Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Mar 6-13, 2006

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42494 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42495 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42496 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42497 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42498 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42499 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: Oh for petes sake Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42500 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42501 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: Oh for petes sake Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42502 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: Oh for petes sake Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42503 From: duy mai Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: CONVENTUS . . . almost . .Conventiculum.BoreoOccidentalis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42504 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: I hereby withdraw that edict
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42505 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: CONVENTUS . . . almost . .Conventiculum.BoreoOccidentalis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42506 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: CONVENTUS . . . almost . .Conventiculum.Boreoccidentalis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42507 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: CONVENTUS . . . almost . .Conventiculum.BoreoOccidentalis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42508 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42509 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Non. Mar.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42510 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: THE CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR MARCH 3, 2006 (2759)--The Propraeto
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42511 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Roman calendar of events
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42512 From: P.M. Albucius Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of praetor edict
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42513 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: THE CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR MARCH 3, 2006 (2759)--The Propr
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42514 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: Greetings and Salutations... Newbie alert
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42515 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Sabbatical
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42516 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: Sabbatical
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42517 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: CONVENTUS . . . almost . .Conventiculum.BoreoOccidentalis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42518 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: CONVENTUS . . . almost . .Conventiculum.Boreoccidentalis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42519 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Resignation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42520 From: daylily218 Date: 2006-03-08
Subject: Vivat Wheelock!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42521 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-08
Subject: Re: Vivat Wheelock!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42522 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-08
Subject: post. Non. Mar. (a.d. VIII Id. Mar.)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42523 From: darren_pile Date: 2006-03-08
Subject: Gods
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42524 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-03-08
Subject: Re: Gods
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42525 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-03-08
Subject: Re: Gods
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42526 From: Andy Gyll Date: 2006-03-08
Subject: Re: Gods
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42527 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-08
Subject: Re: Gods
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42528 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Absent
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42529 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Modern fiction set in Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42530 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42531 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Resignation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42532 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42533 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42534 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42535 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42536 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42537 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42538 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42539 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42540 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Let's be polite people
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42541 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Let's be polite people
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42542 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42543 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42544 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42545 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42546 From: Paul Jones Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Modern fiction set in Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42547 From: Steve Mesnick Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42548 From: Legion XXIV Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Legion XXIV Vicesima Quarta Newsletter March 2006
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42549 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42550 From: Stefanie Beer Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Modern fiction set in Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42551 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42552 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42553 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42554 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42555 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42556 From: muidopure Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42557 From: Lance Frizzell-Reynolds Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42558 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius GalerÂ…Â…Now OFF TOPIC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42559 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Modern fiction set in Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42560 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42561 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Nova Roma is not as bad as you think.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42562 From: Lance Frizzell-Reynolds Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42563 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42564 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Modern fiction set in Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42565 From: Rubrius Erasimus Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42566 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius GalerÂ…Â…Now BACK ON TOPIC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42567 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42568 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Unladen Swallows
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42569 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42570 From: Semiramis Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42571 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42572 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42573 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42574 From: Lance Frizzell-Reynolds Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: NewRoman List
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42575 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42576 From: Semiramis Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42577 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42578 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Romans and duels (Was ex officio etc)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42579 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42580 From: Elizabeth Price Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42581 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42582 From: rocknrockabilly Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Religio Romana and other Pagan links
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42583 From: duy mai Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: NewRoman List
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42584 From: Semiramis Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: On Effeminate and Degenerate Romans (was: Ex Officio Tiberius Gale
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42585 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42586 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: a.d. VI Id. Mar.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42587 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: a.d. VI Id. Mar.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42588 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Sodalitates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42589 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42590 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42591 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42592 From: Titus Marcius Felix Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Citizens of a republic or players of RPG
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42593 From: C·ARMINIVS·RECCANELLVS Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Citizens of a republic or players of RPG
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42594 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42595 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: CITIZENS OF A REPUBLIC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42596 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: De petitione: sundry comments
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42597 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42598 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: a.d. VI Id. Mar.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42599 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42600 From: druidfoot02 Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Neoplatonist Fellowship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42601 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42602 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: a.d. VI Id. Mar.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42603 From: Stefanie Beer Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TG
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42604 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42605 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42606 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Sodalitates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42607 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42608 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42609 From: Stefanie Beer Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: Citizens of a republic or players of RPG
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42610 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Teaching Children
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42611 From: Stefanie Beer Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Roman celebrities in Medicine
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42612 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Sodalitates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42613 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Sodalitates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42614 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Sodalitates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42615 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42616 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42617 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42618 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Teaching Children
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42619 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Sodalitates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42620 From: A C Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Teaching Children
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42621 From: A C Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: On Effeminate and Degenerate Romans (was: Ex Officio Tiberius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42622 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Sodalitates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42623 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Sodalitates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42624 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42625 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42626 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42627 From: Peter Bird Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Teaching Children
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42628 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42629 From: daylily218 Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Teaching Children Latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42630 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Sodalitates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42631 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: On Effeminate and Degenerate Romans (was: Ex Officio Tiberius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42632 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Sodalitates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42633 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42634 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42635 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42636 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42637 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: On Effeminate and Degenerate Romans (was: Ex Officio Tiberius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42638 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42639 From: StarVVreck Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Word file
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42640 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42641 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: a.d. VI Id. Mar.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42642 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: a.d. III Id. Mar.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42643 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42644 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42645 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: a.d. VI Id. Mar.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42646 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42647 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42648 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42649 From: daylily218 Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Minimus Vivat!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42650 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42651 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42652 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Off Topic News For Our British Citizens
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42653 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-03-12
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42654 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-12
Subject: a.d IV Id. Mar.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42655 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-12
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42656 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-12
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42657 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-12
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42658 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-03-12
Subject: Asking about the roman legions in Lusitania
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42659 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-03-12
Subject: Re: Asking about the roman legions in Lusitania
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42660 From: Marcus Horatius Date: 2006-03-12
Subject: Results of Senate Votes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42661 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2006-03-13
Subject: Re: NewRoman List
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42662 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-13
Subject: a.d. III Id. Mar. (the real one)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42663 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-03-13
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42664 From: Titus Marcius Felix Date: 2006-03-13
Subject: Re: Asking about the roman legions in Lusitania
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42665 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-13
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42666 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-13
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42667 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-03-13
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42668 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-13
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42669 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-13
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42494 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
C. Equitius Cato Ti. Galerio Paulino P. Tiberiae Straboni S.P.D.

Magistrati, you might also consider using the correct dating: it is
*either*

6 March A.D. 2006/2006 C.E.

*or*

pridie Nones Martias MMDCCLIX A.U.C.

not some odd hybrid of the two. I don't post the calendar (almost)
daily for nothing :-)

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42495 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
Salve Cato

It is also

the 7th day of March 2759 a.v.c which what I was using.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato Ti. Galerio Paulino P. Tiberiae Straboni S.P.D.
>
> Magistrati, you might also consider using the correct dating: it
is
> *either*
>
> 6 March A.D. 2006/2006 C.E.
>
> *or*
>
> pridie Nones Martias MMDCCLIX A.U.C.
>
> not some odd hybrid of the two. I don't post the calendar (almost)
> daily for nothing :-)
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42496 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
---Salve Equitius Cato:

Well, a petitio cannot be dismissed if there is congruency, having a
beard is an incongruency...things in the Lex Salicia Peonalis are
not incongruency. This all covered in Section C...so although you
are being somewhat more detailed....nobody can dismiss a petition
over what the Praetor may or may not regard as a legitimate claim
under the law. And so we agree on that on most counts.

Do you think I should withdraw the intercessio and istead issue an
edict stating that I shall pronounce intercessio on the dismissal of
any claim of petitio actio held back due to one's failure to use
this address.

??? I can.

Stranger things have happened in NR...rather beaurocratic and
creative reasons for not hearing a claim. And there is a
missing 'or else' to this edict by use of the word 'must', which is
undefined and lasts til the end of Galerius Praetor's term, and
frankly, I am uncomfortable with unknown consequences.

Why not Praetores@... for the Praetoral Edict , and have
this address also at the top of the mainlist website
facepage....that's a common address, and one advertised on the
website. It is not an addie that only people who will sub to either
the ML and Announce list will know about.

These are my concerns. When a 'real' problem strikes...well, then I
think people need access to legal avenues that are their due.

Vale
Pompeia Minucia Strabo


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato P. Tiberiae Straboni Ti. Galerio Paulino Q. Fabio
> Maximo quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> Consul Strabo, an interesting correction to the rationale behind
your
> intercessio. It is not as simple a matter as you would present.
You
> quote the lex Salicia as follows:
>
> "Pars Prima: De Peitione [sic] Actionis
>
> ii. A Praetor can dismiss a Petitio Actionis if and only if
one of
> the following cases applies:
>
> A. A Praetor has no competence in the issue. Example: a
Praetor
> cannot mediate between two foreign parties, for his competence is
> limited to the citizens of Nova Roma
>
> B. The parties are not sui iuris in Nova Roma. Example: a
minor
> cannot play the part of an actor.
>
> C. The claim is incongruent. Example: 'Ticius must be
expelled
> from Nova Roma because he is bearded' is an incongruent claim, for
it
> is not supported by law, precedent or common sense.
>
> Those are the only ways a Praetor may dismiss a petitio."
>
> This is incorrect. If this were in fact the case, then Galerius
> Paulinus could not have dismissed my petitio against your
colleague,
> Modianus. So, there must be other legal instruments by which a
> praetor can dismiss a petitio. Modianus was spared action on my
> petitio because of another law, the lex Equitia de Iurisdictione
I.A.
>
> Let us look carefully at the powers of the praetors in matters
such as
> this.
>
>
> First, the praetors are given the authority:
>
> "To issue those edicta (edicts) necessary to engage in those tasks
> which advance the mission and function of Nova Roma and to
administer
> the law (such edicts being binding upon themselves as well as
others)"
> (lex Constitutiva VI.A.3.b)
>
> They are also given imperium (lex Const. VI.A.3.a). Imperium
carries
> with it, under our law, potestas (lex Arminia Equitia de Imperio
> II.A). Potestas in turn gives them:
>
> "Ius coercendi minor, the power to compel obedience in the name of
the
> state, within the duties of the magistrate." (lex Arminia Equitia
de
> Imperio I.A)
>
> So, according to our law, a praetor can, in fact, "compel" (which
> carries with it the appropriateness of the word "must") citizens to
> act in certain ways to adhere to the law within his duties. As
one of
> his primary duties is to administer the law, it follows logically
that
> a praetor can define the circumstances under which he will do so.
>
> To put all of this in short form:
>
> 1. A praetor has the authority to administer the law --- an
authority
> *not* given to the consuls (lex Const.),
> 2. A praetor has imperium (lex Const.),
> 3. A praetor has potestas (lex Arminia &c.),
> 4. Potestas gives the praetor the authority to compel obedience
> within his duties (lex Arminia &c.) --- which, as I've shown,
includes
> administering the law, and
>
> therefore
>
> 5. A praetor has the authority to decide by what mechanisms he
sees
> fit to administer the law, and compel the citizens to obey those
> mechanisms.
>
> You certainly have the right to pronounce intercessio, but I do not
> think that it is a correct interpretation of the law.
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42497 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
---Picky Picky :>)

Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato Ti. Galerio Paulino P. Tiberiae Straboni S.P.D.
>
> Magistrati, you might also consider using the correct dating: it
is
> *either*
>
> 6 March A.D. 2006/2006 C.E.
>
> *or*
>
> pridie Nones Martias MMDCCLIX A.U.C.
>
> not some odd hybrid of the two. I don't post the calendar (almost)
> daily for nothing :-)
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42498 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-06
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
hey, it's really Nisan, 5767!
Maior



> ---Picky Picky :>)
>
> Pompeia
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@>
> wrote:
> >
> > C. Equitius Cato Ti. Galerio Paulino P. Tiberiae Straboni S.P.D.
> >
> > Magistrati, you might also consider using the correct dating:
it
> is
> > *either*
> >
> > 6 March A.D. 2006/2006 C.E.
> >
> > *or*
> >
> > pridie Nones Martias MMDCCLIX A.U.C.
> >
> > not some odd hybrid of the two. I don't post the calendar
(almost)
> > daily for nothing :-)
> >
> > Valete bene,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42499 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: Oh for petes sake Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum
---Salve Tiberius Galerius Praetor:


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Timothy P. Gallagher" <spqr753@...>
wrote:
>
> Consul Pompeia Minucia Strabo
>
> On Feb 20 you issued a call for candidates and stated flatly that
>
> "-all- declarations of candidacy-must- be made in writing to
> Consuls@... to be considered official."
>
>
> "MUST BE MADE"...
>
> How is what I did any different?

Pompeia: Yes, it is different. I assigned a consequence to the
word 'must'... it was 'to be considered official' (candidacies).

You have indicated that all claims of Petitio Actio 'must' be issued
to the address you gave in your edict....or what???
All theoretical legal stuff aside, and I know what you can and
cannot do as Praetor , I am stating that without a consequence
assigned to the word 'must' I dont' know what to expect if people
don't comply to your directive. If the answer to that is that the
petitio will not be heard, then this you may not do, as there is no
section allowing you within law to fail to hear a petition issued to
you through, say, Praetors@ nova roma. org, or by the personal
addresses of the Praetors on the front page of the mainlist. You can
certainly not refuse to hear a petition under Section C of the lex
Salicia, citing it as incongruent, like you could in the case of a
sitting magistrate,who cannot be prosecuted.

But I can drop the intercessio and issue an edict stating that
failure to use an obscurely published email address will not be
upheld by myself as Consul as a reason to dismiss a petition. Again,
such is not great enough grounds for dismissal of same, which is the
worst possible consequence I can think of to your unknown
qualification of the word 'must', and I am not confortable with it
herein, with respect to your imperium and your role as Praetor.

And I know you cannot dismiss what you have not received...but there
is little chance of your not receiving something intended for the
Praetores given the many addresses by which you can be contacted.
There is just little chance that people will be using the address
you have obligated them too....and they cannot be held to it.

How many times are you going to sideskirt talking about the issues
in the name of 'you resigned'?. Yes, yes... in 2002..remember it
well...how can I forget you remind me so often :>)...but it's hardly
an answer for everything, and that's hardly going to satisfy my
apprehensions regarding the matter at hand.

Pompeia
>
> Consuls@... is not either Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com or
> NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com which you have indicated would
be
> legal for a Petitio Actio to a Praetor but would not
be "considered
> official" for elections????
>
>
> Can someone say double standard???
>
> You seem to think this is a violation of The Lex Salicia
> Iudiciaraia. But this lex only applies after a Praetor has
> received a Petitio Actio. It does not apply before one is
received.
>
> I can not dismiss what I have not received.
>
> If you wanted to act as Praetor you should not have resigned the
> office I now hold.
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Praetor
>
>
>
> From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
> Date: Mon Feb 20, 2006 2:49 pm
> Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE - CALL FOR CANDIDATES pompeia_minu...
>
>
> EDICTUM CONSULARE - CALL FOR CANDIDATES EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM
>
> Candidatures shall be entertained for the following magisterial
> vacancy until
> March 6 2400 Roma Time, 2006, to wit, the position of Editor
> Commentariorum of
> the Nova Roma periodical "Aquila", said editor to serve the
> remainder of this
> year. Although candidates for this position are encouraged to
place
> their
> resumes before the populace via public fora, -all- declarations of
> candidacy
> -must- be made in writing to Consuls@... to be considered
> official.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42500 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
Salve Consul

"LEX SALICIA IVDICIARIA - PARS PRIMA: DE PETITIONE ACTIONIS
II. The actor must announce the action he is intending to exert to
one of the praetores ("editio actionis"), and then the actor must
ask the praetor to start the procedure ("petitio actionis")."

The law, which establishes judicial procedure in Nova Roma, requires
that the actor "announce the action" to one of the praetors. It does
not specify that publishing the action to the ML is sufficient. Does
publishing the action to the ML constitute announcing it to one of
the Praetors? A matter of interpretation I agree (and since it isn't
the Constitution we can take a stab at interpreting it), but the law
seems to require it be directed to at least one of the Praetors.
This seems to require specific contact, rather than indirect
contact.

I don't think that posting it to the ML would meet the requirement
for specifically announcing it to one or more of the Praetors. The
above section also requires the actor to ask the Praetor to start
the action. Again this implies to me a direct, rather than indirect,
communication with a Praetor

Thus if a citizen doesn't send his announcement direct to a Praetor,
I believe that the conditions required for commencing an action
would not have been fulfilled.

Since the LEX SALICIA IVDICIARIA, which establishes the judicial
process is, to me, worded in a way that requires a direct
communication between citizen and Praetor, it is entirely reasonable
and within the scope of a Praetor's duties to specify the email
address he requires that direct communication sent to, and it
certainly doesn't contradict the LEX SALICIA IVDICIARIA.

Finally while you can veto the Praetor's edict, you cannot
contradict (by virtue of your veto) the law, which of course as we
all should know now by virtue of Section II.B of the Constitution is
a higher legal authority. Your veto would appear to me to violate
the intent of the LEX SALICIA IVDICIARIA, an intent which the
Praetor's edict actually supported and enhanced.

Vale
Cn. Iulius Caesar


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> ---Salve Equitius Cato:
>
> Well, a petitio cannot be dismissed if there is congruency, having
a
> beard is an incongruency...things in the Lex Salicia Peonalis are
> not incongruency. This all covered in Section C...so although you
> are being somewhat more detailed....nobody can dismiss a petition
> over what the Praetor may or may not regard as a legitimate claim
> under the law. And so we agree on that on most counts.
>
> Do you think I should withdraw the intercessio and istead issue an
> edict stating that I shall pronounce intercessio on the dismissal
of
> any claim of petitio actio held back due to one's failure to use
> this address.
>
> ??? I can.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42501 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: Oh for petes sake Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Tiberio Galerio Paulino salutem dicit

If someone needs to contact me, as a Consul, they need not know my
e-mail address. They can go to the contacts section of the Nova Roma
website and issue an e-mail that will go to both consuls. This is
also true of the praetors. To say that this means (ie., via the
website) is not an acceptable means to contact the praetors seems to
be a waste of the e-mail forwarding system we have.

Not everyone checks the main list for edicts, and the website (the
last time I checked) was not being updated with the edicts issued.

Vale;

Modianus

On 3/6/06, Timothy P. Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
> Consul Pompeia Minucia Strabo
>
> On Feb 20 you issued a call for candidates and stated flatly that
>
> "-all- declarations of candidacy-must- be made in writing to
> Consuls@... to be considered official."
>
>
> "MUST BE MADE"...
>
> How is what I did any different?
>
> Consuls@... is not either Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com or
> NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com which you have indicated would be
> legal for a Petitio Actio to a Praetor but would not be "considered
> official" for elections????
>
>
> Can someone say double standard???
>
> You seem to think this is a violation of The Lex Salicia
> Iudiciaraia. But this lex only applies after a Praetor has
> received a Petitio Actio. It does not apply before one is received.
>
> I can not dismiss what I have not received.
>
> If you wanted to act as Praetor you should not have resigned the
> office I now hold.
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42502 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: Oh for petes sake Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum
Salve Consul Pompeia Minucia Tiberia

"How many times are you going to sideskirt talking about the issues
in the name of 'you resigned'?. Yes, yes... in 2002..remember it
well...how can I forget you remind me so often :>)...but it's hardly
an answer for everything, and that's hardly going to satisfy my
apprehensions regarding the matter at hand."

You can look it up but it is the FIRST time I, ME has ever refereed
to your resignation ( ok now twice)

But to the issue at hand

I issued an edict in furthance of an administrative portion of my
office. If I am not allowed to do even these things without second
guessing from on high what is the point of even holding the office?

The Senior Consul helped make sure emails would get throught to
the address and did not indicate there was anything wrong with my
wish that this is where they go.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> ---Salve Tiberius Galerius Praetor:
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Timothy P. Gallagher" <spqr753@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Consul Pompeia Minucia Strabo
> >
> > On Feb 20 you issued a call for candidates and stated flatly
that
> >
> > "-all- declarations of candidacy-must- be made in writing to
> > Consuls@ to be considered official."
> >
> >
> > "MUST BE MADE"...
> >
> > How is what I did any different?
>
> Pompeia: Yes, it is different. I assigned a consequence to the
> word 'must'... it was 'to be considered official' (candidacies).
>
> You have indicated that all claims of Petitio Actio 'must' be
issued
> to the address you gave in your edict....or what???
> All theoretical legal stuff aside, and I know what you can and
> cannot do as Praetor , I am stating that without a consequence
> assigned to the word 'must' I dont' know what to expect if people
> don't comply to your directive. If the answer to that is that the
> petitio will not be heard, then this you may not do, as there is
no
> section allowing you within law to fail to hear a petition issued
to
> you through, say, Praetors@ nova roma. org, or by the personal
> addresses of the Praetors on the front page of the mainlist. You
can
> certainly not refuse to hear a petition under Section C of the lex
> Salicia, citing it as incongruent, like you could in the case of a
> sitting magistrate,who cannot be prosecuted.
>
> But I can drop the intercessio and issue an edict stating that
> failure to use an obscurely published email address will not be
> upheld by myself as Consul as a reason to dismiss a petition.
Again,
> such is not great enough grounds for dismissal of same, which is
the
> worst possible consequence I can think of to your unknown
> qualification of the word 'must', and I am not confortable with it
> herein, with respect to your imperium and your role as Praetor.
>
> And I know you cannot dismiss what you have not received...but
there
> is little chance of your not receiving something intended for the
> Praetores given the many addresses by which you can be contacted.
> There is just little chance that people will be using the address
> you have obligated them too....and they cannot be held to it.
>
> How many times are you going to sideskirt talking about the issues
> in the name of 'you resigned'?. Yes, yes... in 2002..remember it
> well...how can I forget you remind me so often :>)...but it's
hardly
> an answer for everything, and that's hardly going to satisfy my
> apprehensions regarding the matter at hand.
>
> Pompeia
> >
> > Consuls@ is not either Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com or
> > NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com which you have indicated would
> be
> > legal for a Petitio Actio to a Praetor but would not
> be "considered
> > official" for elections????
> >
> >
> > Can someone say double standard???
> >
> > You seem to think this is a violation of The Lex Salicia
> > Iudiciaraia. But this lex only applies after a Praetor has
> > received a Petitio Actio. It does not apply before one is
> received.
> >
> > I can not dismiss what I have not received.
> >
> > If you wanted to act as Praetor you should not have resigned
the
> > office I now hold.
> >
> >
> > Vale
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > Praetor
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@>
> > Date: Mon Feb 20, 2006 2:49 pm
> > Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE - CALL FOR CANDIDATES
pompeia_minu...
> >
> >
> > EDICTUM CONSULARE - CALL FOR CANDIDATES EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM
> >
> > Candidatures shall be entertained for the following
magisterial
> > vacancy until
> > March 6 2400 Roma Time, 2006, to wit, the position of Editor
> > Commentariorum of
> > the Nova Roma periodical "Aquila", said editor to serve the
> > remainder of this
> > year. Although candidates for this position are encouraged to
> place
> > their
> > resumes before the populace via public fora, -all- declarations
of
> > candidacy
> > -must- be made in writing to Consuls@ to be considered
> > official.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42503 From: duy mai Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: CONVENTUS . . . almost . .Conventiculum.BoreoOccidentalis
sadly, i can't read the latin but would like to learn. perhaps, one fine day, i'll belong in the sodalitas latinitatis. thanks anyways.

"A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote: > Salue, interlocutor inscite, salve, G. Aurelia Falconis Siluana, et saluete,
> omnes!
>
> ATS: GAFS, mitte hanc ad Sodalitatem, amabo te.
>
> i'm definately interested but would like more info. however, the website link
> doesn't seem to work.
>
> ATS: Can you read the Latin? If so, you belong in the sodalitas
> Latinitatis! Please join us! The link is perhaps misspelled, with an extra
> l: it should be conventiculum. Try that. Boreo[o]ccidentalis may help, too.
>
> Valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
> "G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana" <silvanatextrix@...> wrote: G. Aurelia
> Falconis Silvana omnes SPD.
>
> Here's a feature from the website of BOREOOCDIDENTALIS, based
> out of Wenatchee Valley College in Washington State USA.
>
> Ruins-deprived North American Cives may be interested in
> supporting colleges and universities that put together such
> Conventicula. They are closer to home, and the organizing is
> already done.
>
> Valete bene in pace Deorum
>
> G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana
>
> Website: www.wenval.cc/boreooccidentales/boreo_latin/conventilculum.asp
>
> ==========================================================
> Seattli in Vniversitatis Vasintoniensis campo
> mense Iunio exeunte ineunteque mense Iulio anni MMVI.
>
> Sessiones praeparatoriae: diebus 23o et 24o mensis Iunii
>
> Conventiculum praecipuum: de die 25o usque per diem 1um m. Iulii
>
>
> Moderabuntur
>
> ▪Stephanus Berard, Ph.D., professor linguarum apud
> Studiorum Collegium Vallis Aqualbensis
>
> ▪Iacobus Dobreff, M.A., Gradus Doctoralis Candidatus apud
> Vniversitatem Lundiensem atque unus ex editoribus illius "Axel
> Oxenstierna Correspondence Project"
>
> ▪Akihiko Watanabe, Ph.D., magister praelectorque apud
> Facultatem Linguarum Modernarum et Classicarum Vniversitatis
> Vasintoniae Occidentalis.
>
> Aderunt et alii moderatores volubiliter Latine loqui valentes.
>
> Hoc Conventiculum optimam praebebit occasionem sermonem Latinum
> vivissimo modo exercitandi, nam singulis fere diebus excursiones
> didascalicas faciemus in quibus licebit participibus non solum
> sermones sponte conserere sed etiam omnia quae viderint
> fecerintque sermone Latino, adiuvantibus moderatoribus, fuse
> describere. Ruri et in hortis colloquemur de arboribus et
> plantis, montibus et molibus glacialibus, fluviis, bestiis,
> avibus, insectis, caelo aliisque multis. In urbe argumenta
> nostra erunt omnia urbana: artes omnes et oblectamenta,
> aedificia et vehicula, portus navesque, negotia, tabernae,
> libri, vestes, ludi athletici et ita porro. Imprimis placebit
> huiusmodi conventiculum eis quibus cordi sint variae amoenitates
> locorum (sive rusticorum sive urbanorum) quique ament amice
> garrientes variaque facientes modo "kinaesthetico" dicto linguae
> peritiam meliorem reddere.
>
> Quibus sit Idoneum Conventiculum
>
> Aeque invitantur et ludi magistri et praeceptores scholarum
> superiorum et professores, enixeque commendamus conventiculum
> hoc studiosis linguarum classicarum graduatis non tantum quod
> facultas Latine dicendi peritiam et legendi et scribendi mirum
> in modum corroborat verum etiam quod, ut Latinitas viva, quae
> nobis cordi est et ad quam nitimur, prorsus renascatur, imprimis
> necesse est ipsis futuris praeceptoribus linguam nostram pro
> instrumento omnino ad vivendum apto habere eamque ut omnibus
> demum rebus humanis, vel modernissimis, exprimendis parem
> tractent et doceant. Etiam eos qui fundamenta grammatica Latina
> didicerint Latineque iam satis bene legere valeant necdum tamen
> Latine colloqui possint ex animo cohortamur ut hoc conventiculum
> participent primosque suos sermones Latinos nobiscum serant. In
> conventiculis nostris colloquio Latino datis nullo modo est eis
> trepidandum erubescendumve qui nondum Latine locuti sint; nam nos fere
> omnes potius nuper quam pridem initium Latine loquendi fecimus,
> cuius initii difficultatem funditus comprehendimus.
>
>
>
> De Sessionibus Praeparatoriis
>
> Omnibus qui aliquot loquelae Latinae elementa generalia
> exercitare velint erit occasio paucis diebus ante conventiculum
> incohatum adveniendi ut diebus 23o et 24o mensis Iunii varias
> res familiariores una cum Stephano Berard et Iacobo Dobreff et
> forsan aliis moderatoribus Latino sermone celebrent, verba nova
> locutionesque utiles discant, linguam sibi aliquantum solvant,
> fiduciam loquendi firment.
>
> De Nominibus Dandis ad Conventiculum Participandum
>
> Ad Conventiculum Vasintoniense habendum coniungunt opus et
> vires Collegium Vallis Aqualbensis et Vniversitas Vasintoniae.
> Vt locum in Conventiculo petas mitte schedulam petitionis ad:
> Pam Kelley, Administrative Assistant, Liberal Arts and Sciences,
> Wenatchee Valley College, 1300 Fifth Street, Wenatchee, WA 98801.
>
> Hic ice ut schedulam petitionis depromas.
>
>
> De Deversoriis, Cibis, Pretiis, Talibusque Singulis
>
> Omnia talia singula per studiorum Vniversitatem Vasintoniae
> administrabuntur. Simulatque universitatis ministri condiciones
> omnino patefecerint, Conventiculum participaturos de omnibus
> singulis certiores faciemus necnon praeconium plenius et hoc
> loco statuemus et per cursum electronicum aliterque divulgabimus.
> Pretia autem haec fere fore videntur. Pro duplici conclavi
> solvet quisque cotidie 30 thaleros et pro cibis 15. Qui simplex
> conclave cupiet paulo plus impendet. Quae quidem pretia paulo
> maiora sunt quam quae vel Aquis Albis vel Lexintoniae solvere
> solent plerique; sed si ad pulcherrimam florentissimamque necnon
> et sumptuosiorem urbem Seattli atque etiam ad amoenissimum
> universitatis campum spectatur, talia pretia re vera modica
> apparent. Conventicula Vasintoniensia sunt videlicet multis
> non tantum discendi verum etiam dies feriatos iucundos agendi
> occasiones. Discipulos hortamur ut stipendia a Conventiculo
> petant, quae stidendia non solum ad deversandi ciborumque
> sumptus sed etiam ad excursionum pretia adhiberi poterunt.
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42504 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: I hereby withdraw that edict
Salve Romans

In the administration of justice I issued an edict that required
that any Petitio Actio in the future be sent to

NR_cohors_Praetoria@yahoogroups.com,

I hereby withdraw that edict.

I issued it because I was trying to fix a problem so that you,
the citizens of Nova Roma could sent a Petitio Actio to a place I
knew I would receive it and that there would be no delay in the
administration of justice.

Please feel free to send any Petitio Actionis to any e-mail
address that you think is appropriate.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42505 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: CONVENTUS . . . almost . .Conventiculum.BoreoOccidentalis
> Salue, o nameless writer, et saluete, omnes!
>
> sadly, i can't read the latin but would like to learn. perhaps, one fine day,
> i'll belong in the sodalitas latinitatis. thanks anyways.
>
> ATS: It¹s helpful to put a greeting and signature on all posts so that we
> know whom to address. Be that as it may, you and anyone who wants to learn
> Latin, or learn about Latin, and will not be disruptive, is welcome in the
> Sodalitas Latinitatis. We have everyone from rank beginners to world-class
> Latinists along with everything in between. We now have a new system in which
> members are loosely ranked so that their Latin can be improved by working with
> those of similar ability, and so that those whose abilities are the highest
> can assist the magistrates when needed.
>
> The post below was sent by one of my students in the Academia Thules,
> which conducts classes in Latin and other subjects free of charge. We will
> begin new courses in the Fall; there are two methods being used in the
> Academia, and you may also find one of the classes to your liking‹with the
> warning that both methods require a large investment of time which some may
> find difficult to manage.
>
> Incidentally, the post below deals with meetings for the purpose of
> practicing spoken Latin with one of the best known advocates of living Latin‹I
> wouldn¹t say it¹s for beginners, or even intermediate students, but for more
> advanced Latinists, it sounds wonderful.
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
> "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote: > Salue, interlocutor
> inscite, salve, G. Aurelia Falconis Siluana, et saluete,
>> > omnes!
>> >
>> > ATS: GAFS, mitte hanc ad Sodalitatem, amabo te.
>> >
>> > i'm definately interested but would like more info. however, the website
>> link
>> > doesn't seem to work.
>> >
>> > ATS: Can you read the Latin? If so, you belong in the sodalitas
>> > Latinitatis! Please join us! The link is perhaps misspelled, with an
>> extra
>> > l: it should be conventiculum. Try that. Boreo[o]ccidentalis may help,
>> too.
>> >
>> > Valete,
>> >
>> > A. Tullia Scholastica
>> >
>> >
>> > "G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana" <silvanatextrix@...> wrote: G. Aurelia
>> > Falconis Silvana omnes SPD.
>> >
>> > Here's a feature from the website of BOREOOCDIDENTALIS, based
>> > out of Wenatchee Valley College in Washington State USA.
>> >
>> > Ruins-deprived North American Cives may be interested in
>> > supporting colleges and universities that put together such
>> > Conventicula. They are closer to home, and the organizing is
>> > already done.
>> >
>> > Valete bene in pace Deorum
>> >
>> > G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana
>> >
>> > Website: www.wenval.cc/boreooccidentales/boreo_latin/conventilculum.asp
>> >
>> > ==========================================================
>> > Seattli in Vniversitatis Vasintoniensis campo
>> > mense Iunio exeunte ineunteque mense Iulio anni MMVI.
>> >
>> > Sessiones praeparatoriae: diebus 23o et 24o mensis Iunii
>> >
>> > Conventiculum praecipuum: de die 25o usque per diem 1um m. Iulii
>> >
>> >
>> > Moderabuntur
>> >
>> > ▪Stephanus Berard, Ph.D., professor linguarum apud
>> > Studiorum Collegium Vallis Aqualbensis
>> >
>> > ▪Iacobus Dobreff, M.A., Gradus Doctoralis Candidatus apud
>> > Vniversitatem Lundiensem atque unus ex editoribus illius "Axel
>> > Oxenstierna Correspondence Project"
>> >
>> > ▪Akihiko Watanabe, Ph.D., magister praelectorque apud
>> > Facultatem Linguarum Modernarum et Classicarum Vniversitatis
>> > Vasintoniae Occidentalis.
>> >
>> > Aderunt et alii moderatores volubiliter Latine loqui valentes.
>> >
>> > Hoc Conventiculum optimam praebebit occasionem sermonem Latinum
>> > vivissimo modo exercitandi, nam singulis fere diebus excursiones
>> > didascalicas faciemus in quibus licebit participibus non solum
>> > sermones sponte conserere sed etiam omnia quae viderint
>> > fecerintque sermone Latino, adiuvantibus moderatoribus, fuse
>> > describere. Ruri et in hortis colloquemur de arboribus et
>> > plantis, montibus et molibus glacialibus, fluviis, bestiis,
>> > avibus, insectis, caelo aliisque multis. In urbe argumenta
>> > nostra erunt omnia urbana: artes omnes et oblectamenta,
>> > aedificia et vehicula, portus navesque, negotia, tabernae,
>> > libri, vestes, ludi athletici et ita porro. Imprimis placebit
>> > huiusmodi conventiculum eis quibus cordi sint variae amoenitates
>> > locorum (sive rusticorum sive urbanorum) quique ament amice
>> > garrientes variaque facientes modo "kinaesthetico" dicto linguae
>> > peritiam meliorem reddere.
>> >
>> > Quibus sit Idoneum Conventiculum
>> >
>> > Aeque invitantur et ludi magistri et praeceptores scholarum
>> > superiorum et professores, enixeque commendamus conventiculum
>> > hoc studiosis linguarum classicarum graduatis non tantum quod
>> > facultas Latine dicendi peritiam et legendi et scribendi mirum
>> > in modum corroborat verum etiam quod, ut Latinitas viva, quae
>> > nobis cordi est et ad quam nitimur, prorsus renascatur, imprimis
>> > necesse est ipsis futuris praeceptoribus linguam nostram pro
>> > instrumento omnino ad vivendum apto habere eamque ut omnibus
>> > demum rebus humanis, vel modernissimis, exprimendis parem
>> > tractent et doceant. Etiam eos qui fundamenta grammatica Latina
>> > didicerint Latineque iam satis bene legere valeant necdum tamen
>> > Latine colloqui possint ex animo cohortamur ut hoc conventiculum
>> > participent primosque suos sermones Latinos nobiscum serant. In
>> > conventiculis nostris colloquio Latino datis nullo modo est eis
>> > trepidandum erubescendumve qui nondum Latine locuti sint; nam nos fere
>> > omnes potius nuper quam pridem initium Latine loquendi fecimus,
>> > cuius initii difficultatem funditus comprehendimus.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > De Sessionibus Praeparatoriis
>> >
>> > Omnibus qui aliquot loquelae Latinae elementa generalia
>> > exercitare velint erit occasio paucis diebus ante conventiculum
>> > incohatum adveniendi ut diebus 23o et 24o mensis Iunii varias
>> > res familiariores una cum Stephano Berard et Iacobo Dobreff et
>> > forsan aliis moderatoribus Latino sermone celebrent, verba nova
>> > locutionesque utiles discant, linguam sibi aliquantum solvant,
>> > fiduciam loquendi firment.
>> >
>> > De Nominibus Dandis ad Conventiculum Participandum
>> >
>> > Ad Conventiculum Vasintoniense habendum coniungunt opus et
>> > vires Collegium Vallis Aqualbensis et Vniversitas Vasintoniae.
>> > Vt locum in Conventiculo petas mitte schedulam petitionis ad:
>> > Pam Kelley, Administrative Assistant, Liberal Arts and Sciences,
>> > Wenatchee Valley College, 1300 Fifth Street, Wenatchee, WA 98801.
>> >
>> > Hic ice ut schedulam petitionis depromas.
>> >
>> >
>> > De Deversoriis, Cibis, Pretiis, Talibusque Singulis
>> >
>> > Omnia talia singula per studiorum Vniversitatem Vasintoniae
>> > administrabuntur. Simulatque universitatis ministri condiciones
>> > omnino patefecerint, Conventiculum participaturos de omnibus
>> > singulis certiores faciemus necnon praeconium plenius et hoc
>> > loco statuemus et per cursum electronicum aliterque divulgabimus.
>> > Pretia autem haec fere fore videntur. Pro duplici conclavi
>> > solvet quisque cotidie 30 thaleros et pro cibis 15. Qui simplex
>> > conclave cupiet paulo plus impendet. Quae quidem pretia paulo
>> > maiora sunt quam quae vel Aquis Albis vel Lexintoniae solvere
>> > solent plerique; sed si ad pulcherrimam florentissimamque necnon
>> > et sumptuosiorem urbem Seattli atque etiam ad amoenissimum
>> > universitatis campum spectatur, talia pretia re vera modica
>> > apparent. Conventicula Vasintoniensia sunt videlicet multis
>> > non tantum discendi verum etiam dies feriatos iucundos agendi
>> > occasiones. Discipulos hortamur ut stipendia a Conventiculo
>> > petant, quae stidendia non solum ad deversandi ciborumque
>> > sumptus sed etiam ad excursionum pretia adhiberi poterunt.
>> >
>> >
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42506 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: CONVENTUS . . . almost . .Conventiculum.Boreoccidentalis
G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Duy Mai, A. Tulliae Scholasticae
omnibusque SPD.

Yea, verily, there were typos. Woe unto they who type in the
wee hours of the morn. Cubitum abire debemus.

Website CORRECTED MARCH 7
www.wenval.cc/boreoccidentales/boreo_latin/conventiculum.asp

If I have again messed up, Google: Circulus Latinus Seattlensis.
The top item on the google hit list should be "Boreoccidentales"

I was also thrown by the single "o" between Boreo and Occidentales.
My apologies. I am forwarding the entire original post, as it is
now a long ways back in the messages.

Valete bene in pace Deorum

G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana"
<silvanatextrix@...> wrote:
>
> G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana omnes SPD.
>
> Here's a feature from the website of *BOREOCCIDENTALES*, based
> out of Wenatchee Valley College in Washington State USA.
>
> Ruins-deprived North American Cives may be interested in
> supporting colleges and universities that put together such
> Conventicula. They are closer to home, and the organizing is
> already done.
>
> Valete bene in pace Deorum
>
> G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana
>
> Website CORRECTED MARCH 7
www.wenval.cc/boreoccidentales/boreo_latin/conventiculum.asp
>
> ==========================================================
> Seattli in Vniversitatis Vasintoniensis campo
> mense Iunio exeunte ineunteque mense Iulio anni MMVI.
>
> Sessiones praeparatoriae: diebus 23o et 24o mensis Iunii
>
> Conventiculum praecipuum: de die 25o usque per diem 1um m. Iulii
>
>
> Moderabuntur
>
> ▪Stephanus Berard, Ph.D., professor linguarum apud
> Studiorum Collegium Vallis Aqualbensis
>
> ▪Iacobus Dobreff, M.A., Gradus Doctoralis Candidatus apud
> Vniversitatem Lundiensem atque unus ex editoribus illius "Axel
> Oxenstierna Correspondence Project"
>
> ▪Akihiko Watanabe, Ph.D., magister praelectorque apud
> Facultatem Linguarum Modernarum et Classicarum Vniversitatis
> Vasintoniae Occidentalis.
>
> Aderunt et alii moderatores volubiliter Latine loqui valentes.
>
> Hoc Conventiculum optimam praebebit occasionem sermonem Latinum
> vivissimo modo exercitandi, nam singulis fere diebus excursiones
> didascalicas faciemus in quibus licebit participibus non solum
> sermones sponte conserere sed etiam omnia quae viderint
> fecerintque sermone Latino, adiuvantibus moderatoribus, fuse
> describere. Ruri et in hortis colloquemur de arboribus et
> plantis, montibus et molibus glacialibus, fluviis, bestiis,
> avibus, insectis, caelo aliisque multis. In urbe argumenta
> nostra erunt omnia urbana: artes omnes et oblectamenta,
> aedificia et vehicula, portus navesque, negotia, tabernae,
> libri, vestes, ludi athletici et ita porro. Imprimis placebit
> huiusmodi conventiculum eis quibus cordi sint variae amoenitates
> locorum (sive rusticorum sive urbanorum) quique ament amice
> garrientes variaque facientes modo "kinaesthetico" dicto linguae
> peritiam meliorem reddere.
>
> Quibus sit Idoneum Conventiculum
>
> Aeque invitantur et ludi magistri et praeceptores scholarum
> superiorum et professores, enixeque commendamus conventiculum
> hoc studiosis linguarum classicarum graduatis non tantum quod
> facultas Latine dicendi peritiam et legendi et scribendi mirum
> in modum corroborat verum etiam quod, ut Latinitas viva, quae
> nobis cordi est et ad quam nitimur, prorsus renascatur, imprimis
> necesse est ipsis futuris praeceptoribus linguam nostram pro
> instrumento omnino ad vivendum apto habere eamque ut omnibus
> demum rebus humanis, vel modernissimis, exprimendis parem
> tractent et doceant. Etiam eos qui fundamenta grammatica Latina
> didicerint Latineque iam satis bene legere valeant necdum tamen
> Latine colloqui possint ex animo cohortamur ut hoc conventiculum
> participent primosque suos sermones Latinos nobiscum serant. In
> conventiculis nostris colloquio Latino datis nullo modo est eis
> trepidandum erubescendumve qui nondum Latine locuti sint; nam nos fere
> omnes potius nuper quam pridem initium Latine loquendi fecimus,
> cuius initii difficultatem funditus comprehendimus.
>
>
>
> De Sessionibus Praeparatoriis
>
> Omnibus qui aliquot loquelae Latinae elementa generalia
> exercitare velint erit occasio paucis diebus ante conventiculum
> incohatum adveniendi ut diebus 23o et 24o mensis Iunii varias
> res familiariores una cum Stephano Berard et Iacobo Dobreff et
> forsan aliis moderatoribus Latino sermone celebrent, verba nova
> locutionesque utiles discant, linguam sibi aliquantum solvant,
> fiduciam loquendi firment.
>
> De Nominibus Dandis ad Conventiculum Participandum
>
> Ad Conventiculum Vasintoniense habendum coniungunt opus et
> vires Collegium Vallis Aqualbensis et Vniversitas Vasintoniae.
> Vt locum in Conventiculo petas mitte schedulam petitionis ad:
> Pam Kelley, Administrative Assistant, Liberal Arts and Sciences,
> Wenatchee Valley College, 1300 Fifth Street, Wenatchee, WA 98801.
>
> Hic ice ut schedulam petitionis depromas.
>
>
> De Deversoriis, Cibis, Pretiis, Talibusque Singulis
>
> Omnia talia singula per studiorum Vniversitatem Vasintoniae
> administrabuntur. Simulatque universitatis ministri condiciones
> omnino patefecerint, Conventiculum participaturos de omnibus
> singulis certiores faciemus necnon praeconium plenius et hoc
> loco statuemus et per cursum electronicum aliterque divulgabimus.
> Pretia autem haec fere fore videntur. Pro duplici conclavi
> solvet quisque cotidie 30 thaleros et pro cibis 15. Qui simplex
> conclave cupiet paulo plus impendet. Quae quidem pretia paulo
> maiora sunt quam quae vel Aquis Albis vel Lexintoniae solvere
> solent plerique; sed si ad pulcherrimam florentissimamque necnon
> et sumptuosiorem urbem Seattli atque etiam ad amoenissimum
> universitatis campum spectatur, talia pretia re vera modica
> apparent. Conventicula Vasintoniensia sunt videlicet multis
> non tantum discendi verum etiam dies feriatos iucundos agendi
> occasiones. Discipulos hortamur ut stipendia a Conventiculo
> petant, quae stidendia non solum ad deversandi ciborumque
> sumptus sed etiam ad excursionum pretia adhiberi poterunt.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42507 From: Phil Perez Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: CONVENTUS . . . almost . .Conventiculum.BoreoOccidentalis
Salve A. T. Scholastica,

Wow, I read it - amazing !!!

Vale,
Marcus Cassius Philippus
----- Original Message -----
From: A. Tullia Scholastica
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] CONVENTUS . . . almost . .Conventiculum.BoreoOccidentalis


> Salue, interlocutor inscite, salve, G. Aurelia Falconis Siluana, et saluete,
> omnes!
>
> ATS: GAFS, mitte hanc ad Sodalitatem, amabo te.
>
> i'm definately interested but would like more info. however, the website link
> doesn't seem to work.
>
> ATS: Can you read the Latin? If so, you belong in the sodalitas
> Latinitatis! Please join us! The link is perhaps misspelled, with an extra
> l: it should be conventiculum. Try that. Boreo[o]ccidentalis may help, too.
>
> Valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
> "G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana" <silvanatextrix@...> wrote: G. Aurelia
> Falconis Silvana omnes SPD.
>
> Here's a feature from the website of BOREOOCDIDENTALIS, based
> out of Wenatchee Valley College in Washington State USA.
>
> Ruins-deprived North American Cives may be interested in
> supporting colleges and universities that put together such
> Conventicula. They are closer to home, and the organizing is
> already done.
>
> Valete bene in pace Deorum
>
> G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana
>
> Website: www.wenval.cc/boreooccidentales/boreo_latin/conventilculum.asp
>
> ==========================================================
> Seattli in Vniversitatis Vasintoniensis campo
> mense Iunio exeunte ineunteque mense Iulio anni MMVI.
>
> Sessiones praeparatoriae: diebus 23o et 24o mensis Iunii
>
> Conventiculum praecipuum: de die 25o usque per diem 1um m. Iulii
>
>
> Moderabuntur
>
> ▪Stephanus Berard, Ph.D., professor linguarum apud
> Studiorum Collegium Vallis Aqualbensis
>
> ▪Iacobus Dobreff, M.A., Gradus Doctoralis Candidatus apud
> Vniversitatem Lundiensem atque unus ex editoribus illius "Axel
> Oxenstierna Correspondence Project"
>
> ▪Akihiko Watanabe, Ph.D., magister praelectorque apud
> Facultatem Linguarum Modernarum et Classicarum Vniversitatis
> Vasintoniae Occidentalis.
>
> Aderunt et alii moderatores volubiliter Latine loqui valentes.
>
> Hoc Conventiculum optimam praebebit occasionem sermonem Latinum
> vivissimo modo exercitandi, nam singulis fere diebus excursiones
> didascalicas faciemus in quibus licebit participibus non solum
> sermones sponte conserere sed etiam omnia quae viderint
> fecerintque sermone Latino, adiuvantibus moderatoribus, fuse
> describere. Ruri et in hortis colloquemur de arboribus et
> plantis, montibus et molibus glacialibus, fluviis, bestiis,
> avibus, insectis, caelo aliisque multis. In urbe argumenta
> nostra erunt omnia urbana: artes omnes et oblectamenta,
> aedificia et vehicula, portus navesque, negotia, tabernae,
> libri, vestes, ludi athletici et ita porro. Imprimis placebit
> huiusmodi conventiculum eis quibus cordi sint variae amoenitates
> locorum (sive rusticorum sive urbanorum) quique ament amice
> garrientes variaque facientes modo "kinaesthetico" dicto linguae
> peritiam meliorem reddere.
>
> Quibus sit Idoneum Conventiculum
>
> Aeque invitantur et ludi magistri et praeceptores scholarum
> superiorum et professores, enixeque commendamus conventiculum
> hoc studiosis linguarum classicarum graduatis non tantum quod
> facultas Latine dicendi peritiam et legendi et scribendi mirum
> in modum corroborat verum etiam quod, ut Latinitas viva, quae
> nobis cordi est et ad quam nitimur, prorsus renascatur, imprimis
> necesse est ipsis futuris praeceptoribus linguam nostram pro
> instrumento omnino ad vivendum apto habere eamque ut omnibus
> demum rebus humanis, vel modernissimis, exprimendis parem
> tractent et doceant. Etiam eos qui fundamenta grammatica Latina
> didicerint Latineque iam satis bene legere valeant necdum tamen
> Latine colloqui possint ex animo cohortamur ut hoc conventiculum
> participent primosque suos sermones Latinos nobiscum serant. In
> conventiculis nostris colloquio Latino datis nullo modo est eis
> trepidandum erubescendumve qui nondum Latine locuti sint; nam nos fere
> omnes potius nuper quam pridem initium Latine loquendi fecimus,
> cuius initii difficultatem funditus comprehendimus.
>
>
>
> De Sessionibus Praeparatoriis
>
> Omnibus qui aliquot loquelae Latinae elementa generalia
> exercitare velint erit occasio paucis diebus ante conventiculum
> incohatum adveniendi ut diebus 23o et 24o mensis Iunii varias
> res familiariores una cum Stephano Berard et Iacobo Dobreff et
> forsan aliis moderatoribus Latino sermone celebrent, verba nova
> locutionesque utiles discant, linguam sibi aliquantum solvant,
> fiduciam loquendi firment.
>
> De Nominibus Dandis ad Conventiculum Participandum
>
> Ad Conventiculum Vasintoniense habendum coniungunt opus et
> vires Collegium Vallis Aqualbensis et Vniversitas Vasintoniae.
> Vt locum in Conventiculo petas mitte schedulam petitionis ad:
> Pam Kelley, Administrative Assistant, Liberal Arts and Sciences,
> Wenatchee Valley College, 1300 Fifth Street, Wenatchee, WA 98801.
>
> Hic ice ut schedulam petitionis depromas.
>
>
> De Deversoriis, Cibis, Pretiis, Talibusque Singulis
>
> Omnia talia singula per studiorum Vniversitatem Vasintoniae
> administrabuntur. Simulatque universitatis ministri condiciones
> omnino patefecerint, Conventiculum participaturos de omnibus
> singulis certiores faciemus necnon praeconium plenius et hoc
> loco statuemus et per cursum electronicum aliterque divulgabimus.
> Pretia autem haec fere fore videntur. Pro duplici conclavi
> solvet quisque cotidie 30 thaleros et pro cibis 15. Qui simplex
> conclave cupiet paulo plus impendet. Quae quidem pretia paulo
> maiora sunt quam quae vel Aquis Albis vel Lexintoniae solvere
> solent plerique; sed si ad pulcherrimam florentissimamque necnon
> et sumptuosiorem urbem Seattli atque etiam ad amoenissimum
> universitatis campum spectatur, talia pretia re vera modica
> apparent. Conventicula Vasintoniensia sunt videlicet multis
> non tantum discendi verum etiam dies feriatos iucundos agendi
> occasiones. Discipulos hortamur ut stipendia a Conventiculo
> petant, quae stidendia non solum ad deversandi ciborumque
> sumptus sed etiam ad excursionum pretia adhiberi poterunt.
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
Fall of the roman empire The roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42508 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of Edictum Praetorum Issued V...
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

Regardless of the legal niceties (yes, I really did
say that!), I have to say that this is an example of a
basic failure on the part of both this year's consules
to recognize or respect the autonomy of other
magistrates and constitutional bodies. They seem to
regard themselves as the chief executives and all
other magistrates and bodies as their subordinates
whom they can overrule or interfere with at their
pleasure. This is a basic misunderstanding of the
nature of the Roman constitution.

Each elected magistrate is autonomous and answers
directly and exclusively to the populus (or, in the
case of the tribunes and plebejan aediles, to the
plebs). The praetores do not answer to the consules,
and although the consules may in some cases have the
power to overrule them they should do so only with
considerable caution. For a consul to overrule a
praetor in an area which is at the core of the
praetores' traditional constitutional role - the
administration of justice - is extremely irregular and
inappropriate except in extreme circumstances. It
shows a total disregard for constitutional propriety
and for the position of the praetor as the direct
servant of the populus.

I need not mention other recent examples; they will be
fresh in people's minds. I urge the consules to give
very careful thought to the proper role of a consul in
the constitutional system and to stop their policy of
interfering in matters which are outside their proper
and traditional jurisdiction. If they have concerns
about the way other magistrates and constitutional
bodies are doing their jobs, they should try to
persuade before trying to overrule, and if persuasion
fails they should submit their disputes to the senate.



___________________________________________________________
Win a BlackBerry device from O2 with Yahoo!. Enter now. http://www.yahoo.co.uk/blackberry
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42509 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Non. Mar.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est Nonis Martiis; haec dies fastus est.

"The Nones of March are free of meetings, because it's thought
The temple of Veiovis was consecrated today before the two groves.
When Romulus ringed his grove with a high stone wall,
He said: `Whoever takes refuge here, they will be safe.'
O from how tenuous a beginning the Romans sprang!
How little that crowd of old are to be envied!
But so the strange name won't confuse you, unknowingly,
Learn who this god is, and why he is so called.
He is the young Jupiter: see his youthful face:
Then see his hand, holding no lightening bolt.
Jove carried his lightning bolts after the Giants dared
Their attempt on the heavens: at first he was unarmed.
Ossa blazed with his new fires, and Pelion higher than Ossa,
And Olympus rooted to the solid earth.
A she-goat stands there too: they say the Cretan nymphs
Nursed the god: and she gave her milk to the infant Jove.
Now I'm called on to explain the name. Farmers call
Stunted grain vegrandia, and what's feeble vesca.
If that's the meaning, why should I not suspect
That the shrine of Veiovis is that of Little Jupiter?
Now when the stars glitter in the dark-blue sky,
Look up: you'll see the head of Gorgonian Pegasus.
It's said he leapt from the fecund neck of dead Medusa,
His mane drenched with her blood.
As he glided above the clouds, beneath the stars,
The sky was his earth, wings acted instead of feet,
And soon he champed indignantly on the fresh bit,
So that his light hoof created Helicon's Aonian spring.
Now he enjoys the sky, that his wings once sought,
And glitters there brightly with his fifteen stars." - Ovid, Fasti III

"Secondly, finding that many of the cities in Italy were very badly
governed, both by tyrannies and by oligarchies, he undertook to
welcome and attract to himself the fugitives from these cities, who
were very numerous, paying no regard either to their calamities or to
their fortunes, provided only they were free men. His purpose was to
increase the power of the Romans and to lessen that of their
neighbours; but he invented a specious pretext for his course, making
it appear that he was showing honour to a god. For he consecrated the
place between the Capitol and the citadel which is now called in the
language of the Romans "the space between the two groves," — a term
that was really descriptive at that time of the actual conditions, as
the place was shaded by thick woods on both sides where it joined the
hills, — and made it an asylum for suppliants. And built a temple
there, — but to what god or divinity he dedicated it I cannot say for
certain, — he engaged, under the colour of religion, to protect those
who fled to it from suffering any harm at the hands of their enemies;
and if they chose to remain with him, he promised them citizenship and
a share of the land he should take from the enemy. And people came
flocking thither from all parts, fleeing from their calamities at
home; nor had they afterwards any thought of removing to any other
place, but were held there by daily instances of his sociability and
kindness." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus 1.15.1-4

"Meantime the City was growing by the extension of its walls in
various directions an increase due rather to the anticipation of its
future population than to any present overcrowding. His next care was
to secure an addition to the population that the size of the City
might not be a source of weakness. It had been the ancient policy of
the founders of cities to get together a multitude of people of
obscure and low origin and then to spread the fiction that they were
the children of the soil. In accordance with this policy, Romulus
opened a place of refuge on the spot where, as you go down from the
Capitol, you find an enclosed space between two groves. A promiscuous
crowd of freemen and slaves, eager for change, fled thither from the
neighbouring states. This was the first accession of strength to the
nascent greatness of the city." - Livy, History of Rome 1.7

Veiovis (Vediovis) is one of the oldest of the Roman gods. He is a god
of healing, and was later associated with the Greek Asclepius. He was
mostly worshipped in Rome and Bovillae in Latium. On the Capitoline
Hill and on the Tiber Island temples were erected in his honor. In
spring, goats were sacrificed to avert plagues. Veiovis is portrayed
as a young man, holding a bunch of arrows (or lightning bolts) in his
hand, and is accompanied by a goat. He is probably based on the
Etruscan god Veive.

The Temple of Veiovis was only brought to light in 1939, during the
excavation underneath Piazza del Campidoglio for the creation of the
Gallery Junction. The parts of the building which make up the Palazzo
Senatorio are superimposed both over the temple and over the nearby
Tabularium, thereby managing to obscure the Roman building almost
completely and as a result saving it from destruction.

According to ancient sources, and based on the discovery, in the area
of the cella, of a marble statue used for religious purposes, it has
been possible to identify the divinity to whom this temple was
dedicated: Veiovis, the youthful God of the underworld who was the
ancient Italic version of Jupiter. Latin authors define its position
as being "inter duos lucos", that is to say between two sacred woods
situated on the two heights of the Capitoline Hill. In the same area
was also situated the Asylum, where, legend has it, Romulus extended
hospitality to fugitives from other parts of the Latium region, in
order to populate the new city which he founded.

Consecrated in 196 B.C. by Consul Lucius Furius Purpurio in the Battle
of Cremona during the war against the Boii Gauls, the temple was then
dedicated in 192 B.C. by Quintus Marcius Ralla.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Livy, Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Veiovis
(http://www.pantheon.org/articles/v/veiovis.html), Temple of Veiovis
(http://www.museicapitolini.org/en/museo/sezioni.asp?l1=5&l2=5)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42510 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: THE CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR MARCH 3, 2006 (2759)--The Propraeto
F. Galerius Aurelianus S.P.D.

I have tried recently to get in touch with the Propraetor of Austrorientalis, M. Vitellius Legus, concerning the tax issue but he has not responded to my private email nor one to the provincial website. Someone in the Senate should make contact with him to find out if he has had some unexpected situation that has caused him to drop out of touch. However, I would not say that he is "non-existant."

<snip>

M. Hortensia Tribunis Quiritibusque spd;
No wonder I've heard nothing from the Prop. of America
Austrorientalis, he's been misplaced;-).

Please correct this error on the Senate agenda, and place Marcus
Vitellius Legus in the correct Province. And kindly do not prorogue
him- he is non-existant! I tried to get a group together for a
November meeting in S. Carolina, a big Legio meet-up and he did
nothing to further this.

<snip>

> Marcus Vitellius Legus: America Austroccidentalis


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42511 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Roman calendar of events
Salvete, omnes -

I just ran across a calendar, in PDF format, that lists events in the
history of Rome for every day of the calendar. The author, according to
the introduction, has spent a number of years assembling the information
from many sources (listed at the end.)

http://facstaff.uindy.edu/~oaks/Calendar.pdf

If nothing else, it's a fun read.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Ex ungue leonem.
You know the lion from its claw.
-- N/A
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42512 From: P.M. Albucius Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare - Intercessio of praetor edict
P. Memmius Albucius Cordo Consulibus omnibusque s.d.

S.V.G.E.R.

Just some thoughts.

As you, Corde, has well reminded it, each magistrate is free to
organize her/his work unless she/he violates the law.

Here, Consul Strabo thought that the choice of a specific address to
receive the petitiones actionis was a violation.

The case is clear : every address which is specified in a lex is
mandatory for the concerned magistrate ; every other ones are not.

For these last ones, each magistrate has the full power, in her/his
field of power, to set the *administrative* rules that she/he sees
appropriate to set in order to have her/his office fulfilled.
Magistrate X could create a specific address, ask cives to write
her/him to a personal address, etc. But he/she legally may ask
citizens to write to a NR general address. This is just *her/his
problem*, and *her/his responsibility*. If this magistrate thinks
easier to check a mailbox as crowded as a railroad station hall, it
is *up to her/him*. If he/she failed, the citizen may ask her/him
for explanations. This is *just a matter of proof, regarding the
citizen*.

So here, defining an address for the ordinary working of a justice
office falls into the administrative power of the praetor.

Naturally, a consul may veto a praetorian act. But our constitution
says also that praetores authorizes to "issue those edicta (edicts)
necessary to engage in those tasks which advance the mission and
function of Nova Roma and to administer the law (such edicts being
binding upon themselves as well as others);".

So, once again one constitutional rule vs another ?

Consul Strabo's intent was good : to help the praetores not to loose
letters from citizens, because she felt that our citizen's rights
could be in danger. Praetor Paulinus's edict was goodwilling, too.

So I agree with you, Corde. And I think that the consulate has such
a dynamic and leading place in our institutions that it is a little
bit sad seeing it loosing time in such interventions. For if there
is really a danger for the people, I guess one of our five esteemed
tribunes would react.

We need quiet and firm institutions, which think and consult if
necessary before acting, and then take clear and wise decisions
which may not be contested every day by our citizens. No doubt,
Corde, that you will be heard.

Vale, ac valete omnes.


P. Memmius Albucius






--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@...> wrote:
>
> A. Apollonius omnibus sal.
>
> Regardless of the legal niceties (yes, I really did
> say that!), I have to say that this is an example of a
> basic failure on the part of both this year's consules
> to recognize or respect the autonomy of other
> magistrates and constitutional bodies. They seem to
> regard themselves as the chief executives and all
> other magistrates and bodies as their subordinates
> whom they can overrule or interfere with at their
> pleasure. This is a basic misunderstanding of the
> nature of the Roman constitution.
>
> Each elected magistrate is autonomous and answers
> directly and exclusively to the populus (or, in the
> case of the tribunes and plebejan aediles, to the
> plebs). The praetores do not answer to the consules,
> and although the consules may in some cases have the
> power to overrule them they should do so only with
> considerable caution. For a consul to overrule a
> praetor in an area which is at the core of the
> praetores' traditional constitutional role - the
> administration of justice - is extremely irregular and
> inappropriate except in extreme circumstances. It
> shows a total disregard for constitutional propriety
> and for the position of the praetor as the direct
> servant of the populus.
>
> I need not mention other recent examples; they will be
> fresh in people's minds. I urge the consules to give
> very careful thought to the proper role of a consul in
> the constitutional system and to stop their policy of
> interfering in matters which are outside their proper
> and traditional jurisdiction. If they have concerns
> about the way other magistrates and constitutional
> bodies are doing their jobs, they should try to
> persuade before trying to overrule, and if persuasion
> fails they should submit their disputes to the senate.
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Win a BlackBerry device from O2 with Yahoo!. Enter now.
http://www.yahoo.co.uk/blackberry
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42513 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: THE CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR MARCH 3, 2006 (2759)--The Propr
M. Hortensia Fl. Galerio Aureliano spd;
well Flave Galeri where is M. Vitellius Ligus and what
is he doing? To be fair our Provincia is just too large, but I haven't
seen anything of him or even a report.
bene vale
M. Hortensia Maior


However, I would not say that he is "non-existant."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42514 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: Greetings and Salutations... Newbie alert
Salve, Semmie

Welcome to Nova Roma!
So, you know Roman literature. Fantastic! I invite you to check out our For The Muses group, where we honor all the Roman Arts.
www.groups.yahoo.com/group/ForTheMuses
Good to have you with us. :)

Vale bene in pace Deorum,

Maxima Valeria Messallina


Semiramis <semmie17@...> wrote:
Ave!

I'm Semmie17 and was invited here by Senator WCG. I teach Ancient, Medieval and Classical literature at a small university in the great plains region, and am female, 42 and single.

I'll lurk for a bit, but I've got lots of questions since I'm more familiar with Greek and Roman literature than history.

Semmie

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42515 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Sabbatical
F. Galerius Aurelianus flamen Cerialis S.P.D.

I am going to take a short sabbatical for approximately 10 days to
meditate on my future actions both within the CP and NR. Clearly, I
have not been giving either organization my full attention or I would
have seen certain actions in an entirely different light. Be well all.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42516 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: Sabbatical
Salve F. Galeri Aureliane,

Thanks for letting us know. It never hurts to take a little time off
to clear one's head.
This is day 72 for me in the bush of Northern BC. I've been out on an
intense drilling progam without any breaks but alas I shall be home
this weekend. I have lots of catching up to do on a course and only
have had barely enough time to attend to my official duties in NR. I
must say that I am starting to get a little squirrely out here because
when moccasins start looking like high heels, tis time to hit the road.
I shall probably follow your example upon my return and go into a a
meditative mode... ah save St. Patrick's day!

Regards,

QSP




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick D. Owen" <Patrick.Owen@...>
wrote:
>
> F. Galerius Aurelianus flamen Cerialis S.P.D.
>
> I am going to take a short sabbatical for approximately 10 days to
> meditate on my future actions both within the CP and NR. Clearly, I
> have not been giving either organization my full attention or I
would
> have seen certain actions in an entirely different light. Be well
all.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42517 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: CONVENTUS . . . almost . .Conventiculum.BoreoOccidentalis
> Salue, M. Cassi Philippe, et saluete, omnes!
>
> Salve A. T. Scholastica,
>
> Wow, I read it - amazing !!!
>
> ATS: Isn¹t it, though? You CAN understand Latin! I don¹t think you¹re
> up to reading that entire long text below, but you can read a bit even now,
> with only 19 of Wheelock¹s 40 lessons behind you (and that, too, barely behind
> you...).
>
> Vale,
> Marcus Cassius Philippus
>
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: A. Tullia Scholastica
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 5:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] CONVENTUS . . . almost .
> .Conventiculum.BoreoOccidentalis
>
>
>> > Salue, interlocutor inscite, salve, G. Aurelia Falconis Siluana, et
>> saluete,
>> > omnes!
>> >
>> > ATS: GAFS, mitte hanc ad Sodalitatem, amabo te.
>> >
>> > i'm definately interested but would like more info. however, the website
>> link
>> > doesn't seem to work.
>> >
>> > ATS: Can you read the Latin? If so, you belong in the sodalitas
>> > Latinitatis! Please join us! The link is perhaps misspelled, with an >>
extra
>> > l: it should be conventiculum. Try that. Boreo[o]ccidentalis may help,
>> too.
>> >
>> > Valete,
>> >
>> > A. Tullia Scholastica
>> >
>> >
>> > "G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana" <silvanatextrix@...> wrote: G.
>> Aurelia
>> > Falconis Silvana omnes SPD.
>> >
>> > Here's a feature from the website of BOREOOCDIDENTALIS, based
>> > out of Wenatchee Valley College in Washington State USA.
>> >
>> > Ruins-deprived North American Cives may be interested in
>> > supporting colleges and universities that put together such
>> > Conventicula. They are closer to home, and the organizing is
>> > already done.
>> >
>> > Valete bene in pace Deorum
>> >
>> > G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana
>> >
>> > Website: www.wenval.cc/boreooccidentales/boreo_latin/conventilculum.asp
>> >
>> > ==========================================================
>> > Seattli in Vniversitatis Vasintoniensis campo
>> > mense Iunio exeunte ineunteque mense Iulio anni MMVI.
>> >
>> > Sessiones praeparatoriae: diebus 23o et 24o mensis Iunii
>> >
>> > Conventiculum praecipuum: de die 25o usque per diem 1um m. Iulii
>> >
>> >
>> > Moderabuntur
>> >
>> > ▪Stephanus Berard, Ph.D., professor linguarum apud
>> > Studiorum Collegium Vallis Aqualbensis
>> >
>> > ▪Iacobus Dobreff, M.A., Gradus Doctoralis Candidatus apud
>> > Vniversitatem Lundiensem atque unus ex editoribus illius "Axel
>> > Oxenstierna Correspondence Project"
>> >
>> > ▪Akihiko Watanabe, Ph.D., magister praelectorque apud
>> > Facultatem Linguarum Modernarum et Classicarum Vniversitatis
>> > Vasintoniae Occidentalis.
>> >
>> > Aderunt et alii moderatores volubiliter Latine loqui valentes.
>> >
>> > Hoc Conventiculum optimam praebebit occasionem sermonem Latinum
>> > vivissimo modo exercitandi, nam singulis fere diebus excursiones
>> > didascalicas faciemus in quibus licebit participibus non solum
>> > sermones sponte conserere sed etiam omnia quae viderint
>> > fecerintque sermone Latino, adiuvantibus moderatoribus, fuse
>> > describere. Ruri et in hortis colloquemur de arboribus et
>> > plantis, montibus et molibus glacialibus, fluviis, bestiis,
>> > avibus, insectis, caelo aliisque multis. In urbe argumenta
>> > nostra erunt omnia urbana: artes omnes et oblectamenta,
>> > aedificia et vehicula, portus navesque, negotia, tabernae,
>> > libri, vestes, ludi athletici et ita porro. Imprimis placebit
>> > huiusmodi conventiculum eis quibus cordi sint variae amoenitates
>> > locorum (sive rusticorum sive urbanorum) quique ament amice
>> > garrientes variaque facientes modo "kinaesthetico" dicto linguae
>> > peritiam meliorem reddere.
>> >
>> > Quibus sit Idoneum Conventiculum
>> >
>> > Aeque invitantur et ludi magistri et praeceptores scholarum
>> > superiorum et professores, enixeque commendamus conventiculum
>> > hoc studiosis linguarum classicarum graduatis non tantum quod
>> > facultas Latine dicendi peritiam et legendi et scribendi mirum
>> > in modum corroborat verum etiam quod, ut Latinitas viva, quae
>> > nobis cordi est et ad quam nitimur, prorsus renascatur, imprimis
>> > necesse est ipsis futuris praeceptoribus linguam nostram pro
>> > instrumento omnino ad vivendum apto habere eamque ut omnibus
>> > demum rebus humanis, vel modernissimis, exprimendis parem
>> > tractent et doceant. Etiam eos qui fundamenta grammatica Latina
>> > didicerint Latineque iam satis bene legere valeant necdum tamen
>> > Latine colloqui possint ex animo cohortamur ut hoc conventiculum
>> > participent primosque suos sermones Latinos nobiscum serant. In
>> > conventiculis nostris colloquio Latino datis nullo modo est eis
>> > trepidandum erubescendumve qui nondum Latine locuti sint; nam nos fere
>> > omnes potius nuper quam pridem initium Latine loquendi fecimus,
>> > cuius initii difficultatem funditus comprehendimus.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > De Sessionibus Praeparatoriis
>> >
>> > Omnibus qui aliquot loquelae Latinae elementa generalia
>> > exercitare velint erit occasio paucis diebus ante conventiculum
>> > incohatum adveniendi ut diebus 23o et 24o mensis Iunii varias
>> > res familiariores una cum Stephano Berard et Iacobo Dobreff et
>> > forsan aliis moderatoribus Latino sermone celebrent, verba nova
>> > locutionesque utiles discant, linguam sibi aliquantum solvant,
>> > fiduciam loquendi firment.
>> >
>> > De Nominibus Dandis ad Conventiculum Participandum
>> >
>> > Ad Conventiculum Vasintoniense habendum coniungunt opus et
>> > vires Collegium Vallis Aqualbensis et Vniversitas Vasintoniae.
>> > Vt locum in Conventiculo petas mitte schedulam petitionis ad:
>> > Pam Kelley, Administrative Assistant, Liberal Arts and Sciences,
>> > Wenatchee Valley College, 1300 Fifth Street, Wenatchee, WA 98801.
>> >
>> > Hic ice ut schedulam petitionis depromas.
>> >
>> >
>> > De Deversoriis, Cibis, Pretiis, Talibusque Singulis
>> >
>> > Omnia talia singula per studiorum Vniversitatem Vasintoniae
>> > administrabuntur. Simulatque universitatis ministri condiciones
>> > omnino patefecerint, Conventiculum participaturos de omnibus
>> > singulis certiores faciemus necnon praeconium plenius et hoc
>> > loco statuemus et per cursum electronicum aliterque divulgabimus.
>> > Pretia autem haec fere fore videntur. Pro duplici conclavi
>> > solvet quisque cotidie 30 thaleros et pro cibis 15. Qui simplex
>> > conclave cupiet paulo plus impendet. Quae quidem pretia paulo
>> > maiora sunt quam quae vel Aquis Albis vel Lexintoniae solvere
>> > solent plerique; sed si ad pulcherrimam florentissimamque necnon
>> > et sumptuosiorem urbem Seattli atque etiam ad amoenissimum
>> > universitatis campum spectatur, talia pretia re vera modica
>> > apparent. Conventicula Vasintoniensia sunt videlicet multis
>> > non tantum discendi verum etiam dies feriatos iucundos agendi
>> > occasiones. Discipulos hortamur ut stipendia a Conventiculo
>> > petant, quae stidendia non solum ad deversandi ciborumque
>> > sumptus sed etiam ad excursionum pretia adhiberi poterunt.
>> >
>> >
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42518 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Re: CONVENTUS . . . almost . .Conventiculum.Boreoccidentalis
> A. Tullia Scholastica G. Aureliae Falconis Siluanae quiritibus, sociis,
> peregrinisque bonae uoluntatis s.p.d.
>
> G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Duy Mai, A. Tulliae Scholasticae
> omnibusque SPD.
>
> Yea, verily, there were typos. Woe unto they who type in the
> wee hours of the morn. Cubitum abire debemus.
>
> ATS: Re uera. Cubitum ire debemus, et dum oculi aperti sunt, sed labor nos
> uocat, et in laborando, oculi hebetant.
>
> Website CORRECTED MARCH 7
> www.wenval.cc/boreoccidentales/boreo_latin/conventiculum.asp
>
> If I have again messed up, Google: Circulus Latinus Seattlensis.
> The top item on the google hit list should be "Boreoccidentales"
>
> I was also thrown by the single "o" between Boreo and Occidentales.
>
> ATS: They¹re sneaky.
>
> My apologies. I am forwarding the entire original post, as it is
> now a long ways back in the messages.
>
> ATS: Plurimas gratias, et pro renuntiatione a te ad sodalitatem missa.
>
> Valete bene in pace Deorum
>
> G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana"
> <silvanatextrix@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana omnes SPD.
>> >
>> > Here's a feature from the website of *BOREOCCIDENTALES*, based
>> > out of Wenatchee Valley College in Washington State USA.
>> >
>> > Ruins-deprived North American Cives may be interested in
>> > supporting colleges and universities that put together such
>> > Conventicula. They are closer to home, and the organizing is
>> > already done.
>> >
>> > Valete bene in pace Deorum
>> >
>> > G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana
>> >
>> > Website CORRECTED MARCH 7
> www.wenval.cc/boreoccidentales/boreo_latin/conventiculum.asp
>> >
>> > ==========================================================
>> > Seattli in Vniversitatis Vasintoniensis campo
>> > mense Iunio exeunte ineunteque mense Iulio anni MMVI.
>> >
>> > Sessiones praeparatoriae: diebus 23o et 24o mensis Iunii
>> >
>> > Conventiculum praecipuum: de die 25o usque per diem 1um m. Iulii
>> >
>> >
>> > Moderabuntur
>> >
>> > ▪Stephanus Berard, Ph.D., professor linguarum apud
>> > Studiorum Collegium Vallis Aqualbensis
>> >
>> > ▪Iacobus Dobreff, M.A., Gradus Doctoralis Candidatus apud
>> > Vniversitatem Lundiensem atque unus ex editoribus illius "Axel
>> > Oxenstierna Correspondence Project"
>> >
>> > ▪Akihiko Watanabe, Ph.D., magister praelectorque apud
>> > Facultatem Linguarum Modernarum et Classicarum Vniversitatis
>> > Vasintoniae Occidentalis.
>> >
>> > Aderunt et alii moderatores volubiliter Latine loqui valentes.
>> >
>> > Hoc Conventiculum optimam praebebit occasionem sermonem Latinum
>> > vivissimo modo exercitandi, nam singulis fere diebus excursiones
>> > didascalicas faciemus in quibus licebit participibus non solum
>> > sermones sponte conserere sed etiam omnia quae viderint
>> > fecerintque sermone Latino, adiuvantibus moderatoribus, fuse
>> > describere. Ruri et in hortis colloquemur de arboribus et
>> > plantis, montibus et molibus glacialibus, fluviis, bestiis,
>> > avibus, insectis, caelo aliisque multis. In urbe argumenta
>> > nostra erunt omnia urbana: artes omnes et oblectamenta,
>> > aedificia et vehicula, portus navesque, negotia, tabernae,
>> > libri, vestes, ludi athletici et ita porro. Imprimis placebit
>> > huiusmodi conventiculum eis quibus cordi sint variae amoenitates
>> > locorum (sive rusticorum sive urbanorum) quique ament amice
>> > garrientes variaque facientes modo "kinaesthetico" dicto linguae
>> > peritiam meliorem reddere.
>> >
>> > Quibus sit Idoneum Conventiculum
>> >
>> > Aeque invitantur et ludi magistri et praeceptores scholarum
>> > superiorum et professores, enixeque commendamus conventiculum
>> > hoc studiosis linguarum classicarum graduatis non tantum quod
>> > facultas Latine dicendi peritiam et legendi et scribendi mirum
>> > in modum corroborat verum etiam quod, ut Latinitas viva, quae
>> > nobis cordi est et ad quam nitimur, prorsus renascatur, imprimis
>> > necesse est ipsis futuris praeceptoribus linguam nostram pro
>> > instrumento omnino ad vivendum apto habere eamque ut omnibus
>> > demum rebus humanis, vel modernissimis, exprimendis parem
>> > tractent et doceant. Etiam eos qui fundamenta grammatica Latina
>> > didicerint Latineque iam satis bene legere valeant necdum tamen
>> > Latine colloqui possint ex animo cohortamur ut hoc conventiculum
>> > participent primosque suos sermones Latinos nobiscum serant. In
>> > conventiculis nostris colloquio Latino datis nullo modo est eis
>> > trepidandum erubescendumve qui nondum Latine locuti sint; nam nos fere
>> > omnes potius nuper quam pridem initium Latine loquendi fecimus,
>> > cuius initii difficultatem funditus comprehendimus.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > De Sessionibus Praeparatoriis
>> >
>> > Omnibus qui aliquot loquelae Latinae elementa generalia
>> > exercitare velint erit occasio paucis diebus ante conventiculum
>> > incohatum adveniendi ut diebus 23o et 24o mensis Iunii varias
>> > res familiariores una cum Stephano Berard et Iacobo Dobreff et
>> > forsan aliis moderatoribus Latino sermone celebrent, verba nova
>> > locutionesque utiles discant, linguam sibi aliquantum solvant,
>> > fiduciam loquendi firment.
>> >
>> > De Nominibus Dandis ad Conventiculum Participandum
>> >
>> > Ad Conventiculum Vasintoniense habendum coniungunt opus et
>> > vires Collegium Vallis Aqualbensis et Vniversitas Vasintoniae.
>> > Vt locum in Conventiculo petas mitte schedulam petitionis ad:
>> > Pam Kelley, Administrative Assistant, Liberal Arts and Sciences,
>> > Wenatchee Valley College, 1300 Fifth Street, Wenatchee, WA 98801.
>> >
>> > Hic ice ut schedulam petitionis depromas.
>> >
>> >
>> > De Deversoriis, Cibis, Pretiis, Talibusque Singulis
>> >
>> > Omnia talia singula per studiorum Vniversitatem Vasintoniae
>> > administrabuntur. Simulatque universitatis ministri condiciones
>> > omnino patefecerint, Conventiculum participaturos de omnibus
>> > singulis certiores faciemus necnon praeconium plenius et hoc
>> > loco statuemus et per cursum electronicum aliterque divulgabimus.
>> > Pretia autem haec fere fore videntur. Pro duplici conclavi
>> > solvet quisque cotidie 30 thaleros et pro cibis 15. Qui simplex
>> > conclave cupiet paulo plus impendet. Quae quidem pretia paulo
>> > maiora sunt quam quae vel Aquis Albis vel Lexintoniae solvere
>> > solent plerique; sed si ad pulcherrimam florentissimamque necnon
>> > et sumptuosiorem urbem Seattli atque etiam ad amoenissimum
>> > universitatis campum spectatur, talia pretia re vera modica
>> > apparent. Conventicula Vasintoniensia sunt videlicet multis
>> > non tantum discendi verum etiam dies feriatos iucundos agendi
>> > occasiones. Discipulos hortamur ut stipendia a Conventiculo
>> > petant, quae stidendia non solum ad deversandi ciborumque
>> > sumptus sed etiam ad excursionum pretia adhiberi poterunt.
>> >
>
>
>
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42519 From: Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix Date: 2006-03-07
Subject: Resignation
C. Minucius Hadrianus Felix Quiritibus S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

It is with great sadness and regret that I must announce my resignation
as Censor and Senator of Nova Roma, and as the Provincial Legate of the
Massachusetts Regio of Nova Britannia. Unfortunately I find myself
facing a possible conflict of interest between my duties as a corporate
officer and member of the board of directors of Nova Roma and a
potential career in a sensitive position within the United States
Government. I have given the matter a great deal of thought over the
past few weeks, and I have realized that I cannot take the chance that
my position within Nova Roma may put a once in a lifetime career
opportunity at risk.

I intend to remain a private citizen of Nova Roma and member of the
Collegium Pontificum for as long as my changing situation allows.

I would like to thank those citizens who supported my candidacy for
Censor, and I am truly sorry if I have let you down.

Valete bene,
--
Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix
c.minucius.hadrianus@...

"What does it matter by which wisdom each of us arrives at the truth? It
is not possible that only road leads to so sublime a mystery."
- Quintus Aurelius Symmachus c. 340-c.402

"We are all, so far as we inherit the civilization of Europe, still
citizens of the Roman Empire, and time as not yet proved Virgil wrong
when he wrote:
/nec tempora pono: imperium sine fine dedi./"

-T.S. Eliot

"/His ego nec metas rerum nec tempora pono: imperium sine fine dedi./"

"For the achievement of these people I fix neither spatial boundaries or
temporal limits: I have given them empire without end."

-Virgil, /Aeneid/ I.278,279
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42520 From: daylily218 Date: 2006-03-08
Subject: Vivat Wheelock!
Well, I for one, have NO doubt you, Philippe, (as you clearly stated)
read the long passage on the link. I've been plodding onward
in Wheelock myself, and am on Chapter 24 now, and found the
passage largely a more than doable read in about 10 minutes
at most, needing my well-thumbed old dictionary a few times
here and there. I think you were more than up to handling it,
too. I also encourage the use of texts that would allow you
to review old stuff by giving you (yes, edited) passages that
use the knowledge you've learned. It's a delight to do this,
and builds confidence. There are legions of texts that do this:
Cambridge, Oxford, the old Latin Made Simple is a gem, Latin
for Dummies suited me just fine, the Vulgate is a great way to
get a grip on vocabulary and grammar (the Psalms are superb:
old Jerome is a likeable old coot), gee, I'd have to list twenty
more titles if I visited my library. I really like Latin for
Americans. Much of this is anything but baby Latin, by the way.
Wheelock, after all, is edited for the learner. After all, it's
all about learning in a fun way. I haven't a doubt, Philippe,
that you read it and understood it. Kim
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42521 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-08
Subject: Re: Vivat Wheelock!
> A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae uoluntatis
> S.P.D.
>
> Well, I for one, have NO doubt you, Philippe, (as you clearly stated)
> read the long passage on the link. I've been plodding onward
> in Wheelock myself, and am on Chapter 24 now, and found the
> passage largely a more than doable read in about 10 minutes
> at most, needing my well-thumbed old dictionary a few times
> here and there. I think you were more than up to handling it,
> too. I also encourage the use of texts that would allow you
> to review old stuff by giving you (yes, edited) passages that
> use the knowledge you've learned. It's a delight to do this,
> and builds confidence. There are legions of texts that do this:
> Cambridge, Oxford, the old Latin Made Simple is a gem, Latin
> for Dummies suited me just fine, the Vulgate is a great way to
> get a grip on vocabulary and grammar (the Psalms are superb:
> old Jerome is a likeable old coot), gee, I'd have to list twenty
> more titles if I visited my library. I really like Latin for
> Americans. Much of this is anything but baby Latin, by the way.
>
> ATS: Latin for Americans isn¹t...
>
> I rather suspect that the grammar and vocabulary in the Vulgate aren¹t
> quite classical, and doubt that it¹s everyone¹s cup of tea. Some might enjoy
> it, though.
>
>
> Wheelock, after all, is edited for the learner. After all, it's
> all about learning in a fun way. I haven't a doubt, Philippe,
> that you read it and understood it. Kim
>
> ATS: I suspect that MCP did in fact read the passage‹but there is plenty
> of grammar and vocabulary not yet introduced in Wheelock, as well as a good
> bit of vocabulary which is to be found in Assimil, but not Wheelock. It¹s
> just possible, then, that he didn¹t understand the gerunds and gerundives,
> participles, superlative and comparative adjectives, ablatives absolute,
> locatives, and subjunctives to be found therein. He and the other class
> members haven¹t had these little grammatical goodies‹and won¹t see some of
> them for another year, given our moderate pace. There are also a few
> instances of fifth declension nouns, whereas that simple declension will await
> the class in their last lesson. Certainly by now anyone in the class can make
> some sense out of this passage, but full understanding may not be present.
> Not everyone has been busy teaching themselves Latin as you seem to have done,
> though you were unwilling to learn in the class setting with MCP and the
> others.
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
> Praeceptrix Linguae Latinae
>
>
>
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42522 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-08
Subject: post. Non. Mar. (a.d. VIII Id. Mar.)
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est postridie Nones Martias (a.d. VIII Idus Martias); haec dies
fastus aterque est.

"As soon as night falls you will see the Cretan Crown:
Through Theseus' crime Ariadne was made a goddess.
She'd already happily exchanged that faithless spouse for Bacchus,
She who'd given the ungrateful man the thread to follow.
Delighting in her wedded fate, she said: `Why did I weep
Like a country-girl, his faithlessness has been my gain?'
Meanwhile Bacchus had conquered the straight-haired Indians,
And returned with his riches from the Eastern world.
Among the captive girls, of outstanding beauty,
One, the daughter of a king, pleased Bacchus intensely.
His loving wife wept, and treading the curving shore
With dishevelled hair, she spoke these words:
`Behold, again, you waves, how you hear my complaint!
Behold again you sands, how you receive my tears!
I remember I used to say: "Perjured, faithless Theseus!"
He abandoned me: now Bacchus commits the same crime.
Now once more I'll cry: "Woman, never trust in man!"
My fate's repeated, only his name has changed.
O that my life had ended where it first began.
So that I'd not have existed for this moment!
Why did you save me, Liber, to die on these lonely sands?
I might have ceased grieving at that moment.
Bacchus, fickle, lighter than the leaves that wreathe
Your brow, Bacchus known to me in my weeping,
How have you dared to trouble our harmonious bed
By bringing another lover before my eyes?
Alas, where is sworn faith? Where the pledges you once gave?
Wretched me, how many times must I speak those words?
You blamed Theseus and called him a deceiver:
According to that judgement your own sin is worse.
Let no one know of this, let me burn with silent pain,
Lest they think I deserved to be cheated so!
Above all I wish it to be hid from Theseus,
So he may not joy in you as a partner in crime.
I suppose your fair lover is preferred to a dark,
May fair be the colouring of my enemies!
Yet what does that signify? She is dearer to you for that.
What are you doing? She contaminates your embrace.
Bacchus, be true, and do not prefer her to a wife's love.
I am one who would love my husband for ever.
The horns of a gleaming bull captivated my mother.
Yours, me: but this is a love to be praised, hers shameful.
Let me not suffer, for loving: you yourself, Bacchus,
Never suffered for confessing your desire to me.
No wonder you make me burn: they say you were born
In fire, and were snatched from the flames by your father.
I am she to whom you used to promise the heavens.
Ah me, what a reward I suffer instead of heaven!'
She spoke: Liber had been listening a long while
To her complaint, since he chanced to follow closely.
He embraced her, and dried her tears with kisses,
And said: `Together, let us seek the depths of the sky!
You'll share my name just as you've shared my bed,
Since, transmuted, you will be called Libera:
And there'll be a memory of your crown beside you,
The crown Vulcan gave to Venus, and she to you.'
He did as he said, and changed the nine jewels to fire:
Now the golden crown glitters with nine stars." - Ovid, Fasti III

Originally Ariadne was a vegetation goddess in Crete related to the
other Cretan goddesses especially to Britomartis. Sometimes Ariadne
was associated with the surname "Very Holy Maid," because her name is
a variant of Ariagne from the Greek word "agni", which means "the most
holy." Under this title Aphrodite was honoured on Delos.

According to the Greek myths Ariadne was the daughter of the Cretan
king Minos and his wife Pasiphae. The story about her life and death
was narrated by many ways in the different regions, but in all of her
legends she left Crete and she suffered terrible sorrow.

In the Odyssey is told that Ariadne was abducted and taken to the
island of Dia where she died, because Artemis put her to death.
According to the myth which was the most known, she fell in love with
the Athenian hero Theseus, who was coming to Crete to kill the
Minotaur and to rescue the Athenian youth. In the older version of the
myth she was already the loved one of Dionysus, when Theseus came to
Crete. Thus Ariadne helped Theseus by promising her to take her to
Athens as his wife. She gave him two special gifts --- a sword and a
ball of thread --- to find the way back out from the Cnossian
Labyrinth after killing the Minotaur.

As promised, she left Crete with Theseus and with the Athenian youth
and they stopped on the island of Naxos. While Ariadne was asleep, in
her dream (or in Theseus' dream) the god Dionysus appeared on her and
gave her a divine command to stay in Naxos, because he wanted to marry
her. Why did Theseus deserted his sleeping Ariadne in Naxos: maybe he
had already a new lover or he was afraid to bring Ariadne with him to
Athens? So Theseus with the rescued Athenian youth, but without
Ariadne, sailed to Attica over Delos (a small island near Mykonos),
where they performed some rites (a special dance) and dedicated the
old statue of the goddess from Crete to the local sanctuary.

Ariadne in the meantime felt extremely unhappy, when Dionysus came to
save her in Naxos. So, trying to make her feel better he put on her
head the golden crown of Thetis, a work of Hephaestus. Nevertheless we
have to mention that in the other version of her story, she received
this crown from Theseus (and not from Dionysus) as a gift of
Amphitrite. After this gift Dionysus immediately married her. Short
while after Ariadne gave birth to many famous children: first of all
to Staphylos, then Thoas and Oinopion. The last two became the kings
of the islands Lemnos and Chios and in some other versions of the myth
they are represented as the sons of Theseus.

Ariadne's cult on Naxos was performed also with the orgiastic rites
(like the festivals of joy) together with lamentations and expressions
of sorrow (like during funeral ceremonies). In Amathus the sacrifices
were brought in honour of Ariadne and at this place a special cult was
practised in which a young man simulated the pains of a woman giving
childbirth with some screaming. Ariadne was also remembered in the
Athenian festival The Oschophoria (celebration in honour of Theseus)
and in the other Athenian festival The Anthesteria (performed in
honour of Dionysus) as the wife of both of these two protagonists.
Upon her death, the crown of Thetis was placed in the heavens as the
Aurora Borealis.

The Romans knew her as Libera.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Ariadne (http://www.pantheon.org/articles/a/ariadne.html [ed.])
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42523 From: darren_pile Date: 2006-03-08
Subject: Gods
Who would be the Roman god for fertility? Mars or Venus?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42524 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-03-08
Subject: Re: Gods
Salve

On 3/8/06, darren_pile <devon199@...> wrote:
>
> Who would be the Roman god for fertility? Mars or Venus?
>

I shall dare to say, with absolutely no authority on the matter, that there
were several such divinities... Feronia, Robiga, I think I've heard of
Fecunditas as well as the name of a goddness, there was the cult of the
Terra Mater, of the Bona Dea/Fauna, Carmenta in a way as the goddness of
childbirth. Venus, I think, was more the godness of love than fertility
(even if I recall her being genitrix, among the rest, so maybe...).

DCF


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42525 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-03-08
Subject: Re: Gods
SALVE !

Mars.
http://www.pantheon.org/articles/m/mars.html

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

darren_pile <devon199@...> wrote:
Who would be the Roman god for fertility? Mars or Venus?








SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------







NOVA ROMANI !
Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support page to your websites.
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm

"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42526 From: Andy Gyll Date: 2006-03-08
Subject: Re: Gods
Salve!

There are indeed many Deities with responsibility for fertility. To a certain extent it depends what kind of fertility you are talking about.

For example Faunus, Fauna and Lupercus have responsibilty for the fertility of flocks and herds, while Priapus is more concerned with gardens. Vertumnus and Pomona have responsibility for orchards and fruit bushes. There are others as well often linked more to particular geographical areas eg., Feronia in Etruria.

If you are looking for a God with a more widespread brief I would say that Liber Pater and his consort Libera are the obvious ones with responsibility for crops, farm animals and, of course, wine.

Vale!

Brutus


Domitius Constantinus Fuscus <dom.con.fus@...> wrote:
Salve

On 3/8/06, darren_pile <devon199@...> wrote:
>
> Who would be the Roman god for fertility? Mars or Venus?
>

I shall dare to say, with absolutely no authority on the matter, that there
were several such divinities... Feronia, Robiga, I think I've heard of
Fecunditas as well as the name of a goddness, there was the cult of the
Terra Mater, of the Bona Dea/Fauna, Carmenta in a way as the goddness of
childbirth. Venus, I think, was more the godness of love than fertility
(even if I recall her being genitrix, among the rest, so maybe...).

DCF


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





CAIUS MORAVIUS BRUTUS

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger NEW - crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42527 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-08
Subject: Re: Gods
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, darren_pile wrote:

> Who would be the Roman god for fertility? Mars or Venus?

Venus, though syncretized with the Greek Aphrodite (and thus linked with
Mars, who was syncretized with Ares) was a goddess of womanly fertility
and not, like Aphrodite, of general-purpose...uh, another word beginning
with F. She oversaw other vital home activities and was invoked as Venus
Cloacina ("the Purifier") during the regular cleanup drives (as we would
call them) for The City. Perhaps we could think of her as a sweet-
tempered Juno or a married Ceres. Certainly not the sort of goddess who
would fall into bed with a drunken red-neck like Ares, just as Mars, the
guardian of the Romans' fields, wasn't the sort of god who would delight
in shedding blood just for kicks and run around with terrorists and
incendiaries, like Ares.

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42528 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Absent
Salvete omnes,

I am hitting the road from the barbarian wilderness tomorrow and shall
be back in Edmonton Saturday.

Regards,

QSP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42529 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Modern fiction set in Rome
M. Lucretius Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.

There is a wiki page at
http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/Book_reviews:_Modern_fiction dedicated to
short reviews of modern-style fiction set in ancient Rome. (Colleen
McCullough's "Masters of Rome" series, Steven Saylor's "Gordianus The
Finder" mysteries, Lindsey Davis' "Marcus Didius Falco" mysteries).

The page lists nothing more recent than 1997 or so. Would some citizen
who knows something about these series (or any other series that
belongs there) care to update the page? I'll be happy to lend support
to first-time wiki writers.

optime valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42530 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor

Having found that both the Actor, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus, and
the Reus, Caius Minucius Scaevola, are both SVI IVRIS citizens of
Nova Roma and that the reus is neither a serving magistrate nor a
former dictator, which would prevent prosecution, and there is
nothing incongruent in the actor's claims, therefore:

In compliance with the LEX SALICIA POENALIS and under the authority
granted to the Praetors by the laws and the Constitution of Nova
Roma, I hereby submit for adjudication the

Petitio actionis of Domitius Constantinus Fuscus against Caius
Minucius Scaevola

A. INSTITVTIO IVDICIS: "The number of iudices that shall make up
the tribunalis (court of justice) for a certain case shall be
decided by the praetor according to the following guidelines:

A. The tribunalis shall be composed of ten (10) iudices whenever
the intentio includes accusations of laesa patria (seriously
threatening the well-being of the Republic), bribery, embezzlement
of public funds, prevarication, electoral fraud, attacks to
dignitas, slander or libel, or whenever the sententia might imply
the loss of citizenship for one of the parties." "Â…..

Therefore the following citizens are selected as the pool from which
a final ten will be appointed as the Iudices (judges).

Lucius Servilius Primus
A. Ulleria Machinatrix
Aelius Solaris Marullinus
Alexandria Iulia Agrippa
Annia Octavia Indagatrix
Appia Claudia Labieni Ursa
Appia Claudia Laterana
Appius Tullius Marcellus Cato
Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia
Aula Arria Carina
Titus Licinius Crassus
Titus Octavius Decula
Titus Octavius Marcellus
Titus Octavius Salvius
Vibia Ritulia Enodiaria
Vibius Arminius Corbulus

The Actor and the Reus and an advocate and witnesses of their
choosing, along with the iudices will be subscribed to the Nova
Roma Tribunalis yahoo site and will post all communication on the
case to that site and that site only.

The findings of the Court will be transmitted to Praetor Tiberius
Galerius Paulinus who will then convey them to the Senate and
People of Rome in accordance with law.

*********************************************************************
****

INTENTIO: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus has alleged that Caius
Minucius Scaevola has committed:

CALVMNIAE (Libel and Slander): which is defined as
follows: "Whoever is proven to have made to a third party a false
and defamatory statement about a person which has damaged the
dignity or reputation of that person may be compelled to make a
DECLARATIO PVBLICA: the convicted reus shall then present a public
retraction and apology in order to restore the actor's dignity and
reputation in one of Nova Roma's official venues within thirty days
of the official announcement of the sentence."

by "publicly and maliciously, stated, inter alias and in
different posts"

the following in the fora of Nova Roma

"also note that, despite the prodigious quantities of verbiage that
Fuscus pours onto this list - all either negative or insulting, to
the best of my recollection - his comprehension of the written word
remains abysmal."

"the voicing of opinions (...) Fuscus, who is determined to
strangle it as soon as it appears?"

"All the rest of your /ad hominem/ nonsense has been elided, since
I'm uninterested in wasting time on actually talking _to_ you
rather than pointing out your attempts to destroy what you could
never create."

DEMONSTRATIO: The actor is free to introduce any additional
evidence that he believes supports his case.

CONDEMNATIO: If the Iudices find by majority vote that it has been
proved that Caius Minucius Scaevola has committed CALVMNIAE (Libel
and Slander), you, iudices , shall condemn the reus.

Condemned, the reus shall be required to present a public
retraction and apology in order to restore the actor's dignity and
reputation in one of Nova Roma's official venues within thirty days
of the official announcement of the sentence. The reus may also be
placed on moderation for not more than one month per edict of
Praetor Tiberius Galerius Paulinus. Finding otherwise, you shall
acquit Caius Minucius Scaevola.


Given this the 9th day of March 2759 a.u.c (2006 C.E.) at 12:30 pm
Roman time In the consulship of Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus and
Pompeia Minucia Strabo.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42531 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Resignation
Salve,

I'm sorry to see your resignation, but I congratulate you on your "once in a
lifetime opportunity". Good luck with that.

Also, I'll be in MA next week, would be nice to see you there.

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com


----- Original Message -----
From: "Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix"
<c.minucius.hadrianus@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>; "Nova Roma Announce"
<NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 11:04 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Resignation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42532 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 11:47:26AM -0000, Timothy P. Gallagher wrote:
> Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
>
> Having found that both the Actor, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus, and
> the Reus, Caius Minucius Scaevola, are both SVI IVRIS citizens of
> Nova Roma and that the reus is neither a serving magistrate nor a
> former dictator, which would prevent prosecution, and there is
> nothing incongruent in the actor's claims, therefore:
>
> In compliance with the LEX SALICIA POENALIS and under the authority
> granted to the Praetors by the laws and the Constitution of Nova
> Roma, I hereby submit for adjudication the
>
> Petitio actionis of Domitius Constantinus Fuscus against Caius
> Minucius Scaevola

[ snip ]

Since Nova Roma offers no protection against harassment by lawsuit -
other than, theoretically, the *understanding* of law by its Praetors -
and since you, Praetor, have done _exactly_ what I had warned the people
of Nova Roma you would do if you were elected - i.e., be completely
unable to interpret the spirit of the law versus its letter - I consider
this entire proceeding to be a sham, and below my dignity to participate
in.

No matter what, I will not apologize to a vicious, impotent little
weasel for the fact that he's an vicious impotent little weasel. Since
NR has become a playground for lawyers who just have to howl loud enough
to prevent any positive changes, and since they are supported in their
howling by those whose duties are supposed to include protection of the
populace, there's little or no value left for me here in Nova Roma - and
consequently, you have no way to compel me to accept any punishment
whatsoever. Whether you moderate me or drop me from the rolls, I simply
don't care.

Oh, and Fuscus: your attempt to drag me into your scummy little game has
failed. How does it feel to have your impotence demonstrated to a large
group? You're scum, and your presence in any group poisons it. I may or
may not be here to see it, but - for the sake of its own safety - I can
only hope that Nova Roma will vomit you out before your poison destroys
what little remains of it.


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Arte et Marte.
With peaceful effort and warlike feats.
-- N/A
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42533 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

Our first opportunity to play Roman law! What an opportunity.
Everyone get your dice out, and your players handbook and you too can
"roll up" a character in Dungeons and Dragons: The Nova Roma edition.

I really wonder what outsiders think when they see things like what I
see below. What I see is an incredible waste of time, a joke, and a
mockery of what it means to be in an organization like Nova Roma.

Are we here to play in a Roman simulation game?

Petty actions like the one below should be outright dismissed. And
its crap like this that bring shame upon Nova Roma.

Valete:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 3/9/06, Timothy P. Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
> Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
>
> Having found that both the Actor, Domitius Constantinus Fuscus, and
> the Reus, Caius Minucius Scaevola, are both SVI IVRIS citizens of
> Nova Roma and that the reus is neither a serving magistrate nor a
> former dictator, which would prevent prosecution, and there is
> nothing incongruent in the actor's claims, therefore:
>
> In compliance with the LEX SALICIA POENALIS and under the authority
> granted to the Praetors by the laws and the Constitution of Nova
> Roma, I hereby submit for adjudication the
>
> Petitio actionis of Domitius Constantinus Fuscus against Caius
> Minucius Scaevola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42534 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salvete,

I agree with my brethren, Caius Minucius Scaevola, on this one. That whole
thing seems a little inane. First of all, this is the internet and neither
one of them are public figures. They are just people speaking in a Yahoo
Discussion Group. This is more of a matter of having the moderators cut down
on people flaming each other. I mean if someone insulting someone else is
grounds for some sort of tribunal then it seems to me that there ought to be
one every week.

But if this matter must be resolved, I think they ought to fight it out in a
ring. It'd be a lot more entertaining, and less time consuming. Perhaps mud
could be involved....

Valete,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Benjamin A. Okopnik" <ben@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 8:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42535 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salve

On 3/9/06, Benjamin A. Okopnik <ben@...> wrote:
>
>
> No matter what, I will not apologize to a vicious, impotent little weasel
> for the fact that he's an vicious impotent little weasel.
>

(snip)

Oh, and Fuscus: your attempt to drag me into your scummy little game has
> failed. How does it feel to have your impotence demonstrated to a large
> group? You're scum, and your presence in any group poisons it. I may or may
> not be here to see it, but - for the sake of its own safety - I can only
> hope that Nova Roma will vomit you out before your poison destroys
> what little remains of it.
>

You know, you can keep calling me names and invent ever more colorful
insults, but I shall not fall to your level. I will, at most, wonder how
longer does it take before you are put under moderation and how many more
prophanities you will have to utter at me before you will be satisfied.

You are keeping saying things about me, presuming you have any idea about
who or how I am, and why? Because I said some things about an edict from the
Consul? For saying things that when aknoweledged by others (as, if I'm not
mistaken, both Cordus and Palladius Invictus concurred that hearing the
Senate about the wiki thing had some merit) didn't caused the same rabid
reaction from you. Fine.

Do, or don't do, whatever you please, I'm just following the single and only
mean that Nova Roma gives me to act against the constant charachter killing
you are enjoying practicing and I do not think I'm, for that, to be
chastized. I said to the Praetores I wasn't actually even adamant about this
thing, that all I wanted was you to retract the load of insanities you had
said about me. I do not know if they actually took steps in that directions,
but I somehow guess that at least one did and you refused, but anyway it is
obvious that it wouldn't had worked anyway, so... have it your way, keep
insulting along.

Only one thing.. I like the association with weasels, they are quite pretty
animals, unjustly libelled and in mythology, as reported by Pliny, they were
the only beings able to kill basilisks... so, I suppose I should thank you
for the association, but if you mean to insult me, as undubiusly you do, I'd
suggest something else.

DCF


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42536 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salvete omnes, et salve consul,

David Kling (Modianus) wrote:

> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
>
> Our first opportunity to play Roman law! What an opportunity.

For shame consul! While I wish our Praetor would conduct this business
off the main list so as not to invite this sort of legal circus, he is
doing exactly what the law requires of him. You do yourself no honor by
making fun of this proceeding.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42537 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salve,

This has nothing to do with what you said, but I'm going to point out you
spelled 'profanity' & 'libeled' wrong, and 'undubiusly' is not a word (not
in english anyway).

Carry on.

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Domitius Constantinus Fuscus" <dom.con.fus@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor


> Salve
>
> On 3/9/06, Benjamin A. Okopnik <ben@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>> No matter what, I will not apologize to a vicious, impotent little weasel
>> for the fact that he's an vicious impotent little weasel.
>>
>
> (snip)
>
> Oh, and Fuscus: your attempt to drag me into your scummy little game has
>> failed. How does it feel to have your impotence demonstrated to a large
>> group? You're scum, and your presence in any group poisons it. I may or
>> may
>> not be here to see it, but - for the sake of its own safety - I can only
>> hope that Nova Roma will vomit you out before your poison destroys
>> what little remains of it.
>>
>
> You know, you can keep calling me names and invent ever more colorful
> insults, but I shall not fall to your level. I will, at most, wonder how
> longer does it take before you are put under moderation and how many more
> prophanities you will have to utter at me before you will be satisfied.
>
> You are keeping saying things about me, presuming you have any idea about
> who or how I am, and why? Because I said some things about an edict from
> the
> Consul? For saying things that when aknoweledged by others (as, if I'm not
> mistaken, both Cordus and Palladius Invictus concurred that hearing the
> Senate about the wiki thing had some merit) didn't caused the same rabid
> reaction from you. Fine.
>
> Do, or don't do, whatever you please, I'm just following the single and
> only
> mean that Nova Roma gives me to act against the constant charachter
> killing
> you are enjoying practicing and I do not think I'm, for that, to be
> chastized. I said to the Praetores I wasn't actually even adamant about
> this
> thing, that all I wanted was you to retract the load of insanities you had
> said about me. I do not know if they actually took steps in that
> directions,
> but I somehow guess that at least one did and you refused, but anyway it
> is
> obvious that it wouldn't had worked anyway, so... have it your way, keep
> insulting along.
>
> Only one thing.. I like the association with weasels, they are quite
> pretty
> animals, unjustly libelled and in mythology, as reported by Pliny, they
> were
> the only beings able to kill basilisks... so, I suppose I should thank you
> for the association, but if you mean to insult me, as undubiusly you do,
> I'd
> suggest something else.
>
> DCF
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42538 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salve Annia Minucia Marcella

On 3/9/06, Annia Minucia Marcella <annia@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> This has nothing to do with what you said, but I'm going to point out you
> spelled 'profanity' & 'libeled' wrong, and 'undubiusly' is not a word (not
> in english anyway).
>

:) Well, 3 mistakes out of 297 words, making a 1% spelling mistakes in a
mail that I didn't review before sending, in a language that is not my own
and without a spell checker, is not that bad... I wish it would be just that
:)

vale

DCF


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42539 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salve,

Well you made more mistakes than that. I didn't point out the grammar and
punctuation mistakes.

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Domitius Constantinus Fuscus" <dom.con.fus@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor


> Salve Annia Minucia Marcella
>
> On 3/9/06, Annia Minucia Marcella <annia@...> wrote:
>>
>> Salve,
>>
>> This has nothing to do with what you said, but I'm going to point out you
>> spelled 'profanity' & 'libeled' wrong, and 'undubiusly' is not a word
>> (not
>> in english anyway).
>>
>
> :) Well, 3 mistakes out of 297 words, making a 1% spelling mistakes in a
> mail that I didn't review before sending, in a language that is not my own
> and without a spell checker, is not that bad... I wish it would be just
> that
> :)
>
> vale
>
> DCF
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42540 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Let's be polite people
Salvete,

The messages flying around today finding fault with the spelling and
grammar of others are quite unnecessary. Please follow the praetors'
posting guidelines and if you must send out such comments do so as
private e-mail to the persons involved.

Also please keep in mind that many of the people posting here do not
speak English as their first language. I continue to be impressed by
the English language skills of my Spanish and Italian friends, and I
would not find fault with them in public even if my command of their
native languages matched their command of mine.

Valete,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42541 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Let's be polite people
Salve,

There was only one message about spelling today. And it was perfectly
polite. If people can correct others on their Latin or other things, then I
can help someone with their spelling.

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com


----- Original Message -----
From: "Gnaeus Equitius Marinus" <gawne@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:46 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Let's be polite people


> Salvete,
>
> The messages flying around today finding fault with the spelling and
> grammar of others are quite unnecessary. Please follow the praetors'
> posting guidelines and if you must send out such comments do so as
> private e-mail to the persons involved.
>
> Also please keep in mind that many of the people posting here do not
> speak English as their first language. I continue to be impressed by
> the English language skills of my Spanish and Italian friends, and I
> would not find fault with them in public even if my command of their
> native languages matched their command of mine.
>
> Valete,
>
> -- Marinus
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42542 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salve Romans

Just to remind everybody the LAW allows just three reasons for
dismissal.

The LAW allows just three reasons for dismissal!!!!!!!!!!

I listed those and ordered the case to court. I also ordered it to a
difffernt yahoolist so a "legal circus" would not be held on the
main list.

I can only do my duty as I see it.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetor



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes, et salve consul,
>
> David Kling (Modianus) wrote:
>
> > Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
> >
> > Our first opportunity to play Roman law! What an opportunity.
>
> For shame consul! While I wish our Praetor would conduct this
business
> off the main list so as not to invite this sort of legal circus,
he is
> doing exactly what the law requires of him. You do yourself no
honor by
> making fun of this proceeding.
>
> Valete,
>
> -- Marinus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42543 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Marinus:

You can shame me all you want. I believe very strongly that this sort
of crap is a WASTE of time, and it makes Nova Roma look like a joke.
This sort of legal lawyering does not service to Nova Roma and is a
dishonor to our organization. It is a pathetic waste of time, and
frankly if I am the only person in Nova Roma who believes it is a
waste of time I will still said it and I will say it loudly.

What does these sort of "lawsuits" do to improve Nova Roma? Nothing.
Ultimately it will cause people to leave. That, in and of itself, is
a dishonor.

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 3/9/06, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
> Salvete omnes, et salve consul,
>
> David Kling (Modianus) wrote:
>
> > Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
> >
> > Our first opportunity to play Roman law! What an opportunity.
>
> For shame consul! While I wish our Praetor would conduct this business
> off the main list so as not to invite this sort of legal circus, he is
> doing exactly what the law requires of him. You do yourself no honor by
> making fun of this proceeding.
>
> Valete,
>
> -- Marinus
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42544 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salve,

Your post needs more exclamation points. There aren't nearly enough to get
your point across.

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Timothy P. Gallagher" <spqr753@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:58 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor


> Salve Romans
>
> Just to remind everybody the LAW allows just three reasons for
> dismissal.
>
> The LAW allows just three reasons for dismissal!!!!!!!!!!
>
> I listed those and ordered the case to court. I also ordered it to a
> difffernt yahoolist so a "legal circus" would not be held on the
> main list.
>
> I can only do my duty as I see it.
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Praetor
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> <gawne@...> wrote:
>>
>> Salvete omnes, et salve consul,
>>
>> David Kling (Modianus) wrote:
>>
>> > Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
>> >
>> > Our first opportunity to play Roman law! What an opportunity.
>>
>> For shame consul! While I wish our Praetor would conduct this
> business
>> off the main list so as not to invite this sort of legal circus,
> he is
>> doing exactly what the law requires of him. You do yourself no
> honor by
>> making fun of this proceeding.
>>
>> Valete,
>>
>> -- Marinus
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42545 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:

> > Our first opportunity to play Roman law! What an opportunity.
>
> For shame consul! [...]
> You do yourself no honor by making fun of this proceeding.

There's no shame in calling a spade a spade. This entire proceeding
is a travesty that brings shame on our entire organization.

We cannot fault Praetor Galerius Paulinus for this; he is carrying
out the law as written and has no choice in the matter.

I do not believe the authors of this law ever intended for it to be
used for petty revenge for mailing list squabbles. A good-intentioned
law has been hijacked by an abuser and used as a means to squash debate
and punish personal enemies. Sadly, there is no provision in the lex
for a frivolous plaintiff to be fined or punished for abuse, and thus
we will see more of this vile misuse until something is done to put
a stop to it.

I call upon the Consuls to bring before the Comitia a proposal to
strike the "slander" and "libel" portions of the Lex Salicia Poenalis
and to vacate any judgements that may be rendered in the meantime.

Vale, Octavius.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42546 From: Paul Jones Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Modern fiction set in Rome
Salvete,
Don't forget about the Emperor series by Conn Iggulden.There are now four books in the series charting the life of Julius Caesar.Makes for very interesting reading.
Vale,
Decimus Iullius Paullus

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42547 From: Steve Mesnick Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Modianus consul scripsit:

> I really wonder what outsiders think when they see things like what I
> see below. What I see is an incredible waste of time, a joke, and a
> mockery of what it means to be in an organization like Nova Roma.

Since you wondered, I'll answer, as a new citizen: I'm saddened and
bemused, and (I must admit) morbidly fascinated. I see a lot of
parallels, actually, to what I often hear from newcomers to the
various online fora of the Society for Creative Anachronism (of
which I'm an almost-30-year veteran). I'd like to think that the
same dynamic is in play, namely that the vicious politics get
"concentrated" in the fora due to the stridency of small clots of
ne'er-do-wells, and the actual workings of the club are rather
more congenial than would appear through that lens. I don't know
any of you folks, so I have no preconceived notions of who's right
or wrong, or even (truth be told) what this dispute is all about. I
suppose that's an advantage at the moment, but lemme tell ya, it ain't
lookin' pretty.

Since you asked....

Aulus Tullius Severus
--

===========================================================
Grant me the company of those who seek truth, and
protect me from those who have found it.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42548 From: Legion XXIV Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Legion XXIV Vicesima Quarta Newsletter March 2006
VICESIMA QUARTA
The Newsletter of
LEGION XXIV - MEDIA ATLANTIA

MARCH 2006

Gallio Velius Marsallas / George Metz
Praefectus - Commander
13 Post Run - Newtown Square PA 19073-3014
610-353-4982
legionxxiv@... www.legionxxiv.org

Commilitones:

ADVENAE - Newcomers
*** Joseph DiGrazio Cassius Artorius Magnas docnkate@... hails from Milford in northeast PA. He is well situated for our campaigns in the Northeast region and anxious to get himself outfitted for duty. He is actively engaging in making his caligae, tunic and acquiring armor, helmet and gladius. We look forward to having him with us at our upcoming campaigns.
*** Gary Bjorlin Caius Victricius Galvisius garybjorlin@... is former Marine now working in Iraq. He has cavalry reenactment experience, and with his Marine background, should be an asset to our ranks.
*** Aaron Mott Titinius naruto250@... has been rostered as a squire-recruit. He has an avid interest in ancient Rome and its Legions and hopes to be with us on future campaigns.

HMGS PA GAMERS "COLD WARS" - LANCASTER PA - MARCH 18 - 19
CALL TO ARMS - The Historical Miniature Gamers Society (HMGS) has contacted our sister Legion XX to provide a Roman Legion presence at their Annual "Cold Wars" Gamers Convention and they would appreciate our support. The event is on a Saturday and Sunday at the Lancaster Host Resort, 2300 Lincoln Highway East, Lancaster, PA 17602. 717-299-5500 It is an indoor event, which is most welcome during the iffy weather of March. The expected hours of the "Meet and Greet" campaign would be 10AM till 4PM, which would mean we should arrive by 9AM for set-up and preparation. Your Commander would welcome having some companionship on either or both days.
The convention website has maps, directions, schedules, lodging info and much more at http://www.coldwars.org/ This is would be a good event to test-out your gear and those "Winter Quarters" repairs prior to our open field campaigns. The coordinator needs participants' names for admission passes, so please let me know ASAP which days you would like to attend.


MARCHING THRU TIME - APRIL 22 - 23
Marching Through Time is coming up! On April 22-23 at Marietta Mansion, the Legion will once again be one of over thirty different
historical groups performing for the public, from 11 AM to 5 PM both days. Most of us know the drill pretty well by this time--speaking of which, we should expect to be doing our marching demonstration first thing after opening, so please come early. PLEASE let the Commander know if you plan to attend, and if you are interested in staying for the barbecue on Saturday
night. Remember that cars will not be permitted into the camp area after 9:30 AM on Saturday (and not at all on Sunday until after 5 PM), so get there early if you need to unload gear. Also, there will be set-up and groups of school kids coming through from 10 to 2 on Friday the 21st. Marietta is at 5626 Bell Station Rd., Glenn Dale, MD 20769. 301-464-5291. The Site Manager is Susan Wolfe. From I-95/495, the Capital Beltway, take Exit 20 onto Rt. 450 East, go 4 miles, turn left on Rt. 193, then left onto Bell Station Rd. and left again into Marietta.
For Marching Through Time, only handicapped parking is permitted on site (due to lack of space), public parking being available at the recreation just beyond Bell Station Rd. Follow the signs and then catch the shuttle vans back to the site. Participants can also park along Rt. 193, at their own risk.
http://www.pghistory.org/MariettaMansion.html

PA JUNIOR CLASSICAL LEAGUE STATE CONVENTION - MAY 20
The Legion has been invited to set up camp at the Pennsylvania Junior Classical League State Convention on May 20, 2006.
This will be held at Pennsylvania State University in State College, (mid-state) PA, and it is a one-day event. They are providing dormitory space for us for Friday and Saturday nights, if necessary. That way we could easily be set up by 9 AM when the program starts. This convention is attended by over 600 high school Latin students, all of whom will naturally be more interested in Classical history and more motivated than the average high school audience. So it should be a very rewarding event. Directions and more details to follow.

TAKE A WALK ON THE BOARDWALK - JUNE 3 - 4
Again a reminder that Keith Egan, fundraising walk chairperson for the annual conference for the Rotary District 7640 (southern New Jersey) is looking for some legionaries for an event scheduled for June 3-4 of 2006, which is also the weekend of Roman Days in Maryland. However, If you are not planning to be at Roman Days and would like to "Take a Walk on the Boardwalk" as a Roman legionary with Caesar and Cleopatra, please read-on and contact Keith at kcegan2@... or 609-347-1087 www.southjerseyaidsalliance.org
The conference is to be held in Atlantic City and Keith is looking to make the beginning of the fundraising walk as spectacular and entertaining as the city can offer. One suggestion that has been made is to have the actors who portray Caesar and Cleopatra and their retinue at Caesar's Hotel Casino start off the walk that will ultimately end near their casino location. Keith would like to add a troop of legionaries in formation to approach the spectacle that is wanted and help to generate the kind of enthusiastic response from walkers that will help them to earn significant funds for the Rotary Foundation. If you are not familiar with the foundation, it is an international philanthropic fund that is used to support humanitarian projects across the globe. Some of the types of projects that have been implemented include support for inoculations against infectious diseases; orphanages and schools; and fresh water system development in third world countries in addition to supporting a wide range of programs and services (e.g., literacy and nutrition programs for needy children) throughout the United States each year.

MARCH ALONG HADRIAN'S WALL - JUNE 20 - 30
ATTENTUS !! Robert Garbisch, Centurio Marcus ~ Legio X Fretensis ~ Cohors IV, in California is issuing a general invitation to various Roman Legions located here in the USA. Please feel welcome to help distribute this invitation to anyone or any other Roman group that you feel would be interested in joining us for a historical "First-Time" Roman March in full kit along the entire length of Hadrian's Wall. Apparently this great adventure has yet to be done in our modern 21st century time. He is currently looking for 4 more dedicated and loyal Roman Legionaries to join him for this duty of serving Rome.
*** He is trying to arrange for authentic Roman meals during the march. There will be some nights where we will be camping on arms at a campground, or somewhere along the Wall. Efforts are also being made to enlist the aid of some of the local Roman units stationed along the Wall. Hopefully we will be able to spend a night or two camping with them. They may even join us for marching along parts of this long route. Apparently, this type of an Roman adventure has yet to be done. So we will be making history here as the first Roman Legion to ever attempt this type of a Roman March along the entire length of Hadrian's Wall.
*** Nigel Cole, of Catswhiskers Tours will be the guide and QuarterMaster for this journey in time. Please check out his web site at http://www.catswhiskerstours.co.uk/roman.asp. Here you will be instructed in how you can make your $250 deposit to insure your assigned place on the duty roster. This payment and future payments of $500 per month for February, March, and April can be easily made by using your credit card. A final payment in May will be determined by how many are actually going and the total cost to finance this great Roman adventure.
*** Efforts are being made to minimize the cost of this adventure. The more men he can enlist, up to a maximum of 10 Legionaries, the lower the cost for all of us. The limit of 10 was set due to the limited size of our transportation vehicle, the available size of period lodging at the South Shield's Roman Fort, and our own personal group impact affect upon the Hadrian's Wall Trail. You can either make effective use of his travel tour services for your airfare or arrange for your own airfare.
*** If you have any questions about this Roman March Adventure, please contact Robert W. Garbisch (Centurio Marcus ~ Legio X Fretensis ~ Cohors IV) at the e-mail address posted above. He may still have a choice position open for this historic endeavor.

***The proposed schedule for our Roman March is posted below. Our final stop for each night will be determined by Nigel as he conducts a more detailed check of our route for meeting our camping and lodging needs.

June 19th - Monday = Depart from your chosen airport.

June 20th - Tuesday = Arrive at Newcastle Airport, in England. Nigel will pick you up and transport you to the Roman Fort at South Shield. There we will be expected to conduct some public presentations. This is necessary for us to justify our stay there. So please come prepared to do some public presentations. It will be fun to do!

June 21st - Wednesday = Transfer by motor vehicle to Segedunum, a Roman Cavalry Fort. Tour the museum and restored buildings there. Transfer by motor vehicle to bypass the urban route through Newcastle to reach Newburn and the start of the scenic rural route at Tyne Riverside Country Park. March to Heddon-on-the-Wall to connect with the first real visible evidence of Hadrian's Wall. Visit the ruins of the Vindobala Roman Fort. Proceed to Halton. We will be marching about 13 miles/20 km. Lodging near Halton.

June 22nd - Thursday = Take a circular walk to Corbridge. Visit the museum and ruins of the Roman Fort there. Continue on to Chollerford. Campground or lodging near Chollerford. March about 12 miles/18 km.

June 23rd - Friday = Chollerford to Steel Rigg via Chester and Housesteads. Visit the Chester Roman Fort. Visit the Brocolita Roman Fort. Visit the Vercovicium Roman Fort at Housesteads. Camp with the local Romans there? Camp at Winshields? March 13 miles/20 km.

June 24th - Saturday = Circular walk to Vindolanda. Tour the Vindolanda Roman Fort. Proceed to the Roman Army Museum at Carvoran. Visit the Magnis Roman Fort. Camp with the local Romans? Camp at Greenhead? March around 13 miles/20 km.

June 25th - Sunday = Proceed to visit the Birdoswald Roman Fort, continue on to Walton. Stay at a local lodge. March around 12 miles/19 km.

June 26th - Monday = March to Carlisle. Stay at a local lodge. March around 11 miles/18 km.

June 27th - Tuesday = A Free Day of Rest. Visit the many interesting local Roman ruins and museums plus lots of unusual shops. No marching in your Roman full kit on this day.

June 28th - Wednesday = March from Carlisle to Bowness-on-Solway. Finis! Stay at a local lodge. Enjoy the scenic view as you will have now successfully completed this great Roman March Adventure. Rest and reflect upon what you have so nobly accomplished. March around 15 miles/24 km.

June 29th - Thursday = Take a motor transport for returning to the Roman Fort at South Shield. Enjoy a well deserved R & R. If you feel up to it, take a trip to the fabulous international mall at Newcastle. Lots of interesting stores and restaurants there to enjoy. Prepare to return home.

June 30th - Friday = Motor transport to the Newcastle Airport. Return home. Or if you would like to visit other historical sites in England, then you are now released from your duties to Rome. Have a safe trip home.

Local scholars are expressing great interest in our proposed march. There is also potential interest from the local news media along our route. Nigel also proposed filming our adventure with the prospect of selling it to the History Channel or BBC, which if accepted, could help fund this adventure.

Firmitas et Honorare! Centurio Marcus Antonius Lucius Legio X Fretensis ~ Cohors IV

ROMAN DAYS NORTHEAST - Sept 30
This event is now in limbo. Lawrence and Julie of LaWrens Nest, who were the sponsors of RDNE, will be moving to Virginia this summer and will not be able to sponsor the event in Connecticut. The Legions of the Northeast, III, VI, IX, & XXX, along with XXIV are looking into sponsoring a time-line or Rome Only event at a site in southern Connecticut on Saturday Sept-30. Stay tuned for further details.


While we are in Winter Quarters, plan to repair and upgrade your gear for 2006 Campaign Season!

UPCOMING CAMPAIGNS for LEGION XXIV and OTHER EVENTS for 2005

*** March 17 - 19 Historical Miniature Gamers Soc. convention, Lancaster Host Resort, Rt-30, PA www.coldwars.org

*** April 22 - 23 Marching Thru Time, Marietta Mansion, 5626 Bell Station Road, Glenn Dale, MD

*** May 20 Encampment for PA Junior Classical League State Convention, PA State Univ., State College, PA

*** June 3 - 4 Roman Days, Marietta Mansion, Glenn Dale, MD or Walk on the Boardwalk in A.C.

*** June 17 - 18 Muster on the Maumee, Fort Meigs, Perrysburg, Ohio

*** August 5 - 6 Time Line Event, Fort Malden, Amherstburg, Ontario

*** Sept 30 Roman Days NE, Southern CN ?

*** Oct 14 - 15 Time Line Event, Fort No.4, Charlestown, NH


Thanking you for your continued support of Legion XXIV, I remain;

Yours in the Bonds of Ancient Rome

Gallio / George




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42549 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modianus quiritibusque sal.

Salve et salvete.

Your speech is precisely why people might find cause to ridicule us,
consul. You obviously have little regard for the law --- you are
willing to urge a magistrate to simply "dismiss" a right guaranteed to
the citizens of the Republic, not to mention your aborted attempt to
violate the lex Constitutiva --- and are seemingly only interested in
the actual machinery of government when it comes time to throw around
some of your assumed power. Living in a restored Republic is not just
bubble gum and sunglasses, consul. It's the annoying bits of everyday
life that we have to deal with on a consistent basis, too.

Your authority does not include deciding what the citizens "should" or
"should not" approach the praetors, consul. I happen to think that
Fuscus is technically legally incorrect, but not because he is any
less entitled to bring a petitio forward than anyone else, for any reason.

Vale et valete,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "David Kling (Modianus)"
<tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
>
> Our first opportunity to play Roman law! What an opportunity.
> Everyone get your dice out, and your players handbook and you too can
> "roll up" a character in Dungeons and Dragons: The Nova Roma edition.
>
> I really wonder what outsiders think when they see things like what I
> see below. What I see is an incredible waste of time, a joke, and a
> mockery of what it means to be in an organization like Nova Roma.
>
> Are we here to play in a Roman simulation game?
>
> Petty actions like the one below should be outright dismissed. And
> its crap like this that bring shame upon Nova Roma.
>
> Valete:
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42550 From: Stefanie Beer Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Modern fiction set in Rome
L.Flavia Lectrix M. Lucretio Agricolae SPD
Interesting page! I´d like to see John Maddox Roberts´ "SPQR"-series
included! I can find all the titles and reviews, but it´ll take some time
since I´m about to move my little family (daughter, cats and myself) to a
place some 350 km away in the first week of April while at the same time
learning for the final exam of med school in mid-May. So if it can wait
until after the exam, I´d be delighted to help!
Vale!

-------Originalmeldung-------

Von: M. Lucretius Agricola
Datum: 03/09/06 10:40:49
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Modern fiction set in Rome

M. Lucretius Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.

There is a wiki page at
http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/Book_reviews:_Modern_fiction dedicated to
short reviews of modern-style fiction set in ancient Rome. (Colleen
McCullough's "Masters of Rome" series, Steven Saylor's "Gordianus The
Finder" mysteries, Lindsey Davis' "Marcus Didius Falco" mysteries).

The page lists nothing more recent than 1997 or so. Would some citizen
who knows something about these series (or any other series that
belongs there) care to update the page? I'll be happy to lend support
to first-time wiki writers.

optime valete









Yahoo! Groups Links







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42551 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, gaiusequitiuscato wrote:
>
> Your speech is precisely why people might find cause to ridicule us,
> consul.

Our plethora of laws and an internal lawsuit for "slander" bring no
glory to this organization. Ridicule is deserved. The Consuls are in
a unique position to do something about it by convening the comitia
to clean house, and I hope they do so.

> You obviously have little regard for the law

Not speaking for the consul, but I, personally, have less than zero regard
for the section of the particular law that has caused the current
conflict. It's an impediment to community building, and it needs to go.

> Living in a restored Republic is not just bubble gum and sunglasses, consul.

"bubble gum and sunglasses"? That's an interesting perspective, considering
that Consul Modianus's top priority is the restoration of the Religio.
Destroying community by an overabundance of legislation straight out
of the "Dungeon Master's Guide" is an obstacle to the great work that
many of us hope to accomplish.

A "lawsuit", even in kangaroo court, over insults made on a mailing list
is a far more disastrous thing for community than any amount of those
insults could ever be. The accused, even though he's stated he will
not post the bogus apology that is demanded of him, is faced with the
humiliating prospect of having his name recorded in the tabularium as
"guilty" of a "crime". Naturally, he'll have little motive to stay
here and contribute if that happens - and Scaevola *is* someone who has
done much for Nova Roma; he recently held the office of Magister Aranearius,
one of the hardest working positions here in spite of its low visibility.

Filing a lawsuit, even a play one, over mailing list insults is the
equivalent of bringing a knife to a pillow fight. No matter who was in
the wrong initially, the conflict has now been unacceptably escalated.
That knives are made available to children is something that the Consul
may be able to fix, through the Comitia.

> Your authority does not include deciding what the citizens "should" or
> "should not" approach the praetors, consul.

"should" expresses an opinion, and the Consul is as entitled to speak
his opinion as anyone else. Only when he uses words such as "must"
or "you will" is the Consul exercising his authority. The Consul is
no figurehead (like some modern monarchs), unable to express an opinion;
the Consul is a leader and should act as such, not just through
edicts and compulsion but by taking a firm moral stand against the
insidious rot of our society.

Vale, M. Octavius Germanicus.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42552 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
C. Equitius Cato M. Octavio Germanico quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Octavius Germanicus, you wrote:

"Not speaking for the consul, but I, personally, have less than zero
regard for the section of the particular law that has caused the
current conflict."

An interesting perspective. It is not your choice to obey only those
laws for which you have a personal high regard. The rule of law is
what seperates us from savages and barbarians, Octavius Germanicus.
It is binding upon us all, whether we like it or not.


You also wrote:

"Filing a lawsuit, even a play one, over mailing list insults is the
equivalent of bringing a knife to a pillow fight. No matter who was
in the wrong initially, the conflict has now been unacceptably escalated."

"Play" one? This is a lawsuit filed by one citizen against another in
accordance with the laws of our Republic. Whether or not you like it,
we are bound by the law. It is not yours to decide to what extent an
argument has escalated, unless you intend to seek a remedy in the very
laws you sneer at. The entire point of the existence of the law is
precisely to create a venue through which the People can have their
grievances heard and forms the bedrock of a civil society.



You wrote:

"...the Consul is a leader and should act as such, not just through
edicts and compulsion but by taking a firm moral stand against the
insidious rot of our society."

This is the same consul who attempted to subvert the lex Constitutiva,
the same consul who attempted to abrogate the rights and privileges of
the body that exists solely for the governance of the religio; A
"firm moral stand" that encourages ignoring or dismissing out of hand
those laws for which he has no liking? Again, an interesting
perspective on what "moral" means, Octavius Germanicus. The idea of
someone with that understanding of what morality entails "clean[ing]
house", as you put it, is horrifying.

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42553 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salve,


I think there is a real difference between "rule of law" and micromanaging
everyone's behaviour.

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 5:15 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor


> C. Equitius Cato M. Octavio Germanico quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salve et salvete.
>
> Octavius Germanicus, you wrote:
>
> "Not speaking for the consul, but I, personally, have less than zero
> regard for the section of the particular law that has caused the
> current conflict."
>
> An interesting perspective. It is not your choice to obey only those
> laws for which you have a personal high regard. The rule of law is
> what seperates us from savages and barbarians, Octavius Germanicus.
> It is binding upon us all, whether we like it or not.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42554 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
> An interesting perspective. It is not your choice to obey only those
> laws for which you have a personal high regard.

I am disobeying no law, nor am I advocating that anyone do so. What I
*am* advocating is a lessening of the burden of laws we struggle under -
and that those who abuse the process should feel the contempt of the
community.

> The rule of law is
> what seperates us from savages and barbarians, Octavius Germanicus.

That and toilet paper.

Vale, O.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the
voices you are throttling today." -- August Spies, 1887
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42555 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salve,

>> The rule of law is
>> what seperates us from savages and barbarians, Octavius Germanicus.
>
> That and toilet paper.
>


HHAHAHAHAA! Oh my, that just made me laugh out loud. Good thing I hadn't
taken a sip of my drink while reading that, it'd be all over my new
keyboard. Then I'd have to sue you for damages.

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42556 From: muidopure Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Annia Minucia Marcella" <annia@...>
wrote:
>
I agree with my brethren, Caius Minucius Scaevola, on this one.>

This has nothing to do with what you wrote. But "brethren" is plural,
and cannot properly be used when speaking of Caius Minucius Scaevola
alone.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42557 From: Lance Frizzell-Reynolds Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salvete,


I am new to Nova Roma and the statement below and the many that I
have seen on this list are petty, childish and are beginning to make me rethink my belonging to this group.

Why must people feel it so compelling to degrade and demean each
other? Don't many of us face this enough in life because of our
faith and beliefs? (Those adhering to Religio Romana and other pagan and non-mainstream faiths anyways.)

Who cares if someone's grammar is not perfect in their posts? This
list seems to have nothing to do with Nova Roma at times and more to do with belittling other members.

I hope this is not representative of the Nova Roma as a
whole, thus far I am pretty sure I have made a mistake in joining,


Servius Apollonius Leo



On Mar 9, 2006, at 5:49 PM, muidopure wrote:

> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Annia Minucia Marcella" <annia@...>
> wrote:
> >
> I agree with my brethren, Caius Minucius Scaevola, on this one.>
>
> This has nothing to do with what you wrote. But "brethren" is plural,
> and cannot properly be used when speaking of Caius Minucius Scaevola
> alone.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
> Fall of the roman empire The roman empire
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42558 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius GalerÂ…Â…Now OFF TOPIC
Salve Romans

The Petitio actionis of Domitius Constantinus Fuscus against Caius
Minucius Scaevola is now before the courts. Thus it is not an
appropriate issue to be discussed in this forum.

Its adjudication will take place off this list.

If you want to comment on it privately fine but the issue is now
OFF TOPIC for the main list of Nova Roma.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42559 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Modern fiction set in Rome
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Jones" <tuba65@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete,
> Don't forget about the Emperor series by Conn Iggulden.There are now
four books in the series charting the life of Julius Caesar.Makes for
very interesting reading.
> Vale,
> Decimus Iullius Paullus
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Salve,

If you know about them and have read them, why not make entries
yourself? That is what a wiki is all about.

Wikimagistri are available to help.

Optime vale

M. Lucretius Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42560 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
In a message dated 3/9/2006 3:40:45 PM Pacific Standard Time,
lereynol@... writes:
I am new to Nova Roma and the statement below and the many that I
have seen on this list are petty, childish and are beginning to make me
rethink my belonging to this group.
Oh please don't do that. You are just in the Forum on a bad day. There is
actually a lot of good to gained here. You will find people so dedicated to
Roman ideals that they pledge
an oath to see them carried out. You will find clubs dedicated to various
aspects of Roman life with very knowledgeable members, usually able to answer
questions about Rome and life in Rome, if they cannot they will steer you to
someone who can.

When it comes to petty behavior the old Roman Republic wasn't much different.

We have plenty of stories from Livius and Tullius about different families
holding vendettas,
abusing, even out right ignoring the law and acting very childish.
So what you see here today will happen on occasion. It is all part of being
human as well as being a Roman enthusiasts.

I pray you ignore that part and look into the good that is Nova Roma.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42561 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Nova Roma is not as bad as you think.
In a message dated 3/9/2006 4:01:52 PM Pacific Standard Time,
QFabiusMaxmi@... writes:
In a message dated 3/9/2006 3:40:45 PM Pacific Standard Time,
lereynol@... writes:
I am new to Nova Roma and the statement below and the many that I
have seen on this list are petty, childish and are beginning to make me
rethink my belonging to this group.


Oh please don't do that. You are just in the Forum on a bad day. There is
actually a lot of good to gained here. You will find people so dedicated to
Roman ideals that they pledge
an oath to see them carried out. You will find clubs dedicated to various
aspects of Roman life with very knowledgeable members, usually able to answer
questions about Rome and life in Rome, if they cannot they will steer you to
someone who can.

When it comes to petty behavior the old Roman Republic wasn't much different.

We have plenty of stories from Livius and Tullius about different families
holding vendettas,
abusing, even out right ignoring the law and acting very childish.
So what you see here today will happen on occasion. It is all part of being
human as well as being a Roman enthusiasts.

I pray you ignore that part and look into the good that is Nova Roma.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42562 From: Lance Frizzell-Reynolds Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
It's not so much what I have seen today but what I have seen over the
past week.

I think I was a little extreme in my email, I would never leave Nova
Roma as a whole, however I would more than likely leave the Forum.
Being a non-traditional University student, I get my fill of
stupidity on a daily basis and ridiculing others for grammar,
spelling and other nonsense is right up there, qualifying as the
Pontiff of stupidity.

Thank you for the encouragement, I think I needed that more than
anything. The Religio Romana Forum is the only other thing I have to
compare this Forum to when it comes to Nova Roma, and the Religio
Romana forum is quite impressive!
Servius Apollonius Leo

On Mar 9, 2006, at 6:59 PM, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:

> In a message dated 3/9/2006 3:40:45 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> lereynol@... writes:
> I am new to Nova Roma and the statement below and the many that I
> have seen on this list are petty, childish and are beginning to
> make me
> rethink my belonging to this group.
> Oh please don't do that. You are just in the Forum on a bad day.
> There is
> actually a lot of good to gained here. You will find people so
> dedicated to
> Roman ideals that they pledge
> an oath to see them carried out. You will find clubs dedicated to
> various
> aspects of Roman life with very knowledgeable members, usually able
> to answer
> questions about Rome and life in Rome, if they cannot they will
> steer you to
> someone who can.
>
> When it comes to petty behavior the old Roman Republic wasn't much
> different.
>
> We have plenty of stories from Livius and Tullius about different
> families
> holding vendettas,
> abusing, even out right ignoring the law and acting very childish.
> So what you see here today will happen on occasion. It is all part
> of being
> human as well as being a Roman enthusiasts.
>
> I pray you ignore that part and look into the good that is Nova Roma.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
> Fall of the roman empire The roman empire
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42563 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salve,

Yes, I know. I meant it as "one of my brethren". It's too bad we can't
correct our posts after sending them. Another reason I recommend using a php
forum instead of this awful yahoo discussion group.

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "muidopure" <muidopure@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 5:49 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor


> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Annia Minucia Marcella" <annia@...>
> wrote:
>>
> I agree with my brethren, Caius Minucius Scaevola, on this one.>
>
> This has nothing to do with what you wrote. But "brethren" is plural,
> and cannot properly be used when speaking of Caius Minucius Scaevola
> alone.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42564 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Modern fiction set in Rome
M. Lucretius Agricola L. Flaviae Lectrici S.P.D.

Perhaps I was not clear when I posted perviously. This isn't about
finding reviews by someone else. In fact, it would probably be a
copyright violation to do so.

What I'm suggesting is that a citizen who has read these sorts of
books can make a brief entry and add a line or two. Was it a
worthwhile read? Was it as good as previous books in the series.
Nothing extensive, just a few lines.

If you see a book already listed on the page and you have something to
add, please do so. Wikis are all about collaboration.


Optime vale et valete



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Stefanie Beer" <sbeer@...> wrote:
>
> L.Flavia Lectrix M. Lucretio Agricolae SPD
> Interesting page! I´d like to see John Maddox Roberts´ "SPQR"-series
> included! I can find all the titles and reviews, but it´ll take some
time
> since I´m about to move my little family (daughter, cats and myself)
to a
> place some 350 km away in the first week of April while at the same time
> learning for the final exam of med school in mid-May. So if it can wait
> until after the exam, I´d be delighted to help!
> Vale!
>
> -------Originalmeldung-------
>
> Von: M. Lucretius Agricola
> Datum: 03/09/06 10:40:49
> An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Modern fiction set in Rome
>
> M. Lucretius Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.
>
> There is a wiki page at
> http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/Book_reviews:_Modern_fiction dedicated to
> short reviews of modern-style fiction set in ancient Rome. (Colleen
> McCullough's "Masters of Rome" series, Steven Saylor's "Gordianus The
> Finder" mysteries, Lindsey Davis' "Marcus Didius Falco" mysteries).
>
> The page lists nothing more recent than 1997 or so. Would some citizen
> who knows something about these series (or any other series that
> belongs there) care to update the page? I'll be happy to lend support
> to first-time wiki writers.
>
> optime valete
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42565 From: Rubrius Erasimus Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
I completely concur with this...

Vibius Livius Rufinus, brand new member, rethinking his decision...

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Lance Frizzell-Reynolds
<lereynol@...> wrote:
>
> It's not so much what I have seen today but what I have seen over
the
> past week.
>
> I think I was a little extreme in my email, I would never leave
Nova
> Roma as a whole, however I would more than likely leave the
Forum.
> Being a non-traditional University student, I get my fill of
> stupidity on a daily basis and ridiculing others for grammar,
> spelling and other nonsense is right up there, qualifying as the
> Pontiff of stupidity.
>
> Thank you for the encouragement, I think I needed that more than
> anything. The Religio Romana Forum is the only other thing I have
to
> compare this Forum to when it comes to Nova Roma, and the Religio
> Romana forum is quite impressive!
>
Servius Apollonius Leo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42566 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius GalerÂ…Â…Now BACK ON TOPIC
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 11:55:49PM -0000, Timothy P. Gallagher wrote:
> Salve Romans
>
> The Petitio actionis of Domitius Constantinus Fuscus against Caius
> Minucius Scaevola is now before the courts. Thus it is not an
> appropriate issue to be discussed in this forum.
>
> Its adjudication will take place off this list.
>
> If you want to comment on it privately fine but the issue is now
> OFF TOPIC for the main list of Nova Roma.

That's interesting. Will there be any other issues that will become OFF
TOPIC at your whim, Praetor? Or is this OFF TOPIC issue somehow more OFF
TOPIC than all the hundreds of OFF TOPIC issues discussed here on a
monthly basis? What makes it so, pray tell?

Could it be that it's unpleasant to you to have this travesty of justice
remain in the public eye rather than hidden away on a private list (in
which, you may note, I will not be participating)? Does this whole
lash-up smell too much of collusion for you to be comfortable with
having a bright light shining on it? I wonder.

I'll posit a situation, naming no names; let me know if you recognize
any of the characters in the play:

An incapable fool, who nonetheless wishes to be thought A Man of
Consequence, makes a habit of attacking any positive proposals that
come up on a list - since, in his own eyes (and, he hopes, in the
eyes of fools similar to himself), this makes him look strong and
brave. When someone steps up and exposes his game, he is outraged
and scandalized: how _dare_ they attack the very thing he lives for!
He does, however, have a card up his sleeve; since the rules of the
list on which this happens are many, conflicting, and can be
interpreted in an infinity of ways, he appeals to a newly-hatched
list moderator - who, incidentally, has yet to make his first kill
here, and thus show his newly-acquired power.

[gasp] LOOK UP! There, in the sky - covering it from horizon to
horizon! Is it a bird? Is it a plane? (Don't be silly; there was no
such thing as planes in Ancient Rome, and birds aren't that big.)
No, it's the MOS MAIORUM - tottering, but supported by centuries of
justice - all crying "DE MINIMIS NON CURAT LEX!" And that great
scroll, being wheeled in from off-stage - is that the LEX SALICIA
IVDICIARIA? Why, yes, it is - and scrolling across it endlessly
(requires Internet Explorer version 5 or higher) is a marquee,
proclaiming "A praetor can dismiss a petitio actionis if and only if
one of the following cases applies: ... c. The claim is
incongruent".

But no! The just-created moderator is deaf and blind to all these
blandishments; the smell of blood is in his nostrils, and this sweet
scent is irresistible. Tally ho, his reputation as a merciless
slayer, erm, defender of justice shall be made - the tenuous
connection of the situation to actual justice be damned! CHARGE!!!

(Good enough for a pot-boiler; it'll play in Paducah, anyway. Let's see,
where did I put my publisher's address...)

Meanwhile, a quiz for anyone who cares:

1) How much respect for Nova Roman law has everyone gained from this
psycho-(and I use the word in its full meaning)drama? More importantly,
how many people here feel that justice will be served - as opposed to
their time being wasted in some reenactment of "Roma: The Game" - if
they should be accused by some random idiot with a grudge?

2) How much confidence and trust have you gained - or, perhaps, lost -
in the impartiality of those who are supposed to defend your rights?
(Please remember to restrict those negative values to greater than
-2147483646 (IIRC); your Pentium may revolt and crash if you exceed
INT_MAX.)

3) Is anyone convinced, yet, that voting as a popularity context has its
flaws? Perhaps in the future, giving consideration to a candidate's
*demonstrated ability* or at least *qualifications* for a given position
would make sense, eh? I'm just sayin'.

3.5) What _is_ the speed of a coconut-laden African Sparrow? (Heck, as
long as I've got you answering questions... I've always been curious.)


In short - as far as I'm concerned, discussion of this travesty is
welcome and more than welcome - and I do believe that I've got as much
(or more) right to say so as anyone else here. Unless, that is, all OFF
TOPIC discussion - that is, anything other than discussion of Ancient
Rome - is forbidden, Praetor. Is that what you're saying? Or was this
some attempt to bully people into stopping uncomfortable discussion by
vague and undefined threats? Good going, if so. Shows what Nova Roma is
in for until the next election.


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Aquila non captat muscas.
The eagle doesn't capture flies.
-- N/A
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42567 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salve -

On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 08:43:18AM -0500, Annia Minucia Marcella wrote:
> Salvete,
>
> I agree with my brethren, Caius Minucius Scaevola, on this one. That whole
> thing seems a little inane. First of all, this is the internet and neither
> one of them are public figures. They are just people speaking in a Yahoo
> Discussion Group.

I wondered if anybody would spot that particular joker in the deck. I
mean, accusing *anyone* of damaging Fuscus' dignity or reputation is
just a bit /outre/...

--------------------------------------------------------------------
ROSALIND Where learned you that oath, fool?

TOUCHSTONE Of a certain knight that swore by his honour they
were good pancakes and swore by his honour the
mustard was naught: now I'll stand to it, the
pancakes were naught and the mustard was good, and
yet was not the knight forsworn.

[ ... ]

TOUCHSTONE Stand you both forth now: stroke your chins, and
swear by your beards that I am a knave.

CELIA By our beards, if we had them, thou art.

TOUCHSTONE By my knavery, if I had it, then I were; but if you
swear by that that is not, you are not forsworn: no
more was this knight swearing by his honour, for he
never had any; or if he had, he had sworn it away
before ever he saw those pancakes or that mustard.

- Wm. Shakespeare, "As You Like It"
--------------------------------------------------------------------

> This is more of a matter of having the moderators cut down
> on people flaming each other. I mean if someone insulting someone else is
> grounds for some sort of tribunal then it seems to me that there ought to be
> one every week.
>
> But if this matter must be resolved, I think they ought to fight it out in a
> ring. It'd be a lot more entertaining, and less time consuming. Perhaps mud
> could be involved....

I prefer heavy artillery at thirty paces, myself. So much cleaner, and
there's never any contention over who won and who lost...


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Libertas inaestimabilis res est.
Liberty is a thing beyond all price.
-- Corpus Iuris Civilis: Digesta
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42568 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Unladen Swallows
Salve,

An Ethiopian Swallow ( Hirundo aethiopica ) will probably do about 40-50
MPH. Hard to measure that though.

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Benjamin A. Okopnik" <ben@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galer..Now BACK ON TOPIC


>>
> 3.5) What _is_ the speed of a coconut-laden African Sparrow? (Heck, as
> long as I've got you answering questions... I've always been curious.)
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42569 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
M. Hortensia C. Minucio Scaevolae spd;
Duelling, now that would be excellent. How I adored my
foils, my saber & my Fencing master;-) (an Olympic coach) Scaevola,
how did Romans solve such insults?
vale
Hortensia Maior
>
> I prefer heavy artillery at thirty paces, myself. So much cleaner,
and
> there's never any contention over who won and who lost...
>
>
> Vale,
> Caius Minucius Scaevola
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Libertas inaestimabilis res est.
> Liberty is a thing beyond all price.
> -- Corpus Iuris Civilis: Digesta
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42570 From: Semiramis Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
I, too, being a new member, was surprised at all this. Then, I recollected the various wars on the Highlander lists in 1999, the routine flaming on the Lexx lists in 2002, and the Pagan-Wiccan lists today throwing impotence spells at each other the moment the word "fluffbunny" is used, to mention a few. In that case, this must be pretty normal stuff, eh?

I wanna see knives on the Senate steps on the Ides of March, citizens. Et tu, Brutus?

Semmie Septemdecim *teasing*
----- Original Message -----
From: Rubrius Erasimus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 6:41 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)


I completely concur with this...

Vibius Livius Rufinus, brand new member, rethinking his decision...

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Lance Frizzell-Reynolds
<lereynol@...> wrote:
>
> It's not so much what I have seen today but what I have seen over
the
> past week.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42571 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:

> In a message dated 3/9/2006 3:40:45 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> lereynol@... writes:
> I am new to Nova Roma and the statement below and the many that I
> have seen on this list are petty, childish and are beginning to make me
> rethink my belonging to this group.
> Oh please don't do that. You are just in the Forum on a bad day. There is
> actually a lot of good to gained here. You will find people so dedicated to
> Roman ideals that they pledge
> an oath to see them carried out. You will find clubs dedicated to various
> aspects of Roman life with very knowledgeable members, usually able to answer
> questions about Rome and life in Rome, if they cannot they will steer you to
> someone who can.
>
> When it comes to petty behavior the old Roman Republic wasn't much different.

Um -- you do remember what happened to the old Roman Republic, don't you?

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42572 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
In a message dated 3/9/2006 7:17:10 PM Pacific Standard Time,
semmie17@... writes:
and the Pagan-Wiccan lists today throwing impotence spells at each other the
moment the word "fluffbunny" is used, to mention a few.
They do what?

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42573 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
M. Lucretius Agricola to new citizens in particular, many greetings.


I have said before that the worst mistake a new citizen can make is to
jump straight into the Main List. Doing so is like arriving in a new
city and going straight to the courthouse. You risk finding yourself
in the middle of a "trial of the century" with no way to get a handle
on the background issues.

I urge all new citizens to visit the (peaceful, moderated) NewRoman
list at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newroman/ where experienced
citizens are waiting to answer your questions or in any other way help
you get your bearings in our Res Publica.

I assure you that many good things go on "in" Nova Roma that do not
appear here, on this Main List.

optime valete in pace deorum!



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Rubrius Erasimus" <gillins@...> wrote:
>
> I completely concur with this...
>
> Vibius Livius Rufinus, brand new member, rethinking his decision...
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Lance Frizzell-Reynolds
> <lereynol@> wrote:
> >
> > It's not so much what I have seen today but what I have seen over
> the
> > past week.
> >
> > I think I was a little extreme in my email, I would never leave
> Nova
> > Roma as a whole, however I would more than likely leave the
> Forum.
> > Being a non-traditional University student, I get my fill of
> > stupidity on a daily basis and ridiculing others for grammar,
> > spelling and other nonsense is right up there, qualifying as the
> > Pontiff of stupidity.
> >
> > Thank you for the encouragement, I think I needed that more than
> > anything. The Religio Romana Forum is the only other thing I have
> to
> > compare this Forum to when it comes to Nova Roma, and the Religio
> > Romana forum is quite impressive!
> >
> Servius Apollonius Leo
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42574 From: Lance Frizzell-Reynolds Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: NewRoman List
Thank you for the suggestion and I have joined.

On Mar 9, 2006, at 10:23 PM, M. Lucretius Agricola wrote:

> M. Lucretius Agricola to new citizens in particular, many greetings.
>
>
> I have said before that the worst mistake a new citizen can make is to
> jump straight into the Main List. Doing so is like arriving in a new
> city and going straight to the courthouse. You risk finding yourself
> in the middle of a "trial of the century" with no way to get a handle
> on the background issues.
>
> I urge all new citizens to visit the (peaceful, moderated) NewRoman
> list at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newroman/ where experienced
> citizens are waiting to answer your questions or in any other way help
> you get your bearings in our Res Publica.
>
> I assure you that many good things go on "in" Nova Roma that do not
> appear here, on this Main List.
>
> optime valete in pace deorum!
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Rubrius Erasimus" <gillins@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > I completely concur with this...
> >
> > Vibius Livius Rufinus, brand new member, rethinking his decision...
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Lance Frizzell-Reynolds
> > <lereynol@> wrote:
> > >
> > > It's not so much what I have seen today but what I have seen over
> > the
> > > past week.
> > >
> > > I think I was a little extreme in my email, I would never leave
> > Nova
> > > Roma as a whole, however I would more than likely leave the
> > Forum.
> > > Being a non-traditional University student, I get my fill of
> > > stupidity on a daily basis and ridiculing others for grammar,
> > > spelling and other nonsense is right up there, qualifying as the
> > > Pontiff of stupidity.
> > >
> > > Thank you for the encouragement, I think I needed that more than
> > > anything. The Religio Romana Forum is the only other thing I have
> > to
> > > compare this Forum to when it comes to Nova Roma, and the Religio
> > > Romana forum is quite impressive!
> > >
> > Servius Apollonius Leo
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
> Fall of the roman empire The roman empire
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42575 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 02:58:53AM -0000, Maior wrote:
> M. Hortensia C. Minucio Scaevolae spd;
> Duelling, now that would be excellent. How I adored my
> foils, my saber & my Fencing master;-) (an Olympic coach) Scaevola,
> how did Romans solve such insults?

As far as I know, Romans didn't have duels [1]; that started later, at
least the duel judicial. That's what I recall from my reading back when
I was learning to fence, myself. The history of fencing is closely
intertwined with dueling, and it can be gruesomely fascinating. Neither
George Silver, whom I greatly admired at the time, nor Di Grassi [2]
mention Romans except as proponents of both cut and thrust, and a quick
Google search brings up the following:

(From "The Catholic Encyclopedia",
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05184b.htm)

Duelling was unknown to the civilized nations of antiquity. The contests
of the Roman gladiators were not, like the duels of today, a means of
self-defence, but bloody spectacles to satisfy the curiosity and cruelty
of an effeminate and degenerate people. On the other hand the custom of
duelling existed among the Gauls and Germans from the earliest era, as
Diodorus Siculus (Biblioth. history Lib. V, ch. xxviii), Velleius
Paterculus (Histor. rom., II, cxviii) and others relate.

That was pretty much my own take, little as I know about it, so that
concludes our program for the evening.


[1] Heck, for all I know, they may have sued each other to death. Hey,
maybe lawsuit-caused boredom was the reason that the Empire died out!

[2] From his modestly named "Giacomo DiGrassi His True Art of Defense,
plainly teaching by infallible Demonstrations, apt Figures and perfect
Rules the manner and form how a man without other Teacher or Master may
handle all sorts of Weapons aswell offensive as defensive: With a
Treatise Of Deceit or Falsing: And with a way or Means by private
Industry to obtain Strength, Judgement, and Activity (First written in
Italian by the Foresaid Author, And Englished by I.G. gentleman.)"


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate.
Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily.
-- Principle known as Occam's Razor, "used for example in physics."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42576 From: Semiramis Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
Wands at thirty paces!
----- Original Message -----
From: QFabiusMaxmi@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)


In a message dated 3/9/2006 7:17:10 PM Pacific Standard Time,
semmie17@... writes:
and the Pagan-Wiccan lists today throwing impotence spells at each other the
moment the word "fluffbunny" is used, to mention a few.
They do what?

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
Fall of the roman empire The roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42577 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
In a message dated 3/9/2006 7:17:45 PM Pacific Standard Time,
dicconf@... writes:
Um -- you do remember what happened to the old Roman Republic, don't you?
Yea, exactly as Polybios predicted.

I agree that this a petty law suit. However Equitius Cato makes a good
point. If we are going to pick the laws we like and ignore the ones we don't like,
we aren't going very far are we?

That said, I have been saying for years, the Lex Salica needs to be revised,
and the definitions of Iniuria, clarified. Defamation of one's character
really happens here everyday, based on this lex, which was actually written for
face to face encounters, never as internet law. Dragging someone into the
quaestiones every time this happens, will soon be counterproductive. NR will be
paralyzed. Hopefully, now this unhappy incident will give impetus to revise the
lex, and rewrite some of its sections.
I believe that Municius simply verbalized what many citizens were feeling
about at the time.
Once you remove such free thinking and expression from the Forum, you pretty
much have driven a stake through NR's heart.
If I believe that a person is wasting the bandwidth and post time here in NR,
I certainly should have the right to express my opinion.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42578 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Romans and duels (Was ex officio etc)
In a message dated 3/9/2006 6:59:54 PM Pacific Standard Time,
rory12001@... writes:
How did Romans solve such insults?
Romans didn't duel, they usually sued each other, or hired people to take
care of the problem with a sharp knife. Romans believed that duels were
barbaric.

Gauls were especially notorious for this. Get two drunken Celts together and
there is going to be a fight! Somebody will insult somebody. If one of the
duelists killed the other, he had to pay blood money to the loser's family.
Diodoros claims Celts were "full of pride...impatient of affronts and
revengeful of injuries."
He also goes on to tell us that often they fought at meals, the best piece of
meat was reserved for the "bravest." Often Celts disagreed on who the
bravest was! So they drew spathas and decided it. Strabo says "These people have
no self control...you will have them ready to face danger, even if they have
only their own strength and courage."

Germans, Tacitus tells us, had the blood feud "enemy that shed my blood."
Such a person could only be fought and killed by the person making the claim
against. If someone else killed that person, the claimant had every right to
duel him to avenge the insult, since the chance to do so with the original
insulter had been lost.
Must have made battles between the German tribes very interesting.
Later in the Principate we have cases of dueling but usually between
Germanics, Hispanics or Gauls, all who were Roman citizens at the time duels were
fought. Looks like a bad habit they brought along to the Empire.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42579 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-09
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
In a message dated 3/9/2006 8:05:14 PM Pacific Standard Time,
semmie17@... writes:
Wands at thirty paces!

Oh, now I have heard everything! Most historians I talk to have a very
interesting take on Gardner's innovation.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42580 From: Elizabeth Price Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
I actually disagree. I've been a member of Nova Roma for a whole of two days now and although I am absolutely clueless as to the root of the problem, I can barely tear myself away from my inbox. Maybe it's morbid curiosity?

Aula Claudia Vopisca

Rubrius Erasimus <gillins@...> wrote: I completely concur with this...

Vibius Livius Rufinus, brand new member, rethinking his decision...

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Lance Frizzell-Reynolds
<lereynol@...> wrote:
>
> It's not so much what I have seen today but what I have seen over
the
> past week.
>
> I think I was a little extreme in my email, I would never leave
Nova
> Roma as a whole, however I would more than likely leave the
Forum.
> Being a non-traditional University student, I get my fill of
> stupidity on a daily basis and ridiculing others for grammar,
> spelling and other nonsense is right up there, qualifying as the
> Pontiff of stupidity.
>
> Thank you for the encouragement, I think I needed that more than
> anything. The Religio Romana Forum is the only other thing I have
to
> compare this Forum to when it comes to Nova Roma, and the Religio
> Romana forum is quite impressive!
>
Servius Apollonius Leo



---------------------------------
Brings words and photos together (easily) with
PhotoMail - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42581 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
Salvete Omnes,

Of all the pagan/wiccan lists I've been on, that has actually never
happened.

Valete,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: QFabiusMaxmi@...
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
>
>
> In a message dated 3/9/2006 7:17:10 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> semmie17@... writes:
> and the Pagan-Wiccan lists today throwing impotence spells at each other
> the
> moment the word "fluffbunny" is used, to mention a few.
> They do what?
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
> Fall of the roman empire The roman empire
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42582 From: rocknrockabilly Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Religio Romana and other Pagan links
Salvete omnes cives,

I found this site with Nova Roma listed as one of the pagan revival
organizations (or, should we say, nation), along with other pagan
groups, including a group reviving the Etruscan religion. I believe
some of you may already be familiar with this site. If you are not, it
is worth surfing it.

http://www.ladywinterwolf.fcpages.com/paganism.html

Valete bene,

T.A.S.Flamininus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42583 From: duy mai Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: NewRoman List
hmmm... that's a good idea. i'm also a new citizen (as of the other day in fact). the volume of negativity filling my mailbox was definately a turn off. i wouldn't blame Nova Roma as it seems like an internet phenomena. i'll give the NewRoman list a try and see how it goes.

by the way, i made a point not to check my speeling. ;-)

Marcus Marius Aculeo.



Lance Frizzell-Reynolds <lereynol@...> wrote:
Thank you for the suggestion and I have joined.

On Mar 9, 2006, at 10:23 PM, M. Lucretius Agricola wrote:

> M. Lucretius Agricola to new citizens in particular, many greetings.
>
>
> I have said before that the worst mistake a new citizen can make is to
> jump straight into the Main List. Doing so is like arriving in a new
> city and going straight to the courthouse. You risk finding yourself
> in the middle of a "trial of the century" with no way to get a handle
> on the background issues.
>
> I urge all new citizens to visit the (peaceful, moderated) NewRoman
> list at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newroman/ where experienced
> citizens are waiting to answer your questions or in any other way help
> you get your bearings in our Res Publica.
>
> I assure you that many good things go on "in" Nova Roma that do not
> appear here, on this Main List.
>
> optime valete in pace deorum!
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Rubrius Erasimus" <gillins@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > I completely concur with this...
> >
> > Vibius Livius Rufinus, brand new member, rethinking his decision...
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Lance Frizzell-Reynolds
> > <lereynol@> wrote:
> > >
> > > It's not so much what I have seen today but what I have seen over
> > the
> > > past week.
> > >
> > > I think I was a little extreme in my email, I would never leave
> > Nova
> > > Roma as a whole, however I would more than likely leave the
> > Forum.
> > > Being a non-traditional University student, I get my fill of
> > > stupidity on a daily basis and ridiculing others for grammar,
> > > spelling and other nonsense is right up there, qualifying as the
> > > Pontiff of stupidity.
> > >
> > > Thank you for the encouragement, I think I needed that more than
> > > anything. The Religio Romana Forum is the only other thing I have
> > to
> > > compare this Forum to when it comes to Nova Roma, and the Religio
> > > Romana forum is quite impressive!
> > >
> > Servius Apollonius Leo
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
> Fall of the roman empire The roman empire
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42584 From: Semiramis Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: On Effeminate and Degenerate Romans (was: Ex Officio Tiberius Gale
Salvete -

The Catholic Encyclopedia has a very curious and problematic definition of the Romans in this paragraph below. Since when did the Roman spectators become an "effeminate and degenerate people"? Those two adjectives imply that the Romans, also by being "unchristian" in their naughty penchant for throwing Christians to lions, were both less than manly <excisio>. I know this is the Catholic Encyclopedia and thus understand the implied audience of its readership, but does anyone else find this adjectival combination irksome?

If the Catholic Encyclopedia is correct, then, are football (British and American), soccer, and hockey fans "effeminate and degenerate" people because they enjoy "bloody spectacles"? I've always found these sports to be a natural continuum of gladiatorial games. How curious...

Valete,
Semmie Septemdecim
----- Original Message -----
From: Benjamin A. Okopnik noted:

As far as I know, Romans didn't have duels [1]; that started later, at
least the duel judicial. That's what I recall from my reading back when
I was learning to fence, myself. The history of fencing is closely
intertwined with dueling, and it can be gruesomely fascinating. Neither
George Silver, whom I greatly admired at the time, nor Di Grassi [2]
mention Romans except as proponents of both cut and thrust, and a quick
Google search brings up the following:

(From "The Catholic Encyclopedia",
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05184b.htm)

Duelling was unknown to the civilized nations of antiquity. The contests
of the Roman gladiators were not, like the duels of today, a means of
self-defence, but bloody spectacles to satisfy the curiosity and cruelty
of an effeminate and degenerate people. On the other hand the custom of
duelling existed among the Gauls and Germans from the earliest era, as
Diodorus Siculus (Biblioth. history Lib. V, ch. xxviii), Velleius
Paterculus (Histor. rom., II, cxviii) and others relate.

That was pretty much my own take, little as I know about it, so that
concludes our program for the evening.


[1] Heck, for all I know, they may have sued each other to death. Hey,
maybe lawsuit-caused boredom was the reason that the Empire died out!

[2] From his modestly named "Giacomo DiGrassi His True Art of Defense,
plainly teaching by infallible Demonstrations, apt Figures and perfect
Rules the manner and form how a man without other Teacher or Master may
handle all sorts of Weapons aswell offensive as defensive: With a
Treatise Of Deceit or Falsing: And with a way or Means by private
Industry to obtain Strength, Judgement, and Activity (First written in
Italian by the Foresaid Author, And Englished by I.G. gentleman.)"


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate.
Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily.
-- Principle known as Occam's Razor, "used for example in physics."


SPONSORED LINKS Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
Fall of the roman empire The roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42585 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Q. Fabio Maximo salutem dicit

I am sure the historians have interesting things to say. I wonder
what the religious studies scholars have to say about Gardner? For
that matter I wonder what they have to say about Nova Roma and our
efforts to rebuild the Religio Romana.

Vale;

Modianus

On 3/9/06, QFabiusMaxmi@... <QFabiusMaxmi@...> wrote:
> In a message dated 3/9/2006 8:05:14 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> semmie17@... writes:
> Wands at thirty paces!
>
> Oh, now I have heard everything! Most historians I talk to have a very
> interesting take on Gardner's innovation.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42586 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: a.d. VI Id. Mar.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem VI Idus Martias; haec dies comitialis est.


"About the same time the Carthaginian commanders briefly addressed
their forces. They pointed out to them that in the event of victory in
the battle they would be fighting afterwards for Sicily, but that if
defeated they would have to fight for their own country and their
homes, and bade them take this to heart and embark. When all readily
did as they were ordered, as their general's words had made clear to
them the issues at stake, they set to sea in a confident and menacing
spirit. The commanders when they saw the enemy's order adapted their
own to it. Three-quarters of their force they drew up in a single
line, extending their right wing to the open sea for the purpose of
encircling the enemy and with all their ships facing the Romans. The
remaining quarter of their force formed the left wing of their whole
line, and reached shoreward at angle with the rest. Their right wing
was under the command of the same Hanno who had been worsted in the
engagement near Agrigentum. He had vessels for charging and also the
swiftest quinqueremes for the outflanking movement. The left wing was
in charge of Hamilcar, the one who commanded in the sea-battle at
Tyndaris, and he, fighting as he was in the centre of the line, used
in the fray the following stratagem. The battle was begun by the
Romans who, noticing that the Carthaginian line was thin owing to its
great extent, delivered an attack on the centre. The Carthaginian
centre had received Hamilcar's orders to fall back at once with the
view of breaking the order of the Romans, and, as they hastily
retreated, the Romans pursued them vigorously. While the first and
second squadrons thus pressed on the flying enemy, the third and
fourth were separated from them, the third squadron towing the
horse-transports, and the triarii remaining with them as a supporting
force. When the Carthaginians thought they had drawn off the first and
second squadrons far enough from the others, they all, on receiving a
signal from Hamilcar's ship, turned simultaneously and attacked their
pursuers. The engagement that followed was a very hot one, the
superior speed of the Carthaginians enabling them to move round the
enemy's flank as well as to approach easily and retire rapidly, while
the Romans, relying on their sheet strength when they closed with the
enemy, grappling with the ravens every ship as soon as it approached,
fighting also, as they were, under the very eyes of both the Consuls,
who were personally taking part in the combat, had no less high hopes
of success. Such then was the state of the battle in this quarter.
At one and the same time Hanno with the right wing, which had held its
distance in the first attack, sailed across the open sea and fell upon
the ships of the triarii, causing them great embarrassment and
distress. Meanwhile that part of the Carthaginian force which was
posted near the shore, changing their former formation and deploying
into line with their prows facing the enemy, attacked the vessels
which were towing the horse-transports. Letting go their tow-lines
this squadron met and engaged the enemy. Thus the whole conflict
consisted of three parts, and three sea-battles were going on at a
wide distance from each other. As the respective forces were in each
case of equal strength owing to their disposition at the outset, the
battle also was fought on equal terms. However, in each case things
fell out as one would expect, when the forces engaged are so equally
matched. Those who had commenced the battle were the first to be
separated, for Hamilcar's division was finally forced back and took to
flight. Lucius was now occupied in taking the prizes in tow, and
Marcus, observing the struggle in which the triarii and
horse-transports were involved, hastened to their assistance with such
of the ships of the second squadron as were undamaged. When he
reached Hanno's division and came into conflict with it, the triarii
at once took heart, though they had had much the worst of it, and
recovered their fighting spirit. The Carthaginians, attacked both in
front and in the rear, were in difficulties, finding themselves
surrounded, to their surprise, by the relieving force, and giving way,
they began to retreat out to sea. Meanwhile both Lucius, who was by
this time sailing up and observed that the third squadron was shut in
close to the shore by the Carthaginian left wing, and Marcus, who had
now left the horse-transports and triarii in safety, hastened together
to the relief of this force which was in grave peril; for the state of
matters now was just like a siege, and they all would evidently have
been lost if the Carthaginians had not been afraid of the ravens and
simply hedged them in and held them close to the land instead of
charging, apprehensive as they were of coming to close quarters. The
Consuls, coming up rapidly and surrounding the Carthaginians, captured
fifty ships with their crews, a few managing to slip out along shore
and escape. The separate encounters fell out as I have described, and
the final result of the whole battle was in favour of the Romans. The
latter lost twenty-four sail sunk and the Carthaginians more than
thirty. Not a single Roman ship with its crew fell into the enemy's
hands, but sixty-four Carthaginian ships were so captured." -
Polybius, Histories 1.28-29

On this day in 241 B.C., the First Punic War ended. By the winter of
243/2 the Roman treasury was exhausted. However the Romans had
sufficiently recovered from the debacle of 249 to build yet another
fleet. The Senate passed a measure taxing themselves, the monies to be
repayable in case of victory. 200 war ships were built.

In 241 the fleet of 200 quinquiremes which was placed in command of
Gaius Lutatius Catulus were sent to renew the blockade of Lilybaeum.
Th Romans appeared off the coast of Sicily in the summer and the
surprised Punic fleet was forced to sail home, allowing the Romans to
take the harbor at Drepana (Trapani), where he installed siege-works
and blockaded the city, and the roadsteads near Lilybaeum. Meanwhile
he drilled in naval manoeuvers every day.

The Carthaginians managed to reactivate their fleet and send a force
of 170 ships, loaded their ships with grain and sought to relieve
Hamilcar's troops in Eryx. The fleet was out of practice, undermanned
and burdened with supplies for the garrison. The commander, Hanno,
planned to sneak into Eryx, unload the corn to lighten the ships and
take on the mercenary troops of Hamilcar Barca and then seek out the
Roman fleet.

This plan failed. Lutatius got word of the arrival, embarked his best
troops and sailed to the island of Aegusa (Aegates Islands or Egadi
Islands) near Lilybaeum to intercept. At daybreak he saw that the
strong breeze favoured Carthage and that the seas were rough. He was
unsure whether to engage but in the end decided that this would be
preferable to fighting the same force later after it could be
strengthened by Carthage. So upon seeing the enemy at full sail, he
put to sea at once, quickly maneuvering his fleet into a single line
facing the enemy.

Seeing this, the Carthaginians lowered their masts and closed. The
Romans benefited from removal of all heavy equipment from their
vessels and their training now paid off whereas the laden Carthaginian
galleys were difficult to maneuver and their marines merely raw
recruits. The result was that the Carthaginian ships experienced
defeat after defeat. Fifty of their galleys were sunk outright and
seventy captured. The remainder were saved only by a fortuitous change
in wind direction and raised their masts and ran before the wind,
which had veered around, and made their way back. The Romans had taken
nearly 100,000 prisoners of war and Carthage was forced to sue for
peace shortly thereafter.

Thus it was that on March 10, 241 B.C., the Carthaginian relieving
fleet was totally defeated near the Aegates Islands off western
Sicily. Catulus, who had made the decision to attack, shared in the
triumph, though a wound had prevented him from taking part in the
operations. The Carthaginians subsequently crucified the naval
commander Hanno; for the first time in their history, the
Carthaginians had lost control of the sea.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES


Polybius, Battle of Aegates Insulae
(http://www.barca.fsnet.co.uk/aegates.htm)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42587 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: a.d. VI Id. Mar.
C. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

I almost forgot:


CETERVM CENSEO CARTHAGINEM ESSE DELENDAM


Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42588 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Sodalitates
Salvete!

Would leaders of the recognized sodalitates please check the wiki page
at http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/Sodalitates_(Nova_Roma) and update it
where needed?

Optime valete!

M. Lucretius Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42589 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
On 3/9/06, Timothy P. Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
> Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
>
> Condemned, the reus shall be required to present a public
> retraction and apology in order to restore the actor's dignity and
> reputation in one of Nova Roma's official venues within thirty days


Does anyone really believe that an apology by any one or in any venue would
be enough to "restore the actor's dignity"? Do we first have to establish
what dignity or are we all just supposed to assume their was ever any
dignity there in the first place.

Flavia Lucilla Merula

--
> Chaos, confusion, disorder - my work here is done


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42590 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salve, Flavia Lucilla Merula -

On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 02:12:28PM +0000, Kirsteen Wright wrote:
> On 3/9/06, Timothy P. Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
> >
> > Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
> >
> > Condemned, the reus shall be required to present a public
> > retraction and apology in order to restore the actor's dignity and
> > reputation in one of Nova Roma's official venues within thirty days
>
>
> Does anyone really believe that an apology by any one or in any venue would
> be enough to "restore the actor's dignity"? Do we first have to establish
> what dignity or are we all just supposed to assume their was ever any
> dignity there in the first place.

Well, those would be two of the gaping holes in that law - and that's
just in one sentence, mind you. However, there's yet another one - in
the same paragraph, no less - that makes the entire exercise a joke: how
do you prove that your dignity has been damaged as a result of someone's
statement? Even if you assume that the plaintiff has any dignity to
start with, what is the metric by which a decrease in the amount of it
can be measured, and how do you show that it has actually happened?

Unless, of course, you roll up "DIG" as one of the player's stats (3
6-sided dice), and then roll the attack and damage dice for each
complaint... Ah-ha - now it all makes sense!

Here, I'll even lend some to anyone who wants them (requires Perl):


----- dice.pl ------------------------------------------------------
#!/usr/bin/perl -wl
# Created by Ben Okopnik on Sat Nov 17 10:39:44 EST 2001

$die = shift or die "Usage: ", $0 =~ /([^\/]+)$/, " <type_of_die> [how_many]\n";

$botch = $max = 0;

sub roll {
$roll = int rand( $die ) + 1;
$botch++ if $roll == 1;
$max++ if $roll == $die;
$roll;
}

if ( $num = shift ) {
push @dice, roll for 1 .. $num;
$" = " + "; print "@dice = ", eval "@dice";
print "Botches: $botch";
print "Max rolls: $max";
}
else {
print roll;
}
----- dice.pl ------------------------------------------------------


I await the results of the, um, deliberations with bated breath...


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
De gustibus non est disputandum.
That is a matter of taste.
-- N/A
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42591 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
C. Equitius Cato C. Minuciae Scaevolae F. Lucillae Merulae
quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

OK, folks, you have to make a decision: either you believe the
Republic exists or you think it is a role-playing game.

If it is an RPG, then the kind of discussion you're having now does
make sense: there's no real law, no real offices or magistrates, no
real dignity, no real existence outside the nebulous world of the
internet. The discussions of "law" and "politics" and "dignity" are
exercizes in rhetoric and grammar (despite the apparent general
distaste for the usage of proper English, I think there's something to
be said for having a healthy respect for the language if it's your
native tongue) and can be accepted or dismissed at your leisure,
applied or ignored, as they will have no appreciable impact on your
lives whatsoever.

Your choice --- and each of us has that choice, actually.

Valete bene,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Benjamin A. Okopnik" <ben@...> wrote:
>
> Salve, Flavia Lucilla Merula -
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 02:12:28PM +0000, Kirsteen Wright wrote:
> > On 3/9/06, Timothy P. Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
> > >
> > > Condemned, the reus shall be required to present a public
> > > retraction and apology in order to restore the actor's dignity and
> > > reputation in one of Nova Roma's official venues within thirty days
> >
> >
> > Does anyone really believe that an apology by any one or in any
venue would
> > be enough to "restore the actor's dignity"? Do we first have to
establish
> > what dignity or are we all just supposed to assume their was ever any
> > dignity there in the first place.
>
> Well, those would be two of the gaping holes in that law - and that's
> just in one sentence, mind you. However, there's yet another one - in
> the same paragraph, no less - that makes the entire exercise a joke: how
> do you prove that your dignity has been damaged as a result of someone's
> statement? Even if you assume that the plaintiff has any dignity to
> start with, what is the metric by which a decrease in the amount of it
> can be measured, and how do you show that it has actually happened?
>
> Unless, of course, you roll up "DIG" as one of the player's stats (3
> 6-sided dice), and then roll the attack and damage dice for each
> complaint... Ah-ha - now it all makes sense!
>
> Here, I'll even lend some to anyone who wants them (requires Perl):
>
>
> ----- dice.pl ------------------------------------------------------
> #!/usr/bin/perl -wl
> # Created by Ben Okopnik on Sat Nov 17 10:39:44 EST 2001
>
> $die = shift or die "Usage: ", $0 =~ /([^\/]+)$/, " <type_of_die>
[how_many]\n";
>
> $botch = $max = 0;
>
> sub roll {
> $roll = int rand( $die ) + 1;
> $botch++ if $roll == 1;
> $max++ if $roll == $die;
> $roll;
> }
>
> if ( $num = shift ) {
> push @dice, roll for 1 .. $num;
> $" = " + "; print "@dice = ", eval "@dice";
> print "Botches: $botch";
> print "Max rolls: $max";
> }
> else {
> print roll;
> }
> ----- dice.pl ------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> I await the results of the, um, deliberations with bated breath...
>
>
> Vale,
> Caius Minucius Scaevola
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> De gustibus non est disputandum.
> That is a matter of taste.
> -- N/A
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42592 From: Titus Marcius Felix Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Citizens of a republic or players of RPG
Titus Marcius Felix omnibus S.P.D.

Good question presented for the Cato. "We are citizens of a republic or players of RPG".

I believe that I am citizen of a republica!
you ?

Valete bene
Felix


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis
Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42593 From: C·ARMINIVS·RECCANELLVS Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Citizens of a republic or players of RPG
> Titus Marcius Felix wrote:
>
> I believe that I am citizen of a republica!
> you ?

I don't believe that I'm a citizen of a republic! I know that!!!

If I'm wrong, I need to reorganize my ideas and, if it's realy a RPG,
get out!

Vale et Valete
C•ARMINIVS•RECCANELLVS
======================
PROPRAETOR•PROVINCIAE•BRASILIAE
QUAESTOR•NOVAE•ROMAE
"Quousque tandem, Lula, abutere patientia nostra?"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42594 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:22:08PM -0000, Gaius Equitius Cato wrote:
> C. Equitius Cato C. Minuciae Scaevolae F. Lucillae Merulae
> quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> OK, folks, you have to make a decision: either you believe the
> Republic exists or you think it is a role-playing game.

I thought it was the former when I joined - witness the time and effort
I've put into it over the years (I have very little desire to hold
public office, but have contributed my energy when there was a need for
it.) Now, it's becoming the latter - made so by _official acts._ I still
believe that it can return to being a Republic rather than a game, but I
see progressively less hope for it as time goes on.

> If it is an RPG, then the kind of discussion you're having now does
> make sense: there's no real law, no real offices or magistrates, no
> real dignity, no real existence outside the nebulous world of the
> internet.

These are, indeed, the conditions under which I find this entire
proceeding to be occurring.

> The discussions of "law" and "politics" and "dignity" are
> exercizes in rhetoric and grammar (despite the apparent general
> distaste for the usage of proper English, I think there's something to
> be said for having a healthy respect for the language if it's your
> native tongue) and can be accepted or dismissed at your leisure,
> applied or ignored, as they will have no appreciable impact on your
> lives whatsoever.

I agree: all these discussions of "law" are nothing more that rhetoric -
unless that law serves the ends of justice.

I disagreed (although I did not respond at the time) with your statement
that "law was the difference between us and barbarians"; they had law as
well. It's just that their law consisted of "me strong man; me get all
furs and women, and the rest of you get crap!" The thing that you meant,
perhaps, was *justice* - and laws that serve it. This is what we here in
Nova Roma do _not_ have. What we do have is a mess of conflicting
verbiage that can be abused by anyone who wants to play that game
(although I'm sure that many of the people who wrote the laws had the
best interests of the Republic at heart, they failed abysmally in many
or most cases.) Even more to the point: if the greatest punishment that
the "law" of Nova Roma can mete out is to expel someone from a group
that consists mostly of legal wrangling, then the law has no teeth. So,
what is "real" and what is "play", amice?

What I've believed about Nova Roma all along is still true: making the
membership into something of value - e.g., promoting interesting
discussions about AR, exploring history and ancient thought and their
applicability to modern life, etc. - would *make* those laws meaningful
(and perhaps, once there was value to be had and lost, people would care
enough to propose *and* vote for laws that were something other than a
way to get one's name in the Tabularium.) However, this does not seem to
be happening... and the hopes that I once had for Nova Roma are
dissipating like smoke.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Quod licet Jovi, non licet bovi.
What Jupiter may do, the ox may not.
(I.e., what is permitted for a high-ranking person isn't permitted for everybody.
Cf. aliis si licet, tibi non licet..)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42595 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: CITIZENS OF A REPUBLIC
Severus Reccanello omnibusque sal.

Salve amice, I feel just like you, but I am quite sure that Nova Roma is a Republic and we are its citizens, so, there, is no need to quit, or even to think about quitting... We better devote our efforts to change everything that we consider must be changed, ad majorem Romae gloriae!

Vale, et valete optime,

M•IVL•SEVERVS

--
_______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.

Powered by Outblaze
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42596 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: De petitione: sundry comments
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

I hope you'll permit me to comment on various things
which have come up in discussion. It may take me a
while. :)

As M. Octavius has noted, criticism of the praetor for
accepting this petitio is misplaced. Praetores are
only allowed to dismiss petitiones on three very
limited grounds.

M. Minucius suggests that this one could have been
dismissed on the grounds of incongruence. The example
of incongruence given in the lex Salicia is this:
'"Ticius must be expelled from Nova Roma because he is
bearded" is an incongruent claim, for it is not
supported by law, precedent or common sense'.

I think this example makes it perfecly clear what sort
of situations incongruence covers. It does not cover a
situation in which the petitio accuses someone of
doing something which is quite explicitly stated in a
lex to be a criminal offence. The praetor would have
been quite wrong to dismiss the petitio on this basis.

The lex Salicia judiciaria makes it very clear that
where there is any evidence that an offence may have
been committed the matter should go to court. The
praetores can only strike out a petitio where it
absolutely cannot stand up for a second.

I would remind C. Minucius that he himself complained
a while ago that when he himself filed a petitio the
praetor struck it out on the basis that it contained
insufficiently strong evidence. Scaevola said, quite
rightly, that this was a decision for the court and
not for the praetor: there was some evidence, and that
should have been enough. So too here there is some
evidence, and the court must decide whether it stands
up. Not wishing to prejudice the case I shan't make
any comment on whether the evidence in this particular
petitio is more or less substantial than the evidence
in the other one. The point is simply that in both
cases the evidence is sufficient to meet the very low
threshold set by law.

Whether that threshold is set at the right level is an
entirely different matter. There must always be some
balancing. If the threshold is set too high praetores
are able to make unilateral and perhaps arbitrary
decisions which could deny people redress. If it is
set too low praetores have no power to strike out
ridiculous and time-wasting claims which are bound to
fail.

I'm not entirely certain myself whether the threshold
is currently set in the right place. My instinct is to
look at Roman practice, but the problem is that our
current judicial arrangements are a hybrid of civil
and criminal procedures from ancient times and that
makes it very difficult to know exactly which ancient
rules are relevant. I would be inclined, at the
moment, to say that the threshold for allowing a
petitio should be left where it is but that the
praetor should be given more scope, and more time, to
try to effect a resolution without convening a court.
Certainly in civil proceedings in the old republic the
praetor had considerably scope for trying to resolve
disputes extrajudicially before finally having to
decide whether to convene a court or not: under our
current system the praetor is given very little
freedom to do this.

Questions have also been raised about whether libel
should be dealt with under our law in the way it is. I
think this is a very important point. The lex Salicia
poenalis, under which this petitio has been brought,
is a code of criminal law. Libel was never a criminal
offence during the Roman republic, and it is not a
criminal offence in any modern legal system that I
know anything about. Defamation and harm to reputation
are private matters between two individuals and do not
justify criminal sanctions. The offence of calumnia
should, in my view, be removed from the lex poenalis.
I have said this consistently since the days when the
lex was being drafted.

I would go further and suggest that modern concepts of
defamation even in civil law are alien to republican
Roman law and should not be adopted by our republic.
The nearest equivalent, as Q. Maximus has pointed out,
was injuria, which was a very different animal indeed.
Injuria was based not on the idea of a false statement
which harms a person's reputation but on the idea of
an unjustified interference with a person's rights in
such a way as to cast aspertions on his merit. Thus,
for example, injuria might occur where A unreasonably
blocked B's path and thus prevented him from
exercising his right of free movement. It might occur
where A struck B physically and thus offended B's
dignity (regardless of any physical harm caused). It
might also occur where A insulted B, and this is where
the overlap with modern defamation is found, but even
here the rules were rather different. To my mind we
should at least consider replacing modern-style
defamation with Roman injuria in our law.

Finally, some people have made some very good points
about the definition of the offence. I have to be
careful here not to comment on the case itself, but
some general points can be made. It's true that in
order to prove calumnia the plaintiff must prove that
the statements harmed his reputation. This can be
difficult. The defendant may well be able to find
witnesses who will say that their opinion of the
plaintiff's reputation is in no way diminished by the
statements which were made. It's also true, though not
so many people have commented on this, that the
plaintiff must prove that the statements were false.
This can also be difficult and can end up causing even
more harm to the plaintiff's reputation than was
caused by the original statements, because it gives
the defendant a stage on which to produce any evidence
he can find to back up his original assertions.

But the people who are pointing out these features of
the law seem to be confused. They seem to be
suggesting that because the plaintiff has to prove
things which are difficult to prove therefore the law
is absurd. On the contrary, it seems to me that these
features provide a valuable protection for the
defendant. They also seem to think that the plaintiff
in this case has not proved the things he needs to
prove (in particular that his reputation has been
harmed), and that therefore the petitio should be
dismissed. This brings us back to the point I began
with. The plaintiff is not expected to prove his case
before he is even allowed to go to court: that would
make the praetor judge and jury in the case and would
make any further trial redundant. All the plaintiff
has to show at this stage is that there is some
evidence supporting his claim, however flimsy. He has
done that. Now he will have to actually prove his
claim, and the court will decide whether he succeeds.
That is right and proper.

So we really must make clear distinctions between
these three questions:
- Was the praetor right to accept the petitio?
- Is the plaintiff right to claim he has been
calumniated?
- Should the law on defamation and / or the acceptance
of petitiones be changed?

The answer to the first question is undoubtedly 'yes'.
The answer to the second question is for the court to
decide. The answer to the third question is open for
argument as a matter of public interest. I would
suggest that the third question is the only one which
it is worth spending any time discussing in this forum.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42597 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Salvete, omnes.

On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 04:44:50PM +0000, A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
>
> M. Minucius suggests that this one could have been
> dismissed on the grounds of incongruence. The example
> of incongruence given in the lex Salicia is this:
> '"Ticius must be expelled from Nova Roma because he is
> bearded" is an incongruent claim, for it is not
> supported by law, precedent or common sense'.
>
> I think this example makes it perfecly clear what sort
> of situations incongruence covers. It does not cover a
> situation in which the petitio accuses someone of
> doing something which is quite explicitly stated in a
> lex to be a criminal offence. The praetor would have
> been quite wrong to dismiss the petitio on this basis.

Oh, please. Come *off* it, will you? The example illustrates one single
case of incongruence; nowhere does it claim to cover _all_ possible
cases of incongruence. If it did, then the only cases which could be
seen as incongruent were those that used the exact formula in the
example, and there's nobody named 'Ticius' here.

This case is incongruent because my statements were a) neither false nor
defamatory, and b) cannot be proven to have damaged the plaintiff's
dignity - even if he is assumed to possess any.

> The lex Salicia judiciaria makes it very clear that
> where there is any evidence that an offence may have
> been committed the matter should go to court. The
> praetores can only strike out a petitio where it
> absolutely cannot stand up for a second.

Really? Please show where the "absolutely cannot stand up for a second"
standard is defined.

> I would remind C. Minucius that he himself complained
> a while ago that when he himself filed a petitio the
> praetor struck it out on the basis that it contained
> insufficiently strong evidence.

Errr, no. What I said was that the Praetor who was responsible for
prosecuting the case ran out, and the Nova Roma justice system failed,
egregiously, to correct for that problem. I also said that that Praetor
had previously been suborned by political considerations to argue that I
had to prove damage in a case involving a death threat. Please do not
distort my statements in order to make your position seem stronger; it
simply makes all your other statements suspect.


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Claris maiorum exemplis.
After the forefathers' brilliant example.
-- Part of the inscription on the House of Nobility, Riddarhuset, in Stockholm.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42598 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: a.d. VI Id. Mar.
A. Apollonius C. Equitio omnibusque sal.

> CETERVM CENSEO CARTHAGINEM ESSE DELENDAM

Ego censeo Carthaginem jam satis deletam esse. ;)



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42599 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
C. Equitius Cato C. Minuciae Scaevolae quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

I am firmly of the opinion that the Republic exists, and furthermore
that I am a citizen of it.

I empathize with you regarding the points you bring up; they strike,
as I tried to describe, at the very heart of what it is we think we
are doing here. Although I have had my hand in a few "real"
activities (the new coin is almost ready --- woohoo!), I also freely
admit that I find myself enthralled by the actions of government and
politics; this is a great deal of what makes Nova Roma real to me.
That they are by definition relatively intangible by virtue of the
*current* situation is secondary to me --- for better or worse I act
as if the government and legal system under which the Republic
operates really *do* matter, because someday, they just might.

Yes, our law is a mess. How do we fix it?

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42600 From: druidfoot02 Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Neoplatonist Fellowship
Group for the discussion and practice of Neoplatonism as a spiritual
path.

Neoplatonism is a form of Idealistic Monism. Plotinus, the founder of
Neoplatonism, taught the existence of a single, ineffable and
transcendent 'One', from which emanated the cosmos, to which, we are
irresitibly drawn and by a process of mystical ascent we can return.

"Our thought cannot grasp the One as long as any other image remains
active in the soulÂ…To this end, you must set free your soul from all
outward things and turn wholly within yourself, with no more leaning
to what lies outside, and lay your mind bare of ideal forms, as
before of the objects of sense, and forget even yourself, and so come
within sight of that One." Plotinus

Emphasis is on Neoplatonism as a continuous independent tradition.

Keywords: Plato, Platonism, Neoplatonism, Monism, Monistic Idealism,
Plotinus, Porphery, Sallustius, Amelius, Iamblichus, Theodorus of
Asine, Aedesius, Theon, Hypatia, Plutarch of Athens, Proclus,
Simplicus, Damascius, Olympiodorus, Plethon, Cosimo de Medici,
Marsilio Ficino, Pico della Mirandolla, Giordano Bruno, Thomas Taylor.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Neoplatonist_Fellowship/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42601 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Annia Minucia Marcella wrote:

> Salvete Omnes,
>
> Of all the pagan/wiccan lists I've been on, that has actually never
> happened.

Perhaps you haven't been on the ri...I mean, the wrong ones. I was
actually challenged to a duel on one. (I pointed out that as the
challenged party I had the choice of weapons, and I'd qualified for my
Expert badge with the M-1 carbine. Silence ensued.)

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42602 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: a.d. VI Id. Mar.
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, gaiusequitiuscato wrote:

> C. Equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> I almost forgot:
>
> CETERVM CENSEO CARTHAGINEM ESSE DELENDAM
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato

Are hyou trying to cause a diplomatic incident with the Tunisians?

-- Publius Livius Triarius
ducking and running...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42603 From: Stefanie Beer Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TG
Salve M. Lucreti Agricola!
But it´s so delightfully melodramatic and entertaining!
I quit watching soap operas and read the main list, instead! ;-)
But seriously: I really enjoy the Main List although I´m still a relatively
recent citizen. The tantrums, the interesting debates (I really liked the
one about religion lately)and the possibility to participate!
I like this diversity - to me it feels like a day out in the streets when
you hear folks talking about chicken flu (or whatever it is called in
English), the latest news, the latest neighbourly gossip, literature,
theatre, the outrage about the latest strikes....in short of life in all its
aspects.
Vale!
L.Flavia Lectrix

PS: of course I´m on the newroman-list, too. ;-))



-------Originalmeldung-------

Von: M. Lucretius Agricola
Datum: 03/10/06 04:23:34
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)

M. Lucretius Agricola to new citizens in particular, many greetings.


I have said before that the worst mistake a new citizen can make is to
jump straight into the Main List. Doing so is like arriving in a new
city and going straight to the courthouse. You risk finding yourself
in the middle of a "trial of the century" with no way to get a handle
on the background issues.

I urge all new citizens to visit the (peaceful, moderated) NewRoman
list at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newroman/ where experienced
citizens are waiting to answer your questions or in any other way help
you get your bearings in our Res Publica.

I assure you that many good things go on "in" Nova Roma that do not
appear here, on this Main List.

optime valete in pace deorum!



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Rubrius Erasimus" <gillins@...> wrote:
>
> I completely concur with this...
>
> Vibius Livius Rufinus, brand new member, rethinking his decision...
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Lance Frizzell-Reynolds
> <lereynol@> wrote:
> >
> > It's not so much what I have seen today but what I have seen over
> the
> > past week.
> >
> > I think I was a little extreme in my email, I would never leave
> Nova
> > Roma as a whole, however I would more than likely leave the
> Forum.
> > Being a non-traditional University student, I get my fill of
> > stupidity on a daily basis and ridiculing others for grammar,
> > spelling and other nonsense is right up there, qualifying as the
> > Pontiff of stupidity.
> >
> > Thank you for the encouragement, I think I needed that more than
> > anything. The Religio Romana Forum is the only other thing I have
> to
> > compare this Forum to when it comes to Nova Roma, and the Religio
> > Romana forum is quite impressive!
> >
> Servius Apollonius Leo
>







Yahoo! Groups Links








[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42604 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Benjamin A. Okopnik wrote:

> Salve, Flavia Lucilla Merula -
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 02:12:28PM +0000, Kirsteen Wright wrote:
>> On 3/9/06, Timothy P. Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
>>>
>>> Condemned, the reus shall be required to present a public
>>> retraction and apology in order to restore the actor's dignity and
>>> reputation in one of Nova Roma's official venues within thirty days
>>
>> Does anyone really believe that an apology by any one or in any venue would
>> be enough to "restore the actor's dignity"? Do we first have to establish
>> what dignity or are we all just supposed to assume their was ever any
>> dignity there in the first place.
>
> Well, those would be two of the gaping holes in that law - and that's
> just in one sentence, mind you. However, there's yet another one - in
> the same paragraph, no less - that makes the entire exercise a joke: how
> do you prove that your dignity has been damaged as a result of someone's
> statement? Even if you assume that the plaintiff has any dignity to
> start with, what is the metric by which a decrease in the amount of it
> can be measured, and how do you show that it has actually happened?

The older form required the retraction as well as the apology. ("I said
that Venator runs rabbits. I apologize and believe he does _not_ run
rabbits.") If possible, it had to be before the same audience that heard
the original insult.

Some insults are obscure enough to cause puzzlement over whether a tort
exists ("Lao Chang can't remember his Natal Eight") but there also exists
a large class of statements which are _prima facie_ slanderous -- or I
guess that would be libellous, in the case of e-mail. "Tomasus Navis got
Katie Domus pregnant out of wedlock and then abandoned her", for instance,
is such a statement: any court would understand it as a gross insult
without any need to prove that it was such. Since the case currently
under discussion is in the hands of the judicial authorities, it would be
improper for me to offer an opinion as to whether it is _prima facie_
offensive to a degree justifying legal action.

-- Publius Livius Triarius
sociologist, not lawyer. I don't even play one on TV.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42605 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Semiramis wrote:

> I, too, being a new member, was surprised at all this. Then, I
> recollected the various wars on the Highlander lists in 1999, the
> routine flaming on the Lexx lists in 2002, and the Pagan-Wiccan lists
> today throwing impotence spells at each other the moment the word
> "fluffbunny" is used, to mention a few. In that case, this must be
> pretty normal stuff, eh?

Unfortunately, it seems to be -- I recollect getting zapped by impatient
(and less tolerant) sysops on an Atlantis list for rejecting the validity
of "channelled" "information" and on a science-fiction fan list for
maintaining that pedophilia was no more acceptable when scholars practiced
it than when priests practiced it. Well, not for simply expressing those
ideas, but for maintaining them firmly for some weeks against others who
were sympathetic to these practices. Various other set-tos were ended
less drastically. (BTW "channelled" information is that which is "sent"
to a recipient from a disembodied source -- essentially, the modern term
for "information" acquired in an old-fashioned seance.)

All justified, one might say; but every bit of bandwidth and time for
composition and reading they took up was not being used for the intended
purposes of the group. That, it seems to me, is the real objection to
using an e-list to carry on personal battles. And judging by my own
experience and the reports of others, f/e/u/d/i/n aggressive assertion of
one's case does not rally converts to one's side. The people who are on
the list to discuss and advance its declared purpose are simply annoyed by
all the squabbling. Even if one hits the "delete" key after reading the
first few lines, it consumes time which most readers would rather spend on
constructive matters.

> I wanna see knives on the Senate steps on the Ides of March, citizens.
> Et tu, Brutus?

Magnetic sweeps are out of period, aren't they?

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42606 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Sodalitates
Salve M. Lucretius Agricola!

The Head of both Sodalitas Militarium and Sodalitas Egressus, Marcus
Minucius Audens is on a trip and will probably be home tomorrow. I
have cc this message to him. He might want an offer of each Sodalitas
to do this as he uses web-tv.

>Salvete!
>
>Would leaders of the recognized sodalitates please check the wiki page
>at http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/Sodalitates_(Nova_Roma) and update it
>where needed?
>
>Optime valete!
>
>M. Lucretius Agricola

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Senator, Censorius et Consularis
Accensus GFBM, Scriba Censoris GEM
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42607 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
----- Original Message -----
From: "dicconf" <dicconf@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor


"Tomasus Navis got
> Katie Domus pregnant out of wedlock and then abandoned her", for instance,
> is such a statement: any court would understand it as a gross insult
> without any need to prove that it was such. Since the case currently
> under discussion is in the hands of the judicial authorities, it would be
> improper for me to offer an opinion as to whether it is _prima facie_
> offensive to a degree justifying legal action.
>

Salve,

I agreed with you until here. How is it an insult, let alone a gross one?

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42608 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
A. Apollonius C. Minucio omnibusque sal.

> Oh, please. Come *off* it, will you? The example
> illustrates one single
> case of incongruence; nowhere does it claim to cover
> _all_ possible
> cases of incongruence. If it did, then the only
> cases which could be
> seen as incongruent were those that used the exact
> formula in the
> example, and there's nobody named 'Ticius' here.

Indeed: the example doesn't illustrate every possible
example, but it gives a clear indication of what sort
of situation the provision is meant to cover. Let me
quote it again:

'"Ticius must be expelled from Nova Roma because he is
bearded" is an incongruent claim, for it is not
supported by law, precedent or common sense.'

The part about beards is not the most important part:
the most important part is the part which says that
the claim is incongruent because "it is not supported
by law, precedent, or common sense". So clearly a
claim which is supported by none of those three things
will be incongruent. It is not altogether clear
whether all three of those things have to be present
in order for a claim to be congruent. I would say not:
the first claim under any given lex will always be
unsupported by precedent, so if precedent were always
required then all petitiones would be incongruent. I
think the most natural interpretation is this: if a
claim is supported by law, or by precedent, or by
common sense, then it is congruent.

The point of the example is surely this: the reason
the claim against Ticius is incongruent is because
even if the allegation (that Ticius is bearded) were
true, it would not be illegal and there would be no
grounds for expelling the bearded Ticius from Nova
Roma. That's what it means when it says that the claim
is not supported by law, precedent, or common sense:
the claim against Ticius should be dismissed because
law, precedent, and common sense all say that what
Ticius is being accused of is not a crime. That's what
'incongruence' means here. It allows the praetor to
strike out petitiones which have no basis in law.

> This case is incongruent because my statements were
> a) neither false nor
> defamatory, and b) cannot be proven to have damaged
> the plaintiff's
> dignity - even if he is assumed to possess any.

This is a totally impossible reading of the law.
You're saying that the petitio should be dismissed
because it has not been proven that your statements
were false or defamatory or that they harmed Domitius
Constantinus' reputation. In other words, he hasn't
proved that you're guilty. You're right, he hasn't.
That's what happens, or doesn't happen, in the trial.
The purpose of the trial is to give the accuser an
opportunity to prove his accusation. Your argument is,
it seems, that he should not be given that opportunity
unless he has already proved the accusation. If he has
to prove that you're guilty before there can be a
trial, what's left to do at the trial itself? Just
prove it all over again? The function of the praetor
is not to decide whether you're guilty or not, it's to
decide whether there's any basis for having a trial to
find out whether you're guilty. If the praetores start
striking out petitiones just because the allegations
contained in them haven't been proven then no petitio
will ever get to court, and then the judicial will be
even less effective than you say it is now.

If you're right that your statements were neither
false nor defamatory (and you know my view on that),
then Fuscus will lose the case. And if you're right
that they did not harm his reputation, then he'll lose
the case. But neither of these is a reason why the
claim should be struck out before even getting to
trial. Striking out, as is clear from the example, is
only available where even if the accusation were true
it would not merit any punishment. The question
whether the accusation *is* true is not for the
praetor to decide.

> > I would remind C. Minucius that he himself
> complained
> > a while ago that when he himself filed a petitio
> the
> > praetor struck it out on the basis that it
> contained
> > insufficiently strong evidence.
>
> Errr, no. What I said was that the Praetor who was
> responsible for
> prosecuting the case ran out, and the Nova Roma
> justice system failed,
> egregiously, to correct for that problem. I also
> said that that Praetor
> had previously been suborned by political
> considerations to argue that I
> had to prove damage in a case involving a death
> threat.

It's the second point I'm referring to. The praetor in
that case was persuaded that before your petitio could
be accepted you had to produce proof. And that's what
you're arguing here: that this petitio should not be
allowed to go to trial until Fuscus proves that you're
guilty. The time for proof is the trial. At this stage
all that's needed is some evidence which, just
conceivably, might perhaps constitute proof. Likewise
in your case all that was needed was for you to say
that a threat had been made and show some evidence of
it. Once you had shown that much, the praetor should
have allowed the petitio without demanding any further
proof. His rejection then was illegal and a rejection
now would have been illegal too.



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42609 From: Stefanie Beer Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: Citizens of a republic or players of RPG
My sentiments exactly!
L.Flavia Lectrix

-------Originalmeldung-------

Von: C·ARMINIVS·RECCANELLVS
Datum: 03/10/06 17:09:47
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: Citizens of a republic or players of RPG

> Titus Marcius Felix wrote:
>
> I believe that I am citizen of a republica!
> you ?

I don't believe that I'm a citizen of a republic! I know that!!!

If I'm wrong, I need to reorganize my ideas and, if it's realy a RPG,
get out!

Vale et Valete
C•ARMINIVS•RECCANELLVS
======================
PROPRAETOR•PROVINCIAE•BRASILIAE
QUAESTOR•NOVAE•ROMAE
"Quousque tandem, Lula, abutere patientia nostra?"







Yahoo! Groups Links








[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42610 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Teaching Children
Can anyone recommend any books or resources for teaching children Latin?
--
>|P. Dominus Antonius|<
Tony Dah m

Oderint dum metuant - Cicero
Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42611 From: Stefanie Beer Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Roman celebrities in Medicine
L.Flavia Lectrix SPD

I thought I´d share with you something amusing I stumbled on during my
training in anaesthesiology.
In the hospital I currently work in - and most other hospitals in Germany I
might add, the machines for "passing gas" and thus are used for general
anaesthesia with volatile narcotics - are from the firm Draeger.
And they are almost all named after Romans: there´s Sulla, Trajan, Cato,
Tiro, Fabius - only the latest model veers from this path: it´s named Primus
Latin nonetheless ;-))
Even their first ventilator had a Latin word as name: Servo.

Valete!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42612 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Sodalitates
> Salue, M. Lucreti Agricola, et saluete, omnes!
>
> Salvete!
>
> Would leaders of the recognized sodalitates please check the wiki page
> at http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/Sodalitates_(Nova_Roma) and update it
> where needed?
>
> ATS: I attempted to correct the Latin in three places, including my title
> in Musarum, but couldn¹t locate the save changes (or preview) button. The
> name of the cooking sodalitas is still wrong; it should be Sodalitas Coquorum
> et Cerevisiae Coctorum (and on the regular sodalities page); Under Egressus,
> civites should be corrected to cives, and my title in Musarum should be
> coryphaea. The rest of the text looks fine.
>
> Optime valete!
>
> M. Lucretius Agricola
>
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
> Moderatrix Sodalitatis Latinitatis
> Coryphaea Sodalitatis Musarum
>
>
>


>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42613 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Sodalitates
Salve Aula Tullia,

Take a look at it now. I just made the changes you listed below.

The "Edit" link is at the top of the page. The "preview" and "save"
links are at the bottom of the page.

Vale,

-- Marinus

A. Tullia Scholastica wrote:

>>Salue, M. Lucreti Agricola, et saluete, omnes!
>>
>>Salvete!
>>
>>Would leaders of the recognized sodalitates please check the wiki page
>>at http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/Sodalitates_(Nova_Roma) and update it
>>where needed?
>>
>> ATS: I attempted to correct the Latin in three places, including my title
>>in Musarum, but couldn¹t locate the save changes (or preview) button. The
>>name of the cooking sodalitas is still wrong; it should be Sodalitas Coquorum
>>et Cerevisiae Coctorum (and on the regular sodalities page); Under Egressus,
>>civites should be corrected to cives, and my title in Musarum should be
>>coryphaea. The rest of the text looks fine.
>>
>>Optime valete!
>>
>>M. Lucretius Agricola
>>
>>
>>Vale, et ualete,
>>
>>A. Tullia Scholastica
>>Moderatrix Sodalitatis Latinitatis
>>Coryphaea Sodalitatis Musarum
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42614 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Sodalitates
> Salue, Censor Marine, et saluete, omnes!
>
> Salve Aula Tullia,
>
> Take a look at it now. I just made the changes you listed below.
>
> ATS: Plurimas gratias! Everything is A-OK now.
>
> The "Edit" link is at the top of the page. The "preview" and "save"
> links are at the bottom of the page.
>
> ATS: I used the edit function, and made the changes, but couldn¹t find
> the preview/save buttons...maybe they hid on me.
>
> Vale,
>
> -- Marinus
>
> Vale, et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica wrote:
>
>>> >>Salue, M. Lucreti Agricola, et saluete, omnes!
>>> >>
>>> >>Salvete!
>>> >>
>>> >>Would leaders of the recognized sodalitates please check the wiki page
>>> >>at http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/Sodalitates_(Nova_Roma) and update it
>>> >>where needed?
>>> >>
>>> >> ATS: I attempted to correct the Latin in three places, including my
>>> title
>>> >>in Musarum, but couldn¹t locate the save changes (or preview) button. The
>>> >>name of the cooking sodalitas is still wrong; it should be Sodalitas
>>> Coquorum
>>> >>et Cerevisiae Coctorum (and on the regular sodalities page); Under
>>> Egressus,
>>> >>civites should be corrected to cives, and my title in Musarum should be
>>> >>coryphaea. The rest of the text looks fine.
>>> >>
>>> >>Optime valete!
>>> >>
>>> >>M. Lucretius Agricola
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>Vale, et ualete,
>>> >>
>>> >>A. Tullia Scholastica
>>> >>Moderatrix Sodalitatis Latinitatis
>>> >>Coryphaea Sodalitatis Musarum
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42615 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
>
> Our first opportunity to play Roman law! What an opportunity.
> Everyone get your dice out, and your players handbook and you too can
> "roll up" a character in Dungeons and Dragons: The Nova Roma edition.

You took the words right outnof my mouth. Except I was thinking that in reference to your co-Consul
Pompeia's veto of Praetor Galerius's edict because he used the word "must".
Vale,
Diana Octavia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42616 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salve Annia Minucia,

> Well you made more mistakes than that. I didn't point out the grammar and
> punctuation mistakes.

As someone who spends her entire day speaking in 2 languages, neither of which is my mother tongue,
I really take offence to your email correcting Fuscus's English.

NR is an INTERNATIONAL organization. We have many people here whose mother tongue is not English and
*we want it this way*. This is not a club for US citizens who are living inside of a xenophobic
bubble*

If you don't like the content of Fuscus's email, say so. Pointing out his English errors is simply
petty and insults your intelligence.

vale,
Diana
*people living in bubbles for health reasons are welcome here too....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42617 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salve,

----- Original Message -----
From: "Diana Octavia Aventina" <diana@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor


> Salve Annia Minucia,
>
>> Well you made more mistakes than that. I didn't point out the grammar and
>> punctuation mistakes.
>
> As someone who spends her entire day speaking in 2 languages, neither of
> which is my mother tongue,
> I really take offence to your email correcting Fuscus's English.
>

That's nice. He didn't. And the corrections didn't pertain to you, so no
need to take offense.

> NR is an INTERNATIONAL organization. We have many people here whose mother
> tongue is not English and
> *we want it this way*. This is not a club for US citizens who are living
> inside of a xenophobic
> bubble*
>

That really doesn't have anything to do with what I posted, but thanks for
the commentary.


> If you don't like the content of Fuscus's email, say so. Pointing out his
> English errors is simply
> petty and insults your intelligence.
>

No where in my e-mail did I say I didn't like the content of his e-mail. I
specifically said it had nothing to do with the content of his e-mail. I
don't consider correcting someone's spelling to be petty or insulting, as it
had no bearing on his argument, nor did I proceed to berate him for his
mistakes. I simply pointed out the errors, and he took it the way I intended
it.

Stop trying to cause animosity.

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42618 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Teaching Children
Salve,

I would be interested in this as well.

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "P. Dominus Antonius" <marsvigilia@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 3:28 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Teaching Children


> Can anyone recommend any books or resources for teaching children Latin?
> --
>>|P. Dominus Antonius|<
> Tony Dah m
>
> Oderint dum metuant - Cicero
> Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42619 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Sodalitates
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
<fororom@...> wrote:
>

> > ATS: I attempted to correct the Latin in three places,
including my title
> > in Musarum, but couldn¹t locate the save changes (or preview)
button. The

Salve!

Yes, it takes a bit of getting used to. After you click the "edit" tab
you have to scroll down *past a view of the page* to get to the edit
window. The preview and save buttons are *under that*!

A nice feature that makes life a bit easier is that each *section*
also has an 'edit' link. *That* link opens a much smaller edit, only
the section in question. I suggest using those links when you see them.

optime vale

Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42620 From: A C Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Teaching Children
Salve,
There are ample resources for the instruction of children the Latin language. Here are some sources which provide time-tested materials for children and adults: 1) Our Lady of Victory Home School resources: http://www.olvs.org/ShopCart/InvList.aspx?a=54 2) Seton Home School resources: http://www.setonbooks.com/search.php?author=&publisher=&age=&grade=&subject=Latin&authorid=&userSearchString=&orderby=subject&offset=0 3) Bolchazy-Carducci Publications:
http://www.bolchazy.com/index.php?cat=latin&sub=main

I hope this helps. Good luck!!!

Take care,
Anthony





Annia Minucia Marcella <annia@...> wrote:
Salve,

I would be interested in this as well.

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "P. Dominus Antonius" <marsvigilia@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 3:28 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Teaching Children


> Can anyone recommend any books or resources for teaching children Latin?
> --
>>|P. Dominus Antonius|<
> Tony Dah m
>
> Oderint dum metuant - Cicero
> Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42621 From: A C Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: On Effeminate and Degenerate Romans (was: Ex Officio Tiberius
Salvete,
I think what the Catholic Encyclopaedia is alluding to is the Christian (and pre-Christian Greco-Roman) view that those who live for the passions have become "effeminate" and not "manly" or virtuous. Years ago, a Latin professor told me that the word "virtue" comes from the Latin word "vir" which means "man". Used here, it refers to one who is strong in self-control and living in accord with higher principles of living, such as those who live by Christian morality (which is a religious code) or the ethics of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle (which is natural law based). In the ancient Greco-Roman world and in the subsequent Christian period, the man who could live according to these higher principles was considered manly or virtuous. On the other hand, the man who could not live that way was considered effeminate and unable to control his passions.
I hope this explanation helps somewhat. It is not my intention to offend anyone with this explanation but only to contribute what I've learned about the philosophy of the ancient world.

Take care,
Anthony


Semiramis <semmie17@...> wrote:
Salvete -

The Catholic Encyclopedia has a very curious and problematic definition of the Romans in this paragraph below. Since when did the Roman spectators become an "effeminate and degenerate people"? Those two adjectives imply that the Romans, also by being "unchristian" in their naughty penchant for throwing Christians to lions, were both less than manly <excisio>. I know this is the Catholic Encyclopedia and thus understand the implied audience of its readership, but does anyone else find this adjectival combination irksome?

If the Catholic Encyclopedia is correct, then, are football (British and American), soccer, and hockey fans "effeminate and degenerate" people because they enjoy "bloody spectacles"? I've always found these sports to be a natural continuum of gladiatorial games. How curious...

Valete,
Semmie Septemdecim
----- Original Message -----
From: Benjamin A. Okopnik noted:

As far as I know, Romans didn't have duels [1]; that started later, at
least the duel judicial. That's what I recall from my reading back when
I was learning to fence, myself. The history of fencing is closely
intertwined with dueling, and it can be gruesomely fascinating. Neither
George Silver, whom I greatly admired at the time, nor Di Grassi [2]
mention Romans except as proponents of both cut and thrust, and a quick
Google search brings up the following:

(From "The Catholic Encyclopedia",
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05184b.htm)

Duelling was unknown to the civilized nations of antiquity. The contests
of the Roman gladiators were not, like the duels of today, a means of
self-defence, but bloody spectacles to satisfy the curiosity and cruelty
of an effeminate and degenerate people. On the other hand the custom of
duelling existed among the Gauls and Germans from the earliest era, as
Diodorus Siculus (Biblioth. history Lib. V, ch. xxviii), Velleius
Paterculus (Histor. rom., II, cxviii) and others relate.

That was pretty much my own take, little as I know about it, so that
concludes our program for the evening.


[1] Heck, for all I know, they may have sued each other to death. Hey,
maybe lawsuit-caused boredom was the reason that the Empire died out!

[2] From his modestly named "Giacomo DiGrassi His True Art of Defense,
plainly teaching by infallible Demonstrations, apt Figures and perfect
Rules the manner and form how a man without other Teacher or Master may
handle all sorts of Weapons aswell offensive as defensive: With a
Treatise Of Deceit or Falsing: And with a way or Means by private
Industry to obtain Strength, Judgement, and Activity (First written in
Italian by the Foresaid Author, And Englished by I.G. gentleman.)"


Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate.
Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily.
-- Principle known as Occam's Razor, "used for example in physics."


SPONSORED LINKS Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test
Fall of the roman empire The roman empire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42622 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Sodalitates
> Salue, Agricola, et saluete, omnes bonae uoluntatis!
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
> <fororom@...> wrote:
>> >
>
>>> > > ATS: I attempted to correct the Latin in three places,
> including my title
>>> > > in Musarum, but couldn¹t locate the save changes (or preview)
> button. The
>
> Salve!
>
> Yes, it takes a bit of getting used to. After you click the "edit" tab
> you have to scroll down *past a view of the page* to get to the edit
> window. The preview and save buttons are *under that*!
>
>
> ATS: No wonder...my browser will not scroll beyond where it says ÂŒpowered
> by mediawiki¹/about Nova Roma/etc. If this button is below that, I can¹t
> access it.
>
> A nice feature that makes life a bit easier is that each *section*
> also has an 'edit' link. *That* link opens a much smaller edit, only
> the section in question. I suggest using those links when you see them.
>
> ATS: I did use that just now‹I missed one correction on Latinitas: the
> name of the sodalitas is sodalitas Latinitatis, not sodalitas Latinitas. I
> had no difficulty correcting this, but couldn¹t save it because the button is
> inaccessible.
>
> optime vale
>
> Agricola
>
> Optime uale et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42623 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Sodalitates
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
<fororom@...> wrote:
...


> > ATS: No wonder...my browser will not scroll beyond where it
says ÂŒpowered
> > by mediawiki¹/about Nova Roma/etc. If this button is below that,
I can¹t
> > access it.
> >


You should be able to see it then. At the bottom of the edit window
you should see sonething like this:

======================

| *this is the edit window*
|____________

Summary: ___________________
|_| This is a minor edit |_| Watch this page

| SAVE PAGE | | SHOW PREVIEW | |SHOW CHANGES | Cancel | Editing help
(opens in new window)

Please note that all contributions to NovaRoma are considered to be
released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.2 (see
Project:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be
edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it
from a public domain or similar free resource. DO NOT SUBMIT
COPYRIGHTED WORK WITHOUT PERMISSION!


==========================

Those 3 buttons are not easy to spot: they are white and match the
background. I have trouble spotting them myself.

Of course it is possible that for some reason your browser isn't
putting the buttons on the page at all, but I think that unlikely.

Optime vale

Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42624 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-03-10
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
---Salvete Aventina Quiritibus:


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Diana Octavia Aventina" <diana@...>
wrote:
>
> >
>
> You took the words right outnof my mouth. Except I was thinking
that in reference to your co-Consul
> Pompeia's veto of Praetor Galerius's edict because he used the
word "must".
> Vale,
> Diana Octavia

LOL!

He did? Right out of your mouth! No way!

Pray tell Aventina, was this 'before' or 'after' you yanked your
foot from it?

Did I issue an intercessio 'soley' because the word 'must' was
used...and that's it? I know you can speak English, but just to
clarify....can you 'read' it?

No matter.

Next year, you may take your past magisterial records, and present
them to the Senate and People, and gain their approval of your
Consulship, and then you can show us all how it's 'really' done.
That's what you may do. Actions speak louder than words.

In the meantime, I will do what I feel is best for all citizens and
ensure equal access to their legal options...even if a few insist on
carrying things to paper-thin extremes. I'm kind of 'weird' like
that, I admit...wanting to safeguard that we're all treated
equally... I didn't write these laws, but as long as they
remain 'laws', a citizen's access to claims under their language
can't be unreasonably restricted. Maybe I wasn't held enough as a
child...something like that...yeah, that's my excuse for this
bizarre behaviour :>)

I stand by for my mark in grammar and punctuation.

Pompeia




>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42625 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salve, C. Equitius Cato amice, et salvete omnes.

On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 06:24:31PM -0000, Gaius Equitius Cato wrote:
> C. Equitius Cato C. Minuciae Scaevolae quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salve et salvete.
>
> I am firmly of the opinion that the Republic exists, and furthermore
> that I am a citizen of it.
>
> I empathize with you regarding the points you bring up; they strike,
> as I tried to describe, at the very heart of what it is we think we
> are doing here. Although I have had my hand in a few "real"
> activities (the new coin is almost ready --- woohoo!), I also freely
> admit that I find myself enthralled by the actions of government and
> politics; this is a great deal of what makes Nova Roma real to me.
> That they are by definition relatively intangible by virtue of the
> *current* situation is secondary to me --- for better or worse I act
> as if the government and legal system under which the Republic
> operates really *do* matter, because someday, they just might.

Well, amice, this is perhaps one of the differences between us. Not to
say that you're wrong, but my concept of what is real versus what is
imaginary is a little different.

It seems to me that one of the central ideas informing the direction in
which Nova Roma has been moving - which has, in my opinion, produced
several disastrous results - is the principle of "acting as if"; many of
us have been acting as if Nova Roma's recreation of Ancient Roma in the
modern age was an accomplished fact, lands, power, laws, magistrates and
all. Mind you, the principle itself is valid and powerful: act as though
you have already are that which you wish to become, and the world will
often bend itself into pretzels to accomodate you. This is certainly a
tool in my own toolbox, and works well... but it requires a finely-tuned
judgement, mostly of your own beliefs and capabilities. After all, no
matter how much you act as if you could fly by flapping your arms, the
laws of gravity and aerodynamics will continue to maintain their
opposing viewpoints - and challenging those in a real-world test would
prove painful or even fatal.

In my opinion, doing the above as a group - especially a group in which
there's not an *overwhelming* sense of cooperation - is certain to prove
just as painful (and perhaps fatal, at least to the existence of the
group). It is also my opinion that this is precisely what Nova Roma has
been doing - and we're now reaping what we have, perhaps unconsciously,
sown.

> Yes, our law is a mess. How do we fix it?

Take a deep breath, drop back 15 yards, and revisit the decisions that
have been made from that motivation. I don't know if surgery quite
*this* radical is necessary, but here's a possible approach: scrap the
laws (yes, including the constitution), and start afresh. Elect a few
magistrates who seem best-suited to resolving the set of problems that
are valid for the milieu in which the group operates (i.e., it's a
discussion group on the Net; therefore, all that's needed - at most - is
a small number of moderators.) Solve the problems of today, and let
tomorrow take care of itself.

Over the years, I've participated in many groups on the Net; some of
these have been around for many years, and are still going strong. None
of the long-term survivors have anything beyond a basic set of rules for
participation; certainly, none of them have a huge hierarchy of
officials - and yet, some of them organize group conventions, cruiseship
trips, group funds to send outstanding members on teaching trips around
the world [1]... This is not only possible but happens on a regular
basis. What we've got now, as a result of the way that we've been doing
things, is lots of smoke, noise, and argument, and almost no action
(this is not to disparage the Magna Mater project, etc. - but I believe
that those are accomplished *in spite* of the existing structure instead
of as a result of it.)

I really do believe that it's time to reassess the way things are done
here. Otherwise, in my opinion, this group is moribund - much as all of
us may wish otherwise.



[1] All of the above are events occuring in the first group that came to
my mind, news:comp.lang.perl.misc - but there are certainly others who
do just as much or more. None of it requires anything more than willing
cooperation from a large majority of the membership; reading their FAQs
and giving strong consideration to the rules which let them survive and
flourish may not be a bad idea.

Vale et valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
His ego nec metas rerum nec tempora pono: imperium sine fine dedi.
(For the achievment of these people I fix neither spatial boundries or
temporal limits: I have given them empire without end.)
-- Virgil, "Aeneid"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42626 From: S Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salvete,

On 3/10/06, dicconf <dicconf@...> wrote:
>
> [excision]
>
> The older form required the retraction as well as the apology. ("I said
> that Venator runs rabbits. I apologize and believe he does _not_ run
> rabbits.") If possible, it had to be before the same audience that heard
> the original insult.
>
> [excision]
>
> -- Publius Livius Triarius
> sociologist, not lawyer. I don't even play one on TV.
>

Actually, I'd take the imagery as a wild flight of fancy ,-)

Ever since leaving military service,
and becoming older, slower and fatter,
Venator runs for no one or no thing!

He does, however, go out and shoot the rabbits 8-P

=========================================
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poet

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42627 From: Peter Bird Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Teaching Children
Salve!

I would recommend "Minimus" for smaller children.

SPPB



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of P. Dominus Antonius
Sent: 10 March 2006 20:28
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Teaching Children



Can anyone recommend any books or resources for teaching children Latin?
--
>|P. Dominus Antonius|<
Tony Dah m

Oderint dum metuant - Cicero
Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






SPONSORED LINKS


Roman
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Roman+empire&w1=Roman+empire&w2=Ancient
+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+roman+empire
&c=5&s=113&.sig=V_ohQEPlKSUophzoyeKo7A> empire

Ancient
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Roman+empire&w2=Anci
ent+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+roman+emp
ire&c=5&s=113&.sig=qUOMYbt4Zn7Yl_BI9eyvCA> history

Citizenship
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Citizenship+test&w1=Roman+empire&w2=Anc
ient+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+roman+em
pire&c=5&s=113&.sig=i89al2nzLhouXVUtOu-wDQ> test


Fall
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w1=Roman+empir
e&w2=Ancient+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+
roman+empire&c=5&s=113&.sig=cvvUbwFz4SII0tNReHlQkw> of the roman empire

The
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=The+roman+empire&w1=Roman+empire&w2=Anc
ient+history&w3=Citizenship+test&w4=Fall+of+the+roman+empire&w5=The+roman+em
pire&c=5&s=113&.sig=o0D-t5cCQCdxurytCXSC7Q> roman empire





_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Nova-Roma
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



_____



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42628 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Annia Minucia Marcella wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "dicconf" <dicconf@...>
>
> "Tomasus Navis got
>> Katie Domus pregnant out of wedlock and then abandoned her", for instance,
>> is such a statement: any court would understand it as a gross insult
>> without any need to prove that it was such.
>
> Salve,
>
> I agreed with you until here. How is it an insult, let alone a gross one?

It asserts:

1) He impregnated a lady friend out of wedlock, a shameful action;

2) He then abandoned her, compounding the infamy.

A possible defense would be, that his culture does not regard illegitimate
births as reflecting disgrace on the parents, and/or that Katie is
independently wealthy and does not require child support. But such a
defense would have to be proven, while the insulting nature of the
original statement is clear to any "person of normal understanding".

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42629 From: daylily218 Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Teaching Children Latin
Salvete, omnes. I've been teaching kids of all ages
Latin for years, albeit at different levels and with
different approaches. For my younger elementary students,
say third and fourth graders, my approach was more a concentration
on English words of Latin derivation, of which there is no shortage!
The kids' weekly spelling list would consist of words derived from
a theme of Latin words: counting in Latin, animals in Latin, parts
of the body, Latin verbs, Latin nouns, and I could go on and on.
The focus would be on the English derivatives, and these served not only
as mere spelling words but as incredible vocabulary builders. And yes,
when we got to sex in counting there was the requisite little kid
giggles, but I'd always require them to come up with the English words
derived from the Latin, in this case sex: so up went hands and we
had sextet, sextuplets, etc. For older students, for teaching them
actual Latin, my focus was on the kids reading the Latin, though we
had to get the pronunciation down so as to read aloud frequently.
Hands down, I found Ecce Romani the best for kids fourth grade and
above, with the Cambridge Latin Series a close second, if not tied
actually. The idea was on fun and accomplishment and the stories in
these books are
cute and funny, though there are gross parts which appeal to the kids'
darker sides, too. Both contain plenty of exercises and grammar
explanations. I found Oxford also good, but it tended to move too
fast for the kids. Latin for Americans is a real winner, too, with
its emphasis on history, myths, etc. As others have told you and
given you links for, there are a host of other programs. But I've
always most enjoyed Ecce Romani, Cambridge, and Latin for Americans.
Kim
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42630 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Sodalitates
> Salue, M. Lucreti Agricola, et saluete, omnes!
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
> <fororom@...> wrote:
> ....
>
>
>>> > > ATS: No wonder...my browser will not scroll beyond where it
> says ÂŒpowered
>>> > > by mediawiki¹/about Nova Roma/etc. If this button is below that,
> I can¹t
>>> > > access it.
>>> > >
>
>
> You should be able to see it then. At the bottom of the edit window
> you should see sonething like this:
>
> ======================
>
> | *this is the edit window*
> |____________
>
> Summary: ___________________
> |_| This is a minor edit |_| Watch this page
>
> | SAVE PAGE | | SHOW PREVIEW | |SHOW CHANGES | Cancel | Editing help
> (opens in new window)
>
> Please note that all contributions to NovaRoma are considered to be
> released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.2 (see
> Project:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be
> edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here.
> You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it
> from a public domain or similar free resource. DO NOT SUBMIT
> COPYRIGHTED WORK WITHOUT PERMISSION!
>
>
> ==========================
>
> Those 3 buttons are not easy to spot: they are white and match the
> background. I have trouble spotting them myself.
>
> ATS: And it finally behaved! Correction accomplished! Bring on the
> Tabularium! (well, not yet...)
>
> Maybe Wiki should make things more obvious, yes? Some people are color
> blind? (not I...)
>
> Of course it is possible that for some reason your browser isn't
> putting the buttons on the page at all, but I think that unlikely.
>
> Optime vale
>
> Agricola
>
> Optime uale et ualete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42631 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: On Effeminate and Degenerate Romans (was: Ex Officio Tiberius
> Salue, Antoni, et saluete, omnes bonae uoluntatis!
>
> Salvete,
> I think what the Catholic Encyclopaedia is alluding to is the Christian
> (and pre-Christian Greco-Roman) view that those who live for the passions have
> become "effeminate" and not "manly" or virtuous. Years ago, a Latin professor
> told me that the word "virtue" comes from the Latin word "vir" which means
> "man".
>
> ATS: Indeed it does. It is derived from the Latin word uirtus. The
> ending ­tus is a common abstract-noun ending, which in this case is added to
> the word Œuir.¹ It thus means something like Œthe quality of being a man.¹
> This is not to be confused with, say, machismo or virility; there are
> different words for that even in Latin, which has a comparatively small
> vocabulary as languages go. Virtus means (the qualities typical of a true
> man, manly spirit, resolution, steadfastness; excellence of character or mind,
> worth, merit, ability; moral excellence, virtue, goodness;
> excellence)[definitions from the Oxford Latin Dictionary, the premier work in
> the field].
>
>
> Used here, it refers to one who is strong in self-control and living in accord
> with higher principles of living, such as those who live by Christian morality
> (which is a religious code) or the ethics of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle
> (which is natural law based). In the ancient Greco-Roman world and in the
> subsequent Christian period, the man who could live according to these higher
> principles was considered manly or virtuous. On the other hand, the man who
> could not live that way was considered effeminate and unable to control his
> passions.
> I hope this explanation helps somewhat. It is not my intention to offend
> anyone with this explanation but only to contribute what I've learned about
> the philosophy of the ancient world.
>
> ATS: Obviously, one could take offense at this, but as you note, this is
> an academic matter. Ancient attitudes toward women and toward those of
> alternative orientations were not necessarily terribly enlightened.
>
> A little technical hint: please snip irrelevant material, such as Yahoo
> ads, when replying to posts...
>
> Take care,
> Anthony
>
>
>
>
> Semiramis <semmie17@...> wrote:
> Salvete -
>
> The Catholic Encyclopedia has a very curious and problematic definition of the
> Romans in this paragraph below. Since when did the Roman spectators become an
> "effeminate and degenerate people"? Those two adjectives imply that the
> Romans, also by being "unchristian" in their naughty penchant for throwing
> Christians to lions, were both less than manly.... I know this is the
> Catholic Encyclopedia and thus understand the implied audience of its
> readership, but does anyone else find this adjectival combination irksome?
>
> If the Catholic Encyclopedia is correct, then, are football (British and
> American), soccer, and hockey fans "effeminate and degenerate" people because
> they enjoy "bloody spectacles"? I've always found these sports to be a
> natural continuum of gladiatorial games. How curious...
>
> Valete,
> Semmie Septemdecim
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Benjamin A. Okopnik noted:
>
> As far as I know, Romans didn't have duels [1]; that started later, at
> least the duel judicial. That's what I recall from my reading back when
> I was learning to fence, myself. The history of fencing is closely
> intertwined with dueling, and it can be gruesomely fascinating. Neither
> George Silver, whom I greatly admired at the time, nor Di Grassi [2]
> mention Romans except as proponents of both cut and thrust, and a quick
> Google search brings up the following:
>
> (From "The Catholic Encyclopedia",
> http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05184b.htm)
>
> Duelling was unknown to the civilized nations of antiquity. The contests
> of the Roman gladiators were not, like the duels of today, a means of
> self-defence, but bloody spectacles to satisfy the curiosity and cruelty
> of an effeminate and degenerate people. On the other hand the custom of
> duelling existed among the Gauls and Germans from the earliest era, as
> Diodorus Siculus (Biblioth. history Lib. V, ch. xxviii), Velleius
> Paterculus (Histor. rom., II, cxviii) and others relate.
>
> That was pretty much my own take, little as I know about it, so that
> concludes our program for the evening.
>
>
> [1] Heck, for all I know, they may have sued each other to death. Hey,
> maybe lawsuit-caused boredom was the reason that the Empire died out!
>
> [2] From his modestly named "Giacomo DiGrassi His True Art of Defense,
> plainly teaching by infallible Demonstrations, apt Figures and perfect
> Rules the manner and form how a man without other Teacher or Master may
> handle all sorts of Weapons aswell offensive as defensive: With a
> Treatise Of Deceit or Falsing: And with a way or Means by private
> Industry to obtain Strength, Judgement, and Activity (First written in
> Italian by the Foresaid Author, And Englished by I.G. gentleman.)"
>
>
> Caius Minucius Scaevola
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate.
> Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily.
> -- Principle known as Occam's Razor, "used for example in physics."

Vale, et ualete,

A. Tullia Scholastica



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42632 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Sodalitates
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
<fororom@...> wrote:
>
> > Salue, M. Lucreti Agricola, et saluete, omnes!
> >

>...

> >
> > Those 3 buttons are not easy to spot: they are white and match the
> > background. I have trouble spotting them myself.
> >
> > ATS: And it finally behaved! Correction accomplished! Bring on the
> > Tabularium! (well, not yet...)
> >
> > Maybe Wiki should make things more obvious, yes? Some people
are color
> > blind? (not I...)
> >


Wonderful!

And yes, I agree that if we can make those buttons more obvious we
should do it. Another item onthe collective plate of the wiki crew,
but a good one.

Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42633 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
On 3/11/06, dicconf <dicconf@...> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Annia Minucia Marcella wrote:
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "dicconf" <dicconf@...>
> >
> > "Tomasus Navis got
> >> Katie Domus pregnant out of wedlock and then abandoned her", for
> instance,
> >> is such a statement: any court would understand it as a gross insult
> >> without any need to prove that it was such.
> >
> > Salve,
> >
> > I agreed with you until here. How is it an insult, let alone a gross
> one?
>
> It asserts:
>
> 1) He impregnated a lady friend out of wedlock, a shameful action;
>
> 2) He then abandoned her, compounding the infamy.
>
> the insulting nature of the
> original statement is clear to any "person of normal understanding".
>
> -- Publius Livius Triarius


Sorry but I totally disagree with this. Personally I think that to say
impregnating a woman out of wedlock and then leaving her is shameful and
infamous is downright insulting to the whole of womankind. Had he raped her
yes that's shameful and illegal and should be punished. But come on, to
suggest we're all just passive vessals and all the responsibility is the
man's is a bigger insult than anything else I've heard. To compound it by
suggesting we then need the man to look after us - I'm actually speechless
(which doesn't often happen) but I've certainly never felt more insulted in
my life and quite honestly despairing when I think of how big a fight my
daughters generation still has to undergo before people seem to grasp the
meaning of the word 'equality' much less do anything to bring it about.

Flavia Lucilla Merula


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42634 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: The Forum ( subject changed by Praetor TGP)
In a message dated 3/10/2006 2:07:22 AM Pacific Standard Time,
tau.athanasios@... writes:
For that matter I wonder what they have to say about Nova Roma and our
efforts to rebuild the Religio Romana.


It depends on who you talk with. Some laugh at us, like what happened with
Antonio Gryllius when he announced Nova Roma's goals at a conference, others
find it an interesting experiment, with possible historical connotations, to
used as an educational tool, and still others like you and I find it redeeming
enough, to expend lots of time and effort to make sure it is a success.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42635 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
A. Apollonius Pompejae Minuciae omnibusque sal.

> I stand by for my mark in grammar and punctuation.

Twelve out of ten for quantity of punctuation. ;)



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42636 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
> He did? Right out of your mouth! No way!
> Pray tell Aventina, was this 'before' or 'after' you yanked your
> foot from it?

LOL! Ok, I have to admit that was a funny comeback!

The answer is: Both simultaneously. I call it 'multi-tasking'.

Vale,
Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42637 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: On Effeminate and Degenerate Romans (was: Ex Officio Tiberius
Salvete -

On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 04:34:27AM -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica wrote:
> > Salue, Antoni, et saluete, omnes bonae uoluntatis!
> >
> > Salvete,
> > I think what the Catholic Encyclopaedia is alluding to is the Christian
> > (and pre-Christian Greco-Roman) view that those who live for the passions have
> > become "effeminate" and not "manly" or virtuous. Years ago, a Latin professor
> > told me that the word "virtue" comes from the Latin word "vir" which means
> > "man".
> >
> > ATS: Indeed it does. It is derived from the Latin word uirtus. The
> > ending ­tus is a common abstract-noun ending, which in this case is added to
> > the word Œuir.¹ It thus means something like Œthe quality of being a man.¹
> > This is not to be confused with, say, machismo or virility; there are
> > different words for that even in Latin, which has a comparatively small
> > vocabulary as languages go. Virtus means (the qualities typical of a true
> > man, manly spirit, resolution, steadfastness; excellence of character or mind,
> > worth, merit, ability; moral excellence, virtue, goodness;
> > excellence)[definitions from the Oxford Latin Dictionary, the premier work in
> > the field].

Interestingly enough, 'vir' in Sanskrit means 'warrior'. Being that
Latin is part of that linguistic branch, I don't find it surprising at
all - but it was an interesting reminder of the connection while I was
going through Yoga teacher training (one of the classic postures is
/Virasana/, the Warrior posture (/asana/ = posture). There were
other parallels with Latin as well, which I don't recall at the moment.


Valete,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
...et praeterea censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
Furthermore, I believe Carthage should be destroyed.
(Cato Sr. After a journey to Carthage, the Roman senator concluded every speech
before the senate with this phrase, no matter the topic of discussion.)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42638 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salve,

I also had a child out of wedlock, and feel no shame about it whatsoever.
But I don't think feeling shame over what he did means anything. I think it
would be hard to find anyone guilty of insulting Tom Cruise because those
two things actually did happen. How is it libel or slander if it's true? I
don't get it.

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com


> It asserts:
>
> 1) He impregnated a lady friend out of wedlock, a shameful action;
>
> 2) He then abandoned her, compounding the infamy.
>
> A possible defense would be, that his culture does not regard illegitimate
> births as reflecting disgrace on the parents, and/or that Katie is
> independently wealthy and does not require child support. But such a
> defense would have to be proven, while the insulting nature of the
> original statement is clear to any "person of normal understanding".
>
> -- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42639 From: StarVVreck Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Word file
hello,
i send the file.
bye


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42640 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
A. Apollonius Anniae Minuciae P. Livio omnibus sal.

> ... How is it libel or
> slander if it's true? I
> don't get it.

I think it's important to say, just in case it's not
clear, that P. Livius is not describing the law of
Nova Roma on defamation - he's talking about other
systems of modern law. In Nova Roma, although
'calumnia' is strongly based on modern defamation, it
is not identical: there is no such thing as a
statement which is prima facie harmful to reputation,
for example: the burden is always on the accuser to
prove that his reputation has been harmed.

Also in 'calumnia' the statement cannot be criminal
unless it is false. Thus the burden is, again, on the
accuser to prove that the statement is false. In some
other modern systems this is reversed, and the burden
is on the defendant to prove that the statement is true.



___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Photos – NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 8p a photo http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42641 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: a.d. VI Id. Mar.
C. Equitius Cato P. Livio Triario sal.

Salve!


> Are hyou trying to cause a diplomatic incident with the Tunisians?
>
> -- Publius Livius Triarius
> ducking and running...


Don't you mean the Carthaginians? Oh, wait, we crushed them. Heh heh.

Vale bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42642 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: a.d. III Id. Mar.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem III Idus Martias; haec dies comitialis est.

In ancient Greece, today was celebrated in honor of Hercules.
Hercules (also known as Herakles) was the name in Roman mythology of
the hero Herakles from Greek mythology, the Roman name being a
metathesis of the Greek name. He is the son of Iuppiter, the Roman
counterpart to the Greek god Zeus and the mortal Alcmene. He was made
to perform twelve great tasks, called The Twelve Labours of Hercules
and became a god; the Romans adopted the Greek version of his life and
works essentially unchanged, but added anecdotal detail of their own,
some of it linking the hero with the geography of the Western
Mediterranean. Details of cult were adapted to Rome as well.

Hercules can be identified by his attributes, the lion skin and the
club. He is a paragon of masculinity, and thus embodies
characteristics such as great strength, great courage, and great
appetite, including great sexual appetite for women and boys. By
conquering negative forces he is said to have "made the world safe for
mankind." He is often compared to the biblical strong man Samson, who
also possessed vast superhuman strength and performed similar feats
such as wrestling a lion. The later Roman Emperors, in particular
Commodus and Maximinus, often identified or compared themselves with
Hercules.

The Great Altar of Hercules, housed within the Forum Boarium, has been
dated to the 6th or 5th century B.C. The cult of Hercules may have
been the first foreign one to be adopted in Rome; his most important
shrine, the Ara Maxima, was in the original Palatine settlement. He
became popular with merchants, who customarily paid him a tithe of
their profits.

Hercules is said to have founded an altar where the Forum Boarium, the
cattle market, was later held. One possible origin for the myth of the
Cattle of Geryon, one of The Twelve Labours of Herakles, has been
attributed to an older Milky Way myth which associates the Milky Way
constellation with a herd of dairy cattle, where each cow is
represented by a star.

Zeus, having made Alcmene pregnant with Herakles, proclaimed that the
next son born of the house of Perseus would become king. Hera, Zeus'
consort, hearing this, caused Eurystheus to be born two months early
as he was of the house of Perseus, while Herakles, also of the house,
was three months overdue. When he found out what had been done, Zeus
was furious; however, his rash proclamation still stood.

In a fit of madness, induced by Hera, Herakles slew his wife and
children; the fit then passed. Realising what he had done, he isolated
himself, going into the wilderness and living alone. He was found (by
his brother Iphicles) and convinced to visit the Oracle at Delphi. The
Oracle told him that as a penance he would have to perform a series of
ten tasks set by King Eurystheus, the man who had taken Herakles'
birthright and the man he hated the most.

In his labours, Herakles was often accompanied by his boyfriend (an
eromenos), according to some, Licymnius, or by others Iolaus, his
nephew. Although he was only supposed to perform ten labours, this
assistance led to him suffering two more, hence the dodekathlos, or
Twelve Labors. Eurystheus didn't count the Hydra, because Iolaus
helped him, or the Augean stables, as he received payment for his work
(in other versions it is because the rivers did the work).

The traditional order of the labours is:

1. Slay the Nemean Lion and bring back its skin.

"First he cleared the grove of Zeus of a lion, and put its skin upon
his back, hiding his yellow hair in its fearful tawny gaping jaws." -
Euripides, Hercules, 359

2. Slay the Lernaean Hydra.

"At the source of the Amymone grows a plane tree, beneath which, they
say, the hydra (water-snake) grew. I am ready to believe that this
beast was superior in size to other water-snakes, and that its poison
had something in it so deadly that Heracles treated the points of his
arrows with its gall. It had, however, in my opinion, one head, and
not several. It was Peisander of Camirus who, in order that the beast
might appear more frightful and his poetry might be more remarkable,
represented the hydra with its many heads" - Pausanias, Description of
Greece, 2.37.4

3. Capture the Ceryneian Hind.

"Now the hind was at Oenoe; it had golden horns and was sacred to
Artemis; so wishing neither to kill nor wound it, Hercules hunted it a
whole year. But when, weary with the chase, the beast took refuge on
the mountain called Artemisius, and thence passed to the river Ladon,
Hercules shot it just as it was about to cross the stream, and
catching it put it on his shoulders and hastened through Arcadia. But
Artemis with Apollo met him, and would have wrested the hind from him,
and rebuked him for attempting to kill her sacred animal. Howbeit, by
pleading necessity and laying the blame on Eurystheus, he appeased the
anger of the goddess and carried the beast alive to Mycenae." -
Apollodorus, Library and Epitome 2.5.3

4. Capture the Erymanthian Boar.

"But Pholus, drawing the arrow from a corpse, wondered that so little
a thing could kill such big fellows; howbeit, it slipped from his hand
and lighting on his foot killed him on the spot. So when Hercules
returned to Pholoe, he beheld Pholus dead; and he buried him and
proceeded to the boar hunt. And when he had chased the boar with
shouts from a certain thicket, he drove the exhausted animal into deep
snow, trapped it, and brought it to Mycenae." - Apollodorus, Library
and Epitome 2.5.4

5. Clean the Augean stables in one day.

"Hercules made a breach in the foundations of the cattle-yard, and
then, diverting the courses of the Alpheus and Peneus, [p. 197] which
flowed near each other, he turned them into the yard, having first
made an outlet for the water through another opening. When Augeas
learned that this had been accomplished at the command of Eurystheus,
he would not pay the reward; nay more, he denied that he had promised
to pay it, and on that point he professed himself ready to submit to
arbitration. The arbitrators having taken their seats, Phyleus was
called by Hercules and bore witness against his father, affirming that
he had agreed to give him a reward." - Apollodorus, 2.5.5.

6. Slay the Stymphalian Birds.

"These fly against those who come to hunt them, wounding and killing
them with their beaks. All armor of bronze or iron that men wear is
pierced by the birds; but if they weave a garment of thick cork, the
beaks of the Stymphalian birds are caught in the cork garment... These
birds are of the size of a crane, and are like the ibis, but their
beaks are more powerful, and not crooked like that of the ibis." -
Pausanias, Description of Greece, 8.22.5

7. Capture the Cretan Bull.

"...the Cretan bull. Acusilaus says that this was the bull that
ferried across Europa for Zeus; but some say it was the bull that
Poseidon sent up from the sea when Minos promised to sacrifice to
Poseidon what should appear out of the sea. And they say that when he
saw the beauty of the bull he sent it away to the herds and sacrificed
another to Poseidon; at which the god was angry and made the bull
savage. To attack this bull Hercules came to Crete, and when, in reply
to his request for aid, Minos told him to fight and catch the bull for
himself, he caught it and brought it to Eurystheus, and having shown
it to him he let it afterwards go free. But the bull roamed to Sparta
and all Arcadia, and traversing the Isthmus arrived at Marathon in
Attica and harried the inhabitants." - Apollodorus, 2.5.7

8. Steal the Mares of Diomedes.

"He mounted on a chariot and tamed with the bit the horses of
Diomedes, that greedily champed their bloody food at gory mangers with
unbridled jaws, devouring with hideous joy the flesh of men." -
Euripides, Hercules, 380

9. Obtain the Girdle of Hippolyte.

"The race of the Amazons is said to have been made up entirely of
women. These women possessed the highest knowledge of the warfare, and
they exhibited very great courage; for they dared to engage in
battle even with men. Hippolyte, the Queen of the Amazons, had a very
famous belt (war brest plate, girdle), which Mars had given to her.
Admeta, the daughter of Eursytheus, heard the story about this belt,
and really wanted to have it. Eurystheus, therefore, ordered Hercules
to collect an army and to make war on the Amazons. He sent out
messengers everywhere, and, after a great multitude came together, he
picked out those who had the greatest experience in warfare." -
Euripdes, Hercules 21

10. Obtain the Cows of Geryon.

"Now Erythia was an island near the ocean; it is now called Gadira.
This island was inhabited by Geryon, son of Chrysaor by Callirrhoe,
daughter of Ocean. He had the body of three men grown together and
joined in one at the waist, but parted in three from the flanks and
thighs. He owned red kine, of which Eurytion was the herdsman and
Orthus, the two-headed hound, begotten by Typhon on Echidna, was the
watchdog. So journeying through Europe to fetch the kine of Geryon he
destroyed many wild beasts and set foot in Libya, and proceeding to
Tartessus he erected as tokens of his journey two pillars over against
each other at the boundaries of Europe and Libya. But being heated by
the Sun on his journey, he bent his bow at the god, who in admiration
of his hardihood, gave him a golden goblet in which he crossed the
ocean. And having reached Erythia he lodged on Mount Abas. However
the dog, perceiving him, rushed at him; but he smote it with his club,
and when the herdsman Eurytion came to the help of the dog, Hercules
killed him also. But Menoetes, who was there pasturing the kine of
Hades, reported to Geryon what had occurred, and he, coming up with
Hercules beside the river Anthemus, as he was driving away the kine,
joined battle with him and was shot dead. And Hercules, embarking the
kine in the goblet and sailing across to Tartessus, gave back the
goblet to the Sun." - Apollodorus, Library and Epitome 2.5.10


11. Steal the Apples of the Hesperides.

"Now Prometheus had told Hercules not to go himself after the apples
but to send Atlas, first relieving him of the burden of the sphere; so
when he was come to Atlas in the land of the Hyperboreans, he took the
advice and relieved Atlas. But when Atlas had received three apples
from the Hesperides, he came to Hercules, and not wishing to support
the sphere< he said that he would himself carry the apples to
Eurystheus, and bade Hercules hold up the sky in his stead. Hercules
promised to do so, but succeeded by craft in putting it on Atlas
instead. For at the advice of Prometheus he begged Atlas to hold up
the sky till he should put a pad on his head. When Atlas heard that,
he laid the apples down on the ground and took the sphere from
Hercules. And so Hercules picked up the apples and departed. But some
say that he did not get them from Atlas, but that he plucked the
apples himself after killing the guardian snake. And having brought
the apples he gave them to Eurystheus. But he, on receiving them,
bestowed them on Hercules, from whom Athena got them and conveyed them
back again; for it was not lawful that they should be laid down
anywhere." - Apollodorus, Library and Epitome 2.5.11

12. Capture Cerberus.

"...A monster not to be overcome and that may not be described,
Cerberus who eats raw flesh, the brazen-voiced hound of Hades,
fifty-headed, relentless and strong." - Hesiod, Theogony 310

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Pausanius, Euripdes, Apollodorus, Hesiod, The Twelve Labors
(http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/Herakles/index.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42643 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Annia Minucia Marcella wrote:

> Salve,
>
> I also had a child out of wedlock, and feel no shame about it whatsoever.
> But I don't think feeling shame over what he did means anything. I think it
> would be hard to find anyone guilty of insulting Tom Cruise because those
> two things actually did happen. How is it libel or slander if it's true? I
> don't get it.

It would be a slander or libel (depending on whether it was spoken or
written down) if the statement were untrue. Truth is a defense in an
action for libel. However, in this case proving it was true would lay him
open to suit for child support, at the least. (Yes, a millionairess can
sue for child support. It recognizes the man's responsibility, not her
dependency.) So he's let himself in for trouble either way, and I think
that's just peachy.

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42644 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Kirsteen Wright wrote:

> On 3/11/06, dicconf <dicconf@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Annia Minucia Marcella wrote:
>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "dicconf" <dicconf@...>
>>>
>>> "Tomasus Navis got
>>>> Katie Domus pregnant out of wedlock and then abandoned her", for
>> instance,
>>>> is such a statement: any court would understand it as a gross insult
>>>> without any need to prove that it was such.
>>>
>>> Salve,
>>>
>>> I agreed with you until here. How is it an insult, let alone a gross
>> one?
>>
>> It asserts:
>>
>> 1) He impregnated a lady friend out of wedlock, a shameful action;
>>
>> 2) He then abandoned her, compounding the infamy.
>>
>> the insulting nature of the
>> original statement is clear to any "person of normal understanding".
>>
> Sorry but I totally disagree with this. Personally I think that to say
> impregnating a woman out of wedlock and then leaving her is shameful and
> infamous is downright insulting to the whole of womankind. Had he raped her
> yes that's shameful and illegal and should be punished. But come on, to
> suggest we're all just passive vessals and all the responsibility is the
> man's is a bigger insult than anything else I've heard. To compound it by
> suggesting we then need the man to look after us - I'm actually speechless
> (which doesn't often happen) but I've certainly never felt more insulted in
> my life and quite honestly despairing when I think of how big a fight my
> daughters generation still has to undergo before people seem to grasp the
> meaning of the word 'equality' much less do anything to bring it about.

This is a modern and an exaggerated attitude. To deceive the lady in the
case with a promise of marriage which he then broke is as shameful an act
as subduing her by force, even though "breach of promise" is no longer
recognized as a tort in law. To leave her with the task of raising a
child as a single parent is an abdication of his share of the
responsibility -- put simply, they both engendered the child, and both of
them should be responsible for its upbringing. The idea that men are free
to slough off their parenting responsibilities is one that should have
died back about, oh, 1830, at least. Even if they haven't any parenting
skills there are plenty of other jobs required in a household that he has
no right to expect his lady friend to do while she's busy raising their
child. This isn't "looking after" her; it's sharing the tasks on an equal
basis. I don't think it's quite insulting, but it is thoughtless, to say
that the man is treating the woman as a "passive vessel" who would be
helpless without him. And it certainly would be regarded as an actionable
insult by any court outside the most backward Muslim lands to say that he
had seduced, impregnated, and abandoned her.

_In_ the most backward Muslim lands, of course, it would be regarded as
grounds for a revenge killing, but that's beside the point.

And if it were not merely said but proven to be the case in our lands, it
would be the occasion for some pretty severe sentences for child support.

Such, cives, are my opinions, and it is my further opinion that he who
does not love and honor women was probably suckled by a sow.

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42645 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: a.d. VI Id. Mar.
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, gaiusequitiuscato wrote:

> C. Equitius Cato P. Livio Triario sal.
>
> Salve!
>
>> Are hyou trying to cause a diplomatic incident with the Tunisians?
>>
>> -- Publius Livius Triarius
>> ducking and running...
>
> Don't you mean the Carthaginians? Oh, wait, we crushed them. Heh heh.

That's a salty comment indeed.

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42646 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
On 3/11/06, dicconf <dicconf@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> This is a modern and an exaggerated attitude.


Amazing how in this day and age men still react to the idea that they might
not be needed as 'an exaggerated attitude'. Sadly I rest my case.

Flavia Lucilla Merula

--
> Chaos, confusion, disorder - my work here is done


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42647 From: Maior Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
M. Hortensia Anniae Minuciae Marcellae spd;
Triarius is confusing laws and society. Today, having a child is
just that; the happy event of having a child. A better example for
libel or defamation would be:
Ms. Caesar says or writes " Dr. Bruta is an alcoholic..."
leading Dr. Bruta's patients to flee as no one wants a doctor to
treat them if she is under the influence. If Dr. Bruta is not an
alcoholic, than she sue Ms. Caesar for the $ harm.
It used to be that calling or writing that someone is 'gay' or
saying the person has Venerial Disease was libel/defamatory, but of
course society changes and these are regarded as strictly states and
not insulting terms that will affect your career. Unless you are a
monk, nun or Vestal Virgin.
bene vale
Marca Hortensia Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42648 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Scaevola Cordus sal.

On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 07:21:38PM +0000, A. Apollonius Cordus wrote:
> A. Apollonius C. Minucio omnibusque sal.
>
> > The example illustrates one single case of incongruence; nowhere
> > does it claim to cover _all_ possible cases of incongruence. If it
> > did, then the only cases which could be seen as incongruent were
> > those that used the exact formula in the example, and there's nobody
> > named 'Ticius' here.
>
> Indeed: the example doesn't illustrate every possible
> example, but it gives a clear indication of what sort
> of situation the provision is meant to cover. Let me
> quote it again:
>
> '"Ticius must be expelled from Nova Roma because he is
> bearded" is an incongruent claim, for it is not
> supported by law, precedent or common sense.'

And this is what I'm saying: that the claim is not supported by law
(except in the most ridiculous interpretation), precedent, or common
sense.

> The part about beards is not the most important part:
> the most important part is the part which says that
> the claim is incongruent because "it is not supported
> by law, precedent, or common sense". So clearly a
> claim which is supported by none of those three things
> will be incongruent. It is not altogether clear
> whether all three of those things have to be present
> in order for a claim to be congruent. I would say not:
> the first claim under any given lex will always be
> unsupported by precedent, so if precedent were always
> required then all petitiones would be incongruent. I
> think the most natural interpretation is this: if a
> claim is supported by law, or by precedent, or by
> common sense, then it is congruent.

If we're going to focus on the letter of the law to the exclusion of
everything else (including common sense), then please note the "or" in
the above formula. You're welcome to interpret it as "[not supported by]
law AND precedent OR common sense", or perhaps "[not supported by]
EITHER law OR precedent OR common sense" - which is the way I see it,
since the absence of common sense alone would make the prosecution of
the case a laughing stock. What you _cannot_ do, without distorting the
rules of the English language past any recognition, is ignore that "or"
and make all the conjunctions into ANDs - which is what your statement,
above, does. "Not supported by law, precedent or common sense" is in no
way equivalent to "is supported by either law, or precedent or common
sense"; if anything, the two are very close to being opposites.

> The point of the example is surely this: the reason
> the claim against Ticius is incongruent is because
> even if the allegation (that Ticius is bearded) were
> true, it would not be illegal and there would be no
> grounds for expelling the bearded Ticius from Nova
> Roma. That's what it means when it says that the claim
> is not supported by law, precedent, or common sense:
> the claim against Ticius should be dismissed because
> law, precedent, and common sense all say that what
> Ticius is being accused of is not a crime.

I disagree. In the broad interpretation of "precedent" that you seem to
be applying, it does indeed exist - at least as long as anyone here was
sued for any reason. As to law, as long as a law exists that permits
citizens to sue one another, that condition is fulfilled. HOWEVER,
regardless of the truth or falsity of either of the above, there is one
condition here that fails, and brings the entire structure down with it:
the claim makes no sense - since being bearded is not a crime in Nova
Roma. *Based on that one item alone*, the claim fails.

> > This case is incongruent because my statements were
> > a) neither false nor
> > defamatory, and b) cannot be proven to have damaged
> > the plaintiff's
> > dignity - even if he is assumed to possess any.
>
> This is a totally impossible reading of the law.
> You're saying that the petitio should be dismissed
> because it has not been proven that your statements
> were false or defamatory or that they harmed Domitius
> Constantinus' reputation.

No, that's not what I'm saying. My fault for not making it clearer,
obviously, so I'll try again: the claim is *patently* false, since the
plaintiff's actions which I denoted in my post have been observed - and
noted - by a number of others here. My statement was an observation of a
_fact,_ not some invented flight of fancy; if I had said "Fuscus engages
in intimate relationships with sheep!", I would agree that his
subsequent claim of calumnia would at least have some possible merit -
even if it _was_ true, I'd still have to produce photographs,
recordings, love letters, signed statements from the witnesses, etc. to
prove my case, since the facts of my statement would not have been
*evident*.

Demanding that I involve myself in some sort of a proceeding because I
had commented on an observed fact is ridiculous - and violates the
"common sense" requirement.

> > Errr, no. What I said was that the Praetor who was
> > responsible for
> > prosecuting the case ran out, and the Nova Roma
> > justice system failed,
> > egregiously, to correct for that problem. I also
> > said that that Praetor
> > had previously been suborned by political
> > considerations to argue that I
> > had to prove damage in a case involving a death
> > threat.
>
> It's the second point I'm referring to. The praetor in
> that case was persuaded that before your petitio could
> be accepted you had to produce proof.

Yes, proof of _actual damage_ in the case of a death threat. I presume
that presenting my own dead body riddled with shrapnel would have
satisfied him, but I'm not certain; I suspect that he would have
demanded the signature of the accused on every fragment...


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate.
Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily.
-- Principle known as Occam's Razor, "used for example in physics."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42649 From: daylily218 Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Minimus Vivat!!
Yes, Minimus is super. Cute drawings and funny little
stories and simple grammar that comes naturally and is
explained simply. Kim
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42650 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Maior wrote:

> M. Hortensia Anniae Minuciae Marcellae spd;
> Triarius is confusing laws and society. Today, having a child is
> just that; the happy event of having a child.

Yes. It's the next eighteen years that are a parenting problem.

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42651 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Salvete Scaevola et omnes

Just my opinions, for whatever they are worth.

1. The burden of proof is on Fuscus to show that Scaevola's
statements were indeed "false AND defamatory" under Section XIV on
Calumnia of the Lex Salicia Poenalis, and, further, in order to be
considered defamatory Fuscus will also have to show that the
statements have indeed "damaged the dignity or reputation" of
himself. The only thing that a Praetor has to consider in the
initial investigation for this action is whether or not the Actor
has presented sufficient evidence to make a case, not whether he can
prove his case. A Praetor may use his or her discretion to determine
whether an accusation may be frivolous, but the duty of a Praetor in
protecting the rights of citizens is, in general, to allow an action
where there is some evidence to support the claim. A Praetor should
dismiss the claim of the suit if, upon investigation, the claim is
shown to be unsubstantiated. Supplying statements made in a public
forum is enough evidence to present a claim.

2. The defense of the Reus in a suit of calumnia can be, as Triarius
pointed out, that the statements which alledgedly caused the
defaming of a person's reputation were indeed true. It would depend
on the nature of the statements, I think, but a Praetor could in
some circumstances dismiss an action if during the investigation he
or she would discover an alledged defamatory statement was in fact
true. For example, if the Actor claimed that he was defamed by a
Reus who had stated that the Actor had stolen money and the Praetor
then learned in his investigation that the statement was true, then
the statement could not be taken as calumnia and the Praetor would
have to dismiss the suit. In most cases, though, the dispute
between an Actor and Reus will come down to a difference of opinion
on the validity of a statement. It is really the role of the
iudices and not that of the Praetor to determine. Even if the
Praetor were to have his own doubts on the claim, he should not
dismiss the suit out of hand because that would usually entail
depriving a civis of his or her constitutional rights for redress of
wrongs.

3. Nova Roma currently does not, but Roma antiqua certainly did have
laws against bringing forth frivolous suits. Nonetheless, filing a
suit and failing to substantiate the claim could be grounds for a
counter action. Making a case that one was defamed, that his or her
reputation or dignity was somehow damaged, is not an easy claim to
prove. But the burden of proof is on the Actor, VI.C. And this
must be proven without any reasonable doubt, otherwise "the iudices
must acquit the reus," VI.B. This would also of course apply in any
counter suit.

4. In the other case that Scaevola mentions, the only "proof" that
was needed was to produce a threatening email. Sending threatening
emails violates macronational laws, and under the Lex Salicia
Poenalis "The praetores shall be held responsible for denouncing
those crimes to the appropriate macronational authorities, and all
the magistratus of Nova Roma shall give their assistance in the
performance of that duty." If the Praetor did not take appropriate
action, or if anyone impeded magistrates from reporting a crime to
proper authorities, then Scaevola could file suit on that basis
against the Praetor or others. He can also resubmit his claim, since
the exclusionary rule under VI.D would only apply if the suit had
gone before a tribunal and the Reus was acquitted. The only other
grounds to dismiss the suit now would be if five years had passed
from the "discovery." In a case such as Cato tried to bring earlier
against a seated magistrate, the "discovery" would be in suspension
until the magistrate left office.


Inspite of whatever opinion may be held by the Praetor, myself as a
Tribunus Plebis, or by anyone else, as to the merit of a claim, the
judicial system was set up to deal with such disputes between
individual cives. Bottom line is that a civis has a right to pursue
claims against other cives if he or she so wishes. It is not a
right to be used frivolously, nor is it a right that should be
summarily dismissed.

Valete optime et bonam habete fortunam
M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
Tribunus Plebis


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Benjamin A. Okopnik" <ben@...>
wrote:
<snipped>
> > > This case is incongruent because my statements were
> > > a) neither false nor
> > > defamatory, and b) cannot be proven to have damaged
> > > the plaintiff's
> > > dignity - even if he is assumed to possess any.
> >
> > This is a totally impossible reading of the law.
> > You're saying that the petitio should be dismissed
> > because it has not been proven that your statements
> > were false or defamatory or that they harmed Domitius
> > Constantinus' reputation.
>
> No, that's not what I'm saying. My fault for not making it clearer,
> obviously, so I'll try again: the claim is *patently* false, since
the
> plaintiff's actions which I denoted in my post have been observed -
and
> noted - by a number of others here. My statement was an
observation of a
> _fact,_ not some invented flight of fancy; if I had said "Fuscus
engages
> in intimate relationships with sheep!", I would agree that his
> subsequent claim of calumnia would at least have some possible
merit -
> even if it _was_ true, I'd still have to produce photographs,
> recordings, love letters, signed statements from the witnesses,
etc. to
> prove my case, since the facts of my statement would not have been
> *evident*.
>
> Demanding that I involve myself in some sort of a proceeding
because I
> had commented on an observed fact is ridiculous - and violates the
> "common sense" requirement.
>
> > > Errr, no. What I said was that the Praetor who was
> > > responsible for
> > > prosecuting the case ran out, and the Nova Roma
> > > justice system failed,
> > > egregiously, to correct for that problem. I also
> > > said that that Praetor
> > > had previously been suborned by political
> > > considerations to argue that I
> > > had to prove damage in a case involving a death
> > > threat.
> >
> > It's the second point I'm referring to. The praetor in
> > that case was persuaded that before your petitio could
> > be accepted you had to produce proof.
>
> Yes, proof of _actual damage_ in the case of a death threat. I
presume
> that presenting my own dead body riddled with shrapnel would have
> satisfied him, but I'm not certain; I suspect that he would have
> demanded the signature of the accused on every fragment...
>
>
> Vale,
> Caius Minucius Scaevola
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-
> Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate.
> Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily.
> -- Principle known as Occam's Razor, "used for example in
physics."
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42652 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-11
Subject: Off Topic News For Our British Citizens
Salvete omnes,

I caught the news late last night that John Purfumo passed away at 91.
He was a conservative British MP that got set up and involved with a
call girl in 1963. The only problem was that she was also involved
with a Russian military diplomat at the same time. Ultimately this
scandal brought down the McMillan government. Purfomo though took it
like a good Roman, resigned then worked hard to help the needy and
less fortunate for the rest of his life and that says a lot for him.

There is a good movie from 1989 based on this called " Scandal " with
John Hurt and Val Kilmer's wife. Well worth seeing in my opinion!


Regards,

QSP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42653 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-03-12
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
Salve Publi Triari

Em, try thirty, or even the next fifty years with some offspring, as
to how long the problems of parenting can last. Just an observation,
as a parent.

Vale
M Moravius Piscinus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, dicconf <dicconf@...> wrote:
> Yes. It's the next eighteen years that are a parenting problem.
>
> -- Publius Livius Triarius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42654 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-12
Subject: a.d IV Id. Mar.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem IV Idus Martias; haec dies comitialis est.

(By the way, I mixed up the dating; as you may have noticed, I called
yesterday "a.d. III Idus Martias", which it was not. I just skipped
from "a.d. VI Id. Mar." to "a.d. III Id. Mar." We're not moving
backwards in time, no matter how reactionary we might be.)

"Silvia, the Vestal, (why not begin with her?)
Sought water at dawn to wash sacred things.
When she came to where the path ran gently down
The sloping bank, she set down the earthenware jar
From her head. Weary, she sat on the ground and opened
Her dress to the breeze, and composed her ruffled hair.
While she sat there, the shadowy willows, melodious birds,
And the soft murmur of the water made her sleepy.
Sweet slumber slyly stole across her conquered eyes,
And her languid hand fell, from supporting her chin.
Mars saw her, seeing her desired her, desiring her
Possessed her, by divine power hiding his theft.
She lost sleep, lay there heavily: and already,
Rome's founder had his being in her womb." - Ovid, Fasti III

"Ascanius was succeeded by his son Silvius, who by some chance had
been born in the forest. He became the father of Aeneas Silvius, who
in his turn had a son, Latinus Silvius. He planted a number of
colonies: the colonists were called Prisci Latini. The cognomen of
Silvius was common to all the remaining kings of Alba, each of whom
succeeded his father. Their names are Alba, Atys, Capys, Capetus,
Tiberinus, who was drowned in crossing the Albula, and his name
transferred to the river, which became henceforth the famous Tiber.
Then came his son Agrippa, after him his son Romulus Silvius. He was
struck by lightning and left the crown to his son Aventinus, whose
shrine was on the hill which bears his name and is now a part of the
city of Rome. He was succeeded by Proca, who had two sons, Numitor and
Amulius. To Numitor, the elder, he bequeathed the ancient throne of
the Silvian house. Violence, however, proved stronger than either the
father's will or the respect due to the brother's seniority; for
Amulius expelled his brother and seized the crown. Adding crime to
crime, he murdered his brother's sons and made the daughter, Rea
Silvia, a Vestal virgin; thus, under the presence of honouring her,
depriving her of all hopes of issue.

But the Fates had, I believe, already decreed the origin of this great
city and the foundation of the mightiest empire under heaven. The
Vestal was forcibly violated and gave birth to twins. She named Mars
as their father, either because she really believed it, or because the
fault might appear less heinous if a deity were the cause of it. But
neither gods nor men sheltered her or her babes from the king's
cruelty; the priestess was thrown into prison, the boys were ordered
to be thrown into the river. By a heaven-sent chance it happened that
the Tiber was then overflowing its banks, and stretches of standing
water prevented any approach to the main channel. Those who were
carrying the children expected that this stagnant water would be
sufficient to drown them, so under the impression that they were
carrying out the king's orders they exposed the boys at the nearest
point of the overflow, where the Ficus Ruminalis (said to have been
formerly called Romularis) now stands. The locality was then a wild
solitude. The tradition goes on to say that after the floating cradle
in which the boys had been exposed had been left by the retreating
water on dry land, a thirsty she-wolf from the surrounding hills,
attracted by the crying of the children, came to them, gave them her
teats to suck and was so gentle towards them that the king's
flock-master found her licking the boys with her tongue." - Livy,
History of Rome 1.3-4

According to legend, Rhea Sylvia (or Rea Silvia) was the daughter of
Numitor, king of Albalonga and descendant of Aeneas. Numitor's brother
Amulius seized the throne and killed Numitor's son. Amulius forced
Rhea Sylvia to become a Vestal Virgin, a priestess to the goddess
Vesta. Vestal Virgins where sworn to celibacy for a period of thirty
years. Amulius forced her to become a Vestal Virgin so that she (and
through her, Numitor) would have no heirs.

The god Mars, however, took a fancy to Rhea Sylvia and raped her,
conceiving the twins. When he learned of this, Amulius ordered Rhea
Sylvia buried alive (the standard punishment for Vestal Virgins who
did not remain celibate) and ordered a servant to kill the twins, but
the merciful servant set them adrift in the river Tiber. The
river-god, Tiberinus found the twins and gave them to a she-wolf,
Lupa, to suckle, and then he rescued and married Rhea Silvia. Romulus
and Remus went on to found Rome and overthrow Amulius, reinstating
Numitor as King of Alba Longa.

The name Rea Silvia suggests a minor deity, a demi-goddess of forests.
Silva means woods or forest, and Rea may be related to res and regnum;
Rea may also be related to Greek rheo, "flow," and thus relate to her
association with the spirit of the river Tiber.



"In the year of our Lord 605, having ruled the apostolic Roman Church
most illustriously for thirteen years, six months, and ten days, the
blessed Pope Gregory died and was taken up to his eternal home in
heaven. And it is fitting that he should receive special mention in
this history, since it was through his zeal that our English nation
was brought from the bondage of Satan to the Faith of Christ, and we
may rightly term him our own apostle. For during his pontificate,
while he exercised supreme authority over all the churches of
Christendom that had already long since been converted, he transformed
our still idolatrous nation into a church of Christ. So we may rightly
describe him as our own apostle, for while others may not regard him
in this light, he was certainly an apostle to our own nation, and we
are the seal of his apostleship in the Lord." - The Venerable Bede,
"Ecclesiastical History of The English People"


On this day pope St. Gregory "the Great" (or "Dialogos" in the Eastern
Orthodox Church) went the way of all flesh. Gregory was born to a
patrician Christian Roman family (father, Gordianus, and mother,
Silvia) that owned latifundia in the south and a domus on the Caelian
Hill, the foundations of which support the Church of St. Andrew and
St. Gregory. He pursued a secular political career, which probably
climaxed in the position of Prefect of Rome, the highest civil honor,
before he entered a Benedictine monastery that he had founded. In the
Eastern Orthodox Church, Gregory is credited with devising the Liturgy
of the Presanctified Gifts. It is celebrated on certain nights during
Great Lent in the Eastern Orthodox Church.


"Non Angli, sed Angeli." - Pope Gregory I, upon seeing prisoners from
Britannia, inspiring him to send St. Augustine (not the bishop of
Hippo) on missionary work to England.

When he became pope in 590, among his first acts were writing a series
of letters disavowing any ambition to the throne of Peter and praising
the contemplative life of the Black monks. At that time the See had
not exerted effective leadership in the West since the pontificate of
Gelasius. The episcopacy in Gaul was drawn from the families of the
great territorial families, and identified with them: the parochial
horizon of Gregory's contemporary Gregory of Tours may be considered
typical; in Visigothic Spain the bishops had control of the monarchs,
with little contact with Rome; in Italy the papacy was beset by the
violent Lombard dukes and the rivalry of the Byzantines in the
Exarchate of Ravenna and in the south. The scholarship and culture of
Celtic Christianity had developed utterly unconnected with Rome, and
it was from Ireland that Britain and Germany were likely to become
Christianized, or so it seemed. Gregory took in hand the conversion
of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, where inaction might have encouraged the
Celtic missionaries already active in the north of Britain. Sending
Augustine of Canterbury to convert the Kingdom of Kent was prepared by
the marriage of the king to a Merovingian princess who had brought her
chaplains with her. By the time of Gregory's death, the conversion of
the king and the Kentish nobles and the establishment of a Christian
toehold at Canterbury were established.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy, Ovid, Gregfory I "the Great", Rhea Silvia
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhea_Silvia)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42655 From: dicconf Date: 2006-03-12
Subject: Re: Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, marcushoratius wrote:

> Salve Publi Triari
>
> Em, try thirty, or even the next fifty years with some offspring, as
> to how long the problems of parenting can last. Just an observation,
> as a parent.

I think I could put up even with that if I had children of my own.

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42656 From: Benjamin A. Okopnik Date: 2006-03-12
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Salve, M. Moravius Piscinus Horatius.

On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 03:59:38AM -0000, marcushoratius wrote:
> Salvete Scaevola et omnes
>
> Just my opinions, for whatever they are worth.

I've always found them worthwhile; thanks for taking the time to express
them.

> 1. The burden of proof is on Fuscus to show that Scaevola's
> statements were indeed "false AND defamatory" under Section XIV on
> Calumnia of the Lex Salicia Poenalis, and, further, in order to be
> considered defamatory Fuscus will also have to show that the
> statements have indeed "damaged the dignity or reputation" of
> himself.

[nod] That's the way I saw it as well, which seemed to me to run counter
to this entire proceeding. There was never a reasonable cause upon which
to convene a trial; the only reason for it that I can see is the
desperation on the part of a magistrate who wants to "make his mark".

I may well be wrong in assuming that the quality of the court
proceedings will reflect the same standard as the quality of the initial
evidentiary determination (which was, in my opinion, a demonstration of
nothing more than flagrant self-service by the praetor.) However, I see
nothing indicating that it would be otherwise - which would add even
more to this senseless waste of time.

Oh, by the way: I'm willing to discuss the failures of the NR justice
system - some of which are conveniently demonstrated by this case - all
day long, at least while I have the time for it. Spending time on the
case itself is something I find doesn't interest me in the least.

> A Praetor may use his or her discretion to determine
> whether an accusation may be frivolous, but the duty of a Praetor in
> protecting the rights of citizens is, in general, to allow an action
> where there is some evidence to support the claim.

Hm. Well, I suppose that this is a reasonable standard when seen from
that perspective. However, there's no protection when seen from another
direction: imagine a political faction - we'll pick a random name, say
"the Boni" - who decide to harass someone here they don't like (we'll
call this person 'X'.) The only thing they have to do, given the above
standard, is say "in post #231434, this person said <some random thing
that could be construed as being other than pro-Boni>. I'm filing a
complaint!" After a while, X has 25 or 30 suits against him which he is,
by NR law, required to answer. Call it, what, four hours per case? Ten?
Perhaps as many as twenty? Which of us here has that much time to commit
to doing something that can bring NO POSITIVE RESULT? After all, the
best that X can hope for is that all the iudices will act fairly (i.e.,
that there's not a subgroup of Boni within any of the sets), and that
none of the accusations stick. What protection does X have against this
sort of harassment?

The answer, currently, is "none - except, possibly, the common sense of
the Praetor." *THIS* is what is missing here. This is the protection I
do not have; this is the injustice, in this specific case, that is being
perpetrated.

In the world outside NR, there are moderately large costs associated
with starting a lawsuit against someone. In NR, all you have to do to
waste hours and hours of a person's productive time is invest 30 seconds
of your own in composing a message to a Praetor. In the world of
computer security, that kind of imbalance is called a "vulnerability":
i.e., an entry point that can be exploited by a virus or a network
attack in order to damage the host system. As it stands, NR's justice
system is vulnerable to this kind of viruses - and that vulnerability
is, indeed, under attack.

> 3. Nova Roma currently does not, but Roma antiqua certainly did have
> laws against bringing forth frivolous suits. Nonetheless, filing a
> suit and failing to substantiate the claim could be grounds for a
> counter action.

What sort of a counter action? If there was such a thing, I would see
that as _some_ protection for the accused. Failing that - and I'm aware
of no such thing in NR law - I only see participation in this case as
_validating_ unjust practice.

> 4. In the other case that Scaevola mentions, the only "proof" that
> was needed was to produce a threatening email.

I did so - repeatedly, upon request. More than that, it was an email
that was sent to an NR magistrate (/mirabile dictu/!), so I was not the
only, or even the first, witness to it.

> Sending threatening
> emails violates macronational laws, and under the Lex Salicia
> Poenalis "The praetores shall be held responsible for denouncing
> those crimes to the appropriate macronational authorities, and all
> the magistratus of Nova Roma shall give their assistance in the
> performance of that duty." If the Praetor did not take appropriate
> action, or if anyone impeded magistrates from reporting a crime to
> proper authorities, then Scaevola could file suit on that basis
> against the Praetor or others.

That Praetor is gone, and in my estimation, the illegal actions that he
took were solely his - regardless of the people whom he quoted as
bringing up the specious arguments (they were, after all, only trying
to protect their political friends.)

> He can also resubmit his claim, since
> the exclusionary rule under VI.D would only apply if the suit had
> gone before a tribunal and the Reus was acquitted. The only other
> grounds to dismiss the suit now would be if five years had passed
> from the "discovery." In a case such as Cato tried to bring earlier
> against a seated magistrate, the "discovery" would be in suspension
> until the magistrate left office.
>
>
> Inspite of whatever opinion may be held by the Praetor, myself as a
> Tribunus Plebis, or by anyone else, as to the merit of a claim, the
> judicial system was set up to deal with such disputes between
> individual cives. Bottom line is that a civis has a right to pursue
> claims against other cives if he or she so wishes. It is not a
> right to be used frivolously, nor is it a right that should be
> summarily dismissed.

My problem with the process as it stands is that there's protection
against the latter - but none against the former.


Vale,
Caius Minucius Scaevola
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Primum est non nocere.
First of all, do no harm.
-- Hippocrates; The maxim has become an ethical guiding principle in medicine.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42657 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-03-12
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Salvete omnes!

I'd much rather see time better spent in NR arguing or fighting about
how to raise more funds, build temples, have public festivals etc
rather than this. It is indeed fortunate that recruiting plans like "
Go Roman " are not quite in gear yet since some prospective citizens
would hardly be impressed with the proceedings; many here understand
but do not forget that you never have a second chance to make a first
impression.

Be that as it may, this show will go on and once promised, it is
probably not a good idea to cancel it just as a cancellation of a
promised circus could be quite disappointing and catastrophic in
ancient times ultimately rousing the wrath of the rabble. Now in his
tone, as I mentioned in the BA, Scaevola says, "if I am still here..."
For those waiting on the entertainment with anticipation, pray
Scaevola will not cheat the citizens out of this spectical by pulling
the plug and leaving...-:)


Regards,

QSP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42658 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-03-12
Subject: Asking about the roman legions in Lusitania
SALVETE OMNES!

I'm a provisional citizen of Nova Roma, very interessed in historical recreation of roman legions. ( in fact I have a military training ).
I would like to ask to everyone who may have a knowlegde about the legionaries (legions) placed in Lusitania, about the historcal facts of roman military activities in the province of Lusitania in order to create a group of historical recriation (legion) in this province.
I already noticed that there is a very small contribution of new-roman members
in Lusitania. ( Maybe a Senador Lusitano could answer to my question: Why there ain't any promotion to create any larger interset among portugues people? The Brazilians are organized, and the spanish people too....).
I would like to ask a guidance of those who already were able to create such an activivity in their homelands: How to create a legion? How to create an interest of someone to join in legion? Which a first pass?
Any idea or historical fact I will be gratefull to recieve!

Gaius Cassius Piso


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis
Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42659 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-03-12
Subject: Re: Asking about the roman legions in Lusitania
Salve Gai Cassi,

Have you joined the Sodalitas Militarium? There might be someone over
there who could help you.

Vale,

-- Marinus

kari piessa wrote:

> SALVETE OMNES!
>
> I'm a provisional citizen of Nova Roma, very interessed in historical recreation of roman legions. ( in fact I have a military training ).
> I would like to ask to everyone who may have a knowlegde about the legionaries (legions) placed in Lusitania, about the historcal facts of roman military activities in the province of Lusitania in order to create a group of historical recriation (legion) in this province.
> I already noticed that there is a very small contribution of new-roman members
> in Lusitania. ( Maybe a Senador Lusitano could answer to my question: Why there ain't any promotion to create any larger interset among portugues people? The Brazilians are organized, and the spanish people too....).
> I would like to ask a guidance of those who already were able to create such an activivity in their homelands: How to create a legion? How to create an interest of someone to join in legion? Which a first pass?
> Any idea or historical fact I will be gratefull to recieve!
>
> Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42660 From: Marcus Horatius Date: 2006-03-12
Subject: Results of Senate Votes
Tribunus Plebis Marcus Moravius Piscinus Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit:
Iubeo bono animo esse

Senate Voting Results, die tertio ante Idus Martiae MMDCCLIX (13 March 2006 CE 04.23 CET)

The Senate was called to order on Friday March 3, 2006 (2759) by Consul Pompeia Minucia Strabo. The Contio was held on agenda items from Sautrday 4 March 2006 through Wednesday 8 March 2006. Voting on the agenda items was then held from Thursday 9 March 2006 through Midnight Sunday 12 March 2006 Rome time.

On 13th of March the latest session of the Senate of Nova Roma closed, in which 32 of the 37 senatores voted, fulfilling the quorum needed for the session.

Here are the list of the voting Senators, listed alphabetically by nomen:

[MAGG] Marcus Antonius Gryllus Graecus
[SAS] Sextus Apollonius Scipio
[FAC] Franciscus Apulus Caesar
[MAM] Marcus Arminius Maior
[MCS] Manius Constantinus Serapio
[CCS] Caius Curius Saturninus
[ECF] Emilia Curia Finnica
[GEM] Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
[LECA] Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus Augur
[GFBM] Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
[CFBQ] Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
[QFM] Quintus Fabius Maximus
[CFD] Caius Flavius Diocletianus
[TGP] Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
[MIP] Marcus Iulius Perusianus
[DIPI] Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus
[TLF] Titus Labienus Fortunatus
[GL] Gaia Livia
[CMM] Gaius Marius Merullus
[MMA] Marcus Minucius Audens
[LMS] Lucius Minicius Sceptius
[PMS] Pompeia Minucia Strabo
[AMA] Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia
[MOG] Marcus Octavius Germanicus
[TOPA] Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus
[GPL] Gaius Popillius Laenas
[GSA] Gnaeus Salvius Astur
[JSM] Julilla Sempronia Magna
[LSA] Lucius Sergius Australicus
[QSP] Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
[ATMC] Appius Tullius Marcellus Cato
[FVG] Flavius Vedius Germanicus

The following senatores failed to vote in this session:


[MBA] Marcus Bianchius Antonius
[PC] Patricia Cassia
[GMHF] Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix resigned prior to the Senate session
[LAF] Lucius Arminius Faustus
[MCJ] Marcus Cassius Julianus
[LCSF] Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix

With the resignation of Senator Minucius Hadrianus prior to the call for the Senate to meet, there were 37 senatores. The quorum was therefore 25 senatores voting. Thirty-two (32) senatores voted; a quorem was met.

The items for consideration were as follow below. A majority of the Senatores (19) was required to pass each item:


Item I: The revised budged for Nova Roma for 2759 A.U.C. shall be adopted.

MAGG: VTI ROGAS
SAS: UTI ROGAS
FAC: VTI ROGAS
MAM: Uti Rogas
MCS: ABSTINEO
ECF: Uti rogas.
CCS: Uti Rogas
LECA: Abstained
GEM: VTI ROGAS
CFBM: UTI ROGAS
CFBQ: UTI ROGAS
QFM: Abstaino
CFD: Uti Rogas
TGP VTI ROGAS
MIP:VTI ROGAS
DIPI: Abstained
TLF: VTI ROGAS
CMM: Vti rogas
GL: UTI ROGAS
MMA:UTI ROGAS
LMS: ABSTINEO
PMS: VTI ROGAS
AMA: VTI ROGAS
MOG: VTI ROGAS
TOPA: UTI ROGAS
GPL: VTI ROGAS
GSA: VTI ROGAS
JSM: VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti rogas
QSP VTI ROGAS
ATC: Uti Rogas
FVG: VTI ROGAS

Item I passed with 27 in favor, 5 abstaining.


Item II Franciscus Apulus Caesar is to be prorogued as Propraetor Italia.


MAGG: VTI ROGAS
SAS: UTI ROGAS
FAC: ABSTINEO
MAM: Uti Rogas
MCS: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas.
CCS: Uti Rogas
LECA: VTI ROGAS
GEM: VTI ROGAS
CFBM: UTI ROGAS
CFBQ: UTI ROGAS
QFM: Vti Rogas Except it would be a Proconsulship.
CFD: Uti Rogas
TGP VTI ROGAS
MIP:VTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti Rogas
TLF: VTI ROGAS
CMM: Vti rogas
GL: UTI ROGAS
MMA:UTI ROGAS

LMS: VTI·ROGAS
PMS: VTI ROGAS
AMA: VTI ROGAS
MOG: VTI ROGAS
TOPA: UTI ROGAS
GPL: VTI ROGAS
GSA: VTI ROGAS
JSM: VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti rogas
QSP VTI ROGAS
ATC: Uti Rogas
FVG: VTI ROGAS


Item II passed with 31 in favor, 1 abstaining.


Item III G. Cornelius Lentulus is to be prorogued as Propraetor Pannonia.

MAGG: VTI ROGAS
SAS: UTI ROGAS
FAC VTI ROGAS: A very skilled governor
MAM: Uti Rogas
MCS: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas.
CCS: Uti Rogas
LECA: VTI ROGAS
GEM: VTI ROGAS
CFBM: UTI ROGAS
CFBQ: UTI ROGAS
QFM: Vti Rogas A bright informed man whom I had the pleasure of speaking with recently.

CFD: Uti Rogas
TGP VTI ROGAS
MIP:VTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti Rogas
TLF: VTI ROGAS
CMM: Vti rogas
GL: UTI ROGAS
MMA:UTI ROGAS

LMS: VTI·ROGAS
PMS: VTI ROGAS
AMA: VTI ROGAS
MOG: VTI ROGAS
TOPA: UTI ROGAS
GPL: VTI ROGAS
GSA: VTI ROGAS
JSM: VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti rogas
QSP VTI ROGAS
ATC: Uti Rogas
FVG: VTI ROGAS


Item III passed with 32 in favor.


Item IV Titus Iulius Sabinus is to be prorogued as Propraetor Dacia.


MAGG: VTI ROGAS
SAS: UTI ROGAS
FAC: VTI ROGAS: he's doing an excellent job
MAM: Uti Rogas
MCS: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas.
CCS: Uti Rogas
LECA: VTI ROGAS
GEM: VTI ROGAS
CFBM: UTI ROGAS
CFBQ: UTI ROGAS
QFM: Vti Rogas
CFD: Uti Rogas
TGP VTI ROGAS
MIP:VTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti Rogas
TLF: VTI ROGAS
CMM: Vti rogas
GL: UTI ROGAS
MMA:UTI ROGAS

LMS: VTI·ROGAS
PMS: VTI ROGAS
AMA: VTI ROGAS
MOG: VTI ROGAS
TOPA: UTI ROGAS
GPL: VTI ROGAS
GSA: VTI ROGAS
JSM: VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti rogas
QSP VTI ROGAS
ATC: Uti Rogas
FVG: VTI ROGAS


Item IV passed with 32 in favor.


Item V C. Arminius Reccanellus is to be prorogued as Propraetor Brasilia.


MAGG: VTI ROGAS
SAS: UTI ROGAS
FAC: VTI ROGAS
MAM: Uti Rogas
MCS: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas.
CCS: Uti Rogas
LECA: VTI ROGAS
GEM: VTI ROGAS
CFBM: UTI ROGAS
CFBQ: UTI ROGAS
QFM: Vti Rogas
CFD: Uti Rogas
TGP VTI ROGAS
MIP:VTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti Rogas
TLF: VTI ROGAS
CMM: Vti rogas
GL: UTI ROGAS
MMA:UTI ROGAS

LMS: VTI·ROGAS
PMS: VTI ROGAS
AMA: VTI ROGAS
MOG: VTI ROGAS
TOPA: UTI ROGAS
GPL: VTI ROGAS
GSA: VTI ROGAS
JSM: VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti rogas
QSP VTI ROGAS
ATC: Uti Rogas
FVG: VTI ROGAS

Item V passed with 32 in favor.


Item VI M. Curiatius Complutensis is to be prorogued as Propraetor Hispania.

MAGG: VTI ROGAS
SAS: UTI ROGAS
FAC: VTI ROGAS: My congratulations for the growth of Hispania
MAM: Uti Rogas
MCS: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas.
CCS: Uti Rogas
LECA: VTI ROGAS
GEM: VTI ROGAS
CFBM: UTI ROGAS
CFBQ: UTI ROGAS
QFM: Vti Rogas
CFD: Uti Rogas
TGP VTI ROGAS
MIP:VTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti Rogas
TLF: VTI ROGAS
CMM: Vti rogas
GL: UTI ROGAS
MMA:UTI ROGAS

LMS: VTI·ROGAS
PMS: VTI ROGAS
AMA: VTI ROGAS
MOG: VTI ROGAS
TOPA: UTI ROGAS
GPL: VTI ROGAS
GSA: VTI ROGAS
JSM: VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti rogas
QSP VTI ROGAS
ATC: Uti Rogas
FVG: VTI ROGAS

Item VI passed with 32 in favor.


Item VII Pompeia Minucia Strabo is to be prorogued as Propraetrix Canada Orientalis.

MAGG: VTI ROGAS
SAS: UTI ROGAS
FAC: VTI ROGAS
MAM: Uti Rogas
MCS: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas.
CCS: Uti Rogas
LECA: VTI ROGAS
GEM: VTI ROGAS
CFBM: UTI ROGAS
CFBQ: UTI ROGAS
QFM: Vti Rogas Again, this would be a Proconsulship.
CFD: Uti Rogas
TGP VTI ROGAS
MIP:VTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti Rogas
TLF: VTI ROGAS
CMM: Vti rogas
GL: UTI ROGAS
MMA:UTI ROGAS

LMS: VTI·ROGAS
PMS: Abstained
AMA: VTI ROGAS
MOG: VTI ROGAS
TOPA: UTI ROGAS
GPL: VTI ROGAS
GSA: VTI ROGAS
JSM: VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti rogas
QSP VTI ROGAS
ATC: Uti Rogas
FVG: VTI ROGAS


Item VII passed with 31 in favor, one abstaining.


Item VIII Sextus Apollonius Scipio is to be prorogued as Propraetor Gallia.


MAGG: VTI ROGAS
SAS: Abstineo
FAC: VTI ROGAS
MAM: Uti Rogas
MCS: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas.
CCS: Uti Rogas
LECA: VTI ROGAS
GEM: VTI ROGAS
CFBM: UTI ROGAS
CFBQ: UTI ROGAS
QFM: Vti Rogas
CFD: Uti Rogas
TGP VTI ROGAS
MIP:VTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti Rogas
TLF: VTI ROGAS
CMM: Vti rogas
GL: UTI ROGAS
MMA:UTI ROGAS

LMS: VTI·ROGAS
PMS: VTI ROGAS
AMA: VTI ROGAS
MOG: VTI ROGAS
TOPA: UTI ROGAS
GPL: VTI ROGAS
GSA: VTI ROGAS
JSM: VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti rogas
QSP VTI ROGAS
ATC: Uti Rogas
FVG: VTI ROGAS

Item VIII passed with 31 in favor, one abstaining.


Item IX Caius Curius Saturninus is to be prorogued as Propraetor Thule.


MAGG: VTI ROGAS
SAS: UTI ROGAS
FAC: VTI ROGAS
MAM: Uti Rogas
MCS: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas.
CCS: Uti Rogas
LECA: VTI ROGAS
GEM: VTI ROGAS
CFBM: UTI ROGAS
CFBQ: UTI ROGAS
QFM: Vti Rogas
CFD: Uti Rogas
TGP VTI ROGAS
MIP:VTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti Rogas
TLF: VTI ROGAS
CMM: Vti rogas
GL: UTI ROGAS
MMA:UTI ROGAS

LMS: VTI·ROGAS
PMS: VTI ROGAS
AMA: VTI ROGAS
MOG: VTI ROGAS
TOPA: UTI ROGAS
GPL: VTI ROGAS
GSA: VTI ROGAS
JSM: VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti rogas
QSP VTI ROGAS
ATC: Uti Rogas
FVG: VTI ROGAS

Item IX passed with 32 in favor.


Item X Salvia Sempronia Graccha Valentia is to be prorogued Propraetrix America Media Occidentalis Superior.

MAGG: VTI ROGAS
SAS: UTI ROGAS
FAC: ABSTINEO: I don't know her directly
MAM: Uti Rogas
MCS: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas.
CCS: Uti Rogas
LECA: VTI ROGAS
GEM: VTI ROGAS
CFBM: UTI ROGAS
CFBQ: UTI ROGAS
QFM: Vti Rogas
CFD: Uti Rogas
TGP VTI ROGAS
MIP:ABSTINEO
DIPI: Uti Rogas
TLF: VTI ROGAS
CMM: Vti rogas
GL: UTI ROGAS
MMA:UTI ROGAS

LMS: VTI·ROGAS
PMS: VTI ROGAS
AMA: VTI ROGAS
MOG: VTI ROGAS
TOPA: UTI ROGAS
GPL: VTI ROGAS
GSA: VTI ROGAS
JSM: VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti rogas
QSP VTI ROGAS
ATC: Uti Rogas
FVG: VTI ROGAS

Item X passed with 30 in favor, two abstaining.


Item XI Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus is to be prorogued Propraetor Lacus Magni.

MAGG: VTI ROGAS
SAS: UTI ROGAS
FAC: VTI ROGAS
MAM: Uti Rogas
MCS: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas.
CCS: Uti Rogas
LECA: VTI ROGAS
GEM: VTI ROGAS
CFBM: UTI ROGAS
CFBQ: UTI ROGAS
QFM: Vti Rogas
CFD: Uti Rogas
TGP VTI ROGAS
MIP: ABSTINEO
DIPI: Uti Rogas
TLF: VTI ROGAS
CMM: Vti rogas
GL: UTI ROGAS
MMA:UTI ROGAS

LMS: VTI·ROGAS
PMS: VTI ROGAS
AMA: VTI ROGAS
MOG: VTI ROGAS
TOPA: UTI ROGAS
GPL: VTI ROGAS
GSA: VTI ROGAS
JSM: VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti rogas
QSP VTI ROGAS
ATC: Uti Rogas
FVG: VTI ROGAS


Item XI passed with 31 in favor, one abstaining


Item XII Marcus Minucius Audens is to be prorogued Propraetor Nova Britannia.


MAGG: VTI ROGAS
SAS: UTI ROGAS
FAC: VTI ROGAS
MAM: Uti Rogas
MCS: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Abstineo.
CCS: Abstineo
LECA: VTI ROGAS
GEM: VTI ROGAS
CFBM: UTI ROGAS
CFBQ: UTI ROGAS
QFM: Vti Rogas
CFD: Uti Rogas
TGP VTI ROGAS
MIP:VTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti Rogas
TLF: VTI ROGAS
CMM: Vti rogas
GL: UTI ROGAS
MMA: ABSTO

LMS: VTI·ROGAS
PMS: VTI ROGAS
AMA: VTI ROGAS
MOG: VTI ROGAS
TOPA: UTI ROGAS
GPL: VTI ROGAS
GSA: VTI ROGAS
JSM: VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti rogas
QSP VTI ROGAS
ATC: Uti Rogas
FVG: VTI ROGAS


Item XII passed with 29 in favor, three abstaining.


Item XIII Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia is to be prorogued Propraetrix Amercia Austrooccidentalis.


MAGG: VTI ROGAS
SAS: UTI ROGAS
FAC: VTI ROGAS
MAM: Uti Rogas
MCS: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas.
CCS: Uti Rogas
LECA: VTI ROGAS
GEM: VTI ROGAS
CFBM: UTI ROGAS
CFBQ: UTI ROGAS
QFM: Vti Rogas
CFD: Uti Rogas
TGP VTI ROGAS
MIP:VTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti Rogas
TLF: VTI ROGAS
CMM: Vti rogas
GL: UTI ROGAS
MMA:UTI ROGAS

LMS: VTI·ROGAS
PMS: VTI ROGAS
AMA: Abstained
MOG: VTI ROGAS
TOPA: UTI ROGAS
GPL: VTI ROGAS
GSA: VTI ROGAS
JSM: VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti rogas
QSP VTI ROGAS
ATC: Uti Rogas
FVG: Abstained

Item XIII passed with 30 in favor, two abstaining.


Item XIV This item serves as an option to the Senatores to write in any existing Governor by name for proroguement who either:

[Note of Tribunus Plebis: three former propraetores in particular were considered for write-in by some of the Senatores. Those Senatores who wrote in one of the names are indicated below.]

For Quintus Fabius Maximus as proconsul in California

LECA
QFM
CFD
TGP
DIPI: A long serving and faithful governor
TLF
CMA
MMA
GPL
LSA
QSP
ATC
FVG

With 13 write-in votes, Q. Fabius Maximus was not prorogued.

Additional comments: although the question was only whether to write in a name or not, some Senatores elected to voice their opposition to Proconsul Q. Fabius Maximus being prorogued. Other Senatores chose to voice their support.

FAC: ANTIQVO California need a new active governor
ECF: Antiquo.
CCS: ANTIQUO
CFBQ: ANTIQUO.
QFM: Roman tradition allows me to vote for myself. I am dismayed at the people who wrote in my name in order to be sure that they could vote “no” against me. I have never seen such vindictiveness in my life. I only once voted no on a prorogument, and that was because the person had made damaging remarks about Nova Roma in public while holding the Praetorship. When it comes to running the Republic, I put my personal animosities aside. Apparently these individuals are unable to do so. And that is unfortunate.
LMS: As far as I know, there is a Consular Edictvm saying the deadline is February 15th. Therefore, any comunication done after that date is out of the law. Due to this argument, both Fabia Livia and Fabius Maximus wouldn't be prorogued. But there is a difference between them two. Fabia Livia has sent messages with great concern and respect and as far as I know she is doing a good job in Britannia. On the other hand, I don't see the same concern and respect for the Senators and Cives from Fabius
Maximus. Being a Propraetor means to respect both the power who appoints you (Senate) and the cives you are going to manage. And that gravitas is something I don't find in Fabius Maximus, but in Fabia Livia.
TOPA: ANTIQUO
ATC: There has been some statements made questioning the worthiness of this honorable gentleman for this position. However, having learned a bit over the years about his life and responsibilities in the Macro World as well as his responsiblities
in Nova Roma, I respect him, and will support him.



For Gnaeus Equitius Marinus remaining proconsul in America Mediatlantica until a replacement is chosen by the Senate

MAGG
SAS
FAC
MCS
ECF
CCS
LECA
GEM
CFBM
CFBQ
QFM
CFD
DIPI
TLF
GL
MMA

PMS
MOG
TOPA
GPL
JSM
LSA
ATC

With 23 write-in votes Gn. Equitius Matrinus is prorogued.

Additional comments

Palladius (DIPI): I understand he wants to step down but agree to this temporary measure he suggested until candidates to replace him are lined up.



For Gaia Livia as propraetrix in Britannia

MAGG
SAS
FAC
MCS
ECF
CCS
LECA
GEM
CFBM
CFBQ
QFM
CFD
TGP
MIP
DIPI
TLF
GL
MMA
LMS
PMS
MOG
TOPA
GPL
GSA
JSM
LSA
QSP
ATC


With 28 write-in votes Gaia Livia is prorogued.


Item XV: Marcus Iulius Severus shall be appointed Propraetor Provincia Mexico

MAGG: VTI ROGAS
SAS: UTI ROGAS
FAC: VTI ROGAS
MAM: Uti Rogas
MCS: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas.
CCS: Uti Rogas
LECA: VTI ROGAS
GEM: VTI ROGAS
CFBM: UTI ROGAS
CFBQ: UTI ROGAS
QFM: Vti Rogas
CFD: Uti Rogas
TGP VTI ROGAS
MIP:ABSTINEO
DIPI: Uti Rogas
TLF: VTI ROGAS
CMM: Vti rogas
GL: UTI ROGAS
MMA:UTI ROGAS

LMS: VTI ROGAS
PMS VTI ROGAS
AMA: VTI ROGAS
MOG: VTI ROGAS
TOPA: UTI ROGAS
GPL: VTI ROGAS
GSA: VTI ROGAS
JSM: VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti rogas
QSP VTI ROGAS
ATC: Uti Rogas
FVG: VTI ROGAS


Item XV passed with 31 in favor, one abstaining.


Item XVI: Gn. Iulius Caesar shall be appointed Propraetor Provincia Canada Occidentalis

MAGG: VTI ROGAS
SAS: UTI ROGAS
FAC: ABSTINEO
MAM: Uti Rogas
MCS: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Abstineo
CCS: Abstineo
LECA: VTI ROGAS
GEM: VTI ROGAS
CFBM: ABSTO
CFBQ: ABSTO
QFM: Vti Rogas An excellent choice to replace the active Q Suetonius Paulinus. I believe they both live in the same city
CFD: Uti Rogas
TGP VTI ROGAS
MIP:VTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti Rogas: An excellent choice to replace Suetonius Paulinus, one who has made his mark on Nova Roma since he first appeared on the scene.
TLF: VTI ROGAS
CMM: Vti rogas
GL: UTI ROGAS
MMA:UTI ROGAS

LMS: VTI ROGAS
PMS: Abstained
AMA: VTI ROGAS
MOG: VTI ROGAS
TOPA: ABSTINEO
GPL: VTI ROGAS
GSA: VTI ROGAS
JSM: VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti rogas
QSP VTI ROGAS
ATC: Uti Rogas
FVG: VTI ROGAS

Item XVI passed with 25 in favor, 7 abstaining.


QUOD BONUM FAUSTUM FELIXQUE SIT


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42661 From: G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana Date: 2006-03-13
Subject: Re: NewRoman List
G. Aurelia Falconis Sivlan M. Mari Aculeo omnibusgque SPD.

I have recommended before, and will again, at the risk of being
flamed:

If you are reading this, you are subscribed to the list. You do not
need to put up with a flood of e-mail in your inbox as a result of
that subscription.

At the top of this page, click on EDIT MEMBERSHIP. Then at the bottom
of the membership page under MESSAGE DELIVERY select how you want to
communicate with the list.

Check **NO E-MAIL: I'LL READ MESSAGES ON THE WEB SITE**

Presto! a clean inbox. You can always forward really interesting
e-mails to yourself from the ML while perusing it. You'll spend
less time doing that than purging your inbox of material you find
not worth storing. You can visit the ML when you choose, not
every time you tackle your inbox. I bookmark all my NR groups for
convenience.

And unlike your inbox, the ML site has a sidebar that reminds you
of other content: files, photos, polls, etc.

I hope this eases a few new members' concerns about the volune on this
list.

Vale, et valete bene in pace Deorum.

G. Aurelia Falconis Silvana


-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, duy mai <duybears@...> wrote:
>
> hmmm... that's a good idea. i'm also a new citizen (as of the
other day in fact). the volume of negativity filling my mailbox was
definately a turn off. i wouldn't blame Nova Roma as it seems like an
internet phenomena. i'll give the NewRoman list a try and see how it
goes.
>
> by the way, i made a point not to check my speeling. ;-)
>
> Marcus Marius Aculeo.
>
>
>
> On Mar 9, 2006, at 10:23 PM, M. Lucretius Agricola wrote:
>
> > M. Lucretius Agricola to new citizens in particular, many
> > greetings.
> >
> > I have said before that the worst mistake a new citizen can make
> > is to jump straight into the Main List. Doing so is like arriving
> > in a new city and going straight to the courthouse. You risk
> > finding yourself in the middle of a "trial of the century" with no
> > way to get a handle on the background issues.
> >
> > I urge all new citizens to visit the (peaceful, moderated)
> > NewRoman list at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newroman/ where
> > experienced citizens are waiting to answer your questions or in
> > any other way help you get your bearings in our Res Publica.
> >
> > I assure you that many good things go on "in" Nova Roma that do
> > not appear here, on this Main List.
> >
> > optime valete in pace deorum!
> >
<snip>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42662 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-13
Subject: a.d. III Id. Mar. (the real one)
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem III Idus Martias; haec dies endotercisus est.


"He then returned back and came to Jericho, in such a melancholy state
of body as almost threatened him with present death, when he proceeded
to attempt a horrid wickedness; for he got together the most
illustrious men of the whole Jewish nation, out of every village, into
a place called the Hippodrome, and there shut them in. He then called
for his sister Salome, and her husband Alexas, and made this speech to
them: 'I know well enough that the Jews will keep a festival upon my
death however, it is in my power to be mourned for on other accounts,
and to have a splendid funeral, if you will but be subservient to my
commands. Do you but take care to send soldiers to encompass these men
that are now in custody, and slay them immediately upon my death, and
then all Judea, and every family of them, will weep at it, whether
they will or no.'

These were the commands he gave them; when there came letters from his
ambassadors at Rome, whereby information was given that Acme was put
to death at Caesar's command, and that Antipater was condemned to die;
however, they wrote withal, that if Herod had a mind rather to banish
him, Caesar permitted him so to do. So he for a little while revived,
and had a desire to live; but presently after he was overborne by his
pains, and was disordered by want of food, and by a convulsive cough,
and endeavored to prevent a natural, death; so he took an apple, and
asked for a knife for he used to pare apples and eat them; he then
looked round about to see that there was nobody to hinder him, and
lift up his right hand as if he would stab himself; but Achiabus, his
first cousin, came running to him, and held his hand, and hindered him
from so doing; on which occasion a very great lamentation was made in
the palace, as if the king were expiring. As soon as ever Antipater
heard that, he took courage, and with joy in his looks, besought his
keepers, for a sum of money, to loose him and let him go; but the
principal keeper of the prison did not only obstruct him in that his
intention, but ran and told the king what his design was; hereupon the
king cried out louder than his distemper would well bear, and
immediately sent some of his guards and slew Antipater; he also gave
order to have him buried at Hyrcanium, and altered his testament
again, and therein made Archclaus, his eldest son, and the brother of
Antipas, his successor, and made Antipas tetrarch." - Josephus, The
War of The Jews I.6-7

"I would rather be Herod's pig than Herod's son." - Augustus
Caesar(attr.), remarking upon the fact that Herod routinely killed his
sons but, being Jewish, would not touch a pig.


On this day in 4 B.C., King Herod "the Great" died. Herod was born 73
B.C. as the son of a man from Idumea named Antipater and a woman named
Cyprus, the daughter of an Arabian sheik. Antipater was an adherent of
Hyrcanus, one of two princes who struggling to become king of Judaea.
In this conflict, the Roman general Pompey intervened in Hyrcanus'
favor. Having favored the winning side in the conflict, Antipater's
star rose, especially since he cooperated with the Romans as much as
possible. In the civil war between Pompey and Julius Caesar, Hyrcanus
and Antipater sided with the latter, for which especially the courtier
was rewarded: in 47, he was appointed epitropos ('regent') and
received the Roman citizenship.

It was obvious that Antipater was the real power behind Hyrcanus'
throne. He managed to secure the appointment of his young son Herod to
the important task of governor of Galilee. The boy, who was only
sixteen years old, launched a small crusade against bandits, which
made him very popular with the populace and impopular with the Sanhedrin.

On March 15, 44 B.C., Caesar was murdered. The new leaders in Rome
were Caesar's nephew Octavian and Caesar's powerful second-in-command
Mark Antony. They announced that they would punish Caesar's murderers,
Brutus and Cassius, who fled to the East. Cassius ordered all
provinces and principalities to pay money for their struggle against
Octavian and Mark Antony, and Judaea had to pay some 15,000 kg of
silver. Antipater and his sons had to take harsh measures to get the
money, and in the ensuing troubles, Antipater was killed. With Roman
help, Herod killed his father's murderer. In 43, Hyrcanus' nephew
Antigonus tried to obtain the throne. Herod defeated him, and secured
the continuity of the line of Hyrcanus by marrying his daughter
Mariamme. Of course, the young man was not blind to the fact that this
marriage greatly enhanced his own claim to the throne.

Meanwhile, Octavian and Mark Antony had defeated Brutus and Cassius
(at Philippi, in 42). Herod managed to convince Mark Antony, who made
a tour through the eastern provinces that had supported Caesar's
murderers, that his father had been forced to support their side. The
Roman leader was convinced, and awarded Herod with the title of
tetrarch of Galilee, a title that was commonly used for the leaders of
parts of vassal kingdoms. (Herod's brother Phasael was to be tetrarch
of Jerusalem; Hyrcanus remained the Jewish national leader in name only.)

This appointment caused a lot of resentment among the Jews. After all,
Herod was not a Jew. He was the son of a man from Idumea; and although
Antipater had been a pious man who had worshipped the Jewish God
sincerely, the Jews had always looked down upon the Idumeans as
racially impure. Worse, Herod had an Arabian mother, and it was
commonly held that one could only be a Jew when one was born from a
Jewish mother. When war broke out between the Romans and the Parthians
(in Iran and Mesopotamia), the Jewish populace joined the latter. In
40, Hyrcanus was taken prisoner and brought to the Parthian capital
Babylon; Antigonus became king in his place; Phasael committed suicide.

Herod managed to escape and went to Rome, where he persuaded Octavian
and the Senate to order Mark Antony to restore him. And so it
happened. After Mark Antony and his lieutenants had driven away the
Parthians, Herod was brought back to Jerusalem by two legions, VI
Ferrata (whose men had already fought in Gaul and the civil wars) and
another legion, perhaps III Gallica (37 B.C.). Antigonus was defeated
and after he had besieged and captured Jerusalem, and had defeated the
last opposition (more), Herod could start his reign as sole ruler of
Judaea. He assumed the title of basileus, the highest possible title.

From February 1 B.C. to May 1 B.C. there were 3 months of a "Guiding
Star" due to a near-conjunction of Jupiter-Regulus that was highly
visible in the night sky. This was followed by a conjunction of
Jupiter and Venus in June 17-18 of 1 B.C., which may have been
interpreted by astonomer-priests as the sign of the birth of Christ
when the blazing "star" of the gods Iuppiter and Venus were merged in
the heavens, the home of the gods. The annunciation could then have
been delayed until March of 1 A.D., on or near the spring solstice, an
important time when all royalty, especially Kings, were announced for
birth, so as to rightfully inherit the spirits of their ancestors and
kingly predecessors during the springtime spiritual resurrection of
all life.

Herod has entered posterity as a ruthless ruler and on account of his
cruelty, not least to close members of his own family; but he was also
an able and far-sighted administrator who helped in building the
economic might of Judaea, founding cities and developing agricultural
projects, his most famous and ambitious project having been the
rebuilding of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem to the most beautiful in
its time in order to ingratiate himself with the many of his subjects
who were Jews by descent.

Some of Herod's other achievements include: the rebuilding the water
supplies for Jerusalem, rebuilding the Palace in Jerusalem,
refurbishing the boundary fortresses such as Masada, and creating new
cities such as Caesarea Maritima and Herodion. He also had a fortress
built called the Herodium. From the extraction of asphalt from the
Dead Sea, he shared with Cleopatra the monopoly on its important use
in ship building. He leased copper mines on Cyprus from the Roman
emperor. He had a dominant position in the production of bronze, using
British tin.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Josephus, Herod (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herod_the_Great)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42663 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-03-13
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Salve Scaevola

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Benjamin A. Okopnik" <ben@...>
wrote:
>
> > Bottom line is that a civis has a right to pursue
> > claims against other cives if he or she so wishes. It is not a
> > right to be used frivolously, nor is it a right that should be
> > summarily dismissed.
>
> My problem with the process as it stands is that there's protection
> against the latter - but none against the former.
>
>

I agree. The only other protection against harassing litigations
that is currently available is the auxilium of the Tribuni Plebis.
Granted, this does not always work either and could conceivably be
abused. What Nova Roma has not done yet, but what was developed in
Roma antiqua because of a problem with harassing litigations, was
the passage of a lex whereby an individual Actor who could not prove
his claim against the Reus would suffer the same penalty as was
intended to be inflicted on the Reus. What I referred to earlier is
that under current circumstances, a Reus in one case could
conceivably file suit against the Actor, reversing roles, with a
claim that the failed attempt at prosecution was an offense that
unjustly sought to curtail the rights of the Reus as a civis. To
avoid more needless litigations, or the need for a new lex, a
Praetor could possibly include in his or her instructions to the
iudices some provision that allowed for them to impose some reactive
penalty on an Actor in their determination of a case. That
provision should require that the iudices also justify such a
determination. I don't think such an instruction should be used
overly often, but it is a possibility to consider.

I agree with the comments made by my colleague Tibunus Plebis
Suetonius Paulinus. There are greater concerns that should be
discussed on the lists. Personal conflicts need to be handled
differently, rather than allow them to disrupt the lists or tolerate
their needlessly tying up our legal system.

What has been used with some success in the past was when the
Praetores, Tribuni Plebis, or in some cases when private individuals
took on the role of mediating disputes. That should be part of any
investigation procedures. It would IMHO come under the "common
sense" provision of current law, since in trying to determine
whether to proceed with an action the Praetor should investigate
other options to resolving a conflict. I would think that the
Praetores have the authority of appointing mediators who would be
acceptable to both parties in any dispute as part of the
preliminaries prior to appointing a tribunal to hear a claim.
Mediation does not alway work, but it is a more effective way of
dealing with some disputes.

Vale optime
M Moravius Piscinus
Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42664 From: Titus Marcius Felix Date: 2006-03-13
Subject: Re: Asking about the roman legions in Lusitania
Salve Gaius Cassius Piso

Eu sou da província brasília e sobre legiões na lusitani. você vai gostar do link abaixo (em portugues).
http://www.marcius.felix.nom.br/TextRead.php?IdText=38
É uma biografia sobre Quintus Sertórius.
Também quero convida-lo a participar do grupo de discursão da Povíncia Brasília.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nrbrasil/

============================

I am of the Brasilia province and on legions in lusitani. you go to like it below link (in Portuguese)
http://www.marcius.felix.nom.br/TextRead.php?IdText=38
It is a biography on Quintus Sertórius.
also I want invites it to participate it of the group of discursão of the Brasilia province

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nrbrasil/


Vale Bene
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
T•MARCIVS•FELIX
LEGATVS•PROVINCIAE•BRASILIAE
QUAESTOR•NOVAE•ROMAE

kari piessa <legio_x_equitata@...> escreveu:
SALVETE OMNES!

I'm a provisional citizen of Nova Roma, very interessed in historical recreation of roman legions. ( in fact I have a military training ).
I would like to ask to everyone who may have a knowlegde about the legionaries (legions) placed in Lusitania, about the historcal facts of roman military activities in the province of Lusitania in order to create a group of historical recriation (legion) in this province.
I already noticed that there is a very small contribution of new-roman members
in Lusitania. ( Maybe a Senador Lusitano could answer to my question: Why there ain't any promotion to create any larger interset among portugues people? The Brazilians are organized, and the spanish people too....).
I would like to ask a guidance of those who already were able to create such an activivity in their homelands: How to create a legion? How to create an interest of someone to join in legion? Which a first pass?
Any idea or historical fact I will be gratefull to recieve!

Gaius Cassius Piso


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis
Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS
Roman empire Ancient history Citizenship test Fall of the roman empire The roman empire

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis
Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42665 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-13
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
M. Lucretius Agricola Tribuno Piscino S.P.D.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Scaevola
>

[SNIP]

> What has been used with some success in the past was when the
> Praetores, Tribuni Plebis, or in some cases when private individuals
> took on the role of mediating disputes. That should be part of any
> investigation procedures. It would IMHO come under the "common
> sense" provision of current law, since in trying to determine
> whether to proceed with an action the Praetor should investigate
> other options to resolving a conflict. I would think that the
> Praetores have the authority of appointing mediators who would be
> acceptable to both parties in any dispute as part of the
> preliminaries prior to appointing a tribunal to hear a claim.
> Mediation does not alway work, but it is a more effective way of
> dealing with some disputes.
>
> Vale optime
> M Moravius Piscinus
> Tribunus Plebis
>

I would strongly support the notion that Praetors would refer
litigants to non-binding mediation as a preliminary step. It is a
sensible procedure that is consistant with the assumption of good
faith on the part of all Citizens.

I urge the Praetors to take note of this wise suggestion on the part
of Tribune Piscinus.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42666 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-03-13
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Salve

Tribune Marcus Horatius said in part

"Personal conflicts need to be handled differently, rather than
allow them to disrupt the lists or tolerate their needlessly tying
up our legal system."

WHAT??

The only people who are keeping this conflict alive on the main list
are the Reus and his supporters. They and they alone are "disrupt
the lists" with this issue. This is long after my request that it be
limited to court list.

As to "their needlessly tying up our legal system." This is the
first court case to be heard in the EIGHT year history of Nova Roma.
The system is not exactly over burdened and is this not why we have
a legal system?

"What has been used with some success in the past was when the
Praetores, Tribuni Plebis, or in some cases when private individuals
took on the role of mediating disputes. That should be part of any
investigation procedures. It would IMHO come under the "common
sense" provision of current law, since in trying to determine
whether to proceed with an action the Praetor should investigate
other options to resolving a conflict. I would think that the
Praetores have the authority of appointing mediators who would be
acceptable to both parties in any dispute as part of the
preliminaries prior to appointing a tribunal to hear a claim.
Mediation does not alway work, but it is a more effective way of
dealing with some disputes."

This was looked in to before the court case was allowed to go
forward. Current law does allow for one of the Tribunes to mediate
disputes if both parties can agree on a tribune AND both are
Plebian.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42667 From: Domitius Constantinus Fuscus Date: 2006-03-13
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Salve Agricola

On 3/13/06, M. Lucretius Agricola <wm_hogue@...> wrote:
>
> I would strongly support the notion that Praetors would refer
> litigants to non-binding mediation as a preliminary step. It is a
> sensible procedure that is consistant with the assumption of good
> faith on the part of all Citizens.
>
> I urge the Praetors to take note of this wise suggestion on the part
> of Tribune Piscinus.
>


Mediation is indeed a valuable resource and was also looked for in the
specific case that raised this topic, but unfortunately it is only possible
between reasonable people, tho. When one comes out with public "I prefer to
die than doing something" or closer statements, usually embellished with
colorful name-calling, mediation is hardly a viable option.

vale,

DCF


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42668 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-03-13
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
Salve Fusce,

What you say may be true, but I was speaking about the general case only.

Optime vale

Agricola



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Domitius Constantinus Fuscus"
<dom.con.fus@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Agricola
>
> On 3/13/06, M. Lucretius Agricola <wm_hogue@...> wrote:
> >
> > I would strongly support the notion that Praetors would refer
> > litigants to non-binding mediation as a preliminary step. It is a
> > sensible procedure that is consistant with the assumption of good
> > faith on the part of all Citizens.
> >
> > I urge the Praetors to take note of this wise suggestion on the part
> > of Tribune Piscinus.
> >
>
>
> Mediation is indeed a valuable resource and was also looked for in the
> specific case that raised this topic, but unfortunately it is only
possible
> between reasonable people, tho. When one comes out with public "I
prefer to
> die than doing something" or closer statements, usually embellished with
> colorful name-calling, mediation is hardly a viable option.
>
> vale,
>
> DCF
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 42669 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-03-13
Subject: Re: De petitione: sundry comments
C. equitius Cato quirites S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

So a Roman, a Carthaginian, and an Egyptian walk into a bar...



Valete,

Cato