Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Nov 18-21, 2005

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39518 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39519 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39520 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39521 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: LUDI PLEBEII: final race
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39522 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: LUDI PLEBEII: final race
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39523 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39524 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: The Seven Hills of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39525 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39526 From: FAC Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39527 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39528 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39529 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39530 From: RANDALL HERRERA RIOS Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: TO THE WINNER OF THE 1ST CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39531 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39532 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: a.d. XIII Kal. Dec.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39533 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39534 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39535 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39536 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39537 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39538 From: David Kling Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39539 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39540 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39541 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39542 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39543 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39544 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39545 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39546 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39547 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39548 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39549 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39550 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39551 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39552 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39553 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39554 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39555 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39556 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39557 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39558 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39559 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39560 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39561 From: A.M. Nelson Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39562 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39563 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39564 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39565 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39566 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39567 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39568 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39569 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39570 From: Maior Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39571 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39572 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39573 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39574 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39575 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: TO THE WINNER OF THE 1ST CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39576 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39577 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39578 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39579 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39580 From: David Kling Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39581 From: Maior Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39582 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39583 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39584 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39585 From: Gaia Apollonia Silana Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39586 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39587 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39588 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Gibson's Maccabee Movie - Crash Course On The Revolt / Rome's Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39590 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39591 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: a.d. XII Kal. Dec.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39592 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: CHARIOT RACES: Gratias magna victoria
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39593 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Gibson's Maccabee Movie - Crash Course On The Revolt / Rome's H
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39594 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39595 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39596 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39597 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39598 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39599 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39600 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39601 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: I said I was sorry.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39602 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Violations of the Praetorian Edictum ?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39603 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39604 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Happy Holidays, till we speak again.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39605 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: David Meadows' explorator 8.30
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39606 From: lucius_fidelius Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Farewell
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39607 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39608 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Violations of the Praetorian Edictum ?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39609 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39610 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Violations of the Praetorian Edictum ?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39611 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39612 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39613 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39614 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39615 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Farewell
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39616 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39617 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39618 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39619 From: FAC Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39620 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39621 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39622 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Some Possible Solutions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39623 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39624 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39625 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Some Possible Solutions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39626 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Some Possible Solutions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39627 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Farewell
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39628 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39629 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39630 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39631 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: American Police protect ALL people, its part of our oath.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39632 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39633 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39634 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39635 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39636 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: American Police protect ALL people, its part of our oath.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39637 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Yahoo! Policies FYI....regarding Moderation, 'Off-Topic' posts, etc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39638 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: American Police protect ALL people, its part of our oath.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39639 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Police duty, was Re: Farewell
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39640 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39641 From: Maior Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL whither Caesariensis...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39642 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL (Pompeia's Moderation)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39643 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39644 From: Gaia Apollonia Silana Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39645 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Yahoo! Policies FYI....regarding Moderation, 'Off-Topic' posts,
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39646 From: rocknrockabilly Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Some Possible Solutions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39647 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39648 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39649 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39650 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: American Police protect ALL people, its part of our oath.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39651 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Some Possible Solutions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39652 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: American Police protect ALL people, its part of our oath.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39653 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Some Possible Solutions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39654 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Some Possible Solutions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39655 From: Maior Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL whither Caesariensis...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39656 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL whither Caesariensis...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39657 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL whither Caesariensis...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39658 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL (Pompeia's Moderation)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39659 From: Maior Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL whither Caesariensis...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39660 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL whither Caesariensis...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39661 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39662 From: Gaia Apollonia Silana Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Seeking suggestions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39663 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Clarification of post #39661
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39664 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Seeking suggestions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39665 From: Maior Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Seeking suggestions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39666 From: Octavius Giraldo-Vay Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Pilate and Jesus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39667 From: Gaia Apollonia Silana Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Seeking suggestions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39668 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL- a Commentary
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39669 From: Gaia Apollonia Silana Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Seeking suggestions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39670 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Seeking suggestions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39671 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Pilate and Jesus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39672 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: On entering the Ordo Equester
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39673 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Yahoo! Policies FYI....regarding Moderation, 'Off-Topic' post...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39674 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Seeking suggestions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39676 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: a.d. XI Kal. Dec.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39677 From: Marcus Iulius Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Edictum Praetoricium III -- corrections of the minor errors in the
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39678 From: A.M. Nelson Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39679 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: American Police protect ALL people, its part of our oath.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39680 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: American Police protect ALL people, its part of our oath.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39681 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Seeking suggestions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39682 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: NR, Roma and Dogs of War
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39683 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: NR, Roma and Dogs of War
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39684 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: American Police protect ALL people, its part of our oath.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39685 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: American Police protect ALL people, its part of our oath.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39686 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetoricium III -- corrections of the minor errors in
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39687 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Seeking suggestions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39688 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39689 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39690 From: Caius Curius Saturninus Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: calendars - on sale during december
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39691 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL- a Commentary
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39692 From: lucius_fidelius Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Article on the Getty Villa in California
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39693 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39694 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Article on the Getty Villa in California
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39695 From: David Kling Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus - Candidate for Consul



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39518 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Salve Tite Octavi Pi,

LOL, where are our other priests today? You'll need one on the back of
your chariot saying, remember Tite Octavi,thou art mortal!.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus


>
> Salve, T. Artoria Marcella.
>
> Thank you and I'm glad you liked it. As my head is still swelling
with
> pride (or is it hubris?), I'm sure my next story will be available in
> your local bookstore. ;)
>
> Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39519 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Salve, G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana.

G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana wrote:
> I've just read your entry in the Certamen Petronianum. I am awed.

I'm glad you liked it and that most other people who have also seem to
like it...but awed? I am not sure it, or I, deserve such praise.

G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana wrote:
> Congratulations, and magnas gratias tibia ago, for bringing such
> a treasure to us all. Tight, clean structure, rising to a poignant
> book-end, and a subdued style make this story feel like a painting
> in the finest miniaturist style.

Thank you very much and you're welcome. It's very nice to get such
positive feedback on my style, but surely there must be something I
could improve on? Or do you want my head to no longer fit through the
openings in my shirts?

G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana wrote:
> And you touch on one of my life-long favorite themes: how oridinary
> people like your sheep-herder and his wife are entwined with the
> legendary and the mighty of history.

Yes, this is what I was looking for. I myself have always been
fascinated with the giants of history, the sheer scale of what they have
wrought, as I am sure many others have. However, both to provide a
backdrop to their acts and a link of commonality with the history, the
"little people" need to be emphasised.

If their contributions are emphasised just right, then perhaps the
people reading the story will realise that they can influence the future
of the world, that apathy is the only way to really and truly fail.

Erhmm...pardon my political and ideological ramblings. :)

G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana wrote:
> The rest of us now have a good idea of the kind of standards
> we need to rise to.

Darn it. There goes my regular t-shirts. Do I have any v-necks, those
might still fit...

But seriously, you shouldn't be intimidated by the prose of anyone.
Nobody should. If I'd been, which I nearly was, I wouldn't have
submitted my entry before Dr. McCullough and Prof. Wiseman. Take the
chance, I did and do you see me regretting it? ;)

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39520 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) wrote:
> LOL, where are our other priests today? You'll need one on the back
> of your chariot saying, remember Tite Octavi,thou art mortal!.

Salve, Quinte Suetoni Pauline.

They are busy making offerings before my new altar. I may be mortal, but
my stories will last as long as mankind! To quote Shelley, "My name is
Ozymandias, King of Kings, Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!"

(All said in good humour, of course.)

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39521 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: LUDI PLEBEII: final race
Congratulations to G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana! The Gods have favored you with victory and it is well deserved!
*catches some of the roses thrown into the crowd and hands one to G. Equitius Marinus**
I hear Crassus is coming next time as a T-Rex. Just so long as I have a good seat to see that!
Special kudos to C. Curius Saturninus for the wonderful and exciting commentary! Well done indeed! **applause**
Come, dear Goofus, let me give you a ride in my chariot to the Tavern of the Elephant for the celebration. Maximus is off somewhere doing his own celebrating, but not to worry. I can handle a chariot on my own. It's easy to find mine in the chariot parking lot. It's the one with the bumper stick on the back that reads: "I LOVE CHARIOT RACING!!!"
Can't wait till the next time!

Vale bene,

Maxima Valeria Messallina


---------------------------------
Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39522 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: LUDI PLEBEII: final race
Salve Messallina,

Maxima Valeria Messallina
> *catches some of the roses thrown into the crowd and hands one
> to G. Equitius Marinus**

Why, thank you!

Far be it from me to decline such a gracious offer!

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39523 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Salve, Titus Octavius Pius Amice!

[ piggybacking on a post, please excuse ]

On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 07:48:18AM -0000, Maior wrote:
> M. Hortensia T.Octavio spd;
> Euge! many congratulations to you Tite Octavi, you must be
> absolutely thrilled to bits to have such a distinguished jury award
> you the prize.

I would like to add my own (belated) congratulations to everyone else's
- my most sincere felicitations on your sucess, amice! It gave me great
pleasure to see you win this well-deserved honor. Please don't forget
your friends when you are wealthy and famous. :)


Optime vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate.
Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily.
-- Principle known as Occam's Razor, "used for example in physics."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39524 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: The Seven Hills of Rome
Salvete, omnes -

I just ran across a site - a little crudely put together, but still
useful - that focuses on geographical/political/historical maps, etc.
for Europe. Part of the site is dedicated to Roma Antiqua, and has some
very interesting overviews; e.g.,

http://www.euratlas.net/Roma/7colli.htm

shows the seven hills of Rome, and

http://www.euratlas.net/Roma/rome100.htm

represents the various districts (zoomable) overlaid on that map. I
can't vouch for its accuracy, but it's certainly interesting to explore.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Duo cum faciunt idem, non est idem.
When two do the same thing, it isn't the same (i.e. one can get away with doing
something while another cannot).
-- Terence, "Adelphoe". Cf. "quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39525 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Salve Tite Octave Pie,

Congratulations. A fine piece of literature!

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: Benjamin A. Okopnik
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !


Salve, Titus Octavius Pius Amice!

[ piggybacking on a post, please excuse ]

On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 07:48:18AM -0000, Maior wrote:
> M. Hortensia T.Octavio spd;
> Euge! many congratulations to you Tite Octavi, you must be
> absolutely thrilled to bits to have such a distinguished jury award
> you the prize.

I would like to add my own (belated) congratulations to everyone else's
- my most sincere felicitations on your sucess, amice! It gave me great
pleasure to see you win this well-deserved honor. Please don't forget
your friends when you are wealthy and famous. :)


Optime vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate.
Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily.
-- Principle known as Occam's Razor, "used for example in physics."


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.3/174 - Release Date: 11/17/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39526 From: FAC Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Salve Pius,

> Thank you, Consul. I am glad you appreciated my story, and I am
indeed
> honoured by the award.

Yes, I like it, it's very interesting.

Maybe if we'ld continue the Certamen, we could publish a book with
all the tales written during the next years.

> What are you doing up this late on a weekday?

Yes, I know, it's late for "normal people". But not for me, my
broken left arm forces me at home and sometimes at hospital, so I
can be up during the night and wake up in the late morning ;-)

> And why am I up and active
> enough to answer within five minutes? Oh tempora, oh mores.

Excellent, very fast :-D

Vale
FAC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39527 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Sensei Phil Perez wrote:
> Congratulations. A fine piece of literature!

Salve, Marce Cassi Philippe.

Thanks, I'm glad you liked it! :)

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39528 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Benjamin A. Okopnik wrote:
> I would like to add my own (belated) congratulations to everyone else's
> - my most sincere felicitations on your sucess, amice! It gave me great
> pleasure to see you win this well-deserved honor. Please don't forget
> your friends when you are wealthy and famous. :)

Salve, Cai Minuci Scaevola.

Thank you very much. I'm not sure I deserve the honour, as I feel
certain other participants must have worked harder than myself, but I am
nonetheless happy to have been recognised for my talent and a sincere
effort.

By the way, good sir, who are you?

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.

P.S. I hope you've read, or take the time to read, the story. Feel free
to comment, in public or in private. I can take criticism. :)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39529 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-11-18
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
Salve, Caesar.

FAC wrote:
> Maybe if we'ld continue the Certamen, we could publish a book with
> all the tales written during the next years.

Now that sounds like an idea! The rules of the contest states:

"Nova Roma reserves the right to publish or broadcast the five best
tales, in any medium or media, any number of times and at any stage in
the future."

So with each story being less than 3000 words, or 8 pages, five entries
each year means 40 pages a year. In 5 years, an anthology of some 200
pages should be possible.

I'd buy a copy! :)

FAC wrote:
> Yes, I know, it's late for "normal people". But not for me, my
> broken left arm forces me at home and sometimes at hospital, so I
> can be up during the night and wake up in the late morning ;-)

And today I'm up at almost 3AM, without your excuse. Hmm...I might have
mildly sprained my ancle the day before yesterday, does that count?

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39530 From: RANDALL HERRERA RIOS Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: TO THE WINNER OF THE 1ST CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM
SERVIVS IVLIVS PERTINAX TITO OCTAVIO PIO

Salve Pi

From the sunny country of Costa Rica IÂ’ve got news for
you... YOUR VICTORY SHOOK US LIKE AN EARTHQUAKE...
AND WE ARE STILL TREMBLING WITH JOY AND HAPPINESS!!!


Now YOU fly on the wings of heavenly Victory. I pray
the GODS may give you everlasting inspiration to
keep on writing and to keep on delighting us with such
good literature...

I would say more... BUT I CANÂ’T WAIT TO READ YOUR
NOVEL!!!

VALE

Servius Iulius Pertinax



______________________________________________
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!
Nuevos servicios, más seguridad
http://correo.yahoo.es
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39531 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Farewell...
As A proud Roman & civi that is scorned by most for my
pro-western approach.I leave liberal NR & return to
the US ARMY as an officer.Congrats,youre rid of me.

S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39532 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: a.d. XIII Kal. Dec.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem XIII Kalendas Decembris; haec dies comitialis est.

"Fabius immediately summoned his troops to assembly, and appealed to
them to show the same courage with which they had defended the
republic from a brave and determined foe in protecting from the
unrestrained ferocity of the Dictator the man under whose auspices and
generalship they had been victorious. He was coming, maddened by
jealousy, exasperated at another man's merits and good fortune,
furious because the republic had triumphed in his absence. If it were
in his power to change the fortune of the day, he would rather that
victory rested with the Samnites than with the Romans. He kept talking
about the contempt of orders as though the reason why he forbade all
fighting were not precisely the same as that which makes him vexed now
that we have fought. Then, prompted by jealousy, he wanted to suppress
the merits of others and deprive of their arms men who were most eager
to use them, so as to prevent their being employed in his absence; now
he is exasperated and furious because the soldiers were not crippled
or defenceless though L. Papirius was not with them, and because Q.
Fabius considered himself Master of the Horse and not the lacquey of
the Dictator. What would he have done if, as often happens amid the
chances of war, the battle had gone against us, seeing that now, after
the enemy has been thoroughly defeated and a victory won for the
republic which even under his unrivalled generalship could not have
been more complete, he is actually menacing the Master of the Horse
with punishment! He would, were it in his power, treat all with equal
severity, not only the Master of Horse but the military tribunes, the
centurions, the men of the rank and file. Jealousy, like lightning,
strikes the summits, and because he cannot reach all he has selected
one man as his victim whom he regards as the chief conspirator-your
general. If he should succeed in crushing him and quenching the
splendour of his success, he will treat this army as a victor treats
the vanquished and with the same ruthlessness which he has been
allowed to practice on the Master of the Horse. In defending his cause
they will be defending the liberty of all. If the Dictator sees that
the army is as united in guarding its victory as it was in fighting
for it, and that one man's safety is the common concern of all, he
will bring himself to a calmer frame of mind. His closing words were:
" I entrust my fortunes and my life to your fidelity and courage." His
words were greeted with universal shouts of approval. They told him
not to be dismayed or depressed, no man should harm him while the
legions of Rome were alive." - Livy, History of Rome 8.31


On this day in A.D. 1492, Christopher Columbus discovered Puerto Rico.

On this day in A.D. 1600, King Charles I of England was born.


Today is the National Holiday of the Principality of Monaco. Hercules
was said to have passed through the area, and the founders of the
nearby Greek colony, the Phoceans, built him a "single temple"
("monoikos") to commemorate the event.

Monaco was re-founded in 1215 as a colony of Genoa. Monaco has been
ruled by the House of Grimaldi since 1297, when Francois Grimaldi
seized the fortress protecting the famous rock while dressed up as a
Franciscan monk ("monaco" in Italian); the only exception to this was
from 1793 to 1814, when Monaco was under French control. Designated as
a protectorate of Sardinia from 1815 until 1860 by the Congress of
Vienna, Monaco's sovereignty was recognised by the Franco-Monegasque
Treaty of 1861. The Prince of Monaco was an absolute ruler until a
constitution was promulgated in 1911. In July 1918, a treaty was
signed providing for limited French protection over Monaco. The
treaty, written into the Treaty of Versailles, established that
Monegasque policy would be aligned with French political, military,
and economic interests.

Prince Rainier III acceded to the throne following the death of his
grandfather, Prince Louis II, in 1949. A new constitution, proclaimed
in 1962, abolished capital punishment, provided for female suffrage,
and established a Supreme Court to guarantee fundamental liberties. In
1993, Monaco became an official member of the United Nations with full
voting rights. In 2002, a new treaty between France and Monaco
clarifies that if there are no heirs to carry on the dynasty, the
Principality will remain an independent nation rather than revert to
the French. Monaco's military defence, however, is still the
responsibility of France.

Prince Rainer will be crowned today as ruler of Monaco.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy, Monaco (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monaco)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39533 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
M. Lucretius Agricola M. Flavio Fidei s.p.d.

I don't understand this at all. Sometimes I don't agree with you,
sure, and sometimes your ideas are opposed, sure, but you yourself
said you get some quiet support. Nowhere have I seen scorn for you as
a person or a citizen.

I personally would be pleased indeed were you not to leave. I feel
there is room for all views on macronational issues as long as we all
keep sight of our common interest in Romanitas.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
>
> As A proud Roman & civi that is scorned by most for my
> pro-western approach.I leave liberal NR & return to
> the US ARMY as an officer.Congrats,youre rid of me.
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39534 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve,

I wish you wouldn't go. I actually liked reading your posts. Please stay.
I'm planning on returning to the US Army as an officer too by the way. Bona
fortuna. Mvlti svnt vocati, pavci vero electi.

Vale,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia

----- Original Message -----
From: "raymond fuentes" <praefectus2324@...>
To: <nova-roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 5:26 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Farewell...


> As A proud Roman & civi that is scorned by most for my
> pro-western approach.I leave liberal NR & return to
> the US ARMY as an officer.Congrats,youre rid of me.
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39535 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salvete omnes,

A real Roman departs our midst to do what real Romans have always done: To fight Barbarians! The rest of us can continue to sit here in the forum and talk all the nonsense we want. Our rights to do so protected by young men like Flavius. Yes, even those of us who do not live in the USA. What he goes to fight will endanger us all sooner or later if not stopped in its tracks. The USA has drawn a line in the sand so it won't have to be drawn in our streets. May the gods of Rome protect him as well as the Supreme Being he may believe in.

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: raymond fuentes
To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 5:26 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Farewell...


As A proud Roman & civi that is scorned by most for my
pro-western approach.I leave liberal NR & return to
the US ARMY as an officer.Congrats,youre rid of me.

S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/175 - Release Date: 11/18/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39536 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus M. Flavio Fidei salutem:

I don't understand why do you want to leave us. If you feel yourself Roman, as you' ve written many times, you belong in the New Rome. If you would like to leave Nova Roma, I have to ask the question whether you are indeed a devoted Roman citizen. Do not care for other citizens' personal opinion: you are a Nova Roman, a citizen of the Reborning Rome -- but if you leave us, you won't be more... Please consider that!

Cura ut valeas quam potest optime, Marce Flavi!

CN CORN LENTVLVS


"M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@...> ha scritto: M. Lucretius Agricola M. Flavio Fidei s.p.d.

I don't understand this at all. Sometimes I don't agree with you,
sure, and sometimes your ideas are opposed, sure, but you yourself
said you get some quiet support. Nowhere have I seen scorn for you as
a person or a citizen.

I personally would be pleased indeed were you not to leave. I feel
there is room for all views on macronational issues as long as we all
keep sight of our common interest in Romanitas.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
>
> As A proud Roman & civi that is scorned by most for my
> pro-western approach.I leave liberal NR & return to
> the US ARMY as an officer.Congrats,youre rid of me.
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen




Cnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
Accensus Consulis Fr. Apuli Caesaris
Scriba Aedilis Curulis L. Iulii Sullae
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae Scholasticae Senior
Scriba Magistri Araneari Q. Cassi Calvi Iunior
Sodalis Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Latinista, Classicus Philologus

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39537 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve M. Flavi Fide,

I think everyone here would rather see you stay in NR. I just wanted
to ask you how you think things would be different in the us army as
far as liberal and social attitudes are concerned? I see many of your
liberal American senators with serious clout, spouting off with views
totally contrary to yours on TV are all ex- marines and army or navy.
A few of our girls I know and respect very much in NR are ex army,
one in the navy yet and I believe another had been to the middle east
yet they are liberal at times in their views.

Finally, if you go back to the forces, you won't be facing or
fighting mouthy hippy liberals; they'll be far more conservative,
tenacious and nastier with their words and actions and far to the
right of Atilla The Hun.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
<cn_corn_lent@y...> wrote:
>
> Cn. Cornelius Lentulus M. Flavio Fidei salutem:
>
> I don't understand why do you want to leave us. If you feel
yourself Roman, as you' ve written many times, you belong in the New
Rome. If you would like to leave Nova Roma, I have to ask the
question whether you are indeed a devoted Roman citizen. Do not care
for other citizens' personal opinion: you are a Nova Roman, a
citizen of the Reborning Rome -- but if you leave us, you won't be
more... Please consider that!
>
> Cura ut valeas quam potest optime, Marce Flavi!
>
> CN CORN LENTVLVS
>
>
> "M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@y...> ha scritto: M.
Lucretius Agricola M. Flavio Fidei s.p.d.
>
> I don't understand this at all. Sometimes I don't agree with you,
> sure, and sometimes your ideas are opposed, sure, but you yourself
> said you get some quiet support. Nowhere have I seen scorn for
you as
> a person or a citizen.
>
> I personally would be pleased indeed were you not to leave. I feel
> there is room for all views on macronational issues as long as we
all
> keep sight of our common interest in Romanitas.
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
> <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> >
> > As A proud Roman & civi that is scorned by most for my
> > pro-western approach.I leave liberal NR & return to
> > the US ARMY as an officer.Congrats,youre rid of me.
> >
> > S P Q R
> >
> > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> >
> > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
> Cnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
> Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
> Accensus Consulis Fr. Apuli Caesaris
> Scriba Aedilis Curulis L. Iulii Sullae
> Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae Scholasticae Senior
> Scriba Magistri Araneari Q. Cassi Calvi Iunior
> Sodalis Sodalitatis Latinitatis
> Latinista, Classicus Philologus
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39538 From: David Kling Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve;
I have come under attack several times in Nova Roma, from several sides.
Its part of being a Roman who voices his or her opinion. I don't understand
exactly what you mean by "liberal" Nova Roma. There are several here who are
more "liberal" than I, and some who are more conservative. I think Nova Roma
is a good cross section of political ideologies.
If you feel you must go, then go. If you return then welcome back.
Otherwise, go in peace.
Vale;
C. Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 11/19/05, raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@...> wrote:
>
> As A proud Roman & civi that is scorned by most for my
> pro-western approach.I leave liberal NR & return to
> the US ARMY as an officer.Congrats,youre rid of me.
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39539 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
I fight a losing battle with the left everyday as a
policeman and I am miserable doing it.I am more
comfortable fighting amongst the right...I fear for
the West
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mjk@...>
wrote:
> Salve M. Flavi Fide,
>
> I think everyone here would rather see you stay in
NR. I just wanted
> to ask you how you think things would be different
in the us army as
> far as liberal and social attitudes are concerned? I
see many of your
> liberal American senators with serious clout,
spouting off with views
> totally contrary to yours on TV are all ex- marines
and army or navy.
> A few of our girls I know and respect very much in
NR are ex army,
> one in the navy yet and I believe another had been
to the middle east
> yet they are liberal at times in their views.
>
> Finally, if you go back to the forces, you won't be
facing or
> fighting mouthy hippy liberals; they'll be far more
conservative,
> tenacious and nastier with their words and actions
and far to the
> right of Atilla The Hun.
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Cornelius
Lentulus
> <cn_corn_lent@y...> wrote:
> >
> > Cn. Cornelius Lentulus M. Flavio Fidei salutem:
> >
> > I don't understand why do you want to leave us.
If you feel
> yourself Roman, as you' ve written many times, you
belong in the New
> Rome. If you would like to leave Nova Roma, I have
to ask the
> question whether you are indeed a devoted Roman
citizen. Do not care
> for other citizens' personal opinion: you are a
Nova Roman, a
> citizen of the Reborning Rome -- but if you leave
us, you won't be
> more... Please consider that!
> >
> > Cura ut valeas quam potest optime, Marce Flavi!
> >
> > CN CORN LENTVLVS
> >
> >
> > "M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@y...> ha
scritto: M.
> Lucretius Agricola M. Flavio Fidei s.p.d.
> >
> > I don't understand this at all. Sometimes I
don't agree with you,
> > sure, and sometimes your ideas are opposed,
sure, but you yourself
> > said you get some quiet support. Nowhere have I
seen scorn for
> you as
> > a person or a citizen.
> >
> > I personally would be pleased indeed were you
not to leave. I feel
> > there is room for all views on macronational
issues as long as we
> all
> > keep sight of our common interest in Romanitas.
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond
fuentes
> > <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > As A proud Roman & civi that is scorned by
most for my
> > > pro-western approach.I leave liberal NR &
return to
> > > the US ARMY as an officer.Congrats,youre rid
of me.
> > >
> > > S P Q R
> > >
> > > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> > >
> > > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > > Roman Citizen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Cnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
> > Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
> > Accensus Consulis Fr. Apuli Caesaris
> > Scriba Aedilis Curulis L. Iulii Sullae
> > Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae
Scholasticae Senior
> > Scriba Magistri Araneari Q. Cassi Calvi Iunior
> > Sodalis Sodalitatis Latinitatis
> > Latinista, Classicus Philologus
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39540 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve my friend Quintus Suetonius Paulinus who said in part

"they'll be far more conservative, tenacious and nastier with their words and actions and far to the right of Attila The Hun."

"Conservatism, a general state of mind that is averse to rapid change and innovation and strives for balance and order, while avoiding extremes."

The is NOTHING conservative about Islamofascists terrorists who kill without conscience men, women and child of all faiths to bring about
an Islamofascists state that would be hell on earth to most of the worlds people.

Please try and be reasonable on what you label conservative.

I have also asked Marcvs Flavivs Fides to stay but I have done so off list. Nova Roma is big enough for ALL viewpoints, even the ones I disagree with and too small for us to lose any of our citizens.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus







----- Original Message -----
From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)<mailto:mjk@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 8:48 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Farewell...


Salve M. Flavi Fide,

I think everyone here would rather see you stay in NR. I just wanted
to ask you how you think things would be different in the us army as
far as liberal and social attitudes are concerned? I see many of your
liberal American senators with serious clout, spouting off with views
totally contrary to yours on TV are all ex- marines and army or navy.
A few of our girls I know and respect very much in NR are ex army,
one in the navy yet and I believe another had been to the middle east
yet they are liberal at times in their views.

Finally, if you go back to the forces, you won't be facing or
fighting mouthy hippy liberals; they'll be far more conservative,
tenacious and nastier with their words and actions and far to the
right of Atilla The Hun.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
<cn_corn_lent@y...> wrote:
>
> Cn. Cornelius Lentulus M. Flavio Fidei salutem:
>
> I don't understand why do you want to leave us. If you feel
yourself Roman, as you' ve written many times, you belong in the New
Rome. If you would like to leave Nova Roma, I have to ask the
question whether you are indeed a devoted Roman citizen. Do not care
for other citizens' personal opinion: you are a Nova Roman, a
citizen of the Reborning Rome -- but if you leave us, you won't be
more... Please consider that!
>
> Cura ut valeas quam potest optime, Marce Flavi!
>
> CN CORN LENTVLVS
>
>
> "M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@y...> ha scritto: M.
Lucretius Agricola M. Flavio Fidei s.p.d.
>
> I don't understand this at all. Sometimes I don't agree with you,
> sure, and sometimes your ideas are opposed, sure, but you yourself
> said you get some quiet support. Nowhere have I seen scorn for
you as
> a person or a citizen.
>
> I personally would be pleased indeed were you not to leave. I feel
> there is room for all views on macronational issues as long as we
all
> keep sight of our common interest in Romanitas.
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
> <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> >
> > As A proud Roman & civi that is scorned by most for my
> > pro-western approach.I leave liberal NR & return to
> > the US ARMY as an officer.Congrats,youre rid of me.
> >
> > S P Q R
> >
> > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> >
> > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
> Cnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
> Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
> Accensus Consulis Fr. Apuli Caesaris
> Scriba Aedilis Curulis L. Iulii Sullae
> Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae Scholasticae Senior
> Scriba Magistri Araneari Q. Cassi Calvi Iunior
> Sodalis Sodalitatis Latinitatis
> Latinista, Classicus Philologus
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39541 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
A. Apollonius Francisco Apulo T. Octavio omnibus sal.

> > Maybe if we'ld continue the Certamen, we could
> publish a book with
> > all the tales written during the next years.
>
> Now that sounds like an idea! The rules of the
> contest states:
>
> "Nova Roma reserves the right to publish or
> broadcast the five best
> tales, in any medium or media, any number of times
> and at any stage in
> the future."
>
> So with each story being less than 3000 words, or 8
> pages, five entries
> each year means 40 pages a year. In 5 years, an
> anthology of some 200
> pages should be possible.

Yes, it's a nice idea. I have to say, though, next
year I'd like to see the word-limit a bit more
generous, maybe 5,000 words. I don't know about you,
but I found it very difficult to squeeze a story into
such a short space - my first draft was about 4,000
words and I lost some nice material cutting it down.
Did you find that problem?



___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Model Search 2005 - Find the next catwalk superstars - http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/model-search/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39542 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
I would never renounce NR, it is so much a part of
me.I will remain in touch and pay my taxes but I feel
my time in service is better spent in green not blue.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <wm_hogue@...>
wrote:
> M. Lucretius Agricola M. Flavio Fidei s.p.d.
>
> I don't understand this at all. Sometimes I don't
agree with you,
> sure, and sometimes your ideas are opposed, sure,
but you yourself
> said you get some quiet support. Nowhere have I seen
scorn for you as
> a person or a citizen.
>
> I personally would be pleased indeed were you not to
leave. I feel
> there is room for all views on macronational issues
as long as we all
> keep sight of our common interest in Romanitas.
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
> <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> >
> > As A proud Roman & civi that is scorned by most
for my
> > pro-western approach.I leave liberal NR & return
to
> > the US ARMY as an officer.Congrats,youre rid of
me.
> >
> > S P Q R
> >
> > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> >
> > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > Roman Citizen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home
page!
> > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
> >
>
>
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39543 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve M. Flavi Fide,

Well stick around with us anyway. Here you can defend your views all
you like and are not hampered by protocals or forced political
correctness as you are in the police. Another thing is that you and
the conserative right may well proved correct in time. Should the
west lose and fall eventually under the caliphates your situation as
a male will change little other than growing some stubble and
changing hat styles. You can then sit back (no alcohol), chew some
khat and grin sardonically watching the clamp down on libertarians,
pagans, the staunch femenists etc whilst thinking and saying I told
you so!

Sounds like you are having a difficult week. Sit back, put away a
hogs head of ale, or some spiced wine, clear your head and stick
around. Like they say in New York... fawget about it.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus








--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
>
> I fight a losing battle with the left everyday as a
> policeman and I am miserable doing it.I am more
> comfortable fighting amongst the right...I fear for
> the West
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mjk@d...>
> wrote:
> > Salve M. Flavi Fide,
> >
> > I think everyone here would rather see you stay in
> NR. I just wanted
> > to ask you how you think things would be different
> in the us army as
> > far as liberal and social attitudes are concerned? I
> see many of your
> > liberal American senators with serious clout,
> spouting off with views
> > totally contrary to yours on TV are all ex- marines
> and army or navy.
> > A few of our girls I know and respect very much in
> NR are ex army,
> > one in the navy yet and I believe another had been
> to the middle east
> > yet they are liberal at times in their views.
> >
> > Finally, if you go back to the forces, you won't be
> facing or
> > fighting mouthy hippy liberals; they'll be far more
> conservative,
> > tenacious and nastier with their words and actions
> and far to the
> > right of Atilla The Hun.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Cornelius
> Lentulus
> > <cn_corn_lent@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Cn. Cornelius Lentulus M. Flavio Fidei salutem:
> > >
> > > I don't understand why do you want to leave us.
> If you feel
> > yourself Roman, as you' ve written many times, you
> belong in the New
> > Rome. If you would like to leave Nova Roma, I have
> to ask the
> > question whether you are indeed a devoted Roman
> citizen. Do not care
> > for other citizens' personal opinion: you are a
> Nova Roman, a
> > citizen of the Reborning Rome -- but if you leave
> us, you won't be
> > more... Please consider that!
> > >
> > > Cura ut valeas quam potest optime, Marce Flavi!
> > >
> > > CN CORN LENTVLVS
> > >
> > >
> > > "M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@y...> ha
> scritto: M.
> > Lucretius Agricola M. Flavio Fidei s.p.d.
> > >
> > > I don't understand this at all. Sometimes I
> don't agree with you,
> > > sure, and sometimes your ideas are opposed,
> sure, but you yourself
> > > said you get some quiet support. Nowhere have I
> seen scorn for
> > you as
> > > a person or a citizen.
> > >
> > > I personally would be pleased indeed were you
> not to leave. I feel
> > > there is room for all views on macronational
> issues as long as we
> > all
> > > keep sight of our common interest in Romanitas.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond
> fuentes
> > > <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > As A proud Roman & civi that is scorned by
> most for my
> > > > pro-western approach.I leave liberal NR &
> return to
> > > > the US ARMY as an officer.Congrats,youre rid
> of me.
> > > >
> > > > S P Q R
> > > >
> > > > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> > > >
> > > > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > > > Roman Citizen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
> > > Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
> > > Accensus Consulis Fr. Apuli Caesaris
> > > Scriba Aedilis Curulis L. Iulii Sullae
> > > Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae
> Scholasticae Senior
> > > Scriba Magistri Araneari Q. Cassi Calvi Iunior
> > > Sodalis Sodalitatis Latinitatis
> > > Latinista, Classicus Philologus
> === Message Truncated ===
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
> http://farechase.yahoo.com
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39544 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Allah Ahkbar!

"The is NOTHING conservative about Islamofascists terrorists who kill
without conscience men, women and child of all faiths to bring about
> an Islamofascists state that would be hell on earth to most of the
worlds people."
>
My friend, you have the tongue of a serpent! By the beard of the
prophet, keep it wagging and I'll cut it out! -:


Peace be upon you,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Timothy P. Gallagher"
<spqr753@m...> wrote:
>
> Salve my friend Quintus Suetonius Paulinus who said in part
>
> "they'll be far more conservative, tenacious and nastier with their
words and actions and far to the right of Attila The Hun."
>
> "Conservatism, a general state of mind that is averse to rapid
change and innovation and strives for balance and order, while
avoiding extremes."
>
> The is NOTHING conservative about Islamofascists terrorists who
kill without conscience men, women and child of all faiths to bring
about
> an Islamofascists state that would be hell on earth to most of the
worlds people.
>
> Please try and be reasonable on what you label conservative.
>
> I have also asked Marcvs Flavivs Fides to stay but I have done so
off list. Nova Roma is big enough for ALL viewpoints, even the ones I
disagree with and too small for us to lose any of our citizens.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)<mailto:mjk@d...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 8:48 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Farewell...
>
>
> Salve M. Flavi Fide,
>
> I think everyone here would rather see you stay in NR. I just
wanted
> to ask you how you think things would be different in the us army
as
> far as liberal and social attitudes are concerned? I see many of
your
> liberal American senators with serious clout, spouting off with
views
> totally contrary to yours on TV are all ex- marines and army or
navy.
> A few of our girls I know and respect very much in NR are ex
army,
> one in the navy yet and I believe another had been to the middle
east
> yet they are liberal at times in their views.
>
> Finally, if you go back to the forces, you won't be facing or
> fighting mouthy hippy liberals; they'll be far more conservative,
> tenacious and nastier with their words and actions and far to the
> right of Atilla The Hun.
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
> <cn_corn_lent@y...> wrote:
> >
> > Cn. Cornelius Lentulus M. Flavio Fidei salutem:
> >
> > I don't understand why do you want to leave us. If you feel
> yourself Roman, as you' ve written many times, you belong in the
New
> Rome. If you would like to leave Nova Roma, I have to ask the
> question whether you are indeed a devoted Roman citizen. Do not
care
> for other citizens' personal opinion: you are a Nova Roman, a
> citizen of the Reborning Rome -- but if you leave us, you won't
be
> more... Please consider that!
> >
> > Cura ut valeas quam potest optime, Marce Flavi!
> >
> > CN CORN LENTVLVS
> >
> >
> > "M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@y...> ha scritto:
M.
> Lucretius Agricola M. Flavio Fidei s.p.d.
> >
> > I don't understand this at all. Sometimes I don't agree with
you,
> > sure, and sometimes your ideas are opposed, sure, but you
yourself
> > said you get some quiet support. Nowhere have I seen scorn
for
> you as
> > a person or a citizen.
> >
> > I personally would be pleased indeed were you not to leave. I
feel
> > there is room for all views on macronational issues as long
as we
> all
> > keep sight of our common interest in Romanitas.
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
> > <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > As A proud Roman & civi that is scorned by most for my
> > > pro-western approach.I leave liberal NR & return to
> > > the US ARMY as an officer.Congrats,youre rid of me.
> > >
> > > S P Q R
> > >
> > > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> > >
> > > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > > Roman Citizen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Cnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
> > Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
> > Accensus Consulis Fr. Apuli Caesaris
> > Scriba Aedilis Curulis L. Iulii Sullae
> > Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae Scholasticae Senior
> > Scriba Magistri Araneari Q. Cassi Calvi Iunior
> > Sodalis Sodalitatis Latinitatis
> > Latinista, Classicus Philologus
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-
Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-
unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39545 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve Quintus Suetonius Paulinus

Funny very funny. : ) Unless they win. : (


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)<mailto:mjk@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 10:05 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Farewell...


Allah Ahkbar!

"The is NOTHING conservative about Islamofascists terrorists who kill
without conscience men, women and child of all faiths to bring about
> an Islamofascists state that would be hell on earth to most of the
worlds people."
>
My friend, you have the tongue of a serpent! By the beard of the
prophet, keep it wagging and I'll cut it out! -:


Peace be upon you,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Timothy P. Gallagher"
<spqr753@m...> wrote:
>
> Salve my friend Quintus Suetonius Paulinus who said in part
>
> "they'll be far more conservative, tenacious and nastier with their
words and actions and far to the right of Attila The Hun."
>
> "Conservatism, a general state of mind that is averse to rapid
change and innovation and strives for balance and order, while
avoiding extremes."
>
> The is NOTHING conservative about Islamofascists terrorists who
kill without conscience men, women and child of all faiths to bring
about
> an Islamofascists state that would be hell on earth to most of the
worlds people.
>
> Please try and be reasonable on what you label conservative.
>
> I have also asked Marcvs Flavivs Fides to stay but I have done so
off list. Nova Roma is big enough for ALL viewpoints, even the ones I
disagree with and too small for us to lose any of our citizens.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)<mailto:mjk@d...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 8:48 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Farewell...
>
>
> Salve M. Flavi Fide,
>
> I think everyone here would rather see you stay in NR. I just
wanted
> to ask you how you think things would be different in the us army
as
> far as liberal and social attitudes are concerned? I see many of
your
> liberal American senators with serious clout, spouting off with
views
> totally contrary to yours on TV are all ex- marines and army or
navy.
> A few of our girls I know and respect very much in NR are ex
army,
> one in the navy yet and I believe another had been to the middle
east
> yet they are liberal at times in their views.
>
> Finally, if you go back to the forces, you won't be facing or
> fighting mouthy hippy liberals; they'll be far more conservative,
> tenacious and nastier with their words and actions and far to the
> right of Atilla The Hun.
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
> <cn_corn_lent@y...> wrote:
> >
> > Cn. Cornelius Lentulus M. Flavio Fidei salutem:
> >
> > I don't understand why do you want to leave us. If you feel
> yourself Roman, as you' ve written many times, you belong in the
New
> Rome. If you would like to leave Nova Roma, I have to ask the
> question whether you are indeed a devoted Roman citizen. Do not
care
> for other citizens' personal opinion: you are a Nova Roman, a
> citizen of the Reborning Rome -- but if you leave us, you won't
be
> more... Please consider that!
> >
> > Cura ut valeas quam potest optime, Marce Flavi!
> >
> > CN CORN LENTVLVS
> >
> >
> > "M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@y...> ha scritto:
M.
> Lucretius Agricola M. Flavio Fidei s.p.d.
> >
> > I don't understand this at all. Sometimes I don't agree with
you,
> > sure, and sometimes your ideas are opposed, sure, but you
yourself
> > said you get some quiet support. Nowhere have I seen scorn
for
> you as
> > a person or a citizen.
> >
> > I personally would be pleased indeed were you not to leave. I
feel
> > there is room for all views on macronational issues as long
as we
> all
> > keep sight of our common interest in Romanitas.
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
> > <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > As A proud Roman & civi that is scorned by most for my
> > > pro-western approach.I leave liberal NR & return to
> > > the US ARMY as an officer.Congrats,youre rid of me.
> > >
> > > S P Q R
> > >
> > > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> > >
> > > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > > Roman Citizen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Cnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
> > Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
> > Accensus Consulis Fr. Apuli Caesaris
> > Scriba Aedilis Curulis L. Iulii Sullae
> > Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae Scholasticae Senior
> > Scriba Magistri Araneari Q. Cassi Calvi Iunior
> > Sodalis Sodalitatis Latinitatis
> > Latinista, Classicus Philologus
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-
Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>>" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-
unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>>.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ> Fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA> The fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ>
Roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39546 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:10:48AM -0800, raymond fuentes wrote:
> I fight a losing battle with the left everyday as a
> policeman and I am miserable doing it.I am more
> comfortable fighting amongst the right...I fear for
> the West

Ah, still here despite the grand announcement. Great.

The rest of the NYPD would be _amazed_ to hear that their job consists
of "fighting... the left"; in fact, I think they would say that your job
is to *protect* *the* *public*. Whether that public is right, left,
center, or a continuous spiral arranged in a Witch of Agnesi. If you
have abandoned your duty to the extent of "fighting the left" while
you're getting paid to protect all, then your concept of duty needs
revisiting.


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Melius frangi quam flecti.
It is better to break than to bend.
-- N/A
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39547 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salvete, omnes -

On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 07:44:40AM -0500, Sensei Phil Perez wrote:
> Salvete omnes,
>
> A real Roman departs our midst to do what real Romans have always
> done: To fight Barbarians! The rest of us can continue to sit here in
> the forum and talk all the nonsense we want. Our rights to do so
> protected by young men like Flavius. Yes, even those of us who do not
> live in the USA.

Amice, weren't you the one who said "can we please get back to
discussing Roma", or something of the sort? Repeatedly, in fact?
However, since you bring it up: I disagree with you. Completely. Flavius
has gone off to protect the interests of Big Oil, the private political
grudges of Bush and Co. When I was in the US Army, I was proud to serve
the United States; today, I would be ashamed and I would feel that my
effort and sacrifice were going to serve dishonorable ends.

Neither Bush nor any of his cronies have served in combat - and yet,
they scream for young men to serve their ends and die for them. I find
their endless lies to be nothing more than filthy distortions, designed
to do nothing more than stir up hate. The fact that they are wildly
successful - that over TWO THOUSAND of our men have died in a sand pit
into which those lies have lured them - should be a wakeup call to
everyone, not just here in the US but all over the world.

Bush lied about Iraq's involvement with the events of 9/11.
He lied about Saddam's ties with the religious fanatics.
He lied about the later intelligence he got about Iraq.
He lied about Iraqi oil paying for this war.
He lied about WMDs.
He lied about terrorism statistics (terrorism has risen sharply in the
recent years.)
He lied about his military record.
He lied about not being arrested.
He lied about funding schools.
He lied about Social Security.
He lied about tax cuts.
He lied about the AIDS funding his administration is providing.
He lied about not knowing how intense Katrina was when it approached NO.

He has not stopped lying from day one:
http://www.bushwatch.net/bushlies.htm

His lies have cost us thousands of American lives, they have cost us the
financial future of our descendants, and they continue to bleed us white
every day.

The top supporter of the military and of our veterans' interests,
Congressman John Murtha, has called for immediate withdrawal as the only
sane policy from this point forward - and the Bush machine has
immediately gone into overdrive to discredit and dishonor this Vietnam
veteran who fought with distinction.

I consider Bush and his entire political machine to be vile murderers.
I've never tied myself to any political party, but these days, the
Republicans are completely anathema to me for their support of him and
his policies of religious fanaticism-driven mass murders.

> What he goes to fight will endanger us all sooner or
> later if not stopped in its tracks. The USA has drawn a line in the
> sand so it won't have to be drawn in our streets.

It's a line drawn only in their own minds. I served in the US Army's
Military Intelligence branch, and I assure you that this country is
completely porous to any threat that any terrorist would care to
perpetrate on it; we have spent the money that could have gone to
*real*, in-depth defense on "security theater", on creating a show that
will calm the populace by its appearance but has provided no benefit
(and a large detriment by consuming the resources that could have been
used properly.)

> May the gods of Rome
> protect him as well as the Supreme Being he may believe in.

May the Gods of Rome, and any other force that can be brought to bear,
protect him in his misdirected effort. May they protect his life, and
may they help him to discover some small measure of honor in the
completely dishonorable endeavor in which he is now entangled.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Quidquid id est, timeo Danaos et dona ferentes.
Whatever this may be, I fear the Greeks even when they're bringing gifts.
-- Vergil, "Aenis. The priest Laokoon's warning when seeing the Trojan horse."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39548 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
I fight for the young idealistic infantryman and o311s
I might be able to help...not for the cause but for
the men who need experienced leaders.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <ben@...>
wrote:
> Salvete, omnes -
>
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 07:44:40AM -0500, Sensei
Phil Perez wrote:
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > A real Roman departs our midst to do what real
Romans have always
> > done: To fight Barbarians! The rest of us can
continue to sit here in
> > the forum and talk all the nonsense we want. Our
rights to do so
> > protected by young men like Flavius. Yes, even
those of us who do not
> > live in the USA.
>
> Amice, weren't you the one who said "can we please
get back to
> discussing Roma", or something of the sort?
Repeatedly, in fact?
> However, since you bring it up: I disagree with you.
Completely. Flavius
> has gone off to protect the interests of Big Oil,
the private political
> grudges of Bush and Co. When I was in the US Army,
I was proud to serve
> the United States; today, I would be ashamed and I
would feel that my
> effort and sacrifice were going to serve
dishonorable ends.
>
> Neither Bush nor any of his cronies have served in
combat - and yet,
> they scream for young men to serve their ends and
die for them. I find
> their endless lies to be nothing more than filthy
distortions, designed
> to do nothing more than stir up hate. The fact that
they are wildly
> successful - that over TWO THOUSAND of our men have
died in a sand pit
> into which those lies have lured them - should be a
wakeup call to
> everyone, not just here in the US but all over the
world.
>
> Bush lied about Iraq's involvement with the events
of 9/11.
> He lied about Saddam's ties with the religious
fanatics.
> He lied about the later intelligence he got about
Iraq.
> He lied about Iraqi oil paying for this war.
> He lied about WMDs.
> He lied about terrorism statistics (terrorism has
risen sharply in the
> recent years.)
> He lied about his military record.
> He lied about not being arrested.
> He lied about funding schools.
> He lied about Social Security.
> He lied about tax cuts.
> He lied about the AIDS funding his administration is
providing.
> He lied about not knowing how intense Katrina was
when it approached NO.
>
> He has not stopped lying from day one:
> http://www.bushwatch.net/bushlies.htm
>
> His lies have cost us thousands of American lives,
they have cost us the
> financial future of our descendants, and they
continue to bleed us white
> every day.
>
> The top supporter of the military and of our
veterans' interests,
> Congressman John Murtha, has called for immediate
withdrawal as the only
> sane policy from this point forward - and the Bush
machine has
> immediately gone into overdrive to discredit and
dishonor this Vietnam
> veteran who fought with distinction.
>
> I consider Bush and his entire political machine to
be vile murderers.
> I've never tied myself to any political party, but
these days, the
> Republicans are completely anathema to me for their
support of him and
> his policies of religious fanaticism-driven mass
murders.
>
> > What he goes to fight will endanger us all sooner
or
> > later if not stopped in its tracks. The USA has
drawn a line in the
> > sand so it won't have to be drawn in our streets.
>
> It's a line drawn only in their own minds. I served
in the US Army's
> Military Intelligence branch, and I assure you that
this country is
> completely porous to any threat that any terrorist
would care to
> perpetrate on it; we have spent the money that could
have gone to
> *real*, in-depth defense on "security theater", on
creating a show that
> will calm the populace by its appearance but has
provided no benefit
> (and a large detriment by consuming the resources
that could have been
> used properly.)
>
> > May the gods of Rome
> > protect him as well as the Supreme Being he may
believe in.
>
> May the Gods of Rome, and any other force that can
be brought to bear,
> protect him in his misdirected effort. May they
protect his life, and
> may they help him to discover some small measure of
honor in the
> completely dishonorable endeavor in which he is now
entangled.
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39549 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Im not resigning.Im just putting my boots back on the
ground instead of my mouth.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mjk@...>
wrote:
> Salve M. Flavi Fide,
>
> Well stick around with us anyway. Here you can
defend your views all
> you like and are not hampered by protocals or forced
political
> correctness as you are in the police. Another thing
is that you and
> the conserative right may well proved correct in
time. Should the
> west lose and fall eventually under the caliphates
your situation as
> a male will change little other than growing some
stubble and
> changing hat styles. You can then sit back (no
alcohol), chew some
> khat and grin sardonically watching the clamp down
on libertarians,
> pagans, the staunch femenists etc whilst thinking
and saying I told
> you so!
>
> Sounds like you are having a difficult week. Sit
back, put away a
> hogs head of ale, or some spiced wine, clear your
head and stick
> around. Like they say in New York... fawget about
it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
> <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> >
> > I fight a losing battle with the left everyday as
a
> > policeman and I am miserable doing it.I am more
> > comfortable fighting amongst the right...I fear
for
> > the West
> > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mjk@d...>
> > wrote:
> > > Salve M. Flavi Fide,
> > >
> > > I think everyone here would rather see you stay
in
> > NR. I just wanted
> > > to ask you how you think things would be
different
> > in the us army as
> > > far as liberal and social attitudes are
concerned? I
> > see many of your
> > > liberal American senators with serious clout,
> > spouting off with views
> > > totally contrary to yours on TV are all ex-
marines
> > and army or navy.
> > > A few of our girls I know and respect very much
in
> > NR are ex army,
> > > one in the navy yet and I believe another had
been
> > to the middle east
> > > yet they are liberal at times in their views.
> > >
> > > Finally, if you go back to the forces, you won't
be
> > facing or
> > > fighting mouthy hippy liberals; they'll be far
more
> > conservative,
> > > tenacious and nastier with their words and
actions
> > and far to the
> > > right of Atilla The Hun.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus
Cornelius
> > Lentulus
> > > <cn_corn_lent@y...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Cn. Cornelius Lentulus M. Flavio Fidei
salutem:
> > > >
> > > > I don't understand why do you want to leave
us.
> > If you feel
> > > yourself Roman, as you' ve written many times,
you
> > belong in the New
> > > Rome. If you would like to leave Nova Roma, I
have
> > to ask the
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39550 From: Peter Bird Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve, Marce Flavi Fides!

If you're unhappy in your present situation, you're doing the right thing!
But stay with Nova Roma! I always enjoy your pithy, common-sense,
down-to-earth comments and would miss them if they stopped arriving. And I
write as the son of a policeman who died in the line of duty.

Take care and vale optime.

S Pontius Pilatus Barbatus



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of raymond fuentes
Sent: 19 November 2005 14:11
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Farewell...



I fight a losing battle with the left everyday as a
policeman and I am miserable doing it.I am more
comfortable fighting amongst the right...I fear for
the West
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mjk@...>
wrote:
> Salve M. Flavi Fide,
>
> I think everyone here would rather see you stay in
NR. I just wanted
> to ask you how you think things would be different
in the us army as
> far as liberal and social attitudes are concerned? I
see many of your
> liberal American senators with serious clout,
spouting off with views
> totally contrary to yours on TV are all ex- marines
and army or navy.
> A few of our girls I know and respect very much in
NR are ex army,
> one in the navy yet and I believe another had been
to the middle east
> yet they are liberal at times in their views.
>
> Finally, if you go back to the forces, you won't be
facing or
> fighting mouthy hippy liberals; they'll be far more
conservative,
> tenacious and nastier with their words and actions
and far to the
> right of Atilla The Hun.
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Cornelius
Lentulus
> <cn_corn_lent@y...> wrote:
> >
> > Cn. Cornelius Lentulus M. Flavio Fidei salutem:
> >
> > I don't understand why do you want to leave us.
If you feel
> yourself Roman, as you' ve written many times, you
belong in the New
> Rome. If you would like to leave Nova Roma, I have
to ask the
> question whether you are indeed a devoted Roman
citizen. Do not care
> for other citizens' personal opinion: you are a
Nova Roman, a
> citizen of the Reborning Rome -- but if you leave
us, you won't be
> more... Please consider that!
> >
> > Cura ut valeas quam potest optime, Marce Flavi!
> >
> > CN CORN LENTVLVS
> >
> >
> > "M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@y...> ha
scritto: M.
> Lucretius Agricola M. Flavio Fidei s.p.d.
> >
> > I don't understand this at all. Sometimes I
don't agree with you,
> > sure, and sometimes your ideas are opposed,
sure, but you yourself
> > said you get some quiet support. Nowhere have I
seen scorn for
> you as
> > a person or a citizen.
> >
> > I personally would be pleased indeed were you
not to leave. I feel
> > there is room for all views on macronational
issues as long as we
> all
> > keep sight of our common interest in Romanitas.
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond
fuentes
> > <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > As A proud Roman & civi that is scorned by
most for my
> > > pro-western approach.I leave liberal NR &
return to
> > > the US ARMY as an officer.Congrats,youre rid
of me.
> > >
> > > S P Q R
> > >
> > > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> > >
> > > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > > Roman Citizen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Cnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
> > Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
> > Accensus Consulis Fr. Apuli Caesaris
> > Scriba Aedilis Curulis L. Iulii Sullae
> > Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae
Scholasticae Senior
> > Scriba Magistri Araneari Q. Cassi Calvi Iunior
> > Sodalis Sodalitatis Latinitatis
> > Latinista, Classicus Philologus
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com



_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39551 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve,

I really hope you're not implying that those of use who have served and
didn't have to go into combat are somehow worthless.

Vale,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia

----- Original Message -----
From: "Benjamin A. Okopnik" <ben@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Farewell...


> Neither Bush nor any of his cronies have served in combat - and yet,
> they scream for young men to serve their ends and die for them.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39552 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
No.Absolutely not.Combat is nothing to glorify.YOU
raised your right hand,you have my respect.Besides,
Ive been a fan of yours since youve first scolded me.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <annia@...>
wrote:
> Salve,
>
> I really hope you're not implying that those of use
who have served and
> didn't have to go into combat are somehow worthless.
>
> Vale,
>
> Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Benjamin A. Okopnik" <ben@...>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 10:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Farewell...
>
>
> > Neither Bush nor any of his cronies have served in
combat - and yet,
> > they scream for young men to serve their ends and
die for them.
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39553 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve,

On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 11:38:05AM -0500, annia@... wrote:
> Salve,
>
> I really hope you're not implying that those of use who have served and
> didn't have to go into combat are somehow worthless.

Please show me where you have seen me say or imply that. If you can, I
will certainly apologize for the misperception that my words would have
fostered.

Should I quote the endless battles and wars in which the soldiers have
served honorably while serving the insane, idiotic, or misdirected ends
for which their leaders were striving? Or can you think of a few - or a
few dozen - yourself?

Soldiers do the job on the ground; they do not get to make the
high-level decisions that put them into a given combat theater. If you
have mistaken my denunciation of the politicians who have placed our
soldiers in a death pit from vile motives with the actions of the
soldiers themselves within that pit, then you have misunderstood what I
have written, and I apologize for not having been clear enough.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Docendo discimus.
We learn by teaching.
(After Seneca Philosophus, "homines dum docent discunt" - men learn while they
teach.)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39554 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
When I do depart it will not be for good, I imagine my
posts might become less frequent.I love NR & sometimes
my tongue slips but Im full of love not hatred.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <p.bird@...>
wrote:
> Salve, Marce Flavi Fides!
>
> If you're unhappy in your present situation, you're
doing the right thing!
> But stay with Nova Roma! I always enjoy your pithy,
common-sense,
> down-to-earth comments and would miss them if they
stopped arriving. And I
> write as the son of a policeman who died in the line
of duty.
>
> Take care and vale optime.
>
> S Pontius Pilatus Barbatus
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of raymond fuentes
> Sent: 19 November 2005 14:11
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Farewell...
>
>
>
> I fight a losing battle with the left everyday as a
> policeman and I am miserable doing it.I am more
> comfortable fighting amongst the right...I fear for
> the West
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mjk@...>
> wrote:
> > Salve M. Flavi Fide,
> >
> > I think everyone here would rather see you stay in
> NR. I just wanted
> > to ask you how you think things would be different
> in the us army as
> > far as liberal and social attitudes are concerned?
I
> see many of your
> > liberal American senators with serious clout,
> spouting off with views
> > totally contrary to yours on TV are all ex-
marines
> and army or navy.
> > A few of our girls I know and respect very much in
> NR are ex army,
> > one in the navy yet and I believe another had been
> to the middle east
> > yet they are liberal at times in their views.
> >
> > Finally, if you go back to the forces, you won't
be
> facing or
> > fighting mouthy hippy liberals; they'll be far
more
> conservative,
> > tenacious and nastier with their words and actions
> and far to the
> > right of Atilla The Hun.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Cornelius
> Lentulus
> > <cn_corn_lent@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Cn. Cornelius Lentulus M. Flavio Fidei salutem:
> > >
> > > I don't understand why do you want to leave
us.
> If you feel
> > yourself Roman, as you' ve written many times,
you
> belong in the New
> > Rome. If you would like to leave Nova Roma, I
have
> to ask the
> > question whether you are indeed a devoted Roman
> citizen. Do not care
> > for other citizens' personal opinion: you are a
> Nova Roman, a
> > citizen of the Reborning Rome -- but if you leave
> us, you won't be
> > more... Please consider that!
> > >
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39555 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve,

I think it's because you faulted the president for not having been in
combat, which actually isn't a fault. I've never been in combat either, but
I served faithfully for 3 years, and I'm planning to go back in after
college. If I never see combat, I will consider it a good thing, not
something that I should be faulted for if I ever go into political office.

Vale,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia

----- Original Message -----
From: "Benjamin A. Okopnik" <ben@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Farewell...

> Please show me where you have seen me say or imply that. If you can, I
> will certainly apologize for the misperception that my words would have
> fostered.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39556 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Oh, and to address the _other_ point here directly:

On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 11:38:05AM -0500, annia@... wrote:
> Salve,
>
> I really hope you're not implying that those of use who have served and
> didn't have to go into combat are somehow worthless.

Unless you're a high-level politician screaming for others to spill
their blood for you, your non-combat service is not an issue - is, in
fact, completely unrelated to anything I've said here.

The "war hawks" in the government are almost exclusively non-combatants;
those who oppose them on the issue of the war are largely combat
veterans, most of them decorated.

Feel free to tell me who has more right to make decisions involving
going into combat, in your opinion. Mine is certainly made up.

http://takeittokarl.blogspot.com/2005/07/army-and-marine-vet-draw-your-own.html


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Docendo discimus.
We learn by teaching.
(After Seneca Philosophus, "homines dum docent discunt" - men learn while they
teach.)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39557 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
On 11/19/05, Benjamin A. Okopnik <ben@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete, omnes -
>
> Bush lied about Iraq's involvement with the events of 9/11.
> He lied about Saddam's ties with the religious fanatics.
> He lied about the later intelligence he got about Iraq.
> He lied about Iraqi oil paying for this war.
> He lied about WMDs.
> He lied about terrorism statistics (terrorism has risen sharply in the
> recent years.)
> He lied about his military record.
> He lied about not being arrested.
> He lied about funding schools.
> He lied about Social Security.
> He lied about tax cuts.
> He lied about the AIDS funding his administration is providing.
> He lied about not knowing how intense Katrina was when it approached NO.

And he and Blair both lied about the use of chemical weapons in Iraq
Flavia Lucilla Merula

--
> Chaos, confusion, disorder - my work here is done


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39558 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve,

On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 12:25:57PM -0500, annia@... wrote:
> Salve,
>
> I think it's because you faulted the president for not having been in
> combat, which actually isn't a fault. I've never been in combat either, but
> I served faithfully for 3 years, and I'm planning to go back in after
> college. If I never see combat, I will consider it a good thing, not
> something that I should be faulted for if I ever go into political office.

I fault him and his group of war hawks for sending men and women into
combat for his own ends; for spouting endless lies that lead to their
senseless deaths.

If his stance on the military situation had been "since I know nothing
about military service - let me consult with those who do" - and Colin
Powell's opposition to going into this senseless war is well known -
then his lack of combat experience would be meaningless. As it is, he
took the decision away from those who could have made it with knowledge
and understanding, and our people are dying in a country which was never
a threat to us for his petty personal hatreds and his desire for money.

I don't despise George Bush for not having been in combat. I have made
my reasons explicit here; one of them is simply his lack of
*qualifications* for making the decisions which are now resulting in
deaths of thousands, and are creating terrorists by the planeload by
providing them with the finest combat training in the world. I despise
him for the fact that my children will be reaping what he has sown. I
despise him for his inability to create a coherent policy, or even a
coherent sentence. His lack of combat experience is only a single factor
in his inability to set that policy - and it's one that matters to a
large degree at this moment.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Duo cum faciunt idem, non est idem.
When two do the same thing, it isn't the same (i.e. one can get away with doing
something while another cannot).
-- Terence, "Adelphoe". Cf. "quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39559 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
The FACT is not LEFT or RIGHT . We are there.Let our
soldiers and Marines fight.Being handcuffed as a cop
by PC rules is bad.In a war its INSANITY.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <ben@...>
wrote:
> Salve,
>
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 12:25:57PM -0500,
annia@... wrote:
> > Salve,
> >
> > I think it's because you faulted the president for
not having been in
> > combat, which actually isn't a fault. I've never
been in combat either, but
> > I served faithfully for 3 years, and I'm planning
to go back in after
> > college. If I never see combat, I will consider it
a good thing, not
> > something that I should be faulted for if I ever
go into political office.
>
> I fault him and his group of war hawks for sending
men and women into
> combat for his own ends; for spouting endless lies
that lead to their
> senseless deaths.
>
> If his stance on the military situation had been
"since I know nothing
> about military service - let me consult with those
who do" - and Colin
> Powell's opposition to going into this senseless war
is well known -
> then his lack of combat experience would be
meaningless. As it is, he
> took the decision away from those who could have
made it with knowledge
> and understanding, and our people are dying in a
country which was never
> a threat to us for his petty personal hatreds and
his desire for money.
>
> I don't despise George Bush for not having been in
combat. I have made
> my reasons explicit here; one of them is simply his
lack of
> *qualifications* for making the decisions which are
now resulting in
> deaths of thousands, and are creating terrorists by
the planeload by
> providing them with the finest combat training in
the world. I despise
> him for the fact that my children will be reaping
what he has sown. I
> despise him for his inability to create a coherent
policy, or even a
> coherent sentence. His lack of combat experience is
only a single factor
> in his inability to set that policy - and it's one
that matters to a
> large degree at this moment.
>
>
> Vale,
> Caius Minucius Scaevola
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Duo cum faciunt idem, non est idem.
> When two do the same thing, it isn't the same (i.e.
one can get away with doing
> something while another cannot).
> -- Terence, "Adelphoe". Cf. "quod licet Iovi, non
licet bovi."


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39560 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 09:56:01AM -0800, raymond fuentes wrote:
> The FACT is not LEFT or RIGHT . We are there.Let our
> soldiers and Marines fight.Being handcuffed as a cop
> by PC rules is bad.In a war its INSANITY.

I agree: throwing our soldiers into combat without good intelligence
*is* insanity. Report from a man who trains our interrogators and
*gathers* the necessary intelligence:

http://www.livejournal.com/users/pecunium/151529.html


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Exitus acta probat.
The result validates the deeds.
-- Ovid, "Heroides. Cf. finis coronat opus."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39561 From: A.M. Nelson Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve,

No good leader is worthless.

There are, however, somethings that can not be taught via training alone. Those experiences and skills, well they are needed. They are needed now.

Vale,

Gaia Iulia Felix



----- Original Message -----
From: annia@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Farewell...


Salve,

I really hope you're not implying that those of use who have served and
didn't have to go into combat are somehow worthless.

Vale,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia

----- Original Message -----
From: "Benjamin A. Okopnik" <ben@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Farewell...


> Neither Bush nor any of his cronies have served in combat - and yet,
> they scream for young men to serve their ends and die for them.




SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
Roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39562 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve Scaveoli, et salvete omnes

As many posts have been presented recently lamenting the number of messages having to do with present-day internal US politics I feel I must, in good conscience, take a stand here as I have in the macroworld. To those citizens who have no interest in US politics, I beg pardon and invite you to pass this message by. To all others, read on if you will:

I go on record as agreeing with everything said in the orginal post by Scaveola; many people dance around the truth of the matter, but this is one post I feel has hit the mark squarely. I have posted my own views at various times, and not only in this forum, and I believe each and every time I have made my postion as clear as my fellow citizen here. I have no love for this administration; I feel it is made up of cowards and political opportunists out to gather as much power and money for themselves as they can before their term expires or they are hounded out of office. They lied to us to get us into a war they had no idea how to prosecute, and now they are lying to save themselves. Notice the current round of indictments and investigation going on in Washington- they aren't happening for no reason. Blood is in the water in Washington, and it's only going to get worse as the truth comes out.

For those in search of yet another source for the truth, I invite you to http://www.antiwar.com

Perhaps in ancient Rome things might have gone differently, with those in power able to dupe their citizens as to the real reasons for war or pacify them with a series of Games. It doesn't work that way in today's world- the common man is able to inform himself on world events and form his own conclusions, and figure out what to do when he finds out he's been led down a garden path to hell. Et tu, Brute?

Perhaps if Dubya hadn't been such a loser in his earlier days he wouldn't feel the need to drag an entire nation- nay, an entire world- into his own little fantasy world of self-destruction.

============================================================
From: "Benjamin A. Okopnik" <ben@...>
Date: 2005/11/19 Sat AM 09:49:48 CST
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Farewell...

============================================================
Neither Bush nor any of his cronies have served in combat - and yet,
they scream for young men to serve their ends and die for them. I find
their endless lies to be nothing more than filthy distortions, designed
to do nothing more than stir up hate. The fact that they are wildly
successful - that over TWO THOUSAND of our men have died in a sand pit
into which those lies have lured them - should be a wakeup call to
everyone, not just here in the US but all over the world.

Bush lied about Iraq's involvement with the events of 9/11.
He lied about Saddam's ties with the religious fanatics.
He lied about the later intelligence he got about Iraq.
He lied about Iraqi oil paying for this war.
He lied about WMDs.
He lied about terrorism statistics (terrorism has risen sharply in the
recent years.)
He lied about his military record.
He lied about not being arrested.
He lied about funding schools.
He lied about Social Security.
He lied about tax cuts.
He lied about the AIDS funding his administration is providing.
He lied about not knowing how intense Katrina was when it approached NO.

He has not stopped lying from day one:
http://www.bushwatch.net/bushlies.htm

His lies have cost us thousands of American lives, they have cost us the
financial future of our descendants, and they continue to bleed us white
every day.

The top supporter of the military and of our veterans' interests,
Congressman John Murtha, has called for immediate withdrawal as the only
sane policy from this point forward - and the Bush machine has
immediately gone into overdrive to discredit and dishonor this Vietnam
veteran who fought with distinction.

I consider Bush and his entire political machine to be vile murderers.
I've never tied myself to any political party, but these days, the
Republicans are completely anathema to me for their support of him and
his policies of religious fanaticism-driven mass murders.

> What he goes to fight will endanger us all sooner or
> later if not stopped in its tracks. The USA has drawn a line in the
> sand so it won't have to be drawn in our streets.

It's a line drawn only in their own minds. I served in the US Army's
Military Intelligence branch, and I assure you that this country is
completely porous to any threat that any terrorist would care to
perpetrate on it; we have spent the money that could have gone to
*real*, in-depth defense on "security theater", on creating a show that
will calm the populace by its appearance but has provided no benefit
(and a large detriment by consuming the resources that could have been
used properly.)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39563 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
yea Gods, we agree on something? Is there hope in the
world?
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <ben@...>
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 09:56:01AM -0800, raymond
fuentes wrote:
> > The FACT is not LEFT or RIGHT . We are there.Let
our
> > soldiers and Marines fight.Being handcuffed as a
cop
> > by PC rules is bad.In a war its INSANITY.
>
> I agree: throwing our soldiers into combat without
good intelligence
> *is* insanity. Report from a man who trains our
interrogators and
> *gathers* the necessary intelligence:
>
>
http://www.livejournal.com/users/pecunium/151529.html
>
>
> Caius Minucius Scaevola
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Exitus acta probat.
> The result validates the deeds.
> -- Ovid, "Heroides. Cf. finis coronat opus."


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39564 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve,

I believe the charge is directed at those who use their influnce to ENSURE they never have to see combat. Today's Iraq is yesterday's Vietnam- if Dubya is now so gung-ho about sending people off to war, why wasn't he so gung-ho to go to war when it was HIS head on the chopping block? He was a fighter pilot, wasn't he? I've heard fighter pilots are supposed to be aggressive and spoiling for a fight, knowing they are the best and will not be defeated- or maybe he just didn't measure up and was scared to face the enemy face-to-face?

No, I served for 12 years between the Marine Corps and the Army- I missed out on Grenada, Beirut, Panama, and Gulf War 1. The only semblance of combat I saw my entire time was very small unit actions in the Philippines back in the mid-80's (I was in the Marines then), chasing down rebels in the hills. It's not fun being under fire, I guarantee you, but when duty calls it's time to step up to the plate and get the job done. It's not time to call Daddy to get you reassigned.

I applaud each and every service member- of every nation- who serves with honor and self-sacrifice for his people, whether they ever see combat or not. Those who wear their country's uniform for personal gain are simply contemptible. I have more respect for a brave enemy than a coward on my own side.
============================================================
From: <annia@...>
Date: 2005/11/19 Sat AM 10:38:05 CST
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Farewell...

============================================================
Salve,

I really hope you're not implying that those of use who have served and
didn't have to go into combat are somehow worthless.

Vale,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39565 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 01:17:45PM -0500, Benjamin Okopnik wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 09:56:01AM -0800, raymond fuentes wrote:
> > The FACT is not LEFT or RIGHT . We are there.Let our
> > soldiers and Marines fight.Being handcuffed as a cop
> > by PC rules is bad.In a war its INSANITY.
>
> I agree: throwing our soldiers into combat without good intelligence
> *is* insanity. Report from a man who trains our interrogators and
> *gathers* the necessary intelligence:
>
> http://www.livejournal.com/users/pecunium/151529.html

And, to quote this _professional military interrogator_, for those who
would try to cover up for Bush and his criminal policy on prisoner
treatment:

``
I'm an interrogator, for the U.S. Army. I convince people to betray
their friends, so my friends can kill their friends. And that's OK with
me. I sleep well at night (mostly, but that's not what wakes me up and
haunts my dreams).

I hate torture. It doesn't work. I would not mentally, nor morally, be
able to sit on a jury where torture is the charge. I would be too prone
to convict. I'd want to hurt convicted torturers. I am not completely
rational on the subject.

If you doubt me, just google my name, and interrogation, or my name and
torture.

So when I say this is worse than torture, I mean it's as bad as bad can
be.

Torture warps and destroys those who use it. That's bad.

It gets bad information, which leads to bad intel, which leads to bad
decisions. That's bad.

Bad decisions leads to the wrong people getting killed. That's bad.

This is worse.

[ ... ]

''

http://www.livejournal.com/users/pecunium/151996.html


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Non amo te, Sabidi, nec possum dicere quare:
hoc tantum possum dicere, non amo te.
I do not like you, Sabid, but I can't say why:
I can only say this, I do not like you.
-- Martialis, "Epigrammaton liber"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39566 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve,

Not being assigned to go into combat is one thing- pulling strings to ensure you never face that assignment (and subsequently lying about it) is an entirely different matter.

In my own case, while stationed in Germany, my regiment (11th Armored Cavalry Regiment in Fulda- ALLONS!) was prepositioned and ready to go down for Gulf War 1, but we instead got orders to train National Guards and Reserves to bring them up to speed before THEY went down. Does that make us any less honorable- no, obviously not. Later, when elements of the regiment were called in after the shooting ceased, my Squadron was assigned to continue our border patrol duties in Germany.

The point that is being made is that when one deliberately uses influence to ensure those orders for combat assignment never come that person is acting in a dishonorable fashion. If Dubya had been a young lieutenant in the 3507th Canteen Repair Battalion, his military record would never have been called into question, as it's doubtful he would have been sent to Vietnam to oversee canteen repairs. BUT- he chose to be a fighter pilot, one of the select few who are supposed to be some of the most aggressive, confident pilots in the world- where was that aggression and confidence put to use? Getting reassigned to Alabama, where he would be 'out of the loop' for combat rotations, had his unit been called up, that's where. He wasn't simply 'not ordered to combat'- he actively took steps to AVOID even the possibility of it. That's the difference.

Vale,
============================================================
From: <annia@...>
Date: 2005/11/19 Sat AM 11:25:57 CST
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Farewell...

============================================================
>>faulted the president for not having been in
combat, which actually isn't a fault.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39567 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve Scaevola,

President Bush has the only qualification necessary to send US troops into combat. He is the elected president of the USA. Who would you prefer to make this decision, the New York Times editorial board? He served honorably as a fighter pilot and had some unspoken about missions that put in harms way near Cuba and her airspace. The fact that his unit was not called into action in Vietnam was not of his making. He was ready to go if asked. Kerry on the other hand selected his duty specifically because when he picked it the swift boats were strictly used off shore where an encounter with the enemy was unheard of. It was his bad luck that they changed the sorties to in-country river patrols. Then he made damn sure to get out in only three months by using scratches as "battle wounds". I don't blame you for some of you feelings, the media is so biased it's a wonder anyone knows anything any more - for example does anyone know that 50,000 people were rescued right after Katrina hit, but all we heard was about how awful things were managed. Thank God Kerry was not made president of the US or Gore. Talk about lies - Kerry should have gotten medals for his whoppers in front of the congressional hearings in 1972. Since then he's been doing the gigolo Tango and singing FLIP, FLOP, FLIP, FLOP!!! Gore has just stated that global warming, not terrorists is the biggest threat to the planet - what a moron!

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: Benjamin A. Okopnik
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Farewell...


Salve,

On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 12:25:57PM -0500, annia@... wrote:
> Salve,
>
> I think it's because you faulted the president for not having been in
> combat, which actually isn't a fault. I've never been in combat either, but
> I served faithfully for 3 years, and I'm planning to go back in after
> college. If I never see combat, I will consider it a good thing, not
> something that I should be faulted for if I ever go into political office.

I fault him and his group of war hawks for sending men and women into
combat for his own ends; for spouting endless lies that lead to their
senseless deaths.

If his stance on the military situation had been "since I know nothing
about military service - let me consult with those who do" - and Colin
Powell's opposition to going into this senseless war is well known -
then his lack of combat experience would be meaningless. As it is, he
took the decision away from those who could have made it with knowledge
and understanding, and our people are dying in a country which was never
a threat to us for his petty personal hatreds and his desire for money.

I don't despise George Bush for not having been in combat. I have made
my reasons explicit here; one of them is simply his lack of
*qualifications* for making the decisions which are now resulting in
deaths of thousands, and are creating terrorists by the planeload by
providing them with the finest combat training in the world. I despise
him for the fact that my children will be reaping what he has sown. I
despise him for his inability to create a coherent policy, or even a
coherent sentence. His lack of combat experience is only a single factor
in his inability to set that policy - and it's one that matters to a
large degree at this moment.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Duo cum faciunt idem, non est idem.
When two do the same thing, it isn't the same (i.e. one can get away with doing
something while another cannot).
-- Terence, "Adelphoe". Cf. "quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi."


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/175 - Release Date: 11/18/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39568 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

Chaps, I hate to be a bore, but may I draw your
attention to the fact that you've started having long
arguments about domestic U.S. politics again (apart
from the occasional mention of Mr. Blair, for which
I'm sure he's grateful)?

Well, time for my supper anyway, so I'll leave you to
it. :)


P.S. M. Flavi, I'm very glad to hear you're not
leaving us for good. The place would be somehow less
exciting without you around. ;)



___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Model Search 2005 - Find the next catwalk superstars - http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/model-search/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39569 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Whatever makes you imagine such a tiny minority of idiots stand a snowball's in
Hell of winning without western help? The only thing that brought the Taliban
to power in one of the world's most backward countries was western arms and
internal collapse. Their own side no more likes or wants them than rational
Weaterners do their Christian equivalents. It is only if they could succeed in
uniting racist prejudice with religious that they could stand a chance of
making themselves appear protectors of the beleagured. The aim of intermittent
terrorism must be to bring this state of making Moslems feel beleagured about.
They are not even succeeding in hijacking the French feeling of exclusion from
society into more than a very French habit of burning things when you don't
like your situation. There's no difference whether somebody plants a bomb or
blows themself up with it except this: suicide bombers only do it once. And
it's a much more limitted career choice.





Salve Quintus Suetonius Paulinus

Funny very funny. : ) Unless they win. : (


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 19,2005 10:05 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Farewell...


Allah Ahkbar!

"The is NOTHING conservative about Islamofascists terrorists whokill
without conscience men, women and child of all faiths tobring about
> an Islamofascists state that would be hell onearth to most of the
worlds people."
>
My friend, you have the tongue of a serpent! By the beard of the
prophet, keep it wagging and I'll cut it out! -:


Peace be upon you,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Timothy P. Gallagher"
wrote:
>
> Salve my friend Quintus Suetonius Paulinus who said in part
>
> "they'll be far more conservative, tenacious and nastier withtheir
words and actions and far to the right of Attila TheHun."
>
> "Conservatism, a general state of mind that is averse torapid
change and innovation and strives for balance and order,while
avoiding extremes."
>
> The is NOTHING conservative about Islamofascists terrorists who
kill without conscience men, women and child of all faiths tobring
about
> an Islamofascists state that would be hell on earth to most of the
worlds people.
>
> Please try and be reasonable on what you label conservative.
>
> I have also asked Marcvs Flavivs Fides to stay but I havedone so
off list. Nova Roma is big enough for ALL viewpoints, eventhe ones I
disagree with and too small for us to lose any of ourcitizens.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)
> To:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 8:48 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Farewell...
>
>
> Salve M. Flavi Fide,
>
> I think everyone here would rather see you stay in NR.I just
wanted
> to ask you how you think things would be different inthe us army
as
> far as liberal and social attitudes are concerned? Isee many of
your
> liberal American senators with serious clout, spoutingoff with
views
> totally contrary to yours on TV are all ex- marinesand army or
navy.
> A few of our girls I know and respect very much in NRare ex
army,
> one in the navy yet and I believe another had been tothe middle
east
> yet they are liberal at times in their views.
>
> Finally, if you go back to the forces, you won't befacing or
> fighting mouthy hippy liberals; they'llbe far more conservative,
> tenacious and nastierwith their words and actions and far to the
> rightof Atilla The Hun.
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus CorneliusLentulus
> wrote:
> >
> > Cn. Cornelius Lentulus M. Flavio Fideisalutem:
> >
> > I don't understand why do you want toleave us. If you feel
> yourself Roman, asyou' ve written many times, you belong in the
New
> Rome. If you would like to leave Nova Roma, Ihave to ask the
> question whether you areindeed a devoted Roman citizen. Do not
care
> for other citizens' personal opinion: you are aNova Roman, a
> citizen of the Reborning Rome -- but if you leave us, you won't
be
> more... Please consider that!
> >
> > Cura ut valeas quam potest optime,Marce Flavi!
> >
> > CN CORN LENTVLVS
> >
> >
> > "M. Lucretius Agricola" ha scritto:
M.
> Lucretius Agricola M. Flavio Fidei s.p.d.
> >
> > I don't understand this at all.Sometimes I don't agree with
you,
> > sure, and sometimes your ideas areopposed, sure, but you
yourself
> > said you get some quiet support.Nowhere have I seen scorn
for
> you as
> > a person or a citizen.
> >
> > I personally would be pleased indeedwere you not to leave. I
feel
> > there is room for all views onmacronational issues as long
as we
> all
> > keep sight of our common interest inRomanitas.
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com,raymond fuentes
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > As A proud Roman &civi that is scorned by most for my
> > > pro-western approach.I leave liberal NR & return to
> > > the US ARMY as an officer.Congrats,youre rid of me.
> > >
> > > S P Q R
> > >
> > > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> > >
> > > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > > Roman Citizen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Cnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
> > Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
> > Accensus Consulis Fr. Apuli Caesaris
> > Scriba Aedilis Curulis L. Iulii Sullae
> > Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae TulliaeScholasticae Senior
> > Scriba Magistri AraneariQ. Cassi Calvi Iunior
> > Sodalis SodalitatisLatinitatis
> > Latinista, ClassicusPhilologus
> >
> >---------------------------------
> > Yahoo!Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message havebeen removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-

Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>>"
on the web.
>
> b.. Tounsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.comhttp://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>>.
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






SPONSORED LINKS Ancient
history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&
w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&
c=4&s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ> Fall of the roman
empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&
w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&
c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA> The fall of the roman
empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&
w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&
c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ> Roman
empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&
w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&
c=4&s=103&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>"
on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an emailto:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use ofYahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on theweb.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an emailto:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










"Take care not to feel towards the inhuman as they feel towards the human" -
Marcus Aurelius.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39570 From: Maior Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
M. Hortensia omnibus spd;
yes, I entirely agree with my good friend Cordus, I
don't bore you with my Libertarian views, please spare us this
tiresome discussion which I can read anywhere (left or right views)
ad nauseam on other forums.
I'm here to discuss all things Roman; now if you like
Fides I'd be happy to make an offering to Mars Ultor for you.
bene valete
Marca Hortensia Maior


Apollonius omnibus sal.
>
> Chaps, I hate to be a bore, but may I draw your
> attention to the fact that you've started having long
> arguments about domestic U.S. politics again (apart
> from the occasional mention of Mr. Blair, for which
> I'm sure he's grateful)?
>
> Well, time for my supper anyway, so I'll leave you to
> it. :)
>
>
> P.S. M. Flavi, I'm very glad to hear you're not
> leaving us for good. The place would be somehow less
> exciting without you around. ;)
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Model Search 2005 - Find the next catwalk superstars -
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/model-search/
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39571 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve, Marce Cassi -

On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 02:31:32PM -0500, Sensei Phil Perez wrote:
> Salve Scaevola,
>
> President Bush has the only qualification necessary to send US troops
> into combat. He is the elected president of the USA.

I must admit to being surprised, amice; much more so if it had been
anyone but you making this statement. Does this mean that your martial
arts students become "qualified" to beat up little old ladies and take
their wallets? Or is there perhaps a *moral* dimension to being strong,
a duty that is an inextricable concomitant of that strength? How,
exactly, do you define honorable behavior?

I'll quote a USENET poster with whom I agree on the subject. Perhaps you
will find a few points here with which you agree with, as well.

``
Honor is about being strong, and controling that strength for the benefit
of others. It's about being worthy of being trusted. It's about having
rules that mean that, even though you have the ability to hurt people, you
choose not to hurt people, as much as you possibly can.

It's about letting what you say be true, and making sure that what you
promise happens. It's about living up to your word. It's about
protecting those in your care. It's about letting one's gentleness temper
one's capacity for violence, and about only letting violence happen in the
service of gentleness.

It's about believing that there's something more important than your own
personal immediate comfort.

-- Xiphias Gladius
''

> Who would you
> prefer to make this decision, the New York Times editorial board?

If they are qualified by their combat, educational, and political
experience, certainly. Otherwise, no.

> He
> served honorably as a fighter pilot and had some unspoken about
> missions that put in harms way near Cuba and her airspace. The fact
> that his unit was not called into action in Vietnam was not of his
> making. He was ready to go if asked.

I'm afraid that's incorrect. Bush lied about his service record; there's
no such thing as "unspoken about missions" that long after the fact,
other than as a vague excuse propagated by his propaganda machine. It's
the standard Bush-and-Rove tactic of claiming unprovable evidence that
can't be revealed because of National security or terrorists.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=George_W._Bush's_military_service/External_Links_2004
(shortcut link: http://tinyurl.com/dflzm )

> Kerry on the other hand selected
> his duty specifically because when he picked it the swift boats were
> strictly used off shore where an encounter with the enemy was unheard
> of.

[blink] I gather Kerry was his own commander when he "chose" his
mission? Interesting.

> It was his bad luck that they changed the sorties to in-country
> river patrols. Then he made damn sure to get out in only three months
> by using scratches as "battle wounds".

All of the above is, of course, extremely biased language that does not
represent the truth in the slightest but instead distorts it in the way
that you claim media distort Bush's claims. I'll be happy to answer it
if and when it's presented in a manner that reflects reality.

> I don't blame you for some of
> you feelings, the media is so biased it's a wonder anyone knows
> anything any more -

I don't watch much TV, Marce Cassi, whether liberal- or
conservative-biased. I do my own research - mostly based on the reports
of the people who were there for the action, or reports from sources as
unbiased as I can determine based on my own judgement. I'm one of those
folks the politicians of all stripes fear worse than death: I'm a man
who uses the means of *direct* sources of information, available via the
Internet and unstoppable and uncontrollable by any political machine.
I've been on the Net since the early days - before it _was_ the Net -
and I _know_ why politicians are terrified of it. It spells the death of
their ability to distort, to hide, to obscure - and this is a source
that is becoming available to a large majority of the world. About to
become nearly universal, in fact:

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1116/p04s01-ussc.html?s=u

The media have caught on to this a long time ago; they do, after all,
deal in information. Many of the large media outlets have cleaned up
their acts - even Washington Post has been known to tell the anti-Bush
truth on occasion, these days, although Fox News remains the den of
lying idiots that it always was. The claim of "lying media", with the
exception of Fox and a vanishingly small number of others, is becoming
more and more /outre/ - more like fairy tales than reality, and would be
much, much better for proof than as a bald statement which proves
nothing.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Mea mihi conscientia pluris est quam omnium sermo.
My conscience means more to me than all speech.
-- Cicero, "Epistulae ad Atticum"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39572 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Avete, omnes -

On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 10:34:55AM -0800, raymond fuentes wrote:
> yea Gods, we agree on something? Is there hope in the
> world?

On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 10:34:55AM -0800, raymond fuentes wrote:
> yea Gods, we agree on something? Is there hope in the
> world?

Of course. I hope that we agree on 'a' being the first letter of the
English alphabet; I'm certain that you will not contest that the Sun
rises in the East; I have little doubt that you will agree that

____________
/ 2
-b + \/ b - 4 a c
x = ----------------------------------
2 a

is accurate. Where we appear to disagree is on the meanings of freedom,
democracy, and duty.

The sky is not falling. If it appears that way, it's only because we're
*ascending.* :)


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Non omne quod licet honestum est.
Not everything that is permitted is honest.
-- Corpus Iuris Civilis: Digesta
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39573 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve, Marca Hortensia; salve, Corde; salvete, omnes.

On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 10:16:52PM -0000, Maior wrote:
> M. Hortensia omnibus spd;
> yes, I entirely agree with my good friend Cordus, I
> don't bore you with my Libertarian views, please spare us this
> tiresome discussion which I can read anywhere (left or right views)
> ad nauseam on other forums.
> I'm here to discuss all things Roman; now if you like
> Fides I'd be happy to make an offering to Mars Ultor for you.
> bene valete
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
>
> Apollonius omnibus sal.
> >
> > Chaps, I hate to be a bore, but may I draw your
> > attention to the fact that you've started having long
> > arguments about domestic U.S. politics again (apart
> > from the occasional mention of Mr. Blair, for which
> > I'm sure he's grateful)?

I, of course, am *all* for keeping the discourse here to matters Roman;
unfortunately, several people here have taken the willingness of those
of us who wish that to be the situation as an opportunity to keep airing
their macronational views, *endlessly*, in this forum. I would like for
them to stop - but I note that they seem to be taking silence as tacit
agreement, either with their views or with their ability to keeping
airing those views unchallenged.

I strongly disagree with their premises, their views, and their
perception of that silence. If someone here was to respond to those
macronational postings every time that they appeared with a reminder
that they are unwelcome here, I'd be satisfied; however, the response
here seems to be "oh, this is getting contentious - *now* we need to say
something about it" - and forgetting that that contention has roots
which inevitably lead to it if they are not dug up as they appear.

I'm afraid that, even though I risk your displeasure, my response to
those posts will be to counter them whenever they appear and as I am
able. If they stop, I will do so as well - but I can no longer tolerate
this one-sided barrage of "rah, rah, USA!" political opinion here.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tamdiu discendum est, quamdiu vivas.
We should learn as long as we may live. (We live and learn.)
-- Seneca Philosophus, "Epistulae"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39574 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: Farewell...
I do not mind macronational debate as long as it is debate. I'm sure Romans
discussed the German Menace and Parthian Situation, not to mention the
continuing Jewish Question. What I do object to to some extent agrees with you,
and assumption that there is a Right side and all others some kind of hostile
conspiracy and that Right means in terms of American Christo-Republican
extremism. To me, one of the main differences between ancient and modern life
is the sense of membership within a community, that there we stand together in
a degree of mutual support and if we do not care when one falls by the wayside,
soon all will fall individually until nothing is left or until all are slaves -
which is to some extent just what happened to Rome in the end. There could not
be a bigger contrast with the American ideal of aggressive personal greed
controlled by and for corporate greed.
Caesariensis

**************
I, of course, am *all* for keeping the discourse here to matters Roman;
unfortunately, several people here have taken the willingness of those
of us who wish that to be the situation as an opportunity to keep airing
their macronational views, *endlessly*, in this forum. I would like for
them to stop - but I note that they seem to be taking silence as tacit
agreement, either with their views or with their ability to keeping
airing those views unchallenged.

I strongly disagree with their premises, their views, and their
perception of that silence. If someone here was to respond to those
macronational postings every time that they appeared with a reminder
that they are unwelcome here, I'd be satisfied; however, the response
here seems to be "oh, this is getting contentious - *now* we need tosay
something about it" - and forgetting that that contention hasroots
which inevitably lead to it if they are not dug up as theyappear.

I'm afraid that, even though I risk your displeasure, my response to
those posts will be to counter them whenever they appear and as I am
able. If they stop, I will do so as well - but I can no longer tolerate
this one-sided barrage of "rah, rah, USA!" political opinionhere.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tamdiu discendum est, quamdiu vivas.
We should learn as long as we may live. (We live and learn.)
-- Seneca Philosophus, "Epistulae"






SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history
Fall of the roman empire
The fall of the romanempire
Roman empire




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on theweb.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an emailto:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










"We have become human doings instead of human beings" - Satish Kumar



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39575 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: TO THE WINNER OF THE 1ST CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM
RANDALL HERRERA RIOS wrote:
> From the sunny country of Costa Rica I’ve got news for
> you... YOUR VICTORY SHOOK US LIKE AN EARTHQUAKE...
> AND WE ARE STILL TREMBLING WITH JOY AND HAPPINESS!!!
>
> Now YOU fly on the wings of heavenly Victory. I pray
> the GODS may give you everlasting inspiration to
> keep on writing and to keep on delighting us with such
> good literature...
>
> I would say more... BUT I CAN’T WAIT TO READ YOUR
> NOVEL!!!

Salve, Servi Iuli Pertinax.

Thank you, thank you! Your eloquence leaves me nigh-speechless. I hope
by now you've read and enjoyed my tale! :)

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39576 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
> Yes, it's a nice idea. I have to say, though, next
> year I'd like to see the word-limit a bit more
> generous, maybe 5,000 words. I don't know about you,
> but I found it very difficult to squeeze a story into
> such a short space - my first draft was about 4,000
> words and I lost some nice material cutting it down.
> Did you find that problem?

Salve, Aule Apolloni Corde.

*cough* Well, actually I'm somewhat at the opposite side of the spectre.
If you've read my story, you may have noticed that it's fairly short -
only some 2000 words, actually. I think my years of having teachers yell
at me about being concise with my reports at a technical education are
showing.

I could've written longer and, should it be published as part of a book,
I probably would like to put a bit more work and words into it.

I think the word-limit was to make the judges feel they wouldn't be
overburdened. Fifty essays of 3000 words is a whole lot more palatable
than fifty of 5000. As it enabled us to "lure in" some very famous and
competent judges, I'm all for it.

However, as long as shorter works are considered on the same merits as
long ones, so that length in itself wasn't an issue, I'd have no problem
with a higher word-limit conceptually. Some stories, such as yours,
would gain from it. But some limit is needed, if nothing else than for
the sake of the judges.

And isn't brevity the soul of wit, after all? ;)

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39577 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
A story Id like to share...
--- aronson@... <aronson@...> wrote:
> The Tailgater
>
> An honest man was being tailgated by a stressed out
woman on a busy
> boulevard. Suddenly, the light turned yellow, just
in front of him.
>
> He did the right thing, stopping at the crosswalk,
even though he
> could have beaten the red light by accelerating
through the
> intersection.
>
> The tailgating woman hit the roof, and the horn,
screaming in
> frustration as she missed her chance to get through
the intersection.
> As she was still in mid-rant, she heard a tap on her
window and looked
> up into the face of a very serious police officer.
The officer ordered
> her to exit her car with her hands up. He took her
to the police
> station where she was searched, finger printed,
photographed and
> placed in a holding cell.
>
> After a couple of hours, a policeman approached the
cell and opened
> the door. She was escorted back to the booking desk
where the
> arresting officer was waiting with her personal
effects.
>
> He said, "I'm very sorry for this mistake. You see,
I pulled up behind
> your car while you were blowing your horn, flipping
off the guy in
> front of you, and cussing a blue streak at him. "I
noticed the 'Choose
> Life' license plate holder, the 'What Would Jesus
Do' bumper sticker,
> the 'Follow Me to Sunday-School' bumper sticker, and
the chrome-plated
> Christian fish emblem on the trunk. Naturally, I
assumed you had
> stolen the car."
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39578 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
M. Lucretius Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.

I propose a 7 day voluntary moratorium on discussion of macronational
politics and current global events other than topics related to
natural disasters and humanitarian aid.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39579 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Salve Agricola,

A fine proposal. I hope the citizenry at large will accept it.

Vale,

-- Marinus

M. Lucretius Agricola wrote:

> M. Lucretius Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.
>
> I propose a 7 day voluntary moratorium on discussion of macronational
> politics and current global events other than topics related to
> natural disasters and humanitarian aid.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39580 From: David Kling Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
C. Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
I accept it, and gladly support the idea.

On 11/19/05, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Agricola,
>
> A fine proposal. I hope the citizenry at large will accept it.
>
> Vale,
>
> -- Marinus
>
> M. Lucretius Agricola wrote:
>
> > M. Lucretius Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.
> >
> > I propose a 7 day voluntary moratorium on discussion of macronational
> > politics and current global events other than topics related to
> > natural disasters and humanitarian aid.
> >


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39581 From: Maior Date: 2005-11-19
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
M. Hortensia M. Lucretio spd;
Apollo devotees have the best ideas;-) thank you Agricola.

Now I'd really like to know Caesariensis, you are so active on the
ML, but the entire time I was Propraetrix of Hibernia I never could
get you to come to a meeting or answer my phone calls. Nova Roma needs
real life cives. What are you doing for Provincia Hibernia?
bene valete
Marca Hortensia Maior TRP

Caput Officina Iuriis et
Investigatio CFBQ



> > M. Lucretius Agricola wrote:
> >
> > > M. Lucretius Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.
> > >
> > > I propose a 7 day voluntary moratorium on discussion of
macronational
> > > politics and current global events other than topics related to
> > > natural disasters and humanitarian aid.
> > >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39582 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
---Salvete Lucretius Agricola et Omnes:

Ahh, yes, an excellent suggestion. It could be imposed legally by the
Praetores but wouldn't it be nice if we just all voluntarily agreed to
this by concensus, for the good of Nova Roma?

One thing, though, and I don't mean to drag this on, but sometimes,
and I saw this in the posts of Minucius Scaevola and Lucinius Crassus
today, it is hard to let things slide.

If one feels that a series of posts is painting an incorrect picture,
whether said series of posts are offtopic (they were posted), a moral
compulsion often catylizes a person to set the record straight. And
so, I saw the reasoning behind the replies of these two gentlemen, and
for the record, quirites, I agree with their analyses.

To end, Lucreti.....I agree, given the current discourses
today...enough is enough.

A couple of years ago, this would have been declared 'off-topic', and
unless it were maybe close to election time, this would have been
accepted by the general populace. It seems people value freedom of
speech without parameters, over uniting in discussion of what we are
here for to being with.

Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@y...>
wrote:
>
> M. Lucretius Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.
>
> I propose a 7 day voluntary moratorium on discussion of macronational
> politics and current global events other than topics related to
> natural disasters and humanitarian aid.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39583 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
---CENSORES ET PRAETORES SAL.

What the heck has this latest offering of Flavius Fides below have
to do with anything Roman?

Flavius Fides has tied up the entire mainlist with macronational,
marginally-related (if you use your imagination) Roman themes, which
perhaps would have best been shared with a professional social
worker, therapist, or in private to a citizen who is willing to
listen and help him brainstorm solutions.

I'm always willing to listen.

This post below is totally unacceptable.

I refuse to accept the steroptype 'Ned Flanders' reputation that is
randomly assigned to persons with the mentality attracted by The
Simpsons. For myself and for others. Especially by Flavius
Fides...judging by his posts today....

Especially in a Nova Roma forum where I am constitutionally entitled
to be subject to the macronational laws of my birth country...(no
unsubstantiated hate stuff assigned to groups of people
posted/published en mass) and where I am theoretically entitled
also to forums which are reasonably moderated to maintain civility.

Please, I ask you Honoured Censores/Praetores either by means of
morality or legality....whatever device....address this behaviour.

This is NOT usenet,or a rap battle board. I don't care if Fides
likes me or not. I'm almost glad he might not. Nonetheless, he is
vandalizing the forum today, with stuff that has little usefulness
in terms of Roman/NovaRoma conflict.


Thanks et valete,
Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@y...>
wrote:
>
> A story Id like to share...
> --- aronson@p... <aronson@p...> wrote:
> > The Tailgater
> >
> > An honest man was being tailgated by a stressed out
> woman on a busy
> > boulevard. Suddenly, the light turned yellow, just
> in front of him.
> >
> > He did the right thing, stopping at the crosswalk,
> even though he
> > could have beaten the red light by accelerating
> through the
> > intersection.
> >
> > The tailgating woman hit the roof, and the horn,
> screaming in
> > frustration as she missed her chance to get through
> the intersection.
> > As she was still in mid-rant, she heard a tap on her
> window and looked
> > up into the face of a very serious police officer.
> The officer ordered
> > her to exit her car with her hands up. He took her
> to the police
> > station where she was searched, finger printed,
> photographed and
> > placed in a holding cell.
> >
> > After a couple of hours, a policeman approached the
> cell and opened
> > the door. She was escorted back to the booking desk
> where the
> > arresting officer was waiting with her personal
> effects.
> >
> > He said, "I'm very sorry for this mistake. You see,
> I pulled up behind
> > your car while you were blowing your horn, flipping
> off the guy in
> > front of you, and cussing a blue streak at him. "I
> noticed the 'Choose
> > Life' license plate holder, the 'What Would Jesus
> Do' bumper sticker,
> > the 'Follow Me to Sunday-School' bumper sticker, and
> the chrome-plated
> > Christian fish emblem on the trunk. Naturally, I
> assumed you had
> > stolen the car."
> >
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39584 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
G Licinius Crassus Omnibus S.P.D.

Agreed. Excellent suggestion.

============================================================
From: "M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@...>
Date: 2005/11/19 Sat PM 09:13:41 CST
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] MORATORIUM PROPOSAL

============================================================
M. Lucretius Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.

I propose a 7 day voluntary moratorium on discussion of macronational
politics and current global events other than topics related to
natural disasters and humanitarian aid.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39585 From: Gaia Apollonia Silana Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Salve -

I am new here - just applied for Citizenship - and have been watching
the macroworld conversation with a bit of confusion. I, for one, agree
with the moratorium idea.

Vale,
Gaia Apollonia Silana

M. Lucretius Agricola wrote:

> M. Lucretius Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.
>
> I propose a 7 day voluntary moratorium on discussion of macronational
> politics and current global events other than topics related to
> natural disasters and humanitarian aid.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39586 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Salve Gaia Apollonia et salvete omnes,

This main list is Roman themed and is supposed to be like the Roman
market place where many topics are discussed. Sometimes discussuions
for one reason or another evolve in the direction of macronational
politics or religion and do so when some of us make blanket
statements, hasty generalizations, emotional appeals etc. no matter
what side of the fence they are on. Many of us feel that the main
list is our Saturday market where these discussions from gossip to
current affairs should and did take place.

Having said that I think experience and common sense has taught us
that there comes a point where the plug should be pulled on various
threads, especially when they start to get too personal, upset some
of the citizens, cause others to leave the list or NR; in short
disrupting the Pax Romana. I just wanted to let you know that we had
a terribly long and ugly religious argument a few months after I
joined Nova Roma (3 years ago) which made me initially scratch my
head; mind you I probably didn't help matters too much when I joined
the fray throwing in my sestaries worth of opinions but in time the
thread ended, some people quit, new people joined and the business
of Rome and Nova Roma continued as it always does.

I just want to point out to you that there are quite a few
sodalistas or special interest groups in NR covering the Latin
language, art, food, geography, the Roman military, relgion,
welcoming/reach out etc. I would encourage you to check them out
also and can assure you the moderation is stricter with respect to
staying on topic.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus






--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaia Apollonia Silana
<samantha@e...> wrote:
>
> Salve -
>
> I am new here - just applied for Citizenship - and have been
watching
> the macroworld conversation with a bit of confusion. I, for one,
agree
> with the moratorium idea.
>
> Vale,
> Gaia Apollonia Silana
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39587 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
M. Lucretius Agricola Quinto Suetonio Paulino S.P.D.


Yes, I quite agree.


Perhaps the very biggest mistake that a newcomer makes is to think
that this, the "Main List", somehow "is" Nova Roma. Nothing could be
farther from the truth. I would go so far as to say that while this
list is important, it is really just a small part of Nova Roma.

There are many citizens involved in different lists and in "real life"
activities. We have citizens interested in cooking, in the arts, in
the Religio, in the Latin language, in saving the imperial eagle...
one could go on. All this is happening both on mailing lists and in
face-to-face meetings.

The challenge for everyone, not just newcomers, is to see past all the
commotion here, in our Forum, and to find a "place" where we as
individual citizens can grow in our Romanitas and contribute to the
welfare of the Res Publica.








--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
>
> Salve Gaia Apollonia et salvete omnes,
>
> This main list is Roman themed and is supposed to be like the Roman
> market place where many topics are discussed. Sometimes discussuions
> for one reason or another evolve in the direction of macronational
> politics or religion and do so when some of us make blanket
> statements, hasty generalizations, emotional appeals etc. no matter
> what side of the fence they are on. Many of us feel that the main
> list is our Saturday market where these discussions from gossip to
> current affairs should and did take place.
>
> Having said that I think experience and common sense has taught us
> that there comes a point where the plug should be pulled on various
> threads, especially when they start to get too personal, upset some
> of the citizens, cause others to leave the list or NR; in short
> disrupting the Pax Romana. I just wanted to let you know that we had
> a terribly long and ugly religious argument a few months after I
> joined Nova Roma (3 years ago) which made me initially scratch my
> head; mind you I probably didn't help matters too much when I joined
> the fray throwing in my sestaries worth of opinions but in time the
> thread ended, some people quit, new people joined and the business
> of Rome and Nova Roma continued as it always does.
>
> I just want to point out to you that there are quite a few
> sodalistas or special interest groups in NR covering the Latin
> language, art, food, geography, the Roman military, relgion,
> welcoming/reach out etc. I would encourage you to check them out
> also and can assure you the moderation is stricter with respect to
> staying on topic.
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaia Apollonia Silana
> <samantha@e...> wrote:
> >
> > Salve -
> >
> > I am new here - just applied for Citizenship - and have been
> watching
> > the macroworld conversation with a bit of confusion. I, for one,
> agree
> > with the moratorium idea.
> >
> > Vale,
> > Gaia Apollonia Silana
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39588 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Gibson's Maccabee Movie - Crash Course On The Revolt / Rome's Help
Salvete omnes,

I am sure most of us that are active in NR are always trying to
promote interest in NR. One way I find to get people interested in
Rome is to be able to discuss movies which are always a popular
topic from pubs and barbeques to the cocktail circute. More often
than not the macro public is quite impressed when you can discuss
many of the innaccuracies or technical flaws in a historical block
buster and the conversation evolves toward our Res Publica from
there. Seeing that the movie Boudicca and The Revolt Of The
Maccabees is on the agenda, I thought it would be a good idea to
learn what we can about the subjects so we have lots of ammo when
the shows hit the screens in the near future.

Now I'll wager that Mel Gibson would probably stick to the bible
facts in the Book Of The Macabees where King Epihanes just gets up,
yawns and starts savagely killing the Jews
and their culture as if it is a sport. Unfortunaetly this situation
is more complex because some other sources I read mention that this
Greek King of the Selucid partition saw the rising threat of Rome
and wanted to strengthen his kingdom by Hellenizing the different
groups and cultures in order to be a unified force to be reckoned
with and he got little co-operation from the Jewish leaders because
of their one god only commandment. Anyway, more often than not
everything would be in black and white and not
addressed in the movie. The same goes for Boudicca as mntioned in my
last post on this subject.

Here is an interesting crash course that should help us out:


Crash Course On The Macabbee Revolt




We know the details of the Jewish fight against the Greeks and
Hellenism from the two Books of the Maccabees.
(These chronicles are not included in the Hebrew Bible because, as
we learned in Part 26, the Men of the Great Assembly had decided
many years earlier what the Hebrew Bible should consist of and these
events occurred much later in time. The Books of the Maccabees,
which were probably written by a Hasmonean chronicler, who was
certainly not a prophet, can be found in a collection called Sefer
HaChitzonim which also contains other writings left out of the
Hebrew Bible and which are mentioned or quoted in the Talmud.)
This revolt of the Jews sets a precedent in human history. It is the
world's first ideological/religious war. No one in the ancient world
died for their gods; only the Jews thought that their religion - the
only monotheistic religion at the time - was worth dying for.
But (as we saw in Part 28), it is not just a war against the Greeks,
it is also a civil war - Jews, who were loyal to Judaism, fighting
other Jews, who had become Hellenized and who were siding with the
Greeks.
The year is 167 BCE and the horrible persecution of Judaism by the
Greeks is in full swing. The Greek troops show up in the town of
Modi'in (a site west of Jerusalem which you can visit today off the
Jerusalem-Tel Aviv highway) and demand that the Jews there sacrifice
a pig to the Greek gods. The elder of the town, Mattathias, who is a
cohen, that is of the priestly class, refuses.


One Hellenized Jew is willing to do what is unspeakable in Jewish
eyes -- sacrifice a pig.



But there is a Hellenized Jew in the town who is willing to do what
is unspeakable in Jewish eyes. As he's about to sacrifice the pig,
Mattathias stabs him, also killing the Greek official present. He
then turns to the crowd and announces: "Follow me, all of you who
are for God's law and stand by the covenant." (1 Maccabees 2:27)
Those who join Mattathias and his five sons - named Judah, Elazar,
Yohanan, Yonaton and Shimon - head for the hills, expecting that the
Greeks are going to come back and wipe out the whole village as a
reprisal. In the hills, they organize a guerilla army, led primarily
by the oldest of the sons named Judah, nicknamed Maccabee, which
means "the Hammer." Maccabee is also an acronym for mi komocho
ba'alim Hashem, "who is like you among the powers O God," - the
battle cry of the Jewish people.
We don't know exactly how large this Maccabee army was, but even the
most optimistic estimates put the number at no more than 12,000 men.
This tiny force takes on the fighting Greek army of up to 40,000
men.
It's not just a numerical superiority the Greeks have. The Greeks
are professional soldiers - they have equipment, they have training,
and they have a herd of war elephants, which were the tanks of the
ancient world. The Jews are vastly outnumbered, poorly trained, and
poorly equipped (not to mention, they have no elephants), but what
they lack in training and equipment they make up in spirit.
Most of the battles take place in the foothills leading from the
coastal plain area (Tel Aviv) to Jerusalem. The Greeks are trying to
march their armies up the natural canyons that lead into the
mountain areas, the stronghold of the Jewish army. There's only a
few places where the Greeks can ascend and this is where the
Maccabees choose to take them on.
Now when we read the story of the Maccabees it seems like it's
something that takes place over a few weeks - the battles take
place, the Jews win, and the Greeks go home. But, in fact, it takes
25 years of fighting and a great many casualties on both sides.

CHANUKAH

After the first three years, the Jews are able re-conquer Jerusalem.
They find the Temple defiled and turned into a pagan sanctuary,
where pigs are sacrificed on the altar. When they re-enter the
Temple, the first thing they do is try to light a make-shift menorah
(as the real gold one had been melted down by the Greeks) but only
one vial of pure lamp oil with the special seal is discovered. They
use this vial to light the menorah and miraculously it stays lit for
eight days, by which time fresh pure oil has been pressed and
delivered to the Temple.


The Maccabees then purify the Temple and rededicate it on the 25th
of Kislev.



The Maccabees then purify the Temple and rededicate it on the 25th
of Kislev, which is the date on the Hebrew calendar when we begin to
celebrate the eight days of Chanukah. (The Hebrew word Chanukah
means "dedication" or "inauguration.")
Chanukah - one of two holidays added to the Jewish calendar by the
rabbis - celebrates two kinds of miracles: 1) the military victory
of the vastly outnumbered Jews against the Greeks; and 2) the
spiritual victory of Jewish values over those of the Greek. It is
this spiritual victory which is symbolized by the lights of
Chanukah. (For more on Chanukah click here.)
The rededication of the Temple does not end the fight however.
Unfortunately, some of the Hellenized Jews are not happy that the
Maccabees took over Jerusalem, and they join forces with the Greeks
and the fight continues.
It's not until 142 BCE, during the reign of Seleucid monarch
Demitrius, that the Greeks finally have enough of the fighting and
sign a peace treaty with Simon, the last survivor of the five sons
of Mattathias.
In [that] year, Israel was released from the gentile yoke; the
people began to write on their contracts and agreements: "In the
first year of Simon, the great High Priest, general and leader of
the Jews." (1 Maccabees 13:41-42)
Thus Jewish sovereignty over the Land of Israel is officially
restored.

THE REIGN OF THE HASMONEANS
As noted above, Mattathias was a cohen, and so it is not surprising
that his son, Simon, should become High Priest. But Simon also takes
on himself the title of nasi meaning "prince/president/leader." He
did not call himself king because he knew full well that a Jewish
king could only come from the line of David.
(The line of David - the line of kings - comes from the tribe of
Judah, whereas the line of the cohanim, the priests, comes from the
tribe of Levi, as per the blessing of Jacob on his twelve sons, the
twelve tribes of Israel.)


The Hasmoneans should not have been kings in the first place and
they became corrupted by power.



This is a bad choice on the part of Simon because his descendants do
not respect this distinction. They start a new ruling dynasty in
Israel - the Hasmonean dynasty - which lasts for 103 years and which
is marked by a terrible moral and religious decline. They should not
have been kings in the first place and then they became corrupted by
their own power.
The next ruler is Yochanan Hyrcanus, and we can see from his name
the Greek influence that is creeping in -- the Hasmoneans are
becoming Hellenized. This is a terrible tragedy since their
ancestors had given their lives to throw off the yoke of Hellenism.
Among his many errors, Yochanan Hyrcanus does a terrible anti-Jewish
thing. As part of his effort to expand the borders of Israel, he
forcibly converts the newly conquered peoples. This is something
Judaism has never done before nor since -- Jews discourage converts
rather than the other way around.
One of the peoples that are forcibly converted at this time are the
Idumeans. And this error costs the Jews dearly.
In Israel, near Beit Shemesh, there is a fascinating archeological
site open to tourists called Beit Guvrin Maresha. It consists of
some 2,000 caves that are mostly cut in the limestone. This was one
of the major cities of the Idumeans. And you can even play
archeologist and go there and dig for a day. This is one of the
places that the Hasmoneans conquered, giving the people a choice -
convert or leave.
One of the Idumean families that is forcibly converted will become
very significant for its role in the drama some years later when the
Romans invade. A descendant of this family - Herod - will be
appointed Jewish king and he will be a schizophrenic ruler. He will
murder the High Priest, 45 members of the Jewish Supreme Court as
well as most of his own family, but he will also embark on a series
of fantastic building projects that will include the city of
Caesarea, the fortress at Masada, and a total re-building of the
Temple. As we will see, Herod (who is only nominally Jewish) will
have a very schizophrenic relationship with the Jews.
DECLINE OF JEWISH RULE
The son of Yochananon Hyracanus, Alexander Yanai, is a classic case
of Hasmonean ruler gone totally off. He is completely Hellenized and
siding with the Sadducees (the Jews who only follow the Written
Torah, making up their own interpretations) against the Pharisees
(the mainstream Jews).
When some of the Pharisees oppose him, he has 800 of them executed
after first forcing them to watch the slaughter of their families.
During the executions, Alexander Yannai hosts a Greek-style feast.


Alexander Yannai has 800 of his opponents executed after first
slaughtering their families in front of them.



This is a classic case of one of the great tragic families starting
off so illustriously and ending so disastrously, bringing the Jewish
people to ruin.
The last two Hasmonean rulers are two brothers Hyrcanus and
Aristobolus, both of whom are totally Hellenized. Hyrcanus is the
weaker of the two but he has a strong advisor by the name of
Antipater, a descendant of Idumean converts to Judaism (who just
happens to have a baby boy named Herod).
The brothers are fighting with each other as to who should be king.
The obvious answer is neither. But tell that to morally corrupt,
power hungry men. They hit on the idea of asking Rome to mediate in
their dispute.
Inviting the Romans in is not like inviting a multi-national peace-
keeping force or international mediation team. We're talking about
people with an incredible energy to conquer and gain all the
territory they can.
The year is 63 BCE and the great Roman general Pompeii is cleaning
up the last of the Greek Empire. He is more than happy to oblige and
move his armies into Israel.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39590 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
I thought it was a cute story,PO.No need for decrees,
Im sorry.It WONT happen again.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
> ---CENSORES ET PRAETORES SAL.
>
> What the heck has this latest offering of Flavius
Fides below have
> to do with anything Roman?
>
> Flavius Fides has tied up the entire mainlist with
macronational,
> marginally-related (if you use your imagination)
Roman themes, which
> perhaps would have best been shared with a
professional social
> worker, therapist, or in private to a citizen who is
willing to
> listen and help him brainstorm solutions.
>
> I'm always willing to listen.
>
> This post below is totally unacceptable.
>
> I refuse to accept the steroptype 'Ned Flanders'
reputation that is
> randomly assigned to persons with the mentality
attracted by The
> Simpsons. For myself and for others. Especially by
Flavius
> Fides...judging by his posts today....
>
> Especially in a Nova Roma forum where I am
constitutionally entitled
> to be subject to the macronational laws of my birth
country...(no
> unsubstantiated hate stuff assigned to groups of
people
> posted/published en mass) and where I am
theoretically entitled
> also to forums which are reasonably moderated to
maintain civility.
>
> Please, I ask you Honoured Censores/Praetores either
by means of
> morality or legality....whatever device....address
this behaviour.
>
> This is NOT usenet,or a rap battle board. I don't
care if Fides
> likes me or not. I'm almost glad he might not.
Nonetheless, he is
> vandalizing the forum today, with stuff that has
little usefulness
> in terms of Roman/NovaRoma conflict.
>
>
> Thanks et valete,
> Pompeia
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...>
> wrote:
> >
> > A story Id like to share...
> > --- aronson@p... <aronson@p...> wrote:
> > > The Tailgater
> > >
> > > An honest man was being tailgated by a stressed
out
> > woman on a busy
> > > boulevard. Suddenly, the light turned yellow,
just
> > in front of him.
> > >
> > > He did the right thing, stopping at the
crosswalk,
> > even though he
> > > could have beaten the red light by accelerating
> > through the
> > > intersection.
> > >
> > > The tailgating woman hit the roof, and the horn,
> > screaming in
> > > frustration as she missed her chance to get
through
> > the intersection.
> > > As she was still in mid-rant, she heard a tap on
her
> > window and looked
> > > up into the face of a very serious police
officer.
> > The officer ordered
> > > her to exit her car with her hands up. He took
her
> > to the police
> > > station where she was searched, finger printed,
> > photographed and
> > > placed in a holding cell.
> > >
> > > After a couple of hours, a policeman approached
the
> > cell and opened
> > > the door. She was escorted back to the booking
desk
> > where the
> > > arresting officer was waiting with her personal
> > effects.
> > >
> > > He said, "I'm very sorry for this mistake. You
see,
> > I pulled up behind
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39591 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: a.d. XII Kal. Dec.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem XII Kalendas Decembris; haec dies comitialis est.

"Not long after this the Dictator appeared, and at once ordered the
trumpet to sound the Assembly. When silence was restored an usher
summoned Q. Fabius, the Master of the Horse. He advanced and stood
immediately below the Dictator's tribunal. The Dictator began:
"Quintus Fabius, inasmuch as the Dictator possesses supreme authority,
to which the consuls who exercise the old kingly power, and the
praetors who are elected under the same auspices as the consuls alike
submit, I ask you whether or not you think it right and fitting that
the Master of the Horse should bow to that authority? Further, I ask
you whether as I was aware that I had left the City under doubtful
auspices I ought to have jeopardised the safety of the republic in the
face of this religious difficulty, or whether I ought to have taken
the auspices afresh and so avoided any action till the pleasure of the
gods was known? I should also like to know whether, if a religious
impediment prevents the Dictator from acting, the Master of the Horse
is at liberty to consider himself free and unhampered by such
impediment? But why am I putting these questions? Surely, if I had
gone away without leaving any orders, you ought to have used your
judgment in interpreting my wishes and acted accordingly. Answer me
this, rather: Did I forbid you to take any action in my absence? Did I
forbid you to engage the enemy? In contempt of my orders, whilst the
auspices were still indecisive and the sanctions of religion withheld,
you dared to give battle, in defiance of all the military custom and
discipline of our ancestors, in defiance of the will of the gods.
Answer the questions put to you, but beware of uttering a single word
about anything else. Lictor, stand by him!"

Fabius found it far from easy to reply to each question in detail, and
protested against the same man being both accuser and judge in a
matter of life and death. He exclaimed that it would be easier to
deprive him of his life than of the glory he had won, and went on to
exculpate himself and bring charges against the Dictator. Papirius in
a fresh outburst of rage ordered the Master of the Horse to be
stripped and the rods and axes to be got ready. Fabius appealed to the
soldiers for help, and as the lictors began to tear off his clothes,
he retreated behind the triarii who were now raising a tumult. Their
shouts were taken up through the whole concourse, threats and
entreaties were heard everywhere. Those nearest the tribunal, who
could be recognised as being within view of the Dictator implored him
to spare the Master of the Horse and not with him to condemn the whole
army; those furthest off and the men who had closed round Fabius
reviled the Dictator as unfeeling and merciless. Matters were rapidly
approaching a mutiny. Even those on the tribunal did not remain quiet;
the staff officers who were standing round the Dictator's chair begged
him to adjourn the proceedings to the following day to allow his anger
to cool and give time for quiet consideration. They urged that the
youthful spirit of Fabius had been sufficiently chastened and his
victory sufficiently sullied; they begged him not to push his
punishment to extremities or to brand with ignominy not only a youth
of exceptional merit but also his distinguished father and the whole
Fabian house. When they found their arguments and entreaties alike
unavailing, they asked him to look at the angry multitude in front. To
add fire to men whose tempers were already inflamed and to provide the
materials for a mutiny was, they said, unworthy of a man of his age
and experience. If a mutiny did occur, no one would throw the blame of
it upon Q. Fabius, who was only deprecating punishment; the sole
responsibility would lie on the Dictator for having in his blind
passion provoked the multitude to a deplorable struggle with him. And
as a final argument they declared that to prevent him from supposing
that they were actuated by any personal feeling in favour of Fabius,
they were prepared to state on oath that they considered the
infliction of punishment on Fabius under present circumstances to be
detrimental to the interests of the State." - Livy, History of Rome 8.31


"Quickly, Demeter let the corn grow up from the fertile fields,
and the broad earth was weighed down with leaves and flowers.
But she, going to the law-giving kings,
showed to them – to Triptolemus and to Diocles, driver of horses,
to strong Eumolpus and to Keleus, leader of his people –
the rituals of her worship, and instituted secret rites for all of
them." - Homeric Hymn to Demeter

"But after Praetextatus, who held the office of proconsul in Greece,
declared that this law would make the life of the Greeks unliveable,
if they were prevented from properly observing the most sacred
Mysteries, which hold the whole human race together, he permitted the
entire rite to be performed in the manner inherited from the ancestors
as if the edict were not valid." - Zosimus, Historia Nova IV.33

"...but these things are small: you, a pious initiate of the holy
mysteries, grasp hiddenly the discoveries of the mind; and manifoldly
learned, you cultivate the divine numen." - from the Epitaph of
Paulina to Praetextaus

"To the gods of the dead. Vettius Agorius Praetextatus, augur, priest
of Vesta, priest of the Sun, quindecemvir, curialis of Hercules,
initiate of Liber and the Eleusinian [mysteries], hierophant,
neocorus, tauroboliatus, father of fathers. In public office imperial
quaestor, praetor of Rome, governor of Tuscia and Umbria, governor of
Lusitania, proconsul of Achaia, praefect of Rome, senatorial legate on
seven missions, prefect of the praetorian guard twice in Italy and
Illyrica, consul ordinarius elect, and Aconia Fabia Paulina, initiate
of Ceres and the Eleusinian [mysteries], initiate of Hecate at Aegina,
tauroboliata, hierophant. They lived together for 40 years." - from
the tomb of Paulina and Praetextatus

Today is dedicated to Paulina and Praetextatus, two gaurdians of the
Eleusinian Mysteries who, in A.D. 364, defied the order of the emperor
Valentinian I to suppress the practice of the Mysteries, and continued
them for another 20 years.

The Mysteries were based on a legend revolving around Demeter. Her
daughter, Persephone, was kidnapped by Hades, the god of death and the
underworld. Demeter was the goddess of life, agriculture and
fertility. She neglected her duties while searching for her daughter;
causing a dry season (summer in Greece) in which people starved—
today, we associate this with the first winter. During this time
Demeter taught the secrets of agriculture to Triptolemus. Finally
Demeter was reunited with her daughter and the earth came back to
life— the first spring. (For more information on this story, see
Demeter.) Persephone was unfortunately unable to stay permanently in
the land of the living, because she had eaten six seeds of a
pomegranate that Hades had given her. Those that eat the food of the
dead may not return. A compromise was worked out and Persephone stayed
with Hades for one third of the year (winter, as the Greeks only
recognized three seasons, skipping autumn) and with her mother the
remaining eight months. The Eleusinian Mysteries celebrated
Persephone's return, for it was also the return of plants and of life
to the earth. She had eaten the six pomegranate seeds (symbols of
lives) while in the underworld (underground, like seeds in the winter)
and her rebirth is therefore symbolic of the rebirth of all plant life
during the spring and, by extension, all life on earth.

There were two Eleusinian Mysteries: the Greater and the Lesser. The
Lesser Mysteries were held in Anthesterion (March) (the exact time was
not always fixed and changed occasionally, unlike the Greater
Mysteries). The priests purified the candidates for initiation myesis.
They first sacrificed a pig to Demeter and then purified themselves.
The Greater Mysteries took place in Boedromion (the first month of the
Attic calendar) and lasted nine days. The first act (14th Boedromion)
of the Greater Mysteries was the bringing of the sacred objects from
Eleusis to the Eleusinion, a temple at the base of the Acropolis.

The Roman emperor Theodosius I finally closed the sanctuaries by
decree in A.D. 392 in an effort to destroy pagan resistance to the
imposition of Christianity as a state religion. The last remnants of
the Mysteries were wiped out in A.D. 396, when Alaric, King of the
Goths, invaded accompanied by Christians "in their dark garments",
bringing Arian Christianity and desecrating the old sacred sites. The
closing of the Eleusinian Mysteries in the 4th century is reported by
Eunapios, a historian and biographer of the Greek philosophers.
Eunapios had been initiated by the last legitimate Hierophant, who had
been commissioned by the emperor Julian to restore the Mysteries,
which had fallen into decay. The very last Hierophant was a usurper,
"the man from Thespiai who held the rank of Father in the mysteries of
Mithras" Eunapios calls him.

Vettius Agorius Praetextatus was one of the political leaders of the
pagan intellectual movement in an increasingly Christian late imperial
Rome. Now while it was not quite as bad to be a pagan in Christian
Rome as it had been to be a Christian in pagan Rome — not only you
were not tortured or killed, but you could have the distinguished
career we read in the inscription above — it did take courage. In the
face of the Christian juggernaut, Praetextatus, his activist wife
Fabia Aconia Paulina, and a circle of friends including the statesman
and writer Symmachus, used mostly religious and cultural means to
fight the rearguard battle for Roman classical religion and ideals:
literary works, statues, the restoration of temples.

Valete bene!

Cato




SOURCES

Livy, Paulina and Praetextatus
(http://www.stoa.org/diotima/anthology/wlgr/wlgr-religion439.shtml)
and Wikipedia and
(http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Gazetteer/Places/Europe/Italy/Lazio/Roma/Rome/museums/Museo_Nazionale_Romano/Palazzo_Altemps/inscriptions/Vettius_Praetextatus.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39592 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: CHARIOT RACES: Gratias magna victoria
Salvete,

very nice race indeed. Thank you for these races and games. And congrats to the winner!!

Vaete,

Scipio

--- "G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana" <silvanatextrix@...> wrote:

> G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Iulio Sabino, S. Apolloni Scipio,
> Gn. Equiti Marino SPD.
>
> Certe pro tertia et magna victoria Dios Deasque debemus laudare.
> In caelo gratias ago.





__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39593 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Gibson's Maccabee Movie - Crash Course On The Revolt / Rome's H
Salve, Quintus Suetonius Paulinus; salvete, omnes.

On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 10:11:21AM -0000, Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) wrote:
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I am sure most of us that are active in NR are always trying to
> promote interest in NR. One way I find to get people interested in
> Rome is to be able to discuss movies which are always a popular
> topic from pubs and barbeques to the cocktail circute. More often
> than not the macro public is quite impressed when you can discuss
> many of the innaccuracies or technical flaws in a historical block
> buster and the conversation evolves toward our Res Publica from
> there. Seeing that the movie Boudicca and The Revolt Of The
> Maccabees is on the agenda, I thought it would be a good idea to
> learn what we can about the subjects so we have lots of ammo when
> the shows hit the screens in the near future.
>
> Now I'll wager that Mel Gibson would probably stick to the bible
> facts in the Book Of The Macabees where King Epihanes just gets up,
> yawns and starts savagely killing the Jews
> and their culture as if it is a sport. Unfortunaetly this situation
> is more complex because some other sources I read mention that this
> Greek King of the Selucid partition saw the rising threat of Rome
> and wanted to strengthen his kingdom by Hellenizing the different
> groups and cultures in order to be a unified force to be reckoned
> with and he got little co-operation from the Jewish leaders because
> of their one god only commandment. Anyway, more often than not
> everything would be in black and white and not
> addressed in the movie. The same goes for Boudicca as mntioned in my
> last post on this subject.
>
> Here is an interesting crash course that should help us out:

[ snip ]

Fascinating material, Pauline. Where is it quoted from, if I might ask?
I'm actually quite interested in that period of history, and this looks
like something I'd like to read.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Dum inter homines sumus, colamus humanitatem.
As long as we are among humans, let us be humane.
-- Seneca, "De ira"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39594 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
C. Equitius Cato quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

I had posted my agreement to the idea of a moratorium when something
struck me after re-reading several posts.

Are we indeed an on-line Yahoo! Group dedicated to studying Roman
history --- or are we a living Roman community?

The difference is important.

If we are a group interested in Roman history (with a couple of jazzy
titles for our leaders), then we are basically the same as any number
of philosophical, historical, educational, religious, &c. groups one
can vist and/or join on the internet. A few interesting topics, a
nice (pseudo)scholarly debate, everyone smiling and very pleased at
how wonderful it is to be in such an erudite, like-minded bunch of web
users. Nothing too emotional, thank you, except in a distant kind of way.

If we are a Roman community, then we are far beyond that. The Forum
(the name I prefer to use for this, the so-called "Main List") is
where we meet together and speak and interact. Where do we draw the
line at what is, as Senatrix Minucia-Tiberia Strabo has called it,
"marginally-related"? What can be considered marginal to a place
where citizens gather with each other to speak? Aside from the
generally-accepted level of civility --- which (truth be told) would
never have been applied in the Forum of ancient Rome, and which we
suffer solely because it is a requirement of the Yahoo! standards ---
what we have witnessed is simply the interaction of citizens in a
public space in a free society.

When I read these posts, I was tempted to agree with the senatrix and
I certainly understand her reasoning.

Then I had to think, "Well, what if the discussions I've had about
legal issues are as uninteresting to other citizens as these are to
me? Should I have been muzzled?" (NO COMMENTS PLEASE) What line does
one draw determining the level of interest (or lack thereof) necessary
for a topic to be considered important --- or dismissed as "marginal"?

Apollonius Cordus and others have voiced issues with
"Americanocentrism" in this Forum --- and these are understandable as
well; I agree that the Forum is not simply the default "American
List", as it were. However, the role that the United States plays in
the world around us is of such immediacy, and has such repercussions
on every nation in every corner of the globe, that to pretend that
these actions (and their political and philosophical ramifications)
are marginal to the existence of anyone on the planet is an
unsupportable idea. It is simply a fact, and trying to pretend it
does not exist is the equivalent of trying to ignore the elephant in
the room because you're not interested in (or don't like) elephants.
Yes, yes, I know --- everybody's tired of hearing about the United
States. Imagine how the Egyptians felt about Rome.

When a citizen is told to "take it to another List", we are
essentially saying, "what you are interested in talking about is
either not interesting to or not appropriate for the public". But
this is the Forum; the only way, for many of our citizens, to ever
interact with each other. Religion, politics, and sex --- the three
things which we are told NEVER to discuss with people we don't know
--- are a part of the life of a community.


So, which do we value more? Freedom of speech, or "freedom" from
being offended by another citizen's views, no matter how ridiculous,
unimportant, or outlandish one might think they are?

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39595 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
M. Lucretius Agricola C. Equitio Catoni S.P.D.

Indeed my friend, this is much more than a history discussion group.
Still, it is well when a single topic comes to dominate this forum,
when clear progress is not being made toward an end, for the
participants to voluntarily yield the space to other topics, even for
a short time.



Now while we are on the topic of this Forum, I have a request. Is
there any way that we could see here a kind of periodic newsletter in
which leaders of different groups and projects could give us a summary
of the activity in their groups for the past, say, month? Our
activites are spread out over so many lists that it is just not
possible to monitor everything that one might have a bit of interest
in. I mean just a few lines from each group, not an essay, not even a
full paragraph.


I assure you all that I have not got the time to take on something
like this now, but I would really love to see it. Surely there is a
citizen of a journalistic bent?




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> I had posted my agreement to the idea of a moratorium when something
> struck me after re-reading several posts.
>
> Are we indeed an on-line Yahoo! Group dedicated to studying Roman
> history --- or are we a living Roman community?
>
> The difference is important.
>
> If we are a group interested in Roman history (with a couple of jazzy
> titles for our leaders), then we are basically the same as any number
> of philosophical, historical, educational, religious, &c. groups one
> can vist and/or join on the internet. A few interesting topics, a
> nice (pseudo)scholarly debate, everyone smiling and very pleased at
> how wonderful it is to be in such an erudite, like-minded bunch of web
> users. Nothing too emotional, thank you, except in a distant kind
of way.
>
> If we are a Roman community, then we are far beyond that. The Forum
> (the name I prefer to use for this, the so-called "Main List") is
> where we meet together and speak and interact. Where do we draw the
> line at what is, as Senatrix Minucia-Tiberia Strabo has called it,
> "marginally-related"? What can be considered marginal to a place
> where citizens gather with each other to speak? Aside from the
> generally-accepted level of civility --- which (truth be told) would
> never have been applied in the Forum of ancient Rome, and which we
> suffer solely because it is a requirement of the Yahoo! standards ---
> what we have witnessed is simply the interaction of citizens in a
> public space in a free society.
>
> When I read these posts, I was tempted to agree with the senatrix and
> I certainly understand her reasoning.
>
> Then I had to think, "Well, what if the discussions I've had about
> legal issues are as uninteresting to other citizens as these are to
> me? Should I have been muzzled?" (NO COMMENTS PLEASE) What line does
> one draw determining the level of interest (or lack thereof) necessary
> for a topic to be considered important --- or dismissed as "marginal"?
>
> Apollonius Cordus and others have voiced issues with
> "Americanocentrism" in this Forum --- and these are understandable as
> well; I agree that the Forum is not simply the default "American
> List", as it were. However, the role that the United States plays in
> the world around us is of such immediacy, and has such repercussions
> on every nation in every corner of the globe, that to pretend that
> these actions (and their political and philosophical ramifications)
> are marginal to the existence of anyone on the planet is an
> unsupportable idea. It is simply a fact, and trying to pretend it
> does not exist is the equivalent of trying to ignore the elephant in
> the room because you're not interested in (or don't like) elephants.
> Yes, yes, I know --- everybody's tired of hearing about the United
> States. Imagine how the Egyptians felt about Rome.
>
> When a citizen is told to "take it to another List", we are
> essentially saying, "what you are interested in talking about is
> either not interesting to or not appropriate for the public". But
> this is the Forum; the only way, for many of our citizens, to ever
> interact with each other. Religion, politics, and sex --- the three
> things which we are told NEVER to discuss with people we don't know
> --- are a part of the life of a community.
>
>
> So, which do we value more? Freedom of speech, or "freedom" from
> being offended by another citizen's views, no matter how ridiculous,
> unimportant, or outlandish one might think they are?
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39596 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Im responsible for a lot of the marginal topics.As I
have stated as you have just now-if all we talked
about was Roma,wed be a study group not a community.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
> C. Equitius Cato quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> I had posted my agreement to the idea of a
moratorium when something
> struck me after re-reading several posts.
>
> Are we indeed an on-line Yahoo! Group dedicated to
studying Roman
> history --- or are we a living Roman community?
>
> The difference is important.
>
> If we are a group interested in Roman history (with
a couple of jazzy
> titles for our leaders), then we are basically the
same as any number
> of philosophical, historical, educational,
religious, &c. groups one
> can vist and/or join on the internet. A few
interesting topics, a
> nice (pseudo)scholarly debate, everyone smiling and
very pleased at
> how wonderful it is to be in such an erudite,
like-minded bunch of web
> users. Nothing too emotional, thank you, except in
a distant kind of way.
>
> If we are a Roman community, then we are far beyond
that. The Forum
> (the name I prefer to use for this, the so-called
"Main List") is
> where we meet together and speak and interact.
Where do we draw the
> line at what is, as Senatrix Minucia-Tiberia Strabo
has called it,
> "marginally-related"? What can be considered
marginal to a place
> where citizens gather with each other to speak?
Aside from the
> generally-accepted level of civility --- which
(truth be told) would
> never have been applied in the Forum of ancient
Rome, and which we
> suffer solely because it is a requirement of the
Yahoo! standards ---
> what we have witnessed is simply the interaction of
citizens in a
> public space in a free society.
>
> When I read these posts, I was tempted to agree with
the senatrix and
> I certainly understand her reasoning.
>
> Then I had to think, "Well, what if the discussions
I've had about
> legal issues are as uninteresting to other citizens
as these are to
> me? Should I have been muzzled?" (NO COMMENTS
PLEASE) What line does
> one draw determining the level of interest (or lack
thereof) necessary
> for a topic to be considered important --- or
dismissed as "marginal"?
>
> Apollonius Cordus and others have voiced issues with
> "Americanocentrism" in this Forum --- and these are
understandable as
> well; I agree that the Forum is not simply the
default "American
> List", as it were. However, the role that the
United States plays in
> the world around us is of such immediacy, and has
such repercussions
> on every nation in every corner of the globe, that
to pretend that
> these actions (and their political and philosophical
ramifications)
> are marginal to the existence of anyone on the
planet is an
> unsupportable idea. It is simply a fact, and trying
to pretend it
> does not exist is the equivalent of trying to ignore
the elephant in
> the room because you're not interested in (or don't
like) elephants.
> Yes, yes, I know --- everybody's tired of hearing
about the United
> States. Imagine how the Egyptians felt about Rome.
>
> When a citizen is told to "take it to another List",
we are
> essentially saying, "what you are interested in
talking about is
> either not interesting to or not appropriate for the
public". But
> this is the Forum; the only way, for many of our
citizens, to ever
> interact with each other. Religion, politics, and
sex --- the three
> things which we are told NEVER to discuss with
people we don't know
> --- are a part of the life of a community.
>
>
> So, which do we value more? Freedom of speech, or
"freedom" from
> being offended by another citizen's views, no matter
how ridiculous,
> unimportant, or outlandish one might think they are?
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39597 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Salvete Omnes,

> what we have witnessed is simply the interaction of citizens
> in a public space in a free society.

I agree that the Forum in Roma Antiqua was indeed an open space where anybody could be
seen and anything could be heard. However, it is hard to consider an open list as a
Forum. If I was in the Forum in Roma Antiqua and a discussion around was irrelevant for
me, I could easily go on the other side of the Forum and participate to another
discussion.

This is not possible on an open list like Yahoo. During the last days, I got more than
150 messages concerning politics in the USA.
And because I am a magistrate, I am obliged to have a look on all of them. If those
messages were on another list and be then considered as irrelevant for the life in Nova
Roma, I could spare some precious time.

Valete,

Sextus Apollonius Scipio

Propraetor Galliae



__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39598 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
Salve Pompeia, et salvete omnes,

pompeia_minucia_tiberia wrote:
> ---CENSORES ET PRAETORES SAL.
[...]
> This post below is totally unacceptable.

It is. I ask the praetores to place Fides on moderation until such time
as he demonstrates that he understands the praetorian edictum concerning
posting to the mainlist.

Vale,

Gn. Equitius Marinus
Censor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39599 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Salve Cato who said in part

I've gotten the feeling that these posts were approaching the "crying 'FIRE!' in a crowded theatre" level...

Wrong Cato! Not even close. From the NR constitution

"The following rights of the Citizens who have reached the age of 18 shall be guaranteed, but this enumeration shall not be taken to exclude other rights that citizens may possess:"

"The right to participate in all public fora and discussions, and the right to reasonably expect such fora to be supported by the State. Such communications,

regardless of their content, may not be restricted by the State, except where they represent an imminent and clear danger to the Republic.

Such officially sponsored fora may be expected to be reasonably moderated in the interests of maintaining order and civility;"

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus







----- Original Message -----
From: gaiusequitiuscato<mailto:mlcinnyc@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 5:47 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL


C. Equitius Cato M. Lucretio Agricolae sal.

Salve, Agricole.

Very good idea. There are few macronational freedoms as important as
the freedom of speech; however, I've gotten the feeling that these
posts were approaching the "crying 'FIRE!' in a crowded theatre" level...

Vale bene,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola"
<wm_hogue@y...> wrote:
>
> M. Lucretius Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.
>
> I propose a 7 day voluntary moratorium on discussion of macronational
> politics and current global events other than topics related to
> natural disasters and humanitarian aid.
>






SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ> Fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA> The fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ>
Roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39600 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Ave, Cato amice; avete, omnes.

On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 01:12:43PM -0000, Gaius Equitius Cato wrote:
> C. Equitius Cato quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> I had posted my agreement to the idea of a moratorium when something
> struck me after re-reading several posts.
>
> Are we indeed an on-line Yahoo! Group dedicated to studying Roman
> history --- or are we a living Roman community?
>
> The difference is important.

[ snip ]

> Then I had to think, "Well, what if the discussions I've had about
> legal issues are as uninteresting to other citizens as these are to
> me? Should I have been muzzled?" (NO COMMENTS PLEASE)

[ sounds of comments being strangles a-borning ensue :) ]

[ snip ]

> When a citizen is told to "take it to another List", we are
> essentially saying, "what you are interested in talking about is
> either not interesting to or not appropriate for the public". But
> this is the Forum; the only way, for many of our citizens, to ever
> interact with each other. Religion, politics, and sex --- the three
> things which we are told NEVER to discuss with people we don't know
> --- are a part of the life of a community.
>
>
> So, which do we value more? Freedom of speech, or "freedom" from
> being offended by another citizen's views, no matter how ridiculous,
> unimportant, or outlandish one might think they are?

Amice, the question of free speech addresses only one side of the
equation. There's also the necessity of considering other people's time,
annoyance at finding a mailbox packed with off-topic posts, and - for
some people out there - the "pleasure" of paying for downloading content
for which they are not interested. It is a question of asking people to
"pay" for someone else's exercise of freedom on unequal terms. Let me go
into a little history to explain what I mean.

The problem of our Forum mirrors exactly the problems of USENET groups.
As strongly as I stand for freedom of speech - and I know few people
more apt to bridle at anything resembling any attack on it than myself -
Net group discussions *must* be moderated; experience with thousands of
groups (groups.google.com lists 54193 of them at this time) tells us so
in unequivocal terms.

USENET, for those unfamiliar with the term, was the traditional method
of forming interest-based Internet discussion groups. There was no Yahoo
with its restrictive policies and its pernicious info-collection
business model and its insistence on pasting their spam at the end of
every post, nor any entity that forced its requirements on the people
who signed up to use it: USENET was open to all, and as long as you had
the proper "client" (a program that allowed you to read it), you could
subscribe to the groups that piqued your interest and read them at your
leisure.

These days, USENET still exists - and is mostly a wasteland, swamped
with spam, flames (gratuitous attacks on posters), and trolls (the
attackers.) The only groups that have survived - and some important ones
have, to be sure - are all moderated and maintain some sort of basic
entry requirements. *THIS* is the primary reason that USENET is
essentially dead and YahooGroups flourish: Yahoo caught on to the fact
that groups *must* be moderated and restricted to explicitly-vetted
membership.

You see, the concept of free speech works well in communities where
there's _negative feedback_ - an engineering principle which states that
there must be controls on the amplitude of the input, without which any
system will go into runaway mode (the most familiar example, for most
people, is the "feedback" howl of an amplifier where the microphone gain
is turned up too high). There are social controls that can be applied in
"real" life, controls which mitigate the effects of e.g., a person
screaming during a meeting and interrupting it; that person can be
simply "walked" out of the room by a couple of concerned members. No
such ability exists on an open list in which the only rule is "freedom
of speech". So, USENET is in the last stages of its existence.

You see, there's another rule that applies here: it's called "The
Tragedy of the Commons". It states that, in the case of a common
resource for which no one holds a specific responsibility, there's a
maximum incentive to *use* that resource but not to *maintain* it. That
is, everyone wants the maximum benefit out of that resource - but no one
wants to pay the costs associated with the maintenance. USENET was such
a resource, and the results that followed could have been scripted from
the beginning.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

As to the specific problem of the Forum: I honestly don't know what the
right answer is. You see, my answer to the above is _not_ that all
freedom of speech must be curtailed, nor that every post must be vetted
with a microscope - but it's not complete and utter license, either.
There *must* be restrictions in place to prevent runaway mode - but
those restrictions must be tempered with justice and wisdom. Which is, I
believe, the way our spiritual ancestors handled it - at least to the
best of their abilities. Rules for the given moment, to be enforced as
necessary, and to be changed or forgotten at the next occasion of need.

Perhaps a private note from the Praetores to those who _initiate_ those
discussions, progressing up the scale as the offenses are repeated?
Intelligently applied, this would bypass (say) announcements of great
macronational celebrations or (let us hope not) disasters, but would
stop, in short order, the most undesirable varieties of macronational
wrangling. Yes, it does - unfortunately - impose a somewhat greater
workload on our Praetores (perhaps we need more of them?) Yes, there's
potential for misuse - as always. However, I choose to believe that a
policy like this _would_ be wisely applied - since we ourselves have
chosen our Praetores, we might as well put our trust in their
competence.

Again, I don't know. But it seems to me to be a possible approach to a
solution - and if anyone has a better one, then please do speak up. A
monotone Nova Roma all marching in step is not something I find
desirable, but I would be greatly relieved and pleased if this Forum
concentrated on Roma - Nova or Antiqua - as its main topic of
discussion.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Dubitando ad veritatem venimus.
We arrive at the truth being sceptical.
-- Pierre Ab�lard, "Sic et non?"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39601 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: I said I was sorry.
With all the debates Ive initiated I get moderated for
a friendly passing of a police-list post.It was
designed to point out human behavior not to offend.Vale

S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39602 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Violations of the Praetorian Edictum ?
Salve Gn. Equitius Marinus, has said in part

"It is. I ask the praetors to place Fides on moderation until such time
as he demonstrates that he understands the praetorian edictum concerning
posting to the mainlist.

No he is not. From the Praetorian Edictum, the list guidelines

XI. Topics of Discussion.
"The main focus of this list is Nova Roma and Roma Antiqua. However, as members of a diverse international community we all have lives and interests outside of Nova Roma. It is perfectly acceptable to discuss non-Roman topics here, though keep in mind that not everyone may share your interest in these topics."

Censor you may not like his posts, you may not like mine or the post of others but not one person in the current ongoing discussion on macronational stuff has call anybody else any names, used profane language or implied that their mothers wear combat boot. : ) .

Could you please show me what section of the Praetorian Edictum he has violated with his postings?

There are 1133 subscribers to the Forum ( main list) if anyone of them does not like the current discussion please start another one.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus









[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39603 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
C. Equitius Cato S. Apollono Scipioni M. Lucretio Agricolae
quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Apollonius Scipio, I absolutely understand your frustration; and
(without assuming anything about your own reading comprehension of
English) I recognize that it may be just that more difficult for our
citizens whose first language is *not* English. Those of us whose
native language is English can generally glance at a post and get its
general meaning very quickly, so we can simply click "Next Message"
and be done with it if it is not of interest to us.

Agricole, I agree that it might have been better for those involved in
the discussion of U.S. politics &c. to have taken it "private" at some
point; I just want to make it clear that it is our right to speak as
long as we like in the Forum on any topic we like, no matter how
excruciatingly dull or uninteresting others might find it.


Now, I'd like to bring up the subject of changing the *type* of Forum
we have again. After looking at the discussion about a seperate List
for North Americans, I played around on the web and created this:

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
DISCLAIMER: THIS IS ABSOLUTELY *NOT* OFFICIAL OR REFLECTIVE OF ANY
PART OF NOVA ROMA, ITS GOVERNMENT, MAGISTRATES, OR PEOPLE WHATSOEVER
--- IT IS *ONLY* A "TEST"
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


http://www.armleg.com/forum/novaromanortham.html


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
DISCLAIMER: THIS IS ABSOLUTELY *NOT* OFFICIAL OR REFLECTIVE OF ANY
PART OF NOVA ROMA, ITS GOVERNMENT, MAGISTRATES, OR PEOPLE WHATSOEVER
--- IT IS *ONLY* A "TEST"
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



Look at it, play around in it, see if you like it. Its advantages
should become quite clear very quickly, among them:

1. You only need to read the threads regarding the subjects that
interest you, thereby mitigating the pain of being "forced" to read
about things you don't care about; and
2. All the various parts of Nova Roman life can be at the same
starting point --- there can be seperate "topics" for Law, Religion,
Politics, Cooking &c., but all accessible from the same starting page.


Something to think about.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39604 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Happy Holidays, till we speak again.
I appologize to ALL if Ive ever offended.As per my
FAREWELL post I will concentrate my time on preparing
to serve.I AM NOT RESIGNING.I love you all.Be well.

S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39605 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: David Meadows' explorator 8.30
Salve Romans

FYI

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus



================================================================
explorator 8.30 November 20, 2005
================================================================

================================================================
ANCIENT GREECE AND ROME (AND CLASSICS)
================================================================
Some coverage of the discovery of an ancient map of the 'heel' of
Italy's boot:

http://tinyurl.com/dgs2a<about:blank> (LA Times)
http://tinyurl.com/8n6dj<about:blank> (Italian)
http://tinyurl.com/9ulp4<about:blank> (Telegraph ... photo)

Remains of a Roman village have been uncovered in Sardinia:

http://www.sardegnaogginews.it/notizie.php?notizia=6679<about:blank> (Italian)

An ivory statue of Septimius Severus or Marcus Aurelius was
found in the Forum this week:

http://tinyurl.com/c3bfs<about:blank> (ANSA)

Roman glass in a Chinese tomb:

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-11/20/content_3806614.htm<about:blank>

.. while plans are afoot to seek connections between Rome and
India:

http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=81950<about:blank>

.. and to excavate the Roman theatre at Tiberias:

http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=645353<about:blank>
(Hebrew)

The campaign to save Allianoi continues:

http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=28419<about:blank>

A sort of followup to that Roman wall collapse story from a
couple of weeks ago:

http://tinyurl.com/c8872<about:blank> (Telegraph)

The latest tidbit in the Elgin/Parthenon Marbles saga:

http://tinyurl.com/drb3f<about:blank> (Kathimerini)

Greek and Latin alive and well in Thurmont:

http://tinyurl.com/cnzks<about:blank> (Baltimore Sun)

Coverage of the Maine Junior Classical League convention:

http://morningsentinel.mainetoday.com/news/local/2161234.shtml<about:blank>

An Iliathon at Colgate:

http://tinyurl.com/7rwy2<about:blank> (CUN)

German archaeologists want to continue digging at Troy:

http://www.zaman.com/?bl=culture&alt=&trh=20051114&hn=26381<about:blank>

OpEd sort of thing on Trajan's campaigns in Mesopotamia:

http://tinyurl.com/blqet<about:blank> (American Muslim)

Somewhat touristy thing on the Pantheon:

http://travel2.nytimes.com/2005/11/20/travel/20pantheon.html<about:blank>

A piece on the accuracy of 'Rome':

http://theedge.bostonherald.com/tvNews/view.bg?articleid=113001<about:blank>

Jonathan Shay continues to lecture on wars and their effects
on soldiers, ancient and modern:

http://tinyurl.com/97zhz<about:blank> (DI)

Eva Braan is one of the recipients of a National Humanities
Medal:

http://www.collegenews.org/x5062.xml<about:blank>

An Marilyn Bisch has received Post-Secondary Teacher of the Year
honours:

http://tinyurl.com/c8se7<about:blank> (Statesman)

A budding Classicist:

http://tinyurl.com/areoq<about:blank> (NWI Times)

Repeat of that Linear A and B find on Crete story:

http://tinyurl.com/dmqo4<about:blank> (News 24)

Harold Edgeworth Butler, *Post-Augustan Poetry From Seneca to
Juvenal*:

http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext05/7pagp10.txt<about:blank>

Another review of Bettany Hughes' *Helen of Troy ...*:

http://tinyurl.com/cmyao<about:blank> (Independent)

Recent reviews from BMCR:

http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/recent.html<about:blank>

Recent reviews from Scholia:

http://www.classics.und.ac.za/reviews/2006.htm<about:blank>

Visit our blog:

http://www.atrium-media.com/rogueclassicism<about:blank>

To send a 'heads up' to the editor or contact him for other
reasons, reply to this message.
================================================================
Explorator is Copyright (c) 2005 David Meadows. Feel free to
distribute these listings via email to your pals, students,
teachers, etc., but please include this copyright notice. These
links are not to be posted to any website by any means (whether
by direct posting or snagging from a usenet group or some other
email source) without my express written permission. I think it
is only right that I be made aware of public fora which are
making use of content gathered in Explorator. Thanks!
================================================================




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39606 From: lucius_fidelius Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Farewell
Salvete Omnes.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Benjamin A. Okopnik" <ben@l...
wrote:
> Amice, weren't you the one who said "can we please get back to
> discussing Roma", or something of the sort? Repeatedly, in fact?

Nothing like a post that starts thusly and proceeds to dig deep into
American politics that has absolutely nothing to do with Roma.

And I also requote some words of wisdom that bear repeating...

On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 07:44:40AM -0500, Sensei Phil Perez wrote:
Salvete omnes,

> A real Roman departs our midst to do what real Romans have always
> done: To fight Barbarians! The rest of us can continue to sit here
> in the forum and talk all the nonsense we want. Our rights to do so
> protected by young men like Flavius. Yes, even those of us who do
> not live in the USA.

To quote such a thing while saying:

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Benjamin A. Okopnik" <ben@l...
wrote:
> Neither Bush nor any of his cronies have served in combat - and yet,
> they scream for young men to serve their ends and die for them. I
> find their endless lies to be nothing more than filthy distortions,
> designed ... [blah blah blah]

Ay caramba! Talk about parasitic posts! An involved and posting (and
tax-paying) member expresses his sense of resignation about Nova Roma
and someone has to make an unneccessary and vulgar
attempt to push a liberal agenda. And this in the face of great civil
service to the call of freedom and democratic rights.

On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:10:48AM -0800, raymond fuentes wrote:
> I fight a losing battle with the left everyday as a
> policeman and I am miserable doing it.I am more
> comfortable fighting amongst the right...I fear for
> the West

And there are many here that have a deep respect for that. As you may
do service to political agendas that may not be your own, so do you
protect and defend those less than deserving. It's the noble ones
that don't make distinctions and I support you greatly in your
efforts, especially that which sees beyond the petty and misguided.

Vale Marcvs Flavivs Fides!

et Valete Omnes,

L. Fidelius Graecus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Benjamin A. Okopnik" <ben@l...
wrote:
>

???!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39607 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
---

Salvete Omnes:

I would like to clarify my position as Equitius Cato seems to be,
perhaps due to his quick reading of what I said, misrepresenting me
in his post below:

In message 39583,I stated that I thought said poster's multiple
offerings to yesterday's list were 'macronational, marginally
related (if you use your imagination) Roman themes, which would have
perhaps been shared with a professional socialworker, therapist or
in private to a citizen...."

To this point I didn't ask for him to be 'muzzled' in a legal
manner, for his posts, as is implied below by Equitius Cato. I
simply do not enjoy the lack of Roman content. My 'freedom of
speech' being utilized as opposed to asking for legal venues against
him. Obviously others do not as well.

I said nothing in response to his posts on the ML yesterday until
a moratorium was suggested and I am in agreement in principle with
this measure....but I'm not willing to be misrepresented by a fellow
magistrate, who is disagreeing with a position he is not viewing
correctly.

I *did* continue to say in 39583 "But the post below is totally
unacceptable". This is what I asked to have muzzled, Equitius Cato.

His bumper sticker joke violates Yahoo Terms of Service, and we
are subject to macronational laws here as per our NR consitution.

The next time, the same joke could have the punchline showing a Star
of David on the Bumpersticker, a Pentagram, whatever...doesn't
matter... it would 'still' be against Yahoo Terms of Service.

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms

To me this kind of stuff is indeed totally unacceptable and in my
opinion it merits moderation and he should know better.

If you wish to martyr him, this is fine. I will not.

Pompeia





In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> (snippage)


> where we meet together and speak and interact. Where do we draw
the
> line at what is, as Senatrix Minucia-Tiberia Strabo has called it,
> "marginally-related"? What can be considered marginal to a place
> where citizens gather with each other to speak? Aside from the
> generally-accepted level of civility --- which (truth be told)
would
> never have been applied in the Forum of ancient Rome, and which we
> suffer solely because it is a requirement of the Yahoo! standards -
--
> what we have witnessed is simply the interaction of citizens in a
> public space in a free society.
>
> When I read these posts, I was tempted to agree with the senatrix
and
> I certainly understand her reasoning.
>
> Then I had to think, "Well, what if the discussions I've had about
> legal issues are as uninteresting to other citizens as these are to
> me? Should I have been muzzled?" (NO COMMENTS PLEASE) What line
does
> one draw determining the level of interest (or lack thereof)
necessary
> for a topic to be considered important --- or dismissed
as "marginal"?
>
> Apollonius Cordus and others have voiced issues with
> "Americanocentrism" in this Forum --- and these are understandable
as
> well; I agree that the Forum is not simply the default "American
> List", as it were. However, the role that the United States plays
in
> the world around us is of such immediacy, and has such
repercussions
> on every nation in every corner of the globe, that to pretend that
> these actions (and their political and philosophical ramifications)
> are marginal to the existence of anyone on the planet is an
> unsupportable idea. It is simply a fact, and trying to pretend it
> does not exist is the equivalent of trying to ignore the elephant
in
> the room because you're not interested in (or don't like)
elephants.
> Yes, yes, I know --- everybody's tired of hearing about the United
> States. Imagine how the Egyptians felt about Rome.
>
> When a citizen is told to "take it to another List", we are
> essentially saying, "what you are interested in talking about is
> either not interesting to or not appropriate for the public". But
> this is the Forum; the only way, for many of our citizens, to ever
> interact with each other. Religion, politics, and sex --- the
three
> things which we are told NEVER to discuss with people we don't know
> --- are a part of the life of a community.
>
>
> So, which do we value more? Freedom of speech, or "freedom" from
> being offended by another citizen's views, no matter how
ridiculous,
> unimportant, or outlandish one might think they are?
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39608 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Violations of the Praetorian Edictum ?
---Salvete Galerius Quaestor et Omnes:

We have a constitutional obligation to macronational laws and to the
Yahoo Terms of Service. These supercede or lend specific definition
to our guidelines...defining what is 'ok and offtopic' and what
is 'unacceptable and offtopic. We have no choice in the matter,
really in some situations.

http://doc.yahoo.com/info/terms

Pompeia



In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Timothy P. Gallagher" <spqr753@m...>
wrote:
>
>
> Salve Gn. Equitius Marinus, has said in part
>
> "It is. I ask the praetors to place Fides on moderation until
such time
> as he demonstrates that he understands the praetorian edictum
concerning
> posting to the mainlist.
>
> No he is not. From the Praetorian Edictum, the list guidelines
>
> XI. Topics of Discussion.
> "The main focus of this list is Nova Roma and Roma Antiqua.
However, as members of a diverse international community we all have
lives and interests outside of Nova Roma. It is perfectly acceptable
to discuss non-Roman topics here, though keep in mind that not
everyone may share your interest in these topics."
>
> Censor you may not like his posts, you may not like mine or the
post of others but not one person in the current ongoing discussion
on macronational stuff has call anybody else any names, used profane
language or implied that their mothers wear combat boot. : ) .
>
> Could you please show me what section of the Praetorian Edictum he
has violated with his postings?
>
> There are 1133 subscribers to the Forum ( main list) if anyone of
them does not like the current discussion please start another one.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39609 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve Scaevola,

My reply to you was sent of-list but since you insist on countering publicly and only using tiny bits of it out of context it is only fair that everyone see what exactly you responded to in its entirety. Those of you who have had enough of this discussion you know what to do - press the delete button and move on ;-)

Hi Ben,

I don't have time to counter each and everyone of your erroneous views right
now. All I can say quickly is that if you were to read the things that were
written by the press about Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War it would
astound you at how similar the charges hurled at him by the mainstream press
of his day were. Almost word for word except take the word oil and replace
it with the word cotton. Everyone "knew" that he was at war in order to
protect the interests of the northern industrialists. And of course, how
could those niggers ever be counted on to learn democracy. The same was said
of the Japanese, how could those Emperor worshiping gooks learn democracy.
Why don't you just use the words "diaper heads" I have never seen such much
underlying racism from someone so well educated since George Orwell promoted
eugenics.

I can only judge people by the things they do and say (especially what they
do). President Bush has not lied (yet). I may disagree with him on NAFTA,
CAFTA, immigration policy and all the pork the Republican Congress has
dished out but I cannot say he has lied yet. I do agree that I would have
run the war differently myself, many mistakes have been made. Name a war
where no mistakes were made? I personally would have been more like Gaius
Iulius Caesar, I would have gone in and had anybody who had anything to do
with the Hussein regime hung by their balls upside down in public. I am not
PC ;-) The Arab mentality certainly respects power and the more strongly it
is used, the more they seem to respect it. Then again that would have been
replacing one tyrant with another, so I'm glad I'm not the one calling the
shots, posterity would not have liked my decisions.

It was - again - the Democrats, and the media who made a mess out of
Vietnam. Nixon tried but he got clobbered for something that every Democrat
has gotten away with before then. Kennedy stole his election from Nixon in
1960 with the help of Chicago's Daly. More dead people voted in that
election in Cook County than had died that year there. Yet Nixon did not do
what Gore did! There has never been a more spectacular voter fraud situation
in US presidential election history than that one.

In regards to teaching techniques that can hurt people (The School of the
Americas). I teach highly sophisticated techniques that can maim, kill and
cause a hell of a lot of pain in a very efficient manner myself. I am very
careful with whom I share it but I can not be held responsible if it is
abused. Knowledge in itself is never "bad", it is how it is used that can
make it so. Guns aren't inherently "bad", people who use them in the wrong
way are. Knowledge of torture techniques are not "bad" in and of itself.
Information, even with the best of intentions can be used for evil purposes.

I guess we will have to agree that we disagree, thanks for not being
disagreeable, my friend. Lets put this one to bed. Yes I would rather learn
about Rome, I just can't sit back and let anti-Bush / anti American talk go
unanswered. Don't forget that we are at war. The New York Times and the
American media did not support our entry into WWII until AFTER Hitler
invaded the Soviet Union, we all know where their loyalties lay and still
lay - anywhere but with the USA.

Your buddy I hope,
Phil

----- Original Message -----
From: "Benjamin A. Okopnik" <ben@...>
To: "Sensei Phil Perez" <senseiphil@...>
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: my reply


> Salve, Amice -
>
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 02:02:07PM -0500, Sensei Phil Perez wrote:
> > Salve Ben,
> >
> > Where can begin. I know the president personally and although he may
have
> > faults, one of them is definitely not lying.
>
> Amice, I'm sure you know him personally - but to claim that you know him
> so intimately that you *know* he wouldn't lie is claiming too much. None
> of us know a man's soul to that degree - especially when he has an
> opportunity to make the kind of money that most _countries_ will never
> see.
>
> > I fought in Vietnam with the 101
> > and I know it was a mistake to pull out the way we did.
>
> I agree completely. However, my perception - and in this, *any* military
> strategist would agree (are you familiar with Hack, i.e. Col. David
> Hackworth? Take a look at http://www.hackworth.com/ - although he died
> recently of cancer caused by Agent Orange, his words and his reputation
> live on) - is that the way we pulled out of 'Nam, essentially with our
> tails between our legs, was NOT due to our soldiers - the finest on
> earth! - but due to the lying scum politicians who destroyed their
> ability to fight. Today, I see the Republican party doing that, and I
> despise them for it. They have sent our soldiers there without equipment,
> without authority, *without a defined mission* - and I *guarantee you*
> that they're going to blame the horrendous failure of Iraq on those
> soldiers. This is a long-term bet, but I'd be willing to put up
> everything I own on it.
>
> This is another Vietnam, and the results will be the same. Mangled
> soldiers, scummy politicians becoming filthy-rich on war contracts, and
> us getting whipped out of the country like dogs. Believe it.
>
> > I also know that what
> > we are doing today is also correct. Yes, our borders could be much
better
> > secured but just the same since our boys are drawing the fire over there
the
> > enemy seems content to keep their vile scum there as well.
>
> And the answer is to remove our boys from there. Interdict terrorists by
> killing off their sources of financial supply - e.g., those very
> companies in Boston owned by the bin Laden family that Bush scrambled to
> protect after 9/11! - but never, *never* fight a ground war against
> terrorists. They're not there to be fought against - it's like fighting
> a ground war against a fog. It's like fighting a ground war against
> rain.
>
> > It surprises me that you feel this way considering where you came from.
Let me
> > remind you that the very same people who are today vilifying the
president and
> > his policies are the very same bunch who admired, no, LOVED Stalin and
his
> > policies and to this day deny that he killed millions of his own people
just
> > like Saddam Hussein did.
>
> Let's draw a distinction here: there are
Republicans/Democrats/liberals/nazis/
> whatever, of every stripe, who share one or more of my beliefs. I have
> NO responsibility for anything else they may believe in, since their
> sharing of a specific belief of mine does not mean that I share any of
> the rest of theirs.
>
> People who deny basic history... well, you can figure out what I think
> about them.
>
> > It was wrong to turn a blind eye then and it would be
> > wrong to turn it now. If oil is the reason for this war how come we get
80
> > percent of it from Canada, Venezuela and Mexico?
>
> Where, exactly, are you getting those figures? You may have
> misunderstood the statistic that says "80% of the oil that we use for
> _utility_ power comes from, etc.", but utility power is itself only a
> small slice of the oil we use.
>
> According to the US Navy
(http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=20212):
> "About 25 percent of oil used in the US comes from the Gulf Coast".
>
> From the Ways and Means Committee (Congress):
> "Today, the U.S. imports 19.1 million barrels of foreign oil per day and
> the U.S. Department of Energy reports that net imports of petroleum in
> the year 2001 will account for 54 percent of total U.S. petroleum demand
> an increase of 18 percentage points from 1973."
>
> In a recent speech, Bush mentioned that "almost 60% of our oil comes
> from foreign sources."
>
> However, if even _10%_ of our oil came from the Middle East, that's
>
> 19.1 * 10^6 / 54 * 100 / 10 = 3537037 barrels per day. At $55 per barrel
> (recent average price), that's 194 *million* 537 thousand and 37 dollars
> *every* *single* *day*.
>
> If you don't think that this kind of money would tempt Bush - an oilman
> at heart - then I can't see any argument that would make any sense, to
> either one of us.
>
> > How quickly you forget that WE
> > were attacked.
>
> But NOT by Iraqis. Perhaps you've forgotten? It was the Saudis - those
> excellent economic partners and friends of the Bush family. How did
> _that_ bit of info get lost in the noise?
>
> > Saddam was on the verge of ending UN restrictions. have you only
> > paid attention to the anti-Bush crowd, have you not paid attention to
the UN
> > scandal unfolding about OIL & MONEY!!! These were the people who were
defending
> > Saddam. If they had gotten their way he would no doubt be supplying Al
Qaeda
> > with everything the could want and more.
>
> Not that this is a "coulda happened" - as opposed to our people dying
> today, and billions of our dollars being thrown away today. That's the
> reality. The other is conjecture without proof.
>
> > Have you not seen the photos of the wingless 707 used for training
terrorists
> > in Iraq? I sincerely hope that you never get your wish because if the
Democrats
> > take over and chances are they will and soon, since sensible people like
you
> > have been convinced that they are right and the republicans are wrong
watch
> > out, the gulags you left behind will seem like paradise compared to what
will
> > come our way.
>
> Like the Gulag at Gitmo? I've already seen it.
>
> > Any schoolboy can tell you that a bully must be confronted not appeased.
>
> As will I - word for word.
>
> > Bush
> > was totally correct in taking the war over there and in changing the
overall
> > picture of middle east politics. Do you really think the Iraqis would
prefer to
> > have Saddam back? Do the Russians want the Soviet system back as well?
>
> We've never asked the Iraqis what they want. They don't understand,
> *can't* understand what democracy is - their environment is not in any
> way conducive to it and cannot accomodate it. All we've done is kill
> them, civilians and their soldiers alike. Without distinction between
> the two, it becomes murder - plain and simple.
>
>
> Optime vale,
> * Ben Okopnik * Editor-in-Chief, Linux Gazette * http://linuxgazette.net *
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/175 - Release Date: 11/18/2005
>
>

----- Original Message -----
From: Benjamin A. Okopnik
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Farewell...


Salve, Marce Cassi -

On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 02:31:32PM -0500, Sensei Phil Perez wrote:
> Salve Scaevola,
>
> President Bush has the only qualification necessary to send US troops
> into combat. He is the elected president of the USA.

I must admit to being surprised, amice; much more so if it had been
anyone but you making this statement. Does this mean that your martial
arts students become "qualified" to beat up little old ladies and take
their wallets? Or is there perhaps a *moral* dimension to being strong,
a duty that is an inextricable concomitant of that strength? How,
exactly, do you define honorable behavior?

I'll quote a USENET poster with whom I agree on the subject. Perhaps you
will find a few points here with which you agree with, as well.

``
Honor is about being strong, and controling that strength for the benefit
of others. It's about being worthy of being trusted. It's about having
rules that mean that, even though you have the ability to hurt people, you
choose not to hurt people, as much as you possibly can.

It's about letting what you say be true, and making sure that what you
promise happens. It's about living up to your word. It's about
protecting those in your care. It's about letting one's gentleness temper
one's capacity for violence, and about only letting violence happen in the
service of gentleness.

It's about believing that there's something more important than your own
personal immediate comfort.

-- Xiphias Gladius
''

> Who would you
> prefer to make this decision, the New York Times editorial board?

If they are qualified by their combat, educational, and political
experience, certainly. Otherwise, no.

> He
> served honorably as a fighter pilot and had some unspoken about
> missions that put in harms way near Cuba and her airspace. The fact
> that his unit was not called into action in Vietnam was not of his
> making. He was ready to go if asked.

I'm afraid that's incorrect. Bush lied about his service record; there's
no such thing as "unspoken about missions" that long after the fact,
other than as a vague excuse propagated by his propaganda machine. It's
the standard Bush-and-Rove tactic of claiming unprovable evidence that
can't be revealed because of National security or terrorists.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=George_W._Bush's_military_service/External_Links_2004
(shortcut link: http://tinyurl.com/dflzm )

> Kerry on the other hand selected
> his duty specifically because when he picked it the swift boats were
> strictly used off shore where an encounter with the enemy was unheard
> of.

[blink] I gather Kerry was his own commander when he "chose" his
mission? Interesting.

> It was his bad luck that they changed the sorties to in-country
> river patrols. Then he made damn sure to get out in only three months
> by using scratches as "battle wounds".

All of the above is, of course, extremely biased language that does not
represent the truth in the slightest but instead distorts it in the way
that you claim media distort Bush's claims. I'll be happy to answer it
if and when it's presented in a manner that reflects reality.

> I don't blame you for some of
> you feelings, the media is so biased it's a wonder anyone knows
> anything any more -

I don't watch much TV, Marce Cassi, whether liberal- or
conservative-biased. I do my own research - mostly based on the reports
of the people who were there for the action, or reports from sources as
unbiased as I can determine based on my own judgement. I'm one of those
folks the politicians of all stripes fear worse than death: I'm a man
who uses the means of *direct* sources of information, available via the
Internet and unstoppable and uncontrollable by any political machine.
I've been on the Net since the early days - before it _was_ the Net -
and I _know_ why politicians are terrified of it. It spells the death of
their ability to distort, to hide, to obscure - and this is a source
that is becoming available to a large majority of the world. About to
become nearly universal, in fact:

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1116/p04s01-ussc.html?s=u

The media have caught on to this a long time ago; they do, after all,
deal in information. Many of the large media outlets have cleaned up
their acts - even Washington Post has been known to tell the anti-Bush
truth on occasion, these days, although Fox News remains the den of
lying idiots that it always was. The claim of "lying media", with the
exception of Fox and a vanishingly small number of others, is becoming
more and more /outre/ - more like fairy tales than reality, and would be
much, much better for proof than as a bald statement which proves
nothing.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Mea mihi conscientia pluris est quam omnium sermo.
My conscience means more to me than all speech.
-- Cicero, "Epistulae ad Atticum"


SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
Roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/175 - Release Date: 11/18/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39610 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Violations of the Praetorian Edictum ?
Salve Pompeia

Ok? But what has he said that is a violation of any set of rules?


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus





----- Original Message -----
From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia<mailto:pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 11:39 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Violations of the Praetorian Edictum ?


---Salvete Galerius Quaestor et Omnes:

We have a constitutional obligation to macronational laws and to the
Yahoo Terms of Service. These supercede or lend specific definition
to our guidelines...defining what is 'ok and offtopic' and what
is 'unacceptable and offtopic. We have no choice in the matter,
really in some situations.

http://doc.yahoo.com/info/terms<http://doc.yahoo.com/info/terms>

Pompeia



In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Timothy P. Gallagher" <spqr753@m...>
wrote:
>
>
> Salve Gn. Equitius Marinus, has said in part
>
> "It is. I ask the praetors to place Fides on moderation until
such time
> as he demonstrates that he understands the praetorian edictum
concerning
> posting to the mainlist.
>
> No he is not. From the Praetorian Edictum, the list guidelines
>
> XI. Topics of Discussion.
> "The main focus of this list is Nova Roma and Roma Antiqua.
However, as members of a diverse international community we all have
lives and interests outside of Nova Roma. It is perfectly acceptable
to discuss non-Roman topics here, though keep in mind that not
everyone may share your interest in these topics."
>
> Censor you may not like his posts, you may not like mine or the
post of others but not one person in the current ongoing discussion
on macronational stuff has call anybody else any names, used profane
language or implied that their mothers wear combat boot. : ) .
>
> Could you please show me what section of the Praetorian Edictum he
has violated with his postings?
>
> There are 1133 subscribers to the Forum ( main list) if anyone of
them does not like the current discussion please start another one.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ> Fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA> The fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ>
Roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39611 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
AGREED
----- Original Message -----
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 10:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] MORATORIUM PROPOSAL


Salve Agricola,

A fine proposal. I hope the citizenry at large will accept it.

Vale,

-- Marinus

M. Lucretius Agricola wrote:

> M. Lucretius Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.
>
> I propose a 7 day voluntary moratorium on discussion of macronational
> politics and current global events other than topics related to
> natural disasters and humanitarian aid.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/175 - Release Date: 11/18/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39612 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
Salve Tiberia,

Ever heard of a delete button? Maybe we don't want to read your rant either. It seems that you only post to complain about someone else's posts. Just pretend you're on the street and just walk away. Or do you walk up to people you overhear and complain to them as well? It seems that Flavius has touched a raw nerve here. Could it be you he is talking about in the story? I never would have guessed until you brought it up ;-)

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 1:45 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: (fwd) Tailgater


---CENSORES ET PRAETORES SAL.

What the heck has this latest offering of Flavius Fides below have
to do with anything Roman?

Flavius Fides has tied up the entire mainlist with macronational,
marginally-related (if you use your imagination) Roman themes, which
perhaps would have best been shared with a professional social
worker, therapist, or in private to a citizen who is willing to
listen and help him brainstorm solutions.

I'm always willing to listen.

This post below is totally unacceptable.

I refuse to accept the steroptype 'Ned Flanders' reputation that is
randomly assigned to persons with the mentality attracted by The
Simpsons. For myself and for others. Especially by Flavius
Fides...judging by his posts today....

Especially in a Nova Roma forum where I am constitutionally entitled
to be subject to the macronational laws of my birth country...(no
unsubstantiated hate stuff assigned to groups of people
posted/published en mass) and where I am theoretically entitled
also to forums which are reasonably moderated to maintain civility.

Please, I ask you Honoured Censores/Praetores either by means of
morality or legality....whatever device....address this behaviour.

This is NOT usenet,or a rap battle board. I don't care if Fides
likes me or not. I'm almost glad he might not. Nonetheless, he is
vandalizing the forum today, with stuff that has little usefulness
in terms of Roman/NovaRoma conflict.


Thanks et valete,
Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@y...>
wrote:
>
> A story Id like to share...
> --- aronson@p... <aronson@p...> wrote:
> > The Tailgater
> >
> > An honest man was being tailgated by a stressed out
> woman on a busy
> > boulevard. Suddenly, the light turned yellow, just
> in front of him.
> >
> > He did the right thing, stopping at the crosswalk,
> even though he
> > could have beaten the red light by accelerating
> through the
> > intersection.
> >
> > The tailgating woman hit the roof, and the horn,
> screaming in
> > frustration as she missed her chance to get through
> the intersection.
> > As she was still in mid-rant, she heard a tap on her
> window and looked
> > up into the face of a very serious police officer.
> The officer ordered
> > her to exit her car with her hands up. He took her
> to the police
> > station where she was searched, finger printed,
> photographed and
> > placed in a holding cell.
> >
> > After a couple of hours, a policeman approached the
> cell and opened
> > the door. She was escorted back to the booking desk
> where the
> > arresting officer was waiting with her personal
> effects.
> >
> > He said, "I'm very sorry for this mistake. You see,
> I pulled up behind
> > your car while you were blowing your horn, flipping
> off the guy in
> > front of you, and cussing a blue streak at him. "I
> noticed the 'Choose
> > Life' license plate holder, the 'What Would Jesus
> Do' bumper sticker,
> > the 'Follow Me to Sunday-School' bumper sticker, and
> the chrome-plated
> > Christian fish emblem on the trunk. Naturally, I
> assumed you had
> > stolen the car."
> >
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/175 - Release Date: 11/18/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39613 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
C. Equitius Cato P. Minuciae-Tiberiae Straboni quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Senatrix, I'm not sure exactly when or why this happened, but you seem
to have decided that every post I make in which I make any kind of
reference to you is a pointed personal attack against you, regardless
of context or content.

I said in my post that I agreed with you in general principle --- and
even that I understand your reasoning (meaning that I found it
reasonable) --- but that I was afraid that following that impulse
might lead us into more dangerous waters, with regards to our rights
as citizens, and I explained why.

You may agree with me or disagree with me. Enjoy. I have no qualms
about voicing my disagreement publicly with anyone if I disagree with
them. I welcome vigorous objective discussion. But please stop using
my name as a springboard for your emotional rambling. I do not care
to address this issue again, and I thank you in advance for not
providing me a reason to do so.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39614 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Salve Cato,

You have hit the nail on the head. When I am not interested in a post (conversation) I jus hit the delete button and move to the next. Like walking from one group conversing in the forum to another. I did yawn thought the legalese a few months ago but would perk up whenever the pie throwing started ;-) it was great fun to read (and not participate in).

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: gaiusequitiuscato
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 8:12 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL


C. Equitius Cato quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

I had posted my agreement to the idea of a moratorium when something
struck me after re-reading several posts.

Are we indeed an on-line Yahoo! Group dedicated to studying Roman
history --- or are we a living Roman community?

The difference is important.

If we are a group interested in Roman history (with a couple of jazzy
titles for our leaders), then we are basically the same as any number
of philosophical, historical, educational, religious, &c. groups one
can vist and/or join on the internet. A few interesting topics, a
nice (pseudo)scholarly debate, everyone smiling and very pleased at
how wonderful it is to be in such an erudite, like-minded bunch of web
users. Nothing too emotional, thank you, except in a distant kind of way.

If we are a Roman community, then we are far beyond that. The Forum
(the name I prefer to use for this, the so-called "Main List") is
where we meet together and speak and interact. Where do we draw the
line at what is, as Senatrix Minucia-Tiberia Strabo has called it,
"marginally-related"? What can be considered marginal to a place
where citizens gather with each other to speak? Aside from the
generally-accepted level of civility --- which (truth be told) would
never have been applied in the Forum of ancient Rome, and which we
suffer solely because it is a requirement of the Yahoo! standards ---
what we have witnessed is simply the interaction of citizens in a
public space in a free society.

When I read these posts, I was tempted to agree with the senatrix and
I certainly understand her reasoning.

Then I had to think, "Well, what if the discussions I've had about
legal issues are as uninteresting to other citizens as these are to
me? Should I have been muzzled?" (NO COMMENTS PLEASE) What line does
one draw determining the level of interest (or lack thereof) necessary
for a topic to be considered important --- or dismissed as "marginal"?

Apollonius Cordus and others have voiced issues with
"Americanocentrism" in this Forum --- and these are understandable as
well; I agree that the Forum is not simply the default "American
List", as it were. However, the role that the United States plays in
the world around us is of such immediacy, and has such repercussions
on every nation in every corner of the globe, that to pretend that
these actions (and their political and philosophical ramifications)
are marginal to the existence of anyone on the planet is an
unsupportable idea. It is simply a fact, and trying to pretend it
does not exist is the equivalent of trying to ignore the elephant in
the room because you're not interested in (or don't like) elephants.
Yes, yes, I know --- everybody's tired of hearing about the United
States. Imagine how the Egyptians felt about Rome.

When a citizen is told to "take it to another List", we are
essentially saying, "what you are interested in talking about is
either not interesting to or not appropriate for the public". But
this is the Forum; the only way, for many of our citizens, to ever
interact with each other. Religion, politics, and sex --- the three
things which we are told NEVER to discuss with people we don't know
--- are a part of the life of a community.


So, which do we value more? Freedom of speech, or "freedom" from
being offended by another citizen's views, no matter how ridiculous,
unimportant, or outlandish one might think they are?

Valete bene,

Cato









SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
Roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/175 - Release Date: 11/18/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39615 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Farewell
Salvete, omnes -

On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 03:30:02PM -0000, lucius_fidelius wrote:
> Salvete Omnes.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Benjamin A. Okopnik" <ben@l...
> wrote:
> > Amice, weren't you the one who said "can we please get back to
> > discussing Roma", or something of the sort? Repeatedly, in fact?
>
> Nothing like a post that starts thusly and proceeds to dig deep into
> American politics that has absolutely nothing to do with Roma.

[snip of continuation of a dead thread ]

Nothing like a post from someone who hasn't bothered to read the rest of
the discussion before jumping in and proceeds to stick his foot in his
mouth based on that. An excellent example of the kind of behavior that
I've described in my reasons for USENET becoming a swamp.

You've just earned a place in my kill-file for the next week or so. In
case you have no idea of what that means, any email from you will go
straight into the trash for the next week plus.

Have a nice day.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Longum iter est per praecepta, breve et efficax per exempla.
The way is made long through rules, but short and effective through examples.
-- Seneca Philosophus, "Epistulae"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39616 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Salvete omnes,


I would like to see the fat guy promoting Roman Bread in the Forum after delivering his "news" from his little pedestal. OOPS, do you all think I'm him? ;-)

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: M. Lucretius Agricola
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 8:31 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL


M. Lucretius Agricola C. Equitio Catoni S.P.D.

Indeed my friend, this is much more than a history discussion group.
Still, it is well when a single topic comes to dominate this forum,
when clear progress is not being made toward an end, for the
participants to voluntarily yield the space to other topics, even for
a short time.



Now while we are on the topic of this Forum, I have a request. Is
there any way that we could see here a kind of periodic newsletter in
which leaders of different groups and projects could give us a summary
of the activity in their groups for the past, say, month? Our
activites are spread out over so many lists that it is just not
possible to monitor everything that one might have a bit of interest
in. I mean just a few lines from each group, not an essay, not even a
full paragraph.


I assure you all that I have not got the time to take on something
like this now, but I would really love to see it. Surely there is a
citizen of a journalistic bent?




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> I had posted my agreement to the idea of a moratorium when something
> struck me after re-reading several posts.
>
> Are we indeed an on-line Yahoo! Group dedicated to studying Roman
> history --- or are we a living Roman community?
>
> The difference is important.
>
> If we are a group interested in Roman history (with a couple of jazzy
> titles for our leaders), then we are basically the same as any number
> of philosophical, historical, educational, religious, &c. groups one
> can vist and/or join on the internet. A few interesting topics, a
> nice (pseudo)scholarly debate, everyone smiling and very pleased at
> how wonderful it is to be in such an erudite, like-minded bunch of web
> users. Nothing too emotional, thank you, except in a distant kind
of way.
>
> If we are a Roman community, then we are far beyond that. The Forum
> (the name I prefer to use for this, the so-called "Main List") is
> where we meet together and speak and interact. Where do we draw the
> line at what is, as Senatrix Minucia-Tiberia Strabo has called it,
> "marginally-related"? What can be considered marginal to a place
> where citizens gather with each other to speak? Aside from the
> generally-accepted level of civility --- which (truth be told) would
> never have been applied in the Forum of ancient Rome, and which we
> suffer solely because it is a requirement of the Yahoo! standards ---
> what we have witnessed is simply the interaction of citizens in a
> public space in a free society.
>
> When I read these posts, I was tempted to agree with the senatrix and
> I certainly understand her reasoning.
>
> Then I had to think, "Well, what if the discussions I've had about
> legal issues are as uninteresting to other citizens as these are to
> me? Should I have been muzzled?" (NO COMMENTS PLEASE) What line does
> one draw determining the level of interest (or lack thereof) necessary
> for a topic to be considered important --- or dismissed as "marginal"?
>
> Apollonius Cordus and others have voiced issues with
> "Americanocentrism" in this Forum --- and these are understandable as
> well; I agree that the Forum is not simply the default "American
> List", as it were. However, the role that the United States plays in
> the world around us is of such immediacy, and has such repercussions
> on every nation in every corner of the globe, that to pretend that
> these actions (and their political and philosophical ramifications)
> are marginal to the existence of anyone on the planet is an
> unsupportable idea. It is simply a fact, and trying to pretend it
> does not exist is the equivalent of trying to ignore the elephant in
> the room because you're not interested in (or don't like) elephants.
> Yes, yes, I know --- everybody's tired of hearing about the United
> States. Imagine how the Egyptians felt about Rome.
>
> When a citizen is told to "take it to another List", we are
> essentially saying, "what you are interested in talking about is
> either not interesting to or not appropriate for the public". But
> this is the Forum; the only way, for many of our citizens, to ever
> interact with each other. Religion, politics, and sex --- the three
> things which we are told NEVER to discuss with people we don't know
> --- are a part of the life of a community.
>
>
> So, which do we value more? Freedom of speech, or "freedom" from
> being offended by another citizen's views, no matter how ridiculous,
> unimportant, or outlandish one might think they are?
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>






SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
Roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/175 - Release Date: 11/18/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39617 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Farewell...
Salve, Marce Cassi -

On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 11:46:32AM -0500, Sensei Phil Perez wrote:
> Salve Scaevola,
>
> My reply to you was sent of-list but since you insist on countering
> publicly and only using tiny bits of it out of context it is only fair
> that everyone see what exactly you responded to in its entirety. Those
> of you who have had enough of this discussion you know what to do -
> press the delete button and move on ;-)

[ snip ]

Perhaps we've crossed wires somewhere. I've just checked my "Sent mail"
box, and I don't see where I _ever_ forwarded a private email of yours
to NovaRoma; that would be completely against my own principles. If I
have done so unwittingly, you have my most sincere apologies - but I do
not see where I did so in anything you quoted below.

Perhaps you can enlighten me in regard to what you consider a private
email of yours that I forwarded to NR; at the moment, I'm completely
puzzled as to your claim. I've responded publicly to your posts that I
saw in NR, and I've responded privately to your emails.

Again, let me emphasize - if I have somehow forwarded one of your emails
here, it was done unintentionally and in error - and you have my most
sincere apologies.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39618 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Salvete Cato Omnesque,

> Apollonius Scipio, I absolutely understand your frustration; and
> (without assuming anything about your own reading comprehension of
> English) I recognize that it may be just that more difficult for our
> citizens whose first language is *not* English. Those of us whose

The problem is not about English. The problem is that, as a magistrate, I have to read
all the messages on the Forum.

I propose that any message that is not pertaining to the life of Nova Roma should have in
the subject field something like "OFF TOPIC" or "NOT NR" or whatever. With such a mark,
the author of the message clearly indicates that the post is not intended to NR as a
whole and that the contents are not binding.

Valete,



Sextus Apollonius Scipio

Propraetor Galliae



__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39619 From: FAC Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Fr. Apulus Caesar Consulis Quiritibus SPD

I hereby call for candidates to stand for election to the ordinary
magistracies of the Comitia Centuriata and the Comitia Populi
Tributa.
Anyone wishing to serve in any of these positions must have been a
citizen for at least six months by Kal. Ian. MMDCCLIX (January 1st,
2006) and be an assiduus (tax-paying) citizen. I will convene the
comitia for the elections at a later time, but candidates are
welcome to announce themselves and begin campaigning if they wish.

All candidates must let me know of their intention to stand for
office directly by sending a message to fraelov@... (fraelov AT
yahoo DOT it) in order to be placed on the ballot. Please include
the word "Candidate" in the subject of the message, and be sure to
tell me your full Roman name and the office you are pursuing.
Please, send me privatly your candidacy, I'll check everyday the
Main list but for your security send it at my address.

The candidacies will be accepted until December 3rd 2005 (8.00 PM,
Time of Rome).

The Res Publica is looking for candidacies for the following Offices:


1 CENSOR
----------
Must be at least 27 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2759 (January 1st,
2006). Must already have served at least six months as a consul,
praetor, aedilis, quaestor, tribunus plebis, magister aranearius
(formerly curator araneae), editor commentariorum (formerly curator
differum), rogator, or provincial governor. Must be assiduus.


2 CONSULS
----------
Must be at least 27 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2759 (January 1st,
2006). Must already have served at least six months as a consul,
praetor, aedilis, quaestor, tribunus plebis, magister aranearius
(formerly curator araneae), editor commentariorum (formerly curator
differum), rogator, or provincial governor. Must be assiduus.


2 PRAETORS
----------
Must be at least 25 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2759 (January 1st,
2006). Must already have served at least six months as a consul,
praetor, aedilis, quaestor, tribunus plebis, magister aranearius
(formerly curator araneae), editor commentariorum (formerly curator
differum), rogator, or provincial governor. Must be assiduus.ù


2 CURULE AEDILES
--------------------
Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2759 (January 1st,
2006). Must be assiduus.


8 QUAESTORES
--------------------
Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2759 (January 1st,
2006). Must be assiduus.


1 MAGISTER ARANEARIUS (webmaster)
----------------------------------------
Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2759 (January 1st,
2006). Must be assiduus.


1 EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM (newsletter editor)
--------------------------------------------------
Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2759 (January 1st,
2006). Must be assiduus.


2 ROGATORES
----------
Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2759 (January 1st,
2006). Must be assiduus.


4 DIRIBITORES
--------------------
Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2759 (January 1st,
2006). Must be assiduus.


2 CUSTODES
----------
Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2759 (January 1st,
2006). Must be assiduus.


Citizens considering the offices of Rogator, Diribitor, and Custode
should consult the text of the Lex Equitia de Vigintisexviris at
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2004-10-07-vi.html for
specific details.

I would invite all the Governors to inform the citizens living in
the own Provincia about the annual elections. Please, translate this
message in your mother-tongue and send it to you provincial mailing
list.
Your collaboration will be very appreciated.

Valete
Franciscus Apulus Caesar
Senior Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39620 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
---Salve Equitius Cato:

Well, I guess readers will not readily determine what you said and
didn't say, what I said and didn't say, because you didn't furnish
any text of the posts upon which you are basing this one. So, when
people look at this post in itself, it won't mean much, except to
see that you are accusing me of an emotional rant, without any basis
to substantiate why you are compelled to assign such a assessment.
In my opinion, it is *you* Equitius Cato, who is in danger of
appearing springboardesque, emotional and perhaps even silly...in
this post.

You agreed with me only in part, and implied that mainlist content
which is 'marginally acceptable' is what I thought should serve as a
yardstick for determining what should and should not be allowed on
this list. No.

Whether this was your intent or not, and I think I said as much that
you may have an inadvertent misunderstanding of my words, I will
clarify the meaning of what I wrote, so that any springboarding of
my posts is done on the basis of what I wrote, not what I didn't
write, what I did think, not what I didn't think.

Pompeia the Emotional :)




In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@y...>
wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato P. Minuciae-Tiberiae Straboni quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> Senatrix, I'm not sure exactly when or why this happened, but you
seem
> to have decided that every post I make in which I make any kind of
> reference to you is a pointed personal attack against you,
regardless
> of context or content.
>
> I said in my post that I agreed with you in general principle ---
and
> even that I understand your reasoning (meaning that I found it
> reasonable) --- but that I was afraid that following that impulse
> might lead us into more dangerous waters, with regards to our
rights
> as citizens, and I explained why.
>
> You may agree with me or disagree with me. Enjoy. I have no
qualms
> about voicing my disagreement publicly with anyone if I disagree
with
> them. I welcome vigorous objective discussion. But please stop
using
> my name as a springboard for your emotional rambling. I do not
care
> to address this issue again, and I thank you in advance for not
> providing me a reason to do so.
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39621 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
C. Equitius Cato S. Apollonio Scipioni quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

A very interesting idea; it might work. You are left with the
question open of exactly what is "off topic" for a citizen of the
Republic in the Republic's most common space.

Vale et valete bene,

Cato


> I propose that any message that is not pertaining to the life of
Nova Roma should have in
> the subject field something like "OFF TOPIC" or "NOT NR" or
whatever. With such a mark,
> the author of the message clearly indicates that the post is not
intended to NR as a
> whole and that the contents are not binding.
>
> Valete,
>
>
>
> Sextus Apollonius Scipio
>
> Propraetor Galliae
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
> http://farechase.yahoo.com
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39622 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Some Possible Solutions
Salvete Omnes,

I must admit that I tire quickly of some of these political discussions, and
it really makes me disinterested in following this list. But, I would never
want to hinder free speech, ever. In fact, I would volunteer my life to
protect everyone's right to speak freely. I've been thinking of possible
solutions to this problem of having freedom to talk about anything versus
keeping the discussions interesting/relevant to more than a select few.

Here's what I came up with:

- Separate list for each genre of topic
- A php based message board to accomodate different forums, which can
organize topics in an efficient manner (for example, you won't have to go
sifting through dozens of e-mails to find the one you're following, yet
you'd still have access to all of the messages), it also accomodates
avatars, so you have a face to the name you're talking to. Edicts, reports,
events, can also be posted and "stickied" to the top so as not to get lost
among discussions. (can you tell I like this one the best?)
- When a discussion dominates the mailing list and you are disinterested,
post a topic about something else and try to ignore the rest (the simplest
solution I can think of).
- When a topic is designated "American political" or "european political" or
"religious", etc, it could have this label on the subject line throughout
it's duration, and people who are disinterested can have their e-mail
program sort it out for them. For example, with Outlook express, a "message
rule" can be created so that any e-mail with the word "American Political"
in the subject line would automatically be sent to a folder marked "American
Political". This can be done with any subject label, but it would have to be
made standard. A standard set of topic labels.

Also, the only drawbacks to a php forum is that it takes up an incredible
amount of space and bandwidth, plus those who can't access the internet
won't be able to join in (since it's not e-mail based).


If I think of any more possibilities, I'll post them.

Valete,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39623 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
---
Salve Cassius Philippus et Salvete Omnes:

Very funny.

It 'seems' that you might be wrong, Cassius Philippus. There are
posts bearing my name where I have plenty of good things to say. In
this forum. Really.

I think you are hitting dregs here, Cassius. I am far from perfect,
and I've made mistakes... but that I have nothing good to say about
anyone's posts is an emotional statement on your part.

I think we should be mindful of the list content for many reasons.
This is the first list people often see after visiting the main
website....do they join it to.... say, listen to Po telling nun
jokes? (I know some but don't put them here of course)....Flavius
telling ambiguous Jesus jokes?...multiple posts on macronational
politics? Oh, they'll press the delete key alright....and not
bother staying. They'll pretend they are on the street and"just walk
away"....as you put it.

Could we collectively consider the welfare of NR when
posting?...myself included, yes.

There is a group called the Back Alley that you might enjoy.
Seriously. Lots of good macronational conversations...politics,
religious stuff. It is totally unmoderated so put your gloves on,
but it is populated in part by citizens of NR.

Valete
Pompeia

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Sensei Phil Perez" <senseiphil@n...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Tiberia,
>
> Ever heard of a delete button? Maybe we don't want to read your
rant either. It seems that you only post to complain about someone
else's posts. Just pretend you're on the street and just walk away.
Or do you walk up to people you overhear and complain to them as
well? It seems that Flavius has touched a raw nerve here. Could it
be you he is talking about in the story? I never would have guessed
until you brought it up ;-)
>
> Vires et honos,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 1:45 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: (fwd) Tailgater
>
>
> ---CENSORES ET PRAETORES SAL.
>
> What the heck has this latest offering of Flavius Fides below
have
> to do with anything Roman?
>
> Flavius Fides has tied up the entire mainlist with
macronational,
> marginally-related (if you use your imagination) Roman themes,
which
> perhaps would have best been shared with a professional social
> worker, therapist, or in private to a citizen who is willing to
> listen and help him brainstorm solutions.
>
> I'm always willing to listen.
>
> This post below is totally unacceptable.
>
> I refuse to accept the steroptype 'Ned Flanders' reputation that
is
> randomly assigned to persons with the mentality attracted by The
> Simpsons. For myself and for others. Especially by Flavius
> Fides...judging by his posts today....
>
> Especially in a Nova Roma forum where I am constitutionally
entitled
> to be subject to the macronational laws of my birth country...
(no
> unsubstantiated hate stuff assigned to groups of people
> posted/published en mass) and where I am theoretically
entitled
> also to forums which are reasonably moderated to maintain
civility.
>
> Please, I ask you Honoured Censores/Praetores either by means of
> morality or legality....whatever device....address this
behaviour.
>
> This is NOT usenet,or a rap battle board. I don't care if Fides
> likes me or not. I'm almost glad he might not. Nonetheless, he
is
> vandalizing the forum today, with stuff that has little
usefulness
> in terms of Roman/NovaRoma conflict.
>
>
> Thanks et valete,
> Pompeia
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...>
> wrote:
> >
> > A story Id like to share...
> > --- aronson@p... <aronson@p...> wrote:
> > > The Tailgater
> > >
> > > An honest man was being tailgated by a stressed out
> > woman on a busy
> > > boulevard. Suddenly, the light turned yellow, just
> > in front of him.
> > >
> > > He did the right thing, stopping at the crosswalk,
> > even though he
> > > could have beaten the red light by accelerating
> > through the
> > > intersection.
> > >
> > > The tailgating woman hit the roof, and the horn,
> > screaming in
> > > frustration as she missed her chance to get through
> > the intersection.
> > > As she was still in mid-rant, she heard a tap on her
> > window and looked
> > > up into the face of a very serious police officer.
> > The officer ordered
> > > her to exit her car with her hands up. He took her
> > to the police
> > > station where she was searched, finger printed,
> > photographed and
> > > placed in a holding cell.
> > >
> > > After a couple of hours, a policeman approached the
> > cell and opened
> > > the door. She was escorted back to the booking desk
> > where the
> > > arresting officer was waiting with her personal
> > effects.
> > >
> > > He said, "I'm very sorry for this mistake. You see,
> > I pulled up behind
> > > your car while you were blowing your horn, flipping
> > off the guy in
> > > front of you, and cussing a blue streak at him. "I
> > noticed the 'Choose
> > > Life' license plate holder, the 'What Would Jesus
> > Do' bumper sticker,
> > > the 'Follow Me to Sunday-School' bumper sticker, and
> > the chrome-plated
> > > Christian fish emblem on the trunk. Naturally, I
> > assumed you had
> > > stolen the car."
> > >
> >
> >
> > S P Q R
> >
> > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> >
> > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > Roman Citizen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/175 - Release Date:
11/18/2005
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39624 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
C. Equitius Cato P. Minuciae-Tiberiae Straboni S.P.D.

Salve senatrix.

I assume that the citizens who read these posts can remember, somehow,
what has been said just previously.

Vale bene,

Cato the Grumpy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39625 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Some Possible Solutions
C. Equitius Cato A. Minuciae-Tiberiae Audenti Semproniae S.P.D.

Salve Annia Sempronia.

I think you'll find exactly what you're suggesting in my "test" Forum,
here:

http://www.armleg.com/forum/novaromanortham.html

As I mentioned earlier,

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
DISCLAIMER: THIS IS ABSOLUTELY *NOT* OFFICIAL OR REFLECTIVE OF ANY
PART OF NOVA ROMA, ITS GOVERNMENT, MAGISTRATES, OR PEOPLE WHATSOEVER
--- IT IS *ONLY* A "TEST"
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Go. Play. See if you like it.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39626 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Some Possible Solutions
Salve,

Yes, that is exactly it. I have one of these as well. It is designated for
my familia and gens, http://minucia.ciarin.com It isn't really active
though.

Vale,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia

----- Original Message -----
From: "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 1:44 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Some Possible Solutions


> C. Equitius Cato A. Minuciae-Tiberiae Audenti Semproniae S.P.D.
>
> Salve Annia Sempronia.
>
> I think you'll find exactly what you're suggesting in my "test" Forum,
> here:
>
> http://www.armleg.com/forum/novaromanortham.html
>
> As I mentioned earlier,
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> DISCLAIMER: THIS IS ABSOLUTELY *NOT* OFFICIAL OR REFLECTIVE OF ANY
> PART OF NOVA ROMA, ITS GOVERNMENT, MAGISTRATES, OR PEOPLE WHATSOEVER
> --- IT IS *ONLY* A "TEST"
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Go. Play. See if you like it.
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39627 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Farewell
On 11/20/05, lucius_fidelius <nexus909@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes.


> A real Roman departs our midst to do what real Romans have always
> > done: To fight Barbarians! The rest of us can continue to sit here
> > in the forum and talk all the nonsense we want. Our rights to do so
> > protected by young men like Flavius. Yes, even those of us who do
> > not live in the USA.

I think the problem for many of us who are not American is "define
Barbarian" I think Americans would be shocked by what the rest of the world
thinks


> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:10:48AM -0800, raymond fuentes wrote:
> > I fight a losing battle with the left everyday as a
> > policeman and I am miserable doing it.I am more
> > comfortable fighting amongst the right...I fear for
> > the West
>
> And there are many here that have a deep respect for that.

Really??? Well I'm certainly not one of them. I was brought up to believe
the police were here to defend the citizens - not first aske their political
persuasion!! I've been a law abiding citizen all my life. I make no apology
for the fact that my politics are way left of centre. And I now find that
policiemen are 'miserable.. fighting a losing battle' with me. All I can say
is if that's you're American Police then thank all the Gods I serve they
didn't see fit to have me born in that country!!!
Flavia Lucilla Merula


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39628 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Farewell...
You're quite correct my friend. My mistake.
----- Original Message -----
From: Benjamin A. Okopnik
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Farewell...


Salve, Marce Cassi -

On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 11:46:32AM -0500, Sensei Phil Perez wrote:
> Salve Scaevola,
>
> My reply to you was sent of-list but since you insist on countering
> publicly and only using tiny bits of it out of context it is only fair
> that everyone see what exactly you responded to in its entirety. Those
> of you who have had enough of this discussion you know what to do -
> press the delete button and move on ;-)

[ snip ]

Perhaps we've crossed wires somewhere. I've just checked my "Sent mail"
box, and I don't see where I _ever_ forwarded a private email of yours
to NovaRoma; that would be completely against my own principles. If I
have done so unwittingly, you have my most sincere apologies - but I do
not see where I did so in anything you quoted below.

Perhaps you can enlighten me in regard to what you consider a private
email of yours that I forwarded to NR; at the moment, I'm completely
puzzled as to your claim. I've responded publicly to your posts that I
saw in NR, and I've responded privately to your emails.

Again, let me emphasize - if I have somehow forwarded one of your emails
here, it was done unintentionally and in error - and you have my most
sincere apologies.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/175 - Release Date: 11/18/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39629 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Salvete omnes,

If Pompeia were to get her wish and have an edictum issued to, in effect highly censor this forum, this forum would cease to exist as what it is - a public forum to be used freely by all citizens to communicate anything they desire to communicate to one another. I have had very animated discussions with several very worthy adversaries here. I have great respect for all of them even if I may not agree with their positions on these issues, but it is great fun to argue my points with worthy adversaries (friends) who disagree with them. After all, you can't debate a topic with people who totally agree - ne? Even when I disagree I learn from their arguments, and I suspect they do too.

I could care less what other communities may think about our discourse. I belong to this community. I am interested in what other members (of this community) think on a great many topics besides those of ancient Rome precisely because they are members of this (our) community. It may seem like we are fighting at times but that should not concern anyone. If we didn't like it, we would not be responding to each other's arguments, so we must obviously be enjoying the discussion no matter how animated it may sound. We do stay civil. Those that don't wouldn't get taken seriously by anyone. To date I have yet to see anyone fit this particular category in this forum, they are probably on some rap music chat room somewhere (no offense to Roman rap music lovers :-) I wouldn't waste my time responding to moronic rantings anyway, only educated ones ;-) We are just showing our emotional (and very Roman) nature.

Some people however seem to enjoy censoring anything they find objectionable as if it were their duty to "shield" everyone else from any discussion they may find offensive or boring. I note that even though Pompeia disliked this thread of conversation she did take the time to let us know which side of the argument she agrees with, Gee. like I couldn't have guessed. Typical hypocracy for her. If she likes it, it is a great conversation and topic, if she doesn't it obviously borders on "hate speech" or is "off topic" and should be moderated - i.e. "censored". This is the kind thinking that has led to insane new PC phrases in the English language such as "vertically challenged" (for short) and "deferred succes" (for failure), etc.

The more PC this forum becomes, the less you will actually see posted here. I belong to only one other internet e-mail list. A martial arts based one that only allows posts dealing with technical martial arts questions. Believe it or not I am one of the "answer guys" there since I have over 40 years of experience in that field. That message board is, because of this rule - usually quite dead in comparison to this one even though just like this one, it has a huge membership list. Would you like to see the same thing happen here? This is a perfect prescription for it. No arguments there, very little discourse whatsoever! BORING!!!

Let people discuss whatever they desire and just use the delete button. Or better yet, opt to not receive the e-mails and just go to the yahoo group site and pick out those posts you want to read if you don't want the long e-mail chain on your internet server. I chose this for a long time myself. The outcome - I was not really a part of this community. Perhaps some members would like me to go back to that ;-) I choose to receive these e-mails on a daily basis since I am part of this community. I want to know what's happening here and I definitely would not like to be muzzled or gagged in any way either. I have been using my delete button quite liberally lately since I have no interest in virtual chariot races or gladiatorial games, if a real one were to be staged, please let me know, I'll be the first one there to participate as a gladiator and to bet heavily on the races! Yet I would never consider telling them to start a Ludii List and keep it off this one since I'm not intertested in their virtual sports. Guys and gals - don't get offended - just using this as an example - what may interest some may not interest others in this community.

in conclusion, to censor this forum or have a Pompeia Tiberia or someone like her decide what is and what isn't appropriate for posting here, the only real public forum of Nova Roma, would make at least this citizen "choose" to leave this nation.

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39630 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
Salve Pompeia,

Thanks for the tip about the back alley. Knuckle Dragging Subura Types like me will undoubtedly feel comfortably at home there telling off colored jokes but I don't consider any of the topics here of that variety. Newcomers to Nova Roma will either feel comfortable with the rest of us citizens in this forum or they won't. If they do, this community will be the richer for it, if not who cares? Do we want to put on a "Hari Krishna Smile" here for them? I for one am "what-and-who-I-am" and will either be accepted or rejected on that basis. I personally get real nervous in any social group that is in agreement about everything. Too Spooky for me! I rather like the messy group we have here, very Roman! I do seem however to see your name always attached to appeals for "moderating" someone or other. If you recall, you had me moderated as well.

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 1:32 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: (fwd) Tailgater


---
Salve Cassius Philippus et Salvete Omnes:

Very funny.

It 'seems' that you might be wrong, Cassius Philippus. There are
posts bearing my name where I have plenty of good things to say. In
this forum. Really.

I think you are hitting dregs here, Cassius. I am far from perfect,
and I've made mistakes... but that I have nothing good to say about
anyone's posts is an emotional statement on your part.

I think we should be mindful of the list content for many reasons.
This is the first list people often see after visiting the main
website....do they join it to.... say, listen to Po telling nun
jokes? (I know some but don't put them here of course)....Flavius
telling ambiguous Jesus jokes?...multiple posts on macronational
politics? Oh, they'll press the delete key alright....and not
bother staying. They'll pretend they are on the street and"just walk
away"....as you put it.

Could we collectively consider the welfare of NR when
posting?...myself included, yes.

There is a group called the Back Alley that you might enjoy.
Seriously. Lots of good macronational conversations...politics,
religious stuff. It is totally unmoderated so put your gloves on,
but it is populated in part by citizens of NR.

Valete
Pompeia

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Sensei Phil Perez" <senseiphil@n...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Tiberia,
>
> Ever heard of a delete button? Maybe we don't want to read your
rant either. It seems that you only post to complain about someone
else's posts. Just pretend you're on the street and just walk away.
Or do you walk up to people you overhear and complain to them as
well? It seems that Flavius has touched a raw nerve here. Could it
be you he is talking about in the story? I never would have guessed
until you brought it up ;-)
>
> Vires et honos,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 1:45 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: (fwd) Tailgater
>
>
> ---CENSORES ET PRAETORES SAL.
>
> What the heck has this latest offering of Flavius Fides below
have
> to do with anything Roman?
>
> Flavius Fides has tied up the entire mainlist with
macronational,
> marginally-related (if you use your imagination) Roman themes,
which
> perhaps would have best been shared with a professional social
> worker, therapist, or in private to a citizen who is willing to
> listen and help him brainstorm solutions.
>
> I'm always willing to listen.
>
> This post below is totally unacceptable.
>
> I refuse to accept the steroptype 'Ned Flanders' reputation that
is
> randomly assigned to persons with the mentality attracted by The
> Simpsons. For myself and for others. Especially by Flavius
> Fides...judging by his posts today....
>
> Especially in a Nova Roma forum where I am constitutionally
entitled
> to be subject to the macronational laws of my birth country...
(no
> unsubstantiated hate stuff assigned to groups of people
> posted/published en mass) and where I am theoretically
entitled
> also to forums which are reasonably moderated to maintain
civility.
>
> Please, I ask you Honoured Censores/Praetores either by means of
> morality or legality....whatever device....address this
behaviour.
>
> This is NOT usenet,or a rap battle board. I don't care if Fides
> likes me or not. I'm almost glad he might not. Nonetheless, he
is
> vandalizing the forum today, with stuff that has little
usefulness
> in terms of Roman/NovaRoma conflict.
>
>
> Thanks et valete,
> Pompeia
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@y...>
> wrote:
> >
> > A story Id like to share...
> > --- aronson@p... <aronson@p...> wrote:
> > > The Tailgater
> > >
> > > An honest man was being tailgated by a stressed out
> > woman on a busy
> > > boulevard. Suddenly, the light turned yellow, just
> > in front of him.
> > >
> > > He did the right thing, stopping at the crosswalk,
> > even though he
> > > could have beaten the red light by accelerating
> > through the
> > > intersection.
> > >
> > > The tailgating woman hit the roof, and the horn,
> > screaming in
> > > frustration as she missed her chance to get through
> > the intersection.
> > > As she was still in mid-rant, she heard a tap on her
> > window and looked
> > > up into the face of a very serious police officer.
> > The officer ordered
> > > her to exit her car with her hands up. He took her
> > to the police
> > > station where she was searched, finger printed,
> > photographed and
> > > placed in a holding cell.
> > >
> > > After a couple of hours, a policeman approached the
> > cell and opened
> > > the door. She was escorted back to the booking desk
> > where the
> > > arresting officer was waiting with her personal
> > effects.
> > >
> > > He said, "I'm very sorry for this mistake. You see,
> > I pulled up behind
> > > your car while you were blowing your horn, flipping
> > off the guy in
> > > front of you, and cussing a blue streak at him. "I
> > noticed the 'Choose
> > > Life' license plate holder, the 'What Would Jesus
> > Do' bumper sticker,
> > > the 'Follow Me to Sunday-School' bumper sticker, and
> > the chrome-plated
> > > Christian fish emblem on the trunk. Naturally, I
> > assumed you had
> > > stolen the car."
> > >
> >
> >
> > S P Q R
> >
> > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> >
> > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > Roman Citizen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/175 - Release Date:
11/18/2005
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/175 - Release Date: 11/18/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39631 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: American Police protect ALL people, its part of our oath.
When I stated that I fight a losing battle w/ the left
I refered to politics & legalities that impede our
ability to police effectively not ACTUAL people.

S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39632 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Farewell...
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 02:12:07PM -0500, Sensei Phil Perez wrote:
> You're quite correct my friend. My mistake.

*Whew.* :) I was hoping that I hadn't somehow, after years of posting
_and_ being a list owner and list policy creator, screwed up to that
great of a degree; it would have meant that some of my automatic
keyboard-finger-poking was badly off the rails. Glad to hear that it's
otherwise.

Thanks for the acknowledgement, amice.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Magna vis veritatis quae facile se per se ipsa defendat.
Great is the power of truth that can easily defend itself with its own force.
-- N/A
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39633 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Salvete Cato Omnesque,

only the discussions obviously not Roman related would have to be marked as "Off Topic".
This will filter a good amount of messages that a magistrate will not have to read.

Valete,

Scipio

--- gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:

> C. Equitius Cato S. Apollonio Scipioni quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salve et salvete.
>
> A very interesting idea; it might work. You are left with the
> question open of exactly what is "off topic" for a citizen of the
> Republic in the Republic's most common space.
>
> Vale et valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
>
> > I propose that any message that is not pertaining to the life of
> Nova Roma should have in
> > the subject field something like "OFF TOPIC" or "NOT NR" or
> whatever. With such a mark,
> > the author of the message clearly indicates that the post is not
> intended to NR as a
> > whole and that the contents are not binding.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> >
> >
> > Sextus Apollonius Scipio
> >
> > Propraetor Galliae
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
> > http://farechase.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>





__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39634 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
I do believe that the fish symbol originated with early ROMAN Christians. So
arguably, this does something to do with Rome.
;-)

--
>|P. Dominus Antonius|<
Tony Dah m

Oderint dum metuant - Cicero
Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius

On 11/20/05, pompeia_minucia_tiberia <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
wrote:
>
> What the heck has this latest offering of Flavius Fides below have
> to do with anything Roman?
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@y...>
> wrote:
> >
> > and the chrome-plated Christian fish emblem on the trunk.
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39635 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Salvete,

> Some people however seem to enjoy censoring anything they find objectionable as if it
> were their duty to "shield" everyone else from any discussion they may find offensive
> or boring.

I respect your need to speak as freely as you may wish. However, I hope you will respect
my duty as a magistrate. Posting whatever on this Forum forces me to read almost all
messages as some of them might well be binding. This week, I spent more than two hours
browsing messages that were not Roman related. This is two hours less for Nova Roma.

Valete,


Sextus Apollonius Scipio

Propraetor Galliae



__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39636 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: American Police protect ALL people, its part of our oath.
Salvete, omnes -

On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 11:34:20AM -0800, raymond fuentes wrote:
> When I stated that I fight a losing battle w/ the left
> I refered to politics & legalities that impede our
> ability to police effectively not ACTUAL people.

I presume that would be all those leftie rules like... the Miranda
rights? Or perhaps the Amnesty International report on policy brutality
in then NYPD?

http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAMR510361996?open&of=ENG-347

Perhaps it was the actions of the NYPD's Internal Affairs Bureau, which
was charged with rectifying those problems? Liberals, every one of them
- clearly.

No, it must have been all those evil Liberal pretensions like the Mollen
Commission that exposed corruption within NYPD, as well as its inability
at that time to police itself. Or maybe... well, why guess? Perhaps you
can enlighten us as to these "politics and legalities" that you battle -
presumably in your second job as a lawmaker. As I understood it, a
police officer's job is to _enforce_ the law rather than make it. But I
may be mistaken.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Mater artium necessitas.
Necessity is the mother of invention.
-- N/A
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39637 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Yahoo! Policies FYI....regarding Moderation, 'Off-Topic' posts, etc.
Salvete Omnes:

Having read this before, being a moderator, but not being sure of
the exact wording I went ahead and looked up the link to Groups Help
where Yahoo policies/recommendations are listed relative to
questions group members and moderators might have.

http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/messages/index.html

Under Moderator Questions, Yahoo states that if a member is sending
inappropriate or offtopic messages, said moderator is entitled to
moderate or ban the poster. This is not necessarily, as I read it,
for anything illegal, it is just to restrict the posting messages
that are off-topic in that group. Now Yahoo, and I agree with this
in general, recommends that a private heads-up to the poster is in
order before the next step.

I did a search with Offtopic messages and got this:

http://search1.cc.dcn.yahoo.com/cct_search.php

and I hope this search link works.

Yahoo cites the most common reason of a member being moderated
isto 'make individuals messages posts moderated due to off-topic and
high-volume posting'

So, largely, the Praetores, acting as moderators do this very
thing. This is how Yahoo! suggests we operate. They say nothing
about well, 'you can claim the first and say whatever you
wish'...no...it is within the purview of the moderator or
moderator/owner (depending on how many privileges the owner gives a
moderator) to make the determination of whether or not to moderate,
based on message content.

And if posting behaviour violates the Yahoo! TOS then it would
behoove the moderator to moderate the poster, as we are all subject
to that.

This is not dictatorship. I guess it is censorship in a sense from
a very liberal standpoint, but the whole idea behind the Groups
feature of Yahoo! is to provide people with likeminded interests a
place where they can focus discussion on their topics of interest.
It does advocate censorship of the group itself, by the group's
moderators, but it doesn't restrict people from joining a group
where they would feel more at home, where perhaps no moderation
exists, and anything goes....

I agree that one can carry things to extremes in policing a list,
but I believe the Praetores have been reasonable this year....and
all they are doing is following the terms of service and the Yahoo
Groups policies.

I happen to think these rules are workable and reasonable.

I do not believe in strangling freedom of speech. It's an issue of
speaking responsibly....like drinking responsibly I guess. I know it
is up to everyone to make that determination, but Yahoo does seem to
allow the moderator to call the shots regarding moderation, on-
topic, offtopic, etc. And here its the Praetor, by Nova Roma law.

I hope this helps
Pompeia

It was decided in 2000 that this list needed some
moderation...clearly it was not working.



You can look at the policies on Spam,
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39638 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: American Police protect ALL people, its part of our oath.
Who cares? Stop bitching. Both of you.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39639 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Police duty, was Re: Farewell
Valetudo quod fortuna,

Venator scripsit:

On 11/20/05, Kirsteen Wright <kirsteen.falconsfan@...> wrote:
> [excision]
>
> Really??? Well I'm certainly not one of them. I was brought up to believe
> the police were here to defend the citizens - not first aske their political
> persuasion!! I've been a law abiding citizen all my life. I make no apology
> for the fact that my politics are way left of centre. And I now find that
> policiemen are 'miserable.. fighting a losing battle' with me. All I can say
> is if that's you're American Police then thank all the Gods I serve they
> didn't see fit to have me born in that country!!!
> Flavia Lucilla Merula
>

A very common misconception that people have is written above.

Courts, from State District to US Supreme, have ruled many times since
the mid-19th century that the police duty is to uphold the Law and to
protect the State/Collective interest. There is no duty to protect
the individual citizen. This is why so few lawsuits over the late
arrival of police, thereby not preventing harm to individuals,
succeed.

NOW, this does NOT obliterate the Sense of Duty that a law enforcement
officer does, strongly, feel towards the men, women and children in
their communities.

Nor does it mitigate the frustration that many police of my
acquaintence feel towards working within a Criminal, rather than a
Victim's, Justice system.

But it does highlight the fact that a freeborn Citizen is responsible
for self defense.

It is also worth mentioning that equal protection under the law does
appear in the US Constitution, which should apply to all Citizens
regardless of any differences: faith, ethnicity, politics, etceteras.

And to bring this more into a Roman context...

Taking the above as a start, do we know what duty the State had to the
Cives as far as individual guarantees of safety and justice were like
in the Republic? What was lawful for self-defense? Was there equal
protection? How were Peregrines treated differently?

Polity has always been an interest of mine.

Politics give me a rash ,-)

=========================================
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poet
US Military - Veteran

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/

--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39640 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
---Salvete Sectus Apollonius Scipio Propraetor et Omnes

Just as an addendum to my last post on the Yahoo services Groups
policies, and relating it to your idea of identifying off-topic
posts as such...it would be perfectly acceptable to ask the
Praetores to consider making this a policy. I like the idea to
begin with, an excellent one.

But just to let you know that its ok with Yahoo if its ok with the
Praetores!

Po


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Sextus Apollonius Scipio
<scipio_apollonius@y...> wrote:
>
> Salvete,
>
> > Some people however seem to enjoy censoring anything they find
objectionable as if it
> > were their duty to "shield" everyone else from any discussion
they may find offensive
> > or boring.
>
> I respect your need to speak as freely as you may wish. However, I
hope you will respect
> my duty as a magistrate. Posting whatever on this Forum forces me
to read almost all
> messages as some of them might well be binding. This week, I spent
more than two hours
> browsing messages that were not Roman related. This is two hours
less for Nova Roma.
>
> Valete,
>
>
> Sextus Apollonius Scipio
>
> Propraetor Galliae
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
> http://farechase.yahoo.com
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39641 From: Maior Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL whither Caesariensis...
M. Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
you will notice that the frequent poster & off-topic
commentator Caesariensis has suddenly dissappeared and right now my
post is unanswered.
I am pretty firm about, 'what are you doing for real life
activities in Nova Roma' especially in Europe where there are Roman
ruins to see, yep even in Hibernia.
Now anyone is free to ask me, what the heck I'm doing for
NR. I've contacted the newly-formed Duke pagans and it looks like
we'll be having a Saturnalia celebration and I'll be making the
mulsum and other Roman fare, later giving a presentation on the
Religio.
All of you can have a bit of a Saturnalia party, it starts
Dec 17th and involves food & merrymaking.
In the spring, I hope to do some recruiting at the Classics
dept.
so omnes, remember whether you just sit in a cafe or
restaurant with one other person, and discuss Roma Antiqua. That's
fabulous. I love the ML but let's get out there and meet!
bene valete
Marca Hortensia Maior TRP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39642 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL (Pompeia's Moderation)
Salvete omnes,

There were lots of posts to cover today on this topic and I believe
someone came up with a "what if" situation with respect to Pompeia
as a moderator.

When I initially came to Nova Roma, I stumbled on to this list
first. One big reson I stuck around was because I liked the way
Pompeia ran the list. It was not much different than now but off
topic discussions were allowed. As I remember, Pompeia had an
uncanny way of knowing when things were getting too ugly and knew
exactly when to step in and put the cork on the discussion.
Furthermore if you went beyond the guidelines she had the courtesy
to contact you in private, let you know what was up and also
considered your point of view. Many of her posts on the ML were
considered interesting, wise and well researched and respected by
many of us whether we agreed with her or not.

Pompeia then took a little time off and unfortunately the list
became beset in an awful religious war which was not "initially"
about the religio and Christianity but more about " Conqeror Worm"
type stuff about how hard done by wiccans, witches and other sects
in the 13th - 17th centuries. Some citizens and non citizens got
very rude insulting attacking various beliefs to the point of being
blasphames etc. Quite a few good people I know packed it in or lost
interest and became totally inactive, even to this day.

In my opinion, Nova Roma has never really fully recovered from this
episode so perhaps the price of "total" freedom to say what you like
on this list without some limit or moderation is a price a little
too high to pay. Some citizens on this list have been here for a
short time yet others like Pompeia have certainly been here longer
and know the ropes and see what can happen if the list goes
unchecked too long. As the saying goes, fool me once, shame on you!
Fool me twicw, shame on me!

Oh, we are trying to emulate Republican Rome. Freedom of speech had
its limits - the ghosts Of Cicero and so many others who fell to
Sulla's proscription lists would certainly attest to that.


Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39643 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
Haven't you heard, ancient Romans never disagreed about anything. And always
stayed on topic. In the Forum, no one was ever allowed to bring up matters
relating solely to distant provinces. And of course punishing anyone with
the temerity to say something you didn't like was also good Roman fun.
--
>|P. Dominus Antonius|<
Tony Dah m

Oderint dum metuant - Cicero
Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius

On 11/20/05, Sensei Phil Perez <senseiphil@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Pompeia,
>
> I personally get real nervous in any social group that is in agreement
> about everything. Too Spooky for me! I rather like the messy group we have
> here, very Roman! I do seem however to see your name always attached to
> appeals for "moderating" someone or other.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39644 From: Gaia Apollonia Silana Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Salve Quintus Suetonius -

Thank you for your thoughtful post. And I have taken your suggestion
and applied to the other, more specific, lists. With that, I think it
will be much more enjoyable to be part of this Forum.

Gaia Apollonia Salina

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) wrote:

> Salve Gaia Apollonia et salvete omnes,
>
> This main list is Roman themed and is supposed to be like the Roman
> market place where many topics are discussed. Sometimes discussuions
> for one reason or another evolve in the direction of macronational
> politics or religion and do so when some of us make blanket
> statements, hasty generalizations, emotional appeals etc. no matter
> what side of the fence they are on. Many of us feel that the main
> list is our Saturday market where these discussions from gossip to
> current affairs should and did take place.
>
> Having said that I think experience and common sense has taught us
> that there comes a point where the plug should be pulled on various
> threads, especially when they start to get too personal, upset some
> of the citizens, cause others to leave the list or NR; in short
> disrupting the Pax Romana. I just wanted to let you know that we had
> a terribly long and ugly religious argument a few months after I
> joined Nova Roma (3 years ago) which made me initially scratch my
> head; mind you I probably didn't help matters too much when I joined
> the fray throwing in my sestaries worth of opinions but in time the
> thread ended, some people quit, new people joined and the business
> of Rome and Nova Roma continued as it always does.
>
> I just want to point out to you that there are quite a few
> sodalistas or special interest groups in NR covering the Latin
> language, art, food, geography, the Roman military, relgion,
> welcoming/reach out etc. I would encourage you to check them out
> also and can assure you the moderation is stricter with respect to
> staying on topic.
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaia Apollonia Silana
> <samantha@e...> wrote:
> >
> > Salve -
> >
> > I am new here - just applied for Citizenship - and have been
> watching
> > the macroworld conversation with a bit of confusion. I, for one,
> agree
> > with the moratorium idea.
> >
> > Vale,
> > Gaia Apollonia Silana
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39645 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Yahoo! Policies FYI....regarding Moderation, 'Off-Topic' posts,
C. Equitius Cato P. Minuciae-Tiberiae Straboni omnibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Senatrix, hold onto your hat: I agree with you entirely. :-)

The question, I think, is where do we draw the line of what is "off
topic" when we are dealing with an international community of some
1100+ members?

When we have a Forum (this List) that is the central point for a large
number of our citizens, the conversations we have will, almost by
necessity, evolve; even if it starts out as a purely "Roman" topic, it
is human nature to go off in tangents, sometimes to the point at which
the only vestige of the original topic is the subject line.

Apollonius Scipio has, in fact, produced the most Roman response of
all: one of practicality. But the point I am making is that even "off
topic" subjects are being discussed by citizens of the Republic ---
who are by definition always "on topic", so to speak --- so how do we
decide when to snap the reins of moderation?

And just to be absolutely clear: by virtue of the imperium vested in
me by the Praetor L. Arminus Faustus, I too am a moderator of this
List; I must read every message as well. I am, perhaps by virtue of
the pecuiarities of my macronational existence, more "liberal" in my
own application of the guidelines than some might prefer; but I would
much rather see and hear the snap and crackle of vibrant conversation
among citizens than to adopt some sort of faux gravitas, turning our
citizens into blank, plain white marble busts.

Vale et valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39646 From: rocknrockabilly Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Some Possible Solutions
Salvete omnes,

I wholeheartedly agree with the idea of a new, different, improved
Forum. I recall that a citizen, a few months ago, took it upon himself to
establish such a forum, besides this one. His decision drew several
critics, partly because the idea had not been sanctioned by the censors.
I do not know what has become of the forum now, but I support the
idea of an official discussion Forum that would not be a Yahoo group.

I have been involved in many online discussions group. All of them
were organized according to topic and subject of interest, so that
citizens can sort out what they wish to discuss, and can in fact know
where they are in the discussion.

Who, among our elected officials, is in charge of the Forum? An
official proposal must be made.

Valete bene,

Tit. Afr. Sec. Flamininus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39647 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
I do not like formal meetings with strangers. This way, I can choose what
subjects interest me and avoid which do not. Meetings involve looking the part,
dealing with people I don't know from Adam and probably getting all sorts of
personal questions I prefer not to involve myself in. When I know something of
individuals through information exchange, or what other people say of them in
light of what I know about those other people, or through working together, or
through observation in an anonymous crowd, then, when they are no longer
strangers, I might make some personal contact. Otherwise, I have always been
shy.





M. Hortensia M. Lucretio spd;
Apollodevotees have the best ideas;-) thank you Agricola.

Now I'd really like to know Caesariensis, you are so active on the
ML, but the entire time I was Propraetrix of Hibernia I never could
get you to come to a meeting or answer my phone calls. Nova Roma needs
real life cives. What are you doing for Provincia Hibernia?
bene valete
Marca Hortensia Maior TRP

Caput Officina Iuriis et
Investigatio CFBQ



> > M. Lucretius Agricola wrote:
> >
> > > M. Lucretius Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.
> > >
> > > I propose a 7 day voluntary moratorium on discussion of
macronational
> > > politics and current global events other than topics relatedto
> > > natural disasters and humanitarian aid.
> > >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>










YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on theweb.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an emailto:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










"Politicians are like monkeys: the higher they climb the tree of ambition
the more of their arses you can see" - Pieter Dirg-Uys.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39648 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
Thank you. This is how I see it too. No doubt much was said in the Form
regarding the ParthianProblem, Jewish Question and German Menace. If we do feel
some Graeco-Roman outlook on life, then we function like anybody else in
relation to the world around. To do otherwise were to adopt some kind of
Amish-Mennonite mentality isolating not it, but ourselves. The tendency I regret
is for these macro-debates to become American internal political debates
excluding the rest of us and not encouraging in fact for a N-R 'community'. If
everything becomes part of US internal thinking, then so does N-R and I for one
see it as a more humane (though by no means perfect) antidote to a world
concerned only with blind profit and personal greed.
Caesariensis





C. Equitius Cato quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

I had posted my agreement to the idea of a moratorium when something
struck me after re-reading several posts.

Are we indeed an on-line Yahoo! Group dedicated to studying Roman
history --- or are we a living Roman community?

The difference is important.

If we are a group interested in Roman history (with a couple of jazzy
titles for our leaders), then we are basically the same as any number
of philosophical, historical, educational, religious, &c. groups one
can vist and/or join on the internet. A few interesting topics, a
nice (pseudo)scholarly debate, everyone smiling and very pleased at
how wonderful it is to be in such an erudite, like-minded bunch of web
users. Nothing too emotional, thank you, except in a distant kind ofway.

If we are a Roman community, then we are far beyond that. The Forum
(the name I prefer to use for this, the so-called "Main List")is
where we meet together and speak and interact. Where do we drawthe
line at what is, as Senatrix Minucia-Tiberia Strabo has called it,
"marginally-related"? What can be considered marginal to aplace
where citizens gather with each other to speak? Aside fromthe
generally-accepted level of civility --- which (truth be told)would
never have been applied in the Forum of ancient Rome, and whichwe
suffer solely because it is a requirement of the Yahoo! standards---
what we have witnessed is simply the interaction of citizens in a
public space in a free society.

When I read these posts, I was tempted to agree with the senatrix and
I certainly understand her reasoning.

Then I had to think, "Well, what if the discussions I've had about
legal issues are as uninteresting to other citizens as these are to
me? Should I have been muzzled?" (NO COMMENTS PLEASE) Whatline does
one draw determining the level of interest (or lack thereof)necessary
for a topic to be considered important --- or dismissed as "marginal"?

Apollonius Cordus and others have voiced issues with
"Americanocentrism" in this Forum --- and these are understandableas
well; I agree that the Forum is not simply the default "American
List", as it were. However, the role that the UnitedStates plays in
the world around us is of such immediacy, and has suchrepercussions
on every nation in every corner of the globe, that topretend that
these actions (and their political and philosophicalramifications)
are marginal to the existence of anyone on the planet isan
unsupportable idea. It is simply a fact, and trying to pretendit
does not exist is the equivalent of trying to ignore the elephantin
the room because you're not interested in (or don't like) elephants.
Yes, yes, I know --- everybody's tired of hearing about the United
States. Imagine how the Egyptians felt about Rome.

When a citizen is told to "take it to another List", we are
essentially saying, "what you are interested in talking about is
either not interesting to or not appropriate for the public". But
this is the Forum; the only way, for many of our citizens, to ever
interact with each other. Religion, politics, and sex --- the three
things which we are told NEVER to discuss with people we don't know
--- are a part of the life of a community.


So, which do we value more? Freedom of speech, or "freedom"from
being offended by another citizen's views, no matter how ridiculous,
unimportant, or outlandish one might think they are?

Valete bene,

Cato













SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history
Fall of the roman empire
The fall of the romanempire
Roman empire




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on theweb.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an emailto:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










"Politicians are like monkeys: the higher they climb the tree of ambition
the more of their arses you can see" - Pieter Dirg-Uys.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39649 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
It's a joke. By definition jokes are off-topic. But what is so unacceptable or
offensive? Because it features a woman? Because it appears to feature a
hypocritial Christian - maybe the car and stickers were her husband's - and this
is exactly the sort of thing the gospels are full of inreference to
self-righteous Pharisees. Sill, maybe. Off-topic, maybe. Offensive, deserving of
moderation? Has Robert Mugabe taken over?
Caesariensis





Salve Pompeia, et salvete omnes,

pompeia_minucia_tiberia wrote:
> ---CENSORES ET PRAETORES SAL.
[...]
> This post below is totally unacceptable.

It is. I ask the praetores to place Fides on moderation until such time
as he demonstrates that he understands the praetorian edictum concerning
posting to the mainlist.

Vale,

Gn. Equitius Marinus
Censor






YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on theweb.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an emailto:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










"Politicians are like monkeys: the higher they climb the tree of ambition
the more of their arses you can see" - Pieter Dirg-Uys.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39650 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: American Police protect ALL people, its part of our oath.
Trying to find a proactive cop is akin to finding a
dinosaur alive & well.We turn a blind eye to things to
avoid conflict.IS THAT IN THE PUBLICS BEST INTEREST?
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <ben@...>
wrote:
> Salvete, omnes -
>
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 11:34:20AM -0800, raymond
fuentes wrote:
> > When I stated that I fight a losing battle w/ the
left
> > I refered to politics & legalities that impede our
> > ability to police effectively not ACTUAL people.
>
> I presume that would be all those leftie rules
like... the Miranda
> rights? Or perhaps the Amnesty International report
on policy brutality
> in then NYPD?
>
>
http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAMR510361996?open&of=ENG-347
>
> Perhaps it was the actions of the NYPD's Internal
Affairs Bureau, which
> was charged with rectifying those problems?
Liberals, every one of them
> - clearly.
>
> No, it must have been all those evil Liberal
pretensions like the Mollen
> Commission that exposed corruption within NYPD, as
well as its inability
> at that time to police itself. Or maybe... well, why
guess? Perhaps you
> can enlighten us as to these "politics and
legalities" that you battle -
> presumably in your second job as a lawmaker. As I
understood it, a
> police officer's job is to _enforce_ the law rather
than make it. But I
> may be mistaken.
>
>
> Vale,
> Caius Minucius Scaevola
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Mater artium necessitas.
> Necessity is the mother of invention.
> -- N/A


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39651 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Some Possible Solutions
Well there were the Back Alley and Taverna but they never seem to have
attracted the same following, probablyl because they do not offer the
stimulative scope of occurrneces on the main list.





Salvete omnes,

I wholeheartedly agree with the idea of a new, different,improved
Forum. I recall that a citizen, a few months ago, took it uponhimself to
establish such a forum, besides this one. His decision drewseveral
critics, partly because the idea had not been sanctioned by thecensors.
I do not know what has become of the forum now, but I supportthe
idea of an official discussion Forum that would not be a Yahoo group.

I have been involved in many online discussions group. All ofthem
were organized according to topic and subject of interest, so that
citizens can sort out what they wish to discuss, and can in fact know
where they are in the discussion.

Who, among our elected officials, is in charge of the Forum? An
official proposal must be made.

Valete bene,

Tit. Afr. Sec. Flamininus










YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on theweb.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an emailto:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










"Politicians are like monkeys: the higher they climb the tree of ambition
the more of their arses you can see" - Pieter Dirg-Uys.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39652 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: American Police protect ALL people, its part of our oath.
Trying to find a proactive cop is akin to finding a
dinosaur alive & well.We turn a blind eye to things to
avoid conflict.IS THAT IN THE PUBLICS BEST INTEREST?

Sometimes, yes. POlicing should involve an understanding of spirit before
letter of the law. But you quoted something earlier that equates you more to
Guard than police, upholding the Law, not protecting citizens (and presumably
the Law is supposed to protect them, but there's no certainty it will). I
think that is a fundamental difference from most modern countris. It would
certainly have been the case in pre-majority South Africaand and in
doctrinaire states like Iran and the remaining Communist. I don't think it's
the case in most liberal democracies. It is one more evididence of a
'continental community outlook' developing through the Americas (maybe not in
Canada) different from that in Europe and hopefully points East. Though some
of those Points seem to have given up on any law other than how the President
got out of bed today altogether now there's no Moscow to keep them under
control.
Caesariensis



"Politicians are like monkeys: the higher they climb the tree of ambition
the more of their arses you can see" - Pieter Dirg-Uys.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39653 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Some Possible Solutions
Salve Caesariensis,

The back alley is rather unique. Sometimes is is quite dormant but
other times it flies like a bat out of hell. Macronational topics
from the USA & Iraq to HBO's Rome are covered. In fairness, I have
to say that the obscene language which put some citizens off hardly
occurs anymore.

Regards,

QSP






--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, me-in-@d... wrote:
>
> Well there were the Back Alley and Taverna but they never seem to
have
> attracted the same following, probablyl because they do not offer
the
> stimulative scope of occurrneces on the main list.
>
>
>
>
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I wholeheartedly agree with the idea of a new,
different,improved
> Forum. I recall that a citizen, a few months ago, took it
uponhimself to
> establish such a forum, besides this one. His decision
drewseveral
> critics, partly because the idea had not been sanctioned by
thecensors.
> I do not know what has become of the forum now, but I supportthe
> idea of an official discussion Forum that would not be a Yahoo
group.
>
> I have been involved in many online discussions group. All
ofthem
> were organized according to topic and subject of interest, so that
> citizens can sort out what they wish to discuss, and can in fact
know
> where they are in the discussion.
>
> Who, among our elected officials, is in charge of the Forum? An
> official proposal must be made.
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Tit. Afr. Sec. Flamininus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on theweb.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an emailto:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Politicians are like monkeys: the higher they climb the
tree of ambition
> the more of their arses you can see" - Pieter Dirg-Uys.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39654 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Some Possible Solutions
I dropped oput of it because it seemed to be going through a very 'incrowd'
time of - again - American politics I knew nothing about and could not have
contributed to. It seems to me that there are alwys two sorts of people in a
list, one that resoponds to a post trying to understand how the writer was
thinking to come up with it, and another reading it as a way of response to
them as a person, as they might mean it, usually as an insult. Those second are
the ones most likely to cause trouble, and having taken and responded to it and
broadcast to everyone else as personal attack, will then start screaming loudly
about 'trolls' and 'off-topic'. You can't get through to them because they do
not realise posting is about understanding more than telling.





Salve Caesariensis,

The back alley is rather unique. Sometimes is is quite dormant but
other times it flies like a bat out of hell. Macronational topics
from the USA & Iraq to HBO's Rome are covered. In fairness, I have
to say that the obscene language which put some citizens off hardly
occurs anymore.

Regards,

QSP






--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, me-in-@d... wrote:
>
> Well there were the Back Alley and Taverna but they never seem to
have
> attracted the same following, probablyl because they do not offer
the
> stimulative scope of occurrneces on the main list.
>
>
>
>
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I wholeheartedly agree with the idea of a new,
different,improved
> Forum. I recall that a citizen, a few months ago, took it
uponhimself to
> establish such a forum, besides this one. His decision
drewseveral
> critics, partly because the idea had not been sanctioned by
thecensors.
> I do not know what has become of the forum now, but I supportthe
> idea of an official discussion Forum that would not be a Yahoo
group.
>
> I have been involved in many online discussions group.All
ofthem
> were organized according to topic and subject of interest, sothat
> citizens can sort out what they wish to discuss, and canin fact
know
> where they are in the discussion.
>
> Who, among our elected officials, is in charge of theForum? An
> official proposal must be made.
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Tit. Afr. Sec. Flamininus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on theweb.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send anemailto:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Politicians are likemonkeys: the higher they climb the
tree of ambition
> the more of their arses you can see" - Pieter Dirg-Uys.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>









YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on theweb.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an emailto:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










"Politicians are like monkeys: the higher they climb the tree of ambition
the more of their arses you can see" - Pieter Dirg-Uys.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39655 From: Maior Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL whither Caesariensis...
M. Hortensia V. Ambrosio Caesariensis sd;
granted you may be shy. But why could not you reply to my
emails? I set up a Provincia Hibernia list to which you were
invited. You could have talked to me, the other cives, or the
present Prop. for a year.

Also why doesn't your phone number work or do you even live at
the address you gave? I should tell you the Lex Salicia is harsh for
cives who give false information.

As for the big event, we went to a small cafe off the main drag &
discussed seeing the Roman ruins in Howth (a suburb above Dublin) I
think there are maybe 4 active cives in Hibernia. This is the kind
of small group you should like.
Nova Roma is not an internet chatroom but a living
organization. Every civis should do at least one real life event.
Marca Hortensia Maior
ex-propratrix of Hibernia

>
> I do not like formal meetings with strangers. This way, I can
choose what
> subjects interest me and avoid which do not. Meetings involve
looking the part,
> dealing with people I don't know from Adam and probably getting
all sorts of
> personal questions I prefer not to involve myself in. When I know
something of
> individuals through information exchange, or what other people
say of them in
> light of what I know about those other people, or through working
together, or
> through observation in an anonymous crowd, then, when they are no
longer
> strangers, I might make some personal contact. Otherwise, I have
always been
> shy.
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39656 From: me-in-@disguise.co.uk Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL whither Caesariensis...
I filed emails for future reference and then found them over and done with by
the time I did refer to them. I'll have to check joining details for the phone
because my address certainly is wrong: I moved about 18 months ago. If you
discussed Howth, then I shall have to get into the Hibernia list and see about
doing Howth. I have been interested in those ruins, question whether thay are
literally Roman or British on Roman pattern. I like world-wide discussions but
I have to admit that I care more for the spirit of Roma - and later Rome at
that - than for recreating magistracies that diudn't work very well at the time
and even had they been modern enough not to develop the way they did, still
would have changed. I always feel Constantione was the Great Disaster because
without his restoration of one-man rule it is just possible that the federal
Empire might have set a precedent for extension to other Augusti and Caesares
and some kind of electoral system





M. Hortensia V. Ambrosio Caesariensis sd;
granted you may be shy. But why could not you reply to my
emails? I set up a Provincia Hibernia list to which you were
invited. You could have talked to me, the other cives, or the
present Prop. for a year.

Also why doesn't your phone number work or do you even live at
the address you gave? I should tell you the Lex Salicia is harsh for
cives who give false information.

As for the big event, we went to a small cafe off the main drag &
discussed seeing the Roman ruins in Howth (a suburb above Dublin) I
think there are maybe 4 active cives in Hibernia. This is the kind
of small group you should like.
Nova Roma is not an internet chatroom but a living
organization. Every civis should do at least one real life event.
Marca Hortensia Maior



"Politicians are like monkeys: the higher they climb the tree of ambition
the more of their arses you can see" - Pieter Dirg-Uys.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39657 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL whither Caesariensis...
---
Salvete M. Hortensia et Omnes:

Just curiosity here. If this poster still a citizen? I don't see
his name in the Civite Album on the website.

Valete,
Pompeia

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia V. Ambrosio Caesariensis sd;
> granted you may be shy. But why could not you reply to my
> emails? I set up a Provincia Hibernia list to which you were
> invited. You could have talked to me, the other cives, or the
> present Prop. for a year.
>
> Also why doesn't your phone number work or do you even live at
> the address you gave? I should tell you the Lex Salicia is harsh
for
> cives who give false information.
>
> As for the big event, we went to a small cafe off the main drag &
> discussed seeing the Roman ruins in Howth (a suburb above Dublin)
I
> think there are maybe 4 active cives in Hibernia. This is the kind
> of small group you should like.
> Nova Roma is not an internet chatroom but a
living
> organization. Every civis should do at least one real life event.
> Marca Hortensia Maior
> ex-propratrix of Hibernia
>
> >
> > I do not like formal meetings with strangers. This way, I can
> choose what
> > subjects interest me and avoid which do not. Meetings involve
> looking the part,
> > dealing with people I don't know from Adam and probably getting
> all sorts of
> > personal questions I prefer not to involve myself in. When I
know
> something of
> > individuals through information exchange, or what other people
> say of them in
> > light of what I know about those other people, or through
working
> together, or
> > through observation in an anonymous crowd, then, when they are
no
> longer
> > strangers, I might make some personal contact. Otherwise, I
have
> always been
> > shy.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >
> >
> > >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39658 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL (Pompeia's Moderation)
---

Salve Quinte Seutoni et Salvete Omnes:

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:

<snip> I've snipped your kind post for brevity and thank you very
much for taking the time to write this on the ML. I'm happy you
appeciated my efforts in 2002. I truly do.

I won't snip this part though, as it is worth repeating, as its
sound food for thought for everyone:
>
>
> Fool me twicw, shame on me!

Ohhhhh, Yeah. Big time.
>
> Oh, we are trying to emulate Republican Rome. Freedom of speech
had
> its limits - the ghosts Of Cicero and so many others who fell to
> Sulla's proscription lists would certainly attest to that.

Interesting point. "Can" vs. "Should" needed to be very carefully
weighed out back then, and often it was not. There was no delete key
to press to undo their mortal mistake.

Vale et gratias,
Pompeia
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39659 From: Maior Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL whither Caesariensis...
Salve Senatrix Strabo;
right you are Po and & mighty shrewd to boot. I purged his name
from the Provincia Hibernia list when I was leaving Hibernia this
March. He did not reply to the Census either, but seems terribly
active on the ML; can you say troll;-)
vale
Marca Hortensia Maior

> ---
> Salvete M. Hortensia et Omnes:
>
> Just curiosity here. If this poster still a citizen? I don't see
> his name in the Civite Album on the website.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39660 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL whither Caesariensis...
Salvete Senatrix Pompeia Minucia Tiberia Strabo et Vibius Ambrosius
Caesariensis!

It seems as if Vibius Ambrosius Caesariensis didn't register as a
citizen during the Census. He is now registered as "Inactive
retired"in the Censorial data base (wrongly as "Citizenship not yet
approved." in the Album Civium as the Album Civium needs
re-organizing).

"Lex Fabia de Censo" says:

"VII. If a citizen fails to respond to the contact attempts, that
person will be considered a "Socius" (Ally), but not a citizen. ...

IX. At any time, a Socius may contact the Censores and ask to regain
his/her Citizenship, which will then be granted unless there are
compelling reasons otherwise."

In such a case he/she will become a capiti censi, if he/she doesn't
pay his/her taxes.

"Lex Vedia de Assidui et Capiti Censi" defines the rights of a capiti
cens and assidui.

I am cc this to You Vibius Ambrosius Caesariensis for your
information and to draw your attention to the above facts. As your
status is already discussed on the ML I think You should know where
You stand. Just drop me a mail and You will be re-registered as a
capiti censi or pay your taxes to the Consular Quaestores and You
will become an assidui.

>Salvete M. Hortensia et Omnes:
>
>Just curiosity here. If this poster still a citizen? I don't see
>his name in the Civite Album on the website.
>
>Valete,
>Pompeia

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFBQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39661 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
---Caesarinis:


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, me-in-@d... wrote:
>
> It's a joke. By definition jokes are off-topic. But what is so
unacceptable or
> offensive?

Pompeia: Well, it wouldn't phase on you for sure, as you spend
countless hours opining on the pros and cons (alot of cons) of large
chunks of the human race, and the sad thing is you are dead serious!

Hey, I would have laughed like hades if this post was in another
time and place, but like you, I view things not by the letter but by
the 'spirit' ...

And
... after a larger than usual volume of posts from Fides which (and
yes, my opinion only) are largely lacking in any Roman content, and
are just his beefing on large chunks of the human race, I do not
exactly conclude that the man is suddenly being complimentary, with
his ambiguous jokes...said jokes can be taken elsewhere, 'in my
humble opinion'.

Once one starts dumping on one race, one religion, one this, one
that and pontificating unsubstantiated appraisals which are merely
opinions and not enshrined 'gospels'(your word), then one is in
effect saying that its entirely ok for folks to start the same stuff
with what he values.

BVI Constitution 'Nova Roma shall approach all other religions with
a syncretistic outlook offering friendship to all paths which
acknowledge the right of those who practise and honour the Religio
Romana to do so and respect the beliefs thereof....

So be careful please, Caesarine with unsubstantiated stereotypical
crustigams of admonishment involving Jews, Israelis, Muslims,
Christians, Mennonites, Moononites and any other group you might
feel doesn't cut it. Besides being just 'not nice', it isn't very
constitutional either.

I hope you atleast respect the Religio. That's not too much to ask,
really.

And that is my constitutionally entitled opinion, whether you agree
with it or not.

Where is your constitutuionally entitled opinion in this forum, by
the way? Well, you_ don't_ really_ have_ one as of this moment, do
you?...I just read from Maior and the Censor to this effect, and
you don't have any citizen rights (Constitution) because you are not
a citizen.

You are istead a Peregrinus... and, legally speaking, here at the
pleasure of the Senate and Populus of Rome. the Yahoo Groups Policy
says so.

You have no citizen'rights' to open forums which can't be touched
content-wise except by reasonable moderation.

You have no citizen rights to provocatio if a magistrate were to
issue an edictum disentitling you to post....



I don't imagine that will happen; the Praetores are far too fair for
that, preferring to give opportunities for change and compromise,
and I am too as a citizen....but I think somebody has to point out
that you don't have the carte blanc in this forum that you might
think you have for your indulgences, and why that is.

Pompeia




Because it features a woman? Because it appears to feature a
> hypocritial Christian - maybe the car and stickers were her
husband's - and this
> is exactly the sort of thing the gospels are full of inreference
to
> self-righteous Pharisees. Sill, maybe. Off-topic, maybe.
Offensive, deserving of
> moderation? Has Robert Mugabe taken over?
> Caesariensis
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve Pompeia, et salvete omnes,
>
> pompeia_minucia_tiberia wrote:
> > ---CENSORES ET PRAETORES SAL.
> [...]
> > This post below is totally unacceptable.
>
> It is. I ask the praetores to place Fides on moderation until
such time
> as he demonstrates that he understands the praetorian edictum
concerning
> posting to the mainlist.
>
> Vale,
>
> Gn. Equitius Marinus
> Censor
>
>
>
>
>
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on theweb.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an emailto:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Politicians are like monkeys: the higher they climb the
tree of ambition
> the more of their arses you can see" - Pieter Dirg-Uys.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39662 From: Gaia Apollonia Silana Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Seeking suggestions
Salvete omnes,

As a new not-quite-Citizen, I am anxious and excited about learning as
much as possible about Roma and being a truly full and participating
Citizen.

So, in that spirit, I am asking for help. Can anyone recommend books
and such about the following that would assist this process:

History...Latin (it has been over 40 years since high school Latin and
I have forgotten much)...Religion and Augury...Arts, Crafts and
Music...Science and Healing...Social structure and family
life...Governance, especially during the early Republic, but continuing
through the time of the Emperor Julian and his attempts to re-instate
traditional Roman Pagan religion.

I am, in my daily life, a musician, poet, artist and Tarot
reader/medium, with a passion for history and the sciences, and would
love to be able to channel my talents and interests in the service of
Nova Roma. So...please help me with titles so that I can comb the used
bookstores and libraries in my area.

With many thanks,
Gaia Apollonia Silana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39663 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Clarification of post #39661
Salvete Omnes:

39661

I view things not *only* by the letter but by the spirit.....

I inadvertently omitted the word 'only' in my last post.

Pompeia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39664 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-11-20
Subject: Re: Seeking suggestions
---Salve Gaia Apollonia et Salvete Omnes:

First off, welcome to Nova Roma.

I'm sure you will be hearing from more than a couple of people here;
we have some accomplished Latinists, historians, law students and
religious scholars, who can provide you with reference materials

There are sodalitates to join, focusing on Latin, Poetry and Prose,
Military, and there is a list which discussed the Religio Romana.

I don't have time tonight, but I'd be happy to assemble you a list
of URL's of sodalitates/discussion lists, but I'd be happy to post
it tomorrow, and maybe somebody else is available to do it sooner.
These groups often have files in their Yahoo websites with plenty of
reference materials.

You might want to check the 'files' and 'links' sections of this
mainlist website. This will provide you with some
downloads/URLS..enough to get you started anyway.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma

Valete
Pompeia






In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaia Apollonia Silana <samantha@e...>
wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> As a new not-quite-Citizen, I am anxious and excited about
learning as
> much as possible about Roma and being a truly full and
participating
> Citizen.
>
> So, in that spirit, I am asking for help. Can anyone recommend
books
> and such about the following that would assist this process:
>
> History...Latin (it has been over 40 years since high school
Latin and
> I have forgotten much)...Religion and Augury...Arts, Crafts and
> Music...Science and Healing...Social structure and family
> life...Governance, especially during the early Republic, but
continuing
> through the time of the Emperor Julian and his attempts to re-
instate
> traditional Roman Pagan religion.
>
> I am, in my daily life, a musician, poet, artist and Tarot
> reader/medium, with a passion for history and the sciences, and
would
> love to be able to channel my talents and interests in the service
of
> Nova Roma. So...please help me with titles so that I can comb the
used
> bookstores and libraries in my area.
>
> With many thanks,
> Gaia Apollonia Silana
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39665 From: Maior Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Seeking suggestions
M. Hortensia Gaiae Apolloniae spd;
welcome to Nova Roma! For Latin I suggest you check Academia
Thules, Aula Tullia Scholastica right now is teaching Latin 1 from
Wheelock, Academia Thules is a fabulous resource with free courses.

For the Religio, go over to the Religio Romana group, we have 3 very
active pontiffs there who are happy to help you get started and
answer your questions. One of them G. Fabius Buteo Modianus is an
auger.

Undoubtedly the best book on Roman Religion is "Roman Religion" by
John Scheid, it is universally recommeded. The other books would
be "Relgions of Rome" vols 1 & 3 by Beard and North. They discuss
politics & the Empire as well.
bene vale
Marca Hortensia Maior



Religion and Augury> With many thanks,
> Gaia Apollonia Silana
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39666 From: Octavius Giraldo-Vay Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Pilate and Jesus
Salvete omnes
There is an investigative report that took 15 years to produce that
clearly shows, with lots of evidence that Christianity originated
from the Cult of Divus Iulius. There is of no wonder Jesus was
nowhere to be found in the historical record, now, backed up by
evidence it is obvious he existed but his name was, the Lord and
saviour, descended from venus, the son of the earth ( Gaius)
Pontifex maximus who resurrected...the god Iulius Caesar! It is all
here. Valete omnes. http://www.carotta.de/subseite/texte/jwc_e/
contents.html
On Oct 31, 2005, at 10:36 PM, me-in-@... wrote:

> I'm not exactly an 'atheist' though I can't believe in Big G on
> a cloud -
> say, the Cosmos kknows what it's doing and that's more than we do!
> Generally I
> side with the Gnostics. But it's just because Christianity has made
> such a fuss
> about its origins and in the end believing what happened matters to
> them far
> more than any teaching, that does make me interested in the
> origins: "The Lady
> doth protest too much". All that Dan Brown stuff and more has been
> around for
> about 15 years. When people start burning each other alive over
> who or what
> started their religion, it's like somebody is pretty desperate to
> push the
> Party Line.
>
>
>
>> Salve,
>>
>> Wow, for an "atheist" you certainly know your stuff about the
>> origins of
>> Christianity amice! Great job. It think that says it all quite
>> clearly and
>> succinctly. The rest is a matter of beliefs. Whether one does or
>> does not,
>> this bit of academic and historical data is indeed impressive.
>> I for one,
>> cannot dispute any of it. It makes a hell of a lot of sense. Thank
>> you!
>>
>> Vires et honos,
>> Marcus Cassius Philippus
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: me-in-@...
>> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 4:53 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pilate and Jesus
>>
>>
>> Putting this her will probably avoid offending Christians.
>> Personally,
>> I
>> put more faith in Gos Thom whether any Jesus spoke it or not.
>> Buddhists
>> would
>> say 'If you meet the Buddha on the Way, kill him' and 'A finger
>> points at
>> the
>> moon, the fool looks at the finger'. That is, whatever the
>> origin, it is
>> the
>> philosophy that matters, not the historicity.
>>
>> All the 'respectable' informants on early Christianity treat the
>> political
>> situation as if in that context 'religious' were entirely
>> divorced from
>> 'political'. Tell that in Tehran, Riyadh and Kabul!
>> It tends to divide into simple pro- and anti- Roman camps
>> ignoring that both
>> Judea and Rome were divided during Herod the Great's rule (and
>> Herod kept
>> his
>> crown and head despite backing the wrong side) and that there
>> were other
>> Powers.
>> Rome came in to settle the Hasmonean civil war and not all
>> 'Jews' supported
>> the
>> Hasmoneans. Samaritans certainly did not since the Hasmoneans
>> destroyed
>> their
>> Temple. It is hard to know what to call these people since the
>> region was
>> not
>> always a single unit (for a time in fact it was absorbed into
>> Syria) and if
>> Samaritans are not Jews, it's doubtful whether Nasoreans
>> (Mandeans) and
>> others
>> are either. 'Are', because these people still exist: the
>> establishement
>> Saddam
>> built for Mandeans - Gnostic followers of John the Baptist who
>> consider
>> Jesus
>> 'anti-Messiah' - is on the Web.
>> We can easily relate the period to Afghanistan and Iran, perhaps
>> better
>> during
>> the 1980s when there was still a Cold War with occasional
>> hotspots. One
>> such
>> hotspot was Carrhae, Harran (Gh'r-Har presumably, GhR meaning
>> City).
>> Early church fathers quote at least two dozen sects active at
>> the 'Neronic'
>> Uprising. All had political overtones, most violent. The Dead
>> Sea Scrolls
>> are
>> strong on Peace but it is the Peace 'Moondog' describes on an
>> album as 'of
>> one
>> who has crushed all opposition'. They differed in detail but all
>> were
>> similar to
>> modern 'Rapturites'. The calendar showed them living in the End
>> Times and
>> politics backed that. Actual calculations were as elaborate as
>> any the
>> Jehovah's
>> Witnesses have achieved since their Apocalypse failed to
>> materialise in
>> 1875.
>> The last possible date coincides with the Br Kokhba Uprising and
>> a period of
>> 'Christian persecution'.
>> 'The Old Fox' Herod was well aware of these sects, a target for
>> some while
>> astute enough to back others. His grandson, Herod Agrippa II did
>> declare
>> himself
>> Messiah - and was 'eaten by worms' for his troubles. The
>> 'allied' kingdoms
>> of
>> Asia Minor during Gospel times were all Herod family business.
>> Jesus was a Nasorean or Nazarene or Nazarite (so was Samson)
>> and we know
>> details about them. I do not subscribe to the theory that he was
>> a Gnostic
>> parable, but that a Gnostic parable was built on him and in the
>> confusion
>> following Masada, immediate Messianic expectations became
>> interpreted
>> otherwise
>> and scripture reworked by those who knew sucessively less of
>> what had
>> happened
>> and more of what should have happened. However, geopolitics
>> before relgious.
>> Herod and those successors he left alive had no reason to assume
>> Rome a
>> lasting power. It had been through almost constant civil war and
>> it must
>> have
>> come hard for Asiatic potentates to acknowledge even monarchical
>> Augustus as
>> overlord through his Republican pretensions. Gospel always
>> refers to Caesar
>> as a
>> monarch. 'Princeps' amounts to 'President' but the life
>> presidency familiar
>> from post-colonial Africa and South America.
>> With the Seleukid and Ptolemaic Empires collapsed into new
>> border states and
>> Ecbatana far away, there was obvious potential for Herod and his
>> descendents
>> to
>> emulate Mithridates IV of Armenia playing both Powers against
>> each other for
>> his
>> own independence. Even nominal Parthian suzerainity left
>> monarchs far more
>> to
>> their own devices than Rome and the Iraqi desert was probably
>> harder to
>> cross
>> than the Mediterranean. Parthia might support intending to
>> restore the
>> Persian
>> Empire but would find it not worth interfering in local affairs
>> thereafter.
>> The story of the Magi is probably true: Herod had killed many of
>> his
>> offspring, he was dying at that time, it would be absolutely
>> essential for
>> border states like Oshroene and Commagene (responsible for
>> Carrhae) to
> know
>> whether he intended successors to jump for Rome, Parthia or a
>> Herodian Asia
>> Minor Empire controlled from Jerusalem. Herod had earlier joined
>> Cleopatra
>> and
>> Antony, perhaps intending to do unto them as they were doing
>> unto Rome. Then
>> again, they were the local Power. Since Augustus was still alive
>> (though
>> having
>> removed almost as many viable successors as Herod) he stayed Roman.
>> If Herod Agrippa was, as some understand, 'poisoned with snake
>> venom', it
>> sounds an unnecessary risk to remove a minor king the legions
>> could move
> in
>> on
>> if they chose. Rome might not even care what he called himself
>> as long as he
>> kept it to Judea. It is not disproportionate if his Apotheosis
>> (for such
>> pagans
>> would recognise it) was a signal for uprising in all the other
>> Herodian
>> kingdoms.
>> There is no evidence for Nazareth before Christians built it
>> where they
>> assumed it should be. There is for the great city of Sepphoris
>> four miles
>> away.
>> If there was a Nazareth (Natsareth - the Z represents Tsaddi,
>> not Zayin
>> which,
>> like original Zeta, may well have sounded more like English J)
>> at all, it
>> may
>> have been a suburb populated by Nazarenes. 'Jesus of Nazareth' is a
>> mistranslation of 'Jesus the Nazarene', a form not used in Greek
>> and Latin:
>> 'Peter of Rome' is 'Petrus Romanus', not 'Petrus Romae'. Vowel
>> marks were
>> not
>> introduced yet and even when they are, gutteral Semitic
>> pronunciation can
>> confuse A and O. Even the modern national airline El Al is
>> written with
>> letters
>> directly equivalent to Al Ol.
>> We know from early writings that Nazarenes by any spelling, but
>> some
>> spellings
>> may have refered to sub-sects, were among the many Galileean
>> and Samarian
>> successors to the post-Solomonic Kingdom of Israel ruled from
>> Hebron who
>> rejected the Masoretic text brought to Jerusalem from Babylon.
>> The Judan
>> exiles
>> did not know they would be returning after sixty years and
>> sought to
>> dissociate
>> themselves from their neighbours and to add oral tradition where
>> not in
>> earlier
>> texts.
>> Our own time shows exiles often more conservative than those
>> left behind in
>> their own culture, sometimes inventing traditions. Young British
>> Indians
>> often
>> find India freer than their British upbringing: it has moved on,
>> their
>> parents
>> have not.
>> We do not know what text Nazarenes used but Christians have
>> always used the
>> Septuagint and all New Testamant quotes are from it. It is a
>> reasonable
>> guess
>> that the Hasmoneans suppressed alternative Hebrew and Aramaic
>> and only
>> translation remained overseas. Why Protestants decided they knew
>> better than
>> St.
>> Paul remains a mystery.
>> Nazarenes kept Jewish festivals (and possibly others frowned
>> upon and may
>> have
>> used an older calendar) but without animal sacrifice and were
>> vegetarian.
>> That
>> was no great deal in the ancient world where meat was a rarity
>> usually
>> obtained
>> from sacrifice and distributed hacked up rather than butchered
>> professionally.
>> Many traditional vegetarians have not counted fish.
>> This puts 'cleansing the Temple' and Peter's vision of 'kill and
>> eat' in a
>> very different light. Does the Greek for 'Robbers' read
>> 'Kleptai' or
>> 'Lehstai',
>> 'Thieves' or 'Bandits'? (And does that in turn reflect the
>> term's use for
>> insurgents?) It explains too the lack of Paschal Lamb if the
>> Last Supper was
>> indeed Passover and by 'shock of contrast' the pagan
>> implications of implied
>> ritual cannibalism.
>> Pilatus is quoted as designating Jesus 'King of Jews',
>> emphatic that he
> did
>> not merely claim that falsely. Gospel, however, refers to him as
>> 'King of
>> Israel' in the line of David, originally ruling from Hebron.
>> Pilatus
>> wouldn't
>> know a Judean from an Israelite but Galileeans would. From their
>> dissent
>> with
>> Jerusalem, it is quite possible that Nazarenes laid a hereditary
>> claim to
>> Israel
>> and let Judah go to its own heresy.
>> That 'Iudaeus' meant 'Judean' within the area but generically
>> 'Jew' outside
>> explains gospel references to 'the Jews': they were not Jews,
>> they were
>> Judeans.
>> Who else would be in Jerusalem - Hottentots? This is not just
>> internal
>> dispute
>> over interpretation, it is on side's record of an old conflict
>> being played
>> out
>> in the extremely volatile 'Last Times'. Even if all agreed that
>> God was
>> about to
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------
> ~-->
> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your
> home page
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/wWQplB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ~->
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39667 From: Gaia Apollonia Silana Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Seeking suggestions
Salve!

Thank you! I will check out the books, write the pontiffs and surf on
over to the websites you mentioned.

This is so exciting!

Vale,
Gaia Apollonia

Maior wrote:

> M. Hortensia Gaiae Apolloniae spd;
> welcome to Nova Roma! For Latin I suggest you check Academia
> Thules, Aula Tullia Scholastica right now is teaching Latin 1 from
> Wheelock, Academia Thules is a fabulous resource with free courses.
>
> For the Religio, go over to the Religio Romana group, we have 3 very
> active pontiffs there who are happy to help you get started and
> answer your questions. One of them G. Fabius Buteo Modianus is an
> auger.
>
> Undoubtedly the best book on Roman Religion is "Roman Religion" by
> John Scheid, it is universally recommeded. The other books would
> be "Relgions of Rome" vols 1 & 3 by Beard and North. They discuss
> politics & the Empire as well.
> bene vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
>
>
> Religion and Augury> With many thanks,
> > Gaia Apollonia Silana
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39668 From: Gaius Licinius Crassus Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL- a Commentary
G Licinius Crassus Omnibus S.P.D.

Since the posting of the original 'Moratorium Proposal' message, I have
resolved to be a bit less hasty in my urge to post my own two sesterces
worth in recent discussions. However, it seems that- quite against the
spirit of the proposal (and it's welcome acceptance by what appears to
be a large segment of the active Forum citizens) has taken, once again,
a tack in the direction of the dreaded Religious Discussion in the body
of the 'Tailgater' post. Granted, it seems the bulk of this discussion
alludes to whether or not the post violates either our own rules and
regulations and/or those of our patient host, Yahoo, but it is beginning
to have the hallmarks of an endless thread of discussion leaning heavily
towards religious freedoms. In the interest of ending what is surely to
become yet another religious war, can a decision be made by someone with
authority on the matter?

I've only been a part of Nova Roma for a few months, and perhaps some of
you know how 'quick on the trigger' I've been to respond to posts having
to do with present-day US politics or religion- both of which are
sure-fire roads to a heated debate during which many harsh words are
passed between citizens and perhaps a few friendships are broken.
Realizing this, I now refrain from commentary for at least a day or so,
and then reflect on whether or not my comments will help the matter,or
merely serve to inflame others even worse.

I urge everyone to simply sit back and take a breath before firing off
with what may be unecessarily harsh words toward another. To disagree
with another's position is one thing, but descending into personal
attacks is another matter and one to be avoided.

I thank you all for your time and indulgence.



Crassus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39669 From: Gaia Apollonia Silana Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Seeking suggestions
Salve Pompeia -

Thank you for the friendly welcome and the suggestions. I have been
checking out the links and would deeply appreciate any you could send to
me, along with any suggestions for books I could read offline. I have
also joined many of the lists and am enjoying greatly the challenge of
translating Latin posts with Very Rusty High School Latin...it is
surprising how much one remembers, even after 40 years.

Vale,
Gaia Apollonia

pompeia_minucia_tiberia wrote:

> ---Salve Gaia Apollonia et Salvete Omnes:
>
> First off, welcome to Nova Roma.
>
> I'm sure you will be hearing from more than a couple of people here;
> we have some accomplished Latinists, historians, law students and
> religious scholars, who can provide you with reference materials
>
> There are sodalitates to join, focusing on Latin, Poetry and Prose,
> Military, and there is a list which discussed the Religio Romana.
>
> I don't have time tonight, but I'd be happy to assemble you a list
> of URL's of sodalitates/discussion lists, but I'd be happy to post
> it tomorrow, and maybe somebody else is available to do it sooner.
> These groups often have files in their Yahoo websites with plenty of
> reference materials.
>
> You might want to check the 'files' and 'links' sections of this
> mainlist website. This will provide you with some
> downloads/URLS..enough to get you started anyway.
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma
>
> Valete
> Pompeia
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaia Apollonia Silana <samantha@e...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > As a new not-quite-Citizen, I am anxious and excited about
> learning as
> > much as possible about Roma and being a truly full and
> participating
> > Citizen.
> >
> > So, in that spirit, I am asking for help. Can anyone recommend
> books
> > and such about the following that would assist this process:
> >
> > History...Latin (it has been over 40 years since high school
> Latin and
> > I have forgotten much)...Religion and Augury...Arts, Crafts and
> > Music...Science and Healing...Social structure and family
> > life...Governance, especially during the early Republic, but
> continuing
> > through the time of the Emperor Julian and his attempts to re-
> instate
> > traditional Roman Pagan religion.
> >
> > I am, in my daily life, a musician, poet, artist and Tarot
> > reader/medium, with a passion for history and the sciences, and
> would
> > love to be able to channel my talents and interests in the service
> of
> > Nova Roma. So...please help me with titles so that I can comb the
> used
> > bookstores and libraries in my area.
> >
> > With many thanks,
> > Gaia Apollonia Silana
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39670 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Seeking suggestions
M. Lucretius Agricola Gaiae Apolloniae Silanae Omnibusque S.P.D.

We also have a nice list called NewRoman at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newroman/ that was set up to help new
citizens get into the Nova Roma "groove".



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaia Apollonia Silana
<samantha@e...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> As a new not-quite-Citizen, I am anxious and excited about
learning as
> much as possible about Roma and being a truly full and participating
> Citizen.
>
> So, in that spirit, I am asking for help. Can anyone recommend books
> and such about the following that would assist this process:
>
> History...Latin (it has been over 40 years since high school Latin
and
> I have forgotten much)...Religion and Augury...Arts, Crafts and
> Music...Science and Healing...Social structure and family
> life...Governance, especially during the early Republic, but continuing
> through the time of the Emperor Julian and his attempts to re-instate
> traditional Roman Pagan religion.
>
> I am, in my daily life, a musician, poet, artist and Tarot
> reader/medium, with a passion for history and the sciences, and would
> love to be able to channel my talents and interests in the service of
> Nova Roma. So...please help me with titles so that I can comb the used
> bookstores and libraries in my area.
>
> With many thanks,
> Gaia Apollonia Silana
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39671 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Pilate and Jesus
Salve Octavi,

Thank you but this site won't open.

The only problem I have with "investigative" reports from CIA
coverups of UFO's, the Illuminate, crop circles and children
sacrificed by satanists is that there is nothing but answering
questions with questions and giving no hard concrete or scientific
evidence. We have had a barrage of these sorts of programs since the
early 80's which have demonstrated little or nothing.

I would just point out that the RC church was always estute enough
over the centuries to allow or keep many vestiges of older religions
to remain in the ceremonies to make the transition easier for the
people they were converting. For example you still see religio
Romano symbols in the mass today, in Mexico there is much Aztec
vestiges and customs incorporated in the Day Of The Dead and other
feast days, African Voodo type symbols in Hati, Brazil etc. Some of
the other Christian churches have accused the RC church of really
being paganism in disguise for incorporating or integrating all
these vestiges. Maybe that has lead to some confusion and theories
like the one you mention.

Anyway see if you can find access to this site and I'll read the
information before commenting further.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus



Regards,

QSP




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Octavius Giraldo-Vay"
<octavius@o...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes
> There is an investigative report that took 15 years to produce
that
> clearly shows, with lots of evidence that Christianity originated
> from the Cult of Divus Iulius. There is of no wonder Jesus was
> nowhere to be found in the historical record, now, backed up by
> evidence it is obvious he existed but his name was, the Lord and
> saviour, descended from venus, the son of the earth ( Gaius)
> Pontifex maximus who resurrected...the god Iulius Caesar! It is
all
> here. Valete omnes. http://www.carotta.de/subseite/texte/jwc_e/
> contents.html
> On Oct 31, 2005, at 10:36 PM, me-in-@... wrote:
>
> > I'm not exactly an 'atheist' though I can't believe in Big G
on
> > a cloud -
> > say, the Cosmos kknows what it's doing and that's more than we
do!
> > Generally I
> > side with the Gnostics. But it's just because Christianity has
made
> > such a fuss
> > about its origins and in the end believing what happened matters
to
> > them far
> > more than any teaching, that does make me interested in the
> > origins: "The Lady
> > doth protest too much". All that Dan Brown stuff and more has
been
> > around for
> > about 15 years. When people start burning each other alive over
> > who or what
> > started their religion, it's like somebody is pretty desperate
to
> > push the
> > Party Line.
> >
> >
> >
> >> Salve,
> >>
> >> Wow, for an "atheist" you certainly know your stuff about the
> >> origins of
> >> Christianity amice! Great job. It think that says it all quite
> >> clearly and
> >> succinctly. The rest is a matter of beliefs. Whether one does
or
> >> does not,
> >> this bit of academic and historical data is indeed
impressive.
> >> I for one,
> >> cannot dispute any of it. It makes a hell of a lot of sense.
Thank
> >> you!
> >>
> >> Vires et honos,
> >> Marcus Cassius Philippus
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: me-in-@...
> >> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> >> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 4:53 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pilate and Jesus
> >>
> >>
> >> Putting this her will probably avoid offending
Christians.
> >> Personally,
> >> I
> >> put more faith in Gos Thom whether any Jesus spoke it or
not.
> >> Buddhists
> >> would
> >> say 'If you meet the Buddha on the Way, kill him' and 'A
finger
> >> points at
> >> the
> >> moon, the fool looks at the finger'. That is, whatever the
> >> origin, it is
> >> the
> >> philosophy that matters, not the historicity.
> >>
> >> All the 'respectable' informants on early Christianity treat
the
> >> political
> >> situation as if in that context 'religious' were entirely
> >> divorced from
> >> 'political'. Tell that in Tehran, Riyadh and Kabul!
> >> It tends to divide into simple pro- and anti- Roman camps
> >> ignoring that both
> >> Judea and Rome were divided during Herod the Great's rule
(and
> >> Herod kept
> >> his
> >> crown and head despite backing the wrong side) and that
there
> >> were other
> >> Powers.
> >> Rome came in to settle the Hasmonean civil war and not all
> >> 'Jews' supported
> >> the
> >> Hasmoneans. Samaritans certainly did not since the
Hasmoneans
> >> destroyed
> >> their
> >> Temple. It is hard to know what to call these people since
the
> >> region was
> >> not
> >> always a single unit (for a time in fact it was absorbed
into
> >> Syria) and if
> >> Samaritans are not Jews, it's doubtful whether Nasoreans
> >> (Mandeans) and
> >> others
> >> are either. 'Are', because these people still exist: the
> >> establishement
> >> Saddam
> >> built for Mandeans - Gnostic followers of John the Baptist
who
> >> consider
> >> Jesus
> >> 'anti-Messiah' - is on the Web.
> >> We can easily relate the period to Afghanistan and Iran,
perhaps
> >> better
> >> during
> >> the 1980s when there was still a Cold War with occasional
> >> hotspots. One
> >> such
> >> hotspot was Carrhae, Harran (Gh'r-Har presumably, GhR
meaning
> >> City).
> >> Early church fathers quote at least two dozen sects active
at
> >> the 'Neronic'
> >> Uprising. All had political overtones, most violent. The
Dead
> >> Sea Scrolls
> >> are
> >> strong on Peace but it is the Peace 'Moondog' describes on
an
> >> album as 'of
> >> one
> >> who has crushed all opposition'. They differed in detail but
all
> >> were
> >> similar to
> >> modern 'Rapturites'. The calendar showed them living in the
End
> >> Times and
> >> politics backed that. Actual calculations were as elaborate
as
> >> any the
> >> Jehovah's
> >> Witnesses have achieved since their Apocalypse failed to
> >> materialise in
> >> 1875.
> >> The last possible date coincides with the Br Kokhba Uprising
and
> >> a period of
> >> 'Christian persecution'.
> >> 'The Old Fox' Herod was well aware of these sects, a target
for
> >> some while
> >> astute enough to back others. His grandson, Herod Agrippa II
did
> >> declare
> >> himself
> >> Messiah - and was 'eaten by worms' for his troubles. The
> >> 'allied' kingdoms
> >> of
> >> Asia Minor during Gospel times were all Herod family business.
> >> Jesus was a Nasorean or Nazarene or Nazarite (so was
Samson)
> >> and we know
> >> details about them. I do not subscribe to the theory that he
was
> >> a Gnostic
> >> parable, but that a Gnostic parable was built on him and in
the
> >> confusion
> >> following Masada, immediate Messianic expectations became
> >> interpreted
> >> otherwise
> >> and scripture reworked by those who knew sucessively less of
> >> what had
> >> happened
> >> and more of what should have happened. However, geopolitics
> >> before relgious.
> >> Herod and those successors he left alive had no reason to
assume
> >> Rome a
> >> lasting power. It had been through almost constant civil war
and
> >> it must
> >> have
> >> come hard for Asiatic potentates to acknowledge even
monarchical
> >> Augustus as
> >> overlord through his Republican pretensions. Gospel always
> >> refers to Caesar
> >> as a
> >> monarch. 'Princeps' amounts to 'President' but the life
> >> presidency familiar
> >> from post-colonial Africa and South America.
> >> With the Seleukid and Ptolemaic Empires collapsed into new
> >> border states and
> >> Ecbatana far away, there was obvious potential for Herod and
his
> >> descendents
> >> to
> >> emulate Mithridates IV of Armenia playing both Powers
against
> >> each other for
> >> his
> >> own independence. Even nominal Parthian suzerainity left
> >> monarchs far more
> >> to
> >> their own devices than Rome and the Iraqi desert was
probably
> >> harder to
> >> cross
> >> than the Mediterranean. Parthia might support intending to
> >> restore the
> >> Persian
> >> Empire but would find it not worth interfering in local
affairs
> >> thereafter.
> >> The story of the Magi is probably true: Herod had killed many
of
> >> his
> >> offspring, he was dying at that time, it would be absolutely
> >> essential for
> >> border states like Oshroene and Commagene (responsible for
> >> Carrhae) to
> > know
> >> whether he intended successors to jump for Rome, Parthia or
a
> >> Herodian Asia
> >> Minor Empire controlled from Jerusalem. Herod had earlier
joined
> >> Cleopatra
> >> and
> >> Antony, perhaps intending to do unto them as they were doing
> >> unto Rome. Then
> >> again, they were the local Power. Since Augustus was still
alive
> >> (though
> >> having
> >> removed almost as many viable successors as Herod) he stayed
Roman.
> >> If Herod Agrippa was, as some understand, 'poisoned with
snake
> >> venom', it
> >> sounds an unnecessary risk to remove a minor king the
legions
> >> could move
> > in
> >> on
> >> if they chose. Rome might not even care what he called
himself
> >> as long as he
> >> kept it to Judea. It is not disproportionate if his
Apotheosis
> >> (for such
> >> pagans
> >> would recognise it) was a signal for uprising in all the
other
> >> Herodian
> >> kingdoms.
> >> There is no evidence for Nazareth before Christians built it
> >> where they
> >> assumed it should be. There is for the great city of
Sepphoris
> >> four miles
> >> away.
> >> If there was a Nazareth (Natsareth - the Z represents
Tsaddi,
> >> not Zayin
> >> which,
> >> like original Zeta, may well have sounded more like English
J)
> >> at all, it
> >> may
> >> have been a suburb populated by Nazarenes. 'Jesus of
Nazareth' is a
> >> mistranslation of 'Jesus the Nazarene', a form not used in
Greek
> >> and Latin:
> >> 'Peter of Rome' is 'Petrus Romanus', not 'Petrus Romae'.
Vowel
> >> marks were
> >> not
> >> introduced yet and even when they are, gutteral Semitic
> >> pronunciation can
> >> confuse A and O. Even the modern national airline El Al is
> >> written with
> >> letters
> >> directly equivalent to Al Ol.
> >> We know from early writings that Nazarenes by any spelling,
but
> >> some
> >> spellings
> >> may have refered to sub-sects, were among the many Galileean
> >> and Samarian
> >> successors to the post-Solomonic Kingdom of Israel ruled
from
> >> Hebron who
> >> rejected the Masoretic text brought to Jerusalem from
Babylon.
> >> The Judan
> >> exiles
> >> did not know they would be returning after sixty years and
> >> sought to
> >> dissociate
> >> themselves from their neighbours and to add oral tradition
where
> >> not in
> >> earlier
> >> texts.
> >> Our own time shows exiles often more conservative than those
> >> left behind in
> >> their own culture, sometimes inventing traditions. Young
British
> >> Indians
> >> often
> >> find India freer than their British upbringing: it has moved
on,
> >> their
> >> parents
> >> have not.
> >> We do not know what text Nazarenes used but Christians have
> >> always used the
> >> Septuagint and all New Testamant quotes are from it. It is a
> >> reasonable
> >> guess
> >> that the Hasmoneans suppressed alternative Hebrew and
Aramaic
> >> and only
> >> translation remained overseas. Why Protestants decided they
knew
> >> better than
> >> St.
> >> Paul remains a mystery.
> >> Nazarenes kept Jewish festivals (and possibly others frowned
> >> upon and may
> >> have
> >> used an older calendar) but without animal sacrifice and
were
> >> vegetarian.
> >> That
> >> was no great deal in the ancient world where meat was a
rarity
> >> usually
> >> obtained
> >> from sacrifice and distributed hacked up rather than butchered
> >> professionally.
> >> Many traditional vegetarians have not counted fish.
> >> This puts 'cleansing the Temple' and Peter's vision of 'kill
and
> >> eat' in a
> >> very different light. Does the Greek for 'Robbers' read
> >> 'Kleptai' or
> >> 'Lehstai',
> >> 'Thieves' or 'Bandits'? (And does that in turn reflect the
> >> term's use for
> >> insurgents?) It explains too the lack of Paschal Lamb if the
> >> Last Supper was
> >> indeed Passover and by 'shock of contrast' the pagan
> >> implications of implied
> >> ritual cannibalism.
> >> Pilatus is quoted as designating Jesus 'King of Jews',
> >> emphatic that he
> > did
> >> not merely claim that falsely. Gospel, however, refers to him
as
> >> 'King of
> >> Israel' in the line of David, originally ruling from Hebron.
> >> Pilatus
> >> wouldn't
> >> know a Judean from an Israelite but Galileeans would. From
their
> >> dissent
> >> with
> >> Jerusalem, it is quite possible that Nazarenes laid a
hereditary
> >> claim to
> >> Israel
> >> and let Judah go to its own heresy.
> >> That 'Iudaeus' meant 'Judean' within the area but
generically
> >> 'Jew' outside
> >> explains gospel references to 'the Jews': they were not
Jews,
> >> they were
> >> Judeans.
> >> Who else would be in Jerusalem - Hottentots? This is not
just
> >> internal
> >> dispute
> >> over interpretation, it is on side's record of an old
conflict
> >> being played
> >> out
> >> in the extremely volatile 'Last Times'. Even if all agreed
that
> >> God was
> >> about to
> >>
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ------------------
--
> > ~-->
> > Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo!
your
> > home page
> > http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/wWQplB/TM
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
---
> > ~->
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39672 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: On entering the Ordo Equester
M. Lucretius Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.

My thanks to the Censores for permitting me to join the Ordo Equester.

I have little to offer you, Citizens, Socii and Guests, but a few
small things with a Roman theme at a CafePress shop at
http://www.cafepress.com/domuslucretius

There are Saturnalia greeting cards and Saturnalia postcards which I
hope will find favor with you. Everything there is set at zero markup
and will stay that way at least until the Ides of December.



I would like to take a moment to say that I hope many more of us will
find a way to contribute to our little Nova Roman economy. I don't
think it needs to be a big thing.

What about a maker of caligae, for example, or someone to make some
nice brass plates for a balteus? Perhaps there is an antiquarian
bookseller here? We have now only a single well-known source for
tunicae, can we not have another? And let us not forget our global
span. Surely postage and time could be saved with suppliers on both
sides of the great ocean.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39673 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Yahoo! Policies FYI....regarding Moderation, 'Off-Topic' post...
In a message dated 11/20/2005 12:10:45 PM Pacific Standard Time,
pompeia_minucia_tiberia@... writes:
It was decided in 2000 that this list needed some
moderation...clearly it was not working.

Indeed it wasn't. It was an experiment that failed.
I was glad to order it re instituted. I believe personal freedom is important
but with freedom comes responsibility, and there in was the reason
why an unmoderated forum failed. People were unwilling to accept
responsibility in moderating themselves.

I'll quickly point out there was never true freedom in speech in Rome either,
so what we are doing is true to history.

Q. Fabius Maximus




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39674 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Seeking suggestions
C. Equitius Cato G. Apolloniae S.P.D.

Salve, Gaia Apollonia

And welcome to the Republic. In addition to the excellent advice of
the Senatrix Pompeia Strabo and the Tribune Marca Hortensia, a good
solid list of source materials might be found in this website under
"Files", in the "Calendar Resources" folder; it contains the vast bulk
of websites and volumes that I have been using to construct the daily
calendar I post. Hope it helps!

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39676 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: a.d. XI Kal. Dec.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem XI Kalendas Decembris; haec dies comitialis est.

"These remonstrances only irritated the Dictator against them instead
of making him more peaceably disposed towards Fabius, and he ordered
them to leave the tribunal. In vain the ushers demanded silence,
neither the Dictator's voice nor those of his officers could be heard
owing to the noise and uproar; at last night put an end to the
conflict as though it had been a battle. The Master of the Horse was
ordered to appear on the following day. As, however, everybody assured
him that Papirius was so upset and embittered by the resistance he had
met with that he would be more furious than ever, Fabius left the camp
secretly and reached Rome in the night. On the advice of his father,
M. Fabius, who had been thrice consul as well as Dictator a meeting of
the senate was at once summoned. Whilst his son was describing to the
senators the violence and injustice of the Dictator, suddenly the
noise of the lictors clearing the way in front of the Senate-house was
heard and the Dictator himself appeared, having followed him up with
some light cavalry as soon as he heard that he had quitted the camp.
Then the contention began again, and Papirius ordered Fabius to be
arrested. Though not only the leaders of the senate but the whole
House sought to deprecate his wrath, he remained unmoved and persisted
in his purpose. Then M. Fabius, the father, said: "Since neither the
authority of the senate nor the years which I, whom you are preparing
to bereave of a son have reached, nor the noble birth and personal
merits of the Master of the Horse whom you yourself appointed, and
entreaties such as have often mitigated the fierceness of human foes
and pacified the anger of offended deities-since none of these move
you-I claim the intervention of the tribunes of the plebs and appeal
to the people. As you are seeking to escape from the judgment which
the army has passed upon you and which the senate is passing now, I
summon you before the one judge who has at all events more power and
authority than your Dictatorship. I shall see whether you will submit
to an appeal to which a Roman king-Tullus Hotilius-submitted." He at
once left the Senate-house for the Assembly. Thither the Dictator also
proceeded with a small party, whilst the Master of the Horse was
accompanied by all the leaders of the senate in a body. They had both
taken their places on the rostra when Papirius ordered Fabius to be
removed to the space below. His father followed him and turned to
Papirius with the remark, "You do well to order us to be removed to a
position from which we can speak as private citizens."

For some time regular debate was out of the question, nothing was
heard but mutual altercations. At last the loud and indignant tones of
the elder Fabius rose above the hubbub as he expatiated on the tyranny
and brutality of Papirius. He himself, he said, had been Dictator, and
not a single person, not a single plebeian, whether centurion or
private soldier, had ever suffered any wrong from him. But Papirius
would wrest victory and triumph from a Roman commander just as he
would from hostile generals. What a difference there was between the
moderation shown by the men of old and this new fashion of ruthless
severity! The Dictator, Quinctius Cincinnatus, rescued the consul, L.
Minucius, from a blockade, and the only punishment he inflicted was to
leave him as second in command of the army. L. Furius, after
expressing his contempt for the age and authority of M. F. Camillus,
incurred a most disgraceful defeat, but Camillus not only checked his
anger for the moment and refrained from putting in his despatches to
the people, or rather to the senate, anything reflecting on his
colleague, but on his return to Rome, after the senate had allowed him
to choose from the consular tribunes one to be associated with him in
his command, he actually chose L. Furius. Why, even the people
themselves, who hold in their hands the sovereign power, have never
allowed their feelings to carry them beyond the imposition of a fine
even where armies have been lost through the foolhardiness or
ignorance of their generals. Never up to this day has a
commander-in-chief been tried for his life because he was defeated.
But now generals who have won victories and earned the most splendid
triumphs are threatened with the rods and axes, a treatment which the
laws of war forbid even to the vanquished. What, he asked, would his
son have suffered if he had met with defeat, been routed and stripped
of his camp? Could that man's rage and violence go beyond scourging
and killing? It was owing to Q. Fabius that the State was offering up
joyous and grateful thanksgivings for victory; it was on his account
that the sacred fanes stood open and prayers and libations were being
offered at the altars, and the smoke of sacrifice was ascending. How
fitting it was that this very man should be stripped and torn with
rods before the eyes of the Roman people, in sight of the Capitol and
the Citadel, in sight of the gods whom he invoked in two battles nor
invoked in vain! What would be the feelings of the army who had won
their victories under his auspices and generalship? What grief would
there be in the Roman camp, what exultation among the enemy! The old
man wept bitterly as he uttered these protests and expostulations,
ever and anon throwing his arms round his son and appealing for help
to gods and men." - Livy, History of Rome 8.33


"Hathor, Lady of Amenty, the Dweller in the Great Land, the Lady of
Ta-Tchesert, the Eye of Ra, the Dweller in his breast, the Beautiful
Face in the Boat of Millions of Years, the Seat of Peace of the doer
of truth, Dweller in the Boat of the favoured ones..." - The Chapter
of Praise of Hathor, Lady of Amenty, The Book of the Dead

In ancient Egypt, today was held in honor of the goddess Hathor.
Hathor originated in predynastic Egypt, around the fourth millenium
B.C. Her name means "house of Horus" and she was originally seen as
the mother of Horus until Isis took the role. Hathor embodied both
creative and destructive powers and when mankind rebelled against Ra,
he sent her to punish them. She took on the form of Sekhmet and was so
caught up in the bloodlust of slaughtering humans that mankind was in
danger of extinction. To stop her, Ra had his servants brew gallons
upon gallons of beer, adding berry juice to make it red. Then, while
she was sleeping, he poured it onto a field near her. Hathor thought
it was blood and so drank it and became drunk. This stopped her
murderous rampage and saved mankind. Hathor became the goddess of
joy, motherhood, and love. She was considered the protectress of
pregnant women and a midwife. She was the patron of all women, no
matter their station in life. As the goddess of music and dancing her
symbol was the sistrum. As a fertility goddess and a goddess of
moisture, Hathor was associated with the inundation of the Nile. In
this aspect she was associated with the Dog-star Sothis whose rising
above the horizon heralded the annual flooding of the Nile. In the
legend of Ra and Hathor she is called the "Eye of Ra."

In later times, when the Osiris cults gained popularity, her role
changed. She now welcomed the arrival of the deceased to the
underworld, dispensing water to the souls of the dead from the
branches of a sycamore and offering them food. Hathor was also
represented as a cow suckling the soul of the dead, thus giving them
sustenance during their mummification, their journey to the judgement
hall, and the weighing of their soul. In the Late Period, dead women
identified themselves with Hathor, as men identified with Osiris.



In ancient Mesoamerica, today was dedicated to the god Quetzalcoatl.
The name "Quetzalcoatl" literally means quetzal-bird snake or serpent
with feathers (Amphitere) of the Quetzal (which implies something
divine or precious) in the Nahuatl language. The meaning of his local
name in other Mesoamerican languages is similar. The Maya knew him as
Kukulkan; the Quiche as Gukumatz. The Feathered Serpent deity was
important in art and religion in most of Mesoamerica for close to
2,000 years, from the Pre-Classic era until the Spanish conquest.
Civilizations worshiping the Feathered Serpent included the Olmec, the
Mixtec, the Toltec, the Aztec, and the Maya.

The worship of Quetzalcoatl sometimes included animal sacrifices, and
in other traditions Quetzalcoatl was said to oppose human sacrifice.
Mesoamerican priests and kings would sometimes take the name of a
deity they were associated with, so Quetzalcoatl and Kukulcan are also
the names of historical persons. The reason being that Quetzalcoatl
called twelve to reign in his stead after he left the people of the
Yucatan. He also called one man, who he gave his rights, priviledges
and powers to administer in his religious duties. This one took on the
name of the Deity, as to show the power had been given to this man.
The name was pronounced differently, to denote this man a mortal, in
contrast to Quetzalcoatl, Kate-Zal, or Kukulcan the God of wind and waves.

One noted Post-Classic Toltec ruler was named Quetzalcoatl; he may be
the same individual as the Kukulcan who invaded Yucatán at about the
same time. The Mixtec also recorded a ruler named for the Feathered
Serpent. In the 10th century a ruler closely associated with
Quetzalcoatl ruled the Toltecs; his name was Topiltzin Ce Acatl
Quetzalcoatl. This ruler was said to be the son of either the great
Chichimeca warrior, Mixcoatl and the Colhuacano woman Chimalman, or of
their descendant. The Toltecs had a dualistic belief system.
Quetzalcoatl's opposite was Tezcatlipoca, who supposedly sent
Quetzalcoatl into exile. Alternatively, he left willingly on a raft of
snakes, promising to return.

When the Aztecs adopted the culture of the Toltecs, they made twin
gods of Tezcatlipoca and Quetzalcoatl, opposite and equal;
Quetzalcoatl was also called White Tezcatlipoca, to contrast him to
the black Tezcatlipoca. Together, they created the world; Tezcatlipoca
lost his foot in that process. The Aztec Emperor Moctezuma II
initially believed the landing of Hernan Cortes in 1519 was
Quetzalcoatl's return. Cortes played off this belief to aid in his
conquest of Mexico.

The exact significance and attributes of Quetzalcoatl varied somewhat
between civilizations and through history. Quetzalcoatl was often
considered the god of the morning star and his twin brother, Xolotl
was the evening star (Venus). As the morning star he was known under
the title Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, which means literally "the lord of
the star of the dawn". He was known as the inventor of books and the
calendar, the giver of maize corn to mankind, and sometime as a symbol
of death and resurrection. Quetzalcoatl was also the patron of the
priests and the title of the Aztec high priest.

Most Mesoamerican beliefs included cycles of worlds. Usually, our
current time was considered the fifth world, the previous four having
been destroyed by flood, fire and the like. Quetzalcoatl allegedly
went to Mictlan, the underworld, and created fifth world-mankind from
the bones of the previous races (with the help of Cihuacoatl), using
his own blood, from a wound in his penis, to imbue the bones with new
life. His own birth, along with his twin Xolotl, was unusual; it was
a virgin birth, born to the goddess Coatlicue.

In Terry Pratchett's Discworld novel "Eric", the people of the Tezumen
Empire worshipped a creature described as a "feathered boa" called
Quezovercoatl.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy, Hathor (http://members.aol.com/egyptart/hathor.html) and
(http://www.homestead.com/wysinger/hathor1.html), Quetzalcoatl (Wikipedia)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39677 From: Marcus Iulius Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Edictum Praetoricium III -- corrections of the minor errors in the
M IVL PERVSIANVS QVIRITIBVS SPD

first off, let me thank the following people for this big step we are making, in order to give the Tabularium a general restyiling. The people who is making this possible are, in primis, Aula Tullia Scholastica for her huge effort along all the year to check all the leges. Then I thank the current and the former NR webmasters, particulary Caius Minucius Scaevola who will make these corrections finally come true.

And now the edictum:

Preface.
This edict outlines the range and scope of corrections of the minor
errors in the Tabularium, in accordance with the Lex Equitia de
Corrigendis Legum Erratis (http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2004-06-02-i.html). No lex shall change in meaning due to these corrections.

1. Management of the replacements.
Caius Minucius Scaevola shall undertake the above mentioned corrections with the assistance of Aula Tullia Scholastica.

2. Re-definition of Titles and Duties

a. the duties previously assigned to the Rogatores are now shared between
the Diribitores and the Custodes.

b. The office of 'Curator Sermonum' is abolished.

3. General changes

a. The name Rogatores shall be replaced by 'Diribitores'.

b. the name 'Magister Aranearius' shall be replaced by 'Curator Aranearius'.

c. the names 'Curator Differum' shall be replaced by 'Editor Commentariorum'.

d. Enumeration shall follow standard practice: Roman cardinal numbers for
headings, capital letters for subheadings, and arabic cardinal numbers
for lists.

e. Spelling errors and incorrect Latin and English grammatical usage in any Lex are to be corrected by the Interpretes after peer review. A Latinist, a Praetor, and the Webmaster must agree on these corrections.

4. Complete list of the leges in the Tabularium (former title of the Lex transcribed when it is changed due to mistakes for incorrect spelling, morphology, syntax or other cause) after the review:

(here Roman cardinal numbers used instead of arabic cardinal numbers)

I. LEX VEDIA DE RATIONE COMITIORVM POPVLI TRIBVTORVM
II. LEX VEDIA DE RATIONE PLEBIS TRIBVTORVM
III. LEX VEDIA DE RATIONE COMITIORVM CENTVRIATORVM
(formerly Lex Vedia de ratione centuriatorum tributorum)
IV. LEX VEDIA DE RATIONE SVFFRAGIORVM
(formerly Lex Vedia de ratione eligium)
V. LEX VEDIA APPARITORIA
VI. LEX VEDIA DE VIGINTISEXVIRIS
(formerly Lex Vedia Vigintisexviri)
VII. LEX VEDIA SENATORIA
VIII. LEX VEDIA TRIBVTARIA
(formerly Lex Vedia Tributorum)
IX. LEX VEDIA CENTVRIATA
X. LEX VEDIA DE RATIONE EDICTORVM
(formerly Lex Vedia de Ratione Edictium)
XI. LEX IVNIA SPATIA CONSVLATVVM CIRCVMSCRIBENDA
(formerly Lex Iunia de Temporum Definitione Consulatuum)
XII. LEX IVNIA CORNELIA DE PATRVMFAMILIARVM MATRVMFAMILIARVMQVE AETATE (formerly Lex Iunia Cornelia de Patrumfamiliae Matrumfamilaeque Aetate)
XIII. LEX IVNIA DE IVSIVRANDO
XIV. LEX IVNIA CENTVRIATA
XV. LEX CORNELIA DE TEMPORE PVBLICO CONSTITVENDO
(formerly Lex Cornelia Centuriata)
XVI. LEX GRYLLA DE MAGISTRATIBVS PLEBIS CREANDIS
(formerly Lex Grylla de securandis magistratus plebis)
XVII. LEX CORNELIA DE PRIVATIS REBVS
(formerly Lex Cornelia de Privatus Rebus)
XVIII. LEX IVNIA DE MAGISTRATVVM AETATE
XIX. LEX IVNIA CORNELIA
XX. LEX IVNIA CORNELIA DE RATIONE SVFFRAGIORVM
(formerly Lex Iunia Cornelia de ratione eligium)
XXI. LEX IVNIA CENTVRIATA
XXII. LEX FABIA DE EPISTVLIS INTERRETIALIBVS
XXIII LEX MINVCIA DE ROGATORIBVS
XXIV. LEX VEDIA DE MAGISTRATVVM AETATE
(formerly Lex Vedia de Magistratum etate)
XXV. LEX VEDIA DE RATIONE AVTOMATARIA
(formerly Lex Vedia de Ratione Automata)
XXVI. LEX VEDIA DE CIVITATIS PETITIONIBUS PER SUFFRAGIA
(formerly Lex Vedia de Civitatis Petitionibus inter Suffragia )
XXVII. LEX VEDIA ALTERA DE RATIONE EDICTORVM
(formerly Lex Vedia de Ratione Edictium)
XXVIII. LEX VEDIA DE CVRSV HONORVM
(formerly Lex Vedia de Curso Honorum)
XIX. LEX LABIENA DE IVRE EDICENDI VIGINTISEXVIRIS
(formerly Lex Labienia de Edictium Vigintisexviris)
XXX. LEX VEDIA DE RATIONE COMITIORVM POPVLI TRIBVTORVM
XXXI. LEX CORNELIA ET MARIA DE CIVITATE EIVRANDA
XXXII. LEX CORNELIA ET MARIA DE MVTANDIS NOMINIBVS
XXXIII. LEX VEDIA DE ASSIDVIS ET CAPITE CENSIS
(formerly Lex Vedia de assidui et capiti censi)
XXXIV. LEX VEDIA DE PRIVATIS REBVS
XXXV. LEX VEDIA DE RATIONE COMITIORVM CENTVRIATORVM
XXXVI. LEX VEDIA DE PROVINCIIS
XXXVII. LEX VEDIA DE INCORPORATIONIS
(formerly Lex Vedia de incorporatonis)
XXXVIII.LEX CASSIA DE CREATIONE SODALITATVM
XXIX. LEX CASSIA DE IVSIVRANDO
(formerly Lex Cassia de iurisiurando)
XL. LEX VEDIA DE TRIBVNIS
(formerly Lex Vedia de tribuni)
XLI. LEX VEDIA DE LIBERIS CIVIVM
(formerly Lex Vedia de Liberus Civium)
XLII. LEX LABIENA DE INTERCESSIONE
XLII. LEX CORNELIA DE TABVLIS GENTIVM NOVAROMANARVM AGENDIS
XLIII. LEX CORNELIA DE LINGVIS PVBLICIS
XLIV. LEX CORNELIA DE DEFINITIONE INTERVALLORVM MAGISTRATVVM
(formerly Lex Cornelia de deinitone magistratuum).
XLV. LEX OCTAVIA DE SENATORIBVS
XLVI. LEX CORNELIA DE REBVS ORDINIS EQVESTRIS AGENDIS
XLVII LEX CASSIA OCTAVIA DE RATIONE COMITIORVM CENTVRIATORVM
XLVIII. LEX OCTAVIA DE SERMONE
XLIX. LEX OCTAVIA DE COMITIIS CENTVRIATIS
(formerly Lex Octavia de Centuriata')
L. LEX OCTAVIA DE PRIVATIS REBVS
(formerly Lex Octavia de privatus)
LI. LEX OCTAVIA ALTERA DE COMITIIS CENTVRIATIS
(formerly Lex Secunda Octavia de Centuriata)
LII. LEX SALICIA DE PROROGATIONE ET CVMVLATIONE
LIII. LEX OCTAVIA DE RATIONE COMITIORVM CENTVRIATORVM
LIV. LEX CORNELIA DE CENSV
(formerly Lex Cornelia de censo)
LV. LEX SALICIA DE SVFFRAGIIS IN COMITIIS POPVLI TRIBVTIS
(formerly Lex Salicia de Suffragiis in Comitia Populi Tributa)
LVI. LEX CORNELIA IVNIA DE DEFINITIONE.
LVII. LEX SALICIA IVDICIARIA
LVIII. LEX SALICIA DE CONVOCATIONE TRIBVNICIA COMITIORVM
(formerly Lex Salicia de Tribunicia Comitiorum Convocatione)
LVIX. LEX ARMINIA DE RATIONE EDICTIS
(formerly Lex Arminia De Rationem Edictibus)
LX. LEX SALICIA DE CONVOCATIONE TRIBVNICIA COMITIORVM
(formerly Lex Salicia de Tribunicia Comitiorum Convocatione)
LXI. LEX CORNELIA OCTAVIA DE ASSIDVIS ET CAPITE CENSIS
(formerly Lex Cornelia Octavia de Assiduis et Capite Censis)
LXII. LEX FABIA DE CENSU
(formerly Lex Fabia 'de censo')
LXIII. LEX FABIA DE RATIONE COMITIORVM CENTVRIATORVM
LXIV. LEX LABIENA DE PRAETORIBVS AGENDIS IN LOCO PARENTIVM
LXV. LEX LABIENA DE CVSTODIA PERPETVA FORI
LXVI. LEX FABIA DE OPPIDIS ET MVNICIPIIS
LXVII LEX SALICIA POENALIS
LXVIII. LEX DIDIA GEMINA SCEPTIA DE POTESTATE TRIBVNICIA
LXIX. LEX MORAVIA DE RENVNTIATIONE SENATVS ACTORVM
(formerly 'Lex Moravia Aventina de Renuntio Senatus')
LXX. LEX MORAVIA DE SVFFRAGIIS IN COMITIIS PLEBIS TRIBVTIS ET RATIONE COMITIORVM PLEBIS TRIBVTORVM
(formerly Lex Moravia Aventina de suffragiis plebis in Comitia Plebis Tributa)
LXXI. LEX FABIA DE RATIONE COMITIORVM POPVLI TRIBVTORVM
LXXII. LEX FABIA CENTVRIATA
LXIII. LEX LABIENA DE CIVIVM IVRE.
LXXIV. LEX LABIENA DE GENTIBVS
LXXV. LEX FABIA LABIENA DE IVRE AVGVRVM
LXXVI. LEX LABIENA DE OBNVNTIATIONE
LXXVII LEX EQVITIA DE CORRIGENDIS LEGVM ERRATIS
LXXVIII .LEX ARMINIA DE CVRSV HONORVM
(formerly Lex Arminia de curso honorum)
LXXIX. LEX ARMINIA DE MINISTRIS PROVINCIALIBVS
LXXX. LEX ARMINIA SENATORIA
LXXXI. LEX ARMINIA DE OFFICIIS AEDILIVM PLEBIS
LXXXII. LEX ARMINIA DE RATIONE COMITIORVM PLEBIS TRIBVTORVM
LXXXIII. LEX EQVITIA GALERIA DE ORDINARIIS
LXXXIV. LEX ARMINIA EQVITIA DE DIGNITATE CVRVLI
LXXXV. LEX ARMINIA DE FOVENDA LINGVA LATINA
LXXXVI. LEX ARMINIA EQVITIA DE IMPERIO
LXXXVII. LEX ARMINIA DE LEVANDIS CENSORVM ONERIBVS
LXXXVIII. LEX ARMINIA DE MINISTRIS TRIBVNORVM
LXXXIX. LEX ARMINIA DE POTESTATE TRIBVNICIA AD COMITIA CONVOCANDA
LXC. LEX EQVITIA DE MVTANDIS APPELLATIONIBVS DVORVM MAGISTRATVVM MINORVM
LXCI. LEX ARMINIA EQVITIA DE SANCTITATE
LXCII. LEX ARMINIA DE SVFFRAGIIS IN COMITIIS TRIBVTIS
(formerly Lex Arminia de suffragiis in comitiis tributiis)
LXCIII. LEX EQVITIA DE CONSTITVTIONE CORRIGENDA
LXCIV. LEX EQVITIA DE GENTIBVS
LXCV. LEX EQVITIA DE TIROCINIO CIVIVM NOVORVM.
LXCVI. LEX EQVITIA DE CIVITATE EIVRANDA
LXCVII. LEX EQVITIA DE VIGINTISEXVIRIS
LXCVIII.LEX EQVITIA DE FAMILIA
(formerly Lex Equitia familiaris)
LXCIX. LEX EQVITIA DE IVRISDICTIONE


valete




M·IVL·PERVSIANVS
------------------------------
Senator et Praetor Novae Romae·Vicarius
Propraetoris Italiae·Aedilis Urbis·
-----------------------------------------
http://www.geocities.com/m_iulius
http://italia.novaroma.org/signaromanorum
http://italia.novaroma.org/nri/index.htm
------------------------------------------------
SEMPER AD LATVS·TERRAS PERMVLCES·COMITARIS VITAS

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39678 From: A.M. Nelson Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: (fwd) Tailgater
Apparently, humor about human nature is not very Roman.

Personally, and this is me only...I liked having the reminder that my actions are what actually proclaim what I am. That is what the joke really says. I was glad to read it.

G. Iulia Felix



----- Original Message -----
From: me-in-@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 1:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: (fwd) Tailgater


It's a joke. By definition jokes are off-topic. But what is so unacceptable or
offensive? Because it features a woman? Because it appears to feature a
hypocritial Christian - maybe the car and stickers were her husband's - and this
is exactly the sort of thing the gospels are full of inreference to
self-righteous Pharisees. Sill, maybe. Off-topic, maybe. Offensive, deserving of
moderation? Has Robert Mugabe taken over?
Caesariensis





Salve Pompeia, et salvete omnes,

pompeia_minucia_tiberia wrote:
> ---CENSORES ET PRAETORES SAL.
[...]
> This post below is totally unacceptable.

It is. I ask the praetores to place Fides on moderation until such time
as he demonstrates that he understands the praetorian edictum concerning
posting to the mainlist.

Vale,

Gn. Equitius Marinus
Censor






YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on theweb.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an emailto:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










"Politicians are like monkeys: the higher they climb the tree of ambition
the more of their arses you can see" - Pieter Dirg-Uys.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
Roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39679 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: American Police protect ALL people, its part of our oath.
On 11/20/05, annia@... <annia@...> wrote:
>
> Who cares? Stop bitching. Both of you.

Excuse me - i might bitch, indeed I've frequently been know to - but Caius
Minucius Scaevola is the one voice of reason I've heard lately. i totally
admire everything he's said. So, in the interests of common decency, please
don't try to shut him up.
Flavia Lucilla Merulla


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39680 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: American Police protect ALL people, its part of our oath.
Salve, Flavia Lucilla Merulla; salvete, omnes.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 12:25:09PM +0000, Kirsteen Wright wrote:
> On 11/20/05, annia@... <annia@...> wrote:
> >
> > Who cares? Stop bitching. Both of you.
>
> Excuse me - i might bitch, indeed I've frequently been know to - but Caius
> Minucius Scaevola is the one voice of reason I've heard lately. i totally
> admire everything he's said. So, in the interests of common decency, please
> don't try to shut him up.

Thank you for your kind words, amica; they're truly appreciated. As to
the post to which you've responded, I've given it exactly the time and
the consideration that it deserved, in equal amounts. :)


Vale et valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Melius frangi quam flecti.
It is better to break than to bend.
-- N/A
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39681 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Seeking suggestions
Salve Silana,

Welcome to our messy little republic :-) I would recommend that you look into the Academia Thules on the Nova Roma website for the next offering of basic Latin. I am currently in this class and it is very challenging. I too have been away from highschool Latin for decades and forgot almost all of it.

As for the history. There are many chronicles of Roman History out there but in my opinion one of the best places to start is with some good and historically accurate fiction. Colleen McCullough's six volume "Masters Of Rome" series is great. Ms. McCullough recently helped judged Nova Roma's international short story contest so I guess I'm not the only one around here who holds her in great esteem. Her 6 books chronicle Roman politics from 100 BCE with Marius's campaigns to the battles at Philippi in 42 BCE where Octavian and Antonius finally defeat the Boni (the assassins of Gaius Iulius Caesar). A great read, historically correct to a very great extent and it will give you a good foundation in Republican Roma which is precisely what our little republic is supposed to mimic.

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
Miles Legio III Cyrenaica - Legatus Regio Maine - Civis Provincia Nova Britannia / SPQNR
www.northerncrane.net

----- Original message -----
From: Gaia Apollonia Silana
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 9:34 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Seeking suggestions


Salvete omnes,

As a new not-quite-Citizen, I am anxious and excited about learning as
much as possible about Roma and being a truly full and participating
Citizen.

So, in that spirit, I am asking for help. Can anyone recommend books
and such about the following that would assist this process:

History...Latin (it has been over 40 years since high school Latin and
I have forgotten much)...Religion and Augury...Arts, Crafts and
Music...Science and Healing...Social structure and family
life...Governance, especially during the early Republic, but continuing
through the time of the Emperor Julian and his attempts to re-instate
traditional Roman Pagan religion.

I am, in my daily life, a musician, poet, artist and Tarot
reader/medium, with a passion for history and the sciences, and would
love to be able to channel my talents and interests in the service of
Nova Roma. So...please help me with titles so that I can comb the used
bookstores and libraries in my area.

With many thanks,
Gaia Apollonia Silana





SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
Roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/176 - Release Date: 11/20/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39682 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: NR, Roma and Dogs of War
G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana omnes SPD.

[long post]

The previous 250 messages prompt me to post this now. I think
it is relevant as it stems from Roman history, and relates to
the modern attitudes incorporated into the Declaratio of NR,
and other material on the main website.

NR has decided that it supports equality between people:
slavery was Roman, but is not Nova Roman; women could not
hold political office in the Republic, but can in NR, etc.

I'm asking that any cives who care about animals, give some
thought to the following article. Perhaps in your macro life
you might wish to take action, even if just by learning more
about the subject.

We do have our virtual blood sports in NR, but they are
*virtual*. I have just particpated in my second Ludi.
Executed (pun intended) with some thought, the virtual Ludi
can teach us all one truth I learned during 13 years of martial
arts in Japan: If you truly understand violence, you cannot
be a violent person.

However, just like human slavery, *real* animal blood sports
are still very much a part of our *real* world. Is NR
ready to tuck real-world animal blood sports into the same
round file as real-world slavery, and say we officially do
not condone them?

With the closing of our most recent Ludi, now seems a good
time to broach the topic.


===============================================================

EXPOSING THE DOG-FIGHTING UNDERWORLD
by Dr. Stanley Coren

In ancient Rome, beginning with Emperor Lucullus, the Colosseum
combats featured not only human gladiators, but also a variety
of animals pitted against one another. The Roman invasion
and occupation of Britain was motivated, in part, by the fact
that large powerful dogs (namely Irish wolfhounds and Scottish
deerhounds) could be found there. Many of these dogs were sent
to Rome to die in the arena.

The Romans introduced similar sports into Britain. Long after
Rome had fallen, bull and bear baiting, in which a dog was
placed in a "pit" or dug-out ring to combat a bull or bear,
were popular. These sports appealed not only to the masses,
but also to aristocrats.

Humane groups rallied against the cruelty of pit fights, and
in 1835 an act of parliament outlawed baiting sports. After
the ban, the owners of "bulldogs," the name given to dogs used
to bait bulls, bears and other animals, began to stage fights
between two dogs to satisfy the demand for blood sports and
gambling. Dogfighting soon moved to the Americas, but by the
early 20th century Canada and most states had banned these
activities.

If dogfights are illegal, and merely a cruel sport of the
past, why should we worry today? Because, unfortunately,
dogfighting has not disappeared. Several years ago, I
accompanied a man associated with the Michigan Humane Society
to such an event. He was gathering information on dogfighting
in and around Detroit to provide to the authorities.

Around 150 people gathered in a vacant auto-repair garage,
in which a ring with low plywood walls had been assembled.
the pre-fight ritual began with weighing the dogs (they must
not differ by more than a couple of pounds) and then the dogs
were washed with soapy water to remove any drugs or poison
that may have been placed on their fur to harm their opponent.
The rules of the fight are ancient -- the dogs fight until
one is too injured to continue or alternatively turns and
runs in defeat. The fight I saw lasted more than 45 minutes,
with spectators making bids in the thousands of dollars.

My associate informed me that there was a Canadian connection:
"Staging dogfights or training dogs for fighting is illegal
in all U.S. states. Although dogfighting is illegal in
Canada, training dogs for fighting is not, so many of the dogs
we see here were bought and trained in Southern Ontario and
British Columbia."

As we left the blood-spattered ring, we passed a pickup truck
that contained the dog who lost the fight. He was no longer
breathing. I wondered, sadly, about how little moral progress
some humans have made since he days of the Roman gladiators.

(Dr. Stanley Coren is a Professor of Psychology at the
University of British Columbia and author of many books
on dogs. His website is www.stanleycoren.com)

source: ANIMAL SENSE magazine, Fall/Winter 2005, page 19.
published by BCSPCA, website: www.spca.bc.ca

=============================================================

Dogfighting is also definitely alive and kicking in Japan,
where I lived for 13 years. (Ohayo, sensei Phil.) A friend
of mine who was a Japanese police officer (mature, family man
with kids, etc.) showed me his photos and memorabilia from a
fight event he attended on Shikoku Island (I don't think he
had taken his teen-aged son along). The dogs favored are the
Tosa-inu; they are huge animals, and bred for violence.
The system is well established, and the dogs are ranked like
sumo wrestlers, with the yokozuna ("grand champion") even
being decked out in the huge straw rope of victory like a
human yokozuna. The particular yokozuna-inu featured on the
full-colour glossy ticket stub, looked like an advertisement
for a zipper company. Its chest and flanks were criss-crossed
by long, deep scar-lines where it had been repeatedly stitched
back together.

And that's just one example of the survival of animal blood
sports.

So there you have it. The Roman heritage includes blood sports,
slavery, and exclusion of women from public office. NR
officially varies from historical precedent on two of those
counts. Is NR willing to take an official stance on real-world
blood sports, in the same way it has taken an official stance on
slavery and women's right to hold office?

Thanks for taking the time to read this lengthy post.

Valete bene in pace Deorum.

G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39683 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: NR, Roma and Dogs of War
Salve Silvana,

I agree, Nova Roma should not condone animal cruelty. We are a much more enlightened republic than the ancient one. I am curious, (and off topic - so please reply off list if you want) what martial art did you study in Japan. I am always interested in knowing people who are obsessed ;-) with both Oriental as well as Occidental arts & history as I am. I come late to Rome but have spent my whole life studying the Oriental Arts. I have been studying Okinawan and Japanese martial arts since 1966, with dan ranks in Matsumura Shorinryu, Shotokan, Gojuryu, & Kenpojujutsu.

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
www.northerncrane.net
----- Original Message -----
From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 8:32 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] NR, Roma and Dogs of War


G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana omnes SPD.

[long post]

The previous 250 messages prompt me to post this now. I think
it is relevant as it stems from Roman history, and relates to
the modern attitudes incorporated into the Declaratio of NR,
and other material on the main website.

NR has decided that it supports equality between people:
slavery was Roman, but is not Nova Roman; women could not
hold political office in the Republic, but can in NR, etc.

I'm asking that any cives who care about animals, give some
thought to the following article. Perhaps in your macro life
you might wish to take action, even if just by learning more
about the subject.

We do have our virtual blood sports in NR, but they are
*virtual*. I have just particpated in my second Ludi.
Executed (pun intended) with some thought, the virtual Ludi
can teach us all one truth I learned during 13 years of martial
arts in Japan: If you truly understand violence, you cannot
be a violent person.

However, just like human slavery, *real* animal blood sports
are still very much a part of our *real* world. Is NR
ready to tuck real-world animal blood sports into the same
round file as real-world slavery, and say we officially do
not condone them?

With the closing of our most recent Ludi, now seems a good
time to broach the topic.


===============================================================

EXPOSING THE DOG-FIGHTING UNDERWORLD
by Dr. Stanley Coren

In ancient Rome, beginning with Emperor Lucullus, the Colosseum
combats featured not only human gladiators, but also a variety
of animals pitted against one another. The Roman invasion
and occupation of Britain was motivated, in part, by the fact
that large powerful dogs (namely Irish wolfhounds and Scottish
deerhounds) could be found there. Many of these dogs were sent
to Rome to die in the arena.

The Romans introduced similar sports into Britain. Long after
Rome had fallen, bull and bear baiting, in which a dog was
placed in a "pit" or dug-out ring to combat a bull or bear,
were popular. These sports appealed not only to the masses,
but also to aristocrats.

Humane groups rallied against the cruelty of pit fights, and
in 1835 an act of parliament outlawed baiting sports. After
the ban, the owners of "bulldogs," the name given to dogs used
to bait bulls, bears and other animals, began to stage fights
between two dogs to satisfy the demand for blood sports and
gambling. Dogfighting soon moved to the Americas, but by the
early 20th century Canada and most states had banned these
activities.

If dogfights are illegal, and merely a cruel sport of the
past, why should we worry today? Because, unfortunately,
dogfighting has not disappeared. Several years ago, I
accompanied a man associated with the Michigan Humane Society
to such an event. He was gathering information on dogfighting
in and around Detroit to provide to the authorities.

Around 150 people gathered in a vacant auto-repair garage,
in which a ring with low plywood walls had been assembled.
the pre-fight ritual began with weighing the dogs (they must
not differ by more than a couple of pounds) and then the dogs
were washed with soapy water to remove any drugs or poison
that may have been placed on their fur to harm their opponent.
The rules of the fight are ancient -- the dogs fight until
one is too injured to continue or alternatively turns and
runs in defeat. The fight I saw lasted more than 45 minutes,
with spectators making bids in the thousands of dollars.

My associate informed me that there was a Canadian connection:
"Staging dogfights or training dogs for fighting is illegal
in all U.S. states. Although dogfighting is illegal in
Canada, training dogs for fighting is not, so many of the dogs
we see here were bought and trained in Southern Ontario and
British Columbia."

As we left the blood-spattered ring, we passed a pickup truck
that contained the dog who lost the fight. He was no longer
breathing. I wondered, sadly, about how little moral progress
some humans have made since he days of the Roman gladiators.

(Dr. Stanley Coren is a Professor of Psychology at the
University of British Columbia and author of many books
on dogs. His website is www.stanleycoren.com)

source: ANIMAL SENSE magazine, Fall/Winter 2005, page 19.
published by BCSPCA, website: www.spca.bc.ca

=============================================================

Dogfighting is also definitely alive and kicking in Japan,
where I lived for 13 years. (Ohayo, sensei Phil.) A friend
of mine who was a Japanese police officer (mature, family man
with kids, etc.) showed me his photos and memorabilia from a
fight event he attended on Shikoku Island (I don't think he
had taken his teen-aged son along). The dogs favored are the
Tosa-inu; they are huge animals, and bred for violence.
The system is well established, and the dogs are ranked like
sumo wrestlers, with the yokozuna ("grand champion") even
being decked out in the huge straw rope of victory like a
human yokozuna. The particular yokozuna-inu featured on the
full-colour glossy ticket stub, looked like an advertisement
for a zipper company. Its chest and flanks were criss-crossed
by long, deep scar-lines where it had been repeatedly stitched
back together.

And that's just one example of the survival of animal blood
sports.

So there you have it. The Roman heritage includes blood sports,
slavery, and exclusion of women from public office. NR
officially varies from historical precedent on two of those
counts. Is NR willing to take an official stance on real-world
blood sports, in the same way it has taken an official stance on
slavery and women's right to hold office?

Thanks for taking the time to read this lengthy post.

Valete bene in pace Deorum.

G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana









SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
Roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/176 - Release Date: 11/20/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39684 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: American Police protect ALL people, its part of our oath.
It may seem like the voice of reason to you, but I only saw two guys
sardonically bickering back and forth off on a tangent. I call 'em as I see
'em.

Vale,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kirsteen Wright" <kirsteen.falconsfan@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 7:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] American Police protect ALL people, its part of our
oath.


> On 11/20/05, annia@... <annia@...> wrote:
>>
>> Who cares? Stop bitching. Both of you.
>
> Excuse me - i might bitch, indeed I've frequently been know to - but Caius
> Minucius Scaevola is the one voice of reason I've heard lately. i totally
> admire everything he's said. So, in the interests of common decency,
> please
> don't try to shut him up.
> Flavia Lucilla Merulla
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39685 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: American Police protect ALL people, its part of our oath.
On 11/21/05, annia@... <annia@...> wrote:
>
> It may seem like the voice of reason to you, but I only saw two guys
> sardonically bickering back and forth off on a tangent.

Well I'm proud to say that's where we differ but, hey, as a wristband I was
given by one of our Police departments says "Diversity matters"
Flavia Lucilla Merula


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39686 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetoricium III -- corrections of the minor errors in
A. Apollonius M. Julio omnibusque sal.

Wow! Impressive work! Many thanks to you and your
assistants.

Only one question:

> LXCVIII.LEX EQVITIA DE FAMILIA
> (formerly Lex Equitia familiaris)

Shouldn't this be the other way round? It was
originally called the lex de familia.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39687 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Seeking suggestions
A. Apollonius C. Apolloniae omnibsque sal.

Salve, welcome!

> So, in that spirit, I am asking for help. Can
> anyone recommend books
> and such about the following that would assist this
> process:
>
> History...

Blimey! The short answer is "yes". What are you
interested in, history-wise? Feel free to reply
privately if you prefer.





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39688 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL
A. Apollonius C. Equitio omnibusque sal.

Ah, it's the old problem, isn't it? I quite agree with
you that we should be free in this forum to say more
or less whatever we like. I also value my freedom to
say "this is very boring, please stop talking about
it"; and likewise I value your freedom to say, "no,
I'll talk about what I please, thank you very much",
and so on... :)



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39689 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
A. Apollonius T. Octavio omnibusque sal.

Hmmm... I found 3,000 words too little, you found it
too much... you won, I didn't... perhaps I should
learn something here...

;)



___________________________________________________________
WIN ONE OF THREE YAHOO! VESPAS - Enter now! - http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/features/competitions/vespa.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39690 From: Caius Curius Saturninus Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: calendars - on sale during december
Salvete omnes,

Just to confirm that I and Emilia will produce calendar for 2006 for
Nova Romani. Details are still open, but be assured that calendar
will be on sale during December, unless something very unexpected
happens.

Valete,

Caius Curius Saturninus

Tribunus Plebis
Propraetor Provinciae Thules
Procurator Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org
gsm: +358-50-3315279
fax: +358-9-8754751





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39691 From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: MORATORIUM PROPOSAL- a Commentary
avete quirites et Crasse

> In the interest of ending what is surely to become yet another >
religious war, can a decision be made by someone with
> authority on the matter?

let me make clear what's my opinion on the matter, as some of you
seems to wonder. According to what I said during the NR Conventus in
Europa (which, of course, was not an official proclaim and you all are
not obliged to know/remember) and what will be clear in the text of a
Lex governing the Main List (or Forum), I am absolutely against
moderating this list shutting up mouths when they speak WITH COURTESY,
NOT OFFENDING OTHER PEOPLE OR RELIGIONS OR SIMILAR (not shouting).

So, it is my thought to cancel the division between what is IN or what
is OFF-TOPIC as, as many of you have taken as an example, one could
freely walk in the Forum and hear any kind of discussions. But, maybe
differently from the ancient time ALWAYS IN TERM OF EDUCATION. Me and
the staff that is helping me, are focused mainly on this duty, also as
it would be impossible (trust me, I learnt both from reading ALL the
messages along the year and drawing this new lex) to consider what is
In and what is Out.

Again, soon I'll be back in the Contio presenting the text of this law
which try to treat this delicate argument.

thank you
M IVL PERVSIANVS
Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39692 From: lucius_fidelius Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Article on the Getty Villa in California
In new Getty Villa, a nod to Old World
By Nicolai Ouroussoff The New York Times

MALIBU, California Ducked into a narrow ravine above the Pacific
Coast Highway, the Getty Villa, a faux-Roman retreat brimming with
real Greco-Roman antiquities, has always drawn strong reactions.
Built in the 1970s by an eccentric mogul, it was derided by aesthetes
as a vulgar display of personal vanity. But the public was entranced
by its splendor and continued to flock there until the villa closed
for renovations in 1997.

So it would be natural for some visitors to approach the revamped
Getty Villa, scheduled to reopen Jan. 28 after a $275 million
expansion, with apprehension.

The complex, designed by Machado Silvetti Associates of Boston, is
genuinely an exquisite work of architecture. Reconfigured as an
elaborate architectural narrative, it approaches the historical past
with the scholarly attention normally reserved for real ancient
ruins. ...

http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/11/20/news/getvilla.php
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39693 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: ! ! ! THE WINNER OF THE 1st CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM ! ! !
A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
> Hmmm... I found 3,000 words too little, you found it
> too much... you won, I didn't... perhaps I should
> learn something here...

Salve, A. Apolloni Corde.

Success is, at least in my opinion, not a great measure of rightness.

My advise would be to subtract, say, 20-25% from the "max" and aim
towards that instead...then, should you "over-shoot", you might still
make it. And if it's a little shorter, it's no big deal. :)

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39694 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Re: Article on the Getty Villa in California
Salve, Lucius Fidelius Nexus

Thank you for sharing the article. Very interesting, I must say. Since I live here in southern California, I think I'll take a look at this place, maybe take some pictures and post them for all to take a gander at. Let's see what Nova Romans think of this "new" Roman villa. (No pun intended.)

Vale bene,

Maxima Valeria Messallina


lucius_fidelius <nexus909@...> wrote:
In new Getty Villa, a nod to Old World
By Nicolai Ouroussoff The New York Times

MALIBU, California Ducked into a narrow ravine above the Pacific
Coast Highway, the Getty Villa, a faux-Roman retreat brimming with
real Greco-Roman antiquities, has always drawn strong reactions.
Built in the 1970s by an eccentric mogul, it was derided by aesthetes
as a vulgar display of personal vanity. But the public was entranced
by its splendor and continued to flock there until the villa closed
for renovations in 1997.

So it would be natural for some visitors to approach the revamped
Getty Villa, scheduled to reopen Jan. 28 after a $275 million
expansion, with apprehension.

The complex, designed by Machado Silvetti Associates of Boston, is
genuinely an exquisite work of architecture. Reconfigured as an
elaborate architectural narrative, it approaches the historical past
with the scholarly attention normally reserved for real ancient
ruins. ...

http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/11/20/news/getvilla.php


---------------------------------
Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 39695 From: David Kling Date: 2005-11-21
Subject: Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus - Candidate for Consul
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

During the Consulship of Gnaeus Equitius Marinus and Gnaeus Salvius Astur a
Senatus Consultum was approved by the senate that set priorities for Nova
Roma in order of precedence. If elected Consul I would continue in the
tradition established by these former consuls, and set these priorities as
my own.

The priorities are listed below in [ ], with an explanation as to how I
plan on supporting these priorities.

*[The Religio Romana; it's promotion, preservation, protection, and
diffusion throughout the communities of Nova Roma. ]*

An extremely important institution of Nova Roma is the Religio Romana. As
Consul, and as a Pontifex, I will work to encourage the Collegium Pontificum
to reform itself. I believe that reform is necessary within the Collegium
Pontificum. Establish clear expectations of all priests in Nova Roma; from
Sacerdos to Pontifex Maximus. Make sure the obligations of the priesthood
are fulfilled, and ensure that offerings are made by our priests on behalf
of the Senate, and People of Nova Roma on a regular basis. The blessings of
the Gods of Rome are essential for the survival of our Republic. We, as a
Republic, need to make the Religio Romana a priority, while still being
mindful of the need for tolerance and understanding. For those who embrace
the Gods of Rome we need to offer assistance in "promoting, preserving, and
protecting" the divine cults. For those who do not embrace the Gods of Rome,
but who respect those who do, we need to offer tolerance and acceptance as
fellow citizens.

*[Establishment of a Nova Roma Endowment and its long term growth. ]*

Monetary resources are essential to the long term survival of any
organization. The future of Nova Roma rests on decisions that are made now,
and the foundation that is laid today may grow into what we all hope, and
envision. With a well established endowment fund, the future of Nova Roma
can be secured. Through a process of continued, and systematic commitment to
the financial well being of Nova Roma our future will be secured. If a fund
is not already created, I will urge the senate to approve of one and make
sure it is maintained. A fund like this also needs more tax paying citizens.
A positive, and active Nova Roma means more tax payers.

*[Sustaining support of existing projects, including the publication of the
Eagle, the Aedilian Fund for the Magna Mater Project, the Scholarship Fund,
and the Land Fund. ]*

Maintaining the traditions that have been started by others are important,
because they build up our history. The continuance of existing programs is
important because it shows that we are committed to the endeavors that we
start. If elected Consul I would support the projects of me predecessors
with enthusiasm. This includes, but is not limited to, the Magna Mater
project.

*[Outreach, recruitment and retention of citizens, including fostering
interest in the activities of the Sodalities. ]*

I believe the Sodalities are important to Nova Roma because people join
Nova Roma for different reasons, and a strong body of Sodalities will make
Nova Roma stronger. Nova Roma should be able to be all things Roman to all
people interested in things Roman.
Additionally, I support the GO Roman project of the Sodalitas Egressus, and
if elected as Consul will encourage education of provincial governors so
they can understand how the Go Roman project can help build-up their
province. I will also encourage a grass roots recruitment and retention
program, involving provincial governors and their administrations.

*[Promotion of Local Group activities. ]*

The provinces are important to Nova Roma, because they help to facilitate
contact between Nova Romans. I fully support active provinces, and local
group activities. I believe as much support as possible should be given by
the senate and magistrates to facilitate the establishment of more local
groups. I believe Nova Roma should EMPOWER people to join together, and not
require so much "red tape" it makes it impossible to organize into local
groups.

As a citizen, and if elected Consul, I will encourage people to attend
regional events, such as the Conventus in Europe, and I will work to create
such an event in the United States.

Local groups are very important to the life of any organization, and Nova
Roma should support the existing local groups, and encourage the foundation
of new ones.

*[Encouraging citizens to become involved in the work of government. ]*

Nova Roma needs a steady influx of new citizens. As our current citizens
rise through the cursus honorum there will need to be new citizens to take
their place. In order for Nova Roma to be a thriving organization we will
need our citizens to get involved. I believe in supporting citizens to
become active. If elected Consul I will support new citizens, as well as
established ones within my consular staff to help some new citizens get a
grasp of our process. If you want to be involved, you will only need to ask.


Valete:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

Candidate for Consul


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]