Salve Silvana,
>
> And you will scan in vein, on either this or the Religio list.
>
> We are in the midst of the Ludi Romani, offered in honor of Iuppiter
> Optimus Maximus. Did ANY member of the CP offer public prayers to let
> "The Best and Greatest" know these games were truly offered with honor
> and respect, and not just as a chance to play quiz games, and gut
> cyber-gladiators?
>
> The answer is no. Yet in his answer to you, Buteo Modianus has the nerve
> to write:
>
> "AS A PONTIFEX I make offerings to the Gods for the CITIZENS of Nova
> Roma -- not the citizens of the United States," and "in my capacity as a
> priest of Nova Roma, I am concerned with Nova Romans; their success,
> safety, and well being. But my official offerings -- as a pontifex and
> flamen --- to the Gods are for citizens of Nova Roma."
>
> What offerings? What prayers? On the Ides of last month, Buteo, who is
> also flamen Pomonalis, in answer to similar criticism from me wrote, "I
> attempt to honor Pomona the best I can, and as often as I can in a
> public venue." That day was also the Vertumnalia, and thus also a day
> for Dea Pomona by association. Did the flamen Pomonalis "attempt to
> honor" Her, in any way whatsoever, that day? The answer is no.
>
> Buteo Modianus, and the rest of the Collegium Pontificum, will write
> reams about why there can be no women pontifices, on appropiate sources
> for ritual (to be studied but never used), on name changes, and how they
> should be addressed.
>
> But will they stir their fingers to offer public prayers for one of NR's
> host countries, or even those public prayers it is their vowed duty to
> offer on behalf of Nova Roma as the sacral year unfolds? The anser is
> no. Time and time agian, we have seen the answer is no.
>
> As alluded about, there is a discussion going on on the Religio list
> about forms of address for our silent (silent with respect to their
> duties, that is) pontiffs. Perhaps our Latinists can provide the correct
> equivalents for poseurs, charlatans and mountebanks.
>
> Vale bene,
> Amborius Celetrus
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37662 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: SOMETHING MORE ABOUT TEUTOBURG FOREST BATTLE...
Salvete omnes,

Good article! What I note is that we are all products of various
times and eras. I remember people who were considered terrorists
around the world when I was a youngster also later became national
heroes, especially after decolonization and the rise of the 60's
open, liberal movements. This covered everyone from Kenyetta to Che
Guevera. A well known personality of 19th century Canada, Louis
Reil, a highly educated metis leader who led the North West
Rebellion and later hanged was a traitor when I was young but now is
exhonorated as a great leader and human right activist who was
unjustly put to death. I was just reading an article on the history
of piracy and the author pointed out that these people were not a
particularily pleasant lot and he was concerned that the Robin Hood
impression we are given of them today is somewhat akin to making Ben
Laden a hero and champion of the people a few hundred years from now.

Rome did a lot for Europe and did much to advance western
civilization. The in thing today is this evil empire concept which I
find funny at times since empires, while certainly have been wrong
on some of their policies or decsions, still brought a lot of
positive benifits to their colonies or scattered warring disunited
tribes. Think of the development of Roman roads to the British
railways around the world and their infrastructures as one example.

Now one gripe I have about Arminius' character was that he profited
by being a turn coat. He took the " Saxon shilling " as the Irish
rebel song says of others, collaborated as an officer in the Roman
army which ultimately lead to his victory in the forest since he
knew the Roman tactics.

Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M•IVL•SEVERVS
<marcusiuliusseverus@l...> wrote:
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I thought this piece of information could be of some interest,
specially because offers some clues for later historical events...
>
> The name of the Teutoburg Forest in Germany will forever be
connected to one of the most famous battles from ancient history,
the clades Variana, the defeat of the Roman general Varus. In
September 9 CE, a coalition of Germanic tribes, led by a nobleman
named Arminius, defeated the Seventeenth, Eighteenth, and Nineteenth
legions and forced their commander Publius Quintilius Varus to
commit suicide. The result of the battle was that Germania remained
independent and was never included in the Roman empire.
> In the nineteenth century, the battle became a powerful national
symbol. In 1806, the French army of Napoleon Bonaparte decisively
beat the armies of the German states. The humiliation was too big
for the Germans, who started to look to the battle in the Teutoburg
Forest as their finest hour. As Napoleon spoke a romanic language
and presented himself as a Roman emperor, it was easy for the
Germans to remind each other that they had once before defeated the
welschen Erbfeind - an untranslatable expression that refers to the
Latin speaking archenemies of Germany. The Teutoburg Forest became
the symbol of the eternal opposition between the overcivilised and
decadent Latin and the creative and vital Germanic people, between
old France and new Germany.
> To make the connection between the noble savages of Antiquity and
the modern nation closer, the Germanic war leader whose name had
been rendered by the Romans as Arminius was referred to by his
(presumed) real Germanic name: Hermann. Already famous in the days
of Martin Luther, who invented the name Hermann, the Germanic leader
became a very popular hero in nineteenth-century and early twentieth-
century Germany, and a symbol of national unity that could be used
on almost any occasion. For example, in 1809, the romantic poet
Heinrich von Kleist (1777-1811) wrote a play called Die
Hermannsschlacht, to inspire the Germans to a national war against
Napoleon. At Detmold, which was believed to be the site of the
battle, the Hermannsdenkmal was erected in 1875. The first soccer
club of nearby Bielefeld was (and is) called Arminia. The list is
endless.
> Arminius/Hermann was not alone. The nineteenth-century witnessed
the resurrection of many ancient war leaders, who were used as a
symbol by nationalists: the French exploited Vercingetorix, the
Belgians Ambiorix, the Dutch Julius Civilis, and the British
Boudicca. The difference is that they were all defeated by the
Romans; Arminius, on the other hand, was ultimately victorious.
> Although it is certainly incorrect to see the battle in the
Teutoburg Forest as part of the history of an eternal, quasi-natural
antithesis between France and Germany, it can not be denied that the
Roman defeat was indeed one of the most decisive and influential
battles in world history.
>
> Valete omnes,
>
> M•IVL•SEVERVS
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
> This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.
>
> Powered by Outblaze
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37663 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: EMPIRES AND HISTORY
Salve, Quintus Lanius Paulinus, et salvete, omnes!

You're quite right. We can not and must not read history as a somewhat neutral recording of human facts and deeds in black and white... Frequently, yesterday's traitors are today's heroes. But going back to the Teutoburg Forest battle, I have wondered many times if Germany really benefited from the Roman defeat... Yes, as you wrote, the Roman Empire was indeed an empire, but performed real wonders by carrying civilization to almost all of the world then known...
Regarding Arminius or Hermann, as Germans prefer, it's something ironic that this towering figure of German nationalism was a product of the Roman world...

Salve, et salvete, omnes!

M•IVL•SEVERVS

--
_______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.

Powered by Outblaze
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37664 From: Céline Chapamn Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: Good News
saluto Octavius Verus,
congratulations and hope soon that I will be able to make the same announcement
vale
Aurelia Cotta
not yet a citizen.

FAC <fraelov@...> a écrit :
salve Octavius Verus,
congratulations and welcome in Nova Roma!
Enjoy it and please contact me for any question.

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Senior Consul

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Sextus Octavius
<octaviusverus@y...> wrote:
> Salvete Omines,
>
> I would like to annouce that I have recently taken and
> passed the citizenship test.
>
> Valete,
> S. Octavius Verus
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
> http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/




SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire Roman empire coin

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------




Yahoo! Mail - Votre e-mail personnel et gratuit qui vous suit partout !
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://mail.yahoo.fr

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37665 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-09
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Ambrosius Celetrus C.F. Buteoni Modiano

David Kling wrote:

> Celetrus;
> You are welcome to apply to the Collegium Pontificum and awe us with
> your
> knowlege, and vision.

Your invitation is both funny and saddening. Had it been made during
last year's (2757 a.u.c.) Cerialia, which I helped with very marginally
though enthusiastically, I would have been honored. I also would have
had to decline because my knowledge of the Religio at that time was
limited. I did, however, plan to apply for one of the open priesthoods;
until it became clear that safeguarding your sinecures was the only
activity that could rouse any of the CP to do anything.

Now, after more than a year of watching the Gods and Goddesses go
consistently and shamefully unhonored by all but a handful of NR's
religious establishment, though I probably could add some insights to
the Collegium's knowledge base, I can't think of nine other people I
would least want to be associated with. Really, it would be like
applying for a position on the board at Enron during the height of the
scandal, or on Michael Brown's personal staff at FEMA.

No, wait, it would be more like offering to assist Tullius Hostilius at
the altar.


> I would even welcome you showing us how it is supposed
> to be done.
> Vale;
> C. Fabius Buteo Modianus

The last resort of the scoundrel who cannot, or will not, do his or her
job. It's really rather simple, and every practitioner here in NR knows
how to go about it: check the calendar to see what the upcoming feriae
are, prepare a ritual and prayers, and offer it. You all claim to have
been doing vast amounts of research recovering the forms of the Religio.
What is the problem in appropriately honoring the Dii Immortales, if not
either laziness, or that the research doesn't really exist?

Your colleague, Fabius Maximus wrote this in Post 37091:

"I remember an earlier Nova Roma where everybody just did their job, and
no
one expected props for doing so. Perhaps one day we shall return to
that."

You job, Modiane, your duty and your privilege, along with the rest of
the CP's (have you forgotten that you are all honored to do this job for
the citizens of Nova Roma?), is to offer public respect to the Gods and
Goddesses of Rome - not when you feel like it, or remember it, but every
single time it is called for, without fail. If you cannot do it. Step
down.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37666 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Salve Ambrosi Celetre,

I would like to thank you for your offerings, prayers, and spiritual
guidance for and to the victims of the recent hurricane. I'm sure you
have helped the citizens of Nova Roma, and the victims of Hurricane
Katrina, with them.

Vale,

Q. Caecilius Metellus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37667 From: David Kling Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Celetrus:
You obviously have an extremely negative opinion of me; of which you are
entitled to. It is unfortunate that you feel this way. I believe that it is
best, for me, to let you keep your current position than to try and convince
you otherwise as it is apparent to me that no matter what I do you will find
fault in it.
I have no desire to engage in an assault of your character, as I really do
not know you. However, if you desire to continue to belittle me, and find
fault in me then so be it. Fire away, have at it, and enjoy.
Vale;
C. Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 9/9/05, Ambrosius Celetrus <Aulus.Ambrosius.Celetrus@...> wrote:
>
> Ambrosius Celetrus C.F. Buteoni Modiano
>
> David Kling wrote:
>
> > Celetrus;
> > You are welcome to apply to the Collegium Pontificum and awe us with
> > your
> > knowlege, and vision.
>
> Your invitation is both funny and saddening. Had it been made during
> last year's (2757 a.u.c.) Cerialia, which I helped with very marginally
> though enthusiastically, I would have been honored. I also would have
> had to decline because my knowledge of the Religio at that time was
> limited. I did, however, plan to apply for one of the open priesthoods;
> until it became clear that safeguarding your sinecures was the only
> activity that could rouse any of the CP to do anything.
>
> Now, after more than a year of watching the Gods and Goddesses go
> consistently and shamefully unhonored by all but a handful of NR's
> religious establishment, though I probably could add some insights to
> the Collegium's knowledge base, I can't think of nine other people I
> would least want to be associated with. Really, it would be like
> applying for a position on the board at Enron during the height of the
> scandal, or on Michael Brown's personal staff at FEMA.
>
> No, wait, it would be more like offering to assist Tullius Hostilius at
> the altar.
>
>
> > I would even welcome you showing us how it is supposed
> > to be done.
> > Vale;
> > C. Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> The last resort of the scoundrel who cannot, or will not, do his or her
> job. It's really rather simple, and every practitioner here in NR knows
> how to go about it: check the calendar to see what the upcoming feriae
> are, prepare a ritual and prayers, and offer it. You all claim to have
> been doing vast amounts of research recovering the forms of the Religio.
> What is the problem in appropriately honoring the Dii Immortales, if not
> either laziness, or that the research doesn't really exist?
>
> Your colleague, Fabius Maximus wrote this in Post 37091:
>
> "I remember an earlier Nova Roma where everybody just did their job, and
> no
> one expected props for doing so. Perhaps one day we shall return to
> that."
>
> You job, Modiane, your duty and your privilege, along with the rest of
> the CP's (have you forgotten that you are all honored to do this job for
> the citizens of Nova Roma?), is to offer public respect to the Gods and
> Goddesses of Rome - not when you feel like it, or remember it, but every
> single time it is called for, without fail. If you cannot do it. Step
> down.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37668 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Q. Metellus C. Aureliae Quiritibusque sal. dic.

> I have hoped for some reflections, some guidance, some suggestions
> for rituals anchored in the Religio. More specifically, and more
> challenging, it would be helpful to me (and probably others of
> the RR) to see some reflections on the roles of the Deities, and
> the philosophical questions raised by the disaster from a RR
> perspective. Applied Religio Romana, as it were. A perfect
> example of a "teachable moment".

Perhaps, indeed, each citizen, each priest, each magistrate, each
senator who failed to make a response on this list, or on another list,
might be at fault for not doing so. If that were the statement, I might
indeed find myself in agreement. But that was not the statement.

It appears to me that the perception is that the Collegium Pontificum
holds the responsibility for the Religio on the whole. But if I may,
I'd like to quote from the often-quoted Prof. John Scheid, who says,
"His [a priest's] duties were limited to specific actions and did not
extend to general religious competence. No priest, not even the
pontifex maximus, was responsible in all areas."* Of course, that's
certainly not to mean that, for my own part, I have no interest in
offering what you, Gaia Aurelia, ask for above. In fact, my position is
quite the opposite. I just feel that the point needs to be made of
exactly over what a Roman priest, at least in the historic view, had
responsibility.

Certainly a bit of reflection on the roles of the various deities who
find themselves placed in the Religio Romana might be useful, and,
apparently, welcome. As to the philosophical questions, I'm afraid I
lack the competence to deal with much of anything philosophical, however
much I may covet my copy of the complete works of Plato.

In any case, I have refrained from using my title, or even taking my
oath, until I can be properly inaugurated, which I hope to complete at
the Elysium Gathering in Springfield, OH, USA, which both myself and
Pontifex Buteo will be attending, and at which I will be giving two
workshops on the Religio.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37669 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Re: SOMETHING MORE ABOUT TEUTOBURG FOREST BATTLE...
In a message dated 9/9/2005 2:18:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
marcusiuliusseverus@... writes:
Arminius, on the other hand, was ultimately victorious.
But let's put this in perspective. The Wald was a disaster, true, but
Hermann was never able to exploit it. Rome's Germanic allies stayed loyal, Tiberius
pulled legiones out of Hispania and Gaul, and with the Pannionan revolt
quelled the Romans were ready to invade
Germania. Augustus death slowed preparations and the I Germanica and XX
Victrix mutiny
was untimely, but Germanicus was able to recover the Roman dead, and bury
them, recover two eagles, give a drubbing to Herman at Idistavisio, (no matter
how hard Delbruck tries to whitewash it, when your charismatic chieftain flees
the field it is a defeat) and took the boundary rampart of Angrivarii. He also
made sure Hermann was neutralized. The Germans stayed independent, except
for the Lime tribes, but Germania was never going to be a true Roman province,
no matter how much wishful thinking was going on in Roman Imperial circles.
The lack of centralization would make such a thing impossible to administer.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37670 From: c_fabia_livia@yahoo.co.uk Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Ludi Romani theatrical quiz (6)
Who was Dosseuus?

Answers, plus your Roman name, via private email (c_fabia_livia@...) please, within the next 24 hours.

Livia





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37671 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Ave Caecili Metelle,

"Q. Caecilius Metellus" wrote:

> Salve Ambrosi Celetre,
>
> I would like to thank you for your offerings, prayers, and spiritual
> guidance for and to the victims of the recent hurricane. I'm sure you
>
> have helped the citizens of Nova Roma, and the victims of Hurricane
> Katrina, with them.
>
> Vale,
>
> Q. Caecilius Metellus

:-) While I suspect the above is sarcasm, I will thank you anyway for
suggesting that the humble prayers I offer daily at my lararium have
any efficacy in either assuaging or ameliorating the conditions
afflicting Katrina's survivors.

Personally, I prefer more concrete acts. While I have, as I'm sure a
great many here have done also, donated money, for those of you like me
with a desire to do something physical and tangible, but cannot pick up
and join a Red Cross crew, I have a suggestion. Find an Indian or
Oriental grocer in your area, buy a few 20-25 lb sacks of rice and
lentils (or as many as are available and you can afford), and take them
to the bulk food collection areas that are being formed all about. There
is something far more satisfying spiritually to this, as opposed to
signing a check, or typing your credit card number. And one pound of
cooked lentils, with an equal amount of cooked rice, provides a protein
rich serving for at least 14 people.

Vale,
Ambrosius Celetrus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37672 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Ambrosius Celetrus Q. Caecilio Metello s.d.

"Q. Caecilius Metellus" wrote:

> It appears to me that the perception is that the Collegium Pontificum
>
> holds the responsibility for the Religio on the whole.

"The Collegium Pontificum consists of XV priests who serve the public
rites of the State religion and have general authority to determine the
structure and nature of both the public rites and the priesthoods
themselves."
http://www.novaroma.org/religio_romana/priests_and_priesthoods.html

> I just feel that the point needs to be made of
> exactly over what a Roman priest, at least in the historic view, had
> responsibility.

To "serve the public rites of the State religion," something the current
Collegium Pontificum, of which you are now a member, consistently and
shamelessly fails to do.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37673 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Re: The Pontificate on Katrina?
Ambrosius Celetrus C.F.B. Modiano s.d.

David Kling wrote:

> Celetrus:
> You obviously have an extremely negative opinion of me;

Actually, I have no personal opinion of you. I'm told that you are a
nice guy, but that is irrelevant.

It is only when you claim that you offer prayers as a pontifex on behalf
of Nova Roma, or to Dea Pomona as her flamen (here in NR, I don't care
what you do on the campuses of Ohio), when in fact you do not, that I am
roused to criticize both you, and your colleagues on the CP.


> I believe that it is best, for me, to let you keep your current
> position than to try and convince you otherwise as

To borrow from the Bard, "Aye, there's the rub." I don't recognize that
you, or any member of the CP, are in a position to "let" me be anything.
It would very much be otherwise if you people actually did your jobs,
and therefore commanded respect; but you don't and you don't.

> it is apparent to me that no matter what I do you will find
> fault in it.

Oh my, not true. Evidently you read but do not understand. Do your job,
offer (i.e. post) the prayers you say you do, take the auspices when you
are supposed to (and let us know the results), and I will be the first
to applaud you.

> However, if you desire to continue to belittle me, and find
> fault in me then so be it. Fire away, have at it, and enjoy.

I would not be able to find fault in you if you actually served "the
public rites of the State religion." So long as you say you do, without
actually doing so, I will "fire away," and "have at it." But I will not,
as I do not, enjoy it. This is all rather distasteful, and as far as I
can tell, futile.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37674 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Sept.
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Today is ante diem IV Idus Septembris; the day is comitialis.

"Patria est communis omnium parens." (Our native land is the common
parent of us all) - Cicero


"The consuls for the following year were C. Sulpicius and C. Licinius
Calvus. They resumed operations against the Hernici, and invaded their
territory, but did not find the enemy in the open. They attacked and
captured Ferentinum, a Hernican city; but as they were returning home
the Tiburtines closed their gates against them. There had previously
been numerous complaints made on both sides, but this last provocation
finally decided the Romans, in case the Fetials failed to get redress,
to declare war against the Tiburtines. It is generally understood that
T. Quinctius Pennus was the Dictator and Ser. Cornelius Maluginensis
the Master of the horse. According to Licinius Macer, the Dictator was
nominated by the consul Licinius. His colleague, Sulpicius, was
anxious to get the elections over before he departed for the war, in
the hope of being himself re-elected, if he were on the spot, and
Licinius determined to thwart his colleague's self-seeking ambition.
Licinius Macer's desire to appropriate the credit of this to his house
(the Licinii) lessens the weight of his authority. As I find no
mention of this in the older annalists, I am more inclined to believe
that it was the prospect of a Gaulish war which was the immediate
cause why a Dictator was nominated. At all events it was in this year
that the Gauls formed their camp by the Salarian road, three miles
from the City at the bridge across the Anio.

In face of this sudden and alarming inroad the Dictator proclaimed a
suspension of all business, and made every man who was liable to serve
take the military oath. He marched out of the City with an immense
army and fixed his camp on this side the Anio. Each side had left the
bridge between them intact, as its destruction might have been thought
due to fears of an attack. There were frequent skirmishes for the
possession of the bridge; as these were indecisive, the ques- tion was
left unsettled. A Gaul of extraordinary stature strode forward on to
the unoccupied bridge, and shouting as loudly as he could, cried: `Let
the bravest man that Rome possesses come out and fight me, that we two
may decide which people is the superior in war.' "- Livy, History of
Rome 7.9


"In Upper Egypt on the first day of the solar year by Coptic
reckoning, that is, on the tenth of September, when the Nile has
generally reached its highest point, the regular government is
suspended for three days and every town chooses its own ruler. This
temporary lord wears a sort of tall fool's cap and a long flaxen
beard, and is enveloped in a strange mantle. With a wand of office in
his hand and attended by men disguised as scribes, executioners, and
so forth, he proceeds to the Governor's house. The latter allows
himself to be deposed; and the mock king, mounting the throne, holds a
tribunal, to the decisions of which even the governor and his
officials must bow. After three days the mock king is condemned to
death; the envelope or shell in which he was encased is committed to
the flames, and from its ashes the Fellah creeps forth. The custom
perhaps points to an old practice of burning a real king in grim
earnest." - Sir James Frazer, "The Golden Bough", ch. 25


In ancient Greece today was celebrated in honor of Asclepigenia of
Athens; a younger contemporary of Hypatia. Asclepigenia taught in the
neo-Platonic school in Athens, which was headed by her father. As a
Pagan philosopher, she attempted to understand and master the "secret"
principles of metaphysics which controlled the universe. Asclepigenia
applied magic and theurgic principles to affect fate and she applied
her knowledge of Plato and Aristotle to the great religious and
metaphysical questions raised by Christian ethical theory.

She believed that fates were potentially changeable if one had a clear
understanding of metaphysics, cosmology, magic, and theurgy. She
tended more toward mysticism, magic, and contemplation of the
mysteries of Platonic and Aristotelian metaphysics. Upon the death of
her father, Asclepigenia, along with her brother and a colleague,
inherited the direction of the Academy, and her most famous student
was the philosopher, Proclus.

Asclepigenia was named for Asclepius. Asclepius was a Greek hero who
later become the Greek god of medicine and healing. The son of Apollo
and Coronis, Asclepius had five daughters, Aceso, Iaso, Panacea,
Aglaea and Hygieia. He was worshipped throughout the Greek world but
his most famous sanctuary was located in Epidaurus which is situated
in the northeastern Peloponnese. The main attribute of Asclepius is a
physician's staff with an Asclepian snake wrapped around it; this is
how he was distinguished in the art of healing, and his attribute
still survives to this day as the symbol of the modern medical
profession. The cock was also sacred to Asclepius and was the bird
they sacrificed as his altar.

The mother of Asclepius, Coronis, was a mortal, the daughter of
Phlegyas, a king of Thessaly. Coronis was unfaithful to Apollo, and
Artemis, Apollo's twin sister, killed her for her unfaithfulness.
Coronis was placed upon a funeral pyre. (One version says that Apollo
cast her into the fires of his own anger.) As her body started to
burn, Apollo felt sorrow for his unborn son and snatched the child
Asclepius from his mother's corpse, saving him from death. Apollo then
handed Asclepius to the Centaur Chiron who became his tutor and
mentor. Chiron taught Asclepius the art of healing. According to
Pindar (Pythian Odes), Asclepius also acquired the knowledge of
surgery, the use of drugs, love potions and incantations, and
according to Apollodorus (the Library), Athena gave Asclepius a magic
potion made from the blood of the Gorgon. Legend tells that the blood
of the Gorgon has a different effect depending from which side the
blood was taken. If taken from the right side of the Gorgon, it has a
miraculous effect and is said to be able to bring the dead back to
life, but taken from the left side it is a deadly poison.

With these gifts Asclepius exceeded the fringes of human knowledge.
However, he offended the great god Zeus by accepting money in exchange
for raising the dead. (In one version it was the goddess Artemis who
implored Asclepius to resurrect Hippolytus, a favourite of hers.) In
the eyes of Zeus, Asclepius' action upset the natural order of the
universe - a mere mortal helping man evade death. With one swift
action, the great Zeus sent down a thunderbolt killing both men. (In
some versions Zeus only killed Asclepius). Realising the good
Asclepius had brought to man, the great Zeus made him into a god,
placing him among the stars, transforming Asclepius into the
constellation Ophiuchus (the serpent-bearer). The snake was used in
the healing ritual; non-poisonous snakes were left in the dormitory
where the sick slept overnight on the bare ground.

The cult of Asclepius became very popular during the 300s B.C. and the
cult centres (known as an Asclepieion) were used by priests to cure
the sick. Invalids also came to the shrines of Asclepius to find cures
for their ailments (in the same fashion pilgrims visit Lourdes today.)
The process of healing was known as incubation. The patient would
spend the night in a dormitory. During the night they would supposedly
be visited by the god in a dream. Priests would interpret the dreams
and then recommend a remedy or give advice on how they could be cured
with perhaps a recommended visit to the baths and gymnasiums. There
were many centres and schools of medicine, from Trikkis in Thessaly to
the island of Cos. It is believed that Hippocrates, a great doctor of
antiquity, plied his trade on the island of Cos. It is also said that
Hippocrates was a descendant of Asclepius.

The Romans adopted the cult of Asclepius, but changed his name to
Latin; they called him Aesculapius.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/Texts/latin_TOC.html),
Aesclepigenia (http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/9974/old.html),
Aesclepius ("Asclepius." Encyclopedia Mythica from Encyclopedia
Mythica Online.
<http://www.pantheon.org/articles/a/asclepius.html>)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37675 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Re: The Pontificate (was: ... on Katrina?)
Q. Metello A. Ambrosio sal.

> To "serve the public rites of the State religion," something the current
> Collegium Pontificum, of which you are now a member, consistently and
> shamelessly fails to do.

Well, Celetre, let's get right down to this one. First, I'm glad you
made the point "of which you are *now* a member" (personal emphasis
added). I've been a pontifex-designate for exactly seven days. During
that time, of course, I haven't done anything public, for one reason and
one alone, that being that I have yet not been inaugurated. However, I
can safely make it known that of the projects that I have started to
work on, hopefully soon, perhaps even ante inaugurationem, the biggest
and, to me, most important project, will make itself to the public light.

About what the Collegium "consistently and shamelessly fails to do."
There are a number of things which fall into this category. But, for
that matter, you could say that there are a number of things any given
priest, magistrate, or senator "consistently and shamlessly fails to
do." For one thing, as much as I hate to hear it myself, we are a
volunteer organization, and as such, it is not so unlikely that we will
have many of our people go inactive, or just not do something. For a
number of citizens, there is no reason to do whatever it is they may be
required to do. But for my own part, I intend to help bring about
change, and, at least from me, you can expect to see more activity than
you have seen in some pontiffs from the past. As I would put it, "I've
just been given the keys to my new office. Just let me get moved into
it, please."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37676 From: c_fabia_livia@yahoo.co.uk Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Picture quiz - technical hitch
Due to limitations of technology, the picture quiz is skipping a day - hopefully back to working order tomorrow!

Livia



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37677 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Magna Mater Project site?
Salvete Omnes,

could anyone tell me where is now the site for the Magna Mater Project? (maybe I missed
something?) The link on the main site is not valid any more. Thank you.

Valete,

Sextus Apollonius Scipio

Propraetor Galliae




______________________________________________________
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37678 From: eve_merrickwilliams Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Citizenship exam
Salve omnes,
I am aspiring to citizenship of Nova Roma, and I have not as yet,
attempted the Citizenship exam. I was wondering if there were any
guide lines on what should be studied for the exam, possible these are
posted on site and I have have missed them, if so where do I look,
please! If not could someone give a hint as to the general areas I
should study and the level of knowlege required.
Vale bene,
Sulpicia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37679 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-10
Subject: Re: Citizenship exam
Salve Sulpicia,

The exam questions are drawn from information made available in various
sections of the Nova Roma website. Just make a systematic study of the
various Res Publica, Pantheon, Cives, Via Romana, and Forum sections.

Vale,

Marinus

eve_merrickwilliams wrote:

> Salve omnes,
> I am aspiring to citizenship of Nova Roma, and I have not as yet,
> attempted the Citizenship exam. I was wondering if there were any
> guide lines on what should be studied for the exam, possible these are
> posted on site and I have have missed them, if so where do I look,
> please! If not could someone give a hint as to the general areas I
> should study and the level of knowlege required.
> Vale bene,
> Sulpicia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37680 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: SOMETHING MORE ABOUT TEUTOBURG FOREST BATTLE...
Gotta love them liberals... nah, NOT really.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mjk@...>
wrote:
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Good article! What I note is that we are all
products of various
> times and eras. I remember people who were
considered terrorists
> around the world when I was a youngster also later
became national
> heroes, especially after decolonization and the rise
of the 60's
> open, liberal movements. This covered everyone from
Kenyetta to Che
> Guevera. A well known personality of 19th century
Canada, Louis
> Reil, a highly educated metis leader who led the
North West
> Rebellion and later hanged was a traitor when I was
young but now is
> exhonorated as a great leader and human right
activist who was
> unjustly put to death. I was just reading an article
on the history
> of piracy and the author pointed out that these
people were not a
> particularily pleasant lot and he was concerned that
the Robin Hood
> impression we are given of them today is somewhat
akin to making Ben
> Laden a hero and champion of the people a few
hundred years from now.
>
> Rome did a lot for Europe and did much to advance
western
> civilization. The in thing today is this evil empire
concept which I
> find funny at times since empires, while certainly
have been wrong
> on some of their policies or decsions, still brought
a lot of
> positive benifits to their colonies or scattered
warring disunited
> tribes. Think of the development of Roman roads to
the British
> railways around the world and their infrastructures
as one example.
>
> Now one gripe I have about Arminius' character was
that he profited
> by being a turn coat. He took the " Saxon shilling "
as the Irish
> rebel song says of others, collaborated as an
officer in the Roman
> army which ultimately lead to his victory in the
forest since he
> knew the Roman tactics.
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M•IVL•SEVERVS
> <marcusiuliusseverus@l...> wrote:
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > I thought this piece of information could be of
some interest,
> specially because offers some clues for later
historical events...
> >
> > The name of the Teutoburg Forest in Germany will
forever be
> connected to one of the most famous battles from
ancient history,
> the clades Variana, the defeat of the Roman general
Varus. In
> September 9 CE, a coalition of Germanic tribes, led
by a nobleman
> named Arminius, defeated the Seventeenth,
Eighteenth, and Nineteenth
> legions and forced their commander Publius
Quintilius Varus to
> commit suicide. The result of the battle was that
Germania remained
> independent and was never included in the Roman
empire.
> > In the nineteenth century, the battle became a
powerful national
> symbol. In 1806, the French army of Napoleon
Bonaparte decisively
> beat the armies of the German states. The
humiliation was too big
> for the Germans, who started to look to the battle
in the Teutoburg
> Forest as their finest hour. As Napoleon spoke a
romanic language
> and presented himself as a Roman emperor, it was
easy for the
> Germans to remind each other that they had once
before defeated the
> welschen Erbfeind - an untranslatable expression
that refers to the
> Latin speaking archenemies of Germany. The Teutoburg
Forest became
> the symbol of the eternal opposition between the
overcivilised and
> decadent Latin and the creative and vital Germanic
people, between
> old France and new Germany.
> > To make the connection between the noble savages
of Antiquity and
> the modern nation closer, the Germanic war leader
whose name had
> been rendered by the Romans as Arminius was referred
to by his
> (presumed) real Germanic name: Hermann. Already
famous in the days
> of Martin Luther, who invented the name Hermann, the
Germanic leader
> became a very popular hero in nineteenth-century and
early twentieth-
> century Germany, and a symbol of national unity that
could be used
> on almost any occasion. For example, in 1809, the
romantic poet
> Heinrich von Kleist (1777-1811) wrote a play called
Die
> Hermannsschlacht, to inspire the Germans to a natio
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37681 From: c_fabia_livia@yahoo.co.uk Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Ludi Romani theatre quiz (7)
When did construction of a stone theatre first begin at Rome?

Answers, plus your Roman name, via private email (c_fabia_livia@...) please within the next 24 hours.

Livia



___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37682 From: c_fabia_livia@yahoo.co.uk Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Ludi Romani picture quiz (5)
Today's picture is at
http://livia.org.uk/index.php?link=games

This one is slightly harder than the others, so today there's only one question, worth 2 points:

What is depicted here?

Please send your answer, plus your Roman name, by private email (c_fabia_livia@...) within the next 24 hours.

Livia





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37683 From: Gaius Aemilius Papinianus Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: SOMETHING MORE ABOUT TEUTOBURG FOREST BATTLE...
Gaius Aemilius Papinianus omnibus salutem!

Scelestis Germanus Josef Victor von Scheffel anno 1847 conscripsit de
clade Variana (melodia musica utitur J. Gungli) carmen quod in
Germania omnis puer novit:

Als die Römer frech geworden,
Sim serim sim sim sim sim,
Zogen sie nach Deutschlands Norden,
Sim serim sim sim sim sim,
Vorne mit Trompetenschall,
Te rä tä tä tä te rä,
Ritt der Generalfeldmarschall,
Te rä tä tä tä te rä,
Herr Quintilius Varus,
Wau, wau, wau, wau, wau,
Herr Quintilius Varus,
|: Schnäde räng täng :|
Schnäde räng täng, de räng täng täng

2. In dem Teutoburger Walde,
Huh! Wie piff der Wind so kalte,
Raben folgen durch die Luft,
Und es war ein Moderduft,
Wie von Blut und Leichen,


3. Plötzlich aus des Waldes Duster
Brachen kampfhaft die Cherusker,
Mit Gott für Fürst und Vaterland
Stürtzen sie sich wutentbrannt
Auf die Legionen.


4. Weh, das ward ein großer Morden,
Sie schlugen die Kohorten,
Nur die röm'sche Reiterei
Rettete sich noch ins Frei',
Denn sie war zu Pferde.

5. O Quintili, armer Feldherr,
Dachtest du, daß so die Welt wär'?
Er geriet in einen Sumpf,
Verlor zwei Stiefel und einen Strumpf
Und blieb elend stecken.

6. Da sprach er voll Ärgernussen
Zum Centurio Titiussen:
Kam'rad, zeuch dein Schwert hervor
Und von hinten mich durchbor,
Da doch alles futsch ist.

7. In dem armen röm'schen Heere
Diente auch als volontäre
Scävola, ein Rechtskandidat,
Den man schnöd gefangen hat,
Wie die andern all.

8. Diesem ist es schlimm ergangen,
Eh daß man ihn aufgehangen,
Stach man ihm durch Zung und Herz,
Nagelte ihn hinterwärts
Auf sein corpus iuris.

9. Als die Waldschlacht war zu Ende,
Rieb Fürst Hermann sich die Hände,
Und um seinen Sieg zu weih'n,
Lud er die Cherusker ein
Zu 'nem großen Frühstück.

10. Hu, da gab's westfäl'schen Schinken,
Bier, soviel man wollte trinken;
Auch im Zechen blieb er Held,
Doch auch seine Frau Thusneld
Trank walkürenmäßig.

11. Nur in Rom war man nicht heiter,
Sondern kaufte Trauerkleider;
G'rade als beim Mittagsmahl
Augustus saß im Kaisersaal,
Kam die Trauerbotschaft.

12. Erst blieb ihm vor jähem Schrecken
Ein Stück Pfau im Halse stecken,
Dann geriet er außer sich
Und schrie: Varus, Fluch auf dich,
Redde legiones!

13. Sein deutscher Sklave, Schmidt geheißen,
Dacht': Ihn soll das Mäusle beißen,
Wenn er sie je wieder kriegt,
Denn wer einmal tot daliegt,
Wird nicht mehr lebendig.

14. Und zu Ehren der Geschichten
Tat ein Denkmal man errichten,
Deutschlands Kraft und Einigkeit
Kündet es jetzt weit und breit:
"Mögen sie nur kommen!"

---------
What a scoundrel! ;)


Pax vobiscum.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37684 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Fw: [Explorator] explorator 8.20
Salve Romans

FYI

vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: david meadows<mailto:dmeadows@...>
To: explorator@yahoogroups.com<mailto:explorator@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 10:05 AM
Subject: [Explorator] explorator 8.20


[apologies ... my email program appears to be firing blanks this a.m.]

================================================================
explorator 8.20 September 11, 2005
================================================================
Editor's note: Most urls should be active for at least eight
hours from the time of publication.

For your computer's protection, Explorator is sent in plain text
and NEVER has attachments. Be suspicious of any Explorator which
arrives otherwise!!!
================================================================
================================================================
Thanks to Arthur Shippee, Bill Kennedy, Adrian Murdoch, Donna
Hurst, 'Duke Jason', Edward Rockstein, James Stewart, Joan
Griffith, John McMahon, Joseph Lauer, Lee Phelps, Mata Kimasitayo,
Nick Lowe, Richard C. Griffiths, R.M. Howe, Rochelle Altman,
Rick Pettigrew, Robert Heuman, Tony Jackson, W. Richard Frahm,
and Yonatan Nadelman for headses upses this week (as always
hoping I have left no one out).
================================================================
EARLY HUMANS
================================================================
Another piece on how early humans affected the climate:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4219818.stm<http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4219818.stm>

The invention of the spear led to peace, supposedly:

http://tinyurl.com/852z5<http://tinyurl.com/852z5> (National Geographic)

They're still looking for 'Peking Man':

http://tinyurl.com/a635e<http://tinyurl.com/a635e> (IOL)
================================================================
ANCIENT NEAR EAST AND EGYPT
================================================================
A cuneiform tablet was found at Sidon:

http://tinyurl.com/al6hg<http://tinyurl.com/al6hg> (Daily Star)

A small statue of Anahita was found in an excavation near
Prague (!):

http://www.radio.cz/en/article/70476<http://www.radio.cz/en/article/70476>

A mummy has been found in a sarcophagus in Palmyra (!):

http://en.rian.ru/world/20050907/41327150.html<http://en.rian.ru/world/20050907/41327150.html>

At the Bam excavations, they've found evidence of food storage:

http://www.chn.ir/en/news/?id=5554§ion=2<http://www.chn.ir/en/news/?id=5554§ion=2>

The Mesopotamians apparently made the first cocktail:

http://tinyurl.com/9nc3n<http://tinyurl.com/9nc3n> (AGI)

The latest on the 'David's Palace' debate:

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=622357<http://wwwhaaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=622357>

A press release calling for the world community to step in and
save the remains of Pasargadae from rising dam waters:

http://tinyurl.com/ab99v<http://tinyurl.com/ab99v>

but cf:

http://tinyurl.com/73jpg<http://tinyurl.com/73jpg> (Paleojudaica)

Lots of previews/hype about the opening of that Persian
exhibition at the British Museum:

http://tinyurl.com/79oty<http://tinyurl.com/79oty> (Guardian)
http://tinyurl.com/cd7x6<http://tinyurl.com/cd7x6> (IranMania)
http://tinyurl.com/8e8au<http://tinyurl.com/8e8au> (nice video report from Channel 4)
http://tinyurl.com/b453f<http://tinyurl.com/b453f> (Reuters)
http://www.iranian.ws/iran_news/publish/article_9483.shtml<http://www.iranian.ws/iran_news/publish/article_9483.shtml>
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,6903,1566998,00.html<http://observer.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,6903,1566998,00.html>

.. official site:

http://www.thebritishmuseum.ac.uk/persia/index.html<http://www.thebritishmuseum.ac.uk/persia/index.html>

.. slideshow:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/4223246.stm<http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/4223246.stm>

We're getting some details on what's in that 'lost' collection
of Egyptian artifacts recently rediscovered in China:

http://english.pravda.ru/main/18/90/363/16113_cleopatra.html<http://english.pravda.ru/main/18/90/363/16113_cleopatra.html>

An 'interesting' dig at Qumran:

http://tinyurl.com/b3sn5<http://tinyurl.com/b3sn5> (Plainview Daily Herald)

A feature on the Theban Mapping Project:

http://www.christiansciencemonitor.com/2005/0907/p25s01-stct.html<http://www.christiansciencemonitor.com/2005/0907/p25s01-stct.html>

.. and the website itself:

http://www.thebanmappingproject.com/<http://www.thebanmappingproject.com/>

Some interesting stuff about the Temple of Karnak:

http://www.bangornews.com/news/templates/?a=119407<http://www.bangornews.com/news/templates/?a=119407>

UPenn archaeologists are returning to Iran after 26 years:

http://tinyurl.com/bdm5j<http://tinyurl.com/bdm5j> (Daily Pennsylvanian)

UNESCO is trying to get Israelis and Palestinians to cooperate
in regards to ancient monuments:

http://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/article.asp?idart=11868<http://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/article.asp?idart=11868>

Stephen Vicchio, "The Image of Ayyub (Job) in the Qu�ran
and Later Islam":

http://www.bibleinterp.com/articles/Vicchio_Image_Ayyub.htm<http://www.bibleinterp.com/articles/Vicchio_Image_Ayyub.htm>

Exhibition ... Early Writing in Egypt and Mesopotamia:

http://tinyurl.com/8evvz<http://tinyurl.com/8evvz> (Age)

Exhibition ... The Art of Medicine in Ancient Egypt:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/10/nyregion/10papyrus.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/10/nyregion/10papyrus.html>
(nice slide show)
http://tinyurl.com/7gvpn<http://tinyurl.com/7gvpn> (Yahoo)
http://tinyurl.com/exms6<http://tinyurl.com/exms6> (Forbes ... same)

Review of *The Persian Gulf in Ancient Maps*:

http://www.chn.ir/en/news/?id=5559§ion=2<http://www.chn.ir/en/news/?id=5559§ion=2>

Review of Tom Holland, *Persian Fire*:

http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/books/reviews/article310460.ece<http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/books/reviews/article310460.ece>
http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/books/reviews/article309582.ece<http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/books/reviews/article309582.ece>
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,923-1760451,00.html<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,923-1760451,00.html>
http://books.guardian.co.uk/reviews/history/0,6121,1566336,00.html<http://books.guardian.co.uk/reviews/history/0,6121,1566336,00.html>

Review of Bruce Feiler, *Where God Was Born: A Journey by Land
to the Roots of Religion.*:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/11/books/review/11swift.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/11/books/review/11swift.html>

Cyrus as a model for the US?:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,5673,1564038,00.html<http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,5673,1564038,00.html>

Egyptology News Blog:

http://egyptology.blogspot.com/<http://egyptology.blogspot.com/>
================================================================
ANCIENT GREECE AND ROME (AND CLASSICS)
================================================================
Toscana Oggi reports (in Italian) on the discovery of an
Etruscan necropolis at Cortona

http://www.toscanaoggi.it/news.asp?IDNews=5092&IDCategoria=1<http://www.toscanaoggi.it/news.asp?IDNews=5092&IDCategoria=1>

A Christian "pulpit" has been found at Peperikon:

http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=52239<http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=52239>

Another piece on the brickworks of the Domitii:

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=1911432005<http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=1911432005>

Haven't had a facial reconstruction in a while ... the latest
is on Leasowe Man:

http://tinyurl.com/dhfur<http://tinyurl.com/dhfur> (icLiverpool)

A Roman farm in Sedgeford:

http://tinyurl.com/djwmg<http://tinyurl.com/djwmg> (Lynn News)

Bill Wyman's a metal detectorist too:

http://tinyurl.com/9kkrq<http://tinyurl.com/9kkrq> (EADT)

Brief item on the discovery of a Roman temple in Syria:

http://tinyurl.com/dto8s<http://tinyurl.com/dto8s> (Sana)

Very vague item about an "ancient medallion" being unearthed
in Bulgaria:

http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=52139<http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=52139>

Stephen Miller is still on the lecture circuit:

http://www.fresnostatenews.com/2005/09/0908conleylecture.htm<http://www.fresnostatenews.com/2005/09/0908conleylecture.htm>

Chatty piece on UND's survey (?) of a site near Larnaca:

http://tinyurl.com/bgx92<http://tinyurl.com/bgx92> (Blairsville Dispatch)

Repeat of that story on the hoard of Roman statuary from
Cyrene:

http://www.theartnewspaper.com/archaeology/archeology.asp<http://www.theartnewspaper.com/archaeology/archeology.asp>

Robocop and Rome:

http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/343334p-292761c.html<http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/343334p-292761c.html>

A press release which seems to be a touristy thing on the
Necromanteion:

http://tinyurl.com/e4lm9<http://tinyurl.com/e4lm9>
cf: http://www.vancourier.com/issues05/091105/travel.html<http://www.vancourier.com/issues05/091105/travel.html>

Exhibition ... Mirror of Memory: Imagining Roman Antiquity in
19th Century Photography:

http://tinyurl.com/eyfbt<http://tinyurl.com/eyfbt> (Art Daily)

ClassCon in a piece about CSU:

http://tinyurl.com/cmemx<http://tinyurl.com/cmemx> (Cleveland Plain Dealer)

Jane Ellen Harrison was one of the ODNB lives of the week:

http://www.oxforddnb.com/public/lotw/3.html<http://www.oxforddnb.com/public/lotw/3.html> (you may have
to go back to the lotw main page to find it)

Interesting interview with Ridley Scott about the new Gladiator
release:

http://www.dvdactu.be/newsdetails.php?id=2626<http://www.dvdactu.be/newsdetails.php?id=2626>

Reviews keep trickling in about HBO's Rome:

http://tinyurl.com/dflot<http://tinyurl.com/dflot>

Review of Tom Holland, *Persian Fire*:

http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/books/reviews/article310460.ece<http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/books/reviews/article310460.ece>
http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/books/reviews/article309582.ece<http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/books/reviews/article309582.ece>
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,923-1760451,00.html<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,923-1760451,00.html>
http://books.guardian.co.uk/reviews/history/0,6121,1566336,00.html<http://books.guardian.co.uk/reviews/history/0,6121,1566336,00.html>

Review of Dan Simmons, *Olympos* (fiction):

http://tinyurl.com/daspq<http://tinyurl.com/daspq> (Guardian)

Review of Richard Hingley, *Globalizing Roman Culture: Unity,
Diversity, and Empire*:

http://www.classics.und.ac.za/reviews/06-13hin.htm<http://www.classics.und.ac.za/reviews/06-13hin.htm>

Review of a couple of books on the fall of the Roman Empire:

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/GI07Ak05.html<http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/GI07Ak05.html>

Recent reviews from Aestimatio:

http://www.ircps.org/publications/aestimatio/rreviews.htm<http://www.ircps.org/publications/aestimatio/rreviews.htm>

Recent reviews from BMCR:

http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/recent.html<http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/recent.html>

Recent reviews from Scholia:

http://www.classics.und.ac.za/reviews/2006.htm<http://www.classics.und.acza/reviews/2006.htm>

Cyrus as a model for the US?:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,5673,1564038,00.html<http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,5673,1564038,00.html>

An attack on Victor Davis Hanson by someone writing under a
pseudonym:

http://www.counterpunch.org/werther09072005.html<http://www.counterpunch.org/werther09072005.html>

Visit our blog:

http://www.atrium-media.com/rogueclassicism<http://www.atrium-media.com/rogueclassicism>
================================================================
EUROPE AND THE UK (+ Ireland)
================================================================
More on that Viking hoard find made by a couple of kids in
Norway:

http://tinyurl.com/99auw<http://tinyurl.com/99auw> (Guardian)

Searching for a lost settlement in Nottingham:

http://tinyurl.com/b6cer<http://tinyurl.com/b6cer> (BBC)

Assorted Medieval finds at Rushen Abbey:

http://www.manx.net/default.asp?id=18&articleid=4990<http://www.manx.net/default.asp?id=18&articleid=4990>

A statue of the Persian goddess Anahita was excavated near
Prague:

http://www.radio.cz/en/article/70476<http://www.radio.cz/en/article/70476>

A three-fingered glove was recently found in Flanders:

http://www.aalst.be/hopmarkt/default.asp?rubriek=153<http://www.aalst.be/hopmarkt/default.asp?rubriek=153> (Dutch)

Whittington has a somewhat tenuous 'grail connection' it might
want to exploit:

http://tinyurl.com/82vvu<http://tinyurl.com/82vvu> (Ham and High)

Wessex Archaeology's events Blog:

http://events.wessexarch.co.uk/<http://events.wessexarch.co.uk/>

Archaeology in Europe Blog:

http://www.archaeology.eu.com/weblog/index.html<http://www.archaeology.eucom/weblog/index.html>
================================================================
ASIA AND THE SOUTH PACIFIC
================================================================
An 8000 b.p. fishing boat from China:

http://tinyurl.com/7qgrq<http://tinyurl.com/7qgrq> (Chosun)

New Zealand Archaeology eNews:

http://www.nzarchaeology.org/netsubnews.htm<http://www.nzarchaeology.org/netsubnews.htm>
================================================================
NORTH AMERICA
================================================================
Another piece on Polynesians making it to California:

http://tinyurl.com/clp39<http://tinyurl.com/clp39> (LAT)

Assorted prehistoric artifacts were discovered during work
prior to construction of the Clifton Park library:

http://tinyurl.com/92b5b<http://tinyurl.com/92b5b> (Times Union)

Interesting item on preservation of assorted papers associated
with Benedict Arnold:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/08/nyregion/08archive.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/08/nyregion/08archive.html>

A survey's afoot in anticipation of park construction in NC:

http://tinyurl.com/bhpzv<http://tinyurl.com/bhpzv> (Daily Advance)

Searching for clues about the beginnings of the Seminole
people:

http://tinyurl.com/c5w5g<http://tinyurl.com/c5w5g> (SP Times)

A Gold Rush era ship is being excavated in San Francisco:

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9239070/<http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9239070/>
http://tinyurl.com/9nswa<http://tinyurl.com/9nswa> (Chronicle)

Some mystery burials in Peterborough (Ontario):

http://www.mykawartha.com/ka/news/home/story/3012644p-3492824c.html<http://www.mykawartha.com/ka/news/home/story/3012644p-3492824c.html>

The Boston Globe has an interesting feature on 'native ingenuity':

http://tinyurl.com/bw7rd<http://tinyurl.com/bw7rd>

The latest video on the Archaeology Channel is about prehistoric
life in Arizona:

http://www.archaeologychannel.org/<http://www.archaeologychannel.org/>

The affect Katrina had on various sites/artifacts in Mississippi:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/08/garden/08history.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/08/garden/08history.html>

Exhibition ... Landon Americana collection:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/09/arts/design/09anti.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/09/arts/design/09anti.html>

Exhibition ... Slavery in New York:

http://slaveryinnewyork.org<http://slaveryinnewyork.org/>

Review of Mark Caldwell, *New York Night: The Mystique and Its
History*:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/05/books/05grim.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/05/books/05grim.html>

Review of Gary Wills, *Henry Adams and the Making of America*:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/11/books/review/11lingeman.html<http://wwwnytimes.com/2005/09/11/books/review/11lingeman.html>

Review of E. L. Doctorow, *The March* (fiction ... review by
John Updike):

http://tinyurl.com/behcg<http://tinyurl.com/behcg> (New Yorker)
================================================================
CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA
================================================================
Grand Saposoa is falling victim to tomb raiders:

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9233051/<http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9233051/>
http://www.showmenews.com/2005/Sep/20050907News018.asp<http://www.showmenews.com/2005/Sep/20050907News018.asp>
http://tinyurl.com/9mvv9<http://tinyurl.com/9mvv9> (AP)
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=1099584<http://abcnewsgo.com/International/wireStory?id=1099584>

Touristy thing on the Yucatan peninsula:

http://tinyurl.com/acdu5<http://tinyurl.com/acdu5> (Seattle Times)
================================================================
OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST
================================================================
That Bronze Age style reed boat which was to retrace the ancient
trade route to India sank this week:

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9269279/<http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9269279/>
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9229774/<http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9229774/>
http://tinyurl.com/ag29y<http://tinyurl.com/ag29y> (Telegraph)
http://tinyurl.com/covdm<http://tinyurl.com/covdm> (SMH)
http://tinyurl.com/dr9d8<http://tinyurl.com/dr9d8>

The Guardian has a piece on 'the academic novel':

http://books.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,12084,1566401,00.html<http://books.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,12084,1566401,00.html>

Interesting ad campaign in Italy to get Italians to appreciate
their artistic heritage:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/10/arts/design/10heri.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/10/arts/design/10heri.html>

In the wake of Katrina, the New York Times had a piece on
assorted other cities/monuments that had 'vanished':

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/06/science/06lost.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/06/science/06lost.html>

A possible previously-unknown Munch has been identified in
Germany:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/07/arts/07arts.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/07/arts/07arts.html> (2nd item)

What's Britain's greatest painting?:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/arts/4214824.stm<http://news.bbcco.uk/1/hi/entertainment/arts/4214824.stm>

Touristy thing on Salonika:

http://tinyurl.com/cc8eo<http://tinyurl.com/cc8eo> (Jewish Week)

.. and one on Capri:

http://www.startribune.com/stories/1513/5604378.html<http://www.startribune.com/stories/1513/5604378.html>

.. and Granada

The British Library has put some Renaissance Festival books
online:

http://www.bl.uk/treasures/festivalbooks/homepage.html<http://www.bl.uk/treasures/festivalbooks/homepage.html>

Salon has an interesting item on 'fringe' archaeology and how
it sometimes gets in the way of 'real' archaeology:

http://tinyurl.com/97343<http://tinyurl.com/97343>

Exhibition ... Fra Angelico:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/11/arts/design/11kimm.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/11/arts/design/11kimm.html>

Review of Wendy Moore, *The Knife Man: The Extraordinary Life
and Times of John Hunter, Father of Modern Surgery.*:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/11/books/review/11roach.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/11/books/review/11roach.html>

The UK government has launched consultations into determining
what monuments must be saved 'at all costs' in the event of a
war or whatever:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1564187,00.html<http://wwwguardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1564187,00.html>

A mostly-accurate overview of the history of the Caesarean
section:

http://tinyurl.com/bmrvb<http://tinyurl.com/bmrvb> (Kuensel Online)
================================================================
GENERAL MAGAZINES AND JOURNALS
================================================================
Apollo (toc only):

http://www.apollo-magazine.com/index.php<http://www.apollo-magazine.com/index.php>

About.com Archaeology:

http://archaeology.about.com/<http://archaeology.about.com/>

Archaeoblog:

http://archaeoblog.blogspot.com/<http://archaeoblog.blogspot.com/>
================================================================
CRIME BEAT
================================================================
High tech looting of Greek shipwrecks:

http://tinyurl.com/a5xe9<http://tinyurl.com/a5xe9> (Boston Globe)

There's quite a dispute brewing between archaeologists and
government types over legislation which would ban the import of
antiquities from Italy:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/09/politics/09antiquities.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/09/politics/09antiquities.html>

Grand Saposoa is falling victim to tomb raiders:

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9233051/<http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9233051/>
http://www.showmenews.com/2005/Sep/20050907News018.asp<http://www.showmenews.com/2005/Sep/20050907News018.asp>

UNESCO claims that trafficking in 'cultural property' is second
only to the narcotics trade:

http://tinyurl.com/ahz5k<http://tinyurl.com/ahz5k> (Navhind Times)

Latest developments in the Marion True case:

http://tinyurl.com/crqen<http://tinyurl.com/crqen> (SMH)

Financial Times has an interesting feature on Maguire Gibson
and the current 'state of affairs' in Iraq:

http://tinyurl.com/7omju<http://tinyurl.com/7omju>
================================================================
NUMISMATICA
================================================================
Somewhat strange (it seems) dispute over ownership of an
Indian coin collection:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4204228.stm<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4204228.stm>

There's a Sassanid coin exhibition accompanying that British
Museum Persian exhibition:

http://www.chn.ir/en/news/?id=5582§ion=2<http://www.chn.ir/en/news/?id=5582§ion=2>

A professor visiting Pergamon found a 500 b.p. Ottoman Empire
coin:

http://tinyurl.com/aeqtn<http://tinyurl.com/aeqtn> (AScribe)

Interesting history of Scottish bank notes, which are now
threatened, apparently:

http://heritage.scotsman.com/ingenuity.cfm?id=1876402005<http://heritage.scotsman.com/ingenuity.cfm?id=1876402005>

An 1854 gold eagle is coming up for auction:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/06/national/06coin.html<http://www.nytimescom/2005/09/06/national/06coin.html>
================================================================
EXHIBITIONS, AUCTIONS, AND MUSEUM-RELATED
================================================================
The El Paso Archaeological Society and the El Paso Museum are
scrapping:

http://tinyurl.com/bu8e7<http://tinyurl.com/bu8e7> (El Paso Times)

The National Museum of Scotland is opening its 'unseen collection'
to the public:

http://news.scotsman.com/arts.cfm?id=1920422005<http://news.scotsman.com/arts.cfm?id=1920422005>

Changes are going on at the Field Museum:

http://tinyurl.com/7zhgc<http://tinyurl.com/7zhgc> (Chicago Tribune)

Financial Times has a nice feature on the Art Institute of
Chicago:

http://tinyurl.com/dcmvo<http://tinyurl.com/dcmvo>

For info on the status of Katrina-affected museums:

http://www.aam-us.org/aamlatest/news/HurricaneFirstReports.cfm<http://wwwaam-us.org/aamlatest/news/HurricaneFirstReports.cfm>

London and Beijing are going to exchange some archaeological
treasures:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1563323,00.html<http://wwwguardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1563323,00.html>
================================================================
PERFORMANCES AND THEATRE-RELATED
================================================================
A Kiss from Alexander:

http://tinyurl.com/8f5dt<http://tinyurl.com/8f5dt>

Julius Caesar:

http://tinyurl.com/8plfy<http://tinyurl.com/8plfy>

Iphigenia at Aulis:

http://www.sltrib.com/arts/ci_3018286<http://www.sltrib.com/arts/ci_3018286>
================================================================
OBITUARIES
================================================================
R.W. Funk (creator of the Jesus Seminar):

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/10/national/10funk.html<http://www.nytimescom/2005/09/10/national/10funk.html>
================================================================
PODCASTS
================================================================
Stone Pages Archaeology News:

http://news.stonepages.com/<http://news.stonepages.com/>

Archaeologica Audio News:

http://www.archaeologychannel.org/AudioNews.asp<http://www.archaeologychannel.org/AudioNews.asp>
================================================================
EXPLORATOR is a weekly newsletter representing the fruits of
the labours of 'media research division' of The Atrium. Various
on-line news and magazine sources are scoured for news of the
ancient world (broadly construed: practically anything relating
to archaeology or history prior to about 1700 or so is fair
game) and every Sunday they are delivered to your mailbox free of
charge!
================================================================
Useful Addresses
================================================================
Past issues of Explorator are available on the web at Classics
Central:

http://s9.invisionfree.com/Classics_Central/<http://s9.invisionfree.com/Classics_Central/>

To subscribe to Explorator, send a blank email message to:

Explorator-subscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Explorator-subscribe@yahoogroups.com>

To unsubscribe, send a blank email message to:

Explorator-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Explorator-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>

To send a 'heads up' to the editor or contact him for other
reasons, reply to this message.





================================================================
Explorator is Copyright (c) 2005 David Meadows. Feel free to
distribute these listings via email to your pals, students,
teachers, etc., but please include this copyright notice. These
links are not to be posted to any website by any means (whether
by direct posting or snagging from a usenet group or some other
email source) without my express written permission. I think it
is only right that I be made aware of public fora which are
making use of content gathered in Explorator. Thanks!
================================================================









[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37685 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: the Legions are Lost
Salve Romans FYIvaleTiberius Galerius Paulinus "Deep in the forest, the legions are lost.
The clamour of armour and brass,
the joyful perfection of youth and geometry,
of order and open space, is muffled beneath
the obscure chaos of indifferent branches
and enveloping gloom: deep in the forest,
the legions are lost.

How young we were,
and glorious, when in the full sun of
Roman days, we sought an Empire of Reason,
rather than a reason for Empire.
How old we are now, with arms too leaden
to embrace either a man or an ideal.

The forest is inscrutable, and whispers
the foreign words of wind through insensible leaves.
An occasional messenger, lame and thin,
brings news of battles, but in another place,
sometime already past.

His eyes are filled
with shadows. He says little we do not already
know: deep in the forest, the legions are lost."


© All contents copyright the author<mailto:literatus@...>, unless otherwise noted.
Site design by Sinister Designs<http://www.sinister-designs.com/design/index.html>,
server powered by e-smith<http://www.esmith.com/>.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37686 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: German nationhood and Arminius
Salve Romans

It is interesting to note that Gaul, a long time part of the Roman world
attained nationhood a great deal earlier than Germania did even with the treachery of Arminius.

German nationhood came about nearly 1000 AFTER that of France (Gaul)

Might it have come about earlier if Germania had become a part of the Roman world?

A very interesting question.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

----- Original Message -----
From: gaiusequitiuscato<mailto:mlcinnyc@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 2:37 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Battle of the Teutoburg Forest


OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Ye gods and little fishes! How could I have missed nthis one?!?!
Probably a mixture of fatigue and a desire to block such a horrible
event from my memory :-) Anyways, here it is:

"Scarcely had Tiberius put the finishing touch upon the Pannonian and
Dalmatian war when, within five days of the completion of this task,
dispatches from Germania brought the baleful news of the death of
Varus, and of the slaughter of three legions, of as many divisions of
cavalry, and of six cohorts - as though fortune were granting us this
indulgence at least, that such a disaster should not be brought upon
us when our commander was occupied by other wars. The cause of this
defeat and the personality of the general require of me a brief
digression.

Varus Quintilius, descended from a famous rather than a high-born
family, was a man of mild character and of a quiet disposition,
somewhat slow in mind as he was in body, and more accustomed to the
leisure of the camp than to actual service in war. That he was no
despiser of money is demonstrated by his governorship of Syria: he
entered the rich province a poor man, but left it a rich man and the
province poor. When placed in charge of the army in Germania, he
entertained the notion that the Germans were a people who were men
only in limbs and voice, and that they, who could not be subdued by
the sword, could be soothed by the law. With this purpose in mind he
entered the heart of Germania as though he were going among a people
enjoying the blessings of peace, and sitting on his tribunal he wasted
the time of a summer campaign in holding court and observing the
proper details of legal procedure.

But the Germans, who with their great ferocity combine great craft, to
an extent scarcely credible to one who has had no experience with
them, and are a race to lying born, by trumping up a series of
fictitious lawsuits, now provoking one another to disputes, and now
expressing their gratitude that Roman justice was settling these
disputes, that their own barbarous nature was being softened down by
this new and hitherto unknown method, and that quarrels which were
usually settled by arms were now being ended by law, brought
Quintilius to such a complete degree of negligence, that he came to
look upon himself as a city praetor administering justice in the
forum, and not a general in command of an army in the heart of
Germania.

Thereupon appeared a young man of noble birth, brave in action and
alert in mind, possessing an intelligence quite beyond the ordinary
barbarian; he was, namely, Arminius, the son of Segimer, a prince of
that nation, and he showed in his countenance and in his eyes the fire
of the mind within. He had been associated with us constantly on
private campaigns, and had even attained the dignity of equestrian
rank. This young man made use of the negligence of the general as an
opportunity for treachery, sagaciously seeing that no one could be
more quickly overpowered than the man who feared nothing, and that the
most common beginning of disaster was a sense of security. At first,
then, he admitted but a few, later a large number, to a share in his
design; he told them, and convinced them too, that the Romans could be
crushed, added execution to resolve, and named a day for carrying out
the plot.

This was disclosed to Varus through Segestes, a loyal man of that race
and of illustrious name, who also demanded that the conspirators be
put in chains. But fate now dominated the plans of Varus and had
blindfolded the eyes of his mind. Indeed, it is usually the case that
heaven perverts the judgment of the man whose fortune it means to
reverse, and brings it to pass -and this is the wretched part of it-
that that which happens by chance seems to be deserved, and accident
passes over into culpability. And so Quintilius refused to believe the
story, and insisted upon judging the apparent friendship of the
Germans toward him by the standard of his merit. And, after this first
warning, there was no time left for a second.

The details of this terrible calamity, the heaviest that had befallen
the Romans on foreign soil since the disaster of Crassus in Parthia, I
shall endeavor to set forth, as others have done, in my larger work.
Here I can merely lament the disaster as a whole. An army unexcelled
in bravery, the first of Roman armies in discipline, in energy, and in
experience in the field, through the negligence of its general, the
perfidy of the enemy, and the unkindness of fortune was surrounded,
nor was as much opportunity as they had wished given to the soldiers
either of fighting or of extricating themselves, except against heavy
odds; nay, some were even heavily chastised for using the arms and
showing the spirit of Romans.

Hemmed in by forests and marshes and ambuscades, it was exterminated
almost to a man by the very enemy whom it had always slaughtered like
cattle, whose life or death had depended solely upon the wrath or the
pity of the Romans. The general had more courage to die than to fight,
for, following the example of his father and grandfather, he ran
himself through with his sword. Of the two prefects of the camp,
Lucius Eggius furnished a precedent as noble as that of Ceionius was
base, who, after the greater part of the army had perished, proposed
its surrender, preferring to die by torture at the hands of the enemy
than in battle." - Vellius Paterculus, The Roman Histories Book
II.117-120

Valete bene,

Cato


SOURCE




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37687 From: Lucius Iulius Auspex Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: SOMETHING MORE ABOUT TEUTOBURG FOREST BATTLE...
Saluete

Lucius Iulius Auspex omnibus s. d.

Did really the clades varina happened in the 9th of September of 9 a.c. In that case, by modern christian notation that date would numerically be 9-9-9, which is the inverted form of 666, the number of the beast. Very curious!

Valete

Lucius Iulius Auspex



Gaius Aemilius Papinianus <numerius2002@...> wrote:
Gaius Aemilius Papinianus omnibus salutem!

Scelestis Germanus Josef Victor von Scheffel anno 1847 conscripsit de
clade Variana (melodia musica utitur J. Gungli) carmen quod in
Germania omnis puer novit:

Als die Römer frech geworden,
Sim serim sim sim sim sim,
Zogen sie nach Deutschlands Norden,
Sim serim sim sim sim sim,
Vorne mit Trompetenschall,
Te rä tä tä tä te rä,
Ritt der Generalfeldmarschall,
Te rä tä tä tä te rä,
Herr Quintilius Varus,
Wau, wau, wau, wau, wau,
Herr Quintilius Varus,
|: Schnäde räng täng :|
Schnäde räng täng, de räng täng täng

2. In dem Teutoburger Walde,
Huh! Wie piff der Wind so kalte,
Raben folgen durch die Luft,
Und es war ein Moderduft,
Wie von Blut und Leichen,


3. Plötzlich aus des Waldes Duster
Brachen kampfhaft die Cherusker,
Mit Gott für Fürst und Vaterland
Stürtzen sie sich wutentbrannt
Auf die Legionen.


4. Weh, das ward ein großer Morden,
Sie schlugen die Kohorten,
Nur die röm'sche Reiterei
Rettete sich noch ins Frei',
Denn sie war zu Pferde.

5. O Quintili, armer Feldherr,
Dachtest du, daß so die Welt wär'?
Er geriet in einen Sumpf,
Verlor zwei Stiefel und einen Strumpf
Und blieb elend stecken.

6. Da sprach er voll Ärgernussen
Zum Centurio Titiussen:
Kam'rad, zeuch dein Schwert hervor
Und von hinten mich durchbor,
Da doch alles futsch ist.

7. In dem armen röm'schen Heere
Diente auch als volontäre
Scävola, ein Rechtskandidat,
Den man schnöd gefangen hat,
Wie die andern all.

8. Diesem ist es schlimm ergangen,
Eh daß man ihn aufgehangen,
Stach man ihm durch Zung und Herz,
Nagelte ihn hinterwärts
Auf sein corpus iuris.

9. Als die Waldschlacht war zu Ende,
Rieb Fürst Hermann sich die Hände,
Und um seinen Sieg zu weih'n,
Lud er die Cherusker ein
Zu 'nem großen Frühstück.

10. Hu, da gab's westfäl'schen Schinken,
Bier, soviel man wollte trinken;
Auch im Zechen blieb er Held,
Doch auch seine Frau Thusneld
Trank walkürenmäßig.

11. Nur in Rom war man nicht heiter,
Sondern kaufte Trauerkleider;
G'rade als beim Mittagsmahl
Augustus saß im Kaisersaal,
Kam die Trauerbotschaft.

12. Erst blieb ihm vor jähem Schrecken
Ein Stück Pfau im Halse stecken,
Dann geriet er außer sich
Und schrie: Varus, Fluch auf dich,
Redde legiones!

13. Sein deutscher Sklave, Schmidt geheißen,
Dacht': Ihn soll das Mäusle beißen,
Wenn er sie je wieder kriegt,
Denn wer einmal tot daliegt,
Wird nicht mehr lebendig.

14. Und zu Ehren der Geschichten
Tat ein Denkmal man errichten,
Deutschlands Kraft und Einigkeit
Kündet es jetzt weit und breit:
"Mögen sie nur kommen!"

---------
What a scoundrel! ;)


Pax vobiscum.






---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37688 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: German nationhood and Arminius
Salve Tiberi Galeri,

I checked a scenario out where Rome was successful in Germany. It is
quite interesting but at the same time I agree with QFM's point of
view about the impracticality of keeping that region centralized and
governable from Rome.

Here it is with the maps:

http://www.geocities.com/davidbofinger/rome.htm

Regards,

QLP



-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Timothy P. Gallagher"
<spqr753@m...> wrote:
> Salve Romans
>
> It is interesting to note that Gaul, a long time part of the Roman
world
> attained nationhood a great deal earlier than Germania did even
with the treachery of Arminius.
>
> German nationhood came about nearly 1000 AFTER that of France
(Gaul)
>
> Might it have come about earlier if Germania had become a part of
the Roman world?
>
> A very interesting question.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: gaiusequitiuscato<mailto:mlcinnyc@y...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 2:37 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Battle of the Teutoburg Forest
>
>
> OSD G. Equitius Cato
>
> Salvete omnes!
>
> Ye gods and little fishes! How could I have missed nthis
one?!?!
> Probably a mixture of fatigue and a desire to block such a
horrible
> event from my memory :-) Anyways, here it is:
>
> "Scarcely had Tiberius put the finishing touch upon the
Pannonian and
> Dalmatian war when, within five days of the completion of this
task,
> dispatches from Germania brought the baleful news of the death of
> Varus, and of the slaughter of three legions, of as many
divisions of
> cavalry, and of six cohorts - as though fortune were granting us
this
> indulgence at least, that such a disaster should not be brought
upon
> us when our commander was occupied by other wars. The cause of
this
> defeat and the personality of the general require of me a brief
> digression.
>
> Varus Quintilius, descended from a famous rather than a high-born
> family, was a man of mild character and of a quiet disposition,
> somewhat slow in mind as he was in body, and more accustomed to
the
> leisure of the camp than to actual service in war. That he was no
> despiser of money is demonstrated by his governorship of Syria:
he
> entered the rich province a poor man, but left it a rich man and
the
> province poor. When placed in charge of the army in Germania, he
> entertained the notion that the Germans were a people who were
men
> only in limbs and voice, and that they, who could not be subdued
by
> the sword, could be soothed by the law. With this purpose in
mind he
> entered the heart of Germania as though he were going among a
people
> enjoying the blessings of peace, and sitting on his tribunal he
wasted
> the time of a summer campaign in holding court and observing the
> proper details of legal procedure.
>
> But the Germans, who with their great ferocity combine great
craft, to
> an extent scarcely credible to one who has had no experience with
> them, and are a race to lying born, by trumping up a series of
> fictitious lawsuits, now provoking one another to disputes, and
now
> expressing their gratitude that Roman justice was settling these
> disputes, that their own barbarous nature was being softened
down by
> this new and hitherto unknown method, and that quarrels which
were
> usually settled by arms were now being ended by law, brought
> Quintilius to such a complete degree of negligence, that he came
to
> look upon himself as a city praetor administering justice in the
> forum, and not a general in command of an army in the heart of
> Germania.
>
> Thereupon appeared a young man of noble birth, brave in action
and
> alert in mind, possessing an intelligence quite beyond the
ordinary
> barbarian; he was, namely, Arminius, the son of Segimer, a
prince of
> that nation, and he showed in his countenance and in his eyes
the fire
> of the mind within. He had been associated with us constantly on
> private campaigns, and had even attained the dignity of
equestrian
> rank. This young man made use of the negligence of the general
as an
> opportunity for treachery, sagaciously seeing that no one could
be
> more quickly overpowered than the man who feared nothing, and
that the
> most common beginning of disaster was a sense of security. At
first,
> then, he admitted but a few, later a large number, to a share in
his
> design; he told them, and convinced them too, that the Romans
could be
> crushed, added execution to resolve, and named a day for
carrying out
> the plot.
>
> This was disclosed to Varus through Segestes, a loyal man of
that race
> and of illustrious name, who also demanded that the conspirators
be
> put in chains. But fate now dominated the plans of Varus and had
> blindfolded the eyes of his mind. Indeed, it is usually the case
that
> heaven perverts the judgment of the man whose fortune it means to
> reverse, and brings it to pass -and this is the wretched part of
it-
> that that which happens by chance seems to be deserved, and
accident
> passes over into culpability. And so Quintilius refused to
believe the
> story, and insisted upon judging the apparent friendship of the
> Germans toward him by the standard of his merit. And, after this
first
> warning, there was no time left for a second.
>
> The details of this terrible calamity, the heaviest that had
befallen
> the Romans on foreign soil since the disaster of Crassus in
Parthia, I
> shall endeavor to set forth, as others have done, in my larger
work.
> Here I can merely lament the disaster as a whole. An army
unexcelled
> in bravery, the first of Roman armies in discipline, in energy,
and in
> experience in the field, through the negligence of its general,
the
> perfidy of the enemy, and the unkindness of fortune was
surrounded,
> nor was as much opportunity as they had wished given to the
soldiers
> either of fighting or of extricating themselves, except against
heavy
> odds; nay, some were even heavily chastised for using the arms
and
> showing the spirit of Romans.
>
> Hemmed in by forests and marshes and ambuscades, it was
exterminated
> almost to a man by the very enemy whom it had always slaughtered
like
> cattle, whose life or death had depended solely upon the wrath
or the
> pity of the Romans. The general had more courage to die than to
fight,
> for, following the example of his father and grandfather, he ran
> himself through with his sword. Of the two prefects of the camp,
> Lucius Eggius furnished a precedent as noble as that of Ceionius
was
> base, who, after the greater part of the army had perished,
proposed
> its surrender, preferring to die by torture at the hands of the
enemy
> than in battle." - Vellius Paterculus, The Roman Histories Book
> II.117-120
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
>
> SOURCE
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-
Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-
unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37690 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: a.d. III Id. Sept.
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Today is ante diem III Idus Septembris; the day is comitialis.

"A long silence followed. The best and bravest of the Romans made no
sign; they felt ashamed of appearing to decline the challenge, and yet
they were reluctant to expose themselves to such terrible danger.
Thereupon T. Manlius, the youth who had protected his father from the
persecution of the tribune, left his post and went to the Dictator.`
Without your orders, General,' he said, 'I will never leave my post to
fight, no, not even if I saw that victory was certain ; but if you
give me permission I want to show that monster as he stalks so proudly
in front of their lines that I am a scion of that family which hurled
the troop of Gauls from the Tarpeian rock.' Then the Dictator:
`Success to your courage, T. Manlius, and to your affection for your
father and your fatherland . Go, and with the help of the gods show
that the name of Rome is invincible.' Then his comrades fastened on
his armour; he took an infantry shield and a Spanish sword as better
adapted for close fighting; thus armed and equipped they led him for-
ward against the Gaul, who was exulting in his brute strength, and
even--the ancients thought this worth recording--putting his tongue
out in derision. They retired to their posts and the two armed
champions were left alone in the midst, more after the manner of a
scene on the stage than under the conditions of serious war, and to
those who judged by appearances, by no means equally matched. The one
was a creature of enormous bulk, resplendent in a many-coloured coat
and wearing painted and gilded armour; the other a man of average
height, and his arms, useful rather than ornamental, gave him quite an
ordinary appearance. There was no singing of war-songs, no prancing
about, no silly brandishing of weapons. With a breast full of courage
and silent wrath Manlius reserved all his ferocity for the actual
moment of conflict. When they had taken their stand between the two
armies, while so many hearts around them were in suspense between hope
and fear, the Gaul, like a great over- hanging mass, held out his
shield on his left arm to meet his adversary's blows and aimed a
tremendous cut downwards with his sword. The Roman evaded the blow,
and pushing aside the bottom of the Gaul's shield with his own, he
slipped under it close up to the Gaul, too near for him to get at him
with his sword. Then turning the point of his blade upwards, he gave
two rapid thrusts in succession and stabbed the Gaul in the belly and
the groin, laying his enemy prostrate over a large extent of ground.
He left the body of his fallen foe undespoiled with the exception of
his chain, which though smeared with blood he placed round his own
neck. Astonishment and fear kept the Gauls motionless; the Romans ran
eagerly forward from their lines to meet their warrior, and amidst
cheers and con- gratulations they conducted him to the Dictator. In
the doggerel verses which they extemporised in his honour they called
him Torquatus ("adorned with a chain"), and this soubriquet became for
his posterity a proud family name. The Dictator gave him a golden
crown, and before the whole army alluded to his victory in terms of
the highest praise." - Livy, History of Rome 7.10


On this day in A.D. 2001, 3,030 people were killed in the largest act
of terrorism in United States history in attacks on the Pentagon in
Washington, D.C. and the World Trade Center in New York City. Requiem
aeterna dona eis Domine.

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37691 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Does anyone know where is Senator C. Marius Merullus?
Salvete Quirites!

I would like to ask you, People of Nove Roma, to help me in a certain case.

I am seeking Senator C. Merullus who is the owner of mailig list Nova Roma Vizantia. This ML is for Europe and Asia and the whole East.

I would like to undertake the moderation of that currently dead ML and restore to life because Europe and particulary the not-English-speaker Europe would need an own ML.

Illustris Senator Merullus has promised that help us in this matter -- but then he disappeared.

You can ask the question why not create simply a new ML?

Merullus' ML is created in 1999 and, with respect, I wouldn' like to change it with a new, "a younger"... This ML has a past, old members with lots of messages of great value in the archive and if we decide to leave it we decide to delete and ignore the work and history of seven years... If there is a chance to conserve this ML I want it. However if Merullus won't anwser my letter, I must create a new one.

Please, if anybody knows how can I communicate with Senator C. Marius Merullus to help me. If there is somebody who used to communicate with Merullus, please tell him that I need his help!

THANK YOU? QUIRITES!





Cnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
Accensus Consulis Fr. Apuli Caesaris
Scriba Aedilis Curulis L. Iuli Sullae
Scriba Interpres Linguae Latinae Senior Tulliae Scholasticae
Scriba Magistri Araneari Iunior Q. Cassi Calvi

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37692 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: the Legions are Lost
Give Satan an inch and hed be a ruler.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <spqr753@...> wrote:
> Salve Romans FYIvaleTiberius Galerius Paulinus
"Deep in the forest, the le
> gions are lost.
> The clamour of armour and brass,
> the joyful perfection of youth and geometry,
> of order and open space, is muffled beneath
> the obscure chaos of indifferent branches
> and enveloping gloom: deep in the forest,
> the legions are lost.
>
> How young we were,
> and glorious, when in the full sun of
> Roman days, we sought an Empire of Reason,
> rather than a reason for Empire.
> How old we are now, with arms too leaden
> to embrace either a man or an ideal.
>
> The forest is inscrutable, and whispers
> the foreign words of wind through insensible leaves.
> An occasional messenger, lame and thin,
> brings news of battles, but in another place,
> sometime already past.
>
> His eyes are filled
> with shadows. He says little we do not already
> know: deep in the forest, the legions are lost."
>
>
> © All contents copyright the
author<mailto:literatus@...
> >, unless otherwise noted.
> Site design by Sinister
Designs<http://www.sinister-designs.com/design/inde
> x.html>,
> server powered by e-smith<http://www.esmith.com/>.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






______________________________________________________
Yahoo! for Good
Watch the Hurricane Katrina Shelter From The Storm concert
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/shelter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37693 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: SOMETHING MORE ABOUT TEUTOBURG FOREST BATTLE...
I tussled todayw/ a kid wearing a Lenin t-shirt with
hammer & sickle.He resisted evacuation from his
home.If we were CCCP troops hed be dead.He said
whatever
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mjk@...>
wrote:
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Good article! What I note is that we are all
products of various
> times and eras. I remember people who were
considered terrorists
> around the world when I was a youngster also later
became national
> heroes, especially after decolonization and the rise
of the 60's
> open, liberal movements. This covered everyone from
Kenyetta to Che
> Guevera. A well known personality of 19th century
Canada, Louis
> Reil, a highly educated metis leader who led the
North West
> Rebellion and later hanged was a traitor when I was
young but now is
> exhonorated as a great leader and human right
activist who was
> unjustly put to death. I was just reading an article
on the history
> of piracy and the author pointed out that these
people were not a
> particularily pleasant lot and he was concerned that
the Robin Hood
> impression we are given of them today is somewhat
akin to making Ben
> Laden a hero and champion of the people a few
hundred years from now.
>
> Rome did a lot for Europe and did much to advance
western
> civilization. The in thing today is this evil empire
concept which I
> find funny at times since empires, while certainly
have been wrong
> on some of their policies or decsions, still brought
a lot of
> positive benifits to their colonies or scattered
warring disunited
> tribes. Think of the development of Roman roads to
the British
> railways around the world and their infrastructures
as one example.
>
> Now one gripe I have about Arminius' character was
that he profited
> by being a turn coat. He took the " Saxon shilling "
as the Irish
> rebel song says of others, collaborated as an
officer in the Roman
> army which ultimately lead to his victory in the
forest since he
> knew the Roman tactics.
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Lanius Paulinus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M•IVL•SEVERVS
> <marcusiuliusseverus@l...> wrote:
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > I thought this piece of information could be of
some interest,
> specially because offers some clues for later
historical events...
> >
> > The name of the Teutoburg Forest in Germany will
forever be
> connected to one of the most famous battles from
ancient history,
> the clades Variana, the defeat of the Roman general
Varus. In
> September 9 CE, a coalition of Germanic tribes, led
by a nobleman
> named Arminius, defeated the Seventeenth,
Eighteenth, and Nineteenth
> legions and forced their commander Publius
Quintilius Varus to
> commit suicide. The result of the battle was that
Germania remained
> independent and was never included in the Roman
empire.
> > In the nineteenth century, the battle became a
powerful national
> symbol. In 1806, the French army of Napoleon
Bonaparte decisively
> beat the armies of the German states. The
humiliation was too big
> for the Germans, who started to look to the battle
in the Teutoburg
> Forest as their finest hour. As Napoleon spoke a
romanic language
> and presented himself as a Roman emperor, it was
easy for the
> Germans to remind each other that they had once
before defeated the
> welschen Erbfeind - an untranslatable expression
that refers to the
> Latin speaking archenemies of Germany. The Teutoburg
Forest became
> the symbol of the eternal opposition between the
overcivilised and
> decadent Latin and the creative and vital Germanic
people, between
> old France and new Germany.
> > To make the connection between the noble savages
of Antiquity and
> the modern nation closer, the Germanic war leader
whose name had
> been rendered by the Romans as Arminius was referred
to by his
> (presumed) real Germanic name: Hermann. Already
famous in the days
> of Martin Luther, who invented the name Hermann, the
Germanic leader
> became a very popular hero in nineteenth-century and
early twentieth-
> century Germany, and a symbol of national unity that
could be used
> on almost any occasion. For example, in 1809, the
romantic poet
> Heinrich von Kleist (1777-1811) wrote a play called
Die
> Hermannsschlacht, to inspire the Germans to a natio
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37694 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: a.d. III Id. Sept.
SALVE CATO ET SALVETE !

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
> OSD G. Equitius Cato
> Salvete omnes!
> Today is ante diem III Idus Septembris; the day is comitialis.

<<< On this day in A.D. 2001, 3,030 people were killed in the largest
act of terrorism in United States history in attacks on the Pentagon in
Washington, D.C. and the World Trade Center in New York City. Requiem
aeterna dona eis Domine.>>>

That day is in our memory like the one when the cowardice won in front
of the inocent peoples.
Our condolence.


provincia dacia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37695 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: SOMETHING MORE ABOUT TEUTOBURG FOREST BATTLE...
Salve,
Was CNN or FOX around? If so I'll look for you.
Quintus Servilius

On 9/11/05, raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@...> wrote:
>
> I tussled todayw/ a kid wearing a Lenin t-shirt with
> hammer & sickle.He resisted evacuation from his
> home.If we were CCCP troops hed be dead.He said
> whatever
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mjk@...>
> wrote:
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > Good article! What I note is that we are all
> products of various
> > times and eras. I remember people who were
> considered terrorists
> > around the world when I was a youngster also later
> became national
> > heroes, especially after decolonization and the rise
> of the 60's
> > open, liberal movements. This covered everyone from
> Kenyetta to Che
> > Guevera. A well known personality of 19th century
> Canada, Louis
> > Reil, a highly educated metis leader who led the
> North West
> > Rebellion and later hanged was a traitor when I was
> young but now is
> > exhonorated as a great leader and human right
> activist who was
> > unjustly put to death. I was just reading an article
> on the history
> > of piracy and the author pointed out that these
> people were not a
> > particularily pleasant lot and he was concerned that
> the Robin Hood
> > impression we are given of them today is somewhat
> akin to making Ben
> > Laden a hero and champion of the people a few
> hundred years from now.
> >
> > Rome did a lot for Europe and did much to advance
> western
> > civilization. The in thing today is this evil empire
> concept which I
> > find funny at times since empires, while certainly
> have been wrong
> > on some of their policies or decsions, still brought
> a lot of
> > positive benifits to their colonies or scattered
> warring disunited
> > tribes. Think of the development of Roman roads to
> the British
> > railways around the world and their infrastructures
> as one example.
> >
> > Now one gripe I have about Arminius' character was
> that he profited
> > by being a turn coat. He took the " Saxon shilling "
> as the Irish
> > rebel song says of others, collaborated as an
> officer in the Roman
> > army which ultimately lead to his victory in the
> forest since he
> > knew the Roman tactics.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Quintus Lanius Paulinus
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M•IVL•SEVERVS
> > <marcusiuliusseverus@l...> wrote:
> > > Salvete omnes,
> > >
> > > I thought this piece of information could be of
> some interest,
> > specially because offers some clues for later
> historical events...
> > >
> > > The name of the Teutoburg Forest in Germany will
> forever be
> > connected to one of the most famous battles from
> ancient history,
> > the clades Variana, the defeat of the Roman general
> Varus. In
> > September 9 CE, a coalition of Germanic tribes, led
> by a nobleman
> > named Arminius, defeated the Seventeenth,
> Eighteenth, and Nineteenth
> > legions and forced their commander Publius
> Quintilius Varus to
> > commit suicide. The result of the battle was that
> Germania remained
> > independent and was never included in the Roman
> empire.
> > > In the nineteenth century, the battle became a
> powerful national
> > symbol. In 1806, the French army of Napoleon
> Bonaparte decisively
> > beat the armies of the German states. The
> humiliation was too big
> > for the Germans, who started to look to the battle
> in the Teutoburg
> > Forest as their finest hour. As Napoleon spoke a
> romanic language
> > and presented himself as a Roman emperor, it was
> easy for the
> > Germans to remind each other that they had once
> before defeated the
> > welschen Erbfeind - an untranslatable expression
> that refers to the
> > Latin speaking archenemies of Germany. The Teutoburg
> Forest became
> > the symbol of the eternal opposition between the
> overcivilised and
> > decadent Latin and the creative and vital Germanic
> people, between
> > old France and new Germany.
> > > To make the connection between the noble savages
> of Antiquity and
> > the modern nation closer, the Germanic war leader
> whose name had
> > been rendered by the Romans as Arminius was referred
> to by his
> > (presumed) real Germanic name: Hermann. Already
> famous in the days
> > of Martin Luther, who invented the name Hermann, the
> Germanic leader
> > became a very popular hero in nineteenth-century and
> early twentieth-
> > century Germany, and a symbol of national unity that
> could be used
> > on almost any occasion. For example, in 1809, the
> romantic poet
> > Heinrich von Kleist (1777-1811) wrote a play called
> Die
> > Hermannsschlacht, to inspire the Germans to a natio
> === Message Truncated ===
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> - Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>"
> on the web.
> - To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
> - Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37696 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: the Legions are Lost
Salve

I would bet that Satan has already ruled through proxies Ivan the Great, Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Mao.

I am sure we could find others to list.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: raymond fuentes<mailto:praefectus2324@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] the Legions are Lost


Give Satan an inch and hed be a ruler.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com> <spqr753@...<mailto:spqr753@...>> wrote:
> Salve Romans FYIvaleTiberius Galerius Paulinus
"Deep in the forest, the le
> gions are lost.
> The clamour of armour and brass,
> the joyful perfection of youth and geometry,
> of order and open space, is muffled beneath
> the obscure chaos of indifferent branches
> and enveloping gloom: deep in the forest,
> the legions are lost.
>
> How young we were,
> and glorious, when in the full sun of
> Roman days, we sought an Empire of Reason,
> rather than a reason for Empire.
> How old we are now, with arms too leaden
> to embrace either a man or an ideal.
>
> The forest is inscrutable, and whispers
> the foreign words of wind through insensible leaves.
> An occasional messenger, lame and thin,
> brings news of battles, but in another place,
> sometime already past.
>
> His eyes are filled
> with shadows. He says little we do not already
> know: deep in the forest, the legions are lost."
>
>
> © All contents copyright the
author<mailto:literatus@...
> >, unless otherwise noted.
> Site design by Sinister
Designs<http://www.sinister-designs.com/design/inde<http://www.sinister-designs.com/design/inde>
> x.html>,
> server powered by e-smith<http://www.esmith.com/<http://www.esmith.com/>>.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






______________________________________________________
Yahoo! for Good
Watch the Hurricane Katrina Shelter From The Storm concert
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/shelter<http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/shelter>



SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire+coin&c=4&s=108&.sig=fpAyzYW3csq-H8KFAfQSMQ> Fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire+coin&c=4&s=108&.sig=lyFkJ7nHzGWIT0PODMw2Ig> The fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire+coin&c=4&s=108&.sig=VlKUg5KX6cBKyXqhfvKKrA>
Roman empire coin<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire+coin&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire+coin&c=4&s=108&.sig=R1VJPsQoHxKWUk-7cqk9-Q>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37697 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: Does anyone know where is Senator C. Marius Merullus?
Salve Gnae Corneli,

I just spoke with Senator Merullus about this. He says he'll look at
his mainlist e-mail later this evening and I expect he'll contact you
about the mailing list then.

Vale,

-- Marinus

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus wrote:

> Salvete Quirites!
>
> I would like to ask you, People of Nove Roma, to help me in a certain case.
>
> I am seeking Senator C. Merullus who is the owner of mailig list Nova Roma Vizantia. This ML is for Europe and Asia and the whole East.
>
> I would like to undertake the moderation of that currently dead ML and restore to life because Europe and particulary the not-English-speaker Europe would need an own ML.
>
> Illustris Senator Merullus has promised that help us in this matter -- but then he disappeared.
>
> You can ask the question why not create simply a new ML?
>
> Merullus' ML is created in 1999 and, with respect, I wouldn' like to change it with a new, "a younger"... This ML has a past, old members with lots of messages of great value in the archive and if we decide to leave it we decide to delete and ignore the work and history of seven years... If there is a chance to conserve this ML I want it. However if Merullus won't anwser my letter, I must create a new one.
>
> Please, if anybody knows how can I communicate with Senator C. Marius Merullus to help me. If there is somebody who used to communicate with Merullus, please tell him that I need his help!
>
> THANK YOU? QUIRITES!
>
>
>
>
>
> Cnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37698 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: Magna Mater Project site?
L IUL SULLA S APOLLONIO SCIPIONI SD

I can answer your question: we are close to publish it. During these
days I am completing it with the society Informa; the following step
will be to show it to my Cohors, do the last corrections and show
the final results to our Cives.

BENE VALE
L IUL SULLA
Aedilis Curulis

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Sextus Apollonius Scipio
<scipio_apollonius@y...> wrote:
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> could anyone tell me where is now the site for the Magna Mater
Project? (maybe I missed
> something?) The link on the main site is not valid any more. Thank
you.
>
> Valete,
>
> Sextus Apollonius Scipio
>
> Propraetor Galliae
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
> http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37699 From: Gaius Marius Merullus Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: Does anyone know where is Senator C. Marius Merullus?
Salve Cn Corneli

Please see my reply to your private e-mail.

Vale

C Marius Merullus
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus" <cn_corn_lent@...>
To: "Nova Roma ML" <nova-roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 1:44 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Does anyone know where is Senator C. Marius Merullus?


> Salvete Quirites!
>
> I would like to ask you, People of Nove Roma, to help me in a certain
> case.
>
> I am seeking Senator C. Merullus who is the owner of mailig list Nova Roma
> Vizantia. This ML is for Europe and Asia and the whole East.
>
> I would like to undertake the moderation of that currently dead ML and
> restore to life because Europe and particulary the not-English-speaker
> Europe would need an own ML.
>
> Illustris Senator Merullus has promised that help us in this matter -- but
> then he disappeared.
>
> You can ask the question why not create simply a new ML?
>
> Merullus' ML is created in 1999 and, with respect, I wouldn' like to
> change it with a new, "a younger"... This ML has a past, old members with
> lots of messages of great value in the archive and if we decide to leave
> it we decide to delete and ignore the work and history of seven years...
> If there is a chance to conserve this ML I want it. However if Merullus
> won't anwser my letter, I must create a new one.
>
> Please, if anybody knows how can I communicate with Senator C. Marius
> Merullus to help me. If there is somebody who used to communicate with
> Merullus, please tell him that I need his help!
>
> THANK YOU? QUIRITES!
>
>
>
>
>
> Cnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
> Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
> Accensus Consulis Fr. Apuli Caesaris
> Scriba Aedilis Curulis L. Iuli Sullae
> Scriba Interpres Linguae Latinae Senior Tulliae Scholasticae
> Scriba Magistri Araneari Iunior Q. Cassi Calvi
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37700 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: carmen Romanum Arminio
A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque omnibus S.P.D.

Since the Germans are in such a singing mood today, let us reply, in
Roman fashion. The following song is included in our Assimil textbook, 'La
Methode Assimil: le Latin sans Peine,' by C. Desessard,
Chennevieres-sur-Marne, 1966, pp.450-452.

Calix Sanctus (Holy Goblet)

1. Provinciae propinemus/celebrandae patriae!
Omnes ordine bibamus/merum nostrae vineae!

[Let us drink a toast to our province to honor our native land! Let
everyone in turn drink unmixed wine from our vineyard!

Chorus: Calix sancte, ignis plene,/Fund(e) animis,/
Ardorem funde laetum,/Viresque fortium.

2. Gentis liber(ae) et antiquae/optat cladem Barbarus:/
Lingua nostra si taceret,/Decus nostr(um) occideret.

[The Barbarian desires the destruction of a free and ancient race;/
if we keep silent (literally, 'if our tongue keeps silent'), our glory will
fail/fall.]

3. Immo gentis resurgentis/Prima simus semina!/
Et Latinae civitatis/Condamus fundamina.

[Indeed, we are the first seeds of a resurgent race, and let us
establish the foundations of a Latin state.]


It sounds better in Latin...and this is a song we Latinists consider
highly suitable as a national anthem for NR. A minor wording change will
make it even better.

Those who have the Assimil text and tapes can play this and practice it.

Valete,

A. Tullia Scholastica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37701 From: luciusserviliusprimus Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Posting
Salvete Omnes,

I am new to the Nova Roma group and lopok forward to learning all I
can about the Roman way of life.

Valete,

Lucius Servilius Primus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37702 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-11
Subject: Re: Posting
G. Equitius Cato S. Octavio Vero L. Servilio Primo S.P.D.

Salvete viri!

Welcome to the Republic. If you have any questions do not hesitate to
contact any magistrate (or citizen) to ask.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37703 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: prid. Id. Sept.
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est pridie Idus Septembris; haec dies comitialis est.

"Rem tene, verba sequentur." (Keep to the subject and the words will
follow) - Cato the Elder

"Strange to relate, that single combat had such a far-reaching
influence upon the whole war that the Gauls hastily abandoned their
camp and moved off into the neighbourhood of Tibur. They formed an
alliance offensive and defensive with that city, and the Tiburtines
supplied them generously with provisions. After receiving this
assistance they passed on into Campania. This was the reason why in
the following year the consul, C. Poetilius Balbus, led an army, by
order of the people, against the Tiburtines, though the conduct of the
war against the Hernici had fallen by lot to his colleague, M. Fabius
Ambustus. Though the Gauls had come back from Campania to their
assistance, it was undoubtedly by the Tiburtine generals that the
cruel depredations in the territories of Labici, Tusculum, and Alba
were carried out. To act against the Tiburtines, the republic was
content with a consul, but the sudden re-appearance of the Gauls
required a Dictator. Q. Servilius Ahala was nominated, and he selected
T. Quinctius as Master of the Horse. On the authority of the senate,
he made a vow to celebrate the Great Games, should the issue of the
war prove favourable. After giving orders for the consul's army to
remain where it was, in order to confine the Tiburtines to their own
war, the Dictator made all the "juniors" take the military oath,
without a single refusal. The battle, in which the whole strength of
the City was engaged, took place not far from the Colline Gate in the
sight of the parents and wives and children of the Roman soldiers.
Even when absent, the thought of those near and dear to one is a great
incentive to courage, but now that they were within view they fired
the men with a firm resolve to win their applause and secure their
safety. There was great slaughter on both sides, but the Gauls were in
the end repulsed, and fled in the direction of Tibur as though it were
a Gaulish stronghold. The straggling fugitives were intercepted by the
consul not far from Tibur; the townsmen sallied out to render them
assistance, and they and the Gauls were driven within their gates. So
the consul was equally successful with the Dictator. The other consul,
Fabius, crushed the Hernici in successive defeats, at first in
comparatively unimportant actions and then finally in one great battle
when the enemy attacked him in full strength. The Dictator passed
splendid encomiums on the consuls, both in the senate and before the
people, and even transferred to them the credit for his own success.
He then laid down his office. Poetilius celebrated a double triumph -
over the Gauls and over the Tiburtines. It was considered a sufficient
honour for Fabius to be allowed to enter the City in an ovation. The
Tiburtines laughed at Poetilius' triumph. "When," they said, "had he
ever met them in a pitched battle? A few of them had come outside
their gates to watch the disordered flight of the Gauls, but when they
found that they, too, were being attacked and cut down
indiscriminately they retreated into their city. Did the Romans deem
that sort of thing worthy of a triumph? They must not look upon it as
too great and wonderful a thing to create disorder in an enemy's
gates; they would themselves see greater confusion and panic before
their own walls." " - Livy, History of Rome 7.11


In ancient Greece today was held in honor of Astrea. Astraea ("the
star-maiden") is the daughter of Zeus and Themis. She was, as was her
mother, a goddess of justice. During the Golden Age, when the gods
dwelled among mankind, she lived on the earth. When evil and
wickedness increased its grip on humanity, the gods abandoned the
habitations of mankind. Astraea was the last to leave and took up her
abode among the stars where she was transformed into the constellation
Virgo; the scales of justice she carried became the nearby
constellation Libra.

5 Astraea is a large main belt asteroid. Its surface is highly
reflective (bright) and its composition is probably a mixture of
nickel-iron with magnesium- and iron-silicates. Astraea was the fifth
asteroid discovered, on December 8, 1845 by K. L. Hencke. It was his
first of two asteroid discoveries. The second was 6 Hebe. An amateur
astronomer and post office employee, Hencke was looking for 4 Vesta
when he stumbled on Astraea. The King of Prussia awarded him with an
annual pension of $300.00 for the discovery. Astrea is notable mainly
because for 38 years (since the discovery of Vesta in 1807) it had
been thought that there were only four asteroids. After the discovery
of Astraea, thousands of other asteroids would follow.



In ancient China today was held in honor of Meng Jiangnu. It was said
that 2,000 years ago when Qin Shihuang (the First Emperor of the Qin)
was building the Great Wall, a young man called Fan Xiliang was forced
to work on the construction of the Great Wall even on his wedding day.
Before Fan Xiliang went away, his bride, a girl named Meng Jiangnu,
took her white jade hairpin and broke it into two halves and gave her
husband one half as a token of love. Meng Jiangnu waited for her
husband at home for five years but did not hear a word from him. One
night, Meng Jiangnu had a bad dream. She dreamed that her husband was
constantly yelling: "Cold, cold!" She recalled that her husband was
wearing very thin clothes. Very soon, she made some padded clothes and
set off alone to look for Xiliang. After walking all the way on foot,
crossing mountains and rivers, Meng Jiangnu finally got to the
construction site of the Great Wall where she was told that her
husband had died and was buried under the Great Wall. Hearing this sad
news of the death of her beloved, she sat down at the foot of the
Great Wall and started crying. She cried day and night, and her
wailing made the wall fall. She finally saw her husband's bones under
the wall . This made Qin Shihuang very angry, and he ordered Meng
Jiangnu to be punished. When he saw the young lady, however, he was
immediately attracted by her beauty. He asked her to marry him. Meng
Jiangnu had to agree but asked for a grand funeral for her husband.
After the funeral, she and Qin Shihuang went for a trip on the Bohai
Sea. How could she marry the tyrant who had killed her husband? She
could not, so she jumped into the sea unseen by the guards. Now on the
shore of the Bohai Sea, beyond Shanhaiguan Pass there are two black
rocky reefs. According to legend, the round one is Meng Jiangnu's tomb
and the square one is her tomb tablet. Not far from her tomb, a temple
was built on a small hill to commemorate the lady of chastity.


In ancient Babylonia today was held in honor of the god Bel. Bel is
in the second rank of Babylonian deities, second only to the supreme
deity. This deity in Assyria was Asshur. He is recognized by most
authorities as Asshur, a son of Shem and grandson of Noah, who was
probably the hero and leader of one of the early migrations, and, as
founder of the Assyrian Empire, gave it its name --- his own being
magnified and deified by his warlike descendants. Assyria was the
oldest of the great empires, occupying Mesopotamia --- the vast plain
watered by the Tigris and Euphrates rivers --- with adjacent countries
to the north, west, and east. Its seat was in the northern portion of
this region, while that of Babylonia or Chaldaea, its rival, was in
the southern part; and although after many wars freed from the
subjection of Assyria, the institutions of Babylonia, and especially
its religion, were very much the same as those of the elder empire. In
Babylonia the chief god was called El or Il. In Babylon, although
Bab-el, their tutelary god, was at the head of the pantheon, his form
was not represented, nor had he any special temple for his worship.
The Assyrian Asshur placed kings upon their thrones, protected their
armies, and directed their expeditions. In speaking of him it was
"Asshur, my Lord." He was also called "King of Kings," reigning
supreme over the gods; and sometimes he was called the "Father of the
gods." His position in the celestial hierarchy corresponds with the
Zeus of the Greeks, and with the Jupiter of the Romans. He was
represented as a man with a horned cap, carrying a bow and issuing
from a winged circle, which circle was the emblem of ubiquity and
eternity. This emblem was also the accompaniment of Assyrian royalty.
Ranking after El in Babylon, Asshur in Assyria, and Baal in Phoenicia
--- all shadows of the same supreme God --- we notice among these
Mesopotamians a triad of the great gods, called Anu, Bel, and Hea.
Anu, the primordial chaos; Hea, life and intelligence animating
matter; and Bel, the organizing and creative spirit --- corresponding
basically to Iuppiter, Pluto, and Neptune in the division of authority
over the heavens, the underworld, and the oceans. The god Bel, in the
pantheon of the Babylonians and Assyrians, is the God of gods, and
Father of gods, who made the earth and heaven. His title expresses
dominion.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy (http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/Livy/), Astrea
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page) and ("Astraea." Encyclopedia
Mythica. 2005. Encyclopedia Mythica Online.
12 Sep. 2005 <http://www.pantheon.org/articles/a/astraea.html>.), Meng
Jiangnu
(http://www.warriortours.com/cityguides/beijing/gr
eat_wall/menjiangnu.htm), Bel
(http://www.abacci.com/history/history.aspx?historyID=105)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37704 From: Marcus Quirinus Sulla Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: About Teutoburg forest battle
I recommend heartily the book " La battaglia che fermò l'impero
romano", by Peter S. Wells ( as edited in Italy ed. Il Saggiatore),
first published by W.W.Norton & Company inc.,500 Fifht avenue, New
York, " The battle that stopped Rome".
Optime valete omnes
Marcus Quirinus Sulla
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37705 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: LUDI: An exercise in spontaneous play-writing
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

I'm writing as an unofficial assistant to aedilis
curulis C. Fabia Livia to announce a new piece of
entertainment for the ludi Romani.

The ludi Romani usually included plays, but of course
it's hard to perform a play over the internet, so
during these ludi we're going to try something
different. We're going to write a play over the
internet.

Yes, here on this list, you and I and all of us are
going to write a play. It probably won't be very good,
it may make no sense at all, and it may not even get
finished. That doesn't matter. The point is to have
fun with it.

The rules are pretty minimal. I'll post the first two
parts of the play, just to get it going and to show
you the format. Then it's up to you to continue it
however you like (though I may join in again later).

Feel free to change the style, create new characters,
and take the story in new directions. You can write in
the style of Plautus, Shakespeare, Star Wars, Monty
Python's Flying Circus, of whatever else you can think
of. You can write in prose or verse, or even as a
musical or an opera.

No points will be awarded, and there will be no
winner. There is no limit on the number of
contributions a person can make.

There are just a few things I would ask you to do.

1. Please clearly indicate whether your contribution
is part one, two, three, or whatever.

2. Please repeat the last few lines of the previous
episode at the beginning of your own, just to help us
remember where we are in the story.

3. Please only continue from the end of the last part
which has been posted. If part four has been posted,
continue from the end of part four, not from the end
of part three. Otherwise we'll get the story branching
into parallel universes, and that will be confusing.

4. It may be a good idea to keep your contributions
quite short, or else by the time you've finished
writing you may find that someone else has already
posted the episode you were writing.

5. Any questions about how it works, just ask.

Parts One and Two will follow shortly. The rest is up
to you...



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37706 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: LUDI Play: Part One
THE FURTHER ADVENTURES OF M. TEDIUS PRACTIS: PART ONE


(The Roman Forum, late at night. We hear footsteps
approaching. Enter TEDIUS, a night-watchman, wearing
normal civilian clothes and carrying a burning torch.
More footsteps approach, clanking and clattering.
Enter PRECARIUS, a teenager, almost invisible under
makeshift armour composed of cooking-pots and bits of
wood, and brandishing a piece of blunt metal as a
sword. He is veering about and stumbling. TEDIUS
stops. PRECARIUS walks straight into him and collapses
in a heap.)

(Pause.)

TEDIUS: What on earth are you doing?

PRECARIUS: Mfflrf kflmmp.

TEDIUS: (Lifting PRECARIUS' cooking-pot helmet) A
little late-night cookery, is it?

PRECARIUS: It's my armour! If I'm going to be a
night-watchman...

TEDIUS: Hercle! If there could be anything smaller
than an atom, your brain would be the outstanding
candidate.

PRECARIUS: What's an atom?

TEDIUS: Not a philosopher, eh? Look, do you see me
wearing armour?

PRECARIUS: No, but...

TEDIUS: Anyway, why would you want to be a
night-watchman? My pay's lousy, my job's boring, and
my hours couldn't be more anti-social if I were a
professional owl-tamer. Plus I get followed around by
a spotty kid.

PRECARIUS: I'm not spotty!

TEDIUS: (Pokes PRECARIUS on the nose) What's that,
then?

PRECARIUS: Ow! Dat's by doze!

TEDIUS: Lucky you. I wish I could have a doze. But I
have to stay up all night on patrol.

(A high-pitched scream is heard.)

PRECARIUS: Hey, what's that?

TEDIUS: It wasn't me. What do you think I am, a
eunuch?

(TEDIUS reluctantly goes to investigate. PRECARIUS
gathers himself up and follows, with bits of armour
falling off here and there as he walks. The light of
TEDIUS' torch illuminates a woman lying on the ground.
PRECARIUS leans over her.)

PRECARIUS: She's out cold.

TEDIUS: Don't touch until you know how much she
charges.

PRECARIUS: You think she's a prostitute?

TEDIUS: Why else would she be out here alone at this
time of night?

PRECARIUS: She doesn't look like a prostitute.

TEDIUS: And you've got a lot of experience, have
you?

PRECARIUS: (Blushing) No, I mean, but, look at those
expensive clothes.

TEDIUS: She must be very good at it.

PRECARIUS: But why's she lying here unconscious?

TEDIUS: Oh, she probably just had a Sabine as a
client and fainted with shock when she saw how tiny
his...

PRECARIUS: Hey, Tedius, look over here!

TEDIUS: ... wallet was. Look, you nit, if you
interrupt me once more when I'm making a dirty joke
you'll spend a night in the Tullianum. What is it?

(TEDIUS goes over to where PRECARIUS is. His torch
reveals the body of a man. The man's head is
considerably further from his body than most doctors
would recommend.)

TEDIUS: Oh hades. Right, we've got to wake this
woman up. Stop being sick and make yourself useful.

PRECARIUS: Uuuhhhhh...

TEDIUS: Hey, you! Wake up! Wake up!

(The woman, PECULIA, regains consciousness.)

PECULIA: What? Who are you?

TEDIUS: Never mind that, who are you and what are
you doing here?

PECULIA: I'm... I'm Peculia.

TEDIUS: So I see. But don't worry, my great-aunt had
a nose like yours and she still found a husband in the
end.

PECULIA: What? No, my name's Peculia.

TEDIUS: Oh, I see. Well don't be embarrassed, I've
heard some pretty silly names. You can whisper it to
me if you like.

PECULIA: Oh for heaven's sake! My name *is* Peculia!

TEDIUS: I never said it wasn't. Look, we don't have
time for this. What are you doing here?

(TO BE CONTINUED...)





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37707 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: LUDI Play: Part Two
THE FURTHER ADVENTURES OF M. TEDIUS PRACTIS: PART TWO


PECULIA: Oh for heaven's sake! My name *is* Peculia!

TEDIUS: I never said it wasn't. Look, we don't have
time for this. What are you doing here?

(A spotlight focusses on PECULIA as she begins to
sing.)

PECULIA: I don't know how it happened...
We were walking down the street
When all at once I saw a strange sight -
The strangest you could ever meet.

TEDIUS: What was it?

PECULIA: (Interrupting him, continuing her song) We
were on our way to dinner
On the other side of town
To our dear friend's birthday-party -
The rumour is he's hired a clown.

TEDIUS: Yes, but this strange sight...

PECULIA: I know it seems a little childish -
It's quite embarrassing to say -
But ever since I was a young girl
Clowns can really make my day.

TEDIUS: Can I just ask you about...

PECULIA: With their funny big red noses
And their great enormous shoes;
We used to hire one every weekend
And then have one of mother's stews.

TEDIUS: Well, was a clown involved in the strange...

PECULIA: Oh mother's stews were really lovely!
With all the food left in the house:
She'd throw it all right in together -
Until the time she cooked the mouse.

TEDIUS: Your mother, was she with you when...

PECULIA: That mouse was everything I cared for:
The dearest pet of all my life.
But, alas, its days were ended
By my mother's carving-knife.

TEDIUS: Ah, about this knife...

PECULIA: She chopped it into little pieces;
It made me wail and scream and cry!
And what she left out of the stew-pot
She served up later as a pie.

TEDIUS: Um, could we get back to...

PECULIA: I never found out why she did it.
She passed away soon after that,
Though not before she'd fried the budgie
And barbecued the cat.

TEDIUS: Oh, for heaven's sake...

PECULIA: Of course my husband was delighted.
He'd always wished she'd drop down dead.
And it hadn't helped the situation
When she'd tried to boil his head.

TEDIUS: I give up. Precarius, let's...

PECULIA: But then my husband did bear grudges,
And I suppose that may be why
When we were walking down the street here
A man jumped out and shouted "die!"

TEDIUS: What?

PECULIA: He drew his sword and killed my husband;
I didn't know him - he was masked.
And I suppose that's when I fainted.
Now, sorry, what was it you asked?

TEDIUS: Um...

PRECARIUS: Tedius, come over here! I've found
something!

(TO BE CONTINUED...)



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37708 From: C. Fabia Livia Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: Ludi Romani theatrical quiz (8)
Which playwright is said to have fought in the war
against Hannibal and later to have been driven into
exile?


Answers, plus your Roman name, by private email
(c_fabia_livia@...) please within the next 24
hours.

Livia



___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37709 From: C. Fabia Livia Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: Ludi Romani picture quiz (5)
The picture can be found at:
http://www.livia.org.uk/index.php?link=games

Today's questions are:

1. Who is this?

2. Who is the artist?


Answers, plus your Roman name, by private email
(c_fabia_livia@...) please, within the next 24
hours.

Livia





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37710 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: LUDI Play: Part Three
THE FURTHER ADVENTURES OF M. TEDIUS PRACTIS: PART THREE

In our last thrilling episode, we saw:

PECULIA: He drew his sword and killed my husband;
I didn't know him - he was masked.
And I suppose that's when I fainted.
Now, sorry, what was it you asked?

TEDIUS: Um...

PRECARIUS: Tedius, come over here! I've found
something!

======================================================

And now...

TEDIUS: (puffing) What is it boy?

PRECARIUS: Looks like a purse.

TEDIUS: Is there any money in it?

PRECARIUS: I don't know. Do you think we should touch it? Or wait for the
Vigiles?

TEDIUS: Why let them have the money? We found it.

PRECARIUS: *I* found it.

TEDIUS: Of course you did boy. But I'm your mentor, right? (kneeling)
Hmmmm... this is a nice handful of denarii (handing one to Precarius)
There's a little reward for you boy. Good work. Maybe someday you'll be a
keen-eyed night watchman like me.

PECULIA: What are you doing?

TEDIUS: Nothing Peculia.

Precarius: Everyone picks up purses they find in the street...

( To be continued ... )
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37711 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Ambrosius Celetrus Caecilio Metello s.d.

"Q. Caecilius Metellus" wrote:

> About what the Collegium "consistently and shamelessly fails to do."
> There are a number of things which fall into this category. But, for
> that matter, you could say that there are a number of things any given
>
> priest, magistrate, or senator "consistently and shamlessly fails to
> do."

The "number of things" that civil magistrates and senators fail to do
are irrelevant. The body religious of Nova Roma must be held to a higher
standard.

> For one thing, as much as I hate to hear it myself, we are a
> volunteer organization,

One volunteers to serve the Dii Immortales. Once the oath is taken, the
vow is made to serve and honor Them, and to "serve the public rites of
the state religion (which is the entire reason NR was created, or so I'm
told in the Annals), there is nothing "volunteer" about it. The vow is
solemn and demanding.

And since the Collegium Pontificum has failed to offer the public rites
in honor of the Gods and Goddesses on far too many occasions to list,
while otherwise engaging in civil activities, they are all clearly in
contempt of the Gods.. They have broken their vows, and therefor there
IS no Collegium Pontificum, and your own adlection is spurious. If your
agnomen of "Pius" is anything other than a four-letter word, you would
decline inauguration.

> there is no reason to do whatever it is they may be
> required to do.

But they can be penalized for failing to do the job. A Catholic priest
cannot be defrocked by the secular authorities, nor can those
authorities (usually) mandate what religion teaches, but a religious can
be brought up on criminal and civil charges, and secular sanctions can
be applied.

One of the current CP has been fond of saying, "We're the CP, what we
say goes, and there's nothing you can do about it." But surely a law can
be put forth banning any negligent priest, priestess or pontiff, indeed
the whole CP, from participating on any NR list, in any activity, and
from voting in comitia and senate, whenever they are in negligent
default of their sacerdotal duties, and until such time as they offer a
piaculum, and resume them. If you, for your "own part...intend to help
bring about change," then use your current status to help force our a -
llustris CP to "serve the public rites."


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37712 From: os390account Date: 2005-09-12
Subject: LUDI Play: Part Four
THE FURTHER ADVENTURES OF M. TEDIUS PRACTIS: PART FOUR

In our last thrilling episode, we saw:

TEDIUS: Of course you did boy. But I'm your mentor, right? (kneeling)
Hmmmm... this is a nice handful of denarii (handing one to Precarius)
There's a little reward for you boy. Good work. Maybe someday you'll
be a
keen-eyed night watchman like me.

PECULIA: What are you doing?

TEDIUS: Nothing Peculia.

Precarius: Everyone picks up purses they find in the street...

======================================================

And now...

TEDIUS: Well, not everyone. I mean, you won't see a Vestal Virgin
bend over to pick...

LOQUACIA: (arriving out of breath) Oh mistress! I heard you scream
from the vestibule, so I ran as fast as the Graces would permit
without looking like a harlot racing to make an offering at the
shrine of Venus before servicing half the XXth, because that
wouldn't seem fitting for one of your maidservants if she were
running too quickly, when all she needed to do was walk at a
conservative yet hastened pace that's not too...

PECULIA: Yes, yes, yes, dear child. As you can see, I am quite
well, but I fear that my beloved is in less than excellent shape.

TEDIUS and PRECARIUS glance at each other and roll their eyes

LOQUACIA: The master!! Who would do such a wretched thing to
someone so noble as any senator, though not quite so noble as some
of the patrician families living on the Via Satis, although more
noble than Titus Lucius' daughter -- you know, Righty Titi, Lefty
Luci? -- never was such a master so thoughtful and caring to his...

PECULIA: (covering Loquacia's mouth) I completely agree with you. A
sad occasion this is, do you not agree, Tedius?

PRECARIUS: (poking Tedius in the side) Um...

TEDIUS: (to Precarius) Yes? (quickly turning to Peculia) Yes. (and
back to Precarius) Yes?

PRECARIUS: (points) Look who's coming...

( To be continued ... )
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37713 From: Maior Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
M.Hortensia Maior A. Ambrosio salutem dicit;
Salve; Celetre this is very sad to see. You are cross with
Cato when he posts the calendar and now you are giving the pontifices
a difficult time.
Both Gaius Buteo and Quintus Metellus are very active in real
world activities with the Religio, they are trying their best to get
things started and active with the Religio, so please give that some
thought.
Now what are you doing in your part of Pennsylvania for the
Religio? What are you doing in NR? We don't need to institute some
kind of punitive system, that would really drive anyone away. And we
are all volunteers.
Have you written any rituals for the gods? Have you taken the
religio course at Academia Thules, and if so are you volunteering to
help teach others. I started Sodalitas Diis Inferis and gladly
transferred owndership to Gaius Buteo Modianus,everyone there will
benefit and can speak with G. Buteo who is not only a pontifex but
also a flamen and augur and making himself and his knowledge
available. This is the kind of positive activity NR needs for the
religio. Working together is the only way.
bene vale
Marca Hortensia Mairo



. If you, for your "own part...intend to help
> bring about change," then use your current status to help force our
a -
> llustris CP to "serve the public rites."
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37714 From: David Kling Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Salve;
Very good point! There IS so much that needs to be done. It is impossible
for one or two people to accomplish it. Rome had a LOT of people
contributing to the support of the Religio Romana. Nova Roma does not.
Working together is the only way.
Vale;
C. Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 9/13/05, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M.Hortensia Maior A. Ambrosio salutem dicit;
> Salve; Celetre this is very sad to see. You are cross with
> Cato when he posts the calendar and now you are giving the pontifices
> a difficult time.
> Both Gaius Buteo and Quintus Metellus are very active in real
> world activities with the Religio, they are trying their best to get
> things started and active with the Religio, so please give that some
> thought.
> Now what are you doing in your part of Pennsylvania for the
> Religio? What are you doing in NR? We don't need to institute some
> kind of punitive system, that would really drive anyone away. And we
> are all volunteers.
> Have you written any rituals for the gods? Have you taken the
> religio course at Academia Thules, and if so are you volunteering to
> help teach others. I started Sodalitas Diis Inferis and gladly
> transferred owndership to Gaius Buteo Modianus,everyone there will
> benefit and can speak with G. Buteo who is not only a pontifex but
> also a flamen and augur and making himself and his knowledge
> available. This is the kind of positive activity NR needs for the
> religio. Working together is the only way.
> bene vale
> Marca Hortensia Mairo
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37715 From: C. Fabia Livia Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Ludi Romani theatrical quiz (9)
Which two playwrights were managed by L. Ambivius
Turpio?


Answers, plus your Roman name, by private email
(c_fabia_livia@...) please, within the next 24
hours.

Livia





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37716 From: C. Fabia Livia Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Ludi Romani picture quiz (6)
The picture can be found at:
http://www.livia.org.uk/index.php?link=games

Today's questions are:

1. Who are the two people represented here?

2. What is the date of the statue?


Answers, plus your Roman name, by private email
(c_fabia_livia@...) please, within the next 24
hours.

Livia



___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37717 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: EYES ON THE SKIES - II
G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana omnes SPD.

I've been remiss in my duties to Deus Horus, one of the deities
of domus Aurelia Falconis. I'd intended to get this to the list
by the beginning of Septembris, but . . . my apologies.

There are a number of significant events in the skies during
this fourth quarter of anno 2758. Lunar, solar and meteoric
events make this an interesting few months. Most of the event
dates and times are gleaned from SKY AND TELESCOPE, one of the
most comprehensive (and approachable) English-language sites on
astronomy at <http://skyandtelescope.com). From the home page,
go to the left sidebar and click "Observing." For lunar and
solar rise / set times, you can print out the full year's infor-
mation at HR MacMillan Space Centre (NB the Canadian spelling of
"centre") <http://hrmacmillanspacecentre.com>

SEPTEMBER 14 - 18: SOL
For devotees of Sol in any guise, Sunspot Group 10808 (formerly
called Group 10798), has been hyperactive in the last few days.
It gave birth to seven major X-class flares that have altered the
near-Earth environment, disrupted radio communications, and
created spectacular auroras. The group is large enough to see
with the unaided eye THROUGH A ***SAFE*** SOLAR FILTER. "808"
will rotate across the solar disc during the next two weeks,
with the greatest effects likely through about September 18.
Spacecraft, power grids and radio communications (including cell
phones) may be affected. Keep watch for especially beautiful
auroral displays.

SEPTEMBER 17: HARVEST MOON
This is the full moon closest to the autumn Equinox. The
Harvest Moon is in the night sky longer than any other full
moons, and traditionally provides extra light just when farmers
need it most. Why in this season? The moon orbits the Earth
nearly following a line called the ecliptic. Near the autumn
Equinox, the ecliptic makes its shallowest angle with the
horizon during the early evening. So the moon rises only 25
minutes later each night (usually it's 50 minutes later), and
shines brightly for several extra nights.

When you look at the Harvest Moon, give a thought to the Man in
the Moon. Because yes, Novi Romani, there is someone up there.
See "Tribute to Eugene Shoemaker" at the close of this post.

SEPTEMBER: MARS
Mars spends a brief period in Taurus in late September.

OCTOBER 3: SOL & LUNA
Solar eclipse: a true annular eclipse, where the moon never
completely hides the sun's disc, leaving a blazing ring around
the black bulk of the moon. The path of annularity starts in
the Atlantic Ocean, continues through Spain, Algeria, Tunisia,
Libya, Sudan, and Kenya, ending in the Indian Ocean. All of
Europa, the Middle East, Western Asia, and all but the
southernmost tip of Africa will see the sun partially eclipsed.

OCTOBER 17: LUNA
Partial lunar eclipse. Observers across the Pacific region, all
of Australia, much of the Far East, and most of North America
(except the Northeast) will see some darkening of the moon's
southern limb for about an hour. Mid-eclipse is 8:03 am Eastern
Daylight Time, 5:03 am Pacific Daylight Time.

OCTOBER 21: METEOR SHOWER
Orionid meteor shower in the southeastern sky (in Orion,
of course :-) ), peaking at about 2:00 am, rate of incidence
10 - 15 per hour. This and other meteor showeres are best
observed in the pre-dawn hours.

OCTOBER 30: MARS
Mars is closest to Earth on this day.

NOVEMBER: JUPITER
In early November, Jupiter rises in the eastern sky at dawn,
in Virgo. (Jupiter has been absent from the skies since its
conjunction with Venus back in September.)

NOVEMBER 7: MARS
Mars is in opposition to Earth (ie, on th opposite side of Sol).

NOVEMBER 17: METEOR SHOWER
Leonid shower in the eastern sky (in Leo, of course!). Peaking
about 2:00 am, rate of incidence 10 per hour.

DECEMBER: MERCURY
First half of this month is the best time for observing Mercury
(before sunrise).

DECEMBER 14: METEOR SHOWER
***MARK THIS ONE ON YOUR CALENDAR FOR SURE***
Geminid meteor shower in the southern sky (in Gemini, where else?).
Peaking around 2:00 am; rate of incidence ***75 per hour***


---------------------------------------------------------------------

In light of the Harvest Moon, a


TRIBUTE TO EUGENE SHOEMAKER

On January 6, 1998, the ashes of Eugene Shoemaker were launched
in a memorial capsule aboard Lunar Prospector. Over a year later,
in the final phase of its mission, Lunar Prospector was
deliberately crashed at the south Lunar pole as part of the search
for water on the moon. Prospector also carried Eugene Shoemaker,
finally, to the place he had spent a lifetime wanting to reach.
The date was July 31, 1999.

The general public got to know Shoemaker's name in 1993, when
Gene, his wife Carolyn, and David Levy discovered Comet Shoemaker-
Levy 9--the comet that executed such a spectacular crash dive
into the atmosphere of Jupiter in 1994. But Eugene Shoemaker
already had a long and accomplished history in planetary geology.

He had always wanted to go to the moon as an Apollo astronaut,
but health issues scrubbed him from the program. (I've often
wondered if the lame scientist in the Bruce Willis movie,
"Armageddon", wasn't modeled on Shoemaker.) Instead, he made
himself one of the world's pre-eminent (perhaps *the* pre-
eminent) planetary geologists, and established the Astrogeology
branch of the US Geological Survey at Flagstaff, Arizona. In
poignant irony, he helped select and train the Apollo astronauts
in lunar geology. During the moonwalks, he sat beside Walter
Cronkite giving geologic commentary. In 1992, he was awarded
the National Medal of Science, the highest scientific honor
bestowed by the President of the United States.

On July 18, 1997, Eugene Shoemaker was killed in a car accident
in Alice Springs, Australia. He was researching crater impact
geology. His wife Carolyn survived the crash.

A year before he died, Shoemaker is quoted as saying, "Not going
to the moon and banging on it with my own hammer has been the
biggest disappointment in life." But he made the best of what
he was given, with dignity and dedication. I have no way of
knowing if he ever read this passage, but he did emulate it:

"At every moment think steadily as a Roman and a human being, to
do what thou hast in hand with a perfect and simple dignity, and
feeling of affection, and freedom, and justice, and to give
thyself relief from all other thoughts. And thou wilt give
thyself relief, if thou doest every act of thy life as if it
were the last, laying aside all carelessness and all passionate
aversion to the commands of reason, and all hypocrisy, and all
self love and all discontent with the lot that has been given
thee. For thou seest how few those things are, the which if
one lays hold of them he is able to lead a life that flows in
quiet and is like the existence of the gods. For the gods on
their part will require nothing more of the one who observes
these things."
[Marcus Aurelius Antoninus. Meditations, II,v)


Around the capsule of Eugene Shoemaker's ashes is a piece of
brass foil inscribed with an image of Comet Hale-Bopp, the
last comet that he and Carolyn observed together, and which
was in the sky the year he died. The foil also carries his
favorite image of Meteor Crater, in Arizona. And it is inscribed
with a passage that expresses the enduring love between Carolyn
and Eugene Shoemaker. It also describes, in the words of his
former student Carolyn C. Porco, "what will now come to pass,
that every moon-lit sky will forever be made more beautiful by
Gene's inspiring presence." The passage is from Shakespeare's
"Romeo and Juliet":

"And when he shall die,
Take him and cut him out in little stars,
And he will make the face of heaven so fine
That all the world will be in love with night,
and pay no worship to the garish sun."


------------------------------------------------------------------

Good night, Eugene. Here's looking at you!

Dii deaque Te amant.

G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana

==================================================================

Sources:

articles on Eugene Shoemaker and links: <www.hypography.com>;
in the search bar, type Eugene Shoemaker.

"Eugene Shoemaker Ashes Carried on Lunar Prospector." University
of Arizona News Service, January 6, 1998.
<http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/sl9/news82.html>

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, Meditations. Translated by George Long.
Book-of-the-Month Club, NY 1996.

Portraits of Eugene Shoemaker: on google's search page, click
"Images", then search Eugene Shoemaker.

Sky and Telescope <skyandtelescope.com>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37718 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Id. Sept.
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est Idibus Septembribus; haec dies fastus est.

"O Father Jupiter who inhabits the Tarpeian Heights as His chosen
abode next to the heavens, and You Juno, Daughter of Saturnus, Â…
and You, divine Virgin, whose gentle breast is harshly girt with the
aegis of the terrible Gorgon, and all You Gods and Indigites of Italy,
hear me as I swear by Your divine powers" - Sillius Italicus, Punica
10.432-36

The Ides of September are sacred to the Capitoline Triad, Iuppiter,
Iuno, and Minerva. Their temple on the Capitoline Hill was dedicated
on this day in 509 B.C:

"However, the first introduction of plays, though intended as a means
of religious expiation, did not relieve the mind from religious
terrors nor the body from the inroads of disease. Owing to an
inundation of the Tiber, the Circus was flooded in the middle of the
Games, and this produced an unspeakable dread; it seemed as though the
gods had turned their faces from men and despised all that was done to
propitiate their wrath. C. Genucius and L. Aemilius Mamercus were the
new consuls, each for the second time. The fruitless search for
effective means of propitiation was affecting the minds of the people
more than disease was affecting their bodies. It is said to have been
discovered that the older men remembered that a pestilence had once
been assuaged by the Dictator driving in a nail. The senate believed
this to be a religious obligation, and ordered a Dictator to be
nominated for that purpose. L. Manlius Imperiosus was nominated, and
he appointed L. Pinarius as his Master of the Horse. There is an
ancient instruction written in archaic letters which runs: Let him who
is the praetor maximus fasten a nail on the Ides of September. This
notice was fastened up on the right side of the temple of Jupiter
Optimus Maximus, next to the chapel of Minerva. This nail is said to
have marked the number of the year -written records being scarce in
those days - and was for that reason placed under the protection of
Minerva because she was the inventor of numbers. Cincius, a careful
student of monuments of this kind, asserts that at Volsinii also nails
were fastened in the temple of Nortia, an Etruscan goddess, to
indicate the number of the year. It was in accordance with this
direction that the consul Horatius dedicated the temple of Jupiter
Optimus Maximus in the year following the expulsion of the kings; from
the consuls the ceremony of fastening the nails passed to the
Dictators, because they possessed greater authority." - Livy, History
of Rome 7.3

The Capitoline Hill (Capitolinus Mons), between the Forum and the
Campus Martius, is one of the most famous and highest of the seven
hills of Rome, the site of a temple for the Capitoline Triad: the gods
Iuppiter, his wife Iuno and their daughter Minerva. The temple was
started by Rome's last king, Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, and was
considered one of the largest and the most beautiful temples in the
city. When the Celtic Gauls raided Rome in 390 B.C., the Capitoline
Hill was the one section of the city to evade capture by the
barbarians.

The Capitoline echoes with famous events in Roman history; it was here
that Brutus and the assassins locked themselves inside the Temple of
Jupiter after murdering Caesar; here that the Gracchi plotted and
died; here the triumphant generals overlooked the city for which they
fought; here that the Gauls, creeping to the Citadel, were let in by
the infamous Vestal Virgin Tarpeia, daughter of Spurius Tarpeius, who
was later the first to die on the rocks. Political criminals were
murdered by being thrown off the steep crest of the hill, to fall on
the dagger-sharp Tarpeian Rocks below. When Julius Caesar suffered an
accident during his Triumph, clearly indicating the wrath of Iuppiter
for his actions in the Civil Wars, he approached the hill and
Iuppiter's temple on his knees as a way of averting the unlucky omen
(he was murdered six months later).

Iuppiter's most common epthets are:

1. Iuppiter Caelestis ("heavenly")
2. Iuppiter Fulgurator ("of the lightning")
3. Iuppiter Latarius ("God of Latium")
4. Iuppiter Lucetius ("of the light")
5. Iuppiter Pluvius ("sender of rain")
6. Iuppiter Stator (from stare meaning "standing")
7. Iuppiter Terminus or Jupiter Terminalus (defends boundaries).
8. Iuppiter Tonans ("thunderer")
9. Iuppiter Victor (led Roman armies to victory)
10. Iuppiter Summanus (sender of nocturnal thunder)
11. Iuppiter Feretrius ("who carries away [the spoils of war]")
12. Iuppiter Optimus Maximus (best [and] greatest)


The several aspects of sovereignty implied by some of Iuppiter's
titles are made explicit in the legendary history of early Rome (as
transmitted, for example, in Plutarch's Roman Lives and the first few
books of Livy). Thus the warlike Romulus invokes Jupiter Stator to
halt and terrify Rome's enemies, while the peaceful legislator Numa
Pompilius has a close relationship with Dius Fidius, who presides over
oaths. Iuppiter also stands at the head of the Archaic Triad of
Iuppiter, Mars and Quirinus. This grouping has been seen as a
religious representation of early Roman society, wherein Iuppiter
stands in for the ritual and augural authority of the Flamen Dialis
(high priest of Iuppiter) and the chief priestly colleges; Mars, with
his warrior and agricultural functions, stands in for the power of the
king and young nobles to bring prosperity and victory through
sympathetic magic with rituals like the October Horse and the
Lupercalia; Quirinus, from co-viri "men together", stands in for the
combined strength of the Roman populus.

Iuno's own warlike aspect among the Romans is apparent in her attire.
She often appeared armed and wearing a goatskin cloak, which was the
garment favoured by Roman soldiers on campaign. This warlike aspect
was assimilated from the Greek goddess Athena, whose goatskin was
called the aegis. Iuno was called Regina ("queen"). As Iuno Moneta
("she who warns"), she protected the finances of the Roman Empire.
Lucina was an epithet for Juno as "she who brings children into
light". She is the protector and special counselor of the Roman state
and queen of the gods. She is a daughter of Saturn and sister (but
also the wife) of the chief god Iuppiter and the mother of Iuventas,
Mars, and Vulcan.

The name "Minerva" may come from the Indo-European root *men-, from
which "mental" and "mind" are also derived. However, the
non-Indo-European speaking Etruscans had a goddess Menrva, so the name
may be of entirely unknown derivation. Minerva was the daughter of
Iuppiter and Metis. She was considered to be the virgin goddess of
warriors, poetry, medicine, wisdom, commerce, crafts, and the inventor
of music. As Minerva Medica, she was the goddess of medicine and
doctors. Adapting Greek myths about Athena, Romans said that Minerva
was not born in the usual way, but rather sprang fully armed from the
brain of her father; this image has captivated Western writers and
artists through the ages. Ovid called her the "goddess of a thousand
works." Minerva was worshipped throughout Italy, though only in Rome
did she take on a warlike character. Minerva is usually depicted
wearing a coat of mail and a helmet, and carrying a spear. In 207
B.C., a guild of poets and actors was formed to meet and make votive
offerings at the temple of Minerva on the Aventine hill. Among others,
its members included Livius Andronicus. The Aventine sanctuary of
Minerva continued to be an important center of the arts for much of
the middle Roman Republic.


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy (http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/Livy/), Capitoline Hill,
Iuppiter, Minerva, Iuno (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page), also
Encyclopedia Mythica (http://www.pantheon.org/)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37719 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: LUDI Play: Part Five
THE FURTHER ADVENTURES OF M. TEDIUS PRACTIS: PART FOUR

The end of the previous episode:

PECULIA: (covering Loquacia's mouth) I completely agree with you. A
sad occasion this is, do you not agree, Tedius?

PRECARIUS: (poking Tedius in the side) Um...

TEDIUS: (to Precarius) Yes? (quickly turning to Peculia) Yes. (and
back to Precarius) Yes?

PRECARIUS: (points) Look who's coming...

=========================================

PECULIA: Who is that strange-looking couple?

TEDIUS: I am afraid that they are M. Ilicius Auricomus and his
sempiternal sidekick, the medicus called C. (or Cn.) Vassius.

PECULIA: What do you mean by "C. (or Cn.)"? Is he called Gaius or is
his name Gnaeus?

TEDIUS: Nobody seems to know. Apparently, it depends on whether the
person calling out his name is married to him or not...

[Two new characters, AURICOMUS and VASSIUS, appear. AURICOMUS wears a
strange-looking plaided toga and a very strange petasus.]

AURICOMUS: Well, well. Wot's all dis den?

TEDIUS: Excuse me, sir, but I have already conducted the
preliminaries.

AURICOMUS: Ah, Tedius. I hadn't seen you. It's good to know that the
watch is becoming so efficient that now they are even able to reach
the scene before I do. Surprising, to say the least. Dear Vassius,
please take good note.

PECULIA [Softening the grip on Loquacia's mouth, who is anyway too
surprised to speak]: Excuse me, sir, but... who are you?

AURICOMUS: My name, dear lady, is Marcus Ilicius Auricomus,
consulting frumentarius.

PECULIA: Consulting what?

AURICOMUS: Frumentarius, madame.

PECULIA: Does that mean that you go in front of an army looking for
grain?

AURICOMUS: No, madame. Although that is effectively the origin of the
term, a frumentarius is nowadays a different thing. May I take your
surprise as a sign that you haven't heard of the most famous
frumentarius of all times, Marcus Didius Falco?

PECULIA: Who?

AURICOMUS [Unable to hide his complacency]: Excellent. Take good
note, dear Vassius.

[TO BE CONTINUED]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37720 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
A. Ambrosius M. Hortensiae s.d.

Maior wrote:

> M.Hortensia Maior A. Ambrosio salutem dicit;
> Salve; Celetre this is very sad to see. You are cross with
>
> Cato when he posts the calendar

I have absolutely no problem with Cato's calendar as it is NOW
presented. Do you wish me to elaborate on this?

> and now you are giving the pontifices
> a difficult time.

ROFLOL. This is rich coming from you, who have repeatedly called for an
elected CP. Oh, what great changes the removal of you "nefas" status has
wrought in you. It's 0630 now, and I have to stop and finish this later
today, the tears of laughter flooding my eyes make it impossible to see
the monitor.

> Both Gaius Buteo and Quintus Metellus are very active in real
>
> world activities with the Religio, they are trying their best to get
> things started and active with the Religio, so please give that some
> thought.

NR is not the real world? The issue here is sacerdotal negligence in NR,
and not whether Modianus gets his picture on campus newspapers in Ohio.

> Now what are you doing in your part of Pennsylvania for the
> Religio?

Beyond making my neighbors question my sanity, and some family members
fear for my immortal soul? I have work, and ailing 85 yeal-old father, a
dying brother-in-law and a frantic sister to attend to, and those
obligations, and my private rites are enough. Which is why it is galling
that those who claim the public titles do not serve the rites. My
father expects his priest to offer the Divine Liturgy every Sunday. I
expect the same from those who claim a vocation in NR.

> What are you doing in NR?

Nothing, and until there actually IS a public face to the Religio in NR,
officiated by those who have arrogated their titles to themselves, while
shirking their duties, it will stay that way. The only difference
between my nothing and the CP's nothing is that I do not have a title.

> We don't need to institute some kind of punitive system

Then the CP will continue to do nothing. But please understand, I
completely recognize that every single keystroke above, and every one to
follow is futile. There'll be a flurry of activity, a few prayers,
perhaps the next feriae will be celebrated, but so long as the CP is
unaccountable for its dereliction in serving the public rites, the
Religio (in NR) will continue on its moribund way.

> Have you written any rituals for the gods?

I have, and I use them daily in my private rites, and I daresay that
while most are mediocre, I managed to pen several moving ones.

> Have you taken the
> religio course at Academia Thules, and if so are you volunteering to
> help teach others.

I audited it, and have read all the material, but I have not had time to
verify its accuracy. So, in answer to your question, no, I am not
"teaching" the Piscinean corpus.

> I started Sodalitas Diis Inferis and gladly
> transferred owndership to Gaius Buteo Modianus,

This is marvelous.

****
"C. Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

As a Pontifex of Nova Roma I state as an official representative of the
Collegium Pontificum that:

...she has been deemed nefas by the Collegium Pontificum
she is NOT permitted to hold any office (within said Sodalitas Diis
Inferis)
and the Collegium Pontificum has decreed that she, "has rendered herself
unfit
to perform any priestly function." With this in mind, she cannot found
nor
lead any sort of religious Sodalitas. [This is spelled out in the
Decretum on
the Removal of a Sacerdos of the Temple of the Great Mother of the
Gods]."
(from Post #36969)
****
"M. Hortensia Maior G. Fabio Buteo Modiano salutem dicit;
Salve; If you'd actually bothered to go to the webpage
you would see "this is an unofficial sodalitas of Nova Roma".

Also I suggest you read the posts on the Nova Religio
list the kind Pontifex Maximus encouraged the lowly cives to form
these unofficial groups.

I really must speak with some Senators about returning the CP to
it's historic powers during the Republic. Nova Roma is not a
theocracy." (from post 36941)
****
"To: Marca Hortensia Maior
From: C. Fabius Buteo Modianus

...Within Nova Roma you are FORBIDDEN to perform ANY priestly function.
I
am not on the Nova Religio list, this is not a list of the Religio
Romana of
Nova Roma -- as meritorious as the list may be.

Regarding your comment, "I really must speak with some Senators about
returning the CP to it's historic powers during the Republic. Nova Roma
is not a

theocracy." Is this supposed to be some sort of threat? If it is I am
not
in the least intimidated. This is the sort of behavior I would expect
from
someone classified as Nefas." (from post 36951)
****

What was it you said above that nearly choked me to death with laughter?
Oh yes, it was about me giving the pontifices a "difficult time."

But now you are no longer nefas, and Buteo and all the rest of the CP
are your bosom buddies, life-long friends. And why are you no longer
nefas? Because people on this list, and in private (and guess what
Marce, I'm one of those) have been at pains to point out the CP's
hypocrisy. As I am pointing out their negligence.

But none of that matters to you, now, does it? You can get your title
back, and that is all that matters to you.

> everyone there [Sodalitas Diis Inferis]will
> benefit and can speak with G. Buteo who is not only a pontifex but
> also a flamen and augur and making himself and his knowledge
> available.

Buteo Modianus was made group owner on September 3rd. Did he bother to
post an acknowledgment of this fact, or a thank you for being made such?
Has he made even one post in the succeeding 10 days, "making himself and
his knowledge available?" The answer to both questions is no.

> This is the kind of positive activity NR needs for the
> religio. Working together is the only way.

Claiming and holding titles is NOT activity.

Vale


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37721 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
G. Equitius Cato A. Ambrosio Celetro M. Hortensiae Maori quiritibusque
S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Marca Hortensia, no-one (except yourself) could be happier than I am
that you have been cleansed of the taint of being considered "nefas".
Having you declared so was was an over-reaction, and it is to the
benefit of the Republic that it is no longer an issue.

However, unbelievable as it may seem, I agree with Celetrus. I know
that he dislikes me so intensely that my agreeing with him may even
drive him to the other side, but still, the question is not whether or
not we should be "working" together, but one of whether or not the
College of Pontiffs is, in fact, "working" at all.

The only reason the College comes under such scrutiny is because they
have put themselves on a level quite contrary to that in the ancient
Republic, and so have opened themselves up to criticism for not
fulfilling the historic obligations of the pontificate while assuming
unhistoric power. Because we are a "virtual" Republic, the only way
that the College can show evidence of its actions is to post them hear
in the Forum.

Now, I had a contretemps with Cincinnatus Augur about whether he (and
the other pontiffs) have an "obligation" to post their rituals, and he
apparently does not think so. I respectfully disagree with him, but
we have had no further discussion of this. But how else are we to
know? I'm not sure how to resolve this.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37722 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Q. Metellus C. Equitio Catoni am. sal. dic.

[skipping right to the point]

> Now, I had a contretemps with Cincinnatus Augur about whether he (and
> the other pontiffs) have an "obligation" to post their rituals, and he
> apparently does not think so. I respectfully disagree with him, but
> we have had no further discussion of this. But how else are we to
> know? I'm not sure how to resolve this.

Well, I agree that it might be difficult to know when people are really
doing much of anything in the format we are in without its being posted.
Even then, the only possible -- human, that is -- confirmation we have that
it really has been done is to be there ourselves, which may not necessarily
be the case. I'm as yet undecided on the "obligation" to post what has been
(or even will be) done; my gut instinct is to disagree, though I agree that
perhaps our doings should be posted, whether or not the "obligation" exists.

--
Lust, ein paar Euro nebenbei zu verdienen? Ohne Kosten, ohne Risiko!
Satte Provisionen f�r GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37723 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Re: Ludi Romani picture quiz (6)
Idem problema, illustrissima Fabia Livia: imago non fit! Eheu! Fleo lacrimis
acris!

S Pilatus Barbatus



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of C. Fabia Livia
Sent: 13 September 2005 11:49
To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Ludi Romani picture quiz (6)



The picture can be found at:
http://www.livia.org.uk/index.php?link=games

Today's questions are:

1. Who are the two people represented here?

2. What is the date of the statue?


Answers, plus your Roman name, by private email
(c_fabia_livia@...) please, within the next 24
hours.

Livia



___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com



SPONSORED LINKS


Ancient
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=F
all+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire+coin
&c=4&s=108&.sig=fpAyzYW3csq-H8KFAfQSMQ> history

Fall
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+his
tory&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+em
pire+coin&c=4&s=108&.sig=lyFkJ7nHzGWIT0PODMw2Ig> of the roman empire

The
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient
+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roma
n+empire+coin&c=4&s=108&.sig=VlKUg5KX6cBKyXqhfvKKrA> fall of the roman
empire


Roman
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire+coin&w1=Ancient+history&w2
=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire+co
in&c=4&s=108&.sig=R1VJPsQoHxKWUk-7cqk9-Q> empire coin







_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37724 From: Judy Ridgley Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Bless you for this remark. It is so true. No group, organization or state needs negativity. It is a drain to the mind and spirit. Cato, bless you for your work. It is not easy to keep up as you do and may others edify your standard. Gratia tibi ago
Iulla Galerius
----- Original Message -----
From: Maior
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 12:29 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Pontificate


M.Hortensia Maior A. Ambrosio salutem dicit;
Salve; Celetre this is very sad to see. You are cross with
Cato when he posts the calendar and now you are giving the pontifices
a difficult time.
Both Gaius Buteo and Quintus Metellus are very active in real
world activities with the Religio, they are trying their best to get
things started and active with the Religio, so please give that some
thought.
Now what are you doing in your part of Pennsylvania for the
Religio? What are you doing in NR? We don't need to institute some
kind of punitive system, that would really drive anyone away. And we
are all volunteers.
Have you written any rituals for the gods? Have you taken the
religio course at Academia Thules, and if so are you volunteering to
help teach others. I started Sodalitas Diis Inferis and gladly
transferred owndership to Gaius Buteo Modianus,everyone there will
benefit and can speak with G. Buteo who is not only a pontifex but
also a flamen and augur and making himself and his knowledge
available. This is the kind of positive activity NR needs for the
religio. Working together is the only way.
bene vale
Marca Hortensia Mairo



. If you, for your "own part...intend to help
> bring about change," then use your current status to help force our
a -
> llustris CP to "serve the public rites."
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37725 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
A. Ambrosius Celetrus G. Equitio Catoni s.d.

gaiusequitiuscato wrote:

> However, unbelievable as it may seem, I agree with Celetrus. I know
> that he dislikes me so intensely that my agreeing with him may even
> drive him to the other side

:-) This is a transpersonal issue, Equiti. If I abandoned my position
simply because you agreed with it...well, the hypocrisy would make me
worthy of a pontificate. I believe we are in, to our mutual annoyance,
an "unholy alliance."

> but still, the question is not whether or
> not we should be "working" together, but one of whether or not the
> College of Pontiffs is, in fact, "working" at all.

(...)

> Now, I had a contretemps with Cincinnatus Augur about whether he (and
> the other pontiffs) have an "obligation" to post their rituals, and he
>
> apparently does not think so. I respectfully disagree with him, but
> we have had no further discussion of this.

The notion that the "public" rites can be served on a list closed to the
public is both ludicrous and insulting. Of course they are obligated to
post the the public rites to the main list and/or the Religio List. The
flamen Cerialis could find the time to publicly serve and honor Dea
Ceres. The only reason I can fathom why others of the Dii Immortales are
not, why events like the current ludi can begin and continue without
even a nod by the CP in honor of Iuppiter Optimus Maximus, is that no
such rites exist, i.e. not "working at all" applies.

vale


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37726 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-09-13
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
In a message dated 9/13/2005 9:30:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
postumianus@... writes:
Well, I agree that it might be difficult to know when people are really
doing much of anything in the format we are in without its being posted.
Even then, the only possible -- human, that is -- confirmation we have that
it really has been done is to be there ourselves, which may not necessarily
be the case. I'm as yet undecided on the "obligation" to post what has been
(or even will be) done; my gut instinct is to disagree, though I agree that
perhaps our doings should be posted, whether or not the "obligation" exists.
Obligation cuts two ways in this case. The ideal is that People would be
interested in Religio, which was why they joined NR. The sad fact is they
aren't. We used to publish the fact we carrying out rituals. We also encouraged
the people to join in with us. Pontifices and the Pontifex Maximus published
ritual formulas to the main list. We were ignored. So we research more now,
and interact with the public less.

I see us as a large graduate project right now. We mostly translate
documents, argue the validly of sources, share theories and protect the primacy of the
Religio. The original model did not have these limitations, since research
was not needed. All these things were known.

The College is to advise Consules and the Senate in matters pertaining to the
State pacts with the Gods. Our College has the additional burden of back
engineering the Religio, using limited sources and dealing with an uninterested
public. I see this as exciting times for a researcher in the Religio. Every
step we take is a step forward. This is a chance of a lifetime. At least for
me.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37727 From: Lucius Servilius Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: Question
Salvete Omes,

I am a new member preparing to take the citizenship test. My question
is there any particular material I should study or look up to pass the
test. Any information at all will be greatly appreciated.

Valete,

Lucius Servilius Primus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37728 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: Re: Question
Lucius Servilius wrote:
> My question is there any particular material
> I should study or look up to pass the test.

Salve, Luci Servili Prime.

Apart from Nova Romas own website, which contains quite a few facts of
Roma Antiqua, I would recommend the LacusCurtius website:

http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/home.html

It contains a lot of facts, though it isn't always all that easy to
navigate.

But, again, first study Nova Romas own website, especially the parts
concerning Via Romana, the roman way, in the bottom left corner of the
contents-box of the main page.

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37730 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: post. Id. Sept.
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est postridie Idus Septembris; haec dies fastus et ater est.

"Saepe ne utile quidem est scire quid futurum sit." (Often it is not
even advantageous to know what will be) - Cicero

"Accordingly, the following year, when M. Popilius Laenas and Cnaeus
Manlius were the consuls, an army from Tibur marched in the early
hours of the night when all was still against the City of Rome. The
citizens, suddenly aroused from sleep, were alarmed by the danger of a
nocturnal attack and one quite unlooked for, and the alarm was
heightened by their ignorance as to who the enemies were and whence
they came. However, the word quickly passed "To arms"; the gates were
protected by pickets and the walls manned. When the early dawn
revealed a comparatively small force before the walls and the enemy
turned out to be none other than the Tiburtines, the consuls decided
upon an immediate attack. They issued from two separate gates and
attacked the enemy, as they were advancing to the walls, on both
flanks. It soon became obvious that they had been trusting more to the
chances of a surprise than to their own courage, so little resistance
did they offer to the very first onset of the Romans. Their expedition
turned out to be an advantage to the Romans, for the apprehensions
aroused by a war so close to their gates stifled a nascent conflict
between the patricians and the plebs. In the war which followed there
was another hostile incursion, but one more formidable to the country
districts than to the City; the Tarquinians were carrying on their
depredations within the Roman frontiers mainly on the side towards
Etruria. As redress was refused, the new consuls, C. Fabius and C.
Plautius, by order of the people, declared war against them. This
campaign was allotted to Fabius, the one against the Hernici to
Plautius. Rumours of hostilities on the part of the Gauls were
becoming more frequent. Amidst these numerous alarms, however, there
was one consolation - peace had been granted on their request to the
Latins, and a strong contingent was sent by them in accordance with
the old treaty which for many years they had not observed. Now that
the cause of Rome was strengthened by this reinforcement, there was
less excitement created by the news that the Gauls had recently
reached Praeneste and from there had settled in the country round
Pedum. It was decided that C. Sulpicius should be nominated Dictator;
the consul, C. Plautius, was summoned home for the purpose. M.
Valerius was appointed Master of the Horse. They selected the finest
troops out of the two armies which the consuls had commanded and led
them against the Gauls.

The war was somewhat more tedious than was agreeable to either side.
At first it was only the Gauls who were anxious to fight, then the
Romans showed even more alacrity than the Gauls in arming themselves
for action. The Dictator by no means approved of this, since there was
no necessity for him to run any risks. The enemy was daily becoming
weaker by remaining inactive in a disadvantageous position, without
any supplies previously collected, and with no proper entrenchments
thrown up. Their whole strength both of mind and body depended upon
rapid movements, and even a short delay told upon their vigour. For
these reasons the Dictator prolonged the war and announced that he
would inflict severe punishment on any one who fought against orders.
The soldiers grew impatient at this state of things. When on picket or
outpost duty at night, they talked in very disparaging terms about the
Dictator, sometimes they abused the senators generally for not having
given orders that the war should be conducted by consuls. "An
extraordinary commander," they said, "had been selected, one man out
of a thousand, who thought that if he sat still and did nothing
himself, victory would fly down from heaven into his lap." Then they
uttered these sentiments and still more angry ones openly in the
daytime; they declared that they would either fight without waiting
for orders or they would march back in a body to Rome. The centurions
made common cause with the soldiers; the murmurs were not confined to
scattered groups, a general discussion went on in the main
thoroughfares of the camp and in the open space before the
headquarters' tent. The crowd grew to the dimensions of an Assembly,
and shouts were raised from all sides to go at once to the Dictator.
Sextius Tullius was to be spokesman for the army, a position he was
well worthy to fill." - Livy, History of Rome 7.12



"To Anacreon in heaven where he sat in full glee,
A few sons of harmony sent a petition,
That he their inspirer and patron would be,
When this answer arrived from the jolly old Grecian:
Voice, fiddle aud flute, no longer be mute,
I'll lend you my name and inspire you to boot!
And besides I'll instruct you like me to entwine
The myrtle of Venus and Bacchus's vine." - first verse of "To
Anacreon in Heaven", the tune used for "The Star Spangled Banner"

"O say, can you see, by the dawn's early light,
What so proudly we hail'd at the twilight's last gleaming?
Whose broad stripes and bright stars, thro' the perilous fight,
O'er the ramparts we watch'd, were so gallantly streaming?
And the rockets' red glare, the bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof thro' the night that our flag was still there.
O say, does that star-spangled banner yet wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?" - first verse of
"The Star Spangled Banner", the national anthem of the United States
of America

Guarding the entrance to Baltimore harbor via the Patapsco River
during the War of 1812, Fort McHenry faced almost certain attack by
British forces. Major George Armistead, the stronghold's commander,
was ready to defend the fort, but he wanted a flag that would identify
his position, and one whose size would be visible to the enemy from a
distance. Determined to supply such a flag, a committee of
high-ranking officers called on Mary Young Pickersgill, a Baltimore
widow who had had experience making ship flags, and explained that
they wanted a United States flag that measured 30 feet by 42 feet. She
agreed to the job. With the help of her 13-year-old daughter,
Caroline, Mrs. Pickersgill spent several weeks measuring, cutting, and
sewing the 15 stars and stripes. When the time came to sew the
elements of the flag together, they realized that their house was not
large enough. Mrs. Pickersgill thus asked the owner of nearby
Claggett's brewery for permission to assemble the flag on the
building's floor during evening hours. He agreed, and the women worked
by candlelight to finish it. Once completed, the flag was delivered to
the committee, and Mrs. Pickersgill was paid $405.90. In August 1813,
it was presented to Major Armistead, but, as things turned out, more
than a year would pass before hostile forces threatened Baltimore.
After capturing Washington, D.C., and burning some of its public
buildings, the British headed for Baltimore. On the morning of
September 13, 1814, British bomb ships began hurling high-trajectory
shells toward Fort McHenry from positions beyond the reach of the
fort's guns. The bombardment continued throughout the rainy night.

Francis Scott Key, son of an established Maryland family, was born on
August 1, 1779, in western Maryland (Frederick, MD) on the family
estate of "Terra Rubra." He attended grammar school and later
graduated from St. Johns College in Annapolis at age 17. By 1805, Key
had established a law practice in Georgetown, Maryland, and, by 1814,
had appeared many times before the U.S. Supreme Court. The site of his
house on M Street is now a memorial park. Key was a religious man and
was involved in the Episcopal church. Although opposed to the war, he
served for a brief period in the Georgetown Light Field Artillery
(1813-14). During the Battle of Bladensburg, Key assigned field
positions to American troops - a duty he had no expertise in. On
September 13, 1814, Key visited the British fleet in Chesapeake Bay to
secure the release of Dr. William Beanes, who had been captured after
the burning of Washington, DC. The release was secured, but Key was
detained on ship overnight during the shelling of Fort McHenry, one of
the forts defending Baltimore. In the morning, on September 14, he was
so delighted to see the American flag still flying over the fort that
he began a poem to commemorate the occasion. First published under the
title "Defense of Fort M'Henry", the poem soon attained wide
popularity as sung to the tune "To Anacreon in Heaven". The origin of
this tune is obscure, but it may have been written by John Stafford
Smith, a British composer born in 1750. "The Star-Spangled Banner" was
officially made the national anthem by Congress in 1931, although it
already had been adopted as such by the army and the navy.

Today is also known as the Feast of the Exaltation of the Cross; today
used also to be called Holy Rood Day, or Roodmas. Some authorities say
the Catholic Church feast commemorates the restoration of the true
cross to Calvary in A.D. 629, after the victory of Emperor Heraclius
over the Persians. Others say it commemorates the raising of the True
Cross in the church at Jerusalem in 335 (some sources say 326) by the
Empress Helena (Flavia Iulia Helena, also known as Saint Helena and
Helena of Constantinople, c.248 - c.329), mother of St. Constantine
I "the Great". A piece of the True Cross was the most important relic
venerated by the Crusaders. It was kept in the Church of the Holy
Sepulchre under the protection of the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem,
who raised it as a standard of the army before every battle. It was
captured from the Europeans by Salah-ed-din (1137 - March 4, 1193)
during the Battle of Hattin in 1187. The commemoration of this day
began in Jerusalem, and in the Orthodox Church is a Fast day, not a
Feast day.


PERSON OF THE DAY - DEA DIE

Dea Die is a Roman goddess of growth, identified with Ceres. Her
priests were the Fratres Arvales who honored her in the feast of the
Ambarvalia, held in May. During these days, the priests blessed the
fields and made offerings to the powers of the underworld.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy (http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/Livy/), Star Spangled Banner
(http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0873871.html) and
(http://www.150.si.edu/chap3/flag.htm), Dea Die ("Dea Dia."
Encyclopedia Mythica. 2005. Encyclopedia Mythica Online.
14 Sep. 2005 <http://www.pantheon.org/articles/d/dea_dia.html>.)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37731 From: c_fabia_livia@yahoo.co.uk Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: Ludi Romani theatrical quiz (10)
Which playwright sued an actor for mentioning his name on stage?

Answers, plus your Roman name, by private email (c_fabia_livia@...) within the next 24 hours please.

Livia



___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37732 From: c_fabia_livia@yahoo.co.uk Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: Ludi Romani picture quiz (8)
The picture can be found at:
http://www.livia.org.uk/index.php?link=games

Today's questions are:

1. To which god is the sacrifice being made?

2. Who is the artist?

Answers, plus your Roman name, by private email (c_fabia_livia@...) within the next 24 hours please.

Livia



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37733 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
G. Equitius Cato Q. Fabio Maximo A. Ambrosio Celetro Q. Caecilio
Metello Postumiano quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Maximus, it's a positive sign that the quirites are once more
clamoring for news from their religious authorities, is it not?
Should not the pontiffs et al. respond? I am not as acerbic in my
attitude towards the College as Celetrus but I am in full agreement
that the rites and prayers of the religio should be displayed in the
Forum. Metellus, I understand the hesitancy to be put under some kind
of "obligation", but honestly, what other recourse do we have?

Metellus Postumianus, The pontiffs have taken upon themselves all
religious authority (contrary to historic practice) yet they do not
exercize that authority in public save for a few scattered instances.
The old saw that "with great power comes great responsibility" is
both true and applicable here. If the College wants the authority,
let them also shoulder the responsibility. It just seems to be a
logical consequence of assuming that authority.

I wrote on the Religio List:

"The religio does not have the luxury that is afforded Christianity: I
know that somewhere in the world at any given instant the Divine
Liturgy is being celebrated (and/or the Mass is being "offered") on
behalf of the Church Visible and Invisible because it has been done so
for almost two thousand years. In the ancient Republic, the religio
had that presence; now, it *must* be shown in some way to exist so
that practitioners can have the same re-assurance. Without the sure
and certain knowledge that the Roman gods are being...tended to...the
opportunity for devotional expression and expansion in any meaningful
kind of way are relatively slim."

And the question of whether any authoritative structure is necessary
at all in the religio. I think it is, but am interested in hearing
the voices of those most directly affected by it --- i.e., the
practitioners of the religio.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37734 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: Re: Rome Mini-series
A. Apollonius Q. Lanio omnibusque sal.

Catching up with this list, I noticed your question:

> My main question
> is trhe part where a centurion, while inflicting
> punishment on a
> soldier by flogging is also threatening his legion
> with cruxifiction.
>
> Historically:
>
> 1) I know from the military list that a soldier
> could be put to
> death under certain circumstances but I thought
> whipping and
> cruxcifiction were forbidden for Roman citizens. I
> am still waiting
> to find out if this is so.

The flogging of Roman citizens was phased out over the
course of the republic. In the regal period the
traditional punishment for serious offences was
flogging with rods, followed by beheading. This is the
origin of the faces and the securis which the lictores
carried - the fasces were for the flogging, and the
securis was for the beheading. In 509 B.C., the first
year of the republic, it was forbidden for a
magistrate to execute a citizen without allowing the
citizen to appeal to the assembly. It's said that this
rule existed even in the late regal period, and was
merely re-stated in 509.

In 300 the rule was extended to include flogging. But
apparently there was some uncertainty whether the new
rule covered flogging on its own, or only flogging
plus execution. So in the early second century B.C. a
new lex made it clear that flogging a citizen was
subject to provocatio.

All this applied only within the city. This is why the
lictores always removed the securis from their fasces
when they entered the city. But in the early second
century the right of provocatio was extended outside
the city as well. By 122 B.C. it's almost certain that
the flogging of citizens without appeal was forbidden
both inside the city and abroad on military service.

As for crucifixion, that was never used for Roman
citizens. It was a punishment specifically reserved
for slaves. A Roman general who crucified one of his
soldiers, let alone a whole legion, would without
doubt have been prosecuted for treason.

Of course during the imperial period all these rules
slowly broke down, so it's not impossible that such
things could have occurred then. What period was that
scene set in, do you remember?



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37735 From: Quintus Lanius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: Re: Rome Mini-series
Salve A. Apolloni Corde,

Thanks for your research on this which is greatly appreciated!

This story takes place, through the eyes of two common soldiers at
the fall of the republic ie, when Julius Caesar crosses the Rubicon
to take over Rome.


Regards,

Quintus Lanius Paulinus





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@y...> wrote:
> A. Apollonius Q. Lanio omnibusque sal.
>
> Catching up with this list, I noticed your question:
>
> > My main question
> > is trhe part where a centurion, while inflicting
> > punishment on a
> > soldier by flogging is also threatening his legion
> > with cruxifiction.
> >
> > Historically:
> >
> > 1) I know from the military list that a soldier
> > could be put to
> > death under certain circumstances but I thought
> > whipping and
> > cruxcifiction were forbidden for Roman citizens. I
> > am still waiting
> > to find out if this is so.
>
> The flogging of Roman citizens was phased out over the
> course of the republic. In the regal period the
> traditional punishment for serious offences was
> flogging with rods, followed by beheading. This is the
> origin of the faces and the securis which the lictores
> carried - the fasces were for the flogging, and the
> securis was for the beheading. In 509 B.C., the first
> year of the republic, it was forbidden for a
> magistrate to execute a citizen without allowing the
> citizen to appeal to the assembly. It's said that this
> rule existed even in the late regal period, and was
> merely re-stated in 509.
>
> In 300 the rule was extended to include flogging. But
> apparently there was some uncertainty whether the new
> rule covered flogging on its own, or only flogging
> plus execution. So in the early second century B.C. a
> new lex made it clear that flogging a citizen was
> subject to provocatio.
>
> All this applied only within the city. This is why the
> lictores always removed the securis from their fasces
> when they entered the city. But in the early second
> century the right of provocatio was extended outside
> the city as well. By 122 B.C. it's almost certain that
> the flogging of citizens without appeal was forbidden
> both inside the city and abroad on military service.
>
> As for crucifixion, that was never used for Roman
> citizens. It was a punishment specifically reserved
> for slaves. A Roman general who crucified one of his
> soldiers, let alone a whole legion, would without
> doubt have been prosecuted for treason.
>
> Of course during the imperial period all these rules
> slowly broke down, so it's not impossible that such
> things could have occurred then. What period was that
> scene set in, do you remember?
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all
new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37736 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: Re: Lex de provocatione vote results
A. Apollonius P. Memmio diribitoribus custodibus
omnibus sal.

Still catching up!

I can't help noticing the long delay between the
closing of the polls in this vote and the delivery of
the results. By my reckoning it was a gap of 17 days.
The lex Fabia requires the results to be delivered to
the presiding magistrate within two days (48 hours) of
the close of polls, and requires the presiding
magistrate to announce the results within one day (24
hours) thereafter.

I know last year when I was rogator (as it then was)
we sometimes exceeded the deadlines by an hour or two,
and on one occasion we were even a couple of days late
when there was a very serious case of electoral fraud
which had to be investigated and resolved before the
results could be verified. But exceeding the deadline
by two weeks is really something.

I don't want to take any scalps for this - it's a very
hard job, and this vote came at a very inconvenient
time, at the height of the holiday season. But this is
a very dramatic falling-short, and clearly some
lessons need to be learned from it. This is especially
true since this is the first year of a new arrangement
of vote-counting magistrates, with the diribitores now
being supervised by the custodes. I'm sure I wasn't
the only one who suspected that these new arrangements
might require a slight extension of the current legal
deadlines for delivering results.

If this was caused by institutional flaws in the new
arrangements, we need to know about it so that the
necessary changes can be made. If it was simply a
one-off breakdown of procedures, it needs to be
explained so that future diribitores, custodes, and
presiding magistrates can take steps to avoid similar
problems.

In short, please don't think that I'm seeking to have
anyone dragged over the coals; but I would ask the
diribitores, the custodes, and the presiding
magistrate to get together and give us just a brief
report on what went wrong and what steps need to be
taken to ensure it doesn't happen again.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37737 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: Re: Rome Mini-series
In a message dated 9/14/2005 7:00:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
a_apollonius_cordus@... writes:
Of course during the imperial period all these rules
slowly broke down, so it's not impossible that such
things could have occurred then. What period was that
scene set in, do you remember?
Late 45 BCE, based on the flow of events.

Q Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37738 From: Doris Date: 2005-09-14
Subject: The Imperial Eagles Need Help
Friends,

Without powerful intervention, the Roman Imperial Eagle, aquila
heliaca, is doomed to become extinct as a free species within our
very lifetimes. The living birds are counted in hundreds, not
thousands, and they are holding out in some of the most remote
locations, such as Bulgaria and Siberia.

People naturally cry out: Surely someone is DOING "something" about
this; the virtual extinction of one of the most significant and
honored birds known to Western Civilization for over 2,000 years,
within our mortal lifespan.

A few under-funded and beleaguered individuals are indeed doing what
we can with what we have!

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aquilaheliaca/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RREPMR/?yguid=164345709

We are assorted conservationists, historians, antiquarians,
volunteersÂ… you name it!

Some of our folks are "on the ground", protecting the very few viable
nests from poachers at great risk to their lives.

I have seen undercover film of the illegal traffic in the noble
raptors – very popular as status symbols for gangsters, terrorists,
criminals, etc. Most of the birds die in captivity. They are
transported illegally with their eyelids crudely sewn shut with twine.

I am posting this to many groups and individuals. I am not really
asking for your money. I am asking you to spread this information
far and wide every way you can think of. Yes, there is great need
for funding to sponsor individual birds and veterinary care. But
more importantly, please spread this far and wide. Extinction is
Forever.

--Doris Butler
AKA Sabina Equitia Doris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37739 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: a.d. XVII Kal. Oct.
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem XVII Kalendas Octobris; haec dies nefastus est.

"Timendi causa est nescire." (Ignorance is the cause of fear) - Seneca

"Accordingly, the following year, when M. Popilius Laenas and Cnaeus
Manlius were the consuls, an army from Tibur marched in the early
hours of the night when all was still against the City of Rome. The
citizens, suddenly aroused from sleep, were alarmed by the danger of a
nocturnal attack and one quite unlooked for, and the alarm was
heightened by their ignorance as to who the enemies were and whence
they came. However, the word quickly passed "To arms"; the gates were
protected by pickets and the walls manned. When the early dawn
revealed a comparatively small force before the walls and the enemy
turned out to be none other than the Tiburtines, the consuls decided
upon an immediate attack. They issued from two separate gates and
attacked the enemy, as they were advancing to the walls, on both
flanks. It soon became obvious that they had been trusting more to the
chances of a surprise than to their own courage, so little resistance
did they offer to the very first onset of the Romans. Their expedition
turned out to be an advantage to the Romans, for the apprehensions
aroused by a war so close to their gates stifled a nascent conflict
between the patricians and the plebs. In the war which followed there
was another hostile incursion, but one more formidable to the country
districts than to the City; the Tarquinians were carrying on their
depredations within the Roman frontiers mainly on the side towards
Etruria. As redress was refused, the new consuls, C. Fabius and C.
Plautius, by order of the people, declared war against them. This
campaign was allotted to Fabius, the one against the Hernici to
Plautius. Rumours of hostilities on the part of the Gauls were
becoming more frequent. Amidst these numerous alarms, however, there
was one consolation - peace had been granted on their request to the
Latins, and a strong contingent was sent by them in accordance with
the old treaty which for many years they had not observed. Now that
the cause of Rome was strengthened by this reinforcement, there was
less excitement created by the news that the Gauls had recently
reached Praeneste and from there had settled in the country round
Pedum. It was decided that C. Sulpicius should be nominated Dictator;
the consul, C. Plautius, was summoned home for the purpose. M.
Valerius was appointed Master of the Horse. They selected the finest
troops out of the two armies which the consuls had commanded and led
them against the Gauls.

The war was somewhat more tedious than was agreeable to either side.
At first it was only the Gauls who were anxious to fight, then the
Romans showed even more alacrity than the Gauls in arming themselves
for action. The Dictator by no means approved of this, since there was
no necessity for him to run any risks. The enemy was daily becoming
weaker by remaining inactive in a disadvantageous position, without
any supplies previously collected, and with no proper entrenchments
thrown up. Their whole strength both of mind and body depended upon
rapid movements, and even a short delay told upon their vigour. For
these reasons the Dictator prolonged the war and announced that he
would inflict severe punishment on any one who fought against orders.
The soldiers grew impatient at this state of things. When on picket or
outpost duty at night, they talked in very disparaging terms about the
Dictator, sometimes they abused the senators generally for not having
given orders that the war should be conducted by consuls. "An
extraordinary commander," they said, "had been selected, one man out
of a thousand, who thought that if he sat still and did nothing
himself, victory would fly down from heaven into his lap." Then they
uttered these sentiments and still more angry ones openly in the
daytime; they declared that they would either fight without waiting
for orders or they would march back in a body to Rome. The centurions
made common cause with the soldiers; the murmurs were not confined to
scattered groups, a general discussion went on in the main
thoroughfares of the camp and in the open space before the
headquarters' tent. The crowd grew to the dimensions of an Assembly,
and shouts were raised from all sides to go at once to the Dictator.
Sextius Tullius was to be spokesman for the army, a position he was
well worthy to fill." - Livy, History of Rome 7.12


"Voice of Athena, dearest to me of the gods, how clearly, though you
are unseen, do I hear your call and snatch its meaning in my mind." -
Odysseus, in Sophocles, "Ajax" 14

"There was no mother who gave me birth; and in all things, except for
marriage, wholeheartedly I am for the male and entirely on the
father's side. Therefore, I will not award greater honor to the death
of a woman who killed her husband, the master of the house." - Athena
to the court, in Aeschylus, "Eumenides" 734

"If you always greatly honor with kindness the kindly ones, you will
surely be preeminent, keeping your land and city in the straight path
of justice." - Athena, in Aeschylus, "Eumenides" 992



In ancient Greece, today was honored as the birthday of Athena. In
the Olympian pantheon, Athena was remade as the favorite daughter of
Zeus, born by parthenogenesis from his forehead, the culmination of
his Olympian ascendancy over the matriarchal Great Goddess of the
earlier culture. Her birth is told in other versions. In one, Zeus lay
with Metis, the goddess of crafty thought, but immediately feared the
consequences. It had been prophesied that Metis would bear children
more powerful than Zeus himself. In order to forestall these dire
consequences, Zeus transformed Metis into a fly and swallowed her
immediately after lying with her. He was too late: Metis had already
conceived a child. Metis immediately began making a helmet and robe
for her fetal daughter. The hammering as she made the helmet caused
Zeus great pain and Prometheus, Hephaestus, Hermes or Palaemon
(depending on the sources examined) cleaved Zeus's head with the
double-headed Minoan axe (labrys). Athena leaped from Zeus's head,
fully grown and armed, and Zeus was none the worse for the experience.

Athena was patron of the art of weaving and other crafts, wisdom and
battle. Unlike Ares, who was hot-headed and undependable in battle,
Athena's domain was strategy and tactics. Having taken the side of the
Greeks in the war against Troy, Athena assisted the wily Odysseus on
his journey home. Homer's most common epithet for Athena, "glaukopis"
is usually translated "bright-eyed" and is a combination of "glaukos"
(which can be translated as "gleaming," "silvery," and later as
"bluish-green" or "gray") and "ops" - "eye," or sometimes, "face". It
is interesting to note that "glaux" - owl is from the same root,
presumably because of its own distinctive eyes. The bird which sees in
the night is closely associated with the goddess of wisdom: in archaic
images, she is frequently depicted with an owl perched on her head. In
earlier times, Athena may well have been a bird goddess, similar to
Lilitu and/or the goddess depicted with owls, wings and bird talons on
the Burney relief. In her role as judge at Orestes' trial on the
murder of his mother, Clytemnestra (which he won), Athena won the
epithet "Athena Areia." Athena was often associated with the local
Aeginian goddess, Aphaea. She had the epithet "Athena Ergane" as the
patron of craftsmen and artisans.

She was often referred to with the epithet "Pallas Athena". Pallas was
an ambiguous figure, sometimes male sometimes female, never imagined
apart from Athena. She killed Pallas by mistake, and ever after wore
her/his goatskin fringed with chthonic serpents, as the protective
aegis. With the epithet "Athena Parthenos" ("virgin"), Athena was
worshipped at the Parthenon. With the epithet "Athena Promachos" she
led in battle. With the epithet "Athena Polias" ("of the city"),
Athena was the protectress of Athens and the Acropolis.

In the Homeric Hymns and in Hesiod's Theogony, she is described with
the curious epithet "Tritogeneia." The exact meaning of this term is
unclear. It seems to mean "Triton-born," perhaps indicating that the
sea-god Triton was her father according to some early myths, or that
she was born near Lake Triton in Africa. Another possible meaning is
"triple-born" or "third-born", which may refer to her status as the
third daughter of Zeus.

Athena competed with Poseidon to be the patron deity of Athens. They
agreed that each would give the Athenians one gift and the Athenians
would choose whichever gift they preferred. Poseidon struck the ground
with his trident and a spring sprung up; the water was salty and not
very useful, whereas Athena offered them the first domesticated olive
tree. The Athenians (or their king, Cecrops) accepted the olive tree
and along with it Athena as their patron, for the olive tree brought
wood, oil and food. This is thought to remember a clash between the
inhabitants during Mycenaean times and newer immigrants. It is
interesting to note that Athens at its height was a significant sea
power, defeating the Persian fleet at the Battle of Salamis near
Salamis Island in 480 BC. Athena was also the patron goddess of
several other cities, notably Sparta. In an alternate version,
Poseidon invents the first horse.

According to Apollodorus, Hephaestus attempted to rape Athena but was
unsuccessful. His semen fell on the ground, and Erichthonius was born
from the earth. Athena then raised the baby as a foster mother.
Alternatively, the semen landed on Athena's leg, and she wiped it off
with a piece of wool which she tossed on the ground. Erichthonius
arose from the ground and the wool. Another version says that
Hephaestus wanted Athena to marry him but she disappeared on his
bridal bed; he ejaculated onto the ground instead. Athena gave three
sisters, Herse, Pandrosus and Aglaulus the baby in a small box and
warned them to never open it. Aglaulus and Herse opened the box which
contained the infant and future-king, Erichthonius. The sight caused
Herse and Aglaulus to go insane and they threw themselves off the
Acropolis.

Athena was adopted by the Romans and became Minerva, the goddess of
wisdom, medicine, the arts, dyeing, science and trade, but also of
war. As Minerva Medica she is the patroness of physicians. She is the
daughter of Iuppiter. In the temple on the Capitoline Hill she was
worshipped together with Iuppiter and Iuno, with whom she formed the
powerful Capitoline Triad. Another temple of hers was located on the
Aventine Hill. The church of Santa Maria sopra Minerva is built on one
of her temples. Every year from March 19 - 23 the Quinquatria was
held, the primary Minerva-festival. This festival was mainly
celebrated by artisans but also by students.

Valete bene!

Cato



"It took me fifteen years to discover that I had no talent for
writing, but I couldn't give it up because by then I was too
famous."
- Robert Benchley, American humourist born on September 15, 1889,
grandfather of Peter Benchley, author of "Jaws"


SOURCES

Livy (http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/Livy/), Athena
(http://www.pantheon.org/areas/mythology/europe/greek/articles.html),
and (http://homepage.mac.com/cparada/GML/Athena.html) and
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athena), Minerva
(http://www.pantheon.org/areas/mythology/europe/roman/articles.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37740 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Imperial Eagles Need Help
G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Sabinae Equitiae Doris omnibusque SPD.

I'm posting below an article from our local newspaper, which has
some interesting details on eagles. It was submitted by North
Island Wildlife Recovery Centre here on Insula Vancouver, Regio
Columbia, Canada Occidentalis. The Centre does a fair bit of
work with raptors.

It was published on September 2, but now seems the perfect time
to post it, in conjunction with Doris's post.

In homage to Deus Horus.
Vale, et valete in pace Deorum.

G.Aurelia Falconis Silvana
--------------------------------------------------------------------

BEYOND THE BEAK OF A BIRD
By Sylvia Campbell / North Island Wildlife Recovery Centre.

At the wildlife centre we have a skeleton of an eagle on display.
It surprises people to see how small the frame of an eagle is
when all the feathers are gone. The skeleton of a bird is
designed both for strength and lightness and is adapted for
flight, walking and running. The bones are slender, hollow,
air-filled and porous.

They contain air rather than marrow and are connected to the
respiratory organs. If air is blown into the upper arm or
thighbone of a fresh-killed bird, the air escapes through the
bill of the bird and may even produce a musical note in the
bird's throat.

Air sacs and pneumaticity of the bones (having air filled
cavities) vary in different species of birds. For instance,
the bones of diving birds have much less air in their bones
to decrease buoyancy.

The skull of a bird is light and is made up of a rounded brain
case, roof of the mouth, jaws and palate. The vertebra is
very flexible and has varying lengths in the neck. Man has
only seven neck vertebrae but some birds like the common
pigeon [have] 14, swans 25, geese 19, ducks 16 or 17 and
hummingbirds 14 or 15.

The forepart of the bird is similar to a human skeleton but as
you continue down the vertebrae has 4 - 9 moveable tailbones,
important for flight.

The sternum or breastbone protects the chest and part of the
belly of a bird against physical blows. The keel strenghtens
the sternum and gives extra space for the attachment of the
flight muscles. Birds such as ostrich or emu, which are flight-
less, have a flat, unkeeled sternum.

An arch of bones called the pectoral girdle gives support to
the wings of a bird. These . . . strong bones are among the
heaviest in the bird's body.

I have always wondered what role a wishbone or furucula plays
other than making a wish. Apparently a wishbone is equivalent
to that of the collarbone in humans. The angle or width of the
wishbone is generally widest in birds of strong flight, with
each clavicle serving as a strut to brace the wings apart.
A bird cannot fly if one side of the furucula is brken.

The shoulder blade points backward above the ribs and parallel
to the backbone. At the point of the attachment of the shoulder
blade is a socket called the glenoid cavity. The humerus or
wing bone fits into this cavity.

The humerus is comparable to that section of a man's arm between
the shoulders and elbow. The radius is the next section outward,
or downward, in the wing of a bird and comparable to a man's
forearm.

This is composed of two bones called the radius and ulna. The
humerus, radius and ula are the bones we see broken most often
in birds.

The next section of the wing is called the wrist with reduced
fingers, which bears the primary flight feathers.

I have given you a quick rundown of the skeleton of a bird.
It is a very complex and extraordinary system. We have
diagrams of a bird's skeleton at the Centre if you would like
to pick one up.

If you would like more information about wildlife or North Island
Wildlife Recovery Centre, plese call us at (1) 250 - 248 - 8534.
The centre is open 9-5 daily for public viewing until the end
of October.
--------------------------------------------------------------------





-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Doris" <doris-butler@s...> wrote:
> Friends,
>
> Without powerful intervention, the Roman Imperial Eagle, aquila
> heliaca, is doomed to become extinct as a free species within our
> very lifetimes. The living birds are counted in hundreds, not
> thousands, and they are holding out in some of the most remote
> locations, such as Bulgaria and Siberia.
>
> <snip>
>
> A few under-funded and beleaguered individuals are indeed doing what
> we can with what we have!
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aquilaheliaca/
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RREPMR/?yguid=164345709
>
<snip>
> I am posting this to many groups and individuals. I am not really
> asking for your money. I am asking you to spread this information
> far and wide every way you can think of. Yes, there is great need
> for funding to sponsor individual birds and veterinary care. But
> more importantly, please spread this far and wide. Extinction is
> Forever.
>
> --Doris Butler
> AKA Sabina Equitia Doris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37741 From: c_fabia_livia@yahoo.co.uk Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Ludi Romani theatrical quiz (11)
Which two actors frequently watched and studied the speeches of Q. Hortensius Hortalus?

Answers, plus your Roman name, by private email (c_fabia_livia@...) within the next 24 hours please.

Livia



___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37742 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
A. Ambrosius Celetrus G. Equitio Catoni s.p.d.

Me, acerbic? As in bitter or harsh? Don't answer that :-)

I am harsh because the underlying attitude of the CP is "we can do want
we want, we are unaccountable, we are inviolate." What is the basis for
this attitude?

Once upon a time, within a virtual pomerium far, far away, Nova Roma was
founded to bring the Religio back to life. Of necessity, the first
priests had to appoint themselves. But they declared their appointments
sacrosanct, established themselves as an arbitrary theocracy, and now
they feel they can ignore their duties to the Gods, in order to pursue
their "studies."

And where has your civility gotten you, Equiti? You asked, "Maximus,
it's a positive sign that the quirites are once more clamoring for news
from their religious authorities, is it not? Should not the pontiffs et
al. respond?"

Has he deigned to respond to your legitimate question? Has Metellus
responded to "Metellus, I understand the hesitancy to be put under some
kind of "obligation", but honestly, what other recourse do we have?"

The answer is no in both instances. The CP is adopting their primary
strategy for dealing with criticism - ignore it until it goes away. This
is why civil sanctions MUST be created to address sacerdotal
malfeasance.

> Obligation cuts two ways in this case.

No, it does not. The CP serves and honors the Gods, not public opinion.

> The ideal is that People would be interested in Religio, which was why
> they joined NR. The sad fact is they
> aren't.

Catholic, Orthodox and Anglican priests do not check to see how many
people are in church before they honor God by serving Christian public
rites. The Ara Pacis was enclosed "within an almost square walled
precinct which measured 34'5" x 38' x 23' (10.5m x 11.6m x 7m)" (Adkins
& Adkins, "Dictionary of Roman Religion," 1996, pg.16). How many of the
Roman "People" could attend any given ceremony there? Are we to believe,
as Maximus would have it, that the Gods were honored if and only if an
audience threshold number was exceeded?

The entire Main List could unsubscribe tonight, save for a lone
Rastafarian Taoist only passingly interested in the Religio Romana, and
it would still be incumbent on the CP ot "serve the public rites" the
next time they are called for.

> We used to publish the fact we carrying out rituals. We also
> encouraged
> the people to join in with us. Pontifices and the Pontifex Maximus
> published ritual formulas to the main list.

The main list archives only go back to November 2755. The first public
festival on the record should have been, therefor, the festival for
Neptune on Kalendis Decembribus. It was ignored, although Pontifex
Maximus did see fit to post about chariot racing (one wonders just what
he studies in the quiet of the CP).

The Religio list archives extend back further. The first posted ritual I
can find was for Kalendis Martiis, 2753. As far as I can tell, tit was
NOT written or offered by a pontiff or priest. One year later, there was
NO ceremony on Kalendis Martiis, so presumably this Hesiodic Golden Age
in which the CP publicly honored the Dii Immortales lasted but a year.

> We were ignored. So we research more now,
> and interact with the public less.

Read, "our vanity wasn't served, so we gathered up our pateras and went
home," and this statement made by Maximus Post 37091,

"I remember an earlier Nova Roma where everybody just did their job, and
no
one expected props for doing so." Perhaps one day we shall return to
that,"

is utterly specious.

> I see us as a large graduate project right now. We mostly translate
> documents, argue the validly of sources, share theories and protect
> the primacy of the Religio.

The primary, fundamental, irreducibly intrinsic role of the Collegium
Pontificum of Nova Roma is to see that the Gods and Goddess are honored
and the PUBLIC rites are served.

Vale


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37743 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: Rome Mini-series
A. Apollonius Q. Lanio omnibusque sal.

> Thanks for your research on this which is greatly
> appreciated!

No problem; in this case it was stuff I knew already,
so no extra work was required. :)

> This story takes place, through the eyes of two
> common soldiers at
> the fall of the republic ie, when Julius Caesar
> crosses the Rubicon
> to take over Rome.

Hmm. It was a pretty lawless period (Caesar himself
was on the run from a charge of majestas), so it's
conceivable that a general could have got away with
flogging a soldier. But there's no way he'd have been
able to crucify his entire legion, and frankly I doubt
any of his soldiers would have taken such a threat
seriously. What, was he going to erect several
thousand wooden crosses and tie several thousand
soldiers to them with his own bare hands? Not likely.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37744 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: Lex de provocatione vote results
Salve
I think the problem was that tribunus Albucius was on vacation at the time
of the result being known and impossibilitated to actually send the report
on the list by the lack of internet connection, while no one of the other
Tribunes ever got the results (as I think is normal? Only the magistrate
presiding the Comitia get them, I think).
If so, I'd say the matter was pretty much an incident, more than a real
case.
Vale
Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis Iterum

On 9/14/05, A. Apollonius Cordus <a_apollonius_cordus@...> wrote:
>
> A. Apollonius P. Memmio diribitoribus custodibus
> omnibus sal.
>
> Still catching up!
>
> I can't help noticing the long delay between the
> closing of the polls in this vote and the delivery of
> the results. By my reckoning it was a gap of 17 days.
> The lex Fabia requires the results to be delivered to
> the presiding magistrate within two days (48 hours) of
> the close of polls, and requires the presiding
> magistrate to announce the results within one day (24
> hours) thereafter.
>
> I know last year when I was rogator (as it then was)
> we sometimes exceeded the deadlines by an hour or two,
> and on one occasion we were even a couple of days late
> when there was a very serious case of electoral fraud
> which had to be investigated and resolved before the
> results could be verified. But exceeding the deadline
> by two weeks is really something.
>
> I don't want to take any scalps for this - it's a very
> hard job, and this vote came at a very inconvenient
> time, at the height of the holiday season. But this is
> a very dramatic falling-short, and clearly some
> lessons need to be learned from it. This is especially
> true since this is the first year of a new arrangement
> of vote-counting magistrates, with the diribitores now
> being supervised by the custodes. I'm sure I wasn't
> the only one who suspected that these new arrangements
> might require a slight extension of the current legal
> deadlines for delivering results.
>
> If this was caused by institutional flaws in the new
> arrangements, we need to know about it so that the
> necessary changes can be made. If it was simply a
> one-off breakdown of procedures, it needs to be
> explained so that future diribitores, custodes, and
> presiding magistrates can take steps to avoid similar
> problems.
>
> In short, please don't think that I'm seeking to have
> anyone dragged over the coals; but I would ask the
> diribitores, the custodes, and the presiding
> magistrate to get together and give us just a brief
> report on what went wrong and what steps need to be
> taken to ensure it doesn't happen again.
>
>
--


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37745 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Edictum Censoris CFQ XXXVIII de Approbationibus (Censorial Edict f
Ex Officio Censoris Senioris Caesonis Fabii Buteoni Quintiliani

Edictum Censoris CFQ XXXVIII

Edictum Censoris CFQ XXXVII de Approbationibus
(Censorial Edict from Censor Caeso Fabius Quintilianus XXXVII dealing
with approvals)

Preamble
This edictum repeals and replaces the "Edictum Censoris CFQ XXII de
Approbationibus". It is an "updated" version of "Edictum Censoris CFQ
XXII de Approbationibus", based on the experiences that the Censores
and their Scribae have had during the last months and it clarifies
some terms and some procedures.

For the purpose of this Edictum, and as per the "Constitution", the
"Lex Labiena de Gentibus" and the "Lex Equitia de Familia", the
Familia is recognised as the basic unit of society in Nova Roma.

"Definitions: This edict uses the definitions provided by the
constitution and the laws of Nova Roma and the Censores has practized
and will as a result of that practise the following working
application of the terms "familia", "domus" and "gens" which are
included in this edictum to help citizens understand the implications
of these terms.

A familia is defined by the "Lex Equitia de Familia" and is composed
of a paterfamilias or materfamilias or two persons in a free
marriage, and all the people under his/her/their potestas who are
called filii/filiaefamilias. In a word the pater or materfamilias
have legal oversight and responsibility on many things that a
filius/filiafamilias can do.

A domus regroups ALL the people who share a common nomen-cognomen
combination. There is no head of a domus.

A gens is composed of many different domus that share the same nomen.
There is no head of a gens.

This Edictum spells out the procedures that the Censores will follow
in dealing with the approval of prospective citizens to Nova Roma.

I. Introduction
I.1. This Edictum is based on:

"Lex Labiena de Gentibus":
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2003-12-24-ii.html
and "Lex Equitia de Familia":
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2004-10-07-vii.html
and the repealed "Edictum Censoris CFQ XXII de Approbationibus":
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/edictum_XXII.htm

This edictum takes into consideration the fact that Familiae are now
the basic social units of Nova Roma. As such Pater/Materfamilias are
now head of Familiae (natural or adopted) and not Gentes as was
previously the case.
I.2. This Edictum takes the Lex Equitia De Tirocinio Civium Novorum
into consideration and confirms the probationary period of 90
(ninety) days before Nova Roman citizenship can entitle the
prospective citizen to vote and stand for office.
I.3. This Edictum confirms the fact that there are no heads of Gentes
(previously known as Pater/Materfamiliares) any more. Whoever was
head of a particular gens before the Lex Equitia de Familia came into
force (January 29th, 2004) cannot approve or reject the application
of a prospective citizen to join this particular Gens any more."

II. Approval authority and naming practice
At the application stage, the authority to approve a prospective
citizen is either given to existing citizens who belong to a Familia
(or a Domus) or to the Rogatores, acting on behalf of the Censores,
depending on the wishes of the prospective citizen to join a Familia,
a Domus or a Gens. Each option (joining a Familia/Domus or a Gens)
will have a bearing on the name that a prospective citizen can choose.

II.1. Approval authority in a Familia or in a Domus
II.1.1. Censorial issues related to the Familia and the Domus in Nova Roma.
Each Familia duly registered with the censorial office will be headed
by a Pater/Materfamilias chosen as per the recommendations found in
Lex Labiena de Gentibus.

Each Domus in a gens duly registered with the censorial office will
be confirmed in its position by the right of using a reserved and
specific cognomen within that Gens.

II.1.2. Approval authority.

A prospective citizen may choose to join a Domus, effectively
choosing a name with a nomen-cognomen combination that already exists
(i.e. used by an existing domus) in Nova Roma, under the following
conditions.

- The prospective citizen can be considered a close relative of the
members of the domus and as such be allowed to form his/her own
Familia within the domus with the status of Sui Iuris. In this case
however, the creation of a new familia within the Domus is subject to
the unanimous acceptance of all the patres/matresfamilias of the
Domus.

OR

- The prospective citizen can apply to become the
filius/filiafamilias (under the provision of Lex Equitia de Familia)
of one pater/materfamilias whose familia belongs to the domus in
question. The censores reserve the right to request in depth
information about real life connections before allowing a prospective
citizen to fall under the potestas of a pater/materfamilias. Approval
of both the pater/materfamilias AND of the censores is necessary in
this case and can never be guaranteed.

This point does _not_ affect the rules governing the adoption
procedures related to existing citizens as per "Edictum Censoris CFQ
XXI de Nominibus", "Edictum Censoris CFQ XXIV de Nominibus
Adoptatorum" and "Lex Equitia de Familia".

II.1.3. The duty of the Pater/Mater Familias in guiding prospective Citizens.

As the persons responsible to welcome new citizens into their Familia
and their Domus, the Patres/Matresfamilias have the duty to help and
support the prospective citizens in their choice of name, following
the laws and edicta that guide such selection, before the familial
approval reaches the censorial office.

Should it come to the attention of the Rogatores and the Censores
that a Pater/Materfamilias repeatedly approves prospective citizens
with incorrect names (as defined in Edictum Censoris Quintiliani de
Nominibus), a censorial inquiry may be launched as to why that is. If
no satisfactory explanation is provided, the Censores may issue a
public reprimand against the said Pater/Materfamilias for
non-adherence to Nova Roman practice as defined by the laws and
edicta of Nova Roma.


II.2. Approval authority in a gens.

II.2.1. Censorial issues related to the Gens in Nova Roma.

Although members of a particular Gens may wish to organise themselves
as they see fit, for the purpose of this Edictum and in accordance
with Lex Labiena de Gentibus the Censores do not recognise the
authority of a head of a Gens as far as approving citizens is
concerned.

Building on the above point, closed Gentes are now abolished as
prospective citizens are in theory free to join any Gens they wish as
opposed to officially recognised Familiae or Domus that are allowed
to present possible restrictive entry conditions.

II.2.2. Approval authority.
Any prospective citizen may choose the Gens of his choice providing
he/she doesn't seek to belong to an already existing Domus or
Familia. In the latter case approval authority falls within the
rights and duties of a Patres/Matresfamilias in cooperation with the
Censores as stated in II.1.2.

The Censores and the Rogatores will hold the ultimate authority to
approve or reject prospective citizens seeking admission in a Gens
but not in a recognised Domus or Familia, where they still have an
important responsibility.

III. This Edictum becomes effective immediately.

Given the 15th of September, in the year of the Consulship of
Franciscus Apulus Caesar and Gaius Popillius Laenas, 2758 AUC.

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Senior Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37746 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
G. Equitius Cato A. Ambrosio Celetro quiritibusque S.P.D.

<Aulus.Ambrosius.Celetrus@a...> wrote:

> Me, acerbic? As in bitter or harsh? Don't answer that :-)

CATO: MMPHMPHMMMPH

Well, Celetrus, I agree with you in the essentials; it's how to bring
about a sea-change of direction with the College of Pontiffs that is
the meat of this issue, and frankly I think that taking a somewhat
milder tone might produce results more rapidly.

The College of Pontiffs exists solely to offer the rites of the
religio for the benefit of the Republic.

As a virtual community, the only way for the broadest audience within
the Republic to be reached is via this Forum.

Therefore, in order to offer the rites of the religio for the Republic
in a way that the public can "experience" and/or learn from them it is
necessary to post them in this Forum.

It seems pretty simple. But it can be said in a nice way, with smiles
and encouragement and hearty claps on the back, instead of a
pointy-sticks-in-the-eyeballs kind of way. I'd simply advocate taking
the former course over the latter.

Or we could play good vigiles/bad vigiles.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37747 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
In a message dated 9/15/2005 6:39:03 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
Aulus.Ambrosius.Celetrus@... writes:

Has he deigned to respond to your legitimate question?

I must have missed the legitimate question...



The answer is no in both instances. The CP is adopting their primary
strategy for dealing with criticism - ignore it until it goes away. This
is why civil sanctions MUST be created to address sacerdotal
malfeasance.


Oh I'd love to see this. It would mean that the populace actually cares.

Your point about the one rabid Rastafarin is well taken. However I do know
of
missionaries that pulled up stakes, when their diocese ignored them.

We deal with criticism. We have no primary strategy to do with ignoring
people.
And I would appreciate it if you not put words in the College's mouth.

Q. Fabius Maximus
if you not try


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37748 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
A. Apollonius C. Equitio omnibusque sal.

> The College of Pontiffs exists solely to offer the
> rites of the
> religio for the benefit of the Republic.

Allow me to slightly complicate your nicely simple
picture, amice... ;)

Historically, the pontifices were also responsible for
ruling on questions of religious law when asked to do
so by the senate, and indeed when consulted by private
individuals (one pontifex each year was put in charge
of giving religious and legal advice to members of the
public). They also supervised and assisted the civil
magistrates in carrying out their religious duties.

But most of these responsibilities seem to derive from
their basic purpose, which is, as you say, to see to
it that the populus upholds its end of the contractual
relationship with the gods.





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37749 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
G. Equitius Cato A. Apollonio Cordo quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Corde, you wrote:

> Historically, the pontifices were also responsible for
> ruling on questions of religious law when asked to do
> so by the senate, and indeed when consulted by private
> individuals (one pontifex each year was put in charge
> of giving religious and legal advice to members of the
> public). They also supervised and assisted the civil
> magistrates in carrying out their religious duties.

Even more reason to support a request that the pontiffs become more
active in the daily life of the citizens. Where is the "assist[ance]"
to the magistrates? I was never actually inaugurated as a quaestor,
yet here I am, quaestor-ing like crazy, without "supervis[ion]" or any
kind of guidance whatsoever from our religious authorities.

Unless I am gravely mistaken (and I'm always open to the possibility),
not a single magistrate for the year 2758 A.U.C. has been inaugurated:
we've got censors censoring, consuls consul-ing, praetors praetor-ing,
aediles ... lounging about eating peeled grapes and tossing the
remnants onto the blood-soaked sand of the ampitheatre (just kidding,
but "aedile-ing" sounds too close to "idling", and they certainly
haven't been doing that), yet none have been given the blessing of the
gods in their capacities to serve the Republic.

We have had complaints that the Forum is crowded with yahoos drowning
out all pleasant conversation with politics and legal babble, yet the
authoritative voices of one of the fundamental pillars of the Republic
are... silent.

Maybe I shouldn't care; after all, I'm not a practitioner. My
immortal soul is not imperiled if the gods are not given what the
ancients believed was their due.

But I *am* a citizen, and if the public orthopractic rites of the
religio are a necessity for the welfare of the State itself, then the
public inaction of our religious authorities is cause for alarm.

"...For I consider it the part of wisdom to preserve the institutions
of our forefathers by retaining their sacred rites and ceremonies.
Furthermore, the celestial order and the beauty of the universe compel
me to confess that there is some excellent and eternal Being, who
deserves the respect and homage of men..." - Cicero, De Divinatione
lxii

Vale et valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37750 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
G. Equitius Cato Q. Fabio Maximo S.P.D.

Salve, Maximus.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 9/15/2005 6:39:03 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> Aulus.Ambrosius.Celetrus@a... writes:
>
> Has he deigned to respond to your legitimate question?
>
> I must have missed the legitimate question...


CATO: I asked:

"Maximus, it's a positive sign that the quirites are once more
clamoring for news from their religious authorities, is it not? Should
not the pontiffs et al. respond?"

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37751 From: t_octavius_salvius Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
> Metellus Postumianus, The pontiffs have taken upon themselves all
> religious authority (contrary to historic practice) yet they do not
> exercize that authority in public save for a few scattered instances.

I've been trying to follow this argument, but I'm getting a bit stuck
on the background. So, if I may ask;

What exactly was the historic practice of the pontiffs and how does it
differ from what we have now?

vale

T. Octavius Salvius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37752 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
Salvete

Another way to reach the public would be to webcast the rites and have them archived. I think this is a better idea than simply describing the words and actions involved, although it is quite a bit more expensive. When I was quaestor to Aedile Iulius Scaurus, we tried to raise money for the Ritual Demonstration Audiovisual Project of the Collegium Pontificum (it took some digging through the archives to find, see message 20978). This project, I believe, fizzled because very few people participated in the fundraising.



Looking back through those archives, I was reminded of the Centum Group and how over 1000 dollars was raised in less than a week. When people are motivated, surprising things can happen.



Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa


gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
G. Equitius Cato A. Ambrosio Celetro quiritibusque S.P.D.

<Aulus.Ambrosius.Celetrus@a...> wrote:

> Me, acerbic? As in bitter or harsh? Don't answer that :-)

CATO: MMPHMPHMMMPH

Well, Celetrus, I agree with you in the essentials; it's how to bring
about a sea-change of direction with the College of Pontiffs that is
the meat of this issue, and frankly I think that taking a somewhat
milder tone might produce results more rapidly.

The College of Pontiffs exists solely to offer the rites of the
religio for the benefit of the Republic.

As a virtual community, the only way for the broadest audience within
the Republic to be reached is via this Forum.

Therefore, in order to offer the rites of the religio for the Republic
in a way that the public can "experience" and/or learn from them it is
necessary to post them in this Forum.

It seems pretty simple. But it can be said in a nice way, with smiles
and encouragement and hearty claps on the back, instead of a
pointy-sticks-in-the-eyeballs kind of way. I'd simply advocate taking
the former course over the latter.

Or we could play good vigiles/bad vigiles.

Vale bene,

Cato





---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37753 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-09-15
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
As Ive stated earlier, we cant even get folks to pay
taxes.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<canadaoccidentalis@...> wrote:
> Salvete
>
> Another way to reach the public would be to webcast
the rites and have them archived. I think this is a
better idea than simply describing the words and
actions involved, although it is quite a bit more
expensive. When I was quaestor to Aedile Iulius
Scaurus, we tried to raise money for the Ritual
Demonstration Audiovisual Project of the Collegium
Pontificum (it took some digging through the archives
to find, see message 20978). This project, I believe,
fizzled because very few people participated in the
fundraising.
>
>
>
> Looking back through those archives, I was reminded
of the Centum Group and how over 1000 dollars was
raised in less than a week. When people are
motivated, surprising things can happen.
>
>
>
> Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
>
>
> gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato A. Ambrosio Celetro quiritibusque
S.P.D.
>
> <Aulus.Ambrosius.Celetrus@a...> wrote:
>
> > Me, acerbic? As in bitter or harsh? Don't answer
that :-)
>
> CATO: MMPHMPHMMMPH
>
> Well, Celetrus, I agree with you in the essentials;
it's how to bring
> about a sea-change of direction with the College of
Pontiffs that is
> the meat of this issue, and frankly I think that
taking a somewhat
> milder tone might produce results more rapidly.
>
> The College of Pontiffs exists solely to offer the
rites of the
> religio for the benefit of the Republic.
>
> As a virtual community, the only way for the
broadest audience within
> the Republic to be reached is via this Forum.
>
> Therefore, in order to offer the rites of the
religio for the Republic
> in a way that the public can "experience" and/or
learn from them it is
> necessary to post them in this Forum.
>
> It seems pretty simple. But it can be said in a
nice way, with smiles
> and encouragement and hearty claps on the back,
instead of a
> pointy-sticks-in-the-eyeballs kind of way. I'd
simply advocate taking
> the former course over the latter.
>
> Or we could play good vigiles/bad vigiles.
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37754 From: Maior Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
M. Hortensia Maior omnibus spd;
Salvete; well I think I can help explain. When in Marcus
Hortaius' Religio course I elected to write a sellisternia ritual for
Magna Mater, it took a ton of man-hours at the university library to
do the research, then organize it, then re-create the format (with a
ton of help from Marcus Horatius) prototype so it can be used for all
the gods. And naturally you want it in Latin too, plus; you have to be
a good writer.

So less complaining, more offers to write is the answer. It's hard
work and not to everyone's ability. The Religio has come a long way,
it needs time, support, and everyone to do what she or he is capable
of.
optime valete
Marca Hortensia Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37755 From: Lucius Servilius Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Questions
Salvete Omnibus,

I am a new member to Nova Roma I have been spending most of last week
going over all the contents on the Nova Roma home page. There are alot
of items that when you select them they pop up Site does not exist.
Espiccaly in the Rites & Rituals sections like Basic principles of
Roman Religon, Establishing a sacred place, Simple daily home rites &
prayers. I do not know if these are important to a new Nova Roman but
I would think so. The only other problem I have seen is that when I
select the links that take you away from Nova Roma as in the History
section there is so many pop-ups. And nedless to say this is very
anoying just as I get interested in reading about Roman history an add
for phone service pops up.

Valete,

Lucius Servilius Primus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37756 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: a.d. XVI Kal. Oct.
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem XVI Kalendas Octobris; haec dies comitialis est.

"Diligentia maximum etiam mediocris ingeni subsidium." (Diligence is a
very great help even to a mediocre intelligence) - Seneca

"Tullius was now first centurion for the seventh time and there was
not in the whole army amongst the infantry officers a more
distinguished soldier. He led the procession to the tribunal, and
Sulpicius was not more surprised at seeing the gathering than at
seeing Tullius at the head of it. He began: "Do not be surprised,
Dictator, at my being here. The whole army is under the impression
that it has been condemned by you for cowardice and to mark its
disgrace has been deprived of its arms. It has asked me to plead its
cause before you. Even if we could be charged with deserting our ranks
and turning our backs to the enemy, or with the disgraceful loss of
our standards, even then I should think it only fair for you to allow
us to amend our fault by courage and to wipe out the memory of our
disgraceful conduct by winning fresh glory. Even the legions which
were routed at the Alia marched out afterwards from Veii and recovered
the City which they had lost through panic. For us, thanks to the
goodness of the gods and the happy fortune which attends on you and on
Rome, our fortunes and our honour remain unimpaired. And yet I hardly
dare mention the word 'honour' whilst the enemy ventures to mock us
with every kind of insult, as if we were hiding ourselves like women
behind our rampart, and - what grieves us much more - even you our
commander have made up your mind that your army is without courage,
without weapons, without hands to use them, and before you have put us
to the proof have so despaired of us that you look upon yourself as
the commander of cripples and weaklings. What other reason can we
believe there to be, why you, a veteran commander, a most gallant
soldier, should be as they say sitting with your arms folded? However
the case may be, it is more true to say that you appear to doubt our
courage than that we doubt yours. But if this is not your doing, but a
piece of State policy, if it is some concerted scheme of the
patricians and not war with the Gauls that is keeping us in banishment
from the City and from our household gods, then I ask you to regard
what I am now going to say as addressed not by soldiers to their
commander but to the patricians by the plebs, who say that as you have
your projects so they will have theirs. Who could possibly be angry
with us for regarding ourselves as your soldiers, not your slaves,
sent to war not into banishment, ready, if any one gives the signal
and leads us into battle, to fight as becomes men and Romans, equally
ready, if there is no need for arms, to live a life of peace and
quietness in Rome rather than in camp? This is what we would say to
the patricians. But you are our commander, and we your soldiers
implore you to give us a chance of fighting. We are eager to win a
victory, but to win it under your leadership; it is on you that we
want to bestow the laurels of glory, it is with you that we desire to
enter the City in triumphal procession, it is behind your chariot that
we would go with joyous thanksgivings up to the temple of Jupiter
Optimus Maximus." This speech of Tullius' was followed by earnest
requests from the whole army that he would give the signal and order
them to arm." - Livy, History of Rome 7.13


"Duwa di Neb Ra Neb Hah!
Duwa di Neb Ra Neb Nahah!"
(Adoration be given to the Lord Ra,
The Lord of Eternity!) - First Pyramid Text (5th Dynasty, Old Kingdom)

"When I descended upon the Earth My Name was Ra-Khopra,
Greatest-Of-Manifestations. With Myself Alone were multitudes of
Forms, and I Alone came unto the Earth as Khopra, with wings of an
insect that did carry me upon Shu My Own Breath, the wind! When I did
appear as Re-Khopra at the dawn of all things the children of My Tears
(humankind) did rejoice within their hearts! They knew full well that
it was I, the One, the One of Ones, the Father and Mother of All
Creation, God-the-Almighty and One, the Creator of Heaven and Earth!
At the beginning I did appear to humankind as Khopra, and did take
unto the Air as the Lord of Heaven. I did bring forth the Benben, from
which I had brought forth the Cosmos, and set it upon the Earth, and I
called that Place Auwnuw, The Gift. From Auwnuw did I go forth in My
multitudes of Forms, and I went forth that all peoples and tribes of
Tamera [the "Land Beloved by Ra", the "Most Beloved Land", Khemet,
Egypt] might know that I was God-the-Creator, He Who Was Brought Forth
By Himself, He Who was the One, and the One of Ones, He Who was Nutjer
and Nutjeru!" - Ra's "Teaching to His People", Djosar Ma Naha Nata

In ancient Egypt, today was held in honor of the great god Ra, or Re.
Re is the most important of the Egyptian gods, the personification of
the (midday) sun. According to the Heliopolitan cosmology he created
himself from a mound that arose from the primeval waters of Nun or out
of a primordial lotus flower. He then created Shu (air) and Tefnut
(moisture), who in turn engendered the earth-god Geb and the
sky-goddess Nut. Re was said to have created humankind from his own
tears and the gods Hu and Sia from blood drawn from his own penis.

The sun itself was taken to be either his body or his eye (the 'Eye of
Re'). The center of his cult was from the very beginning in
Heliopolis, where he was also venerated in the forms of Atum (the
setting sun) and Khepri (the rising sun) and, in connection to the
morning sun, as Re-Harachte. As Re-Atum he is the creator who gives
light and warmth and thus growth. Re was often combined with other
deities to enhance the prestige of the latter, as in Re-Atum or
Amun-Re. It was said that Re traveled each day in his solar barque
through the sky, starting in the morning. At night, Re journeyed
through the underworld in another barque. And each night, the monster
Apep would try to prevent the sun-god from emerging again: the eternal
battle between light and darkness. The gods Seth and Mehen accompanied
him and were often depicted defending Re's barque. Others believed
that Re could be found at night in the underworld, consoling and
giving support to the dead. Re is also the god of the pharaohs and
since the fourth dynasty the Egyptian kings styled themselves 'sons of
Re'. After death, the monarch was said to ascend into the sky to join
the entourage of Re.

In Heliopolis the Benu or Phoenix (sacred heron) and the oracular
Mnevis (bull) were venerated as manifestations of the sun-god. Here
the kings also built temples for Re, which were important institutions
in the field of ideology. Re was usually portrayed as a man with the
head of a falcon, crowned with the sun disc encircled by the uraeus.

Ra's position in the pantheon is unusual. He is the only god, apart
from Osiris, who is definitely said to be not on the earth. Ra, it is
said, is an aging god, still powerful, but too old to deal with his
children any longer, so he has gone exclusively to the sky to watch
over the world. Horus rules over the earth and the gods in his stead,
demonstrating the divine right of kingship.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy (http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/Livy/), Re ("Re." Encyclopedia
Mythica. 2005. Encyclopedia Mythica Online.
16 Sep. 2005 <http://www.pantheon.org/articles/r/re.html>.) and
(http://www.thelivingnuhati.org/Nutjeru_6.php) and
(http://www.crystalinks.com/ra.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37757 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
G. Equitius Cato M. Hortensiae Maori quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Marca Hortensia, I have the greatest respect for the work being done
by any pontiffs regarding the recreation of rites etc., but that
really has nothing to do with the question at hand. There exist
already volumes of prayers and rituals that could be presented
publicly in accordance with the calendrical celebrations of the gods.
It is *not* merely a question of "more offers to write", it's a
question regarding the fulfillment of duties required by a (religious)
magistrate of the Republic.

If the pontiffs are not capable, if they do not have the "ability",
they should resign their pontificate; according to the guidelines set
down by the College itself in their application, aspirants to a
pontificate should have already shown their working knowledge of the
rites of the god or goddess they are interested in offering to stand
before on behalf of the People.

The pontiffs are required to offer the gods their due. What would
happen if the Consular Quaestors simply decided not to collect and
report the taxes of the citizens?

Vale et valete bene,

Cato


> So less complaining, more offers to write is the answer. It's hard
> work and not to everyone's ability. The Religio has come a long way,
> it needs time, support, and everyone to do what she or he is capable
> of.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37758 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: Questions
Salve Luci Servili,

Lucius Servilius wrote:

> I am a new member to Nova Roma I have been spending most of last week
> going over all the contents on the Nova Roma home page. There are alot
> of items that when you select them they pop up Site does not exist.

Unfortunately we are without a webmaster right now. When we have one
(perhaps later this month) we hope that some of these problems can be fixed.

Pop-ups at external sites are always annoying. I recommend getting a
browser with a pop-up blocker like firefox or netscape or the newest
explorer.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37759 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: Lex de provocatione vote results
Salve, A. Apollonius Cordus amice; salvete, omnes.

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:25:34PM +0100, A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
> A. Apollonius P. Memmio diribitoribus custodibus
> omnibus sal.
>
> Still catching up!
>
> I can't help noticing the long delay between the
> closing of the polls in this vote and the delivery of
> the results. By my reckoning it was a gap of 17 days.
> The lex Fabia requires the results to be delivered to
> the presiding magistrate within two days (48 hours) of
> the close of polls, and requires the presiding
> magistrate to announce the results within one day (24
> hours) thereafter.
>
> I know last year when I was rogator (as it then was)
> we sometimes exceeded the deadlines by an hour or two,
> and on one occasion we were even a couple of days late
> when there was a very serious case of electoral fraud
> which had to be investigated and resolved before the
> results could be verified. But exceeding the deadline
> by two weeks is really something.
>
> I don't want to take any scalps for this -

Indeed, the process is likely to be rather difficult - I, for one, am
wearing my hair quite short these days - as well as pointless, since
neither your countrymen nor the French are paying anything for them any
more. Alas for days of old... :)

> it's a very
> hard job, and this vote came at a very inconvenient
> time, at the height of the holiday season. But this is
> a very dramatic falling-short, and clearly some
> lessons need to be learned from it. This is especially
> true since this is the first year of a new arrangement
> of vote-counting magistrates, with the diribitores now
> being supervised by the custodes. I'm sure I wasn't
> the only one who suspected that these new arrangements
> might require a slight extension of the current legal
> deadlines for delivering results.
>
> If this was caused by institutional flaws in the new
> arrangements, we need to know about it so that the
> necessary changes can be made. If it was simply a
> one-off breakdown of procedures, it needs to be
> explained so that future diribitores, custodes, and
> presiding magistrates can take steps to avoid similar
> problems.
>
> In short, please don't think that I'm seeking to have
> anyone dragged over the coals; but I would ask the
> diribitores, the custodes, and the presiding
> magistrate to get together and give us just a brief
> report on what went wrong and what steps need to be
> taken to ensure it doesn't happen again.

Since no one else seems to have responded to your query, I'll take a few
minutes to cover it. It was indeed a "one-off" breakdown in procedures,
and I can reconstruct the sequence here (all times are local, with GMT
corrections shown.)

14 Aug 2005 23:59:59 +0100 Voting ends
15 Aug 2005 18:51:13 -0400 Q. Caecilius Metellus submits his results
16 Aug 2005 11:55:19 -0400 I submit my results; we begin working to
reconcile the differences
18 Aug 2005 22:59:51 -0400 We agree on a final result; I post our
tally to the list used by us and the
Iudices (at this point, the Diribitors
contribution to the process is normally
ended.)
29 Aug 2005 23:49:03 -0400 Q. Caecilius Metellus questions why the
vote has not yet been published by the
Iudices; I contact Censor Marinus for
advice and am told to release them
myself since the Iudices seem to be
absent or otherwise unavailable.
30 Aug 2005 11:34:49 -0400 I email P. Memmius Albucius the results;
shortly afterwards, the Iudices respond
and the process rolls on to its
conclusion.

As it turned out, the Iudices had somehow missed the posting of the
final tally - perhaps through spam-filtering or macro-world concerns.
This is certainly understandable, but it would be nice if we could fill
in this particular gap for the future; I've suggested to the list that
we all check in whenever voting is going on, just so that everyone is
apprised of the availability (or not) of the people who are supposed to
be involved. I've seen only thundering silence in response to this
suggestion, which - as I see it - leaves the process exactly as
vulnerable to a recurrence of it as it was originally.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Qui statuit aliquid parte inaudita altera, aequum licet statuerit.
One who passes sentence on something without having heard the other part isn't
just, even if the sentence is just.
-- Seneca Philosophus, Medea. Cf. "audietur et altera pars."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37760 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: The Duties of the Pontificate
CN·SALVIVS·ASTVR·QVIRITIBVS·S·P·D

S·V·B·E·E·V

I have read of late a few messages concerning the activity (or better
the lack thereof) among the official priesthoods of Nova Roma.

First of all, I have to say that there is one thing that can not be
denied: we, the priests of Nova Roma, are not doing enough.

There is another thing that can not be denied: everyone would be
happier if the priests of Nova Roma were doing more things. And that
includes the priests of Nova Roma.

Now, let's consider how we can pass from one situation into the other.

Some people seem to think that pointing at the current pontifices (I
wonder if they simply are forgetting about those priests that are not
pontifices) and calling for their metaphorical blood is going to solve
the problem. Others seem to think that a more constructive approach
might work better. I am afraid that things are not that simple at all.

The first problem is that no one is completely sure of what the
priests of Nova Roma should be doing. Not even the priests of Nova
Roma themselves. For example, some people have been claiming that the
priests of Nova Roma should write down "virtual rituals" on the main
list in the precise calendrical dates when each ritual is due.
Although I would have nothing against such a practice, because it
would have some value as a tool to instruct the citizenship on the
Religio Romana, I don't think that a Roman priest's obligations can be
fulfilled in that way. The rituals must be *performed* physically in
order to have any validity. An electronic message can not substitute
them.

Does that mean that, in order to fulfill their duties, the priests of
Nova Roma should be physically performing all those rituals on each
calendrical date? Well, if I could have it my way, that's exactly what
would happen.

I am sure that everyone is beginning to see that this is not an easy
task, even without delving into the details of the rituals themselves
(please, let's *not* delve into those details right now). If we ever
manage to do it, it will involve a lot of effort from many different
people, many of whom literally live oceans apart. And a continued
effort, if we are to follow the cycle of rituals year after year.

But right now there is no piece of paper that says that I, as pontifex
of Nova Roma, should be doing anything on any given date. Which makes
it difficult for me to know what I am supposed to do, and for you to
know what you can demand from me.

So I would say that, in order for anyone to be able to demand the
priests of Nova Roma to perform their duties, those duties must be
spelled out. But... who should spell out those duties? *That* will be
quite a discussion in itself.

The second problem will appear once the duties of each priest (and
magistrate, for Roman magistrates have religious duties as well) have
been clearly spelled out. This problem will be the traditional
Novoroman "I'm not getting paid for this" problem: that is, limited
time and resources. That means that, even when the religious duties of
priests (and magistrates) have defined been properly, our priests (and
magistrates) will still have jobs, families and responsabilities, just
like everyone else around here. That doesn't mean that they should not
do what they are supposed to do (when we know what they are actually
supposed to do), because doing what they are supposed to do is the
reason why the have become priests in the first place. But it does
mean that they will need all the help, support and comprehension we
all (the citizenry) can give them.

In an organization based on voluntary work, accusation and
finger-pointing is not an effective technique to get something done.

So, please, let us discuss what priests have to do. Only when we have
reached an agreement on what their specific duties are will we be able
to at least know what should be being done. And let's have more
patience with each other -- after all, like the old Novoroman proverb
goes, "I'm not getting paid for this". ;-)

BENE·VALETE·TV·TVIQVE·OMNES

CN·SALVIVS·T·F·A·NEP·OVF·ASTVR·SCRIPSIT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37761 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: T. Octavio de pontificibus antiquis (WAS: The Pontificate)
A. Apollonius T. Octavio omnibusque sal.

> I've been trying to follow this argument, but I'm
> getting a bit stuck
> on the background. So, if I may ask;
>
> What exactly was the historic practice of the
> pontiffs and how does it
> differ from what we have now?

I don't know whether I can cover the whole topic, but
I'll give as thorough an answer as I can.

The ancient pontifices had various duties. Most of
these duties aimed at the same basic idea, which was
that they should make sure that the republic did what
was necessary to uphold its end of the contract with
the gods which maintained the pax deorum. This
principally involved performing various rituals and
making sure that other rituals were performed by other
people.

There were many rituals which had to be performed by a
pontifex in person. There was no difference between
the different pontifices - any pontifex would do. Some
rituals, however, could only be performed by the
pontifex maximus. There were also many other rituals
which had to be performed by other priests or
magistrates, and often a pontifex would be required to
assist with or supervise these (for instance it was
common for a pontifex or an augur to recite the ritual
words to a magistrate, who would then repeat the
words). Rituals might be required annually on specific
days or might be required for some one-off occasion
such as the dedication of a temple.

The pontifex maximus, and possibly also the pontifices
as a college, also had a general responsibility to
make sure that all the other priests were doing their
jobs correctly and that all the magistrates were
fulfilling their religious duties.

The pontifices were also responsible for interpreting
religious law and procedure and making rulings on
uncertainties about these things. Indeed they used to
be responsible for interpreting the whole body of law,
but their monopoly in this area was broken in the
fourth and third centuries by various "leaks" of
pontifical books and archives which made legal rules
and procedures more accessible to ordinary people.
Nonetheless throughout the republic it was common for
pontifices to have a good knowledge of law.

The most common situation in which the pontifices were
called up to make such rulings and interpretations was
when the senate asked for their advice. This might
happen, for example, if a prodigy was reported and the
senate wished to ask what should be done to expiate
it, or if a magistrate wanted to do something and the
senate wished to know whether it would be permitted by
religious law. The senate was under no obligation to
consult the pontifices on such questions, and could in
stead choose to consult the augures, the haruspices,
the quindecemviri, or no one at all (though the last
was very unusual). The pontifices could also be
consulted by magistrates and private citizens.

A single pontifex could give an interpretation or
ruling, but this was not considered definitive. If
three pontifices agreed on an interpretation or
ruling, however, that was considered definitive. It's
not clear what would happen if another group of more
than three pontifices tried to overrule a ruling made
by three pontifices; as far as I'm aware it never
happened. Serious disagreements among the pontifices
must have been considerably reduced by the tradition
of never appointing as a pontifex someone who was an
enemy (inimicus) of an existing pontifex. The
pontifices rarely, if ever, all met together in a
group to vote on anything. This is in contrast to our
current practice, which treats the collegium
pontificum as a sort of committee akin to the senate.

The pontifices could not make rulings or
interpretations (responsa) of their own accord - they
had to wait to be consulted by the senate or by
someone else. In practice, however, many pontifices
were senatores as well and if a number of pontifices
felt that they should be consulted they would usually
be able to persuade the senate or a magistrate to do
so. No doubt they could also make their views known in
an informal, personal capacity. But they could not
just decide amongst themselves to get together and
issue a respondum (indeed the very word "responsum"
shows that a responsum could only be issued in
response to a query). This is in contrast to current
practice, which allows the collegium pontificum to
issue decrees (decreta - an unhistorical term) on more
or less any subject it chooses, at any time it
chooses.

Pontifical responsa were always rulings of law, not of
fact. Considering questions of fact was not within the
power of the pontifices. Thus, when Clodius attempted
to consecrate Cicero's house and Cicero wanted to
return and move back in, he consulted the pontifices
on whether the consecration was valid or not. The
pontifices' responsum was not "the person claiming to
have dedicated [the house] was not appointed by name
either by order of the people or by a decree of the
plebs and was not commanded to do so by an order of
the people or decree of the plebs, therefore that part
of the property may be restored without sacrilege". It
was "if the person claiming to have dedicated [the
house] was not appointed by name either by order of
the people or by a decree of the plebs, and if he was
not commanded to do so by an order of the people or
decree of the plebs, then it appears that that part of
the property may be restored without sacrilege". The
question of whether the "ifs" were true or false was
left to the senate to decide. Indeed the standard
opening of a pontifical responsum was "if the facts
are those that are contained in the petition..."

Similarly, if the pontifices were consulted by the
senate about how a prodigy could be expiated, their
responsum answered the question and nothing more. If,
then, they said that it could be expiated by a
sacrifice of an ox, that did not create a legal
obligation upon anyone to actually perform that
sacrifice, it just indicated that if the sacrifice
were not performed then something nasty would probably
happen. In practice, however, the senate almost
invariably advised the consules to do what the
pontifices suggested, and the consules almost
invariably did it. Nonetheless, the pontifices could
not create law or put its decisions into action under
its own power. This is in contrast to current
practice, which not only allows the collegium
pontificum to create law but gives law created by the
collegium precedence over senatus consulta and the
edicta of magistrates.

I think that's most of it covered.





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37762 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
G. Equitius Cato Gn. Salvio Asturi quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Astur, thank you for your approach to the question. It does leave me
a little but puzzled, however. In the Constitution, we are told that
the College of Pontiffs:

"To have ritual responsibilities within the Religio Romana; and
general authority over the institutions, rites, rituals, and
priesthoods of the public Religio Romana" - NR Constitution VI.B.1.b

On the pages devoted specifically to "Priests and Priesthoods", we are
told:

"The Collegium Pontificum consists of XV priests who serve the public
rites of the State religion and have general authority to determine
the structure and nature of both the public rites and the priesthoods
themselves. They act as the general oversight committee for the public
rites of the Religio Romana and appoint members of the various
Priesthoods. Some specific administrative duties of the Collegium
include: advising the Senate on religious matters, setting the dates
of religious festivals, organizing and assisting the Priesthood, and
acting as the final arbiters of Sacred Law and religious disputes."

"The Flamines hold public rites on the days sacred to their deity, and
oversee the general worship of that deity."

"The Flamen Martialis oversees the cult of Mars, the God of War,
leading public rites on the days sacred to Mars."

"The Flamen Quirinalis leads public rites on the days sacred to
Quirinus."

"The Flamen Cerealis leads public rites on the days sacred to Ceres."

"The Flamen Florialis leads public rites on the days sacred to Flora."

"The Flamen Furinalis leads public rites on the days sacred to
Furrina."

"The Flamen Pomonalis leads public rites on days sacred to Pomona
(there was no major single festival day)."

"The Flamen Volcanalis leads public rites sacred to Volcanus."

And all of these positions are currently being held by citizens. We
have seen activity by two of them, to my knowledge (the flamen
Cerealis and the flamen Martialis). Scaurus used to post the
calendar, but health reasons apparently forced him to drop it to tend
to other necessirties.

In the application for a priesthood, it is required that an applicant:

"We ask that Priesthood applicants have real time to devote toward
advancing the worship of their chosen deity both within Nova Roma and
in the outside world. This involves being available for public
correspondence concerning the worship of the God or Goddess they
serve, assisting others in their personal worship, working to
reconstruct rites, prayers and other religious liturgy related to
their deity, being available for public rites sponsored by Nova Roma,
and ideally, organizing public rites/temples on their own as well. We
feel that Priesthood is defined by active service on many levels.
Therefore we cannot provide empty "titles" for those who are unable to
put forth genuine effort."

and

"Each Priestess or Priest will be required to create a complete
written "plan" for rebuilding the worship of their deity at some
point, This will need to include not only a historical overview of
their God or Goddesses ancient worship, but also written rituals for
the deities festival days, prayers and rites for others who seek to
worship that deity, offering liturgy, etc."

There is no question about "what?" or "how?" or "who?", Astur. Those
answers are laid out as clearly and simply as anything I have yet seen
in any part of our tabularium :-)

The question is why they are not simply obeying the requirements they
themselves have created.

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37763 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
A. Ambrosius Celetrus C. Salvio Astori s.p.d.

Gnaeus Salvius Astur wrote:

> There is another thing that can not be denied: everyone would be
> happier if the priests of Nova Roma were doing more things. And that
> includes the priests of Nova Roma.

According to Pontifex Maximus, you are all hard at work reengineering
the Religio. Some of us would like to see evidence of this in the form
of rituals honoring the gods.

> Some people seem to think that pointing at the current pontifices (I
> wonder if they simply are forgetting about those priests that are not
> pontifices)

"The Collegium Pontificum consists of XV priests who serve the public
rites of the State religion and have general authority to determine the
structure and nature of both the public rites and the priesthoods
themselves."

"Some specific administrative duties of the Collegium include: advising
the Senate on religious matters, setting the dates of religious
festivals, organizing and assisting the Priesthood."

The pontiffs are ultimately responsible for the lack of religious life
in NR. You can invest plenty of time and energy on whether or not
someone is "nefas," or whether women can be in your ranks, but evidently
you now not only wish to be absolved from serving the public rites, but
also from your administrative duties.

> The first problem is that no one is completely sure of what the
> priests of Nova Roma should be doing. Not even the priests of Nova
> Roma themselves.

Then what precisely do you do to deserve your title?

> For example, some people have been claiming that the priests of Nova
> Roma should write down "virtual rituals" on the main list in the
> precise calendrical dates when each ritual is due.

(...)

> I don't think that a Roman priest's obligations can be fulfilled in
> that way.

(...)

> Does that mean that, in order to fulfill their duties, the priests of
> Nova Roma should be physically performing all those rituals on each
> calendrical date? Well, if I could have it my way, that's exactly what
>
> would happen.

Who is opposing you?

> I am sure that everyone is beginning to see that this is not an easy
> task, even without delving into the details of the rituals themselves
> (please, let's *not* delve into those details right now).

Let's cut to the chase. Pontifex Maximus wrote, "We used to publish the
fact we carrying out rituals. We also encouraged the people to join in
with us. Pontifices and the Pontifex Maximus published
ritual formulas to the main list. We were ignored. So we research more
now, and interact with the public less."

Either these rituals exist or they don't. This entire post of yours
essentially says that they don't. Is Maximus lying, then? If they do
exist, and have been posted before, then they can be now. Certainly the
flamines Cerialis and Volturnalis have done so in the past year, as has
the flamen Martialis. Modia Lupa and Moravia Aurelia have found the time
to honor Dea Diana on this forum. If these religious can, and the flamen
Pomonalis can't, then why is he still the flamen Pomonalis? If the CP is
still, after what now, seven years, confused about it's duties, why does
it exist? Why do you deserve any respect?

> But right now there is no piece of paper that says that I, as pontifex
>
> of Nova Roma, should be doing anything on any given date. Which makes
> it difficult for me to know what I am supposed to do, and for you to
> know what you can demand from me.

Again, just what have you all been doing? This IS your job, isn't it? It
IS what Maximus claims you've been doing, isn't it? If you, as yet, do
not know what you are supposed to do, then what possible business do you
or anyone else on the CP have posting about anything else on the lists?
Why is Maximus wasting his precious volunteer time posting about chariot
racing, or the new Rome mini-series, when he hasn't yet figured out what
his title job entails?

> So I would say that, in order for anyone to be able to demand the
> priests of Nova Roma to perform their duties, those duties must be
> spelled out.

Again, some (see above) would seem to have a very good idea of what
their duties are, and work to fulfill them, and share their work with
the rest of us. They certainly have my honor and respect, as I imagine
they have of all the practitioners in NR. Apparently, only pontifices
are confused about their duties.

> But... who should spell out those duties? *That* will be
> quite a discussion in itself.

(...)

> So, please, let us discuss what priests have to do.

Again, and again, and again, what DO you DO in the Collegium Pontificum.

> And let's have more
> patience with each other

The majority of your post has been nothing but evasion and obfuscation,
and amounts to nothing more than "let's talk." The title of this post
suggests that there are such things as "The Duties of the Pontificate,"
and ends with "Only when we have reached an agreement on what their
specific duties are will we be able to at least know what should be
being done."

Seven years, and by your own words you have no idea what the specific
duties of the Nova Roma priesthoods are, yet you have the nerve to
advocate patience. Moravius Vado wrote a ritual for Kalendis Martiis
over five years ago. Cassius praised it, Graecus praised it, it's a
wonderful ritual lost, unused, in the archives. Answer me just one
question, Salvi, why is this so?

vale


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37764 From: Tribune Albucius Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: Lex de provocatione vote results
P. Memmius Albucius A. Apollonio Cordo Scaevolae Tb Fuscoque et
omnibus s.d.

S.V.G.E.R.

Even the results have been published 2 weeks ago, you are right in
pointing the problem that occurred in the communication of the vote
results.

I did not have the intention, when waiting for the results from mid-
august to the end of this month -though on holidays but connected in
Italia ! - and still have not, to ask for "scalps", to use your
expression.

I would just remember the 4th paragraph of my publication edict
(message ML n° 37486 sept 1, 2005 10:29) which said : "In view of
the messages of the 30th August 2005, by Custos Decius Iunius
Palladius Invictus and Diribitor Caius Minucius Scaevola
communicating and certifying the results of the vote on the
proposed draft law, (..)".

All answers you are asking for are contained in these lines (and
between/through them).

In addition, the message (ML, today sep. 16, 4:10 pm)from Dir. Caius
Minucius Scaevola give you, and all of us, additional information
about what seemed to be wrong in the counting process.

What must make us progress is to ask us :

1/ how to do to :
- guarantee that our public magistracies and offices to work
effectively with no vacancy from Jan 1st to Dec 31 ;
- give us alternative solutions in order to answer a question in
spite of the default of a magistrate (here, apparently, the Iudices).

2/ if we need to create types of offices if they do not work. Do we
need rogatores + diribitores + iudices ? These offices may suit to
an empire with million of citizens, but to our current Res publica ?

Vale Corde, valete Scaevola Fusceque, et omnes.



P. Memmius Albucius
Tribunus Plebis





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@y...> wrote:
> A. Apollonius P. Memmio diribitoribus custodibus
> omnibus sal.
>
> Still catching up!
>
> I can't help noticing the long delay between the
> closing of the polls in this vote and the delivery of
> the results. By my reckoning it was a gap of 17 days.
> The lex Fabia requires the results to be delivered to
> the presiding magistrate within two days (48 hours) of
> the close of polls, and requires the presiding
> magistrate to announce the results within one day (24
> hours) thereafter.
>
> I know last year when I was rogator (as it then was)
> we sometimes exceeded the deadlines by an hour or two,
> and on one occasion we were even a couple of days late
> when there was a very serious case of electoral fraud
> which had to be investigated and resolved before the
> results could be verified. But exceeding the deadline
> by two weeks is really something.
>
> I don't want to take any scalps for this - it's a very
> hard job, and this vote came at a very inconvenient
> time, at the height of the holiday season. But this is
> a very dramatic falling-short, and clearly some
> lessons need to be learned from it. This is especially
> true since this is the first year of a new arrangement
> of vote-counting magistrates, with the diribitores now
> being supervised by the custodes. I'm sure I wasn't
> the only one who suspected that these new arrangements
> might require a slight extension of the current legal
> deadlines for delivering results.
>
> If this was caused by institutional flaws in the new
> arrangements, we need to know about it so that the
> necessary changes can be made. If it was simply a
> one-off breakdown of procedures, it needs to be
> explained so that future diribitores, custodes, and
> presiding magistrates can take steps to avoid similar
> problems.
>
> In short, please don't think that I'm seeking to have
> anyone dragged over the coals; but I would ask the
> diribitores, the custodes, and the presiding
> magistrate to get together and give us just a brief
> report on what went wrong and what steps need to be
> taken to ensure it doesn't happen again.
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all
new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37765 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: Lex de provocatione vote results
A. Apollonius C. Minucio P. Memmio omnibus sal.

Thank you both for your explanations. It sounds like
we need to hear from the custodes to fill in the
crucial details.

As you say, P. Memmi, the crucial thing to do now is
to ask how this can be avoided in future. In
particular we need to consider whether this was a
one-off combination of circumstances or whether it is
a structural problem with our new arrangement of
diribitores and custodes. The evidence so far suggests
the latter, but the people in the best position to
diagnose the problem are the people involved in the
process, particularly the diribitores and the
custodes. I hope they will put their heads together
and consider what, if anything, is needed to stop this
happening again; and if they conclude that new
legislation is needed, I hope they will ask for it.



___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37766 From: Maior Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
M. Hortensia Aulo Ambrosio salutem dicit;
Salve; Celetre you wish a return of the good "On-Line
Religion". If you read John Scheid you would know that the
principal cult is the home. You are the priest of your family cult.

Plenty of us have set up our lararia and worship the gods. I wished
all and sundry a festive Saturnalia in the depths of Ireland. I've
conduced ceremonies to Circe and Summanus right out on my suburban
front lawn in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. I have an 80 year old
father, neighbors and have them still. I also put on my toga and met
fellow Nova Romans in New York City where in public we made a
libation to Apollo.

Members of the Religio are not ashamed and are out there in the
public doing ritual. The PM Cassius and pontifices Gaius Buteo and
Metellus are.

So stop complaining, go out attend to your family gods, arrange a
meeting of fellow members of the Religio and offer your help to the
CP.

The more we work together, the more the Religio becomes real, the
more the gods are worshipped!
vale
Marca Hortensia Maior

> Beyond making my neighbors question my sanity, and some family
members
> fear for my immortal soul? I have work, and ailing 85 yeal-old
father, a
> dying brother-in-law and a frantic sister to attend to, and those
> obligations, and my private rites are enough. Which is why it is
galling
> that those who claim the public titles do not serve the rites. My
> father expects his priest to offer the Divine Liturgy every
Sunday. I
> expect the same from those who claim a vocation in NR.
>
> > What are you doing in NR?
>
> Nothing, and until there actually IS a public face to the Religio
in NR,
> officiated by those who have arrogated their titles to themselves,
while
> shirking their duties, it will stay that way.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37767 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
A. Apollonius A. Ambrosio sal.

My, how nicely we alliterate!

A. Ambrosi, I urge you to take care not to alienate
precisely the people who are working to achieve the
improvements you are calling for. Notice which
pontifices have come to the forum to engage in serious
discussion of your criticisms and which pontifices are
keeping their heads safely behind the parapet.

Q. Metellus and Cn. Salvius could very easily have
pursued what you call the standard pontifical strategy
for dealing with criticism - ignore it. They haven't.
They have made an effort to seriously discuss your
points. And what reward have you given them for it?
You've been unceasingly aggressive toward them and
failed to take on board a single word they've said. Is
it any wonder if the majority of pontifices play it
safe and simply ignore your comments?

The two pontifices you have so lavishly savaged also
happen to be the two newest members of the collegium
and thus the two who are *least* responsible for the
problems you are complaining about. Metellus has been
in the job for less than a month, and if you think
that's long enough to research and write a ritual then
you clearly have rather lower standards of academic
rigour than we are entitled to expect from our
pontifices. Astur has been a pontifex for less than a
year, and if you want to know what he has been doing
you may be able to find a clue in his sensible and
carefully reasoned message which you so contemptuously
dismiss as "nothing but evasion and obfuscation": he
has been working on trying to actually *perform* these
rituals.

You seem to have entirely ignored one of his main
points, which is that a pontifex who merely writes a
ritual and posts it on the internet is no more doing
his job than a pontifex who does nothing at all. The
ritual has to be actually performed in person. That
requires a considerable amount of paraphernalia, and
that paraphernalia depends on which ritual you're
talking about. At least one needs an altar, and if you
had bothered to ask you might have found out that this
is one of the things Astur and his fellow Hispani have
been working hard to research, design, and make. This
stuff is not cheap and it is not easy.

You appear to consider that any ritual would be better
than none, but of course that's nonsense. Each
occasion requires a very specific ritual, and each one
is different. You quite correctly point out that "the
flamines Cerialis and Volturnalis have [written and
posted rituals] in the past year, as has the flamen
Martialis. Modia Lupa and Moravia Aurelia have found
the time to honor Dea Diana on this forum". Very true.
But with this statement you suggest that performing
rituals should be extremely easy for the pontifices
because they already have these texts lying around,
ready for use. This is, of course, sheer nonsense: a
ritual performed by the flamen Cerealis on the
occasion of the Cerealia is no earthly use to a
pontifex who needs to celebrate the ludi Romani, nor
is a sacerdos' ritual in honour of Diana suitable for
recycling by a pontifex in honour of Saturnus. Each
different ritual must be researched individually, and
the fact that some of them are lying around doesn't
make it any easier to come up with the others, even if
the ones which are already lying around are up to
standard, which they may well not be.

You also make light work, or think you do, of Astur's
point that the duties of the pontifices are not set
out clearly anywhere. You reply that "some (see above)
would seem to have a very good idea of what their
duties are". You refer to the flamen Cerealis, the
flamen Martialis, the sacerdos Dianae, and so on.
Well, yes, of course they have a very good idea of
their duties, because the flamen Cerealis is
responsible specifically for festivals of Ceres, the
flamen Martialis for those of Mars, the sacerdos
Dianae for those of Diana. It doesn't take much
research to work out what your duties are when they're
described in your job title. But you have ignored what
Astur actually wrote: "right now there is no piece of
paper that says that I, as pontifex
of Nova Roma, should be doing anything on any given
date". This is, of course, absolutely true. Yes, we
all know that the pontifices are responsible for
performing rituals; Cato has produced plenty of texts
saying so. But which rituals are they responsible for
performing? Just any old rituals which come into their
head? No, there are specific rituals which require
pontifices and others which it would be inappropriate
for them to perform. So it's all very well to demand
that they do rituals, but it fails to take into
account that it takes a pontifex a considerable amount
of research even to find out which rituals he is
supposed to do, let alone how to do them.

Incidentally, you have hit upon a rhetorical device
which you clearly regard as extremely clever: that of
using Q. Maximus' comments to "disprove", as it were,
anything that any other pontifex says. This is not, I
must tell you, a very persuasive trick, since most of
us in this forum know perfectly well that Maximus
frequently contradicts not only other people but also
himself, common sense, and the principles of English
syntax. His recollection of the history of Nova Roma
is particularly erratic, and his tendency to speak for
others is particularly egregious. So when he says that
"we used to publish the fact we carrying out rituals",
this cannot be taken as fact without external
corroboration; and when he says "we were ignored, so
we research more now, and interact with the public
less", this cannot be taken as a reflection of the
views or motives of anyone apart from himself.

There are serious problems with the way the collegium
pontificum operates. The two pontifices whom you have
subjected to your vitriol have admitted this and have
tried to engage you in a constructive conversation
about what can be done about it. You seem to have a
simplistic idea that all that needs to be done is for
the pontifices to knuckle down and do it, and when
pontifices - who are, let's face it, far better
informed about what goes on in the collegium than you
are - try to tell you that the problem is more complex
than that, you dismiss their comments and repeat the
same thing again and again. No doubt you assume,
without troubling to inquire into the character and
rectitude of these individuals, that they are lying
through their teeth to protect themselves from your
noble crusade. Well, perhaps you will listen to me
when, as a non-pontifex and a frequent critic of the
collegium, I try to explain to you why the situation
is more complex than you care to contemplate.

For one thing, as I've mentioned, the wherewithall
needed to actually perform a ritual is difficult to
find and can be expensive, and since the pontifices
have no official budget they must pay for these things
from their own purses. For another, as I've also said,
it requires research to find out which rituals were
performed by pontifices and which were not. Thirdly,
and again I repeat myself, it takes further research
to find out what is actually involved in a given
ritual and to fill in the gaps in the surviving
formulae. But let me go on to some things which have
not been mentioned.

There are eight pontifices plus a pontifex maximus,
and any one of them may perform a pontifical ritual.
So, once it is known that a day is coming up which
requires a ritual to be performed by a pontifex, how
is it to be determined which pontifex will research
and perform it? Here we run up against the problem of
decision-making within the collegium, for, as we
frequently hear pontifices themselves complain in this
very forum, the collegium is a cumbersome machine and
its decision-making is not a speedy process. This is
partly its own fault, but it is also a result of the
fact that our constitution forces the collegium to
behave like a committee where historically it rarely,
if ever, operated in that way. And we may add to this
the fact that the decision must be made a very long
time in advance, in order to ensure that the pontifex
to whom the task falls may have time to research and
write the ritual in time to perform it on the right
day - for a ritual performed on the wrong day is
little better than a ritual not performed at all.

There can be no doubt that seven years is, as you say,
long enough to have done much more work than has in
fact been done. The pontifices who have been in office
for seven years do have some explaining to do. But who
are you attacking? You say to Astur that he has had
seven years, but in fact he has had little more than
seven months, while Metellus has had little more than
seven days - yet when they reply to you and say "yes,
we are trying", you demand to know why it's taking
them so long! These are precisely the men in whom we
may, and should, put our trust to revive and
reinvigorate the collegium. We should encourage and
exhort them, but you seem to be more interested in
beating them about the ears. This is precisely the way
to get them to retreat into the safety of silence and
inactivity.

As for the rest of us, let me tell you that I began
with considerable sympathy for your criticisms, and I
still think many of them valid, but as I see you
saying the same thing again and again without paying
any attention at all to what anyone says I become
increasingly antipathetic to your argument merely
because it is your mouth it is coming out of. You give
the strong impression that you are not remotely
interested in actually achieving what you are asking
for if it involves engaging in serious, constructive
discussion with other human beings, and that the only
outcome you are interested in is unequivocal
surrender. In short, you have a very worthy and
legitimate cause, and your method of pursuing it is
doing it nothing but harm by alienating potential
sympathisers both within and without the pontificate.
I urge you to reconsider your approach: assassinating
Caesar only gets you Augustus.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37768 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
SALVE ET SALVETE !

I'm agree with you Hortensia Maior. The romans didn't think at the
priests like the specially trained religious authorities. A priest
was a citizen.The citizen, like a head of a family (paterfamilias)
it was the family priest. He ensured that family members maintained
the sacra each family celebrated and worshipped the gods of each
household, as well as supervised the rituals of the family. In the
time of the priesthood they acquired the necessary knowledge their
duties required. In fact, roman priesthoods were a part of the roman
politician's public life. But they wasn't trained for the
priesthood. It's the same in our case. We learn step by step,
together.

VALE ET VALETE,
IVL SABINVS


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:

<<< If you read John Scheid you would know that the principal cult
is the home. You are the priest of your family cult. Plenty of us
have set up our lararia and worship the gods. I wished all and
sundry a festive Saturnalia in the depths of Ireland. I've conduced
ceremonies to Circe and Summanus right out on my suburban front lawn
in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. I have an 80 year old father,
neighbors and have them still. I also put on my toga and met fellow
Nova Romans in New York City where in public we made a libation to
Apollo.
The more we work together, the more the Religio becomes real, the
more the gods are worshipped!>>>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37769 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-16
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
A. Ambrosius Celetrus A Apollonio Cordo sal.


> A. Apollonius A. Ambrosio sal.
>
> My, how nicely we alliterate!

And my, how many words we use to say nothing new, and to state facts
every practioner knows about the nature of rituals.

> Q. Metellus and Cn. Salvius could very easily have
> pursued what you call the standard pontifical strategy
> for dealing with criticism - ignore it. They haven't.
> They have made an effort to seriously discuss your
> points.

I'm sorry, when I'm told there are no guidelines for what priests are to
do, when there clearly are (see Cato's post to Astur), I tend to believe
I'm getting just one more pontifical run-a-round.

> You seem to have entirely ignored one of his main
> points, which is that a pontifex who merely writes a
> ritual and posts it on the internet is no more doing
> his job than a pontifex who does nothing at all.

Actually, Corde, it is you who failed to read carefully. Astur wrote:

"The first problem is that no one is completely sure of what the
priests of Nova Roma should be doing. Not even the priests of Nova
Roma themselves."

And this, as Cato has pointed out is demonstrably false. And,

"Although I would have nothing against such a practice, because it
would have some value as a tool to instruct the citizenship on the
Religio Romana, I don't think that a Roman priest's obligations can be
fulfilled in that way. The rituals must be *performed* physically in
order to have any validity. An electronic message can not substitute
them."

The gulf between saying "I don't think," and "must be performed" is a
big one, and in any case the issue here is, and has been, do these
rituals exist.

> You quite correctly point out that "the
> flamines Cerialis and Volturnalis have [written and
> posted rituals] in the past year, as has the flamen
> Martialis. Modia Lupa and Moravia Aurelia have found
> the time to honor Dea Diana on this forum". Very true.
> But with this statement you suggest that performing
> rituals should be extremely easy for the pontifices
> because they already have these texts lying around,
> ready for use.

I "suggest" no such thing, and would really be interested just how you
reasoned your way to this. The thought processes involved will be
fascinating.

> This is, of course, sheer nonsense: a
> ritual performed by the flamen Cerealis on the
> occasion of the Cerealia is no earthly use to a
> pontifex who needs to celebrate the ludi Romani,

Really? Really, is this true? You mean there's a difference between the
two?

> nor
> is a sacerdos' ritual in honour of Diana suitable for
> recycling by a pontifex in honour of Saturnus.

Diana and Saturnus are not the same?

> Each
> different ritual must be researched individually, and
> the fact that some of them are lying around doesn't
> make it any easier to come up with the others, even if
> the ones which are already lying around are up to
> standard, which they may well not be.

You do like to repeat yourself.

> You also make light work, or think you do, of Astur's
> point that the duties of the pontifices are not set
> out clearly anywhere.

Actually, they are, explicitly in the Constitution and on the "Priests
and Priesthoods" page. I do not make light of his point, because he has
none here.

> Incidentally, you have hit upon a rhetorical device
> which you clearly regard as extremely clever: that of
> using Q. Maximus' comments to "disprove", as it were,
> anything that any other pontifex says.

They are a committee, are they not? Contrasting the statements of
Maximus and Astur legitimately highlights its ineffectiveness.

> So when he says that
> "we used to publish the fact we carrying out rituals",
> this cannot be taken as fact without external
> corroboration; and when he says "we were ignored, so
> we research more now, and interact with the public
> less", this cannot be taken as a reflection of the
> views or motives of anyone apart from himself.

Again, Maximus is a pontiff, Astur is a pontiff. And you are absolutely
right, at this stage I make no difference between any pontiff, their
length of service, and certainly whether they are, or are not, friends
of Apollonius Cordus.

> You seem to have a
> simplistic idea that all that needs to be done is for
> the pontifices to knuckle down and do it, and when
> pontifices - who are, let's face it, far better
> informed about what goes on in the collegium than you
> are - try to tell you that the problem is more complex
> than that, you dismiss their comments and repeat the
> same thing again and again.

No, Corde, what I want to know, again and again, is "do the rituals
exist?" If they do, then they can be posted when due, according to the
calendar, for precisely the reasons Astur stated. If not, then the CP
should state that, after seven years of supposed work, they do not.

You want me to respect Astur and Metellus as individuals, and not lump
them together with the rest. Let them tell us the truth about the state
of the Religio's reconstruction. Right now, they are just member of the
CP trying to diffuse criticism.

Of course reconstruction is complex and time consuming. Your incredibly
tedious statement of the obvious, not withstanding, that IS NOT what
this is about. This is about whether anything has been done at all. Is
the CP trying to reconstruct the Religio, or are they all just
researching their own books. Your loyalty to your friends is admirable,
but they are your friends, not mine. They are just member of the CP to
me, and I strongly feel the CP had not been doing what it claims to have
been doing, and they most certainly not doing what the Religio pages of
the website claim they are for.

Vale


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37770 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Pontificate
A. Celetrus M Hortensiae s.d.

You asked "Now what are you doing in your part of Pennsylvania for the
Religio?"

And I replied, "Beyond making my neighbors question my sanity, and some
family
members fear for my immortal soul?"

Evidently my answer was far to subtle for you, so I shall be explicit. I
have a lararium in my home and my garden. My neighbors think I'm crazy
because of my daily rites, and some of my family fear I have damned
myself with the Religio. Perhaps this too isn't clear enough for you. So
I shall be even more explicit. My family knows that I no longer believe
in the One, True God, offer prayers to demons, and that I am therefore
damned.

This is what I do in my part of Pennsylvania. If other obligations
permitted me to do more, I would.

None of this has any bearing whatsoever on the matter at hand, because
what I do or do not do is irrelevant. I am not a priest of Nova Roma. I
am not in contempt of the Gods, because I neglect my sacerdotal
obligations. I do not collect titles simply to have them.

What Buteo and Metellus do outside of NR ir also irrelevant. If their
outside endeavors (what all is Modianus now, an Archdruid, a gnostic
bishop, grand high pubah and President of the He Man Women Haters Club?)
are interfering with their ability to discharge their duties in NR, they
should either set them aside, or step down in NR.

And Cassius. On the Nova Religio Romana list last year, a list member
criticized Cassius for not helping her as PM in a macronational custody
case. As part of his explanation as to why he did not, he stated that he
didn't what to end up on the "Jerry Springer Show." Yes, I can see that
Cassius is not ashamed.

vale


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37771 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
G. Equitius Cato A. Apollonio Cordo quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Cordus, you know that I respect your intelligence and objectivity in
pretty much every possible instance. I also trust in your integrity.
The difficulty I have in absorbing and accepting your response to
Celetrus is that I have searched the archives of this Forum, and the
Nova Roma website, over the past three years and found fully-formed
and described rituals or prayers for the following festivals, deities,
and occasions:

The Vinalia
The Equirria
The Ludi Apollinares
The Nemoralia
The Quinquatria
The Floralia
The Robigalia
The Tubilustrium
The Cerealia
The Larentalia
Thec Parentalia
The Saturnalia
The Meditrinalia

Mars Invictus
Fortuna Publica
Concordia
Iuppiter Latiarius
The New Year (Consular)
Ablutio
The Kalends of every month
The Nones of every month
The Ides of every month
Mars Silvanus
Iuppiter Dapalis
Ceres
Iuno
Ianus
Apollo
Venus
Neptune
Spes Bona

These rites, prayers, etc. were published by, among others:

Cassius Iulianus
Iulius Scaurus
Minucius Hadrinus
Cincinnatus Augur
Modia Lupa
Popillius Laenas
Bruttius Sura

and...

Salvius Astur himself.


I found these by clicking through the website and archives in the
course of 15 minutes.

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37772 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
CN·SALVIVS·ASTVR·QVIRITIBVS·S·P·D

S·V·B·E·E·V

I would like to make a few comments about the responses my latest
e-mail to these lists has got. Please, forgive me for lumping all the
responses in a single message, but I have the impression that that
will save everyone's time.

Thank you, in any case, for reading through what I have to say.

Firstly, Cn. Equitius Cato (salve, amice) wrote:

> Astur, thank you for your approach to the question. It does leave me
> a little but puzzled, however. In the Constitution, we are told that
> the College of Pontiffs:
>
> "To have ritual responsibilities within the Religio Romana; and
> general authority over the institutions, rites, rituals, and
> priesthoods of the public Religio Romana" - NR Constitution VI.B.1.b

Er... yes. "Ritual responsabilities". "General authority". Does that
really sound too precise to you?

To give you an example, it does not say whether I have to do anything
on the nonae of November.

I am not saying, in any case, that the Constitution is the place to
define those things. I am just saying that it isn't defined there.

> On the pages devoted specifically to "Priests and Priesthoods", we are
> told:
>
> "The Collegium Pontificum consists of XV priests who serve the public
> rites of the State religion and have general authority to determine
> the structure and nature of both the public rites and the priesthoods
> themselves. They act as the general oversight committee for the public
> rites of the Religio Romana and appoint members of the various
> Priesthoods. Some specific administrative duties of the Collegium
> include: advising the Senate on religious matters, setting the dates
> of religious festivals, organizing and assisting the Priesthood, and
> acting as the final arbiters of Sacred Law and religious disputes."

You see? It doesn't say whether I have to do anything on the nonae of November!

Actually, I think that the Collegium Pontificum has been more or less
active on these fronts, which do not involve, by the way, performing
any ritual.

[Information about flamines snipped]

> And all of these positions are currently being held by citizens. We
> have seen activity by two of them, to my knowledge (the flamen
> Cerealis and the flamen Martialis). Scaurus used to post the
> calendar, but health reasons apparently forced him to drop it to tend
> to other necessirties.

Scaurus posted each day about the Roman calendar, but it didn't really
have much to do with his duties as a pontifex, which you have quoted
above.

Mind you; I am *not* saying that the pontifices should do nothing that
does not fall within the lax definition you have just quoted. I am
saying that, right now, this definition of duties is far too
imprecise. I want the pontifices, the flamines, the sacerdotes *and*
the magistrati of Nova Roma (because, let's not forget it, magistrates
have religious duties too) to fulfill their duties according to Roman
tradition as best as possible.

> In the application for a priesthood, it is required that an applicant:
>
> "We ask that Priesthood applicants have real time to devote toward
> advancing the worship of their chosen deity both within Nova Roma and
> in the outside world. This involves being available for public
> correspondence concerning the worship of the God or Goddess they
> serve, assisting others in their personal worship, working to
> reconstruct rites, prayers and other religious liturgy related to
> their deity, being available for public rites sponsored by Nova Roma,
> and ideally, organizing public rites/temples on their own as well. We
> feel that Priesthood is defined by active service on many levels.
> Therefore we cannot provide empty "titles" for those who are unable to
> put forth genuine effort."
>
> and
>
> "Each Priestess or Priest will be required to create a complete
> written "plan" for rebuilding the worship of their deity at some
> point, This will need to include not only a historical overview of
> their God or Goddesses ancient worship, but also written rituals for
> the deities festival days, prayers and rites for others who seek to
> worship that deity, offering liturgy, etc."
>
> There is no question about "what?" or "how?" or "who?", Astur. Those
> answers are laid out as clearly and simply as anything I have yet seen
> in any part of our tabularium :-)

Then, please tell me: do I have to arrange anything for the nonae of
November? :-)

It seems that you expect myself to produce a document that says: "I
will be doing this and that for the nonae of November." If that is
what you mean, then Q. Fabius Maximus' answer is perfectly valid: we
are working on it.

[And I am serious; we are working on it. Pontifex Antonius Gryllus and
I are preparing something very special for next June in Northwestern
Spain, next to the Valleys of Cerrato, and you are invited to attend.
;-) ]

If you mean that I should be working on it more quickly, then I could
say: what is the time *you* are giving *me* to produce something like
that? And don't tell me you have given me seven years; I wasn't a
pontifex seven years ago.

By the way: how is the minting of the new coins going? When will I
have coins in my hands? ;-)

> The question is why they are not simply obeying the requirements they
> themselves have created.

Because those requirements are too generalistic, too unspecific.

Don't get me wrong; I agree with you in that no one with religious
duties in Nova Roma (and, again, that includes our magistrates) is
doing everything they should be doing. You seem to be looking for
someone to blame for that situation. I say that *everyone* is to blame
for that situation: the pontifices that have been too inactive, the
magistrates that have been ignoring the problem, the citizens that
have not requested the fulfillment of those duties and that have not
provided help, support and enthusiasm... we all are to blame to a
certain degree.

Now, some citizens are finally demanding on this forum a change in the
situation. Those demands are welcome, especially by those who, perhaps
more silently, have been working towards the same goal. But looking
for a scapegoat will not solve the problem.

The solution I propose is this: let's discuss what *everyone*
(pontifices, flamines, sacerdotes, magistrati, cives) should be doing
to improve the current situation. Once we know precisely what each
person should be doing, we will be able to demand that those things
are actually done.

--------------------------

Later on, Cn. Equitius wrote again:

> The difficulty I have in absorbing and accepting your response to
> Celetrus is that I have searched the archives of this Forum, and the
> Nova Roma website, over the past three years and found fully-formed
> and described rituals or prayers for the following festivals, deities,
> and occasions:

[snip]

> These rites, prayers, etc. were published by, among others:
>
> Cassius Iulianus
> Iulius Scaurus
> Minucius Hadrinus
> Cincinnatus Augur
> Modia Lupa
> Popillius Laenas
> Bruttius Sura
>
> and...
>
> Salvius Astur himself.

And not only did I write about it on the main list; I actually
*performed* those caerimoniae myself, to the best of my abilities --
although I have to confess that I had a lot of help from Scaurus in
the research for the ritual.

That is a very important point. In fact, if everything the Gods
required from us to comply with the contract we (the Republic of Nova
Roma) have "signed" with them was posting a message to a mailing list
every now and then, I would say that the most active "pagan" rigth now
is... Cn. Equitius Cato, a self-proclaimed Christian who nonetheless
posts about the rituals of the Religio Romana on an almost daily
basis. ;-)

To me, it doesn't matter if you can provide thousands of pages of
information (I will be ever grateful if you do help me, of course) on
how our forefathers performed each ritual as much as the problems I am
having to find an altar and to cut my brand new toga (*much* bigger
than yours, by the way) according to Ms. Wilson's specifications
(especially difficult because I have at the same time to cross my
fingers in the hope that she got the specifications right) -- I won't
even mention how difficult it is to obtain calcei, because you might
faint. ;-)

--------------------------

A. Ambrosius Celtrius wrote:

> According to Pontifex Maximus, you are all hard at work reengineering
> the Religio. Some of us would like to see evidence of this in the form
> of rituals honoring the gods.

I can not speak in the name of the Pontifex Maximus. But I assure you
that I am working to reconstruct the sacra publica. I could send you a
photograph of my new toga, if that is what you want. No photos of the
altar yet -- you see, it is difficult to convince people to devote the
time and money it takes to build such a thing, especially when they
are already investing important amounts of time and money in other
Nova Roma projects. But I can give you their names and e-mails and you
can rant them into submission until they build that altar, and I will
be ever grateful to you. :-)

> The pontiffs are ultimately responsible for the lack of religious life
> in NR. You can invest plenty of time and energy on whether or not
> someone is "nefas," or whether women can be in your ranks, but evidently
> you now not only wish to be absolved from serving the public rites, but
> also from your administrative duties.

I bet that wondering whether someone is nefas or whether women can be
included in the Collegium could be labelled "administrative duties".
In any case, I do not wish to be absolved from performing the sacra
publica. I am just pointing out that my duties in that respect are not
well defined. You have quoted just the same texts Cato has quoted, and
I do not read there what rituals I am supposed to be performing.

I would like to *know* what rituals I am supposed to be performing.

> Let's cut to the chase. Pontifex Maximus wrote [...]

> Again, just what have you all been doing? This IS your job, isn't it? It
> IS what Maximus claims you've been doing, isn't it? [...]

I can not speak for Q. Fabius Maximus. You will have to discuss his
statements with him.

> Apparently, only pontifices are confused about their duties.

Pontifices are confused about what sacra publica they are expected to
perform because there is an indefinition about what sacra publica they
are expected to perform. Or can you tell me what should I be doing,
instead of simply telling me that I should be doing something?

> The majority of your post has been nothing but evasion and obfuscation,
> and amounts to nothing more than "let's talk." The title of this post
> suggests that there are such things as "The Duties of the Pontificate,"
> and ends with "Only when we have reached an agreement on what their
> specific duties are will we be able to at least know what should be
> being done."

A good title choice, wasn't it? :-)

> Seven years, and by your own words you have no idea what the specific
> duties of the Nova Roma priesthoods are, yet you have the nerve to
> advocate patience. Moravius Vado wrote a ritual for Kalendis Martiis
> over five years ago. Cassius praised it, Graecus praised it, it's a
> wonderful ritual lost, unused, in the archives. Answer me just one
> question, Salvi, why is this so?

And what do you want us to do it with it? Do you want someone to post
it to this mailing list on every kalendae Martias like if it where an
automatic message? Do you think that that would suffice to comply with
our agreement with the Gods?

If that is what you understand by "complying with your duties", then
we two have a very different idea of what the Religio Romana is all
about.

BENE·VALETE·TV·TVIQVE·OMNES

CN·SALVIVS·T·F·A·NEP·OVF·ASTVR·SCRIPSIT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37773 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
A. Ambrosius Celetrus C. Salvio Astori S.P.D.

Gnaeus Salvius Astur wrote:

> Then, please tell me: do I have to arrange anything for the nonae of
> November? :-)

Oops, sorry, the Ludi Plebeii starts prid. Non, and the answer is still
yes, something should be arranged so that this Ludi is not held in
contempt of the Iupitter, as is the current Ludi Romani.

The comment about your smirk stands.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37774 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
A. Ambrosius Celetrus C. Salvio Astori S.P.D.

Gnaeus Salvius Astur wrote:

> Then, please tell me: do I have to arrange anything for the nonae of
> November? :-)

Someone does, and the fact that you can ask that question with a smirk,
makes it clear that nothing will.

> A good title choice, wasn't it? :-)

No, "The Unfulfilled Duties of the Pontificate, with sundry attempts to
blame others" would have been far more descriptive.

> Moravius Vado wrote a ritual for Kalendis Martiis
> > over five years ago. Cassius praised it, Graecus praised it, it's a
> > wonderful ritual lost, unused, in the archives. Answer me just one
> > question, Salvi, why is this so?
>
> And what do you want us to do it with it? Do you want someone to post
> it to this mailing list on every kalendae Martias like if it where an
> automatic message? Do you think that that would suffice to comply with
>
> our agreement with the Gods?

No, I expect you to use it, or your own, or anyone else's, in some
manner, to see that the Kalendis Martiis, the beginning of the sacral
year, does not go unrecognized.

> we two have a very different idea of what the Religio Romana is all
> about.

Evidently we do, indeed. Here, at my home and to the best of my
abilities, the sacred days are honored.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37775 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Ambrosius Celetrus Equiti Catoni Apollonio Cordo quiritibusque S.P.D.

gaiusequitiuscato wrote:

> I have searched the archives of this Forum, and the
> Nova Roma website, over the past three years and found fully-formed
> and described rituals or prayers for the following festivals, deities,
>
> and occasions:

Thank you, Cato, for doing the work you yourself know I am wont to do. I
believe, Corde, this qualifies as "external corroboration" of Maximus'
statement ""we used to publish the fact we carrying out rituals," and
shows that his, and not Salvius Astur's, "recollection of the history of
Nova Roma" accurately reflects the facts. So I repeat, Astur's post was
obfuscating and evasive.

Also obfuscating is the notion that the difficulties inherent in
physically performing any given ritual have any bearing whatsoever on
its writing. Or are you saying, as a playwright Corde, that you secure
your stage, props and costumes, before you write so much as a word of
your play?

Some rituals clearly exist, and have been offered to the Forum in the
past following the fasti. Most are now neglected. Were the ceremonies
physically performed on these past occasions? I have little doubt that
the flamen Cerialis did. I have absolutely NO doubt that Modia Lupa,
Moravia Aurelia, or for that matter Scaurus or any other pontifex
physically performed the rites. In fact, strike "little" from my
statement about the flamen Cerialis, and substitute "no" for him, too. I
don't doubt that the priests and priestesses who posted these rites in
the past performed them, and find it interesting that both Metellus and
Astur are suggesting otherwise.

Are these rites perfect in either content or performance with respect
ancient practice. I highly doubt it, just as doubt those performed in
antiquity were on every occasion, despite what is written. I have long
argued (privately and publicly for over a year) that the essence of
orthopraxy is reverent formalism, and not slavish and superstitious
repetition. I approach my daily rites as I would approach the Cha no yu,
were I Japanese, but if a barking dog, or a insect bite distracts me
momentarily do I start over? No, because I know that my heart and soul
are doing what they should be, even if my stumbling tongue or distracted
eyes are not. I offer a piaculum, and know that I have fulfilled my
obligations.

Do the Dii Immortales NOT take notice that sometimes They are honored,
and other times not? And that the reason not is human vanity or
laziness? A thousand people worldwide, reading the text of a ritual
honoring Neptune on Kalendis Decembribus is indeed "better than
nothing," better than offering the excuse that the wherewithal to
physically perform it hasn't been acquired. And if no suitable ritual
has yet been written or recovered, then someone needs to offer a
piaculum in its place. Either is infinitely preferable to ignoring the
occasion altogether, and then, later in the day, having a member of the
CP post about a current movie or mini-series, or where to get the best
wool for the toga they will wear, not to perform a ritual, but to hang
out and be cool at the next Roman Days.

There are people in Nova Roma who have accepted the titles and
obligations of flamens, sacerdotes, and pontiffs. They need to stop
making excuses, and honor the Gods and Goddesses they serve; then and
only then, will others in NR come to believe that this is not just some
grand RPG.

vale et valete






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37776 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: a.d. XVI Kal. Oct.
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem XVI Kalendas Octobris; haec dies comitialis est.

"Coniecturalem artem esse medicinam." (Medicine is the art of
guessing) - Aulus Cornelius Celsus

"The Gauls directed their fiercest attack upon the Roman right, and
the Dictator's presence with that division alone prevented the attack
from succeeding. When he saw the men wavering he called out sharply to
Sextius and asked him if this was the way in which he had pledged his
soldiers to fight. "Where," he cried, "are the shouts of the men who
clamoured for arms? Where are their threats of going into battle
without their commander's orders? Here is the commander, calling
loudly to them to fight, and himself fighting in the forefront of the
battle; who out of all those who were just now going to lead the way
was following him? Braggarts in camp, cowards in battle!" They felt
the truth of what they heard, and they were so stung by a sense of
shame that they rushed on the enemy's weapons without any thought of
danger. They charged like madmen and threw the enemy's lines into
confusion, and a cavalry attack which followed turned the confusion
into rout. As soon as the Dictator saw their line broken in this part
of the field he turned the attack on to their left, where he saw them
closing up into a crowded mass, and at the same time gave the agreed
signal to those on the mountain. When a fresh battle shout arose and
these were seen crossing the mountain slope in the direction of the
Gauls' camp, the enemy, afraid of being cut off, gave up the fight and
ran in wild disorder to their camp. They were met by Marcus Valerius,
the Master of the Horse, who after putting their right wing to flight
was riding up to their lines, and he turned their flight towards the
mountain and woods. A great many were intercepted by the muleteers
whom they took for cavalry, and a terrible slaughter took place
amongst those whom panic had driven into the woods after the main
battle was over. No one since Camillus celebrated a more justly
deserved triumph over the Gauls than C. Sulpicius. A large quantity of
gold taken out of the spoil was dedicated by him and stored away in a
vault beneath the Capitol. The campaigns in which the consuls for the
year were engaged ended in a very different way. Whilst the Hernici
were defeated and reduced to submission by his colleague, Fabius
showed a sad want of caution and skill in his operations against the
Tarquinians. The humiliation which Rome incurred through his defeat
was embittered by the barbarity of the enemy, who sacrificed 307
prisoners of war. That defeat was followed by a sudden predatory
incursion of the Privernates and afterwards by one in which the
Veliternians took part. In this year two additional tribes were formed
- the Pomptine and the Publilian. The Games which Camillus had vowed
when Dictator were celebrated. A measure dealing with improper
canvassing was for the first time submitted to the people, after
passing the senate, by C. Poetilius, tribune of the plebs. It was
intended to check the canvassing, mainly by rich plebeians, in the
markets and promiscuous gatherings." - Livy, History of Rome 7.15


"I am Sobek, who dwelleth amid his terrors. I am Sobek, and I seize
[my prey] like a ravening beast. I am the great Fish which is in
Kamui. I am the Lord to whom bowings and prostrations are made in
Sekhem. And the Osiris Ani is the lord to whom bowings and
prostrations are made in Sekhem." - The Book of the Dead, The Chapter
of Making the Transformation into the Crocodile God

In ancient Egypt, today was held in honor of Sobek. Sobek is the
Egyptian god who brings fertility from the Nile waters. He symbolized
the power of the pharaohs. He is regarded as a son of Neith. The
cradle of his cult was el Faiyum, at the ancient border of Upper and
Lower Egypt, although his cult was wide-spread. Here, parts of his
temples can still be found. One of the towns in that vicinity was
called "Crocodilopolis" by the Greeks. Other centers of his cult later
became Kom Ombo and Thebes. Sobek is represented as a crocodile or as
a man with the head of a crocodile. On his head he often wore a pair
or plumes. Later he was associated with the sun-god Re and is then
wearing the solar disc and the uraeus on his crocodile head. Sobek was
called the Lord of Faiyum, and was considered the god who controlled
the waters. The Nile was very important to the people of Egypt. Water
was necessary for the survival of crops, the success of trade, and the
livelihood of fishing. These waters were filled with crocodile, so it
was a matter of common sense to appease them through the worship of
their leader, Sobek.

According to legend, Sobek was a fourfold deity. He represented the
four elemental gods, Ra of fire, Shu of air, Geb of earth, and Osiris
of water. A crocodile, a man with the head of a crocodile, or a
mummified crocodile are used as representations for Sobek. He is
sometimes shown wearing a solar disk and horns like those of Amon-Ra.
Throughout history, he has been known as Sebek, Sebek-Ra, Sobk,
Suchos, Sobki, and Soknopais. The Book of the Dead suggests that
Sobek's closeness to Horus can be traced back to his
participation in the birth of this god. Sobek was responsible for
calling Isis and Nephthys to aid in the protection of the dead. He
was the god from the "Dark Water." It was believed, in some sects,
that Sobek was the creator of the world. These people believed that he
arose from the Dark Water and put the world in order.

Later, Sobek was incorporated into the cult of Amun. Amun was a chief
god in the New Kingdom of Egypt. With his wife, Mut and his son,
Khonsu, the scared family was formed with Amun as the head. They were
known as the Theban Triad. Amun was also associated with the sun god,
Re. He was venerated with as the god Amun-Re. During this time, Sobek
was worshiped as the manifestation of Amun-Re.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy (http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/Livy/), Sobek ("Sobek."
Encyclopedia Mythica. 2005. Encyclopedia Mythica Online.
17 Sep. 2005 <http://www.pantheon.org/articles/s/sobek.html>.) and
(http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/sobek.htm),
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37777 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Ambrosius Celetrus wrote:
> Ambrosius Celetrus Equiti Catoni Apollonio Cordo quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> gaiusequitiuscato wrote:
>
>
>>I have searched the archives of this Forum, and the
>>Nova Roma website, over the past three years and found fully-formed
>>and described rituals or prayers for the following festivals, deities,
>>
>>and occasions:
>
>
> Thank you, Cato, for doing the work you yourself know I am wont to do. I
> believe, Corde, this qualifies as "external corroboration" of Maximus'
> statement ""we used to publish the fact we carrying out rituals," and
> shows that his, and not Salvius Astur's, "recollection of the history of
> Nova Roma" accurately reflects the facts. So I repeat, Astur's post was
> obfuscating and evasive.
>
> Also obfuscating is the notion that the difficulties inherent in
> physically performing any given ritual have any bearing whatsoever on
> its writing. Or are you saying, as a playwright Corde, that you secure
> your stage, props and costumes, before you write so much as a word of
> your play?
>
> Some rituals clearly exist, and have been offered to the Forum in the
> past following the fasti. Most are now neglected. Were the ceremonies
> physically performed on these past occasions? I have little doubt that
> the flamen Cerialis did. I have absolutely NO doubt that Modia Lupa,
> Moravia Aurelia, or for that matter Scaurus or any other pontifex
> physically performed the rites. In fact, strike "little" from my
> statement about the flamen Cerialis, and substitute "no" for him, too. I
> don't doubt that the priests and priestesses who posted these rites in
> the past performed them, and find it interesting that both Metellus and
> Astur are suggesting otherwise.
>
> Are these rites perfect in either content or performance with respect
> ancient practice. I highly doubt it, just as doubt those performed in
> antiquity were on every occasion, despite what is written. I have long
> argued (privately and publicly for over a year) that the essence of
> orthopraxy is reverent formalism, and not slavish and superstitious
> repetition. I approach my daily rites as I would approach the Cha no yu,
> were I Japanese, but if a barking dog, or a insect bite distracts me
> momentarily do I start over? No, because I know that my heart and soul
> are doing what they should be, even if my stumbling tongue or distracted
> eyes are not. I offer a piaculum, and know that I have fulfilled my
> obligations.
>
> Do the Dii Immortales NOT take notice that sometimes They are honored,
> and other times not? And that the reason not is human vanity or
> laziness? A thousand people worldwide, reading the text of a ritual
> honoring Neptune on Kalendis Decembribus is indeed "better than
> nothing," better than offering the excuse that the wherewithal to
> physically perform it hasn't been acquired. And if no suitable ritual
> has yet been written or recovered, then someone needs to offer a
> piaculum in its place. Either is infinitely preferable to ignoring the
> occasion altogether, and then, later in the day, having a member of the
> CP post about a current movie or mini-series, or where to get the best
> wool for the toga they will wear, not to perform a ritual, but to hang
> out and be cool at the next Roman Days.
>
> There are people in Nova Roma who have accepted the titles and
> obligations of flamens, sacerdotes, and pontiffs. They need to stop
> making excuses, and honor the Gods and Goddesses they serve; then and
> only then, will others in NR come to believe that this is not just some
> grand RPG.
>
> vale et valete
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37778 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
My apologies to all for sending a blank e-mail. For some reason I
thought I was approving the post. Ah well, time to get some sleep.

-- Marinus

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:
>
> Ambrosius Celetrus wrote:
>
>>Ambrosius Celetrus Equiti Catoni Apollonio Cordo quiritibusque S.P.D.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37779 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
CN·SALVIVS·A·AMBROSIO·CELETRIO·S·P·D

> > Then, please tell me: do I have to arrange anything for the nonae
> > of November? :-)
>
> Someone does, and the fact that you can ask that question with a
> smirk, makes it clear that nothing will.

Actually, it was not a smirk, but a smile towards a person I have had
the luck to meet this summer and with whom I had some very nice
conversations. That part of my letter was not directed to you. At
all. :-)

However, your reply confirms what I have said. You say that "someone"
has to do something. My question has been all along (and still is):
who has to do what? "Someone" and "something" are not proper answers
to that question.

I will repeat it once more: there is an indefinition about the
religious duties of our priests and magistrates. No matter how long
or how high you keep shouting that "someone should do something",
nothing is likely to be done until *who* should do *what* is defined.

[...]

> No, I expect you to use it, or your own, or anyone else's, in some
> manner, to see that the Kalendis Martiis, the beginning of the
> sacral year, does not go unrecognized.

Same indefinition. Someone, somewhere, should do something.
*That* is why so little is being done.

[...]

> Evidently we do, indeed. Here, at my home and to the best of my
> abilities, the sacred days are honored.

A rugby coach I had when I was a kid gave me this piece of
advice: "Don't ask the three-quarters to sprint when you yourself are
panting". Translated into non-rugby terms, it means something
like: "Be pacient when you request others to do something you are not
willing or able to do yourself".

S·V·B·E·E·V

CN·SALVIVS·T·F·A·NEP·OVF·ASTVR·SCRIPSIT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37780 From: Maior Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
M. Hortensia Gnaeo Asturo spd;
Salve; I just want to say that yes, 'someone' is doing
something for Iuppiter. I'm producing the first broadcast of Nova
Roma's new radio station
And, the first one will be on the Ludi Plebei to honour
Iuppiter! I asked Marcus Horatius to write a piece about this with
prayers to Iuppiter and he's done a wonderful job. A. Apollonius
Cordus is going to read it. Caius Curius Saturninus had the fantastic
idea of this internet radio station.
I think it's a Christian left-over idea to wait to be told
what to do! There are great opportunities for practitioners of the
Religio to do things in Nova Roma. The PM encourages us.
Celetrus just wants to complain, well he can go somewhere
and do so, I and many others are active, willing and able.

I'm happy to say to any of the pontifices "how can I help you?" I have
a great university research library at my disposal and I am here, as
well as starting projects on my own.
di deasque vos ament
Marca Hortensia Maior

>. You say that "someone"
> has to do something. My question has been all along (and still is):
> who has to do what? "Someone" and "something" are not proper answers
> to that question.
>
> I will repeat it once more: there is an indefinition about the
> religious duties of our priests and magistrates. No matter how long
> or how high you keep shouting that "someone should do something",
> nothing is likely to be done until *who* should do *what* is defined.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37781 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Salve,
Radio SPQR? :)
Vale, Quintus Servilius Priscus

On 9/17/05, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia Gnaeo Asturo spd;
> Salve; I just want to say that yes, 'someone' is doing
> something for Iuppiter. I'm producing the first broadcast of Nova
> Roma's new radio station
> And, the first one will be on the Ludi Plebei to honour
> Iuppiter! I asked Marcus Horatius to write a piece about this with
> prayers to Iuppiter and he's done a wonderful job. A. Apollonius
> Cordus is going to read it. Caius Curius Saturninus had the fantastic
> idea of this internet radio station.
> I think it's a Christian left-over idea to wait to be told
> what to do! There are great opportunities for practitioners of the
> Religio to do things in Nova Roma. The PM encourages us.
> Celetrus just wants to complain, well he can go somewhere
> and do so, I and many others are active, willing and able.
>
> I'm happy to say to any of the pontifices "how can I help you?" I have
> a great university research library at my disposal and I am here, as
> well as starting projects on my own.
> di deasque vos ament
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
> >. You say that "someone"
> > has to do something. My question has been all along (and still is):
> > who has to do what? "Someone" and "something" are not proper answers
> > to that question.
> >
> > I will repeat it once more: there is an indefinition about the
> > religious duties of our priests and magistrates. No matter how long
> > or how high you keep shouting that "someone should do something",
> > nothing is likely to be done until *who* should do *what* is defined.
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> - Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>"
> on the web.
> - To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
> - Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37782 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
A. Ambrosius Celetrus C. Salvius Astori S.D.

Gnaeus Salvius Astur wrote:

> Same indefinition. Someone, somewhere, should do something.
> *That* is why so little is being done.
>
> [...]
>
> "Be pacient when you request others to do something you are not
> willing or able to do yourself".

Ponitfex Astur, pick one of the score of people who hold a religious
title in NR, and accepted the obligations that go with that title, and
have them do the job. They are the pool of "someones" from which you
must accomplish the "somethings" that are not being done, and quit
whining about the fact that you have accepted these obligations. If no
one is willing to prepare a ceremony to start the Ludi Plebeii, you do
it. If you can't or won't, resign.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37783 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
A. Ambrosius Celetrus M. Hortensiaw Maiori s.d.

Maior wrote:

> M. Hortensia Gnaeo Asturo spd;
> Salve; I just want to say that yes, 'someone' is doing
> something for Iuppiter. I'm producing the first broadcast of Nova
> Roma's new radio station

Bravo. And I shall write a sestina for the occasion. Of course, I
wouldn't dream of asking that it be included on your broadcast. I will
simply post it to the List.

> And, the first one will be on the Ludi Plebei to honour
> Iuppiter! I asked Marcus Horatius to write a piece about this with
> prayers to Iuppiter and he's done a wonderful job.

Thank you for making my point. Horatius Piscinus could write prayers to
honor Iuppiter, Pontifex Astur needs more time to discuss what his
"duties are.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37784 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate-An Opinion
F. Galerius Aurelianus Flamen Cerealis S.P.D.

Cato has quoted all of the correct sections of the Constitution concerning
the duties of the Pontificate, the Flamens, and other officiants of the Religio.
I am just a simple Plebeian flamen but I see way to much oil being burned in
the lamps of "procedure & argument" and not enough being burned on the altars
of the Gods. The basis of the Religio was and remains the private household
rites and those of the patron Gods of the classes & the Republic. There can
be no stronger statement of dedication, piety, and devotion by the Pontificate
and the Flamens than to hold the physical rites on behalf of the Republic and
then post what was done on the ML and related religio sites.
While each member of the Sacred Colleges should strive for a historically
correct ritual properly researched and performed, we cannot always expect
perfection which is why we offer the piaculum. It is, in my opinion, far more
important to offer worship, honor, and sacrifice to the Gods on the appropriate days
and festivals in the best way we can do so. We can always strive for
improvement as we move forward with our research.
I am sure that there will be some citizens who agree with this opinion and
some who do not; just as there will be some members of the sacred colleges who
agree and disagree to one extent or another. However, this is merely an
opinion and not a challenge to anyone so I would prefer that I not be electronically
torn to pieces by brethren in the Sacred Colleges.
May the Goddess grant the Republic and her citizens full fields and bountiful
harvests.
Valete.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37785 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate-An Opinion
G. Equitius Cato F. Galerio Aureliano Gn. Salvio Asturi M. Hortensiae
Maori quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Aurelianus, you wrote:

"There can be no stronger statement of dedication, piety, and devotion
by the Pontificate and the Flamens than to hold the physical rites on
behalf of the Republic and then post what was done on the ML and
related religio sites."

Exactly. It really is that simple. Thank you.

Astur, amice, I believe that you, and Metellus, and actually *all* of
the College of Pontiffs truly are interested in the welfare of the
relationship between the Republic and the gods. I believe that there
is a great deal of information and intelligence behind the work of the
College, and have witnessed it to some extent on the Religio List. I
just ask that the work that has already been done, as evidenced by the
numerous rites that have taken place *and been posted in the Forum* in
the past on important days, not be left to gather dust, but be
exercized.

Hortensia Maior, the same applies to your comments: I believe that you
personally are dedicated to the correct reconstruction of the religio;
I believe that you desire a healthy and agreeable relationship between
the citizens and the College of Pontiffs, and that interaction with
the College should be based on mutual respect and an appreciation for
the work they have already done. I simply would like to see some
activity coming out of the College on the most important days on the
calendar; days which they themselves should be proclaiming, rather
than leaving it to me and my attempts in ordering the calendar.

Let me admit something here: when Celetrus and I were having our
little...contretemps regarding the calendar, and I announced in a fit
of pique that I was going to drop it, yes, I was looking (at least a
little bit) for my ego to be assuaged. I was, however, actually
afraid that, as Celetrus mentioned, the calendar might join the rites
of the Robigalia and Vinalia etc. et al. in disappearing into the mist
--- so I returned to it. If the College announced that they were
going to take up their responsibility to produce the calendar, half of
me would say "Whoopie!" as a response to their actually taking a
noticeable part in the lives of the citizens of the Republic; the
other half would say, "Rats!", because I like doing it myself :-)

So while I am loathe to give up the calendar, I ask at least that the
pontiffs make their presence known on our great festivals. They have
done so in the past, and it is their responsibility.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37786 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: LUDI CIRCENSES
LUDI ROMANI: Ludi Circenses


It's a dry and dusty day in the circus maximus. The
horses are harnessed to the chariots and are snorting
and stomping as they wait to enter the carceres.
Between the chatter of those already in their seats
and the shouts and grunts of late-comers elbowing
their way throw the crowd, not to mention the
musicians and acrobats, the noise is immense.

While the crowd begins to settle down, the aedilis
curulis directs a slave to place the charioteers' lots
in the urn and mix them well. The aedilis draws the
first lot and reads out the name: Felix Celeris, in
the chariot Velox Puteulanus Sors. Celeris is racing
for the factio veneta, the blues, and the chariot is
owned by L. Vitellius Triarius. The blues are well
represented in this race, with two of the four
chariots, but these races are an unpredictable
business and strength of numbers is no guarantee of
victory, particularly if the team's charioteers don't
coordinate their tactics.

Celeris looks unhappy at having to choose his
starting-position before the others; it will let them
arrange themselves around him. He'll just have to hope
that his team-mate chooses well. Celeris is dithering
- no, he's chosen the second starting-position from
the spina; he leads his horses over to the carcer.
Meanwhile the next lot has been drawn: it's the other
blue! That really does reduce their advantage. This
chariot, Orionis Draco, is owned by T. Licinius
Crassus and driven by Equus Magnus. The horses and the
driver are real veterans: they've been racing together
for the blues for years, even surviving the
notoriously blood-stained ludi victoriae of aedilis
Cn. Equitius Marinus. But he's never won a major race
- could this be his chance? He chooses the outside
track - not normally a favourite position, but with
his team-mate close to the inside he may have an
unorthodox idea in his mind.

The next lot falls to Petronius Gripho in his chariot
Vita Brevis. Gripho was bought for a large sum last
year for factio albata by Cn. Equitius Marinus, but he
had been racing in the provinces long before and has
an even more impressive record than Equus Magnus,
including a victory in his first ever race for Cn.
Equitius, as well as several placements in the finals
of games since then. The horses and chariot he's
driving have just as distinguished a record as he has,
and have been racing for the whites even before Gripho
took them over from their previous driver, Admiratius
Magnus, who was found stabbed to death in his
dressing-room two years ago during the ludi Florales.
Without hesitation, Gripho chooses the inside track
and marches toward the starting-post with a cheery
wave to his supporters in the stands.

That leaves our fourth competitor, a relative novice
running here in his first race in the city of Rome. A
German by birth, tall and fair-haired, he has been
something of a favourite in his home province and has
only recently been bought by a new patron, C. Aurelia
Falconis, for the factio praesina. The name of his
chariot, Velociraptor, has caused no less puzzlement
among the Latin-speaking locals than his own name,
Spandex - a more barbaric sound few Romans have ever
heard. He has no choice of his position, but must
insert himself between the two blue chariots.

The chariots and their teams are all in their carceres
now, and the charioteers are getting their horses
ready for the race. Equus Magnus is whispering in the
ear of his lead horse; Spandex is shouting strange
Germanic exhortations at his team; Gripho is slapping
his horses on their rumps, while Celeris is already
taking the whip to his horses to get them worked up.
The trumpets sound; a hush falls over the crowd. The
horses are close to frenzy now, hammering on the bars
of the carceres with their hooves and even butting
them with their heads.

The aedilis lifts the mappa... and lets it fall. The
trumpets blare again. The race is on.

The chariots are heading for the creta; none of them
break for position yet, but most of them try to head
toward the inside lane, hoping to be close to the
spina when they cross the creta and the running begins
in earnest. Spandex, though, sticks firmly to his
course, matching Equus Magnus' speed and blocking him
from pulling in toward the inside.

Just before the chariots reach the creta, Spandex
lashes his horses and his chariot leaps forward,
making a bid for the lead. The next across the line is
Gripho, setting a steady pace and trying to keep some
space between himself and the spina: he knows he can't
afford to get crushed against it as the other
charioteers crowd in on the turn. On his right is
Celeris for the blues, who seems to be content to
leave Gripho in peace for now. But Equus Magnus is
having trouble: he wants to get closer to the inside,
or else he'll have to wear his horses out travelling
further around the turns than the others; but to do
that he must get past Spandex, who seems to be
sticking resolutely to the middle of the track and
showing no interest in moving to the inside at all.
Magnus could try to force him to the left, but the
first lap is usually too early for aggressive driving;
he could try to overtake, but that risks wearing his
horses out; he could drop behind, but that could cost
him valuable time. For now, with a disgruntled
grimace, he stays on the outside, trying to match
Spandex' pace.

They're coming up to the first turn. Spandex has a
slight lead, but it's cancelled out by the fact that
he's so far from the spina. Next it's Gripho on the
inside, keeping an arm's length from the spina to
avoid a crash. Celeris pulls in for a tight turn,
coming close to Gripho but not too close. As the
drivers come out of the turn it's Gripho and Celeris
neck and neck, with Spandex and Magnus a few strides
behind.

The horses thunder on, cheered by the crowds (except
for the supporters of factio russata, who have no
representative in the race and content themselves with
heckling occasionally). Now Spandex is putting on
speed, and Magnus seems determined to match him. They
both pull ahead of the rest, and now surely Spandex
will move to his left and head for the spina. But no;
he's sticking to his line. What's he playing at? Over
seven laps this sort of driving could add a kilometer
or more to the total distance his horses have to
travel. But he is succeeding in irritating Magnus, who
is stuck on the outside and will have to travel even
further than Spandex unless he can get closer to the
spina.

As the chariots approach the second turn some space is
beginning to show between the competitors. Celeris and
Gripho are both steady, turning close to the spina and
keeping a steady pace; but his position on the
innermost track gives Gripho a slight advantage, and
as they emerge from the turn Celeris is beginning to
fall behind. At this early stage in the race, though,
there's no great cause for concern, and Celeris
appears to be saving his horses. Meanwhile, Spandex
and Magnus reach the turn together, not long after the
others, still a long way from the spina. This strange
German tactic seems to be doing Spandex no favours,
but it really is bothering Magnus, who seems to be
losing any hope of second-guessing the newcomer's
moves. The first dolphin is taken down.

Back on the straight it's Gripho for the whites, then
Spandex for the greens, and then Magnus and Celeris
for the blues. But now Magnus seems determined to make
something happen. He bides his time until they've come
round the next turn and are coming out onto the
straight leading back to the starting line. Now,
leaning forward, he whips his horses on the withers;
his chariot pulls away to the right and then veers
suddenly left on a collision course with Spandex. He's
trying to force Spandex left. But Spandex has been
expecting this; he whips on his own horses and bursts
ahead just as Magnus approaches. Magnus passes
straight behind the German's chariot and heads for
that of his team-mate Celeris.

Surprise briefly prevents Magnus reacting, but at
length he recovers his senses and tugs hard on the
reins to bring his horses round. It's only just in
time; any later and he'd have crashed straight into
Celeris. As it is, his axle strikes the axle of his
team-mate's chariot and causes both to jump and shake;
the drivers remain in control, however, and a
dangerous crash is averted.

Nonetheless, coming up to the turn, the positions have
changed dramatically: now on the outside and some
strides ahead is Spandex in Velociraptor, followed by
Gripho on the inside, and a short distance behind are
the two blues, now axle-to-axle in the two central
lanes. Going round the turn Gripho manages to hold his
position; Spandex, still some distance from the spina,
falls behind, coming level with Magnus, and Celeris,
shaken by the near-miss, is several strides behind as
the second dolphin falls.

Still five laps to go, and despite the early drama the
chariots are still keeping close together. Now on the
straight it's Gripho first, then Magnus, Spandex, and
Celeris. Magnus seems to have learned a lesson from
his near-miss, and is in no hurry to overtake Gripho;
nor, indeed, is Gripho in any great hurry himself, for
his steady pace and inside position have kept him in
or near the lead since almost the beginning of the
race. Approaching the turn, however, Spandex for the
first time makes a tactical move of his own. Putting
on an extra spurt of speed to bring him level with
Magnus, he turns slightly more sharply than on
previous laps, bringing him steadily closer to Magnus
as the blue charioteer comes into the turn. Magnus
doesn't want another run-in with Spandex now; he
steers left to avoid Spandex, but in doing so he draws
in front of his team-mate Celeris and alongside
Gripho.

Spandex comes out of the turn at a shallow angle and
returns to his place a fair distance from the spina,
but he has succeeded in crowding the blues so that
Magnus is now blocking Celeris' way, with Gripho still
on the inside lane. By the time they reach the turn at
the far end of the circus, Magnus is in the lead, but
Gripho is close on his left, and Celeris is still
stuck behind Magnus' chariot. He looks very annoyed.

Now Celeris must make a decision of his own. Does he
stay behind Magnus, or try to get back into
contention? If he wants to do that, he'll have to pass
Magnus on the right or on the left. There's plenty of
space on the right, because Spandex is keeping his
distance; but that will mean giving up his
advantageous position close to the spina. But if he
wants to pass on the left he'll have to insert his
chariot into the narrow gap between Magnus and Gripho,
and that could be dangerous. In the event, the
decision is made for him, because Spandex repeats his
move from the last turn: he crowds in on Magnus'
right-hand side, pushing Magnus close to Gripho and
making Gripho take the the turn dangerously tight and
dangerously close to the spina. Gripho's an
experienced driver, and he brings his horses through
the turn safely, but there's certainly no room for
another chariot between him and Magnus. Celeris takes
the turn shallow, and as the third dolphin falls he
emerges onto the straight between Magnus and Spandex,
now third from the spina but drawing closer to the
front-runners Gripho and Magnus.

There's still everything to play for, and victory is
within the grasp of each of these drivers. Who will
come out in front? Find out tomorrow...



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37787 From: RANDALL HERRERA RIOS Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: My registration
Salve

Last week I was accepted as a new citizen of Nova
Roma. They told me I had to wait for 90 days to become
a member with full rights... after passing a little
test. Now I have a doubt. What am I supposed to do? Do
I have to wait for the test they are going to send me?
Or do I have to ask for it to be sent to me?
Please, help me.
This is simple, but I don't want to lose this
opportunity to become a member of Nova Roma just for
my idleness. I had to ask you!

Valete

Servius Iulius Pertinax



______________________________________________
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!
Nuevos servicios, más seguridad
http://correo.yahoo.es
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37788 From: coincollectors1 Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Nova Roma Coins
Hi,

How can I obtain the Nova Roma coins?

Thanks,

Oded Paz
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37789 From: Jose Damian Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: My registration
Apparently, they will send you the test shortly, I recently sent in my application but have still not received word. How long did you have to wait for a reply?

RANDALL HERRERA RIOS <sumvitaetal@...> wrote:Salve

Last week I was accepted as a new citizen of Nova
Roma. They told me I had to wait for 90 days to become
a member with full rights... after passing a little
test. Now I have a doubt. What am I supposed to do? Do
I have to wait for the test they are going to send me?
Or do I have to ask for it to be sent to me?
Please, help me.
This is simple, but I don't want to lose this
opportunity to become a member of Nova Roma just for
my idleness. I had to ask you!

Valete

Servius Iulius Pertinax



______________________________________________
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!
Nuevos servicios, más seguridad
http://correo.yahoo.es




SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire Roman empire coin Roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





Jose D. Esparza



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37790 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: My registration
Sale Servi Iuli,

Servius Iulius Pertinax <sumvitaetal@...> writes:

> Last week I was accepted as a new citizen of Nova
> Roma. They

That would be me. I am "they" when it comes to citizenship applications these
days.

> told me I had to wait for 90 days to become
> a member with full rights... after passing a little
> test. Now I have a doubt. What am I supposed to do?

Study the NovaRoma.org website. Read the different parts about the government
and the Religio and the history of Nova Roma and of Roma Antiqua. You have
three months to study it all.

> Do I have to wait for the test they are going to send me?

When you've completed your probationary period one of the Rogatores will
notify you that it's time for you to take the test.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37791 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
coincollectors1 <paz@...> writes:

> Hi,
>
> How can I obtain the Nova Roma coins?

The original run of sesterci has been exhausted, and they are all in
circulation. Perhaps someone reading this has a coin that they'll be willing
to sell you.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37792 From: Ursula Numeria Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
Is there any chance there will be a second run? Might
come in handy for anyone wishing to marry by ceremony
of coemptio. :)

--- Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:

> coincollectors1 <paz@...> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > How can I obtain the Nova Roma coins?
>
> The original run of sesterci has been exhausted, and
> they are all in
> circulation. Perhaps someone reading this has a
> coin that they'll be willing
> to sell you.
>
> Vale,
>
> -- Marinus
>




__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37793 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
Salve Ursula Numeria,

Ursula Numeria <ursulanumeria@...> writes:

> Is there any chance there will be a second run? Might
> come in handy for anyone wishing to marry by ceremony
> of coemptio. :)

Right now a group of private citizens is working on the problem of producing
more Nova Roma coins. I hope that they will have coins for us within the
next few months.

In the meantime, should you know anyone contemplating marriage cum manu by
coemptio, I feel sure a coin can be found.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37794 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
A. Apollonius A. Ambrosio omnibusque sal.

I'm sorry that you found my message to be largely a
statement of the obvious. Indeed, largely it was. All
I can say is that perhaps, if you find people taking
the trouble to state the obvious to you, perhaps you
are giving the impression that you haven't grasped the
obvious yet.

As for the rest, it seems to me that your conversation
with Cn. Salvius has discovered the crucial point.
It's not that he is not doing his job: he is doing his
job as he understands it, but his understanding of his
job is different from yours. He considers that the
important thing is to actually perform the necessary
rituals, and that his time is best spent working
toward this rather than simply re-posting descriptions
of rituals which no one is performing. You consider
that it would be better for him to post them even if
he is unable to perform them.

Well, I have to say that those various texts from the
constitution and the website which you and Cato have
quoted tend to support his interpretation rather than
yours: they say a lot about performing rituals and not
very much about posting descriptions of rituals which
have not been performed. But that's as may be. The
point is he, as probably other pontifices, is doing
what he thinks he ought to be doing. If you want to
say, then, that the pontifices are doing the wrong
thing, fair enough; but please do not say that they
are doing nothing at all.

You may well say that this doesn't explain why rituals
have gone unperformed up to now. No, indeed it
doesn't. Clearly there have been failures in the past.
But this cannot be taken as evidence of failures
occurring now. If you want to know why this or that
ritual went unperformed last year, that's a very
reasonable question; I merely point out that when you
demand answers from Metellus and Astur you're asking
the wrong people. I, like you, would like to know why
more progress has not been made over the last seven
years. But I, unlike you, know that there is nothing
to be gained from trying to extract that information
from people who haven't got it.





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37795 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-17
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
A. Apollonius C. Equitio omnibusque sal.

> Cordus, you know that I respect your intelligence
> and objectivity in
> pretty much every possible instance. I also trust
> in your integrity.
> The difficulty I have in absorbing and accepting
> your response to
> Celetrus is that I have searched the archives of
> this Forum, and the
> Nova Roma website, over the past three years and
> found fully-formed
> and described rituals or prayers for the following
> festivals, deities,
> and occasions:

(A nice long list follows.)

That's great, amice, but again we come back to the
point Astur made earlier. Having a description of a
ritual isn't enough; one must also perform it. This
requires time, money, and coordination. Time not only
because the ritual physically takes a certain number
of minutes from start to finish but because those
minutes must be found on the specific day when the
ritual is required, often even at the specific hour on
the specific day. Money because the materials for the
ritual must be bought or made, including not only any
offerings to be made but the altar on which to make
them, the toga to wear while making them, and so on.
And coordination because it needs to be ensured that
precisely one pontifex, no more and no fewer, is going
to perform the ritual. (I leave aside the point that
some of those rituals ought not to be performed by
pontifices at all.)

These are not insuperable obstacles, but they are
obstacles. I rather suspect that the most important
obstacle in the past has been coordination. It's well
known that the collegium pontificum has in the past
suffered from serious difficulties with its
decision-making procedures, and has indeed spent long
periods in almost total paralysis. This would not be
such a problem if the pontifices were free, as they
were historically, to act independently; but our
constitution (pttuh) and their own internal
regulations prevent them.

It is true, of course, that a pontifex could simply
decide, unilaterally, to perform a ritual and take the
risk that another pontifex may attempt to perform the
same ritual at the same time. This might be rather
better than the alternative, especially given that the
likelihood of two pontifices performing the same
ritual at the same time seems fairly low at the
moment, when so few rituals are being performed at
all. But it has happened in the past, and one can
understand why a pontifex might be keen to avoid it.
The need for coordination is especially clear when we
consider that a ritual may well need to be performed
at noon, in a consecrated location, on a Tuesday. A
pontifex who wants to perform this ritual will most
likely have to take a day off work, which he will be
reluctant to do if there is any chance that it's
unnecessary for him to do so. And of course here we
find our third obstacle, too, since a day off work is
a day's less income, meaning less money to spend on...
rituals.

The existence of these descriptions in the archives is
useful, I'm sure, but it doesn't mean that suddenly
there's no obstacle preventing those rituals being
performed. Obstacles should not be used as excuses, to
be sure: they should be overcome. But to overcome them
we need to identify them and understand them. I fear
that A. Ambrosius is having trouble telling the
difference between excuses designed to deflect
criticism and genuine efforts to explain and
understand the nature of the obstacles. It seems to me
that what we are hearing from Astur is the latter, not
the former, and I feel sure that considerably more
progress will be made by engaging constructively with
his points than by Celetrus' current strategy.





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37796 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
chances are slim. There was a heavy debate about a
second run of coins but that quickly turned into a
shouting match of historical & legalities.Get used to
it.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<ursulanumeria@...> wrote:
> Is there any chance there will be a second run?
Might
> come in handy for anyone wishing to marry by
ceremony
> of coemptio. :)
>
> --- Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
wrote:
>
> > coincollectors1 <paz@...> writes:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > How can I obtain the Nova Roma coins?
> >
> > The original run of sesterci has been exhausted,
and
> > they are all in
> > circulation. Perhaps someone reading this has a
> > coin that they'll be willing
> > to sell you.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > -- Marinus
> >
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> http://mail.yahoo.com


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37797 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: WSPQR radio 753
Salve Romans

I am very glad that someone is organizing and has the technical expertise to start a NR internet Radio station/program. It is a great idea but not necessarily a new one as it was suggested a few years ago when one of our members resigned her citizenship because of declining eye sight.

It was a good idea then as it is now.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus




----- Original Message -----
From: Ambrosius Celetrus<mailto:Aulus.Ambrosius.Celetrus@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Duties of the Pontificate


A. Ambrosius Celetrus M. Hortensiaw Maiori s.d.

Maior wrote:

> M. Hortensia Gnaeo Asturo spd;
> Salve; I just want to say that yes, 'someone' is doing
> something for Iuppiter. I'm producing the first broadcast of Nova
> Roma's new radio station

Bravo. And I shall write a sestina for the occasion. Of course, I
wouldn't dream of asking that it be included on your broadcast. I will
simply post it to the List.

> And, the first one will be on the Ludi Plebei to honour
> Iuppiter! I asked Marcus Horatius to write a piece about this with
> prayers to Iuppiter and he's done a wonderful job.

Thank you for making my point. Horatius Piscinus could write prayers to
honor Iuppiter, Pontifex Astur needs more time to discuss what his
"duties are.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire+coin&w5=Roman+empire&c=5&s=126&.sig=L1d6yKy3PF4ZQBtii3_vag> Fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire+coin&w5=Roman+empire&c=5&s=126&.sig=le9zl9VVaDOPOzdPerrL7A> The fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire+coin&w5=Roman+empire&c=5&s=126&.sig=W-6NOWAx0WiMXCvAcv6vsA>
Roman empire coin<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire+coin&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire+coin&w5=Roman+empire&c=5&s=126&.sig=q8_gpXC_tjZpGi3nGR8dxQ> Roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire+coin&w5=Roman+empire&c=5&s=126&.sig=ZhN_SdZEj2vmlLyfK0VokA>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37798 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
Salve my friend Marcvs Flavivs Fides

I believe that a group of NR citizens on at this very moment organizing to produce new coins as a private venture.
We just need to give them a little time.

vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: raymond fuentes<mailto:praefectus2324@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: Re: [Nova-Roma] Nova Roma Coins


chances are slim. There was a heavy debate about a
second run of coins but that quickly turned into a
shouting match of historical & legalities.Get used to
it.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
<ursulanumeria@...<mailto:ursulanumeria@...>> wrote:
> Is there any chance there will be a second run?
Might
> come in handy for anyone wishing to marry by
ceremony
> of coemptio. :)
>
> --- Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
wrote:
>
> > coincollectors1 <paz@...> writes:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > How can I obtain the Nova Roma coins?
> >
> > The original run of sesterci has been exhausted,
and
> > they are all in
> > circulation. Perhaps someone reading this has a
> > coin that they'll be willing
> > to sell you.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > -- Marinus
> >
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> http://mail.yahoo.com<http://mail.yahoo.com/>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com<http://mail.yahoo.com/>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37799 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
I stand corrected. Finally something positive and not
the usual scroll rattling that occurs here. Gratias.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <spqr753@...> wrote:
> Salve my friend Marcvs Flavivs Fides
>
> I believe that a group of NR citizens on at this
very moment organizing to produce new coins as a
private venture.
> We just need to give them a little time.
>
> vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: raymond
fuentes<mailto:praefectus2324@...>
> To:
Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>

> Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 12:08 AM
> Subject: Re: Re: [Nova-Roma] Nova Roma Coins
>
>
> chances are slim. There was a heavy debate about a
> second run of coins but that quickly turned into a
> shouting match of historical & legalities.Get used
to
> it.
> ---
Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
>
<ursulanumeria@...<mailto:ursulanumeria@...>>
wrote:
> > Is there any chance there will be a second run?
> Might
> > come in handy for anyone wishing to marry by
> ceremony
> > of coemptio. :)
> >
> > --- Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > > coincollectors1 <paz@...> writes:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > How can I obtain the Nova Roma coins?
> > >
> > > The original run of sesterci has been
exhausted,
> and
> > > they are all in
> > > circulation. Perhaps someone reading this has
a
> > > coin that they'll be willing
> > > to sell you.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > -- Marinus
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> > http://mail.yahoo.com<http://mail.yahoo.com/>
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> http://mail.yahoo.com<http://mail.yahoo.com/>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group
"Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>"
on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an
email to:
>
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37800 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Roman Bingo
Salve

FYI

www.romanbingo.com/<http://www.romanbingo.com/>


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37801 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Forget Roman Bingo site
Salve

Please disregard this site it is an online bingo site that is for gamblers and will COST you money.

vale

TGP
----- Original Message -----
From: Timothy P. Gallagher<mailto:spqr753@...>
To: Nova-Roma<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 1:21 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Roman Bingo


Salve

FYI

www.romanbingo.com/<http://www.romanbingo.com/<http://www.romanbingo.com/<http://www.romanbingo.com/>>


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37802 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
G. Equitius Cato M. Flavio Fidelio Ti. Galerio Paulino quiritibusque
S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

As a matter of fact, the group of citizens is extremely close to
finalizing the presentation to the Senate regarding the production of
the new coin.

Valete bene,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> I stand corrected. Finally something positive and not
> the usual scroll rattling that occurs here. Gratias.
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <spqr753@m...> wrote:
> > Salve my friend Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> >
> > I believe that a group of NR citizens on at this
> very moment organizing to produce new coins as a
> private venture.
> > We just need to give them a little time.
> >
> > vale
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: raymond
> fuentes<mailto:praefectus2324@y...>
> > To:
> Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
>
> > Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 12:08 AM
> > Subject: Re: Re: [Nova-Roma] Nova Roma Coins
> >
> >
> > chances are slim. There was a heavy debate about a
> > second run of coins but that quickly turned into a
> > shouting match of historical & legalities.Get used
> to
> > it.
> > ---
> Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> >
> <ursulanumeria@y...<mailto:ursulanumeria@y...>>
> wrote:
> > > Is there any chance there will be a second run?
> > Might
> > > come in handy for anyone wishing to marry by
> > ceremony
> > > of coemptio. :)
> > >
> > > --- Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@c...>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > coincollectors1 <paz@s...> writes:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > How can I obtain the Nova Roma coins?
> > > >
> > > > The original run of sesterci has been
> exhausted,
> > and
> > > > they are all in
> > > > circulation. Perhaps someone reading this has
> a
> > > > coin that they'll be willing
> > > > to sell you.
> > > >
> > > > Vale,
> > > >
> > > > -- Marinus
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com<http://mail.yahoo.com/>
> >
> >
> > S P Q R
> >
> > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> >
> > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > Roman Citizen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> > http://mail.yahoo.com<http://mail.yahoo.com/>
> >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > a.. Visit your group
> "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>"
> on the web.
> >
> > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an
> email to:
> >
>
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
> >
> === Message Truncated ===
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37803 From: Maior Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: WSPQR radio 753
M. Hortensia Omnibus spd;
Salve; all the credit goes to terrific Caius Curius
Saturninus! it was his idea which he posted here on the ML. And he's
the genius with the technical voice files. He's a great person but
hides his light under a bushel, rare here in NR;-)

I love the idea of "spqr" so I'm going to check with everyone and
our Latinist. I volunteered to do it, and so did Cordus, and Marcus
Horatius, Aula Scholastica.....Anyone else who'd like to do
something in this terrific enterprise come on over to
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/romanpodcast/

Also thanks to brilliant Saturninus I've downloaded Skype a free
internet telephony software http://www.skype.com/ So now I've
talked to him and Emilia Finnica in Finland and Cordus and Livia..!
It's wonderful and makes Nova Roma that much more real.
bene valete
Marca Hortensia Maior
>
> Salve Romans
>
> I am very glad that someone is organizing and has the technical
expertise to start a NR internet Radio station/program. It is a
great idea but not necessarily a new one as it was suggested a few
years ago when one of our members resigned her citizenship because
of declining eye sight.
>
> It was a good idea then as it is now.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ambrosius Celetrus<mailto:Aulus.Ambrosius.Celetrus@a...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 2:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
>
>
> A. Ambrosius Celetrus M. Hortensiaw Maiori s.d.
>
> Maior wrote:
>
> > M. Hortensia Gnaeo Asturo spd;
> > Salve; I just want to say that yes, 'someone' is
doing
> > something for Iuppiter. I'm producing the first broadcast of
Nova
> > Roma's new radio station
>
> Bravo. And I shall write a sestina for the occasion. Of course, I
> wouldn't dream of asking that it be included on your broadcast.
I will
> simply post it to the List.
>
> > And, the first one will be on the Ludi Plebei to honour
> > Iuppiter! I asked Marcus Horatius to write a piece about this
with
> > prayers to Iuppiter and he's done a wonderful job.
>
> Thank you for making my point. Horatius Piscinus could write
prayers to
> honor Iuppiter, Pontifex Astur needs more time to discuss what
his
> "duties are.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire
&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire+coin&w5=Roman+empire
&c=5&s=126&.sig=L1d6yKy3PF4ZQBtii3_vag> Fall of the roman
empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+rom
an+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire+coin&w5=Rom
an+empire&c=5&s=126&.sig=le9zl9VVaDOPOzdPerrL7A> The fall of the
roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the
+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire+coin&w5
=Roman+empire&c=5&s=126&.sig=W-6NOWAx0WiMXCvAcv6vsA>
> Roman empire coin<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
t=ms&k=Roman+empire+coin&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empi
re&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire+coin&w5=Roman+empi
re&c=5&s=126&.sig=q8_gpXC_tjZpGi3nGR8dxQ> Roman
empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3
=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire+coin&w5=Roman+empire&c=
5&s=126&.sig=ZhN_SdZEj2vmlLyfK0VokA>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-
Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-
unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37804 From: M. Gladius Agricola Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
Salve Amice,

I agree, chances are slim that we will see a second run of the
*original* NR sestertii. Chances are very good, however, that we will
see a supply of *new* NR sestertii.

M. Gladius Agricola


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> chances are slim. There was a heavy debate about a
> second run of coins but that quickly turned into a
> shouting match of historical & legalities.Get used to
> it.
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> <ursulanumeria@y...> wrote:
> > Is there any chance there will be a second run?
> Might
> > come in handy for anyone wishing to marry by
> ceremony
> > of coemptio. :)
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37805 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
That is most welcome news. I pray to the Gods there
wont be the usual legal and the ancients didnt do it
that way stuff.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato M. Flavio Fidelio Ti. Galerio
Paulino quiritibusque
> S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> As a matter of fact, the group of citizens is
extremely close to
> finalizing the presentation to the Senate regarding
the production of
> the new coin.
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
> <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> > I stand corrected. Finally something positive and
not
> > the usual scroll rattling that occurs here.
Gratias.
> > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <spqr753@m...>
wrote:
> > > Salve my friend Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > >
> > > I believe that a group of NR citizens on at this
> > very moment organizing to produce new coins as a
> > private venture.
> > > We just need to give them a little time.
> > >
> > > vale
> > >
> > > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: raymond
> > fuentes<mailto:praefectus2324@y...>
> > > To:
> >
Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> >
> > > Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 12:08 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Re: [Nova-Roma] Nova Roma Coins
> > >
> > >
> > > chances are slim. There was a heavy debate
about a
> > > second run of coins but that quickly turned
into a
> > > shouting match of historical & legalities.Get
used
> > to
> > > it.
> > > ---
> >
Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> > >
> > <ursulanumeria@y...<mailto:ursulanumeria@y...>>
> > wrote:
> > > > Is there any chance there will be a second
run?
> > > Might
> > > > come in handy for anyone wishing to marry by
> > > ceremony
> > > > of coemptio. :)
> > > >
> > > > --- Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@c...>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > coincollectors1 <paz@s...> writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How can I obtain the Nova Roma coins?
> > > > >
> > > > > The original run of sesterci has been
> > exhausted,
> > > and
> > > > > they are all in
> > > > > circulation. Perhaps someone reading this
has
> > a
> > > > > coin that they'll be willing
> > > > > to sell you.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale,
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Marinus
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37806 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Enthusiast uses Google to reveal Roman ruins
As reported in Nature Magazine's online site at:

http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050912/full/050912-6.html

[the following text is quoted from the website]

Using satellite images from Google Maps and Google Earth, an Italian computer
programmer has stumbled upon the remains of an ancient villa. Luca Mori was
studying maps of the region around his town of Sorbolo, near Parma, when he
noticed a prominent, oval, shaded form more than 500 metres long. It was the
meander of an ancient river, visible because former watercourses absorb
different amounts of moisture from the air than their surroundings do.

His eye was caught by unusual 'rectangular shadows' nearby. Curious, he
analysed the image further, and concluded that the lines must represent a
buried structure of human origin. Eventually, he traced out what looked like
the inner courtyards of a villa.

Mori, who describes the finding on his blog, Quellí Della Bassa
<http://www.quellidellabassa.org/>, contacted archaeologists, including
experts at the National Archaeological Museum of Parma. They confirmed the
find. At first it was thought to be a Bronze Age village, but an inspection
of the site turned up ceramic pieces that indicated it was a Roman villa.

"Mori's research is interesting in its approach," says Manuela Catarsi
Dall'Aglio, an archaeologist at the National Archaeological Museum of Parma.
He says the find may be similar to a villa the museum is currently excavating
at Cannetolo di Fontanellato, which was found during the construction of a
high-speed rail network. "Only a scientific, archeological dig will tell," he
adds.

The local authorities will have to approve any archaeological digs before they
can take place.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37807 From: John Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Romanesque-ish -like Coins?
Salvete,

Along those lines of new coins, does anyone know of any affordable Roman era FAKE coins or coins used only for reenactors. When I was in London about ten years ago, I got 2 such souvenir coins from the British Museum gift shop and I still have them. I would love to have a bunch more. But if I got real ones I couldn't play with them while I read my volumes of emails...

Amabo te,

Marcvs Cornellivs Germannicvs Sapio

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37808 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: a.d. XV Kal. Oct.
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem XV Kalendas Octobris; haec dies comitialis est.

"Another measure, by no means so welcome to the patricians, was
brought forward the following year, the consuls being C. Marcius and
Cnaeus Manlius. M. Duilius and L. Menenius, tribunes of the plebs,
were the proposers of this measure, which fixed the rate of interest
at 8 1/3 per cent.; the plebs adopted it with much more eagerness than
the Poetilian Law against canvassing. In addition to the fresh wars
decided upon the previous year, the Faliscans had been guilty of two
acts of hostility; their men had fought in the ranks of the
Tarquinians, and they had refused to give up those who had fled after
their defeat to Tarquinii, when the Fetials demanded their surrender.
That campaign fell to Cn. Manlius; Marcius conducted the operations
against Privernum. This district had remained uninjured during the
long years of peace, and when Marcius led his army thither, they
loaded themselves with plunder. Its value was enhanced by the
munificence of the consul, for he appropriated none of it for the
State, and so encouraged the efforts of the private soldier to
increase his private means. The Privernates had formed a strongly
entrenched camp in front of their walls, and before attacking it
Marcius summoned his troops to assembly, and said: "If you promise me
that you will do your duty bravely in battle and are quite as ready
for fighting as for plunder, I give you now the camp and city of the
enemy." With a mighty shout they demanded the signal for battle, and
with heads erect and full of confidence they marched proudly into
line. Sex. Tullius, who has been already mentioned, was in the front,
and he called out, "See, General, how your army is fulfilling its
promise to you," and with the word he dropped his javelin and drawing
his sword charged the enemy. The whole of the front line followed him
and at the very first onset defeated the Privernates and pursued them
as far as the town, which they prepared to storm. When the scaling
ladders were actually placed against the walls the place surrendered.
A triumph was celebrated over the Privernates. Nothing worth recording
was done by the other consul, except his unprecedented action in
getting a law passed in camp by the tribes levying 5 per cent. on the
value of every slave who was manumitted. As the money raised under
this law would be a handsome addition to the exhausted treasury, the
senate confirmed it. The tribunes of the plebs, however, looking not
so much to the law as to the precedent set, made it a capital offence
for any one to convene the Assembly outside their usual place of
meeting. If it were once legalised, there was nothing, however
injurious to the people, which could not be carried through men who
were bound by the oath of military obedience. In this year C. Licinius
Stolo was impeached by M. Popilius Laenas for having violated his own
law; he and his son together occupied a thousand jugera of land, and
he had emancipated his son in order to evade the law. He was condemned
to pay a fine of 10,000 ases." - Livy, History of Rome 7.16


"I begin to sing of rich-haired Demeter, awful goddess -- of her and
her trim-ankled daughter whom Aidoneus [Hades] rapt away, given to him
by all-seeing Zeus the loud-thunderer. Apart from Demeter, lady of the
golden sword and glorious fruits, she was playing with the
deep-bosomed daughters of Oceanus and gathering flowers over a soft
meadow, roses and crocuses and beautiful violets, irises also and
hyacinths and the narcissus which Earth made to grow at the will of
Zeus and to please the Host of Many, to be a snare for the bloom-like
girl -- a marvellous, radiant flower. It was a thing of awe whether
for deathless gods or mortal men to see: from its root grew a hundred
blooms and it smelled most sweetly, so that all wide heaven above and
the whole earth and the sea's salt swell laughed for joy. And the girl
was amazed and reached out with both hands to take the lovely toy; but
the wide-pathed earth yawned there in the plain of Nysa, and the lord,
Host of Many, with his immortal horses sprang out upon her -- the Son
of Cronos, He who has many names." - Hymn to DEmeter, attributed to
Homer lines 1-18

"And rich-crowned Demeter did not refuse but straightway made fruit to
spring up from the rich lands, so that the whole wide earth was laden
with leaves and flowers. Then she went, and to the kings who deal
justice, Triptolemus and Diocles, the horse-driver, and to doughty
Eumolpus and Celeus, leader of the people, she showed the conduct of
her rites and taught them all her mysteries, to Triptolemus and
Polyxeinus and Diocles also, -- awful mysteries which no one may in
any way transgress or pry into or utter, for deep awe of the gods
checks the voice. Happy is he among men upon earth who has seen these
mysteries; but he who is uninitiate and who has no part in them, never
has lot of like good things once he is dead, down in the darkness and
gloom." - Hymn to Demeter, attributed to Homer lines 480-87


Today was the first day of the celebration of the Eleusinian
Mysteries. Eleusis (modern-day Elefsina) was a small town located
about 30km NW of Athens. It was an agricultural town, producing wheat
and barley. The Mysteries were based on a legend revolving around
Demeter. Her daughter, Persephone, was kidnapped by Hades, the god of
death and the underworld. Demeter was the goddess of life, agriculture
and fertility. She neglected her duties while searching for her
daughter; causing a dry season (summer in Greece) in which people
starved — today, we associate this with the first winter.

During this time Demeter taught the secrets of agriculture to
Triptolemus. Finally Demeter was reunited with her daughter and the
earth came back to life— the first spring. Persephone was
unfortunately unable to stay permanently in the land of the living,
because she had eaten six seeds of a pomegranate that Hades had given
her. Those that eat the food of the dead may not return. A compromise
was worked out and Persephone stayed with Hades for one third of the
year (winter, as the Greeks only recognized three seasons, skipping
autumn) and with her mother the remaining eight months. The
Eleusinian Mysteries celebrated Persephone's return, for it was also
the return of plants and of life to the earth. She had eaten the six
pomegranate seeds (symbols of lives) while in the underworld
(underground, like seeds in the winter) and her rebirth is therefore
symbolic of the rebirth of all plant life during the spring and, by
extension, all life on earth.

In the Homeric Hymn to Demeter, Celeus was one of the original priests
of Demeter, one of the first people to learn the secret rites and
mysteries of her cult. Diocles, Eumolpos, Triptolemus and Polyxeinus
were the others of the first priests. Celeus was a king whose son,
Triptolemus, learned the art of agriculture from Demeter and taught it
to the rest of Greece.

The priests purified the candidates for initiation myesis. They first
sacrificed a pig to Demeter and then purified themselves. The
procession to Eleusis began at Kerameikos (the Athenian cemetery) on
the 19th Boedromion and the people walked to Eleusis, along the Sacred
Way, swinging branches called bakchoi along the way. At a certain spot
along the way, they shouted obscenities in commemoration of Iambe (or
Baubo), an old woman who, by cracking dirty jokes, had made Demeter
smile as she mourned the loss of her daughter. The procession also
shouted "Iakch' o Iakche!", referring to Iacchus, possibly an epithet
for Dionysus, or a separate deity, son of Persephone or Demeter.

Upon reaching Eleusis (along what was called the "Sacred Way"), there
was a day of fasting in commemoration of Demeter's fasting while
searching for Persephone. The fast was broken while drinking a special
drink of barley and pennyroyal, called kykeon. Then on 20th and 21st
Boedromion, the initiates entered a great hall called Telesterion
where they were shown the sacred relics of Demeter. This was the most
secretive part of the Mysteries and those who had been initiated were
forbidden to ever speak of the events that took place in the
Telesterion. The penalty was death.

When the mystai entered the sacred precincts of the Telesterion, they
may have been required to utter a special, formulaic password, or
"synthema," to confirm their readiness to participate in the rites.
Clement of Alexandria has reported the contents of such a synthema as
follows: "I fasted; I drank the kykeon; I took from the kiste [a
cylindrical reliquary]; having done my task, I placed in the basket,
and from the basket into the kiste" (Protreptikos, II, 18).
These obscure, but suggestive words have given rise to a plethora of
imaginative interpretations; yet scholars are divided about the
reliability of Clement's testimony.

What next transpired in the ceremonies remains hidden behind veils of
piously enforced secrecy. Most scholars believe, on the basis of
testimony from Clement of Alexandria and Tertullian, that the
Mysteries comprised three main components, known as the deiknymena
("things shown"), the legomena ("things said"), and the dromena
("things done"). We have already discussed aspects of the first two
and will return to them again later. As for the dromena, these are
believed to have included a ritual reenactment of the story of Demeter
and Persephone, including the latter's abduction by Hades; Demeter's
grief; her long, desperate search throughout the world for the
departed goddess; the anguish of all living creatures as famine and
death engulfed them. Very likely the initiates gained a sense of
direct participation in Demeter's travail by searching with her and
calling for her daughter in the same hallowed precincts which,
according to tradition, actually witnessed these events. Then finally,
perhaps illuminated in a sudden blaze of torchlight, there would have
been the joyous moment of Persephone's resurrection, as she emerged
from the underworld and returned to the loving arms of her mother. The
dramatic intensity of this pageant, heightened (in all probability) by
music and chanted invocations of the gods, would surely have created
an awe-inspiring spectacle, whose memory the initiates would cherish
for the rest of their lives.


"Between falsehood and useless truth there is little difference. As
gold which he cannot spend will make no man rich, so knowledge which
he cannot apply will make no man wise." - Dr. Samuel Johnson, English
lexicographer, born on September 18, 1709


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy (http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/Livy/), Hymn to Demeter
(http://users.erols.com/nbeach/demeter.html), Eleusinian Mysteries
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37809 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
CN·SALVIVS·ASTVR·QVIRITIBVS·S·P·D

Once again, please forgive me for lumping all my replies in a single message.

M. Hortensia scripsit:

> Salve; I just want to say that yes, 'someone' is doing
> something for Iuppiter. I'm producing the first broadcast of Nova
> Roma's new radio station

Excellent!
I wish you all good luck, and I wish the new radio station a long time
on air. :-)

> I'm happy to say to any of the pontifices "how can I help you?" I have
> a great university research library at my disposal and I am here, as
> well as starting projects on my own.

We (you, me and others) had a private conversation along those lines
before the summer. Do you remember? Maybe we should pick up that
thread again...

----------------------------

A. Ambrosius Celetrus scripsit:

> Ponitfex Astur, pick one of the score of people who hold a religious
> title in NR, and accepted the obligations that go with that title, and
> have them do the job. They are the pool of "someones" from which you
> must accomplish the "somethings" that are not being done, and quit
> whining about the fact that you have accepted these obligations. If no
> one is willing to prepare a ceremony to start the Ludi Plebeii, you do
> it. If you can't or won't, resign.

I work for the benefit of Nova Roma in many different fields. I work
several hours each day, and I have been doing so for years. I dedicate
so much of my (scarce) free time to Nova Roma that I often have
problems with the people I love about it. And yet you, who are not
doing, to the best of my knowledge, anything on my behalf, feel free
to lecture me on what I should be doing and to *demand* (not request,
not ask, but demand) more effort and more dedication from me.

This is what I have to say to you: put your work where your mouth is.
You don't have to be a pontifex in order to organise the celebration
of the sacra publica according to the calendar. Lead us yourself into
a full compliance with the Gods. Don't worry about the title; if you
do the job, the associated title will eventually be assigned to you,
no matter how many members of the current Collegium Pontificum oppose
you.

You do that, and I will resign from the pontificate. After all, I am
only in this so that things are done. You do them instead of me, and
my title is yours. I will concentrate on other fronts.

And don't tell me that you don't have the time. You certainly have
time to write five or six long e-mails to this mailing list every day.
Dedicate that time to the sacra publica instead.

----------------------------

F. Galerius Aurelianus scripsit:

> There can be no stronger statement of dedication, piety, and devotion by the
> Pontificate and the Flamens than to hold the physical rites on behalf of the
> Republic and then post what was done on the ML and related religio sites.

Obviously, I agree. Who wouldn't?

> While each member of the Sacred Colleges should strive for a historically
> correct ritual properly researched and performed, we cannot always expect
> perfection which is why we offer the piaculum. It is, in my opinion, far more
> important to offer worship, honor, and sacrifice to the Gods on the appropriate
> days and festivals in the best way we can do so. We can always strive for
> improvement as we move forward with our research.

Once again, I agree. But what does this mean in practical terms?

Don't get me wrong. I know what you are trying to say. I have said it
myself before. What I also say is that, although we all agree that
things should be done, we do not have a practical plan on how to do
things. I repeat the same questions I have repeated in the past: who,
what, when and how?

Unless responsabilities have been defined more clearly, all these will
be nothing else than (and don't take it personally, Aureliane) nice
words.

----------------------------

Cn. Equitio Cato scripsit:

> Astur, amice, I believe that you, and Metellus, and actually *all* of
> the College of Pontiffs truly are interested in the welfare of the
> relationship between the Republic and the gods. I believe that there
> is a great deal of information and intelligence behind the work of the
> College, and have witnessed it to some extent on the Religio List. I
> just ask that the work that has already been done, as evidenced by the
> numerous rites that have taken place *and been posted in the Forum* in
> the past on important days, not be left to gather dust, but be
> exercized.

A good step into that direction (and I am talking off the top of my
head) would be to collect all those rituals and to present it in a
proper format. Maybe they could be uploaded to the Nova Roma web site,
to begin with.

Maybe we can cooperate in this. You gather the information, and then I
present it to the Collegium Pontificum for study. Once some (or all)
of these rites have been evaluated and approved (in a limited period
of time, I will take care of that) they can be uploaded to the web
site.

In that way, we will have made a step in the right direction. Of my
previous pronominal questions (who, what, when and how) we will begin
to answer the last one. How does that sound to you, amice?

Just one more comment...

[...]

> So while I am loathe to give up the calendar, I ask at least that the
> pontiffs make their presence known on our great festivals. They have
> done so in the past, and it is their responsibility.

Quoting myself this summer back in Rome: "What calendar?" (you should
all have seen Cato's face when I said that.) ;-)

I think that it should be the responsability of the Collegium
Pontificum to present the official calendar of religious festivities
at the beginning of the year. It is not its responsability to post a
daily message about the religious significance of each day (although
it is a commendable practice, and one I thank you for, and I also
thank those -- pontifices or not -- who have done it in the past).

S·V·B·E·E·V

CN·SALVIVS·T·F·A·NEP·OVF·ASTVR·SCRIPSIT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37810 From: M. Gladius Agricola Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Romanesque-ish -like Coins?
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, John <pilotsensei@y...> wrote:
> Salvete,
>
> Along those lines of new coins, does anyone know of any affordable
Roman era FAKE coins or coins used only for reenactors. When I was in
London about ten years ago, I got 2 such souvenir coins from the
British Museum gift shop and I still have them. I would love to have a
bunch more. But if I got real ones I couldn't play with them while I
read my volumes of emails...
>
> Amabo te,
>
> Marcvs Cornellivs Germannicvs Sapio
>



Salve!

This shop (in Rome) http://www.etrome.com/our_shop.asp has some very
nice copies of sesterii and denarii. They told me that they will be
opening an online shop soon.

optime vale

M. Gladius Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37811 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate-An Opinion
A. Ambrosius Celetrus F. Galerio Aureliano S.P.D.

First of all, Galeri, I'd like to thank you, not for weighing in on this
matter, but for performing those duties, to the best of your ability,
that you knew were yours to do when you applied for, and was accepted
as, Flamen Cerealis.

Second, I would like to apologize for the criticism I threw your way
earlier this year, when the PM set a Sementivae date incorrectly. You
did your job, and that's all that counted. I am sorry.

I'm also sorry that I didn't offer timely thanks for your Cerealia, and
Vinalia ceremonies, but my list subscription was set to "digest" at that
time. I have tried to make up for that recently, by honoring your
efforts, and of those like you such as Modia Lupa, and Moravia Aurelia.
Not that you have any need of praise from the likes of me. You all serve
your Goddesses, as best you can, with your whole heart, and without
excuses. And for that, I know you are blessed.

I sincerely pray that voicing your opinion on this matter, does not,
indeed, get you into any trouble.

Vale
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37812 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Ambrosius Celetrus C. Salvio Asturo S.P.D.

Gnaeus Salvius Astur wrote:

>
> I work for the benefit of Nova Roma in many different fields. I work

> several hours each day, and I have been doing so for years. I dedicate
>
> so much of my (scarce) free time to Nova Roma that I often have
> problems with the people I love about it. And yet you, who are not
> doing, to the best of my knowledge, anything on my behalf, feel free
> to lecture me on what I should be doing and to *demand* (not request,
> not ask, but demand) more effort and more dedication from me.

Astur, I don't know if you do what you say you do, I only know what you
don't do, and that you and your friend Cordus have infinitely many
excuses for why you don't.

> This is what I have to say to you: put your work where your mouth is.
> You don't have to be a pontifex in order to organise the celebration
> of the sacra publica according to the calendar.

Thank you for deigning to let me do your work for you. I will start by
helping Cato with the project you would like him to do in your stead.

This whole endeavor was indeed about bringing the sacred days to life.
It would have been nice if those with their self-proclaimed calling (I'm
naive that way, I tend to believe that priests are set apart from the
likes of me by the Gods) could have been shamed into fulfilling that
duty, but hey, your fiat to do your work for you, is apparently that
best that's going to happen.

If you've been following Hortensia's replies to me, you know that the
phrase, "what have *you* been doing" has been one of her primary means
of defending you. You will have also read that I have grave family
problems, as well as, like you, work. Of course, unlike you, I know what
my duties are in my job. If memory serves me, I pretty much knew what
they were even before I was hired, and certainly knew them by the end of
the first week.

Anyway, I will devote all the time that I can to this. I'm standing for
the position of scriba in the Musarum - I will withdraw from the
elections.

Tell me, Astur, will I have full access to the work the CP has
supposedly already done, or do I have to start fresh?

vale


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37813 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
A. Ambrosius Celetrus A. Apollonio Cordo s.d.

"A. Apollonius Cordus" wrote:

> The need for coordination is especially clear when we
> consider that a ritual may well need to be performed
> at noon, in a consecrated location, on a Tuesday. A
> pontifex who wants to perform this ritual

I can see why this excuse would appeal to you. There are no "Tuesdays"
in the Roman calendar. Your friend, Astur, would therefor be forever
exempt from his duties.

But he's found another means to shirk them.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37814 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: NR Coinage / NR Wedding Ceremonies (Duties of a Pontifex?) /
Salvete,

I would like to comment on the coin project. The group we are talking about is actually to my understanding only one person M. Gladius Agricola (William R. Hogue) in Japan who has been diligently working on a beautiful design. I have asked him if I can help him "clean up" the art and search for a suitable minting operation. The problem we are encountering is that his artwork is done on a program (I don't know which) that will only export as a JPEG or TIFF file. Both are unworkable other than to trace with the one that I use (Corel Draw). This is not suitable since it would mean literally starting from scratch each time we send it to each other for refinements.

I will be talking shortly to our Pontifex Maximus (Marcvs Cassivs Iulianvs) about finding a mint. I believe he had something to do with the original NR Coinage minting. He is a collector and vendor of ancient Roman coins. This project, I believe is still months away from completion. Only one side has been designed so far. After all of that is done it will undoubtedly have to go through a few rounds of approval by the Senate. So please be patient and offer your assistance if you can help solve our technical problem.

Also, on a different topic: I just wanted to let anyone who would like to get married with a Roman Wedding Ceremony in the state of Maine that I would be willing to perform the ceremony. It would be legal since I am legally entitled to do so in Maine. The question is, what do I have to do to legally be able to do so in Nova Roma's eyes? (I will even invest in a new tunic & Toga if the demand is good for such ceremonies:-) Currently I only own a red tunic since I usually only re-enact a 1st Century Legionnaire with Legio III Cyrenaica. I will speak to Marcus Cassius Julianus shortly about this as well. He lives close by. If there is anyone that can answer this question sooner than I can see him this week sometime, please do so. I would certainly be willing to join the College of Pontifexes if that is necessary. A cursory look at the Nova Roma Religio web site did not answer this question.

VIVAT NOVA ROMA

Vires et Honos et Valete,

Marcus Cassius Philippus
Miles - Legio III Cyrenaica, Legatus Regio Maine, Nova Britannia, Nova Roma
www.northerncrane.net



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37815 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Romanesque-ish -like Coins?
Salve


Go to

http://www.antiquanova.com/<http://www.antiquanova.com/>


http://warrenscoins.com/Ancient.htm<http://warrenscoins.com/Ancient.htm>

http://www.museumreproductions.co.uk/<http://www.museumreproductions.co.uk/>


The have Roman coin reproductions

vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: John<mailto:pilotsensei@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 5:26 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Romanesque-ish -like Coins?


Salvete,

Along those lines of new coins, does anyone know of any affordable Roman era FAKE coins or coins used only for reenactors. When I was in London about ten years ago, I got 2 such souvenir coins from the British Museum gift shop and I still have them. I would love to have a bunch more. But if I got real ones I couldn't play with them while I read my volumes of emails...

Amabo te,

Marcvs Cornellivs Germannicvs Sapio

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com<http://mail.yahoo.com/>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37816 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Coins
A. Apollonius M. Flavio omnibusque sal.

> That is most welcome news. I pray to the Gods there
> wont be the usual legal and the ancients didnt do it
> that way stuff.

Actually what happened was this: When the idea of
minting new coins was raised, I and others mentioned
that in order to be legal and historically correct it
would need to be done in a certain way. That much you
remember, I can tell! But what happened next is
important. In stead of going into a sulk about how
legal nit-picking and historical fundamentalism were
spoiling their nice project, the people who were
interested in producing new coins listened to the
legal and historical issues and took them on board.
The legal / historical people and the
let's-make-some-coins people got together and worked
together. And now, barring nasty surprises, we are
heading for a run of new coins which will be
historically accurate, *and* legally correct, *and*
exciting and fun, *and* will actually get made!

When I and others (most others, anyway) bring up legal
and historical issues, we're not trying to torpedo
good projects: we're trying to make them better by
ensuring they meet high standards of law and history.
Trying to meet those standards doesn't have to kill a
project; it can make it stronger, as it has done in
this case.





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37817 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Doing Another's Job
A. Ambrosius Celetrus Quiritibus S.P.D.

This whole e-mail effort, by Equitius Cato and myself, has been about
bringing some semblance of life to the public religion, here in NR.
Frankly I, at least, had hoped that the sitting religious could be
shamed into activity. Failing that, I had hoped that support could
formed for some kind of lex that would level civil sanctions on
negligent priests.

The first clearly cannot be done. Pontifex Astur, at least, cannot be
shamed into anything more than providing excuses. In an attempt to
forestall the second, he has demanded that I do his work for him.

I will try. I am NOT a priest, and have NOT sought a priesthood,
primarily because I've carefully read just what is expected of a priest
in NR, and know that I do not have the time to be one in the manner laid
out by the CP. But evidently, those are just words there anyhow. With
very few exceptions, sitting priests, sacerdotes and pontiffs don't take
their job descriptions seriously.

I will do what I can, not in the manner of Pontifex Astur, but in the
manner of the flamen Cerialis, and the sacerdotes of Diana.

I will state now, though, that is a completely unwanted assignment that
I'm taking. I SHOULD NOT have to do Ponitfex Astur's job, and attending
to my family in these last weeks of my brother-in-law's life, as well
fulfilling my loving duties as a brother and uncle afterwards, will take
absolute, inviolate precedence over this. I have not sworn an oath, as
Astur has, to serve the public rites, but I will do my absolute best to
see that Dii Immotales are honored, as Astur has not.

valete omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37818 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Doing Another's Job
Salvete Quirites, et salve Ambrosi Celetre,

Ambrosius Celetrus wrote:

> ... Failing that, I had hoped that support could
> formed for some kind of lex that would level civil sanctions on
> negligent priests.

Even suggesting legislation which might bind our pontifices is a sure
way to guarantee yourself e-mail from one or more of them advising you
of how you're going to be hit with the Blasphemy Decretum unless you
mend your wicked ways. They really love to swing that thing around like
a blunt instrument.

(Why yes, I have been the recipient of such e-mail.)

I commend you for your willingness to pick up the slack with respect to
the Religio Publica, Celetre. I look forward to reading your contributions.

Vale, et valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37819 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: NR Coinage
G. Equitius Cato M. Cassio Philippo quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Let me correct some misiformation here.

The group which has come together did so at the instigation of Gaius
Vipsanius Agrippa, Marcus Gladius Agricola, D. Claudius Aquilius
Germanicus, myself, and several others; it has been up and running
since 14 June (postridie Idus Iunius). There are 14 "members" of the
group, and many other citizens have popped in over the past three
months to voice their opinions as well. After much online discussion,
Gladius Agricola, Apollonius Cordus, Fabia Livia and myself were able
to meet during the Conventus in Rome and give some face-to-face time
regarding the project.

The project is being funded entirely by gifts from private citizens:
we have approximately $1300.00 in pledges as it stands now.

Gladius Agricola has been a font of intelligence regarding numismatics
in general and Roman coins in specific; and it is indeed he to whom
the honor of collecting, organizing, and finalizing the artwork goes.
He has been tireless and absolutely indispensible in this project.

In fact, both sides have already been designed.

Our Pontifex Maximus, who was behind the creation of the first coin,
unfortunately only spoke once and then refused to give any information
regarding the mint he used or even reply to emails regarding the
subject, for reasons which are still unknown. If you can get him to
speak, more power to you Cassius Philippus, but we do not need that
information any longer; we have already found an alternative mint.

The project is only "months away" in that we hope to be in production
before the end of the year.

I hope this clears up any misunderstandings regarding the
soon-to-be-proposed-to-the-Senate new sestertius.

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37820 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
A. Apollonius A. Ambrosio omnibusque sal.

> > The need for coordination is especially clear when
> we
> > consider that a ritual may well need to be
> performed
> > at noon, in a consecrated location, on a Tuesday.
> A
> > pontifex who wants to perform this ritual
>
> I can see why this excuse would appeal to you. There
> are no "Tuesdays"
> in the Roman calendar. Your friend, Astur, would
> therefor be forever
> exempt from his duties.

Ah, now we're even, for here you are telling me things
that I already know, just as you complained I was
doing earlier. Of course there are no Tuesdays in the
Roman calendar: this is precisely the point. Ante diem
XII kal. Oct. may require a ritual to be performed by
a pontifex. This in itself presents no problem. But it
so happens that, according to the Euro-American
calendar, ante diem XII kal. Oct. is a Tuesday, and
any pontifex wishing to perform a ritual on that day
will probably need to arrange a day off work to do it.
This is not an excuse for not doing the ritual, but it
is an obstacle which must be overcome.

You have conveniently overlooked the main point of my
message to Cato, preferring to pick up on one sentence
which you thought you could make a nice rhetorical
flourish with (though that one has misfired because
you failed to understand what I was saying). Let me
repeat the point. It is that there is a difference
between pointing out obstacles and making excuses.

Pointing out an obstacle may be a way of making an
excuse. But it is not the only ingredient. Pointing
out an obstacle is merely the first step in making an
excuse. The further necessary ingredient is that the
person who has pointed out the obstacle then uses it
to justify his inaction.

So pointing out an obstacle may be the preliminary
move in an attempt at excuse-making. But it may not
be. It may, in stead, be the preliminary move in an
attempt at overcoming the obstacle. Someone who says
"the door's locked" is not necessarily saying "the
door's locked, let's give up and leave"; he may be
saying "the door's locked, how can we solve this
problem and get into the house?".

What I am trying to say to you, and to Cato, is that I
believe Astur is trying to do the latter. I believe it
partly because I know him and I know he is anything
but defeatist (you seem, by the way, to relish
mentioning our friendship as if it in some way makes
all my comments invalid; I would have thought, on the
contrary, that it makes my comments rather more valid
than yours, since I know the man and you don't); but I
believe it also because it is fairly clear from the
words he actually wrote.

You seem to approach these words with the
pre-determined assumption that they are dishonest,
that they are exercises in excuse-mkaing cleverly (or
not so cleverly) disguised as attempts at constructive
dialogue. My habit is to assume that people mean what
they say and are basically honest until I find
evidence to the contrary. Maybe you think me naif
therefore, but it's a habit which has served me quite
well so far and enables me to maintain a reasonably
optimistic disposition which I would not wish to lose.

Now, let me invite you to imagine that you are me. You
know Astur, and you believe that he is an honest and
earnest fellow who is very good at getting things done
because he has a knack for understanding the essence
of a problem. You are also pre-disposed to assume that
what he says, and indeed what anyone else says, is
what he means. Now, go back and read his replies to
you. I think you'll find that what he says is more or
less this: "Yes, there have been failures; but it is
not as simple as saying that the pontifices should
knuckle down and do some work. We need to understand
what has been stopping them doing it before, so that
we can think of some way to overcome those obstacles.
Here is my impression of what those obstacles are."

Now, maintaining the hypothetical idea that he
actually means this and is genuinely interested in
exporing and understanding these obstacles in order to
overcome them, look at what you have written. I think
you'll find that what you appear to have been saying
is something like this: "I don't believe these
obstacles exist and I don't think you believe in them
either, you're just using them as excuses".

Next, ask yourself a question. Which approach is more
likely to encourage the pontifices to do what you
think they ought to be doing? Is it the approach where
you call the pontifices liars and layabouts, being
sure to direct particular criticism at the one or two
who bother to try to talk to you and sparing the rest
who merely keep their heads down? Or is it the
approach where you take the pontifices at their word,
discuss with them their ideas and your ideas about
what the obstacles are, and suggest ways of overcoming
them (and, by suggesting ways to overcome them, render
them ineffective as excuses if indeed that is what
they are meant to be)? I'm no expert on human
motivations, but it seems to me that the latter
approach is more likely to produce the results you
want.

Finally, let me suggest to you something you may not
have thought of before. If the latter course seems to
be more likely to produce genuine progress, and the
former approach seems likely to do nothing but worsen
the very problem you are complaining about, then
people watching this discussion may well begin to
think like this: If Celetrus wants progress, why is he
pursuing a strategy which seems unlikely to achieve
it? It could be because he's stupid, but that doesn't
seem to be the case. Perhaps it's because he's
actually not interested in progress at all, and is
more interested in having a fight.

I offer this merely so that you can understand the
chain of thought which may be going on in the minds of
some members of your audience. It has certainly passed
through my head. I'm inclined to think that actually
you are interested in real progress, and that the
reason you are so doggedly pursuing a course of action
which seems designed to produce the opposite is simply
that you are so angry with the pontifices' cumulative
inactivity over the last seven years that you are not
thinking clearly. It would be an understandable
reaction; there is plenty to be angry about. But anger
can make one do irrational and counter-productive
things, like attacking people who are actually on your
side, and like making yourself appear unreasonable and
aggressive and thus losing sympathy for your cause.
This is what I see, and I say so in the hope that it
will help you realize the harm you are doing to the
cause you are trying to champion.





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37821 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Doing Another's Job
Salve, Marine; salvete, omnes.

On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 10:14:46AM -0400, Bill Gawne wrote:
> Salvete Quirites, et salve Ambrosi Celetre,
>
> Ambrosius Celetrus wrote:
>
> > ... Failing that, I had hoped that support could
> > formed for some kind of lex that would level civil sanctions on
> > negligent priests.
>
> Even suggesting legislation which might bind our pontifices is a sure
> way to guarantee yourself e-mail from one or more of them advising you
> of how you're going to be hit with the Blasphemy Decretum unless you
> mend your wicked ways. They really love to swing that thing around like
> a blunt instrument.
>
> (Why yes, I have been the recipient of such e-mail.)

As Mark Twain commented with regard to the cross of the Legion of Honor,
"few escape that distinction". In both his case and the case of the BD,
the only reputation/honor affected is that of the grantor, not the
receiver - and of the "honor" bestowed.


Optime vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
De gustibus non est disputandum.
That is a matter of taste.
-- N/A
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37822 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Doing Another's Job
Ave Marine

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:

> Even suggesting legislation which might bind our pontifices is a sure
> way to guarantee yourself e-mail from one or more of them advising you
>
> of how you're going to be hit with the Blasphemy Decretum unless you
> mend your wicked ways.

Actually, I wasn't thinking of anything that would interfere, usurp or
bind with the CP's supposed activities. Rather, I envisioned a lex that
banned them from civil activities during periods when they were in
default of their religious duties, e.g. the current ludi have not been
offered by any of the CP in honor of Iuppiter Optimus Maximus, therefor
none of the CP should be allowed to post on this list during this
period. Something like that.

But it seems that is not the route I'll be taking. In fact, contrary to
my wishes, I am ironically being forced into the role of usurper :-)

I'll do what I can, as best I can. And you know, Equiti, just how
tenacious I can be when I have mission to accomplish: "La mission est
sacree, tu l'executes jusqu'au but, a tout prix." (5th article of the
Code of Honor of the French Foreign Legion - it seems singularly
appropriate here)

Thank you again for your concern. Now, since I don't have a job
description to work from, I guess I had better spend the rest of the day
thinking about this matter.

Vale,
Celetrus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37823 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Doing Another's Job
G. Equitius Cato Gn. Equitio Marino A. Ambrosio Celetro quiritibusque
S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

THEORETICALLY SPEAKING, I believe that this might actually be covered
by the lex Salicia Poenalis, Section V.A & B:

"A. Crimes may be committed either by actively causing an illegal
event or state of affairs or by allowing an illegal event or state of
affairs to occur through inaction.
B. A punishment due to inaction shall only be applied when the reus
had a legal duty to act and, by omitting to perform that duty, caused
a situation or created a risk to the detriment of others. An omission
with intent to create such a situation or risk shall ordinarily
receive a heavier penalty than one without such intent."

if, in fact, the Constitution can be proven to require that the
pontiffs offer public ceremoniae to the gods. The lex is not limited
to magistrates; the idea being that the Republic and its citizens
could be harmed by the inaction of the pontiffs --- i.e., endangering
the Republic and citizens with regards to the anger of the gods who
have been ignored.

It could perhaps even be applied under the lex Salicia Poenalis,
Section XXI.A:

"The definition of laesa patriae includes, but is not limited to, any
overt act by a citizen which a reasonable person would conclude to be
damaging or defamatory to the republic, its religio, or its
institutions...and/or acts which endanger the ability of the republic,
its religion, or its institutions to perform its legal functions."

If the law requires the pontiffs to perform the public rites of the
religio on behalf of the Republic:

"To have ritual responsibilities within the Religio Romana; and
general authority over the institutions, rites, rituals, and
priesthoods of the public Religio Romana." - Constitution of Nova Roma
VI.B.1.b

"We hold that a Roman Pagan may be defined as a person who actively
performs rites, rituals, and/or prayers to any or all of the gods and
goddesses of ancient Pagan Rome as the majority of their spiritual
involvement." - "Declaratio Religionis Romanae", Nova Roma

"The Collegium Pontificum consists of XV priests who serve the public
rites of the State religion and have general authority to determine
the structure and nature of both the public rites and the priesthoods
themselves. They act as the general oversight committee for the public
rites of the Religio Romana and appoint members of the various
Priesthoods. Some specific administrative duties of the Collegium
include: advising the Senate on religious matters, setting the dates
of religious festivals, organizing and assisting the Priesthood..." -
"Priests and Priesthoods", Nova Roma

and the purpose of the performance of these rites is the safety and
well-being of the Republic:

"I am quite certain that Romulus by instituting auspices, and Numa
ritual, laid the foundations of our state, which would never have been
able to be so great had not the immortal gods been placated to the
utmost extent." - Cicero, On the Nature of the Gods

then the charge of laesa patriae may apply.

Theoretically speaking.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37824 From: M. Gladius Agricola Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: NR Coinage
M. Gladius Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.

My friends A. Apollonius Cordus and G. Equitius Cato have spoken in
general correctly, even if they have spoken too kindly regarding my
contribution to the coin project. Our group includes some who have
generously offered to make funds available and some who have brought
many different kinds of expertise to the project. We have found good
solutions to the problems that we have faced and we have never had our
discussions in anything other than a civil tone. I know that there are
still questions ahead to be resolved and I am sure that they will be
solved in the same manner.


I want to say for the record that the discussions that we have had
regarding the designs have been extremely helpful. Everyone spoke
their minds in a frank and civil way and the result is a concept that
is far better than the one I had in mind at the outset.


Marcvs Flavivs Fides kindly responded to my earlier plea for help in
this forum and it is my fault entirely that what I have taken in hand
is done in a way that makes it very difficult indeed for us to
collaborate. I'm working to find a way to fix that.


In short, it has been a pleasure working on this project with fellow
citizens and pending Senate approval I anticipate that new sestertii
will be available in a few months.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
> G. Equitius Cato M. Cassio Philippo quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salve et salvete.
>
> Let me correct some misiformation here.
>
> The group which has come together did so at the instigation of Gaius
> Vipsanius Agrippa, Marcus Gladius Agricola, D. Claudius Aquilius
> Germanicus, myself, and several others; it has been up and running
> since 14 June (postridie Idus Iunius). There are 14 "members" of the
> group, and many other citizens have popped in over the past three
> months to voice their opinions as well. After much online discussion,
> Gladius Agricola, Apollonius Cordus, Fabia Livia and myself were able
> to meet during the Conventus in Rome and give some face-to-face time
> regarding the project.
>
> The project is being funded entirely by gifts from private citizens:
> we have approximately $1300.00 in pledges as it stands now.
>
> Gladius Agricola has been a font of intelligence regarding numismatics
> in general and Roman coins in specific; and it is indeed he to whom
> the honor of collecting, organizing, and finalizing the artwork goes.
> He has been tireless and absolutely indispensible in this project.
>
> In fact, both sides have already been designed.
>
> Our Pontifex Maximus, who was behind the creation of the first coin,
> unfortunately only spoke once and then refused to give any information
> regarding the mint he used or even reply to emails regarding the
> subject, for reasons which are still unknown. If you can get him to
> speak, more power to you Cassius Philippus, but we do not need that
> information any longer; we have already found an alternative mint.
>
> The project is only "months away" in that we hope to be in production
> before the end of the year.
>
> I hope this clears up any misunderstandings regarding the
> soon-to-be-proposed-to-the-Senate new sestertius.
>
> Vale et valete,
>
> Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37825 From: Ambrosius Celetrus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
Ave Corde,

"A. Apollonius Cordus" wrote:

> Ah, now we're even, for here you are telling me things
> that I already know, just as you complained I was
> doing earlier. Of course there are no Tuesdays in the
> Roman calendar: this is precisely the point.

I should have known you would take sarcasm as an excuse for another
tedious and irrelevant lecture. I'll read it tonight, with a glass of
warm milk, and will no doubt have the best night's sleep I've ever had.

Vale,
Celetrus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37826 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: The Duties of the Pontificate
A. Apollonius A. Ambrosio omnibusque sal.

> I should have known you would take sarcasm as an
> excuse for another
> tedious and irrelevant lecture. I'll read it
> tonight, with a glass of
> warm milk, and will no doubt have the best night's
> sleep I've ever had.

Enjoy! :)



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37827 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: Doing Another's Job
A. Apollonius C. Equitio omnibusque sal.

Historically the responsibility for enforcing
sanctions against pontifices and other public priests
who failed in their duties lay primarily with the
pontifex maximus, who had the power to impose fines
(appealable to the comitia) or, in extreme cases,
order the priest to abdicate his post. The proper way
to deal with pontifices who are not doing their jobs
is to petition the pontifex maximus to exercise his
disciplinary powers.

If the pontifex maximus himself is failing to do his
job by declining to discipline other public priests,
then it is he who is to be held responsible. Direct
legal sanctions against individual pontifices,
however, would be a usurpation of the prerogatives of
the pontifex maximus and would be extremely inadvisable.





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 37828 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-09-18
Subject: Re: NR Coinage / NR Wedding Ceremonies (Duties of a Pontifex?) /
A. Apollonius M. Cassio omnibusque sal.

> Also, on a different topic: I just wanted to let
> anyone who would like to get married with a Roman
> Wedding Ceremony in the state of Maine that I would
> be willing to perform the ceremony. It would be
> legal since I am legally entitled to do so in Maine.
> The question is, what do I have to do to legally be
> able to do so in Nova Roma's eyes? (I will even
> invest in a new tunic & Toga if the demand is good
> for such ceremonies:-) Currently I only own a red
> tunic since I usually only re-enact a 1st Century
> Legionnaire with Legio III Cyrenaica. I will speak
> to Marcus Cassius Julianus shortly about this as
> well. He lives close by. If there is anyone that can
> answer this question sooner than I can see him this
> week sometime, please do so. I would certainly be
> willing to join the College of Pontifexes if that is
> necessary. A cursory look at the Nova Roma Religio
> web site did not answer this question.

There are two types of Roman marriage. One is a free
marriage, which requires no type of ceremony to come
into existence: a free marriage arises as soon as two
people live together as if married. Macronational
legal marriages are also recognized as free marriages
even if the couple does not live together.

There were, however, often some festivities and
celebrations held to mark the creation of a free
marriage, even though the celebrations were legally
irrelevant. No particular official is needed for these
traditional celebrations, but no doubt you could help
people organize some celebrations along these lines.
You can find some information about such celebrations
here:

http://www.pogodesigns.com/JP/weddings/romanwed.html

Some of Catullus' poems also describe such
celebrations, with artistic licence:

http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0005&query=head%3D%2362

http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0005&query=head%3D%2363

http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0005&query=head%3D%2364


There is a rarer type of marriage which can involve a
ceremony for its legal creation; this is
manus-marriage, which places the wife in the legal
power of her husband. It should not be entered into
lightly.

Manus-marriage can be contracted in three ways. First,
by confarreatio. This can only be performed by the
pontifex maximus. Second, by coemptio. This can be
performed by a consul, praetor, or provincial
governor, but not by anyone else. You could assist,
however, as a libripens (person who holds the scales)
or a witness (five witnesses are needed). Third, by
usus, which involves no ceremony and merely requires
the couple to go for a year without being separated
for three nights.



___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com