Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Dec 1-4, 2005

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40070 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Census, Resignations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40071 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Support for Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40072 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Kal. Dec.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40073 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: NR ELECTIONS: Missing Candidates?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40074 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: NR ELECTIONS: Missing Candidates?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40075 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: NR ELECTIONS: Missing Candidates?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40076 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: NR ELECTIONS: Missing Candidates?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40077 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Support for Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa and Quintus Suetonius Pauli
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40078 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: A Plea to the Quirites
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40079 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: NR ELECTIONS: Missing Candidates?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40080 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: A Plea to the Quirites
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40081 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: NR ELECTIONS: Missing Candidates?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40082 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: A Plea to the Quirites
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40083 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: A Plea to the Quirites
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40084 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40085 From: Daniel Dreesbach Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Candidiate for Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40086 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40087 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40088 From: os390account Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Retaining Citizens
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40089 From: Tribune Albucius Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - CALL for 2nd period CANDIDACIES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40090 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Retaining Citizens
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40091 From: Richard Sciarappa Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: A Plea to the Quirites
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40092 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: A Plea to the Quirites
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40093 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40094 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40095 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Response to Marcus Cassius Philippius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40096 From: os390account Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Retaining Citizens
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40097 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: New E-mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40098 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: THE CENSUS REPORT 2005, ADDENDA TO THE CENSUS 2005 REPORT and THE C
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40099 From: S Ullerius Venator Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Deixippus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40100 From: DecimusGladiusLupus Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Nova Nova Roman Flags
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40101 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Consul Fr. Apulus' absence [was: NR ELECTIONS: Missing Candidates?]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40102 From: STEPHEN GALLAGHER Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Nova Nova Roman Flags
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40103 From: Richard Sciarappa Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40104 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Deixippus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40105 From: ~The Kreick~ Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Nova Nova Roman Flags
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40106 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Deixippus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40107 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: A Plea to the Quirites
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40108 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Retaining Citizens
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40109 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: The Census: A Job Well Done
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40110 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: The Census: A Job Well Done
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40111 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: PRO SABINO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40112 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: post. Kal. Dec.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40113 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Candidates for Censor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40114 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: The Census: A Job Well Done
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40115 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Candidates for Censor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40116 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40117 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: PRO SABINO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40118 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Candidates for Censor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40119 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40120 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Candidates for Censor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40121 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Response to a question asked to me in private
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40122 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40123 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40124 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Founders of Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40125 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Upcomming Votes and Magistrate Resignations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40126 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40127 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: The Census: A Job Well Done
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40128 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Response to a question asked to me in private
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40129 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Many Thanks
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40130 From: marcushoratius Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40131 From: Marcus Iulius Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Candidate as Queastor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40132 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Response to a question asked to me in private
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40133 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40134 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40135 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40136 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Nova Nova Roman Flags
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40137 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40138 From: Marcus Arminius Maior Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Candidacy for Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40139 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: A Plea to the Quirites
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40140 From: Chuck Young Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40141 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40142 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40143 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: The Upcoming Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40144 From: Tribune Albucius Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Petitio tribunatus P. Memmi Albucii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40145 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Candidates for Censor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40146 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Declaration of Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40147 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40148 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40149 From: marcushoratius Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40150 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Tribune Albucius For Tribune (QSP)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40151 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Declaration of Candidacy for Marcus Cassius Phillipus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40152 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Tribune Albucius For Tribune (QSP)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40153 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Declaration of Candidacy for Marcus Cassius Phillipus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40154 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Tribune Albucius For Tribune (QSP)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40155 From: Chuck Young Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40156 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40157 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: P. Memmius Albucius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40158 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40159 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40160 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: P. Memmius Albucius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40161 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: P. Memmius Albucius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40162 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Question For M. Moravius Horatianus (Census)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40163 From: Chuck Young Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40164 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40165 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: The Upcoming Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40166 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40167 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40168 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40169 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: a.d. III Non. Dec.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40170 From: Tribune Albucius Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Eheu..... Hortensia (my candidacy)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40171 From: marcushoratius Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40172 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Candiidates for QUAESTOR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40173 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: The Fall of the Roman Empire New Book
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40174 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40175 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: The Fall of the Roman Empire New Book
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40176 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: #40174
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40177 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40178 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40179 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40180 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Tribune Albucius For Tribune (QSP)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40181 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40182 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40183 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40184 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candiidates for QUAESTOR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40185 From: jerichomyles2002 Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Behavior in NR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40186 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40187 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40188 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Census records and assumptions of privacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40189 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: The Fall of the Roman Empire New Book
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40190 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Damaging practices in social fora
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40191 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Census records and assumptions of privacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40192 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Census records and assumptions of privacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40193 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Behavior in NR (QFM)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40194 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: The Fall of the Roman Empire New Book
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40195 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40196 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candiidates for QUAESTOR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40197 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Off a Bit
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40198 From: marciusfelix Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candiidates for QUAESTOR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40199 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Eheu..... Hortensia (my candidacy)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40200 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Damaging practices in social fora
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40201 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Census records and assumptions of privacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40202 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candiidates for QUAESTOR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40203 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Damaging practices in social fora
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40204 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candiidates for QUAESTOR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40205 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Eheu..... Hortensia (my candidacy)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40206 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Gaius Geminius Germanus for Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40207 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Behavior in NR (QFM)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40208 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Petitio tribunatus P. Memmi Albucii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40209 From: jerichomyles2002 Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Behavior in NR (QFM)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40210 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Questions for Candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40211 From: marciusfelix Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candiidates for QUAESTOR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40212 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40213 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Gaius Geminius Germanus for Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40214 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Gaius Geminius Germanus for Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40215 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40216 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40217 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Behavior in NR (QFM)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40218 From: Titus Marcius Felix Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40219 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40220 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40221 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40222 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40223 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40224 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40225 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40226 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Behavior in NR (QFM)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40227 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Asking other Citizens to Serve
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40228 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40229 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Eheu..... Hortensia (my candidacy)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40230 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40231 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Asking other Citizens to Serve
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40232 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: prid. Non.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40233 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Asking other Citizens to Serve
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40234 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40235 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Upcomming Votes and Magistrate Resignations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40236 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40237 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Upcomming Votes and Magistrate Resignations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40238 From: marcushoratius Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Question For M. Moravius Horatianus (Census)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40239 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Upcomming Votes and Magistrate Resignations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40240 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40241 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Upcomming Votes and Magistrate Resignations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40242 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40243 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40244 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Upcomming Votes and Magistrate Resignations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40245 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Upcomming Votes and Magistrate Resignations



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40070 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Census, Resignations
Salvete omnes,

The results of the census and apparent shortage of electoral
candidates to this point today merits some thoughts and reflections.
I just dug this article up:

Top-Ten Reasons Why People Quit Their Jobs
by Gregory P. Smith

There are many reasons why good employees quit; most are
preventable. From my years of experience as a consultant, I've
identified a "Top Ten" list of reasons why people leave jobs:

1. Management demands that one person do the jobs of two or more
people, resulting in longer days and weekend work.

2. Management cuts back on administrative help, forcing professional
workers to use their time copying, stapling, collating, filing and
other clerical duties.

3. Management puts a freeze on raises and promotions, when an
employee can easily find a job earning 20-30 percent more somewhere
else.

4. Management doesn't allow the rank and file to make decisions or
allow them pride of ownership. A visitor to my website E-mailed me a
message that said, "Forget about the "professional" decisions-how
about when you can't even select the company's holiday card without
the President rejecting it for one of his own taste?"

5. Management constantly reorganizes, shuffles people around, and
changes direction constantly.

6. Management doesn't have or take the time to clarify goals and
decisions. Therefore, it rejects work after it was completed,
damaging the morale and esteem of those who prepared it.

7. Management shows favoritism and gives some workers better
offices, trips to conferences, etc.

8. Management relocates the offices to another location, forcing
employees to quit or double their commute.

9. Management promotes someone who lacks training and/or necessary
experience to supervisor, alienating staff and driving away good
employees.

10. Management creates a rigid structure and then allows departments
to compete against each other while at the same time preaching
teamwork and cooperation.

Interesting, isn't it, that all ten factors begin with the
phrase "ManagementÂ…."

Interesting, too, is just how many of these high-turnover factors
are preventable. My retention survey confirmed the truth of the
saying, "Employees don't quit their companies, they quit their
bosses." Thirty-five percent of the respondents answered yes to the
question, Was the attitude of your direct supervisor/manager the
primary factor in your quitting a previous job?


Well this has to do with commercial business overall but from what I
have observed and heard over the last few years, # 2,4, 9 and
especially 6 apply.

Also, to become Roman in belief, attitude, linguistics and
philosophy requires one to gradually build a knowledge base which
takes time, commitment and effort and after joining NR and getting
going many come to the realization that they cannot commit spend or
afford the time, effort and work required. Reality sets in.
Anyway we all make that mistake. When I was a kid I dreamed of being
a great scientist or astronaut exploring our solar system but the
reality of having to be an over achiever academically, developing
terrific leadership skills, sitting through years of head splitting
math and engineering courses, boring labs and nixed weekends instead
of flying these dream machines ultimately quashed my interest there
as well.

Anyway I think there is a motto with you military gentlemen that
only a lousy, poor officer blames his men.I would therefore ask if
there is anything we should be doing in being a lot more selective
in the people chosen for citizenship in NR, how we can motivate
people better to keep their interests up and perhaps initiate more
manditory face to face meetings and get-togethers. Even talking to
fellow citizens by phone really makes a difference in your attitudes
and impressions.

What I have said are just some ideas and thoughts not written in
stone. Hopefully we can start thinking about ways to re-group and
build up NR even if it takes more quality rather than quantity.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40071 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Support for Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Salvete omnes.

I would like to extend my support to Tiberius Galerius Paulinus in his
bid to become Praetor.

Galerius Paulinus has the determination and common sense to make him
an excellent choice for Praetor. Personally I see this role in NR as
requiring a heavy dose of common sense in equal measure to knowledge
of our laws. The latter can be learned by rote, while the former is an
inherent trait and the striking fact about common sense is that it
isn't all that common, so when a candidate comes forth that exhibits
common sense in such large measure we would be rash to pass him over.

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus certainly has my vote.

Valete
Gnaeus Iulius Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40072 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Kal. Dec.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est Kalendis Decembribus; haec dies fastus est.

"Night surprised them while they were lamenting over their situation
rather than consulting how to meet it. The different temperaments of
the men came out; some exclaimed: "Let us break through the
barricades, scale the mountain slopes, force our way through the
forest, try every way where we can carry arms. Only let us get at the
enemy whom we have beaten for now nearly thirty years; all places will
be smooth and easy to a Roman fighting against the perfidious
Samnite." Others answered: "Where are we to go? How are we to get
there? Are we preparing to move the mountains from their seat? How
will you get at the enemy as long as these peaks hang over us? Armed
and unarmed, brave and cowardly we are all alike trapped and
conquered. The enemy will not even offer us the chance of an
honourable death by the sword, he will finish the war without moving
from his seat." Indifferent to food, unable to sleep, they talked in
this way through the night. Even the Samnites were unable to make up
their minds what to do under such fortunate circumstances. It was
unanimously agreed to write to Herennius, the captain-general's
father, and ask his advice. He was now advanced in years and had given
up all public business, civil as well as military, but though his
physical powers were failing his intellect was as sound and clear as
ever. He had already heard that the Roman armies were hemmed in
between the two passes at the Caudine Forks, and when his son's
courier asked for his advice he gave it as his opinion that the whole
force ought to be at once allowed to depart uninjured. This advice was
rejected and the courier was sent back to consult him again. He now
advised that they should every one be put to death. On receiving these
replies, contradicting each other like the ambiguous utterances of an
oracle, his son's first impression was that his father's mental powers
had become impaired through his physical weakness. However, he yielded
to the unanimous wish and invited his father to the council of war.
The old man, we are told, at once complied and was conveyed in a wagon
to the camp. After taking his seat in the council, it became clear
from what he said that he had not changed his mind, but he explained
his reasons for the advice he gave. He believed that by taking the
course he first proposed, which he considered the best, he was
establishing a durable peace and friendship with a most powerful
people in treating them with such exceptional kindness; by adopting
the second he was postponing war for many generations, for it would
take that time for Rome to recover her strength painfully and slowly
after the loss of two armies. There was no third course. When his son
and the other chiefs went on to ask him what would happen if a middle
course were taken, and they were dismissed unhurt but under such
conditions as by the rights of war are imposed on the vanquished, he
replied: 'That is just the policy which neither procures friends nor
rids us of enemies. Once let men whom you have exasperated by
ignominious treatment live and you will find out your mistake. The
Romans are a nation who know not how to remain quiet under defeat.
Whatever disgrace this present extremity burns into their souls will
rankle there for ever, and will allow them no rest till they have made
you pay for it many times over.'" - Livy, History of Rome 9.3


"I begin to sing about Poseidon, the great god, mover of the earth and
fruitless sea, god of the deep who is also lord of Helicon and wide
Aegae. A two-fold office the gods allotted you, O Shaker of the Earth,
to be a tamer of horses and a saviour of ships!" - Homeric Hymn to
Poseidon II.1-5

"Neptuno has ago gratias meo patrono, qui salsis locis incolit
piscolentis, quom me ex suis locis pulchre ornatum expedivit, reducem
et tempulis, plurima praeda onustum salute horiae." (Thanks be to
Neptune my patron, who dwells in the fish-teeming salt sea, for
speeding me homeward from his sacred abode, well laden and in a good
hour) - Plautus, Rodens 906-910

Today is held in honor of the god Neptune, known to the Greeks as
Poseidon. Neptune is the second-born son of Cronus, ruler of the race
of gods known as The Titans, and his wife, the Titan-goddess of
fertility, Rhea. Fearing that he would be dethroned by one of his
offspring just as he had overthrown his own father Ouranos, Cronus
imprisoned each of his own offspring in Tartarus, the darkest section
of Hades, the Olympian underworld, as soon as he or she was born.
Appalled, the children's mother Rhea gave birth to Zeus without
Cronus's knowledge and gave him to the primeval Earth goddess Gaea to
be raised in secret. The adult Zeus freed his siblings and led them in
a successful revolt against Cronus and the Titans.

While it is believed that Neptune was among the offspring of Cronus
and Rhea imprisoned in Tartarus until later adulthood, Neptune, like
Zeus, had actually escaped this fate when his mother Rhea gave birth
to him in Mantineia, Arcadia (in the land known now as Greece). Rhea
hid Neptune who was then raised by other gods on the island of Rhodes
who taught him how to wield his mystical powers just as the Cyclopes
taught Zeus how to wield his own. Approached by the adult Zeus,
Neptune helped him free their other siblings and gather allies against
Cronus and the other Titans. The war against the Titans lasted for a
full decade ending with Zeus and his faction emerging victorious.

After Zeus became ruler of the pocket dimension of Olympus and of the
race of Olympian gods, he forged covenants with his elder brothers
Neptune and Pluto. Pluto, while still subject to Zeus's edicts, was
allowed to become the king of the Olympian underworld without any
interference from Zeus concerning the internal affairs of his kingdom.
Likewise, Neptune was allowed free reign over the vast oceans and the
various water-gods occupying the then ancient Grecian sphere of
influence. As a symbol of his station as the prime sea-god Neptune
carries an enchanted trident of various properties.

Neptune took as his wife the goddess Amphitrite, a daughter of the
elder water deities Nereus and Doris. He and Amphitrite had two
daughters Rhode and Benthiscya and a son Triton whose godly power
enabled him to assume the form of a merman. However, Neptune was
similar to his younger brother Zeus in that he had several affairs
with both mortal Earth women and Olympian goddesses and thus fathered
numerous offspring. Like Zeus, his children were sometimes born as
mortals or immortals. By his union with the Gorgon Medusa he fathered
the warrior Chrysaor and the magical flying horse, Pegasus. Akin to
Zeus who transformed himself into Amphitryon of Troezen to mate with
his wife Alcmena who became the mother of the demigod Hercules,
Neptune once disguised himself as the husband of the mortal woman
Aethra and fathered the Athenian hero Theseus. Other various offspring
of Neptune's include: Eumolpus, the Giant Sinis, the Cyclopes
Polyphemus, Orion, King Amycus, the shape-shifting god Proteus,
Agenor, Belus, Pelias, and Busiris who once became the King of Egypt.
Poseidon also had two twin giant sons, Otus and Ephialtes, who once
attempted to storm Olympus and overthrow Zeus and the Olympians before
meeting their deaths at each other's own hands in a hunting accident.

One of the most infamous affairs of Neptune involves his sister,
Demeter, Olympian goddess of the harvest. Neptune pursued Demeter who,
although first resisted his advances, eventually submitted to him. The
pair united, Demeter in the form of a mare and Neptune in the form of
a horse, and became the parents of Arion, the god of horses and
Despoena, the goddess of fruit.

Neptune was known to quarrel with his fellow Olympians to act as the
patron of particular Greek cities. For example, the sea-god was once
involved in a competition between himself and his niece, the goddess
of war Athena, for the city of Athens. To convince the people to name
the city after him and make him their patron god, Neptune used his
magical trident to produce a flowing spring. However, Athena won as a
result of giving the Athenians the far more useful olive tree (the
flowing spring was salt water). Neptune could also be a very moody
sea-god and at times used his powers to create earthquakes, floods and
storms to inflict fear and/or punishment on people as revenge. Though
difficult at times, Neptune could be cooperative as it was he who
aided the Greeks during the Trojan War before Zeus forbade the
Olympians from participating in it. After the Trojan War ended,
Neptune became angered against the hero Odysseus also known as
Ulysses, when he blinded the sea-god's son, the Cyclopes Polyphemus.
In his rage against this act Neptune saw to it that Odysseus's journey
back to Ithaca was full of trials and difficulties. Indeed it took
Odysseus 10 years to reach Ithaca after he and his men had departed
from Troy.


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy, Neptune (http://www.mythweb.com/gods/Poseidon.html) and
(http://www.marvunapp.com/Appendix/neptunep.htm) and
(http://homepage.mac.com/cparada/GML/)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40073 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: NR ELECTIONS: Missing Candidates?
G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Consuli F. Apulo Caesar
omnibusque SPD.

I'd like to thank our hard-working consul for setting
up the list of candidates on the main website. It is user-
friendly and very clearly laid out. As a new citizen, this
will be my first chance to vote in the annual elections, so I
have been carefully watching both the ML and the official list
of candidates. It is a privilege to vote, and I take that
privilege seriously.

However, the deadline is fast approaching, and I think perhaps
some of the candidates have missed a few administrative messages
pertaining to the election. Among them are some candidates who
would get my vote, but are not yet listed officially.

It was stated on the NR ANNOUNCE Board by Consul F. Apulus
Caesar for all candidates, and stated on the Main List as an
absolute requirement by Tr. Pl. P. Memmius Albucius regarding
the plebian offices, that candidates also register their
intentions at e-mail addresses OTHER THAN the main list.
(See messages quoted at end of this post.)

It's the same in real-world politics: you may tell the press,
and get your picture in the newspaper, but until you file your
nomination papers with the appropriate government office,
you are not actually a candidate. And if you miss the deadline,
you can't be a candidate.

So in making life a bit easier for Consul F. Apulus Caesar and
Tr. Pl. P. Memmius Albucius by e-mailing *them*, you ensure that
you are on the official list, and we all have a chance to vote
for you. :-) I intend no offense to anyone in making this
summary. I do hope this summary helps to ensure that everyone
who has dedicated their energy to running, has completed the
steps needed for a positive result.

Here's what I have combed from the Main List, and compared
with the LIST OF CANDIDATES (Nova Roma main website) as of
late evening 30 November 2005.


THE 7 CANDIDATES IN SQUARE BRACKETS [...] HAVE DECLARED ON
THIS MAILING LIST BUT ARE NOT YET ON THE OFFICIAL LIST
(At least, not that I could find.)

The numbers indicate the posting number of the mailing list
announcement by "missing" candidates. As you can tell, some
of the ML announcements date back a while. Some are also quite
recent, and your direct e-mails may not yet have been processed.
The official list at the NR Main Website asks all candidates
to verify their information (with a link to the Consul).

CENSOR (2):
Q. Fabius Maxiums
G. Minucius Hadrianus Felix

CONSUL (2):
P. Minucia Tiberia Strabo
G. G. Fabius Buteo Modianus

PRAETOR (2):
C. Curius Saturninus
T. Galerius Paulinus
T. Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus

AEDILIS CURULIS (2):
Gn. Equitius Cato
T. Iulius Sabinus

AEDILIS PLEBIS (2):
M. Hortensia Maior

TRIBUNIS PLEBIS (5):
G. Vipsanius Agrippa
[Gn. Silvius Astur, Post #39746]
[Q. Suetonius Paulinus, Post #39932]

QUAESTOR (8):
Q. Fabius Allectus
Q. Servilius Priscus
T. Marcius Felix
G. Iulius Caesar
C. Arminius Reccanellus
[T. Flavius Vespasianus Germanicus, Post # 39931]
[A. Apollonius Cordus, Post #39938]


MAGISTER ARANEARIUS (1):
D.Claudius Aquilius
Q. Valerius Callidus

EDITOR COMMENTARIUM (1):
no candidates

ROGATORES (4):
A. Tullia Scholastica
[G. Marius Aquilius, Post # 39993]
[M. Iulius Severus, Post # 40010]

DIRIBITORES (4):
[S. Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus, Post # 40004]

CUSTODES (2):
E. Curia Finnica


===========================================================

MESSAGES REGARDING WHERE TO SEND CANDIDACIES

POST # 745 ON NOVA ROMA ANNOUNCE list (NovaRoma-Announce)

"FAC" <fraelov@...>
Date: Sun Nov 20, 2005 10:09 am
Subject: CALL FOR CANDIDATES fraelov
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Fr. Apulus Caesar Consulis Quiritibus SPD

<snip>
All candidates must let me know of their intention to stand for
office directly by sending a message to fraelov@... (fraelov AT
yahoo DOT it) in order to be placed on the ballot. Please
include the word "Candidate" in the subject of the message,
and be sure to tell me your full Roman name and the office
you are pursuing. Please, send me privatly your candidacy,
I'll check everyday the Main list but for your security send
it at my address.

The candidacies will be accepted until December 3rd 2005
(8.00 PM, Time of Rome).
<snip>


[Monday Nov. 21 - I found a Spanish-only post on the Main List--
my emphases added. Note that "deben" is rather stronger than a
request or an invitation . . . see above.]

[POST #39771 --NOVA ROMA main list]
<snip>
Todos los candidatos **deben** informarme directamente de su
intenci�n de presentarse, enviفndome un mensaje a fraelov@...
para que su nombre aparezca en la cesta electoral,**incluyendo
la palabra “Candidate” en el asunto** del mensaje y
proporcionando su nombre romano completo y el cargo al que
aspiran. Por favor, envٍenme **de manera privada** el mensaje
de su candidatura; yo revisarÙ‰ diariamente la lista principal
de correo de Nova Roma, pero **para asegurase**, es conveniente
que me escriban a la direcci�n arriba seّalada.

Las candidaturas serفn aceptadas hasta el dٍa 3 de diciembre
de 2005 a las 8:00 PM, tiempo de Roma.

<snip>



[POST #39819, NOVA ROMA Main List]
From: "FAC" <fraelov@...>
Date: Thu Nov 24, 2005 7:33 am
Subject: About declarations of candidacies fraelov
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Salvete Omnes,

as written in the official call, I would strongly invite all the
candidates to the yearly elections to send the own candidacy to
me too at fraelov@... [fraelov AT yahoo.it].
Thank you very much

Valete
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Senior Consul


[POST # 39856 -- NOVA ROMA Main List]
"Tribune Albucius" <albucius_aoe@...>
Date: Fri Nov 25, 2005 12:35 pm
Subject: CALL FOR CANDIDACIES FOR PLEBEIAN OFFICES - ANNUAL
ELECTIONS publiusalbucius
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
P. Memmius Albucius omnibus Plebeiis s.d.

Salvete omnes,

Here comes the time of annual elections for plebeian offices.

Please read carefully the following edict, issued by the whole
Tribunate, which sets the rules of election for Tribunes and
Aediles.

The Honorable citizens who are interested will pay attention to
the posting address of their candidacy, at :
comitiaplebistributa@yahoogroups.com, and *just this one* !

The cives who would have declared their candidacy yet, for
example in NR main list, *must* post their declaration to
the above address.

Mind, too, the required conditions to run for these hard
working offices.

<snip>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40074 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: NR ELECTIONS: Missing Candidates?
C. Equitius Cato G. Aureliae Falconi Silvanae quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Thank you for the update, Aurelia Silvana; I too was beginning to
wonder about the "missing" candidates. One tiny correction: my
praenomen is "Gaius", not "Gnaeus"; no offense to any Gnaei out there,
but I like my own name better :-)

I guess it's easy to forget since everyone knows me as just "Cato".

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40075 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: NR ELECTIONS: Missing Candidates?
A. Apollonius C. Aureliae omnibusque sal.

Thanks for your vigilance and thoroughness! For my own
part, all I can say is that I did cc my announcement
to the proper address, received a private message fo
acknowledgement from the consul, and replied to that
in turn, so I clearly haven't slipped through that
particular crack - presumably there is just an
understandable delay before the website gets updated.
The same may be true of the other "missing" candidates.



___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Model Search 2005 - Find the next catwalk superstars - http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/model-search/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40076 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: NR ELECTIONS: Missing Candidates?
Salvete Gaia Aurelia et A. Apploni Corde,

I sent my data in as instructed and have been confirmed by the
tribunes. Over the last three days I did the same twice for Consul
FAC but have not heard back yet. He could be tied up or the website
has delays as you say but for the record, I followed instructions.

Regards,

QSP


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@y...> wrote:
>
> A. Apollonius C. Aureliae omnibusque sal.
>
> Thanks for your vigilance and thoroughness! For my own
> part, all I can say is that I did cc my announcement
> to the proper address, received a private message fo
> acknowledgement from the consul, and replied to that
> in turn, so I clearly haven't slipped through that
> particular crack - presumably there is just an
> understandable delay before the website gets updated.
> The same may be true of the other "missing" candidates.
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Model Search 2005 - Find the next catwalk superstars -
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/model-search/
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40077 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Support for Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa and Quintus Suetonius Pauli
Salve Gnae Iuli Caesar,

Thank you very much for your endorsement and confidence!


Quintus Suetonius Paulinus





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
<gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> Although unable to vote for either of these two men, being
patrician,
> I would still like to offer them my support and best wishes for
the
> campaign. Both are exceptionally dedicated to making Nova Roma
succeed
> and it is marvellous to see them both standing at the same time
for
> the same office.
>
> Agrippa has obviously worked very hard on the new NR coin project
and
> has also invested a lot of time, effort and money in that, as well
as
> in setting up his store of NR goods. Paulinus has constantly
sought to
> improve his province and NR in general and has done so despite a
> horrendously busy schedule of work and volunteer commitments.
>
> I wish them the very best of good fortune in the election.
>
> Valete
> Caesar
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40078 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: A Plea to the Quirites
C. Minucius Hadrianus Felix Quiritibus S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

I am writing this as a plea to the Quirites of Nova Roma for noble
citizens to step forward and run for elected office in the upcoming
election.

We still have many critical offices that have insufficient candidates or
none at all:

We still need one Plebian Aedile.

We still need four Tribune of the Plebs.

We still need three Quaestors.

We still need an Editor Commentariorum.

We still need four Diribitores.

We still need three Rogatores.

We still need one Custodes.

There are only two more days for candidates to submit their intentions
to run for office - the deadline is December 3rd, 8 p.m. Roma time, so
time is running out.

Citizens of Nova Roma, our Res Publica cannot function without an
elected government. We have 1521 registered citizens as of today and yet
we are still in danger of not even being able to field sufficient
candidates to fill the 18 remaining magisterial openings - and that is
to merely fill the spaces and leave us with uncontested elections in
many cases. Public service is the keystone of the Roman and Nova Roman
ideal. I realize many of you out there are saying to yourself "I'm too
new" or "I don't really know enough" and are afraid you may not be up to
the task. Trust me - and I'm speaking from experience - the best way to
learn is to jump right in. It may be a bit overwhelming at first, but
you'll be amazed at how quickly you adjust. Many of these open offices
are fairly simple and do not involve a huge investment in time, and they
are an excellent way for a new citizen to get involved, learn how Nova
Roma works, and start your path on that most Roman of endeavors - civic
service. We cannot have elections without Diribitores. The Plebs of Nova
Roma will lack a voice without Tribunes. We will have no newsletter
without an Editor Commentariorum. I implore you, citizens of Nova Roma,
step up to the plate for your Res Publica. Don't sit and wait for
someone else to do it, or it may never get done.

Valete Bene,

--
Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix
Pontifex et Minervae Aedis Sacerdos Legate Massachusetts Regio
c.minucius.hadrianus@...

"We are all, so far as we inherit the civilization of Europe,
still citizens of the Roman Empire, and time as not yet proved
Virgil wrong when he wrote /nec tempora pono: imperium sine fine dedi./"

-T.S. Eliot

"/His ego nec metas rerum nec tempora pono: imperium sine fine dedi./"

"For the achievement of these people I fix neither spatial boundaries or
temporal limits: I have given them empire without end."

-Virgil, /Aeneid/ I.278,279
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40079 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: NR ELECTIONS: Missing Candidates?
Salve G. Aurelia;

I have done as you have reminded.

Thank you.

I hope to once again render good service to the Republic as a Diribitor.

=========================================
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor
Quaestor emeritus, Diribitor Emeritus
Provincial Legate Emeritus

Religio Septentrionalis - Poet
US Military - Veteran

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/

--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40080 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: A Plea to the Quirites
Salvete Gai Minuci Hadriani et omnes,

You probably haven't had a chance to read the last several posts yet
but the election roll has not been updated over the last few days.
For example we have 3 tribunes and 7 Quaestors.

I'd also add my appeal for more citizens to come forward and run in
these elections since it will be far more difficult to get things
done and NR turned around as all of us wish to do.

Regards,

QSP




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix
<c.minucius.hadrianus@n...> wrote:
>
> C. Minucius Hadrianus Felix Quiritibus S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> I am writing this as a plea to the Quirites of Nova Roma for noble
> citizens to step forward and run for elected office in the
upcoming
> election.
>
> We still have many critical offices that have insufficient
candidates or
> none at all:
>
> We still need one Plebian Aedile.
>
> We still need four Tribune of the Plebs.
>
> We still need three Quaestors.
>
> We still need an Editor Commentariorum.
>
> We still need four Diribitores.
>
> We still need three Rogatores.
>
> We still need one Custodes.
>
> There are only two more days for candidates to submit their
intentions
> to run for office - the deadline is December 3rd, 8 p.m. Roma
time, so
> time is running out.
>
> Citizens of Nova Roma, our Res Publica cannot function without an
> elected government. We have 1521 registered citizens as of today
and yet
> we are still in danger of not even being able to field sufficient
> candidates to fill the 18 remaining magisterial openings - and
that is
> to merely fill the spaces and leave us with uncontested elections
in
> many cases. Public service is the keystone of the Roman and Nova
Roman
> ideal. I realize many of you out there are saying to yourself "I'm
too
> new" or "I don't really know enough" and are afraid you may not be
up to
> the task. Trust me - and I'm speaking from experience - the best
way to
> learn is to jump right in. It may be a bit overwhelming at first,
but
> you'll be amazed at how quickly you adjust. Many of these open
offices
> are fairly simple and do not involve a huge investment in time,
and they
> are an excellent way for a new citizen to get involved, learn how
Nova
> Roma works, and start your path on that most Roman of endeavors -
civic
> service. We cannot have elections without Diribitores. The Plebs
of Nova
> Roma will lack a voice without Tribunes. We will have no
newsletter
> without an Editor Commentariorum. I implore you, citizens of Nova
Roma,
> step up to the plate for your Res Publica. Don't sit and wait for
> someone else to do it, or it may never get done.
>
> Valete Bene,
>
> --
> Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix
> Pontifex et Minervae Aedis Sacerdos Legate Massachusetts Regio
> c.minucius.hadrianus@n...
>
> "We are all, so far as we inherit the civilization of Europe,
> still citizens of the Roman Empire, and time as not yet proved
> Virgil wrong when he wrote /nec tempora pono: imperium sine fine
dedi./"
>
> -T.S. Eliot
>
> "/His ego nec metas rerum nec tempora pono: imperium sine fine
dedi./"
>
> "For the achievement of these people I fix neither spatial
boundaries or
> temporal limits: I have given them empire without end."
>
> -Virgil, /Aeneid/ I.278,279
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40081 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: NR ELECTIONS: Missing Candidates?
Salvete, omnes -

On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 02:14:51PM +0000, A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
> A. Apollonius C. Aureliae omnibusque sal.
>
> Thanks for your vigilance and thoroughness! For my own
> part, all I can say is that I did cc my announcement
> to the proper address, received a private message fo
> acknowledgement from the consul, and replied to that
> in turn, so I clearly haven't slipped through that
> particular crack - presumably there is just an
> understandable delay before the website gets updated.
> The same may be true of the other "missing" candidates.

As the webmaster, and theoretically the person whose responsibility it
is to add the candidates' posts to the list, I must extend my apologies
to everyone. For whatever reason, my Yahoo mail delivery during the past
several weeks has varied from prompt to abysmally late in delivery, and
I strongly suspect that I have missed a number of postings as well.

I apprised Censor Quintillianus of this, and my resulting inability to
watch the list constantly at the beginning of this period, and the
result was that F. Apuleius Caesar volunteered to help with the task;
however, it seems that we have fallen behind even so.

I can only guarantee this: anyone *emailing their candidacy to me
directly* at ben@... will see it posted within a maximum of
24 hours, and nearly instantly if I'm at my computer when I receive it.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tamdiu discendum est, quamdiu vivas.
We should learn as long as we may live. (We live and learn.)
-- Seneca Philosophus, "Epistulae"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40082 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: A Plea to the Quirites
Salve amice!

*lol* You are quite correct - I was going by the list of registered
candidates on the website. My mistake! I'm happy to see that more
citizens have pledged their time to Nova Roma, though it is still vital
that we fill the remaining vacancies - especially the Diribitores and
Rogatores. Those positions might not be very glamorous, but they are
absolutely vital to the functioning of our Res Publica.

Vale bene,

Hadrianus



Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) wrote:

> Salvete Gai Minuci Hadriani et omnes,
>
> You probably haven't had a chance to read the last several posts yet
> but the election roll has not been updated over the last few days.
> For example we have 3 tribunes and 7 Quaestors.
>
> I'd also add my appeal for more citizens to come forward and run in
> these elections since it will be far more difficult to get things
> done and NR turned around as all of us wish to do.
>
> Regards,
>
> QSP
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix
> <c.minucius.hadrianus@n...> wrote:
> >
> > C. Minucius Hadrianus Felix Quiritibus S.P.D.
> >
> > Salvete omnes.
> >
> > I am writing this as a plea to the Quirites of Nova Roma for noble
> > citizens to step forward and run for elected office in the
> upcoming
> > election.
> >
> > We still have many critical offices that have insufficient
> candidates or
> > none at all:
> >
> > We still need one Plebian Aedile.
> >
> > We still need four Tribune of the Plebs.
> >
> > We still need three Quaestors.
> >
> > We still need an Editor Commentariorum.
> >
> > We still need four Diribitores.
> >
> > We still need three Rogatores.
> >
> > We still need one Custodes.
> >
> > There are only two more days for candidates to submit their
> intentions
> > to run for office - the deadline is December 3rd, 8 p.m. Roma
> time, so
> > time is running out.
> >
> > Citizens of Nova Roma, our Res Publica cannot function without an
> > elected government. We have 1521 registered citizens as of today
> and yet
> > we are still in danger of not even being able to field sufficient
> > candidates to fill the 18 remaining magisterial openings - and
> that is
> > to merely fill the spaces and leave us with uncontested elections
> in
> > many cases. Public service is the keystone of the Roman and Nova
> Roman
> > ideal. I realize many of you out there are saying to yourself "I'm
> too
> > new" or "I don't really know enough" and are afraid you may not be
> up to
> > the task. Trust me - and I'm speaking from experience - the best
> way to
> > learn is to jump right in. It may be a bit overwhelming at first,
> but
> > you'll be amazed at how quickly you adjust. Many of these open
> offices
> > are fairly simple and do not involve a huge investment in time,
> and they
> > are an excellent way for a new citizen to get involved, learn how
> Nova
> > Roma works, and start your path on that most Roman of endeavors -
> civic
> > service. We cannot have elections without Diribitores. The Plebs
> of Nova
> > Roma will lack a voice without Tribunes. We will have no
> newsletter
> > without an Editor Commentariorum. I implore you, citizens of Nova
> Roma,
> > step up to the plate for your Res Publica. Don't sit and wait for
> > someone else to do it, or it may never get done.
> >
> > Valete Bene,
> >
> > --
> > Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix
> > Pontifex et Minervae Aedis Sacerdos Legate Massachusetts Regio
> > c.minucius.hadrianus@n...
> >
> > "We are all, so far as we inherit the civilization of Europe,
> > still citizens of the Roman Empire, and time as not yet proved
> > Virgil wrong when he wrote /nec tempora pono: imperium sine fine
> dedi./"
> >
> > -T.S. Eliot
> >
> > "/His ego nec metas rerum nec tempora pono: imperium sine fine
> dedi./"
> >
> > "For the achievement of these people I fix neither spatial
> boundaries or
> > temporal limits: I have given them empire without end."
> >
> > -Virgil, /Aeneid/ I.278,279
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


--
Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix
Pontifex et Minervae Aedis Sacerdos Legate Massachusetts Regio
c.minucius.hadrianus@...

"We are all, so far as we inherit the civilization of Europe,
still citizens of the Roman Empire, and time as not yet proved
Virgil wrong when he wrote /nec tempora pono: imperium sine fine dedi./"

-T.S. Eliot

"/His ego nec metas rerum nec tempora pono: imperium sine fine dedi./"

"For the achievement of these people I fix neither spatial boundaries or
temporal limits: I have given them empire without end."

-Virgil, /Aeneid/ I.278,279
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40083 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: A Plea to the Quirites
A. Apollonius C. Minucio omnibusque sal.

I quite agree with your general appeal. In one
respect, though, we're better off that you fear:

> We still need three Rogatores.

Since there are only two vacancies for rogator in
total, I suspect we really only need one more candidate.



___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40084 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Salvete quirites, et salve Quinte Suetoni,

"Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> writes:

[about why people quit their jobs]

> Interesting, too, is just how many of these high-turnover factors
> are preventable. My retention survey confirmed the truth of the
> saying, "Employees don't quit their companies, they quit their
> bosses."

In a Nova-Roman context, I'm guessing you think that people depart Nova Roma
because of the Nova Roman government. Is that correct? If so, I'll agree
with you in part. I've communicated directly with a fair number of departing
citizens, and I can confirm that in many cases it comes down to disaffection
with one or a few magistrates or senators.

[...]

> Also, to become Roman in belief, attitude, linguistics and
> philosophy requires one to gradually build a knowledge base which
> takes time, commitment and effort and after joining NR and getting
> going many come to the realization that they cannot commit spend or
> afford the time, effort and work required. Reality sets in.

Yes, this is a daunting task. Surprisingly though, I've never had anybody
list it as a reason for resigning.

> Anyway I think there is a motto with you military gentlemen that
> only a lousy, poor officer blames his men.I would therefore ask if
> there is anything we should be doing in being a lot more selective
> in the people chosen for citizenship in NR,

If I were creating Nova Roma anew, I'd give serious consideration to making
the citizenship something that was given only after a year-long novitiate.
But I'm not creating Nova Roma anew. I have to work within the pre-existing
framework. Within that framework I've been able to implement a process that
has required new citizens to complete a 90 day probationary period and pass a
fairly simple test. This has been in effect for almost a year now, and I
think it is bearing fruit. Our newer citizens are more involved and more
educated about matters.

Within the framework set out by the founders and those who came before us, I
think we currently have a pretty good process. The census measured Nova Roma
in a time of flux, when a lot of the earliest citizens had decided that they
were no longer interested in participating. In some cases this was because
of people in authority, in other cases because the organization has moved in
directions that the citizen didn't like. By far the most common case is of
somebody who just cut off contact and had to be dropped. We have no way of
knowing why these 'ghosts' left us, or if there's any way that we could have
kept them.

I do know from direct observation as censor that many, many applicants this
year have NOT completed their probationary period successfully. Our
relatively simple test has served to turn away hundreds who decided that we
required more intellectual rigor than they were willing to expend. The good
thing is that some future censors will not have to strike these names from
the rolls.

You're correct that face-to-face meetings contribute much to the quality of a
Nova Roman community. I hope we can have more of them as time goes by.

Vale, et valete quirites,

-- Marinus

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40085 From: Daniel Dreesbach Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Candidiate for Praetor
I Gauis Geminius Germanus am running for Praetor. I have been serving as Queastor for the past year.


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40086 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Salve Censor Marine,

Your response to my post is greatly appreciated as you have a first
hand pratical knowledge rather than speculative of what goes on
internally with the population in NR.

Thank you for your comments!

Regards,

QSP


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "CN•EQVIT•MARINVS \(Gnaeus
Equitius Marinus\)" <gawne@c...> wrote:
>
> Salvete quirites, et salve Quinte Suetoni,
>
> "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@d...> writes:
>
> [about why people quit their jobs]
>
> > Interesting, too, is just how many of these high-turnover factors
> > are preventable. My retention survey confirmed the truth of the
> > saying, "Employees don't quit their companies, they quit their
> > bosses."
>
> In a Nova-Roman context, I'm guessing you think that people depart
Nova Roma
> because of the Nova Roman government. Is that correct? If so,
I'll agree
> with you in part. I've communicated directly with a fair number
of departing
> citizens, and I can confirm that in many cases it comes down to
disaffection
> with one or a few magistrates or senators.
>
> [...]
>
> > Also, to become Roman in belief, attitude, linguistics and
> > philosophy requires one to gradually build a knowledge base which
> > takes time, commitment and effort and after joining NR and
getting
> > going many come to the realization that they cannot commit spend
or
> > afford the time, effort and work required. Reality sets in.
>
> Yes, this is a daunting task. Surprisingly though, I've never had
anybody
> list it as a reason for resigning.
>
> > Anyway I think there is a motto with you military gentlemen that
> > only a lousy, poor officer blames his men.I would therefore ask
if
> > there is anything we should be doing in being a lot more
selective
> > in the people chosen for citizenship in NR,
>
> If I were creating Nova Roma anew, I'd give serious consideration
to making
> the citizenship something that was given only after a year-long
novitiate.
> But I'm not creating Nova Roma anew. I have to work within the
pre-existing
> framework. Within that framework I've been able to implement a
process that
> has required new citizens to complete a 90 day probationary period
and pass a
> fairly simple test. This has been in effect for almost a year
now, and I
> think it is bearing fruit. Our newer citizens are more involved
and more
> educated about matters.
>
> Within the framework set out by the founders and those who came
before us, I
> think we currently have a pretty good process. The census
measured Nova Roma
> in a time of flux, when a lot of the earliest citizens had decided
that they
> were no longer interested in participating. In some cases this
was because
> of people in authority, in other cases because the organization
has moved in
> directions that the citizen didn't like. By far the most common
case is of
> somebody who just cut off contact and had to be dropped. We have
no way of
> knowing why these 'ghosts' left us, or if there's any way that we
could have
> kept them.
>
> I do know from direct observation as censor that many, many
applicants this
> year have NOT completed their probationary period successfully.
Our
> relatively simple test has served to turn away hundreds who
decided that we
> required more intellectual rigor than they were willing to
expend. The good
> thing is that some future censors will not have to strike these
names from
> the rolls.
>
> You're correct that face-to-face meetings contribute much to the
quality of a
> Nova Roman community. I hope we can have more of them as time
goes by.
>
> Vale, et valete quirites,
>
> -- Marinus
>
> CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40087 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
SALVETE QUIRITES ET SALVE EQUITE MARINE !

You and Quintus Suetonius wrote :

QSP :<<< Also, to become Roman in belief, attitude, linguistics and
philosophy requires one to gradually build a knowledge base which
takes time, commitment and effort and after joining NR and getting
going many come to the realization that they cannot commit spend or
afford the time, effort and work required. Reality sets in.>>>

GEM :<<< Yes, this is a daunting task. Surprisingly though, I've
never had anybody list it as a reason for resigning.>>>

Yes anybody list, but this is the true. Peoples don't recognize and
they didn't understand that Nova Roma is in fact an educational and
esspecially a self-education organization. The results are coming
only with efforts.

QSP : <<< Anyway I think there is a motto with you military
gentlemen that only a lousy, poor officer blames his men.I would
therefore ask if there is anything we should be doing in being a lot
more selective in the people chosen for citizenship in NR>>>

GEM : <<< If I were creating Nova Roma anew, I'd give serious
consideration to making the citizenship something that was given
only after a year-long novitiate. But I'm not creating Nova Roma
anew. I have to work within the pre-existing framework. Within
that framework I've been able to implement a process that has
required new citizens to complete a 90 day probationary period and
pass a fairly simple test. This has been in effect for almost a
year now, and I think it is bearing fruit. Our newer citizens are
more involved and more educated about matters.

I'm not against the probationay period or against the test. But is
not enaugh. Because ( I love statistics ) in every week four - five
citizens joining to the Forum. Or they don't understand what is
happen here, or they are dissapointed about what is happen, so that,
after a time they left the group. I'm not talking about those who
request the citizenship.

GEM : <<< You're correct that face-to-face meetings contribute much
to the quality of a Nova Roman community. I hope we can have more
of them as time goes by.

I hope, too. I saw yours photos from this year meetings in US. Very
nice.

VALE, ET VALETE,
IVL SABINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40088 From: os390account Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Retaining Citizens
Salvete Quirites!

New citizens are a wonderful thing, no matter what sparked their
interest initially. Look at the HBO "Rome" series. I'm sure its
success has produced some kind of upsurge in many thing Roman,
despite historic accuracy or inaccuracy. The movie "Gladiator" did
something similar.

With a return to "The Sopranos," people will be exposed to reruns of
the series, and thus this particular source demographic might lessen
until the second season airs, circa early 2007.

So, what do we do with a bunch of inquisitive people, who wish to
learn about Rome, and subsequently Nova Roma? It's akin to someone
obtaining a driver's license, what with a large number of potential
pamphlets and all, to read and memorize in expectation of taking a
test to ensure that he or she will be a safe and conscientious
operator.

Driving is a privilege, not a right. Given that many potential
citizens might venture here initially to learn a little more about
what they've seen on TV or in the movies, and expect things to
be "like that show on HBO or PBS," how can we walk with them through
the process, without dumping them into a plethora of mailing lists,
usually fraught with internal politics?

I propose the formation of a committee to oversee the New Citizen
Process, to investigate and review the current process, and find
ways not only to make the experience more enjoyable for the new
citizen, but also a way to reach out to more potential citizens.

Inspired by Praefect Equestria Iunia Laeca's efforts with a "Place
To Go" for members of my own province of Nova Britannia, I would
propose the formation of a group of volunteers, whose function would
be to "Welcome" new citizens, and play a dual role as both "Mentor"
and "Paedagogus" to assist these new citizens during their
probationary period. These people would work one-on-one with the new
citizens; a few Novi assigned to each volunteer. They would
personally help them navigate, mentor them, teach them, and
demonstrate to them that they ARE an already active and important
part of Nova Roma.

Additionally, each new citizen thus helped would then be able to
function as a helper, thereby allowing the new citizen to become
involved immediately. After all, "Discimus ut discimur." (pardon my
spelling and grammar errors) I learn the most when I teach, since
my students as me questions that challenge myself. I should think
the same would be true for new citizens.

As members now responsible for the education of others, I believe
that new citizens themselves would contribute the most to citizen
retention.

As my toga begins to slide off my shoulder, I'll end this thought,
but I welcome any and all questions and discussions regarding the
potential of this holistic approach.

Valete!
Q. Valerius Callidus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40089 From: Tribune Albucius Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - CALL for 2nd period CANDIDACIES
Publius Memmius Albucius omnibus Plebeiis ac Quiritibus s.d.


Salvete omnes,

In my Main list message n°39856, Fri Nov 25, 2005 9:35 pm, on «CALL
FOR CANDIDACIES FOR PLEBEIAN OFFICES - ANNUAL ELECTIONS » (CPT list
889 Fri Nov 25, 2005 9:37 pm) , I had the honor to inform you, on
behalf of the whole Tribunate, on the rules applicable to plebeian
elections this year, for 2759 a.u.c. offices (please see the message
and the edict below).

This communication, and the attached edict, have not been legally
contested and so have received a full legal binding.

The Tribunate edict has precised two periods for the presentation of
the candidacies :
- from 25th Nov. 2005 9 :35 pm to 1st Dec. 2005 0:00 am Rome time ;
- from 1st Dec. 2005 0 :00 am to 9th Dec. 2005 0:00 am Rome time.

During the 1st period, have been accepted the sole candidacies of the
citizens who have not occupied, during this year 2758, the office for
which the candidacy has just been presented.

An optional period, the second one, has been scheduled, just in the
following possible case : on 1st Dec. 2005 00 :00 am (Kal. Dec. 2758
auc) there would have been at least, for each plebeain magistracy
(aedilician or tribunician one), more open positions than legally
received candidacies.

I am obliged to state, dear amici Plebeii and you, omnes Quirites,
that we know today this situation. For, concerning :

- Aedilitas plebis :
. Open positions : 2
. Registered candidacies in CPT list : 0

- Tribunatus plebis :
. Open positions : 5
. Registered candidacies in CPT list : 3
(Agrippa, Astur, Paulinus).


I thus declare opened the second period for candidacies.

In this period, which ends on *9th Dec. 2005 0:00 am Rome time*,
would thus be accepted the candidacies :
- *dully made in CPT list*
- by citizens who answer *the legal requirements* (see the edict
below)to run for these offices.

These candidacies could thus be made by :

- cives who would have forgotten to register in CPT list
during the 1st period ;
- cives who would not have in one of these positions in 2758
and would not have wished to submit their candidacy during the first
period ;
- the aediles and tribuni plebis currently in charge, on the
same type of office that they have today, in due consideration of the
prohibition of cumulatio (no running on 2 magistracies for one group
of annual elections).


Good luck to all, and prepare, all of you Plebeians, to vote !

Valete omnes.

On behalf of Marcus Bianchius Antonius, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus,
Caius Curius Saturninus, Marca Hortensia Maior, and myself, Tribuni
plebis,


P. Memmius Albucius
Tribunus Plebis


______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

Message n°39856, Fri Nov 25, 2005 9:35 pm, on «CALL FOR CANDIDACIES
FOR PLEBEIAN OFFICES - ANNUAL ELECTIONS »

Here comes the time of annual elections for plebeian offices.

Please read carefully the following edict, issued by the whole
Tribunate, which sets the rules of election for Tribunes and Aediles.

The Honorable citizens who are interested will pay attention to the
posting address of their candidacy, at :
comitiaplebistributa@yahoogroups.com,

and *just this one* !

The cives who would have declared their candidacy yet, for example in
NR main list, *must* post their declaration to the above address.

Mind, too, the required conditions to run for these hard working
offices.

On behalf of the whole Tribunate, let me please ask respectfully to
Pales, Ceres and Minerva, among our Gods, to place these elections
under their protection. Let me please, also, thank in advance all of
the candidates, who are ready to give (a lot of) their time and
energy to represent the Plebs of Nova Roma and "administer the law"
in next 2759 a.u.c..

Good luck to all, and prepare, all of you Plebeians, to vote !

Valete omnes.

On behalf of Marcus Bianchius Antonius, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus,
Caius Curius Saturninus, Marca Hortensia Maior, and myself, Tribuni
plebis,


P. Memmius Albucius
Tribunus Plebis



attached_________________________________________________________

EDICT OF THE TRIBUNATE FOR THE CALL OF CANDIDACIES FOR THE ANNUAL
PLEBEIAN ELECTIONS


We, the tribunes of the Plebs Bianchius, Constantinus, Curius,
Hortensia, and Memmius, currently in charge for Nova Roma, and
specially of the annual plebeian elections, hereby call for
candidates for the plebeian magistracies for year 2759 a.u.c. (2006
c.e.).

This call is strictly reserved for plebeian citizens.


The plebeian citizen wishing to serve as Tribune or Aedile of the
Plebs in 2759 a.u.c. must be :


- citizen for at least six months by Kal. Ian. MMDCCLVIIII (January
1st, 2006) ;
- assiduus (tax-paying) at the time of the present call ;
- plebeian, i.e. member of the plebeian order ;
- not candidate to another magisterial office (cumulatio).


The comitia plebis tributa will be convened for these annual
elections later, but candidates may, from now, make their candidacy
known and enter in campaign if they wish.

Every plebeian candidate must, before 00:00 a.m. (time of Rome) on
1th December, 2005, confirm her/his candidacy by posting it to the
mailing list of the *comitia plebis tributa* at :

comitiaplebistributa@yahoogroups.com

Any other posting, for example to the main list of Nova Roma, is
facultative. A candidacy which would have not been posted in
comitiaplebistributa@yahoogroups.com list will not registered by the
Tribunate.

Every candidacy will :

1/ make appear in the subject of the message, the expression "
Candidacy for tribune [or " aedile "]" ;

2/ include, in its contents, the clear will to run for tribune or
aedile ;

3/ include the full roman name, dully registered by the Censors of
Nova Roma, of the candidate.

The following offices are open to the candidacies :

TRIBUNUS PLEBIS - 5 positions available.

In addition to the conditions aforementioned, the candidate for
Tribune must also be at least 25 years old at Kal. Ian. 2759 (born
on, or before 1st January 1981).

AEDILIS PLEBIS - 2 positions available.

In addition to the conditions aforementioned, the candidate for
Aedile must also :

- be at least 21 years old at Kal. Ian. 2759 (born on or before 1st
January 1985).
- have occupied one of the offices of the Tribuneship, Quaestorship,
Curatorship or Propraetorship for six months long, except - according
lex Arminia de curso honorum
(http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2004-06-02-ii.html) -
current scribes of aediles plebis, who may run for aedileship if they
have been in this charge for at least six months.

According lex Salicia de prorogatione et cumulatione, current
tribunes and aediles are not allowed to be candidates.

However, if, after 00:00 a.m. (time of Rome) on 1th December, 2005,
the number of the candidates for the offices of tribune or aedile is
lower than the number of offices to be filled (5 for the tribunes and
2 for the aediles), a second period of presentation of candidacies
will be open for the concerned magistracy.

During this second period, which will last from 00:00 a.m. (time of
Rome) on 1th December, 2005 to 00:00 a.m. (time of Rome) on 9th
December, 2005, current tribunes and aediles will be allowed to be
candidates, with the same rights and duties than other candidates.


Issued in Roma, Italia, this twenty fifthday (25th) of November, 2005
C.E. (a.d. VII Kal. Nov. 2758 a.u.c.), during the consulate of Fr.
Apulus Caesar and Ga. Popillius Laenas


Marcus Bianchius Antonius, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus, Caius Curius
Saturninus, Marca Hortensia Maior, Publius Memmius Albucius, Tribuni
plebis.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40090 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Retaining Citizens
Salvete quirites, et salve Calide,

Q. Valerius Callidus <Velaki@...> writes:

[...]
> I propose the formation of a committee to oversee the New Citizen
> Process, to investigate and review the current process, and find
> ways not only to make the experience more enjoyable for the new
> citizen, but also a way to reach out to more potential citizens.

This idea has merit, but it also has problems. If this proposed committee
were to be an official arm of Nova Roman government it would have to be
created by the Senate, the Comitia Centuriata, the Comitia Populi Tributa, or
the Concilium Plebis. To do that, a presiding magistrate would have to
propose it as an agenda item for the respective body, and then there'd have
to be a vote on it.

I say this not to shoot you down, but to make clear the difficulties. A
better course of action might be one of providing guidance to the provincial
governments so that they could have local programs where existing citizens
would voluntarily provide "welcome wagon" services to new citizens. The
provincial governors have wide latitude in their potestas, and can do many
things within their provinces that the central government can only do with a
political process as described above.

The Sodalitas Egressus has been working on recruitment matters. Perhaps this
would be an area that Gn. Iulius Caesar and M. Audens could turn their
considerable expertise toward. If Egressus were to develop a framework for
provincial groups to use for their retention work, it might prove to be a
very good thing indeed.

Vale, et valete quirites,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40091 From: Richard Sciarappa Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: A Plea to the Quirites
Salvete omnes,

My name is Lucius Cassius Cornutus.
I have only been a citizen since 7/27/05.....
My focus is Roman paganism, and I know
little of politics. As I understand it one has
to be a citizen for more than six months
to run. What can I do to help Nova Roma
at this stage in my citizenship?

PAX DEORUM

Lucius Cassius Cornutus







On Dec 1, 2005, at 10:02 AM, Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix wrote:

> C. Minucius Hadrianus Felix Quiritibus S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> I am writing this as a plea to the Quirites of Nova Roma for noble
> citizens to step forward and run for elected office in the upcoming
> election.
>
> We still have many critical offices that have insufficient candidates
> or
> none at all:
>
> We still need one Plebian Aedile.
>
> We still need four Tribune of the Plebs.
>
> We still need three Quaestors.
>
> We still need an  Editor Commentariorum.
>
> We still need four Diribitores.
>
> We still need three Rogatores.
>
> We still need one Custodes.
>
> There are only two more days for candidates to submit their intentions
> to run for office - the deadline is December 3rd, 8 p.m. Roma time, so
> time is running out.
>
> Citizens of Nova Roma, our Res Publica cannot function without an
> elected government. We have 1521 registered citizens as of today and
> yet
> we are still in danger of not even being able to field sufficient
> candidates to fill the 18 remaining magisterial openings - and that is
> to merely fill the spaces and leave us with uncontested elections in
> many cases. Public service is the keystone of the Roman and Nova Roman
> ideal. I realize many of you out there are saying to yourself "I'm too
> new" or "I don't really know enough" and are afraid you may not be up
> to
> the task. Trust me - and I'm speaking from experience - the best way
> to
> learn is to jump right in. It may be a bit overwhelming at first, but
> you'll be amazed at how quickly you adjust. Many of these open offices
> are fairly simple and do not involve a huge investment in time, and
> they
> are an excellent way for a new citizen to get involved, learn how Nova
> Roma works, and start your path on that most Roman of endeavors -
> civic
> service. We cannot have elections without Diribitores. The Plebs of
> Nova
> Roma will lack a voice without Tribunes. We will have no newsletter
> without an Editor Commentariorum. I implore you, citizens of Nova
> Roma,
> step up to the plate for your Res Publica. Don't sit and wait for
> someone else to do it, or it may never get done.
>
> Valete Bene,
>
> --
> Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix
> Pontifex et Minervae Aedis Sacerdos Legate Massachusetts Regio
> c.minucius.hadrianus@...
>
> "We are all, so far as we inherit the civilization of Europe,
> still citizens of the Roman Empire, and time as not yet proved
> Virgil wrong when he wrote /nec tempora pono: imperium sine fine
> dedi./"
>
> -T.S. Eliot
>
> "/His ego nec metas rerum nec tempora pono: imperium sine fine dedi./"
>
> "For the achievement of these people I fix neither spatial boundaries
> or
> temporal limits: I have given them empire without end."
>
> -Virgil, /Aeneid/ I.278,279
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Ancient history
> Fall of the roman empire
> The fall of the roman empire
> Roman empire
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> ▪  Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>  
> ▪  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>  
> ▪  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40092 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: A Plea to the Quirites
Salve Luci Cassi,

Lucius Cassius Cornutus <obiwan6797@...> writes:

> My name is Lucius Cassius Cornutus.
> I have only been a citizen since 7/27/05.....
> My focus is Roman paganism, and I know
> little of politics. As I understand it one has
> to be a citizen for more than six months
> to run. What can I do to help Nova Roma
> at this stage in my citizenship?

Keep studying and learning. Seriously. Pursue your interest in the Religio.
Read Scheid's book if you haven't already read it. Participate in the Religio
mailing lists.

If you're interested in helping out with the civic government, you might
consider asking a magistrate if you could serve them as a scribe. It's a
good way to learn how a magistracy works.

Thanks for your interest, and your desire to help out.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40093 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Salvete omnes,

I just want to let everyone know that I will be interviewing the founders of Nova Roma shortly, most likely within the next week or so. This interview will be broadcast over Nova Roma Radio (Podcast) and the transcript will be published shortly after in the "Aquila". Twenty questions will be put to Marcus Cassius Iulianus and Patricia Cassia. I hope everyone enjoys hearing the answers to these questions.

Also, since I have not seen this posted here yet I would like to announce to everyone here that Champoin One Productions, the producers of the Nashville TN Roman Festival a couple of years ago is now in negotiations with the History Channel and HBO in order to have them sponsor a Roman Legion (with camp followers and Politicians :-) re-enactment contigent in the 2007 New Year's Day Parade of Roses in California. He believes this will be very possible because it perfectly serves to promote the second season of "Rome" which is scheduled to air shortly after that date. Gary Barbosa of Champoin One productions is negotiating to get them to pay for everyone's plane tickets there and back as well as hotel accomondations for the short stay there. So if you haven't joined a re-enactment legion yet, now's the time. Anyone got a Chariot?

Hopefully this in itself will get the public to become aware of us as a community.

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40094 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Salvete,

Let me provide some information for this process. The founders of Nova
Roma are Flavius Vedius Germanicus and Marcus Cassius Julianus.
Patrica Cassia, although a great contributor from the early days, has
never been considered a founder.

An interview that did not include Flavius Vedius would be incomplete
and somewhat of a slight.

Valete,

G. Popillius Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40095 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Response to Marcus Cassius Philippius
The RIGHT is not poised to take over anything. If it
were, why would I for one be so adamant? Oh, I can
only imagine what you will come up with now. You want
to debate privately? My address is listed so we can
spare the rest of the folks here from Americas Second
Civil War.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<robertpartlow@...> wrote:
> Salvete,
> I have often ignored such outbursts (whether
intended to be
> supportive of right-wing radical-subversives or
not)in order to keep
> discourse at a civil and intelligent level. Now I
feel that time is
> no longer constructive, given the extent of crazed
neo-con and
> religeous-fanatical control that threatens to
over-take this world.
> No group is immune from such destructive,
thoughtless, reactionism.
> My reason for reacting is the fact that McCarthy was
a drunk who
> destroyed the careers of many good thoughtful people
and helped cause
> the dumbing-down of our society which was to be a
new (Roman Republic
> of sorts) society based pluralism and respect for
all (non-
> destructive) attitudes. His rhetoric went against
this. Remember the
> movie "Spartacus"? It was produced by Kirk Douglas
who chose Stanley
> Kubrick(blacklisted by McCarthy) to direct it, as
the movie presented
> a mirrored period in Rome when M.Licinius
Crassus(money-grubbing
> emotionally-damaged street-urchin)used fear of
societal-collapse to
> take control of the government and turned society
toward a cesspool
> of stupidity and paranoia. As history actually
showed, he met his end
> along with thousands of good troops and a great deal
of denarii to
> attempt a takeover of the empire of a cooperative
eastern neighbor
> (left-well-enough-alone). Keep in mind it is not the
person toward
> which I am responding, but the statement which must
no longer go
> unchallenged. Such statements which go on with out
the proper
> discourse have (as presently illustrated by U.S.
society) led to a
> destructive quagmire of global proportion.
> Valvete,
> Appius Claudius Scipio
>
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40096 From: os390account Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Retaining Citizens
Salve et Salvete!

> I say this not to shoot you down, but to make clear the
> difficulties. A better course of action might be one of providing
> guidance to the provincial governments so that they could have
> local programs where existing citizens would voluntarily
> provide "welcome wagon" services to new citizens. The provincial
> governors have wide latitude in their potestas, and can do many
> things within their provinces that the central government can only
> do with a political process as described above.

My esteemed Marinus, I completely agree with you. I simply wanted
to toss this out into the forum to get some opinion.

> The Sodalitas Egressus has been working on recruitment matters.
>
> Perhaps this would be an area that Gn. Iulius Caesar and M. Audens
> could turn their considerable expertise toward. If Egressus were
> to develop a framework for provincial groups to use for their
> retention work, it might prove to be a very good thing indeed.


Sounds like great advice.

Gratias vobis ago.
Vale et valete!
Q. Valerius Callidus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40097 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: New E-mail
Salve Romans

I am having trouble with my spqr753@... email so I have changed my
email at yahoo. Please use this address spqr1947@... if you need
to communicate with me off list.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40098 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: THE CENSUS REPORT 2005, ADDENDA TO THE CENSUS 2005 REPORT and THE C
Salvete Patres et Conscripti et Quirites!

The following documents; the "Census Report 2005", two documents
called "the Census 2005 Recommendations" and "the Addenda to the
Census 2005 Report" will be found at the Nova Roma web site if one
clicks the following button:

The Bi-Annual Nova Roma Census
Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus, Censor has reported that the recent
Census of Nova Roma has been completed. The results and the analysis,
as well as the recommendations of the Officina Census CBFQ, are
available here.

This leads to the following page: http://www.novaroma.org/census2857.html

By publishing these documents I have fulfilled my duties with the
execution of the Census and hereby I declare the Census concluded in
all respects.

I have together with my skilled Scriba Primus Marcus Moravius
Piscinus Horatianus also chosen to publish some recommendations to
the next years Consuls of Nova Roma and its Senate and Populus. I am
sure other ideas will develop as the evaluation of the Census goes
on, this is only to be seen as our contribution as we saw it at the
end of the Census from our point of view as we where involved in the
Census.

Further: I would like to to thank the following citizens for a
fantastic job with the Census:

Marcus Moravius Piscinus Horatianus, Scriba Censoris Census Primus

Scribae Censoris Officinae Census:
Quintus Cassius Calvus; Marcus Octavius Germanicus; Marca Hortensia
Maior; Aulus Apollonius Cordus; Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus; Marcus
Antonius Biachius; Marcus Curiatius Complutensis and Manius
Constantinus Serapio

Further I also would like to thank Marcus Lucretius Agricola for
assistance beyond any call of duty.
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFBQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40099 From: S Ullerius Venator Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Deixippus
Valetudo quod fortuna,

I was thinking about old friends from Nova Roma who departed long and
long ago.

Damianus Lucianus Dexippus came to mind.

Anyone from New Jersey know of him?

Just wondering.

mille gratias - Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40100 From: DecimusGladiusLupus Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Nova Nova Roman Flags
Salve Paulinus,
I would be very interested in ordering one of the double sided flags if there are any available.
Vale; Decimus Gladius Lupus.

"Timothy P. Gallagher" <spqr753@...> wrote:

Salve Romans


I am in the process of ordering new Nova Roma flags that will be for sale to anybody who would like them.
The Flags will be like a modern national flag 3' by 5'. The will come in two styles, one sided, which means one side will be backward and two sided meaning that it will read right on both sides. I would like to get an idea of how may flags to order.

The cost of a one sided 3' by 5' flag will be about 40.00 each plus postage

The cost of a two sided 3' by 5' flag will be about 65.00 each plus postage

10% ( $4 or $6.50 ) will go to the Nova Roma Treasury for each flag sold.

Once the order has been placed it will be about 4 week to make the flags and for me to get them and start sending them out.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Ordo equester
Proprietor The Galerius Shop






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------






---------------------------------
Yahoo! Model Search - Could you be the next catwalk superstar? Check out the competition now

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Model Search - Could you be the next catwalk superstar? Check out the competition now

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40101 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Consul Fr. Apulus' absence [was: NR ELECTIONS: Missing Candidates?]
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Accensus Consulis Fr. Apuli Caesaris Quiritibus sal.:

Quirites, please forgive Consul Caesar his absence and the "missing candidates": As Accensus of the Consul I am informed from his cohors-mailinglist that he is absent until monday because he is forced to be in hospital for exams on his broken arm. He writes that he is reading the mails via wap and tgd elections will continue regularly.

Valete optime!
CN CORN LENTVLVS
Accensus



"Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> ha scritto:
Salvete Gaia Aurelia et A. Apploni Corde,

I sent my data in as instructed and have been confirmed by the
tribunes. Over the last three days I did the same twice for Consul
FAC but have not heard back yet. He could be tied up or the website
has delays as you say but for the record, I followed instructions.

Regards,

QSP


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@y...> wrote:
>
> A. Apollonius C. Aureliae omnibusque sal.
>
> Thanks for your vigilance and thoroughness! For my own
> part, all I can say is that I did cc my announcement
> to the proper address, received a private message fo
> acknowledgement from the consul, and replied to that
> in turn, so I clearly haven't slipped through that
> particular crack - presumably there is just an
> understandable delay before the website gets updated.
> The same may be true of the other "missing" candidates.
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Model Search 2005 - Find the next catwalk superstars -
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/model-search/
>






SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire Roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------






---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40102 From: STEPHEN GALLAGHER Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Nova Nova Roman Flags
Salve Decimus Gladius Lupus

You are the first person who has shown any interest in the flag. If I get more interest I will order some. I will keep a list of those who are interested and announce when you can order some.

Thanks

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


----- Original Message -----
From: DecimusGladiusLupus<mailto:hicksvillebozo@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Nova Nova Roman Flags


Salve Paulinus,
I would be very interested in ordering one of the double sided flags if there are any available.
Vale; Decimus Gladius Lupus.

"Timothy P. Gallagher" <spqr753@...<mailto:spqr753@...>> wrote:

Salve Romans


I am in the process of ordering new Nova Roma flags that will be for sale to anybody who would like them.
The Flags will be like a modern national flag 3' by 5'. The will come in two styles, one sided, which means one side will be backward and two sided meaning that it will read right on both sides. I would like to get an idea of how may flags to order.

The cost of a one sided 3' by 5' flag will be about 40.00 each plus postage

The cost of a two sided 3' by 5' flag will be about 65.00 each plus postage

10% ( $4 or $6.50 ) will go to the Nova Roma Treasury for each flag sold.

Once the order has been placed it will be about 4 week to make the flags and for me to get them and start sending them out.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Ordo equester
Proprietor The Galerius Shop






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------






---------------------------------
Yahoo! Model Search - Could you be the next catwalk superstar? Check out the competition now

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Model Search - Could you be the next catwalk superstar? Check out the competition now

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ> Fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA> The fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ>
Roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40103 From: Richard Sciarappa Date: 2005-12-01
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Salve,

How does one go about getting these podcasts?

PAX DEORUM

Lucius Cassius Cornutus






On Dec 1, 2005, at 4:16 PM, Sensei Phil Perez wrote:

> Salvete omnes,
>
> I just want to let everyone know that I will be interviewing the
> founders of Nova Roma shortly, most likely within the next week or so.
> This interview will be broadcast over Nova Roma Radio (Podcast) and
> the transcript will be published shortly after in the "Aquila". Twenty
> questions will be put to Marcus Cassius Iulianus and Patricia Cassia.
> I hope everyone enjoys hearing the answers to these questions.
>
> Also, since I have not seen this posted here yet I would like to
> announce to everyone here that Champoin One Productions, the producers
> of the Nashville TN Roman Festival a couple of years ago is now in
> negotiations with the History Channel and HBO in order to have them
> sponsor a Roman Legion (with camp followers and Politicians :-)
> re-enactment contigent in the 2007 New Year's Day Parade of Roses in
> California. He believes this will be very possible because it
> perfectly serves to promote the second season of "Rome" which is
> scheduled to air shortly after that date. Gary Barbosa of Champoin One
> productions is negotiating to get them to pay for everyone's plane
> tickets there and back as well as hotel accomondations for the short
> stay there. So if you haven't joined a re-enactment legion yet, now's
> the time. Anyone got a Chariot?
>
> Hopefully this in itself will get the public to become aware of us as
> a community.
>
> Vires et honos,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Ancient history
> Fall of the roman empire
> The fall of the roman empire
> Roman empire
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> ▪  Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>  
> ▪  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>  
> ▪  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40104 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Deixippus
---Salve Venii et Omnes:

Uncanny. I think about him from time to time myself. I hope he is
keeping well.

Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "S Ullerius Venator" <wend1066@g...>
wrote:
>
> Valetudo quod fortuna,
>
> I was thinking about old friends from Nova Roma who departed long and
> long ago.
>
> Damianus Lucianus Dexippus came to mind.
>
> Anyone from New Jersey know of him?
>
> Just wondering.
>
> mille gratias - Venator
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40105 From: ~The Kreick~ Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Nova Nova Roman Flags
Salve Tiberius Galerius Paulinus~

Please put me down for 1 2-sided flag as well, if you please.

Quintus Moravius Severus



On 12/1/05, STEPHEN GALLAGHER <spqr1947@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Decimus Gladius Lupus
>
> You are the first person who has shown any interest in the flag. If I get
> more interest I will order some. I will keep a list of those who are
> interested and announce when you can order some.
>
> Thanks
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: DecimusGladiusLupus<mailto:hicksvillebozo@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 6:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Nova Nova Roman Flags
>
>
> Salve Paulinus,
> I would be very interested in ordering one of
> the double sided flags if there are any available.
> Vale; Decimus Gladius Lupus.
>
> "Timothy P. Gallagher" <spqr753@...<mailto:spqr753@...>> wrote:
>
> Salve Romans
>
>
> I am in the process of ordering new Nova Roma flags that will be for
> sale to anybody who would like them.
> The Flags will be like a modern national flag 3' by 5'. The will come
> in two styles, one sided, which means one side will be backward and two
> sided meaning that it will read right on both sides. I would like to get an
> idea of how may flags to order.
>
> The cost of a one sided 3' by 5' flag will be about 40.00 each plus
> postage
>
> The cost of a two sided 3' by 5' flag will be about 65.00 each plus
> postage
>
> 10% ( $4 or $6.50 ) will go to the Nova Roma Treasury for each flag
> sold.
>
> Once the order has been placed it will be about 4 week to make the flags
> and for me to get them and start sending them out.
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Ordo equester
> Proprietor The Galerius Shop
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Model Search - Could you be the next catwalk superstar? Check
> out the competition now
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Model Search - Could you be the next catwalk superstar? Check
> out the competition now
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history<
> http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ>
> Fall of the roman empire<
> http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA>
> The fall of the roman empire<
> http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ>
>
> Roman empire<
> http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Ancient history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ> Fall
> of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA> The
> fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ> Roman
> empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw>
> ------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> - Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>"
> on the web.
>
> - To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> - Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40106 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Deixippus
Ave Po,

Good to hear directly from you. I hope that the Holy is smiling on
thee and thine.

I sometimes wonder how Maria Fimbria (alias Marius Fimbrius) and
Nicolas Moravius Vado are doing, also.

Overall, though, I think we've done good work here over the past 7 plus years.

=========================================
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poet

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/

--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40107 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: A Plea to the Quirites
> A. Tullia Scholastica A. Apollonio Cordo quiritibusque omnibus S.P.D.
>
> A. Apollonius C. Minucio omnibusque sal.
>
> I quite agree with your general appeal. In one
> respect, though, we're better off that you fear:
>
>> > We still need three Rogatores.
>
> Since there are only two vacancies for rogator in
> total, I suspect we really only need one more candidate.
>
> ATS: In fact, we already have two candidates for the position of rogator, and
> at least one for the position of aedilis plebis, and possibly one for the
> position of editor commentariorum, though that person announced on New Roman
> or one of the other boards.
>
> Vale, et ualete.
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40108 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Retaining Citizens
> Salue, Q. Valeri Callide, et saluete, quirites!
>
> Salvete Quirites!
>
> New citizens are a wonderful thing, no matter what sparked their
> interest initially. Look at the HBO "Rome" series. I'm sure its
> success has produced some kind of upsurge in many thing Roman,
> despite historic accuracy or inaccuracy. The movie "Gladiator" did
> something similar.
>
> With a return to "The Sopranos," people will be exposed to reruns of
> the series, and thus this particular source demographic might lessen
> until the second season airs, circa early 2007.
>
> So, what do we do with a bunch of inquisitive people, who wish to
> learn about Rome, and subsequently Nova Roma? It's akin to someone
> obtaining a driver's license, what with a large number of potential
> pamphlets and all, to read and memorize in expectation of taking a
> test to ensure that he or she will be a safe and conscientious
> operator.
>
> Driving is a privilege, not a right. Given that many potential
> citizens might venture here initially to learn a little more about
> what they've seen on TV or in the movies, and expect things to
> be "like that show on HBO or PBS," how can we walk with them through
> the process, without dumping them into a plethora of mailing lists,
> usually fraught with internal politics?
>
> I propose the formation of a committee to oversee the New Citizen
> Process, to investigate and review the current process, and find
> ways not only to make the experience more enjoyable for the new
> citizen, but also a way to reach out to more potential citizens.
>
> ATS: The Sodalitas Egressus seems to be engaged in similar activities.
>
> Inspired by Praefect Equestria Iunia Laeca's efforts with a "Place
> To Go" for members of my own province of Nova Britannia, I would
> propose the formation of a group of volunteers, whose function would
> be to "Welcome" new citizens, and play a dual role as both "Mentor"
> and "Paedagogus" to assist these new citizens during their
> probationary period. These people would work one-on-one with the new
> citizens; a few Novi assigned to each volunteer. They would
> personally help them navigate, mentor them, teach them, and
> demonstrate to them that they ARE an already active and important
> part of Nova Roma.
>
> ATS: This is a good idea, but as our censor has pointed out, would
> require jumping through several governmental hoops prior to implementation.
> It also supposes that there are a lot of citizens willing to guide others on a
> formal basis as some of us do on an informal basis. The censorial scribae do
> some of this with the citizen prospects, and there is also the NewRoman list
> where questions may be asked and answered in a calmer environment than that of
> the ML. Please note, too, that there are days when we in the censor¹s office
> receive twenty or more new citizen applications‹every citizen would have to
> mentor another, or several others, to manage that volume. Perhaps an
> extension of the tirocinium and such assistance could be possible; it
> certainly would be nice to do this if we could get through the hoops and find
> the mentors, though realistically, it may have to be more like a class than a
> paidagogos situation.
>
>
> Additionally, each new citizen thus helped would then be able to
> function as a helper, thereby allowing the new citizen to become
> involved immediately. After all, "Discimus ut discimur." (pardon my
> spelling and grammar errors) I learn the most when I teach, since
> my students as me questions that challenge myself. I should think
> the same would be true for new citizens.
>
> ATS: I was a freshman guide in undergraduate college, so I have some
> familiarity with this.
>
> As for the aphorism, I suspect that it¹s Œdocemus ut discamus,¹ Œwe teach
> so that we may learn.¹ There are other similar proverbs.
>
> As members now responsible for the education of others, I believe
> that new citizens themselves would contribute the most to citizen
> retention.
>
> ATS: Yes, and they often do help the newer citizens. So do those of us
> who¹ve been around a while.
>
> As my toga begins to slide off my shoulder, I'll end this thought,
> but I welcome any and all questions and discussions regarding the
> potential of this holistic approach.
>
> Valete!
> Q. Valerius Callidus
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40109 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: The Census: A Job Well Done
CN·SALVIVS·ASTVR·QVIRITIBVS·S·P·D

I would like to dedicate just a few words to thank all the people who
have taken part in the census and to congratulate them for an
excellent job.

I have the impression that this census will effectively prove to be a
turning point in the progress of Nova Roma. For the first time, we
have clear indications of the demographics of Nova Roma. This is
already stirring some interesting debate (How could we attract more
new citizens? And how could we keep those citizens whose interest
simply fades over time?). I sincerely hope that this debate will
eventually lead to some improvements in our recruitment methods.

Once again, thank you. We really, really needed this.

S·V·B·E·E·V

CN·SALVIVS·T·F·A·NEP·OVF·ASTVR·SCRIPSIT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40110 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: The Census: A Job Well Done
G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Quiritibus SPD.

In the (almost) year that I have been around Nova Roma, and
in the seven months that I have been a civis, the entire
census process, and especially the very detailed report by
C. Fabius Buteo Quintillianus, are the most impressive
pieces of work that I have seen come through the Main List.

To Censor Fabius and his team, who have invested hundreds
of hours in making this census possible, magnas gratias ago.
Each of you sets a fine example for anyone coming into NR.

As others have said, we have at last a clear picture of the
populus which is the foundation NR's future. To choose the
architects, every single assidui needs to vote.

Valete bene in pace Deorum

G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Salvius Astur
<cn.salvius.astur@g...> wrote:
>
> CN·SALVIVS·ASTVR·QVIRITIBVS·S·P·D
>
> I would like to dedicate just a few words to thank all the people who
> have taken part in the census and to congratulate them for an
> excellent job.
>
> I have the impression that this census will effectively prove to be a
> turning point in the progress of Nova Roma. For the first time, we
> have clear indications of the demographics of Nova Roma. This is
> already stirring some interesting debate (How could we attract more
> new citizens? And how could we keep those citizens whose interest
> simply fades over time?). I sincerely hope that this debate will
> eventually lead to some improvements in our recruitment methods.
>
> Once again, thank you. We really, really needed this.
>
> S·V·B·E·E·V
>
> CN·SALVIVS·T·F·A·NEP·OVF·ASTVR·SCRIPSIT
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40111 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: PRO SABINO
M. LVCRETIVS AGRICOLA OMNIBVS S.P.D.

Fellow Nova Romans, and especially Citizens, I come before you now to
speak of that sadest of all human feelings, regret.

How often in life are the senses attracted by superficial things! How
sad that later, sense and wisdom, operating in retrospective show that
we have missed something of great value but of modest appearance!

My remarks hold true of people as well as things. It is easy to take
notice of those who step forward speaking loudly. Yet how often, in
the shadows of the boisterous and noisy can we discern, if we are
wise, the modest figures of those who put forth all their energies
modestly yet so effectively.

My regret is that I had a chance recently to meet just such a modest
and hard-working person. Yet in my folly I did not avail myself more
completely of the opportunity to forge the bonds of friendship with him.

I am speaking of the excellent citizen of Dacia and candidate for the
Curule Aedileship, Titus Iulius Sabinus.

I would like to tell you a few things I learned about Titus Iulius
Sabinus. First, in spite of the economic difficulties of his
macronational home, he is a small business owner. That alone, if you
understand the circumstances, should be enough to tell you that he is
not only exceptionally hardworking, but farsighted and courageous.

The second thing I learned is that not only does Titus Iulius Sabinus
have a family, but his family are fellow Cives as well. If it is the
mark of a good Roman that that Rome be a part of one's daily life,
then who could be a better Roman than one who lives a Roman family life?

Of course, the wonderful work that Titus Iulius Sabinus has done in
setting up the Provincia of Dacia can be seen by all. Look at the list
of citizens, look at the complete set of Provincial officers, look at
the Provincial web site. It is impossible to deny that this is
organizing work of the first class.

Anyone who reads this list knows the demeanor of Titus Iulius Sabinus.
That he speaks always with the greatest humility and courtesy is known
to all. What I learned in speaking with him face to face is that he
also speaks with the greatest sincerity. Anyone who cares to examine
the posts of Titus Iulius Sabinus, not only here but on other lists,
will find ample evidence of this.

In short, I find that Titus Iulius Sabinus is well suited by his
experience, by his ability, by his demonstrated dedication, by his
personality, by all his qualities of Romanitas, for the office of
Curule Aedile or any other office he may seek. I urge all Citizens to
join me in supporting Titus Iulius Sabinus for Curule Aedle.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40112 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: post. Kal. Dec.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodies est postridie Kalendas Decembris; haec dies nefastus aterque est.

"Neither of these plans was approved and Herennius was carried home
from the camp. In the Roman camp, after many fruitless attempts had
been made to break out and they found themselves at last in a state of
utter destitution, necessity compelled them to send envoys to the
Samnites to ask in the first instance for fair terms of peace, and
failing that to challenge them to battle. Pontius replied that all war
was at an end, and since even now that they were vanquished and
captured they were incapable of acknowledging their true position, he
should deprive them of their arms and send them under the yoke,
allowing them to retain one garment each. The other conditions would
be fair to both victors and vanquished. If they evacuated Samnium and
withdrew their colonists from his country, the Roman and the Samnite
would henceforth live under their own laws as sovereign states united
by a just and honourable treaty. On these conditions he was ready to
conclude a treaty with the consuls, if they rejected any of them he
forbade any further overtures to be made to him. When the result was
announced, such a universal cry of distress arose, such gloom and
melancholy prevailed, that they evidently could not have taken it more
heavily if it had been announced to them all that they must die on the
spot. Then followed a long silence. The consuls were unable to breathe
a word either in favour of a capitulation so humiliating or against
one so necessary. At last L. Lentulus, of all the staff-officers the
most distinguished, both by his personal qualities and the offices he
had held, spoke: "I have often," he said, "heard my father, consuls,
say that he was the only one in the Capitol who refused to ransom the
City from the Gauls with gold, for the force in the Capitol was not
invested and shut in with fosse and rampart, as the Gauls were too
indolent to undertake that sort of work; it was therefore quite
possible for them to make a sortie involving, perhaps, heavy loss, but
not certain destruction. If we had the same chance of fighting,
whether on favourable or unfavourable ground, which they had of
charging down upon the foe from the Capitol, in the same way as the
besieged have often made sorties against their besiegers, I should not
fall behind my father's spirit and courage in the advice which I
should give. To die for one's country is, I admit, a glorious thing,
and as concerns myself I am ready to devote myself for the people and
legions of Rome or to plunge into the midst of the enemy. But it is
here that I behold my country, it is on this spot that all the legions
which Rome possesses are gathered, and unless they wish to rush to
death for their own sakes, to save their honour, what else have they
that they can save by their death. 'The dwellings of the City,'
somebody may reply, ' and its walls, and that crowd of human beings
who form its population.' Nay, on the contrary, all these things are
not saved, they are handed over to the enemy if this army is
annihilated. For who will protect them? A defenceless multitude of
non-combatants, I suppose; as successfully as it defended them from
the approach of the Gauls. Or will they implore the help of an army
from Veii with Camillus at its head ? Here and here alone are all our
hopes, all our strength. If we save these we save our country, if we
give these up to death we desert and betray our country. 'Yes,' you
say, 'but surrender is base and ignominious.' It is; but true
affection for our country demands that we should preserve it, if need
be, by our disgrace as much as by our death. However great then the
indignity, we must submit to it and yield to the compulsion of
necessity, a compulsion which the gods themselves cannot evade! Go,
consuls, give up your arms as a ransom for that State which your
ancestors ransomed with gold!" - Livy, History of Rome 9.4


On this day in A.D. 1814, Donatien Alphonse Francois, comte de Sade
(although he always referred to himself as the "Marquis de Sade"),
died at the insane asylum at Charenton (now Saint-Maurice,
Val-de-Marne) near Paris.


Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40113 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Candidates for Censor
G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana C. Minucio Scaevolae omnibusque SPD.

In Post #40055, very grave concerns are raised regarding the
candidacy of Q. Fabius Maximus for Censor.

Since then there have been some supportive posts, but I
have not found any explicit refutation of any of the
statements made by C. M. Scaevola.

This raises serious concerns of my own, as a first-time
voter in the annual elections. If Nova Roma follows
common real-world practice where the number of candidates
is less than (or equal to)the number of seats to be filled,
*all* of the candidates for that position are declared elected,
regardless of how many votes they get.

Any opinions about the candidates will be moot. My vote
(and all other votes)will count for nothing.

I would remind everyone who objects to Q. Fabius Maximus
holding the office of Censor, that, unless at least one
other qualified candidate declares for the office of Censor,
and communicates that declaration to the proper e-addresses
before the deadline, QFM will be elected by acclamation.

As matters stand (late evening December 1) there are still
only 2 declared candidates for Censor on NR's main website
"List of Candidates" There are two positions to be filled.

Barring a third candidate, QFM's election is assured.

Now if someone could tell me--is there a God of Democratic
Process? If there is, some invocations are due, not only
for the office of Censor, but for other offices needing
candidates.

Valete bene in pace Deorum.

G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40114 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: The Census: A Job Well Done
Salve Amice!

I thank You for your kind words on the behalf of
the Offiicina Census in Cohors Censoris CFBQ. I
have already thanked these fantastic citizens
with Marcus Moravius Piscinus Horatianus as their
leader. I have been very privileged as a Nova
Roman magistrate to be able to recruit citizens
with such quality as my assistants. I must also
add a heartfelt thanks to the many governors who
have done a very good job!

Yes we need to let this be a turning point in the
development of Nova Roma. Please read the
recommendations that follow the Census Report. I
would say that we need to concentrate on the
face-to-face meetings and sbuld local groups and
from there build Provinciae with a strong bound
between the local groups (Lex Fabia de Oppidis et
Municipiis
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2003-10-08-v.html
) and each Provincia. Occasions like the Roman
Days or Roman Market days in USA and the
Conventii in Europe are also very important in
building long lasting bounds between our citizens
which is something that will get citizens to stay
in the Res Publica.

I also sincerely believe that the "citizen test"
and the contacts with applicants about getting a
Roman name has changed the quality of applicants
that end up as citizens. Further the "New Roman"
list is already functioning as a kind of guide
into Nova Roman life. But nothing can beat the
face-to-face meeting!


>CN·SALVIVS·ASTVR·QVIRITIBVS·S·P·D
>
>I would like to dedicate just a few words to thank all the people who
>have taken part in the census and to congratulate them for an
>excellent job.
>
>I have the impression that this census will effectively prove to be a
>turning point in the progress of Nova Roma. For the first time, we
>have clear indications of the demographics of Nova Roma. This is
>already stirring some interesting debate (How could we attract more
>new citizens? And how could we keep those citizens whose interest
>simply fades over time?). I sincerely hope that this debate will
>eventually lead to some improvements in our recruitment methods.
>
>Once again, thank you. We really, really needed this.
>
>S·V·B·E·E·V
>
>CN·SALVIVS·T·F·A·NEP·OVF·ASTVR·SCRIPSIT

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFBQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40115 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Candidates for Censor
Salvete:

We are only electing ONE person for Censor.

The office of Censor is a two year term. Each year we elect one Censor.
The person assuming the office of Censor this year will become the Junior
Censor. Right now my pater Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus is senior
Censor, and Gnaeus Equitius Marinus is junior Censor. After the election,
whoever is elected will become junior Censor and Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
will become the senior Censor.

So only one person this year will be elected Censor.

As I have stated in the past I will vote for Gaius Minucius Hadrianus
Felix. He is a very ethical, and dedicated man who will serve our Republic
without reservation.

Valete;

C. Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 12/2/05, G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana <silvanatextrix@...> wrote:
>
> G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana C. Minucio Scaevolae omnibusque SPD.
>
> In Post #40055, very grave concerns are raised regarding the
> candidacy of Q. Fabius Maximus for Censor.
>
> Since then there have been some supportive posts, but I
> have not found any explicit refutation of any of the
> statements made by C. M. Scaevola.
>
> This raises serious concerns of my own, as a first-time
> voter in the annual elections. If Nova Roma follows
> common real-world practice where the number of candidates
> is less than (or equal to)the number of seats to be filled,
> *all* of the candidates for that position are declared elected,
> regardless of how many votes they get.
>
> Any opinions about the candidates will be moot. My vote
> (and all other votes)will count for nothing.
>
> I would remind everyone who objects to Q. Fabius Maximus
> holding the office of Censor, that, unless at least one
> other qualified candidate declares for the office of Censor,
> and communicates that declaration to the proper e-addresses
> before the deadline, QFM will be elected by acclamation.
>
> As matters stand (late evening December 1) there are still
> only 2 declared candidates for Censor on NR's main website
> "List of Candidates" There are two positions to be filled.
>
> Barring a third candidate, QFM's election is assured.
>
> Now if someone could tell me--is there a God of Democratic
> Process? If there is, some invocations are due, not only
> for the office of Censor, but for other offices needing
> candidates.
>
> Valete bene in pace Deorum.
>
> G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40116 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
A. Apollonius L. Cassio omnibusque sal.

> How does one go about getting these podcasts?

We've had some technical problems and therefore
haven't been able to start broadcasting yet, but when
we start, there will be plenty of publicity, including
details of how to listen.





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40117 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: PRO SABINO
SALVE LUCRETI AGRICOLA !

I want to thank you for your kindly support. It was very nice for me to meet you. I'm still looking to the CD coins and I hope you have a good impression about my province CD.
More then a lot of superficial things, our meetings are the good part of NR. I realized that when I return home.
When we are in the middle of the events, the time fly, the momments fast succesion limited our sensorial perceptions. Sure we talk a lot. But not enaugh. Then after all of that pass, we realize that this kind of momments are unique. Yes, we must have with priority this purpose. To transform that unique momments as a ordinary one, year after year in NR and quarterly in our provinces.
Still then, many greetings, Agricola amice.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

"M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@...> wrote:
M. LVCRETIVS AGRICOLA OMNIBVS S.P.D.

Fellow Nova Romans, and especially Citizens, .....



"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Shopping
Find Great Deals on Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40118 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Candidates for Censor
A. Apollonius C. Aureliae omnibusque sal.

> Now if someone could tell me--is there a God of
> Democratic
> Process? If there is, some invocations are due, not
> only
> for the office of Censor, but for other offices
> needing
> candidates.

Interesting question. Libertas was certainly regarded
as a sort of divine personification, and the concept
of libertas was closely associated with the republican
institutions including the voting-assemblies. There
was also a sort of religious aura around the concept
of majestas populi Romani (the 'greaterness' of the
Roman people), and one could say that the power to
elect magistrates is one of the things which
contributes to the people's majestas.



___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Model Search 2005 - Find the next catwalk superstars - http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/model-search/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40119 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Salve Laene,

It's hard to believe someone would have a problem with even this simple announcement. Critics abound for every little thing. Is it any wonder people leave our community in droves. Since I have no idea who Flavius Vedius is or where he may reside, why don't you interview him and then we'll have a complete interview. Just in two parts, mine and yours. If you are unwilling to do this, why bring it up? Just to slam someone who is trying hard to contribute something positive to our community? This is what the ML is famous for, isn't it? I do thank you for that information though, up to now from every source I have seen, Patricia has always been mentioned and included as a co-founder. I guess now I'll have 21 questions to ask ;-)

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus


----- Original Message -----
From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 4:33 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Founder's Interview, etc.


Salvete,

Let me provide some information for this process. The founders of Nova
Roma are Flavius Vedius Germanicus and Marcus Cassius Julianus.
Patrica Cassia, although a great contributor from the early days, has
never been considered a founder.

An interview that did not include Flavius Vedius would be incomplete
and somewhat of a slight.

Valete,

G. Popillius Laenas





SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
Roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.10/190 - Release Date: 12/1/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40120 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Candidates for Censor
Salve Gaia Aurelia, et salvete quirites,

G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana wrote:

> G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana C. Minucio Scaevolae omnibusque SPD.
>
> In Post #40055, very grave concerns are raised regarding the
> candidacy of Q. Fabius Maximus for Censor.
>
> Since then there have been some supportive posts, but I
> have not found any explicit refutation of any of the
> statements made by C. M. Scaevola.

That would be because there is no possible refutation. Scaevola
reported the facts of the matter.

Fortunately for you, and all others who are concerned about the idea of
a man like Q. Fabius Maximus getting access to the census database,
another choice is available. G. Minucius Hadrianus has also declared
his candidacy for the one Censor position available. I would encourage
you to vote for him.

Vale, et valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40121 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Response to a question asked to me in private
[Note: This is also published on my blog at: http://modianus.blogspot.com]

---

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

A question was proposed to me privately regarding my reaction, as a
Pontifex, to the catastrophe in New Orleans. The request was for me to
clarify my position. I am not going to mention the persons name who
requested the clarification, if he or she desires to identify who they then
that is their choice. I was, however, requested to respond in public.

I posted to the main forum the following (in part) in the aftermath of
hurricane Katrina:

Salvete;

I have issued my concern for the survivors of Katrina, and my concern for a
citizen of Nova Roma who I knew was from the area -- L. Modia Lupa (our
Vestal), whom we have found out is safe.

I do not have an official statement on Katrina, nor upon what has happened
to New Orleans. As a person, I can speculate philosophically that I believe
the Gods of Rome are ambivalent about the place. Why should they care? The
people of New Orleans do not make sacrifice to the Gods of Rome, and they do
not honor them. The magistrates of the city do not make regular offerings, and
New Orleans has no Collegium Pontificum of its own. So why should the Gods
of Rome care?

L. Modia Lupa believes in the Gods. She was in New Orleans. She made it out
successfully. Perhaps they have blessed her, by assisting her departure from
the city.

I DO NOT believe the Gods willed anything to happen. In the sense of being
malicious. However, I don't believe they concern themselves -- that is in
giving blessings -- with people and places who do not honor them. So while I
follow the disaster of Katrina on a daily basis, and am very saddened by
what has happened. As a pontifex I do not see anything that would be of a
concern. AS A PONTIFEX I make offerings to the Gods for the CITIZENS of Nova
Roma -- not the citizens of the United States. There are some citizens in
the gulf area, then I pray for them in my capacity as a priest of Nova Roma.
As a person, outside of my duties as a priest in Nova Roma, I have prayed
for the people afflicted by this most horrible tragedy. Hope what I am
explaining makes sense. I also hope it doesn't make me sound like a horrible
person. I am very compassionate about what has happened after the onslaught
of Katrina. I follow the disaster closely, and my heart goes out to the
people. But in my capacity as a priest of Nova Roma, I am concerned with
Nova Romans; their success, safety, and well being. But my official
offerings -- as a pontifex and flamen --- to the Gods are for citizens of
Nova Roma.
Valete;
C. Fabius Buteo Modianus

The individual that sent me the private e-mail, but asked that I respond on
the main list, raised the following questions, and concerns based upon the
above mentioned post. I appreciate this person's willingness to seek
clarification:


This is the part of your post I have most difficulty with. It reminds me
very much of the attitudes of the "religions of the book": Christianity,
Islam and Judaism. All of them have practiced an exclusionary outlook: our
way is the only way to be saved. Yet the Declaration of the RR states in
part (my emphases added):

"We affirm that the Roman Pagan Religion belongs to no one race or
nationality, but is instead a *common founding heritage of all Western
civilization.* It is further a universal spiritual current which throughout
the centuries has *influenced all peoples and nations of the world*, either
directly or by the legacy of its history, philosophies and practices.

We also affirm that the Roman Pagan Religion is compatible with, and may be
practiced alongside all other forms of religion and spiritual expression,
without diluting or diminishing its basic ideals and spiritual identity. In
the ancient world Roman religion was practiced alongside Celtic, German,
Greek, Egyptian, Persian, and Oriental faiths, to the enhancement of all. *This
syncretistic approach to other religions remains basic to the Roman Pagan
spiritual world view."*

Even the access page to the RR on the Main website carries the following
information (again, my added emphases):

". . . Roman religion is a unique product of the culture that created it. It
is a faith that demands steadfastness and devotion to duty. It involves
working in harmony with the eternal gods and with universal order, *for the
benefit not only of ourselves but also the world around us*; with right
action and attitudes towards the gods, both the State and the individual
will prosper. . . ."

I would assume that "the world around us" includes the victims of all
disasters--and my, has NR ML been mum on the disastrous earthquake in
Pakistan and environs. I would assume that "a syncretistic approach"
includes acknowledgement that some people choose to worship in a different
way.

What I see as a concern, is how this attitude would be perceived by "the
world around us" in your potential role as Consul, representing NR to that
world. In our interconnected world, I am concerned that washing NR's hands
(they would be NR's and not yours) of "anything that would be a concern"
could lead to even more people washing their hands of Nova Roma (q.v. the
latest census report by your adoptive father, C. Fabius Buteo
Quintillianus).

Interconnectivity is leading even some elements of the exclusionary
religions to become more involved in "the world around us", working not for
conversions to their faith, but simply - *for the benefit not only of
ourselves but also the world around us;* cf especially at this moment, the
Christian Peacemakers in Iraq, and Muslim support for their members now held
hostage. These are people of faiths that make no claim to be "syncretistic."

Your personal reaction is what I would anticipate from your previous
communications with me--humane and reflective.

The foregoing does not make you "sound like a horrible person": you have
delineated your personal attitudes carefully. But to my ears, it does make
Nova Roma sound like a pretty callous organization. I would very much like
to hear how you would publicly present Nova Roma's attitudes to world events
in your role as Consul. It would be helpful if such a reply were made on
the Main List, because I believe this issue is of import to all voters in
the upcoming election. You may quote any of this e-mail as you see fit.


This is my response:

As Flamen Pomonalis I make public offerings several times a year to honor
the Goddess Pomona, and in doing so I honor several other Gods and Goddesses
as well. Here is an excerpt of the ritual used in English:


"Goddess Pomona, by offering this incense to you I pray good prayers, so
that you may be willingly propitious to me and the Senate and People of the
Novaromans, the Quirites."



The prayer is for the Deity to be propitious to me (the one making the
offering), the Senate of Nova Roma (as Polybius mentions, "�The 'people' are
dependant upon the Senate, and must aim to please it both in public and in
private."), and the people of Nova Roma (those who are citizens). This is
the customary ritual formula.



The state religion of Nova Roma and the Gods of the state religion are not
seen as omnipotent and omnipresent as is the God of Christianity, Islam, or
Judaism. John Scheid in his Introduction to Roman Religion states, "The
civic image of 'citizen gods' was confirmed by numerous rituals and rules,
and may be regarded as one of the major interpretations of traditional Roman
religion." The Gods of the state religion of Nova Roma are seen as a part
of the Roman community that we seek to build, and honoring them helps to
maintain the Pax Deorum.



Jo-Ann Shelton writes in her book, "As the Romans did, a Sourcebook in Roman
Social History," "The Roman gods did not demand constant professions of
faith, but they did require that humans respect their power and acknowledge
their participation in the universe. Acknowledgement of the gods formed the
ritual of Roman religion. Since the earliest rituals had been effective in
securing the cooperation of the deities � the success and prosperity
of Romeproved that divine forces were cooperative � Romans preserved
the rituals."



The state religion of Nova Roma is concerned with the Pax Deorum, or "peace
with the Gods." A sense of universalism, is in my opinion, more reminiscent
of Pax Romana, or "the Roman peace." Publius Vergilius Maro (Virgil) writes
in his Aeneid about the Roman ideal, "You, Roman, do not fail to govern all
people with your supreme authority. These will be your skills: to
establish law and order within a framework of peace, to be merciful to those
who submit, to crush in war those who are arrogant." To claim a sense of
pietas (duty and obligation) outside of the "Senate and People of Nova Roma"
is a danger that I would caution Nova Roma not to pursue. Nova Roma is not
concerned with governing all people with supreme authority.



The Nova Roma constitution states, "As the spiritual heir to the ancient
Roman Republic and Empire, Nova Roma shall endeavor to exist, in all manners
practical and acceptable, as the modern restoration of the ancient Roman
Republic. The culture, religion, and society of Nova Roma shall be patterned
upon those of ancient Rome." It is not practical to impose the obligation
of pietas (within the confines of Nova Roma) upon anyone outside of Nova
Roma.



The above explanation should address my point that the state religion of
Nova Roma is concerned with the Gods being propitious to the Senate and
People of Nova Roma, and not to citizens outside of Nova Roma. This, of
course, does NOT mean that the state religion wishes to prevent the Gods of
Rome to be propitious to all people. The state religion is only concerned
that the Gods are propitious to the Senate and People of Nova Roma, as
Cicero stated in, "The Nature of the Gods, "Jupiter is Best and Greatest not
because he makes us just or sober or wise, but because he makes us healthy
and right and prosperous."



The Constitution of Nova Roma states, "The priesthoods of the Gods of Rome
shall be organized as closely as practical on the ancient Roman model. The
institutions of the Religio Romana shall have authority over religious
matters on the level of the state and nation only, maintaining the religious
rites of the State and providing resources pertaining to the Religio Romana
which Citizens may make use of if they choose. Nova Roma shall approach all
other religions with a syncretistic outlook, offering friendship to all
paths which acknowledge the right of those who practice and honor the
Religio Romana to do so and respect the beliefs thereof." The state
religion of Nova Roma is concerned with "religious matters on the level of
the state and nation only," and not on matters that pertain to victims of
natural disaster, which would be outside of our jurisdiction.


This does not take away from the syncretistic nature of Roman Religion. There
are people in Nova Roma, like myself, who do not limit their spiritual
practices to the Religio only. There are citizens of Nova Roma who identify
with Buddhism, Gnosticism, Druidry, and other spiritual practices. They can
do this, and still help to maintain the Pax Deorum. The Gods of Rome (and
Nova Roma) are concerned with "being acknowledged and honored," and this
does not mean that one has to honor the Gods of (Nova) Roma exclusively. This
is the meaning of the syncretistic nature of Roman Religion. The priests
MUST make offerings according to tradition, and should NOT mix other
traditions with the Religio. But this does not mean that priests, or
citizen alike, has to limit their spiritual practice to only that of the
Religio.


The words I am stating here is MY official position as a Pontifex of Nova
Roma, this is not the Collegial opinion of the whole Collegium
Pontificum. However,
let me illustrate the difference between my personal perspective and my
practices as a Pontifex. To use an example: Lets say your home is financed
with a mortgage through Bank X, and lets say that natural disaster strikes
and your bank is unsympathetic and demands that you keep up your mortgage
payments current with no grace period (lets also assume there is a lot of
red tape with the insurance company). Going to Bank Y would not help you a
single bit, as Bank Y is concerned with their customers and is not concerned
with the business practices of Bank X. Your agreement is with Bank X, and
not with Bank Y, so it would not follow that Bank Y would be able to assist
you. However, that is not to say that the person at Bank Y is unsympathetic
to your plight. This example, I hope, illustrates the relationship between
the Gods of the Religio Romana of Nova Roma and the Senate and People of
Nova Roma, and the victims of world catastrophe. As a Pontifex within Nova
Roma I can, and am, very concerned and sympathetic to the plight of others
throughout the world. I have made offerings as a human being, and as a
member of the world community, on behalf of victims of several world
calamities. As I find out about them, I pray for their wellbeing. But
these offerings are not done under the guise of my being a priest in Nova
Roma.


I believe it is virtuous to want to help others in times of need. I have
donated to the American Red Cross, out of my own pocket to assist in the
Katrina Relief Fund. I am very sympathetic to the suffering of others, not
only in the United States but also in other countries regardless of their
nationality, race, or religious persuasion.


The Religio Romana is not a "ministerial" religion, were the priests of Nova
Roma "minister" to the people, and in the case of natural disaster it is not
appropriate for the state religion to feel compelled to "minister" to the
survivors and victims of said disaster. This is simply not the way of the
Religio Romana. However, it is meritorious and virtuous in my opinion for
citizens of Nova Roma to assist in the relief of survivors and victims of
natural disasters, war, and other calamities. It is simply the human thing
to do: to care about other people. This might be under the purview of the
various provincial governments of Nova Roma.


Let me attempt to clarify the phrase from "Roman Religion in Antiquity and
Today" on the Nova Roma website, "for the benefit not only of ourselves but
also the world around us�" This phrase is somewhat misleading. It would
insinuate that rites and rituals are done by the state Religio for the
benefit of the world. As I have illustrated above, at length, this is not
the case. What is implied by this statement, as far as my interpretation,
is that Roman Religion is an approach to spirituality that is beneficial to
everyone � a universal approach, outside of the official state function. The
approach of honoring the dead (ancestors), and of honoring the Lars and
Penates, and the Roman approach to religion are of benefit to the world. By
Nova Roma resurrecting the practices of honoring the Gods of Roma, and
therefore making an agreement with these Gods so that they may be the Gods
of Nova Roma we are benefiting the world. We are reconstructing something
that would otherwise have been lost to the world. Citizenship in Nova Roma
is open to anyone regardless of "�ethnic heritage, gender, religious
affiliation, or sexual orientation (from the Constitition)." We make it
fairly easy for people to join us in our endeavor to reconstruct Rome.


I am not sure if this is the answer that this individual wanted to see. But
it is an honest answer, and one that I believe in. As a conclusion, to this
I would like to add that I am � and have always been � very sympathetic to
the suffering of others. I am empathic enough to understand the pain others
feel who are in situations of extreme distress. However difficult
situations in the world may become, the focus of Nova Roma needs to be on
the restoration and reconstruction of Roma in a modern context in conformity
with our laws, and traditions � always keeping an eye on tradition, but not
loosing sight of our current situation and sentimentalities. This being
said, Nova Roma cannot provide charity to the world (as the Senate realized
in a resent Senatus Consultum on the subject), and we have to be mindful of
our relationship with the Gods. The Gods of Roma, and of Nova Roma, were
and are "citizen Gods," and it would be a dishonor to them if we expanded
their jurisdiction to not only be propitious to us, but also to those who
choose not to acknowledge them. This, I believe, would have an impact on
the Pax Deorum.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40122 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Salve,

It is not my intention to "slam" anyone. If you do not know who
Flavius Vedius Germanicus is, you should be glad of the information.

Falvius Vedius and Marcus Cassius started Nova Roma together.
Flavius Vedius served as Consul, Senator, and Dictator. He
spearheaded many of our laws and wrote the Constitution. To talk
about an interview with the founders as one of Marcus Cassius and
Patricia Cassia is simply wrong, and unfairly leaves out the person
who was really THE major contributor.

I applaud your energy in arranging this. However, I suggest you
read the "Annals of Nova Roma" on the website. It will give you
some background into about the founding of NR, Flavius Vedius, and
some background info. you can use in your inetrview.

You should be able to contact Flavius vedius through his albim
webpage here:

http://www.novaroma.org/bin/view/civis?id=27

Best of luck on your project.

Vale,

Laenas

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Sensei Phil Perez"
<senseiphil@n...> wrote:
>
> Salve Laene,
>
> It's hard to believe someone would have a problem with even this
simple announcement. Critics abound for every little thing. Is it
any wonder people leave our community in droves. Since I have no
idea who Flavius Vedius is or where he may reside, why don't you
interview him and then we'll have a complete interview. Just in two
parts, mine and yours. If you are unwilling to do this, why bring it
up? Just to slam someone who is trying hard to contribute something
positive to our community? This is what the ML is famous for, isn't
it? I do thank you for that information though, up to now from every
source I have seen, Patricia has always been mentioned and included
as a co-founder. I guess now I'll have 21 questions to ask ;-)
>
> Vires et honos,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 4:33 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
>
>
> Salvete,
>
> Let me provide some information for this process. The founders
of Nova
> Roma are Flavius Vedius Germanicus and Marcus Cassius Julianus.
> Patrica Cassia, although a great contributor from the early
days, has
> never been considered a founder.
>
> An interview that did not include Flavius Vedius would be
incomplete
> and somewhat of a slight.
>
> Valete,
>
> G. Popillius Laenas
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The
fall of the roman empire
> Roman empire
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.10/190 - Release Date:
12/1/2005
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40123 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Salve Philippe.

Although Laenas didn't answer your post specifically as Consul,
being both his friend and his Accensus and knowing that he is very
busy at the moment, I will take the liberty of answering for him (as
his friend).

Firstly in our Annals
(http://novaroma.org/annales/2751/resignat.htm) the entry for 18th
September 1998 ends thus:

"Although the nation would continue to regret the sudden loss of its
co-founder, Flavius Vedius Germanicus, it was now clear that Nova
Roma had weathered its first crisis intact. The Republic would live
on."

Vedius can no doubt be contacted via the web mail feature accessed
via his entry at:

http://novaroma.org/bin/view/civis?id=27

I think Laenas was trying to ensure that you were made aware of
Vedius and no doubt to head off, through a public post rather than
private email, the very possible negative reaction to this omission.
I feel certain that Laenas was attempting to ensure that no one felt
slighted. It wasn't a slam and neither was he implying even a huge
possible slight, just "somewhat of a slight".

Vale
Gnaeus Iulius Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Sensei Phil Perez"
<senseiphil@n...> wrote:
>
> Salve Laene,
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40124 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Founders of Nova Roma
Avete Omnes,

I have a printout of the entire Nova Roma website date stamped 07/26/98 16:04:45

One of the sections in the Camenaeum is a Timeline of Roman History.

The last entry is:

"2751 AUC 1998 CE Nova Roma is founded by Flavius Vedius
Germanicus (Germanicus) and Marcus Cassius Julianus (Cassius).
Republican form of government is restored. Restoration of the public
rites of the Religio Romana begins."

At that time the contact postal address was in Morrristown, NJ.
Northern New Jersey being where Germanicus lives.

Marcus Cassius and Flavius Vedius were our first Consuls.

As such they co-signed the "Declaratio Nova Roma," dated "II Kal Mar.,
MMDCCLI ab urbe condita (February 28th 1998)"

Patricia Cassia is listed amongst the Magistrates of the time as a
Quaestor, appointed by Senatus Consulta on 6/30/98.

The Senate of the time consisted of the two Consuls, plus Decius
Iunius Palladius and Quintus Caccilius Metellus.

Germanicus was our webmaster and newsletter publisher at the time, also.

Germanicus also has preserved the original Nova Roma Yahoo group,
which one can join to mine the archive, but no new posts are allowed
save by the list owner.

=========================================
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poet

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/

--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40125 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Upcomming Votes and Magistrate Resignations
Gaius Popillius Laenas Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit,

Because of a number of factors, the main one being the resignation
of our Magister Aranearius (webmaster) in August, the call for
voting on two proposals has been delayed. It will now occur in
conjunction with the upcoming annual elections.

The first proposal that will be presented is the Lex Popillia
Senatoria, which has already been through contio and debate.

There is one other item that I have promised action on, and that is
clarification on resignations of magistrates.

This issue arose early this year. I asked for the input of the
Senate, my staff, and my colleague. Basically there are two ways to
approach it: a grace period allowing for reconsideration after a
magistrate announces a resignation, or resignation effectively
immediately.

The majority of the Senate appears to favor effective immediately.
My colleague, Consul Caesar, favors a grace period because he feels
an immediately effective resignation is harsh and may cause us to
lose good magistrates who just experience a period of frustration.

I have decided to present to you for comment, a lex that proposes
immediately effective resignations of magistrates. The lex also
provides, although perhaps superfluously, that a resigning
magistrate who changes his or her mind is free to stand in the
election for a replacement and let the people decide.

This seems to me the best course of action.

I feel Consul Caesar and I have worked very well together this year
and I am pleased to call him a friend. I mean no disrespect to him
in presenting this; it is just that we disagree.

The proposed text follows:



Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
>
> I. A magistrate who resigns his magistracy shall
> immediately and irrevocably cease to hold that
> magistracy.
>
> II. A magistrate who announces his resignation of
> citizenship shall immediately and irrevocably cease
> to hold any and all his magistracies.
>
> III. A magistrate who resigns his magistracy and
> later changes his or her mind, may stand as a candidate
> in the election to fill the vacancy without penalty.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40126 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Salvete omnes,

Thank you Caesar for you post. Re-reading my original post, it does
seem a little harsh. I was feeling protective of Vedius' and his
role, and I could have worded things better or sent a private e-mail.

For that, I apologize to Marcus Cassius.

And you are correct, none of my posts on this issue are to be
considered as from a Consul - just from a cive.

Valete,

Laenas



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
<gn_iulius_caesar@y...> wrote:
>
> Salve Philippe.
>
> Although Laenas didn't answer your post specifically as Consul,
> being both his friend and his Accensus and knowing that he is very
> busy at the moment, I will take the liberty of answering for him
(as
> his friend).
>
> Firstly in our Annals
> (http://novaroma.org/annales/2751/resignat.htm) the entry for 18th
> September 1998 ends thus:
>
> "Although the nation would continue to regret the sudden loss of
its
> co-founder, Flavius Vedius Germanicus, it was now clear that Nova
> Roma had weathered its first crisis intact. The Republic would
live
> on."
>
> Vedius can no doubt be contacted via the web mail feature accessed
> via his entry at:
>
> http://novaroma.org/bin/view/civis?id=27
>
> I think Laenas was trying to ensure that you were made aware of
> Vedius and no doubt to head off, through a public post rather than
> private email, the very possible negative reaction to this
omission.
> I feel certain that Laenas was attempting to ensure that no one
felt
> slighted. It wasn't a slam and neither was he implying even a huge
> possible slight, just "somewhat of a slight".
>
> Vale
> Gnaeus Iulius Caesar
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Sensei Phil Perez"
> <senseiphil@n...> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Laene,
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40127 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: The Census: A Job Well Done
Salve G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana!

Thank You for your kind words!

If You want another look into the work of a Censor and his staff You
may look at my old report for last year at:

http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm

That was a year of reforms of the Censorial routines and new edicta
were issued building a new legal ground for Nova Roma and new
citizens. A new Lex. "LEX DE NOMINIBUS APPROBATIONIBUSQUE" will soon
be presented to the Populus to vote for. That way all that work will
be part of our legislation.

My present Colleague Gnaeus Marinus has continued my work since this
summer, he also got the "Lex Equitia de Familia" through the Comitia
during his Consulship to form the bases for the family legislation.
The work of the Censores during the last two years have been very
important to build a better Res Publica. At least that is my opinion.
;-)

Now the important question is, who is going to succeed me as the
colleague to Gnaeus Marinus during the next year? I know who to vote
for and I will tell the whole Res Publica as soon as I know what
candidates we have. As already has been explained to You, You will
not be forced to vote for the candidate that Caius Minucius Scaevola
mentioned.

>G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Quiritibus SPD.
>
>In the (almost) year that I have been around Nova Roma, and
>in the seven months that I have been a civis, the entire
>census process, and especially the very detailed report by
>C. Fabius Buteo Quintillianus, are the most impressive
>pieces of work that I have seen come through the Main List.
>
>To Censor Fabius and his team, who have invested hundreds
>of hours in making this census possible, magnas gratias ago.
>Each of you sets a fine example for anyone coming into NR.
>
>As others have said, we have at last a clear picture of the
>populus which is the foundation NR's future. To choose the
>architects, every single assidui needs to vote.
>
>Valete bene in pace Deorum
>
>G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFBQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40128 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Response to a question asked to me in private
>
Salve Pontifex Gai Fabi Buteo Modiane,

Thank you for your response to that question. You spent a great deal
of time, effort and reflection in answering. Once again you have done
a terrific job in clarifying your position, equating and comparing the
relio's stands to mainstream religions and in short painting a clear
picture for all of us in NR.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40129 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Many Thanks
Salve Amica!

>Pompeia Minucia Tiberia Quiritibus S.P.D.
>
>First of all, I would like to thank those who have expressed wishes of
>support and endorsement on my behalf; I very much appreciate your
>confidence and I am honoured by your trust.
>
>We have some very good candidates, but I think they deserve a separate
>post with some detailed elaboration on my part, regarding their
>attributes.

You know Pompeia Minucia Tiberia Strabo, Amica that I will be very
happy to see You as a Consul next year. Especially after my work with
the Census I am convinced that we need a person of your calibre and
intelligence to lead Nova Roma! I wish You all the best in the
elections!

When I see that You and Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus are running for
the Consulship I think we might get a very competent pair of Consules
next year and as I know that You both will work well together I am
sure that Nova Roma will grow to be much stronger next year.

>
> Secondly, I wish to extend a public thank you to the Censores and
>their respective Cohortes for their collective hard work in conducting
>this Census. Alot of communication, phone, email, documentation of
>data was involved... And the governors, in the process, were kept
>abreast of what was required of them in their provinciae. And the
>cohors were available for any questions.

Thank You very much! I want to emphasize the work done by Marcus
Moravius Piscinus Horatianus and the Officina Census. I have
mentioned names before and I am still astonished over the luck I have
had in finding such assistants.

>As one who does a certain amount of statistical maintenance, I can
>appreciate their efforts very much at what can be at times a laborious
>and well, 'nitpicky' task.
>
>I am sure the data will be an invaluable tool in the determination of
>the needs of the republic.

Yes and I think that You and Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus will use
this material to guide the Res Publica to even greater deeds next
year. Good Luck!

>Bene valete

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFBQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40130 From: marcushoratius Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Salvete Quinte Pauline et Quirites omnes

While conducting the census, the Officina Census received emails
from some former members. Nearly all of them indicated that
misconduct on Nova Roma lists by certain individuals caused them to
leave. As Censor Marinus posted earlier, former members indicated
that these individuals are certain former magistrates. In addition
to misconduct on the lists, other allegations were made against
former magistrates. Some of the former members identified
individual magistrates by name; one former magistrate in particular
was mentioned in every instance where names were provided. Examples
of some of these allegations were forwarded to Censores Marinus and
Fabius Buteo.

I want to emphasize that the particular problem identified by former
members is one that existed in the past. The results of the census,
and the complaints we received in the Officina Census, do not
reflect on our current magistrates. Steps have been taken this year
to correct the outstanding problem that previously characterized
Nova Roman lists. It should also be emphasized that the complaints
we received came from a sampling of former members, and therefore
the information should be regarded as anecdotal. The information
came from only a few provinciae, nearly half from one provincia
alone, and does not indicate therefore that such problems extended
throughout Nova Roma. We should not, therefore, give undue weight to
this information

Earlier I wrote to the censores to explain that I think that the
information we received may pertain directly to the loss of perhaps
300 cives. It does not fully account for the loss of over three
thousand members that Nova Roma has experienced in the past five
years. However there was some indication of a rippling effect.
This was true more so in certain gentes and provinciae than in
others. Past problems concern us, but no single cause can be
attributed for the loss of 83% of our membership.

Considering that so many have left Nova Roma, I think that Iulius
Sabinus may have been closer to the mark:

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Iulius Sabinus"
<iulius_sabinus@y...> wrote:
>
> Because ( I love statistics ) in every week four - five
> citizens joining to the Forum. Or they don't understand what is
> happen here, or they are disappointed about what is happen, so
that,
> after a time they left the group. I'm not talking about those who
> request the citizenship.
>

There are many things we might say to further illuminate Sabinus'
thought. New members did not find what they expected to find in
Nova Roma. Squabbles that occurred in the past directly inhibited
Nova Roma's ability to become an educational organization. They
were surprised by what they did find, and certainly they would not
have understood the internal squabbles they witnessed. In some
cases the acerbic nature of confrontations on the lists directly led
to members leaving. I do not think we should dwell on what
happened in the past. Further disputes and finger pointing is not
going to improve Nova Roma but will contribute to continuing the
problems we have had. Rather we should focus ourselves on meeting
the expectations of members in building the future of Nova Roma.

Valete et vade in pace Deorum

M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
Scriba Censoris Census Primus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40131 From: Marcus Iulius Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Candidate as Queastor
avete Cives Novae Romae

I come to you and submit my candidacy for the position of Quaestor.

I'm 37 years old and I've been a civis for almost 4 years; here a summary
of what I have done in Nova Roma so far:

2755 Scriba Propraetoris Provinciae Italiae
Member of the Magna Mater Project Staff

2756 Scriba Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Propraetoris Provinciae Italiae
Member of the Magna Mater Project Staff

2757 Aedilis Curulis
Vicarius Provinciae Italiae
Aedilis Urbis Pro Tempore
Chief of the Magna Mater Project Staff

2758 Praetor
Vicarius Provinciae Italiae
Aedilis Urbis

Those interested in a more detailed description of my past work will
find it at:

http://www.geocities.com/m_iulius/

Also, I am a member of the new "Libra" Alliance:

http://www.fraelovdesign.it/libra


My Cursus Hororum won't be completed if I miss the position of Quaestor, an office I've skipped before.... It's time to fill the gap! I promise to serve with the same dedication I have EVER given to NR.

Thank you


Valete optime




M·IVL·PERVSIANVS
------------------------------
Senator et Praetor Novae Romae·Vicarius
Propraetoris Italiae·Aedilis Urbis·
-----------------------------------------
http://www.geocities.com/m_iulius
http://italia.novaroma.org/signaromanorum
http://italia.novaroma.org/nri/index.htm
------------------------------------------------
SEMPER AD LATVS·TERRAS PERMVLCES·COMITARIS VITAS

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40132 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Response to a question asked to me in private
A. Apollonius C. Buteoni sal.

Let me say in your support that I find this an
entirely Roman position, and a reasonable one. Each
Roman cult had, and has, its own constituency. The
public cults - the ones which are supervised by the
pontifices, the flamines, and so on - are cults which
exist to mediate between the gods on the one hand and
the populus Romanus on the other. These cults exist
solely and exclusively for the benefit of the populus
Romanus.

That isn't to say that the Roman gods don't care about
people who are not Roman citizens - on the contrary,
it is a fairly basic Roman assumption that the gods
will tend to look after anyone who worships them. The
fact that they don't worry too much about people who
don't worship them may seem a bit exclusive, but it is
not as exclusive as the monotheistic religions which
your questioner mentions. The difference is that
Juppiter will look after anyone who worships him in
the proper way regardless of what other gods that
person worships. That sounds like a pretty open-minded
god to me.

Nor does it mean that the gods will necessarily refuse
to look after people who don't worship them, or will
go out of their way to strike them down. I can see no
reason why, if a person who dutifully worships
Juppiter should ask him to help someone else, Juppiter
would not be inclined to do so. But, again, it would
not be the job of a priest in a public cult of the
populus Romanus to ask the gods to intercede on behalf
of non-citizens. In fact it would be quite improper
for a public priest on his own initiative to use
public resources for that purpose (and let's remember
that a pontificate or a flaminate is a public resource
just as much as the money in the treasury is): he
would be exceeding his mandate. It would be like a
consul taking money from the treasury and, without any
authorization to do so, donating it to Amnesty
International. Very noble, we might say, very
admirable, if he had done it with his own money, or if
he had had authority to spend public money on it, but
in the absence of that authority it's plain
embezzlement.

Now, it is a very different matter if a public priest,
whose job is to intercede with the gods on behalf of
the populus, has a mandate from the populus which
includes instructions to ask the gods to help
non-citizens. There's nothing impossible about that,
but the mandate must come from the populus, not from
the initiative of the individual priest. It would, as
far as I'm aware, be a significant divergence from
ancient religious practice: I know of no historical
example of public sacrifices or prayers being offered
on behalf of no-citizens. But it's not beyond the
realms of possibility. Nonetheless, it would be a
significant innovation and not one to be made on a
whim by an individual public servant.

None of this is inhumane or uncharitable, it is just a
matter of observing the proper boundaries between
public and private, citizen and non-citizen.



___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Model Search 2005 - Find the next catwalk superstars - http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/model-search/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40133 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
Salve Consuls

The Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando as written below is in keeping with the Nova Roma Constitution and I strongly support its adoption. I want to thank Consul Gaius Popillius Laenas for proposing this Lex. I would also like to say while I disagree with Consul Francis Apulus Caesar view that there should be a grace period I greatly respect his right to disagree and and his willingness to allow the voters to decide this issue once and for all.

Thank You Consuls of Nova Roma!


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus



Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando

I. A magistrate who resigns his magistracy shall
immediately and irrevocably cease to hold that
magistracy.

II. A magistrate who announces his resignation of
citizenship shall immediately and irrevocably cease
to hold any and all his magistracies.

III. A magistrate who resigns his magistracy and
later changes his or her mind, may stand as a candidate
in the election to fill the vacancy without penalty.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40134 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Salvete M Moravi Piscine Horatiane et omnes,

First of all I want to thank the Censors, you and congratulate all
those involved in the Census. The work has been just phenmomenal and
we now have a clear picture of where we stand.

I just wanted to add a few points to your observations which could
be food for thought.

1) I think every organization in the world has conflicting
personalities, quarrels, back stabbing finger pointing, back bench
critics and the lot. I know the real academic world is no better.
I have had many friends and neigbours over the years who were part
of those academic institutions and have a pretty good idea of what
goes on. I am sure Republican Rome was just the same and it would be
very hard if not impossible to eliminate these problems.

2) I have been wining and dining quite a number of people here in
Edmonton trying to get them into Rome and NR. Unfortunately they do
not have that intial life long spark or interest in Rome in their
blood and perhaps got a quick fleeting interest after seeing a movie
like Gladiator or HBO's Roma. They see what we do and what is
required but they say they are tied up with busy scheduals, family
and time free might be better spent at the golf course or travelling.
Well at least they are honest and save our censors and scribes lots
of paper work for nothing. Perhaps hard core Roman enthusiasts are
one in a thousand.

3) It seems to me that one has to be quite self motivated in this
organization. You must ask questions, volunteer yourself and try
finding your own mentors. I think what we could all do better is
have a definte plan and schedual layed out for new people with
respect to their duties. For example I remember getting off on the
right foot with Manius Constantius as his scribe. Instead of saying,
to assist my office and leaving it at that he said, Quintus this
week I need: 1) A contact list of all Roman websites in North
Africa, 2) Next week a brief summary Of African Roman cities 3) This
week contact so and so for affiliations, links etc. All in all I was
perfectly clear in what I had to do and carried on.

4) As one of my provincial members pointed out to me this morning,
we really have to get going with face to face meetings and real
world activities. NR Europe has been doing that but they have what
you call good transit systems for getting around cheaper and there
seems to be a better concentration of citizens in each city and
province than North America. Unfortunately a few have pointed out to
me that "virtual" means just that; doesn't really exist and in North
America it may be harder to keep citizens by just operating in
cyberspace.

Anyway, these are just a few of my thoughts and observations. This
Census certainly gives us a great deal to think about and see what
must be done.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus











--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@s...>
wrote:
>
> Salvete Quinte Pauline et Quirites omnes
>
> While conducting the census, the Officina Census received emails
> from some former members. Nearly all of them indicated that
> misconduct on Nova Roma lists by certain individuals caused them
to
> leave. As Censor Marinus posted earlier, former members indicated
> that these individuals are certain former magistrates. In
addition
> to misconduct on the lists, other allegations were made against
> former magistrates. Some of the former members identified
> individual magistrates by name; one former magistrate in
particular
> was mentioned in every instance where names were provided.
Examples
> of some of these allegations were forwarded to Censores Marinus
and
> Fabius Buteo.
>
> I want to emphasize that the particular problem identified by
former
> members is one that existed in the past. The results of the
census,
> and the complaints we received in the Officina Census, do not
> reflect on our current magistrates. Steps have been taken this
year
> to correct the outstanding problem that previously characterized
> Nova Roman lists. It should also be emphasized that the
complaints
> we received came from a sampling of former members, and therefore
> the information should be regarded as anecdotal. The information
> came from only a few provinciae, nearly half from one provincia
> alone, and does not indicate therefore that such problems extended
> throughout Nova Roma. We should not, therefore, give undue weight
to
> this information
>
> Earlier I wrote to the censores to explain that I think that the
> information we received may pertain directly to the loss of
perhaps
> 300 cives. It does not fully account for the loss of over three
> thousand members that Nova Roma has experienced in the past five
> years. However there was some indication of a rippling effect.
> This was true more so in certain gentes and provinciae than in
> others. Past problems concern us, but no single cause can be
> attributed for the loss of 83% of our membership.
>
> Considering that so many have left Nova Roma, I think that Iulius
> Sabinus may have been closer to the mark:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Iulius Sabinus"
> <iulius_sabinus@y...> wrote:
> >
> > Because ( I love statistics ) in every week four - five
> > citizens joining to the Forum. Or they don't understand what is
> > happen here, or they are disappointed about what is happen, so
> that,
> > after a time they left the group. I'm not talking about those
who
> > request the citizenship.
> >
>
> There are many things we might say to further illuminate Sabinus'
> thought. New members did not find what they expected to find in
> Nova Roma. Squabbles that occurred in the past directly inhibited
> Nova Roma's ability to become an educational organization. They
> were surprised by what they did find, and certainly they would not
> have understood the internal squabbles they witnessed. In some
> cases the acerbic nature of confrontations on the lists directly
led
> to members leaving. I do not think we should dwell on what
> happened in the past. Further disputes and finger pointing is not
> going to improve Nova Roma but will contribute to continuing the
> problems we have had. Rather we should focus ourselves on meeting
> the expectations of members in building the future of Nova Roma.
>
> Valete et vade in pace Deorum
>
> M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
> Scriba Censoris Census Primus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40135 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
Salvete, omnes -

On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:57:28PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Salve Consuls
>
> The Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando as written below is in keeping
> with the Nova Roma Constitution and I strongly support its adoption.
> I want to thank Consul Gaius Popillius Laenas for proposing this Lex.
> I would also like to say while I disagree with Consul Francis Apulus
> Caesar view that there should be a grace period I greatly respect his
> right to disagree and and his willingness to allow the voters to
> decide this issue once and for all.

As I understand it, F. Apulus Caesar is currently undergoing medical
treatment, and has limited communication options. Personally - and I
speak only as a private citizen here - I would feel much more
comfortable if _he_ were to post his viewpoint here, instead of us
having to _assume_ what that viewpoint is.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tamdiu discendum est, quamdiu vivas.
We should learn as long as we may live. (We live and learn.)
-- Seneca Philosophus, "Epistulae"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40136 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Nova Nova Roman Flags
Put me down for two flags. I will dislay one beside
the Union Jack, Austrailian and American flags in our
muster room. It will add bravado to my police district
if that is okay with you and no one here is offended.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <kreick@...>
wrote:
> Salve Tiberius Galerius Paulinus~
>
> Please put me down for 1 2-sided flag as well, if
you please.
>
> Quintus Moravius Severus
>
>
>
> On 12/1/05, STEPHEN GALLAGHER <spqr1947@...>
wrote:
> >
> > Salve Decimus Gladius Lupus
> >
> > You are the first person who has shown any
interest in the flag. If I get
> > more interest I will order some. I will keep a
list of those who are
> > interested and announce when you can order some.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Vale
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From:
DecimusGladiusLupus<mailto:hicksvillebozo@...>
> > To:
Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 6:04 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Nova Nova Roman Flags
> >
> >
> > Salve Paulinus,
> > I would be very
interested in ordering one of
> > the double sided flags if there are any available.
> > Vale; Decimus
Gladius Lupus.
> >
> > "Timothy P. Gallagher"
<spqr753@...<mailto:spqr753@...>> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Romans
> >
> >
> > I am in the process of ordering new Nova Roma
flags that will be for
> > sale to anybody who would like them.
> > The Flags will be like a modern national flag 3'
by 5'. The will come
> > in two styles, one sided, which means one side
will be backward and two
> > sided meaning that it will read right on both
sides. I would like to get an
> > idea of how may flags to order.
> >
> > The cost of a one sided 3' by 5' flag will be
about 40.00 each plus
> > postage
> >
> > The cost of a two sided 3' by 5' flag will be
about 65.00 each plus
> > postage
> >
> > 10% ( $4 or $6.50 ) will go to the Nova Roma
Treasury for each flag
> > sold.
> >
> > Once the order has been placed it will be about
4 week to make the flags
> > and for me to get them and start sending them
out.
> >
> >
> > Vale
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > Ordo equester
> > Proprietor The Galerius Shop
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> >
> > Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40137 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
Salvete Omnes,

I fully agree with Caius Minucius. Although Caesar and I have
discussed this, he may have changed his mind on the issue. I posted
the part about our past disagreement solely out of respect for him.
I have also written privately to him to inform him of my
intentions. I do not wish him to think I am trying to "spring"
something on him.

If Consul Caesar IS of a differing mind, he will probably make his
own proposal, and the cives can choose the one they prefer much as
the would between two candidates for office.

Valete,

Laenas

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Benjamin A. Okopnik" <ben@l...>
wrote:
>
> Salvete, omnes -
>
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:57:28PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Salve Consuls
> >
> > The Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando as written below is in
keeping
> > with the Nova Roma Constitution and I strongly support its
adoption.
> > I want to thank Consul Gaius Popillius Laenas for proposing this
Lex.
> > I would also like to say while I disagree with Consul Francis
Apulus
> > Caesar view that there should be a grace period I greatly
respect his
> > right to disagree and and his willingness to allow the voters to
> > decide this issue once and for all.
>
> As I understand it, F. Apulus Caesar is currently undergoing
medical
> treatment, and has limited communication options. Personally - and
I
> speak only as a private citizen here - I would feel much more
> comfortable if _he_ were to post his viewpoint here, instead of us
> having to _assume_ what that viewpoint is.
>
>
> Valete,
> Caius Minucius Scaevola
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-
> Tamdiu discendum est, quamdiu vivas.
> We should learn as long as we may live. (We live and learn.)
> -- Seneca Philosophus, "Epistulae"
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40138 From: Marcus Arminius Maior Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Candidacy for Tribunus Plebis
Salvete


I, Marcus Arminius Maior, declare that i am candidate for the office
of Tribunus Plebis of Nova Roma.


Valete
Marcus Arminius Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40139 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: A Plea to the Quirites
F. Galerius Aurelianus flamen Cerealis L. Cassio Cornuto. Salve.

You have chosen the proper focus for your interest in Nova Roma. The Religio Romana is at the very foundation of what our organization is all about. Politics is more in the nature of an addendum to what the founders of Nova Roma and, like any political entity, has grown to far greater proportions than is necessary for an organization such as ours; in my opinion.
As a citizen who is interested in the Religio Romana, you should practice the private rites as often as you can and become familar with the structure of religious caerimoniae and fasti. Please feel free to contact members of the Sacred Colleges about good books to study and correspond with them. I especially recommend L. Equitius Cinncinatus Augur, G. Fabius Buteo Modianus, and Iulius Scaurus as three of the pre-eminent practitioners of the Religio along with our Pontifex Maximus.
Should you be interested in the political aspect of our young Republic, I would suggest that you study the public platforms of those magistrates currently in office or the candidates who are running for office to see if there are any who you feel share your interests and views. Contact them privately off-list and offer them your services. I did much the same when I was new and was offered to work in the consular cohort of one of our most esteemed public figures.
However you decided to proceed, may the Goddess of the Plebs grant you bountiful blessings and full harvests. Vale.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Sciarappa <obiwan6797@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:49:44 -0500
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] A Plea to the Quirites


Salvete omnes,

My name is Lucius Cassius Cornutus.
I have only been a citizen since 7/27/05.....
My focus is Roman paganism, and I know
little of politics. As I understand it one has
to be a citizen for more than six months
to run. What can I do to help Nova Roma
at this stage in my citizenship?

PAX DEORUM

Lucius Cassius Cornutus







On Dec 1, 2005, at 10:02 AM, Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix wrote:

> C. Minucius Hadrianus Felix Quiritibus S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> I am writing this as a plea to the Quirites of Nova Roma for noble
> citizens to step forward and run for elected office in the upcoming
> election.
>
> We still have many critical offices that have insufficient candidates
> or
> none at all:
>
> We still need one Plebian Aedile.
>
> We still need four Tribune of the Plebs.
>
> We still need three Quaestors.
>
> We still need an Editor Commentariorum.
>
> We still need four Diribitores.
>
> We still need three Rogatores.
>
> We still need one Custodes.
>
> There are only two more days for candidates to submit their intentions
> to run for office - the deadline is December 3rd, 8 p.m. Roma time, so
> time is running out.
>
> Citizens of Nova Roma, our Res Publica cannot function without an
> elected government. We have 1521 registered citizens as of today and
> yet
> we are still in danger of not even being able to field sufficient
> candidates to fill the 18 remaining magisterial openings - and that is
> to merely fill the spaces and leave us with uncontested elections in
> many cases. Public service is the keystone of the Roman and Nova Roman
> ideal. I realize many of you out there are saying to yourself "I'm too
> new" or "I don't really know enough" and are afraid you may not be up
> to
> the task. Trust me - and I'm speaking from experience - the best way
> to
> learn is to jump right in. It may be a bit overwhelming at first, but
> you'll be amazed at how quickly you adjust. Many of these open offices
> are fairly simple and do not involve a huge investment in time, and
> they
> are an excellent way for a new citizen to get involved, learn how Nova
> Roma works, and start your path on that most Roman of endeavors -
> civic
> service. We cannot have elections without Diribitores. The Plebs of
> Nova
> Roma will lack a voice without Tribunes. We will have no newsletter
> without an Editor Commentariorum. I implore you, citizens of Nova
> Roma,
> step up to the plate for your Res Publica. Don't sit and wait for
> someone else to do it, or it may never get done.
>
> Valete Bene,
>
> --
> Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix
> Pontifex et Minervae Aedis Sacerdos Legate Massachusetts Regio
> c.minucius.hadrianus@...
>
> "We are all, so far as we inherit the civilization of Europe,
> still citizens of the Roman Empire, and time as not yet proved
> Virgil wrong when he wrote /nec tempora pono: imperium sine fine
> dedi./"
>
> -T.S. Eliot
>
> "/His ego nec metas rerum nec tempora pono: imperium sine fine dedi./"
>
> "For the achievement of these people I fix neither spatial boundaries
> or
> temporal limits: I have given them empire without end."
>
> -Virgil, /Aeneid/ I.278,279
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Ancient history
> Fall of the roman empire
> The fall of the roman empire
> Roman empire
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> ? Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> ? To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> ? Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Yahoo! Groups Links






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40140 From: Chuck Young Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
I am new to your group, however, I am not new to living history and organizations like this.

I have seen groups come and go, sometimes inexplicably, for over 34 years. I feel it is a trend, or flow, of hobbies everywhere. You can see it in American Civil War reenacting. People are fleeing it to other periods.

If, like you say, you have lost 83% of your membership, what plans are there to regain them, or to find new people? There will always be good folks out there who want to be a part of a group like this. What are you, as the beaurocrats major of this organization, going to do to find them and convince them to become members?

I joined because of the religious and historic components of the group. I have long been a follower of the historic Mars and Mythrus religions, and I find on your site that is a componant of your group philosophy. I also reenact Roman Auxilia and have a group started to do the same. We are interested in the same goals as you are: education and recreation of ancient civilizations. I'm a soldier, and my place in life is in service of my group.

I have one suggestion for the group. Start a political only forum so that discussions in the future that may be considered alienating to the general populus can be worked out in private. Leave the regular forum to subjects germain to everyman, rather than the politicos. if announcements need to be made to the mob, that's great, but, the political fighting should be left to a different playground. I know many political types wouldn't like that. They thrive on strife, however, most of the folks just want the bread and circuses.

Gaius Aurelius Scipio
Cohors II Asturum Equitata

marcushoratius <mhoratius@...> wrote:
Salvete Quinte Pauline et Quirites omnes

While conducting the census, the Officina Census received emails
from some former members. Nearly all of them indicated that
misconduct on Nova Roma lists by certain individuals caused them to
leave. As Censor Marinus posted earlier, former members indicated
that these individuals are certain former magistrates. In addition
to misconduct on the lists, other allegations were made against
former magistrates. Some of the former members identified
individual magistrates by name; one former magistrate in particular
was mentioned in every instance where names were provided. Examples
of some of these allegations were forwarded to Censores Marinus and
Fabius Buteo.

I want to emphasize that the particular problem identified by former
members is one that existed in the past. The results of the census,
and the complaints we received in the Officina Census, do not
reflect on our current magistrates. Steps have been taken this year
to correct the outstanding problem that previously characterized
Nova Roman lists. It should also be emphasized that the complaints
we received came from a sampling of former members, and therefore
the information should be regarded as anecdotal. The information
came from only a few provinciae, nearly half from one provincia
alone, and does not indicate therefore that such problems extended
throughout Nova Roma. We should not, therefore, give undue weight to
this information

Earlier I wrote to the censores to explain that I think that the
information we received may pertain directly to the loss of perhaps
300 cives. It does not fully account for the loss of over three
thousand members that Nova Roma has experienced in the past five
years. However there was some indication of a rippling effect.
This was true more so in certain gentes and provinciae than in
others. Past problems concern us, but no single cause can be
attributed for the loss of 83% of our membership.

Considering that so many have left Nova Roma, I think that Iulius
Sabinus may have been closer to the mark:

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Iulius Sabinus"
<iulius_sabinus@y...> wrote:
>
> Because ( I love statistics ) in every week four - five
> citizens joining to the Forum. Or they don't understand what is
> happen here, or they are disappointed about what is happen, so
that,
> after a time they left the group. I'm not talking about those who
> request the citizenship.
>

There are many things we might say to further illuminate Sabinus'
thought. New members did not find what they expected to find in
Nova Roma. Squabbles that occurred in the past directly inhibited
Nova Roma's ability to become an educational organization. They
were surprised by what they did find, and certainly they would not
have understood the internal squabbles they witnessed. In some
cases the acerbic nature of confrontations on the lists directly led
to members leaving. I do not think we should dwell on what
happened in the past. Further disputes and finger pointing is not
going to improve Nova Roma but will contribute to continuing the
problems we have had. Rather we should focus ourselves on meeting
the expectations of members in building the future of Nova Roma.

Valete et vade in pace Deorum

M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
Scriba Censoris Census Primus






SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire Roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





Quondo Omni Flunkus Mortati. (When all else fails, play dead!)
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum. (If you want peace, prepare for war)(Vegetius)
'Veni, Vidi, Castratavi Illegitimos' - we came, we saw, we castrated the b*stards...
"So I had a choice: either take the word of a madman, take the word of a man who had used weapons of mass destruction on his own people, or take action to defend America. Given that choice, I will defend America every time." --President George W. Bush
-The Darwin Award candidate-
Iraqi terrorist Khay Rahnajet didn't pay enough postage on a letter bomb. It came back with "Return to Sender" stamped on it. Forgetting it was the bomb, he opened it and was blown to bits.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40141 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
SALVE, have you subscribed to the sodalitas militarium
list? They are a integral part of Nova Roma and are
currently looking for a praefect of Roman auxilia.
Your services might be useful there. BTW, welcome.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <openseasprod@...>
wrote:
> I am new to your group, however, I am not new to
living history and organizations like this.
>
> I have seen groups come and go, sometimes
inexplicably, for over 34 years. I feel it is a trend,
or flow, of hobbies everywhere. You can see it in
American Civil War reenacting. People are fleeing it
to other periods.
>
> If, like you say, you have lost 83% of your
membership, what plans are there to regain them, or to
find new people? There will always be good folks out
there who want to be a part of a group like this. What
are you, as the beaurocrats major of this
organization, going to do to find them and convince
them to become members?
>
> I joined because of the religious and historic
components of the group. I have long been a follower
of the historic Mars and Mythrus religions, and I find
on your site that is a componant of your group
philosophy. I also reenact Roman Auxilia and have a
group started to do the same. We are interested in the
same goals as you are: education and recreation of
ancient civilizations. I'm a soldier, and my place in
life is in service of my group.
>
> I have one suggestion for the group. Start a
political only forum so that discussions in the future
that may be considered alienating to the general
populus can be worked out in private. Leave the
regular forum to subjects germain to everyman, rather
than the politicos. if announcements need to be made
to the mob, that's great, but, the political fighting
should be left to a different playground. I know many
political types wouldn't like that. They thrive on
strife, however, most of the folks just want the bread
and circuses.
>
> Gaius Aurelius Scipio
> Cohors II Asturum Equitata
>
> marcushoratius <mhoratius@...> wrote:
> Salvete Quinte Pauline et Quirites omnes
>
> While conducting the census, the Officina Census
received emails
> from some former members. Nearly all of them
indicated that
> misconduct on Nova Roma lists by certain individuals
caused them to
> leave. As Censor Marinus posted earlier, former
members indicated
> that these individuals are certain former
magistrates. In addition
> to misconduct on the lists, other allegations were
made against
> former magistrates. Some of the former members
identified
> individual magistrates by name; one former
magistrate in particular
> was mentioned in every instance where names were
provided. Examples
> of some of these allegations were forwarded to
Censores Marinus and
> Fabius Buteo.
>
> I want to emphasize that the particular problem
identified by former
> members is one that existed in the past. The
results of the census,
> and the complaints we received in the Officina
Census, do not
> reflect on our current magistrates. Steps have been
taken this year
> to correct the outstanding problem that previously
characterized
> Nova Roman lists. It should also be emphasized that
the complaints
> we received came from a sampling of former members,
and therefore
> the information should be regarded as anecdotal.
The information
> came from only a few provinciae, nearly half from
one provincia
> alone, and does not indicate therefore that such
problems extended
> throughout Nova Roma. We should not, therefore, give
undue weight to
> this information
>
> Earlier I wrote to the censores to explain that I
think that the
> information we received may pertain directly to the
loss of perhaps
> 300 cives. It does not fully account for the loss
of over three
> thousand members that Nova Roma has experienced in
the past five
> years. However there was some indication of a
rippling effect.
> This was true more so in certain gentes and
provinciae than in
> others. Past problems concern us, but no single
cause can be
> attributed for the loss of 83% of our membership.
>
> Considering that so many have left Nova Roma, I
think that Iulius
> Sabinus may have been closer to the mark:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Iulius
Sabinus"
> <iulius_sabinus@y...> wrote:
> >
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40142 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
C. Equitius Cato Q. Popillio Laeno quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve consul et salvete omnes.

First I would like to applaud the consul for placing before the People
something to at least debate.

I would like to comment (I know, big surprise) on the body of the
proposed law. As it is well known, I am in favor of the immediate
effect of a resignation; the proposed law, however, does not take into
consideration the law which currently exists. To create a clear law
in which magistracies are resigned immediately, without the "grace
period" afforded resignation of citizenship, I would suggest something
rather like this:


"LEX POPILLIA DE MAGISTRATU EIRUANDO

The lex Cornelia et Maria de civitate eiuranda is amended by addition
as follows:

III. If a currently serving magistrate resigns from his office(s) or
his citizenship, either separately or concurrently, he will be
considered to have vacated any office(s) he may hold upon the
publication of his resignation. He may still resume his citizenship
in accordance to Section II of this law (within the nundina allowed);
his office, being vacated, will remain so until the magistrate
empowered to do so by law can call for an election to fill said
vacancy as prescribed by law."


Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40143 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: The Upcoming Elections
Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit.

Rempublicam Di servent.

I come before you now, Citizens, not to offer my endorsements, or to
announce my candidacy for any office, nor to remind you of your duty as
citizens to cast your votes during the elections, however much I may, as
you know, like to do all of the above. Today, rather, I come before you
to ask you, and to prevail upon you, to offer yourselves as candidates
for office.

To date, so far as I am aware, we are yet still in need of a candidate
for the plebeian offices, Aedilis Plebis and Tribunus Plebis. Aside
that, we need also candidates for the "lesser" offices: 3 Diribitores
are needed, 1 Custos, and 1 Editor Commentariorum. I think, as much as
many, I am aware of the lack of pomp and glory there is to be gained in
these offices. There are no lictors for these offices, nor a bench and
purple-bordered toga; no massive amounts of century points, nor even a
seat in the Senate, or the right to pronounce intercessio. But there is
one thing that comes from service in this office, which can not, by
anyone, be removed from the office. In serving in these positions,
there is the honor, and the dignity, of serving the Respublica, and of
completing what many surely know to be the epitome of hard, tedious work.

There are a few who have taken upon these tasks; some of whom are no
longer with us, others who are now seeking higher offices. Shall we
now, by not even paying our previous magistrates the respect of offering
successors to them, send the message that their previous work has been
meaningless?

Without Diribitores, I ask you, who will count the votes? Without
Custodes, who will verify the counts, and announce them to the presiding
magistrates? In fact, without these two offices, how can new
magistrates, from the lowest ranks to the highest, be elected? Even
more, without Aediles Plebis, who will ensure that our plebeian
heritage, the worship of our Mother Ceres, will continue? Consider
these things, I ask you, and you will find that indeed our officers are
necessary.

Citizens, I am sure you have busy schedules. Some of us are working
twenty-two hours per day. Many of us have families for which we have
duties there. But consider this one last thing, Quirites. If not for
the Respublica, if not for the Dream that was Rome, why are we here?

Pro Senatu, Pro Populo, Pro Roma.

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus,
Civis Novae Romae
Pontifex
Fetialis
Diribitor
Legatus Provinciae Lacuum Magnorum
Scriba Censoris
Scriba Interpretis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40144 From: Tribune Albucius Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Petitio tribunatus P. Memmi Albucii
P. Memmius Albucius Plebiis Quiritibusque s.d.

In candida toga an after mature consideration, I have the honor, dear
Plebeii, to present you my humble candidacy for the tribunate in
MMDCCLVIIII a.u.c. (2006 c.e.).

I have been one of your five tribunes of the plebs this year, in 2758
a.u.c..

Why a second candidacy ?

My first motivation is to listen to several of you, Plebeii, and to
some Hon. Patricii, too, who have recently asked me to reconsider my
initial decision not to run for office this year. This consideration
has been backed up by the state that we have all made recently :
there are not enough candidates for our plebeian offices.

So I decide to tell you that I was ready to run for a new annual
mandate in the Tribunate.

Why the Tribunate ?

First because I think that there are currently some experienced cives
who have good skills for Aedilitas plebis, and for our other non-
strictly-plebeian magistracies.

Then, because I think that I would, if elected, have good working
relations with current tribune candidates, Hon. Vipsanius Agrippa,
who has usefully assisted me this year and must be daily thanked to
have involved himself in our NR goods, with Hon. Suetonius Paulinus,
whose each intervention is clear and clever, and with former consul
Astur, whose work in « real life events » in Hispania is an example
for us all, and former Tribune Arminius, whose contribution for Nova
Roma has been decisive.

Third, because I think that we need that some our offices be occupied
by citizens who have no political affiliation and no other obligation
except to serve our State and to honor our Gods.

At last, in our situation of a lack of candidates, I think that my
experience and my skills of lawyer (I do apologize again for
them... ;-) ) may be useful to our Res publica.

Concerning this experience, my objective has been, during my office
this year, to keep close to the mandate that you, the Plebs of Nova
Roma, has given me when You made me the honor to elect me last year.

This mandate was to fulfill the whole obligations and rights that the
constitution and the laws of Nova Roma give to the tribunes of the
plebs.

I have thus tried to develop a « legal », non political, conception
of the duty of the Tribune of the Plebs.

The tribunate must be open to a daily collaboration with the other
constitutional powers and, at the same time, be firm on the respect
of our leges by all, specially by our magistrates. One thing is to
make our laws change, another to respect, first, our current
legislation. This one is our true novaroman contract, and the way we
believe and practice roman values.

I used this year the tribunician right of intercessio each time that
I considered, in full conscience, that law has not been respected,
even for actions which would have had, once legally presented, my
full support. Debates have occurred, and they have been useful for
our democracy, whatever their conclusion.

I have thus worked, last summer, with Hon. Consul Caesar on the
application of our legislation on tax paying, which allowed the
consulate to register, after real efforts, the payment of our annual
contribution by some of our illustrious magistrates (our laws forbid
a citizen to be in office if his/her tax is not paid).

Though I have backed the return of resigning Saturninus in office, I
have then defended the right of a citizen to have his/her case heard
by the comitia plebis tributa when he considered that his
constitutional rights were not respected by the decision of a
tribune. I then underlined that any tribune had the right to speak on
behalf of the comitia, which is the Plebs itself. In order to try to
build an appropriate legal frame, I then proposed last august a lex «
de provocatione ».

I have intervened in some various fields, as the proceedings of
adoption, to have our law respected.

I have assumed the current tasks of a tribune, as to answer the
questions of the Plebeians, to organise the sessions of the comitia
plebis tributa, or to report the sessions of the Senate.

At last, as a Tribune and as Legatus Galliae representing Hon.
Propraetor Apollonius Scipio, I have, in August, attended the
european conventus which gave me the chance to meet wonderful people
(they will all recognize theirselves).

I have expressed, in our main list, my opinions on some of the key
questions that we faced this year 2758, and which will arise again in
2759 : the constitution, the resignation, the right of provocatio,
the tax paying obligation, etc.. I ask each of you, Plebeii
Quiritesque, to have a look of these posts in our ML. And, naturally,
to ask me for further questions if necessary.

I have tried, at last, to keep some reserve in the main list, for
magistrates must not, in my humble opinion, use our forum to express
daily their point of view.

Concerning my current situation of Tribune, I will carry on my duties
for 2758 a.u.c. till Dec. 31, unless my candidacy might interfere
with my obligations. In this last and sole case, I would let my
colleagues tribunes represent our tribunate.

Sincerely yours, Plebeii Quiritesque,


P. Memmius Albucius
Candidatus tribunicius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40145 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Candidates for Censor
In a message dated 12/2/2005 3:06:58 AM Pacific Standard Time,
tau.athanasios@... writes:
Now if someone could tell me--is there a God of Democratic Process? If there
is, some invocations are due, not only for the office of Censor, but for
other offices needing candidates.
There is none mentioned that I can remember, however since each candidate
puts his
fate in the lot, I would say For Fortuna whose festival is celebrated on May
25 & June 24.

Since Censor is a two year position the people are electing ONE censor this
year.
It alternates so that position is always filled. At one point in NR history,
the government
functioned on one Censor, for several months, before another could be elected
as replacement.

Q. Fabius Maximus



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40146 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Declaration of Candidacy
Salvete omnes,

I, Marcus Cassius Philippus step up to the Rostra in my white Toga Candita to declare my candidacy for the office of Quaestor. I currently serve Nova Roma as the Legatus of Regio Maine in Nova Britannia and as a miles in Legio III Cyrenaica. I have been a citizen since 2003 / 08 / 25 and I am Assidui. You can access more information about my citizenship at the Civis page: http://www.novaroma.org/bin/view/civis?id=6379

I am active in the Soldalitas Militarium and I am currently a beginning Latin student of Aula Tullia Scholastica in the Thules Academy. I helped Marcus Cassius Iulianus organize last year's Roman Market Days Festival in Wells Maine as well as hosted the first and second annual Toga Parties at my home. This will remain as an annual event for re-enactors coming up to the Festival every summer. I currently re-enact a 1st Century A.D. Roman Heavy Infantry Legionnaire and I am working on my Thracian Gladiator kit for next season. I made my gladiatorial devue last summer with the Ludus Magnus and it was a heck of a lot of fun.

I am currently involved in the interview of Marcus Cassius Iulianus, one of the founders of Nova Roma and I hope to have the interview broadcast on Nova Roma Radio before the end of the year as well as have the transcript published in Nova Roma's 'Aquila' Newsletter edited by Proconsul Marcus Audens. I have set aside part of my business' webpage for Nova Roman citizen and re-enactment recruiting purposes.

I am not a practitioner of the Religio. I am a follower of Ieshua bar Ioseph, called the Christ. I also have the deepest respect for the Religio and its practitioners as well as all other faiths. In short, I am trustworthy, honest and steadfast in my dealings with others. As you may already know from my previous postings: I pull no punches in communicating my opinions and thoughts, I do not mince my words and you will know precisely where I stand on any given issue if asked (and sometimes even when not ;-). I am not a politician, I am a leader and a team player and most of all an educator. I am declaring this candidacy not because I desire the job but because I have been told that Nova Roma needs me in it. I am here to serve you as best as I can. I will appreciate your support and your vote and will not let you down if you give it to me.

In the macro world I have been practicing martial arts since 1966 and have been running a martial arts academy since 1986 teaching Okinawan Shorinryu Karatejutsu and Yang Style Taijiquan (Tai Chi). I have also been practicing acupressure shiatsu and swedish massage since 1988. Before moving to Maine I lived in New York City and worked as an art director in some of the world's top advertising agencies. One of my graphic designs is still being broadcast: The NBC Logo, and the Tagline/Jingle "Proud as a Peacock" which I designed and wrote back in 1978. I am a college graduate with a Bachelor of Arts Degree from the State University of New York at Stony Brook. I am also a husband to a wonderful wife who puts up with my Roman obsession (and occasionally re-enacts) and two great young daughters who also re-enact with me. You can access more information about me and my macroworld 'bio' at www.northerncrane.net

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40147 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
Salve Laenas,

My apologies to you sir. It has not been one of my better days and I obviously over-reacted to your post. Nova Roma's website is, as you know quite extensive and I have a habit of absorbing only what I need to know. Many things have escaped me (obviously). Cassius is an easy interview for me since he lives (literally) right down the road from me. Vedius lives, from what I understand in New Jersey. Perhaps someone closer to him can perform this task and both interviews can appear either simultaneously or one at a time. I have twenty questions ready to fire at Cassius and I can share this list with anyone who may be interested in this project. Curious minds want to know ;-) I agree both would be wonderful - Cato - want to cross the Hudson, amice (something real New Yorkers hate to do ;-) ???

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus


----- Original Message -----
From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 9:43 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Founder's Interview, etc.


Salve,

It is not my intention to "slam" anyone. If you do not know who
Flavius Vedius Germanicus is, you should be glad of the information.

Falvius Vedius and Marcus Cassius started Nova Roma together.
Flavius Vedius served as Consul, Senator, and Dictator. He
spearheaded many of our laws and wrote the Constitution. To talk
about an interview with the founders as one of Marcus Cassius and
Patricia Cassia is simply wrong, and unfairly leaves out the person
who was really THE major contributor.

I applaud your energy in arranging this. However, I suggest you
read the "Annals of Nova Roma" on the website. It will give you
some background into about the founding of NR, Flavius Vedius, and
some background info. you can use in your inetrview.

You should be able to contact Flavius vedius through his albim
webpage here:

http://www.novaroma.org/bin/view/civis?id=27

Best of luck on your project.

Vale,

Laenas

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Sensei Phil Perez"
<senseiphil@n...> wrote:
>
> Salve Laene,
>
> It's hard to believe someone would have a problem with even this
simple announcement. Critics abound for every little thing. Is it
any wonder people leave our community in droves. Since I have no
idea who Flavius Vedius is or where he may reside, why don't you
interview him and then we'll have a complete interview. Just in two
parts, mine and yours. If you are unwilling to do this, why bring it
up? Just to slam someone who is trying hard to contribute something
positive to our community? This is what the ML is famous for, isn't
it? I do thank you for that information though, up to now from every
source I have seen, Patricia has always been mentioned and included
as a co-founder. I guess now I'll have 21 questions to ask ;-)
>
> Vires et honos,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 4:33 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
>
>
> Salvete,
>
> Let me provide some information for this process. The founders
of Nova
> Roma are Flavius Vedius Germanicus and Marcus Cassius Julianus.
> Patrica Cassia, although a great contributor from the early
days, has
> never been considered a founder.
>
> An interview that did not include Flavius Vedius would be
incomplete
> and somewhat of a slight.
>
> Valete,
>
> G. Popillius Laenas
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The
fall of the roman empire
> Roman empire
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.10/190 - Release Date:
12/1/2005
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
Roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.10/190 - Release Date: 12/1/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40148 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
In a message dated 12/2/2005 2:14:44 PM Pacific Standard Time,
mlcinnyc@... writes:
The lex Cornelia et Maria de civitate eiuranda is amended by addition
as follows:

III. If a currently serving magistrate resigns from his office(s) or
his citizenship, either separately or concurrently, he will be
considered to have vacated any office(s) he may hold upon the
publication of his resignation. He may still resume his citizenship
in accordance to Section II of this law (within the nundina allowed);
his office, being vacated, will remain so until the magistrate
empowered to do so by law can call for an election to fill said
vacancy as prescribed by law."


Vale et valete,

Cato
This lex too is near and dear to my heart.

I'd like to add: "If the resigning magistrate wishes, he may stand in the
election for his former post."

This would solve the X hour remorse problem that seemingly plagues many of
our magistrates, "I never should have resigned, what was I thinking?"
In this way the people can put him back in office if they are so inclined.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40149 From: marcushoratius Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Tribunis Plebis et Quiritibus omnes
salutem plurinam dicit.

Previously in Nova Roma I was honored to serve as Tribunus Plebis
along with my colleague Titus Labienus Fortunatus, and also as
Flamen Cerealis. Out of filial piety for my paterfamilias, N.
Moravius Vado, that most honorable man, I felt compelled to resign
my office when he and other honorable members of the Senate
renounced their citizenship. After leaving Nova Roma I twice served
as consul of the Societas Via Romana, twice as rector of the
Collegium Religiosum, as Senator, Iurisconsultus, Pontifex Maximas,
Flamen Cerealis, augur, and as of late was a member of the Consilium
that drafted new regulae for that fine organization. I also serve
on the Board of Advisors to the Temple Religio Romana of California,
along with Pontifex Antonius Gryllus Graecus, as well as serve as a
moderator for the Temple's email list. In addition I serve as an
advisor and counselor for other religio Romana groups. At the
Academia Thules I have served as a praeceptor on Roman rituals. The
Senate of Nova Roma even passed a special resolution in recognition
for the work that I performed at the Academia, even though at the
time I was not yet a civis. Recently I have been appointed Caput
Generis Doctrinae Religionis Romanae at Academia Thules. Since
rejoining Nova Roma I have served as Scriba Censoris Census Primus
CFBQ as head of the Officina Census that performed the recent Census
2005, and I have accepted the appointment as Procurator in provincia
Lacus Magni offered me by propraetor Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus.

Formerly I served as an intelligence analyst in the US Army. I have
been a land surveyor, instructor, civil servant, and restaurant
owner. Currently I am retired, following complications from
injuries I received while serving in the military. I am married,
for the past thirty two years, and have fathered a daughter and five
sons. Having already lost three sons in the early years of their
lives, my youngest son now serves in US Army intelligence in Iraq.
My educational background has been in history (BA), land surveying
(AAS), and in education with a specialty in mathematics. I am
currently a member of the ACLU, NOW, the Sons of Italy, and have
previously been a member of such advocacy and charitable
organizations as the March of Dimes and the American Heart
Association. In my spare time I have been a contributor to the
University of Ottawa's update of the "Encyclopedia of Gods and
Goddesses," providing articles on the divinities of Italic tribes,
and have also been consulted in other research projects related to
the religious traditions of Roma Antiqua and Italia Archaica.

Today I enter the Forum dressed in toga candida to humbly offer once
more my experience and service to the Quirites Novae Romae as a
candidate for the office of Tribunus Plebis.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40150 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Tribune Albucius For Tribune (QSP)
Salvete omnes,

You cannot believe how pleased I am to see Tribune Albicius step up
to the plate. He certainly has been visible and done much credit for
his office this last year. He will certainly be a great asset for
this very important office and his previous experience shall be of
incalculable value to new cnadidates who are elected to office. All
the best of luck to him and should I be fortunate to be elected, I
will be pleased to serve with him.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tribune Albucius"
<albucius_aoe@h...> wrote:
>
> P. Memmius Albucius Plebiis Quiritibusque s.d.
>
> In candida toga an after mature consideration, I have the honor,
dear
> Plebeii, to present you my humble candidacy for the tribunate in
> MMDCCLVIIII a.u.c. (2006 c.e.).
>
> I have been one of your five tribunes of the plebs this year, in
2758
> a.u.c..
>
> Why a second candidacy ?
>
> My first motivation is to listen to several of you, Plebeii, and
to
> some Hon. Patricii, too, who have recently asked me to reconsider
my
> initial decision not to run for office this year. This
consideration
> has been backed up by the state that we have all made recently :
> there are not enough candidates for our plebeian offices.
>
> So I decide to tell you that I was ready to run for a new annual
> mandate in the Tribunate.
>
> Why the Tribunate ?
>
> First because I think that there are currently some experienced
cives
> who have good skills for Aedilitas plebis, and for our other non-
> strictly-plebeian magistracies.
>
> Then, because I think that I would, if elected, have good working
> relations with current tribune candidates, Hon. Vipsanius Agrippa,
> who has usefully assisted me this year and must be daily thanked
to
> have involved himself in our NR goods, with Hon. Suetonius
Paulinus,
> whose each intervention is clear and clever, and with former
consul
> Astur, whose work in « real life events » in Hispania is an
example
> for us all, and former Tribune Arminius, whose contribution for
Nova
> Roma has been decisive.
>
> Third, because I think that we need that some our offices be
occupied
> by citizens who have no political affiliation and no other
obligation
> except to serve our State and to honor our Gods.
>
> At last, in our situation of a lack of candidates, I think that my
> experience and my skills of lawyer (I do apologize again for
> them... ;-) ) may be useful to our Res publica.
>
> Concerning this experience, my objective has been, during my
office
> this year, to keep close to the mandate that you, the Plebs of
Nova
> Roma, has given me when You made me the honor to elect me last
year.
>
> This mandate was to fulfill the whole obligations and rights that
the
> constitution and the laws of Nova Roma give to the tribunes of the
> plebs.
>
> I have thus tried to develop a « legal », non political,
conception
> of the duty of the Tribune of the Plebs.
>
> The tribunate must be open to a daily collaboration with the other
> constitutional powers and, at the same time, be firm on the
respect
> of our leges by all, specially by our magistrates. One thing is to
> make our laws change, another to respect, first, our current
> legislation. This one is our true novaroman contract, and the way
we
> believe and practice roman values.
>
> I used this year the tribunician right of intercessio each time
that
> I considered, in full conscience, that law has not been respected,
> even for actions which would have had, once legally presented, my
> full support. Debates have occurred, and they have been useful for
> our democracy, whatever their conclusion.
>
> I have thus worked, last summer, with Hon. Consul Caesar on the
> application of our legislation on tax paying, which allowed the
> consulate to register, after real efforts, the payment of our
annual
> contribution by some of our illustrious magistrates (our laws
forbid
> a citizen to be in office if his/her tax is not paid).
>
> Though I have backed the return of resigning Saturninus in office,
I
> have then defended the right of a citizen to have his/her case
heard
> by the comitia plebis tributa when he considered that his
> constitutional rights were not respected by the decision of a
> tribune. I then underlined that any tribune had the right to speak
on
> behalf of the comitia, which is the Plebs itself. In order to try
to
> build an appropriate legal frame, I then proposed last august a
lex «
> de provocatione ».
>
> I have intervened in some various fields, as the proceedings of
> adoption, to have our law respected.
>
> I have assumed the current tasks of a tribune, as to answer the
> questions of the Plebeians, to organise the sessions of the
comitia
> plebis tributa, or to report the sessions of the Senate.
>
> At last, as a Tribune and as Legatus Galliae representing Hon.
> Propraetor Apollonius Scipio, I have, in August, attended the
> european conventus which gave me the chance to meet wonderful
people
> (they will all recognize theirselves).
>
> I have expressed, in our main list, my opinions on some of the key
> questions that we faced this year 2758, and which will arise again
in
> 2759 : the constitution, the resignation, the right of provocatio,
> the tax paying obligation, etc.. I ask each of you, Plebeii
> Quiritesque, to have a look of these posts in our ML. And,
naturally,
> to ask me for further questions if necessary.
>
> I have tried, at last, to keep some reserve in the main list, for
> magistrates must not, in my humble opinion, use our forum to
express
> daily their point of view.
>
> Concerning my current situation of Tribune, I will carry on my
duties
> for 2758 a.u.c. till Dec. 31, unless my candidacy might interfere
> with my obligations. In this last and sole case, I would let my
> colleagues tribunes represent our tribunate.
>
> Sincerely yours, Plebeii Quiritesque,
>
>
> P. Memmius Albucius
> Candidatus tribunicius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40151 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Declaration of Candidacy for Marcus Cassius Phillipus
Slavete omnes,

I will give my support and vote to Marcus Cassius Phillipus.
His enthusiasm, loyalty and work on behalf of Nova Roma is
unquestionable! Let us not overlook this gentlemen in his bid for
quaestorship for we will not be sorry.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40152 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Tribune Albucius For Tribune (QSP)
M. Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
yes you cannot imagine what a treat it's been this year
working with a man who vetoed the Ludi not once but twice.

The first time during the Megalesia, that was over the cultural
competition being in English, his actions suprised and angered me & I
explained this was a profound religious occasion.

Of course this did not deter Albucius from doing this again for the
Ludi Plebeii! What does this tell you about stubborness and a basic
lack of respect for the Religio?

Suetonius Paulinus I really don't know how you can support Albucius
who seems to learn nothing of Romanitas but interprets the
Constitution like an EU lawyer.

vale
Marca Hortensia Maior TRP
Caput Officina
Iuriis et Investgatio CFB
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40153 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Declaration of Candidacy for Marcus Cassius Phillipus
Salve Pauline,

Thank you my friend. I will live up to your trust in me!

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 9:26 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Declaration of Candidacy for Marcus Cassius Phillipus


Slavete omnes,

I will give my support and vote to Marcus Cassius Phillipus.
His enthusiasm, loyalty and work on behalf of Nova Roma is
unquestionable! Let us not overlook this gentlemen in his bid for
quaestorship for we will not be sorry.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus





SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
Roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.11/191 - Release Date: 12/2/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40154 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Tribune Albucius For Tribune (QSP)
Salve Marca Hortensia,

You are certainly entitled to your observations. I cannot read his
mind of course but I would rather let him answer you and the list on
these points.

Actually I had some different ideas than his over the last year as
well yet the following is what caught my interest:

'Third, because I think that we need that some our offices be
occupied
by citizens who have no political affiliation and no other obligation
except to serve our State and "to honor our Gods." (NB)

At last, in our situation of a lack of candidates, I think that my
experience and my skills of lawyer (I do apologize again for
them... ;-) ) may be useful to our Res publica.

Concerning this experience, my objective has been, during my office
this year, to keep close to the mandate that you, the Plebs of Nova
Roma, has given me when You made me the honor to elect me last year.

This mandate was to fulfill the whole obligations and rights that the
constitution and the laws of Nova Roma give to the tribunes of the
plebs.

I have thus tried to develop a « legal », non political, conception
of the duty of the Tribune of the Plebs.

The tribunate must be open to a daily collaboration with the other
constitutional powers and, at the same time, be firm on the respect
of our leges by all, specially by our magistrates. One thing is to
make our laws change, another to respect, first, our current
legislation. This one is our true novaroman contract, and the way we
believe and practice roman values."

Finally he along with you and Tribune Fuscus kept a high profile all
this year. I see he is working here right up to the end to get the
candidates registered. Also the lack of interested candidates for
office has been quite disappointing and the return of an experienced
tribune felt like a great relief to me. Anyway there are four others
who shall also have the vote once elected to office so no single one
has the licence to run amok so to speak.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus








--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
> yes you cannot imagine what a treat it's been this
year
> working with a man who vetoed the Ludi not once but twice.
>
> The first time during the Megalesia, that was over the cultural
> competition being in English, his actions suprised and angered me
& I
> explained this was a profound religious occasion.
>
> Of course this did not deter Albucius from doing this again for
the
> Ludi Plebeii! What does this tell you about stubborness and a
basic
> lack of respect for the Religio?
>
> Suetonius Paulinus I really don't know how you can support
Albucius
> who seems to learn nothing of Romanitas but interprets the
> Constitution like an EU lawyer.
>
> vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior TRP
> Caput Officina
> Iuriis et Investgatio CFB
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40155 From: Chuck Young Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Thank you, Raymond, for your kind reply. I hope you don't mind me using your name when I applied at Sodalitas Militarium.

How does one apply for Praefect?

Gaius Aurelius Scipio
Cohors II Asturum Equitata

raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@...> wrote:
SALVE, have you subscribed to the sodalitas militarium
list? They are a integral part of Nova Roma and are
currently looking for a praefect of Roman auxilia.
Your services might be useful there. BTW, welcome.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <openseasprod@...>
wrote:
> I am new to your group, however, I am not new to
living history and organizations like this.
>
> I have seen groups come and go, sometimes
inexplicably, for over 34 years. I feel it is a trend,
or flow, of hobbies everywhere. You can see it in
American Civil War reenacting. People are fleeing it
to other periods.
>
> If, like you say, you have lost 83% of your
membership, what plans are there to regain them, or to
find new people? There will always be good folks out
there who want to be a part of a group like this. What
are you, as the beaurocrats major of this
organization, going to do to find them and convince
them to become members?
>
> I joined because of the religious and historic
components of the group. I have long been a follower
of the historic Mars and Mythrus religions, and I find
on your site that is a componant of your group
philosophy. I also reenact Roman Auxilia and have a
group started to do the same. We are interested in the
same goals as you are: education and recreation of
ancient civilizations. I'm a soldier, and my place in
life is in service of my group.
>
> I have one suggestion for the group. Start a
political only forum so that discussions in the future
that may be considered alienating to the general
populus can be worked out in private. Leave the
regular forum to subjects germain to everyman, rather
than the politicos. if announcements need to be made
to the mob, that's great, but, the political fighting
should be left to a different playground. I know many
political types wouldn't like that. They thrive on
strife, however, most of the folks just want the bread
and circuses.
>
> Gaius Aurelius Scipio
> Cohors II Asturum Equitata
>
> marcushoratius <mhoratius@...> wrote:
> Salvete Quinte Pauline et Quirites omnes
>
> While conducting the census, the Officina Census
received emails
> from some former members. Nearly all of them
indicated that
> misconduct on Nova Roma lists by certain individuals
caused them to
> leave. As Censor Marinus posted earlier, former
members indicated
> that these individuals are certain former
magistrates. In addition
> to misconduct on the lists, other allegations were
made against
> former magistrates. Some of the former members
identified
> individual magistrates by name; one former
magistrate in particular
> was mentioned in every instance where names were
provided. Examples
> of some of these allegations were forwarded to
Censores Marinus and
> Fabius Buteo.
>
> I want to emphasize that the particular problem
identified by former
> members is one that existed in the past. The
results of the census,
> and the complaints we received in the Officina
Census, do not
> reflect on our current magistrates. Steps have been
taken this year
> to correct the outstanding problem that previously
characterized
> Nova Roman lists. It should also be emphasized that
the complaints
> we received came from a sampling of former members,
and therefore
> the information should be regarded as anecdotal.
The information
> came from only a few provinciae, nearly half from
one provincia
> alone, and does not indicate therefore that such
problems extended
> throughout Nova Roma. We should not, therefore, give
undue weight to
> this information
>
> Earlier I wrote to the censores to explain that I
think that the
> information we received may pertain directly to the
loss of perhaps
> 300 cives. It does not fully account for the loss
of over three
> thousand members that Nova Roma has experienced in
the past five
> years. However there was some indication of a
rippling effect.
> This was true more so in certain gentes and
provinciae than in
> others. Past problems concern us, but no single
cause can be
> attributed for the loss of 83% of our membership.
>
> Considering that so many have left Nova Roma, I
think that Iulius
> Sabinus may have been closer to the mark:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Iulius
Sabinus"
> <iulius_sabinus@y...> wrote:
> >
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com



---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





Quondo Omni Flunkus Mortati. (When all else fails, play dead!)
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum. (If you want peace, prepare for war)(Vegetius)
'Veni, Vidi, Castratavi Illegitimos' - we came, we saw, we castrated the b*stards...
"So I had a choice: either take the word of a madman, take the word of a man who had used weapons of mass destruction on his own people, or take action to defend America. Given that choice, I will defend America every time." --President George W. Bush
-The Darwin Award candidate-
Iraqi terrorist Khay Rahnajet didn't pay enough postage on a letter bomb. It came back with "Return to Sender" stamped on it. Forgetting it was the bomb, he opened it and was blown to bits.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40156 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
C. Equitius Cato Q. Fabio Maxmo quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

If the law was adopted as I suggest, Fabius Maximus, then the citizen
who resigned could stand for election to that magistracy as long as
they fulfill the requirements to do so: it calls for the vacancy to be
filled "as prescribed by law", which would include *all* qualified
citizens, including the recently-resigned citizen. No need for more
than that is necessary. The recently-resigned citizen is *exactly*
the same as any citizen who does not hold a magistracy. No more, no less.

Vale et valete,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@a... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 12/2/2005 2:14:44 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> mlcinnyc@g... writes:
> The lex Cornelia et Maria de civitate eiuranda is amended by addition
> as follows:
>
> III. If a currently serving magistrate resigns from his office(s) or
> his citizenship, either separately or concurrently, he will be
> considered to have vacated any office(s) he may hold upon the
> publication of his resignation. He may still resume his citizenship
> in accordance to Section II of this law (within the nundina allowed);
> his office, being vacated, will remain so until the magistrate
> empowered to do so by law can call for an election to fill said
> vacancy as prescribed by law."
>
>
> Vale et valete,
>
> Cato
> This lex too is near and dear to my heart.
>
> I'd like to add: "If the resigning magistrate wishes, he may stand
in the
> election for his former post."
>
> This would solve the X hour remorse problem that seemingly plagues
many of
> our magistrates, "I never should have resigned, what was I thinking?"
> In this way the people can put him back in office if they are so
inclined.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40157 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: P. Memmius Albucius
M. Lvcretivs Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.

Friends, I do not speak in support of the candidature of P. Memmius
Albucius for the office of Tribune of the Plebs. I would be very much
out of my place in doing so.

I do speak now however in support of P. Memmius Albucius the man and
the citizen.

I had the fortunate opportunity to meet P. Memmius Albucius in person
and I found him to be sincere and dedicated.

There is a suggestion circulating that P. Memmius Albucius may have
damaged the Religio, or I suppose more exactly the Pax Deorum, or at
least to have obstructed others by his actions or by his demeanor,
which has been likened to that of an EU lawyer.

I applaud P. Memmius Albucius for his lawyer-like approach. His
concern that actions take exactly the proper form I find to be well in
keeping with the traditions of the Religio. A close reading of the
posts of P. Memmius Albucius shows that he is not trying to obstruct
but rather he is taking a care for perfection in form.

If the language used by P. Memmius Albucius seems at times excessively
legalistic I can only say in his defence that he is writing very well,
in fact, in a language which is not his native tongue.

I cannot speak in defence of P. Memmius Albucius the Tribune or if he
is well or ill suited to the post of Tribune of the Plebs. I can say
that I am happy to see P. Memmius Albucius the man as an active
citizen of this Res Publica and I share his concerns that actions
performed in the name of the Religio be performed as perfectly as
possible.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40158 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Censor Marinus or the honorable T.Audens can better
answer that question for you. I have been labled sort
of a rabble rouser and I am not well liked but I love
Nova Roma despite my Americaness and would hate to see
someone with an apparent love for Roma Antiqua and
skill as a miles to boot not thrive here. I am most
certain you will accepted in the militarium and
contribute in a vacant post. M. Cassius Phillipus is
also a good man to know as he is a miles too. Vale.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <openseasprod@...>
wrote:
> Thank you, Raymond, for your kind reply. I hope you
don't mind me using you
> r name when I applied at Sodalitas Militarium.
>
> How does one apply for Praefect?
>
> Gaius Aurelius Scipio
> Cohors II Asturum Equitata
>
> raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@...> wrote:
> SALVE, have you subscribed to the sodalitas
militarium
> list? They are a integral part of Nova Roma and are
> currently looking for a praefect of Roman auxilia.
> Your services might be useful there. BTW, welcome.
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<openseasprod@...>
> wrote:
> > I am new to your group, however, I am not new to
> living history and organizations like this.
> >
> > I have seen groups come and go, sometimes
> inexplicably, for over 34 years. I feel it is a
trend,
> or flow, of hobbies everywhere. You can see it in
> American Civil War reenacting. People are fleeing it
> to other periods.
> >
> > If, like you say, you have lost 83% of your
> membership, what plans are there to regain them, or
to
> find new people? There will always be good folks out
> there who want to be a part of a group like this.
What
> are you, as the beaurocrats major of this
> organization, going to do to find them and convince
> them to become members?
> >
> > I joined because of the religious and historic
> components of the group. I have long been a follower
> of the historic Mars and Mythrus religions, and I
find
> on your site that is a componant of your group
> philosophy. I also reenact Roman Auxilia and have a
> group started to do the same. We are interested in
the
> same goals as you are: education and recreation of
> ancient civilizations. I'm a soldier, and my place
in
> life is in service of my group.
> >
> > I have one suggestion for the group. Start a
> political only forum so that discussions in the
future
> that may be considered alienating to the general
> populus can be worked out in private. Leave the
> regular forum to subjects germain to everyman,
rather
> than the politicos. if announcements need to be made
> to the mob, that's great, but, the political
fighting
> should be left to a different playground. I know
many
> political types wouldn't like that. They thrive on
> strife, however, most of the folks just want the
bread
> and circuses.
> >
> > Gaius Aurelius Scipio
> > Cohors II Asturum Equitata
> >
> > marcushoratius <mhoratius@...> wrote:
> > Salvete Quinte Pauline et Quirites omnes
> >
> > While conducting the census, the Officina Census
> received emails
> > from some former members. Nearly all of them
> indicated that
> > misconduct on Nova Roma lists by certain
individuals
> caused them to
> > leave. As Censor Marinus posted earlier, former
> members indicated
> > that these individuals are certain former
> magistrates. In addition
> > to misconduct on the lists, other allegations were
> made against
> > former magistrates. Some of the former members
> identified
> > individual magistrates by name; one former
> magistrate in particular
> > was mentioned in every instance where names were
> provided. Examples
> > of some of these allegations were forwarded to
> Censores Marinus and
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40159 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
M. Hortensia L. Cassio spd;
I am the producer of Vox Romana which is the radio, "podcast"
meaning computer radio station. We were to debut for the Ludi Plebei
in honour of Iuppiter OP and the Plebians but some of our
correspondants had computer problem so it will be delayed for a month
or two, but not two worry I shall post & let everyone know our debut
broadcast!
vale
Marca Hortensia Maior
Producer "Vox Romana"
> Salve,
>
> How does one go about getting these podcasts?
>
> PAX DEORUM
>
> Lucius Cassius Cornutus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40160 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: P. Memmius Albucius
M.Hortensia Lucretio Agricola spd;
salve we are both practitioners so I leave it to you to ask
either Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus or G. Minucius Hadrianus both
pontiffs what the correct behavior is.

You are confusing the punctiliousness of the public religious rite,
with civil procedure. But I don't wish to argue, please ask our
state religious officials.

All it takes or would have taken is an email to our pontiffs to
ask...that is the point. He vetoed the Megalesia once & then did not
hesitate without discussing it to do it again for the Ludi Plebei.
Intemperate, I would say he needs more time to learn & appreciate
Romanitas.
Let him help me and run as a plebian aedile, we need to fill these
posts and perhaps he will begin to understand the meaning of the
Ludi & all the hard work.
vale
Marca Hortensia Maior TRP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40161 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-12-02
Subject: Re: P. Memmius Albucius
M. Lvcretivs Agricola M. Hortensiae Maiori S.P.D.

You are exactly right. One of those men should have been consulted.

I'm sure that the question will come up again, sooner or later, so it
would still be good to put the question to them and to see it
explained in public.

My friend, I see that we disagree about the extent this particular
public religious rite can be seen as distinct from a civil procedure,
but that is natural and it is a good question for people with more
expertise than I have.

I thank you for answering as you always do, promptly and thoughtfully.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> M.Hortensia Lucretio Agricola spd;
> salve we are both practitioners so I leave it to you to ask
> either Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus or G. Minucius Hadrianus both
> pontiffs what the correct behavior is.
>
> You are confusing the punctiliousness of the public religious rite,
> with civil procedure. But I don't wish to argue, please ask our
> state religious officials.
>
> All it takes or would have taken is an email to our pontiffs to
> ask...that is the point. He vetoed the Megalesia once & then did not
> hesitate without discussing it to do it again for the Ludi Plebei.
> Intemperate, I would say he needs more time to learn & appreciate
> Romanitas.
> Let him help me and run as a plebian aedile, we need to fill these
> posts and perhaps he will begin to understand the meaning of the
> Ludi & all the hard work.
> vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior TRP
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40162 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Question For M. Moravius Horatianus (Census)
Salve M. Moravi Horatian,

I am glad to see a few more citizens stepping up to the plate today
in order to run for office; good show!

I just have a question though with regards to the population decline
in NR. Now in message 40140, Gaius Aurelius Scipio (Chuck) pointed
out that there has been a noticeable trend in the drop of
populations in various historical type societies such as American
Civil War reenactment etc. I also noticed in your platform that you
held some previous high positions in the SVR. Now I have never
visited that group so I was wondering if over the last 3 or 4 years
it was growing slow, exponentially, peaked and stayed level or began
to decline drastically in the same time period. If the SVR is indeed
increasing continually in population, is there anything NR can learn
from this society as far as recruitment and retention of citizens
go?


Thanks!

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40163 From: Chuck Young Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
I appreciate a good rabble rouser. We Americans have always been known as the ones who raise the roof at times. That is what makes us who we are. If we didn't, nothing would get done, and good folks like our European cousins might not have anything to talk about behind our backs! ;-)

I just love poking fun, however, the fact is that our hobby is like a family. There are black sheep and every sort of family oddity, but in the end, we stick together as a family. I hate to see family fights in the hobby. It is a fact that reenactors argue some of the most idiotic topics. If we didn't, we'd be stamp collectors sitting alone in our basements with magnifying glasses pouring over ripples and creases. Don't get me wrong, stamp collecting is a noble hobby, but not quite as social as living history is. That is what makes us different, and we should celebrate the fact that we are different, and not drive off the people who help make us who we are.

I have watched many groups eat their own, so to speak. There is a certain type of person who writes before he thinks. These well meaning folks can ruin a dream, without meaning to. We need them as much as we need the person who is easily offended by their abuse. This is how we grow and learn from the hobby. I have always encouraged the members of any group I have belonged to to speak up and not be shy. Get it out, and do so with thought before you send it. Maybe rephrase a perceived slander so not to offend. Oh, well...

I'm rambleing, I better go to bed.:-0

Gaius Aurelius Scipio
Cohors II Asturum Equitata

raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@...> wrote:
Censor Marinus or the honorable T.Audens can better
answer that question for you. I have been labled sort
of a rabble rouser and I am not well liked but I love
Nova Roma despite my Americaness and would hate to see
someone with an apparent love for Roma Antiqua and
skill as a miles to boot not thrive here. I am most
certain you will accepted in the militarium and
contribute in a vacant post. M. Cassius Phillipus is
also a good man to know as he is a miles too. Vale.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <openseasprod@...>
wrote:
> Thank you, Raymond, for your kind reply. I hope you
don't mind me using you
> r name when I applied at Sodalitas Militarium.
>
> How does one apply for Praefect?
>
> Gaius Aurelius Scipio
> Cohors II Asturum Equitata
>
> raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@...> wrote:
> SALVE, have you subscribed to the sodalitas
militarium
> list? They are a integral part of Nova Roma and are
> currently looking for a praefect of Roman auxilia.
> Your services might be useful there. BTW, welcome.
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<openseasprod@...>
> wrote:
> > I am new to your group, however, I am not new to
> living history and organizations like this.
> >
> > I have seen groups come and go, sometimes
> inexplicably, for over 34 years. I feel it is a
trend,
> or flow, of hobbies everywhere. You can see it in
> American Civil War reenacting. People are fleeing it
> to other periods.
> >
> > If, like you say, you have lost 83% of your
> membership, what plans are there to regain them, or
to
> find new people? There will always be good folks out
> there who want to be a part of a group like this.
What
> are you, as the beaurocrats major of this
> organization, going to do to find them and convince
> them to become members?
> >
> > I joined because of the religious and historic
> components of the group. I have long been a follower
> of the historic Mars and Mythrus religions, and I
find
> on your site that is a componant of your group
> philosophy. I also reenact Roman Auxilia and have a
> group started to do the same. We are interested in
the
> same goals as you are: education and recreation of
> ancient civilizations. I'm a soldier, and my place
in
> life is in service of my group.
> >
> > I have one suggestion for the group. Start a
> political only forum so that discussions in the
future
> that may be considered alienating to the general
> populus can be worked out in private. Leave the
> regular forum to subjects germain to everyman,
rather
> than the politicos. if announcements need to be made
> to the mob, that's great, but, the political
fighting
> should be left to a different playground. I know
many
> political types wouldn't like that. They thrive on
> strife, however, most of the folks just want the
bread
> and circuses.
> >
> > Gaius Aurelius Scipio
> > Cohors II Asturum Equitata
> >
> > marcushoratius <mhoratius@...> wrote:
> > Salvete Quinte Pauline et Quirites omnes
> >
> > While conducting the census, the Officina Census
> received emails
> > from some former members. Nearly all of them
> indicated that
> > misconduct on Nova Roma lists by certain
individuals
> caused them to
> > leave. As Censor Marinus posted earlier, former
> members indicated
> > that these individuals are certain former
> magistrates. In addition
> > to misconduct on the lists, other allegations were
> made against
> > former magistrates. Some of the former members
> identified
> > individual magistrates by name; one former
> magistrate in particular
> > was mentioned in every instance where names were
> provided. Examples
> > of some of these allegations were forwarded to
> Censores Marinus and
====== Message Truncated ======


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com



SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire Roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





Quondo Omni Flunkus Mortati. (When all else fails, play dead!)
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum. (If you want peace, prepare for war)(Vegetius)
'Veni, Vidi, Castratavi Illegitimos' - we came, we saw, we castrated the b*stards...
"So I had a choice: either take the word of a madman, take the word of a man who had used weapons of mass destruction on his own people, or take action to defend America. Given that choice, I will defend America every time." --President George W. Bush
-The Darwin Award candidate-
Iraqi terrorist Khay Rahnajet didn't pay enough postage on a letter bomb. It came back with "Return to Sender" stamped on it. Forgetting it was the bomb, he opened it and was blown to bits.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40164 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Slave Gai Aureli,

LOL, very good, humorous well spoken.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Young <openseasprod@y...>
wrote:
>
> I appreciate a good rabble rouser. We Americans have always been
known as the ones who raise the roof at times. That is what makes us
who we are. If we didn't, nothing would get done, and good folks
like our European cousins might not have anything to talk about
behind our backs! ;-)
>
> I just love poking fun, however, the fact is that our hobby is
like a family. There are black sheep and every sort of family
oddity, but in the end, we stick together as a family. I hate to see
family fights in the hobby. It is a fact that reenactors argue some
of the most idiotic topics. If we didn't, we'd be stamp collectors
sitting alone in our basements with magnifying glasses pouring over
ripples and creases. Don't get me wrong, stamp collecting is a
noble hobby, but not quite as social as living history is. That is
what makes us different, and we should celebrate the fact that we
are different, and not drive off the people who help make us who we
are.
>
> I have watched many groups eat their own, so to speak. There is
a certain type of person who writes before he thinks. These well
meaning folks can ruin a dream, without meaning to. We need them as
much as we need the person who is easily offended by their abuse.
This is how we grow and learn from the hobby. I have always
encouraged the members of any group I have belonged to to speak up
and not be shy. Get it out, and do so with thought before you send
it. Maybe rephrase a perceived slander so not to offend. Oh, well...
>
> I'm rambleing, I better go to bed.:-0
>
> Gaius Aurelius Scipio
> Cohors II Asturum Equitata
>
> raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> Censor Marinus or the honorable T.Audens can better
> answer that question for you. I have been labled sort
> of a rabble rouser and I am not well liked but I love
> Nova Roma despite my Americaness and would hate to see
> someone with an apparent love for Roma Antiqua and
> skill as a miles to boot not thrive here. I am most
> certain you will accepted in the militarium and
> contribute in a vacant post. M. Cassius Phillipus is
> also a good man to know as he is a miles too. Vale.
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <openseasprod@y...>
> wrote:
> > Thank you, Raymond, for your kind reply. I hope you
> don't mind me using you
> > r name when I applied at Sodalitas Militarium.
> >
> > How does one apply for Praefect?
> >
> > Gaius Aurelius Scipio
> > Cohors II Asturum Equitata
> >
> > raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> > SALVE, have you subscribed to the sodalitas
> militarium
> > list? They are a integral part of Nova Roma and are
> > currently looking for a praefect of Roman auxilia.
> > Your services might be useful there. BTW, welcome.
> > --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> <openseasprod@y...>
> > wrote:
> > > I am new to your group, however, I am not new to
> > living history and organizations like this.
> > >
> > > I have seen groups come and go, sometimes
> > inexplicably, for over 34 years. I feel it is a
> trend,
> > or flow, of hobbies everywhere. You can see it in
> > American Civil War reenacting. People are fleeing it
> > to other periods.
> > >
> > > If, like you say, you have lost 83% of your
> > membership, what plans are there to regain them, or
> to
> > find new people? There will always be good folks out
> > there who want to be a part of a group like this.
> What
> > are you, as the beaurocrats major of this
> > organization, going to do to find them and convince
> > them to become members?
> > >
> > > I joined because of the religious and historic
> > components of the group. I have long been a follower
> > of the historic Mars and Mythrus religions, and I
> find
> > on your site that is a componant of your group
> > philosophy. I also reenact Roman Auxilia and have a
> > group started to do the same. We are interested in
> the
> > same goals as you are: education and recreation of
> > ancient civilizations. I'm a soldier, and my place
> in
> > life is in service of my group.
> > >
> > > I have one suggestion for the group. Start a
> > political only forum so that discussions in the
> future
> > that may be considered alienating to the general
> > populus can be worked out in private. Leave the
> > regular forum to subjects germain to everyman,
> rather
> > than the politicos. if announcements need to be made
> > to the mob, that's great, but, the political
> fighting
> > should be left to a different playground. I know
> many
> > political types wouldn't like that. They thrive on
> > strife, however, most of the folks just want the
> bread
> > and circuses.
> > >
> > > Gaius Aurelius Scipio
> > > Cohors II Asturum Equitata
> > >
> > > marcushoratius <mhoratius@s...> wrote:
> > > Salvete Quinte Pauline et Quirites omnes
> > >
> > > While conducting the census, the Officina Census
> > received emails
> > > from some former members. Nearly all of them
> > indicated that
> > > misconduct on Nova Roma lists by certain
> individuals
> > caused them to
> > > leave. As Censor Marinus posted earlier, former
> > members indicated
> > > that these individuals are certain former
> > magistrates. In addition
> > > to misconduct on the lists, other allegations were
> > made against
> > > former magistrates. Some of the former members
> > identified
> > > individual magistrates by name; one former
> > magistrate in particular
> > > was mentioned in every instance where names were
> > provided. Examples
> > > of some of these allegations were forwarded to
> > Censores Marinus and
> === Message Truncated ===
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________
> Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
> Just $16.99/mo. or less.
> dsl.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of
the roman empire Roman empire
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> Quondo Omni Flunkus Mortati. (When all else fails, play dead!)
> Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum. (If you want peace, prepare
for war)(Vegetius)
> 'Veni, Vidi, Castratavi Illegitimos' - we came, we saw, we
castrated the b*stards...
> "So I had a choice: either take the word of a madman, take the
word of a man who had used weapons of mass destruction on his own
people, or take action to defend America. Given that choice, I will
defend America every time." --President George W. Bush
> -The Darwin Award candidate-
> Iraqi terrorist Khay Rahnajet didn't pay enough postage
on a letter bomb. It came back with "Return to Sender"
stamped on it. Forgetting it was the bomb, he opened it
and was blown to bits.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40165 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: The Upcoming Elections
> A. Tullia Scholastica Q. Caecilio Metello Postumiano quiritibusque omnibus
> S.P.D.
>
> Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit.
>
> Rempublicam Di servent.
>
> I come before you now, Citizens, not to offer my endorsements, or to
> announce my candidacy for any office, nor to remind you of your duty as
> citizens to cast your votes during the elections, however much I may, as
> you know, like to do all of the above. Today, rather, I come before you
> to ask you, and to prevail upon you, to offer yourselves as candidates
> for office.
>
> To date, so far as I am aware, we are yet still in need of a candidate
> for the plebeian offices, Aedilis Plebis and Tribunus Plebis. Aside
> that, we need also candidates for the "lesser" offices: 3 Diribitores
>
> ATS: We may need only two diribitores, for one of the candidates for
> rogator mistakenly believes that this office still deals with elections. As
> he is Brazilian, neither I nor many of us can speak his language to convince
> him otherwise. A post he wrote (#40014) speaks of dealing with elections,
> where he uses rogator in its previous sense of Œelection official,¹ so I
> suspect that he actually wants to run for diribitor or custos. We need both.
>
> This insistence on correctness in the name of the post one seeks puts me
> in an awkward position as a candidate for this position, but as I said in an
> earlier post, I wouldn¹t want anyone to assume an office whose duties were far
> removed from those the candidate expected, or for anyone to vote for someone
> whose expectations are so different from the reality of the office sought. In
> any case, both I and the other scriba who are seeking the office of rogator
> will be working in the censor¹s office of approvals next year, just as this
> year, and will be performing similar tasks to those of the rogatores whether
> or not we are elected; the ³advantage² is that we get to do even more work.
> Anyone who thinks the rogator counts votes during occasional elections will be
> in for a rude awakening if elected to that position as presently constituted,
> for he or she must collect censorial mail, read it, check the validity of the
> names and ages of the applicants, send questionable names to a separate board
> for Latinity checks, assign prospective citizens to scribae for processing and
> eventual exam sending and correcting, as well as perform a host of other
> routine administrative tasks. Since the addressee of this post, Q. Caecilius
> Metellus, is a censorial scriba, but not a candidate, he can verify all of
> this to anyone¹s satisfaction, and add a few more points as well.
>
> are needed, 1 Custos, and 1 Editor Commentariorum. I think, as much as
> many, I am aware of the lack of pomp and glory there is to be gained in
> these offices. There are no lictors for these offices, nor a bench and
> purple-bordered toga; no massive amounts of century points, nor even a
> seat in the Senate, or the right to pronounce intercessio. But there is
> one thing that comes from service in this office, which can not, by
> anyone, be removed from the office. In serving in these positions,
> there is the honor, and the dignity, of serving the Respublica, and of
> completing what many surely know to be the epitome of hard, tedious work.
>
> ATS: To which I may add that the position of rogator has similar hard
> work. I noted in my declaration that there wasn¹t much pomp or power connected
> with any of these very necessary offices.
>
> There may, however, be a candidate for editor commentariorum, for a
> gentleman on the New Roman board offered to perform that service, but may have
> misunderstood that he had to be elected to this position, not be handed it by
> M. Minucius-Tiberius Audens, and may not therefore have fulfilled the
> requirements dealing with age and citizenship duration, inter alia. He gives
> his Roman name as T.G. Barbatus.
>
> There are a few who have taken upon these tasks; some of whom are no
> longer with us, others who are now seeking higher offices. Shall we
> now, by not even paying our previous magistrates the respect of offering
> successors to them, send the message that their previous work has been
> meaningless?
>
> Without Diribitores, I ask you, who will count the votes? Without
> Custodes, who will verify the counts, and announce them to the presiding
> magistrates? In fact, without these two offices, how can new
> magistrates, from the lowest ranks to the highest, be elected? Even
> more, without Aediles Plebis, who will ensure that our plebeian
> heritage, the worship of our Mother Ceres, will continue? Consider
> these things, I ask you, and you will find that indeed our officers are
> necessary.
>
> ATS: Possibly Gallio Velius Marsallas, who held a position analogous to
> that of diribitor, might be willing to step forward again. Perhaps others who
> held that office in the past would join as well. NR will grind to a halt if
> we don¹t have candidates for these lesser offices.
>
> Citizens, I am sure you have busy schedules. Some of us are working
> twenty-two hours per day. Many of us have families for which we have
> duties there. But consider this one last thing, Quirites. If not for
> the Respublica, if not for the Dream that was Rome, why are we here?
>
> Pro Senatu, Pro Populo, Pro Roma.
>
> Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus,
> Civis Novae Romae
> Pontifex
> Fetialis
> Diribitor
> Legatus Provinciae Lacuum Magnorum
> Scriba Censoris
> Scriba Interpretis
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40166 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
In a message dated 12/2/2005 5:43:27 PM Pacific Standard Time,
mhoratius@... writes:
Today I enter the Forum dressed in toga candida to humbly offer once
more my experience and service to the Quirites Novae Romae as a
candidate for the office of Tribunus Plebis.
Did not you resign forn Nova Roma because you broke the law?

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40167 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
In a message dated 12/2/2005 7:36:33 PM Pacific Standard Time,
mlcinnyc@... writes:
Citizen resigned could stand for election to that magistracy as long as
they fulfill the requirements to do so: it calls for the vacancy to be
filled "as prescribed by law", which would include *all* qualified
citizens, including the recently-resigned citizen. No need for more
than that is necessary. The recently-resigned citizen is *exactly*
the same as any citizen who does not hold a magistracy. No more, no less
Good, the language was unclear to me. Thanks for the clarification.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40168 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
In a message dated 12/2/2005 8:04:07 PM Pacific Standard Time,
rory12001@... writes:
I am the producer of Vox Romana which is the radio, "podcast"
meaning computer radio station. We were to debut for the Ludi Plebei
in honour of Iuppiter OP and the Plebians but some of our
correspondants had computer problem so it will be delayed for a month
or two, but not two worry I shall post & let everyone know our debut
broadcast!
So you are putting up the money to pay for the broadcast?
How $$ much is involved, and how do you get it back?

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40169 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: a.d. III Non. Dec.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem III Nones Decembris; haec dies nefastus est.

"The consuls left to confer with Pontius. When the victor began to
insist upon a treaty, they told him that a treaty could not possibly
be made without the orders of the people nor without the fetials and
the usual ceremonial. So that the convention of Claudium did not, as
is commonly believed and as even Claudius asserts, take the form of a
regular treaty. It was concluded through a sponsio, i.e. by the
officers giving their word of honour to observe the conditions. For
what need would there have been in the case of a treaty for any pledge
from the officers or for any hostages, since in concluding a treaty
the imprecation is always used: "By whosesoever default it may come
about that the said conditions are not observed, may Jupiter so smite
that people as this swine is now struck by the fetials." The consuls,
the staff-officers, the quaestors, and the military tribunes all gave
their word on oath, and all their names are extant today, whereas if a
regular treaty had been concluded no names but those of the two
fetials would have survived. Owing to the inevitable delay in
arranging a treaty, 600 equites were demanded as hostages to answer
with their lives if the terms of the capitulation were not observed.
Then a definite time was fixed for surrendering the hostages and
sending the army, deprived of its arms, under the yoke. The return of
the consuls with the terms of surrender renewed the grief and distress
in the camp. So bitter was the feeling that the men had difficulty in
keeping their hands off those "through whose rashness," they said,
"they had been brought into that place and through whose cowardice
they would have to leave it in a more shameful plight than they had
come. They had had no guides who knew the neighbourhood, no scouts had
been thrown out, they had fallen blindly like wild animals into a
trap." There they were, looking at each other, gazing sadly at the
armour and weapons which were soon to be given up, their right hands
which were to be defenceless, their bodies which were to be at the
mercy of their enemies. They pictured to themselves the hostile yoke,
the taunts and insulting looks of the victors, their marching disarmed
between the armed ranks, and then afterwards the miserable progress of
an army in disgrace through the cities of their allies, their return
to their country and their parents, whither their ancestors had so
often returned in triumphal procession. They alone, they said, had
been defeated without receiving a single wound, or using a single
weapon, or fighting a single battle, they had not been allowed to draw
the sword or come to grips with the enemy; courage and strength had
been given them in vain. While they were uttering these indignant
protests, the hour of their humiliation arrived which was to make
everything more bitter for them by actual experience than they had
anticipated or imagined. First of all they were ordered to lay down
their arms and go outside the rampart with only one garment each. The
first to be dealt with were those surrendered as hostages who were
taken away for safe keeping. Next, the lictors were ordered to retire
from the consuls, who were then stripped of their paludamenta. This
aroused such deep commiseration amongst those who a short time ago had
been cursing them and saying that they ought to be surrendered and
scourged, that every man, forgetting his own plight, turned away his
eyes from such an outrage upon the majesty of state as from a
spectacle too horrible to behold." - Livy, History of Rome 9.5



"Publius Clodius was a man of noble birth and notable for his wealth
and reputation, but not even the most notorious scoundrels came close
to him in insolence and audacity. Clodius was in love with Caesar's
wife Pompeia, and she was not unwilling. But a close watch was kept on
the women's apartment, and Caesar's mother Aurelia followed the young
wife around and made it difficult and dangerous for the lovers to
meet. The Romans have a goddess whom they call Good, whom the Greeks
call the Women's Goddess. The Phrygians say that this goddess
originated with them, and that she was the mother of their king Midas.
The Romans say that she was a Dryad nymph who married Faunus, and the
Greeks say that she was the Unnameable One among the mothers of
Dionysus. For this reason the women who celebrate her rites cover
their tents with vine-branches, and a sacred serpent sits beside the
goddess on her throne, as in the myth. It is unlawful for a man to
approach or to be in the house when the rites are celebrated. The
women, alone by themselves, are said to perform rites that conform to
Orphic ritual during the sacred ceremony. As a result, when the time
for the festival comes, and a man is consul or praetor or general, he
goes away and takes every male with him, and his wife takes over the
house and decorates it for the festival. Most of the rites are
celebrated at night, and with great amounts of festivity in the revels
and music as well.
At the time [that the incident occurred] Pompeia was celebrating this
ritual; Clodius did not yet have a beard and for this reason thought
that he would escape detection if he were dressed up as lyre-player,
and went into the house looking like a young woman. He found the doors
open and was led in without difficulty by a slave-woman who was in on
the plot; this woman went to Pompeia and told her, and some time
passed, but Clodius could not bear to wait, and as he was wandering
around the large house and trying to avoid the lights, one of
Aurelia's attendants got hold of him, and asked him to play with her,
as one woman might with another, and when he refused, she dragged him
before the others and asked who he was and where he came from.
Clodius said that he was waiting for Pompeia's slave Abra (which
happened to be the woman's name), and gave himself away by his voice.
The attendant dashed away from him towards the lights and the crowd,
shouting that she had caught a man. The women were terrified, and
Aurelia called a halt to the rites of the goddess and hid the sacred
objects; she ordered the doors to be shut and went around the house
with torches, looking for Clodius. He was found in the room that
belonged to the girl where he had gone in an attempt to escape. When
he was discovered, he was taken through the doors by the women and
thrown out of the house. That night the women went right off and told
their husbands about the affair, and during the day the story spread
through the city that Clodius had been involved in sacrilege and had
committed injustice against not only those he had insulted, but the
city and the gods. Clodius was indicted for sacrilege by one of the
tribunes, and the most influential senators joined forces against him
and testified about other dreadful outrages he had committed and his
incest with his sister, who was married to Lucullus. But the common
people strenuously opposed these senators' efforts, and defended
Clodius, and the mob helped him considerably by terrifying and
frightening the jury. Caesar immediately divorced Pompeia, but when
he was summoned as a witness in the trial said that he knew nothing
about the accusations against Clodius. The prosecutor asked him about
the apparent contradiction: 'why then did you divorce your wife?' He
answered, 'because I thought my wife should be above suspicion'. Some
say that that was what Caesar really thought; others that he was eager
to save Clodius in order to gratify the common people. Clodius was
acquitted because most of the jurors handed in their opinions in
illegible writing, so that they would not endanger themselves with the
common people by voting against him, or disgrace themselves with the
nobility by letting him off." - Plutarch, Lives, "Iulius Caesar"
9.1,4; 10.1-6

Today is held in honor of Bona Dea. Bona Dea is the patron of the
good of the earth and of chastity and fertility in women. She is the
daughter of the god Faunus and she herself is often called Fauna. She
had a temple on the Aventine Hill, but her secret rites were not held
there but in the house of a prominent Roman magistrate or the Pontifex
Maximus. Only women were admitted and even representations of men and
beasts were removed. At these secret meetings it was forbidden to
speak the words 'wine' and 'myrtle' because Faunus had once made her
drunk and beaten her with a myrtle stick. Bona Dea was invoked for
healing and for freedom from slavery; many of her worshippers were
freed slaves and plebians, and many were women seeking aid in sickness
or for fertility. She was also considered a protector from
earthquakes. Bona Dea, or the "Good Goddess", was represented under
the form of a matron with her right hand opened, as if tendering
assistance to the helpless, and holding a loaf in her left hand. She
was also venerated under the name of Ops, and other denominations, but
with the highest attributes; and when so designated, she was
worshipped by men and boys, as well as women and virgins; and priests
ministered to her in dances with brazen cymbals. These motions
signified that the Earth only imparted blessings upon being constantly
moved; and as brass was discovered before iron, the cymbals were
composed of that metal to indicate her antiquity. The worshippers
seated themselves on the ground, and the posture of devotion was
bending forward, and touching the ground with the right hand. Her
sacrificial victim was a sow (porca) called damium. The goddess
herself was also known as Damia and her priestess as damiatrix. These
names are almost certainly Greek, and it is highly probable that the
Greek cult of Damia was grafted onto the original cult of the Roman
goddess Bona Dea. On the head of the goddess was placed a crown of
towers, denoting strength.

In the year 62 B.C, following the consulship of Cicero and the
destruction of the Catilinian conspiracy, the office of Pontifex
Maximus (more a political than religious office) was held by Julius
Caesar. Since all males, even male animals, were excluded from the
event, Caesar absented himself for the evening and the ceremony was
planned and hosted by his wife Pompeia.

Since Pompeia was not the most stable of women, her mother-in-law
Aurelia, Caesar's respected and noble mother, was actually in charge
of the details. She noticed one woman who was heavily cloaked, tall,
and with an affected tone in her voice. Aurelia prided herself on
knowing every guest present but she could not recall this individual.
She asked a servant girl to keep an eye on the unknown guest, who lost
control of her affected voice and was discovered to be in fact a man.
He escaped from the house without being definitively identified.

Rumors flew. No one in Rome doubted that the guilty man was Publius
Clodius Pulcher: it was not unlike him to play wild pranks -- even
with so sacred an event as the Bona Dea ceremony. One story suggested
that Clodius and Pompeia were having an affair and that she herself
had smuggled him into her house. This was a difficult accusation to
squelch. An impiety certainly had occurred and conservative Romans
were very upset. In response, Caesar divorced Pompeia, reputedly
justifying himself --- in a quote of unknown origins --- by asserting
that "Caesar's wife must be above suspicion." There was no proof at
all, only gossip and suspicion, of Pompeia's involvement. But for
Caesar it may have been a useful way to get rid of a wife whom he had
married for political reasons that no longer mattered.

Clodius was actually brought to trial for the sacrilege in 61 B.C.
(693 A.U.C.). He offered an alibi defense, claiming that he had been
out of town on the night in question. Cicero spoke against him and
with his skillful oratory he demolished Clodius's alibi. Nevertheless,
the jury -- thought to have been well bribed -- voted to acquit
Clodius. Because of his prosecution, Cicero acquired a dangerous and
powerful enemy: three years later (in 58 B.C.) Clodius was chiefly
responsible for Cicero's exile from Rome.


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy, Bona Dea (http://www.britannica.com/) and
(http://www.pantheon.org/) and
(http://womenshistory.about.com/od/ancientrome/p/bona_dea.htm) and
(http://www.fromoldbooks.org/Hone/pages/0000-Bona-Dea-The-Earth/) and
(http://classics.mit.edu/Browse/browse-Plutarch.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40170 From: Tribune Albucius Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Eheu..... Hortensia (my candidacy)
P. Memmius Albucius Hortensiae, Suetonio Lucretio omnibusque s.d.


You have reacted to my candidacy, considering that it would be
negative for Nova Roma.

Hon. Suetonius and Lucretius have already put forward some of the
reasonable arguments that I could have used myself, and I sincerely
thank them for this. I would, as a candidate, and because you are
questioning my skills, romanitas and dedication to our Gods, to
remind you some points.

First, I have never attacked you, either publicly or privately, nor
said my doubts about your skills. Now, since some weeks, you seem
very angry about me. I am really sorry for taking that way your
precious time and preventing you using your wisdom and cleverness for
higher tasks. I am just thinking that you had violent discussions
with some (is "some" still accurate ?) of our citizens, and each time
you sat in the seat (but can you really stay still in a seat ?) of a
self-designated public prosecutor.

Second, and as I have reminded you some days ago, I have several
times spoken for you to smooth the irritations that your statements
had created.

So, I am wondering if you do not need, in order to renew your
personal energy, to find and find again a matter of trouble with one
of your fellow citizens. I do not know if you then work on a
trimestrial rythmn, as some pretend it, but after quarelling with our
Pontifices, or Hon. Tribune Fuscus, you would now want to feed
yourself at my blood, dear ?

You seem to have elected yourself as teacher in Romanitas. You have
probably been right, because I would not have thought to you for this
office. Why ? First because romanitas is a very large and complex
concept, which every one of us lives, mostly in her/his daily
behavior. So, as I personnally do not know how all my fellow cives
live this daily life, I urge not, myself, giving lessons and awards.

Second, for you do not often give public proofs of your own
romanitas. Romanitas, may I remind you, include at least our roman
values. Do insults and general value judgments, that you regularly
use, enter these values ? I do not think so. Yes, I understand that
life and our Res publica would be better (for you) if every one would
agree with your points of view...

On religion, you are saying Hon. Agricola that he confuses « the
punctiliousness of the public religious rite with civil procedure ».
I thank you reminding that these are two different aspects in each of
our public events, specially in our Ludi. They, among others, have
been made to honor the Gods. But what we should keep in mind, if you
have still therein any place for this central point, is that our
whole roman system has been lived as a way to honor the Gods and to «
translate » their perfection, characteristics, skills in public human
life. So, not respecting the law and what you call « the
punctiliousness » of the rite are, in my eyes, not respecting the
rite itself, then not respecting our Gods. So, each time an
magisterial act has respected our laws (see the recent Ludi perfectly
organised by the Aediles curules), I have naturally found no legal
reason to intervene.

I will not say more, but I want to thank you for proposing the Plebs
my election as Aedilis plebis. I am touched that you recognize, here
at least, the possible skills that I could have in this office. But I
have already answered the question in my candidacy. And you seem
forgetting that we should have to work together, you and me ... Very
attentive to my own health, I prefer declining your spontaneaous ( ?)
proposal.

Vale,

P. Memmius Albucius
Candidatus tribunicius




In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, you wrote:
>
> M.Hortensia Lucretio Agricola spd;
> salve we are both practitioners so I leave it to you to ask
> either Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus or G. Minucius Hadrianus both
> pontiffs what the correct behavior is.
>
> You are confusing the punctiliousness of the public religious rite,
> with civil procedure. But I don't wish to argue, please ask our
> state religious officials.
>
> All it takes or would have taken is an email to our pontiffs to
> ask...that is the point. He vetoed the Megalesia once & then did
not
> hesitate without discussing it to do it again for the Ludi Plebei.
> Intemperate, I would say he needs more time to learn & appreciate
> Romanitas.
> Let him help me and run as a plebian aedile, we need to fill these
> posts and perhaps he will begin to understand the meaning of the
> Ludi & all the hard work.
> vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior TRP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40171 From: marcushoratius Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
Salve Fabi

No, indeed not. Rather it was you and Sulla who were at the time
trampling the laws of Nova Roma and upon the rights of cives. As I
recall, you posted to the ML that people gave up their rights when
they joined Nova Roma. I did not agree, and thus I ran for the office
of Tribunus Plebis to defend the rights of all cives. Do you wish to
visit old issues with me now? Or perhaps you wish to discuss more
recent events, such as the post by Caius Minucius Scaevola? When I
was Tribunus Plebis in 2001 I received several complaints, mostly from
women, but also from some men, that you were threatening them with
physical violence. Actually you were threatening physical violence on
the wives of those men. But then you were also posting to the ML back
then that you believed women should be beaten regularly. That went
along with your other statemente that all women should be denied the
right to vote in Nova Roma. Then while I was consul of SVR I received
similar complaints about your activities in Nova Roma. Some were even
comical. Did you really challenge Consul Caesar to a duel with
battleaxes, Fabi? And more recently, in conducting the census...
Since those emails were sent to me in my official capacity as head of
the Officina Census, they are public records, should you wish that I
post them for all cives to read what people have to say about you.
They do after all pertain to this year's issue as to why so many have
left Nova Roma. There is a pattern here, it seems to me, in how you
threaten people and in how you have abused your offices in the past.
Do you really wish to discuss old times with me, Fabi, or shall we
move on to discussing Nova Roma's future?

M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
Candidatus for Tribunus Plebis


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@a... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 12/2/2005 5:43:27 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> mhoratius@s... writes:
> Today I enter the Forum dressed in toga candida to humbly offer once
> more my experience and service to the Quirites Novae Romae as a
> candidate for the office of Tribunus Plebis.
> Did not you resign forn Nova Roma because you broke the law?
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40172 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Candiidates for QUAESTOR
Salve Candidates for Quaestor ( or anybody else for that matter)

As we have 10 good candidates for Quaestor and we can only elect 8 I was wondering if one or two of you would give some thought to running for either

AEDILIS PLEBIS, EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM, DIRIBITOR or CUSTOS

If you are a Plebian you can stand for any of the above offices and if you are a Patrician you can stand for all of them except AEDILIS PLEBIS. The Republic needs ALL offices filled and your willingness to drop out of the Quaestor race and run for one of these will be remembered by the electorate for a long time.


Vale


Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40173 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: The Fall of the Roman Empire New Book
Salve Romans

Has anybody read The Fall of the Roman Empire by Peter Heather?

Its published by Oxford University Press. If you have do you recommend it ?

The write up by my book club has as his central thesis that "regardless of any inherent structural, cultural or moral weakness the empire would have survived if the "devastating effects of the barbarian invasions had not taken place".

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40174 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
Salvete Piscine et Omnes:

ummm. Sad.

That's quite a pageful. If your remarks were not without
substantiation, you would not say such things as they would be
actionable, in NR and macronationally.

Quirites:

I am not trying to me a knight in shining armour here *VERY*
unRoman...but, it occurred to me, after reading this a few minutes
ago, that some citizens might still be experiencing a bad
situation..I don't know...I'm just saying that if there is anything
going on that you'd like to talk about, email me privately and I can
make arrangements to maybe chat via pod or phone.

I am not a professional social worker (anyone out there who is?) but
I can certainly listen. I know that very gesture...someone
listening...has helped me in the past to put things into perspective.

I don't want anyone hurt and bottling up stuff, being leary of
talking...thats NOT what NR is all about. I can listen and I don't
have any reason or desire to repeat stuff to anyone without your
permission.

Quite often you will find out that it is indeed *not* you, after
all, that is the cause of the problems.

Do *not* think that 'well, you know...what's the matter with
you???... " Yeah this is Rome, love it or leave it...we're not ever
going to get rid of this completely so put up with it"..... One
candidate for TRP implied this sentiment yesterday, and I agree. NR
is not ever going to be Plato's Eutopia but when it is a playground
for those who cause this degree of distress that it's not a love it
or leave it situation...it is an illegal, unhealthy, traumatizing
atmosphere which can cause alot of trauma and to boot, a rather ugly
reputation of our republic. AND....down the road, when and if we
get any money, we'll be sued.

Those who tell you to 'put up or shut up' dont' usually have
anything to worry about themselves...the can't identify with your
situation at all... Hey, nobody bothers them........they never
receive nastygrams and threats maybe....because maybe, just 'maybe'
they are part of the group that issues them ad lib? This has
certainly been the case more often than not. And those who issue
these kinds of statements, implying that the above behaviours are
the accepted NR experience, more or less,are people you might want
to consider NOT voting for, for your own happiness in the future.

I worry about the impuberes especially.

Be well,
Po

Pompeia Minucia Tiberia
Senatrix
Propraetrix Canada Orientalis
Nova Roma




In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@s...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Fabi
>
> No, indeed not. Rather it was you and Sulla who were at the time
> trampling the laws of Nova Roma and upon the rights of cives. As
I
> recall, you posted to the ML that people gave up their rights when
> they joined Nova Roma. I did not agree, and thus I ran for the
office
> of Tribunus Plebis to defend the rights of all cives. Do you wish
to
> visit old issues with me now? Or perhaps you wish to discuss more
> recent events, such as the post by Caius Minucius Scaevola? When
I
> was Tribunus Plebis in 2001 I received several complaints, mostly
from
> women, but also from some men, that you were threatening them with
> physical violence. Actually you were threatening physical
violence on
> the wives of those men. But then you were also posting to the ML
back
> then that you believed women should be beaten regularly. That
went
> along with your other statemente that all women should be denied
the
> right to vote in Nova Roma. Then while I was consul of SVR I
received
> similar complaints about your activities in Nova Roma. Some were
even
> comical. Did you really challenge Consul Caesar to a duel with
> battleaxes, Fabi? And more recently, in conducting the census...
> Since those emails were sent to me in my official capacity as head
of
> the Officina Census, they are public records, should you wish that
I
> post them for all cives to read what people have to say about
you.
> They do after all pertain to this year's issue as to why so many
have
> left Nova Roma. There is a pattern here, it seems to me, in how
you
> threaten people and in how you have abused your offices in the
past.
> Do you really wish to discuss old times with me, Fabi, or shall we
> move on to discussing Nova Roma's future?
>
> M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
> Candidatus for Tribunus Plebis
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@a... wrote:
> >
> > In a message dated 12/2/2005 5:43:27 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> > mhoratius@s... writes:
> > Today I enter the Forum dressed in toga candida to humbly offer
once
> > more my experience and service to the Quirites Novae Romae as a
> > candidate for the office of Tribunus Plebis.
> > Did not you resign forn Nova Roma because you broke the law?
> >
> > Q. Fabius Maximus
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40175 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: The Fall of the Roman Empire New Book
This has happened before and it is happening again.
Thanks for the info, I will be sure to buy it. And you
have my vote as you might have guessed.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <spqr753@...> wrote:
> Salve Romans
>
> Has anybody read The Fall of the Roman Empire by
Peter Heather?
>
> Its published by Oxford University Press. If you
have do you recommend it ?
>
> The write up by my book club has as his central
thesis that "regardless of any inherent structural,
cultural or moral weakness the empire would have
survived if the "devastating effects of the barbarian
invasions had not taken place".
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40176 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: #40174
Salvete Quirites:

The above post...sorry about the less than outstanding sentence
structure....paying more attention to the subject matter than the
mechanics, I guess.

I'll go slurp some more java.
Po
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40177 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
Any schmuck who proposes violence on women should be
feathered and stoned and @$!*%?! It is NOT funny. I
have seen this violence personified in Bosnia and
Kosovo as well as in the beloved city I now protect. I
dont always agree with women but thats why the gods
invented sports, ale and divorce. I can not believe
that in this day and age and amongst the great minds
in Nova Roma there can be such a monster. I cant
believe it.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
> Salvete Piscine et Omnes:
>
> ummm. Sad.
>
> That's quite a pageful. If your remarks were not
without
> substantiation, you would not say such things as
they would be
> actionable, in NR and macronationally.
>
> Quirites:
>
> I am not trying to me a knight in shining armour
here *VERY*
> unRoman...but, it occurred to me, after reading this
a few minutes
> ago, that some citizens might still be experiencing
a bad
> situation..I don't know...I'm just saying that if
there is anything
> going on that you'd like to talk about, email me
privately and I can
> make arrangements to maybe chat via pod or phone.
>
> I am not a professional social worker (anyone out
there who is?) but
> I can certainly listen. I know that very
gesture...someone
> listening...has helped me in the past to put things
into perspective.
>
> I don't want anyone hurt and bottling up stuff,
being leary of
> talking...thats NOT what NR is all about. I can
listen and I don't
> have any reason or desire to repeat stuff to anyone
without your
> permission.
>
> Quite often you will find out that it is indeed
*not* you, after
> all, that is the cause of the problems.
>
> Do *not* think that 'well, you know...what's the
matter with
> you???... " Yeah this is Rome, love it or leave
it...we're not ever
> going to get rid of this completely so put up with
it"..... One
> candidate for TRP implied this sentiment yesterday,
and I agree. NR
> is not ever going to be Plato's Eutopia but when it
is a playground
> for those who cause this degree of distress that
it's not a love it
> or leave it situation...it is an illegal, unhealthy,
traumatizing
> atmosphere which can cause alot of trauma and to
boot, a rather ugly
> reputation of our republic. AND....down the road,
when and if we
> get any money, we'll be sued.
>
> Those who tell you to 'put up or shut up' dont'
usually have
> anything to worry about themselves...the can't
identify with your
> situation at all... Hey, nobody bothers
them........they never
> receive nastygrams and threats maybe....because
maybe, just 'maybe'
> they are part of the group that issues them ad lib?
This has
> certainly been the case more often than not. And
those who issue
> these kinds of statements, implying that the above
behaviours are
> the accepted NR experience, more or less,are people
you might want
> to consider NOT voting for, for your own happiness
in the future.
>
> I worry about the impuberes especially.
>
> Be well,
> Po
>
> Pompeia Minucia Tiberia
> Senatrix
> Propraetrix Canada Orientalis
> Nova Roma
>
>
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius"
<mhoratius@s...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Fabi
> >
> > No, indeed not. Rather it was you and Sulla who
were at the time
> > trampling the laws of Nova Roma and upon the
rights of cives. As
> I
> > recall, you posted to the ML that people gave up
their rights when
> > they joined Nova Roma. I did not agree, and thus
I ran for the
> office
> > of Tribunus Plebis to defend the rights of all
cives. Do you wish
> to
> > visit old issues with me now? Or perhaps you wish
to discuss more
> > recent events, such as the post by Caius Minucius
Scaevola? When
> I
> > was Tribunus Plebis in 2001 I received several
complaints, mostly
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40178 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
On 12/3/05, raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@...> wrote:
>
> I
> dont always agree with women but thats why the gods
> invented sports, ale and divorce.


If that's meant to be funny - it falls way short of the mark for anyone with
even half a brain cell. And if it's not - then may all the Gods protect us
from such stupid, arrogant, patronising, mysoginist creeps.

Flavia Lucilla Merula


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40179 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Census, Resignations
Salve Gai Aureli,

Gaius Aurelius Scipio wrote:

> How does one apply for Praefect?

First you join the Sodalitas Militarium, as I see you've already done.
Then initiate some communication with Praefectus Audens, and let him
know that you'd like to take on the task.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40180 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Tribune Albucius For Tribune (QSP)
Salvete,

Although Trib. Albucius already answered this post, I would like to add my point of view
as a magistrate knowing Albucius rather well for having met him several times in person.

> Of course this did not deter Albucius from doing this again for > the
> Ludi Plebeii! What does this tell you about stubborness and a
> basic lack of respect for the Religio?

I can testify (but do I really need to do so?) that Trib. Albucius is a true Roman, very
respectful of his duties and a very hard worker. His dedication to Nova Roma and Gallia
is unquestionable. A few of his actions (actually only two) may sometimes be discussed as
borderline. Historically, in Roma Antiqua, some magistrates actually did forbid some
games. Emp. Augustus for example forbid the "munera sine missione". To my knowledge,
these magistrates never were considered as unrespectful to the Religio or the State.

> Suetonius Paulinus I really don't know how you can support
> Albucius
> who seems to learn nothing of Romanitas but interprets the
> Constitution like an EU lawyer.

"Like an EU lawyer"? What kind of discrimination is that? Is discrimination a Roman
feature?

Valete,



Sextus Apollonius Scipio

Propraetor Galliae



__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40181 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
As I suspected it would the tables have turned on me.
In my opinion it was a joke and how could it POSSIBLY
offend and leave me with half a brain cell? My point
is that is no excuse what so ever for a man to impose
any violence. We have outlets when talking it out just
doesnt cut it...I listed some outlets. That is
deserving of a put down and a plea to the immortals to
wipe the face of the earth of neanderthals like me?
Let me guess, you did not invite me to defend women
because you can do it yourself, right? Well my one
brain cell still tells me that it is better to enjoy
an ale rather than argue w/ my spouse or get divorced
if we are making each other miserable. I also stand by
my barbarian notion that a man that abuses a woman
should be crushed. I appologize to your sensibilites
that there are still militaristic vermin like myself
that feel the need to protect others. Maybe some day
the gods will grant your wish and get rid of vile
creatures like me. Again, I am sorry for taking womens
side.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<kirsteen.falconsfan@...> wrote:
> On 12/3/05, raymond fuentes
<praefectus2324@...> wrote:
> >
> > I
> > dont always agree with women but thats why the
gods
> > invented sports, ale and divorce.
>
>
> If that's meant to be funny - it falls way short of
the mark for anyone with
> even half a brain cell. And if it's not - then may
all the Gods protect us
> from such stupid, arrogant, patronising, mysoginist
creeps.
>
> Flavia Lucilla Merula
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40182 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
Salve, M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus; salvete, omnes.

On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 02:10:43PM -0000, marcushoratius wrote:
>
> Then while I was consul of SVR I received
> similar complaints about your activities in Nova Roma. Some were even
> comical. Did you really challenge Consul Caesar to a duel with
> battleaxes, Fabi? And more recently, in conducting the census...
> Since those emails were sent to me in my official capacity as head of
> the Officina Census, they are public records, should you wish that I
> post them for all cives to read what people have to say about you.
> They do after all pertain to this year's issue as to why so many have
> left Nova Roma.

Since they are public records, I would greatly appreciate it if you
could post either a URL or the files themselves. I would also be
grateful if you could post the links to the various violence-related
posts that Q. Fabius has made on the Main List.

I believe that these are of critical interest to all of Nova Roma -
since there's a chance, no matter how small, that this person with a
history of making violent threats will have access to everyone's private
records - and they are of critical interest to me personally, since they
are supporting evidence for the police, etc. in the case that I have
filed against this man.

Just to make myself crystal-clear: at this very moment, I consider my
case against Mr. Phenow to be at a stopping point (if only just before
the precipice) - chances are good that, psychotic as his actions in
making these threats may be, they are of minimal concern. However, if I
see him getting even close to being elected, I will consider it an issue
of public safety, and react accordingly.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Mendacem memorem esse oportet.
A liar needs a good memory.
-- Quintilianus, "De institutione oratoria"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40183 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
---Salvete Fides et Omnes:

Sir down Fides....I agree with you !:)

For what its worth, and I know you are likely going to run for
Oxygen at my saying this, but from your standpoint, I think I
understand what you are trying to say in this post, and that the
main gist is well-intentioned, and not intended as any kind of
slur, as I read it.

Valete
Po








In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@y...>
wrote:
>
> As I suspected it would the tables have turned on me.
> In my opinion it was a joke and how could it POSSIBLY
> offend and leave me with half a brain cell? My point
> is that is no excuse what so ever for a man to impose
> any violence. We have outlets when talking it out just
> doesnt cut it...I listed some outlets. That is
> deserving of a put down and a plea to the immortals to
> wipe the face of the earth of neanderthals like me?
> Let me guess, you did not invite me to defend women
> because you can do it yourself, right? Well my one
> brain cell still tells me that it is better to enjoy
> an ale rather than argue w/ my spouse or get divorced
> if we are making each other miserable. I also stand by
> my barbarian notion that a man that abuses a woman
> should be crushed. I appologize to your sensibilites
> that there are still militaristic vermin like myself
> that feel the need to protect others. Maybe some day
> the gods will grant your wish and get rid of vile
> creatures like me. Again, I am sorry for taking womens
> side.
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> <kirsteen.falconsfan@g...> wrote:
> > On 12/3/05, raymond fuentes
> <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > I
> > > dont always agree with women but thats why the
> gods
> > > invented sports, ale and divorce.
> >
> >
> > If that's meant to be funny - it falls way short of
> the mark for anyone with
> > even half a brain cell. And if it's not - then may
> all the Gods protect us
> > from such stupid, arrogant, patronising, mysoginist
> creeps.
> >
> > Flavia Lucilla Merula
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> >
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40184 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candiidates for QUAESTOR
Salve Pauline,

As I stated in my declaration for candidacy, I am running for the office of Quaestor because I was made aware of the fact that Nova Roma needed my services in that office. If Nova Roma feels that my services would be better served in any other capacity I am certainly willing to fill that capacity instead. The important thing, in my opinion is that the services provided by the magistrates of Nova Roma to its citizens continue smoothly into the next year, not whether I am in one position versus any other. Please feel free to change my declaration to whichever position I can serve best in as a Patrician.

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: Stephen Gallagher
To: Nova-Roma
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 9:26 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Candiidates for QUAESTOR


Salve Candidates for Quaestor ( or anybody else for that matter)

As we have 10 good candidates for Quaestor and we can only elect 8 I was wondering if one or two of you would give some thought to running for either

AEDILIS PLEBIS, EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM, DIRIBITOR or CUSTOS

If you are a Plebian you can stand for any of the above offices and if you are a Patrician you can stand for all of them except AEDILIS PLEBIS. The Republic needs ALL offices filled and your willingness to drop out of the Quaestor race and run for one of these will be remembered by the electorate for a long time.


Vale


Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The fall of the roman empire
Roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.11/191 - Release Date: 12/2/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40185 From: jerichomyles2002 Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Behavior in NR
Salvete, omnes

Having read recent emails, I felt compelled to say something regarding that which was
stated.

The honorable M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus wrote recently:

"...that you were threatening them with physical violence. Actually you were threatening
physical violence on the wives of those men..."

In reading through the website, I found a passage which speak of sovereignty of NR. One
of the lines I read stated:

"We will always respect the spirit and letter of the laws of the countries of which we are
citizens and in which we reside."

I was reluctant to speak at first, as I am not yet a full citizen of NR. But, I would feel
compelled to say something if this indeed had happened. To make threats of physical
violence is called assault (here in IL). Threatened physical violence that implies a deadly
weapon is aggravated assault. In both situations they are felony crimes.

If we preport to uphold the letter of the law in the countries in which we live, the individual
making such statements is in violation of those laws. If such person willing breaks the
laws of his own country, what will he do to the laws of NR?

I do not believe, such action or behavior should be tolerated by anyone, NR citizen or not.
I hope that in the future, such individuals will be quickly and severly dealt with. We do not
need individuals who would stoop to such levels within the citizenry of NR.

Valete,

Quintus Grattius Acacius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40186 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
A. Apollonius C. Equitio omnibusque sal.

> First I would like to applaud the consul for placing
> before the People
> something to at least debate.

Likewise.

> I would like to comment (I know, big surprise) on
> the body of the
> proposed law. As it is well known, I am in favor of
> the immediate
> effect of a resignation; the proposed law, however,
> does not take into
> consideration the law which currently exists.

It takes the current law fully into consideration.
This is the reason for the slightly odd wording. I
quote the text again to refresh our memories:

> I. A magistrate who resigns his magistracy shall
> immediately and irrevocably cease to hold that
> magistracy.
>
> II. A magistrate who announces his resignation of
> citizenship shall immediately and irrevocably cease
> to hold any and all his magistracies.
>
> III. A magistrate who resigns his magistracy and
> later changes his or her mind, may stand as a
candidate
> in the election to fill the vacancy without penalty.

You'll notice that article II would much more
naturally be written as "A magistrate who resigns his
citizenship shall immediately and irrevocably...", but
if it said that then your concern would be
well-founded. Let me recap, though you know it well,
the reason we are in the mess which this proposal
seeks to tidy up. The lex Cornelia Maria states that
if a citizen announces his resignation of citizenship
and then, within nine days, revokes that announcement,
then the law considers that he never at any time
resigned his citizenship at all. The same lex also
says that a citizen who resigns his citizenship also
loses his offices. Some argue, and not without logic,
that if a citizen who reconsiders within nine days is
not considered to have resigned at all, then there has
been no resignation, and therefore his offices are not
lost.

This, then, is all sorted out quite simply by the
wording of the proposed article II: "A magistrate *who
announces his resignation of citizenship* shall
immediately and irrevocably cease to hold any and all
of his magistracies". This completely bypasses the
vexed question of whether the resignation of
citizenship occurs at all, because the loss of
magistracy will no longer occur at the time he resigns
his citizenship but at the time he *announces* his
resignation of citizenship. In other words, he loses
all his magistracies as soon as the words "I resign"
are out of his mouth, regardless what the law may be
concerning citizenship.

Certainly your proposal would achieve much the same
effect, but it has one great disadvantage compared to
the lex Popillia as proposed. Your wording
incorporates the desired change into the lex Cornelia
Maria; the proposed lex Popillia simply bypasses the
latter. Why does the difference matter? The difference
matters because the lex Cornelia Maria itself is the
subject of considerable dispute on two different
levels. First, there is dispute about its proper
interpretation; second, there is dispute about whether
it is a good idea at all. I consider it highly likely
that within the next couple of years there will be at
least an attempt to clarify, amend, repeal, or replace
the core of the lex Cornelia Maria, namely its
nine-day period of grace for resignation of
citizenship. Any amendment incorporated into the lex
Cornelia Maria to deal with resignation of office
will, at best, be swallowed up in that argument or, at
worst, be itself thrown into doubt and confusion as
people try to use it to interpret the rest of the lex
Cornelia Maria and vice versa.

The proposed lex Popillia, by contrast, would stand on
its own and would remain clear, simple, and reliable
law regardless of the fate of the lex Cornelia Maria.
If the lex Cornelia Maria remains on the books as it
is, the lex Popillia will be unaffected; if it gets
amended or repealed, the lex Popillia will still be
unaffected; if it becomes the centre of a perpetual
maelstrom of interpretive argument, the lex Popillia
will stand on its own, stating in clear and simply
words the law concerning resignation of office.

I would note, finally, that this is the way Romans
have always preferred to legislate. They were not in
the habit of inserting new sections into old leges. If
something needed to be fixed, they simply enacted a
new lex which dealt with that specific problem. This
is what is proposed here. It is not a proposal which
allows itself to be distracted or bogged down. It is
not a proposal which seeks to overhaul an entire area
of law. It is a proposal which identifies a problem,
fixes that problem, then goes home to plough its
fields. I hope you and the rest of the populus will
support it.



___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Model Search 2005 - Find the next catwalk superstars - http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/model-search/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40187 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
On 12/3/05, raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@...> wrote:
>
> As I suspected it would the tables have turned on me.


So, if you suspected this - you must have realised it would offend some of
us. I guess that must have been your intention?

In my opinion it was a joke and how could it POSSIBLY
> offend and leave me with half a brain cell?


If that question is genuine - then you REALLY don't understand the first
thing about women do you?

My point
> is that is no excuse what so ever for a man to impose
> any violence. We have outlets when talking it out just
> doesnt cut it...I listed some outlets.


I tend to agree with the first part 'no excuse' As for 'when talking it out
just doesn't cut it' As a counselor might I suggest that a radical solution
might be to 'listen' instead of 'talk'. You never know it migh be far more
productive than running away. at the very least you might actually learn
something about women.

That is
> deserving of a put down and a plea to the immortals to
> wipe the face of the earth of neanderthals like me?


I'm surprised you think so - I never suggested anything like that. I wonder
if you've got a guilty conscience.

Let me guess, you did not invite me to defend women
> because you can do it yourself, right?


I didn't invite you to defend me because I don't know you though I have
to admit I've read some of your posts before. There are many situations in
life I can defend myself against. I couldn't do my job if I couldn't ( I
work with men experiencing homelessness with drug, alcohol and mental health
issues). I have never had the hubris to suggest I can defend myself from
everything but, if requesting help, I'm dammed particular who I ask, always
being wary of frying pan and fire situations.

Well my one
> brain cell still tells me that it is better to enjoy
> an ale rather than argue w/ my spouse or get divorced
> if we are making each other miserable.


Of course, listening to someone else's point of view and trying to work
things out wouldn't enter into it?

I also stand by
> my barbarian notion that a man that abuses a woman
> should be crushed.


Did I say it was barbarian?

I appologize to your sensibilites
> that there are still militaristic vermin like myself
> that feel the need to protect others.


'Fraid i don't have that many sensibilities. Makes me sound like something
out of Jane Austen. Believe it or not women have progressed from those
days. Funnily enough mostly without the help of mysoginists :-)

Maybe some day
> the gods will grant your wish and get rid of vile
> creatures like me.


Again you seem to be very much on the defensive here I wonder why you keep
suggesting I've said things I didn't. and whle on the subject of 'ale,
sports and divorce' I quite like a good traditionally brewed ale, not the
insipid mass produced stuff, but really prefer a good Islay single malt, I'm
a massive rugby fan (my email tells you which team I support :-) and I've
cheerfully divorced two men and remained very good friends with both of
them. So I'd suggest if the gods invented ale, sports and divorce, it was
as much for our good as yours :-)

Again, I am sorry for taking womens
> side.


As we say in the parlance of my native city "Yeah right!" (Don't you just
love the double positive?)

Flavia Lucilla Merula


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40188 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Census records and assumptions of privacy
Salvete omnes, et salve Scaevola,

Earlier, M. Horatius wrote:

>>Since those emails were sent to me in my official capacity as head of
>>the Officina Census, they are public records, should you wish that I
>>post them for all cives to read what people have to say about you.
>>They do after all pertain to this year's issue as to why so many have
>>left Nova Roma.

Caius Minucius Scaevola replied:
> Since they are public records, I would greatly appreciate it if you
> could post either a URL or the files themselves.

I think that Horatius erred in his statement that replies to the census
are matters of public record. In Nova Roma communications with the
censors have always enjoyed an assumption of privacy. I have already
written privately to Horatius and my colleague Quintilianus about this
matter, but since things seem to be heating up in public I feel the need
to interpose my Censorial authority here.

Unless a citizen or former citizen has given explicit permission for
their communications to the censors office to be made public, I will not
allow such communications to be made public. I will, if necessary, use
all options available to me under law to insure this.

This is not to excuse the actions of Q. Fabius Maximus, which I consider
deplorable. Rather, it is to preserve the privacy rights of others, who
I suspect were communicating with an assumption of privacy.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40189 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: The Fall of the Roman Empire New Book
A. Apollonius Ti. Galerio omnibusque sal.

> Has anybody read The Fall of the Roman Empire by
> Peter Heather?
>
> Its published by Oxford University Press. If you
> have do you recommend it ?
>
> The write up by my book club has as his central
> thesis that "regardless of any inherent structural,
> cultural or moral weakness the empire would have
> survived if the "devastating effects of the
> barbarian invasions had not taken place".

I can't be as helpful as I'd like, because regrettably
I haven't had the spare cash to buy the book, but I
would expect the book to be well worth reading. Peter
Heather is a very interesting fellow, and I rather
wish I had talked to him more when he supervised my
undergraduate thesis. He's done a lot of work on the
late Roman empire, particularly following in the
footsteps of the late E. A. Thompson by concentrating
on the impact of the Goths and the Huns.

I suspect a large part of the book is probably a
development of a seminal article he wrote some years
ago which reconstructed the movements of successive
waves of barbarian peoples on the north-eastern
frontier of the empire, and he's certainly been at the
forefront of a school of thought which has emphasised
the importance of these invaders, countering the more
fashionable view that the empire collapsed primarily
from internal decay.

It would be going too far to recommend the book
without reading it, but I'd certainly expect it to be
worth reading. His style is lively and readable, and
he's one of those relatively rare people who can speak
clearly to non-specialists from a position at the
cutting edge of academic research.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40190 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Damaging practices in social fora
Avete, quirites.

I have a few thoughts that pertain to the issues that have come up here
recently - citizen retention, threats issued on the ML, etc. - and
perhaps see a thread that ties them together. I offer them here in the
hope that others will find them useful.

In my long experience of Internet fora, I've noted a number of group
behaviors and beliefs - some of them highly damaging - that are common
across the range. Groups that survive and thrive, unless they are
explicitly aware of these, do so by accident, and only to the degree to
which they manage to control or mitigate the damage; groups that fail to
do so inevitably die off.

Recently, I ran across a web page in which the author seems to have
drawn some of the same conclusions as I have in this regard. He has also
done something that I haven't: organizing the material in a short,
readable, engaging form. I invite everyone here to take a look at this
page, and consider how these points may apply to the situation in Nova
Roma - and to certain members of this group, as well as our practices in
retaining these members.

http://sean.chittenden.org/humor/www.plausiblydeniable.com/opinion/gsf.html

Even if no action is taken as a result, I still believe that being aware
of these issues can only benefit us as a group - as a factor to be taken
into future considerations, if nothing else.


Valete, quirites -
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Faber est suae quisque fortunae.
Every man is the artisan of his own fortune.
-- Appius Claudius Caecus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40191 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Census records and assumptions of privacy
Salve Censor Gnaeus Equitius Marinus who said in part

"Unless a citizen or former citizen has given explicit permission for
their communications to the censors office to be made public, I will not
allow such communications to be made public. I will, if necessary, use
all options available to me under law to insure this."

Well said

Thank you Censor

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus<mailto:gawne@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 3:33 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Census records and assumptions of privacy


Salvete omnes, et salve Scaevola,

Earlier, M. Horatius wrote:

>>Since those emails were sent to me in my official capacity as head of
>>the Officina Census, they are public records, should you wish that I
>>post them for all cives to read what people have to say about you.
>>They do after all pertain to this year's issue as to why so many have
>>left Nova Roma.

Caius Minucius Scaevola replied:
> Since they are public records, I would greatly appreciate it if you
> could post either a URL or the files themselves.

I think that Horatius erred in his statement that replies to the census
are matters of public record. In Nova Roma communications with the
censors have always enjoyed an assumption of privacy. I have already
written privately to Horatius and my colleague Quintilianus about this
matter, but since things seem to be heating up in public I feel the need
to interpose my Censorial authority here.

Unless a citizen or former citizen has given explicit permission for
their communications to the censors office to be made public, I will not
allow such communications to be made public. I will, if necessary, use
all options available to me under law to insure this.

This is not to excuse the actions of Q. Fabius Maximus, which I consider
deplorable. Rather, it is to preserve the privacy rights of others, who
I suspect were communicating with an assumption of privacy.

Valete,

-- Marinus


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40192 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Census records and assumptions of privacy
Vale, Marinus Censor; valete, omnes.

On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 12:33:12PM -0800, Bill Gawne wrote:
> Salvete omnes, et salve Scaevola,
>
> Earlier, M. Horatius wrote:
>
> >>Since those emails were sent to me in my official capacity as head of
> >>the Officina Census, they are public records, should you wish that I
> >>post them for all cives to read what people have to say about you.
> >>They do after all pertain to this year's issue as to why so many have
> >>left Nova Roma.
>
> Caius Minucius Scaevola replied:
> > Since they are public records, I would greatly appreciate it if you
> > could post either a URL or the files themselves.
>
> I think that Horatius erred in his statement that replies to the census
> are matters of public record. In Nova Roma communications with the
> censors have always enjoyed an assumption of privacy.

Thank you for the clarification. That is, indeed a reasonable assumption
- seen in that light, those records should not be exposed to the public.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Caelum, non animum mutant, qui trans mare currunt.
The sky, and not his soul, changes the one who runs across the sea.
-- Horace, "Epistulae"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40193 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Behavior in NR (QFM)
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "jerichomyles2002"
<jerichomyles2002@y...> wrote:
>
Salvete Quinte Gratti et omnes,

I know NR has mechanisms for taking care of people that threaten.
About 2.5 years ago we had some fellow from Germania living in the
states who came on the list, got his citizenship and claiming
he was a direct descendent from the Caesars, demanded to be made a
senator right away. Many citizens rightly scoffed at this and one
citizen told him that his claims about his lineage were complete
nonsense (a more colorful phrase was used). He then lost it and
threatened to kill this fellow for mouthing off about his family.
The censors quickly issued him a "nota", he was more or less
ostracized and that was the last we heard.

With regards to QFM, I would say people her should be very careful.
I am "not" saying or denying that people did not have problems or
big fights with him in the past as mentioned but in America and
western Europe most people are deemed to be innocent until "proven"
guilty. I know there are things on these lists about this citizen
but are there any records of official notas being issued, suspension
of citizenship or especially a macro court trial where he was
convicted? Documented accusations and official compaints without
trial and conviction will not cut it and anyway Censor Marinus just
indicated that such complaint records are not easily released .We
should cautious on what is said and posted in future. If you detest
the man or have doubts then do not vote for him.

Personally, regardless of what people say and feel, even my closest
friends and family, I prefer to take people at face value until they
show me something otherwise and believe me, "I told you so" has
happened to me a lot." Nevertheless I like to see for myself before
writing a person off. These QFM problems happened before my time in
and I am sad to see that some of my colleagues and friends face this
dilemma with him. However, from my personal perspective I see that
QFM has stayed here through thick and thin, is very knowledgeable in
Roman culture and NR, held many offices and has always been helpful,
polite and respectful to me even when we disagreed with issues...
even in the back alley at that.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups











> Salvete, omnes
>
> Having read recent emails, I felt compelled to say something
regarding that which was
> stated.
>
> The honorable M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus wrote recently:
>
> "...that you were threatening them with physical violence.
Actually you were threatening
> physical violence on the wives of those men..."
>
> In reading through the website, I found a passage which speak of
sovereignty of NR. One
> of the lines I read stated:
>
> "We will always respect the spirit and letter of the laws of the
countries of which we are
> citizens and in which we reside."
>
> I was reluctant to speak at first, as I am not yet a full citizen
of NR. But, I would feel
> compelled to say something if this indeed had happened. To make
threats of physical
> violence is called assault (here in IL). Threatened physical
violence that implies a deadly
> weapon is aggravated assault. In both situations they are felony
crimes.
>
> If we preport to uphold the letter of the law in the countries in
which we live, the individual
> making such statements is in violation of those laws. If such
person willing breaks the
> laws of his own country, what will he do to the laws of NR?
>
> I do not believe, such action or behavior should be tolerated by
anyone, NR citizen or not.
> I hope that in the future, such individuals will be quickly and
severly dealt with. We do not
> need individuals who would stoop to such levels within the
citizenry of NR.
>
> Valete,
>
> Quintus Grattius Acacius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40194 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: The Fall of the Roman Empire New Book
Salve A. Apollonius Cordus

Thanks for the information which as always is timely and informed.

I have add it to my wish list.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


----- Original Message -----
From: A. Apollonius Cordus<mailto:a_apollonius_cordus@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] The Fall of the Roman Empire New Book


A. Apollonius Ti. Galerio omnibusque sal.

> Has anybody read The Fall of the Roman Empire by
> Peter Heather?
>
> Its published by Oxford University Press. If you
> have do you recommend it ?
>
> The write up by my book club has as his central
> thesis that "regardless of any inherent structural,
> cultural or moral weakness the empire would have
> survived if the "devastating effects of the
> barbarian invasions had not taken place".

I can't be as helpful as I'd like, because regrettably
I haven't had the spare cash to buy the book, but I
would expect the book to be well worth reading. Peter
Heather is a very interesting fellow, and I rather
wish I had talked to him more when he supervised my
undergraduate thesis. He's done a lot of work on the
late Roman empire, particularly following in the
footsteps of the late E. A. Thompson by concentrating
on the impact of the Goths and the Huns.

I suspect a large part of the book is probably a
development of a seminal article he wrote some years
ago which reconstructed the movements of successive
waves of barbarian peoples on the north-eastern
frontier of the empire, and he's certainly been at the
forefront of a school of thought which has emphasised
the importance of these invaders, countering the more
fashionable view that the empire collapsed primarily
from internal decay.

It would be going too far to recommend the book
without reading it, but I'd certainly expect it to be
worth reading. His style is lively and readable, and
he's one of those relatively rare people who can speak
clearly to non-specialists from a position at the
cutting edge of academic research.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com<http://uk.security.yahoo.com/>


SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ> Fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA> The fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ>
Roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40195 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
C. Equitius Cato A. Apollonio Cordo quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@y...> wrote:
It is a proposal which identifies a problem,
> fixes that problem, then goes home to plough its
> fields. I hope you and the rest of the populus will
> support it.


Thank you for the clarification. Yes, I will :-)

Vale et valete.

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40196 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candiidates for QUAESTOR
Salve -

On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 12:18:26PM -0500, Sensei Phil Perez wrote:
> Salve Pauline,
>
> As I stated in my declaration for candidacy, I am running for the
> office of Quaestor because I was made aware of the fact that Nova Roma
> needed my services in that office. If Nova Roma feels that my services
> would be better served in any other capacity I am certainly willing to
> fill that capacity instead. The important thing, in my opinion is that
> the services provided by the magistrates of Nova Roma to its citizens
> continue smoothly into the next year, not whether I am in one position
> versus any other. Please feel free to change my declaration to
> whichever position I can serve best in as a Patrician.

I applaud your attitude, Marce Cassi; however, you're the only one who
knows what the best match would be for your skills and preferences. I
urge you to consider the open positions and choose one that you would
most enjoy doing - since, in my experience, this is what brings the
greatest benefit both to the person volunteering their effort _and_ the
organization.

http://novaroma.org/bin/election

If you choose one, please let me know and I will switch your candidacy
to the new position.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Concordia parvae res crescunt, discordia maximae dilabuntur.
Through unity the small thing grows, through disunity the largest thing crumbles.
-- Sallust, "Jugurtha"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40197 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Off a Bit
Salvete omnes,

I am off to work now in the barbarian wilderness once again. I'll be
out there for 7 - 9 days but it looks like I'll have internet just the
same and will keep in touch when not too busy. Thank the gods for the
Satellites and pray that Censor Marinus keeps his flying!

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40198 From: marciusfelix Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candiidates for QUAESTOR
Salve Tiberius Galerius Paulinus et Salvate Omnibus,

This is my first participation and would like to start for the
Quaestor position, but I am ready to serve where it will be more
necessary in this way I am the Nova Roma disposal.

Vale et Valete.
Titus Marcius Felix



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@m...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Candidates for Quaestor ( or anybody else for that matter)
>
> As we have 10 good candidates for Quaestor and we can only elect 8
I was wondering if one or two of you would give some thought to
running for either
>
> AEDILIS PLEBIS, EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM, DIRIBITOR or CUSTOS
>
> If you are a Plebian you can stand for any of the above offices and
if you are a Patrician you can stand for all of them except AEDILIS
PLEBIS. The Republic needs ALL offices filled and your willingness to
drop out of the Quaestor race and run for one of these will be
remembered by the electorate for a long time.
>
>
> Vale
>
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40199 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Eheu..... Hortensia (my candidacy)
C. Equitius Cato P. Memmio Albucio quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve tribune et salvete omnes.

Memmius Albucius is one of the kindest, most decent and honest men I
have had the good fortune to meet. I believe that he operates always
with a concern for the laws and Constitution of the Republic in mind,
whether or not anyone agrees with him. I can certainly empathize :-)

At the same time, I would ask that he reconsider running for a second
tribunate. It was one of the most basic principles of the republican
constitution that no one should hold the same office in successive
years, and that was especially true of the tribunate. Licinius
and Sextius held successive tribunates in the fourth century B.C., but
that was at the end of the struggle of the orders and they laid down
their office once they had put in place the final stones of the new
patricio-plebeian constitution. The first person after them to run for
tribune twice in a row was Ti. Gracchus, and it was that act more than
anything else which precipitated the collapse of the constitutional
order Licinius and Sextius had created. Gracchus and his opponent
Octavius between them had already broken just about every traditional
restraint on tribunician power, and all that remained was the
principle of annual tenure. Once that was broken, it became clear
that a tribune who could renew his sacrosanctity every year could
effectively make himself king as long as his popularity held.

So, Albucius, in all possible amity, I would encourage you to instead
move on to the aedileship, which is in need of another candidate. I
think you would agree that it is exceedingly important to keep the
correct form of the government.

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40200 From: Sensei Phil Perez Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Damaging practices in social fora
Salve Scaevola

Damn it, I saw all 5 fallacies in me @#%*! Oh well, maybe Flavia Lucilla Merula can squeeze me in as a client. I need a doze of "feminine" psychological abuse to bring me back to my normal knuckle dragging Suburite Neanderthal mentality ;-) Flavius need some company - Damn, there I go again into my Geek Fallacies!!!

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus

PS: That was a joke Merulla - I luv ya!


----- Original Message -----
From: Benjamin A. Okopnik
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 12:50 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Damaging practices in social fora


Avete, quirites.

I have a few thoughts that pertain to the issues that have come up here
recently - citizen retention, threats issued on the ML, etc. - and
perhaps see a thread that ties them together. I offer them here in the
hope that others will find them useful.

In my long experience of Internet fora, I've noted a number of group
behaviors and beliefs - some of them highly damaging - that are common
across the range. Groups that survive and thrive, unless they are
explicitly aware of these, do so by accident, and only to the degree to
which they manage to control or mitigate the damage; groups that fail to
do so inevitably die off.

Recently, I ran across a web page in which the author seems to have
drawn some of the same conclusions as I have in this regard. He has also
done something that I haven't: organizing the material in a short,
readable, engaging form. I invite everyone here to take a look at this
page, and consider how these points may apply to the situation in Nova
Roma - and to certain members of this group, as well as our practices in
retaining these members.

http://sean.chittenden.org/humor/www.plausiblydeniable.com/opinion/gsf.html

Even if no action is taken as a result, I still believe that being aware
of these issues can only benefit us as a group - as a factor to be taken
into future considerations, if nothing else.


Valete, quirites -
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Faber est suae quisque fortunae.
Every man is the artisan of his own fortune.
-- Appius Claudius Caecus


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.11/191 - Release Date: 12/2/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40201 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Census records and assumptions of privacy
--- Salve Minucius Scaevola et Salve Equitius Marinus Censor:

I agree with the Censors' appraisal in that it is reasonable to
expect a release of off-list communications containing statements
about others. It is appropriate to suppose that in some cases, the
authors of such communication expect that their statements will be
handled with caution.

I know that I myself have signed releases of information in the
transfer of the most basic data involved in professional
consultations...so I think this is a good practise and avoids any
bad feelings that we are trying to undo. Lets not commit unjustice
in our pursuit of justice, for sure.

I would imagine though, in some cases, that such releases are rather
obtainable, as when one writes to declare reasons for leaving and
not returning as being directly attributable to being threatened or
otherwise harassed by violent discourse, they are maybe not worried
about sharing such info. They are likely not worried about violent
discourse or threats of retribution for their recent revelations,
because, well...they've already received those, haven't they?

In any case, I agree with the Censor's reasoning.

Now, posts which are reforwarded from the archives of the main Nova
Roma forum cannot, in my view, be regarded as confidential. They
are archives which can be accessed by any citizen/subscriber to this
list. Many of our posts appear on the WWW via search engine, in
fact.


I think enough has been said today to infer that there is a
behaviour problem meriting some closer examination, and that such
documentation exists to the Censors office.

And that is why I am sure the civites will be giving serious
consideration to whom they vote for Censor.... a magistrate who will
have access to our private information and we of course need a
magistrate we can safely entrust to the careful and virtuous use of
such information.



Valete
Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Benjamin A. Okopnik" <ben@l...> wrote:
>
> Vale, Marinus Censor; valete, omnes.
>
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 12:33:12PM -0800, Bill Gawne wrote:
> > Salvete omnes, et salve Scaevola,
> >
> > Earlier, M. Horatius wrote:
> >
> > >>Since those emails were sent to me in my official capacity as
head of
> > >>the Officina Census, they are public records, should you wish
that I
> > >>post them for all cives to read what people have to say about
you.
> > >>They do after all pertain to this year's issue as to why so
many have
> > >>left Nova Roma.
> >
> > Caius Minucius Scaevola replied:
> > > Since they are public records, I would greatly appreciate it
if you
> > > could post either a URL or the files themselves.
> >
> > I think that Horatius erred in his statement that replies to the
census
> > are matters of public record. In Nova Roma communications with
the
> > censors have always enjoyed an assumption of privacy.
>
> Thank you for the clarification. That is, indeed a reasonable
assumption
> - seen in that light, those records should not be exposed to the
public.
>
>
> Valete,
> Caius Minucius Scaevola
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-
> Caelum, non animum mutant, qui trans mare currunt.
> The sky, and not his soul, changes the one who runs across the sea.
> -- Horace, "Epistulae"
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40202 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candiidates for QUAESTOR
Salve Titus Marcius Felix

Iam not sayingyou should not run for Quaestor but to take a moment and look at the other offices that we need to fill. Do you think you could put together a monthly online newsletter?

If you do then you might me the right person to serve as EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: marciusfelix<mailto:marciusfelix@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 1:03 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Candiidates for QUAESTOR


Salve Tiberius Galerius Paulinus et Salvate Omnibus,

This is my first participation and would like to start for the
Quaestor position, but I am ready to serve where it will be more
necessary in this way I am the Nova Roma disposal.

Vale et Valete.
Titus Marcius Felix



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@m...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Candidates for Quaestor ( or anybody else for that matter)
>
> As we have 10 good candidates for Quaestor and we can only elect 8
I was wondering if one or two of you would give some thought to
running for either
>
> AEDILIS PLEBIS, EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM, DIRIBITOR or CUSTOS
>
> If you are a Plebian you can stand for any of the above offices and
if you are a Patrician you can stand for all of them except AEDILIS
PLEBIS. The Republic needs ALL offices filled and your willingness to
drop out of the Quaestor race and run for one of these will be
remembered by the electorate for a long time.
>
>
> Vale
>
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>









------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40203 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Damaging practices in social fora
On 12/3/05, Sensei Phil Perez <senseiphil@...> wrote:
>
>
> PS: That was a joke Merulla - I luv ya!



LOL. Believe it or not, I gathered that - that it was a joke I mean. Your
sentiments I wouldn't dare comment on :-)

Merulla


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40204 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candiidates for QUAESTOR
---Salve Marcius Felix;

Indeed! There are other offices but if running for Quaestor is what
you'd truly like to do, then, if you meet the qualification
criteria, then go for it.

Vale,
Po


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tim Gallagher" <spqr753@m...> wrote:
>
> Salve Titus Marcius Felix
>
> Iam not sayingyou should not run for Quaestor but to take a moment
and look at the other offices that we need to fill. Do you think you
could put together a monthly online newsletter?
>
> If you do then you might me the right person to serve as EDITOR
COMMENTARIORUM.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: marciusfelix<mailto:marciusfelix@y...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 1:03 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Candiidates for QUAESTOR
>
>
> Salve Tiberius Galerius Paulinus et Salvate Omnibus,
>
> This is my first participation and would like to start for the
> Quaestor position, but I am ready to serve where it will be more
> necessary in this way I am the Nova Roma disposal.
>
> Vale et Valete.
> Titus Marcius Felix
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-
Roma@yahoogroups.com>, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@m...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Candidates for Quaestor ( or anybody else for that
matter)
> >
> > As we have 10 good candidates for Quaestor and we can only
elect 8
> I was wondering if one or two of you would give some thought to
> running for either
> >
> > AEDILIS PLEBIS, EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM, DIRIBITOR or CUSTOS
> >
> > If you are a Plebian you can stand for any of the above
offices and
> if you are a Patrician you can stand for all of them except
AEDILIS
> PLEBIS. The Republic needs ALL offices filled and your
willingness to
> drop out of the Quaestor race and run for one of these will be
> remembered by the electorate for a long time.
> >
> >
> > Vale
> >
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-
Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-
unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40205 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Eheu..... Hortensia (my candidacy)
Salve Romans

C. Equitius Cato said in part

"So, Albucius, in all possible amity, I would encourage you to instead
move on to the Aedileship, which is in need of another candidate. I
think you would agree that it is exceedingly important to keep the
correct form of the government."

As much as I like Memmius Albucius as a person I would like to join C. Equitius Cato in respectfully requesting that you move you candidacy to that of the Aedileship. You will do an immense service to Nova Roma by this act and only increase your Dignitas and show the true meaning of Gravitas.

Please P Memmius Albucius stand for the Plebian Aedileship.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus





----- Original Message -----
From: gaiusequitiuscato<mailto:mlcinnyc@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 2:14 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Eheu..... Hortensia (my candidacy)


C. Equitius Cato P. Memmio Albucio quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve tribune et salvete omnes.

Memmius Albucius is one of the kindest, most decent and honest men I
have had the good fortune to meet. I believe that he operates always
with a concern for the laws and Constitution of the Republic in mind,
whether or not anyone agrees with him. I can certainly empathize :-)

At the same time, I would ask that he reconsider running for a second
tribunate. It was one of the most basic principles of the republican
constitution that no one should hold the same office in successive
years, and that was especially true of the tribunate. Licinius
and Sextius held successive tribunates in the fourth century B.C., but
that was at the end of the struggle of the orders and they laid down
their office once they had put in place the final stones of the new
patricio-plebeian constitution. The first person after them to run for
tribune twice in a row was Ti. Gracchus, and it was that act more than
anything else which precipitated the collapse of the constitutional
order Licinius and Sextius had created. Gracchus and his opponent
Octavius between them had already broken just about every traditional
restraint on tribunician power, and all that remained was the
principle of annual tenure. Once that was broken, it became clear
that a tribune who could renew his sacrosanctity every year could
effectively make himself king as long as his popularity held.

So, Albucius, in all possible amity, I would encourage you to instead
move on to the aedileship, which is in need of another candidate. I
think you would agree that it is exceedingly important to keep the
correct form of the government.

Vale et valete,

Cato






SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ> Fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA> The fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ>
Roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40206 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Gaius Geminius Germanus for Praetor
Salve, Citizens of Nova Roma !

I come before you once more, to ask for your support and vote for the office of Praetor. I respectfully recommend

Gaius Geminius Germanus to the electorate for election as Praetor.

I have had the honor of serving with Gaius Geminius Germanus as a follow Quaestor this year and have found it an enjoyable and rewarding experience.

He has served as Quaestor this year to the Honorable Praetor Marcus Iulius Perusianus. This experience as well as his past service to the Praetor's office as a scriba will serve him and Nova Roma well.

Gaius Geminius Germanus has been a citizens of Nova Roma for since 2754 and has served Nova Roma as a Lictor for almost all that time. He is also serving as a scriba to our Curule Aedile Lucius Iulius Sulla. I know that he will work as diligently as Praetor as he has in the other magistracies you have entrusted to his care.

As colleagues Gaius Geminius Germanus and I will endeavor to fulfill the constitutional duty to "administer the law " in a judicial and unbiased manner and will monitor the main list of Nova Roma in the same way. We will do so without regard to individuals and will strive to apply the law equally .

As Praetor Gaius Geminius Germanus will endeavor to perform all other duties of his office according to the best of his abilities and understanding and in adherence to the Constitution, and laws of Nova Roma .

I know that Gaius Geminius Germanus will continue to maintain the highest integrity and dedication to the welfare of Nova Roma and her citizens.

I again ask for your support in this election effort

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Candidate for Praetor



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40207 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Behavior in NR (QFM)
Salve, Quintus Suetonius Paulinus amice; salvete, omnes.

On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 06:25:18PM -0000, Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) wrote:
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "jerichomyles2002"
> <jerichomyles2002@y...> wrote:
> >
> Salvete Quinte Gratti et omnes,
>
> I know NR has mechanisms for taking care of people that threaten.

Actually, NR doesn't. How is NR supposed to stop someone from coming
over to your house and beating you up?

Pauline, I think you what you meant was that NR has mechanisms that work
on _civilized_ people, for _civilized_ purposes - or at least for the
purposes of the group. I think that this assumption does you a lot of
credit, because it shows you to be a decent human being... but it breaks
down where that assumption of civilization fails.

To me, anyone who *initiates* violence against another is a criminal, an
animal outside the bounds of civilization. Yes, measures taken against
them still have to abide by a standard of decency and mercy - but that
decency and that mercy must be primarily directed toward those that have
been harmed, and only secondarily toward the offender and only if chance
offers.

> About 2.5 years ago we had some fellow from Germania living in the
> states who came on the list, got his citizenship and claiming
> he was a direct descendent from the Caesars, demanded to be made a
> senator right away. Many citizens rightly scoffed at this and one
> citizen told him that his claims about his lineage were complete
> nonsense (a more colorful phrase was used). He then lost it and
> threatened to kill this fellow for mouthing off about his family.
> The censors quickly issued him a "nota", he was more or less
> ostracized and that was the last we heard.

And if the fellow from Germania _had_ killed whoever it was that scoffed
at him? In what light would you have considered the effectiveness of
that nota?

> With regards to QFM, I would say people her should be very careful.
> I am "not" saying or denying that people did not have problems or
> big fights with him in the past as mentioned but in America and
> western Europe most people are deemed to be innocent until "proven"
> guilty. I know there are things on these lists about this citizen
> but are there any records of official notas being issued, suspension
> of citizenship or especially a macro court trial where he was
> convicted?

What would be the point? Yes, I could prosecute Q. Fabius in an NR
court. What benefit would it bring?

Mind you, if you can make the case that it *would* be useful, I'll do
it. I'm willing to be convinced. Just FYI, I did so initially; you may
recall that Noricus, who was a Praetor at the time and was prosecuting
the case, disappeared from NR "without a trace" shortly after I filed
the Petitio Actionis, and my life got very busy, as it does at
intervals, during that time. It just didn't seem to be very useful.

> Documented accusations and official compaints without
> trial and conviction will not cut it and anyway Censor Marinus just
> indicated that such complaint records are not easily released.

Let's be very cautious with this statement, amice - that's not what he
said at all. Certainly, email to Censores is, and should be, private as
a default - but if that email contains macronationally-actionable
threats, then Nova Roma would be violating macronational law if they
withheld that information from the person being threatened or from the
macronational authorities.

Let me state, in passing, that I've found the official actions of Nova
Roma in that regard to be perfectly legal and 100% cooperative.


Vale et valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Fortes fortuna adiuvat.
Fortune favours the brave.
-- Terence, "Phormio"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40208 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Petitio tribunatus P. Memmi Albucii
SALVETE QUIRITES !
SALVE TRIBUNE MEMMI ALBUCI !

Even if you will run for tribunus plebis or plebeian aedile you will have all my respect. Because you are a honest and dedicated citizen in NR .
Quirites !
I understand that from his intercessio to the Megalesia Cultural Award. When I was looking twice and deeper. He didn't want to stop the games. He want to have more participants from all around the world. In fact he want to develop the games. To have more participants, even if the jurry work become intricate. And he succeded. At the last Ludi, with the Illustrus Curulis Aedilis Iulius Sulla aproval, our cohors was able to organize the Cultural Award in many languages. So, participants from different area send us their works. I belive that it was a succes. And the ideea it was from the Tribunus Albucius.
I meet him at Rome. It is different when we meet our citizens face to face. Because there I saw his dedication. There I saw the same passion for the NR laws. The same passion for a exactly understanding about how the things in NR are moving on. And I saw he is nice, polite and very kindly, too. He is a Roman and the laws cognition represent his Romanitas.

VALETE ET VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS


Tribune Albucius <albucius_aoe@...> wrote:
P. Memmius Albucius Plebiis Quiritibusque s.d.

In candida toga an after mature consideration, I have the honor, dear
Plebeii, to present you my humble candidacy for the tribunate in
MMDCCLVIIII a.u.c. (2006 c.e.).

I have been one of your five tribunes of the plebs this year, in 2758
a.u.c..

Why a second candidacy ?

My first motivation is to listen to several of you, Plebeii, and to
some Hon. Patricii, too, who have recently asked me to reconsider my
initial decision not to run for office this year. This consideration
has been backed up by the state that we have all made recently :
there are not enough candidates for our plebeian offices.

So I decide to tell you that I was ready to run for a new annual
mandate in the Tribunate.

Why the Tribunate ?

First because I think that there are currently some experienced cives
who have good skills for Aedilitas plebis, and for our other non-
strictly-plebeian magistracies.

Then, because I think that I would, if elected, have good working
relations with current tribune candidates, Hon. Vipsanius Agrippa,
who has usefully assisted me this year and must be daily thanked to
have involved himself in our NR goods, with Hon. Suetonius Paulinus,
whose each intervention is clear and clever, and with former consul
Astur, whose work in « real life events » in Hispania is an example
for us all, and former Tribune Arminius, whose contribution for Nova
Roma has been decisive.

Third, because I think that we need that some our offices be occupied
by citizens who have no political affiliation and no other obligation
except to serve our State and to honor our Gods.

At last, in our situation of a lack of candidates, I think that my
experience and my skills of lawyer (I do apologize again for
them... ;-) ) may be useful to our Res publica.

Concerning this experience, my objective has been, during my office
this year, to keep close to the mandate that you, the Plebs of Nova
Roma, has given me when You made me the honor to elect me last year.

This mandate was to fulfill the whole obligations and rights that the
constitution and the laws of Nova Roma give to the tribunes of the
plebs.

I have thus tried to develop a « legal », non political, conception
of the duty of the Tribune of the Plebs.

The tribunate must be open to a daily collaboration with the other
constitutional powers and, at the same time, be firm on the respect
of our leges by all, specially by our magistrates. One thing is to
make our laws change, another to respect, first, our current
legislation. This one is our true novaroman contract, and the way we
believe and practice roman values.

I used this year the tribunician right of intercessio each time that
I considered, in full conscience, that law has not been respected,
even for actions which would have had, once legally presented, my
full support. Debates have occurred, and they have been useful for
our democracy, whatever their conclusion.

I have thus worked, last summer, with Hon. Consul Caesar on the
application of our legislation on tax paying, which allowed the
consulate to register, after real efforts, the payment of our annual
contribution by some of our illustrious magistrates (our laws forbid
a citizen to be in office if his/her tax is not paid).

Though I have backed the return of resigning Saturninus in office, I
have then defended the right of a citizen to have his/her case heard
by the comitia plebis tributa when he considered that his
constitutional rights were not respected by the decision of a
tribune. I then underlined that any tribune had the right to speak on
behalf of the comitia, which is the Plebs itself. In order to try to
build an appropriate legal frame, I then proposed last august a lex «
de provocatione ».

I have intervened in some various fields, as the proceedings of
adoption, to have our law respected.

I have assumed the current tasks of a tribune, as to answer the
questions of the Plebeians, to organise the sessions of the comitia
plebis tributa, or to report the sessions of the Senate.

At last, as a Tribune and as Legatus Galliae representing Hon.
Propraetor Apollonius Scipio, I have, in August, attended the
european conventus which gave me the chance to meet wonderful people
(they will all recognize theirselves).

I have expressed, in our main list, my opinions on some of the key
questions that we faced this year 2758, and which will arise again in
2759 : the constitution, the resignation, the right of provocatio,
the tax paying obligation, etc.. I ask each of you, Plebeii
Quiritesque, to have a look of these posts in our ML. And, naturally,
to ask me for further questions if necessary.

I have tried, at last, to keep some reserve in the main list, for
magistrates must not, in my humble opinion, use our forum to express
daily their point of view.

Concerning my current situation of Tribune, I will carry on my duties
for 2758 a.u.c. till Dec. 31, unless my candidacy might interfere
with my obligations. In this last and sole case, I would let my
colleagues tribunes represent our tribunate.

Sincerely yours, Plebeii Quiritesque,


P. Memmius Albucius
Candidatus tribunicius





---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------







"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Personals
Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet.
Lots of someones, actually. Try Yahoo! Personals

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40209 From: jerichomyles2002 Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Behavior in NR (QFM)
Salve, Suetonie

I agree with you whole heartedly in your email. I too was not here when the alleged
actions took place. I can not speak on behalf or against any individuals involved. Nor do I
judge such persons, but by their actions they may be judged.

My only concern was that any action of a similar type, would be dealt with. That is, and
will be, my only concern. It is good to know that Nova Roma does have in place methods
for dealing with such behavior.

Vale, Gratti
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40210 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Questions for Candidates
Salve M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus et al

As we are currently discussing a Lex that will be proposed to regulate the resignation of Magistrates would you be so kind as to give us you views on the subject.

I invite all the candidates to share your views on the issue.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: marcushoratius<mailto:mhoratius@...>
To: ComitiaPlebisTributa@yahoogroups.com<mailto:ComitiaPlebisTributa@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 3:56 PM
Subject: [CPT] Candidacy for Tribunus Plebis


M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Tribunis Plebis et Quiritibus omnes
salutem plurinam dicit.


Previously in Nova Roma I was honored to serve as Tribunus Plebis
along with my colleague Titus Labienus Fortunatus, and also as
Flamen Cerealis. Out of filial piety for my paterfamilias, N.
Moravius Vado, that most honorable man, I felt compelled to resign
my office when he and other honorable members of the Senate
renounced their citizenship. After leaving Nova Roma I twice served
as consul of the Societas Via Romana, twice as rector of the
Collegium Religiosum, as Senator, Iurisconsultus, Pontifex Maximas,
Flamen Cerealis, augur, and as of late was a member of the Consilium
that drafted new regulae for that fine organization. I also serve
on the Board of Advisors to the Temple Religio Romana of California,
along with Pontifex Antonius Gryllus Graecus, as well as serve as a
moderator for the Temple's email list. In addition I serve as an
advisor and counselor for other religio Romana groups. At the
Academia Thules I have served as a praeceptor on Roman rituals. The
Senate of Nova Roma even passed a special resolution in recognition
for the work that I performed at the Academia, even though at the
time I was not yet a civis. Recently I have been appointed Caput
Generis Doctrinae Religionis Romanae at Academia Thules. Since
rejoining Nova Roma I have served as Scriba Censoris Census Primus
CFBQ as head of the Officina Census that performed the recent Census
2005, and I have accepted the appointment as Procurator in provincia
Lacus Magni offered me by propraetor Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus.

Formerly I served as an intelligence analyst in the US Army. I have
been a land surveyor, instructor, civil servant, and restaurant
owner. Currently I am retired, following complications from
injuries I received while serving in the military. I am married,
for the past thirty two years, and have fathered a daughter and five
sons. Having already lost three sons in the early years of their
lives, my youngest son now serves in US Army intelligence in Iraq.
My educational background has been in history (BA), land surveying
(AAS), and in education with a specialty in mathematics. I am
currently a member of the ACLU, NOW, the Sons of Italy, and have
previously been a member of such advocacy and charitable
organizations as the March of Dimes and the American Heart
Association. In my spare time I have been a contributor to the
University of Ottawa's update of the "Encyclopedia of Gods and
Goddesses," providing articles on the divinities of Italic tribes,
and have also been consulted in other research projects related to
the religious traditions of Roma Antiqua and Italia Archaica.

Today I enter the Forum dressed in toga candida to humbly offer once
more my experience and service to the Quirites Novae Romae as a
candidate for the office of Tribunus Plebis.






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "ComitiaPlebisTributa<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ComitiaPlebisTributa>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ComitiaPlebisTributa-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:ComitiaPlebisTributa-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40211 From: marciusfelix Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Candiidates for QUAESTOR
Salve Tiberius Galerius Paulinus et Salvate Omnibus,

Before being candidate for Quaetor Position I looked for to know what
I went to make.

In July I sent for this list the post
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/35527, where I got
the first answers.

to put for the position of EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM I do not know what
to make or how much time I go to need. For this, I ask for that they
explain this magistracy to me.

How much the magistracies: AEDILIS PLEBIS, CUSTOS and DIRIBITOR I
am apt.

I do not see no problem in moving but if to appear candidates for
this vacant would like to come back to concur for QUAESTOR.

But it is only action will be inside of the law.

Vale et Valete.
Titus Marcius Felix





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tim Gallagher" <spqr753@m...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Titus Marcius Felix
>
> Iam not sayingyou should not run for Quaestor but to take a moment
and look at the other offices that we need to fill. Do you think you
could put together a monthly online newsletter?
>
> If you do then you might me the right person to serve as EDITOR
COMMENTARIORUM.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: marciusfelix<mailto:marciusfelix@y...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 1:03 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Candiidates for QUAESTOR
>
>
> Salve Tiberius Galerius Paulinus et Salvate Omnibus,
>
> This is my first participation and would like to start for the
> Quaestor position, but I am ready to serve where it will be more
> necessary in this way I am the Nova Roma disposal.
>
> Vale et Valete.
> Titus Marcius Felix
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-
Roma@yahoogroups.com>, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@m...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Candidates for Quaestor ( or anybody else for that
matter)
> >
> > As we have 10 good candidates for Quaestor and we can only
elect 8
> I was wondering if one or two of you would give some thought to
> running for either
> >
> > AEDILIS PLEBIS, EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM, DIRIBITOR or CUSTOS
> >
> > If you are a Plebian you can stand for any of the above offices
and
> if you are a Patrician you can stand for all of them except
AEDILIS
> PLEBIS. The Republic needs ALL offices filled and your
willingness to
> drop out of the Quaestor race and run for one of these will be
> remembered by the electorate for a long time.
> >
> >
> > Vale
> >
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-
Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-
unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40212 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM
Salve Titus Marcius Felix et al

The EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM is the editor of the Nova Roma online newsletter. It has been masterfully put together for the past two years by the Honorable Senator Marcus Audens.

You can see the Aquila at www.novaroma.org/aquila<http://www.novaroma.org/aquila>

Senator Audens can be reached at <MarcusAudens@...<mailto:MarcusAudens@...>> if you have more questions


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


----- Original Message -----
From: marciusfelix<mailto:marciusfelix@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 3:42 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Candiidates for QUAESTOR


Salve Tiberius Galerius Paulinus et Salvate Omnibus,

Before being candidate for Quaetor Position I looked for to know what
I went to make.

In July I sent for this list the post
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/35527,<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/35527,> where I got
the first answers.

to put for the position of EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM I do not know what
to make or how much time I go to need. For this, I ask for that they
explain this magistracy to me.

How much the magistracies: AEDILIS PLEBIS, CUSTOS and DIRIBITOR I
am apt.

I do not see no problem in moving but if to appear candidates for
this vacant would like to come back to concur for QUAESTOR.

But it is only action will be inside of the law.

Vale et Valete.
Titus Marcius Felix





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tim Gallagher" <spqr753@m...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Titus Marcius Felix
>
> Iam not sayingyou should not run for Quaestor but to take a moment
and look at the other offices that we need to fill. Do you think you
could put together a monthly online newsletter?
>
> If you do then you might me the right person to serve as EDITOR
COMMENTARIORUM.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: marciusfelix<mailto:marciusfelix@y...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 1:03 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Candiidates for QUAESTOR
>
>
> Salve Tiberius Galerius Paulinus et Salvate Omnibus,
>
> This is my first participation and would like to start for the
> Quaestor position, but I am ready to serve where it will be more
> necessary in this way I am the Nova Roma disposal.
>
> Vale et Valete.
> Titus Marcius Felix
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-
Roma@yahoogroups.com>, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@m...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Candidates for Quaestor ( or anybody else for that
matter)
> >
> > As we have 10 good candidates for Quaestor and we can only
elect 8
> I was wondering if one or two of you would give some thought to
> running for either
> >
> > AEDILIS PLEBIS, EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM, DIRIBITOR or CUSTOS
> >
> > If you are a Plebian you can stand for any of the above offices
and
> if you are a Patrician you can stand for all of them except
AEDILIS
> PLEBIS. The Republic needs ALL offices filled and your
willingness to
> drop out of the Quaestor race and run for one of these will be
> remembered by the electorate for a long time.
> >
> >
> > Vale
> >
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-
Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>>" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-
unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>>.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40213 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Gaius Geminius Germanus for Praetor
> As colleagues Gaius Geminius Germanus and I will endeavor to fulfill the constitutional
> duty to "administer the law " in a judicial and unbiased manner and will monitor the main
> list of Nova Roma in the same way. We will do so without regard to individuals and will
> strive to apply the law equally .
>
> As Praetor Gaius Geminius Germanus will endeavor to perform all other duties of his
> office according to the best of his abilities and understanding and in adherence to the
> Constitution, and laws of Nova Roma .

Will he? We haven't had any statement of such from the candidate himself; his
declaration of candidacy consisted of only two sentences, in which both his own name
and "Quaestor" were spelled incorrectly. Surely an applicant for the Praetorship -
and admission to the Senate - should have a resumé more than an inch long.

I will vote for Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus, whose history in Nova Roma is just
as long by the calendar, but far more impressive. Titus Octavius has served well
as Quaestor, Magister Aranearius, Accensus and scriba to several senior magistrates,
and in several provincial offices.

Praetors have jurisdiction over the mailing list. The ideal candidate is one who
participates regularly in list discussions, and who is even-tempered, dedicated,
and able to write well. Titus Octavius is all of these.

I could not be more pleased in a candidate for Praetor.

TITUS OCTAVIUS PIUS FOR PRAETOR!

Vale,
M. Octavius Germanicus, Consular.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40214 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Gaius Geminius Germanus for Praetor
---Salve Marce Octavi et Salvete Omnes:

I haven't taken the time to formally endorse any candidate save
Tullia Scholastica for Rogator, but let me take the time to say that
I too shall be voting for Octavius Pius. He will make an
outstanding Praetor.

I shall be voting for C. Curius Saturninus as well.


I realize that the concept of two Praetors working together is
appealing, but the concept of one Praetoral candidate telling the
populace definitively what the other will 'do' makes me a bit
uncomfortable. How can one endorse a platform that the candidate has
not presented in the first place..hmmm

I can only hope that our silent Praetoral candidate is not running
soley at the request of Galerius Paulinus, but I shall leave the
candidate in question to answer that.

Valete,
Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Matt Hucke <hucke@c...> wrote:
>
>
> > As colleagues Gaius Geminius Germanus and I will endeavor to
fulfill the constitutional
> > duty to "administer the law " in a judicial and unbiased manner
and will monitor the main
> > list of Nova Roma in the same way. We will do so without regard
to individuals and will
> > strive to apply the law equally .
> >
> > As Praetor Gaius Geminius Germanus will endeavor to perform all
other duties of his
> > office according to the best of his abilities and understanding
and in adherence to the
> > Constitution, and laws of Nova Roma .
>
> Will he? We haven't had any statement of such from the candidate
himself; his
> declaration of candidacy consisted of only two sentences, in which
both his own name
> and "Quaestor" were spelled incorrectly. Surely an applicant for
the Praetorship -
> and admission to the Senate - should have a resumé more than an
inch long.
>
> I will vote for Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus, whose history in
Nova Roma is just
> as long by the calendar, but far more impressive. Titus Octavius
has served well
> as Quaestor, Magister Aranearius, Accensus and scriba to several
senior magistrates,
> and in several provincial offices.
>
> Praetors have jurisdiction over the mailing list. The ideal
candidate is one who
> participates regularly in list discussions, and who is even-
tempered, dedicated,
> and able to write well. Titus Octavius is all of these.
>
> I could not be more pleased in a candidate for Praetor.
>
> TITUS OCTAVIUS PIUS FOR PRAETOR!
>
> Vale,
> M. Octavius Germanicus, Consular.
>
> --
> hucke@c...
> http://www.graveyards.com
>
> "The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
> voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40215 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Tiberio Galerio Paulino salutem dicit

The call for non-Plebeian candidates ended at 8:00 PM Rome time, December
3rd, 2005. Currently it is 11:23 PM in Rome.

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 12/3/05, Tim Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Titus Marcius Felix et al
>
> The EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM is the editor of the Nova Roma online
> newsletter. It has been masterfully put together for the past two years by
> the Honorable Senator Marcus Audens.
>
> You can see the Aquila at www.novaroma.org/aquila<
> http://www.novaroma.org/aquila>
>
> Senator Audens can be reached at <MarcusAudens@...<mailto:
> MarcusAudens@...>> if you have more questions
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40216 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Tiberio Galerio Paulino salutem dicit

The following is my opinion on resignations:

My opinion on resignations is that if a magistrate resigns from public
office the Consuls should review the resignation, and discuss it among
themselves. Either both Consuls, or one among them, should contact the
resigned magistrate to find the exact reason for the resignation. If, after
some discussion, it is determined that the individual in question truly
wants to resign then the Consuls should then issue an edict officially
notifying the people that said magistrate has officially resigned and
indicate than an election will be held in the near future to fill the
vacency -- or in some cases the senate will be convened to appoint a
successor, depending upon the office vacated.

This would give the chief magistrates of Nova Roma an opportunity to find
out why citizens are willing to walk away from their post, correct a
potential problem from getting worse, and/or convincing the person to remain
in office. Often times people resign from office because they are
frustrated. They want to leave Nova Roma because they feel they can no
longer make a difference. Compassion, and understanding is the necessary
solution.

It is tragic to see a magistrate resign his or her office. Getting to the
real reason for the resignation is important. We can sit back and pass
judgement against an individual as long as we like. The fact of the matter
is that every single person in Nova Roma has a life that includes vast
elements that are not a part of Nova Roma. Issues dealing with marriage,
divorce, deaths, births, loss of friendships, faith issues, etc... All of
these factors have an impact on how a person performs in their duties to
Nova Roma. If we ignore the demands placed on citizens throughout our
Republic then we ignore the future of Nova Roma. People are what makes Nova
Roma great, and they are our most valuable resource. We should not loose
sight of this.

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

[This is also posted on my blog: http://modianus.blogspot.com ]

On 12/3/05, Tim Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
> Salve M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus et al
>
> As we are currently discussing a Lex that will be proposed to regulate the
> resignation of Magistrates would you be so kind as to give us you views on
> the subject.
>
> I invite all the candidates to share your views on the issue.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40217 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Behavior in NR (QFM)
A. Apollonius C. Minucio omnibusque sal.

Amice, I can understand your lack of faith in our
judicial process in light of your past experiences
with it, but I think you will take a pause to reflect
when I remind you that not much more than a year ago
we were hearing some pretty similar sentiments from
one L. Sicinius Drusus.

On that occasion he was defending his decision to
complain directly to Yahoo about another citizen's
alleged violations of the "Terms of Service" without
going through our courts. Of course there is a vast
difference between a violation of Yahoo's terms of
service and a threat to kill someone. It would be
absurd to maintain that Nova Roma has the resources to
restrain someone who is intent on causing physical
harm to another person, and if any citizen should ever
believe there to be a real and immediate danger which
can only be met by police officers in the relevant
country, I would fully support that citizen in
alerting the police.

But in all other matters, I can see no earthly reason
why a citizen with a grievance against another should
not seek redress through our internal judicial process
before going to outside authorities. In fact to do
otherwise would be pernicious and potentially harmful
to Nova Roma, because at the very best it would invite
negative coverage in the press and at worst it could
end up with the organization itself being dragged into
the courts (I'm sure you remember the occasion not too
long ago when a senator was threatening to sue not
only another senator but Nova Roma itself over some
remark made by the latter, and that's not the only
example one could think of).

What distinguishes a republic from any other
assortment of people is the rule of law; and this is
particularly so in a Roman republic, since law was the
principal achievement of Roman civilization. When one
looks at this way - and I do look at it this way - one
sees, I think, that it is not only an option but a
duty to seek redress within Nova Roma before looking
outside. The burden shifts, then, from "what good does
it do me?" to "how can I justify not doing it?". As
I've said, there is a real justification when there's
an immediate danger of harm to oneself or someone else
which cannot possibly be met by Nova Roma and which is
in any case too urgent to risk trying. But cases like
that, in which the objective is the aversion of
danger, will be the minority. In the majority of cases
the objective is not the aversion of danger but the
securing of justice, and it would be grossly insulting
to what we've built over these last eight years to
suggest that Nova Roma cannot provide justice.

There are, to be sure, limits to the remedies we can
offer. A public apology is one of the standard
remedies; compensation and other forms of reparation,
financial or otherwise, are also available; and there
is also the possibility of limiting or even totally
removing a person's right to participate in this
community. Of course we can't guarantee that someone
ordered to make an apology or pay compensation will do
it - all we can say is that if he does he will most
likely find himself kicked out of Nova Roma
completely. And if, having gone through the process,
you feel that's still not enough, there is nothing to
stop you seeking further satisfaction from national
courts. But there is always the possibility that the
matter can be adequately settled within these walls,
and when it costs you nothing to find out (for our
judicial system's one great advantage over others is
that it is totally free to use) what reason can there
be not to try? And in fact doesn't a citizen who knows
of some wrong done by another owe it to this community
to have that wrong out in the open so that the
community can take appropriate measures to protect
itself? It would be rather bizarre for a citizen who
is sufficiently pernicious to be taken to a national
court nonetheless to be allowed to remain a member of
this community, yet that would be the result of
failing to take action through our own judicial
system, for due legal process is the only way we can
get rid of someone like that. Even if a citizen were
to be convicted of crimes against humanity in the
International Criminal Court, Nova Roma would be
unable, by our own laws, to deprive him of his
citizenship unless someone were prepared to put him on
trial here.

A judicial system is one of the principal mechanisms a
society uses to reinforce its code of social behaviour
and to distinguish the acceptable from the
unacceptable. It is also one of the mechanisms by
which a community protects itself from people who are
harmful. And it is a way for a member of that
community to vindicate his rights in the eyes of his
peers. Those are three things that only Nova Roma's
judicial system can do in Nova Roma. If a Nigerian
court convicts one of our citizens of libelling
another, what good does that do any of us? It doesn't
send out a signal that Nova Roma refuses to tolerate
libel. It doesn't allow Nova Roma to get rid of the
libeller. It doesn't even do much to vindicate the
libellee, for why should I, a Roman citizen and a
resident of the U.K., take any notice of what a
Nigerian court says? The only advantage I can see is
an advantage for the libellee himself in that he will
probably get more money out of the libeller than he
would from a court in Nova Roma, and even that he
could have done anyway if he had bothered to go
through our judicial system first.

I'm not trying to persuade you here to prosecute
someone whom you don't particularly want to prosecute
at all. But if you ever do get to the stage of wanting
to take a fellow-citizen to court for something he's
done to you or another citizen, I hope you'll try to
get some justice within Nova Roma before resorting to
national courts. The question isn't whether there's
any reason to try our system first; it's whether
there's any reason not to.





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40218 From: Titus Marcius Felix Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM
Salve Senator Audens et Salvate Omnibus,

It could inform which is the structure of the Aquila and I still ask for a fast explanation on the process.

I am sent this message also for the main list of Nova Roma and request that the reply they also either done in. Because its reply it can be util for probable candidates to the position of EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM.

Using to advantage the chance I want to congratulate for its great work for Nova Roma.

Vale et Valete.
Titus Marcius Felix






---------------------------------
Yahoo! doce lar. Faça do Yahoo! sua homepage.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40219 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
A. Apollonius C. Buteoni sal.

> My opinion on resignations is that if a magistrate
> resigns from public
> office the Consuls should review the resignation,
> and discuss it among
> themselves. Either both Consuls, or one among them,
> should contact the
> resigned magistrate to find the exact reason for the
> resignation. If, after
> some discussion, it is determined that the
> individual in question truly
> wants to resign then the Consuls should then issue
> an edict officially
> notifying the people that said magistrate has
> officially resigned and
> indicate than an election will be held in the near
> future to fill the
> vacency -- or in some cases the senate will be
> convened to appoint a
> successor, depending upon the office vacated.

I can see the sense in that, and it's a very humane
position, but it would leave the law wide open to
abuse and confusion. For one thing it would give the
consules an effective power of veto over other
magistrates' resignations or, on the other hand, a
power to keep them out of office. The consules could
decide that a magistrate's reasons for resigning were
not good enough, and could then force that person to
remain in office against his will, thus lumbering the
republic with a useless magistrate for the rest of the
year; or they might be so pleased to see the back of
him that they would ignore his requests to be
reinstated. In short, it would give the consules very
dangerous powers which they never had in ancient
times.

Moreover, why should the consules have the right to
decide what is a good enough reason to resign and what
is a good enough reason to be allowed to revoke a
resignation? One of the principal complaints against
the tribunes earlier this year was that by deciding
whether or not a magistrate was fit to continue in
office after trying to resign they were, it was said,
usurping the sovereign and exclusive right of the
populus to decide who should be a magistrate and who
should not. The same would be true if you were to
remove that power from the tribunes and give it to the
consules.

Even in the absence of abuse, it would risk
introducing yet more complexity and confusion into an
already complex and confused area of law. How long
would the consules be allowed to think it over? Would
the resignation be kept secret in the mean time? What
if the magistrate resigns publicly without consulting
the consules? How much effort should be made to
contact the magistrate? What if one or both the
consules resign? And so on. All these things would
have to be regulated and specified.

To my mind there is ample allowance for human frailty
in the provision which allows magistrates who resign
and then change their minds to stand for immediate
re-election. This allows the populus, and not the
tribunes or the consules, to judge whether he is fit
to continue in office. If his resignation was the
result of great stress and his situation evokes
popular sympathy, he will probably be re-elected; if
it was for some trivial reason, he won't be. If he
really doesn't want to be a magistrate at all, he
won't stand for re-election.

But creating built-in periods of grace, whether
automatic or at consular discretion, simply encourages
people to resign on the spur of the moment and then
think better of it later. It is not the way to
encourage people to think carefully and consult their
friends before making the decision, because they will
always know that they will have time to do that
afterwards. There is a real danger that the system of
periods of grace simply allows magistrates to indulge
their own frustrations and need for sympathy by making
a dramatic gesture without having to live with the
consequences. We should give magistrates more support
*while they are still in office*, and we should
encourage them to seek advice and reassurance before
making important decisions. Allowing them to resign
and then change their minds afterwards is simply a way
of making ourselves feel less guilty about having let
them get to that level of desparation in the first
place. It stops us having to take the extra effort to
check regularly whether our friends are all right
because we know that if they ever get desperate they
can just resign and then we can support them
afterwards, when it's already too late. As long as we
allow this pattern to continue, we are excusing
magistrates from taking responsibility for their
actions and we are excusing ourselves from giving our
magistrates adequate support.

Let resignation be resignation. We'll all know where
we stand. Magistrates who don't really want to resign
will no longer be encouraged to do so in the hope of
an outpouring of sympathy and no adverse consequences.
Magistrates who do really want to resign will be able
to do so without facing overwhelming pressure from
well-meaning friends wanting to push them back into
the job which they found so stressful they wanted to
leave. People who don't already offer their magistrate
friends enough support will have no excuse for failing
to do so. People who struggle through hard and
thankless terms of office without giving in to the
urge to resign will no longer have to see less
principled behaviour rewarded with the sympathy they
have been denied. In short, we'll all know where we
stand, and we can start to address the real problems.



___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40220 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve Fabius Modianus et salvete omnes.

I'm assuming it is OK to discuss the issue :-) so I'd like to
address Fabius Modianus' response regarding resignations.

Hold onto your hats, folks --- I agree with almost every word he
wrote. The onse serious difference I have with his view arises from
this statement:

"My opinion on resignations is that if a magistrate resigns from
public office the Consuls should review the resignation, and discuss
it among themselves."

Why do I find this troubling? Because the consuls are not the source
of the power of a magistrate, any more than a censor, or a quaestor,
or an aedule, or a tribune. The consuls do not have the power to
"review" a magistrate's resignation if it is possible that the end
result of such a review would be the re-instatement of the magistrate
in question. The only source capable of bestowing magisterial
authority of any level whatsoever is the People of the Republic,
through the lawful means dictated by the People through the Constitution.

"As he [the consul P. Valerius] entered, the 'fasces' were lowered, to
the great delight of the multitude, who understood that it was to them
that they were lowered as an open avowal that the dignity and might of
the people were greater than those of the consul." - Livy, History of
Rome 2.7

It is a trust given by the People through the exercize of their
Constitutional right to elect their government; it is a trust that
only the People can bestow, and once resigned, it returns to the
People to be given out or witheld as they see fit. It is the property
of the People, not the government, and no branch of the government has
the right to obstruct the will of a free people.

This is why resignation of an office is such a serious issue, and why
I have been hounding people about creating a lex to deal with it over
the past 10 months, and was so delighted to see Popillius Laenas
present us with an option to discuss.

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40221 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
In a message dated 12/3/2005 2:25:06 PM Pacific Standard Time,
tau.athanasios@... writes:
My opinion on resignations is that if a magistrate resigns from public
office the Consuls should review the resignation, and discuss it among
themselves. Either both Consuls, or one among them, should contact the
resigned magistrate to find the exact reason for the resignation. If, after
some discussion, it is determined that the individual in question truly
wants to resign then the Consuls should then issue an edict officially
notifying the people that said magistrate has officially resigned and
indicate than an election will be held in the near future to fill the
vacency -- or in some cases the senate will be convened to appoint a
successor, depending upon the office vacated.
While I applaud Modanius for concern in making sure the resignation is not
hastily
received, I worry about giving the Consules such added power. What is
proposed is that
the Consules can issue an edictum keeping the magistrate in their place, even
though
the official no longer wishes to serve. A forced conscriptment if you may.

So I would be against such an addition, because if the person really wants to
vacate the office, they will, and then the Republic will be burdened with a
useless official not doing his job and a new person to replace him cannot be
elected.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40222 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Salve:

I see your point, and I acknowledge what you are saying. I do however, feel
that the resignation should be discussed before it is fully acknowledge.
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus asked my opinion, and what I wrote was my opinion
on the matter.

I see merit it making a resignation take effect immediatly, but I do
understand that there are situations were a resignation was done too
hastily. Look at Gaius Iulius Scaurus, and Gaius Popillius Laenas. Both
resigned their office, and were allowed to come back. Now Laenas is
Consul.

What I have indicated is what I believe is the most compassionate solution;
its not necessarily the most historical or the most political. However, I
do see the merit in making a resignation effective immediatly -- "cleaner"
and easier all things considered.

Vale;

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 12/3/05, gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salve Fabius Modianus et salvete omnes.
>
> I'm assuming it is OK to discuss the issue :-) so I'd like to
> address Fabius Modianus' response regarding resignations.
>
> Hold onto your hats, folks --- I agree with almost every word he
> wrote. The onse serious difference I have with his view arises from
> this statement:
>
> "My opinion on resignations is that if a magistrate resigns from
> public office the Consuls should review the resignation, and discuss
> it among themselves."
>
> Why do I find this troubling? Because the consuls are not the source
> of the power of a magistrate, any more than a censor, or a quaestor,
> or an aedule, or a tribune. The consuls do not have the power to
> "review" a magistrate's resignation if it is possible that the end
> result of such a review would be the re-instatement of the magistrate
> in question. The only source capable of bestowing magisterial
> authority of any level whatsoever is the People of the Republic,
> through the lawful means dictated by the People through the Constitution.
>
> "As he [the consul P. Valerius] entered, the 'fasces' were lowered, to
> the great delight of the multitude, who understood that it was to them
> that they were lowered as an open avowal that the dignity and might of
> the people were greater than those of the consul." - Livy, History of
> Rome 2.7
>
> It is a trust given by the People through the exercize of their
> Constitutional right to elect their government; it is a trust that
> only the People can bestow, and once resigned, it returns to the
> People to be given out or witheld as they see fit. It is the property
> of the People, not the government, and no branch of the government has
> the right to obstruct the will of a free people.
>
> This is why resignation of an office is such a serious issue, and why
> I have been hounding people about creating a lex to deal with it over
> the past 10 months, and was so delighted to see Popillius Laenas
> present us with an option to discuss.
>
> Vale et valete,
>
> Cato


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40223 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
C. Equitius Cato Q. Fabio Buteoni Modiano quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Fabius Modianus, you are right in that there should be a great deal of
compassion involved. You are also right that this particular kind of
compassion is neither historical nor politically sound --- although by
"politically" I mean "governmentally", in that it can (as we have
already seen) cause such animosity that the very workings of the
government can be impeded.

So perhaps we can blend your ideal of compassion with Cordus' ideal of
support and try to become more compassionate *before* a magistrate
reaches the point where he or she feels "compelled" to resign.

Problem is, when magistrates resign sometimes they say things about
those of us who remain that are, to say the least, unflattering:

"NR is a only a cause of unhappiness for me and there is no point of
losing ones peace of mind for the sake of role-playing game. I entered
with little hopes and with little hopes I will leave you all, I think
NR will fail...there is no honour in NR..."

How should we answer that?

"Oh, you're right, but our failure-bound, dishonorable role-playing
game is so much more fun with you in a position of leadership" ?

To be honest, by now there cannot possibly be an aspirant to a
magistracy who does not know the effect that a resignation has on the
Republic. The Republic should, therefore, make it absolutely clear
that such an offense (for I believe it to be one) against the Republic
has serious consequences.

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40224 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Salvete omnes, et salve Buteo,

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus wrote:

> My opinion on resignations is that if a magistrate resigns from public
> office the Consuls should review the resignation, and discuss it among
> themselves.

I see that both Cordus and Cato have already replied to this, and I
agree with them. For all that the intention here is compassionate, the
implementation of such a process would be utterly contrary to historic
practice. Magistrates are not dependent on the consuls, and the consuls
do not have the authority to permit or withold resignation of other
magistrates within their consular imperium. Some might ask how I can
say this when I, as consul, accepted an apology from G. Iulius Scaurus.
My answer is that he had not officially resigned his office at that
time, since he had not written to the censors or the consuls doing so.
Resignation messages posted here in the forum are meaningless, and
remain so. A magistrate resigns by informing whomever the convening
magistrate of the elective assembly that elected him or her happens to be.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40225 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Salve Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

Thank you for taking the time to enter the discussion. I appreciate the time you have take to share your views on the issue with us.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: David Kling<mailto:tau.athanasios@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Questions for Candidates


Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Tiberio Galerio Paulino salutem dicit

The following is my opinion on resignations:

My opinion on resignations is that if a magistrate resigns from public
office the Consuls should review the resignation, and discuss it among
themselves. Either both Consuls, or one among them, should contact the
resigned magistrate to find the exact reason for the resignation. If, after
some discussion, it is determined that the individual in question truly
wants to resign then the Consuls should then issue an edict officially
notifying the people that said magistrate has officially resigned and
indicate than an election will be held in the near future to fill the
vacency -- or in some cases the senate will be convened to appoint a
successor, depending upon the office vacated.

This would give the chief magistrates of Nova Roma an opportunity to find
out why citizens are willing to walk away from their post, correct a
potential problem from getting worse, and/or convincing the person to remain
in office. Often times people resign from office because they are
frustrated. They want to leave Nova Roma because they feel they can no
longer make a difference. Compassion, and understanding is the necessary
solution.

It is tragic to see a magistrate resign his or her office. Getting to the
real reason for the resignation is important. We can sit back and pass
judgement against an individual as long as we like. The fact of the matter
is that every single person in Nova Roma has a life that includes vast
elements that are not a part of Nova Roma. Issues dealing with marriage,
divorce, deaths, births, loss of friendships, faith issues, etc... All of
these factors have an impact on how a person performs in their duties to
Nova Roma. If we ignore the demands placed on citizens throughout our
Republic then we ignore the future of Nova Roma. People are what makes Nova
Roma great, and they are our most valuable resource. We should not loose
sight of this.

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

[This is also posted on my blog: http://modianus.blogspot.com<http://modianus.blogspot.com/> ]

On 12/3/05, Tim Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
> Salve M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus et al
>
> As we are currently discussing a Lex that will be proposed to regulate the
> resignation of Magistrates would you be so kind as to give us you views on
> the subject.
>
> I invite all the candidates to share your views on the issue.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ> Fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA> The fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ>
Roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40226 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Behavior in NR (QFM)
Caius Minucius Scaevola A. Apolloni Corde SPD.

On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 10:26:41PM +0000, A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
> A. Apollonius C. Minucio omnibusque sal.
>
> Amice, I can understand your lack of faith in our
> judicial process in light of your past experiences
> with it, but I think you will take a pause to reflect
> when I remind you that not much more than a year ago
> we were hearing some pretty similar sentiments from
> one L. Sicinius Drusus.
>
> On that occasion he was defending his decision to
> complain directly to Yahoo about another citizen's
> alleged violations of the "Terms of Service" without
> going through our courts. Of course there is a vast
> difference between a violation of Yahoo's terms of
> service and a threat to kill someone. It would be
> absurd to maintain that Nova Roma has the resources to
> restrain someone who is intent on causing physical
> harm to another person, and if any citizen should ever
> believe there to be a real and immediate danger which
> can only be met by police officers in the relevant
> country, I would fully support that citizen in
> alerting the police.

Amice, my experience with the legal system in Nova Roma has been... less
than pleasant or positive on all counts. I filed a suit against Q.
Fabius, and the Praetor who took the case sat on the fence for a while,
then accepted someone else's extra-legal definition of what a
prosecutable case was - G. Iulius Scaurus had told him that I had to
*show actual damage* before he could accept my Petitio Actionis. Then,
he violated his Praetor's oath and duty by dragging his feet until I
told him that I'd report his actions to the higher magistrates. Shortly
after accepting, he disappeared without a word - although months later,
he was reported as doing just fine but having no time for NR. When he
left, everything ground to a halt - because no one else in all of Nova
Roma was "qualified" to do anything about it.

Is this the definition of injustice? Or is it just the picture next to
the definition in the dictionary?

In addition to this, all of this unproductive struggling consumed large
amounts of my time, and resulted in nothing more than annoyance and
frustration for me. In short, filing another Petitio carries a large
disincentive, and no direct payoff. Although it may satisfy that small
revenge motive, I don't see it as a worthwhile pursuit (and by 'small',
I don't mean the magnitude - I mean that only a small, mean person would
do it for that reason alone.)

> But in all other matters, I can see no earthly reason
> why a citizen with a grievance against another should
> not seek redress through our internal judicial process
> before going to outside authorities. In fact to do
> otherwise would be pernicious and potentially harmful
> to Nova Roma, because at the very best it would invite
> negative coverage in the press and at worst it could
> end up with the organization itself being dragged into
> the courts (I'm sure you remember the occasion not too
> long ago when a senator was threatening to sue not
> only another senator but Nova Roma itself over some
> remark made by the latter, and that's not the only
> example one could think of).

But you see, this is *precisely* the point on which everything pivots.
This is exactly the source of my frustration with the process.

Q. Fabius is a Senator, and as such (if I understand correctly) sits on
the NR Board of Directors. The fact that a member of that board has
acted in a criminal manner - that he has exposed Nova Roma to a lawsuit,
that his behavior is macronationally actionable - and that the board has
*not* kicked him out, has not disavowed his behavior... I generally try
to avoid being bitter, but this has destroyed my belief in the NR legal
system. That I, as a private citizen, have to struggle for something
that should have been done immediately and automatically as soon as the
evidence became available, is intolerable.

I felt like leaving Nova Roma at that point, and I will admit that I'm
not nearly as enchanted with it as I once was. The only thing that has
kept me here since then is the fact that I have good friends here.

> What distinguishes a republic from any other
> assortment of people is the rule of law; and this is
> particularly so in a Roman republic, since law was the
> principal achievement of Roman civilization.

This was my original expectation. It is, I'm sad to say, not so any
longer.

> I'm not trying to persuade you here to prosecute
> someone whom you don't particularly want to prosecute
> at all. But if you ever do get to the stage of wanting
> to take a fellow-citizen to court for something he's
> done to you or another citizen, I hope you'll try to
> get some justice within Nova Roma before resorting to
> national courts. The question isn't whether there's
> any reason to try our system first; it's whether
> there's any reason not to.

Belief in a system of justice involves trusting that there's a principle
of fairness that can be invoked; otherwise, justice is nothing more than
privilege, to be sold by the pound and the yard. Up until now, I have
not seen that principle demonstrated - in fact, I've only seen the
reverse. If I felt that justice here was possible - other than in the
court of public opinion - then I would invoke it.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Grammatici certant, et adhuc sub iudice lis est.
The scholars quarrel, and the case lies still undecided in the hands of the judge.
-- On that point the learned disagree.
-- Horace, "Ars poetica"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40227 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Asking other Citizens to Serve
Salve Senator Pompeia Minucia Tiberia presumptive Consul of Nova Roma who said in part

"I can only hope that our silent Praetoral candidate is not running
solely at the request of Galerius Paulinus, but I shall leave the
candidate in question to answer that"

Whither Gaius Geminius Germanus speaks for himself is as you say up to him but

I will comment. No I did not ask him to stand but what if I had, what's wrong with that ?
I have asked a number of people to stand for office. Some have said yes and others have said no.
While others I asked have decided to stand for a different office then what I had advised them to stand for.
So unless I am missing something it should be the duty of EVERY Nova Roman to ask others to serve
and to offer themselves as candidates.

Earlier this week unbeknownst to the other both Caius Minucius Scaevola and
I were hard at work looking for a candidate to stand for Magister Aranearius.
Instead of have no candidates for this most important office we each found a Nova Roman
willing to stand and serve. Regardless of who wins this race Nova Roma wins.

Senator Pompeia Minucia Tiberia presumptive Consul of Nova Roma
have you asked anybody to stand and serve? If you did THANK YOU

If not Why not?

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Candidate for Praetor


----- Original Message -----
From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia<mailto:pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 5:17 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Gaius Geminius Germanus for Praetor


---Salve Marce Octavi et Salvete Omnes:

I haven't taken the time to formally endorse any candidate save
Tullia Scholastica for Rogator, but let me take the time to say that
I too shall be voting for Octavius Pius. He will make an
outstanding Praetor.

I shall be voting for C. Curius Saturninus as well.


I realize that the concept of two Praetors working together is
appealing, but the concept of one Praetoral candidate telling the
populace definitively what the other will 'do' makes me a bit
uncomfortable. How can one endorse a platform that the candidate has
not presented in the first place..hmmm

I can only hope that our silent Praetoral candidate is not running
soley at the request of Galerius Paulinus, but I shall leave the
candidate in question to answer that.

Valete,
Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Matt Hucke <hucke@c...> wrote:
>
>
> > As colleagues Gaius Geminius Germanus and I will endeavor to
fulfill the constitutional
> > duty to "administer the law " in a judicial and unbiased manner
and will monitor the main
> > list of Nova Roma in the same way. We will do so without regard
to individuals and will
> > strive to apply the law equally .
> >
> > As Praetor Gaius Geminius Germanus will endeavor to perform all
other duties of his
> > office according to the best of his abilities and understanding
and in adherence to the
> > Constitution, and laws of Nova Roma .
>
> Will he? We haven't had any statement of such from the candidate
himself; his
> declaration of candidacy consisted of only two sentences, in which
both his own name
> and "Quaestor" were spelled incorrectly. Surely an applicant for
the Praetorship -
> and admission to the Senate - should have a resumé more than an
inch long.
>
> I will vote for Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus, whose history in
Nova Roma is just
> as long by the calendar, but far more impressive. Titus Octavius
has served well
> as Quaestor, Magister Aranearius, Accensus and scriba to several
senior magistrates,
> and in several provincial offices.
>
> Praetors have jurisdiction over the mailing list. The ideal
candidate is one who
> participates regularly in list discussions, and who is even-
tempered, dedicated,
> and able to write well. Titus Octavius is all of these.
>
> I could not be more pleased in a candidate for Praetor.
>
> TITUS OCTAVIUS PIUS FOR PRAETOR!
>
> Vale,
> M. Octavius Germanicus, Consular.
>
> --
> hucke@c...
> http://www.graveyards.com<http://www.graveyards.com/>
>
> "The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
> voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
>






SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ> Fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA> The fall of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ>
Roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40228 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
M. Hortensia Q. Fabio Maximo sd.
what on earth are you talking about? I suggest you
read up on the internet just what a podcast is. This is the coin
discussion all over again. Kindly keep up with the ML or read the
archives.
vale
Marca Hortensia Maior
Producer "Vox Romana"




> In a message dated 12/2/2005 8:04:07 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> rory12001@y... writes:
> I am the producer of Vox Romana which is the radio, "podcast"
> meaning computer radio station. We were to debut for the Ludi
Plebei
> in honour of Iuppiter OP and the Plebians but some of our
> correspondants had computer problem so it will be delayed for a
month
> or two, but not two worry I shall post & let everyone know our
debut
> broadcast!
> So you are putting up the money to pay for the broadcast?
> How $$ much is involved, and how do you get it back?
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40229 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-03
Subject: Re: Eheu..... Hortensia (my candidacy)
M. Hortensia P. Strabonis G. Catonisque spd;
Salve Po and Cato, actually Pompeia well knows all the
struggle to put on games as she has worked so hard for the Megalesia,
which is a great thing and why she and Gaius Buteo Modianus will be
such a good team as Consuls. Understanding and respect & knowledge.

That is why I suggested Albucius run for plebian aedile with me, as
Cato says, it respects principals of Roman gov't and frankly I simply
cannot put on two games! It is really difficult. I am not wonder
woman - I don't have a cohors & there is the great Certamen.

& it is precisely that so many people admire Albucius that I wish to
work in a cooperative way. Just like I found Gaius Buteo Modianus was
a great guy by talking with him. I think that by working on the Ludi
we can become friends.
bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior

Post Scriptum: Skype now has video! http//www.skype.com/
>
> So, Albucius, in all possible amity, I would encourage you to instead
> move on to the aedileship, which is in need of another candidate. I
> think you would agree that it is exceedingly important to keep the
> correct form of the government.
>
> Vale et valete,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40230 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Founder's Interview, etc.
C. Minucius Hadrianus Felix Q. Fabio Maximo S.P.D.

Salve.

QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:

> So you are putting up the money to pay for the broadcast?
> How $$ much is involved, and how do you get it back?
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
> \

You may want to read these - it should clear things up:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podcasting
http://help.ziepod.com/index.php?pid=050811091346
http://audiofeeds.org/tutorial.php


Vale bene,
--
Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix
Pontifex et Minervae Aedis Sacerdos
Legate Massachusetts Regio
c.minucius.hadrianus@...

"We are all, so far as we inherit the civilization of Europe,
still citizens of the Roman Empire, and time as not yet proved
Virgil wrong when he wrote /nec tempora pono: imperium sine fine dedi./"

-T.S. Eliot

"/His ego nec metas rerum nec tempora pono: imperium sine fine dedi./"

"For the achievement of these people I fix neither spatial boundaries or
temporal limits: I have given them empire without end."

-Virgil, /Aeneid/ I.278,279
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40231 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Asking other Citizens to Serve
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Tiberio Galerio Paulino salutem dicit

I believe what Pompeia Minucia Tiberia, and perhaps others are trying to
insinuate (and I do not speak for them), is that it is one thing to ask
others to stand for office and it is another to ask people to stand for
office that are going to stand for office and let another pull their
strings, and speak for them.

The problem with Gaius Geminius Germanus is that his announcement as a
candidate was two very short sentances. Several of us in Nova Roma do not
know him, and are not aware of what he is capable of. It seems problematic
to support such a candidate based on one persons endorsement. Especially,
in light of the fact that Praetor is a window into the Senate, and we have
had Praetors in the past who have not been communicative to the populace.
We don't need Praetors who are going to issue two sentance statements, and
remain silent. Surely this man can let the people know why he would do a
good job? Surely he can list some of his qualifications.

The problem is not that someone was asked to run by someone else. The
potential problem is that someone *might* be only running at the request of
another, to support another, and to make it easier for another if both are
elected (ie., by not being an independant magistrate). This, I believe, is
the point others were trying to make.

I would very much like to hear why Gaius Geminius Germanus wants to be
praetor, and how he will do.

Vale;

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 12/3/05, Tim Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Senator Pompeia Minucia Tiberia presumptive Consul of Nova Roma who
> said in part
>
> "I can only hope that our silent Praetoral candidate is not running
> solely at the request of Galerius Paulinus, but I shall leave the
> candidate in question to answer that"
>
> Whither Gaius Geminius Germanus speaks for himself is as you say up to him
> but
>
> I will comment. No I did not ask him to stand but what if I had, what's
> wrong with that ?
> I have asked a number of people to stand for office. Some have said yes
> and others have said no.
> While others I asked have decided to stand for a different office
> then what I had advised them to stand for.
> So unless I am missing something it should be the duty of EVERY Nova Roman
> to ask others to serve
> and to offer themselves as candidates.
>
> Earlier this week unbeknownst to the other both Caius Minucius Scaevola
> and
> I were hard at work looking for a candidate to stand for Magister
> Aranearius.
> Instead of have no candidates for this most important office we each found
> a Nova Roman
> willing to stand and serve. Regardless of who wins this race Nova Roma
> wins.
>
> Senator Pompeia Minucia Tiberia presumptive Consul of Nova Roma
> have you asked anybody to stand and serve? If you did THANK YOU
>
> If not Why not?
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Candidate for Praetor


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40232 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: prid. Non.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est pridie Nonas Decembris; haec dies comitialis est.

"The consuls were the first to be sent, little more than half-clothed,
under the yoke, then each in the order of his rank was exposed to the
same disgrace, and finally, the legionaries one after another. Around
them stood the enemy fully armed, reviling and jeering at them; swords
were pointed at most of them, and when they offended their victors by
showing their indignation and resentment too plainly some were wounded
and even killed. Thus were they marched under the yoke. But what was
still harder to bear was that after they had emerged from the pass
under the eyes of the foe though, like men dragged up from the jaws of
hell, they seemed to behold the light for the first time, the very
light itself, serving only to reveal such a hideous sight as they
marched along, was more gloomy than any shape of death. They could
have reached Capua before nightfall, but not knowing how their allies
would receive them, and kept back by a feeling of shame, they all
flung themselves, destitute of everything, on the sides of the road
near Capua. As soon as news of this reached the place, a proper
feeling of compassion for their allies got the better of the inborn
disdain of the Campanian; they immediately sent to the consuls their
own insignia of office, the fasces and the lictors, and the soldiers
they generously supplied with arms, horses, clothes, and provisions.
As they entered Capua the senate and people came out in a body to meet
them, showed them all due hospitality, and paid them all the
consideration to which as individuals and as members of an allied
state they were entitled. But all the courtesies and kindly looks and
cheerful greetings of their allies were powerless to evoke a single
word or even to make them lift up their eyes and look in the face the
friends who were trying to comfort them. To such an extent did
feelings of shame make their gloom and despondency all the heavier,
and constrain them to shun the converse and society of men. The next
day some young nobles were commissioned to escort them to the
frontier. On their return they were summoned to the Senate-house, and
in answer to inquiries on the part of the older senators they reported
that they seemed to be much more gloomy and depressed than the day
before; the column moved along so silently that they might have been
dumb; the Roman mettle was cowed; they had lost their spirit with
their arms; they saluted no man, nor did they return any man's
salutation; not a single man had the power to open his mouth for fear
of what was coming; their necks were bowed as if they were still
beneath the yoke. The Samnites had won not only a glorious victory but
a lasting one; they had not only captured Rome as the Gauls had done
before them, but, what was a still more warlike exploit, they had
captured the Roman courage and hardihood." - Livy, History of Rome 9.6



"Zeus had intercourse with Metis, who turned into many shapes in order
to avoid his embraces. When she was with child, Zeus, taking time by
the forelock, swallowed her, because Earth said that, after giving
birth to the maiden who was then in her womb, Metis would bear a son
who should be the lord of heaven. From fear of that Zeus swallowed
her. And when the time came for the birth to take place, Prometheus
or, as others say, Hephaestus, smote the head of Zeus with an axe, and
Athena, fully armed, leaped up from the top of his head at the river
Triton." - Apollodorus, Library and Epitome 1.3.6

"Truly, a cloud of forgetfulness sometimes descends unexpectedly, and
draws the straight path of action away from the mind. For they climbed
the hill without bringing the seed of burning flame; and they
established the sacred precinct on the acropolis with fireless
sacrifices. Zeus brought to them a yellow cloud and rained on them
abundant gold. And the gray-eyed goddess herself bestowed on them
every art, so that they surpassed all mortal men as the best workers
with their hands; and the roads bore works of art like living, moving
creatures, and their fame was profound. For a wise craftsman, even
superior skill is free from guile." - Pindar, Odes ("Olympian" 7.45)

"They celebrate a yearly festival of Athena, where their maidens are
separated into two bands and fight each other with stones and sticks,
thus (they say) honoring in the way of their ancestors that native
goddess whom we call Athena. Maidens who die of their wounds are
called false virgins. Before the girls are set fighting, the whole
people choose the fairest maid, and arm her with a Corinthian helmet
and Greek panoply, to be then mounted on a chariot and drawn all along
the lake shore. With what armor they equipped their maidens before
Greeks came to live near them, I cannot say; but I suppose the armor
was Egyptian; for I maintain that the Greeks took their shield and
helmet from Egypt. As for Athena, they say that she was daughter of
Poseidon and the Tritonian lake, and that, being for some reason angry
at her father, she gave herself to Zeus, who made her his own
daughter. Such is their tale. The intercourse of men and women there
is promiscuous; they do not cohabit but have intercourse like cattle.
When a woman's child is well grown, the men assemble within three
months and the child is adjudged to be that man's whom it is most
like." - Herodotus, The Histories CLXXX.2-6

Today is sacred to Minerva, the goddess of wisdom, war, the arts,
industry, justice and skill, known to the Greeks as Athena.

An oracle foretold to Zeus, the king of the gods, that if his wife
Metis bore another child it would be a boy who would depose him. He
promptly swallowed Metis, but was later smitten by terrible pains in
his head --- Metis had begun making her daughter's armor while inside
Iuppiter's head. Mercury, the messenger of the gods, suspected the
cause, and persuaded Vulcan, the god of fire, to split his head open.
Immediately Minerva leapt out, fully grown and in full armour. She
became his favourite child, and he gave her his shield, the aegis,
which bore the image of the gorgon Medusa, and the thunderbolt. She
is the virgin mother of Erichthnonius.

Minerva and Neptune were very fond of a certain city in Greece. Both
of them claimed the city, it was decided that the one that could give
the finest gift should have it. Neptune struck the side of the cliff
with his trident and a spring welled up. The people marveled, but the
water was as salty as Neptune's sea and it was not very useful.
Minerva's gift was an olive tree, which was better because it gave the
people food, oil and wood. Minerva (as the Greek Athena) named her
city Athens.

Minerva's companion is the goddess of victory, Nike, and her usual
attribute is the owl. Sacred to her are the olive, serpent, owl,
lance, and crow. As Minerva Medica, she is the goddess of medicine
and doctors.

In 207 B.C., a guild of poets and actors was formed to meet and make
votive offerings at the temple of Minerva on the Aventine hill. Among
others, its members included Livius Andronicus. The Aventine sanctuary
of Minerva continued to be an important center of the arts for much of
the middle Roman Republic. With Iuppiter and Iuno, she forms the
great Capitoline Triad of gods.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy, Minerva (http://waltm.net/athena.htm) and
(http://www.minervatech.u-net.com/minerva.htm)and
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minerva)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40233 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Asking other Citizens to Serve
---Good Morning Tiberius Galerius Paulinus!:


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tim Gallagher" <spqr753@m...> wrote:
>
> Salve Senator Pompeia Minucia Tiberia presumptive Consul of Nova
Roma who said in part
>
> "I can only hope that our silent Praetoral candidate is not
running
> solely at the request of Galerius Paulinus, but I shall leave the
> candidate in question to answer that"
>
> Whither Gaius Geminius Germanus speaks for himself is as you say
up to him but
>
> I will comment. No I did not ask him to stand but what if I
had, what's wrong with that ?



Pompeia: Rather disproportionately defensive now, don't you think
Galeri?.....over one comment and question. There is nothing wrong
with asking him to stand in itself! My, I have certainly ruffled
your feathers..

The key word here I don't think you applied is 'soley', Galerius.

If this apparently rather bashful Praetoral candidate is running
for other reasons, service to the republic, etc. as *well* as being
a running mate who thinks very much like you, apparently, then I
suppose this is -somewhat- more comforting. Umm, it would sure be
even -more- comforting if he would speak about his own reasoning and
platform, as opposed to your doing it for him.

I would venture to say he might get a few more votes.

I don't think people will just up and vote for him, because he has
the same agenda as you, and allows you to speak for him...you say
he's cool, he then he must be....no...no....

And you get defensive when I am so bold as to say so? Well, this is
not totally atypical.


This is, however, why I likely will not vote for you Galerius: your
consistently demonstrated inability to cope well with other opinions
throughout the year.


The people you propose to serve would like someone who will look at
their needs and entertain their opinions no? But... it seems you
know best and that is that.

I believe it was a citizen in NR who coined the term 'Nanny knows
best' for this sor of philosophy of service to the populace.




> I have asked a number of people to stand for office. Some have
said yes and others have said no.
> While others I asked have decided to stand for a different office
then what I had advised them to stand for.
> So unless I am missing something it should be the duty of EVERY
Nova Roman to ask others to serve
> and to offer themselves as candidates.


Pompeia: That's wonderful Galerius. Really, good for you.


>
> Earlier this week unbeknownst to the other both Caius Minucius
Scaevola and
> I were hard at work looking for a candidate to stand for Magister
Aranearius.
> Instead of have no candidates for this most important office we
each found a Nova Roman
> willing to stand and serve. Regardless of who wins this race Nova
Roma wins.

>
> Senator Pompeia Minucia Tiberia presumptive Consul of Nova Roma
> have you asked anybody to stand and serve? If you did THANK YOU


Pompeia: Well, Quaestor, I certainly have made recommendations
where I've felt appropriate! We have some talented, wise citizens
out there, whose participation in an office would be of enormous
blessing to the republic.

...... but I will not ask anyone to stand for office, then run their
campaign for them, making statements of 'we will do this and we'll
do that' akin to a Praetoral 'Little Me'....

I do not advocate a clientalia/patronis milieu so I don't make moves
that might naturally promote such, therefore lending to corruption
of government.

Am I saying that Geminius is your client? No.I am just saying that
it's got major potential to look that way, I'm afraid.

Someone should send a mail chariot out to Geminius' camp and
advise him that he should issue some independent statements.


Valete!
Pompeia
C.CVRIVO SATVRNINO TITVS OCTAVIVS PIVS PRAETORIBVS 2759 A.V.C.



If not Why not?




>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Candidate for Praetor
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From:
pompeia_minucia_tiberia<mailto:pompeia_minucia_tiberia@y...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 5:17 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Gaius Geminius Germanus for Praetor
>
>
> ---Salve Marce Octavi et Salvete Omnes:
>
> I haven't taken the time to formally endorse any candidate save
> Tullia Scholastica for Rogator, but let me take the time to say
that
> I too shall be voting for Octavius Pius. He will make an
> outstanding Praetor.
>
> I shall be voting for C. Curius Saturninus as well.
>
>
> I realize that the concept of two Praetors working together is
> appealing, but the concept of one Praetoral candidate telling
the
> populace definitively what the other will 'do' makes me a bit
> uncomfortable. How can one endorse a platform that the candidate
has
> not presented in the first place..hmmm
>
> I can only hope that our silent Praetoral candidate is not
running
> soley at the request of Galerius Paulinus, but I shall leave the
> candidate in question to answer that.
>
> Valete,
> Pompeia
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Matt Hucke <hucke@c...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > As colleagues Gaius Geminius Germanus and I will endeavor
to
> fulfill the constitutional
> > > duty to "administer the law " in a judicial and unbiased
manner
> and will monitor the main
> > > list of Nova Roma in the same way. We will do so without
regard
> to individuals and will
> > > strive to apply the law equally .
> > >
> > > As Praetor Gaius Geminius Germanus will endeavor to perform
all
> other duties of his
> > > office according to the best of his abilities and
understanding
> and in adherence to the
> > > Constitution, and laws of Nova Roma .
> >
> > Will he? We haven't had any statement of such from the
candidate
> himself; his
> > declaration of candidacy consisted of only two sentences, in
which
> both his own name
> > and "Quaestor" were spelled incorrectly. Surely an applicant
for
> the Praetorship -
> > and admission to the Senate - should have a resumأ� more than
an
> inch long.
> >
> > I will vote for Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus, whose history
in
> Nova Roma is just
> > as long by the calendar, but far more impressive. Titus
Octavius
> has served well
> > as Quaestor, Magister Aranearius, Accensus and scriba to
several
> senior magistrates,
> > and in several provincial offices.
> >
> > Praetors have jurisdiction over the mailing list. The ideal
> candidate is one who
> > participates regularly in list discussions, and who is even-
> tempered, dedicated,
> > and able to write well. Titus Octavius is all of these.
> >
> > I could not be more pleased in a candidate for Praetor.
> >
> > TITUS OCTAVIUS PIUS FOR PRAETOR!
> >
> > Vale,
> > M. Octavius Germanicus, Consular.
> >
> > --
> > hucke@c...
> > http://www.graveyards.com<http://www.graveyards.com/>
> >
> > "The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than
the
> > voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire
&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=fjrrf
WGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ> Fall of the roman
empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+rom
an+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.
sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA> The fall of the roman
empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the
+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=1
03&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ>
> Roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3
=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=JnsqrFDC
8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-
Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-
unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40234 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Salve:

Essentually, what you did is what I suggested.

I am confused...

In message # 23790 you state: " One now, it grieves me to report. I have
received the resignation of Gaius Iulius Scaurus from Nova Roma and his
various offices. I would ask all Nova Romans to join with me in mourning
this decision, and asking the Di Immortales to prevail upon Scaurus to
reconsider and return to us. I also ask that people not fill this list with
speculations about his reasons."

What you did, and what most magistrates have done in the past is take a
loose interpretation of Lex Cornelia et Maria de civitate eiuranda. Thus,
the need for some sort of new legislation that should clarify the magistrate
resignations. The above Lex could be interpreted many ways, and I believe
it could have been within the realm of our laws for you, or the the other
Consul, to state that you accepted the resignation and not allow for
reinstatement as a magistrate.

While you did accept the resignation of Scaurus, you also accepted his full
self-imposed reinstatement. I believe this was the case, also, for Gaius
Popillius Laenas when he resigned as Tribune. He was allowed to
self-reinstate.

My opinion to allow the Consuls an opportunity to understand fully why a
magistrate has resigned, and have an opportunity to put all the facts
together is essentually what Nova Roma has done in the past. It puts a
different spin on it, but it is primarily the same -- except the "former"
magistrate is not allowed to self-reinstate as was done by Laenas and
Scaurus. It seems innappropriate for someone to leave office, and then
reinstate themselves -- as has been the case. To give a period of time were
others can discuss with them the nature of their departure seems the
compassionate thing to do. Surely Scaurus, and Laenas had reasons for their
departure -- but these reasons were not profound enough to keep them away.

Of course I acknowledge that this practice is not historical. But in a
historical setting we would be seeing each other every single day in a real
world forum, conducting business in a real world environment. Its much
easier to understand a person when you see them everyday.

Its not always easy to find good people to stand for office in Nova Roma.
People who are willing to invest so much time. Compassion seems the better
course of action. But, as I have said, I do acknowledge the ease of making
a resignation effective immediatly. Part of me likes the quick and easy
approach, because it is unemotional and unbending. But I am not convinced
that this is the better way.

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus


On 12/3/05, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes, et salve Buteo,
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus wrote:
>
> > My opinion on resignations is that if a magistrate resigns from public
> > office the Consuls should review the resignation, and discuss it among
> > themselves.
>
> I see that both Cordus and Cato have already replied to this, and I
> agree with them. For all that the intention here is compassionate, the
> implementation of such a process would be utterly contrary to historic
> practice. Magistrates are not dependent on the consuls, and the consuls
> do not have the authority to permit or withold resignation of other
> magistrates within their consular imperium. Some might ask how I can
> say this when I, as consul, accepted an apology from G. Iulius Scaurus.
> My answer is that he had not officially resigned his office at that
> time, since he had not written to the censors or the consuls doing so.
> Resignation messages posted here in the forum are meaningless, and
> remain so. A magistrate resigns by informing whomever the convening
> magistrate of the elective assembly that elected him or her happens to be.
>
> Valete,
>
> -- Marinus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40235 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Upcomming Votes and Magistrate Resignations
---Pompeia Minucia Tiberia Gaio Popillio Populoque S.P.D.

(I think the above is correct)

Anyway, Honoured Consul, upon reading and pondering the message
below, I have decided to render some comments and clarification
where I feel appropriate, if you will bear with me.


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiuspopilliuslaenas"
<gaiuspopillius@g...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Gaius Popillius Laenas Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit,
>
> (snip)
>
> There is one other item that I have promised action on, and that
is
> clarification on resignations of magistrates.
>
> This issue arose early this year. I asked for the input of the
> Senate, my staff, and my colleague. Basically there are two ways
to
> approach it: a grace period allowing for reconsideration after a
> magistrate announces a resignation, or resignation effectively
> immediately.

>
> The majority of the Senate appears to favor effective immediately.

Pompeia Respondeo: Indeed? I must, unfortunately, come forth and
state to the populace, and I shall to chambers later, that I find
this a tad misleading to say the least. The numbers of Senators
involved in any informal discussion are to be kept *in chambers*
until such time as there is a formal Senatus Consultum showing a
required majority of the Senate members agreeing with the subject
matter of the Consultum.

The sheer numbers of Senatores themselves do not jive with your
statement and myself, I shall confine them to the Senate Forum, but
in any case, again, in the absence of a Senatus Consultum your
claims to have the Senate's opinion behind your endeavors here are
unfounded.

> My colleague, Consul Caesar, favors a grace period because he
feels
> an immediately effective resignation is harsh and may cause us to
> lose good magistrates who just experience a period of frustration.
>
> I have decided to present to you for comment, a lex that proposes
> immediately effective resignations of magistrates. The lex also
> provides, although perhaps superfluously, that a resigning
> magistrate who changes his or her mind is free to stand in the
> election for a replacement and let the people decide.
>
> This seems to me the best course of action.

Pompeia; I realize that in #40137, after another citizen suggested
that you allow Caesar Consul time to speak for himself, you thought
better of the situation and stated that you were not trying to more
or less pull any *surprise* moves and that both points of view
should be presented....yours and Caesar's. Fair enough.

I will note, however, that your entire endeavor is no longer
considered an unbiased determination of justice, atleast to this
reader. When you state that you have the senate's backing, which
cannot be said with any accuracy, you are, perhaps without
realizing, suggesting to the populace that a vote against this
proposal by anyone is a vote against the Senates' concensus on
this. Put another way, the folks should vote for this because the
Senate likes it.

An example:

4 out of 5 doctors recommend a certain brand of painreliever. Maybe
only 5 doctors participated in the survey...this sort of thing.

You are saying that the Senate backs the year-long agendae held by
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus, G. Equitius Cato and to a lesser extent
A. Apollonius Cordus. Fine individuals in their own right, but each
with a determined mindset regarding how resignations are 'best'
handled,a policy which can only be attributed to themselves and
others backing it, and not at this point the Senate. I am sure some
Senators agree with their policies, but the majority of the Senate?
Not by any empirical data to date.
>
> I feel Consul Caesar and I have worked very well together this
year
> and I am pleased to call him a friend. I mean no disrespect to
him
> in presenting this; it is just that we disagree.

Pompeia: I am accensus to F. Apulus Caesar Consul and I will not
get into anything regarding dialogue between the two of you..it is
not my place and I likely don't know the whole story, anyway.

I would not assume, though, that he is completely ignorant of what
transpires on this list in his absence...I think that would be a
hasty assumption, although I cannot read his mind, for sure.
Knowing him as I do, I as his consular colleague would definitely
not assume such things. I would also be wary of the assumption that
he has done no work on this issue, despite disagreement between
yourself, Laenus Consul and Caesar on the elements of this issue.

Bottom Line?

If you do not allow the people a choice, Laenus Consul, atleast an
opportunity for the people to examine any possible proposal of
Caesar consul, then I fear that message #40137 is rather meaningless
prose. And it will appear that you are offering the people not
a 'choice' but an 'ultimatim'...a 'nanny knows best' deal. Is that
truly how you wish to end your term, sir?



There are 31 days in December, and I'm sure another day or two will
not compell the wheels of progress or justice to a grinding halt. I
will not discuss the Consul's absence this weekend other than it is
rather necessary and unavoidable.

Valete
Pompeia Minucia Tiberia Senatrix
Accensus Consularis
F. Apulus Caesar 2758 A.U.C.
>
> The proposed text follows:
>
>
>
> Lex Popillia de Magistratu Eiurando
> >
> > I. A magistrate who resigns his magistracy shall
> > immediately and irrevocably cease to hold that
> > magistracy.
> >
> > II. A magistrate who announces his resignation of
> > citizenship shall immediately and irrevocably cease
> > to hold any and all his magistracies.
> >
> > III. A magistrate who resigns his magistracy and
> > later changes his or her mind, may stand as a candidate
> > in the election to fill the vacancy without penalty.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40236 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modianus quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

You are again correct, Modianus, in that the path you advocate has
been followed in the past. But I believe it was incorrect to do so
then, and to persist in error is neither wise nor compassionate.

And root of the problem is, in fact, that not only is it unhistorical,
but that many of us feel that even what law Nova Roma has regarding
the issue was improperly applied --- *not* out of malice but out of
confusion. Before the lex Cornelia et Maria &c. was amended, it was
pretty much impossible to make sense of it alongside the Constitution;
even after having been amended, it is still a source of
misunderstanding, which has lead to a series of unfortunate events and
culminated in the call for a clear resignation law.

The idea of co-option (when a group of magistrates simply choose
someone to fill a vacancy in their ranks) is abhorrent to Roman
republican political thought; once again, I emphasize that the
authority to grant magisterial power resides *only* in the People.
The consuls, the praetors, the tribunes --- none of them have the
authority to co-opt colleagues, no matter how well-meaning such an
action might be.

What is interesting is that resignations are *not* a matter of us
running physically into a Forum where we see each other every day ---
an impulsive, spur-of-the-moment act which would be possible if we
lived together in a physical community. It takes a conscious decision
to sit at the computer, write a resignation, and then choose to hit
the "send" button.

Your compassion is admirable, but it opens the door for such a host of
problems that it would end up doing much more harm than good --- and
would keep the waters around the resignation issue clouded with
questions and doubt.

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40237 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Upcomming Votes and Magistrate Resignations
C. Equitius Cato P. Minuciae-Tiberiae Straboni Q. Popillio Laeno
quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Pompeia Strabo, you are absolutely correct when you say that I have
been at this for the past year. My feelings about resignation have
never been hidden, and I am not going to change them.

I think you are being a bit unfair to the consul, however. The way I
read his post was simply that, in the course of his deliberations, he
spoke to members of the Senate. No-where did he state that the senate
agreed with him either in any specific individual case or as a body
--- just that he had included some senators in the course of his
thinking about the issue.

Now it just so happens that the consul and I agree on the basic
premise that resignations should be effective immediately; I know you
disagree with this, and I fear that you have let your dislike for it
(and the fact that I have been so vocal about supporting this view)
cloud your approach to the consul's post.

I don't think the consul would like to be painted with the same brush
as me, so I encourage you to fire away at me, but do not look for
injury where none is present. It is neither responsible nor fair, two
attributes the Republic will be looking for in its consuls for 2759.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40238 From: marcushoratius Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Question For M. Moravius Horatianus (Census)
Salve Quinte Pauline

In the four years of its existence SVR has been steadily growing.
Preferred is a slow measured growth, and SVR believes it
accomplishes such by providing active discussion in its Forum and
quality information at its website, along with a amiable
atmosphere. SVR has never had a flame war in its Forum. A couple
of incidents with individuals, in the one case with a woman who
wished to use our Forum to bash Christians. All religions are to be
respected in SVR, not just tolerated, and when we pointed this out
to her the woman left. We have had one political clash that caused
two sodales to resign, but politics is not a big interest in SVR as
it is in Nova Roma. New Regulae were just written and passed,
reorganizing SVR, in order to reduce and concentrate the number of
officers to what the societas actually needs to maintain its
organiztion. SVR operates more as a sodalitas. So we have yet to
see what benefits this may produce.

Activity in SVR drops off in summer months, as people are away on
vacation, or being on holiday from school don not have access to a
computer. That was also part of the problem with the census, as
reported by a number of propraetores, that it was conducted in
summer months. It compares in some respects with Nova Roma: about
33% of the subscribers to SVR's Forum are sodales. However SVR
works differently than Nova Roma. In order to remain a sodalis one
has to be active on the website, in the Forum, or in elections
within a six month period. So once or twice a years SVR does what
would be comparable to a census. Each year we see a large portion -
30-40% - of subscribers move on. We have seen one year when we lost
a good portion of our sodales, too, when we switched servers.

Originally, of course, SVR was founded by cives of Nova Roma. It
has changed much since then. Almost half of the sodales are current
or former members of Nova Roma, and most of our other sodales have
never heard of Nova Roma. We do occasionally receive new members
from Nova Roma, and there seemed to have been a peak of Nova Romans
coming into SVR the summer of last year as disputes were going on in
Nova Roma over religious issues. Most new subscribers, and new
sodales, find SVR while doing research at universities, and we
encourage sodales to share their university work in our Forum. Ages
range from 14 to 68, I believe, with the majority of our sodales
working on bachelor degrees. Lately we have seen a growth among
sodales who are working on advanced degrees.

What the leadership of SVR feels has made such a difference is the
respectful decorum maintained in the Forum and the friendly
atmosphere that sodales promote. Political discussions are referred
to the Comitia, which only sodales are permitted to join, so that
the main Forum and the fora of SVR's collegia are not intruded into
by discussion over internal issues. SVR's sodales are not too
concerned about organizational matters and prefer instead to just be
active in the collegia. The leadership works together according to
consensus, and when differences of opinion occur it works out
compromises in order to reach a consensus. If a minority cannot
agree to the compromise and a consensus thus cannot be reached, we
generally respect the minority opinion, offering concessions on
their position. So even though each year the leadership is joined by
newer sodales, and we encourage new sodales to participate in the
leadership, SVR has managed to maintain a collective working
relationship in its leadership. That has prevented the kind of
disruptive atmosphere that can ruin any organization. It has,
therefore, been a combination of things that has assisted in
retaining sodales. The website has been a contributing factor in
gaining new members, but here again I think it has really been the
friendly atmosphere of SVR's fora that really has attracted
subscribers to join SVR as sodales.

Vale optime
M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
(Michael Kelly)" <mjk@d...> wrote:
>
> Salve M. Moravi Horatian,
>
> I am glad to see a few more citizens stepping up to the plate
today
> in order to run for office; good show!
>
> I just have a question though with regards to the population
decline
> in NR. Now in message 40140, Gaius Aurelius Scipio (Chuck) pointed
> out that there has been a noticeable trend in the drop of
> populations in various historical type societies such as American
> Civil War reenactment etc. I also noticed in your platform that
you
> held some previous high positions in the SVR. Now I have never
> visited that group so I was wondering if over the last 3 or 4
years
> it was growing slow, exponentially, peaked and stayed level or
began
> to decline drastically in the same time period. If the SVR is
indeed
> increasing continually in population, is there anything NR can
learn
> from this society as far as recruitment and retention of citizens
> go?
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40239 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Upcomming Votes and Magistrate Resignations
---Salvete Equitius Cato:

My brief comments below:


(snip)

You write in part (regarding Laenus Consul's assertions)
>
> No-where did he state that the senate
> agreed with him either in any specific individual case or as a body
> --- just that he had included some senators in the course of his
> thinking about the issue.

Pompeia: The Consul stated 'the majority of the Senate seems to
favour (the resignation policy) effective immediately' No, he
didn't say some senators, he implied that he perceived the general
consensus of the Senate was in favour of his policies. I find that
a tad misleading, and any chit chat in the Senate amongst a few
Senators is not an official consultum...nor can it be perceived as a
quorum. And it should not be discussed as such outside chambers.

I'm sorry that upsets you so terribly Equitius Cato. I can't 'not'
say things because you might find them upsetting. Let us not allow
our passions for a given policy to get in the way of what was
said/implied vs what was in fact 'not' said/implied. Goodness.

At any rate, I'll leave the readership to judge my words, and my
motivations.

Pompeia Minucia Tiberia
Senatrix
>
> Now it just so happens that the consul and I agree on the basic
> premise that resignations should be effective immediately; I know
you
> disagree with this, and I fear that you have let your dislike for
it
> (and the fact that I have been so vocal about supporting this view)
> cloud your approach to the consul's post.
>
> I don't think the consul would like to be painted with the same
brush
> as me, so I encourage you to fire away at me, but do not look for
> injury where none is present. It is neither responsible nor fair,
two
> attributes the Republic will be looking for in its consuls for
2759.
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40240 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Salve:

Cato, I understand the position you are taking. Let me put my thoughts a
different way.

A resignation has to be recognized before it becomes true.

A magistrate could say to himself in private, "I resign my office." Does
that mean that the magistrate is no longer a magistrate? Or does the
magistrate have to announce that he is no longer a magistrate? Who is a
valid witness to a resignation?

If I walk up to another citizen in a "real world event" and tell them, "I
resign from my office," is that a sufficient resignation? Or does it need
to be done on the main list?

Hypathetical situation:

A magistrate calls one of the Consuls on the phone and tells the Consul, "I
resign my office." Is that Consul then duty bound to accept the
resignation, and end the call -- AS SOON as the words "I resign" are
stated. What if... at the end of the phone conversation the magistrate
states, "OK I changed my mind, I'll stay." Should the Consul then be duty
bound to post to the forum, "Magistrate X in a phone conversation with me
resigned their office, but then tried to take back the resignation. Taking
back the resignation is not allowed..."

What is the basis of witnessing a resignation? Censor Marinus indicated
recently that posting a resignation on the main list was not in and of
itself a resignation. Would not real world resignations have more
"weight." But then we get into a situation were the resigning magistrate
could come back and state, "I really didn't say it that way."

The question could come up that all resignations need to be made via an
e-mail. Well, what if a magistrate needs to resign because they no longer
have e-mail access. They are stuck in office. We cannot claim to be more
than a virtual community if we mandate e-mail as the only official means of
communication.

With one possible solution we open up the possibility of other potential
problems. I am NOT advocating co-option. I am advocating that a process be
in place to evaluate the resignation before it is recognized by the state.

Another example...

Lets say my wife hates Nova Roma (she does not for the record, and is a
citizen herself), and uses my computer and my e-mail account to post a
resignation on the main list. This could be done by someone with access to
my computer (ie., my wife, or by anyone who can hack into my e-mail). If
the resignation takes affect immediatly then I have no recourse. If there
is a process were my resignation can be evaluated before it is formally
acknowledged then it would be determined that I did not issue the
resignation. No "co-option" is necessary, the resignation was considered
from someone posing as me.

Resignations can also be made under duress. We do not have the benefit of
being with one another on a daily basis.

The problem is NOT about co-option, it is about when the resignation becomes
effective.

Some, like yourself, would indicate that it effective by the very fact that
a resignation was issued and is effective immediatly. I would propose that
an investigation be done, and a waiting period be implemented to make sure
there was no duress in the issuing of the resignation.

Vale;

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 12/4/05, gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modianus quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salve et salvete.
>
> You are again correct, Modianus, in that the path you advocate has
> been followed in the past. But I believe it was incorrect to do so
> then, and to persist in error is neither wise nor compassionate.
>
> And root of the problem is, in fact, that not only is it unhistorical,
> but that many of us feel that even what law Nova Roma has regarding
> the issue was improperly applied --- *not* out of malice but out of
> confusion. Before the lex Cornelia et Maria &c. was amended, it was
> pretty much impossible to make sense of it alongside the Constitution;
> even after having been amended, it is still a source of
> misunderstanding, which has lead to a series of unfortunate events and
> culminated in the call for a clear resignation law.
>
> The idea of co-option (when a group of magistrates simply choose
> someone to fill a vacancy in their ranks) is abhorrent to Roman
> republican political thought; once again, I emphasize that the
> authority to grant magisterial power resides *only* in the People.
> The consuls, the praetors, the tribunes --- none of them have the
> authority to co-opt colleagues, no matter how well-meaning such an
> action might be.
>
> What is interesting is that resignations are *not* a matter of us
> running physically into a Forum where we see each other every day ---
> an impulsive, spur-of-the-moment act which would be possible if we
> lived together in a physical community. It takes a conscious decision
> to sit at the computer, write a resignation, and then choose to hit
> the "send" button.
>
> Your compassion is admirable, but it opens the door for such a host of
> problems that it would end up doing much more harm than good --- and
> would keep the waters around the resignation issue clouded with
> questions and doubt.
>
> Vale et valete,
>
> Cato


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40241 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Upcomming Votes and Magistrate Resignations
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Equitio Catoni salutem dicit

Gaius Popillius Laenas did indicate:

"This issue arose early this year. I asked for the input of the Senate, my
staff, and my colleague. Basically there are two ways to approach it: a
grace period allowing for reconsideration after a
magistrate announces a resignation, or resignation effectively immediately.

The majority of the Senate appears to favor effective immediately. My
colleague, Consul Caesar, favors a grace period because he feels an
immediately effective resignation is harsh and may cause us to lose good
magistrates who just experience a period of frustration."

If Laenas had spoken to only a few senators then he should have said, "I
asked for the input of some senators..." and likewise, "The majority of the
senators that I spoke with appear to favor.."

I assumed that the Consul had convened the senate to discuss this issue, and
that the majority of the senators favored an immediate resignation policy,
exactly as the Consul had indicated. If this is not true, then why was it
presented in such a way as to state that the senate agrees with Leanas while
Consul Caesar disagrees with the senate.

If it was stated that Laenas believes in an immediate resignation policy,
and the senate too agrees in an immediate resignation policy, and that
Consul Caesar agrees in a grace period then it has to follow that according
to his words Laenas wrote that the senate agrees with him and that the
senate disagrees with Caesar.

You stated, "No-where did he state that the senate agreed with him either in
any specific individual case or as a body --- just that he had included some
senators in the course of his
thinking about the issue." This is simply not true. Leanas used the
phrase, "I asked for the input of the Senate" and "The majority of the
Senate." The use of the word SENATE indicates the collective body of
senators. The singular senator would indicate individual senators.

I think Laenas does imply that he has senate support for his proposed Lex.
This may be true, as I am not a senator and am not aware of what goes on in
the senate. Pompeia Strabo is a senator, and as such is more informed to
the inner workings of the senate. Additionally, I do not believe Leanas
made his statement with malicious intent! I don't believe he posted what he
did as you say, but he very may well have intended to post as you say.

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 12/4/05, gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato P. Minuciae-Tiberiae Straboni Q. Popillio Laeno
> quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> Pompeia Strabo, you are absolutely correct when you say that I have
> been at this for the past year. My feelings about resignation have
> never been hidden, and I am not going to change them.
>
> I think you are being a bit unfair to the consul, however. The way I
> read his post was simply that, in the course of his deliberations, he
> spoke to members of the Senate. No-where did he state that the senate
> agreed with him either in any specific individual case or as a body
> --- just that he had included some senators in the course of his
> thinking about the issue.
>
> Now it just so happens that the consul and I agree on the basic
> premise that resignations should be effective immediately; I know you
> disagree with this, and I fear that you have let your dislike for it
> (and the fact that I have been so vocal about supporting this view)
> cloud your approach to the consul's post.
>
> I don't think the consul would like to be painted with the same brush
> as me, so I encourage you to fire away at me, but do not look for
> injury where none is present. It is neither responsible nor fair, two
> attributes the Republic will be looking for in its consuls for 2759.
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40242 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Modianus, you make some interesting points, and I do not simply
dismiss them; the trouble is that if we tried to encompass every
possible situation and allow for every single vagary of human
existence, it could quite possibly end up being impossible to resign
an office :-)

The law is clear that it would not be by casual conversation or any
method other than a public announcement before the group from whom the
magistrate received his authority (i.e., whichever comitia elected him).

Once a magistrate writes to the Forum and says, "I resign my office",
it should be done. We are adults here (or at least the magistrates
must be). Let us act like adults and take full responsibility for our
own actions.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40243 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Questions for Candidates
Salve Gai Fabi, et salvete omnes,

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus wrote:

> I am confused...

Apparently we both are.

> In message # 23790 you state: " One now, it grieves me to report. I have
> received the resignation of Gaius Iulius Scaurus from Nova Roma and his
> various offices. I would ask all Nova Romans to join with me in mourning
> this decision, and asking the Di Immortales to prevail upon Scaurus to
> reconsider and return to us. I also ask that people not fill this list with
> speculations about his reasons."

Memory, they say, is the second thing to go. It seems to be going for me.

Thanks for researching that, as it jogs my memory into remembering the
sad events of a year and a half ago. Scaurus did send me and the
censors a private message, resigning his citizenship and offices.
Because he included his citizenship in the mix, we concluded that the
whole fell under the "resignation nundinum" rule at the time.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40244 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Upcomming Votes and Magistrate Resignations
C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano P. Minuciae-Tiberiae
Straboni quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

My apologies; I had overlooked that sentence in the consul's
statement; in my head I read it as I suggested in my post to Pompeia
Strabo. My head is a fascinating and fun-filled place, but
occasionally things get lost in it.

I still believe the consul to have written in good faith, and only
hope that that consideration will be given him.

I apologoze to Pompeia Strabo if I spoke too hastily.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40245 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-04
Subject: Re: Upcomming Votes and Magistrate Resignations
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Equitio Catoni salutem dicit

I too believe Consul Laenas wrote in good faith, I have no reason to believe
otherwise. I too get lost in my own mind, so I fully understand :)

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 12/4/05, gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano P. Minuciae-Tiberiae
> Straboni quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> My apologies; I had overlooked that sentence in the consul's
> statement; in my head I read it as I suggested in my post to Pompeia
> Strabo. My head is a fascinating and fun-filled place, but
> occasionally things get lost in it.
>
> I still believe the consul to have written in good faith, and only
> hope that that consideration will be given him.
>
> I apologoze to Pompeia Strabo if I spoke too hastily.
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]