Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Nov 12-15, 2005

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39167 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Citizenship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39168 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Citizenship?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39169 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Citizenship?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39170 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: FYI
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39171 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39172 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: IT'S ENOUGH!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39173 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: IT'S ENOUGH!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39174 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Only...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39175 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: IT'S ENOUGH!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39176 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: IT'S ENOUGH!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39177 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: prid. Id. Nov.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39178 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: IT'S ENOUGH!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39179 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: IT'S ENOUGH!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39180 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: IT'S ENOUGH!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39181 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: IT'S ENOUGH!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39182 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: ITS ENOUGH!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39183 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Citizenship?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39184 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Citizenship?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39185 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: Holy Books, Religion & God-A commentary from F. Galerius Aureli
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39186 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Holy Books, Religion & God-A commentary from F. Galerius Aureli
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39187 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Holy Books, Religion & God-A commentary from F. Galerius Aureli
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39188 From: albmd323232 Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Article in the Guardian about Rome HBO series
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39189 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: To all Marines, Past and Present
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39190 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: To all Marines, Past and Present
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39191 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Citizenship?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39192 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: To all Marines, Past and Present
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39193 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Id. Nov.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39194 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: To the Veterans
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39195 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: New NR Flags
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39196 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Calenders
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39197 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Calenders
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39198 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII - QUIZ - DAY 3 - Answers
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39199 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII - QUIZ - DAY 3 - Ranking
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39200 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: New NR Flags, distribution of coins
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39201 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Calenders
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39202 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII - QUIZ - DAY 4 - Architecture
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39203 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Calenders
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39204 From: vespasian72001 Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Calenders
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39205 From: vespasian72001 Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Toga query
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39206 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: New NR Flags, distribution of coins
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39207 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Toga query
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39208 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: New NR Flags, distribution of coins
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39209 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Toga query
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39210 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Holiday Purchases from Harpax
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39211 From: David Santo Orcero Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39212 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Calenders
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39213 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39214 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39215 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39216 From: David Santo Orcero Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39217 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: IT'S ENOUGH!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39218 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: ITS ENOUGH!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39219 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Holy Books, Religion & God-A commentary from F. Galerius Aureli
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39220 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39221 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39222 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39223 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39224 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Calenders
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39225 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Calenders
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39226 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39227 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39228 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39229 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39230 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Tenney Frank
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39231 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39232 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39233 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39234 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39235 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39236 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39237 From: Caius Curius Saturninus Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: about calendars, I could do them if there is interest
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39238 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: about calendars, I could do them if there is interest
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39239 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: about calendars, I could do them if there is interest
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39240 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39241 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39242 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII - QUIZ - DAY 4 - Answers
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39243 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII - QUIZ - DAY 5 - Ranking
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39244 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII - QUIZ - DAY 5 - Various
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39245 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39246 From: lucius_fidelius Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39247 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39248 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: LUDI CIRCENSIS Subscribe to Chariot Races
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39249 From: David Santo Orcero Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39251 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: post. Id. Nov.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39252 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39253 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Druids (was "Salve Omnes")
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39254 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: LUDI CIRCENSIS Subscribe to Chariot Races
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39255 From: David Santo Orcero Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Druids (was "Salve Omnes")
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39256 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Diana enters Latina Harmonia in the Chariot races
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39257 From: Caius Curius Saturninus Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2181
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39258 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: ITS ENOUGH!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39259 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39260 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: The Tenney Frank Question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39261 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: The Tenney Frank Question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39262 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Druids (was "Salve Omnes")
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39263 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: ITS ENOUGH!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39264 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: The Tenney Frank Question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39265 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: The Tenney Frank Question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39266 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: about calendars, I could do them if there is interest
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39267 From: Richard Sciarappa Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: about calendars, I could do them if there is interest
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39268 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: about calendars, I could do them if there is interest
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39269 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: E. Pluribus Unum no longer- in Queens at least.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39270 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: The Tenney Frank Question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39271 From: Maior Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: about calendars, I could do them if there is interest
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39272 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Druids, Christians, Culdees
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39273 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2181
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39274 From: Paolo Eutimo Cristiano Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: about calendars, I could do them if there is interest
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39275 From: Nabarz Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: YULE Celebrations: A Mithraic Ritual to the Sun
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39276 From: Paolo Eutimo Cristiano Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39277 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39278 From: lucius_fidelius Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39279 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39280 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39281 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39282 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39283 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Why M.F.Fides keeps comparing todays Western World W/ ROMA Anti
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39284 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Libatio Iovi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39285 From: Maior Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Libatio Iovi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39286 From: Maior Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Fortuna's temple
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39287 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: This is Latin, isnt it?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39288 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39289 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: This is Latin, isnt it?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39290 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39291 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: This is Latin, isnt it?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39292 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: This is Latin, isnt it?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39293 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39294 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: This is Latin, isnt it?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39295 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39296 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39297 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: This is Latin, isn't it?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39298 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39299 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39300 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39301 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39302 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39303 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39304 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39305 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: This is Latin, isnt it?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39306 From: David Santo Orcero Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39307 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: a.d. XVII Kal. Dec.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39308 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: This is Latin, isnt it?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39309 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII - QUIZ - DAY 5 - Answers
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39310 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII - QUIZ - FINAL RANKING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39311 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: LUDI PLEBEII - QUIZ - FINAL RANKING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39312 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39313 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39314 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: This is Latin, isnt it?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39315 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: This is Latin, isnt it?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39316 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39317 From: lucius_fidelius Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39318 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39319 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39320 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39321 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39322 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39323 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39324 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39325 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39326 From: David Kling Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39327 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39328 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39329 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39330 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Not alone.But Im willing to speak as others are afraid.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39331 From: lucius_fidelius Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39332 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39333 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39334 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39335 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Not alone.But Im willing to speak as others are afraid.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39336 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39337 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39338 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39339 From: David Santo Orcero Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39340 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39341 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39342 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39343 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Certamen Petronianum



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39167 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Citizenship
Salve Romans

Cordus says in part

"The penalty for disregarding provocatio was extremely serious, and A.
H. M. Jones in "The Criminal Courts of the Roman
Republic" produces some evidence that both provincial
officials and military officers during the republic
were extremely reluctant to do anything which might
get them accused on doing this."

TGP How interesting that even Roman military officers
understood that no one should place themselves between
a Roman Citizen invoking provocatio and his day in court.


AAC "In many cases it seems that the word "provoco"
was enough to make the relevant officials drop the
whole case like a hot potato and send it straight to Rome.
And understandably so, if one recalls Cicero's blistering
attack on Verres for the latter's disregard of
provocatio as governor of Sicily."

TGP Oh how the times have changed :(


Vale


Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
"Nova Roma, an education in Classics and a Classical Education"






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39168 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Citizenship?
In a message dated 11/12/2005 6:46:49 AM Pacific Standard Time,
praefectus2324@... writes:
Isnt it true that the toga was not as widely used as
we think ESPECIALLY during later imperial times?
Most likely. But I concentrate on the republican period. That has the most
interest
for me in NR.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39169 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Citizenship?
In a message dated 11/11/2005 8:01:55 PM Pacific Standard Time,
glcrassus@... writes:
With regard to proving Roman citizenship, were not Roman legionaries branded
or 'marked' in some permanent way, or is this an invention of Hollywood? This
in itself, if true, could concievable prove citizenship- assuming the man in
question had not been stripped of it for some reason.
Veg. in "Epitome" tells us the recruit was so marked. But remember by the
5th Cent. CE everybody in the Empire was a citizen, unless you were a mercenary
fighting in the Roman army.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39170 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: FYI
With the current discussion on Parthia I thought this might be of some
interest.
In Moscow, Professor Vera Sergeevna Rastorgueva
93 years old has died.
Prof. Rastorgueva was a world-known specialist in various modern and extinct
Western Iranian languages, her expertise was in Tajik dialectology.

Her last work was the Western Iranian part of the
"Etymological dictionary of Iranian Languages" (Eastern Iranian
material collected by Dzhoj Iosifovna Edel'man), with the first
two volumes are already published and a third in the works.

Prof. Rastorgueva is also the author (together with E.K.
Molcanova) of "Parfjanskij jazyk" Osnovy iranskogo
jazykoznanija: Sredneirankie jazyki, Moscow 1981, pp. 147-232)
which is the only grammar of the Parthian language, apart
from an article by Werner Sundermann in Compendium Linguarum
Iranicarum.

A sad loss, but much of what we know about Parthia is due to this
amazing women.
Hopefully, Molcanva will continue with the work.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39171 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
It's difficult to say that Hinduism 'is' anything, other than the Eastern
continuation of the Olympians with a lot of additions. The earthly teaching in
the Bhagavadgita is 'do your duty', which just happens to be fighting an
enormous war whose outcome makes no difference at all. The spiritual is that
total devotion and focus away from this life prevent an eternity of lives. I
recall somebody saying something that makes a lot of sense, that religions
preach the opposite of the prevailing culture. Obviously, they want people to
change. So a religion as apparantly pacific as Hinduism likes to present itself
implies an underlying violent culture. I don't think the Baha'i have had any
religious wars. There's not enough of them and they haven't been around for long
enough!
Caesariensis

> >
> > ATS: Indeed they do‹and not only as warfare, but as
> > religiously-inspired murder. A Punjabi friend and her sister, who were
> > children at the time, were the sole survivors of their (Hindu) family¹s
> > extermination at the hands of the Muslims. Even an infant brother was
> > killed; presumably the girls were spared because in that society
> > preadolescent females weren¹t worth the trouble of killing them. The
> > murderers must have assumed that they would die anyway. This sort of thing
> > occurs with lamentable frequency in the Indian subcontinent; someone
> > provokes a reaction, and it occurs with horrifying consequences. Hinduism
> > may indeed be a passive religion, so passive that the Mahatma evidently had
> > to exert some effort to get his countrymen ready to fight for independence,
> > but there is no lack of inclination to fight when a sacred cow is
> > slaughtered or a pig is introduced into a mosque or what have you.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > QSP
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > ATS
> >


"The truth which makes men free is for the most part the truth which men
prefer not to hear" - Herbert Agar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39172 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: IT'S ENOUGH!
The aggression was from her to me regarding one line refering to possible
political influence in a long tract comapring the present hubbub about Islam
with the Roman fear of Christians. There was no 'anti-Semitism', no attack on
her until I told her her choice to take offense and so silence the intended
discussion was mistaken. I don't know what you mean about a 'primitive'
interpretation of history. I get mine from historians, not from maniacs
centuries after the events imagining supernatural indpiration never found before
in religious works. I notice ny extensive quote from Rabbi Berger is missing.
Was his opposition to Israel also 'anti-Semitic'?

> Salvete omnes,
>
> Will some authority put an end to the insults and verbal aggressions from
> this character, Caesariensis, against Marca Hortensia Maior and all of us
> who reject his vile antisemitism and primitive interpretation of history?
>
> Valete,
>
> M•IVL•SEVERVS
> SCRIBA•CENSORIS•GEM
> MVSÆVS•COLLEGII•ERATOVS•SODALITATIS•MVSARVM
> SOCIVS•CHORI•MVSARVM
> PROVINCIA•MEXICO•NOVƕROMƕSPQR
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
> This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.
>
> Powered by Outblaze
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
>
> Ancient history
>
> Fall of the roman empire
>
> The fall of the roman empire
>
> Roman empire
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
</blockquote></BODY>

"The truth which makes men free is for the most part the truth which men
prefer not to hear" - Herbert Agar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39173 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: IT'S ENOUGH!
Salve,

Yes, I agree that your posts were not anti-semitic.

Vale,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia

----- Original Message -----
From: <me-in-@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] IT'S ENOUGH!


The aggression was from her to me regarding one line refering to possible
political influence in a long tract comapring the present hubbub about Islam
with the Roman fear of Christians. There was no 'anti-Semitism', no attack
on
her until I told her her choice to take offense and so silence the intended
discussion was mistaken. I don't know what you mean about a 'primitive'
interpretation of history. I get mine from historians, not from maniacs
centuries after the events imagining supernatural indpiration never found
before
in religious works. I notice ny extensive quote from Rabbi Berger is
missing.
Was his opposition to Israel also 'anti-Semitic'?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39174 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Only...
...2 hours and a half left to answers the questions for day 3 of the
ludi's quiz!

Hurry up!

Valete,

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis Iterum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39175 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: IT'S ENOUGH!
ave Severe,

just because you are asking: there is an authority and its name is
the Praetorship. But we intervene according to the law, most of the
time in the background. Don't worry, we're alwasy cheking this Forum.

M IVL PERVSIANVS
Praetor

Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M•IVL•SEVERVS <marcusiuliusseverus@l...>
wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Will some authority put an end to the insults and verbal
aggressions from
> this character, Caesariensis, against Marca Hortensia Maior and
all of us
> who reject his vile antisemitism and primitive interpretation of
history?
>
> Valete,
>
> M•IVL•SEVERVS
> SCRIBA•CENSORIS•GEM
> MVSÆVS•COLLEGII•ERATOVS•SODALITATIS•MVSARVM
> SOCIVS•CHORI•MVSARVM
> PROVINCIA•MEXICO•NOVƕROMƕSPQR
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
> This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.
>
> Powered by Outblaze
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39176 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: IT'S ENOUGH!
Salve Audens Sempronia (you have oo many names for me to sure which are the
'polite' ones)
Good. So, as I recall, one of these threads concerned how Rome would react to
the kind of situation in France but also linked that with imagined Muslim
insurgency. Well we know how Rome reacted: it's in all the martyrologies. And we
know the outcome of heavy-handedness was the opposite of the intention.

What we don't know is how far the identification was as mistaken as so far this
one is (though no doubt it will not take long for some enterprising
rabble-rouser to portray this as specific attack on Muslims rather than the fact
that most of these poorer migrants happen to be Muslim) or how far were violent
groups going under the name of Christianity brought the whole thing into
disrepute. We do have records of such groups and some were later declared
heretical. However, it was in the later church's interest to claim as many
martyrs as possible without going too deeply into whether they actually
'belonged' at all or might even have been similar semi-Jewish sects like the
Mandeans and the one ascribed to Simon Magus. We know from Irenaeus that there
were some very peculiar sects grouped as 'Christian', some possibly just plain
slander since their activities resemble those attributed to black witches and
Satanists to the present time.
Caesariensis

> Salve,
>
> Yes, I agree that your posts were not anti-semitic.
>
> Vale,
>
> Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia
>

"God created man and man created God. So is it in the world. Men make
gods and they worship their creations. If would be fitting for the gods to
worship men" - Gospel of Thomas, Logion 85:1-4
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39177 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: prid. Id. Nov.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est pridie Idus Novembris; haec dies comitialis est.

"Nymphius at the same time approached the Samnite praetor and
persuaded him, now that the whole of the Roman fighting force was
either round Palaeopolis or engaged in Samnium, to allow him to sail
round with the fleet to the Roman seaboard and ravage not only the
coastal districts but even the country close to the city. But to
ensure secrecy he pointed out that it would be necessary to start by
night, and that the ships should be at once launched. To expedite
matters the whole of the Samnite troops, with the exception of those
who were mounting guard in the city, were sent down to the shore. Here
they were so crowded as to impede one another's movements and the
confusion was heightened by the darkness and the contradictory orders
which Nymphius was giving in order to gain time. Meantime Charilaus
had been admitted by his confederates into the city. When the Romans
had completely occupied the highest parts of the city, he ordered them
to raise a shout, on which the Greeks, acting on the instructions of
their leaders kept quiet. The Nolans escaped at the other end of the
city and took the road to Nola. The Samnites, shut out as they were
from the city, had less difficulty in getting away, but when once out
of danger they found themselves in a much more sorry flight. They had
no arms, there was nothing they possessed which was not left behind
with the enemy; they returned home stripped and destitute, an object
of derision not only to foreigners but even to their own countrymen. I
am quite aware that there is another view of this transaction,
according to which it was the Samnites who surrendered, but in the
above account I have followed the authorities whom I consider most
worthy of credit. Neapolis became subsequently the chief seat of the
Greek population, and the fact of a treaty being made with that city
renders it all the more probable that the re-establishment of friendly
relations was due to them. As it was generally believed that the enemy
had been forced by the siege to come to terms, a triumph was decreed
to Publilius. Two circumstances happened in connection with his
consulship which had never happened before-a prolongation of command
and a triumph after he had laid down his command." - Livy, History of
Rome 8.26


"O Jupiter Capitolinus, to You I pray, I entreat You, who the Roman
people have named Optimus after Your kindness and Maximus after Your
great power. And to You, O Juno Regina, guardian of the City of Rome.
O Minerva, You have always come to my aid with Your counsels, witness
to the existence of my works; And most especially to You, Penates, who
most of all has called me back, gods of my fathers and my family,
recalling me for the sake of your stations; And You who preside over
the City of Rome and the Republic, You I call to witness, You from
whose temple precincts and shrines did I repel the heinous and
destructive flames of impious duplicity; You also, Mother Vesta, I
pray to You, whose most chaste Vestales I have defended against
pillage and desecration by demented men; for their eternal flame I
could not allow to pass, extinguished in the blood of citizens, or
Your pure flame be intermingled with a conflagration sweeping the
entire city." - Cicero, De Domo sua ad Pontifices 144

"O Jupiter, it was through Your omen that I was led while I laid here
upon the Palatine Hill, to establish the very first foundations of the
city of Rome. Already the Arx, that fortress wickedly bought, is
seized by the Sabines, from whence they, with sword in hand, now
advance across the valley against us. But if You, Father of the Gods
and of men, hold back our enemies, at least from this spot, delivering
the Romans from their terror, and stay their shameful retreat, then
this I vow to You, Jupiter Stator, that a holy precinct and shrine
will be built in Your honor as a memorial to remind our descendents of
how once the city of Rome was saved by Your aid." - Livy, History of
Rome 1.12

Today begins a great three-day-long festival to Iuppiter, around which
the Ludi Plebii were celebrated. Iuppiter is the supreme god, also
called Iove. Originally a sky deity associated with rain and
agriculture, he developed into the great father god, prime protector
of the state, concerned, like the Greek Zeus (with whom he is
identified), with all aspects of life. At his temple on the Capitol,
triumphant generals honored him with their spoils and magistrates paid
homage to him with sacrifices. Iuppiter was the son of Saturn and Ops
and the brother and husband of Iuno. Some of his titles are:

1. Iuppiter Caelestis ("heavenly")
2. Iuppiter Fulgurator ("of the lightning")
3. Iuppiter Latarius ("God of Latium")
4. Iuppiter Lucetius ("of the light")
5. Iuppiter Pluvius ("sender of rain")
6. Iuppiter Stator ("who stands", from stare meaning "standing")
7. Iupiter Terminus or Jupiter Terminalus (defender of boundaries)
8. Iuppiter Tonans ("thunderer")
9. Iuppiter Victor (leading the Roman armies to victory)
10. Iuppiter Summanus (sender of nocturnal thunder)
11. Iuppiter Feretrius ("who carries away [the spoils of war]")

The largest temple in Rome was that of Iuppiter Optimus Maximus on the
Capitoline Hill. Here he was worshipped alongside Iuno and Minerva,
forming with them the Capitoline Triad. Temples to Iuppiter Optimus
Maximus or the Capitoline Triad as a whole were commonly built by the
Romans at the center of new cities in their colonies.


Valete bene!

Cato




SOURCES

Livy (http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/Liv2His.html),
Iuppiter (http://www.answers.com/topic/jupiter-god) and
(http://www.comfychair.org/~cmbell/myth/myth.html) and
(http://www.bartleby.com/65/ju/Jupiter.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39178 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: IT'S ENOUGH!
HAHAHAHAHA!!


----- Original Message -----
From: <me-in-@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] IT'S ENOUGH!


> Salve Audens Sempronia (you have oo many names for me to sure which are
> the
> 'polite' ones)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39179 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: IT'S ENOUGH!
Or: Mua ha ha...Mua ha ha ha ha ;-)
----- Original Message -----
From: annia@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] IT'S ENOUGH!


HAHAHAHAHA!!


----- Original Message -----
From: <me-in-@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] IT'S ENOUGH!


> Salve Audens Sempronia (you have oo many names for me to sure which are
> the
> 'polite' ones)




SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
Roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.0/167 - Release Date: 11/11/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39180 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: IT'S ENOUGH!
Well, I should point out that I only chose 3 of the names.

Vale,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia


----- Original Message -----
From: "Sensei Phil Perez" <senseiphil@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] IT'S ENOUGH!


> Or: Mua ha ha...Mua ha ha ha ha ;-)
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: annia@...
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 5:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] IT'S ENOUGH!
>
>
> HAHAHAHAHA!!
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <me-in-@...>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 5:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] IT'S ENOUGH!
>
>
> > Salve Audens Sempronia (you have oo many names for me to sure which are
> > the
> > 'polite' ones)
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of
> the roman empire
> Roman empire
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.0/167 - Release Date:
> 11/11/2005
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39181 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: IT'S ENOUGH!
Ave, Praetor Perusianus,

Thank you for your message. It's good to know that you intervene
according to the law.

M•IVL•SEVERVS
SCRIBA•CENSORIS•GEM
MVSÆVS•COLLEGII•ERATOVS•SODALITATIS•MVSARVM
SOCIVS•CHORI•MVSARVM
PROVINCIA•MEXICO•NOVƕROMƕSPQR

--
_______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.

Powered by Outblaze


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39182 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: ITS ENOUGH!
The problem is society is gosh-darn sensitive these
days.If I say call a spade,a spade. someone will read
into it,gasp & shout How Dare You!! Its silly.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <annia@...>
wrote:
> Salve,
>
> Yes, I agree that your posts were not anti-semitic.
>
> Vale,
>
> Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <me-in-@...>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 1:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] IT'S ENOUGH!
>
>
> The aggression was from her to me regarding one line
refering to possible
> political influence in a long tract comapring the
present hubbub about Islam
> with the Roman fear of Christians. There was no
'anti-Semitism', no attack
> on
> her until I told her her choice to take offense and
so silence the intended
> discussion was mistaken. I don't know what you mean
about a 'primitive'
> interpretation of history. I get mine from
historians, not from maniacs
> centuries after the events imagining supernatural
indpiration never found
> before
> in religious works. I notice ny extensive quote from
Rabbi Berger is
> missing.
> Was his opposition to Israel also 'anti-Semitic'?
>
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39183 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Citizenship?
Doesnt the ACLU handle floggings and the like? Or is
that Amnesty International?
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mjk@...>
wrote:
> Salvete omnes,
>
> In Roman times did each citizen within the city of
Rome and abroad in
> the provinces have to carry some sort of document to
prove he was a
> citizen? How did provincial civil sevants verify
this, especially when
> they caught some sort of brigand who would want to
cry, "Civis Romanus
> sum." to avoid flogging or going to the cross?
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39184 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Citizenship?
No but perhaps they like to watch! Last I heard in Malayisia and
Singapore there were concerns about some foreign drug trafficers
schedualed to dance the New Gate polka.
Ah well, I sometimes like to watch demonstations and riots whilst
nursing a cold beer or spiced wine... mind you at a safe distance,
betting my sestaries on the outcomes. I must have some of that old
Roman spirit in me after all these centuries.

QSP


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
>
> Doesnt the ACLU handle floggings and the like? Or is
> that Amnesty International?
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mjk@d...>
> wrote:
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > In Roman times did each citizen within the city of
> Rome and abroad in
> > the provinces have to carry some sort of document to
> prove he was a
> > citizen? How did provincial civil sevants verify
> this, especially when
> > they caught some sort of brigand who would want to
> cry, "Civis Romanus
> > sum." to avoid flogging or going to the cross?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39185 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2005-11-12
Subject: Re: Holy Books, Religion & God-A commentary from F. Galerius Aureli
Valetudo quod fortuna,

On 11/10/05, Sensei Phil Perez <senseiphil@...> wrote:
> Salvete,
>
> Lets not forget who originally said:
>
> "love God with all your heart and treat your neighbor as you would be treated"
>
> Vires et honos,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus

Hammurabi?

=========================================
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poet

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/


http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/

--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39186 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Holy Books, Religion & God-A commentary from F. Galerius Aureli
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
<wend1066@g...> wrote:
>
> Valetudo quod fortuna,
>
> On 11/10/05, Sensei Phil Perez <senseiphil@n...> wrote:
> > Salvete,
> >
> > Lets not forget who originally said:
> >
> > "love God with all your heart and treat your neighbor as you would
be treated"
> >
> > Vires et honos,
> > Marcus Cassius Philippus
>
> Hammurabi?
>

I don't know about that, but there is rent control there:

"121: If any one store corn in another man's house he shall pay him
storage at the rate of one gur for every five ka of corn per year. "

I'm sure the storage rate for five ka of corn is higher than one gur,
but by how much I cannot say. Does anyone have the gur/yen exchange
rate? I may need to store five ka of corn for about a year.

M. Lucr. Agricola


> =========================================
> In amicitia quod fides -
> Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor
>
> Religio Septentrionalis - Poet
>
> Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
>
>
> http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
>
> --
> May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39187 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Holy Books, Religion & God-A commentary from F. Galerius Aureli
I thought CHAKA KHAN said that. or was it pre Bobby
Brown- Whitney?
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <wm_hogue@...>
wrote:
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, S Ullerius Venator
Piperbarbus
> <wend1066@g...> wrote:
> >
> > Valetudo quod fortuna,
> >
> > On 11/10/05, Sensei Phil Perez <senseiphil@n...>
wrote:
> > > Salvete,
> > >
> > > Lets not forget who originally said:
> > >
> > > "love God with all your heart and treat your
neighbor as you would
> be treated"
> > >
> > > Vires et honos,
> > > Marcus Cassius Philippus
> >
> > Hammurabi?
> >
>
> I don't know about that, but there is rent control
there:
>
> "121: If any one store corn in another man's house
he shall pay him
> storage at the rate of one gur for every five ka of
corn per year. "
>
> I'm sure the storage rate for five ka of corn is
higher than one gur,
> but by how much I cannot say. Does anyone have the
gur/yen exchange
> rate? I may need to store five ka of corn for about
a year.
>
> M. Lucr. Agricola
>
>
> > ========================
> =================
> > In amicitia quod fides -
> > Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> > Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor
> >
> > Religio Septentrionalis - Poet
> >
> > Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
> >
> >
> > http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> > http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> >
> > --
> > May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> > May the Spirits of our family lines nod in
approval.
> > May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
> >
>
>
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39188 From: albmd323232 Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Article in the Guardian about Rome HBO series
Salvete,

Professor Mary Beard, a previous ask the expert participant, recently
wrote a less than flattering critique on the way Rome is presented in
the media:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1604024,00.html

I highly enjoy the Rome HBO series, which I watch once I was told where
they were located on the internet. Anyways, is it acceptable that the
show panders to some stereotypes and has some historical inaccuracies,
while still taking us to that time period and be interesting for all
sorts of viewers? While not being an actual documentary, it has
displayed aspects of roman life and culture that arent in other movies
or shows. Im waiting more in anticipation for next season, the not
often depicted showdown between octavian and mark antony, than another
representation of caesars assassination.

Valete,
D. Claudius Aquilius Germanicus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39189 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: To all Marines, Past and Present
Oorah, Rangers, too!

Hmmm that would be Roger's Rangers, yes? Correct me if I'm wrong, but
weren't they formed as part of the British Army during the French and
Indian War? Of course, that doesn't diminish their prestige or
accomplishments one bit- it can only add to their legacy of bravery and
battlefied achievements.

BTW- I was in the Army, too, following my enlistment in the Marine
Corps. Chemical Warfare Branch, 1985-92, 54B NBC Specialist, Rank of
Sergeant. Ft. McClellan, Ft. Lewis, Fulda-Germany, and Ft. Polk.

OORAH VETS EVERYWHERE

G Licinius Crassus


raymond fuentes wrote:

> May I add that the Army Rangers were around BEFORE any other branch of
> service? Happy belated Veterans day, HOOAH! (The Army's always left
> out, LOL_
>
> Gaius Licinius Crassus <glcrassus@...> wrote:Salve omnes,
>
> I would add a big "Oorah!" to all brother Marines out there, on this
> most excellent day.
>
> Corporal, USMC 1981-84, 0811 Field Artillery
> P.I., Lejeune, and Okinawa
>
> Semper Fi, Marines!
>
> G Licinius Crassus
>
> Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:
>
> > Salvete omnes, et salve Cato,
> >
> > gaiusequitiuscato wrote:
> >
> > > Hodie est ante diem IV Idus Novembris; haec dies comitialis est.
> >
> > And for the sake of completeness I will add that on this day in 1775
> > (CE) the 2nd Continental Congress of the United Colonies of North
> > America resolved that two battalions of Marines should be raised for
> > service ashore and afloat. On this day US Marines everywhere celebrate
> > the founding of our Corps.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > -- Marinus
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
> >
> > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
> >
> > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
> Roman empire
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39190 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: To all Marines, Past and Present
Salvete omnes,

Yes the Roger Rangers were formed during the French Indian Wars.
There is a good movie with Spencer Tracy and Robert Young I have in
my film library called "North West Passage" which was quite advanced
for its time showing the horror and atrocities of those times.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Licinius Crassus
<glcrassus@b...> wrote:
>
> Oorah, Rangers, too!
>
> Hmmm that would be Roger's Rangers, yes? Correct me if I'm wrong,
but
> weren't they formed as part of the British Army during the French
and
> Indian War? Of course, that doesn't diminish their prestige or
> accomplishments one bit- it can only add to their legacy of bravery
and
> battlefied achievements.
>
> BTW- I was in the Army, too, following my enlistment in the Marine
> Corps. Chemical Warfare Branch, 1985-92, 54B NBC Specialist, Rank
of
> Sergeant. Ft. McClellan, Ft. Lewis, Fulda-Germany, and Ft. Polk.
>
> OORAH VETS EVERYWHERE
>
> G Licinius Crassus
>
>
> raymond fuentes wrote:
>
> > May I add that the Army Rangers were around BEFORE any other
branch of
> > service? Happy belated Veterans day, HOOAH! (The Army's always
left
> > out, LOL_
> >
> > Gaius Licinius Crassus <glcrassus@b...> wrote:Salve omnes,
> >
> > I would add a big "Oorah!" to all brother Marines out there, on
this
> > most excellent day.
> >
> > Corporal, USMC 1981-84, 0811 Field Artillery
> > P.I., Lejeune, and Okinawa
> >
> > Semper Fi, Marines!
> >
> > G Licinius Crassus
> >
> > Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:
> >
> > > Salvete omnes, et salve Cato,
> > >
> > > gaiusequitiuscato wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hodie est ante diem IV Idus Novembris; haec dies comitialis
est.
> > >
> > > And for the sake of completeness I will add that on this day in
1775
> > > (CE) the 2nd Continental Congress of the United Colonies of
North
> > > America resolved that two battalions of Marines should be
raised for
> > > service ashore and afloat. On this day US Marines everywhere
celebrate
> > > the founding of our Corps.
> > >
> > > Valete,
> > >
> > > -- Marinus
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
--------
> > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > >
> > > * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
> > >
> > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?
subject=Unsubscribe>
> > >
> > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of
> > > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> > >
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
--------
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> > Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman
empire
> > Roman empire
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> >
> > Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > S P Q R
> >
> > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> >
> > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > Roman Citizen
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
> >
> > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?
subject=Unsubscribe>
> >
> > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
------
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39191 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Citizenship?
Perhaps I could send them my handmade reproduction of an old-school
British Navy cat, huh?

GLC

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) wrote:

> No but perhaps they like to watch! Last I heard in Malayisia and
> Singapore there were concerns about some foreign drug trafficers
> schedualed to dance the New Gate polka.
> Ah well, I sometimes like to watch demonstations and riots whilst
> nursing a cold beer or spiced wine... mind you at a safe distance,
> betting my sestaries on the outcomes. I must have some of that old
> Roman spirit in me after all these centuries.
>
> QSP
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
> <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> >
> > Doesnt the ACLU handle floggings and the like? Or is
> > that Amnesty International?
> > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mjk@d...>
> > wrote:
> > > Salvete omnes,
> > >
> > > In Roman times did each citizen within the city of
> > Rome and abroad in
> > > the provinces have to carry some sort of document to
> > prove he was a
> > > citizen? How did provincial civil sevants verify
> > this, especially when
> > > they caught some sort of brigand who would want to
> > cry, "Civis Romanus
> > > sum." to avoid flogging or going to the cross?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > S P Q R
> >
> > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> >
> > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > Roman Citizen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Ancient history
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ>
> Fall of the roman empire
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA>
> The fall of the roman empire
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ>
>
> Roman empire
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39192 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: To all Marines, Past and Present
Salve Gai Licini,

Here is a brief but interesting synopsis of this RR unit:

http://www.rogersrangers.org/rogers/

Regards,

QSP

> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Licinius Crassus
> <glcrassus@b...> wrote:
> >
> > Oorah, Rangers, too!
> >
> > Hmmm that would be Roger's Rangers, yes? Correct me if I'm
wrong,
> but
> > weren't they formed as part of the British Army during the
French
> and
> > Indian War? Of course, that doesn't diminish their prestige or
> > accomplishments one bit- it can only add to their legacy of
bravery
> and
> > battlefied achievements.
> >
> > BTW- I was in the Army, too, following my enlistment in the
Marine
> > Corps. Chemical Warfare Branch, 1985-92, 54B NBC Specialist,
Rank
> of
> > Sergeant. Ft. McClellan, Ft. Lewis, Fulda-Germany, and Ft. Polk.
> >
> > OORAH VETS EVERYWHERE
> >
> > G Licinius Crassus
> >
> >
> > raymond fuentes wrote:
> >
> > > May I add that the Army Rangers were around BEFORE any other
> branch of
> > > service? Happy belated Veterans day, HOOAH! (The Army's always
> left
> > > out, LOL_
> > >
> > > Gaius Licinius Crassus <glcrassus@b...> wrote:Salve omnes,
> > >
> > > I would add a big "Oorah!" to all brother Marines out there,
on
> this
> > > most excellent day.
> > >
> > > Corporal, USMC 1981-84, 0811 Field Artillery
> > > P.I., Lejeune, and Okinawa
> > >
> > > Semper Fi, Marines!
> > >
> > > G Licinius Crassus
> > >
> > > Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:
> > >
> > > > Salvete omnes, et salve Cato,
> > > >
> > > > gaiusequitiuscato wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hodie est ante diem IV Idus Novembris; haec dies
comitialis
> est.
> > > >
> > > > And for the sake of completeness I will add that on this day
in
> 1775
> > > > (CE) the 2nd Continental Congress of the United Colonies of
> North
> > > > America resolved that two battalions of Marines should be
> raised for
> > > > service ashore and afloat. On this day US Marines
everywhere
> celebrate
> > > > the founding of our Corps.
> > > >
> > > > Valete,
> > > >
> > > > -- Marinus
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------
---
> --------
> > > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > > >
> > > > * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> > > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
> > > >
> > > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > > <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?
> subject=Unsubscribe>
> > > >
> > > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms
> of
> > > > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------
---
> --------
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > SPONSORED LINKS
> > > Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman
> empire
> > > Roman empire
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------
> > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > >
> > >
> > > Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of
> Service.
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > S P Q R
> > >
> > > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> > >
> > > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > > Roman Citizen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------
> > > Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
---
> ------
> > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > >
> > > * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
> > >
> > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?
> subject=Unsubscribe>
> > >
> > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of
> > > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
---
> ------
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39193 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Id. Nov.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est Idibus Novembribus; haec dies nefastus publicus est.

"This was followed almost immediately by a war with the Greeks on the
eastern coast. The Tarentines had encouraged the people of Palaeopolis
through their long resistance with vain hopes of succour, and when
they heard that the Romans had got possession of the place they
severely blamed the Palaeopolitans for leaving them in the lurch, as
though they were quite guiltless of having behaved in a similar manner
themselves. They were furious with the Romans, especially after they
found that the Lucanians and Apulians had established friendly
relations with them-for it was in this year that the alliance had been
formed-and they realised that they would be the next to be involved.
They saw that it must soon become a question of either fighting Rome
or submitting to her, and that their whole future in fact depended
upon the result of the Samnite war. That nation stood out alone, and
even their strength was inadequate for the struggle, now that the
Lucanians had abandoned them. They believed, however, that these could
still be brought back and induced to desert the Roman alliance, if
sufficient skill were shown in sowing the seeds of discord between
them. These arguments found general acceptance among a people who were
fickle and restless, and some young Lucanians, distinguished for their
unscrupulousness rather than for their sense of honour, were bribed to
make themselves tools of the war party. After scourging one another
with rods they presented themselves with their backs exposed, in the
popular Assembly, and loudly complained that after they had ventured
inside the Roman camp, they had been scourged by the consul's orders
and were within an ace of losing their heads. The affair had an ugly
look, and the visible evidence removed any suspicion of fraud. The
Assembly became greatly excited, and amidst loud shouts insisted upon
the magistrates convening the senate. When it assembled the senators
were surrounded by a crowd of spectators who clamoured for war with
Rome, whilst others went off into the country to rouse the peasantry
to arms. Even the coolest heads were carried away by the tumult of
popular feeling; a decree was passed that a fresh alliance should be
made with the Samnites, and negotiations were opened with them
accordingly. The Samnites did not feel much confidence in this sudden
and apparently groundless change of policy, and the Lucanians were
obliged to give hostages and allow the Samnites to garrison their
fortified places. Blinded by the imposition that had been practiced on
them and by their furious resentment at it, they made no difficulty
about accepting these terms. Shortly afterwards, when the authors of
the false charges had removed to Tarentum, they began to see how they
had been hoodwinked, but it was then too late, events were no longer
in their power, and nothing remained but unavailing repentance." -
Livy, History of Rome 8.27


"Vividi gaudens Feronia luco." - Vergil, Aeneid, viii.800

"His fractus ductor conuelli signa maniplis
optato laetis abitu iubet. itur in agros
diues ubi ante omnis colitur Feronia luco
et sacer umectat Flauinia rura Capenas." - Silius Italicus, Punica XIII.83

"Circaevmque ivgum circa hunc tractum Campaniae colebatur puer
Iuppiter, qui Anxyrus dicebatur, quasi aneu xurou, id est sine
novacula, quia barbam numquam rasisset, et Iuno virgo, quae Feronia
dicebatur. Est autem fons in Campania iuxta Terracinam, quae aliquando
Anxur est dicta." - Maurus Servius Honoratus, Commentary on the Aeneid
of Vergil 7.799

"Feronia was the ancient goddess of the market-place and fairs. This
would, as a matter of course, identify her with, and make her the
patron of, all strolling characters who frequent such places. But as
she had temples in Etruria, it is possible that she was common to both
races. The ancients were at a loss where to place her among the
deities; she appears, however, to be a goddess of the earth, and
allied to Mania. But what is most important of all for my purpose is
that she was feared, and that people brought her offerings. She often
appeared as an old woman who went about begging in the country, yet
she always had a gran pulitica--that is, she was intelligent or shrewd
or very cunning in manners--and, as one would have believed, she was a
witch. All who gave her alms were very fortunate, and their affairs
prospered. And if people could give her nothing because of their
poverty, when they returned home after the sun rose (dopo chiaro) they
found abundant gifts--enough to support all the family--so that
henceforth all went well with them; but if any who were rich gave her
nothing, and had evil hearts, she cursed them...The incident of the
begging, and the elegant style and distinguished air indicate a
character like that of Juno and Ceres combined." - C.G. Leland,
"Etruscan Roman Remains in Popular Tradition", ch. III p. 55

"At or near Feronia was a celebrated temple to the goddess of that
name, which, like many ancient shrines, stood in a thick grove — Lucus
Feroniae. She seems to have been identical with Proserpine, and was
worshipped by the Sabines, and Latins, as well as by the Etruscans.
Hither, on yearly festivals, pilgrims resorted in great numbers from
the surrounding country, many to perform vows and offer sacrifice —
and those who were possessed with the spirit of the goddess, walked
with naked feet over heaps of burning coal and ashes, without
receiving injury — and many merchants, artisans, and husbandmen,
taking advantage of the concourse, brought their goods hither for
sale, so that the market or fair held here was more splendid than any
other in Italy. From the numerous first-fruits, and other gifts
offered to the goddess, her shrine became renowned for its riches, and
was decorated with abundance of gold and silver. But it was despoiled
by Hannibal on his march through Italy. It was however maintained
till the fall of paganism in the fourth century. That the temple
itself stood on a height seems probable from the fact, mentioned by
Livy, of its being struck by lightning." - G. Dennis, "The Cities and
Cemeteries of Etruria", ch. 10

"These incidents led to his [Hannibal] withdrawal from Rome, and he
retired as far as the river Tutia, six miles distant from the City.
From there he marched to the grove of Feronia and the temple, which
was celebrated in those days for its wealth. The people of Capena and
other cities round used to bring their first-fruits and other
offerings, according to their ability, and they had also embellished
it with a considerable quantity of gold and silver. Now the temple was
despoiled of all its treasures. Great heaps of metal, where the
soldiers, struck by remorse, had thrown pieces of uncoined brass, were
found there after Hannibal's departure. All writers are agreed as to
the plundering of this temple. Coelius tell us that Hannibal diverted
his march to it while he was going from Eretum to Rome, after marching
from Amiternum by Reate and Cutiliae." - Livy, History of Rome 26.11

"After this war another arose against the Romans on the part of the
Sabine nation, the beginning and occasion of which was this. There is
a sanctuary, honoured in common by the Sabines and the Latins, that is
held in the greatest reverence and is dedicated to a goddess named
Feronia; some of those who translate the name into Greek call her
Anthophoros or "Flower Bearer," others Philostephanos or "Lover of
Garlands," and still others Persephone. To this sanctuary people used
to resort from the neighbouring cities on the appointed days of
festival, many of them performing vows and offering sacrifice to the
goddess and many with the purpose of trafficking during the festive
gathering as merchants, artisans and husbandmen; and here were held
fairs more celebrated than in any other places in Italy." - Dionysus
of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 3.32


Today is the second day of the three-day festival to Iuppiter, and is
held in honor of both him and the goddess Feronia. Since Iuppiter is
a pretty well-known deity, I am focussing on Feronia. Feronia is a
difficult goddess to identify; some sources claim that she is an
aspect of Iuno, or Ceres/Persephone, or both. She is also called the
"mother of the nymphs of Campania" by Servius (Commentary on the
Aeneid, 8.564), and Varro places her in the group of Sabine goddesses
("Feronia, Minerva, Novensides, a Sabinis." - de Lingua Latina V.74).
At Rome Feronia had a grove and later a temple in the Campus Martius;
the latter is attested only in the calendars. Since her cult at Rome
is curiously placed in the middle of the Plebeian Games, it was
probably older than they were, and it could go back to a primitive
fair, as at Lucus Feroniae. It is first mentioned at Rome when
expiatory offerings were ordered by the Sibylline in 217 BC: they were
extended even to the freedwomen (libertiinae), who according to their
ability had to contribute money for a gift to Feronia, while freewomen
(matronae) contributed to Iuno Regina on the Aventine, Though perhaps
originally an agricultural goddess (she received an offering of the
first-fruits of the season at Lucus Feroniae), she appears to have
acquired a special association with freemen and granting freedom to
slaves. In explaining her name Varro also called her Libertas,
"Libertatem deam dicit, Feroniam quasi Fidoniam", and an inscription
on a seat in her temple at Terracina, where freedman received the cap
of freedom (pilleus) on their shaved heads, runs "Let the deserving
sit down as slaves and rise as freemen" ("Bene meriti servi sedeant,
surgant liberi"). It appears that at Terracina slaves could take
sanctuary at her altar: this would be a Greek rather than a Roman custom.


This is probably also the "dies natalis" of a temple of Pietas
(Piety), since Pietas is mentioned with Fortuna Primigenia in a
inscription of the second century A.D. Her temple in the Forum
Holitorium was vowed by M. Acilius Glabrio at Thermolpylae (191) and
dedicated by his son ten years later. In it was a gilded statue of the
father, the first of its kind in Rome.The temple was destroyed in 44
B.C. to make room for the Theatre of Marcellus. One aspect of Pietas
was the relationship of parent and children, and this temple was
connected with the (Greek) story of a daughter who supplied her
imprisoned father or mother with her own milk. The connection may have
arisen from the nearby Columna (Lactaria), where infants in need of
milk were brought.


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy, Feronia (http://www.sacred-texts.com/pag/err/index.htm), Feronia
texts (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/) and A. Gryllo Graeco (NR)
(http://www.novaroma.org/forum/mainlist/2000/2000-11-13.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39194 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: To the Veterans
Valetudo quod fortuna omnes,

As a veteran and a "Flamen Privatus," I held a small ritual to honor
the US Veterans' Day yesterday with some friends, 3/4ths of whom
served.

Long ago, a formwer friend passed on a bit of wisdom: the warrior is
one who is willing to bear the Burden of shielding his people rom
harm.

I have written quite a bit on that theme.

This is the poem I read, which was written for Veterans' Day 4 years ago.

On Those Who Bore the Burden

To those who have, the Burden borne
For Folk and Land, and Honor's sake
We give our thanks, on Holy Day
Remembrance of, the Duty done

In cold and rain, through coal black night
In heat and wind, neath furnace sun
The Warrior, is always there
To stand and watch, o'er Home and Hearth

When bugles blare, sounding the Charge
They go to fight, and perhaps, die
Beating back fear, and going forth
Tis duty done, tis duty done

And if they fall, in faring forth
They're laid to rest, by friend or foe
With solemn nod, and solemn word
And then, perhaps, with solemn Call

After Duty, is fairly done
They venture Home, to Kin embrace
Sometimes to cheers, sometimes quiet
This lessens not, their Honored Name

And in their work, after service
They still guard weal, by building lives
By building homes, and families
Continuing, continuing

We who live free, because of them
Who sacrificed, and bled, and wept
Who duty did, and honor gained
Recall their Deeds, recall their Names

To those who have, the Burden borne
For Folk and Land, and Honor's sake
We give our thanks, on Holy Day
Remembrance of, the Duty done

----------------

Though the societies may have been different, or the national
politics, or other motivations; I share this one thing with the other
Veterans of the world, we bore the Burden.

Thank you my brothers and sisters in arms, for this I salute you.

Steven P. Robinson
Pvt - Army National Guard 1975 - 1979
SSgt - US Air Force Reserve 1982 - 1991

=========================================
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poet

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/


http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/

--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39195 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: New NR Flags
Salve Romans

Can someone tell me who has the original artwork of the Nova Roman Flag.
I need a copy on disk as I am trying to have some new flags made in a 3 by 5 format ( modern flag).
Some of these will have one side correct and others will be correct on both sides. It just depends on cost.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39196 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Calenders
Salvete

Unfortunately, this year, the Provincia Hispania have not obtained the necessary sponsor to print the calendars for the next year.

Valete

M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
PROPRAETOR·HISPANIAE
SCRIBA·CENSORIS·CFBQ
SCRIBA·COHORS·APPROBATIONVM
SCRIBA·MAGISTER·ARANEARIUS
NOVA·ROMA
http://commentariola.blogspot.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 12:47 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Calenders


Salvete

Does Provinica Hispania plan on selling calenders again for the upcoming year?

If so, I (and I am sure many others) would like to buy one again.

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39197 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Calenders
Salve M CVR·COMPLVTENSIS<mailto:complutensis@...>

How much would it cost?


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


----- Original Message -----
From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS<mailto:complutensis@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Calenders


Salvete

Unfortunately, this year, the Provincia Hispania have not obtained the necessary sponsor to print the calendars for the next year.

Valete

M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
PROPRAETOR·HISPANIAE
SCRIBA·CENSORIS·CFBQ
SCRIBA·COHORS·APPROBATIONVM
SCRIBA·MAGISTER·ARANEARIUS
NOVA·ROMA
http://commentariola.blogspot.com<http://commentariola.blogspot.com/>
----- Original Message -----
From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 12:47 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Calenders


Salvete

Does Provinica Hispania plan on selling calenders again for the upcoming year?

If so, I (and I am sure many others) would like to buy one again.

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39198 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII - QUIZ - DAY 3 - Answers
Salve

7) All of them, save one whou would had became the ancestor of teh
cunctator, were killed while fighting in a war against Veius

8) He betrayed Priamus out of envy for Alexander, and was therefore
granted leave from the city

9) Acron, of the Caeninians, Tolumnius of the Veians and Viromarus (or
Viridomarus), king of the Gauls.

Valete

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis Iterum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39199 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII - QUIZ - DAY 3 - Ranking
Salve

In what seem to be a private game between Tita Artoria Marcella and
Titus Iulius Sabinus, this is the current Ranking, by number of
correct answers:

6 - Tita Artoria Marcella, Titus Iulius Sabinus
1 - Quintus Suetonius Paulinus

valete

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis Iterum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39200 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: New NR Flags, distribution of coins
M. Lucretius Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.

It pleases me to see such activity within the Res Publica. C.
Vipsanius Agrippa very recently and now the notice below.


This reminds me of a recent thought I had, after re-reading messages
from about three years ago. The thread started off with number 5593
and another thread started at 5602.


To summarize, the issue was the difficulty in obtaining Nova Roma
coins and one suggestion was that provincial governors should act as
distribution points. The difficulty was real, and not just for Nova
Roma citizens. I don't mean to point fingers when I report to you that
collectors outside of Nova Roma in general have a very bad opinion of
us. This is because of their experiences with obtaining the original
coins. Now that there is some rumor that coins may be produced again,
and seeing that attracting collector interest has several benefits for
the Res Publica, it is well that the issue of distribution be brought
up again.


It is my hope that private merchants, I mean our Equestrians, will
obtain supplies of any new coins or proof coins for resale. The coins
are at present backed by the Treasury at a rate of fifty US cents,
Like with any circulating currency, it is a private matter at what
price a buyer chooses to obtain numismatic items. For example, I have
some very nice solid silver "Kennedy" half dollars. I believe that the
collector value of these is more than fifty cents, but their value in
commerce is simply the fifty cent face value.

If coins are produced in the Americas, for example, a retailer based
in Europe might obtain a supply and sell them at a half a Euro each.
Now that is a bit more than half a US dollar, but a buyer in Europe
may prefer the quicker delivery and lower shipping costs of the
European seller, even at the slightly higher price. I repeat that this
would in no way interfere with the Treasury backing rate of fifty US
cents.

It would further be my hope that in view of the service to the Res
Publica that they provide, that the merchants would be charged no fees
for sales of any coins. Of course, if any civil officials care to act
as distribution points for any future coins, that would not be
precluded. I'm thinking here of governors, for example, who obtain
supplied for distribution at regional gatherings.

Additionally, I see no reason why the Res Publica should have to busy
itself with many small direct transactions. Let us encourage our
Equestrians and our civil officers by not putting them in direct
competition with the state.


In short, if future coins are produced I hope that there will be many
distributors and that a free market model will be used.





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Timothy P. Gallagher"
<spqr753@m...> wrote:
>
> Salve Romans
>
> Can someone tell me who has the original artwork of the Nova Roman
Flag.
> I need a copy on disk as I am trying to have some new flags made in
a 3 by 5 format ( modern flag).
> Some of these will have one side correct and others will be correct
on both sides. It just depends on cost.
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39201 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Calenders
Salve,

the last year the cost was of 3000 euro (3500 US $) aprox.

Vale optime

M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
PROPRAETOR·HISPANIAE
SCRIBA·CENSORIS·CFBQ
SCRIBA·COHORS·APPROBATIONVM
SCRIBA·MAGISTER·ARANEARIUS
NOVA·ROMA
http://commentariola.blogspot.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Timothy P. Gallagher
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Calenders


Salve M CVR·COMPLVTENSIS<mailto:complutensis@...>

How much would it cost?


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


----- Original Message -----
From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS<mailto:complutensis@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Calenders


Salvete

Unfortunately, this year, the Provincia Hispania have not obtained the necessary sponsor to print the calendars for the next year.

Valete

M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
PROPRAETOR·HISPANIAE
SCRIBA·CENSORIS·CFBQ
SCRIBA·COHORS·APPROBATIONVM
SCRIBA·MAGISTER·ARANEARIUS
NOVA·ROMA
http://commentariola.blogspot.com<http://commentariola.blogspot.com/>
----- Original Message -----
From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 12:47 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Calenders


Salvete

Does Provinica Hispania plan on selling calenders again for the upcoming year?

If so, I (and I am sure many others) would like to buy one again.

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39202 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII - QUIZ - DAY 4 - Architecture
Salve

Questions for the 4th day of the Ludii (answers within midnight, Rome time):

10) How did the Romans solved the problem of the self-sustaining
weight of Panetho's dome? More precisely, how they managed to avoid
the dome collapsing undr its own weight?

11) How was called the excavation in which, at a later stage, would
had found their place the various layers that composed a typical roman
"Via"?

12) How was called the raised level on which temples were usually
placed upon and following which model the romans used that solution?

Valete

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis Iterum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39203 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Calenders
Salve M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS


Here is an Idea. You could franchise the calendars out. Say I was willing to invest toward the $3500. I would get the calendars and I would be able to sell them in say North America. Other Citizens could get Spain and Portugal, others Italy, or South America ect or by NR province. What do you think?


vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


----- Original Message -----
From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS<mailto:complutensis@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 8:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Calenders


Salve,

the last year the cost was of 3000 euro (3500 US $) aprox.

Vale optime

M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
PROPRAETOR·HISPANIAE
SCRIBA·CENSORIS·CFBQ
SCRIBA·COHORS·APPROBATIONVM
SCRIBA·MAGISTER·ARANEARIUS
NOVA·ROMA
http://commentariola.blogspot.com<http://commentariola.blogspot.com/>
----- Original Message -----
From: Timothy P. Gallagher
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Calenders


Salve M CVR·COMPLVTENSIS<mailto:complutensis@...>

How much would it cost?


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


----- Original Message -----
From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS<mailto:complutensis@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Calenders


Salvete

Unfortunately, this year, the Provincia Hispania have not obtained the necessary sponsor to print the calendars for the next year.

Valete

M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
PROPRAETOR·HISPANIAE
SCRIBA·CENSORIS·CFBQ
SCRIBA·COHORS·APPROBATIONVM
SCRIBA·MAGISTER·ARANEARIUS
NOVA·ROMA
http://commentariola.blogspot.com<http://commentariola.blogspot.com/><http://commentariola.blogspot.com/<http://commentariola.blogspot.com/>>
----- Original Message -----
From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 12:47 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Calenders


Salvete

Does Provinica Hispania plan on selling calenders again for the upcoming year?

If so, I (and I am sure many others) would like to buy one again.

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39204 From: vespasian72001 Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Calenders
Salve,
You wrote:
> Unfortunately, this year, the Provincia Hispania have not obtained
the necessary sponsor to print the calendars for the next year.
Would that be monetary, or would it be an organization TO print the
calendars?
If it is monetarysponsorship you need, I urge all here to "Dono Dare"
ASAP.
Vale,

Vespasianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39205 From: vespasian72001 Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Toga query
Salvete Omnes,
perhaps I need to direct this question to those of the Equestrian
Order.
I was wondering firstly if there is any current place that sells
togas, or the material for togas.
Secondly, I was wondering if we could start selling these things
through Nova Roma.
This is my wish for all other Roman articles--from authentic
reproductions of helmets, to of course the coins (on-going debate
there), to sandals, tunics, etc.
Valete omnes,

Vespasianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39206 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: New NR Flags, distribution of coins
Salvete omnes,

With regards to selling merchandise, we are no longer in the 50's or
60's where everything takes 4-6 weeks for delivery. The public is
more demanding today and they want their merchandise like YESTERDAY
or RIGHT AWAY. As an example, I hardly visit book stores anymore
since a book I order on line that isn't in the stores usually appears
in 2 or three days; my step daughter and her friends do well on Ebay
but they are on top of orders all the time and have them shipped off
the same day they are paid leaving very haooy customers.

When running a business, one has to give it 100% and personal
problems of any sort must be put on the back burner or make sure
there are others who can take over and keep things going temporarily.
The friends and family will have a great deal of sympathy for your
troubles but your creditors, customers and taxman couldn't care less.
Failure to do this always always spells the end of the business from
what I have observed since customers consider you unreliable and move
on to someone else.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39207 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Toga query
Salve Vespasianus,

The website you want to check out is www.lawrensnest.com They have everything your looking for and if you don't see it, they'll get it for you. At very affordable pricing. No... I don't get a royalty ;-)

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus


----- Original Message -----
From: vespasian72001
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 9:55 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Toga query


Salvete Omnes,
perhaps I need to direct this question to those of the Equestrian
Order.
I was wondering firstly if there is any current place that sells
togas, or the material for togas.
Secondly, I was wondering if we could start selling these things
through Nova Roma.
This is my wish for all other Roman articles--from authentic
reproductions of helmets, to of course the coins (on-going debate
there), to sandals, tunics, etc.
Valete omnes,

Vespasianus





SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
Roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.0/167 - Release Date: 11/11/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39208 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: New NR Flags, distribution of coins
How true!

----- Original Message -----
From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 10:26 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: New NR Flags, distribution of coins


Salvete omnes,

With regards to selling merchandise, we are no longer in the 50's or
60's where everything takes 4-6 weeks for delivery. The public is
more demanding today and they want their merchandise like YESTERDAY
or RIGHT AWAY. As an example, I hardly visit book stores anymore
since a book I order on line that isn't in the stores usually appears
in 2 or three days; my step daughter and her friends do well on Ebay
but they are on top of orders all the time and have them shipped off
the same day they are paid leaving very haooy customers.

When running a business, one has to give it 100% and personal
problems of any sort must be put on the back burner or make sure
there are others who can take over and keep things going temporarily.
The friends and family will have a great deal of sympathy for your
troubles but your creditors, customers and taxman couldn't care less.
Failure to do this always always spells the end of the business from
what I have observed since customers consider you unreliable and move
on to someone else.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus





SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
Roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.0/167 - Release Date: 11/11/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39209 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Toga query
C. Equitius Cato Vespasiano S.P.D.

Salve Vespasianus.

There is an excellent supplier of togas called La Wren's Nest; their
website is located here:

http://www.lawrensnest.com

I have purchased from them, and the quality and style are excellent.
I would highly recommend them. I'm not sure if there would be a need
to get another supplier, but as mentioned before we might want to
encourage as many merchandisers as possible to be involved with the
Republic.

Vale bene,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "vespasian72001" <agraham2@s...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes,
> perhaps I need to direct this question to those of the Equestrian
> Order.
> I was wondering firstly if there is any current place that sells
> togas, or the material for togas.
> Secondly, I was wondering if we could start selling these things
> through Nova Roma.
> This is my wish for all other Roman articles--from authentic
> reproductions of helmets, to of course the coins (on-going debate
> there), to sandals, tunics, etc.
> Valete omnes,
>
> Vespasianus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39210 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Holiday Purchases from Harpax
Salvete omnes

With the Christmachanukwanalia season approaching, gift buying is in full swing.

If you want to order something for under the tree or aluminum pole, your order must be in by November 22nd (for shipping locations in the US). The date for regular mail has passed for European customers and Canadians have until December 9th. If your deadline has passed you can still place your order but there will be an extra charge for delivery (with Xpresspost or air mail).

If you don't care about the delivery date, the shipping rates remain the same.

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39211 From: David Santo Orcero Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Salvete, omnes:



> We should not infer, though, that Hindus and Buddhists have never
> engaged in total war or other indiscriminate killing.

It was not common, whatever, if caused by religion; and this is my
discussion point. A war by religion has no sense in Hinduist
and Buddhist religions. These are not proselitist religions.

Ok, on the four kingdoms age chinese people killed between themselves.
Japanese has been killing between themselves since the born of Japan, and
have attaked to Corea and other countries in the past.

In Sri Lanka there thas been some ethnic civil wars also. And in Vietnam
and Birmania.

Anyway, I can not find proselitism as a merit in any of the core
teachings of neither of two religions. Christianity and Islam _do_ say
that proselitism is a merit.

This is _really_ important; because my comentary is based on this
fact. And It matters if you look to Roma, and from
Roma to here. In Roma mentality, proselitism was not a merit. That's why
forgeiner deities were respected meanwhile the adepts of these cults
maintained respect for Roma deities.

I can not renember exactly in what part of Japanese history Sinto people
begin a campain "convert to Sinto or die". I can not renember exactly in
what part of Japanese history Budist people begin a campain "convert to
budism or die". The same in China between Confucians, Taoists and Budists,
and the same in India between Hindu and Budhist people. I have _lots_ of
examples of "convert to Crist or die" wars in Europe and in America. That
is the point.

By the other side, etnic wars are _not_ religious wars. It is a
completly different beast. Some of the wars that has been comented between
non-proselitist cults (and you have comented) are, in fact, etnic wars.

Let's look in Roma for an example that kind of wars. What the people
would say if I say "Roman people invaded Galia because they want druid
cult followers to convert to Jupiter cult?" This has no sense, because
that was an etnic war.

Returning to my message, what I said in other words is that "Nearly all
the wars in Buddist and Hindu countries were etnic wars or civil wars, but
those religions have no caused neither a great war neither mass
exterminations by the religion itself.".

In fact, I thing that religious wars are a strage beast. Historically,
the most of the religions have not had that problem. Think on Roman gods,
east religions (like Isis or Cibeles cult), druid cult, and those
politeist religions.


Yours:

Lucius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39212 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Calenders
Salvete

I too would love to have another calendar for next year- I have found it
invaluable.

S Pontius Pilatus Barbatus



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Timothy P. Gallagher
Sent: 13 November 2005 13:28
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Calenders



Salve M CVR.COMPLVTENSIS<mailto:complutensis@...>

How much would it cost?


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


----- Original Message -----
From: M.CVR.COMPLVTENSIS<mailto:complutensis@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Calenders


Salvete

Unfortunately, this year, the Provincia Hispania have not obtained the
necessary sponsor to print the calendars for the next year.

Valete

M.CVR.COMPLVTENSIS
PROPRAETOR.HISPANIAE
SCRIBA.CENSORIS.CFBQ
SCRIBA.COHORS.APPROBATIONVM
SCRIBA.MAGISTER.ARANEARIUS
NOVA.ROMA
http://commentariola.blogspot.com<http://commentariola.blogspot.com/>
----- Original Message -----
From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 12:47 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Calenders


Salvete

Does Provinica Hispania plan on selling calenders again for the
upcoming year?

If so, I (and I am sure many others) would like to buy one again.

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group
"Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogrou
ps.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39213 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Valetudo quod fortuna Lucius

Good points in your observations about intertribal warfare throughout history.

Religion is, in my observation, only one component of any culture. It
can be a very important, perhaps overwhelming, part, which drives
certain behaviors (such as the Aztec campaigns to gain sacrificcial
victims, the slayings of Heathen Anglo-Saxons by Charlemagne, pogroms
against Jews at various times and places and such like).

But, like you, I think that most strife is over more prosaic reasons:
land and resources, or sometimes, simple hatred of those different and
thought to pose a threat.

=========================================
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poet

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/

--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39214 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
> Let's look in Roma for an example that kind of wars. What the
people
> would say if I say "Roman people invaded Galia because they want
druid
> cult followers to convert to Jupiter cult?" This has no sense,
because
> that was an etnic war.
>
>
Salvete omnes,

but religion was tied in:

"Prior to the Christian Era, Egypt, Greece, and Rome, along with
most of the rest of the world, were pantheisticpolytheistic (not
pantheistic) societies. Each family had their household gods, each
city or other place had its special gods, and nations might have
their own gods. It was tradition and in many places law to show
respect to local gods when visiting. To enter Athens and refuse to
show respect to Athena was tantamount to a declaration of personal
enmity to the city and its people.

Strict Monotheism enters the picture with Akhenaten (1364-1347 BC),
Pharaoh of Egypt. He proclaimed that there was no god but Aten (Ra),
and ordered all references to other gods in the kingdom demolished
or excised, forbidding even the use of the plural form of their word
for god. Since this had the effect of uniting all religious
authority in the Pharaoh and the side-effect of impounding all the
wealth of the other temples to his personal use, it is possible that
non-religious factors played a part in his conversion. After
Akhenaten's death Egypt reverted to pantheistic practice.

Shortly after the death of Akhenaten and also out of Egypt came
monotheistic Judaism under Moses, its first great rule-giver. Among
the ten commandments of the new religion was one that forbade
absolutely any show of respect for any other god than its one true
god. When Imperial Rome extended its reach to their area, varous
conflicts arose. Judaism had generally been tolerant of non-Jews
worshipping their own gods in private in Jewish territory, but
Jewish leaders were divided in their response to the requirements of
Roman Law. Sadducees believed that some participation in Roman
public cults was acceptable, while Pharisees forbade any contact.
Imperial Rome at first exempted Jews from the requirement to
participate in public cults, though this exemption was removed in
the Christian Era.

Another religious persecution undertaken by the Roman Republic
involved Julius Caesar's conquest of Gaul. Caesar identified the
Druids as a source of Celtic hostility to Rome and to Roman
civilisation, and accordingly undertook their eradication. He gives
a mostly unflattering albeit grudgingly respectful account of the
Druids in his Gallic Wars; his account of their human sacrifices
seems likely to have been exaggerated. He may have been motivated in
part to invade the island of Britain at least in part to eliminate a
stronghold of Druidism, and the later Roman author Tacitus gives a
dramatic account of an assault on the island of Anglesey, a Druid
stronghold.

Out of Judaism came Christianity, which because it was strictly
monotheistic and also encouraged conversion was a much more powerful
threat to the established pantheistic order than had been Judaism.
The Jewish exemption from the requirement to participate in public
cults was lifted and the anti-monotheistic religious persecution of
the Christians began under Nero."

Wikpedia


A lot of political and personal greed is behind the religious wars.
The Koran mentions a forced conversion is a bad conversion, Jesus
told his followers to spread the good news and for those that would
hear none of it, just kick the dust of the town off your sandals and
move on. Nothing was taught about crusades, wiping out other
religions etc.

Regards,

QSP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39215 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes.

Misery loves company, so here we go:


"War is enjoined against the infidels." - the Holy Qu'ran, Surah II.215

"And say not of those who are slain in fight for the religion of God,
that they are dead; yea they are living, but ye do not understand." -
ibid. II.155

"They desire that you should disbelieve as they have disbelieved, so
that you might be (all) alike; therefore take not from among them
friends until they fly (their homes) in Allah's way; but if they turn
back, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them, and take
not from among them a friend or a helper." - IV.89

"When your Lord revealed to the angels: I am with you, therefore make
firm those who believe. I will cast terror into the hearts of those
who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every
fingertip of them." - ibid. VIII.12

"Say to the Infidels: if they desist from their unbelief, what is now
past shall be forgiven; but if they return to it, they have already
before them the doom of the ancients! Fight then against them till
strife be at an end, and the religion be all of it God's."- VIII.39-42

"Oh True believers, wage war against such of the infidels as are near
you." - ibid. IX.124

"When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find
them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for
them." - ibid. IX.5

"Prophet, make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and deal
rigorously with them. Hell shall be their home: an evil fate." - ibid.
IX.73

"When ye encounter the unbelievers, strike off their heads until ye
have made a great slaughter among them." - ibid. XLVII.4


So much for Islam. How about Judaism? Well:

"They entered into a covenant to seek the Lord, the God of their
fathers, with all their heart and soul; and everyone who would not
seek the Lord, the God of Israel, was to be put to death, whether
small or great, whether man or woman." - 2 Chronicles 15:12-13

"Suppose you hear in one of the towns the LORD your God is giving you
that some worthless rabble among you have led their fellow citizens
astray by encouraging them to worship foreign gods. In such cases, you
must examine the facts carefully. If you find it is true and can prove
that such a detestable act has occurred among you, you must attack
that town and completely destroy all its inhabitants, as well as all
the livestock." - Deuteronomy 13:13-15


It seems that Christianity, alone among the three great monotheistic
religions, does not actually advocate the wholesale slaughter of
non-believers. I am NOT saying that Christians have not in fact
slaughtered --- it's only too historically true; ONLY that nowhere in
the New Testament are Christians instructed to kill, as the Jews and
Moslems are.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39216 From: David Santo Orcero Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Salvete, Omnes:

> but religion was tied in:

(...)

> Another religious persecution undertaken by the Roman Republic
> involved Julius Caesar's conquest of Gaul. Caesar identified the
> Druids as a source of Celtic hostility to Rome and to Roman
> civilisation, and accordingly undertook their eradication. He gives
> a mostly unflattering albeit grudgingly respectful account of the
> Druids in his Gallic Wars; his account of their human sacrifices
> seems likely to have been exaggerated. He may have been motivated in
> part to invade the island of Britain at least in part to eliminate a
> stronghold of Druidism, and the later Roman author Tacitus gives a
> dramatic account of an assault on the island of Anglesey, a Druid
> stronghold.

:-?

I was ironic when I talked about religious war on the conquest of
Galiae.

Let's see some facts:


From the age of the roman kings to the republican Rome, the only time
that Roma city has been sieged, defeated, plundered and burned was by
Gallii.

That defeat was in the imaginery of Roman people during ages: Suplicius,
the consular tribune that lost the battle for defending Rome, gave his
name to a deffinition of "suffering and torture", and in modern times some
Romanic languages keeps the word "suplicio" with that meaning.

The next year, the Pontifex declarated that days (Postridie idus
Quintiles) as dies atri. Postridie idus quintiles wasn't dies atri before
the plunder of Rome.

The eigty older and wiser patricians stayed on their curules chairs on
the forum, waiting for the dead for cleaning the guilt of Rome. Gallii
thought that they were statues when they arriveds the forum. They were
killed when one of the Gallii touched M. Papirio's white beard, and
discovered that they were living beings.

All the moruments, registers, books were destroyied. Most wise men
died, and the economy colapsed. The most optimistics evaluations says
that Roma needed 50 years to return to the ecomical and
political normality. Roma also had to reconquest the whole italic
peninsulae.

All the Roman strategy and organization of the army changed the following
years.

The Gallii atacked 30 years later, and atacked again and again until
Julius Caesar won the Galiae war.

The only exit by land for Roman in that land passed by Gallii land.

Galiae was strategical due to the agrary work that can be done there.
Grain was scarce and expensive, and Ostia port was saturated.

Gallii is a contraction for Gal Proelium.


Druid religion was practiced in Galia in particular and in the whole
roman empire as general during centuries, and it can be found druids
until Teodosius imperator. The prosecution of the druids began with
Teodosius.



The only druids that were killed on the republic were Gallii's druid.
The only Gallii druid that were killed was during the war. The druids take
part actively on the military welfare on celtic tribes. Druid was a celtic
priest of celtic religion; and in all the places of the republic and the
empire were celtic were assimilated, druid existed before, during and
after gallii war.

Druids made a really important role on celtic wellfare, and participated
on the battlefield operations. A celtic druid was not all this new-age
stuff that we see on TV, and it is not that Panoramix stuff. The most of
high-rank gallii druids were also warlords (see Diviciacus, as an
example). The druids in republic age did not taugh the celtic "how to be
one with gaia". They taught strategy, tactical wellfare and battlefield
and weapon techniques. They taught history and myths of the tribe, and
those that were not warlords worked as ambassors between warlods.



War of Galiae of Julius Caesar is a beatiful piece of Julius Caesar
propaganda about the heroicity of Julius Caesar.

What makes me to do the follolwing deductions:

On Julius Caesar's time, galii was the geopolitical enemy of Rome.

The area of expansion of Rome passed by Galiae.

The economical and geopolitical interest passed by controling Galiae.

Rome as city has some debts to fix with Galii. Revenge is great.

Julius Caesar has a strong interest on give information about how brave,
rude and savage the galii were. And roman imaginery also pointed in that
direction due to the point before. From here come the "horrors" of Gallii
rites telled by Julius Caesar.

Only were killed druids if they were gauls. Non-gauls druids do not were
killed, no matter than all the celtics druids practice the same religion.
After the war, no more gauls druids were killed.

The active part of Gallii druids on welfare explains by itself why Julius
Caesar didn't liked too much gallii druids: they taught how to fight
eficienty, were warlords or coordinate and unite different warlords. They
were the leaders. It is normal that in war times Julius attacked to the
head of the enemy.

Druid religion was heavily prosecuted by christians (in some parts of
the former empire, during the begining of the middle age), what means
that did not dissapear on the empire.


Yours:

Lucius Cornelius Malacitanus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39217 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: IT'S ENOUGH!
And no doubt, as Robert Frost put it 'And that has made all the difference' :)

> Well, I should point out that I only chose 3 of the names.
>
> Vale,
>
> Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sensei Phil Perez" <senseiphil@...>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 6:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] IT'S ENOUGH!
>
> > Or: Mua ha ha...Mua ha ha ha ha ;-)
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: annia@...
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 5:58 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] IT'S ENOUGH!
> >
> >
> > HAHAHAHAHA!!
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <me-in-@...>
> > To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 5:13 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] IT'S ENOUGH!
> >
> >
> > > Salve Audens Sempronia (you have oo many names for me to sure which are
> > > the
> > > 'polite' ones)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of
> > the roman empire
> > Roman empire
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
> >
> > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service.
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.0/167 - Release Date:
> > 11/11/2005
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
>
> Ancient history
>
> Fall of the roman empire
>
> The fall of the roman empire
>
> Roman empire
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
</blockquote></BODY>

"THE VERY BIG STUPID is a thing which breeds by eating The
Future. Have you seen it? It sometimes disguises itself as a good-looking
quarterly bottom line, derived by closing the R&D Department" - Frank
Zappa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39218 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: ITS ENOUGH!
A **Spade** . How dare you use such racist terms in a multimacronational and no
boubt multiracial forum! I shall be reporting you to - well, anything I can
think to report you to.
Caesaroensis in the Dugeon of the Highest.

> The problem is society is gosh-darn sensitive these
> days.If I say call a spade,a spade. someone will read
> into it,gasp & shout How Dare You!! Its silly.
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <annia@...>
> wrote:
> > Salve,
> >
> > Yes, I agree that your posts were not anti-semitic.
> >
> > Vale,
> >

"THE VERY BIG STUPID is a thing which breeds by eating The
Future. Have you seen it? It sometimes disguises itself as a good-looking
quarterly bottom line, derived by closing the R&D Department" - Frank
Zappa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39219 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Holy Books, Religion & God-A commentary from F. Galerius Aureli
> > >
> > > Lets not forget who originally said:
> > >
> > > "love God with all your heart and treat your neighbor as you would
> be treated"
> > >
> > > Vires et honos,
> > > Marcus Cassius Philippus
> >
> > Hammurabi?
> >
>
> I don't know about that, but there is rent control there:
>
> "121: If any one store corn in another man's house he shall pay him
> storage at the rate of one gur for every five ka of corn per year. "
>
> I'm sure the storage rate for five ka of corn is higher than one gur,
> but by how much I cannot say. Does anyone have the gur/yen exchange
> rate? I may need to store five ka of corn for about a year.
>
> M. Lucr. Agricola
>

I think Hillel is said to have got there first. Most annoyingly, I got hold of a
bible claiming 'English for Today' to find it not merely childish language but
has translated (I assume) the measurements into Standard International Metric.
I don't immediate relate to that system anyway but far more important is that
many numbers obviously have ritual significance and lose meaning if the
relations between various measures are lost. If something is 12 Cubits long
there may be a meaning in 12, like one for each tribe. Make that - what, about 5
metres? - and so much for what may have been meant at the time. I still want a
really good bilingual cross-referenced Doué though.

"THE VERY BIG STUPID is a thing which breeds by eating The
Future. Have you seen it? It sometimes disguises itself as a good-looking
quarterly bottom line, derived by closing the R&D Department" - Frank
Zappa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39220 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
I see your point. Buddhism is a proselytising religion but never by force. That
would completely contradict the idea. In Tibet it began a horrible campaign
aganist the Bon shamans but that was after it was well established - like the
Christian Inquisition. In any case, Buddhism in Tibet is a very strange business
all round that sometimes looks like black magic. I am not so sure that Islam
intended first to convert. Arabs wanted to conquer places more civilised than
their own but they were forbidden to proselytisse Jews, Christians and
'Sabaeans' - probably Parsees but somebody else claimed it first. That shows
even the first Caliphs did not know who these Sabaeans were. If a religion has a
War God it follows it has wars!

But it never makes sense for either believers in many gods or believers that
everything is God to force their views on others. Many gods can always add more
and Hinduism can do that better than most by multiple incarnations as well, and
everything God means nobody cannot in some way be recognising God even if only
in part. As far as I know, Hindus cover both, Buddhists do too but don't think
much of the gods, and Sufis can approach the 'all is Divine' view. Maybe they
descend from these 'Sabaeans' since they started in the right area!
Caesariensis

>
> Salvete, omnes:
>
> > We should not infer, though, that Hindus and Buddhists have never
> > engaged in total war or other indiscriminate killing.
>
> It was not common, whatever, if caused by religion; and this is my
> discussion point. A war by religion has no sense in Hinduist
> and Buddhist religions. These are not proselitist religions.
>
> Ok, on the four kingdoms age chinese people killed between themselves.
> Japanese has been killing between themselves since the born of Japan, and
> have attaked to Corea and other countries in the past.
>
> In Sri Lanka there thas been some ethnic civil wars also. And in Vietnam
> and Birmania.
>
> Anyway, I can not find proselitism as a merit in any of the core
> teachings of neither of two religions. Christianity and Islam _do_ say
> that proselitism is a merit.
>
> This is _really_ important; because my comentary is based on this
> fact. And It matters if you look to Roma, and from
> Roma to here. In Roma mentality, proselitism was not a merit. That's why
> forgeiner deities were respected meanwhile the adepts of these cults
> maintained respect for Roma deities.
>
> I can not renember exactly in what part of Japanese history Sinto people
> begin a campain "convert to Sinto or die". I can not renember
> exactly in what part of Japanese history Budist people begin a campain "
> ;convert to budism or die". The same in China between Confucians,
> Taoists and Budists, and the same in India between Hindu and Budhist people.
> I have _lots_ of examples of "convert to Crist or die" wars in
> Europe and in America. That is the point.
>
> By the other side, etnic wars are _not_ religious wars. It is a
> completly different beast. Some of the wars that has been comented between
> non-proselitist cults (and you have comented) are, in fact, etnic wars.
>
> Let's look in Roma for an example that kind of wars. What the people
> would say if I say "Roman people invaded Galia because they want druid
> cult followers to convert to Jupiter cult?" This has no sense, because
> that was an etnic war.
>
> Returning to my message, what I said in other words is that "Nearly all
> the wars in Buddist and Hindu countries were etnic wars or civil wars, but
> those religions have no caused neither a great war neither mass
> exterminations by the religion itself.".
>
> In fact, I thing that religious wars are a strage beast. Historically,
> the most of the religions have not had that problem. Think on Roman gods,
> east religions (like Isis or Cibeles cult), druid cult, and those
> politeist religions.
>
> Yours:
>
> Lucius
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
</blockquote></BODY>

"THE VERY BIG STUPID is a thing which breeds by eating The
Future. Have you seen it? It sometimes disguises itself as a good-looking
quarterly bottom line, derived by closing the R&D Department" - Frank
Zappa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39221 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
> for god. Since this had the effect of uniting all religious
> authority in the Pharaoh and the side-effect of impounding all the
> wealth of the other temples to his personal use, it is possible that
> non-religious factors played a part in his conversion. After
> Akhenaten's death Egypt reverted to pantheistic practice.
>
> Shortly after the death of Akhenaten and also out of Egypt came
> monotheistic Judaism under Moses, its first great rule-giver. Among
> the ten commandments of the new religion was one that forbade
> absolutely any show of respect for any other god than its one true
> god. When Imperial Rome extended its reach to their area, varous


And if these two things are not linked (Freud concluded Moses was Akhnaton but I
wouldn't go that far. Still, his name at court was probably Atonmoshe) then its
pure coincidence that clouds like to gather wherever it's raining :)
Caesariensis

"God created man and man created God. So is it in the world. Men make
gods and they worship their creations. If would be fitting for the gods to
worship men" - Gospel of Thomas, Logion 85:1-4
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39222 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
I suspect that Christians were expecting the Day of Judgement so imminant -
literally according to St.Paul, a case of drop everything and prepare, that they
felt no need for a slaughter they were expecting God to do on his own account.

> OSD C. Equitius Cato
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> Misery loves company, so here we go:
>
> "War is enjoined against the infidels." - the Holy Qu'ran, Surah
> II.215
> "And say not of those who are slain in fight for the religion of God,
> that they are dead; yea they are living, but ye do not understand." -
> ibid. II.155
>
> "They desire that you should disbelieve as they have disbelieved, so
> that you might be (all) alike; therefore take not from among them
> friends until they fly (their homes) in Allah's way; but if they turn
> back, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them, and take
> not from among them a friend or a helper." - IV.89
>
> "When your Lord revealed to the angels: I am with you, therefore make
> firm those who believe. I will cast terror into the hearts of those
> who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every
> fingertip of them." - ibid. VIII.12
>
> "Say to the Infidels: if they desist from their unbelief, what is now
> past shall be forgiven; but if they return to it, they have already
> before them the doom of the ancients! Fight then against them till
> strife be at an end, and the religion be all of it God's."- VIII.39-42
>
> "Oh True believers, wage war against such of the infidels as are near
> you." - ibid. IX.124
>
> "When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find
> them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for
> them." - ibid. IX.5
>
> "Prophet, make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and deal
> rigorously with them. Hell shall be their home: an evil fate." - ibid.
> IX.73
>
> "When ye encounter the unbelievers, strike off their heads until ye
> have made a great slaughter among them." - ibid. XLVII.4
>
> So much for Islam. How about Judaism? Well:
>
> "They entered into a covenant to seek the Lord, the God of their
> fathers, with all their heart and soul; and everyone who would not
> seek the Lord, the God of Israel, was to be put to death, whether
> small or great, whether man or woman." - 2 Chronicles 15:12-13
>
> "Suppose you hear in one of the towns the LORD your God is giving you
> that some worthless rabble among you have led their fellow citizens
> astray by encouraging them to worship foreign gods. In such cases, you
> must examine the facts carefully. If you find it is true and can prove
> that such a detestable act has occurred among you, you must attack
> that town and completely destroy all its inhabitants, as well as all
> the livestock." - Deuteronomy 13:13-15
>
> It seems that Christianity, alone among the three great monotheistic
> religions, does not actually advocate the wholesale slaughter of
> non-believers. I am NOT saying that Christians have not in fact
> slaughtered --- it's only too historically true; ONLY that nowhere in
> the New Testament are Christians instructed to kill, as the Jews and
> Moslems are.
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
>
> Ancient history
>
> Fall of the roman empire
>
> The fall of the roman empire
>
> Roman empire
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
</blockquote></BODY>

"God created man and man created God. So is it in the world. Men make
gods and they worship their creations. If would be fitting for the gods to
worship men" - Gospel of Thomas, Logion 85:1-4
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39223 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Druidery remained in Ireland but disappeared 'overnight'. Exactly the same very
clever poetry that Druids had written, Christian leaders did. Conclusion: the
religious Elite saw no problem with expanding their ideas to include the new
reliogion. And Ireland has one big diffrence from Gallia and Britannia: they
could write, and in their own language. That says something in itself, Irish
monks never felt the need to revere Latin as superior to Irish and often
regarded it as inferior.

Now, one thing other druids did not do was to write, that Caesar says they
could. If you kill the druids, you burn the library, including, as you said,
military tactics and tribal history, the 'matter' of Gaul like the 'matter of
Britain' later written in Welsh.

I think some of the best depiction of druids comes from Bernard Cornwell's
sinister magic realism Arthurian series, Winter King, Enemy of God, .... where
he shows them as immensely powerful respected Nature-priests and magicians,
morally neutral as much with the parts of Gaia that have claws and teeth as an
New Agery, and up to their necks in 'spirit fences' of severed heads etc,
something an African witch-doctor with a 'modern' university understanding of
the world. Nikolai Tolstoy's Arthur novel is slightly less gruesome, but
similar.

>
> Salvete, Omnes:
>
> > but religion was tied in:
>
> (...)
>
> > Another religious persecution undertaken by the Roman Republic
> > involved Julius Caesar's conquest of Gaul. Caesar identified the
> > Druids as a source of Celtic hostility to Rome and to Roman
> > civilisation, and accordingly undertook their eradication. He gives
> > a mostly unflattering albeit grudgingly respectful account of the
> > Druids in his Gallic Wars; his account of their human sacrifices
> > seems likely to have been exaggerated. He may have been motivated in
> > part to invade the island of Britain at least in part to eliminate a
> > stronghold of Druidism, and the later Roman author Tacitus gives a
> > dramatic account of an assault on the island of Anglesey, a Druid
> > stronghold.
>
> :-?
>
> I was ironic when I talked about religious war on the conquest of
> Galiae.
>
> Let's see some facts:
>
> From the age of the roman kings to the republican Rome, the only time
> that Roma city has been sieged, defeated, plundered and burned was by
> Gallii.
>
> That defeat was in the imaginery of Roman people during ages: Suplicius,
> the consular tribune that lost the battle for defending Rome, gave his
> name to a deffinition of "suffering and torture", and in modern
> times some Romanic languages keeps the word "suplicio" with that
> meaning.
> The next year, the Pontifex declarated that days (Postridie idus
> Quintiles) as dies atri. Postridie idus quintiles wasn't dies atri before
> the plunder of Rome.
>
> The eigty older and wiser patricians stayed on their curules chairs on
> the forum, waiting for the dead for cleaning the guilt of Rome. Gallii
> thought that they were statues when they arriveds the forum. They were
> killed when one of the Gallii touched M. Papirio's white beard, and
> discovered that they were living beings.
>
> All the moruments, registers, books were destroyied. Most wise men
> died, and the economy colapsed. The most optimistics evaluations says
> that Roma needed 50 years to return to the ecomical and
> political normality. Roma also had to reconquest the whole italic
> peninsulae.
>
> All the Roman strategy and organization of the army changed the following
> years.
>
> The Gallii atacked 30 years later, and atacked again and again until
> Julius Caesar won the Galiae war.
>
> The only exit by land for Roman in that land passed by Gallii land.
>
> Galiae was strategical due to the agrary work that can be done there.
> Grain was scarce and expensive, and Ostia port was saturated.
>
> Gallii is a contraction for Gal Proelium.
>
> Druid religion was practiced in Galia in particular and in the whole
> roman empire as general during centuries, and it can be found druids
> until Teodosius imperator. The prosecution of the druids began with
> Teodosius.
>
> The only druids that were killed on the republic were Gallii's druid.
> The only Gallii druid that were killed was during the war. The druids take
> part actively on the military welfare on celtic tribes. Druid was a celtic
> priest of celtic religion; and in all the places of the republic and the
> empire were celtic were assimilated, druid existed before, during and
> after gallii war.
>
> Druids made a really important role on celtic wellfare, and participated
> on the battlefield operations. A celtic druid was not all this new-age
> stuff that we see on TV, and it is not that Panoramix stuff. The most of
> high-rank gallii druids were also warlords (see Diviciacus, as an
> example). The druids in republic age did not taugh the celtic "how to be
> one with gaia". They taught strategy, tactical wellfare and battlefield
> and weapon techniques. They taught history and myths of the tribe, and
> those that were not warlords worked as ambassors between warlods.
>
> War of Galiae of Julius Caesar is a beatiful piece of Julius Caesar
> propaganda about the heroicity of Julius Caesar.
>
> What makes me to do the follolwing deductions:
>
> On Julius Caesar's time, galii was the geopolitical enemy of Rome.
>
> The area of expansion of Rome passed by Galiae.
>
> The economical and geopolitical interest passed by controling Galiae.
>
> Rome as city has some debts to fix with Galii. Revenge is great.
>
> Julius Caesar has a strong interest on give information about how brave,
> rude and savage the galii were. And roman imaginery also pointed in that
> direction due to the point before. From here come the "horrors" of
> Gallii rites telled by Julius Caesar.
>
> Only were killed druids if they were gauls. Non-gauls druids do not were
> killed, no matter than all the celtics druids practice the same religion.
> After the war, no more gauls druids were killed.
>
> The active part of Gallii druids on welfare explains by itself why Julius
> Caesar didn't liked too much gallii druids: they taught how to fight
> eficienty, were warlords or coordinate and unite different warlords. They
> were the leaders. It is normal that in war times Julius attacked to the
> head of the enemy.
>
> Druid religion was heavily prosecuted by christians (in some parts of
> the former empire, during the begining of the middle age), what means
> that did not dissapear on the empire.
>
> Yours:
>
> Lucius Cornelius Malacitanus
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
</blockquote></BODY>

"God created man and man created God. So is it in the world. Men make
gods and they worship their creations. If would be fitting for the gods to
worship men" - Gospel of Thomas, Logion 85:1-4
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39224 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Calenders
Salvete Omnes,

I find the suggestion of Tiberius Galerius Paulinus (below) to have
much merit. With this sort of cooperation we can do so much more than
if we all try to do things individually.

M. Lucr. Agricola


P.s. Do take care, though, that you not be seen to undermine the state
through formation of a secret society. *Ahem*




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Timothy P. Gallagher"
<spqr753@m...> wrote:
>
> Salve M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
>
>
> Here is an Idea. You could franchise the calendars out. Say I was
willing to invest toward the $3500. I would get the calendars and I
would be able to sell them in say North America. Other Citizens could
get Spain and Portugal, others Italy, or South America ect or by NR
province. What do you think?
>
>
> vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS<mailto:complutensis@g...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 8:56 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Calenders
>
>
> Salve,
>
> the last year the cost was of 3000 euro (3500 US $) aprox.
>
> Vale optime
>
> M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
> PROPRAETOR·HISPANIAE
> SCRIBA·CENSORIS·CFBQ
> SCRIBA·COHORS·APPROBATIONVM
> SCRIBA·MAGISTER·ARANEARIUS
> NOVA·ROMA
> http://commentariola.blogspot.com<http://commentariola.blogspot.com/>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Timothy P. Gallagher
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 2:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Calenders
>
>
> Salve M CVR·COMPLVTENSIS<mailto:complutensis@g...>
>
> How much would it cost?
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS<mailto:complutensis@g...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 8:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Calenders
>
>
> Salvete
>
> Unfortunately, this year, the Provincia Hispania have not
obtained the necessary sponsor to print the calendars for the next year.
>
> Valete
>
> M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
> PROPRAETOR·HISPANIAE
> SCRIBA·CENSORIS·CFBQ
> SCRIBA·COHORS·APPROBATIONVM
> SCRIBA·MAGISTER·ARANEARIUS
> NOVA·ROMA
>
http://commentariola.blogspot.com<http://commentariola.blogspot.com/><http://commentariola.blogspot.com/<http://commentariola.blogspot.com/>>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
> To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 12:47 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Calenders
>
>
> Salvete
>
> Does Provinica Hispania plan on selling calenders again
for the upcoming year?
>
> If so, I (and I am sure many others) would like to buy one
again.
>
> Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group
"Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>>"
on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of
Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>>.

>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group
"Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39225 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Calenders
Amice,

For the benefit of newer citizens, this would be a good chance to
explain the workings of "Dono dare". Could you do it?

M. Lucr. Agricola


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "vespasian72001" <agraham2@s...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
> You wrote:
> > Unfortunately, this year, the Provincia Hispania have not obtained
> the necessary sponsor to print the calendars for the next year.
> Would that be monetary, or would it be an organization TO print the
> calendars?
> If it is monetarysponsorship you need, I urge all here to "Dono Dare"
> ASAP.
> Vale,
>
> Vespasianus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39226 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve Romans

A short time ago we were discussion the numerous reasons given for Rome's fall. At the time I was rereading some of
"Race mixture in the Roman Empire' by Tenney Frank. The recent problems in France and other macro-national events leads be to believe
their may be a great deal of merit to his hypothesis

He writes in part

"This Orientalization of Rome's populace has a more important bearing than is usually accorded it upon the larger question of why the spirit and acts of imperial Rome are totally different from those of the republic. There was a complete change in the temperament!...
There is today a healthy activity in the study of the economic factors that contributed to Rome's decline. But what lay behind and constantly reacted upon all such causes of Rome's disintegration was, after all, to a considerable extent, the fact that the people who had built Rome had given way to a different race. The lack of energy and enterprise, the failure of foresight and common sense, the weakening of moral and political stamina, all were concomitant with the gradual diminution of the stock which, during the earlier days, had displayed these qualities."...

.."The race went under. The legislation of Augustus and his successors, while aiming at preserving the native stock, was of the myopic kind so usual in social lawmaking, and failing to reckon with the real nature of the problem involved, it utterly missed the mark. By combining epigraphically and literary references, a fairly full history of the noble families can be procured, and this reveals a startling inability of such families to perpetuate themselves." ...

"We know, for instance, in Caesar's day of forty-five patricians, only one of whom is represented by posterity when Hadrian came to power. The Aemilsi, Fabii, Claudii. Manlii, Valerii, and all the rest, with the exception of Comelii, have disappeared. Augustus and Claudius raised twenty-five families to the patricate, and all but six disappear before Nerva's reign. Of the families of nearly four hundred senators recorded in 65 A.D. under Nero, all trace of a half is lost by Nerva's day, a generation later. And the records are so full that these statistics may be assumed to represent with a fair degree of accuracy the disappearance of the male stock of the families in question."

"Of course members of the aristocracy were the chief sufferers from the tyranny of the first century, but this havoc was not all wrought by delatores and assassins. The voluntary choice of childlessness accounts largely for the unparalleled condition. This is as far as the records help in this problem, which, despite the silences is probably the most important phase of the whole question of the change of race. Be the causes what they may, the rapid decrease of the old aristocracy and the native stock was clearly concomitant with a twofold increase from below; by a more normal birth-rate of the poor, and the constant manumission of slaves."

The most important point I think he made was

that "to a considerable extent, the fact that the people who had built Rome had given way to a different race."

Do you agree that he was right and If yes why and if not why not?

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39227 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve Tiberi Galeri, et salvete quirites,

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus wrote:

> A short time ago we were discussion the numerous reasons
> given for Rome's fall. At the time I was rereading some of
> "Race mixture in the Roman Empire' by Tenney Frank. The
> recent problems in France and other macro-national events
> leads be to believe their may be a great deal of merit to
> his hypothesis

[snip racist hypothesis]

I appreciate that you provided this in good faith, Pauline, but I must
confess that upon reading it I find it to be the kind of 'scientific
racism' that was developed by Count de Gobineau during the 19th century
which became the justification for all manner of horrors. Your Irish
ancestors and mine were systematically suppressed using these racist
arguments, as I'm sure you know.

It adds nothing to the value of the discussion of either Roma Antiqua or
modern day France to suggest that the problems are based in the racial
differences between one group and another. Social differences have to
do with societal attitudes, values, and beliefs. They don't come
encoded in DNA along with skin color, eye color, nose size, and other
physical characteristics.

Vale, et valete quirites,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39228 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve,

I'm curious. Do you deny that before we had such "melting pot" societies
that race was usually a characteristic of difference cultures? And wouldn't
these different culture also have different values? Ina sense, referring to
race as the cause could be correct if we assume race=culture in this
context.

Vale,
Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia


----- Original Message -----
From: "Gnaeus Equitius Marinus" <gawne@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome


> Salve Tiberi Galeri, et salvete quirites,
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus wrote:
>
>> A short time ago we were discussion the numerous reasons
>> given for Rome's fall. At the time I was rereading some of
>> "Race mixture in the Roman Empire' by Tenney Frank. The
>> recent problems in France and other macro-national events
>> leads be to believe their may be a great deal of merit to
>> his hypothesis
>
> [snip racist hypothesis]
>
> I appreciate that you provided this in good faith, Pauline, but I must
> confess that upon reading it I find it to be the kind of 'scientific
> racism' that was developed by Count de Gobineau during the 19th century
> which became the justification for all manner of horrors. Your Irish
> ancestors and mine were systematically suppressed using these racist
> arguments, as I'm sure you know.
>
> It adds nothing to the value of the discussion of either Roma Antiqua or
> modern day France to suggest that the problems are based in the racial
> differences between one group and another. Social differences have to
> do with societal attitudes, values, and beliefs. They don't come
> encoded in DNA along with skin color, eye color, nose size, and other
> physical characteristics.
>
> Vale, et valete quirites,
>
> -- Marinus
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39229 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve Annia Minucia, et salvete quirites,

annia@... wrote:

> I'm curious. Do you deny that before we had such "melting pot" societies
> that race was usually a characteristic of difference cultures?

I think it's reasonable to say that many different cultures were
composed predominantly of people who shared a common ethnicity.
However, I think it's a mistake to conflate the characteristics of a
particular culture with the genetic heritage of the people in that
culture. A given cultural group perpetuates itself via genes which
carry the genetic coding, and memes which carry the ideas down through
the generations.

> And wouldn't
> these different culture also have different values?

Possibly, but not necessarily. But we can postulate this sort of
variation for the sake of discussion.

> Ina sense, referring to
> race as the cause could be correct if we assume race=culture in this
> context.

But that's just it. Race is NOT culture. Not at all. To mistake the
one for the other is to fall into one of the most egregious errors of
the past. Strictly speaking, we are all of the human race. It is a
flawed interpretation of biology that produced the notion of different
skin colors representing different races, and unfortunately that flawed
idea has permeated the collective consciousness to the point where it
has become generally accepted.

Even by assuming that ethnicity is equal to culture we stray into
dangerous territory. Genetic heritage is not the same as memetic
heritage.

Vale, et valete quirites,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39230 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Tenney Frank
Salve Romans

"[snip racist hypothesis]"

I guess this how we terminate a discussion in Nova Roma.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39231 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 10:06:35PM -0500, Timothy P. Gallagher wrote:
> Salve Romans
>
> "[snip racist hypothesis]"
>
> I guess this how we terminate a discussion in Nova Roma.

To quote a friend of mine, "Yeah, you're being oppressed, and observing
the violence inherent in the system. Seen that flick."

The thing that terminated the discussion - at least on your part - is
your statement above. If you have something interesting to contribute,
there's nobody stopping you. Still. Even after making the above
statement.

I simply note, without pointing any fingers, that it is _much_ easier to
convert the discussion into a soap opera, hurt feelings and all, than
actually *study* the questions on the table, *decide* on their value,
and *argue* for or against their merits. [shrug] We all act according to
our abilities, I guess.


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Qui statuit aliquid parte inaudita altera, aequum licet statuerit.
One who passes sentence on something without having heard the other part isn't
just, even if the sentence is just.
-- Seneca Philosophus, Medea. Cf. "audietur et altera pars."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39232 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve Gnaeus Equitius Marinus


You do both Tenney Frank and myself a disservice when you dismiss out of hand a hypothesis as racist.

Frank himself was quick to point out that

"It would be wholly unfair to pass judgment upon the native qualities of the Oriental without further study, or to accept
the self-complacent slurs of the Romans , who, ignoring certain imaginative and artistic qualities, chose only to
see in them unprincipled and servile egoist."

"There was a complete change in the temperament!..."

If you take a million Romans over time and transplant them to the provinces as colonist.
While others are killed in wars to the point of depopulating Italy and you bring in again over time
hundreds of thousands of slaves from all parts of the empire , people who know servitude and not leadership
then you will over time replace one people with another even if you call both of them Roman.

This is the point I believe he was making.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
















----- Original Message -----
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus<mailto:gawne@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome


Salve Tiberi Galeri, et salvete quirites,

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus wrote:

> A short time ago we were discussion the numerous reasons
> given for Rome's fall. At the time I was rereading some of
> "Race mixture in the Roman Empire' by Tenney Frank. The
> recent problems in France and other macro-national events
> leads be to believe their may be a great deal of merit to
> his hypothesis

[snip racist hypothesis]

I appreciate that you provided this in good faith, Pauline, but I must
confess that upon reading it I find it to be the kind of 'scientific
racism' that was developed by Count de Gobineau during the 19th century
which became the justification for all manner of horrors. Your Irish
ancestors and mine were systematically suppressed using these racist
arguments, as I'm sure you know.

It adds nothing to the value of the discussion of either Roma Antiqua or
modern day France to suggest that the problems are based in the racial
differences between one group and another. Social differences have to
do with societal attitudes, values, and beliefs. They don't come
encoded in DNA along with skin color, eye color, nose size, and other
physical characteristics.

Vale, et valete quirites,

-- Marinus


SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ> Fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA> The fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ>
Roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39233 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-11-13
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve Tiberi Galeri,

Timothy P. Gallagher wrote:

> Salve Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
>
>
> You do both Tenney Frank and myself a disservice when you
> dismiss out of hand a hypothesis as racist.

I'm not dismissing it, I'm simply stating what it is. He uses the term
race throughout, attributing certain things to race. That is racism,
pure and simple. Go look up the French Count I named, and read
something of what he wrote. He thought that cultural qualities were
inherent in people because of their race, that is exactly the argument
that Frank was making in what you posted. It is a pernicious argument,
and one that deserves to be exposed for what it is.

[...]
> If you take a million Romans over time and transplant them
> to the provinces as colonist. While others are killed in wars
> to the point of depopulating Italy and you bring in again over time
> hundreds of thousands of slaves from all parts of the empire ,
> people who know servitude and not leadership then you will over
> time replace one people with another even if you call both of them Roman.
>
> This is the point I believe he was making.

Perhaps it is. If so, then he erred badly in attributing to race those
things which have to do with culture and socialization.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39234 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank
---Galerius Paulinus Quaestor:

I think you owe the Censor an apology. You imply that he curtailed
a discussion when he was merely responding to you as a citizen,
having the same constitutional rights to his opinion as you hold.

He did not. Where is his ex officium edictum calling the discussion
to a halt? Post # please:

If the cat has your tongue, and the response below is the best you
can do to furnish an answer to him, well, that is not *his* fault.
Perhaps it is *you* who is embracing a flimsy hypothesis, and one
which is applicable to the dynamics of 'all' of humanity at one time
or another....not just the Romans.

If you are looking for positive affirmation and 'strokes' for
advocating the mindset you present tonight, then you might take the
discussion to the Boni list....or the list of hyperconservative
hyper-politically motivated persons with a somewhat "Bloody Mary"
mindset in determining the true "Novae Romae".....or whatever the
group as a whole calls themselves nowadays...<shrug>....

All I can suggest.

In either case, I feel that you dealt Equitius Marinus Censor a bad
hand. And I think you should, as a magistrate of the ordinarii,
apologize in good faith....in this forum, where you made such a
misleading implication regarding his words.

Pompeia Minucia Tiberia
Senatrix
Propraetrix Canada Orientalis
Nova Roma


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Timothy P. Gallagher" <spqr753@m...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Romans
>
> "[snip racist hypothesis]"
>
> I guess this how we terminate a discussion in Nova Roma.
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39235 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
C. Equitius Cato Ti. Galerio Paulino Gn. Equitio Marino omnibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Interesting question, actually, Galerius Paulinus, but I think it
fails --- and not simply because it is racism and that (as we
understand it) racism is evil.

Follow Frank's argument in the course of a relatively simple example.
If the cultural and social norms of Roman society were "polluted" by
the displacement of "true Roman stock" with that of the peoples the
Romans conquered, then the social and cultural "norms" of the
resultant population would, by necessity, be polluted as well and, by
definition, inferior.

One of the cultural norms of Roman society was speaking Latin. Latin
was gradually displaced by a mixture of Latin and the native languages
of several ethnic groups of persons conquered by the Romans; as a
result, we have Italian, French, Spanish, Portugese --- the "Romance
(i.e., "from the Roman [Latin]") languages. Would it be correct to
say that the social and cultural institutions of Italy, France,
Portugal or Spain are inherently inferior to those which existed in
the Roman era simply because of the linguistic devolvement from "pure"
Latin?

When you comment on the idea that the people conquered by the Romans
were "people who [knew] servitude and not leadership", you dismiss the
entire military, political, social, economic, and (to use a Roman
word) imperial histories of these slaves: the Egyptians, heirs to the
longest civilization then in existence in the Roman world; the Greeks,
the Persians, the Gauls, the Britons --- all had sophisticated and
intricate histories of military civilization and the arts, both
decorative and scientific. The Romans, as we are well aware, actually
created a whole philisophical ideal out of syncretizing their own
model of civilization with that of their subject peoples in order to
create the best possible model --- and these subject people drew out
of Roman civilization every drop possible for their own benefit.

So, to use a somewhat absurd example, if the Romans had invented the
toothbrush, and its use spread throughout the empire (with the
possible exception of Britain --- no offense intended to our citizens
in Britannia, but c'mon, what HAPPENED there?), and pure Latin was
devolving into a series of geographically-based different languages,
then what you end up with is a vast population brushing their teeth
while speaking a strange mixture of Latin and the local dialect. They
do not lose the ability to brush their teeth because their language is
changing.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39236 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve, Cato, salveteque omnes ...



Toothbrush? Well, until comparatively recent times we barbaric Britons, I
believe, used the end of a chewed twig. However, one can now buy
toothbrushes in the shops! :-)



S Pontius Pilatus Barbatus



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of gaiusequitiuscato
Sent: 14 November 2005 05:18
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome



C. Equitius Cato Ti. Galerio Paulino Gn. Equitio Marino omnibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Interesting question, actually, Galerius Paulinus, but I think it
fails --- and not simply because it is racism and that (as we
understand it) racism is evil.

Follow Frank's argument in the course of a relatively simple example.
If the cultural and social norms of Roman society were "polluted" by
the displacement of "true Roman stock" with that of the peoples the
Romans conquered, then the social and cultural "norms" of the
resultant population would, by necessity, be polluted as well and, by
definition, inferior.

One of the cultural norms of Roman society was speaking Latin. Latin
was gradually displaced by a mixture of Latin and the native languages
of several ethnic groups of persons conquered by the Romans; as a
result, we have Italian, French, Spanish, Portugese --- the "Romance
(i.e., "from the Roman [Latin]") languages. Would it be correct to
say that the social and cultural institutions of Italy, France,
Portugal or Spain are inherently inferior to those which existed in
the Roman era simply because of the linguistic devolvement from "pure"
Latin?

When you comment on the idea that the people conquered by the Romans
were "people who [knew] servitude and not leadership", you dismiss the
entire military, political, social, economic, and (to use a Roman
word) imperial histories of these slaves: the Egyptians, heirs to the
longest civilization then in existence in the Roman world; the Greeks,
the Persians, the Gauls, the Britons --- all had sophisticated and
intricate histories of military civilization and the arts, both
decorative and scientific. The Romans, as we are well aware, actually
created a whole philisophical ideal out of syncretizing their own
model of civilization with that of their subject peoples in order to
create the best possible model --- and these subject people drew out
of Roman civilization every drop possible for their own benefit.

So, to use a somewhat absurd example, if the Romans had invented the
toothbrush, and its use spread throughout the empire (with the
possible exception of Britain --- no offense intended to our citizens
in Britannia, but c'mon, what HAPPENED there?), and pure Latin was
devolving into a series of geographically-based different languages,
then what you end up with is a vast population brushing their teeth
while speaking a strange mixture of Latin and the local dialect. They
do not lose the ability to brush their teeth because their language is
changing.

Valete bene,

Cato








_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39237 From: Caius Curius Saturninus Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: about calendars, I could do them if there is interest
Salvete omnes,

I have seen some mails about that there will not be calendars for
next year produced by Provincia Hispania. I have not read all of the
mails in this discussion and latest digest has not yet arrived to me
so my apologies if this item has already found its solution.

However I and my wife Emilia could do calendars for next year, and if
I get enough positive responsies we will do it. I have been thinking
about A4 or A5 sized calendar with colour photos or drawings of Rome
and Roman themes with Roman and modern dates. I would love to include
information about festivals and such if I can find reliable source
for information on that. The price would be 15 to 30 Euros per
calendar (depending on numerous factors). If the decision is made
quickly then I can promise to be able to send first calendars to
those who pre-order it before January, otherwise during the first
week or two of January. And naturally I would apply position in
equesterian order and even if not getting it still donate appropriate
part of profit to NR.

The most urgent thing is that I need feedback about this. If you
would be willing to buy one or could help with e.g. research about
the festivals and such additional information or have anything to say
about the idea, please send me private email or continue discussion
at this list if you like.

Valete,

Caius Curius Saturninus

Tribunus Plebis
Propraetor Provinciae Thules
Procurator Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org
gsm: +358-50-3315279
fax: +358-9-8754751





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39238 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: about calendars, I could do them if there is interest
Splendid Idea, Ill buy!
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<c.curius@...> wrote:
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I have seen some mails about that there will not be
calendars for
> next year produced by Provincia Hispania. I have not
read all of the
> mails in this discussion and latest digest has not
yet arrived to me
> so my apologies if this item has already found its
solution.
>
> However I and my wife Emilia could do calendars for
next year, and if
> I get enough positive responsies we will do it. I
have been thinking
> about A4 or A5 sized calendar with colour photos or
drawings of Rome
> and Roman themes with Roman and modern dates. I
would love to include
> information about festivals and such if I can find
reliable source
> for information on that. The price would be 15 to 30
Euros per
> calendar (depending on numerous factors). If the
decision is made
> quickly then I can promise to be able to send first
calendars to
> those who pre-order it before January, otherwise
during the first
> week or two of January. And naturally I would apply
position in
> equesterian order and even if not getting it still
donate appropriate
> part of profit to NR.
>
> The most urgent thing is that I need feedback about
this. If you
> would be willing to buy one or could help with e.g.
research about
> the festivals and such additional information or
have anything to say
> about the idea, please send me private email or
continue discussion
> at this list if you like.
>
> Valete,
>
> Caius Curius Saturninus
>
> Tribunus Plebis
> Propraetor Provinciae Thules
> Procurator Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua
et Nova
>
> e-mail: c.curius@...
> www.academiathules.org
> gsm: +358-50-3315279
> fax: +358-9-8754751
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39239 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: about calendars, I could do them if there is interest
M. Lucretius Agricola C Curio Saturnino S.P.D.


Why would you want to go to all that work? It sounds to me like
citizens in Hispania have everything but the backing. Why not bring
some funds to the table and ask to join them? I would wager it would
save lots of time and work.


It sounds to me like the calendar enjoyed a good bit of popularity. I
see that it takes some money to get the work done, so why don't we see
a group getting together to fund the venture and keep it going? It
seems that it may work for other things. It is getting late but it is
not yet too late.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Caius Curius Saturninus
<c.curius@a...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I have seen some mails about that there will not be calendars for
> next year produced by Provincia Hispania. I have not read all of the
> mails in this discussion and latest digest has not yet arrived to me
> so my apologies if this item has already found its solution.
>
> However I and my wife Emilia could do calendars for next year, and if
> I get enough positive responsies we will do it. I have been thinking
> about A4 or A5 sized calendar with colour photos or drawings of Rome
> and Roman themes with Roman and modern dates. I would love to include
> information about festivals and such if I can find reliable source
> for information on that. The price would be 15 to 30 Euros per
> calendar (depending on numerous factors). If the decision is made
> quickly then I can promise to be able to send first calendars to
> those who pre-order it before January, otherwise during the first
> week or two of January. And naturally I would apply position in
> equesterian order and even if not getting it still donate appropriate
> part of profit to NR.
>
> The most urgent thing is that I need feedback about this. If you
> would be willing to buy one or could help with e.g. research about
> the festivals and such additional information or have anything to say
> about the idea, please send me private email or continue discussion
> at this list if you like.
>
> Valete,
>
> Caius Curius Saturninus
>
> Tribunus Plebis
> Propraetor Provinciae Thules
> Procurator Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
>
> e-mail: c.curius@a...
> www.academiathules.org
> gsm: +358-50-3315279
> fax: +358-9-8754751
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39240 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salvete Omnes.


Poor Tenney Frank. He followed science as it was understood in his
day. He lived just before Ashley Montagu (and many others following)
called the idea of "race" into question.

I hope many will take up Stephen J. Gould's excellent and
non-specialist "The Mismeasure of Man" for a nice run down on the
history of the idea of race and why it is now a discredited notion.

Where does that leave poor Tenney Frank? If he had not been burdened
with this notion of "race" he might have been able to talk about
culture groups.

M. Lucretius Agricola


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Timothy P. Gallagher"
<spqr753@m...> wrote:
>
> Salve Romans
>
> A short time ago we were discussion the numerous reasons given for
Rome's fall. At the time I was rereading some of
> "Race mixture in the Roman Empire' by Tenney Frank. The recent
problems in France and other macro-national events leads be to believe
> their may be a great deal of merit to his hypothesis
>
> He writes in part
>
> "This Orientalization of Rome's populace has a more important
bearing than is usually accorded it upon the larger question of why
the spirit and acts of imperial Rome are totally different from those
of the republic. There was a complete change in the temperament!...
> There is today a healthy activity in the study of the economic
factors that contributed to Rome's decline. But what lay behind and
constantly reacted upon all such causes of Rome's disintegration was,
after all, to a considerable extent, the fact that the people who had
built Rome had given way to a different race. The lack of energy and
enterprise, the failure of foresight and common sense, the weakening
of moral and political stamina, all were concomitant with the gradual
diminution of the stock which, during the earlier days, had displayed
these qualities."...
>
> .."The race went under. The legislation of Augustus and his
successors, while aiming at preserving the native stock, was of the
myopic kind so usual in social lawmaking, and failing to reckon with
the real nature of the problem involved, it utterly missed the mark.
By combining epigraphically and literary references, a fairly full
history of the noble families can be procured, and this reveals a
startling inability of such families to perpetuate themselves." ...
>
> "We know, for instance, in Caesar's day of forty-five patricians,
only one of whom is represented by posterity when Hadrian came to
power. The Aemilsi, Fabii, Claudii. Manlii, Valerii, and all the rest,
with the exception of Comelii, have disappeared. Augustus and Claudius
raised twenty-five families to the patricate, and all but six
disappear before Nerva's reign. Of the families of nearly four hundred
senators recorded in 65 A.D. under Nero, all trace of a half is lost
by Nerva's day, a generation later. And the records are so full that
these statistics may be assumed to represent with a fair degree of
accuracy the disappearance of the male stock of the families in
question."
>
> "Of course members of the aristocracy were the chief sufferers from
the tyranny of the first century, but this havoc was not all wrought
by delatores and assassins. The voluntary choice of childlessness
accounts largely for the unparalleled condition. This is as far as the
records help in this problem, which, despite the silences is probably
the most important phase of the whole question of the change of race.
Be the causes what they may, the rapid decrease of the old aristocracy
and the native stock was clearly concomitant with a twofold increase
from below; by a more normal birth-rate of the poor, and the constant
manumission of slaves."
>
> The most important point I think he made was
>
> that "to a considerable extent, the fact that the people who had
built Rome had given way to a different race."
>
> Do you agree that he was right and If yes why and if not why not?
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39241 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salvete omnes,

I did some reading today and came across quite a number of articles
on this subject. I couldn't help bumping into some sites that
initially looked interesting but I quickly realized they were more
of the Nordic Aryan white power sites trying to blame Rome's
downfall on race mixing etc. Silly since the original Romans and
Greeks of the Mediterranean area, not to mention Egypt and
Mesopotamian civilizations before were most likely not your blue
eyed blonds who were, in many cases, far behind technically. Talk
about shooting yourself in the foot! Be that as it may, I came
across the articles below and conclude that yes, there were a lot of
cultural and ethnic differences and problems but they certainly do
not seem to be the same sort of issues based on Social Darwinism and
purity of one particular race over another, ie there were cultural
differences, resentments over differing religions and customs but
physical traits and appearances were not the issues.

The multicultural world was first unified in language and commerce
by Alexander The Great and though it split apart you still had Greek
as the first universal language as well as great commerce
connections making it easier for Roman in roads. Personally, I
conclude Rome became what she was and lasted the longest of any
empire because of her multicultural flexibility and eventual
granting of citizenship to all people who so desired in her empire.
Though she had many faults and problems, overall she must have been
a much better place to live compared to the worlds outside her
borders that in her last few hundred years too many other cultures
were kicking the gates of their hinges in order to get in; in short
a little too much immigration to fast may have been one of the
multitude of problems discussed before but certainly not the gene
pool:


From Professer J. William Larkin
A. Race and Race Relations in First Century Context

1. Racial/ Ethnic Distinctions.
"Racial distinctions based on primarily physical characteristics do
not seem to predominate in first century thought. The
term "Ethiopian" was used to describe the 'Burnt Faced" Men of
Africa and India (Strabo, Geography, 2: 3: 8; cf. the less
common "Niger" Ac 13: 1). As will be noted, however, differences in
physical characteristics were observed and explanations sought. Both
for the Jew and the Greek the basic distinction among human beings
was ethnic. Beginning with an ethnocentric perspective these two
groups classified the rest of mankind in a category over against
themselves. If one were not a Greek he was a Barbarian. If one were
not a Jew he was a Gentile (sometimes the term Greek was used).
To be a Greek was to be an adherent of Greek culture. Either by
descent, or at least by language and civilized manner of life one
identified as a Greek lived within the sphere of the culture of
Mediterranean lands. These had during the Hellenistic period been
essentially influenced by the Greek tongue and civilization. Thus by
the first century the term could refer to the Hellenistic
inhabitants of the Roman empire. By contrast, the Barbarian was one
who spoke a strange language, i. e. one other than Greek and
unintelligible to a Greek (Homer, 11. 2: 867; Strabo, 14: 2: 28; cf.
1 Cor 14: 11). Therefore, he was of a strange race, geo-graphically
and ethnographically foreign to the Greek. In classical times Egypt
and Persia were the Barbarians. As Hellenization progressed and the
Roman empire expanded the Barbarians became a term restricted to the
peoples on the frontiers of Hellenistic and Roman civilization.
To be Jewish was to be by descent a son of Abraham and thus part of
a divinely chosen people. To be a Gentile was to be other than a
Jew. The term translated from the Greek as "Gentile" has a very
general meaning "mass, host, a multitude bound by the same manners,
customs or other distinctive features" (TNDT 2: 369).
The ancients did make further ethnic distinctions. The Greeks would
divide the Barbarians as well as themselves into various ethnic
groupings which were normally labelled according to the location or
language of the people. Beginning with Greece as the center of the
inhabited world and understanding earth's land mass as surrounded by
water, the ancient Greeks identified four peoples as inhabiting the
boundaries of earth. To the west were the Celts; to the north the
Scythians; to the east the Indians (East Ethiopians); and to the
south the Ethiopians (Strabo, 1: 2: 28).
2. Racial/ Ethnic Prejudice.
In classical times the Greeks had a strong ethnic pride which
translated into prejudice against the Barbarian. Aristotle quotes
approvingly from Euripides the sentiment that it is reasonable for
Greeks to rule over Barbarians, but not Barbarians over Greeks, for
Barbarians are by nature slaves but Greeks free men (Aristotle,
Politics 1: 2 p. 1252b8). Such prejudice continued even as
Hellenization progressed so that Diogenes Laertes (3 rd A. D.; 1: 7:
33) still reports Thales' prayer of thanksgiving to Good Fortune
that he was born a man and not a beast, a male and not a female, a
Greek and not a Barbarian (cf. R. Meir (b. Men. 43b) threefold
thanksgiving that he is not Gentile, brutish man or a woman).
Barbarians then were prejudicially understood as wild, crude, fierce
and uncivilized.
This was especially true of the Scythians. These Iranian nomads had
swept down from the South Russian steppes in 700 BC and ravaged
Mediterranean states as far as Egypt. They were part of the Medo-
Babylonian coalition which overthrew Assyria. They had a reputation
of being the lowest of the Barbarians. Greek verbs constructed from
their name were used to describe scalping fallen victims, drinking
immoderately or drinking unmixed wine; being crude in speech or
matters of love (TDNT 7: 447-450).
Prejudice against the Ethiopians (it should be remembered that this
is a general term referring to any peoples living in the region to
the far south of Greece) seemed to center on their manner of life.
The physical features were noted but normally not in a pejorative
way (Strabo, 3: 8: 2-3; but cf. 15: 1: 24 where Onesicritus'
description is cited: the sun has discoloured their bodies with a
murky dark bloom and curled their hair fusing it by unincreasable
forms of fire; cf. "Niger" Ac 13: 1 a Latin nickname for Simeon
probably because of dark complexion, F. F. Bruce, Acts, 260). Strabo
concludes that they have a savage spirit not so much in temperament
but in their ways of living. They are squalid all over their bodies
and have long nails. They have shrill voices and are as far removed
from human kindness to one another. Indeed, they cultivate none of
the practices of civilized life as are found among the rest of
mankind. This is the basic historical evidence for the attitudes
toward black persons in ancient times.
The prejudice of Jews against Gentiles was just as strong, if not
stronger, in the first century. The Jew's ethnic identity was
grounded in the monotheism of a God who has called one to be a holy
people, forsaking the idolatry of the Gentiles. A powerful mixture
of fear of contamination and pride of divinely favored position
works in the Jewish mind to create a prejudicial disdain for, even
revulsion at, the idolatrously unclean Gentile. Of course, the
Gentile's disdain of the Jew's imageless monotheism heightened the
antipathy (Apollonius Molon in Jas. Apion 2: 15). In Palestine, the
half-breed Samaritan with his irregular worship also experienced the
prejudice of the Jew.
Racial/ ethnic prejudice was a definite factor in ancient life and
thought. Relations among the ethnic groups in an ever expanding
Roman empire was a problem to be constantly addressed. "

QSP- They are not sure about the full ramifications of race in Rome.
Initially citizenship was open only to Romans and not even other
Italians. Gradually citizenship was open to other Italians and
eventually to people throughout the multicultural Empire. This
included Gauls, Brits, Spanish, and peoples from the East in
Anatolia, Syria, and Egypt. The Empire included North Africa, with
probable black populations. There were some black slaves, but as in
Greece there were no racial requirements to slavery; equal
opportunity to be sure for many slaves were of Italian stock; for
example wars with the Celts resulted in large numbers of blond, blue-
eyed slaves.

USU 1320: History and Civilization

Race, Multiculturalism, Decline
"Increasing pressure from peoples outside the Empire, the so-called
barbarians, had compelled the Romans in later antiquity to let more
and more foreigners inside their state. Since most of these spoke a
language based on Common Germanic, the Romans referred to them
collectively as Germans, even though they represented a wide array
of nations and cultures. These newly adopted resident aliens were
assigned to work farms or conscripted into the Roman army in numbers
so large that the late Latin word for "soldier" came to be barbarus
("barbarian"). And where these barbarians met resistance, they
sneaked or pushed their way inside the Empire, and in such a
profusion that Rome was fast turning into a nation of immigrants.
Not that it hadn't actually been that for centuries, only by late
antiquity the truth that despite its name Rome was, in fact, a
multicultural enterprise had become undeniable. The pretense of
a "Roman" Rome had worn so thin it was impossible to maintain the
illusion, for instance, that everyone in the Empire could speak—or
even wanted to speak—Latin, the Romans' native tongue. Furthermore,
it had been ages since any emperor had even bothered to pretend his
lineage could be traced back to some ancestor who had arrived with
Aeneas in Italy, an invented history which was beginning to look
rather silly when Spaniards and North Africans had been steering the
Empire for decades. The stark truth was that by the fifth century CE—
and indeed for many years before that—a succession of dynamic and
capable foreigners coming from all ends of the Empire had kept Rome
on its feet and these men were as "Roman" as anyone born or bred in
the capital. Barbarians were, and had been for a long time, guarding
and feeding the Empire, which made it all the more difficult to
claim they shouldn't also be running it. While three centuries
earlier the Roman satirist Juvenal had lamented, "I can't stand a
Greek Rome," now Rome wasn't merely Greek. It was Dacian and
Egyptian and Syrian and, most of all, more German by the day.
Thus, the sort of change which Rome had undergone—and which implies
per se a certain trajectory into the future—was all too clear: from
a local stronghold in Italy, to a multinational power, to the only
superpower in the known world, to a globalized conglomerate of many
different peoples. Even if Romans still held the title to the Empire
and affected superiority over the barbarians managing their domain,
Roman possession of the lands around the Mediterranean Sea was, for
the most part, only on paper. The reality was that the state was
jointly owned, a participatory experiment which was by then
maintained with the sweat and blood of many nations—and there were
even more who would have liked to sign up as "Roman" but they
couldn't get in.
This begs the question, then, why so many foreigners lived—and even
more wanted to live—in Rome. Why did barbarians in such numbers
press to invade an empire in which they were treated as second-class
citizens no matter how hard they worked and collaborated? The answer
is easy. The Roman Empire in that day was a far safer place to live
and offered much better accommodations than the wild world outside
its borders. Roads and aqueducts and baths and amphitheaters and
even taxes look good when one is gazing in from outside where
poverty, blood-feuds, disease and frost reign supreme—the mild
Mediterranean climate of southern Europe cannot be discounted as a
factor in the barbarians' desire to infiltrate sunny Rome—but an
even more impressive reason was lurking beyond the borders of the
Empire, something anyone would want to avoid if possible: Huns!"
USU 1320: History and Civilization

Regards,
Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39242 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII - QUIZ - DAY 4 - Answers
Salve

Again, only two citizens took part to round 4 of the quiz.

10) Several methods: A big round hole at the centre of the dome serves
as make teh whole dome lighter and as a compression ring. Lighter
material (pumice) was used in the higher stepped rings, which are even
more thin than the lower ones, made of heavier material (basalt). the
internal surface of the dome presents coffers, making again the
structure lighter, and there are arches along the top of the rotunda
that discharge the weight down.

11) Fossa

12) Podium and etruscan model.

Valete,

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis Iterum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39243 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII - QUIZ - DAY 5 - Ranking
Salve

Current ranking by numbe of correct answers:

9 - Tita Artoria Marcella
8 - Titus Iulius Sabinus
1 - Quintus Suetonius Paulinus

valete

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis Iterum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39244 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII - QUIZ - DAY 5 - Various
Salve

Last questions! Answers within midnight, Rome time.

13) Carmentes, who or what indicates this term, and how was
he/she/it/them referred to regards to prophecy?

14) Out of Porta Trigemina, next to the Emporium, what important
building had its own place?

15) what was the name of the trumpet call that called the Comitia
centuriata to order?

Valete,

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis Iterum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39245 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salvete omnes.

Since even in the time of the republic there was a considerable
amount of huffing and puffing about the inclusion of new men in the
Senate and objections to the extension of citizenship to Italians,
never mind Gauls, Britons, Spaniards, Greeks etc, the concept of a
Roman "race" is in error.

What consitituted a Roman? How many generations had to have elapsed
before one could be considered Roman? Could only Latins become
Roman? Could Italians? Was a roman only someone who had been born in
the city of Rome? The answers of course would have differed widely
depending on the century those questions were posed in and who was
answering.

Cultural changes, economics, politics and religion played a role in
the evolution of a Roman from a citizen farmer dwelling outside the
walls of republican Rome to a provincial in Gaul descended from
barbarians of the Empire, not "race".

Valete
Gnaeus Iulius Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola"
<wm_hogue@y...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes.
>
>
> Poor Tenney Frank. He followed science as it was understood in his
> day. He lived just before Ashley Montagu (and many others
following)
> called the idea of "race" into question.
>
> I hope many will take up Stephen J. Gould's excellent and
> non-specialist "The Mismeasure of Man" for a nice run down on the
> history of the idea of race and why it is now a discredited notion.
>
> Where does that leave poor Tenney Frank? If he had not been
burdened
> with this notion of "race" he might have been able to talk about
> culture groups.
>
> M. Lucretius Agricola
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Timothy P. Gallagher"
> <spqr753@m...> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Romans
> >
> > A short time ago we were discussion the numerous reasons given
for
> Rome's fall. At the time I was rereading some of
> > "Race mixture in the Roman Empire' by Tenney Frank. The recent
> problems in France and other macro-national events leads be to
believe
> > their may be a great deal of merit to his hypothesis
> >
> > He writes in part
> >
> > "This Orientalization of Rome's populace has a more important
> bearing than is usually accorded it upon the larger question of why
> the spirit and acts of imperial Rome are totally different from
those
> of the republic. There was a complete change in the temperament!...
> > There is today a healthy activity in the study of the economic
> factors that contributed to Rome's decline. But what lay behind and
> constantly reacted upon all such causes of Rome's disintegration
was,
> after all, to a considerable extent, the fact that the people who
had
> built Rome had given way to a different race. The lack of energy
and
> enterprise, the failure of foresight and common sense, the
weakening
> of moral and political stamina, all were concomitant with the
gradual
> diminution of the stock which, during the earlier days, had
displayed
> these qualities."...
> >
> > .."The race went under. The legislation of Augustus and his
> successors, while aiming at preserving the native stock, was of the
> myopic kind so usual in social lawmaking, and failing to reckon
with
> the real nature of the problem involved, it utterly missed the
mark.
> By combining epigraphically and literary references, a fairly full
> history of the noble families can be procured, and this reveals a
> startling inability of such families to perpetuate themselves." ...
> >
> > "We know, for instance, in Caesar's day of forty-five patricians,
> only one of whom is represented by posterity when Hadrian came to
> power. The Aemilsi, Fabii, Claudii. Manlii, Valerii, and all the
rest,
> with the exception of Comelii, have disappeared. Augustus and
Claudius
> raised twenty-five families to the patricate, and all but six
> disappear before Nerva's reign. Of the families of nearly four
hundred
> senators recorded in 65 A.D. under Nero, all trace of a half is
lost
> by Nerva's day, a generation later. And the records are so full
that
> these statistics may be assumed to represent with a fair degree of
> accuracy the disappearance of the male stock of the families in
> question."
> >
> > "Of course members of the aristocracy were the chief sufferers
from
> the tyranny of the first century, but this havoc was not all
wrought
> by delatores and assassins. The voluntary choice of childlessness
> accounts largely for the unparalleled condition. This is as far as
the
> records help in this problem, which, despite the silences is
probably
> the most important phase of the whole question of the change of
race.
> Be the causes what they may, the rapid decrease of the old
aristocracy
> and the native stock was clearly concomitant with a twofold
increase
> from below; by a more normal birth-rate of the poor, and the
constant
> manumission of slaves."
> >
> > The most important point I think he made was
> >
> > that "to a considerable extent, the fact that the people who had
> built Rome had given way to a different race."
> >
> > Do you agree that he was right and If yes why and if not why
not?
> >
> > Vale
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39246 From: lucius_fidelius Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Salvete Omnes! LOL

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Santo Orcero <irbis@o...>
wrote:

> Druid religion was heavily prosecuted by christians (in some
parts of
> the former empire, during the begining of the middle age), what
means
> that did not dissapear on the empire.
>
>
> Yours:
>
> Lucius Cornelius Malacitanus

According to the BBC website at
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/timelines/wales/druids.shtml --
"When the druids of Anglesey were attacked by the Romans in AD 61,
their altars, according to Tacitus, 'were drenched with the blood of
prisoners'. As the Romans considered druidism to be a nationalistic
religion underpinning British resistance to the Empire, they were
determined to suppress it."

They date Druidism to 61AD, very much short of the middle ages
according to Malacitanus' deductions- which can led me to my own
deductions- that the BBC is conspiring to protect the identity of the
real culprit- King Arthur whom everyone knows from the cartoons and
novels is a tyrant from the middle ages who unified Britain under his
thumb! Those poor humble Druids with their leafy glades, pacifism,
blood-drenched altars and horrific wickermen.

Actually, that wasn't my deduction- which was something more along
the lines of there being no end to fiction once one's invested enough
of oneself in it.

Valete,

L. Fidelius Graecus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39247 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve Romans

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote in part

"It adds nothing to the value of the discussion of either Roma Antiqua or modern day France to suggest that the problems are based in the racial
differences between one group and another. Social differences have to
do with societal attitudes, values, and beliefs. They don't come
encoded in DNA along with skin color, eye color, nose size, and other
physical characteristics."

It was not my intent to "repeat... a racist agenda" if that is what T. Frank views are. I was interested in what he had to say in that if you physically replace one group of people with an other, over time, you will get different ways of doing and thinking about how the world should work. It was not my intent to label one as better or worse but just different.

I apologize if this discussion in anyway insulted anybody. It was not my intent and I will now drop it.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39248 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: LUDI CIRCENSIS Subscribe to Chariot Races
G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana C. Curio Saturnino SPD.

SPANDEX IS BACK!

My imported Auriga, Spandex the Vandal, performed well
in his first entry into the Roman Circus. Although he
did not win, he learned a great deal. After his promotion
to Master of Horse, he began to develop ways to protect
his horses from dirty tactics, such as the vicious slashing
one of his horses received in the last race.

I hope I have given you the information you need, and
that you can use my entry.

Thank you for making these games possible. Spandex has
been eager to race again.

Vale bene in pace Deorum.

G. Aurelia Falconsi Silvana

HERE ARE THE PARTICIPANT DETAILS:

A. NAME OF OWNER: Gaia Aurelia Falconis Silvana

B. NAME OF DRIVER: Spandex

c. NAME OF CHARIOT: Velociraptor

D. (1) TACTICS FOR QUARTER FINALS
Tactic (A) To support a constant pace
Velociraptor is a strong, battle-hardened team.
Spandex will set a rapid pace, but a very steady
pace, keeping out of trouble and lulling his
competitors into thinking he is humbled by his
previous loss and afraid to take risks. He knows
his horses are faster than most, and they can sustain
a long run at a fast pace, while the other teams wear
each other out competing.

[I am not sure I understand the (complicated) instructions,
but if possible for 2 tactics in one race, then in the last
lap, Spandex will "hurry in the straight line",(Tactic F)
unleashing Velociraptor to run with a gait so smooth they
look like a single horse, speeding ahead of the other horses
at the last minute.)

DEFENSE AGAINST DIRTY ACTIONS:
Because one of his horses was viciously slashed in the
last race,Team Velociraptor now wears protective
face-pieces of boiled leather. When dried, this leather
face-armor is very strong, but light and easy for the
horses to wear.
AMOUNT SPENT ON THIS DEFENSE: None. This was Spandex's
own invention as Master of Horse to Domus Aurelia Falconis.

(2) TACTICS FOR SEMI-FINALS:
Tactic (B): To pass the curves close to the "spina"
of the circus.
Spandex uses this tactic to once more confuse his
rivals. In his first exposure to Roman chariot racing,
he was well-known to keep to the *outside* of the track,
using the superior stamina of Velociraptor to make up
for the extra distance involved. He knows he can control
Velociraptor even in a close-packed knot of chariots,
and they have the courage needed to keep their confidence.
They also now have some extra protection on their faces
(that leather armor).

DEFENSE AGAINST DIRTY TACTICS:
Spandex's rival was nearly killed, and Spandex and
Velociraptor themselves narrowly escaped, when a weakened
axle on the rival's chariot caused that chariot to break up
in the final lap of the race. Knowing that running close
to the spina is dangerous, and with that memory, Spandex
has spent considerable time reinforcing the axle of his
racing chariot.
AMOUNT SPENT ON THIS DEFENSE: Nothing. This work was
done as part of Spandex's duties as Master of Horse.
He has alot of experience as a blacksmith in his
home country.

E. TACTICS FOR THE FINALS
IF ONLY ONE TACTIC IS ALLOWED,
Tactic E: To push the rivals to the wall of circus.
This is again to confuse his rivals. In the finals,
Spandex does the opposite of what he did in the semi-finals.
As in his very first Roman competition, he will rely on the
strength and great hearts of his horses to make up for
the extra distance caused by swerving outward. Besides,
his rivals will have to travel even furtherne?

IF MULTIPLE TACTICS ARE ALLOWED:
To begin, Tactic C: to support a constant pace.
Slower than in the quarter finals, so his rivals think
Velociraptor is getting tired of all these racing days.

Half-way into the race, switch to Tactic B: pass the
curves close to the spina, following very close and
pushing the team ahead of him away from the spina.

Last turns: Tactic F: To hurry in the straight lines.
Spandex took alot of risks in the middle of this race,
even with his reinforced axle. Now he takes the last
two turns further out from the spina, but uncorks
Velociraptor to full speed in the straight lines
("straightaways"), being very prudent. He won't lose
his leading position by taking an unnecessary risk
just before the goal.

DEFENSE AGAINST DIRTY ACTIONS:
To a driver who attempts to clash wheels with his chariot,
Spandex carries a very tough rawhide rope of a little more
than one chariot-width, with weights at each end. He will
drop this around the axle of a chariot attempting to collide
with his wheels. The weights wrap the axle of the rival and
foul the wheel on one side, perhaps breaking spokes, but
certainly making it difficult for the driver to control
direction.

AMOUNT PAID FOR DEFENSE: 2 sesterces to the Ethiopian
slave Spandex met in the tavern, and who showed him this
simple native Ethiopian weapon (unrecognized as a weapon
by Roman Praetorians).

F. FACTIO: G R E E N ( is this Veneta?)

G. DIRTY ACTIONS: Sabotage of a chariot
(semi-finals only)
In his first race in Rome, Factio Russato had no entrants,
and no one to cheer for. The auriga of L. Vitellius
Triarius was responsible for lashing Spandex's horses,
and then nearly killing them all when it broke apart at
high speed. Factio Russsato fans supported Spandex when
he leaped clear, and went immediately to care for his
bleeding team. So we have formed an alliance with
Facto Russato (if there are any Russato entries this time).

Neither our Factio (Green) nor Russato would ever harm the
horses, but we have bought a poor slave in Triarus's camp.
When Triarus's auriga is due to race, this slave is one of
the helpers to prepare the chariot. In particular,
he applies fresh grease to the axle. In this case, the
grease contains small bits of sand, which will cause the
axle to overheat at high speed and seize, first slowing
and then bringing the chariot to a screeching halt with
its axle smoking.

AMOUNT SPENT: purchase price of the slave, 40 sesterces,
paid by Spandex. Immediately after sabotaging the chariot,
the slave will disappear into one of the households of
Factio Russato, which pays in risk of discovery what Spandex
paid for in cash.

NOTE: If it is not possible to act with Russato, Spandex will
act alone, giving the slave as a gift to the tavern-keeper
where he met the Ethiopian (he of the weighted rawhide weapon)

H. DEFENSE AGAINST DIRTY ACTIONS:
Noted above in each round of quarter-finals, semi-finals
and finals.
Plus: 30 sesterces to pay for a guard to keep constant
watch around Velociraptor in the stables and on the way
to/from the circus in the finals.
28 sesterces reserved to buy wine to celebrate winning
the LUDI CIRCENSIS.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39249 From: David Santo Orcero Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Salvete, Omnes!

> They date Druidism to 61AD, very much short of the middle ages
> according to Malacitanus' deductions- which can led me to my own
> deductions- that the BBC is conspiring to protect the identity of the
> real culprit- King Arthur whom everyone knows from the cartoons and
> novels is a tyrant from the middle ages who unified Britain under his
> thumb! Those poor humble Druids with their leafy glades, pacifism,
> blood-drenched altars and horrific wickermen.

According to Wikipedia, topic druid, section Late Druidic survivals in
Flanders:


-----------------------------------------------

The people of Flanders and the Low Countries remained pagan as late as the
7th century CE, when Saint Eligius travelled from Antwerp to Frisia,
preaching and converting them to Christianity. One of the best glimpses of
late Druidic practices comes from the Vita of Eligius written by saint
Ouen, his contemporary and companion. Ouen drew together the familiar
admonitions of Eligius to the pagans in Flanders. "It does not represent
anything he said in a particular day in order" Ouen cautioned, "but is a
digest of the precepts which he taught the people at all times."



Eligius in his sermons denounced "sacrilegious pagan customs." The
following excerpted quotes from Ouen's Vita of Eligius are instructive,
for the negative description they offer of some late druidic practices in
Flanders:


"For no cause or infirmity should you consult magicians, diviners,
sorcerers or incantators, or presume to question them."
"Do not observe auguries or violent sneezing or pay attention to any
little birds singing along the road. If you are distracted on the road or
at any other work, make the sign of the cross and say your Sunday prayers
with faith and devotion and nothing inimical can hurt you."
"No Christian should be concerned about which day he leaves home or which
day he returns, because God has made all days. No influence attaches to
the first work of the day or the [phase of the] moon; nothing is ominous
or ridiculous about the Calends of January [what we would call New Year's
Day ].
"[Do not] make vetulas,*, little deer or iotticos or set tables [for the
house-elf, compare Puck] at night or exchange New Years' gifts or supply
superfluous drinks [a Yule custom]."
Vetula, a little figure of the Old Woman. A Roman would have equated her
with Hecate, but precisely who the Old Woman was and what she meant in the
pagan Low Countries cannot be determined.

"No Christian gives credence to impurity or sits in incantation, because
the work is diabolic. No Christian on the feast of Saint John* or the
solemnity of any other saint performs solestitia [summer solstice rites]
or dancing or leaping or diabolical chants."
The Christian summer solstice feast of Saint John the Baptist is still
celebrated with bonfires on June 24th, though the precession of the
equinoxes has shifted the actual equinox forward in the calendar. See
entry Midsummer.

"No Christian should presume to invoke the name of a demon, not Neptune or
Orcus* or Diana or Minerva or Geniscus or believe in these inept beings in
any way. No one should observe Jove's day in idleness without holy
festivities not in May or any other time, not days of larvae** or mice or
any day but Sunday. No Christian should make or render any devotion to the
gods of the trivium, where three roads meet [cf. Hecate], to the fanes or
the rocks, or springs or groves or corners."
Orcus, a chthonic Etruscan/Roman god of the underworld, who enforced the
sacredness of oaths and avenged the broken word. (An essay on
Hades/Orcus.)

Larvae ("malignant spirits") in this Latin text more specifically refer to
the Roman Feast of the Lemures, propitiating the dead, rather than to the
Celtic propitiation, which was at Samhain.

"None should presume to hang any phylacteries* from the neck of man nor
beast, even if they are made by priests and it is said that they contain
holy things and divine scripture, because there is no remedy of Christ in
these things but only the devil's poison."
Gregory of Tours set great store by phylacteries.

"None should presume to make lustrations or incantations with herbs, or to
pass cattle through a hollow tree or ditch because this is to consecrate
them to the devil. No woman should presume to hang amber from her neck or
call upon Minerva or other ill-starred beings in their weaving or dyeing
but in all works give thanks only to Christ and confide in the power of
his name with all your hearts. None should presume to shout when the moon
is obscured, for by God's order eclipses happen at certain times. Nor
should they fear the new moon or abandon work because of it. For God made
the moon for this, to mark time and temper the darkness of night, not
impede work nor make men mad as the foolish imagine, who believe lunatics
are invaded by demons from the moon. None should call the sun or moon lord
or swear by them because they are God's creatures and they serve the needs
of men by God's order."
"No one should tell fate or fortune or horoscopes by them as those do who
believe that a person must be what he was born to be."
"Above all, should any infirmity occur, do not seek incantators or
diviners or sorcerers or magicians, do not use diabolic phylacteries
through springs and groves or crossroads. But let the invalid confide
solely in the mercy of God and take the body and blood of Christ with
faith and devotion and ask the church faithfully for blessing and oil,
with which he might anoint his body in the name of Christ and, according
to the apostle, "the prayer of faith will save the infirm and the Lord
will relieve him."
"Diabolical games and dancing or chants of the gentiles will be forbidden.
No Christian will do them because he thus makes himself pagan. Nor is it
right that diabolical canticles should proceed from a Christian mouth
where the sacrament of Christ is placed, which it becomes always to praise
God. Therefore, brothers, spurn all inventions of the enemy with all your
heart and flee these sacrileges with all horror. Venerate no creature
beyond God and his saints. Shun springs and arbors which they call sacred.
You are forbidden to make the crook which they place on the crossroads and
wherever you find one you should burn it with fire. For you must believe
that you can be saved by no other art than the invocation and cross of
Christ. For how will it be if groves where these miserable men make their
devotions, are felled and the wood from them given to the furnace? See how
foolish man is, to offer honor to insensible, dead trees and despise the
precepts of God almighty. Do not believe that the sky or the stars or the
earth or any creature should be adored beyond God for he created and
disposes of them all."
---------------------------------------

Well, or St. Ouen and St Eligius had between their miracles the time
traveling, or there were druids in the end of roman empire. Two both lived
on Flanders and Low Countries in 7th century, and two both fight againts
druidism.


Sorry, but in 6th and 7th century it _were_ druids in Britain,
Flanders and Low Countries inside the empire; and it was the principal
religion on some places near the empire -like Ireland-. The action of
Christian bishops on some land was against them. No King
Arthur _ANY_ book of history would clear the hard time for christian
bishops in former celtic areas agains druidism. Yes, the druids of 6th
century was not the same than those who fight against Julius Caesar. The
second were warlords, the first were priests of a religion that had known
better times.

And the BBC site talks about one age were druids were the rulers, but I
can not find exactly in what part of the article you can find that druids
dissapeared in 61AD.



Yours:

Lucius Cornelius Malacitanus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39251 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: post. Id. Nov.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est postridie Idus Novembris; haec dies fastus aterque est.

"This year [326 B.C.] was marked by the dawn, as it were, of a new era
of liberty for the plebs; creditors were no longer allowed to attach
the persons of their debtors. This change in the law was brought about
by a signal instance of lust and cruelty upon the part of a
moneylender. L. Papirius was the man in question. C. Publilius had
pledged his person to him for a debt which his father had contracted.
The youth and beauty of the debtor which ought to have called forth
feelings of compassion only acted as incentives to lust and insult.
Finding that his infamous proposals only filled the youth with horror
and loathing, the man reminded him that he was absolutely in his power
and sought to terrify him by threats. As these failed to crush the
boy's noble instincts, he ordered him to be stripped and beaten.
Mangled and bleeding the boy rushed into the street and loudly
complained of the usurer's lust and brutality. A vast crowd gathered,
and on learning what had happened became furious at the outrage
offered to one of such tender years, reminding them as it did of the
conditions under which they and their children were living. They ran
into the Forum and from there in a compact body to the Senate-house.
In face of this sudden outbreak the consuls felt it necessary to
convene a meeting of the senate at once, and as the members entered
the House the crowd exhibited the lacerated back of the youth and
flung themselves at the feet of the senators as they passed in one by
one. The strongest bond and support of credit was there and then
overthrown through the mad excesses of one individual. The consuls
were instructed by the senate to lay before the people a proposal
"that no man be kept in irons or in the stocks, except such as have
been guilty of some crime, and then only till they have worked out
their sentence; and, further, that the goods and not the person of the
debtor shall be the security for the debt." So the nexi were released,
and it was forbidden for any to become nexi in the future." - Livy,
History of Rome 8.28


Today is the last day of the three day festival in honor of Iuppiter
Optimus Maximus around which the Ludi Plebii were celebrated.

Iuppiter overthew his father, Saturn (in Greek, Cronus). He then drew
lots with his brothers Poseidon and Hades to determine who would be
the supreme ruler of the gods. Iuppiter won the draw and became the
ruler of Olympus and the patron of the ancient Roman state. Iuppiter
was the rain god and lord of the sky, making his name an appropriate
one for the king of the planets. His weapon is a thunderbolt which he
hurls at those who displease him. He is married to Iuno but is famous
for his many affairs, among which are:

IO

Io was a river nymph whose beauty attracted Iuppiter, and he seduced
her. Hoping to hide his affair from the eyes of his wife Iuno,
Iuppiter covered the world with a thick blanket of clouds. Iuno wasn't
that stupid. The cloudbank aroused her suspicions so she came down to
Earth from Mount Olympus and started dispersing the clouds.

When Iuppiter realized that Iuno was about to find him and Io, he
quickly changed Io into a cow. All that Iuno found was Iuppiter
innocently standing next to a white cow, swearing that he had never
seen the cow before, that it had suddenly appeared out of the Earth.
Iuno admired the cow, and asked Iuppiter if she could have it as a
present. Iuppiter had little choice but to agree. Iuppiter and Iuno
then began a little game of "play with the cow". First, Iuno sent Io
the cow away under a guard. Iuppiter arranged for Io to be rescued and
set free. Next, Iuno set a gadfly to torment and sting Io, a terrible
torture for a cow. Io tried desperately to escape the gadfly, and
ended up wandering around the world. Her wanderings are commemorated
in several familiar place-names: the sea that Io swam across is named
after her (the Ionian Sea), as is the Bosporus strait (which
translates to "fording of the ox." ). Io eventually found her way to
Egypt, where, after Iuppiter promised to no longer pursue her, Iuno
returned her to human form.


EUROPA

"Majesty and love go ill together, nor can they long share one abode.
Abandoning the dignity of his sceptre, the father and ruler of the
gods, whose hand wields the flaming three-forked bolt, whose nod
shakes the universe, adopted the guise of a bull; and mingling with
the other bullocks, joined in their lowing and ambled in the tender
grass, a fair sight to see. His hide was white as untrodden snow, snow
not yet melted by the rainy South wind. The muscles stood out on his
neck, and deep folds of skin hung along his flanks. His horns were
small, it is true, but so beautifully made that you would swear they
were the work of an artist, more polished and shining than any jewel.
There was no menace in the set of his head or in his eyes; he looked
completely placid." - Ovid, Metamorphoses II.847-858

The story of Europa and Iuppiter begins with a dream. A Phoenician
princess, Europa dreamt that two continents, Asia and an Unnamed
place, were arguing over her: Asia said that Europa belonged to Asia
since she had been born there, but the Unnamed continent claimed that
one day Iuppiter would make it a present to Europa.

The next morning, Europa went with a group of young ladies down to the
sea to gather flowers and seashells, and Iuppiter happened to see hem.
Struck by Europa's beauty, yet knowing his fairly lecherous
reputation *and* afraid of Iuno's wrath, he disguised himself as a
pure white bull with a sweet fragrance and a lovely "moo". Naturally,
all the young maidens were delighted with this magically gentle creature.

Iuppiter then lay down in front of Europa, mooing sweetly and gazing
at her with his cow eyes --- how could she resist? She climbed up on
his back, expecting a short trot along the beach. Instead, the bull
charged off and plunged into the sea, swimming rapidly away from the
shore. As they went, gradually a whole line-up of lesser gods began
to follow, and Europa began to get the hint that the bull was
something more than a bull. She begged the bull to bring her home,
but Iuppiter, revealing who he was, told her that he was madly in love
with her and was taking her to Crete, to enjoy her company out of
sight of Iuno (he was apparently oblivious to the crowd of gods
trailing behind them).

Once they reached Crete, Iuppiter cast off his bull disguise, flinging
it into the heavens, where it took the form of the constellation
Taurus. They dallied on Crete, and Europa eventually gave birth to
three sons, the most famous of whom was Minos, the ancestor of the
Minoan people, the first European civilization. For reasons that are
never explained, Iuno seemed to remain in the dark about Europa, and
never punished the young girl.

GANYMEDE

"The king of the gods was once fired with love for Phrygian Ganymede,
and when that happened Jupiter found another shape preferable to his
own. Wishing to turn himself into a bird, he none the less scorned to
change into any save that which can carry his thunderbolts. Then
without delay, beating the air on borrowed pinions, he snatched away
the shepherd of Ilium, who even now mixes the winecups, and supplies
Jove with nectar, to the annoyance of Juno" - Ovid, Metamorphoses
X.154-160

Iuppiter was drifting around one day and spied Ganymede, the most
beautiful Trojan man ever born, playing on Mount Ida in Crete.
Iuppiter turned himself into an eagle, and grabbed Ganymede and
brought him to heaven, where he made him the cup-bearer of the gods
--- a post which had previously been held by Iuppiter's daughter Hebe.
Iuno, furious at both Iuppiter for dumping Hebe in favor of this
beautiful man *and* at Ganymede for...well, being so beautiful, began
to make very ugly noises. Iuppiter, to preserve Ganymede intact,
tossed him into the heavens where he became the constellation
Aquarius, the Water-Bearer.

Another version of the story is that Iuppiter saw Ganymede with Eos,
the goddess of the dawn, and demanded that she give Ganymede to him;
in return, Iuppiter granted Eos' wish that her current lover,
Tithonius, be made immortal. Unfortunately, Eos and Tithonius forgot
to ask hat he remain *youthful* as well, and after watching Tithonius
gradually get older and older, shriveling up in extreme old age, Eos
got bored and locked him in a room by himself, where he eventually
became just a disembodied voice.

When Ganymede's father Tros (king of either Troy or Laedemon,
depending on the version) found out that Ganymede had disappeared, he
was so upset that Iuppiter sent him two horses that could ride over
water, creating storms in their wake. These are the same two horses
that Hercules later demanded as payment for killing the sea-monster
that Neptune had sent to plague the city of Troy.

CALLISTO

"Jupiter caught sight of her and immediately desired her. He took on
the shape of the goddess Diana and spoke to Callisto, who was
delighted to see the form of her mistress. She began to tell him of
her hunting exploits, and he responded by raping her. She resisted him
as far as a woman could --- had Juno seen her she would have been less
cruel --- but how could a girl overcome a man, and who could defeat
Jupiter? He had his way, and returned to the upper air" - Ovid,
Metamorphoses II.434-437

The nymph Callisto was a favorite companion of the virgin goddess
Diana. Callisto had vowed to remain chaste, and to follow in the ways
of Diana. She accompanied Diana while hunting and was her constant
companion. Iuppiter caught a glimpse of the beautiful Callisto and, of
course, fell in love with her. Knowing that Diana had warned Callisto
of the deceitful ways of men and gods, Iuppiter cleverly disguised
himself as --- Diana. He then seduced Callisto, and Callisto
conceived a child (I'm not exactly sure when Callisto realized that
the person she was messing around with wasn't Diana, but it didn't
stop her in the end, apparently).

When Callisto's condition was revealed to Diana by jealous competitors
for Diana's attentions, Callisto was forced out of her company. She
bore a boy child named Arcas. When Iuppiter's wife Juno saw this
evidence of Iuppiter's infidelity she became enraged, and changed
Callisto into a bear. Callisto was ashamed and afraid, and fled into
the woods, not to see her son for many years.

One day, when Callisto's son Arcas was a young man, he decided to go
hunting, and went into the woods where his mother Callisto lived.
Callisto saw her son, whom she had not seen for many years. She forgot
she was a bear, and rushed forward to embrace her son. Arcas only saw
a bear rushing down on him. He lifted his bow and shot an arrow at the
beast. At the last moment Iuppiter intervened and placed Callisto and
her son in the heavens as the constellations Ursa Major and Ursa
Minor, the big and little bears.


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy, Iuppiter's escapades (http://www.pantheon.org) and
(http://www.bulfinch.org) and
(http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/folktexts.html) and
(http://www.comfychair.org/~cmbell/myth/myth.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39252 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve Marinus,

Tell that to the Japanese (even et the present time), Saudi, and Chinese (and Germans of the 1930's). They will vehemently disagree. But not to your face! They are superior and it's because of who and what they are they are as a society, race and culture or at least that is how THEY see it!

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome


Salve Annia Minucia, et salvete quirites,

annia@... wrote:

> I'm curious. Do you deny that before we had such "melting pot" societies
> that race was usually a characteristic of difference cultures?

I think it's reasonable to say that many different cultures were
composed predominantly of people who shared a common ethnicity.
However, I think it's a mistake to conflate the characteristics of a
particular culture with the genetic heritage of the people in that
culture. A given cultural group perpetuates itself via genes which
carry the genetic coding, and memes which carry the ideas down through
the generations.

> And wouldn't
> these different culture also have different values?

Possibly, but not necessarily. But we can postulate this sort of
variation for the sake of discussion.

> Ina sense, referring to
> race as the cause could be correct if we assume race=culture in this
> context.

But that's just it. Race is NOT culture. Not at all. To mistake the
one for the other is to fall into one of the most egregious errors of
the past. Strictly speaking, we are all of the human race. It is a
flawed interpretation of biology that produced the notion of different
skin colors representing different races, and unfortunately that flawed
idea has permeated the collective consciousness to the point where it
has become generally accepted.

Even by assuming that ethnicity is equal to culture we stray into
dangerous territory. Genetic heritage is not the same as memetic
heritage.

Vale, et valete quirites,

-- Marinus


SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
Roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.0/167 - Release Date: 11/11/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39253 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Druids (was "Salve Omnes")
C. Equitius Cato L. Cornelio Malacitano omnibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Cornelius Malacitanus, I think that the essence of the argument
supported by Fidelius Graecus is that the *Druids* --- a specific
political, religious and cultural entity --- were wiped out by the
Romans, not that practices similiar to those of pretty much every
culture in Europe were. Naturally, practices like celebrating the
solstices were common over vast periods of time and place, and it was
simply that this particular group of practitioners were eradicated ---
not as a religious action, but to increase Roman political control
over the tribes of Britain.

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39254 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: LUDI CIRCENSIS Subscribe to Chariot Races
G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Omnes SPD.

Well, there goes that. I posted my entry to Saturninus under
"send e-mail" and instead it warped through cyperspace to
turn up on the main board.

Now that every charioteer in Rome knows exactly what we're
gonna do, all is lost. See y'all at the tavern later.

Valete bene in pace Deorum.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana"
<silvanatextrix@g...> wrote:
>
> G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana C. Curio Saturnino SPD.
>
> SPANDEX IS BACK!
>
> My imported Auriga, Spandex the Vandal, performed well
> in his first entry into the Roman Circus. Although he
> did not win, he learned a great deal. After his promotion
> to Master of Horse, he began to develop ways to protect
> his horses from dirty tactics, such as the vicious slashing
> one of his horses received in the last race.
>
> I hope I have given you the information you need, and
> that you can use my entry.


And no, I am NOT going to repeat everything in this message just
in case you missed it in the one that was *supposed* to go to
Saturninus.

Valete anyway.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39255 From: David Santo Orcero Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Druids (was "Salve Omnes")
Salve!

> Cornelius Malacitanus, I think that the essence of the argument
> supported by Fidelius Graecus is that the *Druids* --- a specific
> political, religious and cultural entity --- were wiped out by the
> Romans, not that practices similiar to those of pretty much every
> culture in Europe were.

I understood it (alusion to King Arthur were unnecesary); but I can not
agree. There is strong historical fact by early christian bishops about
druids and druidical tradition in 6th and 7th century in some places of
the empire.

OK, Sure it is not the same than the prerroman druids. The prerroman
druids were mainly warlords and trainers (there is also historical facts
about it: all the names of druids of that time that have reach to us are
warlords, or military advisor of warlords). The 7th century druids were
some kind of pacific animist priest. But in both cases it was the same
religion and the same type of priest, on an evolved society.

Other religions also have evolution on its priesthood. It is not the same
kind of monk a crusade monk than a modern monk. And only have pased 500
years.

> simply that this particular group of practitioners were eradicated ---
> not as a religious action, but to increase Roman political control
> over the tribes of Britain.


What christian historical sources talk about is not the change of
solstice cults. All that cults were assimilated by christianity, and now
they are played with the name of one or another saint. What the sources
says is that there were priest called the druids that practiced an animist
religion. That religion survived the Roman empire; ok, druids were not as
mighty as in celtic society. They lost the military power. But in some
part of the empire druids were allowed to act as judges on all the cases
that did not carry penalty of death, and only over non-roman citicens.
This particular power dissapeared when citicenship got abroad the whole
empire and left druids with other one atribution that the priesthood; but
this was not also related to religious prosecution.


In war, (and this is the main point of my comentary), druids were not
respected. But it was not by their religion, but for their direct support
for military walfare.

Yours:


Lucius Cornelius Malacitanus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39256 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Diana enters Latina Harmonia in the Chariot races
Salve Sempronia,

> HAHA! That's great!

Cool! Usually I'm the only one that is amused by my
silly sense of humour :-))
Vale,
Diana




__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39257 From: Caius Curius Saturninus Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2181
Salve,

Well I could at most make very modest monetary contribution for the
project, maybe 15-30 Euro which wouldn't make any difference at all
when talking about +3000 Euro budget. Instead I could very well do
the calendar and handle its production with the equipment I have here
without need for external sponsors, so for me it makes a lot sense
and I suspect that overall it would save amount of working hours
needed to get a calendar for novaromani, compared efforts of the
money raising of a sum like that.

Vale,



> Message: 21
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 08:27:04 -0000
> From: "M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@...>
> Subject: Re: about calendars, I could do them if there is interest
>
> M. Lucretius Agricola C Curio Saturnino S.P.D.
>
> Why would you want to go to all that work? It sounds to me like
> citizens in Hispania have everything but the backing. Why not bring
> some funds to the table and ask to join them? I would wager it would
> save lots of time and work.
>
> It sounds to me like the calendar enjoyed a good bit of popularity. I
> see that it takes some money to get the work done, so why don't we see
> a group getting together to fund the venture and keep it going? It
> seems that it may work for other things. It is getting late but it is
> not yet too late.


Caius Curius Saturninus

Tribunus Plebis
Propraetor Provinciae Thules
Procurator Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org
gsm: +358-50-3315279
fax: +358-9-8754751
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39258 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: ITS ENOUGH!
Why all the fuss over a shovel?
:-)
> A **Spade** .
<<If I say call a spade,a spade.




__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39259 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus; salvete, omnes.

On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 06:44:36AM -0500, Timothy P. Gallagher wrote:
> Salve Romans
>
> Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote in part
>
> "It adds nothing to the value of the discussion of either Roma Antiqua
> or modern day France to suggest that the problems are based in the
> racial differences between one group and another. Social differences
> have to do with societal attitudes, values, and beliefs. They don't
> come encoded in DNA along with skin color, eye color, nose size, and
> other physical characteristics."
>
> It was not my intent to "repeat... a racist agenda" if that is what T.
> Frank views are.

I think that his views have come to be strongly associated with a racist
agenda because they are often used to bolster that type of argument. The
writing you cited is, in itself, not racist in my opinion - it is simply
badly misguided. Not surprising, for his time.

> I was interested in what he had to say in that if you
> physically replace one group of people with an other, over time, you
> will get different ways of doing and thinking about how the world
> should work. It was not my intent to label one as better or worse but
> just different.

Well, it certainly seems to have stimulated a lot of discussion on the
topic - with some excellent reference material provided by Quintus
Suetonius Paulinus and others. If nothing else, there's plenty of "meat"
there, and much historical perspective on race - as well as an
opportunity to compare it to the modern perspective and to draw some
conclusions based on that comparison.

For me, this is one of the chief attractions of Nova Roma: discussion of
the thoughts, the philosophies - the Mos Maiorum - that went into making
a Roman citizen what they were, and Rome into what it was. There's
always the opportunity to compare, to contrast, and perhaps to modify
one's own actions to align more closely with those one finds laudable.
This, to me, is how we *become* more Roman, and how we re-affirm our
values.

> I apologize if this discussion in anyway insulted anybody. It was not
> my intent and I will now drop it.

A handsome apology, Pauline. I was not myself offended by the initial
post, but your consideration for those who may have been is a fine
example of Roman virtue.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Homo homini lupus.
Man is man's wolf.
-- Plautus, "Asinaria"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39260 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: The Tenney Frank Question
Salve omnes,

If I understand the discussion, the big argument is whether or not race
determines culture and/or values, etc.

Race in and of itself does not determine the cultural or moral makeup of
an individual or people. However, having a homogenous race does make the
maintenance of that culture easier. To illustrate the first sentence
(and please correct me if I am wrong- these are the observations of an
American who is subject to mispercation), consider the Black communty
in, say, England. I would be willing to bet that you could take many of
those Blacks out of their communities and transplant them to L.A. or New
York, or Detroit and they would be completely out of their element. From
the perception I have, the Black culture of England is quite distinct
from that of the US. This is only an example, but the modeel serves the
point- it doesn't matter WHAT race you may be born into- your values and
cultural makeup are determined through education and your surroundings.

Now, as far as the second point- that of the advantage of maintaining a
homogenous race- I will not go into the various theories forwarded by
the run-of-the-mill White Power groups or those of what became the
'Nazi' party of Germany in the 30's. I would, however, propose the
single idea that by limiting your breeding to a single racial group, be
that Black, Asian, White, or Indian, or what have you, your chances of
maintaining a sustainable culture are much greater. One cannot propose
to teach solid Northern European values, for example, while living the
life of an East Coast drug gang member- it just doesn't work, and it
serves only to confuse the young who will then invariable proceed to
make bad- sometimes fatal- choices along the way. By the same token, it
would not do for an Orthodox Jewish household to celebrate, say,
Christmas- or Kwanzaa, or Ramadan; this is not only from a religious
perspective, but a cultural one as well. One teaches the values you
expect your children to carry on- it's cultural suicide to do anything
less, regardless of your race. Hence the advantage to maintaining a
single racial grouping with respect to culture; it just makes sense to
not 'water down' your bloodline and, as a result of that, your heritage.

With respect to the fall of ancient Rome, perhaps there is some merit to
the argument that the influx of 'outsiders' led to the watering down of
classical Roman culture and led to the breakdown of society. I am no
scholar on this, of course, but it does make sense to think that once
your cultural 'base' erodes, so goes the society- and it doesn't stop
until the nation itself is divided and broken. Would Rome have lasted to
the present day by tightening up on its citizenry and/or limiting who
could and could not be a Roman- and what practices were allowed within
its borders? Perhaps, but we shall never know, obviously. I suspect,
however, that had Rome limited its conquests its society would not have
reached critical mass with respect to assimilating other cultures- just
by giving someone the title of Citizen does not automatically confer
cultural solidarity.

My ramblings are worse than usual this morning- too much on my mind!
However, as always, I welcome and await your comments and/or corrections.

Valete,

G Licinius Crassus



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39261 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: The Tenney Frank Question
Salve Crassus,

There are indeed populations/culture that have lasted into the twentieth century from antiquity "intact". China is a prime example. Its homogenous nature may be the reason. It is also a "racist" society in many ways. Its name Chung Kuo "Middle Kingdom" reveals much: it is the center of all things. With very few exceptions, China never bothered to conquer too far a field from its base since it considered the cultures outside of it inferior and not worth the trouble.

Mark Salzman's book "Iron & Silk" chronicles his stay in China shortly after the Bamboo Curtain was lifted in the 1970's. He was treated well enough (albeit as a sort of foreign pet) because of his blue eyes, fair skin and blonde hair. He however, met a black man in his travels there who had never shared a meal or even a solitary conversation with any Chinese while there because the Chinese considered him to be a "black demon". Although things may have changed somewhat there since then, I doubt very much that they have changed very much.

I won't even speak much of the Japanese, another ancient society that has entered modern times intact. I have had dealings with them for 40 years and I know they are extremely racist! For example, no one can "become" Japanese no matter how long they may reside there and contribute to their nation. They even despise the Okinawans!!!

Another society that has remained homogenous since antiquity and in my opinion is still very racist is the Saudi Arabian culture/society/race. I have met many a Saudi Arab that has married a western woman, but I have never met a western man who has even been allowed even to date an Saudi Arabian woman. I have had many a conversation with a friend of mine who is a Saudi Prince (also a martial arts teacher in Saudi Arabia) who is a very fine man and martial artist. He insists that Saudi Arabian women are never to be allowed to marry outside of the "race" or the "faith". He is not alone in this racist opinion.

The Romans in my opinion (at least in the Republic) also considered themselves superior to the peoples they conquered and also looked down their "Roman ;-)" noses at people of those "races" or those Romans who married into them - especially women who married foreigners. Even Cleopatra, a Hellenic Queen of Egypt with a rather long pedigree was looked upon as little more than an exotic whore in Rome by the fair ladies of that city, and not just because of her relationship with Caesar. Who by the way showed a lot of contempt for that civilization displayed in no small way by allowing the Library at Alexandria to burn. Marc Antony was no exception either. He would fornicate with her but not marry her.

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus



----- Original Message -----
From: Gaius Licinius Crassus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 11:24 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] The Tenney Frank Question


Salve omnes,

If I understand the discussion, the big argument is whether or not race
determines culture and/or values, etc.

Race in and of itself does not determine the cultural or moral makeup of
an individual or people. However, having a homogenous race does make the
maintenance of that culture easier. To illustrate the first sentence
(and please correct me if I am wrong- these are the observations of an
American who is subject to mispercation), consider the Black communty
in, say, England. I would be willing to bet that you could take many of
those Blacks out of their communities and transplant them to L.A. or New
York, or Detroit and they would be completely out of their element. From
the perception I have, the Black culture of England is quite distinct
from that of the US. This is only an example, but the modeel serves the
point- it doesn't matter WHAT race you may be born into- your values and
cultural makeup are determined through education and your surroundings.

Now, as far as the second point- that of the advantage of maintaining a
homogenous race- I will not go into the various theories forwarded by
the run-of-the-mill White Power groups or those of what became the
'Nazi' party of Germany in the 30's. I would, however, propose the
single idea that by limiting your breeding to a single racial group, be
that Black, Asian, White, or Indian, or what have you, your chances of
maintaining a sustainable culture are much greater. One cannot propose
to teach solid Northern European values, for example, while living the
life of an East Coast drug gang member- it just doesn't work, and it
serves only to confuse the young who will then invariable proceed to
make bad- sometimes fatal- choices along the way. By the same token, it
would not do for an Orthodox Jewish household to celebrate, say,
Christmas- or Kwanzaa, or Ramadan; this is not only from a religious
perspective, but a cultural one as well. One teaches the values you
expect your children to carry on- it's cultural suicide to do anything
less, regardless of your race. Hence the advantage to maintaining a
single racial grouping with respect to culture; it just makes sense to
not 'water down' your bloodline and, as a result of that, your heritage.

With respect to the fall of ancient Rome, perhaps there is some merit to
the argument that the influx of 'outsiders' led to the watering down of
classical Roman culture and led to the breakdown of society. I am no
scholar on this, of course, but it does make sense to think that once
your cultural 'base' erodes, so goes the society- and it doesn't stop
until the nation itself is divided and broken. Would Rome have lasted to
the present day by tightening up on its citizenry and/or limiting who
could and could not be a Roman- and what practices were allowed within
its borders? Perhaps, but we shall never know, obviously. I suspect,
however, that had Rome limited its conquests its society would not have
reached critical mass with respect to assimilating other cultures- just
by giving someone the title of Citizen does not automatically confer
cultural solidarity.

My ramblings are worse than usual this morning- too much on my mind!
However, as always, I welcome and await your comments and/or corrections.

Valete,

G Licinius Crassus



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.0/167 - Release Date: 11/11/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39262 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Druids (was "Salve Omnes")
They could not be wiped out entirely because they had Ireland and Caledonia
outside the Empire to go to and in reality, probably many of the less accessible
parts of the Pyrenees and Wales. On the other hand, religions develop,
especially underground. There's every chance too that their remit was so broad
(and individuals so diverse) that everything aout them is pretty much true.
There seems little doubt that Irish druids Christianised and carried on very
much as before as advisors, 'intelligence service', and 'supernatural warfare'
for their Lords.
The kind of riddles that make no sense in translation even symbolically seem
to have been very important, perhaps showing intelligence towork them out. They
work by reading across words, something like the children's trick of getting
someone to say "Iced ink" until it becomes "I stink". This kind of wordplay
continues long into the Christian period with no change. I would guess that they
were well-educated and merely incorporated the more Eastern Christian attitudes
into a polytheism that probably already included an idea of universal divinity.
There has to be something in the legend that St. Brigid wanted to marry Patrick
but when he explained he was celibate (very unusual for Irish priests) became
his follower. Brigid is the old national Goddesss so it looks like recognising
an 'update' to tradition rather than complete replacement. The Celtic Church
seems to have been both much more nature-aware but more given to 'yogic'
austerities than the Roman. That would fit an inheritance from some of what we
know about Druid training.





C. Equitius Cato L. Cornelio Malacitano omnibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Cornelius Malacitanus, I think that the essence of the argument
supported by Fidelius Graecus is that the *Druids* --- a specific
political, religious and cultural entity --- were wiped out by the
Romans, not that practices similiar to those of pretty much every
culture in Europe were. Naturally, practices like celebrating the
solstices were common over vast periods of time and place, and it was
simply that this particular group of practitioners were eradicated ---
not as a religious action, but to increase Roman political control
over the tribes of Britain.

Vale et valete,

Cato









YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on theweb.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an emailto:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










"God created man and man created God. So is it in the world. Men make
gods and they worship their creations. If would be fitting for the gods to
worship men" - Gospel of Thomas, Logion 85:1-4



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39263 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: ITS ENOUGH!
Don't tell me you don't know /exactly/ what you are talking about, you Wicked
Woman! How dare you pretend this air of innocence when you are spreading these
evil racist epithets about. Tut Tut! To the NAACP and 'aroint thee, witch,
aroint thee'.
:p

PS Anybody know what 'aroint' means?




Why all the fuss over a shovel?
:-)
> A **Spade** .
<





"An outrage a day keeps complaisance at bay." - Viv Stanshall


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39264 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: The Tenney Frank Question
I think you have a lot of good arguments here but I find Tenney wrong in the
first place. It is Orientalism that kept the Empire going in the Orient and
transferred eventually to Muscovy (with Mongol additions). It looks more to be
failure on both sides to accept or to integrate, as well as religious difference
between Athanasian and Arian Christianity that alienated the Teutons where
earlier groups had Romanised.
I suspect there is a real difference that Romans were in most cases the
barbarians from the West and North. However they looked down on others there was
also an element that 'accepting' them to some extent meant being accepted by
them. One might compare early Europeans in India. Germans really were barbarous,
not city folk, something that hadn't really been seen since Homer's day, at
first seemingly interested in Romanising, but as they were excluded, stopped
wasting their time. After all, individual Teutons did rise in the Army and
controlled the last Western Emperors. If there's anything to learn in modern
times, it is the danger of practical exclusion leading to turning away from
wanting to be included.
And as somebody remarked of British Blacks, the young do aspire to an American
ghetto image I suspect they would be as lost in as an earlier generation of
crooks actually confronted with Al Capone's Chicago. That is, when the West
Indians aren't fighting the Africans!
Caesariensis



Salve Crassus,

There are indeed populations/culture that have lasted into the twentiethcentury
from antiquity "intact". China is a prime example. Itshomogenous nature may be
the reason. It is also a "racist" societyin many ways. Its name Chung Kuo
"Middle Kingdom" reveals much: itis the center of all things. With very few
exceptions, China never bothered toconquer too far a field from its base since
it considered the cultures outsideof it inferior and not worth the trouble.



"An outrage a day keeps complaisance at bay." - Viv Stanshall


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39265 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: The Tenney Frank Question
A. Apollonius M. Cassio omnibusque sal.

> The Romans in my opinion (at least in the Republic)
> also considered themselves superior to the peoples
> they conquered and also looked down their "Roman
> ;-)" noses at people of those "races" or those
> Romans who married into them - especially women who
> married foreigners. Even Cleopatra, a Hellenic Queen
> of Egypt with a rather long pedigree was looked upon
> as little more than an exotic whore in Rome by the
> fair ladies of that city, and not just because of
> her relationship with Caesar. Who by the way showed
> a lot of contempt for that civilization displayed in
> no small way by allowing the Library at Alexandria
> to burn. Marc Antony was no exception either. He
> would fornicate with her but not marry her.

The Romans did look down their noses at other peoples,
but not because the other peoples were of different
races. They also looked down their noses at other
Latin cities, and Romans were ethnically Latins
themselves. Their bias was cultural: they disdained
those who did not behave in a Roman way, but anyone
who behaved like a Roman was okay, just as the ancient
Chinese were prepared to regard anyone as Chinese who
spoke the language and shared the culture. You will
find very little disparaging reference in Roman
sources to the physical appearance of foreigners. The
closest you get is when they first encounter the Huns,
but they can be excused for being somewhat shocked by
the Huns since the latter were not only the first
Mongoloid people the Mediterranean world had ever seen
but also probably practiced decorative facial scarring
and perhaps skull-deformation.

Romans basically thought they were culturally superior
to other people, and frankly in many ways they had
good reason to think so. But they didn't regard Gauls
or Africans as inherently, biologically inferior. They
just saw that they came from different and, to their
eyes, less advanced cultures. When they complained
about Gauls coming into the senate, they were worried
that these people had not yet been fully Romanized,
but they never believed, like some eighteenth,
nineteenth, and twentieth century people did, that
some races were biologically incapable of ever
becoming civilized. They fully expected that the Gauls
would become civilized in due course, but some felt
that the process had not yet advanced far enough for
them to take part in Roman public life.

The Roman attitude toward the Greeks (in a broad
sense, including the Hellenistic dynasties of
Macedonia, Syria, Egypt, &c.) was a bit more complex,
because the Romans had great respect for the colossal
achievements of Greek culture in the fields of art,
philosophy, and so on. In these areas there's no doubt
that most Romans felt distinctly inferior (and that in
itself partly explains their occasional hostility to
Greeks). But they also considered, and with some
justification, that the Greeks of their own time were
pale shadows of the great Greeks of the past, and
respect for Socrates and Aeschylus didn't, in their
eyes, necessarily entail respect for contemporary
Greeks. Moreover, many Romans considered that the
things the Greeks were better than Romans at were not
very important things. This is very much the Catonian
line of thought. The Greeks were good at many things,
but the Romans were superior at two things: law and
war. And these two things, many Romans believed, were
of far more fundamental importance than philosophy and
art. Thus they had a sense of superiority not because
they were better than the Greeks but because the
things they were good at were better than the things
the Greeks were good at.

As for marrying foreigners, the evidence seems to
suggest that marriage between Romans and foreigners
was pretty common and not regarded with disdain. Of
course the Roman aristocracy married within its own
ranks for political and social reasons: one could not
gain any advantage in Roman politics by marrying a
Greek. We must be careful not to import medieval or
Hellenistic ideas of international, interdynastic
marriage-alliance into the Roman period, to which they
are quite inappropriate. The aim of a Roman politician
was to win support and votes in Rome. Marrying the
queen of Egypt was absolutely useless to him because
the Egyptian queen didn't vote in Roman elections or
have any clients who voted in Roman elections. Sure,
she had armies of Egyptians, but armies of Egyptians
are no use in Roman elections. M. Antonius would have
gained no more political advantage from marrying
Cleopatra than Hillary Clinton would gain from
marrying Prince Charles. Sure, she'd become Queen of
England one day, but would that help her become
President of the United States?



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39266 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: about calendars, I could do them if there is interest
Salve C Curi Saturnine

As I have found this year's calendar invaluable, please put me down for next
year's! I like the sound of what you are proposing.

S Pontius Pilatus Barbatus



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Caius Curius Saturninus
Sent: 14 November 2005 07:21
To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] about calendars, I could do them if there is interest



Salvete omnes,

I have seen some mails about that there will not be calendars for
next year produced by Provincia Hispania. I have not read all of the
mails in this discussion and latest digest has not yet arrived to me
so my apologies if this item has already found its solution.

However I and my wife Emilia could do calendars for next year, and if
I get enough positive responsies we will do it. I have been thinking
about A4 or A5 sized calendar with colour photos or drawings of Rome
and Roman themes with Roman and modern dates. I would love to include
information about festivals and such if I can find reliable source
for information on that. The price would be 15 to 30 Euros per
calendar (depending on numerous factors). If the decision is made
quickly then I can promise to be able to send first calendars to
those who pre-order it before January, otherwise during the first
week or two of January. And naturally I would apply position in
equesterian order and even if not getting it still donate appropriate
part of profit to NR.

The most urgent thing is that I need feedback about this. If you
would be willing to buy one or could help with e.g. research about
the festivals and such additional information or have anything to say
about the idea, please send me private email or continue discussion
at this list if you like.

Valete,

Caius Curius Saturninus

Tribunus Plebis
Propraetor Provinciae Thules
Procurator Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org
gsm: +358-50-3315279
fax: +358-9-8754751





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




SPONSORED LINKS


Ancient
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=F
all+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&
s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ> history

Fall
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+his
tory&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+em
pire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA> of the roman empire

The
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient
+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roma
n+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ> fall of the roman empire


Roman
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall
+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=1
03&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw> empire







_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39267 From: Richard Sciarappa Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: about calendars, I could do them if there is interest
Salve,

I am very interested in having a calendar.
Right now, I am using print-outs, many...many
printouts and the whole thing is very messy.
I would love a calender like the one you
are proposing.

PAX DEORUM

Lucius Cassius Cornutus



-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Bird <p.bird@...>
Sent: Nov 14, 2005 2:43 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] about calendars, I could do them if there is interest

Salve C Curi Saturnine

As I have found this year's calendar invaluable, please put me down for next
year's! I like the sound of what you are proposing.

S Pontius Pilatus Barbatus



  _____ 

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Caius Curius Saturninus
Sent: 14 November 2005 07:21
To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] about calendars, I could do them if there is interest



Salvete omnes,

I have seen some mails about that there will not be calendars for 
next year produced by Provincia Hispania. I have not read all of the 
mails in this discussion and latest digest has not yet arrived to me 
so my apologies if this item has already found its solution.

However I and my wife Emilia could do calendars for next year, and if 
I get enough positive responsies we will do it. I have been thinking 
about A4 or A5 sized calendar with colour photos or drawings of Rome 
and Roman themes with Roman and modern dates. I would love to include 
information about festivals and such if I can find reliable source 
for information on that. The price would be 15 to 30 Euros per 
calendar (depending on numerous factors). If the decision is made 
quickly then I can promise to be able to send first calendars to 
those who pre-order it before January, otherwise during the first 
week or two of January. And naturally I would apply position in 
equesterian order and even if not getting it still donate appropriate 
part of profit to NR.

The most urgent thing is that I need feedback about this. If you 
would be willing to buy one or could help with e.g. research about 
the festivals and such additional information or have anything to say 
about the idea, please send me private email or continue discussion 
at this list if you like.

Valete,

Caius Curius Saturninus

Tribunus Plebis
Propraetor Provinciae Thules
Procurator Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org
gsm: +358-50-3315279
fax: +358-9-8754751





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




SPONSORED LINKS


Ancient
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=F
all+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&
s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ>  history

Fall
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+his
tory&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+em
pire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA>  of the roman empire

The
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient
+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roma
n+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ>  fall of the roman empire


Roman
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall
+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=1
03&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw>  empire







  _____ 

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



*      Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.
 
*      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
 
*      Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service.



  _____ 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


*  Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
 
*  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
 
*  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39268 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: about calendars, I could do them if there is interest
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes.

"I would love to include information about festivals and such if I can
find reliable source for information on that."

ummmmmmm...Curius Saturninus, I'm not sure if you've noticed, but I've
been doing the calendar for almost a year now. If you need a source
for information regarding the Roman year I think I can certainly help
in that respect.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39269 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: E. Pluribus Unum no longer- in Queens at least.
The problem as far as NYC is concerned is that are TOO
many races,cultures,lifestyles & its bad to be
American.When I was a kid it mattered to be
American...
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<glcrassus@...> wrote:
> Salve omnes,
>
> If I understand the discussion, the big argument is
whether or not race
> determines culture and/or values, etc.
>
> Race in and of itself does not determine the
cultural or moral makeup of
> an individual or people. However, having a
homogenous race does make the
> maintenance of that culture easier. To illustrate
the first sentence
> (and please correct me if I am wrong- these are the
observations of an
> American who is subject to mispercation), consider
the Black communty
> in, say, England. I would be willing to bet that you
could take many of
> those Blacks out of their communities and transplant
them to L.A. or New
> York, or Detroit and they would be completely out of
their element. From
> the perception I have, the Black culture of England
is quite distinct
> from that of the US. This is only an example, but
the modeel serves the
> point- it doesn't matter WHAT race you may be born
into- your values and
> cultural makeup are determined through education and
your surroundings.
>
> Now, as far as the second point- that of the
advantage of maintaining a
> homogenous race- I will not go into the various
theories forwarded by
> the run-of-the-mill White Power groups or those of
what became the
> 'Nazi' party of Germany in the 30's. I would,
however, propose the
> single idea that by limiting your breeding to a
single racial group, be
> that Black, Asian, White, or Indian, or what have
you, your chances of
> maintaining a sustainable culture are much greater.
One cannot propose
> to teach solid Northern European values, for
example, while living the
> life of an East Coast drug gang member- it just
doesn't work, and it
> serves only to confuse the young who will then
invariable proceed to
> make bad- sometimes fatal- choices along the way. By
the same token, it
> would not do for an Orthodox Jewish household to
celebrate, say,
> Christmas- or Kwanzaa, or Ramadan; this is not only
from a religious
> perspective, but a cultural one as well. One teaches
the values you
> expect your children to carry on- it's cultural
suicide to do anything
> less, regardless of your race. Hence the advantage
to maintaining a
> single racial grouping with respect to culture; it
just makes sense to
> not 'water down' your bloodline and, as a result of
that, your heritage.
>
> With respect to the fall of ancient Rome, perhaps
there is some merit to
> the argument that the influx of 'outsiders' led to
the watering down of
> classical Roman culture and led to the breakdown of
society. I am no
> scholar on this, of course, but it does make sense
to think that once
> your cultural 'base' erodes, so goes the society-
and it doesn't stop
> until the nation itself is divided and broken. Would
Rome have lasted to
> the present day by tightening up on its citizenry
and/or limiting who
> could and could not be a Roman- and what practices
were allowed within
> its borders? Perhaps, but we shall never know,
obviously. I suspect,
> however, that had Rome limited its conquests its
society would not have
> reached critical mass with respect to assimilating
other cultures- just
> by giving someone the title of Citizen does not
automatically confer
> cultural solidarity.
>
> My ramblings are worse than usual this morning- too
much on my mind!
> However, as always, I welcome and await your
comments and/or corrections.
>
> Valete,
>
> G Licinius Crassus
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39270 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: The Tenney Frank Question
Dont worry about China. Since our free trade debacle
Bejing is doing fine at our expense.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<senseiphil@...> wrote:
> Salve Crassus,
>
> There are indeed populations/culture that have
lasted into the twentieth century from antiquity
"intact". China is a prime example. Its homogenous
nature may be the reason. It is also a "racist"
society in many ways. Its name Chung Kuo "Middle
Kingdom" reveals much: it is the center of all things.
With very few exceptions, China never bothered to
conquer too far a field from its base since it
considered the cultures outside of it inferior and not
worth the trouble.
>
> Mark Salzman's book "Iron & Silk" chronicles his
stay in China shortly after the Bamboo Curtain was
lifted in the 1970's. He was treated well enough
(albeit as a sort of foreign pet) because of his blue
eyes, fair skin and blonde hair. He however, met a
black man in his travels there who had never shared a
meal or even a solitary conversation with any Chinese
while there because the Chinese considered him to be a
"black demon". Although things may have changed
somewhat there since then, I doubt very much that they
have changed very much.
>
> I won't even speak much of the Japanese, another
ancient society that has entered modern times intact.
I have had dealings with them for 40 years and I know
they are extremely racist! For example, no one can
"become" Japanese no matter how long they may reside
there and contribute to their nation. They even
despise the Okinawans!!!
>
> Another society that has remained homogenous since
antiquity and in my opinion is still very racist is
the Saudi Arabian culture/society/race. I have met
many a Saudi Arab that has married a western woman,
but I have never met a western man who has even been
allowed even to date an Saudi Arabian woman. I have
had many a conversation with a friend of mine who is a
Saudi Prince (also a martial arts teacher in Saudi
Arabia) who is a very fine man and martial artist. He
insists that Saudi Arabian women are never to be
allowed to marry outside of the "race" or the "faith".
He is not alone in this racist opinion.
>
> The Romans in my opinion (at least in the Republic)
also considered themselves superior to the peoples
they conquered and also looked down their "Roman ;-)"
noses at people of those "races" or those Romans who
married into them - especially women who married
foreigners. Even Cleopatra, a Hellenic Queen of Egypt
with a rather long pedigree was looked upon as little
more than an exotic whore in Rome by the fair ladies
of that city, and not just because of her relationship
with Caesar. Who by the way showed a lot of contempt
for that civilization displayed in no small way by
allowing the Library at Alexandria to burn. Marc
Antony was no exception either. He would fornicate
with her but not marry her.
>
> Vires et honos,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gaius Licinius Crassus
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 11:24 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] The Tenney Frank Question
>
>
> Salve omnes,
>
> If I understand the discussion, the big argument
is whether or not race
> determines culture and/or values, etc.
>
> Race in and of itself does not determine the
cultural or moral makeup of
> an individual or people. However, having a
homogenous race does make the
> maintenance of that culture easier. To illustrate
the first sentence
> (and please correct me if I am wrong- these are
the observations of an
> American who is subject to mispercation), consider
the Black communty
> in, say, England. I would be willing to bet that
you could take many of
> those Blacks out of their communities and
transplant them to L.A. or New
> York, or Detroit and they would be completely out
of their element. From
> the perception I have, the Black culture of
England is quite distinct
> from that of the US. This is only an example, but
the modeel serves the
> point- it doesn't matter WHAT race you may be born
into- your values and
> cultural makeup are determined through education
and your surroundings.
>
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39271 From: Maior Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: about calendars, I could do them if there is interest
M. Hortensia G. Equitio Catoni et C. Curio spd;
I believe Caius Curius means the sources, where you find it
all from. Saturnine, I can help you Marcus Horatius has an online
calendar with the religious Fasti and Cordus and Scaevola made a
great online Republican calendar with civic fasti.
I would love a shiny Roman calendar!
bene valete
Marca Hortensia Maior




> Salvete omnes.
>
> "I would love to include information about festivals and such if I
can
> find reliable source for information on that."
>
> ummmmmmm...Curius Saturninus, I'm not sure if you've noticed, but
I've
> been doing the calendar for almost a year now. If you need a
source
> for information regarding the Roman year I think I can certainly
help
> in that respect.
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39272 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Druids, Christians, Culdees
This is something I put up offline that might explain some of what
happened to the original Druids. There's no necessity to believe people
inevitably either hostile to a new religion or ready to throw their entire
tradition away. On the other hand, we know very little about either the Cetlic
or early churches or whether Celtic tradition even came from the same line as
Roman. Probably it did not.
It's not known when Christianity reached Ireland but we know that Patrick was
on his own recognisance following visions, while the existing Bishop had been
recalled or thrown out. Traditionallly, Christ reached Britain before
Christianity trading tin with Uncle Joseph the Arimethean and Joseph himself
brought the Holy Grail to Glastonbury Tor before the Roman conquest. Peter
appointed the British aristocrat Linus as fist Roman Bishop.
How much has any factual basis is unguessable except that Irenaeus and
Eusebius among others make no mention of Peter as Roman Bishop. I guess that
Christianity did reach both Britain and Ireland by sea before it had spread far
into Europe by land in a form originating along the trade route from Alexandria.
It might also have arrived in the form of refugees and later, of Galileean
slaves shipped to the back of beyond. Then again, differences of emphasis from
Roman tradition might just be older.
Augustine 'Non angli sed angeli' sent a mission to claim the Anglo-Saxons for
Rome before Columcille's successors got them coming through Holy Island and
Lindisfarne. British Christian themselves flatly refused to go near them. It was
a badly designed mission using the Roman urban adminstrative model for rural
people. Celtic bishops appear to have been peripatetic and monastic rather than
monarchical but even by that early time, many upper church echelons were rich
and often hereditory sinecures.
Presumably, the Roman urban model that should have been there for a least a
century had vanished with the urban population. It is possible that compulsory
Christianity came so close to the garrison withdrawal after a period of
isolation that it was conveniently dropped in the Channel with far more pressing
concerns on the Litores Saxonorum et Anglorum than adding religious division to
an already unworkable defensive administration.
Christianity is a remarkable omission from both Arthur and Vortigern. I think
what was going on there was a form of civil war between Roman and unromanised
elements. Most 'historical' views of Arthur ignore that Christianity had been
legal for 150 years and compulsory for about half of that. What then is Myrddin
(presumably Murdo) who appears with both Uortigern and Arthur and why is there
no priest at Arthur's court even before Camelodunon inspires Camelot? It is
probably significant that Arthur must cover the period of deposing Romulus
Augustulus, so could be asserted Rex without challengers at the end of his
career however legally dubious its beginnings.
If Ambrosius Aurelius is 'Last of the Romans' while Uortigern (probably more
than one - The German equivalent is Thiudareiks, Hellenised to Theodorikos) is a
'Tyrant' while Arthur follows, it also follows neither of these was considered
Roman. Arthur we read carried the Virgin, or a Christian symbol, into battle at
Badon, like Constantine. That means he was not displaying it before. It may mean
he never displayed it all but the Nennius could not deny such a successful
battle implications of Christian miracle.
Gildas never mentions Arthur but does admit that for forty years, the land has
been relatively peaceful but no longer is. His very existence means that some
kind of native church was still active. Even if not a 'Roman' church, its
affiliations would surely be more to Roman civilisation than to Celtic warlords
of possible Irish extraction. Tintagel too is early and its land fortification
suggest it was expecting danger from its Celtic hinterland. How far it was mixed
monastery on the Celtic style and how far castle retreat we can't tell but to
man the walls would need substantial numbers, probably more than lived there.
When any New Testament character came to a particular location may mean when
evangelists arrived. It is interesting that Glastonbury has very early Christian
associations while Stonehenge and Avebory complex do not. Stonehenge may not
have fallen out of use in Roman times. It's unimaginable that Druids did not use
it but without Druids? Early writings tell of a 'great round Temple to the Sun'
which could have been Woodhenge, some kind of circular maze, probably covered,
of which only the post-holes and not much memory remain.
They were all out of the way places, probably trekked to for festivals.
Glastonbury was also inaccessible as tidal marsh, 'The Isle of Avalon'.
"Arthur's Voyage to the Underworld" ends each verse with reference to few
returning from mystical Castles, implicitely all the same place, two being 'Caer
Sidi' (Spirit Castle - as in Irish Ban Sidhe) and 'Caer Wydryn' (or Wydern -
one is Welsh, the other Cornish) This last means 'Glass Castle', the original
of Glastonbury.
Wydyrn, however, is not a British word: it is Latin Uitrum. In turn, Woad was
unknown to Romans but they called it Uitrum because Roman cheap glass was blue.
It comes together: Glastonbury as a traditional ritual centre involving woad
tattooing. In any case, woad still grows around there. Christianity would have
to take possession of any great pagan complex. This might not have been as
cynical as Pope Leo's hijacking to replace pagan festivals. It might have had
more in the way of Christian adoption of Jewish history and Muslim of both, as a
'new dispensation' of old knowledge.
There is a likelihood that non-Roman Christianity was far more favourable to
pagan traditions. The Naj Hammadi Coptic collection includes definite pagan
texts but so does much Moslem Egyptian tradition. They could only have got it
from an Egypt Christianised for at least three official centuries and illegally
another at least before that. Sacred wells and hills and fairy mounds bound also
in Celtic areas where neolithic structures survive. Much of Avebury double
circle is concrete markers because of centuries of English Christian vandalism.
The same has not happened in more Celtic areas, even migrant Brittany compared
to the rest of France.
I find that suggestive that the Celtic Church saw tradition more as
predecessor than enemy. Relations with Rome probably helped. They could identify
with another Roman-suppressed people. Boudicca comes retrospectively in the
same timeframe as the Jerusalem Uprising. Celtic Christianity is certainly old
enough to be independent of legal Roman organisation. It produced its own
heresy in the form of Pelagius denying Original Sin. It may not have been
heretical when he proclaimed it since it is only Augustine who made it a
serious issue and it matter less in Orthodoxy. The inherited sin early
Christians washed off would have been affiliation to another religion.
There is later circumstantial evidence for Druids becoming Christian bishops
in a genetic marker unique to Ashkenazi men surnamed Levi. This fits tradition
that on their conversion, the hereditory Khazar priesthood adopted the Levite
role while they waited for Jewish-born Kohens. (And also means that Eastern Jews
were still performing rites requiring the traditionaly priestly castes).
Priests necessarily know the Mysteries. If new Mysteries come along, they are
best equipped to understand them, at least until new priests can be trained.
Consequently, any of their existing traditions not in direct conflict are likely
to come with them.
Druids and Celtic Priests (both often called Culdees, from Chaldean, another
sign of similarity) were necessarily in tune with Nature. They were the sages of
rural people depending on Nature for everything. Distinction between
'practical' and 'magical, 'natural' and 'supernatural' is false modernity -
like somebody I knew who didn't 'believe in hypnosis': it works, therefore it
exists. Everything was practical and natural. Even urbanised Romans were only
at one remove. This kind of practical knowledge in a warlike people would come
closer to the hard-headedness mixed with superstition common among peasants
than any New Age delicacy. Besides, Christianity was the 'New Age'. There might
be parallels with Shinto in Shogunate Japan.
They could not have had a 'New Age' outlook because by definition that is an
urban romanticisation of an unfamiliar past full of distinctions between
'natural' 'unnatural' and 'supernatural'. You don't avoid ploughing up 'fairy
mounds' because you want to be nice to fairies: you avoid it because they
terrify you if you're not! (And if you trace them, you find that a lot of
Fairies are either malicious Nature Spirits or often the Dead). Even most of the
self-styled traditional Witch and Pagan groups have no time for it.
Christianity never denied their existence. If anything it promoted them from
part of the natural order with rules to handle to powerful evil spirits capable
of giving even saints a hard time.
We can assume then a lot of evidence for Druids merging into the Celtic
Church.
Caesariensis



"God created man and man created God. So is it in the world. Men make
gods and they worship their creations. If would be fitting for the gods to
worship men" - Gospel of Thomas, Logion 85:1-4



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39273 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2181
Salve,

Ah, now I understand. That is really wonderful then. Still, if you
contact the people in Hispania they may be able to help you get all
the information you need quickly.

Optime vale!


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Caius Curius Saturninus
<c.curius@a...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> Well I could at most make very modest monetary contribution for the
> project, maybe 15-30 Euro which wouldn't make any difference at all
> when talking about +3000 Euro budget. Instead I could very well do
> the calendar and handle its production with the equipment I have here
> without need for external sponsors, so for me it makes a lot sense
> and I suspect that overall it would save amount of working hours
> needed to get a calendar for novaromani, compared efforts of the
> money raising of a sum like that.
>
> Vale,
>
>
>
> > Message: 21
> > Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 08:27:04 -0000
> > From: "M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@y...>
> > Subject: Re: about calendars, I could do them if there is interest
> >
> > M. Lucretius Agricola C Curio Saturnino S.P.D.
> >
> > Why would you want to go to all that work? It sounds to me like
> > citizens in Hispania have everything but the backing. Why not bring
> > some funds to the table and ask to join them? I would wager it would
> > save lots of time and work.
> >
> > It sounds to me like the calendar enjoyed a good bit of popularity. I
> > see that it takes some money to get the work done, so why don't we see
> > a group getting together to fund the venture and keep it going? It
> > seems that it may work for other things. It is getting late but it is
> > not yet too late.
>
>
> Caius Curius Saturninus
>
> Tribunus Plebis
> Propraetor Provinciae Thules
> Procurator Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
>
> e-mail: c.curius@a...
> www.academiathules.org
> gsm: +358-50-3315279
> fax: +358-9-8754751
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39274 From: Paolo Eutimo Cristiano Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: about calendars, I could do them if there is interest
Ave o Cato
Scipio Eutimo te salutant

Cato I am interested to your study of the calculation of the roman
year and if you want some aid you make to know me and you will make
what I can in order to help you. excuse for my English but I am using
a simultaneous translator.
Vale mihi frater
(are you american o english?)you have roman-blood in your body
Divo Martiis protegis roman omnes
vale
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39275 From: Nabarz Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: YULE Celebrations: A Mithraic Ritual to the Sun
Hi,

This might be of interest to some based in UK. I hope its ok posting
this here?

Regards,
Nabarz
-------------------------------------------------------------

PF London OPEN RITUAL

**YULE Celebrations: A Mithraic Ritual to the Sun**

Thursday 22nd December 2005, facilitated by `Companions of
Mithras '.


Please Note: This ritual is NOT suitable for small children. Only
11+ year olds will be allowed.

Venue: Conway Hall, Red Lion Square, Holborn, London. Time: 7.30pm
fr 8pm start. (Event ends at 9.45pm) Entrance: £5 (concs £4).

Further info
http://www.pflondon.org/html/future_rituals.html

********************************************************************
The Mysteries of Mithras: The Pagan Belief That Shaped the Christian
World.
http://www.innertraditions.com/isbn/1-59477-027-1
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39276 From: Paolo Eutimo Cristiano Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Ave Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Eutimo Scipio te salutant

i am sorry if I speak badly English but I am using a simultaneous
translator. I wanted to answer on the causes of the fall of the roman
empire: the first and only cause it was and it is the Christian
religion that has manipulated the mind of the roman population, it was
and it is made thirsty of power and it has influenced the minds weak
people of the last emperors,christian religion has abolishing the
pagana religion, the gladiatori games, and the same gladiatori that
were the basis of the invincible defenand after the taxes, to brail
up and injustice, so the badly to govern of the senate and emperors
under infuence of the religion (crhistian) of Rome.

Gods protect us and new roma empire
Vale mihi frater
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39277 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
I FIRMLY believe that when a people lose thier faith
the battles & eventually the nation falls as well. The
scary part is that Christianity is slowly dying...
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<paolocristiano1966@...> wrote:
> Ave Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Eutimo Scipio te salutant
>
> i am sorry if I speak badly English but I am using
a simultaneous
> translator. I wanted to answer on the causes of the
fall of the roman
> empire: the first and only cause it was and it is
the Christian
> religion that has manipulated the mind of the roman
population, it was
> and it is made thirsty of power and it has
influenced the minds weak
> people of the last emperors,christian religion has
abolishing the
> pagana religion, the gladiatori games, and the same
gladiatori that
> were the basis of the invincible defenand after the
taxes, to brail
> up and injustice, so the badly to govern of the
senate and emperors
> under infuence of the religion (crhistian) of Rome.
>
> Gods protect us and new roma empire
> Vale mihi frater
>
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39278 From: lucius_fidelius Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Salve Corneli Malacitane, et Salvete Omnes,

Even today in the mediterranean there are many the are fearful of
the "evil eye" yet that doesn't make them pagans or that they are
continuing any traditions that are beyond the secular. Irish
immigrants brought Halloween traditions to America in the 19th
century- that doesn't prove Celtic paganism existed by then.
Certainly by the 7th century- which constitutes the "Dark Ages" not
the Middle Ages as you asserted in your previous email:

>Druid religion was heavily prosecuted by christians (in some parts
of the former empire, during the begining of the middle age), what
means that did not dissapear on the empire.

there was vestiges of folk beliefs though that hardly constitutes
the Druidism that was known in pre-Christian times.

What you quote from Eligius is common exhortation to Christians,
warning them against continuing pagan customs- it wasn't
a "prosecution" since these were already Christians who demonstrate a
lack of faith in the Christian God. Hence, Eligius was doing his job.
The folk beliefs you quote do not constitute Druidism or even
paganism, but heterodox views of early Christians.

You'd make a better argument to show where Druids were persecuted by
Christians- which you haven't done and I suspect you won't except by
some very liberal stretches of reason because the Druids were
effectively extinguished by the Romans by 61AD as the title of the
BBC article suggests. That some non-Christian beliefs of folk
traditions existed well past then doesn't make the case, because they
still survive (by tradition rather than in modern non-fiction books)
into the 21st century.

Twisting history to conform to this prevalent and flawed ideology
of "Christiani ad leones" doesn't insult Christians, it insults the
work of historians. Is there not enough persecutions by Christians in
the middle ages that you can quote from? Oh wait- it was heterodox
Christians, Jews and Muslims that were persecuted and that doesn't
suit your purposes. Invented history won't suit them either.

Valete,

L. Fidelius Graecus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Santo Orcero <irbis@o...>
wrote:
>
>
>
> Salvete, Omnes!
>
> > They date Druidism to 61AD, very much short of the middle ages
> > according to Malacitanus' deductions- which can led me to my own
> > deductions- that the BBC is conspiring to protect the identity of
the
> > real culprit- King Arthur whom everyone knows from the cartoons
and
> > novels is a tyrant from the middle ages who unified Britain under
his
> > thumb! Those poor humble Druids with their leafy glades,
pacifism,
> > blood-drenched altars and horrific wickermen.
>
> According to Wikipedia, topic druid, section Late Druidic
survivals in
> Flanders:
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> The people of Flanders and the Low Countries remained pagan as late
as the
> 7th century CE, when Saint Eligius travelled from Antwerp to
Frisia,
> preaching and converting them to Christianity. One of the best
glimpses of
> late Druidic practices comes from the Vita of Eligius written by
saint
> Ouen, his contemporary and companion. Ouen drew together the
familiar
> admonitions of Eligius to the pagans in Flanders. "It does not
represent
> anything he said in a particular day in order" Ouen cautioned, "but
is a
> digest of the precepts which he taught the people at all times."
>
>
>
> Eligius in his sermons denounced "sacrilegious pagan customs." The
> following excerpted quotes from Ouen's Vita of Eligius are
instructive,
> for the negative description they offer of some late druidic
practices in
> Flanders:
>
>
> "For no cause or infirmity should you consult magicians, diviners,
> sorcerers or incantators, or presume to question them."
> "Do not observe auguries or violent sneezing or pay attention to
any
> little birds singing along the road. If you are distracted on the
road or
> at any other work, make the sign of the cross and say your Sunday
prayers
> with faith and devotion and nothing inimical can hurt you."
> "No Christian should be concerned about which day he leaves home or
which
> day he returns, because God has made all days. No influence
attaches to
> the first work of the day or the [phase of the] moon; nothing is
ominous
> or ridiculous about the Calends of January [what we would call New
Year's
> Day ].
> "[Do not] make vetulas,*, little deer or iotticos or set tables
[for the
> house-elf, compare Puck] at night or exchange New Years' gifts or
supply
> superfluous drinks [a Yule custom]."
> Vetula, a little figure of the Old Woman. A Roman would have
equated her
> with Hecate, but precisely who the Old Woman was and what she meant
in the
> pagan Low Countries cannot be determined.
>
> "No Christian gives credence to impurity or sits in incantation,
because
> the work is diabolic. No Christian on the feast of Saint John* or
the
> solemnity of any other saint performs solestitia [summer solstice
rites]
> or dancing or leaping or diabolical chants."
> The Christian summer solstice feast of Saint John the Baptist is
still
> celebrated with bonfires on June 24th, though the precession of the
> equinoxes has shifted the actual equinox forward in the calendar.
See
> entry Midsummer.
>
> "No Christian should presume to invoke the name of a demon, not
Neptune or
> Orcus* or Diana or Minerva or Geniscus or believe in these inept
beings in
> any way. No one should observe Jove's day in idleness without holy
> festivities not in May or any other time, not days of larvae** or
mice or
> any day but Sunday. No Christian should make or render any devotion
to the
> gods of the trivium, where three roads meet [cf. Hecate], to the
fanes or
> the rocks, or springs or groves or corners."
> Orcus, a chthonic Etruscan/Roman god of the underworld, who
enforced the
> sacredness of oaths and avenged the broken word. (An essay on
> Hades/Orcus.)
>
> Larvae ("malignant spirits") in this Latin text more specifically
refer to
> the Roman Feast of the Lemures, propitiating the dead, rather than
to the
> Celtic propitiation, which was at Samhain.
>
> "None should presume to hang any phylacteries* from the neck of man
nor
> beast, even if they are made by priests and it is said that they
contain
> holy things and divine scripture, because there is no remedy of
Christ in
> these things but only the devil's poison."
> Gregory of Tours set great store by phylacteries.
>
> "None should presume to make lustrations or incantations with
herbs, or to
> pass cattle through a hollow tree or ditch because this is to
consecrate
> them to the devil. No woman should presume to hang amber from her
neck or
> call upon Minerva or other ill-starred beings in their weaving or
dyeing
> but in all works give thanks only to Christ and confide in the
power of
> his name with all your hearts. None should presume to shout when
the moon
> is obscured, for by God's order eclipses happen at certain times.
Nor
> should they fear the new moon or abandon work because of it. For
God made
> the moon for this, to mark time and temper the darkness of night,
not
> impede work nor make men mad as the foolish imagine, who believe
lunatics
> are invaded by demons from the moon. None should call the sun or
moon lord
> or swear by them because they are God's creatures and they serve
the needs
> of men by God's order."
> "No one should tell fate or fortune or horoscopes by them as those
do who
> believe that a person must be what he was born to be."
> "Above all, should any infirmity occur, do not seek incantators or
> diviners or sorcerers or magicians, do not use diabolic
phylacteries
> through springs and groves or crossroads. But let the invalid
confide
> solely in the mercy of God and take the body and blood of Christ
with
> faith and devotion and ask the church faithfully for blessing and
oil,
> with which he might anoint his body in the name of Christ and,
according
> to the apostle, "the prayer of faith will save the infirm and the
Lord
> will relieve him."
> "Diabolical games and dancing or chants of the gentiles will be
forbidden.
> No Christian will do them because he thus makes himself pagan. Nor
is it
> right that diabolical canticles should proceed from a Christian
mouth
> where the sacrament of Christ is placed, which it becomes always to
praise
> God. Therefore, brothers, spurn all inventions of the enemy with
all your
> heart and flee these sacrileges with all horror. Venerate no
creature
> beyond God and his saints. Shun springs and arbors which they call
sacred.
> You are forbidden to make the crook which they place on the
crossroads and
> wherever you find one you should burn it with fire. For you must
believe
> that you can be saved by no other art than the invocation and cross
of
> Christ. For how will it be if groves where these miserable men make
their
> devotions, are felled and the wood from them given to the furnace?
See how
> foolish man is, to offer honor to insensible, dead trees and
despise the
> precepts of God almighty. Do not believe that the sky or the stars
or the
> earth or any creature should be adored beyond God for he created
and
> disposes of them all."
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Well, or St. Ouen and St Eligius had between their miracles the
time
> traveling, or there were druids in the end of roman empire. Two
both lived
> on Flanders and Low Countries in 7th century, and two both fight
againts
> druidism.
>
>
> Sorry, but in 6th and 7th century it _were_ druids in Britain,
> Flanders and Low Countries inside the empire; and it was the
principal
> religion on some places near the empire -like Ireland-. The action
of
> Christian bishops on some land was against them. No King
> Arthur _ANY_ book of history would clear the hard time for
christian
> bishops in former celtic areas agains druidism. Yes, the druids of
6th
> century was not the same than those who fight against Julius
Caesar. The
> second were warlords, the first were priests of a religion that had
known
> better times.
>
> And the BBC site talks about one age were druids were the rulers,
but I
> can not find exactly in what part of the article you can find that
druids
> dissapeared in 61AD.
>
>
>
> Yours:
>
> Lucius Cornelius Malacitanus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39279 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salvete,

Whenever any society loses its faith it is like losing its compass. It is lost in the ocean of time. You are correct in my opinion Flavius and Cristiano. Western culture and the USA are now quickly losing their faith and culture, soon if this keeps up, it will probably become as extinct as Rome (how Karmic!). The road to hell is indeed paved with good (PC) intentions. As Roman culture succumbed to Christianity and lost its creative force, so is the West now losing its creative force with the loss of Christianity.

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: raymond fuentes
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome


I FIRMLY believe that when a people lose thier faith
the battles & eventually the nation falls as well. The
scary part is that Christianity is slowly dying...
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<paolocristiano1966@...> wrote:
> Ave Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Eutimo Scipio te salutant
>
> i am sorry if I speak badly English but I am using
a simultaneous
> translator. I wanted to answer on the causes of the
fall of the roman
> empire: the first and only cause it was and it is
the Christian
> religion that has manipulated the mind of the roman
population, it was
> and it is made thirsty of power and it has
influenced the minds weak
> people of the last emperors,christian religion has
abolishing the
> pagana religion, the gladiatori games, and the same
gladiatori that
> were the basis of the invincible defenand after the
taxes, to brail
> up and injustice, so the badly to govern of the
senate and emperors
> under infuence of the religion (crhistian) of Rome.
>
> Gods protect us and new roma empire
> Vale mihi frater
>
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.0/168 - Release Date: 11/14/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39280 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes.

"As Roman culture succumbed to Christianity and lost its creative
force..."

What a remarkable statement, Cassius Philippus! You manage to
(unwittingly, I believe) insult Christianity --- Rome was forced to
"succumb" to it --- and ignore the next thousand years of Roman
history, the Byzantine Empire :-)

The glorious explosion of arts, science, literature, and music that
accompanied the rise of the Eastern Empire gives clear testimony to
the vitality and exuberance of that surviving Roman culture --- a
robust, militaristic *Christian* Roman culture. At no time, even
after the language of the court had changed to Greek, did the
Byzantines ever consider themselves anything but Romans --- and the
rest of the world acknowledged them as such, the pretentions of the
Carolingians notwithstanding.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39281 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve Cristiane, et salvete quirites,

Paolo Eutimo Cristiano wrote:

> Ave Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Eutimo Scipio te salutant
>
> i am sorry if I speak badly English but I am using a simultaneous
> translator. I wanted to answer on the causes of the fall of the roman
> empire: the first and only cause it was and it is the Christian
> religion that has manipulated the mind of the roman population,

I can not agree. While the embrace of Christianity was no doubt a
symptom of the problems that Roma faced then, to attribute the fall of
the western Empire entirely to Christianity is to ignore a long list of
other problems.

Gibbon's classic _Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire_ explains what
happened in great detail. I recommend you read it.

Vale, et valete quirites,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39282 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Yes.Its been my understanding that the title Byzantine
was applied by scholars.As a result the end of
Romanitas has always been 476AD.NO knows about the
EAST.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
> OSD C. Equitius Cato
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> "As Roman culture succumbed to Christianity and lost
its creative
> force..."
>
> What a remarkable statement, Cassius Philippus! You
manage to
> (unwittingly, I believe) insult Christianity ---
Rome was forced to
> "succumb" to it --- and ignore the next thousand
years of Roman
> history, the Byzantine Empire :-)
>
> The glorious explosion of arts, science, literature,
and music that
> accompanied the rise of the Eastern Empire gives
clear testimony to
> the vitality and exuberance of that surviving Roman
culture --- a
> robust, militaristic *Christian* Roman culture. At
no time, even
> after the language of the court had changed to
Greek, did the
> Byzantines ever consider themselves anything but
Romans --- and the
> rest of the world acknowledged them as such, the
pretentions of the
> Carolingians notwithstanding.
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39283 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Why M.F.Fides keeps comparing todays Western World W/ ROMA Anti
The similarities are eerie.The uncontrolled incursions
of peoples that cared not for Roma or her institutions
much less her defense was a definiate catalyst.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <gawne@...>
wrote:
> Salve Cristiane, et salvete quirites,
>
> Paolo Eutimo Cristiano wrote:
>
> > Ave Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > Eutimo Scipio te salutant
> >
> > i am sorry if I speak badly English but I am
using a simultaneous
> > translator. I wanted to answer on the causes of
the fall of the roman
> > empire: the first and only cause it was and it
is the Christian
> > religion that has manipulated the mind of the
roman population,
>
> I can not agree. While the embrace of Christianity
was no doubt a
> symptom of the problems that Roma faced then, to
attribute the fall of
> the western Empire entirely to Christianity is to
ignore a long list of
> other problems.
>
> Gibbon's classic _Decline and Fall of the Roman
Empire_ explains what
> happened in great detail. I recommend you read it.
>
> Vale, et valete quirites,
>
> -- Marinus


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39284 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Libatio Iovi
Q. Caecilius Metellus Quiritibus sal.

As was the case last month, so again yesterday, on the Ides, Iuppiter
received a libation, in honor and in the place of the sacrifice he would
regularly receive on the Ides. As always, the text of said libation is
available upon request, in both Latin and English (any other language
might take a bit of work).

Di nos ament!

Quintus Caecilius Metellus
Pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39285 From: Maior Date: 2005-11-14
Subject: Re: Libatio Iovi
M. Hortensia Q. Metellos spd;
it is a fine thing during these Ludi devoted to Iuppiter OP
to see you honoring him Metelle.

Would you please send the text to me. I would like to start too.
Also the Duke pagans are forming and I suggested we celebrate
Saturnalia and I could later also demonstrate this monthly offering
of the Religio. I'll also try to post over at the Classics board.
bene vale in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia


> Q. Caecilius Metellus Quiritibus sal.
>
> As was the case last month, so again yesterday, on the Ides,
Iuppiter
> received a libation, in honor and in the place of the sacrifice he
would
> regularly receive on the Ides. As always, the text of said
libation is
> available upon request, in both Latin and English (any other
language
> might take a bit of work).
>
> Di nos ament!
>
> Quintus Caecilius Metellus
> Pontifex
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39286 From: Maior Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Fortuna's temple
M. Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
yesterday was the feria of Fortuna Primigenia of Praeneste, and
here is a fantastic site with a computer generated plan of the temple
precincts, it it truly fascinating as Sulla built them and it was the
largest temple complex in the entire Republic. There was a famous
oracle which Cicero mentions. So enjoy!

http://australis.www2.50megs.com/Fortuna/Fortuna.html

valete
Marca Hortensia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39287 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: This is Latin, isnt it?
The term Deus Io Volt! Is Latin, isnt it? If not, what
is it?

S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39288 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
The American school system does not help.Kids are
taught that Western civilization is inferior to
wherever it is the kids come from.They thumb noses
more so.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<senseiphil@...> wrote:
> Salve Marinus,
>
> Tell that to the Japanese (even et the present
time), Saudi, and Chinese (and Germans of the 1930's).
They will vehemently disagree. But not to your face!
They are superior and it's because of who and what
they are they are as a society, race and culture or at
least that is how THEY see it!
>
> Vires et honos,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 9:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tenney Frank and the Fall
of Rome
>
>
> Salve Annia Minucia, et salvete quirites,
>
> annia@... wrote:
>
> > I'm curious. Do you deny that before we had such
"melting pot" societies
> > that race was usually a characteristic of
difference cultures?
>
> I think it's reasonable to say that many different
cultures were
> composed predominantly of people who shared a
common ethnicity.
> However, I think it's a mistake to conflate the
characteristics of a
> particular culture with the genetic heritage of
the people in that
> culture. A given cultural group perpetuates
itself via genes which
> carry the genetic coding, and memes which carry
the ideas down through
> the generations.
>
> > And wouldn't
> > these different culture also have different
values?
>
> Possibly, but not necessarily. But we can
postulate this sort of
> variation for the sake of discussion.
>
> > Ina sense, referring to
> > race as the cause could be correct if we assume
race=culture in this
> > context.
>
> But that's just it. Race is NOT culture. Not at
all. To mistake the
> one for the other is to fall into one of the most
egregious errors of
> the past. Strictly speaking, we are all of the
human race. It is a
> flawed interpretation of biology that produced the
notion of different
> skin colors representing different races, and
unfortunately that flawed
> idea has permeated the collective consciousness to
the point where it
> has become generally accepted.
>
> Even by assuming that ethnicity is equal to
culture we stray into
> dangerous territory. Genetic heritage is not the
same as memetic
> heritage.
>
> Vale, et valete quirites,
>
> -- Marinus
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman
empire The fall of the roman empire
> Roman empire
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an
email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39289 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: This is Latin, isnt it?
Salve!

Not sure about the "io" (normally an exclamation of joy), but the rest is
solid Latin! Deus = God; "volt" an alternative form of "vult" (wants). The
only other "Io" I've heard of is that poor young lady that Jupiter turned
into a cow!

Vale bene!

S Pontius Pilatus Barbatus



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of raymond fuentes
Sent: 15 November 2005 06:03
To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] This is Latin, isnt it?



The term Deus Io Volt! Is Latin, isnt it? If not, what
is it?

S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com



SPONSORED LINKS


Ancient
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=F
all+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&
s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ> history

Fall
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+his
tory&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+em
pire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA> of the roman empire

The
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient
+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roma
n+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ> fall of the roman empire


Roman
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall
+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=1
03&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw> empire







_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39290 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Salve Fideli Graece, et salvete omnes

It is an interesting twist, though, with regard to the exortation of
Christians to not continue pagan customs, especially since so many
Christian 'holy days' were based on pagan celebrations and simply given
a new name and raison d'etre. Unless he had been seriously 'born again'
I imagine it would have been extremely hard for the common man to simply
give up doing what he had been doing his entire life!

Vale, et valete

G Licinius Crassus

lucius_fidelius wrote:

> Salve Corneli Malacitane, et Salvete Omnes,
>
> Even today in the mediterranean there are many the are fearful of
> the "evil eye" yet that doesn't make them pagans or that they are
> continuing any traditions that are beyond the secular. Irish
> immigrants brought Halloween traditions to America in the 19th
> century- that doesn't prove Celtic paganism existed by then.
> Certainly by the 7th century- which constitutes the "Dark Ages" not
> the Middle Ages as you asserted in your previous email:
>
> >Druid religion was heavily prosecuted by christians (in some parts
> of the former empire, during the begining of the middle age), what
> means that did not dissapear on the empire.
>
> there was vestiges of folk beliefs though that hardly constitutes
> the Druidism that was known in pre-Christian times.
>
> What you quote from Eligius is common exhortation to Christians,
> warning them against continuing pagan customs- it wasn't
> a "prosecution" since these were already Christians who demonstrate a
> lack of faith in the Christian God. Hence, Eligius was doing his job.
> The folk beliefs you quote do not constitute Druidism or even
> paganism, but heterodox views of early Christians.
>
> You'd make a better argument to show where Druids were persecuted by
> Christians- which you haven't done and I suspect you won't except by
> some very liberal stretches of reason because the Druids were
> effectively extinguished by the Romans by 61AD as the title of the
> BBC article suggests. That some non-Christian beliefs of folk
> traditions existed well past then doesn't make the case, because they
> still survive (by tradition rather than in modern non-fiction books)
> into the 21st century.
>
> Twisting history to conform to this prevalent and flawed ideology
> of "Christiani ad leones" doesn't insult Christians, it insults the
> work of historians. Is there not enough persecutions by Christians in
> the middle ages that you can quote from? Oh wait- it was heterodox
> Christians, Jews and Muslims that were persecuted and that doesn't
> suit your purposes. Invented history won't suit them either.
>
> Valete,
>
> L. Fidelius Graecus
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Santo Orcero <irbis@o...>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Salvete, Omnes!
> >
> > > They date Druidism to 61AD, very much short of the middle ages
> > > according to Malacitanus' deductions- which can led me to my own
> > > deductions- that the BBC is conspiring to protect the identity of
> the
> > > real culprit- King Arthur whom everyone knows from the cartoons
> and
> > > novels is a tyrant from the middle ages who unified Britain under
> his
> > > thumb! Those poor humble Druids with their leafy glades,
> pacifism,
> > > blood-drenched altars and horrific wickermen.
> >
> > According to Wikipedia, topic druid, section Late Druidic
> survivals in
> > Flanders:
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------
> >
> > The people of Flanders and the Low Countries remained pagan as late
> as the
> > 7th century CE, when Saint Eligius travelled from Antwerp to
> Frisia,
> > preaching and converting them to Christianity. One of the best
> glimpses of
> > late Druidic practices comes from the Vita of Eligius written by
> saint
> > Ouen, his contemporary and companion. Ouen drew together the
> familiar
> > admonitions of Eligius to the pagans in Flanders. "It does not
> represent
> > anything he said in a particular day in order" Ouen cautioned, "but
> is a
> > digest of the precepts which he taught the people at all times."
> >
> >
> >
> > Eligius in his sermons denounced "sacrilegious pagan customs." The
> > following excerpted quotes from Ouen's Vita of Eligius are
> instructive,
> > for the negative description they offer of some late druidic
> practices in
> > Flanders:
> >
> >
> > "For no cause or infirmity should you consult magicians, diviners,
> > sorcerers or incantators, or presume to question them."
> > "Do not observe auguries or violent sneezing or pay attention to
> any
> > little birds singing along the road. If you are distracted on the
> road or
> > at any other work, make the sign of the cross and say your Sunday
> prayers
> > with faith and devotion and nothing inimical can hurt you."
> > "No Christian should be concerned about which day he leaves home or
> which
> > day he returns, because God has made all days. No influence
> attaches to
> > the first work of the day or the [phase of the] moon; nothing is
> ominous
> > or ridiculous about the Calends of January [what we would call New
> Year's
> > Day ].
> > "[Do not] make vetulas,*, little deer or iotticos or set tables
> [for the
> > house-elf, compare Puck] at night or exchange New Years' gifts or
> supply
> > superfluous drinks [a Yule custom]."
> > Vetula, a little figure of the Old Woman. A Roman would have
> equated her
> > with Hecate, but precisely who the Old Woman was and what she meant
> in the
> > pagan Low Countries cannot be determined.
> >
> > "No Christian gives credence to impurity or sits in incantation,
> because
> > the work is diabolic. No Christian on the feast of Saint John* or
> the
> > solemnity of any other saint performs solestitia [summer solstice
> rites]
> > or dancing or leaping or diabolical chants."
> > The Christian summer solstice feast of Saint John the Baptist is
> still
> > celebrated with bonfires on June 24th, though the precession of the
> > equinoxes has shifted the actual equinox forward in the calendar.
> See
> > entry Midsummer.
> >
> > "No Christian should presume to invoke the name of a demon, not
> Neptune or
> > Orcus* or Diana or Minerva or Geniscus or believe in these inept
> beings in
> > any way. No one should observe Jove's day in idleness without holy
> > festivities not in May or any other time, not days of larvae** or
> mice or
> > any day but Sunday. No Christian should make or render any devotion
> to the
> > gods of the trivium, where three roads meet [cf. Hecate], to the
> fanes or
> > the rocks, or springs or groves or corners."
> > Orcus, a chthonic Etruscan/Roman god of the underworld, who
> enforced the
> > sacredness of oaths and avenged the broken word. (An essay on
> > Hades/Orcus.)
> >
> > Larvae ("malignant spirits") in this Latin text more specifically
> refer to
> > the Roman Feast of the Lemures, propitiating the dead, rather than
> to the
> > Celtic propitiation, which was at Samhain.
> >
> > "None should presume to hang any phylacteries* from the neck of man
> nor
> > beast, even if they are made by priests and it is said that they
> contain
> > holy things and divine scripture, because there is no remedy of
> Christ in
> > these things but only the devil's poison."
> > Gregory of Tours set great store by phylacteries.
> >
> > "None should presume to make lustrations or incantations with
> herbs, or to
> > pass cattle through a hollow tree or ditch because this is to
> consecrate
> > them to the devil. No woman should presume to hang amber from her
> neck or
> > call upon Minerva or other ill-starred beings in their weaving or
> dyeing
> > but in all works give thanks only to Christ and confide in the
> power of
> > his name with all your hearts. None should presume to shout when
> the moon
> > is obscured, for by God's order eclipses happen at certain times.
> Nor
> > should they fear the new moon or abandon work because of it. For
> God made
> > the moon for this, to mark time and temper the darkness of night,
> not
> > impede work nor make men mad as the foolish imagine, who believe
> lunatics
> > are invaded by demons from the moon. None should call the sun or
> moon lord
> > or swear by them because they are God's creatures and they serve
> the needs
> > of men by God's order."
> > "No one should tell fate or fortune or horoscopes by them as those
> do who
> > believe that a person must be what he was born to be."
> > "Above all, should any infirmity occur, do not seek incantators or
> > diviners or sorcerers or magicians, do not use diabolic
> phylacteries
> > through springs and groves or crossroads. But let the invalid
> confide
> > solely in the mercy of God and take the body and blood of Christ
> with
> > faith and devotion and ask the church faithfully for blessing and
> oil,
> > with which he might anoint his body in the name of Christ and,
> according
> > to the apostle, "the prayer of faith will save the infirm and the
> Lord
> > will relieve him."
> > "Diabolical games and dancing or chants of the gentiles will be
> forbidden.
> > No Christian will do them because he thus makes himself pagan. Nor
> is it
> > right that diabolical canticles should proceed from a Christian
> mouth
> > where the sacrament of Christ is placed, which it becomes always to
> praise
> > God. Therefore, brothers, spurn all inventions of the enemy with
> all your
> > heart and flee these sacrileges with all horror. Venerate no
> creature
> > beyond God and his saints. Shun springs and arbors which they call
> sacred.
> > You are forbidden to make the crook which they place on the
> crossroads and
> > wherever you find one you should burn it with fire. For you must
> believe
> > that you can be saved by no other art than the invocation and cross
> of
> > Christ. For how will it be if groves where these miserable men make
> their
> > devotions, are felled and the wood from them given to the furnace?
> See how
> > foolish man is, to offer honor to insensible, dead trees and
> despise the
> > precepts of God almighty. Do not believe that the sky or the stars
> or the
> > earth or any creature should be adored beyond God for he created
> and
> > disposes of them all."
> > ---------------------------------------
> >
> > Well, or St. Ouen and St Eligius had between their miracles the
> time
> > traveling, or there were druids in the end of roman empire. Two
> both lived
> > on Flanders and Low Countries in 7th century, and two both fight
> againts
> > druidism.
> >
> >
> > Sorry, but in 6th and 7th century it _were_ druids in Britain,
> > Flanders and Low Countries inside the empire; and it was the
> principal
> > religion on some places near the empire -like Ireland-. The action
> of
> > Christian bishops on some land was against them. No King
> > Arthur _ANY_ book of history would clear the hard time for
> christian
> > bishops in former celtic areas agains druidism. Yes, the druids of
> 6th
> > century was not the same than those who fight against Julius
> Caesar. The
> > second were warlords, the first were priests of a religion that had
> known
> > better times.
> >
> > And the BBC site talks about one age were druids were the rulers,
> but I
> > can not find exactly in what part of the article you can find that
> druids
> > dissapeared in 61AD.
> >
> >
> >
> > Yours:
> >
> > Lucius Cornelius Malacitanus
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Ancient history
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ>
> Fall of the roman empire
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA>
> The fall of the roman empire
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ>
>
> Roman empire
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39291 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: This is Latin, isnt it?
>
A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque omnibus, praesertim
Sex. Pontio Pilato Barbato S.P.D.


>
> Salve!
>
> Not sure about the "io" (normally an exclamation of joy), but the rest is
> solid Latin! Deus = God; "volt" an alternative form of "vult" (wants). The
> only other "Io" I've heard of is that poor young lady that Jupiter turned
> into a cow!
>
> ATS: And I suspect that she¹s the very one meant here‹one of my grammars
> lists Io as an alternate accusative singular of this Greek noun borrowed into
> Latin; the OLD confirms this as used by Ouidius.
>
> Vale bene!
>
> S Pontius Pilatus Barbatus
>
> Curate ut ualeatis optime,
>
A. Tullia Scholastica


>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of raymond fuentes
> Sent: 15 November 2005 06:03
> To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] This is Latin, isnt it?
>
>
>
> The term Deus Io Volt! Is Latin, isnt it? If not, what
> is it?
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39292 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: This is Latin, isnt it?
Thank You.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <p.bird@...>
wrote:
> Salve!
>
> Not sure about the "io" (normally an exclamation of
joy), but the rest is
> solid Latin! Deus = God; "volt" an alternative form
of "vult" (wants). The
> only other "Io" I've heard of is that poor young
lady that Jupiter turned
> into a cow!
>
> Vale bene!
>
> S Pontius Pilatus Barbatus
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of raymond fuentes
> Sent: 15 November 2005 06:03
> To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] This is Latin, isnt it?
>
>
>
> The term Deus Io Volt! Is Latin, isnt it? If not,
what
> is it?
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in
one click.
> http://farechase.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
>
>
> Ancient
>
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=F
>
all+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&
> s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ> history
>
> Fall
>
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+his
>
tory&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+em
> pire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA> of the
roman empire
>
> The
>
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient
>
+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roma
> n+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ>
fall of the roman empire
>
>
> Roman
>
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall
>
+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=1
> 03&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw> empire
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>
> * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39293 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve omnes,

True, this seems to be happening- but (NOTE: PLAYING THE DEVIL'S
ADVOCATE) what is the criteria for judging one civilization against
another? Surely everyone recognizes ancient Rome as the greatest single
civilization in history- but there are also the Chinese civilization,
the rise of Islamic nations, the earlier Hellenic civilization, etc.
Just as we can't judge ancient Rome by modern-day standards, we can't
presuppose Western civilization to be any better than any other present
civilization- it's simply comparing apples to oranges. In my opinion,
civilizations aren't inherently any 'better' than others- just different.

One may say, of course, "Muslim nations demean their women" or "The
Chinese murder their own children"...I don't agree with either practice
at all, BUT taken in the context of that particular society's situation
and needs those may be perfectly acceptable behaviors. It doesn't matter
if WE like it or not- it's their ball of wax, not ours. Who is to say
that the Masai of Africa are inferior because they don't have big cities
or scientific geniuses among them? They have a perfectly workable system
that has served them quite well for centuries- without resorting to wars
of conquest or economic blackmail- at a time when many of our own
Western nations are tearing themselves apart from within.

That being said, however, I am proud to be of Germanic descent- the West
has it's problems, but every civilization goes through change over time.
It's just time for that big old Wheel of Fate to keep turning so we see
what happens next!

Valete,

G Licinius Crassus



raymond fuentes wrote:

> The American school system does not help.Kids are
> taught that Western civilization is inferior to
> wherever it is the kids come from.They thumb noses
> more so.
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> <senseiphil@...> wrote:
> > Salve Marinus,
> >
> > Tell that to the Japanese (even et the present
> time), Saudi, and Chinese (and Germans of the 1930's).
> They will vehemently disagree. But not to your face!
> They are superior and it's because of who and what
> they are they are as a society, race and culture or at
> least that is how THEY see it!
> >
> > Vires et honos,
> > Marcus Cassius Philippus
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 9:28 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tenney Frank and the Fall
> of Rome
> >
> >
> > Salve Annia Minucia, et salvete quirites,
> >
> > annia@... wrote:
> >
> > > I'm curious. Do you deny that before we had such
> "melting pot" societies
> > > that race was usually a characteristic of
> difference cultures?
> >
> > I think it's reasonable to say that many different
> cultures were
> > composed predominantly of people who shared a
> common ethnicity.
> > However, I think it's a mistake to conflate the
> characteristics of a
> > particular culture with the genetic heritage of
> the people in that
> > culture. A given cultural group perpetuates
> itself via genes which
> > carry the genetic coding, and memes which carry
> the ideas down through
> > the generations.
> >
> > > And wouldn't
> > > these different culture also have different
> values?
> >
> > Possibly, but not necessarily. But we can
> postulate this sort of
> > variation for the sake of discussion.
> >
> > > Ina sense, referring to
> > > race as the cause could be correct if we assume
> race=culture in this
> > > context.
> >
> > But that's just it. Race is NOT culture. Not at
> all. To mistake the
> > one for the other is to fall into one of the most
> egregious errors of
> > the past. Strictly speaking, we are all of the
> human race. It is a
> > flawed interpretation of biology that produced the
> notion of different
> > skin colors representing different races, and
> unfortunately that flawed
> > idea has permeated the collective consciousness to
> the point where it
> > has become generally accepted.
> >
> > Even by assuming that ethnicity is equal to
> culture we stray into
> > dangerous territory. Genetic heritage is not the
> same as memetic
> > heritage.
> >
> > Vale, et valete quirites,
> >
> > -- Marinus
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman
> empire The fall of the roman empire
> > Roman empire
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
> >
> > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an
> email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> === Message Truncated ===
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Ancient history
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ>
> Fall of the roman empire
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA>
> The fall of the roman empire
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ>
>
> Roman empire
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39294 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: This is Latin, isnt it?
It means God Wills It! Correct?
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <fororom@...>
wrote:
> >
> A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis,
peregrinisque omnibus, praesertim
> Sex. Pontio Pilato Barbato S.P.D.
>
>
> >
> > Salve!
> >
> > Not sure about the "io" (normally an exclamation
of joy), but the rest is
> > solid Latin! Deus = God; "volt" an alternative
form of "vult" (wants).
> The
> > only other "Io" I've heard of is that poor young
lady that Jupiter turned
> > into a cow!
> >
> > ATS: And I suspect that she¹s the very one meant
here‹one of my gram
> mars
> > lists Io as an alternate accusative singular of
this Greek noun borrowed
> into
> > Latin; the OLD confirms this as used by Ouidius.
> >
> > Vale bene!
> >
> > S Pontius Pilatus Barbatus
> >
> > Curate ut ualeatis optime,
> >
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Beh
> alf
> > Of raymond fuentes
> > Sent: 15 November 2005 06:03
> > To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] This is Latin, isnt it?
> >
> >
> >
> > The term Deus Io Volt! Is Latin, isnt it? If not,
what
> > is it?
> >
> > S P Q R
> >
> > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> >
> > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > Roman Citizen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39295 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
When you live in a country that is a patchwork of
people & ideals without a COMMON ground thats not a
nation,its a way station until something better comes
up
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<glcrassus@...> wrote:
> Salve omnes,
>
> True, this seems to be happening- but (NOTE: PLAYING
THE DEVIL'S
> ADVOCATE) what is the criteria for judging one
civilization against
> another? Surely everyone recognizes ancient Rome as
the greatest single
> civilization in history- but there are also the
Chinese civilization,
> the rise of Islamic nations, the earlier Hellenic
civilization, etc.
> Just as we can't judge ancient Rome by modern-day
standards, we can't
> presuppose Western civilization to be any better
than any other present
> civilization- it's simply comparing apples to
oranges. In my opinion,
> civilizations aren't inherently any 'better' than
others- just different.
>
> One may say, of course, "Muslim nations demean their
women" or "The
> Chinese murder their own children"...I don't agree
with either practice
> at all, BUT taken in the context of that particular
society's situation
> and needs those may be perfectly acceptable
behaviors. It doesn't matter
> if WE like it or not- it's their ball of wax, not
ours. Who is to say
> that the Masai of Africa are inferior because they
don't have big cities
> or scientific geniuses among them? They have a
perfectly workable system
> that has served them quite well for centuries-
without resorting to wars
> of conquest or economic blackmail- at a time when
many of our own
> Western nations are tearing themselves apart from
within.
>
> That being said, however, I am proud to be of
Germanic descent- the West
> has it's problems, but every civilization goes
through change over time.
> It's just time for that big old Wheel of Fate to
keep turning so we see
> what happens next!
>
> Valete,
>
> G Licinius Crassus
>
>
>
> raymond fuentes wrote:
>
> > The American school system does not help.Kids are
> > taught that Western civilization is inferior to
> > wherever it is the kids come from.They thumb noses
> > more so.
> > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > <senseiphil@...> wrote:
> > > Salve Marinus,
> > >
> > > Tell that to the Japanese (even et the present
> > time), Saudi, and Chinese (and Germans of the
1930's).
> > They will vehemently disagree. But not to your
face!
> > They are superior and it's because of who and what
> > they are they are as a society, race and culture
or at
> > least that is how THEY see it!
> > >
> > > Vires et honos,
> > > Marcus Cassius Philippus
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 9:28 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tenney Frank and the
Fall
> > of Rome
> > >
> > >
> > > Salve Annia Minucia, et salvete quirites,
> > >
> > > annia@... wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm curious. Do you deny that before we had
such
> > "melting pot" societies
> > > > that race was usually a characteristic of
> > difference cultures?
> > >
> > > I think it's reasonable to say that many
different
> > cultures were
> > > composed predominantly of people who shared a
> > common ethnicity.
> > > However, I think it's a mistake to conflate
the
> > characteristics of a
> > > particular culture with the genetic heritage
of
> > the people in that
> > > culture. A given cultural group perpetuates
> > itself via genes which
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39296 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
If KIDS are taught no nation is better than the
next,what incentive is there to defend what you dont
love?No one wants to assimilate anymore.Thats
DANGEROUS.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<glcrassus@...> wrote:
> Salve omnes,
>
> True, this seems to be happening- but (NOTE: PLAYING
THE DEVIL'S
> ADVOCATE) what is the criteria for judging one
civilization against
> another? Surely everyone recognizes ancient Rome as
the greatest single
> civilization in history- but there are also the
Chinese civilization,
> the rise of Islamic nations, the earlier Hellenic
civilization, etc.
> Just as we can't judge ancient Rome by modern-day
standards, we can't
> presuppose Western civilization to be any better
than any other present
> civilization- it's simply comparing apples to
oranges. In my opinion,
> civilizations aren't inherently any 'better' than
others- just different.
>
> One may say, of course, "Muslim nations demean their
women" or "The
> Chinese murder their own children"...I don't agree
with either practice
> at all, BUT taken in the context of that particular
society's situation
> and needs those may be perfectly acceptable
behaviors. It doesn't matter
> if WE like it or not- it's their ball of wax, not
ours. Who is to say
> that the Masai of Africa are inferior because they
don't have big cities
> or scientific geniuses among them? They have a
perfectly workable system
> that has served them quite well for centuries-
without resorting to wars
> of conquest or economic blackmail- at a time when
many of our own
> Western nations are tearing themselves apart from
within.
>
> That being said, however, I am proud to be of
Germanic descent- the West
> has it's problems, but every civilization goes
through change over time.
> It's just time for that big old Wheel of Fate to
keep turning so we see
> what happens next!
>
> Valete,
>
> G Licinius Crassus
>
>
>
> raymond fuentes wrote:
>
> > The American school system does not help.Kids are
> > taught that Western civilization is inferior to
> > wherever it is the kids come from.They thumb noses
> > more so.
> > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > <senseiphil@...> wrote:
> > > Salve Marinus,
> > >
> > > Tell that to the Japanese (even et the present
> > time), Saudi, and Chinese (and Germans of the
1930's).
> > They will vehemently disagree. But not to your
face!
> > They are superior and it's because of who and what
> > they are they are as a society, race and culture
or at
> > least that is how THEY see it!
> > >
> > > Vires et honos,
> > > Marcus Cassius Philippus
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 9:28 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tenney Frank and the
Fall
> > of Rome
> > >
> > >
> > > Salve Annia Minucia, et salvete quirites,
> > >
> > > annia@... wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm curious. Do you deny that before we had
such
> > "melting pot" societies
> > > > that race was usually a characteristic of
> > difference cultures?
> > >
> > > I think it's reasonable to say that many
different
> > cultures were
> > > composed predominantly of people who shared a
> > common ethnicity.
> > > However, I think it's a mistake to conflate
the
> > characteristics of a
> > > particular culture with the genetic heritage
of
> > the people in that
> > > culture. A given cultural group perpetuates
> > itself via genes which
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39297 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: This is Latin, isn't it?
>
A. Tullia Scholastica M. Flauio Fidei quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
omnibus S.P.D.

>
> It means God Wills It! Correct?
>
>
> ATS: Not as written there‹it means Œgod wants Io.¹ There¹s a very small
> difference between Zeus and Deus, so it may actually be Zeus wants Io...if it
> were ŒGod wants/wills it,¹ it would have to be ŒDeus id/illud vult/volt;¹ the
> Œvolt¹ spelling is archaic, but good Latin. Maybe something was copied
> incorrectly, and id rather than io was meant; as my colleague S.P.P. Barbatus
> noted, io is normally an exclamation of joy, which makes no sense in that
> phrase, but it can also be the nominative, vocative, or variant accusative of
> Io, the object of Zeus¹/Jupiter¹s affections‹and this doesn¹t sound terribly
> Latin either, though it is marginally grammatically correct. It could also be
> very late, archaizing Latin, with a different pronominal object.
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> ATS
>
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <fororom@...>
> wrote:
>>> > >
>> > A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis,
> peregrinisque omnibus, praesertim
>> > Sex. Pontio Pilato Barbato S.P.D.
>> >
>> >
>>> > >
>>> > > Salve!
>>> > >
>>> > > Not sure about the "io" (normally an exclamation
> of joy), but the rest is
>>> > > solid Latin! Deus = God; "volt" an alternative
> form of "vult" (wants).
>> > The
>>> > > only other "Io" I've heard of is that poor young
> lady that Jupiter turned
>>> > > into a cow!
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: And I suspect that she¹s the very one meant
> here‹one of my gram
>> > mars
>>> > > lists Io as an alternate accusative singular of
> this Greek noun borrowed
>> > into
>>> > > Latin; the OLD confirms this as used by Ouidius.
>>> > >
>>> > > Vale bene!
>>> > >
>>> > > S Pontius Pilatus Barbatus
>>> > >
>>> > > Curate ut ualeatis optime,
>>> > >
>> > A. Tullia Scholastica
>> >
>> >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > _____
>>> > >
>>> > > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Beh
>> > alf
>>> > > Of raymond fuentes
>>> > > Sent: 15 November 2005 06:03
>>> > > To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
>>> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] This is Latin, isnt it?
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > The term Deus Io Volt! Is Latin, isnt it? If not,
> what
>>> > > is it?
>>> > >
>>> > > S P Q R
>>> > >
>>> > > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>>> > >
>>> > > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
>>> > > Roman Citizen
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>> >
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39298 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve,

Unfortunately, at times I believe the Balkanization of the US has
already begun! With our current governmental system it seems unlikely
that a real leader will be elected anytime soon; we seem to be *ahem*
lacking in that department lately.

The REAL question is...WWRD? What Would Rome Do?

Vale,

G Licinius Crassus

raymond fuentes wrote:

> When you live in a country that is a patchwork of
> people & ideals without a COMMON ground thats not a
> nation,its a way station until something better comes
> up
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> <glcrassus@...> wrote:
> > Salve omnes,
> >
> > True, this seems to be happening- but (NOTE: PLAYING
> THE DEVIL'S
> > ADVOCATE) what is the criteria for judging one
> civilization against
> > another? Surely everyone recognizes ancient Rome as
> the greatest single
> > civilization in history- but there are also the
> Chinese civilization,
> > the rise of Islamic nations, the earlier Hellenic
> civilization, etc.
> > Just as we can't judge ancient Rome by modern-day
> standards, we can't
> > presuppose Western civilization to be any better
> than any other present
> > civilization- it's simply comparing apples to
> oranges. In my opinion,
> > civilizations aren't inherently any 'better' than
> others- just different.
> >
> > One may say, of course, "Muslim nations demean their
> women" or "The
> > Chinese murder their own children"...I don't agree
> with either practice
> > at all, BUT taken in the context of that particular
> society's situation
> > and needs those may be perfectly acceptable
> behaviors. It doesn't matter
> > if WE like it or not- it's their ball of wax, not
> ours. Who is to say
> > that the Masai of Africa are inferior because they
> don't have big cities
> > or scientific geniuses among them? They have a
> perfectly workable system
> > that has served them quite well for centuries-
> without resorting to wars
> > of conquest or economic blackmail- at a time when
> many of our own
> > Western nations are tearing themselves apart from
> within.
> >
> > That being said, however, I am proud to be of
> Germanic descent- the West
> > has it's problems, but every civilization goes
> through change over time.
> > It's just time for that big old Wheel of Fate to
> keep turning so we see
> > what happens next!
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > G Licinius Crassus
> >
> >
> >
> > raymond fuentes wrote:
> >
> > > The American school system does not help.Kids are
> > > taught that Western civilization is inferior to
> > > wherever it is the kids come from.They thumb noses
> > > more so.
> > > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > <senseiphil@...> wrote:
> > > > Salve Marinus,
> > > >
> > > > Tell that to the Japanese (even et the present
> > > time), Saudi, and Chinese (and Germans of the
> 1930's).
> > > They will vehemently disagree. But not to your
> face!
> > > They are superior and it's because of who and what
> > > they are they are as a society, race and culture
> or at
> > > least that is how THEY see it!
> > > >
> > > > Vires et honos,
> > > > Marcus Cassius Philippus
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 9:28 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tenney Frank and the
> Fall
> > > of Rome
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve Annia Minucia, et salvete quirites,
> > > >
> > > > annia@... wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm curious. Do you deny that before we had
> such
> > > "melting pot" societies
> > > > > that race was usually a characteristic of
> > > difference cultures?
> > > >
> > > > I think it's reasonable to say that many
> different
> > > cultures were
> > > > composed predominantly of people who shared a
> > > common ethnicity.
> > > > However, I think it's a mistake to conflate
> the
> > > characteristics of a
> > > > particular culture with the genetic heritage
> of
> > > the people in that
> > > > culture. A given cultural group perpetuates
> > > itself via genes which
> === Message Truncated ===
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
> http://farechase.yahoo.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39299 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Rome eventually enfranchised all who fell under her
authority,we saw how well that went.LOL. I say for the
U S, limit legal & HALT illegal immigration.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<glcrassus@...> wrote:
> Salve,
>
> Unfortunately, at times I believe the Balkanization
of the US has
> already begun! With our current governmental system
it seems unlikely
> that a real leader will be elected anytime soon; we
seem to be *ahem*
> lacking in that department lately.
>
> The REAL question is...WWRD? What Would Rome Do?
>
> Vale,
>
> G Licinius Crassus
>
> raymond fuentes wrote:
>
> > When you live in a country that is a patchwork of
> > people & ideals without a COMMON ground thats not
a
> > nation,its a way station until something better
comes
> > up
> > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > <glcrassus@...> wrote:
> > > Salve omnes,
> > >
> > > True, this seems to be happening- but (NOTE:
PLAYING
> > THE DEVIL'S
> > > ADVOCATE) what is the criteria for judging one
> > civilization against
> > > another? Surely everyone recognizes ancient Rome
as
> > the greatest single
> > > civilization in history- but there are also the
> > Chinese civilization,
> > > the rise of Islamic nations, the earlier
Hellenic
> > civilization, etc.
> > > Just as we can't judge ancient Rome by
modern-day
> > standards, we can't
> > > presuppose Western civilization to be any better
> > than any other present
> > > civilization- it's simply comparing apples to
> > oranges. In my opinion,
> > > civilizations aren't inherently any 'better'
than
> > others- just different.
> > >
> > > One may say, of course, "Muslim nations demean
their
> > women" or "The
> > > Chinese murder their own children"...I don't
agree
> > with either practice
> > > at all, BUT taken in the context of that
particular
> > society's situation
> > > and needs those may be perfectly acceptable
> > behaviors. It doesn't matter
> > > if WE like it or not- it's their ball of wax,
not
> > ours. Who is to say
> > > that the Masai of Africa are inferior because
they
> > don't have big cities
> > > or scientific geniuses among them? They have a
> > perfectly workable system
> > > that has served them quite well for centuries-
> > without resorting to wars
> > > of conquest or economic blackmail- at a time
when
> > many of our own
> > > Western nations are tearing themselves apart
from
> > within.
> > >
> > > That being said, however, I am proud to be of
> > Germanic descent- the West
> > > has it's problems, but every civilization goes
> > through change over time.
> > > It's just time for that big old Wheel of Fate to
> > keep turning so we see
> > > what happens next!
> > >
> > > Valete,
> > >
> > > G Licinius Crassus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > raymond fuentes wrote:
> > >
> > > > The American school system does not help.Kids
are
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39300 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
Ahhhh- but I didn't say NATIONS were no better than another. The
question was regarding civilizaztions proper. Of course, some nations
are better than others depending on your point of view- some have
excellent geography, some have vast natural resources, some have managed
to cultivate a decent society- all of these factors, and more, go into
making a NATION great. That doesn't necessarily translate to the
civilization itself, though. We have Western nations that have a poor
standard of living compared to the US- it doesn't make them any less
civilized, only poorer. They are still heirs to Western civilization,
regardless of whether their individual nation is desireable to live in.

And what is wrong with NOT assimilating? That is a question best left to
individual nations- they have the choice of enforcing 'conformity' to
their way of life, or letting the nation divide itself daily. If I want
to live somewhere, but I have to adopt a foreign culture, I might think
twice about giving up my heritage and consider an alternate plan. On the
other hand, if I go to a nation that has set language standards (for
instance) but I don't want to learn the official language, I shouldn't
expect preferential treatment. By making the choice NOT to assimilate, I
make myself an outsider in that hypothetical land.

Vale,

G Licinius Crassus





raymond fuentes wrote:

> If KIDS are taught no nation is better than the
> next,what incentive is there to defend what you dont
> love?No one wants to assimilate anymore.Thats
> DANGEROUS.
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> <glcrassus@...> wrote:
> > Salve omnes,
> >
> > True, this seems to be happening- but (NOTE: PLAYING
> THE DEVIL'S
> > ADVOCATE) what is the criteria for judging one
> civilization against
> > another? Surely everyone recognizes ancient Rome as
> the greatest single
> > civilization in history- but there are also the
> Chinese civilization,
> > the rise of Islamic nations, the earlier Hellenic
> civilization, etc.
> > Just as we can't judge ancient Rome by modern-day
> standards, we can't
> > presuppose Western civilization to be any better
> than any other present
> > civilization- it's simply comparing apples to
> oranges. In my opinion,
> > civilizations aren't inherently any 'better' than
> others- just different.
> >
> > One may say, of course, "Muslim nations demean their
> women" or "The
> > Chinese murder their own children"...I don't agree
> with either practice
> > at all, BUT taken in the context of that particular
> society's situation
> > and needs those may be perfectly acceptable
> behaviors. It doesn't matter
> > if WE like it or not- it's their ball of wax, not
> ours. Who is to say
> > that the Masai of Africa are inferior because they
> don't have big cities
> > or scientific geniuses among them? They have a
> perfectly workable system
> > that has served them quite well for centuries-
> without resorting to wars
> > of conquest or economic blackmail- at a time when
> many of our own
> > Western nations are tearing themselves apart from
> within.
> >
> > That being said, however, I am proud to be of
> Germanic descent- the West
> > has it's problems, but every civilization goes
> through change over time.
> > It's just time for that big old Wheel of Fate to
> keep turning so we see
> > what happens next!
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > G Licinius Crassus
> >
> >
> >
> > raymond fuentes wrote:
> >
> > > The American school system does not help.Kids are
> > > taught that Western civilization is inferior to
> > > wherever it is the kids come from.They thumb noses
> > > more so.
> > > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > <senseiphil@...> wrote:
> > > > Salve Marinus,
> > > >
> > > > Tell that to the Japanese (even et the present
> > > time), Saudi, and Chinese (and Germans of the
> 1930's).
> > > They will vehemently disagree. But not to your
> face!
> > > They are superior and it's because of who and what
> > > they are they are as a society, race and culture
> or at
> > > least that is how THEY see it!
> > > >
> > > > Vires et honos,
> > > > Marcus Cassius Philippus
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 9:28 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tenney Frank and the
> Fall
> > > of Rome
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve Annia Minucia, et salvete quirites,
> > > >
> > > > annia@... wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm curious. Do you deny that before we had
> such
> > > "melting pot" societies
> > > > > that race was usually a characteristic of
> > > difference cultures?
> > > >
> > > > I think it's reasonable to say that many
> different
> > > cultures were
> > > > composed predominantly of people who shared a
> > > common ethnicity.
> > > > However, I think it's a mistake to conflate
> the
> > > characteristics of a
> > > > particular culture with the genetic heritage
> of
> > > the people in that
> > > > culture. A given cultural group perpetuates
> > > itself via genes which
> === Message Truncated ===
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
> http://farechase.yahoo.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39301 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Ave Paolo,

You got your message across very well. Keep practicing and you shall
get better and better.

I have read many people in the last years thought the fall of Rome
was because of the new religion. If only things were that simple but
they are not and here is why:

1) There were many great empires before Rome that kept their gods to
the end: Egypt, Assyria, Persia, Greece as well as Empires in China
and Asia. Not even hearing of Christianity they rose and fell anyway.

2) Republican Rome fell about 80 years before the first wanderings
of Christ.

3) Judea / Isreal fell several times according to her prophets for
not keeping their covenant with God, years before Christianity.

4) Now that Christianity triumphed, it seems that the God of Yaweh
may have not cared too much for the new Christian countries since
Muhammed began to preach and successfully spread Islam from Arabia
to Spain.

5) Allah let Islam reign supreme for a time but then the pagan
Mongols trounced the land of The Arabian Nights, a blow which never
recovered. The Ottoman empire grew again, took the Christian
Byzantine Empire in 1453. 450 years later the infidel General
Alleby marched into the middle East lost by the Ottomans and there
they stayed a generation by mandate and Islamic countries have lost
many wars for years. Yes, some elements blame this on abandoning
Allah's rules and virtues as some Romans do with respect to the gods
but the mosques are full and have 1.2 billion followers and growing
fast. Well where are the rewards prosperity and Caliphate of thw
world?

6) Christianity made very poor inroads into Asia and East Asia yet
where were their gods or Allah in Indonesia?

7) Though the Aztecs in Mexico fell to cross carying Spanish, other
societies and empires such as the Toltecs, Mayans, Zapatecas etc
decayed on their own or were swallowed up by the Aztecs and Incas
before Christianity arrived.


I could go on and on Paolo but I do not see Christianity as that
important a criteria with regards to the fall of Rome. All empires
seem to rise, reach a peak, decay and fall due to over expansion,
greed, mal administration, letting commercial and military
technology pass them by and finding the cost and trouble going into
their colonies becomes far more than what they can take out.
New powers come into being either walking over or displacing them
and thus starting the whole cycle again.

In the "material" sense, where are the gods or God when you need
them? Personally they all seem to care little "if" one buys that
idea.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Paolo Eutimo Cristiano"
<paolocristiano1966@y...> wrote:
>
> Ave Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Eutimo Scipio te salutant
>
> i am sorry if I speak badly English but I am using a
simultaneous
> translator. I wanted to answer on the causes of the fall of the
roman
> empire: the first and only cause it was and it is the Christian
> religion that has manipulated the mind of the roman population, it
was
> and it is made thirsty of power and it has influenced the minds
weak
> people of the last emperors,christian religion has abolishing the
> pagana religion, the gladiatori games, and the same gladiatori
that
> were the basis of the invincible defenand after the taxes, to
brail
> up and injustice, so the badly to govern of the senate and
emperors
> under infuence of the religion (crhistian) of Rome.
>
> Gods protect us and new roma empire
> Vale mihi frater
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39302 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
Im Puerto Rican by birth but American FIRST &
FOREMOST.In N.Y. if you say youre proud to be American
youll get dirty looks & tons of folks saying theyre
not.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<glcrassus@...> wrote:
> Ahhhh- but I didn't say NATIONS were no better than
another. The
> question was regarding civilizaztions proper. Of
course, some nations
> are better than others depending on your point of
view- some have
> excellent geography, some have vast natural
resources, some have managed
> to cultivate a decent society- all of these factors,
and more, go into
> making a NATION great. That doesn't necessarily
translate to the
> civilization itself, though. We have Western nations
that have a poor
> standard of living compared to the US- it doesn't
make them any less
> civilized, only poorer. They are still heirs to
Western civilization,
> regardless of whether their individual nation is
desireable to live in.
>
> And what is wrong with NOT assimilating? That is a
question best left to
> individual nations- they have the choice of
enforcing 'conformity' to
> their way of life, or letting the nation divide
itself daily. If I want
> to live somewhere, but I have to adopt a foreign
culture, I might think
> twice about giving up my heritage and consider an
alternate plan. On the
> other hand, if I go to a nation that has set
language standards (for
> instance) but I don't want to learn the official
language, I shouldn't
> expect preferential treatment. By making the choice
NOT to assimilate, I
> make myself an outsider in that hypothetical land.
>
> Vale,
>
> G Licinius Crassus
>
>
>
>
>
> raymond fuentes wrote:
>
> > If KIDS are taught no nation is better than the
> > next,what incentive is there to defend what you
dont
> > love?No one wants to assimilate anymore.Thats
> > DANGEROUS.
> > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > <glcrassus@...> wrote:
> > > Salve omnes,
> > >
> > > True, this seems to be happening- but (NOTE:
PLAYING
> > THE DEVIL'S
> > > ADVOCATE) what is the criteria for judging one
> > civilization against
> > > another? Surely everyone recognizes ancient Rome
as
> > the greatest single
> > > civilization in history- but there are also the
> > Chinese civilization,
> > > the rise of Islamic nations, the earlier
Hellenic
> > civilization, etc.
> > > Just as we can't judge ancient Rome by
modern-day
> > standards, we can't
> > > presuppose Western civilization to be any better
> > than any other present
> > > civilization- it's simply comparing apples to
> > oranges. In my opinion,
> > > civilizations aren't inherently any 'better'
than
> > others- just different.
> > >
> > > One may say, of course, "Muslim nations demean
their
> > women" or "The
> > > Chinese murder their own children"...I don't
agree
> > with either practice
> > > at all, BUT taken in the context of that
particular
> > society's situation
> > > and needs those may be perfectly acceptable
> > behaviors. It doesn't matter
> > > if WE like it or not- it's their ball of wax,
not
> > ours. Who is to say
> > > that the Masai of Africa are inferior because
they
> > don't have big cities
> > > or scientific geniuses among them? They have a
> > perfectly workable system
> > > that has served them quite well for centuries-
> > without resorting to wars
> > > of conquest or economic blackmail- at a time
when
> > many of our own
> > > Western nations are tearing themselves apart
from
> > within.
> > >
> > > That being said, however, I am proud to be of
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39303 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salvete Omnes,

I come before you to ring a bell I have rung before, and sadly that I
expect I will ring again.


To all posters here, please qualify your statements.

If you are expressing an opinion, please clearly state that. If you
are talking about a particular place or situation, or if you have
specific examples in mind, please say so.

As an example, and not to point fingers, really, I would say that
"Kids are taught that Western civilization is inferior to wherever it
is the kids come from." is almost certainly untrue. As a generic
statement it needs only a single counterexample to be untrue, and I'm
sure that at least one example of a teacher who does not teach that
Western civilization is inferior does exits.


So please, if these sorts of discussions are to have any value, lets
avoid expressing opinions as facts, and lets back up statements with
examples.


It is not my plan to squelch any discussions, but a little precision
will really help things along.




Ago vobis gratias multas

M. Lucretius Agricola



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
>
> The American school system does not help.Kids are
> taught that Western civilization is inferior to
> wherever it is the kids come from.They thumb noses
> more so.
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> <senseiphil@n...> wrote:
> > Salve Marinus,
> >
> > Tell that to the Japanese (even et the present
> time), Saudi, and Chinese (and Germans of the 1930's).
> They will vehemently disagree. But not to your face!
> They are superior and it's because of who and what
> they are they are as a society, race and culture or at
> least that is how THEY see it!
> >
> > Vires et honos,
> > Marcus Cassius Philippus
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 9:28 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tenney Frank and the Fall
> of Rome
> >
> >
> > Salve Annia Minucia, et salvete quirites,
> >
> > annia@c... wrote:
> >
> > > I'm curious. Do you deny that before we had such
> "melting pot" societies
> > > that race was usually a characteristic of
> difference cultures?
> >
> > I think it's reasonable to say that many different
> cultures were
> > composed predominantly of people who shared a
> common ethnicity.
> > However, I think it's a mistake to conflate the
> characteristics of a
> > particular culture with the genetic heritage of
> the people in that
> > culture. A given cultural group perpetuates
> itself via genes which
> > carry the genetic coding, and memes which carry
> the ideas down through
> > the generations.
> >
> > > And wouldn't
> > > these different culture also have different
> values?
> >
> > Possibly, but not necessarily. But we can
> postulate this sort of
> > variation for the sake of discussion.
> >
> > > Ina sense, referring to
> > > race as the cause could be correct if we assume
> race=culture in this
> > > context.
> >
> > But that's just it. Race is NOT culture. Not at
> all. To mistake the
> > one for the other is to fall into one of the most
> egregious errors of
> > the past. Strictly speaking, we are all of the
> human race. It is a
> > flawed interpretation of biology that produced the
> notion of different
> > skin colors representing different races, and
> unfortunately that flawed
> > idea has permeated the collective consciousness to
> the point where it
> > has become generally accepted.
> >
> > Even by assuming that ethnicity is equal to
> culture we stray into
> > dangerous territory. Genetic heritage is not the
> same as memetic
> > heritage.
> >
> > Vale, et valete quirites,
> >
> > -- Marinus
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman
> empire The fall of the roman empire
> > Roman empire
> >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
> >
> > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an
> email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> === Message Truncated ===
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39304 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
>

[snip]

> No one wants to assimilate anymore.

[snip]


Salve amice,

I beg to differ. Adult English classes in Southern California are
always full and nearly always have long waiting lists. I did part of
my ESL training at a school that had a strict attendance policy. A
student who missed class twice was expelled from the session and a new
student was ALWAYS waiting to fill the empty seat.

Our students came from all over the world. A great many went on to
study for and pass the citizenship exam.

I admit, this was ten years ago, and things may have changed since
then. I also admit that my students didn't want to abandon their own
cultures, they wanted to add "American" to the list of things they
already were.

Optime vale et valete

M. Lucretius Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39305 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: This is Latin, isnt it?
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes.

The expression "Deus le/lo vult!" was used by Crusaders in the 11th
and 12th centuries A.D. as a battle cry --- "God wills it!" --- in the
assault on the Holy Land to recover the areas sacred to Christians,
primarily Jerusalem and the Holy Sepulchre.

Another catchy one was "HEP! HEP!", which stood for "Hierosolyma est
Perdita!" --- "Jerusalem is lost!" --- and was generally used when
slaughtering Jews and/or Moslems in the cities and towns between
France and Palestine. Even as late as the 19th century A.D.,
antisemitic rioters in Europe often shouted "Hep! Hep!" while on the
prowl for Jews. Mob harrassment of Jews in Hamburg, Frankfurt, and
other German cities in 1819, in fact, became known as the "Hep! Hep!"
Riots.

see: http://www.jewishgates.com/file.asp?File_ID=80

From this acronym many scholars believe we get the current "hip hip
hooray".

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39306 From: David Santo Orcero Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Salve, Fidelius Graecus, et Salvete Omnes,


> there was vestiges of folk beliefs though that hardly constitutes
> the Druidism that was known in pre-Christian times.

Well, they call themselves druids. As I said on my message, the religions
evolved and the last druids in roman empire were pacific priest and judges
on non-death penalty causes. It is of common sense that the warlords of
Gallii wars did not exists on 6th century, but I am not talking about it,
but the presence of a particular religion and its priests.

> What you quote from Eligius is common exhortation to Christians,
> warning them against continuing pagan customs

Sorry, but St. Eligius and St. Ouen were famous for his preaches against
druidical movement. This is part of one of his preaches. But you know how
those things works, only renember the history of the bishop Cirilus and
Hypatia.

> some very liberal stretches of reason because the Druids were
> effectively extinguished by the Romans by 61AD as the title of the
> BBC article suggests.

What sugests for me (ok, english is not my mother tonge, but it is only
an opinion) is that in 61AD they were defeated, and the age where they
were the leaded political power in britain passed. By I can not find
anything like "druidism dissapeared as a religion" or "all druids of thhe
empire were killed". And the druidism was not stronger on Britain, but in
Flanders.


> Twisting history to conform to this prevalent and flawed ideology
> of "Christiani ad leones" doesn't insult Christians, it insults the
> work of historians.

8-O

I am not historian. I only know what I was taugh at school. Things like
"the roman has no special interest on convert to their religion those who
invaded" and "It was frequent the romans took forgeiner gods and show
respect to them". This was taught to me showing as an example that the
most of the deities of Rome were taken from the greeks and from easten
cults.
(The main cult in Roma between the romae, in republic and in empire were
for the lares and the penates, at home, where the priest was the Pater
familias, and was celebrated in lararium. The triad cult ( Juno, Minerva,
and Jupiter) and later the Imperator cult were a social cult, less
practicated in the interior of the houses. I suppose that I have to say
this because I suspect that we have studied a completly different history)

I renember for the school that the druids were mighty between the celts,
and were warlords. After the defeat, they became priest and peace judges.
They faded during centuries, and in some part of the empire stayed
(mostly Flanders and other part of Lower Countries) still the Christianism
were compulsory.

By the way, In which part of my message there were lions? On the same
paragraph of King Arthur?


> Is there not enough persecutions by Christians in
> the middle ages that you can quote from? Oh wait- it was heterodox
> Christians, Jews and Muslims that were persecuted and that doesn't
> suit your purposes. Invented history won't suit them either.

8-O

No hidden agenda. This began because somebody said that budism and
hinduism have apported nothing to the humanity, I responded that they
apported not to make "convert or die wars", then put an example the
belicity of a budist country against another budist country. Then I put as
a clear irony -or I thought so- of a war that I though that was clearly
not religious, no matter that the religion of the fighters were different:
Roma agains gallii; because people here are expected to know the deep
roots of the anger of Romans against Gallii. I supposed that I was wrong,
and It was only a crusade against druid to convert to Romans' religion, as
some of the people of this mailing list suggest.

A couple of messages later, I had discovered that the Roman began a
proseletist holy war against a troupe of pacifical new age druids, and
exterminate them in Galia, and then jump to Britannia to finish their
work. I find myself that the themselves called "druids" of 6th
and 7th century of Flanders and Low Countries against who St. Ouen and St
Eligius predicate were really executed in 64BC.

Yours:

Lucius Cornelius Malacitanus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39307 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: a.d. XVII Kal. Dec.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem XVII Kalendas Decembris; haec dies comitialis est.

"The Samnite war, the sudden dejection of the Lucanians, and the fact
that the Tarentines had been the instigators were quite sufficient in
themselves to cause the senators anxiety. Fresh trouble, however,
arose this year through the action of the Vestinians, who made common
cause with the Samnites. The matter had been a good deal discussed,
though it had not yet occupied the attention of the government. In the
following year, however, the new consuls, L. Furius Camillus and
Junius Brutus Scaeva, made it the very first question to bring before
the senate. Though the subject was no new one, yet it was felt to be
so serious that the senators shrank from either taking it up or
refusing to deal with it. They were afraid that if they left that
nation unpunished, the neighbouring states might be encouraged to make
a similar display of wanton arrogance, while to punish them by force
of arms might lead others to fear similar treatment and arouse
feelings of resentment. In fact, the whole of these nations-the Marsi,
the Paeligni, and the Marrucini-were quite as warlike as the Samnites,
and in case the Vestinians were attacked would have to be reckoned
with as enemies. The victory, however, rested with that party in the
senate who seemed at the time to possess more daring than prudence,
but the result showed that Fortune favours the bold. The people, with
the sanction of the senate, resolved on war with the Vestinians. The
conduct of that war fell by lot to Brutus, the war in Samnium to
Camillus. Armies were marched into both countries, and by carefully
watching the frontiers the enemy were prevented from effecting a
junction. The consul who had the heavier task, L. Furius, was
overtaken by a serious illness and was obliged to resign his command.
He was ordered to nominate a Dictator to carry on the campaign, and he
nominated L. Papirius Cursor, the foremost soldier of his day, Q.
Fabius Maximus Rullianus being appointed Master of the Horse. The two
distinguished themselves by their conduct in the field, but they made
themselves still more famous by the conflict which broke out between
them, and which almost led to fatal consequences. The other consul,
Brutus, carried on an active campaign amongst the Vestinians without
meeting with a single reverse. He ravaged the fields and burnt the
farm buildings and crops of enemy, and at last drove him reluctantly
into action. A pitched battle was fought, and he inflicted such a
defeat on the Vestinians, though with heavy loss on his own side also,
that they fled to their camp, but not feeling sufficiently protected
by fosse and rampart they dispersed in scattered parties to their
towns, trusting to their strong positions and stone walls for their
defence. Brutus now commenced an attack upon their towns. The first to
be taken was Cutina, which he carried by escalade, after a hot assault
by his men, who were eager to avenge the heavy losses they had
sustained in the previous battle. This was followed by the capture of
Cingilia. He gave the spoil of both cities to his troops as a reward
for their having surmounted the walls and gates of the enemy." - Livy,
History of Rome 8.29


Today is the festival of Shichigosan in Japan. Shichigosan literally
means "seven-five-three"; the ceremony is performed in families who
have daughters of seven, sons of five, and sons and daughters of three
years of age. The children are taken to shrines to to drive out evil
spirits and receive the blessings of the deities. Odd numbers are
considered lucky numbers. Candy in bags that are decorated with
turtles and cranes are given to the children. The candy, the crane and
the turtle all symbolize longevity. It is one of the few occasions
these days on which many Japanese women wear the kimono.


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy, Shichigosan (http://www.japan-guide.com/e/e2284.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39308 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: This is Latin, isnt it?
CN·SALVIVS·ASTVR·S·P·D

M. Flavius scripsit:

> The term Deus Io Volt! Is Latin, isnt it? If not, what
> is it?

Is it Latin? Depending on how lax you are in defining what "Latin" is...

Although I am by no means an expert in Mediaeval Romance languages,
after having read some "cansons de troubadour" in their original
language, to me it sounds like 12th or 13th century Provençal -- a
Romance language spoken in Southern France which was culturally very
important during the Middle Ages.

Of course, it means: "God Wants It!"

Probably, it is be quite similar to what the crowd in Clermont-Ferrand
(yes; that's the South of France) must have shouted after pope Urban
II requested knights to fight in Palestine in 1095...

S·V·B·E·E·V

CN·SALVIVS·T·F·A·NEP·OVF·ASTVR·SCRIPSIT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39309 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII - QUIZ - DAY 5 - Answers
Salve

Answers fo rteh last round of the quiz

13) Carmentes were two goddesses one named Postverta, and the other
Porrima. In another tradition, the Carmentes is just another way to
refer to Carmenta, a single goddess to whom one refers in a plural way
to indicate the fact she had a double nature, being able to look in
the past and in the future,

14) the Navalia, the Shypyards of Rome

15) the Classicum (and so meone went so far to point out that the
trumpe was called Bucina)

Soon teh final ranking!

Valete


Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis Iterum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39310 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII - QUIZ - FINAL RANKING
Salve

Here's the final ranking for teh Quiz game of the Ludii Plebeii

12 - Tita Artoria Marcella
9 - Titus Iulius Sabinus
2 - G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana
1 - Quintus Suetonius Paulinus


Congratulations to Tita Artoria Marcella for her victory, an even more
impressive result coming from a prospective citizen who, I'm sure,
shall not have any problem with her citizenship test! That's the
spirit.

Thank you to all the ones who felt like participating, and I hope the
low participation was not caused by an excessive difficulty of the
questions...

Untill next time!

valete

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis Iterum
>


--
Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis Iterum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39311 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: LUDI PLEBEII - QUIZ - FINAL RANKING
AVE TRIBUNE !

And I want to thank you for your excellent questions. Your certamen
represent a new ocassion to learn more.
Congratulations, Artoria Marcella ! A nice job. And it wasn't easy,
I know that very well !

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
<dom.con.fus@g...> wrote:
>
> Salve
>
> Here's the final ranking for teh Quiz game of the Ludii Plebeii
>
> 12 - Tita Artoria Marcella
> 9 - Titus Iulius Sabinus
> 2 - G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana
> 1 - Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>
>
> Congratulations to Tita Artoria Marcella for her victory, an even
more
> impressive result coming from a prospective citizen who, I'm sure,
> shall not have any problem with her citizenship test! That's the
> spirit.
>
> Thank you to all the ones who felt like participating, and I hope
the
> low participation was not caused by an excessive difficulty of the
> questions...
>
> Untill next time!
>
> valete
>
> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
>
> Founder of Gens Constantinia
> Tribunus Plebis
> Aedilis Urbis Iterum
> >
>
>
> --
> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
>
> Founder of Gens Constantinia
> Tribunus Plebis
> Aedilis Urbis Iterum
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39312 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
I take it back for the rest of the U S. I can speak
for the NYC school system as my better half teaches or
should I say- is forced to distribute this doctrine.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <wm_hogue@...>
wrote:
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> I come before you to ring a bell I have rung before,
and sadly that I
> expect I will ring again.
>
>
> To all posters here, please qualify your statements.
>
> If you are expressing an opinion, please clearly
state that. If you
> are talking about a particular place or situation,
or if you have
> specific examples in mind, please say so.
>
> As an example, and not to point fingers, really, I
would say that
> "Kids are taught that Western civilization is
inferior to wherever it
> is the kids come from." is almost certainly untrue.
As a generic
> statement it needs only a single counterexample to
be untrue, and I'm
> sure that at least one example of a teacher who does
not teach that
> Western civilization is inferior does exits.
>
>
> So please, if these sorts of discussions are to have
any value, lets
> avoid expressing opinions as facts, and lets back up
statements with
> examples.
>
>
> It is not my plan to squelch any discussions, but a
little precision
> will really help things along.
>
>
>
>
> Ago vobis gratias multas
>
> M. Lucretius Agricola
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
> <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> >
> > The American school system does not help.Kids are
> > taught that Western civilization is inferior to
> > wherever it is the kids come from.They thumb noses
> > more so.
> > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > <senseiphil@n...> wrote:
> > > Salve Marinus,
> > >
> > > Tell that to the Japanese (even et the present
> > time), Saudi, and Chinese (and Germans of the
1930's).
> > They will vehemently disagree. But not to your
face!
> > They are superior and it's because of who and what
> > they are they are as a society, race and culture
or at
> > least that is how THEY see it!
> > >
> > > Vires et honos,
> > > Marcus Cassius Philippus
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 9:28 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tenney Frank and the
Fall
> > of Rome
> > >
> > >
> > > Salve Annia Minucia, et salvete quirites,
> > >
> > > annia@c... wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm curious. Do you deny that before we had
such
> > "melting pot" societies
> > > > that race was usually a characteristic of
> > difference cultures?
> > >
> > > I think it's reasonable to say that many
different
> > cultures were
> > > composed predominantly of people who shared a
> > common ethnicity.
> > > However, I think it's a mistake to conflate
the
> > characteristics of a
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39313 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
I agree,10 years ago I saw folks striving to
adapt.They no longer do,its dismaying to me.I
sometimes call it the NAFTA effect because the two
seem to coincide.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <wm_hogue@...>
wrote:
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
> <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> >
>
> [snip]
>
> > No one wants to assimilate anymore.
>
> [snip]
>
>
> Salve amice,
>
> I beg to differ. Adult English classes in Southern
California are
> always full and nearly always have long waiting
lists. I did part of
> my ESL training at a school that had a strict
attendance policy. A
> student who missed class twice was expelled from the
session and a new
> student was ALWAYS waiting to fill the empty seat.
>
> Our students came from all over the world. A great
many went on to
> study for and pass the citizenship exam.
>
> I admit, this was ten years ago, and things may have
changed since
> then. I also admit that my students didn't want to
abandon their own
> cultures, they wanted to add "American" to the list
of things they
> already were.
>
> Optime vale et valete
>
> M. Lucretius Agricola
>
>
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39314 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: This is Latin, isnt it?
Thank You,Cato! I knew I wasnt losing it!
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
> OSD C. Equitius Cato
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> The expression "Deus le/lo vult!" was used by
Crusaders in the 11th
> and 12th centuries A.D. as a battle cry --- "God
wills it!" --- in the
> assault on the Holy Land to recover the areas sacred
to Christians,
> primarily Jerusalem and the Holy Sepulchre.
>
> Another catchy one was "HEP! HEP!", which stood for
"Hierosolyma est
> Perdita!" --- "Jerusalem is lost!" --- and was
generally used when
> slaughtering Jews and/or Moslems in the cities and
towns between
> France and Palestine. Even as late as the 19th
century A.D.,
> antisemitic rioters in Europe often shouted "Hep!
Hep!" while on the
> prowl for Jews. Mob harrassment of Jews in Hamburg,
Frankfurt, and
> other German cities in 1819, in fact, became known
as the "Hep! Hep!"
> Riots.
>
> see: http://www.jewishgates.com/file.asp?File_ID=80
>
> From this acronym many scholars believe we get the
current "hip hip
> hooray".
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39315 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: This is Latin, isnt it?
Gods, I love this place.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<cn.salvius.astur@...> wrote:
> CN·SALVIVS·ASTVR·S·P·D
>
> M. Flavius scripsit:
>
> > The term Deus Io Volt! Is Latin, isnt it? If not,
what
> > is it?
>
> Is it Latin? Depending on how lax you are in
defining what "Latin" is...
>
> Although I am by no means an expert in Mediaeval
Romance languages,
> after having read some "cansons de troubadour" in
their original
> language, to me it sounds like 12th or 13th century
Provençal -- a
> Romance language spoken in Southern France which was
culturally very
> important during the Middle Ages.
>
> Of course, it means: "God Wants It!"
>
> Probably, it is be quite similar to what the crowd
in Clermont-Ferrand
> (yes; that's the South of France) must have shouted
after pope Urban
> II requested knights to fight in Palestine in
1095...
>
> S·V·B·E·E·V
>
> CN·SALVIVS·T·F·A·NEP·OVF·ASTVR·SCRIPSIT


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39316 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salvete omnes,

I did not insult Christianity. Please don't get offended that easily over a discussion just because a statement that brings in Christianity is used. There were many reasons why the Roman Empire fell, in my opinion it was one of the underlying factors that contributed to it. I am not an anti-Semite or an anti-Christian. Christianity is what it is and it is true unto itself. It indeed became the force behind Western and European culture right up into the Twentieth Century. Although this culture was founded on the Roman Culture and certainly influenced by it, in my opinion it is a mistake to confuse the two into one. There was a very big difference between the two, they are not identical or even similar in nature. As big a difference as there was between the Chinese and Japanese Culture. Yes they both had Emperors and they both had Buddhism and similar writing systems but that's where the comparison ends. They are completely different cultures.

European Feudalism and Roman Republicanism couldn't be further apart. Byzantium was so different from the original Rome that it had to be classified as Byzantium. Not Rome. I don't care what they considered themselves to be. The Germans of Hitler's time also considered themselves to be the inheritors of the Romans that's why they used the name "Dritte Reich" or Third Empire: 1. Roman Empire 2. Holy Roman Empire 3. German Empire. What did the rest of the world think of that? We also consider ourselves to be Romans. Do you think the macro-world around us also agree with that statement? Of course not, they think of us as a collection of people interested in Rome to the point of obsession but certainly Not Romans.

If the USA becomes atheistic and completely socialized, we may still continue to call it The United States but it will have ceased to be the country that the founding fathers created. It would have nothing in common with it other than the name. This is precisely what happened to Rome except it was Christianity that changed it. The early Emperors, although they were insane in the way they went about it were not all that incorrect in their assessment of what would happen to the Roman culture and empire if Christianity were to become the dominant religion in the Empire.

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: gaiusequitiuscato
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 10:02 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome


OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes.

"As Roman culture succumbed to Christianity and lost its creative
force..."

What a remarkable statement, Cassius Philippus! You manage to
(unwittingly, I believe) insult Christianity --- Rome was forced to
"succumb" to it --- and ignore the next thousand years of Roman
history, the Byzantine Empire :-)

The glorious explosion of arts, science, literature, and music that
accompanied the rise of the Eastern Empire gives clear testimony to
the vitality and exuberance of that surviving Roman culture --- a
robust, militaristic *Christian* Roman culture. At no time, even
after the language of the court had changed to Greek, did the
Byzantines ever consider themselves anything but Romans --- and the
rest of the world acknowledged them as such, the pretentions of the
Carolingians notwithstanding.

Valete bene,

Cato





SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
Roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.1/169 - Release Date: 11/15/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39317 From: lucius_fidelius Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Salve Licini Crasse,

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Licinius Crassus
<glcrassus@b...> wrote:

> It is an interesting twist, though, with regard to the exortation
> of Christians to not continue pagan customs, especially since so
> many Christian 'holy days' were based on pagan celebrations and
> simply given a new name and raison d'etre. Unless he had been
> seriously 'born again' I imagine it would have been extremely hard
> for the common man to simply give up doing what he had been doing
> his entire life!

It is very interesting and I am particularly grateful that this
textual example was brought up in the forum, even if I thought it
somewhat outside the discussion. It's original audience was Christian
and the tone was hardly coercive which reinforced that at least this
example was directed to a largely Christianized world. What was most
interesting to me was how paganized these Christians were even while
Christians (which the author does not question)- they still
maintained a paganized culture that was mystical or superstitious.
Not recommended by Christian authorities, but not surprising to them
either.

The Christian recasting of holidays is a popular topic and I have
many doubts about prevailing ideas. These days may have been pagan in
origin though there comes a point when it's a secular rather than
pagan custom. In most cases, the custom had lost most of it's
original significance by the time it became Christianized. I go back
to Halloween because it's just been celebrated though still makes for
good example. The original pagan Roman feast was celebrated in May
and "Christianized" as All Saint's Day in the 7th century and moved
to November in the 9th. By then, Christianity having been the state
religion for several hundred years, meant that paganism was
long before ended as a religion despite some continuity in folk
beliefs. "All Saint's Day" was actually inaugurated with the transfer
of the Pantheon (the "home" of the Roman gods) to the Bishop of Rome
and it probably was a formality at that point even.

As a closer and briefer example, at what point was "Thursday" an
invocation to Thor rather than the commonly accepted term for a day
of the week. To think that early church authorities didn't know
what "Thorsday" referred to would just be ignorance- so obviously, it
didn't have any threatening connotations. What exactly did threaten?
Well, if one just assumes that it all was threatening, that one will
never discover the real answer when that answer might have taught
them something. Critical thinking is most important when discovering
the truth of history.

I wax long on this subject though I suppose the real (recurring)
point for me is that just because a view is circulated among some
communities because it seems to meet their purposes, that won't make
it true. If one distorts the known facts to fit some preconcieved
notions the real answers get obscured. One example (!) would be the
distortion of history to fit the notion that all persecution against
pagans were by Christians. No doubt many strains of paganism were
trampled if not extinguished by the Roman war machine- the ones that
survived did so because they had no political ambitions. So, by
painting a fictional culprit out of Christians because it might be
popular to do so, one has obscured the real truth of the power of
Rome. This is but one example out of many and I certainly won't
respond often though I hope that others with at least as much
interest in history will add their corrections, however
diplomatically or not.

Much invigorating discourse in the forum lately- thank you to
everyone involved!

VIVAT ROMA.

Vale, et valete,

L. Fidelius Graecus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39318 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Salve Graece.

If you wish to read how the Christians continued to persecute the
Druids, read "The Druids" by Peter Berresford Ellis (ISBN 0-8028-
3798-0 Eerdmans 1995). I don't think anyone has referenced this book
in this thread - if they have apologies.

If you examine the history of the Celtic Church in Ireland, and the
transformation of the wandering Druid of classical time into the lay
schools (whose tradition originated with Cathbad in Gaul), the
judicial positions that remained in certain families right through
into the 1600's, and the persecution of Pelagius by Augustine
(despite frequent acquittals on heresy charges eventually Augustine
circumvented Pope Zosimus (who on his accession immediately
overturned the verdict of Innocent I), by appealing to the Emperor
Honorius. The latter issued a political proscription, which Zosimus
had to reluctantly follow suit with a finding of heresy. The reason
for Augustine's fury was that Pelagius was suspected of attempting
to revive "The Natural Philosophy of the Druids".

Druidical traditions did remain very strong, but were so interwoven
with life in Ireland that they could sink below the surface and
survive the various attempts of the Christians to eradicate their
knowledge (the prohibition against committing Celtic lore to writing
had waned with the demise of the Druids in their traditional role
which we are familiar with from the writings of Caesar), by
destroying books and wands (inscribed with Druidic lore).

You are correct that there was no widespread murder by Christians
(one of the few pagan groups that survived the early church's zeal),
simply due to the shift in roles. Druids went from central and key
figures in the judicial, medical, and warrior roles to teachers
(ironic that the lay schools teachers that promoted pagan poetry
that was based on Druidic lore, and had been composed by Druids, had
to be sanctioned by the local abbot). The real triumph of the
Druidic culture in Ireland was that the teachings of Pelagius became
so ingrained in the Celtic Church that it thereafter was always
under suspicion of being not only heretical but steeped in Druidic
lore. It is fair to say that Christians did persecute those that
promoted druidic thought and who were the direct successors of the
wandering druid, and they persecuted them trough trials for heresy.

Of course the cause of Augustine's fury was that {Pelagius had
contradicted the doctrine of, amongst many things, ordained destiny.
Pelagius sponsored the belief that man was not tainted with original
sin and had free will. That and certain revolutionary ideas that the
few rich were at the root cause of the poverty of the many was
enough to set Augustine into a fury of retribution. Ultimately the
Roman church triumphed in Britain as a whole over the Celtic church,
so did Augustine win in the end? Given the revival of interest in
Druidic customs and the decline in the appeal of Christianity maybe
not.

Anyway Ellis goes into great detail about the transformation of the
Druids from their traditional role into one that remained ingrained
in Irish culture and even shaped the direction that the Celtic
Christian church took. He covers the attempts by the Christians to
snuff out this tradition. His work does support the contention that
the Druids were not eradicated by the Romans, that they survived and
eventually transformed from wanderers to philosophers.

As with all life there is rarely a black and white answer, and I
think Ellis makes a compelling argument for a transformation rather
than an eradication of the Druids, despite the best efforts of
Augustine and his "Taliban" like minions.

Vale
Gnaeus Iulius Caesar


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lucius_fidelius" <nexus909@h...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Corneli Malacitane, et Salvete Omnes,
>
> Even today in the mediterranean there are many the are fearful of
> the "evil eye" yet that doesn't make them pagans or that they are
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39319 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve,

*Ahem* God forbid! We cannot trust one person to come along and solve it. Ronald Reagan was one of a kind and did hold it together for a while. Caesar was also one of a kind and managed to hold it together for a while. Both men were despised by the elites of their nation. One was assassinated, the other was almost assassinated. Caesar eliminated the Gallic Menace, Reagan eliminated the Soviet Menace. The death of Caesar set in motion a whirlwind that ended in Autocratic rule by Octavian. The end of the Reagan administration has started a whirlwind as well. It is the closest to a civil war we could have in the USA without actually coming to blows. The last several elections prove my point as well as the attacks by the "elites" on the Bush Administration. The comparison could also be made between the Islamic Terrorist threat and the Jewish Revolt in the first century. The comparisons are weird.

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: Gaius Licinius Crassus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 3:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome


Salve,

Unfortunately, at times I believe the Balkanization of the US has
already begun! With our current governmental system it seems unlikely
that a real leader will be elected anytime soon; we seem to be *ahem*
lacking in that department lately.

The REAL question is...WWRD? What Would Rome Do?

Vale,

G Licinius Crassus

raymond fuentes wrote:

> When you live in a country that is a patchwork of
> people & ideals without a COMMON ground thats not a
> nation,its a way station until something better comes
> up
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> <glcrassus@...> wrote:
> > Salve omnes,
> >
> > True, this seems to be happening- but (NOTE: PLAYING
> THE DEVIL'S
> > ADVOCATE) what is the criteria for judging one
> civilization against
> > another? Surely everyone recognizes ancient Rome as
> the greatest single
> > civilization in history- but there are also the
> Chinese civilization,
> > the rise of Islamic nations, the earlier Hellenic
> civilization, etc.
> > Just as we can't judge ancient Rome by modern-day
> standards, we can't
> > presuppose Western civilization to be any better
> than any other present
> > civilization- it's simply comparing apples to
> oranges. In my opinion,
> > civilizations aren't inherently any 'better' than
> others- just different.
> >
> > One may say, of course, "Muslim nations demean their
> women" or "The
> > Chinese murder their own children"...I don't agree
> with either practice
> > at all, BUT taken in the context of that particular
> society's situation
> > and needs those may be perfectly acceptable
> behaviors. It doesn't matter
> > if WE like it or not- it's their ball of wax, not
> ours. Who is to say
> > that the Masai of Africa are inferior because they
> don't have big cities
> > or scientific geniuses among them? They have a
> perfectly workable system
> > that has served them quite well for centuries-
> without resorting to wars
> > of conquest or economic blackmail- at a time when
> many of our own
> > Western nations are tearing themselves apart from
> within.
> >
> > That being said, however, I am proud to be of
> Germanic descent- the West
> > has it's problems, but every civilization goes
> through change over time.
> > It's just time for that big old Wheel of Fate to
> keep turning so we see
> > what happens next!
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > G Licinius Crassus
> >
> >
> >
> > raymond fuentes wrote:
> >
> > > The American school system does not help.Kids are
> > > taught that Western civilization is inferior to
> > > wherever it is the kids come from.They thumb noses
> > > more so.
> > > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > <senseiphil@...> wrote:
> > > > Salve Marinus,
> > > >
> > > > Tell that to the Japanese (even et the present
> > > time), Saudi, and Chinese (and Germans of the
> 1930's).
> > > They will vehemently disagree. But not to your
> face!
> > > They are superior and it's because of who and what
> > > they are they are as a society, race and culture
> or at
> > > least that is how THEY see it!
> > > >
> > > > Vires et honos,
> > > > Marcus Cassius Philippus
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 9:28 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tenney Frank and the
> Fall
> > > of Rome
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve Annia Minucia, et salvete quirites,
> > > >
> > > > annia@... wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm curious. Do you deny that before we had
> such
> > > "melting pot" societies
> > > > > that race was usually a characteristic of
> > > difference cultures?
> > > >
> > > > I think it's reasonable to say that many
> different
> > > cultures were
> > > > composed predominantly of people who shared a
> > > common ethnicity.
> > > > However, I think it's a mistake to conflate
> the
> > > characteristics of a
> > > > particular culture with the genetic heritage
> of
> > > the people in that
> > > > culture. A given cultural group perpetuates
> > > itself via genes which
> === Message Truncated ===
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
> http://farechase.yahoo.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.1/169 - Release Date: 11/15/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39320 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Folks,stop Being so sensitive about religion. Lets
have a true open forum where cives can speak thier
minds & not cry off topic if dont agree w/ a post.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<senseiphil@...> wrote:
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I did not insult Christianity. Please don't get
offended that easily over a discussion just because a
statement that brings in Christianity is used. There
were many reasons why the Roman Empire fell, in my
opinion it was one of the underlying factors that
contributed to it. I am not an anti-Semite or an
anti-Christian. Christianity is what it is and it is
true unto itself. It indeed became the force behind
Western and European culture right up into the
Twentieth Century. Although this culture was founded
on the Roman Culture and certainly influenced by it,
in my opinion it is a mistake to confuse the two into
one. There was a very big difference between the two,
they are not identical or even similar in nature. As
big a difference as there was between the Chinese and
Japanese Culture. Yes they both had Emperors and they
both had Buddhism and similar writing systems but
that's where the comparison ends. They are completely
different cultures.
>
> European Feudalism and Roman Republicanism couldn't
be further apart. Byzantium was so different from the
original Rome that it had to be classified as
Byzantium. Not Rome. I don't care what they considered
themselves to be. The Germans of Hitler's time also
considered themselves to be the inheritors of the
Romans that's why they used the name "Dritte Reich" or
Third Empire: 1. Roman Empire 2. Holy Roman Empire 3.
German Empire. What did the rest of the world think of
that? We also consider ourselves to be Romans. Do you
think the macro-world around us also agree with that
statement? Of course not, they think of us as a
collection of people interested in Rome to the point
of obsession but certainly Not Romans.
>
> If the USA becomes atheistic and completely
socialized, we may still continue to call it The
United States but it will have ceased to be the
country that the founding fathers created. It would
have nothing in common with it other than the name.
This is precisely what happened to Rome except it was
Christianity that changed it. The early Emperors,
although they were insane in the way they went about
it were not all that incorrect in their assessment of
what would happen to the Roman culture and empire if
Christianity were to become the dominant religion in
the Empire.
>
> Vires et honos,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: gaiusequitiuscato
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 10:02 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall
of Rome
>
>
> OSD C. Equitius Cato
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> "As Roman culture succumbed to Christianity and
lost its creative
> force..."
>
> What a remarkable statement, Cassius Philippus!
You manage to
> (unwittingly, I believe) insult Christianity ---
Rome was forced to
> "succumb" to it --- and ignore the next thousand
years of Roman
> history, the Byzantine Empire :-)
>
> The glorious explosion of arts, science,
literature, and music that
> accompanied the rise of the Eastern Empire gives
clear testimony to
> the vitality and exuberance of that surviving
Roman culture --- a
> robust, militaristic *Christian* Roman culture.
At no time, even
> after the language of the court had changed to
Greek, did the
> Byzantines ever consider themselves anything but
Romans --- and the
> rest of the world acknowledged them as such, the
pretentions of the
> Carolingians notwithstanding.
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman
empire The fall of the roman empire
> Roman empire
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an
email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39321 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve, Gaius Licinius Crassus; salvete, omnes.

On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 02:33:41AM -0600, Gaius Licinius Crassus wrote:
> Salve,
>
> Unfortunately, at times I believe the Balkanization of the US has
> already begun! With our current governmental system it seems unlikely
> that a real leader will be elected anytime soon; we seem to be *ahem*
> lacking in that department lately.
>
> The REAL question is...WWRD? What Would Rome Do?

The answer is, of course, "invade". I mean, there are all these useful
resources going to waste, and no one minding them... :)

I think it's a bit too early to bewail The Death Of The US (film at
http://11.0.0.0) - particularly with the thoughtless implication of "our
pure culture has been diluted by all these furriners" - not that I'm
saying that you're doing this. As both history and basic genetics show
us, these 'pure' strains are always sickly and weak; whether it's the
admixture of new blood or of new ideas, it's _diversity_ that always
leads to greater survival capability.

As to the problems of the US, they are rooted in many causes - of which
blind adherence to dogma such as that idea of 'purity' is far from the
least damaging.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Amicus certus in re incerta cernitur.
A friend in need is a friend indeed.
-- Ennius, quoted by Cicero.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39322 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
Salve, M. Lucretius Agricola; salvete, omnes.

On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 09:52:16AM -0000, M. Lucretius Agricola wrote:
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
> <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> >
>
> [snip]
>
> > No one wants to assimilate anymore.
>
> [snip]
>
>
> Salve amice,
>
> I beg to differ. Adult English classes in Southern California are
> always full and nearly always have long waiting lists. I did part of
> my ESL training at a school that had a strict attendance policy. A
> student who missed class twice was expelled from the session and a new
> student was ALWAYS waiting to fill the empty seat.
>
> Our students came from all over the world. A great many went on to
> study for and pass the citizenship exam.
>
> I admit, this was ten years ago, and things may have changed since
> then. I also admit that my students didn't want to abandon their own
> cultures, they wanted to add "American" to the list of things they
> already were.

Well said, sir. My own ESL classes were almost thirty years ago (also in
Southern California), and I recall much the same policies being in
effect then - and recall the same packed classrooms.

I've lived in New York, on and off, for about five years, and moved in
all levels of society during that time - from cab driver to top-level
computer analyst, as well as some fairly high-level political events. I
have _never,_ in my time there, seen the kind of anti-American attitudes
repeatedly described by one (and only one) of the posters here. On the
other hand, I have heard plenty of third-hand reports of them (i.e., a
story of Arabs dancing in the streets on 9/11) - which, on
investigation, turned out to be materially false. I leave others to
judge the reasons for which these kinds of rumors are invented and
propagated.

Personally, I would have thought that anyone even _slightly_ familiar
with rules of evidence would avoid repeating this kind of thing, but
then, I expect people to be reasonable as a default behavior. Silly of
me, perhaps.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Fortes fortuna adiuvat.
Fortune favours the brave.
-- Terence, "Phormio"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39323 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes.

Cassius Phillipus, I now you didn't intend it to come out as an insult
(which is why I modified my statement with "unwittingly"), and I do
not think you are necessarily anti-Christian. It is a natural
by-product of the restoration of a social entity (the res publica) one
of whose most fundamental elements (the religio romana) was crushed by
Christianity that there is a current of distaste for the practices of
the Church over the past coupla thousand years :-)

You wrote:

"Although this culture was founded on the Roman Culture and certainly
influenced by it, in my opinion it is a mistake to confuse the two
into one. There was a very big difference between the two, they are
not identical or even similar in nature. As big a difference as there
was between the Chinese and Japanese Culture. Yes they both had
Emperors and they both had Buddhism and similar writing systems but
that's where the comparison ends. They are completely different cultures."


It is unfortunately neither your right nor privilege to decide for the
Eastern Romans what or who they were; you cannot judge an historical
entity by the standards of contemporary scholarship or personal
preference. The Eastern Romans, and the rest of the contemporaneous
world, saw that entity as the Roman Empire, and so, in fact, it was.
The people of the Eastern Empire never knew or even imagined a phrase
like "Byzantine"; they knew they were Romans, absolutely nothing less.
Constantine I, in transferring the imperial capital to
Constantinople, transferred the identity of the Empire with it. The
Emperor in Constantinople held the title "Basileus Romaioi" ---
"Emperor of the Romans" --- until A.D. 1453.

For quite a long time, the identity of the Roman Empire had had less
and less to do with the crumbling, ineffective City on the Tiber.
Ravenna had long usurped the Eternal City's place as the focus of
Western military, political, and cultural identity.

The term "Byzantine" was coined by 18th century French and English
philosophers of the "Enlightenment" because they were convinced that
only corruption, decadence, and decay were products of the Eastern
Empire and so refused to use the terms "Greek" or "Roman"; they felt
that these terms belonged only to the ancient cultures in which they
found the beginnings of Western thought. They didn't pay much
attention to the corruption, decadence, and decay during the Western
Roman Empire between Augustus and Romulus Augustus because it did not
suit their intellectual and emotional needs. It was a form of
historical and ethical arrogance that has been overwhelmingly
dismissed by scholars, although the term itself became so predominant
that it survives.

In passing, remember that the political state that existed in Germany
from A.D. 1933-1945 is, in fact, referred to as "the Third Reich"; the
first was the Holy Roman Empire (called the "Holy Roman Empire of the
German Nation" after about A.D. 1450), and the Second was that under
Bismarck and Kaiser Wilhelm I (A.D. 1871-1918). It had nothing to do
with Roman Empire itself.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39324 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Listen,Bush is no walk in the park but do we really
want the NERONIAN Clintons back in the White House?
Slick WILLIE may have Europe duped but NO WAY,not
again!
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<senseiphil@...> wrote:
> Salve,
>
> *Ahem* God forbid! We cannot trust one person to
come along and solve it. Ronald Reagan was one of a
kind and did hold it together for a while. Caesar was
also one of a kind and managed to hold it together for
a while. Both men were despised by the elites of their
nation. One was assassinated, the other was almost
assassinated. Caesar eliminated the Gallic Menace,
Reagan eliminated the Soviet Menace. The death of
Caesar set in motion a whirlwind that ended in
Autocratic rule by Octavian. The end of the Reagan
administration has started a whirlwind as well. It is
the closest to a civil war we could have in the USA
without actually coming to blows. The last several
elections prove my point as well as the attacks by the
"elites" on the Bush Administration. The comparison
could also be made between the Islamic Terrorist
threat and the Jewish Revolt in the first century. The
comparisons are weird.
>
> Vires et honos,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gaius Licinius Crassus
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 3:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tenney Frank and the Fall
of Rome
>
>
> Salve,
>
> Unfortunately, at times I believe the
Balkanization of the US has
> already begun! With our current governmental
system it seems unlikely
> that a real leader will be elected anytime soon;
we seem to be *ahem*
> lacking in that department lately.
>
> The REAL question is...WWRD? What Would Rome Do?
>
> Vale,
>
> G Licinius Crassus
>
> raymond fuentes wrote:
>
> > When you live in a country that is a patchwork
of
> > people & ideals without a COMMON ground thats
not a
> > nation,its a way station until something better
comes
> > up
> > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > <glcrassus@...> wrote:
> > > Salve omnes,
> > >
> > > True, this seems to be happening- but (NOTE:
PLAYING
> > THE DEVIL'S
> > > ADVOCATE) what is the criteria for judging one
> > civilization against
> > > another? Surely everyone recognizes ancient
Rome as
> > the greatest single
> > > civilization in history- but there are also
the
> > Chinese civilization,
> > > the rise of Islamic nations, the earlier
Hellenic
> > civilization, etc.
> > > Just as we can't judge ancient Rome by
modern-day
> > standards, we can't
> > > presuppose Western civilization to be any
better
> > than any other present
> > > civilization- it's simply comparing apples to
> > oranges. In my opinion,
> > > civilizations aren't inherently any 'better'
than
> > others- just different.
> > >
> > > One may say, of course, "Muslim nations demean
their
> > women" or "The
> > > Chinese murder their own children"...I don't
agree
> > with either practice
> > > at all, BUT taken in the context of that
particular
> > society's situation
> > > and needs those may be perfectly acceptable
> > behaviors. It doesn't matter
> > > if WE like it or not- it's their ball of wax,
not
> > ours. Who is to say
> > > that the Masai of Africa are inferior because
they
> > don't have big cities
> > > or scientific geniuses among them? They have a
> > perfectly workable system
> > > that has served them quite well for centuries-
> > without resorting to wars
> > > of conquest or economic blackmail- at a time
when
> > many of our own
> > > Western nations are tearing themselves apart
from
> > within.
> > >
> > > That being said, however, I am proud to be of
> > Germanic descent- the West
> > > has it's problems, but every civilization goes
> > through change over time.
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39325 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve Agricola,

Please don't open that can of worms because I don't have the time to transcribe the thousands of clips about what Mr. Fuentes is talking about but here is a Gem from Harvard's - now Princeton's "Bright" Prof. Cornel West (see if you can make any sense of it!):

"I believe that the major life-denying forces in our world are economic exploitation (resulting primarily from the social logic of capital accumulation), state repression (linked to the social logic of state augmentation), bureaucratic domination (owing to the social logic of administrative subordination), racial, sexual and heterosexual subjugation (due to the social logics of white, male and heterosexual supremacist practices) and ecological subjection (resulting, in part, from modern values of scientific manipulation), I entertain a variety of social analyses and cultural critiques that yield not merely one grand synthetic social theory."

Don't even get me started with my buddy MIT's Noam Chomsky's diatribes.

In California's school system it is against the law to quote Biblical passages even when they have historical context to the lesson. However, Islamic Culture Studies are required for one semester in Junior High School:

http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/1148

The California Department of Education, which requires all seventh-grade world history courses to include a unit on Islam, approved the text and module. In 1998, the state overhauled its standards for its Islam unit to include more teaching about the Muslim prophet Muhammad and the Quran. Mansuri made numerous trips to Sacramento to lobby for the changes, and the department invited CIE to review its draft.

Many California parents say the state essentially is allowing Muslim activists to brainwash their kids into accepting Islam, while at the same time marginalizing Christianity.

In contrast to the seventh-grade Muslim unit, where children are first introduced to Islam, the earlier one on Christianity does not involve any role play. Students are not asked to recite Christian prayers or memorize Scripture.

I could continue quoting all day long, so please don't go there. It is more than an opinion, it is a fact - but you'll never find it in the pages of the New York Times or any other national media outlet in the USA, broadcast or print. Yes, in MY opinion, the loss of the original religion of Rome was instrumental in the decay and destruction of that civilization and nation just as the undermining of Christianity will be for ours.

Vires et honos,

Marcus Cassius Philippus

----- Original Message -----
From: M. Lucretius Agricola
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 4:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome


Salvete Omnes,

I come before you to ring a bell I have rung before, and sadly that I
expect I will ring again.


To all posters here, please qualify your statements.

If you are expressing an opinion, please clearly state that. If you
are talking about a particular place or situation, or if you have
specific examples in mind, please say so.

As an example, and not to point fingers, really, I would say that
"Kids are taught that Western civilization is inferior to wherever it
is the kids come from." is almost certainly untrue. As a generic
statement it needs only a single counterexample to be untrue, and I'm
sure that at least one example of a teacher who does not teach that
Western civilization is inferior does exits.


So please, if these sorts of discussions are to have any value, lets
avoid expressing opinions as facts, and lets back up statements with
examples.


It is not my plan to squelch any discussions, but a little precision
will really help things along.




Ago vobis gratias multas

M. Lucretius Agricola



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
>
> The American school system does not help.Kids are
> taught that Western civilization is inferior to
> wherever it is the kids come from.They thumb noses
> more so.
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> <senseiphil@n...> wrote:
> > Salve Marinus,
> >
> > Tell that to the Japanese (even et the present
> time), Saudi, and Chinese (and Germans of the 1930's).
> They will vehemently disagree. But not to your face!
> They are superior and it's because of who and what
> they are they are as a society, race and culture or at
> least that is how THEY see it!
> >
> > Vires et honos,
> > Marcus Cassius Philippus
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 9:28 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tenney Frank and the Fall
> of Rome
> >
> >
> > Salve Annia Minucia, et salvete quirites,
> >
> > annia@c... wrote:
> >
> > > I'm curious. Do you deny that before we had such
> "melting pot" societies
> > > that race was usually a characteristic of
> difference cultures?
> >
> > I think it's reasonable to say that many different
> cultures were
> > composed predominantly of people who shared a
> common ethnicity.
> > However, I think it's a mistake to conflate the
> characteristics of a
> > particular culture with the genetic heritage of
> the people in that
> > culture. A given cultural group perpetuates
> itself via genes which
> > carry the genetic coding, and memes which carry
> the ideas down through
> > the generations.
> >
> > > And wouldn't
> > > these different culture also have different
> values?
> >
> > Possibly, but not necessarily. But we can
> postulate this sort of
> > variation for the sake of discussion.
> >
> > > Ina sense, referring to
> > > race as the cause could be correct if we assume
> race=culture in this
> > > context.
> >
> > But that's just it. Race is NOT culture. Not at
> all. To mistake the
> > one for the other is to fall into one of the most
> egregious errors of
> > the past. Strictly speaking, we are all of the
> human race. It is a
> > flawed interpretation of biology that produced the
> notion of different
> > skin colors representing different races, and
> unfortunately that flawed
> > idea has permeated the collective consciousness to
> the point where it
> > has become generally accepted.
> >
> > Even by assuming that ethnicity is equal to
> culture we stray into
> > dangerous territory. Genetic heritage is not the
> same as memetic
> > heritage.
> >
> > Vale, et valete quirites,
> >
> > -- Marinus
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman
> empire The fall of the roman empire
> > Roman empire
> >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
> >
> > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an
> email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> === Message Truncated ===
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>






SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
Roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.1/169 - Release Date: 11/15/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39326 From: David Kling Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Marco Cassio Philippo salutem dicit
I'm not convinced that it was Christianity per se that motivated the
founding fathers in creating what is now called the United States. I believe
it was the spirit that is prevalent within Masonry. A theistic current, but
one built upon toleration, understanding, and cooperation. I daresay the
Christianity of Pat Robertson is doing nothing for the welfare of this
country, as does the "religious right." The United States was founded upon a
spirit of toleration. Much of what the religious right attempts to
accomplish has nothing to do with toleration, or the principles that Masonry
espouses. I know a couple of Masons in Nova Roma who would probably agree
with me.
Nova Roma is a great example of how the "principles" of toleration of
Masonry *can* function in our society. We have an organization that was
originally founded to promote the Religio Romana. It has become much more
than just a vehicle for the Religio, but still maintains that purpose. Nova
Roma is also accepting of people of all religious backgrounds, and not
simply one. We have different denominations of Christianity represented, and
many expressions of Pagan/Polytheistic traditions, as well as Jewish and
Buddhist practitioners. This is an excellent representation of how things
should be in the macronational world.
In conclusion, I do not believe the founding fathers of the United States
intended to create a Christian nation. An atheistic nation? No. But not
necessarily a Christian nation either. One does not have to follow the
dogmatic constraints of mainstream Christianity to be a person of faith, and
I believe the founding fathers of the United States recognized this.
Vale;
C. Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 11/15/05, Sensei Phil Perez <senseiphil@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I did not insult Christianity. Please don't get offended that easily over
> a discussion just because a statement that brings in Christianity is used.
> There were many reasons why the Roman Empire fell, in my opinion it was one
> of the underlying factors that contributed to it. I am not an anti-Semite or
> an anti-Christian. Christianity is what it is and it is true unto itself. It
> indeed became the force behind Western and European culture right up into
> the Twentieth Century. Although this culture was founded on the Roman
> Culture and certainly influenced by it, in my opinion it is a mistake to
> confuse the two into one. There was a very big difference between the two,
> they are not identical or even similar in nature. As big a difference as
> there was between the Chinese and Japanese Culture. Yes they both had
> Emperors and they both had Buddhism and similar writing systems but that's
> where the comparison ends. They are completely different cultures.
>
> European Feudalism and Roman Republicanism couldn't be further apart.
> Byzantium was so different from the original Rome that it had to be
> classified as Byzantium. Not Rome. I don't care what they considered
> themselves to be. The Germans of Hitler's time also considered themselves to
> be the inheritors of the Romans that's why they used the name "Dritte Reich"
> or Third Empire: 1. Roman Empire 2. Holy Roman Empire 3. German Empire. What
> did the rest of the world think of that? We also consider ourselves to be
> Romans. Do you think the macro-world around us also agree with that
> statement? Of course not, they think of us as a collection of people
> interested in Rome to the point of obsession but certainly Not Romans.
>
> If the USA becomes atheistic and completely socialized, we may still
> continue to call it The United States but it will have ceased to be the
> country that the founding fathers created. It would have nothing in common
> with it other than the name. This is precisely what happened to Rome except
> it was Christianity that changed it. The early Emperors, although they were
> insane in the way they went about it were not all that incorrect in their
> assessment of what would happen to the Roman culture and empire if
> Christianity were to become the dominant religion in the Empire.
>
> Vires et honos,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39327 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
Salvete omnes,

They certainly have changed. In my school district there are interpreters working for $60,000 a year with only one client because the parents of the children requested them instead of having them take English classes. The ACLU was right there to back them up and the school system backed down in order to save ourselves the millions of dollars it would take for the legal battle. We pay for it out of our already tightly squeezed taxes. Even the voting ballots are bilingual in some of our communities.

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus


----- Original Message -----
From: M. Lucretius Agricola
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 4:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
>

[snip]

> No one wants to assimilate anymore.

[snip]


Salve amice,

I beg to differ. Adult English classes in Southern California are
always full and nearly always have long waiting lists. I did part of
my ESL training at a school that had a strict attendance policy. A
student who missed class twice was expelled from the session and a new
student was ALWAYS waiting to fill the empty seat.

Our students came from all over the world. A great many went on to
study for and pass the citizenship exam.

I admit, this was ten years ago, and things may have changed since
then. I also admit that my students didn't want to abandon their own
cultures, they wanted to add "American" to the list of things they
already were.

Optime vale et valete

M. Lucretius Agricola






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.1/169 - Release Date: 11/15/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39328 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
The one poster who reports this stuff lives in Queens
where there is plenty of anti-Americanism, Im a cop, I
see & hear it everyday.The Dancing On 911 HAPPENED
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <ben@...>
wrote:
> Salve, M. Lucretius Agricola; salvete, omnes.
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 09:52:16AM -0000, M.
Lucretius Agricola wrote:
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
> > <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > No one wants to assimilate anymore.
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >
> > Salve amice,
> >
> > I beg to differ. Adult English classes in Southern
California are
> > always full and nearly always have long waiting
lists. I did part of
> > my ESL training at a school that had a strict
attendance policy. A
> > student who missed class twice was expelled from
the session and a new
> > student was ALWAYS waiting to fill the empty seat.

> >
> > Our students came from all over the world. A great
many went on to
> > study for and pass the citizenship exam.
> >
> > I admit, this was ten years ago, and things may
have changed since
> > then. I also admit that my students didn't want to
abandon their own
> > cultures, they wanted to add "American" to the
list of things they
> > already were.
>
> Well said, sir. My own ESL classes were almost
thirty years ago (also in
> Southern California), and I recall much the same
policies being in
> effect then - and recall the same packed classrooms.
>
> I've lived in New York, on and off, for about five
years, and moved in
> all levels of society during that time - from cab
driver to top-level
> computer analyst, as well as some fairly high-level
political events. I
> have _never,_ in my time there, seen the kind of
anti-American attitudes
> repeatedly described by one (and only one) of the
posters here. On the
> other hand, I have heard plenty of third-hand
reports of them (i.e., a
> story of Arabs dancing in the streets on 9/11) -
which, on
> investigation, turned out to be materially false. I
leave others to
> judge the reasons for which these kinds of rumors
are invented and
> propagated.
>
> Personally, I would have thought that anyone even
_slightly_ familiar
> with rules of evidence would avoid repeating this
kind of thing, but
> then, I expect people to be reasonable as a default
behavior. Silly of
> me, perhaps.
>
>
> Valete,
> Caius Minucius Scaevola
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Fortes fortuna adiuvat.
> Fortune favours the brave.
> -- Terence, "Phormio"


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39329 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve Phillipe

Oh my friend, I don't ask you to transcribe all, or even many. I just
ask that not you particularly, but all in general, mark statements of
opinion as such. If something is presented as fact, let us all please
try as much as possible to give some sort of source.

In the long run I think this would help promote openness and civil
discourse, because there will be less cause for the kind of
misunderstanding that can lead to flames.

When I read such things as the "I believe that the major life-denying
forces in our world are economic exploitation..." quote below I do not
see it is an attack on Western values in particular, but rather as an
observation on the mechanisms of power in the world. The same
mechanisms would be just as damaging in the hands of any group. But
then, when we read we bring much of ourselves into the text, at least
as much as we bring the text into ourselves. As for all the rest, I'll
leave comment to others.


Optime vale, et valete Omnes

M. Lucretius Agricola



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Sensei Phil Perez"
<senseiphil@n...> wrote:
>
> Salve Agricola,
>
> Please don't open that can of worms because I don't have the time to
transcribe the thousands of clips about what Mr. Fuentes is talking
about but here is a Gem from Harvard's - now Princeton's "Bright"
Prof. Cornel West (see if you can make any sense of it!):
>
> "I believe that the major life-denying forces in our world are
economic exploitation (resulting primarily from the social logic of
capital accumulation), state repression (linked to the social logic of
state augmentation), bureaucratic domination (owing to the social
logic of administrative subordination), racial, sexual and
heterosexual subjugation (due to the social logics of white, male and
heterosexual supremacist practices) and ecological subjection
(resulting, in part, from modern values of scientific manipulation), I
entertain a variety of social analyses and cultural critiques that
yield not merely one grand synthetic social theory."
>
> Don't even get me started with my buddy MIT's Noam Chomsky's diatribes.
>
> In California's school system it is against the law to quote
Biblical passages even when they have historical context to the
lesson. However, Islamic Culture Studies are required for one semester
in Junior High School:
>
> http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/1148
>
> The California Department of Education, which requires all
seventh-grade world history courses to include a unit on Islam,
approved the text and module. In 1998, the state overhauled its
standards for its Islam unit to include more teaching about the Muslim
prophet Muhammad and the Quran. Mansuri made numerous trips to
Sacramento to lobby for the changes, and the department invited CIE to
review its draft.
>
> Many California parents say the state essentially is allowing Muslim
activists to brainwash their kids into accepting Islam, while at the
same time marginalizing Christianity.
>
> In contrast to the seventh-grade Muslim unit, where children are
first introduced to Islam, the earlier one on Christianity does not
involve any role play. Students are not asked to recite Christian
prayers or memorize Scripture.
>
> I could continue quoting all day long, so please don't go there. It
is more than an opinion, it is a fact - but you'll never find it in
the pages of the New York Times or any other national media outlet in
the USA, broadcast or print. Yes, in MY opinion, the loss of the
original religion of Rome was instrumental in the decay and
destruction of that civilization and nation just as the undermining of
Christianity will be for ours.
>
> Vires et honos,
>
> Marcus Cassius Philippus
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: M. Lucretius Agricola
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 4:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
>
>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> I come before you to ring a bell I have rung before, and sadly that I
> expect I will ring again.
>
>
> To all posters here, please qualify your statements.
>
> If you are expressing an opinion, please clearly state that. If you
> are talking about a particular place or situation, or if you have
> specific examples in mind, please say so.
>
> As an example, and not to point fingers, really, I would say that
> "Kids are taught that Western civilization is inferior to wherever it
> is the kids come from." is almost certainly untrue. As a generic
> statement it needs only a single counterexample to be untrue, and I'm
> sure that at least one example of a teacher who does not teach that
> Western civilization is inferior does exits.
>
>
> So please, if these sorts of discussions are to have any value, lets
> avoid expressing opinions as facts, and lets back up statements with
> examples.
>
>
> It is not my plan to squelch any discussions, but a little precision
> will really help things along.
>
>
>
>
> Ago vobis gratias multas
>
> M. Lucretius Agricola
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
> <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> >
> > The American school system does not help.Kids are
> > taught that Western civilization is inferior to
> > wherever it is the kids come from.They thumb noses
> > more so.
> > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > <senseiphil@n...> wrote:
> > > Salve Marinus,
> > >
> > > Tell that to the Japanese (even et the present
> > time), Saudi, and Chinese (and Germans of the 1930's).
> > They will vehemently disagree. But not to your face!
> > They are superior and it's because of who and what
> > they are they are as a society, race and culture or at
> > least that is how THEY see it!
> > >
> > > Vires et honos,
> > > Marcus Cassius Philippus
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 9:28 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tenney Frank and the Fall
> > of Rome
> > >
> > >
> > > Salve Annia Minucia, et salvete quirites,
> > >
> > > annia@c... wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm curious. Do you deny that before we had such
> > "melting pot" societies
> > > > that race was usually a characteristic of
> > difference cultures?
> > >
> > > I think it's reasonable to say that many different
> > cultures were
> > > composed predominantly of people who shared a
> > common ethnicity.
> > > However, I think it's a mistake to conflate the
> > characteristics of a
> > > particular culture with the genetic heritage of
> > the people in that
> > > culture. A given cultural group perpetuates
> > itself via genes which
> > > carry the genetic coding, and memes which carry
> > the ideas down through
> > > the generations.
> > >
> > > > And wouldn't
> > > > these different culture also have different
> > values?
> > >
> > > Possibly, but not necessarily. But we can
> > postulate this sort of
> > > variation for the sake of discussion.
> > >
> > > > Ina sense, referring to
> > > > race as the cause could be correct if we assume
> > race=culture in this
> > > > context.
> > >
> > > But that's just it. Race is NOT culture. Not at
> > all. To mistake the
> > > one for the other is to fall into one of the most
> > egregious errors of
> > > the past. Strictly speaking, we are all of the
> > human race. It is a
> > > flawed interpretation of biology that produced the
> > notion of different
> > > skin colors representing different races, and
> > unfortunately that flawed
> > > idea has permeated the collective consciousness to
> > the point where it
> > > has become generally accepted.
> > >
> > > Even by assuming that ethnicity is equal to
> > culture we stray into
> > > dangerous territory. Genetic heritage is not the
> > same as memetic
> > > heritage.
> > >
> > > Vale, et valete quirites,
> > >
> > > -- Marinus
> > >
> > >
> > > SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman
> > empire The fall of the roman empire
> > > Roman empire
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > >
> > > a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
> > >
> > > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an
> > email to:
> > > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> > Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > === Message Truncated ===
> >
> >
> > S P Q R
> >
> > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> >
> > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > Roman Citizen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
> > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The
fall of the roman empire
> Roman empire
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.1/169 - Release Date:
11/15/2005
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39330 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Not alone.But Im willing to speak as others are afraid.
To the person who identifies me as the one poster.Ive
had more than a handful of cives contact off list that
agree.The silent majority is exactly that.SILENT

S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39331 From: lucius_fidelius Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Salve Corneli Malacitane, et Salvete Omnes,


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Santo Orcero <irbis@o...>
wrote:

>> there was vestiges of folk beliefs though that hardly
>> constitutes the Druidism that was known in pre-Christian times.

> Well, they call themselves druids. As I said on my message, the
> religions evolved and the last druids in roman empire were pacific
> priest and judges on non-death penalty causes. It is of common
> sense that the warlords of Gallii wars did not exists on 6th
> century, but I am not talking about it, but the presence of a
> particular religion and its priests.

Even outside this discourse, I'd be interested in some evidence of
that. I've never heard of Druids in the seventh century and at least
as I'm concerned some Druidic traditions or customs do not a make a
Druid, particularly if they worship Jesus Christ.

>> What you quote from Eligius is common exhortation to Christians,
>> warning them against continuing pagan customs

> Sorry, but St. Eligius and St. Ouen were famous for his preaches
> against druidical movement. This is part of one of his preaches.
> But you know how those things works, only renember the history of
> the bishop Cirilus and Hypatia.

(Hypatia? Don't get me started...) That's where we disagree. What you
call a Druidical movement, I call cultural vestiges and folk beliefs.
I think the examples you quote support my view more as you provide a
sermon to Christians who kept up some pagan practices (like augury)
rather than to Druids or even pagans.

>> some very liberal stretches of reason because the Druids were
>> effectively extinguished by the Romans by 61AD as the title of the
>> BBC article suggests.

> What sugests for me (ok, english is not my mother tonge, but it is
> only an opinion) is that in 61AD they were defeated, and the age
> where they were the leaded political power in britain passed. By I
> can not find anything like "druidism dissapeared as a religion"
> or "all druids of thhe empire were killed". And the druidism was
> not stronger on Britain, but in Flanders.

The prevailing opinion- and I admit that it doesn't make it
absolutely true- is that Druidism as a religion was made extinct in
the first century. If you have some evidence otherwise, I would be
glad to hear it. I also admit that my belief in the extinction of
Druidism owes more to my pro-Caesar sympathies than anything else.

>> Twisting history to conform to this prevalent and flawed ideology
>> of "Christiani ad leones" doesn't insult Christians, it insults
>> the work of historians.

>... I renember for the school that the druids were mighty between
> the celts, and were warlords. After the defeat, they became priest
> and peace judges. They faded during centuries, and in some part of
> the empire stayed (mostly Flanders and other part of Lower
> Countries) still the Christianism were compulsory.

I don't doubt that many facets of pagan life existed into the Dark
Ages, though I believe that by the Medieval era, paganism as a
religious force was long gone throughout europe. And I'm no historian
either though I've read enough to confirm this. And I welcome any new
information.

> By the way, In which part of my message there were lions? On the
> same paragraph of King Arthur?

Well, maybe I took too much liberty in making a joke since english is
not your first language. "Christians to the lions" was a phrase in
classical Rome- where any social evil was ascribed to the Christians
as if doing away with them brought some solution. Here it seems that
you say that if not for Christianity, Druidism would have survived-
and I strongly disagree. Because of Julius Caesar, I doubt Christians
would have even met a Druid. And to the King Arthur reference, I
compare your transposition of Druids from the Dark Ages (or earlier)
to the Middle Ages with the fictional view of King Arthur being a
Medieval King rather than a Dark Ages warlord.

>> Is there not enough persecutions by Christians in
>> the middle ages that you can quote from? Oh wait- it was heterodox
>> Christians, Jews and Muslims that were persecuted and that doesn't
>> suit your purposes. Invented history won't suit them either.

> No hidden agenda. This began because somebody said that budism and
> hinduism have apported nothing to the humanity, I responded that
> they apported not to make "convert or die wars", then put an
> example the belicity of a budist country against another budist
> country. Then I put as a clear irony -or I thought so- of a war
> that I though that was clearly not religious, no matter that the
> religion of the fighters were different: Roma agains gallii;
> because people here are expected to know the deep roots of the
> anger of Romans against Gallii. I supposed that I was wrong,
> and It was only a crusade against druid to convert to Romans'
> religion, as some of the people of this mailing list suggest.

I'm not sure about all this since Buddhism is far and away off-topic,
though I don't think you need a hidden agenda in this forum as much
as some sort of agenda to creatively interpret history to the degree
I think you have. Druids in the early Middle Ages persecuted by
Christians? That was basically your statement and was what elicited
response from me because it varies so considerably from known history.

> A couple of messages later, I had discovered that the Roman began
> a proseletist holy war against a troupe of pacifical new age
> druids, and exterminate them in Galia, and then jump to Britannia
> to finish their work. I find myself that the themselves
> called "druids" of 6th and 7th century of Flanders and Low
> Countries against who St. Ouen and St Eligius predicate were really
> executed in 64BC.

Historians have written about some extreme practices of Druids, and
that it was perhaps their lack of pacifism that led to their
extinction. That leads to the question that if Druids stopped "non-
pacifist" practices were they even Druids anymore. More to the point
of my response, as I keep saying, I would personally be interested in
specific information that illustrates "Christian persecutions against
Druids (or anything similar)" and proselytzation- which is the
examples you provide- is not persecution.

Vale, et valete,

L. Fidelius Graecus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39332 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve, C. Fabius Buteo Modianus; salvete, omnes.

On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 08:56:08AM -0500, David Kling wrote:
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Marco Cassio Philippo salutem dicit
> I'm not convinced that it was Christianity per se that motivated the
> founding fathers in creating what is now called the United States. I believe
> it was the spirit that is prevalent within Masonry. A theistic current, but
> one built upon toleration, understanding, and cooperation. I daresay the
> Christianity of Pat Robertson is doing nothing for the welfare of this
> country, as does the "religious right." The United States was founded upon a
> spirit of toleration. Much of what the religious right attempts to
> accomplish has nothing to do with toleration, or the principles that Masonry
> espouses. I know a couple of Masons in Nova Roma who would probably agree
> with me.

And not only Masons. :)

A few quotes from the Founding Fathers:

''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
George Washington: The United States is in no sense founded upon
Christian Doctrine.

Thomas Paine: I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish Church,
by the Roman Church, by the Greek Church, by the Turkish Church, by the
Protestant Church, nor by any Church that I know of. My own mind is my own
Church.

Thomas Jefferson: The day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus,
by the Supreme Being as his Father, in the womb of a virgin, will be
classified with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of
Jupiter. But we may hope that the dawn of reason and the freedom of
thought in these United States will do away with this artificial
scaffolding, and restore to us the primitive and genuine doctrines of
this most venerated Reformer of human errors.

James Madison: During almost fifteen centuries the legal establishment
known as Christianity has been on trial, and what have been the fruits,
more or less, in all places? These are the fruits: pride, indolence,
ignorance, and arrogance in the clergy. Ignorance, arrogance, and
servility in the laity, and in both clergy and laity, superstition,
bigotry, and persecution.
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

No, the United States was not formed with Christianity as its basis.
Tolerance, freedom, individualism, - yes. Christianity, no - whatever the
current crop of politicians claim in order to pull the majority vote.

Of *anyone* in the world today, those who study history should be the
most aware of the tendency of politicians to rewrite it for their own
purposes.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Dum inter homines sumus, colamus humanitatem.
As long as we are among humans, let us be humane.
-- Seneca, "De ira"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39333 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve Cato,

Interestingly you brought up Kaiser, and it is quite a stretch to call his domain an "Empire" of course there is also the Tzar. Are we to also assume that they were also part of the Roman Empire just because they may have believed they were? Otherwise why those titles? They obviously thought of themselves as the inheritors of the Caesars, therefore of Rome itself. The same can be said of Byzantium after the sixth or seventh century. This is precisely why another name was devised for it. It was not any longer the same nation, civilization or culture. In order to understand them they had to be distinguished from each other. The Ethiopians believe they are the ancestors of one of the lost tribes of Israel. They very well could be but there is no way anyone could confuse the two distinctly different civilizations.

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: gaiusequitiuscato
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 8:45 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome


OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes.

Cassius Phillipus, I now you didn't intend it to come out as an insult
(which is why I modified my statement with "unwittingly"), and I do
not think you are necessarily anti-Christian. It is a natural
by-product of the restoration of a social entity (the res publica) one
of whose most fundamental elements (the religio romana) was crushed by
Christianity that there is a current of distaste for the practices of
the Church over the past coupla thousand years :-)

You wrote:

"Although this culture was founded on the Roman Culture and certainly
influenced by it, in my opinion it is a mistake to confuse the two
into one. There was a very big difference between the two, they are
not identical or even similar in nature. As big a difference as there
was between the Chinese and Japanese Culture. Yes they both had
Emperors and they both had Buddhism and similar writing systems but
that's where the comparison ends. They are completely different cultures."


It is unfortunately neither your right nor privilege to decide for the
Eastern Romans what or who they were; you cannot judge an historical
entity by the standards of contemporary scholarship or personal
preference. The Eastern Romans, and the rest of the contemporaneous
world, saw that entity as the Roman Empire, and so, in fact, it was.
The people of the Eastern Empire never knew or even imagined a phrase
like "Byzantine"; they knew they were Romans, absolutely nothing less.
Constantine I, in transferring the imperial capital to
Constantinople, transferred the identity of the Empire with it. The
Emperor in Constantinople held the title "Basileus Romaioi" ---
"Emperor of the Romans" --- until A.D. 1453.

For quite a long time, the identity of the Roman Empire had had less
and less to do with the crumbling, ineffective City on the Tiber.
Ravenna had long usurped the Eternal City's place as the focus of
Western military, political, and cultural identity.

The term "Byzantine" was coined by 18th century French and English
philosophers of the "Enlightenment" because they were convinced that
only corruption, decadence, and decay were products of the Eastern
Empire and so refused to use the terms "Greek" or "Roman"; they felt
that these terms belonged only to the ancient cultures in which they
found the beginnings of Western thought. They didn't pay much
attention to the corruption, decadence, and decay during the Western
Roman Empire between Augustus and Romulus Augustus because it did not
suit their intellectual and emotional needs. It was a form of
historical and ethical arrogance that has been overwhelmingly
dismissed by scholars, although the term itself became so predominant
that it survives.

In passing, remember that the political state that existed in Germany
from A.D. 1933-1945 is, in fact, referred to as "the Third Reich"; the
first was the Holy Roman Empire (called the "Holy Roman Empire of the
German Nation" after about A.D. 1450), and the Second was that under
Bismarck and Kaiser Wilhelm I (A.D. 1871-1918). It had nothing to do
with Roman Empire itself.

Valete bene,

Cato






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.1/169 - Release Date: 11/15/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39334 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
Salve -

On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:00:03AM -0800, raymond fuentes wrote:
> The one poster who reports this stuff lives in Queens
> where there is plenty of anti-Americanism, Im a cop, I
> see & hear it everyday.The Dancing On 911 HAPPENED

OK. References, please? Newspapers reporting it? TV news reports?
Photos? Police reports, which would SURELY have been filed? Police
records of hundreds of officers being called in to either a) haul away
the bodies of the Arabs who would have been killed by the non-Arabs
around them or b) protect the Arabs from being killed? Credible
eye-witness reports, even, recorded ANYWHERE by any credible news
source?

I await the flood of data impatiently. Surely, in this great country of
ours, where our shameless Liberal media, who will cover *anything* to
make a buck, there must be reams and mounds of reports to choose from.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Stultum est timere quod vitare non potes.
It is foolish to fear what you cannot avoid.
-- Cicero, "De officiis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39335 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Not alone.But Im willing to speak as others are afraid.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:12:52AM -0800, raymond fuentes wrote:
> To the person who identifies me as the one poster.Ive
> had more than a handful of cives contact off list that
> agree.The silent majority is exactly that.SILENT

Ah, yes - "the lurkers support me in email". That's the definitive
proof, of course, and I retire from the field with my head hung in
shame.


http://tinyurl.com/cdxez "The Lurkers Support Me In Email", by Jo Walton


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Nil desperandum!
Never despair!
-- Horace, "Carmina"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39336 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve Modianus,

I AM a Mason and you would be quite surprised at who else in Nova Roma is as well but it is none of my business to discuss that in this forum. Yes, Masonic thought runs through the USA founding fathers. Masonic though is not just Deist it is "religious" in nature. We firmly believe that religion is and should be a very important of society. Although Masons in other parts of the world should follow their own religious beliefs, in this country there isn't one single Lodge that does not use the Christian Bible (Both Testaments) as the centerpiece of its rituals. Don't confuse religion and religious beliefs with religious fanaticism. Our founding fathers came from many different Christian denominations but they were ALL devout Christians. To state otherwise would be to rewrite history. Which is exactly was is happening!

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: David Kling
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 8:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome


Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Marco Cassio Philippo salutem dicit
I'm not convinced that it was Christianity per se that motivated the
founding fathers in creating what is now called the United States. I believe
it was the spirit that is prevalent within Masonry. A theistic current, but
one built upon toleration, understanding, and cooperation. I daresay the
Christianity of Pat Robertson is doing nothing for the welfare of this
country, as does the "religious right." The United States was founded upon a
spirit of toleration. Much of what the religious right attempts to
accomplish has nothing to do with toleration, or the principles that Masonry
espouses. I know a couple of Masons in Nova Roma who would probably agree
with me.
Nova Roma is a great example of how the "principles" of toleration of
Masonry *can* function in our society. We have an organization that was
originally founded to promote the Religio Romana. It has become much more
than just a vehicle for the Religio, but still maintains that purpose. Nova
Roma is also accepting of people of all religious backgrounds, and not
simply one. We have different denominations of Christianity represented, and
many expressions of Pagan/Polytheistic traditions, as well as Jewish and
Buddhist practitioners. This is an excellent representation of how things
should be in the macronational world.
In conclusion, I do not believe the founding fathers of the United States
intended to create a Christian nation. An atheistic nation? No. But not
necessarily a Christian nation either. One does not have to follow the
dogmatic constraints of mainstream Christianity to be a person of faith, and
I believe the founding fathers of the United States recognized this.
Vale;
C. Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 11/15/05, Sensei Phil Perez <senseiphil@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I did not insult Christianity. Please don't get offended that easily over
> a discussion just because a statement that brings in Christianity is used.
> There were many reasons why the Roman Empire fell, in my opinion it was one
> of the underlying factors that contributed to it. I am not an anti-Semite or
> an anti-Christian. Christianity is what it is and it is true unto itself. It
> indeed became the force behind Western and European culture right up into
> the Twentieth Century. Although this culture was founded on the Roman
> Culture and certainly influenced by it, in my opinion it is a mistake to
> confuse the two into one. There was a very big difference between the two,
> they are not identical or even similar in nature. As big a difference as
> there was between the Chinese and Japanese Culture. Yes they both had
> Emperors and they both had Buddhism and similar writing systems but that's
> where the comparison ends. They are completely different cultures.
>
> European Feudalism and Roman Republicanism couldn't be further apart.
> Byzantium was so different from the original Rome that it had to be
> classified as Byzantium. Not Rome. I don't care what they considered
> themselves to be. The Germans of Hitler's time also considered themselves to
> be the inheritors of the Romans that's why they used the name "Dritte Reich"
> or Third Empire: 1. Roman Empire 2. Holy Roman Empire 3. German Empire. What
> did the rest of the world think of that? We also consider ourselves to be
> Romans. Do you think the macro-world around us also agree with that
> statement? Of course not, they think of us as a collection of people
> interested in Rome to the point of obsession but certainly Not Romans.
>
> If the USA becomes atheistic and completely socialized, we may still
> continue to call it The United States but it will have ceased to be the
> country that the founding fathers created. It would have nothing in common
> with it other than the name. This is precisely what happened to Rome except
> it was Christianity that changed it. The early Emperors, although they were
> insane in the way they went about it were not all that incorrect in their
> assessment of what would happen to the Roman culture and empire if
> Christianity were to become the dominant religion in the Empire.
>
> Vires et honos,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
Roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.1/169 - Release Date: 11/15/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39337 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes.

Cassius Philippus, you're doing a bit of mixing apples and oranges :-)

The vast difference between the Eastern Roman Empire's identity and
the self-identification in 15th century Russia and 19th century
Germany lies with the fact that the whole known world recognized,
accepted, and referreed to the Eastern Emire as the "Roman Empire".
You cannot simply flip through historical analogies without
referencing the political, cultural, and societal framework within
which these seperate analogies fall --- and thereby making them no
longer analogous.

The first use of the title "Caesar" outside the Roman sphere was in
A.D. 913, when Simeon I of Bulgaria claimed it after a stunning
victory over the Eastern Empire. He proclaimed himself "Tsar and
Autocrat of all the Bulgarians and Greeks" --- *not* of the "Romans".

In A.D. 1547, Ivan IV "Grozny" ("the Terrifying", a more accurate
translation than "the Terrible") dropped the title "Grand Duke of All
the Russias" and claimed the title "Tsar of All the Russias" (again,
*not* the "Romans") to mark not a continuation of the Roman Empire but
to mark the change in the nature of the Russian political identity
itself; it had simply become synonymous with "emperor". Peter I "the
Great" actually adopted the transliterated title "Imperator" in A.D.
1721, to bring Russia closer to the European model.

On a side note, of course, Moscow did lay claim to the title "the
Third Rome", but no-one really noticed or cared, which is significant
in this context.

The same applies to the use of "Kaiser" in Germany: remember that it
was the "Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation", once more *not* of
the "Romans"; Rome had become an almost mythical Ideal to which rulers
aspired. The adoption of "Kaiser" signified the unification of
Germany as a new coherent political identity and therefore required a
new title for its ruler.

As I've explained, the term "Byzantine" was created by arrogant and
self-important philosophers who disdained any form of religious
autocracy and therefore painted the Eastern Empire with a vicious and
unhistoric brush; it vilified the Eastern Empire without any heed to
the actual facts of its existence or the unparalleled importance it
held in the history of the Mediterranean, simply because it did not
fit their romantic idea of what the Romans "should" have been like.
It did not exist until the 1700s and so has absolutely nothing
whatsoever to do with the identification of the Eastern Roman Empire
as the Roman Empire itself.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39338 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve Cato,

OK, lets take this hypothetical:

In two thousand years - especially if we have a nuclear holocaust and only sparse information exists about our times will some historians naturally assume that the USA was actually part of the British Empire because we shared the same values, religious beliefs and language? Are we? Your analogies can also go both ways my friend.

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: gaiusequitiuscato
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 10:14 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome


OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes.

Cassius Philippus, you're doing a bit of mixing apples and oranges :-)

The vast difference between the Eastern Roman Empire's identity and
the self-identification in 15th century Russia and 19th century
Germany lies with the fact that the whole known world recognized,
accepted, and referreed to the Eastern Emire as the "Roman Empire".
You cannot simply flip through historical analogies without
referencing the political, cultural, and societal framework within
which these seperate analogies fall --- and thereby making them no
longer analogous.

The first use of the title "Caesar" outside the Roman sphere was in
A.D. 913, when Simeon I of Bulgaria claimed it after a stunning
victory over the Eastern Empire. He proclaimed himself "Tsar and
Autocrat of all the Bulgarians and Greeks" --- *not* of the "Romans".

In A.D. 1547, Ivan IV "Grozny" ("the Terrifying", a more accurate
translation than "the Terrible") dropped the title "Grand Duke of All
the Russias" and claimed the title "Tsar of All the Russias" (again,
*not* the "Romans") to mark not a continuation of the Roman Empire but
to mark the change in the nature of the Russian political identity
itself; it had simply become synonymous with "emperor". Peter I "the
Great" actually adopted the transliterated title "Imperator" in A.D.
1721, to bring Russia closer to the European model.

On a side note, of course, Moscow did lay claim to the title "the
Third Rome", but no-one really noticed or cared, which is significant
in this context.

The same applies to the use of "Kaiser" in Germany: remember that it
was the "Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation", once more *not* of
the "Romans"; Rome had become an almost mythical Ideal to which rulers
aspired. The adoption of "Kaiser" signified the unification of
Germany as a new coherent political identity and therefore required a
new title for its ruler.

As I've explained, the term "Byzantine" was created by arrogant and
self-important philosophers who disdained any form of religious
autocracy and therefore painted the Eastern Empire with a vicious and
unhistoric brush; it vilified the Eastern Empire without any heed to
the actual facts of its existence or the unparalleled importance it
held in the history of the Mediterranean, simply because it did not
fit their romantic idea of what the Romans "should" have been like.
It did not exist until the 1700s and so has absolutely nothing
whatsoever to do with the identification of the Eastern Roman Empire
as the Roman Empire itself.

Valete bene,

Cato








SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
Roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.2/170 - Release Date: 11/15/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39339 From: David Santo Orcero Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Salve Omnes
Salvete Omnes!

> Even outside this discourse, I'd be interested in some evidence of
> that. I've never heard of Druids in the seventh century and at least
> as I'm concerned some Druidic traditions or customs do not a make a
> Druid, particularly if they worship Jesus Christ.

The writtings of St. Eligius and St. Ouen. In 7th century, the most
accurate sources are those related of the chistrianity. Unfortunately,
there is not a "Suetonious" of that age. :-( The sources are not as good
as Roman historiators were. The sources in that centuries frecuently are
not explanations of what exactly happended, but trascripts of speeches of
bishops, and you have to discovered what really happened with that
particular sources.

> > against druidical movement. This is part of one of his preaches.
> > But you know how those things works, only renember the history of
> > the bishop Cirilus and Hypatia.
>
> (Hypatia? Don't get me started...) That's where we disagree. What you
> call a Druidical movement, I call cultural vestiges and folk beliefs.

Well, I talk about this particular movement. They did not workship Jesus,
they were animist, and the mainline of the religion have not changed since
celtic. But the role of the druids had, in fact _do_ changed. The druids
were no more warlords. That is what I have talked several messages ago.
Maybe the root of the discusion is that we don't call druids to the same
thing. I call it to the priests of a particular religion, and you focus on
the social and military role of the druids before Roma invasion.


> would have even met a Druid. And to the King Arthur reference, I
> compare your transposition of Druids from the Dark Ages (or earlier)
> to the Middle Ages with the fictional view of King Arthur being a
> Medieval King rather than a Dark Ages warlord.


Literaly, I talked to the begining of the middle age as the end of the
druidist religion. I have never said that the druidist religion stayed the
full middle age on the land of the former roman empire. In fact, it was
not only the end of this religion: christianism sweep out lots of "pagan"
belives, several of them rather strange from our modern point of view.
(Yes, Hypatia's also; her death is marked as the begining of the
end of the Pitagorian cult) I am not making here any "moral evaluation" of
this fact, I only mark that in few centuries several religions
dissapeared, and that the beggining of the middle age was the crossline
where all this religions faded. Any serious historiator will confirm you
that a religion does not disapear from one day to another, but fades
during several years. And that fading enter to the begining of the middle
age. That was what I said.

> I think you have. Druids in the early Middle Ages persecuted by
> Christians? That was basically your statement and was what elicited
> response from me because it varies so considerably from known history.

In the pass from old age to the early begining of middle age, some
"pagan" cults were practiced in private. Sorry, not all the empire saw
the light and converted in mass to the christianity. Excactly in what part
the last truly beliver of druidist religion died, we will never know. But
belive me: the bishops had to work hard to erradicate non-christian
belives, and some of them kept their religion untill their death. What you
have called as deviations of christian norm were in fact mostly syncretic
cults. It was no so easy as hollywood films make us to belive. And the
souces are the writtins of that bishops, what will tell us only a side of
the history. Anyway, acording to the area of influencie of the bishop and
its writtings, you can take a good idea that what was really being
practiced by the common people.



> extinction. That leads to the question that if Druids stopped "non-
> pacifist" practices were they even Druids anymore.


That is the point. I consider druid the priest of that particular animist
religion, you only consider the celltii religous warlord.

> More to the point
> of my response, as I keep saying, I would personally be interested in
> specific information that illustrates "Christian persecutions against
> Druids (or anything similar)" and proselytzation- which is the
> examples you provide- is not persecution.

Yes, you are true. The writtings talk about proselytzation against that
religion, not prosecution.I don't know a physical prove of physical
prosecution of that particular cult by christians inside the former roman
empire. Anyway, there is fact of physical prosecution other pagan
religions (Pitagorians in Alexandria, as example), syncretic cults and
chirstianity variations during several centuries. And nearly always have
the same scheme: a bishop, well intencionated (or not, there were
different cases), give some speechs about a particular group. After that,
a mass of uncontrolated belivers destroyed the temple, or kill a priest
of that particular religion, or both. On the ruins of the pagan temple,
the bishop built a church. It is not a too hard to do the jump to suppose
that what they did with several cults was common.

Yours:

Lucius Cornelius Malacitanus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39340 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve Cassius (may I shorten your name this way politely?)!

I gotta go get a root canal (obviously the Roman toothbrush got lost
on its way to my apartment) but I will reply ASAP.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39341 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome
Salve Cato,

Of course buddy. I wouldn't even know the honorific way of salutation for yours (yet ;-). We are cut from the same cloth (just sewn with a different stitch) my friend, we cannot stop talking about these topics. I hope you are never truly offended by my "opinions" I certainly have never taken offense by any of yours. I am rather blunt I'm afraid when I respond to these messages since I am always in the company of my 6 year old daughter when I am by my computer. Otherwise I would find more concrete examples of my points of view.

I try to stay on the more obvious examples because of this. The more obscure, the more we need to bring in "proof".

I hope he uses gas. It's a lot more pleasant.

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: gaiusequitiuscato
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 10:28 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Tenney Frank and the Fall of Rome


Salve Cassius (may I shorten your name this way politely?)!

I gotta go get a root canal (obviously the Roman toothbrush got lost
on its way to my apartment) but I will reply ASAP.

Vale bene,

Cato





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.2/170 - Release Date: 11/15/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39342 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Re: the Fall of Rome.Has history taught us nothing?
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

I don't mean to criticise anyone in particular, but I
would ask our citizens in the U.S. to remember that
they are not the only people in this forum. There's
nothing wrong with discussing macronational politics
here, and although I personally find them profoundly
boring I wouldn't say that there's anything wrong even
with what is being done at the moment, specifically
the acting out of debates from U.S. domestic politics
which have almost no relevance either to Nova Roma or
to any other country. That's fine, people should be
free to say what they want here.

What I would ask of those who are participating in
these discussions is that they briefly ask themselves,
"why aren't we getting 30 messages a day of citizens
from Hispania arguing about current Spanish or
Portuguese politics?" The reason is, essentially, that
they have their own forum specifically for Hispani and
if they want to argue about macronational domestic
politics they (I presume) do it there. There is a
tendency for our U.S. citizens, or perhaps I should
say more generally our North American citizens, to
treat this forum as a sort of glorified provincial
e-mail list. There is talk of "us" and "we", meaning
Americans. This is precisely the sort of thing which
puts non-Americans off this list and which, more
generally, reduces our ability to recruit and retain
citizens in other countries and our ability to get
them involved on an international level in Nova Roma.

C. Equitius and I talked briefly in Rome in the summer
about the idea of having a specific e-mail list for
U.S. citizens of Nova Roma. (There is already a
similar list for Europe, though it is virtually dead
because most European activity is coordinated through
provincial lists or by private e-mail.) It has its
advantages and its disadvantages. We don't want to
create divisions within the population, and it would
be a shame if such a move were to divert interesting
discussions away from this forum. But on the other
hand it would at least counteract the tendency of some
U.S. citizens to treat this forum, which is meant to
be for everyone, as a specifically American forum. I
don't want to get into a detailed discussion of the
pros and cons here, but I mention it just to
illustrate the fact that sometimes it seems like some
people treat this list as if it were already a
specifically American list.

So if you find yourself getting involved in a
discussion about domestic macronational politics
(international politics are different, of course,
because they will naturally be of interest to people
from different countries), I ask you to do two things:

1. ask yourself whether this is really the best or
most convenient list to have the discussion in,

and, more importantly,

2. when you are participating in the discussion,
please try to indicate in your words that you are at
least aware that there are people from other countries
in this forum and that "we" and "us", unless otherwise
specified, means "citizens of Nova Roma".



___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39343 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-11-15
Subject: Certamen Petronianum
A. Apollonius C. Curio omnibus tribunis plebis sal.

The results of the certamen Petronianum were due to be
announced during the ludi Plebeji, which are now
nearly over. Is it your intention to announce the
results and, if not, can you tell us how and when they
will be announced?



___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com