Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. June 1-8, 2006

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44070 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-01
Subject: Kal. Iun.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44071 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-01
Subject: Re: HBO's Series "ROME"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44072 From: steve carelli Date: 2006-06-01
Subject: Re: HBO's Series "ROME"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44073 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-02
Subject: post. Kal. Iun. (a.d. IV Non. Iun.)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44074 From: appiusclaudiuspriscus Date: 2006-06-02
Subject: I apologize! I thought I was expelled. Advocate?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44075 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-02
Subject: Re: I apologize! I thought I was expelled. Advocate?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44076 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: I apologize! I thought I was expelled. Advocate?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44077 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: I apologize! I thought I was expelled. Advocate?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44078 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: a.d. III Non. Iun.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44079 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: Roman Memorial Day
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44080 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: A THREAT?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44081 From: lvlarcvs_silvanvs Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: English to Latin?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44082 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44083 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44084 From: lvlarcvs_silvanvs Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44085 From: lvlarcvs_silvanvs Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Nova Roma and Religio Romana.....Prayer....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44086 From: lvlarcvs_silvanvs Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44087 From: Marcus Arminius Maior Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Report of Senate session
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44088 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: Nova Roma and Religio Romana.....Prayer....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44089 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: Report of Senate session
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44090 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44091 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44092 From: Steve Mesnick Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44093 From: Diana (Pagan Federation International) Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: Report of Senate session
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44094 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44095 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Oath of Office of Flavius Galerius Aurelianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44096 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Congratulations to Tb. Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44097 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: Congratulations to Tb. Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44098 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: A THREAT?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44099 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Oath of Office of Tiberius Galerius Paulinus as Praetor of Mediatla
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44100 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: Congratulations to Tb. Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44101 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: Congratulations to Tb. Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44102 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Congratulations to Gens Galeria!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44103 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR JUNE 04, 2006
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44104 From: l_fidelius_graecus Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: Remembering Byzantium: a few facts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44105 From: Steve Mesnick Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44106 From: flavius leviticus Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: Oath of Office of Tiberius Galerius Paulinus as Praetor of Medi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44107 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: Report of Senate session
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44108 From: appiusclaudiuspriscus Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE [to exile Appius Claudius Priscus]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44109 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: prid. Non. Iun.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44110 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: Remembering Byzantium: a few facts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44111 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE [to exile Appius Claudius Priscus]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44112 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE [to exile Appius Claudius Priscus]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44113 From: Tita Artoria Marcella Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE [to exile Appius Claudius Priscus]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44114 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Appius Claudius Priscus--Please contact me.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44115 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Appius Claudius Priscus--Please contact me.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44116 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE [to exile Appius Claudius Priscus]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44117 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: to exile Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44118 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: David Meadow's Explorator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44119 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Non. Iunius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44120 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE [to exile Appius Claudius Priscus]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44121 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE [to exile Appius Claudius Priscus]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44122 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE [to exile Appius Claudius Priscus]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44123 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Appius Claudius Priscus - Petitio Actionis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44124 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Issue of Timing...Tribune Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44125 From: Shadow DarkFyre Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Fwd: Pagan Victory in English Court Law EDITED POST
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44126 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Issue of Timing...Tribune Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44127 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: A REAL DANGER
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44128 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Issue of Timing...Tribune Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44129 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Trial
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44130 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Tribunal E-Mail List - Petitio Actionis against Appius Claudius Pri
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44131 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Issue of Timing...Tribune Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44132 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Issue of Timing...Tribune Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44133 From: Stefanie Beer Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Trial
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44134 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Trial
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44135 From: lvl_silvanvs Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: New Application.......
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44136 From: appiusclaudiuspriscus Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Appius Claudius Priscus--Please contact me.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44137 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: New Application.......
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44138 From: appiusclaudiuspriscus Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Appius Claudius Priscus--Please contact me.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44139 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: The Intercessio Debate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44140 From: Richard Sciarappa Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: New Application.......
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44141 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: The Intercessio Debate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44142 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: New Application.......
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44143 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: The Intercessio Debate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44144 From: Stefanie Beer Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Betreff: Re: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Trial
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44145 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Appius Claudius Priscus other email address Moderators
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44146 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44147 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: The Intercessio Debate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44148 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44149 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: The Intercessio Debate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44150 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: The Intercessio Debate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44151 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Help Please, Philosophy and Virtue Lists?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44152 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44153 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44154 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44155 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44156 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Help Please, Philosophy and Virtue Lists?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44157 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44158 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44159 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44160 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: The Intercessio Debate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44161 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44162 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44163 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44164 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: a.d VIII Id. Iun.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44165 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44166 From: caiusmoraviusbrutus Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Talk on Religio Romana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44167 From: David Carey Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: Talk on Religio Romana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44168 From: dicconf Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44169 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44170 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44171 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44172 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44173 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44174 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44175 From: Claudio Guzzo Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: NR in Iraq?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44176 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44177 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44178 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44179 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Edictum Praetorium VIII
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44180 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: New Provisional Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44181 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: New Provisional Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44182 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44183 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: New Provisional Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44184 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44185 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Petitio Actio: G. Equitius Cato/Taurinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44186 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: New Provisional Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44187 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: An Invitation & a slight interruption
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44188 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Petitio Actio: G. Equitius Cato/Taurinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44189 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: New Provisional Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44190 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: New Provisional Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44191 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: a.d. VII Id. Iun.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44192 From: fenris_kiel Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44193 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Petitio Actio: G. Equitius Cato/Taurinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44194 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Petitio Actionis (corrected): G. Equitius Cato/Taurinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44195 From: Brutus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Talk on Religio Romana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44196 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium VIII
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44197 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44198 From: Brutus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Talk on Religio Romana- sorry!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44199 From: appiusclaudiuspriscus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44200 From: Claudio Guzzo Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Priscus and his crimes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44201 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44202 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Off topic posts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44203 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44204 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44205 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44206 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44207 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44208 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium VIII
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44209 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44210 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44211 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium VIII
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44212 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44213 From: rocknrockabilly Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Off topic posts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44214 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44215 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN "IGNOTO"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44216 From: Claudio Guzzo Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: edict against ideas and proposal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44217 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Off topic posts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44218 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44219 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Senatus Consultum de Re Publica Defendenda
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44220 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Off topic posts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44221 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44222 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: A REQUEST TO THE CENSORS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44223 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: A REQUEST TO THE CENSORS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44224 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44225 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: New Provisional Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44226 From: appiusclaudiuspriscus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: I've posted my defense.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44227 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: A REQUEST TO THE CENSORS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44228 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44229 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44230 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On the Priorities of Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44231 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Representing Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44232 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Regarding Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44233 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: New Provisional Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44234 From: Tita Artoria Marcella Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Regarding Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44235 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: New Provisional Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44236 From: Decimus Valerius Thomas Brunus Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Arriving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44237 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Regarding Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44238 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On the Priorities of Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44239 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On the Priorities of Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44240 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: New Provisional Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44241 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Rescindo petitionem actionis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44242 From: flavius leviticus Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On the Priorities of Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44243 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On the Priorities of Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44244 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44245 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: IT'S A SAD DAY



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44070 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-01
Subject: Kal. Iun.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est Kalendas Iunius; haec dies nefastus publicus est.

"Carna, the first day's yours. Goddess of the hinge:
She opens the closed, by her power, closes the open.
The story of how she gained the powers she has is obscured
By time, but you'll still learn of it from my verse.
There's an ancient grove of Alernus near the Tiber:
And the priests still make sacrifices there.
A nymph was born there (men of old called her Cranae)
Who was often sought in vain by many suitors.
She used to hunt the land, chasing wild beasts with spears,
Stretching her woven nets in the hollow valleys.
She'd no quiver, yet considered herself Apollo's
Sister: nor need you, Apollo, have been ashamed of her.
If any youth spoke words of love to her,
She gave him this answer right away:
`There's too much light here, it's too shameful
In the light: if you'll lead to a darker cave, I'll follow.'
While he went in front, credulously, she no sooner reached
The bushes than she hid: and was nowhere to be found.
Janus saw her, and the sight raised his passion.
He used soft words to the hard-hearted nymph.
She told him to find a more private cave,
Followed him closely: then deserted her leader.
Foolish child! Janus can see what happens behind him:
You gain nothing: he looks back at your hiding place.
Nothing gained, as I said, you see! He caught you, hidden
Behind a rock, clasped you, worked his will, then said:
`In return for our union, the hinges belong to you:
Have them as recompense for your maidenhead.'
So saying he gave her a thorn (it was white-thorn)
With which to drive away evil from the threshold.
There are some greedy birds, not those that cheated
Phineus of his meal, though descended from that race:
Their heads are large, their eyes stick out, their beaks
Fit for tearing, their feathers are grey, their claws hooked.
They fly by night, attacking children with absent nurses,
And defiling their bodies, snatched from the cradle.
They're said to rend the flesh of infants with their beaks,
And their throats are full of the blood they drink.
They're called screech-owls, and the reason for the name
Is the horrible screeching they usually make at night.
Whether they're born as birds, or whether they're made so
By spells, old women transformed to birds by Marsian magic,
They still entered Proca's bedroom. Proca was fresh
Prey for the birds, a child of five days old.
They sucked at the infant's chest, with greedy tongues:
And the wretched child screamed for help.
Scared at his cry, the nurse ran to her ward,
And found his cheeks slashed by their sharp claws.
What could she do? The colour of the child's face
Was that of late leaves nipped by an early frost.
She went to Cranae and told her: Cranae said:
`Don't be afraid: your little ward will be safe.'
She approached the cradle: the parents wept:
`Restrain your tears,' she said, `I'll heal him.'
Quickly she touched the doorposts, one after the other,
Three times, with arbutus leaves, three times with arbutus
Marked the threshold: sprinkled the entrance with water,
Medicinal water, while holding the entrails of a two-month sow:
And said: `Birds of night, spare his entrails:
A small victim's offered here for a small child.
Take a heart for a heart, I beg, flesh for flesh,
This life we give you for a dearer life.'
When she'd sacrificed, she placed the severed flesh
In the open air, and forbade those there to look at it.
A `rod of Janus', taken from a whitethorn, was set
Where a little window shed light into the room.
After that, they say, the birds avoided the cradle,
And the boy recovered the colour he'd had before.
You ask why we eat greasy bacon-fat on the Kalends,
And why we mix beans with parched grain?
She's an ancient goddess, nourished by familiar food,
No epicure to seek out alien dainties.
In ancient times the fish still swam unharmed,
And the oysters were safe in their shells.
Italy was unaware of Ionian heath-cocks,
And the cranes that enjoy Pigmy blood:
Only the feathers of the peacock pleased,
And the nations didn't send us captive creatures.
Pigs were prized: men feasted on slaughtered swine:
The earth only yielded beans and hard grains.
They say that whoever eats these two foods together
At the Kalends, in this sixth month, will have sweet digestion.
They also say that the shrine of Juno Moneta was founded
On the summit of the citadel, according to your vow, Camillus:
Before it was built, the house of Manlius had protected
Capitoline Jove against the Gallic weapons.
Great Gods, it would have been better, if he'd fallen,
In defence of your throne, noble Jupiter!
He lived to be executed, condemned for seeking kingship:
That was the crown long years granted him.
This same day is a festival of Mars, whose temple
By the Covered Way is seen from beyond the Capene Gate.
You too, Tempest, were considered worthy of a shrine,
After our fleet was almost sunk in Corsican waters.
These human monuments are obvious. If you look
For stars too, great Jove's eagle, with curved talons, rises." - Ovid,
Fasti VI

"The Sabinoi [Sabines of Italia], since they had long been at war with
the Ombrikoi, vowed to dedicate everything that was produced that
year; and, on winning the victory, they partly sacrificed and partly
dedicated all that was produced; then a dearth ensued, and some one
said that they ought to have dedicated the babies too; this they did,
and devoted to Mars all the children born that year; and these
children, when grown to manhood, they sent away as colonists, and a
bull led the way; and when the bull lay down to rest in the land of
the Opikoi...the Sabinoi ejected them and settled on the spot, and, in
accordance with the utterance of their seers, slaughtered the bull as
a sacrifice to Mars who had given it for a guide." -Strabo 5.4.12

"Ares, to gory strife he speedeth, wroth with foes, when maddeneth his
heart, and grim his frown is, and his eyes flash levin-flame around
him, and his face is clothed with glory of beauty terror-blent, as on
he rusheth: quail the very Gods." - Quintus Smyrnaeus, Fall of Troy 7.400

Today is the Kalends of Iunius; although the month is dedicated to
Iuno, today is specifically held in honor of Mars, the god of war,
known to the Greeks as Ares. Mars, unlike his Greek counterpart, Ares
the god of war, was more widely worshipped than any of the other Roman
gods, probably in part because his sons by the Vestal Virgin Rhea
Silvia, Romulus and Remus, were said to have founded Rome; the Romans
called themselves the sons of Mars. Venus, who was Mars' consort in
legends borrowed from the Greek mythos, held similar importance for
them because of her relationship to Aeneas. Mars was also one of the
three supreme Roman deities of the Archaic Triad, along with Jupiter
and Quirinus.

The primary temple to Mars, dedicated to Mars Gradivus (referring to
Mars' role of preceding the army in battle) was on the northeast side
of the Via Appia outside the Porta Capena, between the first and
second milestones. As a result of the temple, this district came to be
known as ad Martis ("to [the temple] of Mars"). The temple contained a
statue of Mars and probably images of wolves. It was vowed during the
Gallic invasions, and was dedicated c. June 1, 388 BC. It was also the
site where the Roman army gathered before leaving for a war, and was
praised upon returning from victorious battles.

Another major temple to Mars, shared with Jupiter and Quirinus, was on
the Capitoline Hill. Another, the Temple of Mars Ultor ("Mars the
Avenger"), was in the Forum Augustus. It was dedicated in 2 BC by
Augustus, and paid tribute to Mars for supposedly aiding Augustus at
the Battle of Philippi. Yet another temple, designed by a Greek
architect, was built in the Circus Flaminius by Decimus Junius Brutus
Callaicus, probably after his triumph c. 133 BC. It contained a
massive statue of Mars and a naked Venus by Sopas, and the path to the
temple was decorated with verses by the poet Lucius Accius. Julius
Caesar planned to build a titanic temple to Mars on the Naumachia, a
lake used for mock sea battles, but the site was instead used as part
of the location of the Pantheon.

The Campus Martius ("Field of Mars") was dedicated to Mars, and was
where soldiers and athletes trained. Mars also had an altar there, the
Ara Martis. In the Regia on the Roman Forum, the hastae Martiae
("lances of Mars") were kept in a small chamber. Any movement of the
hastae Martiae was seen as an omen of war. If Rome was attacking, the
generals moved their lances and repeated "Mars vigila!" ("Awaken, Mars!").

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Strabo, Quintus Smyrnaeus, Wikipedia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44071 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-01
Subject: Re: HBO's Series "ROME"
A. Apollonius Q. Bianchio omnibusque sal.

> Has anyone been following HBO's series "ROME"? If so, how would you
rate it? Is this something worth buying when released on DVD? <

It's great for creating a sense of what it was like to be in the city of Rome in republican times. In terms of plot it's pretty bad and mostly inaccurate.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44072 From: steve carelli Date: 2006-06-01
Subject: Re: HBO's Series "ROME"
i have been following it.it agreat series and tells the story of julius ceasar very well and acuratly.there are also some great areas the movie where they show how they practised the roman religion.also a good movie out recently is julius ceasar which shows a more early time in julius ceasars life as a child and his rise to power.there is also empire series which takes place after julius death but i dont know how acurate the series is.
stivo julian verus
QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote: In a message dated 5/31/2006 2:57:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
FrBryanReif@... writes:
Has anyone been following HBO's series "ROME"? If so, how would you
rate it? Is this something worth buying when released on DVD?

If its under 80.00 for the 3 disks I believe it is.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history Citizenship test Nova Us citizenship test Citizenship test questions

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44073 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-02
Subject: post. Kal. Iun. (a.d. IV Non. Iun.)
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est postridie Kalendas Iunius (a.d. IV Nonas Iunius); haec dies
fastus aterque est.

"Next light summons the Hyades, the horns on Taurus'
Brow, and then the earth's soaked with heavy rain." - Ovid, Fasti VI

"She [Python] it was who once received from gold-throned Hera and
brought up fell, cruel Typhaon to be a plague to men. Once on a time
Hera bare him because she was angry with father Zeus, when Kronides
bare all-glorious Athene in his head. Thereupon queenly Hera was angry
and spoke among the assembled gods: 'Yes, now I will contrive that a
son be born me to be foremost among the undying gods - and that
without casting shame on the holy bond of wedlock between you and me.
And I will not come to your bed, but will consort with the blessed
gods far off from you.'

When she had so spoken, she went apart from the gods, being very
angry. Then straightway large-eyed queenly Hera prayed, striking the
ground flatwise with her hand, and speaking thus: 'Hear now, I pray,
Gaia and wide Ouranos above, and you Titanes gods who dwell beneath
the earth about great Tartaros, and from whom are sprung both gods and
men! Harken you now to me, one and all, and grant that I may bear a
child apart from Zeus, no wit lesser than him in strength - nay, let
him be as much stronger than Zeus as all-seeing Zeus than Kronos.'
Thus she cried and lashed the earth with her strong hand. Then the
life-giving Gaia was moved: and when Hera saw it she was glad in
heart, for she thought her prayer would be fulfilled. And thereafter
she never came to the bed of wise Zeus for a full year.

But when the months and days were fulfilled and the seasons duly came
on as the earth moved round, she bare one neither like the gods nor
mortal men, fell, cruel Typhaon, to be a plague to men. Straightway
large-eyed queenly Hera took him and bringing one evil thing to
another such, gave him to the drakaina; and she received him. And this
Typhaon used to work great mischief among the famous tribes of men." -
Homeric Hymns 3.300-355

"The peacock made complaint to Juno that, while the nightingale
pleased every ear with his song, he himself no sooner opened his mouth
than he became a laughingstock to all who heard him. The Goddess, to
console him, said, "But you far excel in beauty and in size. The
splendor of the emerald shines in your neck and you unfold a tail
gorgeous with painted plumage." "But for what purpose have I," said
the bird, "this dumb beauty so long as I am surpassed in song?' "The
lot of each," replied Juno, "has been assigned by the will of the
Fates--to thee, beauty; to the eagle, strength; to the nightingale,
song; to the raven, favorable, and to the crow, unfavorable auguries.
These are all contented with the endowments allotted to them." - Aesop

"I sing of golden-throned Hera whom Rhea bare. Queen of the Immortals
is she, surpassing all in beauty: she is the sister and wife of
loud-thundering Zeus, - the glorious one whom all the blessed
throughout high Olympos reverence and honour even as Zeus who delights
in thunder." –Homeric Hymn XII To Hera

"The homage of our song is also due to Hera, the goddess of marriage,
who interests herself in every chorus and guards the approach to the
nuptial couch." - Aristophanes Thesmophoriazusae 970

"The parents of the maidens died because of the wrath of the gods,
that they were reared as orphans by Aphrodite and received gifts from
other goddesses: from Hera wisdom and beauty of form, from Artemis
high stature, from Athena schooling in the works that befit women." -
Pausanias 10.30.1

"When Iuppiter wished to lie with Aegina, the daughter of Asopus, he
feared Juno, and took the girl to the island of Delos, and there made
her pregnant. Aeacus was their son. When Juno found this out, she sent
a serpent into the water which poisoned it, and if anyone drank from
it, he paid the debt to nature. Since Aeacus, his allies lost, could
not protect himself on accou t of the scarcity of men, as he gazed at
some ants, he begged Jupiter to give him men for defense. Then
Iuppiter changed the ants into men." –Hyginus, Fabulae 52

"Zeus fell in love with Semele and slept with her, promising her
anything she wanted, and keeping it all from Hera. But Semele was
deceived by Hera into asking Zeus to come to her as he came to Hera
during their courtship. So Zeus, unable to refuse her, arrived in her
bridal chamber in a chariot with lightning flashes and thunder, and
sent a thunderbolt at her. Semele died of fright, and Zeus grabbed
from the fire her six-month aborted baby [Dionysos], which he sowed
into his thigh. Hermes took him [the baby Dionysos] to Ino and
Athamas, and persuaded them to bring him up as a girl. Incensed, Hera
inflicted madness on them, so that Athamas stalked and slew his elder
son Learkhos on the conviction that he was a deer, while Ino threw
Melikertes into a basin of boiling water, and then, carrying both the
basin and the corpse of the boy, she jumped to the bottom of the sea.
As for Zeus, he escaped Hera's anger by changing Dionysos into a baby
goat. Hermes took him to the Nymphai of Asian Nysa." –Apollodorus 3.26, 28

The month of Iunius is dedicated to Iuno, the great Queen of Heaven,
known to the Greeks as Hera. Iuno rules over all aspects of Roman
life. Besides being called Great Mother, she is also invoked as
"Optima Maxima" meaning best and greatest of the Goddesses. Iuno
watches and protects women from the time they are born until they pass
through the veil. For this reason, Roman women call their souls "iuno"
in honor of the Goddess. Every Roman woman embodied a bit of the
Goddess's spirit, her own soul a iuno, corresponding to the genius of
a man.

As the patroness of marriage, Iuno restores peace between quarreling
couples. One of her temples was used as a sanctuary for women who
needed shelter from cruel husbands. Iuno is one of the most powerful
of the Roman goddesses. She is second in power only to Iuppiter, her
husband and according to some legends, her brother. She was the
goddess of women, particularly married women. Serving as a guardian to
women she oversaw all aspects of a woman's life, childbirth, and
marriage being the primary areas of concern. Iuno Lucina was an
aspect of the goddess Iuno associated with light and childbirth. Her
name lucina probably comes from the Latin lucus (grove). Livy records
that the grove on the Esquiline Hill in which a temple was dedicated
to her in 375 BC is the origin of her name.

By the second century BC Iuno Lucina was associated with childbirth
because the name lucina was thought to have come from the Latin word
lux (light). When a child was born it was said to have been "brought
to light." Women who worshiped Iuno Lucina had to untie knots and
unbraid their hair lest lest these entanglements symbolically block
delivery.

Her children Mars, Hebe, and Vulcan, were lesser gods in their own
right. Juno was noted for her husband's affairs and her jealous
reaction to them. She persistently tormented the offspring of his
infidelities.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Pausanius, Homer, Hyginus, Aesop, Aristophanes, Apollodorus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44074 From: appiusclaudiuspriscus Date: 2006-06-02
Subject: I apologize! I thought I was expelled. Advocate?
Salvete omnes!

I thought I was proscribed and expelled, because in most
organizations, when the top four officials all ask you to resign, you
don't have any de facto rights. I was amazed to learn that NR is
different, that it really is conducted according to law.

Would anyone like to be my advocate if there are proceedings against
my citizenship? I can pay you a year's capitation tax to be my
advocate in the matter for up to one year (it should be resolved much
more quickly than that).

I published the letter asking me to resign, because, being an official
act of the top four officials of NR, it seemed to me to be an edict in
everything but name. Now that I know the letter was honest, I'm
content with the moderator's disposition of the matter.

Valete,
Appius Claudius Priscus


...> He has NOT been expelled from Nova Roma but he was asked to
voluntarily resign...
> Any expulsions and loss of citizenship from Nova Roma will be
conducted according to law.
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44075 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-02
Subject: Re: I apologize! I thought I was expelled. Advocate?
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

Citizens of Nova Roma:

I am sure you are wondering what Appius Claudius Priscus is referring to.
Yes, it is true that he was contacted by me and asked to resign from Nova
Roma on his own free will and accord. He has indicated that he does not
desire to leave, as is his right. Neither I nor the other signers of the
e-mail sent to Priscus, would not have asked him to resign if we did not
feel his presence in Nova Roma was a threat to our well being.

Valete:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Consul

On 6/2/06, appiusclaudiuspriscus <appiusclaudiuspriscus@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes!
>
> I thought I was proscribed and expelled, because in most
> organizations, when the top four officials all ask you to resign, you
> don't have any de facto rights. I was amazed to learn that NR is
> different, that it really is conducted according to law.
>
> Would anyone like to be my advocate if there are proceedings against
> my citizenship? I can pay you a year's capitation tax to be my
> advocate in the matter for up to one year (it should be resolved much
> more quickly than that).
>
> I published the letter asking me to resign, because, being an official
> act of the top four officials of NR, it seemed to me to be an edict in
> everything but name. Now that I know the letter was honest, I'm
> content with the moderator's disposition of the matter.
>
> Valete,
> Appius Claudius Priscus
>
>
> ...> He has NOT been expelled from Nova Roma but he was asked to
> voluntarily resign...
> > Any expulsions and loss of citizenship from Nova Roma will be
> conducted according to law.
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > Praetor
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44076 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: I apologize! I thought I was expelled. Advocate?
Salve Consul,

<I am sure you are wondering what Appius Claudius Priscus is referring to.
Yes, some of us are.

<Yes, it is true that he was contacted by me and asked to resign from Nova
<Roma on his own free will and accord. He has indicated that he does not
<desire to leave, as is his right.

He's right-- we still have laws here.

<Neither I nor the other signers of the
<e-mail sent to Priscus, would not have asked him to resign if we did not
<feel his presence in Nova Roma was a threat to our well being.

Sorry, but this is not correct. My well-being is not being threatened and since none of us even know
what you are talking about, I doubt that there are many who do feel threatened. I'm a moderator of
this list and on the Praetor's staff and even I don't know what exactly is going on.

NR is made up of many different nationalities, cultures and religions, just like Ancient Rome. We
should be open minded to citizens of all opinions, even if they are not in the 'politically correct'
spectrum. That said, this list should not be used to promote macronational political propoganda of
any kind. The Back Alley list, since it is an unofficial NR list, is the place to post it if one
feels the need to share their macro-national political ideas.

In the meantime, the subject matter here should be Rome and Nova Roma.

Vale,
Diana Octavia Aventina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44077 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: I apologize! I thought I was expelled. Advocate?
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Dianae Octaviae Aventinae salutem dicit

"In the meantime, the subject matter here should be Rome and Nova Roma."

Yes, very much so!

Regarding the matter concerned, the individual Appius Claudius Priscus, it
is being discussed by the Senate of Nova Roma.

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 6/3/06, Diana Aventina <diana@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Consul,
>
> <I am sure you are wondering what Appius Claudius Priscus is referring to.
> Yes, some of us are.
>
> <Yes, it is true that he was contacted by me and asked to resign from Nova
> <Roma on his own free will and accord. He has indicated that he does not
> <desire to leave, as is his right.
>
> He's right-- we still have laws here.
>
> <Neither I nor the other signers of the
> <e-mail sent to Priscus, would not have asked him to resign if we did not
> <feel his presence in Nova Roma was a threat to our well being.
>
> Sorry, but this is not correct. My well-being is not being threatened and
> since none of us even know
> what you are talking about, I doubt that there are many who do feel
> threatened. I'm a moderator of
> this list and on the Praetor's staff and even I don't know what exactly is
> going on.
>
> NR is made up of many different nationalities, cultures and religions,
> just like Ancient Rome. We
> should be open minded to citizens of all opinions, even if they are not in
> the 'politically correct'
> spectrum. That said, this list should not be used to promote macronational
> political propoganda of
> any kind. The Back Alley list, since it is an unofficial NR list, is the
> place to post it if one
> feels the need to share their macro-national political ideas.
>
> In the meantime, the subject matter here should be Rome and Nova Roma.
>
> Vale,
> Diana Octavia Aventina


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44078 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: a.d. III Non. Iun.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem III nonas Iunius; haec dies comitialis est.

"When two dawns are past, and Phoebus has risen twice,
And the crops have twice been wet by the dewfall,
On that day, they say, during the Tuscan War, Bellona's
Shrine was consecrated, she who always brings Rome success.
Appius was responsible, who, when peace was denied Pyrrhus,
Saw clearly with his mind, though deprived of sight.
A little open space looks down on the heights of the Circus
From the temple, there's a little pillar there of no mean importance:
The custom is to hurl a spear from there to declare war,
When it's been decided to take up arms against kings and nations." -
Ovid, Fasti VI

"Hard by them stood Enyo, spurred them on ceaselessly: never paused
they from the strife...Eris (strife incarnate) watched and gloated
o'er them." - Quintus Smyrnaeus, Fall of Troy 8.186

"Stalked through the midst deadly Enyo, her shoulders and her hands
blood-splashed, while fearful sweat streamed from her limbs. Revelling
in equal fight, she aided none, lest Thetis' or Ares' wrath be
stirred." - op. cit. 8.286

"The gifts of Ares are swords and brazen tunics to array the limbs and
helmets and spears and whatsoever things Enyo delights in." - Oppian,
Halieutica 2.24

"And Enyo, revelling in the drunkenness of unmixed blood, danced all
night throughout the city, like a hurricane, turbulent with the waves
of the surging war. And therewithal Eris lifted her head high as
heaven and stirred up the Argives; since even bloody Ares, late but
even so, came and brought to the Danaans the changeful victory in
war." - Tryphiodorus, Sack of Ilium 560

"And to Phorkys Keto bore the Graiai, with fair faces and gray from
birth, and these the gods who are immortal and men who walk on the
earth call Graiai, the gray sisters, Pemphredo robed in beauty and
Enyo robed in saffron." - Hesiod, Theogony 270

"So with Hermes and Athene as his guides Perseus sought out the
daughters of Phorkys, who were named Enyo, Pephredo, and Deino. These
daughters of Phorkys and Keto, sisters of the Gorgones, were old women
from their birth. The three of them possessed only one eye and one
tooth among them, which they took turns using. Perseus appropriated
these, and when they demanded them back, he said he would return them
after they had directed him to the nymphs .. When the daughters of
Phorkys had led Perseus to the nymphs, he returned them their tooth
and eye." - Apollodorus, The Library 2.37-39

"Amid the night-wandering shades the god of battle from on high made
to resound with the thunder of arms the Nemean fields and Arcadia from
end to end, and the height of Taenarum and Therapnae...filled excited
hearts with passion for himself. Furor (Fury) and Iraque (Wrath) make
trim his crest, and Pavor (Panic), his own squire, handles his horses'
reins. But Fama (Rumour), awake to every sound and girt with empty
tidings of tumult, flies before the chariot, sped onward by the winged
steeds' panting breath, and with loud whirring shakes out her
fluttering plumes; for the charioteer [Bellona] with blood-stained
goad urges her to speak, be it truth or falsehood, while threatening
from the lofty car the sire [Mars] with Scythian lance assails the
back and tresses of the goddess." - Statius, Thebaid 3.424

"Bellona flashed her sword o'er their heads." - Valerius Flaccus,
Argonautica 2.228

Today is held in honor of the goddess Bellona. In Greek mythology,
Enyo ("horror") was an ancient goddess known by the epithet "Waster of
Cities" and frequently depicted as being covered in blood and carrying
weapons of war. She was frequently portrayed as a companion of Ares,
the chief god of war, and has been variously said to be his mother or
sister. She was occasionally said to be one of the Graeae. Enyo was,
as you have read above, absolutely without remorse or compassion, and
revelled only in slaughter and destruction.

Enyo's Roman counterpart, Bellona, like Ares's counterpart Mars, was
much more popular. She is believed to be one of the numinous gods of
the Romans (without a particular mythology and possibly of Etruscan
origin), and is supposed by many to have been the Romans' original war
deity, predating the identification of Mars with Ares. Her name,
Bellona, is derived from the Latin word for "war" (bellum), and is
directly related to the modern English word "belligerent" (lit.,
"war-bearing"). In art, she is portrayed with a helmet, sword, spear,
and torch.

All Senate meetings relating to foreign war were conducted in the
Templum Bellonae (Temple of Bellona) on the Collis Capitolinus outside
the pomerium. This temple was built in 296 BC and was burned down in
48 BC.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Hesiod, Apollodorus, Statius, Oppian, Quintus Smyrnaeus,
Valerius Flaccius, Wikipedia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44079 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: Roman Memorial Day
Salve et salvete,

Thank you, I'm glad to be back.

Besides Mithraism, I'm also working on some
interesting legal parallels between late Roman
paganism (evolution and recognition of a plurality of
cults and religions out of the capitoline cult so long
as they recognize it and the development of Puranic
Hinduism as a plurality of diverse cults that are
recognized so long as they recognize the "nominal"
authority of the Vedic cult). If the late Roman
religious system of paganism had survived, I
speculate, it would have resembled the religious
culture of India today.

I'm working with others in comparing the development
of Hindu Brahmanic/Vedic law so as to incorporate
other religious movements, vaisnaivite, shivaite,
nath, yoga, tantric (shaiviate,
vaisnaivite-bengali-krsna, Durga) into a "Vedic
system" with the Roman classification and legal
recognition of originally nonRoman cults. In legal
terms, the process is a quite conservative one with
radical results. It is also quite similar in India and
Rome: new cults that recognized the supreme
authority of the Vedic/Capitoline Brahmanic/Patrician
cult were recognized and tolerated (kings and emperors
would even build temples and become devotees in the
new cults). Broadly, "Hinduism" in its legal structure
is not so much a single religion but a multitude of
cults under a single Vedic umbrella like late Rome
was, apart from and before the rise of an exclusivist
Judeo-Christianity.

As Professor Bart Ehman argues in his book, Lost
Christianities: the Christianities We Never Knew,
_all_ forms of the early Christian movements from the
Judean-Jerusalem rooted pauline movement (crucifixion
centered), the northern Galilean Sayings of Jesus as
guru movement (cross has no saving significance), the
ebionite movement (Jesus is not God but messianic
agent - cross just martyrdom), and the gnostics (Jesus
was manifestation of the heavenly sophia - cross
irrelevant to inward illumination) were exclusivist,
even the gnostics - who many of a liberal religious
bent feel drawn to today - were of a "only we have the
true way of salvation and all others (including the
other forms of christianity) are lost" mentality.

Had the Roman religious system survived, the west
would have probably looked much like India -- a
western Hindu-type of religious culture (it was, I
think, Ferguson in his The Religions of Rome that
first suggested this parallel between late Rome and
the development of Puranic Hinduism out of the
classical Brahmanic-Vedic Hinduism).



--- "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@...> wrote:

> A. Apollonius A. Sempronio omnibusque sal.
>
> Welcome back, A. Semproni. Good to see you again.
>


A. Sempronius Regulus



Vincit qui se vincit Astra inclinant, non necessitant. - Albinus
Aequam memento rebus in arduis servare mentem. - Horace
MMDCCLIX Anno urbis conditae (AUC)





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44080 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: A THREAT?
Salvete omnes,

I think that those of us who have been following the still unclear references to Appius Claudius Priscus and his being "a threat to our well being", would like to know why Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Consul and some other authorities in Nova Roma have arrived to that judgement.

Valete optime,

M•IVL•SEVERVS

PROPRÆTOR•PROVINCIƕMEXICO
ROGATOR
INTERPRETER
SCRIBA•CENSORIS•GEM
MVSÆVS•COLLEGII•ERATOVS•SODALITATIS•MVSARVM
SOCIVS•CHORI•MVSARVM


--
_______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.

Powered by Outblaze
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44081 From: lvlarcvs_silvanvs Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: English to Latin?
Im looking for a good online Translator..Ive looked in the Links
section but the one that is listed there doesnt really work,and none
of the ones I've found work well either...I was trying to figure what
the Latin for "Hope,Faith,Charity" and "Faith,Family,Friends" were and
some other things.

Pax!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44082 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
> Salve, et salvete!
>
> Im looking for a good online Translator..Ive looked in the Links
> section but the one that is listed there doesnt really work,and none
> of the ones I've found work well either...I was trying to figure what
> the Latin for "Hope,Faith,Charity" and "Faith,Family,Friends" were and
> some other things.
>
> ATS: Faith, Hope, and Charity: Fides, Spes, et Caritas; Faith, Family,
> and Friends: Fides, Familia, et Amici.
>
> Pax!
>
> Et tecum vobiscumque!
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
> Classicist
> Interpres Linguae Latinae
>
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44083 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
Salvete Omnes!

Now the truth is known: A. Tullia Scholastica is the internet's most
reliable on-line translator of English to Latin!

The NR Wiki has a page of sources for Latin study. The page is a work
in progress but it can be found here:
http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/Reading_list_for_lingua_Latina

Some of the dictionaries are quite inexpensive. The Bantam or the
Collins Gem next to the computer would be found handy by many, I believe.

Optime valete!

Agricola


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
<fororom@...> wrote:
>
> > Salve, et salvete!
> >
> > Im looking for a good online Translator..Ive looked in the Links
> > section but the one that is listed there doesnt really work,and none
> > of the ones I've found work well either...I was trying to figure what
> > the Latin for "Hope,Faith,Charity" and "Faith,Family,Friends" were and
> > some other things.
> >
> > ATS: Faith, Hope, and Charity: Fides, Spes, et Caritas;
Faith, Family,
> > and Friends: Fides, Familia, et Amici.
> >
> > Pax!
> >
> > Et tecum vobiscumque!
> >
> > Vale, et valete,
> >
> > A. Tullia Scholastica
> > Classicist
> > Interpres Linguae Latinae
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44084 From: lvlarcvs_silvanvs Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
Salve!
Thanks for the translations A. Tullia Scholastica..
Pax et Vale!

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
<fororom@...> wrote:
>
> > Salve, et salvete!
> >
> > Im looking for a good online Translator..Ive looked in the Links
> > section but the one that is listed there doesnt really work,and
none
> > of the ones I've found work well either...I was trying to figure
what
> > the Latin for "Hope,Faith,Charity" and "Faith,Family,Friends"
were and
> > some other things.
> >
> > ATS: Faith, Hope, and Charity: Fides, Spes, et Caritas;
Faith, Family,
> > and Friends: Fides, Familia, et Amici.
> >
> > Pax!
> >
> > Et tecum vobiscumque!
> >
> > Vale, et valete,
> >
> > A. Tullia Scholastica
> > Classicist
> > Interpres Linguae Latinae
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44085 From: lvlarcvs_silvanvs Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Nova Roma and Religio Romana.....Prayer....
Salvete!
I read the threads on here about Nova Roma and freedom of
Religion,which is great but couldnt NR or someone that is of a
priestly class create a Website just for Religio Roma,that is
affiliated with NR but not controlled by NR?

I also need some prayers dedicated to Apollo,the Lares and other
household gods..Im not good at creating prayers and any help would be
appreciated..

Vale!
M.Silvanvs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44086 From: lvlarcvs_silvanvs Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
Salvete!M.Lucretius Agricola,
Thanks for the link and the advice...

Vale!
M.Silvanvs
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola"
<wm_hogue@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes!
>
> Now the truth is known: A. Tullia Scholastica is the internet's
most
> reliable on-line translator of English to Latin!
>
> The NR Wiki has a page of sources for Latin study. The page is a
work
> in progress but it can be found here:
> http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/Reading_list_for_lingua_Latina
>
> Some of the dictionaries are quite inexpensive. The Bantam or the
> Collins Gem next to the computer would be found handy by many, I
believe.
>
> Optime valete!
>
> Agricola
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
> <fororom@> wrote:
> >
> > > Salve, et salvete!
> > >
> > > Im looking for a good online Translator..Ive looked in the
Links
> > > section but the one that is listed there doesnt really
work,and none
> > > of the ones I've found work well either...I was trying to
figure what
> > > the Latin for "Hope,Faith,Charity" and "Faith,Family,Friends"
were and
> > > some other things.
> > >
> > > ATS: Faith, Hope, and Charity: Fides, Spes, et Caritas;
> Faith, Family,
> > > and Friends: Fides, Familia, et Amici.
> > >
> > > Pax!
> > >
> > > Et tecum vobiscumque!
> > >
> > > Vale, et valete,
> > >
> > > A. Tullia Scholastica
> > > Classicist
> > > Interpres Linguae Latinae
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44087 From: Marcus Arminius Maior Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Report of Senate session
Tribunus Plebis Marcus Arminius Maior Quiritibus salutem plurimam
dicit:

Report of Senate session

Senate Voting Results, as published on pridie Nonas Iunias MMDCCLIX
A.U.C. (04 June 2006 CE).

The Senate was called to order on May 21, 2006 (2759) by Consul
Pompeia Minucia Strabo.
The Contio was held on agenda items from 24 May 2006 through 28 May 2006.
Voting on the agenda items was then held from 28 May 2006, 20:00,
through 31 May 2006, 20:00 Rome time.

On 31th of May, the latest session of the Senate of Nova Roma was
declared closed by the Consul Pompeia Minucia Strabo, in

which 28 of the 37 senatores voted, fulfilling the quorum needed for
the session.

Here are the list of the voting Senators, alphabetically listed by nomen:


[SAS] Sextus Apollonius Scipio
[FAC] Franciscus Apulus Caesar
[MAM] Marcus Arminius Maior
[MBA] Marcus Bianchius Antonius
[CCS] Caius Curius Saturninus
[ECF] Emilia Curia Finnica
[LECA] Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus Augur
[GFBM] Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
[CFBQ] Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
[QFM] Quintus Fabius Maximus
[CFD] Caius Flavius Diocletianus
[TGP] Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
[MIP] Marcus Iulius Perusianus
[DIPI] Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus
[TLF] Titus Labienus Fortunatus
[MMA] Marcus Minucius Audens
[LMS] Lucius Minicius Sceptius
[PMS] Pompeia Minucia Strabo
[AMA] Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia
[MOG] Marcus Octavius Germanicus
[TOPA] Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus
[GPL] Gaius Popillius Laenas
[GSA] Gnaeus Salvius Astur
[JSM] Julilla Sempronia Magna
[LSA] Lucius Sergius Australicus
[QSP] Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
[ATMC] Appius Tullius Marcellus Cato
[FVG] Flavius Vedius Germanicus

The following senatores failed to vote in this session:

[MAGG] Marcus Antonius Gryllus Graecus
[LAF] Lucius Arminius Faustus
[MCJ] Marcus Cassius Julianus
[PC] Patricia Cassia
[MCS] Manius Constantinus Serapio
[LCSF] Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
[GEM] Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
[GL] Gaia Livia
[GMM] Gaius Marius Merullus

Commments: Senator M. Antonius Gryllus Graecus send his vote before
the voting period, and Senator Gn. Equitius Marinus send his proxy,
that was not effected.

The items for consideration were as follows:


ITEM I: Gubernatorial Candidates

i. Candidates for Mediatlantica Propraetorship. There are two
candidates asking for appointment:
- Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Senator et Praetor is to be appointed
Propraetor Mediatlantica
- Gaius Equitius Cato Curule Aedile is to be appointed Propraetor
Mediatlantica

SAS : Uti Rogas, for Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
FAC : Abstineo.
MAM : Uti Rogas, for Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
MBA : Uti Rogas, for both candidates.
CCS : Uti Rogas, for Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
ECF : Uti Rogas, for Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
LECA: Uti Rogas, for G. Equitius Cato.
CFBM: Uti Rogas, for Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
CFBQ: Uti Rogas, for Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
QFM : Uti Rogas, for G. Equitius Cato.
CFD : Uti Rogas, for G. Equitius Cato.
TGP : Uti Rogas, for Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
MIP : Abstineo.
DIPI: Uti Rogas, for Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
TLF : Uti Rogas, for Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
MMA : Uti Rogas, for both candidates.
LMS : Uti Rogas, for Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
PMS : Uti Rogas, for Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
AMA : Uti Rogas, for Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
MOG : Uti Rogas, for Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
TOPA: Uti Rogas, for Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
GPL : Uti Rogas, for Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
GSA : Uti Rogas, for G. Equitius Cato.
JSM : Uti Rogas, for G. Equitius Cato.
LSA : Uti Rogas, for G. Equitius Cato.
QSP : Uti Rogas, for Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
ATMC: Uti Rogas, for Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
FVG : Uti Rogas, for Ti. Galerius Paulinus.

Candidate Ti. Galerius Paulinus received 20 Uti Rogas, candidate G.
Equitius Cato received 8 uti Rogas, and there were 2

abstentions (2 senatores voted for both).

Congratulation Tiberius Galerius Paulinus, appointed by the Senatus
Propraetor of Provincia Mediatlantica.


Comments from Senatores:

TOPA: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus is clearly the more qualified and
experienced candidate and as such has my vote.
CCS : While both of the candidates have my support, I feel proper to
vote the one which I see as more qualified for the

position. I'm glad to see that there is actually a choice for
propraetorship in provincia, let's hope that in the future too

the Senate has the privilege to choose from many candidates when
filling propraetorships.
LECA: I believe that Cato is most qualified. He is Curule Aedile and
as current Legate to Nova Eboracum Mediatlantica he has proven himself
as Quaestor along with his contributions to the coin project and his
informative daily posts to the Forum.
GFBM: Between the two choices of Cato or Paulinus I believe that
Paulinus is the most qualified. With Paulinus being a current Praetor
it seems only fitting that he should also serve as a provincial governor.
GPL : I have the greatest respect for Gaius Equitius, but I believe
Paulinus to be the better choice at this point. I hope Cato will
continue to serve as a provincial Legate.
JSM : I consider both candidates to be qualified; Cato, however, has
a track record of organising face-to-face meetings of provincials -- a
thing I consider essential to furthering provincial involvement and
commitment to Nova Roma.
DIPI: Nothing against Cato, he has served well so far in his brief
service to the republic but it would be doing a disservice to Nova
Roma and the cursus honorum to appoint an aedile as governor over a
sitting praetor and senator.
QFM : Equitius is qualified, and knowledgeable. I dont agree with
his religious views, but thats the beauty of non discrimination.


ii Candidate for America Austrorientalis Propraetorship
Flavius Galerius Aurelianus Flamen Cerealis is to be appointed
Propraetor America Austrorientalis.

SAS : Uti Rogas.
FAC : Uti Rogas.
MAM : Uti Rogas.
MBA : Uti Rogas.
CCS : Uti Rogas.
ECF : Uti Rogas.
LECA: Uti Rogas.
CFBM: Uti Rogas.
CFBQ: Uti Rogas.
QFM : Uti Rogas.
CFD : Uti Rogas.
TGP : Uti Rogas.
MIP : Uti Rogas.
DIPI: Uti Rogas.
TLF : Uti Rogas.
MMA : Uti Rogas.
LMS : Uti Rogas.
PMS : Uti Rogas.
AMA : Uti Rogas.
MOG : Uti Rogas.
TOPA: Uti Rogas.
GPL : Uti Rogas.
GSA : Uti Rogas.
JSM : Uti Rogas.
LSA : Uti Rogas.
QSP : Uti Rogas.
ATMC: Uti Rogas.
FVG : Uti Rogas.

Candidate Flavius Galerius Aurelianus received 28 Uti Rogas, and is
appointed unanimously.

Congratulations Flavius Galerius Aurelianus, appointed by the
Senatus Propraetor of Provincia America Austrorientalis.


Comments from Senatores:
QFM : Galerius is one of our more active members of NR.



iii Candidate for California Proconsulship
Quintus Fabius Maximus Senator is to be appointed Propraetor
(Proconsul) California.

SAS : Uti Rogas.
FAC : Antiquo.
MAM : Uti Rogas.
MBA : Uti Rogas.
CCS : Antiquo.
ECF : Antiquo.
LECA: Uti Rogas.
CFBM: Antiquo.
CFBQ: Antiquo.
QFM : Uti Rogas.
CFD : Uti Rogas.
TGP : Uti Rogas.
MIP : Antiquo.
DIPI: Uti Rogas.
TLF : Uti Rogas.
MMA : Uti Rogas.
LMS : Abstineo.
PMS : Antiquo.
AMA : Abstineo.
MOG : Uti Rogas.
TOPA: Antiquo.
GPL : Uti Rogas.
GSA : Antiquo.
JSM : Antiquo.
LSA : Uti Rogas.
QSP : Uti Rogas.
ATMC: Uti Rogas.
FVG : Uti Rogas.

Candidate Q. Fabius Maximus received 16 Uti Rogas, 10 Antiquo and 2
abstentions.

Congratulations Q. Fabius Maximus, appointed by the Senatus
Proconsul of Provincia California.


Comments from Senatores:
TOPA: I request the Consuls approach the tax-paying citizens of
California and ask one of them to candidate for the position. The
problems mentioned in the census and by several senators demonstrate
quite clearly that new leadership is needed in this provincia.
MOG : Frankly, I'm tired of all the blather about him having made a
"threat". It was clearly a joke, and hopefully by this vote of
confidence we can put this matter to rest.
FAC : I think that California needs a new governor able to raise new
citizens and make active the Provincia. The only activity which could
be organized is a collaboration with Getty Museum which is involved in
one of the biggest archeological swindle because accused to traffic
illegal rests stolen in Italy.
TGP : There seems to me to be a large amount of truth in what our
Pater Patriae Flavius Vedius Germanicus has said on the subject of
Quintus Fabius service as governor of California. The Senate should
give serious thought to setting goals in terms of taxpayers and
additional citizens as well as face to face meetings for each
province. Some thought should also be given to reducing the size of
some of our provinces.
CCS : California needs an active propraetor.
MMA : I asked the Senate for their views on this as I was not sure
how to vote, considering the items mentioned in my post. Apparently
some Senators do not believe that each of us have the right to our
beliefs, and must criticize everything said which disagrees with their
views. However, four Senators replied to my questions and concerns,
and made many good points. Some I had not considered sufficiently
until I read their messages. My thanks to these five Senators as your
comments have helped me greatly in making my decision. I also thank
Senator Octavious for his input although it was not quite so polite.
Senator Maximus has also provided some new material that I was not
aware of. Considering all this material together, I have decided to
continue to support Senator Maximus in his request to take up once
more his Proconsulship in California, based on the replies to my
question, and to the sensibility and service that all of the above
have demonstrated. Most of the problems that Senator Maximus has in
his Province, I find are significant in my province as well, and the
size problems of the provinces of California and Nova Britannia are
very similar.
GSA : I was planning to abstain on this item, considering that any
governor, no matter how bad, is better than no governor at all, and
offering Q.Fabius Maximus the opportunity to improve the situation in
California. However, instead of describing his future plans for his
provincia, Q.Fabius Maximus has spent the contio trying to excuse his
lack of past activity in terms that do not allow me to foresee any
future improvement. Besides, his excuses are not convincing enough to
me; I live in a province (Hispania) which is comparable in extension
(194,897 sq mi) and population (44 million inhabitants) to California,
and mine is a very active and lively province thanks to the good work
of successive provincial governments over the years. Therefore, I vote
*against* Q. Fabius Maximus being reinstated as governor for another
bare, fruitless year. Maybe the void will encourage other California
citizens to present themselves for the office, and we might one day
have the propraetor that California deserves.
AMA : I have not met Senator Fabius, nor do I feel that I have
followed the debate enough to express an opinion on this matter.
GFBM: I had originally intended to vote Uti Rogas for Senator
Maximus. However, the way he responded to Caeso Fabius Buteo
Quintilianus gives me reason to question his intentions, and ability
to function as Proconsul. I'm not sure I believe all of the rhetoric
against Maximus, but I do know that his response to Quintilianus was
unnecessary as it was worded.
ATMC: Although Senator Fabius is, a overly rough in his dealing with
people at times, asnd there were threats etc., and even got me a bit
angry with him once long ago, I hold no grudge, and respect his great
knowledge, and contributions to Nova Roma over the years. I would like
to believe, that he perhaps has learned something from our friendly
criticism, and that he can perhaps try to change his approach when
dealing with those that he strongly disagrees with. All of us are
human and have our failings. The thing to always work on is to improve
ourselves in our relationships with others. I am willing to support
Senator Fabius this time, to give him the opportunity to demonstrate
that he is the right person. Yes, there are those here who will say
that I am making a mistake, and perhaps you are right, but I am
willing to give him another chance.
JSM : For an individual to be successful in the office of propraetor
of any provincia requires strong people skills -- motivating and
encouraging citizen involvement and recognising superior
contributions. Those who have met Fabius Maximus may see another side
of him. I, however, must base my decision on years of reading his
postings to this and other lists, and I find Fabius Maximus unsuited
to lead a provincia, based on my observations.
DIPI: Fabius is often berated for his behavior but his critics in
this issue have often been far worse than he in the manner of their
criticism. Fabius has done nothing but behave honorably in the matter
of his proconsulship.
QFM : Im voting for myself because if I abstain its the same as a no
vote.
LSA : What sense is there in turning down Quintus Fabius' request to
continue and instead go to citizens who have expressed no interest in
the post and asking them to take it?



ITEM II:
Propraetrix et Senatrix Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia has requested
that she receive payment for 50% of her province's tax remittance from
2005 and 2006, less transfer costs, based on accounts receivable
spreadsheets, managed by Quaestors. This shall be granted as per
prevailing law and payment forwarded to her by Patricia Cassia on
behalf of this august body.

SAS : Uti Rogas.
FAC : Uti Rogas.
MAM : Uti Rogas.
MBA : Uti Rogas.
CCS : Uti Rogas.
ECF : Uti Rogas.
LECA: Antiquo.
CFBM: Uti Rogas.
CFBQ: Uti Rogas.
QFM : Antiquo.
CFD : Antiquo.
TGP : Uti Rogas.
MIP : Uti Rogas.
DIPI: Abstineo.
TLF : Uti Rogas.
MMA : Uti Rogas.
LMS : Uti Rogas.
PMS : Uti Rogas.
AMA : Uti Rogas.
MOG : Uti Rogas.
TOPA: Uti Rogas.
GPL : Uti Rogas.
GSA : Antiquo.
JSM : Uti Rogas.
LSA : Antiquo.
QSP : Uti Rogas.
ATMC: Uti Rogas.
FVG : Antiquo.

The proposal of Item II received 21 Uti Rogas, 6 Antiquo and 1
abstention, and the item passes.


Comments from Senatores:
CFBQ: I fully trust Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia to use these funds
for the best of the Res Publica and her provincia.
PMS : I am pleased to vote to extend this funding to Arnamentia
Moravia Aurelia, citizen since 2002 who has proven herself to be an
attentive, outstanding Propraetrix et al. Her agenda of plans for the
provincia looks exciting and will benefit the republic as a whole.
Her province's tax money is in good hands with her. She is requesting
funding for the time she has been Propraetrix only. Our budget has an
annual amount dedicated to provincia tax portions. This is one of
these times the money is being requisitioned. The last instance I can
see was Hispania in 2002, and they received the funding as requested.
FVG : While I do not have any objection to the proper application of
our law regarding taxes, it is my understanding that we have yet to
receive the promised "figures and letter of explanation of the
Propraetrix". I certainly have nothing to that effect in my email
inbox. On that basis alone I must say no.
GSA : I do not want this vote to be seen as a vote against
Arnamentia Moravia's performance as propraetrix; I am quite happy with
her. Rather, it is a vote against the possibility that the budget of a
previous year be modified after that year is over. I explicitly would
like to invite Propraetrix Arnamentia Moravia to present a plan and a
budget for the activities she plans to fund with that money this year,
and I will be more than happy to vote in favour of that very same
amount of money - or even more, if necessary. But, in principle, we
can not allow for this kind of bad accountancy practices. Last year's
exercise has been closed, and that should be the end of it. Hispania
did request a refunding four years ago, but we did not request
refunding from previous years - only for the period of that very same
year. That makes a lot of difference.
JSM : I know my colleague personally and, based on her performance
as my legata, as well as my firm conviction that activities such as
those she has outlined are essential to strengthen the bonds between
civis and Nova Roma, I am glad to

support her proposals.
QFM : I understand that 50% of revenue was to returned to the
provinces if requested. I assumed that meant that it would be for a
significant event or happening. Senator Moravia does not make a
compelling argument of HOW these monies were to be used for the event.
General expenses should be budgeted by the administration, for re
imbursement, or raised separately from the citizenry and various fund
raisers.



ITEM III:
Propraetor et Senator Caius Curius Saturninus requests that the 5%
from his calendar sales payable to Nova Roma be applied to the Magna
Mater Fund. These calendars were approved of the Senate in January of
this year and are advertised on www.novaroma.org This financial
reconcilliation will be made prior to the final budget presentation on
or about Dec. 15, 2959 AUC

SAS : Uti Rogas.
FAC : Uti Rogas.
MAM : Antiquo.
MBA : Uti Rogas.
CCS : Uti Rogas.
ECF : Uti Rogas.
LECA: Antiquo.
CFBM: Antiquo.
CFBQ: Uti Rogas.
QFM : Antiquo.
CFD : Antiquo.
TGP : Antiquo.
MIP : Uti Rogas.
DIPI: Antiquo.
TLF : Uti Rogas.
MMA : Antiquo.
LMS : Uti Rogas.
PMS : Uti Rogas.
AMA : Uti Rogas.
MOG : "mu", interpreted as "no voting".
TOPA: Uti Rogas.
GPL : Antiquo.
GSA : Antiquo.
JSM : Antiquo.
LSA : Uti Rogas.
QSP : Uti Rogas.
ATMC: Uti Rogas.
FVG : Antiquo.

The proposal of Item III received 15 Uti Rogas, 12 Antiquo, 1
senator refused to vote, and the item passes.


Comments from Senatores:
CFBQ: I don't think any Senator who contribute shall have the right
to decide where the money should go, but on the other hand I would
listen to a suggestion from anybody and this suggestion is a good one.
Here we have chance to strengthen the only ongoing Nova Roma project
and I for one will take that chance. Still I must once more encourage
the Consuls to set one (we need to be careful when taking on such
responsibilities so that we will be able to meet our own promises)
more project. I have mentioned Vindolanda (on the Hadrian wall) in
Britannia before in different forums. As this year's European
Conventus is located on this very wall it becomes an excellent target
for our support if it is at all possible, something that our excellent
Propraetor of Britannia is well placed to find out.
MOG : My preference would be to abstain from voting on matters in
which I have no particular knowledge or interest; and allocation of
funds is generally one of those. Unfortunately, there is no such thing
as an abstain vote under the Senate procedures of the past few years;
no way to declare oneself neutral. This should have been fixed a long
time ago. Thus I vote: Mu.
FAC : The Magna Mater Project, our most important project, needs
more funds to move to a more advances level.
QSP : A very worthwhile project that helps give NR good credibility.
TGP : It will take years for Caius Curius Saturninus to recover his
investment and I would like the Senate to rebate the 5% to Caius
Curius Saturninus so this happens sooner.
CCS : Magna Mater project needs much more contributions than
donations have given this far. With this request I want to encourage
private citizens to make more donations and the whole of Nova Roma to
give more support for the project.
GSA : Although I would personally like to thank my excellent friend
and colleague C. Curius Saturninus for his generosity, I think, again,
that it is bad practice for donors to dictate to the Senate the terms
in which their donations should be spent. That is the prerogative of
the Senate, according to the needs of Nova Roma, and no one else's.
Otherwise, Saturninus could directly donate to the Magna Mater fund
through the channels provided for such donations, without needing
permission from the Senate.
AMA : A worthy project.
GFBM: I am very supportive of the Magna Mater project, so I do not
want my vote to be seen as a means to undermine this excellent
project. The reason for my vote is because the Magna Mater project
has a few individuals who have donated considerable donations to the
project in the past few months. I also know of some pending
fundraisers by the Aediles to boost the Magna Mater fund. The Nova
Roma treasury needs its own source of income, and allowing Equestrians
to dictate were their percentage donations are going to go could lead
to long term problems. I would rather the fund be sent to the Nova
Roma treasury. If at any time the Magna Mater Project is in need of
funds they can always request funds from the treasury .
JSM : I do not believe that this sets a good budgetary precedent.
The calendar is an outstanding project, as is Magna Mater. But we are
responsible for the overall financial health of Nova Roma, and the
decline in our tax revenues is a cause for long-term concern.
DIPI: I agree with Astur that it would be a bad precedent for
donations be directed to specific funds without prior approval of the
senate. As noted, he certaiinly can direct an additional 5 percent to
the Magna Mater fund.
QFM : I believe that if the Senate wants to give money to MM fund,
it will come out of the general fund. I admire Curius zeal to the
Great Mother, but this just sets a dangerous precedent of separating
funds within the general fund.



Valete
Marcus Arminius Maior
Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44088 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: Nova Roma and Religio Romana.....Prayer....
M. Hortensia M. Silvano spd;
the Religio is controlled by Nova Roma as it is the
official state religion, this is why an independent website is
impossible. I suggest you visit the Religio Romana group as well as
the NR website to get a good understanding of the religio romana and
the Roman state.
bene vale
M. Hortensia Maior
> Salvete!
> I read the threads on here about Nova Roma and freedom of
> Religion,which is great but couldnt NR or someone that is of a
> priestly class create a Website just for Religio Roma,that is
> affiliated with NR but not controlled by NR?
>
> I also need some prayers dedicated to Apollo,the Lares and other
> household gods..Im not good at creating prayers and any help would
be
> appreciated..
>
> Vale!
> M.Silvanvs
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44089 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: Report of Senate session
SALVETE !

Thank you Senators.
"Many small stones together exist and create great temples".

VALETE,
IVL SABINVS
MM Project Coordinator.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Marcus Arminius Maior"
<marminius@...> wrote:
> ITEM III:
> Propraetor et Senator Caius Curius Saturninus requests that the
5% from his calendar sales payable to Nova Roma be applied to the
Magna Mater Fund. These calendars were approved of the Senate in
January of this year and are advertised on www.novaroma.org This
financial reconcilliation will be made prior to the final budget
presentation on or about Dec. 15, 2959 AUC
>
> SAS : Uti Rogas.
> FAC : Uti Rogas.
> MAM : Antiquo.
> MBA : Uti Rogas.
> CCS : Uti Rogas.
> ECF : Uti Rogas.
> LECA: Antiquo.
> CFBM: Antiquo.
> CFBQ: Uti Rogas.
> QFM : Antiquo.
> CFD : Antiquo.
> TGP : Antiquo.
> MIP : Uti Rogas.
> DIPI: Antiquo.
> TLF : Uti Rogas.
> MMA : Antiquo.
> LMS : Uti Rogas.
> PMS : Uti Rogas.
> AMA : Uti Rogas.
> MOG : "mu", interpreted as "no voting".
> TOPA: Uti Rogas.
> GPL : Antiquo.
> GSA : Antiquo.
> JSM : Antiquo.
> LSA : Uti Rogas.
> QSP : Uti Rogas.
> ATMC: Uti Rogas.
> FVG : Antiquo.
>
> The proposal of Item III received 15 Uti Rogas, 12 Antiquo, 1
> senator refused to vote, and the item passes.
>
>
> Comments from Senatores:
> CFBQ: I don't think any Senator who contribute shall have the
right to decide where the money should go, but on the other hand I
would listen to a suggestion from anybody and this suggestion is a
good one. Here we have chance to strengthen the only ongoing Nova
Roma project and I for one will take that chance. Still I must once
more encourage
> the Consuls to set one (we need to be careful when taking on such
> responsibilities so that we will be able to meet our own promises)
> more project. I have mentioned Vindolanda (on the Hadrian wall) in
> Britannia before in different forums. As this year's European
> Conventus is located on this very wall it becomes an excellent
target for our support if it is at all possible, something that our
excellent Propraetor of Britannia is well placed to find out.
> MOG : My preference would be to abstain from voting on matters in
> which I have no particular knowledge or interest; and allocation of
> funds is generally one of those. Unfortunately, there is no such
thing as an abstain vote under the Senate procedures of the past few
years;
> no way to declare oneself neutral. This should have been fixed a
long time ago. Thus I vote: Mu.
> FAC : The Magna Mater Project, our most important project, needs
> more funds to move to a more advances level.
> QSP : A very worthwhile project that helps give NR good
credibility.
> TGP : It will take years for Caius Curius Saturninus to recover
his
> investment and I would like the Senate to rebate the 5% to Caius
> Curius Saturninus so this happens sooner.
> CCS : Magna Mater project needs much more contributions than
> donations have given this far. With this request I want to
encourage
> private citizens to make more donations and the whole of Nova Roma
to give more support for the project.
> GSA : Although I would personally like to thank my excellent friend
> and colleague C. Curius Saturninus for his generosity, I think,
again,
> that it is bad practice for donors to dictate to the Senate the
terms
> in which their donations should be spent. That is the prerogative
of
> the Senate, according to the needs of Nova Roma, and no one else's.
> Otherwise, Saturninus could directly donate to the Magna Mater fund
> through the channels provided for such donations, without needing
> permission from the Senate.
> AMA : A worthy project.
> GFBM: I am very supportive of the Magna Mater project, so I do
not
> want my vote to be seen as a means to undermine this excellent
> project. The reason for my vote is because the Magna Mater project
> has a few individuals who have donated considerable donations to
the
> project in the past few months. I also know of some pending
> fundraisers by the Aediles to boost the Magna Mater fund. The Nova
> Roma treasury needs its own source of income, and allowing
Equestrians
> to dictate were their percentage donations are going to go could
lead
> to long term problems. I would rather the fund be sent to the Nova
> Roma treasury. If at any time the Magna Mater Project is in need
of
> funds they can always request funds from the treasury .
> JSM : I do not believe that this sets a good budgetary precedent.
> The calendar is an outstanding project, as is Magna Mater. But we
are
> responsible for the overall financial health of Nova Roma, and the
> decline in our tax revenues is a cause for long-term concern.
> DIPI: I agree with Astur that it would be a bad precedent for
> donations be directed to specific funds without prior approval of
the
> senate. As noted, he certaiinly can direct an additional 5 percent
to
> the Magna Mater fund.
> QFM : I believe that if the Senate wants to give money to MM
fund,
> it will come out of the general fund. I admire Curius zeal to the
> Great Mother, but this just sets a dangerous precedent of
separating
> funds within the general fund.
>
>
>
> Valete
> Marcus Arminius Maior
> Tribunus Plebis
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44090 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
> A. Tullia Scholastica Silvano quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae
> voluntatis S.P.D.
>
> Salve!
> Thanks for the translations A. Tullia Scholastica..
>
> ATS: Nihil est!
>
>
> Pax et Vale!
>
> Et tibi, et vobis omnibus!
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
> <fororom@...> wrote:
>> >
>>> > > Salve, et salvete!
>>> > >
>>> > > Im looking for a good online Translator..Ive looked in the Links
>>> > > section but the one that is listed there doesnt really work,and
> none
>>> > > of the ones I've found work well either...I was trying to figure
> what
>>> > > the Latin for "Hope,Faith,Charity" and "Faith,Family,Friends"
> were and
>>> > > some other things.
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: Faith, Hope, and Charity: Fides, Spes, et Caritas;
> Faith, Family,
>>> > > and Friends: Fides, Familia, et Amici.
>>> > >
>>> > > Pax!
>>> > >
>>> > > Et tecum vobiscumque!
>>> > >
>>> > > Vale, et valete,
>>> > >
>>> > > A. Tullia Scholastica
>>> > > Classicist
>>> > > Interpres Linguae Latinae
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>> >
>
>
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44091 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-03
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
> Salve, Agricola, et salvete, omnes!
>
> Salvete Omnes!
>
> Now the truth is known: A. Tullia Scholastica is the internet's most
> reliable on-line translator of English to Latin!
>
> ATS: Well, if we could get Avitus to perform such duties, the results
> would be better, at least when complicated items have to be dealt with...but
> this was easy enough. Now, a certain 26 page project on textbook translation
> is another matter entirely, but that is translation rather than composition
> (translating the native language into Latin).
>
> The NR Wiki has a page of sources for Latin study. The page is a work
> in progress but it can be found here:
> http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/Reading_list_for_lingua_Latina
>
> Some of the dictionaries are quite inexpensive. The Bantam or the
> Collins Gem next to the computer would be found handy by many, I believe.
>
> ATS: Believe it or not, the Collins Gem is recommended by Avitus, who
> says that there is nothing between it and the Oxford Latin Dictionary, the
> latter at a mere $350 or so. Now, I need that itty-bitty pocket OLD, about
> 12.5 x 9 x 3 inches, but the chances are that most people don¹t. Amsco also
> had a paperback dictionary by Traupman, and Cassell¹s (which gives some
> examples and information on usage) is also available, possibly even in
> paperback, though personally I don¹t recommend reference works in paperback
> unless there is no choice. Either of these is fine for ordinary use by those
> who know some Latin, but don¹t have to translate a lot of it. I believe that
> the Amsco one is now published by some other company. The Collins Gem is also
> decent, and has information on Latin grammar as well, plus that on the
> calendar, numbers, familial relationships, and some geographical and personal
> names...all in a pocket dictionary.
>
> Optime valete!
>
> Agricola
>
> Et tu, et vos omnes bonae voluntatis!
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
> <fororom@...> wrote:
>> >
>>> > > Salve, et salvete!
>>> > >
>>> > > Im looking for a good online Translator..Ive looked in the Links
>>> > > section but the one that is listed there doesnt really work,and none
>>> > > of the ones I've found work well either...I was trying to figure what
>>> > > the Latin for "Hope,Faith,Charity" and "Faith,Family,Friends" were and
>>> > > some other things.
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: Faith, Hope, and Charity: Fides, Spes, et Caritas;
> Faith, Family,
>>> > > and Friends: Fides, Familia, et Amici.
>>> > >
>>> > > Pax!
>>> > >
>>> > > Et tecum vobiscumque!
>>> > >
>>> > > Vale, et valete,
>>> > >
>>> > > A. Tullia Scholastica
>>> > > Classicist
>>> > > Interpres Linguae Latinae
>>> > >
>>> > >
>
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44092 From: Steve Mesnick Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
lvlarcvs_silvanvs wrote:
> I'm looking for a good online Translator....

Well, it's not a translator (in the sense of,
say, Babelfish), but I find "Words", the Latin
pop-up dictionary program, to be invaluable. It's
very powerful and extensive; gives you very helpful
grammatical analysis. You can input a word in any inflection
and it'll parse it for you. And it includes rare, medieval,
and ecclesiastical words.

http://www.erols.com/whitaker/words.htm

A. Tullius Severus

...who, as it happens, has never met
and is not [in the real world] related
to A. Tullia Scholsatica %^)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44093 From: Diana (Pagan Federation International) Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: Report of Senate session
Thank you for the Senate report Tribune Arminius! It was a good read!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44094 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
> A. Tullia Scholastica A. Tullio Severo quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae
> voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
> lvlarcvs_silvanvs wrote:
>> > I'm looking for a good online Translator....
>
> Well, it's not a translator (in the sense of,
> say, Babelfish), but I find "Words", the Latin
> pop-up dictionary program, to be invaluable. It's
> very powerful and extensive; gives you very helpful
> grammatical analysis. You can input a word in any inflection
> and it'll parse it for you. And it includes rare, medieval,
> and ecclesiastical words.
>
> http://www.erols.com/whitaker/words.htm
>
> A. Tullius Severus
>
> ...who, as it happens, has never met
> and is not [in the real world] related
> to A. Tullia Scholsatica %^)
>
> Tullia: Scholastica...not sure of the meaning of that emotikon thingie...
>
> We are, however, in the same academic field, most of whose members, along with
> many others, are in the sodalitas Latinitatis. I know of at least three
> Tullii who are classicists or classics students, so perhaps our gens will one
> day become known as the home of classicists. Makes sense, doesn¹t it? You
> would be related to me in Nova Roma if you cognomen were Scholasticus, but
> having the male version of the same praenomen doesn¹t carry that implication.
> You just got the same initials I did, plus the same praenomen and nomen in a
> different gender. In any case, my name was slightly different when I arrived
> here, but under the influence of certain nomenclature specialists, including
> our senior, world-class Latinist, I changed it to something more authentic.
> My original name was perfect Latin, but not quite according to the rules in
> effect at present. Even so, I was ATS first...
>
> If you are remotely interested in meeting me, I usually attend two or
> three reenactment events in the eastern U.S. every year, but will be going
> farther afield this year, D.V. , and must conserve for that. One of the other
> classicists is also a reenactor (midwest, I believe). Despite the lack of
> them in my area, some classicists actually do participate in reenactment, and
> a fair number are citizens of NR.
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44095 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Oath of Office of Flavius Galerius Aurelianus
I, Flavius Galerius Aurelianus also know as Patrick Dennis Owen, do
hereby solemnly swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act
always in the best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova
Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Flavius Galerius Aurelianus, swear to
honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to
pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Flavius Galerius Aurelianus, swear to uphold and defend the Religio
Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in
a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Flavius Galerius Aurelianus, swear to protect and defend the
Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Flavius Galerius Aurelianus, further swear to fulfill the
obligations and responsibilities of the office of Propraetor America
Austrorientalis to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of
Iuppiter Omnia Maximus, Ceres Mater, Apollo, Dea Minerva, Vesta Mater
and the Dii Immortales of the Roman people and by their will and
favor, do I accept the position of Propraetor America Austrorientalis
and all the rights, privileges, obligations, and responsibilities
attendant thereto.

**********************************************************************

PRIMARY CONTACTS:
patrick.owen@... (daytime-week days)
padruigtheuncle@...
brotherpaganus@...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44096 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Congratulations to Tb. Galerius Paulinus
F. Galerius Aurelianus to his cousin Tb. Galerius Paulinus. Salve.

Congratulations on your appointment as Propraetor Mediatlantica. We
should plan an interprovincial gathering soon. Be well and may Dii
Immortales grant you all that is just, appropriate, and auspicious.

Vadite in pace Cereris.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44097 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: Congratulations to Tb. Galerius Paulinus
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

Seems like a good day for Gens Galeria!

Congratulations to you both.

Valete:

Modianus

On 6/4/06, Patrick D. Owen <Patrick.Owen@...> wrote:
>
> F. Galerius Aurelianus to his cousin Tb. Galerius Paulinus. Salve.
>
> Congratulations on your appointment as Propraetor Mediatlantica. We
> should plan an interprovincial gathering soon. Be well and may Dii
> Immortales grant you all that is just, appropriate, and auspicious.
>
> Vadite in pace Cereris.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44098 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: A THREAT?
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

There are several reasons why the Senate and the majority of our magistrates
are concerned about Appius Claudius Priscus. This is being addressed in the
senate.

One reason is his link to a Neo-Nazi organization and involvement in racist
propoganda, all of which is well documented and not denied by Priscus.

Another reason is his contacting the government of the United States to
promote a scheme that would, as he advocates, give Nova Roma a geographical
boundary in modern day Iraq. Priscus is not authorized by the senate to
contact any macronational government on behalf of Nova Roma or Nova Roma
Inc.

His status as a known racist, and as a Nazi (in the very least affiliated
with them), AND ESPECIALLY the fact that he has contacted the US government
about his plan to establish a Nova Roma state on Iraqi land has raised the
attention of the Senate of Nova Roma. This is the reason why he is
considered a threat to Nova Roma.

We are not dealing with some kid with strange ideas. We are dealing with a
highly educated individual well adept in propoganda. It is my belief, and
the belief of several other magistrates and senators that this man is a
threat to the well being of Nova Roma.

As I mentioned before, the matter is being addressed by the Senate.

Valete:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Consul

On 6/3/06, M�IVL�SEVERVS <marcusiuliusseverus@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I think that those of us who have been following the still unclear
> references to Appius Claudius Priscus and his being "a threat to our well
> being", would like to know why Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Consul and some
> other authorities in Nova Roma have arrived to that judgement.
>
> Valete optime,
>
> M�IVL�SEVERVS
>
> PROPR�TOR�PROVINCI��MEXICO
> ROGATOR
> INTERPRETER
> SCRIBA�CENSORIS�GEM
> MVS�VS�COLLEGII�ERATOVS�SODALITATIS�MVSARVM
> SOCIVS�CHORI�MVSARVM
>
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
> This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.
>
> Powered by Outblaze
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44099 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Oath of Office of Tiberius Galerius Paulinus as Praetor of Mediatla
Oath of Office of Tiberius Galerius Paulinus as Praetor of Mediatlantica Provincia

I, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus ( Timothy Paul Gallagher) do hereby solemnly swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus swear to protect and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus further swear to fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of Praetor of Mediatlantica Provincia to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept the position of Praetor of Mediatlantica Provincia and all the rights, privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.

Done on Dies PRID. NON IVN. MMDCCLIX A. V. C. in the Consulship of G. Fabius Buteo Modianus and Pompeia Minucia Strabo
(4th day of June 2759 )










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44100 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: Congratulations to Tb. Galerius Paulinus
Salve Praetor F. Galerius Aurelianus

Congratulations on your appointment as Praetor as well.
All the best and yes a joint event soon.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetor of Mediatlantica

----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick D. Owen<mailto:Patrick.Owen@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 3:16 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Congratulations to Tb. Galerius Paulinus


F. Galerius Aurelianus to his cousin Tb. Galerius Paulinus. Salve.

Congratulations on your appointment as Propraetor Mediatlantica. We
should plan an interprovincial gathering soon. Be well and may Dii
Immortales grant you all that is just, appropriate, and auspicious.

Vadite in pace Cereris.





SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Citizenship+test&w3=Nova&w4=Us+citizenship+test&w5=Citizenship+test+questions&c=5&s=110&.sig=gi3M6rPIJDHzNmuX7X3JBQ> Citizenship test<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Citizenship+test&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Citizenship+test&w3=Nova&w4=Us+citizenship+test&w5=Citizenship+test+questions&c=5&s=110&.sig=8aXDd_kXfq9MRI4EtYMLtg> Nova<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Nova&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Citizenship+test&w3=Nova&w4=Us+citizenship+test&w5=Citizenship+test+questions&c=5&s=110&.sig=SXN0tDQ1L0CkY4njGt1WNA>
Us citizenship test<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Us+citizenship+test&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Citizenship+test&w3=Nova&w4=Us+citizenship+test&w5=Citizenship+test+questions&c=5&s=110&.sig=aAQhDwznWDBiUsSk4aqpqA> Citizenship test questions<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Citizenship+test+questions&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Citizenship+test&w3=Nova&w4=Us+citizenship+test&w5=Citizenship+test+questions&c=5&s=110&.sig=ivi3xvPX-VD2PakGAc-6WA>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44101 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: Congratulations to Tb. Galerius Paulinus
Salve Consul Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

Thank you and thank you for your vote in the Senate.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: David Kling (Modianus)<mailto:tau.athanasios@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 5:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Congratulations to Tb. Galerius Paulinus


Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

Seems like a good day for Gens Galeria!

Congratulations to you both.

Valete:

Modianus

On 6/4/06, Patrick D. Owen <Patrick.Owen@...<mailto:Patrick.Owen@...>> wrote:
>
> F. Galerius Aurelianus to his cousin Tb. Galerius Paulinus. Salve.
>
> Congratulations on your appointment as Propraetor Mediatlantica. We
> should plan an interprovincial gathering soon. Be well and may Dii
> Immortales grant you all that is just, appropriate, and auspicious.
>
> Vadite in pace Cereris.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Citizenship+test&w3=Nova&w4=Us+citizenship+test&w5=Citizenship+test+questions&c=5&s=110&.sig=gi3M6rPIJDHzNmuX7X3JBQ> Citizenship test<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Citizenship+test&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Citizenship+test&w3=Nova&w4=Us+citizenship+test&w5=Citizenship+test+questions&c=5&s=110&.sig=8aXDd_kXfq9MRI4EtYMLtg> Nova<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Nova&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Citizenship+test&w3=Nova&w4=Us+citizenship+test&w5=Citizenship+test+questions&c=5&s=110&.sig=SXN0tDQ1L0CkY4njGt1WNA>
Us citizenship test<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Us+citizenship+test&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Citizenship+test&w3=Nova&w4=Us+citizenship+test&w5=Citizenship+test+questions&c=5&s=110&.sig=aAQhDwznWDBiUsSk4aqpqA> Citizenship test questions<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Citizenship+test+questions&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Citizenship+test&w3=Nova&w4=Us+citizenship+test&w5=Citizenship+test+questions&c=5&s=110&.sig=ivi3xvPX-VD2PakGAc-6WA>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44102 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Congratulations to Gens Galeria!!
<Seems like a good day for Gens Galeria!
It sure is!!

A huge congratulalations to two of Nova Roma's finest: F. Galerius Aurelianus and Tiberius Galerius
Paulinus. The best of luck to you both in your new offices!

Vale,
Diana Octavia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44103 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR JUNE 04, 2006
CONVENING OF THE SENATE – June 4, 2006 (2759)

The Senate is called to order June 4, 2006 (2759) by
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, Consul, Pontifex, Augur
The auspices being favorable the Senate is hereby called into
session to consider the following matter:

APPIUS CLAUDIUS PRISCUS.The order shall commence as follows:

Intention period from the time of this message to last 24 hours, and
at this time the tribunes can issue intercession if they feel it
necessary.

On June 4th [10:35 AM EST/4:35 PM Roman Time] the Contio period
shall commence and shall last for 96 hours (4 days) until June 8th
[10:35 AM EST/4:35 PM Roman Time].

On June 8th [10:35 AM EST/4:35 PM Roman Time] voting shall commence
and shall last 48 hours (2 days) and shall end on June 10th [10:35
AM EST/4:35 PM Roman Time].

This senate session will Address one issue only: Appius Claudius
Priscus.

Senatus Consultum Ultimum

The Senate of Nova Roma issues a Senatus Consultum Ultimum, and
invests in the Consuls of Nova Roma the authority to temporarily
suspend the Constitution of Nova Roma in order to expel citizen
Appius Claudius Priscus from citizenship (ie., membership) within
Nova Roma. This Senatus Consultum Ultimum grants this authority to
the Consuls only to address the status of citizen Appius Claudius
Priscus and for no other purpose. The Senate authorizes the Consuls
to expel Appius Claudius Priscus from Nova Roma and authorizes no
other action against Appius Claudius Priscus. Once this action
occurs the authority invested in the Consuls shall cease.


Respectfully,

QVINTVS SVETOVIUS PAVLINVS

TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44104 From: l_fidelius_graecus Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: Remembering Byzantium: a few facts
Salve.

I would recommend people to be more mindful of the present, such as
in noting the source of the text to which you link:

"Source.

John Chrysostom: Eight Homilies Against the Jews [Adversus Judeaus],
Patrologia Greaca, Vol 98

This translation, here cleaned up for typos, etc, was on an anti-
Semitic website [as a justification for current anti-Semitism]. So
far I have been unable to track down the translator."

Ever since Paul Halsall's arrest for cocaine distribution and
subsequent suspension, (see
http://ancienthistory.about.com/b/a/189958.htm )the material at that
website has been changed noticably to support modern agendas largely
unknown in the ancient world.

Vale,

L. Fidelius Graecus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "David Kling (Modianus)"
<tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete:
>
> Here is an interesting link about John Chrysostom:
>
> http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/chrysostom-jews6.html
>
> I think it is good that people read this material and be mindful of
the
> past.
>
> Valete;
>
> Modianus
>
>
> On 5/29/06, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:
> >
> > M. Hortensia A. Sempronio Regulo;
> > I appreciate your informative post & I did not know
> > this about Byzantium, at the same time this was the depressing
start
> > of Official State Christianity's battle against the Jews and
Pagans.
> > Just read St. John Chrysostom if you wish to be depressed.
> > bene vale in pacem deorum
> > Marca Hortensia Maior
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44105 From: Steve Mesnick Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
I wrote:
>> A. Tullius Severus
>>
>> ...who, as it happens, has never met
>> and is not [in the real world] related
>> to A. Tullia Scholastica %^)

To which Scholastica graciously replied, in part:
>>
>> not sure of the meaning of that emotikon thingie...

Tilt your head to the left...it's a grin.

>> We are, however, in the same academic field

Actually, I'm flattered, but that's not the case. I'm
a pharmacist in Rhode Island, and a (primarily medieval)
re-enactor who counts among his hobbies the translating
of Latin texts (mostly medieval ceremonials, manorial court records,
and the odd Elizabethan board-game treatise).

>> most of whose members, along with
>> many others, are in the sodalitas Latinitatis.

Which I have to get around to joining....

Thanks again for your reply.

A. Tullius Severus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44106 From: flavius leviticus Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: Oath of Office of Tiberius Galerius Paulinus as Praetor of Medi
Ave Cousin Tiberius Galerius Paulinus,A hearty congradulations to you on your recent appointment.Our Dear Mater I am sure is very proud of you as is the rest of our Gens.May the Gods and Goddesses of Rome protect you and guide you in your new undertaking.I know you shall serve all the citizens of our great Nation to the ultimate benefit of all.Vale,Appius Galerius Aurelianus.Semper Fidelis!

Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote: Oath of Office of Tiberius Galerius Paulinus as Praetor of Mediatlantica Provincia

I, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus ( Timothy Paul Gallagher) do hereby solemnly swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus swear to protect and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus further swear to fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of Praetor of Mediatlantica Provincia to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept the position of Praetor of Mediatlantica Provincia and all the rights, privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.

Done on Dies PRID. NON IVN. MMDCCLIX A. V. C. in the Consulship of G. Fabius Buteo Modianus and Pompeia Minucia Strabo
(4th day of June 2759 )










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history Citizenship test Nova Us citizenship test Citizenship test questions

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44107 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: Report of Senate session
C. Equitius Cato Ti. Galerio Paulino sal.

Salve praetor!

And may I offer you my heartiest congratulations on your appointment
as Governor! Woot!

Vale optime,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44108 From: appiusclaudiuspriscus Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE [to exile Appius Claudius Priscus]
Salvete omnes!

"Capital proceedings are those where the penalty is death or exile,..."

- The Digest of Justinian, T. Mommsen et al, ed, Book 48, 1:2.

"If a charge is to be brought against anyone, the charge must first be
signed."

- Digest, Bk. 48, 2:7

Consul Modianus has said that I am a "danger" because I have not
denied to him that I (am?/was?/know?) something called a "neo-Nazi".
Let him, or anyone, accuse me of something that is a capital crime,
and sign it. Let there be a trial with a judge, a jury, and a defense
lawyer like Cicero.

Mommsen's History of Rome says loss of citizenship included exile;
loss of citizenship without exile was impossible. The bill before the
Senate even calls it expulsion. So, it is exile, and this is a
capital proceeding.

The greatest danger to Rome, is not the opinions of Appius Claudius
Priscus, assiduus & plebeian citizen. The greatest danger to Rome, is
that Rome, by repudiating rule of law even once, in a capital
proceeding, will forever disqualify itself from being taken seriously
as a real state.

"To call another man to account for his conduct is to impose upon
ourselves the necessity of integrity, of self-restraint, of all the
virtues, especially if, as I have said, our action is due to no motive
other than the public advantage."

- Cicero, 2nd Speech Against Verres, Bk. 3, I.1, Greenwood translation.

Valete,
Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44109 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: prid. Non. Iun.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est pridie Nonas Iunius; haec dies comitialis est.

"The rest of the Circus is protected by Hercules the Guardian,
The god holds the office due to the Sibylline oracle.
The day before the Nones is when he takes up office:
If you ask about the inscription, Sulla approved the work." - Ovid,
Fasti VI

Today is held in honor of Hercules (known to the Greeks as Herakles).
There are many wonderful stories about Hercules which have nothing to
do with the famous Twelve Labors, among them:

Hesione was the daughter of King Laomedon of Troy. Hercules met
Hesione after his year of enslavement to Omphale, when he set out for
Troy. Hercules found Troy in a state of crisis, as King Laomedon had
cheated Poseidon and Apollo by failing to pay them for building the
walls. For punishment Poseidon had sent a large sea monster, who would
only be appeased by devouring the princess, Hesione. Hercules sought
to kill the monster and naturally expected a reward, such as
Laomedon's amazing horses. Hercules bravely killed the beast by
allowing himself to be swallowed by the monster, whom he then killed
from the inside. But once a cheat always a cheat: Laomedon skimped on
paying Hercules too. So Hercules raised an army, including such great
men as Telamon, father of Ajax. When his army captured the city,
Hercules gave Hesione in marriage to Telamon (they soon gave birth to
another hero, Teucer). Hesione was given the opportunity to save any
one of her fellow Trojan prisoners: she chose her brother Podarces,
later known as Priam.

After completing his twelve labors, Hercules hit the road, once again.
Somehow or another, Hercules caught wind that Eurytus, the prince of
Oechalia, was offering his beautiful daughter, Iole, as a bride prize
to any man who could best him and his sons in an archery contest. Upon
hearing this, Hercules traveled to Oechalia and competed against
Eurytus and his sons. Legend has it that Eurytus was the man who first
schooled Hercules in the use of the bow. His was a challenge that
pitted student against teacher. It should come as no surprise that
Hercules defeated his fellow contestants with ease. When it came
time, however, for Eurytus to hand over Iole to Hercules, as his
bride, Eurytus refused. In this decision he was supported by all of
his sons except Iphytus. One may wonder why a prince would deny the
strongest man in the world his daughter in marriage. For Eurytus, the
reasoning was simple: he would not allow his beloved daughter to marry
(and eventually have children with) a man who had a history of
murdering his sons in a fit of rage (remember that whole Megara
fiasco?), for fear that the same fate would befall his own
grandchildren. Crestfallen and dismayed, Hercules left Oechalia.
Shortly after Hercules' departure, some mares (or cattle, depending on
the storyteller) were stolen by Autolycus from a local man. Eurytus
instantly thought that Hercules was the culprit. Iphytus, however,
refused to believe that Hercules was the thief and set out to pay him
a visit at Tiryns (another version suggests Iphytus went to Tiryns to
look for the cattle himself). Hercules received Iphytus in good cheer
and the two men passed the time entertaining each other. Unfortunately
for Iphytus, however, during the visit something went awry, and
Hercules, in another fit of madness, hurled Iphytus to his death from
the top of the walls of Tiryns. Following the murder of Iphytus,
Hercules contracted a terrible disease, as a result of his violent
outburst. Hercules then journeyed to the oracle at Delphi, in hopes
that the priestess there would advise him on how to cure himself. But
Hercules was to be disappointed. When he questioned the Pythian
priestess, she was unable to answer him in oracles. Hercules, outraged
at priestesses unwillingness to help, began tearing the temple apart.
When Hercules came upon the Delphic tripod, he started to make off
with it, thinking that he would establish an oracle of his own.
Apollo, however, was not about to let Hercules carry off the prized
tripod from his sacred site. He began to wrestle with Hercules over
its possession; Apollo was supported by his sister, Artemis, while
Hercules was supported by his patron, Athena. In the midst of their
tug-of-war contest, Zeus dropped in and tried to break up the feuding
brothers (Apollo and Hercules are, after all, half-brothers by Zeus).
And as parents are often forced to do, Zeus decided that it would be
best to separate the brothers, hurling one of his mighty thunderbolts
between them. After the two siblings were pried apart, Hercules
finally received an oracle, instructing him to be sold into slavery
for a year, and to pay Eurytus in compensation for the loss of his
son. The tripod remained at Delphi and Hermes sold Hercules to
Omphale, Queen of Lydia, for whom he performed women's work for his
year of servitude.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, The Perseus Project (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/copyright.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44110 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: Remembering Byzantium: a few facts
M. Hortensia L. Fidelio spd;
but I hope you are not going to dispute the anti-semitism &
anti-pagan agenda of the Byzantine Empire. Paul Halsall did not
write John Chrysostom's sermons nor pass legislation that was
intolerant of Jews and Pagans.
vale
M. Hortensia Maior

> Ever since Paul Halsall's arrest for cocaine distribution and
> subsequent suspension, (see
> http://ancienthistory.about.com/b/a/189958.htm )the material at
that
> website has been changed noticably to support modern agendas
largely
> unknown in the ancient world.
>
> Vale,
>
> L. Fidelius Graecus
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "David Kling (Modianus)"
> <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete:
> >
> > Here is an interesting link about John Chrysostom:
> >
> > http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/chrysostom-jews6.html
> >
> > I think it is good that people read this material and be mindful
of
> the
> > past.
> >
> > Valete;
> >
> > Modianus
> >
> >
> > On 5/29/06, Maior <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > M. Hortensia A. Sempronio Regulo;
> > > I appreciate your informative post & I did not
know
> > > this about Byzantium, at the same time this was the depressing
> start
> > > of Official State Christianity's battle against the Jews and
> Pagans.
> > > Just read St. John Chrysostom if you wish to be depressed.
> > > bene vale in pacem deorum
> > > Marca Hortensia Maior
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44111 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE [to exile Appius Claudius Priscus]
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Appio Claudio Prisco salutem dicit

You speak as if you consider the label of neo-Nazi a badge of honor. It is
not. It is a disgusting and despicable ideology. As was reported by one of
the Tribunes I have convened the Senate of Nova Roma to issue a Senatus
Consultum Ultimum investing both Consuls with the authority to expel you
from Nova Roma.

If the senate of Nova Roma deems it necessary to collectively reject my
proposed Senatus Consultum Ultimum then I will use other methods, according
to Nova Roma law, to see you expelled from Nova Roma.

I am not going to make our private e-mails public, but since the Praetor
Paulinus has obviously approved your post to our forum then by all means let
the people of Nova Roma know your beliefs on race, women, establishment of a
Nova Roma state (and who will populate said state), etc... Share with the
people how you have attempted to speak on behalf of Nova Roma to those
outside of Nova Roma.

Appius Claudius Priscus you are a danger to Nova Roma. Your extremist views
are incompatible with the vision of Nova Roma. I suggested to you in
private, that you chose to make public, the option of respectfully resigning
your citizenship to ensure public concordia. You rejected this suggestion
prefering to take the matter public. I have faith in the the citizens of
Nova Roma that they will not openly embrace a Nazi rendering of our Beloved
Rome.

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Consul

On 6/4/06, appiusclaudiuspriscus <appiusclaudiuspriscus@...> wrote:
[snip]

Consul Modianus has said that I am a "danger" because I have not
> denied to him that I (am?/was?/know?) something called a "neo-Nazi".
> Let him, or anyone, accuse me of something that is a capital crime,
> and sign it. Let there be a trial with a judge, a jury, and a defense
> lawyer like Cicero.


[snip]

Valete,
> Appius Claudius Priscus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44112 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE [to exile Appius Claudius Priscus]
In a message dated 6/4/2006 5:41:26 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
appiusclaudiuspriscus@... writes:

Consul Modianus has said that I am a "danger" because I have not
denied to him that I (am?/was?/know?) something called a "neo-Nazi".
Let him, or anyone, accuse me of something that is a capital crime,
and sign it. Let there be a trial with a judge, a jury, and a defense
lawyer like Cicero.

Mommsen's History of Rome says loss of citizenship included exile;
loss of citizenship without exile was impossible. The bill before the
Senate even calls it expulsion. So, it is exile, and this is a
capital proceeding.

The greatest danger to Rome, is not the opinions of Appius Claudius
Priscus, assiduus & plebeian citizen. The greatest danger to Rome, is
that Rome, by repudiating rule of law even once, in a capital
proceeding, will forever disqualify itself from being taken seriously
as a real state.

"To call another man to account for his conduct is to impose upon
ourselves the necessity of integrity, of self-restraint, of all the
virtues, especially if, as I have said, our action is due to no motive
other than the public advantage."

- Cicero, 2nd Speech Against Verres, Bk. 3, I.1, Greenwood translation.

Valete,
Appius Claudius Priscus






Oh please... Cut the crap. You acted as a disruptive force in dealing with
the federal government with an un authorized offer in NOVA ROMA INC. BoD
names. Personally I don't care about your beliefs; you are in the USA so believe
what you want. My mother's side of the family were all in the Party in the
30s and 40s. So that doesn't cut any ice with me. But by hurting our
business with your unauthorized offer in our name means you have overstepped the
authority which you agreed to when you joined us. Since none of the board of
directors of ever approved of your offer, you did it illegally. So that's it
cut and dried. I'm willing to refund your dues out of my own pocket, since
you joined under a misunderstanding of what Nova Roma INC is all about. You
just go your way, and we will go ours

Stephen Phenow
Member Board of Directors
NOVA ROMA INC.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44113 From: Tita Artoria Marcella Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE [to exile Appius Claudius Priscus]
Salve Claudi Prisce,

>Consul Modianus has said that I am a "danger" because I have not
>denied to him that I (am?/was?/know?) something called a "neo-Nazi".

So are you a neo-Nazi? Were you one? You have not said. And did you contact the U.S. government on behalf of Nova Roma?

Vale,
Artoria



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44114 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-06-04
Subject: Appius Claudius Priscus--Please contact me.
F. Galerius Aurelianus Appio Claudio Prisco Salve.

I have tried to reach you via your yahoo address but have been unsuccessful.
I have some questions for you concerning some of the points that have been
raised about you. I would appreciate it if you would email me at
_padruigtheuncle@..._ (mailto:padruigtheuncle@...) . This is not an official
request in any of my capacities in Nova Roma and is purely private. I hope to
be hearing from you.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44115 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Appius Claudius Priscus--Please contact me.
M. Hortensia App. Claudio Prisco Aureliano spd;
no, the discussion with Priscus should be kept to the
Mainlist.
Prisce, I'd be highly interested in your opinions.
Marca Hortensia Maior, Judaea

> F. Galerius Aurelianus Appio Claudio Prisco Salve.
>
> I have tried to reach you via your yahoo address but have been
unsuccessful.
> I have some questions for you concerning some of the points that
have been
> raised about you. I would appreciate it if you would email me at
> _padruigtheuncle@..._ (mailto:padruigtheuncle@...) . This is not
an official
> request in any of my capacities in Nova Roma and is purely
private. I hope to
> be hearing from you.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44116 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE [to exile Appius Claudius Priscus]
Salvete omnes.

The use of the Senatus consultum ultimum is a serious matter. Used
in this case it authorizes the Consuls to expel a citizen,
notwithstanding the Constitution and the rights it grants to someone
facing such a fate to have the matter placed before the people.

The use of the Senatus consultum ultimum provides our Senate with
the means to deal with an imminent danger to Nova Roma where the
normal processes of law are insufficient to deal with that threat.
The only alternative is to appoint a dictator and where there is
only an imminent danger rather than an imminent catastrophe, the
Senatus consultum ultimum is the preferred choice.

The continued presence of Appius Claudius Priscus as a citizen of
Nova Roma constitutes a threat to Nova Roma sufficient to justify
the passing of the Senatus consultum ultimum, only if the normal
process of expulsion is too lengthy to deal with this matter without
risking that survival.

Inevitably, this must hinge on what the consequences of the
suggestion he allegedly made to the US government are to Nova Roma.
Is our incorporated status under imminent threat? Will Nova Roma be
classed as a subversive organization unless he is expelled forthwith
under the terms of the Senatus consultum ultimum?

Any macronational political views a citizen holds, however odious
they may be to people, are only of consequence when considering
whether to implement the Senatus consultum ultimum if,

1. That citizen espouses them within Nova Roma's official lists and
thereby causes a breakdown of the public peace, to such a degree
that the cohesive nature of our community comes under threat.
2. Espousing them is a macronational criminal offence.
3. Such views are a threat to the national security of the USA.

Equally a citizen's membership of, or close association with, a
political party or group is only of consequence if,

1. Knowledge of that membership causes a breakdown of the public
peace, to such a degree that the cohesive nature of our community
comes under threat.
2. Membership or association is a macronational criminal offence.
3. Such a party or group is classed as a threat to the national
security of the USA.

The laws of the USA and its national security have to be paramount
in this case as our incorporated status is subject to those laws, as
are its citizens who are also members of Nova Roma, which constitute
a large number.

If the danger to Nova Roma is not imminent then the normal
provisions of the Constitution concerning expulsion can deal quite
adequately with such a matter. Clearly, it will be the
responsibility of the sponsors of this motion before the Senate to
make the case for the existence of that imminent danger. If not and
the Senatus consultum ultimum passes regardless, then we will be
expelling this man as punishment for his views. In this case, I
doubt anyone would shed any tears over his departure, since such
views he allegedly holds are so clearly beyond the pail for probably
everyone else in Nova Roma. The easiest course of action would be to
heave him through the doors of Nova Roma on the end of a consular
boot.

The easy way however is not always the right way, and however much
support there maybe in this case for immediate action, if there is
no imminent danger should not the normal processes be followed?
Macronationally the easiest course of action when the Nazis were
captured at the end of WWII would have been to summarily execute the
lot of them, but it was judged necessary to accord them the very
rights and privileges of trial and justice that they had denied to
others. Since that time the world has seen fit to arraign all sorts
of disgusting despots and war criminals, expending vast amounts of
time and money on their trials. We see such a trial in Iraq now.
None of this is easy, but unquestionably it is right thing to do,
for to take the easy course and expend only the cost of one bullet
would be to further erode the value of law.

If the world we live in accords such rights to the very worst of
humanity, then should we not accord the normal rights of trial to a
citizen, regardless of any views he may or may not hold if the
danger has past, the damage already done? Should the normal
processes of our laws not take their course? If we really are a
community of decent people we will deliver the right verdict if
whoever prosecutes this man makes their case under the laws of Nova
Roma.

However much we may hold a person and/or their views in disgust we
diminish our own rights each time that we rush to do what we believe
everyone will support, for the sake of expediency. If the danger
exists now, and is clear and irrefutable, then I hope the Senatus
consultum ultimum passes to preserve Nova Roma Inc. and thus the Res
Publica. If the danger does not exist then, however tedious and
inconvenient it maybe, he should face trial according to the law.

As a note to Appius Claudius Priscus, don't even bother to write to
ask me to consider acting as your advocate based on what I have
written here. My objective is to support the due process of our
laws, but my hope is that if the allegations were proven in a trial
you be heaved as far as possible out of our gates. Modianus Consul
has made a compelling case for ejecting you from Nova Roma, and if a
trial were to take place I would listen to what you had to say, but
nothing short of a complete denial with substantial factual proof to
support that denial would alter my intention to vote for your
expulsion. You would have the very opportunity to defend yourself
that your alleged ideology would deny to others.

Now we have to trust the Senate to make the right decision, whatever
that maybe, armed as they are with the facts of the case and the
laws of Nova Roma and the mos maiorum of antiquity.

Valete
Cn. Iulius Caesar


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "David Kling (Modianus)"
<tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Appio Claudio Prisco salutem dicit
>
> You speak as if you consider the label of neo-Nazi a badge of
honor. It is
> not. It is a disgusting and despicable ideology. As was reported
by one of
> the Tribunes I have convened the Senate of Nova Roma to issue a
Senatus
> Consultum Ultimum investing both Consuls with the authority to
expel you
> from Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44117 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: to exile Appius Claudius Priscus
Salvete all,

I've spoken to both Appius Claudius and Consul Modianus offlist during the last two days. Since I
was wrongfully accused of being a fascist in 1999 and a witch-hunt was launched against me, I wanted
to make sure that this person was not being wrongfully accused. For your info, the people who
accused me have long since apologized and two weeks ago I had a great time chatting with one of the
them about many things, including Nova Roma. In fact, it was the best conversation that I had all
day.

Appius Claudius is not being wrongfully accused. I respect him for being so open about his beliefs,
even though I don't agree with most of it.

NR has citizens from around the world: different colours, religions and nationalities. This is how
we want it because this is what Ancient Rome was all about. Some of Appius's posts were purely
macro-politics and have no place here. Honestly, I don't know why Appius Claudius wants to stay a
citizen in the first place.

While I've disagreed with Consul Modianus in the past, but this time I agree. His job here is to
defend Nova Roma and this is what he is doing. His hand was forced by Appius Claudius when he
represented NR to the US govenment. The Senate/BoD would get pissed off if anyone did that, let
alone someone who is known for his extreme-right politics. Modianus really has no other choice but
to act.

All I can say is that I'm glad this didn't happen when I was a Tribune and I don't envy the position
of our Consul Modianus....
Valete
Diana Octavia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44118 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: David Meadow's Explorator
Salve Romans

FYI

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

================================================================
ANCIENT GREECE AND ROME (AND CLASSICS)
================================================================
Plenty of coverage of the discovery of a 10th century B.C./C.E.
skeleton in the Imperial Fora:

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Science/2006/05/31/1607967-ap.html<about:blank>
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/ap/20060529/skeleton_arc.html<about:blank>
http://tinyurl.com/nl2ze<about:blank> (AP via Yahoo)
http://tinyurl.com/nefdd<about:blank> (CNN)
http://tinyurl.com/lequj<about:blank> (ABC)
http://tinyurl.com/o3bzm<about:blank> (USA Today)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13059675/<about:blank>
http://news.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=801632006<about:blank>
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,197451,00.html<about:blank>
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20060531/D8HUEQB80.html<about:blank>
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,13509-2203907,00.html<about:blank>
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5031974.stm<about:blank>

Robert Ballard will be looking for evidence of the Minoans off
the shores of Crete:

http://tinyurl.com/qswk4<about:blank> (Reuters via Yahoo)

Hope we get a photo of this one soon ... a newly-discovered
mosaic near Rome has an optical illusion built into it:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/italy/story/0,,1789630,00.html<about:blank>

A Roman villa found near Cheddar:

http://tinyurl.com/mq8qs<about:blank> (Mercury)

I think we've mentioned the threat to these Southwark Roman
(maybe) remains last week:

http://arts.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1786849,00.html<about:blank>

Tons of coverage of the (re)examination of the Derveni Papyrus:

http://www.physorg.com/news68542835.html<about:blank>
http://tinyurl.com/jnjpo<about:blank> (AP via Yahoo ... slideshow)
http://www.theeagle.com/stories/060306/faith_20060603021.php<about:blank>
http://www.livescience.com/history/060601_ap_book.html<about:blank>
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/272517_scroll02.html<about:blank>
http://tinyurl.com/k5678<about:blank> (USA Today)
http://tinyurl.com/lfjym<about:blank> (ABC)
http://www.azstarnet.com/dailystar/news/131847.php<about:blank>
http://tinyurl.com/nla2m<about:blank> (CTV)
http://tinyurl.com/r9352<about:blank> (Kathimerini)

On Roman wine:

http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/14730726.htm<about:blank>

Restoration of the catacombs at Mylos has been delayed (again):

http://tinyurl.com/q4jn6<about:blank> (Kathimerini)


The Star-Ledger has a nice profile of rising Classics star
Dan-El Padilla Peralta:

http://tinyurl.com/llza8<about:blank>

Photos of images of ancient Rome in a major sandcastle
competition (amazing):

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/5033996.stm<about:blank>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/gall/0,,1787982,00.html<about:blank>

.. the story:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2207417,00.html<about:blank>

Review of a collection of Housman letters:

http://books.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,,1788971,00.html<about:blank>

Recent reviews from BMCR:

http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/recent.html<about:blank>

Recent reviews from Scholia:

http://www.classics.und.ac.za/reviews/2006.htm<about:blank>

Visit our blog:

http://www.atrium-media.com/rogueclassicism<http://www.atrium-media.com/rogueclassicism>

================================================================
Explorator is Copyright (c) 2006 David Meadows. Feel free to
distribute these listings via email to your pals, students,
teachers, etc., but please include this copyright notice. These
links are not to be posted to any website by any means (whether
by direct posting or snagging from a usenet group or some other
email source) without my express written permission. I think it
is only right that I be made aware of public fora which are
making use of content gathered in Explorator. Thanks!







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44119 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Non. Iunius
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est Nonis Iuniis; haec dies nefastus est.

"I asked whether I should assign the Nones to Sancus,
Or Fidius, or you Father Semo: Sancus answered me:
`Whichever you assign it to, the honour's mine:
I bear all three names: so Cures willed it.'
The Sabines of old granted him a shrine accordingly,
And established it on the Quirinal Hill." - Ovid, Fasti VI


"The same thing the more ancient name of Jupiter shows even better,
for of old He was called Diovis and Diespater; that is, dies pater
(Day Father), from whence sub divo (under the sky) and Dius Fidius
(God of Good Faith) is derived. Thus from this reason the roof of His
temple is pierced with a hole, that in this way the divum, which is
the caelum (sky), may be seen. Some say that it is improper to take an
oath by His name when you are under a roof. Aelius (Stilo) said that
Dius Fidius was a son of Diovis, just as the Greeks call Castor
Dioskoron (Son of Zeus), and he thought that He was Sancus in the
Sabine tongue and Hercules in Greek." - Varro, de Lingua Latina V.66

Semo Sancus was served by the company of priests called the Bidental.
He was likely a pre-Roman sky god. His name as Dius Fidius was used as
an oath, the oath being taken in the unroofed compluvium of a house,
under the open sky, and the god's temple had a hole in the roof open
to the sky also. Fidius is therefore connected to Jupiter. As the god
of oaths, he protected the sanctity of the marriage tie, the rights of
hospitality, international treaties and alliances.

This Sabine cult is said to have been introduced into Rome by Titus
Tatius, but the construction of the temple is generally ascribed to
the last Tarquin, although it was dedicated by Sp. Postumius many
years later, 5th June, 466 BC It contained a bronze statue of
Tanaquil, her distaff and spindle, and a wooden shield covered with
ox-hide, which was a memorial of the league between Rome and Gabii,
and, after the destruction of Privernum in 329 BC, bronze wheels made
of the proceeds of the confiscated property of Vitruvius.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Varro, Smith's Dictionary
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44120 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE [to exile Appius Claudius Priscus]
M Moravius Piscinus Tr. Pl. Senatoribus et Quiritibus S. P. D.

Tribunus Plebis Gnaeus Astur has issued an intercessio on behalf of
Appius Claudius Priscus. The matter of concern does not involve the
personal views of Civis Claudius, nor his association with any other
organization, but rather with actions he has taken on behalf of Nova
Roma in defiance of instruction he received from a Fetial and member
of a Consul's staff. Both Consules and both Praetores joined
together to bring the request for a senatusconsultus ultimun before
the Senate. The Senate was to determine whether or not the actions
taken by Civis Claudius posed such a threat to Nova Roma, Inc. and
its members as to warrant immediate action be taken under an SCU.

At this time I am forwarding the intercessio of Tribunus Astur to
the Nova Roma main list solely for informational purposes. I will
weigh the issues before determining whether to join with or oppose
my colleagues' intercessio.

Q. B. F. Q. sit



CN·SALVIVS·ASTVR·SENATORIBVS·CIVIBVSQVE·S·P·D

S·V·B·E·E·V

I, Gnaeus Salvius Astur, as tribunus plebis of Nova Roma, hereby
issue
INTERCESSIO against the following Senate agenda:

> CONVENING OF THE SENATE – June 4, 2006 (2759)
>
> The Senate is called to order June 4, 2006 (2759) by
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, Consul, Pontifex, Augur
> The auspices being favorable the Senate is hereby called into
> session to consider the following matter:
>
> APPIUS CLAUDIUS PRISCUS.The order shall commence as follows:
>
> Intention period from the time of this message to last 24 hours,
and
> at this time the tribunes can issue intercession if they feel it
> necessary.
>
> On June 4th [10:35 AM EST/4:35 PM Roman Time] the Contio period
> shall commence and shall last for 96 hours (4 days) until June 8th
> [10:35 AM EST/4:35 PM Roman Time].
>
> On June 8th [10:35 AM EST/4:35 PM Roman Time] voting shall commence
> and shall last 48 hours (2 days) and shall end on June 10th [10:35
> AM EST/4:35 PM Roman Time].
>
> This senate session will Address one issue only: Appius Claudius
> Priscus.
>
> Senatus Consultum Ultimum
>
> The Senate of Nova Roma issues a Senatus Consultum Ultimum, and
> invests in the Consuls of Nova Roma the authority to temporarily
> suspend the Constitution of Nova Roma in order to expel citizen
> Appius Claudius Priscus from citizenship (ie., membership) within
> Nova Roma. This Senatus Consultum Ultimum grants this authority to
> the Consuls only to address the status of citizen Appius Claudius
> Priscus and for no other purpose. The Senate authorizes the
Consuls
> to expel Appius Claudius Priscus from Nova Roma and authorizes no
> other action against Appius Claudius Priscus. Once this action
> occurs the authority invested in the Consuls shall cease.

My reasoning is that a Senatus Consultum Ultimum is neither necessary
not desirable in this case, and that this proposal vulnerates the
rights of the citizenry to a fair trial, according to our own laws.

Nobody should be thrown out without being condemned by a Nova Roma
tribunal. We have laws, and we have to abide to them.

CVRATE·VT·VALEATIS

CN·SALVIVS·T·F·A·NEP·OVF·ASTVR·SCRIPSIT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44121 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE [to exile Appius Claudius Priscus]
C. Equitius Cato M. Moravio Piscino Cn. Salvio Asturi sal.

Salvete, tribunes.

I'm confused - why was this not issued in the Forum to begin with?
When would we have heard about it otherwise?

Valete bene,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@...> wrote:
>
> M Moravius Piscinus Tr. Pl. Senatoribus et Quiritibus S. P. D.
>
> Tribunus Plebis Gnaeus Astur has issued an intercessio on behalf of
> Appius Claudius Priscus. The matter of concern does not involve the
> personal views of Civis Claudius, nor his association with any other
> organization, but rather with actions he has taken on behalf of Nova
> Roma in defiance of instruction he received from a Fetial and member
> of a Consul's staff. Both Consules and both Praetores joined
> together to bring the request for a senatusconsultus ultimun before
> the Senate. The Senate was to determine whether or not the actions
> taken by Civis Claudius posed such a threat to Nova Roma, Inc. and
> its members as to warrant immediate action be taken under an SCU.
>
> At this time I am forwarding the intercessio of Tribunus Astur to
> the Nova Roma main list solely for informational purposes. I will
> weigh the issues before determining whether to join with or oppose
> my colleagues' intercessio.
>
> Q. B. F. Q. sit
>
>
>
> CN·SALVIVS·ASTVR·SENATORIBVS·CIVIBVSQVE·S·P·D
>
> S·V·B·E·E·V
>
> I, Gnaeus Salvius Astur, as tribunus plebis of Nova Roma, hereby
> issue
> INTERCESSIO against the following Senate agenda:
>
> > CONVENING OF THE SENATE – June 4, 2006 (2759)
> >
> > The Senate is called to order June 4, 2006 (2759) by
> > Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, Consul, Pontifex, Augur
> > The auspices being favorable the Senate is hereby called into
> > session to consider the following matter:
> >
> > APPIUS CLAUDIUS PRISCUS.The order shall commence as follows:
> >
> > Intention period from the time of this message to last 24 hours,
> and
> > at this time the tribunes can issue intercession if they feel it
> > necessary.
> >
> > On June 4th [10:35 AM EST/4:35 PM Roman Time] the Contio period
> > shall commence and shall last for 96 hours (4 days) until June 8th
> > [10:35 AM EST/4:35 PM Roman Time].
> >
> > On June 8th [10:35 AM EST/4:35 PM Roman Time] voting shall commence
> > and shall last 48 hours (2 days) and shall end on June 10th [10:35
> > AM EST/4:35 PM Roman Time].
> >
> > This senate session will Address one issue only: Appius Claudius
> > Priscus.
> >
> > Senatus Consultum Ultimum
> >
> > The Senate of Nova Roma issues a Senatus Consultum Ultimum, and
> > invests in the Consuls of Nova Roma the authority to temporarily
> > suspend the Constitution of Nova Roma in order to expel citizen
> > Appius Claudius Priscus from citizenship (ie., membership) within
> > Nova Roma. This Senatus Consultum Ultimum grants this authority to
> > the Consuls only to address the status of citizen Appius Claudius
> > Priscus and for no other purpose. The Senate authorizes the
> Consuls
> > to expel Appius Claudius Priscus from Nova Roma and authorizes no
> > other action against Appius Claudius Priscus. Once this action
> > occurs the authority invested in the Consuls shall cease.
>
> My reasoning is that a Senatus Consultum Ultimum is neither necessary
> not desirable in this case, and that this proposal vulnerates the
> rights of the citizenry to a fair trial, according to our own laws.
>
> Nobody should be thrown out without being condemned by a Nova Roma
> tribunal. We have laws, and we have to abide to them.
>
> CVRATE·VT·VALEATIS
>
> CN·SALVIVS·T·F·A·NEP·OVF·ASTVR·SCRIPSIT
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44122 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE [to exile Appius Claudius Priscus]
It was posted to the Nova Roma Announce list.

Valete:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 6/5/06, gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato M. Moravio Piscino Cn. Salvio Asturi sal.
>
> Salvete, tribunes.
>
> I'm confused - why was this not issued in the Forum to begin with?
> When would we have heard about it otherwise?
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44123 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Appius Claudius Priscus - Petitio Actionis
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

Citizens of Nova Roma:

A few days ago, as I have illustrated and as was reported by one of the
Tribunes, I convened the Senate of Nova Roma to issue a Senatus Consultum
Ultimum giving both Consuls the authority to expel Appius Claudius Priscus
from Nova Roma. The grounds being not only his association with neo-Nazi
and racists organizations but also because he has contacted macronational
authorities, namely the USA, to attempt to gain a grant to establish Nova
Roma as an "independant" country in modern day Iraq/Iran. He was advised
that Nova Roma was not interested in his scheme, and also told not to
contact US government officials in the name of Nova Roma.

The Senate of Nova Roma has discussed the best course of action. Several
senators feel that a Senatus Consultum Ultimum is unnecessary. Tribune Gn.
Salvius Astur issued an intercessio against my proposed Senatus Consultum
Ultimum. According to a Senatus Consultum indicating senate proceedures
Tribunes have 24 hours in which to veto a proposed senate session. Astur's
veto was not issued within this 24 hour period. However, I do not wish for
the senate to become divided over issues of proceedure.

The real issue is whether or not Appius Claudius Priscus is a danger to Nova
Roma. I believe he is, and in order to keep the focus on the issue at hand
I have withdrawn the Senatus Consultum Ultimum.

After issuing his intercessio Tribune Gn. Salvius Astur submitted a Petitio
Actionis against Appius Claudius Priscus and as Consul I have accepted the
Petitio and will hear the case myself.

Appius Claudius Priscus will have his trial.

Valete:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Consul


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44124 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Issue of Timing...Tribune Intercessio
Pompeia Minucia Strabo Quiritibus Novae Romae S.P.D.

I am going to get something off my chest...regardless of the outcome of the current situation. I take issue with the timing and therefore the legality of this recent Tribune intercessio, I'm afraid. In view of the fact that there are those who think an Senatus Consultum Ultimum, although legal, is 'overkill' in this situation, or sets a dangerous precedent, I think the unaddressed ill-timing of an intercessio sets more of a dangerous precedent, as intercessios occur more frequently than SCU. Intercessions have to be lawful also, no?




I can see where this could create confusion, but I believe the Tribunes have 24 hours to veto ( not 72) a Senate call.

See the link please here:


http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2003-11-11-i.html

The constitution states that the Senate may pass consultum to determine its own internal procedures, and that these particular consulta cannot be overridden by the laws of comitia. The above link displays the prevailing document.

And this link directly below is to the constitution...see 'Senate' section...by which these types of consulta are so protected.

http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/constitution.html

The Lex Labiena de Intercessio with its 72 hours can only apply to comitia procedures.. As pointed out,it cannot override a Senatus Consultum on the Senate's internal procedures. Here is this law:
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-02-26-i.html

Moreover, the process for intercollegial handling of Tribune intercessio is in the constitution also.... but there is no time limit assigned to this process at all; such is detailed in subordinate legislation.... for the comitia, 72 hours (lex Labienia), the Senate Calls, 24 hours from the time of issuance of the Senate call (Senatus Consultum on Senate procedures...again see the first link above) and you can see again in the constitution the language of Tribune intercessio process:
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/constitution.html
(in the magistrate's section, listing the duties, authorities, etc)


Mind you I have no problem with the timing of discussion/actions amongst the tribunes AFTER intercessio is INITIALLY pronounced being legally acceptable as 72 hours, as this is the only legal yardstick we seem to have for that....but in speaking of the time frame allotted in a Senatus Call in which to initiate an intercessio, I read it as 24 hours. Again, please see the first link above, for the particular Senatus Consultum

And a careful examination of this consultum seems to define well the 24 hour intention time for intercessio as being from the time of the initial Senate call....not the time it was announced by the Tribune to the populace. In both cases, the recent intercessio is not timely, and as I read things, it is legally inappropriate.



Valete

Pompeia Minucia Strabo
Consul


.










__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com


SPONSORED LINKS
Politics American politics Government

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "SenatusRomanus" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
SenatusRomanus-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44125 From: Shadow DarkFyre Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Fwd: Pagan Victory in English Court Law EDITED POST
Where can I find this story.


appiusclaudiuspriscus <appiusclaudiuspriscus@...> wrote:
Salvete omnes!

While I applaud this victory, nowadays the government's only "God" is "Political Correctness". I was just expelled from Nova Roma for refusing to worship that "God".

Valete,

Appius Claudius Priscus

**********************************************************************
Moderator's note:

I have edited Appius Claudius Priscus post to remove communication that was between him and the Censors and Consuls of Nova Roma.

He has NOT been expelled from Nova Roma but he was asked to voluntarily resign to avoid any public discord.

If he wants to explain why he can.

Any expulsions and loss of citizenship from Nova Roma will be conducted according to law.

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetor







SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history Citizenship test Nova Us citizenship test Citizenship test questions

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





There's magick in believing...
-The Domain and Realms
http://thedomainandrealms.batcave.net


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44126 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Issue of Timing...Tribune Intercessio
Salve Consul

I think we should put off this discussion until the current matter
is settled.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Pompeia Minucia Strabo
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> Pompeia Minucia Strabo Quiritibus Novae Romae S.P.D.
>
> I am going to get something off my chest...regardless of the
outcome of the current situation. I take issue with the timing and
therefore the legality of this recent Tribune intercessio, I'm
afraid. In view of the fact that there are those who think an
Senatus Consultum Ultimum, although legal, is 'overkill' in this
situation, or sets a dangerous precedent, I think the unaddressed
ill-timing of an intercessio sets more of a dangerous precedent, as
intercessios occur more frequently than SCU. Intercessions have to
be lawful also, no?
>
>
>
>
> I can see where this could create confusion, but I believe the
Tribunes have 24 hours to veto ( not 72) a Senate call.
>
> See the link please here:
>
>
> http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2003-11-11-i.html
>
> The constitution states that the Senate may pass consultum to
determine its own internal procedures, and that these particular
consulta cannot be overridden by the laws of comitia. The above link
displays the prevailing document.
>
> And this link directly below is to the
constitution...see 'Senate' section...by which these types of
consulta are so protected.
>
> http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/constitution.html
>
> The Lex Labiena de Intercessio with its 72 hours can only apply
to comitia procedures.. As pointed out,it cannot override a Senatus
Consultum on the Senate's internal procedures. Here is this law:
> http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-02-26-i.html
>
> Moreover, the process for intercollegial handling of Tribune
intercessio is in the constitution also.... but there is no time
limit assigned to this process at all; such is detailed in
subordinate legislation.... for the comitia, 72 hours (lex
Labienia), the Senate Calls, 24 hours from the time of issuance of
the Senate call (Senatus Consultum on Senate procedures...again see
the first link above) and you can see again in the constitution the
language of Tribune intercessio process:
> http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/constitution.html
> (in the magistrate's section, listing the duties, authorities,
etc)
>
>
> Mind you I have no problem with the timing of discussion/actions
amongst the tribunes AFTER intercessio is INITIALLY pronounced being
legally acceptable as 72 hours, as this is the only legal yardstick
we seem to have for that....but in speaking of the time frame
allotted in a Senatus Call in which to initiate an intercessio, I
read it as 24 hours. Again, please see the first link above, for the
particular Senatus Consultum
>
> And a careful examination of this consultum seems to define well
the 24 hour intention time for intercessio as being from the time of
the initial Senate call....not the time it was announced by the
Tribune to the populace. In both cases, the recent intercessio is
not timely, and as I read things, it is legally inappropriate.
>
>
>
> Valete
>
> Pompeia Minucia Strabo
> Consul
>
>
> .
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Politics American politics Government
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "SenatusRomanus" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> SenatusRomanus-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44127 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: A REAL DANGER
Severus Buteone Modiano omnibusque sal.

Plurimas gratias for your explanation, Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Consul. I have been reading the postings about Appius Claudius Priscus and I agree without hesitation: he is a danger for Nova Roma. I hope our authorities will proceed as soon as possible to protect our community.

Vale, et valete optime,

M•IVL•SEVERVS

PROPRÆTOR•PROVINCIƕMEXICO
ROGATOR
INTERPRETER
SCRIBA•CENSORIS•GEM
MVSÆVS•COLLEGII•ERATOVS•SODALITATIS•MVSARVM
SOCIVS•CHORI•MVSARVM


--
_______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.

Powered by Outblaze
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44128 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Issue of Timing...Tribune Intercessio
M Moravius Piscinus Tr. Pl. Consulibus Fabio Buteoni et Minuciae
Straboni et Quiritibus

Your reference to a 24 hour period is to a senatus consultus
concerning internal procedures of the Senate. Such a senatus
consultus does not overrule the Constitution or and leges passed by
a Comitia. Refer to the Constitution I.B:

Legal precedence. This Constitution shall be the highest legal
authority within Nova Roma, apart from edicts issued by a legally
appointed dictator. It shall thereafter be followed in legal
authority by edicta issued by consuls acting under the Senatus
consulta ultima, laws properly voted and passed by one of the
comitia, decreta passed by the collegium pontificum, decreta passed
by the collegium augurum, Senatus consulta, and magisterial edicta
(in order of descending authority as described in section IV of this
Constitution), in that order. Should a lower authority conflict with
a higher authority, the higher authority shall take precedence.

The LEX LABIENA DE INTERCESSIONE II provides that Tribuni Plebis
have upto 72 hours in which to issue an intercessio:

II. A tribunus plebis may use intercessio by making an official
announcement to at least one of Nova Roma's main communications fora
(as defined by the Constitution) within 72 hours of the announcement
of the item or action to be vetoed. The items and actions which
tribuni plebis may use intercessio against are defined in paragraph
IV.A.7.a.1 of the Constitution.


Once an SCU would go into effect, the Constitutions and leges would
be temporarily suspended, and at that point the Tribuni Plebis could
not intevene in any action made by the Consules under an SCU. It
has been expressed to me by Praetor Octavius Pius that once the vote
of the Senate was announced passing an SCU, it would immediately go
into effect. The only time really available, therefore, when a
Tribunus Plebis may intercede in an SCU is when a vote of the Senate
is called. I would find it a very dangerous precedent to set if we
removed this final check on such an extraordinary authority, and I
do not think it would be wise to push the time limit back further,
making it that the Tribuni Plebis would have to intercede before any
Senate deliberations took place.

Tribunus Plebis Salcius Astur was fully within his right to exercise
his constitutional potestes tribunicia as provided under the Lex
Labiena de Intercessione and to ignore any provisions of a senatus
consultus that conflicts with the higher authority of a lex.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Pompeia Minucia Strabo
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> Pompeia Minucia Strabo Quiritibus Novae Romae S.P.D.
>
> I am going to get something off my chest...regardless of the
outcome of the current situation. I take issue with the timing and
therefore the legality of this recent Tribune intercessio, I'm
afraid. In view of the fact that there are those who think an
Senatus Consultum Ultimum, although legal, is 'overkill' in this
situation, or sets a dangerous precedent, I think the unaddressed
ill-timing of an intercessio sets more of a dangerous precedent, as
intercessios occur more frequently than SCU. Intercessions have to
be lawful also, no?
>
>
>
>
> I can see where this could create confusion, but I believe the
Tribunes have 24 hours to veto ( not 72) a Senate call.
>
> See the link please here:
>
>
> http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2003-11-11-i.html
>
> The constitution states that the Senate may pass consultum to
determine its own internal procedures, and that these particular
consulta cannot be overridden by the laws of comitia. The above link
displays the prevailing document.
>
> And this link directly below is to the
constitution...see 'Senate' section...by which these types of
consulta are so protected.
>
> http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/constitution.html
>
> The Lex Labiena de Intercessio with its 72 hours can only apply
to comitia procedures.. As pointed out,it cannot override a Senatus
Consultum on the Senate's internal procedures. Here is this law:
> http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-02-26-i.html
>
> Moreover, the process for intercollegial handling of Tribune
intercessio is in the constitution also.... but there is no time
limit assigned to this process at all; such is detailed in
subordinate legislation.... for the comitia, 72 hours (lex
Labienia), the Senate Calls, 24 hours from the time of issuance of
the Senate call (Senatus Consultum on Senate procedures...again see
the first link above) and you can see again in the constitution the
language of Tribune intercessio process:
> http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/constitution.html
> (in the magistrate's section, listing the duties, authorities,
etc)
>
>
> Mind you I have no problem with the timing of discussion/actions
amongst the tribunes AFTER intercessio is INITIALLY pronounced being
legally acceptable as 72 hours, as this is the only legal yardstick
we seem to have for that....but in speaking of the time frame
allotted in a Senatus Call in which to initiate an intercessio, I
read it as 24 hours. Again, please see the first link above, for the
particular Senatus Consultum
>
> And a careful examination of this consultum seems to define well
the 24 hour intention time for intercessio as being from the time of
the initial Senate call....not the time it was announced by the
Tribune to the populace. In both cases, the recent intercessio is
not timely, and as I read things, it is legally inappropriate.
>
>
>
> Valete
>
> Pompeia Minucia Strabo
> Consul
>
>
> .
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Politics American politics Government
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "SenatusRomanus" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> SenatusRomanus-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44129 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Trial
Salvete omnes,

I am happy the the senate came to a decision to have a trial for
this citizen. It is funny though how history repeats itself. In the
Third Reich many people who disagreed with the state had to eventual
have their day in the People's Court with Judge Roland Fleisher.
Your chances with him were about equal to those of surviving
Caligula in a bad mood with you. He yelled, screamed and belittled
his victims like a hysterical Whirling Dervish but alas he did have
a brilliant mind having graduated cum laude in law. May others were
just quickly processed, condemened without trial and were dispatched
by firing squad, hanging or the German version of the guillotine.
After the war the leadership had their hearings and trials which
they were never willing to give to so many others, Out of the 21 at
Nuremburg, three were even aquitted.

A few years back I joined a yahoo group which studied and debated
the Third Reich. I was thinking it was a forum open to all as
advertised but its owner and moderator turned out to be a NSP
member. From day one he did not like my attitude. All his arguments
regarding the races and especially Jews contained almost all the
fallacies listed in my fundementals of logic text. He made the
mistake of crossing swords with me and saying that I disgusted him
being married to a hispanic. At that point I gave him a terrific
broadside indicating among many things that various Reich memebers
he worshiped were quite happy to lower their elite racial standards
and suck up and marry or take on hispanic mistresses in Latin
America to escape the hangman's noose... I was thrown of the list
quicker than you can say Jack Robinson. There was no hearing, trial
or discussion by that club about my particular fate.

Now I shall not mention the group or the name of that leader. Why?
Like he always said, the Jews control the most of the media and
unfairly quash anyone that is from his group or disagrees, speaking
out against their dreadful conspiracies. Now I spoke up and got
thrown out ie, shut down. This makes me think if he shuts me down
and only the Jews controlling the media do this then who is this guy
working for; the Mossad? Well I best not jeprodize his cover.

Anyway once again I see our system giving an NSP affliliate better
treatment than the opposite way around.


Regards,

QSP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44130 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Tribunal E-Mail List - Petitio Actionis against Appius Claudius Pri
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

Ex officio

I have established an e-mail list to serve as the tribunal in the petitio
actionis against Appius Claudius Priscus. Any Nova Roma citizen who desires
to witness the proceedings of the trial is welcome to join the list, which
is by invitation only.

If you wish to join this list and bear witness to the proceedings please do
the following:

Send an e-mail to me at: *tau.athanasios@...
*Indicate in the e-mail your name and e-mail address so I can verify you are
a citizen of Nova Roma and send you an invite to join the tribunal list.

Please be advised that an observer on this list will not have posting
privileges. Observers will only be permitted to observe.

Valete:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Consul


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44131 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Issue of Timing...Tribune Intercessio
---

P. Minucia Strabo M. Moravio Piscino Quiritibus S.P.D.

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@...>
wrote:
>
> M Moravius Piscinus Tr. Pl. Consulibus Fabio Buteoni et Minuciae
> Straboni et Quiritibus
>
> Your reference to a 24 hour period is to a senatus consultus
> concerning internal procedures of the Senate. Such a senatus
> consultus does not overrule the Constitution or and leges passby
> a Comitia. Refer to the Constitution I.

Pompeia: In this case, with respect honoured Tribune, such a
consultum is I believe protected, and I'll quote after the legal
precedence you have quoted below....
>
> Legal precedence. This Constitution shall be the highest legal
> authority within Nova Roma, apart from edicts issued by a legally
> appointed dictator. It shall thereafter be followed in legal
> authority by edicta issued by consuls acting under the Senatus
> consulta ultima, laws properly voted and passed by one of the
> comitia, decreta passed by the collegium pontificum, decreta
passed
> by the collegium augurum, Senatus consulta, and magisterial edicta
> (in order of descending authority as described in section IV of
this
> Constitution), in that order. Should a lower authority conflict
with
> a higher authority, the higher authority shall take precedence.

Pompeia: Although nothing is immune from the constitution,
granted ,I quote you from V Constitution F. of the document which
says :

"The Senate may, by Senatus Consultum, enact rules governing its own
internal procedures (such Senatus Consulta may *not* be overruled by
laws passed in the comitia"....so the Lex Labienia's 72-hour
interval for veto cannot override the 24 hour intention time of a
Senatus Consultum regarding the opening of the Senate Call....in my
view.

I know that constitutionally the Tribunes may pronounce intercessio,
but according to the time frames of the appropriate pursuant
legislation...otherwise, the Tribunes wouldn't have to honour any
timeframe for intercessio of anything, theoretically.

But we shall agree to disagree on this one. The matter is academic
now... but these are my issues.

Valete


>
> The LEX LABIENA DE INTERCESSIONE II provides that Tribuni Plebis
> have upto 72 hours in which to issue an intercessio:
>
> II. A tribunus plebis may use intercessio by making an official
> announcement to at least one of Nova Roma's main communications
fora
> (as defined by the Constitution) within 72 hours of the
announcement
> of the item or action to be vetoed. The items and actions which
> tribuni plebis may use intercessio against are defined in
paragraph
> IV.A.7.a.1 of the Constitution.
>
>
> Once an SCU would go into effect, the Constitutions and leges
would
> be temporarily suspended, and at that point the Tribuni Plebis
could
> not intevene in any action made by the Consules under an SCU. It
> has been expressed to me by Praetor Octavius Pius that once the
vote
> of the Senate was announced passing an SCU, it would immediately
go
> into effect. The only time really available, therefore, when a
> Tribunus Plebis may intercede in an SCU is when a vote of the
Senate
> is called. I would find it a very dangerous precedent to set if
we
> removed this final check on such an extraordinary authority, and I
> do not think it would be wise to push the time limit back further,
> making it that the Tribuni Plebis would have to intercede before
any
> Senate deliberations took place.
>
> Tribunus Plebis Salcius Astur was fully within his right to
exercise
> his constitutional potestes tribunicia as provided under the Lex
> Labiena de Intercessione and to ignore any provisions of a senatus
> consultus that conflicts with the higher authority of a lex.
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Pompeia Minucia Strabo
> <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@> wrote:
> >
> > Pompeia Minucia Strabo Quiritibus Novae Romae S.P.D.
> >
> > I am going to get something off my chest...regardless of the
> outcome of the current situation. I take issue with the timing
and
> therefore the legality of this recent Tribune intercessio, I'm
> afraid. In view of the fact that there are those who think an
> Senatus Consultum Ultimum, although legal, is 'overkill' in this
> situation, or sets a dangerous precedent, I think the unaddressed
> ill-timing of an intercessio sets more of a dangerous precedent,
as
> intercessios occur more frequently than SCU. Intercessions have to
> be lawful also, no?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I can see where this could create confusion, but I believe
the
> Tribunes have 24 hours to veto ( not 72) a Senate call.
> >
> > See the link please here:
> >
> >
> > http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2003-11-11-i.html
> >
> > The constitution states that the Senate may pass consultum to
> determine its own internal procedures, and that these particular
> consulta cannot be overridden by the laws of comitia. The above
link
> displays the prevailing document.
> >
> > And this link directly below is to the
> constitution...see 'Senate' section...by which these types of
> consulta are so protected.
> >
> > http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/constitution.html
> >
> > The Lex Labiena de Intercessio with its 72 hours can only
apply
> to comitia procedures.. As pointed out,it cannot override a
Senatus
> Consultum on the Senate's internal procedures. Here is this law:
> > http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-02-26-i.html
> >
> > Moreover, the process for intercollegial handling of Tribune
> intercessio is in the constitution also.... but there is no time
> limit assigned to this process at all; such is detailed in
> subordinate legislation.... for the comitia, 72 hours (lex
> Labienia), the Senate Calls, 24 hours from the time of issuance
of
> the Senate call (Senatus Consultum on Senate procedures...again
see
> the first link above) and you can see again in the constitution
the
> language of Tribune intercessio process:
> > http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/constitution.html
> > (in the magistrate's section, listing the duties, authorities,
> etc)
> >
> >
> > Mind you I have no problem with the timing of
discussion/actions
> amongst the tribunes AFTER intercessio is INITIALLY pronounced
being
> legally acceptable as 72 hours, as this is the only legal
yardstick
> we seem to have for that....but in speaking of the time frame
> allotted in a Senatus Call in which to initiate an intercessio, I
> read it as 24 hours. Again, please see the first link above, for
the
> particular Senatus Consultum
> >
> > And a careful examination of this consultum seems to define
well
> the 24 hour intention time for intercessio as being from the time
of
> the initial Senate call....not the time it was announced by the
> Tribune to the populace. In both cases, the recent intercessio is
> not timely, and as I read things, it is legally inappropriate.
> >
> >
> >
> > Valete
> >
> > Pompeia Minucia Strabo
> > Consul
> >
> >
> > .
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> > Politics American politics Government
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> >
> > Visit your group "SenatusRomanus" on the web.
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > SenatusRomanus-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44132 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Issue of Timing...Tribune Intercessio
---Ave Praetor:


<sigh> I'm asking a question about the nature of the
intercessio....I'm doing little else of any major danger or
disruption at this point.

Do I have to quote you the portion of the Constitution which states
that I have a right to open forums.....???


Goodness
Pompeia




In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tiberius Galerius Paulinus"
<spqr753@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Consul
>
> I think we should put off this discussion until the current matter
> is settled.
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Pompeia Minucia Strabo
> <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@> wrote:
> >
> > Pompeia Minucia Strabo Quiritibus Novae Romae S.P.D.
> >
> > I am going to get something off my chest...regardless of the
> outcome of the current situation. I take issue with the timing
and
> therefore the legality of this recent Tribune intercessio, I'm
> afraid. In view of the fact that there are those who think an
> Senatus Consultum Ultimum, although legal, is 'overkill' in this
> situation, or sets a dangerous precedent, I think the unaddressed
> ill-timing of an intercessio sets more of a dangerous precedent,
as
> intercessios occur more frequently than SCU. Intercessions have to
> be lawful also, no?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I can see where this could create confusion, but I believe
the
> Tribunes have 24 hours to veto ( not 72) a Senate call.
> >
> > See the link please here:
> >
> >
> > http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2003-11-11-i.html
> >
> > The constitution states that the Senate may pass consultum to
> determine its own internal procedures, and that these particular
> consulta cannot be overridden by the laws of comitia. The above
link
> displays the prevailing document.
> >
> > And this link directly below is to the
> constitution...see 'Senate' section...by which these types of
> consulta are so protected.
> >
> > http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/constitution.html
> >
> > The Lex Labiena de Intercessio with its 72 hours can only
apply
> to comitia procedures.. As pointed out,it cannot override a
Senatus
> Consultum on the Senate's internal procedures. Here is this law:
> > http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-02-26-i.html
> >
> > Moreover, the process for intercollegial handling of Tribune
> intercessio is in the constitution also.... but there is no time
> limit assigned to this process at all; such is detailed in
> subordinate legislation.... for the comitia, 72 hours (lex
> Labienia), the Senate Calls, 24 hours from the time of issuance
of
> the Senate call (Senatus Consultum on Senate procedures...again
see
> the first link above) and you can see again in the constitution
the
> language of Tribune intercessio process:
> > http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/constitution.html
> > (in the magistrate's section, listing the duties, authorities,
> etc)
> >
> >
> > Mind you I have no problem with the timing of
discussion/actions
> amongst the tribunes AFTER intercessio is INITIALLY pronounced
being
> legally acceptable as 72 hours, as this is the only legal
yardstick
> we seem to have for that....but in speaking of the time frame
> allotted in a Senatus Call in which to initiate an intercessio, I
> read it as 24 hours. Again, please see the first link above, for
the
> particular Senatus Consultum
> >
> > And a careful examination of this consultum seems to define
well
> the 24 hour intention time for intercessio as being from the time
of
> the initial Senate call....not the time it was announced by the
> Tribune to the populace. In both cases, the recent intercessio is
> not timely, and as I read things, it is legally inappropriate.
> >
> >
> >
> > Valete
> >
> > Pompeia Minucia Strabo
> > Consul
> >
> >
> > .
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> > Politics American politics Government
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> >
> > Visit your group "SenatusRomanus" on the web.
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > SenatusRomanus-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44133 From: Stefanie Beer Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Trial
L.Flavia Lectrix Quinto Suetonio Paulino SPD.

Sorry to have to correct you - the name of the judge you mentioned isn´t
Roland Fleisher but Roland Freisler. He succeded Otto Thierack as President
of the "Volksgerichtshof" onAugust 20, 1942. He died February 1945 during a
bombing attack on Berlin, where he was at that time conducting propaganda
trials on members of the group that was responsible for the assassination
attempt on July 20, 1944.
Vale!

-------Originalmeldung-------

Von: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)
Datum: 06/05/06 19:20:01
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Trial

Salvete omnes,

I am happy the the senate came to a decision to have a trial for
this citizen. It is funny though how history repeats itself. In the
Third Reich many people who disagreed with the state had to eventual
have their day in the People's Court with Judge Roland Fleisher.
Your chances with him were about equal to those of surviving
Caligula in a bad mood with you. He yelled, screamed and belittled
his victims like a hysterical Whirling Dervish but alas he did have
a brilliant mind having graduated cum laude in law. May others were
just quickly processed, condemened without trial and were dispatched
by firing squad, hanging or the German version of the guillotine.
After the war the leadership had their hearings and trials which
they were never willing to give to so many others, Out of the 21 at
Nuremburg, three were even aquitted.

A few years back I joined a yahoo group which studied and debated
the Third Reich. I was thinking it was a forum open to all as
advertised but its owner and moderator turned out to be a NSP
member. From day one he did not like my attitude. All his arguments
regarding the races and especially Jews contained almost all the
fallacies listed in my fundementals of logic text. He made the
mistake of crossing swords with me and saying that I disgusted him
being married to a hispanic. At that point I gave him a terrific
broadside indicating among many things that various Reich memebers
he worshiped were quite happy to lower their elite racial standards
and suck up and marry or take on hispanic mistresses in Latin
America to escape the hangman's noose... I was thrown of the list
quicker than you can say Jack Robinson. There was no hearing, trial
or discussion by that club about my particular fate.

Now I shall not mention the group or the name of that leader. Why?
Like he always said, the Jews control the most of the media and
unfairly quash anyone that is from his group or disagrees, speaking
out against their dreadful conspiracies. Now I spoke up and got
thrown out ie, shut down. This makes me think if he shuts me down
and only the Jews controlling the media do this then who is this guy
working for; the Mossad? Well I best not jeprodize his cover.

Anyway once again I see our system giving an NSP affliliate better
treatment than the opposite way around.


Regards,

QSP







------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
You can search right from your browser? It's easy and it's free. See how.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_7bhrC/NGxNAA/yQLSAA/wWQplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->


Yahoo! Groups Links







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44134 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Trial
Salve Flavia Lectrix,

Thanks! I punched in a typo somehow.

Freisler conducted about 1200 trials amost all of which ended in the
death penalty. His body was found crushed beneath a fallen masonry
column, clutching the file on anti-Hitler conspirator Fabian von
Schlabrendorff.

Regards,

QSP

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Stefanie Beer" <sbeer@...> wrote:
>
> L.Flavia Lectrix Quinto Suetonio Paulino SPD.
>
> Sorry to have to correct you - the name of the judge you mentioned
isn´t
> Roland Fleisher but Roland Freisler. He succeded Otto Thierack as
President
> of the "Volksgerichtshof" onAugust 20, 1942. He died February 1945
during a
> bombing attack on Berlin, where he was at that time conducting
propaganda
> trials on members of the group that was responsible for the
assassination
> attempt on July 20, 1944.
> Vale!
>
> -------Originalmeldung-------
>
> Von: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)
> Datum: 06/05/06 19:20:01
> An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Trial
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I am happy the the senate came to a decision to have a trial for
> this citizen. It is funny though how history repeats itself. In the
> Third Reich many people who disagreed with the state had to
eventual
> have their day in the People's Court with Judge Roland Fleisher.
> Your chances with him were about equal to those of surviving
> Caligula in a bad mood with you. He yelled, screamed and belittled
> his victims like a hysterical Whirling Dervish but alas he did have
> a brilliant mind having graduated cum laude in law. May others were
> just quickly processed, condemened without trial and were
dispatched
> by firing squad, hanging or the German version of the guillotine.
> After the war the leadership had their hearings and trials which
> they were never willing to give to so many others, Out of the 21 at
> Nuremburg, three were even aquitted.
>
> A few years back I joined a yahoo group which studied and debated
> the Third Reich. I was thinking it was a forum open to all as
> advertised but its owner and moderator turned out to be a NSP
> member. From day one he did not like my attitude. All his arguments
> regarding the races and especially Jews contained almost all the
> fallacies listed in my fundementals of logic text. He made the
> mistake of crossing swords with me and saying that I disgusted him
> being married to a hispanic. At that point I gave him a terrific
> broadside indicating among many things that various Reich memebers
> he worshiped were quite happy to lower their elite racial standards
> and suck up and marry or take on hispanic mistresses in Latin
> America to escape the hangman's noose... I was thrown of the list
> quicker than you can say Jack Robinson. There was no hearing, trial
> or discussion by that club about my particular fate.
>
> Now I shall not mention the group or the name of that leader. Why?
> Like he always said, the Jews control the most of the media and
> unfairly quash anyone that is from his group or disagrees, speaking
> out against their dreadful conspiracies. Now I spoke up and got
> thrown out ie, shut down. This makes me think if he shuts me down
> and only the Jews controlling the media do this then who is this
guy
> working for; the Mossad? Well I best not jeprodize his cover.
>
> Anyway once again I see our system giving an NSP affliliate better
> treatment than the opposite way around.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> QSP
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------
~-->
> You can search right from your browser? It's easy and it's free.
See how.
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/_7bhrC/NGxNAA/yQLSAA/wWQplB/TM
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-~->
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44135 From: lvl_silvanvs Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: New Application.......
Salvete
Bona Dea,The New Application is
stupid,http://www.novaroma.org/bin/apply why must one have to take a
test to become a citizen or member of Nova Roma?Its absurd if you ask
me..
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44136 From: appiusclaudiuspriscus Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Appius Claudius Priscus--Please contact me.
Salve Marca Hortensia Maior,

If anyone wishes to email me privately, he's welcome to do so.

Do you know any male Israelis or other male Jews who are NR
citizens, who might be interested in being my advocate? I can pay
one year's U.S. capitation tax. Though my relations with Jews
sometimes have been adversarial, in a situation where Gentiles tend
to become incapacitated with hysteria, a Jew might have the best
chance of accomplishing something worthwhile.

Vale,
Appius Claudius Priscus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia App. Claudio Prisco Aureliano spd;
> no, the discussion with Priscus should be kept to the
> Mainlist.
> Prisce, I'd be highly interested in your opinions.
> Marca Hortensia Maior, Judaea
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44137 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: New Application.......
lvl_silvanvs <lvl_silvanvs@...> writes:

> Salvete
> Bona Dea,The New Application is
> stupid,http://www.novaroma.org/bin/apply why must one have to take a
> test to become a citizen or member of Nova Roma?Its absurd if you ask
> me..

Curiously, nobody did ask you.

You voluntarily revoked your citizenship last year. Now you've applied to
return. Perhaps you should reconsider.

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44138 From: appiusclaudiuspriscus Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Appius Claudius Priscus--Please contact me.
Salvete omnes,

This makes two citizens within the last few days, who have said that
emails to my yahoo.com address aren't going through. Since I'm
on "trial" for "treason against NR" (a "capital crime"), I have a
right to publicize an alternate email address:

kellerj@...

Vale,
Appius Claudius Priscus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:
>
> F. Galerius Aurelianus Appio Claudio Prisco Salve.
>
> I have tried to reach you via your yahoo address but have been
unsuccessful.
> I have some questions for you concerning some of the points that
have been
> raised about you. I would appreciate it if you would email me at
> _padruigtheuncle@..._ (mailto:padruigtheuncle@...) . This is not
an official
> request in any of my capacities in Nova Roma and is purely
private. I hope to
> be hearing from you.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44139 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: The Intercessio Debate
Salve Consul Pompeia Minucia Tiberia

I had suggested that we keep this debate for later but as it seems
to be enjoined I will add my further comments.

First I was not wrong when I stated that the Tribunes have 72 hours
to veto an action that they are allowed to veto. Intercessio as the
good Tribune has pointed out is a grant of power from the
constitution.

The Constitution states that a Praetor can call a Senate meeting in
the absence of both Consul. Can the Senate adopt internal rules to
say otherwise?

NO it can not because the power to call the Senate by
a Praetor or Tribune is granted by the constitution, the highest
organ of the state.

Same with the power to issue an Intercessio it is a power granted to
the Tribunes and NO Senatus consultus can change that fact. When and
only when a Senatus consultum ultimum is in effect do the Tribunes,
like all other magistrate lose the ability to act.

A Senatus consultus establishing the internal rules or procedures of
the Senate does just that and nothing more. It can not at the same
time limit the power or authority of other magistrates or Tribunes.

The Constitutions states among other things that:

"A Nota against a member of the Senate is sufficient to remove that
individual from the Senate until such time as it is removed."

Can the Senate adopt an internal rule that states that when the
Senate is in session Nota's can not be issued?

The constitution states that the Tribunes are "To be privy to the
debates of the SenateÂ…" Can the Senate adopt an internal rule that
states but only on the third Tuesday of the month?

Can the Senate adopt an internal rules that states that when the
Senate is in session Curule Aediles who hold Imperium by
constitutional grant can only exercise it in those months spelled
without an "R"?

Of course it can't

I am sorry Consul but it is you not I who is wrong on this issue.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44140 From: Richard Sciarappa Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: New Application.......
Salve,

The application and the test are very basic.
I don't think it is stupid to see if a potential citizen
is serious about Nova Roma.

Vale,

Lucius Cassius Cornutus

-----Original Message-----
>From: lvl_silvanvs <lvl_silvanvs@...>
>Sent: Jun 5, 2006 2:14 PM
>To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [Nova-Roma] New Application.......
>
>Salvete
>Bona Dea,The New Application is
>stupid,http://www.novaroma.org/bin/apply why must one have to take a
>test to become a citizen or member of Nova Roma?Its absurd if you ask
>me..
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>SPONSORED LINKS
>Ancient historyCitizenship testNovaUs citizenship testCitizenship test questions
>
>YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>*  Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.
> 
>*  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> 
>*  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44141 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: The Intercessio Debate
--- ok!

So, the Tribunes may pronounce intercessio at any time.....because
the constitution is where they get their powers to pronounce
intercessio...(because the Lex Labiena's 72 hours can't be used to
influence the Senatus Consultum on internal procedures, which would
be a Senate call. this is in the constitution also).Never mind the
subordinate legislations pursuant to the constitution...they would
just prolong a needless, complicated discussion.

I'll try not to ask to many questions in the future :)

Pompeia




In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tiberius Galerius Paulinus"
<spqr753@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Consul Pompeia Minucia Tiberia
>
> I had suggested that we keep this debate for later but as it seems
> to be enjoined I will add my further comments.
>
> First I was not wrong when I stated that the Tribunes have 72
hours
> to veto an action that they are allowed to veto. Intercessio as
the
> good Tribune has pointed out is a grant of power from the
> constitution.
>
> The Constitution states that a Praetor can call a Senate meeting
in
> the absence of both Consul. Can the Senate adopt internal rules to
> say otherwise?
>
> NO it can not because the power to call the Senate by
> a Praetor or Tribune is granted by the constitution, the highest
> organ of the state.
>
> Same with the power to issue an Intercessio it is a power granted
to
> the Tribunes and NO Senatus consultus can change that fact. When
and
> only when a Senatus consultum ultimum is in effect do the
Tribunes,
> like all other magistrate lose the ability to act.
>
> A Senatus consultus establishing the internal rules or procedures
of
> the Senate does just that and nothing more. It can not at the same
> time limit the power or authority of other magistrates or
Tribunes.
>
> The Constitutions states among other things that:
>
> "A Nota against a member of the Senate is sufficient to remove
that
> individual from the Senate until such time as it is removed."
>
> Can the Senate adopt an internal rule that states that when the
> Senate is in session Nota's can not be issued?
>
> The constitution states that the Tribunes are "To be privy to the
> debates of the SenateÂ…" Can the Senate adopt an internal rule that
> states but only on the third Tuesday of the month?
>
> Can the Senate adopt an internal rules that states that when the
> Senate is in session Curule Aediles who hold Imperium by
> constitutional grant can only exercise it in those months spelled
> without an "R"?
>
> Of course it can't
>
> I am sorry Consul but it is you not I who is wrong on this issue.
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Praetor
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44142 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: New Application.......
> Salve, Silvane, et salvete, omnes!
>
> Salvete
> Bona Dea,The New Application is
> stupid,http://www.novaroma.org/bin/apply why must one have to take a
> test to become a citizen or member of Nova Roma?Its absurd if you ask
> me..
>
>
> ATS: The citizenship test was instituted in large part because many were
> seeking citizenship on a lark; several left after about two months. Some
> would become citizens and even vote in elections about which they knew next to
> nothing, so we instituted a three-month probationary period and a simple
> citizenship test. That seems to have cut down on the facetious applications
> (and we immediately reject any where deceit can be demonstrated). We welcome
> serious individuals who care about antiquity while agreeing to live by our
> laws and Constitution.
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
> Rogatrix et Scriba Censoris GEM
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44143 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: The Intercessio Debate
Salve Consul Pompeia Minucia Tiberia

I am not always right and neither are you but we should NEVER stop asking questions.

I thought it was a good debate lots of dialogue, and good points on both sides and few if any stones thrown.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


----- Original Message -----
From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia<mailto:pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 5:07 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Intercessio Debate


--- ok!

So, the Tribunes may pronounce intercessio at any time.....because
the constitution is where they get their powers to pronounce
intercessio...(because the Lex Labiena's 72 hours can't be used to
influence the Senatus Consultum on internal procedures, which would
be a Senate call. this is in the constitution also).Never mind the
subordinate legislations pursuant to the constitution...they would
just prolong a needless, complicated discussion.

I'll try not to ask to many questions in the future :)

Pompeia




In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tiberius Galerius Paulinus"
<spqr753@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Consul Pompeia Minucia Tiberia
>
> I had suggested that we keep this debate for later but as it seems
> to be enjoined I will add my further comments.
>
> First I was not wrong when I stated that the Tribunes have 72
hours
> to veto an action that they are allowed to veto. Intercessio as
the
> good Tribune has pointed out is a grant of power from the
> constitution.
>
> The Constitution states that a Praetor can call a Senate meeting
in
> the absence of both Consul. Can the Senate adopt internal rules to
> say otherwise?
>
> NO it can not because the power to call the Senate by
> a Praetor or Tribune is granted by the constitution, the highest
> organ of the state.
>
> Same with the power to issue an Intercessio it is a power granted
to
> the Tribunes and NO Senatus consultus can change that fact. When
and
> only when a Senatus consultum ultimum is in effect do the
Tribunes,
> like all other magistrate lose the ability to act.
>
> A Senatus consultus establishing the internal rules or procedures
of
> the Senate does just that and nothing more. It can not at the same
> time limit the power or authority of other magistrates or
Tribunes.
>
> The Constitutions states among other things that:
>
> "A Nota against a member of the Senate is sufficient to remove
that
> individual from the Senate until such time as it is removed."
>
> Can the Senate adopt an internal rule that states that when the
> Senate is in session Nota's can not be issued?
>
> The constitution states that the Tribunes are "To be privy to the
> debates of the Senate." Can the Senate adopt an internal rule that
> states but only on the third Tuesday of the month?
>
> Can the Senate adopt an internal rules that states that when the
> Senate is in session Curule Aediles who hold Imperium by
> constitutional grant can only exercise it in those months spelled
> without an "R"?
>
> Of course it can't
>
> I am sorry Consul but it is you not I who is wrong on this issue.
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Praetor
>







SPONSORED LINKS Ancient history<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Ancient+history&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Citizenship+test&w3=Nova&w4=Us+citizenship+test&w5=Citizenship+test+questions&c=5&s=110&.sig=gi3M6rPIJDHzNmuX7X3JBQ> Citizenship test<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Citizenship+test&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Citizenship+test&w3=Nova&w4=Us+citizenship+test&w5=Citizenship+test+questions&c=5&s=110&.sig=8aXDd_kXfq9MRI4EtYMLtg> Nova<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Nova&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Citizenship+test&w3=Nova&w4=Us+citizenship+test&w5=Citizenship+test+questions&c=5&s=110&.sig=SXN0tDQ1L0CkY4njGt1WNA>
Us citizenship test<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Us+citizenship+test&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Citizenship+test&w3=Nova&w4=Us+citizenship+test&w5=Citizenship+test+questions&c=5&s=110&.sig=aAQhDwznWDBiUsSk4aqpqA> Citizenship test questions<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Citizenship+test+questions&w1=Ancient+history&w2=Citizenship+test&w3=Nova&w4=Us+citizenship+test&w5=Citizenship+test+questions&c=5&s=110&.sig=ivi3xvPX-VD2PakGAc-6WA>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "Nova-Roma<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44144 From: Stefanie Beer Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Betreff: Re: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Trial
L.Flavia Lectrix Quinto Suetonio Paulino SPD,
indeed! The death of Freisler probably saved von Schlabrendorff´s life.
Later he served as a judge in the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany.
He too wrote a book about resistance of Army officers in the Third Reich:
Offiziere gegen Hitler" or, in the English translation "Revolt against
Hitler" http://www.amazon
com/gp/product/B0007IZJHE/sr=8-2/qid=1149543217/ref=sr_1_2/104-1285380-414394
?%5Fencoding=UTF8
Bona nox!
Flavia Lectrix

-------Originalmeldung-------

Von: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)
Datum: 06/05/06 21:28:16
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: Re: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Trial

Salve Flavia Lectrix,

Thanks! I punched in a typo somehow.

Freisler conducted about 1200 trials amost all of which ended in the
death penalty. His body was found crushed beneath a fallen masonry
column, clutching the file on anti-Hitler conspirator Fabian von
Schlabrendorff.

Regards,

QSP

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Stefanie Beer" <sbeer@...> wrote:
>
> L.Flavia Lectrix Quinto Suetonio Paulino SPD.
>
> Sorry to have to correct you - the name of the judge you mentioned
isn´t
> Roland Fleisher but Roland Freisler. He succeded Otto Thierack as
President
> of the "Volksgerichtshof" onAugust 20, 1942. He died February 1945
during a
> bombing attack on Berlin, where he was at that time conducting
propaganda
> trials on members of the group that was responsible for the
assassination
> attempt on July 20, 1944.
> Vale!
>
> -------Originalmeldung-------
>
> Von: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)
> Datum: 06/05/06 19:20:01
> An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Trial
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I am happy the the senate came to a decision to have a trial for
> this citizen. It is funny though how history repeats itself. In the
> Third Reich many people who disagreed with the state had to
eventual
> have their day in the People's Court with Judge Roland Fleisher.
> Your chances with him were about equal to those of surviving
> Caligula in a bad mood with you. He yelled, screamed and belittled
> his victims like a hysterical Whirling Dervish but alas he did have
> a brilliant mind having graduated cum laude in law. May others were
> just quickly processed, condemened without trial and were
dispatched
> by firing squad, hanging or the German version of the guillotine.
> After the war the leadership had their hearings and trials which
> they were never willing to give to so many others, Out of the 21 at
> Nuremburg, three were even aquitted.
>
> A few years back I joined a yahoo group which studied and debated
> the Third Reich. I was thinking it was a forum open to all as
> advertised but its owner and moderator turned out to be a NSP
> member. From day one he did not like my attitude. All his arguments
> regarding the races and especially Jews contained almost all the
> fallacies listed in my fundementals of logic text. He made the
> mistake of crossing swords with me and saying that I disgusted him
> being married to a hispanic. At that point I gave him a terrific
> broadside indicating among many things that various Reich memebers
> he worshiped were quite happy to lower their elite racial standards
> and suck up and marry or take on hispanic mistresses in Latin
> America to escape the hangman's noose... I was thrown of the list
> quicker than you can say Jack Robinson. There was no hearing, trial
> or discussion by that club about my particular fate.
>
> Now I shall not mention the group or the name of that leader. Why?
> Like he always said, the Jews control the most of the media and
> unfairly quash anyone that is from his group or disagrees, speaking
> out against their dreadful conspiracies. Now I spoke up and got
> thrown out ie, shut down. This makes me think if he shuts me down
> and only the Jews controlling the media do this then who is this
guy
> working for; the Mossad? Well I best not jeprodize his cover.
>
> Anyway once again I see our system giving an NSP affliliate better
> treatment than the opposite way around.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> QSP
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------
~-->
> You can search right from your browser? It's easy and it's free.
See how.
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/_7bhrC/NGxNAA/yQLSAA/wWQplB/TM
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-~->
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Protect your PC from spy ware with award winning anti spy technology. It's
free.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/97bhrC/LGxNAA/yQLSAA/wWQplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->


Yahoo! Groups Links







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44145 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Appius Claudius Priscus other email address Moderators
Salvete omnes,

That's:

k e l l e r j
@ i a s t a t e . e d u


Valete,
Appius Claudius Priscus

************************

Moderators Note:

Salve Romans

Appius Claudius Priscus is on moderation by order of both Praetors
I have posted this address at Appius Claudius Priscus request.

I am solely responsible for his posts that are sent on to the Forum

The Praetorian staffs are not reviewing his posts,

I am.

I read everything that he posts and I post them with or without comment and with or without modification.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetor



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44146 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
Salvete all,

Since there is going to be a trial, someone needs to represent Appius Claudius. He is a new citizen
and is not familiar with our laws. In the name of fairness, he needs an advocate.

I'm not at all up to speed on the laws that were passed in the last 2 years or with the court
procedure or I would do it. Plus since I will be unemployed in 6 months, I don't ahve the time at
the moment to due a speed course on the law.
.
One of you who know about the law should represent him. This is the fair thing to do. Some of you
have been aching to get involved in a cout case for years-- now's your chance!!

Valete,
Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44147 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: The Intercessio Debate
Salve Consul Pompeia Minucia

The senatus consultus to which you refer concerns how the Senate
conducts itself. The Tribuni Plebis are not technically members of
the Senate in the exercise of their powers, and a senatus consultus
cannot on its own limit the powers of the Tribuni Plebis. Leges can
define how the Tribuni Plebis may exercise what powers the
Constitution grants the Tribuni Plebis. Whenever there is a
conflict between the various levels of our laws, then those laws
stipulated as having a higher authority would take precedence.
Normally we Tribuni Plebis do defer to the Senate's internal rules.
Any normal senatus consultus could be vetoed once it is issued, and
of course the Lex Labiena would apply. In practice there would not
be a conflict, since the Senate's rules on its internal procedures
would not ordinarily limit the constitutional powers of the Tribuni
Plebis, or conflict with the leges that outline how those powers are
to be applied.

A problem of interpretation arises in regard to a senatus consultum
ultimum because the Constitution says, "When in effect." Go back to
my earlier discussion with Praetor Octavius Pius. Does an SCU go
into effect immediately when the Consules announce the decision of
the Senate, or would an SCU go into effect only after the Tribuni
Plebis have an opportunity to review and consider exercising an
intercessio? With the Praetor I took the position that an SCU would
not go into effect until after 72 had passed from its announcement,
as this allows for the Tribuni Plebis to retain their rights and
powers without conflicting with the wording of the Constitution -
"when in effect." But of course others will not agree with my
position.

A call of the Senate to meet generally includes a schedule that
gives when a contio ends and voting is to begin. I have suggested
that these two steps constitute two different actions, and thus that
the Tribuni could intercede when voting began. But of course that,
too, is only one interpretation and I am sure that others would
argue against it. If we interpret the law to mean that the Tribuni
Plebis may only veto within the first 24 hours of the call for the
Senate to meet, that they cannot veto afterwards, then we end up
putting the Tribuni Plebis in a position to squelch Senate debate
when it comes to considering an SCU. Or else we remove the potestes
tribunicia from applying to SCU's at all. I do not think that this
would serve the interests of Nova Roma to eliminate there being any
check on the Senate's authority to issue an SCU, and it certainly
would not benefit Nova Roma if, in practice, it should become a
matter of cutting off the Senate's debate on whether or not to issue
an SCU. Also I believe that such an interpretation would be
contrary to the intent of our body of law.

Currently Nova Roma law places the Tribuni Plebis in an awkwardly
ahistorical position as guardians of the Constitution, where their
historical role concerned more the protection of individual Citizens
and their rights under the law. It is even more awkward here in
that the Tribuni Plebis are not corporate officers and yet are given
powers that can intefer with the corporate duties of our higher
magistrates and the Senate. The Senate, being our Board of
Directors, and the higher magistrates, when acting as corporate
officers, really should not be placed under potential restrictions
imposed by non-corporate officers. Really, in a corporate sense, we
might do better to think of the Tribuni Plebis as omsbundmen that
are intended to assist members, and therefore should reconsider when
and how they are to exercise authority inside Nova Roma. Also
ahistorical is how the Constitution, in how it is written, places
the Tribuni Plebis in lower authority to Aediles, including the
Aediles Plebis, and below Quaestores, yet gives them powers that
exceeds, in a sense, those that they held historically.
Historically they were more on a par with the Paetores in authority,
and of course they did not hold their authority collegeally as Nova
Roma places them in practice.

So there are quite a few issues regarding the role and position of
Tribuni in Nova Roma that may need to be addressed in the future.
But in this particular matter, with regard to the Senate's authority
to issue an SCU, as ahistorical as that authority is, then a correct
role, an historical role, is for the Tribuni Plebis to concern
themselves in defending the rights of our Citizens. That is what
Tribunus Astur has done, not for a single individual, but for all
Citizens of Nova Roma. I do believe that he acted correctly under
current Nova Roma law, for the very reasons pointed out by Praetor
Galerius. All interpretations to the side, I support his effort
because it does serve the purpose of defending the rights of all of
our Citizens.

Vale optime
M Moravius Piscinus
Tribunus Plebis


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> --- ok!
>
> So, the Tribunes may pronounce intercessio at any time.....because
> the constitution is where they get their powers to pronounce
> intercessio...(because the Lex Labiena's 72 hours can't be used to
> influence the Senatus Consultum on internal procedures, which
would
> be a Senate call. this is in the constitution also).Never mind the
> subordinate legislations pursuant to the constitution...they would
> just prolong a needless, complicated discussion.
>
> I'll try not to ask to many questions in the future :)
>
> Pompeia
>
>
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tiberius Galerius Paulinus"
> <spqr753@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Consul Pompeia Minucia Tiberia
> >
> > I had suggested that we keep this debate for later but as it
seems
> > to be enjoined I will add my further comments.
> >
> > First I was not wrong when I stated that the Tribunes have 72
> hours
> > to veto an action that they are allowed to veto. Intercessio as
> the
> > good Tribune has pointed out is a grant of power from the
> > constitution.
> >
> > The Constitution states that a Praetor can call a Senate meeting
> in
> > the absence of both Consul. Can the Senate adopt internal rules
to
> > say otherwise?
> >
> > NO it can not because the power to call the Senate by
> > a Praetor or Tribune is granted by the constitution, the
highest
> > organ of the state.
> >
> > Same with the power to issue an Intercessio it is a power
granted
> to
> > the Tribunes and NO Senatus consultus can change that fact. When
> and
> > only when a Senatus consultum ultimum is in effect do the
> Tribunes,
> > like all other magistrate lose the ability to act.
> >
> > A Senatus consultus establishing the internal rules or
procedures
> of
> > the Senate does just that and nothing more. It can not at the
same
> > time limit the power or authority of other magistrates or
> Tribunes.
> >
> > The Constitutions states among other things that:
> >
> > "A Nota against a member of the Senate is sufficient to remove
> that
> > individual from the Senate until such time as it is removed."
> >
> > Can the Senate adopt an internal rule that states that when the
> > Senate is in session Nota's can not be issued?
> >
> > The constitution states that the Tribunes are "To be privy to
the
> > debates of the SenateÂ…" Can the Senate adopt an internal rule
that
> > states but only on the third Tuesday of the month?
> >
> > Can the Senate adopt an internal rules that states that when the
> > Senate is in session Curule Aediles who hold Imperium by
> > constitutional grant can only exercise it in those months
spelled
> > without an "R"?
> >
> > Of course it can't
> >
> > I am sorry Consul but it is you not I who is wrong on this issue.
> >
> >
> > Vale
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > Praetor
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44148 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
Salve Diana, et salvete quirites,

Diana Aventina <diana@...> writes:

> Since there is going to be a trial, someone needs to represent Appius
> Claudius.

This is correct. I'd offer myself but I've already been asked to serve as a
iudex for this trial.

Valete,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44149 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: The Intercessio Debate
In a message dated 6/5/2006 4:22:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
mhoratius@... writes:
A problem of interpretation arises in regard to a senatus consultum
ultimum because the Constitution says, "When in effect."
After the Senate votes, it goes into effect. So, Marcus Horatius you would
have 72 hours from the announcement of the meeting to discuss the enacting the
SCU, to veto it. This is a stopgap measure to protect the State. To await an
additional 72 hours to review it would be counter productive.

Q. Fabius Maximus
(Since this has nothing to do with Macronational procedure I'll use my Roman
name)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44150 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: The Intercessio Debate
---
Salve Marcus Moravius Piscinus Tribunis Plebis et Salvete Omnes:

I appreciate your taking time to expand on these elements from a
Tribune's perspective. You were the only Tribune to respond to my
questions, and the only person to acknowledge possibilities in
interpretive differences.

Valete
Pompeia Minucia Strabo
Consul
In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Consul Pompeia Minucia
>
> The senatus consultus to which you refer concerns how the Senate
> conducts itself. The Tribuni Plebis are not technically members
of
> the Senate in the exercise of their powers, and a senatus
consultus
> cannot on its own limit the powers of the Tribuni Plebis. Leges
can
> define how the Tribuni Plebis may exercise what powers the
> Constitution grants the Tribuni Plebis. Whenever there is a
> conflict between the various levels of our laws, then those laws
> stipulated as having a higher authority would take precedence.
> Normally we Tribuni Plebis do defer to the Senate's internal
rules.
> Any normal senatus consultus could be vetoed once it is issued,
and
> of course the Lex Labiena would apply. In practice there would
not
> be a conflict, since the Senate's rules on its internal procedures
> would not ordinarily limit the constitutional powers of the
Tribuni
> Plebis, or conflict with the leges that outline how those powers
are
> to be applied.
>
> A problem of interpretation arises in regard to a senatus
consultum
> ultimum because the Constitution says, "When in effect." Go back
to
> my earlier discussion with Praetor Octavius Pius. Does an SCU go
> into effect immediately when the Consules announce the decision of
> the Senate, or would an SCU go into effect only after the Tribuni
> Plebis have an opportunity to review and consider exercising an
> intercessio? With the Praetor I took the position that an SCU
would
> not go into effect until after 72 had passed from its
announcement,
> as this allows for the Tribuni Plebis to retain their rights and
> powers without conflicting with the wording of the Constitution -
> "when in effect." But of course others will not agree with my
> position.
>
> A call of the Senate to meet generally includes a schedule that
> gives when a contio ends and voting is to begin. I have suggested
> that these two steps constitute two different actions, and thus
that
> the Tribuni could intercede when voting began. But of course
that,
> too, is only one interpretation and I am sure that others would
> argue against it. If we interpret the law to mean that the
Tribuni
> Plebis may only veto within the first 24 hours of the call for the
> Senate to meet, that they cannot veto afterwards, then we end up
> putting the Tribuni Plebis in a position to squelch Senate debate
> when it comes to considering an SCU. Or else we remove the
potestes
> tribunicia from applying to SCU's at all. I do not think that
this
> would serve the interests of Nova Roma to eliminate there being
any
> check on the Senate's authority to issue an SCU, and it certainly
> would not benefit Nova Roma if, in practice, it should become a
> matter of cutting off the Senate's debate on whether or not to
issue
> an SCU. Also I believe that such an interpretation would be
> contrary to the intent of our body of law.
>
> Currently Nova Roma law places the Tribuni Plebis in an awkwardly
> ahistorical position as guardians of the Constitution, where their
> historical role concerned more the protection of individual
Citizens
> and their rights under the law. It is even more awkward here in
> that the Tribuni Plebis are not corporate officers and yet are
given
> powers that can intefer with the corporate duties of our higher
> magistrates and the Senate. The Senate, being our Board of
> Directors, and the higher magistrates, when acting as corporate
> officers, really should not be placed under potential restrictions
> imposed by non-corporate officers. Really, in a corporate sense,
we
> might do better to think of the Tribuni Plebis as omsbundmen that
> are intended to assist members, and therefore should reconsider
when
> and how they are to exercise authority inside Nova Roma. Also
> ahistorical is how the Constitution, in how it is written, places
> the Tribuni Plebis in lower authority to Aediles, including the
> Aediles Plebis, and below Quaestores, yet gives them powers that
> exceeds, in a sense, those that they held historically.
> Historically they were more on a par with the Paetores in
authority,
> and of course they did not hold their authority collegeally as
Nova
> Roma places them in practice.
>
> So there are quite a few issues regarding the role and position of
> Tribuni in Nova Roma that may need to be addressed in the future.
> But in this particular matter, with regard to the Senate's
authority
> to issue an SCU, as ahistorical as that authority is, then a
correct
> role, an historical role, is for the Tribuni Plebis to concern
> themselves in defending the rights of our Citizens. That is what
> Tribunus Astur has done, not for a single individual, but for all
> Citizens of Nova Roma. I do believe that he acted correctly under
> current Nova Roma law, for the very reasons pointed out by Praetor
> Galerius. All interpretations to the side, I support his effort
> because it does serve the purpose of defending the rights of all
of
> our Citizens.
>
> Vale optime
> M Moravius Piscinus
> Tribunus Plebis
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
> <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@> wrote:
> >
> > --- ok!
> >
> > So, the Tribunes may pronounce intercessio at any
time.....because
> > the constitution is where they get their powers to pronounce
> > intercessio...(because the Lex Labiena's 72 hours can't be used
to
> > influence the Senatus Consultum on internal procedures, which
> would
> > be a Senate call. this is in the constitution also).Never mind
the
> > subordinate legislations pursuant to the constitution...they
would
> > just prolong a needless, complicated discussion.
> >
> > I'll try not to ask to many questions in the future :)
> >
> > Pompeia
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tiberius Galerius Paulinus"
> > <spqr753@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve Consul Pompeia Minucia Tiberia
> > >
> > > I had suggested that we keep this debate for later but as it
> seems
> > > to be enjoined I will add my further comments.
> > >
> > > First I was not wrong when I stated that the Tribunes have 72
> > hours
> > > to veto an action that they are allowed to veto. Intercessio
as
> > the
> > > good Tribune has pointed out is a grant of power from the
> > > constitution.
> > >
> > > The Constitution states that a Praetor can call a Senate
meeting
> > in
> > > the absence of both Consul. Can the Senate adopt internal
rules
> to
> > > say otherwise?
> > >
> > > NO it can not because the power to call the Senate by
> > > a Praetor or Tribune is granted by the constitution, the
> highest
> > > organ of the state.
> > >
> > > Same with the power to issue an Intercessio it is a power
> granted
> > to
> > > the Tribunes and NO Senatus consultus can change that fact.
When
> > and
> > > only when a Senatus consultum ultimum is in effect do the
> > Tribunes,
> > > like all other magistrate lose the ability to act.
> > >
> > > A Senatus consultus establishing the internal rules or
> procedures
> > of
> > > the Senate does just that and nothing more. It can not at the
> same
> > > time limit the power or authority of other magistrates or
> > Tribunes.
> > >
> > > The Constitutions states among other things that:
> > >
> > > "A Nota against a member of the Senate is sufficient to remove
> > that
> > > individual from the Senate until such time as it is removed."
> > >
> > > Can the Senate adopt an internal rule that states that when
the
> > > Senate is in session Nota's can not be issued?
> > >
> > > The constitution states that the Tribunes are "To be privy to
> the
> > > debates of the SenateÂ…" Can the Senate adopt an internal rule
> that
> > > states but only on the third Tuesday of the month?
> > >
> > > Can the Senate adopt an internal rules that states that when
the
> > > Senate is in session Curule Aediles who hold Imperium by
> > > constitutional grant can only exercise it in those months
> spelled
> > > without an "R"?
> > >
> > > Of course it can't
> > >
> > > I am sorry Consul but it is you not I who is wrong on this
issue.
> > >
> > >
> > > Vale
> > >
> > > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > > Praetor
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44151 From: Aulus Sempronius Regulus Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Help Please, Philosophy and Virtue Lists?
Salvete,

Besides preparing posts on Mithraism in its Anatolian
context on a new list, I'm preparing posts on ancient
philosophy (philosophia) as a spiritual
discipline/path on the Nova Roma Philosophy and
Virtues list. Apparently, 2 of them are bouncing posts
back: the virtue and philosophy.

Valete,

A. Sempronius Regulus

Trahimur omnes laudis studio.
Tamdiu discendum est, quamdiu vivas.


Vincit qui se vincit. - Seneca
Astra inclinant, non necessitant. - Albinus
Aequam memento rebus in arduis servare mentem. - Horace

MMDCCLIX Anno urbis conditae (AUC)




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44152 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
Salvete omnes,

Priscus has asked for an advocate and I cannot see this trial
getting going quickly without one. I see the iudex list and much of
the cream of thr crop with regards to great constitutional knowledge
and debating skills on legal matters has been chosen. If I were up
to 100% in that department I would certainly volunteer to defend
Priscus but like any defendent I feel he must be given a fighting
chance. Even fast crash courses would not get me up to speed at this
point.

If I were in his situation as of now, there "is" one person I would
want to defend me. I am going to contact the citizen and see what
transpires.


Regards,

QSP







--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "CN•EQVIT•MARINVS \(Gnaeus
Equitius Marinus\)" <gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Diana, et salvete quirites,
>
> Diana Aventina <diana@...> writes:
>
> > Since there is going to be a trial, someone needs to represent
Appius
> > Claudius.
>
> This is correct. I'd offer myself but I've already been asked to
serve as a
> iudex for this trial.
>
> Valete,
>
> CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44153 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
---
Salve Q. Suetonius Paulinus Tribunis Plebis et Salvete Omnes:

According to message 44136 to M. Hortensia Maior he is requesting a
male Jew to defend him...so hopefully the citizen you have in mind
fits this criteria.
Perhaps if he wasn't quite so picky about the macronational ancestry
of his advocatus, he might not find himself in such a constricting
predicament

Just a thought........

Valete
Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Priscus has asked for an advocate and I cannot see this trial
> getting going quickly without one. I see the iudex list and much
of
> the cream of thr crop with regards to great constitutional
knowledge
> and debating skills on legal matters has been chosen. If I were up
> to 100% in that department I would certainly volunteer to defend
> Priscus but like any defendent I feel he must be given a fighting
> chance. Even fast crash courses would not get me up to speed at
this
> point.
>
> If I were in his situation as of now, there "is" one person I
would
> want to defend me. I am going to contact the citizen and see what
> transpires.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> QSP
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "CN•EQVIT•MARINVS \(Gnaeus
> Equitius Marinus\)" <gawne@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Diana, et salvete quirites,
> >
> > Diana Aventina <diana@> writes:
> >
> > > Since there is going to be a trial, someone needs to represent
> Appius
> > > Claudius.
> >
> > This is correct. I'd offer myself but I've already been asked
to
> serve as a
> > iudex for this trial.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44154 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
M. Hortensia P.Strabonis Q. Suetonio spd;
Salve Consul, well so far I seem to be the only active
Jewish civis in Nova Roma, though unfortunately female;-

Actually Paulinus is making an unwarranted assumption;
Appius Claudius Priscus is not an ignorant and clueless fool who is
unable to conduct his own defense without Cordus.

He is a professional and highly educated man and a fellow alumnus.
He certainly is able to represent himself before the Iudices as well
as understand Nova Roman law.
I posted over at Latinitas a while ago a strong position on free
speech, even for that which may be personally offensive; eg; neo
nazis parading in Illinois or any other place they desire.
Priscus is in no danger of being railroaded. He is erudite and
educated enough to represent himself and his views to the Iudices.
Valete
M. Hortensia Maior, aedilis plebis



> Salve Q. Suetonius Paulinus Tribunis Plebis et Salvete Omnes:
>
> According to message 44136 to M. Hortensia Maior he is requesting
a
> male Jew to defend him...so hopefully the citizen you have in mind
> fits this criteria.
> Perhaps if he wasn't quite so picky about the macronational
ancestry
> of his advocatus, he might not find himself in such a constricting
> predicament
>
> Just a thought........
>
> Valete
> Pompeia
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
(Michael
> Kelly)" <mjk@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > Priscus has asked for an advocate and I cannot see this trial
> > getting going quickly without one. I see the iudex list and much
> of
> > the cream of thr crop with regards to great constitutional
> knowledge
> > and debating skills on legal matters has been chosen. If I were
up
> > to 100% in that department I would certainly volunteer to defend
> > Priscus but like any defendent I feel he must be given a
fighting
> > chance. Even fast crash courses would not get me up to speed at
> this
> > point.
> >
> > If I were in his situation as of now, there "is" one person I
> would
> > want to defend me. I am going to contact the citizen and see
what
> > transpires.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > QSP
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "CN•EQVIT•MARINVS \(Gnaeus
> > Equitius Marinus\)" <gawne@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve Diana, et salvete quirites,
> > >
> > > Diana Aventina <diana@> writes:
> > >
> > > > Since there is going to be a trial, someone needs to
represent
> > Appius
> > > > Claudius.
> > >
> > > This is correct. I'd offer myself but I've already been asked
> to
> > serve as a
> > > iudex for this trial.
> > >
> > > Valete,
> > >
> > > CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44155 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
Salve Consul Pompeia,

Well I was one of the 70% or so of babyboomers that was circumsized.
That's would have been a start in the right direction but alas my
legal skills need a lot of brushing up to qualify. I'm sure he'll
give the person great consideration when contacted. L. Felix Sulla
would have fitted his criteria but we haven't heard from him for
quite a spell.

Regards,

QSP



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> ---
> Salve Q. Suetonius Paulinus Tribunis Plebis et Salvete Omnes:
>
> According to message 44136 to M. Hortensia Maior he is requesting
a
> male Jew to defend him...so hopefully the citizen you have in mind
> fits this criteria.
> Perhaps if he wasn't quite so picky about the macronational
ancestry
> of his advocatus, he might not find himself in such a constricting
> predicament
>
> Just a thought........
>
> Valete
> Pompeia
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
(Michael
> Kelly)" <mjk@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > Priscus has asked for an advocate and I cannot see this trial
> > getting going quickly without one. I see the iudex list and much
> of
> > the cream of thr crop with regards to great constitutional
> knowledge
> > and debating skills on legal matters has been chosen. If I were
up
> > to 100% in that department I would certainly volunteer to defend
> > Priscus but like any defendent I feel he must be given a
fighting
> > chance. Even fast crash courses would not get me up to speed at
> this
> > point.
> >
> > If I were in his situation as of now, there "is" one person I
> would
> > want to defend me. I am going to contact the citizen and see
what
> > transpires.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > QSP
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "CN•EQVIT•MARINVS \(Gnaeus
> > Equitius Marinus\)" <gawne@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve Diana, et salvete quirites,
> > >
> > > Diana Aventina <diana@> writes:
> > >
> > > > Since there is going to be a trial, someone needs to
represent
> > Appius
> > > > Claudius.
> > >
> > > This is correct. I'd offer myself but I've already been asked
> to
> > serve as a
> > > iudex for this trial.
> > >
> > > Valete,
> > >
> > > CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44156 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Help Please, Philosophy and Virtue Lists?
> A. Tullia Scholastica A. Sempronio Regulo quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
> Salvete,
>
> Besides preparing posts on Mithraism in its Anatolian
> context on a new list, I'm preparing posts on ancient
> philosophy (philosophia) as a spiritual
> discipline/path on the Nova Roma Philosophy and
> Virtues list. Apparently, 2 of them are bouncing posts
> back: the virtue and philosophy.
>
> ATS: The Virtues list has a new moderator who has a limited mailbox; if
> you had been removed from moderation in the past, you should, however, be able
> to post there. Prior to the appointment of the new moderator, there were
> several complaints about posts not being approved within the required
> fortnight. Periodically Yahoo has problems, and loses the mail, but if it¹s
> being bounced, the chances are that the moderator¹s mailbox is full or that
> something more serious is wrong with Yahoo. Perhaps someone else could speak
> about the Philosophy list (which I didn¹t know existed).
>
> Valete,
>
> A. Sempronius Regulus
>
> Trahimur omnes laudis studio.
> Tamdiu discendum est, quamdiu vivas.
>
>
> Vincit qui se vincit. - Seneca
> Astra inclinant, non necessitant. - Albinus
> Aequam memento rebus in arduis servare mentem. - Horace
>
> MMDCCLIX Anno urbis conditae (AUC)
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44157 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
Salve Marca Hortensia,

Sorry, you posted the same time I did.

No, you don't go far in math like he did by being stupid. I sure
wish I had his mathematical abilities. However I go by the well
known court saying that anyone (even lawyers) who defend themselves
have a fool for a client. He did ask for an advocate first thing.

As for Nazis in the past, many brownshirts were a bunch of louts and
idiots but most of the 3rd Reich leadership had university or post
graduate degrees save Hitler and Streicher.

Anyway I do realize that these people are often underestimated and a
force to be reckoned with. Thanks for your input!

Regards,

QSP



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia P.Strabonis Q. Suetonio spd;
> Salve Consul, well so far I seem to be the only active
> Jewish civis in Nova Roma, though unfortunately female;-
>
> Actually Paulinus is making an unwarranted assumption;
> Appius Claudius Priscus is not an ignorant and clueless fool who
is
> unable to conduct his own defense without Cordus.
>
> He is a professional and highly educated man and a fellow alumnus.
> He certainly is able to represent himself before the Iudices as
well
> as understand Nova Roman law.
> I posted over at Latinitas a while ago a strong position on
free
> speech, even for that which may be personally offensive; eg; neo
> nazis parading in Illinois or any other place they desire.
> Priscus is in no danger of being railroaded. He is erudite and
> educated enough to represent himself and his views to the Iudices.
> Valete
> M. Hortensia Maior, aedilis plebis
>
>
>
> > Salve Q. Suetonius Paulinus Tribunis Plebis et Salvete Omnes:
> >
> > According to message 44136 to M. Hortensia Maior he is
requesting
> a
> > male Jew to defend him...so hopefully the citizen you have in
mind
> > fits this criteria.
> > Perhaps if he wasn't quite so picky about the macronational
> ancestry
> > of his advocatus, he might not find himself in such a
constricting
> > predicament
> >
> > Just a thought........
> >
> > Valete
> > Pompeia
> >
> >
> > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
> (Michael
> > Kelly)" <mjk@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete omnes,
> > >
> > > Priscus has asked for an advocate and I cannot see this trial
> > > getting going quickly without one. I see the iudex list and
much
> > of
> > > the cream of thr crop with regards to great constitutional
> > knowledge
> > > and debating skills on legal matters has been chosen. If I
were
> up
> > > to 100% in that department I would certainly volunteer to
defend
> > > Priscus but like any defendent I feel he must be given a
> fighting
> > > chance. Even fast crash courses would not get me up to speed
at
> > this
> > > point.
> > >
> > > If I were in his situation as of now, there "is" one person I
> > would
> > > want to defend me. I am going to contact the citizen and see
> what
> > > transpires.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > QSP
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "CN•EQVIT•MARINVS \(Gnaeus
> > > Equitius Marinus\)" <gawne@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salve Diana, et salvete quirites,
> > > >
> > > > Diana Aventina <diana@> writes:
> > > >
> > > > > Since there is going to be a trial, someone needs to
> represent
> > > Appius
> > > > > Claudius.
> > > >
> > > > This is correct. I'd offer myself but I've already been
asked
> > to
> > > serve as a
> > > > iudex for this trial.
> > > >
> > > > Valete,
> > > >
> > > > CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44158 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: English to Latin?
> A. Tullia Scholastica A. Tullio Severo quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae
> voluntatis S.P.D.
>
> I wrote:
>>> >> A. Tullius Severus
>>> >>
>>> >> ...who, as it happens, has never met
>>> >> and is not [in the real world] related
>>> >> to A. Tullia Scholastica %^)
>
> To which Scholastica graciously replied, in part:
>>> >>
>>> >> not sure of the meaning of that emotikon thingie...
>
> Tilt your head to the left...it's a grin.
>
>>> >> We are, however, in the same academic field
>
> Actually, I'm flattered, but that's not the case. I'm
> a pharmacist in Rhode Island, and a (primarily medieval)
> re-enactor who counts among his hobbies the translating
> of Latin texts (mostly medieval ceremonials, manorial court records,
> and the odd Elizabethan board-game treatise).
>
>>> >> most of whose members, along with
>>> >> many others, are in the sodalitas Latinitatis.
>
> Which I have to get around to joining....
>
> A. Tullia: We don¹t often discuss matters medieval, other than that of
> Latin pronunciation, but you are certainly welcome to join us. We have two
> world class Latinists, one of whom is often quite active on the list, and a
> number of very fine Latinists there. Said Latinist is writing a book in Latin
> about the development of Latin vocabulary, so I¹m sure he could discuss
> medieval Latin with you. There are also others who are interested in late
> Latin; they might speak up more often if they had another friend. I¹m sure
> many of us would find your particular expertise quite interesting.
>
> We also welcome other reenactors at several of our reenactment events; the
> two primary ones in New England are somewhat iffy this year (one was
> definitely cancelled), but there may be another one in Massachusetts in the
> Fall. I might possibly be able to make that one...
>
> Thanks again for your reply.
>
> A. Tullia: Flocci est.
>
> A. Tullius Severus
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44159 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-05
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
M.Hortensia Q.Suetonio spd;
actually in this case, Pauline, Cornelius Sulla probably
would not be a good choice. I bet you he would be vehemently against
Priscus, as the vast majority of Christians are disgusted by anti-
semitism.
Though born Jewish, Cornelius Sulla was raised Christian and
only returned to Judaism in college. He never really had the
experience of being a religious minority and valuing rights even
when it comes to difficult subjects.
Priscus is fortunate that I am a iudex in his case; I'm
indifferent to his views; I only care if he violated the Nova Roman
laws he is accused of.
bene vale
Marca Hortensia Maior

> Salve Marca Hortensia,
>
> Sorry, you posted the same time I did.
>
> No, you don't go far in math like he did by being stupid. I sure
> wish I had his mathematical abilities. However I go by the well
> known court saying that anyone (even lawyers) who defend
themselves
> have a fool for a client. He did ask for an advocate first thing.
>
> As for Nazis in the past, many brownshirts were a bunch of louts
and
> idiots but most of the 3rd Reich leadership had university or post
> graduate degrees save Hitler and Streicher.
>
> Anyway I do realize that these people are often underestimated and
a
> force to be reckoned with. Thanks for your input!
>
> Regards,
>
> QSP
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > M. Hortensia P.Strabonis Q. Suetonio spd;
> > Salve Consul, well so far I seem to be the only active
> > Jewish civis in Nova Roma, though unfortunately female;-
> >
> > Actually Paulinus is making an unwarranted assumption;
> > Appius Claudius Priscus is not an ignorant and clueless fool
who
> is
> > unable to conduct his own defense without Cordus.
> >
> > He is a professional and highly educated man and a fellow
alumnus.
> > He certainly is able to represent himself before the Iudices as
> well
> > as understand Nova Roman law.
> > I posted over at Latinitas a while ago a strong position on
> free
> > speech, even for that which may be personally offensive; eg; neo
> > nazis parading in Illinois or any other place they desire.
> > Priscus is in no danger of being railroaded. He is erudite and
> > educated enough to represent himself and his views to the
Iudices.
> > Valete
> > M. Hortensia Maior, aedilis plebis
> >
> >
> >
> > > Salve Q. Suetonius Paulinus Tribunis Plebis et Salvete Omnes:
> > >
> > > According to message 44136 to M. Hortensia Maior he is
> requesting
> > a
> > > male Jew to defend him...so hopefully the citizen you have in
> mind
> > > fits this criteria.
> > > Perhaps if he wasn't quite so picky about the macronational
> > ancestry
> > > of his advocatus, he might not find himself in such a
> constricting
> > > predicament
> > >
> > > Just a thought........
> > >
> > > Valete
> > > Pompeia
> > >
> > >
> > > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
> > (Michael
> > > Kelly)" <mjk@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salvete omnes,
> > > >
> > > > Priscus has asked for an advocate and I cannot see this
trial
> > > > getting going quickly without one. I see the iudex list and
> much
> > > of
> > > > the cream of thr crop with regards to great constitutional
> > > knowledge
> > > > and debating skills on legal matters has been chosen. If I
> were
> > up
> > > > to 100% in that department I would certainly volunteer to
> defend
> > > > Priscus but like any defendent I feel he must be given a
> > fighting
> > > > chance. Even fast crash courses would not get me up to speed
> at
> > > this
> > > > point.
> > > >
> > > > If I were in his situation as of now, there "is" one person
I
> > > would
> > > > want to defend me. I am going to contact the citizen and see
> > what
> > > > transpires.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > QSP
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "CN•EQVIT•MARINVS \(Gnaeus
> > > > Equitius Marinus\)" <gawne@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Salve Diana, et salvete quirites,
> > > > >
> > > > > Diana Aventina <diana@> writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Since there is going to be a trial, someone needs to
> > represent
> > > > Appius
> > > > > > Claudius.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is correct. I'd offer myself but I've already been
> asked
> > > to
> > > > serve as a
> > > > > iudex for this trial.
> > > > >
> > > > > Valete,
> > > > >
> > > > > CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44160 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: The Intercessio Debate
Salve Consularis Maximus

Yes, I agree that it would be counter productive. The nature of
some matter that would require an SCU would be one that needed swift
action. But I do not think that the call for the Senate to
assemble, in that 24 hour period before a presiding magistrate has
even presented what shall be discussed, is the proper time for the
Tribuni Plebis to intervene. This is what Consul Minucia poses, and
what the current SC on Senate procedures poses, that the Tribuni
Plebis would be limited to vetoing some measure before they even
knew what it was.

The Senate should be allowed to debate, and I see no good reason to
allow the Tribuni to interfer with the Senate from debating. IMO the
time to allow an intercessio would be when the Senate is called to
vote. Senate procedures say that a presiding magistrate is to call
for a vote at the conclusion of Senate debate, so that this is a
separate action, and I would say it is therefore susceptible to a
Trinunician intercessio. As you know, the minimum time alloted for
debate is 96 hours, where only 48 hours need be given for a vote.
That limits a Tribunus from the full 72 hours, but in practical
terms, with a Tribunus having followed the Senate debate, the 48
hour voting period is adequate time to decide whether an intercessio
should be issued. Voting would be temporarily halted as the other
Tribuni Plebis offered their opinions, and if the majority did not
concur in the intercessio, voting could continue.

As I said earlier, the only time this becomes a real problem is with
an SCU since the Tribuni Plebis could not issue an intercessio once
it went into effect. And the reason why we would need to keep some
check on the Senate from issuing an SCU would be where a simple
majority of the Senate might wrongfully try to use such a power
against a minority part of the Senate, or against a group of
Citizens, or against an individual Citizen where it would be
unwarranted. And think about it, if part of the Senate would turn on
another part, would they give warning of their intention to issue an
SCU. There would be no lawful way to prevent them if you take away
the Tribuni Plebis authority to intervene once the process had
begun.

In the current case, concerning Appius Priscus, I was informed
earlier, and I told the other Tribuni Plebis that I would not
initiate an intercessio, but would instead defer to the judgement of
the Senate as to whether the matter was serious enough to warrant an
SCU. I believe that there can be such instances where the security
of Nova Roma may preclude the rights of its Citizens. I have my
doubts as to whether this particular matter poses such a threat, but
I was willing to let the Senate decide on the matter. Tribunus
Astur thought that the rights of a Citizen did outweigh the danger
posed to Nova Roma in this instance, and thus offered his auxilium
to Appius Priscus by issuing an intercessio. If Consul Modianus had
not withdrawn his measure from Senate consideration, we would have
ended up in this debate anyway, leaving in confusion whether the
SCU, assuming it had passed, could be legally implimented. That
would have led to another needless disruption, with some resolution
attempted after the fact, where now we can calmly discuss this
question on procedures. IMHO the Senate should now consider changing
the wording of the senatus consultum on Senate procedures, but that
is for the Senate to decide.

Vale
M Moravius Piscinus
Tribunus Plebis



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 6/5/2006 4:22:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> mhoratius@... writes:
> A problem of interpretation arises in regard to a senatus
consultum
> ultimum because the Constitution says, "When in effect."
> After the Senate votes, it goes into effect. So, Marcus Horatius
you would
> have 72 hours from the announcement of the meeting to discuss the
enacting the
> SCU, to veto it. This is a stopgap measure to protect the State.
To await an
> additional 72 hours to review it would be counter productive.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
> (Since this has nothing to do with Macronational procedure I'll
use my Roman
> name)
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44161 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
In a message dated 6/5/2006 6:43:11 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
rory12001@... writes:
Appius Claudius Priscus is not an ignorant and clueless fool who is
unable to conduct his own defense without Cordus.

He is a professional and highly educated man and a fellow alumnus.
He certainly is able to represent himself before the Iudices as well
as understand Nova Roman law.
And he does understand Roman law. Several references he made in his speeches
make that self evident. Apollonius would make a fine advocate except isn't
he out of his country?

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44162 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
In a message dated 6/5/2006 6:52:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
mjk@... writes:
L. Felix Sulla
Actually Cornelius would want nothing to do with him.

Q Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44163 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: Someone needs to represent Appius Claudius Priscus
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
(Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Consul Pompeia,
>
> Well I was one of the 70% or so of babyboomers that was
circumsized.

"TMI" Tribune....too much information....

> That's would have been a start in the right direction but alas my
> legal skills need a lot of brushing up to qualify. I'm sure he'll
> give the person great consideration when contacted. L. Felix Sulla
> would have fitted his criteria but we haven't heard from him for
> quite a spell.
>
> Regards,
>
> QSP
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
> <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@> wrote:
> >
> > ---
> > Salve Q. Suetonius Paulinus Tribunis Plebis et Salvete Omnes:
> >
> > According to message 44136 to M. Hortensia Maior he is
requesting
> a
> > male Jew to defend him...so hopefully the citizen you have in
mind
> > fits this criteria.
> > Perhaps if he wasn't quite so picky about the macronational
> ancestry
> > of his advocatus, he might not find himself in such a
constricting
> > predicament
> >
> > Just a thought........
> >
> > Valete
> > Pompeia
> >
> >
> > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
> (Michael
> > Kelly)" <mjk@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete omnes,
> > >
> > > Priscus has asked for an advocate and I cannot see this trial
> > > getting going quickly without one. I see the iudex list and
much
> > of
> > > the cream of thr crop with regards to great constitutional
> > knowledge
> > > and debating skills on legal matters has been chosen. If I
were
> up
> > > to 100% in that department I would certainly volunteer to
defend
> > > Priscus but like any defendent I feel he must be given a
> fighting
> > > chance. Even fast crash courses would not get me up to speed
at
> > this
> > > point.
> > >
> > > If I were in his situation as of now, there "is" one person I
> > would
> > > want to defend me. I am going to contact the citizen and see
> what
> > > transpires.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > QSP
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "CN•EQVIT•MARINVS \(Gnaeus
> > > Equitius Marinus\)" <gawne@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salve Diana, et salvete quirites,
> > > >
> > > > Diana Aventina <diana@> writes:
> > > >
> > > > > Since there is going to be a trial, someone needs to
> represent
> > > Appius
> > > > > Claudius.
> > > >
> > > > This is correct. I'd offer myself but I've already been
asked
> > to
> > > serve as a
> > > > iudex for this trial.
> > > >
> > > > Valete,
> > > >
> > > > CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44164 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: a.d VIII Id. Iun.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem VIII Idus Iunius; haec dies nefastus est.

"I have a daughter (may she outlive me, I pray)
In whom I'll always be happy, while she's safe.
When I wished to give her away to my son-in-law,
I asked which times were fit for weddings, which were not:
Then it was pointed out to me that after the Ides of June
Was a good time for brides, and for bridegrooms,
While the start of the month was unsuitable for marriage:
For the holy wife of the Flamen Dialis told me:
`Till the calm Tiber carries the sweepings from the shrine
Of Ilian Vesta, on its yellow waves to the sea,
I'm not allowed to comb my hair with a toothed comb,
Nor to cut my nails with anything made of iron,
Nor to touch my husband, though he's Jove's priest,
And though he was given to me by law for life.
Don't be in a hurry. Your daughter will be better wed,
When Vesta's fire gleams on purified earth.'" - Ovid, Fasti VI

"Why did the priest of Jupiter (Flamen Dialis) resign his office if
his wife died, as Ateius has recorded?

Is it because the man who has taken a wife and then lost her is more
unfortunate than one who has never taken a wife? For the house of the
married man is complete, but the house of him who has married and
later lost his wife is not only incomplete, but also crippled.
Or is it because the wife assists her husband in the rites, so that
many of them cannot be performed without the wife's presence, and for
a man who has lost his wife to marry again immediately is neither
possible perhaps nor otherwise seemly? Wherefore it was formerly
illegal for the flamen to divorce his wife; and it is still, as it
seems, illegal, but in my day Domitian once permitted it on petition.
The priests were present at that ceremony of divorce and performed
many horrible, strange, and gloomy rites. One might be less surprised
at this resignation of the flamen if one should adduce also the fact
that when one of the censors died, the other was obliged to resign his
office; but when the censor Livius Drusus died, his colleague Aemilius
Scaurus was unwilling to give up his office until certain tribunes
ordered him to be led away to prison." - Plutarch, "The Roman
Questions" 50

A great many ceremonies are imposed upon the Flamen Dialis, and also
many restraints, about which we read in the books "On The Public
Priesthoods" and also in Book I of Fabius Pictor's work. Among them
are the following: it is forbidden ("religio est") the Flamen Dialis
to ride a horse; it is likewise forbidden him to view the "classes
arrayed" outside the pomerium, i.e., armed and in battle order; hence
only rarely is the Flamen Dialis made a consul, since the conduct of
wars is entrusted to the consuls; it is likewise unlawful ("fas
numquam est") for him ever to take an oath by Iuppiter; it is likewise
unlawful for him to wear a ring, unless it is cut through and empty
(i.e., without a jewel). It is also unlawful to carry out fire from
the flaminia, i.e., the Flamen Dialis' dwelling, except for a sacral
purpose; if a prisoner in chains enters the house he must be released
and the chains must be carried up through the impluvium (the opening
in the roof above the atrium or living room) onto the roof tiles and
dropped down from there into the street. He must have no knot in his
head gear or in his girdle or in any other part of his attire. If
anyone is being led away to be flogged and falls at his feet as a
suppliant, it is unlawful ("piaculum est") to flog him that day. The
hair of the Flamen Dialis is not to be cut except by a freeman. It is
customary ("mos est") for the Flamen neither to touch nor even to name
a female goat, or eat or touch raw meat, ivy, or beans.

He must not walk under a trellis for vines. The feet of the bed on
which he lies must have a thin coating of clay, and he must not be
away from this bed for three successive nights, nor is it lawful for
anyone else to sleep in this bed. At the foot of his bed there must be
a box containing a little pile of sacrificial cakes. The nail
trimmings and hair of the Dialis must be buried in the ground beneath
a healthy tree. Every day is a holy day for the Dialis. He must not go
outdoors ("sub divo") without a head-covering.

It is not lawful for him to touch bread made of fermented meal. His
underwear he does not take off except in covered places, lest he
appear nude under the open sky, which is the same as under the eye of
Iuppiter. No one else outranks him in the seating at a banquet except
the Rex sacrificulus. If he loses his wife, he must resign his office.
His marriage cannot be dissolved ("dirimi ius non est") except by
death. He never enters a burying ground, he never touches a corpse. He
is, however, permitted to attend a funeral.

Almost the same ceremonial rules belong to the Flaminica Dialis. They
say that she observes certain other and different ones, for example,
that she wears a dyed gown, and that she has a twig from a fruitful
tree tucked in her veil, and that it is forbidden [religiosum est] for
her to ascend more than three rungs of a ladder and even that when she
goes to the Argei, when twenty-four puppets were thrown into the
Tiber, she must neither comb her head nor arrange her hair.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Wikipedia, Frederick Grant, "Ancient Roman Religion" (New York 1957)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44165 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
EDICTVM CENSORIVM IN AP. CLAVDIVM PRISCVM

CENSORIAL EDICT AGAINST AP. CLAUDIUS PRISCUS


Nos Novae Romae censores hoc edictum de cive Ap. Claudio Prisco, qui
civitatem Novae Romae accepit a.d. XII Kal. Ian. MMDCCLVIII, proponunt.

Concerning citizen Appius Claudius Priscus, who joined Nova Roma on
21 December MMDCCLVIII, we the Censores of Nova Roma issue this edict.

Quia antequam civitatem Novae Romae accepit, civis Ap. Claudius Priscus
facta infra scripta peregerat suaseratque sententias quae contra
consilia publica et concordiam, ne dicamus vitam Novae Romae ipsam, in
periculum trahere videntur:

Whereas, the citizen Appius Claudius Priscus, before joining Nova
Roma, has performed the following actions and advocated positions
that are contrary to public policy and likely to endanger the harmony
or even the existence of Nova Roma:

-- Exhibuit emissionem radiophonicam de "potestate hominum cutis albae,"
auxilio et fortasse opibus societatis Partis Nationalis Socialistae
Opificum Germanorum

-- produced a "White Power" radio show, sponsored by an "NSDAP"
organisation;

-- Magistratum unius e statuum Americae petivit, ratione proposita in
qua suffragia de feminis tollenda, iura liberorum suorum custodiendorum
feminis neganda, et in carceribus homines e colore cutis segregandi.

-- run for statewide political office on a platform that advocated
the removal of voting rights for women, denying child custody rights
to women, and the segregation of prisons;

Praeterea, cum civitatem Novae Romae accepit, Holocaustum Iudaeorum
fuisse negavit una cum affirmatione Hitleri coniectionem Iudaeorum in
vincula "tam recte" factum esse quam illam Roosevelti de Americanis
quorum maiores e Iaponia migravere. Deinde nudius tertius se ad Officium
Rerum Externarum regiminis Civitatum Foederatarum Americae scripsisse
agnovit, ponens partem Iraquiae Novae Romae imperatrici dandam, quod
omnibus magistratibus nostris inscitis nec probantibus factum est.

and, that since becoming a citizen of Nova Roma, he has engaged in
Holocaust denial, while simultaneously claiming that Hitler's
internment of Jews was "as right" as the actions of Roosevelt
interning Japanese-Americans.

Furthermore, he has admitted last week that he wrote to the
United States Government's Department of State, proposing that Nova Roma be
given control of a portion of Iraq. This was done without the knowledge or
permission of any magistrate of Nova Roma.


Credimus veri simile esse Ap. Claudium Priscum nomine vero suo
cottidiano Regimini Civitatum Foederatarum Americae hominem probabiliter
periculosum notum esse. Scribendo ad Officium Rerum Externarum,
communitatem falsam inter se et Novam Romam finxit, quo nos periculo
indagationis obiecit.

We believe it likely that Appius Claudius Priscus, under his true
name, is known to the United States Government as a potentially
dangerous individual. By writing to the State Department, he has
created a false association between himself and Nova Roma, thereby
exposing us to investigation.

E paragrapho IV. A. 1. Constitutionis Novae Romae, censoribus potestas
officiumque est: "mores publicos honoremque per notas collegiales
proponendas sospites servant. In unum e multis, nota sat est ut ius
suffragiorum ferendorum amittat dum tollatur. "

According to the Constitution of Nova Roma, IV.A.1., the Censores
have the power and obligation:
"To safeguard the public morality and honor through the collegial
administering of /nota/; A nota against an ordinary individual is
sufficient to deprive that individual of the right to vote until such
time as it is removed;."

Ex hoc, nos Censores Ap. Claudium Priscum damnant, repudiant, notantque,
et in eum hanc notam edicunt, eum iure suffragiorum ferendorum in
suffragiis Novae Romae omnibus privantes. Haec nota per spatium munerum
nostrorum reliquum valebit, sed edicto censorum futurorum renovetur.

We, the Censores, do hereby condemn, repudiate, and censure Appius
Claudius Priscus, and issue this NOTA upon him, depriving him of the
right to vote in any Nova Roma election. This Nota shall remain in
effect for the remainder of our terms in office, but may be renewed
by edict of future Censores.

Gn. Equitius Marinus, Censor.
M. Octavius Germanicus Censor.
ante diem VIII Id. IVNIAS MMDCCLIX a.u.c.


--
hucke@... - http://www.graveyards.com

"A cactolith is a quasihorizontal chonolith composed of anastomosing
ductoliths whose distal ends curl like a harpolith, thin like a
sphenolith, or bulge discordantly like an akmolith or ethmolith."
(from _Geology and Geography of the Henry Mountains Region, Utah_)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44166 From: caiusmoraviusbrutus Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Talk on Religio Romana
Salvete Omnes!

My local Pagan Community in Dorset, England hold an annual gathering
at the beginning of June which lasts a few days, consisting of
various social and ritual activities. There are also a number of
talks and workshops. While the emphasis is generally on local Pagan
traditions (Witchcraft/Wicca/Celtic Reconstructionism/Shamanism and
so on) I was kindly given the opportunity to present a talk on the
Religio Romana this year. Obviously I did this in a personal and non-
official capacity. I spoke primarily on domestic religion but touched
on a few other areas before finishing with a brief ritual. Despite a
certain initial apprehension on the part of some of the Celts it all
went very well and unpleasant international incidents of any kind
were avoided. The talk itself was based on an article of my own
called "A Brief Introduction to Roman Paganism". I also prepared a
very simple "Beginners Guide to the Religio Romana" for the talk. If
anyone wishes to see these contact me directly and I'll send you a
copy. Both are available in Microsoft Word and are about four pages
long (A4).

Valete!

Caius Moravius Brutus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44167 From: David Carey Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: Talk on Religio Romana
Salve Brute,

I hope that you had a great weekend and so good to hear that you didn't start any wars! ;-D

I would love to see what you presented to the gathering.

Vale,

M. Aurelius Varus

caiusmoraviusbrutus <crwbanmor@...> wrote:
Salvete Omnes!

My local Pagan Community in Dorset, England hold an annual gathering
at the beginning of June which lasts a few days, consisting of
various social and ritual activities. There are also a number of
talks and workshops. While the emphasis is generally on local Pagan
traditions (Witchcraft/Wicca/Celtic Reconstructionism/Shamanism and
so on) I was kindly given the opportunity to present a talk on the
Religio Romana this year. Obviously I did this in a personal and non-
official capacity. I spoke primarily on domestic religion but touched
on a few other areas before finishing with a brief ritual. Despite a
certain initial apprehension on the part of some of the Celts it all
went very well and unpleasant international incidents of any kind
were avoided. The talk itself was based on an article of my own
called "A Brief Introduction to Roman Paganism". I also prepared a
very simple "Beginners Guide to the Religio Romana" for the talk. If
anyone wishes to see these contact me directly and I'll send you a
copy. Both are available in Microsoft Word and are about four pages
long (A4).

Valete!

Caius Moravius Brutus





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44168 From: dicconf Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Matt Hucke wrote:

> EDICTVM CENSORIVM IN AP. CLAVDIVM PRISCVM
>
> CENSORIAL EDICT AGAINST AP. CLAUDIUS PRISCUS

I confess I've been skipping most of this argument, but this startles me:

> -- Exhibuit emissionem radiophonicam de "potestate hominum cutis albae,"
> auxilio et fortasse opibus societatis Partis Nationalis Socialistae
> Opificum Germanorum
>
> -- produced a "White Power" radio show, sponsored by an "NSDAP"
> organisation;

The NSDAP -- Nazional-Socialische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei, the official
name of the Nazis -- was specifically a _German_ organization, as the name
tells us. Is this "NSDAP" that A. Claudius Priscus is associated with
some bizarre sort of historic recreationist group?

> "A cactolith is a quasihorizontal chonolith composed of anastomosing
> ductoliths whose distal ends curl like a harpolith, thin like a
> sphenolith, or bulge discordantly like an akmolith or ethmolith."
> (from _Geology and Geography of the Henry Mountains Region, Utah_)

Mehercle! I never knew that.

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Curiosity thrilled the cat
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44169 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
The US government is a pretty big thing. Whom did he contact in the US
government. There is a big difference between the Department of State
Undersecretary for Liberating Iraq, and his cousin who is a clerk in the
mail room of the Department of Agriculture satellite office in Iowa. Was
this a serious contact or not. Without details it is almost meaningless.
--
>|P. Dominus Antonius|<
Tony Dah m

Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius
Islam religio pacis, nex omnibus dissentint.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44170 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
A. Apollonius censoribus omnibusque sal.

A nota, once imposed, remains in effect until removed and does not expire upon the departure from office of the issuing censores.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44171 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
C. Equitius Cato censores Novae Romae sal.

Salvete censors.

Not to be a pain, but I find this troubling:

"Credimus veri simile esse Ap. Claudium Priscum nomine vero suo
cottidiano Regimini Civitatum Foederatarum Americae hominem probabiliter
periculosum notum esse.

We believe it likely that Appius Claudius Priscus, under his true
name, is known to the United States Government as a potentially
dangerous individual."

Is not his true name Appius Claudius Priscus? This suggests that in
some sense our Roman names are not "real".

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44172 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
C, Equitius Cato P. Domino Antonio quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Dominus Antonius, you bring up a good point, and one that can be
expanded upon.

The heart of this matter is not *what* Claudius Priscus believes; one
of the hallmarks of an enlightened, civilized society is the feedom of
its people to believe basically anything they want, and speak about
aything they want.

Racism, anti-Semitism, homophobia, misogyny --- I personally feel that
all are unsupportable societally and intellectually; but that does not
mean that an educated, literate person cannot believe in any one of
them (or all four). Claudius Priscus has the undeniable right to
believe in and speak to any of them. He has the right to act upon his
beliefs, just as a Christian has the right to worship a single God and
a practitioner of the religio has the right to worship all the Gods.
Claudius Priscus is not guilty simply because he believes something
(or some things) that many of us may find repugnant --- even if these
things are at odds with the stated goals and ideals of the Republic.
There are many citizens of many countries whose personal beliefs clash
with the policies and/or ideals of their government.

The heart of this matter *is* how his acting upon his beliefs might
affect or endanger the Republic's existence --- or indeed if it would
at all, and I believe that the trial being constructed under the
guidance of consul Modianus is going to decide that exact point.

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44173 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Salve Cato,

> Is not his true name Appius Claudius Priscus?

Only within Nova Roma. This nota has ramifications that go beyond Nova Roma.
It is our short term repudiation of this man.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44174 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
"P. Dominus Antonius" <marsvigilia@...> writes:

> Was this a serious contact or not.

It was a serious proposal. If you want to learn the details, join the mailing
list for the trial. The details will be presented in evidence there.

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44175 From: Claudio Guzzo Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: NR in Iraq?
Salve.
Appius Claudius Priscus
wrote:
<Salvete omnes! (omissis)

Consul Modianus has said that I am a "danger" because I have not
denied to him that I (am?/was?/know?) something called a "neo-Nazi".
Let him, or anyone, accuse me of something that is a capital crime,
and sign it. Let there be a trial with a judge, a jury, and a defense
lawyer like Cicero.>
I am Appius Claudius Cicero and I agree with Priscus when he says:
<The greatest danger to Rome, is not the opinions of Appius Claudius
Priscus, assiduus & plebeian citizen.>

David Kling (Modianus) wrote:
<You speak as if you consider the label of neo-Nazi a badge of honor. It is
not. It is a disgusting and despicable ideology.>
I don't care of your ideology, but if you or Appius Claudius Priscus want to
talk about it, never mind! You are not to blame just because your religion,
your ideas or your dreams are not like mine. But Modianus hates him; he
wrote:
< As was reported by one of
the Tribunes I have convened the Senate of Nova Roma to issue a Senatus
Consultum Ultimum investing both Consuls with the authority to expel you
from Nova Roma.
If the senate of Nova Roma deems it necessary to collectively reject my
proposed Senatus Consultum Ultimum then I will use other methods, according
to Nova Roma law, to see you expelled from Nova Roma. Appius Claudius
Priscus you are a danger to Nova Roma. (omissis) Your extremist views
are incompatible with the vision of Nova Roma.>
Modianus is a danger for civil mores, he wants his vision to be the only
one: no other ideas if they are not compatible with his vision! No other
citizens if they pray some god different from his god, if their flag is not
his flag.

QFabiusMaxmi@...
wrote:
<You acted as a disruptive force in dealing with
the federal government with an un authorized offer in NOVA ROMA INC. BoD
names. (omissis) by hurting our
business with your unauthorized offer in our name means you have
overstepped the
authority which you agreed to when you joined us.>
Offer?

"Tita Artoria Marcella" icehunter@...
wrote:
< And did you contact the U.S. government on behalf of Nova Roma? >
and "Diana Aventina" diana@...
<I've spoken to both Appius Claudius and Consul Modianus offlist during the
last two days. Since I
was wrongfully accused of being a fascist in 1999 and a witch-hunt was
launched against me, I wanted
to make sure that this person was not being wrongfully accused.>
If you are fascist or socialist or jew or catholic, I don't care a pin. Why
should someone waste time to accuse you? I don't understand the meaning of
this futile discussion about ideas, but
< His hand was forced by Appius Claudius when he
represented NR to the US govenment.>
and "David Kling (Modianus)" tau.athanasios@...
wrote:
<because he has contacted macronational
authorities, namely the USA, to attempt to gain a grant to establish Nova
Roma as an "independant" country in modern day Iraq/Iran.>
What does it mean???
If USA will establish Nova Roma in Iraq/Iran (Iraq o Iran?) senatus
populusque novaromanorum could say: no, thanks. Is it dangerosu for NR? Too
many words for nothing!
Modianus is too much involved:
<After issuing his intercessio Tribune Gn. Salvius Astur submitted a Petitio
Actionis against Appius Claudius Priscus and as Consul I have accepted the
Petitio and will hear the case myself.>
Valete
ACC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44176 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
---

Salvete Marinus Censor et Omnes:

To our Curule Aedile you wrote:

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "CN•EQVIT•MARINVS \(Gnaeus Equitius
Marinus\)" <gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Cato,
>
> > Is not his true name Appius Claudius Priscus?
>
> Only within Nova Roma. This nota has ramifications that go beyond
Nova Roma.


It is our short term repudiation of this man.

Pompeia Respondeo: And it is also a major stain on his acquiring a
fair trial. It would seem, with respect, that you have issued a
statement marking his past actions immoral....No problem there in
itself, except that we are trying him for these matters under the
Lex Salicia....for the purpose of giving this fellow a fair trial.

In theory and in practice, you are pronouncing his supposed
illegalities 'immoral' when said illegalities have not yet been duly
established in a court of law.

There are many opinions, and I have my own... but yours is formal
and official, with punishments assigned before he is declared guilty.

The cart has in this case been put well ahead of the horse.
Slapping a pre trial nota on someone for immoralities based on stuff
for which he/she is to be declared guilty, is like saying to
someone 'you will have a fair trial, and then you will be
shot'......no?

Hopefully those vested with the power of judging this person will be
able to 'erase' these actions from their minds and stick to the
evidence alone, rather than be influenced by the collective
judgement of two major, popular veteran magistrates....the official
guardians of public morality..



Valete
Pompeia
>
> Vale,
>
> CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44177 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Salve Consul,

pompeia_minucia_tiberia <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> writes:

> It would seem, with respect, that you have issued a
> statement marking his past actions immoral....No problem there in
> itself, except that we are trying him for these matters under the
> Lex Salicia....for the purpose of giving this fellow a fair trial.

Trials and judgements are independent of the moral judgements of the censors
consul. My colleague and I have considered his actions and concluded that
they constitute an offence against the public morality. This is not an
instruction to the iudices who will hear his case.

> In theory and in practice, you are pronouncing his supposed
> illegalities 'immoral' when said illegalities have not yet been duly
> established in a court of law.

These are two different things consul. It is our duty to uphold the public
morality. Furthermore, it was my understanding that my colleague had given
you prior notification of our intent to publish this nota. I did not receive
any private objection from you.

> There are many opinions, and I have my own... but yours is formal
> and official,

Indeed it is.

> with punishments assigned before he is declared guilty.

Our censorial judgement does not require a formal trial. Nor does our nota
banish him from Nova Roma. That is up to the iudices who will hear his case.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44178 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
---Salve Marinus Censor et Salvete Omnes:

No, you did not receive any private objection from me to this nota.
However, at the time, a trial was not in progress, nor at that point
was it being considered when I made any comment. And you do not need
my permission to issue a nota, indeed.

I am giving you the same opinion I gave L. Cornelius Sulla then
Censor in 2004 when Taurinus was being charged with falsifying his
personal information to the Censor in the Back Alley. A nota was
issued declaring his illegal actions 'immoral' before they were
formally rendered illegal by trial verdict in the first place.

Sulla ended up in turn being charged with iniuria I believe, which
of course was dismissed as NR history tells us and the law has since
been amended that sitting magistrates can't be prosecuted....or
something to that effect.

So, it caused a bit of a curfluffle.


There are some correlations between immorality and illegality.
The reason for laws is to guard the common good and morality. The
sum total of laws, well, atleast in theory, is justice.

This nota would have been more appropriate in my opinion issued
after the trial, when and if its basis is validated by those judging
the case.

Valete
Pompeia




In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "CN•EQVIT•MARINVS \(Gnaeus Equitius
Marinus\)" <gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Consul,
>
> pompeia_minucia_tiberia <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> writes:
>
> > It would seem, with respect, that you have issued a
> > statement marking his past actions immoral....No problem there in
> > itself, except that we are trying him for these matters under the
> > Lex Salicia....for the purpose of giving this fellow a fair
trial.
>
> Trials and judgements are independent of the moral judgements of
the censors
> consul. My colleague and I have considered his actions and
concluded that
> they constitute an offence against the public morality. This is
not an
> instruction to the iudices who will hear his case.
>
> > In theory and in practice, you are pronouncing his supposed
> > illegalities 'immoral' when said illegalities have not yet been
duly
> > established in a court of law.
>
> These are two different things consul. It is our duty to uphold
the public
> morality. Furthermore, it was my understanding that my colleague
had given
> you prior notification of our intent to publish this nota. I did
not receive
> any private objection from you.
>
> > There are many opinions, and I have my own... but yours is formal
> > and official,
>
> Indeed it is.
>
> > with punishments assigned before he is declared guilty.
>
> Our censorial judgement does not require a formal trial. Nor does
our nota
> banish him from Nova Roma. That is up to the iudices who will
hear his case.
>
> Vale,
>
> CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44179 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Edictum Praetorium VIII
Edictum Praetorium VIII

Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus, Praetor

Having been charged with service as Iudex in accordance with the
Lex Salicia Ivdiciaria for the Petitio actionis of Domitius
Constantinus Fuscus against Caius Minucius Scaevola in which
Domitius Constantinus Fuscus alleged that Caius Minucius Scaevola
has committed: Calvmniae (Libel and Slander)

These Roman Citizens:

A. Arria Carina
A. Gratius Avitus
Titus Flavius Vespasianus
Caius Ianus Flaminius
Titus Licinius Crassus
V Ritulia Enodiaria
Appius Tullius Marcellus Cato
Annia Ulleris Machinatrix.
Gallio Velius Marsallas
L. Vitellius Triarius

Have by majority vote acquitted Caius Minucius Scaevola of Calvmniae

The case is dismissed and all parties have my thanks for conducting
themselves as Romans.


Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetor

Given this the 7th day of June 2759 A.V.C. at 2:40 am Roman time
In the consulship of Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus and Pompeia Minucia
Strabo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44180 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: New Provisional Citizen
Salvete omnes,

Well I got my wife to join Nova Roma. She has had her hands full being
in charge of our Mexican association but she figured she certainly has
time for NR also. B has always supported my endevours with NR and has
great interest in Ancient Rome. We have done ancient cooking together
and her cooking skills are lengendary in her community. She's a good
seamstress also and has the potential to make Roman clothing, jewelry
etc. She'll be a great asset when our get togethers come up! Anyway
I'll show her the ropes and get her up to speed.

Her Roman name is now Vibia Lucretia Camilla.

Regards,

QSP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44181 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: New Provisional Citizen
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Quinto Suetonio Paulino salutem dicit

I love the name Lucretia.

Its so nice to see couples joining Nova Roma!

Vale:

Modianus

On 6/6/06, Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) <mjk@...>
wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Well I got my wife to join Nova Roma. She has had her hands full being
> in charge of our Mexican association but she figured she certainly has
> time for NR also. B has always supported my endevours with NR and has
> great interest in Ancient Rome. We have done ancient cooking together
> and her cooking skills are lengendary in her community. She's a good
> seamstress also and has the potential to make Roman clothing, jewelry
> etc. She'll be a great asset when our get togethers come up! Anyway
> I'll show her the ropes and get her up to speed.
>
> Her Roman name is now Vibia Lucretia Camilla.
>
> Regards,
>
> QSP
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44182 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
C. Equitius Cato P. Tiberiae Straboni consule Cn. Equitio Marino
censore quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Censor, consul, this is precisely why I brought up the necessity of
seperating Claudius Priscus *beliefs* from his *actions*. Consul,
while I actually sympathize to a degree with the point you seem to be
making --- that the nota might "poison the well" of the thoughts of
the iudices involved in passing judgement in the case --- I must
strongly disagree with the idea that "morality" and "legality" are in
any way connected. If this were the case there would never have
arisen universal suffrage, the recognition of racial equality, and a
host of other societal changes that were, in their own time, viewed as
"immoral".

Claudius Priscus has not broken the law by simply believing things
with which anyone else might disagree --- or even by speaking about
his beliefs. But the censors, acting as guardians of the "public
morality", which I understand to mean the stated ideals and goals of
the Republic, do in fact have the right --- perhaps even the
responsibility --- to issue a nota against a citizen they believe has
broken the social rules under which the Republic claims to operate.
The censors have found that Claudius Priscus' beliefs have caused him
to act in a way that violates the letter, spirit and intent of the
public values to which the Republic adheres. The censors have not
declared him guilty of a breach of the law.

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44183 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: New Provisional Citizen
Salve Quintus Suetonius Paulinus

You dog :)

You didn't tell be about this joyous news when we spoke last night.

Congrats to you and

Welcome to Vibia Lucretia Camilla! Now we have the better half : )

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
(Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Well I got my wife to join Nova Roma. She has had her hands full
being
> in charge of our Mexican association but she figured she certainly
has
> time for NR also. B has always supported my endevours with NR and
has
> great interest in Ancient Rome. We have done ancient cooking
together
> and her cooking skills are lengendary in her community. She's a
good
> seamstress also and has the potential to make Roman clothing,
jewelry
> etc. She'll be a great asset when our get togethers come up!
Anyway
> I'll show her the ropes and get her up to speed.
>
> Her Roman name is now Vibia Lucretia Camilla.
>
> Regards,
>
> QSP
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44184 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
---Salve Equitius Cato et Salvete Omnes:
So........you are saying that the nota in question cites
strictly 'moral' issues, and not 'legal' issues....the censors'
statement having nothing whatsoever to do with the actual charges
against the reus (defendant)....? Are you sure? :) I don't think
he is being charged for his beliefs but rather against against Nova
Roma catalyzed by these beliefs. You may want to recheck things
here.

And morality and legality are totally separate? Actually, all I am
questioning, and very lightly, as this might poison the well of
objectivity, as you say.

So, if morality and legality are so totally separate, as you argue
below then why did you get all bent out of shape about L. Cornelius
Sulla's nota in 2004, right after the 'legal' charges were dismissed
against your client??..If Sulla had the obligation to call a spade a
spade in terms of what he defined as immorality irrespective of the
legal issues at hand...why would this make a difference to you...to
the extent where you would countersue on behalf of your
client...remember, you are staunchly disagreeing tonight that
morality and illegality have any connection.

???
Valete
Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato P. Tiberiae Straboni consule Cn. Equitio Marino
> censore quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> Censor, consul, this is precisely why I brought up the necessity of
> seperating Claudius Priscus *beliefs* from his *actions*. Consul,
> while I actually sympathize to a degree with the point you seem to
be
> making --- that the nota might "poison the well" of the thoughts of
> the iudices involved in passing judgement in the case --- I must
> strongly disagree with the idea that "morality" and "legality" are
in
> any way connected. If this were the case there would never have
> arisen universal suffrage, the recognition of racial equality, and
a
> host of other societal changes that were, in their own time,
viewed as
> "immoral".
>
> Claudius Priscus has not broken the law by simply believing things
> with which anyone else might disagree --- or even by speaking about
> his beliefs. But the censors, acting as guardians of the "public
> morality", which I understand to mean the stated ideals and goals
of
> the Republic, do in fact have the right --- perhaps even the
> responsibility --- to issue a nota against a citizen they believe
has
> broken the social rules under which the Republic claims to
operate.
> The censors have found that Claudius Priscus' beliefs have caused
him
> to act in a way that violates the letter, spirit and intent of the
> public values to which the Republic adheres. The censors have not
> declared him guilty of a breach of the law.
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44185 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2006-06-06
Subject: Petitio Actio: G. Equitius Cato/Taurinus
---Salve G. Equitius Cato Curule Aedile et Salvete Omnes:




In light of your appraisal of my concerns regarding the recent Censoral
nota, (and the timing is all I objected to really), your digression on the
rights and obligations of Censors to pass notae, the separation of morality from legality etc.,
etc...all in message 44182 tonight, I would ask you to kindly
reconcile your opinions given this evening, with the text forwarded of the Lex Salicia
petitio launched by you on behalf of your client a couple of years
ago ...I am somewhat confused between the reasoning you issued in
2004 verses your current thoughts.



I welcome your clarification to my obvious confusion and innocent ignorance. I'm sure there's a logical explanation somewhere.

Valete
Pompeia





In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiuspopilliuslaenas" <ksterne@...>
wrote:

Gaius Popillius Laenas Praetor Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit,

Ex-Officio

The following petitio actionis was filed with me approximately 7 pm
Rome time, yesterday, August 30, 2004 (2757 auc).

Begin petitio:

>>Salve, Praetor.

On behalf of my client, the citizen G. Agorius Taurinus, I hereby
request that you issue a charge of Calumniae against Censor Lucius
Cornelius Sulla Felix, as described in the Lex Salicia Poenalis,
Secunda pars,
section XIV, to wit:

"CALVMNIAE (Libel and Slander):
Whoever is proven to have made to a third party a false and
defamatory statement about a person which has damaged the dignity or
reputation of that person..."

L. Cornelius Sulla Felix has claimed that my client lied on his
application to Nova Roma, and issued a Censorial Nota against him,
damaging his dignity and reputation as a citizen.

L. Cornelius Sulla Felix has caused charges to be brought upon my
client in Nova Roma, which have been dismissed as without grounds,
and damaged my client's dignity and reputation in Nova Roma.

L. Cornelius Sulla Felix has claimed again on the Main List of Nova
Roma that my client "either lied on the BA...or lied on his
application", further damaging my client's dignity and reputation in
Nova Roma.

L. Cornelius Sulla Felix has claimed that my client is guilty of
fraud; by following his claim that my client lied with the
words, "when a citizen commits fraud it is a big deal", he has
implied that my client has done so; this charge of fraud has further
damaged my client's dignity and reputation in Nova Roma.

Vale,

G. Equitius Cato
Advocatus G. Agorio Taurinum<<

End petitio.
if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d['2L49H86.IsA-']='&U=129b2kjda%2fN%3d2L49H86.IsA-%2fC%3d-1%2fD%3dFSRVY%2fB%3d-1'; if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d['xb49H86.IsA-']='&U=13abgl4nb%2fN%3dxb49H86.IsA-%2fC%3d224039.2020109.3495275.1958505%2fD%3dFOOT2%2fB%3d1052425'; if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d['xr49H86.IsA-']='&U=1265n7ns1%2fN%3dxr49H86.IsA-%2fC%3d-1%2fD%3dRS%2fB%3d-1'; if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d['x749H86.IsA-']='&U=1274mid7g%2fN%3dx749H86.IsA-%2fC%3d-1%2fD%3dRS2%2fB%3d-1';
if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d['0b49H86.IsA-']='&U=128he2qf3%2fN%3d0b49H86.IsA-%2fC%3d-1%2fD%3dMSMS%2fB%3d-1'; if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d['zL49H86.IsA-']='&U=127lc0b3q%2fN%3dzL49H86.IsA-%2fC%3d-2%2fD%3dSW5%2fB%3d-2'; if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d['zb49H86.IsA-']='&U=1271fa3qi%2fN%3dzb49H86.IsA-%2fC%3d-2%2fD%3dSW6%2fB%3d-2'; if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d['0b49H86.IsA-']='&U=128he2qf3%2fN%3d0b49H86.IsA-%2fC%3d-1%2fD%3dMSMS%2fB%3d-1'; var oReplyTop = MenuButton('replytop',Reply_Click,'replymenu',ReplyMenu_Click); var oReplyBottom = MenuButton('replybottom',Reply_Click,'replymenu',ReplyMenu_Click); var oForwardTop = MenuButton('forwardtop',Forward_Click,'forwardmenu',ForwardMenu_Click); var oForwardBottom = MenuButton('forwardbottom',Forward_Click,'forwardmenu',ForwardMenu_Click); var oMoveTop =
MenuButton('movetop',Move_Click,'movemenu',DestinationFolder_Click); var oMoveBottom = MenuButton('movebottom',Move_Click,'movemenu',DestinationFolder_Click); if(window.yzq_p==null)document.write(""); if(window.yzq_p)yzq_p('P=JV9O.M6.JUvEpRVnRH.3iQBvQ0SKy0SGP14ADppX&T=13pteqnur%2fX%3d1149648737%2fE%3d150500004%2fR%3dmail%2fK%3d5%2fV%3d1.1%2fW%3dJ%2fY%3dYAHOO%2fF%3d208295263%2fS%3d1%2fJ%3d4225BECE'); if(window.yzq_s)yzq_s(); postamble();

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44186 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: New Provisional Citizen
> Salve, Q. Suetoni Pauline, et salvete, omnes!
>
>
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Well I got my wife to join Nova Roma.
>
> ATS: Congratulations!
>
>
> She has had her hands full being
> in charge of our Mexican association but she figured she certainly has
> time for NR also. B has always supported my endevours with NR and has
> great interest in Ancient Rome. We have done ancient cooking together
> and her cooking skills are lengendary in her community. She's a good
> seamstress also and has the potential to make Roman clothing, jewelry
> etc. She'll be a great asset when our get togethers come up! Anyway
> I'll show her the ropes and get her up to speed.
>
>
> ATS: Just so long as you don¹t take her citizenship test for her... ;-)
> Are you planning on adding her to my class list for Latin 101 methodo
> tralatico?
>
> Does your magistra get some samples of this famous cooking? Sewing? We
> have a Mexican in the censor¹s office who might be interested...if he¹s still
> alive, that is.
>
> Her Roman name is now Vibia Lucretia Camilla.
>
> Regards,
>
> QSP
>
> Regards,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44187 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: An Invitation & a slight interruption
My apologies for posting this here but I wanted to inform any
listmembers who reside in the Southeastern states that make up the
province and who are not members of the Provincial List, of what is
happening. I would like to recommend that that any citizens or other
individuals living in America Austrorientalis please subscribe to the
list as there will be a fair number of interesting events being
posted on it.

Austrorientalis-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

F. Galerius Aurelianus
Propraetor et Flamen Cerialis
**********************************************************************

I, Flavius Galerius Aurelianus, Propraetor America Austrorientalis
hereby reaffirm the following edicta of my predecessor:

EDICTUM I - Establishment of Provincial mailing list at:

<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Austrorientalis/>

EDICTUM III - Establishment of Provincial Offices.

EDICTUM VIII - Designation of Provincial Patron Deities.

EDICTUM XVI - Appointment of Praefectus Regio Tennessee

EDICTUM XIX - Reorganization of Regiones

EDICTUM XX - Confirmation of Appointments of Praefectus Regio
Carolina & Sacerdos Prima Austrorientalis

EDICTUM XXI - Establishment Of Provincial Web Site at
<http://austrorientalis.bravehost.com/>.

EDICTUM XXII - Appointment of Curator Anarei of Provincial Web Site

The full text of these EDICTA may be found at:

<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Austrorientalis/>

This edictum becomes effective immediately.

I wish to thank my materfamilias, Helena Galeria Aureliana, and
Lucius Vitellius Triarius for volunteering to keep serving the
province.

Given under my hand, this day June 06 2759 auc, in the Consulship
of Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus and Pompeia Minucia Strabo.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44188 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Petitio Actio: G. Equitius Cato/Taurinus
Salve Consul.

I rather think this is a case of apples and oranges.

I think the point Cato was trying to make from my recollection of
the incident, was that Sulla Censor had interpreted facts to draw a
conclusion, which it was alleged was harmful to Taurinus's
reputation. The nota in this case was thus based on an
*interpretation* of facts (some of which were in dispute I think).

In this case I don't see that the Censors have interpreted anything.
They have simply stated the facts, which from the limited disclosure
on this list, do not seem to have been contested. The nota in this
case was based on the facts themselves.

I believe a subtle, but important, difference exists between the two
cases. At no point have either of our current Censor's interpreted
any actions of Priscus, they simply have taken the facts and weighed
them against the standards they see for morality within Nova Roma,
which is their function. Sulla Censor by contrast took the facts
(some of which were in dispute) and interpreted them and then
weighed that interpretation of the facts against what he saw as the
moral standard. He was not wrong to do so in my view, and nor was
what he did a departure from the function of his office. The facts
in the case of Taurinus required interpretation, but here in this
case they do not. They simply stand on their own.

Vale
Cn. Iulius Caesar


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Pompeia Minucia Strabo
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> ---Salve G. Equitius Cato Curule Aedile et Salvete Omnes:
>
>
>
>
> In light of your appraisal of my concerns regarding the recent
Censoral
> nota, (and the timing is all I objected to really), your
digression on the
> rights and obligations of Censors to pass notae, the separation of
morality from legality etc.,
> etc...all in message 44182 tonight, I would ask you to kindly
> reconcile your opinions given this evening, with the text
forwarded of the Lex Salicia
> petitio launched by you on behalf of your client a couple of years
> ago ...I am somewhat confused between the reasoning you issued in
> 2004 verses your current thoughts.
>
>
>
> I welcome your clarification to my obvious confusion and
innocent ignorance. I'm sure there's a logical explanation somewhere.
>
> Valete
> Pompeia
>
>
>
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiuspopilliuslaenas" <ksterne@>
> wrote:
>
> Gaius Popillius Laenas Praetor Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit,
>
> Ex-Officio
>
> The following petitio actionis was filed with me approximately 7
pm
> Rome time, yesterday, August 30, 2004 (2757 auc).
>
> Begin petitio:
>
> >>Salve, Praetor.
>
> On behalf of my client, the citizen G. Agorius Taurinus, I hereby
> request that you issue a charge of Calumniae against Censor Lucius
> Cornelius Sulla Felix, as described in the Lex Salicia Poenalis,
> Secunda pars,
> section XIV, to wit:
>
> "CALVMNIAE (Libel and Slander):
> Whoever is proven to have made to a third party a false and
> defamatory statement about a person which has damaged the dignity
or
> reputation of that person..."
>
> L. Cornelius Sulla Felix has claimed that my client lied on his
> application to Nova Roma, and issued a Censorial Nota against him,
> damaging his dignity and reputation as a citizen.
>
> L. Cornelius Sulla Felix has caused charges to be brought upon my
> client in Nova Roma, which have been dismissed as without grounds,
> and damaged my client's dignity and reputation in Nova Roma.
>
> L. Cornelius Sulla Felix has claimed again on the Main List of Nova
> Roma that my client "either lied on the BA...or lied on his
> application", further damaging my client's dignity and reputation
in
> Nova Roma.
>
> L. Cornelius Sulla Felix has claimed that my client is guilty of
> fraud; by following his claim that my client lied with the
> words, "when a citizen commits fraud it is a big deal", he has
> implied that my client has done so; this charge of fraud has
further
> damaged my client's dignity and reputation in Nova Roma.
>
> Vale,
>
> G. Equitius Cato
> Advocatus G. Agorio Taurinum<<
>
> End petitio.
> if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d
['2L49H86.IsA-']='&U=129b2kjda%2fN%3d2L49H86.IsA-%2fC%3d-1%2fD%
3dFSRVY%2fB%3d-1'; if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object
(); window.yzq_d['xb49H86.IsA-']='&U=13abgl4nb%2fN%3dxb49H86.IsA-%
2fC%3d224039.2020109.3495275.1958505%2fD%3dFOOT2%2fB%
3d1052425'; if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object();
window.yzq_d['xr49H86.IsA-']='&U=1265n7ns1%2fN%3dxr49H86.IsA-%2fC%3d-
1%2fD%3dRS%2fB%3d-1'; if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new
Object(); window.yzq_d['x749H86.IsA-']='&U=1274mid7g%2fN%
3dx749H86.IsA-%2fC%3d-1%2fD%3dRS2%2fB%3d-1';
> if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d
['0b49H86.IsA-']='&U=128he2qf3%2fN%3d0b49H86.IsA-%2fC%3d-1%2fD%
3dMSMS%2fB%3d-1'; if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object
(); window.yzq_d['zL49H86.IsA-']='&U=127lc0b3q%2fN%3dzL49H86.IsA-%
2fC%3d-2%2fD%3dSW5%2fB%3d-2'; if(window.yzq_d==null)
window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d['zb49H86.IsA-']
='&U=1271fa3qi%2fN%3dzb49H86.IsA-%2fC%3d-2%2fD%3dSW6%2fB%3d-2';
if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d
['0b49H86.IsA-']='&U=128he2qf3%2fN%3d0b49H86.IsA-%2fC%3d-1%2fD%
3dMSMS%2fB%3d-1'; var oReplyTop = MenuButton
('replytop',Reply_Click,'replymenu',ReplyMenu_Click); var
oReplyBottom = MenuButton
('replybottom',Reply_Click,'replymenu',ReplyMenu_Click); var
oForwardTop = MenuButton
('forwardtop',Forward_Click,'forwardmenu',ForwardMenu_Click); var
oForwardBottom = MenuButton
('forwardbottom',Forward_Click,'forwardmenu',ForwardMenu_Click);
var oMoveTop =
> MenuButton
('movetop',Move_Click,'movemenu',DestinationFolder_Click); var
oMoveBottom = MenuButton
('movebottom',Move_Click,'movemenu',DestinationFolder_Click);
if(window.yzq_p==null)document.write(""); if(window.yzq_p)
yzq_p('P=JV9O.M6.JUvEpRVnRH.3iQBvQ0SKy0SGP14ADppX&T=13pteqnur%2fX%
3d1149648737%2fE%3d150500004%2fR%3dmail%2fK%3d5%2fV%3d1.1%2fW%3dJ%
2fY%3dYAHOO%2fF%3d208295263%2fS%3d1%2fJ%3d4225BECE'); if
(window.yzq_s)yzq_s(); postamble();
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44189 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: New Provisional Citizen
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:
>
>
> Her Roman name is now Vibia Lucretia Camilla.
>
> Regards,
>
> QSP
>

Then let me extend the warmest welcome on behalf of all the Lucretii!

Optime valete

M. Lucretius Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44190 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: New Provisional Citizen
C. Equitius Cato Q. Seutonio Paulino V. Lucretiae Camillae sal.

Salvete!

Felicitations and a warmest welcome to Lucretia Camilla! Woot!

Valete bene,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Well I got my wife to join Nova Roma. She has had her hands full being
> in charge of our Mexican association but she figured she certainly has
> time for NR also. B has always supported my endevours with NR and has
> great interest in Ancient Rome. We have done ancient cooking together
> and her cooking skills are lengendary in her community. She's a good
> seamstress also and has the potential to make Roman clothing, jewelry
> etc. She'll be a great asset when our get togethers come up! Anyway
> I'll show her the ropes and get her up to speed.
>
> Her Roman name is now Vibia Lucretia Camilla.
>
> Regards,
>
> QSP
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44191 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: a.d. VII Id. Iun.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem VII Idus Iunius; haec dies nefastus est.

"On the third dawn after the Nones, it's said that Phoebe
Chases away Arcturus, and the Bear's free of fear of her ward.
Then I recall, too, I've seen games, named for you
Smooth-flowing Tiber, held on the turf in the Field of Mars.
The day's a festival for those who tug at dripping lines,
And hide their bronze hooks under little strands of bait." - Ovid,
Fasti VI

"But Rhea was subject in love to Kronos and bare splendid children,
Hestia, Demeter, and gold-shod Hera and strong Haides ... and the
loud-crashing Earth-Shaker [Poseidon], and wise Zeus ... These great
Kronos swallowed as each came forth from the womb to his mother's
knees ... Therefore he kept no blind outlook, but watched and
swallowed down his children ... As the years rolled on, great Kronos
the wily was beguiled by the deep suggestions of Gaia (Earth), and
brought up again his offspring, vanquished by the arts and might of
his own son, and he vomited up first the stone which he had swallowed
last." - Hesiod, Theogony 453

"To Hestia, Fumigation from Aromatics. Daughter of Kronos, venerable
dame, who dwellest amidst great fire's eternal flame; in sacred rites
these ministers are thine, mystics much blessed, holy and divine. In
thee the Gods have fixed their dwelling place, strong, stable basis of
the mortal race. Eternal, much formed, ever florid queen, laughing and
blessed, and of lovely mien; accept these rites, accord each just
desire, and gentle health and needful good inspire." - Orphic Hymn 84
to Hestia

"Zeus the Father gave her a high honour instead of marriage, and she
has her place in the midst of the house and has the richest portion.
In all the temples of the gods she has a share of honour, and among
all mortal men she is chief of the goddesses." - Homeric Hymn V to
Aphrodite 18

"Zeus, the mighty lord, holding the reins of a winged chariot, leads
the way in heaven, ordering all and taking care of all; and there
follows him the array of gods and demigods, marshalled in eleven
bands; Hestia alone abides at home in the house of heaven." - Plato,
Phaedrus 246

"The goddess whom they call Hestia. Her power extends over altars and
hearths, and therefore all prayers and all sacrifices end with this
goddess, because she is the guardian of the innermost things." -
Cicero, De Natura Deorum 2.27

Today is held in honor of Vesta, the Roman goddess of the hearth and
home, known to the Greeks as Hestia. On this day the Romans opened
the penus vestae, the room of sacred objects, including the palladium
and the images of the state penates. The doors would be opened to the
matrons of the city would walk barefoot through the streets carrying
offerings of food.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Homer, Cicero, Hesiod, the Orphic Poet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44192 From: fenris_kiel Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, dicconf <dicconf@...> wrote:
>
> The NSDAP -- Nazional-Socialische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei, the
official
> name of the Nazis -- was specifically a _German_ organization, as
the name
> tells us. Is this "NSDAP" that A. Claudius Priscus is associated
with
> some bizarre sort of historic recreationist group?
>
> > "A cactolith is a quasihorizontal chonolith composed of
anastomosing
> > ductoliths whose distal ends curl like a harpolith, thin like a
> > sphenolith, or bulge discordantly like an akmolith or ethmolith."
> > (from _Geology and Geography of the Henry Mountains Region,
Utah_)
>
> Mehercle! I never knew that.
>
> -- Publius Livius Triarius
> Curiosity thrilled the cat
>
Salve!

I'm sorry, but I have to correct you. NSDAP stands for
Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiter Partei. And yes, it was a
German party, but similar organisations existed and still exist in
many other countries. They just have other names. But that's no
excuse. I'm german and some members were in "the party" in the late
'30s and '40s. The german people paid a bitter price for following
this bastard Hitler and this should never happen again. We now face
the problem of increasing neo-nazism in Germany. The problem is not
the average "dumb" skinhead-bully, but the educated, suit-wearing,
intelligent Neo-Nazis.
Sorry, for my first post in a NR-forum being like this, but I can't
stand fascists.

Gaius Marius Tacitus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44193 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Petitio Actio: G. Equitius Cato/Taurinus
---Salve Caesar et Salvete Omnes:

Oh nobody is putting Aedile Cato on trial here.....when he gets into
a jam his quaestor defends his position? Seems to happen alot.

No, it is still 'fruit'...if you want to dissect the matter to
apples and oranges, you are at liberty to do so. Its close enough.
He took a slightly more *liberal* attitude two years ago in contrast
to the current *staunch* disagreement he assumes now, and attempts
to slap my hand over.

But you are entitled to your opinions,as I am entitled to mine.

Valete
Pompeia










In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
<gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Consul.
>
> I rather think this is a case of apples and oranges.
>
> I think the point Cato was trying to make from my recollection of
> the incident, was that Sulla Censor had interpreted facts to draw
a
> conclusion, which it was alleged was harmful to Taurinus's
> reputation. The nota in this case was thus based on an
> *interpretation* of facts (some of which were in dispute I think).
>
> In this case I don't see that the Censors have interpreted
anything.
> They have simply stated the facts, which from the limited
disclosure
> on this list, do not seem to have been contested. The nota in this
> case was based on the facts themselves.
>
> I believe a subtle, but important, difference exists between the
two
> cases. At no point have either of our current Censor's interpreted
> any actions of Priscus, they simply have taken the facts and
weighed
> them against the standards they see for morality within Nova Roma,
> which is their function. Sulla Censor by contrast took the facts
> (some of which were in dispute) and interpreted them and then
> weighed that interpretation of the facts against what he saw as
the
> moral standard. He was not wrong to do so in my view, and nor was
> what he did a departure from the function of his office. The facts
> in the case of Taurinus required interpretation, but here in this
> case they do not. They simply stand on their own.
>
> Vale
> Cn. Iulius Caesar
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Pompeia Minucia Strabo
> <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@> wrote:
> >
> > ---Salve G. Equitius Cato Curule Aedile et Salvete Omnes:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In light of your appraisal of my concerns regarding the recent
> Censoral
> > nota, (and the timing is all I objected to really), your
> digression on the
> > rights and obligations of Censors to pass notae, the separation
of
> morality from legality etc.,
> > etc...all in message 44182 tonight, I would ask you to kindly
> > reconcile your opinions given this evening, with the text
> forwarded of the Lex Salicia
> > petitio launched by you on behalf of your client a couple of
years
> > ago ...I am somewhat confused between the reasoning you issued
in
> > 2004 verses your current thoughts.
> >
> >
> >
> > I welcome your clarification to my obvious confusion and
> innocent ignorance. I'm sure there's a logical explanation
somewhere.
> >
> > Valete
> > Pompeia
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiuspopilliuslaenas" <ksterne@>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Gaius Popillius Laenas Praetor Quiritibus salutem plurimam
dicit,
> >
> > Ex-Officio
> >
> > The following petitio actionis was filed with me approximately 7
> pm
> > Rome time, yesterday, August 30, 2004 (2757 auc).
> >
> > Begin petitio:
> >
> > >>Salve, Praetor.
> >
> > On behalf of my client, the citizen G. Agorius Taurinus, I hereby
> > request that you issue a charge of Calumniae against Censor
Lucius
> > Cornelius Sulla Felix, as described in the Lex Salicia Poenalis,
> > Secunda pars,
> > section XIV, to wit:
> >
> > "CALVMNIAE (Libel and Slander):
> > Whoever is proven to have made to a third party a false and
> > defamatory statement about a person which has damaged the
dignity
> or
> > reputation of that person..."
> >
> > L. Cornelius Sulla Felix has claimed that my client lied on his
> > application to Nova Roma, and issued a Censorial Nota against
him,
> > damaging his dignity and reputation as a citizen.
> >
> > L. Cornelius Sulla Felix has caused charges to be brought upon my
> > client in Nova Roma, which have been dismissed as without
grounds,
> > and damaged my client's dignity and reputation in Nova Roma.
> >
> > L. Cornelius Sulla Felix has claimed again on the Main List of
Nova
> > Roma that my client "either lied on the BA...or lied on his
> > application", further damaging my client's dignity and
reputation
> in
> > Nova Roma.
> >
> > L. Cornelius Sulla Felix has claimed that my client is guilty of
> > fraud; by following his claim that my client lied with the
> > words, "when a citizen commits fraud it is a big deal", he has
> > implied that my client has done so; this charge of fraud has
> further
> > damaged my client's dignity and reputation in Nova Roma.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > G. Equitius Cato
> > Advocatus G. Agorio Taurinum<<
> >
> > End petitio.
> > if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object();
window.yzq_d
> ['2L49H86.IsA-']='&U=129b2kjda%2fN%3d2L49H86.IsA-%2fC%3d-1%2fD%
> 3dFSRVY%2fB%3d-1'; if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new
Object
> (); window.yzq_d['xb49H86.IsA-']='&U=13abgl4nb%2fN%3dxb49H86.IsA-%
> 2fC%3d224039.2020109.3495275.1958505%2fD%3dFOOT2%2fB%
> 3d1052425'; if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object();
> window.yzq_d['xr49H86.IsA-']='&U=1265n7ns1%2fN%3dxr49H86.IsA-%2fC%
3d-
> 1%2fD%3dRS%2fB%3d-1'; if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new
> Object(); window.yzq_d['x749H86.IsA-']='&U=1274mid7g%2fN%
> 3dx749H86.IsA-%2fC%3d-1%2fD%3dRS2%2fB%3d-1';
> > if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d
> ['0b49H86.IsA-']='&U=128he2qf3%2fN%3d0b49H86.IsA-%2fC%3d-1%2fD%
> 3dMSMS%2fB%3d-1'; if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new
Object
> (); window.yzq_d['zL49H86.IsA-']='&U=127lc0b3q%2fN%3dzL49H86.IsA-%
> 2fC%3d-2%2fD%3dSW5%2fB%3d-2'; if(window.yzq_d==null)
> window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d['zb49H86.IsA-']
> ='&U=1271fa3qi%2fN%3dzb49H86.IsA-%2fC%3d-2%2fD%3dSW6%2fB%3d-
2';
> if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d
> ['0b49H86.IsA-']='&U=128he2qf3%2fN%3d0b49H86.IsA-%2fC%3d-1%2fD%
> 3dMSMS%2fB%3d-1'; var oReplyTop = MenuButton
> ('replytop',Reply_Click,'replymenu',ReplyMenu_Click); var
> oReplyBottom = MenuButton
> ('replybottom',Reply_Click,'replymenu',ReplyMenu_Click); var
> oForwardTop = MenuButton
> ('forwardtop',Forward_Click,'forwardmenu',ForwardMenu_Click);
var
> oForwardBottom = MenuButton
>
('forwardbottom',Forward_Click,'forwardmenu',ForwardMenu_Click);
> var oMoveTop =
> > MenuButton
> ('movetop',Move_Click,'movemenu',DestinationFolder_Click); var
> oMoveBottom = MenuButton
>
('movebottom',Move_Click,'movemenu',DestinationFolder_Click);
> if(window.yzq_p==null)document.write(""); if(window.yzq_p)
> yzq_p('P=JV9O.M6.JUvEpRVnRH.3iQBvQ0SKy0SGP14ADppX&T=13pteqnur%2fX%
> 3d1149648737%2fE%3d150500004%2fR%3dmail%2fK%3d5%2fV%3d1.1%2fW%3dJ%
> 2fY%3dYAHOO%2fF%3d208295263%2fS%3d1%2fJ%3d4225BECE'); if
> (window.yzq_s)yzq_s(); postamble();
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44194 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Petitio Actionis (corrected): G. Equitius Cato/Taurinus
C. Equitius Cato P. Tiberiae Straboni sal.

Salve, Tiberia Strabo.

Ah, so if you are shown why the two cases are, in fact, quite
different, you simply dismiss it as irrelevant? Not a
very...convincing way to engage in a discussion. The point is that
Sulla was making assumptions based on his own *interpretation* of the
facts rather than simply basing his nota on public fact. There is
(and I imagine even you can understand this) a vast difference between
the statement:

"I think Citizen X has done this."

and

"Citizen X has done this."

It seems as if anyone who even remotely appears to understand the very
important difference in the two cases is subject to your scorn,
consul. Unfortunate. And once more you have taken a simple
disagreement over a particular issue and made it somehow...personal.
Unfortunate.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44195 From: Brutus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Talk on Religio Romana
Salve Vare!

A good weekend indeed. I've attached the documents below. I'll be in touch in more length shortly.

Vale!

Brutus

David Carey <certus2306@...> wrote:
Salve Brute,

I hope that you had a great weekend and so good to hear that you didn't start any wars! ;-D

I would love to see what you presented to the gathering.

Vale,

M. Aurelius Varus

caiusmoraviusbrutus <crwbanmor@...> wrote:
Salvete Omnes!

My local Pagan Community in Dorset, England hold an annual gathering
at the beginning of June which lasts a few days, consisting of
various social and ritual activities. There are also a number of
talks and workshops. While the emphasis is generally on local Pagan
traditions (Witchcraft/Wicca/Celtic Reconstructionism/Shamanism and
so on) I was kindly given the opportunity to present a talk on the
Religio Romana this year. Obviously I did this in a personal and non-
official capacity. I spoke primarily on domestic religion but touched
on a few other areas before finishing with a brief ritual. Despite a
certain initial apprehension on the part of some of the Celts it all
went very well and unpleasant international incidents of any kind
were avoided. The talk itself was based on an article of my own
called "A Brief Introduction to Roman Paganism". I also prepared a
very simple "Beginners Guide to the Religio Romana" for the talk. If
anyone wishes to see these contact me directly and I'll send you a
copy. Both are available in Microsoft Word and are about four pages
long (A4).

Valete!

Caius Moravius Brutus

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






"It's all right,lads: the chickens say it's going to be all right..."

The Emperor Claudius
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44196 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium VIII
SALVE HON. PRAETOR !

Can you present, if is possible and legal, the votes results in
figures ?
For exemple : 7-3 or 6 -5... ?

VALE,
IVL SABINVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tiberius Galerius Paulinus"
<spqr753@...> wrote:
>
> Edictum Praetorium VIII
>
> Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus, Praetor
>
> Having been charged with service as Iudex in accordance with the
> Lex Salicia Ivdiciaria for the Petitio actionis of Domitius
> Constantinus Fuscus against Caius Minucius Scaevola in which
> Domitius Constantinus Fuscus alleged that Caius Minucius Scaevola
> has committed: Calvmniae (Libel and Slander)
>
> These Roman Citizens:
>
> A. Arria Carina
> A. GratiusAvitus
> Titus Flavius Vespasianus
> Caius Ianus Flaminius
> Titus Licinius Crassus
> V Ritulia Enodiaria
> Appius Tullius Marcellus Cato
> Annia Ulleris Machinatrix.
> Gallio Velius Marsallas
> L. Vitellius Triarius
>
> Have by majority vote acquitted Caius Minucius Scaevola of
Calvmniae
>
> The case is dismissed and all parties have my thanks for
conducting
> themselves as Romans.
>
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Praetor
>
> Given this the 7th day of June 2759 A.V.C. at 2:40 am Roman time
> In the consulship of Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus and Pompeia
Minucia
> Strabo
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44197 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
>
> Pompeia Respondeo: And it is also a major stain on his acquiring a
> fair trial.

We had a method that we could have used to expel this cancer quickly
and expediously.

Instead, it has become a "turf war" between magistrates. A veto of
a SCU is ludicrous, for actions taken under a SCU are by definition
extra-constitutional.

That a known Nazi would be allowed to remain here, claiming to be
a Roman citizen, long enough for a trial (which as we have seen can
take months), is a serious stain on our honour.

This Nota is, from my perspective at least, a small attempt at erasing
that stain and restoring our collective honour, by publicly repudiating
the evil in our midst.

> Slapping a pre trial nota on someone for immoralities based on stuff
> for which he/she is to be declared guilty, is like saying to
> someone 'you will have a fair trial, and then you will be
> shot'......no?

Illegal and immoral are not the same thing; they might even, under some
regimes, be orthogonal. The activities of an apologist for Hitler who,
without authorisation, creates a false association between himself, with
his evil reputation, and Nova Roma, are beyond doubt immoral.

Valete,
M. Octavius Germanicus, Censor.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44198 From: Brutus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Talk on Religio Romana- sorry!
Salvete Omnes!

Sorry! I meant to send this direct,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Valete!

Brutus


Brutus <crwbanmor@...> wrote:
Salve Vare!

A good weekend indeed. I've attached the documents below. I'll be in touch in more length shortly.

Vale!

Brutus

David Carey <certus2306@...> wrote:
Salve Brute,

I hope that you had a great weekend and so good to hear that you didn't start any wars! ;-D

I would love to see what you presented to the gathering.

Vale,

M. Aurelius Varus

caiusmoraviusbrutus <crwbanmor@...> wrote:
Salvete Omnes!

My local Pagan Community in Dorset, England hold an annual gathering
at the beginning of June which lasts a few days, consisting of
various social and ritual activities. There are also a number of
talks and workshops. While the emphasis is generally on local Pagan
traditions (Witchcraft/Wicca/Celtic Reconstructionism/Shamanism and
so on) I was kindly given the opportunity to present a talk on the
Religio Romana this year. Obviously I did this in a personal and non-
official capacity. I spoke primarily on domestic religion but touched
on a few other areas before finishing with a brief ritual. Despite a
certain initial apprehension on the part of some of the Celts it all
went very well and unpleasant international incidents of any kind
were avoided. The talk itself was based on an article of my own
called "A Brief Introduction to Roman Paganism". I also prepared a
very simple "Beginners Guide to the Religio Romana" for the talk. If
anyone wishes to see these contact me directly and I'll send you a
copy. Both are available in Microsoft Word and are about four pages
long (A4).

Valete!

Caius Moravius Brutus

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

"It's all right,lads: the chickens say it's going to be all right..."

The Emperor Claudius
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






"It's all right,lads: the chickens say it's going to be all right..."

The Emperor Claudius
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44199 From: appiusclaudiuspriscus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Salvete omnes!

The Germanicus I wanted to follow, conquered, or more accurately,
justly intervened between, Germans, but did not hate them.

Valete!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44200 From: Claudio Guzzo Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Priscus and his crimes
Posted by: "Maior" rory12001@... rory12001
Mon Jun 5, 2006 6:42 pm (PST)
M. Hortensia P.Strabonis Q. Suetonio spd;
Salve Consul, well so far I seem to be the only active
Jewish civis in Nova Roma, though unfortunately female;-

Actually Paulinus is making an unwarranted assumption;
Appius Claudius Priscus is not an ignorant and clueless fool who is
unable to conduct his own defense without Cordus.

He is a professional and highly educated man and a fellow alumnus.
He certainly is able to represent himself before the Iudices as well
as understand Nova Roman law.
I posted over at Latinitas a while ago a strong position on free
speech, even for that which may be personally offensive; eg; neo
nazis parading in Illinois or any other place they desire.
Priscus is in no danger of being railroaded. He is erudite and
educated enough to represent himself and his views to the Iudices.
Valete
M. Hortensia Maior, aedilis plebis

Salve.
I think it is not easy to understand Nova Roman laws, if there is capitis deminutio for Priscus just because he said something about his ideas or just because he asked to USA to create a state called Nova Roma in Iraq or Iran.
Kafka could understand it...
Priscus needs someone who defend him.
Vale.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44201 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
C. Equitius Cato M. Octavio Germanico sal.

Salve, Octavius Germanicus.

"That a known Nazi would be allowed to remain here, claiming to be
a Roman citizen, long enough for a trial (which as we have seen can
take months), is a serious stain on our honour."

Censor, I cannot express how much I sympathize with the *spirit* of
your outrage; but it is a practice common to fascist states to condemn
their citizens without trial.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44202 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Off topic posts
Salve Romans

I have just rejected a post that touches on WWII and macro national
politics of a very discordant nature. Please post on Nova Roma or
Ancient Rome as that is our focus.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44203 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Cato writes:

> Censor, I cannot express how much I sympathize with the *spirit* of
> your outrage; but it is a practice common to fascist states to condemn
> their citizens without trial.

No one will get their head chopped off here; this is a voluntary social
club, and people are kicked out of such all the time without elaborate
procedures.

Vale, O.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44204 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
> The Germanicus I wanted to follow, conquered, or more accurately,
> justly intervened between, Germans, but did not hate them.

And this one is a German by descent, and will not perpetuate,
tolerate, or sanction the evil perpetrated by my people in the
past.

- Octavius.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44205 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
C. Equitius Cato M. Octavio Germanico sal.

Salve censor.

At the risk of sounding like a fool, I perceive the Republic as
something more than a simple "voluntary social club"; we have laws and
a judicial and governmental structure. If we brush aside these
fundamental elements of a real community with such ease, we are
following a path that contradicts our vision of a real Roman Republic.
Again, I may be a fool for thinking so, but I think it is a dream
worth being somewhat foolish for.

Again, I beg you to understand that I do not support the ideologies
espoused by this citizen, and I fully recognize the responsibility of
the censors to act to protect the ideals of the State; but equating
what is legal with what is "moral" is a grave mistake.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44206 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
---Salve Octavius Censor et Salvete Omnes:

I do not object to the nota in itself....it is just the timing...I
also do not relish these trial proceedings, and pretty much agree
with your appraisal on this aspect of the matter.

If we are going to have a 'fair' trial though,....we need to take
steps that this is facilitated. Otherwise why bother? I was all for
plan A which is just showing him the door, for reasons you've
stated, if the Senate agreed to such, that is... but alas, we'll
never know.

It would be a different situation if he denied the actions and
affiliations in question...this is not the case.

I don't blame this trial issue on my colleague....this is no
reflection on him ....It's not his decretum.

But I'll never be right on this one...neither will you. What makes
right? 'Might' makes right....and we've been 'outmighted' I'm
afraid.

Pompeia Minucia Strabo
Consul Nova Roma
copresident Nova Roma INC



In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> wrote:
>
> >
> > Pompeia Respondeo: And it is also a major stain on his
acquiring a
> > fair trial.
>
> We had a method that we could have used to expel this cancer
quickly
> and expediously.
>
> Instead, it has become a "turf war" between magistrates. A veto of
> a SCU is ludicrous, for actions taken under a SCU are by definition
> extra-constitutional.
>
> That a known Nazi would be allowed to remain here, claiming to be
> a Roman citizen, long enough for a trial (which as we have seen can
> take months), is a serious stain on our honour.
>
> This Nota is, from my perspective at least, a small attempt at
erasing
> that stain and restoring our collective honour, by publicly
repudiating
> the evil in our midst.
>
> > Slapping a pre trial nota on someone for immoralities based on
stuff
> > for which he/she is to be declared guilty, is like saying to
> > someone 'you will have a fair trial, and then you will be
> > shot'......no?
>
> Illegal and immoral are not the same thing; they might even, under
some
> regimes, be orthogonal. The activities of an apologist for Hitler
who,
> without authorisation, creates a false association between
himself, with
> his evil reputation, and Nova Roma, are beyond doubt immoral.
>
> Valete,
> M. Octavius Germanicus, Censor.
>
> --
> hucke@...
> http://www.graveyards.com
>
> "What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
> clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
> over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44207 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Gaius Cassius Piso omnibus S.P.D

It seems that Cato thinks ( and it is his right ) that morality and legality are separeted. I'm a bit confused here... For example, if the Al-Qaeda act according to their moral, so the terrorism is not an legal issue?

Cato says: " The Censors have found that Claudius Priscus beliefs have caused him to act in a way that violates the letter, spirit and intent of the public values to which the Republic adheres. The censors have not declared him guilty of breach of the law ".

Once again, here my knowlegde of law and moral seems to be a little hazy...
I would appreciate if our friend and fellowcitizen Cato would public a complete list of real crimes in/against SPQR. For example, is it possible to murder someone via Internet? In Forum? In a plain daylight?
I'm waiting an answer.

Vale et valete
Gaius Cassius Piso

gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> escreveu:
C. Equitius Cato P. Tiberiae Straboni consule Cn. Equitio Marino
censore quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Censor, consul, this is precisely why I brought up the necessity of
seperating Claudius Priscus *beliefs* from his *actions*. Consul,
while I actually sympathize to a degree with the point you seem to be
making --- that the nota might "poison the well" of the thoughts of
the iudices involved in passing judgement in the case --- I must
strongly disagree with the idea that "morality" and "legality" are in
any way connected. If this were the case there would never have
arisen universal suffrage, the recognition of racial equality, and a
host of other societal changes that were, in their own time, viewed as
"immoral".

Claudius Priscus has not broken the law by simply believing things
with which anyone else might disagree --- or even by speaking about
his beliefs. But the censors, acting as guardians of the "public
morality", which I understand to mean the stated ideals and goals of
the Republic, do in fact have the right --- perhaps even the
responsibility --- to issue a nota against a citizen they believe has
broken the social rules under which the Republic claims to operate.
The censors have found that Claudius Priscus' beliefs have caused him
to act in a way that violates the letter, spirit and intent of the
public values to which the Republic adheres. The censors have not
declared him guilty of a breach of the law.

Valete bene,

Cato





__________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44208 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium VIII
Salve Titus Iulius Sabinus

Thank you for the request but I see no need to post anything more.

I will post the full results to the Court list so it can be seen by
the participants and stored for the archives.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetor


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Iulius Sabinus"
<iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
>
> SALVE HON. PRAETOR !
>
> Can you present, if is possible and legal, the votes results in
> figures ?
> For exemple : 7-3 or 6 -5... ?
>
> VALE,
> IVL SABINVS
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tiberius Galerius Paulinus"
> <spqr753@> wrote:
> >
> > Edictum Praetorium VIII
> >
> > Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus, Praetor
> >
> > Having been charged with service as Iudex in accordance with
the
> > Lex Salicia Ivdiciaria for the Petitio actionis of Domitius
> > Constantinus Fuscus against Caius Minucius Scaevola in which
> > Domitius Constantinus Fuscus alleged that Caius Minucius
Scaevola
> > has committed: Calvmniae (Libel and Slander)
> >
> > These Roman Citizens:
> >
> > A. Arria Carina
> > A.
GratiusAvitus
> > Titus Flavius Vespasianus
> > Caius Ianus Flaminius
> > Titus Licinius Crassus
> > V Ritulia Enodiaria
> > Appius Tullius Marcellus Cato
> > Annia Ulleris Machinatrix.
> > Gallio Velius Marsallas
> > L. Vitellius Triarius
> >
> > Have by majority vote acquitted Caius Minucius Scaevola of
> Calvmniae
> >
> > The case is dismissed and all parties have my thanks for
> conducting
> > themselves as Romans.
> >
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > Praetor
> >
> > Given this the 7th day of June 2759 A.V.C. at 2:40 am Roman time
> > In the consulship of Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus and Pompeia
> Minucia
> > Strabo
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44209 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
C. Equitius Cato C. Cassio Pisoni sal.

Salve Cassius Piso.

The list of crimes possible against the Republic are found in our
tabularium.

In turn, let me ask you a question:

In the United States, in the 1850s, it was against the law for a white
person to marry a black person in many states. Because this was the
law, does that make this kind of segregation moral? Slavery was
perfectly legal in the South of the US: was it moral? Women were
denied the right to vote until AD 1920 in the US. This was the law.
Was it moral?

The answer to all these questions is "no".

You cannot state that anything that is legal must *by necessity* then
be "moral"; the law changes constantly to reflect the changes and
growth of society intellectually, philosophically, and (yes) morally.
Just because you are legally *able* to do something does not make it
the right thing to do.

I hope this makes more sense.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44210 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
---Octavius Censor:

This is how I see it....

Nobody is going to receive a lethal injection or stand before a
firing squad as a result of a Senatus Consutum Ultimum. They would
just be escorted to the door that says "EXIT"

Pompeia




In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> wrote:
>
> Cato writes:
>
> > Censor, I cannot express how much I sympathize with the *spirit*
of
> > your outrage; but it is a practice common to fascist states to
condemn
> > their citizens without trial.
>
> No one will get their head chopped off here; this is a voluntary
social
> club, and people are kicked out of such all the time without
elaborate
> procedures.
>
> Vale, O.
>
> --
> hucke@...
> http://www.graveyards.com
>
> "What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
> clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
> over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44211 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium VIII
SALVE !

Ok. No problem.

VALE,
IVL SABINVS

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus <spqr753@...> wrote:
Salve Titus Iulius Sabinus

Thank you for the request but I see no need to post anything more.

I will post the full results to the Court list so it can be seen by
the participants and stored for the archives.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetor

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Iulius Sabinus"
<iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
>
> SALVE HON. PRAETOR !
>
> Can you present, if is possible and legal, the votes results in
> figures ?
> For exemple : 7-3 or 6 -5... ?
>
> VALE,
> IVL SABINVS
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tiberius Galerius Paulinus"
> <spqr753@> wrote:
> >
> > Edictum Praetorium VIII
> >
> > Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus, Praetor
> >
> > Having been charged with service as Iudex in accordance with
the
> > Lex Salicia Ivdiciaria for the Petitio actionis of Domitius
> > Constantinus Fuscus against Caius Minucius Scaevola in which
> > Domitius Constantinus Fuscus alleged that Caius Minucius
Scaevola
> > has committed: Calvmniae (Libel and Slander)
> >
> > These Roman Citizens:
> >
> > A. Arria Carina
> > A.
GratiusAvitus
> > Titus Flavius Vespasianus
> > Caius Ianus Flaminius
> > Titus Licinius Crassus
> > V Ritulia Enodiaria
> > Appius Tullius Marcellus Cato
> > Annia Ulleris Machinatrix.
> > Gallio Velius Marsallas
> > L. Vitellius Triarius
> >
> > Have by majority vote acquitted Caius Minucius Scaevola of
> Calvmniae
> >
> > The case is dismissed and all parties have my thanks for
> conducting
> > themselves as Romans.
> >
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > Praetor
> >
> > Given this the 7th day of June 2759 A.V.C. at 2:40 am Roman time
> > In the consulship of Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus and Pompeia
> Minucia
> > Strabo
> >
>








NOVA ROMANI !
Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support page to your websites.
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm

"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44212 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
In a message dated 6/7/2006 5:50:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
hucke@... writes:
That a known Nazi would be allowed to remain here, claiming to be
a Roman citizen, long enough for a trial (which as we have seen can
take months), is a serious stain on our honour.

This Nota is, from my perspective at least, a small attempt at erasing
that stain and restoring our collective honour, by publicly repudiating
the evil in our midst.

> Slapping a pre trial nota on someone for immoralities based on stuff
> for which he/she is to be declared guilty, is like saying to
> someone 'you will have a fair trial, and then you will be
> shot'......no?

Illegal and immoral are not the same thing; they might even, under some
regimes, be orthogonal. The activities of an apologist for Hitler who,
without authorisation, creates a false association between himself, with
his evil reputation, and Nova Roma, are beyond doubt immoral.

Censor...

I agree with spirit but not the execution. The Censors are acting like
facists themselves in
this Republic. The man is not a Senator, nor do we have a general election
where he will sway a century in the near future. Observers on this list would
have to conclude that your action was for your own appeasement and not the
State's.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44213 From: rocknrockabilly Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Off topic posts
Salvete omnes,

Since we are a nation, it would be natural to discuss current
politics. Perhaps we should create a Nova Roma discussion forum for
off-topics only?

Titus Flamininus.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tiberius Galerius Paulinus"
<spqr753@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Romans
>
> I have just rejected a post that touches on WWII and macro national
> politics of a very discordant nature. Please post on Nova Roma or
> Ancient Rome as that is our focus.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Praetor
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44214 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
In a message dated 6/7/2006 9:31:49 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
pompeia_minucia_tiberia@... writes:
This is how I see it....

Nobody is going to receive a lethal injection or stand before a
firing squad as a result of a Senatus Consutum Ultimum. They would
just be escorted to the door that says "EXIT"

Pompeia

Madame President:
Well, yes in theory. Except we the BoD could have done it without
establishing a dangerous precedent. And I think that precedent was the main objection
to invoking the SCU.

Even during the Constitutional Wars of '99 a SCU was never used.

SFP
Member Board of Directors
Nova Roma INC


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44215 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN "IGNOTO"
-Salvete omnes:
you see I have given Priscus the cognomen "Ignotus" - meaning
unknown, low-born, ignorant. Please refer to him by this name so he
will not see his Nova Roman name glorified on this list. Frankly
laughter and derision is what he deserves.
If Ignotus is reallly a cowardly soul, I'd like to hear him
spout his racist beliefs with me in the middle of Tel Aviv or
Durham, NC:)
bene valete in Mente!
Marca Hortensia Maior

-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "appiusclaudiuspriscus"
<appiusclaudiuspriscus@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes!
>
> The Germanicus I wanted to follow, conquered, or more accurately,
> justly intervened between, Germans, but did not hate them.
>
> Valete!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44216 From: Claudio Guzzo Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: edict against ideas and proposal
<Salve. I write against the following edict>


EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Posted by: "Matt Hucke" hucke@... mattchicago
Tue Jun 6, 2006 6:04 am (PST)

EDICTVM CENSORIVM IN AP. CLAVDIVM PRISCVM

CENSORIAL EDICT AGAINST AP. CLAUDIUS PRISCUS

Nos Novae Romae censores hoc edictum de cive Ap. Claudio Prisco, qui
civitatem Novae Romae accepit a.d. XII Kal. Ian. MMDCCLVIII, proponunt.

Concerning citizen Appius Claudius Priscus, who joined Nova Roma on
21 December MMDCCLVIII, we the Censores of Nova Roma issue this edict.

Quia antequam civitatem Novae Romae accepit, civis Ap. Claudius Priscus
facta infra scripta peregerat suaseratque sententias quae contra
consilia publica et concordiam, ne dicamus vitam Novae Romae ipsam, in
periculum trahere videntur:

Whereas, the citizen Appius Claudius Priscus, before joining Nova
Roma, has performed the following actions and advocated positions
that are contrary to public policy and likely to endanger the harmony
or even the existence of Nova Roma:

-- Exhibuit emissionem radiophonicam de "potestate hominum cutis albae,"
auxilio et fortasse opibus societatis Partis Nationalis Socialistae
Opificum Germanorum

<Pecunia non olet...

Black Power, White Power, Green Power. To love a color or a race or a religion or something else is not forbidden. Who hates that love?>



-- produced a "White Power" radio show, sponsored by an "NSDAP"
organisation;

-- Magistratum unius e statuum Americae petivit, ratione proposita in
qua suffragia de feminis tollenda, iura liberorum suorum custodiendorum
feminis neganda,

-- run for statewide political office on a platform that advocated
the removal of voting rights for women, denying child custody rights
to women,

<Are ideas forbidden?>



et in carceribus homines e colore cutis segregandi

and the segregation of prisons;

<I cannot understand.>

Praeterea, cum civitatem Novae Romae accepit, Holocaustum Iudaeorum
fuisse negavit una cum affirmatione Hitleri coniectionem Iudaeorum in
vincula "tam recte" factum esse quam illam Roosevelti de Americanis
quorum maiores e Iaponia migravere. Deinde nudius tertius se ad Officium
Rerum Externarum regiminis Civitatum Foederatarum Americae scripsisse
agnovit, ponens partem Iraquiae Novae Romae imperatrici dandam, quod
omnibus magistratibus nostris inscitis nec probantibus factum est.

and, that since becoming a citizen of Nova Roma, he has engaged in
Holocaust denial, while simultaneously claiming that Hitler's
internment of Jews was "as right" as the actions of Roosevelt
interning Japanese-Americans.
<There are a lot of studies about that, about Jesus Christ life, about all other dogma that offend people who trust in some sacred story. A lot of people like to spend their time reading those books and, even if censors don't like it, why should we blame who has engaged in Holocaust or Christ denial? If you believe in Christ, if you are sure that so many jews gipsys and gays died because of Nazis or Stalin, if you trust in some truth why do you care about those and other denials? If my skin is black, why should I need an edict against who thinks it is white? Just a tyrannical power could pretend theese kind of trials against ideas>
Furthermore, he has admitted last week that he wrote to the
United States Government's Department of State, proposing that Nova Roma be
given control of a portion of Iraq.

<Funny. Who should go there and take control that army can't give? What portion? It would be cool to hear what that Government will say>

This was done without the knowledge or
permission of any magistrate of Nova Roma.

<Who needs a permission to give to you the right that you can refuse? Please, let me know what Bush will say. Imagine he says: ok cow boys, we go home and give the control of a portion of Iraq to Nova Roma; what will Nova Roma say? May be: NO THANKS, NR don't ratify what Priscus did. Is there some Nova Roman that want to go there? May be Priscus wants to. Why should we stop him from doing it? Nova Roma could ratify what an hero could do over there for peace between people. Falsus procurator is not a criminal but someone who give to the falsus mandator the opportunity of get a business. Nova Roma should decide if ratifying or not, before everything else, now that we know that proposal!>

Credimus veri simile esse Ap. Claudium Priscum nomine vero suo
cottidiano Regimini Civitatum Foederatarum Americae hominem probabiliter
periculosum notum esse. Scribendo ad Officium Rerum Externarum,
communitatem falsam inter se et Novam Romam finxit, quo nos periculo
indagationis obiecit.

We believe it likely that Appius Claudius Priscus, under his true
name, is known to the United States Government as a potentially
dangerous individual. By writing to the State Department, he has
created a false association between himself and Nova Roma, thereby
exposing us to investigation.
<I am not afraid of an investigation, because I am not a criminal. Are you? Why do you feel exposed? Censores should be over any suspect, but this edict is ambiguous.>


E paragrapho IV. A. 1. Constitutionis Novae Romae, censoribus potestas
officiumque est: "mores publicos honoremque per notas collegiales
proponendas sospites servant. In unum e multis, nota sat est ut ius
suffragiorum ferendorum amittat dum tollatur. "

According to the Constitution of Nova Roma, IV.A.1., the Censores
have the power and obligation:
"To safeguard the public morality and honor through the collegial
administering of /nota/; A nota against an ordinary individual is
sufficient to deprive that individual of the right to vote until such
time as it is removed;."
<Is there any kind of sanction against censores if they are wrong?>
Ex hoc, nos Censores Ap. Claudium Priscum damnant, repudiant, notantque,
et in eum hanc notam edicunt, eum iure suffragiorum ferendorum in
suffragiis Novae Romae omnibus privantes. Haec nota per spatium munerum
nostrorum reliquum valebit, sed edicto censorum futurorum renovetur.

We, the Censores, do hereby condemn, repudiate, and censure Appius
Claudius Priscus, and issue this NOTA upon him, depriving him of the
right to vote in any Nova Roma election. This Nota shall remain in
effect for the remainder of our terms in office, but may be renewed
by edict of future Censores.
<How could Priscus could act against this nota and its damages and harms?>
Gn. Equitius Marinus, Censor.
M. Octavius Germanicus Censor.
ante diem VIII Id. IVNIAS MMDCCLIX a.u.c.
<Appius Claudius Cicero. Citizen and advocate.>
--
hucke@... - http://www.graveyards.com

"A cactolith is a quasihorizontal chonolith composed of anastomosing
ductoliths whose distal ends curl like a harpolith, thin like a
sphenolith, or bulge discordantly like an akmolith or ethmolith."
(from _Geology and Geography of the Henry Mountains Region, Utah_)



<ingirumimusnocteetconsumimurigni>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44217 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Off topic posts
Salve Titus Flamininus

The key phrase in my post was "of a very discordant nature".

At least to my mind.


vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetor


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rocknrockabilly"
<franceuropa@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Since we are a nation, it would be natural to discuss current
> politics. Perhaps we should create a Nova Roma discussion forum
for
> off-topics only?
>
> Titus Flamininus.
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tiberius Galerius Paulinus"
> <spqr753@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Romans
> >
> > I have just rejected a post that touches on WWII and macro
national
> > politics of a very discordant nature. Please post on Nova Roma
or
> > Ancient Rome as that is our focus.
> >
> > Vale
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > Praetor
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44218 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
SALVE CATO!

Right now I'm restudying very carefully a Tabularium to make sure if I'm in the association which is morally acceptable!
You said that the law changes constantly to reflect the changes and growth of society intellectually, philosophically and yes morally. I couldn´t agree more with you! However, maybe my sarcasm was misunderstood... maybe it´s more greek than roman...
My question is: Does the law of Nova Roma correspond to the reality. If not, we are a simple role playing game!
How many members of nazi-groups, ku klux klan, misogynists etc. do we need before "our" law changes intellectually, philosophically and yes morally?
I´m a simple military man with my convictions about the right and wrong. From now on I leave gladly any debate of law, morallity and virtues for those who can spend a whole day in philosopfical hair-splitting on the main list, blind before the threat and immorallity. If that is the way to carry on with Nova Roma, I can imagine the fall...

Vale et valete
Gaius Cassius Piso


gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> escreveu:
C. Equitius Cato C. Cassio Pisoni sal.

Salve Cassius Piso.

The list of crimes possible against the Republic are found in our
tabularium.

In turn, let me ask you a question:

In the United States, in the 1850s, it was against the law for a white
person to marry a black person in many states. Because this was the
law, does that make this kind of segregation moral? Slavery was
perfectly legal in the South of the US: was it moral? Women were
denied the right to vote until AD 1920 in the US. This was the law.
Was it moral?

The answer to all these questions is "no".

You cannot state that anything that is legal must *by necessity* then
be "moral"; the law changes constantly to reflect the changes and
growth of society intellectually, philosophically, and (yes) morally.
Just because you are legally *able* to do something does not make it
the right thing to do.

I hope this makes more sense.

Vale bene,

Cato





__________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44219 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Senatus Consultum de Re Publica Defendenda
Salve Romans

FYI

from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senatus_consultum_ultimum"


"Senatus consultum ultimum ("Ultimate decree of the Senate"), or
more properly, senatus consultum de re publica defendenda ("Decree
of the Senate on defending the Republic") is the modern term (based
on Caesar's wording at Bel. Civ. 1.5) given to a decree of the Roman
Senate during the late Roman Republic passed in times of emergency.
The form was usually consules darent operam ne quid detrimenti
respublica caperet ("let the consuls see to it that the state suffer
no harm"). It was first passed during the rise to power of the
younger of the Gracchi in 121 BC, and subsequently at several other
points, including during Lepidus' march on Rome in 77 BC, the
Conspiracy of Catiline in 63, and finally when Julius Caesar crossed
the Rubicon in 49. The SCU effectively replaced the disused
dictatorship, by giving the magistrates semi-dictatorial powers to
preserve the State. After the rise of the Principate, there was
little need for the Senate to issue the decree again."

Constitutional Problem With the SCU

"Implicit controversy, however, lay inherent in the brevity of the
decree: it did not enumerate just how far-reaching those powers
would be for consuls, and whether they overrode normal protections
and liberties citizens enjoyed. This came to a head in 63, when
Marcus Tullius Cicero used the senatus consultum ultimum as a means
to carry out extra-judicial executions of men charged with
complicity in the Conspiracy of Catiline, including the former
consul Publius Cornelius Lentulus Sura.

"In normal times, only a vote of the Assembly of Citizens could
condemn a man to death inside the City of Rome. Cicero believed and
argued that, given the extraordinary danger of the crisis, the
consultum afforded him the power in that limited circumstance."

"Gaius Julius Caesar and others argued that the consultum could not
override the basic laws of the Roman state, that it meant merely
that the Consuls should do their utmost within the framework of the
Roman Constitution to resolve the emergency. The matter of law would
never be settled, although Cicero would be exiled in 58 because of
the executions (the exile was ordered by one of his political
enemies, Publius Clodius Pulcher, and therefore should probably not
be seen as a completely valid response)."


The use of the Senatus consultum ultimum by the last generation of
the Roman Republic was a major reason for it being the last
generation of the Roman Republic.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44220 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: Off topic posts
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica T. Flaminio quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae
> voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Since we are a nation, it would be natural to discuss current
> politics.
>
> ATS: Not here. Magistrates and their assistants must read everything
> here unless marked offtopic; we don¹t have to know about Nazi Germany or what
> have you. Most of us already know about that. Interesting, perhaps, but not
> appropriate here. Moreover, U.S. politics have limited appeal for people in,
> say, Finland or Hungary, just as the reverse is true; national politics are
> not necessarily interesting to those interested in ancient Rome. Secondly,
> many people have limited mailboxes, and some at least have to pay for
> connection to the net by the minute. It is unfair to them to be forced to pay
> for material unrelated to the subject for which they have subscribed, or for
> their mailboxes to be jammed with unwanted material...including the new,
> expanded version of advertising which Yahoo is now appending to our posts when
> one hits reply; please snip this (and ALL irrelevant material) out of courtesy
> to others. It might be a good idea to re-read that moderation edictum, too;
> the praetores regulate the ML, and if one or both of them feel that a reminder
> is necessary, it is their privilege to issue one.
>
>
>
> Perhaps we should create a Nova Roma discussion forum for
> off-topics only?
>
> ATS: We have one. Several, in fact. The provincial lists can handle
> macro politics within a country (given, that the US and Canada do not have
> unified provincial lists; Canada has two and the US has many), and there are
> other places for other discussions suitable for the over-35 crowd.
>
> Titus Flamininus.
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Tiberius Galerius Paulinus"
> <spqr753@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Salve Romans
>> >
>> > I have just rejected a post that touches on WWII and macro national
>> > politics of a very discordant nature. Please post on Nova Roma or
>> > Ancient Rome as that is our focus.
>> >
>> > Vale
>> >
>> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>> > Praetor
>> >



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44221 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
C. Equitius Cato C. Cassio Pisoni sal.

Salve Cassius Piso.

I think that you will find the tabularium of Nova Roma quite in tune
with the reality of an attempt to restore a Roman Republic. The lex
Constitutiva ("Constitution") of the Republic says that (among other
rights) citizens of the Republic have

"Complete authority over their own personal and household rites,
rituals, and beliefs, pagan or otherwise; except where this
Constitution mandates participation in the rites of the Religio
Romana, such as the case of magistrates and Senators;
The right and obligation to remain subject to the civil rights and
laws of the countries in which they reside and/or hold citizenship,
regardless of their status as dual citizens of Nova Roma" (lex
Constitutiva II.B.1-2

As a citizen of the United States, Claudius Priscus retains the right
to freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution of that country.
Our lex Constitutiva upholds that right. No matter how repugnant his
beliefs are, he has the right to hold them. As soon as you begin
deciding what citizens can or cannot think --- as soon as you begin
"criminalizing" thought and expression and speech --- you begin the
rapid transformation from a free society into despotism, autocracy,
and fascism.

The Republic has adopted, and has committed itself to upholding, the
freedoms that open, democratic, free societies in the world enjoy
today. The censors are correct to protect those freedoms. But it is
not philosophical "hairsplitting" to argue that what is "moral" is not
necessarily the same thing as what is "legal".

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44222 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: A REQUEST TO THE CENSORS
M. Hortensia Censoribus spd;
as a civis and especially in my status as a minority that he
reviles, Judaeae, I request M. Octavius Germanicus and Gn. Equitius
Marinus in their capacity as Censors of Nova Roma to bestow an
appropriate cognomen on App. Claudius Priscus.
It distresses me to see him bear a noble name & it mentioned in the
forum; let his name reflect his true nature. Let the people mock him.
bene vale in Mente (mens)
Marca Hortensia Maior,
proud Judaean Nova Roman
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44223 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: A REQUEST TO THE CENSORS
Request denied.

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS

Maior <rory12001@...> writes:

> M. Hortensia Censoribus spd;
> as a civis and especially in my status as a minority that he
> reviles, Judaeae, I request M. Octavius Germanicus and Gn. Equitius
> Marinus in their capacity as Censors of Nova Roma to bestow an
> appropriate cognomen on App. Claudius Priscus.
> It distresses me to see him bear a noble name & it mentioned in the
> forum; let his name reflect his true nature. Let the people mock him.
> bene vale in Mente (mens)
> Marca Hortensia Maior,
> proud Judaean Nova Roman
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44224 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
<And this one is a German by descent, and will not perpetuate,
<tolerate, or sanction the evil perpetrated by my people in the
<past.
<- Octavius.

Ah, but you're a Roman at heart, Pater!

Vale,
DOA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44225 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: New Provisional Citizen
Salve Paulinus,

> Well I got my wife to join Nova Roma.

Ha ha!! It's about time! We've been hearing about the mrs. for years and it would be nice to say
hello to her personally!!
Vale,
Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44226 From: appiusclaudiuspriscus Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: I've posted my defense.
Salvete omnes,

Judge Consul Modianus said the trial would be today; I have to go home
now (I don't have internet at home), so a few minutes after 5PM CDT, I
posted my defense although Tribunus Astur hadn't posted his offense
yet. If anyone would like a copy of the defense straight from me
(it's a Microsoft Word file 10 pp. long), I'll consider your request!

Valete,
Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44227 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: A REQUEST TO THE CENSORS
In a message dated 6/7/2006 2:08:45 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
rory12001@... writes:
as a civis and especially in my status as a minority that he
reviles, Judaeae, I request M. Octavius Germanicus and Gn. Equitius
Marinus in their capacity as Censors of Nova Roma to bestow an
appropriate cognomen on App. Claudius Priscus.

As what? "Jew Hater?" Isn't this a little incendary even for you, Maior?

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44228 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIUM IN AP. CLAUDIUM PRISCUM
Salvete omnes.

What we do here will inevitably set a precedent, one way or the
other, and there is a wider issue to consider. In the expressed
desire that this should have been resolved expeditiously, we risk
straying too far down the path of "do whatever it takes". The end
however cannot justify the means, if the means rip a hole in our
basic safeguards.

These safeguards are not "elaborate procedures", but very basic
rights common to all of us. Neither should people simply
be "escorted to the door that says "EXIT" under the authority of a
Senatus Consutum Ultimum (SCU), without the circumstances being so
dire as to warrant a suspension of our rights, for when the rights
of one are suspended then the rights of all are at risk, by setting
inappropriate precedents.

Currently there is absolutely no explicit legal provision that I can
find, that either forbids a person holding certain views from
becoming a citizen, or that provides for their expulsion for holding
such beliefs. Indeed the Constitution states in Section II.A.3-4:

3. Citizenship is open to anyone regardless of ethnic heritage,
gender, religious affiliation, or sexual orientation.

4. Citizenship may be involuntarily revoked by those means that
shall be established by law, or may be voluntarily relinquished by
notification of the censors or by public statement before three or
more witnesses.

The Censors can obviously exercise discretion prior to granting
citizenship. Citizenship of Nova Roma is a privilege, not a right
that anyone who knocks on these doors can automatically claim. Once
a person has been granted citizenship though they are entitled to
the protection of our laws, for however odious we may find a
particular view, if we start to create lists of circumstances when
those rights can be stripped away without due process, we diminish
ourselves. Equally there is no legal requirement to disclose prior
to citizenship being granted, macronational political affiliations,
so one cannot justifiably claim that failure automatically nullifies
the grant of citizenship.

It can, and moreover must only, be the law that determines whether a
citizen is expelled from our community and if the law is silent on
whether holding extremist macronational views is sufficient grounds
for expulsion, then the suggestion that a person should be ejected
for those views is one being made on moral grounds.

While many will not quibble over the example in front of us, the
lack of protest is due simply to the nature of the views held. The
repugnance that people feel makes it easy to justify allowing
morality and not law to decide whether to expel, but regardless of
those views it is equally important that the methods we use to deal
with this situation are based on the collective will of the people,
as expressed through the law, rather than the collective will of
magistrates, regardless of how many are in agreement.

There are two principal reasons why this is important. Firstly
expulsion of a citizen is a matter that should concern the whole
community in order to prevent abuse by magistrates It is too great a
power to leave in the hands of magistrates, but the current case
makes it easy for some people to be blinded to the obvious dangers
that accrue from following such a policy, but they still exist.

It is a dangerous precedent to allow magistrates to determine
that "X" view is so morally repugnant and being a figure publicly
associated with that view, is justification for expulsion. With
different magistrates and different circumstances that precedent
could be used to maliciously expel citizens whose views, whether on
a macronational or Nova Roman level, were held to be taboo or
subversive. None of us have a crystal ball and we cannot see how
Nova Roma will develop or the flash points that may arise inside
its "walls". To place such draconian power into the hands of
magistrates, albeit legally, is I contend a very bad precedent, and
one that one day maybe repeated to far less public acclaim than now.

The SCU would have been a valid and appropriate tool, had the danger
been extraordinary and the normal processes available unsuited to
deal with the circumstances. That, to me at least, was never clearly
established. Yes, the SCU would have been legal, but it is not the
*law*, It is just a tool of the law, a malleable administrative
process that can be shaped to deal with unique and unusual
circumstances. That malleability is both its strength and weakness,
since it could all too easily be abused. Any organization that
places ultimate authority in the hands of the people
(notwithstanding the supremacy of the constitution which can be
legally overturned by the people) and sets itself forth as
a "society" based on law, simply must not allow the delegation of
such extreme powers.

The Constitution in Section II.A.4 clearly establishes that the
involuntarily revoking of citizenship must be as laid down by law,
so the baseline is a legal rather than moral judgment. The law
cannot always provide for every circumstance, but this circumstance
is not so unusual and unpredictable. Is this, when one strips away
the emotive response, so peculiar an occurrence that required the
passing of an SCU? The SCU can only be said to very indirectly meet
the test of the constitution requiring a process established by law
to revoke citizenship. It certainly is not within the *normal*
spirit of law, being of course an extraordinary measure.

Legally this is a case of what was *done* combined with what the
person *is*, yet some are comfortable with using what he *is* as
solely grounds for expulsion, as is clear from the comments on this
list. Exiling this man for what he thinks and says outside of Nova
Roma may not disturb many, but we should be concerned about
diverging from the due process of law, to instead rendering moral
judgments that lead to exile. A moral judgment that leads to a nota
being issued is quite different from one that leads to termination
of citizenship, but already I see the lines of distinction starting
to blur here.

If what a man *is*, especially what he *is* in the macronational
world, can be used as a yardstick for deciding on exile from Nova
Roma, then we should enshrine such restrictions in our law, lest we
lay the first stone in a path to the land of arbitrary judgments
based on personal beliefs and prejudices. Universal agreement and
condemnation of what a person *is* does not justify setting foot on
this road, since laws are decided by due process, not crafted to
echo the views of a lynch mob.

The second reason why it is important that the people should have a
voice in these matters, be it in assembly or through representatives
of the body politic picked to hear the matter in a trial, is that
where a judgment is required on what someone *did* combined with
what he *is*, then the community should be seen to set the standard.
Any judgment or decision that results in expulsion that is based
partly on a moral basis (what he *did* when combined with what he
*is*) should be made by the community, the people. It invests the
final decision with greater authority, both legally and as a by-
product morally too.

To be clear, I am not saying that anyone who has had conduct of this
issue in a magisterial manner has erred, rather that in the zeal to
quickly purge Nova Roma of what is judged to be a danger we risk
demolishing some inherent safeguards and opening the door to future
abuses.

If people are to be proscribed for who they *are*, what they think
and what they may do to Nova Roma, (as opposed to what they have
done), then we should enshrine such restrictions in law. To fail to
do so opens the door to the very abuse that we seek to condemn. The
easy route is to hedge and fudge and ignore the principle of the
rule of law as inconvenient or inappropriate in the circumstances.
The harder route is to stay true to the principle of the rule of
law, even if that means according rights to those we think unworthy,
such as the right to trial and rebuttal, in anything but the most
extreme of circumstances.

Valete
Cn. Iulius Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> ---Octavius Censor:
>
> This is how I see it....
>
> Nobody is going to receive a lethal injection or stand before a
> firing squad as a result of a Senatus Consutum Ultimum. They
would
> just be escorted to the door that says "EXIT"
>
> Pompeia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44229 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
EDICTUM CONSULARE
Ex Officio

On Fascism

In recent times, some groups, out of a mistaken understanding of Roman
history, and wishing to acquire for their ideologies a false pedigree
of antiquity have adopted certain symbols of Roma Antiqua, as, for
example, the "fasces."

While respecting individual rights to hold any belief freely, I, as a
Consul of Nova Roma, condemn all racist and fascist ideologies and any
ideology that diminishes the rights or status of any citizen based on
such factors as creed, gender, ethnic heritage or sexual orientation.
At no time should the use or adoption of any symbol of Roma Antiqua by
Nova Roma be construed or understood to imply acceptance of or
adherence to any such doctrine by the Res Publica Novae Romae.

These doctrines being inimical to our Res Publica, any citizen who
publicly, either at an official Nova Roma event or electronic forum,
associates Nova Roma with such doctrines shall be in violation of the
principles in which Nova Roma was founded and at the discretion of the
Praetor warrant prosecution under our appropriate Laws.

ante diem VI Id. IVNIAS MMDCCLIX a.u.c.

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44230 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On the Priorities of Nova Roma
EDICTUM CONSULARE
Ex Officio

On the Priorities of Nova Roma

I hereby reaffirm, as Consul, the priorities of Nova Roma established
by the Senate on 31 August 2757 and encourage the citizenry of Nova
Roma to be mindful that the purpose of Nova Roma is ultimately for our
citizens to cultivate an understanding and appreciation of Roma
antiqua while working to establish a modern Civitas. I encourage the
Senate, my fellow Magistrates, and the People of Nova Roma to be
mindful that all other activities have the potential to take away from
our goal to establish a modern Roman community.

PRIORITIES FOR NOVA ROMA IN ORDER OF PRECEDENCE

The Senate finds that the following items are all priorities for Nova
Roma. They are hereby established as such, in order of precedence.
This precedence shall not be interpreted to indicate that any item is
unimportant. All are priorities. The sole reason for assigning
precedence is to better focus resources and effort.

I. The Religio Romana; it's promotion, preservation, protection, and
diffusion throughout the communities of Nova Roma.

II. Establishment of a Nova Roma Endowment and its long term growth.

III. Sustaining support of existing projects, including the
publication of the Eagle, the Aedilian Fund for the Magna Mater
Project, the Scholarship Fund, and the Land Fund.

IV. Outreach, recruitment and retention of citizens, including
fostering interest in the activities of the Sodalities.

V. Promotion of Local Group activities.

VI. Encouraging citizens to become involved in the work of government

ante diem VI Id. IVNIAS MMDCCLIX a.u.c.

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44231 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Representing Nova Roma
EDICTUM CONSULARE
Ex Officio

On Representing Nova Roma

I issue this Edict to address to the people of Nova Roma that no
citizen, or group of citizens, shall contact any organization,
association, fellowship, government, or any group of people with the
intention of representing Nova Roma, or using the name Nova Roma, in
an attempt to establish a link between themselves, Nova Roma, and the
entity they are in contact with unless, and only if, they are
empowered by the Senate or the Laws of Nova Roma.

Authorized actions include, but are not limited to, Provincial
Governors contacting a local Park to have a gathering, the Curatrix
Aerarii dealing with our financial institutions, the Magister
Aranearius dealing with an Internet service provider, etc…

Citizens of Nova Roma who wish to contact an outside group (i.e.,
another organization, association, fellowship, government, etc…)
should contact their Provincial Governor, or one of the Consuls or
Praetors to verify if their action is acceptable.

A direct violation of this Edict can, at the discretion of the
Praetors, warrant prosecution under our appropriate Laws.

ante diem VI Id. IVNIAS MMDCCLIX a.u.c.

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44232 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Regarding Appius Claudius Priscus
EDICTUM CONSULARE
Ex Officio

Regarding Appius Claudius Priscus

The actions of Appius Claudius Priscus have been questioned, scorned,
and deemed inappropriate by many citizens within Nova Roma myself
included. Much debate has transpired that has caused many among us,
myself included, to focus our most precious asset – time – into
prosecuting Appius Claudius Priscus and/or devoting much of our
attention to him and his status within Nova Roma.

I have been in the process of establishing a trial against Appius
Claudius Priscus, of which I established myself as the presiding
magistrate. I support the Nota issued against Appius Claudius
Priscus, by the Censors, and honor their right to safeguard the public
morality. I am of the belief that the Nota is sufficient to safeguard
Nova Roma from any potential damage that Appius Claudius Priscus may
cause Nova Roma based on his previous actions of having contacted
United States government officials/agencies. Additionally I have
issued an Edict (On Representing Nova Roma) regarding anyone
attempting to represent Nova Roma without proper authorization to do
such. All of the above being the case I am terminating the trial
against Appius Claudius Priscus.

I encourage citizen Appius Claudius Priscus to learn about our laws
and to correct the actions described in the Nota issued by the
Censors, and to strive for the proper execution of the virtues
esteemed by Roman tradition by proper conduct on our electronic
message boards and live forums. I recommend that future Censors
re-evaluation the behavior of citizen Appius Claudius Priscus in the
future to determine if the Nota is still necessary.

In my dismissal of the trial against citizen Appius Claudius Priscus I
have advised (and highly recommended against) the Praetors from
entertaining a petitio actionis against Appius Claudius Priscus unless
he violates our laws from this moment in time forward. At this point
I see no reason to give citizen Appius Claudius Priscus a forum with
which he can extol his beliefs and agenda.

ante diem VI Id. IVNIAS MMDCCLIX a.u.c.

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44233 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: New Provisional Citizen
Slavete omnes,

Thank you all for your warm welcome to NR! I look foward to
participating in NR and especially in our province. I shall be going
through all the lists and vist the sodalistas with a particular eye on
the cooking one!

All the best!

Vibia Lucretia Camilla
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44234 From: Tita Artoria Marcella Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Regarding Appius Claudius Priscus
Salvete omnes,

Consul Modianus scripsit:

>All of the above being the case I am terminating the trial
>against Appius Claudius Priscus.

I made a vow, albeit not to the gods, that if Appius Claudius Priscus were to survive his trial and remain a citizen, I would relinquish my own citizenship. I feel that strongly about his presence among us. After he published his alternative e-mail is was easy enough to learn his past and beliefs, and tonight his defense arguments made me want to vomit.

Consul, I do not understand your decision, but I respect it. The choice is now mine as to whether to pretend Priscus no longer is a part of NR, or to do as my conscience dictates and renounce my citizenship. Tonight I am still in shock. Hopefully tomorrow will bring an answer.

Valete,
Artoria Marcella

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44235 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-07
Subject: Re: New Provisional Citizen
Salve Vibia Lucretia;
let me add my welcome to others. Actually Mexico Provincia is
very active so who knows one day you could persuade the Canadia
Provincia Nova Romans to have a nice meeting down there in all that
sunshine:)
bene vale
Marca Hortensia Maior>
> Slavete omnes,
>
> Thank you all for your warm welcome to NR! I look foward to
> participating in NR and especially in our province. I shall be going
> through all the lists and vist the sodalistas with a particular eye
on
> the cooking one!
>
> All the best!
>
> Vibia Lucretia Camilla
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44236 From: Decimus Valerius Thomas Brunus Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Arriving
Fellow Citizens,

In a brief note, I'd like to inform you all about my arrival in Nova Roma.
Within what concerns my neo-roman (is this right?) citizenship, I intend and
expect to work, if possible, in politics, government, legislation,
translation (EN-PT-EN) and basic web designing.

I'm from a state in southern Brazil called Rio Grande do Sul, I'm taking a
History degree and I'm serving through the compulsory military service as a
soldier in the Brazilian Army. My MSN is in_ulaer@.... Feel free to
add me. ;-)

I have, by the way, already requested my association to the Province I shall
live.

That would be all for now.

Thank you,

Decimus Valerius Thomas Brunus






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44237 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Regarding Appius Claudius Priscus
In any large group of people it will be possible to find some who believe
all sorts of things. Many beliefs will be benign and some objectionable.
But if this is an example of how many citizens feel, then perhaps the senate
should pass laws restricting membership and providing for the revocation of
membership of those whose views are considered beyond what is acceptable in
polite Roman society.

But be careful when you seek to peer into men's souls. You may not enjoy
what you find.
--
>|P. Dominus Antonius|<
Tony Dah m

Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius
Islam religio pacis, nex omnibus dissentint.


On 6/7/06, Tita Artoria Marcella <icehunter@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Consul Modianus scripsit:
> >All of the above being the case I am terminating the trial
> >against Appius Claudius Priscus.
>
> I made a vow, albeit not to the gods, that if Appius Claudius Priscus were
> to survive his trial and remain a citizen, I would relinquish my own
> citizenship. I feel that strongly about his presence among us. After he
> published his alternative e-mail is was easy enough to learn his past and
> beliefs, and tonight his defense arguments made me want to vomit.
>
> Consul, I do not understand your decision, but I respect it. The choice is
> now mine as to whether to pretend Priscus no longer is a part of NR, or to
> do as my conscience dictates and renounce my citizenship. Tonight I am still
> in shock. Hopefully tomorrow will bring an answer.
>
> Valete,
> Artoria Marcella
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44238 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On the Priorities of Nova Roma
So the Religio Romana is the number one priority and the other priorities
are financing, publishing, recruitment and retention, local activities, and
participation.

May I point out that the first priority is essentially the only priority.
All the others are in service to this single over arching priority. None of
the other priorities are actually ends in themselves they are merely means
to an end, and apparently the only end is the Religio Romana.

Does Nova Roma no longer have any greater vision, and no greater
aspirations? Has it really been reduced to a mere social club for the
promotion of a particular variety of paganism?

I find that sad.
--
>|P. Dominus Antonius|<
Tony Dah m

Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius
Islam religio pacis, nex omnibus dissentint.

On 6/7/06, David Kling (Modianus) <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> EDICTUM CONSULARE
> Ex Officio
>
> On the Priorities of Nova Roma
>
> I hereby reaffirm, as Consul, the priorities of Nova Roma established
> by the Senate on 31 August 2757 and encourage the citizenry of Nova
> Roma to be mindful that the purpose of Nova Roma is ultimately for our
> citizens to cultivate an understanding and appreciation of Roma
> antiqua while working to establish a modern Civitas. I encourage the
> Senate, my fellow Magistrates, and the People of Nova Roma to be
> mindful that all other activities have the potential to take away from
> our goal to establish a modern Roman community.
>
> PRIORITIES FOR NOVA ROMA IN ORDER OF PRECEDENCE
>
> The Senate finds that the following items are all priorities for Nova
> Roma. They are hereby established as such, in order of precedence.
> This precedence shall not be interpreted to indicate that any item is
> unimportant. All are priorities. The sole reason for assigning
> precedence is to better focus resources and effort.
>
> I. The Religio Romana; it's promotion, preservation, protection, and
> diffusion throughout the communities of Nova Roma.
>
> II. Establishment of a Nova Roma Endowment and its long term growth.
>
> III. Sustaining support of existing projects, including the
> publication of the Eagle, the Aedilian Fund for the Magna Mater
> Project, the Scholarship Fund, and the Land Fund.
>
> IV. Outreach, recruitment and retention of citizens, including
> fostering interest in the activities of the Sodalities.
>
> V. Promotion of Local Group activities.
>
> VI. Encouraging citizens to become involved in the work of government
>
> ante diem VI Id. IVNIAS MMDCCLIX a.u.c.
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
> Consul
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44239 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On the Priorities of Nova Roma
>
> Does Nova Roma no longer have any greater vision, and no greater
> aspirations? Has it really been reduced to a mere social club for
the
> promotion of a particular variety of paganism?
>
> I find that sad.
> --

Slavete omnes,

Well we have had up to two thousand souls at one time before. I hate
sounding like a parrot sometimes repeating posts off and on but Nova
Roma is only ever going to be what her citizens put into her. I find
she is like most cultural organizations I am familiar with. All have
one thing in common and that is more often than not only a small
handful out of hundreds or even thousands form the backbone of the
organization and always stick with it year after year come thick or
thin. The majority always will go along for the ride, show up for
events or parties but that is about it; yet woh betide the faithful
administration if the hopes and dreams of the many observing the
very few doing all the work are not realized.

In Nova Roma, even before with 2000+ souls only 10 - 20% contributed
their yearly 10.00 US tax. Figure it; with 2 or 3000 dollars tax
collect per year, how the hell does one expect to build a temple or
small Vatican sized state when 200,000 dollars is the average asking
price for even a borderline hovel in much of metroplotitan North
America? Furthermore, we are supposed to be better educating
ourselves in the religion, arts, history and Latin language but not
that many are willing or do not have the time to take on and
complete free courses here. On another list one of our citizens
pointed out 80% of our population left since they saw no realization
of tangible dreams and went on to say that it was Romulus' personal
dream to drive to get Rome going so he started the city itself
picking up brick by brick on his own. Well obviously there were some
willing to catch on to his leadership and give him a hand since Rome
quickly became a reality but I don't believe too many took off or
melted away into the barbarian wilderness when they were given tasks
or responsibilities starting with making the cement to drawing up
the first laws or taking the responsibilities of magistrates of the
city.

Nova Roma's success will depend in future on each of her citizens
and she'll only give out what we are willing to put into her as
indivduals. Its really something we should all think about.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44240 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: New Provisional Citizen
Salve Camilla!

<Thank you all for your warm welcome to NR! I look foward to
<participating in NR and especially in our province. I shall be going
<through all the lists and vist the sodalistas with a particular eye on
<the cooking one!

It's nice that you are here!! We've been hearing nice things about you for years so it is almost
like we know you already :-) Your hubby is quite proud of you!
And.... we've heard about your Mexican cooking skills, which makes me wish that I lived in your
neighborhood and not across the Atlantic Ocean!!

Vale,
Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44241 From: Gnaeus Salvius Astur Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Rescindo petitionem actionis
CN·SALVIVS·ASTVR·QVIRITIBVS·S·P·D

S·V·B·E·E·V

After discussing the issue with several magistrates, and after having
been assured that it is in the best interest of Nova Roma that this
trial does not continue, I hereby rescind the petitio actionis I
presented against Ap. Claudius Priscus. I will let those magistrates
whose responsibility it is handle this case as they wish.

Let me say, however, that this has been an excellent opportunity to
test our judiciary system. I have seen that it can indeed work
properly, although, as one would expect, some details need some
polishing.

For example, I have realized that it would be much wiser for the actor
and the reus to agree (or agree to disagree) on the list of judices on
a chatroom, rather than through e-mail - something that now takes
several days of sending e-mails back and fourth would be solved in
only a few minutes. In the same way, it would be much wiser to hear
the declaration of witnesses in that way, instead of through e-mail.
We have also learnt that *everyone* on the tribunal list should be
under moderation except the magistrate that handles the process, and
that the actor and the reus should only be allowed to speak once at
each stage of the process, to stop the trial becoming a common mailing
list flame war.

These things might seem self-evident, but those are precisely the kind
of things one doesn't really see until one tries to actually make the
system work. :-)

I don't know how these ideas should be recorded. The law left these
details for the instructing magistrate to decide, and I think that it
should be left that way. Maybe a praetorial edictum defining these
procedures would be better than changing the law, although a few
tweakings with the current text wouldn't be a bad idea. I'll take the
time to meditate this and come back with a proposal.

CVRATE·VT·VALEATIS

CN·SALVIVS·T·F·A·NEP·OVF·ASTVR·SCRIPSIT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44242 From: flavius leviticus Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On the Priorities of Nova Roma
Salve Modianus,I hereby make it publicaly known that I support you in your giving of the Religeo Romana your number one priority within Nova Roma.There has been much talk about the high moral standards of our Nation of Nova Roma.I feel that the Religeo Romana is the moral flagship of our Nation and should always be so.To be a citizen of this great Nation is to extol our Religeo and its high moral standards and Virtues to the world.At the very least to respect it in every regard.We deny not others who have other religeous preferences from becoming citizens and enjoying all the rights and benefits of Roman Citizenship as was the case in Roma Antigua excepting those that were enemies of the State.I resent the Religeo Romana being refered to a pagan social club and its implication that we are somehow on the lunatic fringe.Salvete Omnes,Appius Galerius Aurelianus.Semper Fidelis!

"P. Dominus Antonius" <marsvigilia@...> wrote: So the Religio Romana is the number one priority and the other priorities
are financing, publishing, recruitment and retention, local activities, and
participation.

May I point out that the first priority is essentially the only priority.
All the others are in service to this single over arching priority. None of
the other priorities are actually ends in themselves they are merely means
to an end, and apparently the only end is the Religio Romana.

Does Nova Roma no longer have any greater vision, and no greater
aspirations? Has it really been reduced to a mere social club for the
promotion of a particular variety of paganism?

I find that sad.
--
>|P. Dominus Antonius|<
Tony Dah m

Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius
Islam religio pacis, nex omnibus dissentint.

On 6/7/06, David Kling (Modianus) <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> EDICTUM CONSULARE
> Ex Officio
>
> On the Priorities of Nova Roma
>
> I hereby reaffirm, as Consul, the priorities of Nova Roma established
> by the Senate on 31 August 2757 and encourage the citizenry of Nova
> Roma to be mindful that the purpose of Nova Roma is ultimately for our
> citizens to cultivate an understanding and appreciation of Roma
> antiqua while working to establish a modern Civitas. I encourage the
> Senate, my fellow Magistrates, and the People of Nova Roma to be
> mindful that all other activities have the potential to take away from
> our goal to establish a modern Roman community.
>
> PRIORITIES FOR NOVA ROMA IN ORDER OF PRECEDENCE
>
> The Senate finds that the following items are all priorities for Nova
> Roma. They are hereby established as such, in order of precedence.
> This precedence shall not be interpreted to indicate that any item is
> unimportant. All are priorities. The sole reason for assigning
> precedence is to better focus resources and effort.
>
> I. The Religio Romana; it's promotion, preservation, protection, and
> diffusion throughout the communities of Nova Roma.
>
> II. Establishment of a Nova Roma Endowment and its long term growth.
>
> III. Sustaining support of existing projects, including the
> publication of the Eagle, the Aedilian Fund for the Magna Mater
> Project, the Scholarship Fund, and the Land Fund.
>
> IV. Outreach, recruitment and retention of citizens, including
> fostering interest in the activities of the Sodalities.
>
> V. Promotion of Local Group activities.
>
> VI. Encouraging citizens to become involved in the work of government
>
> ante diem VI Id. IVNIAS MMDCCLIX a.u.c.
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
> Consul
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44243 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On the Priorities of Nova Roma
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Appio Galerio Aureliano salutem dicit

Please keep in mind that those priorities I mentioned were approved by the
Senate of Nova Roma under the Consulship of Gnaeus Equitius Marinus and
Gnaeus Salvius Astur and I am simply reaffirming them and reminding the
citizenry that these are the established goals set by the Senate of Nova
Roma. I cannot take credit for the priorities, but I can support them and
advocate for them.

Additionally, from the Nova Roma Articles of Incorporation:

"The modern restoration of the ancient Roman Republic, as reflected in the
organization's cultural, religious and social activities; the promotion of
awareness of ancient Rome through educational, religious and charitable
projects."

The purpose of Nova Roma is succinctly stated in the quotation from the
Articles of Incorporation. Nova Roma is essentially, at least according to
the US government were the corporation is chartered through, a Religious and
Educational (cultural) organization with social implications. However, our
constitution states: "Magistrates, Senators, and citizens need not be
practitioners of the Religio Romana, but may not engage in any activity that
intentionally blasphemes or defames the Gods, the Religio Romana, or its
practitioners."Additionally, it also states:
"Nova Roma shall approach all other religions with a syncretistic outlook,
offering friendship to all paths which acknowledge the right of those who
practice and honor the Religio Romana to do so and respect the beliefs
thereof."Therefore, Nova Roma is an organization devoted to the Restoration
of the Roman Republic, and the Religio Romana, but it is not just some
"pagan social club" as another citizen mentioned, and I too share your
opinion on being labeled as such. I thank you for your support of my
reaffirmation of the Priorities of Nova Roma and hope your fellow citizens
will also share in these priorities.

Nova Roma is a great organization of which I am immensely proud to be
affiliated with and have the opportunity to serve in. Thank you for
supporting the priorities established by our Senate.

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Consul

On 6/8/06, flavius leviticus <centorious@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Modianus,I hereby make it publicaly known that I support you in
> your giving of the Religeo Romana your number one priority within Nova
> Roma.There has been much talk about the high moral standards of our Nation
> of Nova Roma.I feel that the Religeo Romana is the moral flagship of our
> Nation and should always be so.To be a citizen of this great Nation is to
> extol our Religeo and its high moral standards and Virtues to the world.Atthe very least to respect it in every
> regard.We deny not others who have other religeous preferences from
> becoming citizens and enjoying all the rights and benefits of Roman
> Citizenship as was the case in Roma Antigua excepting those that were
> enemies of the State.I resent the Religeo Romana being refered to a pagan
> social club and its implication that we are somehow on the lunatic
> fringe.Salvete Omnes,Appius Galerius Aurelianus.Semper Fidelis!
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44244 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano consule quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Consul, your edict "on Fascism" states:

"These doctrines being inimical to our Res Publica, any citizen who
publicly, either at an official Nova Roma event or electronic forum,
associates Nova Roma with such doctrines shall be in violation of the
principles in which Nova Roma was founded and at the discretion of the
Praetor warrant prosecution under our appropriate Laws."

This edict violates both the letter and the spirit of the lex
Constitutiva, our highest legal authority, which states:

"[Citizens have the right to] Complete authority over their own
personal and household rites, rituals, and beliefs, pagan or
otherwise..." (lex Constitutiva II.B.1)

and

"The right to participate in all public fora and discussions, and the
right to reasonably expect such fora to be supported by the State.
Such communications, regardless of their content, may not be
restricted by the State, except where they represent an imminent and
clear danger to the Republic." (lex Constitutiva II.B.4)

Your edict takes the first step in the direction which I have been
warning about during this entire discussion, consul. Although
pronounced with the best possible intentions, it is the first step to
creating a state in which only certain "acceptable" beliefs and
practices are allowed. This is not the direction the Republic should
be taking.

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44245 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: IT'S A SAD DAY
Salvete omnes,

I respect the decision of Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Consul to dismiss the trial against Appius Claudius Priscus, but I do not share his reasons. I feel deeply disgusted to think that an individual with the fanatical and despicable ideas of Priscus, should be a citizen of Nova Roma, and should keep on spreading those beliefs with entire impunity. For me, this is one especially sad day. I believe in Nova Roma and I will dedicate my efforts to work for her and to defend her.

Valete optime,

M•IVL•SEVERVS

PROPRÆTOR•PROVINCIÆ•MEXICO
ROGATOR
INTERPRETER
SCRIBA•CENSORIS•GEM
MVSÆVS•COLLEGII•ERATOVS•SODALITATIS•MVSARVM
SOCIVS•CHORI•MVSARVM


--
_______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.

Powered by Outblaze