Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Feb 1-12, 2006

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41576 From: bee Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Roman's in Arizona
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41577 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: Roman's in Arizona
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41578 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Latrunculi - Roman Board Game
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41579 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: Latrunculi - Roman Board Game
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41580 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41581 From: David Kling Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41582 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: Path of Glory
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41583 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41584 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: EDICTVM CONSVLARE VECTIGALIVM ANNO MMDCCLIX AVC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41585 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Edictum Consulare Gubernatorial Prorogation/Applications for Consid
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41586 From: Brooke Wheeler Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: Roman's in Arizona
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41587 From: TOMMY HUGUELEY Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: Citizenship Test!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41588 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: Citizenship Test!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41589 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Fasti Februarii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41590 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41591 From: David Kling Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41592 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: EDICTVM CONSVLARE VECTIGALIVM ANNO MMDCCLIX AVC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41593 From: Bruno Zani Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: Origin of latin speaking people
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41594 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41595 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41596 From: David Kling Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41597 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare Gubernatorial Prorogation/Applications for Co
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41598 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41599 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41600 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Roman-Era Benefactors' Tomb Unearthed - Yahoo! News
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41601 From: Kevin Landry Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41602 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: a.d. IV Non. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41603 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41604 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41605 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41606 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41607 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41608 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41609 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Re: Path of Glory
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41610 From: FAC Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41611 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Interest For Propraetor Of Canada Occidentalis - Gnaeus Iulius Caes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41612 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Re: Interest For Propraetor Of Canada Occidentalis - Gnaeus Iulius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41613 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: Response to Lee Ann
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41614 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41615 From: Lee-Ann Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: Re: Response to Lee Ann
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41616 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: a.d III Non. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41617 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: Lentulus reversus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41618 From: Iulia Caesaris Cytheris Aege Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: Re: Path of Glory
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41619 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: Re: Lentulus reversus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41620 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: Re: Path of Glory
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41621 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: Re: Lentulus reversus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41622 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: Re: Lentulus reversus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41623 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: Lentulus reversus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41624 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: Response to Lee Ann
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41625 From: Maior Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: Lentulus reversus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41626 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: prid. Non. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41627 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: Path of Glory
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41628 From: Iulia Caesaris Cytheris Aege Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: Path of Glory
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41629 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Praetorian Edict V
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41630 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: Lentulus reversus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41631 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: Path of Glory
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41632 From: decimus_iulius_caesar Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Greetings All
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41633 From: Tasia Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41634 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41635 From: Tasia Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41636 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS VEXELLUM et GEOGRAPHICUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41637 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS VEXELLUM et GEOGRAPHICUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41638 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS VEXELLUM et GEOGRAPHICUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41639 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS VEXELLUM et GEOGRAPHICUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41640 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS VEXELLUM et GEOGRAPHICUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41641 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-02-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS VEXELLUM et GEOGRAPHICUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41642 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2006-02-05
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE VECTIGALIUM APPARITORE 2759 A.V.C.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41643 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-02-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS VEXELLUM et GEOGRAPHICUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41644 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-02-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS VEXELLUM et GEOGRAPHICUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41645 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2006-02-05
Subject: MM Project - Link
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41646 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-02-05
Subject: Re: MM Project - Link
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41647 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-05
Subject: Non. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41648 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-05
Subject: Re: Lentulus reversus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41649 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Non. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41650 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: post. Non. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41651 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41652 From: asinivspollio Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Roman funerary music - funeral of C. Iulius Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41653 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Re: Roman funerary music - funeral of C. Iulius Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41654 From: vespasian72001 Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Larariums!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41655 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Re: Larariums!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41656 From: asinivspollio Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Re: Roman funerary music - funeral of C. Iulius Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41657 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Re: Roman funerary music - funeral of C. Iulius Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41658 From: Tasia Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41659 From: Maior Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Re: Larariums!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41660 From: Tita Artoria Marcella Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41661 From: Vestinia, called Vesta Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: The Full Vestal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41662 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-07
Subject: Re: The Full Vestal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41663 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-07
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41664 From: Ice Hunter Date: 2006-02-07
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41665 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-02-07
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41666 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2006-02-07
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41667 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-07
Subject: a.d. VII Id. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41668 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2006-02-07
Subject: Re: Lentulus reversus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41669 From: Tasia Date: 2006-02-07
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41670 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41671 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: a.d. VI Id. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41672 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41673 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41674 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2325
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41675 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41676 From: James Mathews Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: Name Change Rquest
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41677 From: Gaïus Minius Gallus Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: Roman Laws in French
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41678 From: Tasia Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41679 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41680 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2325
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41681 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41682 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41683 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Fwd: Edictum Consulare Gubernatorial Prorogation/Applications for
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41684 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: a.d. V Id. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41685 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41686 From: Tasia Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41688 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Ordo Equester, the Logo, and the Macellum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41689 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2325
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41690 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Romans in New York City...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41691 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41692 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE (Propraetor agenda)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41693 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Ordo Equester, the Logo, and the Macellum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41694 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE (Propraetor agenda)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41695 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2326
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41696 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41697 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41698 From: darren_pile Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Salve! A new member here to swell the ranks!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41699 From: Herick Augusto Werneck Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Inoltra: Re: [NR_Italia] Roma: trovata tomba XI-X secolo A.C
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41700 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Salve! A new member here to swell the ranks!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41701 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Salve! A new member here to swell the ranks!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41702 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41703 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Salve! A new member here to swell the ranks!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41704 From: Tasia Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41705 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41706 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: Greetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41707 From: darren_pile Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: Salve! A new member here to swell the ranks!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41708 From: David Kling Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41709 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Absent
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41710 From: rysullivan Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Ancient preRoman burials found in Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41711 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41712 From: darren_pile Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41713 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41714 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41715 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41716 From: darren_pile Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41717 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: EDICTVM CENSORIVM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41718 From: darren_pile Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Adding Photos?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41719 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41720 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41721 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41722 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41723 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41724 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41725 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41726 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41727 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41728 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41729 From: darren_pile Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41730 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Conduct on the Main List
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41731 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: An invite to a debate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41732 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: An invite to a debate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41733 From: Robert Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: An invite to a debate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41734 From: marcellus95 Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Regarding Taxes....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41735 From: darren_pile Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: An invite to a debate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41736 From: darren_pile Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: An invite to a debate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41737 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: An invite to a debate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41738 From: FAC Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: New website for PROVINCIA ITALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41739 From: Marcus Audens Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: "Roman Times / Pilum" Quarterlies
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41740 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: An invite to a debate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41741 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: An invite to a debate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41742 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: An invite to a debate--A response from a long time member
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41743 From: Maior Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: An invite to a debate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41744 From: Peter Bird Date: 2006-02-12
Subject: Re: New website for PROVINCIA ITALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41745 From: Shadow DarkFyre Date: 2006-02-12
Subject: Re: An invite to a debate--A response from a long time member
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41746 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2006-02-12
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41747 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-02-12
Subject: Reprise - An invite to a debate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41748 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-02-12
Subject: Re: Reprise - An invite to a debate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41749 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-02-12
Subject: Re: Salve! A new member here to swell the ranks!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41750 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-02-12
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41751 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-02-12
Subject: Welcome to All Provisional Citizens
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41752 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-02-12
Subject: Official Priorities of Nova Roma [was Reprise - An invite to a deba



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41576 From: bee Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Roman's in Arizona
Hi
I am looking for a roman reenacting group in arizona, if possible in
phoenix. I have researched different sites and found nothing. Thanks
b
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41577 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: Roman's in Arizona
Salve "B"

FYI

http://www.legio-ix-hispana.org/<http://www.legio-ix-hispana.org/>


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: bee<mailto:browheel@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 11:45 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Roman's in Arizona


Hi
I am looking for a roman reenacting group in arizona, if possible in
phoenix. I have researched different sites and found nothing. Thanks
b








------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41578 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Latrunculi - Roman Board Game
Salve,

While looking for Mac updates on VersionTracker I ran across this
game. Latrunculi for Mac OSX. Here is the link for it if you have a Mac:

http://mactrunculi.sourceforge.net/Cocoa%20Latrunculi/Welcome%20to%
20Latrunculi%20for%20Mac%20OS%20X.html

Vale,

Quintus Servilius Priscus







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41579 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: Latrunculi - Roman Board Game
Salve,

Just copy and Paste the link to your browser. For some reason the
link did not come out correctly.

QSP


On Feb 1, 2006, at 1:20 AM, Charlie Collins wrote:

Salve,

While looking for Mac updates on VersionTracker I ran across this
game. Latrunculi for Mac OSX. Here is the link for it if you have a Mac:

http://mactrunculi.sourceforge.net/Cocoa%20Latrunculi/Welcome%20to%
20Latrunculi%20for%20Mac%20OS%20X.html

Vale,

Quintus Servilius Priscus







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41580 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Salvete Omnes,

I regretfully tender my resignation as Editor Comentariorum of Nova Roma's Aquila. I take full responsibility for my failure in this task. I am obviously not up to the task as it is shaping up to be. From my experience in the last month, all I can say is that the "Aquila" should be renamed the "Phoenix" since it seems that whenever a new editor takes over he or she must re-invent it from the ashes of its former existence. This I refuse to do. I signed up to take over the helm of an "existing" and "established" entity, not just a "name" to work with. This must probably set a record for a resignation of a magistrate of Nova Roma this early in the year. I do so this early so that perhaps someone more "qualified" than I can take over this position. I do so with a heavy heart since I had so wanted to take it to new heights.

I had intended to take this existing cybermedium into new regions with the new and inexpensive technologies that are now finally available such as short video and audio segments. Recently an award winning short film was made with...a cell phone! Anything from watching a Roman dish being prepared to a short tour of an archeological site or instructions on making simple adjustments and repairs to armor could have easily been done with the help of citizens in Nova Roma who could have provided such clips to the Aquila (as well as the traditional journalistic columns, articles, poems, short stories, horoscope, etc.). Short video interviews of citizens around the world was another aspect I wanted to pursue.

In order to do this I first had to be able to know what I had to work with. I needed to actually access the website domain and find out what was available to work with. Just like an interior decorator must first see the space before he can redesign it, I had to see what was actually there to work with. As I previously stated, I did not foresee that before I could do this job I would have to "re-invent" the Aquila by establishing it from scratch. This is extremely counterproductive! I would have had to spend fruitless time going back and forth to the Senate for funds, approvals, etc. This should not have to happen with an existing publication/website. How can it ever grow or expand into new realms if it has to be reborn every time a new editor takes over. Just because things have always been done this way is no reason for it to continue this way, this is simply stupid!

The former editor of Aquila recommended that I simply do it like he did. Go and write just about every article myself, collect those that others want to contribute and submit them to the man who has the access to the website and who apparently does not have the "authority" to share access to it with the new editor. Then simply tell him the order I would like them to appear in and just let him do the layout and that's that. This is being an editor? I'm sorry but that is not how I work. I have been given "responsibility" by the citizens of Nova Roma by virtue of an election to produce the Aquila. I cannot be "responsible" for a product without any "authority". "Authority" in this meduim is as simple as possessing the password to make changes and downloads in a website. This access has been impossible to obtain.

For some inexplicable reason, no one will provide me with this information. I have spent the last month chasing my tail around trying to get the access to the website to be able to start my job as editor. All I have received in my attempts have been new names of people to contact, which have led me in a circle right back to where I started - nowhere. I think you have all experienced this sort of thing when calling a huge corporation like a phone company (or the new U.S. Post Office System) and getting only the computer menu which led you in a circle over an hour's time right back to where you started from, only totally frustrated by then from listening to muzak or a commercial about there services repeated endlessly.

Who is accountable at Nova Roma for the Aquila if not the Editor, and if this is the case why can the editor not have access to the existing website that holds the Aquila? This is what has finally led me to the conclusion that it isn't worth doing - at least not for me. I had intended to wait until Friday to announce this but I have reached the limit of my patience with this. I have spent an entire month writing messages and accomplishing absolutely nothing!

Valete,
Marcus Cassius Philippus




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41581 From: David Kling Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Marco Cassio Philippo salutem dicit

It is too bad that you feel it necessary to resign, but I understand what it
feels like to be frustrated. However, even though this is an after the fact
sort of thing you should have contacted myself or Pompeia Minucia Strabo.
As Consuls either of us, or both, could have come to a workable solution to
your frustration.

We are here to help.

I see no reason why you shouldn't have had access to the website to do your
job.

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Consul

On 2/1/06, Phil Perez <senseiphil@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> I regretfully tender my resignation as Editor Comentariorum of Nova Roma's
> Aquila. I take full responsibility for my failure in this task. I am
> obviously not up to the task as it is shaping up to be. From my experience
> in the last month, all I can say is that the "Aquila" should be renamed the
> "Phoenix" since it seems that whenever a new editor takes over he or she
> must re-invent it from the ashes of its former existence. This I refuse to
> do. I signed up to take over the helm of an "existing" and "established"
> entity, not just a "name" to work with. This must probably set a record for
> a resignation of a magistrate of Nova Roma this early in the year. I do so
> this early so that perhaps someone more "qualified" than I can take over
> this position. I do so with a heavy heart since I had so wanted to take it
> to new heights.
>
> I had intended to take this existing cybermedium into new regions with the
> new and inexpensive technologies that are now finally available such as
> short video and audio segments. Recently an award winning short film was
> made with...a cell phone! Anything from watching a Roman dish being prepared
> to a short tour of an archeological site or instructions on making simple
> adjustments and repairs to armor could have easily been done with the help
> of citizens in Nova Roma who could have provided such clips to the Aquila
> (as well as the traditional journalistic columns, articles, poems, short
> stories, horoscope, etc.). Short video interviews of citizens around the
> world was another aspect I wanted to pursue.
>
> In order to do this I first had to be able to know what I had to work
> with. I needed to actually access the website domain and find out what was
> available to work with. Just like an interior decorator must first see the
> space before he can redesign it, I had to see what was actually there to
> work with. As I previously stated, I did not foresee that before I could do
> this job I would have to "re-invent" the Aquila by establishing it from
> scratch. This is extremely counterproductive! I would have had to spend
> fruitless time going back and forth to the Senate for funds, approvals, etc.
> This should not have to happen with an existing publication/website. How can
> it ever grow or expand into new realms if it has to be reborn every time a
> new editor takes over. Just because things have always been done this way is
> no reason for it to continue this way, this is simply stupid!
>
> The former editor of Aquila recommended that I simply do it like he did.
> Go and write just about every article myself, collect those that others want
> to contribute and submit them to the man who has the access to the website
> and who apparently does not have the "authority" to share access to it with
> the new editor. Then simply tell him the order I would like them to appear
> in and just let him do the layout and that's that. This is being an editor?
> I'm sorry but that is not how I work. I have been given "responsibility" by
> the citizens of Nova Roma by virtue of an election to produce the Aquila. I
> cannot be "responsible" for a product without any "authority". "Authority"
> in this meduim is as simple as possessing the password to make changes and
> downloads in a website. This access has been impossible to obtain.
>
> For some inexplicable reason, no one will provide me with this
> information. I have spent the last month chasing my tail around trying to
> get the access to the website to be able to start my job as editor. All I
> have received in my attempts have been new names of people to contact, which
> have led me in a circle right back to where I started - nowhere. I think you
> have all experienced this sort of thing when calling a huge corporation like
> a phone company (or the new U.S. Post Office System) and getting only the
> computer menu which led you in a circle over an hour's time right back to
> where you started from, only totally frustrated by then from listening to
> muzak or a commercial about there services repeated endlessly.
>
> Who is accountable at Nova Roma for the Aquila if not the Editor, and if
> this is the case why can the editor not have access to the existing website
> that holds the Aquila? This is what has finally led me to the conclusion
> that it isn't worth doing - at least not for me. I had intended to wait
> until Friday to announce this but I have reached the limit of my patience
> with this. I have spent an entire month writing messages and accomplishing
> absolutely nothing!
>
> Valete,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41582 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: Path of Glory
A. Apollonius Juliae Cytheri omnibusque sal.

> I cannot agree neither with Apollonius Octavio...

Neither can I, because this person doesn't exist. The
words you disagree with were written by Sex. Octavius
Lepidus. I replied to him, quoting his words, and my
reply began with the greeting "A. Apollonius Sex.
Octavio omnibusque sal.", which means "Aulus
Apollonius [that's me] greets Sextus Octavius [that's
him] and everybody".



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41583 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Salve Marcus Cassius Philippus!

I am among those who doesn't like punishing people because they
resign as they might have good reasons to be frustrated.

I am afraid I am very busy in my private life, but I _had_ to see if
I could be of some assistance. Please write to me privately and tell
me who You have talked to and I will see if I can help You. I am a
Sentor and privatus, but I still have good knowledge of the inner
workings of Nova Roma and _might_ be able to help.

Please let us take a last chance for the good of the Res Publica.

>Salvete Omnes,
>
>I regretfully tender my resignation as Editor Comentariorum of Nova
>Roma's Aquila. I take full responsibility for my failure in this
>task. I am obviously not up to the task as it is shaping up to be.
>From my experience in the last month, all I can say is that the
>"Aquila" should be renamed the "Phoenix" since it seems that
>whenever a new editor takes over he or she must re-invent it from
>the ashes of its former existence. This I refuse to do. I signed up
>to take over the helm of an "existing" and "established" entity, not
>just a "name" to work with. This must probably set a record for a
>resignation of a magistrate of Nova Roma this early in the year. I
>do so this early so that perhaps someone more "qualified" than I can
>take over this position. I do so with a heavy heart since I had so
>wanted to take it to new heights.

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Senator, Censorius et Consularis
Accensus GFBM, Scriba Censoris GEM
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41584 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: EDICTVM CONSVLARE VECTIGALIVM ANNO MMDCCLIX AVC
EDICTVM CONSVLARE VECTIGALIVM ANNO MMDCCLIX AVC


I. Secundum Senatus Consultum mense Novembre anno MMDCCLV A.V.C. iussum
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2002-11-09-results.html pretium vectigalium anno MMDCCLIX ex hoc statuo

(Pursuant to the Senatus Consultum passed in November of 2755 auc, http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2002-11-09-results.html
I hereby establish the tax rates for 2759 auc.)

TABVLA PRAETIORVM VECTIGALIVM NOVAE ROMAE ANNO MMDCCLIX AVC
( Nova RomaTax Rate Table for 2759 ab urbe condita)




COUNTRY/PROV. NR PAYABLE USD EQUIV. CURRENCY
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
Albania $1.47 149.60 ALL
____________________________________________________________________
Andorra 8.04 6.60 EURO
____________________________________________________________________
Armenia 1.53 672.40 AMD
____________________________________________________________________
Argentina
(Argentina) 1.08 3.28 ARS
____________________________________________________________________
Austria
(Germania) 6.87 5.67 EURO
____________________________________________________________________

Australia
(Australia) 9.60 12.85 AUD
____________________________________________________________________
Bosnia &Herzigovina 2.04 3.23 BAM
____________________________________________________________________
Brazil
(Brazilia) 2.55 5.80 BRL
_____________________________________________________________________
Bulgaria 2.70 4.33 BGN
_______________________________________________________________________
Belgium
(Gallia) 9.54 7.88 EURO
______________________________________________________________________
Canada
(Canada Orientalis) 9.80 11.30 CAD
______________________________________________________________________
Canada
(Canada Occidentalis) 9.80 11.30 CAD
______________________________________________________________________
Chili 3.39 1800.31 CLP
______________________________________________________________________
China 1.86 15.00 CNY
_______________________________________________________________________
Columbia 2.13 4834.30 COP
_______________________________________________________________________
Costa Rica 3.00 1496.25 CRC
_______________________________________________________________________
Croatia 3.57 21.79 HRK
_______________________________________________________________________
Czech Rep.
(Pannonia) 5.43 127.23 CZK
_______________________________________________________________________
Denmark
(Thule) 10.05 61.95 DMK
_______________________________________________________________________
Ecuador 1.17 29250. 00 ECS
______________________________________________________________________
Finland
(Thule) 9.09 7.50 EURO
______________________________________________________________________
France
(Gallia) 8.97 7.40 EURO
_______________________________________________________________________
Germany
(Germania) 8.91 7.35 EURO
_______________________________________________________________________
Greece 6.84 5.65 EURO
_______________________________________________________________________
Honduras 0.87 16.40 HNL
______________________________________________________________________
Hungary
(Pannonia) 4.77 976.86 HVF
______________________________________________________________________
Ireland
(Hibernia) 10.23 8.45 EURO or Use UK rate below
_______________________________________________________________________
Iceland
(Thule) 10.38 632.54 ISK
______________________________________________________________________
Israel
(Asia Occidentalis) 6.66 30.75 ILS
_______________________________________________________________________
Italy
(Italia) 8.49 7.00 EURO
______________________________________________________________________
Japan
(Asia Orientalis) 9.12 1052.63 JPY
_______________________________________________________________________
Korea (s)
(Asia Orientalis) 6.39 5.28 KPW
______________________________________________________________________
Luxemberg 18.81 15.54 EURO
______________________________________________________________________
Macedonia 2.22 112.80 MKD
______________________________________________________________________
Malaysia
(Asia Orientalis) 3.12 11.70 MYR
______________________________________________________________________
Mexico
(Mexico) 3.00 31.57 MXP
______________________________________________________________________
Netherlands
(Gallia) 9.15 7.56 EURO
_______________________________________________________________________
NewZealand
7.23 10.66 NZD
_______________________________________________________________________
Nicaragua 0.84 14.35 NIO
________________________________________________________________________
Nigeria 0.30 38.93 NGN
______________________________________________________________________
Norway
(Thule) 12.72 84.89 NOK
_______________________________________________________________________
Phillipines
(Asia Orientalis) 1 .53 80.82 PHP
_______________________________________________________________________
Portugal
(Hispania) 5.52 4.56 EURO
________________________________________________________________________
Poland
(Venedia) 3.81 12.00 PLN
________________________________________________________________________
Romania
(Dacia) 2.49 7.40 ROL
_______________________________________________________________________
Russia
(Sarmatia) 3.21 90.70 RUR
_______________________________________________________________________
Singapore
(Asia Orientalis) 8.91 14.50 SGD
_______________________________________________________________________
Slovakia
(Pannonia) 4.71 144.17 SKK
________________________________________________________________________
S. Africa 3.57 21.40 ZAR
_______________________________________________________________________
Spain
(Hispania) 7.53 6.20 EURO
________________________________________________________________________
Sweden
(Thule) 8.88 68.28 SEK
________________________________________________________________________
Switzerland
(Germania) 10.50 13.47 CHF
________________________________________________________________________
Turkey
(Asia Occidentalis) 2.37 3.17 TRL
_______________________________________________________________________
Ukraine
(Sarmatia) 2.04 1032.38 UAH
________________________________________________________________________
UK
(Britannia) 9.27 5.25 GBP
________________________________________________________________________
Uruguay 3.00 72.15 UYU
________________________________________________________________________
Venezuala 1.92 4163.05 VEB
_______________________________________________________________________
Vietnam 0.90 14328.92 VND
_______________________________________________________________________
United States of America Provinciae Novae Romae:

Austroccidentalis............ 12.50 USD
Austrorientalis .................12.50 USD
Boreoccidentalis ..............12.50 USD
California .........................12.50 USD
Laci Magni ......................12.50 USD
Mediatlantica....................12.50 USD
Medioccidentalis.............. 12.50 USD
Nova Britannia................. 12.50 USD

_______________________________________________________________________

II. Pridie Kalendas Maias dies ultima in qua vectigalia sine poena pendantur constituta est. Licet vectigalia pendere post illam diem, sed poena dimidia parte (quinquaginta[L]percento) debebitur. Exempli gratia, necesse est ut civis qui ante diem ultimam thaleros duodecim ($XII) debeat, postquam thaleros duodeviginti ($XVIII) pendant.

(Deadline for remittance of taxes is the last day of April. Taxes may be remitted after that date, with a penalty of an extra 50%. For example, a citizen who owes 12.00 would need to pay 18.00 after the deadline.)

III. Vnicuique qui/quae provinciae gubernator est exemplar huius edicti ad provinciae indices (ubi exstant) transmittendum est. Vnicuique traductori Novae Romae publico hunc edictum in linguam/linguas quarum rationaem reddere debet vertendum. Edicti huius appendix consilium civibus continet, et cum edicto semetipso transmitti/verti debeat.

(Each provincial governor is required to copy this edict to their provincial lists (where applicable). Each of Nova Roma's official Interpreters is required to translate this edict into the language(s) for which they are responsible. The appendix to this edictum contains advice to citizens and should be forwarded/translated with the main document.)

Hoc edictum statim valet

(This edictum is effective immediately.)

Datum sub manu mea Kalendis Februariis, MMDCCLIX A.V.C.
Gaio Fabio Buteoni Modiano Pompeiae Minuciae Strabone Consulibus

(Given under my hand, this First Day of February, 2759 ab urbe condita in the consulship of Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus and Pompeia Minucia Strabo)


APPENDIX Advice to Citizens

Taxes may be paid in the following ways:

i) Citizens remitting their taxes in US dollars may send a check, money order or equivalent form of payment made payable to NOVA ROMA by mail to this address:

Nova Roma
P.O.Box 1897
Wells, ME
U.S.A. 04090

NB:Those outside the US will need to obtain and send an International Money Order made out in U.S. dollars to the above address. Individual cheques in various currencies are unfortunately not acceptable to send by postal method as the checks are quickly devalued by the multiple bank charges to convert these to U.S. currency.

ii) Some Provincial Governors will choose to arrange a central point in their provincia to which their citizens may remit taxes so that the province will only need to make a single payment to the central treasury. Citizens are encouraged to contact their Governor to determine whether or not such an arrangement will be made. Provincial Governors who follow the practice may choose to retain one-half of the taxes collected in their Province for local use according to the local budgets they have prepared. This arrangement has the advantage of avoiding fees to have funds for local expenditures transmitted back to the Province.

iii) All citizens capable of so doing may remit their taxes through the PayPal service. there is a link on the Nova Roma website main page providing for this. www.novaroma.org You will see a small purple square displaying the words 'DONA DARE' and 'Give to Nova Roma via PayPal' . This is displayed beneath the main menu of the main page. For further information on PayPal please visit www.paypal.com


iv) Please contact the Consul or Consular Quaestor at the addresses below if you are a citizen residing in an area for which a tax rate has not been calculated, and one shall be issued to you.

PLEASE NOTE THIS IMPORTANT ITEM: All citizens should be sure to include their FULL Roman name with their tax payment. For those who are remitting for more than one citizen, ie Governors, a complete list of the FULL names of those citizens for whom taxes are being remitted is essential. Some Gentes have many Familiae and if one does not include his cognomen with his remittance, what could result potentially is the wrong citizen being credited for your tax payment. If possible please try to remember your citizen number, which is included in your profile in the Album Civium on the Nova Roma website. This would be an added help in ensuring you are properly credited.

Rates may differ from last year, and it some areas they are clearly less. They were recalculated using the Total Gross Domestic Products Per Capitae of 2005 ( Jan. 2006 update) of all the countries above, as per the prevailing Senatus Consultum above. Any rounding off in final calculations herein has been confined to the nearest 0.05. Future conversions to USD through PayPal or lending institutions are easily resolved by use of conversion factors for various currencies, and so more liberal rounding of tax fees was not pursued.

Additional Consulta influencing the language of this edict:
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2002-06-01-results.html
Item IV
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2003-01-31-results.html
Item V


Any questions regarding taxation may be directed to myself: Trog99@... or Consular Quaestor C.Arminius Reccanellus
C_Arminius_Reccanellus@...

Many thanks to A. Tullia Scholastica NR Interpretor of Latin for making available the Latin components of this edict.
























---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
With a free 1 GB, there's more in store with Yahoo! Mail.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41585 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Edictum Consulare Gubernatorial Prorogation/Applications for Consid
Pompeia Minucia Strabo Consul Quiritibus S.P.D.

Those governors wishing to be considered for prorogation by the Senate for another year are asked to write the Consuls at Consuls@... so we can ensure that you are on the list for such consideration.

Please be assured that the Feb. 1 deadline was not realistic for this year for a few reasons, and Governors may write in with their intentions until Feb. 15 2006 ce

Further, those who wish to apply for a position as Governor may write to the above address stating their intentions:

Prevailing legislation states that a Propraetor _must_ have assidui status (taypayer status).
Also... see http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2000-06-02-1.html Senatus Consultum on desired qualifications for a Governor.
Please note that the Senate's ruling is not achieved 'strictly' by these criteria in the above Senatus Consultum, in their selection processes regarding governors.

Issued officially on this day kalends February MMDCCLIX A.V.C. in the Consulship of G. Fabius Buteo Modianus and Pompeia Minucia Strabo

valete........


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41586 From: Brooke Wheeler Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: Roman's in Arizona
I have checked it out and the email address for the chapter is invalid!


Tim Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
Salve "B"

FYI

http://www.legio-ix-hispana.org/<http://www.legio-ix-hispana.org/>


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: bee<mailto:browheel@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 11:45 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Roman's in Arizona


Hi
I am looking for a roman reenacting group in arizona, if possible in
phoenix. I have researched different sites and found nothing. Thanks
b








------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





---------------------------------

What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! Autos

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41587 From: TOMMY HUGUELEY Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: Citizenship Test!
My name is Tiberius Octavius Pulvillus I have been trying to become a citizen of Rome for a while now about three weeks .I havent recieved anything in the mail yet concerning citizenship.I think I need to take the citizenship test,but do not know how to go about it.I need you to explain the procees to me.

flavius leviticus <centorious@...> wrote: Save Amichi,CencoresPlease forgive my indiscretions.Thank you for your kind advice.May the Gods protect you.Vale,Appius Galerius Aurelianus,Semper Fidelis.

centorious <centorious@...> wrote: Salve Censores,I would like to attempt the Citizenship Test.Could you
please help me with this?Vale,Appius Galerious Aurelianus,Legio
VI "Ferrata"II Cohort,II Century,Semper Fidelis.








SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------






---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
With a free 1 GB, there's more in store with Yahoo! Mail.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------






---------------------------------
Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more on new and used cars.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41588 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: Citizenship Test!
Salve Pulville, et salvete omnes,

TOMMY HUGUELEY <tommyhugueley@...> writes:

> My name is Tiberius Octavius Pulvillus I have been trying to become a
> citizen of Rome for a while now about three weeks.

Your request was received on 14 January and has been reviewed and approved.
It was assigned to censorial scribe Metellus, who's had some difficulty
recently that has gotten him behind. I'll make sure your application is
processed today. Your provisional citizenship will be effective from the
date of your application.

> I think I need to take the
> citizenship test,but do not know how to go about it.I need you to explain
> the procees to me.

The test is normally taken near the end of the 90 day provisional citizenship.
No need for you to be concerned about it yet.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41589 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Fasti Februarii
Q. Caecilius Metellus Quiritibus salutem.

The calendar for the month of February appears thus:

Kal. Feb. H N
a.d. IV Non. Feb. A N Ater
a.d. III Non. Feb. B N
pr. Non. Feb. C F
Non. Feb. D N
a.d. VIII Id. Feb. E N Ater
a.d. VII Id. Feb. F N
a.d. VI Id. Feb. G N
a.d. V Id. Feb. H N
a.d. IV Id. Feb. A N
a.d. III Id. Feb. B N
pr. Id. Feb. C F
Id. Feb. D NP Religiosus
a.d. XVI Kal. Mar. E N Ater
a.d. XV Kal. Mar. F NP Religiosus
a.d. XIV Kal. Mar. G EN Religiosus
a.d. XIII Kal. Mar. H NP Religiosus
a.d. XII Kal. Mar. A C Religiosus
a.d. XI Kal. Mar. B C Religiosus
a.d. X Kal. Mar. C F Religiosus
a.d. IX Kal. Mar. D FP Religiosus
a.d. VIII Kal. Mar. E C
a.d. VII Kal. Mar. F NP
a.d. VI Kal. Mar. G N
a.d. V Kal. Mar. H C
a.d. IV Kal. Mar. A EN
a.d. III Kal. Mar. B NP
pr. Kal. Mar. C F

As always, I'll be happy to answer your questions, comments, concerns,
and such.

Valete Bene,

Q. Caecilius Metellus
Pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41590 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Jacta alea est.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Kling
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 7:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA


Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Marco Cassio Philippo salutem dicit

It is too bad that you feel it necessary to resign, but I understand what it
feels like to be frustrated. However, even though this is an after the fact
sort of thing you should have contacted myself or Pompeia Minucia Strabo.
As Consuls either of us, or both, could have come to a workable solution to
your frustration.

We are here to help.

I see no reason why you shouldn't have had access to the website to do your
job.

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Consul

On 2/1/06, Phil Perez <senseiphil@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> I regretfully tender my resignation as Editor Comentariorum of Nova Roma's
> Aquila. I take full responsibility for my failure in this task. I am
> obviously not up to the task as it is shaping up to be. From my experience
> in the last month, all I can say is that the "Aquila" should be renamed the
> "Phoenix" since it seems that whenever a new editor takes over he or she
> must re-invent it from the ashes of its former existence. This I refuse to
> do. I signed up to take over the helm of an "existing" and "established"
> entity, not just a "name" to work with. This must probably set a record for
> a resignation of a magistrate of Nova Roma this early in the year. I do so
> this early so that perhaps someone more "qualified" than I can take over
> this position. I do so with a heavy heart since I had so wanted to take it
> to new heights.
>
> I had intended to take this existing cybermedium into new regions with the
> new and inexpensive technologies that are now finally available such as
> short video and audio segments. Recently an award winning short film was
> made with...a cell phone! Anything from watching a Roman dish being prepared
> to a short tour of an archeological site or instructions on making simple
> adjustments and repairs to armor could have easily been done with the help
> of citizens in Nova Roma who could have provided such clips to the Aquila
> (as well as the traditional journalistic columns, articles, poems, short
> stories, horoscope, etc.). Short video interviews of citizens around the
> world was another aspect I wanted to pursue.
>
> In order to do this I first had to be able to know what I had to work
> with. I needed to actually access the website domain and find out what was
> available to work with. Just like an interior decorator must first see the
> space before he can redesign it, I had to see what was actually there to
> work with. As I previously stated, I did not foresee that before I could do
> this job I would have to "re-invent" the Aquila by establishing it from
> scratch. This is extremely counterproductive! I would have had to spend
> fruitless time going back and forth to the Senate for funds, approvals, etc.
> This should not have to happen with an existing publication/website. How can
> it ever grow or expand into new realms if it has to be reborn every time a
> new editor takes over. Just because things have always been done this way is
> no reason for it to continue this way, this is simply stupid!
>
> The former editor of Aquila recommended that I simply do it like he did.
> Go and write just about every article myself, collect those that others want
> to contribute and submit them to the man who has the access to the website
> and who apparently does not have the "authority" to share access to it with
> the new editor. Then simply tell him the order I would like them to appear
> in and just let him do the layout and that's that. This is being an editor?
> I'm sorry but that is not how I work. I have been given "responsibility" by
> the citizens of Nova Roma by virtue of an election to produce the Aquila. I
> cannot be "responsible" for a product without any "authority". "Authority"
> in this meduim is as simple as possessing the password to make changes and
> downloads in a website. This access has been impossible to obtain.
>
> For some inexplicable reason, no one will provide me with this
> information. I have spent the last month chasing my tail around trying to
> get the access to the website to be able to start my job as editor. All I
> have received in my attempts have been new names of people to contact, which
> have led me in a circle right back to where I started - nowhere. I think you
> have all experienced this sort of thing when calling a huge corporation like
> a phone company (or the new U.S. Post Office System) and getting only the
> computer menu which led you in a circle over an hour's time right back to
> where you started from, only totally frustrated by then from listening to
> muzak or a commercial about there services repeated endlessly.
>
> Who is accountable at Nova Roma for the Aquila if not the Editor, and if
> this is the case why can the editor not have access to the existing website
> that holds the Aquila? This is what has finally led me to the conclusion
> that it isn't worth doing - at least not for me. I had intended to wait
> until Friday to announce this but I have reached the limit of my patience
> with this. I have spent an entire month writing messages and accomplishing
> absolutely nothing!
>
> Valete,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
Fall of the roman empire The roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41591 From: David Kling Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Oh so very true. Whats done is done.

In the future however.... if you or anyone encounters trouble, you should
connect with the right people to find a solution.

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 2/1/06, Phil Perez <senseiphil@...> wrote:
>
> Jacta alea est.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41592 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: EDICTVM CONSVLARE VECTIGALIVM ANNO MMDCCLIX AVC
Salve Romans

Our Consul Pompeia Minucia Strabo stated in part

"PLEASE NOTE THIS IMPORTANT ITEM: All citizens should be sure to
include their FULL Roman name with their tax payment." Â….

While the Consul and her Quaestor can and will collect taxes as they
see fit I would highly recommend that in addition to your Roman name
and citizen number you should include your macro national name and
province.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41593 From: Bruno Zani Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: Origin of latin speaking people
Salvete Muzafer33 omnesque,

I know that the "(P)Latini" (or "Lowlanders") called themselves so
to distinguish themselves from the "Albani" which, (from a root
of "alp" or "alb") were the "Highlanders". I do not know what their
name was before they moved into Italy. Do you happen to know?

Thanks
Bruno



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "muzafer33" <muzafer33@...> wrote:
>
> For different reasons, i am strongly interested in the origins of
the
> latins, especially in the origin of the so called "prisci latins".
As
> far as i know, they have come from the Danube region,
aproximattely at
> 1000 B.C . Howewer, i found no source mentioning more clearly from
> what area of the Danube they came... this is quite an important
> matter for discussing in Dacia now.
>
> Can anybody help me find some clear data about this ?
>
>
> Nicetas Dacicus, Colonia Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41594 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano M. Philippo Cassio
quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

After reading his resignation, consul, I am confused as to why you
might suggest that he do something that he has already done. Who owns
the website and why was the new editor not given control over it?
Again, I ask: WHO owns the website and refused to give the editor access?

Valete,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Oh so very true. Whats done is done.
>
> In the future however.... if you or anyone encounters trouble, you
should
> connect with the right people to find a solution.
>
> Vale:
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On 2/1/06, Phil Perez <senseiphil@...> wrote:
> >
> > Jacta alea est.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41595 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Kal. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est Kalendis Februariis; haec dies nefastus publicus est.


"His [Numa Pompilius'] regulations, moreover, that tended to inspire
frugality and moderation in the life of the individual citizen and to
create a passion for justice, which preserves the harmony of the
State, were exceedingly numerous, some of them being comprehended in
written laws, and others not written down by embodied in custom and
long usage. To treat of all these would be a difficult task; but
mention of the two of them which have been most frequently cited will
suffice to give evidence of the rest. First, to the end that people
should be content with what they had and should not covet what
belonged to others, there was the law that appointed boundaries to
every man's possessions. For, having ordered every one to draw a line
around his own land and to place stones on the bounds, he consecrated
these stones to Jupiter Terminalis and ordained that all should
assemble at the place every year on a fixed day and offer sacrifices
to them; and he made the festival in honour of these gods of
boundaries among the most dignified of all. This festival the Romans
call Terminalia, from the boundaries, and the boundaries themselves,
by the change of one letter as compared with our language, they call
termines. He also enacted that, if any person demolished or displaced
these boundary stones he should be looked upon as devoted to the god,
to the end that anyone who wished might kill him a sacrilegious person
with impunity and without incurring any stain of guilt. He
established this law with reference not only to private possessions
but also to those belonging to the public; for he marked these also
with boundary stones, to the end that the gods of boundaries might
distinguish the lands of the Romans from those of their neighbours,
and the public lands from such as belonged to private persons.
Memorials of this custom are observed by the Romans down to our times,
purely as a religious form. For they look upon these boundary stones
as gods and sacrifice to them yearly, offering up no kind of animal
(for it is not lawful to stain these stones with blood), but cakes
made of cereals and other first-fruits of the earth. But they ought
still to observe the motive, as well, which led Numa to regard these
boundary stones as gods and content themselves with their own
possessions without appropriating those of others either by violence
or by fraud; whereas now there are some who, in disregard of what is
best and of the example of their ancestors, instead of distinguishing
that which is theirs from that which belongs to others, set as bounds
to their possessions, not the law, but their greed to possess
everything, — which is disgraceful behaviour. But we leave the
considerations of these matters to others." - Dionysius of
Halicarnassus, "Roman Antiquities" 2.74


"At the start of the month they say that Juno the Saviour (Sospita),
Neighbouring the Phrygian Mother, was honoured with new shrines.
If you ask where those temples, dedicated to the goddess
On the Kalends, are now, they are fallen with the lapse of time.
All the rest would have similarly fallen in ruins,
But for the far-sighted concern of our sacred Leader,
Under whose rule the shrines are untouched by age:
Not satisfied with mere men, he also serves the gods.
Pious one, you who build and repair the temples,
May there be mutual care between you and the gods!
May the gods grant you the length of years you grant them,
And may they stand on guard before your house!
On this day too the grove of Alernus is crowded,
Near where Tiber, from afar, meets the ocean waves.
At Numa's sanctuary, and the Thunderer's on the Capitol,
And on the summit of Jove's citadel, a sheep is sacrificed.
Often the sky, covered with cloud, rains heavily,
Or the earth is hidden under a blanket of snow." - Ovid, Fasti II

February is dedicated to the god Mars and to His mother, Iuno (as Iuno
Sospita). The name Februarius, the modern February, is probably
derived from the Latin word februum, religious purification, or from
februa, instruments of purification, or perhaps from the name of the
obscure Etruscan deity Februus. He originally belonged to the Sabine
people of the Apennines. The Etruscans were also very keen on him, but
he was borrowed by the conquering Romans who were looking for a decent
purifying God to help with the spring-cleaning. Most of the festival
days in February are days of solemn religious observance, dedicated to
honoring and propitiating the spirits of the ancestors. February is a
month in which particular reverence was shown to the spirits of
deceased ancestors. In a familiar cultural dichotomy in which both
death and life were celebrated, this was a month devoted to fertility,
both of men and women, and of the land. Many of the rites had vestiges
of agricultural overtones. It may be more than coincidence that the
dead, who were either buried or considered to be in the "underworld",
and the fruits of agriculture, both relate to the earth.


Valete bene,

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Ovid Februus
(http://www.godchecker.com/pantheon/roman-mythology.php?deity=FEBRUUS)
and
(http://www.godchecker.com/pantheon/roman-mythology.php?deity=FEBRUUS)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41596 From: David Kling Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Suggesting that he should have contacted the consuls, and suggesting any
magistrate for that matter who is frustrated in the performance of their
duties to contact the consuls is nothing to be confused over. If our former
editor was having problems that he couldn't get resolved he should have
asked for help, and I am sure Pompeia Strabo and I could have figured out a
solution to his frustration quickly, and without much problem.

We were not informed of a problem, but hear about it the same time you did.

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 2/1/06, gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano M. Philippo Cassio
> quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> After reading his resignation, consul, I am confused as to why you
> might suggest that he do something that he has already done. Who owns
> the website and why was the new editor not given control over it?
> Again, I ask: WHO owns the website and refused to give the editor access?
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41597 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare Gubernatorial Prorogation/Applications for Co
---Salvete Omnes:

I am reposting a link I refer to below in this edictum, which was
incorrectly displayed:

http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2000-06-02-i.html

I apologize for the inconvenience.

Vale
Pompeia
************************************************************



In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Pompeia Minucia Strabo
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> Pompeia Minucia Strabo Consul Quiritibus S.P.D.
>
> Those governors wishing to be considered for prorogation by the
Senate for another year are asked to write the Consuls at
Consuls@... so we can ensure that you are on the list for such
consideration.
>
> Please be assured that the Feb. 1 deadline was not realistic for
this year for a few reasons, and Governors may write in with their
intentions until Feb. 15 2006 ce
>
> Further, those who wish to apply for a position as Governor may
write to the above address stating their intentions:
>
> Prevailing legislation states that a Propraetor _must_ have
assidui status (taypayer status).
> Also... see http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2000-06-02-
1.html Senatus Consultum on desired qualifications for a Governor.
> Please note that the Senate's ruling is not achieved 'strictly'
by these criteria in the above Senatus Consultum, in their selection
processes regarding governors.
>
> Issued officially on this day kalends February MMDCCLIX A.V.C.
in the Consulship of G. Fabius Buteo Modianus and Pompeia Minucia
Strabo
>
> valete........
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41598 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Yes, I understand what you're saying, consul; however, I ask once
again: who exactly did this? Will there be any correction of this
situation, now that you actually know about it?

Vale et valete,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Suggesting that he should have contacted the consuls, and suggesting any
> magistrate for that matter who is frustrated in the performance of their
> duties to contact the consuls is nothing to be confused over. If
our former
> editor was having problems that he couldn't get resolved he should have
> asked for help, and I am sure Pompeia Strabo and I could have
figured out a
> solution to his frustration quickly, and without much problem.
>
> We were not informed of a problem, but hear about it the same time
you did.
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On 2/1/06, gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
> >
> > C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano M. Philippo Cassio
> > quiritibusque S.P.D.
> >
> > Salvete omnes.
> >
> > After reading his resignation, consul, I am confused as to why you
> > might suggest that he do something that he has already done. Who owns
> > the website and why was the new editor not given control over it?
> > Again, I ask: WHO owns the website and refused to give the editor
access?
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Cato
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41599 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
---Salvete Omnes:

I concur with the Senior Consul herein.

As much as I can empathize with some of the identified frustrations
of the resigned Editor, I cannot ameliorate a situation I know
nothing about.

And to any and all who are experiencing similar frustrations in
their work in NR as a magistrate, whether appointed or elected, I
also encourage you please, to first seek help in finding a
resolution to any factors that are making your work more difficult
than perhaps it need be. Quite often problems can be ironed out
much more easily than one might perceive in the heat of frustration
or disillusionment. As my Honoured Colleague has earlier conveyed,
the Consuls are happy to assist in this regard.

Bene valete
Pompeia Minucia Strabo




In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...>
wrote:
>
> Suggesting that he should have contacted the consuls, and
suggesting any
> magistrate for that matter who is frustrated in the performance of
their
> duties to contact the consuls is nothing to be confused over. If
our former
> editor was having problems that he couldn't get resolved he should
have
> asked for help, and I am sure Pompeia Strabo and I could have
figured out a
> solution to his frustration quickly, and without much problem.
>
> We were not informed of a problem, but hear about it the same time
you did.
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On 2/1/06, gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
> >
> > C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano M. Philippo Cassio
> > quiritibusque S.P.D.
> >
> > Salvete omnes.
> >
> > After reading his resignation, consul, I am confused as to why
you
> > might suggest that he do something that he has already done.
Who owns
> > the website and why was the new editor not given control over it?
> > Again, I ask: WHO owns the website and refused to give the
editor access?
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Cato
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41600 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Roman-Era Benefactors' Tomb Unearthed - Yahoo! News
Avete omnes,

A link I thought of interest.

>
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060202/ap_on_sc/greece_archaeology
>

Here's the 1st paragraph of the story:

ATHENS, Greece - A well-preserved underground tomb belonging to a
prominent Roman-era family has been unearthed on the island of Crete,
archaeologists said Wednesday.

=========================================
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias, Diribitor et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poet

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/


http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/

--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41601 From: Kevin Landry Date: 2006-02-01
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
It seems a simple understanding. the Webmaster saw the editor position as a
content editor where as the resigning editor sought more control. It is
good to see volunteers step forward but it is all to common for
misunderstandings and hurt feelings.


Marcus Octavius Taurus

On 02/02/06, gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salve et salvete.
>
> Yes, I understand what you're saying, consul; however, I ask once
> again: who exactly did this? Will there be any correction of this
> situation, now that you actually know about it?
>
> Vale et valete,
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
> >
> > Suggesting that he should have contacted the consuls, and suggesting any
> > magistrate for that matter who is frustrated in the performance of their
> > duties to contact the consuls is nothing to be confused over. If
> our former
> > editor was having problems that he couldn't get resolved he should have
> > asked for help, and I am sure Pompeia Strabo and I could have
> figured out a
> > solution to his frustration quickly, and without much problem.
> >
> > We were not informed of a problem, but hear about it the same time
> you did.
> >
> > Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
> > On 2/1/06, gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano M. Philippo Cassio
> > > quiritibusque S.P.D.
> > >
> > > Salvete omnes.
> > >
> > > After reading his resignation, consul, I am confused as to why you
> > > might suggest that he do something that he has already done. Who owns
> > > the website and why was the new editor not given control over it?
> > > Again, I ask: WHO owns the website and refused to give the editor
> access?
> > >
> > > Valete,
> > >
> > > Cato
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Roman+empire&w2=Ancient+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+roman+empire&c=5&s=113&.sig=V_ohQEPlKSUophzoyeKo7A> Ancient
> history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Roman+empire&w2=Ancient+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+roman+empire&c=5&s=113&.sig=qUOMYbt4Zn7Yl_BI9eyvCA> Citizenship
> test<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Citizenship+test&w1=Roman+empire&w2=Ancient+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+roman+empire&c=5&s=113&.sig=i89al2nzLhouXVUtOu-wDQ> Fall
> of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Roman+empire&w2=Ancient+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+roman+empire&c=5&s=113&.sig=cvvUbwFz4SII0tNReHlQkw> The
> roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+roman+empire&w1=Roman+empire&w2=Ancient+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+roman+empire&c=5&s=113&.sig=o0D-t5cCQCdxurytCXSC7Q>
> ------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> - Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>"
> on the web.
>
> - To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> - Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>



--
Kevin Landry, MA TESOL

Full time Lecturer, Department of General Studies (A403-1)
KOTESOL Nominations and Elections Committee Chair
Teacher Education & Development SIG Facilitator

Hongik University, Jochiwon Campus,
Choongchungnam-do, Yeongi-gun, Jochiwon-eup, Shinan-ri
339-701. (W) 042-860-2692, (C) 016-373-1492,
Email: lklandry@...


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41602 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: a.d. IV Non. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem IV Nonas Februarius; haec dies fastus aterque est.


"After the death of Numa Pompilius the senate, being once more in full
control of the commonwealth, resolved to abide by the same form of
government, and as the people did not adopt any contrary opinion, they
appointed some of the older senators to govern as interreges for a
definite number of days. These men, pursuant to the unanimous desire
of the people, chose as king Tullus Hostilius, whose descent was as
follows. From Medullia, a city which had been built by the Albans and
made a Roman colony by Romulus after he had taken it by capitulation,
a man of distinguished birth and great fortune, named Hostilius, had
removed to Rome and married a woman of the Sabine race, the daughter
of Hersilius, the same woman who had advised her country-women to go
as envoys to their fathers on behalf of their husbands at the time
when the Sabines were making war against the Romans, and was regarded
as the person chiefly responsible for the alliance then concluded by
the leaders of the two nations. This man, after taking part with
Romulus in many wars and performing mighty deeds in the battles with
the Sabines, died, leaving an only son, a young child at the time, and
was buried by the kings in the principal part of the Forum and
honoured with a monument and an inscription testifying to his valour.
His only son, having come to manhood and married a woman of
distinction, had by her Tullius Hostilius, a man of action, the same
who was now chosen king by a vote passed by the citizens concerning
him according to the laws; and the decision of the people was
confirmed by favourable omens from Heaven. The year in which he
assumed the sovereignty was the second of the twenty-seventh Olympiad,
the one in which Eurybates, an Athenian, won the prize in the
foot-race, Leostratus being archon at Athens. Tullus, immediately
upon his accession, gained the hearts of all the labouring class and
of the needy among the populace by performing an act of the most
splendid kind. It was this: The kings before him had possessed much
fertile land, especially reserved for them, from the revenues of which
they not only offered sacrifices to the gods, but also had abundant
provision for their private needs. This land Romulus had acquired in
war by dispossessing the former owners, and when he died childless,
Numa Pompilius, his successor, had enjoyed its use; it was no longer
the property of the state, but the inherited possession of the
successive kings. Tullus now permitted this land to be divided
equally among such of the Romans as had no allotment, declaring that
his own patrimony was sufficient both for the sacrifices and for his
personal expenditures. By this act of humanity he relieved the poor
among the citizens by freeing them from the necessity of labouring as
serfs on the estates of others. And, to the end that none might lack a
habitation either, he included within the city wall the hill called
the Caelian, where those Romans who were unprovided with dwellings
were allotted a sufficient amount of ground and built houses; and he
himself had his residence in this quarter. These, then, are the
memorable actions reported of this king so far as regards his civil
administration." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus, "Roman Antiquities" 3.1


Today is celebrated as Groundhog Day in the U.S. Punxsutawney Phil, a
groundhog, is the official arbiter of when winter will end; he
annually makes an appearance to forecast whether there are six more
weeks of winter or if spring is just around the corner. For more
information, see this website:

http://www.groundhog.org


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41603 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
> After reading his resignation, consul, I am confused as to why you
> might suggest that he do something that he has already done. Who owns
> the website and why was the new editor not given control over it?
> Again, I ask: WHO owns the website and refused to give the editor access?

The owner of the server hosting novaroma.org received no requests for
access. I've searched my mailbox for 'senseiphil' and found absolutely
nothing.

Vale, Octavius.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41604 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
C. Equitius Cato T. Octavio Pio M. Cassio Philippo S.P.D.

Salve viri.

None? This is a little puzzling. Philippus Cassius, to whom did you
write in your attempts to access the "Aquila"?

Vale et valete,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> wrote:
>
>
> > After reading his resignation, consul, I am confused as to why you
> > might suggest that he do something that he has already done. Who owns
> > the website and why was the new editor not given control over it?
> > Again, I ask: WHO owns the website and refused to give the editor
access?
>
> The owner of the server hosting novaroma.org received no requests for
> access. I've searched my mailbox for 'senseiphil' and found absolutely
> nothing.
>
> Vale, Octavius.
>
> --
> hucke@...
> http://www.graveyards.com
>
> "The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
> voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41605 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Salve Cato,

None? This is a little puzzling. Philippus Cassius, to whom did you
write in your attempts to access the "Aquila"?

What's done is done. I made some mistakes myself, but I've had enough. This is my last posting on this topic - Sorry, I'm sick of it, its been going on for a month. Here is the list and dates:

1. Jan 8 My initial request was put to Tiberius Galerius Paulinus after he congratulated me and offered some good tips. His response: see Senator Audens about it since he was the outgoing editor. Here is where the bureaucratic run-around started.
2. Jan. 10 e-mailed Senator Audens through Nova Britannia's Yahoo group (I had not received any responses from him in quite a while via his regular e-mail address and I presumed it was not working;
3. Jan. 11 e-mailed Senator Audens again off-list to his regular e-mail address in response to his response about it (He seemed to be upset with me for not doing it off-list to start with);
4. Jan. 17 another e-mail back and forth to Senator Audens about it;
5. Jan 18 yet another e-mail to Senator Audens about my concerns;
6. Jan. 20 again;
7. Jan. 25 e-mailed Mr. Valenzano about it after finally finding out from Senator Audens that he (Mr. Valenzano) did the downloads and he would be able to help me out;
8. Jan. 25 sent an e-mail to Germanicus about it after being told by Mr. Valenzano that he (Mr. Valenzano) had no authority to share that information with me and only the website owner - Germanicus could provide me with it.
9. Jan. 28 yet another e-mail to Germanicus after he failed to address this issue in his response to me. (I have yet to receive one from him about it to date!)
10. Jan. 30 One last e-mail to Senator Audens making him aware (at his previous request) of my pending resignation if I chose that option.

Valete,
Marcus Cassius Philippus

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41606 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Phil Perez wrote:

> 8. Jan. 25 sent an e-mail to Germanicus about it after being told by
> Mr. Valenzano that he (Mr. Valenzano) had no authority to share that
> information with me and only the website owner - Germanicus could
> provide me with it.
> 9. Jan. 28 yet another e-mail to Germanicus after he failed to address
> this issue in his response to me. (I have yet to receive one from
> him about it to date!)

As there are two prominent citizens with that cognomen, I suspect this may
be the source of the problem, and that you asked Flavius Vedius Germanicus
for access that he couldn't give. I've always preferred that people call
me "Octavius" to avoid this confusion.

Vale, M. Octavius Germanicus.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41607 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Salve Octavius,

Well that solves that little mystery. I had no way to know this from the communication I received and since the "other" Germanicus is one of the founders of NR you can understand why I "assumed" he was the Germanicus in question. Again, a dollar short and a day too late.

M.C. Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: Matt Hucke
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA


On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Phil Perez wrote:

> 8. Jan. 25 sent an e-mail to Germanicus about it after being told by
> Mr. Valenzano that he (Mr. Valenzano) had no authority to share that
> information with me and only the website owner - Germanicus could
> provide me with it.
> 9. Jan. 28 yet another e-mail to Germanicus after he failed to address
> this issue in his response to me. (I have yet to receive one from
> him about it to date!)

As there are two prominent citizens with that cognomen, I suspect this may
be the source of the problem, and that you asked Flavius Vedius Germanicus
for access that he couldn't give. I've always preferred that people call
me "Octavius" to avoid this confusion.

Vale, M. Octavius Germanicus.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887


SPONSORED LINKS Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
Fall of the roman empire The roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41608 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
> A. Tullia Scholastica M. Octauio Germanico quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
> omnibus S.P.D.
>
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Phil Perez wrote:
>
>> > 8. Jan. 25 sent an e-mail to Germanicus about it after being told by
>> > Mr. Valenzano that he (Mr. Valenzano) had no authority to share that
>> > information with me and only the website owner - Germanicus could
>> > provide me with it.
>> > 9. Jan. 28 yet another e-mail to Germanicus after he failed to address
>> > this issue in his response to me. (I have yet to receive one from
>> > him about it to date!)
>
> As there are two prominent citizens with that cognomen, I suspect this may
> be the source of the problem, and that you asked Flavius Vedius Germanicus
> for access that he couldn't give.
>
> ATS: Indeed, and there are many people in NRwith the same cognomen. As I
> note occasionally in the censorial cohors, we have more Caesars (and would-be
> Caesars) than Rome ever did. However, since cognomina ending in ­icus denote
> conquerors, we aren¹t allowing them any more, and are restricting cognomina in
> ­ianus to adoptees.
>
> However, here in NR, Flauius Vedius Germanicus is all but universally
> known by his nomen, Vedius, not his cognomen (an honor most often accorded to
> you, M. Octaui), so I¹m a bit surprised that anyone would confuse you (and you
> two aren¹t the only Germanici...not to mention that we get a good many
> requests for that name, too).
>
> I've always preferred that people call
> me "Octavius" to avoid this confusion.
>
> Vale, M. Octavius Germanicus.
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
Rogatrix




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41609 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Re: Path of Glory
> Salue, Stephane Vlleri Venator Piperbarbe, et saluete, omnes!
>
>
> Avete Omnes,
>
> I wrote this 5 days after turning 18.
>
> ATS: And it¹s another wonderful poem, if on a rather painful subject. You
> are truly gifted. Would you care to send this one to Musarum, too?
>
> Fragment from a Battlefield
> 17 March 1975
>
> The waiting is
> The hardest part
> The not knowing
> The hanging time
>
> I look across
> The open field
> At long dark lines
> Of massing foes
>
> The air is thick
> With stink of fear
> But courage is
> To duty do
>
> The bugles blare
> Call to advance
> The foe gives voice
> An awful sound
>
> Shield comrades march
> To charge and fight
> No brave man I
> Nor a coward
>
> It comes to this
> No real glory
> To live or die
> With sword brothers
>
> =========================================
> In amicitia quod fides -
> Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias, Diribitor et Lictor
>
> Religio Septentrionalis - Poet
>
> Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
>
> http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
>
> --
> May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41610 From: FAC Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
Salvete Omnes,

I would clarify my position because my name appeared in the
following schedule. I'm the man called "Mr. Valenzano".
If you would further information about my role in this sad history,
please contact me.

About this sad history, I'm very sad of this misunderstanding
forcing a skilled citizen to resign. This is another terrible hole
of this organization.
What I ask is why the "wrong Germanicus" talked with Illustrus
Cassius Philippus about a matter where he isn't entitled to do it.
Maybe the "wrong Germanicus" should ask the apologies of Philippus
and we should ignore the resignation of the Editor and permit him to
continue his job as well as correct.

Valete
Franciscus Apulus Caesar
aka "Mr. Valenzano"





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Phil Perez" <senseiphil@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Cato,
>
> None? This is a little puzzling. Philippus Cassius, to whom did
you
> write in your attempts to access the "Aquila"?
>
> What's done is done. I made some mistakes myself, but I've had
enough. This is my last posting on this topic - Sorry, I'm sick of
it, its been going on for a month. Here is the list and dates:
>
> 1. Jan 8 My initial request was put to Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
after he congratulated me and offered some good tips. His response:
see Senator Audens about it since he was the outgoing editor. Here
is where the bureaucratic run-around started.
> 2. Jan. 10 e-mailed Senator Audens through Nova Britannia's Yahoo
group (I had not received any responses from him in quite a while
via his regular e-mail address and I presumed it was not working;
> 3. Jan. 11 e-mailed Senator Audens again off-list to his regular
e-mail address in response to his response about it (He seemed to be
upset with me for not doing it off-list to start with);
> 4. Jan. 17 another e-mail back and forth to Senator Audens about
it;
> 5. Jan 18 yet another e-mail to Senator Audens about my concerns;
> 6. Jan. 20 again;
> 7. Jan. 25 e-mailed Mr. Valenzano about it after finally finding
out from Senator Audens that he (Mr. Valenzano) did the downloads
and he would be able to help me out;
> 8. Jan. 25 sent an e-mail to Germanicus about it after being told
by Mr. Valenzano that he (Mr. Valenzano) had no authority to share
that information with me and only the website owner - Germanicus
could provide me with it.
> 9. Jan. 28 yet another e-mail to Germanicus after he failed to
address this issue in his response to me. (I have yet to receive one
from him about it to date!)
> 10. Jan. 30 One last e-mail to Senator Audens making him aware (at
his previous request) of my pending resignation if I chose that
option.
>
> Valete,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41611 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Interest For Propraetor Of Canada Occidentalis - Gnaeus Iulius Caes
Salvete Senatores,

I am forwarding an application for the Propraetorship sent by Gnaeus
Iulius Caesar:


Cn. Iulius Caesar Consulibus S.P.D.

I wish to be considered for the position of Propraetor of Canada
Occidentalis, given the fact that Quintus Suetonius Paulinus has
declared his intention to step down. I have as you will note also
copied Suetonius Paulinus on this.

My declaration of candidacy for Quaestor contains much information
that is relevant to the skill set necessary for a propraetor, and I
reproduce it here:

"I am 44 years old and I have held the office of Scriba Propraetoris
and am currently a Legate of my province. I am also Praefectus
Retarius in the Sodalitas Militarium and Praefectus Retarius in
Sodalitas Egressus. Additionally I was appointed to the role of
Praefectus for the Outreach Program of Sodalitas Egressus and
Dominus Praefectus of the GO ROMAN project. I also have served this
year as Accensus to the Consul Gaius Popillius Laenas. I have also
been involved in the drafting of laws and am also paterfamilias of a
fairly sizeable family in Nova Roma.
I served 11 years as a police officer and am currently a manager
within a Justice Department. As well as being a "front line" police
officer I was also responsible for preparing the report for a new
policing area, station, manpower and equipment, which involved
months of research required by central government. This required
budgetary analysis and fiscal projection.
Within my current role I am responsible for managing a specific
budget of over $1 million, and also am involved in the planning
process for another budget of well over $10 million. Procurement,
financial analysis, projection, fraud control and asset management
also fall under my purview, as well as the responsibility of meeting
a specific financial recovery target of over $2.5 million.
I work frequently with the offices of the Ombudsman and the Auditor
General. I am also involved in the drafting of statutes and
regulations, as well as the creation of business plans, policies and
procedures. I also am responsible for critical incident recovery
policy management and serve on an appeals tribunal in job re-
classification labour disputes. I have an educational background in
computer language design and am actively involved in the running of
two family businesses."
I am currently serving as Quaestor to the Curule Aedile, C. Equitius
Cato.
If appointed it would be my intention to pursue the hard efforts of
Suetonius Paulinus to increase the provincial citizen roll, and to
that end would actively promote the GO ROMAN project in my province,
as Paulinus has committed to do so. In addition I would seek to
strengthen links with the local reenactment Legion, and other local
classical groups. I have managed people to one degree or another for
24 years. Numerically I have at times been responsible for the
direct administration of approximately 150 staff and the minimum has
been 6. Over the last 5 years the average has been about 30. I also
have frequent responsibility for the control of additional staff in
order to implement and execute projects. I have taken numerous sup
[ervisory and management courses both within the police and in the
government. I am also repsonsible for the recruitment and training
of new staff and remedial training for existing staff, and was a
divisional trainer for my police force.
Salvete
Cn. Iulius Caesar


Cn. Iulius Caesar Consulibus S.P.D.
Just to clarify - in respect of the Senatus Consultum de
Propraetores I meet all the conditions.

My service dates http://novaroma.org/bin/cpoints?id=7228 are
incorrect due to a glitch that affected all provinces - Marinus
Censor is aware that the dates have set to the 1st January 2006 and
don't reflect the actual appointments. My Propraetor, Suetonius
Paulinus can confirm these and one edict can be found on the
provincial webpage

http://www.canadaoccidentalis.org/edictum19.html

The dates of my appointments are:

29th March 2004, appointed as Scriba Propraetoris to my Propraetor
and a provincial Lictor with responsibility for citizenship on 8th
April 2004.
Appointed to the position of Praefectus Retiarius in Sodalitas
Militarium
Appointed to the position of Praefectus Retiarius in Sodalitas
Egressus.
On the 3rd October 2004, became paterfamilias of the whole Gens
Iulia and his own familia, as the successor to the then
materfamilias Iulia Vopisca.
On the 18th November 2004, raised to the rank of Legatus for the
Columbia region of Canada Occidentalis Provincia.
On the 27th November 2004, appointed Praefectus of the ongoing
Sodalitas Egressus Outreach Program.
On the 10th January 2005, appointed Accensus to the Consul Gaius
Popillius Laenas.
On the 30th May 2005, appointed Dominus Praefectus of the Sodalitas
Egressus GO ROMAN! project
On the 9th December 2005, appointed Beneficarius of Sodalitas
Egressus.
On the 1st January 2006, assumed the office of Quaestor having
successfully stood for election

Valete

Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41612 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-02-02
Subject: Re: Interest For Propraetor Of Canada Occidentalis - Gnaeus Iulius
Salve All
I , as Legate in Canada Occidentalis, whole heartedly support Cn. Iulius
Caesar, as our new Propraetor!..
Vale
Quintus Sertorius
Legate
Canada Occidentalis

----- Original Message -----
From: "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 9:40 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Interest For Propraetor Of Canada Occidentalis - Gnaeus
Iulius Caesar


> Salvete Senatores,
>
> I am forwarding an application for the Propraetorship sent by Gnaeus
> Iulius Caesar:
>
>
> Cn. Iulius Caesar Consulibus S.P.D.
>
> I wish to be considered for the position of Propraetor of Canada
> Occidentalis, given the fact that Quintus Suetonius Paulinus has
> declared his intention to step down. I have as you will note also
> copied Suetonius Paulinus on this.
>
> My declaration of candidacy for Quaestor contains much information
> that is relevant to the skill set necessary for a propraetor, and I
> reproduce it here:
>
> "I am 44 years old and I have held the office of Scriba Propraetoris
> and am currently a Legate of my province. I am also Praefectus
> Retarius in the Sodalitas Militarium and Praefectus Retarius in
> Sodalitas Egressus. Additionally I was appointed to the role of
> Praefectus for the Outreach Program of Sodalitas Egressus and
> Dominus Praefectus of the GO ROMAN project. I also have served this
> year as Accensus to the Consul Gaius Popillius Laenas. I have also
> been involved in the drafting of laws and am also paterfamilias of a
> fairly sizeable family in Nova Roma.
> I served 11 years as a police officer and am currently a manager
> within a Justice Department. As well as being a "front line" police
> officer I was also responsible for preparing the report for a new
> policing area, station, manpower and equipment, which involved
> months of research required by central government. This required
> budgetary analysis and fiscal projection.
> Within my current role I am responsible for managing a specific
> budget of over $1 million, and also am involved in the planning
> process for another budget of well over $10 million. Procurement,
> financial analysis, projection, fraud control and asset management
> also fall under my purview, as well as the responsibility of meeting
> a specific financial recovery target of over $2.5 million.
> I work frequently with the offices of the Ombudsman and the Auditor
> General. I am also involved in the drafting of statutes and
> regulations, as well as the creation of business plans, policies and
> procedures. I also am responsible for critical incident recovery
> policy management and serve on an appeals tribunal in job re-
> classification labour disputes. I have an educational background in
> computer language design and am actively involved in the running of
> two family businesses."
> I am currently serving as Quaestor to the Curule Aedile, C. Equitius
> Cato.
> If appointed it would be my intention to pursue the hard efforts of
> Suetonius Paulinus to increase the provincial citizen roll, and to
> that end would actively promote the GO ROMAN project in my province,
> as Paulinus has committed to do so. In addition I would seek to
> strengthen links with the local reenactment Legion, and other local
> classical groups. I have managed people to one degree or another for
> 24 years. Numerically I have at times been responsible for the
> direct administration of approximately 150 staff and the minimum has
> been 6. Over the last 5 years the average has been about 30. I also
> have frequent responsibility for the control of additional staff in
> order to implement and execute projects. I have taken numerous sup
> [ervisory and management courses both within the police and in the
> government. I am also repsonsible for the recruitment and training
> of new staff and remedial training for existing staff, and was a
> divisional trainer for my police force.
> Salvete
> Cn. Iulius Caesar
>
>
> Cn. Iulius Caesar Consulibus S.P.D.
> Just to clarify - in respect of the Senatus Consultum de
> Propraetores I meet all the conditions.
>
> My service dates http://novaroma.org/bin/cpoints?id=7228 are
> incorrect due to a glitch that affected all provinces - Marinus
> Censor is aware that the dates have set to the 1st January 2006 and
> don't reflect the actual appointments. My Propraetor, Suetonius
> Paulinus can confirm these and one edict can be found on the
> provincial webpage
>
> http://www.canadaoccidentalis.org/edictum19.html
>
> The dates of my appointments are:
>
> 29th March 2004, appointed as Scriba Propraetoris to my Propraetor
> and a provincial Lictor with responsibility for citizenship on 8th
> April 2004.
> Appointed to the position of Praefectus Retiarius in Sodalitas
> Militarium
> Appointed to the position of Praefectus Retiarius in Sodalitas
> Egressus.
> On the 3rd October 2004, became paterfamilias of the whole Gens
> Iulia and his own familia, as the successor to the then
> materfamilias Iulia Vopisca.
> On the 18th November 2004, raised to the rank of Legatus for the
> Columbia region of Canada Occidentalis Provincia.
> On the 27th November 2004, appointed Praefectus of the ongoing
> Sodalitas Egressus Outreach Program.
> On the 10th January 2005, appointed Accensus to the Consul Gaius
> Popillius Laenas.
> On the 30th May 2005, appointed Dominus Praefectus of the Sodalitas
> Egressus GO ROMAN! project
> On the 9th December 2005, appointed Beneficarius of Sodalitas
> Egressus.
> On the 1st January 2006, assumed the office of Quaestor having
> successfully stood for election
>
> Valete
>
> Caesar
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41613 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: Response to Lee Ann
A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque omnibus, praesertim
Lee Ann S.P.D.

I am pasting a message from Praetor Ahenobarbus below; as often happens,
Yahoo has determined that mail from the moderators is actually spam.
Sometimes they find the real spam, too...

=============================================

From: Kristoffer From
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 04:15:00 +0100
To: Lee-Ann
Subject: Re: a couple of questions

Lee-Ann wrote:
> My name is Lee-Ann and I am a writer, not published yet but sure
> giving it a try.
>
> My current WIP, work in progress, is set in Rome 195 CE and I am
> looking for either a person, persons or a group who would be willing
> be answer all of my questions, and believe me some are more than
> likely to be stupid. The main character is a female gladiator...and I
> know that Emperor Severus allowed females until 200 CE.
>
> Mostly I would be looking for someone I can run "ideas" by to see if
> it was feasible, could be done, would have been done etc. I have done
> some research already and have some rough ideas but I would really
> appreciate having a professional to check things.
>
> The only thing I could offer in return would be acknowledgements in
> my book "when" I get published.
>
> I sent this to you personally because I don't want to annoy anyone.
> Actually I don't want to annoy you either. If this group is the wrong
> group, I apologize in advance.

Hi,

I'm thinking you've found the right spot. Among our members, we count
not a few historians, amateur as well as professional, all with a
genuine interest in Roman history.

Not only that, but there are one or two aspiring writers - as last
year's Certamen Petronianum, an international writing contest organized
by the Aediles - demonstrated. With Dr. Colleen McCullough and Prof.
Peter Wiseman as judges, the Certamen attracted a large number of writers.

http://www.novaroma.org/certamen/

Now, to get in touch with members of the list, you can either join
yourself and ask for interested, and I'm sure you'll get a response, or
if you prefer, I can forward your e-mail to the list.

As an incentive to get you to join yourself, as we are quite happy to
provide a gathering place for anyone interested in Rome, there are
numerous reenactors with more than their fair share of knowledge of
Roman-era combat.

Click this link to join:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/join

Or, if you prefer, I could send you an e-mail invite.

Vale, Kristoffer From/Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus.



===============================================

And Praetor T.O.P.A. has modestly failed to note that he won said
contest...

You may also be interested in the gladiatorial section of the Legio XXIV
website at <http://www.legionxxiv.org/>, and in joining our Sodalitas
Militarium and/or our Sodalitas Munerum. The former deals with military
matters, but touches on gladiatorial ones, and the latter is devoted
entirely to gladiatorial ones (though I am not a member of the latter and
cannot speak authoritatively on it).

Vale, et ualete,

ATS


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41614 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF POSITION AS EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM OF AQUILA
> A. Tullia Scholastica Proconsuli Francisco Apulo Caesari quiritibusque omnibus
> s.p.d.
>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> I would clarify my position because my name appeared in the
> following schedule. I'm the man called "Mr. Valenzano".
> If you would further information about my role in this sad history,
> please contact me.
>
> About this sad history, I'm very sad of this misunderstanding
> forcing a skilled citizen to resign. This is another terrible hole
> of this organization.
> What I ask is why the "wrong Germanicus" talked with Illustrus
> Cassius Philippus about a matter where he isn't entitled to do it.
>
> ATS: From what I gather, Vedius didn¹t talk with M. Cassius Philippus AT
> ALL, but let him persist in the delusion that he, Vedius, was the person to
> whom such matters should be referred. Now, perhaps there is some good reason
> why he didn¹t answer Philippus¹ notes, but at present, it seems hard to find.
> This is no comedy, but there are plenty of errors all around. If Vedius had
> answered MCP, however briefly, the latter wouldn¹t have believed that he was
> being ignored by the most relevant party; if MCP had been aware that several
> citizens bear the cognomen Germanicus, and that at least two of them are quite
> prominent in their own ways, as well as distinguished by nomen, he also
> wouldn¹t have persisted in trying to contact someone who might be the wrong
> party, and wouldn¹t have become unbearably frustrated, as was certainly likely
> in this situation. Guys, it bears saying again: ³Evil communications corrupt
> good manners.²
>
> Maybe the "wrong Germanicus" should ask the apologies of Philippus
> and we should ignore the resignation of the Editor and permit him to
> continue his job as well as correct.
>
> ATS: I would definitely encourage my friend and student M. Cassius
> Philippus to reconsider. Obviously, he wasn¹t being ignored by the people who
> had the access he had to have; he was being ignored by someone who had no such
> power, but who should have graciously sent him a two-line e-mail saying in
> effect, Œhey, fella, you got the wrong guy. Here¹s the one you should have
> pinged.¹
>
> You haven¹t crossed the Rubicon, Phil, you crossed e-mails with the wrong
> guy.
>
> Calm down. You have some great ideas for the Aquila, and your graphics
> background would add another dimension to this publication. Think it
> o-o-o-o-o-ver.
>
>
> Valete
> Franciscus Apulus Caesar
> aka "Mr. Valenzano"
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Phil Perez" <senseiphil@...>
> wrote:
>> >
>> > Salve Cato,
>> >
>> > None? This is a little puzzling. Philippus Cassius, to whom did
> you
>> > write in your attempts to access the "Aquila"?
>> >
>> > What's done is done. I made some mistakes myself, but I've had
> enough. This is my last posting on this topic - Sorry, I'm sick of
> it, its been going on for a month. Here is the list and dates:
>> >
>> > 1. Jan 8 My initial request was put to Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> after he congratulated me and offered some good tips. His response:
> see Senator Audens about it since he was the outgoing editor. Here
> is where the bureaucratic run-around started.
>> > 2. Jan. 10 e-mailed Senator Audens through Nova Britannia's Yahoo
> group (I had not received any responses from him in quite a while
> via his regular e-mail address and I presumed it was not working;
>> > 3. Jan. 11 e-mailed Senator Audens again off-list to his regular
> e-mail address in response to his response about it (He seemed to be
> upset with me for not doing it off-list to start with);
>> > 4. Jan. 17 another e-mail back and forth to Senator Audens about
> it;
>> > 5. Jan 18 yet another e-mail to Senator Audens about my concerns;
>> > 6. Jan. 20 again;
>> > 7. Jan. 25 e-mailed Mr. Valenzano about it after finally finding
> out from Senator Audens that he (Mr. Valenzano) did the downloads
> and he would be able to help me out;
>> > 8. Jan. 25 sent an e-mail to Germanicus about it after being told
> by Mr. Valenzano that he (Mr. Valenzano) had no authority to share
> that information with me and only the website owner - Germanicus
> could provide me with it.
>> > 9. Jan. 28 yet another e-mail to Germanicus after he failed to
> address this issue in his response to me. (I have yet to receive one
> from him about it to date!)
>> > 10. Jan. 30 One last e-mail to Senator Audens making him aware (at
> his previous request) of my pending resignation if I chose that
> option.
>> >
>> > Valete,
>> > Marcus Cassius Philippus
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41615 From: Lee-Ann Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: Re: Response to Lee Ann
Hi

Sure enough, the original email was classified as spam so I appreciate this email.

Could you let Kristoffer know that I've joined the group. I may be quiet for a bit. I want to read some messages, try and get a handle on all the names (which is one of my problems at the moment in the WIP as well)

Again, thanks and you'll all be hearing from me soon.





Lee-Ann
j_wife@...

Believe in yourself for if you don't, who will?


















---------------------------------
Find your next car at Yahoo! Canada Autos

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41616 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: a.d III Non. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem III Nonas Februarius; haec dies nefastus est.


"Many military exploits are related of him, but the greatest are those
which I shall now narrate, beginning with the war against the Albans.
The man responsible for the quarrel between the two cities and the
severing of their bond of kinship was an Alban named Cluilius, who had
been honoured with the chief magistracy; this man, vexed at the
prosperity of the Romans and unable to contain his envy, and being by
nature headstrong and somewhat inclined to madness, resolved to
involve the cities in war with each other. But not seeing how he
could persuade the Albans to permit him to lead an army against the
Romans without just and urgent reasons, he contrived a plan of the
following sort: he permitted the poorest and boldest of the Albans to
pillage the fields of the Romans, promising them immunity, and so
caused many to overrun the neighbouring territory in a series of
plundering raids, as they would now be pursuing without danger gains
from which they would never desist even under the constraint of fear.
In doing this he was following a very natural line of reasoning, as
the event bore witness. For he assumed that the Romans would not
submit to being plundered but would rush to arms, and he would thus
have an opportunity of accusing them to his people as the aggressors
in the war; and he also believed that the majority of the Albans,
envying the prosperity of their colony, would gladly listen to these
false accusations and would begin war against the Romans. And that is
just what happened. For when the worst elements of each city fell to
robbing and plundering each other and at last a Roman army made an
incursion into the territory of the Albans and killed or took prisoner
many of the bandits, Cluilius assembled the people and inveighed
against the Romans at great length, showed them many who were wounded,
produced the relations of those who had been seized or slain, and at
the same time added other circumstances of his own invention;
whereupon it was voted on his motion to send an embassy first of all
to demand satisfaction for what had happened, and then, if the Romans
refused it, to begin war against them." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus,
Roman Antiquities 3.2



"Trembling with fear, Arion said: `I don't plead for life,
But let me take up my lyre and play a little.'
They granted it, laughing at the delay. He took the wreath
That might have graced your tresses, Phoebus:
Put on his robe, twice-stained with Tyrian purple:
And, plucked by his thumb, the strings gave out their music,
Such a melody as the swan's mournful measures,
When the cruel shaft has transfixed its brow.
At once, he plunged, fully clothed into the waves:
The water, leaping, splashed the sky-blue stern.
Then (beyond belief) they say a dolphin
Yielded its back to the unaccustomed weight.
Sitting there, Arion gripped the lyre, and paid his fare
In song, soothing the ocean waves with his singing.
The gods see good deeds: Jupiter took the dolphin
And ordered its constellation to contain nine stars." - Ovid, Fasti
II: 3 February

"Then was there heard a most celestial sound
Of dainty music which did next ensue,
And, on the floating waters as enthroned,
Arion with his harp unto him drew
The ears and hearts of all that goodly crew;
Even when as yet the dolphin which him bore
Through the Aegean Seas from pirates' view,
Stood still, by him astonished at his love,
And all the raging seas for joy forgot to roar." - Edmund Spenser

Arion was a musician from the court of King Periander of Corinth;
sources indicate that the two may have also been lovers. Against
Periander's wishes, Arion decided to enter a musical contest in
Sicily. He won, and was returning home by ship with his prize, when
the sailors on the ship decided that they could put his winnings to
better use than he could. Afraid of the wrath of Periander, however,
they were reluctant to actually kill him; instead, they ordered him to
jump off the ship in the middle of the ocean. His last request was to
play his lyre before he leaped to a watery grave, and the sailors
allowed it.

Arion's playing was the most beautiful music ever heard on earth, in
heaven, or under the earth; it was so beautiful that it drew a school
of dolphins to the side of the ship, and they leapt and played in the
ship's wake. Upon finishing, Arion threw himself overboard --- only
to be picked up by a dolphin and carried, on its back, to safety. He
made it back to Corinth and Periander, the sailors' wickedness was
exposed (they were banished forever), and the dolphin was rewarded by
being placed among the celestial bodies by Iuppiter to mark its
kindness forever.

"Arion the Immortal" is also a character from DC Comics, but has
little or no relation to the Arion of the Greek story, as far as I know.


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Ovid, Edmund Spenser
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41617 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: Lentulus reversus
Cn. Lentulus quaestor & propraetor Quiritibus sal.:

I have totally finished the Hungarian translation of the 7th book of the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian. I am very happy and proud: this work will be edited by one of the most prestigious Hungarian publisher. In the translation teachers from the university have participated and one or two students beyond me; the 12 books of the Institutio Oratoria will be compiled by Professor Tamas Adamik who is the most appreciated Hungarian scholar in the rhetorics, and he himself translates some of the 12 books.

Thank to those, who have been flurried so that I can finish this work. It was a bit delayed, but there was no problem, Professor Adamik had given me more time.

Now I can return to my quaestorial and propraetorial (and other) duties!

Valete!


Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
Q U A E S T O R
-------------------------------
Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
Provincial Sacerdos
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae Scholasticae Senior
Sodalis Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Latinista, Classicus Philologus


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41618 From: Iulia Caesaris Cytheris Aege Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: Re: Path of Glory
Salve Apollonius Cordus et salvete omnes!

My mistake,indeed.Thank you for the correction.
Your observation is actually very important because there is a problem that should be discussed.There are many persons who provide false information when they join Nova Roma and what these people do is send messages similar to the one that fuelled the entire discussion about 'path of glory'. i wonder why is this possible? Nova Roma site contains a detailed presentation of this organisation's aims. And now i ask you : higlighting the negative facts of history in the detriment of all the glorious and remarkable achivements is part of our goals?
I do not mind when i receive corrections.i am a student and i have all the respect for professors.I do not claim that i am perfect and i know that there are many things that i still have to learn. but why do i feel that right now i am invited to drink a cup of sweet and poisoned wine?


valete,
Iulia cytheris Aege



"A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...> wrote:
A. Apollonius Juliae Cytheri omnibusque sal.

> I cannot agree neither with Apollonius Octavio...

Neither can I, because this person doesn't exist. The
words you disagree with were written by Sex. Octavius
Lepidus. I replied to him, quoting his words, and my
reply began with the greeting "A. Apollonius Sex.
Octavio omnibusque sal.", which means "Aulus
Apollonius [that's me] greets Sextus Octavius [that's
him] and everybody".



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com


SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





Qui dedit beneficium taceat; narrat qui accepit. (L. Annaeus Seneca)


Iulia Iulia Caesaris Cytheris Aege
Provincial Sacerdos
Legatus Internis Rebus Provincia Dacia.




---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41619 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: Re: Lentulus reversus
Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus wrote:
> I have totally finished the Hungarian translation of the 7th book of
> the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian. I am very happy and proud:
> this work will be edited by one of the most prestigious Hungarian
> publisher. In the translation teachers from the university have
> participated and one or two students beyond me; the 12 books of the
> Institutio Oratoria will be compiled by Professor Tamas Adamik who is
> the most appreciated Hungarian scholar in the rhetorics, and he
> himself translates some of the 12 books.

Salve, Gnaee Corneli Lentule.

Congratulations on finishing such a massive undertaking! Translating the
Roman authors is a great way to make Roman culture available to modern
people, which is really what Nova Roma is all about.

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41620 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: Re: Path of Glory
SALVE AMICA !

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Iulia Caesaris Cytheris Aege
<cytheris_aege@...> wrote:

i am a student and i have all the respect for professors.I do not
claim that i am perfect and i know that there are many things that i
still have to learn. but why do i feel that right now i am invited to
drink a cup of sweet and poisoned wine? >>>

No, amica. You are not invited to drink a cup of sweet and poisoned
wine. You are, as a lot of us, the good part of NR. Your sensibility,
your elegance and honest hard are the prove of your dedication and
exceptional roman attitude.
Don't forget, here, to the roman limes, an entire legion is near you.

With respect,
IVL SABINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41621 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: Re: Lentulus reversus
Cn. Lentulus quaestor T. Octavio praetori suo sal.:

>>> Congratulations on finishing such a massive undertaking! Translating the Roman authors is a great way to make Roman culture available to modern people, which is really what Nova Roma is all about. <<<

Thank you very much, Praetor! There is another great way to make Roman culture available: with teaching Latin! :-)

Cura uti valeas!
LENTVLVS QVAESTOR


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41622 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-02-03
Subject: Re: Lentulus reversus
SALVE CORNELI LENTULE !

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
<cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
> I have totally finished the Hungarian translation of the 7th
book of the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian. I am very happy and
proud: this work will be edited by one of the most prestigious
Hungarian publisher. In the translation teachers from the university
have participated and one or two students beyond me; the 12 books of
the Institutio Oratoria will be compiled by Professor Tamas Adamik
who is the most appreciated Hungarian scholar in the rhetorics, and
he himself translates some of the 12 books.
> Thank to those, who have been flurried so that I can finish this
work. It was a bit delayed, but there was no problem, Professor
Adamik had given me more time.
> Now I can return to my quaestorial and propraetorial (and other)
duties!>>>

Congratulations. I'm sure it was a hard work but with a lot of
satisfactions. It's a prove, in the same time, of your dedication
for the roman history and culture.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41623 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: Lentulus reversus
> Cn. Cornelio Lentulo quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque omnibus A. Tullia
> Scholastica S.P.D.
>
> Cn. Lentulus quaestor & propraetor Quiritibus sal.:
>
> I have totally finished the Hungarian translation of the 7th book of the
> Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian. I am very happy and proud: this work will
> be edited by one of the most prestigious Hungarian publisher.
>
> ATS: Macte uirtute!
>
> In the translation teachers from the university have participated and one or
> two students beyond me; the 12 books of the Institutio Oratoria will be
> compiled by Professor Tamas Adamik who is the most appreciated Hungarian
> scholar in the rhetorics, and he himself translates some of the 12 books.
>
> Thank to those, who have been flurried so that I can finish this work. It
> was a bit delayed, but there was no problem, Professor Adamik had given me
> more time.
>
> Now I can return to my quaestorial and propraetorial (and other) duties!
>
> ATS: Possisne totum situm interretialem uertere? (In Latinum, scilicet)
> ;-)
>
> Valete!
>
>
> Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
> Q U A E S T O R
> -------------------------------
> Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
> Provincial Sacerdos
> Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae Scholasticae Senior
> Sodalis Sodalitatis Latinitatis
> Latinista, Classicus Philologus
>
>
> ---------------------------------

Vale, et ualete,

A. Tullia Scholastica



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41624 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: Response to Lee Ann
> Hello, Lee Ann, et saluete, omnes!
>
> Hi
>
> Sure enough, the original email was classified as spam so I appreciate this
> email.
>
> ATS: I trust you¹re addressing me...
>
> Could you let Kristoffer know that I've joined the group.
>
> ATS: Kristoffer is generally better known as Titus Octavius Pius
> Ahenobarbus, or TOPA. We all take Roman names and use them in our
> correspondence with other citizens and the world at large. Which group did
> you mean? He posts here, and belongs here. He¹s a praetor, or judge, in our
> government, part of whose duties include moderating this list. I¹m one of his
> assistants, who also has that duty. Did you mean that you joined the Legio
> XXIV socii (affiliates) list, or the sodalitas munerum, or what? We¹d welcome
> you in the Sodalitas Musarum, which is our literary SIG.
>
> I may be quiet for a bit. I want to read some messages, try and get a handle
> on all the names (which is one of my problems at the moment in the WIP as
> well)
>
> ATS: Yes, this is a big list‹and over half of the members of the list, by
> definition, aren¹t members, or as we call ourselves, citizens, of Nova Roma,
> nor are all citizens members of this list‹which can get rather rough at times.
>
> Again, thanks and you'll all be hearing from me soon.
>
> ATS: We hope you will stick around and learn‹you¹ve come to a good place to
> learn about ancient Rome, though that is more a function of our SIG lists and
> our beginners¹ list, NewRoman, than is this one, which is the home of our
> rough and ready political life.
>
> Vale,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
>
>
> Lee-Ann
> j_wife@...
>
> Believe in yourself for if you don't, who will?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41625 From: Maior Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: Lentulus reversus
M. Hortensia Maior. G. Cornelio Lentulo spd;
Euge! many congratulations at finishing such a worthy
endeavor Lentule, I hope this leads many cives of Pannonia to enjoy
the Classics & study Latin, but then they would not need your
excellent translation! [ioculus est ].
I for my part take this seriously and am applying myself at
Magister Avitus' Spoken Latin course. I look forward to the day when I
speak to you in Latin!
bene valete
Marca Hortensia Maior

I have totally finished the Hungarian translation of the 7th book of
the
> > Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian. I am very happy and proud: this
work will
> > be edited by one of the most prestigious Hungarian publisher.
> >
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41626 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: prid. Non. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est pridie Nonas Februarius; haec dies nefastus est.

"Upon the arrival of the ambassadors at Rome, Tullius, suspecting that
they had come to demand satisfaction, resolved to anticipate them in
doing this, since he wished to turn upon the Albans the blame for
breaking the compact between them and their colony. For there existed
a treaty between the two cities which had been made in the reign of
Romulus, wherein, among other articles, it was stipulated that neither
of them should begin a war, but if either complained of any injury
whatsoever, that city would demand satisfaction from the city which
had done the injury, and failing to obtain it, should then make war as
a matter of necessity, the treaty being looked upon as already broken.
Tullius, therefore, taking care that the Romans should not be the
first called upon to give satisfaction and, by refusing it, become
guilty in the eyes of the Albans, ordered the most distinguished of
his friends to entertain the ambassadors of the Albans with every
courtesy and to detain them inside their homes while he himself,
pretending to be occupied with some necessary business, put off their
audience. The following night he sent to Alba some Romans of
distinction, duly instructed as to the course they should pursue,
together with the fetiales, to demand satisfaction from the Albans for
the injuries the Romans had received. These, having performed their
journey before sunrise, found Cluilius in the market-place at the time
when the early morning crowd was gathered there. And having set forth
the injuries which the Romans had received at the hands of the Albans,
they demanded that he should act in conformity with the compact
between the cities. But Cluilius, alleging that the Albans had been
first in sending envoys to Rome to demand satisfaction and had not
even been vouchsafed an answer, ordered the Romans to depart, on the
ground that they had violated the terms of the treaty, and declared
war against them. The chief of the embassy, however, as he was
departing, demanded from Cluilius an answer to just this one question,
namely, whether he admitted that those were violating the treaty who,
being the first called upon to give satisfaction, had refused to
comply with any part of their obligation. And when Cluilius said he
did, he exclaimed: 'Well, then, I call the gods, whom we made
witnesses of our treaty, to witness that the Romans, having been the
first to be refused satisfaction, will be undertaking a just war
against the violators of that treaty, and that it is you Albans who
have avoided giving satisfaction, as the events themselves show. For
you, being the first called upon for satisfaction, have refused it and
you have been the first to declare war against us. Look, therefore,
for vengeance to come upon you ere long with the sword.' Tullius,
having learned of all this from the ambassadors upon their return to
Rome, then ordered the Albans to be brought before him and to state
the reasons for their coming; and when they had delivered the message
entrusted to them by Cluilius and were threatening war in case they
did not obtain satisfaction, he replied: 'I have anticipated you in
doing this, and having obtained nothing that the treaty directs, I
declare against the Albans the war that is both necessary and just.'"
- Dionysius of Halicarnassus 3.2


February is dedicated to the god Mars and Iuno in her aspect as Iuno
Sospita. Mars was initially a god of springtime and fertility before
he was a god of war. The first god Romans (and Italians) recognised as
the chief of all the divinities, he was associated with Iuppiter (who
later became top god) and Quirinus. These three shared an ancient
sanctuary housed in the Regia in the Roman forum.

Although often associated with the Greek Ares, Mars is separate. Not a
bellacose bringer of war like Ares, Mars is instead the protector of
the Roman people, in agriculture as well as in war. Additionally, in
the Roman tradition Mars was conceived by the Queen of Heaven alone.
According to Ovid Mars was conceived by Iuno via a flower with fertile
properties which the goddess Flora obtained for her.

He was the protector of agriculture who lived in forests and
mountains. The first month of the Roman calendar, Martius, which
originally began on the vernal equinox, honored the god and marked the
annual return of life to the Earth, as this was the season for
planting crops. For a time Mars was both an agricultural and military
deity, thus symbolizing the duality of the Roman citizen as both
farmer and soldier. Eventually, Mars transferred his agricultural
duties to Ceres and Liber, and his chief concern became that of
protecting the Roman state in time of war, much as among mortals the
defense of the state passed out of the hands of a militia --
temporarily raised from the agrarian citizenry to meet an immediate
threat -- and instead became the responsibility of a huge standing
army of professional soldiers. As god of war Mars was accompanied by
the goddess Bellona.

The sacrarium of Mars stood on the Palatine Hill in the Roma Quadrata
of Romulus, and this is where his sacred spears and shields, the
symbolic armory of the Roman state, were kept. At first there was only
one shield, dropped from the sky by Mars to the second Roman king Numa
Pompilius as a token of his benevolence, but in order to insure
against theft or destruction, Numa had eleven identical shields made.
The twelve shields were then placed under the stewardship of the
Salii, a college of twelve priests created by Numa for that purpose.
The Salii ("jumpers"), who served both Quirinus and Mars, derived
their name from the procession through the streets of the city which
they completed by jumping the entire way and singing the Carmen
Saliare. Primitively the rites of the Salii were intended to protect
the growth of plants. Mars' own priest was called the flamen
Martialis. In the Regia on the Forum Romanum, the hastae Martiae
("lances of Mars") were kept. When these lances moved, it was seen as
a portent of war. Whenever war broke out, it was the consul's
ceremonial duty to shake the sacred spears and shout "Mars vigila!"
("Mars, wake up!").


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Mars (http://www.ancientsites.com)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41627 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: Path of Glory
A. Apollonius Juliae Cytheri omnibusque sal.

> Your observation is actually very
> important because there is a problem that should be
> discussed.There are many persons who provide false
> information when they join Nova Roma and what these
> people do is send messages similar to the one that
> fuelled the entire discussion about 'path of glory'.
> i wonder why is this possible? Nova Roma site
> contains a detailed presentation of this
> organisation's aims. And now i ask you : higlighting
> the negative facts of history in the detriment of
> all the glorious and remarkable achivements is part
> of our goals?

I'm not sure what you mean by "persons who provide
false information when they join Nova Roma" - do you
mean that these people give false information on their
applications to join Nova Roma, for example false
names, false addresses, false dates of birth?

If this is what you're concerned about, it's a very
reasonable worry. There is, to be honest, not very
much we can do about people giving false information
like this. Information which is obviously false can be
detected by the censorial office, and these
applications are rejected. But the censores and their
assistants have no way to know whether a person who
says his name is "John Smith" really is called John
Smith or not.

However, it's important to say that it is an offence
under our laws to provide such false information, and
if a person is discovered to have lied on his
application form he can be punished (lex Salicia
poenalis article XVI). But I don't think there is any
reason to believe that Sex. Octavius Lepidus lied on
his application form.

Now, you go on to say that these people "send messages
similar to the one that fuelled the entire discussion
about 'path of glory'". I honestly don't understand
the connection between providing false information and
sending messages like the one we're talking about.
Could you explain?

You seem to be criticising what Sex. Octavius said,
and suggesting that it was "highlighting the negative
facts of history". I must say that I don't see a
problem with what he said. As I understood his words,
what he was saying is this: 'In ancient times, famous
Romans achieved glory by leading armies to victory in
battle. Today there are few of us who have the
opportunity to lead armies into battle, and in any
case warfare is not seen as glorious today in the same
way that it was in antiquity. So what can we do now to
achieve glory?' I don't think his words implied any
praise for warfare, and certainly not any suggestion
that we should use warfare to achieve glory. He was
merely exploring the differences between ancient Rome
and the modern world. That is, surely, a very
reasonable thing to talk about.

It's true that the conversation which followed from
his message was different from what he seems to have
intended. Some people said some things about warfare
which you and I may disagree with. But that is not his
fault: what he himself said is, I think, entirely
sensible.

You ask whether "highlighting the negative facts of
history in the detriment of all the glorious and
remarkable achievements is part of our goals". I don't
think it is part of our goals, but that doesn't mean
that it should not be allowed. We claim to be the
restorers of ancient Roman civilization. So people are
entitled, I think, to point out that Roman
civilization was not all good. Roman history is our
history, and we must face up to our history. You're
right to say that we should emphasise "all the
glorious and remarkable achievements" of Roman
history, but that doesn't mean that we should ignore
the bad things. What Sex. Octavius said is true:
ancient Roman culture was in some ways very
militaristic, and ancient Romans thought of warfare as
a glorious thing. We claim to be the heirs of ancient
Rome, and yet we explicitly disclaim warfare. This is
an important tension, and I cannot see anything wrong
with pointing it out as Sex. Octavius did.

Finally, you say:

> I do not mind when i receive
> corrections.i am a student and i have all the
> respect for professors.I do not claim that i am
> perfect and i know that there are many things that i
> still have to learn. but why do i feel that right
> now i am invited to drink a cup of sweet and
> poisoned wine?

I'm afraid I don't quite understand what you mean.
Perhaps it's because I am not a very poetic soul and
I'm not very good at metaphors. What is this poisoned
cup, and who is asking you to drink it?



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41628 From: Iulia Caesaris Cytheris Aege Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: Path of Glory
Salve et salvete!

i am afraid that i did not express my ideas clearly enough.i
was not reffering to our fellow citizen, but to the so called
dacian. of course that everyone is entitled to have an opinion. what
somehow disturbed me is the fact that i noticed a reluctant tendency
towards my words.i truely belived that i am roman and that most
people here share the same feeling.it causes distress to be given as
a negative example when it was not the case. with all the respect
for your knowledge and teaching skills, was my mistake so much worse
that what Nicetus affirmed?
as for the false identity issues, again, i was not
reffering to Sex. Octavius and i am not criticizing what he said
about the military aspects. seeds of discordia are planted by people
who do not actually belong to any province and who come up with
affirmations which might turn out to be offending.you have my name
and my address and if i make such affirmations i take full
resposibility for what i say.this should be valid for absolutely all
citizens.
i want to make it very clear that i have absolutely nothing
against Sex. Octavius. i invite him to respond my email and continue
the discussion about all the possible interpretations of the concept
of "glory".
i cannot help it being a poetic soul. and i must thank
Apollo for such a gift.as for my metaphor...i could but explain it
by means of more and more metaphores.i'd rather not. there are more
important matters concerning the wellfare of this organisation that
are to be discussed.


de bene omnibus nobis,
Iulia Caesaris Cytheris Aege


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@...> wrote:
>
> A. Apollonius Juliae Cytheri omnibusque sal.
>
> > Your observation is actually very
> > important because there is a problem that should be
> > discussed.There are many persons who provide false
> > information when they join Nova Roma and what these
> > people do is send messages similar to the one that
> > fuelled the entire discussion about 'path of glory'.
> > i wonder why is this possible? Nova Roma site
> > contains a detailed presentation of this
> > organisation's aims. And now i ask you : higlighting
> > the negative facts of history in the detriment of
> > all the glorious and remarkable achivements is part
> > of our goals?
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "persons who provide
> false information when they join Nova Roma" - do you
> mean that these people give false information on their
> applications to join Nova Roma, for example false
> names, false addresses, false dates of birth?
>
> If this is what you're concerned about, it's a very
> reasonable worry. There is, to be honest, not very
> much we can do about people giving false information
> like this. Information which is obviously false can be
> detected by the censorial office, and these
> applications are rejected. But the censores and their
> assistants have no way to know whether a person who
> says his name is "John Smith" really is called John
> Smith or not.
>
> However, it's important to say that it is an offence
> under our laws to provide such false information, and
> if a person is discovered to have lied on his
> application form he can be punished (lex Salicia
> poenalis article XVI). But I don't think there is any
> reason to believe that Sex. Octavius Lepidus lied on
> his application form.
>
> Now, you go on to say that these people "send messages
> similar to the one that fuelled the entire discussion
> about 'path of glory'". I honestly don't understand
> the connection between providing false information and
> sending messages like the one we're talking about.
> Could you explain?
>
> You seem to be criticising what Sex. Octavius said,
> and suggesting that it was "highlighting the negative
> facts of history". I must say that I don't see a
> problem with what he said. As I understood his words,
> what he was saying is this: 'In ancient times, famous
> Romans achieved glory by leading armies to victory in
> battle. Today there are few of us who have the
> opportunity to lead armies into battle, and in any
> case warfare is not seen as glorious today in the same
> way that it was in antiquity. So what can we do now to
> achieve glory?' I don't think his words implied any
> praise for warfare, and certainly not any suggestion
> that we should use warfare to achieve glory. He was
> merely exploring the differences between ancient Rome
> and the modern world. That is, surely, a very
> reasonable thing to talk about.
>
> It's true that the conversation which followed from
> his message was different from what he seems to have
> intended. Some people said some things about warfare
> which you and I may disagree with. But that is not his
> fault: what he himself said is, I think, entirely
> sensible.
>
> You ask whether "highlighting the negative facts of
> history in the detriment of all the glorious and
> remarkable achievements is part of our goals". I don't
> think it is part of our goals, but that doesn't mean
> that it should not be allowed. We claim to be the
> restorers of ancient Roman civilization. So people are
> entitled, I think, to point out that Roman
> civilization was not all good. Roman history is our
> history, and we must face up to our history. You're
> right to say that we should emphasise "all the
> glorious and remarkable achievements" of Roman
> history, but that doesn't mean that we should ignore
> the bad things. What Sex. Octavius said is true:
> ancient Roman culture was in some ways very
> militaristic, and ancient Romans thought of warfare as
> a glorious thing. We claim to be the heirs of ancient
> Rome, and yet we explicitly disclaim warfare. This is
> an important tension, and I cannot see anything wrong
> with pointing it out as Sex. Octavius did.
>
> Finally, you say:
>
> > I do not mind when i receive
> > corrections.i am a student and i have all the
> > respect for professors.I do not claim that i am
> > perfect and i know that there are many things that i
> > still have to learn. but why do i feel that right
> > now i am invited to drink a cup of sweet and
> > poisoned wine?
>
> I'm afraid I don't quite understand what you mean.
> Perhaps it's because I am not a very poetic soul and
> I'm not very good at metaphors. What is this poisoned
> cup, and who is asking you to drink it?
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all
new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41629 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Praetorian Edict V
Praetorian Edict V

We, the Praetors of Nova Roma, do hereby define the guidelines for
appropriate usage of Nova Roma's public communication fora. These
guidelines are based on those previously issued by our predecessors.
However, as Praetors of Nova Roma, we reserve the right to change
them at any time. Any corrections or other Forum-related matters
including complaints should be sent to us at praetors@....

I. The Nova Roma main forum (herein referred to as 'the forum') is
set up so that replies are automatically sent to the entire forum.

Please keep this in mind when you are replying. You are not issuing a
private email. If your reply is intended for only one member, and
has no benefit to the rest of the list subscribers, send it privately
instead.

II. Topics of Discussion. The main focus of this list is Nova Roma
and Roma Antiqua

However, as members of a diverse international community we all have
lives and interests outside of Nova Roma. It is perfectly acceptable
to discuss non-Roman topics here, though keep in mind that not
everyone may share your interest in these topics.

As a courtesy to others. please place this notice, [OFF TOPIC] in the
subject field on all posts that do not have a direct application to
Nova Roma and Roma Antiqua. The main reason for asking this is that
Nova Roman magistrates see a LARGE amount of posts and if they
can put some aside as not of immediate importance they can do their
job better. If at any time the Praetors or their representatives ask
for an off topic thread to be terminated, further postings may lead
to moderation.

III. Posts that merely voice agreement with a previous post without
expanding on an issue in any way are discouraged.

IV. TRIM your posts. When replying to a thread, snip unnecessary
sections of the original post for brevity, and indicate where you
have done so by printing <snipped> at the appropriate place. Correct
usage of snipping prevents large posts that can quickly fill
subscribers' mailboxes.

V. If you feel you must dispute or criticize another person's post,
consider doing so in private. Sometimes a person makes a genuine
mistake, and your gentle correction via private email will have far
more effect than embarrassing them in the forum over what may have
been an innocent error. We know that during political debates,
private exchanges are impractical. Please use discretion in this
area.

VI. It is entirely appropriate to disagree publicly with another's
stated views or actions, including the actions of Nova Roma's
Magistrates, Senate or other appointed officials. Nova Roma is an
organization of individuals from a wide variety of nations,
religions, cultural backgrounds and political viewpoints, and it is
only reasonable that our views should differ. However, we urge you to
consider the following when expressing disagreement of opposing
viewpoints:

Express respect for the person and their entitlement to an opinion,
as well as faith in his or her good intentions. Point out the
specific areas in which you do not agree; generalized criticism is
often seen as an insult. Specific criticism can also help the person
you're responding to correct the error - this becomes very important
if you're writing to a magistrate. Quote the message number of the
post in which you base your account and opinions, or include
sufficient context from the post to which you're replying. In an
academic debate, endeavor to offer references to back up your
assertions. At all times maintain politeness in the expression of
your opinion and endeavor to respect the rights and opinions of
others.

Inappropriate behavior includes: The use of profane language;
misrepresentation of the truth for the purpose of making another
person look foolish; name-calling; criticizing a poster's personal
character as opposed to criticizing his ideas; making derogatory,
belittling, subjective statements about the Gods and Goddesses of
Rome or belittling deities of other religions (however, quoting from
a myth or historical material is allowed.)

Further, in the interests of protecting our younger citizens,
sexual references must be strictly within the context of an
historical discussion. Otherwise, they are to be made in private.
Advertisement of unsolicited goods and services (a.k.a. UCE or spam)
is not permitted in the Nova Roma Forum , unless the advertiser is a
member of Nova Roma's marketplace,the Macellum.

Macellum merchants are welcome to advertise from time
to time in a low-key fashion. Permitted forms of this include a
standard email signature (commonly defined by netiquette as a
four-line maximum), a one-time announcement of initial affiliation
with the Macellum, advertising in response to a post of inquiry made
in the forum, or an ad once per quarter advertising your presence in
the Macellum.

VII. If you feel that a post is inappropriate in any way, consider
mailing the individual concerned privately, explaining your rationale
for grievance and asking for clarification. You may also contact the
Praetors directly if you cannot resolve the issue privately.

VIII. During the time leading up to elections this list is one of the
forums where candidates express their views and present their
qualifications to the populace. All of the strictures governing
appropriate behavior previously mentioned shall remain in place and
apply to all candidates and their supporters.

IX. Please do not give out any personal information (i.e., address,
phone number, etc.) on the list. Remember that you're posting in a
public forum, and maintain due regard for your own safety and that of
others.

X. Due to high levels of spam and past incidents of posts from those
who wish to cause disruption on the list (trolls), we have a policy
of placing all new list members on Moderated Status until we are
satisfied that they are indeed here to celebrate aspects of Roma
Antiqua and Nova Roma, as opposed to being here for unjustifiable
reasons. This is unfortunate, but it has proved necessary.

XI. Language Policies: The forum of Roma Antiquita was a large venue,
with many people of different cultures and languages conversing.
Official information was in Latin, and in some cases Greek, but
people were free to speak informally in the language of their choice.
Our constitution mandates freedom of communication provided it is
not dangerous or disruptive. Currently, the Praetors can understand
Swedish and French apart from English and Latin, so messages in those
languages are welcome.

There are also a number of other languages for which translation help
can be obtained from the decuria of interpreters of Nova Roma.
Thanks to the decuria of interpreters and to several magistrates or
legates who are willing to assist with list moderation, 'informal'
communication in the forum is open to most main languages. Feel free
to post in English, Latin, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, French,
Hungarian , German, Russian and other Slavic languages, Norwegian,
Finnish, or Swedish. The Praetors have many to thank for efforts in
this regard.

However, if you do not want significant delays, please include an
English translation with your posts.

*** Exception: *** All official documents published on the list must
follow the Lex Cornelia de Linguis Publicus,
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-02-27-ii.html which
stipulates, through comitial mandate, that any official government
legislation or priestly decrees must be issued in English or Latin
where applicable, so they can be translated verbatim into other
languages to be more easily understood by the entirety of the
populace.

XII: The Praetors have the imperium to govern the list, but prefer to
encourage positive interaction as opposed to punishing negative
behavior. In the case of a poster whose actions violate the above
guidelines, the following course of escalation shall be followed:

A private memo from the Praetors' office or a Scribal designate
describing the infraction, and a reminder to review the guidelines.

A second private memo as above. Placement of the poster on moderated
status (posts are still allowed but will be reviewed by the Praetors
or their designate before being transmitted to the list). The length
of moderation shall be determined by the number of offences in the
past, the severity of the violation, and the intent to violate. No
citizen shall be kept in moderated status for more than 2 (two)
months after their last infraction against these guidelines without a
firm sentence issued by a legal court as described by the Lex
Salicia Iudiciaria:
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-11-24-iii.html

XIII: All previous forum guidelines are hereby repealed
This edict is effective immediately

Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetors

Given this the 4th day of February 2759 a v.c (2006 C.E.) at 7:15
pm Roman time

In the consulship of Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus and Pompeia Minucia
Tiberia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41630 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: Lentulus reversus
---Salvete Cornelius Lentulus et Omnes:

My sincere congratulations on your accomplishments amice. I am very
happy for you, and proud to work with you in NR.

Valete
Pompeia Minucia Strabo


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
<cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
> Cn. Lentulus quaestor & propraetor Quiritibus sal.:
>
> I have totally finished the Hungarian translation of the 7th
book of the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian. I am very happy and
proud: this work will be edited by one of the most prestigious
Hungarian publisher. In the translation teachers from the university
have participated and one or two students beyond me; the 12 books of
the Institutio Oratoria will be compiled by Professor Tamas Adamik
who is the most appreciated Hungarian scholar in the rhetorics, and
he himself translates some of the 12 books.
>
> Thank to those, who have been flurried so that I can finish this
work. It was a bit delayed, but there was no problem, Professor
Adamik had given me more time.
>
> Now I can return to my quaestorial and propraetorial (and other)
duties!
>
> Valete!
>
>
> Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
> Q U A E S T O R
> -------------------------------
> Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
> Provincial Sacerdos
> Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae Scholasticae Senior
> Sodalis Sodalitatis Latinitatis
> Latinista, Classicus Philologus
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41631 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: Path of Glory
A. Apollonius Juliae Cytheri omnibusque sal.

Ah, I understand better now. Thank you for explaining.
I'm sorry if my original reply to you sounded
dismissive or unfriendly - I just wanted to make it
clear that I (Apollonius) was not the person who wrote
the words which you were objecting to.

I didn't mean to suggest that you had made a silly
mistake - it is very easy to get confused by the Latin
greetings at the beginnings of some people's messages,
and I quite understand why you though the person
talking was "Apollonius Octavio".

Perhaps the reason my response sounded unfriendly was
that I didn't actually make any comment on the
substance of what you were saying. That wasn't because
I didn't take your comments seriously, but just
because I didn't feel that I had anything useful to
add.

You're right that you're not the only person who's
made a mistake, and I didn't mean to single you out as
an example - it's just that you happened to make a
mistake which was about me! I don't normally correct
other people's Latin or point out other mistakes.
That's why I didn't correct Nicetus. The only reason I
corrected you was because your mistake had my name in
it. :)

As for this fellow who said he was a Dacian, I can
understand why you were bothered by his claim - I
would be surprised if someone whom I had never heard
of were to appear on this list claiming to be from
Britannia. You're right, it is important for people
who write here to make it clear who they are.

Again, I'm sorry if I seemed impolite or unreasonable
- it wasn't my intention.





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41632 From: decimus_iulius_caesar Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Greetings All
My apologies for my extended abscence, but personal events have
prevented me from pursuing a more active role in Nova Roma, which I
hope to rectify this year.

Decimus Iulius Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41633 From: Tasia Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Greetings
Ave,

I'm a new member of Nova Roma. I have a lot to learn to about proper Roman etiquette (salutations etc.) so I hope that if I say something incorrect someone will point that out to me.

I live in Oregon and have not found any local Legio's to be a part of. I'm a member of the SCA and portray an early Greek/Roman persona. I fight heavy and am training my horse for equestrian events.

One of my main interests is the Roman cavalry and their training. As I mentioned, I have a lot to learn and I look forward to the opportunity to participate with the Nova Roma family.

Livia Tasia
=====<><><>=====<><><>=====
The Horse - nobility without conceit, friendship without envy, beauty without vanity, a willing servant, yet a slave to none. -- Unknown

Men on horseback have created most of the world's history. -- Unknown


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41634 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: Greetings
SALVE LIVIA TASIA !

Tasia <liviatasia@...> wrote: Ave,

I'm a new member of Nova Roma. I have a lot to learn to about proper Roman etiquette (salutations etc.) so I hope that if I say something incorrect someone will point that out to me.>>>
You are welcome. I have more than an year and I still learn. If you are interested in proper Roman etiquette, you can start from here :
http://www.novaroma.org/newcitizens/essential_latin.html


I live in Oregon and have not found any local Legio's to be a part of. I'm a member of the SCA and portray an early Greek/Roman persona. I fight heavy and am training my horse for equestrian events. >>>

I live in Dacia at thousands of miles distance from you. This is a prove about how a nice community can develop friendly conections between peoples from diferent areas of the world.
Even if my country isn't a SCA member, let me to salute you from Kingdom of Drachenwald.
About the local Legio, sure another nova roman, from your area, will introduce you.

One of my main interests is the Roman cavalry and their training. As I mentioned, I have a lot to learn and I look forward to the opportunity to participate with the Nova Roma family.>>>

Informations and debates are available in Militarium :
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SodalitasMilitarium/

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS










NOVA ROMANI !
Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support page to your websites.
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm

"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41635 From: Tasia Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: Greetings
Salve Ivl Sabinvs,

I wonder now where I read that 'Ave' was the greeting salutation - thanks for the link I will digest it thoroughly! And my thanks to the link for the Militarium!

Vale Bene,

Tasia


You are welcome. I have more than an year and I still learn. If you are interested in proper Roman etiquette, you can start from here :
http://www.novaroma.org/newcitizens/essential_latin.html


Informations and debates are available in Militarium :
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SodalitasMilitarium/

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41636 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS VEXELLUM et GEOGRAPHICUM
Edictum Propraetore Canada Orientalis Vexellum et Emblem Geographicum.

This edictum herein proclaims the official flag of the Provincia Canada Orientalis, which may be viewed at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Canada_Orientalis_NR


This edictum herein further proclaims the official emblem of Canada Orientalis Provincia, which maps the geography of the provincia. This also may be viewed at the above link.

Issued this 3 Feb. 2759 ab urb condita in the consulship of Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus et Pompeia Minucia Strabo.

This edictum officially recognizes the work of Lucius Aurelius Severus Procurator Canada Orientalis Provincia et G. Octavia Inda of Lacus Magni Provincia.


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41637 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS VEXELLUM et GEOGRAPHICUM
Salve Consul

I'm sorry, but for some reason I can not see the flag, or the geography of
the provincia, on the link you provided, is there a way I can see them?...
Are they on the Canada Orientlais website!?!... {:-\

Quintus Sertorius

----- Original Message -----
From: "Pompeia Minucia Strabo" <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
To: <NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com>;
<Canada_Orientalis_NR@yahoogroups.com>; <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 8:41 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS VEXELLUM et
GEOGRAPHICUM


> Edictum Propraetore Canada Orientalis Vexellum et Emblem Geographicum.
>
> This edictum herein proclaims the official flag of the Provincia Canada
> Orientalis, which may be viewed at
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Canada_Orientalis_NR
>
>
> This edictum herein further proclaims the official emblem of Canada
> Orientalis Provincia, which maps the geography of the provincia. This
> also may be viewed at the above link.
>
> Issued this 3 Feb. 2759 ab urb condita in the consulship of Gaius Fabius
> Buteo Modianus et Pompeia Minucia Strabo.
>
> This edictum officially recognizes the work of Lucius Aurelius Severus
> Procurator Canada Orientalis Provincia et G. Octavia Inda of Lacus Magni
> Provincia.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41638 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS VEXELLUM et GEOGRAPHICUM
---Salve Sertori et Salvete Omnes:

Did you click on the link?

Seems to be working ok for me. Anyone else?

Pompeia





In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nathan Guiboche" <nate@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Consul
>
> I'm sorry, but for some reason I can not see the flag, or the
geography of
> the provincia, on the link you provided, is there a way I can see
them?...
> Are they on the Canada Orientlais website!?!... {:-\
>
> Quintus Sertorius
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pompeia Minucia Strabo" <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
> To: <NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com>;
> <Canada_Orientalis_NR@yahoogroups.com>; <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 8:41 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS
VEXELLUM et
> GEOGRAPHICUM
>
>
> > Edictum Propraetore Canada Orientalis Vexellum et Emblem
Geographicum.
> >
> > This edictum herein proclaims the official flag of the
Provincia Canada
> > Orientalis, which may be viewed at
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Canada_Orientalis_NR
> >
> >
> > This edictum herein further proclaims the official emblem of
Canada
> > Orientalis Provincia, which maps the geography of the
provincia. This
> > also may be viewed at the above link.
> >
> > Issued this 3 Feb. 2759 ab urb condita in the consulship of
Gaius Fabius
> > Buteo Modianus et Pompeia Minucia Strabo.
> >
> > This edictum officially recognizes the work of Lucius Aurelius
Severus
> > Procurator Canada Orientalis Provincia et G. Octavia Inda of
Lacus Magni
> > Provincia.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41639 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-02-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS VEXELLUM et GEOGRAPHICUM
Salve Council
I clicked... But for some reason it did not work as I am having yahoo
troubles.... Will there be another way to view them?!?... BTW It is good
to speak to you once more!!..
Vale
QS

----- Original Message -----
From: "pompeia_minucia_tiberia" <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 10:34 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS VEXELLUM et
GEOGRAPHICUM


> ---Salve Sertori et Salvete Omnes:
>
> Did you click on the link?
>
> Seems to be working ok for me. Anyone else?
>
> Pompeia
>
>
>
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nathan Guiboche" <nate@...> wrote:
>>
>> Salve Consul
>>
>> I'm sorry, but for some reason I can not see the flag, or the
> geography of
>> the provincia, on the link you provided, is there a way I can see
> them?...
>> Are they on the Canada Orientlais website!?!... {:-\
>>
>> Quintus Sertorius
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Pompeia Minucia Strabo" <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
>> To: <NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com>;
>> <Canada_Orientalis_NR@yahoogroups.com>; <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 8:41 PM
>> Subject: [Nova-Roma] EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS
> VEXELLUM et
>> GEOGRAPHICUM
>>
>>
>> > Edictum Propraetore Canada Orientalis Vexellum et Emblem
> Geographicum.
>> >
>> > This edictum herein proclaims the official flag of the
> Provincia Canada
>> > Orientalis, which may be viewed at
>> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Canada_Orientalis_NR
>> >
>> >
>> > This edictum herein further proclaims the official emblem of
> Canada
>> > Orientalis Provincia, which maps the geography of the
> provincia. This
>> > also may be viewed at the above link.
>> >
>> > Issued this 3 Feb. 2759 ab urb condita in the consulship of
> Gaius Fabius
>> > Buteo Modianus et Pompeia Minucia Strabo.
>> >
>> > This edictum officially recognizes the work of Lucius Aurelius
> Severus
>> > Procurator Canada Orientalis Provincia et G. Octavia Inda of
> Lacus Magni
>> > Provincia.
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------
>> > Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
>> >
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41640 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS VEXELLUM et GEOGRAPHICUM
Salvete Consul Pompeia et Sertori,

The link works for me; nice flag! Quinte, too many more problems
with yahoo and we'll have to go back to the ancient ways and send
smoke signals!

Regards,

QSP




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> ---Salve Sertori et Salvete Omnes:
>
> Did you click on the link?
>
> Seems to be working ok for me. Anyone else?
>
> Pompeia
>
>
>
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nathan Guiboche" <nate@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Consul
> >
> > I'm sorry, but for some reason I can not see the flag, or the
> geography of
> > the provincia, on the link you provided, is there a way I can
see
> them?...
> > Are they on the Canada Orientlais website!?!... {:-\
> >
> > Quintus Sertorius
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Pompeia Minucia Strabo" <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@>
> > To: <NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com>;
> > <Canada_Orientalis_NR@yahoogroups.com>; <Nova-
Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 8:41 PM
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS
> VEXELLUM et
> > GEOGRAPHICUM
> >
> >
> > > Edictum Propraetore Canada Orientalis Vexellum et Emblem
> Geographicum.
> > >
> > > This edictum herein proclaims the official flag of the
> Provincia Canada
> > > Orientalis, which may be viewed at
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Canada_Orientalis_NR
> > >
> > >
> > > This edictum herein further proclaims the official emblem of
> Canada
> > > Orientalis Provincia, which maps the geography of the
> provincia. This
> > > also may be viewed at the above link.
> > >
> > > Issued this 3 Feb. 2759 ab urb condita in the consulship of
> Gaius Fabius
> > > Buteo Modianus et Pompeia Minucia Strabo.
> > >
> > > This edictum officially recognizes the work of Lucius
Aurelius
> Severus
> > > Procurator Canada Orientalis Provincia et G. Octavia Inda of
> Lacus Magni
> > > Provincia.
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------
> > > Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41641 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-02-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS VEXELLUM et GEOGRAPHICUM
Salve Quintus
Being Metis I would know how to do that!!!.. Hee Hee
Vale
QS

----- Original Message -----
From: "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 11:22 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS VEXELLUM et
GEOGRAPHICUM


> Salvete Consul Pompeia et Sertori,
>
> The link works for me; nice flag! Quinte, too many more problems
> with yahoo and we'll have to go back to the ancient ways and send
> smoke signals!
>
> Regards,
>
> QSP
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
> <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>>
>> ---Salve Sertori et Salvete Omnes:
>>
>> Did you click on the link?
>>
>> Seems to be working ok for me. Anyone else?
>>
>> Pompeia
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nathan Guiboche" <nate@> wrote:
>> >
>> > Salve Consul
>> >
>> > I'm sorry, but for some reason I can not see the flag, or the
>> geography of
>> > the provincia, on the link you provided, is there a way I can
> see
>> them?...
>> > Are they on the Canada Orientlais website!?!... {:-\
>> >
>> > Quintus Sertorius
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Pompeia Minucia Strabo" <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@>
>> > To: <NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com>;
>> > <Canada_Orientalis_NR@yahoogroups.com>; <Nova-
> Roma@yahoogroups.com>
>> > Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 8:41 PM
>> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS
>> VEXELLUM et
>> > GEOGRAPHICUM
>> >
>> >
>> > > Edictum Propraetore Canada Orientalis Vexellum et Emblem
>> Geographicum.
>> > >
>> > > This edictum herein proclaims the official flag of the
>> Provincia Canada
>> > > Orientalis, which may be viewed at
>> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Canada_Orientalis_NR
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > This edictum herein further proclaims the official emblem of
>> Canada
>> > > Orientalis Provincia, which maps the geography of the
>> provincia. This
>> > > also may be viewed at the above link.
>> > >
>> > > Issued this 3 Feb. 2759 ab urb condita in the consulship of
>> Gaius Fabius
>> > > Buteo Modianus et Pompeia Minucia Strabo.
>> > >
>> > > This edictum officially recognizes the work of Lucius
> Aurelius
>> Severus
>> > > Procurator Canada Orientalis Provincia et G. Octavia Inda of
>> Lacus Magni
>> > > Provincia.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------
>> > > Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
>> > >
>> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41642 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2006-02-05
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE VECTIGALIUM APPARITORE 2759 A.V.C.
Pompeia Minucia Strabo Consul Senatus Populesque Novae Romae S.P.D.

EDICTUM CONSULARE VECTIGALIUM APPARITORE MMDCCLIX

This edictum serves as a friendly yet official reminder of the legal obligations of apparitories, which include scribae and accensii of the ordinarii.

The Lex Vedia Assidui et Capite Censis
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/2001-05-20-i.html
states in part in "IIIc" that 'no member of the Capite Censi may run for or hold an office as one of the Ordinarii (including the apparitories), nor be appointed as Provincial Governor.........'

Although the deadline for taxes for this year is the end of April, those appointed to serve as scribae or accensi are to have assidui (taxpayer) status at the time of their appointment to service, to be officially and legally appreciated in their roles.

Therefore those currently holding positions as described above who do not have assidui status, are hereby asked to remit their taxes according to this year's rates within 4 days from now Roman time to ensure they are serving with qualifications honoured by law.

Dated IV Feb 0649 Roman time, issued officially in the consulship of G. Fabius Buteo Modianus et Pompeia Minucia Strabo.


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41643 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-02-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS VEXELLUM et GEOGRAPHICUM
Salve Consul

The graphic will only be visible to those subscribed to the list as
it is restricted. For everyone to see it you either need to set your
provincial list to an open status (not advisable) or upload the
graphic to the files section on this list.

Cn. Iulius Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> ---Salve Sertori et Salvete Omnes:
>
> Did you click on the link?
>
> Seems to be working ok for me. Anyone else?
>
> Pompeia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41644 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-02-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM PROPRAETORE CANADA ORIENTALIS VEXELLUM et GEOGRAPHICUM
---Salve Caesar....

Ahh... Seutonius Paulinus and Quintus Sertorius happen to be subbed
to our provincia list...soo, they can see it fine and you can't. I
thought if you visited our facepage of the Yahoo website it would be
visible to all, though. Apparently not.

I'll nonetheless upload the graphic to the announce list and this
forum.

Thanks for the heads up.

Pompeia



In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
<gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Consul
>
> The graphic will only be visible to those subscribed to the list
as
> it is restricted. For everyone to see it you either need to set
your
> provincial list to an open status (not advisable) or upload the
> graphic to the files section on this list.
>
> Cn. Iulius Caesar
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
> <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@> wrote:
> >
> > ---Salve Sertori et Salvete Omnes:
> >
> > Did you click on the link?
> >
> > Seems to be working ok for me. Anyone else?
> >
> > Pompeia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41645 From: Sextus Apollonius Scipio Date: 2006-02-05
Subject: MM Project - Link
Ex Officio Propraetoris



NOVA ROMA GALLIA

Terrarum dea gentiumque, Roma, Cui par est nihil et nihil secundum



Salvete Omnes,



I got a private message concerning a link to the Magna Mater Project.
Unfortunately, this message has been deleted.

Could the concerned person send it again? Thank you.



Optime Vale,



Sextus Apollonius Scipio

Propraetor Galliae

Senator





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41646 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-02-05
Subject: Re: MM Project - Link
SALVE APOLLONI SCIPIO, PROPRAETOR !

Sure, no problem. This is the link :
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm
Can you upload the new Magna Mater Project logo and link to your
provincial website, archaeological blog and post my message in your
provincial list ?

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Sextus Apollonius Scipio"
<apollonius_scipio@...> wrote:
>
> Ex Officio Propraetoris
>
>
>
> NOVA ROMA GALLIA
>
> Terrarum dea gentiumque, Roma, Cui par est nihil et nihil secundum
>
>
>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
>
>
> I got a private message concerning a link to the Magna Mater
Project.
> Unfortunately, this message has been deleted.
>
> Could the concerned person send it again? Thank you.
>
>
>
> Optime Vale,
>
>
>
> Sextus Apollonius Scipio
>
> Propraetor Galliae
>
> Senator
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41647 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-05
Subject: Non. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est Nonis Februariis; haec dies nefastus est.

"Now I wish for a thousand tongues, and that spirit
Of yours, Homer, you who celebrated Achilles,
While I sing the sacred Nones in alternating verse." - Ovid, Fasti II

"After these pretences they both prepared themselves for war, not only
arming their own forces but also calling to their assistance those of
their subjects. And when they had everything ready the two armies drew
near to each other and encamped at the distance of forty stades from
Rome, the Albans at the Cluilian Ditches, as they are called (for they
still preserve the name of the man who constructed them) and the
Romans a little farther inside, having chosen the most convenient
place for their camp. When the two armies saw each other's forces
neither inferior in numbers nor poorly armed nor to be despised in
respect of their other preparations, they lost their impetuous ardour
for the combat, which they had felt at first because of their
expectation of defeating the enemy by their very onset, and they took
thought rather of defending themselves by building their ramparts to a
greater height than of being the first to attack. At the same time the
most intelligent among them began to reflect, feeling that they were
not being governed by the best counsels, and there was a spirit of
faultfinding against those in authority. And as the time dragged on
in vain (for they were not injuring one another to any notable extent
by sudden dashes of the light-armed troops or by skirmishes of the
horse), the man who was looked upon as responsible for the war,
Cluilius, being irked at lying idle, resolved to march out with his
army and challenge the enemy to battle, and if they declined it, to
attack their entrenchments. And having made his preparations for an
engagement and all the plans necessary for an attack upon the enemy's
ramparts, in case that should prove necessary, when night came on he
went to sleep in the general's tent, attended by his usual guard; but
about daybreak he was found dead, no signs appearing on his body
either of wounds, strangling, poison, or any other violent death." -
Dionysius of Halicarnassus 3.4


"The peacock made complaint to Juno that, while the nightingale
pleased every ear with his song, he himself no sooner opened his mouth
than he became a laughingstock to all who heard him. The Goddess, to
console him, said, "But you far excel in beauty and in size. The
splendor of the emerald shines in your neck and you unfold a tail
gorgeous with painted plumage." "But for what purpose have I," said
the bird, "this dumb beauty so long as I am surpassed in song?' "The
lot of each," replied Juno, "has been assigned by the will of the
Fates--to thee, beauty; to the eagle, strength; to the nightingale,
song; to the raven, favorable, and to the crow, unfavorable auguries.
These are all contented with the endowments allotted to them." - Aesop

Although February is dedicated to Mars, it is also dedicated to Iuno
Sospita, the Savior of the State and the special protectress of women
and children. Her temple in Rome was in the Forum Holitorium, and
hercult, that of Sospita (or "Sispes") was important in Lanuvium as
well. The cave where offerings were made is in Lanuvio, which is
about 40 km from Rome. The name Lanuvio is thought to be derived from
"the goddess covered in wool (lana)": girls offered barley-cakes to
the sacred snake in her grove, and if their offerings were accepted,
their virginity was confirmed and the year's fertility assured. She
wore a goat-skin headdress and carried a spear and a shield.


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Aesop
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41648 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-05
Subject: Re: Lentulus reversus
> A. Tullia Scholastica M. Hortensiae Maiori Cn. Cornelio Lentulo quiritibus,
> sociis, peregrinisque omnibus S.P.D.
>
> M. Hortensia Maior. G. Cornelio Lentulo spd;
> Euge! many congratulations at finishing such a worthy
> endeavor Lentule, I hope this leads many cives of Pannonia to enjoy
> the Classics & study Latin, but then they would not need your
> excellent translation! [ioculus est ].
>
> ATS: Euge bis, ter, quarter! Tibi gratulor, Lentule amice mi!
>
> I for my part take this seriously and am applying myself at
> Magister Avitus' Spoken Latin course. I look forward to the day when I
> speak to you in Latin!
>
> ATS: Nunc magister noster modum cyberneticum nobiscum loquendi habet,
> quem tu quoque habes, M. Hortensia...
>
> bene valete
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
>
>
> I have totally finished the Hungarian translation of the 7th book of
> the
>>> > > Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian. I am very happy and proud: this
> work will
>>> > > be edited by one of the most prestigious Hungarian publisher.
>
>
> Re uera, eximie factum¹st!
>
> Valete,
>
> Scholastica
>>> > >
>>> > >
>
>
>
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41649 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Non. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est Nonis Februariis; haec dies nefastus est.

"After these pretences they both prepared themselves for war, not only
arming their own forces but also calling to their assistance those of
their subjects. And when they had everything ready the two armies drew
near to each other and encamped at the distance of forty stades from
Rome, the Albans at the Cluilian Ditches, as they are called (for they
still preserve the name of the man who constructed them) and the
Romans a little farther inside, having chosen the most convenient
place for their camp. When the two armies saw each other's forces
neither inferior in numbers nor poorly armed nor to be despised in
respect of their other preparations, they lost their impetuous ardour
for the combat, which they had felt at first because of their
expectation of defeating the enemy by their very onset, and they took
thought rather of defending themselves by building their ramparts to a
greater height than of being the first to attack. At the same time the
most intelligent among them began to reflect, feeling that they were
not being governed by the best counsels, and there was a spirit of
faultfinding against those in authority. And as the time dragged on
in vain (for they were not injuring one another to any notable extent
by sudden dashes of the light-armed troops or by skirmishes of the
horse), the man who was looked upon as responsible for the war,
Cluilius, being irked at lying idle, resolved to march out with his
army and challenge the enemy to battle, and if they declined it, to
attack their entrenchments. And having made his preparations for an
engagement and all the plans necessary for an attack upon the enemy's
ramparts, in case that should prove necessary, when night came on he
went to sleep in the general's tent, attended by his usual guard; but
about daybreak he was found dead, no signs appearing on his body
either of wounds, strangling, poison, or any other violent death." -
Dionysius of Halicarnassus 3.4


"This earthquake was on the Nones of February, in the consulship of
Regulus and Verginius. It caused great destruction in Campania, which
had never been safe from this danger but had never been damaged and
time and again had got off with a fright. Also, part of the town of
Herculaneum is in ruins and even the structures which are left
standing are shaky." - Suetonius, on the earthquake of A.D. 62


On this day the rex sacrorum would announce the calendar of monthly
religious observances from the steps of the Capitol.

"Be present O Queen of the Heavenly Gods, we Your chaste daughters
pray and bring forth this venerable gift, we, all the Roman women of
noble name, have woven this mantle with our own hands, embroidered it
for You with threads of gold. This veil You shall wear for now, O
Juno, until we mothers grow less fearful for our sons. But if You will
grant that we may repel these African storm clouds from our land, we
shall set upon You a flashing crown of diverse gems set in gold." -
Silius Italicus Punica 7.78-85

The month of February is dedicated to Mars, the god of war, and to
Iuno Sospita, Iuno as the Savior of the State. The Temple of Juno
Sospita was in the Forum Holitorium in Rome. She is the protectress
of confinements, became in a broader sense she who was always willing
to help, the liberator. At Lanuvium, Iuno Sospita had a temple which
was guarded by a serpent. Every year a maiden would offer cakes to the
serpent. If it accepted, this was a sign that the girl was a virgin.
Its refusal was an evil omen and a year of sterility was to be feared.

"The peacock made complaint to Juno that, while the nightingale
pleased every ear with his song, he himself no sooner opened his mouth
than he became a laughingstock to all who heard him. The Goddess, to
console him, said, "But you far excel in beauty and in size. The
splendor of the emerald shines in your neck and you unfold a tail
gorgeous with painted plumage." "But for what purpose have I," said
the bird, "this dumb beauty so long as I am surpassed in song?' "The
lot of each," replied Juno, "has been assigned by the will of the
Fates--to thee, beauty; to the eagle, strength; to the nightingale,
song; to the raven, favorable, and to the crow, unfavorable auguries.
These are all contented with the endowments allotted to them." - Aesop

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41650 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: post. Non. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est postridie Nonas Februarius; haec dies nefastus est.

"This unfortunate event appearing extraordinary to everybody, as one
would naturally expect, and the cause of it being enquired into — for
no preceding illness could be alleged — those who ascribed all human
fortunes to divine providence said that this death had been due to the
anger of the gods, because he had handled an unjust and unnecessary
war between the mother-city and her colony. But others, who looked
upon war as a profitable business and thought they had been deprived
of great gains, attributed the event to human treachery and envy,
accusing some of his fellow citizens of the opposing faction of having
made away with him by secret and untraceable poisons that they had
discovered. Still others alleged that, being overcome with grief and
despair, he had taken his own life, since all his plans were becoming
difficult and impracticable and none of the things that he had looked
forward to in the beginning when he first took hold of affairs was
succeeding according to his desire. But those who were not influenced
by either friendship or enmity for the general and based their
judgment of what had happened on the soundest grounds were of the
opinion that neither the anger of the gods nor the envy of the
opposing faction nor despair of his plans had put an end to his life,
but rather Nature's stern law and fate, when once he had finished the
destined course which is marked out for everyone that is born. Such,
then, was the end that Cluilius met, before he had performed any noble
deed. In his place Mettius Fufetius was chosen general by those in the
camp and invested with absolute power; he was a man without either
ability to conduct a war or constancy to preserve a peace, one who,
though he had been at first as zealous as any of the Albans in
creating strife between the two cities and for that reason had been
honoured with the command after the death of Cluilius, yet after he
had obtained it and perceived the many difficulties and embarrassments
with which the business was attended, no longer adhered to the same
plans, but resolved to delay and put off matters, since he observed
that not all the Albans now had the same ardour for war and also that
the victims, whenever he offered sacrifice concerning battle, were
unfavourable. And at last he even determined to invite the enemy to
an accommodation, taking the initiative himself in sending heralds,
after he had been informed of a danger from the outside which
threatened both the Albans and Romans, a danger which, if they did not
terminate their war with each other by a treaty, was unavoidable and
bound to destroy both armies." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus 3.5



"And so soon as he had cut off the members with flint and cast them
from the land into the surging sea, they were swept away over the main
a long time: and a white foam spread around them from the immortal
flesh, and in it there grew a maiden...and came forth an awful and
lovely goddess, and grass grew up about her beneath her shapely feet.
Her gods and men call Aphrodite...because she grew amid the foam." -
Hesiod, Theogony 185ff.

In ancient Greece, today was celebrated as the birth of Aphrodite,
known to the Romans as Venus. According to Hesiod (Theogony 188-198),
when Kronos had cut off his father's members, he tossed them into the
sea. The immortal flesh eventually spread into a circle of white
foam... from this foam, Aphrodite was created. Her name literally
means foam-born. She was attended by Eros and Himeros when she was
first born but when she stepped ashore on the island of Kypros she was
a "modest and lovely Goddess", since known as the Lady of Kypros. Her
gentle domain was intended to be "the sweetness of love" and "the
whispering of girls" but her adventures, and the adventures of her
children, caused as much misery and bloodshed as any of the immortals
--- except for Ares (Mars) and Athene (Athena), who thrived on warfare.

Aphrodite was born fully grown out of the foam, and as such is of an
older generation than Zeus. The Iliad (Book V) expresses another
version of her origin, by which she was considered a daughter of
Dione, who was the original oracular goddess ("Dione" being simply
"the goddess," etymologically an equivalent of "Diana") at Dodona. In
Homer, Aphrodite, venturing into battle to protect her son, Aeneas,
who has been wounded by Diomedes and returns to her mother, to sink
down at her knee and be comforted. "Dione" seems to be an equivalent
of Rhea, the Earth Mother, whom Homer has relocated to Olympus. After
this story, Aphrodite herself was sometimes referred to as "Dione".
Once Zeus had usurped the oak-grove oracle at Dodona, some poets made
him out to be the father of Aphrodite.

Aphrodite's chief center of worship remained at Paphos, on the
south-western coast of Cyprus, where the goddess of desire had long
been worshipped as Ishtar and Ashtaroth. It is said that she first
tentatively came ashore at Cytherea, a stopping place for trade and
culture between Crete and the Peloponesus. Thus perhaps we have hints
of the track of Aphrodite's original cult from the Levant to mainland
Greece. In Plato's Symposium the speech of Pausanias distinguishes
two manifestations of Aphrodite, represented by the two stories:
Aphrodite Ourania ("heavenly" Aphrodite), and Aphrodite Pandemos
("Common" Aphrodite). These two manifestations represented her role in
homosexuality and heterosexuality, respectively.

Venus was originally a vegetation goddess and patroness of gardens and
vineyards. Later, under Greek influence, she was equated with
Aphrodite and assumed many of her aspects. The oldest temple known of
Venus dates back to 293 B.C., and was inaugurated on August 18. Later,
on this date the Vinalia Rustica was observed. A second festival, that
of the Veneralia, was celebrated on April 1 in honor of Venus
Verticordia, who later became the protector against vice. Her temple
was built in 114 B.C. After the Roman defeat near Lake Trasum in 215
B.C., a temple was built on the Capitol for Venus Erycina. This temple
was officially opened on April 23, and a festival, the Vinalia Priora,
was instituted to celebrate the occasion.


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Aphrodite/Venus (Stewart, Michael.
"Aphrodite", Greek Mythology: From the Iliad to the Fall of the Last
Tyrant. http://messagenet.com/myths/bios/aphrodite.html) and
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aphrodite) and ("Venus." Encyclopedia
Mythica from Encyclopedia Mythica Online.
<http://www.pantheon.org/articles/v/venus.html>)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41651 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Re: Greetings
A. Apollonius Liviae Tasiae D. Julio Caesari omnibus
sal.

Welcome back, D. Juli!

And welcome for the first time, Tasia! (I think your
Roman name will need a little work - you'll be given
help with this as you go through the process of
applying for citizenship).

"Ave" is okay as a greeting, but "salve" is more
common. Don't worry too much about things like that at
the moment - watch what other people do and you'll
soon get the hang of it. :)



___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Photos – NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 8p a photo http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41652 From: asinivspollio Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Roman funerary music - funeral of C. Iulius Caesar
SALVETE OMNES


My first post at Nova Roma will be very specific: we are currently reconstructing the
funeral of C. Iulius Caesar. It doesn't need to be fully historically accurate, because it
will have to correspond not to the true accounts of 44 BC but to the supposed praetexta
divi Iulii as it was probably staged in 43 BC.

One of my primary tasks will be to reconstruct the funerary music of the ceremony.
We know for sure that there were praefica performing the neniae, accompanied by tibiae
player(s) (double flute). There were rattles used to announce the entrance of the
procession, the bier and the tropaeum. The historical sources (Suetonius, Appianus et al.)
speak of Caesar's lament as performed before the miseratio, probably delivered
(Suetonius: "chanted", Appianus: "told") by the archimimus or Marcus Antonius in his role
as quasi-choregos: Men servasse, ut essent qui me perdent? from "Contest for the Arms of
Achilles" by Pacuvius. The audience functioned as a choir, answering with verses from the
Atilius' Latin rendition of the Electra by Sophokles.

The nenia has already been fairly well reconstructed on the Synaulia CDs "Music from
Ancient Rome". In addition one could also extrapolate from praeficae vocals in current
folklore music in Italy (and especially Sardinia).

A very similar song to the "Men servasse [...]" has outlasted to this day in the improperia of
the Christian Good Friday liturgy: Popule meus, quid feci tibi? [...]. Since both songs are
the same in musical structure, one would only need to adjust the style.

So it all boils down to the style of the music. Appianus writes in his Civil Wars
(2.146.32 ff.; transl.: Loeb 1913): "After the discourse other lamentations were chanted
with funeral music according to the national custom, by the people in chorus, to the dead
[...]".

My questions to you are these:

1. Are there any resources on Roman funerary music in general? ("according to the
national custom")

2. Since much of Roman music has its roots in Greek musical culture, resources on Greek
funeral music, especially concerning the role of the choir, could also be of use.

3. Are there any more CDs apart from the Synaulia publication, maybe containing not only
neniae but funeral songs in general?

4. Is there secondary literature on neniae and Roman funeral music in general?

Any help will be welcome, and I would like to thank you in advance.


VALETE

C. ASINIVS POLLIO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41653 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Re: Roman funerary music - funeral of C. Iulius Caesar
Salve Asini!

Welcome to our list! Music is an interesting subject.

Here is a colorful intersting site on Roman musical instruments:

http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/w/x/wxk116/muse/

Ancient Roman Music:

http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/Venue/1452/ROMAN.HTML

And based on the assumption that the Romans used Greek music, here
is an interesting site with some ancient melodies:

http://www.oeaw.ac.at/kal/agm/index.htm


I often wondered what ancient melodies would sound like. Would some
be very pretty like "Yesterday" by the Beatles or "Greensleeves". I
know ancient music would not sound like
big Hollywood epic sound tracks like Ben Hur, Gladiator, El Cid etc
since instruments were simpler couldn't produce the depth, harmonies
etc. that came after the 18th century as Censor Marinus pointed out
on a post a while back.

Anyway, I suggest contacting Manius Constantinus Serapio or our
former Consul Astur as they are quite the experts in this
field and love to be questioned on this subject. Perhaps they'll see
your postings and give some suggestion for Caesar's funeral music.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus







--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "asinivspollio" <smaitee@...>
wrote:
>
> SALVETE OMNES
>
>
> My first post at Nova Roma will be very specific: we are currently
reconstructing the
> funeral of C. Iulius Caesar. It doesn't need to be fully
historically accurate, because it
> will have to correspond not to the true accounts of 44 BC but to
the supposed praetexta
> divi Iulii as it was probably staged in 43 BC.
>
>snipped for brevity
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41654 From: vespasian72001 Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Larariums!!!
Salvete omnes,
I am offering a unique service for all practicioners of the Religio,
and please call me on this if you feel that I am failing to go proxy
the NR governance for this...
I am willing to build any NR citizen a lararium (think temple-style
circa Pompeii) out of plaster, and will ship it FREE OF CHARGE to
you.
There are only FOUR specific requirements (and this is why I feel
I'm "allowed" to do this):

-General dimensions and outline of your specific lararium you would
like me to build (more on this if you specifically email me).
-Appearance, including painting and any sculptery you'd like me to
do.
-Verified DONATION of USD$15.00 to the "DONO DARE" on the official
NR website (verified meaing a paypal transcript of your donation to
my personal address).
-Your specific address and any special shipping instructions you'd
like me to observe.

While I will respond rather quickly to any email response, please
understand that the turn around for any products will take a while
(specific time estimates will be forthcoming to any orders placed).

If you are still interested in enhancing your personal RELIGIO
experience and practice, please contact me at:

<<agraham4@...>>

Pax Decorum,

Titus Flavius Vespasianus

QUAESTOR . LEGATE . PONTIFEX MINOR . PROVINCIAL SACERDOS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41655 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Re: Larariums!!!
C. Equitius Cato T. Flavio Vespasiano quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Flavius Vespasianus, this is an excellent offer. Two things:

First, I would like to see you offer this through the Macellum that we
have, as it is the official marketplace through which all vendors
(members of the Ordo Equester and others) bring goods and services to
citizens of the Republic. Please contact Marcus Lucretius Agricola
for details on how to be included on our vendor list.

Second, do you have any photographs (or links to photos) of work
you've already done? I'd be very interested in seeing what you have
to offer, as I'm basically turning over one entire wall of my
apartment to things Roman ...

Vale et valete bene,

Cato
Aedilis Curulis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41656 From: asinivspollio Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Re: Roman funerary music - funeral of C. Iulius Caesar
SALVE SVETONI

Thanks for the quick reply and the links. Especially the last one might be useful because of
the audio examples.

If someone is also interested in this subject, here is some stuff that I came up with on my
own:

A very good book on ancient music by John Landels. The primary focus however is on
Greek music:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0415248434/sr=1-1/qid=1139248586/
ref=sr_1_1/104-3865036-0402303?%5Fencoding=UTF8

The Synaulia CDs:

Volume 1 (Woodwinds & Brass)

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00000DMKM/qid=1139248754/sr=8-2/
ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i2_xgl/203-6545041-4285560

Volume 2 (Strings)

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00006C741/qid=1139248754/sr=8-1/
ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl/203-6545041-4285560

A unique CD with reconstructed Greek music, including the Terencio fragment (Hecyra
861):

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00004TVG7/qid=1139249003/sr=8-2/
ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i2_xgl/203-6545041-4285560

Maybe more to come later...


VALE

C. ASINIVS POLLIO


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)"
<mjk@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Asini!
>
> Welcome to our list! Music is an interesting subject.
>
> Here is a colorful intersting site on Roman musical instruments:
>
> http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/w/x/wxk116/muse/
>
> Ancient Roman Music:
>
> http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/Venue/1452/ROMAN.HTML
>
> And based on the assumption that the Romans used Greek music, here
> is an interesting site with some ancient melodies:
>
> http://www.oeaw.ac.at/kal/agm/index.htm
>
>
> I often wondered what ancient melodies would sound like. Would some
> be very pretty like "Yesterday" by the Beatles or "Greensleeves". I
> know ancient music would not sound like
> big Hollywood epic sound tracks like Ben Hur, Gladiator, El Cid etc
> since instruments were simpler couldn't produce the depth, harmonies
> etc. that came after the 18th century as Censor Marinus pointed out
> on a post a while back.
>
> Anyway, I suggest contacting Manius Constantinus Serapio or our
> former Consul Astur as they are quite the experts in this
> field and love to be questioned on this subject. Perhaps they'll see
> your postings and give some suggestion for Caesar's funeral music.
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41657 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Re: Roman funerary music - funeral of C. Iulius Caesar
SALVE ASINI POLLIO !

I don't know if I'm right to the subject, but I remember, from when I tried to find roman ancient music to the net for the Magna Mater website, an interesting adress. Maybe is useful :
http://www.ancestral.co.uk/romanmusic2003.htm

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

asinivspollio <smaitee@...> wrote:
SALVE SVETONI

Thanks for the quick reply and the links. Especially the last one might be useful because of
the audio examples.

If someone is also interested in this subject, here is some stuff that I came up with on my
own:

A very good book on ancient music by John Landels. The primary focus however is on
Greek music:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0415248434/sr=1-1/qid=1139248586/
ref=sr_1_1/104-3865036-0402303?%5Fencoding=UTF8

The Synaulia CDs:

Volume 1 (Woodwinds & Brass)

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00000DMKM/qid=1139248754/sr=8-2/
ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i2_xgl/203-6545041-4285560

Volume 2 (Strings)

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00006C741/qid=1139248754/sr=8-1/
ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl/203-6545041-4285560

A unique CD with reconstructed Greek music, including the Terencio fragment (Hecyra
861):

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00004TVG7/qid=1139249003/sr=8-2/
ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i2_xgl/203-6545041-4285560

Maybe more to come later...


VALE

C. ASINIVS POLLIO


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)"
<mjk@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Asini!
>
> Welcome to our list! Music is an interesting subject.
>
> Here is a colorful intersting site on Roman musical instruments:
>
> http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/w/x/wxk116/muse/
>
> Ancient Roman Music:
>
> http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/Venue/1452/ROMAN.HTML
>
> And based on the assumption that the Romans used Greek music, here
> is an interesting site with some ancient melodies:
>
> http://www.oeaw.ac.at/kal/agm/index.htm
>
>
> I often wondered what ancient melodies would sound like. Would some
> be very pretty like "Yesterday" by the Beatles or "Greensleeves". I
> know ancient music would not sound like
> big Hollywood epic sound tracks like Ben Hur, Gladiator, El Cid etc
> since instruments were simpler couldn't produce the depth, harmonies
> etc. that came after the 18th century as Censor Marinus pointed out
> on a post a while back.
>
> Anyway, I suggest contacting Manius Constantinus Serapio or our
> former Consul Astur as they are quite the experts in this
> field and love to be questioned on this subject. Perhaps they'll see
> your postings and give some suggestion for Caesar's funeral music.
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Suetonius Paulinus







SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------







NOVA ROMANI !
Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support page to your websites.
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm

"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------
Brings words and photos together (easily) with
PhotoMail - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41658 From: Tasia Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Re: Greetings
Salve,

How can I go about working on my name? What part is incorrect? Or is the entire part not correct? I took it from the Names section of the Nova Roma page. I read that the male names could be made feminine by adding an 'a'. So I took the names Livius and Tasius to make Livia Tasia.

Any help in this would be greatly appreciated.

Tasia

And welcome for the first time, Tasia! (I think your
Roman name will need a little work - you'll be given
help with this as you go through the process of
applying for citizenship).

"Ave" is okay as a greeting, but "salve" is more
common. Don't worry too much about things like that at
the moment - watch what other people do and you'll
soon get the hang of it. :)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41659 From: Maior Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Re: Larariums!!!
M. Hortensia T. Flavio Vespasiano quiritibusque S.P.D.
what a fastastic idea! Thank you:)!!
I for one was just about to plunge into one of those Hirst kits &
being none too handy was dreading it. If you have a photo, which I
would love to see, please make one for me. I will send you a check
asap!!
M. Hortensia Maior
aedilis plebis

> Second, do you have any photographs (or links to photos) of work
> you've already done? >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41660 From: Tita Artoria Marcella Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: Re: Greetings
Salve Tasia et salvete omnes,

>How can I go about working on my name?

The page linked below will explain the current requirements for an acceptable Roman name. Be aware, however, that the praenomen list is out of date--Titia is now Tita, and there may be other changes.

http://www.novaroma.org/via_romana/names.html

Vale et valete,
T. Artoria Marcella

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41661 From: Vestinia, called Vesta Date: 2006-02-06
Subject: The Full Vestal
Salve!

I recently came into possession of multiple weights of pure white
wool. With that in mind, I wish to make a full set of Vestal raiment.

The book sources I have are incomplete, repetitive and circular --
and have little to no photography.

Can anyone recommend a good source for an indepth
discussion/dissection of Vestal clothing?

Vale,
Vestinia

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41662 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-07
Subject: Re: The Full Vestal
> A. Tullia Scholastica Vestiniae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque omnibus
> S.P.D.
>
> Salve!
>
> I recently came into possession of multiple weights of pure white
> wool. With that in mind, I wish to make a full set of Vestal raiment.
>
> ATS: You might want to check out a book I mentioned earlier today on the
> NewRoman list, The World of Roman Costume by Judith Lynn Sebesta and Larissa
> Bonfante, the latter of whom at least is a professor at NYU specializing in
> clothing. Pages 54 and 57-60 contain material on the clothing and hairstyles
> of Vestals, some pointing to evidence that they wore the seni crines of
> brides, others that they wore their hair cropped short like slaves, but
> covered it with woolen fillets, though the latter seems to prevail. There are
> several sculptural representations of this in the following pages.
>
> As Professors Sebesta and Bonfante point out on page 54, the Vestales wore
> the tunica recta, the old-fashioned wide tunica woven on a warp-weighted loom;
> my guess is that it was either made in one piece, leaving a slit for the neck
> opening during the weaving process, then seamed up the sides, leaving an area
> for the armholes, or was wide enough that it could be wrapped around the body
> on one side (as the authors suggest), seamed across the top except for the
> neck opening, and seamed up the side up to the arm opening; that, however,
> would have forced them to cut the other arm opening since Roman clothing had
> the armholes on the side of the garment, whereas Greek clothing (except for
> children and slaves) had the armholes at the top of the garment, thus creating
> a very different effect when draped on the body. It is also possible that the
> other ancient and common Roman method was used, that of using two rectangles
> seamed across the top except for the neck opening, and up the sides except for
> the arm opening (not to be confused with actual sleeves, though the wide
> garments functioned as sleeves). In any case, the tunica of the Vestales was
> the same as that of the bride, and possibly their hairstyle was as well. They
> also wore a short veil, bordered in purple, the suffibulum, on top of the
> fillets.
>
>
> The book sources I have are incomplete, repetitive and circular --
> and have little to no photography.
>
> Can anyone recommend a good source for an indepth
> discussion/dissection of Vestal clothing?
>
> ATS: See above. There are also other good, academic works, but the ones
> I can think of offhand are auf Deutsch or en Français‹and hard to get outside
> of major university or large public libraries. This, however, seems to be the
> only one I know of which deals at length with the Vestales. If you can lay
> your hands on anything by Gisela Richter or Leon Heuzey, have a look, though
> these deal with general ancient dress. Both wrote journal articles, and you
> may be able to locate some of those, with the caveat that Heuzey, a major
> French archaeologist, floruit around 1880-1920 or so, and G.M. A. Richter is
> also deceased, though much more recently. You might also run into some art
> works by checking the collections of the major museums‹the Met in NYC and the
> big European ones for starters.
>
> However, one should be a sacerdos Vestae to don this garb...
>
> Vale,
> Vestinia
>
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
> Classicist
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41663 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-07
Subject: Re: Greetings
> A. Tullia Scholastica T. Artoriae Marcellae Tasiae quiritibus, sociis,
> peregrinisque omnibus S.P.D.
>
> Salve Tasia et salvete omnes,
>
>> >How can I go about working on my name?
>
> The page linked below will explain the current requirements for an acceptable
> Roman name. Be aware, however, that the praenomen list is out of date--Titia
> is now Tita, and there may be other changes.
>
> ATS: Livia is a perfectly fine nomen, or clan name, but a praenomen, or
> first name, is desirable. One must choose from a list of about 18 names. The
> female ones are: Aula, Appia, Gaia, Gnaea, Decima, Lucia, Marca, Mania,
> Numeria, Publia, Quinta, Seruia, Sexta, Spuria, Tita, and Tiberia. Other,
> rare ones are available by special request.
>
> A cognomen is desirable, but not required; Tasia doesn¹t seem acceptable
> to me. Tatius was the name of a Sabine king, who later ruled with Romulus,
> but we generally focus on the Res Publica, with limited excursions to the
> early principate. I don¹t find any Tasius in my references, but perhaps our
> more historically-oriented Latinists, such as Cordus, may be able to put his
> hands on something.
>
> As for the web pages, we in the censor¹s office are working on a new text
> for the citizenship application page; when it is fixed and approved, I will
> send it to the decuria interpretum for translation, and we will hope that the
> webmaster might concede to upload it, for we have been having considerable
> difficulty in accomplishing that. We are also working on a new via Romana
> page, though that will follow the citizenship application one. The lex Fabia
> passed last December will give you the guidelines you may find helpful, but it
> hasn¹t been uploaded, and must therefore be retrieved from the comitia call.
> The citizen application page, however, has drop-down menus of Roman names,
> which you may find useful.
>
>
> http://www.novaroma.org/via_romana/names.html
>
> Vale et valete,
> T. Artoria Marcella
>
Vale, et ualete,

A. Tullia Scholastica
Rogatrix
Censorial Scriba


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41664 From: Ice Hunter Date: 2006-02-07
Subject: Re: Greetings
Salve Tullia Scholastica et salvete omnes,

>A cognomen is desirable, but not required;

There seems to be conflicting information regarding the necessity of adopting a cognomen. The application suggests that a cognomen is optional, but the page which guides applicants through the process of choosing a name states that it is mandatory. When I applied for citizenship back in Sept. I sent my application in without a cognomen and was told that I had to have one.

Personally, I think the cognomen should be optional for men and the praenomen optional for women. It would be more in keeping with the naming conventions of the late Republic.

Vale et valete,
T. Artoria Marcella

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41665 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-02-07
Subject: Re: Greetings
A. Apollonius T. Artoriae omnibusque sal.

> >A cognomen is desirable, but not required;
>
> There seems to be conflicting information regarding
> the necessity of adopting a cognomen. The
> application suggests that a cognomen is optional,
> but the page which guides applicants through the
> process of choosing a name states that it is
> mandatory. When I applied for citizenship back in
> Sept. I sent my application in without a cognomen
> and was told that I had to have one.

There used to be a policy of requiring a cognomen in
all cases. This has now been relaxed, and rightly so
in my view. The problem is that the text on the
application form hasn't yet been updated. We're
working on that at this very moment. There does tend
to be a bit of a time-lag between the adoption of a
new policy and the correction of the website to
reflect the new policy.



___________________________________________________________
Win a BlackBerry device from O2 with Yahoo!. Enter now. http://www.yahoo.co.uk/blackberry
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41666 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2006-02-07
Subject: Re: Greetings
Cn. Lentulus Artoriae Marcellae sal.:

>>> Personally, I think the cognomen should be optional for men and the praenomen optional for women. It would be more in keeping with the naming conventions of the late Republic. <<<

As if this would be said by me... This is exactly my opnion too, but the law now normally requires women to have praenomen and anyone to have cognomen. Searches done by scolars of NR have demonstrated that women had more frequently praenomen than we had thougt it earlier; while we have to consider this fact, I think we shouldn't make praenomen obligatory for women.

Vale!

Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
Quaestor & Propraetor
Scriba Censoris GMHF


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41667 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-07
Subject: a.d. VII Id. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem VII Idus Februarius; haec dies nefastus est.

"The Veientes and Fidenates, who inhabited large and populous cities,
had in the reign of Romulus engaged in a war with the Romans for
command and sovereignty, and after losing many armies in the course of
the war and being punished by the loss of part of their territory,
they had been forced to become subjects of the conquerors; concerning
which I have given a precise account in the preceding Book. But
having enjoyed an uninterrupted peace during the reign of Numa
Pompilius, they had greatly increased in population, wealth and every
other form of prosperity. Elated, therefore, by these advantages, they
again aspired to freedom, assumed a bolder spirit and prepared to
yield obedience to the Romans no longer. For a time, indeed, their
intention of revolting remained undiscovered, but during the Alban war
it became manifest. For when they learned that the Romans had marched
out with all their forces to engaged the Albans, they thought that
they had now got the most favourable opportunity for their attack, and
through their most influential men they entered into a secret
conspiracy. It was arranged that all who were capable of bearing arms
should assemble in Fidenae, going secretly, a few at a time, so as to
escape as far as possible the notice of to against whom the plot was
aimed, and should remain there awaiting the moment when the armies of
the Romans and Albans should quit their camps and march out to battle,
the actual time to be indicated to them by means of signals given by
some scouts posted on the mountains; and as soon as the signals were
raised they were all to take arms and advance in haste against the
combatants (the road leading from Fidenae to the camps was not a long
one, but only a march of two or three hours at most), and appearing on
the battlefield at the time when presumably the conflict would be
over, they were to regard neither side as friends, but whether the
Romans or the Albans had won, were to slay the victors. This was the
plan of action on which the chiefs of those cities had determined.
If, therefore, the Albans, in their contempt for the Romans, had
rushed more boldly into an engagement and had resolved to stake
everything upon the issue of a single battle, nothing could have
hindered the treachery contrived against them from remaining secret
and both their armies from being destroyed. But as it was, their delay
in beginning war, contrary to all expectations, and the length of time
they employed in making their preparations were bringing their foes'
plans to nought. For some of the conspirators, either seeking to
compass their private advantage or envying their leaders and those who
had been the authors of the undertaking or fearing that others might
lay information — a thing which has often happened in conspiracies
where there are many accomplices and the execution is long delayed —
or being compelled by the will of Heaven, which could not consent that
a wicked design should meet with success, informed their enemies of
the treachery." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus 3.6



"Muses, sweet-speaking daughters of Zeus Kronides and mistresses of
song, sing next of long-winged Moon! From her immortal head a
heaven-sent glow envelops the earth and great beauty arises under its
radiance. From her golden crown the dim air is made to glitter as her
rays turn night to noon, whenever bright Selene, having bathed her
beautiful skin in the Ocean, put on her shining rainment and harnessed
her proud-necked and glittering steeds, swiftly drives them on as
their manes play with the evening, dividing the months. Her great
orbit is full and as she waxes a most brilliant light appears in the
sky. Thus to mortals she is a sign and a token." - Homer, Hymn to Selene 2

In ancient Greece, today was dedicated to the goddess Selene. She
represents the full moon phase of the lunar cycle, along with Artemis
(the crescent new moon) and Hecate (the waning moon). Like her brother
Helius, she drives a chariot through the sky each night; hers is
usually drawn by two horses. By Zeus, she is the mother of Pandia
(All-bright) and Ersa (Dew). By Endymion, she is the mother of fifty
daughters, who represent the fifty lunar months that elapse between
each Olympiad. The days of the full and new moon were set aside for
her worship. Endymion was a beautiful shepherd boy of Asia Minor, the
mortal lover of the moon goddess Selene. Each night he was kissed to
sleep by her. She begged Zeus to grant him eternal life so she might
be able to embrace him forever. Endymion was allowed to choose what
he would, and he chose to sleep for ever, remaining deathless and
ageless. Zeus granted his wish. Every night Selene visits him on Mt.
Latmus.

In Rome, Luna ("moon") had a temple on the Aventine Hill. It was built
in the 6th century B.C. but was destroyed in the Great Fire of Rome
under Nero.


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Selene (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selene)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41668 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2006-02-07
Subject: Re: Lentulus reversus
Cn. Lentulus Pompeiae Straboni consuli, Tulliae, T. Sabino, Hortensiae amicis suis SPD:

Thank you for your kind words; it makes me even happier that my efforts are estimated in my virtual home too!

Curate vos omnes uti valeatis quam optime, amici carissimi!

Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
Quaestor




---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41669 From: Tasia Date: 2006-02-07
Subject: Re: Greetings
Salve,

I should have mentioned I've been a citizen since 2003. I'm just now getting involved in the Nova Roma group as I wish to be as accurate as possible.

Last year, before the name page changed on the main Nova Roman site, Tasius was listed as a male Roman name. In the instructions it indicated female names were derived by adding an 'a' to the end of the 'father's name. This is how I arrived at Tasia.

I'll do more research on fixing everything. Such as adding a praenomen. like Quinta since in my Roman history my 'father's name is Quintus Livius Tasius (again taken from what was previously on the Roman Names page at the Nova Roma site).

My thanks to all who have given input and advice!

Vale,

Tasia

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41670 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
CONVENING OF THE SENATE – FEBRUARY 5, 2006


QVINTVS SVETONIVS PAULINUS – TRIBVNVS PLEBIS


The Senate is called to order Sunday, February 5, 2006 (2759)

Discussion commences from Sunday, February 5, 2006 (2759) until
Thursday February 9, 2006 (2759) Rome Time

Voting shall commence on Thursday, February 9 at 18:00 hours Rome
time.

Voting shall end on Monday February 13 at 18:00 hours Rome time


Item I: Approval of M. Iulius Severus as an Interpreter of Spanish
and French.

[From Iulius Severus: I am a Mexican journalist, living in Mexico
City, with 37 years of
experience in daily newspapers, television and radio. I have been
editor, editor in chief, war correspondent, special correspondent,
anchor man. Fluent in English; I also read, understand and write
French. Currently, I am the president of the Latin American Circle
for International Studies (LACIS), a non-governmental think tank
doing research and analysis about disarmament (especially nuclear
disarmament), peace and war, democracy, and human rights. I am 56
years old, divorced, with six children, none of them living with me.
I got my Masters in Social Sciences (Journalism and Communications)
in the Universidad del Valle de Atemajac (Atemajac Valley
University) in Guadalajara, Mexico, 1971.]

Item II: Approval of Publius Constantinus Placidus as an
Interpreter of Italian.
[From P. Constantinus Placidus: I am a former scriba in the
Provincia Italia section of Nova Roma, working in the Cohors
Prætoria of Marcus Iulius Perusianus. I would like to candidate
myself as Interpreter for the English language (English -> Italian /
Italian -> English).]

Item III: Approval of Aulus Horatius Severus as an Interpreter of
Portugese.

[From A. Horatius Severus: I graduated in Linguistics, I am
currently finishing my Master dissertation, and next year I will be
a doctorate student. I study at the University of Sao Paulo.]

Item III: Approval of Constitutional Amendment #1 from December
2005 Comitia Centuriata.

The Par. IV of Constitution of Nova Roma is amended as follows. The
line:

'An office becomes vacant when the magistrate resigns or dies.'
(Article IV, Preface)

is hereby replaced by:

'An office becomes vacant when the the sitting magistrate dies or
upon a legally valid resignation as defined by pursuant law''"

Item IV: Approval of Constitutional Amendment #2 from December 2005
Comitia Centuriata.

The Constitution of Nova Roma is amended as follows. The line:

"E. Tribes and Centuries

1. There shall exist thirty-five tribes, into which the censors
shall divide all of the citizens. Thirty-one of these tribes shall
be designated the Rural tribes, and shall be assigned by the censors
as directed by law passed by the comitia populi tributa. Four of
these tribes shall be designated the urban tribes, and shall be made
up of those citizens who fail to vote in the annual magisterial
elections. Should a member of an urban tribe subsequently vote in
an annual magisterial election, he or she shall be reassigned to a
rural tribe."

is hereby replaced by:

"E. Tribes and Centuries

1. There shall exist thirty-five tribes, into which the censors
shall divide all of the citizens. Thirty-one of these tribes shall
be designated the Rural tribes, and shall be assigned as directed by
law passed by the comitia populi tributa. Four of these tribes shall
be designated the urban tribes, and shall be made up of those
citizens designated as Capiti Censi as defined by applicable law."

Item V: Grant of permission to citizen Caius Curius Saturninus to
use the Nova Roma logo, and text of "The Official Nova Roma
Calendar" in a printed Roman wall calendar for 2006 and 2007.

[From Caius Curius Saturninus: Honourable Senators of Nova Roma,

I'm asking for your permission to use a small sized image (less than
2cm wide) of Nova Roma logo and text "The Official Nova Roma
Calendar" in the printed Roman wall calendar I'm preparing. The
reason for this request is that I have been asking for a permission
from Collegium Pontificium to use the data they have been preparing
for the Nova Roman religious calendar (which is not published in
printed version). I have also asked from the Aediles of this year to
submit me the information they wish to have included about their
festivals to the calendar. And I'm member of Ordo Equester
currently.

By getting the permission to use the above mentioned picture and
slogan I'm sure the sale figures of calendar would be considerably
better than without them, and this would make also more revenues for
NR through my Ordo Equester status. I also believe that this type of
Roman wall calendar could be most beneficial for citizens of Nova
Roma to learn to live according to Roman calendar as well as for
other educational purposes. I have also been planning to investigate
the possibilities to sell calendar outside Nova Roma and in this way
the calendar could help in making Nova Roma known.]

Item VI: Elysium Gathering (September 21, 2006 until September 24,
200-6), an event in Ohio, shall be officially co-sponsored by Nova
Roma. Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, the event coordinator of Elysium
Gathering, shall be the contact person between the event and Nova
Roma.
[Website for Elysium Gathering is here: http://www.three-
roads.org/elysium.html]


Respectfully,

QVINTVS SUETONIVIUS PAVLINVS

TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41671 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: a.d. VI Id. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem VI Idus Februarius; haec dies nefastus est.

"These were the reasons urged by the two generals to support the
pretensions of their respective cities to the supremacy; and the
outcome of the discussion was the adoption of the plan Tullius
proposed. For both the Albans and Romans who were present at the
conference, in their desire to put a speedy end to the war, resolved
to decide the controversy by arms. This also being agreed to, the
question arose concerning the number of the combatants, since the two
generals were not of the same mind. For Tullius desired that the
fate of the war might be decided by the smallest possible number of
combatants, the most distinguished man among the Albans fighting the
bravest of the Romans in single combat, and he cheerfully offered
himself to fight for his own country, inviting the Alban leader to
emulate him. He pointed out that for those who have assumed the
command of armies combats for sovereignty and power are glorious, not
only when they conquer brave men, but also when they are conquered by
the brave; and he enumerated all the generals and kings who had risked
their lives for their country, regarding it as a reproach to them to
have a greater share of the honours than others but a smaller share of
the dangers. The Alban, however, while approving of the proposal to
commit the fate of the cities to a few champions, would not agree to
decide it by single combat. He owned that when commanders of the
armies were seeking to establish their own power a combat between them
for the supremacy was noble and necessary, but when states themselves
were contending for the first place he thought the risk of single
combat not only hazardous but even dishonourable, whether they met
with good or ill fortune. And he proposed that three chosen men
p55from each city should fight in the presence of all the Albans and
Romans, declaring that this was the most suitable number for deciding
any matter in controversy, as containing in itself a beginning, a
middle and an end. This proposal meeting with the approval of both
Romans and Albans, the conference broke up and each side returned to
its own camp.

After this the generals assembled their respective armies and gave
them an account both of what they had said to each other and of the
terms upon which they had agreed to put an end to the war. And both
armies having with great approbation ratified the agreement entered
into by their generals, there arose a wonderful emulation among the
officers and soldiers alike, since a great many were eager to carry
off the prize of valour in the combat and expressed their emulation
not only by their words but also by their actions, so that their
leaders found great difficulty in selecting the most suitable
champions. For if anyone was renowned for his illustrious ancestry or
remarkable for his strength of body, famous for some brave dee in
action, or distinguished by some other good fortune or bold
achievement, he insisted upon being chosen first among the three
champions. This emulation, which was running to great lengths in both
armies, was checked by the Alban general, who called to mind that some
divine providence, long since foreseeing this conflict between the two
cities, had arranged that their future champions should be sprung of
no obscure families and should be brave in arms, most comely in
appearance, and distinguished from the generality of mankind by their
birth, which should be unusual and wonderful because of its
extraordinary nature. 4It seems that Sicinius, an Alban, had at one
and the same time married his twin daughters to Horatius, a Roman, and
to Curiatius, an Alban; and the two wives came with child at the same
time and each was brought to bed, at her first lying-in, of three male
children. The parents, looking upon the event as a happy omen both to
their cities and families, brought up all these children till they
arrived at manhood. And Heaven, as I said in the beginning, gave them
beauty and strength and nobility of mind, so that they were not
inferior to any of those most highly endowed by Nature. It was to
these men that Fufetius resolved to commit the combat for supremacy;
and having invited the Roman king to a conference, he addressed him as
follows..." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus 3.12-13


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41672 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: Re: Greetings
A. Apollonius Liviae Tasiae omnibusque sal.

> I should have mentioned I've been a citizen since
> 2003. I'm just now getting involved in the Nova Roma
> group as I wish to be as accurate as possible.

Ah, that explains why your name isn't as good as it
could be - standards were not as high back then,
though even then they were already improving.

> Last year, before the name page changed on the main
> Nova Roman site, Tasius was listed as a male Roman
> name. In the instructions it indicated female names
> were derived by adding an 'a' to the end of the
> 'father's name. This is how I arrived at Tasia.

Hmm... that piece of information is sort of right and
sort of wrong. At best it's misleading. I hope it's
been corrected by now.

The thing to realize is that it's not enough for each
of your names, taken on its own, to be Roman. "Livia"
is a perfectly Roman name, and so is "Tasia". The
problem is that putting two Roman names together can
make an un-Roman name. It was a common problem until a
few years ago.

A Roman name consists of (usually) three parts, a
praenomen, a nomen, and a cognomen. Each has its own
individual rules. The problem is that both your names,
it seems to me, are nomina, and a person can't have
more than one nomen. So if you want to make your name
more historical (as I encourage you to do, of course)
you will, I'm afraid, need to drop one or other of
your existing names. Probably the better one to drop
is "Tasia", since it doesn't seem to be a name which
was used at all during the republic, but both are
acceptable.

> I'll do more research on fixing everything. Such as
> adding a praenomen. like Quinta since in my Roman
> history my 'father's name is Quintus Livius Tasius
> (again taken from what was previously on the Roman
> Names page at the Nova Roma site).

You're right to say that you need a praenomen, and
you're right to say that it should probably be the
same as your father's (though with the -a rather than
the -us). But, if you'll forgive me asking a personal
question, whom do you mean by your "father"? I can't
see any record of any citizen of Nova Roma called Q.
Livius Tasius.





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41673 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
Salvete omnes,

I just want to emphasize the Convening Of The Senate is from CONSUL
AND SENATOR GAIUS FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS. I should have had his name in
the announcement to avoid any confusion as to who convened the Senate.

This is my first posting from our office so your patience is
appreciated!

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus

Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41674 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2325
L Equitius Cincinantus Augur A Apollonio salutem dicit

Salve, Corde amice mi

Please excuse me for making a personal response in what really is a public
forum.
That being said this is a public matter that I feel is deserving of public
defense.

In the matter if naming policy it is true that many names that were taken
from the founding of Nova Roma were completely erroneous and that "standards
were not as high back then"; however, I feel that leaves the impression that
former magistrates weren't doing their jobs. That is simply not the case.
Firstly, realize that Censores were then and are not now given authority to
propose leges, and also those who have that power most often haven't served
as Censor. Nova Roma was and

So, having served as Censor under those conditions I can say that there were
*many* instances when I would have wanted to *mandate* name policies, but I
just didn't have *law* on my side.
An examination of forum archives will reveal many instances of acrid
discussions of naming policy.
That being said, I did spend considerable time and resources on name
choices, but at that time I couldn't refuse an application because the name
wasn't perfect. Believe me, I was often very frustrated by the situation I
labored under.

Too, Nova Roma was in a time of very rapid expansion and we taxes were still
being discussed. I often had between 4 and 8 and sometimes up to 20
applications in a day. Many applications being simply absurd, and personally
not even worthy of consideration.

Pax vobiscum
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 6
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 13:40:47 +0000 (GMT)
From: "A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...>
Subject: Re: Greetings

A. Apollonius Liviae Tasiae omnibusque sal.

> I should have mentioned I've been a citizen since
> 2003. I'm just now getting involved in the Nova Roma
> group as I wish to be as accurate as possible.

Ah, that explains why your name isn't as good as it
could be - standards were not as high back then,
though even then they were already improving.

> Last year, before the name page changed on the main
> Nova Roman site, Tasius was listed as a male Roman
> name. In the instructions it indicated female names
> were derived by adding an 'a' to the end of the
> 'father's name. This is how I arrived at Tasia.

Hmm... that piece of information is sort of right and
sort of wrong. At best it's misleading. I hope it's
been corrected by now.

The thing to realize is that it's not enough for each
of your names, taken on its own, to be Roman. "Livia"
is a perfectly Roman name, and so is "Tasia". The
problem is that putting two Roman names together can
make an un-Roman name. It was a common problem until a
few years ago.

A Roman name consists of (usually) three parts, a
praenomen, a nomen, and a cognomen. Each has its own
individual rules. The problem is that both your names,
it seems to me, are nomina, and a person can't have
more than one nomen. So if you want to make your name
more historical (as I encourage you to do, of course)
you will, I'm afraid, need to drop one or other of
your existing names. Probably the better one to drop
is "Tasia", since it doesn't seem to be a name which
was used at all during the republic, but both are
acceptable.

> I'll do more research on fixing everything. Such as
> adding a praenomen. like Quinta since in my Roman
> history my 'father's name is Quintus Livius Tasius
> (again taken from what was previously on the Roman
> Names page at the Nova Roma site).

You're right to say that you need a praenomen, and
you're right to say that it should probably be the
same as your father's (though with the -a rather than
the -us). But, if you'll forgive me asking a personal
question, whom do you mean by your "father"? I can't
see any record of any citizen of Nova Roma called Q.
Livius Tasius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41675 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
> Salue, Q. Suetoni Pauline, et saluete, omnes!
>
> Firstly, let me thank you for posting this. It is very important for the
> quirites to know what goes on in the Senate, especially since agenda items can
> get mislaid. Two of the interpreterships below were supposed to be discussed
> at the last meeting of the Senate, but somehow didn¹t make it to the agenda.
>
> There may also be missing items this time as well‹this is the time when
> the governorship terms expire, and presumably that at which the incumbents
> should be prorogued or new candidates considered. In addition, the
> resignation of the present interpreter of Italian should be formally accepted
> as she is unable to continue.
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
> Interpres Linguae Latinae
> Caput Decuriae Interpretum
>
> CONVENING OF THE SENATE – FEBRUARY 5, 2006
>
>
> QVINTVS SVETONIVS PAULINUS – TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
>
>
> The Senate is called to order Sunday, February 5, 2006 (2759)
>
> Discussion commences from Sunday, February 5, 2006 (2759) until
> Thursday February 9, 2006 (2759) Rome Time
>
> Voting shall commence on Thursday, February 9 at 18:00 hours Rome
> time.
>
> Voting shall end on Monday February 13 at 18:00 hours Rome time
>
>
> Item I: Approval of M. Iulius Severus as an Interpreter of Spanish
> and French.
>
> [From Iulius Severus: I am a Mexican journalist, living in Mexico
> City, with 37 years of
> experience in daily newspapers, television and radio. I have been
> editor, editor in chief, war correspondent, special correspondent,
> anchor man. Fluent in English; I also read, understand and write
> French. Currently, I am the president of the Latin American Circle
> for International Studies (LACIS), a non-governmental think tank
> doing research and analysis about disarmament (especially nuclear
> disarmament), peace and war, democracy, and human rights. I am 56
> years old, divorced, with six children, none of them living with me.
> I got my Masters in Social Sciences (Journalism and Communications)
> in the Universidad del Valle de Atemajac (Atemajac Valley
> University) in Guadalajara, Mexico, 1971.]
>
> Item II: Approval of Publius Constantinus Placidus as an
> Interpreter of Italian.
> [From P. Constantinus Placidus: I am a former scriba in the
> Provincia Italia section of Nova Roma, working in the Cohors
> Prætoria of Marcus Iulius Perusianus. I would like to candidate
> myself as Interpreter for the English language (English -> Italian /
> Italian -> English).]
>
> Item III: Approval of Aulus Horatius Severus as an Interpreter of
> Portugese.
>
> [From A. Horatius Severus: I graduated in Linguistics, I am
> currently finishing my Master dissertation, and next year I will be
> a doctorate student. I study at the University of Sao Paulo.]
>
> Item III: Approval of Constitutional Amendment #1 from December
> 2005 Comitia Centuriata.
>
> The Par. IV of Constitution of Nova Roma is amended as follows. The
> line:
>
> 'An office becomes vacant when the magistrate resigns or dies.'
> (Article IV, Preface)
>
> is hereby replaced by:
>
> 'An office becomes vacant when the the sitting magistrate dies or
> upon a legally valid resignation as defined by pursuant law''"
>
> Item IV: Approval of Constitutional Amendment #2 from December 2005
> Comitia Centuriata.
>
> The Constitution of Nova Roma is amended as follows. The line:
>
> "E. Tribes and Centuries
>
> 1. There shall exist thirty-five tribes, into which the censors
> shall divide all of the citizens. Thirty-one of these tribes shall
> be designated the Rural tribes, and shall be assigned by the censors
> as directed by law passed by the comitia populi tributa. Four of
> these tribes shall be designated the urban tribes, and shall be made
> up of those citizens who fail to vote in the annual magisterial
> elections. Should a member of an urban tribe subsequently vote in
> an annual magisterial election, he or she shall be reassigned to a
> rural tribe."
>
> is hereby replaced by:
>
> "E. Tribes and Centuries
>
> 1. There shall exist thirty-five tribes, into which the censors
> shall divide all of the citizens. Thirty-one of these tribes shall
> be designated the Rural tribes, and shall be assigned as directed by
> law passed by the comitia populi tributa. Four of these tribes shall
> be designated the urban tribes, and shall be made up of those
> citizens designated as Capiti Censi as defined by applicable law."
>
> Item V: Grant of permission to citizen Caius Curius Saturninus to
> use the Nova Roma logo, and text of "The Official Nova Roma
> Calendar" in a printed Roman wall calendar for 2006 and 2007.
>
> [From Caius Curius Saturninus: Honourable Senators of Nova Roma,
>
> I'm asking for your permission to use a small sized image (less than
> 2cm wide) of Nova Roma logo and text "The Official Nova Roma
> Calendar" in the printed Roman wall calendar I'm preparing. The
> reason for this request is that I have been asking for a permission
> from Collegium Pontificium to use the data they have been preparing
> for the Nova Roman religious calendar (which is not published in
> printed version). I have also asked from the Aediles of this year to
> submit me the information they wish to have included about their
> festivals to the calendar. And I'm member of Ordo Equester
> currently.
>
> By getting the permission to use the above mentioned picture and
> slogan I'm sure the sale figures of calendar would be considerably
> better than without them, and this would make also more revenues for
> NR through my Ordo Equester status. I also believe that this type of
> Roman wall calendar could be most beneficial for citizens of Nova
> Roma to learn to live according to Roman calendar as well as for
> other educational purposes. I have also been planning to investigate
> the possibilities to sell calendar outside Nova Roma and in this way
> the calendar could help in making Nova Roma known.]
>
> Item VI: Elysium Gathering (September 21, 2006 until September 24,
> 200-6), an event in Ohio, shall be officially co-sponsored by Nova
> Roma. Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, the event coordinator of Elysium
> Gathering, shall be the contact person between the event and Nova
> Roma.
> [Website for Elysium Gathering is here: http://www.three-
> roads.org/elysium.html]
>
>
> Respectfully,
>
> QVINTVS SUETONIVIUS PAVLINVS
>
> TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41676 From: James Mathews Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: Name Change Rquest
Comitia Curiata Colleagues, and Citizens of NR;

This message is to indicate that I have no objection whatsoever to the Honored Consul changing his name to:

Numerius Fabius Buteo Modianus.

Respectfully;

Marcus Minucius Audens



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41677 From: Gaïus Minius Gallus Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: Roman Laws in French
De : Gaïus Minius Gallus

A : S.P.Q.R.



Salvete omnes !



For those ones who understand French and Latin and have a special
interest in the Roman Law, I do recommend to have a look on the
following internet gate :



http://vinitor.egss.ulg.ac.be/index.html
<http://vinitor.egss.ulg.ac.be/index.html>



It includes, texts, syllabus, biographies, glossaries in french and many
other very interestings items.







Vale valeque,



G. Min. Gallus





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41678 From: Tasia Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: Re: Greetings
Salve,

For persona development in the SCA a whole family is created including father what his profession was etc. So from the names database (at the time) I picked a name from each of the different lists.

So, it sounds like a Roman name has to be something that was documented in history?

Thank you for all your advice and insight!

Tasia


>You're right to say that you need a praenomen, and
you're right to say that it should probably be the
same as your father's (though with the -a rather than
the -us). But, if you'll forgive me asking a personal
question, whom do you mean by your "father"? I can't
see any record of any citizen of Nova Roma called Q.
Livius Tasius.





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com



SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
Fall of the roman empire The roman empire




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41679 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2006-02-08
Subject: Re: Greetings
Salve,

I wouldn't think we are the SCA, and making up family members doesn't sit
well with me.

Vale,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tasia" <liviatasia@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 10:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Greetings


> Salve,
>
> For persona development in the SCA a whole family is created including
> father what his profession was etc. So from the names database (at the
> time) I picked a name from each of the different lists.
>
> So, it sounds like a Roman name has to be something that was documented in
> history?
>
> Thank you for all your advice and insight!
>
> Tasia
>
>
>>You're right to say that you need a praenomen, and
> you're right to say that it should probably be the
> same as your father's (though with the -a rather than
> the -us). But, if you'll forgive me asking a personal
> question, whom do you mean by your "father"? I can't
> see any record of any citizen of Nova Roma called Q.
> Livius Tasius.
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with
> voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
> Fall of the roman empire The roman empire
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41680 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2325
> A. Tullia Scholastica L. Equitio Cincinnato Auguri quiritibus, sociis,
> peregrinisque omnibus S.P.D.
>
> L Equitius Cincinantus Augur A Apollonio salutem dicit
>
> Salve, Corde amice mi
>
> Please excuse me for making a personal response in what really is a public
> forum.
> That being said this is a public matter that I feel is deserving of public
> defense.
>
> In the matter if naming policy it is true that many names that were taken
> from the founding of Nova Roma were completely erroneous and that "standards
> were not as high back then"; however, I feel that leaves the impression that
> former magistrates weren't doing their jobs. That is simply not the case.
> Firstly, realize that Censores were then and are not now given authority to
> propose leges, and also those who have that power most often haven't served
> as Censor.
>
> ATS: Good to see you back and posting, Pontifex. You are, of course,
> completely correct: it hasn¹t always been the censores¹ fault that some of
> the stranger names had to be accepted; as you say below, they had to have the
> legal framework on which to base their decisions. We are getting some backed
> up applications from former minors, etc., which have absolutely incredible
> names‹but if they¹re still interested, they won¹t get those names, no sirree,
> Bob.
>
> Nova Roma was and
>
> ATS: ???? Is something missing here?
>
> So, having served as Censor under those conditions I can say that there were
> *many* instances when I would have wanted to *mandate* name policies, but I
> just didn't have *law* on my side.
>
> ATS: Indeed.
>
> An examination of forum archives will reveal many instances of acrid
> discussions of naming policy.
> That being said, I did spend considerable time and resources on name
> choices, but at that time I couldn't refuse an application because the name
> wasn't perfect. Believe me, I was often very frustrated by the situation I
> labored under.
>
> Too, Nova Roma was in a time of very rapid expansion and we taxes were still
> being discussed. I often had between 4 and 8 and sometimes up to 20
> applications in a day. Many applications being simply absurd, and personally
> not even worthy of consideration.
>
> ATS: We have had as many as 20 applications, or even a bit more, at times
> since I became scriba. We now have a system in which we Latinists vet the
> names first, then pass them on to a scriba for processing‹much more accurate
> and efficient. We also have a series of drop-down menus of names on the
> citizenship application page which limit the choices to genuine Roman names,
> not any fanciful nonsense with ­us on the end, though even those aren¹t
> perfect yet. We are in the process of rewriting the text for the citizenship
> application page, and for the the Roman names page; when we get done with
> that, things should be less confusing‹assuming that they get uploaded quickly.
> The citizenship application test also cuts down on the number of frivolous
> applications‹and sometimes our vetting deters those who are less than serious
> about joining us as well.
>
> Pax vobiscum
>
> Et cum spiritu tuo, et spiritibus uestris.
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
> Rogatrix
> Censorial Scriba
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 13:40:47 +0000 (GMT)
> From: "A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...>
> Subject: Re: Greetings
>
> A. Apollonius Liviae Tasiae omnibusque sal.
>
>> > I should have mentioned I've been a citizen since
>> > 2003. I'm just now getting involved in the Nova Roma
>> > group as I wish to be as accurate as possible.
>
> Ah, that explains why your name isn't as good as it
> could be - standards were not as high back then,
> though even then they were already improving.
>
>> > Last year, before the name page changed on the main
>> > Nova Roman site, Tasius was listed as a male Roman
>> > name. In the instructions it indicated female names
>> > were derived by adding an 'a' to the end of the
>> > 'father's name. This is how I arrived at Tasia.
>
> Hmm... that piece of information is sort of right and
> sort of wrong. At best it's misleading. I hope it's
> been corrected by now.
>
> The thing to realize is that it's not enough for each
> of your names, taken on its own, to be Roman. "Livia"
> is a perfectly Roman name, and so is "Tasia". The
> problem is that putting two Roman names together can
> make an un-Roman name. It was a common problem until a
> few years ago.
>
> A Roman name consists of (usually) three parts, a
> praenomen, a nomen, and a cognomen. Each has its own
> individual rules. The problem is that both your names,
> it seems to me, are nomina, and a person can't have
> more than one nomen. So if you want to make your name
> more historical (as I encourage you to do, of course)
> you will, I'm afraid, need to drop one or other of
> your existing names. Probably the better one to drop
> is "Tasia", since it doesn't seem to be a name which
> was used at all during the republic, but both are
> acceptable.
>
>> > I'll do more research on fixing everything. Such as
>> > adding a praenomen. like Quinta since in my Roman
>> > history my 'father's name is Quintus Livius Tasius
>> > (again taken from what was previously on the Roman
>> > Names page at the Nova Roma site).
>
> You're right to say that you need a praenomen, and
> you're right to say that it should probably be the
> same as your father's (though with the -a rather than
> the -us). But, if you'll forgive me asking a personal
> question, whom do you mean by your "father"? I can't
> see any record of any citizen of Nova Roma called Q.
> Livius Tasius.
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41681 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Greetings
A. Tullia Scholastica Liuiae Tasiae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
omnibus S.P.D.

This didn't arrive in my mailbox, so I forwarded it from the website. I
did receive the moderation notice...

> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tasia" <liviatasia@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> For persona development in the SCA a whole family is created including father
> what his profession was etc. So from the names database (at the time) I picked
> a name from each of the different lists.

This makes sense in the context of the SCA, but here the families are
constituted by biology or adoption. Please see the Lex Equitia Familiaris
for details, with the caveat that this is NOT easy reading. (your eyes may
glaze over...sleepy...sleepy...oh, so sleepy...)
>
> So, it sounds like a Roman name has to be something that was documented in
> history?

No, as a matter of fact, it doesn't--not all of the Roman name, anyway.
The praenomina, or first names, are common. Mostly the gentes, or 'middle'
names, clan names, are historical as well, but some in NR in the past
haven't been; one at least is a Latinization of the name Murray (Moravia),
and another is an attempt at Latinizing the name of an actress. Moravia is
legitimate, if late, Latin, but Hepburnia doesn't qualify. There are
several edicta and two laws, the Lex Cornelia et Maria de Mutandis
Nominibus, and the recently-passed (but not uploaded) Lex Fabia, which cover
this subject as well. The cognomen, or surname, which is the most
distinctive portion of the name, allows a lot more latitude--in some cases,
we permit modern occupational names, even in modern Latin, and medieval (or
later) LIMITED geographical names--we won't allow a Spaniard living in Spain
to be called Hispanus, but one in Hungary might be granted that name; we
prefer to use the names of smaller geographic areas in these cases. We use
attested cognomina, and ones no Roman would have recognized--but only in
limited circumstances; one must actually perform the occupation denoted by
occupational cognomina, for example.
>
> Thank you for all your advice and insight!

Hope this helps. Just ask us at the censor's office--we're the ones
with the answers on these matters.
>
> Tasia
>
Vale, et ualete,

A. Tullia Scholastica
Rogatrix
Censorial scriba



>> You're right to say that you need a praenomen, and
> you're right to say that it should probably be the
> same as your father's (though with the -a rather than
> the -us). But, if you'll forgive me asking a personal
> question, whom do you mean by your "father"? I can't
> see any record of any citizen of Nova Roma called Q.
> Livius Tasius.
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41682 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Greetings
> Salue, Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia, et saluete, omnes.
>
> Salve,
>
> I wouldn't think we are the SCA, and making up family members doesn't sit
> well with me.
>
> ATS: No, we aren¹t the SCA, but some of our citizens are, or have been, SCA
> members. I believe that this is the case with Liuia Tasia, who is honestly
> trying to understand Roman nomenclature, and to improve her own. I consider
> that a laudable aim.
>
> As for making up family members, what was the ahistoric gens system we had
> all about? The present one is historic, and accurate, but that certainly
> wasn¹t.
>
> Making up names isn¹t a good idea, either: Sempronia is a nomen, not a
> cognomen, Audens is a cognomen, and Annia is at best a nomen, not a praenomen.
> You might want to follow Liuia Tasia¹s fine lead, and select a more accurate
> name, especially since the hyphenated gens-name is no longer necessary.
>
> Vale,
>
> Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tasia" <liviatasia@...>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 10:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Greetings
>
>
>> > Salve,
>> >
>> > For persona development in the SCA a whole family is created including
>> > father what his profession was etc. So from the names database (at the
>> > time) I picked a name from each of the different lists.
>> >
>> > So, it sounds like a Roman name has to be something that was documented in
>> > history?
>> >
>> > Thank you for all your advice and insight!
>> >
>> > Tasia
>> >
>> >
>>> >>You're right to say that you need a praenomen, and
>> > you're right to say that it should probably be the
>> > same as your father's (though with the -a rather than
>> > the -us). But, if you'll forgive me asking a personal
>> > question, whom do you mean by your "father"? I can't
>> > see any record of any citizen of Nova Roma called Q.
>> > Livius Tasius.
>> >
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41683 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Fwd: Edictum Consulare Gubernatorial Prorogation/Applications for
---Salvete Omnes:

I am reposting this edictum below. The deadline for existing
governors to respond or new gubernatorial applications to be
submitted as per the text below is Feb. 15,2759.


Valete
Pompeia Minucia Strabo
Consul


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Pompeia Minucia Strabo
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:

Pompeia Minucia Strabo Consul Quiritibus S.P.D.

Those governors wishing to be considered for prorogation by the
Senate for another year are asked to write the Consuls at
Consuls@... so we can ensure that you are on the list for such
consideration.

Please be assured that the Feb. 1 deadline was not realistic for
this year for a few reasons, and Governors may write in with their
intentions until Feb. 15 2006 ce

Further, those who wish to apply for a position as Governor may
write to the above address stating their intentions:

Prevailing legislation states that a Propraetor _must_ have
assidui status (taypayer status).
Also... see http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2000-06-02-
1.html Senatus Consultum on desired qualifications for a Governor.
Please note that the Senate's ruling is not achieved 'strictly' by
these criteria in the above Senatus Consultum, in their selection
processes regarding governors.

Issued officially on this day kalends February MMDCCLIX A.V.C. in
the Consulship of G. Fabius Buteo Modianus and Pompeia Minucia Strabo

valete........


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

--- End forwarded message ---
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41684 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: a.d. V Id. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem V Idus Februarius; haec dies nefastus est.

"[Fufetius speaks] 'Tullius, some god who keeps watch over both our
cities would seem, just as upon many other occasions, so especially in
what relates to this combat to have made his goodwill manifest. For
that the champions who are to fight on behalf of all their people
should be found inferior to none in birth, brave in arms, most comely
in appearance, and that they should furthermore have been born of one
father and mother, and, most wonderful of all, that they should have
come p59into the world on the same day, the Horatii with you and the
Curiatii with us, all this, I say, has every appearance of a
remarkable instance of divine favour. Why, therefore, do we not
accept this great providence of the god and each of us invite the
triplets on his side to engage in the combat for the supremacy? For
not only all the other advantages which we could desire in the
best-qualified champions are to be found in these men, but, as they
are brothers, they will be more unwilling than any others among either
the Romans or the Albans to forsake their companions when in distress;
and furthermore, the emulation of the other youths, which cannot
easily be appeased in any other way, will be promptly settled. For I
surmise that among you also, as well as among the Albans, there is a
kind of strife among many of those who lay claim to bravery; but if we
inform them that some providential fortune has anticipated all human
efforts and has itself furnished us with champions qualified to engage
upon equal terms in the cause of the cities, we shall easily persuade
them to desist. For they will then look upon themselves as inferior to
the triplets, not in point of bravery, but only in respect of a
special boon of Nature and of the favour of a Chance that is equally
inclined toward both sides.'" - Dionysius of Halicarnassus 3.14


"I will remember and not be unmindful of Apollo who shoots afar. As he
goes through the house of Zeus, the gods tremble before him and all
spring up from their seats when he draws near, as he bends his bright
bow. But Leto alone stays by the side of Zeus who delights in thunder;
and then she unstrings his bow, and closes his quiver, and takes his
archery from his strong shoulders in her hands and hangs them on a
golden peg against a pillar of his father's house. Then she leads him
to a seat and makes him sit: and the Father gives him nectar in a
golden cup welcoming his dear son, while the other gods make him sit
down there, and queenly Leto rejoices because she bare a mighty son
and an archer. Rejoice, blessed Leto, for you bare glorious children,
the lord Apollo and Artemis who delights in arrows; her in Ortygia,
and him in rocky Delos, as you rested against the great mass of the
Cynthian hill hard by a palm-tree by the streams of Inopus." - Homer,
Hymn to the Delian Apollo

In ancient Greece, today was dedicated to Apollo. The son of Zeus and
Leto, and the twin brother of Artemis. Apollo was the god of music
(principally the lyre, and he directed the choir of the Muses) and
also of prophecy, colonization, medicine, archery (but not for war or
hunting), poetry, dance, intellectual inquiry and the carer of herds
and flocks. He was also a god of light, known as "Phoebus" (radiant or
beaming, and he was sometimes identified with Helios the sun god). He
was also the god of plague and was worshiped as Smintheus (from
sminthos, rat) and as Parnopius (from parnops, grasshopper) and was
known as the destroyer of rats and locust, and according to Homer's
Iliad, Apollo shot arrows of plague into the Greek camp. Apollo being
the god of religious healing would give those guilty of murder and
other immoral deeds a ritual purification. Sacred to Apollo are the
swan (one legend says that Apollo flew on the back of a swan to the
land of the Hyperboreans, he would spend the winter months among
them), the wolf and the dolphin. His attributes are the bow and
arrows, on his head a laurel crown, and the cithara (or lyre) and
plectrum. But his most famous attribute is the tripod, the symbol of
his prophetic powers.

When the goddesss Hera, the wife of Zeus (it was he who had coupled
with Leto) found out about Leto's pregnancy, she was outraged with
jealousy. Seeking revenge Hera forced Leto to roam the earth in search
of a place to give birth. Sicne Hera had forbidden Leto to stay
anywhere on earth, either on terra-ferma or an island at sea, the only
place to seek shelter was Delos, being in the center of the Aegean,
and also difficult to reach, as there were strong under-currents,
because it was said to be a floating island. Because it was a floating
island, it was not considered either of Hera's prohibitions, and so
Leto was able to give birth to the divine twins Apollo and Artemis
(before Leto gave birth to Apollo, the island was encircled by a flock
of swans, this is why the swan was sacred to him). As a gesture of
thanks Delos was secured to the sea-bed by four columns to give it
stability, and from then on it became one of the most important
sanctuaries to Apollo. (A variation of Apollo's birth was that the
jealous Hera had incarcerated Ilithyia, the goddess of childbirth, but
the other gods intervened forcing Hera to release Ilithyia, which
allowed Leto to give birth).

"I sprang upon the ship in the form of a dolphin, pray to me as Apollo
Delphinius; also the altar itself shall be called Delphinius ..." -
Homer, Hymn to the Pythian Apollo 493

Apollo's first achievement was to rid Pytho (Delphi) of the serpent
(or dragon) Python. This monstrous beast protected the sanctuary of
Pytho from its lair beside the Castalian Spring. There it stood guard
while the "Sibyl" gave out her prophecies as she inhaled the trance
inducing vapors from an open chasm. Apollo killed Python with his bow
and arrows (Homer wrote "he killed the fearsome dragon Python,
piercing it with his darts"). Apollo not only took charge of the
oracle but rid the neighboring countryside of widespread destruction,
as Python had destroyed crops, sacked villages and polluted streams
and springs. However, to make amends for killing Python, as the
fearsome beast was the son of Gaia, Apollo had to serve king Admetus
for nine years (in some versions eight) as a cowherd. This he did, and
when he returned to Pytho he came in the guise of a dolphin bringing
with him priests from Crete (Apollo's cult title "Delphinios" meaning
dolphin or porpoise, is probably how Delphi was so named). After
killing Python and taking possession of the oracle, the god of light
(Phobus) became known as "Pythian Apollo". He dedicated a bronze
tripod to the sanctuary and bestowed divine powers on one of the
priestesses, and she became known as the "Pythia". It was she who
inhaled the hallucinating vapors from the fissure in the temple floor,
while she sat on a tripod chewing laurel leaves. After she mumbled her
answer, a male priest would translate it for the supplicant. Delphi
became the most important oracle center of Apollo, there were several
including Clarus and Branchidae.

Apollo, as with Zeus his father, had many love affairs with goddesses
and mortals. Apollo's infatuation for the nymph Daphne, which had been
invoked by the young god of love Eros, because Apollo had mocked him,
saying his archery skills were pathetic, and Apollo's singing had also
irritated him. Daphne was the beautiful daughter of the river god
Ladon, and she was constantly pursued by Apollo. To escape from
Apollo's insistent behavior, she fled to the mountains, but the
persistent Apollo followed her. Annoyed by this, she asked the river
god Peneus for help, which he did. As soon as Apollo approached
Daphne, he tried to embrace her, but when he stretched out his arms
she transformed into a laurel tree. Apollo, distraught by what had
happened, made the laurel his sacred tree. Apollo also loved Cyrene,
she was another nymph, and she bore Apollo a son: Aristaeus, a
demi-god, who became a protector of cattle and fruit trees, and a
deity of hunting, husbandry and bee-keeping. He taught men dairy
skills and the use of nets and traps in hunting.

The most famous mortal loves of Apollo was Hecuba, she was the wife of
Priam, the king of Troy. She bore him Troilius. Foretold by an oracle,
as long as Troilius reached the age of twenty, Troy could not be
defeated. But the hero Achilles ambushed and killed him, when the
young prince and his sister Polyxena secretly visited a spring. Apollo
also fell in love with Cassandra, the sister of Troilius, and daughter
of Hecuba and Priam. He seduced Cassandra on the promise that he would
teach her the art of prophecy, but having learnt the prophetic art she
rejected him. Apollo, being angry of her rejection punished her, by
declaring her prophecies never to be accepted or believed.

Asclepius, the god of healing, was also Apollo's offspring, after his
union with Coronis, who was daughter of Phlegyas, king of the Lapiths.
While she was pregnant by Apollo, Coronis fell in love with Ischys,
son of Elatus, but a crow informed Apollo of the affair. Apollo sent
his twin sister Artemis to kill Coronis, and Artemis carried out he
brothers wishes. While her body was burning on the funeral pyre,
Apollo removed the unborn child, and took him to Chiron, who raised
the child Asclepius.

Apollo also, as did his father Zeus, fall in love with one of his own
gender, Hyacinthus, a Spartan prince. He was very handsome and
athletic, which inflamed the passions of Apollo. One day while Apollo
and Hyacinthus were practicing throwing the discus, Zephyrus, the god
of the west wind, who was also attracted to the young prince, and
jealous of Apollo's amorous affection towards the boy, made the discus
veer off course by blowing an ill wind. The discus, which Apollo had
thrown, hit Hyacinthus, smashing his skull. Apollo rushed to him, but
he was dead. The god was overcome with grief, but to immortalize the
love he had for the beautiful youth, he had a flower grow were his
blood had stained the earth. Apollo also loved the young boy
Cyparissus, a descendant of Heracles. The impassioned Apollo gave
Cyparissus a sacred deer, as a love token. The young deer became tame,
and was the constant companion of the boy, until a tragic accident
occurred. As the young deer lay sleeping in the shade of the
undergrowth, Cyparissus threw his javelin, which by chance hit, and
killed the deer. Grief-stricken by what had happened, Cyparissus
wanted to die. He asked Apollo to let his tears fall for all eternity.
With apprehension Apollo transformed the boy into a tree, the cypress,
which became the symbol of sorrow, as the sap on its trunk forms
droplets, like tears.

Apollo could also be ruthless when he was angered. The mortal Niobe,
boasted to Apollo's mother Leto, that she had fourteen children (in
some versions six or seven), which must make her more superior than
Leto, who had only bore two. Apollo greatly angered by this slew her
sons, and Artemis killed Niobe's daughters. Niobe wept so much that
she turned into a pillar of stone. Apollo was infuriated when the
satyr Marsyas challenged Apollo to music contest. After winning the
competition, Apollo had Marsyas flayed alive, for being so
presumptuous, as to challenge a god.

Apollo was worshiped throughout the Greek world, and at Delphi every
four years they held the Pythian Games in his honor. He had many
epithets, including "Pythian Apollo" (his name at Delphi), "Apollo
Apotropaeus" (Apollo who averts evil), and "Apollo Nymphegetes"
(Apollo who looks after the Nymphs). As the god of shepherds he also
had the cult titles "Lukeios" (from lykos; wolf), protecting the
flocks from wolfs, and "Nomius" (of pastures, belonging to shepherds).
Being the god of colonists, Apollo influenced his priests at Delphi to
give divine guidance, as to where the expedition should proceed. This
was during the height of the colonizing era circa 750-550 BCE.
Apollo's title was "Archigetes" (leader of colonists). According to
one legend, it was Apollo who helped either Cretan or Arcadian
colonists found the city of Troy.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Apollo
(http://ancienthistory.about.com/od/apollomyth/) and
(http://forum.kusadasi.biz/thread32.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41685 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Greetings
Salve,

Well, I might just do that. It's getting to be a long thing to type.

Vale,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia

----- Original Message -----
From: "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 12:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Greetings



> Making up names isn¹t a good idea, either: Sempronia is a nomen, not
> a
> cognomen, Audens is a cognomen, and Annia is at best a nomen, not a
> praenomen.
> You might want to follow Liuia Tasia¹s fine lead, and select a more
> accurate
> name, especially since the hyphenated gens-name is no longer necessary.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41686 From: Tasia Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Greetings
Salve,

I was asked about where that came from and I replied it had to do with the SCA. I realize that isn't how Nova Roma works and I'm trying to adjust to the differences between the group.

Tasia
Salve,

I wouldn't think we are the SCA, and making up family members doesn't sit
well with me.

Vale,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tasia" <liviatasia@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 10:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Greetings


> Salve,
>
> For persona development in the SCA a whole family is created including
> father what his profession was etc. So from the names database (at the
> time) I picked a name from each of the different lists.
>
> So, it sounds like a Roman name has to be something that was documented in
> history?
>
> Thank you for all your advice and insight!
>
> Tasia
>
>
>>You're right to say that you need a praenomen, and
> you're right to say that it should probably be the
> same as your father's (though with the -a rather than
> the -us). But, if you'll forgive me asking a personal
> question, whom do you mean by your "father"? I can't
> see any record of any citizen of Nova Roma called Q.
> Livius Tasius.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41688 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Ordo Equester, the Logo, and the Macellum
Ex Officio C. Equitius Cato Aedilis Curulis

Salvete quirites.

In preparation for the completion of an overhaul of our Macellum, I am
issuing this last call for any members of the Ordo Equester, and any
other citizens who may be offering items for sale with the Nova Roma
logo on it, to contact me before the end of the business day tomorrow,
a.d. III Idus Februarius 2759 A.U.C. (10 February 2006) For purposes
of practicality, by "end of business" I mean 5.00pm (17.00h) US
Eastern Time.

I am about to move forward to deal with the possible violation of
licensed use of our trademarked logo (the red flag, gold wreath, and
letters "S P Q R"), which is a serious matter in macronational law as
well as Nova Roman law.

If you are selling any item of any size, shape, or material which has
on it the trademarked logo of the Republic, and you have not contacted
me already, please do so.

Valete bene,

C. Equitius Cato
Aedilis Curulis

Sub manum meum a.d. IV Id. Feb. N. Fabio Buteone Modiano P. Tiberiae
Strabone consulibus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41689 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2325
A. Apollonius L. Equitio omnibusque sal.

> In the matter if naming policy it is true that many
> names that were taken
> from the founding of Nova Roma were completely
> erroneous and that "standards
> were not as high back then"; however, I feel that
> leaves the impression that
> former magistrates weren't doing their jobs. That is
> simply not the case.

You're quite right, and I apologize for giving that
impression. What I meant was simply that the average
standard of Romanitas achieved by new applicants in
choosing their names was not as high - that doesn't
mean that individual magistrates were not striving to
reach high standards. Today's high standard of
achievement is to a great extent based on the steady
progress made in previous years, and in particular the
growing body of knowledge about Roman nomenclature and
the growing acceptance among citizens of the
importance of getting these things right. The early
censores had neither the administrative infrastructure
nor the research-base available to our current
censores.

Having said that, it's important to notice that K.
Buteo was, to my knowledge, the first censor to win
office on an explicit manifesto of improving standards
of nomenclature, and it's certainly my experience that
his censura marked the beginning of a new phase. But
I'm sure he would be the first to acknowledge that the
very fact that a candidate for censor could win office
on such a manifesto shows the work which had already
been done in raising public awareness of the problem.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41690 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Romans in New York City...
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Two interesting bits of news from the Big Apple:

A statue of the goddess Minerva stands in Green-Wood Cemetery in
Brooklyn, and has done so since 1920. She was placed specifically to
salute the raised torch of the Statue of the goddess Liberty. A real
estate developer was going to put up condos which would have blocked
the view between the two goddesses; local outrage has forced the
developer to guarantee that sightlines ("an average height person
standing at the base of the statue of Minerva") will NOT be broken,
and the goddesses can retain their views of each other.


At 57 W 48th Street, a restaurant by the name of The Forum of The
Twelve Caesars was a huge hit in the mid 1950s. Since then, the space
has undergone several re-incarnations as different venues. Now A.J.
Maxwells, a steak house is renovating the building in anticipation of
opening their new restaurant on 13 March. They recently discovered,
buried under plaster and wallpaper, a wall-sized (12'X15') mosiac
mural depicting Roman life. They plan to incorporate the find into
the new restaurant --- and have hired the artist who restores the
murals in the subway to put the finishing touches on it.

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41691 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Greetings
A. Apollonius Liviae Tasiae omnibusque sal.

> For persona development in the SCA a whole family is
> created including father what his profession was
> etc. So from the names database (at the time) I
> picked a name from each of the different lists.

Ah, I see. Well, as you've gathered from the responses
so far, it's quite important to distinguish between
this approach and the one adopted here. Inventing
fictional ancestors has the problem that it looks
rather like role-playing, which is to some extent part
of the SCA's purpose but which is emphatically not
what Nova Roma is about.

Now the tricky thing is that taking a Roman name can
in itself make the exercise seem rather like
role-playing, as though we were all pretending to be
ancient Romans. As was recently pointed out in another
forum, one is not required to change one's name when
taking up, say, U.S. citizenship or French
citizenship. But actually if you look at what the
Romans themselves did you'll see that when a foreigner
acquired Roman citizenship he genuinely did take on a
new name. He would often keep his original name as a
cognomen, and some people still choose this option
when joining Nova Roma; or he might take a new
cognomen. But either way he would add a Roman
praenomen and nomen.

So the reason we take Roman names is not because we
are pretending to be ancient Romans, coming from
families which have held Roman citizenship for
generations. We take them because we acknowledge that
we are foreigners gaining Roman citizenship for the
first time, and we do what such people did in ancient
Rome: we Romanize our names.

I hope that helps to clarify the difference in
attitude.

> So, it sounds like a Roman name has to be something
> that was documented in history?

Well, it depends what we mean by "a Roman name". If "a
Roman name" means a set of three names - praenomen,
nomen, and cognomen - then there is no need for
citizens to have documented historical names. The
number of citizens in Nova Roma who are called the
same thing as an identifiable historical character is
relatively small. There was almost certainly never
anyone in republican history called Aulus Apollonius
Cordus, for example.

However, if by "name" we mean one of the individual
components of the whole name, then to some extent
you're right. The praenomen must be one which was used
in republican times. Moreover, it must normally be one
of the very small number which were commonly used.
There are very rare ones which can be used in special
cases, but the overwhelming majority of citizens have
one or another of the standard ones.

Our current policy (although it is not set in stone
and exceptions may be made) is also to allow only
nomina which are attested from republican times.
Research in this area is still ongoing and it may be
that the policy can be relaxed later when we have a
better understanding of Roman nomenclature. There is
currently one major exception, which is for nomina
which are not attested during the republic but which
already existed in Nova Roma before the current policy
was adopted. A large number of these - the ones which
are not totally and unarguably un-Roman - are still
available for new citizens to choose.

With cognomina much more freedom is allowed. I
mentioned before that it's perfectly acceptable for a
new citizen to have a cognomen which is simply a
Latinized version of his 'real' name, even if this
name never existed in Roman times. A new citizen can
also take a cognomen describing where he comes from
(even if he comes from somewhere which didn't exist in
Roman times) or what he does for a living (even if his
job didn't exist in Roman times). Indeed the only
restrictions are that a cognomen must conform to the
basic characteristics of republican cognomina: for
example, they should not be overly complimentary or
overly vague or abstract, they should be compatible
with Latin grammar, and so on.

I hope that makes things a bit clearer for you, but
please do keep asking if you have more questions -
though if it gets down to the nuts and bolts of your
own specific name we might want to move out of this
forum and start a dialogue between you and the special
censorial office which helps citizens with names.



___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Photos – NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 8p a photo http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41692 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE (Propraetor agenda)
Salve A. Tullia Scholastica,

First of all thank you for your interest and observations regarding
the covening of the Senate.

The agenda regarding the propraetors and resignation of our Italian
interpreter shall be dealt with in another session later in the
month barring any technical glitches. These agenda items are
certainly not being ignored or mislaid but the Senate has some
internal items to take care of and postponed the propraetor issue
until a little latter.

Vale bene!

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus






--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
<fororom@...> wrote:
>
> > Salue, Q. Suetoni Pauline, et saluete, omnes!
> >
> > Firstly, let me thank you for posting this. It is very
important for the
> > quirites to know what goes on in the Senate, especially since
agenda items can
> > get mislaid. Two of the interpreterships below were supposed to
be discussed
> > at the last meeting of the Senate, but somehow didn¹t make it to
the agenda.
> >
> > There may also be missing items this time as well‹this is
the time when
> > the governorship terms expire, and presumably that at which the
incumbents
> > should be prorogued or new candidates considered. In addition,
the
> > resignation of the present interpreter of Italian should be
formally accepted
> > as she is unable to continue.
> >
> > Vale, et ualete,
> >
> > A. Tullia Scholastica
> > Interpres Linguae Latinae
> > Caput Decuriae Interpretum
> >
> > CONVENING OF THE SENATE – FEBRUARY 5, 2006
> >
> >
> > QVINTVS SVETONIVS PAULINUS – TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
> >
> >
> > The Senate is called to order Sunday, February 5, 2006 (2759)
> >
> > Discussion commences from Sunday, February 5, 2006 (2759) until
> > Thursday February 9, 2006 (2759) Rome Time
> >
> > Voting shall commence on Thursday, February 9 at 18:00 hours Rome
> > time.
> >
> > Voting shall end on Monday February 13 at 18:00 hours Rome time
> >
> >
> > Item I: Approval of M. Iulius Severus as an Interpreter of
Spanish
> > and French.
> >
> > [From Iulius Severus: I am a Mexican journalist, living in
Mexico
> > City, with 37 years of
> > experience in daily newspapers, television and radio. I have been
> > editor, editor in chief, war correspondent, special
correspondent,
> > anchor man. Fluent in English; I also read, understand and write
> > French. Currently, I am the president of the Latin American
Circle
> > for International Studies (LACIS), a non-governmental think tank
> > doing research and analysis about disarmament (especially nuclear
> > disarmament), peace and war, democracy, and human rights. I am 56
> > years old, divorced, with six children, none of them living with
me.
> > I got my Masters in Social Sciences (Journalism and
Communications)
> > in the Universidad del Valle de Atemajac (Atemajac Valley
> > University) in Guadalajara, Mexico, 1971.]
> >
> > Item II: Approval of Publius Constantinus Placidus as an
> > Interpreter of Italian.
> > [From P. Constantinus Placidus: I am a former scriba in the
> > Provincia Italia section of Nova Roma, working in the Cohors
> > Prætoria of Marcus Iulius Perusianus. I would like to candidate
> > myself as Interpreter for the English language (English ->
Italian /
> > Italian -> English).]
> >
> > Item III: Approval of Aulus Horatius Severus as an Interpreter
of
> > Portugese.
> >
> > [From A. Horatius Severus: I graduated in Linguistics, I am
> > currently finishing my Master dissertation, and next year I will
be
> > a doctorate student. I study at the University of Sao Paulo.]
> >
> > Item III: Approval of Constitutional Amendment #1 from December
> > 2005 Comitia Centuriata.
> >
> > The Par. IV of Constitution of Nova Roma is amended as follows.
The
> > line:
> >
> > 'An office becomes vacant when the magistrate resigns or dies.'
> > (Article IV, Preface)
> >
> > is hereby replaced by:
> >
> > 'An office becomes vacant when the the sitting magistrate dies or
> > upon a legally valid resignation as defined by pursuant law''"
> >
> > Item IV: Approval of Constitutional Amendment #2 from December
2005
> > Comitia Centuriata.
> >
> > The Constitution of Nova Roma is amended as follows. The line:
> >
> > "E. Tribes and Centuries
> >
> > 1. There shall exist thirty-five tribes, into which the censors
> > shall divide all of the citizens. Thirty-one of these tribes
shall
> > be designated the Rural tribes, and shall be assigned by the
censors
> > as directed by law passed by the comitia populi tributa. Four of
> > these tribes shall be designated the urban tribes, and shall be
made
> > up of those citizens who fail to vote in the annual magisterial
> > elections. Should a member of an urban tribe subsequently vote
in
> > an annual magisterial election, he or she shall be reassigned to
a
> > rural tribe."
> >
> > is hereby replaced by:
> >
> > "E. Tribes and Centuries
> >
> > 1. There shall exist thirty-five tribes, into which the censors
> > shall divide all of the citizens. Thirty-one of these tribes
shall
> > be designated the Rural tribes, and shall be assigned as
directed by
> > law passed by the comitia populi tributa. Four of these tribes
shall
> > be designated the urban tribes, and shall be made up of those
> > citizens designated as Capiti Censi as defined by applicable
law."
> >
> > Item V: Grant of permission to citizen Caius Curius Saturninus
to
> > use the Nova Roma logo, and text of "The Official Nova Roma
> > Calendar" in a printed Roman wall calendar for 2006 and 2007.
> >
> > [From Caius Curius Saturninus: Honourable Senators of Nova Roma,
> >
> > I'm asking for your permission to use a small sized image (less
than
> > 2cm wide) of Nova Roma logo and text "The Official Nova Roma
> > Calendar" in the printed Roman wall calendar I'm preparing. The
> > reason for this request is that I have been asking for a
permission
> > from Collegium Pontificium to use the data they have been
preparing
> > for the Nova Roman religious calendar (which is not published in
> > printed version). I have also asked from the Aediles of this
year to
> > submit me the information they wish to have included about their
> > festivals to the calendar. And I'm member of Ordo Equester
> > currently.
> >
> > By getting the permission to use the above mentioned picture and
> > slogan I'm sure the sale figures of calendar would be
considerably
> > better than without them, and this would make also more revenues
for
> > NR through my Ordo Equester status. I also believe that this
type of
> > Roman wall calendar could be most beneficial for citizens of Nova
> > Roma to learn to live according to Roman calendar as well as for
> > other educational purposes. I have also been planning to
investigate
> > the possibilities to sell calendar outside Nova Roma and in this
way
> > the calendar could help in making Nova Roma known.]
> >
> > Item VI: Elysium Gathering (September 21, 2006 until September
24,
> > 200-6), an event in Ohio, shall be officially co-sponsored by
Nova
> > Roma. Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, the event coordinator of
Elysium
> > Gathering, shall be the contact person between the event and Nova
> > Roma.
> > [Website for Elysium Gathering is here: http://www.three-
> > roads.org/elysium.html]
> >
> >
> > Respectfully,
> >
> > QVINTVS SUETONIVIUS PAVLINVS
> >
> > TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41693 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Ordo Equester, the Logo, and the Macellum
Salve Cato,

By the gods you have a sharp, keen eye when it comes to fine detail.
I went to that site you to which you referred a while back on this
issue and I would never notice the tiny red logo on the mug unless
you had brought it to our attention.

I thank ye gods, I thank ye Lord that Cato is not an IRS or Canada
Customs and Revenue auditor! -:)

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus








--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
>
> Ex Officio C. Equitius Cato Aedilis Curulis
>
> Salvete quirites.
>
> In preparation for the completion of an overhaul of our Macellum,
I am
> issuing this last call for any members of the Ordo Equester, and
any
> other citizens who may be offering items for sale with the Nova
Roma
> logo on it, to contact me before the end of the business day
tomorrow,
> a.d. III Idus Februarius 2759 A.U.C. (10 February 2006) For
purposes
> of practicality, by "end of business" I mean 5.00pm (17.00h) US
> Eastern Time.
>
> I am about to move forward to deal with the possible violation of
> licensed use of our trademarked logo (the red flag, gold wreath,
and
> letters "S P Q R"), which is a serious matter in macronational law
as
> well as Nova Roman law.
>
> If you are selling any item of any size, shape, or material which
has
> on it the trademarked logo of the Republic, and you have not
contacted
> me already, please do so.
>
> Valete bene,
>
> C. Equitius Cato
> Aedilis Curulis
>
> Sub manum meum a.d. IV Id. Feb. N. Fabio Buteone Modiano P.
Tiberiae
> Strabone consulibus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41694 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE (Propraetor agenda)
> Salue, Q. Suetoni Pauline, et saluete, omnes!
>
> Salve A. Tullia Scholastica,
>
> First of all thank you for your interest and observations regarding
> the covening of the Senate.
>
> The agenda regarding the propraetors and resignation of our Italian
> interpreter shall be dealt with in another session later in the
> month barring any technical glitches. These agenda items are
> certainly not being ignored or mislaid but the Senate has some
> internal items to take care of and postponed the propraetor issue
> until a little latter.
>
> ATS: Optime! The propraetorships deserve a Senate session all by
> themselves as there are so many at this time of year, but I wondered how it
> would be possible to appoint a new interpreter when his predecessor hasn¹t
> officially resigned (or been removed...)--the former in this case. Of course,
> in the modern languages we can have more than one interpreter, and really need
> them, especially if they could translate the website and the laws AND GET
> THESE UPLOADED with some cooperation from the relevant magistrate.
>
>
> Vale bene!
>
> Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>
> Et tu, et uos omnes!
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
> <fororom@...> wrote:
>> >
>>> > > Salue, Q. Suetoni Pauline, et saluete, omnes!
>>> > >
>>> > > Firstly, let me thank you for posting this. It is very
> important for the
>>> > > quirites to know what goes on in the Senate, especially since
> agenda items can
>>> > > get mislaid. Two of the interpreterships below were supposed to
> be discussed
>>> > > at the last meeting of the Senate, but somehow didn¹t make it to
> the agenda.
>>> > >
>>> > > There may also be missing items this time as well‹this is
> the time when
>>> > > the governorship terms expire, and presumably that at which the
> incumbents
>>> > > should be prorogued or new candidates considered. In addition,
> the
>>> > > resignation of the present interpreter of Italian should be
> formally accepted
>>> > > as she is unable to continue.
>>> > >
>>> > > Vale, et ualete,
>>> > >
>>> > > A. Tullia Scholastica
>>> > > Interpres Linguae Latinae
>>> > > Caput Decuriae Interpretum
>>> > >
>>> > > CONVENING OF THE SENATE – FEBRUARY 5, 2006
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > QVINTVS SVETONIVS PAULINUS – TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > The Senate is called to order Sunday, February 5, 2006 (2759)
>>> > >
>>> > > Discussion commences from Sunday, February 5, 2006 (2759) until
>>> > > Thursday February 9, 2006 (2759) Rome Time
>>> > >
>>> > > Voting shall commence on Thursday, February 9 at 18:00 hours Rome
>>> > > time.
>>> > >
>>> > > Voting shall end on Monday February 13 at 18:00 hours Rome time
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Item I: Approval of M. Iulius Severus as an Interpreter of
> Spanish
>>> > > and French.
>>> > >
>>> > > [From Iulius Severus: I am a Mexican journalist, living in
> Mexico
>>> > > City, with 37 years of
>>> > > experience in daily newspapers, television and radio. I have been
>>> > > editor, editor in chief, war correspondent, special
> correspondent,
>>> > > anchor man. Fluent in English; I also read, understand and write
>>> > > French. Currently, I am the president of the Latin American
> Circle
>>> > > for International Studies (LACIS), a non-governmental think tank
>>> > > doing research and analysis about disarmament (especially nuclear
>>> > > disarmament), peace and war, democracy, and human rights. I am 56
>>> > > years old, divorced, with six children, none of them living with
> me.
>>> > > I got my Masters in Social Sciences (Journalism and
> Communications)
>>> > > in the Universidad del Valle de Atemajac (Atemajac Valley
>>> > > University) in Guadalajara, Mexico, 1971.]
>>> > >
>>> > > Item II: Approval of Publius Constantinus Placidus as an
>>> > > Interpreter of Italian.
>>> > > [From P. Constantinus Placidus: I am a former scriba in the
>>> > > Provincia Italia section of Nova Roma, working in the Cohors
>>> > > Prætoria of Marcus Iulius Perusianus. I would like to candidate
>>> > > myself as Interpreter for the English language (English ->
> Italian /
>>> > > Italian -> English).]
>>> > >
>>> > > Item III: Approval of Aulus Horatius Severus as an Interpreter
> of
>>> > > Portugese.
>>> > >
>>> > > [From A. Horatius Severus: I graduated in Linguistics, I am
>>> > > currently finishing my Master dissertation, and next year I will
> be
>>> > > a doctorate student. I study at the University of Sao Paulo.]
>>> > >
>>> > > Item III: Approval of Constitutional Amendment #1 from December
>>> > > 2005 Comitia Centuriata.
>>> > >
>>> > > The Par. IV of Constitution of Nova Roma is amended as follows.
> The
>>> > > line:
>>> > >
>>> > > 'An office becomes vacant when the magistrate resigns or dies.'
>>> > > (Article IV, Preface)
>>> > >
>>> > > is hereby replaced by:
>>> > >
>>> > > 'An office becomes vacant when the the sitting magistrate dies or
>>> > > upon a legally valid resignation as defined by pursuant law''"
>>> > >
>>> > > Item IV: Approval of Constitutional Amendment #2 from December
> 2005
>>> > > Comitia Centuriata.
>>> > >
>>> > > The Constitution of Nova Roma is amended as follows. The line:
>>> > >
>>> > > "E. Tribes and Centuries
>>> > >
>>> > > 1. There shall exist thirty-five tribes, into which the censors
>>> > > shall divide all of the citizens. Thirty-one of these tribes
> shall
>>> > > be designated the Rural tribes, and shall be assigned by the
> censors
>>> > > as directed by law passed by the comitia populi tributa. Four of
>>> > > these tribes shall be designated the urban tribes, and shall be
> made
>>> > > up of those citizens who fail to vote in the annual magisterial
>>> > > elections. Should a member of an urban tribe subsequently vote
> in
>>> > > an annual magisterial election, he or she shall be reassigned to
> a
>>> > > rural tribe."
>>> > >
>>> > > is hereby replaced by:
>>> > >
>>> > > "E. Tribes and Centuries
>>> > >
>>> > > 1. There shall exist thirty-five tribes, into which the censors
>>> > > shall divide all of the citizens. Thirty-one of these tribes
> shall
>>> > > be designated the Rural tribes, and shall be assigned as
> directed by
>>> > > law passed by the comitia populi tributa. Four of these tribes
> shall
>>> > > be designated the urban tribes, and shall be made up of those
>>> > > citizens designated as Capiti Censi as defined by applicable
> law."
>>> > >
>>> > > Item V: Grant of permission to citizen Caius Curius Saturninus
> to
>>> > > use the Nova Roma logo, and text of "The Official Nova Roma
>>> > > Calendar" in a printed Roman wall calendar for 2006 and 2007.
>>> > >
>>> > > [From Caius Curius Saturninus: Honourable Senators of Nova Roma,
>>> > >
>>> > > I'm asking for your permission to use a small sized image (less
> than
>>> > > 2cm wide) of Nova Roma logo and text "The Official Nova Roma
>>> > > Calendar" in the printed Roman wall calendar I'm preparing. The
>>> > > reason for this request is that I have been asking for a
> permission
>>> > > from Collegium Pontificium to use the data they have been
> preparing
>>> > > for the Nova Roman religious calendar (which is not published in
>>> > > printed version). I have also asked from the Aediles of this
> year to
>>> > > submit me the information they wish to have included about their
>>> > > festivals to the calendar. And I'm member of Ordo Equester
>>> > > currently.
>>> > >
>>> > > By getting the permission to use the above mentioned picture and
>>> > > slogan I'm sure the sale figures of calendar would be
> considerably
>>> > > better than without them, and this would make also more revenues
> for
>>> > > NR through my Ordo Equester status. I also believe that this
> type of
>>> > > Roman wall calendar could be most beneficial for citizens of Nova
>>> > > Roma to learn to live according to Roman calendar as well as for
>>> > > other educational purposes. I have also been planning to
> investigate
>>> > > the possibilities to sell calendar outside Nova Roma and in this
> way
>>> > > the calendar could help in making Nova Roma known.]
>>> > >
>>> > > Item VI: Elysium Gathering (September 21, 2006 until September
> 24,
>>> > > 200-6), an event in Ohio, shall be officially co-sponsored by
> Nova
>>> > > Roma. Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, the event coordinator of
> Elysium
>>> > > Gathering, shall be the contact person between the event and Nova
>>> > > Roma.
>>> > > [Website for Elysium Gathering is here: http://www.three-
>>> > > roads.org/elysium.html]
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Respectfully,
>>> > >
>>> > > QVINTVS SUETONIVIUS PAVLINVS
>>> > >
>>> > > TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41695 From: Lucius Equitius Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2326
L Equitius A. Tullia et A. Apollonio salutem dicit

Salvete

> L. Equitio Cincinnato Auguri quiritibus, sociis,
> peregrinisque omnibus S.P.D.
>
> L Equitius
> Salve, Corde amice mi
>
> Please excuse me for making a personal response ...
>
> In the matter if naming policy it is true that many names that were taken
> from the founding of Nova Roma were completely erroneous ...
>
> ATS: Good to see you back and posting, Pontifex. You are, of course,
> completely correct: it hasn¹t always been the censores¹ fault that some
of
> the stranger names had to be accepted; as you say below, they had to have
the
> legal framework on which to base their decisions. We are getting some
backed
> up applications from former minors, etc., which have absolutely incredible
> names > Bob.

LECA: Right, anyone with access to the citizen data will be able to enjoy
the virtual fantasy world of Nova Roma names.

> Nova Roma was and
>
> ATS: ???? Is something missing here?

LECA: Please excuse me for not completely editing my post of random ranting
;-)

> So, having served as Censor under those conditions I can say that there
were
> *many* instances when I would have wanted to *mandate* name policies, but
I
> just didn't have *law* on my side.
>
> ATS: Indeed.
>
> An examination of forum archives will reveal many instances of acrid
> discussions of naming policy...
>
> Too, Nova Roma was in a time of very rapid expansion ... and sometimes up
to 20
> applications in a day. Many applications being simply absurd, ...
>
> ATS: We have had as many as 20 applications, or even a bit more, at
times
> since I became scriba. We now have a system in which we Latinists vet the
> names first, then pass them on to a scriba for processing > and efficient.
We also have a series of drop-down menus of names on the
> citizenship application page which limit the choices to genuine Roman
names,
> not any fanciful nonsense with ­us on the end, though even those aren¹t
> perfect yet.

LECA: I had *one* scriba, Marcus Octavius Germanicus, but then he is the
best. I could have not been able to do my work without his assistance on the
computer programming. He also gave great advice in other areas as well.
Indeed, Nova Roma would not have made much progress without him.
That was an era in which magistrates did their own work.

We are in the process of rewriting the text for the citizenship
> application page, and for the the Roman names page; when we get done with
> that, things should be less confusing > The citizenship application test
also cuts down on the number of frivolous
> applications > about joining us as well.

LECA: Believe me I wish I would have had some of these tools.

> A. Tullia Scholastica

________________________________________________________________________

Message: 17
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 14:53:33 +0000 (GMT)
From: "A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...>
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2325

A. Apollonius L. Equitio omnibusque sal.

> In the matter if naming policy ... ; however, I feel that
> leaves the impression that former magistrates weren't doing their jobs.
That is
> simply not the case.

You're quite right, and I apologize for giving that impression. What I meant
was simply that the average standard of Romanitas achieved by new applicants
in choosing their names was not as high - that doesn't mean that individual
magistrates were not striving to reach high standards.

LECA: Thank you.

Today's high standard of achievement is to a great extent based on the
steady progress made in previous years, and in particular the growing body
of knowledge about Roman nomenclature and
the growing acceptance among citizens of the importance of getting these
things right. The early
censores had neither the administrative infrastructure nor the research-base
available to our current
censores.

LECA: It's true that we didn't have large staffs, but we did have knowledge.
Many people simply wanted the name they choose regardless of historical
convention.
We were working in a different atmosphere, one less dictatorial. Applicants
were more free to choose their name. I always felt that it was a personal
choice that reflected the owner. Obviously some applicants didn't have much
knowledge of Rome. Also, we didn't have tests, waiting periods, or taxes.
So, even comparing such close era as Nova Roma now and 5-6 years ago is
problematic.

Having said that, it's important to notice that K. Buteo was, to my
knowledge, the first censor to win
office on an explicit manifesto of improving standards of nomenclature, and
it's certainly my experience that his censura marked the beginning of a new
phase.

LECA: That may be true, but he wasn't in position to make law as Censor,
thus my use of the word 'dictatorial', a new phase indeed.

But I'm sure he would be the first to acknowledge that the very fact that a
candidate for censor could win office on such a manifesto shows the work
which had already been done in raising public awareness of the problem.

LECA: I'd say that the public was well aware of the problem. It wasn't a
novel idea, just as a realistic solution to 'resignations' will not be
novel.
For years naming policy dominated Forum discourse much of the time. Some of
us had been calling for more strict entrance requirements since the very
first days of Nova Roma, and some people wanted near anarchy.

Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41696 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
---Salve A. Tullia Scholastica et Salvete Quirites:


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...>
wrote:

(snip)
>
> ... Two of the interpreterships below were supposed to be
discussed
> > at the last meeting of the Senate, but somehow didn¹t make it to
the agenda.
****

Pompeia: Now I read the above statement and I think, while rubbing
my chin...ok..' two of the interpreterships below somehow didn't
make it to the ballot" I am afraid I don't follow the sequencing of
that statement. If they weren't on the ballot, how can they have not
made it to the ballot, with respect? And I am not sure where you are
sure of what is and isn't being discussed in the Senate with
respect, unless the Tribunes tell you, which I don't see in
Seutonius Tribune's post in this forum today.
From what I can see within the lex Cornelia de Linguis Publicus
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-02-27-ii.html
all of the languages therein have been covered by interpretors, who
are either still serving or prospectives who are being considered by
the senate. I have received no complaints from applicants who have
applied and not appeared on the ballot. And I have forwarded
anything I am aware of to the Senior Consul. I am not beyond making
errors but to the best of my knowledge.
****
> >
> > There may also be missing items this time as well‹this is
the time when
> > the governorship terms expire, and presumably that at which the
incumbents
> > should be prorogued or new candidates considered.
***
Pompeia: I think I've posted that edict twice regarding the
governors. I cannot make you or anyone read it. I have extended
the deadline, and those who wish to be prorogued can see it just
fine, as I am getting responses to it. I have extended the
deadline. Consuls can do that. Such was not vetoed for any
unforseen reason. Consuls may defer tax payments also, as has been
done in the case of economic disparity. I think this extension is
only fair in light of the fact that we didn't have Tribunes until
the latter part of January, and we almost didn't have Consuls. I'm
not sure where you get your deadlines but often time governors are
not prorogued until March.
***


In addition, the
> > resignation of the present interpreter of Italian should be
formally accepted
> > as she is unable to continue.
***
Pompeia: This removes much doubt here, I'm afraid, that you are
being unconstructively picky. I 'wish' resignations of magistrates
had to be 'accepted' to be considered valid. The replacement
interpreter is on the ballot legally.
I am sure you are aware with all the dispute last year over
resignation legislation that its obvious that Consuls do not have
to 'accept' anyone's resignation. Atleast before you say that
publically you might want to read the constitution and laws. For the
sake of those involved.
But given that the former Interpreter Italiae might be entertaining
misinformation regarding this, and undue anxiety, I have written her
with clarification and appreciation. And in your post subsequent to
this, you have weightedly implied that one of the individuals who
has presented himself to the Senate as Interpreter is on the ballot,
or not on the ballot (depending on how one reads your statement)
illegally, and he isnt. How do you think this might make him feel,
with respect?
Again,please read the constitution and resignaton leges, and the
lex Cornelia de Linguis Publicus. With due respect, I'm sure most
magistrates, including Consuls are willing to account for his/her
choices and actions...but really... I think your statements in large
part are observations you view as illegal and untimely.. when in
fact, there is little to credibly complain about at all. As for me,
I am resolved, and I'm herein reminded, that despite doing my best,
I will never please everyone. And I hope and pray that these types
of things above are the worst mistakes I make this year. I can't
imagine any other prudent magistrate thinking differently.



Valete
Pompeia



> >
> > Vale, et ualete,
> >
> > A. Tullia Scholastica
> > Interpres Linguae Latinae
> > Caput Decuriae Interpretum
> >
> > CONVENING OF THE SENATE – FEBRUARY 5, 2006
> >
> >
> > QVINTVS SVETONIVS PAULINUS – TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
> >
> >
> > The Senate is called to order Sunday, February 5, 2006 (2759)
> >
> > Discussion commences from Sunday, February 5, 2006 (2759) until
> > Thursday February 9, 2006 (2759) Rome Time
> >
> > Voting shall commence on Thursday, February 9 at 18:00 hours Rome
> > time.
> >
> > Voting shall end on Monday February 13 at 18:00 hours Rome time
> >
> >
> > Item I: Approval of M. Iulius Severus as an Interpreter of
Spanish
> > and French.
> >
> > [From Iulius Severus: I am a Mexican journalist, living in
Mexico
> > City, with 37 years of
> > experience in daily newspapers, television and radio. I have been
> > editor, editor in chief, war correspondent, special
correspondent,
> > anchor man. Fluent in English; I also read, understand and write
> > French. Currently, I am the president of the Latin American
Circle
> > for International Studies (LACIS), a non-governmental think tank
> > doing research and analysis about disarmament (especially nuclear
> > disarmament), peace and war, democracy, and human rights. I am 56
> > years old, divorced, with six children, none of them living with
me.
> > I got my Masters in Social Sciences (Journalism and
Communications)
> > in the Universidad del Valle de Atemajac (Atemajac Valley
> > University) in Guadalajara, Mexico, 1971.]
> >
> > Item II: Approval of Publius Constantinus Placidus as an
> > Interpreter of Italian.
> > [From P. Constantinus Placidus: I am a former scriba in the
> > Provincia Italia section of Nova Roma, working in the Cohors
> > Prætoria of Marcus Iulius Perusianus. I would like to candidate
> > myself as Interpreter for the English language (English ->
Italian /
> > Italian -> English).]
> >
> > Item III: Approval of Aulus Horatius Severus as an Interpreter
of
> > Portugese.
> >
> > [From A. Horatius Severus: I graduated in Linguistics, I am
> > currently finishing my Master dissertation, and next year I will
be
> > a doctorate student. I study at the University of Sao Paulo.]
> >
> > Item III: Approval of Constitutional Amendment #1 from December
> > 2005 Comitia Centuriata.
> >
> > The Par. IV of Constitution of Nova Roma is amended as follows.
The
> > line:
> >
> > 'An office becomes vacant when the magistrate resigns or dies.'
> > (Article IV, Preface)
> >
> > is hereby replaced by:
> >
> > 'An office becomes vacant when the the sitting magistrate dies or
> > upon a legally valid resignation as defined by pursuant law''"
> >
> > Item IV: Approval of Constitutional Amendment #2 from December
2005
> > Comitia Centuriata.
> >
> > The Constitution of Nova Roma is amended as follows. The line:
> >
> > "E. Tribes and Centuries
> >
> > 1. There shall exist thirty-five tribes, into which the censors
> > shall divide all of the citizens. Thirty-one of these tribes
shall
> > be designated the Rural tribes, and shall be assigned by the
censors
> > as directed by law passed by the comitia populi tributa. Four of
> > these tribes shall be designated the urban tribes, and shall be
made
> > up of those citizens who fail to vote in the annual magisterial
> > elections. Should a member of an urban tribe subsequently vote
in
> > an annual magisterial election, he or she shall be reassigned to
a
> > rural tribe."
> >
> > is hereby replaced by:
> >
> > "E. Tribes and Centuries
> >
> > 1. There shall exist thirty-five tribes, into which the censors
> > shall divide all of the citizens. Thirty-one of these tribes
shall
> > be designated the Rural tribes, and shall be assigned as
directed by
> > law passed by the comitia populi tributa. Four of these tribes
shall
> > be designated the urban tribes, and shall be made up of those
> > citizens designated as Capiti Censi as defined by applicable
law."
> >
> > Item V: Grant of permission to citizen Caius Curius Saturninus
to
> > use the Nova Roma logo, and text of "The Official Nova Roma
> > Calendar" in a printed Roman wall calendar for 2006 and 2007.
> >
> > [From Caius Curius Saturninus: Honourable Senators of Nova Roma,
> >
> > I'm asking for your permission to use a small sized image (less
than
> > 2cm wide) of Nova Roma logo and text "The Official Nova Roma
> > Calendar" in the printed Roman wall calendar I'm preparing. The
> > reason for this request is that I have been asking for a
permission
> > from Collegium Pontificium to use the data they have been
preparing
> > for the Nova Roman religious calendar (which is not published in
> > printed version). I have also asked from the Aediles of this
year to
> > submit me the information they wish to have included about their
> > festivals to the calendar. And I'm member of Ordo Equester
> > currently.
> >
> > By getting the permission to use the above mentioned picture and
> > slogan I'm sure the sale figures of calendar would be
considerably
> > better than without them, and this would make also more revenues
for
> > NR through my Ordo Equester status. I also believe that this
type of
> > Roman wall calendar could be most beneficial for citizens of Nova
> > Roma to learn to live according to Roman calendar as well as for
> > other educational purposes. I have also been planning to
investigate
> > the possibilities to sell calendar outside Nova Roma and in this
way
> > the calendar could help in making Nova Roma known.]
> >
> > Item VI: Elysium Gathering (September 21, 2006 until September
24,
> > 200-6), an event in Ohio, shall be officially co-sponsored by
Nova
> > Roma. Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, the event coordinator of
Elysium
> > Gathering, shall be the contact person between the event and Nova
> > Roma.
> > [Website for Elysium Gathering is here: http://www.three-
> > roads.org/elysium.html]
> >
> >
> > Respectfully,
> >
> > QVINTVS SUETONIVIUS PAVLINVS
> >
> > TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41697 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Greetings
F. Galerius Aurelianus S.P.D.

There are many things that Nova Roma could learn from the Society for
Creative Anachronisms, Inc. in regard to the formation of real world groups and
creating a since of real world community. However, the SCA and NR are different in
that we are dedicated to a specific period and culture of history. Despite
the statement of organization, Nova Roma is essentially modeled on the
Republican Period (500 BC to 100 BC) in out political-administrative organization but
are much wider in our use of the Sacra et Religio. Many of our citizens are
also SCA and there is a certain amount of spill over that can be useful but we
are definitely not the SCA.

Vadete in pacem Cereri.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41698 From: darren_pile Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Salve! A new member here to swell the ranks!
Salve Populusque Romæ.

I thought I'd take the time to introduce myself; my name is Gaius
Livius Crassus, a Plebian living in Brittania. I'm aged 23 and a
father of three.

I've only just received my provisional citizenship for Nova Roma and
have just applied to the Censores to take the citizenship test. I am
anxious to get started in this wondeful new community and am looking
forward to playing my part in its development.

I've held a fascination of Rome for most of my life and its a rare
opportunity to be able to converse with citizens of this great and new
nation.

Gaius Livius Crassus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41699 From: Herick Augusto Werneck Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Inoltra: Re: [NR_Italia] Roma: trovata tomba XI-X secolo A.C
Sempre foi o destino de Roma ser a Senhora do MUNDO! Agora só nos resta guardar o esta velha senhora manteve de melhor!

Maior <rory12001@...> escreveu: M. Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
Here's a more complete article about the archeological
find from the NRItalia list. Get out your dictionaries & enjoy!
valete
M. Hortensia Maior


ecco un articolo più completo. Per quanto mi riguarda non saprei
proprio se una tale sepoltura possa ricollegarsi alla civiltà
villanoviana. L'unica cosa che è sicuramente confermata è
innanzitutto l'antichissima frequentazione nella zona.

Non è la prima sepoltura rinvenuta nel Foro, diverse (anche se più
recenti) sono state rinvenute grossomodo nell'area del Tempio di
Antonino e Faustina. E' bello immaginare i primi sparuti villaggi
sul Palatino e sul Campidoglio, alture maggiormente difendibili e
dall'aria più salubre, e queste antichissime sepolture, in basso, in
quell'area paludosa e malsana che sarebbe diventata la culla della
civiltà romana. Questa scoperta è importantissima, si sta parlando
della tomba un monarca o comunque di una figura che aveva
sicuramente una valenza religiosa all'interno della sua comunità
risalente addirittura a 3.000 anni fa! Il tetto di pietra a forma di
capanna è poi assolutamente evocativo, che sia una specie
di "antenato" del Tempio di Vesta?
Tutto questo proprio sopra il cesariano Tempio di Venere
Genitrice, quasi un rapporto diretto con il potere primigenio.

Valete
Caius Ianus Flaminius


ROMA: Una tomba preistorica sotto il Foro di Cesare
di RAFFAELLA TROILI
Venerdì 20 Gennaio 2006 Il messaggero, Roma


Era il capoclan, il personaggio più importante del suo piccolo
villaggio. Visse quando Roma ancora non esisteva, sull'Arce
capitolina o nella sella collinosa che collegava il Campidoglio al
Quirinale. E da 30 secoli riposava sotto il Foro di Cesare, in una
tomba che se i primi rilievi saranno confermati, dovrebbe
rappresentare uno dei ritrovamenti più antichi fatti finora a Roma.
Ieri la scoperta, con gli archeologi ancora al lavoro sporchi di
terra, il blitz e i complimenti del sindaco Veltroni e
dell'assessore Borgna, l'entusiasmo più forte del freddo. «Si tratta
di una sepoltura protostorica, del periodo di passaggio tra l'età
del bronzo e la prima età del ferro, tra l'XI e X secolo avanti
Cristo», hanno ripetuto ai giornalisti il soprintendente ai Beni
culturali del Comune, Eugenio La Rocca e il direttore dello scavo
Roberto Meneghini. «La tomba a incinerazione era scavata
nell'argilla naturale sotto la pavimentazione del Foro di Cesare». A
insospettire gli archeologi un blocco di tufo a livello
superficiale, sotto il quale hanno trovato una seconda copertura in
tufo. Scavando ancora, la scoperta: la custodia della tomba a
capanna. «Una tomba a forma di pozzo, con un bellissimo tetto di
pietra a capanna, che custodiva una grande un'urna cineraria e otto
vasi in ceramica d'impasto (fatti a mano, il tornio non era stato
ancora inventato) che costituivano il
corredo». Nella tomba e all'interno dei piccoli vasi, che ora come
tutto il resto saranno studiati approfonditamente, sono stati
recuperati anche ossa di uccelli e oggetti in miniatura in bronzo,
in particolare armi. «Anche per questo - ha aggiunto La Rocca -
pensiamo che si tratti della tomba di una personalità, poiché i
grandi personaggi non si facevano seppellire con le armi vere, ma
con piccole riproduzioni. E' probabile che la tomba facesse parte
degli insediamenti sorti sull'Arce capitolina, la collina tagliata
da Giulio Cesare per realizzare il Foro».
Una scoperta importante, hanno sottolineato tutti. Perché risale al
periodo in cui la città ancora non era stata fondata da Romolo, a
quella tarda età del bronzo, su cui c'è ancora molto da scavare.
Tanto che La Rocca e gli uomini della soprintendenza, da Anna De
Santis a Meneghini, già ieri accarezzavano con lo sguardo un altro
pezzo di terra, proprio nei pressi della tomba appena
scoperta. «Altri scavi porteranno alla luce nuove tombe, in questa
zona - ancora il soprintendente - Tutta l'area circostante era
occupata da insediamenti sparsi sui colli. A uno di questi, forse
stanziati sul Campodiglio, apparteneva la sepoltura, che faceva
comunque parte di una più vasta necropoli della quale già nel 2000
furono individuate e scavate altre due tombe». E gli strati di Roma
tornano a galla, la rendono viva e allo stesso tempo immortale:
intorno a quella collina, tagliata in due da Cesare per creare il
Foro, vivevano dunque gruppi di famiglie separati, ognuno col suo
patriarca, il suo
capoclan. «Personaggi di spicco della comunità - ha precisato
Meneghini - alti dignitari, forse sacerdoti, comunque con una carica
legata al sacro». A loro erano riservate sepolture più importanti,
come quella appena scoperta. «Più ricca, anche nella costruzione,
delle altre rinvenute nel 2000, tanto che smontarla non è stato
facile».
Da tempo l'avevano individuata, gli archeologi. I lavori per
riportarla alla luce sono durati una settimana, velocissimi. Ma lo
scavo nella valle del Foro romano, condotto dalla Soprintendenza ai
Beni culturali del Comune, in collaborazione, per la parte
protostorica con i funzionari della Soprintendenza archeologica,
continua. «Siamo nel paleosuolo - spiega Elisabetta Bianchi,
dell'ufficio Fori Imperiali della Soprintendenza indicando un
gradino più alto, quello della Roma di Cesare - qui davanti invece
ci sono tracce di coltivazioni risalenti a 20 secoli dopo, e di
lato, lassù a destra, delle dimore medievali». Dopo cinque anni di
incuria, si sta ripulendo la superficie in questa parte di Foro. Ora
gli archeologi si aspettano altri finanziamenti, perché Roma antica
può riservare ancora molte sorprese. «Questo ritrovamento non è
avvenuto per caso - il commento dell'assessore alla Cultura Gianni
Borgna - ma è il frutto di un lavoro sistematico che da anni stiamo
portando avanti e che
ha già dato importanti risultati. Gli scavi proseguiranno e siamo
certi che porteranno alla luce importanti scoperte».


(fonte: www.patrimoniosos.it)

Antonio Colacino <protesilaoiolao@y...> ha scritto:


Caius Ianus Flaminius <caius_ianus@y...> ha scritto: !!!

Roma: trovata tomba XI-X secolo A.C E' nel Foro
di Cesare ed e' stata scavata nell'argilla (ANSA)-ROMA,19 GEN- Una
tomba a incinerazione e' stata trovata nel Foro di Cesare: risale
all' XI-X secolo avanti Cristo, prima della fondazione della
citta'.La tomba e' stata scavata nell' argilla naturale sottostante
la pavimentazione del Foro. E' a forma di pozzo, profonda circa un
metro e 70 e del diametro di oltre un metro. Dentro era collocata la
teca in pietra a forma di capanna stilizzata che custodiva il
corredo: ovvero un'urna cineraria e altri otto vasi di impasto
(fatta a mano senza l'uso del tornio).

Notizia davvero interessante, se ne sa di più? A che cultura
apparteneva la tomba?Forse Villanoviana?
Grazie,e saluti,
Protesilao




---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3

---------------------------------
Collegamenti utili di Yahoo! Gruppi

Per andare all'homepage del gruppo:
http://it.groups.yahoo.com/group/NR_Italia/

Per annullare l'iscrizione al gruppo, scrivi a:
NR_Italia-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

L'utilizzo da parte tua di Yahoo! Gruppi è soggetto alle
Condizioni Generali di Utilizzo del Servizio.











---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3

--- Fine messaggio inoltrato ---






SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





---------------------------------
Yahoo! doce lar. Faça do Yahoo! sua homepage.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41700 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Salve! A new member here to swell the ranks!
C. Equitius Cato C. Livio Crasso sal.

Salve Livius Crassus,

And welcome to the Republic. Father of three at 23? Ye gods you must
have more patience than I can even imagine :-)

Read up, enjoy; it's a wild and wonderful little place we have here.
All of us magistrates are available for anything you need.

Vale optime,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41701 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Salve! A new member here to swell the ranks!
Severus Crasso Cato omnibusque sal.

Welcome to the Republic, C. Livius Crassus! You just brought to my mind some old memories, because I was a father of four at 22 years old...
Cato is quite right: it's a wild and wonderful little place we have here.

Vale, et valete optime,

M•IVL•SEVERVS

--
_______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.

Powered by Outblaze
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41702 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
> A. Tullia Scholastica Consuli Pompeiae Minuciae-Tiberiae Straboni quiritibus
> S.P.D.
>
> ---Salve A. Tullia Scholastica et Salvete Quirites:
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...>
> wrote:
>
> (snip)
>> >
>> > ... Two of the interpreterships below were supposed to be
> discussed
>>> > > at the last meeting of the Senate, but somehow didn¹t make it to
> the agenda.
> ****
>
> Pompeia: Now I read the above statement and I think, while rubbing
> my chin...ok..' two of the interpreterships below somehow didn't
> make it to the ballot" I am afraid I don't follow the sequencing of
> that statement. If they weren't on the ballot, how can they have not
> made it to the ballot, with respect? And I am not sure where you are
> sure of what is and isn't being discussed in the Senate with
> respect, unless the Tribunes tell you, which I don't see in
> Seutonius Tribune's post in this forum today.
>
> ATS: Consul, you¹re not following me. The candidates for the Spanish and
> Portuguese interpreterships were supposed to have been considered by the
> Senate last year, BEFORE your consulship. Possibly due to former Consul
> Caesar¹s health problems, these items were not put on the Senate agenda. Is
> this clearer now?
>
> From what I can see within the lex Cornelia de Linguis Publicus
> http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-02-27-ii.html
> all of the languages therein have been covered by interpretors, who
> are either still serving or prospectives who are being considered by
> the senate. I have received no complaints from applicants who have
> applied and not appeared on the ballot. And I have forwarded
> anything I am aware of to the Senior Consul. I am not beyond making
> errors but to the best of my knowledge.
>
>
> ATS: This has nothing to do with you. It was an omission by the previous
> administration. The interpreters would not have known when they were being
> considered since the agenda is not always published, as I frankly think it
> should be, if for no better reason than to help prevent errors of omission.
> ****
>>> > >
>>> > > There may also be missing items this time as well‹this is
> the time when
>>> > > the governorship terms expire, and presumably that at which the
> incumbents
>>> > > should be prorogued or new candidates considered.
> ***
> Pompeia: I think I've posted that edict twice regarding the
> governors. I cannot make you or anyone read it. I have extended
> the deadline, and those who wish to be prorogued can see it just
> fine, as I am getting responses to it. I have extended the
> deadline. Consuls can do that. Such was not vetoed for any
> unforseen reason. Consuls may defer tax payments also, as has been
> done in the case of economic disparity. I think this extension is
> only fair in light of the fact that we didn't have Tribunes until
> the latter part of January, and we almost didn't have Consuls. I'm
> not sure where you get your deadlines but often time governors are
> not prorogued until March.
>
> ***
>
> ATS: Not only can¹t you make them read it, you can¹t make them understand
> it. Again, you¹re misunderstanding me. Usually the governorships expire on
> Kal. Mar., and this would normally be the only Senate session before then.
>
> In addition, the
>>> > > resignation of the present interpreter of Italian should be
> formally accepted
>>> > > as she is unable to continue.
> ***
> Pompeia: This removes much doubt here, I'm afraid, that you are
> being unconstructively picky. I 'wish' resignations of magistrates
> had to be 'accepted' to be considered valid. The replacement
> interpreter is on the ballot legally.
>
> ATS: Yes, of course the replacement interpreter is on the ballot
> legally‹it just would make better sense to have his predecessor resign first.
> It might look as though she were being forced out, when she isn¹t.
>
> I am sure you are aware with all the dispute last year over
> resignation legislation that its obvious that Consuls do not have
> to 'accept' anyone's resignation. Atleast before you say that
> publically you might want to read the constitution and laws. For the
> sake of those involved.
>
> ATS: I not only read the Constitution and the laws, I proofread them, and
> corrected them‹not that any seems terribly relevant here. This is just simple
> good sense.
>
> But given that the former Interpreter Italiae might be entertaining
> misinformation regarding this, and undue anxiety, I have written her
> with clarification and appreciation. And in your post subsequent to
> this, you have weightedly implied that one of the individuals who
> has presented himself to the Senate as Interpreter is on the ballot,
> or not on the ballot (depending on how one reads your statement)
> illegally, and he isnt. How do you think this might make him feel,
> with respect?
>
> ATS: You are misunderstanding me again. Placidus is on the ballot
> legally. We also hope to have him help us in other capacities as well. His
> English is very good, and he is well qualified for the post of interpreter of
> Italian.
>
> Again,please read the constitution and resignaton leges, and the
> lex Cornelia de Linguis Publicus.
>
> ATS: The Lex Cornelia de Linguis Publicis is sent to Latinitas every
> month along with the old and new charters. It¹s also sent to our charter
> revision commission board. I¹ve read it quite often.
>
> With due respect, I'm sure most
> magistrates, including Consuls are willing to account for his/her
> choices and actions...but really... I think your statements in large
> part are observations you view as illegal and untimely.. when in
> fact, there is little to credibly complain about at all. As for me,
> I am resolved, and I'm herein reminded, that despite doing my best,
> I will never please everyone. And I hope and pray that these types
> of things above are the worst mistakes I make this year. I can't
> imagine any other prudent magistrate thinking differently.
>
> ATS: Once again, you are misunderstanding me. All I did was ask whether or
> not the Senate agenda had been published in its entirety because, as those of
> us who have been here a while are aware, this is the time when the governors
> are normally prorogued. I also asked about the interpretership. I happen to
> be the head of the decuria of interpreters, and these matters concern me. We
> want to translate parts of the website for the sake of non-English speaking
> prospective citizens and others. We would like to have qualified interpreters
> for this, and the more, the merrier (lest the present interpreter of
> Portuguese think he is being replaced‹he¹s not, just being helped).
>
> I am not complaining about anything. I am merely asking. There is a
> difference.
>
>
> Valete
> Pompeia
>
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
> Caput Decuriae Interpretum
>
>
>
>>> > >
>>> > > Vale, et ualete,
>>> > >
>>> > > A. Tullia Scholastica
>>> > > Interpres Linguae Latinae
>>> > > Caput Decuriae Interpretum
>>> > >
>>> > > CONVENING OF THE SENATE – FEBRUARY 5, 2006
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > QVINTVS SVETONIVS PAULINUS – TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > The Senate is called to order Sunday, February 5, 2006 (2759)
>>> > >
>>> > > Discussion commences from Sunday, February 5, 2006 (2759) until
>>> > > Thursday February 9, 2006 (2759) Rome Time
>>> > >
>>> > > Voting shall commence on Thursday, February 9 at 18:00 hours Rome
>>> > > time.
>>> > >
>>> > > Voting shall end on Monday February 13 at 18:00 hours Rome time
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Item I: Approval of M. Iulius Severus as an Interpreter of
> Spanish
>>> > > and French.
>>> > >
>>> > > [From Iulius Severus: I am a Mexican journalist, living in
> Mexico
>>> > > City, with 37 years of
>>> > > experience in daily newspapers, television and radio. I have been
>>> > > editor, editor in chief, war correspondent, special
> correspondent,
>>> > > anchor man. Fluent in English; I also read, understand and write
>>> > > French. Currently, I am the president of the Latin American
> Circle
>>> > > for International Studies (LACIS), a non-governmental think tank
>>> > > doing research and analysis about disarmament (especially nuclear
>>> > > disarmament), peace and war, democracy, and human rights. I am 56
>>> > > years old, divorced, with six children, none of them living with
> me.
>>> > > I got my Masters in Social Sciences (Journalism and
> Communications)
>>> > > in the Universidad del Valle de Atemajac (Atemajac Valley
>>> > > University) in Guadalajara, Mexico, 1971.]
>>> > >
>>> > > Item II: Approval of Publius Constantinus Placidus as an
>>> > > Interpreter of Italian.
>>> > > [From P. Constantinus Placidus: I am a former scriba in the
>>> > > Provincia Italia section of Nova Roma, working in the Cohors
>>> > > Prætoria of Marcus Iulius Perusianus. I would like to candidate
>>> > > myself as Interpreter for the English language (English ->
> Italian /
>>> > > Italian -> English).]
>>> > >
>>> > > Item III: Approval of Aulus Horatius Severus as an Interpreter
> of
>>> > > Portugese.
>>> > >
>>> > > [From A. Horatius Severus: I graduated in Linguistics, I am
>>> > > currently finishing my Master dissertation, and next year I will
> be
>>> > > a doctorate student. I study at the University of Sao Paulo.]
>>> > >
>>> > > Item III: Approval of Constitutional Amendment #1 from December
>>> > > 2005 Comitia Centuriata.
>>> > >
>>> > > The Par. IV of Constitution of Nova Roma is amended as follows.
> The
>>> > > line:
>>> > >
>>> > > 'An office becomes vacant when the magistrate resigns or dies.'
>>> > > (Article IV, Preface)
>>> > >
>>> > > is hereby replaced by:
>>> > >
>>> > > 'An office becomes vacant when the the sitting magistrate dies or
>>> > > upon a legally valid resignation as defined by pursuant law''"
>>> > >
>>> > > Item IV: Approval of Constitutional Amendment #2 from December
> 2005
>>> > > Comitia Centuriata.
>>> > >
>>> > > The Constitution of Nova Roma is amended as follows. The line:
>>> > >
>>> > > "E. Tribes and Centuries
>>> > >
>>> > > 1. There shall exist thirty-five tribes, into which the censors
>>> > > shall divide all of the citizens. Thirty-one of these tribes
> shall
>>> > > be designated the Rural tribes, and shall be assigned by the
> censors
>>> > > as directed by law passed by the comitia populi tributa. Four of
>>> > > these tribes shall be designated the urban tribes, and shall be
> made
>>> > > up of those citizens who fail to vote in the annual magisterial
>>> > > elections. Should a member of an urban tribe subsequently vote
> in
>>> > > an annual magisterial election, he or she shall be reassigned to
> a
>>> > > rural tribe."
>>> > >
>>> > > is hereby replaced by:
>>> > >
>>> > > "E. Tribes and Centuries
>>> > >
>>> > > 1. There shall exist thirty-five tribes, into which the censors
>>> > > shall divide all of the citizens. Thirty-one of these tribes
> shall
>>> > > be designated the Rural tribes, and shall be assigned as
> directed by
>>> > > law passed by the comitia populi tributa. Four of these tribes
> shall
>>> > > be designated the urban tribes, and shall be made up of those
>>> > > citizens designated as Capiti Censi as defined by applicable
> law."
>>> > >
>>> > > Item V: Grant of permission to citizen Caius Curius Saturninus
> to
>>> > > use the Nova Roma logo, and text of "The Official Nova Roma
>>> > > Calendar" in a printed Roman wall calendar for 2006 and 2007.
>>> > >
>>> > > [From Caius Curius Saturninus: Honourable Senators of Nova Roma,
>>> > >
>>> > > I'm asking for your permission to use a small sized image (less
> than
>>> > > 2cm wide) of Nova Roma logo and text "The Official Nova Roma
>>> > > Calendar" in the printed Roman wall calendar I'm preparing. The
>>> > > reason for this request is that I have been asking for a
> permission
>>> > > from Collegium Pontificium to use the data they have been
> preparing
>>> > > for the Nova Roman religious calendar (which is not published in
>>> > > printed version). I have also asked from the Aediles of this
> year to
>>> > > submit me the information they wish to have included about their
>>> > > festivals to the calendar. And I'm member of Ordo Equester
>>> > > currently.
>>> > >
>>> > > By getting the permission to use the above mentioned picture and
>>> > > slogan I'm sure the sale figures of calendar would be
> considerably
>>> > > better than without them, and this would make also more revenues
> for
>>> > > NR through my Ordo Equester status. I also believe that this
> type of
>>> > > Roman wall calendar could be most beneficial for citizens of Nova
>>> > > Roma to learn to live according to Roman calendar as well as for
>>> > > other educational purposes. I have also been planning to
> investigate
>>> > > the possibilities to sell calendar outside Nova Roma and in this
> way
>>> > > the calendar could help in making Nova Roma known.]
>>> > >
>>> > > Item VI: Elysium Gathering (September 21, 2006 until September
> 24,
>>> > > 200-6), an event in Ohio, shall be officially co-sponsored by
> Nova
>>> > > Roma. Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, the event coordinator of
> Elysium
>>> > > Gathering, shall be the contact person between the event and Nova
>>> > > Roma.
>>> > > [Website for Elysium Gathering is here: http://www.three-
>>> > > roads.org/elysium.html]
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Respectfully,
>>> > >
>>> > > QVINTVS SUETONIVIUS PAVLINVS
>>> > >
>>> > > TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
>>> > >
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41703 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Salve! A new member here to swell the ranks!
Salve Gai Livi Crasse,

Welcome to Nova Roma! It is always refreshing and uplifting to see
new citizens joining our ranks with such interest and enthusiasm.
There are many citizens here always willing and eager to help and
don't heistate to contact me if you have concerns, questions or need
help of any kind.

Vale bene!

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus

Tribunus Plebis

Senator






--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "darren_pile" <devon199@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Populusque Romæ.
>
> I thought I'd take the time to introduce myself; my name is Gaius
> Livius Crassus, a Plebian living in Brittania. I'm aged 23 and a
> father of three.
>
> I've only just received my provisional citizenship for Nova Roma
and
> have just applied to the Censores to take the citizenship test. I
am
> anxious to get started in this wondeful new community and am
looking
> forward to playing my part in its development.
>
> I've held a fascination of Rome for most of my life and its a
rare
> opportunity to be able to converse with citizens of this great and
new
> nation.
>
> Gaius Livius Crassus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41704 From: Tasia Date: 2006-02-09
Subject: Re: Greetings
Salve,

Thank you for the description - I will print it out and add it to my notes, it was indeed very helpful. I thought Nova Roma had Legio's and other groups that held events though not similar in style to the SCA but similar in thought. Meaning, recreating marches, camping, - the livelihood and existence of the Republic. I don't mean to refer to the other group so much except that it's what I have to compare to and I have hopes that if I learn things correctly, then perhaps I can teach other correctly and there would be enough interest in a larger group here in the Pacific Northwest.

Julilla has been a wonderful guide to many people here interested in all things Roman. She is truly a role model.

Tasia

>Ah, I see. Well, as you've gathered from the responses
so far, it's quite important to distinguish between
this approach and the one adopted here. Inventing
fictional ancestors has the problem that it looks
rather like role-playing, which is to some extent part
of the SCA's purpose but which is emphatically not
what Nova Roma is about.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41705 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: Greetings
> Salue, Tasia, et saluete, omnes!
>
> Salve,
>
> Thank you for the description - I will print it out and add it to my notes, it
> was indeed very helpful. I thought Nova Roma had Legio's and other groups that
> held events though not similar in style to the SCA but similar in thought.
> Meaning, recreating marches, camping, - the livelihood and existence of the
> Republic.
>
> ATS: Indeed Nova Roma does indeed have affiliated legiones which do
> conduct reenactment events, though most do not engage in fighting. Some, at
> least, do camp, and have affiliated civilians who join in these events. I
> happen to be one of those affiliated civilians. However, most of the legiones
> reproduce the period of the early Empire, partly because the evidence for the
> construction of the armor, etc., is better for the slightly later period. If
> you visit the webpages of Legio XX (which is not affiliated with NR, but with
> which NR citizens participate) or Legio XXIV (affiliated), you will learn a
> lot about this aspect of NR. We are not, however, a reenactment organization;
> we are one which has reenactors among its members. Legio XX is at
> <http://www.larp.com/legionxx/> and Legio XXIV at <http://www.legionxxiv.org>
> Both have links which will point you to legiones in your area (if there are
> any).
>
> I don't mean to refer to the other group so much except that it's what I have
> to compare to and I have hopes that if I learn things correctly, then perhaps
> I can teach other correctly and there would be enough interest in a larger
> group here in the Pacific Northwest.
>
> ATS: Please ignore any sniping. Some among us on this list like to
> attack the newbies‹which is why we have a list just for the tyros. Cordus
> isn¹t one of them, however.
>
> Julilla has been a wonderful guide to many people here interested in all
> things Roman. She is truly a role model.
>
> ATS: Yes, she is.
>
> Tasia
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica


>
>> >Ah, I see. Well, as you've gathered from the responses
> so far, it's quite important to distinguish between
> this approach and the one adopted here. Inventing
> fictional ancestors has the problem that it looks
> rather like role-playing, which is to some extent part
> of the SCA's purpose but which is emphatically not
> what Nova Roma is about.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41706 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: Greetings
> Salue, T. Artoria Marcella, et saluete, omnes!
>
> Salve Tullia Scholastica et salvete omnes,
>
>> >A cognomen is desirable, but not required;
>
> There seems to be conflicting information regarding the necessity of adopting
> a cognomen. The application suggests that a cognomen is optional, but the
> page which guides applicants through the process of choosing a name states
> that it is mandatory. When I applied for citizenship back in Sept. I sent my
> application in without a cognomen and was told that I had to have one.
>
> ATS: Part of the reason that there is conflicting information on the
> websites is that the webpages are in the process of being updated. In
> addition, research is ongoing, particularly with regard to the nomina and
> cognomina. We expect to have a new text for the citizenship application page
> fairly soon, but it must then be uploaded. Next project is the Via Romana
> names page...
>
> The cognomen is the most distinctive part of the name. It isn¹t required
> in NR, but suppose we had fifteen active men named Marcus Sempronius. How
> would we distinguish them? M. Sempronius I, M. Sempronius II, etc.? That¹s
> not very Roman. It¹s much better to have a cognomen.
>
>
> Personally, I think the cognomen should be optional for men and the praenomen
> optional for women. It would be more in keeping with the naming conventions
> of the late Republic.
>
> ATS: As M. Hortensia pointed out, newer research on women¹s names seems
> to indicate that praenomina were more common than previously thought. In
> addition, this practice makes women equal to men. Women with only clan names
> is more like something we would expect from the Ferengi than from NR. Surely
> you don¹t think that women are inferior, now do you?
>
> Vale et valete,
> T. Artoria Marcella
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> 1. Tullia Scholastica
> 2.
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41707 From: darren_pile Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: Salve! A new member here to swell the ranks!
Thank you all for such a warm welcome, I look forward to getting to
know you all.

G. Livius Crassus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
(Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Gai Livi Crasse,
>
> Welcome to Nova Roma! It is always refreshing and uplifting to see
> new citizens joining our ranks with such interest and enthusiasm.
> There are many citizens here always willing and eager to help and
> don't heistate to contact me if you have concerns, questions or
need
> help of any kind.
>
> Vale bene!
>
> Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>
> Tribunus Plebis
>
> Senator
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "darren_pile" <devon199@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Populusque Romæ.
> >
> > I thought I'd take the time to introduce myself; my name is
Gaius
> > Livius Crassus, a Plebian living in Brittania. I'm aged 23 and a
> > father of three.
> >
> > I've only just received my provisional citizenship for Nova
Roma
> and
> > have just applied to the Censores to take the citizenship test.
I
> am
> > anxious to get started in this wondeful new community and am
> looking
> > forward to playing my part in its development.
> >
> > I've held a fascination of Rome for most of my life and its a
> rare
> > opportunity to be able to converse with citizens of this great
and
> new
> > nation.
> >
> > Gaius Livius Crassus
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41708 From: David Kling Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus A. Tulliae Scholasticae salutem dicit

If there are items that you, or any other citizen, believes should be on the
senate agenda please let me know and after review I will add the item to the
senate agenda if appropriate. We will be calling the senate to order very
soon to address further business, so we can add additional items if needed.

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Consul

On 2/9/06, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...> wrote:
>
>
> > ATS: Consul, you¹re not following me. The candidates for the
> Spanish and
> > Portuguese interpreterships were supposed to have been considered by the
> > Senate last year, BEFORE your consulship. Possibly due to former Consul
> > Caesar¹s health problems, these items were not put on the Senate
> agenda. Is
> > this clearer now?
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41709 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Absent
Salvete omnes,

I'll be on the move in the babrarian wilderness over the next day or
two so I shall be off line. Some of you have my cell no. if you need
to get a hold of me. Have a great weekend!


Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41710 From: rysullivan Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Ancient preRoman burials found in Rome
TITUS LICINIUS CRASSUS CIVIBUS S.P.D.



This may be the same find that was reported last month, but I beleive
it's a new article.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/02/0207_060207_rome_tomb.ht\
ml
<http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/02/0207_060207_rome_tomb.h\
tml>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41711 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem IV Idus Februarius; haec dies nefastus est.

"After Fufetius had thus spoken and his proposal had been received
with general approbation (for the most important both of the Romans
p61 and Albans were with the two leaders), Tullius, after a short
pause, spoke as follows:

" [Tullius speaks] 'In other respects, Fufetius, you seem to me to
have reasoned well; for it must be some wonderful fortune that has
produced in both our cities in our generation a similarity of birth
never known before. But of one consideration you seem to be unaware —
a matter which will cause great reluctance in the youths if we ask
them to fight with one another. For the mother of our Horatii is
sister to the mother of the Alban Curiatii, and the young men have
been brought up in the arms of both the women and cherish and love one
another no less than their own brothers. Consider, therefore, whether,
as they are cousins and have been brought up together, it would not be
impious in us to put arms in their hands and invite them to mutual
slaughter. For the pollution of kindred blood, if they are compelled
to stain their hands with one another's blood, will deservedly fall
upon us who compel them.'

To this Fufetius answered: 'Neither have I failed, Tullius, to note
the kinship of the youths, nor did I purpose to compel them to fight
with their cousins unless they themselves were inclined to undertake
the combat. But as soon as this plan came into my mind I sent for the
Alban Curiatii and sacred them in private to learn whether they were
willing to engage in the combat; and it was only after they had
accepted the proposal with incredible and wonderful alacrity that I
decided to disclose my plan and bring it forward for consideration.
And I advise you to take the same course yourself — to send for the
triplets on your side and sound out their disposition. And if they,
too, agree of their own accord to risk their lives for their country,
accept the favour; but if hesitate, bring no compulsion to bear upon
them. I predict, however, the same result with them as with our own
youths — that is, if they are such men as we have been informed, like
the few most highly endowed by Nature, and are brave in arms; for the
reputation of their valour has reached us also.' " - Dionysius of
Halicarnassus 3.15


On this day, tradition says, Pharoah Thutmosis III of Egypt was
victorious in a battle on the plains of Meggido in Palestine in1468
B.C. Tuthmosis III fought with considerable nerve and cunning. On
this campaign, he marched to Gaza in ten days and from Yehem, planned
the battle to take take Megiddo which was held by a rebellious prince
named Kadesh. There were three possible approaches to Megiddo, two of
which were fairly open, straightforward routes while the third was
through a narrow pass that soldiers would only be able to march
through in single file.

Though he was advised against this dangerous pass by his commanders,
Tuthmosis not only took this dangerous route, but actually led the
troops through. Whether by luck, or gifted intuition this gamble paid
off, for when he emerged from the tight canyon, he saw that his
enemies had arranged their armies to defend the easier routes. In
fact, he emerged between the north and south wings of the enemy's
armies, and the next day decisively beat them in battle. It apparently
took a long siege (seven months) to take the city of Megiddo, but the
rewards were great. The spoils were considerable, and included 894
chariots, including two covered with gold, 200 suites of armor
including two of bronze, as well as over 2,000 horses and 25,000 other
animals. The human slaughter was so great (some casualty estimates
range between 30,000 - 50,000) that the site of the battle passed into
local lore; both Hebrew and Christian tradition have the final battle
between Good and Evil taking place at "har-Meggido" or Armaggedon.

Tuthmosis III had marched from Thebes up the Syrian coast fighting
decisive battles, capturing three cities, and then returned back to
Thebes. Over the next 18 years, his armies would march against Syria
every summer and by the end of that period, he established Egyptian
dominance over Palestine. At Karnak he records the capture of 350
cities, and in the 42nd year of his rule, Kadesh itself was finally taken.


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Thutmosis III
(http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/tuthmosis3.htm)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41712 From: darren_pile Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
Salve,

Would it be possible to get some more Nova Roma coinage minted?

Gaius Livius Crassus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...>
wrote:
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus A. Tulliae Scholasticae salutem dicit
>
> If there are items that you, or any other citizen, believes should
be on the
> senate agenda please let me know and after review I will add the
item to the
> senate agenda if appropriate. We will be calling the senate to
order very
> soon to address further business, so we can add additional items
if needed.
>
> Vale:
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
> Consul
>
> On 2/9/06, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > ATS: Consul, you¹re not following me. The candidates for
the
> > Spanish and
> > > Portuguese interpreterships were supposed to have been
considered by the
> > > Senate last year, BEFORE your consulship. Possibly due to
former Consul
> > > Caesar¹s health problems, these items were not put on the
Senate
> > agenda. Is
> > > this clearer now?
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41713 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
Salve Gai Livi,

> Would it be possible to get some more Nova Roma coinage minted?

We have people working on a new series of coins even now. The senate
approved the design during the December senate meeting.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41714 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Fabio Buteoni Modiano quiritibus omnibus S.P.D.
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus A. Tulliae Scholasticae salutem dicit
>
> If there are items that you, or any other citizen, believes should be on the
> senate agenda please let me know and after review I will add the item to the
> senate agenda if appropriate. We will be calling the senate to order very
> soon to address further business, so we can add additional items if needed.
>
>
> ATS: Thank you. I shall do that. Most of the matters I mentioned,
> however, were supposedly scheduled for last December¹s session, but didn¹t
> make it to the agenda‹if the agenda had been published in advance, we could
> have corrected this, and the two interpreters might have been approved
> earlier. This is not the fault of any of the present magistrates, and may not
> be the fault of any from last year; none of us is perfect, or free from the
> ability to lose things. When our health is compromised by painful and
> seemingly incurable injuries and/or illnesses, that probability escalates.
>
> Vale:
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
> Consul
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
> Rogatrix
> Caput Decuriae Interpretum
>
> On 2/9/06, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>>> > > ATS: Consul, you¹re not following me. The candidates for the
>> > Spanish and
>>> > > Portuguese interpreterships were supposed to have been considered by the
>>> > > Senate last year, BEFORE your consulship. Possibly due to former Consul
>>> > > Caesar¹s health problems, these items were not put on the Senate
>> > agenda. Is
>>> > > this clearer now?
>> >




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41715 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "darren_pile" <devon199@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> Would it be possible to get some more Nova Roma coinage minted?
>
> Gaius Livius Crassus
>


Just like a Crassus, always interested in money :-O.

Vale,

G. Popillius Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41716 From: darren_pile Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE
Makes the world go round!!!

Parthia sounds like a nice place to vacation............


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiuspopilliuslaenas"
<gaiuspopillius@...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "darren_pile" <devon199@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve,
> >
> > Would it be possible to get some more Nova Roma coinage minted?
> >
> > Gaius Livius Crassus
> >
>
>
> Just like a Crassus, always interested in money :-O.
>
> Vale,
>
> G. Popillius Laenas
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41717 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: EDICTVM CENSORIVM
EDICTVM CENSORIVM DE SCRIBA CREANDO

Ex hoc, P. Constantinum Placidum scribam linguae Italicae creo. Nullum
ius iurandum ab eo postulabitur.

By this edict, I appoint P. Constantinus Placidus as scriba for the
Italian language. He will not be required to swear any oath.

Datum sub manu mea a. d. IV Id. Feb. MMDCCLIX

Given under my hand this tenth day of February 2006 C.E.

Cn. Equitius Marinus, Censor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41718 From: darren_pile Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Adding Photos?
Salvete,


Hi, i'm new to all this and I've got a quick question. How do you add
a photo to your Nova Roma account? It doesn't seem like an available
feature in 'my preferences' but I'm only a provisional citizen (got to
wait a month or two til I'm a full citizen). Is this the reason why I
can't add a photo?

Gaius Livius Crassus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41719 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Salve Gai Livi,

Just send the image file to webmaster AT novaroma DOT org with a request
to have it added to your Album Civium page.

Vale,

-- Marinus

darren_pile wrote:

> Salvete,
>
>
> Hi, i'm new to all this and I've got a quick question. How do you add
> a photo to your Nova Roma account?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41720 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Salve,

It'd be nice if there was a way you could do it yourself. Why doesn't Nova
Roma use a standard php content manager?

Vale,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia



----- Original Message -----
From: "Gnaeus Equitius Marinus" <gawne@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Adding Photos?


> Salve Gai Livi,
>
> Just send the image file to webmaster AT novaroma DOT org with a request
> to have it added to your Album Civium page.
>
> Vale,
>
> -- Marinus
>
> darren_pile wrote:
>
>> Salvete,
>>
>>
>> Hi, i'm new to all this and I've got a quick question. How do you add
>> a photo to your Nova Roma account?
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41721 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
SALVE !

I guess from this reason :
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/edicts/magisterar-2005-02-27b.html
And I belive is a reasonable one.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

annia@... wrote:
Salve,

It'd be nice if there was a way you could do it yourself. Why doesn't Nova
Roma use a standard php content manager?

Vale,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia



----- Original Message -----
From: "Gnaeus Equitius Marinus" <gawne@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Adding Photos?


> Salve Gai Livi,
>
> Just send the image file to webmaster AT novaroma DOT org with a request
> to have it added to your Album Civium page.
>
> Vale,
>
> -- Marinus
>
> darren_pile wrote:
>
>> Salvete,
>>
>>
>> Hi, i'm new to all this and I've got a quick question. How do you add
>> a photo to your Nova Roma account?
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------







NOVA ROMANI !
Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support page to your websites.
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm

"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41722 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
> It'd be nice if there was a way you could do it yourself.

That was intentionally left out so that we could ensure that the
size and content of submitted photos was appropriate. No photo can
be posted without review.

> Why doesn't Nova Roma use a standard php content manager?

We have something planned for this year.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41723 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Salve,

Actually that just seems like a reason why they don't allow rated R photos.

Vale,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia

----- Original Message -----
From: "iulius sabinus" <iulius_sabinus@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Adding Photos?


> SALVE !
>
> I guess from this reason :
> http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/edicts/magisterar-2005-02-27b.html
> And I belive is a reasonable one.
>
> VALE BENE,
> IVL SABINVS
>
> annia@... wrote:
> Salve,
>
> It'd be nice if there was a way you could do it yourself. Why doesn't Nova
> Roma use a standard php content manager?
>
> Vale,
>
> Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gnaeus Equitius Marinus" <gawne@...>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 7:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Adding Photos?
>
>
>> Salve Gai Livi,
>>
>> Just send the image file to webmaster AT novaroma DOT org with a request
>> to have it added to your Album Civium page.
>>
>> Vale,
>>
>> -- Marinus
>>
>> darren_pile wrote:
>>
>>> Salvete,
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi, i'm new to all this and I've got a quick question. How do you add
>>> a photo to your Nova Roma account?
>>
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test Fall of the
> roman empire The roman empire
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> NOVA ROMANI !
> Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support page to
> your websites.
> http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm
>
> "Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Mail
> Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41724 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-02-10
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
SALVE !

There are a lot of reasons.

I saw your works. And your websites. Very nice and interesting. You
can help the Magna Mater Project if you add the new logo and the
link to your pagan websites and to those which have nova roman
subject.
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, <annia@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> Actually that just seems like a reason why they don't allow rated
R photos.
>
> Vale,
>
> Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "iulius sabinus" <iulius_sabinus@...>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 11:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Adding Photos?
>
>
> > SALVE !
> >
> > I guess from this reason :
> > http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/edicts/magisterar-2005-02-
27b.html
> > And I belive is a reasonable one.
> >
> > VALE BENE,
> > IVL SABINVS
> >
> > annia@... wrote:
> > Salve,
> >
> > It'd be nice if there was a way you could do it yourself. Why
doesn't Nova
> > Roma use a standard php content manager?
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Gnaeus Equitius Marinus" <gawne@...>
> > To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 7:44 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Adding Photos?
> >
> >
> >> Salve Gai Livi,
> >>
> >> Just send the image file to webmaster AT novaroma DOT org with
a request
> >> to have it added to your Album Civium page.
> >>
> >> Vale,
> >>
> >> -- Marinus
> >>
> >> darren_pile wrote:
> >>
> >>> Salvete,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi, i'm new to all this and I've got a quick question. How do
you add
> >>> a photo to your Nova Roma account?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> > Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
Fall of the
> > roman empire The roman empire
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> >
> > Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > NOVA ROMANI !
> > Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support
page to
> > your websites.
> > http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm
> >
> > "Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius
Claudius
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Mail
> > Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41725 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Salve,

Regarding the prevention of bad photos, alls you have to do is implement a
moderator to handle them. I've seen other sites do this, you submit the
photo via an upload form and then it is approved by someone.

It's only a suggestion. I figure it'd streamline the process, and it might
encourage citizens submit photos which I think is nice. I like knowing the
face of the person I'm talking to or reading about.

Vale,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Hucke" <hucke@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 11:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Adding Photos?


>
>
>> It'd be nice if there was a way you could do it yourself.
>
> That was intentionally left out so that we could ensure that the
> size and content of submitted photos was appropriate. No photo can
> be posted without review.
>
>> Why doesn't Nova Roma use a standard php content manager?
>
> We have something planned for this year.
>
> --
> hucke@...
> http://www.graveyards.com
>
> "The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
> voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41726 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Salve!

Sure no problem. I'll get on that ASAP.

Vale,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia

----- Original Message -----
From: "Titus Iulius Sabinus" <iulius_sabinus@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 11:55 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Adding Photos?


> SALVE !
>
> There are a lot of reasons.
>
> I saw your works. And your websites. Very nice and interesting. You
> can help the Magna Mater Project if you add the new logo and the
> link to your pagan websites and to those which have nova roman
> subject.
> http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm
>
> VALE BENE,
> IVL SABINVS
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, <annia@...> wrote:
>>
>> Salve,
>>
>> Actually that just seems like a reason why they don't allow rated
> R photos.
>>
>> Vale,
>>
>> Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "iulius sabinus" <iulius_sabinus@...>
>> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
>> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 11:28 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Adding Photos?
>>
>>
>> > SALVE !
>> >
>> > I guess from this reason :
>> > http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/edicts/magisterar-2005-02-
> 27b.html
>> > And I belive is a reasonable one.
>> >
>> > VALE BENE,
>> > IVL SABINVS
>> >
>> > annia@... wrote:
>> > Salve,
>> >
>> > It'd be nice if there was a way you could do it yourself. Why
> doesn't Nova
>> > Roma use a standard php content manager?
>> >
>> > Vale,
>> >
>> > Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Gnaeus Equitius Marinus" <gawne@...>
>> > To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
>> > Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 7:44 PM
>> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Adding Photos?
>> >
>> >
>> >> Salve Gai Livi,
>> >>
>> >> Just send the image file to webmaster AT novaroma DOT org with
> a request
>> >> to have it added to your Album Civium page.
>> >>
>> >> Vale,
>> >>
>> >> -- Marinus
>> >>
>> >> darren_pile wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Salvete,
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi, i'm new to all this and I've got a quick question. How do
> you add
>> >>> a photo to your Nova Roma account?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > SPONSORED LINKS
>> > Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
> Fall of the
>> > roman empire The roman empire
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------
>> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>> >
>> >
>> > Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>> >
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>> > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>> >
>> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > NOVA ROMANI !
>> > Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support
> page to
>> > your websites.
>> > http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm
>> >
>> > "Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius
> Claudius
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------
>> > Yahoo! Mail
>> > Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
>> >
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41727 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
SALVE !

Thank you very much.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

annia@... wrote:
Salve!

Sure no problem. I'll get on that ASAP.

Vale,

Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia





NOVA ROMANI !
Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support page to your websites.
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm

"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------

What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! Autos

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41728 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Salve Annia Minucia,

I honestly don't know. Perhaps M. Octavius Germanicus, who owns the
Nova Roma website, can answer your question.

Vale,

-- Marinus

annia@... wrote:
> Salve,
>
> It'd be nice if there was a way you could do it yourself. Why doesn't Nova
> Roma use a standard php content manager?
>
> Vale,
>
> Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41729 From: darren_pile Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Thanks very much for all your help.

G. Livius Crassus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Annia Minucia,
>
> I honestly don't know. Perhaps M. Octavius Germanicus, who owns
the
> Nova Roma website, can answer your question.
>
> Vale,
>
> -- Marinus
>
> annia@... wrote:
> > Salve,
> >
> > It'd be nice if there was a way you could do it yourself. Why
doesn't Nova
> > Roma use a standard php content manager?
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Annia Minucia-Tiberia Audens Sempronia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41730 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Conduct on the Main List
G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana T. Galeri Paulino omnibusque SPD.

(Long Post)

I thought the following article might be timely and appropriate,
considering that the role of moderators, and poster conduct
on the lists, have recently been the subject of a law put to the
people in November 2758, and the subject of Praetorian Edict V:

> NR ANNNOUNCE Message 830 of 835

> From: "Timothy P. Gallagher"
> Date: Sat Feb 4, 2006 10:15 am
> Subject: Praetorian Edict V

> Praetorian Edict V

> We, the Praetors of Nova Roma, do hereby define the guidelines for
> appropriate usage of Nova Roma's public communication fora. These
> guidelines are based on those previously issued by our predecessors.
> However, as Praetors of Nova Roma, we reserve the right to change
> them at any time. Any corrections or other Forum-related matters
> including complaints should be sent to us at praetors@....
< remainder snipped>

=================================================================

HASTY E-MAILS CAN DO DAMAGE
by Stuart Rudner (Toronto lawyer)

The speed and convenience of e-mail has changed not only the
way in which we communicate, but also the manner in which we
do business.

The immediacy of it has fostered an increasing pressure for
instantaneous response. This sense of urgency and the casual
way in which e-mail tends to be used means messages are sent
without the forethought and review that would accompany more
formal communications.

To varying degrees, e-mail has replaced almost every other form
of communication. Issues that would have been addressed
face-to-face or on the telephone now take place by e-mail.
At the same time, e-mail is used where formal letters or
memos were once written. This can be a dangerous trend;
important messages are fired off in a quick, casual manner
without sufficient consideration of the content or consequences.

The reality is electronic documents such as e-mail messages
are stored and archived, often in a number of places. They are
extremely difficult to delete in an effective manner, and
typically remain retrievable despite efforts to the contrary.
And they are turning up in court proceedigs with increasing
regularity.

Perhaps the best Canadian example is the dispute between
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Genuity Capital Markets,
involving a group of departing CIBC employees. The employees
seem to have been operating under the mistaken belief that
their BlackBerry PIN messages could not be seen by their
employer, and that simply deleting incriminating mssages
would remove all traces. CIBC is now relying on these messages
in its lawsuit.

A few years ago, Merrill Lynch & Co. suffered significant
embarassment when the New York attorney-general's office found
that stocks the firm had publicly rated "buy" were referred to
internally by investment analysts as "junk," "crap," "dog,"
and "disaster." The firm paid $100 million US to avoid possible
criminal charges.

E-mail has not only changed the pace of communication, as
faxing did, it has changed the way we write. People do not take
the time to structure the content of an e-mail message as they
would a letter or memorandum. They do not use proper grammar,
punctuation or spelling. They use slang, abbreviations and
"smileys" to convey their message.

As a result, many communications are sent with a decidedly
unprofessional appearance, which can reflect poorly on the
indidvidual and the organization. For example, what would you
think upon receiving this message from your accountant:
"Ur tax return is ready 4 u 2 sign!!"

Sensitive discussions used to take place in person or by
telephone. Courts were at the mercy of the less-than-reliable
memories of those involved in the conversations. Conversely,
e-mail messages detail exactly what was said, when, by whom
and to whom. Hidden data can reveal even more about the
document's history, including the changes made in the course of
drafting.

It is crucial that people understand two realities: E-mail
messages do not simply disappear from their systems when they
press "send" or "delete," and they are "documents" that can be
produced in related court proceedings and can, therefore be used
against them.

So how can we protect ourselves?

Organizations should encourage employees to adopt a more cautious
approach to the use of e-mail and consider other methods of
communication.

Ideally, sensitive, controversial or confidential information
should not be discussed via e-mail. In those situations, talking
face-to-face or by telephone should be encouraged. Where privacy
concerns exist, other forms of correspondence should be favored.

E-mail mesages should be drafted prudently and professionally.
***The writer should consider the consequences if the message
were to pop up in the newspaper or be read aloud in court. ***
[my emphasis]

E-mail is a useful tool that can make all of us more accessible
and efficient. Like any other tool, however, it must be used
responsibly and judiciously.

Just because you can send a quick e-mail on your BlackBerry in
between meetings doesn't mean you should.

(The Financial Post)
================================================================

Vale, et valete bene in pace Deorum

G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41731 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: An invite to a debate
Salve

I'm writing this message , after a month of almost absolute absence
from this an dother venues, in the hope of sparking a critical debate
on the Status of our organization (association, micronation, however
you want to call it) in what I percieve a moment of, maybe slow, but
steady involution.

As said, it has been a month since I've dealt with Nova Roma matters,
and this time has passed not because of forgetfulness or lazyness on
my part, but rather for a precise decision: to stay away from Nova
Roma for a time to recollect my thoughts and take a deep breath. And
in fact, besides a few sparse emails over the Urbs mailing list and
the tribunician and praetorian cohors ones in answer to specific
inquiries, my detachment from Nova Roma has been full and complete.
Was tryin got get a fair perspecive to things. That's what I came up
with.

Over the last months, I've had this growing feeling of detachment from
the whole Nova Rom aconceptand I will explain you why: I simply don't
think Nova Roma serves any other purpose than its own self preserving,
which is no purpose great enough to devote my not unlimited time and
energies to.

It occurred to me that for defining Nova Roma is generally easier to
say what it is not, than what it is: it is not a nation, it is not an
archeological group, it is not a study group, it is not a pressure or
lobbying group for heritage or archeological preservation, it is not a
religious group, it is not a discussion group, it is not a role
playing game.

Peraphs, what describes better Nova Roma as it is now is a virtual
community which only practical purpose is having a yearly and
convoluted and extremely complex election of its own moderators (in a
broad meaning of the word), while having mostly discussions in the in
between intervals to give the impression we are actually doing
something. Yes, there is the occasional "academic" discussion (usually
monopolized by one or two individuals gifted with an unusual excess of
time, words and sense of self-importance), but all in all it seems to
me they are the exceptions, rather than the rule.

I think, Nova Roma, if ever had it, lost its way. I'm not even being
extremely original in saying this, as many have said that before me,
and probably other will do after me. If the purpose was really
creating one day a RL nation, i think by now we all know how
ridiculous the thing is.

If it was to revive the Religio Romana, I think it not only didn't add
much to the general worldwide pagan revival movement (said without
offense, I just can't find a better term to define it), but generally
the whole subject has substantially fallen in the background in the
every day Nova Roma life.

The developement towards a RL association that had started to take
place a couple of years ago, at least in Europe,and that I had looked
upon with great favor has substantially aborted (sometimes taken over
by parallel national projects towards which I have mixed feelings).

With the exception of Madrid and Rome, I've heard of no other RL
community being created, and of those two, at least Rome (maybe my
fault in this, I do not know) is struggling. The yearly European
conventa are indeed a funny way to spend a week, but they do not
rapresent, in my opinion, anything more than a peculiar way to spend a
summer week. It's true I've mostly been absent from those, but I've
not seen anything practical, not even a vague project, coming out from
those, anything that would help creating a feeling of being part of
something going anywhere rather than a more or less numerous group of
individuals sharing a more or less vague sense of fascination from a
2000 years old reality. As a Tribunus, I subscribed to all the
european and several non-european provincial mailing lists and with
the exception of Spain (who I think it's slowing down too, but that's
just a perception) and Italy, they seem pretty much comatose as well.

The practical projects on the field remained projects: even the MM
project, as I can percieve it, has basically stalled, and no other
project has been brought forward. Obviously, we do not have the
economical resources, and I do not see a way to gather them, to do
anything really practical. Serapio had the brilliant, indeed
brilliant, idea of the literary contest, but that also seemed more
like the occasional lightning in an otherwise darkly clouded night.

In my year as a Tribunus I've learned that 90% of the energies of the
(not quite surprisingly less and less) active members are spent in
drafting elaborate and substantially void of any practical RL effect
laws, edicts and whatever, arguing about susch intellectual creatures,
discussing about what this or that person as done or hasn't done (but
more correctly, said or not said, as most have lost the perception of
the difference of DOING and SAYING, and actually equating having
written a mail as actually having DONE something).

If Nova Roma would be disbanded today, all that would be left is an
archive of several thousands of emails, a Tabularium with several
hundreds of laws and edicts ruling a community of a couple of hundreds
of active people and what else? And do you see this changing in the
next year or two? I do not.

The truth is that for every single possible function of Nova Roma
there are other, better, alternatives: letting aside the utopistic
micronational project, for the Religio (which, incidentally, seems to
be more of an individual rytes thing than anything else, probably
because it's practically impossible to celebrate the great public
celebrations) there are many smaller, local, but RL "circles" (again,
said without offense). For re-constructionism, many more organized and
rl group (that Nova Roma "sponsors", which practically means "oh, we
want to let you know that we think you are so cool"), for academic
discussions, better rl and online venues.

What's our original or specific trait? And most especially, what do we
want to achieve? Untill we do no thave a list, possibly in a
hierachical graduation, of at least potentially achievable goals, we
shall nevr know in which direction we must move. Right now our goals
are vague, general, some of them utopistic, so much that if you'd ask
to 10 nova roman what is nova roma about, i think you'd get at least
8, if not 10, different answers. Some might consider this as a good
thing, a show of vitality and difference, I think that's a show of
confusion an lack of direction which essentially leave us with nowhere
to go and bring us to be stuck in an infinite talk about our
"institutions" and "laws" and little more.

We have 200 more or less active members, and probably about (more, if
we count the senate) 50 of them are busy, in various degrees
(magistrates, scribae, cohortes, consultants and so on and so forth),
in "governing" the others. Not even the most bureocratic nation of all
time had 1 governing person for every 3 governed. The "governing"
activity is sucking up almost all the energies, thoughts, time of the
association (it's enough to check the last 3 months of posts on the
mailing list.. I'd say that 80% to 90% of the post are "legislative"
and "governing" matters and comments about those), and that, long from
being considered pathological, has became so normal that a debate of
what is Nova Roma, what is its purpose, "where it is going and how to
go there" debate has disappeared totally after the last, weak,
appearance of maybe a couple of years ago.

We apparently forgot that governing is not a goal, but a mean to DO
something.. running a country, in case of nations, or achieving the
original or intervened objectives, for an association. But what are
our practical objectives at this point?

Valete,

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis MMDCCLVIII a. U. c.
Aedilis Urbis Iterum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41732 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: An invite to a debate
M. Lucretius Agricola Domitio Constantino Fusco S.P.D.

It is good to see you back, and bringing us such a weighty topic too!

I'm not in a position to "answer" your well-thought-out points in a
systematic way, but I'll just give you a few impressions that I have now.

I think it may be a mistake to ask "What is Nova Roma"? It is easy, as
you showed, to exclude things it is not, but I'll suggest that the
reason is not that Nova Roma is nothing, but that Nova Roma is too
many things. If we ask "What is England?" or "What is Japan?" we'll
run into the same problems. In the end we might have to say "Japan is
the place where Japanese people live." This is a non-answer because it
lacks specificity, but it points to a truth that countries exist, in a
way, because of the people that live in them.

Is Nova Roma the place where Nova Roma citizens live? That looks too
much like a philosophical question to me, and I think I would like to
avoid it. But now I'll ask myself if I have a "life" inside the Res
Publica of Nova Roma. How would I know? If doing things, learning
things and having human relations is living, then I'll say that I have
a life inside Nova Roma. I might not "live" there in exactly the same
way that I live in Nishinomiya, Japan, but it is a life nevertheless.
And it is one that I couldn't live anywhere else.

Maybe you'll say that it is just a state of mind. Then my answer would
be that you've answered your own question.


Another thought I'll share is that in my opinion a problem that we
have is that so much of the life of Nova Roma happens OFF of this
list. This is good, of course, but it means that there is no vantage
point from which we can survey the whole country. This is just a point
of view problem that we have to live with.

About the population, maybe we've removed lots of inactive names from
the rolls, but it seems to me that the quality of people coming in is
higher than ever. I see new people jumping in and doing great things.
I can also feel that in the few years since I entered the Res Publica
that the culture has developed as well.

So I think I'll not worry too much about what Nova Roma is. I'm just
glad that it is. And I'll look forward to seeing you at the Conventus
later this year.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41733 From: Robert Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: An invite to a debate
---Salve,Sir I must tell you I feel your post to be a very sad and
depressing one.In fact I as a new person in this group, you seem to
be trying to discourage and turn away any one who may express pride
in and enthusiasm for Nova Roma.You offer no positve alternatives to
the bkeak and dreary pall you cast upon our Nation.You do not seem to
offer up much but drab inuendo.I for one with such short time within
the ranks take great pride in my Gens and the valued citizenship of
Nova Roma.You say all these hurtful things but offer nothing to
improve what you claim to be so terribly wrong with us.Roma Dies you
even lash out at our Religeon.I thought that someone in your supposed
position was obliged to show more respect than that.Until you can
find a more constuctive and respectful tone when putting down our
people than there can be no debate.Salvete,May the Gods enlighten you!
Appius Galerius Aurelianus,Semper Fidelis. In Nova-
Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus <dom.con.fus@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve
>
> I'm writing this message , after a month of almost absolute absence
> from this an dother venues, in the hope of sparking a critical
debate
> on the Status of our organization (association, micronation, however
> you want to call it) in what I percieve a moment of, maybe slow, but
> steady involution.
>
> As said, it has been a month since I've dealt with Nova Roma
matters,
> and this time has passed not because of forgetfulness or lazyness on
> my part, but rather for a precise decision: to stay away from Nova
> Roma for a time to recollect my thoughts and take a deep breath. And
> in fact, besides a few sparse emails over the Urbs mailing list and
> the tribunician and praetorian cohors ones in answer to specific
> inquiries, my detachment from Nova Roma has been full and complete.
> Was tryin got get a fair perspecive to things. That's what I came up
> with.
>
> Over the last months, I've had this growing feeling of detachment
from
> the whole Nova Rom aconceptand I will explain you why: I simply
don't
> think Nova Roma serves any other purpose than its own self
preserving,
> which is no purpose great enough to devote my not unlimited time and
> energies to.
>
> It occurred to me that for defining Nova Roma is generally easier to
> say what it is not, than what it is: it is not a nation, it is not
an
> archeological group, it is not a study group, it is not a pressure
or
> lobbying group for heritage or archeological preservation, it is
not a
> religious group, it is not a discussion group, it is not a role
> playing game.
>
> Peraphs, what describes better Nova Roma as it is now is a virtual
> community which only practical purpose is having a yearly and
> convoluted and extremely complex election of its own moderators (in
a
> broad meaning of the word), while having mostly discussions in the
in
> between intervals to give the impression we are actually doing
> something. Yes, there is the occasional "academic" discussion
(usually
> monopolized by one or two individuals gifted with an unusual excess
of
> time, words and sense of self-importance), but all in all it seems
to
> me they are the exceptions, rather than the rule.
>
> I think, Nova Roma, if ever had it, lost its way. I'm not even being
> extremely original in saying this, as many have said that before me,
> and probably other will do after me. If the purpose was really
> creating one day a RL nation, i think by now we all know how
> ridiculous the thing is.
>
> If it was to revive the Religio Romana, I think it not only didn't
add
> much to the general worldwide pagan revival movement (said without
> offense, I just can't find a better term to define it), but
generally
> the whole subject has substantially fallen in the background in the
> every day Nova Roma life.
>
> The developement towards a RL association that had started to take
> place a couple of years ago, at least in Europe,and that I had
looked
> upon with great favor has substantially aborted (sometimes taken
over
> by parallel national projects towards which I have mixed feelings).
>
> With the exception of Madrid and Rome, I've heard of no other RL
> community being created, and of those two, at least Rome (maybe my
> fault in this, I do not know) is struggling. The yearly European
> conventa are indeed a funny way to spend a week, but they do not
> rapresent, in my opinion, anything more than a peculiar way to
spend a
> summer week. It's true I've mostly been absent from those, but I've
> not seen anything practical, not even a vague project, coming out
from
> those, anything that would help creating a feeling of being part of
> something going anywhere rather than a more or less numerous group
of
> individuals sharing a more or less vague sense of fascination from a
> 2000 years old reality. As a Tribunus, I subscribed to all the
> european and several non-european provincial mailing lists and with
> the exception of Spain (who I think it's slowing down too, but
that's
> just a perception) and Italy, they seem pretty much comatose as
well.
>
> The practical projects on the field remained projects: even the MM
> project, as I can percieve it, has basically stalled, and no other
> project has been brought forward. Obviously, we do not have the
> economical resources, and I do not see a way to gather them, to do
> anything really practical. Serapio had the brilliant, indeed
> brilliant, idea of the literary contest, but that also seemed more
> like the occasional lightning in an otherwise darkly clouded night.
>
> In my year as a Tribunus I've learned that 90% of the energies of
the
> (not quite surprisingly less and less) active members are spent in
> drafting elaborate and substantially void of any practical RL
effect
> laws, edicts and whatever, arguing about susch intellectual
creatures,
> discussing about what this or that person as done or hasn't done
(but
> more correctly, said or not said, as most have lost the perception
of
> the difference of DOING and SAYING, and actually equating having
> written a mail as actually having DONE something).
>
> If Nova Roma would be disbanded today, all that would be left is an
> archive of several thousands of emails, a Tabularium with several
> hundreds of laws and edicts ruling a community of a couple of
hundreds
> of active people and what else? And do you see this changing in the
> next year or two? I do not.
>
> The truth is that for every single possible function of Nova Roma
> there are other, better, alternatives: letting aside the utopistic
> micronational project, for the Religio (which, incidentally, seems
to
> be more of an individual rytes thing than anything else, probably
> because it's practically impossible to celebrate the great public
> celebrations) there are many smaller, local, but RL "circles"
(again,
> said without offense). For re-constructionism, many more organized
and
> rl group (that Nova Roma "sponsors", which practically means "oh, we
> want to let you know that we think you are so cool"), for academic
> discussions, better rl and online venues.
>
> What's our original or specific trait? And most especially, what do
we
> want to achieve? Untill we do no thave a list, possibly in a
> hierachical graduation, of at least potentially achievable goals, we
> shall nevr know in which direction we must move. Right now our goals
> are vague, general, some of them utopistic, so much that if you'd
ask
> to 10 nova roman what is nova roma about, i think you'd get at least
> 8, if not 10, different answers. Some might consider this as a good
> thing, a show of vitality and difference, I think that's a show of
> confusion an lack of direction which essentially leave us with
nowhere
> to go and bring us to be stuck in an infinite talk about our
> "institutions" and "laws" and little more.
>
> We have 200 more or less active members, and probably about (more,
if
> we count the senate) 50 of them are busy, in various degrees
> (magistrates, scribae, cohortes, consultants and so on and so
forth),
> in "governing" the others. Not even the most bureocratic nation of
all
> time had 1 governing person for every 3 governed. The "governing"
> activity is sucking up almost all the energies, thoughts, time of
the
> association (it's enough to check the last 3 months of posts on the
> mailing list.. I'd say that 80% to 90% of the post are "legislative"
> and "governing" matters and comments about those), and that, long
from
> being considered pathological, has became so normal that a debate of
> what is Nova Roma, what is its purpose, "where it is going and how
to
> go there" debate has disappeared totally after the last, weak,
> appearance of maybe a couple of years ago.
>
> We apparently forgot that governing is not a goal, but a mean to DO
> something.. running a country, in case of nations, or achieving the
> original or intervened objectives, for an association. But what are
> our practical objectives at this point?
>
> Valete,
>
> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
>
> Founder of Gens Constantinia
> Tribunus Plebis MMDCCLVIII a. U. c.
> Aedilis Urbis Iterum
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41734 From: marcellus95 Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Regarding Taxes....
Salve all, just paid my taxes through Pay-Pal for the first time since
I join this group. Anyway i would like to ask how would Nova Roma do
with the taxes collected, and will it improve my social status
(currently a Capita Censi?
Thanks
Lucius Augusta Marcellus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41735 From: darren_pile Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: An invite to a debate
Salvete all,

As a new citizen of Nova Roma, perhaps I'm not in the best position
to cast an opinion - but I will anyway!

In a way I agree with Domitius Constantinus Fuscus; there are an
astonishing number of edicts and laws for such a small number of
people living in virtually a virtual world. One must be careful that
all we achieve is not a huge list of laws!

On the other hand, Nova Roma has one of the most informative and
fascinating websites on the entire internet, along with a vibrant
community with active members.

But what are the goals of Nova Roma exactly? What has been done to
further these aims? If the goal is to inform and educate then this
is well established through the website. If the aims are to create a
community in which people feel that they belong then I would say
that this has also been established with the gens and province
system.

Is the long term goal to actually create a viable nation state in a
modern yet traditional form of ancient Rome? How are the Senate and
people of Nova Roma working towards this goal? How is Nova Roma
being promoted and advertised? How are we to fund this?

If every magistrate becomes a life time member of the Senate, then
(because of the small number of people involved in Nova Roma at
present), are we going to end up with an enormously large Senate
making thousands of laws for only a tiny number of people to follow?
Perhaps a way around is to only be allowed a Senatorial position for
a period of a few years, after which one has to run for an office
again.

I live in England and our local governments (the councils) are
notorious for being money pits filled with thousands of little
Hitlers (Neros!?) making life as difficult as possible for the
people. Will Nova Roma become like this?

Please don't think this is a moan, Nova Roma is a fantastic place.
If its goals are to inform and educate people about Ancient Rome and
the Religio Romana and provide a place for people to meet and
discuss views, then this has happened and is continuing to happen.

Gaius Livinus Crassus.




- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert" <centorious@...> wrote:
>
> ---Salve,Sir I must tell you I feel your post to be a very sad and
> depressing one.In fact I as a new person in this group, you seem
to
> be trying to discourage and turn away any one who may express
pride
> in and enthusiasm for Nova Roma.You offer no positve alternatives
to
> the bkeak and dreary pall you cast upon our Nation.You do not seem
to
> offer up much but drab inuendo.I for one with such short time
within
> the ranks take great pride in my Gens and the valued citizenship
of
> Nova Roma.You say all these hurtful things but offer nothing to
> improve what you claim to be so terribly wrong with us.Roma Dies
you
> even lash out at our Religeon.I thought that someone in your
supposed
> position was obliged to show more respect than that.Until you can
> find a more constuctive and respectful tone when putting down our
> people than there can be no debate.Salvete,May the Gods enlighten
you!
> Appius Galerius Aurelianus,Semper Fidelis. In Nova-
> Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus <dom.con.fus@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Salve
> >
> > I'm writing this message , after a month of almost absolute
absence
> > from this an dother venues, in the hope of sparking a critical
> debate
> > on the Status of our organization (association, micronation,
however
> > you want to call it) in what I percieve a moment of, maybe slow,
but
> > steady involution.
> >
> > As said, it has been a month since I've dealt with Nova Roma
> matters,
> > and this time has passed not because of forgetfulness or
lazyness on
> > my part, but rather for a precise decision: to stay away from
Nova
> > Roma for a time to recollect my thoughts and take a deep breath.
And
> > in fact, besides a few sparse emails over the Urbs mailing list
and
> > the tribunician and praetorian cohors ones in answer to specific
> > inquiries, my detachment from Nova Roma has been full and
complete.
> > Was tryin got get a fair perspecive to things. That's what I
came up
> > with.
> >
> > Over the last months, I've had this growing feeling of
detachment
> from
> > the whole Nova Rom aconceptand I will explain you why: I simply
> don't
> > think Nova Roma serves any other purpose than its own self
> preserving,
> > which is no purpose great enough to devote my not unlimited time
and
> > energies to.
> >
> > It occurred to me that for defining Nova Roma is generally
easier to
> > say what it is not, than what it is: it is not a nation, it is
not
> an
> > archeological group, it is not a study group, it is not a
pressure
> or
> > lobbying group for heritage or archeological preservation, it is
> not a
> > religious group, it is not a discussion group, it is not a role
> > playing game.
> >
> > Peraphs, what describes better Nova Roma as it is now is a
virtual
> > community which only practical purpose is having a yearly and
> > convoluted and extremely complex election of its own moderators
(in
> a
> > broad meaning of the word), while having mostly discussions in
the
> in
> > between intervals to give the impression we are actually doing
> > something. Yes, there is the occasional "academic" discussion
> (usually
> > monopolized by one or two individuals gifted with an unusual
excess
> of
> > time, words and sense of self-importance), but all in all it
seems
> to
> > me they are the exceptions, rather than the rule.
> >
> > I think, Nova Roma, if ever had it, lost its way. I'm not even
being
> > extremely original in saying this, as many have said that before
me,
> > and probably other will do after me. If the purpose was really
> > creating one day a RL nation, i think by now we all know how
> > ridiculous the thing is.
> >
> > If it was to revive the Religio Romana, I think it not only
didn't
> add
> > much to the general worldwide pagan revival movement (said
without
> > offense, I just can't find a better term to define it), but
> generally
> > the whole subject has substantially fallen in the background in
the
> > every day Nova Roma life.
> >
> > The developement towards a RL association that had started to
take
> > place a couple of years ago, at least in Europe,and that I had
> looked
> > upon with great favor has substantially aborted (sometimes taken
> over
> > by parallel national projects towards which I have mixed
feelings).
> >
> > With the exception of Madrid and Rome, I've heard of no other RL
> > community being created, and of those two, at least Rome (maybe
my
> > fault in this, I do not know) is struggling. The yearly European
> > conventa are indeed a funny way to spend a week, but they do not
> > rapresent, in my opinion, anything more than a peculiar way to
> spend a
> > summer week. It's true I've mostly been absent from those, but
I've
> > not seen anything practical, not even a vague project, coming
out
> from
> > those, anything that would help creating a feeling of being part
of
> > something going anywhere rather than a more or less numerous
group
> of
> > individuals sharing a more or less vague sense of fascination
from a
> > 2000 years old reality. As a Tribunus, I subscribed to all the
> > european and several non-european provincial mailing lists and
with
> > the exception of Spain (who I think it's slowing down too, but
> that's
> > just a perception) and Italy, they seem pretty much comatose as
> well.
> >
> > The practical projects on the field remained projects: even the
MM
> > project, as I can percieve it, has basically stalled, and no
other
> > project has been brought forward. Obviously, we do not have the
> > economical resources, and I do not see a way to gather them, to
do
> > anything really practical. Serapio had the brilliant, indeed
> > brilliant, idea of the literary contest, but that also seemed
more
> > like the occasional lightning in an otherwise darkly clouded
night.
> >
> > In my year as a Tribunus I've learned that 90% of the energies
of
> the
> > (not quite surprisingly less and less) active members are spent
in
> > drafting elaborate and substantially void of any practical RL
> effect
> > laws, edicts and whatever, arguing about susch intellectual
> creatures,
> > discussing about what this or that person as done or hasn't done
> (but
> > more correctly, said or not said, as most have lost the
perception
> of
> > the difference of DOING and SAYING, and actually equating having
> > written a mail as actually having DONE something).
> >
> > If Nova Roma would be disbanded today, all that would be left is
an
> > archive of several thousands of emails, a Tabularium with several
> > hundreds of laws and edicts ruling a community of a couple of
> hundreds
> > of active people and what else? And do you see this changing in
the
> > next year or two? I do not.
> >
> > The truth is that for every single possible function of Nova Roma
> > there are other, better, alternatives: letting aside the
utopistic
> > micronational project, for the Religio (which, incidentally,
seems
> to
> > be more of an individual rytes thing than anything else, probably
> > because it's practically impossible to celebrate the great public
> > celebrations) there are many smaller, local, but RL "circles"
> (again,
> > said without offense). For re-constructionism, many more
organized
> and
> > rl group (that Nova Roma "sponsors", which practically
means "oh, we
> > want to let you know that we think you are so cool"), for
academic
> > discussions, better rl and online venues.
> >
> > What's our original or specific trait? And most especially, what
do
> we
> > want to achieve? Untill we do no thave a list, possibly in a
> > hierachical graduation, of at least potentially achievable
goals, we
> > shall nevr know in which direction we must move. Right now our
goals
> > are vague, general, some of them utopistic, so much that if
you'd
> ask
> > to 10 nova roman what is nova roma about, i think you'd get at
least
> > 8, if not 10, different answers. Some might consider this as a
good
> > thing, a show of vitality and difference, I think that's a show
of
> > confusion an lack of direction which essentially leave us with
> nowhere
> > to go and bring us to be stuck in an infinite talk about our
> > "institutions" and "laws" and little more.
> >
> > We have 200 more or less active members, and probably about
(more,
> if
> > we count the senate) 50 of them are busy, in various degrees
> > (magistrates, scribae, cohortes, consultants and so on and so
> forth),
> > in "governing" the others. Not even the most bureocratic nation
of
> all
> > time had 1 governing person for every 3 governed. The "governing"
> > activity is sucking up almost all the energies, thoughts, time
of
> the
> > association (it's enough to check the last 3 months of posts on
the
> > mailing list.. I'd say that 80% to 90% of the post
are "legislative"
> > and "governing" matters and comments about those), and that,
long
> from
> > being considered pathological, has became so normal that a
debate of
> > what is Nova Roma, what is its purpose, "where it is going and
how
> to
> > go there" debate has disappeared totally after the last, weak,
> > appearance of maybe a couple of years ago.
> >
> > We apparently forgot that governing is not a goal, but a mean to
DO
> > something.. running a country, in case of nations, or achieving
the
> > original or intervened objectives, for an association. But what
are
> > our practical objectives at this point?
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
> >
> > Founder of Gens Constantinia
> > Tribunus Plebis MMDCCLVIII a. U. c.
> > Aedilis Urbis Iterum
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41736 From: darren_pile Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: An invite to a debate
Salvete,

Perhaps it may be wise for the Senate (in its upcoming meeting) to
reaffirm the goals of Nova Roma along with some sort of action plan
as to how these goals are to be met.

A Roman 5 year plan maybe??!!

G. Livius Crassus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert" <centorious@...> wrote:
>
> ---Salve,Sir I must tell you I feel your post to be a very sad and
> depressing one.In fact I as a new person in this group, you seem
to
> be trying to discourage and turn away any one who may express
pride
> in and enthusiasm for Nova Roma.You offer no positve alternatives
to
> the bkeak and dreary pall you cast upon our Nation.You do not seem
to
> offer up much but drab inuendo.I for one with such short time
within
> the ranks take great pride in my Gens and the valued citizenship
of
> Nova Roma.You say all these hurtful things but offer nothing to
> improve what you claim to be so terribly wrong with us.Roma Dies
you
> even lash out at our Religeon.I thought that someone in your
supposed
> position was obliged to show more respect than that.Until you can
> find a more constuctive and respectful tone when putting down our
> people than there can be no debate.Salvete,May the Gods enlighten
you!
> Appius Galerius Aurelianus,Semper Fidelis. In Nova-
> Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus <dom.con.fus@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Salve
> >
> > I'm writing this message , after a month of almost absolute
absence
> > from this an dother venues, in the hope of sparking a critical
> debate
> > on the Status of our organization (association, micronation,
however
> > you want to call it) in what I percieve a moment of, maybe slow,
but
> > steady involution.
> >
> > As said, it has been a month since I've dealt with Nova Roma
> matters,
> > and this time has passed not because of forgetfulness or
lazyness on
> > my part, but rather for a precise decision: to stay away from
Nova
> > Roma for a time to recollect my thoughts and take a deep breath.
And
> > in fact, besides a few sparse emails over the Urbs mailing list
and
> > the tribunician and praetorian cohors ones in answer to specific
> > inquiries, my detachment from Nova Roma has been full and
complete.
> > Was tryin got get a fair perspecive to things. That's what I
came up
> > with.
> >
> > Over the last months, I've had this growing feeling of
detachment
> from
> > the whole Nova Rom aconceptand I will explain you why: I simply
> don't
> > think Nova Roma serves any other purpose than its own self
> preserving,
> > which is no purpose great enough to devote my not unlimited time
and
> > energies to.
> >
> > It occurred to me that for defining Nova Roma is generally
easier to
> > say what it is not, than what it is: it is not a nation, it is
not
> an
> > archeological group, it is not a study group, it is not a
pressure
> or
> > lobbying group for heritage or archeological preservation, it is
> not a
> > religious group, it is not a discussion group, it is not a role
> > playing game.
> >
> > Peraphs, what describes better Nova Roma as it is now is a
virtual
> > community which only practical purpose is having a yearly and
> > convoluted and extremely complex election of its own moderators
(in
> a
> > broad meaning of the word), while having mostly discussions in
the
> in
> > between intervals to give the impression we are actually doing
> > something. Yes, there is the occasional "academic" discussion
> (usually
> > monopolized by one or two individuals gifted with an unusual
excess
> of
> > time, words and sense of self-importance), but all in all it
seems
> to
> > me they are the exceptions, rather than the rule.
> >
> > I think, Nova Roma, if ever had it, lost its way. I'm not even
being
> > extremely original in saying this, as many have said that before
me,
> > and probably other will do after me. If the purpose was really
> > creating one day a RL nation, i think by now we all know how
> > ridiculous the thing is.
> >
> > If it was to revive the Religio Romana, I think it not only
didn't
> add
> > much to the general worldwide pagan revival movement (said
without
> > offense, I just can't find a better term to define it), but
> generally
> > the whole subject has substantially fallen in the background in
the
> > every day Nova Roma life.
> >
> > The developement towards a RL association that had started to
take
> > place a couple of years ago, at least in Europe,and that I had
> looked
> > upon with great favor has substantially aborted (sometimes taken
> over
> > by parallel national projects towards which I have mixed
feelings).
> >
> > With the exception of Madrid and Rome, I've heard of no other RL
> > community being created, and of those two, at least Rome (maybe
my
> > fault in this, I do not know) is struggling. The yearly European
> > conventa are indeed a funny way to spend a week, but they do not
> > rapresent, in my opinion, anything more than a peculiar way to
> spend a
> > summer week. It's true I've mostly been absent from those, but
I've
> > not seen anything practical, not even a vague project, coming
out
> from
> > those, anything that would help creating a feeling of being part
of
> > something going anywhere rather than a more or less numerous
group
> of
> > individuals sharing a more or less vague sense of fascination
from a
> > 2000 years old reality. As a Tribunus, I subscribed to all the
> > european and several non-european provincial mailing lists and
with
> > the exception of Spain (who I think it's slowing down too, but
> that's
> > just a perception) and Italy, they seem pretty much comatose as
> well.
> >
> > The practical projects on the field remained projects: even the
MM
> > project, as I can percieve it, has basically stalled, and no
other
> > project has been brought forward. Obviously, we do not have the
> > economical resources, and I do not see a way to gather them, to
do
> > anything really practical. Serapio had the brilliant, indeed
> > brilliant, idea of the literary contest, but that also seemed
more
> > like the occasional lightning in an otherwise darkly clouded
night.
> >
> > In my year as a Tribunus I've learned that 90% of the energies
of
> the
> > (not quite surprisingly less and less) active members are spent
in
> > drafting elaborate and substantially void of any practical RL
> effect
> > laws, edicts and whatever, arguing about susch intellectual
> creatures,
> > discussing about what this or that person as done or hasn't done
> (but
> > more correctly, said or not said, as most have lost the
perception
> of
> > the difference of DOING and SAYING, and actually equating having
> > written a mail as actually having DONE something).
> >
> > If Nova Roma would be disbanded today, all that would be left is
an
> > archive of several thousands of emails, a Tabularium with several
> > hundreds of laws and edicts ruling a community of a couple of
> hundreds
> > of active people and what else? And do you see this changing in
the
> > next year or two? I do not.
> >
> > The truth is that for every single possible function of Nova Roma
> > there are other, better, alternatives: letting aside the
utopistic
> > micronational project, for the Religio (which, incidentally,
seems
> to
> > be more of an individual rytes thing than anything else, probably
> > because it's practically impossible to celebrate the great public
> > celebrations) there are many smaller, local, but RL "circles"
> (again,
> > said without offense). For re-constructionism, many more
organized
> and
> > rl group (that Nova Roma "sponsors", which practically
means "oh, we
> > want to let you know that we think you are so cool"), for
academic
> > discussions, better rl and online venues.
> >
> > What's our original or specific trait? And most especially, what
do
> we
> > want to achieve? Untill we do no thave a list, possibly in a
> > hierachical graduation, of at least potentially achievable
goals, we
> > shall nevr know in which direction we must move. Right now our
goals
> > are vague, general, some of them utopistic, so much that if
you'd
> ask
> > to 10 nova roman what is nova roma about, i think you'd get at
least
> > 8, if not 10, different answers. Some might consider this as a
good
> > thing, a show of vitality and difference, I think that's a show
of
> > confusion an lack of direction which essentially leave us with
> nowhere
> > to go and bring us to be stuck in an infinite talk about our
> > "institutions" and "laws" and little more.
> >
> > We have 200 more or less active members, and probably about
(more,
> if
> > we count the senate) 50 of them are busy, in various degrees
> > (magistrates, scribae, cohortes, consultants and so on and so
> forth),
> > in "governing" the others. Not even the most bureocratic nation
of
> all
> > time had 1 governing person for every 3 governed. The "governing"
> > activity is sucking up almost all the energies, thoughts, time
of
> the
> > association (it's enough to check the last 3 months of posts on
the
> > mailing list.. I'd say that 80% to 90% of the post
are "legislative"
> > and "governing" matters and comments about those), and that,
long
> from
> > being considered pathological, has became so normal that a
debate of
> > what is Nova Roma, what is its purpose, "where it is going and
how
> to
> > go there" debate has disappeared totally after the last, weak,
> > appearance of maybe a couple of years ago.
> >
> > We apparently forgot that governing is not a goal, but a mean to
DO
> > something.. running a country, in case of nations, or achieving
the
> > original or intervened objectives, for an association. But what
are
> > our practical objectives at this point?
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
> >
> > Founder of Gens Constantinia
> > Tribunus Plebis MMDCCLVIII a. U. c.
> > Aedilis Urbis Iterum
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41737 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: An invite to a debate
Salve Crasse, et salvete quirites,

G. Livius Crassus wrote:

> Perhaps it may be wise for the Senate (in its upcoming meeting) to
> reaffirm the goals of Nova Roma along with some sort of action plan
> as to how these goals are to be met.

Consul G. Fabius Buteo Modianus, who was just elected at the end of
December, ran on a platform of carring out the goals that I placed
before the Senate (and the Senate ratified) back during my consular year
two years ago. I'm looking forward to seeing his action plan too.

Vale, et valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41738 From: FAC Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: New website for PROVINCIA ITALIA
Salvete Omnes,

the Provincia Italia have a new website at

http://italia.novaroma.org

Here you'll find information about the provincial administration, a
short vademecum about Nova roma in italian, articles about the roman
history of this Land and its most important roman men. And again
military, religious and cultural details.
Currently the website is in italian and we're accomplishing the
pinacotheca.

P.S.: I would recall to the Consules and the Illustri Senatores that
the title "Provincia" applied to Italia is a terrible historical
error. Rome never called Italy (the mother land) easily "Provincia".
Maybe we could discuss about it.

Valete
Franciscus Apulus Caesar
Senator et ProConsul Italiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41739 From: Marcus Audens Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: "Roman Times / Pilum" Quarterlies
Ladies and Gentlemen;

As you may or may not know, the previously elected Editor Commentarium "Aquila" has resigned. I have placed this situation in the hands of the Consuls for their resolving, making my recommendations as Editor Commentarium Senioris.

That being in the decision stage, I wanted to let you know that the "Roman Times" and "Pilum" Quarterlies will be coming out at the end of March. These are quarterly newsletters which is part of my responsibility as the above Senate selected Magistrate. So, if anyone has an article, poem, announcement or any other suitable material for these two quarterlies, I invite you to submit them to me at the following E-Mail address:

jmath669642reng@...

The "Roman Times" is a newsletter which is a general newsletter with no particular emphasis. "Pilum" is of, course, a newsletter devoted to the military aspects of the Roman World. A third newsletter "Nova Britannia" is also planned for those who live in, have lived in, wish to write about, or live close by the Provincia of Nova Britannia, will also be published.

The date deadline for the articles for all three newsletters is March 15. 2006. The material should be in a plain format, and the length is up to you. One to Two pages of material is standard, but if you wish to write more we will simply serialize the article and the remainder will appear in the next issue, or if there is room, we will produce the whole article.

Material subject is up to you, of course. I find that political comments and materials are usually out of date before the quarterly is published, and religious material is reviewed by one of the Pontiffs for suitability (I am not a religious expert!!!)

I hope that some of you who wish to see their efforts in print will take advantage of these quarterlies. They are for the citizens of Nova Roma, and some effort has been taken to insure that these are provided free of charge, and on the internet.

My thanks for your very kind consideration of this message.

Respectfully;

Marcus Minucius Audens

Editor Commentarium Senioris





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41740 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: An invite to a debate
Salve Tribvnvs Domitivs Constantinvs Fvscvs!

I'm a new member in Nova Roma and I dont even have a full citizenship yet but I would like to comment some things you said.
About the laws, I do admit that I'm not yet an expert at the matter in question, so I leave a discussion for those who are more informed.
However I got sad to find out that one in your position is so frustrated with our group. You weren't able to define what is Nova Roma. I sincerely think that the question in itself is completely absurd. What was exactly Ancient Rome? Can you define that? If you can, I would like you to share with us that highly elevated definition.
I'm a finnish citizen and I'm proud of that, I live in province of Hispania and I'm proud of that too. To be a member of Nova Roma makes me feel ROMAN and I'm VERY proud of that!!! Maybe in your opinion I'm suffering from some kind of identity crise but at least I live an interesting life, instead of falling into a boring daily routine of the "real world".
You say that Nova Roma is going nowhere. Well, what did you expect when you joined in? To change the world? For that you would need hundreds of legions my friend. As far as I'm concerned, I take part in the group which at least has many educative goals. We share a love which is Rome and we can go as far as we want as long as members have positive alternatives. Critics which are not constructive won't serve for anything!
At last: Rome was not built in a day!!! I would like you to remember that.
Respectfully yours,
Gaivs Cassivs Piso.
Vale!
Domitius Constantinus Fuscus <dom.con.fus@...> escreveu:
Salve

I'm writing this message , after a month of almost absolute absence
from this an dother venues, in the hope of sparking a critical debate
on the Status of our organization (association, micronation, however
you want to call it) in what I percieve a moment of, maybe slow, but
steady involution.

As said, it has been a month since I've dealt with Nova Roma matters,
and this time has passed not because of forgetfulness or lazyness on
my part, but rather for a precise decision: to stay away from Nova
Roma for a time to recollect my thoughts and take a deep breath. And
in fact, besides a few sparse emails over the Urbs mailing list and
the tribunician and praetorian cohors ones in answer to specific
inquiries, my detachment from Nova Roma has been full and complete.
Was tryin got get a fair perspecive to things. That's what I came up
with.

Over the last months, I've had this growing feeling of detachment from
the whole Nova Rom aconceptand I will explain you why: I simply don't
think Nova Roma serves any other purpose than its own self preserving,
which is no purpose great enough to devote my not unlimited time and
energies to.

It occurred to me that for defining Nova Roma is generally easier to
say what it is not, than what it is: it is not a nation, it is not an
archeological group, it is not a study group, it is not a pressure or
lobbying group for heritage or archeological preservation, it is not a
religious group, it is not a discussion group, it is not a role
playing game.

Peraphs, what describes better Nova Roma as it is now is a virtual
community which only practical purpose is having a yearly and
convoluted and extremely complex election of its own moderators (in a
broad meaning of the word), while having mostly discussions in the in
between intervals to give the impression we are actually doing
something. Yes, there is the occasional "academic" discussion (usually
monopolized by one or two individuals gifted with an unusual excess of
time, words and sense of self-importance), but all in all it seems to
me they are the exceptions, rather than the rule.

I think, Nova Roma, if ever had it, lost its way. I'm not even being
extremely original in saying this, as many have said that before me,
and probably other will do after me. If the purpose was really
creating one day a RL nation, i think by now we all know how
ridiculous the thing is.

If it was to revive the Religio Romana, I think it not only didn't add
much to the general worldwide pagan revival movement (said without
offense, I just can't find a better term to define it), but generally
the whole subject has substantially fallen in the background in the
every day Nova Roma life.

The developement towards a RL association that had started to take
place a couple of years ago, at least in Europe,and that I had looked
upon with great favor has substantially aborted (sometimes taken over
by parallel national projects towards which I have mixed feelings).

With the exception of Madrid and Rome, I've heard of no other RL
community being created, and of those two, at least Rome (maybe my
fault in this, I do not know) is struggling. The yearly European
conventa are indeed a funny way to spend a week, but they do not
rapresent, in my opinion, anything more than a peculiar way to spend a
summer week. It's true I've mostly been absent from those, but I've
not seen anything practical, not even a vague project, coming out from
those, anything that would help creating a feeling of being part of
something going anywhere rather than a more or less numerous group of
individuals sharing a more or less vague sense of fascination from a
2000 years old reality. As a Tribunus, I subscribed to all the
european and several non-european provincial mailing lists and with
the exception of Spain (who I think it's slowing down too, but that's
just a perception) and Italy, they seem pretty much comatose as well.

The practical projects on the field remained projects: even the MM
project, as I can percieve it, has basically stalled, and no other
project has been brought forward. Obviously, we do not have the
economical resources, and I do not see a way to gather them, to do
anything really practical. Serapio had the brilliant, indeed
brilliant, idea of the literary contest, but that also seemed more
like the occasional lightning in an otherwise darkly clouded night.

In my year as a Tribunus I've learned that 90% of the energies of the
(not quite surprisingly less and less) active members are spent in
drafting elaborate and substantially void of any practical RL effect
laws, edicts and whatever, arguing about susch intellectual creatures,
discussing about what this or that person as done or hasn't done (but
more correctly, said or not said, as most have lost the perception of
the difference of DOING and SAYING, and actually equating having
written a mail as actually having DONE something).

If Nova Roma would be disbanded today, all that would be left is an
archive of several thousands of emails, a Tabularium with several
hundreds of laws and edicts ruling a community of a couple of hundreds
of active people and what else? And do you see this changing in the
next year or two? I do not.

The truth is that for every single possible function of Nova Roma
there are other, better, alternatives: letting aside the utopistic
micronational project, for the Religio (which, incidentally, seems to
be more of an individual rytes thing than anything else, probably
because it's practically impossible to celebrate the great public
celebrations) there are many smaller, local, but RL "circles" (again,
said without offense). For re-constructionism, many more organized and
rl group (that Nova Roma "sponsors", which practically means "oh, we
want to let you know that we think you are so cool"), for academic
discussions, better rl and online venues.

What's our original or specific trait? And most especially, what do we
want to achieve? Untill we do no thave a list, possibly in a
hierachical graduation, of at least potentially achievable goals, we
shall nevr know in which direction we must move. Right now our goals
are vague, general, some of them utopistic, so much that if you'd ask
to 10 nova roman what is nova roma about, i think you'd get at least
8, if not 10, different answers. Some might consider this as a good
thing, a show of vitality and difference, I think that's a show of
confusion an lack of direction which essentially leave us with nowhere
to go and bring us to be stuck in an infinite talk about our
"institutions" and "laws" and little more.

We have 200 more or less active members, and probably about (more, if
we count the senate) 50 of them are busy, in various degrees
(magistrates, scribae, cohortes, consultants and so on and so forth),
in "governing" the others. Not even the most bureocratic nation of all
time had 1 governing person for every 3 governed. The "governing"
activity is sucking up almost all the energies, thoughts, time of the
association (it's enough to check the last 3 months of posts on the
mailing list.. I'd say that 80% to 90% of the post are "legislative"
and "governing" matters and comments about those), and that, long from
being considered pathological, has became so normal that a debate of
what is Nova Roma, what is its purpose, "where it is going and how to
go there" debate has disappeared totally after the last, weak,
appearance of maybe a couple of years ago.

We apparently forgot that governing is not a goal, but a mean to DO
something.. running a country, in case of nations, or achieving the
original or intervened objectives, for an association. But what are
our practical objectives at this point?

Valete,

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Tribunus Plebis MMDCCLVIII a. U. c.
Aedilis Urbis Iterum


SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------







---------------------------------
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis
Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41741 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: An invite to a debate
> Salve Domiti Constantini Fusce et onmes,

This is a great topic.In Nova Roms as well as all organizations it is
very healthy to have debates like this every so often in order to see
how we stand, what the popular consensus is and where we will go in
th future. I have two points I'd like to make:
>
1) The main reality I see as I have witnessed in so many other
organizations and lets say multi-cultural societies is that even
anongst hundreds, if not thousands of members, you are always have a
small core of people who keep the group going, always take
resposibilities, organize parties and events, contribute extra money
out of their own pockets and their personal time. The majority are
quite content to to go along for the ride, come to the fun and events
but do not wish to get too involved or make short or long term
commitments. For the core people that is understandable and though
people leave, dreams fail to materialize at times, the core people of
the organization just keep moving along come hell or high water.
Sadly some less active people, especially when things go a little
awry,start getting a little critical and mor e vocal questioning if
the organization is really more of a friend's of families'
dictatorship. I am not speaking of NR in particular but of our
Mexican society here in Edmonton. We are not a web based group but
many of the problems and issues seem so similar and one must learn to
live with these realities and keep plodding on because those critics
who hurt our sensetivies, more often than not will not step up to the
plate and demonstrate how much better they can do at the job.

2) I know there has been much discussion about being in cyberspace
and perpetually staying trapped in that mode. To me, this is a two
edged sword because none of this NR concept could have happened 20
years ago and although ou could have had small private clubs with re-
enactment legions all over the world, I see no way how we could have
ever achieved this on a world wide basis.

3) When talking to other people, I tell them that we are essentially
a society where all the members have a real love for Ancient Rome in
common, that much of our spare time is spent discussing and learning
things Roman, for many to have the opportunity to practice the
Religio which is starting to re-emerge and to take all her positive
aspects from the virtues, philosophies and language and apply them to
every day life. Though we may not bee 100% accurate or authentic,
what better way is there to learn than by studying the Academia's
history, philosophy and Latin courses, take part in running as a
magistrate. In most cases I see that you only get out what you put
into it. Also from what I have seen you are lucky to see one person
in a hundred that has this interest and dediction to Rome. Weekends
are for golf, football, hockey, dancing and night clubing for so many
and without the spark or yearning for Ancient Rome, you can do little
or nothing to convert them. I go along with this years post census
concept that quality is better than quantity. I noticed for example
that some of the smaller provinces, tribes and families have more
assidui or civil servants and magistrates than bigger ones so pining
on whether we have only 200 active people instead of 2000 may not
really make a difference in the long run.


4) Finally, for nebies or those intrested in a good summation of what
is Nova Roma, I see we made the Wikipedia; don't forget, however the
importance of the religio which was the basis for getting NR off the
ground:

Nova Roma

Nova Roma is an Internet-based micronation created in 1998 to study
and restore ancient Roman culture. It works as a virtual independent
country, with its own constitution, law, government, senate and
university. Its government and law system is based on that of the
Roman Republic, but, of course, updated to current days.

There are currently 2478 members, of whom 1521 are considered active
members or citizens (as of June 2005).

Contents [hide]
1 Government and administrative divisions
2 Mailing lists and sodalitates
3 Academia Thules
4 External links



[edit]
Government and administrative divisions
Government is elected by popular vote, and is hold centrally by
several officers.

Two Censors responsible for controlling population databases;
Two Consuls that handle day-to-day operations in order to keep Nova
Roma working;
Two Praetors, deputies for the Consuls;
Four Aediles, administrate public events;
Eight Quaestors, control the Treasury and the budget;
Five Plebeian Tribunes, who have the power of veto when note any
violation of public rights;
Vigintisexviri, responsible for "miscelaneous" works, such as
webmastering, moderating, editoring etc.
As Nova Roma counts on citizens from all the world, it has had its
government segmented into many administrative divisions called
Provinces. There are currently 27 Provinces around the world.

[edit]
Mailing lists and sodalitates
In Nova Roma, "life" happens on the e-mail discussion lists or
groups, where all the citizens are able to explore a variety of
subjects related to Ancient Rome. The "Main List" is where Nova Roman
life mostly happens, and official publication is informed.

There are also the so-called sodalitates, that are special interest
groups. For example, there are the Sodalitas Latinitas, dedicated to
study Latin language, Sodalitas Militarum, related to military
subjects, Sodalitas pro Coqueror et Coquus, for ancient food and
drink discussions etc.

[edit]
Academia Thules
Academia Thules while staffed by members of Nova Roma it has no
official ties to Nova Roma. The virtual university offers online
courses on History, Philosophy, Archaeology, Religion, Language,
Military Arts, Law.

[edit]
External links
http://www.novaroma.org
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova_Roma"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41742 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: An invite to a debate--A response from a long time member
F. Galerius Aurelianus S.P.D.

I would like to respond to the citizen from Italia's recent comments. You
are both right and wrong. I agree with much of what you wrote and disagree with
much of what you wrote. I would like to place my response without going
point to point.

There are way too many laws in Nova Roma and our administration is bloated
for an online organization our size. I recently suggested that it would be a
positive change if our Pontifex Maximus and cofounder were to delete the entire
main list. It would wipe out a number of uncivil, wasteful, and downright
insulting posts (including some from both Fuscus and myself) and wipe the slate
clean so we could rebuild correctly. There are enough individuals among the
active membership who have copies of the Constitution and by-laws of our
organization to bring the necessary rules down to a proper size that are both
utilitarian and historically accurate. If you exclude the belief that it is somehow
taboo to wipe out all those laws with people's names on them, I still find it
hard to understand how modern individuals cannot see that a voluntary
organization should not just wipe out the redundancy and get a set of workable rules
of moderate volume. It is this failure to realize how much we need to get down
to basics that has kept my NR activities tied exclusively to religious
activities and away from the politics and administration.

The only individuals who would actually be affected by such an act would be
the assidui who would have to provide proof of their membership. The socii
would be wiped out of existence (a good thing in my opinion) and we could
actually require a smaller membership fee across the board based on the per capita
per nation. We could limit the number of corporate officers to a level that is
appropriate. We could also give our citizens a membership card; something
that most organizations find to be a basic requirement.

I disagree with you completely on the subject of the Sacra et Religio which
is not at all surprising considering that I am a practitioner and hold a
flaminate. I believe that there has been more positive progress in reconstructing
the practices of the old Roman Religion via Nova Roma and the SVR in the last
six years than has been done in the previous half century via the academic path.

As a citizen of Italy it is understandable that you would find that there has
been very little progress in our Real Life activities especially here in the
USA and Canada. By comparison in size and population, Italy and Spain are
much smaller and it is relatively easier to get from one point to another (unless
traveling from Apulia to the North) and rail travel in Europe is generally
more advanced than here in the USA (the gasoline hog of the modern world).
However, there have been a number of regular events held at the provincial and
family (the majority of the Galeri are centralized) level here and some public
rites have been held at pagan events in Tennessee, Maryland, Maine, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, California, and (I believe) New York. This week there will be a
public Lupercalia rite held in middle Tennessee with participants coming from up to
160 miles away. Our overall USA & Canadian membership here is just too
scattered to arrange a national meetings as yet.

I would also agree with another gentleman who suggested that there is
something not quite right about assigning Italia the status of a province. It is
somehow a fundamental mistake not to give Italia and the Urbs a somewhat
different status within our organization.

Vadete in pacem Cereri.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41743 From: Maior Date: 2006-02-11
Subject: Re: An invite to a debate
M. Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
well it's up to you Fusce. I know on my part I'm very
involved in doing research on the religio Romana,I've written and am
writing rituals and carmen and intending to go to Elysium festival
in Ohio next September to meet in real life Modianus, Metellus,
Censor Hadrianus, Piscinus and others.
I'm also the producer of "Vox Romana" our radio podcast,
which should premiere around the Cerealia.
I also am taking Avitus' Spoken Latin class at Academia
Thules, which is fantastic. I have every intention of starting a
spoken Latin circle and speaking with my NR friends in Latin.
I also have wonderful friends: Quitilianus Buteo (Sweden),
Caius Curius Saturninus (Finland), Aulus Apollonius Cordus (Great
Britian), Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus (Lagus Magni), & friends to
meet & make at the Conventus.
I've gotten so much from NR; far more than I've put in.
It's something I believe in, love and am devoted to. I want my life
to embody the great values of Rome; NR does that.
bene vale in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior, aedile plebis
producer "Vox Romana" podcast
cultrix of the Religio Romana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41744 From: Peter Bird Date: 2006-02-12
Subject: Re: New website for PROVINCIA ITALIA
Salve, Francisce Apule Caesar, et salvete omnes!

[1] I've visited the site and am impressed : attractive and friendly.

[2] "Italia Provincia" does seem somewhat anomalous. As Italia is the "fons
et origo" of Romanitas itself - and therefore by extension of Nova Roma, if
Nova Roma is the resurrected Rome - how can it be a province of itself? If
Nova Roma is Roma resurgens, from where does its 'resurgens' come if not
from Rome? And Rome is Italy. To call Italia something other than Provincia
would give rise to problems of nomenclature, perhaps, but it's certainly
worth following up Caesar's comment.

[3] I've been following the comments started off by Fuscus's post on the
meaning and direction of Nova Roma. For myself, I am happy here. I don't
post much because my macronational life at the moment takes up such an
enormous amount of time, but I do follow all the posts, both in the main
list and in Latinitas. I joined because I saw here a group of people whose
passion for all things Roman attracted me. My interests have always been
language, literature and history, and all these are satisfied. Perhaps Nova
Roma is something different for each member, and that is its power.

Vivat Romanitas Resurgens!

Vale et valete optime.

Sextus Pontius Pilatus Barbatus



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of FAC
Sent: 11 February 2006 16:55
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] New website for PROVINCIA ITALIA



Salvete Omnes,

the Provincia Italia have a new website at

http://italia.novaroma.org

Here you'll find information about the provincial administration, a
short vademecum about Nova roma in italian, articles about the roman
history of this Land and its most important roman men. And again
military, religious and cultural details.
Currently the website is in italian and we're accomplishing the
pinacotheca.

P.S.: I would recall to the Consules and the Illustri Senatores that
the title "Provincia" applied to Italia is a terrible historical
error. Rome never called Italy (the mother land) easily "Provincia".
Maybe we could discuss about it.

Valete
Franciscus Apulus Caesar
Senator et ProConsul Italiae






SPONSORED LINKS


Roman
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Roman+empire&w2=Ancient
+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+roman+empire
&c=5&s=113&.sig=V_ohQEPlKSUophzoyeKo7A> empire

Ancient
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Roman+empire&w2=Anci
ent+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+roman+emp
ire&c=5&s=113&.sig=qUOMYbt4Zn7Yl_BI9eyvCA> history

Citizenship
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Citizenship+test&w1=Roman+empire&w2=Anc
ient+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+roman+em
pire&c=5&s=113&.sig=i89al2nzLhouXVUtOu-wDQ> test


Fall
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Roman+empir
e&w2=Ancient+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+
roman+empire&c=5&s=113&.sig=cvvUbwFz4SII0tNReHlQkw> of the roman empire

The
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+roman+empire&w1=Roman+empire&w2=Anc
ient+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+roman+em
pire&c=5&s=113&.sig=o0D-t5cCQCdxurytCXSC7Q> roman empire





_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41745 From: Shadow DarkFyre Date: 2006-02-12
Subject: Re: An invite to a debate--A response from a long time member
Citizens of Nova Roma,

I've kept a track of this particular discussion. If I may, I would like to address the concern with my own insight into the problem of growth and activity.

In His Name,
ShadowDarkFyre the LordVengeance, ur-Lord
Caer Portshire, the Dells
The Domain and Realms - http://thedomainandrealms.batcave.net

PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:
F. Galerius Aurelianus S.P.D.

I would like to respond to the citizen from Italia's recent comments. You
are both right and wrong. I agree with much of what you wrote and disagree with
much of what you wrote. I would like to place my response without going
point to point.

There are way too many laws in Nova Roma and our administration is bloated
for an online organization our size. I recently suggested that it would be a
positive change if our Pontifex Maximus and cofounder were to delete the entire
main list. It would wipe out a number of uncivil, wasteful, and downright
insulting posts (including some from both Fuscus and myself) and wipe the slate
clean so we could rebuild correctly. There are enough individuals among the
active membership who have copies of the Constitution and by-laws of our
organization to bring the necessary rules down to a proper size that are both
utilitarian and historically accurate. If you exclude the belief that it is somehow
taboo to wipe out all those laws with people's names on them, I still find it
hard to understand how modern individuals cannot see that a voluntary
organization should not just wipe out the redundancy and get a set of workable rules
of moderate volume. It is this failure to realize how much we need to get down
to basics that has kept my NR activities tied exclusively to religious
activities and away from the politics and administration.

The only individuals who would actually be affected by such an act would be
the assidui who would have to provide proof of their membership. The socii
would be wiped out of existence (a good thing in my opinion) and we could
actually require a smaller membership fee across the board based on the per capita
per nation. We could limit the number of corporate officers to a level that is
appropriate. We could also give our citizens a membership card; something
that most organizations find to be a basic requirement.

I disagree with you completely on the subject of the Sacra et Religio which
is not at all surprising considering that I am a practitioner and hold a
flaminate. I believe that there has been more positive progress in reconstructing
the practices of the old Roman Religion via Nova Roma and the SVR in the last
six years than has been done in the previous half century via the academic path.

As a citizen of Italy it is understandable that you would find that there has
been very little progress in our Real Life activities especially here in the
USA and Canada. By comparison in size and population, Italy and Spain are
much smaller and it is relatively easier to get from one point to another (unless
traveling from Apulia to the North) and rail travel in Europe is generally
more advanced than here in the USA (the gasoline hog of the modern world).
However, there have been a number of regular events held at the provincial and
family (the majority of the Galeri are centralized) level here and some public
rites have been held at pagan events in Tennessee, Maryland, Maine, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, California, and (I believe) New York. This week there will be a
public Lupercalia rite held in middle Tennessee with participants coming from up to
160 miles away. Our overall USA & Canadian membership here is just too
scattered to arrange a national meetings as yet.

I would also agree with another gentleman who suggested that there is
something not quite right about assigning Italia the status of a province. It is
somehow a fundamental mistake not to give Italia and the Urbs a somewhat
different status within our organization.

Vadete in pacem Cereri.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41746 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2006-02-12
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Salve Marinus,

> Just send the image file to webmaster AT novaroma DOT org with a request
> to have it added to your Album Civium page.

Thanks for the info. Early last year, (before Scaevola was webmaster) I sent two emails to the
webmaster (my mid term memory is non-existent-- I think that Calvus was the webmaster then?) and
received no response.

I've also made 3 requests since January 2006 to have my photo changed :
Once via the 'contact the magistrates' webtool (where I could not attach a photo). The second time
via the Album Gentium (where our webmaster (Quintus Valerius Callidus) email address is hidden and
where I could not attach a photo. So I'm wondering if the webtools are working properly.
The third time was via D. Claudius Aquilius Germanicus who had emailed me offlist about something
else and mentioned that he was a scribe for the NR main site.
I could have emailed Octavius, but since he is the owner of the website and not the webmaster, I
didn't want to bother him.

Thanks for sending us the webmaster's email address so I can contact him directly. I could not find
any direct email address for him on the NR site. Is it listed somewhere and I missed it? Basically
my head looks sideways in my NR Profile and in real life, it is quite perpendicular to my
shoulders...

Vale,
Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41747 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-02-12
Subject: Reprise - An invite to a debate
Salve

(Long post warning)

I see my post has indeed originated some reactions, and i'd like to address
each one of the, included the indirect one of Censor Marinus, if I may.

A general consideration tho. I see most of the replies came from new members
who indeed show enthusiasm, and that's godd and normal of course, but who I
do not think understood the underlining motive of my post in the first
palce, and that at the same replied geneally in what it sounded as a feeling
exposition rather than addressing the practical concerns I was exposing.
Some actually seemed to take the matter quite personally tho. I do not see
why, as the reason of my posting was not bellittling anyone or the
association at a whole, or placing blame (if I did in my post, I did it once
and to myself for the not exactly flourishing situation in the Urbs), but to
express my personal perception about the status of the associaiton (to
which, after I can't remembr anymore how many years around, I suppose I'm
entitled to, and to express that as well) and to encourage an exchange of
opinions and, if the problems outlined are somehow recognized as existant
rather thn a birth of my imagination, brainstorm about possible solutions.

Have to say that it appears to me that, in general, no one has actually
denied that most f the things I exposed are true. If that was because most
people thought those concerns to be so ridicolous to not deserve being
addressed, because the "how the hell he dares to say such things" feeling
overwhelmed the analysis skills of the posters or because most of them are,
in their own words, new members and thus lacking the long term perspective
needed to actually do such analysis, i do not know, tho.

Anyway...

*M. Lucretius Agricola: *Thank you for the welcome back. I do agree with you
that the impossibility of replying the "what is Nova Roma?" question (which,
have to say, is far from being a merely philosophical question to me) lies
mostly on "not that Nova Roma is nothing, but that Nova Roma is too many
things." I do not know if you actually was giving that "too many things" a
negative connotation, tho, but to me, that sounds as a problem. I thikn Nova
Roma should have, let's say, a broad definition and 5 (primary) goals
outlined and pursued, to avoid what I percieve as a floating withou
direction state.

Also, it is indeed possible that Nova Roma is indeed an active and
flourishing association and the perception I have, ostly opposite, is ased
only because most o fits activities happens off list,as yo usay. I doubt it,
but I accept the possibility.. but than even that would be a great problem,
as I think we'd all agree that, if so, it would be of the utmost importance
for us and for teh external getting in touch with us that this actvity be
made of public knoweledge.

Finally, I do agree with you (and others) that it's better quality than
quantity in members, yet my concern was not directed at the declining of teh
overall numbers, but of the actives (and I do not mean tax paying, I mean
really active) members.. it seems to me, but again it might be just a
perception (even if I could probably give some good hint, if not evidence,
of that) that this number is, indeed, declining over the last 2 or 3 years.

Also, thank you for the polite tone of your reply. And, I shall try to make
it to the Conventum, while I should maybe be in London in the mid of march
for a week or so (incidentally, I shall be in Berlin next weekend an again
two week-ends after and in Paris right after Easter... just in case).

*Robert <centorious@...>*, of whom the NR name is unkow to me. Your
reply was indeed a tad less polite, but anyway, you say among the rest "You
offer no positve alternatives to the bkeak and dreary pall you cast upon our
Nation". No, indeed I do not at this stage. I do not presume I have the sent
from above solution to the problems of Nova Roma. Actually, I do not even
presume I am fully correct in my analysis of those, which was precisely, as
I stated above, the point of my post. I was, and am, looking for a
confrontation of perceptions and ideas and, from there, move on in finding
shared solution if a problem is indeed agreed upon as being present. That's
ow consructive discussions proceed.

You took my post in a personal way, I have no idea why, but I shall blame
it on your newby enthusiasm (which I praise) . You refused the debate with
that "Until you can find a more constuctive and respectful tone when putting
down our people than there can be no debate." and of course is your right
to refuse debate, but I take strong objection on your reason as I do not
think I was disrespectful nor putting down our people and even stronger
objection to your "you even lash out at our Religeon" statement.

Gaius Livinus Crassus, I think you are in the best position to cast your
opinion as anyone else here. I seem to percieve, from the many "is the goal
of NR to..." questions an indirect confirmation of my impression that the
goals of Nova Roma are indeed not clear to you (as they are not anymore to
me either), which is one of my main concerns, or at least not generally
clearly exposed (please, correct me if I did read to omuch in your lines).

You, on the other hand, disagree on my perception of the community of Nova
Roma being declining in active members, and I'd appreciate if you could tell
me what, besides the main mailing list, gives you the impression of an
active and vibrant community.

About the Senate, there is indeed now a law to put a cap to the senators
numbers (I still think they are presently too many, with I think one every 5
tax payers, but that's just my personal opinion).

And I like the idea of the Senate outlining a plan for the next years, even
if that would limit the Consuls' authority and autonomy I guess, which would
be probably cause turmoil.

Yet i like the idea which brings me to

*Gnaeus Equitius Marinus,* who did not reply directly to me but to Livinius
Crassus and that "the goals that I placed before the Senate (and the Senate
ratified) back during my consular year two years ago.". I will take that you
thought of presenting to the Senate such goals because you felt like I do
feel now, that the goals were not clear and had to be outlined clearly in
order to be pursued.

Yet, probably for my own fault, I was not aware of such act of yours, nor of
what those Senate-approved goals are. Maybe it would be useful to repropose
those to the public here as I think I'm not the only one in this igorance
situation and to post them over the website too for newbies to know that we
stand for.

Gaivs Cassivs Piso, first of all, I'd like to say that your comments are
welcomed, even as perspective citizen, as the ones of the new and old
members :) also, I'd like to make clear that I'm not a Tribunus anymore, I
was last year and I ceased from the function in January, which is the year
my sigatue refers to. I shall make my signature less confusing as I close
this post, as it seems to have ingenerated this mistak a couple of times
already and a apologize for that.

Then, as for yoru mail, I'm glad we share the feeling we have an absurdely
large number of legal resolutions. As for the deifnition issue, I disagree
with you as yes of course I can define Ancient Rome. It would be a long
definition, of course, but can be summarized simply in Ancient Rome was a
statual entity with all the attribution and goals of such human social
entities (and no, Ancient Rome was not a philosphical conception, even if
inside the frame of it philosophical conceptions did indeed born and thrived
or a set of laws, even if indeed it was rules by such... and so on and so
forth).

The deifnition of what Nova Roma is, or at least what is Nova Roma is for,
is far from being an absurd or merely philosphical question, as I hope I
made it clear above, but indeed a practical necessity in order to pursue the
practical goals NR aims to.. whatever they are.

As for the constructive criticism, I hope I did answer this line of yours in
the reply i gave to Robert, above.

I thank you for the question of what I did expect when I joined Nova Roma,
and I shall try to answer about that later on in a different mail, both
because doing it here would make this mail even longe rthan it will already
be, but also because I do not think that'd add anything ot teh debate I'm
trying to have.

As for the "Rome wasn't built in a day"... :) Believe me, no one more than
someone living in Rome knows that, especially when it comes to undergrounds
;) Ok, kidding... one can't be always serious.

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus, I appreciat the fact you think such a debate as
I'm trying to raise is healty. I do partly agree with that "Sadly some less
active people, especially when things go a little awry,start getting a
little critical and mor e vocal" (and I shall hope that wasn't a polite way
to slipping in that I'd be one of such people... I might have done less than
others over the last 6 years, but I thik I do not have to prove I've done
more than many as well, but I'm sure that was not your intention, was it?),
as sometimes even active and "core" people might have concerns and vocalize
them. Actually, i think that when those people have, they a the most vocal
ones too, as the less involved eventually raise their concern and then find
better things to involve themsleves into and so you do not ear form them
anymore, while the core ones stay and keep vocalizing and so you keep
hearing them.

I see your what you say to people about us, so to be sure, you think we are
essentially, what define us, "a group of people intersted in Ancient Rome,
many of which are followers of the Religio"? I of course think that's a part
of it.
Yet, it doesn't say much about our goals as you link the Religio Romana as
an attribute of many NR members ("for many to have the opportunity to
practice the Religio") rather than of Nova Roma itself (like an harbor is
for many to repair their boats in a tempest, but is surely not the only
thing). But assuming that Nova Roma is for asisting Religio practitioners
(of course it is, i fully agre with it), is it its primary or sole goal? I
assume we agree it's not, but then what are our other goals and how we can
pursue them (or how we do practically pursue the one about the Religio
either, if we'd have to put it down in a written form)?

And finally, I found most intersting the Wikipedia hint you give as for
anyoen looking at it critically there is, indeed, a HUGE lack in the
index... "Governing and administrative divisions", "Mailing list", "Academia
Thule", "External Links".... where are the GOALS? The description of an
organization always state the goals of it. And, for that, where is the
Religio?? I do not think the lack of such things is a pure coincidence.

F. Galerius Aurelianus, you will allow me to address you with your name, I
hope, despite you referring to me as "the citizen from Italia". We find
ourselves agreeing on teh too many legal resolutions point (apparently,
there's no one disagreeing about it) and even if your offered solution is
maybe a ad radical, indeed it would work. I think that already limiting the
naming of law would already do some help, avoiding the "You shall not touch
my cretaure and my lasting monument to Nova Roma" syndrome. And I like th
membership card idea oto (especially if it was in plastic, imperial purple
red with gold Nova Roma logo.. it would be expensive I suppose, but
definitel cool).

I do not see why you isagree with me about the Religio tho. I do agree that
those are core maters to Nova Roma, I just said that those has seem to fall
on the background in the NOva Roma life, or at least discussions, supplanted
by discussions about laws, edicts, elections, grievances and, very recently
(but that at least is positive) posts about archeologicla findings. I
thought that was of full evidence, but you are telling me I'm mistaken?

I think, we do disagree on the role of Nova Rom ain the (please give me a
better term for it to use in my future posts) the Religio revival movement.
I think it's secodary, you seem to think it's indee dimportant. I shall beg
to your practitioner insight. You say that "there has been more positive
progress in reconstructing the practices of the old Roman Religion via Nova
Roma and the SVR in the last six years than has been done in the previous
half century via the academic path.". I'll accept that, but if that is the
case, may at least say I didn't have any knoweledge about it thro this
mailing list and the website over the last couple of years at least? And
that, if that is the case, that is still a problem (yes, even as a non
practitioner I think that is a problem fo ral lof us) to our association as
it would be, as Agricola says, that Nova Rome is indeed thriving with
activity, but it just doesn't reach teh members not direcly involved?

I also find something wrong about what you say of teh provincial and
travelling comparison between Europe and Us, but i admit I can't point it
out right now (might even b teh fact it's more than 3 hours 'm analizing the
replies and writing, besides I'm starving), I'll get back to it later, if
you allow me. yet I can say I'm pleased to see all those activities you
list, but maybe there should had been more publicity of those? And also a
calendar, pictures and reports on the website would be a good idea

and lastly

*Shadow DarkFyre <guardianargreg@...>,* to whom I'd suggest a Nova
Roman name and a fitting signature, as otherwise many people will have the
doubt of how serious your presence here is, I have to say that I didn't get
any comment from you after the introductory lines, and if it's a technical
problem of mine, please repost and I'll gladly address those.

And that's all so far, even if I hope more will feel like dropping their own
share to the debate, replyig to my primary post and this, if so they feel.

Valete,

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Former Tribunus Plebis (MMDCCLVIII a. U. c.)
Aedilis Urbis Iterum


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41748 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-02-12
Subject: Re: Reprise - An invite to a debate
Agricola Fusco sal

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
<dom.con.fus@...> wrote:
>
> Salve
>
> (Long post warning)
>
> I see my post has indeed originated some reactions, and i'd like to
address

[snip]

>
> *M. Lucretius Agricola: *Thank you for the welcome back.

[SNIP]

> on "not that Nova Roma is nothing, but that Nova Roma is too many
> things." I do not know if you actually was giving that "too many
things" a
> negative connotation, tho, but to me, that sounds as a problem.

[SNIP]

> but I accept the possibility.. but than even that would be a great
problem,
> as I think we'd all agree that, if so, it would be of the utmost
importance
> for us and for teh external getting in touch with us that this
actvity be
> made of public knoweledge.
>



I think it is a problem too, and for exactly the reason you suggest
here. If I had the time I think I would take on the task of making
myself up a list of contacts, all the people who are doing interesting
things (like this: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aquilaheliaca/ ). I
would contact each of them every month and ask for a VERY short
summary of what is happening with their group or project. I would put
it all together and post it here. I think a quick overview of the
happenings in the Res Publica would be a very useful thing. If only
someone had the time to do this...



> really active) members.. it seems to me, but again it might be just a
> perception (even if I could probably give some good hint, if not
evidence,
> of that) that this number is, indeed, declining over the last 2 or 3
years.
>

I think it is always true, at least in my experience with other
groups, that the inner core of active members is surrounded by a wide
ring of interested but more or less inactive members. And around them
an even wider ring of casual observers. If we could fix this we could
rule the world! Well, not really, but it would be great. The size of
this core fluctuates, for a number of reasons I think.

My opinion is that as long as things run smoothly then all will be
well (mostly). At least I can say that the ML is a MUCH nicer place,
overall, than it was when I joined. I'm very happy about that and I
think it is a positive sign for the future.

> Also, thank you for the polite tone of your reply.

Nothing else is proper between two citizens.

> And, I shall try to make
> it to the Conventum,

As shall I (fingers crossed).

> while I should maybe be in London in the mid of march
> for a week or so (incidentally, I shall be in Berlin next weekend an
again
> two week-ends after and in Paris right after Easter... just in case).
>

I envy twice: you live in Europe and you can travel.


[SNIP]

>
> Valete,
>
> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
>
> Founder of Gens Constantinia
> Former Tribunus Plebis (MMDCCLVIII a. U. c.)
> Aedilis Urbis Iterum
>
>


optime valete!

M. Lucretius Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41749 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-02-12
Subject: Re: Salve! A new member here to swell the ranks!
---
Salve Gaius Livius Crassus et Omnes:

Welcome to the republic. New provisional citizens to swell the
ranks, yes? A healthy edema :>) I've been fascinated with those
things of Rome also, since I was very young. ...that was a few moons
ago, one or two atleast..can't remember exactly.

Anyway, be well, and I'm glad that you and others have decided to
join us.

Pompeia



In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "darren_pile" <devon199@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Populusque Romæ.
>
> I thought I'd take the time to introduce myself; my name is Gaius
> Livius Crassus, a Plebian living in Brittania. I'm aged 23 and a
> father of three.
>
> I've only just received my provisional citizenship for Nova Roma
and
> have just applied to the Censores to take the citizenship test. I
am
> anxious to get started in this wondeful new community and am
looking
> forward to playing my part in its development.
>
> I've held a fascination of Rome for most of my life and its a
rare
> opportunity to be able to converse with citizens of this great and
new
> nation.
>
> Gaius Livius Crassus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41750 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-02-12
Subject: Re: Adding Photos?
Salve Aventina,

Diana Octavia Aventina wrote:

> ... So I'm wondering if the webtools are working properly.

I can state that the one for the censores has been getting e-mail to me
for over a year now. As of 2 Jan this year it has been sending messages
to me and my current colleague, Hadrianus. Before then it sent messages
to me and my former colleague, Quintilianus.

I also know that the senate link works. I think all the other weblinks
work too.

[Webmaster's address]
> Is it listed somewhere and I missed it?

I honestly don't know. Most of those visible e-mail links were removed
about a year ago to cut down on the floods of spam we were all receiving.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41751 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-02-12
Subject: Welcome to All Provisional Citizens
Pompeia Minucia Strabo Quiritibus S.P.D.

I know we've had a cluster of provisional citizens in the last little
while and I would like to convey a warm welcome. If you have any
questions please don't hesitate to ask them here, or you may write me
privately and I'd be happy to answer them or redirect them to the
appropriate individuals.

Additionally, you look on the main website www.novaroma.org, you will
see a section on the front which invites you to contact the
appropriate officials for any information; the site gives you a brief
criteria regarding who handles what spheres of duties.

Valete bene
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 41752 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-02-12
Subject: Official Priorities of Nova Roma [was Reprise - An invite to a deba
Salve Fusce, et salvete quirites,

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus wrote:

> *Gnaeus Equitius Marinus,* who did not reply directly to me but to Livinius
> Crassus and that "the goals that I placed before the Senate (and the Senate
> ratified) back during my consular year two years ago.". I will take that you
> thought of presenting to the Senate such goals because you felt like I do
> feel now, that the goals were not clear and had to be outlined clearly in
> order to be pursued.

Yes, that is correct.

> Yet, probably for my own fault, I was not aware of such act of yours, nor of
> what those Senate-approved goals are. Maybe it would be useful to repropose
> those to the public here as I think I'm not the only one in this igorance
> situation and to post them over the website too for newbies to know that we
> stand for.

They're currently posted in the tabularium, with all the other Senatus
Consulta.

http://novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2004-08-31-results.html

=== Citation Begins ====

VI. The Senate adopts the Senatus Consultum establishing priorities for
Nova Roma and their precedences.

Senatus Consultum establishing priorities for Nova Roma

PRIORITIES FOR NOVA ROMA IN ORDER OF PRECEDENCE

The Senate finds that the following items are all priorities for Nova
Roma. They are hereby established as such, in order of precedence. This
precedence shall not be interpreted to indicate that any item is
unimportant. All are priorities. The sole reason for assigning
precedence is to better focus resources and effort.

I. The Religio Romana; it's promotion, preservation, protection, and
diffusion throughout the communities of Nova Roma.

II. Establishment of a Nova Roma Endowment and its long term growth.

III. Sustaining support of existing projects, including the publication
of the Eagle, the Aedilian Fund for the Magna Mater Project, the
Scholarship Fund, and the Land Fund.

IV. Outreach, recruitment and retention of citizens, including fostering
interest in the activities of the Sodalities.

V. Promotion of Local Group activities.

VI. Encouraging citizens to become involved in the work of government

PASSES - Uti Rogas 17, Antiquo 1, Abstineo 2

=== End of Citation ====

These are our official organizational priorities, adopted by the Senate
in August, a year and a half ago.

Vale, et valete,

-- Marinus