Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Mar 1-6, 2006

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42319 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42320 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: A few religious questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42321 From: Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42322 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42323 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare Regarding Edictum dated Feb 18
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42324 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Kal. Mar.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42325 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: A few religious questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42326 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: CUBA LIBRE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42327 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: On warriorhood and other folks...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42328 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: On warriorhood and other folks...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42329 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Do ex-Boni drink wine from lead cups?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42330 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42331 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare Regarding Edictum dated Feb 18
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42332 From: Steven Harris Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: A few religious questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42333 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: On warriorhood and other folks...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42334 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42335 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: CUBA LIBRE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42336 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42337 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: A few religious questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42338 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42339 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: CUBA LIBRE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42340 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42341 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: CUBA LIBRE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42342 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: On warriorhood and other folks...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42343 From: caiusmoraviusbrutus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42344 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42345 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42346 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: CUBA LIBRE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42347 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42348 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: BARBANCOURT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42349 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42350 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: CUBA LIBRE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42351 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: TEQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42352 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42353 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42354 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42355 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: BARBANCOURT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42356 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42357 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42358 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42359 From: P.M. Albucius Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare Regarding Edictum dated Feb 18
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42360 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Off Topic August Spies
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42361 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: CUBA LIBRE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42362 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: A few religious questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42363 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: On warriorhood and other folks...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42364 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42365 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42366 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: RENVNTIATIO PRAESCRIPTORIS ACADEMIAE THVLES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42367 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42368 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42369 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Off Topic August Spies
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42370 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42371 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42372 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42373 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42374 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42375 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42376 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: CUBA LIBRE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42377 From: Gaius Asinius Pollio Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42378 From: Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42379 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42380 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42381 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42382 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: History Of Distillation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42383 From: caiusmoraviusbrutus Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42384 From: caiusmoraviusbrutus Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42385 From: Gaius Asinius Pollio Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42386 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42387 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42388 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42389 From: bcatfd@together.net Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2362
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42390 From: Gaius Asinius Pollio Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42391 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42392 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42393 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42394 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42395 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Kalendis Martiis and the Calendar for March
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42396 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42397 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42398 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42399 From: Gaius Asinius Pollio Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42400 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: post. Kal. Mar (a.d. VI Non. Mar.)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42401 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42402 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42403 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: Rome in the East (Battle Of Carrahe)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42404 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42405 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42406 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: Rome in the East (Battle Of Carrahe)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42407 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: Rome in the East (Battle Of Carrahe)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42408 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: EDICTUM PROPRAETORICUM IV ABOUT PROVINCIAL ADMINISTRATION APPOINTME
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42409 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Citizen Authors! Hail!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42410 From: daylily218 Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: I'm Overwhelmed!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42411 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42412 From: Emilia Curia Finnica Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42413 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42414 From: Brooke Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: New to Group!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42415 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: New to Group!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42416 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42417 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: [NRCollegiumPontificum] Edictum Consulare Regarding Edictum dat
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42418 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42419 From: Gaius Asinius Pollio Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42420 From: Marcus Iulius Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Elezione dei nuovi Aediles Urbis/ election of the new Aediles Urbis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42421 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Alkeehol & other adult topics
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42422 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Elezione dei nuovi Aediles Urbis/ election of the new Aediles U
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42423 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Do ex-Boni drink wine from lead cups?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42424 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Do ex-Boni drink wine from lead cups?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42425 From: caiusmoraviusbrutus Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42426 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Alkeehol & other adult topics
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42427 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: a.d. V Non. Mar.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42428 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Do ex-Boni drink wine from lead cups?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42429 From: André Cidade Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42430 From: Gaius Asinius Pollio Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42431 From: Brooke Dunlap Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: New to Group!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42432 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42433 From: Sertorius Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42434 From: albmd323232 Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: History Channel now!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42435 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42436 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-04
Subject: THE CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR MARCH 3, 2006 (2759)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42437 From: André Cidade Date: 2006-03-04
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42438 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-04
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42439 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2006-03-04
Subject: Volunteers Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42440 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: CUBA LIBRE (off topic)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42441 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: a.d. III Non. Mar.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42442 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: FYI David Meadow's Explorator 8.45 March 5, 2006
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42443 From: Gaius Asinius Pollio Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42444 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: Do ex-Boni drink wine from lead cups?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42445 From: robertpartlow Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42446 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42447 From: robertpartlow Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42448 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Status of G. Asinius Pollio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42449 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42450 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42451 From: Gaius Asinius Pollio Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42452 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42453 From: Semiramis Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Greetings and Salutations... Newbie alert
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42454 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: EDICTVM CENSORIVM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42455 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: Greetings and Salutations... Newbie alert
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42456 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: Greetings and Salutations... Newbie alert
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42457 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42458 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor Petitio Actionis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42459 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42460 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42461 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor Petitio actionis Domi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42462 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor Petitio actionis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42463 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Office Of Tribunes - Censorial Resignation Notice
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42464 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42465 From: robertpartlow Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42466 From: robertpartlow Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42467 From: Michael Costa Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42468 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC: Alkeehol & other adult topics
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42469 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: CONVENTUS . . . almost . .Conventiculum.BoreoOccidentalis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42470 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: prid. Non. Mar.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42471 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor Petitio actionis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42472 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor Petitio actionis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42473 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor Petitio actionis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42474 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor Petitio actionis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42475 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor Petitio actionis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42476 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: A few religious questions - just to clear things up--From the flame
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42477 From: Karen Blackburn Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42478 From: duy mai Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: CONVENTUS . . . almost . .Conventiculum.BoreoOccidentalis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42479 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42480 From: Tita Artoria Marcella Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC: Alkeehol & other adult topics
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42481 From: duy mai Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC: Alkeehol & other adult topics
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42482 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: CONVENTUS . . . almost . .Conventiculum.BoreoOccidentalis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42483 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued VI Mart
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42484 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: THE CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR MARCH 3, 2006 (2759)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42485 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: THE CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR MARCH 3, 2006 (2759)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42486 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor Petitio actionis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42487 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: THE CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR MARCH 3, 2006 (2759)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42488 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42489 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42490 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Propraetor of America Austrorientalis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42491 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42492 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Oh for petes sake Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42493 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42494 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42319 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
Salvete omnes,

I found an intersting article which sheds some light as to why some
followers have problems with this term and I got it from "About.Com"


Judeo-Christian tradition

Judeo-Christian tradition (also spelled Judaeo-Christian) is the
body of concepts and values held in common by Christianity and
Judaism.

Christianity emerged from Judaism in the first century of the common
era. Christians brought from Judaism its scriptures; fundamental
doctrines such as monotheism; the belief in a Messiah, a term that
is more commonly known as Christ (christos in Greek) and
means 'anointed one'; form of worship, including a priesthood,
concepts of sacred space and sacred time, the idea that worship here
on Earth is patterned after worship in Heaven, and the use of the
Psalms in community prayer.

Users of the term Judeo-Christian, pointing out that Christians and
Jews have many sacred texts and ethical standards in common, also
generally hold that Christians and Jews worship the same God.

The term was used in the United States of America in an attempt to
create a non-denominational religious consensus or civil religion
that by embracing Judaism avoids the appearance of anti-Semitism.
The original uses of the term have faded and now usually refers to a
general western religious background and the term is commonly used
by historians and academics as a shorthand for the predominant
religious influences upon Western culture.

Problems with the term

The phrase "Judeo-Christian" has been criticized for implying more
commonality than actually exists. In The Myth of the Judeo-Christian
Tradition, Jewish theologian-novelist Arthur A. Cohen questions the
theological appropriateness of the term and suggests that it was
essentially an invention of American politics. [1]

Judaism and Christianity have many areas of agreement, as well as
sharply defined ethical and religious systems that are in some areas
opposites. Generally neither Jews nor Christians want to have their
distinctive traits removed by an oversimplification. Opponents of
this term claim that the concept collapses these important
differences, and effects a modern appropriation of Jewish identity
to Christian values. They point to the traditional Christian claim
that Christianity is the logical progression of, and heir to,
Biblical Judaism, as precedent.

The term "Judeo-Christian" is seen by some to imply a rejection of
Islam, the third major monotheistic (Abrahamic) religion, though it
is related to both. The term "Judeo-Christian values" is commonly
used in the West, and many Muslim scholars view this term as
emblematic of a disconnect between Western-culture Christianity and
Islam. Attempts have been made to unite this split, followed closely
by attempts to discredit them. The term "Judeo-Christian-Islamic"
has been coined to describe the values shared by the common history
of the three religions. This term has been used, for example, by
Abrahamic faith gatherings held in various cities of the U.S., which
are designed to promote mutual understanding, and have drawn the
participation of Christians, Jews, and Muslims. This has been
ridiculed by the American Family Association [2], an activist
organization of the Christian right, as a movement promoted
by "Muslim special-interest groups" to make "radical Islamist
fundamentalism" appear mainstream and tolerant of Judaism and
Christianity. Though the AFA scoffs at the implication that "all
traditions are equally valid", cultural relativism is one of the key
concepts of modern anthropology. Columbia University professor Dick
Bulliet has an up-coming book about this topic called "Islamo-
Christian Civilization," due out in 2004.


qsp - I hope this helps a bit.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42320 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: A few religious questions
M. Hortensia Sex. Pontio Pilato Barbato spd;
my apologies!
Try and imagine if a Muslim used the term "Christano-Muslim"...& you
would be thinking 'hey I don't believe in Muhammad, don't believe or
read the Qur'an, eat pork, -why's he including me?' (but you'd get
killed if you objected;-)
glad you're enjoying it; me too,
And I wish all my Christian friends in NR, a solemn Ash Wednesday
bene vale
Marca Hortensia Maior
>
> It wasn't me who used the term 'Judaeo-Christian!! (though it may
well be a
> part of my vocabulary ...) However, I have been following this
thread
> closely, and am enjoying it very much: plenty of food for thought!
>
> Vale et valete optime.
>
> SPPB
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf
> Of Maior
> Sent: 01 March 2006 02:25
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A few religious questions
>
>
>
> M. Hortensia P Livio Trario spd;
> my fault for poor sentence structure.Islam came after
> Christianity. Warwick Ball makes the interesting point that the
Near
> East went easily over to Christianity and later to Islam as all
> these ideas were current and part of the syncretic mix..
>
> Today we worship the Baal Shaamin and his son, tomorrow Allah - no
> difference. No difference if I say the Jews worshipped the minor
> god 'El as their national god whilst in Ugarit Baal reigned
supreme.
>
>
> I am making the point about Christianity being the child of the
> syncretic Roman Near Eastern Empire as Barbatus used the ghastly
> expression "Judeao-Christian" over at the Latinitas list.
>
> There is no such thing. Jews then and today have nothing to do
with
> Christian ideas or beliefs; the son of god, eucharist, virgin
> births, original sin, trinitarian ideas,. To Jews, Christianity is
> an entirely separate and distinct religion.
>
> The Christian ministerial students I meet today are taught and
> respect this.
>
> To put this in perspective. All we have to do is look at the
disgust
> the conservative Judaeans had for Herod and his Idumaean birth.
They
> were a tribe forced to convert. The Judaeans had little truck for
> non-Jews. The tiny group of Jews who believed in Jesus had to turn
> to the gentiles and absorb their culture and practices.
>
> This is the reason Christians today do not ritually circumcize or
> follow Jewish laws from Leviticus or even observe the Sabbath.
> Obvious....
>
> bene vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
> >
> >
> > -- P. Livius Triarius
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>
> * Visit your group "Nova-Roma
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.
>
>
>
> _____
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42321 From: Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
EDICTUM CONSULARE

Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki

Ex Officio

This Edictum is issued in collaboration with Quintus Valerius
Callidus, Magister Aranearius.

I. A content managament and collaboration tool has been selected and
installed on the Nova Roma web site. This tool is MediaWiki, the same
software used by wikipedia.org. It is located at:

http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/

II. Most static content of the web site - that is, almost everything
except citizen profile pages - will be moved into the Wiki as time
permits. The Annales and Tabularium are high-priority projects.

III. The following citizens shall be WikiMagisters (Scribae),
possessing administrative accounts within the Wiki, maintaining user
accounts, creating and maintaining templates, creating and enforcing
style guidelines, and supervising edits of articles:

1. Quintus Valerius Callidus, Magister Aranearius.

2. Marcus Octavius Germanicus, Wiki Sysadmin and Bureaucrat.

3. Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus

4. Marcus Lucretius Agricola

IV. Any citizen who wishes to participate may do so by signing up for
a Wiki account and joining the mailing list NRWiki@yahoogroups.com.
Before making any major contributions, please announce on the mailing
list which articles you wish to work on, to avoid duplication of
effort.

Dated Kal. MARTIAS 10:15 AM Roman time, issued officially in the
consulship of Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus and Pompeia Minucia Strabo.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42322 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Salve

On 3/1/06, Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> EDICTUM CONSULARE
>
> Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
>
>
Lovely... can't wait to see the discussions when it will be to outline the
scopes of th association, or the role of the various magistrates in the
check and balance system and so on and so forth and the cries of censorship
when the "editors" (why we do *elect* a magister aerenarius when then a
Consul can *nominate* scribes to basically meddle with the website?) will
"supervise" the contents...

Not that it will not be healty, because it probably will eventually, but
somehow it doesn't sound right this way.

just my two cents,

DCF

--
Personal Website: http://village.flashnet.it/~ua01823/
Personal Blog: http://andunedhel.blogspot.com/


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42323 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare Regarding Edictum dated Feb 18
Cn. Lentulus A. Apollonio sal.:

>>> Without wishing to re-open the debate, amice, I would
just like to make two points on this. <<<

I, too, don't want to re-open the debate: God forbid! By the way, I cannot participate in long Engilsh debates beside my other duties ourside Nova Roma. Simply i don't have time to compose in English... This will be possible when I will know English better, to wich Nova Roma the best place if somebody wants to learn English :-)

>>> ...Secondly, I think you have misrepresented, or perhaps misunderstood, at least some of the criticism of the consul's action. Some of it, including mine, was based to a great extent on the unwritten, historical
constitution. It is in my view absolutely incorrect to
say that "according to this unwritten constitution
Consuls have all the power, the power to do anything
they think to be necessary for the betterment of the
State". <<<<

My source on Roman public law, a recognized book in Hungary, "Janos Zlinszky: Jus Publicum" says what I've said. He says that consuls have all the power to do anything except making law: "Praetor (consul etc.) jus facere non potest." Their edicta, however, are legal by any means as unique orders. If a consul reinstates an augur, it's legal, because with this act he didn't make law, this was just a special act. HOWEVER, which is quastionable is that what he did order whether it was expedient to the Republic or not. The question is not that whether it was legal or not: what a consul does within his imperium it's legal, even if it's against the mos majorum, the tradition, like reinstating augurs. The question is whether it was good, useful, salutary to the state or not. If the senate and the people think that it wasn't, he is condemnable after his consulate.

Zlinszky writes: "A magistrate cannot act unlawfully because he is the living voice of the law, he animates the law. What he does it's lawful act regarding the power of the state, because he was elected to act for the sake of the state. A magistrate can be impeached only if, when he hadn't followed the public norms concerning his acts done for the sake of the state, these acts damaged single citizens or the whole state." (translated from Hungarian by me)

>>> Specifically I do not think you will be able
to find any evidence whatsoever that a consul of the
ancient republic ever attempted to intervene in a
dispute about the membership of one of the priestly
collegia. <<<<

I think you are right in that point, I cannot recall such situation. But now we have a (failed) precedent :-)

>>> I have no doubt that the ancient consules had
no power to do, and would never have done, what C.
Buteo did. >>>

To make a law so that augurs can be appointed by consules surely did not have power. To reinstate an augur as a singular - not normative - act, they had: but never practiced, such as most things consuls could do they did not. This was just by convention, not by law. If a consul would break that convention, wouldn't break any law. We can see how lesser and lesser power was practiced by consules coming to the end of the Republic. Theoretically the consules had this same power even in the imperial period, and, theoretically, they could do anything that the Emperor. They did not. Simply because of a recent convention which was born in the beginning of the principate.

>>> nor is it correct to say, as you said
elsewhere in your message, that under the ancient
constitution a consul's edictum was law: a
magistrate's edictum was merely a statement of policy
and had no binding force in and of itself. <<<

Totally agreed. I didn't say that an edictum was law, it's misunderstood somehow...

I hope it's now clearer what I meant to say about the consular power.

Fac ut valeas!

Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
Quaestor


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice: chiama da PC a telefono a tariffe esclusive

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42324 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Kal. Mar.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est Kalendis Martiis; haec dies nefastus publicus est.

"Come Mars, God of War, lay aside your shield and spear:
A moment, from your helmet, free your shining hair.
What has a poet to do with Mars, you might ask?
The month I sing of takes its name from you.
You see, yourself, fierce wars waged by Minerva:
Is she less free to practice the noble arts for that?
Take time to set aside you lance and follow Pallas'
Example: and find something to do while unarmed...
`If it's right for the secret promptings of the gods
To be heard by poets, as it's rumoured they may,
Tell me, Gradivus, Marching God, why women keep
Your feast, you who are apt to be served by men.'
So I spoke. And Mars answered, laying aside his helmet,
But keeping his throwing spear in his right hand:
Now am I, a god used to warfare, invoked
In pursuit of peace, and I'm carried into new camps,
And I don't dislike it: I like to take on this function,
Lest Minerva think that she alone can do so...
Mamurius carried out the task: whether he was superior
In his craft or his character it would be hard to say.
Gracious Numa said to him: `Ask a reward for your work,
You'll not ask in vain of one known for honesty.'
He'd already given the Salii, named from their leaping (saltus),
Weapons: and words to be sung to a certain tune.
Mamurius replied: `Give me glory as my prize,
And let my name be sounded at the song's end.'
So the priests grant the reward promised for his
Ancient work, and now call out `Mamurius'." - Ovid, Fasti III

"Ares, exceeding in strength, chariot-rider, golden- helmed, doughty
in heart, shield-bearer, Saviour of cities, harnessed in bronze,
strong of arm, unwearying, mighty with the spear, O defence of
Olympus, father of warlike Victory, ally of Themis, stern governor of
the rebellious, leader of righteous men, sceptred King of manliness,
who whirl your fiery sphere among the planets in their sevenfold
courses through the aether wherein your blazing steeds ever bear you
above the third firmament of heaven; hear me, helper of men, giver of
dauntless youth! Shed down a kindly ray from above upon my life, and
strength of war, that I may be able to drive away bitter cowardice
from my head and crush down the deceitful impulses of my soul.
Restrain also the keen fury of my heart which provokes me to tread the
ways of blood-curdling strife. Rather, O blessed one, give you me
boldness to abide within the harmless laws of peace, avoiding strife
and hatred and the violent fiends of death." - Homer, Ode to Ares II.1-17

The month of Martias is dedicated to the god of war, Mars, both in his
aspect as Mars Quirinus, the Protector of the Roman People and Mars
Gravidus, the leader of the Romans at war. Mars was the son of Iuno,
Iuppiter's wife. Iuppiter had given rise to the goddess Minerva by
birthing her through his head. Iuno was jealous of this event, and
asked the goddess Flora to help her in the task of creating a son.
Flora, the goddess of blossoming plants touched Juno with magical
herbs and created Mars in her womb.

Mars raped the vestal virgin Rhea Silvia while she slept, she gave
birth to twins called Romulus and Remus. Rhea was imprisoned because
of the sacred laws of her vows, and her sons were left in baskets on
the river. They were brought up by wolves and eventually founded Rome.
Mars was often depicted riding a two-horse chariot, with a spear and
a shield, both items with magical properties. His shield in particular
was an important object and symbol for the Romans, according to legend
one is said to have fallen from the sky to save the Romans during
battle. Sacred shields were kept in the temples of Mars and the one
alleged to have fallen from the sky was reserved for the Forum, where
it was said to guard Rome from attack.

Primarily Mars was invoked for battle and all things associated with
war. For obvious reasons he was a favorite among soldiers in the Roman
army.


"Girl if you'd marry, delay, however eager both are:
A little delay, at this time, is of great advantage.
Weapons excite to war, war's bad for those married:
The omens will be better when weapons are put away.
Now the girded wife of the peak-capped Flamen Dialis
Has to keep her hair free from the comb." - Ovid, Fasti III

Today is also the celebration of the Matronalia, a feast dedicated to
matrons and their special Protectress, Iuno in her aspect as Iuno
Lucina, the "light bringer". Iuno Lucina was an aspect of the goddess
Iuno associated with light and childbirth. Her name lucina probably
comes from the Latin lucus (grove). Livy records that the grove on the
Esquiline Hill in which a temple was dedicated to her in 375 B.C., is
the origin of her name.

By the second century B.C., Iuno Lucina was associated with childbirth
because the name lucina was thought to have come from the Latin word
lux (light). When a child was born it was said to have been "brought
to light." Women who worshiped Iuno Lucina had to untie knots and
unbraid their hair lest lest these entanglements symbolically block
delivery.

From the many reasons which Ovid gives why the festival was kept on
this day, it is evident that there was no certain tradition on the
subject; but the prevailing opinion seems to have been that it was
instituted in memory of the peace between the Romans and the Sabines,
which was brought about by means of the Sabine women. At this festival
wives used to receive presents from their husbands, and at a later
time girls from their lovers; mistresses also were accustomed to feast
their female slaves.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Homer, Matronalia
(http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/SMIGRA*/Matronalia.html),Mars
(http://www.mysteriousbritain.co.uk/gods&goddesses/mars.html), Iuno
Lucina
(http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Gazetteer/Places/Europe/Italy/Lazio/Roma/Rome/_Texts/PLATOP*/Aedes_Junonis_Lucinae.html)
and (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juno_Lucina)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42325 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: A few religious questions
C. Equitius Cato P. Livio Triario quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Livius Triarius, you wrote:

"I would generally agree with your observations, O Gaius, but with the
reservation that the encroachment upon the dates and timings of pagan
observances was frequently for the purpose of compelling an either/or
choice -- many of the ancients calmly observing the rites of more than
one religion, a thing anathema to the early Christians."

True enough. Christianity in its temporal agenda differed little from
any other group which once having attained power, exercized that power
somewhat injudiciously. By "seamless", I meant that for the vast
majority of the uneducated population, the feast of Saturnalia became
Christmas &c...they would have hardly noticed the difference except
that ikons or statues of the Theotokos and Christ were marched around
before the fun began.

You also wrote:

"I should rather say that it usurps the universal human love for the
mother and child and tries to claim it exclusively as its own; but
this is an issue on which civil disagreement is possible."

We shall civilly disagree :-)


And finally, you wrote:

"I have the impression -- without having found any trustworthy
statistics to support it -- that the great majority of Christians
tolerantly indulge other beliefs in the expectation that if
there is truly but one God he must be so far beyond our full
comrehension that it it no great wonder that different people
apprehend God in different ways."

I could not agree more. The very essence of the Orthodox approach to
theology is precisely that: God in and of Himself is absolutely and
utterly beyond any possible human comprehension; Orthodoxy actually
describes God by defining what He is *not*, rather than trying to
define what He *is*. Of course, Christians also believe that this
totally incomprehensible God made Himself comprehensible in one
specific way: His incarnation as a human being in the Person of Jesus
Christ.

I remarked to another citizen in private that people will by necessity
believe what they *need* to believe in order to make sense out of
chaos and to gain peace in the midst of strife; we are by nature
ritual, order-seeking beings, yet we also look for the mysterious and
wonderful (or "awe-ful" in the word's original meaning). To try to
compel faith because you are "right" is as useful as gathering water
with a sieve. To try to rationalize or "de-mystify" another's faith
is precisely as useful. I don't need rationalizations, I need God. I
don't need technical explanations, I need the Mystery of faith.
Because I recognize that am in need of those things, I must respect
the way or ways in which other individuals express their need.

At the beginning of this season of introspection and repentence, I
wish for all my fellow-citizens that peace which the world cannot
give. May we all touch, and be touched by, the Divine.

"Remember, O Man, that thou art mortal; from dust thou camest and unto
dust thou shalt return. Ashes to ashes, and dust to dust."

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42326 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: CUBA LIBRE
Salve,

Ahumm... It's a Cuba Libre. Take it from a Cuban-American-Nova Roman amice. I do agree, only bottom shelf Rum should be used for it, never use the "good" stuff. Anything better than the "Captain" should be sipped by itself.

Vires et Honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: M.IVL.SEVERVS
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 5:07 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] CUBA LIBRE


Severus Paulino omnibusque sal.

Just for the record, it's cuba libre, amice. I agree with your dad: only barbarians will mix soda pops with good quality spirits, which happen to be almost sacred...

Vale, et valete optime,

M.IVL.SEVERVS

--
_______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.

Powered by Outblaze


SPONSORED LINKS Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
Fall of the roman empire The roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42327 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: On warriorhood and other folks...
Salve Piperbarbe,

Gratias ages, amice. Tu poenas pulchros scribis. (Thank you my friend. You write beautiful poems.)

Vires et Honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
Miles - Legio III Cyrenaica
www.northerncrane.net
----- Original Message -----
From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com ; NR: Arts n Sciences
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 10:50 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] On warriorhood and other folks...


Valetudo quod fortuna omnes;

As I sit and think of some things in my life, my thoughts turn to my
time in military uniform, to the men and women with whom I served, to
the long line stretching back before the dawn of recorded history, to
my wife's service, to that of men in my family - those who returned
and those who remained forever on or near the field of battle.

These thoughts were brough to the fore by the recent passing of a
hero, CPT James M. Burt, USA (Ret.) July 18, 1917 - February 15, 2006

Captain Burt was awarded the Medal of Honor, by the United States, for
his action during the struggle over Aachen during the Battle of the
Bulge. He was also awarded 3 Purple Hearts for wounds received in
battle.

As a young cadet at Norwich, the Military College of Vermont, in the
fall of 1975, I had the chance to speak with him for a few minutes at
a reception following a VJ Day memorial service.

What he told me when I evinced my honor at meeting him was, basically,
that he did nothing special. He did his duty, as any man should.

Here is the link to his citation: http://www.medalofhonor.com/JamesBurt.htm

I am forever proud of having made his acquaintence.

Gods Bless and Keep Such men.

On Those Who Bore the Burden - 11 November 2001 CE

To those who have, the Burden borne
For Folk and Land, and Honor's sake
We give our thanks, on Holy Day
Remembrance of, the Duty done

In cold and rain, through coal black night
In heat and wind, neath furnace sun
The Warrior, is always there
To stand and watch, o'er Home and Hearth

When bugles blare, sounding the Charge
They go to fight, and perhaps, die
Beating back fear, and going forth
Tis duty done, tis duty done

And if they fall, in faring forth
They're laid to rest, by friend or foe
With solemn nod, and solemn word
And then, perhaps, with solemn Call

After Duty, is fairly done
They venture Home, to Kin embrace
Sometimes to cheers, sometimes quiet
This lessens not, their Honored Name

And in their work, after service
They still guard weal, by building lives
By building homes, and families
Continuing, continuing

We who live free, because of them
Who sacrificed, and bled, and wept
Who duty did, and honor gained
Recall their Deeds, recall their Names

To those who have, the Burden borne
For Folk and Land, and Honor's sake
We give our thanks, on Holy Day
Remembrance of, the Duty done

I also like to think of those many, many others, who stay at home,
making it possible for all of us to be there at the front...

To All Who Serve - 15 September 2001 CE

Warrior stands, twixt home and foe
The shining edge, of Tribal Might
Bearing the brunt, of duty's load
His blood and bone, is safety's ward

Under Land Bond, he Steading guards
Under Kin Oath, he Hearth defends
Wrecking vengeance, stopping attack
Community's fist, community's shield

Behind him stands, a long broad line
Seamstress, cobbler, armorer, smith
Farmer, baker, brewer and cook
Teamster, joiner, all Trades and Crafts

Without the Folk, no duty starts
Without the Folk, no arms to bear
Without the Folk, no meals to eat
Without the Folk, no shirts to don

Those who, do stay, within the garth
To build and sow, to sew and teach
Give to the edge, a purpose true
And welcome home, once strife is done

Each sword, does shield, a thousand folk
Some aware of, the Burden borne
By warriors, who do well serve,
But not alone, all work serves too

For without Folk, what is a man
But creature poor, and sore bereft
Of Clan and Hearth, of Homely things
Provided by, their efforts good

And so I say, to those who would
Take up the Sword, strap on the Shield
And find that no, Warband will take
Build up the Home, Build up the Folk

These precious things, made by your hands
Your toothsome foods and goodly drink
Your weapons bright and warwains strong
Give tools and might, to those who guard

For you who work, do serve Folk well
There is Honor, in scrape of rake
in hammer's swing, and steaming pot
In all these things, is Lifeworth, too

=========================================
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poet

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
"Skaldic Pebble - a 40 poem sampler" now available
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42328 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: On warriorhood and other folks...
A. Apollonius M. Cassio omnibusque sal.

> Gratias ages, amice. Tu poenas pulchros scribis.
> (Thank you my friend. You write beautiful poems.)

Poema non poena a Venatore facta est, ut puto! ;)



___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Photos – NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 8p a photo http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42329 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Do ex-Boni drink wine from lead cups?
A. Apollonius T. Octavio omnibusque sal.

> Why do you insist on calling the Libra Alliance "the
> Libra party"? It is
> not, has never been and will in all probability
> never be a political
> party.

I call it that because in my view it is a party, in
the sense that it is an association with political
objectives. I don't accept your assertion that a party
must be:

> * Organised (Leadership, internal rules)
> * United (Party line, mutual support)
> * Politically focussed (Not seldom to the exclusion
> of actual issues)

There were groups in the British Parliament in the
nineteenth century which had none of these features
but which are described by all historians as parties.

I think my message made it perfectly clear that I do
not consider any of the current parties particularly
organized or monolithic - in fact I think I said that
quite specifically. My point was simply that if you
join something which looks like a political party you
can't complain if people assume you're a member of a
political party.

The fact that you have frequently felt the need to
write to this forum explaining in detail why Libra is
not a political party proves the point: it is not at
all obvious to the casual observer that it is not a
political party, or else you wouldn't have to say so.

In any case, I don't much care what you call it in
English. What matters is that it is, like the 'Boni'
and other such groups, something the Romans never had,
would never have had, and would probably have regarded
as a conjuratio contra rem publicam.



___________________________________________________________
Win a BlackBerry device from O2 with Yahoo!. Enter now. http://www.yahoo.co.uk/blackberry
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42330 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
A. Apollonius C. Buteoni omnibusque sal.

Sounds like an excellent and long-overdue project! I
shall mosey along to the e-mail list to see whether I
can help.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42331 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare Regarding Edictum dated Feb 18
A. Apollonius Cn. Lentulo omnibusque sal.

Well, I won't insist on a long discussion, but from
what you say I must say I think Professor Zlinszky is
not in agreement with the bulk of modern scholarship.
It sounds like his analysis is very much based on the
abstract political philosophy of Cicero and later,
imperial writers, and not very much in accordance with
the historical reality of the republican constitution.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42332 From: Steven Harris Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: A few religious questions
Salvete omnes!

This is my first post to the group as I have been lurking for a
couple of weeks.
I have been very impressed with this thread and the way that it has
developed.

My small contribution is that aspects of Christianity have been
blended into several religions. There are folk religions in central
and south america that have blended tribal African beliefs with
Catholic hagiography. I understand that Hindus have no problem
accepting Jesus and Mary into their pantheon either. Finally there is
a curious asian mix in the Cao Dai religion http://www.caodai.org ,
which also includes Christianity.

It seems that synthesis is possible provided that it is called
something else than Christianity.

Regards

Steve.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42333 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: On warriorhood and other folks...
Mea culpa - No Latin spell check ;)
----- Original Message -----
From: A. Apollonius Cordus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 8:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] On warriorhood and other folks...


A. Apollonius M. Cassio omnibusque sal.

> Gratias ages, amice. Tu poenas pulchros scribis.
> (Thank you my friend. You write beautiful poems.)

Poema non poena a Venatore facta est, ut puto! ;)



___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Photos - NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 8p a photo http://uk.photos.yahoo.com


SPONSORED LINKS Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
Fall of the roman empire The roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42334 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
> Lovely... can't wait to see the discussions when it will be to outline the
> scopes of th association, or the role of the various magistrates in the
> check and balance system and so on and so forth and the cries of censorship
> when the "editors" (why we do *elect* a magister aerenarius when then a
> Consul can *nominate* scribes to basically meddle with the website?) will
> "supervise" the contents...

How eager you are to find fault with anything the Consul does, even
something as wholly positive as this.

The Magister Aranearius approved that edict as well; note the statement
at the top that it was issued jointly. The wikimagisters
*are* Scribae of the Magister Aranearius.

You can either contribute, or sit back and whinge as others build
something useful.

Vale, Octavius.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42335 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: CUBA LIBRE
Captain? Only barbarians drink Captain Morgan! A well-informed drunkard & mixologist (such as myself), knows that the only rum worthy of the palate of a true bibber is Barbancourt Rum from Haiti (land of Vou-doun) usually the 8 year old or perhaps Black Seal. Not only is it grand for sipping or mixing a Navy Grog or Zombie but excellent for pouring libations to Ianus-Legba, the opener of the Ways.
Captain!? ERCULE!! You might as well use vodka to mix a French 75.

FGA

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Perez <senseiphil@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 08:06:28 -0500
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] CUBA LIBRE


Salve,

Ahumm... It's a Cuba Libre. Take it from a Cuban-American-Nova Roman amice. I do
agree, only bottom shelf Rum should be used for it, never use the "good" stuff.
Anything better than the "Captain" should be sipped by itself.

Vires et Honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: M.IVL.SEVERVS
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 5:07 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] CUBA LIBRE


Severus Paulino omnibusque sal.

Just for the record, it's cuba libre, amice. I agree with your dad: only
barbarians will mix soda pops with good quality spirits, which happen to be
almost sacred...

Vale, et valete optime,

M.IVL.SEVERVS

--
_______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.

Powered by Outblaze


SPONSORED LINKS Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
Fall of the roman empire The roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Yahoo! Groups Links






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42336 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
Q. Suetonius Paulinus sums up the uses and abuses of the term
"Judeo-Christian" well, but he uses without comment another well
understood collective that _doesn't_ exclude Muslims: "Abrahamic
religions". All three of the exclusiDcvist monotheisms recognize Abraham
as one of their spiritual ancestors. At that, the Muslims beat us to it
in developing an inclusive term: "People of The Book", since all three
recognize the Torah as sacred scripture. The Christians and Muslims
simply add later testaments, the New Testament and Koran, which in their
view(s) amend and supercede the Torah but do not annul its sacred nature.

-- Publius Livius Triarius
mka Dick Eney
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42337 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: A few religious questions
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Maior wrote:

> M. Hortensia Sex. Pontio Pilato Barbato spd;
> my apologies!
> Try and imagine if a Muslim used the term "Christano-Muslim"...& you
> would be thinking 'hey I don't believe in Muhammad, don't believe or
> read the Qur'an, eat pork, -why's he including me?' (but you'd get
> killed if you objected;-)

Not if he was, for instance, a Sufi. The murderous fanatics are making so
much noise right now that we're too often losing sight of the relaxed and
tolerant majority of Muslims, to say nothing of their mystic and
intellectual elements.

-- Publius Livius Triarius
mka Dick Eney
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42338 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
*stretches*

On 3/1/06, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> wrote:
>
> How eager you are to find fault with anything the Consul does, even
> something as wholly positive as this.


Is it? :) don't you think that defining what Nova Roma is and publicize it
to the world, as the wiki eventually will do if succesful, is a matter that
goes slightly beyond the power of a consul, 4 editors with censorial power
and a bunch of people with time and energies enough to write the wiki
article, but should be given, if necessary, to teh Senate or to the people
as a whole thro a law?

No, I suppose you don't.

The Magister Aranearius approved that edict as well; note the statement
> at the top that it was issued jointly. The wikimagisters
> *are* Scribae of the Magister Aranearius.


And? I don't think the magister araenarius and his scribae have authority
over the contents of the website, besides its maintenance and layout. Nor
the consul.

I would have liked the senate to delberate if we needed a wiki and the
guidelines for its content editing, am I allowed to say that, or am I..
whinging? :) But hey, I suppose if one can create an Augur, can also decide
on minor things as an official wiki.


You can either contribute, or sit back and whinge as others build
> something useful.


yeah yeah yeah, who points out an opinion automatically whinge... but I
suppose your signature says all about your consideration towards people
voicing their opinions, doesn't it? :) Allow me a chuckle :) But thank you
for having made me learn a new term.. whinge... sounds funny.

DCF


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42339 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: CUBA LIBRE
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Phil Perez wrote:

> Salve,
>
> Ahumm... It's a Cuba Libre. Take it from a Cuban-American-Nova Roman
> amice. I do agree, only bottom shelf Rum should be used for it, never
> use the "good" stuff. Anything better than the "Captain" should be
> sipped by itself.

How many of us are old enough to remember that cartoon in the New
Yorker, just after the Bay of Pings, featuring a bartender indignantly
asking a customer: "A Cuba Libre? What are you, some kind of trouble
maker?"

-- Publius Livius Triarius
ducking and running...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42340 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus wrote:

> Is it? :) don't you think that defining what Nova Roma is and publicize it...
> ...but should be given, if necessary, to teh Senate or to the people
> as a whole thro a law?
>
> No, I suppose you don't.

Of course not. If there had to be a law for every change to the web site
then we'd only have about ten pages in total.

> And? I don't think the magister araenarius and his scribae have authority
> over the contents of the website, besides its maintenance and layout. Nor
> the consul.

Eight years of precedent disagree with you. The Magister (or Curator)
has always had the authority and ability to make changes to the contents,
the layout, and the software; the only change that was ever taken to the
Senate was the move to a new ISP in 2000 - and the Curator of that time
was offered the opportunity to veto if he chose (he did not).

What we're doing now is moving to a system where it is far easier to make
changes, and to have content come from persons who may be skilled writers
but are unfamiliar with how web sites work.

We've been working on this for two months, and sought the concurrence of
the Consuls and the Censores; this was a courtesy rather than a necessity.

> yeah yeah yeah, who points out an opinion automatically whinge... but I
> suppose your signature says all about your consideration towards people
> voicing their opinions, doesn't it? :)

Those were the last words of a martyr, hanged by the government of the
United States for the crime of holding a meeting. I've stood at the
grave of August Spies; August Spies was a hero of mine; and you,
Domitius Constantinus Fuscus, are no August Spies.

Vale, Octavius.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42341 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: CUBA LIBRE
Salve

Well here in the Subura there are plenty of barbarian immigrants like me and we do like the Captain :-) I am adopted by a patrician family but I'm still a barbarian at heart. Watch out amice or we'll make you walk the plank - after a few Cuba Libres of course!

Vires et Honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] CUBA LIBRE


Captain? Only barbarians drink Captain Morgan! A well-informed drunkard & mixologist (such as myself), knows that the only rum worthy of the palate of a true bibber is Barbancourt Rum from Haiti (land of Vou-doun) usually the 8 year old or perhaps Black Seal. Not only is it grand for sipping or mixing a Navy Grog or Zombie but excellent for pouring libations to Ianus-Legba, the opener of the Ways.
Captain!? ERCULE!! You might as well use vodka to mix a French 75.

FGA

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Perez <senseiphil@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 08:06:28 -0500
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] CUBA LIBRE


Salve,

Ahumm... It's a Cuba Libre. Take it from a Cuban-American-Nova Roman amice. I do
agree, only bottom shelf Rum should be used for it, never use the "good" stuff.
Anything better than the "Captain" should be sipped by itself.

Vires et Honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: M.IVL.SEVERVS
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 5:07 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] CUBA LIBRE


Severus Paulino omnibusque sal.

Just for the record, it's cuba libre, amice. I agree with your dad: only
barbarians will mix soda pops with good quality spirits, which happen to be
almost sacred...

Vale, et valete optime,

M.IVL.SEVERVS

--
_______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.

Powered by Outblaze


SPONSORED LINKS Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
Fall of the roman empire The roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Yahoo! Groups Links






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
Fall of the roman empire The roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42342 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: On warriorhood and other folks...
Valetudo Philippus;

Having little facility with Latin, beyond knowing who to ask for advice,
I appreciate your sentiment ,-)

Lucky is the poet well-read in their lifetime.

=========================================
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus

Religio Septentrionalis - Poet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42343 From: caiusmoraviusbrutus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
Perhaps we should just use the terms "us" and "them"!


Caius Moravius Brutus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, dicconf <dicconf@...> wrote:
>
>
> Q. Suetonius Paulinus sums up the uses and abuses of the term
> "Judeo-Christian" well, but he uses without comment another well
> understood collective that _doesn't_ exclude Muslims: "Abrahamic
> religions". All three of the exclusiDcvist monotheisms recognize
Abraham
> as one of their spiritual ancestors. At that, the Muslims beat us
to it
> in developing an inclusive term: "People of The Book", since all
three
> recognize the Torah as sacred scripture. The Christians and
Muslims
> simply add later testaments, the New Testament and Koran, which in
their
> view(s) amend and supercede the Torah but do not annul its sacred
nature.
>
> -- Publius Livius Triarius
> mka Dick Eney
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42344 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Salvete -

On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:07:13AM -0600, Matt Hucke wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus wrote:
>
> > yeah yeah yeah, who points out an opinion automatically whinge... but I
> > suppose your signature says all about your consideration towards people
> > voicing their opinions, doesn't it? :)
>
> Those were the last words of a martyr, hanged by the government of the
> United States for the crime of holding a meeting. I've stood at the
> grave of August Spies; August Spies was a hero of mine; and you,
> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus, are no August Spies.

I also note that, despite the prodigious quantities of verbiage that
Fuscus pours onto this list - all either negative or insulting, to the
best of my recollection - his comprehension of the written word remains
abysmal. This, of course, is par for the course; he doesn't need to
*understand* the issues in order to take a stand against them.

August Spies' words illustrated his commitment to the principle of free
speech, even though it had cost him his life. Octavius, Callidus, and
the others involved in this project are offering the citizens of Nova
Roma the ability to describe it from their own, unique perspectives; D.
Fuscus is objecting to this on the grounds of... well, it's an issue
that he can voice opposition to and thus shine [1] as a lawyer.

Whose actions show greater consideration for the voicing of opinions,
here? Octavius et al, who have expended thir effort to bring this ability
to Nova Roma, or Fuscus, who is determined to strangle it as soon as it
appears?

> "The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
> voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887



[1] Much like John Randolph's evaluation of Edward Livingston, although
the "splendid abilities" part is notably absent.

Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Ridentem dicere verum, quid vetat?
What prohibits us to tell the truth laughing (through a joke)?
-- Horace, "Satirae"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42345 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
A. Apollonius Domitio Constantino omnibusque sal.

You know that I'm not one to overlook possible
problems of accountability and proper procedure, but I
think in this case we can expect these issues to be
ironed out as the project progresses. Obviously the
possible problems you raise are real enough, and some
mechanisms will have to be developed to address them;
and, like any project, this one has the potential to
go wrong. But it also has the potential to make our
presence on the internet vastly more efficient and
friendly for visitors, citizens, and magistrates.

The consul and the magister are not putting this
forward as a finished product: it's a project at the
beginning of its development, and it's not going to
replace the official website any time soon or without
further consultation. In my view the best thing is for
those who are interested in the project, or indeed
worried about how it might develop, to join in (as
we've all been invited to do) and make our views known.



___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Photos – NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 8p a photo http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42346 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: CUBA LIBRE
In a message dated 3/1/2006 6:59:22 AM Pacific Standard Time,
PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... writes:
A well-informed drunkard & mixologist (such as myself), knows that the only
rum worthy of the palate of a true bibber is Barbancourt Rum from Haiti (land
of Vou-doun) usually the 8 year old or perhaps Black Seal. Not only is it
grand for sipping or mixing a Navy Grog or Zombie but excellent for pouring
libations to Ianus-Legba, the opener of the Ways.
Please don't mention Rum. It's the moring after 'Fat Tuesday"....

Q Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42347 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Valetudo omnes;

I have gone to the Nova Roma Wiki project area and have enlisted.

I will write an article on the Society of Cooks and Brewers.

=========================================
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias, Diribitor et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poet

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42348 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: BARBANCOURT
Severus Venator omnibusque sal.

I am really glad, O Venator amice, to find out that a superb poet as you are, is also a real rhum connoiseur... I agree with you about the magnificent quality of Barbancourt, although I know a few other rhums also worthy of the palate of a true bibber...

Vale, et valete optime,

M•IVL•SEVERVS

--
_______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.

Powered by Outblaze
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42349 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, caiusmoraviusbrutus wrote:

> Perhaps we should just use the terms "us" and "them"!

But what we're looking for is a term for "all of us except maybe Hindus
and Buddhists and Shintoists and Taoists,.."

-- Piblius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42350 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: CUBA LIBRE
Salve Maxime,

It could be much worse amice. You could have been drinking Tequila - now that is just vile stuff. I'm surprised the suicide rate isn't higher in Mexico, I felt like doing myself in the morning after a "Sunrise" Party back in college, the hang over from Tequila is probably the worst in the world. 32 years later I can still taste in my mouth the effects of it. I've never drunk it since. Tequila can probably be used to remove or thin paint out if Turpentine isn't available :)

Vires et Honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: QFabiusMaxmi@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] CUBA LIBRE


In a message dated 3/1/2006 6:59:22 AM Pacific Standard Time,
PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... writes:
A well-informed drunkard & mixologist (such as myself), knows that the only
rum worthy of the palate of a true bibber is Barbancourt Rum from Haiti (land
of Vou-doun) usually the 8 year old or perhaps Black Seal. Not only is it
grand for sipping or mixing a Navy Grog or Zombie but excellent for pouring
libations to Ianus-Legba, the opener of the Ways.
Please don't mention Rum. It's the moring after 'Fat Tuesday"....

Q Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
Fall of the roman empire The roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42351 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: TEQUILA
Severus Philippo omnibusque sal.

It seems to me, Philippus amice, that you went just too far when talking about tequila. Everybody is entitled to have preferences, I agree, but nobody should talk with such authority, unless having the real knowledge. Now, being a Mexican who was born in Jalisco, the state where tequila first came to the world, I feel really aggraviated by your blunt remarks...
Believe me, I have tried really vile stuff, including some rhums and whiskies, but I know about tequila, and I mean real tequila, not the stuff sold to tourists, the kind you find in most places in the United States.
Good tequila is another thing, amice. Real connoiseurs appreciate it in the same dimension they appreciate superb cognac, for instance. I hope I can offer you, in the near future, at least a sip of authentic tequila, so you can know what you're talking about... and you won't wake up with a horrible hangover the next day!

Vale, et valete optime,

M•IVL•SEVERVS

--
_______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.

Powered by Outblaze
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42352 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
Salve

I agree!!!

I received my calendars a few days ago and they are just GREAT.

Thanks for all the hard work to get these produced.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Kirsteen Wright"
<kirsteen.falconsfan@...> wrote:
>
> On 2/28/06, Peter Bird <p.bird@...> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Servili et salvete omnes -
> >
> > I've had my calendar for some time and it's superb! Not only is
it most
> > informative, but it is elegant also. Congratulations to the
designers.
> >
> > Sextus Pontius Pilatus Barbatus
>
>
> Yes I agree It's beautiful. I hope they continue to produce them
for next
> year
>
> Merula
>
> --
> Chaos, confusion, disorder - my work here is done
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42353 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
M. Hortensia Bruto Triarioque spd;
Actually I prefer, "Jewish"! I don't have an us vs. them
mentality. And Abrhamic faiths isn't really helpful to my mind as
where does it put Zoroaster and for it is the one that first
developed concepts of heaven, hell, angels, and the last judgement.
So it is & should be the acknowledged font of many 'core' beliefs of
Christians, Muslims, Jews etc...

And again apologies on 'they'd kill you' I meant Christians! Who
did in the past, Jews had not the voice to object to anything said
in their name, much less the appropriation of their tradition.
Sister religions is fine as it implies equality.

bene valete
Marca Hortensia Maior
>
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, caiusmoraviusbrutus wrote:
>
> > Perhaps we should just use the terms "us" and "them"!
>
> But what we're looking for is a term for "all of us except maybe
Hindus
> and Buddhists and Shintoists and Taoists,.."
>
> -- Piblius Livius Triarius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42354 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Salve

On 3/1/06, Benjamin A. Okopnik <ben@...> wrote:
>
> I also note that, despite the prodigious quantities of verbiage that
> Fuscus pours onto this list - all either negative or insulting, to the
> best of my recollection - his comprehension of the written word remains
> abysmal. This, of course, is par for the course; he doesn't need to
> *understand* the issues in order to take a stand against them.
>


Then I'll count myself lucky that your memory is as good as your ability of
being civil with somone who has just expressed his opinion on a Nova Roman
matter in a style that maybe you didn't appreciate, but with no insult to
anyone, originally.

It's very ironic, or shall we say totally hipocritical, to protest about
someone's alleged (please, bring forward your examples, to my memory I can
remember 2 people I've openly insulted puposefully and without apologizing
afterwards) attitude at insulting resolving to insulting yourself.

What I said originally is that I doubted a Consul or a webmaster or a minor
number of citizens have the right to define such crucial things as what Nova
Roma stand for and publicize it to the world. There is a subtle difference
between arranging and re-wording contents and defining those contents, and
anyone who had to deal with wikipedia, as I did, knows perfectly that in the
moment you place people defining something that is much based on personal
interpretation, as in this case, you run the risk of having those people,
purposefully or by chance, that thing.

If you didn't understand this issue, then I'd reconsider who is indeed the
one having as, as you said an "abysmal" comprehension of the written word.
Incidentally, when you will be able to understand half of a fourth of what
I've written above had it been worded in Italian and express one tenth of a
reasonable point in my languange, then I'll accept critics about my
comprehension coming by you.



> Whose actions show greater consideration for the voicing of opinions,
> here? Octavius et al, who have expended thir effort to bring this ability
> to Nova Roma, or Fuscus, who is determined to strangle it as soon as it
>
appears?
>

*lol* considering I started my "political" activity in Nova Roma fighting
(and getting a load of insults and treaths for that) for the freedom of
speech threathened by the menance of using the Blasphemy decretum, that
sounds pretty funny.

Ah, sorry, forgot your failing memory indeed :)

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Former Tribunus Plebis (MMDCCLVIII a. U. c.)
Former Aedilis Urbis Iterum (MMDCCLVII & MMDCCLVIII a. U. c.)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42355 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: BARBANCOURT
Ave!

On 3/1/06, M•IVL•SEVERVS <marcusiuliusseverus@...> wrote:
> Severus Venator omnibusque sal.
>
> I am really glad, O Venator amice, to find out that a superb poet as you are, is also a real rhum connoiseur... I agree with you about the magnificent quality of Barbancourt, although I know a few other rhums also worthy of the palate of a true bibber...
>
> Vale, et valete optime,
>
> M•IVL•SEVERVS
>

Umm, Rum, da dum, da dum!

I did not comment on the liquid refreshment debate, though...

I do enjoy a Cuba Libre from time to time, I'll use a "house brand"
when mixing thusly.

My favorite rum, though is Cruzan - Blackstrap Rum - from St. Croix in
the US Virgin Islands. I like to sip it from a brandy snifter, with
just a little splash of soda water. Good rum should be ebon and
opaque, just like good ale ,-)

=========================================
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poet

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/


http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42356 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 08:22:50PM +0100, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus wrote:
> Salve
>
> On 3/1/06, Benjamin A. Okopnik <ben@...> wrote:
> >
> > I also note that, despite the prodigious quantities of verbiage that
> > Fuscus pours onto this list - all either negative or insulting, to the
> > best of my recollection - his comprehension of the written word remains
> > abysmal. This, of course, is par for the course; he doesn't need to
> > *understand* the issues in order to take a stand against them.
> >
>
>
> Then I'll count myself lucky that your memory is as good as your ability of
> being civil with somone who has just expressed his opinion on a Nova Roman
> matter in a style that maybe you didn't appreciate, but with no insult to
> anyone, originally.

My ability to be civil with anyone I care to be civil to is unimpaired,
thanks. It's simply that you deserve no such consideration.

All the rest of your /ad hominem/ nonsense has been elided, since I'm
uninterested in wasting time on actually talking _to_ you rather than
pointing out your attempts to destroy what you could never create.


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Alea iacta est!
Let the dice fly!
-- Julius Caesar, at the Rubicon
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42357 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Salve,

You are right. The stuff I tried was most probably the crap sold really cheap. It was so vile the next morning that I never tried any ever Tequila again. Mind you, I have had gut-rot booze before. Everything from the stuff the hillbillies in Georgia and Kentucky make at home and call "Whiskey" to the Hard Cider of New Hampshire's White Mountain Boys (New England Hillbillies) near where I live make and nothing ever made me feel as bad the next morning as that Tequila.

Vires et honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: M.IVL.SEVERVS
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 1:57 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] TEQUILA


Severus Philippo omnibusque sal.

It seems to me, Philippus amice, that you went just too far when talking about tequila. Everybody is entitled to have preferences, I agree, but nobody should talk with such authority, unless having the real knowledge. Now, being a Mexican who was born in Jalisco, the state where tequila first came to the world, I feel really aggraviated by your blunt remarks...
Believe me, I have tried really vile stuff, including some rhums and whiskies, but I know about tequila, and I mean real tequila, not the stuff sold to tourists, the kind you find in most places in the United States.
Good tequila is another thing, amice. Real connoiseurs appreciate it in the same dimension they appreciate superb cognac, for instance. I hope I can offer you, in the near future, at least a sip of authentic tequila, so you can know what you're talking about... and you won't wake up with a horrible hangover the next day!

Vale, et valete optime,

M.IVL.SEVERVS

--
_______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.

Powered by Outblaze


SPONSORED LINKS Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
Fall of the roman empire The roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42358 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Salve

On 3/1/06, Benjamin A. Okopnik <ben@...> wrote:
>
> All the rest of your /ad hominem/ nonsense has been elided, since I'm
> uninterested in wasting time on actually talking _to_ you rather than
> pointing out your attempts to destroy what you could never create.
>

:) Ah, how easy to run away when called to back up with evidences the
inconsistance of your words, isn't it? :)

DCF


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42359 From: P.M. Albucius Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare Regarding Edictum dated Feb 18
P. Memmius Albucius Consuli omnibusque s.d.


Wise decision, Consul, which honors you.



Gratias ac vale (-te),


P. Memmius Albucius



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus"
<tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> EDICTUM CONSULARE
>
> Regarding Edictum dated February 18, 2006.
>
> Ex Officio
>
> I hereby withdraw my previous edictum regarding Flavius Vedius
> Germanicus as an Augur of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42360 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Off Topic August Spies
Salve Romans

"We urgently call upon the wage-class to arm itself in order to be
able to put forth against the exploiters such an argument which
alone can be effective - violence." August Spies

"If we do not soon bestir ourselves for a bloody revolution, we
cannot leave anything to our children but poverty and slavery.
Therefore, prepare yourselves! In all quietness, prepare yourselves
for the Revolution!" August Spies

As a student of history I acknowledge that August Spies execution
and the other executions in reaction to the deaths at Haymarket was
a miscarriage of justice and nothing less than judicial murder.

But the continuing reverence some have for anarchist and socialist
in the face of the historic record is mystifying.

Unless you count the dead, Socialism, Nazism and Communism are
absolute and totally murderous failures.

50 million died in WWII as a result of the German version of
socialism and 100 million ( conservative estimate ) died because of
communism.


Heroes should be like Cincinnatus and Washington, not purveyors of
death and the destruction of millions.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus






--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus wrote:
>
> > Is it? :) don't you think that defining what Nova Roma is and
publicize it...
> > ...but should be given, if necessary, to teh Senate or to the
people
> > as a whole thro a law?
> >
> > No, I suppose you don't.
>
> Of course not. If there had to be a law for every change to the
web site
> then we'd only have about ten pages in total.
>
> > And? I don't think the magister araenarius and his scribae have
authority
> > over the contents of the website, besides its maintenance and
layout. Nor
> > the consul.
>
> Eight years of precedent disagree with you. The Magister (or
Curator)
> has always had the authority and ability to make changes to the
contents,
> the layout, and the software; the only change that was ever taken
to the
> Senate was the move to a new ISP in 2000 - and the Curator of that
time
> was offered the opportunity to veto if he chose (he did not).
>
> What we're doing now is moving to a system where it is far easier
to make
> changes, and to have content come from persons who may be skilled
writers
> but are unfamiliar with how web sites work.
>
> We've been working on this for two months, and sought the
concurrence of
> the Consuls and the Censores; this was a courtesy rather than a
necessity.
>
> > yeah yeah yeah, who points out an opinion automatically
whinge... but I
> > suppose your signature says all about your consideration towards
people
> > voicing their opinions, doesn't it? :)
>
> Those were the last words of a martyr, hanged by the government of
the
> United States for the crime of holding a meeting. I've stood at
the
> grave of August Spies; August Spies was a hero of mine; and you,
> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus, are no August Spies.
>
> Vale, Octavius.
>
> --
> hucke@...
> http://www.graveyards.com
>
> "The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
> voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42361 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: CUBA LIBRE
Salve, Maximus.

Did we orgy just a bit too much last night? How about some garlic cheese with bread? Maybe a little salted ham & hard crackers? How about some cheese grits and fried eggs mixed with brains?
Why are you rushing out the vomitorium, my friend?

Aurelianus

-----Original Message-----
From: QFabiusMaxmi@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 12:43:05 EST
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] CUBA LIBRE


In a message dated 3/1/2006 6:59:22 AM Pacific Standard Time,
PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... writes:
A well-informed drunkard & mixologist (such as myself), knows that the only
rum worthy of the palate of a true bibber is Barbancourt Rum from Haiti (land
of Vou-doun) usually the 8 year old or perhaps Black Seal. Not only is it
grand for sipping or mixing a Navy Grog or Zombie but excellent for pouring
libations to Ianus-Legba, the opener of the Ways.
Please don't mention Rum. It's the moring after 'Fat Tuesday"....

Q Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Yahoo! Groups Links






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42362 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: A few religious questions
M. Hortensia Steve spd;
I cannot believe that I forgot about Voudoun, Santeria,
Candomble, etc all the African-Christian religions. What makes
a 'folk' religion? Hmm, it can be seen as a term of dismissal, when
used by scholars. As apposed to what -book religion?
Anyway, there was also the sycretic Christianity-Confucianism of
the Boxer Rebellion in China,
and of course all those 'heresies' of the past:various forms of
Gnosticism, Montanism, Cathars, Albigenses, Waldenses, all coming from
Christianity.

Teixidor makes the point that the supreme god of the Near East Baal
Shaamin, Lord or the Heavens or El the Most High or Creator of the
Earth, called this in Ugarit, had helper gods, intermediaries.
Astarte was called the Name of Baal, Tenit (Tanith) the Face of Baal,
Eshmun the young god, assimilated to Hercules, as well as the youthful
god Melqart. Also the dying god Adonis of Phoenicia.

In his introduction, he finally solves what for me had been a
longstanding question: why were the Syrian/Phonician gods so popular
all over the Empire?
"In these Semitic societies the gods were supposed to look after
their worshippers, and as a result the believers themselves felt a
rather unusual degree of solidarity with thier gods." p. 10 "The
Pagan God" J. Teixidor
The Oriental gods were called in Greek 'theoi epekooi' the ones who
listen to prayers, they were friendly gods.

so that was solved. Fascinating!
bene vale
Marca Hortensia Maior

> My small contribution is that aspects of Christianity have been
> blended into several religions. There are folk religions in central
> and south america that have blended tribal African beliefs with
> Catholic hagiography. I understand that Hindus have no problem
> accepting Jesus and Mary into their pantheon either. Finally there
is
> a curious asian mix in the Cao Dai religion
http://www.caodai.org ,
> which also includes Christianity.
>
> It seems that synthesis is possible provided that it is called
> something else than Christianity.
>
> Regards
>
> Steve.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42363 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: On warriorhood and other folks...
> A. Tullia Scholastica A. Apollonio M. Cassio quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
> bonae uoluntatis s.p.d.
>
> A. Apollonius M. Cassio omnibusque sal.
>
>> > Gratias ages, amice. Tu poenas pulchros scribis.
>> > (Thank you my friend. You write beautiful poems.)
>
> Poema non poena a Venatore facta est, ut puto! ;)
>
> ATS: Ne dicam nec poenam nec poema genus masculinum esse...poema,
> poematis, n.; poena, poenae, f. Macte, autem, Cassi amice, quia Latine
> scribis!
>
> Valete.
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42364 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
> A. Tullia Scholastica P. Liuio Triario quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae
> uoluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
>
> Q. Suetonius Paulinus sums up the uses and abuses of the term
> "Judeo-Christian" well, but he uses without comment another well
> understood collective that _doesn't_ exclude Muslims: "Abrahamic
> religions". All three of the exclusiDcvist monotheisms recognize Abraham
> as one of their spiritual ancestors. At that, the Muslims beat us to it
> in developing an inclusive term: "People of The Book,"since all three
> recognize the Torah as sacred scripture. The Christians and Muslims
> simply add later testaments, the New Testament and Koran, which in their
> view(s) amend and supercede the Torah but do not annul its sacred nature.
>
> ATS: There are, however, other faiths which employ sacred scriptures as
> well, so it is hardly definitive to call the Abrahamic religions ÂŒPeople of
> the Book.¹ The Sikhs use the Granth Sahib, and the Hindus use the Vedas, the
> latter of which long precede the Koran and the NT, and, according to the
> hard-copy information available to me at present, the Torah as well. The
> millions of adherents of these two Indic religions seem more likely to refer
> to one or the other of these scriptures as Œthe book¹ (granted, that there are
> four Vedas) than they are to the Torah or the OT, NT, etc.
>
> -- Publius Livius Triarius
> mka Dick Eney
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42365 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
M.Hortensia A. Tullae spd;
well said amica! And let's not forget the Gathas of
Zarathustra and Zend-Avesta. I think the Gathas are about co-eval
linguistically with the Vedas. Can you read them with your Sanskrit?
vale
Maior


The
> > millions of adherents of these two Indic religions seem more
likely to refer
> > to one or the other of these scriptures as Œthe book¹ (granted,
that there are
> > four Vedas) than they are to the Torah or the OT, NT, etc.
> >
> > --> >
> > Vale, et ualete,
> >
> > A. Tullia Scholastica
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42366 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: RENVNTIATIO PRAESCRIPTORIS ACADEMIAE THVLES
RENVNTIATIO PRAESCRIPTORIS II ACADEMIAE THVLES

ANNOUNCEMENT BY
the Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.

Pleno suo Quarto, Consilium Academiae Thules decrevit aliis titulis
terminisque Latinis intra Academiam Thules uti.

During its Fourth Plenum the Consilium Academia Thules (The BoD of
Academia Thules) has decided to use a different set of Latin titles
and terms within the Academia Thules.

Tituli verbaque publicae utilitatis infra scripta sunt:
Below are those titles and terms that are of public interest:

"Genus Doctrinae" in "Facultas" (pl., "Facultates")
Genus Doctrinae to Facultas (pl. Facultates):

"Historiae" in "Historiae"
Historiae to Historiae

"Religionis" in "Theologiae"
Religionis to Theologiae

"Lex Romana" in "Juris"
Lex Romana to Juris

"Philosophiae" in "Philosophiae"
Philosophiae to Philosophiae

"Latini" in "Litterarum Latinarum"
Latini to Litterarum Latinarum

"Novae Romae" in "Novae Romae"
Novae Romae to Novae Romae

"Archeologicae" in "Archaeologiae"
Archeologicae to Archaeologiae

"Artis Militaris" in "Rei Militaris"
Artis Militaris to Rei Militaris

"officina" in "procuratio" (pl., "procurationes")
officina to procuratio (pl. procurationes)

"caput officinae" in "praefectus procurationis"
caput officinae to praefectus procurationis

"aula discipulorum" in "aula studentium"
aula discipulorum to aula studentium

"claustrum praeceptorum" in "claustrum academicum"
claustrum praeceptorum to claustrum academicum

"questiones et responsiones" in "quaesita responsa"
questiones et responsiones to quaesita responsa

"syllabus cooperationes" in "index inceptorum collaborationis"
syllabus cooperationes to index inceptorum collaborationis

"caput generis doctrinae" in "decanus facultatis" (pl., "decani facultatis")
caput generis doctrinae to decanus facultatis (pl. decani facultatis)

"consuasor advocatus" in "consultor"
consuasor advocatus to consultor

"consultor" in "consultor rationarius"
consultor to consultor rationarius

"scriba ad res externas" in "scriba a necessitudinibus publicis"
scriba ad res externas to scriba anecessitudinibus publicis

"scriba fiscalis" in "scriba aerarius"
scriba fiscalis to scriba aerarius

"triumviratum academiae" in "triumviratus academiae"
triumviratum academiae to triumviratus academiae

"procurator academiae" in "rector"
procurator academiae to rector

"libellus" in "libellus" (pl., "libelli")
libellus to libellus (pl. libelli)

"propositio" in "thesis" (pl., "theses")
propositio to thesis (pl. theses)

"baccalaureus" in "baccalaureatus"
baccalaureus to baccalaureatus

"scriba araniae" in "scriba aranearius"
scriba araniae to scriba aranearius

"scriba secretarius" in "scriba rectorius"
scriba secretarius to scriba rectorius

Infra sunt scripta designationes quae usque ad diem quintum decimum
(XV) mensis Ianuari MMDCCLX (2007) valebunt. Quidam collegarum
nostrorum nondum nobiscum collocuti sunt, quare Academia Thules cum
eis privatim agere consilium cepit.

Below are the appointments until the the 15th of January 2760 (2007).
Some co-workers in the Academia Thules still need to be spoken with
and the Academia Thules plan to have discussions with them privately.

Ex iure mihi Praescriptori Academiae Thules Regula Academiae Thules
mandato hos usque ad diem quintum decimum (XV) mensis Ianuari MMDCCLX
(2007) iterum magistros officiales Academiae Thules creo:

By the powers invested in me as Praescriptor Academia Thules by the
Regula of the Academia Thules I hereby re-appoint the following
personnel in the Academia Thules until at the latest the 15th of
January 2759 (2006):

A. Gratium Avitum Decanum Facultatis Litterarum Latinarum
A. Gratius Garseius Avitus as Decanus Facultatis Litterarum Latinarum
(Director of the Latin Department)

Aulam Tulliam Scholasticam Praeceptricem Facultatis Litterarum Latinarum
Aula Tullia Scholastica as Praeceptor for Facultas Litterarum
Latinarum (Teacher in LatinDepartment)

Aulum Apollonium Cordum Decanum Facultatis Juris
Aulus Apollonius Cordus as Decanus Facultatis Iuris (Director of the
Law Department)

Marcum Horatium Piscinum Decanum Facultatis Theologiae
Marcus Horatius Piscinus as Decanus Facultatis Theologiae (Director
of the Religio Romana Department)

Gnaeum Salvium Asturem Decanum Facultatis Historicae
Gnaeus Salvius Astur as Decanus Facultatis Historica (Director of the
History Department)

Caium Curium Saturninum Decanum Facultatis Philosophiae
Caius Curius Saturninus as Decanus Facultatis Philosophiae (Director
of the Philosophy Department)

Caium Curium Saturninum Decanum Facultatis Novae Romae
Caius Curius Saturninus as Decanus Facultati Novae Romae (Director of
the Nova Roma Department)

Marcum Minucium Audentem Decanum Facultatis Rei Militari
Marcus Minucius Audens as Decanus Facultatis Rei Militaris (Director
of the Roman Military HistoryDepartment)

Praeterea, titulus Academiae capitis administrandae, C. Curi
Saturninum consentaneo modo a "Procuratore Academiae Thules ad
Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova" in "Rectorem

Further the title of the administrativ leader/CEO of the Academia,
Caius Curius Saturninus, consequently is changed from "Procurator
Academia Thules ad Studia Roman a Antiqua et Nova" to "Rector
Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova", Rector Academia
Thules for short.
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Senator, Censorius et Consularis
Accensus GFBM, Scriba Censoris GEM
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42367 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Salve All
I like Scotch.... No one ever asks me for a drink!..
Vale
Quintus Sertorius
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Perez" <senseiphil@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] TEQUILA


> Salve,
>
> You are right. The stuff I tried was most probably the crap sold really
> cheap. It was so vile the next morning that I never tried any ever Tequila
> again. Mind you, I have had gut-rot booze before. Everything from the
> stuff the hillbillies in Georgia and Kentucky make at home and call
> "Whiskey" to the Hard Cider of New Hampshire's White Mountain Boys (New
> England Hillbillies) near where I live make and nothing ever made me feel
> as bad the next morning as that Tequila.
>
> Vires et honos,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: M.IVL.SEVERVS
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 1:57 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] TEQUILA
>
>
> Severus Philippo omnibusque sal.
>
> It seems to me, Philippus amice, that you went just too far when talking
> about tequila. Everybody is entitled to have preferences, I agree, but
> nobody should talk with such authority, unless having the real knowledge.
> Now, being a Mexican who was born in Jalisco, the state where tequila
> first came to the world, I feel really aggraviated by your blunt
> remarks...
> Believe me, I have tried really vile stuff, including some rhums and
> whiskies, but I know about tequila, and I mean real tequila, not the stuff
> sold to tourists, the kind you find in most places in the United States.
> Good tequila is another thing, amice. Real connoiseurs appreciate it in
> the same dimension they appreciate superb cognac, for instance. I hope I
> can offer you, in the near future, at least a sip of authentic tequila, so
> you can know what you're talking about... and you won't wake up with a
> horrible hangover the next day!
>
> Vale, et valete optime,
>
> M.IVL.SEVERVS
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
> This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.
>
> Powered by Outblaze
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
> Fall of the roman empire The roman empire
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42368 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
> A. Tullia Scholastica M. Hortensiae Maiori quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
> bonae uoluntatis S.P.D.
>
> M.Hortensia A. Tullae spd;
> well said amica! And let's not forget the Gathas of
> Zarathustra and Zend-Avesta. I think the Gathas are about co-eval
> linguistically with the Vedas. Can you read them with your Sanskrit?
>
> ATS: Well, I¹ve read a little of the Rg Veda...and back when I was nearer
> to taking Sanskrit, I might have been able to read more of it...it¹s been a
> while. My Latin department has largely been reinstalled after several years
> in hibernation (and augmented); Greek is stirring from a longer slumber, and
> THEN Sanskrit may be attended to. I suspect that the Zend-Avesta and the
> Gathas are closer to Persian (almost surely the ZA is). My late Sanskrit
> professor could read Persian as well as Sanskrit, and would have been able to
> comment on that, but he chose the path of the bottle and the coffin nail, and
> died before reaching age 51. Hear, o devotees of Cuba Libre...instead of
> translating the Sanskrit epic, as he had started to do to high praise, he
> died‹too young, and looking twice his age.
>
> vale
> Maior
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
> The
>>> > > millions of adherents of these two Indic religions seem more
> likely to refer
>>> > > to one or the other of these scriptures as Œthe book¹ (granted,
> that there are
>>> > > four Vedas) than they are to the Torah or the OT, NT, etc.
>>> > >
>>> > > --> >
>>> > > Vale, et ualete,
>>> > >
>>> > > A. Tullia Scholastica
>>> > >
>>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>> >>
>
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42369 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Off Topic August Spies
> 50 million died in WWII as a result of the German version of socialism

The Nazis were racist, imperialist, fascist, anti-communist; the American
socialists of Spies' day were none of those things. It wasn't socialism
that started WWII; it was Hitler's desire to conquer.

(But this is off-topic, and likely to get very nasty very quickly, so
after this one response I will write no more here).

Vale, Octavius.


--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42370 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Salve,

I can't blame them. I'd rather drink iodine.

Vires Honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: Nathan Guiboche
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] TEQUILA


Salve All
I like Scotch.... No one ever asks me for a drink!..
Vale
Quintus Sertorius
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Perez" <senseiphil@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] TEQUILA


> Salve,
>
> You are right. The stuff I tried was most probably the crap sold really
> cheap. It was so vile the next morning that I never tried any ever Tequila
> again. Mind you, I have had gut-rot booze before. Everything from the
> stuff the hillbillies in Georgia and Kentucky make at home and call
> "Whiskey" to the Hard Cider of New Hampshire's White Mountain Boys (New
> England Hillbillies) near where I live make and nothing ever made me feel
> as bad the next morning as that Tequila.
>
> Vires et honos,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: M.IVL.SEVERVS
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 1:57 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] TEQUILA
>
>
> Severus Philippo omnibusque sal.
>
> It seems to me, Philippus amice, that you went just too far when talking
> about tequila. Everybody is entitled to have preferences, I agree, but
> nobody should talk with such authority, unless having the real knowledge.
> Now, being a Mexican who was born in Jalisco, the state where tequila
> first came to the world, I feel really aggraviated by your blunt
> remarks...
> Believe me, I have tried really vile stuff, including some rhums and
> whiskies, but I know about tequila, and I mean real tequila, not the stuff
> sold to tourists, the kind you find in most places in the United States.
> Good tequila is another thing, amice. Real connoiseurs appreciate it in
> the same dimension they appreciate superb cognac, for instance. I hope I
> can offer you, in the near future, at least a sip of authentic tequila, so
> you can know what you're talking about... and you won't wake up with a
> horrible hangover the next day!
>
> Vale, et valete optime,
>
> M.IVL.SEVERVS
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
> This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.
>
> Powered by Outblaze
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
> Fall of the roman empire The roman empire
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>


SPONSORED LINKS Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
Fall of the roman empire The roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42371 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Hee Hee! };-) You see.... It always works.....
QS

From: "Phil Perez"
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] TEQUILA
> Salve,
> I can't blame them. I'd rather drink iodine.
> Vires Honos,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus

From QS
" Salve All
I like Scotch.... No one ever asks me for a drink!..
Vale
Quintus Sertorius"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42372 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Salve Sertori.

You could drink Screetch, and then not only would no one want a
drink from you, but they would probably donate real spirits, or
alternatively hard cash to help you seek immediate medical treatment
for intestinal damage and brain-rot.

Vale
Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nathan Guiboche" <nate@...> wrote:
>
> Hee Hee! };-) You see.... It always works.....
> QS
>
> From: "Phil Perez"
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] TEQUILA
> > Salve,
> > I can't blame them. I'd rather drink iodine.
> > Vires Honos,
> > Marcus Cassius Philippus
>
> From QS
> " Salve All
> I like Scotch.... No one ever asks me for a drink!..
> Vale
> Quintus Sertorius"
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42373 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
I wonder if anyone here has ever had real screech. Not the stuff sold in stores as "Screech", but the real stuff from some still. When I was in Ottawa at a political convention (won't say which one, kind of embarrassed now), we did a shot, kissed a fish, and had to say "I is a Newfoundlander, I is". Or something like that. You won't forget screech, or rather, you will forget the night you had it.

I, too, like Scotch or Canadian whisky

Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
Salve Sertori.

You could drink Screetch, and then not only would no one want a
drink from you, but they would probably donate real spirits, or
alternatively hard cash to help you seek immediate medical treatment
for intestinal damage and brain-rot.

Vale
Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nathan Guiboche" <nate@...> wrote:
>
> Hee Hee! };-) You see.... It always works.....
> QS
>
> From: "Phil Perez"
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] TEQUILA
> > Salve,
> > I can't blame them. I'd rather drink iodine.
> > Vires Honos,
> > Marcus Cassius Philippus
>
> From QS
> " Salve All
> I like Scotch.... No one ever asks me for a drink!..
> Vale
> Quintus Sertorius"
>






SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42374 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Salve Agrippa.

Once, and only once. It was a "gift". Hmmmmm. I detected the aroma
of creosote and sampled the smoothness of what I think was its
principle ingredient, battery acid.

We should leave this genuine WMD at the side of roads in Iraq and
Afghanistan. It would be easy to spot the insurgents then, they
would be the ones clawing at their throats, stumbling blindly into
the path of on-coming trucks and babbling incoherently about flying
pink camels.

Those would be the lucky ones.

Vale
Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
<canadaoccidentalis@...> wrote:
>
> I wonder if anyone here has ever had real screech. Not the stuff
sold in stores as "Screech", but the real stuff from some still.
When I was in Ottawa at a political convention (won't say which one,
kind of embarrassed now), we did a shot, kissed a fish, and had to
say "I is a Newfoundlander, I is". Or something like that. You
won't forget screech, or rather, you will forget the night you had
it.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42375 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Maior wrote:

> M.Hortensia A. Tullae spd;
> well said amica! And let's not forget the Gathas of
> Zarathustra and Zend-Avesta. I think the Gathas are about co-eval
> linguistically with the Vedas. Can you read them with your Sanskrit?

The Arabs cerrtainly knew about their neighbors, the Zoroastrian Persians,
and since they were on a major seaborne trade route must have known about
the Indians as well. However, neither Zoroastrians nor Indians were what
they meant by "People of The Book". (The Granth Sahib, of course, was not
in existence in Mohammed's time.)

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42376 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: CUBA LIBRE
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:

> Salve, Maximus.
>
> Did we orgy just a bit too much last night? How about some garlic
> cheese with bread? Maybe a little salted ham & hard crackers? How
> about some cheese grits and fried eggs mixed with brains? Why are you
> rushing out the vomitorium, my friend?

The Greeks considerfed eating half a head of raw cabbage the best cure for
a hangover, according to de Camp. We all know that if there's anything to
be known about vice, the Greeks probably know it -- but I suspect that the
prospect of eating half a head of raw cabbage might lead a person to shun
drinking drunk.

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42377 From: Gaius Asinius Pollio Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
SALVETE OMNES

Concerning Christianity and ancient Rome I emphatically urge you to take a look at this
book here:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/9059113969/sr=8-1/qid=1141263434/
ref=pd_bbs_1/104-1799592-7137559?%5Fencoding=UTF8

Half of the book is online for free here:

http://www.carotta.de/subseite/texte/jwc_e/contents.html

To make it short: Jesus the Christ is the historical manifestation of the Divus Iulius as
handed down to us in the course of history. Jesus (as a man) was a Roman, the greatest
Roman - maybe the greatest man - to ever walk the face of the Earth: C. Iulius Caesar.

Please read it, and if you just don't get it, you are - I hate to say this - no real Romans, let
alone "new Romans". To extrapolate a bit (just quick and dirty): Nova Roma must accept
Christianity as the one and only superior Roman religion, including the Pope as the
modern-day pontifex maximus. All the other aspects of the so-called "pagan belief" of
ancient Rome are wonderful, thrilling, adorable and after all necessary - and should be
included, lived and pursued, but they can only be regarded as additions to the Roman
ruler cult that started with the divine Caesar and still continues to this day in every
Christian church on this planet. Like it or not: THIS version of Rome is still alive, has
always been - and will hopefully always be.

...and now think about what a new Rome can really be. Think about Jesus. Think about
Caesar. Amen.

With serious regards

C. ASINIVS POLLIO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42378 From: Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Salve Octavi,

On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Octavius wrote:

>> Is it? :) don't you think that defining what Nova Roma is and >>publicize it...
>> ...but should be given, if necessary, to teh Senate or to the people
>> as a whole thro a law?
>
>> No, I suppose you don't.

>Of course not. If there had to be a law for every change to the web >site
>then we'd only have about ten pages in total.

That's true, however Fuscus may have a point. Is this an administrative
change or a policy change? If it's a policy change, then the senate
*must* be involved as only the senate can set policy. Consular edicts
(or any kind of edicts) are only temporary orders that expire at the end
of the year and are used for the day to day running of the Republic, not
for making far reaching changes. This sounds like it might be a major
change in how we present ourselves to the world and as such could be
considered a policy change and need senate approval.

If it's an administrative change, then it merely required action by the
magister araenarius, it wouldn't fall under the consul's purview and
would be outside the scope of consular authority and edicts anyway.

If it is a policy change, then the senate must be consulted. Looking at
the site, it is *arguably* a policy change. It certainly wouldn't hurt
to consult the senate.

All that being said, it does look like a good idea and has potential.

Vale,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42379 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-01
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
M. Hortensia G. Asinio Pollio spd;
my dear Pollio my ancestors have given it a thought
millenia ago and pass, and frankly we don't want you;-)
each man and woman to his own beliefs or philosophy
or none at all is the only way for civilized people to behave.
bene vale
Marca Hortensia Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42380 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Salve
It just keeps getting better!!... I remember drinking a concoction called
"Moose Milk" when I first worked with the PPLCI, and that drink was truly
heroic!!.... As to medical treatment..... Of course, it's all for
medicinal purposes!!.... {:-P
Vale
Sertorius

From: "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: TEQUILA
> Salve Sertori.
> You could drink Screetch, and then not only would no one want a
> drink from you, but they would probably donate real spirits, or
> alternatively hard cash to help you seek immediate medical treatment
> for intestinal damage and brain-rot.
>
> Vale
> Caesar
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42381 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Up Scotch!!..
Sertorius

From: "Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa"
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: TEQUILA
>I wonder if anyone here has ever had real screech. Not the stuff sold in
>stores as "Screech", but the real stuff from some still. When I was in
>Ottawa at a political convention (won't say which one, kind of embarrassed
>now), we did a shot, kissed a fish, and had to say "I is a Newfoundlander,
>I is". Or something like that. You won't forget screech, or rather, you
>will forget the night you had it.
>
> I, too, like Scotch or Canadian whisky
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42382 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: History Of Distillation
Salvete omnes,

They say the use of spirits as we know it today actually
proliferated in the age of exploration since one could pack more
punch in a compact way by condensing the alcohol as such when
travelling by ship or wagon into the frontiers.

The real old timers told me that Newfoundland Screech was actually
home made hillbilly type alcohol. I remember hearing as a kid about
40 people made some screech in an area called Africville in Halifax
NS now a huge container pier area. It turned out to be wood alcohol.
Half of the 40 went permanently blind another several died. Today
when you get screeched in Newfoundland as I did, it is actually
Jamaican rum. For the record some of the best rums I tried come from
Colombia, Ron Medellin is one of my favourite which I get when
friends come back from there off and on. I make darn sure that the
rye or rum I taste is the pure sugar cane rum or juice of the barley
for whiskey. Many factories in America use corn alcohol and just
flavour it to pass off as those spirits so I am quite selective
sticking to Cuban rum, single malt scotch or real Irish whiskey.

As for the history of spirits it looks like they were invented long
ago but perhaps used in those times as medicinal or cosmetic
purposes. From the Wikipedia:

Distillation history

Beer and wine were historically limited to a maximum alcohol content
of about 15 percent by volume, beyond which yeast is adversely
affected and cannot ferment. Alcohol levels higher than 15 percent
have historically been obtained in a number of ways.

[edit]
Ancient

Wine heated in an animal bladder draws out water and leaves alcohol
behind (the bladder has a natural property which removes water), but
there is no evidence this method was used before modern times.

The first evidence of true distillation comes from Babylonia and
dates from the fourth millennium BC. Specially shaped clay pots were
used to extract small amounts of distilled alcohol through natural
cooling for use in perfumes, however it is unlikely this device ever
played a meaningful role in the history of the development of the
still. By the 3rd century AD there is evidence that alchemists in
Alexandria, Egypt, used distillation to produce alcohol for
sublimation and for coloring metal.

[edit]
Central Asia and the Middle East

Freeze distillation or the "Mongolian still", is known to have been
in use in Central Asia as early as the 7th century AD. This method
involves freezing the alcoholic beverage and removing water
crystals. The freezing method had limitations in geography and
implementation and thus did not have widespread use, but remained in
limited use, for example the American colonial period applejack was
made from cider using this method.

The development of the still with cooled collector — necessary for
the efficient distillation of spirits without freezing — was an
invention of Arab and Persian alchemists in the 8th or 9th
centuries. In particular, Geber (Jabir Ibn Hayyan, 721–815) invented
the alembic still; he observed that heated wine from this still
released a flammable vapor, which he described as "of little use,
but of great importance to science". Not much later Al-Razi (864–
930) described the distillation of alcohol and its use in medicine.
By that time, distilled spirits had become fairly popular beverages:
the poet Abu Nuwas (d. 813) describes a wine that "has the color of
rain-water but is as hot inside the ribs as a burning firebrand".
The terms "alembic" and "alcohol", and possibly the
metaphors "spirit" and aqua vitæ ("life-water") for the distilled
product, can be traced to Middle Eastern alchemy.

Names like "life water" have continued to be the inspiration for the
names of several types of beverages, like Gaelic whisky, French eaux-
de-vie and possibly vodka. Also, the Scandinavian akvavit spirit
gets its name from the Latin phrase aqua vitae.

[edit]
Europe

Alcohol first appeared in Europe in the mid 12th century among
alchemists, who were more interested in medical "elixirs" (ie.
entertainment purposes) than making gold from lead. It first appears
under the name aqua ardens (burning water) in the Compendium Salerni
from the medical school at Salerno. The recipe was written in code,
suggesting it was kept a secret. Taddeo Alderotti in his Consilia
medicinalis referred to the "serpente" which is believed to have
been the coiled tube of a still.

Paracelsus gave alcohol its modern name, taking it from the Arabic
word which means "finely divided", in reference to what is done to
wine. His test was to burn a spoonful without leaving any residue.
Other ways of testing were to burn a cloth soaked in it without
actually harming the cloth. In both cases, to achieve this effect
the alcohol had to have been at least 95 percent.

Claims on the origins of specific beverages are controversial, often
invoking national pride, but they are plausible after the 12th
century when Irish whiskey, German Hausbrand and German brandy can
all be safely said to have arrived. These beverages would have had
much lower alcohol content than the alchemists' pure distillations
(around 40 percent by volume), and were likely first thought of as
medicinal elixirs. Consumption of distilled beverages rose
dramatically in Europe in and after the mid 14th century, when
distilled liquors were commonly used as remedies for the Black
Death. Around 1400 it was discovered how to distill spirits from
wheat, barley, and rye beers; even sawdust was used to make alcohol,
a much cheaper option than grapes. Thus began the "national" drinks
of Europe: jenever (Belgium and the Netherlands), gin (England),
schnapps (Germany), aquavit (Scandinavia), vodka (Russia and
Poland), rakia (the Balkans). The actual names only emerged in the
16th century but the drinks were well known prior to that date.

[edit]
Modern distillation

The actual process of distillation itself has not changed since the
8th century. There have, however, been many changes in both the
methods by which organic material is prepared for the still and in
the ways the distilled beverage is finished and marketed. Knowledge
of the principles of sanitation and access to standardized yeast
strains have improved the quality of the base ingredient; larger,
more efficient stills produce more product per square foot and
reduce waste; ingredients such as corn, rice, and potatoes have been
called into service as inexpensive replacements for traditional
grains and fruit. Chemists have discovered the scientific principles
behind aging, and have devised ways in which aging can be
accelerated without introducing harsh flavors. Modern filters have
allowed distillers to remove unwanted residue and produce smoother
finished products. Most of all, marketing has developed a worldwide
market for distilled beverages among populations which in earlier
times did not drink spirits.


Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42383 From: caiusmoraviusbrutus Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
As a Pagan I would consider "them" to be part of the "us" team!

Caius Moravius Brutus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, dicconf <dicconf@...> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, caiusmoraviusbrutus wrote:
>
> > Perhaps we should just use the terms "us" and "them"!
>
> But what we're looking for is a term for "all of us except maybe
Hindus
> and Buddhists and Shintoists and Taoists,.."
>
> -- Piblius Livius Triarius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42384 From: caiusmoraviusbrutus Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
While the Arabic term Ahl al Kitab "people of the book" did
originally refer specifically to Muslims, Christians and Jews it was
applied to Zoroastrians after the Islamic conquest/conversion of
Iran. This was presumably to ease the assimilation of the general
population much in the same way that the Christians in the west did
by adopting our feast days and much of our imagery.

There would have been a need to reach some sort of accomodation with
the followers of Zoroaster as, I believe, "people of the book" have a
rather different - and superior - status from Pagans under Islamic
law.

Valete

Brutus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, dicconf <dicconf@...> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Maior wrote:
>
> > M.Hortensia A. Tullae spd;
> > well said amica! And let's not forget the Gathas of
> > Zarathustra and Zend-Avesta. I think the Gathas are about co-eval
> > linguistically with the Vedas. Can you read them with your
Sanskrit?
>
> The Arabs cerrtainly knew about their neighbors, the Zoroastrian
Persians,
> and since they were on a major seaborne trade route must have known
about
> the Indians as well. However, neither Zoroastrians nor Indians
were what
> they meant by "People of The Book". (The Granth Sahib, of course,
was not
> in existence in Mohammed's time.)
>
> -- Publius Livius Triarius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42385 From: Gaius Asinius Pollio Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Seems you haven't understood a word I was saying. Too bad. Vale. C. Asinius Pollio.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia G. Asinio Pollio spd;
> my dear Pollio my ancestors have given it a thought
> millenia ago and pass, and frankly we don't want you;-)
> each man and woman to his own beliefs or philosophy
> or none at all is the only way for civilized people to behave.
> bene vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42386 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
> Is this an administrative change or a policy change? If it's a policy change,
> then the senate *must* be involved as only the senate can set policy.

Magistrates may still set policies and enforce them within their limited
domain; these are of course temporary. In the case of the web site it has
always been the case that volunteers were sought and would be given access
to make changes, but could be summarily dismissed by the curator/magister
if they made improper changes (though I don't think this has ever happened).

The major difference now is that the Wiki makes it spectacularly easy to
sign up and begin working within minutes, even for people who don't
understand at all how web sites work, and eventually we probably will have
to block someone for attempted vandalism.

> Consular edicts
> (or any kind of edicts) are only temporary orders that expire at the end
> of the year and are used for the day to day running of the Republic, not
> for making far reaching changes.

Good point; I wouldn't like to see all of this work undone by next year's
magister who might have a strong enough preference for a different system
that much content might be thrown out, or who might throw out the policies
we establish this year.

We could seek Senate approval of these policies:
1 - that the Wiki is the preferred content management system
2 - that anyone may volunteer and edit, but may be dismissed by the
Magister Aranearius (or his scribae, the WikiMagisters)
3 - that "Neutral Point of View" will be strictly enforced. That is,
for controversial topics like the debate of a few weeks ago, it must
be presented in a strictly factual and neutral manner with equal weight
given to both sides. (This is how wikipedia.org handles such issues).
4 - the wikimagisters will protect pages that are likely to be vandalized,
such as the main page or leges, so only admins can edit.

Until that happens these would be only temporary policies enforced by
magister's edicts; I'd like to see them last longer than this year.

> It certainly wouldn't hurt to consult the senate.

I'll see if we can put something together (similar to the above)
and ask the Consuls to present it.

Vale, Octavius.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42387 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
On 3/2/06, Gaius Asinius Pollio <smaitee@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Please read it, and if you just don't get it, you are - I hate to say this
> - no real Romans,


I was always taught - Never argue with a fool, it only confuses the
bystanders. Otherwise of course I'd love to debate this :-)

Flavia Lucilla Merula

--
> Chaos, confusion, disorder - my work here is done


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42388 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Scotch? If I wanted the taste of bog in my rye whisky, I would drink Scotch but otherwise "No." As a famous person once said, "Scotch? It was inwented by a little old lady in Leningrad!"

Aurelianus

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Perez <senseiphil@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 20:43:30 -0500
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] TEQUILA


Salve,

I can't blame them. I'd rather drink iodine.

Vires Honos,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: Nathan Guiboche
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] TEQUILA


Salve All
I like Scotch.... No one ever asks me for a drink!..
Vale
Quintus Sertorius
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Perez" <senseiphil@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] TEQUILA


> Salve,
>
> You are right. The stuff I tried was most probably the crap sold really
> cheap. It was so vile the next morning that I never tried any ever Tequila
> again. Mind you, I have had gut-rot booze before. Everything from the
> stuff the hillbillies in Georgia and Kentucky make at home and call
> "Whiskey" to the Hard Cider of New Hampshire's White Mountain Boys (New
> England Hillbillies) near where I live make and nothing ever made me feel
> as bad the next morning as that Tequila.
>
> Vires et honos,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: M.IVL.SEVERVS
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 1:57 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] TEQUILA
>
>
> Severus Philippo omnibusque sal.
>
> It seems to me, Philippus amice, that you went just too far when talking
> about tequila. Everybody is entitled to have preferences, I agree, but
> nobody should talk with such authority, unless having the real knowledge.
> Now, being a Mexican who was born in Jalisco, the state where tequila
> first came to the world, I feel really aggraviated by your blunt
> remarks...
> Believe me, I have tried really vile stuff, including some rhums and
> whiskies, but I know about tequila, and I mean real tequila, not the stuff
> sold to tourists, the kind you find in most places in the United States.
> Good tequila is another thing, amice. Real connoiseurs appreciate it in
> the same dimension they appreciate superb cognac, for instance. I hope I
> can offer you, in the near future, at least a sip of authentic tequila, so
> you can know what you're talking about... and you won't wake up with a
> horrible hangover the next day!
>
> Vale, et valete optime,
>
> M.IVL.SEVERVS
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
> This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.
>
> Powered by Outblaze
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
> Fall of the roman empire The roman empire
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>


SPONSORED LINKS Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
Fall of the roman empire The roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Yahoo! Groups Links






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42389 From: bcatfd@together.net Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2362
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 23:14:06 -0600
From: "Nathan Guiboche" <nate@...>
Subject: Re: Re: TEQUILA

Up Scotch!!..
Sertorius

From: "Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa"
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: TEQUILA
>I wonder if anyone here has ever had real screech. Not the stuff sold in
>stores as "Screech", but the real stuff from some still. When I was in
>Ottawa at a political convention (won't say which one, kind of embarrassed
>now), we did a shot, kissed a fish, and had to say "I is a Newfoundlander,
>I is". Or something like that. You won't forget screech, or rather, you
>will forget the night you had it.
>
> I, too, like Scotch or Canadian whisky

Scotch and Irish whisky both work for me, depending on the brands.

Palladius

-------------
------------
------------
------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42390 From: Gaius Asinius Pollio Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
> I was always taught - Never argue with a fool, it only confuses the
> bystanders.

Very true.

> Otherwise of course I'd love to debate this :-)

I'm with you on this one. But maybe I would need to explain my first post a bit more, since
it obviously caused some irration, as can be judged from Marca Hortensia Maior's post.

Quote: "if you just don't get it, you are no real Romans".

Since Christianity turns out to be of pure Roman origin - namely the cult of Divus Iulius -
we "Romans" and "Nova Romans" should be able to understand and debate this, maybe
more than other people, who are not as knowledgable in this field.

Quote: "Nova Roma must accept Christianity as the one and only superior Roman religion."

The emphasis is on "Roman": the only religion of Roman origin that has survived to this
day is Christianity. So history itself has proven the superiority of the Roman imperial
religio. I didn't mean "superior" as of being better or preferrable over Judaism, Islam or any
other religion for that matter. Rome has always been about religious freedom, even under
Nero. So Marca Hortensia Maior is absolutely right in saying: "Each man and woman to his
own beliefs or philosophy or none at all is the only way for civilized people to behave." I
never meant my post to mean that all new Romans should be Christians or something. :-D

Quote: "All the other aspects of the so-called "pagan belief" of ancient Rome should be
included, lived and pursued"

Now - with this knowledge of Christianity being a continuation of the Julian religion, the
cult of Divus Julius - even more so!!

Quote: "they can only be regarded as additions to the Roman ruler cult"

Which doesn't make them less important, but the highest god of the state was - and still is
for Christians - the Diuus Iulius, aka Iesus. One cannot argue that away.

Quote: "and now think about what a new Rome can really be."

What more things are there, inside Christianity, that we can trace back to Caesar and the
Divi filius? How could a new Rome - including Christianity - look like? How can a new
Christianity itself look like?

Hope to have cleared up that thing about the "fool". Sorry for any misunderstanding.

VALETE

C. ASINIVS POLLIO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42391 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
Salve, Consul Modianus

I tried that NRWiki addy, but it sent me to a page saying the site couldn't be found. Maybe I got the addy wrong?

Vale bene in pace deorum,

Maxima Valeria Messallina


Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
<sniped>

IV. Any citizen who wishes to participate may do so by signing up for a Wiki account and joining the mailing list NRWiki@yahoogroups.com.


---------------------------------
Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42392 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, caiusmoraviusbrutus wrote:

> While the Arabic term Ahl al Kitab "people of the book" did
> originally refer specifically to Muslims, Christians and Jews it was
> applied to Zoroastrians after the Islamic conquest/conversion of
> Iran. This was presumably to ease the assimilation of the general
> population much in the same way that the Christians in the west did
> by adopting our feast days and much of our imagery.
>
> There would have been a need to reach some sort of accomodation with
> the followers of Zoroaster as, I believe, "people of the book" have a
> rather different - and superior - status from Pagans under Islamic
> law.

Then I misunderstood some earlier history. I understood that, while the
Muslims extended tolerance (in return for heavier taxes) toward Christians
and Jews, treating Islam as an ethnic Arabic faith, they changed this
policy to active repression after the conquest of Persia, where
Zoroastrians were compelled to convert or flee the country (to India,
where they still exist as Parsee). Thanks for this correction.
-- Publ;ius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42393 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:

> Scotch? If I wanted the taste of bog in my rye whisky, I would drink
> Scotch but otherwise "No." As a famous person once said, "Scotch? It
> was inwented by a little old lady in Leningrad!"

Religious wars are the most savage and intractable of conflicts.

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42394 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
C. Equitius Cato C. Asinio Pollioni quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete omnes!

Well, that's certainly an imaginative spin on the history of
Christianity. I wonder if Iulius Caesar was acually married to Mary
Magdalene then? This is going to throw a wrench in Dan Brown's
theories...

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42395 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Kalendis Martiis and the Calendar for March
Salvete Quirites, and Peregrines!

As I hope you've come now to expect, yesterday the usual libation to
Juno was made. Also, as it was the Matronalia, I included a prayer for
the well being of the State, the People, and for our continued existence
and the continuation of the Roman People. Happily, it went without any
problems, save the usual toga problems. As always, I will be happy to
provide the text of the ritual for anyone interested upon request.

Below I have also included the calendar for the remainder of the month,
which I'll likely repost on the Ides.

If there are any questions, comments, concerns, or otherwise, please
don't hesitate to contact me. I'll be happy to respond.

Valete,

Quintus Caecilius Metellus
Pontifex, Fetialis, et Civis Plebeius Romanus

=====

1 Kal. Mar. D NP
2 a.d. VI Non. Mar. E F Ater
3 a.d. V Non. Mar. F C Religiosus
4 a.d. IV Non. Mar. G C Religiosus
5 a.d. III Non. Mar. H C Religiosus
6 pr. Non. Mar. A C Religiosus
7 Non. Mar. B F Religiosus
8 a.d. VIII Id. Mar. C F Ater
9 a.d. VII Id. Mar. D C Religiosus
10 a.d. VI Id. Mar. E C Religiosus
11 a.d. V Id. Mar. F C Religiosus
12 a.d. IV Id. Mar. G C Religiosus
13 a.d. III Id. Mar. H EN Religiosus
14 pr. Id. Mar. A NP Religiosus
15 Id. Mar. B NP Religiosus
16 a.d. XVII Kal. Apr. C F Ater
17 a.d. XVI Kal. Apr. D NP Religiosus
18 a.d. XV Kal. Apr. E C Religiosus
19 a.d. XIV Kal. Apr. F NP Religiosus
20 a.d. XIII Kal. Apr. G C Religiosus
21 a.d. XII Kal. Apr. H C Religiosus
22 a.d. XI Kal. Apr. A N Religiosus
23 a.d. X Kal. Apr. B NP Religiosus
24 a.d. IX Kal. Apr. C QRCF
25 a.d. VIII Kal. Apr. D C
26 a.d. VII Kal. Apr. E C
27 a.d. VI Kal. Apr. F C
28 a.d. V Kal. Apr. G C
29 a.d. IV Kal. Apr. H C
30 a.d. III Kal. Apr. A C
31 pr. Kal. Apr. B C
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42396 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, gaiusequitiuscato wrote:

> C. Equitius Cato C. Asinio Pollioni quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salve et salvete omnes!
>
> Well, that's certainly an imaginative spin on the history of
> Christianity. I wonder if Iulius Caesar was acually married to Mary
> Magdalene then? This is going to throw a wrench in Dan Brown's
> theories...

Not when he died nearly half a century before Jesus' birth.

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42397 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Salve Cato,

gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> writes:

> I wonder if Iulius Caesar was acually married to Mary
> Magdalene then?

They had a hot group marriage going. Mary Magdelene was married to Iulius
Caesar *and* Jesus *and* Cleopatra. And they all meditated regularly using
the Weed of Heaven. Yeah, that's it...

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42398 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
M. Hortensia Bruto Trirario spd;
'Dhimmi'- tude the status of being 'dhimmi' was no treat.
Zartoshti were treated miserably in their own country. And today
Persians resent mightily the Arabification of their culture, just
the same as some complain of Westernization.
Their is no grand kind of unity other than understanding
our common polytheistic roots in the Near East and the confluence
with Classical culture, as well as realizing that other cultures
such as India and China existed then and rated highly on the scale
of sophisticated cultures.
bene valete
Marca Hortensia Maior


> While the Arabic term Ahl al Kitab "people of the book" did
> originally refer specifically to Muslims, Christians and Jews it
was
> applied to Zoroastrians after the Islamic conquest/conversion of
> Iran. This was presumably to ease the assimilation of the general
> population much in the same way that the Christians in the west
did
> by adopting our feast days and much of our imagery.
>
> There would have been a need to reach some sort of accomodation
with
> the followers of Zoroaster as, I believe, "people of the book"
have a
> rather different - and superior - status from Pagans under Islamic
> law.
>
> Valete
>
> Brutus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, dicconf <dicconf@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Maior wrote:
> >
> > > M.Hortensia A. Tullae spd;
> > > well said amica! And let's not forget the Gathas of
> > > Zarathustra and Zend-Avesta. I think the Gathas are about co-
eval
> > > linguistically with the Vedas. Can you read them with your
> Sanskrit?
> >
> > The Arabs cerrtainly knew about their neighbors, the Zoroastrian
> Persians,
> > and since they were on a major seaborne trade route must have
known
> about
> > the Indians as well. However, neither Zoroastrians nor Indians
> were what
> > they meant by "People of The Book". (The Granth Sahib, of
course,
> was not
> > in existence in Mohammed's time.)
> >
> > -- Publius Livius Triarius
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42399 From: Gaius Asinius Pollio Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Salvete

> I wonder if Iulius Caesar was acually married to Mary
> Magdalene then?

Well, to be honest, in many cases no other than Cleopatra hides behind Maria Magdalena
in the Gospel text. So in this case, it's NO: Jesus and Maria were not married, Maria was
only his mistress, but YES: as Caesar and Cleopatra they had a child, namely Caesarion. :-)
There is of course one pericope, at Caesar's cremation (which structurally - and textually -
corresponds to Jesus' crucifixion), where most probably Calpurnia hides behind Maria
Magdalena, whereas Cleopatra is Salome this time - as many other times before in the
Gospel. So I guess, you can take your pick then. ;-)

As for the many other Marias, Maria the mother of God, Maria the mother of the man
Jesus, Maria the mother of Jacobus and Joses, Lazarus' Maria and Maria of Magdala, one
should better read in the book. (That would be a bit tiring, especially for me, don't you
think?) :-)

> > Well, that's certainly an imaginative spin on the history of Christianity
>
> Not when he died nearly half a century before Jesus' birth.

Actually it's not about them having been one and the SAME person, but it's about the
adaptation of historical texts in a different cultural environment (Palestine) a few
generations later. It's about the mutation and transformation of the vita Caesaris through
errors made in processes of translation and copying.

Valete

C. Asinius Pollio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42400 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: post. Kal. Mar (a.d. VI Non. Mar.)
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est postridie Kalendas Martias; haec dies fastus aterque est.

"The king of the Romans, after letting a year pass, during which he
made the necessary preparations for war, resolved to lead out his army
against the city of the Fidenates. The grounds he alleged for the war
were that this people, being called upon to justify themselves in the
matter of the plot that they had formed against the Romans and Albans,
had paid no heed, but immediately taking up arms, shutting their
gates, and bringing in the allied forces of the Veientes, had openly
revolted, and that when ambassadors arrived from Rome to inquire the
reason for their revolt, they had answered that they no longer had
anything in common with the Romans since the death of Romulus, their
king, to whom they had sworn their oaths of friendship. Seizing on
these grounds for war, Tullus was not only arming his own forces, but
also sending for those of his allies. The most numerous as well as the
best auxiliary troops were brought to him from Alba by Mettius
Fufetius, and they were equipped with such splendid arms as to excel
all the other allied forces. Tullus, therefore, believing that
Mettius had been actuated by zeal and by the best motives in deciding
to take part in the war, commended him and communicated to him all his
plans. But this man, who was accused by his fellow citizens of having
mismanaged the recent war and was furthermore charged with treason, in
view of the fact that he continued in the supreme command of the city
for the third year by order of Tullus, disdaining now to hold any
longer a command that was subject to another's command or to be
subordinated rather than himself to lead, devised an abominable plot.
He sent ambassadors here and there secretly to the enemies of the
Romans while they were as yet wavering in their resolution to revolt
and encouraged them not to hesitate, promising that he himself would
join them in attacking the Romans during the battle; and these
activities and plans he kept secret from everybody. Tullus, as soon
as he had got ready his own army as well as that of his allies,
marched against the enemy and after crossing the river Anio encamped
near Fidenae. And finding a considerable army both of the Fidenates
and of their allies drawn up before the city, he lay quiet that day;
but on the next he sent for Fufetius, the Alban, and the closest of
his other friends and took counsel with them concerning the best
method of conducting the war. And when all were in favour of engaging
promptly and not wasting time, he assigned them their several posts
and commands, and having fixed the next day for the battle, he
dismissed the council.

In the meantime Fufetius, the Alban — for his treachery was still a
secret to many even of his own friends — calling together the most
prominent centurions and tribunes among the Albans, addressed them as
follows:

"Tribunes and centurions, I am going to disclose to you important and
unexpected things which I have hitherto been concealing; and I beg of
you to keep them secret if you do not wish to ruin me, and to assist
me in carrying them out if you think their realization will be
advantageous. The present occasion does not permit of many words, as
the time is short; so I shall mention only the most essential matters.
I, from the time we were subordinated to the Romans up to this day,
have led a life full of sham en grief, though honoured by the king
with the supreme command, which I am now holding for the third year
and may, if I should so desire, hold as long as I live. But regarding
it as the greatest of all evils to be the only fortunate man in a time
of public misfortune, and taking it to heart that, contrary to all the
rights mankind look upon as sacred, we have been deprived by the
Romans of our supremacy, I took thought how we might recover it
without experiencing any great disaster. And although I considered
many plans of every sort, the only way I could discover that promised
success, and at the same time the easiest and the least dangerous one,
was in hand a war should be started against them by the neighbouring
states. For I assumed that when confronted by such a war they would
have need of allies and particularly of us. As to the next step, I
assumed that it would not require much argument to convince you that
it is more glorious as well as more fitting to fight for our liberty
than for the supremacy of the Romans. " - Dionysius of Halicarnassus
3.23, 1-8

Today is the second day of the festival of Mars.

"Remote though your farm be, It's something to be the lord of one
green lizard - and free." - Iuvenal, Satires

On March 2, A.D. 55, the Roman poet Iuvenal was born.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Iuvenal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42401 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Praesertim potoribus S.P.D. A. Tullia Scholastica
>
> It seems that some people just CAN¹T take hints. Guys, this is not a
> tavern (though I understand that there is a virtual NR tavern somewhere on
> Yahoo). This is a list devoted to subjects concerning ancient Rome, and those
> related thereto. Occasional excursions to macro world politics et al. are
> permitted. This, however, has nothing to do with such subjects, which may be
> of legitimate interest to adolescents even though they aren¹t old enough to
> vote. Drinking, however, is something forbidden to adolescents, but
> attractive to them, and is not something to be praised here, or to be the
> subject of instruction here. Not only do we have minors here who are legally
> not adult, we also have those who are technically adult who are BELOW the
> legal drinking age, which is 21 in the US and, so far as I know, 19 in Canada.
> Yahoo rules forbid us from doing anything harmful to minors‹and drinking is
> not only harmful to minors (and to adults if done in excess), it is ILLEGAL
> for them. It is also illegal for younger technical adults‹with good reason,
> since physiology is involved in the ability to process alcohol. Moreover,
> civilized adults do not drink to the point of drunkenness, nor do they consume
> large quantities of the stuff. They may have some wine with dinner, or drink
> a beer; they may use wine or beer in cooking (I do; I made coq au vin a few
> days ago). They might even take some ron Bacardi or whatever occasionally‹but
> they DON¹T drink to excess. Now, I do agree with M. Cassius Philippus about
> the taste of Scotch...
>
> Please drop this thread. You are giving a very bad example to the younger
> members of the list, and to the newbies, who must think that NR is composed of
> a bunch of drunks.
>
> Valete,
>
> ATS
>
> ================================
>
> Scotch? If I wanted the taste of bog in my rye whisky, I would drink Scotch
> but otherwise "No." As a famous person once said, "Scotch? It was inwented
> by a little old lady in Leningrad!"
>
> Aurelianus
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Perez <senseiphil@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 20:43:30 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] TEQUILA
>
>
> Salve,
>
> I can't blame them. I'd rather drink iodine.
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42402 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
> A. Tullia Scholastica Maximae Valeriae Messallinae amicae quiritibus, sociis,
> peregrinisque bonae uoluntatis S.P.D.
>
> Salve, Consul Modianus
>
> I tried that NRWiki addy, but it sent me to a page saying the site couldn't
> be found. Maybe I got the addy wrong?
>
> ATS: Perhaps; I had no trouble with it, and I¹m no cybernaut. Just click
> on it from the original message.
>
> Vale bene in pace deorum,
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> Scholastica
>
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
> <sniped>
>
> IV. Any citizen who wishes to participate may do so by signing up for a Wiki
> account and joining the mailing list NRWiki@yahoogroups.com.
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42403 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: Rome in the East (Battle Of Carrahe)
> Salue, Q. Sertori, et saluete, omnes bonae uoluntatis.
>
> Salve QSP
> I remember seeing a story some where were there are people in china with
> light features that will tell any one that they are decedents of those same
> Crassusian legionnaires!! Yes truly amazing..
>
> ATS: You may also recall that archaeologists found a female mummy with
> long blonde hair in central China some years ago...
>
> Vale
> Quintus Sertorius
>
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> Scholastica
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 7:33 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Rome in the East (Battle Of Carrahe)
>
>
>> > Salvete Quinte Sertori et omnes,
>> >
>> > Looks like it could have;here is a good, quick synopsis of the
>> > Battle Of Carrahae with mention of the Chinese connection from UNVR
>> > History Site:
>> >
>> > Battle of Carrhae
>> >
>> > -After receiving word from his scouts about the presence of a
>> > Parthian army near Carrhae in 53 BC, Crassus seems to have panicked.
>> > His troops were exhausted and poorly prepared for battle after a
>> > long and fast march through the Mesopotamian desert. He didn't allow
>> > his men to rest or make camp, but instead began to form lines for
>> > battle. Advised by his officer staff to stretch out in classic
>> > formation with the infantry flanked by cavalry, Crassus instead
>> > ordered hollow square formations to allow defense against flanking.
>> > He commanded the middle while his son Publius and another officer,
>> > Cassius, commanded the wings. They advanced toward the smaller and
>> > less impressive Parthian force far too confident.
>> >
>> > As they approached with 35,000 men, the Parthian force seemed to be
>> > only about 10,000 men, mainly light horse archers. However, as they
>> > approached, the Parthian commander Surena ordered cavalry positioned
>> > at the rear uncover their concealed armor. The vaunted Parthian
>> > cataphracts were small in number, but their heavy armor was
>> > definitely an impressive and intimidating sight. As the battle
>> > opened a hail of Parthian arrows pinned down the Romans. Crassus
>> > ordered his son Publius to attack the archers with his Gallic
>> > cavalry and a force of infantry. Initially, Publius drove back the
>> > horse archers, but found himself far away from the main Roman body.
>> > The Parthians cut off his force, surrounding it with horse archers
>> > and the cataphracts. Though the Gauls fought bravely and
>> > ferociously, Publius was overwhelmed, and the cataphracts seemed
>> > invincible. Trapped away from his father and the army, Publius
>> > ordered his own death at the hand of one of his men, and the Roman
>> > force was butchered.
>> >
>> > Crassus meanwhile got word that his son was in trouble, just as
>> > pressure was diverted from his own lines to that of Publius' force.
>> > Crassus reformed his lines in the traditional Roman style and
>> > ordered a general advance. As this was getting under way however,
>> > the Parthians who had defeated the Gallic cavalry rode in front of
>> > the Romans with the head of Publius on a spear. The Roman advance
>> > was stopped fast by the Parthians, and the already rattled Crassus,
>> > seems to have lost the will to fight. His legates, Cassius and
>> > Octavius ordered a retreat intended to save the army during the
>> > night, desperately leaving the wounded on the field. Remaining
>> > cavalry fled the battle immediately, leaving Crassus without scouts.
>> > They rode first to Carrhae to inform the garrison of the battle and
>> > then hurried on to Zeugma to avoid the disaster that was sure to
>> > come.
>> >
>> > In the confusion and desperation of the Roman retreat, as many as
>> > 4,000 wounded legionaries were put to the sword as the Parthians
>> > came in pursuit the following morning. Another 4 cohorts had been
>> > separated from the main body and were surrounded and killed, save
>> > for 20 men who were allowed to flee for displaying exceptional
>> > bravery. Crassus and the remaining Roman army reached the relative
>> > safety of Carrhae and probably prepared for a siege. Crassus
>> > however, was still obviously unsettled. Once again a Parthian spy
>> > duped him, this time into fleeing the safety of the town. The spy
>> > led the Romans to inescapable terrain and the Parthian main force
>> > approached. They offered a parlay, including an offer of peace if
>> > Crassus himself joined the negotiation. At first he refused, but the
>> > legionaries, afraid and exhausted, threatened his life if he didn't
>> > accept the offer. At the meeting, the Parthians seized and executed
>> > Crassus and the Roman party, sending the Romans into further
>> > disarray.
>> >
>> > In the end, the great bulk of the Roman army was hunted down and
>> > killed or captured. Nearly 20,000 were killed and another 10,000
>> > captured. Of the original force, only about 5,000 men under Cassius,
>> > and the cavalry that departed early, managed to escape. The
>> > Parthians meanwhile, settled the Roman prisoners in an eastern
>> > territory called Sogdia. Interestingly, the Han Chinese later
>> > captured this area and the Roman transplants were likely among the
>> > first westerners to meet the Chinese directly.
>> >
>> > The death of Crassus helped signal the end of the triumvirate
>> > between he, Caesar and Pompey, but even if he had lived its doubtful
>> > that civil war wouldn't have erupted eventually anyway. As the
>> > Romans were too pre-occupied with western concerns and the political
>> > turmoil that was about to erupt, the situation with Parthia was
>> > largely ignored for nearly another 30 years. Parthian king Orodes II
>> > ordered the death of Surena shortly thereafter, and the Parthians
>> > did little to press their advantage in eastern Roman territories.
>> > The lost standards of Crassus' lost legions remained in a Parthian
>> > temple Rome's first emperor, Augustus, negotiated their return in 20
>> > BC.-
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > QSP
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nathan Guiboche" <nate@...> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Salve
>>> >> Did this not have connectuions to Crassus' lost legions after the
>> > battle of
>>> >> Carrhae?
>>> >> Vale
>>> >> Quintus Sertorius
>>> >>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42404 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
C. Equitius Cato Asinio Pollioni quiritubusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

I think it's best just to let this one go :-)

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42405 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: TEQUILA
Salve ATS
As one who participated in that tread, I now see your point and will
desist... I should have known...
Vale
Sertorius
From: "A. Tullia Scholastica"
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] TEQUILA
> Praesertim potoribus S.P.D. A. Tullia Scholastica
> It seems that some people just CAN¹T take hints.
> Please drop this thread.
> Valete,
> ATS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42406 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: Rome in the East (Battle Of Carrahe)
Salve ATS
I had heard that approximately 10,000 of Crasus' Army after thier defeat at
Carrahe were sent to garrison the Parthian border with the east facing
China. After the fall of the Parthian Empire in that area the legionnaires
started working for the Chinese garrisoning the same border against the
Parthians. They ended up settling there.
Vale
Sertorius
From: "A. Tullia Scholastica"
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Rome in the East (Battle Of Carrahe)
>> Salue, Q. Sertori, et saluete, omnes bonae uoluntatis.
>> ATS: You may also recall that archaeologists found a female mummy with
>> long blonde hair in central China some years ago...
>> Vale, et ualete,
>> Scholastica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42407 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Re: Rome in the East (Battle Of Carrahe)
Salvete omnes,

Here is another article of interest - QSP:


Romans in China? Volume 52 Number 3, May/June 1999
by Erling Hoh

Baffled peasants in a windswept village in Gansu province are being
described by Chinese newspapers as blond-haired, blue-eyed
descendants of Roman mercenaries who allegedly fought the Han
Chinese 2,000 years ago. While no one in the modern town of Lou
Zhuangzi is fair and there is no proof that the Romans ever set foot
in Gansu before the Christian era, the reports have revived
discussion over whether a group of Romans offered their services to
the Hun warlord Jzh Jzh in 36 B.C. before settling in the Gansu
village of Liqian, thought by some to be Lou Zhuangzi.

This idea was first proposed by Homer Hasenphlug Dubs, an Oxford
University professor of Chinese history, who speculated in 1955 that
some of the 10,000 Roman prisoners taken by the Parthians after the
battle of Carrhae in southeastern Turkey in 53 B.C. made their way
east to Uzbekistan to enlist with Jzh Jzh against the Han. Chinese
accounts of the battle, in which Jzh Jzh was decapitated and his
army defeated, note unusual military formations and the use of
wooden fortifications foreign to the nomadic Huns. Dubs postulated
that after the battle the Chinese employed the Roman mercenaries as
border guards, settling them in Liqian, a short form of Alexandria
used by the Chinese to denote Rome. While some Chinese scholars have
been critical of Dubs' hypothesis, others went so far as to identify
Lou Zhuangzi as the probable location of Liqian in the late 1980s.

Ten years later, still no academic papers have been published on the
subject, and no archaeological investigation has been conducted in
Lou Zhuangzi, but the media and local government remain unfazed.
County officials, sensing potential tourist revenue, have erected a
Doric pavilion in Lou Zhuangzi, while the county capital of
Yongchang has decorated its main thoroughfare with enormous statues
of a Roman soldier and a Roman woman flanking a Communist party
official.


© 1999 by the Archaeological Institute of America
www.archaeology.org/9905/newsbriefs/china.html









--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nathan Guiboche" <nate@...> wrote:
>
> Salve ATS
> I had heard that approximately 10,000 of Crasus' Army after thier
defeat at
> Carrahe were sent to garrison the Parthian border with the east
facing
> China. After the fall of the Parthian Empire in that area the
legionnaires
> started working for the Chinese garrisoning the same border
against the
> Parthians. They ended up settling there.
> Vale
> Sertorius
> From: "A. Tullia Scholastica"
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Rome in the East (Battle Of Carrahe)
> >> Salue, Q. Sertori, et saluete, omnes bonae uoluntatis.
> >> ATS: You may also recall that archaeologists found a female
mummy with
> >> long blonde hair in central China some years ago...
> >> Vale, et ualete,
> >> Scholastica
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42408 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: EDICTUM PROPRAETORICUM IV ABOUT PROVINCIAL ADMINISTRATION APPOINTME
SALVETE !

EX OFFICIO PROPRAETORIS DACIA
EDICTUM IV 2759 a.U.c

EDICTUM PROPRAETORICUM IV ABOUT PROVINCIAL ADMINISTRATION APPOINTMENTS.

Lucia Iulia Severa is hereby appointed as the representative for Provincia Dacia in the Collegium Interprovinciale for the year 2759 a.U.c

This edict is effective immediately.
Hoc edictum statim valet.

Given under my hand this 3rd day of March 2759 a.U.c ( 3 March 2006 )
Datum sub manu mea ante diem V Nones Martias MMDCCLIX ab Urbe condita

T.IVL SABINVS
Propraetor Dacia

In the consulship of Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus and Pompeia Minucia Strabo.
Gaio Fabio Buteone Modiano, Pompeia Minucia Strabone: consulibus.





NOVA ROMANI !
Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support page to your websites.
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm

"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42409 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Citizen Authors! Hail!
Salvete!

Citizens! Have you written a book? Any book? List it here:
http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/Books_by_Nova_Roma_citizens , or you may
write in private to me and I'll add it for you.

Let's keep it simple for now, just like the samples.

Optime valete!

M. Lucretius Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42410 From: daylily218 Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: I'm Overwhelmed!
I'm absolutely amazed at the number of Hadrianus/Sol
photos I've sent to listmembers who've written me. Now
that's it's died down (I've sent photos of the two coins,
each a denarius, to 27 people now), I can now offer a photo of an
antoninianus of Traianus Decius to anyone who contacts me.
This coin came to mind when I saw one of the members list
his title with "Pannoniae" in it. Trajan Decius was known
for having a reverse of the two Pannoniae standing, each
with face to the opposite direction. Let me know if anyone
is interested in this coin. Valete. Kim
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42411 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-02
Subject: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
I wanted to show this to the Canadians on the list, to show your current
involvement in
the "War against Terror" You have our thanks.

Q. Fabius Maximus

In a message dated 2/28/2006 2:55:38 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
moderncrossfire@yahoogroups.com writes:



KANDAHAR, Afghanistan - They call them "sura espiyan," Pashtun for "red
dogs," and the LAV III armoured vehicles are "bala," or "monsters."

After two weeks of probing and testing the Canadian soldiers who
have been patrolling their territory in southern Afghanistan,
Taliban insurgents in the dangerous hills and mountains around
Kandahar have learned to be wary of the soldiers with the Maple Leaf
on their shoulders.

And with a Canadian general to take command today of Afghanistan's
six southernmost provinces, nearly 220,000 square kilometres of the
most rugged and dangerous terrain in the country, senior officers
with the Canadian battle group say the Taliban have good reason to
steer clear of the Canadians.

"They ought to be afraid," said Major Bill Fletcher, the commander
of the Canadian battle group's Charlie Company, nicknamed the
Grizzlies. "Our presence alone should be enough to make them think
twice."

The "red-dogs" label was meant as an insult - military intelligence
officers and local Afghans say the Taliban call Americans Sara Khara
or "red donkeys" - but it also carries more than a little respect,
since many of the dogs around Kandahar are huge Afghan hounds, bred
for fighting.

Fletcher's unit will be part of a joint brigade of Canadian, British
and Dutch troops which will spread across the southern half of
Afghanistan, home to the Taliban, their al-Qaida allies, gangs of
drug-runners and hundreds of local warlords.

Brig.-Gen. David Fraser will take formal command of the
multinational brigade in a ceremony today, but the 2,200 Canadians
under his command have already started patrolling deep into their
area of responsibility. British soldiers have begun to arrive in
Helmand province, a centre of poppy growing and the opium trade just
west of Kandahar, and a Dutch battalion is due to hit the ground in
the early spring.

The Canadians have already pushed into the districts north of
Kandahar and begun forcing the insurgents further back into the
mountains.

In response, the Taliban have launched a handful of attacks against
the Canadians - roadside bombings, rocket-propelled grenade attacks
and attempted ambushes in the rough hills and mountains north of the
city of Kandahar - which Fletcher said were likely attempts to test
the new coalition soldiers in the area.

A roadside bomb planted two weeks ago barely dented a Canadian LAV
III, the 17-tonne armoured troop carrier the Princess Patricia's
Canadian Light Infantry battle group is using to patrol isolated
mountain roads, and left four soldiers with only minor injuries.
When the insurgents attempted to plant a more powerful bomb the next
day, the Canadians caught the bomber in the act and drove him off
with machine-gun fire.

An attack on a Canadian base north of Kandahar a few days later was
met with an immediate barrage of artillery "illumination rounds" and
rifle fire that sent the Taliban gunmen fleeing.

And an attempted ambush this weekend just outside the main coalition
base failed when a roadside bomb did not detonate and a rocket-
propelled grenade left one soldier with minor wounds.

This summer, the mission will switch from American command - part of
Operation Enduring Freedom - to being part of the NATO-led
International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and Taliban leaders
expected the NATO soldiers to be easier opponents than the Americans.

But weapons such as the new M777 long-range howitzer and the well-
armed LAV III have made an impression on the Afghans as well as the
well-trained Canadian troops.

Col. Chris Vernon, the British chief of staff for the multinational
brigade, said: "We are keen to dispel the notion that the Americans
are leaving and that what is replacing them will be weaker," he said.

"Clearly, the Canadians are not weaker."

Vernon said the hand-off of authority to NATO is not "an American
cut and run. A lot of the combat power in the area is still U.S."

"They're still a big part of this coalition."

But now, the Canadians are moving into the front lines.

Lt.-Col. Ian Hope, commander of the 950-strong Canadian battle group
code-named Task Force Orion, has divided his force into three parts:
two companies of mechanized infantry will patrol the dangerous area
north and east of Kandahar and another company will run the
provincial reconstruction team in the city of Kandahar and act as a
mobile reserve - a quick reaction force which can be rushed to
trouble spots.

Each of his line companies: Alpha Company, nicknamed the Red Devils,
and The Grizzlies of Charlie Company, are drawn from 1st Battalion
PPCLI, reinforced by the guns of the Royal Canadian Horse Artillery,
military police, engineers, civil-military co-operation cells and
other support units.

That has swelled the ranks of the two line companies from about 100
soldiers to nearly 200, creating a pair of "mini-battle groups" to
patrol the vast area for which the Canadians are responsible.

In the coming weeks the Canadians will expand their patrol area even
more, sending Fletcher's soldiers east to the Afghan-Pakistan
border, another hotbed of Taliban and warlord activity. "There's a
whole ridgeline through the area that pretty much delineates the
Afghan-Pakistan border and their lines of movement between their
sanctuaries and wherever they're basing their operations in the rest
of Afghanistan," he said. "We're going to be trying to interdict the
enemy's movements . . . we want to restrict their freedom to
manoeuvre."

The Canadians will establish forward operating bases, or FOBs, in
the centre of their patrol area, a permanent presence designed to
convince local residents the coalition troops are here to stay and
to intimidate the Taliban.

"By our presence we'll be disrupting their movements . . . and
instilling confidence in the local leaders that the bad guys can't
come in and coerce the population," said Fletcher.

Vernon said the long-term goal is "marginalizing the Taliban,"
forcing them out of regions where they once operated openly and
pushing them further away from populated areas. "That will hearten
the local population," he said. "Which will further marginalize the
Taliban."


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42412 From: Emilia Curia Finnica Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
Salvete Merula et omnes,

Thank you! I'm very happy that you have liked our design for the
calendar!

For anyone who hasn't yet ordered one, we now have the option of
posting in 1st class, which is much faster.


On Mar 1, 2006, at 3:29, Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com wrote:

> Message: 18
> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:03:28 +0000
> From: "Kirsteen Wright" <kirsteen.falconsfan@...>
> Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
>
> On 2/28/06, Peter Bird <p.bird@...> wrote:
>>
>> Salve Servili et salvete omnes -
>>
>> I've had my calendar for some time and it's superb! Not only is it
>> most
>> informative, but it is elegant also. Congratulations to the designers.
>>
>> Sextus Pontius Pilatus Barbatus
>
>
> Yes I agree It's beautiful. I hope they continue to produce them for
> next
> year
>
> Merula
>
> --
> Chaos, confusion, disorder - my work here is done

Valete,

Emilia Curia Finnica
Custos
Scriba Araniae Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
Senatrix
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42413 From: Nathan Guiboche Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
Salve QFM
I have many friends in "The Gan" right now, and I will be there myself in a
little over a year from now.... I wish them all well..
Vale
Sertorius

From: <QFabiusMaxmi@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
>I wanted to show this to the Canadians on the list, to show your current
> involvement in
> the "War against Terror" You have our thanks.
> Q. Fabius Maximus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42414 From: Brooke Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: New to Group!
Hello!! My name is Brooke and I am new to this group. I have taken
on the task of writing on the Pagan Roman Religion and I must say it
has been more complicated then I first anticipated!! Not that I am
complaining, it is a wonderful journey that I have embarked upon to
say the least. However, I am still a newcomer to the mechanisms of
paganism in the first place and this is almost overwhelming for me.

Like I said earlier I have taken on the task of writing and giving
information to the public about the pagan roman religion for a local
pagan community of mine...our web address is here:
http://www.aupagans.org/index.php

In the paths section you will find Romana. I was wondering if I
could perhaps receive the help of this group in order
to "accurately" portray your beliefs and practices. Any help at all
will be greatly appreciated!!!! Soon a little of what I have been
working on will be put on the website, or you can repost here if you
would like a copy of what I have put together in order to see where
I need to make changes.

Thanks ahead of time!!

MotherEarthDreamer!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42415 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: New to Group!
Salve!

You might try our group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/ .

Some great people are there, well, here too, but that is the focus of
that list, plus the archives are great.

optime vale in pace deorum

Marcus Lucretius Agricola



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Brooke" <motherearthdreamer@...> wrote:
>
> Hello!! My name is Brooke and I am new to this group. I have taken
> on the task of writing on the Pagan Roman Religion and I must say it
> has been more complicated then I first anticipated!! Not that I am
> complaining, it is a wonderful journey that I have embarked upon to
> say the least. However, I am still a newcomer to the mechanisms of
> paganism in the first place and this is almost overwhelming for me.
>
> Like I said earlier I have taken on the task of writing and giving
> information to the public about the pagan roman religion for a local
> pagan community of mine...our web address is here:
> http://www.aupagans.org/index.php
>
> In the paths section you will find Romana. I was wondering if I
> could perhaps receive the help of this group in order
> to "accurately" portray your beliefs and practices. Any help at all
> will be greatly appreciated!!!! Soon a little of what I have been
> working on will be put on the website, or you can repost here if you
> would like a copy of what I have put together in order to see where
> I need to make changes.
>
> Thanks ahead of time!!
>
> MotherEarthDreamer!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42416 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Establishment of Nova Roma Wiki
A. Apollonius Decio Junio omnibusque sal.

> That's true, however Fuscus may have a point. Is
> this an administrative
> change or a policy change? If it's a policy change,
> then the senate
> *must* be involved as only the senate can set
> policy.

While I agree that it's almost always a good idea to
consult the senate, and indeed it makes a lot of sense
in this case, I must just make one small correction:
the senate is not the only constitutional organ which
can set policy.

Historically, in fact, the senate could not
technically create policy at all: it could only
recommend policy. In practice, of course, its
recommendations were very often followed, especially
in areas in which it was important for policy to be
consistent from one year to the next since, as you
rightly say, magistrates of annual tenure are not
well-equipped to do this.

This historical position is somewhat modified
(unnecessarily, in my view) by the lex constitutiva,
which gives senatus consulta legal force and states
that the senate is "the supreme policy-making
authority". But it is a giant leap from "supreme
policy-making authority" to "*only* policy-making
authority".

Magistrates can certainly make policy. As you say they
cannot guarantee that their policies will last beyond
their own term of office; but to reduce magistrates,
including magistrates with imperium (the highest power
in the Roman constitution below the majestas populi
Romani), to mere administrative officials with no
competence to make decisions of political importance
is quite out of line both with Roman tradition and
with our lex constitutiva. Moreover, policy can also
of course be made by the assembled populus in the form
of leges and plebiscita.

But, as I say, in this particular case I agree that
some consultation of the senate would be appropriate,
if only to give the policy some chance of outlasting
the year. But the year is far from over, and it may be
beneficial for the relevant magistrates to work with
the project for a few months before presenting any
formal proposals to the senate.



___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Photos – NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 8p a photo http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42417 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: [NRCollegiumPontificum] Edictum Consulare Regarding Edictum dat
CN·SALVIVS·ASTVR·PONTIFICIBVS·S·P·D

Pontifex et Consul C. Fabius Buteo Modianus scripsit:

> Regarding Edictum dated February 18, 2006.
>
> Ex Officio
>
> I hereby withdraw my previous edictum regarding Flavius Vedius
> Germanicus as an Augur of Nova Roma. I stand firm that it was within
> the law to reaffirm the status of Vedius as an Augur, however, in
> order to maintain concordia within Nova Roma I withdraw said Edictum.
> The status of Vedius as an augur is being deliberated within the
> Collegium Pontificum and I trust the Pontifices will find a suitable
> solution.
>
> Dated XXVII February 11:10 AM Roman time, issued officially in the
> consulship of Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus and Pompeia Minucia Strabo.

[...]

I understand very well the line of reasoning that took him to affirm
Vedius' status as augur, according to Roman law. I know that there was
no ill intention in any of his actions. I think that he made just one
mistake: acting without requesting the previous opinion of the bodies
that have authority (auctoritas) in that particular business.

However, by having the courage to trace back his steps and to correct
his mistake, our consul has made up for his previous fault and has
proved that he is precisely the kind of person we need to have in
charge; someone ready to listen to what others have to say, someone
ready to make the right thing even at a personal price.

Today is a good day for Nova Roma. Our consul has faced a challenge,
and he has arisen to meet the challenge. Congratulations.

S·V·B·E·E·V

CN·SALVIVS·T·F·A·NEP·OVF·ASTVR·SCRIPSIT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42418 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
Salve Quinte Fabi Maxime,

Thank you for thinking of our country and posting this article.

Regards,

QSP






--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
>
> I wanted to show this to the Canadians on the list, to show your
current
> involvement in
> the "War against Terror" You have our thanks.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42419 From: Gaius Asinius Pollio Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Salve

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> I think it's best just to let this one go :-)

You may, but I won't. It's an abyss, 2000 years deep. Once you dare to look it won't let you
go.

Vale

C. Asinius Pollio


http://www.carotta.de/subseite/texte/jwc_e/contents.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42420 From: Marcus Iulius Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Elezione dei nuovi Aediles Urbis/ election of the new Aediles Urbis
M IVL PERVSIANVS ET DOM CONST FVSCVS AED VRBIS FR APVLO CAESARI PROPRAETORI ITALIAE OMNISBVSQVE SPD

In ottemperanza a quanto stabilito dall'Edictum Propraetoricium XV DE VRBE ROMAE RATA HABENDA, si sono svolti Venerdi' 24/02/2006 a Roma, i Comitia per l'elezioni degli Aediles Urbis per l'anno 2006.

Erano presenti i seguenti 5 cives Novaromani dei 6 iscritti all'Album Civium dell'Urbe:

1. Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
2. Marcus Iulius Perusianus
3. Marcus Quirinus Sulla
4. Publius Flavius Caesar
5. Caius Ianus Flaminius

Marcus Iulius Perusianus ha assunto la Presidenza dell'Assemblea e Domitius Constantinus Fuscus ha svolto le funzioni di Rogator.

All'apertura dell'Assemblea Marcus Quirinus Sulla e Caius Ianus Flaminius si sono candidati alle cariche.

Marcus Quirinus Sulla e Caius Ianus Flaminius sono risultati vincitori delle elezioni e assumono il titolo di Aediles Urbis a partire dal 1 Marzo 2006.

DABAM ROMAE A.D.KAL MARTIIS ANNVS 2759 AVC
(Roma, 01/03/2006).


M IVL PERVSIANVS ET DOM CONST FVSCVS AED VRBIS FR APVLO CAESARI PROPRAETORI ITALIAE OMNISBVSQVE SPD

avete,

according to Edictum Propraetoricium Italiae XV DE VRBE ROMAE RATA HABENDA,
the meeting for the elections of the new Aediles Urbis was held, on Feb 24 2006, in Rome.
The following 5 NR citizens (out of 6, according to the Album Civium Urbis)
were present:

1. Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
2. Marcus Iulius Perusianus
3. Marcus Quirinus Sulla
4. Publius Flavius Caesar
5. Caius Ianus Flaminius

Marcus Iulius Perusianus was appointed as Presidente dell'Assemblea (President of the Assembly) and Domitius Constantinus Fuscus as Rogator.

At the very beginning Marcus Quirinus Sulla and Caius Ianus Flaminius declared their candidacies.

Marcus Quirinus Sulla and Caius Ianus Flaminius were elected and appointed as Aediles Urbis.


DABAM ROMAE A.D.KAL MARTIIS ANNVS 2759 AVC
(Rome, 03/01/2006).

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42421 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Alkeehol & other adult topics
F. Galerius Aurelianus S.P.D.

I agree that the thread should be dropped or moved to a more liberal venue. However, I would like to point out that many of us were young once. Whether anyone likes to admit it anymore, those who are not yet legal (a.k.a. teenagers and those 20-21) have always wanted to do the things that adults do--namely drink, smoke, drive, have lots of money (by their reckoning), and want to fool around (take that anyway you like). Whether we talk about it or not, young'uns is gonna be thinkin' about it and wantin' to do it. Even the ones that were raised right is gonna be thinkin' thoughts that there parents would prefer they didn't think about much less act on.
So for any old fogeys who think that not talkin' about something is gonna have any gen-u-ine effect on the young folks thinkins' and doins', ya'll is living in another world apart from this 'un.

<snip>
It seems that some people just CAN¹T take hints.
FGA: We can take a hint, but we might just choose to ignore it iffen it comes across as sanctimonius claptrap
Guys, this is not a tavern (though I understand that there is a virtual NR tavern somewhere on
Yahoo). This is a list devoted to subjects concerning ancient Rome, and those related thereto.
FGA: Actually this is a list about Nova Roma which has somethings to do with an on-line organization for those interested in Ancient Rome and some modern application.
Occasional excursions to macro world politics et al. are
permitted. This, however, has nothing to do with such subjects, which may be
of legitimate interest to adolescents even though they aren¹t old enough to
vote. Drinking, however, is something forbidden to adolescents, but
attractive to them, and is not something to be praised here, or to be the
subject of instruction here. Not only do we have minors here who are legally
not adult, we also have those who are technically adult who are BELOW the
legal drinking age, which is 21 in the US and, so far as I know, 19 in Canada.
Yahoo rules forbid us from doing anything harmful to minors<and drinking is
not only harmful to minors (and to adults if done in excess), it is ILLEGAL
for them. It is also illegal for younger technical adults<with good reason,
since physiology is involved in the ability to process alcohol. Moreover,
civilized adults do not drink to the point of drunkenness, nor do they consume
large quantities of the stuff. They may have some wine with dinner, or drink
a beer; they may use wine or beer in cooking (I do; I made coq au vin a few
days ago). They might even take some ron Bacardi or whatever occasionally<but
they DON¹T drink to excess. Now, I do agree with M. Cassius Philippus about
the taste of Scotch...

Please drop this thread. You are giving a very bad example to the younger
members of the list, and to the newbies, who must think that NR is composed of
a bunch of drunks.

FGA: Hey this thread can't be any more of a bad example than some of the political discussions. Besides, society needs a few bad examples.

ATS

> ================================
>
Scotch? If I wanted the taste of bog in my rye whisky, I would drink Scotch
but otherwise "No." As a famous person once said, "Scotch? It was inwented
by a little old lady in Leningrad!"

FGA: This remark was made before we was warned about the thread being any appropriate. Besides, it's a Star Trek quote.

Aurelianus



Valete


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42422 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Elezione dei nuovi Aediles Urbis/ election of the new Aediles U
SALVETE !

Marcus Iulius <m_iulius@...> wrote:

Marcus Quirinus Sulla and Caius Ianus Flaminius were elected and appointed as Aediles Urbis.>>>

Congratulations to both elected Aediles Urbis. I still remember the wonderful Quirinus Sulla's historical materials from Rome and Ostia.

VALETE,
IVL SABINVS








NOVA ROMANI !
Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support page to your websites.
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm

"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------
Brings words and photos together (easily) with
PhotoMail - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42423 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Do ex-Boni drink wine from lead cups?
Salve, Apolloni Corde.

A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
> I call it that because in my view it is a party, in
> the sense that it is an association with political
> objectives. I don't accept your assertion that a party
> must be:

I could agree to your non-acceptance of the first two points, even if
they are prevalent in most political parties, but the last point is part
of the dictionary definition. Whether or not you accept it has little
bearing on common perceived reality.

A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
> There were groups in the British Parliament in the
> nineteenth century which had none of these features
> but which are described by all historians as parties.

The current definition of a political party differs somewhat from that
of the nineteenth century, as I am sure you already know.

A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
> I think my message made it perfectly clear that I do
> not consider any of the current parties particularly
> organized or monolithic - in fact I think I said that
> quite specifically. My point was simply that if you
> join something which looks like a political party you
> can't complain if people assume you're a member of a
> political party.

No, I can't complain that they make the assumption, but I can complain
if they refuse to accept explanations as to the actuality of the matter.
You, among others, steadfastly call the Libra Alliance something it is
not, a political party, in spite of multiple attempts to correct you.

A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
> The fact that you have frequently felt the need to
> write to this forum explaining in detail why Libra is
> not a political party proves the point: it is not at
> all obvious to the casual observer that it is not a
> political party, or else you wouldn't have to say so.

I have noted that these explanations aren't necessary for new citizens,
who don't know what the Libra Alliance is, but rather for old ones who
should know better - yet even after these explanations refuse to accept
a less loaded and more accurate descriptor.

A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
> In any case, I don't much care what you call it in
> English. What matters is that it is, like the 'Boni'
> and other such groups, something the Romans never had,
> would never have had, and would probably have regarded
> as a conjuratio contra rem publicam.

This is a rather grave accusation. If this is something you believe to
have any basis in reality, I ask you as Praetor of Nova Roma to please
submit the matter to me and my colleague for consideration. If not, then
never make accusations of this nature again, or I will file charges for
slander.

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42424 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Do ex-Boni drink wine from lead cups?
If "political party" is deemed perjoritive, may I suggest "political
faction" instead. The definition is looser and surely no one can argue that
the Romans didn't have factions.

--
>|P. Dominus Antonius|<
Tony Dah m

Oderint dum metuant - Cicero
Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius


On 3/3/06, Kristoffer From <from@...> wrote:
>
> Salve, Apolloni Corde.
>
>
> A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
> > I call it that because in my view it is a party, in
> > the sense that it is an association with political
> > objectives. I don't accept your assertion that a party
> > must be:
>
> I could agree to your non-acceptance of the first two points, even if
> they are prevalent in most political parties, but the last point is part
> of the dictionary definition. Whether or not you accept it has little
> bearing on common perceived reality.
>
>
> A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
> > There were groups in the British Parliament in the
> > nineteenth century which had none of these features
> > but which are described by all historians as parties.
>
> The current definition of a political party differs somewhat from that
> of the nineteenth century, as I am sure you already know.
>
>
> A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
> > I think my message made it perfectly clear that I do
> > not consider any of the current parties particularly
> > organized or monolithic - in fact I think I said that
> > quite specifically. My point was simply that if you
> > join something which looks like a political party you
> > can't complain if people assume you're a member of a
> > political party.
>
> No, I can't complain that they make the assumption, but I can complain
> if they refuse to accept explanations as to the actuality of the matter.
> You, among others, steadfastly call the Libra Alliance something it is
> not, a political party, in spite of multiple attempts to correct you.
>
>
> A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
> > The fact that you have frequently felt the need to
> > write to this forum explaining in detail why Libra is
> > not a political party proves the point: it is not at
> > all obvious to the casual observer that it is not a
> > political party, or else you wouldn't have to say so.
>
> I have noted that these explanations aren't necessary for new citizens,
> who don't know what the Libra Alliance is, but rather for old ones who
> should know better - yet even after these explanations refuse to accept
> a less loaded and more accurate descriptor.
>
>
> A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
> > In any case, I don't much care what you call it in
> > English. What matters is that it is, like the 'Boni'
> > and other such groups, something the Romans never had,
> > would never have had, and would probably have regarded
> > as a conjuratio contra rem publicam.
>
> This is a rather grave accusation. If this is something you believe to
> have any basis in reality, I ask you as Praetor of Nova Roma to please
> submit the matter to me and my colleague for consideration. If not, then
> never make accusations of this nature again, or I will file charges for
> slander.
>
> Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42425 From: caiusmoraviusbrutus Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Problems With The Term Judeo - Christian
Salve Triari!

Well...you're not wrong in that there certainly was repression and
the ancestors of the Parsees did flee Persia to escape this. The
conversion to Islam was, however quite gradual. The fact is that at
different times in history the attitude towards Zoroastrianism varied
from acceptance to tolerance to outright repression. I understand
that now things are rather bad and have been since the Islamic
Revolution.

You are also correct that although "People of the Book" have a higher
status than Pagans they are certainly not seen as being on a level
with Muslims. I have noticed that adherents of each of the three
religions tend to accept some sort of kinship with each other while
assuming that their particular sect is in some way more advanced or
morally superior to the other two. Here in England they are generally
too polite (and too worried about our new religious hatred laws!!!!)
to say so out loud but you can tell they are thinking it!

With regards to your point re Islam as an ethnic Arab faith. I gather
Muslims have never had quite the same view of race as we have today.
If I recall correctly, under the Ottomans one's race was determined
by religion rather than by ethnicity. Thus a Balkan Muslim for
example would be treated as a Turk or an Arab while a Christian from
the same village would be treated as a Latin or a Greek depending on
his denomination. I must say I'm on slightly shaky ground here so if
anyone else knows more about this I'd be glad of your input.

Vale

Caius Moravius Brutus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, dicconf <dicconf@...> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, caiusmoraviusbrutus wrote:
>
> > While the Arabic term Ahl al Kitab "people of the book" did
> > originally refer specifically to Muslims, Christians and Jews it
was
> > applied to Zoroastrians after the Islamic conquest/conversion of
> > Iran. This was presumably to ease the assimilation of the general
> > population much in the same way that the Christians in the west
did
> > by adopting our feast days and much of our imagery.
> >
> > There would have been a need to reach some sort of accomodation
with
> > the followers of Zoroaster as, I believe, "people of the book"
have a
> > rather different - and superior - status from Pagans under Islamic
> > law.
>
> Then I misunderstood some earlier history. I understood that,
while the
> Muslims extended tolerance (in return for heavier taxes) toward
Christians
> and Jews, treating Islam as an ethnic Arabic faith, they changed
this
> policy to active repression after the conquest of Persia, where
> Zoroastrians were compelled to convert or flee the country (to
India,
> where they still exist as Parsee). Thanks for this correction.
> -- Publ;ius Livius Triarius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42426 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Alkeehol & other adult topics
Are we allowed to discuss Star Trek as it relates to Rome or Nova Roma. If
I recall they drank Alcohol on Star Trek and I don't think anyone ever said
that Star Trek was bad for the chitlens. Then again Capt Kirk occasionally
was excessively friendly to lovely blue alien ladies. ;-)

Come on wasn't the Roman episode one of everyone's favorite episodes?
--
>|P. Dominus Antonius|<
Tony Dah m

Oderint dum metuant - Cicero
Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius

On 3/3/06, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...> wrote:
>
> F. Galerius Aurelianus S.P.D.
>
> Scotch? If I wanted the taste of bog in my rye whisky, I would drink
> Scotch
> but otherwise "No." As a famous person once said, "Scotch? It was
> inwented
> by a little old lady in Leningrad!"
>
> FGA: This remark was made before we was warned about the thread being any
> appropriate. Besides, it's a Star Trek quote.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42427 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: a.d. V Non. Mar.
OSD C. equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem V Nones Martias; haec dies comitialis est.

"He [Numa Pompilius] appointed two additional Flamens, one for Mars,
the other for Quirinus, and also chose virgins as priestesses to
Vesta. This order of priestesses came into existence originally in
Alba and was connected with the race of the founder. He assigned them
a public stipend that they might give their whole time to the temple,
and made their persons sacred and inviolable by a vow of chastity and
other religious sanctions. Similarly he chose twelve `Salii' for Mars
Gradivus, and assigned to them the distinctive dress of an embroidered
tunic and over it a brazen cuirass. They were instructed to march in
solemn procession through the City, carrying the twelve shields called
the `Ancilia,' and singing hymns accompanied by a solemn dance in
triple time." - Livy, History of Rome 1.20

Jupiter, make true the words of your pledge.'
As he [Numa Pompilius] spoke, the sun's full disc appeared,
And a loud crash came from the depths of the sky.
Three times the god thundered, and hurled his lightning,
From cloudless air, believe what I say, wonderful but true.
The sky began to split open at the zenith:
The crowd and its leader lifted their eyes.
Behold, a shield fell, trembling in the light breeze.
The sound of the crowd's shouting reached the stars.
The king first sacrificed a heifer that had never known
The yoke, then raised the gift from the ground,
And called it ancile, because it was cut away (recisum)
All round, and there wasn't a single angle to note.
Then, remembering the empire's fate was involved,
He thought of a very cunning idea.
He ordered many shields cut in the same shape,
In order to confuse the eyes of any traitor.
Mamurius carried out the task: whether he was superior
In his craft or his character it would be hard to say.
Gracious Numa said to him: `Ask a reward for your work,
You'll not ask in vain of one known for honesty.'
He'd already given the Salii, named from their leaping (saltus),
Weapons: and words to be sung to a certain tune." - Ovid, Fasti III

"The sixth division of his religious institutions was devoted to those
the Romans call Salii, whom Numa himself appointed out of the
patricians, choosing twelve young men of the most graceful appearance.
These are the Salii whose holy things are deposited on the Palatine
hill and who are themselves called the (Salii) Palatini; for the
(Salii) Agonales, by some called the Salii Collini, the repository of
whose holy things is on the Quirinal Hill, were appointed after Numa's
time by King Hostilius, in pursuance of a vow he had made in the war
against the Sabines. All these Salii are a kind of dancers and singers
of hymns in praise of the gods of war. Their festival falls about the
time of the Panathenaea, in the month which they call March, and is
celebrated at the public expense for many days, during which they
proceed through the city with their dances to the Forum and to the
Capitol and to many other places both private and public. They wear
embroidered tunics girt about with wide girdles of bronze, and over
these are fastened, with brooches, robes striped with scarlet and
bordered with purple, which they call trabeae; this garment is
peculiar to the Romans and a mark of the greatest honour. On their
heads they wear apices, as they are called, that is, high caps
contracted into the shape of a cone, which the Greeks call kyrbasiai.
They have each of them a sword hanging at their girdle and in their
right hand they hold a spear or a staff or something else of the sort,
and on their left arm a Thracian buckler,which resembles a
lozenge-shaped shield with its sides drawn in, such as those are said
to carry who among the Greeks perform the sacred rites of the Curetes.
And, in my opinion at least, the Salii, if the word be translated into
Greek, are Curetes, whom, because they are kouroi or "young men," we
call by that name from their age, whereas the Romans call them Salii
from their lively motions. For to leap and skip is by them called
salire; and for the same reason they call all other dancers
saltatores, deriving their name from the Salii, because their dancing
also is attended by much leaping and capering. Whether I have been
well advised or not in giving them this appellation, anyone who
pleases may gather from their actions. For they execute their
movements in arms, keeping time to a flute, sometimes all together,
sometimes by turns, and while dancing sing certain traditional hymns.
But this dance and exercise performed by armed men and the noise they
make by striking their bucklers with their daggers, if we may base any
conjectures on the ancient accounts, was originated by the Curetes." -
Dionysius of Halicarnassus, 2.70

The festival of Mars was celebrated by the Salii on the 1st of March
and for several successive days; on which occasion they were
accustomed to go through the city in their official dress carrying the
ancilia in their left hands or suspended from their shoulders, and at
the same time singing and dancing. In the dance they struck the
shields with rods or weapons so as to keep time with their voices and
with the movements of the dance.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Livy, Dionysius of Halicarnassus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42428 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Do ex-Boni drink wine from lead cups?
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, P. Dominus Antonius wrote:

> If "political party" is deemed perjoritive, may I suggest "political
> faction" instead. The definition is looser and surely no one can argue that
> the Romans didn't have factions.

Unfortunately, "faction" is also a pejorative. (Dr. Johnson's Dictionary:
"WHIG: The name of a faction.") So, by association, is "political" --
could we just say "group"? Almost every other term for a discreet part of
an overall body ("clique", for instance) has been used invidiously,
usually to suggest that the part is somehow sinister in intent.

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42429 From: André Cidade Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Salvete omnes,

I rather agree with Equitius Cato, and belive that it would be best to let
this one go, but I have just one warning for those that are considering the
possibility of taking this study too seriously (we should take it seriously
actually, this is just a warning). This is exactly what you shouldn't write
on the introduction to a serious debate:

"The results of this iinvestigation are not a matter of debate anyway, and
being objective facts cannot be argued away"

This is written on the introduction, right before he begins to point out
reasons why "the disclosure presented here has not spread like wildfire, or
why the whole world is not talking about it"

This is only a warning regarding the approach to the object taken by the
author, not an attack on its contents (though I have something to say about
that as well, I rather agree with Cato, we ought to let this one go).
Sincerely,

Publius Arminius Celsus.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42430 From: Gaius Asinius Pollio Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Salve

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Andr� Cidade" <andrecidade@...> wrote:
> This is exactly what you shouldn't write
> on the introduction to a serious debate:
>
> "The results of this investigation are not a matter of debate anyway, and
> being objective facts cannot be argued away"

Read on and you'll know what Carotta means: his book is in many parts a work of
observation, not a theory that has to be debated. If you measure the light of the stars
during an eclipse, you can show - as an objective fact - that the sun as a large
gravitational body bends the light. That's what Carotta means by "objective facts": he
investigates, he observes, he doesn't assume.

But on the other hand the way gravitational forces influence light may be a matter of
debate, the formulas behind a phenomenon. Same with Carotta: that Jesus is the Divus
Iulius (incognito) is a fact. What needs to be debated is exactly "how" and "why" it
happened.

> This is only a warning regarding the approach to the object taken by the
> author, not an attack on its contents (though I have something to say about
> that as well

Then say it. There are already two people who offered to join a debate.

> I rather agree with Cato, we ought to let this one go.

Why? Neither you nor Cato have given any reason. Not that you need to, but I'm a curious
person. ;-)

Vale
C. Asinius Pollio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42431 From: Brooke Dunlap Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: New to Group!
Thank-you very much!!



On 3/3/06, M. Lucretius Agricola <wm_hogue@...> wrote:
>
> Salve!
>
> You might try our group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/ .
>
> Some great people are there, well, here too, but that is the focus of
> that list, plus the archives are great.
>
> optime vale in pace deorum
>
> Marcus Lucretius Agricola
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Brooke" <motherearthdreamer@...> wrote:
> >
> > Hello!! My name is Brooke and I am new to this group. I have taken
> > on the task of writing on the Pagan Roman Religion and I must say it
> > has been more complicated then I first anticipated!! Not that I am
> > complaining, it is a wonderful journey that I have embarked upon to
> > say the least. However, I am still a newcomer to the mechanisms of
> > paganism in the first place and this is almost overwhelming for me.
> >
> > Like I said earlier I have taken on the task of writing and giving
> > information to the public about the pagan roman religion for a local
> > pagan community of mine...our web address is here:
> > http://www.aupagans.org/index.php
> >
> > In the paths section you will find Romana. I was wondering if I
> > could perhaps receive the help of this group in order
> > to "accurately" portray your beliefs and practices. Any help at all
> > will be greatly appreciated!!!! Soon a little of what I have been
> > working on will be put on the website, or you can repost here if you
> > would like a copy of what I have put together in order to see where
> > I need to make changes.
> >
> > Thanks ahead of time!!
> >
> > MotherEarthDreamer!
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Roman+empire&w2=Ancient+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+roman+empire&c=5&s=113&.sig=V_ohQEPlKSUophzoyeKo7A> Ancient
> history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Roman+empire&w2=Ancient+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+roman+empire&c=5&s=113&.sig=qUOMYbt4Zn7Yl_BI9eyvCA> Citizenship
> test<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Citizenship+test&w1=Roman+empire&w2=Ancient+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+roman+empire&c=5&s=113&.sig=i89al2nzLhouXVUtOu-wDQ> Fall
> of the roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Roman+empire&w2=Ancient+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+roman+empire&c=5&s=113&.sig=cvvUbwFz4SII0tNReHlQkw> The
> roman empire<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+roman+empire&w1=Roman+empire&w2=Ancient+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+roman+empire&c=5&s=113&.sig=o0D-t5cCQCdxurytCXSC7Q>
> ------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> - Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>"
> on the web.
>
> - To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> - Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42432 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
veletudo omnes;

On 3/2/06, QFabiusMaxmi@... <QFabiusMaxmi@...> wrote:
> I wanted to show this to the Canadians on the list, to show your current
> involvement in
> the "War against Terror" You have our thanks.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
> In a message dated 2/28/2006 2:55:38 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> moderncrossfire@yahoogroups.com writes:
>
> KANDAHAR, Afghanistan - They call them "sura espiyan," Pashtun for "red
> dogs," and the LAV III armoured vehicles are "bala," or "monsters."
>
> [respectful excision]
>

In deed, thank you to our friends and allies of Canada!!!

Sertorius, may That Which Is Holy watch over
and keep you and your comrades safe when you are in harm's way.

=========================================
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus

Veteran: PFC Vermont Army National Guard - SSgt USAF Reserve
Whose great grandmother Robinson's maiden name was Allard,
being a woman of Acadian-Miqmaq and Mohawk parentage.

http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42433 From: Sertorius Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
Salve SUVP
Thank you for your concern, especially since we have suffered casualties in
the last two days, and I known most of those injured.... We have a small
army, and everyone knows everyone else (especially in the Infantry)...
Vale
Sertorius

From: "S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus" <wend1066@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
> veletudo omnes;
> In deed, thank you to our friends and allies of Canada!!!
> Sertorius, may That Which Is Holy watch over
> and keep you and your comrades safe when you are in harm's way.
> =========================================
> In amicitia quod fides -
> Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42434 From: albmd323232 Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: History Channel now!
All evening there are programs about Ancient Rome on the History
Channel. Its really interesting, and I highly recommend everyone to
start watching it if they can.

D.C.A.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42435 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-03-03
Subject: Re: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
---

Salve Veni et Salvete Omnes:

As a Canukian I thank you very much...our boys and girls have been
at this in 'Stan' since 2001. Operation Apollo, Operation Athena,
etc. That's us. We tend to lean to the Greek with our Military
mission nomenclature, ...but we fight like Romans when we have to.

It's like Taliban... like....take off, ok?
(The MacKenzie Brothers)
Canukians 'keep their stick on the ice'
(Red Green)

Hey, this is not just military, this is 'culture' up here!

Pompeia :)
(Proud to be the first Roman Canadian Consul of Nova Roma)

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus"
<wend1066@...> wrote:
>
> veletudo omnes;
>
> On 3/2/06, QFabiusMaxmi@... <QFabiusMaxmi@...> wrote:
> > I wanted to show this to the Canadians on the list, to show your
current
> > involvement in
> > the "War against Terror" You have our thanks.
> >
> > Q. Fabius Maximus
> >
> > In a message dated 2/28/2006 2:55:38 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> > moderncrossfire@yahoogroups.com writes:
> >
> > KANDAHAR, Afghanistan - They call them "sura espiyan," Pashtun
for "red
> > dogs," and the LAV III armoured vehicles are "bala,"
or "monsters."
> >
> > [respectful excision]
> >
>
> In deed, thank you to our friends and allies of Canada!!!
>
> Sertorius, may That Which Is Holy watch over
> and keep you and your comrades safe when you are in harm's way.
>
> =========================================
> In amicitia quod fides -
> Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
>
> Veteran: PFC Vermont Army National Guard - SSgt USAF Reserve
> Whose great grandmother Robinson's maiden name was Allard,
> being a woman of Acadian-Miqmaq and Mohawk parentage.
>
> http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
> --
> May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42436 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-04
Subject: THE CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR MARCH 3, 2006 (2759)
CONVENING OF THE SENATE – March 3, 2006

The Senate is called to order Friday, March 3, 2006 (2759) by
Consul Pompeia Minucia Strabo.

The Contio (discussion) shall begin tomorrow, Saturday March 4,
2006
(2759) at 2400 hrs Roman Time and shall terminate Wednesday March
8, 2006 (2759) at 2400 hrs Roman Time.

Voting shall then commence immediately thereafter and shall
continue
until Sunday March 12, 2006 (2759) at 2400 hrs Roman Time.:

Voting shall end on Sunday March 12 at 2400 hours Rome time


The agenda is as follows: ( There are a total of 16 (XVI) items for
consideration):


Item I: The revised budged for Nova Roma for 2759 A.U.C. shall be
adopted, accommodating the move of 120.00 reserved for Aquila
website expenditures ( deemed not required this year) to begin
funding of Outreach Projects to promote Nova Roma profit margins
for
organizational growth, said allocations at the Senate's discretion.

The following Propraetores/Propraetrices have indicated to the
Consuls and/or to the Senate their desire to be prorogued by Feb.
15
of this year as requested (link provided to edictum below):

Item II Franciscus Apulus Caesar is to be prorogued as Propraetor
Italia.

Item III G. Cornelius Lentulus is to be prorogued as Propraetor
Pannonia.

Item IV Titus Iulius Sabinus is to be prorogued as Propraetor
Dacia.

Item V C. Arminius Reccanellus is to be prorogued as Propraetor
Brasilia.

Item VI M. Curiatius Complutensis is to be prorogued as Propraetor
Hispania.

Item VII Pompeia Minucia Strabo is to be prorogued as Propraetrix
Canada Orientalis.

Item VIII Sextus Apollonius Scipio is to be prorogued as
Propraetor
Gallia.

Item IX Caius Curius Saturninus is to be prorogued as Propraetor
Thule.

Item X Salvia Sempronia Graccha Valentia is to be prorogued
Propraetrix America Media Occidentalis Superior.

Item XI Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus is to be prorogued Propraetor
Lacus Magni.

Item XII Marcus Minucius Audens is to be prorogued Propraetor
Nova Britannia.

Item XIII Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia is to be prorogued
Propraetrix
Mercia Austrooccidentalis.


Item XIV This item serves as an option to the Senatores to write
in any existing Governor by name for proroguement who either:

i) did not respond for some justifiable or unavoidable reason to
the recent Consular Edictum expressly stating whether or not they
wished to be prorogued,

ii) responded late, but otherwise are qualified ( example: capite
censi aren't qualified)

This option is provided in acknowledgement of the power of the
Senate to prorogue Propraetores, as provided in the language of the
constitution. By utilizing this option, a Senator is stating in
principle that, he/she knows that this Gubernator wishes to
continue
in office, and that he/she is not personally interested in
entertaining future applications from the general populace for
other
candidates for Propraetor of a particular provincia.

A majority of Senate votes stating a desire that a particular
governor be prorogued via write-in shall be considered official
Senate sanction for him/her to be considered prorogued.


This Consular Edictum in question was published Feb. 1 2759 and its
language requested a response from Governors by Feb. 15, 2759. It
appeared in message 828 of the NovaRoma-Announce List
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NovaRoma-Announce It was also
concurrently published on the main forum in message 41585
Http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/. It was repeated on the
main forum in message #41683. This edictum was based on the
prevailing Senatus Consultum regarding Gubernatorial Prorogation:
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2001-03-11-iv.html
See also http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2000-06-02-i.html


Note: Those Gubernatores who did not submit their names as
requested above, and are not prorogued by successful write-in in
this Senate Session, may reapply for reinstatement at a later
provided time, and their names may be brought again before this
August Body for consideration of Propraetorship. Applications
shall
also be concurrently entertained from the populace at large with
respect to Gubernatorial vacancies. Announcement to this effect
shall be made by one or both Consuls. The following Gubernatores
are
currently in this situation:

Marcus Vitellius Legus: America Austroccidentalis
M. Flavius Conservatus: Germania
Decimus Gladius Lubus: Hibernia
Quintus Fabius Maximus: California
C. Argentinius Cicero: Argentina
Gaia Livia:Britannia



The following Propraetors have stated that they do not wish to be
prorogued:

Mediatlantica: Gn. Equitius Marinus
Canada Occidentalis: Quintus Seutonius Paulinus
Julilla Sempronia Magna: America Borreoccidentalis

On behalf of the Senate, the Consuls thank these two retiring
Propraetores very much for their hard work in service to Nova Roma.


Item XV: Marcus Iulius Severus shall be appointed Propraetor
Provincia Mexico

His resume as follows:



MARCVS IVLIVS SEVERVS PATRIBVS CONSCRIPTISQVE NOVAE ROMAE S•P•D.

I am respectfully addressing you by means of this message, to ask
you for your
recognition in order to be the next Propraetor of the Provincia
Mexico. I am an
assiduus citizen, and I've been working in several areas since I
joined Nova
Roma:

1. I have been working hard to organize the Provincia Mexico, that
was paralyzed
until I started this effort, with the enthusiastic help of some
other cives and
the invaluable support and advice of the Propraetor Hispaniae, M.
Curiatius
Complutensis.
2. We have been having meetings every month in Mexico City, and
started
organizing the III Vexillatio of Legio VI Ferrata, as well as an
official web
page.
3. I created a new mail list for the Provincia Mexico, at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nrprovinciamexico/. It has been
working
successfully.
4. I helped M. Curiatius Complutensis in the works for the Census
of
Nova Roma
in the Provincia Mexico, working as his auxiliary.
5. I am also a Scriba and Spanish interpreter in the Cohors
Censoris
of Censor
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus.
6. I was elected Musaeus of the Collegium Eratous, in the Sodalitas
Musarum, and
am also Socius of the Chorus Musarum.
7. In last December, I was elected Rogator of Nova Roma.

Clarissimi Senatores, all the active cives in the Provincia Mexico,
support my
appointment as Propraetor.
If I am appointed Propraetor of the Provincia Mexico, I will work
with the
biggest enthusiasm and dedication to reach the following goals:

1) To strengthen the ties of the Provincia with Nova Roma,
promoting
the
involvement of our citizens in the social and political life of the
Res Publica.
2) To celebrate agreements with the main Mexican universities, to
promote
activities related to ancient Rome and to Nova Roma.
3) To constitute the Province as a civil non-lucrative society,
withits own
juridical personality according to the legal Mexican frame.
4) To support, as it has been done, the creation of the III Vexilla
of Legio VI
Ferrata, and promote events of military re-enactment in the
Province.
5) The creation and development of new local groups (Oppida and
Municipia) in
the Provincia.
6) The organization of more meetings between the citizens of the
Provincia
Mexico, including a full provincial meeting each year; increasing
the cultural
and recruitment activities, and the participation in international
Nova Roman
events.
7) To accelerate the creation of the provincial web site and to
make
use of it,
to link more the Province with the rest of the Res Publica.

Clarissimi Senatores, I ask your support for my appointment as the
new
Propraetor of the Provincia Mexico, in order to begin my mandate as
soon as
possible.

Valete bene in pace deorum,

M•IVL•SEVERVS
****

Item XVI: Gn. Iulius Caesar shall be appointed Propraetor
Provincia
Canada Occidentalis
His resume as follows:

Cn. Iulius Caesar Consulibus S.P.D.

I wish to be considered for the position of Propraetor of Canada
Occidentalis, given the fact that Quintus Suetonius Paulinus has
declared his intention to step down. I have as you will note also
copied Suetonius Paulinus on this.

My declaration of candidacy for Quaestor contains much information
that is relevant to the skill set necessary for a propraetor, and I
reproduce it here:

"I am 44 years old and I have held the office of Scriba
Propraetoris
and am currently a Legate of my province. I am also Praefectus
Retarius in the Sodalitas Militarium and Praefectus Retarius in
Sodalitas Egressus. Additionally I was appointed to the role of
Praefectus for the Outreach Program of Sodalitas Egressus and
Dominus Praefectus of the GO ROMAN project. I also have served this
year as Accensus to the Consul Gaius Popillius Laenas. I have also
been involved in the drafting of laws and am also paterfamilias of
a
fairly sizeable family in Nova Roma.

I served 11 years as a police officer and am currently a manager
within a Justice Department. As well as being a "front line" police
officer I was also responsible for preparing the report for a new
policing area, station, manpower and equipment, which involved
months of research required by central government. This required
budgetary analysis and fiscal projection.

Within my current role I am responsible for managing a specific
budget of over $1 million, and also am involved in the planning
process for another budget of well over $10 million. Procurement,
financial analysis, projection, fraud control and asset management
also fall under my purview, as well as the responsibility of
meeting
a specific financial recovery target of over $2.5 million.

I work frequently with the offices of the Ombudsman and the Auditor
General. I am also involved in the drafting of statutes and
regulations, as well as the creation of business plans, policies
and
procedures. I also am responsible for critical incident recovery
policy management and serve on an appeals tribunal in job re-
classification labour disputes. I have an educational background in
computer language design and am actively involved in the running of
two family businesses."

I am currently serving as Quaestor to the Curule Aedile, C.
Equitius
Cato.

If appointed it would be my intention to pursue the hard efforts of
Suetonius Paulinus to increase the provincial citizen roll, and to
that end would actively promote the GO ROMAN project in my
province,
as Paulinus has committed to do so. In addition I would seek to
strengthen links with the local reenactment Legion, and other local
classical groups. I have managed people to one degree or another
for
24 years. Numerically I have at times been responsible for the
direct administration of approximately 150 staff and the minimum
has
been 6. Over the last 5 years the average has been about 30. I also
have frequent responsibility for the control of additional staff in
order to implement and execute projects. I have taken numerous
supervisory and management courses both within the police and in
the
government. I am also repsonsible for the recruitment and training
of new staff and remedial training for existing staff, and was a
divisional trainer for my police force.
Salvete
Cn. Iulius Caesar

************

The prevailing Senatus Consultum for minimum qualifications for
Propraetores is here:
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2000-06-02-i.html


The following provinciae have no Propraetores at present:

Asia Occidentalis
Asia Orientalis
Sarmatia
Venedia

Propraetorships theoretically terminate on the Kalends March for
those Propraetores who are not prorogued, and new Propraetores
shall then begin their terms. As the omens, etc. are such that
voting on this shall extend past the Kalends of March, the new
Gubernatores shall take office upon establishment of the results of
this Senate vote.

Respectfully,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus

Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42437 From: André Cidade Date: 2006-03-04
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Salvete omnes.

I have my reasons to believe, and perhaps they are the same as Cato's,
perhaps not, that this a lost debate. No discussion is useless, but I feel
that may turn out to be something less than a debate. Unfortunetely I'm a
bit too proud and stubborn and love endless, "pointless" debates and
am volunteering to join this one too, if I may.

To begin with, a book entitled "Jesus was Caesar" that attempts to prove the
fact that "Jesus proves to be Divus Iulius, the deified Caesar, passed down
in tradition" is trying to prove a theory. His "objective facts" still have
to be laid down to provide a coherent explanation and thus prove his theory,
idea, new substancial revelation or whatever we would like to call it. He
still has to prove it, and it is still debatable.

Second (but I admit I will not use this argument often, it's kind of too
much to use this one here) there is no such thing as a "undisputed objective
fact". Everything is open to discussion, argument, everything is debatable,
including these statements of mine, of course. Let's not make too much out
of it though, otherwise it would make it impossible to have any debate.

Lastly, for now, I have something to say about the substance of the essay.
It is, I guess, demonstrable that there are similarities between both
stories and the paths of both characthers. It is also very possible and
understandable that the strong image and ideas regarding Julius Caesar would
influence later notions, ideas and images of prophets, and I guess it did.
But that is all. The paths, objectives, ideas, powers, weaknesses, ultimate
goals and the essence of Jesus and Caesar are different and irreconcilable.
It is possible that what the romans saw in Caesar was very similar to what
catholics feel about Jesus (though I think not). Caesar indeed has many
traces of a prophet (and indeed do other people throughout history, such as
Marx) but the essence and substance of true prophets (not in the sense that
they ARE divine, but in the sense that they fulfill the "requirements" of a
prophet) are different from those of Caesar and Marx. The connection
intended by the book remains to be proven and demonstrated thoroughly. What
Mr. Carotta does (and does very well, I should say) is to show similarities
and parallels between the stories and symbols surrounding both men. That is
very good and allows us to see even clearer how very different "things" in
substance may have a very similar experience and be lived and felt in a very
similar way. That doesn't make Jesus and Caesar one and the same substance,
essence and being. Such parallels can be shown between any two different
prophets or historical person who has happened to achieve a divine, or near
divine status. Many similarities, stunning even, can be drawn between Caesar
and Marx, Jesus and Che Guevara, Zaratustra and Richard the Lion Hearted.
Perhaps because of the chronological and cultural proximity of the events,
such similarities between Jesus and Caesar may be impressive, but that is
hardly conclusive.

Sorry for the loooooong text and for the mistakes made, this is not my
native language and I still find it difficult to translate my ideas. Thank
you for your patience,

Publius Arminius Celsus.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42438 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-04
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
M. Hortensia omnibus spd;
all right I've read the site & frankly you'd make a better
argument using Teixidor's "The Pagan God" and equating Jesus with
any number of youthful gods, Adonis, Melqart, Orpheus etc....
I mean if you are keen to worship Divus Julius, go right ahead,
but otherwise just pick up a good solid history of Near Eastern
religion; it will tell you all you need to know to understand why
Christianity became popular. It's not the Gordion knot...
bene valet in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior


>
> Salve
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@>
wrote:
> >
> > I think it's best just to let this one go :-)
>
> You may, but I won't. It's an abyss, 2000 years deep. Once you
dare to look it won't let you
> go.
>
> Vale
>
> C. Asinius Pollio
>
>
> http://www.carotta.de/subseite/texte/jwc_e/contents.html
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42439 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2006-03-04
Subject: Volunteers Needed
Q. Caecilius Metellus Omnibus sal.

I am in need of volunteers. The project is the composition of the
Annales Maximi, as best we can reconstruct them, from the beginning of
Nova Roma. What I need are people who are willing to help go through
the archives of the Main List, the previous Main List, and the Religio
Romana list, to find all the rituals that have been performed, by whom,
and when. The timeline for project completion is yet to be determined,
depending largely on the number of volunteers received, though the aim
is sometime before 13 August.

If anyone is willing to help with this project and has the time to do
so, please write me at sapientissimi 'at' gmail 'dot' com. Any and all
help will be not only welcome but appreciated.

Valete Bene,

Q. Caecilius Metellus
Pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42440 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: CUBA LIBRE (off topic)
Salve Marcus Cassius,

> It could be much worse amice. You could have been drinking Tequila - now that is just vile stuff.
> I'm surprised the suicide rate isn't higher in Mexico, I felt like <doing myself in the morning
> after a "Sunrise" Party back in college, the hang over from Tequila is probably the worst in the
> world. 32 years later I can still taste in <my mouth the effects of it. I've never drunk it since.
> Tequila can probably be used to remove or thin paint out if Turpentine isn't available :)

I don't drink at all anymore but I used to own a cocktail bar at a hotel swimming pool in Tenerife.
I served 55 cocktails about half being my own creation. I'm very handy at parties!

I used to be a big fan of Malibu Rum (mixed with pineapple it makes a great low-fat piña colada),
but I haven't drank any rum ever since 1995, when I spent a entire day sitting at the pool drinking
Tenerife's local Honey Rum. It goes down very smoothe and comes up with a vengeance. I had to be
carried home, which luckily for my carriers, was only to the first floor of the hotel. Now I've gone
and given myself flashbacks...

Vale,
Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42441 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: a.d. III Non. Mar.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem III Nones Martias; haec dies comitialis est.

"When Aurora, Tithonus' bride, shall have begun
To shed dew from her saffron cheeks at the fifth dawn,
The constellation, whether you call it Arctophylax,
Or dull Bootes, will have been sinking, fleeing your sight.
But even the Grape-Gatherer will not yet have escaped you:
The origin of that star-name also can be swiftly told.
It's said that hairy Ampelus, son of a nymph and satyr,
Was loved by Bacchus, among the Ismarian hills:
The god entrusted him with a vine, trailing from an elm's
Leafy boughs, and the vine takes its name from the boy's.
While on a branch rashly picking the shining grapes.
He fell: but Liber raised the fallen youth to the stars." - Ovid,
Fasti III

"In the center [of the Shield of Herakles] was Phobos, worked in
adamant, unspeakable, staring backwards with eyes that glowed with
fire. His mouth was full of teeth in a white row, fearful and
daunting, and upon his grim brow hovered frightful Eris who arrays the
throng of men ... Upon the shield Proioxis and Palioxis were wrought,
and Homados, and Phobos, and Androktasie. Eris also, and Kydoimos were
hurrying about, and deadly Fate." - Shield of Heracles 139f

This month is dedicated to Mars, the god of War. Mars was a much more
personable deity than his Greek counterpart, Ares. Ares was pure
slaughter, unbridled ferocity in battle; Phobos was the
personification of fear and horror. He was the son of Ares and
Aphrodite. He, his brother Deimos, and the goddess Enyo accompanied
Ares into battle, along with his father's attendants, Trembling and
Panic. His Roman equivalent was Timor. Deimos was the personification
of dread. His Roman equivalent was Formido or Metus. Enyo was an
ancient goddess known by the epithet "Waster of Cities" and frequently
depicted as being covered in blood and carrying weapons of war. She
was frequently portrayed as a companion of Ares, the chief god of war,
and has been variously said to be his mother or sister. She was
occasionally said to be one of the Graeae.

Enyo's Roman counterpart, Bellona, like Ares's counterpart Mars, was
much more popular. She is believed to be one of the numinous gods of
the Romans (without a particular mythology and possibly of Etruscan
origin), and is supposed by many to have been the Romans' original war
deity, predating the identification of Mars with Ares. Her name,
Bellona, is derived from the Latin word for "war" (bellum), and is
directly related to the modern English word "belligerent" (lit.,
"war-bearing"). In art, she is portrayed with a helmet, sword, spear,
and torch.

Politically, all Senate meetings relating to foreign war were
conducted in the Templum Bellonae (Temple of Bellona) on the Collis
Capitolinus outside the pomerium. This temple was built in 296 B.C.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Homer, Ovid, Wikipedia ("Ares", "Phobos", Deimos", "Enyo")
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42442 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: FYI David Meadow's Explorator 8.45 March 5, 2006
Salve Romans

FYI

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


================================================================
explorator 8.45 March 5, 2006
================================================================
Editor's note: Most urls should be active for at least eight
hours from the time of publication.

For your computer's protection, Explorator is sent in plain text
and NEVER has attachments. Be suspicious of any Explorator which
arrives otherwise!!!
================================================================
SNIP
================================================================
ANCIENT GREECE AND ROME (AND CLASSICS)
================================================================
Interesting study in the works on the 'true value' of Roman
coins:

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-03/uol-ate030306.php<http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-03/uol-ate030306.php>
http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20060303-065440-4795r<http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20060303-065440-4795r>
http://www.physorg.com/news11419.html<http://www.physorg.com/news11419.html>

A Phoenician temple from Sicily:

http://tinyurl.com/qbrtj<http://tinyurl.com/qbrtj> (ANSA)

A colony of Argillos on Andros:

http://tinyurl.com/pba4u<http://tinyurl.com/pba4u> (Kathimerini)

Is there a Roman palace under some war time bunkers in York?:

http://tinyurl.com/kacnf<http://tinyurl.com/kacnf> (YP)

A pile of ancient theatres are being excavated in Anatolia:

http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=37208<http://wwwturkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=37208>

Tom Palaima takes on the spending on athletic programs:

http://tinyurl.com/ld8zk<http://tinyurl.com/ld8zk> (Statesman)

Review of Mary Beard and John Henderson, *Classics: A Very Short
Introduction* (plus a book on Plato's Symposium):

http://books.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,,1721945,00.html<http://books.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,,1721945,00.html>

Recent reviews from BMCR:

http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/recent.html<http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/recent.html>

Recent reviews from Scholia:

http://www.classics.und.ac.za/reviews/2006.htm<http://www.classics.und.acza/reviews/2006.htm>

Visit our blog:

http://www.atrium-media.com/rogueclassicism<http://www.atrium-media.com/rogueclassicism>
================================================================





================================================================
NUMISMATICA
================================================================
Analysis of Roman Silver Coins: Augustus to Nero:

http://tinyurl.com/rr5lw<http://tinyurl.com/rr5lw> (AHDS)




================================================================
Explorator is Copyright (c) 2006 David Meadows. Feel free to
distribute these listings via email to your pals, students,
teachers, etc., but please include this copyright notice. These
links are not to be posted to any website by any means (whether
by direct posting or snagging from a usenet group or some other
email source) without my express written permission. I think it
is only right that I be made aware of public fora which are
making use of content gathered in Explorator. Thanks!
================================================================





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42443 From: Gaius Asinius Pollio Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Vale

> M. Hortensia omnibus spd;
> all right I've read the site & frankly you'd make a better
> argument using Teixidor's "The Pagan God" and equating Jesus with
> any number of youthful gods, Adonis, Melqart, Orpheus etc....

It's often strange how fast people can apparently read, especially a book that would
usually take at least several days to go through, let alone to understand. But your reaction
and your remark is very understandable: as a "mystery-lover" you belong - in the context
of the Jesus-Caesar discovery - to the category of the (esoterical) obscurantists: you
expect Jesus not only to be a myth himself but to be a patchwork of ancient East European
and Near Eastern myths. This is pathetic! (Ever hear of Occam's razor?) This is even worse
than what's coming from standard atheists, because you rely on nothing at all to explain
whatever religious phenomenon you can get your hands on. Sure, when all is a myth, there
is no Gordian knot, but there is also only just hot air: a state of maximum spiritual
entropy, a religious dead zone the world has been buried in for thousands of years. This is
really how you like it? I'm devastated how people can treat things in such disrespect,
including themselves.

On the contrary to what you write, one would have to connect ancient myths and Gods not
to Jesus, but one would first need to show them in the divine Caesar (and the Divi filius) or
at least in their theopolitics, otherwise these myths and ancient beliefs could never have
ended up in the Jesus-legend. But to quote the author, I'm not here to fight windmills,
because you don't seem to be keen on debating this matter thoroughly and sincerely
anyway. So I urge you to not answer to this topic any longer, because it's apparently not
your cup of tea.

> I mean if you are keen to worship Divus Julius, go right ahead,

It's not about religion, it's about the HISTORY and ARCHAEOLOGY of religion. But to
answer your remark: as a Christian I don't need to decide on worshipping the Divus Iulius.
In Christianity we have something called baptism, and therefore I am already worshipping
him, and always have, like every other Christian too. Jesus - this we know now - was never
a myth, only a mystery, but that mystery has been solved, which means that as a
"mystery-lover" you have to find yourself another one.

Regards
Asinius Pollio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42444 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: Do ex-Boni drink wine from lead cups?
A. Apollonius T. Octavio omnibusque sal.

Let's start from the basics.

Modern, western political parties are a feature of
representative democracies. Representative democracies
have legislative bodies made of elected
representatives of the people. The primary purpose of
political parties in such systems is to control the
legislature by putting up candidates to be elected as
representatives. Each party therefore seeks to
maximise the number of its members in the legislature.
This to a great extent dictates the way modern
political parties work. Your definition of "political
party" reflects this type of system.

A Roman republic has no such representative
legislature, so a Roman political party will never
have the same features as a political party of that
kind. Now if you want you can refuse to acknowledge
that the term "political party" can ever be applied to
any group other than a group of the kind I mentioned
above. In that case, there will never be any such
thing as a political party in our republic. But I
think this would be an unduly narrow definition of the
term.

To me, a political party can be defined as an
association which exists to achieve political
objectives or to promote a political agenda. To add
extra requirements like "it must have a definite
leadership structure" and so on is, to my mind,
excessive. When you start doing that you are not
stating a definition any longer, you are simply
describing some common features which many political
parties have. A definition consists only of those
features which are the absolute minimum.

The only reason why you and others regard "party" as
in some way pejorative is because you assume it means
a group like the parties we find in representative
democracies. To me there is nothing pejorative about
the term at all. It is simply an association with a
political agenda. There's nothing wrong with that. It
directly translates one meaning of the Latin "pars",
which was not a pejorative term (unlike "factio").
That's the sense in which I use the term. So when I
say "the Libra party" I am not conveying any insult or
disparagement: I am simply giving what I consider an
accurate description. The fact that you are irritated
by my use of the term is merely a feature of your
excessively narrow understanding of the term.

You may prefer to say "alliance". For a couple of
reasons I prefer not to use this. Firstly it doesn't
easily correspond to any Latin term. "Societas" could
be used, I suppose, but this has a somewhat different
connotation in Latin and is not generally used to
refer to political groups. Secondly, it seems to me to
disguise the similarity of the Libra party to the
other parties which exist and have existed. I imagine
this was a deliberate piece of PR by the founders of
the group: by styling it as an "alliance" they perhaps
sought to convey the idea that it was a looser, less
sinister group than the 'Boni' or the 'Moderati'. But
in reality it is no looser or less organized than
those two groups, and functions in much the same way.

All these groups consist, or consisted, of people who
agree on a common core of ideas and have a certain
degree of mutual respect, or at least tolerance. They
prefer to keep their major disagreements private, but
sometimes they disagree publicly; when they disagree
publicly they prefer to do so in fairly amicable
terms. A member who profoundly disapproves of the
conduct of a significant number of other members may
feel the need to leave the group (we can think of
examples among the 'Boni' and the Libripentes). At
election-time they often express a broad collective
preference for certain candidates as opposed to
certain others.

Given the very significant similarities between the
various groups, I feel it is rather misleading to use
different terms for them. No doubt it suits the
Libripentes to call themselves by the benign term
"alliance" and to allow other groups to be known as
"factions", but I am not interested in playing along
with such exercises in public relations and
product-branding. To me, they are all roughly similar
in character and I call them all by the same name. The
name I choose is neither the pejorative "faction" nor
the unduly vague "alliance" but the neutral and
accurate "party", translating the Latin "pars".

I don't think you do your fellow Libripentes any
favours by so insistently denying that the Libra
alliance is a party. It surely cannot be good
publicity for a group if one of its members is
continually complaining about what people call the
group. It suggests an excessive sensitivity which may
prompt people to wonder why you are so very bothered
by being called a party. Would it not be simpler,
rather than spending a lot of time denying that you
are a party, to admit that you are a party but to make
it clear to newcomers than parties in Nova Roma are
not like modern political parties?

If you choose to explain things in this way, you will
have no argument from me. The reason we are having
this argument is not because I am misleading people
about the nature of your group but because I am
calling it by a name you don't like. In fact my
message which prompted your irritation was entirely
dedicated to explaining how unlike modern political
parties both the 'Boni' and the Libra party are. No
one who actually read what I wrote could possibly have
been misled into thinking that the Libra alliance was
like a modern political party.

So if you have any actual objection to the way I
describe and portray the Libra party, please correct
me. If you have talked to people who have been misled
by my use of the word "party" into thinking that your
group has a three-line whip, a hierarchical structure,
and a formally-designated leader, then produce these
people and I shall be entirely happy to explain that
it has no such things. But if all you want to do is
quibble with my use of the English language, then I
don't see that the conversation serves much purpose.

Now, it also happens that I consider the practice of
creating and sustaining formally-constituted parties
like the 'Boni' and the Libra party to be un-Roman,
pernicious, and contra rem publicam. That does not
make "party" itself a pejorative term, it just means
that I object to parties of the particular kind which
yours represents. No doubt you think that the
existence of such groups - or at least of one such
group - is good for the republic. Fair enough. We
disagree. Presumably you do not deny me the right to
say that I think they are a bad thing, just as I
support your right to say that they are a good thing.
I do not think all parties are bad, only those which
have a level of formality and internal organization
such as yours has. Admittedly by modern standards it
is a relatively low level of formality and internal
organization, but it is still, in my view, too high to
be tolerable in a Roman republic. These are things
about which we may amicably and even usefully disagree
and argue. But they have nothing to do with whether we
call such groups "parties", "factions", "alliances",
or anything else.

Finally:

> > In any case, I don't much care what you call it in
> > English. What matters is that it is, like the
> 'Boni'
> > and other such groups, something the Romans never
> had,
> > would never have had, and would probably have
> regarded
> > as a conjuratio contra rem publicam.
>
> This is a rather grave accusation. If this is
> something you believe to
> have any basis in reality, I ask you as Praetor of
> Nova Roma to please
> submit the matter to me and my colleague for
> consideration. If not, then
> never make accusations of this nature again, or I
> will file charges for
> slander.

First, I think you have misunderstood the nature of
your office. The praetores do not investigate breaches
of the law, they merely preside over the judicial
system. If I thought that a criminal offence had been
committed it would not be appropriate for me to
"submit the matter" to you and your colleague "for
consideration". The correct course of action would be
for me to gather the evidence and then file a
prosecution.

Secondly, I have no reason to suspect that a criminal
offence has been committed. I said, and I say again,
that the ancient Romans would never have had such
groups as the 'Boni' and the Libra Alliance, and would
probably have regarded them as conjurationes contra
rem publicam. It is not a criminal offence in Nova
Roma to do something which the ancient Romans would
never have done. Nor is it even a criminal offence in
Nova Roma to do something which the ancient Romans
would have regarded as a contra rem publicam.

Of course I concede that my remarks could well damage
the reputation of those who belong to such groups, and
if you want to sue me for slander there is probably
enough material in this message and in various things
I have said previously to form the basis of a case.
But you will have to prove not only that my statement
was harmful to your reputation but also that it was
not true. Which it is.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42445 From: robertpartlow Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Salvete Omnis,

It is puzzling that the name "Gaius Asinius Polio" cannot be found in
the Album Gentium. It is also curious that he is personally attacking
someone over an itellectual discussion of a subject that does need
attention. The fact that he needs such a religious
fundamentalist "JINGOIST(from the term JINGO)" stance from which to
attck from (and as is very evident, needs in order to feel like a
person) reinforces the conclusion that such attitude is merely
a "crutch" of personal support (lending to the name "Polio" as used
in the commonly understood sense). This world can no longer survive
such religious-fundementalist attitude holding power any longer. "IT"
should be reduced to the "LUNATIC-FRINGE" status it once held during
decent constructive times. In other words, children should not be
given the right to perform as adults and lunatics should only be
tolerated with pity and both should be helped to
emotional/intellectual equalibrium without threatening the safety of
society and for that matter the safety of the world.

Valvete,

A. Claudius Scipio

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Asinius Pollio"
<smaitee@...> wrote:
>
> Vale
>
> > M. Hortensia omnibus spd;
> > all right I've read the site & frankly you'd make a better
> > argument using Teixidor's "The Pagan God" and equating Jesus with
> > any number of youthful gods, Adonis, Melqart, Orpheus etc....
>
> It's often strange how fast people can apparently read, especially
a book that would
> usually take at least several days to go through, let alone to
understand. But your reaction
> and your remark is very understandable: as a "mystery-lover" you
belong - in the context
> of the Jesus-Caesar discovery - to the category of the (esoterical)
obscurantists: you
> expect Jesus not only to be a myth himself but to be a patchwork of
ancient East European
> and Near Eastern myths. This is pathetic! (Ever hear of Occam's
razor?) This is even worse
> than what's coming from standard atheists, because you rely on
nothing at all to explain
> whatever religious phenomenon you can get your hands on. Sure, when
all is a myth, there
> is no Gordian knot, but there is also only just hot air: a state of
maximum spiritual
> entropy, a religious dead zone the world has been buried in for
thousands of years. This is
> really how you like it? I'm devastated how people can treat things
in such disrespect,
> including themselves.
>
> On the contrary to what you write, one would have to connect
ancient myths and Gods not
> to Jesus, but one would first need to show them in the divine
Caesar (and the Divi filius) or
> at least in their theopolitics, otherwise these myths and ancient
beliefs could never have
> ended up in the Jesus-legend. But to quote the author, I'm not here
to fight windmills,
> because you don't seem to be keen on debating this matter
thoroughly and sincerely
> anyway. So I urge you to not answer to this topic any longer,
because it's apparently not
> your cup of tea.
>
> > I mean if you are keen to worship Divus Julius, go right
ahead,
>
> It's not about religion, it's about the HISTORY and ARCHAEOLOGY of
religion. But to
> answer your remark: as a Christian I don't need to decide on
worshipping the Divus Iulius.
> In Christianity we have something called baptism, and therefore I
am already worshipping
> him, and always have, like every other Christian too. Jesus - this
we know now - was never
> a myth, only a mystery, but that mystery has been solved, which
means that as a
> "mystery-lover" you have to find yourself another one.
>
> Regards
> Asinius Pollio
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42446 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Gaius Asinius Pollio wrote:

> (Ever hear of Occam's razor?)

"Occam's Razor" is a rule to be applied in the absence of decisive
evidence. (For the few who never heard of it, William of Occam's rule in
such cases was that entities were not to be multiplied unnecessarily, but
this is usually reduced to a simpler form: Of several explanations, the
simplest is most likely to be right.)

In the case of religious arguments, what usually happens, and what seems
to be happening in this case, is that there is ever so much evidence, but
some of the parties reject or reinterpret parts that other parties rely on
to support their cases. Is the identification of Julius Caesar with Jesus
invalid because Julius predated Jesus by several decades? Is it invalid
because about the age Jesus was when he was executed Julius was
complaining that he had done nothing worth remembering though by his time
of life Alexander the Great had conquered the known world? Is Julius'
deification invalid because we don't recognize decisions of the ancient
Roman Senate? Is Jesus' record untrustworthy because it wasn't in
existence in a permanent form until half a century after his death? Are
the obnoxious deeds of the various Christian Churches, or of prominent
individual Christians, evidence that their putative founder wasn't divine
or he would never have permitted such things to be done in his name?

Occam's Razor isn't much help with questions like that.

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42447 From: robertpartlow Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
Salvete Omnis,

I have faith in the forces of Canada and the UK because of their
attitudes at home and because of their willingness to cooperate with
the UN. I trust they will continue to be a positive and constructive
force where ever they are assigned. I only hope that the U.S. forces
will learn from their example and disregard directives resulting from
the destructive jingoism and knee-jerk patriotism behind what they
may recieve from the current U.S. administration. All Hail the
Peacekeepers and those who quell the destructive fundamentalists such
as the Taliban, Baathists and American Neo-Cons!

Valvete,
A. Claudius Scipio

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> ---
>
> Salve Veni et Salvete Omnes:
>
> As a Canukian I thank you very much...our boys and girls have been
> at this in 'Stan' since 2001. Operation Apollo, Operation Athena,
> etc. That's us. We tend to lean to the Greek with our Military
> mission nomenclature, ...but we fight like Romans when we have to.
>
> It's like Taliban... like....take off, ok?
> (The MacKenzie Brothers)
> Canukians 'keep their stick on the ice'
> (Red Green)
>
> Hey, this is not just military, this is 'culture' up here!
>
> Pompeia :)
> (Proud to be the first Roman Canadian Consul of Nova Roma)
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus"
> <wend1066@> wrote:
> >
> > veletudo omnes;
> >
> > On 3/2/06, QFabiusMaxmi@ <QFabiusMaxmi@> wrote:
> > > I wanted to show this to the Canadians on the list, to show
your
> current
> > > involvement in
> > > the "War against Terror" You have our thanks.
> > >
> > > Q. Fabius Maximus
> > >
> > > In a message dated 2/28/2006 2:55:38 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> > > moderncrossfire@yahoogroups.com writes:
> > >
> > > KANDAHAR, Afghanistan - They call them "sura espiyan," Pashtun
> for "red
> > > dogs," and the LAV III armoured vehicles are "bala,"
> or "monsters."
> > >
> > > [respectful excision]
> > >
> >
> > In deed, thank you to our friends and allies of Canada!!!
> >
> > Sertorius, may That Which Is Holy watch over
> > and keep you and your comrades safe when you are in harm's way.
> >
> > =========================================
> > In amicitia quod fides -
> > Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> >
> > Veteran: PFC Vermont Army National Guard - SSgt USAF Reserve
> > Whose great grandmother Robinson's maiden name was Allard,
> > being a woman of Acadian-Miqmaq and Mohawk parentage.
> >
> > http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> > http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> > http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
> > --
> > May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> > May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> > May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42448 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Status of G. Asinius Pollio
Salvete quirites,

There was a question about G. Asinius Pollio. He is a provisional citizen who
joined Nova Roma on Jan 8th of this year. I hope that clears up any questions
about his status.

Valete,

-- CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42449 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
Hello A. Claudius Scipio

Thank you for turning something, which was simply a recognition and
appreciation of the brave men and women of the Canadian Forces, into a
political issue.

- Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42450 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
---Salve Claudius Scipio:

The only darned problem is, we cannot blame the U.S. Forces per
se....they can't go on strike because they don't agree with their
president's agenda. Not without any meaningful outcome all
around....doesn't matter how many of them morphed into Hanoi Jane.
Approximately 50% of Americans do not agree with the conflict in
Iraq...If it were left up to these 50% or so, we wouldn't be having
this discussion.

Anyway, I, personally don't want to pursue this thread any further,
as it encroaches on a sensitive issue which NR can't do very much
about, and alot of the folks being spoken of in this are also NR
citizens. But I felt I needed to say something...In all virtue,I
think we have to be careful to separate those suffering the
consequences of the conflict, including a portion of the U.S.
forces, from those 'big cheezes' who decided to initiate the
conflict, when we assign responsibility or blame .

Fides
Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "robertpartlow" <robertpartlow@...>
wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnis,
>
> I have faith in the forces of Canada and the UK because of their
> attitudes at home and because of their willingness to cooperate
with
> the UN. I trust they will continue to be a positive and
constructive
> force where ever they are assigned. I only hope that the U.S.
forces
> will learn from their example and disregard directives resulting
from
> the destructive jingoism and knee-jerk patriotism behind what they
> may recieve from the current U.S. administration. All Hail the
> Peacekeepers and those who quell the destructive fundamentalists
such
> as the Taliban, Baathists and American Neo-Cons!
>
> Valvete,
> A. Claudius Scipio
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
> <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@> wrote:
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Salve Veni et Salvete Omnes:
> >
> > As a Canukian I thank you very much...our boys and girls have
been
> > at this in 'Stan' since 2001. Operation Apollo, Operation
Athena,
> > etc. That's us. We tend to lean to the Greek with our Military
> > mission nomenclature, ...but we fight like Romans when we have
to.
> >
> > It's like Taliban... like....take off, ok?
> > (The MacKenzie Brothers)
> > Canukians 'keep their stick on the ice'
> > (Red Green)
> >
> > Hey, this is not just military, this is 'culture' up here!
> >
> > Pompeia :)
> > (Proud to be the first Roman Canadian Consul of Nova Roma)
> >
> > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus"
> > <wend1066@> wrote:
> > >
> > > veletudo omnes;
> > >
> > > On 3/2/06, QFabiusMaxmi@ <QFabiusMaxmi@> wrote:
> > > > I wanted to show this to the Canadians on the list, to show
> your
> > current
> > > > involvement in
> > > > the "War against Terror" You have our thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Q. Fabius Maximus
> > > >
> > > > In a message dated 2/28/2006 2:55:38 P.M. Pacific Standard
Time,
> > > > moderncrossfire@yahoogroups.com writes:
> > > >
> > > > KANDAHAR, Afghanistan - They call them "sura espiyan,"
Pashtun
> > for "red
> > > > dogs," and the LAV III armoured vehicles are "bala,"
> > or "monsters."
> > > >
> > > > [respectful excision]
> > > >
> > >
> > > In deed, thank you to our friends and allies of Canada!!!
> > >
> > > Sertorius, may That Which Is Holy watch over
> > > and keep you and your comrades safe when you are in harm's way.
> > >
> > > =========================================
> > > In amicitia quod fides -
> > > Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> > >
> > > Veteran: PFC Vermont Army National Guard - SSgt USAF Reserve
> > > Whose great grandmother Robinson's maiden name was Allard,
> > > being a woman of Acadian-Miqmaq and Mohawk parentage.
> > >
> > > http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> > > http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> > > http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
> > > --
> > > May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> > > May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> > > May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42451 From: Gaius Asinius Pollio Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Salvete

Oh, come on, I'm not personally attacking anyone. I was just reacting to the second
nonsensitive if not impudent post by Marca Hortensia Maior in a row, almost ridiculing
something that is very important (at least to me). Maybe you should read her post again.
But I guess it's easier to bash the putative religious fundamentalist idiot. All I'm trying to
do is question old-established theories about the historical Jesus, that's all. (The Jesus-
myth theory is part of that!) I have every reason to - after reading Carotta's book. And you
know what: if this threatens the "safety of society"... well, sorry to disappoint you, it's
exactly what I'll continue to do.

As for my status at Nova Roma, I just applied a few weeks ago. (Actually thought it was for
the discussion group...)

As for Livius' post, I mentioned Occam's Razor in reply to an argument about the history of
Christianity, of its origin, not an argument about the religion as a whole. You just don't
question religion, you don't question the beliefs of people. But to propagate that the
Gospels were fabricated as a patchwork from ancient myths and gods is a theory that will
be quickly shaven off by the razor (apart from being not to the purpose.) But you are right:
for all the question that you raised, the razor wouldn't apply, because it's about parsimony
of a theory, not the accuracy of its parts or loosely associated questions.

Valete
C. Asinius Pollio

http://www.carotta.de/subseite/texte/jwc_e/contents.html


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "robertpartlow" <robertpartlow@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnis,
>
> It is puzzling that the name "Gaius Asinius Polio" cannot be found in
> the Album Gentium. It is also curious that he is personally attacking
> someone over an itellectual discussion of a subject that does need
> attention. The fact that he needs such a religious
> fundamentalist "JINGOIST(from the term JINGO)" stance from which to
> attck from (and as is very evident, needs in order to feel like a
> person) reinforces the conclusion that such attitude is merely
> a "crutch" of personal support (lending to the name "Polio" as used
> in the commonly understood sense). This world can no longer survive
> such religious-fundementalist attitude holding power any longer. "IT"
> should be reduced to the "LUNATIC-FRINGE" status it once held during
> decent constructive times. In other words, children should not be
> given the right to perform as adults and lunatics should only be
> tolerated with pity and both should be helped to
> emotional/intellectual equalibrium without threatening the safety of
> society and for that matter the safety of the world.
>
> Valvete,
>
> A. Claudius Scipio
>

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, dicconf <dicconf@...> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Gaius Asinius Pollio wrote:
>
> > (Ever hear of Occam's razor?)
>
> "Occam's Razor" is a rule to be applied in the absence of decisive
> evidence. (For the few who never heard of it, William of Occam's rule in
> such cases was that entities were not to be multiplied unnecessarily, but
> this is usually reduced to a simpler form: Of several explanations, the
> simplest is most likely to be right.)
>
> In the case of religious arguments, what usually happens, and what seems
> to be happening in this case, is that there is ever so much evidence, but
> some of the parties reject or reinterpret parts that other parties rely on
> to support their cases. Is the identification of Julius Caesar with Jesus
> invalid because Julius predated Jesus by several decades? Is it invalid
> because about the age Jesus was when he was executed Julius was
> complaining that he had done nothing worth remembering though by his time
> of life Alexander the Great had conquered the known world? Is Julius'
> deification invalid because we don't recognize decisions of the ancient
> Roman Senate? Is Jesus' record untrustworthy because it wasn't in
> existence in a permanent form until half a century after his death? Are
> the obnoxious deeds of the various Christian Churches, or of prominent
> individual Christians, evidence that their putative founder wasn't divine
> or he would never have permitted such things to be done in his name?
>
> Occam's Razor isn't much help with questions like that.
>
> -- Publius Livius Triarius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42452 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
C. Equitius Cato Livio Triario Asinio Pollioni Hortensiae Maori
quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

I'm going to throw in an oar here because...well, that's what I do :-)

The themes represented by the Christian faith are fairly universal,
and so it would not surprise me to find evidence of them in the belief
systems of every society known to man since the dawn of time: guilt,
seperation, death, rebirth, reseurrection, &c. I do not need to
search through esoteric texts to find these, nor do I need to bury
myself in thick academic tomes; there is no special "gnosis" required
to understand that these themes are paramount in the history of the
spiritual existence and experience of mankind.

What Christianity claims is that the focal point of all these common
themes, the very quintessence of the universal yearning for
interaction with the Divine, can be found in the Person of Jesus
Christ. I made the point some time ago that every religion on earth
presents a way or path to "enlightenment" --- a book, a ritual or
series of rituals, a meditative process or processes --- except
Christianity. In Christianity we find the supreme presumption: Christ
points only to Himself as the very endpoint of the search for God.

This presumption can be considered arrogance or revelation. For
Christians, obviously, it is revelatory: God has chosen to make
Himdself known and immanent in that Person in a way that is completely
and utterly unparalelled in human experience. God does not just take
on the "form" of a man --- He becomes a man.

AARGH. More later. Work calls.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42453 From: Semiramis Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Greetings and Salutations... Newbie alert
Ave!

I'm Semmie17 and was invited here by Senator WCG. I teach Ancient,
Medieval and Classical literature at a small university in the great
plains region, and am female, 42 and single.

I'll lurk for a bit, but I've got lots of questions since I'm more
familiar with Greek and Roman literature than history.

Semmie
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42454 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: EDICTVM CENSORIVM
EDICTVM CENSORIVM DE SCRIBA CREANDO

Ex hoc, Gn. Cornelium Lentulum scribam creo. Nullum ius iurandum ab eo
postulabitur.

By this edict, I appoint Gn. Cornelius Lentulus as scriba. He will not be
required to swear any oath.

Datum sub manu mea ante diem III Non. MARTIAS MMDCCLIX

Given under my hand this 5th day of March, 2006 CE.

Cn. Equitius Marinus, Censor

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42455 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: Greetings and Salutations... Newbie alert
Salve Semmie, et salvete omnes,

Semiramis <semmie17@...> writes:

> I'm Semmie17 and was invited here by Senator WCG.

Known around here as Gn. Equitius Marinus. I hope you find the experience
worth your while. Please be welcome.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42456 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: Greetings and Salutations... Newbie alert
Salve!
Nova Roma is a wonderful place & I wish you a warm welcome. There is
a lot going on evidenced not just by this list. There is the Sodalitas
Latinitas, where many post in Latin, a coin group that is about to
mint a new NR sestercius, a sodality devoted to the arts, the religio
romana group, a group to start "Vox Romana" a podcast about NR and all
things Roman, ancient cooking...it goes on & on!
bene vale
Marca Hortensia Maior, aedilis plebis
producer "Vox Romana" podcast

> I'm Semmie17 and was invited here by Senator WCG. I teach Ancient,
> Medieval and Classical literature at a small university in the great
> plains region, and am female, 42 and single.
>
> I'll lurk for a bit, but I've got lots of questions since I'm more
> familiar with Greek and Roman literature than history.
>
> Semmie
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42457 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, gaiusequitiuscato wrote:

> I made the point some time ago that every religion on earth
> presents a way or path to "enlightenment" --- a book, a ritual or
> series of rituals, a meditative process or processes --- except
> Christianity. In Christianity we find the supreme presumption: Christ
> points only to Himself as the very endpoint of the search for God.

But this brushes aside the long history of Christian mysticism, which
_does_ seek such a path to enlightenment -- often on the grounds that the
nature of God/Christ/Paraclete is so transcendent as not to admit of
intellectual understanding, and that the records of the Bible do not
provide sufficient data to allow effective reasoning.

People who follow this path are often condemned (and sometimes used to be
burned) by the official Church. A point in their favor, I would say.

-- Plblius Livios Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42458 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor Petitio Actionis
Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor

For the remainder of the year all Petitio Actionis filed with the
Praetors office MUST be sent to

NR_Cohors_Praetoria@yahoogroups.com

If you would like to CC a copy to the emails of the Praetors that is
fine and they are

Praetor Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus
from@...

Praetor Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
spqr753@...

but the official Petitio Actionis must be sent to
NR_Cohors_Praetoria@yahoogroups.com


Given this the 6th day of March 2759 a.u.c (2006 C.E.) at 3:30 am
Roman time

In the consulship of Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus and Pompeia Minucia
Tiberia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42459 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
M. Hortensia Triario Catonique spd;
all monotheistic religions assume they are the endpoint,
except for the Bahai's interestingly enough, they still believe in
future manifestations of God & that also includes the Ismaili
Muslims who are highly influenced by Platonism and gnostic ideas.
Their Imam is known as was the original Imam 'Ali was as the 'face
of god' interestingly similar to what I printed about Astarte; the
face of Baal...
As for the Carotta book, where is there an academic review?
I glanced at the suppositions, and so what? Some people have this
utter fascination about Jesus, for me it's about even with Herod.
Historicial figure, move on...
Now Buddhism, Luctretius and Epicureanism, and Avatamsaka
philosophy interest me greatly!
bene valete
Marca Hortensia Maior

> > I made the point some time ago that every religion on earth
> > presents a way or path to "enlightenment" --- a book, a ritual or
> > series of rituals, a meditative process or processes --- except
> > Christianity. In Christianity we find the supreme presumption:
Christ
> > points only to Himself as the very endpoint of the search for
God.
>
> But this brushes aside the long history of Christian mysticism,
which
> _does_ seek such a path to enlightenment -- often on the grounds
that the
> nature of God/Christ/Paraclete is so transcendent as not to admit
of
> intellectual understanding, and that the records of the Bible do
not
> provide sufficient data to allow effective reasoning.
>
> People who follow this path are often condemned (and sometimes
used to be
> burned) by the official Church. A point in their favor, I would
say.
>
> -- Plblius Livios Triarius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42460 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
C. Equitius Cato Livio Triario quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Livius Triarius, you wrote:

"But this brushes aside the long history of Christian mysticism, which
_does_ seek such a path to enlightenment -- often on the grounds that
the nature of God/Christ/Paraclete is so transcendent as not to admit
of intellectual understanding, and that the records of the Bible do
not provide sufficient data to allow effective reasoning."


I would submit that mysticism is not brushed aside as long as the
mystic sees as his or her focal point the revelation of God in Christ.
Once the mystic begins to erode that theological understanding, they
have seperated themselves from the universal Church. I am *not*
saying they are bad or evil or morally corrupt, only that when they
step off of the path of the faith as received and passed on by the
Church, they are no longer Christian.

While Orthodoxy, as I said earlier, builds its theology upon the very
foundation of the ineffability of God in and of Himself, there is a
point at which the Christian recognizes and accepts that God has
chosen of His own infinite grace to reveal Himself in a particular way
--- through Himself incarnate as Jesus Christ.

Gnosticism, for example, tries to attain an understanding of God which
is "hidden" from the vast majority of humans; to seek to understand
and "know" God in a deeper mystical sense than is open to others.
Christianity declares that everything necessary for the salvation and
deification of mankind has already been revealed to the world ---
nothing is hidden or secret --- in His incarnation and salvific work
through Christ.

The Roman and Greek and Egyptian &c. concept of theophany is that a
god takes on human form, not that He or She actually *becomes* a human
being. And They usually do so for a specific purpose: to get chummy
with a mortal for carnal purposes like Iuppiter (although He'd turn
Himself into pretty much anything for that), to teach a lesson to an
arrogant or suppliant mortal like Minerva ("so, Arachne, you're a
pretty good weaver, huh?"), or to help Their favorite people like
Castor and Pollux at Lake Regillus. This concept follows very closely
on the supreme pragmatism of the Romans. They liked things which
produced *results* in a real and concrete way. This is a primary
reason why the religio is fundamentally orthopractic: you do certain
things, and you get something in return. The Gods have *told* you (or
the pontiffs or augurs or flamens) what They want you to do; do it,
and do it correctly, and They reward you. The pax deorum, the great
social contract with the Gods, is fulfilled. Do it really well and
with consistency, and the Gods give you...well, you get to rule the
known world --- or most of it :-)

Ten thousand furies and serpents! I'm exhausted and babbling. Off to
bed.

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42461 From: Tim Gallagher Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor Petitio actionis Domi
Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor

Petitio actionis Domitius Constantinus Fuscus against Caius Minucius Scaevola

This is formal notice that I am in receipt of his petitio actionis and will, according to the LEX SALICIA POENALIS XVII and the laws of Nova Roma, inform him within seventy-two hours of the status of his petitio actionis which reads:

Subject: Petitio Actionis against Caius Minucius Scaevola

Salve

Having Caius Minucius Scaevola, publicly and maliciously, stated, inter alias and in different posts:

"also note that, despite the prodigious quantities of verbiage that Fuscus pours onto this list - all either negative or insulting, to the best of my recollection - his comprehension of the written word remains abysmal."

"the voicing of opinions (...) Fuscus, who is determined to strangle it as soon as it appears?"

"All the rest of your /ad hominem/ nonsense has been elided, since I'm uninterested in wasting time on actually talking _to_ you rather than pointing out your attempts to destroy what you could never create."

being those statements unprovoked in the person of Caius Minucius Scaevola, clearly defamatory and demonstrably false in front of the judex or judices that the praetor will want to assign to the case, should he find merit in it.

Given the section XIV, number 1 of the Lex Salicia Poenalis which reads:

CALVMNIAE (Libel and Slander):

Whoever is proven to have made to a third party a false and defamatory statement about a person which has damaged the dignity or reputation of that person may be compelled to make a DECLARATIO PVBLICA: the convicted reus shall then present a public retraction and apology in order to restore the actor's dignity and reputation in one of Nova Roma's official venues within thirty days of the official announcement of the sentence.

Being Caius Minucius Scaevola not a sitting magistrate as resulting by the Album Civium, http://www.novaroma.org/bin/cpoints?id=3581<http://www.novaroma.org/bin/cpoints?id=3581>

I hereby issue a petitio actionis to the praetor Ti. Galerius Paulinus, and for knowledge to his colleague Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus to hear my complaint and follow the appropriate measures, including the notification of this request to the reus, for the case to be decided.

In faith,

Domitius Constantinus Fuscus

Founder of Gens Constantinia
Former Tribunus Plebis (MMDCCLVIII a. u. c.)
Former Aedilis Urbis Iterum (MMDCCLVII & MMDCCLVIII a. u. c.)


Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor

Given this the 6th day of March 2759 a.u.c (2006 C.E.) at 3:40 am Roman time
In the consulship of Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus and Pompeia Minucia Tiberia




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42462 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor Petitio actionis
M. Hortensia Scaevolae omnibus spd;
gosh I said way ruder things to him when we were tribunes! He's
suing Scaevola, this a guy who couldn't even remember to call a
plebeian election. Fusce! get a life and do something positive for NR,
you're just losing your dignitas...
bene valete
Marca Hortensia Maior



> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus
>
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42463 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Office Of Tribunes - Censorial Resignation Notice
Salvete omnes,

This is to let our citizens know that Gaius Municius Hardianus has
resigned from his office of Censor in Nova Roma.

He wrote to the proper authorities here a few days ago giving his
reason. I am not a liberty to go into details but I can say that it
has to do with new macronational responsibilities and has nothing
to with any problems or issues with Nova Roma. He is very clear in
saying that if he had known what was coming up he would not of asked
for our votes and taken on the responsibility of this office.
Nevertheless, Marcus Hadrianus will remain a citizen and continue on
as Pontifex in Nova Roma.

The main implication citizens, is that for the time being we shall
have just one censor until someone else steps up to the plate and
volunteers to run. Censor Marinus will certainly have his hands full
for the time being with this office and numerous other duties so I
would ask you all for patience and understanding when dealing with
this office which is still in good hands.


Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus

Plebis Tribunus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42464 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-05
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, gaiusequitiuscato wrote:

> C. Equitius Cato Livio Triario quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salve et salvete.
>
> Livius Triarius, you wrote:
>
> "But this brushes aside the long history of Christian mysticism, which
> _does_ seek such a path to enlightenment -- often on the grounds that
> the nature of God/Christ/Paraclete is so transcendent as not to admit
> of intellectual understanding, and that the records of the Bible do
> not provide sufficient data to allow effective reasoning."
>
> I would submit that mysticism is not brushed aside as long as the
> mystic sees as his or her focal point the revelation of God in Christ.
> Once the mystic begins to erode that theological understanding, they
> have seperated themselves from the universal Church. I am *not*
> saying they are bad or evil or morally corrupt, only that when they
> step off of the path of the faith as received and passed on by the
> Church, they are no longer Christian.

And here we enter the minefield indeed. The counterposition being
roughly: there is no "universal" Church and never was; it cannot,
therefore, have received or passed on anything but the views of mortal
men who were certainly fallible and often, by our standards, neither wise
nor just in their thinking.

Let's not go there.

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42465 From: robertpartlow Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
Salvete,

I cannot hope to be eliquent right now (too close to bedtime). But ,
I agree that there have been many who have transcended the bonds of
proscribed dogma (legislated by political, social and economic
necessity)through the ages. These have usually drifted toward a
general theme which is Eastern and or Pagan in nature. Take for
example St. Thomas (doubting Thomas) the Apostle who died in India
while proscelatising and of course learning from the Hindus, Jains,
Buddhists, etc. Given this there is also the fact that there is a
shrine to Jesus Christ in a good many Hindu Temples (so I've been
told by a professor ages ago). The fact that so many themes in
Zoroastrianism, Mithraism, Christianity and for that matter Judaism
and Islam have certain parallels in Eastern mysticism and philosophy
alludes to the fact there was much travel and trade throughout for
ages. There are also survivals of ancient Egyptian philosophy and
mysticism in Christianity and Judaism. There is also a similar
mindset between some of the basic themes of some of these and Native
American Religions. It is true that the Mediterranean Gods &
Goddesses "visited in corporeal form" but there are also the
traditions of them following the theme of dying and being reborn to
bring Light and Peace (nirvana) to human kind. Some have also been
born of a virgin. In times of peril and impending chaos there is a
need for this message to be redelivered. There I go raddeling off,
but the main jist I wish to convey is that Fear and devisiveness
cannot prevail and then for that matter maybe those who are in an
extreme tangent of this must sometimes be shocked back into the
middle (equilibrium) of an open mind and clear/peaceful spirit. Only
as a little child can one enter the (Kingdom of the Lord, Nirvana)
one whose spirit's weight is as of a feather can enter the presence
of Ra, by forgetting one's self and desire can one achieve true
happiness and enlightenment, only be being part of the "give away"
can one be in the harmony of the Great Spirit Wanatonka. May the
SWARTZ be with youuuuu.

Valve,
A. Claudius Scipio

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, dicconf <dicconf@...> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, gaiusequitiuscato wrote:
>
> > C. Equitius Cato Livio Triario quiritibusque S.P.D.
> >
> > Salve et salvete.
> >
> > Livius Triarius, you wrote:
> >
> > "But this brushes aside the long history of Christian mysticism,
which
> > _does_ seek such a path to enlightenment -- often on the grounds
that
> > the nature of God/Christ/Paraclete is so transcendent as not to
admit
> > of intellectual understanding, and that the records of the Bible
do
> > not provide sufficient data to allow effective reasoning."
> >
> > I would submit that mysticism is not brushed aside as long as the
> > mystic sees as his or her focal point the revelation of God in
Christ.
> > Once the mystic begins to erode that theological understanding,
they
> > have seperated themselves from the universal Church. I am *not*
> > saying they are bad or evil or morally corrupt, only that when
they
> > step off of the path of the faith as received and passed on by the
> > Church, they are no longer Christian.
>
> And here we enter the minefield indeed. The counterposition being
> roughly: there is no "universal" Church and never was; it cannot,
> therefore, have received or passed on anything but the views of
mortal
> men who were certainly fallible and often, by our standards,
neither wise
> nor just in their thinking.
>
> Let's not go there.
>
> -- Publius Livius Triarius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42466 From: robertpartlow Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Off Topic. Canadians in Afghanistan
Salve Pompeia Minucia Tiberia,

I agree and yearn to keep others feelings in mind as long as I can
subdue my passions (of course keeping in mind that NA is to be of a
higher purpose). I, like the former military animal that I am, feel
this need to shock and awe the perverbial antagonist. May we all try
to keep to better and higher things (if that is, of course, alright
with all you unseen antagonists out there, hhmmmm???).

Roma Lux est,

A. Claudius Scipio

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> ---Salve Claudius Scipio:
>
> The only darned problem is, we cannot blame the U.S. Forces per
> se....they can't go on strike because they don't agree with their
> president's agenda. Not without any meaningful outcome all
> around....doesn't matter how many of them morphed into Hanoi Jane.
> Approximately 50% of Americans do not agree with the conflict in
> Iraq...If it were left up to these 50% or so, we wouldn't be having
> this discussion.
>
> Anyway, I, personally don't want to pursue this thread any further,
> as it encroaches on a sensitive issue which NR can't do very much
> about, and alot of the folks being spoken of in this are also NR
> citizens. But I felt I needed to say something...In all virtue,I
> think we have to be careful to separate those suffering the
> consequences of the conflict, including a portion of the U.S.
> forces, from those 'big cheezes' who decided to initiate the
> conflict, when we assign responsibility or blame .
>
> Fides
> Pompeia
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "robertpartlow" <robertpartlow@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete Omnis,
> >
> > I have faith in the forces of Canada and the UK because of their
> > attitudes at home and because of their willingness to cooperate
> with
> > the UN. I trust they will continue to be a positive and
> constructive
> > force where ever they are assigned. I only hope that the U.S.
> forces
> > will learn from their example and disregard directives resulting
> from
> > the destructive jingoism and knee-jerk patriotism behind what
they
> > may recieve from the current U.S. administration. All Hail the
> > Peacekeepers and those who quell the destructive fundamentalists
> such
> > as the Taliban, Baathists and American Neo-Cons!
> >
> > Valvete,
> > A. Claudius Scipio
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
> > <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@> wrote:
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Salve Veni et Salvete Omnes:
> > >
> > > As a Canukian I thank you very much...our boys and girls have
> been
> > > at this in 'Stan' since 2001. Operation Apollo, Operation
> Athena,
> > > etc. That's us. We tend to lean to the Greek with our
Military
> > > mission nomenclature, ...but we fight like Romans when we have
> to.
> > >
> > > It's like Taliban... like....take off, ok?
> > > (The MacKenzie Brothers)
> > > Canukians 'keep their stick on the ice'
> > > (Red Green)
> > >
> > > Hey, this is not just military, this is 'culture' up here!
> > >
> > > Pompeia :)
> > > (Proud to be the first Roman Canadian Consul of Nova Roma)
> > >
> > > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus"
> > > <wend1066@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > veletudo omnes;
> > > >
> > > > On 3/2/06, QFabiusMaxmi@ <QFabiusMaxmi@> wrote:
> > > > > I wanted to show this to the Canadians on the list, to show
> > your
> > > current
> > > > > involvement in
> > > > > the "War against Terror" You have our thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Q. Fabius Maximus
> > > > >
> > > > > In a message dated 2/28/2006 2:55:38 P.M. Pacific Standard
> Time,
> > > > > moderncrossfire@yahoogroups.com writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > KANDAHAR, Afghanistan - They call them "sura espiyan,"
> Pashtun
> > > for "red
> > > > > dogs," and the LAV III armoured vehicles are "bala,"
> > > or "monsters."
> > > > >
> > > > > [respectful excision]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > In deed, thank you to our friends and allies of Canada!!!
> > > >
> > > > Sertorius, may That Which Is Holy watch over
> > > > and keep you and your comrades safe when you are in harm's
way.
> > > >
> > > > =========================================
> > > > In amicitia quod fides -
> > > > Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> > > >
> > > > Veteran: PFC Vermont Army National Guard - SSgt USAF Reserve
> > > > Whose great grandmother Robinson's maiden name was Allard,
> > > > being a woman of Acadian-Miqmaq and Mohawk parentage.
> > > >
> > > > http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> > > > http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> > > > http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
> > > > --
> > > > May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> > > > May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> > > > May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42467 From: Michael Costa Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: A few religious questions - just to clear things up
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Asinius Pollio"
<smaitee@...> wrote:
>
> Vale
>
> > M. Hortensia omnibus spd;
> > all right I've read the site & frankly you'd make a better
> > argument using Teixidor's "The Pagan God" and equating Jesus
with
> > any number of youthful gods, Adonis, Melqart, Orpheus etc....
>
> It's often strange how fast people can apparently read, especially
a book that would
> usually take at least several days to go through, let alone to
understand. But your reaction
> and your remark is very understandable: as a "mystery-lover" you
belong - in the context
> of the Jesus-Caesar discovery - to the category of the
(esoterical) obscurantists: you
> expect Jesus not only to be a myth himself but to be a patchwork
of ancient East European
> and Near Eastern myths. This is pathetic! (Ever hear of Occam's
razor?) This is even worse
> than what's coming from standard atheists, because you rely on
nothing at all to explain
> whatever religious phenomenon you can get your hands on. Sure,
when all is a myth, there
> is no Gordian knot, but there is also only just hot air: a state
of maximum spiritual
> entropy, a religious dead zone the world has been buried in for
thousands of years. This is
> really how you like it? I'm devastated how people can treat things
in such disrespect,
> including themselves.
>
> On the contrary to what you write, one would have to connect
ancient myths and Gods not
> to Jesus, but one would first need to show them in the divine
Caesar (and the Divi filius) or
> at least in their theopolitics, otherwise these myths and ancient
beliefs could never have
> ended up in the Jesus-legend. But to quote the author, I'm not
here to fight windmills,
> because you don't seem to be keen on debating this matter
thoroughly and sincerely
> anyway. So I urge you to not answer to this topic any longer,
because it's apparently not
> your cup of tea.
>
> > I mean if you are keen to worship Divus Julius, go right
ahead,
>
> It's not about religion, it's about the HISTORY and ARCHAEOLOGY of
religion. But to
> answer your remark: as a Christian I don't need to decide on
worshipping the Divus Iulius.
> In Christianity we have something called baptism, and therefore I
am already worshipping
> him, and always have, like every other Christian too. Jesus - this
we know now - was never
> a myth, only a mystery, but that mystery has been solved, which
means that as a
> "mystery-lover" you have to find yourself another one.
>
> Regards
> Asinius Pollio
>
Vale,
The subject is that the Egyptian god Horus was the true Christ
(KRST), as known from pre-Jesus stories in circulation for hundreds
of years - check Wikipedia.com. A comparison was made long ago that
proves this theory. At least 200 comparisons , almost identical to
Jesus' history, were given. I invite anyone to research this and
prove it wrong... BTW I am not Christian, I am born-again
Roman/Egyptian. So an outside view may be in order for a consensus
or unbiased discussion.

Tiberius Calpurnias Rex, Nova Roma, MMVI.
*Reborn Gaius Julius Caesar & Gaius Caesar Caligula,
www.xlibris.com/Superphysicsetc.html
www.xlibris.com/Applied Superphysics . html
:)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42468 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC: Alkeehol & other adult topics
> Salue, P. D.A., et saluete, omnes.
>
> Are we allowed to discuss Star Trek as it relates to Rome or Nova Roma.
>
> ATS: Of course, within limitations. The notation off topic should be
> included, too.
>
> If
> I recall they drank Alcohol on Star Trek
>
> ATS: I think it was some fake stuff called Œsynthehol,¹ [spelling uncertain]
> which apparently looked and tasted like the real thing, but lacked the
> intoxicating properties. Sensible starship crews do want to be sober, lest
> they encounter subspace anomalies or hostile aliens without warning...
>
> and I don't think anyone ever said
> that Star Trek was bad for the chitlens.
>
> ATS: I think chitlens [chitlins] is a southern food consisting of animal
> innards...no one said anything about that.
>
> Then again Capt Kirk occasionally
> was excessively friendly to lovely blue alien ladies. ;-)
>
> ATS: Color was no object with JTK.
>
> Come on wasn't the Roman episode one of everyone's favorite episodes?
> --
>> >|P. Dominus Antonius|<
> Tony Dah m
>
> Vale,
>
> Scholastica
>
> And let this subject rest in peace.
>
> Oderint dum metuant - Cicero
> Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius
>
> On 3/3/06, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > F. Galerius Aurelianus S.P.D.
>> >
>> > Scotch? If I wanted the taste of bog in my rye whisky, I would drink
>> > Scotch
>> > but otherwise "No." As a famous person once said, "Scotch? It was
>> > inwented
>> > by a little old lady in Leningrad!"
>> >
>> > FGA: This remark was made before we was warned about the thread being any
>> > appropriate. Besides, it's a Star Trek quote.
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42469 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: CONVENTUS . . . almost . .Conventiculum.BoreoOccidentalis
G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana omnes SPD.

Here's a feature from the website of BOREOOCDIDENTALIS, based
out of Wenatchee Valley College in Washington State USA.

Ruins-deprived North American Cives may be interested in
supporting colleges and universities that put together such
Conventicula. They are closer to home, and the organizing is
already done.

Valete bene in pace Deorum

G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana

Website: www.wenval.cc/boreooccidentales/boreo_latin/conventilculum.asp

==========================================================
Seattli in Vniversitatis Vasintoniensis campo
mense Iunio exeunte ineunteque mense Iulio anni MMVI.

Sessiones praeparatoriae: diebus 23o et 24o mensis Iunii

Conventiculum praecipuum: de die 25o usque per diem 1um m. Iulii


Moderabuntur

▪Stephanus Berard, Ph.D., professor linguarum apud
Studiorum Collegium Vallis Aqualbensis

▪Iacobus Dobreff, M.A., Gradus Doctoralis Candidatus apud
Vniversitatem Lundiensem atque unus ex editoribus illius "Axel
Oxenstierna Correspondence Project"

▪Akihiko Watanabe, Ph.D., magister praelectorque apud
Facultatem Linguarum Modernarum et Classicarum Vniversitatis
Vasintoniae Occidentalis.

Aderunt et alii moderatores volubiliter Latine loqui valentes.

Hoc Conventiculum optimam praebebit occasionem sermonem Latinum
vivissimo modo exercitandi, nam singulis fere diebus excursiones
didascalicas faciemus in quibus licebit participibus non solum
sermones sponte conserere sed etiam omnia quae viderint
fecerintque sermone Latino, adiuvantibus moderatoribus, fuse
describere. Ruri et in hortis colloquemur de arboribus et
plantis, montibus et molibus glacialibus, fluviis, bestiis,
avibus, insectis, caelo aliisque multis. In urbe argumenta
nostra erunt omnia urbana: artes omnes et oblectamenta,
aedificia et vehicula, portus navesque, negotia, tabernae,
libri, vestes, ludi athletici et ita porro. Imprimis placebit
huiusmodi conventiculum eis quibus cordi sint variae amoenitates
locorum (sive rusticorum sive urbanorum) quique ament amice
garrientes variaque facientes modo "kinaesthetico" dicto linguae
peritiam meliorem reddere.

Quibus sit Idoneum Conventiculum

Aeque invitantur et ludi magistri et praeceptores scholarum
superiorum et professores, enixeque commendamus conventiculum
hoc studiosis linguarum classicarum graduatis non tantum quod
facultas Latine dicendi peritiam et legendi et scribendi mirum
in modum corroborat verum etiam quod, ut Latinitas viva, quae
nobis cordi est et ad quam nitimur, prorsus renascatur, imprimis
necesse est ipsis futuris praeceptoribus linguam nostram pro
instrumento omnino ad vivendum apto habere eamque ut omnibus
demum rebus humanis, vel modernissimis, exprimendis parem
tractent et doceant. Etiam eos qui fundamenta grammatica Latina
didicerint Latineque iam satis bene legere valeant necdum tamen
Latine colloqui possint ex animo cohortamur ut hoc conventiculum
participent primosque suos sermones Latinos nobiscum serant. In
conventiculis nostris colloquio Latino datis nullo modo est eis
trepidandum erubescendumve qui nondum Latine locuti sint; nam nos fere
omnes potius nuper quam pridem initium Latine loquendi fecimus,
cuius initii difficultatem funditus comprehendimus.



De Sessionibus Praeparatoriis

Omnibus qui aliquot loquelae Latinae elementa generalia
exercitare velint erit occasio paucis diebus ante conventiculum
incohatum adveniendi ut diebus 23o et 24o mensis Iunii varias
res familiariores una cum Stephano Berard et Iacobo Dobreff et
forsan aliis moderatoribus Latino sermone celebrent, verba nova
locutionesque utiles discant, linguam sibi aliquantum solvant,
fiduciam loquendi firment.

De Nominibus Dandis ad Conventiculum Participandum

Ad Conventiculum Vasintoniense habendum coniungunt opus et
vires Collegium Vallis Aqualbensis et Vniversitas Vasintoniae.
Vt locum in Conventiculo petas mitte schedulam petitionis ad:
Pam Kelley, Administrative Assistant, Liberal Arts and Sciences,
Wenatchee Valley College, 1300 Fifth Street, Wenatchee, WA 98801.

Hic ice ut schedulam petitionis depromas.


De Deversoriis, Cibis, Pretiis, Talibusque Singulis

Omnia talia singula per studiorum Vniversitatem Vasintoniae
administrabuntur. Simulatque universitatis ministri condiciones
omnino patefecerint, Conventiculum participaturos de omnibus
singulis certiores faciemus necnon praeconium plenius et hoc
loco statuemus et per cursum electronicum aliterque divulgabimus.
Pretia autem haec fere fore videntur. Pro duplici conclavi
solvet quisque cotidie 30 thaleros et pro cibis 15. Qui simplex
conclave cupiet paulo plus impendet. Quae quidem pretia paulo
maiora sunt quam quae vel Aquis Albis vel Lexintoniae solvere
solent plerique; sed si ad pulcherrimam florentissimamque necnon
et sumptuosiorem urbem Seattli atque etiam ad amoenissimum
universitatis campum spectatur, talia pretia re vera modica
apparent. Conventicula Vasintoniensia sunt videlicet multis
non tantum discendi verum etiam dies feriatos iucundos agendi
occasiones. Discipulos hortamur ut stipendia a Conventiculo
petant, quae stidendia non solum ad deversandi ciborumque
sumptus sed etiam ad excursionum pretia adhiberi poterunt.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42470 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: prid. Non. Mar.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est pridie Nones Martias; haec dies comitialis est.

"When the sixth sun climbs Olympus' slopes from ocean,
And takes his way through the sky behind winged horses,
All you who worship at the shrine of chaste Vesta,
Give thanks to her, and offer incense on the Trojan hearth.
To the countless titles Caesar chose to earn,
The honour of the High Priesthood was added.
Caesar's eternal godhead protects the eternal fire,
You may see the pledges of empire conjoined.
Gods of ancient Troy, worthiest prize for that Aeneas
Who carried you, your burden saving him from the enemy,
A priest of Aeneas' line touches your divine kindred:
Vesta in turn guard the life of your kin!
You fires, burn on, nursed by his sacred hand:
Live undying, our leader, and your flames, I pray." - Ovid, Fasti III

"What plain is not enriched with Latin blood, to bear witness with its
graves to our unholy strife.... What pool or stream has failed to
taste dismal war! What sea has Italian slaughter not discolored! What
coast knows not our blood!" - Horace, Odes and Epodes


"Tarquinius also built the Circus Maximus, which lies between the
Aventine and Palatine Hills, and was the first to erect covered seats
round it on scaffolding (for till then the spectators had stood), the
wooden stands being supported by beams. And dividing the places among
the thirty curiae, he assigned to each curia a particular section, so
that every spectator was seated in his proper place. This work also
was destined to become in time one of the most beautiful and most
admirable structures in Rome. For the Circus is three stades and a
half in length and four plethra in breadth. Round about it on the two
longer sides and one of the shorter sides a canal has been dug, ten
feet in depth and width, to receive water. Behind the canal are
erected porticos three stories high, of which the lowest story has
stone seats, gradually rising, as in the theatres, one above the
other, and the two upper stories wooden seats. The two longer
porticos are united into one and joined together by means of the
shorter one, which is crescent-shaped, so that all three form a single
portico like an amphitheatre, eight stades in circuit and capable of
holding 150,000 persons. The other of the shorter sides is left
uncovered and contains vaulted starting-places for the horses, which
are all opened by means of a single rope. On the outside of the
Circus there is another portico of one story which has shops in it and
habitations over them. In this portico there are entrances and ascents
for the spectators at every shop, so that the countless thousands of
people may enter and depart without inconvenience.

This king also undertook to construct the temple to Jupiter, Juno and
Minerva, in fulfilment of the vow he had made to these gods in his
last battle against the Sabines. Having, therefore, surrounded the
hill on which he proposed to build the temple with high retaining
walls in many places, since it required much preparation (for it was
neither easy of access nor level, but steep, and terminated in a sharp
peak), he filled in the space between the retaining walls and the
summit with great quantities of earth and, by levelling it, made the
place most suitable for receiving temples. But he was prevented by
death from laying the foundations of the temple; for he lived but four
years after the end of the war. Many years later, however, Tarquinius,
the second king after him, the one who was driven from the throne,
laid the founds of this structure and built the greater part of it.
Yet even he did not complete the work, but it was finished under the
annual magistrates who were consuls in the third year after his
expulsion. It is fitting to relate also the incidents that preceded
the building of it as they have been handed down by all the compilers
of Roman history. When Tarquinius was preparing to build the temple
he called the augurs together and ordered them first to consult the
auspices concerning the site itself, in order to learn what place in
the city was the most suitable to be consecrated and the most
acceptable to the gods themselves; and upon their indicating the hill
that commands the Forum, which was then called the Tarpeian, but now
the Capitoline Hill, he ordered them to consult the auspices once more
and declare in what part of the hill the foundations must be laid. But
this was not at all easy; for there were upon the hill many altars
both of the gods and of the lesser divinities not far apart from one
another, which would have to be moved to some other place and the
whole area given up to the sanctuary that was to be built to the gods.
The augurs thought proper to consult the auspices concerning each one
of the altars that were erected there, and if the gods were willing to
withdraw, then to move them elsewhere. The rest of the gods and lesser
divinities, then, gave them leave to move their altars elsewhere, but
Terminus and Juventas, although the augurs besought them with great
earnestness and importunity, could not be prevailed on and refused to
leave their places. Accordingly, their altars were included within the
circuit of the temples, and one of them now stands in the vestibule of
Minerva's shrine and the other in the shrine itself near the statue of
the goddess. From this circumstance the augurs concluded that no
occasion would ever cause the removal of the boundaries of the Romans'
city or impair its vigour; and both have proved true down to my day,
which is already the twenty-fourth generation." - Dionysius of
Halicarnassus 3.68-69

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Homer, Ovid, Dionysius of Halicarnassus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42471 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor Petitio actionis
On 3/6/06, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Fusce! get a life and do something positive for NR,
> you're just losing your dignitas...
>


Did he ever have any???

Merula

--
> Chaos, confusion, disorder - my work here is done


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42472 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor Petitio actionis
> Petitio actionis Domitius Constantinus Fuscus against Caius Minucius Scaevola

What we have here is another time-wasting bogus "suit" from a well-known
serial lawwanker.

For the record, I concur 100% with the honourable Scaevola's opinion. Fuscus
isn't here to create, he's here to tear down, and to harass anyone who bruises
his fragile ego.

Go play somewhere else, Fuscus.

Vale, Octavius.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42473 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor Petitio actionis
Salve

On 3/6/06, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> wrote:
>
> (...) from a well-known serial lawwanker.
> (...) Go play somewhere else, Fuscus.

Ah, Octavius, senator of the republic, model of civilty, language
correctness and of superior social behaviour and dignitas for all the
cives of Nova Roma...

DCF
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42474 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor Petitio actionis
On 3/6/06, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus <dom.con.fus@...> wrote:
>
>
> Ah, Octavius, senator of the republic, model of civilty, language
> correctness and of superior social behaviour and dignitas for all the
> cives of Nova Roma...


Isn't it lovely when one citizen so appreciates another?

Merula

Chaos, confusion, disorder - my work here is done


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42475 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor Petitio actionis
> Ah, Octavius, senator of the republic, model of civilty, language
> correctness and of superior social behaviour and dignitas for all the
> cives of Nova Roma...

I'm confident that, considering my accomplishments (the latest being
the creation of a Wiki, enabling citizen participation in editing the
web site), that my reputation can withstand a bit of squabbling with
one such as yourself.

What have *you* contributed that is sufficient to offset the evil
you bring with these suits? Have you done anything positive for
Nova Roma, ever?

Octavius.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42476 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: A few religious questions - just to clear things up--From the flame
F. Galerius Aurelianus flamen Cerialis S.P.D.

One need not be a citizen of Nova Roma to be on the Nova Roma list and it is possible that Gaius Asinius Polio is a former citizen who had another name or this is just his pseudonym. As we are an open forum here, he can make what remarks he wishes as long as he does not blaspheme or use offensive language. Scipio, he has a perfect right to come across as a narrow-minded, bible-thumping jingoist because faith doesn't have to based on logic or historiography or archaeology. Here in Nova Roma, we must respect each other's views and beliefs as long as it doesn't threaten the peace and concord of the organization and as long as Dii Immortales receive the public honor that is required.

Polio, I would suggest that you practice better rhetoric when offering the views of your faith as you are leaning towards being somewhat offensive and overbearing. Nova Roma is an organization based on the restoration and reconstruction of the Religio Romana, the indigenous and foreign sacred practices of the ancient Romans but we leave room for Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians, and faiths that did not exist during the Roman period from the founding of the City to the removal of the Altar of Victory from the Senate house. Jesus Christ is likely the son of God but you should not take that to mean he is the only son of God as there have been many others. Baptism no more makes you a follower of Jesus Christ than going into a garage makes you a car. Only by following the examples and practices of Jesus set forth in the Gospels--tolerance, honesty, piety, sacrifice, and love for your fellow man--can you be a true follower of Jesus in the Christian sense of the word.

Many of us who follow the Sacra et Religio do not reject Jesus Christ as a son of God, we just do not see him as the only son of God nor do we accept him as our personal savior who died for our sins. We view him in a manner consistent with other sons of God--Horus, Mithras, Dionysius.


GAP: I'm not here to fight windmills, because you don't seem to be keen on debating this matter
thoroughly and sincerely anyway. So I urge you to not answer to this topic any longer, because it's apparently not
your cup of tea.
FGA: This last remark is brusk to the point of rudeness, Polio, and one should never take this kind of tone with a lady.

GAP: Jesus - this we know now - was never a myth, only a mystery, but that mystery has been solved, which
means that as a "mystery-lover" you have to find yourself another one.
FGA: Now this was very eloquent and quite well put. I strongly suggest to all individuals who choose to become involved in debates on religion as opposed to debates on the Religio, to remember that passionate faith and active spirituality are not subjects that can be discussed without some heat, some fire as it deals with faith. Faith is not something that be coldly objectified but we can all remain polite with one another.

Regards
Asinius Pollio


Vadete in pacem Cereri.







Yahoo! Groups Links






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42477 From: Karen Blackburn Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
I am interested in purchasing the roman calendar but have not managed to find your details. Could you please reply with an email address/web page where I can order from. Many thanks.
Ivlia Vespasia

--- e.curia@... wrote:

From: Emilia Curia Finnica <e.curia@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman Calendar
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 08:21:21 +0200

Salvete Merula et omnes,

Thank you! I'm very happy that you have liked our design for the
calendar!

For anyone who hasn't yet ordered one, we now have the option of
posting in 1st class, which is much faster.


On Mar 1, 2006, at 3:29, Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com wrote:

> Message: 18
> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:03:28 +0000
> From: "Kirsteen Wright" <kirsteen.falconsfan@...>
> Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
>
> On 2/28/06, Peter Bird <p.bird@...> wrote:
>>
>> Salve Servili et salvete omnes -
>>
>> I've had my calendar for some time and it's superb! Not only is it
>> most
>> informative, but it is elegant also. Congratulations to the designers.
>>
>> Sextus Pontius Pilatus Barbatus
>
>
> Yes I agree It's beautiful. I hope they continue to produce them for
> next
> year
>
> Merula
>
> --
> Chaos, confusion, disorder - my work here is done

Valete,

Emilia Curia Finnica
Custos
Scriba Araniae Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
Senatrix




Yahoo! Groups Links
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42478 From: duy mai Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: CONVENTUS . . . almost . .Conventiculum.BoreoOccidentalis
i'm definately interested but would like more info. however, the website link doesn't seem to work.

"G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana" <silvanatextrix@...> wrote: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana omnes SPD.

Here's a feature from the website of BOREOOCDIDENTALIS, based
out of Wenatchee Valley College in Washington State USA.

Ruins-deprived North American Cives may be interested in
supporting colleges and universities that put together such
Conventicula. They are closer to home, and the organizing is
already done.

Valete bene in pace Deorum

G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana

Website: www.wenval.cc/boreooccidentales/boreo_latin/conventilculum.asp

==========================================================
Seattli in Vniversitatis Vasintoniensis campo
mense Iunio exeunte ineunteque mense Iulio anni MMVI.

Sessiones praeparatoriae: diebus 23o et 24o mensis Iunii

Conventiculum praecipuum: de die 25o usque per diem 1um m. Iulii


Moderabuntur

▪Stephanus Berard, Ph.D., professor linguarum apud
Studiorum Collegium Vallis Aqualbensis

▪Iacobus Dobreff, M.A., Gradus Doctoralis Candidatus apud
Vniversitatem Lundiensem atque unus ex editoribus illius "Axel
Oxenstierna Correspondence Project"

▪Akihiko Watanabe, Ph.D., magister praelectorque apud
Facultatem Linguarum Modernarum et Classicarum Vniversitatis
Vasintoniae Occidentalis.

Aderunt et alii moderatores volubiliter Latine loqui valentes.

Hoc Conventiculum optimam praebebit occasionem sermonem Latinum
vivissimo modo exercitandi, nam singulis fere diebus excursiones
didascalicas faciemus in quibus licebit participibus non solum
sermones sponte conserere sed etiam omnia quae viderint
fecerintque sermone Latino, adiuvantibus moderatoribus, fuse
describere. Ruri et in hortis colloquemur de arboribus et
plantis, montibus et molibus glacialibus, fluviis, bestiis,
avibus, insectis, caelo aliisque multis. In urbe argumenta
nostra erunt omnia urbana: artes omnes et oblectamenta,
aedificia et vehicula, portus navesque, negotia, tabernae,
libri, vestes, ludi athletici et ita porro. Imprimis placebit
huiusmodi conventiculum eis quibus cordi sint variae amoenitates
locorum (sive rusticorum sive urbanorum) quique ament amice
garrientes variaque facientes modo "kinaesthetico" dicto linguae
peritiam meliorem reddere.

Quibus sit Idoneum Conventiculum

Aeque invitantur et ludi magistri et praeceptores scholarum
superiorum et professores, enixeque commendamus conventiculum
hoc studiosis linguarum classicarum graduatis non tantum quod
facultas Latine dicendi peritiam et legendi et scribendi mirum
in modum corroborat verum etiam quod, ut Latinitas viva, quae
nobis cordi est et ad quam nitimur, prorsus renascatur, imprimis
necesse est ipsis futuris praeceptoribus linguam nostram pro
instrumento omnino ad vivendum apto habere eamque ut omnibus
demum rebus humanis, vel modernissimis, exprimendis parem
tractent et doceant. Etiam eos qui fundamenta grammatica Latina
didicerint Latineque iam satis bene legere valeant necdum tamen
Latine colloqui possint ex animo cohortamur ut hoc conventiculum
participent primosque suos sermones Latinos nobiscum serant. In
conventiculis nostris colloquio Latino datis nullo modo est eis
trepidandum erubescendumve qui nondum Latine locuti sint; nam nos fere
omnes potius nuper quam pridem initium Latine loquendi fecimus,
cuius initii difficultatem funditus comprehendimus.



De Sessionibus Praeparatoriis

Omnibus qui aliquot loquelae Latinae elementa generalia
exercitare velint erit occasio paucis diebus ante conventiculum
incohatum adveniendi ut diebus 23o et 24o mensis Iunii varias
res familiariores una cum Stephano Berard et Iacobo Dobreff et
forsan aliis moderatoribus Latino sermone celebrent, verba nova
locutionesque utiles discant, linguam sibi aliquantum solvant,
fiduciam loquendi firment.

De Nominibus Dandis ad Conventiculum Participandum

Ad Conventiculum Vasintoniense habendum coniungunt opus et
vires Collegium Vallis Aqualbensis et Vniversitas Vasintoniae.
Vt locum in Conventiculo petas mitte schedulam petitionis ad:
Pam Kelley, Administrative Assistant, Liberal Arts and Sciences,
Wenatchee Valley College, 1300 Fifth Street, Wenatchee, WA 98801.

Hic ice ut schedulam petitionis depromas.


De Deversoriis, Cibis, Pretiis, Talibusque Singulis

Omnia talia singula per studiorum Vniversitatem Vasintoniae
administrabuntur. Simulatque universitatis ministri condiciones
omnino patefecerint, Conventiculum participaturos de omnibus
singulis certiores faciemus necnon praeconium plenius et hoc
loco statuemus et per cursum electronicum aliterque divulgabimus.
Pretia autem haec fere fore videntur. Pro duplici conclavi
solvet quisque cotidie 30 thaleros et pro cibis 15. Qui simplex
conclave cupiet paulo plus impendet. Quae quidem pretia paulo
maiora sunt quam quae vel Aquis Albis vel Lexintoniae solvere
solent plerique; sed si ad pulcherrimam florentissimamque necnon
et sumptuosiorem urbem Seattli atque etiam ad amoenissimum
universitatis campum spectatur, talia pretia re vera modica
apparent. Conventicula Vasintoniensia sunt videlicet multis
non tantum discendi verum etiam dies feriatos iucundos agendi
occasiones. Discipulos hortamur ut stipendia a Conventiculo
petant, quae stidendia non solum ad deversandi ciborumque
sumptus sed etiam ad excursionum pretia adhiberi poterunt.






SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





---------------------------------
Brings words and photos together (easily) with
PhotoMail - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42479 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
Salve Iulia Vespasia,

Karen Blackburn <Iulia-Vespasia@...> writes:

> I am interested in purchasing the roman calendar but have not managed to
> find your details. Could you please reply with an email address/web page
> where I can order from. Many thanks.

If you'll go to the main Nova Roma page at http://novaroma.org/main.html and
scroll down, you'll find a link about 3/5 of the way down which says "Roman
Wall Calendar. Order Yours Today!" Click on that link and it will take you
to the order form at http://www.insulaumbra.com/calendar/

(Or just go directly to the order form and save a click.)

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42480 From: Tita Artoria Marcella Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC: Alkeehol & other adult topics
Salve et salvete,

> PDA: If
> I recall they drank Alcohol on Star Trek
>
> ATS: I think it was some fake stuff called Osynthehol,¹ [spelling uncertain]
> which apparently looked and tasted like the real thing, but lacked the
> intoxicating properties.

Synthehol made its debut in the original series' offspring, the politically correct "Star Trek: The Next Generation." The Saurian brandy, Romulan Ale, scotch, vodka, wine, and green stuff imbibed during the original show was supposed to be real alcohol.

Artoria

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42481 From: duy mai Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC: Alkeehol & other adult topics
nothing beats Klingon blood wine!

Tita Artoria Marcella <icehunter@...> wrote: Salve et salvete,

> PDA: If
> I recall they drank Alcohol on Star Trek
>
> ATS: I think it was some fake stuff called Osynthehol,¹ [spelling uncertain]
> which apparently looked and tasted like the real thing, but lacked the
> intoxicating properties.

Synthehol made its debut in the original series' offspring, the politically correct "Star Trek: The Next Generation." The Saurian brandy, Romulan Ale, scotch, vodka, wine, and green stuff imbibed during the original show was supposed to be real alcohol.

Artoria

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42482 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: CONVENTUS . . . almost . .Conventiculum.BoreoOccidentalis
> Salue, interlocutor inscite, salve, G. Aurelia Falconis Siluana, et saluete,
> omnes!
>
> ATS: GAFS, mitte hanc ad Sodalitatem, amabo te.
>
> i'm definately interested but would like more info. however, the website link
> doesn't seem to work.
>
> ATS: Can you read the Latin? If so, you belong in the sodalitas
> Latinitatis! Please join us! The link is perhaps misspelled, with an extra
> l: it should be conventiculum. Try that. Boreo[o]ccidentalis may help, too.
>
> Valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
> "G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana" <silvanatextrix@...> wrote: G. Aurelia
> Falconis Silvana omnes SPD.
>
> Here's a feature from the website of BOREOOCDIDENTALIS, based
> out of Wenatchee Valley College in Washington State USA.
>
> Ruins-deprived North American Cives may be interested in
> supporting colleges and universities that put together such
> Conventicula. They are closer to home, and the organizing is
> already done.
>
> Valete bene in pace Deorum
>
> G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana
>
> Website: www.wenval.cc/boreooccidentales/boreo_latin/conventilculum.asp
>
> ==========================================================
> Seattli in Vniversitatis Vasintoniensis campo
> mense Iunio exeunte ineunteque mense Iulio anni MMVI.
>
> Sessiones praeparatoriae: diebus 23o et 24o mensis Iunii
>
> Conventiculum praecipuum: de die 25o usque per diem 1um m. Iulii
>
>
> Moderabuntur
>
> ▪Stephanus Berard, Ph.D., professor linguarum apud
> Studiorum Collegium Vallis Aqualbensis
>
> ▪Iacobus Dobreff, M.A., Gradus Doctoralis Candidatus apud
> Vniversitatem Lundiensem atque unus ex editoribus illius "Axel
> Oxenstierna Correspondence Project"
>
> ▪Akihiko Watanabe, Ph.D., magister praelectorque apud
> Facultatem Linguarum Modernarum et Classicarum Vniversitatis
> Vasintoniae Occidentalis.
>
> Aderunt et alii moderatores volubiliter Latine loqui valentes.
>
> Hoc Conventiculum optimam praebebit occasionem sermonem Latinum
> vivissimo modo exercitandi, nam singulis fere diebus excursiones
> didascalicas faciemus in quibus licebit participibus non solum
> sermones sponte conserere sed etiam omnia quae viderint
> fecerintque sermone Latino, adiuvantibus moderatoribus, fuse
> describere. Ruri et in hortis colloquemur de arboribus et
> plantis, montibus et molibus glacialibus, fluviis, bestiis,
> avibus, insectis, caelo aliisque multis. In urbe argumenta
> nostra erunt omnia urbana: artes omnes et oblectamenta,
> aedificia et vehicula, portus navesque, negotia, tabernae,
> libri, vestes, ludi athletici et ita porro. Imprimis placebit
> huiusmodi conventiculum eis quibus cordi sint variae amoenitates
> locorum (sive rusticorum sive urbanorum) quique ament amice
> garrientes variaque facientes modo "kinaesthetico" dicto linguae
> peritiam meliorem reddere.
>
> Quibus sit Idoneum Conventiculum
>
> Aeque invitantur et ludi magistri et praeceptores scholarum
> superiorum et professores, enixeque commendamus conventiculum
> hoc studiosis linguarum classicarum graduatis non tantum quod
> facultas Latine dicendi peritiam et legendi et scribendi mirum
> in modum corroborat verum etiam quod, ut Latinitas viva, quae
> nobis cordi est et ad quam nitimur, prorsus renascatur, imprimis
> necesse est ipsis futuris praeceptoribus linguam nostram pro
> instrumento omnino ad vivendum apto habere eamque ut omnibus
> demum rebus humanis, vel modernissimis, exprimendis parem
> tractent et doceant. Etiam eos qui fundamenta grammatica Latina
> didicerint Latineque iam satis bene legere valeant necdum tamen
> Latine colloqui possint ex animo cohortamur ut hoc conventiculum
> participent primosque suos sermones Latinos nobiscum serant. In
> conventiculis nostris colloquio Latino datis nullo modo est eis
> trepidandum erubescendumve qui nondum Latine locuti sint; nam nos fere
> omnes potius nuper quam pridem initium Latine loquendi fecimus,
> cuius initii difficultatem funditus comprehendimus.
>
>
>
> De Sessionibus Praeparatoriis
>
> Omnibus qui aliquot loquelae Latinae elementa generalia
> exercitare velint erit occasio paucis diebus ante conventiculum
> incohatum adveniendi ut diebus 23o et 24o mensis Iunii varias
> res familiariores una cum Stephano Berard et Iacobo Dobreff et
> forsan aliis moderatoribus Latino sermone celebrent, verba nova
> locutionesque utiles discant, linguam sibi aliquantum solvant,
> fiduciam loquendi firment.
>
> De Nominibus Dandis ad Conventiculum Participandum
>
> Ad Conventiculum Vasintoniense habendum coniungunt opus et
> vires Collegium Vallis Aqualbensis et Vniversitas Vasintoniae.
> Vt locum in Conventiculo petas mitte schedulam petitionis ad:
> Pam Kelley, Administrative Assistant, Liberal Arts and Sciences,
> Wenatchee Valley College, 1300 Fifth Street, Wenatchee, WA 98801.
>
> Hic ice ut schedulam petitionis depromas.
>
>
> De Deversoriis, Cibis, Pretiis, Talibusque Singulis
>
> Omnia talia singula per studiorum Vniversitatem Vasintoniae
> administrabuntur. Simulatque universitatis ministri condiciones
> omnino patefecerint, Conventiculum participaturos de omnibus
> singulis certiores faciemus necnon praeconium plenius et hoc
> loco statuemus et per cursum electronicum aliterque divulgabimus.
> Pretia autem haec fere fore videntur. Pro duplici conclavi
> solvet quisque cotidie 30 thaleros et pro cibis 15. Qui simplex
> conclave cupiet paulo plus impendet. Quae quidem pretia paulo
> maiora sunt quam quae vel Aquis Albis vel Lexintoniae solvere
> solent plerique; sed si ad pulcherrimam florentissimamque necnon
> et sumptuosiorem urbem Seattli atque etiam ad amoenissimum
> universitatis campum spectatur, talia pretia re vera modica
> apparent. Conventicula Vasintoniensia sunt videlicet multis
> non tantum discendi verum etiam dies feriatos iucundos agendi
> occasiones. Discipulos hortamur ut stipendia a Conventiculo
> petant, quae stidendia non solum ad deversandi ciborumque
> sumptus sed etiam ad excursionum pretia adhiberi poterunt.
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42483 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued VI Mart
Pompeia Minucia Strabo Consul Minor Tiberio Galerio Paulino Praetor Quiritibus Novae Romae S.P.D.

After an expanse of contemplation, review of the laws pertaining to Petitio Actio and adjunct legal issues, I must pronounce intercessio on the edict issued by Praetor Tiberius Galerius Paulinus, to wit, message # 42458 of the Mainlist Forum Nova Roma, and #856 of the Nova Roma-Announce List, the theme of which states that all Petitio Actio from now on MUST be sent to NR_cohors_Praetoria@yahoogroups.com, and that one may feel free if they wish to crosscopy the addresses of the Praetors as listed on the heading of the face page of the mainlist Yahoo! Groups website.

The rationale behind intercessio action is: No legal consequence may be assigned over and above established law as a result of the noncompliance re failure to use the address above in launching a Petitio Actio. The edictum issued by the Praetor lends the weighted implication of undefined consequence in his use of the word MUST to the citizenry, and this is in contradiction to established law, which does not assign use of a specific address as criteria for a lawful process of contacting the Praetors in these matters. To digress, such communication can be initiated on the mainlist for the Praetores attention and said Praetor is legally bound to honour it by law. Below is the criteria by which a Praetor may dismiss a petition:

Under the Lex Salicia Iudiciaraia http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-11-24-iii.html

Pars Prima: De Peitione Actionis

ii. A Praetor can dismiss a Petitio Actionis if and only if one of the following cases applies:

A. A Praetor has no competence in the issue. Example: a Praetor cannot mediate between two foreign parties, for his competence is limited to the citizens of Nova Roma

B. The parties are not sui iuris in Nova Roma. Example: a minor cannot play the part of an actor.

C. The claim is incongruent. Example: "Ticius must be expelled from Nova Roma because he is bearded" is an incongruent claim, for it is not supported by law, precedent or common sense.

Those are the only ways a Praetor may dismiss a petitio. And reasonably, he cannot claim he didn't receive it if it is advertised in the public fora he moderates. If such avenue of communication is used, it is quite legal.

To recap more fully: In no way can it be justified that the Praetor may assign any consequence to lawful entitlement on the technicality that the Actor did not approach the Praetors using only a preferred address of the Praetor, but rather used one of a few communication options presented to an Actor on either the main forum or the website, to wit, advertised addresses on the main fora website, and the address or the magistrates communication section of www.novaroma.org, where citizens are invited to contact the Praetores regarding legal issues. If one cannot elicit a response from the Praetors, the public fora for which said Praetor is moderator may be utilized and is to be lawfully respected. The Praetor may 'request', but he 'must' not imply a consequence/penalty to lawfully entitled proceedings for failure to comply to his preferences. So, one 'must' contract the Praetor to launch a petitio utilizing reasonable means, but just process of law cannot be restricted by him
to the use of one means of contacting him.
Moreover, the mandated address above will soon be buried in a sea of posts in the two fora of publication , making it a potential chore for anyone to access in the future.

I issue intercessio based on Constitutional Clause IV 2. Magistrates, where it states that Consuls may 'pronounce intercessio (intercession; a veto) against another consul or magistrate of lesser authority'. Further, the particulars on Intercessio other than that of a Tribunis Plebis may be referenced in the Lex Vedia de Ratione Edictorum

Issued VI Martias MMDCCLIX by my hand, in the Consulship of G. Fabius Buteo Modianus et Pompeia Minucia Strabo





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42484 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: THE CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR MARCH 3, 2006 (2759)
M. Hortensia Tribunis Quiritibusque spd;
No wonder I've heard nothing from the Prop. of America
Austrorientalis, he's been misplaced;-).

Please correct this error on the Senate agenda, and place Marcus
Vitellius Legus in the correct Province. And kindly do not prorogue
him- he is non-existant! I tried to get a group together for a
November meeting in S. Carolina, a big Legio meet-up and he did
nothing to further this.
M. Hortensia Maior, aedilis plebis
producer "Vox Romana" podcast
civis of Provincia America Austrorientalis

> Marcus Vitellius Legus: America Austroccidentalis
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42485 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: THE CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR MARCH 3, 2006 (2759)
SALVETE !

I have tried to contact him for the MM website promotion. No response. But I'm wondering what is happen with Vitellius Triarius ? He was very active last year and he is the provincial webmaster.

VALETE,
IVL SABINVS

Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:
M. Hortensia Tribunis Quiritibusque spd;
No wonder I've heard nothing from the Prop. of America
Austrorientalis, he's been misplaced;-).

Please correct this error on the Senate agenda, and place Marcus
Vitellius Legus in the correct Province. And kindly do not prorogue
him- he is non-existant! I tried to get a group together for a
November meeting in S. Carolina, a big Legio meet-up and he did
nothing to further this.
M. Hortensia Maior, aedilis plebis
producer "Vox Romana" podcast
civis of Provincia America Austrorientalis

> Marcus Vitellius Legus: America Austroccidentalis
>






SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------







NOVA ROMANI !
Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support page to your websites.
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm

"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42486 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor Petitio actionis
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Kirsteen Wright wrote:

> On 3/6/06, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus <dom.con.fus@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ah, Octavius, senator of the republic, model of civilty, language
>> correctness and of superior social behaviour and dignitas for all the
>> cives of Nova Roma...
>
>
> Isn't it lovely when one citizen so appreciates another?
>
> Merula
>
> Chaos, confusion, disorder - my work here is done

And a thourough job you seem to have made of it, judging by recent
exchanges.

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42487 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: THE CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR MARCH 3, 2006 (2759)
---Salvete Hortensia Maior et Omnes:

My apologies, and just to clarify, that's my goof, not that of
Seutonius Tribune; it seems I named the provincia incorrectly.
However, Vitellius Propraetor unfortunately did not submit his name
for proroguement as requested.

Valete
Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia Tribunis Quiritibusque spd;
> No wonder I've heard nothing from the Prop. of America
> Austrorientalis, he's been misplaced;-).
>
> Please correct this error on the Senate agenda, and place Marcus
> Vitellius Legus in the correct Province. And kindly do not
prorogue
> him- he is non-existant! I tried to get a group together for a
> November meeting in S. Carolina, a big Legio meet-up and he did
> nothing to further this.
> M. Hortensia Maior, aedilis plebis
> producer "Vox Romana" podcast
> civis of Provincia America Austrorientalis
>
> > Marcus Vitellius Legus: America Austroccidentalis
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42488 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
In a message dated 3/6/2006 3:08:27 PM Pacific Standard Time,
pompeia_minucia_tiberia@... writes:
After an expanse of contemplation, review of the laws pertaining to Petitio
Actio and adjunct legal issues, I must pronounce intercessio on the edict
issued by Praetor Tiberius Galerius Paulinus, to wit, message # 42458 of the
Mainlist Forum Nova Roma, and #856 of the Nova Roma-Announce List, the theme of
which states that all Petitio Actio from now on MUST be sent to
NR_cohors_Praetoria@yahoogroups.com, and that one may feel free if they wish to crosscopy the
addresses of the Praetors as listed on the heading of the face page of the
mainlist Yahoo! Groups website
Salvete
So, if I understand you correctly the action word MUST should be changed to
SHOULD. In this case petitions that you want acted on SHOULD be sent to the
address. Apparently Praetors have no choice about where they receive petitions,
unlike the circumstances in old Rome. Interesting.

Valete
Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42489 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
---Salve Q. Fabius Maximus Senator:

No, a Praetor should not under current circumstances restrict
contact to just one address in the entertainment of lawfully
entitled justice or inquiry, when there are a few publically
advertised addresses by which the citizenry, and the entire public
for that matter, are encouraged to contact the Praetores. The one
listed in the recent edict will doubtless be buried in a sea of
posts. Who is going to see it if they do not sub to the ML and
Announce List? I find it inappropriate that a citizen might
potentially use the longstanding publically advertised communication
avenue on the ML to discuss a legal concern like a petition, only to
potentially be met with a 'sorry, but you didn't use the right
addie'.

If there was only one advertised means of contacting a praetor, that
would be different...there are more than one.

I'm sorry you disapprove, but I nonetheless thank you for your
feedback.

Pompeia Minucia Strabo
Consul Minor


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 3/6/2006 3:08:27 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> pompeia_minucia_tiberia@... writes:
> After an expanse of contemplation, review of the laws pertaining
to Petitio
> Actio and adjunct legal issues, I must pronounce intercessio on
the edict
> issued by Praetor Tiberius Galerius Paulinus, to wit, message #
42458 of the
> Mainlist Forum Nova Roma, and #856 of the Nova Roma-Announce List,
the theme of
> which states that all Petitio Actio from now on MUST be sent to
> NR_cohors_Praetoria@yahoogroups.com, and that one may feel free if
they wish to crosscopy the
> addresses of the Praetors as listed on the heading of the face
page of the
> mainlist Yahoo! Groups website
> Salvete
> So, if I understand you correctly the action word MUST should be
changed to
> SHOULD. In this case petitions that you want acted on SHOULD be
sent to the
> address. Apparently Praetors have no choice about where they
receive petitions,
> unlike the circumstances in old Rome. Interesting.
>
> Valete
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42490 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Propraetor of America Austrorientalis
Salvete Quirites,

Consul Strabo gave his name as:

>> Marcus Vitellius Legus

There's a typo above. His cognomen is Ligus.

http://www.novaroma.org/bin/view?id=3759

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42491 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Karen Blackburn"
<Iulia-Vespasia@...> wrote:
>
> I am interested in purchasing the roman calendar but have not
managed to find your details. Could you please reply with an email
address/web page where I can order from. Many thanks.
> Ivlia Vespasia
>
>

Salve!

You can go to the wiki
http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/NovaRoma:Community_Portal and type
"calendar" in the search box, or you can follow the links to
"Macellum" and then "Ordo Equester Shops"

Optime vale

M. Lucretius Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42492 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Oh for petes sake Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum
Consul Pompeia Minucia Strabo

On Feb 20 you issued a call for candidates and stated flatly that

"-all- declarations of candidacy-must- be made in writing to
Consuls@... to be considered official."


"MUST BE MADE"...

How is what I did any different?

Consuls@... is not either Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com or
NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com which you have indicated would be
legal for a Petitio Actio to a Praetor but would not be "considered
official" for elections????


Can someone say double standard???

You seem to think this is a violation of The Lex Salicia
Iudiciaraia. But this lex only applies after a Praetor has
received a Petitio Actio. It does not apply before one is received.

I can not dismiss what I have not received.

If you wanted to act as Praetor you should not have resigned the
office I now hold.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetor



From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
Date: Mon Feb 20, 2006 2:49 pm
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE - CALL FOR CANDIDATES pompeia_minu...


EDICTUM CONSULARE - CALL FOR CANDIDATES EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM

Candidatures shall be entertained for the following magisterial
vacancy until
March 6 2400 Roma Time, 2006, to wit, the position of Editor
Commentariorum of
the Nova Roma periodical "Aquila", said editor to serve the
remainder of this
year. Although candidates for this position are encouraged to place
their
resumes before the populace via public fora, -all- declarations of
candidacy
-must- be made in writing to Consuls@... to be considered
official.






---
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42493 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
C. Equitius Cato P. Tiberiae Straboni Ti. Galerio Paulino Q. Fabio
Maximo quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Consul Strabo, an interesting correction to the rationale behind your
intercessio. It is not as simple a matter as you would present. You
quote the lex Salicia as follows:

"Pars Prima: De Peitione [sic] Actionis

ii. A Praetor can dismiss a Petitio Actionis if and only if one of
the following cases applies:

A. A Praetor has no competence in the issue. Example: a Praetor
cannot mediate between two foreign parties, for his competence is
limited to the citizens of Nova Roma

B. The parties are not sui iuris in Nova Roma. Example: a minor
cannot play the part of an actor.

C. The claim is incongruent. Example: 'Ticius must be expelled
from Nova Roma because he is bearded' is an incongruent claim, for it
is not supported by law, precedent or common sense.

Those are the only ways a Praetor may dismiss a petitio."

This is incorrect. If this were in fact the case, then Galerius
Paulinus could not have dismissed my petitio against your colleague,
Modianus. So, there must be other legal instruments by which a
praetor can dismiss a petitio. Modianus was spared action on my
petitio because of another law, the lex Equitia de Iurisdictione I.A.

Let us look carefully at the powers of the praetors in matters such as
this.


First, the praetors are given the authority:

"To issue those edicta (edicts) necessary to engage in those tasks
which advance the mission and function of Nova Roma and to administer
the law (such edicts being binding upon themselves as well as others)"
(lex Constitutiva VI.A.3.b)

They are also given imperium (lex Const. VI.A.3.a). Imperium carries
with it, under our law, potestas (lex Arminia Equitia de Imperio
II.A). Potestas in turn gives them:

"Ius coercendi minor, the power to compel obedience in the name of the
state, within the duties of the magistrate." (lex Arminia Equitia de
Imperio I.A)

So, according to our law, a praetor can, in fact, "compel" (which
carries with it the appropriateness of the word "must") citizens to
act in certain ways to adhere to the law within his duties. As one of
his primary duties is to administer the law, it follows logically that
a praetor can define the circumstances under which he will do so.

To put all of this in short form:

1. A praetor has the authority to administer the law --- an authority
*not* given to the consuls (lex Const.),
2. A praetor has imperium (lex Const.),
3. A praetor has potestas (lex Arminia &c.),
4. Potestas gives the praetor the authority to compel obedience
within his duties (lex Arminia &c.) --- which, as I've shown, includes
administering the law, and

therefore

5. A praetor has the authority to decide by what mechanisms he sees
fit to administer the law, and compel the citizens to obey those
mechanisms.

You certainly have the right to pronounce intercessio, but I do not
think that it is a correct interpretation of the law.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42494 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
C. Equitius Cato Ti. Galerio Paulino P. Tiberiae Straboni S.P.D.

Magistrati, you might also consider using the correct dating: it is
*either*

6 March A.D. 2006/2006 C.E.

*or*

pridie Nones Martias MMDCCLIX A.U.C.

not some odd hybrid of the two. I don't post the calendar (almost)
daily for nothing :-)

Valete bene,

Cato