Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Dec 23-31, 2005

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40948 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40949 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: Lex Grylla de Magistratibus Plebus Creandis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40950 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40951 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia! - Merry Christmas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40952 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40953 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - legal discussion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40954 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: Lex Grylla de Magistratibus Plebus Creandis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40955 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: Lex Grylla de Magistratibus Plebus Creandis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40956 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: New file uploaded to Nova-Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40957 From: Bryce Rumbles Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40958 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: Lex Grylla de Magistratibus Plebus Creandis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40959 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Edictum Censoris CFBQ XLI about the the correction of the family fa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40960 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40961 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40962 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: Kwanza vs, religious holidays
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40963 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40964 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: Re: Kwanza vs, religious holidays
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40965 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40966 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: In Expectio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40967 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: Re: In Expectio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40968 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: Salve from a missing Tribune and his point of view.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40969 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40970 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: Re: Edictum Censoris CFBQ XLI about the the correction of the famil
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40971 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: a.d IX Kal. Ian.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40972 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: Re: Edictum Censoris CFBQ XLI about the the correction of the famil
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40973 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: Re: Lex Grylla de Magistratibus Plebus Creandis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40974 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-25
Subject: a.d. VIII Kal. Ian.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40975 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-12-25
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40976 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-12-25
Subject: Re: Edictum Censoris CFBQ XLI about the the correction of the famil
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40977 From: robertpartlow Date: 2005-12-25
Subject: felix Saturnalia, Christmas, Chanukah, etc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40978 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-25
Subject: Re: Edictum Censoris CFBQ XLI about the the correction of the famil
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40979 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-25
Subject: Re: felix Saturnalia, Christmas, Chanukah, etc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40980 From: robertpartlow Date: 2005-12-25
Subject: Re: felix Saturnalia, Christmas, Chanukah, etc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40981 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-25
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40982 From: Bryce Rumbles Date: 2005-12-25
Subject: Greetings from a newbie
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40983 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-26
Subject: a.d. VII Kal. Ian.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40984 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-26
Subject: Re: felix Saturnalia, Christmas, Chanukah, etc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40985 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-26
Subject: Absent
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40986 From: FAC Date: 2005-12-26
Subject: Wishes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40987 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2005-12-26
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40988 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-26
Subject: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40989 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-12-27
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40990 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-27
Subject: a.d. VI Kal. Ian.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40991 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-27
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40992 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-27
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40993 From: Tiberius Antonius Romulus Date: 2005-12-27
Subject: Eras Rome owned Mesopatamia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40994 From: Susan Davis Date: 2005-12-27
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40995 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2005-12-27
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40996 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-12-27
Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia! - Merry Christmas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40997 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40998 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40999 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41000 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: a.d. V Kal. Ian.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41001 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41002 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41003 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: EDICTVM CENSORIVM DE SENATU
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41004 From: Titus Marcius Felix Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41005 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41006 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: YAHOO GROUPS DOWN TIME TONIGHT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41007 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia! - Merry Christmas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41008 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41009 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41010 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41011 From: Susan Davis Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41012 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41013 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: Eras Rome owned Mesopatamia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41014 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: EDICTVM CENSORIVM DE SENATU
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41015 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: a.d. IV Kal. Ian.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41016 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: Re: EDICTVM CENSORIVM DE SENATU
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41017 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: The Senate is in Session
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41018 From: rory kirshner Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: Re: Fwd: Senatus Consultum - Report
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41019 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: Re: Fwd: Senatus Consultum - Report
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41020 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41021 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41022 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41023 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: Re: Fwd: Senatus Consultum - Report
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41024 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: Re: Fwd: Senatus Consultum - Report
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41025 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Fwd: Senatus Consultum - Report
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41026 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: a.d. III Kal. Ian.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41027 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Fwd: Senatus Consultum - Report
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41028 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41029 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Fwd: Senatus Consultum - Report
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41030 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Fwd: Senatus Consultum - Report
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41031 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41032 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41033 From: Marcus Iulius Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: NR Forum: one year of moderation, and an edictum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41034 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Edictum VI of Propraetor Cn. Cornelius Lentulus about appointing Pr
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41035 From: Marcus Iulius Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Edictum Praetoricium IV - De Foro et Moderatione
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41036 From: marcushoratius Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41037 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Fwd: Senatus Consultum - Report
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41038 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Election Results Need Posted
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41039 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41040 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: [none]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41041 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Translation needed.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41042 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41043 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41044 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Magna Mater website
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41045 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Magna Mater website
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41046 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41047 From: Susan Davis Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: [none]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41048 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41049 From: Cant97 Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Magna Mater website
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41050 From: Susan Davis Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41051 From: Susan Davis Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Magna Mater website
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41052 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41053 From: Susan Davis Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41054 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41055 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41056 From: P. Minucia Tiberia Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: MAGNA MATER PROJECT YEAR END REPORT 2758 A.V.C.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41057 From: ~The Kreick~ Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Translation needed.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41058 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: COHORS CENSORIS CFBQ, 2758 FIRST HALF-YEAR CENSORIAL GENERAL REPORT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41059 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41060 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: A nonv veto veto
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41061 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: COHORS CENSORIS CFBQ, 2758 SECOND HALF-YEAR CENSORIAL GENERAL REPORT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41062 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Fwd: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - convening of the Comitia Plebis Tributa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41064 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Apologies
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41065 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Fwd: Re: [CPT] [Nova-Roma] Re: ELECTIONS - convening of the Comiti
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41066 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Fwd: Re: [CPT] [Nova-Roma] Re: ELECTIONS - convening of the Comiti
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41067 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Apologies
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41068 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Fwd: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - convening of the Comitia Plebis Tribu
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41069 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: the Senate's proposal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41070 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Fwd: Re: [CPT] [Nova-Roma] Re: ELECTIONS -
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41071 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41072 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41073 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal - INTERCESSIO!!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41074 From: rory kirshner Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: the Senate's proposal - INTERCESSIO!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41075 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41076 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41077 From: Paolo Eutimo Cristiano Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Magna Mater website
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41078 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41079 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Fwd: Re: [CPT] [Nova-Roma] Re: ELECTIONS - convening of the Comiti
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41080 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: DE TABVLARIO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41081 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: A nonv veto veto
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41082 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Fwd: Re: [CPT] [Nova-Roma] Re: ELECTIONS - convening of the Comiti
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41083 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41084 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: DE TABVLARIO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41085 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41086 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: And Finally, about Albucius Call for elections and how o get out of
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41087 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41088 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: prid. Kal. Ian.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41089 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41090 From: Cant97 Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Record Issue
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41091 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Record Issue
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41092 From: Cant97 Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Record Issue
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41093 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Record Issue
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41094 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: New Year - Ovid's Fasti
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41095 From: FAC Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Magna Mater website
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41096 From: FAC Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41097 From: FAC Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Magna Mater website
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41098 From: pjane Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41099 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: De interrege
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41100 From: pjane Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Vote of P. Cassia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41101 From: pjane Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Question about this vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41102 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41103 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41104 From: James Mathews Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: New Year's Best Wishes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41105 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: De concilio plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41106 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: De interrege - P.S.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41107 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: A Happy New Year from Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Censor!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41108 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: [none]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41109 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Question about this vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41110 From: Cant97 Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Record Issue
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41111 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: A big Thanks to my Cohors Censoris CFBQ
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41112 From: FAC Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Comitia Populi Centuriata - Results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41113 From: FAC Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Comitia Populi Centuriata - Results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41114 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Congratulations to the newly elected!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41115 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Comitia Populi Centuriata - Results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41116 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Thanks
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41117 From: Legion XXIV Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: [SodalitasMilitarium] New Year's Best Wishes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41118 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Congratulations to the newly elected!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41119 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Question about this vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41120 From: Susan Davis Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41121 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: EDICTVM CENSORIVM DE ADLEGENDIS SENATORIBVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41122 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Question about this vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41123 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re Where are the new Tribunes!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41124 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: DE TABVLARIO



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40948 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
M. Hortensia P. Strabonis, Cordo, Catonis, Octavioque spd;
I vetoed Albucius's edict & declared the election a 'fait
accompli' (what is the Latin;-) around 2 a.m.. thanks to Senatrix
Strabo's quick thinking.

We don't need any fancy theories, English Common Law which
is a descendant of Roman Law has the concept of a 'fictional notice'
[cant think of the real legal term] meaning if no one objects than
it is deemed that you permitted tha action to occur.

Since the tribs forgot to make the announcement in the CPT but the
elections went forward without the legal notice without objection,
we make the assumption that the plebs had their notice....That's it.

Albucius's problems stem from his analysis the leges from an EU
point of view, not Roman law or Roman history.

I propose we bestow upon Albucius the cognomen "Intercessor" for all
his fun uses of his veto power without a positive solution: the
Ludi, the elections....;-)
positively the last time,
Marca Hortensia Maior TRP (Nov. 2005)

Note to Cato: before criticizing us roundly, how about the fact
that Saturninus at the last moment hosted the Plebian Ludi, Fuscus &
I helped him. This was November. Then the majority of us have end of
year exams, papers & Saturnalia, & Christmas and Hannukah!
>
> M. Hortensia Senatrice P. Strabonis spd;
> thank you thank you Senatrix Pompeia Strabo for an
> excellent suggestion; I am very grateful!....I veto Albucius's
> election call, as an election of the Plebians has occurred...I
voted
> in the cista and can affirm that the CPT was listed and candidates
> within as well as the brilliant 'write in' choice...that saves
wear
> and tear on the webmaster, the diribatores & the Quirites so we
> won't need that by-election that my error caused.
> Again my apologies for forgetting to call the CPT,
> bene vale
> M. Hortensia Maior TRP -2005...
>
>
>
>
>
> agree with every sensible, wonderful suggestion below.
> > Pompeia: Not necessarily. You could consider the suggestion
> above.
> > Alternately: there are five of you and a majority of you *could
> > *pronounce intersessio against your most recent election call,
and
> > further: affirm that an election of the Plebian people has
> occurred,
> > although the wrong verbage was employed to convene same, and
thus
> to
> > nix the Plebs' wishes (and likely their interest) by convening a
> new
> > election out of a bad choice of words is against the spirit of
the
> > constitution; further, it potentially compromises the Plebian
(and
> > often Patrician) entitlement to a dissenting voice in government
> > next year, should one be required. I do not wish to see another
> year
> > of contesting Tribune potestas...over technical
snags/ambiguities.
> > It stunts our growth as a republic, this sort of thing, I feel.
> >
> > Quirites.....am I understanding this situation correctly? When
I
> > logged into the cista to vote...there were three comitia
> open...one
> > I could not get in to the Comitia Plebius Tributa of course as a
> > Patrician...but three were listed....could someone tell me that
> > three were *not* listed at the onset of these elections?
> > >
> > > So please find all, in the absence of any answer from my est.
> > > Colleagues, an official convening edict.
> > >
> > > You will thus see that the (official) contio period is tiny
and
> > > falling in Christmas time. So please all (Christians... ;-) )
> > > forgive "us" this. I hope that the fact that we all know well
> now
> >
> > Pompeia: It is not the Christians, Jesus, Santa, Kahless the
> > Unforgettable, whomever,.. you are potentially offending...it is
> the
> > Plebian order within Nova Roma, with respect. Those who elected
> you
> > to represent their rights and needs. Saturnalia ends I believe
> > tomorrow (if you go by Caligula's numbers :)), so I am not sure
> what
> > Christmas has to do with all of this. I know not all vote
> counters
> > are Christians, as a matter of trivia, Honoured Tribune. We
must
> > take care not to compromise Plebian rights to representation
come
> > Ian. I 2759. That is my concern.
> >
> > the
> > > names of our 1 + 5 candidates, and also that there are not
more
> > > runners than open positions, will make debates shorter and
> easier.
> > >
> > > The voting period must legally last 5 days. So votes will be
> able
> > to
> > > be cast till 30/12 midnight Rome time. Here too, please all
> > > diribitores, the magister aranearius and other magistrates and
> > > assistants involved in the process of counting and stating the
> > votes
> > > forgive this extreme schedule.
> > >
> > > I propose, if every constitutional power agrees this proposal,
> > that
> > > the first days of January 2006 could help these last
processings
> > > ending, if necessary. Meanwhile, during the first days of next
> > 2759
> > > auc, our 1+5 candidates will be able to take contact,
> > unofficially,
> > > with their future tasks.
> > >
> > > A by-election will have to be called by the new-elected
Tribunes
> > to
> > > get a 2nd Aedilis Plebis.
> >
> > Pompeia: I think something else can be worked out. But if you
> > insist, and you do not receive intercessio from your collegiae,
> then
> > you may proceed with a new election, and even if your vote
> counters
> > are not doing 'the Christmas thing', they may still be busy....
> in
> > which case, you would have to issue an edictum stating that
since
> no
> > diribitores are available to help you tally the votes, then
> Plebian
> > X and Plebian Y shall be appointed to count votes.....or call
the
> > Senate into session for assistance if you get stuck....as
Tribune
> > you may do that. In either case, this linguistic/technical
hole,
> > with respect to the current cista proceedings, has to be
plugged.
> > That is why edictum were invented I do believe.
> >
> > We have to take steps, one way or the other, to ensure that the
> > legality of this election is affirmed....or...a new one will
> indeed
> > have to be held....that is up to this year's Tribunes....they
have
> > the potestas....
> >
> > Worst case scenerio:
> >
> >
> > I recommend intercessio against this 'new' election if it is
still
> a
> > factor within the next day or so.. (if I understand things
> > correctly) . And even better separately (essentially in my
view),
> > an edictum issued by the majority of Tribunes affirming the
> validity
> > of these recent elections....to safeguard the validity of the
> > potestas of the incoming Tribunes (Tribunes may issue edicta).
> > Likewise in this edictum, I would affirm the validity of the
> > election of the Plebian Aedile.
> >
> > Sorry to 'butt in' as a Patrician, but I believe that Tribunes
are
> > an integral part of the balance of decision making...an integral
> > component of the push/pull checks and balances of our Roman-
based
> > government/judicial system, and their election has to be
> recognized
> > as bona fide and affirmed beyond question....as with any other
> > magisterial election. They play a large role.
> >
> > Valete bene.........Po
> > >
> > > Valete omnes,
> > >
> > > PMA
> > > __________________________________________________
> > >
> > > TRIBUNE P. MEMMIUS ALBUCIUS EDICT
> > > ON THE CONVENING OF THE COMITIA PLEBIS TRIBUTA
> > > (Latin text available on demand)
> > >
> > > I, Publius Memmius Albucius, Tribune of the Plebs, by the
> authority
> > > vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of Nova Roma,
> > >
> > > In view of the Constitution of Nova Roma, specially its
article
> > > III.C., IV.7. and IV.A.5,
> > > In view of my Edict (Dec. 9 12 :57 CPT list) on the annual
> calling
> > > for candidates for the plebeian offices of Tribunes of the
Plebs
> > and
> > > Aediles of the Plebs (« ELECTIONS - PLEBS - 2nd period closed -

> > > OFFICIAL CANDIDACIES »),
> > >
> > > Edicts :
> > >
> > > Article 1
> > >
> > > The Comitia plebis tributa are convened.
> > >
> > > Article 2
> > >
> > > The schedule of this comitial session is the following one :
> > >
> > > - debates (contio) :
> > >
> > > . beginning on December 24, 2005, at 00:00 Rome time ;
> > > . ending on December 25, 2005, at 24:00 Rome time.
> > >
> > > - vote :
> > >
> > > . beginning on December 26, 2005, at 00:00 Rome time;
> > > . ending on December 30, 2005, at 24:00 Rome time.
> > >
> > >
> > > Article 3
> > >
> > > The agenda of this comitial session is the following one :
> > >
> > > 1. Election of the five Tribunes of the Plebs for 2006 (2759
> > a.u.c.).
> > > The 5 citizens whose candidacy has been legally registered
are :
> > >
> > > Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa (CTP list declaration on Nov. 26,
12 :14
> > am,
> > > mess. 890, registered on Nov. 26, 11 :02 am, mess. CTP list
> 891) ;
> > >
> > > Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (CTP list declaration on Nov. 28,
> 7 :39
> > > am, mess. 892, registered on Nov. 28, 7 :49 pm, mess. CTP list
> > 894) ;
> > >
> > > Cnaeus Salix Astur (CTP list declaration on Nov. 28, 12 :38
pm,
> > mess.
> > > 893, registered on Nov. 28, 7 :55 pm, mess. CTP list 895) ;
> > >
> > > Marcus Arminius Maior (CTP list declaration on Dec. 2, 9 :10
pm,
> > > mess. 897, registered on Dec. 2, 11 :31 pm, mess. CTP list
899) ;
> > >
> > > Marcus Moravius Piscinus Horatianus (CTP list declaration on
> Dec.
> > 3,
> > > 9 :56 pm, mess. 901, registered on Dec. 4, 6 :23 pm, mess. CTP
> list
> > > 904) ;
> > >
> > > Marcus Bianchius Antonius, currently in charge (CTP list
> > declaration
> > > on Dec. 6, 9 :55 pm, mess. 910, registered on Dec. 7, 7 :54
pm,
> > mess.
> > > CTP list 911).
> > >
> > >
> > > 2. Election of the two Aediles of the Plebs for 2006 (2759
> > a.u.c.).
> > > The only citizen whose candidacy has been legally registered
is :
> > >
> > > Julilla Sempronia Magna (CTP list
> > > declaration on Dec. 5, 7 :13 pm, mess. 906, registered on Dec.
5,
> > > 11 :14 pm, mess. CTP list 907).
> > >
> > >
> > > Article 4
> > >
> > > The appropriate magistrates of Nova Roma are responsible,
> > > as far as each one is concerned by the present edict,
> > > for executing it. This edict which will be published in the
> > > Tabularium of Nova Roma.
> > >
> > > Issued in Caen, city of the Viducasses, France, this twenty
> second
> > > day of December, 2005 C.E. (22 December 2759), during the
> > consulate of
> > > Fr. Apulus Caesar and Ga. Popillius Laenas
> > >
> > > scr. Cadomago, civ. Viducassium, Gallia,
> > > a.d. XI Kal. Ian. MMDCCLVIIII a.u.c.
> > >
> > > Publius Memmius Albucius
> > > Tribunus Plebis
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40949 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: Lex Grylla de Magistratibus Plebus Creandis
Salve Equitius Cato:

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
<mlcinnyc@g...> wrote:
>
> OSD C. Equitius Cato
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> Senatrix, your desire to see this nonsense end is admirable;
however,
> it would be far simpler if one of the tribunes would just accept
the
> Magister Aranearius' work as an extension of tribunician potestas
for
> this particular instance --- and ANNOUNCE that fact.

Po: Yeah, that would be ideal, but alas, not our call. You can tell
that I am hoping for a solution to settle this? I admit it :). I
went shopping in the Tabularium, but the above was the best
legislative deal I could come up with, aside from the suggestion to
issue an edictum, using Cordus' proposed methodology to cover the
potestas of the webmaster thing.

Seriously....

If nothing else, the Lex Grylla demonstrates that one way or the
other, arrangements have to be made for some Tribs. We can't just
say 'Well, folks, no Tribs for you this year'. As I've said before,
they are an integral part of our check/balance Romanesque decision-
making process.
>
> This whole election season has been a mess: poorly planned, poorly
> executed, and in violation of Nova Roman law in several instances.
> Can we not just get this done with?

Po: This is the first time I've ever seen as many rough roads...,
I'll give you that....maybe others have, but I haven't since 2000,
unless they were very well kept behind the scenes.
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato

Bene vale,
Po
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40950 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
---Salve Hortensia Maior Tribuna et Salvete Omnes:

First off, I apologize...I was likely typing around the same time
you were as I didn't see this post before I posted my last respondeo
to Equitius Cato.

So if I sounded as though you were not working on things, one or
more of you, I apologize.

I'm glad you took my suggestions in good faith. I did not mean to
offend anyone, just acknowledge and try to ameliorate the situation.

Valete bene,
Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia P. Strabonis, Cordo, Catonis, Octavioque spd;
> I vetoed Albucius's edict & declared the election a 'fait
> accompli' (what is the Latin;-) around 2 a.m.. thanks to Senatrix
> Strabo's quick thinking.
>
> We don't need any fancy theories, English Common Law which
> is a descendant of Roman Law has the concept of a 'fictional
notice'
> [cant think of the real legal term] meaning if no one objects than
> it is deemed that you permitted tha action to occur.
>
> Since the tribs forgot to make the announcement in the CPT but the
> elections went forward without the legal notice without objection,
> we make the assumption that the plebs had their notice....That's
it.
>
> Albucius's problems stem from his analysis the leges from an EU
> point of view, not Roman law or Roman history.
>
> I propose we bestow upon Albucius the cognomen "Intercessor" for
all
> his fun uses of his veto power without a positive solution: the
> Ludi, the elections....;-)
> positively the last time,
> Marca Hortensia Maior TRP (Nov. 2005)
>
> Note to Cato: before criticizing us roundly, how about the fact
> that Saturninus at the last moment hosted the Plebian Ludi, Fuscus
&
> I helped him. This was November. Then the majority of us have end
of
> year exams, papers & Saturnalia, & Christmas and Hannukah!
> >
> > M. Hortensia Senatrice P. Strabonis spd;
> > thank you thank you Senatrix Pompeia Strabo for an
> > excellent suggestion; I am very grateful!....I veto Albucius's
> > election call, as an election of the Plebians has occurred...I
> voted
> > in the cista and can affirm that the CPT was listed and
candidates
> > within as well as the brilliant 'write in' choice...that saves
> wear
> > and tear on the webmaster, the diribatores & the Quirites so we
> > won't need that by-election that my error caused.
> > Again my apologies for forgetting to call the CPT,
> > bene vale
> > M. Hortensia Maior TRP -2005...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > agree with every sensible, wonderful suggestion below.
> > > Pompeia: Not necessarily. You could consider the suggestion
> > above.
> > > Alternately: there are five of you and a majority of you
*could
> > > *pronounce intersessio against your most recent election call,
> and
> > > further: affirm that an election of the Plebian people has
> > occurred,
> > > although the wrong verbage was employed to convene same, and
> thus
> > to
> > > nix the Plebs' wishes (and likely their interest) by convening
a
> > new
> > > election out of a bad choice of words is against the spirit of
> the
> > > constitution; further, it potentially compromises the Plebian
> (and
> > > often Patrician) entitlement to a dissenting voice in
government
> > > next year, should one be required. I do not wish to see
another
> > year
> > > of contesting Tribune potestas...over technical
> snags/ambiguities.
> > > It stunts our growth as a republic, this sort of thing, I feel.
> > >
> > > Quirites.....am I understanding this situation correctly?
When
> I
> > > logged into the cista to vote...there were three comitia
> > open...one
> > > I could not get in to the Comitia Plebius Tributa of course as
a
> > > Patrician...but three were listed....could someone tell me
that
> > > three were *not* listed at the onset of these elections?
> > > >
> > > > So please find all, in the absence of any answer from my
est.
> > > > Colleagues, an official convening edict.
> > > >
> > > > You will thus see that the (official) contio period is tiny
> and
> > > > falling in Christmas time. So please all (Christians... ;-
) )
> > > > forgive "us" this. I hope that the fact that we all know
well
> > now
> > >
> > > Pompeia: It is not the Christians, Jesus, Santa, Kahless the
> > > Unforgettable, whomever,.. you are potentially offending...it
is
> > the
> > > Plebian order within Nova Roma, with respect. Those who
elected
> > you
> > > to represent their rights and needs. Saturnalia ends I
believe
> > > tomorrow (if you go by Caligula's numbers :)), so I am not
sure
> > what
> > > Christmas has to do with all of this. I know not all vote
> > counters
> > > are Christians, as a matter of trivia, Honoured Tribune. We
> must
> > > take care not to compromise Plebian rights to representation
> come
> > > Ian. I 2759. That is my concern.
> > >
> > > the
> > > > names of our 1 + 5 candidates, and also that there are not
> more
> > > > runners than open positions, will make debates shorter and
> > easier.
> > > >
> > > > The voting period must legally last 5 days. So votes will be
> > able
> > > to
> > > > be cast till 30/12 midnight Rome time. Here too, please all
> > > > diribitores, the magister aranearius and other magistrates
and
> > > > assistants involved in the process of counting and stating
the
> > > votes
> > > > forgive this extreme schedule.
> > > >
> > > > I propose, if every constitutional power agrees this
proposal,
> > > that
> > > > the first days of January 2006 could help these last
> processings
> > > > ending, if necessary. Meanwhile, during the first days of
next
> > > 2759
> > > > auc, our 1+5 candidates will be able to take contact,
> > > unofficially,
> > > > with their future tasks.
> > > >
> > > > A by-election will have to be called by the new-elected
> Tribunes
> > > to
> > > > get a 2nd Aedilis Plebis.
> > >
> > > Pompeia: I think something else can be worked out. But if
you
> > > insist, and you do not receive intercessio from your
collegiae,
> > then
> > > you may proceed with a new election, and even if your vote
> > counters
> > > are not doing 'the Christmas thing', they may still be
busy....
> > in
> > > which case, you would have to issue an edictum stating that
> since
> > no
> > > diribitores are available to help you tally the votes, then
> > Plebian
> > > X and Plebian Y shall be appointed to count votes.....or call
> the
> > > Senate into session for assistance if you get stuck....as
> Tribune
> > > you may do that. In either case, this linguistic/technical
> hole,
> > > with respect to the current cista proceedings, has to be
> plugged.
> > > That is why edictum were invented I do believe.
> > >
> > > We have to take steps, one way or the other, to ensure that
the
> > > legality of this election is affirmed....or...a new one will
> > indeed
> > > have to be held....that is up to this year's Tribunes....they
> have
> > > the potestas....
> > >
> > > Worst case scenerio:
> > >
> > >
> > > I recommend intercessio against this 'new' election if it is
> still
> > a
> > > factor within the next day or so.. (if I understand things
> > > correctly) . And even better separately (essentially in my
> view),
> > > an edictum issued by the majority of Tribunes affirming the
> > validity
> > > of these recent elections....to safeguard the validity of the
> > > potestas of the incoming Tribunes (Tribunes may issue
edicta).
> > > Likewise in this edictum, I would affirm the validity of the
> > > election of the Plebian Aedile.
> > >
> > > Sorry to 'butt in' as a Patrician, but I believe that Tribunes
> are
> > > an integral part of the balance of decision making...an
integral
> > > component of the push/pull checks and balances of our Roman-
> based
> > > government/judicial system, and their election has to be
> > recognized
> > > as bona fide and affirmed beyond question....as with any other
> > > magisterial election. They play a large role.
> > >
> > > Valete bene.........Po
> > > >
> > > > Valete omnes,
> > > >
> > > > PMA
> > > > __________________________________________________
> > > >
> > > > TRIBUNE P. MEMMIUS ALBUCIUS EDICT
> > > > ON THE CONVENING OF THE COMITIA PLEBIS TRIBUTA
> > > > (Latin text available on demand)
> > > >
> > > > I, Publius Memmius Albucius, Tribune of the Plebs, by the
> > authority
> > > > vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of Nova Roma,
> > > >
> > > > In view of the Constitution of Nova Roma, specially its
> article
> > > > III.C., IV.7. and IV.A.5,
> > > > In view of my Edict (Dec. 9 12 :57 CPT list) on the annual
> > calling
> > > > for candidates for the plebeian offices of Tribunes of the
> Plebs
> > > and
> > > > Aediles of the Plebs (« ELECTIONS - PLEBS - 2nd period
closed -
>
> > > > OFFICIAL CANDIDACIES »),
> > > >
> > > > Edicts :
> > > >
> > > > Article 1
> > > >
> > > > The Comitia plebis tributa are convened.
> > > >
> > > > Article 2
> > > >
> > > > The schedule of this comitial session is the following one :
> > > >
> > > > - debates (contio) :
> > > >
> > > > . beginning on December 24, 2005, at 00:00 Rome time ;
> > > > . ending on December 25, 2005, at 24:00 Rome time.
> > > >
> > > > - vote :
> > > >
> > > > . beginning on December 26, 2005, at 00:00 Rome time;
> > > > . ending on December 30, 2005, at 24:00 Rome time.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Article 3
> > > >
> > > > The agenda of this comitial session is the following one :
> > > >
> > > > 1. Election of the five Tribunes of the Plebs for 2006 (2759
> > > a.u.c.).
> > > > The 5 citizens whose candidacy has been legally registered
> are :
> > > >
> > > > Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa (CTP list declaration on Nov. 26,
> 12 :14
> > > am,
> > > > mess. 890, registered on Nov. 26, 11 :02 am, mess. CTP list
> > 891) ;
> > > >
> > > > Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (CTP list declaration on Nov. 28,
> > 7 :39
> > > > am, mess. 892, registered on Nov. 28, 7 :49 pm, mess. CTP
list
> > > 894) ;
> > > >
> > > > Cnaeus Salix Astur (CTP list declaration on Nov. 28, 12 :38
> pm,
> > > mess.
> > > > 893, registered on Nov. 28, 7 :55 pm, mess. CTP list 895) ;
> > > >
> > > > Marcus Arminius Maior (CTP list declaration on Dec. 2, 9 :10
> pm,
> > > > mess. 897, registered on Dec. 2, 11 :31 pm, mess. CTP list
> 899) ;
> > > >
> > > > Marcus Moravius Piscinus Horatianus (CTP list declaration on
> > Dec.
> > > 3,
> > > > 9 :56 pm, mess. 901, registered on Dec. 4, 6 :23 pm, mess.
CTP
> > list
> > > > 904) ;
> > > >
> > > > Marcus Bianchius Antonius, currently in charge (CTP list
> > > declaration
> > > > on Dec. 6, 9 :55 pm, mess. 910, registered on Dec. 7, 7 :54
> pm,
> > > mess.
> > > > CTP list 911).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2. Election of the two Aediles of the Plebs for 2006 (2759
> > > a.u.c.).
> > > > The only citizen whose candidacy has been legally registered
> is :
> > > >
> > > > Julilla Sempronia Magna (CTP list
> > > > declaration on Dec. 5, 7 :13 pm, mess. 906, registered on
Dec.
> 5,
> > > > 11 :14 pm, mess. CTP list 907).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Article 4
> > > >
> > > > The appropriate magistrates of Nova Roma are responsible,
> > > > as far as each one is concerned by the present edict,
> > > > for executing it. This edict which will be published in the
> > > > Tabularium of Nova Roma.
> > > >
> > > > Issued in Caen, city of the Viducasses, France, this twenty
> > second
> > > > day of December, 2005 C.E. (22 December 2759), during the
> > > consulate of
> > > > Fr. Apulus Caesar and Ga. Popillius Laenas
> > > >
> > > > scr. Cadomago, civ. Viducassium, Gallia,
> > > > a.d. XI Kal. Ian. MMDCCLVIIII a.u.c.
> > > >
> > > > Publius Memmius Albucius
> > > > Tribunus Plebis
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40951 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia! - Merry Christmas!
---Merry Christmas to you too Lentule !:

I saw your website....you look so Roman, amice. But I hope Santa
will bring you some caligae to compliment your well draped toga!
They are a fortune though. Definitely 'not' a stocking stuffer.

Vale,
Po
In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
<cn_corn_lent@y...> wrote:
>
> Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Quaestor Kandidatus Quiritibus SPD:
>
> I just wanted to note that in the next 4 days I won't be able to
use internet because I have to go away for the Christmas holidays.
>
> Therefore I wish Merry Christmas to all my fellow citizen and
happy Saturnalia!
>
> VALETE QUAM LAETISSIME!
>
>
> Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
> QUAESTOR CANDIDATUS
> www.cnlentulus.iweb.hu
> -------------------------------
> Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
> Accensus Consulis Fr. Apuli Caesaris
> Scriba Aedilis Curulis L. Iulii Sullae
> Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae Scholasticae Senior
> Scriba Magistri Araneari C. Minuci Scaevolae Iunior
> Sodalis Sodalitatis Latinitatis
> Latinista, Classicus Philologus
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40952 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
M. Hortensia Senatricae P. Strabonis Quiritibus spd;
no need to apologize you helped constructively. That is
entirely appreciated.
Diana Octavia, I don't have such a sanguine view of Albucius's
work- he vetoed the Megalesia, the Plebian Ludi and then the
elections. He also never helped Saturninus with the Plebian
Ludi...with 'work' like this I wish he'd celebrate one holiday & rest!
M . Hortensia Maior

And wishing
a very Merry Christmas to all Christian Cives in Nova Roma!!!!!


> First off, I apologize...I was likely typing around the same time
> you were as I didn't see this post before I posted my last respondeo
> to Equitius Cato.
>
> So if I sounded as though you were not working on things, one or
> more of you, I apologize.
>
> I'm glad you took my suggestions in good faith. I did not mean to
> offend anyone, just acknowledge and try to ameliorate the situation.
>
> Valete bene,
> Pompeia
>
>
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40953 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - legal discussion
Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
since the burning issue is over I retitled the thread for those
interested in the discussion., I just remembered the term in English
Common Law is "constructive notice"....since the elections went
foward without objection we make the assumption that the plebs
had 'constructive notice' ...meaning a posting in the CPT that
elections were announced. there might be another legal principle as
Cordus said; we did it without objection so it's okay...
valete
M. Hortensia



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia P. Strabonis, Cordo, Catonis, Octavioque spd;
> I vetoed Albucius's edict & declared the election a 'fait
> accompli' (what is the Latin;-) around 2 a.m.. thanks to Senatrix
> Strabo's quick thinking.
>
> We don't need any fancy theories, English Common Law which
> is a descendant of Roman Law has the concept of a 'fictional
notice'
> [cant think of the real legal term] meaning if no one objects than
> it is deemed that you permitted tha action to occur.
>
> Since the tribs forgot to make the announcement in the CPT but the
> elections went forward without the legal notice without objection,
> we make the assumption that the plebs had their notice....That's
it.
>
> Albucius's problems stem from his analysis the leges from an EU
> point of view, not Roman law or Roman history.
>
> I propose we bestow upon Albucius the cognomen "Intercessor" for
all
> his fun uses of his veto power without a positive solution: the
> Ludi, the elections....;-)
> positively the last time,
> Marca Hortensia Maior TRP (Nov. 2005)
>
> Note to Cato: before criticizing us roundly, how about the fact
> that Saturninus at the last moment hosted the Plebian Ludi, Fuscus
&
> I helped him. This was November. Then the majority of us have end
of
> year exams, papers & Saturnalia, & Christmas and Hannukah!
> >
> > M. Hortensia Senatrice P. Strabonis spd;
> > thank you thank you Senatrix Pompeia Strabo for an
> > excellent suggestion; I am very grateful!....I veto Albucius's
> > election call, as an election of the Plebians has occurred...I
> voted
> > in the cista and can affirm that the CPT was listed and
candidates
> > within as well as the brilliant 'write in' choice...that saves
> wear
> > and tear on the webmaster, the diribatores & the Quirites so we
> > won't need that by-election that my error caused.
> > Again my apologies for forgetting to call the CPT,
> > bene vale
> > M. Hortensia Maior TRP -2005...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > agree with every sensible, wonderful suggestion below.
> > > Pompeia: Not necessarily. You could consider the suggestion
> > above.
> > > Alternately: there are five of you and a majority of you
*could
> > > *pronounce intersessio against your most recent election call,
> and
> > > further: affirm that an election of the Plebian people has
> > occurred,
> > > although the wrong verbage was employed to convene same, and
> thus
> > to
> > > nix the Plebs' wishes (and likely their interest) by convening
a
> > new
> > > election out of a bad choice of words is against the spirit of
> the
> > > constitution; further, it potentially compromises the Plebian
> (and
> > > often Patrician) entitlement to a dissenting voice in
government
> > > next year, should one be required. I do not wish to see
another
> > year
> > > of contesting Tribune potestas...over technical
> snags/ambiguities.
> > > It stunts our growth as a republic, this sort of thing, I feel.
> > >
> > > Quirites.....am I understanding this situation correctly?
When
> I
> > > logged into the cista to vote...there were three comitia
> > open...one
> > > I could not get in to the Comitia Plebius Tributa of course as
a
> > > Patrician...but three were listed....could someone tell me
that
> > > three were *not* listed at the onset of these elections?
> > > >
> > > > So please find all, in the absence of any answer from my
est.
> > > > Colleagues, an official convening edict.
> > > >
> > > > You will thus see that the (official) contio period is tiny
> and
> > > > falling in Christmas time. So please all (Christians... ;-
) )
> > > > forgive "us" this. I hope that the fact that we all know
well
> > now
> > >
> > > Pompeia: It is not the Christians, Jesus, Santa, Kahless the
> > > Unforgettable, whomever,.. you are potentially offending...it
is
> > the
> > > Plebian order within Nova Roma, with respect. Those who
elected
> > you
> > > to represent their rights and needs. Saturnalia ends I
believe
> > > tomorrow (if you go by Caligula's numbers :)), so I am not
sure
> > what
> > > Christmas has to do with all of this. I know not all vote
> > counters
> > > are Christians, as a matter of trivia, Honoured Tribune. We
> must
> > > take care not to compromise Plebian rights to representation
> come
> > > Ian. I 2759. That is my concern.
> > >
> > > the
> > > > names of our 1 + 5 candidates, and also that there are not
> more
> > > > runners than open positions, will make debates shorter and
> > easier.
> > > >
> > > > The voting period must legally last 5 days. So votes will be
> > able
> > > to
> > > > be cast till 30/12 midnight Rome time. Here too, please all
> > > > diribitores, the magister aranearius and other magistrates
and
> > > > assistants involved in the process of counting and stating
the
> > > votes
> > > > forgive this extreme schedule.
> > > >
> > > > I propose, if every constitutional power agrees this
proposal,
> > > that
> > > > the first days of January 2006 could help these last
> processings
> > > > ending, if necessary. Meanwhile, during the first days of
next
> > > 2759
> > > > auc, our 1+5 candidates will be able to take contact,
> > > unofficially,
> > > > with their future tasks.
> > > >
> > > > A by-election will have to be called by the new-elected
> Tribunes
> > > to
> > > > get a 2nd Aedilis Plebis.
> > >
> > > Pompeia: I think something else can be worked out. But if
you
> > > insist, and you do not receive intercessio from your
collegiae,
> > then
> > > you may proceed with a new election, and even if your vote
> > counters
> > > are not doing 'the Christmas thing', they may still be
busy....
> > in
> > > which case, you would have to issue an edictum stating that
> since
> > no
> > > diribitores are available to help you tally the votes, then
> > Plebian
> > > X and Plebian Y shall be appointed to count votes.....or call
> the
> > > Senate into session for assistance if you get stuck....as
> Tribune
> > > you may do that. In either case, this linguistic/technical
> hole,
> > > with respect to the current cista proceedings, has to be
> plugged.
> > > That is why edictum were invented I do believe.
> > >
> > > We have to take steps, one way or the other, to ensure that
the
> > > legality of this election is affirmed....or...a new one will
> > indeed
> > > have to be held....that is up to this year's Tribunes....they
> have
> > > the potestas....
> > >
> > > Worst case scenerio:
> > >
> > >
> > > I recommend intercessio against this 'new' election if it is
> still
> > a
> > > factor within the next day or so.. (if I understand things
> > > correctly) . And even better separately (essentially in my
> view),
> > > an edictum issued by the majority of Tribunes affirming the
> > validity
> > > of these recent elections....to safeguard the validity of the
> > > potestas of the incoming Tribunes (Tribunes may issue
edicta).
> > > Likewise in this edictum, I would affirm the validity of the
> > > election of the Plebian Aedile.
> > >
> > > Sorry to 'butt in' as a Patrician, but I believe that Tribunes
> are
> > > an integral part of the balance of decision making...an
integral
> > > component of the push/pull checks and balances of our Roman-
> based
> > > government/judicial system, and their election has to be
> > recognized
> > > as bona fide and affirmed beyond question....as with any other
> > > magisterial election. They play a large role.
> > >
> > > Valete bene.........Po
> > > >
> > > > Valete omnes,
> > > >
> > > > PMA
> > > > __________________________________________________
> > > >
> > > > TRIBUNE P. MEMMIUS ALBUCIUS EDICT
> > > > ON THE CONVENING OF THE COMITIA PLEBIS TRIBUTA
> > > > (Latin text available on demand)
> > > >
> > > > I, Publius Memmius Albucius, Tribune of the Plebs, by the
> > authority
> > > > vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of Nova Roma,
> > > >
> > > > In view of the Constitution of Nova Roma, specially its
> article
> > > > III.C., IV.7. and IV.A.5,
> > > > In view of my Edict (Dec. 9 12 :57 CPT list) on the annual
> > calling
> > > > for candidates for the plebeian offices of Tribunes of the
> Plebs
> > > and
> > > > Aediles of the Plebs (« ELECTIONS - PLEBS - 2nd period
closed -
>
> > > > OFFICIAL CANDIDACIES »),
> > > >
> > > > Edicts :
> > > >
> > > > Article 1
> > > >
> > > > The Comitia plebis tributa are convened.
> > > >
> > > > Article 2
> > > >
> > > > The schedule of this comitial session is the following one :
> > > >
> > > > - debates (contio) :
> > > >
> > > > . beginning on December 24, 2005, at 00:00 Rome time ;
> > > > . ending on December 25, 2005, at 24:00 Rome time.
> > > >
> > > > - vote :
> > > >
> > > > . beginning on December 26, 2005, at 00:00 Rome time;
> > > > . ending on December 30, 2005, at 24:00 Rome time.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Article 3
> > > >
> > > > The agenda of this comitial session is the following one :
> > > >
> > > > 1. Election of the five Tribunes of the Plebs for 2006 (2759
> > > a.u.c.).
> > > > The 5 citizens whose candidacy has been legally registered
> are :
> > > >
> > > > Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa (CTP list declaration on Nov. 26,
> 12 :14
> > > am,
> > > > mess. 890, registered on Nov. 26, 11 :02 am, mess. CTP list
> > 891) ;
> > > >
> > > > Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (CTP list declaration on Nov. 28,
> > 7 :39
> > > > am, mess. 892, registered on Nov. 28, 7 :49 pm, mess. CTP
list
> > > 894) ;
> > > >
> > > > Cnaeus Salix Astur (CTP list declaration on Nov. 28, 12 :38
> pm,
> > > mess.
> > > > 893, registered on Nov. 28, 7 :55 pm, mess. CTP list 895) ;
> > > >
> > > > Marcus Arminius Maior (CTP list declaration on Dec. 2, 9 :10
> pm,
> > > > mess. 897, registered on Dec. 2, 11 :31 pm, mess. CTP list
> 899) ;
> > > >
> > > > Marcus Moravius Piscinus Horatianus (CTP list declaration on
> > Dec.
> > > 3,
> > > > 9 :56 pm, mess. 901, registered on Dec. 4, 6 :23 pm, mess.
CTP
> > list
> > > > 904) ;
> > > >
> > > > Marcus Bianchius Antonius, currently in charge (CTP list
> > > declaration
> > > > on Dec. 6, 9 :55 pm, mess. 910, registered on Dec. 7, 7 :54
> pm,
> > > mess.
> > > > CTP list 911).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2. Election of the two Aediles of the Plebs for 2006 (2759
> > > a.u.c.).
> > > > The only citizen whose candidacy has been legally registered
> is :
> > > >
> > > > Julilla Sempronia Magna (CTP list
> > > > declaration on Dec. 5, 7 :13 pm, mess. 906, registered on
Dec.
> 5,
> > > > 11 :14 pm, mess. CTP list 907).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Article 4
> > > >
> > > > The appropriate magistrates of Nova Roma are responsible,
> > > > as far as each one is concerned by the present edict,
> > > > for executing it. This edict which will be published in the
> > > > Tabularium of Nova Roma.
> > > >
> > > > Issued in Caen, city of the Viducasses, France, this twenty
> > second
> > > > day of December, 2005 C.E. (22 December 2759), during the
> > > consulate of
> > > > Fr. Apulus Caesar and Ga. Popillius Laenas
> > > >
> > > > scr. Cadomago, civ. Viducassium, Gallia,
> > > > a.d. XI Kal. Ian. MMDCCLVIIII a.u.c.
> > > >
> > > > Publius Memmius Albucius
> > > > Tribunus Plebis
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40954 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: Lex Grylla de Magistratibus Plebus Creandis
A. Tullia Scholastica Pompeiae Minuciae-Tiberiae Straboni quiritibus
omnibusque S.P.D.

I must confess that I didn¹t see any notice convening the plebeian
comitia, and so informed our magister Latinitatis, since I must remind him
of the timing of elections and the candidates for the various offices.
>
>
> Salve Equitius Cato:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
> <mlcinnyc@g...> wrote:
>> >
>> > OSD C. Equitius Cato
>> >
>> > Salvete omnes.
>> >
>> > Senatrix, your desire to see this nonsense end is admirable;
> however,
>> > it would be far simpler if one of the tribunes would just accept
> the
>> > Magister Aranearius' work as an extension of tribunician potestas
> for
>> > this particular instance --- and ANNOUNCE that fact.
>
> Po: Yeah, that would be ideal, but alas, not our call. You can tell
> that I am hoping for a solution to settle this? I admit it :). I
> went shopping in the Tabularium,
>
>
> ATS: Now, Po, didn¹t we put up a big sign on the Tabularium door saying
> ³UNDER CONSTRUCTION. ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK!² The (tentative) list with the
> revised names of most of the laws was uploaded just yesterday, and I am only
> about halfway through the corrections‹and not all of the corrected laws have
> been uploaded (though most have been), and some require other therapy in
> addition to uploading, the latter of which has been done. The absence of
> correction should have been evident from the mishmash of spelling and dreadful
> Latin in the titles of the leges Morauiae cited today.
>
> but the above was the best
> legislative deal I could come up with, aside from the suggestion to
> issue an edictum, using Cordus' proposed methodology to cover the
> potestas of the webmaster thing.
>
> ATS: There may be some others of interest, but that at the one on
> magistratuum aetate (corrected, and presumed uploaded) may be the most
> relevant. There are several laws dealing specifically with the comitia plebis
> tributa.
>
> Seriously....
>
> If nothing else, the Lex Grylla demonstrates that one way or the
> other, arrangements have to be made for some Tribs. We can't just
> say 'Well, folks, no Tribs for you this year'. As I've said before,
> they are an integral part of our check/balance Romanesque decision-
> making process.
>
> ATS: The Lex Grylla has been corrected, and probably uploaded in correct
> form‹I¹ll have to check.
>
> Absolutely we cannot go without our tribunes and other plebeian
> magistrates. It¹s bad enough that one of the aediles plebis vanished just
> before he had to supervise the ludi assigned to him, and that one of them from
> the previous year never showed up to take the oath of office.
>> >
>> > This whole election season has been a mess: poorly planned, poorly
>> > executed, and in violation of Nova Roman law in several instances.
>> > Can we not just get this done with?
>
> Po: This is the first time I've ever seen as many rough roads...,
> I'll give you that....maybe others have, but I haven't since 2000,
> unless they were very well kept behind the scenes.
>
> ATS: Well, this year circumstances beyond the control of the convening
> consul surely affected this. That, however, doesn¹t explain why the plebeian
> elections weren¹t convened. They don¹t affect me directly as I can¹t vote in
> them, but they should have been convened when the others were, or as soon as
> possible thereafter. Amid all of the discussion on dies nefasti and such, one
> might have expected that someone (apart from Cordus and yours truly, neither
> of whom is a magistrate with any power in such matters) should have noticed
> this.
>> >
>> > Valete,
>> >
>> > Cato
>
> Bene vale,
> Po
>> >
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40955 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: Lex Grylla de Magistratibus Plebus Creandis
---Salve A. Tullia Scholastica et Salvete Omnes:


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
<fororom@l...> wrote:
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica Pompeiae Minuciae-Tiberiae Straboni
quiritibus
> omnibusque S.P.D.
>
> I must confess that I didn¹t see any notice convening the
plebeian
> comitia, and so informed our magister Latinitatis, since I must
remind him
> of the timing of elections and the candidates for the various
offices.

Pompeia respondeo: Thank you for your info. I think it has pretty
much been established that there wasn't one.

Regarding the Tabularium comment I issued to Cato, to which you in
turn respond below, I was referring in my discourse to Cato
Quaestor to the validity and application of any legal language which
might help us out. It was far, far from being a complaint about the
Latin nomenclature and the arrangement of the Leges. I am not sure
how you arrived at this conclusion....I was talking about the 'best
legal deal I could find'. I was shopping for laws, not nitpicking
the decor :) As if I would be in a position to do that to begin
with. My Latin is terrible, I admit it!

Vale Amica
Pompeia
> >
> >
> > Salve Equitius Cato:
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
> > <mlcinnyc@g...> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > OSD C. Equitius Cato
> >> >
> >> > Salvete omnes.
> >> >
> >> > Senatrix, your desire to see this nonsense end is admirable;
> > however,
> >> > it would be far simpler if one of the tribunes would just
accept
> > the
> >> > Magister Aranearius' work as an extension of tribunician
potestas
> > for
> >> > this particular instance --- and ANNOUNCE that fact.
> >
> > Po: Yeah, that would be ideal, but alas, not our call. You can
tell
> > that I am hoping for a solution to settle this? I admit it :).
I
> > went shopping in the Tabularium,
> >
> >
> > ATS: Now, Po, didn¹t we put up a big sign on the Tabularium
door saying
> > ³UNDER CONSTRUCTION. ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK!² The (tentative)
list with the
> > revised names of most of the laws was uploaded just yesterday,
and I am only
> > about halfway through the corrections‹and not all of the
corrected laws have
> > been uploaded (though most have been), and some require other
therapy in
> > addition to uploading, the latter of which has been done. The
absence of
> > correction should have been evident from the mishmash of
spelling and dreadful
> > Latin in the titles of the leges Morauiae cited today.
> >
> > but the above was the best
> > legislative deal I could come up with, aside from the suggestion
to
> > issue an edictum, using Cordus' proposed methodology to cover the
> > potestas of the webmaster thing.
> >
> > ATS: There may be some others of interest, but that at the
one on
> > magistratuum aetate (corrected, and presumed uploaded) may be
the most
> > relevant. There are several laws dealing specifically with the
comitia plebis
> > tributa.
> >
> > Seriously....
> >
> > If nothing else, the Lex Grylla demonstrates that one way or the
> > other, arrangements have to be made for some Tribs. We can't just
> > say 'Well, folks, no Tribs for you this year'. As I've said
before,
> > they are an integral part of our check/balance Romanesque
decision-
> > making process.
> >
> > ATS: The Lex Grylla has been corrected, and probably
uploaded in correct
> > form‹I¹ll have to check.
> >
> > Absolutely we cannot go without our tribunes and other
plebeian
> > magistrates. It¹s bad enough that one of the aediles plebis
vanished just
> > before he had to supervise the ludi assigned to him, and that
one of them from
> > the previous year never showed up to take the oath of office.
> >> >
> >> > This whole election season has been a mess: poorly planned,
poorly
> >> > executed, and in violation of Nova Roman law in several
instances.
> >> > Can we not just get this done with?
> >
> > Po: This is the first time I've ever seen as many rough
roads...,
> > I'll give you that....maybe others have, but I haven't since
2000,
> > unless they were very well kept behind the scenes.
> >
> > ATS: Well, this year circumstances beyond the control of
the convening
> > consul surely affected this. That, however, doesn¹t explain why
the plebeian
> > elections weren¹t convened. They don¹t affect me directly as I
can¹t vote in
> > them, but they should have been convened when the others were,
or as soon as
> > possible thereafter. Amid all of the discussion on dies nefasti
and such, one
> > might have expected that someone (apart from Cordus and yours
truly, neither
> > of whom is a magistrate with any power in such matters) should
have noticed
> > this.
> >> >
> >> > Valete,
> >> >
> >> > Cato
> >
> > Bene vale,
> > Po
> >> >
> >
> > Vale, et ualete,
> >
> > A. Tullia Scholastica
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40956 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: New file uploaded to Nova-Roma
Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the Nova-Roma
group.

File : /domus_listing 9.xls
Uploaded by : caesofabius <christer.edling@...>
Description : Domus project, version to correct

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/files/domus_listing%209.xls

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

Regards,

caesofabius <christer.edling@...>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40957 From: Bryce Rumbles Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
Oh my Zeus, what have I gotten myself into THIS time?

Gaius Pontius Celsus, bibliothecarius

Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:
M. Hortensia P. Strabonis, Cordo, Catonis, Octavioque spd;
I vetoed Albucius's edict & declared the election a 'fait
accompli' (what is the Latin;-) around 2 a.m.. thanks to Senatrix
Strabo's quick thinking.

We don't need any fancy theories, English Common Law which
is a descendant of Roman Law has the concept of a 'fictional notice'
[cant think of the real legal term] meaning if no one objects than
it is deemed that you permitted tha action to occur.

Since the tribs forgot to make the announcement in the CPT but the
elections went forward without the legal notice without objection,
we make the assumption that the plebs had their notice....That's it.

Albucius's problems stem from his analysis the leges from an EU
point of view, not Roman law or Roman history.

I propose we bestow upon Albucius the cognomen "Intercessor" for all
his fun uses of his veto power without a positive solution: the
Ludi, the elections....;-)
positively the last time,
Marca Hortensia Maior TRP (Nov. 2005)

Note to Cato: before criticizing us roundly, how about the fact
that Saturninus at the last moment hosted the Plebian Ludi, Fuscus &
I helped him. This was November. Then the majority of us have end of
year exams, papers & Saturnalia, & Christmas and Hannukah!
>
> M. Hortensia Senatrice P. Strabonis spd;
> thank you thank you Senatrix Pompeia Strabo for an
> excellent suggestion; I am very grateful!....I veto Albucius's
> election call, as an election of the Plebians has occurred...I
voted
> in the cista and can affirm that the CPT was listed and candidates
> within as well as the brilliant 'write in' choice...that saves
wear
> and tear on the webmaster, the diribatores & the Quirites so we
> won't need that by-election that my error caused.
> Again my apologies for forgetting to call the CPT,
> bene vale
> M. Hortensia Maior TRP -2005...
>
>
>
>
>
> agree with every sensible, wonderful suggestion below.
> > Pompeia: Not necessarily. You could consider the suggestion
> above.
> > Alternately: there are five of you and a majority of you *could
> > *pronounce intersessio against your most recent election call,
and
> > further: affirm that an election of the Plebian people has
> occurred,
> > although the wrong verbage was employed to convene same, and
thus
> to
> > nix the Plebs' wishes (and likely their interest) by convening a
> new
> > election out of a bad choice of words is against the spirit of
the
> > constitution; further, it potentially compromises the Plebian
(and
> > often Patrician) entitlement to a dissenting voice in government
> > next year, should one be required. I do not wish to see another
> year
> > of contesting Tribune potestas...over technical
snags/ambiguities.
> > It stunts our growth as a republic, this sort of thing, I feel.
> >
> > Quirites.....am I understanding this situation correctly? When
I
> > logged into the cista to vote...there were three comitia
> open...one
> > I could not get in to the Comitia Plebius Tributa of course as a
> > Patrician...but three were listed....could someone tell me that
> > three were *not* listed at the onset of these elections?
> > >
> > > So please find all, in the absence of any answer from my est.
> > > Colleagues, an official convening edict.
> > >
> > > You will thus see that the (official) contio period is tiny
and
> > > falling in Christmas time. So please all (Christians... ;-) )
> > > forgive "us" this. I hope that the fact that we all know well
> now
> >
> > Pompeia: It is not the Christians, Jesus, Santa, Kahless the
> > Unforgettable, whomever,.. you are potentially offending...it is
> the
> > Plebian order within Nova Roma, with respect. Those who elected
> you
> > to represent their rights and needs. Saturnalia ends I believe
> > tomorrow (if you go by Caligula's numbers :)), so I am not sure
> what
> > Christmas has to do with all of this. I know not all vote
> counters
> > are Christians, as a matter of trivia, Honoured Tribune. We
must
> > take care not to compromise Plebian rights to representation
come
> > Ian. I 2759. That is my concern.
> >
> > the
> > > names of our 1 + 5 candidates, and also that there are not
more
> > > runners than open positions, will make debates shorter and
> easier.
> > >
> > > The voting period must legally last 5 days. So votes will be
> able
> > to
> > > be cast till 30/12 midnight Rome time. Here too, please all
> > > diribitores, the magister aranearius and other magistrates and
> > > assistants involved in the process of counting and stating the
> > votes
> > > forgive this extreme schedule.
> > >
> > > I propose, if every constitutional power agrees this proposal,
> > that
> > > the first days of January 2006 could help these last
processings
> > > ending, if necessary. Meanwhile, during the first days of next
> > 2759
> > > auc, our 1+5 candidates will be able to take contact,
> > unofficially,
> > > with their future tasks.
> > >
> > > A by-election will have to be called by the new-elected
Tribunes
> > to
> > > get a 2nd Aedilis Plebis.
> >
> > Pompeia: I think something else can be worked out. But if you
> > insist, and you do not receive intercessio from your collegiae,
> then
> > you may proceed with a new election, and even if your vote
> counters
> > are not doing 'the Christmas thing', they may still be busy....
> in
> > which case, you would have to issue an edictum stating that
since
> no
> > diribitores are available to help you tally the votes, then
> Plebian
> > X and Plebian Y shall be appointed to count votes.....or call
the
> > Senate into session for assistance if you get stuck....as
Tribune
> > you may do that. In either case, this linguistic/technical
hole,
> > with respect to the current cista proceedings, has to be
plugged.
> > That is why edictum were invented I do believe.
> >
> > We have to take steps, one way or the other, to ensure that the
> > legality of this election is affirmed....or...a new one will
> indeed
> > have to be held....that is up to this year's Tribunes....they
have
> > the potestas....
> >
> > Worst case scenerio:
> >
> >
> > I recommend intercessio against this 'new' election if it is
still
> a
> > factor within the next day or so.. (if I understand things
> > correctly) . And even better separately (essentially in my
view),
> > an edictum issued by the majority of Tribunes affirming the
> validity
> > of these recent elections....to safeguard the validity of the
> > potestas of the incoming Tribunes (Tribunes may issue edicta).
> > Likewise in this edictum, I would affirm the validity of the
> > election of the Plebian Aedile.
> >
> > Sorry to 'butt in' as a Patrician, but I believe that Tribunes
are
> > an integral part of the balance of decision making...an integral
> > component of the push/pull checks and balances of our Roman-
based
> > government/judicial system, and their election has to be
> recognized
> > as bona fide and affirmed beyond question....as with any other
> > magisterial election. They play a large role.
> >
> > Valete bene.........Po
> > >
> > > Valete omnes,
> > >
> > > PMA
> > > __________________________________________________
> > >
> > > TRIBUNE P. MEMMIUS ALBUCIUS EDICT
> > > ON THE CONVENING OF THE COMITIA PLEBIS TRIBUTA
> > > (Latin text available on demand)
> > >
> > > I, Publius Memmius Albucius, Tribune of the Plebs, by the
> authority
> > > vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of Nova Roma,
> > >
> > > In view of the Constitution of Nova Roma, specially its
article
> > > III.C., IV.7. and IV.A.5,
> > > In view of my Edict (Dec. 9 12 :57 CPT list) on the annual
> calling
> > > for candidates for the plebeian offices of Tribunes of the
Plebs
> > and
> > > Aediles of the Plebs (« ELECTIONS - PLEBS - 2nd period closed -

> > > OFFICIAL CANDIDACIES »),
> > >
> > > Edicts :
> > >
> > > Article 1
> > >
> > > The Comitia plebis tributa are convened.
> > >
> > > Article 2
> > >
> > > The schedule of this comitial session is the following one :
> > >
> > > - debates (contio) :
> > >
> > > . beginning on December 24, 2005, at 00:00 Rome time ;
> > > . ending on December 25, 2005, at 24:00 Rome time.
> > >
> > > - vote :
> > >
> > > . beginning on December 26, 2005, at 00:00 Rome time;
> > > . ending on December 30, 2005, at 24:00 Rome time.
> > >
> > >
> > > Article 3
> > >
> > > The agenda of this comitial session is the following one :
> > >
> > > 1. Election of the five Tribunes of the Plebs for 2006 (2759
> > a.u.c.).
> > > The 5 citizens whose candidacy has been legally registered
are :
> > >
> > > Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa (CTP list declaration on Nov. 26,
12 :14
> > am,
> > > mess. 890, registered on Nov. 26, 11 :02 am, mess. CTP list
> 891) ;
> > >
> > > Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (CTP list declaration on Nov. 28,
> 7 :39
> > > am, mess. 892, registered on Nov. 28, 7 :49 pm, mess. CTP list
> > 894) ;
> > >
> > > Cnaeus Salix Astur (CTP list declaration on Nov. 28, 12 :38
pm,
> > mess.
> > > 893, registered on Nov. 28, 7 :55 pm, mess. CTP list 895) ;
> > >
> > > Marcus Arminius Maior (CTP list declaration on Dec. 2, 9 :10
pm,
> > > mess. 897, registered on Dec. 2, 11 :31 pm, mess. CTP list
899) ;
> > >
> > > Marcus Moravius Piscinus Horatianus (CTP list declaration on
> Dec.
> > 3,
> > > 9 :56 pm, mess. 901, registered on Dec. 4, 6 :23 pm, mess. CTP
> list
> > > 904) ;
> > >
> > > Marcus Bianchius Antonius, currently in charge (CTP list
> > declaration
> > > on Dec. 6, 9 :55 pm, mess. 910, registered on Dec. 7, 7 :54
pm,
> > mess.
> > > CTP list 911).
> > >
> > >
> > > 2. Election of the two Aediles of the Plebs for 2006 (2759
> > a.u.c.).
> > > The only citizen whose candidacy has been legally registered
is :
> > >
> > > Julilla Sempronia Magna (CTP list
> > > declaration on Dec. 5, 7 :13 pm, mess. 906, registered on Dec.
5,
> > > 11 :14 pm, mess. CTP list 907).
> > >
> > >
> > > Article 4
> > >
> > > The appropriate magistrates of Nova Roma are responsible,
> > > as far as each one is concerned by the present edict,
> > > for executing it. This edict which will be published in the
> > > Tabularium of Nova Roma.
> > >
> > > Issued in Caen, city of the Viducasses, France, this twenty
> second
> > > day of December, 2005 C.E. (22 December 2759), during the
> > consulate of
> > > Fr. Apulus Caesar and Ga. Popillius Laenas
> > >
> > > scr. Cadomago, civ. Viducassium, Gallia,
> > > a.d. XI Kal. Ian. MMDCCLVIIII a.u.c.
> > >
> > > Publius Memmius Albucius
> > > Tribunus Plebis
> > > >
> > >
> >
>






---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------






Bryce Rumbles
26º 7' 35"N
80º 15' 49"W
"I don't believe that libraries should be drab places where people sit in silence, and that's been the main reason for our policy of employing wild animals as librarians."







---------------------------------
Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40958 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: Lex Grylla de Magistratibus Plebus Creandis
> Salue, Po, et saluete, quirites!
>
> ---Salve A. Tullia Scholastica et Salvete Omnes:
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
> <fororom@l...> wrote:
>> >
>> > A. Tullia Scholastica Pompeiae Minuciae-Tiberiae Straboni
> quiritibus
>> > omnibusque S.P.D.
>> >
>> > I must confess that I didn¹t see any notice convening the
> plebeian
>> > comitia, and so informed our magister Latinitatis, since I must
> remind him
>> > of the timing of elections and the candidates for the various
> offices.
>
> Pompeia respondeo: Thank you for your info. I think it has pretty
> much been established that there wasn't one.
>
> ATS: Yes, and I simply thought that I had missed it, as apparently was
> the case with Cordus.
>
> Regarding the Tabularium comment I issued to Cato, to which you in
> turn respond below, I was referring in my discourse to Cato
> Quaestor to the validity and application of any legal language which
> might help us out. It was far, far from being a complaint about the
> Latin nomenclature and the arrangement of the Leges.
>
> ATS: I didn¹t take it that way at all‹I was only kidding that this is not
> the best time to go shopping in the Tabularium as the construction project is
> in full swing‹it¹s strictly a hard-hat area now. About 30 of the existing
> laws have been uploaded, and I am around the halfway point in correction.
>
> I am not sure
> how you arrived at this conclusion....I was talking about the 'best
> legal deal I could find'. I was shopping for laws, not nitpicking
> the decor :)
>
> ATS: I know, Po; you simply misunderstood me.
>
> As if I would be in a position to do that to begin
> with. My Latin is terrible, I admit it!
>
> ATS: Both the magister Latinitatis and I conduct these Latin classes at
> the Academia...and most of my students are doing work in the A range, though
> their instructor isn¹t known for short or easy tests, and the text spreads the
> grammar on like peanut butter and jam.
>
> Vale Amica
> Pompeia
>
> Vale, amica, et valete, omnes.
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Salve Equitius Cato:
>>> > >
>>> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
>>> > > <mlcinnyc@g...> wrote:
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > OSD C. Equitius Cato
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > Salvete omnes.
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > Senatrix, your desire to see this nonsense end is admirable;
>>> > > however,
>>>>> > >> > it would be far simpler if one of the tribunes would just
> accept
>>> > > the
>>>>> > >> > Magister Aranearius' work as an extension of tribunician
> potestas
>>> > > for
>>>>> > >> > this particular instance --- and ANNOUNCE that fact.
>>> > >
>>> > > Po: Yeah, that would be ideal, but alas, not our call. You can
> tell
>>> > > that I am hoping for a solution to settle this? I admit it :).
> I
>>> > > went shopping in the Tabularium,
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: Now, Po, didn¹t we put up a big sign on the Tabularium
> door saying
>>> > > ³UNDER CONSTRUCTION. ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK!² The (tentative)
> list with the
>>> > > revised names of most of the laws was uploaded just yesterday,
> and I am only
>>> > > about halfway through the corrections‹and not all of the
> corrected laws have
>>> > > been uploaded (though most have been), and some require other
> therapy in
>>> > > addition to uploading, the latter of which has been done. The
> absence of
>>> > > correction should have been evident from the mishmash of
> spelling and dreadful
>>> > > Latin in the titles of the leges Morauiae cited today.
>>> > >
>>> > > but the above was the best
>>> > > legislative deal I could come up with, aside from the suggestion
> to
>>> > > issue an edictum, using Cordus' proposed methodology to cover the
>>> > > potestas of the webmaster thing.
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: There may be some others of interest, but that at the
> one on
>>> > > magistratuum aetate (corrected, and presumed uploaded) may be
> the most
>>> > > relevant. There are several laws dealing specifically with the
> comitia plebis
>>> > > tributa.
>>> > >
>>> > > Seriously....
>>> > >
>>> > > If nothing else, the Lex Grylla demonstrates that one way or the
>>> > > other, arrangements have to be made for some Tribs. We can't just
>>> > > say 'Well, folks, no Tribs for you this year'. As I've said
> before,
>>> > > they are an integral part of our check/balance Romanesque
> decision-
>>> > > making process.
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: The Lex Grylla has been corrected, and probably
> uploaded in correct
>>> > > form‹I¹ll have to check.
>>> > >
>>> > > Absolutely we cannot go without our tribunes and other
> plebeian
>>> > > magistrates. It¹s bad enough that one of the aediles plebis
> vanished just
>>> > > before he had to supervise the ludi assigned to him, and that
> one of them from
>>> > > the previous year never showed up to take the oath of office.
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > This whole election season has been a mess: poorly planned,
> poorly
>>>>> > >> > executed, and in violation of Nova Roman law in several
> instances.
>>>>> > >> > Can we not just get this done with?
>>> > >
>>> > > Po: This is the first time I've ever seen as many rough
> roads...,
>>> > > I'll give you that....maybe others have, but I haven't since
> 2000,
>>> > > unless they were very well kept behind the scenes.
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: Well, this year circumstances beyond the control of
> the convening
>>> > > consul surely affected this. That, however, doesn¹t explain why
> the plebeian
>>> > > elections weren¹t convened. They don¹t affect me directly as I
> can¹t vote in
>>> > > them, but they should have been convened when the others were,
> or as soon as
>>> > > possible thereafter. Amid all of the discussion on dies nefasti
> and such, one
>>> > > might have expected that someone (apart from Cordus and yours
> truly, neither
>>> > > of whom is a magistrate with any power in such matters) should
> have noticed
>>> > > this.
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > Valete,
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > Cato
>>> > >
>>> > > Bene vale,
>>> > > Po
>>>>> > >> >
>>> > >
>>> > > Vale, et ualete,
>>> > >
>>> > > A. Tullia Scholastica
>>> > >
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40959 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Edictum Censoris CFBQ XLI about the the correction of the family fa
Ex Officio Censoris Caesonis Fabii Buteo Quintiliani

Edictum Censoris CFBQ XLI about the the correction of the family
facts in the "Domus project".

Because of the new Family and Gens legislation, the Album Gentium is
no longer up to date. To correct this I started the "Domus project",
back in April 2758, my Cohors Censoris CFBQ has since then collected
the needed facts, partly by contacting a lot of citizens, but also by
checking all available facts. The result is that the facts that are
needed to re-create the Album Gentium or any equivalent according to
the new standards are now gathered in one xls file.

I. What we got so far is now collected in the "Files" section of the
Nova Roma main list under the name "domus_listing 9.xls" and with the
description "Domus project, version to correct".

II. What the Censores need is a correct listing of the members of
each familia (that are citizens), including spouses and children. Any
existing domii also need to be correctly listed. Faulty cognomina,
missing familae and other possible faults also need to be corrected.

III. It is natural considering the scope of the project that what my
Cohors has collected may not be complete. Some persons may have
become "lost" in the great "ocean" of citizens. Another possible
weaknesses could be missing spouses and children that are citizens.
Even other faults may be found. This is why I need every citizen to
look the listings over.

IV. As Censor I now ask all citizens to send in all needed
corrections of the project, concerning their own familia and domus,
to the Censores by the "Censores" address that is found on the first
page of the Nova Roma main site. Any needed instructions or answers
to questions about the "domus project" will be provided by the
Censores after the 31st of December 2758.

V. The URL to the Nova Roma main list "Files" section where the file
is found is http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/files/ and when
one hits the link it will down load the file "domus_listing 9.xls" to
ones computer.

VI. A button that will take anyone to the "Files" section directly
will also soon be available on the first page of the Nova Roma main
site.

VII. I will leave the rest of the work with the "Domus project" to my
dear colleague Gnaeus Equitius Marinus and his new colleague next
year, as I withdraw from my office at the end of my term.

VIII. This Edictum becomes effective immediately.

Given the 24th of December, in the year of the Consulship of
Franciscus Apulus Caesar and Gaius Popillius Laenas, 2758 AUC.

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFBQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40960 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
Salve Gai Ponti!

You'ze got yourself into a real heap of trouble boy! Why? Because you
is here! -:)

Io Saturnalia et Merry Christmas

QSP



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Bryce Rumbles <brycerumbles@y...>
wrote:
>
> Oh my Zeus, what have I gotten myself into THIS time?
>
> Gaius Pontius Celsus, bibliothecarius
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40961 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
C. Equitius Cato M. Hortensiae Maori quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Tribune, you wrote:

"Note to Cato: before criticizing us roundly, how about the fact
that Saturninus at the last moment hosted the Plebian Ludi, Fuscus &
I helped him. This was November. Then the majority of us have end of
year exams, papers & Saturnalia, & Christmas and Hannukah!"

Hooray! And how about the fact that none of that has the slightest
thing to do with the point that the election process this year has
been, legally and practically, a total mess?

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40962 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: Kwanza vs, religious holidays
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Sensei Phil Perez"
<senseiphil@n...> wrote:
>
> Salve Africola ;-),
>
> Here is something you should know about Kwanza's founder, I'm
surprised you didn't mention it:
>

Salve Amice,

I was talking about the holiday, not the founder. People change, as we
all know. Some lives bear bitter fruit early and only later bring
forth a more palatable crop.

I've known some very nice African American Christians who did
Christmas and Kwanzaa. Plus I think some of the Kwanzaa cards on Yahoo
Greetings are pretty.


Io Saturnalia!

MLA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40963 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-23
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
M. Hortensia G.Catonis spd;
utter poppycock. One message not posted in the CPT & 'disaster'? I
think not, we had to get a new webmaster for voting & if not for
Albucius it would be a tempest in a teapot.
If one more tiresome Patrician wants to criticize the tribs,
missing plebian aediles bloody well become a Plebian!

Thank the gods for of Consular Astur and Senatrix Julilla Sempronia
Magna who ran. If you want better Plebian magistrates let more cives
give up their patrician status.
M. Hortensia Maior


>
> Hooray! And how about the fact that none of that has the slightest
> thing to do with the point that the election process this year has
> been, legally and practically, a total mess?
>
> Vale et valete,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40964 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: Re: Kwanza vs, religious holidays
At least the cards are pretty... LOL.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<senseiphil@...> wrote:
> Salve Africola ;-),
>
> Here is something you should know about Kwanza's
founder, I'm surprised you didn't mention it:
>
> Dr. Maulana Karenga
> It seems the founder of Kwanzaa wasn't any more
ethical than those who sung its praises. In fact, at
the same time Al Sharpton was glorifying the new
holiday, its creator was sitting in a California
prison for torturing two black women who were members
of the United Slaves, a black nationalist cult he had
founded.
> The cult leader Ron N. Everett went by the name
Karenga and in the 60's took upon himself the title
"maulana," which means "master teacher" in Swahili. He
was born on a poultry farm in Maryland, the fourteenth
child of a Baptist minister. He moved to California in
the late 50's to attend LA Community College. He later
moved to UCLA, where he got a Master's degree in
political science and African Studies and by the mid
1960's, he had established himself as a leader of the
black movement- a self described "cultural
nationalist". He had purposely used the term
"nationalist" to distinguish his group from the Black
Panthers who were Marxists. He wanted a separate black
state while the Marxists worked for integration.
>
> It seems the founder of Kwanzaa wasn't any more
ethical than those who sung its praises. In fact, at
the same time Al Sharpton was glorifying the new
holiday, its creator was sitting in a California
prison for torturing two black women who were members
of the United Slaves, a black nationalist cult he had
founded.
>
> The cult leader Ron N. Everett went by the name
Karenga and in the 60's took upon himself the title
"maulana," which means "master teacher" in Swahili. He
was born on a poultry farm in Maryland, the fourteenth
child of a Baptist minister. He moved to California in
the late 50's to attend LA Community College. He later
moved to UCLA, where he got a Master's degree in
political science and African Studies and by the mid
1960's, he had established himself as a leader of the
black movement- a self described "cultural
nationalist". He had purposely used the term
"nationalist" to distinguish his group from the Black
Panthers who were Marxists. He wanted a separate black
state while the Marxists worked for integration.
>
> The friction between his group and the Panthers
mirrored the centuries of tribal warring in Africa.
Both groups were heavily recruiting at UCLA in the
60's and vying for control of the newly developed
African Studies Department. Karenga and his group
backed one candidate for dept. head and the Panthers
another. Both began carrying guns on campus and on
Jan. 17. 1969, about 150 students gathered at the
lunchroom to discuss the problem. Two Panther members
had been admitted to the college as part of a federal
program that helped black high-school dropouts enter
the university. The meeting turned violent and ended
with two of Karenga's group, George P. Stiner and
Larry Joseph Stiner killing two. The Stiner brothers
shot two Panthers John Huggins, 23 and Alprentice
"Bunchy" Carter, 26 - dead.
>
> UCLA chancellor Charles E. Young, scared that the
violence would hurt admissions said "The students here
have handled themselves in an absolutely impeccable
manner. They have been concerned. They haven't argued
who the director should be; they have been saying what
kind of person he should be." The remarks were made
after the shooting and the university went ahead with
its Afro-American Studies Program. Meanwhile,
Karenga's group grew and performed assaults and
robberies always following the law laid down in The
Quotable Karenga, a book that laid out the "True Path
of Blackness." "The sevenfold path of blackness is
think black, talk black, act black, create black, buy
black, vote black, and live black,"
>
> On May 9, 1970 he initiated the torture session that
led to his imprisonment. The torture session was
described in the L.A. Times on May 14, 1971. "The
victims said they were living at Karenga's home when
Karenga accused them of trying to kill him by pl
=== Message Truncated ===


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40965 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
C. Equitius Cato M. Hortensiae Maori sal.

Fiddlesticks. I would remind you, O Pleb, that is the duty of the
Patricians to be tiresome. It is among our most endearing qualities.
Harrrrumph.

Vale bene,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia G.Catonis spd;
> utter poppycock. One message not posted in the CPT & 'disaster'? I
> think not, we had to get a new webmaster for voting & if not for
> Albucius it would be a tempest in a teapot.
> If one more tiresome Patrician wants to criticize the tribs,
> missing plebian aediles bloody well become a Plebian!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40966 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: In Expectio
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes.

"In mense autem sexto missus est angelus Gabrihel a Deo in civitatem
Galilaeae cui nomen Nazareth ad virginem desponsatam viro cui nomen
erat Ioseph de domo David et nomen virginis Maria. Et ingressus
angelus ad eam dixit ave gratia plena Dominus tecum benedicta tu in
mulieribus. Quae cum vidisset turbata est in sermone eius et
cogitabat qualis esset ista salutatio. Et ait angelus ei ne timeas
Maria invenisti enim gratiam apud Deum. Ecce concipies in utero et
paries filium et vocabis nomen eius Iesum."

"Factum est autem in diebus illis exiit edictum a Caesare Augusto ut
describeretur universus orbis; haec descriptio prima facta est
praeside Syriae Cyrino, et ibant omnes ut profiterentur singuli in
suam civitatem."

"Christi autem generatio sic erat cum esset desponsata mater eius
Maria Ioseph antequam convenirent inventa est in utero habens de
Spiritu Sancto. Ioseph autem vir eius cum esset iustus et nollet eam
traducere voluit occulte dimittere eam. Haec autem eo cogitante ecce
angelus Domini in somnis apparuit ei dicens Ioseph fili David noli
timere accipere Mariam coniugem tuam quod enim in ea natum est de
Spiritu Sancto est. Pariet autem filium et vocabis nomen eius Iesum
ipse enim salvum faciet populum suum a peccatis eorum."


Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40967 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: Re: In Expectio
That was beautiful. I love Latin. Thank you, Cato.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
> OSD C. Equitius Cato
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> "In mense autem sexto missus est angelus Gabrihel a
Deo in civitatem
> Galilaeae cui nomen Nazareth ad virginem desponsatam
viro cui nomen
> erat Ioseph de domo David et nomen virginis Maria.
Et ingressus
> angelus ad eam dixit ave gratia plena Dominus tecum
benedicta tu in
> mulieribus. Quae cum vidisset turbata est in sermone
eius et
> cogitabat qualis esset ista salutatio. Et ait
angelus ei ne timeas
> Maria invenisti enim gratiam apud Deum. Ecce
concipies in utero et
> paries filium et vocabis nomen eius Iesum."
>
> "Factum est autem in diebus illis exiit edictum a
Caesare Augusto ut
> describeretur universus orbis; haec descriptio prima
facta est
> praeside Syriae Cyrino, et ibant omnes ut
profiterentur singuli in
> suam civitatem."
>
> "Christi autem generatio sic erat cum esset
desponsata mater eius
> Maria Ioseph antequam convenirent inventa est in
utero habens de
> Spiritu Sancto. Ioseph autem vir eius cum esset
iustus et nollet eam
> traducere voluit occulte dimittere eam. Haec autem
eo cogitante ecce
> angelus Domini in somnis apparuit ei dicens Ioseph
fili David noli
> timere accipere Mariam coniugem tuam quod enim in ea
natum est de
> Spiritu Sancto est. Pariet autem filium et vocabis
nomen eius Iesum
> ipse enim salvum faciet populum suum a peccatis
eorum."
>
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
>
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40968 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: Salve from a missing Tribune and his point of view.
Greetings

Typical, one is always around, included Easter and the 15th of August,
then he is forced away for two weeks around Christmas time for
pressing, unavoidable and unprocrastinable personal reasons and hell
breaks loose.

Someone should give a nobel prize to the creator of Murphys law.

Now, taking my part of responsability as a Tribune for the mess, I
have to say that, on principle, I lean to the side of Albucius on
this. The three cistas were not opened at the same time and plebeian
who voted at t he beginning of the other two comitia might have not
had the chance of voting on the CPT simply because they could had even
not looked back at all for the CPT cista to be open, waiting for the
message that called them to do it (why a simple "the cista is now
open for teh CPT" message was not sent is beyond me, but anyway),
effectively losing their right to vote.

On the other side, with 5 tribune candidates for 5 position and one
aedilis candidate for two, I fail to see the practical difference.

Now, and this is an opinion of mine, romans were practical people,
altho extremely formal, so if they could had found an escamotage to
save time and respect the name if not the spirit of formalities
**whenever the pratical final result would had been exactly the
same**, they would had done it, and in this sense, I find that the
theoretical solution brought forward by Cordus (the Magister
Aerenearius borrowing, so to say, the tribunician potestas) might do
the trick.

So, again, I think Albucius is absolutely, sarosanctly right on a
principle line (and in that sense, he doesn't deserve the flak he got
in the least, as he didn't deserve much of what he got all around the
year for that), but that we could make do as we are... unless someone
can tell me a practical difference that holding another election would
do, because if ther eis one, then we should have new elections
alright.

Valete,

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis Iterum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40969 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
In a message dated 12/23/2005 4:52:24 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
mlcinnyc@... writes:

"Note to Cato: before criticizing us roundly, how about the fact
that Saturninus at the last moment hosted the Plebian Ludi, Fuscus &
I helped him. This was November. Then the majority of us have end of
year exams, papers & Saturnalia, & Christmas and Hannukah!"



This is probably a really, really stupid question, but if you guys can't
give the time to the project, why do you stand?
As for the election being a mess, it wasn't as bad as the '98 elections.
That time all the assemblies were all illegal, not just the Plebjans.
Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40970 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: Re: Edictum Censoris CFBQ XLI about the the correction of the famil
On 12/24/05, Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus <christer.edling@...>
wrote:


> V. The URL to the Nova Roma main list "Files" section where the file
> is found is http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/files/ and when
> one hits the link it will down load the file "domus_listing 9.xls" to
> ones computer.


Yes, but unfortunately since I don't have excel my computer refuses to open
it :-(

Flavia Lucilla Merula


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40971 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: a.d IX Kal. Ian.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem IX Kalendas Ianuarius; haec dies comitialis est.


"This city, mistress of the whole earth and sea, which the Romans now
inhabit, is said to have had as its earliest occupants the barbarian
Sicels, a native race. As to the condition of the place before their
time, whether it was occupied by others or uninhabited, one can
certainly say. But some time later the Aborigines gained possession of
it, having taken it from the occupants after a long war. These people
had previously lived on the mountains in unwalled villages and
scattered groups; but when the Pelasgians, with whom some other Greeks
had united, assisted them in the war against their neighbours, they
drove the Sicels out of this place, walled in many towns, and
contrived to subjugate all the country that lies between the two
rivers, the Liris and the Tiber. These rivers spring from the foot of
the Apennine mountains, the range by which all Italy is divided into
two parts throughout its length, and at points about eight hundred
stades from one another discharge themselves into the Tyrrhenian Sea,
the Tiber to the north, near the city of Ostia, and the Liris to the
south, as it flows by Minturnae, both these cities being Roman
colonies. And these people remained in this same place of abode, both
never afterwards driven out by any others; but, although they
continued to be one and the same people, their name was twice changed.
Till the time of the Trojan war they preserved their ancient name of
Aborigines; but under lalus, their king, who reigned at the time of
that war, they began to be called Latins, and when Romulus founded the
city named after himself sixteen generations after the taking of Troy,
they took the name which they now bear. And in the course of time they
contrived to raise themselves from the smallest nation to the greatest
and from the most obscure to the most illustrious, not only by their
humane reception of those who sought a home among them, but also by
sharing the rights of citizenship with all who had been conquered by
them in war after a brave resistance, by permitting all the slaves,
too, who were manumitted among them to become citizens, and by
disdaining no condition of men from whom the commonwealth might reap
an advantage, but above everything else by their form of government,
which they fashioned out of their many experiences, always extracting
something useful from every occasion.

There are some who affirm that the Aborigines, from whom the Romans
are originally descended, were natives of Italy, a stock which came
into being spontaneously (I call Italy all that peninsula which is
bounded by the Ionian Gulf and the Tyrrhenian Sea and, thirdly, by the
Alps on the landward side); and these authors say that they were first
called Aborigines because they were the founders of the families of
their descendants, or, as we should call them, genearchai or
protogonoi. Others claim that certain vagabonds without house or
home, coming together out of many places, met one another there by
chance and took up their abode in the fastnesses, living by robbery
and grazing their herds. And these writers change their name, also, to
one more suitable to their condition, calling them Aberrigenes, to
show that they were wanderers; indeed, according to these, the race of
the Aborigines would seem to be no different from those the ancients
called Leleges; for this is the name they generally gave to the
homeless and mixed peoples who had no fixed abode which they could
call their country. Still others have a story to the effect that they
were colonists sent out by those Ligurians who are neighbours of the
Umbrians. For the Ligurians inhabit not only many parts of Italy but
some parts of Gaul as well, but which of these lands is their native
country is not known, since nothing certain is said of them further."
- Dionysis of Halicarnassus, "Roman Antiquities", 1.9-10


Today is celebrated by most Christians as the Eve of the Nativity of
Jesus Christ, probably (if a little confusingly) around 4 B.C.

"Et ibant omnes, ut profiterentur, singuli in suam civitatem. Ascendit
autem et Ioseph a Galilaea de civitate Nazareth in Iudaeam in
civitatem David, quae vocatur Bethlehem, eo quod esset de domo et
familia David, ut profiteretur cum Maria desponsata sibi, uxore
praegnante. Factum est autem, cum essent ibi, impleti sunt dies, ut
pareret, et peperit filium suum primogenitum; et pannis eum involvit
et reclinavit eum in praesepio, quia non erat eis locus in deversorio."


Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40972 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: Re: Edictum Censoris CFBQ XLI about the the correction of the famil
Salve Flavia Lucilla Merula!

I am no expert, but I phoned Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus who
knows better and he suggested Open Office at
http://www.openoffice.org/ . It is available for many operating
systems like MS Windows and Linux. I doesn't work as well for the
Maintosh OS (that I use) though. In that package You will find an
Excel compatible software and it is all for free. If that doesn't
function I have cc or Magister Aranearius, but as he is very busy,
You might have to wait to get any suggestions from him.

>On 12/24/05, Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus <christer.edling@...>
>wrote:
>
>
>> V. The URL to the Nova Roma main list "Files" section where the file
>> is found is http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/files/ and when
>> one hits the link it will down load the file "domus_listing 9.xls" to
> > ones computer.
>
>Yes, but unfortunately since I don't have excel my computer refuses to open
>it :-(
>
>Flavia Lucilla Merula

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFBQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40973 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-24
Subject: Re: Lex Grylla de Magistratibus Plebus Creandis
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
<fororom@l...> wrote:
>
> > Salue, Po, et saluete, quirites!
> >
> > ---Salve A. Tullia Scholastica et Salvete Omnes:
> >
> >
> > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
> > <fororom@l...> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > A. Tullia Scholastica Pompeiae Minuciae-Tiberiae Straboni
> > quiritibus
> >> > omnibusque S.P.D.
> >> >
> >> > I must confess that I didn¹t see any notice convening the
> > plebeian
> >> > comitia, and so informed our magister Latinitatis, since I
must
> > remind him
> >> > of the timing of elections and the candidates for the various
> > offices.
> >
> > Pompeia respondeo: Thank you for your info. I think it has
pretty
> > much been established that there wasn't one.
> >
> > ATS: Yes, and I simply thought that I had missed it, as
apparently was
> > the case with Cordus.
> >
> > Regarding the Tabularium comment I issued to Cato, to which you
in
> > turn respond below, I was referring in my discourse to Cato
> > Quaestor to the validity and application of any legal language
which
> > might help us out. It was far, far from being a complaint about
the
> > Latin nomenclature and the arrangement of the Leges.
> >
> > ATS: I didn¹t take it that way at all‹I was only kidding
that this is not
> > the best time to go shopping in the Tabularium as the
construction project is
> > in full swing‹it¹s strictly a hard-hat area now. About 30 of
the existing
> > laws have been uploaded, and I am around the halfway point in
correction.

Po: Oh, good. Then I apologize for misunderstanding you. I think
its wonderful that proper nomenclature is being assigned to leges,
etc. Long overdue in some spots and I am happy that you have taken
on a major role in this job.
> >
> > I am not sure
> > how you arrived at this conclusion....I was talking about
the 'best
> > legal deal I could find'. I was shopping for laws, not
nitpicking
> > the decor :)
> >
> > ATS: I know, Po; you simply misunderstood me.

Po: Ibid :).
> >
> > As if I would be in a position to do that to begin
> > with. My Latin is terrible, I admit it!
> >
> > ATS: Both the magister Latinitatis and I conduct these
Latin classes at
> > the Academia...and most of my students are doing work in the A
range, though
> > their instructor isn¹t known for short or easy tests, and the
text spreads the
> > grammar on like peanut butter and jam.

Po: LOL! Good point. Well, I could certainly use the instruction,
and the peanut butter and jam :)....thanks. I'm going to do my best
to make the time to attend.
> >

Vale bene
Pompeia

> > Vale Amica
> > Pompeia
> >
> > Vale, amica, et valete, omnes.
> >
> > A. Tullia Scholastica
> >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Salve Equitius Cato:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato"
> >>> > > <mlcinnyc@g...> wrote:
> >>>>> > >> >
> >>>>> > >> > OSD C. Equitius Cato
> >>>>> > >> >
> >>>>> > >> > Salvete omnes.
> >>>>> > >> >
> >>>>> > >> > Senatrix, your desire to see this nonsense end is
admirable;
> >>> > > however,
> >>>>> > >> > it would be far simpler if one of the tribunes would
just
> > accept
> >>> > > the
> >>>>> > >> > Magister Aranearius' work as an extension of
tribunician
> > potestas
> >>> > > for
> >>>>> > >> > this particular instance --- and ANNOUNCE that fact.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Po: Yeah, that would be ideal, but alas, not our call.
You can
> > tell
> >>> > > that I am hoping for a solution to settle this? I admit
it :).
> > I
> >>> > > went shopping in the Tabularium,
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > ATS: Now, Po, didn¹t we put up a big sign on the
Tabularium
> > door saying
> >>> > > ³UNDER CONSTRUCTION. ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK!² The
(tentative)
> > list with the
> >>> > > revised names of most of the laws was uploaded just
yesterday,
> > and I am only
> >>> > > about halfway through the corrections‹and not all of the
> > corrected laws have
> >>> > > been uploaded (though most have been), and some require
other
> > therapy in
> >>> > > addition to uploading, the latter of which has been done.
The
> > absence of
> >>> > > correction should have been evident from the mishmash of
> > spelling and dreadful
> >>> > > Latin in the titles of the leges Morauiae cited today.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > but the above was the best
> >>> > > legislative deal I could come up with, aside from the
suggestion
> > to
> >>> > > issue an edictum, using Cordus' proposed methodology to
cover the
> >>> > > potestas of the webmaster thing.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > ATS: There may be some others of interest, but that
at the
> > one on
> >>> > > magistratuum aetate (corrected, and presumed uploaded) may
be
> > the most
> >>> > > relevant. There are several laws dealing specifically
with the
> > comitia plebis
> >>> > > tributa.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Seriously....
> >>> > >
> >>> > > If nothing else, the Lex Grylla demonstrates that one way
or the
> >>> > > other, arrangements have to be made for some Tribs. We
can't just
> >>> > > say 'Well, folks, no Tribs for you this year'. As I've said
> > before,
> >>> > > they are an integral part of our check/balance Romanesque
> > decision-
> >>> > > making process.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > ATS: The Lex Grylla has been corrected, and probably
> > uploaded in correct
> >>> > > form‹I¹ll have to check.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Absolutely we cannot go without our tribunes and other
> > plebeian
> >>> > > magistrates. It¹s bad enough that one of the aediles
plebis
> > vanished just
> >>> > > before he had to supervise the ludi assigned to him, and
that
> > one of them from
> >>> > > the previous year never showed up to take the oath of
office.
> >>>>> > >> >
> >>>>> > >> > This whole election season has been a mess: poorly
planned,
> > poorly
> >>>>> > >> > executed, and in violation of Nova Roman law in
several
> > instances.
> >>>>> > >> > Can we not just get this done with?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Po: This is the first time I've ever seen as many rough
> > roads...,
> >>> > > I'll give you that....maybe others have, but I haven't
since
> > 2000,
> >>> > > unless they were very well kept behind the scenes.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > ATS: Well, this year circumstances beyond the control
of
> > the convening
> >>> > > consul surely affected this. That, however, doesn¹t
explain why
> > the plebeian
> >>> > > elections weren¹t convened. They don¹t affect me directly
as I
> > can¹t vote in
> >>> > > them, but they should have been convened when the others
were,
> > or as soon as
> >>> > > possible thereafter. Amid all of the discussion on dies
nefasti
> > and such, one
> >>> > > might have expected that someone (apart from Cordus and
yours
> > truly, neither
> >>> > > of whom is a magistrate with any power in such matters)
should
> > have noticed
> >>> > > this.
> >>>>> > >> >
> >>>>> > >> > Valete,
> >>>>> > >> >
> >>>>> > >> > Cato
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Bene vale,
> >>> > > Po
> >>>>> > >> >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Vale, et ualete,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > A. Tullia Scholastica
> >>> > >
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40974 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-25
Subject: a.d. VIII Kal. Ian.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem VIII Kalendas Ianuarius; haec dies comitialis est.


"But the most learned of the Roman historians, among whom is Porcius
Cato, who compiled with the greatest care the "origins" of the Italian
cities, Gaius Sempronius and a great many others, say that they were
Greeks, part of those who once dwelt in Achaia, and that they migrated
many generations before the Trojan war. But they do not go on to
indicate either the Greek tribe to which they belonged or the city
from which they removed, or the date or the leader of the colony, or
as the result of what turns of fortune they left their mother country;
and although they are following a Greek legend, they have cited no
Greek historian as their authority. It is uncertain, therefore, what
the truth of the matter is. But if what they say is true, the
Aborigines can be a colony of no other people but of those who are now
called Arcadians; for these were the first of all the Greeks to cross
the Ionian Gulf, under the leadership of Oenotrus, the son of Lycaon,
and to settle in Italy. This Oenotrus was the fifth from Aezeius and
Phoroneus, who were the first kings in the Peloponnesus. For Niobe was
the daughter of Phoroneus, and Pelasgus was the son of Niobe and Zeus,
it is said; Lycaon was to Aezeius and Deianira was the daughter of
Lycaon; Deianira and Pelasgus were the parents of another Lycaon,
whose son Oenotrus was born seventeen generations before the Trojan
expedition. This, then, was the time when the Greeks sent the colony
into Italy. Oenotrus left Greece because he was dissatisfied with his
portion of his father's land; for, as Lycaon had twenty-two sons, it
was necessary to divide Arcadia into as many shares. For this reason
Oenotrus left the Peloponnesus, prepared a fleet, and crossed the
Ionian Gulf with Peucetius, one of his brothers. The were accompanied
by many of their own people — for this nation is said to have been
very populous in early times — and by as many other Greeks as had less
land than was sufficient for them. Peucetius landed his people above
the Iapygian Promontory, which was the first part of Italy they made,
and settled there; and from him the inhabitants of this region were
called Peucetians. But Oenotrus with the greater part of the
expedition came into the other sea that washes the western regions
along the coast of Italy; it was then called the Ausonian Sea, are the
Ausonians who dwelt beside it, but after the Tyrrhenians became
masters at sea its name was changed to that which it now bears.

And finding there much land suitable for pasturage and much for
tillage, but for the most part unoccupied, and even that which was
inhabited not thickly populated, he cleared some of it of the
barbarians and built small towns contiguous to one another on the
mountains, which was the customary manner of habitation in use among
the ancients. And all the land he occupied, which was very extensive,
was called Oenotria, and all the people under his command Oenotrians,
which was the third name they had borne. For in the reign of Aezeius
they were called Aezeians, when Lycaon succeeded to the rule,
Lycaonians, and after Oenotrus led them into Italy they were for a
while called Oenotrians. What I say is supported by the testimony of
Sophocles, the tragic poet, in his drama entitled Triptolemus; for he
there represents Demeter as informing Triptolemus how large a tract of
land he would have to travel over while sowing it with the seeds she
had given him. For, after first referring to the eastern part of
Italy, which reaches from the Iapygian Promontory to the Sicilian
Strait, and then touching upon Sicily on the opposite side, she
returns again to the western part of Italy and enumerates the most
important nations that inhabit this coast, beginning with the
settlement of the Oenotrians. But it is enough to quote merely the
iambics in which he says:

'And after this, — first, then, upon the right,
Oenotria wide-outstretched and Tyrrhene Gulf,
And next the Ligurian land shall welcome thee.'

And Antiochus of Syracuse, a very early historian, in his account of
the settlement of Italy, when enumerating the most ancient inhabitants
in the order in which each of them held possession of any part of it,
says that first who are reported to have inhabited that country are
the Oenotrians. his words are these: "Antiochus, the son of
Xenophanes, wrote this account of Italy, which comprises all that is
most credible and certain out of the ancient tales; this country,
which is now called Italy, was formerly possessed by the Oenotrians."
Then he relates in what manner they were governed and says that in the
course of time Italus came to be their king, after whom they were
named Italians; that this man was succeeded by Morges, after whom they
were called Morgetes, and that Sicelus, being received as a guest by
Morges and setting up a kingdom for himself, divided the nation. After
which he adds these words: 'Thus those who had been Oenotrians became
Sicels, Morgetes and Italians.'" - Dionysis of Halicarnassus, "Roman
Antiquities" 1.11-12



Today is celebrated by most Christians as the feast of Nativity of
Jesus Christ.

"In principio erat Verbum et Verbum erat apud Deum et Deus erat
Verbum. Hoc erat in principio apud Deum, omnia per ipsum facta sunt
et sine ipso factum est nihil quod factum est. In ipso vita erat et
vita erat lux hominum, et lux in tenebris lucet et tenebrae eam non
comprehenderunt...et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis et
vidimus gloriam eius gloriam quasi unigeniti a Patre plenum gratiae et
veritatis." - Evangelium Dominum nostrum Iesum Christum secundum
Iohannem 1.1-5, 14

"Actum est autem cum essent ibi impleti sunt dies ut pareret et
peperit filium suum primogenitum et pannis eum involvit et reclinavit
eum in praesepio quia non erat eis locus in diversorio. Et pastores
erant in regione eadem vigilantes et custodientes vigilias noctis
supra gregem suum. Et ecce angelus Domini stetit iuxta illos et
claritas Dei circumfulsit illos et timuerunt timore magno. Et dixit
illis angelus nolite timere ecce enim evangelizo vobis gaudium magnum
quod erit omni populo: quia natus est vobis hodie salvator qui est
Christus Dominus in civitate David. Et hoc vobis signum invenietis
infantem pannis involutum et positum in praesepio." - Evangelium
Dominum nostrum Iesum Christum secundum Luccam 2.6-12


Valete bene et feste diem natalem Christi!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysis of Halicarnassus, The Vulgate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40975 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-12-25
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
Salve Tribune Maiora,

> If one more tiresome Patrician wants to criticize
> the tribs, missing plebian <sic> aediles bloody well
become a
> Plebian! <sic>

Dear me. There are plenty of very capable Plebeians.

If Moravius Piscinus, Gnaeus Salvius, Marcus Arminius
& Quintus Suetonius Paulinus win as Tribunes for 2006,
the Plebeians will be in excellent hands next year.

Vale,
Diana Octavia





__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40976 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2005-12-25
Subject: Re: Edictum Censoris CFBQ XLI about the the correction of the famil
Salve, Flavia Lucilla Merula, Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Censor, et omnes.

On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 01:28:55PM +0100, Caeso Fabius Quintilianus wrote:
> Salve Flavia Lucilla Merula!
>
> I am no expert, but I phoned Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus who
> knows better and he suggested Open Office at
> http://www.openoffice.org/ . It is available for many operating
> systems like MS Windows and Linux. I doesn't work as well for the
> Maintosh OS (that I use) though. In that package You will find an
> Excel compatible software and it is all for free. If that doesn't
> function I have cc or Magister Aranearius, but as he is very busy,
> You might have to wait to get any suggestions from him.
>
> >On 12/24/05, Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus <christer.edling@...>
> >wrote:
> >
> >
> >> V. The URL to the Nova Roma main list "Files" section where the file
> >> is found is http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/files/ and when
> >> one hits the link it will down load the file "domus_listing 9.xls" to
> > > ones computer.
> >
> >Yes, but unfortunately since I don't have excel my computer refuses to open
> >it :-(

Since I had a little time this morning, I've hacked up a program to
display this data for those who don't have Excel or Open Office (which
last is indeed available for the Mac - certainly for the OS/X version.)
Please take a look at http://novaroma.org/bin/domus - each nomen is a
link to that familia's listing. Do note that some records (e.g.,
Cornelia) are very long and consequently run off the right side of the
page; use your scroll bar as appropriate. :)

Caeso Fabi - whenever you want to update this, simply save the new Excel
sheet as a CSV file and ask the webmaster to upload it to the "htdocs"
directory as "domus_listing.csv". The script will process it as long as
that layout remains consistent.

Hopefully, this will make the data easily accessible to everyone.
Anyone finding errors or problems, feel free to report them to me, and
I'll fix them as time allows.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
Magister Aranearius
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40977 From: robertpartlow Date: 2005-12-25
Subject: felix Saturnalia, Christmas, Chanukah, etc.
Salvete,

I hope you all don't mind my liberal use of Latin(it's been 300 years
since I used it with other people). I hope all people in Nova Roma
enjoy the holidays. I also wish for them to remember that, during the
Republic as well as the Emperium, many traditions and faiths were
celebrated openly during the good times(of which there were many).

Valvate,
Appius Claudius Scipio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40978 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-25
Subject: Re: Edictum Censoris CFBQ XLI about the the correction of the famil
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Minucio Scaeuolae quiritibusque omnibus S.P.D.
>
> Salve, Flavia Lucilla Merula, Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Censor, et omnes.
>
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 01:28:55PM +0100, Caeso Fabius Quintilianus wrote:
>> > Salve Flavia Lucilla Merula!
>> >
>> > I am no expert, but I phoned Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus who
>> > knows better and he suggested Open Office at
>> > http://www.openoffice.org/ . It is available for many operating
>> > systems like MS Windows and Linux. I doesn't work as well for the
>> > Maintosh OS (that I use) though. In that package You will find an
>> > Excel compatible software and it is all for free. If that doesn't
>> > function I have cc or Magister Aranearius, but as he is very busy,
>> > You might have to wait to get any suggestions from him.
>> >
>>> > >On 12/24/05, Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus <christer.edling@...>
>>> > >wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>>> > >> V. The URL to the Nova Roma main list "Files" section where the file
>>>> > >> is found is http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/files/ and when
>>>> > >> one hits the link it will down load the file "domus_listing 9.xls" to
>>>> > > > ones computer.
>>> > >
>>> > >Yes, but unfortunately since I don't have excel my computer refuses to
>>> open
>>> > >it :-(
>
> Since I had a little time this morning, I've hacked up a program to
> display this data for those who don't have Excel or Open Office (which
> last is indeed available for the Mac - certainly for the OS/X version.)
> Please take a look at http://novaroma.org/bin/domus - each nomen is a
> link to that familia's listing. Do note that some records (e.g.,
> Cornelia) are very long and consequently run off the right side of the
> page; use your scroll bar as appropriate. :)
>
> Caeso Fabi - whenever you want to update this, simply save the new Excel
> sheet as a CSV file and ask the webmaster to upload it to the "htdocs"
> directory as "domus_listing.csv". The script will process it as long as
> that layout remains consistent.
>
> Hopefully, this will make the data easily accessible to everyone.
> Anyone finding errors or problems, feel free to report them to me, and
> I'll fix them as time allows.
>
> ATS: This worked for me‹I have Excel, but for some reason it doesn¹t want
> to talk to Yahoo, and couldn¹t open the file (or anything else). Plurimas
> gratias!
>
> Happy holidays to all!
>
>
> Valete,
> Caius Minucius Scaevola
> Magister Aranearius
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40979 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-25
Subject: Re: felix Saturnalia, Christmas, Chanukah, etc.
---Salve Claudius Scipio et Salvete Omnes:

I thank you for your warm greeting and wise words. I in turn wish
you and all citizens and/or forum list subscribers a blessed holiday
and all the best in the New Year to come.

Valete bene
Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "robertpartlow" <robertpartlow@y...>
wrote:
>
> Salvete,
>
> I hope you all don't mind my liberal use of Latin(it's been 300
years
> since I used it with other people). I hope all people in Nova Roma
> enjoy the holidays. I also wish for them to remember that, during
the
> Republic as well as the Emperium, many traditions and faiths were
> celebrated openly during the good times(of which there were many).
>
> Valvate,
> Appius Claudius Scipio
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40980 From: robertpartlow Date: 2005-12-25
Subject: Re: felix Saturnalia, Christmas, Chanukah, etc.
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "robertpartlow" <robertpartlow@y...>
wrote:
>
> Salvete,
>
> I hope you all don't mind my liberal use of Latin(it's been 300 years
> since I used it with other people). I hope all people in Nova Roma
> enjoy the holidays. I also wish for them to remember that, during the
> Republic as well as the Emperium, many traditions and faiths were
> celebrated openly during the good times(of which there were many).
>
> Valvate,
> Appius Claudius Scipio
>
Robertpartlow/A.Claudius Scipio corrects: 300 should be 30(chuckle).
Been into the egg"grog" a little.
Valve
Saturnalia optima Tibi exopto!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40981 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-25
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
Hortensia G. Catonis spd;
Tch, Tch, such language on the ML;-) how true I can see this
Cato is living up to his family tradition & actually chiding this
Hortensia...my, my we're repeating history!
optime vale amice, & Felix Natalis !!
Hortensia
>
> Fiddlesticks. I would remind you, O Pleb, that is the duty of the
> Patricians to be tiresome. It is among our most endearing
qualities.
> Harrrrumph.
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Cato
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
> >
> > M. Hortensia G.Catonis spd;
> > utter poppycock. One message not posted in the CPT
& 'disaster'? I
> > think not, we had to get a new webmaster for voting & if not
for
> > Albucius it would be a tempest in a teapot.
> > If one more tiresome Patrician wants to criticize the tribs,
> > missing plebian aediles bloody well become a Plebian!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40982 From: Bryce Rumbles Date: 2005-12-25
Subject: Greetings from a newbie
Salve, QSP!

Io Saturnalia et Merry Christmas to you too, Quintus Suetonius! I hope your holidays have been good to you as well.

Gaius Pontius Celsus


"Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:
Salve Gai Ponti!

You'ze got yourself into a real heap of trouble boy! Why? Because you
is here! -:)

Io Saturnalia et Merry Christmas

QSP



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Bryce Rumbles <brycerumbles@y...>
wrote:
>
> Oh my Zeus, what have I gotten myself into THIS time?
>
> Gaius Pontius Celsus, bibliothecarius
>
>





---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------






Bryce Rumbles
26º 7' 35"N
80º 15' 49"W
"I don't believe that libraries should be drab places where people sit in silence, and that's been the main reason for our policy of employing wild animals as librarians."







---------------------------------
Yahoo! Shopping
Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40983 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-26
Subject: a.d. VII Kal. Ian.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem VII Kalendas Ianuarius; haec dies fastus est.

"There is another legend related by the inhabitants, to the effect
that before the reign of Jupiter Saturn was lord in this land and that
the celebrated manner of life in his reign, abounding in the produce
of every season, was enjoyed by none more than them. And, indeed, if
anyone, setting aside the fabulous part of this account, will examine
the merit of any country from which mankind received the greatest
enjoyments immediately after their birth, whether they sprang from the
earth, according to the ancient tradition, or came into being in some
other manner, he will find none more beneficent to them than this.
For, to compare one country with another of the same extent, Italy is,
in my opinion, the best country, not only of Europe, but even of all
the rest of the world. And yet I am not unaware that I shall not be
believed by many when they reflect on Egypt, Libya, Babylonia and any
other fertile countries there may be. But I, for my part, do not limit
the wealth derived from the soil to one sort of produce, nor do I feel
any eagerness to live where there are only rich arable lands and
little or nothing else that is useful; but I account that country the
best which is the most self-sufficient and generally stands least in
need of imported commodities. And I am persuaded that Italy enjoys
this universal fertility and diversity of advantages beyond any other
land.

For Italy does not, while possessing a great deal of good arable land,
lack trees, as does a grain-bearing country; nor, on the other hand,
while suitable for growing all manner of trees, does it, when sown to
grain, produce scanty crops, as does a timbered country; nor yet,
while yielding both grain and trees in abundance, is it unsuitable for
the grazing of cattle; nor can anyone say that, while it bears rich
produce of crops and timber and herds, it is nevertheless disagreeable
for men to live in. Nay, on the contrary, it abounds in practically
everything that affords either pleasure or profit. To what
grain-bearing country, indeed, watered, not with rivers, but with
rains from heaven, do the plains of Campania yield, in which I have
seen fields that produce even three crops in a year, summer's harvest
following upon that of when and autumn's upon that of summer? To what
olive orchards are those of the Messapians, the Daunians, the Sabines
and many others inferior? To what vineyards those of Tyrrhenia and the
Alban and the Falernian districts, where the soil is wonderfully kind
to vines and with the least labour produces the finest grapes in the
greatest abundance? And besides the land that is cultivated one will
find much that is left untilled as pasturage for sheep and goats, and
still more extensive and more wonderful is the land suitable for
grazing horses and cattle; for not only the marsh and meadow grass,
which is very plentiful, but the dewy and well-watered grass of the
glades, infinite in its abundance, furnish grazing for them in summer
as well as in winter and keep them always in good condition. section
4But most wonderful of all are the forests growing upon the rocky
heights, in the glens and on the uncultivated hills, from which the
inhabitants are abundantly supplied with fine timber suitable for the
building of ships as well as for all other purposes. nor are any of
these materials hard to come at or at a distance from human need, but
they are easy to handle and readily available, owing to the multitude
of rivers that flow through the whole peninsula and make the
transportation and exchange of everything the land produces
inexpensive. Springs also of hot water have been discovered in many
places, affording most pleasant baths and sovereign cures for chronic
ailments. There are also mines of all sorts, plenty of wild beasts for
hunting, and a great variety of sea fish, besides innumerable other
things, some useful and others of a nature to excite wonder. But the
finest thing of all is the climate, admirably tempered by the seasons,
so that less than elsewhere is harm done by excessive cold or
inordinate heat either to the growing fruits and grains or to the
bodies of animals." - Dionysis of Halicarnassus, "Roman Antiquities"
1.36-37


In ancient Egypt, today was celebrated as the birthday of the god
Horus. Horus is the falcon-headed god, the son of the goddess Isis
and the god Osiris. Seth caused the death of his brother Osiris, the
first king of Egypt, and seized his throne. Isis retrieved the
fourteen pieces of her husband's body, reconstructed it, and hovered
over it in the form of a sparrowhawk, fanning enough life back into
him for her to conceive a son, Horus. She knew Seth would harm her
child, so she fled the Nile delta and gave birth to Horus at Chemmis
near Buto. With the assistance of other deities, such as the goddesses
Hathor and Selqet, Isis raised Horus until he was old enough to
challenge Seth and claim his royal inheritance.

Amun-Re, the sun god, invited Horus and Seth to put their cases before
the Ennead, a tribunal of the gods. Seth declared that he should be
king because only he was strong enough to defend the sun during its
nightly voyage through the underworld. Some deities accepted this
argument, but Isis persuaded them to change their minds. Seth refused
to proceed with Isis there, so he adjourned the tribunal to an island
to which Isis was refused access. However, the goddess bribed Nemty,
ferryman of the gods, to take her across. Then she tricked Seth into
agreeing that it was wrong for a son to have his inheritance stolen.
Seth complained about her trickery and the gods punished Nemty by
cutting off his toes. Further confrontations between Horus and Seth
proved inconclusive, and in some writings their battle continues for
all eternity; the more common ending is that the gods wrote to Osiris,
who threatened to send demons to the realm of the gods if Horus was
not made king of Egypt at once. Not surprisingly, the gods chose
Horus' side.

Horus has many names, and the Pharoah was considered to be the living
embodiment of the god. Horus' right eye is the Sun and his left eye
is the Moon, and depictions of his eye, the Wedjat, are among the most
common and recognizable symbols of all ancient Egypt. In the course
of his battle with Seth, his left eye, the Moon, was injured; Thoth,
the god of writing, magic, and wisdom, re-assembled the Moon, and its
destruction and re-building is mirrored in the phases of the Moon.
The name Horus comes from the Egyptian word Hor, which translates as
"face". We find him worshipped as Mekhenti-irry which translates as
"He who has on his brow Two Eyes", the sun and moon representing his
eyes. On nights when there is no moon we find him worshipped as
Mekhenti-en-irty, "He who on his brow has no eyes", in this form he
was considered the god of the blind.

As Horus Behudety, Horus represents the midday sun, and is symbolized
by the winged sun disc. As Harmakhet, Horus represents the rising
Sun, and is represented by the human- or ram-headed lion, the Sphinx.


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysis of Halicarnassus, Horus
(http://towerwebproductions.com/alt-lib/myth/eyeofhorus.shtml) and
(http://www.littleegypt.com/horus.html) and
(http://www.kingtutshop.com/freeinfo/horus.htm)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40984 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-26
Subject: Re: felix Saturnalia, Christmas, Chanukah, etc.
Salve Claude Amice:

Well, I read your text originally, and I thought...'awesome... this
guy is either very, very old'... *or* he made a typo' :). So, I
elected to error on the side of caution, possibly out of a need to
respect my elders, and say nothing, except of course to wish you a
good holiday:)


Egg 'grog' eh?? May we pick that up at a 7-11 or Mac's Milk
store? :) I generally opt for Becker's. Great stuff.

Cheers!
Po


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "robertpartlow" <robertpartlow@y...>
wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "robertpartlow"
<robertpartlow@y...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete,
> >
> > I hope you all don't mind my liberal use of Latin(it's been 300
years
> > since I used it with other people). I hope all people in Nova
Roma
> > enjoy the holidays. I also wish for them to remember that,
during the
> > Republic as well as the Emperium, many traditions and faiths
were
> > celebrated openly during the good times(of which there were
many).
> >
> > Valvate,
> > Appius Claudius Scipio
> >
> Robertpartlow/A.Claudius Scipio corrects: 300 should be 30
(chuckle).
> Been into the egg"grog" a little.
> Valve
> Saturnalia optima Tibi exopto!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40985 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-26
Subject: Absent
Salvete omnes,

I have to hit the road today and head up to Northern British Columbia
for my winter drilling projects. I'll have high speed internet on my
locations as usual but it takes me 2 days to get there.

All the best for the season and I'll catch you in a few days!


Regards,

QSP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40986 From: FAC Date: 2005-12-26
Subject: Wishes
Salvete Omnes,
I wish you happy holydays to you all, Merry Christmas and an Happy new
year.
I hope you'll have happy and relaxing celebrating days with your
family and friends.

Valete
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40987 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2005-12-26
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
Cato is right. It is the duty of Patricians to be hidebound, conservative,
and generally irksome. It is the duty of the Plebs to try to ignore them and
when necessary get the Tribunes to pronounce an intercessio against one of
their magistrates. On the whole, the Tribunes and the Plebeian Aediles should
remember that we Plebs can usually get along pretty well and that they only
really need pay attention to the shenanigans of the Patricians. This is why the
records of the Senate are kept in the Temple of Ceres to prevent any annoying
attempts by the Patricians to make changes in the records.

F. Galerius Aurelianus
flamen Cerealis

P.S. I don't mean you, Modianus, as you were born a Pleb and are a Patrician
by adoption.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40988 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-26
Subject: de Suffragiis
A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus omnibus S.P.D.

I have a prickly little question: several of the laws I have been
correcting require the votes to be tallied within 48 hours of the conclusion
of the voting period, and reported by the presiding magistrate within a set
period thereafter; the most recent I have corrected has listed 24 hours as
that period. We are now past both 48 hours after the polls closed and 24
hours beyond that--and both occurred by Saturday afternoon, my time.

While it doesn't make much difference to me as I am going to be working
in the censor's office whether or not I am elected to perform duties similar
to those I have been performing for some time, some of the other candidates
might like to know whether or not they have been elected--and the citizenry
might like to know who their magistrates will be, for the terms expire in
less than a week.

Have the diribitores captured and counted the votes? If so, have they
reported them to the presiding magistrate? Yes, this is a busy time when
many people are away, but it's no secret that the main election often
conflicts with this period; two years ago, the election results were
reported late on December 24th or early on December 25th. M. Octavius
Germanicus had indicated that he was working with the diribitores to count
the votes; we, the citizenry, hope that all concerned have completed this
complicated procedure and will soon let us know the results.

If perchance the notices may have arrived at the Yahoo site, but, like
far too many messages, haven't reached my mailbox, please excuse this
intrusion. Back to the Tabularium...

Optime ualete,

A. Tullia Scholastica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40989 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2005-12-27
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Q. Metellus A. Tulliae Quiritibusque sal.

The short answer is, simply, that we're working on it. The extended
answer, though, is that the conjunction of the Leges Fabia de Ratione as
well as the Lex Equitia de Vigintisexviris makes things take much longer
than, by law, they should. But let me demonstrate why.

Let's say that there are three candidates running for an office
(Candidates A, B, and C). By law, we have to rank each candidate for
each tribe or century as 1st, 2nd, and 3rd (and so on through all
candidates). If in counting these, there are ties for these places, the
ties would need to be broke to be able to rank, then finally count,
these. The diribitores are, by the Lex Equitia, forbidden to break
ties, so the results must be passed on to the Custodes to break the
ties. Then, we have two options: either we can leave it the burden of
the Custodes to continue the count from here (ranking, counting, and
breaking the final ties of the candidates, then reporting to the
presiding magistrate), or we can send the first set of broken ties back
to the Diribitores to make a final count, and ending with final ties.
Since the job of the Custodes is only to verify the count, break ties,
and report the results to the presiding magistrate, it would be sensible
that the results would be passed back to the Diribitores to continue the
count; then, these results would be passed back to the Custodes to
verify, break ties, and report to the presiding magistrate. This is
essentially where things have gotten so slow in this election (never
mind the inundation of votes in this election). Similarly, the Fabian
laws give 48 hours for the Rogatores to pass the results on to the
presiding magistrate. Since we are now using Diribitores and Custodes,
either each has 24 hours to do their job, or a time extention needs to
be added here.

Rest assured, though, I will be petitioning for some change for next
year, either in the form of a time extention or a change to allow the
Diribitores to break the first round of ties, to allow things to move
faster.

I hope this, at least partially, explains things.

Valete Bene,

Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
Diribitor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40990 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-27
Subject: a.d. VI Kal. Ian.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem VI Kalendas Ianuarius; haec dies comitialis est.


"It is no wonder, therefore, that the ancients looked upon this
country as sacred to Saturn, since they esteemed this god to be the
giver and accomplisher of all happiness to mankind,— whether he ought
to be called Cronus, as the Greeks deem fitting, or Saturn, as do the
Romans, — and regarded him as embracing the whole universe, by
whichever name he is called, and since they saw this country abounding
in universal plenty and every charm mankind craves, and judged those
places to be most agreeable both to divine and to human beings that
are suited to them — for example, the mountains and woods to Pan, the
meadows and verdant places to the nymphs, the shores and islands to
the sea-gods, and all there places to the god or genius to whom each
is appropriate. It is said also that the ancients sacrificed human
victims to Saturn, as was done at Carthage while that city stood and
as is there is done to this day among the Gauls and certain other
western nations, and that Hercules, desiring to abolish the custom of
this sacrifice, erected the altar upon the Saturnian hill and
performed the initial rites of sacrifice with unblemished victims
burning on a pure fire. And lest the people should feel any scruple at
having neglected their traditional sacrifices, he taught them to
appease the anger of the god by making effigies resembling the men
they had been wont to bind hand and foot and throw into the stream of
the Tiber, and dressing these in the same manner, to throw them into
the river instead of the men, his purpose being that any superstitious
dread remaining in the minds of all might be removed, since the
semblance of the ancient rite would still be preserved. This the
Romans continued to do every year even down to my day a little after
the vernal equinox, in the month of May, on what they call the Ides
(the day they mean to be the middle of the month); on this day, after
offering the preliminary sacrifices according to the laws, the
pontifices, as the most important of the priests are called, and with
them the virgins who guard the perpetual fire, the praetors, and such
of the other citizens as may lawfully be present at the rites, throw
from the sacred bridge into the stream of the Tiber thirty effigies
made in the likeness of men, which they call Argei. But concerning
the sacrifices and the other rites which the Roman people perform
according to the manner both of the Greeks and of their own country I
shall speak in another book. At present, it seems requisite to give a
more particular account of the arrival of Hercules in Italy and to
omit nothing worthy of notice that he did there.

Of the stories told concerning this god some are largely legend and
some are nearer the truth. The legendary account of his arrival is as
follows: Hercules, being commanded by Eurystheus, among other labours,
to drive Geryon's cattle from Erytheia to Argos, performed the task
and having passed through many parts of Italy on his way home, came
also to the neighbourhood of Pallantium in the country of the
Aborigines; and there, finding much excellent grass for his cattle, he
let them graze, and being overcome with weariness, lay down and gave
himself over to sleep. Thereupon a robber of that region, named Cacus,
chanced to come upon the cattle feeding with none to guard them and
longed to possess them. But seeing Hercules lying there asleep, he
imagined he could not drive them all away without being discovered and
at the same time he perceived that the task was no easy one, either.
So he secreted a few of them in the cave hard by, in which he lived,
dragging each of them thither by the tail backwards. This might have
destroyed all evidence of his theft, as the direction in which the
oxen had gone would be at variance with their tracks. Hercules, then,
arising from sleep soon afterwards, and having counted the cattle and
found some were missing, was for some time at a loss to guess where
they had gone, and supposing them to have strayed from their pasture,
he sought them up and down the region; then, when he failed to find
them, he came to the cave, and though he was deceived by the tracks,
he felt, nevertheless, that he ought to search the place. But Cacus
stood before the door, and when Hercules inquired after the cattle,
denied that he had seen them, and when the other desired to search his
cave, would not suffer him to do so, to be called upon his neighbours
for assistance, complaining of the violence offered to him by the
stranger. And while Hercules was puzzled to know how he should act in
the matter, he hit upon the expedient of driving the rest of the
cattle to the cave. And thus, when those inside heard the lowing and
perceived the smell of their companions outside, they bellowed to them
in turn and thus their lowing betrayed the theft. Cacus, therefore,
when his thievery was thus brought to light, put himself upon his
defence and began to call out to his fellow herdsmen. But Hercules
killed him by smiting him with his club and drove out the cattle; and
when he saw that the place was well adapted to the harbouring of
evil-doers, he demolished the cave, burying the robber under its
ruins. Then, having purified himself in the river from the murder, he
erected an altar near the place to Jupiter the Discoverer, which is
now in Rome near the Porta Trigemina, and sacrificed a calf to the god
as a thank-offering for the finding of his cattle. This sacrifice the
city of Rome continued to celebrate even down to my day, observing in
it all the ceremonies of the Greeks just as he instituted them." -
Dionysis of Halicarnassus, "Roman Antiquities", 1.38-39


"After having been twice driven back by heavy southwestern gales, Her
Majesty's ship Beagle, a ten-gun brig, under the command of Captain
Fitz Roy, R. N., sailed from Devonport on the 27th of December, 1831.
The object of the expedition was to complete the survey of Patagonia
and Tierra del Fuego, commenced under Captain King in 1826 to 1830, --
to survey the shores of Chile, Peru, and of some islands in the
Pacific—and to carry a chain of chronometrical measurements round the
World." - Charles Darwin, "The Voyage of the Beagle", which set sail
on 27 December 1831


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysis of Halicarnassus, Darwin
(http://www2.lucidcafe.com/lucidcafe/library/96feb/darwin.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40991 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-27
Subject: Re: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - the election has occurred
C. Equitius Cato F. Galerio Aureliano quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

A very astute perspective on the relations between the Plebs and the
Patricians. The Patricians, having been either legislatively
manoeuvred or simply robbed outright of so many of their historic
rights and powers over the centuries, struggle to maintain and, if
possible, expand their prerogatives, and will often attempt to support
their expansionist aims by appealing to the very masses by whom their
powers were taken --- and will *always* attempt to do so by keeping
the Plebeian magistrates squabbling amongst themselves and thus far
less vigilant against the Patricians' attempts to increase their power.

I mean, that's the historic background. It certainly doesn't apply to
our Republic, as the differences between the Plebs and Patricians are
basically nominal.

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40992 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-27
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
A. Apollonius Q. Metello omnibusque sal.

I'm glad to hear you and your colleagues have
identified the problems and are intending to put
forward some suggestions to prevent them recurring.
It's a hard job, and even without the two-layer
heirarchy we had a couple of close calls last year,
and even one occasion when we missed the deadline by a
few hours. At the risk of sounding uncharitable,
though, I would like to draw your and your colleagues'
attention to the fact that this happened in the summer
as well.

At that time I wondered whether the system introduced
by the lex Equitia might be slowing things down and -
you may remember - I encouraged you all to look at
what had gone wrong and see whether the problems of
the summer had been caused by systemic problems like
the ones you're now talking about. My hope was that
those problems could be identified and solved before
the big electoral and legislative sessions of the
autumn. But at that time the populus was assured that
the problem was a one-off and no changes to the system
were needed.

I don't remind you of this to criticise, but rather to
show all magistrates, present and future, who have
technical jobs like vote-counting or running the
website that if they find their jobs being made
difficult by unintended consequences of legislation
they should not hesitate to speak up and ask for
changes.

Finally, speaking of changes, I suspect that if this
year is anything like last year you're getting a lot
of ties in tribes and particularly in centuries which
contain only two voters. Last year we came to the
conclusion that it would be helpful to reduce the
number of centuries from the current 51 to a number
closer to 25, thus increasing the average size of
centuries and reducing the likelihood of ties
occurring. I mention this for consideration in the
package of changes you intend to suggest. Of course in
the long run the solution to the large number of ties
is to increase the number of voters.

Many thanks to you and your colleagues for all your
hard work.





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40993 From: Tiberius Antonius Romulus Date: 2005-12-27
Subject: Eras Rome owned Mesopatamia
At what times did Rome have Mesopotamia and who were the Emperors over
it? I really need to get some better maps of all the eras. Any help
appreciated.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40994 From: Susan Davis Date: 2005-12-27
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
> Have the diribitores captured and counted the votes?

No; the effort is in progress, but it's a Herculean task, and the
election was cleverly timed to fall at the worst possible time for
people to have enough free time to do this. We've currently counted
the Comitia Centuriata, and reconciled the discrepancies between our
vote counts; the results are in the hands of the Custodes for
tie-breaking, and then the results will be reported.

One Diribitor has completed a count of the Comitia Populi Tributa.
Another is 2/3 of the way through, one has resigned, and the fourth is
unavailable for this vote. We'll need to reconcile the differences in
that much more complex count, and from early indications, there are a
*lot* of ties to resolve.

After that, the Comitia Plebis Tributa. I hope we're done by the turn
of the year....

Bottom line: for the December magistrate elections, 48 hours is not
remotely close to the amount of time that it takes to accurately count
the plethora of votes, especially if magistrates have crammed in a
sizeable legislative program on top of the magistrate elections. A
better solution would be to automate the office of Diribitor out of
existence, set everything up with a Ruby script on the web site, and
let the Custodes just audit the audit trail. That won't happen for
this election.

Claudia Iulia
Diribitrix
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40995 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2005-12-27
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
> A better solution would be to automate the office of Diribitor out of
> existence, set everything up with a Ruby script on the web site, and
> let the Custodes just audit the audit trail. That won't happen for
> this election.

That's what we had, once (but in Perl of course); in '01 and '02 the
counting was automated, and the results delivered within hours of
the election's closing.

Unfortunately, in almost every year since then, the Consules and Tribunes
have changed the rules (particularly with regard to resolving ties and
choosing overall winners). Almost all of these changes were done
without consulting the webmaster and rogatores to find out how
difficult they would be to implement.

A few of these changes were incorporated in the script - but the next
year would just bring another set of revisions, and then another -
it became too frustrating to have to keep rewriting the thing based
on each consul's whims, so I stopped.

Vale, O.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40996 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-12-27
Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia! - Merry Christmas!
Cn. Lentulus quaestor candidatus: Pompeiae Straboni consuli candidatae: sal.:

>>> I saw your website....you look so Roman, amice. <<<

Thank you very much, amica! My toga is my pride :-) It takes half an hour at least to drap it.

>>> But I hope Santa will bring you some caligae to compliment your well draped toga! <<<

Unfortunately, Christas is gone but Santa did not bring me any caligae :-(
Pehraps next year...? ;-)
By the way, this picture was made at my home where there is an excellent floor-heating, by the good Roman tradition in the northern provinces like my Pannonia :-)
What is the caliga here for???

Vale!


Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
QUAESTOR CANDIDATUS
www.cnlentulus.iweb.hu
-------------------------------
Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
Accensus Consulis Fr. Apuli Caesaris
Scriba Aedilis Curulis L. Iulii Sullae
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae Scholasticae Senior
Scriba Magistri Araneari C. Minuci Scaevolae Iunior
Sodalis Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Latinista, Classicus Philologus



---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40997 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
> A. Tullia Q. Metello quiritibusque omnibus S.P.D.
>
> Q. Metellus A. Tulliae Quiritibusque sal.
>
> The short answer is, simply, that we're working on it. The extended
> answer, though, is that the conjunction of the Leges Fabia de Ratione as
> well as the Lex Equitia de Vigintisexviris makes things take much longer
> than, by law, they should. But let me demonstrate why.
>
> Let's say that there are three candidates running for an office
> (Candidates A, B, and C). By law, we have to rank each candidate for
> each tribe or century as 1st, 2nd, and 3rd (and so on through all
> candidates). If in counting these, there are ties for these places, the
> ties would need to be broke to be able to rank, then finally count,
> these. The diribitores are, by the Lex Equitia, forbidden to break
> ties, so the results must be passed on to the Custodes to break the
> ties. Then, we have two options: either we can leave it the burden of
> the Custodes to continue the count from here (ranking, counting, and
> breaking the final ties of the candidates, then reporting to the
> presiding magistrate), or we can send the first set of broken ties back
> to the Diribitores to make a final count, and ending with final ties.
> Since the job of the Custodes is only to verify the count, break ties,
> and report the results to the presiding magistrate, it would be sensible
> that the results would be passed back to the Diribitores to continue the
> count; then, these results would be passed back to the Custodes to
> verify, break ties, and report to the presiding magistrate. This is
> essentially where things have gotten so slow in this election (never
> mind the inundation of votes in this election). Similarly, the Fabian
> laws give 48 hours for the Rogatores to pass the results on to the
> presiding magistrate. Since we are now using Diribitores and Custodes,
> either each has 24 hours to do their job, or a time extention needs to
> be added here.
>
> Rest assured, though, I will be petitioning for some change for next
> year, either in the form of a time extention or a change to allow the
> Diribitores to break the first round of ties, to allow things to move
> faster.
>
> ATS: Yes, I think that the time limits are too short, too‹especially if
> one expects to do anything so bold as eat or sleep. On the other hand,
> though, I think it¹s good to have a second set of officials verifying the
> count‹I could use a Borg eyepiece or something to correct the laws, believe
> me...I¹m sure I missed some errors, even egregious ones, due to the straitened
> time limitations. With luck I¹ll have time to go back and pick these up.
>
> I hope this, at least partially, explains things.
>
> ATS: Sane. No one ever said that any of our magistrates, vigintisexviri
> included, had an easy time of it‹it¹s a hard job, and I¹m sure you¹re doing
> your best.
>
> Valete Bene,
>
> Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
> Diribitor
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40998 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
> A. Tullia Scholastica Claudiae Iuliae quiritibusque omnibus S.P.D.
>
>> > Have the diribitores captured and counted the votes?
>
> No; the effort is in progress, but it's a Herculean task,
>
> ATS: That it is!
>
> and the
> election was cleverly timed to fall at the worst possible time for
> people to have enough free time to do this.
>
> ATS: Yes, it was positively diabolical. Perhaps we need a law changing
> the timing of the election so that it won¹t conflict with the major civil
> holidays. However, exam periods are difficult for students (and several
> citizens are students), and in a world-wide organization, it¹s hard to avoid
> stepping on some toes in that regard.
>
> We've currently counted
> the Comitia Centuriata, and reconciled the discrepancies between our
> vote counts; the results are in the hands of the Custodes for
> tie-breaking, and then the results will be reported.
>
> One Diribitor has completed a count of the Comitia Populi Tributa.
> Another is 2/3 of the way through, one has resigned, and the fourth is
> unavailable for this vote. We'll need to reconcile the differences in
> that much more complex count, and from early indications, there are a
> *lot* of ties to resolve.
>
> ATS: Glad to hear you¹re making a lot of progress. It is, however,
> disheartening to learn that yet another magistrate has quit just when work had
> to be done, and another couldn¹t perform his or her duties. As I said
> earlier, it¹s no secret that the main election‹and effectively the ONLY
> election this year‹falls over the biggest civil holiday period. There¹s this
> Roman virtue, pietas...
>
> After that, the Comitia Plebis Tributa. I hope we're done by the turn
> of the year....
>
> ATS: We may have to invoke some laws which prolong the terms of the
> present magistrates if the election cannot be certified in time for the
> beginning of the next magisterial terms, lest we be left with one censor and
> several censorial scribae, plus provincial magistrates‹and no other
> magistrates. That is my concern.
>
> Bottom line: for the December magistrate elections, 48 hours is not
> remotely close to the amount of time that it takes to accurately count
> the plethora of votes,
>
> ATS: No, it isn¹t‹and I believe that that is the requirement in every law
> I¹ve corrected so far (almost all of them...).
>
> especially if magistrates have crammed in a
> sizeable legislative program on top of the magistrate elections.
>
> ATS: And that is almost always the case.
>
> A
> better solution would be to automate the office of Diribitor out of
> existence, set everything up with a Ruby script on the web site, and
> let the Custodes just audit the audit trail. That won't happen for
> this election.
>
> ATS: Well, not being a cybernaut, I don¹t know what a Ruby script is, but
> I know that webmaster Scaeuola has some neat tricks up his sleeve, one of
> which just saved both of us considerable work on revising laws that were
> already corrected to change a single word as required by a subsequent law.
>
> Those rubies wouldn¹t be related to the ones Yahoo tells us about in the
> censorial cohors, now would they? Since Marinus¹ initials spell Œgem,¹ Yahoo
> in its infinite brilliance keeps sending us ads about gems and rubies... ;-)
> (yes, I know they aren¹t...)
>
> At least two laws mention automated means of counting votes, but as M.
> Octavius Germanicus observes in a later post, the rules keep changing, so it¹s
> difficult to keep up with that. We now have a more historic system, and I
> think we should keep it‹but make it easier for all those concerned by giving
> more time, calling the election earlier, and perhaps making some other simple
> changes.
>
>
> Claudia Iulia
> Diribitrix
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 40999 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
> A. Tullia Scholastica A. Apollonio Cordo quiritibusque omnibus S.P.D.
>
> A. Apollonius Q. Metello omnibusque sal.
>
> I'm glad to hear you and your colleagues have
> identified the problems and are intending to put
> forward some suggestions to prevent them recurring.
> It's a hard job, and even without the two-layer
> heirarchy we had a couple of close calls last year,
> and even one occasion when we missed the deadline by a
> few hours. At the risk of sounding uncharitable,
> though, I would like to draw your and your colleagues'
> attention to the fact that this happened in the summer
> as well.
>
> At that time I wondered whether the system introduced
> by the lex Equitia might be slowing things down and -
> you may remember - I encouraged you all to look at
> what had gone wrong and see whether the problems of
> the summer had been caused by systemic problems like
> the ones you're now talking about. My hope was that
> those problems could be identified and solved before
> the big electoral and legislative sessions of the
> autumn. But at that time the populus was assured that
> the problem was a one-off and no changes to the system
> were needed.
>
> I don't remind you of this to criticise, but rather to
> show all magistrates, present and future, who have
> technical jobs like vote-counting or running the
> website that if they find their jobs being made
> difficult by unintended consequences of legislation
> they should not hesitate to speak up and ask for
> changes.
>
> Finally, speaking of changes, I suspect that if this
> year is anything like last year you're getting a lot
> of ties in tribes and particularly in centuries which
> contain only two voters. Last year we came to the
> conclusion that it would be helpful to reduce the
> number of centuries from the current 51 to a number
> closer to 25, thus increasing the average size of
> centuries and reducing the likelihood of ties
> occurring. I mention this for consideration in the
> package of changes you intend to suggest. Of course in
> the long run the solution to the large number of ties
> is to increase the number of voters.
>
> ATS: It might be wise to see to it that tribes and centuries have an odd
> number of members, but increasing the size thereof by decreasing their number
> would be grossly unfair to those who have worked for the RP and stuck it
> out‹and expected some reward in the form of having their votes count more. It
> also would require rewriting the programs which automatically allocate people
> to tribes and centuries, which, of course, would be a huge amount of work for
> the webmaster, who would almost certainly have to work with Marcus Octavius
> Germanicus, who is about to start graduate school. That, you see, is another
> perhaps unintended consequence of such a change.
>
> The smallest centuries I know about have four voters...is there something
> smaller than that?
>
> Yes, it would be good to get more people to vote‹and scheduling the main
> election during the one or two weeks in the year when the most people are
> likely to be away from home is no help in that regard. This year the civil
> calendar made this even more difficult, but one must look at the calendar‹and
> not just the Roman one‹when making these decisions.
>
> Many thanks to you and your colleagues for all your
> hard work.
>
> ATS: Indeed. It¹s a very hard job‹as Cordus knows quite well, having
> performed it under a different set of rules.
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41000 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: a.d. V Kal. Ian.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem V Kalendas Ianuarius; haec dies comitialis est.


"But the story which comes nearer to the truth and which has been
adopted by many who have narrated his deeds in the form of history is
as follows: Hercules, who was the greatest commander of his age,
marched at the head of a large force through all the country that lies
on this side of the Ocean, destroying any despotisms that were
grievous and oppressive to their subjects, or commonwealths that
outraged and injured the neighbouring states, or organized bands of
men who lived in the manner of savages and lawlessly put strangers to
death, and in their room establishing lawful monarchies, well-ordered
governments and humane and sociable modes of life. Furthermore, he
mingled barbarians with Greeks, and inhabitants of the inland with
dwellers on the sea coast, groups which hitherto had been distrustful
and unsocial in their dealings with each other; he also built cities
in desert places, turned the course of rivers that overflowed the
fields, cut roads through inaccessible mountains, and contrived other
means by which every land and sea might lie open to the use of all
mankind. And he came into Italy not alone nor yet bringing a herd of
cattle (for neither does this country lies on the road of those
returning from Spain to Argos nor would he have been deemed worthy of
so great an honour merely for passing through it), but at the head of
a great army, after he had already conquered Spain, in order to
subjugate and rule the people in this region; and he was obliged to
tarry there a considerable time both because of the absence of his
fleet, due to stormy weather that detained it, and because not all the
nations of Italy willingly submitted to him. For, besides the other
barbarians, the Ligurians, a numerous and warlike people seated in the
passes of the Alps, endeavoured to prevent his entrance into Italy by
force of arms, and in that place so great a battle was fought by the
Greeks that all their missiles gave out in the course of the fighting.
This war is mentioned by Aeschylus, among the ancient poets, in his
Prometheus Unbound; for there Prometheus is represented as foretelling
to Hercules in detail how everything else was to befall him on his
expedition against Geryon and in particular recounting to him the
difficult struggle he was to have in the war with the Ligurians. The
verses are these:

'And thou shalt come to Liguria's dauntless host,
Where no fault shalt thou find, bold though thou art,
With the fray: 'tis fated thy missiles all shall fail.'

After Hercules had defeated this people and gained the passes, some
delivered up their cities to him of their own accord, particularly
those who were any other Greek extraction or who had no considerable
forces; but the greatest part of them were reduced by war and siege.
Among those who were conquered in battle, they say, was Cacus, who is
celebrated in the Roman legend, an exceedingly barbarous chieftain
reigning over a savage people, who had set himself to oppose Hercules;
he was established in the fastnesses and on that account was a pest to
his neighbours. He, when he heard that Hercules lay encamped in the
plain hard by, equipped his followers like brigands and making a
sudden raid while the army lay sleeping, he surrounded and drove off
as much of their booty as he found unguarded. Afterwards, being
besieged by the Greeks, he not only saw his forts taken by storm, but
was himself slain amid his fastnesses. And when his forts had been
demolished, those who had accompanied Hercules on the expedition
(these were some Arcadians with Evander, and Faunus, king of the
Aborigines) took over the districts round about, each group for
itself. And it may be conjecture days that those of the Greeks who
remained there, that is, the Epeans and the Arcadians from Pheneus, as
well as the Trojans, were left to guard the country. For among the
various measures of Hercules that bespoke the true general none was
more worthy of admiration than his practice of carrying along with him
for a time on his expeditions the prisoners taken from the captured
cities, and then, after they had cheerfully assisted him in his wars,
settling them in the conquered regions and bestowing on them the
riches he had gained from others. It was because of these deeds that
Hercules gained the greatest name and renown in Italy, and not because
of his passage through it, which was attended by nothing worthy of
veneration.

Some say that he also left sons by two women in the region now
inhabited by the Romans. One of these sons was Pallas, whom he had by
the daughter of Evander, whose name, they say, was Lavinia; the other,
Latinus, whose mother was a certain Hyperborean girl whom he brought
with him as a hostage given to him by her father and preserved for
some time untouched; but while he was on his voyage to Italy, he fell
in love with her and got her with child. And when he was preparing to
leave for Argos, he married her to Faunus, king of the Aborigines; for
which reason Latinus is generally looked upon as the son of Faunus,
not of Hercules. Pallas, they say, died before he arrived at puberty;
but Latinus, upon reaching man's estate, succeeded to the kingdom of
the Aborigines, and when he was killed in the battle against the
neighbouring Rutulians, without leaving any male issue, the kingdom
devolved on Aeneas, the son of Anchises, his son-in‑law. But these
things happened at other times." - Dionysis of Halicarnassus, "Roman
Antiquities", 1.41-43


"Herod perceiving that he was deluded by the wise men, was exceeding
angry; and sending killed all the male children that were in
Bethlehem, and in all the borders thereof, from two years old and
under, according to the time which he had diligently inquired of the
wise men. Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremias the
prophet, saying: A voice in Rama was heard, lamentation and great
mourning; Rachel bewailing her children, and would not be comforted,
because they are not." - Matthew 2:16-18

"In consequence probably of the feeling of horror attached to such an
act of atrocity, Innocents' Day used to be reckoned about the most
unlucky through-out the year, and in former times, no one who could
possibly avoid it, began any work, or entered on any undertaking, on
this anniversary. To marry on Childermas Day was especially
inauspicious. It is said of the equally superstitious and unprincipled
monarch, Louis XI., that he would never perform any business, or
enter into any discussion about his affairs on this day, and to make
to him then any proposal of the kind, was certain to exasperate him to
the utmost. We are informed, too, that in England, on the occasion of
the coronation of King Edward IV, that solemnity, which had been
originally intended to take place on a Sunday, was postponed till the
Monday, owing to the former day being in that year the festival of
Childermas. This idea of the inauspicious nature of the day was long
prevalent, and is even yet not wholly extinct. To the present hour we
understand the housewives in Cornwall, and probably also in other
parts of the country, refrain scrupulously from scouring or scrubbing
on Innocents' Day." - Chamber's Book of Days, Philadelphia: J. B.
Lippincott & Co. (1879)

Today is the feast of the Holy Innocents (in the old style
"Childermas"), in honor of the children slain at Herod the Great's
order to try to kill the child Jesus. This attempt led Joseph to take
Mary and Jesus away to Egypt, where they lived until Herod had died.


Valete bene!

Cato




SOURCES

Dionysis of Halicarnassus, Childermas
(http://www.library.wisc.edu/etext/BookofDays/BoDHome.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41001 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
A. Apollonius A. Tulliae omnibusque sal.

> > ATS: It might be wise to see to it that
> tribes and centuries have an odd
> > number of members, but increasing the size thereof
> by decreasing their number
> > would be grossly unfair to those who have worked
> for the RP and stuck it
> > out‹and expected some reward in the form of having
> their votes count more.

The problem is that, even if every voting-unit
contains an odd number of people, there's no guarantee
that an odd number of people in each unit will
actually vote. If a unit contains three people and one
doesn't vote then the problem reappears. And remember
also that each voter can usually cast more than one
vote, so even if the number of voters is odd the
number of votes may be even.

The likelihood of ties occurring in a unit increases
inversely to two things: the number of voters in the
unit and the number of candidates. The number of
vacancies is also a factor, but less directly so, so
let's not worry about it for now. One of the most
probably situations for a tie is when there are two
candidates, two voters, and each voter casts only one
vote. You can see that there's essentially a 50%
chance of a tie in that voting-unit. If everything
else remains the same but we increase the number of
voters to four, the probability of a tie goes down to
37.5%. And so on as we double the number. So if we
can't guarantee an odd number of votes cast in each
unit, which we can't, we can at least decrease the
likelihood of ties by increasing the number of voters
in the unit.

As for reducing people's voting-power, that's not a
problem as long as the same thing is done to every
unit. Voting-power is relative, not absolute. What
matters is that X has a more powerful vote than Y.
Currently the seven most powerful centuries contain
only three voters each; the next most powerful century
contains four. So a voter in century I is a bit more
than 8% more powerful than a voter in century VIII.
All we would need to do is preserve that ratio. For
example, if we increase the size of century I to five
voters and the size of century VIII to nine voters, a
voter in century I will then be just under 9% more
powerful than a voter in century VIII, roughly the
same ratio.





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41002 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

One more idea which might be worth reviving. Last year
C. Livia suggested going back to the middle-republican
practice of beginning the civil year on the 15th of
March, not on the 1st of January.

That would mean the diribitores and custodes wouldn't
have to count votes during the
Saturnalia-Christmas-Hannukah holidays at all.
Elections could normally be held in late January,
which has a long run of dies comitiales; and if they
were delayed for some reason there would still be the
patch of dies comitiales in early March to fall back
on. I think either of those times would be better for
holding elections than November and December.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41003 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: EDICTVM CENSORIVM DE SENATU
EDICTVM CENSORIVM

While the results of the December elections have not yet been published,
the Lex Popillia Senatoria was not contested and will likely pass. One
of the requirements of the Lex Popillia Senatoria is for the Censors to
establish the maximum possible size of the Senate after each Census.

The Lex Popillia Senatoria requires that the maximum size of the Senate
be set at 15% of the tax paying (assidui) population. Our recently
concluded census established that we have 238 assidui. Therefore the
maximum size of the Senate until the conclusion of the next census shall
be 36 Senators.

Hoc edictum ilico valet.

This edict takes effect immediately.

Datum sub manibus nostris ante diem V Kal. IANVARIAS MMDCCLVIII

Given under our hands the 28th day of December, 2005 CE, 2758 a.u.c.

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus

Censores, Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41004 From: Titus Marcius Felix Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: de Suffragiis
Salvate amicus,

My opinion is that we must automatize the elections, being that in this scene the figure of the diribitores and custodes would pass to verify and to validate the process.

I have I worked in the Brazilian electoral process, that is in the present time the biggest automatize election of the world and has experience and ability to mount a safe process and of easy accompaniment.

if he will be of the desire of our republic I commit myself to mount the process for 2006 using the structure of the website.

How much to the question security this is my specialty. being my academic formation in the chairs of mathematics and computer science.

Bene Vale.
Titus Marcius Felix



---------------------------------
Yahoo! doce lar. Faça do Yahoo! sua homepage.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41005 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
> My opinion is that we must automatize the elections, being that in this scene
> the figure of the diribitores and custodes would pass to verify and to validate the process.

I'd be willing to work with the new Consuls, Tribunes, and Magister to accomplish this.
We'd need to review and streamline the various laws controlling this - make them
consistent and reasonable - and then implement the solution.

Vale, Octavius.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41006 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: YAHOO GROUPS DOWN TIME TONIGHT
A. Tullia Scholastica omnibus S.P.D.

For those who haven't visited any of the actual websites of the Yahoo
groups lately, I must call something to your attention: there is a notice
that Yahoo will start taking the groups down for maintenance and upgrading
of the photos section starting this evening at 9 p.m. California time, or
about midnight Eastern U.S. time. They expect to finish the following
morning, but also mention that this may be delayed.

Since we now do not know when this board will be taken offline, or how
long that will last, it is all the more important for truly important
messages (elections, etc.) to be posted BEFORE then--they said that other
messages would be queued for later delivery, and we know that some
"ordinary" deliveries go to the Andromeda nebula first, or hit Cygnus X-1
and never appear as is.

Valete,

A. Tullia Scholastica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41007 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia! - Merry Christmas!
> A. Tullia Scholastica Cn. Cornelio Lentulo Pompeiae Minuciae Straboni
> quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque omnibus S.P.D.
>
> Cn. Lentulus quaestor candidatus: Pompeiae Straboni consuli candidatae: sal.:
>
>>>> >>> I saw your website....you look so Roman, amice. <<<
>
> Thank you very much, amica! My toga is my pride :-) It takes half an hour at
> least to drap it.
>
>>>> >>> But I hope Santa will bring you some caligae to compliment your well
>>>> draped toga! <<<
>
> ATS: Well, caligae aren¹t the best complements for togae‹they go MUCH
> better with assorted loricae. Caligae were (and are) hobnailed military
> boots, not the sort of thing one wears indoors. (and the Romans didn¹t have
> duct tape to put over the hobnails so that they didn¹t tear up the floors and
> subject the wearer to falls...). Our Lentulus might opt for something else,
> say, calcei, though these are a lot harder to get. We ladies suffer from a
> similar problem re carbatinae.
>
> Unfortunately, Christas is gone but Santa did not bring me any caligae :-(
> Pehraps next year...? ;-)
> By the way, this picture was made at my home where there is an excellent
> floor-heating, by the good Roman tradition in the northern provinces like my
> Pannonia :-)
> What is the caliga here for???
>
>
>
> Vale!
>
>
> Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
> QUAESTOR CANDIDATUS
>
>
> www.cnlentulus.iweb.hu
> -------------------------------
> Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
> Accensus Consulis Fr. Apuli Caesaris
> Scriba Aedilis Curulis L. Iulii Sullae
> Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae Scholasticae Senior
> Scriba Magistri Araneari C. Minuci Scaevolae Iunior
> Sodalis Sodalitatis Latinitatis
> Latinista, Classicus Philologus
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41008 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
> A. Tullia Scholastica A. Apollonio Cordo quiritibusque omnibus S.P.D.
>
> A. Apollonius omnibus sal.
>
> One more idea which might be worth reviving. Last year
> C. Livia suggested going back to the middle-republican
> practice of beginning the civil year on the 15th of
> March, not on the 1st of January.
>
> ATS: Wasn¹t it March first at some point? Martiis caelebs quid agam
> Kalendis...which was both mothers¹ day and new year¹s day, or so we were told
> when studying this poem.
>
> That would mean the diribitores and custodes wouldn't
> have to count votes during the
> Saturnalia-Christmas-Hannukah holidays at all.
>
> ATS: Yes, and it would make good sense. However, some of the activities
> at that time of year are strictly voluntary‹one must eat, so one might as well
> cook a big dinner and invite guests for the holiday, but there¹s no need for
> daily parties (unless one is running a restaurant...), and (retailers to the
> contrary), unless one has children between two and seven or so, one doesn¹t
> HAVE to produce gifts on a set day; one can simply say that due to
> circumstances beyond his or her control, gifts will be distributed at a
> different time (use the Russian Orthodox calendar...Christmas is January 5th
> or so, or the sensible Hispanic custom of exchanging gifts on Epiphany).
> Hanukkah seems to involve less of the gift-giving, and I don¹t know that
> Saturnalia has any such custom‹though one is supposed to exchange places with
> one¹s servants (fat chance of anyone but Bill Gates having those any more...).
> The rest is just a cultural notion, much as the notion that one should adjust
> one¹s hemlines according to the fashion of the moment. We academics are here
> to challenge such notions...what we can¹t do, however, is change the calendar,
> which states that Christmas and New Year¹s are civil holidays, and that this
> year they fall on Sunday, meaning that the entire preceding week became a
> holiday in certain quarters (not here; our schools were in session until the
> end of Thursday) as well as the week between them.
>
> Elections could normally be held in late January,
> which has a long run of dies comitiales; and if they
> were delayed for some reason there would still be the
> patch of dies comitiales in early March to fall back
> on. I think either of those times would be better for
> holding elections than November and December.
>
> ATS: This makes wonderful sense to me. There is no perfect time, but
> this avoids exam times in most colleges and universities in the U.S., as well
> as any normal vacation periods. It might interfere with the minimal January
> exams in schools, but that is a minor issue. I suspect that it wouldn¹t be
> too disruptive elsewhere as well, though if the British schools really do have
> a Candlemas term, that might start rather later (Feb. 2) and might interfere
> with vacation‹unless, of course, they are being metaphorical about this date.
>
>
> Optime vale et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41009 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Salve


One more idea; the Plebeian Tribunes of ancient Rome
were elected at 10th december.
Based in the tradition, the elections in the Comitia
Plebis can be moved to november, and the Tribunes can
take office at 10/dec.


Vale
M.Arminius

--- "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@...> escreveu:

> A. Apollonius omnibus sal.
>
> One more idea which might be worth reviving. Last
> year
> C. Livia suggested going back to the
> middle-republican
> practice of beginning the civil year on the 15th of
> March, not on the 1st of January.
>
> That would mean the diribitores and custodes
> wouldn't
> have to count votes during the
> Saturnalia-Christmas-Hannukah holidays at all.
> Elections could normally be held in late January,
> which has a long run of dies comitiales; and if they
> were delayed for some reason there would still be
> the
> patch of dies comitiales in early March to fall back
> on. I think either of those times would be better
> for
> holding elections than November and December.









_______________________________________________________
Yahoo! doce lar. Faça do Yahoo! sua homepage.
http://br.yahoo.com/homepageset.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41010 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
M. Hortensia M. Arminio Maiori A. Apollonio Cordoque spd;
well it sounds like an excellent idea to start the year in
March & have the elections then. Remember December is very hard on
those of us in school as well, exams, papers are due & it's a killer
and then holidays. I talked to Metellus and he was counting votes
Christmas day, which is pretty cruel even if it's not your holiday.
That was the big problem for us; Saturninus & I are in school and
the others were away on business trips etc and then Saturnalia,
Christmas, Hannukah!
valete
Marca Hortensia Maior TRP

> One more idea; the Plebeian Tribunes of ancient Rome
> were elected at 10th december.
> Based in the tradition, the elections in the Comitia
> Plebis can be moved to november, and the Tribunes can
> take office at 10/dec.
>
>
> Vale
> M.Arminius
>
> --- "A. Apollonius Cordus"
> <a_apollonius_cordus@y...> escreveu:
>
> > A. Apollonius omnibus sal.
> >
> > One more idea which might be worth reviving. Last
> > year
> > C. Livia suggested going back to the
> > middle-republican
> > practice of beginning the civil year on the 15th of
> > March, not on the 1st of January.
> >
> > That would mean the diribitores and custodes
> > wouldn't
> > have to count votes during the
> > Saturnalia-Christmas-Hannukah holidays at all.
> > Elections could normally be held in late January,
> > which has a long run of dies comitiales; and if they
> > were delayed for some reason there would still be
> > the
> > patch of dies comitiales in early March to fall back
> > on. I think either of those times would be better
> > for
> > holding elections than November and December.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Yahoo! doce lar. Faça do Yahoo! sua homepage.
> http://br.yahoo.com/homepageset.html
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41011 From: Susan Davis Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M Arminius Maior <marminius@y...> wrote:
>
> One more idea; the Plebeian Tribunes of ancient Rome
> were elected at 10th december.
> Based in the tradition, the elections in the Comitia
> Plebis can be moved to november, and the Tribunes can
> take office at 10/dec.

Along these lines, it would also be good to move the election of
Custodes and Diribitors (or whatever offices survive after a
hypothetical reform after the vote-counting were automated) to a
different time than the election of other magistrates (preferably
before). As it is, serving as a Diribitor or Custos prevents one from
standing for any office in the following year, which could deter
people from stepping forward.

Vale,
Claudia Iulia
Diribitrix
(Even worse, one could resign in order to stand for another office,
leaving NR shorthanded just as vote-counters are needed most.)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41012 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Salvete omnes,

I don't favor the idea of moving the inauguration of new magistrates
back to the Kalends of March. It is not in keeping with the practices
of the late Republic, and it would mean that some magistrates would
serve terms of 15 months.

A better way of dealing with the problem of the vote counting would be
to conduct our annual elections at the same time the Romans of antiquity
conducted theirs, in late summer or fall. Or if that seems like too
much time to allow, then at least conduct the elections during November,
when we have a long run of dies comitialis. The last half of September,
and the last half of October also deserve consideration. Both have nice
long intervals of consecutive dies comitiales.

However, we should not change the day on which the new curule
magistrates take office from 1 January. (When the plebeian magistrates
take office is not a matter of my concern, though the historical date in
mid-December is worth considering.)

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41013 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2005-12-28
Subject: Re: Eras Rome owned Mesopatamia
Salve


Mesopotamia, technically the land between the rives
Tigris and Euphrates, had a common frontier with the
roman empire since the conquest of Syria by Pompey, in
64 B.C.
Both Crassus and Mark Antony attacked the Parthian
Empire and failed to conquer Mesopotamia, and the
situation became more or less stable, salvo minor
incidents, for a century and half.
The Emperor Trajan invaded Mesopotamia, defeated the
Parthians and reached the Persian Gulf, occupying the
region between 114-117 AD, when a great revolt make
him withdraw from the south; he died at the same year,
and his succesor Hadrian retired from the rest of
Mesopotamia.
Marcus Aurelius, in 165 AD, saw his general Avidius
Cassius invade and sack the parthian capital of
Mesopotamia, Ctesiphon, and his army returned with a
devastating epidemics that ravaged the Empire.
Septimius Severus attacked the parthians between
195-199 AD, conquered the cities of Edessa and
Nisibis, sacked Ctesiphon again, and created the
provinces of Osrhoene and Mesopotamia.
Caracalla attacked the city of Arbela in 216 AD, but
retreated, and was assassinated.
Soon the Parthians were replaced by the Persians, and
his new empire was stronger; in 253 AD, the persian
king Shapur I invaded the east, and Antiochia, capital
of Syria, was sacked; in 260 AD, the emperor
Valerianus was captured.
For some time, 260-272 AD, the region was controlled
by the Palmyrians; but they conquered Egypt and Asia
Minor, and forced Aurelianus to reconquer them in 272
AD; Palmyra was destroyed one year later.
In 363 AD, Julianus "the apostate" invaded Mesopotamia
but died there. Jovianus was defeated by Shapur II,
and lost the Mesopotamian provinces.
From then until the V century, the frontier was more
or less stable.

Some maps:
http://www.euratlas.com/time1.htm

Some books with maps:
The Penguin Atlas of Ancient Rome, Chris Scarre
The Atlas of Ancient History, Colin McEvedy


Vale
M.Arminius



--- Tiberius Antonius Romulus
<chrismidwestwisconsin@...> escreveu:
> At what times did Rome have Mesopotamia and who were
> the Emperors over
> it? I really need to get some better maps of all
> the eras. Any help
> appreciated.









_______________________________________________________
Yahoo! doce lar. Faça do Yahoo! sua homepage.
http://br.yahoo.com/homepageset.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41014 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: EDICTVM CENSORIVM DE SENATU
EDICTVM CENSORIVM

While the results of the December elections have not yet been published,
the Lex Popillia Senatoria was not contested and will likely pass. One
of the requirements of the Lex Popillia Senatoria is for the Censors to
establish the maximum possible size of the Senate after each Census.

The Lex Popillia Senatoria requires that the maximum size of the Senate
be set at 15% of the tax paying (assidui) population. Our recently
concluded census established that we have 238 assidui. Therefore the
maximum size of the Senate until the conclusion of the next census shall
be 36 Senators.

This edict takes effect upon approval of the Lex Popillia Senatoria.

Datum sub manibus nostris ante diem IV Kal. IANVARIAS MMDCCLVIII

Given under our hands the 29th day of December, 2005 CE, 2758 a.u.c.

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus

Censores, Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41015 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: a.d. IV Kal. Ian.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem IV Kalendas Ianuarius; haec dies comitialis est.


"At that time the Trojans who had fled with Aeneas from Troy after its
capture landed at Laurentum, which is on the coast of the Aborigines
facing the Tyrrhenian sea, not far from the mouth of the Tiber. And
having received from the Aborigines some land for their habitation and
everything else they desired, they built a town on a hill not far from
the sea and called it Lavinium. Soon after this they changed their
ancient name and, together with the Aborigines, were called Latins,
after the king of that country. And leaving Lavinium, they joined with
the inhabitants of those parts in building a larger city, surrounded
by a wall, which they called Alba; and setting out thence, they built
many other cities, the cities of the so‑called Prisci Latini, of which
the greatest part were inhabited even to my day. Then, sixteen
generations after the taking of Troy, sending out a colony to
Pallantium and Saturnia, where the Peloponnesians and the Arcadians
had made their first settlement and where there were still left some
remains of the ancient race, they settled these places and surrounded
Pallantium with a wall, so that it then first received the form of a
city. This settlement they called Rome, after Romulus, who was the
leader of the colony and the seventeenth in descent from Aeneas. But
also concerning the arrival of Aeneas in Italy, since some historians
have been ignorant of it and others have related it in a different
manner, I wish to give more than a cursory account, having compared
the histories of those writers, both Greek and Roman, who are the best
accredited. The stories concerning him are as follows:

When Troy had been taken by the Achaeans, either by the stratagem of
the wooden horse, as Homer represents, or by the treachery of the
Antenoridae, or by some other means, the greatest part of the Trojans
and of their allies then in the city were surprised and slain in their
beds; for it seems that this calamity came upon them in the night,
when they were not upon their guard. But Aeneas and his Trojan forces
which he had brought from the cities of Dardanus and Ophrynium to the
assistance of the people of Ilium, and as many others as had early
notice of the calamity, while the Greeks were taking the lower town,
fled together to the stronghold of Pergamus, occupied the citadel,
which was fortified with its own wall; here were deposited the holy
things of the Trojans inherited from their fathers and their great
wealth in valuables, as was to be expected in a stronghold, and here
also the flower of their army was stationed. Here they awaited and
repulsed the enemy who were endeavouring to gain a foothold on the
acropolis, and by making secret sallies they were able, through their
familiarity with the narrow streets, to rescue the multitude which was
seeking to escape at the taking of the city; and thus a larger number
escaped than were taken prisoner. But with respect to the future he
reasoned very properly that it would be impossible to save a city the
greater part of which was already in possession of the enemy, and he
therefore decided to abandon the wall, bare of defenders, to the enemy
and to save the inhabitants themselves as well as the holy objects
inherited from their fathers and all the valuables he could carry
away. Having thus resolved, he first sent out from the city the women
and children together with the aged and all others whose condition
required much time to make their escape, with orders to take the roads
leading to Mount Ida, while the Achaeans, intent on capturing the
citadel, were giving no thought to the pursuit of the multitude who
were escaping from the city. Of the army, he assigned one part to
escort the inhabitants who were departing, in order that their flight
might be as safe and free from hardships as the circumstances would
permit; and they were ordered to take possession of the strongest
parts of Mount Ida. With the rest of the troops, who were the most
valiant, he remained upon the wall of the citadel and, by keeping the
enemy occupied in assaulting it, he rendered less difficult the flight
of those who had gone on ahead. But when Neoptolemus and his men
gained a foothold on part of the acropolis and all the Achaeans
rallied to their support, Aeneas abandoned the place; and opening the
gates, he marched away with the rest of the fugitives in good order,
carrying with him in the best chariots his father and the gods of his
country, together with his wife and children and whatever else, either
person or thing, was most precious." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus,
"Roman Antiquitiues", 1.45-46

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41016 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: Re: EDICTVM CENSORIVM DE SENATU
That seems a bit much, Marine.
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <gawne@...>
wrote:
> EDICTVM CENSORIVM
>
> While the results of the December elections have not
yet been published,
> the Lex Popillia Senatoria was not contested and
will likely pass. One
> of the requirements of the Lex Popillia Senatoria is
for the Censors to
> establish the maximum possible size of the Senate
after each Census.
>
> The Lex Popillia Senatoria requires that the maximum
size of the Senate
> be set at 15% of the tax paying (assidui)
population. Our recently
> concluded census established that we have 238
assidui. Therefore the
> maximum size of the Senate until the conclusion of
the next census shall
> be 36 Senators.
>
> Hoc edictum ilico valet.
>
> This edict takes effect immediately.
>
> Datum sub manibus nostris ante diem V Kal. IANVARIAS
MMDCCLVIII
>
> Given under our hands the 28th day of December, 2005
CE, 2758 a.u.c.
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
> Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
>
> Censores, Novae Romae
>


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41017 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: The Senate is in Session
M. Hortensia Maior Quiritibus spd;

The Senate is in session and voting on a variety of issues:
the coin project, replacing governors, sodalitas Latinitas.
We will post the results of the voting as soon as possible.

valete
Marca Hortensia Maior TRP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41018 From: rory kirshner Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: Re: Fwd: Senatus Consultum - Report
M.Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
here is the voting results of the Senate


--- In SenatusRomanus@yahoogroups.com, "FAC" wrote:

Salvete Illustri Senatores,

the last Senatus Consultum of the year 2006 is officially closed.
Firstly I would use this way to thank all the Senatores and my
colleague Consul Laenas for their help during my consulship.

I would invite you to check with me the results of the meeting
looking about your own votes and comments.

At the end, 20 Senatores voted satisfying the requirements for a
quorum. I congratulate and thank you for the high partecipation.
The following are the Senatores which have voted:

FAC - Franciscus Apulus Caesar
GSA - Gnaeus Salvius Astur
CFBQ - Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
MIP - Marcus lulius Perusianus
GEM - Gn. Equitius Marinus
GPL - Gaius Popillius Laenas
MOG - Marcus Octavius Germanicus
ECF - Emilia Curia Finnica
QFM - Q. Fabius Maximus
PC - Patricia Cassia
PMTS - Pompeia Minucia Tiberia Strabo
MAM - Marcus Arminius Maior
TLF - Titus Labienus Fortunatus
LECA - L Equitius Cincinnatus Augur
LSA - Lucius Sergius Australicus
CFD - Caius Flavius Diocletianus
GMM - Gaius Marius Merullus
MMTA - Marcus Minucius Tiberius Audens
ATC - Appius Tullius Cato
MCS - Manius Constantinus Serapio


The results are the following.



# 1 - PROPOSAL FOR A NEW SESTERTIUS
The Senatus is called to approve the following proposal by
the "NRCoins" group (which includes M. Lucretius Agricola, C.
Equitius Cato, C. Vipsanius Agrippa, D. Claudius Aquilius
Germanicus, Apollonius Cordus, and others) [...]

PASSED (19 uti rogas; 0 abtisneo; 1 antiquo)

FAC - VTI ROGAS
GSA - VTI ROGAS
CFBQ - VTI ROGAS: The proposal seems good, especially as the Res
Publica don't have to
invest any money.
MIP - VTI ROGAS
GEM - VTI ROGAS
GPL - VTI ROGAS
MOG - VTI ROGAS
ECF - VTI ROGAS
QFM - ANTIQVO: I am worried that these guys are going to get in over
their head and ask the Senate to bail them out. That would mean
that our treasury would be put at risk. If we are going to coin
money either I would prefer that NR funds it, or a single privius
with enough money to cover all the costs, be put in charge.
Multiple Subscriptions are excellent in theory, but until the money
is completely raised and banked, with proof of its existence, I
believe this vote is premature. I realize my one token vote of
protest means nothing, but I hope that the Conscript Fathers take
notice of my views and consider them in the future.
PC - VTI ROGAS
PMTS - VTI ROGAS
MAM - VTI ROGAS
TLF - VTI ROGAS
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA - VTI ROGAS
CFD - VTI ROGAS
GMM - VTI ROGAS
MMTA - VTI ROGAS
ATC - VTI ROGAS
MCS - VTI ROGAS



#2 - REGVLA SODALITATIS LATINITATIS
The Senatus is called to approve the charter of the Sodalitas
Latinitas [...]

PASSED (20 uti rogas; 0 abtisneo; 0 antiquo)

FAC - VTI ROGAS
GSA - VTI ROGAS: Spero ut Sodalitas Latinitatis possit nova regula
crescere et ad bonam
frugem se recipere.
CFBQ - VTI ROGAS: It seems reasonable to me.
MIP - VTI ROGAS
GEM - VTI ROGAS
GPL - VTI ROGAS
MOG - VTI ROGAS
ECF - VTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS: Although we already approved the Sodalitatis.
PC - VTI ROGAS
PMTS - VTI ROGAS
MAM - VTI ROGAS
TLF - VTI ROGAS
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA - VTI ROGAS
CFD - VTI ROGAS
GMM - VTI ROGAS: Spero hanc regulam novam dare sodalitati incipium
novum I hope that by
passing this revised charter we are helping the new leadership of
this
sodalitas get off to a fresh start with it
MMTA - VTI ROGAS
ATC - VTI ROGAS
MCS - VTI ROGAS



# 3 - APPOINTMENT OF NEW PROPRAETOR PROVINCIAE ITALIAE
Franciscus Apulus Caesar is appointed new Propraetor of Provincia
Italia.

PASSED (12 uti rogas; 3 abtisneo; 5 antiquo)

FAC - ABSTINEO
GSA - VTI ROGAS: Col mio ringraziamento per Serapio ed auguri per il
nuovo propraetor.
CFBQ - VTI ROGAS: Italia will be in good hands with Franciscus
Apulus Caesar, but we
must not forget to gtive great thanks to former Propraetor Manius
Constantinus Serapio, may he prosper and be well!
MIP - VTI ROGAS: With my best appreciation for the job done by the
former
Prapraetor, Illustris M' Const. Serapio and deep trust in the new,
hopefully, appointed one.
GEM - VTI ROGAS
GPL - ABSTINEO
MOG - ANTIQVO: What ever happened to the idea of the Senate choosing
propraetores?
Traditionally, we would announce an opening, receive applications,
then choose from those
applications. Now, we're only asked to rubber-stamp whatever the
previous
propraetor wants.
Although Consul Apulus did a fine job during his previous term as
propraetor,
I vote NO on this item solely on its procedural irregularity; and I
will vote
NO on every future appointment, excepting continuation of thsoe
currently
in that office, where there has been no open call for candidates.
ECF - VTI ROGAS
QFM - ANTIQVO: The Senate renews Provincial Praetorships in IAN.
Why are we voting on this now? The current Praetor said he would
remain in office until the new one was appointed. For an
organization that runs by laws, we certainly ignore many of them.
PC - VTI ROGAS: It is fitting that this Provincia should be one of
our most
active and valued, and both the incoming and outgoing Praetores are
credits to Nova Roma.
PMTS - VTI ROGAS: His previous successes as a former Propraetor
speak for themselves, in my view.
MAM - VTI ROGAS
TLF - VTI ROGAS
LECA - ANTIQVO: I also ask that other candidates to be sought, and
presented as well.
LSA - ABSTINEO
CFD - ANTIQVO: I follow the objections presented here by Senators
Lucius
Equitius Cincinnatus and Quintus Fabius Maximus.
GMM - VTI ROGAS
MMTA - VTI ROGAS
ATC - ANTIQVO: For reasons already outlined by a some honorable
fellow members of this house.
MCS - VTI ROGAS: I wish the new governor all the best. Thank you to
my
provincial staff for their dedication.




#4 - PRELIMINARY BUDGET FOR 2759
The Senate approves the preliminary budget for 2759 auc as presented
by Consul Laenas at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SenatusRomanus/files/Finance/2005Budget
_to_actual.xls

PASSED (17 uti rogas; 0 abtisneo; 3 antiquo)

FAC - VTI ROGAS
GSA - VTI ROGAS
CFBQ - VTI ROGAS: The Scholarship Fund has never been used. Should
we really continue
to put more money there? I would like to see some funds to be
allocated to local groups and recruitment, in short to make NR grow
instead. I hope to see such changes in the ordinary budget in the
beginning of the next year.
MIP - VTI ROGAS
GEM - VTI ROGAS
GPL - VTI ROGAS
MOG - ABSTINEO
ECF - VTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS
PC - VTI ROGAS: I also wish to address the point raised by Caeso
Fabius. It was the
original intention of the creators of the scholarship fund that it be
added to annually over time and allowed to reach a level at which it
produced a substantial amount of interest income which could be
donated to scholarly causes. This may or may not be the path the
current administration wishes to take with it, but I would argue that
sponsoring Roman scholarship is a highly worthwhile activity for Nova
Roma and that we ought to continue to devote a portion of our
resources toward such a goal.
PMTS - VTI ROGAS
MAM - VTI ROGAS
TLF - VTI ROGAS
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA - VTI ROGAS
CFD - VTI ROGAS
GMM - ABSTINEO: I cannot view the budget file and thus my abstention.
MMTA - VTI ROGAS
ATC - VTI ROGAS
MCS - ABSTINEO


valete
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Senior Consul

--- End forwarded message ---








---------------------------------
Yahoo! Shopping
Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41019 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: Re: Fwd: Senatus Consultum - Report
A. Apollonius M. Hortensiae omnibusque sal.

Thank you for your report.




___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41020 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
A. Apollonius A. Tulliae M. Arminio Cn. Equitio
omnibus sal.

A. Tullia, you're right, it was the kalends of March
and not the ides - my brain isn't working at full
speed at the moment, I confess! And yes, M. Arminius,
it would be nice to restore the tribunician elections
to the 10th of December as well.

Cn. Equiti, you say:

> I don't favor the idea of moving the inauguration of
> new magistrates
> back to the Kalends of March. It is not in keeping
> with the practices
> of the late Republic, and it would mean that some
> magistrates would
> serve terms of 15 months.

Well, indeed, it's not in keeping with the practices
of the late republic... because it's a practice of the
middle republic. That something was done in the middle
republic but not in the late republic is not
inherently a flaw - in fact it is often a virtue.

As for the practicality of the change-over, actually I
would suggest that we should have an unusually short
year - from January to March - rather than an
unusually long one. Indeed if need be we could simply
have the senate appoint interreges for two months.

> A better way of dealing with the problem of the vote
> counting would be
> to conduct our annual elections at the same time the
> Romans of antiquity
> conducted theirs, in late summer or fall. Or if
> that seems like too
> much time to allow, then at least conduct the
> elections during November,
> when we have a long run of dies comitialis. The
> last half of September,
> and the last half of October also deserve
> consideration. Both have nice
> long intervals of consecutive dies comitiales.

Doesn't this really just amount to saying "don't do
things at the last minute?" Good advice, certainly,
but hard to ensure that it's taken. More reliable, I'd
have thought, to move the last minute to somewhere
safer. But it's not a big deal - just an idea that's
worth airing from time to time just in case it ever
catches the public imagination.



___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Exclusive Xmas Game, help Santa with his celebrity party - http://santas-christmas-party.yahoo.net/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41021 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
M. Hortensia A. Apollonio spd;
please let's do this. It's historical, it's Roman - it is
practical!
Marca Hortensia Maior
>
> A. Tullia, you're right, it was the kalends of March
> and not the ides - my brain isn't working at full
> speed at the moment, I confess! And yes, M. Arminius,
> it would be nice to restore the tribunician elections
> to the 10th of December as well.
>
> Cn. Equiti, you say:
>
> > I don't favor the idea of moving the inauguration of
> > new magistrates
> > back to the Kalends of March. It is not in keeping
> > with the practices
> > of the late Republic, and it would mean that some
> > magistrates would
> > serve terms of 15 months.
>
> Well, indeed, it's not in keeping with the practices
> of the late republic... because it's a practice of the
> middle republic. That something was done in the middle
> republic but not in the late republic is not
> inherently a flaw - in fact it is often a virtue.
>
> As for the practicality of the change-over, actually I
> would suggest that we should have an unusually short
> year - from January to March - rather than an
> unusually long one. Indeed if need be we could simply
> have the senate appoint interreges for two months.
>
> > A better way of dealing with the problem of the vote
> > counting would be
> > to conduct our annual elections at the same time the
> > Romans of antiquity
> > conducted theirs, in late summer or fall. Or if
> > that seems like too
> > much time to allow, then at least conduct the
> > elections during November,
> > when we have a long run of dies comitialis. The
> > last half of September,
> > and the last half of October also deserve
> > consideration. Both have nice
> > long intervals of consecutive dies comitiales.
>
> Doesn't this really just amount to saying "don't do
> things at the last minute?" Good advice, certainly,
> but hard to ensure that it's taken. More reliable, I'd
> have thought, to move the last minute to somewhere
> safer. But it's not a big deal - just an idea that's
> worth airing from time to time just in case it ever
> catches the public imagination.
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Exclusive Xmas Game, help Santa with his celebrity party -
http://santas-christmas-party.yahoo.net/
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41022 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
M. Lucretius Agricola M. Hortenisae A. Apollonio Omnibusque S.P.D.

Even if it were not historical (in terms of date), this proposal still
carries with it great sensitivity to important issues and offers great
advantage to the Res Publica in the long run. Let us not be put off by
terms of office being a bit longer or a bit shorter as that would
happen only once. We would enjoy the benefits of a more convenient
schedule every year thereafter.

I'm sure we could continue on as we have done, so this is not an
essential change. Still, the possibility of seeing things run more
smoothly during a less hectic time of year catches the imagination of
this citizen.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia A. Apollonio spd;
> please let's do this. It's historical, it's Roman - it is
> practical!
> Marca Hortensia Maior
> >
> > A. Tullia, you're right, it was the kalends of March
> > and not the ides - my brain isn't working at full
> > speed at the moment, I confess! And yes, M. Arminius,
> > it would be nice to restore the tribunician elections
> > to the 10th of December as well.
> >
> > Cn. Equiti, you say:
> >
> > > I don't favor the idea of moving the inauguration of
> > > new magistrates
> > > back to the Kalends of March. It is not in keeping
> > > with the practices
> > > of the late Republic, and it would mean that some
> > > magistrates would
> > > serve terms of 15 months.
> >
> > Well, indeed, it's not in keeping with the practices
> > of the late republic... because it's a practice of the
> > middle republic. That something was done in the middle
> > republic but not in the late republic is not
> > inherently a flaw - in fact it is often a virtue.
> >
> > As for the practicality of the change-over, actually I
> > would suggest that we should have an unusually short
> > year - from January to March - rather than an
> > unusually long one. Indeed if need be we could simply
> > have the senate appoint interreges for two months.
> >
> > > A better way of dealing with the problem of the vote
> > > counting would be
> > > to conduct our annual elections at the same time the
> > > Romans of antiquity
> > > conducted theirs, in late summer or fall. Or if
> > > that seems like too
> > > much time to allow, then at least conduct the
> > > elections during November,
> > > when we have a long run of dies comitialis. The
> > > last half of September,
> > > and the last half of October also deserve
> > > consideration. Both have nice
> > > long intervals of consecutive dies comitiales.
> >
> > Doesn't this really just amount to saying "don't do
> > things at the last minute?" Good advice, certainly,
> > but hard to ensure that it's taken. More reliable, I'd
> > have thought, to move the last minute to somewhere
> > safer. But it's not a big deal - just an idea that's
> > worth airing from time to time just in case it ever
> > catches the public imagination.
> >
> >
> >
> > ___________________________________________________________
> > Yahoo! Exclusive Xmas Game, help Santa with his celebrity party -
> http://santas-christmas-party.yahoo.net/
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41023 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: Re: Fwd: Senatus Consultum - Report
A. Tullia Scholastica M. Hortensiae Maiori quiritibusque omnibus S.P.D.

Plurimas gratias. I am very gratified to see that the new charter of the
Sodalitas Latinitatis was not only approved, but unanimously approved, by
those members of the Senate who attended this session. We worked hard to
get a document which was appropriate and acceptable, but lacked the flaws of
its predecessor. The original charter had been written before there was a
Sodalitas Egressus, before there was an Academia Thules, and before either
the Sodalitas or NR was anything close to the size they now are, and was no
longer suitable for the purposes of the sodalitas or Nova Roma.

The Sodalitas Latinitatis is flourishing, with nearly 300 members, many
of whom post in Latin‹and in good Latin, too. A few months ago, I welcomed
our 275th member; now we have added nearly another 25, despite departures.
What we lack at present, however, and have lacked for at least two years, is
a governing structure, for the last officer elected under the original
charter, the list moderator, resigned long ago, and there had been no
elections since February of 2001. I have served as primary list moderator
approximately since late August 2004, and effectively have been the only
officer, appointed by the list owner. Avitus and I have brought this group
to life with the help of the many active sodales, and it is good to see it
doing so well‹but we needed a workable governing structure, and a way of
offering our services to the Res Publica, which we hope we can accomplish by
the system we have devised in the charter. After the holidays, when I
expect more of the sodales to be present, we shall start implementing the
charter provisions, and working on the bylaws necessary for this.

I would also like to thank the Senate for their confidence in us, and in
the work of the Sodalitas Latinitatis Charter Revision Commission.

Vale, et ualete,

A. Tullia Scholastica
Moderatrix Sodalitatis Latinitatis

>
> M.Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
> here is the voting results of the Senate
>
>
> --- In SenatusRomanus@yahoogroups.com, "FAC" wrote:
>
> Salvete Illustri Senatores,
>
> the last Senatus Consultum of the year 2006 is officially closed.
> Firstly I would use this way to thank all the Senatores and my
> colleague Consul Laenas for their help during my consulship.
>
> I would invite you to check with me the results of the meeting
> looking about your own votes and comments.
>
> At the end, 20 Senatores voted satisfying the requirements for a
> quorum. I congratulate and thank you for the high partecipation.
> The following are the Senatores which have voted:
>
> FAC - Franciscus Apulus Caesar
> GSA - Gnaeus Salvius Astur
> CFBQ - Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
> MIP - Marcus lulius Perusianus
> GEM - Gn. Equitius Marinus
> GPL - Gaius Popillius Laenas
> MOG - Marcus Octavius Germanicus
> ECF - Emilia Curia Finnica
> QFM - Q. Fabius Maximus
> PC - Patricia Cassia
> PMTS - Pompeia Minucia Tiberia Strabo
> MAM - Marcus Arminius Maior
> TLF - Titus Labienus Fortunatus
> LECA - L Equitius Cincinnatus Augur
> LSA - Lucius Sergius Australicus
> CFD - Caius Flavius Diocletianus
> GMM - Gaius Marius Merullus
> MMTA - Marcus Minucius Tiberius Audens
> ATC - Appius Tullius Cato
> MCS - Manius Constantinus Serapio
>
>
> The results are the following.
>
>
>
> # 1 - PROPOSAL FOR A NEW SESTERTIUS
> The Senatus is called to approve the following proposal by
> the "NRCoins" group (which includes M. Lucretius Agricola, C.
> Equitius Cato, C. Vipsanius Agrippa, D. Claudius Aquilius
> Germanicus, Apollonius Cordus, and others) [...]
>
> PASSED (19 uti rogas; 0 abtisneo; 1 antiquo)
>
> FAC - VTI ROGAS
> GSA - VTI ROGAS
> CFBQ - VTI ROGAS: The proposal seems good, especially as the Res
> Publica don't have to
> invest any money.
> MIP - VTI ROGAS
> GEM - VTI ROGAS
> GPL - VTI ROGAS
> MOG - VTI ROGAS
> ECF - VTI ROGAS
> QFM - ANTIQVO: I am worried that these guys are going to get in over
> their head and ask the Senate to bail them out. That would mean
> that our treasury would be put at risk. If we are going to coin
> money either I would prefer that NR funds it, or a single privius
> with enough money to cover all the costs, be put in charge.
> Multiple Subscriptions are excellent in theory, but until the money
> is completely raised and banked, with proof of its existence, I
> believe this vote is premature. I realize my one token vote of
> protest means nothing, but I hope that the Conscript Fathers take
> notice of my views and consider them in the future.
> PC - VTI ROGAS
> PMTS - VTI ROGAS
> MAM - VTI ROGAS
> TLF - VTI ROGAS
> LECA - VTI ROGAS
> LSA - VTI ROGAS
> CFD - VTI ROGAS
> GMM - VTI ROGAS
> MMTA - VTI ROGAS
> ATC - VTI ROGAS
> MCS - VTI ROGAS
>
>
>
> #2 - REGVLA SODALITATIS LATINITATIS
> The Senatus is called to approve the charter of the Sodalitas
> Latinitas [...]
>
> PASSED (20 uti rogas; 0 abtisneo; 0 antiquo)
>
> FAC - VTI ROGAS
> GSA - VTI ROGAS: Spero ut Sodalitas Latinitatis possit nova regula
> crescere et ad bonam
> frugem se recipere.
> CFBQ - VTI ROGAS: It seems reasonable to me.
> MIP - VTI ROGAS
> GEM - VTI ROGAS
> GPL - VTI ROGAS
> MOG - VTI ROGAS
> ECF - VTI ROGAS
> QFM - VTI ROGAS: Although we already approved the Sodalitatis.
> PC - VTI ROGAS
> PMTS - VTI ROGAS
> MAM - VTI ROGAS
> TLF - VTI ROGAS
> LECA - VTI ROGAS
> LSA - VTI ROGAS
> CFD - VTI ROGAS
> GMM - VTI ROGAS: Spero hanc regulam novam dare sodalitati incipium
> novum I hope that by
> passing this revised charter we are helping the new leadership of
> this
> sodalitas get off to a fresh start with it
> MMTA - VTI ROGAS
> ATC - VTI ROGAS
> MCS - VTI ROGAS
>
>
>
> # 3 - APPOINTMENT OF NEW PROPRAETOR PROVINCIAE ITALIAE
> Franciscus Apulus Caesar is appointed new Propraetor of Provincia
> Italia.
>
> PASSED (12 uti rogas; 3 abtisneo; 5 antiquo)
>
> FAC - ABSTINEO
> GSA - VTI ROGAS: Col mio ringraziamento per Serapio ed auguri per il
> nuovo propraetor.
> CFBQ - VTI ROGAS: Italia will be in good hands with Franciscus
> Apulus Caesar, but we
> must not forget to gtive great thanks to former Propraetor Manius
> Constantinus Serapio, may he prosper and be well!
> MIP - VTI ROGAS: With my best appreciation for the job done by the
> former
> Prapraetor, Illustris M' Const. Serapio and deep trust in the new,
> hopefully, appointed one.
> GEM - VTI ROGAS
> GPL - ABSTINEO
> MOG - ANTIQVO: What ever happened to the idea of the Senate choosing
> propraetores?
> Traditionally, we would announce an opening, receive applications,
> then choose from those
> applications. Now, we're only asked to rubber-stamp whatever the
> previous
> propraetor wants.
> Although Consul Apulus did a fine job during his previous term as
> propraetor,
> I vote NO on this item solely on its procedural irregularity; and I
> will vote
> NO on every future appointment, excepting continuation of thsoe
> currently
> in that office, where there has been no open call for candidates.
> ECF - VTI ROGAS
> QFM - ANTIQVO: The Senate renews Provincial Praetorships in IAN.
> Why are we voting on this now? The current Praetor said he would
> remain in office until the new one was appointed. For an
> organization that runs by laws, we certainly ignore many of them.
> PC - VTI ROGAS: It is fitting that this Provincia should be one of
> our most
> active and valued, and both the incoming and outgoing Praetores are
> credits to Nova Roma.
> PMTS - VTI ROGAS: His previous successes as a former Propraetor
> speak for themselves, in my view.
> MAM - VTI ROGAS
> TLF - VTI ROGAS
> LECA - ANTIQVO: I also ask that other candidates to be sought, and
> presented as well.
> LSA - ABSTINEO
> CFD - ANTIQVO: I follow the objections presented here by Senators
> Lucius
> Equitius Cincinnatus and Quintus Fabius Maximus.
> GMM - VTI ROGAS
> MMTA - VTI ROGAS
> ATC - ANTIQVO: For reasons already outlined by a some honorable
> fellow members of this house.
> MCS - VTI ROGAS: I wish the new governor all the best. Thank you to
> my
> provincial staff for their dedication.
>
>
>
>
> #4 - PRELIMINARY BUDGET FOR 2759
> The Senate approves the preliminary budget for 2759 auc as presented
> by Consul Laenas at
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SenatusRomanus/files/Finance/2005Budget
> _to_actual.xls
>
> PASSED (17 uti rogas; 0 abtisneo; 3 antiquo)
>
> FAC - VTI ROGAS
> GSA - VTI ROGAS
> CFBQ - VTI ROGAS: The Scholarship Fund has never been used. Should
> we really continue
> to put more money there? I would like to see some funds to be
> allocated to local groups and recruitment, in short to make NR grow
> instead. I hope to see such changes in the ordinary budget in the
> beginning of the next year.
> MIP - VTI ROGAS
> GEM - VTI ROGAS
> GPL - VTI ROGAS
> MOG - ABSTINEO
> ECF - VTI ROGAS
> QFM - VTI ROGAS
> PC - VTI ROGAS: I also wish to address the point raised by Caeso
> Fabius. It was the
> original intention of the creators of the scholarship fund that it be
> added to annually over time and allowed to reach a level at which it
> produced a substantial amount of interest income which could be
> donated to scholarly causes. This may or may not be the path the
> current administration wishes to take with it, but I would argue that
> sponsoring Roman scholarship is a highly worthwhile activity for Nova
> Roma and that we ought to continue to devote a portion of our
> resources toward such a goal.
> PMTS - VTI ROGAS
> MAM - VTI ROGAS
> TLF - VTI ROGAS
> LECA - VTI ROGAS
> LSA - VTI ROGAS
> CFD - VTI ROGAS
> GMM - ABSTINEO: I cannot view the budget file and thus my abstention.
> MMTA - VTI ROGAS
> ATC - VTI ROGAS
> MCS - ABSTINEO
>
>
> valete
> Fr. Apulus Caesar
> Senior Consul
>
> --- End forwarded message ---
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41024 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-12-29
Subject: Re: Fwd: Senatus Consultum - Report
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, rory kirshner <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> M.Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
> here is the voting results of the Senate
>


[SNIP]


>
>
> # 1 - PROPOSAL FOR A NEW SESTERTIUS
> The Senatus is called to approve the following proposal by
> the "NRCoins" group (which includes M. Lucretius Agricola, C.
> Equitius Cato, C. Vipsanius Agrippa, D. Claudius Aquilius
> Germanicus, Apollonius Cordus, and others) [...]
>
> PASSED (19 uti rogas; 0 abtisneo; 1 antiquo)
>
> FAC - VTI ROGAS
> GSA - VTI ROGAS
> CFBQ - VTI ROGAS: The proposal seems good, especially as the Res
> Publica don't have to
> invest any money.
> MIP - VTI ROGAS
> GEM - VTI ROGAS
> GPL - VTI ROGAS
> MOG - VTI ROGAS
> ECF - VTI ROGAS
> QFM - ANTIQVO: I am worried that these guys are going to get in over
> their head and ask the Senate to bail them out. That would mean
> that our treasury would be put at risk. If we are going to coin
> money either I would prefer that NR funds it, or a single privius
> with enough money to cover all the costs, be put in charge.
> Multiple Subscriptions are excellent in theory, but until the money
> is completely raised and banked, with proof of its existence, I
> believe this vote is premature. I realize my one token vote of
> protest means nothing, but I hope that the Conscript Fathers take
> notice of my views and consider them in the future.
> PC - VTI ROGAS
> PMTS - VTI ROGAS
> MAM - VTI ROGAS
> TLF - VTI ROGAS
> LECA - VTI ROGAS
> LSA - VTI ROGAS
> CFD - VTI ROGAS
> GMM - VTI ROGAS
> MMTA - VTI ROGAS
> ATC - VTI ROGAS
> MCS - VTI ROGAS
>
>

M. Lucretius Agricola Q. Fabio Maximo Omnibusque S.P.D.

The Senator raises some important points which I think I may be in a
position to address.

Some months ago, mine was one of the voices raised loudest in support
for this project, so when doubts were cast here about it I felt it
best to withdraw from the project. In doing so I hoped to illustrate
that at least there was no intent to use this project as a scheme to
defraud citizens. So I speak here now as one who has insider knowledge
of the project but who now speaks from the outside.

As a first point, I want to repeat that everything that was done was
done in the open and records of communication, estimates and so forth
are available to members of the NRCoins group.

As a second point, a matter of diclosure, I am still an investor in
the project. That is, the project holds money from me towards funding
the first coin. Speaking for myself I can say that I understand the
risk involved in this sort of thing. I hope to be paid back, in part
in sestertii and in part in US dollars. Since I used discretionary
funds I am willing to wait quite a while for this to happen, if it
happens at all. Since I am no longer a member of the group I hope that
thoughtful citizens will see that I put my faith completely in the
group, not only to act properly but to do so under the auspices of the
Senate.

Third, I can say, only to the extent that one person's mind is
knowable by any other, that everyone who has contributed money can at
least say the same thing. To my knowledge no contributor has "put up
the rent money" and all have taken on the risk willingly.

My fourth point is this, that quite a respectable sum has already been
collected and is in safe hands. The Senate could have and indeed can
at any time choose to participate in the funding or not. It is
certainly true that the Treasury stands to benefit, but no member of
the group has ever expressed to me the notion that the Senate, even
after approving this project, should be seen to be under any
obligation to fund it, either in whole or in part.


It is not without historical basis that private citizens are taking
this risk, and risk it is. I hope that the Senate does not act to
prevent this sort of thing in the future. In taking risk for the Res
Publica citizens can provide honorable service to the State and they
can win praise for themselves. This is a risk that adults should, in
my view, be allowed to take. As a nearly landless State we have no
need for auqaducts or roads, but we do have other needs, and citizen
initiative should not be stifled.

Any venture entails some risk, and only a fool would deny this. The
wise, I think, balance risk with caution and lay careful plans. The
roadmap that is in hand with this project, a cautious and conservative
plan, I think, includes the possibility, given proper permission, of
seeing our Nova Roma coinage become self-funding. It was my hope in
the beginning, and I think this is still the hope of the remaining
members of the group, to be able to hand over to the Senate some time
in the future a well-run and self-funding coin program, a "mint", so
to speak. The project in hand, though, is simply to produce a single
issue of sestertius. The members of the NRCoins group have my complete
confidence that every effort will be made in all good faith to see
this through.

I thank the Senator for expressing his frank concerns and I hope that
an honorable voice of caution is always welcome in these sorts of
matters. I hope that I have helped lay some of his concerns to rest
and in doing so I hope that I have also helped the citizens at large
understand this project better.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41025 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Fwd: Senatus Consultum - Report
In a message dated 12/29/2005 8:55:15 PM Pacific Standard Time,
wm_hogue@... writes:
I thank the Senator for expressing his frank concerns and I hope that
an honorable voice of caution is always welcome in these sorts of
matters. I hope that I have helped lay some of his concerns to rest
and in doing so I hope that I have also helped the citizens at large
understand this project better.

Q. Fabius Maximus M. Lucretio Agricolus Omnibusque S.P.D.
Salve M. Lucreti
Salvete

I understand your personal commitment to the project. And I salute your
initiative.
Are the complete funds that are needed have been raised and banked? Or are
you
still waiting for the subscribers to finish the process?

Until the complete funds are raised, no movement on the project should take
place.

We have, at least to the best of knowledge, no guarantor of the project, i.e.
the one individual whose says he will cover any shortfall or unforeseen
expenses hereto not accounted for.

The earlier coin run did have that person, M. Cassius Iulianus, who did the
project separate from Nova Roma, guaranteed to pay all expenses, even those
unforeseen.

So now Marcus Lucretius are you saying that you are the guarantor of this
project? And you will isolate Nova Roam from all debts incurred by this project?
If you are I will sleep better at night.

No doubt many of you wonder Fabius is so concerned over what appears to be a
trifling matter. Ten years ago as a thank you to the crews a movie struck
1,000 tokens with the name of the film on side, the principal locations on the
other. I was against it, but the other producers convinced me it would be a
fine gesture. I wanted to give out hats.
The cost to make the dies, strike the coins out of copper etc was
astronomical!
Since my production company was the lead company on the production, the bill
came to us. My fellow producers covered some but the bulk fell on me. The
studio didn't help since
it was unauthorized and thought we got rooked!
So, I had to cover the remaining cost that the other producers didn't.

My point is this, our treasury doesn't have even the money to cover this
project if the subscription total falls short. Nor should we have to. This was
supposed to be a
private consortium, that was supposed to have the money in hand before
anything else
was done. Yet, Marcus Lucretius tells us that they are still short.
And this was why I voted no. Nova Roma cannot afford to be sued, nor can she
afford
to even allow the opportunity that she might be sued.
Hence my concern.

Valete


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41026 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: a.d. III Kal. Ian.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem III Kalendas Ianuarius; haec dies comitialis est.


"In the meantime the Achaeans had taken the city by storm, and being
intent on plunder, gave those who fled abundant opportunity of making
their escape. Aeneas and his band overtook their people while still on
the road, and being united now in one body, they seized the strongest
parts of Mount Ida. section 2Here they were joined not only by the
inhabitants of Dardanus, who, upon seeing a great and unusual fire
rising from Ilium, had in the night left their city undefended, — all
except the men with Elymus and Aegestus, who had got ready some ships
and had departed even earlier, — but also by the whole populace of
Ophrynium and by those of the other Trojan cities who clung to their
liberty; and in a very short time this force of the Trojans became a
very large one. Accordingly, the fugitives who had escaped with
Aeneas from the taking of the city and were tarrying on Mount Ida were
in hopes of returning home soon, when the enemy should have sailed
away; but the Achaeans, having reduced to slavery the people who were
left in the city and in the places near by and having demolished the
forts, were preparing to subdue those also who were in the mountains.
When, however, the Trojans sent heralds to treat for peace and begged
them not to reduce them to the necessity of making war, the Achaeans
held an assembly and made peace with them upon the following terms:
Aeneas and his people were to depart from the Troad with all the
valuables they had saved in their flight within a certain fixed time,
after first delivering up the forts to the Achaeans; and the Achaeans
were to allow them a safe-conduct by land and sea throughout all their
dominions when they departed in pursuance of these terms. Aeneas,
having accepted these conditions, which he looked upon as the best
possible in the circumstances, sent away Ascanius, his eldest son,
with some of the allies, chiefly Phrygians, to the country of
Dascylitis, as it is called, in which lies the Ascanian lake, since he
had been invited by the inhabitants to reign over them. But Ascanius
did not tarry there for any great length of time; for when Scamandrius
and the other descendants of Hector who had been permitted by
Neoptolemus to return home from Greece, came to him, he went to Troy,
in order to restore them to their ancestral kingdom. Regarding
Ascanius, then, this is all that is told. As for Aeneas, after his
fleet was ready, he embarked with the rest of his sons and his father,
taking with him the images of the gods, and crossing the Hellespont,
sailed to the nearest peninsula, which lies in front of Europe and is
called Pallene. This country was occupied by a Thracian people called
Crusaeans, who were allies of the Trojans and had assisted them during
the war with greater zeal than any of the others.

This, then, is the most credible account concerning the flight of
Aeneas and is the one which Hellanicus, among the ancient historians,
adopts in his Troica. There are different accounts given of the same
events by some others, which I look upon as less probable than this.
But let every reader judge as he thinks proper. Sophocles, the tragic
poet, in his drama Laocoon represents Aeneas, just before the taking
of the city, as removing his household to Mount Ida in obedience to
the orders of his father Anchises, who recalled the injunctions of
Aphrodite and from the omens that had lately happened in the case of
Laocoön's family conjectured the approaching destruction of the city.
His iambics, which are spoken by a messenger, are as follows:

'Now at the gates arrives the goddess' son,
Aeneas, his sire upon his shoulders borne
Aloft, while down that back by thunderbolt
Of Zeus once smit the linen mantle streams;
Surrounding them the crowd of household slaves.
There follows a multitude beyond belief
Who long to join this Phrygian colony.'

But Menecrates of Xanthus says that Aeneas betrayed the city to the
Achaeans out of hatred for Alexander and that because of this service
he was permitted by them to save his household. His account, which
begins with the funeral of Achilles, runs on this wise:

'The Achaeans were oppressed with grief and felt that the army had had
its head lopped off. However, they celebrated his funeral feast and
made war with all their might till Ilium was taken by the aid of
Aeneas, who delivered it up to them. For Aeneas, being scorned by
Alexander and excluded from his prerogatives, overthrew Priam; and
having accomplished this, he became one of the Achaeans.'

Others say that he chanced to be tarrying at that time at the station
where the Trojan ships lay; and others that he had been sent with a
force into Phrygia by Priam upon some military expedition. Some give a
more fabulous account of his departure. But let the case stand
according to each man's convictions." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus 1.47-48


In ancient Egypt, today was celebrated as the birthday of the goddess
Isis. Isis is one of the earliest and most important goddess in
ancient Egypt. She was regarded as the feminine counterpart to Osiris,
a role she probably occupied before the dawn of dynastic Egypt. No
other Egyptian deity has stood the test of time as well as Isis. Her
cult was not extinguished with the other Egyptian gods, but was
embraced by the Greeks and Romans, her worship has even lasted into
the present day.

She was revered by the Egyptian people as the great mother-goddess and
represents the maternal spirit in its most intimate form. She is often
seen suckling a young Horus. In the Osiris legend she is seen as a
dutiful wife, a grieving widow and as a protector of the dead.

As a winged goddess she may represent the wind. In the Osiris legend
there are references to Isis wailing and moaning like the wind. She is
also continually travelling up and down the land in search of her lost
husband. Upon finding Osiris' body, she takes the shape of one of the
swiftest birds, a kite. Flapping and darting above his dead body she
wails in mourning. She restores life to Osiris by flapping her wings
and filling his mouth and nose with air.

Isis was a great enchantress, the goddess of magic. Together with
Thoth, she taught mankind the secrets of medicine. She was the
embalmer and gaurdian of Osiris. She is often rendered on the foot of
coffins with long wings spread to protect the deceased.


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Isis
(http://members.aol.com/egyptart/isis.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41027 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Fwd: Senatus Consultum - Report
C. Equitius Cato Q. Fabio Maximo quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Maximus, we are all very sorry that you ended up paying for your
production company's tokens. But your story has little or nothing to
do with the current work to mint a new sestertius.

The members of the NRCoins group have never approached the Senate of
Nova Roma for funds, have never placed any obligation of any kind upon
the Senate or People of Nova Roma, nor do we intend to; there was a
hope that some of our conscript fathers might see fit to donate
private monies, but it is still a private matter, and not one which
even remotely touches the public Treasury.

Since you continue to voice concerns over issues that either do not
exist or have been fully (and repeatedly) explained already, I will
make one final statement: I made it known privately, and hitherto had
preferred that it remain private, that I will cover any shortfall
between what the group has collected and what is needed to begin the
minting of the new coin --- which at this point is only a matter of a
couple of hundreds of dollars. So, regardless of whether or not we
receive any more private donations, the coin has always been fully funded.

We have a design, we have a mint, we have the Senate's approval, and
we have the money. Soon, (the) God(s) willing, we will have a new
sestertius.

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41028 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Cn. Lentulus q. k. Hortensiae tr. pl. sal.:

>>> Hortensia M. Arminio Maiori A. Apollonio Cordoque spd;

well it sounds like an excellent idea to start the year in March & have the elections then. <<<


I wouldn't think that to begin the year in March is a very good idea. Firstly, this date of beginning was not as long adopted as it may be considered as the most traditional republican system of the calendar. I have found this in a website:

"There is a fair amount of confusion in different accounts of the Roman calendar about the beginning of the year. Sometimes it will be said that the year began on March 1 until Julius Caesar reformed the calendar. This theory was disproved by the excavation of an actual republican calendar in the 1920s, which clearly shows the year started in January. It is also sometimes said that the beginning of the year changed in 153 BCE, but in fact what happened this year was that the time when consuls took office was synchronized with the calendar year. January seems to have become the beginning of the year when the republican calendar was introduced, but there is so little information about that reform (taking place, it appears, in the 5th-century BCE) that we can say little more."

Source:
http://www.polysyllabic.com/Roman.html

It's an other question whether we have to establish the 1st of March as the date of accession to curule offices or not.

I think better if not.

Its reason is practical, because in that way we can have more common points between the today's world and the ancient Rome. Furthermore, the present system is more perspicuous when the term of the consules go with the term of the year. The beginning day of the consular office was changed in 153 BC and this tradition is left to us by the ancient fellow citizens - our ancestors had a good reason to do so: why would we have to reject this tradition and change it to an elder?

VALE, HORTENSIA TRIBUNA!


Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
QUAESTOR CANDIDATUS
www.cnlentulus.iweb.hu
-------------------------------
Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
Accensus Consulis Fr. Apuli Caesaris
Scriba Aedilis Curulis L. Iulii Sullae
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae Scholasticae Senior
Scriba Magistri Araneari C. Minuci Scaevolae Iunior
Sodalis Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Latinista, Classicus Philologus



---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41029 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Fwd: Senatus Consultum - Report
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@a... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 12/29/2005 8:55:15 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> wm_hogue@y... writes:
> I thank the Senator for expressing his frank concerns and I hope that
> an honorable voice of caution is always welcome in these sorts of
> matters. I hope that I have helped lay some of his concerns to rest
> and in doing so I hope that I have also helped the citizens at large
> understand this project better.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus M. Lucretio Agricolus Omnibusque S.P.D.
> Salve M. Lucreti
> Salvete
>
> I understand your personal commitment to the project. And I salute
your
> initiative.
> Are the complete funds that are needed have been raised and banked?
Or are
> you
> still waiting for the subscribers to finish the process?
>
>

[snip]

M. Lucretius Agricola Q. Fabio Maximo Omnibusque S.P.D.

As I have said, I am not following this project in detail anymore. I'm
sure that is more funds are needed they will be found within the
group. At any rate nothing will be dumped on the doorstep of the
Treasury, I'm sure. The citizens handling this have my complete faith.

You are correct, Senator, that minting coins can be an expensive
proposition. My work on the project included collecting quotes and
I'll give here in a nutshell what I found:




It is possible to find people to do this sort of work at nearly any
price imaginable.




To be fair, these sorts of objects, let's call them "jetons", can be
made for any number of purposes and companies are to be found to
satisfy all sorts of demands; short runs, fast turn-around, design
service provided, the list is nearly endless, and thus the price range
is amazingly wide. Scale is an especially strong factor in this field,
by which I mean that some companies are set up to produce jetons by
the tens, some by the hundreds and so on. Most places that can be
found on the internet are simply not set up to produce jetons at the
scale that we require and that yields a reasonably low per-item cost.
On the other hand, a quick Google search will yield numerous hits for
token makers that can produce low-cost "jetons" in bulk, but at low
quality.

I'll say that there are some nice companies out there who can produce
1000 jetons at excellent quality, but at a price unacceptably high for
our purposes. I couldn't find anyone whom I could consider for this
project and who would quote for a run as small as 1000. There is a
line, somewhere between 1,000 and 5,000, that effectively segments
this market.

To our great sadness we were unable to obtain the identity of the
manufacturer of the original sestertii, so a search had to be made,
starting from scratch. Of all the companies I researched, in total
about ten or fifteen (I don't recall just now exactly, but the
database is in the NRCoins group) were not excluded by website
pricelists. Of those ten to fifteen or so (located in the Americas, in
Europe and in Asia) I identified exactly two that could produce what
we wanted, at the quality that we wanted, and at an acceptable price
(under 50 US cents each).

An interesting note is that if we change the requirements of size, or
of price, or of material, for example to produce an AS, a DENARIUS, or
even an AUREUS, different companies come out ahead. That is to say,
the best places to produce a SESTERTIUS are not the best places to
produce an AS or a DENARIUS. This is, I think, a result of our
stringent requirements of high quality and low cost.

I feel I was lucky to find two companies who can do the work on the
sestertius and who can meet our quality and price requirements. I am
sure that there are others, and I hope that Nova Roma can find them,
in due course of time. Finding these two took about six months. During
that time we all heald our breath, because if we failed to find a
source we were all prepared to give up the project rather than push
ahead with the production of sestertii of excessive price or poor quality.

I hope this gives some comfort that an effort was made to survey the
field widely, and that care was taken to find producers who could keep
costs and keep quality up.

I can only speak about the past. To learn the current status of the
project interested citizens should visit the NRCoins site.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41030 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Fwd: Senatus Consultum - Report
M. Lucretius Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.

I will confirm what C. Equitius Cato below says. He communicated this
to me in private, not once, but several times. His generosity is
without flaw, as is his sense of honor and decorum.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@g...>
wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato Q. Fabio Maximo quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salve et salvete.
>

> Since you continue to voice concerns over issues that either do not
> exist or have been fully (and repeatedly) explained already, I will
> make one final statement: I made it known privately, and hitherto had
> preferred that it remain private, that I will cover any shortfall
> between what the group has collected and what is needed to begin the
> minting of the new coin --- which at this point is only a matter of a
> couple of hundreds of dollars. So, regardless of whether or not we
> receive any more private donations, the coin has always been fully
funded.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41031 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Cn. Lentulus Cn. Marino salutem:

>>> I don't favor the idea of moving the inauguration of new magistrates back to the Kalends of March. <<<

I totally agree with you, Censor!

>>> It is not in keeping with the practices of the late Republic, and it would mean that some magistrates would serve terms of 15 months. <<<

However my reasoning was a different one. It is not so important that is not in keeping with the practices of the late RP - but it was changed once by our good-republican ancestors and we have no serious reasons to modify this tradition again. And by the way, this modification would not be more useful so terribily than if we held the elections in september, october or november.

>>> A better way of dealing with the problem of the vote counting would be to conduct our annual elections at the same time the Romans of antiquity conducted theirs, in late summer or fall. Or if that seems like too
much time to allow, then at least conduct the elections during November, when we have a long run of dies comitialis. The last half of September, and the last half of October also deserve consideration. Both have nice long intervals of consecutive dies comitiales. <<<


This is also my opinion. Let us move the elections to late summer or fall, as said by Cn. Equitius. This system would give more time to the magistratus designati to prepare themselves and get ready for their offices, and would give more time to the people to get used to the new government. This was a Roman invention, to involve e.g. the consules designati into the opinion leading of the republic - because soon the elected consules will be the governing consules, and thier plans, intentions and opinion is much more important than that of any other senators.

>>> However, we should not change the day on which the new curule magistrates take office from 1 January. (When the plebeian magistrates take office is not a matter of my concern, though the historical date in mid-December is worth considering.)<<<

I fully agree with you and strongly support the restoration of the historical date for the plebeian elections.

Vale!


Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
QUAESTOR CANDIDATUS
www.cnlentulus.iweb.hu
-------------------------------
Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
Accensus Consulis Fr. Apuli Caesaris
Scriba Aedilis Curulis L. Iulii Sullae
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae Scholasticae Senior
Scriba Magistri Araneari C. Minuci Scaevolae Iunior
Sodalis Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Latinista, Classicus Philologus



---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41032 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Cn. Lentulus M. Arminio s. d.:

>>> Based in the tradition, the elections in the Comitia
Plebis can be moved to november, and the Tribunes can
take office at 10/dec. <<<

As I have written to ces. Cn. Equitius, I wholeheartedly support this idea: and I add to it that if we move the curule elections to an earlier date (to late summer or fall) we can move the plebeian elections together with them! So we can hold the two elections at the same time, what would be very practical. Of course, the date of accession to office would be different - 10th of december and 1st of january.


Vale!
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
Quaestor Candidatus
Propraetor
Accensus et Scriba


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41033 From: Marcus Iulius Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: NR Forum: one year of moderation, and an edictum
QVIRITIBVS SPD

tomorrow at midnight the current magistrates and myself will leave our offices. Hopefully you have appreciated our efforts to serve the People of Nova Roma and, in my case, I'm inclined to think that the moderation of this Forum has succeeded: I cannot say how was up to the willing of the posters and how was about the discipline of the moderators.

In any case I want to publicly thank all of you for having made this a better place of what seen in the past years and all the moderators for their constant control.

On my side, I can say that during the past 12 months I only was "obliged" to post 8 first warnings to 8 different people and never such a sender has broken the Moderation rules again. It seems to me a good result.

Up to date we don't have the names of the new Praetores but I give them my best wishes as well. At the same time I don't know if the new Lex De Foro et Moderatione has been approved by the Comitia.

If so the new Praetores will automatically have a new set of rules, on the basis of the current rules. In a few moments, I going to make my last Praetorian act and pass the text of the Law as an edict, to make these rules govern this Forum.... for a little more than 24 hours, the last ones of this year (and for the record). If the law hasn't been approved, the new Praetores will decide if keep it alive at the beginning of the new year in an edictum form, as requested by some opponents of the De Foro et moderatione text.

Thank you all once again

valete optime




M·IVL·PERVSIANVS
------------------------------
Senator et Praetor Novae Romae·Vicarius
Propraetoris Italiae·Aedilis Urbis·
-----------------------------------------
http://www.geocities.com/m_iulius
http://italia.novaroma.org/signaromanorum
http://italia.novaroma.org/nri/index.htm
------------------------------------------------
SEMPER AD LATVS·TERRAS PERMVLCES·COMITARIS VITAS

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41034 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Edictum VI of Propraetor Cn. Cornelius Lentulus about appointing Pr
EDICTVM VI PROPRAETORIS PANNONIAE

Edictum VI Propraetoris Cn. Cornelii Lentuli de Summo Sacerdote Provinciae nominando:
Edictum VI of Propraetor Cn. Cornelius Lentulus about appointment of Supreme Provincial Sacerdos:


Justification

Because Pannonia Provincia does not have other person with satisfying skills and dedication regarding the Religio Romana,
and because the practice of other provinciae is permitting that Provincial Sacerdotium and Governorship can be filled by the same person,
and because the religious development of Pannonia requires the establishment of the local priesthood:



I. - I hereby appoint myself _Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus_ as Summus Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae to fulfill the following functions:

- Special Obligations

1) To lead and supervise the religious life of Pannonia,
2) conduct public sacrificies, odbserve the religious festivities,
3) promote the Religio Romana in Pannonia.
4) All these activities have to act upon the prescriptions and authoprity of the central religious government.

- Universal Obligations

1) Regular accesibility on internet, (or, if the situation requires, by phone). For the sake of this cause, to answer the e-mails, weeklyat least.
2) In so far as the weekly accessibility cannot be warranted, to inform the citizenry of Pannonia on the Provincial Mailinglist about the date of the absence.


II.- This Edictum becomes effective the 1st of January, 2759 AUC.



Given the 30th of December, MMDCCLVIII. AUC

Datum est ante diem III Kal. Ianuarias Fr. Apulo Caesare C. Popillio Laenate consulibus


Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
PROPRAETOR PANNONIAE





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41035 From: Marcus Iulius Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Edictum Praetoricium IV - De Foro et Moderatione
Edictum Praetoricium IV - De Foro et Moderatione


The following set of rules for the NR Main List is hereby set.


I. PREMISE.


A. Topics of Discussion.
The Nova Roma Forum (herein referred to as “the main list” or “the Forum”) is currently located at: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com. The main focus of the main list is Nova Roma and ancient Rome. Nevertheless discussion about non-Roman topics are allowed in the Forum except when otherwise stated (see III. F)

B. Language Policies.
The forum in ancient Rome was a large venue, with many people of different cultures and languages conversing. Official information was in Latin, and in some cases Greek, but people were free to speak informally in the language of their choice. Our constitution mandates freedom of communication provided it is not dangerous or disruptive. On demand, the Praetores can invite or oblige the sender to make a translation in Latin or English for the benefit of the other citizens.
Exception: All official documents published on the list must follow the Lex Cornelia de Linguis Publicis (http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-02-27-ii.html) which stipulates, though comitial mandate, that any official government legislation or priestly decrees must be issued in Latin or English where applicable, so they can be translated verbatim into other languages to be more easily understood by the entirety of the populace.

C. Governance of the list
According to the Lex Octavia de Sermone (http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-06-05-i.html) the Praetors govern the list.

II. MANDATORY BEHAVIOUR IN THE NOVA ROMA FORUM.
A. Relevance of the posts
It is not advisable to issue a message lacking benefit or relevance to the rest of the Main List subscribers. A systematic use of such replies is forbidden.


B. Inappropriate behaviours.
At all times maintain politeness in the expression of oneÂ’s opinion and endeavour to respect the rights and opinions of others. Inappropriate behaviour includes:


use of words, epithets or formulas that are properly offensive or might be considered normally offensive
making another person look foolish;
name-calling;
criticising the sender in her/his character rather than her/his ideas;
making derogatory, belittling, or subjective statements about the Gods and Goddesses of Rome and her religious institutions or belittling other beliefs and religious institutions (however, quoting from a myth or historical material is allowed);
Further, in the interests of protecting our younger citizens, sexual references, including those to nudity, must be strictly within the context of an historical discussion. Otherwise, they are to be made in private.
In addition, for the same reason, references to heavy drinking, extreme violence, and the like shall also be confined to a strictly educational context, not presented as desirable behaviours.
Extensive citation from other authors without permission, or any citation from any sources without attribution. Short quotes need not require permission, but all material must be attributed to its source.
C. Public or private posts.
Always contact first the individual concerned privately, explaining the rationale for grievance and asking for clarification. In a second instance contact the Praetores directly if not able to resolve the issue privately.

D. Spamming
Due to high levels of spam and past incidents of posts from those who wish to cause disruption (usually named “trolls”), a policy of placing all new list members on Moderated Status is followed in the list. This period of moderation shall last from a minimum of one month and a maximum of two months, variable for each subscriber, according to the Praetors’ decision in view of the general frequency of his posts.

E. Advertising
Advertisement of unsolicited goods and services (a.k.a. UCE or spam) is not permitted on the main list, unless the advertiser is a member of Nova Roma's marketplace, the Macellum. Macellum merchants are welcome to advertise from time to time in a low-key fashion. Permitted forms of this include a standard email signature (four-line maximum), a one-time announcement of initial affiliation with the Macellum, advertising in response to a post of inquiry made in the forum, or an ad once per quarter advertising your presence in the Macellum.

F. Sanctions
In the case of a poster whose actions violate the guidelines mentioned in art.II in , the following course of escalation shall be followed:

a private memo from the Praetors describing the infraction, and a reminder to review the guidelines; a public notification over the mailing list that a memo has been sent to the poster for breaking the Forum rules.
a second public memo describing the infraction, and a reminder to review the guidelines, if sanction described at point 1 was already applied in the last year.
placement of the poster on moderated status (posts are still allowed but will be reviewed by the Praetors or their designate before being transmitted to the list), if sanction described at point 2 was already applied in the last year. The length of moderation shall be determined by the number of offences in the past, the severity of the violation, and the intent to violate. No citizen shall be kept in moderated status for more than two months without a firm sentence issued by a legal court as described by the Lex Salicia Poenalis: http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2003-10-08-ii.html.
III. DISCRETIONARY BEHAVIOUR IN THE FORUM.

A. Message Trimming.
Correct usage of snipping prevents large posts that can quickly fill subscribers' mailboxes. When replying to a thread, snip unnecessary sections of the original post for brevity, and indicate where done so by printing <snipped> or any other understandable mark at the appropriate place.

B. Disputes.
It is entirely appropriate to disagree publicly with another's stated views or actions, including the actions of Nova Roma's Magistrates, Senate or other appointed officials.
Observe the following when expressing disagreement of opposing viewpoints:
1. Express respect for the person and their entitlement to an opinion, as well as faith in his or her good intentions;

Point out the specific areas in which one do not agree;
Always use a specific criticism instead of a generic one;
Quote the message number of the post in which one base his account and opinions, or include sufficient context from the post to which one is replying;
C. Replies
The main list is set up so that replies are automatically sent to the entire list. Posts that merely voice agreement with a previous post without expanding on an issue in any way shall be avoided.

D. Personal information.
Do not give out any personal information (i.e., address, phone number, etc.) on the list.

E. Sources.
Provide the references of the sources when posting a text copied from any other source of information.

F. Off-topics.
As stated, off-topic messages are admitted in the forum until the Praetors declare the thread not admissible or no ore admissible.

G. Sanctions.
In the case of a poster whose actions violate the guidelines mentioned in art.III, the following course of escalation shall be followed at PraetorsÂ’ discrection.

A private memo from the Praetors describing the infraction, and a reminder to review the guidelines
A second private memo as above, if sanction described at point 1 was already applied in the last year.
A third public memo as above, if sanction described at point 2 was already applied in the last year.
The Praetores shall decide what, if any, sanctions to apply, according to their own judgement. After coming to an agreement with one another concerning the nature and level of any applicable sanctions, the Praetores shall impose such penalties fairly on all offenders, whatever their political, religious, or other leanings. The length of moderation shall be determined by the number of offences in the past, the severity of the violation, and the intent to violate. No citizen shall be kept in moderated status for more than two months without a firm sentence issued by a legal court as described by the Lex Salicia Poenalis: http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2003-10-08-ii.html.
This edictum becomes effective immediately.
DATVM·AD·III·KAL·IAN·ANN·MMDCCLVIII·AVC
FR·APULE·CAESARI·C·POPILIO·LAENAE·CONSVLIBVS

30 december 2005

M·IVL·PERVSIANVS
Praetor MMDCCLVIII AVC




---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41036 From: marcushoratius Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: de Suffragiis
Salve mi amice

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M Arminius Maior <marminius@y...>
wrote:
>
> Salve
>
>
> One more idea; the Plebeian Tribunes of ancient Rome
> were elected at 10th december.
> Based in the tradition, the elections in the Comitia
> Plebis can be moved to november, and the Tribunes can
> take office at 10/dec.
>
>
> Vale
> M.Arminius
>

The Tribuni Plebei took office on 10 Dec; their elections occurred
as early as the previous July.

I agree that the best time to hold Plebeian elections in Nova Roma
would be in the latter half of November following the Ludi Plebei.
On 10 Dec. the newly elected Tribuni Plebei could then be subscribed
to the list for Tribunes so that the current and newly elected
Tribuni Plebei might discuss matters in the interum. Then have the
newly elected Tribuni Plebei take office on 1 Jan. as it is now.

Vale optime
M Moravius Piscinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41037 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Fwd: Senatus Consultum - Report
In a message dated 12/30/2005 2:53:43 AM Pacific Standard Time,
mlcinnyc@... writes:
Since you continue to voice concerns over issues that either do not
exist or have been fully (and repeatedly) explained already, I will
make one final statement: I made it known privately, and hitherto had
preferred that it remain private, that I will cover any shortfall
between what the group has collected and what is needed to begin the
minting of the new coin --- which at this point is only a matter of a
couple of hundreds of dollars. So, regardless of whether or not we
receive any more private donations, the coin has always been fully funded.
Excellent. Nova Roma appreciates your commitment.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41038 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Election Results Need Posted
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

From what Metellus has stated the votes have been counted. Ties need
broken, and the elections need certified. This is the job of our Custos:
Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus and Gallus Minucius Iovinus. However, I
have not seen anything from either of these gentlemen to indicate they are
doing their job. Additionally, Palladius did not vote in the recent senate
vote. How many days does it take to break ties and certify votes?

What is being done to correct this problem? What are the Consuls doing? If
the Consuls are doing nothing, what are the Praetors doing?

It is clear to me that Nova Roma desperatly needs election reform.

Valete:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41039 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Salve filius et Amice!

>Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
>
>From what Metellus has stated the votes have been counted. Ties need
>broken, and the elections need certified. This is the job of our Custos:
>Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus and Gallus Minucius Iovinus. However, I
>have not seen anything from either of these gentlemen to indicate they are
>doing their job.

I know that Gallus Minucius Iovinus has been trying to break ties as
soon as there has been any ties to break. I am sure that he is happy
now that he can have it done with, If Decius Iunius Palladius
Invictus does his part, which I have no reason to doubt, Gallus
Minucius Iovinus will without any question do his part, as he is a
very loyal and hard working citizen. Never doubt that!

>Additionally, Palladius did not vote in the recent senate
>vote.

Did't Gaius Popillius Laenas Consul say something about Decius Iunius
Palladius Invictus having "personal challenges".

>How many days does it take to break ties and certify votes?

Many hours I think, but not days. The unlucky fact that our Consuls
presented two contradicting leges (about the resigning magistrates)
has surely complicated things for both the Diribitoies and Custodes.

>
>What is being done to correct this problem? What are the Consuls doing? If
>the Consuls are doing nothing, what are the Praetors doing?
>
>It is clear to me that Nova Roma desperatly needs election reform.

Why really? During Fortunatus' and my Consulship and during Marinus'
and Astur's Consulship we didn't have this problem. The elections
where held in rather good time then.

I think what is needed is:

1. Executing the elections in time and that the Consules are healthy
(not run down in car accidents) and plan well.

2. A reform I that think would help, would be to let one Custos and
two Diribitores be elected every other year. This would lead to a two
years term, but the advantage would be that half of the election
magistrates would be experienced. This is not historical, but then a
few more things are unhistorical with our elections.

The elections takes many days, citizens vote all over the world. The
election magistrates are parted by thousands of kilometers and the
list goes on. I want Nova Roma to be as historical as possible, but
in this case the task is already hopeless. We are using computers,
speaking different language and more. I think my ideas would cure it.
Some planning and experienced election magistrates. And perhaps some
added automated counting with the help of computers. ;-)

>Valete:
>
>Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFBQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41040 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: [none]
Salvete Omnes, can anyone tell me how to say struggle
and disappointment in Latin? Thanks.

S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen






__________________________________
Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41041 From: raymond fuentes Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Translation needed.
Sorry, I left out topic!
--- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<praefectus2324@...> wrote:
> Salvete Omnes, can anyone tell me how to say
struggle
> and disappointment in Latin? Thanks.
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
> http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/


S P Q R

Fidelis Ad Mortem.

Marcvs Flavivs Fides
Roman Citizen





__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41042 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Salve Modiane, et salvete quirites,

I agree that the election results should have been posted by now.
Efforts are ongoing to get this done. I am in communication with my
colleague, as he's already told you, and he is in communication with one
of the two Custodes. I am also in communication with Consul Laenas
about possible contingency measures.

Nova Roma will not cease to function on Kal Ian if the election results
have not been posted. The Senate will see to that.

> It is clear to me that Nova Roma desperatly needs election reform.

Nonsense. We need to hold elections earlier in coming years, but
otherwise our process is fundamentally sound. At the most we need to
review the vote counting process, and address any bottlenecks identified
by this year's diribitores and custodes.

Vale, et valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41043 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
G. Popillius Laenas G. Fabio Bueto Modiano salutem dicit,

Perhaps if you wish to know what the Consuls are doing you should
write to them.

I have been in touch with Pallidius. The custodes received the
results for tiebreaking starting yesterday afternoon through the
evening hours. He expects the tiebreaking to be completed tonight.

Although we expect, the results to be available for announcement
before the end of the year Roman time, I am working with several
Senators on a contingency.

Since you are running uncontested mi Modiane, please make what ever
arrangements you forsee as necessary to assume your role.

Valete.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@g...>
wrote:
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
>
> From what Metellus has stated the votes have been counted. Ties
need
> broken, and the elections need certified. This is the job of our
Custos:
> Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus and Gallus Minucius Iovinus.
However, I
> have not seen anything from either of these gentlemen to indicate
they are
> doing their job. Additionally, Palladius did not vote in the
recent senate
> vote. How many days does it take to break ties and certify votes?
>
> What is being done to correct this problem? What are the Consuls
doing? If
> the Consuls are doing nothing, what are the Praetors doing?
>
> It is clear to me that Nova Roma desperatly needs election reform.
>
> Valete:
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41044 From: Lucius Iulius Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Magna Mater website
SALVETE CIVES ROMANI!

It is my pleasure, and my honour, to do my last action as Aedilis
Curulis this year: I'm informing you about the birth of the official
Magna Mater website.
The efforts of Illustri Viri before me (my friends Quintilianus,
Apulus Caesar, Perusianus) gave me the chance of realizing this
website, that was built up by the web society Informa, as from the
informations and structure that me and my Cohors Sullana gave.

Here is the link to the website:

http://www.magnamaterproject.org/en/mm.htm

It took a lot of time to realize this website, that is still growing
up; it will be probably ultimated by next Aedilis Curulis that will
be in charge of coordinating the Magna Mater Project.

Before letting you visit our website, please listen to my last words
this year: I want to thank briefly, but sincerely, the great men of
my Cohors Sullana that worked with me this year, and mostly among
them: my optimus Quaestor L Rutilius Minervalis, Pompeia Minucia
Tiberia, T Iul Sabinus and Gn Cornelius Lentulus. Thank you, my
friends!

OPTIME VALETE
L IUL SULLA
SENIOR AEDILIS CURULIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41045 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Magna Mater website
Salve,

Wow! I've only skimmed it, but so far it's a lovely website and I've
bookmarked it for future reference. Kudos to you!

Vale,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia

http://minucia.ciarin.com


----- Original Message -----
From: "Lucius Iulius" <21aprile@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 4:36 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Magna Mater website


> SALVETE CIVES ROMANI!
>
> It is my pleasure, and my honour, to do my last action as Aedilis
> Curulis this year: I'm informing you about the birth of the official
> Magna Mater website.
> The efforts of Illustri Viri before me (my friends Quintilianus,
> Apulus Caesar, Perusianus) gave me the chance of realizing this
> website, that was built up by the web society Informa, as from the
> informations and structure that me and my Cohors Sullana gave.
>
> Here is the link to the website:
>
> http://www.magnamaterproject.org/en/mm.htm
>
> It took a lot of time to realize this website, that is still growing
> up; it will be probably ultimated by next Aedilis Curulis that will
> be in charge of coordinating the Magna Mater Project.
>
> Before letting you visit our website, please listen to my last words
> this year: I want to thank briefly, but sincerely, the great men of
> my Cohors Sullana that worked with me this year, and mostly among
> them: my optimus Quaestor L Rutilius Minervalis, Pompeia Minucia
> Tiberia, T Iul Sabinus and Gn Cornelius Lentulus. Thank you, my
> friends!
>
> OPTIME VALETE
> L IUL SULLA
> SENIOR AEDILIS CURULIS
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41046 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Salve G. Popillius Laenas Consul!

>G. Popillius Laenas G. Fabio Bueto Modiano salutem dicit,
>
>Perhaps if you wish to know what the Consuls are doing you should
>write to them.
>
>I have been in touch with Pallidius. The custodes received the
>results for tiebreaking starting yesterday afternoon through the
>evening hours. He expects the tiebreaking to be completed tonight.
>
>Although we expect, the results to be available for announcement
>before the end of the year Roman time, I am working with several
>Senators on a contingency.

You are? Interesting!

>Since you are running uncontested mi Modiane, please make what ever
>arrangements you forsee as necessary to assume your role.
>
>Valete.

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFBQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41047 From: Susan Davis Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: [none]
raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@y...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes, can anyone tell me how to say struggle
> and disappointment in Latin? Thanks.

"Nova Roma?" :-)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41048 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
---Pompeia Minucia Tiberia Gaio Popillio Laeno Consul S.P.D.


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiuspopilliuslaenas"
<gaiuspopillius@g...> wrote:
>
> G. Popillius Laenas G. Fabio Bueto Modiano salutem dicit,
>
> <snip>
>
> Although we expect, the results to be available for announcement
> before the end of the year Roman time, I am working with several
> Senators on a contingency.

Pompeia: Really? Well, in this case I think it would behoove you
to discuss this with the Senatores if you are working with several
of them on a contingency plan. Prior to ML posts, I didn't know a
thing about it, and I'm a Senator. Which Senatores are involved,
and how did you make such a determination from our august body,if I
might know?

Seeing as this contingency plan of yours potentially affects several
candidates, not all of them senatores, this might be an even better
reason to make your plans more widely known, as well as conveying
the names of those Senatores participating.
>
> Since you are running uncontested mi Modiane, please make what
ever
> arrangements you forsee as necessary to assume your role.

Pompeia: Excellent! Assuming this instruction of yours, Laenus
Consul, potentially applies to myself as well, I'll also make
arrangements.

All Modianus and myself would need to know, to lawfully assume our
roles, is whether or not we've earned the required number of
centuries for us to be considered elected as Consuls.

This determination can be made by asking for the election results
from the diribitores or webmaster...I shouldn't think the
determinations of Custos' who break ties are as critical in this
time-constricted situation.

Simply issue an edictum for such information, announce it, and
presto, problem solved!

..And the senior/junior designations, the business of the Custos,
can be delayed with little or no immediate consequence to the
republic.

Also, with respect, electoral candidates, even if there are just
two candidates for two positions, are still approved by the
people...why Modianus and myself were balloted at the cista. We are
never uncontested in that respect.
>
> Valete

>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling
<tau.athanasios@g...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
> >
> > From what Metellus has stated the votes have been counted. Ties
> need
> > broken, and the elections need certified. This is the job of
our
> Custos:
> > Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus and Gallus Minucius Iovinus.
> However, I
> > have not seen anything from either of these gentlemen to
indicate
> they are
> > doing their job. Additionally, Palladius did not vote in the
> recent senate
> > vote. How many days does it take to break ties and certify
votes?
> >
> > What is being done to correct this problem? What are the
Consuls
> doing? If
> > the Consuls are doing nothing, what are the Praetors doing?
> >
> > It is clear to me that Nova Roma desperatly needs election
reform.
> >
> > Valete:
> >
> > Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41049 From: Cant97 Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Magna Mater website
Salve!



This is very exciting! I have read about Magna Mater, and I think She is a
wonderful Goddess. Thank you and everyone else involved for making this
website available.



I know that I'm a newbie here, but I've got to say that I am very impressed
with what I see here. Election proceedings are made public, the powers that
be communicate well with the citizens, and everyone feels free to speak
their mind. Everyone seems to have a place here. I hope that eventually my
place will be as a Priestess of Hecate Trivia.



This is a hard working group of pious Romans - I'm proud to be a part of it.



Carpe Diem!



Gaia Galeria Aquila



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Lucius Iulius
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 4:37 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Magna Mater website



SALVETE CIVES ROMANI!

It is my pleasure, and my honour, to do my last action as Aedilis
Curulis this year: I'm informing you about the birth of the official
Magna Mater website.
The efforts of Illustri Viri before me (my friends Quintilianus,
Apulus Caesar, Perusianus) gave me the chance of realizing this
website, that was built up by the web society Informa, as from the
informations and structure that me and my Cohors Sullana gave.

Here is the link to the website:

http://www.magnamaterproject.org/en/mm.htm

It took a lot of time to realize this website, that is still growing
up; it will be probably ultimated by next Aedilis Curulis that will
be in charge of coordinating the Magna Mater Project.

Before letting you visit our website, please listen to my last words
this year: I want to thank briefly, but sincerely, the great men of
my Cohors Sullana that worked with me this year, and mostly among
them: my optimus Quaestor L Rutilius Minervalis, Pompeia Minucia
Tiberia, T Iul Sabinus and Gn Cornelius Lentulus. Thank you, my
friends!

OPTIME VALETE
L IUL SULLA
SENIOR AEDILIS CURULIS








SPONSORED LINKS


Ancient
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=F
all+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&
s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ> history

Fall
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+his
tory&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+em
pire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA> of the roman empire

The
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient
+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roma
n+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ> fall of the roman empire


Roman
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall
+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=1
03&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw> empire







_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41050 From: Susan Davis Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
> All Modianus and myself would need to know, to lawfully assume our
> roles, is whether or not we've earned the required number of
> centuries for us to be considered elected as Consuls.

The candidates for Consul, Praetor, and Censor should be hearing very
shortly, as there is a verified count for the Comitia Centuriata. The
Comitia Populi Tributa should also be in the hands of the Custodes
shortly.

Was there ever a final resolution to the argument over the Comitia
Plebis Tributa? Should the ballots that we have in our hands be counted?

Claudia Iulia
Diribitrix
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41051 From: Susan Davis Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Magna Mater website
"Lucius Iulius" <21aprile@e...> wrote:
>
> It is my pleasure, and my honour, to do my last action as Aedilis
> Curulis this year: I'm informing you about the birth of the
> official Magna Mater website.
>
> http://www.magnamaterproject.org/en/mm.htm

On behalf of the clergy of the modern-day Maetreum of Cybele, I'd like
to thank you and your team for the wonderful effort that you've put
forth on behalf of Magna Mater. The web site is beautiful and
informative, and we are sure that the Great Mother will look upon it
with favour.

Many congratulations and thanks!

Susan Davis
(writing as Susan Davis of the modern Gallae, rather than Claudia
Iulia of Nova Roma)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41052 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Salve Claudia Iulia,

Susan Davis wrote:

> Was there ever a final resolution to the argument over the Comitia
> Plebis Tributa? Should the ballots that we have in our hands be counted?

Forgive this Patrician for answering, but given the shortness of time
I'll allow as how the answer is Yes, the plebeian ballots should be
counted. Tribune Memmius concluded that they ought to be counted.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41053 From: Susan Davis Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
> Forgive this Patrician for answering, but given the shortness of time
> I'll allow as how the answer is Yes, the plebeian ballots should be
> counted. Tribune Memmius concluded that they ought to be counted.

My colleague has already completed a count; I'll try to expedite my
counting as soon as I've verified that we agree on the Comitia Populi
Tributa.

Claudia Iulia
Diribitrix
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41054 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
M. Hortensia Censoris Marine spd;
arg! I jolly well vetoed Memmius's edict around 2am.
Senatrix Pompeia was in the forum & Cordus and Piscinus discussed the
issue of legality and legal reasons the vote it fine over at the CPT
where it was also posted


I fervently hope that the new consuls reform the year. This is
ridiculous, even with automated balloting you still need the
magistrates, the cives, the dies Comitialis.

Those of us who don't have school; final exams, papers etc have
religious celebration & parties as well: Saturnalia, Christmas,
Hannukah! I don't want to be counting ballots or thinking about the
CPT when I am having a good time!

I would be overjoyed to have the new year of the Middle Republic
instituted in March & plebeian elections around July.
vale
Marca Hortensia TRP (2005)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41055 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
M. Hortensia Claudiae Iuliae spd;
December 27th around 2am I vetoed tribune Albucius's
veto. Unless 3 tribune overturn my veto the plebeian elections &
results will go forward. My sincere prayers to the new tribunes; I
shall burn incense for this coming year's success
bene vale in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior TRP (2005)


> Claudia Iulia
> Diribitrix
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41056 From: P. Minucia Tiberia Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: MAGNA MATER PROJECT YEAR END REPORT 2758 A.V.C.
MAGNA MATER PROJECT YEAR END REPORT 2758 A.U.C.

************


"Who is the Mother of the Gods? She is the source of the intellectual and creative Gods, who in their turn guide the Visible Gods; she is both the Mother and the Spouse of Mighty Zeus; she came into being next and together with the Great Creator; she is in control of every form of life and the course of all generations; she easily brings to perfection all things that are made; without pain she brings to birth; She is the Motherless Maiden, enthroned at the very side of Zeus, and in very truth is the Mother of All the Gods....."
................................Emperor Julian II 'The Blessed' , from an Oration to Cybele composed at Pessinus MCXVI A.V.C. (1116 years Ab Urb Condita)



***********

I. OVERVIEW

The Aedilis Curulis L. Iulius Sulla and his Cohors Sullana this year decided to pursue two aims: the final realization of a professional website dedicated to the Magna Mater Project and the organization of a fund-raising campaign.

The first step was reached: we now have the Official Magna Mater Website, that was recently presented by Aedilis Curulis L Iul Sulla; the second aim was almost but not completely reached: we created some T-shirts and polos for the Magna Mater Project, but we weren't able to begin the sales; that will be organized by the next Aedilis Curulis, hopefully in a few weeks. Anyhow, thanks to your generosity we had a large number of donations, enough to cover all the expenses we had and to save some money for the next Coordinator of the Project.

Our biggest challenge this year, now that we have the domain and website purchased for the Magna Mater project, is the research, writing and editing of website texts relative to the history of the Magna Mater mysteries, the temples, the rituals, and those personalities from antiqua who played prominent roles therein.

Contemporary archaeological research has been necessary also, and the gathering of photographs of the current ruins on the Palatine Hill in Roma, ancient statues, et al. for the website.


The relevant archaeology in Rome is the academic role of the Soprintendenza Archeologica di Roma. Last year, Marcus Iulius Perusianus Curulis Aedilis 2757, met with Prof. P. Pensabene of the University of Rome. Some mutual preliminary plans/prerequisites were established at this meeting with respect to an academic collaboration of the University with Nova Roma, this project of course being the focus of this collaboration.

For further details regarding the basics of the Magna Mater Project, please visit the Frequently Asked Questions section of this bulletin below.

Lucius Iulius Sulla Curulis Aedilis 2758 A.U.C. and his Cohors Sullana wish the best of success to the custodian of this project for 2759 A.U.C.


II. MAGNA MATER GENERAL PLAN

Listed below are the general goals being worked on to the achieve our overall objectives of the Magna Mater Project:

i. Official Website
We have purchased this and are furnishing it as discussed above.

ii. Material to Promote This Project
....leaflets
....publications
....business cards
....DVD
Although filming is completed for the DVD, we are examining the most desired distribution/marketing avenues for promotion, while being cost effective; but our website is our priority for the moment, before production of this gets underway.

iii. A 6-month scholarship for a student of the University of Rome (est. 6,000 Euros)
This goal is one we feel will make a formidable academic statement on behalf of the Magna Mater Project, and Nova Roma as a whole. It will take some years to start, anyhow.

iv. Multimedia CD ROM


There are three viable options:
a) simple CD of presentation of the Project (10-50 pictures, 5-20 text pages, 100-1000 copies)
b) generic content CD (100-200 pictures, 25-70 text pages, music and audio effects, 3-D animations, more than 1000 copies)
c) professional CD (cost would be higher than the above: pictures, some with reserved rights, 2 or 3 experts in the multimedia field)
It would be wonderful to have some more volunteers who could assist with the proposals above. Once completed, they would serve as vehicles for public education, as well as promotion of the project and Nova Roma. Many hands make light work!


III. UNIVERSITY OF ROME AND SOPRINTENDENZA COOPERATION

We shall keep you informed as to our progress in future meetings with University of Rome and Soprintendenza officials. As much of this collaboration is dependent on the establishment of our official website, efforts to develop the site have been our immediate priority in this regard. Once the website is edited, and the final graphic arrangements in place, we will be presenting our work to the University of Rome contact personnel, and begin fine tuning our future plans.


IV. FINANCIAL STATUS AND FUNDRAISING

Our Aedilician Quaestor, Lucius Rutilius Minervalis, reports as of Dec. 27 2005 a balance of $2759.25 USD 'plus' 611.89 Euros!! Our expenses to date have been $ 941.59 USD. We have been as prudent with our expenditures as possible, knowing that our future goals will entail many expenses.

A list of benefactors can be seen on our website, and Lucius Iulius Sulla Curulis Aedilis and staff wish to extend heartfelt thanks to those who have supported us financially. The Senate and Populace are indeed very generous. Without your support, such a project would remain a dream. And please remember, no donation is too small..."many small stones build great temples". We appreciate the 'huge rocks', mind you, but we can certainly use the small stones and we are very greatful.

Plans have been established for a design for T-shirt sales to assist in fundraising for this project, as previously mentioned.

Also, we piloted a fundraiser where we gave one of the donators a silver denarius from approximately 130 BCE, minted by Q. Caecilius Metellus Numidicus, Consul Roma 109 BCE.The winner of this coin was Gaius Iulius Varrus. This was sent out by myself to the recipient. Congratulations amice, and we thank you for your generosity! Thanks also to Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Censor, Gn. Equitius Marinus Censor, Q. Caecilius Metellus Pius Pontifex , and Lucia Modia Lupa Vestal who helped with the selection process


V. PROMOTION OF THE MAGNA MATER PROJECT

Curulus Aedilis L. Iulius Sulla wishes to thank his best collaborators, really hard workers: L. Rutilius Minervalis Aedilician Quaestor, Pompeia Minucia Tiberia, T. Iulius Sabinus, and Gn Cornelius Lentulus. Great men (and woman!).

Aside from the efforts of the Cohors, we would invite you to browse this excellent site dedicated to the Magna Mater mysteries. The content and presentation are nicely done.

Please visit the website of the Mateum of Cybel:
www.gallae.com

In the past, the project has been presented by Manius Constantinus Serapio Propraetor Italiae to the President of the Villadose Archaeological Group and the Mayor of Villadose....this town is known for a yearly festival centered on ancient Rome.

The festival entails a rather comprehensive display of Roman Markets, Roman encampments with military reenactors, ancient music, dance, food and drink, and of course, the Ludi, with javelin-throwing competitions, et al. For those who are curious about this festival, here's a link for more information:
http://www.centuriazione.it/mercato/english.html

Lucius Iulius Sulla Curulis Aedilis 2758 spoke last year to a group known as Rotaract in his resident city of Pisa. They have provided us with financial assistance.



VI. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS


We publish this list of questions and answers periodically for the benefit of those not familiar with the project or its goals. We hope this is helpful to those new to Nova Roma.

Credit to F. Apulus Caesar Consul, F. Galerius Tiberius Aurelianus Flamen Cerealis, and Marcus Iulius Perusianus, Praetor 2758 Curulis Aedilis 2757, for the information in this section.

???COULD SOMEONE EXPLAIN TO ME THE PURPOSE OF THE MAGNA MATER PROJECT???

The ultimate goal is the restoration of the temple, but this is honestly very long term, especially when one takes into account our current financial situation. But even having money, there are several other small, but necessary steps which are already under development to 'restore' the temple, in a wider significance of the meaning. To restore it also means to 'valorize' the sancturary, its historical and archaeological aspects, the significance of the cult of the Magna Mater. Put another way, 'enhancing' would be perhaps a better term for these first steps of the Project.
Periodically, a bulletin such as this report is published to keep the citizenry appraised of project developments.


????HOW ARE DONATIONS FROM NOVA ROMA UTILIZED IN THE MAGNA MATER PROJECT???

Consider this list of things to do in the near future (as part of the MM project):
i. official website
ii. material to promote this project (leaflets publications, DVD with topographical introduction to the location, archaeological remains and evidences, history of the Sanctuary of the Cult of Cybele in Rome
iii. a six-month scholarship for a student of the University of Rome
iv. multimedia CD Rom (See section II of this bulletin to review details.)


???WHAT IS THE RETURN ON THIS INVESTMENT? WHY IS THE MAGNA MATER PROJECT SO IMPORTANT???

It is important because it permits NR to spread its name into the academic world, and provides the mechanism by which we may be entitled to manage Roman monuments. It's an opportunity to make our name known in the macronational, physical world, after having done so much in the virtual, electronic world.


WILL NOVA ROMA EVER BE ALLOWED TO HOLD RITUAL THERE TO MAGNA MATER???

...Marcus Iulius Perusianus answersÂ…

A certain number of NR citizens were able to visit the proximity of the temple this past April, courtesy of a special pass by the Soprintendenza Archeologica di Roma (the entire south-west side of the Palatine, the Germalus, has been closed for the past 5-7 years). We were accompanied by a guardian for almost the entire visit, and at our tour of the house of Augustus, I guess a very simple rite could have been held. I believe that a longer than 5 minute ceremony, with an attendance of more than 10-15 people, would hardly be tolerated. I am not talking about 'religious' intolerance; it is just a question of security. Soprintendenza is working in the Germalus areas, and it is not easy to attain permission to enter. Honestly, I think to have a ritual there is currently quite impossible. Mind you, I am only speaking of what I foresee during my Aedileship.


???WHAT HISTORICAL IMPORTANCE DO THE TREES CURRENTLY GROWING ON TOP OF THE MM SANCTUARY HOLD? WHY ARE THEY MORE HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT THAN THE RESTORATION OF ONE OF THE MORE IMPORTANT TEMPLE SITES OF ROME???

Â…Marcus Iulius Perusianus answersÂ…

I have asked this of the manager of the Palatine ruins. Currently, it is deemed a useless effort to cut these environmentally and historically protected trees, as the only part of the structure remaining is the basement of the temple (not considering the short remains of a couple of columns). We won't have a better view of the bricks with the presence of these trees, which have been there for some centuries. The general guidelines of the Soprintendenza Archeologica di Roma is to maintain the monuments as they are, unless there is original material of the structure to position in their respective places. And, even when these materials are found, it takes a lot of time to study exactly where they fit. It is a matter of academic official opinion that not a single reconstruction effort can be made without appropriate archaeological evidence to support such action.




































---------------------------------
Yahoo! Shopping
Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41057 From: ~The Kreick~ Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Translation needed.
contendo et parum (parum is dissasitfied, actually)


Tessarius Quintus Moravius Severus

On 12/30/05, raymond fuentes <praefectus2324@...> wrote:
>
> Sorry, I left out topic!
> --- Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> <praefectus2324@...> wrote:
> > Salvete Omnes, can anyone tell me how to say
> struggle
> > and disappointment in Latin? Thanks.
> >
> > S P Q R
> >
> > Fidelis Ad Mortem.
> >
> > Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> > Roman Citizen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
> > http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/
>
>
> S P Q R
>
> Fidelis Ad Mortem.
>
> Marcvs Flavivs Fides
> Roman Citizen
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________
> Yahoo! DSL � Something to write home about.
> Just $16.99/mo. or less.
> dsl.yahoo.com
>
>
> ------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> - Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>"
> on the web.
>
> - To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> - Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>



--
Tessarius Q. Moravius Severus
Legio VI Ferrata


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41058 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: COHORS CENSORIS CFBQ, 2758 FIRST HALF-YEAR CENSORIAL GENERAL REPORT
Salvete Quirites!

Here I present the first of my two last General Reports about the
Censorial work. I will publish it in this mail and hope that our ear
Magister Aranarius (or his Successor) will be able to publish it on
the Nova Roma site. The second of my two last General Reports about
the Censorial work will be very short and should be published within
20 hours.

******************

COHORS CENSORIS CFBQ,
2758 FIRST HALF - YEAR CENSORIAL GENERAL REPORT



Contents:

Cohors Organisation
Statistical Data
Reports from the Officinae
Officina Ductus
Officina ad Approbationes
Officina Iuriis et Investigatio
Officina ad Comunicationes
Report of Censor Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
INTERNAL ORGANISATION


Officina Ductus (the leading office)

Responsibilities:

- Writes proposals for censorial edicta;
- Makes translations from and into Latin;
- Maintains the Cohors website;
- Compiles statistics and monthly reports;
- Compiles a "Censors Handbook";
- Started work with the "Domus project"
- Assists the Scriba Censoris Ductus CFBQ in his quality as
"Second-in-command" in the Cohors Censoris CFBQ.


Caput Officina: Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus, Rogator

Scribae: Marcus Flavius Philippus Conservatus
(Latin translations, website & Censorial handbook)
Vibia Ulpia Aestiva
(Reports and statistics. Domus project)
Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia
(welcome packets for new citizens in Provinciae when the governor
prefer such support)



Officina Approbatio (Office of approvals)

Responsibilities:

- Approves applicants for citizenship;
- Assists citizens in all naming matters;
- Assists citizens in all adoption matters;
- Suggests improvements and updates the name lists on the Nova Roma website;


Caput Officina: Marcia Martiana Gangalia Marcella, Rogatrix
(in addition to supervisory duties, handled some approvals and testing)

Scribae Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis
(general approval work)
Marcus Adrianus Complutensis
(specialised in handling Spanish applicants)
Manius Constantinus Serapio
(specialised in handling Italian applicants)
Lucius Rutilius Minervalis
(specialised in handling French applicants)

Officina Iuriis et Investigatio (Legal Office and Investigation)

Responsibilities:


- Provides the Censor with legal advice (except when it comes to
Nota) and gather legal texts needed for the Censorial work;
- Working closely with the officina ad approbationes, provides a list
of acceptable praenomina, nomina and cognomina (it also provides
sources for these names).

Caput Officina: Marca Hortensia Maior

Scriba: Titus Octavius Salvius



Officina ad Communicationes (Office of Communications):
Responsibilities:

- Organises the distribution of Century points;
- Organises the division of citizens in centuries and tribes with the
assistance
of all the other officinae (preparations for the elections);
- Answers mails to the Censors;
- Organises the Gens-registration;
- Organises the preparations for the Census.

Caput Officina: Quintus Cassius Calvus

Scribae: Annia Octavia Indagatrix
Marcus Arminius Maior


Other assisting offices:

* Scribae Censoris Religio CFBQ

Responsible for advising the Censor on religious matters

Scriba: Gaius Modius Athanasius




* Scribae Censoris Administrator CFBQ (Administrative Censorial Scribe CFBQ)
Organises re-registrations of gentes and assists Calvus in the
Officina ad Communicationes

Scriba: Marcus Octavius Germanicus

Scribae who have worked with the cohors but have left during January to June:

Lucius Modius Kaelus: Officina Ductus

Gaia Flavia Aureliana: Officina Approbatio


STATISTICAL DATA



During the period from 1st January 2758 to 30th June 2758, the Cohors
Censoris CFBQ dealt with the following.


267 applications received.

Of which:

I - 145 had no issues. 22 have received full citizenship; 123 have
been granted provisional citizenship and are awaiting final test and
approval.


II - 108 had issues.

106 were name issues.
- 68 were resolved with 20 having received full citizenship and 48
having been granted provisional citizenship.
- 38 applications remain unresolved.

2 were address issues.


III - 13 are applications from minors and are on hold.

IV - 1 application was rejected.


Other matters:

I - 5 name changes were requested and granted.

II - 38 resignations were received and have been recorded.


Net flow of citizens :

42 awards of full citizenship.
38 resignations
Net flow = + 4

Comments: the resignation of the entire Gens Minia (31 members) has
greatly influenced the net flow figure which, in consequence, should
be seen as abnormal.



Overall comments:

There are a certain number of citizens who, despite having been
granted provisional citizenship, fail to take the test or just simply
disappear.
Because of this, it is expected that only a handful of the 171
provisional citizenships granted to date will ever obtain the full
citizenship status.

This is a direct result of the probationary period and of the
citizenship test that now allows Nova Roma to retain only those
citizens who are really interested in participating in the life of
the Republic.
It also puts into perspective the high number of citizens (including
Socii) whose citizenship was processed prior to the implementation of
the Lex de Tironicio Civium Novorum. In comparison, for example, 234
applicants were granted full citizenship last year, from March to
December : that is 195 for half a year at pro-rata. In other words,
full citizenship awards have dropped by 78.5% between 2757 and 2758!


Others:

54.30% of all applications actually present a name that has any
bearing with Roman nomenclature, an increase of almost 10 percentage
points compared to last year's 44.50%: It indicated that the
publication of the new name pages has had beneficial consequences in
helping new applicants to choose their name.

14.23% of all applicants do not bother to take their application any
further once the censores have contacted them in the first instance
upon identification of a name problem. This is an improvement on last
year's 35% although the current year's figure is expected to rise as
many new applicants disappear before the probationary period is over.
The reasons why an application may originally have been delayed also cover:
- Missing personal data (ie valid address)
- Suspicious personal data (ie John Bogus living in funny land)


REPORT FROM THE OFFICINA DUCTUS


Website:
Marcus Flavius Philippus Consevatus kept an good eye over the
website. The FAQ is finished and added on the website.
A new, more user friendly version is due to go on line in August.

New and corrected Edicta:
Edictum Censoris CFQ XXVII about the emancipation of Nova Roma
citizens and the date 29th of January -link

Edictum Censoris CFQ XXVI about the renewal of Censorial edicta for 2758 -link


REPORT FROM THE OFFICINA AD APPROBATIONES


The primary duties were the handling of all new applicants and
helping applicants who had problems finding a name.

The citizenship tests were also handled by this Officina. Each
citizen's test was handled by the scriba who processed the citizen's
application, so all of the scribae were involved in the testing
procedures. A preliminary letter was sent to each of the provisional
citizens before sending the test to make sure the citizen was ready
for it, since if the citizen does not return the test within 72
hours, it is considered a failure. As the tests were not ready until
April, there were a few citizens whose probationary period was over
before the tests were available, but most preliminary letters were
sent one to two weeks before the end of the probationary period.





REPORT FROM THE OFFICINA IURIIS ET INVESTIGATIO

The duties were researching all Nova Roman gentes for historical
validity and their division into Republican and Imperial gentes, and
dealing with all emancipations after January 29th, which Scriba Titus
Octavius Salvius compiled into a list and made notes in the Album
Civium.

REPORT FROM THE OFFICINA AD COMMUNICATIONES

Translations:

Citizenship Application translations into Italian and Spanish

The following form letters from the Censor's tools are now available
in Spanish and Italian:

Resignation
Provisional Citizenship pending 90 day period & test (new and also
in English)
New Citizen (to be sent after 90 day period and passing the test)
Non-conforming name
Application of a Minor (revised version)
Incomplete Application


A revised Roman Names page was posted to the website

All provincial and central government appointments that
were announced on the ML have been posted and were updated by Marcus
Arminius Maior within 48 hours of the original announcements.

Questions concerning why some gentes have no member on the Album
Gentium pages but when searching the Album Civium there appears to
be citizens using that Nomen. Explained the difference between
Socius and Citizen. Looking into figuring out a way to add after
the name of the person in the Album Civium whether that person is
Socius or Citizen in order to avoid confusion in the future.

The Album Gentium has been updated to produce output that is in
conformance with current family leges:

1. The title "pater/mater"familias has been edited to no longer
appear in the overview of a gens.
2. Gens no longer labeled "patrician/plebian" as Patrician/Plebian
status is now conferred upon families and no longer dependent upon
the gens "classification." Now those who are Patrician within any
gens are so designated with an (*) asterix behind their name.
3. Application forms now automatically enroll all new citizens as
Plebian as per current leges.
4. Updated Citizen overviews to show Provisional Citizenship.
Working on figuring out how to make these people appear in the Album
Gentium/Civium and Provincial listings as such.

Pending Issues: What to do about closed gens and those with only

Socius members.

Works in progress:

List of last year's Assidui broken down by how long holding
citizenship of Nova Roma, about 2/3 done.

Re-alignment of the Tribes: Have procurred the list of voter codes
that voted in the prior December election.





























REPORT FROM CENSOR C. FABIUS BUTEO QUINTILIANUS

The citizens test and probation periods
The citizens test was created according to the legislation. How to
handle the probation periods was worked out.

Appointments of Language Scribae
During the spring I appointed Language Scribae, a position tghat
worked out very fine. Inthe end we had one Italian Scriba, one
Spanish Scriba and one French Scriba. As we also had Scribae who
talked Latin, German and Swedish in the Cohors contacts with new
citizens werenot a big problem any longer.

Routine work during the spring
During the Spring the "new" Officina Approbatio found its routines
under the supervision and leadership of Marcia Martiana Gangalia
Marcella, Rogatrix. Here new tasks were added to the work with
correct names, such as the citizens test and the probational period.
Who should handle which applicants and how, was estabilshed.

The burden of a Censor and a Coilleague at last
The work of a Censor has continued to be huge and the ambitions to be
very high. For the first time I had a Colleague Gnaeus Equitius
Marinus Censor and we decided that I should continue with the name
issues that are te main part of the Censorial work, but far from all
of it. AS change of responsibilities should occur on tghe 1st of July
when I should take responsibility for the Census, the "Domus project"
and transfering the most important of my edicta to a lex.

The Cohors
Never has it been more clear than now that a Censor needs a Cohors.

The name reform
During 2758 the name reform was to be fine-tuned. Which also was to
be the case.

Latin
I have had two citizens who have had a special responsibility to see
to it that we are using correct Latin in the edicta and in the
approval of Roman names (especially cognomina). During our work
others have also become involved in doing research for Latin names
and other task connected with Latin. This has become a nice traditon
in the Cohors and everybody takes part in this responsibility.

Supervising the work and political discussions
The supervision of the work in the Cohors was made easier as most us
had been there for a while. The Capiti also made the work much easier.

I continue to stick to my main rule to never ask this kind of
assistants (administrative assistants) to advise me politically and
never to take care of any sensitive discussions with my colleague and
others. I have tried to follow this rule very closely in the
Censorial Cohors as I did in the Cohors Consulis before.

Edicta
Two more edicta about Censorial issues, except the appointment and
organizational edicta, were published, as:

1. Edictum Censoris CFQ XXVII about the emancipation of Nova
Roma citizens and the date 29th of January
2. Edictum Censoris CFBQ XXXII about the General Censorial
report of 2757 and the Censorial change of duties.

Further administrative work and research
The different small projects continued and research of historical
nomina continued.

Other Censorial work
As before much of the work as a Censor was done outside the Cohors,
even without the knowledge of the Scribae. This work continued to
range from preparational "talks" with the Tribunes to get edicta past
their veto, over to the many issues were the Censores are consulted
by other magistrates.


Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Censor, Consularis et Senator
Civis Romanus sum

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFBQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41059 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
C. Equitius Cato Claudiae Iuliae M. Hortensiae Maori quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

With all due respect, Marca Hortensia, your post (on Friday, 23
December at 1.33AM) reads in its entirety:


"M. Hortensia Senatrice P. Strabonis spd;
thank you thank you Senatrix Pompeia Strabo for an
excellent suggestion; I am very grateful!....I veto Albucius's
election call, as an election of the Plebians has occurred...I voted
in the cista and can affirm that the CPT was listed and candidates
within as well as the brilliant 'write in' choice...that saves wear
and tear on the webmaster, the diribatores & the Quirites so we
won't need that by-election that my error caused.
Again my apologies for forgetting to call the CPT,
bene vale
M. Hortensia Maior TRP -2005..."


According to the laws and Constitution of Nova Roma, this is an
invalid pronouncement of an intercessio, as it lacks almost every
single item necessary for a valid intercessio according to the LEX
IVNIA DE MAGISTRATVVM AETATE LEX DIDIA GEMINA DE POTESTATE
TRIBUNICIA, and is therefore null and void. It does not, legally,
exist and therefore no intercessio has been pronounced against
Albucius' call for the CPT to be convened. The fact that your attempt
at intercessio was invalid was pointed out to you by myself,
Apollonius Cordus, and Diana Octavia within four hours of your post,
and was accompanied by both an explanation of why it was invalid and
how to correctly issue an intercessio, but you neglected to do so and
no other tribune issued any other type of intercessio either --- and
Albucius did not withdraw his call.

Now, this may be de facto a moot point, but it is unacceptable for the
laws to be simply cast aside, ignored, or improperly applied simply
for the sake of convenience.

There was no intercessio.

Albucius' call was simply ignored.

Vale et valete,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia Claudiae Iuliae spd;
> December 27th around 2am I vetoed tribune Albucius's
> veto. Unless 3 tribune overturn my veto the plebeian elections &
> results will go forward. My sincere prayers to the new tribunes; I
> shall burn incense for this coming year's success
> bene vale in pacem deorum
> Marca Hortensia Maior TRP (2005)
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41060 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: A nonv veto veto
Salve Marca Hortensia

Who said in part "arg! I jolly well vetoed Memmius's edict around 2am.
Senatrix Pompeia was in the forum & Cordus and Piscinus discussed the
issue of legality and legal reasons the vote it fine over at the CPT
where it was also posted"

Yes you did attempt to veto his edict (post # 40928 ) and it was pointed out to you , by former Tribune Diana Octavia Aventina (post #40930) that because you had not followed the law in terms of form and content your veto was null and void the moment you posted it.

From the LEX DIDIA GEMINA DE POTESTATE TRIBVNICIA

3. When a Tribunus Plebis issues an intercessio against the act(s) of another Tribunus Plebis, it must include the following elements:

a. The official name and office of the Tribunus Plebis against whose act(s) that intercessio is interposed.

b. The article(s) of the Constitution or the leges violated by the Tribunus Plebis' act(s).

4. If the intercessio of a Tribunus Plebis does not include these two elements, the intercessio shall be invalid. The time constraints of the Lex Labiena de Intercessione shall continue to hold such that, if a new intercessio is not issued before the seventy-two hour limit, counted from the act(s) which occasioned the original intercessio, the Tribunus Plebis shall issue no new intercessio pertaining to that act or those acts.


Former Tribune Diana Octavia Aventina even gave you the grounds on which you could reissue your veto and have it be legal. Cato also made statements to that effect and encouraged you to reissue it but you never did.

Even if you had written it right the constitution and laws state that

"Should the number or the Tribunes who choose to disagree with an intercessio equal or exceed the number of Tribunes who choose to support it, the intercessio shall be revoked."

As far as I remember only you and Memmius made any statements for or against the veto making it one for and one against. In order to carry if forward you would have needed at least one more tribune to support you, they did not. You never reissued you veto after you were told it was invalid ergo no veto.

On Dec 24 another tribune finally posted and Tribune Domitius Constantinus Fuscus post # 40968 was in support of Memmius's call for new elections that made it 2 to 1 against your non veto veto. The other tribunes were silent.

It seems that Nova Roman law has once again been pushed aside as something to be ignored or gotten around when found to be inconvenient .

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Still a candidate for Praetor














[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41061 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: COHORS CENSORIS CFBQ, 2758 SECOND HALF-YEAR CENSORIAL GENERAL REPORT
Salvete Quirites!

Here I present the second of my two last General Reports about the
Censorial work. I will publish it in this mail and hope that our dear
Magister Aranearius (or his Successor) will be able to publish it on
the Nova Roma site. This is the last of my many reports and it is my
hope that future Censores might get guidance from the reports.

******************

COHORS CENSORIS CFBQ,
2758 SECOND HALF - YEAR CENSORIAL GENERAL REPORT

COHORS CENSORIS CFBQ,
2758 SECOND HALF - YEAR CENSORIAL GENERAL REPORT


Contents:

Cohors Organisation
Officina Ductus
Officina Iuriis et Investigatio
Officina Census
Advisors
The Domus project
The Census
Legislation
Report of Censor Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
INTERNAL ORGANISATION

Officina Ductus (the leading office)

Responsibilities:

- Writes proposals for censorial edicta;
- Makes translations from and into Latin;
- Maintains the Cohors website;
- Compiles statistics and monthly reports;
- Compiles a "Censors Handbook";
- Work with the "Domus project"
- Assists the Scriba Censoris Ductus CFBQ in his quality as
"Second-in-command" in the Cohors Censoris CFBQ.

Caput Officina: Gaius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus, Rogator

Scribae: Vibia Ulpia Aestiva
(Reports and statistics. Domus project)
Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia
(welcome packets for new citizens in Provinciae when the governor
prefer such support)
Marcus Arminius Maior
(Organises the updating of Century points)
Quintus Fabius Allectus
(Domus project)


Officina Iuriis et Investigatio (Legal Office and Investigation)

Responsibilities:

- Provides the Censor with legal advice (except when it comes to
Nota) and gather legal texts needed for the Censorial work;
- Working closely with the officina ad approbationes, provides a list
of acceptable praenomina, nomina and cognomina (it also provides
sources for these names).

Caput Officina: Marca Hortensia Maior

Scriba: Titus Octavius Salvius
Officina Census

Responsibilities:

- Execute the Census, which is a much more complicated task than may
be shown here.

Caput Officina: Marcus Moravius Piscinus Horatianus

Scribae: Aulus Apollonius Cordus
Marcus Antonius Biachius
Quintus Cassius Calvus
Marcus Octavius Germanicus
Marca Hortensia Maior

Assisting Scribae Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Marcus Curiatius Complutensis
Manius Constantinus Serapio

Assisting citizen
Marcus Lucretius Agricola


Advisors in Cohors Censoris CFBQ (also Officina Approbatio in Cohors
Censoris Gnaeus Equitius Marinus)

Responsibilities:

- Advise Censor Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus while continuing
their work with applicants in Cohors Censoris Gnaeus Equitius Marinus.


Marcia Martiana Gangalia Marcella, Rogatrix

Scribae Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis
Marcus Adrianus Complutensis
Manius Constantinus Serapio
Lucius Rutilius Minervalis

Other assisting offices:

* Scribae Censoris Religio CFBQ

Responsible for advising the Censor on religious matters

Scriba: Gaius Modius Athanasius


Scribae who have worked with the Cohors but have left during July to December:

Quintus Cassius Calvus
I was privileged to have had such an assistant and friend I will
always miss him.
Annia Octavia Indagatrix
She warned me that her duties in the Navy would force her to
disappear, which was what happened.
Marcus Flavius Philippus Conservatus
As Marcus Flavius Philippus Conservatus was responsible for the work
with the "Censor's Handbook the workwith it stopped when he
disappeared.




THE "DOMUS PROJECT"

During the period from 1st January 2758 to 30th June 2758, the
Officina Ductus dealt with the the "Domus project. The responsible
Scriba was Vibia Ulpia Aestiva, who was assisted by Quintus Fabius
Allectus.

The Album Gentium was in a mess after the Gens, Familia and Domii
reforms. This had to be corrected to update the Album Gentium. The
new legislation also created the domii and these needed to be defined
and citizens needed to be allocated to Domii and Familia. Who was
Pater familias of the new Familia needed to be establish.

Most of this work is now done and was published in "Edictum Censoris
CFBQ XLI about the the correction of the family facts in the "Domus
project". The "Domus project may be studied at
http://novaroma.org/bin/domus

The completion of the "Domus Project" now rest in the hands of my
dear colleague Gnaeus Equitius Marinus.



THE CENSUS

The Census was started by "Edictum Censoris CFBQ XXXIII about Census
of Nova Roma 2758" and ended with "Edictum Censoris CFBQ XXXIX about
the end of the Census of Nova Roma 2758".

The work with the Census is possible to see at:

http://www.novaroma.org/census2857.html

The Census was supervised and the report was written with great
skill by Marcus Moravius Piscinus Horatianus. Nova Roma should have
such a administrator and leader at every position, then it would be
lucky.



LEGISLATION

Most of the edicta under my two years term was gathered and edited in
"Lex de Nominibus Approbationibusque". Most of this work was done by
my "Chief of Staff" and I am very gratefull for his hard work with
edicta, this legislation and other important tasks.

When this piece of legislation was put to the people it had to be
done by someone that could call the Comitia to order. Franciscus
Apulus Caesar Consul changed the name to "Lex Fabia de Nominibus
Approbationibusque".


REPORT FROM CENSOR C. FABIUS BUTEO QUINTILIANUS

The routine work
The routine work in the Cohors continued durin the autumn..

The Cohors
The Cohors still had to work hard. The Scribae involved in the "Domus
Project" and the Census had to work even harder.

Further administrative work and research
The different small projects continued and research of historical
nomina continued.

The "Censor's Handbook"
As Marcus Flavius Philippus Conservatus was responsible for the work
with the "Censor's Handbook the work with it stopped when he
disappeared. I really hope that such a Handbook will be done by
future Censores.

Other Censorial work
As before much of the work as a Censor is done outside the Cohors,
even without the knowledge of the Scribae. This work continued to
range from preparational "talks" with the Tribunes to get edicta past
their veto, over to the many issues were the Censores are consulted
by other magistrates.


Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Censor, Consularis et Senator
Civis Romanus sum

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFBQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41062 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Fwd: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - convening of the Comitia Plebis Tributa
---Salvete Galerius et Omnes:

I'll give you all another reason the edicta of Albucius (scroll
below) is vetoable, lending to reinforcement of the validity of the
recent Plebian elections.... in the spirit of more undisputable
reverence to the Lex Didia Gemina.

Simply put, it is erroneous in content. Marcus Bianchus Antonius is
listed as a candidate in this proposed second election of Albucius.
He in fact had withdrawn his candidacy, as did Albucius, in apparent
desire to keep the mos maiorum antiqua where Tribunes didn't run for
a consecutive term. This was before Tribune Albucius proposed
another election.

I believe the potestas of the tribunes prevails if they feel there's
reason to pronounce intercessio in cases of violation of the spirit
of constitutional ideals (the constitution gives them this
discretion) caused perhaps by an overreverence of legal
technicalities. I can see where certain intercessio would be
difficult to define by use of the Lex Didia. Further, this law is
subordinate to the constitution, although, for sure it is designed
to be used in pursuance of the constitution, as all laws.

But all this Blah Blah of mine aside, I also feel personally that,
allowing for cases such as the aforementioned, the Lex Didia should
ideally be followed as closely as possible. Another veto could be
reissued using this information, but yet, perhaps arrangements were
made on the Comitia Plebis Tributa list, which neither myself, nor
other Patricians are privy to. So I am loathe to comment or pass
judgement on that which I have not seen.

At any rate, the last election has been affirmed by Hortensia
Tribuna and if this bit of information makes things more valid, then
great... ....by the prevailing Leges Moravia/Arminia on Plebian
elections the candidates must be lawfully and thus correctly listed,
and the list proclaimed was incorrect. One candidate had withdrawn
and there was no verbage that I saw in that edictum of Albucius
acknowledging such.

Actually I spotted this a while ago, but since it didn't appear as
though the issue was going to be rehashed, especially Dec. 30, I
forgot about it, only to remember with these last posts.

Another thing....Marcus Bianchus Antonius is listed, with his date
and time of declaration, etc. but also as being 'in charge' ....what
does or did that intend to mean? In charge of what?


At any rate, we can't reconvene the elections...we don't have the
hands, the Plebs have spoken..the only thing was that the convention
was not formally declared, although the cista was open, and rather
visible to those who voted in the other two comitia...but again,
that is the personal opinion of this patrician and not intended to
meddle with the plebs.

Yours in mutual potesteslessness :)

Po



In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tribune Albucius"
<albucius_aoe@h...> wrote:

Publius Memmius Albucius Plebeiis civibus omnibusque s.d.

Valete omnes,

[copy of the message just posted in the CPT list]

I have declared in the first days of December that I would simply
deal with the registration of the plebeian candidates to our annual
elections.

For registrating is one first step, convening the comitia plebis is
a
second one.

It appears that none of my Hon. Colleagues Tribunes has *convened*
the plebeian elections. Magister Areanearius Minucius has confirmed
me today that he did not receive any convening text.

So we would have no Plebs elections and no plebeian magistrates next
Jan. 1st ( !) ?

So please find all, in the absence of any answer from my est.
Colleagues, an official convening edict.

You will thus see that the (official) contio period is tiny and
falling in Christmas time. So please all (Christians... ;-) )
forgive "us" this. I hope that the fact that we all know well now
the
names of our 1 + 5 candidates, and also that there are not more
runners than open positions, will make debates shorter and easier.

The voting period must legally last 5 days. So votes will be able to
be cast till 30/12 midnight Rome time. Here too, please all
diribitores, the magister aranearius and other magistrates and
assistants involved in the process of counting and stating the votes
forgive this extreme schedule.

I propose, if every constitutional power agrees this proposal, that
the first days of January 2006 could help these last processings
ending, if necessary. Meanwhile, during the first days of next 2759
auc, our 1+5 candidates will be able to take contact, unofficially,
with their future tasks.

A by-election will have to be called by the new-elected Tribunes to
get a 2nd Aedilis Plebis.

Valete omnes,

PMA
__________________________________________________

TRIBUNE P. MEMMIUS ALBUCIUS EDICT
ON THE CONVENING OF THE COMITIA PLEBIS TRIBUTA
(Latin text available on demand)

I, Publius Memmius Albucius, Tribune of the Plebs, by the authority
vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of Nova Roma,

In view of the Constitution of Nova Roma, specially its article
III.C., IV.7. and IV.A.5,
In view of my Edict (Dec. 9 12 :57 CPT list) on the annual calling
for candidates for the plebeian offices of Tribunes of the Plebs and
Aediles of the Plebs (« ELECTIONS - PLEBS - 2nd period closed -
OFFICIAL CANDIDACIES »),

Edicts :

Article 1

The Comitia plebis tributa are convened.

Article 2

The schedule of this comitial session is the following one :

- debates (contio) :

. beginning on December 24, 2005, at 00:00 Rome time ;
. ending on December 25, 2005, at 24:00 Rome time.

- vote :

. beginning on December 26, 2005, at 00:00 Rome time;
. ending on December 30, 2005, at 24:00 Rome time.


Article 3

The agenda of this comitial session is the following one :

1. Election of the five Tribunes of the Plebs for 2006 (2759 a.u.c.).
The 5 citizens whose candidacy has been legally registered are :

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa (CTP list declaration on Nov. 26, 12 :14 am,
mess. 890, registered on Nov. 26, 11 :02 am, mess. CTP list 891) ;

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (CTP list declaration on Nov. 28, 7 :39
am, mess. 892, registered on Nov. 28, 7 :49 pm, mess. CTP list 894) ;

Cnaeus Salix Astur (CTP list declaration on Nov. 28, 12 :38 pm, mess.
893, registered on Nov. 28, 7 :55 pm, mess. CTP list 895) ;

Marcus Arminius Maior (CTP list declaration on Dec. 2, 9 :10 pm,
mess. 897, registered on Dec. 2, 11 :31 pm, mess. CTP list 899) ;

Marcus Moravius Piscinus Horatianus (CTP list declaration on Dec. 3,
9 :56 pm, mess. 901, registered on Dec. 4, 6 :23 pm, mess. CTP list
904) ;

Marcus Bianchius Antonius, currently in charge (CTP list declaration
on Dec. 6, 9 :55 pm, mess. 910, registered on Dec. 7, 7 :54 pm, mess.
CTP list 911).


2. Election of the two Aediles of the Plebs for 2006 (2759 a.u.c.).
The only citizen whose candidacy has been legally registered is :

Julilla Sempronia Magna (CTP list
declaration on Dec. 5, 7 :13 pm, mess. 906, registered on Dec. 5,
11 :14 pm, mess. CTP list 907).


Article 4

The appropriate magistrates of Nova Roma are responsible,
as far as each one is concerned by the present edict,
for executing it. This edict which will be published in the
Tabularium of Nova Roma.

Issued in Caen, city of the Viducasses, France, this twenty second
day of December, 2005 C.E. (22 December 2759), during the consulate
of
Fr. Apulus Caesar and Ga. Popillius Laenas

scr. Cadomago, civ. Viducassium, Gallia,
a.d. XI Kal. Ian. MMDCCLVIIII a.u.c.

Publius Memmius Albucius
Tribunus Plebis
>

--- End forwarded message ---
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41064 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Apologies
A private message to Pompeia Strabo may have been posted here. It was
my error.

Valete,

Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41065 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Fwd: Re: [CPT] [Nova-Roma] Re: ELECTIONS - convening of the Comiti
M. Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
this is from the CPT list, a sensible discussion by plebeians
about the plebeian elections.


A. Apollonius M. Moravio omnibusque sal.

> Tribuni were not inaugurated as were magistrates
> elected in the
> comitia centuriata. The tribuni, technically, do
> not have auspicia
> to "borrow". The tribuni were consecrated into
> office by a lex
> sacra, and it was the opinion of iuris consulti that
> this did not
> make the tribuni or aediles plebi sacrosanct, but
> instead made
> anyone who harmed them in sacer. There again, you
> can't "borrow"
> what the tribuni do not have.

Indeed, but notice that I didn't say anyone should
borrow the tribunes' auspices; rather I suggested
that, by analogy with the practice of borrowing
auspices from the higher magistrates, the magister
aranearius could be considered to have borrowed the
jus agendi cum plebe. The jus agendi, of course, is
not a religious power like the powers of auxilium and
intercessio, but simply a civil power conveyed by the
consent of the plebs, which logically can therefore be
borrowed.

> There is another ancient law that makes sacer anyone
> who would have
> the plebes become left without tribuni.

Indeed. As I believe I said in the message you're
replying to, we must on no account be without
tribunes.

> Tribunus Memmius is entirely correct. The CPT was
> not legally
> convened, and therefore it could not legally
> assemble as a comitia.

We need to be slightly careful about sweeping
categorical statements like this. In this particular
case I agree with you, but it would not be correct to
say that no assembly properly convened can ever
produce legally valid results. As you know, curule
magistrates vitio creati (e.g. elected by an
ill-omened assembly) were still regarded as legitimate
magistrates, although they would probably be asked to
resign. But yes, what we have here is a more basic
breach of procedure than that.

> However, in the absense of tribuni, as sometimes
> occurred, and in
> the absense of a comitia assembling, the vox populi
> still held full
> authority, since the voice of the people was
> regarded as the voice
> of the Gods speaking through the people. In a
> sense, the people
> hold their own auspicia just as all auctoritas
> extends from the Gods
> through the people.
>
> I think we can suppose here that the voice of the
> people has been
> heard to affirm the candidates into the plebeian
> offices. No
> formalities or legalistic arguments can preclude
> what the people
> have already expressed. Such an affirmation amounts
> to a
> consecratio. The current tribuni need only to
> confirm that the
> previous vote was a consecratio by affirmation. It
> wouldn't be the
> first time that tribuni took office under such
> circumstance. Indeed
> the first tribuni were conscrated on the Mons Sacer
> by affirmation
> of the pebes.

Certainly: and I hope you were not suggesting that I
or anyone else have tried to use "formalities or
legalistic arguments" to "preclude what the people
have already expressed". Quite the opposite. My
suggestion was to use a technical legal argument to
explain why the outcome of the election should be
regarded as valid after all; yours is to use a
technical sacral argument to do the same. In any case
we can agree about the outcome. As often in Roman
history, religious and constitutional law operate
along similar lines. :)



___________________________________________________________
NEW Yahoo! Cars - sell your car and browse thousands of new and used
cars online! http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/

--- End forwarded message ---
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41066 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Fwd: Re: [CPT] [Nova-Roma] Re: ELECTIONS - convening of the Comiti
M. Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
and here is M.Moravius Piscinius's worthy argument as well. He
will be one of the next tribunes. My veto technical or not is
utterly besides the point.
The Plebeians have acted and spoken. It is their decision.

I absolutely refuse to violate their collective voice, as for you
Cato & Paulinus, Cato it's none of your business! And you are trying
to meddle in Plebeian affairs; a very dangerous precedent.

Paulinus - pick up a history book and read the CPT list!!

I for one am not going to remain a tribune one moment longer; it is
for the duly elected ones to continue. And that's my final position.
You can talk with the other tribunes and find out what they intend
to do.
vale
Marca Hortensia Maior TRP (2005)


"A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@y...> wrote: A.
Apollonius M. Moravio omnibusque sal.

AAC: I don't think it's particularly useful to get into a discussion
of whether the religious flaws or the legal
flaws are more important or serious. In fact I would
respectfully suggest that it's a false dichotomy.

MMP: The two are bound together so that they cannot be easily
divorced from one another. My point is that you cannot look at any
legal flaws without considering the religious implications.
However, as to whether a division can be made, in Institutiones
Iustiniani II. 1-11, Gaius wrote: "The first division of things is
into two classes; for some are subject to divine law, some to human
law." By didvision is meant the separation of a genera into its
species. Gaius made a further division of divine law between what
could be taken as sacrum and what is religiosum. Other
commentators, like Aelius Gallus, noted a third subspecies in what
is sanctum that is neither sacrum nor religiosum.

"If what specifically makes temples sacrum is present, then the
same can be said of laws and institutions put forward by the
ancestors as sanctum, in order that they cannot be violated without
punishment (GRF Aelius fr. 18)"

Aelius also pointed out that "where laws are carried before the
people ... on a prohibited day (nefas)" they were to be regarded as
religiosum.

So the Romans did make subtle distinctions, and along with that
distinguished between the seriousnes of any errors. The "voice of
the People" whether given in a duly convened comitia or not, would
be regarded as sanctum under certain circumstances, and I think that
would apply here. The reason why I think it applies here is that
the people expressed their desires at the cista that was set aside
to take the vote, and that this "space" could thus be taken as a
templum for the intended purpose. Also Pontifex Modianus took the
auspices prior to the setting up of the cista. So although not
everything was duly performed under the law, the context in which
the "vote" occurred still had a proper religious nature IMHO to make
the result sanctum. I do not believe that the comitia were convened
on a prohibited day, since public business could be conducted during
part of a dies endotercisus, but had they been it would be a lesser
offense of religiosum. A violation of what is held sacrum
would be incestum, where a violation of what is sanctum could be
taken as either incestum or religiosum, depending on the nature of
the offense. Any decree of an individual magistrate, and even a
senatusconsultum, is not sanctum. So a violation of a decree may be
illegal, but such a violation would not carry the same religious
implications as where a lex was violated.

Thus in the priority of things, the announcement of a tribunus
plebis, amounting to a magisterial decree, would not carry as much
weight. The absence of an announcement might be taken as religiosum
in that it was an error that violated a previously existing lex.
But the decision of the people, if taken as sanctum, has a higher
priority and to violate or discard it I think would thus be a
greater offense.

AAC: Dies
comitiales, nefasti, fasti, &c. are legal constructs
as much as the time-limits for counting votes are. No
ancient source makes the slightest suggestion that
they were created by divine revelation or are in any
way inherent in the nature of the universe: they were
quite clearly created by the ancient pontifices for a
deliberate purpose. They are man-made, state-made
rules, i.e. law.

MMP: Exactly. The designations of dies fastus and dies nefastus
resulted from the publication of a civil calendar in 304 BCE by
Aedilis Curule Gnaeus Flavius. They may have been based on
religious prescriptions provided by pontifices, but the Fasti as we
have them did not constitute a religious calendar. Further the
official calendar of Nova Roma, based as it is on a Gregorian
calendar, is a civil calendar set by Nova Roma law, but really has
little connection with the religio Romana or Roman traditions.

<snippet>
AAC: If, as I suggested (and I am not too strongly attached
to the suggestion - indeed I'm inclined to prefer
yours), we regard the assembly as duly convened by
proxy, then the religious question is whether an
assembly convened on such a day and extending over the
following days is vitiated or not, and whether the
elected magistrates are vitio creati or not. But if we
adopt your suggestion and regard the election as not
having been conducted by a duly convened assembly at
all but merely by the spontaneous expression of the
will of the plebs, then the religious question is, I
think, more difficult: it is whether a spontaneous
acclamation of that kind is to be regarded as subject
to the normal pontifical rules on dies comitiales at all.

MMP: Interestiing. A particular day is to be considered dies
nefastus or dies fastus under the traditions of the religio Romana
depending on whether it is a religious festival or not. Religious
festivals are properly constituted according to stellar risings and
lunar cycles. The civil calendar instead used fixed dates, and the
civil calendar therefore rarely coincided with the religious
calendar set by the pontifices. A day was set as dies comitialis
under civil law as a subcategory of days held dies fastus, and as
you say pertain only to a comitia. I do not think that just any
affirmation of the People can be taken as sanctum, but would instead
depend on the context in which it was given. That does not rule out
an affirmation given on a day that is dies nefastus. If the People
assembled to celebrate a festival and gave an affirmation it could
be made in a religious context that would accord the decision as
sanctum; theoretically at least. So I am inclined to think that a
civil designation of a day as either dies fastus or dies nefastus
doesn't always matter. What is more important is location, in an
area set off as a templum, and ritual procedure that invites the
sanction of the Gods. Romans were accustomed to follow ritual
procedure even if a comitia was not convened. The concilium plebis
on the Mons Sacra, pro exempli, followed ritual procedures in a
location with religious context, but was not technically a comitia.
A comitia is properly convened under both civil and religious law.
If the civil procedures are followed but the religious procedures
are not, then the decision of a comitia can be questioned. That was
the case in the elections held by consul Sempronius Gracchus since
the templum in which he conducted the elections was not properly
constituted under religious prescriptions. The reverse, though,
where religious prescriptions were duly followed but not properly
under civil law, as with the concilium on the Mons Sacra at the time,
the decision was still valid. So if we do make a dichotomy between
civil law and religious law, I think that religious law would take
precedence over a minor error in civil law. But the two were so
bound together that it would be difficult to violate the one without
also violating the other.
Well, interesting, but perhaps we should take this up more
elsewhere. In the discussion portion of your class on Roman law at
Academia Thules perhaps, but not trouble the Comitia Plebis more.

Di te mihi semper servent.

--- End forwarded message ---
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41067 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Apologies
---Oh I can hardly wait.

Pompeia



In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiuspopilliuslaenas"
<gaiuspopillius@g...> wrote:
>
> A private message to Pompeia Strabo may have been posted here. It
was
> my error.
>
> Valete,
>
> Laenas
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41068 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Fwd: ELECTIONS - PLEBS - convening of the Comitia Plebis Tribu
M. Hortensia Senatrice P. Strabonis spd;
at last a voice of sense in this absurdity. Thank you Senatrix
Strabo as I thanked you at 2 a.m when Albucius started this mess. He
also did not have either the kindness or the will to inform me that my
candidacy was not on the CPT list nor that all of the tribunes had
forgotten to post to convene the elections.

Instead of issuing the edictum and trying to end the election he could
have searched by speaking with others for a workable solution.
Certainly you Senatrix and A. Apollonius Cordus and M. Moravius
Piscinus turned your minds to a sensible and productive discussion and
resolution that does not leave Nova Roma without plebeian magistrates.

If everyone reads both Cordus's and Piscinus's posts there is ample
legal theory to justify the election, which is why I was so cavalier
over the technicalities of the veto - it doesn't matter!

Senatrix, I no more wish to remain a moment longer as tribune than I
wish to see Consul Laenas's unknown 'plans'. I fully expect if the
election returns are not declared in time a joint declaration of you
and Gaius Buteo Modianus as our new Consuls, anything else is
appalling.

Please if anything shows that this time of year is impossible to hold
elections I believe this mess is.
vale
Marca Hortensia Maior TRP (2005)

>
> At any rate, we can't reconvene the elections...we don't have the
> hands, the Plebs have spoken..the only thing was that the convention
> was not formally declared, although the cista was open, and rather
> visible to those who voted in the other two comitia...but again,
> that is the personal opinion of this patrician and not intended to
> meddle with the plebs.
>
> Yours in mutual potesteslessness :)
>
> Po
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41069 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: the Senate's proposal
M. Hortensia Plebibus spd;
I came in and just read, this was posted at 9:41 pm Friday that
Consul Laenas proposes that the senate designate Cinninatus Augur as
interrex to declare the election results.

vale
M. Hortensia Maior TRP (2005)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41070 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Fwd: Re: [CPT] [Nova-Roma] Re: ELECTIONS -
M. Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
> this is the relevant argument from both plebeians Cordus and
future tribune Piscinus.
So we will proceed without this nonsense. I'm pretty appalled
that Paulinus hasn't even bothered to read this! And you expect to
be praetor?
valete
Marca Hortensia Maior TRP (2005)

& getting pretty tired of these last minute theatricals, where is
tribune Albucius to have ended this sensibly.

> I think we can suppose here that the voice of the
> people has been
> heard to affirm the candidates into the plebeian
> offices. No
> formalities or legalistic arguments can preclude
> what the people
> have already expressed. Such an affirmation amounts
> to a
> consecratio. The current tribuni need only to
> confirm that the
> previous vote was a consecratio by affirmation. It
> wouldn't be the
> first time that tribuni took office under such
> circumstance. Indeed
> the first tribuni were conscrated on the Mons Sacer
> by affirmation
> of the pebes.

Certainly: and I hope you were not suggesting that I
or anyone else have tried to use "formalities or
legalistic arguments" to "preclude what the people
have already expressed". Quite the opposite. My
suggestion was to use a technical legal argument to
explain why the outcome of the election should be
regarded as valid after all; yours is to use a
technical sacral argument to do the same. In any case
we can agree about the outcome. As often in Roman
history, religious and constitutional law operate
along similar lines. :)



___________________________________________________________
NEW Yahoo! Cars - sell your car and browse thousands of new and used
cars online! http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/

--- End forwarded message ---
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41071 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal
Salve Tribuna,

Please report accurately. The senate has been called into emergency
session by Consul Laenas. The question is whether to appoint an
Interrex *in the event* that no election results have been posted by
midnight, 31 Dec, when the terms of the current consuls expire.

Vale,

-- Marinus

Maior wrote:

> M. Hortensia Plebibus spd;
> I came in and just read, this was posted at 9:41 pm Friday that
> Consul Laenas proposes that the senate designate Cinninatus Augur as
> interrex to declare the election results.
>
> vale
> M. Hortensia Maior TRP (2005)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41072 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal
Ex Officio M. Hortensia Maior;
Intercessio! I am vetoing the Senate's emergency
Senatus Consultum called this evening by Consul Laenas. .
The interrex is only to call NEW ELECTIONS in the case of vacant
consuls. This is NOT the case.
The Consuls are present & enough centuries , as Senator Octavius who
is assisting the webmaster in vote processing has pointed out, are in
to call the election in favour of Senatrix Strabo and Pontiff Modianus
to be considered Consuls. The Plebeians have voted. There is no
emergency, just a delay.
This entire meeting is constitutionally illegal
and totally unecessary!!

Marca Hortensia Maior Tribunus Plebis 2758


>
> Salve Tribuna,
>
> Please report accurately. The senate has been called into emergency
> session by Consul Laenas. The question is whether to appoint an
> Interrex *in the event* that no election results have been posted by
> midnight, 31 Dec, when the terms of the current consuls expire.
>
> Vale,
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41073 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal - INTERCESSIO!!!!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> Ex Officio M. Hortensia Maior;
> Intercessio! I am vetoing the Senate's emergency
> Senatus Consultum called this evening by Consul Laenas. .
> The interrex is only to call NEW ELECTIONS in the case of
vacant
> consuls. This is NOT the case.
> The Consuls are present & enough centuries , as Senator Octavius
who
> is assisting the webmaster in vote processing has pointed out, are
in
> to call the election in favour of Senatrix Strabo and Pontiff
Modianus
> to be considered Consuls. The Plebeians have voted. There is no
> emergency, just a delay.
> This entire meeting is constitutionally
illegal
> and totally unecessary!!
>
> Marca Hortensia Maior Tribunus Plebis 2758
>
>
> >
> > Salve Tribuna,
> >
> > Please report accurately. The senate has been called into
emergency
> > session by Consul Laenas. The question is whether to appoint an
> > Interrex *in the event* that no election results have been
posted by
> > midnight, 31 Dec, when the terms of the current consuls expire.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41074 From: rory kirshner Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: the Senate's proposal - INTERCESSIO!!!
Maior <rory12001@...> wrote: --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" wrote:

Ex Officio M. Hortensia Maior;
Intercessio! I am vetoing the Senate's emergency
Senatus Consultum called this evening by Consul Laenas. .
The interrex is only to call NEW ELECTIONS in the case of
vacant
consuls. This is NOT the case.
The Consuls are present & enough centuries , as Senator Octavius who
is assisting the webmaster in vote processing has pointed out, are
in
to call the election in favour of Senatrix Strabo and Pontiff
Modianus
to be considered Consuls. The Plebeians have voted. There is no
emergency, just a delay.
This entire meeting is constitutionally illegal
and totally unecessary!!

Marca Hortensia Maior Tribunus Plebis 2758


>
> Salve Tribuna,
>
> Please report accurately. The senate has been called into
emergency
> session by Consul Laenas. The question is whether to appoint an
> Interrex *in the event* that no election results have been posted
by
> midnight, 31 Dec, when the terms of the current consuls expire.
>
> Vale,
>
>

--- End forwarded message ---







__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41075 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal
Salve Hortensia,

Didn't you just lay down your tribunician sanctitas earlier this
evening? How can you pronounce intercessio now?

In any case, I recommend you make your arguments in the Senate.

Vale,

-- Marinus

Maior wrote:

> Ex Officio M. Hortensia Maior;
> Intercessio! I am vetoing the Senate's emergency
> Senatus Consultum called this evening by Consul Laenas. .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41076 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-30
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal
Salve Censor;
what on earth makes you say such a thing? I did not such thing,
I signed my posts TRP (2005) and that is what I am.

when the new tribunes are called then my terms is over not before.
I'm not arguing anything in the Senate.You will stop your vote right
now. When the tribunes in Europe wake up and tomorrow in full view
of all the cives we can discuss this. Not before
I am not a party to midnight actions involving such an
abomination as an interrex.
vale
Marca Hortensia Maior TRP



> Salve Hortensia,
>
> Didn't you just lay down your tribunician sanctitas earlier this
> evening? How can you pronounce intercessio now?
>
> In any case, I recommend you make your arguments in the Senate.
>
> Vale,
>
> -- Marinus
>
> Maior wrote:
>
> > Ex Officio M. Hortensia Maior;
> > Intercessio! I am vetoing the Senate's emergency
> > Senatus Consultum called this evening by Consul Laenas. .
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41077 From: Paolo Eutimo Cristiano Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Magna Mater website
auguries
happiest 2006
I hope Goddess Magna Mater protect us ..
I am Goddess mater magna follower..
Vale amici et frater roman


Sono felice di AVERE FATTO LA VOSTRA CONOSCENZA ......dentro di voi
scorre sangue Romano ONORE FRATELLI CHE IL 2006 SIA PIENO DI
SUCCESSO E GLORIA
VALE
PAULUS SCIPIO EUTIMO Legionario gladiatore
www.arsdimicandi.net
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41078 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal
Salve M. Hortensia Maior

Who said in part...

"when the new tribunes are called then my terms is over not before."

From the constitution of Nova Roma

"Tribuni Plebis (Tribune of the Plebs). Five tribunes of the plebs
shall be elected by the comitia plebis tributa to serve a term
lasting one year."

Your term expires at midnight, Roman Time, on December 31 2758
whether or not there are newly elected tribunes to take over for
you.

" a term lasting one year."

As to my needing to pick up a history book I always do for there is
so little time and so many books.

It would be nice if you would pick up a copy of the laws and the
constitution of Nova Roma and read them and stop making it up as you
go.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

"Books are the carriers of civilization.
Without books, history is silent, literature dumb,
science crippled, thought and speculation at a standstill."
Barbara Tuchman




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> Salve Censor;
> what on earth makes you say such a thing? I did not such
thing,
> I signed my posts TRP (2005) and that is what I am.
>
> when the new tribunes are called then my terms is over not before.
> I'm not arguing anything in the Senate.You will stop your vote
right
> now. When the tribunes in Europe wake up and tomorrow in full view
> of all the cives we can discuss this. Not before
> I am not a party to midnight actions involving such an
> abomination as an interrex.
> vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior TRP
>
>
>
> > Salve Hortensia,
> >
> > Didn't you just lay down your tribunician sanctitas earlier this
> > evening? How can you pronounce intercessio now?
> >
> > In any case, I recommend you make your arguments in the Senate.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > -- Marinus
> >
> > Maior wrote:
> >
> > > Ex Officio M. Hortensia Maior;
> > > Intercessio! I am vetoing the Senate's
emergency
> > > Senatus Consultum called this evening by Consul Laenas. .
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41079 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Fwd: Re: [CPT] [Nova-Roma] Re: ELECTIONS - convening of the Comiti
M. Hortensia Galerio Paulino salutem dicit:
read the below. This is also from the M. Moravius Piscinus-
A. Apollonius Cordus discussion over at the CPT, which you resolutely
are not reading or following.

Cordus gave the course on Roman Law at Academia Thules. M. Moravius
Piscinus our future tribune took the course & is very expert on the
religio.

There are better things to do than quibble with me. Look to the
plebeian elections & those of the consules!
Marca Hortensia Maior TRP

"There is another ancient law that makes sacer anyone
> > who would have
> > the plebes become left without tribuni."
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41080 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: DE TABVLARIO
A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus omnibus S.P.D.

I trust that neither Praetor Perusianus nor anyone else will object to
my passing along a little information on the Tabularium project.

I have completed preliminary correction of all the laws in and around
the English language section of the Tabularium. Virtually all of these have
been uploaded by our excellent and diligent webmaster, C. Minucius Scaeuola.
The revised titles are in the index and on the law texts, and, with luck,
all errors have been corrected. This is not to say that everything is
perfect, for in the press of continuing the corrections, I have not had time
to review the laws which have been uploaded; one's eyes do fail after
looking after page upon page of unfamiliar HTML-coded text, and the index is
a work in progress. However, they are a vast improvement over the situation
I found, and hope that this work will be beneficial to the quirites.

There is an outside chance that I will be able to sort out the remaining
laws in Latin, and, with some assistance, put them where they can be
accessed easily by those who prefer the language of our Roman ancestors.

We may not have magistrates, but we do have laws...

Valete,

A. Tullia Scholastica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41081 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: A nonv veto veto
Salve Tiberius Paulinus

> Yes you did attempt to veto his edict (post # 40928 ) and it was pointed
> out to you , by former Tribune Diana Octavia Aventina (post #40930) that
> because you had not followed the law in terms of form and content your veto
> was null and void the moment you posted it.

Thank you. I can assure you, I'm trying to have my collegue understand
the very simple concept you just outlined, but so far I wasn't
succesful, crashing against the wall of the two oh so strong arguments
of "The people has spoken, everything is fine" and "Cordus said it's
right how I did". I just posted a mail over the tribunes list to
officially give up my attempt of making her unerstand, peraphs you
will manage to, I don't know.

Now, besides that, my own problem right now is that with one collegue
that is so firmly satisfied that the elections have happened and
everything is correct (despite the obvious irregularities), I cannot
call for new elections wihtout being more or less sue of being vetoed.

At the same time, I can't seem to reach Albucius these days, altho I
tried either via mailin glists and private mail, neither to have his
consent to the "Tribunes lending power to the Magister Aerenarius
fictio" solution (to which I'm not against in principle) nor to have a
backup for calling new elections, if so he feels inclined to.

Now, this is the current situation. I'll add more about the news from
the Senate later.

Vale,

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis Iterum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41082 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Fwd: Re: [CPT] [Nova-Roma] Re: ELECTIONS - convening of the Comiti
Salve Marca Hortensia Maior

"There is another ancient law that makes sacer anyone
who would have the plebes become left without tribuni."

But I am not one of four tribunes ( the other being vacant) who did
not call the CPT to hold legal elections and so leave the plebes
without tribuni. BTW I am reading the CPT list and have responded to
what you wrote on this list.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia Galerio Paulino salutem dicit:
> read the below. This is also from the M. Moravius
Piscinus-
> A. Apollonius Cordus discussion over at the CPT, which you
resolutely
> are not reading or following.
>
> Cordus gave the course on Roman Law at Academia Thules. M.
Moravius
> Piscinus our future tribune took the course & is very expert on
the
> religio.
>
> There are better things to do than quibble with me. Look to the
> plebeian elections & those of the consules!
> Marca Hortensia Maior TRP
>
> "There is another ancient law that makes sacer anyone
> > > who would have
> > > the plebes become left without tribuni."
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41083 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal
Salve

"Tribuni Plebis (Tribune of the Plebs). Five tribunes of the plebs
> shall be elected by the comitia plebis tributa to serve a term
> lasting one year."
>
> Your term expires at midnight, Roman Time, on December 31 2758
> whether or not there are newly elected tribunes to take over for
> you.
>

Point. But she can indeed veto the call for the senate session untill that
moment, meaning the senate shouldn't be allowed to discuss the subject
untill midnight an done minute. But then the present consuls as well will
have no power anymore to convene the senate.

Now, personally, my opinion is that if we would all calm down a moment, we'd
be all much better.

Again personally, I think, being that at least the elections in the CPoT and
CC have taken place regularly and we just need the vote count to be
finished, simple common sense would suggest that a few days of de facto
prorogatio of the current magistrates would be a better and less painful
solution than last minutes, under the fireworks, senate sessions and their
consequences.

Just my two cents. (happy new year, btw)

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis Iterum


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41084 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: DE TABVLARIO
Salve A. Tullia Scholastica

Thank you for your efforts. As one who spends considerable time in
the Tabularium your work has not gone unnoticed . It is an immense
undertaking and I thank you again for doing it.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
<fororom@l...> wrote:
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus omnibus S.P.D.
>
> I trust that neither Praetor Perusianus nor anyone else will
object to
> my passing along a little information on the Tabularium project.
>
> I have completed preliminary correction of all the laws in and
around
> the English language section of the Tabularium. Virtually all of
these have
> been uploaded by our excellent and diligent webmaster, C. Minucius
Scaeuola.
> The revised titles are in the index and on the law texts, and,
with luck,
> all errors have been corrected. This is not to say that
everything is
> perfect, for in the press of continuing the corrections, I have
not had time
> to review the laws which have been uploaded; one's eyes do fail
after
> looking after page upon page of unfamiliar HTML-coded text, and
the index is
> a work in progress. However, they are a vast improvement over the
situation
> I found, and hope that this work will be beneficial to the
quirites.
>
> There is an outside chance that I will be able to sort out the
remaining
> laws in Latin, and, with some assistance, put them where they can
be
> accessed easily by those who prefer the language of our Roman
ancestors.
>
> We may not have magistrates, but we do have laws...
>
> Valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41085 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal
Salve Tribune

Happy new year to you also. May you and yours have a safe,
productive and a very happy new year.


vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
<dom.con.fus@g...> wrote:
>
> Salve
>
> "Tribuni Plebis (Tribune of the Plebs). Five tribunes of the plebs
> > shall be elected by the comitia plebis tributa to serve a term
> > lasting one year."
> >
> > Your term expires at midnight, Roman Time, on December 31 2758
> > whether or not there are newly elected tribunes to take over for
> > you.
> >
>
> Point. But she can indeed veto the call for the senate session
untill that
> moment, meaning the senate shouldn't be allowed to discuss the
subject
> untill midnight an done minute. But then the present consuls as
well will
> have no power anymore to convene the senate.
>
> Now, personally, my opinion is that if we would all calm down a
moment, we'd
> be all much better.
>
> Again personally, I think, being that at least the elections in
the CPoT and
> CC have taken place regularly and we just need the vote count to be
> finished, simple common sense would suggest that a few days of de
facto
> prorogatio of the current magistrates would be a better and less
painful
> solution than last minutes, under the fireworks, senate sessions
and their
> consequences.
>
> Just my two cents. (happy new year, btw)
>
> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
>
> Founder of Gens Constantinia
> Tribunus Plebis
> Aedilis Urbis Iterum
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41086 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: And Finally, about Albucius Call for elections and how o get out of
And finally, one note about Albucius's call for elections and how to
get out of the stall.

Yes, Albucius' call for elections was flawed, probably. Yes, the
timing was probably ill chosen. Yes, it was probably vetoable in
several ways (apparently it's becoming a sport to find new reasons
lately).

But it remains the fact that it was not vetoed (Maior's attempt was,
as I think fully demonstrated by othrs already, void of any legality)
within the 72 hours from the edictum, and thus the elections should
had taken place. I actually expected Albucius to carry them over. I
can only suspect he was either distracted by Maior's non-veto or just
got so fed up that he just left (I cannot seem o reach him since then)
and, truly, by now I would fully understand and justify him for that.
Incidntally, despite the whole thing is quite pointless considering he
called for elections for a date that has already passed.

Maior liked to quote the law that made sacer the one who prevented the
plebs to have its Tribuni, but by illegally trying to stop the process
Albucius had started (and **possibly** eventually, even if indirectly,
suceeding in that), she should realize she might arguably be
considered that one... above and together with the other 4 tribunes,
me included of course, who created the problem in the first place.

So, while I happily put at anyone's diposal my virtual head if the
Collegium Pontificum (or whoever in charge for such decision) will
deem us responsible enough to declare all of us sacer, I will spend my
possibly last hours as Tribunus to say that throwing around the blame
is quite pointless and that we could much more happily try to get out
of the situation without raising even more noise and bruising more
egos (a thing, this latter, that I find of underestimated and long
lasting consequence in Nova Roma).

Now, my practical suggestions are:

1) all tribunes agreeing (I know, call me a evil plotter, as someone
already did on this list, but for taking such a decision I'd reall
ylike a consensus about the tribunes), we could go for the fictio
Cordus proposed about the magister aerenarius

or

2) after the effective end of the term, meaning tomorrow, a
senatusconsultum that declares all the candidates to that given
election elected. It's unorthodox, I know, but keep in mind that the
practical results, considering we have as many (for tribunes) or less
(for aedilis) candidates than positions available, would be exactly
the same as calling new elections with th sam candidates (BUT, it is
to be considered that, theoretically, calling new elections new
candidates might decide to run for the positions).

See the good side of all this story, at least no one has yet asked for
a Dictator to be installed... in the last two years asking for that
seemed the usual routine whenever anything, included too heated
discussions over the mailing list, happened. At least in that regards,
we are improving.

Again, just my two euro cents.

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis
Aedilis Urbis Iterum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41087 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal
C. Equitius Cato M. Hortensiae Maori quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Tribune, once again you have failed to follow the simple guidelines
for a tribunician veto as laid down by Nova Roman law, and so this new
intercessio is, like the last one, null, void, and legally non-existent.

I really don't care what Apollonius Cordus or Moravius Piscinus or
anyone else says in their discussion on the CPT List or any other
List; if an activity violates Nova Roman law, it is illegal. No
argumentum ad auctoritatem is sufficient reason to violate the law.

The business of the Republic is my business, whether Plebeian or
Patrician; the law is the law no matter what class or tribe or century
a citizen belongs to. I find it highly offensive that you would be
(in your own word) so "cavalier" with the law and then rebuke other
citizens for pointing out the illegality of such an action. It is
exactly this kind of cavalier view of the law which has put us in the
position we are in now.

Perhaps the details of the law are not important to you. If you were
acting and living in a bubble cut off from the rest of the Republic,
you might be able to live according to your own private view of the
law, and all would be as you would like it. But you in fact live in
the Republic with all of us, and you are bound by and answerable to
the same law.

To give you an example, if you walked into City Hall and demanded to
get married but had no marriage license, the City of New York would
not allow you to get married. You can show historical reasons why you
should be considered married; you can quote great artists,
politicians, academicians, philosophers, playwrites, &c. until you are
blue in the face; you can appeal to the emotional bond you have with
your betrothed; you can do anything you like, but if you do not have a
marriage license you cannot get married, and any attempt to bully your
way past the requirements of the law is not only foolish but
ultimately useless.

Once again --- you have not vetoed anything, tribune.

Vale et valete.

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@y...> wrote:
>
> Ex Officio M. Hortensia Maior;
> Intercessio! I am vetoing the Senate's emergency
> Senatus Consultum called this evening by Consul Laenas. .
> The interrex is only to call NEW ELECTIONS in the case of vacant
> consuls. This is NOT the case.
> The Consuls are present & enough centuries , as Senator Octavius who
> is assisting the webmaster in vote processing has pointed out, are in
> to call the election in favour of Senatrix Strabo and Pontiff Modianus
> to be considered Consuls. The Plebeians have voted. There is no
> emergency, just a delay.
> This entire meeting is constitutionally illegal
> and totally unecessary!!
>
> Marca Hortensia Maior Tribunus Plebis 2758
>
>
> >
> > Salve Tribuna,
> >
> > Please report accurately. The senate has been called into emergency
> > session by Consul Laenas. The question is whether to appoint an
> > Interrex *in the event* that no election results have been posted by
> > midnight, 31 Dec, when the terms of the current consuls expire.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41088 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: prid. Kal. Ian.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est pridie Kalendas Ianuarius; haec dies comitialis est.


"What happened after his departure creates still greater difficulty
for most historians. For some, after they have brought him as far as
Thrace, say he died there; of this number are Cephalon of GergisLink
to the editor's note at the bottom of this page and Hegesippus,Link to
the editor's note at the bottom of this page who wrote concerning
Pallenê, both of them ancient and reputable men. Others make him leave
Thrace and take him to Arcadia, and say that he lived in the Arcadian
Orchomenus, in a place which, though situated inland, yet by reason of
marshes and a river, is called Nesos or "Island"; and they add that
the town called Capyae was built by Aeneas and the Trojans and took
its name from Capys the Troan. This is the account given by various
other writers and by Ariaethus, the author of Arcadica. And there are
some who have the story that he came, indeed, to Arcadia and yet that
his death did not occur there, but in Italy; this is stated by many
others and especially by Agathyllus of Arcadia, the poet, who writes
thus in an elegy:

'Then to Arcadia came and in Nesos left his two daughters,
Fruit of his love for Anthemone fair and for lovely Codone;
Thence made haste to Hesperia's land and begat there male offspring,
Romulus named.'

The arrival of Aeneas and the Trojans in Italy is attested by all the
Romans and evidences of it are to be seen in the ceremonies observed
by them both in their sacrifices and festivals, as well as in the
Sibyl's utterances, in the Pythian oracles, and in many other things,
which none ought to disdain as invented for the sake of embellishment.
Among the Greeks, also, many distinct monuments remain to this day on
the coasts where they landed and among the people with whom they
tarried when detained by unfavourable weather. In mentioning these,
though they are numerous, I shall be as brief as possible. They first
went to Thrace and landed on the peninsula called Pallene. It was
inhabited, as I have said,Link to the editor's note at the bottom of
this page by barbarians called Crusaeans, who offered them a safe
refuge. There they stayed the winter season and built a temple to
Aphrodite on one of the promontories, and also a city called Aeneia,
where they left all those who from fatigue were unable to continue the
voyage and all who chose to remain there as in a country they were
henceforth to look upon as their own. This city existed down to that
period of the Macedonian rule which came into being under the
successors of Alexander, but it was destroyed in the reign of
Cassander, when Thessalonica was being founded; and the inhabitants of
Aeneia with many others removed to the newly-built city." - Dionyisius
of Halicarnassus 1.49


"Play a thin tune
on a paper horn.
Old is dying.
New is born.

Scatter confetti
over the floor.
Sweep an old year
Out the door.

Blow up a wish
in a bright balloon.
Whisper dreams
To a midnight moon.

Play a loud tune
on a paper horn.
Old is dying.
New is born." - Myra Cohn Livingston

"Ring out the old shapes of foul disease;
Ring out the narrowing lusts of gold;
Ring out the thousand wars of old;
Ring in the thousand years of peace." - Alfred, Lord Tennyson

Today is the celebration of welcoming in the New Year, A.D. 2006 or
2759 A.U.C. The celebration of New Year's Eve is ancient, as well as
many of the customs associated with it. Babylonian records 4000 years
old describe resolutions made publicly; the two most common are to
repay any outstanding debts and to return anything that was borrowed.
Today, the two most common are to give up smoking and to lose weight
--- followed by repaying any outstanding debts and returning anything
that was borrowed. The Greeks and Romans all paraded the first babies
born in the new year, but the custom of wrapping a banner around one
of them with the number of the new year is from 15th century Germany.

The Roman civil calendar began on the Kalends of Martias --- in
exactly the same way that the U.S. Government begins its fiscal year
on 1 August --- but from every Roman calendar that has been found it
is clear that the astronomical (and psychological) year began on the
Kalends of Ianuarius.


Valete bene and Happy New Year!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41089 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: the Senate's proposal
Salvete all,

> Tribune, once again you have failed to follow the
> simple guidelines
> for a tribunician veto as laid down by Nova Roman
> law, and so this new
> intercessio is, like the last one, null, void, and
> legally non-existent.

Yup, that's right.

Honestly, the reason that I think the CPT elections
should be held over again is that I don't want the
Tribune's of 2006 to be haunted by this for the next
year. I've been around NR for a long time, and these
types of skeletons in the closet have a way of popping
out time and again. It is better to do it over,
getting it right this time and then moving on.

Valete,
Diana



__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41090 From: Cant97 Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Record Issue
Salvete, Omnes!



Si vales valeo!



I would like to thank Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus and Gn. Equitius Marinus
for helping me to clear up a problem with my citizenship. I was in Nova Roma
before as Iulia Modia, and when I cam back I saw that the gens was closed
and couldn't find any visible sign of my membership. I didn't realize my old
membership was still in the database, so I applied to join gens Galeria.
What fun, huh? When I screw up, I REALLY screw up!



I'm reading Nova Roma's laws so that this doesn't happen again. Fortunately
Gn. Equitius Marinus has been kind enough to change my record to reflect my
new name and gens. I am grateful.



Valete,



Gaia Galeria Aquila



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41091 From: David Kling Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Record Issue
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaiae Galeriae Aquilae salutem dicit

I am pleased that everything has worked out. Welcome back to Nova Roma. It
was good speaking with you again last night!

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 12/31/05, Cant97 <cant97@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete, Omnes!
>
>
>
> Si vales valeo!
>
>
>
> I would like to thank Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus and Gn. Equitius Marinus
> for helping me to clear up a problem with my citizenship. I was in Nova
> Roma
> before as Iulia Modia, and when I cam back I saw that the gens was closed
> and couldn't find any visible sign of my membership. I didn't realize my
> old
> membership was still in the database, so I applied to join gens Galeria.
> What fun, huh? When I screw up, I REALLY screw up!
>
>
>
> I'm reading Nova Roma's laws so that this doesn't happen again.
> Fortunately
> Gn. Equitius Marinus has been kind enough to change my record to reflect
> my
> new name and gens. I am grateful.
>
>
>
> Valete,
>
>
>
> Gaia Galeria Aquila


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41092 From: Cant97 Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Record Issue
Salve, Amice!



It was great talking to you as well! Hopefully we can get a Lacus Magni
get-together planned for when warm weather gets here, but that is of course
a discussion for the Lacus Magni list. Thank you for sending me the link to
it, by the way.



Optima Vale!



Gaia Galeria Aquila



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of David Kling
Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 7:27 AM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Record Issue



Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaiae Galeriae Aquilae salutem dicit

I am pleased that everything has worked out. Welcome back to Nova Roma. It
was good speaking with you again last night!

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 12/31/05, Cant97 <cant97@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete, Omnes!
>
>
>
> Si vales valeo!
>
>
>
> I would like to thank Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus and Gn. Equitius Marinus
> for helping me to clear up a problem with my citizenship. I was in Nova
> Roma
> before as Iulia Modia, and when I cam back I saw that the gens was closed
> and couldn't find any visible sign of my membership. I didn't realize my
> old
> membership was still in the database, so I applied to join gens Galeria.
> What fun, huh? When I screw up, I REALLY screw up!
>
>
>
> I'm reading Nova Roma's laws so that this doesn't happen again.
> Fortunately
> Gn. Equitius Marinus has been kind enough to change my record to reflect
> my
> new name and gens. I am grateful.
>
>
>
> Valete,
>
>
>
> Gaia Galeria Aquila


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




SPONSORED LINKS


Ancient
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=F
all+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&
s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ> history

Fall
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+his
tory&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+em
pire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA> of the roman empire

The
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient
+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roma
n+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ> fall of the roman empire


Roman
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall
+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=1
03&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw> empire







_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41093 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Record Issue
Salve my dear cousin Gaia Galeria Aquila

Welcome back!!!! You have been too long absent from Nova Roma and I
hope you will enjoy the next 40 or 50 years among us.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Cant97 <cant97@d...> wrote:
>
> Salvete, Omnes!
>
>
>
> Si vales valeo!
>
>
>
> I would like to thank Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus and Gn. Equitius
Marinus
> for helping me to clear up a problem with my citizenship. I was in
Nova Roma
> before as Iulia Modia, and when I cam back I saw that the gens was
closed
> and couldn't find any visible sign of my membership. I didn't
realize my old
> membership was still in the database, so I applied to join gens
Galeria.
> What fun, huh? When I screw up, I REALLY screw up!
>
>
>
> I'm reading Nova Roma's laws so that this doesn't happen again.
Fortunately
> Gn. Equitius Marinus has been kind enough to change my record to
reflect my
> new name and gens. I am grateful.
>
>
>
> Valete,
>
>
>
> Gaia Galeria Aquila
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41094 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: New Year - Ovid's Fasti
M. Lucretius Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.


Let us all take wise counsel from the words of Ovid, not only for this
day, but for each day.

Let us reflect before posting. Let us praise in public and chide
privately. Let us strive always to build our Res Publica. Let citizen
try to best citizen only in the display of virtues.


Book I: January 1: Kalends


See how Janus appears first in my song

To announce a happy year for you, Germanicus.

Two-headed Janus, source of the silently gliding year,

The only god who is able to see behind him,

Be favourable to the leaders, whose labours win

Peace for the fertile earth, peace for the seas:

Be favourable to the senate and Roman people,

And with a nod unbar the shining temples.

A prosperous day dawns: favour our thoughts and speech!

Let auspicious words be said on this auspicious day.

Let our ears be free of lawsuits then, and banish

Mad disputes now: you, malicious tongues, cease wagging!

See how the air shines with fragrant fire,

And Cilician grains crackle on lit hearths!

The flame beats brightly on the temple's gold,

And spreads a flickering light on the shrine's roof.

Spotless garments make their way to Tarpeian Heights,

And the crowd wear the colours of the festival:

Now the new rods and axes lead, new purple glows,

And the distinctive ivory chair feels fresh weight.

Heifers that grazed the grass on Faliscan plains,

Unbroken to the yoke, bow their necks to the axe.

When Jupiter watches the whole world from his hill,

Everything that he sees belongs to Rome.

Hail, day of joy, and return forever, happier still,

Worthy to be cherished by a race that rules the world.




Optime Valete!

Source: http://www.tkline.freeserve.co.uk/OvidFastiBkOne.htm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41095 From: FAC Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Magna Mater website
Salve Scipio Eutimo,

happy new year to you too. It's an honour for Nova Roma to welcome a
member of the excellent Federeation Ars Dimicandi. Please, semd my
greetings to your colleagues too.

Vale
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Consul


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Paolo Eutimo Cristiano"
<paolocristiano1966@y...> wrote:
>
> auguries
> happiest 2006
> I hope Goddess Magna Mater protect us ..
> I am Goddess mater magna follower..
> Vale amici et frater roman
>
>
> Sono felice di AVERE FATTO LA VOSTRA CONOSCENZA ......dentro di voi
> scorre sangue Romano ONORE FRATELLI CHE IL 2006 SIA PIENO DI
> SUCCESSO E GLORIA
> VALE
> PAULUS SCIPIO EUTIMO Legionario gladiatore
> www.arsdimicandi.net
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41096 From: FAC Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
salve Modianus,

> What is being done to correct this problem? What are the Consuls
doing? If
> the Consuls are doing nothing, what are the Praetors doing?

The Consules and the Praetores couldn't do anything about. I sent many
mails to Diribitores and Custodes but without answers. I received
just one message on dec 24th informing me that there would be a delay.
We couldn't do anything other than waiting for. Senators Germanicus
and caevola said us that the results are almoust ready and we have to
wait for some hours. I hope the magistrates will do it asap and in any
way the senatus is discussing abou as you know.

vale
fac
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41097 From: FAC Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Magna Mater website
Salvete Omnes,

I would officially thank Aedile Lucius Iulius Sulla and his staff for
the wonderful job done for the Magna Mater Project. The website is
very rich and the contents are very interesting. I hope
www.magnamaterproject.org would become an important informative source
about the Palatine hill and the cult of MM for all the academical,
public and private world.
I hope too that one of the new elected Aediles would continue the
wonderful job about this Project accomplished by the previous
magistrates and would improve it to the second step.

Thank you very much again, Sulla!

Valete
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41098 From: pjane Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
Because I believe that this sort of thing needs to be done with as little secrecy as possible, I
will post my views here as well as in the Senate. It is my believe that an Interregnum is not
necessary. There is no crisis in NR, just a staff overburdened by circumstance and an
unbelievably arcane vote-counting system.

I would prefer a solution -- whether it be a posting of the official election results or another
solution -- which allows the new Consules to take office immediately, but would support
prorogation of the current officers for no more than five days.

Patricia Cassia
Senatrix
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41099 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: De interrege
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

A few quick notes.

The appointment of an interrex by the senate is, from
a historical point of view, absolutely the correct
procedure in case of the absence of higher
magistrates.

The problem is that our lex constitutiva has been
written without due care and attention, and it
therefore fails to cater for the possibility that it
might be necessary for an interrex to be appointed but
not to hold new elections. It would not have happened
in the old days, of course, when the results of an
election were given on the same day as the election.
But it can happen nowadays.

There is little doubt what the Romans would have done
in this situation. They would have appointed an
interrex to hold the fort until the results could be
announced. There were years in ancient times when
elections were so delayed that the old magistrates had
to leave office before their replacements had been
elected. The solution was to appoint an interrex.

I believe the lex constitutiva supports this course of
action. It doesn't explicitly say what to do when the
elections have been held but the year ends before the
results are announced. But it does say what to do if
for any reason there are no consules in office:
appoint an interrex. It's true that it also instructs
the interrex to "organize new elections in the comitia
centuriata to elect two new consuls". But I think this
must be interpreted loosely, as if it said "ensure
that two new consuls are elected". Why? I'll explain.

The lex constitutiva, in line with ancient tradition,
forbids the interrex to remain in office for longer
than five days. If by the end of those five days there
are no new consules, a new interrex must be appointed.
Now, we all know that it's impossible to conduct
elections from start to finish in five days. Common
sense requires at least that long for candidates to
announce themselves. Then the law requires five more
days between the announcement of the vote and the
beginning of voting. And then the voting itself takes
nine days at least. So from beginning to end the
process takes at least 19 days.

If we interpret the lex constitutiva strictly, and
insist that every new interrex must *start* to
organize elections, then every interrex would have to
leave office before the end of the elections and his
successor would have to start all over again from the
beginning - no election would ever get finished. So
the lex constitutiva obviously can't mean that. It
must mean simply that each interrex should pick up the
electoral process where his predecessor left off.

Therefore, if by the end of today we have no new
consules, an interrex should be appointed to *carry
on* the electoral process which has already been
started, just as if he were being appointed to follow
another interrex who had already begun that process.
The unclear wording of the lex constitutiva will not
require the interrex to abandon the elections we've
just had an hold new ones. He or she will simply have
to receive delivery of the results and announce them,
then step down.

There is no question of our current magistrates
remaining in office beyond the end of their proper
terms. This was never done in antiquity and it is
clearly prohibited by the lex constitutiva. Nor should
we resort to Domitius Constantinus' back-up plan of
having the senate prorogue all the current magistrates
until the results are announced. The senate has no
power under the lex constitutiva to prorogue any
magistrates other than provincial governors, and the
same was true in antiquity. The interrex is the
historical solution and the one which the lex
constitutiva clearly intends.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41100 From: pjane Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Vote of P. Cassia
On consideration I must vote ANTIQVO. There is no reason why the vote results for Consul
cannot be announced immediately, allowing the new officers to begin their admininstration
even as other elections are sorted out. Nor is there any reason why the current administration
should be rewarded for its failure to produce the one real result required: a set of election
results by midnight Dec. 31.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41101 From: pjane Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Question about this vote
Is there any provision in the Senate rules for an emergency vote such as this one now being
held? It seems to me that it does not meet the provisions given here:

http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2003-11-11-i.html

requiring a 24-hour notice period before convening the Senate and 96 hours of debate
before a vote can be held. Could anyone please enlighten me as to what basis there is for this
vote?

P. Cassia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41102 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
> Senators Germanicus and caevola said us that the results are almoust
> ready and we have to wait for some hours.

We thought we had everything counted over a week ago; but discovered
a problem while reviewing the results - some valid votes had been
tossed out due to a problem with the duplicate-finding mechanism.

This affected the races for Praetor and Tribune, but not for Consul.

[My original vote-counting program from 2001 doesn't work anymore
due to the many changes in the rules - though it still works fine
in very simple cases such as two candidates for two positions or two
candidates for one position).

Scaevola was then unable to continue due to an outside committment; and
I was no longer involved (being only the webmaster's assistant, and
not a Diribitor or Custos). Apparently the Diribitores went back
to the original pre-automation methods, and that tallying has taken
far longer than expected.

But the question of who will be Consul is not affected - both received
votes from well over half the centuries. You can announce that now
(if the custodes will simply confirm it), and let the new Consuls
announce the other results in a day or two.

Vale, Octavius.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41103 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
---Salve Patricia Cassia Senatrix et Salvete Omnes:

Thanks for posting your views. To add to your comments, I am
equally uncomfortable with an extension of current magistrates'
terms without a specific assigned timelimit, should this measure be
necessary. "Until the election results are determined' is hardly a
set period of time....after a mandated 5 days or so the issue
will 'have' to be revisited...and we can go from there.

I think to appoint unelected magistrates, which is what this year's
magistrates would be after midnight, appointed and not elected of
the people, without a set time limit is not legally or
constitutionally consistent...even a Dictator or an Interrex have
specific time limits to their appointments in the constitution...for
good reason.


"until the election results are determined' is a uncomfortably ill-
defined length of time... Additionally, it doesn't provide for any
timehonoured deadline for vote tallies and tie breaking, although I
truly appreciate very much the hard work of webmanagers, diribitores
and custodes.

And if a dispute should materialize (stranger things have happened)
over when it is appropriate for the current magistrates to stand
down or not to stand down, in favour of the new magistrates...any
rationale for a veto might be a challenge, as the time is so
illdefined.

I won't take a chance in voting on this solution without a set
timeframe....defined in minutes, hours or days.

Valete
Pompeia Minucia Tiberia Senatrix





In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pjane" <pjane@j...> wrote:
>
> Because I believe that this sort of thing needs to be done with as
little secrecy as possible, I
> will post my views here as well as in the Senate. It is my believe
that an Interregnum is not
> necessary. There is no crisis in NR, just a staff overburdened by
circumstance and an
> unbelievably arcane vote-counting system.
>
> I would prefer a solution -- whether it be a posting of the
official election results or another
> solution -- which allows the new Consules to take office
immediately, but would support
> prorogation of the current officers for no more than five days.
>
> Patricia Cassia
> Senatrix
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41104 From: James Mathews Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: New Year's Best Wishes
My Friends;

To all of those who I count as my friends that I have involved myself with in the last year:

I wish for you -- "The Very Best and Brightest NewYear Filled With Opportunity, Good Fortune, and Prosperity!!!!"

For those few with whom I have had conflict in this past year, I hope that in the new year we will be able to reach some sort of common ground and at least agree to disagree without rancor, or bad feeling. For those who feel it may be a worthy effort, I am open to any discussion in this matter.

Respectfully;

Jim Mathews (aka; Marcus Minucius Audens, and Ian, Ryan, and Brian McKay)



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41105 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: De concilio plebis
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

I'm not going to say anything about which veto was
valid and why and what not and who where when. All I'd
like to point out about that is that it's all a bit
daft. In antiquity a veto was a veto. It was valid
because a tribune said "veto" and that was that.

Rules saying that a veto is only valid if it contains
this or that is a nice idea, but it's unhistorical and
it doesn't work. It just creates further confusion
because no one then knows whether a given veto is
valid or not. We can have opinions, of course, but
again we come back to the old problem - who decides?
We can sit around for years saying "it's obviously
invalid", but neither you nor I have the legal power
to actually strike it down. And frankly if I were a
diribitor and an election had been vetoed I wouldn't
count the votes even if the validity of the veto were
questionable, because I wouldn't want to take the
risk. The result, therefore, is uncertainty. It's time
to completely revise and simplify the rule-book
concerning tribunician vetoes. Back to basics, back to
ancient practice.

But whether M. Hortensia's veto of P. Memmius' call
for a fresh election is not actually relevant to
whether the *original* plebejan elections are valid or
not. Two spearate ideas have been floated either of
which would allow those original elections to be
regarded as perfectly valid. The first was my
suggestion of a legal fiction that the magister
aranearius had conducted the elections with powers
delegated by the tribunes. The second, which I think
is actually better than my suggestion, is M. Moravius'
suggestion that we regard the plebejan elections as a
spontaneous an unorganized expression of the will of
the plebs by acclamation. This has historical
precedent since it was the way the first tribunes were
elected: the plebs just got together and said "hey,
let's have some tribunes!".

The alternative, as P. Memmius and Diana Octavia have
said, is to hold fresh elections to avoid any
uncertainty. The problem with this is that when the
tribunes lay down their office at the end of today
there will be no one with the legal authority to
convene new plebejan elections. So I'm not sure that's
going to help us a great deal.

I don't see any reason why the diribitores and
custodes shouldn't go ahead and count the votes,
anyway. I know it's tedious for them and would be very
frustrating if they were to count them all and then
later have the results declared invalid, but really
once the votes have been cast they should be counted.
Even if the elections were invalid, the results should
be known.

Nor do I think the tribunes and aediles plebis elected
in those elections should worry about having their
legitimacy questioned. Neither election was contested,
and there is no such thing as 'senior' and 'junior'
positions in the tribunate - all tribunes are totally
equal. Nobody has been jumping up and demanding fresh
elections. We all recognize that the outcome of the
original elections will represent the will of the
plebs.

So let's not worry too much about it. There are two
possible ways to get past the technical objections to
the validity of the elections, and either or both will
do the trick. The outcome is not seriously disputed.
It'll be fine.



___________________________________________________________
NEW Yahoo! Cars - sell your car and browse thousands of new and used cars online! http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41106 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: De interrege - P.S.
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

One last thing - I honestly don't know why some people
have the idea that appointing an interrex should only
be done if there's a crisis. It's absolute rubbish.
The appointment of an interrex is quite simply the
proper thing to do when there are no consules. No
consules = interrex. If a vase falls, you catch it. If
your alarm clock goes off, you get up. If there are no
consules, you appoint an interrex.

If we can get new consules designati before midnight
tonight, great. But if not, the only proper thing to
do is to appoint an interrex. It's that simple.



___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Exclusive Xmas Game, help Santa with his celebrity party - http://santas-christmas-party.yahoo.net/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41107 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: A Happy New Year from Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Censor!
Salvete Quirites!

It has been a pleasure to serve as Censor to the Res Publica. It is
no secret that the tasks of the Censor are more than demanding, but
if one has any ambitions, that is how it is.

I have had the privilege to be able to supervise the entrance of many
new citizens and I hereby extend a special Happy New Year to the new
citizens of this year!

The work with the "name reform" and all connected issues has given me
great satisfaction, I am very happy to see more and more Nova Roman
citizens having correct Roman names. Anyone who would like to get an
idea about my work as a Censor during the two last years are welcome
to take a look at the three Censorial General Reports, the Census
Report and the "Domus project" to be found on the Nova Roma web-site.

I will thank the Rogatores and my Scribae separately for their
splendid work, but I will end my New years thanks with thanking my
former colleague Marcus Octavius Germanicus and my present colleague
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus for our good cooperation.

Within less than six hours I will be a privatus for the first time in
five years. Next year I will dedicate my time in Nova Roma to the
Academia Thules and the Senate of Nova Roma. Further I look forward
to next year's Conventus at the Hadrian wall where I expect to meet a
lot of Nova Romans. See You at the Wall!

A Happy New Year to all Quirites!

Until next! ;-)
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFBQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41108 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: [none]
A. Apollonius M. Flavio omnibusque sal.

> Salvete Omnes, can anyone tell me how to say
> struggle
> and disappointment in Latin? Thanks.

I'd say "certamen dolorque" or "certamen et spes depulsa".



___________________________________________________________
NEW Yahoo! Cars - sell your car and browse thousands of new and used cars online! http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41109 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Question about this vote
Salve Patricia Cassia, et salvete quirites,

pjane wrote:
> Is there any provision in the Senate rules for an emergency
> vote such as this one now being held?

Only in the sense that it's been done before in Nova Roma and during
antiquity.

> It seems to me that it does not meet the provisions given here:
>
> http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2003-11-11-i.html

I see what you mean. That senatus consultum establishes rules for
senate meetings, but makes no mention of emergency meetings.

> requiring a 24-hour notice period before convening the Senate
> and 96 hours of debate before a vote can be held.

Obviously in this case we don't have 24 hours, much less 96. Nor do we
yet even have a quorum, to judge from the very small number of senators
who've responded to the call.

> Could anyone please enlighten me as to what basis there is for this
> vote?

The underlying necessity is the need for continuity of our government.
After midnight in Rome tonight, I will be the only magistrate our
republic has unless the Senate enacts an emergency senatus consultum to
provide for something else. Should the Senate not do so, I will do my
best to insure that election results get posted as soon as possible,
once I can obtain them. But I'd rather not see it come to that.

Vale, et valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41110 From: Cant97 Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Record Issue
Salve, and thank you!



I hope to share much with you and the rest of the citizens here. This is
where I belong.



Carpe Diem!



Gaia Galeria Aquila



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Timothy P. Gallagher
Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 8:48 AM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Record Issue



Salve my dear cousin Gaia Galeria Aquila

Welcome back!!!! You have been too long absent from Nova Roma and I
hope you will enjoy the next 40 or 50 years among us.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Cant97 <cant97@d...> wrote:
>
> Salvete, Omnes!
>
>
>
> Si vales valeo!
>
>
>
> I would like to thank Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus and Gn. Equitius
Marinus
> for helping me to clear up a problem with my citizenship. I was in
Nova Roma
> before as Iulia Modia, and when I cam back I saw that the gens was
closed
> and couldn't find any visible sign of my membership. I didn't
realize my old
> membership was still in the database, so I applied to join gens
Galeria.
> What fun, huh? When I screw up, I REALLY screw up!
>
>
>
> I'm reading Nova Roma's laws so that this doesn't happen again.
Fortunately
> Gn. Equitius Marinus has been kind enough to change my record to
reflect my
> new name and gens. I am grateful.
>
>
>
> Valete,
>
>
>
> Gaia Galeria Aquila
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>







SPONSORED LINKS


Ancient
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=F
all+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&
s=103&.sig=fjrrfWGmNj-9VzE29-5RqQ> history

Fall
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient+his
tory&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+em
pire&c=4&s=103&.sig=o-616ER_E9HbAgY7S7bgGA> of the roman empire

The
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Ancient
+history&w2=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roma
n+empire&c=4&s=103&.sig=3ssQInnLWGqC1FVNATfGNQ> fall of the roman empire


Roman
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Fall
+of+the+roman+empire&w3=The+fall+of+the+roman+empire&w4=Roman+empire&c=4&s=1
03&.sig=JnsqrFDC8rUYfVpJVe3Qiw> empire







_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41111 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: A big Thanks to my Cohors Censoris CFBQ
Salvete Rogatores and Scribae!

I have had a wonderful Cohors (staff) during my two year's term as
Censor. I would like to write a book about each of You, but sadly
enough there is no time. All of You have done a splendid job, but I
want to especially mention the two Rogatores and former Scribae
Censoris Caius Moravius Laureatus Armoricus and Marca Martiana
Gangalia Marcella. Thank You, You have done a splendid work!

Below are all the Scribae that has served on my Cohors during my two years:

Marcus Flavius Philippus Conservatus
Vibia Ulpia Aestiva
Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia
Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis
Marcus Minicius Complutensis
Manius Constantinus Serapio
Lucius Rutilius Minervalis
Marca Hortensia Maior
Titus Octavius Salvius
Quintus Cassius Calvus
Annia Octavia Indagatrix
Marcus Arminius Maior
Gaius Modius Athanasius
Marcus Octavius Germanicus
Lucius Modius Kaelus
Gaia Flavia Aureliana
Quintus Fabius Allectus
Marcus Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
Aulus Apollonius Cordus
Marcus Antonius Biachius

I thank You all! You are the best!

From the bottom of my heart I wish You all a Happy New Year!
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Censor, Consularis et Senator
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Cohors Censoris CFBQ
http://www.hanenberg-media-webdesign.com/cohors/index_uk.htm
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41112 From: FAC Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Comitia Populi Centuriata - Results
Salvete Omnes,

the Diribitores and Custodes accomplished the counting of the votes,
the following are the results:

The final results of the vote are as follows:

For Consul, Round 1

C. Fabius Buteo Modianus carries 24 centuries. Pompeia Minucia-
Tiberia
Strabo carries 21 centuries, for a total of 45 voting centuries, and
requiring a minimum of 23 votes to be elected. Buteo meets the
requirement, with a total of 24 centuries, and is elected.

For Consul, Round 2

Pompeia Minucia-Tiberia Strabo carries 39 centuries, of the 39
voting
centuries, requiring a minimum of 20 votes to be elected. Pompeia
Minucia-Tiberia Strabo is elected with 39 centuries.


CONGRATULATIONS, C. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS AND POMPEIA MINUCIA
TIBERIA STRABO ARE THE NEW CONSULES.

---------------------------

For Censor, Round 1

Q. Fabius Maximus carries 10 centuries. C. Minucius Hadrianus Felix
carries 38 centuries, for a total of 48 centuries voting, with a
minimum
requirement of 25 centuries for election. Felix meets this
requirement
with 38 centuries, and is elected.

For Praetor, Round 1

C. Curius Saturninus carries 13 centuries. Ti. Galerius Paulinus
carries 19 centuries. C. Geminius Germanus carries no centuries.
T.
Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus carries 17 centuries, for a total of 49
centuries, and a minimum of 25 centuries needed for election. No
candidates meet this requirement, therefore the candidate with the
least
votes, Germanus, is eliminated.

For Praetor, Round 2

Again, a total of 49 centuries have cast votes, as there were no
centuries to distribute from the elimination of Germanus. Again, no
candidates meet the requirement of 25 centuries, therefore the
candidate
with the least centuries, C. Curius Saturninus, is eliminated.

For Praetor, Round 3

After distributing the votes, Ti. Galerius carries 22 centuries,
while
T. Octavius carries 26, for a total of 48 centuries, and a minimum
requirement of 25 for election. T. Octavius is the only candidate
to
meet this requirement, and he is elected.

For Praetor, Round 4

Ti. Galerius carries now 38 centuries, with there being now a total
of
38 voting centuries. Ti. Galerius is elected.

CONGRATULATIONS, T. OCTAVIUS PIUS AHENOBARBUS AND T. GALERIUS
PAULINUS ARE THE NEW PRAETORES.

-----------------------

On the First Constitutional Amendment, the centuries have voted the
following:

Yes [41]: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,
22,
23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41,
42,
43, 44, 48, 49, 50, 51

No [6]: 1, 7, 9, 21, 45, 47

The amendment passes in the Comitia Centuriata.

On the Second Constitutional Amendment, the centuries have voted the
following:

Yes [42]: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18,
19,
21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40,
41,
42, 43, 44, 47, 48, 49, 51

No [5]: 1, 15, 27, 45, 50

The amendment passes in the Comitia Centuriata.

On the Lex Apula de Assiduis et Capite Censis, the centuries have
voted
the following:

Yes [26]: 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 14, 16, 22, 24, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35,
36,
38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 47, 48, 49

No [21]: 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9*, 12*, 13*, 15, 17, 18, 19*, 21, 25*, 26,
27,
31, 37*, 45, 50, 51


The Lex passes in the Comitia Centuriata.

On the Lex Apula de Magistro Arenario, the centuries have voted the
following:

Yes [41]: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21,
22,
23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42,
43,
44, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51

No [6]: 1, 7, 8, 9, 33, 39

The Lex passes in the Comitia Centuriata.


Valete
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41113 From: FAC Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Comitia Populi Centuriata - Results
Salvete Omnes,

CONGRATULATIONS, C. MINUCIUS HADRIANUS FELIX IS THE NEW CENSOR

Valete
Fr. Apulus Caesar
Consul




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "FAC" <fraelov@y...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> the Diribitores and Custodes accomplished the counting of the
votes,
> the following are the results:
>
> The final results of the vote are as follows:
>
> For Consul, Round 1
>
> C. Fabius Buteo Modianus carries 24 centuries. Pompeia Minucia-
> Tiberia
> Strabo carries 21 centuries, for a total of 45 voting centuries,
and
> requiring a minimum of 23 votes to be elected. Buteo meets the
> requirement, with a total of 24 centuries, and is elected.
>
> For Consul, Round 2
>
> Pompeia Minucia-Tiberia Strabo carries 39 centuries, of the 39
> voting
> centuries, requiring a minimum of 20 votes to be elected. Pompeia
> Minucia-Tiberia Strabo is elected with 39 centuries.
>
>
> CONGRATULATIONS, C. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS AND POMPEIA MINUCIA
> TIBERIA STRABO ARE THE NEW CONSULES.
>
> ---------------------------
>
> For Censor, Round 1
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus carries 10 centuries. C. Minucius Hadrianus
Felix
> carries 38 centuries, for a total of 48 centuries voting, with a
> minimum
> requirement of 25 centuries for election. Felix meets this
> requirement
> with 38 centuries, and is elected.
>
> For Praetor, Round 1
>
> C. Curius Saturninus carries 13 centuries. Ti. Galerius Paulinus
> carries 19 centuries. C. Geminius Germanus carries no centuries.
> T.
> Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus carries 17 centuries, for a total of 49
> centuries, and a minimum of 25 centuries needed for election. No
> candidates meet this requirement, therefore the candidate with the
> least
> votes, Germanus, is eliminated.
>
> For Praetor, Round 2
>
> Again, a total of 49 centuries have cast votes, as there were no
> centuries to distribute from the elimination of Germanus. Again,
no
> candidates meet the requirement of 25 centuries, therefore the
> candidate
> with the least centuries, C. Curius Saturninus, is eliminated.
>
> For Praetor, Round 3
>
> After distributing the votes, Ti. Galerius carries 22 centuries,
> while
> T. Octavius carries 26, for a total of 48 centuries, and a minimum
> requirement of 25 for election. T. Octavius is the only candidate
> to
> meet this requirement, and he is elected.
>
> For Praetor, Round 4
>
> Ti. Galerius carries now 38 centuries, with there being now a
total
> of
> 38 voting centuries. Ti. Galerius is elected.
>
> CONGRATULATIONS, T. OCTAVIUS PIUS AHENOBARBUS AND T. GALERIUS
> PAULINUS ARE THE NEW PRAETORES.
>
> -----------------------
>
> On the First Constitutional Amendment, the centuries have voted
the
> following:
>
> Yes [41]: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,
19,
> 22,
> 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40,
41,
> 42,
> 43, 44, 48, 49, 50, 51
>
> No [6]: 1, 7, 9, 21, 45, 47
>
> The amendment passes in the Comitia Centuriata.
>
> On the Second Constitutional Amendment, the centuries have voted
the
> following:
>
> Yes [42]: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18,
> 19,
> 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39,
40,
> 41,
> 42, 43, 44, 47, 48, 49, 51
>
> No [5]: 1, 15, 27, 45, 50
>
> The amendment passes in the Comitia Centuriata.
>
> On the Lex Apula de Assiduis et Capite Censis, the centuries have
> voted
> the following:
>
> Yes [26]: 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 14, 16, 22, 24, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35,
> 36,
> 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 47, 48, 49
>
> No [21]: 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9*, 12*, 13*, 15, 17, 18, 19*, 21, 25*,
26,
> 27,
> 31, 37*, 45, 50, 51
>
>
> The Lex passes in the Comitia Centuriata.
>
> On the Lex Apula de Magistro Arenario, the centuries have voted
the
> following:
>
> Yes [41]: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,
21,
> 22,
> 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 41,
42,
> 43,
> 44, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51
>
> No [6]: 1, 7, 8, 9, 33, 39
>
> The Lex passes in the Comitia Centuriata.
>
>
> Valete
> Fr. Apulus Caesar
> Consul
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41114 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Congratulations to the newly elected!
Salvete quirites,

Please join me in congratulating our new

Censor: G. Minucius Hadrianus Felix
Consuls: G. Fabius Buteo Modianus and P. Minucia Tiberia
Praetors: Ti. Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus and Ti. Galerius Paulinus

I wish them the very best in their terms of office, and look forward to
their inauguration tomorrow.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41115 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Comitia Populi Centuriata - Results
M. Hortensia:
my deepest congratulations to Consules Buteo and Strabo & to
our new Censor Hadrianus.
may the gods favour Nova Roma!
M. Hortensia Maior
> >
> > CONGRATULATIONS, C. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS AND POMPEIA MINUCIA
> > TIBERIA STRABO ARE THE NEW CONSULES
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41116 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Thanks
Salve Romans

I want to extend my congratulations to our Consuls-elect C. Fabius
Buteo Modianus and Pompeia Minucia-Tiberia Strabo. Great things
are expected of them and I believe they will not fail us. I want to
thank Q. Fabius Maximus for his long years of work on behalf of the
Republic and to congratulate C. Minucius Hadrianus Felix on his
election as Censor.

To C. Curius Saturninus and C. Geminius Germanus I would like to
express my thanks for their willing to stand for office and for
waiting this long to learn what I know has to be disappointing
results.

To T. Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus my soon to be colleague I extend by
congratulation on his election and I pledge my honor to work with
him in a cooperative and productive manner and to always work for
the advancement of Nova Roma.

Finally I would like to thank the citizens of Nova Roma for the high
honor they have given me and as I said in the beginning of the
election I pledge on my honor to serve you well.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetor-Elect
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41117 From: Legion XXIV Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: [SodalitasMilitarium] New Year's Best Wishes
And, Likewise to You Noble Senator.

Gallio Velius Marsallas
Praefectus, Legion XXIV Media Atlantia
Tribunes Militaris - NovaRoma
----- Original Message -----
From: James Mathews
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com ; SodalitasMilitarium@yahoogroups.com ; LegioVIFerrata@yahoogroups.com ; TopogEng@... ; CivilWarEvents@... ; NMLHA@yahoogroups.com ; CTRevWar@yahoogroups.com ; Jmath669642reng@...
Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 11:12 AM
Subject: [SodalitasMilitarium] New Year's Best Wishes


My Friends;

To all of those who I count as my friends that I have involved myself with in the last year:

I wish for you -- "The Very Best and Brightest NewYear Filled With Opportunity, Good Fortune, and Prosperity!!!!"

For those few with whom I have had conflict in this past year, I hope that in the new year we will be able to reach some sort of common ground and at least agree to disagree without rancor, or bad feeling. For those who feel it may be a worthy effort, I am open to any discussion in this matter.

Respectfully;

Jim Mathews (aka; Marcus Minucius Audens, and Ian, Ryan, and Brian McKay)
---fills the white and rustling sail and bends the gallant mast; and bends the gallant mast my boys, while like the eagle free, our good ship starts, and flies, and leaves Old England on our lee!!!


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "SodalitasMilitarium" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
SodalitasMilitarium-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41118 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Congratulations to the newly elected!
Salvete Censor Marine et omnes!

I certainly will! Congratulations to Censor Hadrianus Felix, Consuls
G. Fabius Buteo and P. Municia Tiberia and Praetors T. Octavius Pius
and Tiberius Galerius Paulinus. Also a special thanks for choosing
to take on the responsibilities and serve Nova Roma and her citizens
over the next year!

Respectfully,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@c...> wrote:
>
> Salvete quirites,
>
> Please join me in congratulating our new
>
> Censor: G. Minucius Hadrianus Felix
> Consuls: G. Fabius Buteo Modianus and P. Minucia Tiberia
> Praetors: Ti. Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus and Ti. Galerius Paulinus
>
> I wish them the very best in their terms of office, and look
forward to
> their inauguration tomorrow.
>
> Valete,
>
> -- Marinus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41119 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Question about this vote
M. Hortensia G. Equitio Marino quiritibus spd;
Marine can you explain please how this came about?
Really it is absolutely mad to come up with an 'interrex' when we
have uncontested consuls and tribunes.
Didn't the Consuls realize the slowness of the counting,
Monday? Did they discuss alternatives in the Senate. As I had no
clue about the 'interrex' which I still think was a bad idea.

I am realy grateful to Senator Octavius Germanicus for making known
the count of the centuries, assuring we had consuls.This last minute
business is a very bad idea. Everyone was either out or asleep (in
Europe).
vale
M. Hortensia Maior

Obviously in this case we don't have 24 hours, much less 96. Nor
do we
> yet even have a quorum, to judge from the very small number of
senators
> who've responded to the call.
>
> > Could anyone please enlighten me as to what basis there is for
this
> > vote?
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41120 From: Susan Davis Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Election Results Need Posted
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "FAC" <fraelov@y...> wrote:
>
> I sent many
> mails to Diribitores and Custodes but without answers.

I received no such mail. To what address did you send it?

Claudia Iulia
Diribitrix
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41121 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: EDICTVM CENSORIVM DE ADLEGENDIS SENATORIBVS
Ex Officio

Censores Caeso Fabius Quintilianus Gnaeus Equitius Marinus salutem
plurimam quiritibus dicunt.

EDICTVM CENSORIVM DE ADLEGENDIS SENATORIBVS

I. E Paragrapho IV. A. 1. d. Constitutionis Novae Romae, censores
potestates Albi Senatori servandi habent.

I. According to Paragraph IV. A. 1. d. of the Constitution of Nova Roma,
the censores have the powers of maintaining the Album Senatorium.

II. E Paragrapho II, Legis Vediae Senatoriae, censoribus suo arbitratu
liceat aliquem aedilem curulem creatum vel gubernatorem provinciae
designatum munere suo sex menses ut minimum functum in Senatum legant.

II. According to Paragraph II of the Lex Vedia Senatoria, the censores
may, at their discretion, adlect to the Senate anyone elected curule
aedile or appointed governor of a province who has served at least six
months in those offices.

III. E Paragrapho I, Legis Arminiae Senatoriae, censoribus suo arbitratu
liceat aliquem aedilem plebis susceptum munus suum sex menses ut minimum
in Senatum legant.

III. According to Paragraph I of the Lex Arminia Senatoria, the censores
may, at their discretion, adlect to the Senate anyone elected aedilis
plebis six months after assuming office.

IV. Ergo nobis iure praecipuo praeditis cordi est horum Senatorum
novorum lectionem pronuntiare:

IV. Therefore it is our privilege and pleasure to announce the addition
of these new Senatores:

Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix (CENSOR elect)

Gaius Fabius Buteo Quintilianus (CONSUL elect)

Tiberius Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus (PRAETOR elect)

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus (PRAETOR elect)

Flavius Vedius Germanicus (DICTATOR: 1999-07-04 to 1999-08-01 CENSOR:
1998-03-01 to 1998-09-07 and 1999-07-05 to 2000-03-02 CONSUL: 1998-03-01
to 1998-09-07 and 2001-01-01 to 2001-12-31 PROCONSUL: 1998-03-01 to
1998-09-07 and 1999-07-05 to 2001-11-05)

Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix (PROPRAETOR: 2003-01-01 to 2004-03-12)

Marcus Bianchius Antonius (PROPRAETOR: 2002-07-03 to 2005-10-17)

Caius Curius Saturnius (PROPRAETOR: 2005-04-01 to current )

Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia (PROPRAETOR: 2005-04-01 to current )

Sextus Apollonius Scipio (PROPRAETOR: 2002-07-03 to 2004-03-12, and
2005-04-01 to current )

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (PROPRAETOR: 2004-03-12 to current )

Lucius Minicius Sceptius (PROPRAETOR: 2004-03-12 to 2004-12-21)

Praeter iura necessaria expleta eos aptos reddentia ut in Senatum
legantur, unusquisque eorum studium rarum Novae Romae exhibuit.

Each has, in addition to fulfilling the legal requirements making them
qualified for adlection into the Senate, demonstrated exceptional
dedication to Nova Roma.

V. Lucius Sicinius Drusus Albo Senatorum/Senatorio movetur.

V. Lucius Sicinius Drusus is hereby removed from the Album Senatorium.

Datum sub manibus nostris pridie Kal. IANVARIAS MMDCCLVIII a.u.c.

Given under our hands this 31st day of December 2005 CE

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus

Censores, Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41122 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: Question about this vote
Salve Marca Hortensia,

Maior wrote:

> M. Hortensia G. Equitio Marino quiritibus spd;
> Marine can you explain please how this came about?

Consul Laenas and I were contacted yesterday and asked what provisions
had been made to insure the continuity of government if the election
results weren't posted by midnight Rome time tonight (in about 10
minutes). Realizing that no provisions had been made, we came up with a
quick plan for an interregnum if it had been necessary, and he called
the Senate.

> Really it is absolutely mad to come up with an 'interrex' when we
> have uncontested consuls and tribunes.

We had uncontested elections, I know, but we had no report of the
results. I still haven't seen any results for the Tribunes. Will we
have tribunes tomorrow?

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41123 From: Maior Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re Where are the new Tribunes!
M. Hortensia Censoris Marino spd;
I just returned from shopping, so the Senate has disbanded without
announcing the new tribunes! How could this happen? The tribune race
is uncontested you can announce it based on Germanicus's count.
Eheu what a mess....
vale
Marca Hortensia Maior & I am no longer tribune under Roman
time.
> We had uncontested elections, I know, but we had no report of the
> results. I still haven't seen any results for the Tribunes. Will
we
> have tribunes tomorrow?
>
> Vale,
>
> -- Marinus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41124 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2005-12-31
Subject: Re: DE TABVLARIO
> Salue, Ti. Galerio Paulino, et saluete, quirites!
>
> Salve A. Tullia Scholastica
>
> Thank you for your efforts. As one who spends considerable time in
> the Tabularium your work has not gone unnoticed . It is an immense
> undertaking and I thank you again for doing it.
>
> ATS: Thank you very much, and congratulations on your election. I am
> glad that this has helped you, and hope that in time it will help others‹and
> hope that the addition of the notes where the titles were changed has
> satisfied any of your misgivings on that issue; it would have been very
> confusing for future citizens to find the rogatores charged with duties they
> no longer have, as it already has been for one of the candidates for this
> position. Correcting the Tabularium is indeed a massive undertaking, made all
> the more difficult by the very limited time in which it had to be
> performed‹and the fact that it had to be done twice, for it was effectively
> done when Caluus left and took the working site with him; had he told me about
> the text editor, I could have made life much easier for him, especially as we
> got farther into the Tabularium and the errors per law increased. I have
> barely lifted my eyes from the Tabularium and the text editor; I wrote my only
> Hanukkah card, and only Christmas card, December 26th. No doubt there are
> people who expected these from me, and wonder whether I am still alive and
> healthy, but I simply didn¹t have time to attend to these cultural
> expectations. The two most distant got holiday cards; the rest will have to
> wait. Virtuous Romans attend to their duties--first.
>
> For your benefit and that of everyone else, I must point out that the Lex
> Equitia de Vigintisexviris has not been uploaded; this required substantial
> correction of the outlining, most of which was embedded in the HTML code, not
> the text proper; just as I was going to correct this, my printer decided to
> quit, and I couldn¹t verify the text code for purposes of correcting it.
> Everything else had been corrected and uploaded a couple of days earlier.
> One law is duplicated, and we have noted this for subsequent removal of the
> duplicate (same law passed in two comitia; a note to that effect, listing the
> votes and dates for both comitia, is quite sufficient), and some require some
> further therapy for linking, etc., but the worst seems to be over‹except for
> correcting the text of any new laws (and most of those proposed at this
> comitia call need it...).
>
> Sometime in the future, we hope to have the approximately ten to twelve
> laws which have been translated into Latin easily accessible by adding the
> word LATINE to the list of languages at the top of the Tabularium page and
> linking this to an index (which I am willing to prepare; I did the current
> one) if some cybernaut will supply the template. I don¹t know how to make
> nice boxes and marble backgrounds...and have only the barest understanding of
> how to create links. There are about six such laws already in the Tabularium,
> fully correct, and I have extracted the text from two of the three bilinguals
> I could find and sent the text of the first to our soon to be former webmaster
> and praetor. The remaining one I could find will have to wait, as will
> sending to any future webmaster; I must be appointed scriba by both the
> praetor the magister aranearius in order to do this work.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
> <fororom@l...> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus omnibus S.P.D.
>> >
>> > I trust that neither Praetor Perusianus nor anyone else will
> object to
>> > my passing along a little information on the Tabularium project.
>> >
>> > I have completed preliminary correction of all the laws in and
> around
>> > the English language section of the Tabularium. Virtually all of
> these have
>> > been uploaded by our excellent and diligent webmaster, C. Minucius
> Scaeuola.
>> > The revised titles are in the index and on the law texts, and,
> with luck,
>> > all errors have been corrected. This is not to say that
> everything is
>> > perfect, for in the press of continuing the corrections, I have
> not had time
>> > to review the laws which have been uploaded; one's eyes do fail
> after
>> > looking after page upon page of unfamiliar HTML-coded text, and
> the index is
>> > a work in progress. However, they are a vast improvement over the
> situation
>> > I found, and hope that this work will be beneficial to the
> quirites.
>> >
>> > There is an outside chance that I will be able to sort out the
> remaining
>> > laws in Latin, and, with some assistance, put them where they can
> be
>> > accessed easily by those who prefer the language of our Roman
> ancestors.
>> >
>> > We may not have magistrates, but we do have laws...
>> >
>> > Valete,
>> >
>> > A. Tullia Scholastica
>> >
>
>
>
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]