Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Jun 8-14, 2006

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44245 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: IT'S A SAD DAY
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44246 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Regarding Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44247 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: a.d. VI Id. Iun.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44248 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44249 From: Dan Yano Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: mors
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44250 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44251 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: IT'S A SAD DAY
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44252 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: Rescindo petitionem actionis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44253 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44254 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44255 From: Shadow DarkFyre Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: IT'S A SAD DAY
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44256 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: Arriving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44257 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Off to Work / Rescindo petitionem actionis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44258 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: Rescindo petitionem actionis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44259 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44260 From: Tiberius Octavius Pulvillus Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: Appius Claudius Priscus--Please contact me.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44261 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: Senatus Consultum de Re Publica Defendenda
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44262 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44263 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44264 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Skype
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44265 From: Decimus Valerius Thomas Brunus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Arriving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44266 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Arriving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44267 From: l_fidelius_graecus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: On with her head
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44268 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Skype
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44269 From: Caius Curius Saturninus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: [Fwd: petition in favor of Classics in Portugal]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44270 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: [Fwd: petition in favor of Classics in Portugal]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44271 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: a.d V Id. Iun.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44272 From: Claudio Guzzo Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: edictum consulare on fascism and censor's resignation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44273 From: Claudio Guzzo Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: stop that trial, please
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44274 From: os390account Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: stop that trial, please
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44275 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: stop that trial, please
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44276 From: Decimus Valerius Thomas Brunus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Arriving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44277 From: dicconf Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: stop that trial, please
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44278 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: NOVO ROMAN EVENTS IN HISPANIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44279 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: NOVO ROMAN EVENTS IN HISPANIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44280 From: Brutus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44281 From: ancientworldbooks Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Ancient World Books: June's Acquisitions of Books for Sale.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44282 From: jrzblackshirt Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Fascism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44283 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Fascism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44284 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44285 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Happy Vestalia to all!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44288 From: C·ARMINIVS·RECCANELLVS Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Errata - EDICTVM•PROPRÆTORICIVM•XXIX (A C•ARMINIVS•RECCANELLVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44289 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Happy Vestalia to all!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44290 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: [Fwd: petition in favor of Classics in Portugal]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44291 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: RESIGNATION OF CITIZENSHIP!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44292 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: [Fwd: petition in favor of Classics in Portugal]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44293 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44294 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44295 From: flavius leviticus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Fascism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44296 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: stop that trial, please
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44297 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Senatus Consultum de Re Publica Defendenda
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44298 From: os390account Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: stop that trial, please
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44299 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: [Fwd: petition in favor of Classics in Portugal]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44300 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF CITIZENSHIP!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44301 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: [Fwd: petition in favor of Classics in Portugal]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44302 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44303 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44304 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44305 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44306 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44307 From: Decimus Valerius Thomas Brunus Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44308 From: causauk Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: Senatus Consultum de Re Publica Defendenda
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44309 From: Kevin Landry Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF CITIZENSHIP!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44310 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44311 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF CITIZENSHIP!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44312 From: flavius leviticus Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Defamation of Character!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44313 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: Arriving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44314 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: Skype
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44315 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Ezra Pound's citizenship was Re: RESIGNATION OF CITIZENSHIP!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44316 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: [Fwd: petition in favor of Classics in Portugal]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44317 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Iun.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44318 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44319 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: En: Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44320 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Errata - EDICTVM•PROPRÆTORICIVM•XXIX (A C•ARMIN
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44321 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44322 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44323 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44324 From: Tita Artoria Marcella Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Regarding Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44325 From: Jim Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Salve
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44326 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: Salve
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44327 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44328 From: decimus_tullius_atta Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Observations From a New Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44329 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44330 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44331 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: a.d. III Id. Iun.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44332 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44333 From: Brutus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Observations From a New Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44334 From: Brutus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Regarding Appius Claudius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44335 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Observations From a New Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44336 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Observations From a New Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44337 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Observations From a New Citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44338 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Multis de rebus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44339 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Salvete [welcome]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44340 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: De nominibus Romanis (ERAT: Edictum Censorum in Ap. Claudium Priscu
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44341 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: De rei publicae finibus (ERAT: Edictum consulare - On the Prioritie
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44342 From: Stefanie Beer Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] stop that trial, please
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44343 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: stop that trial, please
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44344 From: P.Memmius Albucius Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Multis .. - Piso's resignation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44345 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Multis .. - Piso's resignation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44346 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Multis .. - Piso's resignation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44347 From: Triarius Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: STOP...STOP...STOP!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44348 From: flavius leviticus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44349 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44352 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: prid. Id. Iun.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44353 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: New Graphic Site
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44354 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Multis .. - Piso's resignation/apology for Albicius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44355 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Roman Outfits
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44356 From: dicconf Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: New Graphic Site
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44357 From: rocknrockabilly Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44358 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Roman Outfits
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44359 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44360 From: rocknrockabilly Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44361 From: dicconf Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44362 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Roman Outfits
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44363 From: dicconf Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: "New Graphics Website" posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44364 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Roman Outfits
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44365 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Roman Outfits
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44366 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: STOP...STOP...STOP!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44367 From: Robert Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44368 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44369 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Roman Outfits
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44370 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44371 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44372 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Free Speech?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44373 From: antistoicus Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44374 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: [Fwd: petition in favor of Classics in Portugal]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44375 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Roman Outfits
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44376 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44377 From: antistoicus Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44378 From: Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44379 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44380 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44381 From: Tim Peters Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: New Graphic Site
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44382 From: Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44383 From: Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44384 From: antistoicus Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44385 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44386 From: dicconf Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44387 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44388 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44389 From: Richard Behnen Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Roman Outfits
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44390 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Roman Outfits
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44391 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Multis .. - Piso's resignation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44392 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44393 From: flavius leviticus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44394 From: flavius leviticus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44395 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Id. Iun.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44396 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44397 From: flavius leviticus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44398 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44399 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44400 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44401 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44402 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Vox Romana podcast
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44403 From: Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44404 From: Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44405 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44406 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44407 From: Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44408 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44409 From: P.Memmius Albucius Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Piso's resignation - on citizenship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44410 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Vox Romana podcast ( and Photos !!! )
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44411 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Piso's resignation - on citizenship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44412 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44413 From: P.Memmius Albucius Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Sabinus's photos and Traiana inscriptio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44414 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: Sabinus's photos and Traiana inscriptio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44415 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: post. Id. Iun. (a.d. XVIII Kal. Quin.)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44416 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44417 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44418 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44419 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: Piso's resignation - on citizenship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44420 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44421 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44422 From: antistoicus Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44423 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44424 From: P.Memmius Albucius Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: Traiana inscriptio



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44245 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: IT'S A SAD DAY
Salvete omnes,

I respect the decision of Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Consul to dismiss the trial against Appius Claudius Priscus, but I do not share his reasons. I feel deeply disgusted to think that an individual with the fanatical and despicable ideas of Priscus, should be a citizen of Nova Roma, and should keep on spreading those beliefs with entire impunity. For me, this is one especially sad day. I believe in Nova Roma and I will dedicate my efforts to work for her and to defend her.

Valete optime,

M•IVL•SEVERVS

PROPRÆTOR•PROVINCIÆ•MEXICO
ROGATOR
INTERPRETER
SCRIBA•CENSORIS•GEM
MVSÆVS•COLLEGII•ERATOVS•SODALITATIS•MVSARVM
SOCIVS•CHORI•MVSARVM


--
_______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.

Powered by Outblaze
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44246 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Regarding Appius Claudius Priscus
---Salve Artoria et Salvete Omnes:

This has been very unsettling to say the least, the entire matter. I
will be sorry if you go, but I do not know what manner of vow or
commitment you feel you have made to your patron deities.

I will suggest, that he didn't survive or not survive his trial
amica...as the trial itself was cancelled. So perhaps think on this
in your decision.

I'll be at work for a few hours today.

I'd me happy to talk with you IM, or anyone later today.

I think it is time for some constitutional amendments regarding the
citizenship clauses, and I'm opened the matter up for discussion in
the Senate and have asked for assistance in this regard.

Bene valete
Pompeia Minucia Strabo
Consul



In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tita Artoria Marcella"
<icehunter@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Consul Modianus scripsit:
>
> >All of the above being the case I am terminating the trial
> >against Appius Claudius Priscus.
>
> I made a vow, albeit not to the gods, that if Appius Claudius
Priscus were to survive his trial and remain a citizen, I would
relinquish my own citizenship. I feel that strongly about his
presence among us. After he published his alternative e-mail is was
easy enough to learn his past and beliefs, and tonight his defense
arguments made me want to vomit.
>
> Consul, I do not understand your decision, but I respect it. The
choice is now mine as to whether to pretend Priscus no longer is a
part of NR, or to do as my conscience dictates and renounce my
citizenship. Tonight I am still in shock. Hopefully tomorrow will
bring an answer.
>
> Valete,
> Artoria Marcella
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44247 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: a.d. VI Id. Iun.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem VI Idus Iunius; haec dies nefastus est.

"The Mind has its own goddess too. I note a sanctuary
Was vowed to Mind, during the terror of war with you,
Perfidious Carthage. You broke the peace, and astonished
By the consul's death, all feared the Moorish army.
Fear had driven out hope, when the Senate made their vows
To Mind, and immediately she was better disposed to them.
The day when the vows to the goddess were fulfilled
Is separated by six days from the approaching Ides." - Ovid, Fasti VI

"The consul, while all were panic-struck, himself sufficiently
undaunted though in so perilous a case, marshals, as well as the time
and place permitted, the lines which were thrown into confusion by
each man's turning himself towards the various shouts; and wherever he
could approach or be heard exhorts them, and bids them stand and
fight: for that they could not escape thence by vows and prayers to
the gods but by exertion and valour; that a way was sometimes opened
by the sword through the midst of marshalled armies, and that
generally the less the fear the less the danger. However, from the
noise and tumult, neither his advice nor command could be caught; and
so far were the soldiers from knowing their own standards, and ranks,
and position, that they had scarce sufficient courage to take up arms
and make them ready for battle; and certain of them were surprised
before they could prepare them, being burdened rather than protected
by them; while in so great darkness there was more use of ears than of
eyes. They turned their faces and eyes in every direction towards the
groans of the wounded, the sounds of blows upon the body or arms, and
the mingled clamours of the menacing and the affrighted. Some, as they
were making their escape, were stopped, having encountered a body of
men engaged in fight; and bands of fugitives returning to the battle,
diverted others. After charges had been attempted unsuccessfully in
every direction, and on their flanks the mountains and the lake, on
the front and rear the lines of the enemy enclosed them, when it was
evident that there was no hope of safety but in the right hand and
the sword; then each man became to himself a leader, and encourager to
action; and an entirely new contest arose, not a regular line, with
principes, hastati, and triarii; nor of such a sort as that the
vanguard should fight before the standards, and the rest of the troops
behind them; nor such that each soldier should be in his own legion,
cohort, or company: chance collects them into bands; and each man's
own will assigned to him his post, whether to fight in front or rear;
and so great was the ardour of the conflict, so intent were their
minds upon the battle, that not one of the combatants felt an
earthquake which threw down large portions of many of the cities of
Italy, turned rivers from their rapid courses, carried the sea up into
rivers, and levelled mountains with a tremendous crash." - Livy,
History of Rome XXII.5

"On the same account great games were vowed, at an expense of three
hundred and thirty-three thousand three hundred and thirty-three asses
and a third; moreover, it was decreed that sacrifice should be done
to Jupiter with three hundred oxen, to many other deities with white
oxen and the other victims. The vows being duly made, a supplication
was proclaimed; and not only the inhabitants of the city went with
their wives and children, but such of the rustics also as, possessing
any property themselves, were interested in the welfare of the state.
Then a lectisternium was celebrated for three days, the decemviri
for sacred things superintending. Six couches were seen, for Jupiter
and Juno one, for Neptune and Minerva another, for Mars and Venus a
third, for Apollo and Diana a fourth, for Vulcan and Vesta a fifth,
for Mercury and Ceres a sixth. Then temples were vowed. To Venus
Erycina, Quintus Fabius Maximus vowed a temple; for so it was
delivered from the prophetic books, that he should vow it who held the
highest authority in the state. Titus Otacilius the praetor vowed a
temple to Mens." - op. cit. XXII.10

The ancient Romans honored the goddess Mens ("Mind") on this day, to
fulfill a vow undertaken after a defeat by Hannibal in 217 BC. In
spring 217 BC, fresh from his victories at Tecino and Trebbia,
Hannibal and his Carthaginian army overtook and passed the army of
Roman Consul Cais Flaminius heading south toward Rome itself.
Flaminius was forced to play catch-up and pursued incautiously.
Hannibal decided to lay an ambush before another Roman army commanded
by the co-Consul Servilius could arrive to reinforce Flaminius. This
he did by sending men to light fires on the far hills of Tuoro to
decieve the Romans that they were safely at a distance. Then he drew
up his army on the hills overlooking the narrow Chiana Valley and the
narrow Malpasso Road which ran along side Lake Trasimene (Trasimeno).
At the head of the valley, he posted light missile troops and his
Celtiberian allies to block the road.

The next morning, confident that the Carthaginians were still at a
distance and despite the heavy morning fog, Flaminius put his army
into march column without advance scouts and began the march along the
Malpasso road. The van was stopped when its lead cohort ran into a
hail of missiles from Hannibal's blocking force. Then Hannibal sent
his whole army forward in a general charge, which reached the Roman
column before it was able to fully deploy. The confused legionaries
were forced to fight in open order. The Roman column was split into
three groups. The rear broke quickly under the weight of Hannibal's
cavalry and was driven into the waters of Lake Trasimene where they
were slain or drown. The center, including Flaminius, stood their
ground, attempting to deploy, but were eventually cut down by
Hannibal's Gauls in heavy combat. Flaminius' body was never found. The
van stood by, apparently only lightly engaged by Hannibal's blocking
force of Africans and Spaniards, but once the mist cleared and the
extent of the defeat was clear, they cut their way through the hills,
many escaping the encirclement.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Livy, Wikipedia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44248 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Equitio Catoni salutem dicit

A citizen is still permitted to have any personal belief they so desire, but
they cannot attach their belief onto Nova Roma in an inimical fashion. The
Edict is about the association of Nova Roma with racist and fascist
ideology.

Let us consider a through experiment:

A Nova Roma event is being held, and a citizen is giving a workshop
(lecture) on Rome and during the course of the lecture starts to illustrate
how Nazi Germany was a modern day Rome and emphasises that it was "very
similar to Nova Roma and what our goals are...," and proceeds to show the
similarity in symbols like the fasces or equates the Schutzstaffel (SS) to a
sort of "Praetorian Guard." And glorifies the exploits of the Nazi regime
and tries to link Nazi idealogy with that of Nova Roma through common
symbols.

The above thought experiment is an example of how a person can equate Nova
Roma with fascism. This is unacceptable and we should not tolerate that.

This does not mean that an individual cannot have their own personal
beliefs.

Technically a citizen *could* have the belief that the Gods of Rome, for
example, are demons and those who believe in them are going to "hell." This
could be a belief someone could have, but spreading this sort of belief in
Nova Roma forums would be just as inimical as someone equating Nova Roma
with fascism through common symbols.

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 6/8/06, gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano consule quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salve et salvete.
>
> Consul, your edict "on Fascism" states:
>
>
> "These doctrines being inimical to our Res Publica, any citizen who
> publicly, either at an official Nova Roma event or electronic forum,
> associates Nova Roma with such doctrines shall be in violation of the
> principles in which Nova Roma was founded and at the discretion of the
> Praetor warrant prosecution under our appropriate Laws."
>
> This edict violates both the letter and the spirit of the lex
> Constitutiva, our highest legal authority, which states:
>
> "[Citizens have the right to] Complete authority over their own
> personal and household rites, rituals, and beliefs, pagan or
> otherwise..." (lex Constitutiva II.B.1)
>
> and
>
> "The right to participate in all public fora and discussions, and the
> right to reasonably expect such fora to be supported by the State.
> Such communications, regardless of their content, may not be
> restricted by the State, except where they represent an imminent and
> clear danger to the Republic." (lex Constitutiva II.B.4)
>
> Your edict takes the first step in the direction which I have been
> warning about during this entire discussion, consul. Although
> pronounced with the best possible intentions, it is the first step to
> creating a state in which only certain "acceptable" beliefs and
> practices are allowed. This is not the direction the Republic should
> be taking.
>
> Vale et valete,
>
> Cato
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44249 From: Dan Yano Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: mors
Salvete omnes,
I haven't been here for very long -- a week, really -- but already I can see plenty of personalities. There's the vivacious and subdued; the assertive and the passive. There is also prejudice, distrust, spite, and vengeance. I speak, of course, of the personage of Appius Claudius Priscus, and the people who -- whether justly or unjustly -- bismirch his name. It took me a while to ascertain the specific reason for the outright enmity of this good community on this one sole person. What I found out everyone here knows -- that Priscus, having been accused of being in contact with NeoNazis and, furthermore, that he approsached the United States government with the intention of making Nova Roma a geographically political entity, is due to be put on trial by the statutes of Roman Law; that is, to be justly tried by a judge and jury, wityh the ability to plead guilty or innocent.
This story in of itself was unremarkable; Neo Nazis, I believe I am not incorrect in saying, are a well-known part of life; perhaps not a preferred one, but one that we must suffer all the same. therefore, I was disappointed, albeit unsurprised, that citizens of Nova Roma were attacking the character of Priscus without first determining his innocence. What did surprise me was the cause of the attacks upon his person. it was not because of his unsanctioned activities -- which would have been reasonable and certainly to be justified -- but rather about his relations with NeoNazi groups. In addition, as I perused the many messages -- often vindictive, even angry -- I kept on coming upon the phrase honor, how Nova Roma's reputation and honor were defiled by this person, etc., et al. Honor -- such an ambiguous, easily manipulated word. Honor -- the entity that launched countless thousands of ships more thjan dear old Helen ever could. Honor -- that being that
causes so much unnecessary strife, arguments, and futility. Honor -- that thing that we're all so very proud of, until we have to justify what exactly honor is. To put it bluntly, honor is the morals that we place upon ourselves and, to a certain extent, society. It is the justice and right in the world, the shining beacon that so very many find shelter in. Unfortunately, as I scanned the letters, I did not find in a single citizen's remarks of honor anything whatsoever akin to the truth of the word that they preached. To these people, honor was not a real, tangible thing; it was the means to an end. The old trick -- using mankind's scruples to twist arms and break bones. It's despicable. Who do these citizens think they are to try to use honor as a weapon? They do not understand it; they do not honor it. How dare they use it to justify means, and means to commit prejudicial acts, at that? It is inconscionable. In so many of these "honor" preachers, they speak
of immorality. How sadly ironic that the person they are pointing fingers at is not Priscus; it is themselves that they point to, through their sheer condescension and will to do harm.
Despite this devestating insight into the imperfections of the citizens of Nova Roma, I still held hope. "Come on," I said to myself. "Surely someone will stand against this bigotry, against this prejudice?" I was not disappointed. Enough of the good citizens defended the rights of the many, enough tried to be fairminded and stop what was turning into an us-and-them brawl. And yet, they were so few. I realized that my hope for just and fair even-handedness had to come from higher up. I looked to the censors, hoped, and was instantly crushed. The censors, who are charged with upholding justice and a little thing called "honor", had gone ahead and accused Priscus, before his trial had even begun, of being something he was yet to be proved to be. This I found to be extraordinarily immoral. High up or not, these censors had no right to persecute without the trial having even been initiated. Some may disagree with this. Some may claim that the censors,
in their high and, of course, unwaveringly just and wise councils had done what must be done. Absolute rubbish. Nowhere in old Romnan Law did the magistrates have that kind of power. Nor should they; absolute power absolutely corrupts,. This worries me immensely -- that those who are impowered for good are intentionally trying their hardest to do evil, if not ill will. Therec are older laws than those preached by the censors. There is truth. There are morals. Are these not important? Without these, there is no justice; there is only a system devoid of morality, devoid of truth, devoid of right.
The more that I see the picture, the more familiar it becomes -- and the more I find myself sickened by it. It's a brave new world out there, they say -- in Nova Roma, at least, Alduous Huxleyt's world seems to be coming to fruition: a "paradise" that does not suffer different thought, action, or being. A society that tries to control its individuals. Ah, oh honourable citizens, has it come to this? Am I to believe that because of prejudices the law, truth itself must be put on hold? One citizen complained and stated that there were quicker, more efficient measures. A coward's measures. Measures used to quiet all resistance. Injust measures. Immoral measures. Citizens of Nova Roma, this must not happen. Sir Edmund Burke once said, "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." I'm sure that after you review the facts, you will agree that the injustice of these proceedings is supreme. But will you let it continue?
Shall evil prevail? Some may think I have gone too far, some may think that I have attacked the unattackable. No one is that important. None should have such power. If I have attacked anyone, it is justified -- I have done it to uphold honor. Yes, honor -- for I will not and, indeed, cannot let the evils that my morals stand against prevail. Cicero once said, "The more law, the less justice". He said this because of the basic inherent corruptibility of the human soul. Let's prove him wrong. I, for my part, hope that this will be so. I do not pass judgement on Priscus; nor should you. His time is coming; ours is already here. will we let evil prevail or fight it? For, ladies and gentlemen, I see a dark tied rising, eager to choke all who fall to it -- and stand in its way. Quis custodies ipsos custodiet? Who watches the watchmen? We do. We are the last barrier.



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44250 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve consul et salvete omnes.

You wrote:

"A citizen is still permitted to have any personal belief they so
desire, but they cannot attach their belief onto Nova Roma in an
inimical fashion."

"Inimical" by whose definition, consul? I understand your intent but
this is still a violation of the lex Constitutiva. You cannot decide
what a citizen can say or not say, as the lex Constitutiva does not
give you that power, but instead explicitly guarantees the right to
unrestricted speech. If it comes to a question of authority, the lex
Constitutiva overrides any other legal or magisterial authority ---
even any perceived authority to "interpret" the lex Constitutiva itself.

What you *can* do is make as reasonably sure as possible that any
citizen in a position to be presenting Nova Roma to the public will
not be equating either ancient Rome or Nova Roma to Nazi Germany.

I am of course offended that you would throw in a completely
unnecessary dig at those of us who are not practitioners --- and
specifically Christians. And in point of fact the lex Constitutiva
guarantees that even someone who believes that the gods of Rome are
demons has the right to express that belief, unrestricted. A citizen
could claim that the moon is made of green cheese, or that the earth
is hollow and inhabited by tiny gnomes who keep engines running that
cause it to spin around --- it simply doesn't matter, consul. We are
free citizens of a free Republic.

You are reacting with hysteria to a set of beliefs the likes of which
have existed ever since two humans who did not look like each other
saw each other face to face --- and will exist until there are no more
humans left on the planet.

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44251 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: IT'S A SAD DAY
SALVE AMICE ET SALVETE !

I belive this story with Claudius Priscus is only a storm in a glass. Peoples like him, with different conceptions, extremist attitude and more, are a lot to the net. They join in organizations with a specific purpose : to find adherants. For that they need publicity. They used great words, great phrases, in a word, a lot of waste of energy in a wrong direction.Some peoples aren't able to learn something from history to not repeat mistakes.
You can say they are dangerous. Sure they are. From theory to practice is only one step. For that we must keep an eye on them.
But in this forum is not necessary. They will vanish, so long as we will treat with indiference their agitation. Our system works. Ours magistrates are on positions and they know better what is the best for Republic.
Each nova roman is first an e-mail here in Forum. Then, if he is a man of honour and his visions are the same with the organization ones, become a name. Finaly he is respected for what he doing in organization. Marcus Minucius, Quintus Suetonius have specified that in many posts.
In the Claudius Priscus case I can say that he already is blamed. It was his choice. My choice is to treat him with indiference in Forum. Sometime the things are moving on alone. Let's see who is Priscus in the next monts. I tell you from now : nothing.

The Consuls decisions it was a good one. We have a lot to work and not to vaste our time encouraging through discussions these kind of manifestations.

With the NR defend part, be sure, a lot of us are near you. Is not a sad day. Is only another day.

My post is available only for what is happened in this Forum. Outside is different. There the indiference attitude don't work.

VALETE,
IVL SABINVS


M•IVL•SEVERVS <marcusiuliusseverus@...> wrote:
Salvete omnes,

I respect the decision of Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Consul to dismiss the trial against Appius Claudius Priscus, but I do not share his reasons. I feel deeply disgusted to think that an individual with the fanatical and despicable ideas of Priscus, should be a citizen of Nova Roma, and should keep on spreading those beliefs with entire impunity. For me, this is one especially sad day. I believe in Nova Roma and I will dedicate my efforts to work for her and to defend her.

Valete optime,

M•IVL•SEVERVS

PROPRÆTOR•PROVINCIƕMEXICO
ROGATOR
INTERPRETER
SCRIBA•CENSORIS•GEM
MVSÆVS•COLLEGII•ERATOVS•SODALITATIS•MVSARVM
SOCIVS•CHORI•MVSARVM


--
_______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.

Powered by Outblaze




Yahoo! Groups Links












NOVA ROMANI !
Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support page to your websites.
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm

"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44252 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: Rescindo petitionem actionis
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Gnaeus Salvius Astur wrote:
>
> After discussing the issue with several magistrates, and after having
> been assured that it is in the best interest of Nova Roma that this
> trial does not continue, I hereby rescind the petitio actionis I
> presented against Ap. Claudius Priscus.

Best interests?

As a result of your actions here - vetoing our first attempt to purge
ourselves of this menace, then blocking our only alternative - Nova Roma
is now *knowingly and willingly* associating itself with a person known to
the US government as a neo-Nazi, racial separatist, anti-feminist
and anti-tax crackpot.

Thank you for adding a page to our FBI file.

A very few magistrates had the courage to do the right thing, but we
were outgunned, and the honour of the Republic has suffered as a
result.

M. Octavius Germanicus, Censor.


--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44253 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus C. Equitio Catoni salutem dicit

Hysteria? No. Civil discussion, yes.

Might I remind you of our list guidelines of acceptable behavior:

"Inappropriate behavior includes: The use of profane language;
misrepresentation of the truth for the purpose of making another
person look foolish; name-calling; criticizing a poster's personal
character as opposed to criticizing his ideas; making derogatory,
belittling, subjective statements about the Gods and Goddesses of
Rome or belittling deities of other religions (however, quoting from
a myth or historical material is allowed.)"

Your interpretation of our laws is, lets just accept this, different from
mine. I have been criticised this week by a number of citizens, and that is
ok. They have their right to do so. And please do not take my example about
"hell and demons" as attack against you or against Christians in Nova Roma
-- all of which I have found to be very respectful and honorable people.

Would it be acceptable, for example, for a fundamentalist (of any sort) to
come onto our electronic forums, or live venues, and preach that we were
going to hell because as an organization we are committed to the restoration
of the Religio Romana? Would a "fire and brimstone" speech be acceptable in
a Nova Roma forum (live or electronic)? I don't suspect it would. And that
was the point I was trying to make. However, a fundamentalist Christian,
Muslim, etc.. *could* join Nova Roma and discuss Rome and be respectful
while still holding these beliefs we simply do not need, nor tolerate per
our guidelines, any sort of "fire and brimstone" antics.

No hysterics. My point was not to somehow estrange Christian and Religio
relations.

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 6/8/06, gaiusequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano quiritibusque S.P.D.
>



> I am of course offended that you would throw in a completely unnecessary
> dig at those of us who are not practitioners --- and specifically
> Christians. And in point of fact the lex Constitutiva guarantees that even
> someone who believes that the gods of Rome are demons has the right to
> express that belief, unrestricted. A citizen could claim that the moon is
> made of green cheese, or that the earth is hollow and inhabited by tiny
> gnomes who keep engines running that cause it to spin around --- it simply
> doesn't matter, consul. We are free citizens of a free Republic.
> You are reacting with hysteria to a set of beliefs the likes of which have
> existed ever since two humans who did not look like each other saw each
> other face to face --- and will exist until there are no more humans left on
> the planet.
>
> Vale et valete,
>
> Cato
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44254 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano sal.

Salve consul.

I apologize if I went a little overboard there with the "hysteria"
thing; it is just that it is very easy to go from "we should try to
uphold a level of civility" to "you cannot say 'X' or you will be
punished" --- and it seems as though there are some of us who are
willing to move fairly rapidly along those lines.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44255 From: Shadow DarkFyre Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: IT'S A SAD DAY
Salve and Good Dreaming,

While I am the equivalent of a foreign observer to the doings of your nation, I must say that Iulius Sabinus spoke well and wisely. it is not a sad day, indeed. So long as you watch and keep vigilant against such dangers.
There was a time when the micronational community faced just such a situation. A micronation known as the Celestial Empire changed its skin, as it were, and became known as the Aryan National Socialist Empire(http://ansempire.net I believe), showing their support and views to be of a neo-Nazi nature. The uproar was much the same as here. Some decided to create a joint pact against such a nation. Others, like my nation, decided to watch and wait, and only act for such a time as when the ANSE would decide to act upon their views. We still watch. We still wait. We are ever ready to act. The Domain moreso than some.
I salute you, Iulius. It was a pleasure to see you put things into proper perspective. Wisely said, again.
To all of you, I wish you Good Dreaming and Blessed Be to you and yours, from myself and my people.
And to the litigant in question, the Domain and Realms will be watching you as well. Have a care.

Dream Well,
-ShadowDarkFyre the LordVengeance, ur-Lord
The Domain and Realms


/sdf

iulius sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
SALVE AMICE ET SALVETE !

I belive this story with Claudius Priscus is only a storm in a glass. Peoples like him, with different conceptions, extremist attitude and more, are a lot to the net. They join in organizations with a specific purpose : to find adherants. For that they need publicity. They used great words, great phrases, in a word, a lot of waste of energy in a wrong direction.Some peoples aren't able to learn something from history to not repeat mistakes.
You can say they are dangerous. Sure they are. From theory to practice is only one step. For that we must keep an eye on them.
But in this forum is not necessary. They will vanish, so long as we will treat with indiference their agitation. Our system works. Ours magistrates are on positions and they know better what is the best for Republic.
Each nova roman is first an e-mail here in Forum. Then, if he is a man of honour and his visions are the same with the organization ones, become a name. Finaly he is respected for what he doing in organization. Marcus Minucius, Quintus Suetonius have specified that in many posts.
In the Claudius Priscus case I can say that he already is blamed. It was his choice. My choice is to treat him with indiference in Forum. Sometime the things are moving on alone. Let's see who is Priscus in the next monts. I tell you from now : nothing.

The Consuls decisions it was a good one. We have a lot to work and not to vaste our time encouraging through discussions these kind of manifestations.

With the NR defend part, be sure, a lot of us are near you. Is not a sad day. Is only another day.

My post is available only for what is happened in this Forum. Outside is different. There the indiference attitude don't work.

VALETE,
IVL SABINVS


M•IVL•SEVERVS <marcusiuliusseverus@...> wrote:
Salvete omnes,

I respect the decision of Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Consul to dismiss the trial against Appius Claudius Priscus, but I do not share his reasons. I feel deeply disgusted to think that an individual with the fanatical and despicable ideas of Priscus, should be a citizen of Nova Roma, and should keep on spreading those beliefs with entire impunity. For me, this is one especially sad day. I believe in Nova Roma and I will dedicate my efforts to work for her and to defend her.

Valete optime,

M•IVL•SEVERVS

PROPRÆTOR•PROVINCIƕMEXICO
ROGATOR
INTERPRETER
SCRIBA•CENSORIS•GEM
MVSÆVS•COLLEGII•ERATOVS•SODALITATIS•MVSARVM
SOCIVS•CHORI•MVSARVM

--
_______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.

Powered by Outblaze

Yahoo! Groups Links

NOVA ROMANI !
Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support page to your websites.
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm

"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






There's magick in believing...
-The Domain and Realms
http://thedomainandrealms.batcave.net


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44256 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: Arriving
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus quaestor D. Valerio Thomae Bruno sal.:

Wellcome to Nova Roma! You have arrived in the midst of a scandalous situation, as you can see, but when this issue will have passed off, you'll see the magnificent face of our international community.

Sis prospera valetudine in Nova Roma!




Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
Q U A E S T O R
-------------------------------
Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
Accensus Consulis C. Fabii Buteonis
Scriba Censoris Cn. Equitii Marini
Scriba Aedilis Curulis T. Iulii Sabini
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae Scholasticae
-------------------------------
Decurio I. Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Dominus Factionis Russatae
Latinista, Classicus Philologus

Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale!
http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44257 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Off to Work / Rescindo petitionem actionis
Slavete omnes,

I must head to the field later today for a week or so but as usual I
shall be able to keep in touch with high speed net. I'll be down later
today and part of tomorrow though.

For the record I have to say that I am also responsible for the
rescindo. All involved discussed it and Consul Modianus has already
well summarized the valid reasons for coming to this decision. I fully
support his decision on this matter.

In my personal opinion I always wish that things would go smoothly and
come to conclusions without a hitch. I do not like interfering in the
legal system as well as some others before us just for a lark or
mental gymnatics. Citizens, not to mention magistrates themselves come
to us asking for intersessio on various matters (not us to them) and
their concerns and issues must be dealt with, discussed and resolved
even if we personally dislike the issues and perfer to let the
sleeping dog lie or not disturb a big hornet nest.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus

Tribunus Plebis









--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Gnaeus Salvius Astur wrote:
> >
> > After discussing the issue with several magistrates, and after
having
> > been assured that it is in the best interest of Nova Roma that this
> > trial does not continue, I hereby rescind the petitio actionis I
> > presented against Ap. Claudius Priscus.
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44258 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: Rescindo petitionem actionis
SALVE CENSOR M. OCTAVI GERMANICE!

Thank you for your correct words and for your courage! This will be my last post on this list. It is a sad day.
IGNAVA LEX, SED LEX.

Vale bene.
Gaius Cassius Piso


Matt Hucke <hucke@...> escreveu:
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Gnaeus Salvius Astur wrote:
>
> After discussing the issue with several magistrates, and after having
> been assured that it is in the best interest of Nova Roma that this
> trial does not continue, I hereby rescind the petitio actionis I
> presented against Ap. Claudius Priscus.

Best interests?

As a result of your actions here - vetoing our first attempt to purge
ourselves of this menace, then blocking our only alternative - Nova Roma
is now *knowingly and willingly* associating itself with a person known to
the US government as a neo-Nazi, racial separatist, anti-feminist
and anti-tax crackpot.

Thank you for adding a page to our FBI file.

A very few magistrates had the courage to do the right thing, but we
were outgunned, and the honour of the Republic has suffered as a
result.

M. Octavius Germanicus, Censor.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese




__________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44259 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
In a message dated 6/8/2006 5:24:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
tau.athanasios@... writes:
A Nova Roma event is being held, and a citizen is giving a workshop
(lecture) on Rome and during the course of the lecture starts to illustrate
how Nazi Germany was a modern day Rome and emphasises that it was "very
similar to Nova Roma and what our goals are...," and proceeds to show the
similarity in symbols like the fasces or equates the Schutzstaffel (SS) to a
sort of "Praetorian Guard." And glorifies the exploits of the Nazi regime
and tries to link Nazi idealogy with that of Nova Roma through common
symbols.
Consul,
<<An open comment to the Consul>>
You are reaching here and you know it. Equitius Cato is right, and you are
wrong.

To use your example against you, what if a Consul of Nova Roma gave a
demonstration and said that NR should be modernized, the laws changed to reflect the
21st century following
English common law et al. Why that Consul would just be as guilty as that
Nazi lecturer
would be wouldn't he? Most white supremacists follow Germany since they were
able to accomplish their goal under a dictator. The fact that the 1000 year
Empire broke up after Germany was defeated, matters little to them, it is the
ideal. It has nothing to do with the Roman symbol of curial authority.

Until Nova Roma gets that dictator, and we become white supremacists I
wouldn't worry.
But with you cherry picking beliefs as being undesirable, and issuing edicts
against them, we are well on our way aren't we?

Valete
Q. Fabius Maximus
In Nova Roma


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44260 From: Tiberius Octavius Pulvillus Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: Appius Claudius Priscus--Please contact me.
My name is Tiberius Octavius Pulvillus and I recieved your email I will be at the library computer till 4;30 today I will try to get back on tommarow some time between 8;oo am and 4;30 pm.

PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote: F. Galerius Aurelianus Appio Claudio Prisco Salve.

I have tried to reach you via your yahoo address but have been unsuccessful.
I have some questions for you concerning some of the points that have been
raised about you. I would appreciate it if you would email me at
_padruigtheuncle@..._ (mailto:padruigtheuncle@...) . This is not an official
request in any of my capacities in Nova Roma and is purely private. I hope to
be hearing from you.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS
Ancient history Citizenship test Nova Us citizenship test Citizenship test questions

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Nova-Roma" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44261 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: Senatus Consultum de Re Publica Defendenda
--- Salve Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor et Salvete Omnes!


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tiberius Galerius Paulinus"
<spqr753@...> wrote: (in discussion of the Senatus Consultum Ultimum
of Cicero and its legal ramifications)

(snippage)
>
>
>
> "Gaius Julius Caesar and others argued that the consultum could
not
> override the basic laws of the Roman state, that it meant merely
> that the Consuls should do their utmost within the framework of
the
> Roman Constitution to resolve the emergency

Pompeia: And there are those who maintain that Iulius Caesar would
had done well to practise what he preached :>)



The matter of law would
> never be settled, although Cicero would be exiled in 58 because of
> the executions (the exile was ordered by one of his political
> enemies, Publius Clodius Pulcher, and therefore should probably
not
> be seen as a completely valid response)."

Pompeia: Yes. Publius Clodius.... Which leads me in part to my
comment below.....
>
>
> The use of the Senatus consultum ultimum by the last generation of
> the Roman Republic was a major reason for it being the last
> generation of the Roman Republic.

Pompeia: Uh huh. Some scholars will sail in that boat. Others
will say such, but equally speculate that the inappropriate and/or
partisan use of the Tribune veto carte blanc may have influenced the
unfortunate turn of events of the late republic. Google around a
bit, or perhaps you have, in your capacity as Tribune in 2004. But
one doesn't really have to go that far back in history to find some
rather blistering examples of this, really.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

Valete
Pompeia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44262 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
Salve Cato et salvete Omnes,

I am sure I need not say that in our system we choose people for
certain offices in which they have the duty sometimes to act on our
behalf. Of course they must exercise their judgement in doing so.

So Citizens, let this be a reminder of the importance of the election
process. Vote wisely that we have wise leaders.

Optime valete

M. Lucr. Agricola



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiusequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato G. Fabio Buteoni Modiano sal.
>
> Salve consul.
>
> I apologize if I went a little overboard there with the "hysteria"
> thing; it is just that it is very easy to go from "we should try to
> uphold a level of civility" to "you cannot say 'X' or you will be
> punished" --- and it seems as though there are some of us who are
> willing to move fairly rapidly along those lines.
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44263 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
Salve Senator,

Respectfully, I disagree and I think you missed a small point. The
Consul's edict says "...publicly... associates Nova Roma with such
doctrines..."

So he is not speaking about *holding* any belief, he is speaking about
an *act*, and not an act in private correspondence but in public.

The Consul's edict speaks to the point of a citizen publicly *acting*
to associate Nova Roma with racism and all the other nasty things
mentioned.


In my opinion this does no more than affirm that the leadership of the
Res Publica will take action against these sort of slanderous
associations. I am glad that they have taken note of this problem and
I am furhter glad that the edict takes aim at an act (associating Nova
Roma with things we have officially repudiated) and not the beliefs.

Senator, I hope you will give these points your consideration, and
having done so I hope you will lend your support to the Consul in this
matter of defending the public image and reputation of the Res Publica.


Optime vale

M. Lucretius Agricola




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 6/8/2006 5:24:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> tau.athanasios@... writes:
> A Nova Roma event is being held, and a citizen is giving a workshop
> (lecture) on Rome and during the course of the lecture starts to
illustrate
> how Nazi Germany was a modern day Rome and emphasises that it was "very
> similar to Nova Roma and what our goals are...," and proceeds to
show the
> similarity in symbols like the fasces or equates the Schutzstaffel
(SS) to a
> sort of "Praetorian Guard." And glorifies the exploits of the Nazi
regime
> and tries to link Nazi idealogy with that of Nova Roma through common
> symbols.
> Consul,
> <<An open comment to the Consul>>
> You are reaching here and you know it. Equitius Cato is right, and
you are
> wrong.
>
> To use your example against you, what if a Consul of Nova Roma gave a
> demonstration and said that NR should be modernized, the laws
changed to reflect the
> 21st century following
> English common law et al. Why that Consul would just be as guilty
as that
> Nazi lecturer
> would be wouldn't he? Most white supremacists follow Germany since
they were
> able to accomplish their goal under a dictator. The fact that the
1000 year
> Empire broke up after Germany was defeated, matters little to them,
it is the
> ideal. It has nothing to do with the Roman symbol of curial authority.
>
> Until Nova Roma gets that dictator, and we become white supremacists I
> wouldn't worry.
> But with you cherry picking beliefs as being undesirable, and
issuing edicts
> against them, we are well on our way aren't we?
>
> Valete
> Q. Fabius Maximus
> In Nova Roma
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44264 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-08
Subject: Skype
Salvete omnes;
I know a lot of us have Skype which makes it easy to talk to all our
friends who are not so far away now. But Skype just recently has a
promotion for the U.S & Canada - you can make free calls from Skype to
regular telphones until December 2006.
I did not buy any Skype Out minutes and placed calls to regular
phone numbers for $0 U.S or Canadian:)Sorry European, Mexican & South
American cives, it is unfair...
bene vale
Marca Hortensia Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44265 From: Decimus Valerius Thomas Brunus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Arriving
Sir,

About the scandal you've mentioned, I could only aprehend, so far, that it
has something to do with national-socialist manifestations whithin Nova
Roma, but I'll be soon looking for related messafes in the archives of our
mailgroup. In the meanwhile, I'd be glad if you could make me a short report
about the case.

Thank you for the wellcoming answer, by the way. ;-)

Decimus Valerius Thomas Brunus
Brasilia Provincia

Brasilia, aeterni amoris fiat symbolum,
Quod affers tecum, labarum stellatum,
En dicat aurea viridisque flammula
Ventura pax decusque superatum.
- Hymnus Brasiliensis


_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
Sent: quinta-feira, 8 de junho de 2006 13:03
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Arriving



Cn. Cornelius Lentulus quaestor D. Valerio Thomae Bruno sal.:

Wellcome to Nova Roma! You have arrived in the midst of a scandalous
situation, as you can see, but when this issue will have passed off, you'll
see the magnificent face of our international community.

Sis prospera valetudine in Nova Roma!



Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
Q U A E S T O R
-------------------------------
Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
Accensus Consulis C. Fabii Buteonis
Scriba Censoris Cn. Equitii Marini
Scriba Aedilis Curulis T. Iulii Sabini
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae Scholasticae
-------------------------------
Decurio I. Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Dominus Factionis Russatae
Latinista, Classicus Philologus

Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale!
http://it.yahoo
<http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com>
com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44266 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Arriving
> A. Tullia Scholastica D. Valerio Thomae Bruno quiritibus, sociis,
> peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
>
> Sir,
>
> About the scandal you've mentioned, I could only aprehend, so far, that it
> has something to do with national-socialist manifestations whithin Nova
> Roma, but I'll be soon looking for related messafes in the archives of our
> mailgroup. In the meanwhile, I'd be glad if you could make me a short report
> about the case.
>
> ATS: This is a matter in which one comparatively new citizen has been
> accused of being a Nazi and of having contacted government agencies in that
> capacity regarding Nova Roma. The trial was aborted after opening statements
> on both sides. Only one citizen is involved, so I would hardly call this
> National Socialist manifestations in Nova Roma, even if these accusations had
> been proven.
>
> Periodically, we have outbreaks of temper on this list, which is one of
> the reasons why we suggest that new citizens like yourself subscribe to the
> NewRoman list instead, so that you can learn about Nova Roma from magistrates
> and magisterial assistants without having to face such outbursts. Not
> everyone seems to be aware that adults discuss matters in a calm and reasoned
> tone while refraining from attacking others.
>
> Thank you for the wellcoming answer, by the way. ;-)
>
> ATS: And I welcome you, too. We had some discussions in the censor¹s
> office about your name...
>
> Decimus Valerius Thomas Brunus
> Brasilia Provincia
>
> Brasilia, aeterni amoris fiat symbolum,
> Quod affers tecum, labarum stellatum,
> En dicat aurea viridisque flammula
> Ventura pax decusque superatum.
> - Hymnus Brasiliensis
>
> ATS: This is quite pretty...
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> Behalf
> Of Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
> Sent: quinta-feira, 8 de junho de 2006 13:03
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Arriving
>
> Cn. Cornelius Lentulus quaestor D. Valerio Thomae Bruno sal.:
>
> Wellcome to Nova Roma! You have arrived in the midst of a scandalous
> situation, as you can see, but when this issue will have passed off, you'll
> see the magnificent face of our international community.
>
> Sis prospera valetudine in Nova Roma!
>
> Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
> Q U A E S T O R
> -------------------------------
> Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
> Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
> Accensus Consulis C. Fabii Buteonis
> Scriba Censoris Cn. Equitii Marini
> Scriba Aedilis Curulis T. Iulii Sabini
> Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae Scholasticae
> -------------------------------
> Decurio I. Sodalitatis Latinitatis
> Dominus Factionis Russatae
> Latinista, Classicus Philologus
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44267 From: l_fidelius_graecus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: On with her head
SOTHEBY'S REUNITES ANCIENT ROMAN FIGURE OF APHRODITE WITH HER HEAD
MICHAEL C. CARLOS MUSEUM AT EMORY UNIVERSITY PURCHASES FIGURE FOR
$968,000 AND ACQUIRES HEAD PRIVATELY SOTHEBY'S SCHOLARSHIP LEADS TO
EXTRAORDINARY DISCOVERY

New York, NY - June 6, 2006 – Today at Sotheby's, following an
extraordinary achievement in scholarship, an ancient Roman Figure of
Aphrodite was reunited with her Head after the two elements had been
separated for at least 50 years. The figure was purchased in today's
auction of Antiquities for $968,000 by the Michael C. Carlos Museum
at Emory University. Immediately following the fall of the hammer,
the Museum also purchased the head by private sale. This remarkable
achievement was made possible by extensive research done by Sotheby's
Antiquities experts. Today's auction totalled $4,584,172, above a
high estimate of $4.1 million.

Richard M. Keresey, Worldwide Director of Sotheby's Antiquities
Department commented, "This is a great moment for the world of
Antiquities and one we will always remember. Because of my colleague
Florent Heintz's research skills astonishing visual memory, Aphrodite
has regained not only her head, but also her history. We are
particularly thrilled that this outstanding piece, in her entirety,
will be on view to the public at such a wonderful institution."
Jasper Gaunt, Curator of Greek and Roman Art at the Michael C. Carlos
Museum at Emory University, said, "This is an incredibly exciting
moment for our institution. We are actively building a collection of
Ancient Art of peerless quality and this piece is without question
the finest Aphrodite in the United States. The opportunity to own a
piece of this importance in its entirety was irresistible and she
will assume a position of prominence in our collection. We are
grateful that Sotheby's was able to assist in consummating a private
sale of the figure's head."

Nearly three months ago, Mrs. Lawrence Copley Thaw, Sr. of New York,
consigned a Marble Figure of Aphrodite, Roman Imperial, dating to
circa late 1st century/early 2nd Century A.D., to Sotheby's June 2006
sale of Antiquities. As is not uncommon with Antiquities, the figure
was missing elements, in this case, her head and one arm. After in-
depth research, Sotheby's experts discovered an engraving of the
complete figure, published in 1836 when it was part of a private
collection in Paris. The rendering of the head in the engraving
immediately struck Mr. Heintz as familiar; he remembered that
Sotheby's had sold a similar head on December 11, 2002 (lot 12),
possibly the one belonging to Mrs. Thaw's headless figure.

Sotheby's then contacted the private collector from Houston, Texas
who had purchased the head in 2002; and she graciously offered to
bring it to New York to see if Mr. Heintz's theory proved correct.
When the head arrived in New York, Mr. Keresey and Mr. Heintz
realized that, based on the dimensions of the neck, grain of the
marble, weathering of both pieces, style of carving, tilt and turn of
the head, combined with the existence of the engraving, the head did
in fact belong with the body. The owner of the head then agreed to
make the piece available for private sale exclusively to the
successful purchaser of the body in today's auction.
http://www.sothebys.com

For more information on the Michael C. Carlos Museum, please go to
http://www.carlos.emory.edu/


http://www.news-antique.com/?id=781521&keys=head-aphrodite-sothebys-
carlos-museum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44268 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Skype
Salvete:

I just downloaded and installed Skype on my computer. My user ID is:
modianus

Anyone interested in talking send me an e-mail and we can establish a time
when it would be good to talk. I want everyone to know that they can easily
be reached.

Valete:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Consul

On 6/8/06, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes;
> I know a lot of us have Skype which makes it easy to talk to all our
> friends who are not so far away now. But Skype just recently has a
> promotion for the U.S & Canada - you can make free calls from Skype to
> regular telphones until December 2006.
> I did not buy any Skype Out minutes and placed calls to regular
> phone numbers for $0 U.S or Canadian:)Sorry European, Mexican & South
> American cives, it is unfair...
> bene vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44269 From: Caius Curius Saturninus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: [Fwd: petition in favor of Classics in Portugal]
Salvete omnes,

Here is a petition in favour of Classicis teaching in Portugal. At
the website mentioned in the message there's further information and
you can read the petition.

Valete,


Begin forwarded message:

> A PETITION IN FAVOR OF CLASSICS IN PORTUGAL
>
> Dear Colleagues and Friends
>
> Classics in Portugal are by now suffering their greatest attack in
> many
> years. Help us to fight against this cultural narrowness of our
> politics, by signing and sending to others, mainly to the members of
> FIEC, the Petition in Favor of Classical Languages en Portugal:
>
> http://www.PetitionOnline.com/classici/petition.html
>
> Thanking you all in advance,
>
> Francisco de Oliveira, Full Professor of Classics and President of
> Euroclassica
>
> NOTA BENE:
> If you want to hear later from us and get a feedback on the outcome of
> this petition, when signing it, please check the box ³Available to
> Petition Author² regarding your email address options.
>
> Si vous désirez recevoir plus tard un message avec l¹information
> sur les
> résultats de cette petition sélectionnez cochez s.v.p. la case
> ³Available to Petition Author² dans le panneau d¹affichage des options
> concernant l¹adresse de votre courier électronique.
>
> Se desejar receber posteriormente da parte dos promotores alguma
> informação acerca dos resultados da petição, por favor, ao entrar na
> página de subscrição, seleccione a opção ³Available to Petition
> Author²
> no item respeitante ao seu endereço de correio electrónico.


Caius Curius Saturninus

Propraetor Provinciae Thules
Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova

"All we need is lightning
With power and might
Striking down the prophets of false
As the moon is rising
Give us the sign
Now let us rise up in awe"

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org
gsm: +358-50-3315279
fax: +358-9-8754751





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44270 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: [Fwd: petition in favor of Classics in Portugal]
Salvete:

Classics are an important academic discipline. I signed the petition, and
it only took a minute or two.

Valete:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 6/9/06, Caius Curius Saturninus <c.curius@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Here is a petition in favour of Classicis teaching in Portugal. At
> the website mentioned in the message there's further information and
> you can read the petition.
>
> Valete,
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > A PETITION IN FAVOR OF CLASSICS IN PORTUGAL
> >
> > Dear Colleagues and Friends
> >
> > Classics in Portugal are by now suffering their greatest attack in
> > many
> > years. Help us to fight against this cultural narrowness of our
> > politics, by signing and sending to others, mainly to the members of
> > FIEC, the Petition in Favor of Classical Languages en Portugal:
> >
> > http://www.PetitionOnline.com/classici/petition.html
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44271 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: a.d V Id. Iun.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem V Idus Iunius; haec dies nefastus est.

"Vesta, favour me! I'll open my lips now in your service,
If I'm indeed allowed to attend your sacred rites.
I was rapt in prayer: I felt the heavenly deity,
And the happy earth shone with radiant light.
Not that I saw you, goddess (away with poets' lies!)
Nor were you to be looked on by any man:
But I knew what I'd not known, and the errors
I'd held to were corrected without instruction.
They say Rome had celebrated the Parilia forty times,
When the goddess, the Guardian of the Flame, was received
In her shrine, the work of Numa, that peace-loving king,
(None more god-fearing was ever born in Sabine lands.)
The roofs you see of bronze were roofs of straw then,
And its walls were made of wickerwork.
This meagre spot that supports the Hall of Vesta
Was then the mighty palace of unshorn Numa.
Yet the form of the temple, that remains, they say,
Is as before, and is shaped so for good reason.
Vesta's identified with Earth: in them both's unsleeping fire:
Earth and the hearth are both symbols of home.
The Earth's a ball not resting on any support,
It's great weight hangs in the ether around it.
Its own revolutions keep its orb balanced,
It has no sharp angles to press on anything,
And it's placed in the midst of the heavens,
And isn't nearer or further from any side,
For if it weren't convex, it would be nearer somewhere,
And the universe wouldn't have Earth's weight at its centre.
There's a globe suspended, enclosed by Syracusan art,
That's a small replica of the vast heavens,
And the Earth's equidistant from top and bottom.
Which is achieved by its spherical shape.
The form of this temple's the same: there's no angle
Projecting from it: a rotunda saves it from the rain.
You ask why the goddess is served by virgins?
I'll reveal the true reason for that as well.
They say that Juno and Ceres were born of Ops
By Saturn's seed, Vesta was the third daughter:
The others married, both bore children they say,
The third was always unable to tolerate men.
What wonder if a virgin delights in virgin servants,
And only allows chaste hands to touch her sacred relics?
Realize that Vesta is nothing but living flame,
And you'll see that no bodies are born from her.
She's truly a virgin, who neither accepts seed
Nor yields it, and she loves virgin companions.
I foolishly thought for ages that there were statues
Of Vesta, later I learnt there were none beneath her dome:
An undying fire is concealed with the shrine,
But there's no image of Vesta or of fire.
The earth's supported by its energy: Vesta's so called from `depending
On energy' (vi stando), and that could be the reason for her Greek
ame. But the hearth (focus) is named from its fire that warms (fovet)
all things:
Formerly it stood in the most important room.
I think the vestibule was so called from Vesta too:
In praying we address Vesta first, who holds first place.
It was once the custom to sit on long benches by the fire,
And believe the gods were present at the meal:
Even now in sacrificing to ancient Vacuna,
They sit and stand in front of her altar hearths.
Something of ancient custom has passed to us:
A clean dish contains the food offered to Vesta.
See, loaves are hung from garlanded mules,
And flowery wreaths veil the rough millstones.
Once farmers only used to parch wheat in their ovens,
(And the goddess of ovens has her sacred rites):
The hearth baked the bread, set under the embers,
On a broken tile placed there on the heated floor.
So the baker honours the hearth, and the lady of hearths,
And the she-ass that turns the pumice millstones.
Red-faced Priapus shall I tell of your shame or pass by?
It's a brief tale but it's a merry one.
Cybele, whose head is crowned with towers,
Called the eternal gods to her feast.
She invited the satyrs too, and those rural divinities,
The nymphs, and Silenus came, though no one asked him.
It's forbidden, and would take too long, to describe the banquet
Of the gods: the whole night was spent drinking deep.
Some wandered aimlessly in Ida's shadowy vales,
Some lay, and stretched their limbs, on the soft grass.
Some played, some slept, others linked arms
And beat swift feet threefold on the grassy earth.
Vesta lay carelessly, enjoying a peaceful rest,
Her head reclining, resting on the turf.
But the red-faced keeper of gardens chased the nymphs
And goddesses, and his roving feet turned to and fro.
He saw Vesta too: it's doubtful whether he thought her
A nymph, or knew her as Vesta: he himself denied he knew.
He had wanton hopes, and tried to approach her in secret,
And walked on tiptoe, with a pounding heart.
Old Silenus had chanced to leave the mule
He rode by the banks of a flowing stream.
The god of the long Hellespont was about to start,
When the mule let out an untimely bray.
Frightened by the raucous noise, the goddess leapt up:
The whole troop gathered, and Priapus fled through their hands.
The people of Lampsacus sacrifice this animal to him, singing:
`Rightly we give the innards of the witness to the flames.'
Goddess, you deck the creature with necklaces of loaves,
In remembrance: work ceases: the empty mills fall silent.
I'll explain the meaning of an altar of Jove the Baker
That stands on the Thunderer's citadel, more famous
For name than worth. The Capitol was surrounded
By fierce Gauls: the siege had already caused a famine.
Summoning the gods to his royal throne,
Jupiter said to Mars: `Begin!' and he quickly replied:
`My people's plight is surely unknown,
A grief that needs a voice of heartfelt complaint.
But if I'm to tell a sad and shameful tale in brief,
Rome lies under the feet of an Alpine enemy.
Jupiter, is this the Rome that was promised power
Over the world! Rome, the mistress of the earth?
She'd crushed the neighbouring cities, and the Etruscans:
Hope was rampant: now she's driven from her home.
We've seen old men, dressed in embroidered robes
Of triumph, murdered in their bronze-clad halls:
We've seen Ilian Vesta's sacred pledges hurried
From their place: some clearly think of the gods.
But if they look back at the citadel you hold,
And see so many of your homes under siege,
They'll think worship of the gods is vain,
And incense from a fearful hand thrown away.
If only they'd an open field of battle! Let them arm,
And if they can't be victorious, let them die.
Now without food, and dreading a cowardly death,
They're penned on their hill, pressed by a barbarous mob.'
Then Venus, and Vesta, and glorious Quirinus with auger's staff
And striped gown, pleaded on behalf of their Latium.
Jupiter replied: `There's a common concern for those walls.
And the Gauls will be defeated and receive punishment.
But you, Vesta, mustn't leave your place, and see to it
That the bread that's lacking be considered plentiful.
Let whatever grain is left be ground in a hollow mill,
Kneaded by hand, and then baked in a hot oven.'
He gave his orders, and Saturn's virgin daughter
Obeyed his command, as the hour reached midnight.
Now sleep had overcome the weary leaders: Jupiter
Rebuked them, and spoke his wishes from holy lips:
`Rise, and from the heights of the citadel, throw down
Among the enemy, the last thing you'd wish to yield!'
They shook off sleep, and troubled by the strange command,
Asked themselves what they must yield, unwillingly.
It seemed it must be bread: They threw down the gifts
Of Ceres, clattering on the enemy helms and shields.
The expectation that they could be starved out vanished.
The foe was repulsed, and a bright altar raised to Jove the Baker.
On the festival of Vesta, I happened to be returning
By the recent path that joins the New Way to the Forum.
There I saw a lady descending barefoot:
Astonished, I was silent and stopped short.
An old woman from the neighbourhood saw me: and telling
Me to sit, spoke to me in a quavering voice, shaking her head:
`Here, where the forums are now, was marshy swamp:
A ditch was wet with the overflow from the river.
That lake of Curtius, that supports the altars un-wet,
Is solid enough now, but was a pool of water once.
Where processions file through the Velabrum to the Circus,
There was nothing but willow and hollow reeds:
Often some guest returning over suburban waters,
Sang out, and hurled drunken words at the boatmen.
That god, Vertumnus, whose name fits many forms,
Wasn't yet so-called from damning back the river (averso amne).
Here too was a thicket of bulrushes and reeds,
And a marsh un-trodden by booted feet.
The pools are gone, and the river keeps its banks,
And the ground's dry now: but the custom remains.'
So she explained it. I said: `Farewell, good dame!
May whatever of life remains to you be sweet.'
I'd already heard the rest of the tale in boyhood,
But I won't pass over it in silence on that account.
Ilus, scion of Dardanus, had founded a new city
(Ilus was still rich, holding the wealth of Asia)
A sky-born image of armed Minerva was said
To have fallen on the hillside near to Troy.
(I was anxious to see it: I saw the temple and the site,
That's all that's left there: Rome has the Palladium.)
Apollo Smintheus was consulted, and gave this answer
From truthful lips, in the darkness of his shadowy grove:
`Preserve the heavenly goddess, and preserve
The City: with her goes the capital of empire.'" - Ovid, Fasti VI

Today is the celebration of the Vestalia, in honor of the goddes
Vesta. Interestingly enough, Romans did not portray Vesta, at her
altar, in statuary. The flame of the hearth, instead, symbolized her
presence. They did portray both Vesta and Vestals elsewhere (e.g., a
row of statues outside the House of the Vestals). At home, the Roman
family gathered once a day to offer Vesta a sacrifice. The Temple of
Vesta was located in a small round building in the Forum (which thus
served as the hearth of the Roman community). Technically speaking ,
the building was not a "temple," but a "house." Romans believed the
fire should never go out.

A priestess-hood of specially chosen women (all virgins) were devoted
to Vesta and supervised her worship (and the flame of her hearth).
Romans called these women the Vestal Virgins. It seems that this group
was created to fulfill the religious duties that, according to
Plutarch's life of Numa, the daughters of Roman kings had performed
under the monarchy. If the Vestal Virgins let the fire go out, they
had to rekindle it by rubbing twigs together. Then they were whipped
by the Pontifex Maximus, for their failure to attend the hearth.

For the Vestalia, the Vestals made mola salsa (holy cake). To do this
they walked to a sacred spring to fetch water. They carried the water
in special jugs with a base designed to tip the jug over if it was set
down. The water for the mola salsa could never come in contact with
the earth. The salt used to make the was also prepared in a ritual
fashion. Brine was pounded then baked in a jar until it formed a rock
so hard that the Vestals had to use an iron saw to cut it.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Wikipedia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44272 From: Claudio Guzzo Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: edictum consulare on fascism and censor's resignation
gaiusequitiuscato wrote:
<This edict violates both the letter and the spirit of the lex
Constitutiva, our highest legal authority (omissis)
Your edict takes the first step in the direction which I have been
warning about during this entire discussion, consul. Although
pronounced with the best possible intentions, it is the first step to
creating a state in which only certain "acceptable" beliefs and
practices are allowed. This is not the direction the Republic should
be taking.Vale et valete,
Cato>
and
<A citizen
could claim that the moon is made of green cheese, or that the earth
is hollow and inhabited by tiny gnomes who keep engines running that
cause it to spin around --- it simply doesn't matter, consul. We are
free citizens of a free Republic.>
Great! I agree. Next time there will be edicta on socialism, on fashion, on political correct. So, NR should set her antifascist, antiracist, antisatanic, antisomething nature. Please, stop this kind of edicta and remember our priorities: why should we fight against other neo-romans just because they like Mussolini or heavy metal or something else that most of us don't like? Was fascism against Gods? Was fascism against Roma? Anyway, Christians were and are against our Gods, but - if they want to stay in our micronation - why should we blame them? Please, stop these dispotic edicta. There were no Catacumbae and religion or politic persecutions during the Republic.

"Matt Hucke" hucke@... wrote:
<As a result of your actions here - vetoing our first attempt to purge
ourselves of this menace, then blocking our only alternative - Nova Roma
is now *knowingly and willingly* associating itself with a person known to
the US government as a neo-Nazi, racial separatist, anti-feminist
and anti-tax crackpot.
A very few magistrates had the courage to do the right thing, but we
were outgunned, and the honour of the Republic has suffered as a
result.
M. Octavius Germanicus, Censor.>
Respect all religions and political views doesn't mean we share them. Capitis deminutio could be a consequence only of a serious crime against NR. You are a censor and shouldn't offend other magistrates and our Republic, just because our law is more tolerant and civil than you, Germanicus.
"Dan Yano" catothecensor2005@...
wrote:
<The censors, who are charged with upholding justice and a little thing called "honor", had gone ahead and accused Priscus, before his trial had even begun, of being something he was yet to be proved to be. This I found to be extraordinarily immoral. High up or not, these censors had no right to persecute without the trial having even been initiated. Some may disagree with this. Some may claim that the censors,
in their high and, of course, unwaveringly just and wise councils had done what must be done. Absolute rubbish. Nowhere in old Romnan Law did the magistrates have that kind of power. Nor should they; absolute power absolutely corrupts,. This worries me immensely>

Vale
ACC


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44273 From: Claudio Guzzo Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: stop that trial, please
"Matt Hucke" hucke@...
wrote:
<And this one is a German by descent, and will not perpetuate,
tolerate, or sanction the evil perpetrated by my people in the
past. Octavius.>
I've never heard that Germans perpetrated any evil or knew and approve it. Please do not offend all Germans!

"pompeia_minucia_tiberia" pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...
wrote:
<Nobody is going to receive a lethal injection or stand before a
firing squad as a result of a Senatus Consutum Ultimum. They would
just be escorted to the door that says "EXIT"
Pompeia>
If you consider it not serious, please use that door.

QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
<Censors (omissis) Observers on this list would
have to conclude that your action was for your own appeasement and not the
State's.>

"gaiusequitiuscato" mlcinnyc@...
wrote:
<As a citizen of the United States, Claudius Priscus retains the right
to freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution of that country.
Our lex Constitutiva upholds that right. (omissis)>
If you are right (and I think you are) there is an abuse and Priscus is a victim. And we are too,
because (Gnaeus Iulius Caesar) <when the rights
of one are suspended then the rights of all are at risk, (omissis)and expulsion of a citizen is a matter that should concern the whole
community in order to prevent abuse by magistrates>
He talks about future abuse, but forget that this trial is an abuse and that the Nota is an abuse too, because ideas and proposals cannot offend: if there is someone who could be offended why do those magistrates told them those ideas and proposals? why do we all have to read about those things that are not about ancient and nova Roma? Isn't there a kind of prosecution to stop these abuses? this trial that is not extrema ratio?
"Maior" rory12001@... rory12001
wrote:
<-Salvete omnes:
you see I have given Priscus the cognomen "Ignotus" - meaning
unknown, low-born, ignorant. Please refer to him by this name so he
will not see his Nova Roman name glorified on this list. Frankly
laughter and derision is what he deserves.
If Ignotus is reallly a cowardly soul, I'd like to hear him
spout his racist beliefs with me in the middle of Tel Aviv or
Durham, NC:)
bene valete in Mente!
Marca Hortensia Maior>
Please, respect him to respect us. He is undergoing a trial for the same reason of so many "pagan" in the past: his ideas are not common and someone hates him. NR magistrates are creating a victim and your laughter and derision make me think of Giordano Bruno and other heros of the past. Please, censores, do something against Marca Hortensia Maior! She wants us to do to Priscus what someone did to Jews during IIWW, what a shame!
Valete!
ACC





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44274 From: os390account Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: stop that trial, please
Salvete,

--- plethora of discourse and diatribe deleted ---

You know, from an outside hypothetical view, this whole "trial" thing
might appear to be a very successful attempt at factionalization and
ad hoc gerrymandering of the people to cut out portions of the herd
for the wolves' own purposes.

E.g.

A recipe for chaos:

1) Walk into a group
2) Spout some questionable and provocative ideas
3) Ferment/foment
4) Sit back and watch the group tear itself apart
5) Take on adherents
6) Pick up stragglers
7) Excise the unconvertables

And in a few months, presto! A takeover, complete with a flaky crust
and tender crumb. Cool, frost, and serve with your favorite beverage.

*sigh*
Valete
Q. Valerius Callidus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44275 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: stop that trial, please
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Claudio Guzzo" <claudio.guzzo@...>
wrote:
>

[snip]

> Please, respect him to respect us. He is undergoing a trial for the
same reason of so many "pagan" in the past: his ideas are not common
and someone hates him.

[snip]

> Valete!
> ACC
>

Salve!

Sir, respectfully, you are factually incorrect. This citizen allegedly
performed an *act* that created a real danger to the State. For any
citizen to contact another government in any sort of negotiation on
behalf of the State, and without the authorization of the Senate is a
plain usurpation of power. Furthermore, if the allegations are true,
then our Republic, which is incorporated in the United States of
America, may be in real danger.

Furthermore, and with utmost respect, the Nova Roma position on a
number of issues is clear for all to see. Women are the equals of men,
violence and force of arms are unacceptable and so forth. Citizens are
free to feel however they wish on these topics, but for any citizen to
work to overturn any of these principles would be to undermine some of
our basic principles. Again, it is not the holding of opinions, but
the acts that flow from them that would not be acceptable.

Undiluted liberty of thought and act is an admirable notion, and to
live in a world of clear and absolute certainly would make life
simpler for us all, but I will leave you with the words of Cicero,
from De Officiis:


"For it often happens, owing to exceptional circumstances, that what
is accustomed under ordinary circumstances to be considered morally
wrong is found not to be morally wrong. For the sake of illustration,
let us assume some particular case that admits of wider application -
what more atrocious crime can there be than to kill a fellow-man, and
especially an intimate friend? But if anyone kills a tyrant - be he
never so intimate a friend - he has not laden his soul with guilt, has
he? The Roman People, at all events, are not of that opinion; for of
all glorious deeds they hold such an one to be the most noble."

Optime vale

M. Lucretius Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44276 From: Decimus Valerius Thomas Brunus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Arriving
A. Tullia Scholastica,

> ATS: This is a matter in which one comparatively new citizen has been
> accused of being a Nazi and of having contacted government agencies in
that
> capacity regarding Nova Roma. The trial was aborted after opening
statements
> on both sides. Only one citizen is involved, so I would hardly call this
> National Socialist manifestations in Nova Roma, even if these accusations
had
> been proven.

I know quite well how Nazi feelings can jeopardize the development of a
micronational society, and also throw what once was an harmonious community
into an anxious quarrel. Here in Brazil I am citizen to a micronation which
brings its ideals from the II German Empire, and we have already seen some
individuals who sought to re-enact elements from Hitlerism within the
political-partidary scene. It is something that we have learned how to
combat. However, we must be always aware of the fact that the Law allows
everyone to think as they will, and forbiding someone of doing it might be
enormously harmful to the whole Juridical Order of the State.

> Periodically, we have outbreaks of temper on this list, which is one of
> the reasons why we suggest that new citizens like yourself subscribe to
the
> NewRoman list instead, so that you can learn about Nova Roma from
magistrates
> and magisterial assistants without having to face such outbursts. Not
> everyone seems to be aware that adults discuss matters in a calm and
reasoned
> tone while refraining from attacking others.

Having outbreaks of temper - believe me - is a compulsory degree to all
those who are portuguese-speaking micronationalists, specially Brazilians.
Since spying, hacking, "micro-terrorism", personal verbal attacks and
international conflicts are here things as usual as the daily change of our
underware, we have thus become quite acquainted to ill-tempered situations -
unfortunately. Happily, this panorama is exactly what my lusophone
micronation and other Govts. are trying to change.

> ATS: And I welcome you, too. We had some discussions in the censor¹s
> office about your name...

Well... that's nice - I think. In fact, I really had quite a debate with A.
Horatius Severus (who was helping me through the process) about it. ;-)

> ATS: This is quite pretty...

Someone translated the Brazilian National Anthem into Latin, and I found
that work at Orkut. I can send you the complete text, if you want.

Greetings,

Decimus Valerius Thomas Brunus
Brasilia Provincia

Brasilia, aeterni amoris fiat symbolum,
Quod affers tecum, labarum stellatum,
En dicat aurea viridisque flammula
Ventura pax decusque superatum.
- Hymnus Brasiliensis



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of A. Tullia Scholastica
Sent: sexta-feira, 9 de junho de 2006 03:38
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Arriving



> A. Tullia Scholastica D. Valerio Thomae Bruno quiritibus, sociis,
> peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
>
> Sir,
>
> About the scandal you've mentioned, I could only aprehend, so far, that it
> has something to do with national-socialist manifestations whithin Nova
> Roma, but I'll be soon looking for related messafes in the archives of our
> mailgroup. In the meanwhile, I'd be glad if you could make me a short
report
> about the case.
>
> ATS: This is a matter in which one comparatively new citizen has been
> accused of being a Nazi and of having contacted government agencies in
that
> capacity regarding Nova Roma. The trial was aborted after opening
statements
> on both sides. Only one citizen is involved, so I would hardly call this
> National Socialist manifestations in Nova Roma, even if these accusations
had
> been proven.
>
> Periodically, we have outbreaks of temper on this list, which is one of
> the reasons why we suggest that new citizens like yourself subscribe to
the
> NewRoman list instead, so that you can learn about Nova Roma from
magistrates
> and magisterial assistants without having to face such outbursts. Not
> everyone seems to be aware that adults discuss matters in a calm and
reasoned
> tone while refraining from attacking others.
>
> Thank you for the wellcoming answer, by the way. ;-)
>
> ATS: And I welcome you, too. We had some discussions in the censor¹s
> office about your name...
>
> Decimus Valerius Thomas Brunus
> Brasilia Provincia
>
> Brasilia, aeterni amoris fiat symbolum,
> Quod affers tecum, labarum stellatum,
> En dicat aurea viridisque flammula
> Ventura pax decusque superatum.
> - Hymnus Brasiliensis
>
> ATS: This is quite pretty...
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica

We Made Changes

Your Yahoo! Groups email is all new.

Learn
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJsaDdjNjVyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzEEZ3JwSW
QDNjI4ODAzOQRncnBzcElkAzE2MDAzMTM3MTIEc2VjA25jbW9kBHNsawNpbmZvBHN0aW1lAzExND
k4MzE1MzQ-;_ylg=1/SIG=11gd5l5o4/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/local/newemail.h
tml> More

Share
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJtZ2RlbmRwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzIEZ3JwSW
QDNjI4ODAzOQRncnBzcElkAzE2MDAzMTM3MTIEc2VjA25jbW9kBHNsawNmZGJjawRzdGltZQMxMT
Q5ODMxNTM0;_ylg=1/SIG=11im36rmb/**http%3a//surveylink.yahoo.com/wix/p1412899
.aspx> Feedback

Recent Activity

*

7
New
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJmcWVrdWdnBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyOD
gwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNjAwMzEzNzEyBHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZtYnJzBHN0aW1lAzExNDk4MzE1Mz
Q-;_ylg=1/SIG=11kc45afr/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/members>
Members

Visit
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJldGM0ZWltBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyOD
gwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNjAwMzEzNzEyBHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZnaHAEc3RpbWUDMTE0OTgzMTUzNA
--;_ylg=1/SIG=11cha5fmj/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> Your
Group
SPONSORED LINKS

* Ancient
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJjbzZjc3FkBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzEEZ3JwSW
QDNjI4ODAzOQRncnBzcElkAzE2MDAzMTM3MTIEc2VjA3NsbW9kBHN0aW1lAzExNDk4MzE1MzQ-;_
ylg=1/SIG=17atb3e3v/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/gads%3ft=ms%26k=Ancient%2bhi
story%26w1=Ancient%2bhistory%26w2=Citizenship%2btest%26w3=Nova%26w4=Us%2bcit
izenship%2btest%26w5=Citizenship%2btest%2bquestions%26c=5%26s=110%26g=2%26.s
ig=8Ilpn0_IsTZ3IW30ijIYcw> history

* Citizenship
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJjOTljbDN1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzIEZ3JwSW
QDNjI4ODAzOQRncnBzcElkAzE2MDAzMTM3MTIEc2VjA3NsbW9kBHN0aW1lAzExNDk4MzE1MzQ-;_
ylg=1/SIG=17bkaesbu/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/gads%3ft=ms%26k=Citizenship%
2btest%26w1=Ancient%2bhistory%26w2=Citizenship%2btest%26w3=Nova%26w4=Us%2bci
tizenship%2btest%26w5=Citizenship%2btest%2bquestions%26c=5%26s=110%26g=2%26.
sig=c5LF3cNG8UTLo7XcWWUSTg> test

* Nova
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJjNGRpM21sBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzMEZ3JwSW
QDNjI4ODAzOQRncnBzcElkAzE2MDAzMTM3MTIEc2VjA3NsbW9kBHN0aW1lAzExNDk4MzE1MzQ-;_
ylg=1/SIG=16t0t7q43/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/gads%3ft=ms%26k=Nova%26w1=An
cient%2bhistory%26w2=Citizenship%2btest%26w3=Nova%26w4=Us%2bcitizenship%2bte
st%26w5=Citizenship%2btest%2bquestions%26c=5%26s=110%26g=2%26.sig=L4fWpmFdf1
7NVNypI3vMLg>

* Us
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJjbWxydTFnBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzQEZ3JwSW
QDNjI4ODAzOQRncnBzcElkAzE2MDAzMTM3MTIEc2VjA3NsbW9kBHN0aW1lAzExNDk4MzE1MzQ-;_
ylg=1/SIG=17g2oo92c/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/gads%3ft=ms%26k=Us%2bcitizen
ship%2btest%26w1=Ancient%2bhistory%26w2=Citizenship%2btest%26w3=Nova%26w4=Us
%2bcitizenship%2btest%26w5=Citizenship%2btest%2bquestions%26c=5%26s=110%26g=
2%26.sig=k8R4ykfFSJlo7Se4zV8Mxw> citizenship test

* Citizenship
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJjMDY2OW9qBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzUEZ3JwSW
QDNjI4ODAzOQRncnBzcElkAzE2MDAzMTM3MTIEc2VjA3NsbW9kBHN0aW1lAzExNDk4MzE1MzQ-;_
ylg=1/SIG=17nqt39a3/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/gads%3ft=ms%26k=Citizenship%
2btest%2bquestions%26w1=Ancient%2bhistory%26w2=Citizenship%2btest%26w3=Nova%
26w4=Us%2bcitizenship%2btest%26w5=Citizenship%2btest%2bquestions%26c=5%26s=1
10%26g=2%26.sig=oQMuP6HasbSURCT0zszwtw> test questions

.

<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714&grpId=6288039&grpspId=1600313712&msgId
=44266&stime=1149831534>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44277 From: dicconf Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: stop that trial, please
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, M. Lucretius Agricola wrote:

> Furthermore, and with utmost respect, the Nova Roma position on a
> number of issues is clear for all to see. Women are the equals of men,
> violence and force of arms are unacceptable and so forth. Citizens are
> free to feel however they wish on these topics, but for any citizen to
> work to overturn any of these principles would be to undermine some of
> our basic principles. Again, it is not the holding of opinions, but
> the acts that flow from them that would not be acceptable.

In the specific case of Naziism, I recollect, surrender terms were signed
back in 1945 under which the display of the (German) Nazi flag or the
wearing of the uniform of any of the German armed forces were outlawed and
violators subject to summary arrest and punishment. (IIRC this has never
been done since the collapse of the Nazi state, though some of the kookier
leftists like John Boardman have proposed that anyone perpetrating such a
display could lawfully be shot down on the spot.)

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44278 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: NOVO ROMAN EVENTS IN HISPANIA
Salvete

it is an honor for me to communicate that the Province Hispania of Nova Roma
will participate this weekend in a reenactment event in the city of Leon
(founded by Legio VII) that is attracting the glances of the Spanish press
and the television .

At bottom of this post I copypasted the first press article (sorry only in
spanish).I have translated the part where one mentions Nova Roma:

"By second consecutive year, the members of Legio VIIII Hispana will put
atrezzo. They belong to the Spanish branch of an international organization
denominated Nova Roma, whose objective is the conservation and
reconstruction of the culture of Old Rome. They make, they construct and
they acquire equipment that, with the greater possible fidelity, allows them
to act like authentic Roman legionaries. Like peculiar data: the Legio VII
Gemina and VIIII the Hispanic got to cross themselves in Britania…"

And this afternoon the Praefectus Castrorum of Legio VIIII Hispana will be
interviewed by the television.

Valete bene

M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
PROPRÆTOR·HISPANIÆ
SCRIBA·CENSORIS·GEM
CAPVT·OFFICINA·APPROBATIONVM
ACCENSVS·CONSVL·PMS
NOVA·ROMA
http://commentariola.blogspot.com


----- Original Message -----
From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
To: nrhispania@yahoogroups.com
Cc: nrlatinamerica@yahoogroups.com ; laslegionesderoma@... ;
locosporlahistoria@... ; impromano ; LegioVIIII@yahoogroups.com ;
historiaviva@...
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 10:53 AM
Subject: [NRHispania] [COMMENTARIOLA HISPANIAE] Leon


La Legio VII celebra su natalicio montando un campamento en el Cid

http://www.diariodeleon.es/se_cultura/noticia.jsp?CAT=114&TEXTO=4842252

El Club de Prensa del Diario de León también se hace romano con un ciclo de
conferencias
Promonumenta ha organizado para mañana un desfile de romanos por el centro
de León

Un puñado de hombres -apenas los que caben en un contubernia (barracón)-
asaltarán mañana la ciudad, incluida la Via Principalis (calle Ancha).
Ataviados con cascos, corazas y espadas desfilarán en memoria de aquellos
que hace ahora 1.938 años habitaban en un campamento que con el tiempo sería
origen de la ciudad de León. Son simples aficionados. Miembros de una
moderna legión llamada Legio VIIII (escrito así) Hispana, que se dedican a
recrear el mundo romano. Saldrán de la plaza del Grano y se detendrán en las
criptas de Cascalerías y la Catedral, que conservan restos de las termas y
del anfiteatro, y llegarán hasta el jardín del Cid. Será aquí, un día
después, donde montarán un auténtico campamento, para mostrar a los
ciudadanos como vivían y cómo peleaban sus antepasados romanos. Un
campamento abierto a todo el público que quiera participar.

Y todo ello porque el 10 de junio del año 68 de nuestra era nacía la Legio
VII, una de las pocas legiones de las que se sabe con precisión su fecha de
fundación. El aniversario ha sido celebrado puntualmente por la asociación
Promonumenta, que desde hace seis años envuelve esta fecha de
reivindicaciones en pro del legado que los romanos dejaron a la ciudad y a
la provincia. A partir de mañana Promonumenta llenará la ciudad de romanos
para festejar el llamado natalicio de las águilas -nombre que procede de los
estandartes que portaba el ejército romano y que, precisamente, se
custodiaban en los Principia (el cuartel general), cuyos restos se
encontraron en un solar de la calle San Pelayo que lleva meses envuelto en
la polémica-.

El intrigante

Servio Sulpicio Galba. Con semejante nombre, el gobernador de la Hispania
Tarraconensis estaba predestinado a pasar a la historia como un intrigante.
En el año 68, (un 10 de junio), este mandatario de Roma crea la Legio VII
con el fin último de dar un golpe de Estado y destituir al emperador. La
Legio VII, tras saquear la capital del Imperio y otras escaramuzas en las
fronteras centroeuropeas, se asienta definitivamente en el año 74 en lo que
con el tiempo sería la ciudad de León.

Promonumenta rinde honores a aquel destacamento de 6.000 hombres, la mayoría
reclutados entre los hispanos, que se acantonan entre los ríos Bernesga y
Torío. También la asociación, en colaboración con el Diario de León, ha
preparado un ciclo de conferencias y una exposición filatélica sobre el
mundo romano; tan próximo y, al mismo tiempo, desconocido por quienes hoy
habitan dentro de las murallas que ellos levantaron y en la cannaba que hace
casi dos milenios acogía a la población civil.

Una asociación guerrera

Por segundo año consecutivo, los miembros de la Legio VIIII Hispana pondrán
el atrezzo. Pertenecen a la rama española de una organización internacional
denominada Nova Roma, cuyo objetivo es la conservación y reconstrucción de
la cultura de la Antigua Roma. Fabrican, construyen y adquieren equipo que,
con la mayor fidelidad posible, les permite actuar como auténticos
legionarios romanos. Como dato curioso: la Legio VII Gemina y la VIIII
Hispana llegaron a cruzarse en Britania...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44279 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: NOVO ROMAN EVENTS IN HISPANIA
SALVETE !

Hispanians, amici ! We wish you a great time there. Congratulations
for your wonderful dedication.
Greetings from me, Romeo and Marcus.

VALETE,
IVL SABINVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
<complutensis@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete
>
> it is an honor for me to communicate that the Province Hispania of
Nova Roma
> will participate this weekend in a reenactment event in the city
of Leon
> (founded by Legio VII) that is attracting the glances of the
Spanish press
> and the television .
>
> At bottom of this post I copypasted the first press article (sorry
only in
> spanish).I have translated the part where one mentions Nova Roma:
>
> "By second consecutive year, the members of Legio VIIII Hispana
will put
> atrezzo. They belong to the Spanish branch of an international
organization
> denominated Nova Roma, whose objective is the conservation and
> reconstruction of the culture of Old Rome. They make, they
construct and
> they acquire equipment that, with the greater possible fidelity,
allows them
> to act like authentic Roman legionaries. Like peculiar data: the
Legio VII
> Gemina and VIIII the Hispanic got to cross themselves in BritaniaÂ…"
>
> And this afternoon the Praefectus Castrorum of Legio VIIII Hispana
will be
> interviewed by the television.
>
> Valete bene
>
> M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
> PROPRÆTOR·HISPANIÆ
> SCRIBA·CENSORIS·GEM
> CAPVT·OFFICINA·APPROBATIONVM
> ACCENSVS·CONSVL·PMS
> NOVA·ROMA
> http://commentariola.blogspot.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
> To: nrhispania@yahoogroups.com
> Cc: nrlatinamerica@yahoogroups.com ; laslegionesderoma@... ;
> locosporlahistoria@... ; impromano ; LegioVIIII@yahoogroups.com ;
> historiaviva@...
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 10:53 AM
> Subject: [NRHispania] [COMMENTARIOLA HISPANIAE] Leon
>
>
> La Legio VII celebra su natalicio montando un campamento en el Cid
>
> http://www.diariodeleon.es/se_cultura/noticia.jsp?
CAT=114&TEXTO=4842252
>
> El Club de Prensa del Diario de León también se hace romano con un
ciclo de
> conferencias
> Promonumenta ha organizado para mañana un desfile de romanos por
el centro
> de León
>
> Un puñado de hombres -apenas los que caben en un contubernia
(barracón)-
> asaltarán mañana la ciudad, incluida la Via Principalis (calle
Ancha).
> Ataviados con cascos, corazas y espadas desfilarán en memoria de
aquellos
> que hace ahora 1.938 años habitaban en un campamento que con el
tiempo sería
> origen de la ciudad de León. Son simples aficionados. Miembros de
una
> moderna legión llamada Legio VIIII (escrito así) Hispana, que se
dedican a
> recrear el mundo romano. Saldrán de la plaza del Grano y se
detendrán en las
> criptas de Cascalerías y la Catedral, que conservan restos de las
termas y
> del anfiteatro, y llegarán hasta el jardín del Cid. Será aquí, un
día
> después, donde montarán un auténtico campamento, para mostrar a
los
> ciudadanos como vivían y cómo peleaban sus antepasados romanos. Un
> campamento abierto a todo el público que quiera participar.
>
> Y todo ello porque el 10 de junio del año 68 de nuestra era nacía
la Legio
> VII, una de las pocas legiones de las que se sabe con precisión su
fecha de
> fundación. El aniversario ha sido celebrado puntualmente por la
asociación
> Promonumenta, que desde hace seis años envuelve esta fecha de
> reivindicaciones en pro del legado que los romanos dejaron a la
ciudad y a
> la provincia. A partir de mañana Promonumenta llenará la ciudad de
romanos
> para festejar el llamado natalicio de las águilas -nombre que
procede de los
> estandartes que portaba el ejército romano y que, precisamente, se
> custodiaban en los Principia (el cuartel general), cuyos restos se
> encontraron en un solar de la calle San Pelayo que lleva meses
envuelto en
> la polémica-.
>
> El intrigante
>
> Servio Sulpicio Galba. Con semejante nombre, el gobernador de la
Hispania
> Tarraconensis estaba predestinado a pasar a la historia como un
intrigante.
> En el año 68, (un 10 de junio), este mandatario de Roma crea la
Legio VII
> con el fin último de dar un golpe de Estado y destituir al
emperador. La
> Legio VII, tras saquear la capital del Imperio y otras escaramuzas
en las
> fronteras centroeuropeas, se asienta definitivamente en el año 74
en lo que
> con el tiempo sería la ciudad de León.
>
> Promonumenta rinde honores a aquel destacamento de 6.000 hombres,
la mayoría
> reclutados entre los hispanos, que se acantonan entre los ríos
Bernesga y
> Torío. También la asociación, en colaboración con el Diario de
León, ha
> preparado un ciclo de conferencias y una exposición filatélica
sobre el
> mundo romano; tan próximo y, al mismo tiempo, desconocido por
quienes hoy
> habitan dentro de las murallas que ellos levantaron y en la
cannaba que hace
> casi dos milenios acogía a la población civil.
>
> Una asociación guerrera
>
> Por segundo año consecutivo, los miembros de la Legio VIIII
Hispana pondrán
> el atrezzo. Pertenecen a la rama española de una organización
internacional
> denominada Nova Roma, cuyo objetivo es la conservación y
reconstrucción de
> la cultura de la Antigua Roma. Fabrican, construyen y adquieren
equipo que,
> con la mayor fidelidad posible, les permite actuar como auténticos
> legionarios romanos. Como dato curioso: la Legio VII Gemina y la
VIIII
> Hispana llegaron a cruzarse en Britania...
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44280 From: Brutus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
Salve Fabi Maxime!

With all due respects it is not a question of Consul Modianus 'cherrypicking' certain beliefs as being undesirable. Some beliefs and actions taken to support them ARE unacceptable in any civilised community. I would include among them the supression or extermination of large swathes of society on the basis of gender or race. I'm loath to get too involved in this but I am uncomfortable with the trial's outcome and was pretty well in support of the Consul's initial attempt to get Claudius Priscus thrown out. In ancient times there were plenty of examples of undesirables being stripped of their citizenship and sent into exile when their presence was deemed to threaten the wellbeing of the City as a whole. The mullets are very good in Massilia after all.

Vale!

Caius Moravius Brutus

QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
In a message dated 6/8/2006 5:24:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
tau.athanasios@... writes:
A Nova Roma event is being held, and a citizen is giving a workshop
(lecture) on Rome and during the course of the lecture starts to illustrate
how Nazi Germany was a modern day Rome and emphasises that it was "very
similar to Nova Roma and what our goals are...," and proceeds to show the
similarity in symbols like the fasces or equates the Schutzstaffel (SS) to a
sort of "Praetorian Guard." And glorifies the exploits of the Nazi regime
and tries to link Nazi idealogy with that of Nova Roma through common
symbols.
Consul,
<<An open comment to the Consul>>
You are reaching here and you know it. Equitius Cato is right, and you are
wrong.

To use your example against you, what if a Consul of Nova Roma gave a
demonstration and said that NR should be modernized, the laws changed to reflect the
21st century following
English common law et al. Why that Consul would just be as guilty as that
Nazi lecturer
would be wouldn't he? Most white supremacists follow Germany since they were
able to accomplish their goal under a dictator. The fact that the 1000 year
Empire broke up after Germany was defeated, matters little to them, it is the
ideal. It has nothing to do with the Roman symbol of curial authority.

Until Nova Roma gets that dictator, and we become white supremacists I
wouldn't worry.
But with you cherry picking beliefs as being undesirable, and issuing edicts
against them, we are well on our way aren't we?

Valete
Q. Fabius Maximus
In Nova Roma

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






"It's all right,lads: the chickens say it's going to be all right..."

The Emperor Claudius
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44281 From: ancientworldbooks Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Ancient World Books: June's Acquisitions of Books for Sale.
Salvete Omnes,

Let us introduce ourselves, we (Ancient World Books --
www.ancientworldbooks.com ) are a scholarly online used bookstore
specializing in Roman and Greek history. Our newest list of titles
have been posted for sale under the Recent Acquisitions link at our
website, www.ancientworldbooks.com . There are some unusual titles
this month, feel free to browse our website. For further descriptions
regarding the condition and contents of any book, feel free to click
on the link to the recent acquisitions: http://tinyurl.com/euayn

Orders may be placed by phone, fax, mail, or email. It is quickest to
confirm availability and order through our secure website at
www.ancientworldbooks.com - you can locate the book and add it to your
shopping cart by a keyword search or by browsing the website:
www.ancientworldbooks.com

If you're interested in Roman History titles please click on our Roman
History category at our website or click on the link:
http://tinyurl.com/mxsxc

Also browse our other categories as well.
We have many more books unlisted, please check often as we upload new
inventory.

Valete,
Shalender Jolly
www.ancientworldbooks.com
info@...
416-739-1983 (tel. & fax)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44282 From: jrzblackshirt Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Fascism
Salve!

I am new to this forum and my citizenship is still pending in Nova
Roma. I hope this post does not ruin my opportunity to attain
citizenship.

It should be noted that Fascism and National Socialism are not the
same isms nor do they share the same beliefs.

It could also be said that Rome was a Fascist-like state.

As Nova Roma allows a personal expression in the private practice of
religion it must allow a freedom of political viewpoint. This
includes a viewpoint that some may find distasteful. I do not think
it is the intent of Nova Roma to be censor of ones private political
views.

The actions of the accused as to wrongly speaking for or pubically
representing Nova Roma are another matter and seperate from whatever
their political views may be. These seperate lines seem to be
entangled.

Vale!

Brian Phillips
Citizenship Pending # 10196
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44283 From: gaiusequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Fascism
C. Equitius Cato Brian Philips quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

Brian Philips scripsit:

"The actions of the accused as to wrongly speaking for or pubically
representing Nova Roma are another matter and seperate from whatever
their political views may be. These seperate lines seem to be
entangled."

Exactly. That is the point I have been trying to make since the
problem first reared its ugly head. This has been exacerbated by the
edict promulgated by the consul, which I believe violates our right,
guaranteed as citizens of the Republic by the lex Constitutiva, to
engage in "unrestricted" speech. Freedom of speech means *all*
speech, not just the kinds of speech we may personally agree with or
enjoy hearing. As the famous saying goes:

"Monsieur l'abbé, I detest what you write, but I would give my life to
make it possible for you to continue to write." - Voltaire, letter to
M. le Riche (February 6, 1770)

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44284 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - On Fascism
To place this in a macro-national context for comparison purposes only.

1) In the United States ALL political speech is protected including but not
limited to: Nazi ideology, racism, and "religionism". This includes but is
not limited to political speech in which one writes a letter to a
representative of a foreign government in which you identify yourself as an
American Citizen adhering to racist or Nazi ideology. No ifs ands or buts;
it is protected. (see US Constitution - First Amendment)

2) In Europe and Canada MOST political speech is tolerated, this generally
excludes Nazi ideology, racism, and "religionism." In some places you can
be fined in other places jailed. If you don't believe me, try goose
stepping while doing the straight arm salute and singing Deutchland Uberalis
along the Champs Elysees or in front of the Bundestag.

So the question is does Nove Roma's constitution protect ALL political speech,
or tolerate MOST political speech. That is really the only question. Once
that question is answered, then you can get down to having some really fun
arguments. You can argue about which political speech is tolerated and
which is not. You can then argue about who gets to make these decisions.
You can argue about whether speech outside NR, can be punished within NR.
You can then argue about whether these decisions can be Ex Post Facto, i.e.
can a citizen be punished for saying something that was not on the "Speech
Not Tolerated List" at the time it was said but was later added to this
list. You can argue about whether an official list should be kept ,or
whether these decisions should be made arbitrarily every time someone says
something you find intolerable.

These arguments can be lots of fun.
--
>|P. Dominus Antonius|<
Tony Dah m

Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius
Islam religio pacis, nex omnibus dissentint.


On 6/9/06, Brutus <crwbanmor@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Fabi Maxime!
>
> With all due respects it is not a question of Consul Modianus
> 'cherrypicking' certain beliefs as being undesirable. Some beliefs and
> actions taken to support them ARE unacceptable in any civilised community. I
> would include among them the supression or extermination of large swathes of
> society on the basis of gender or race. I'm loath to get too involved in
> this but I am uncomfortable with the trial's outcome and was pretty well in
> support of the Consul's initial attempt to get Claudius Priscus thrown out.
> In ancient times there were plenty of examples of undesirables being
> stripped of their citizenship and sent into exile when their presence was
> deemed to threaten the wellbeing of the City as a whole. The mullets are
> very good in Massilia after all.
>
> Vale!
>
> Caius Moravius Brutus
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44285 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Happy Vestalia to all!
Salvete,

Lucia Modia Lupa and I agree that the best way to celebrate Vestalia is to enjoy the words of Publius Ovidius Naso, known to one and all as Ovid.
Happy Vestalia to everyone, especially to all the women and girls of Nova Roma!

Valete in pace Deorum,

Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis

"Nihil apud Romanos Templo Vestae sanctius habetur."
"To the Romans the Temple of Vesta was the most sacred."



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


9 June

Vesta, be favorable. To you I now open my lips in devotions,
if I am permitted to come to your ritual.
While absorbed in prayer I felt a divine presence
and the floor shone joyously with purple light.
Of course I didn't see you - so long, poetic license
you are not a Goddess for a man to behold,
but I've learned with no human teacher what I didn't know
while confusion had me in its grip.
When Rome had passed forty anniversaries, people say
that a shrine welcomed the Goddess who keeps the flame,
the project of that peace-loving king, the most God-fearing soul
ever produced by the Sabine territory.
The roofs of bronze you see today were then straw-thatched,
and the walls were plaited from pliant wattles.
This tiny spot, the site of the Vestals' official residence,
was then the palace of King Numa the long-beard.
But the shape of the temple, which survivies to this day, was there before,
they say, and a commendable reason is behind that shape.
Vesta and the Earth are the same; behind both is an unsleeping fire.
The Earth is like a ball, completely unsupported,
its heavy weight hanging in the air beneath it.
Rotation itself balances the sphere and holds it up:
there are no corners to weigh down any side.
Situated as it is in the central region of the universe,
so it doesn't touch any side more than another,
if it were not curved, it would be one side's closer neighbor,
and the universe wouldn't have Earth as its weighty center.
There's a globe suspended in space by Archimedes' know-how,
a tiny model of the measureless heavens,
where the Earth is equidistant from its top and its bottom.
The spherical shape makes such a thing possible.
Vesta's temple looks the same. Not a single corner
sticks out, and the dome protects it from the rain.
Why do virgin attendants minister to the Goddess, you ask?
For this too I'll find the proper explanation.
Juno and Ceres, they say, were sired on Rhea
by Saturn; Vesta was the third daughter.
The first two wed, we hear that the first two gave birth.
Of the three, only one remained inexperienced with men.
No wonder that a virgin is delighted by a virgin attendant
and welcomes chaste hands to her rites.
Don't imagine that Vesta is anything but living flame;
you won't see a single substance born from flame.
And so She's rightly a virgin, She produces nor receives
any seeds, and She loves Her virgin associates.
For quite a while I stupidly thought there were statues of Vesta.
I soon learned there weren't any in the domed rotunda.
A fire that never goes out is hidden in that temple;
neither Vesta nor the fire has a single likeness.
The earth is very stable. From being very stable, Vesta gets Her name,
as in Greek She's Hestia from Her heavy resting.
The hearth is named for its hearty warmth that heartens all,
but it used to be at the front of the house.
From this I believe the "vestibule" derives, and praying
with a preamble to Vesta, who occupies first place.

It once was the custom to sit before the hearth on benches
and believe one's Gods were present at the table.
Even today when the rites of ancient Vacuna take place,
one stands and sits before Vacuna's hearth.
A bit of archaic custom has come down to the present age:
a clean little dish brings the food offered to Vesta.
Look at the bread hanging down from garlanded asses,
and wreaths of flowers festooning rough millstones.
The early peasants used ovens only for toasting barley
(the goddess of ovens has rites of her own):
the hearth itself got the bread ready, buried in the ashes,
with a broken roof-tile laid on the warm ground.
And so the baker honors the hearth and our Lady of Hearths
and the ass that turns the volcanic millstones.
Ruddy Priapus, should I bypass your disgrace, or recount it?
It's a little story with a lot of laughs.
With Her turreted crown in place on Her forehead, Cybele
invited the immortal Gods to Her feast.
She invited both the satyrs and those rural spirits, the nymphs;
Silenus was there without an invitation.
It's prohibited and would be protracted to describe divine banquets:
they stayed up all night with lots of wine.
Some were roaming aimlessly in the hollows of shady Ida,
others lay down and relaxed on the soft grass;
some made merry, some were asleep; others linked arms
and stamped a quick three-step on the verdant ground.
Vesta lay down and took a peaceful nap without a care,
just as She was, with Her head pillowed on the turf.
But the ruddy garden scarecrow went prowling for nymphs and goddesses,
directing his roaming steps back and forth.
He glimpsed Vesta: maybe he thought She was a nymph or maybe
he knew She was Vesta, but he says he didn't.
He got a nasty notion, and tried to approach stealthily,
making his way on tiptoe with pounding heart.
Old man Silenus had happened to leave the ass he had ridden
by the banks of a gently babbling stream.
The God of the long Hellespont was making a move to get started
when that creature brayed an untimely blast.
The deep sound frightened the Goddess awake. The whole crowd flocked
together, the villain escaped amidst threatening hands.
At Lampsacus it's the custom to slaughter this beast for Priapus, singing,
"We fittingly offer a tattler's guts to the flames."
But Vesta, You gratefully deck it with necklaces of bread.
Work stops, and the idle mills fall silent.
Now I'll tell the meaning of the altar on the Thunderer's stronghold
for Iupiter the Baker, more notable for its name than its cost.
The Capitoline was hemmed in and hard-pressed by savage Gauls:
a siege of long standing had caused starvation.
Iupiter summoned the celestials to His royal throne and said
"Commence" to Mars, who reported at once:
"Of course the state of their distress is unknown to you
and this heartache of mine needs to voice a complaint.
But if you demand a concise account of their shameful distress,
the Alpine foe has brought Rome to her knees.
This is the city you would put in command of the earth?
Just now she crushed the nearby towns and Etruscan forces;
hope was full speed. Now she's been driven from her home.
I have witnessed old men in their bronze-fitted courtyards meet death
decked in the regalia of their past triumphs.
I have witnessed the talismans of Trojan Vesta moved from Her dwelling
to safety. Romans of course suppose Gods are somebodies.
But if they looked around at the stronghold where you reside
and all your homes hard-pressed by the siege,
they would know that no help is left to repay concern for the Gods
and that incense offered with a careful hand is a waste.
If only a chance to fight would appear. Let them take up arms
and if they can't prevail, let them fall.
But now, without food and afraid of inglorious death, cooped up
on their hill they're hard-pressed by the barbarian horde."
Then Venus, and Quirinus splendid with augur's crook and kingly robe,
and Vesta too said much for their Latium's sake.
Iupiter replied, "Those walls concern every one of us,
and vanquished Gaul will pay the price.
Now Vesta, see that the enemy thinks the grain that's gone
is still left, and don't abandon your dwelling.
Whatever grain is intact, let the hollow machinery grind
and the hearth fire-harden what kneading has softened."
By the time Saturn's virgin daughter had given Her assent
to Her brother's command, the hour was midnight.
Toil had brought sleep to the Roman leaders. Thundering at them,
Iupiter revealed His will through holy lips:
"Get up and from the stronghold's heights into the enemy's midst
let loose the resource you are least willing to lose."
Sleep departed and the strange riddle drove them to seek
to surrender the resource as ordered against their will.
It appeared to be bread, so they threw down the bounty of Ceres.
What they threw clanged on helmets and long shields.
There went the hope of starving them out. When the enemy had been routed,
a splendid altar was out up for Iupiter the Baker.

I happened to be heading home on Vesta's holiday by the staircase
that has recently linked New Street to the Roman Forum.
I observed a lady climbing down this way barefooted.
Unable to speak, I stopped in my tracks.
An old woman from the neighborhood noticed, told me to sit down,
and said as her head shook and her voice trembled:
"This area where the fora are today was occupied by sodden swamps;
the storm sewer was soggy with the river's overflow.
Lake Curtius over there, the site of altars high and dry,
now solid ground, was a lake before.
The regular route for the parade to the Circus through the Velabrum
district was nothing but willows and hollow reeds.
Often a reveller heading home by the city's waterway
would sing and make drunken remarks to the boatmen.
Yonder God, Vertumnus, hadn't yet taken a name from averting
the stream, that also fits His versatile shapes.
Here too there was a grove thick with canes and rushes,
and a swamp you wouldn't approach with your shoes still on.
The pools have receded and the banks keep their waters in,
and now it's dry ground, but that custom survives."
That explained that. "Goodbye, my dear old woman," I said.
"May what's left of your life be entirely easy."

The rest of the story I learned long ago in the time of my boyhood,
but I mustn't omit it on that account.
Ilus, great-grandson of Dardanus, had just constructed new walls
(Ilus the rich still controlled the East).
People believe a heaven-sent statue of Minerva in arms
landed on the slopes of the city of Ilium.
I was anxious to see it: I saw the temple and its environs;
that's still over there, but Rome has the Palladium.
When the Trojans consulted Apollo, from His shady grove darkly
He gave this response with lips that do not lie:
"Keep safe the Goddess from heaven, and you'll keep your city safe.
Authority over this area goes where She does."
Ilus kept Her safe by shutting Her away atop his stronghold,
and this concern passed on to his heir Laomedon.
In Priam's reign She was not kept safe enough, as was Her will
after Her beauty lost out in that contest.
They say She was stolen. Maybe Adrastus' grandson did it,
or Ulysses, the proficient trickster, or Aeneas.
The culprit is uncertain, the object is at Rome, safeguarded by Vesta
because She sees everything by Her constant light.

Oh how frightened the senators were, when Vesta's temple caught
fire, and She almost was buried by her very own roof!
It was a blaze of hallowed fires and fires accursed,
a blend of flames profane and sacred.
The dumbstruck Vestals undid their hair and wept:
fright itself had taken their strength.
Into their midst flew Metellus, who said at the top of his voice,
"Come help; weeping won't do any good.
Pick up the talismans of destiny in your virgin fingers.
Not your prayers but your hands must carry them off.
Woe is me! Why hesitate?" He saw them hesitate
and go down in terror on bended knee.
He scooped up holy water, raised his hands, and said, "Forgive me,
as a man I shall enter where a man must not go.
Let Rome be absolved by the loss of my life."
He spoke and burst in: the Goddess he carried off approved his deed,
and was kept safe by Her chief priest's service.
Now, holy flames, in Augustus' reign you shine as you should:
the fire on the hearth from Troy is here to stay.
There won't be any record in this leader's reign of a priestess
sullying her vows, nor buried alive in the ground.
That's how an unchaste one dies, buried in what she's profaned:
the Earth and Vesta are the same divinity.

This is the day a Brutus earned his title by staining
Spanish soil with the blood of Callaican foes.
As the saying goes, joy is sometimes alloyed with sorrow
to keep the people from whole-hearted celebration.
At the Euphrates Crassus lost standards, son and troops,
and was himself the last to die.
"Parthian, why gloat?" said Nemesis. "You are going to return the standards
and an avenger will make Crassus' murderes pay."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

From Ovid's "Fasti - Roman Holidays," translated by Betty Rose Nagle, 1995 ed.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44288 From: C·ARMINIVS·RECCANELLVS Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Errata - EDICTVM•PROPRÆTORICIVM•XXIX (A C•ARMINIVS•RECCANELLVS
EDICTVM•PROPRÆTORICIVM•XXIX (A C•ARMINIVS•RECCANELLVS XI)
CAIVS•ARMINIVS•RECCANELLVS•PROPRÆTOR•BRASILIƕOMNIBVS•CIVIBUS•S•P•D

By this edictum, and using my Imperium (given to me by Senatus and
Populus Romanum), I decide:

Because the new citizens have been demonstrating many interests on
the brazilian provincial jobs, I revoke the antiquity necessary for
the functions of LEGATVS INTERNIS REBVS, LEGATVS EXTERNIS REBVS and
PROCURATOR RETIS, as prescripted by EDICTVM·PROPRÆTORICIVM·XXIII (A
C·ARMINIVS·RECCANELLVS V).

In this way, any brazilian citizen, independently of antiquity, can
be nomeated to those functions.

Sorry my real very bad english!

DATVM•SVB•MANV•MEA•A•D•V•ID•IVNIAS•MMDCCLIX•A•V•C
GAIO•FABIO•BUTEONE•MODIANO•POMPEIA•MINUCIA-TIBERIA•STRABONE•CONSULIBUS

C•ARMINIVS•RECCANELLVS
PROPRAETOR•PROVINCIAE•BRASILIAE
QUAESTOR•NOVAE•ROMAE
SCRIBA
"Quousque tandem, Lula, abutere patientia nostra?"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44289 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Happy Vestalia to all!
> Salve, Maxima Valeria Messallina amica, et salvete, omnes!
>
> Happy Vestalia to you as well! I enjoyed reading your posts on this
> subject.
>
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
>
> Salvete,
>
> Lucia Modia Lupa and I agree that the best way to celebrate Vestalia is to
> enjoy the words of Publius Ovidius Naso, known to one and all as Ovid.
> Happy Vestalia to everyone, especially to all the women and girls of Nova
> Roma!
>
> Valete in pace Deorum,
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
> Sacerdos Vestalis
>
> "Nihil apud Romanos Templo Vestae sanctius habetur."
> "To the Romans the Temple of Vesta was the most sacred."
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> 9 June
>
> Vesta, be favorable. To you I now open my lips in devotions,
> if I am permitted to come to your ritual.
> While absorbed in prayer I felt a divine presence
> and the floor shone joyously with purple light.
> Of course I didn't see you - so long, poetic license
> you are not a Goddess for a man to behold,
> but I've learned with no human teacher what I didn't know
> while confusion had me in its grip.
> When Rome had passed forty anniversaries, people say
> that a shrine welcomed the Goddess who keeps the flame,
> the project of that peace-loving king, the most God-fearing soul
> ever produced by the Sabine territory.
> The roofs of bronze you see today were then straw-thatched,
> and the walls were plaited from pliant wattles.
> This tiny spot, the site of the Vestals' official residence,
> was then the palace of King Numa the long-beard.
> But the shape of the temple, which survivies to this day, was there before,
> they say, and a commendable reason is behind that shape.
> Vesta and the Earth are the same; behind both is an unsleeping fire.
> The Earth is like a ball, completely unsupported,
> its heavy weight hanging in the air beneath it.
> Rotation itself balances the sphere and holds it up:
> there are no corners to weigh down any side.
> Situated as it is in the central region of the universe,
> so it doesn't touch any side more than another,
> if it were not curved, it would be one side's closer neighbor,
> and the universe wouldn't have Earth as its weighty center.
> There's a globe suspended in space by Archimedes' know-how,
> a tiny model of the measureless heavens,
> where the Earth is equidistant from its top and its bottom.
> The spherical shape makes such a thing possible.
> Vesta's temple looks the same. Not a single corner
> sticks out, and the dome protects it from the rain.
> Why do virgin attendants minister to the Goddess, you ask?
> For this too I'll find the proper explanation.
> Juno and Ceres, they say, were sired on Rhea
> by Saturn; Vesta was the third daughter.
> The first two wed, we hear that the first two gave birth.
> Of the three, only one remained inexperienced with men.
> No wonder that a virgin is delighted by a virgin attendant
> and welcomes chaste hands to her rites.
> Don't imagine that Vesta is anything but living flame;
> you won't see a single substance born from flame.
> And so She's rightly a virgin, She produces nor receives
> any seeds, and She loves Her virgin associates.
> For quite a while I stupidly thought there were statues of Vesta.
> I soon learned there weren't any in the domed rotunda.
> A fire that never goes out is hidden in that temple;
> neither Vesta nor the fire has a single likeness.
> The earth is very stable. From being very stable, Vesta gets Her name,
> as in Greek She's Hestia from Her heavy resting.
> The hearth is named for its hearty warmth that heartens all,
> but it used to be at the front of the house.
> From this I believe the "vestibule" derives, and praying
> with a preamble to Vesta, who occupies first place.
>
> It once was the custom to sit before the hearth on benches
> and believe one's Gods were present at the table.
> Even today when the rites of ancient Vacuna take place,
> one stands and sits before Vacuna's hearth.
> A bit of archaic custom has come down to the present age:
> a clean little dish brings the food offered to Vesta.
> Look at the bread hanging down from garlanded asses,
> and wreaths of flowers festooning rough millstones.
> The early peasants used ovens only for toasting barley
> (the goddess of ovens has rites of her own):
> the hearth itself got the bread ready, buried in the ashes,
> with a broken roof-tile laid on the warm ground.
> And so the baker honors the hearth and our Lady of Hearths
> and the ass that turns the volcanic millstones.
> Ruddy Priapus, should I bypass your disgrace, or recount it?
> It's a little story with a lot of laughs.
> With Her turreted crown in place on Her forehead, Cybele
> invited the immortal Gods to Her feast.
> She invited both the satyrs and those rural spirits, the nymphs;
> Silenus was there without an invitation.
> It's prohibited and would be protracted to describe divine banquets:
> they stayed up all night with lots of wine.
> Some were roaming aimlessly in the hollows of shady Ida,
> others lay down and relaxed on the soft grass;
> some made merry, some were asleep; others linked arms
> and stamped a quick three-step on the verdant ground.
> Vesta lay down and took a peaceful nap without a care,
> just as She was, with Her head pillowed on the turf.
> But the ruddy garden scarecrow went prowling for nymphs and goddesses,
> directing his roaming steps back and forth.
> He glimpsed Vesta: maybe he thought She was a nymph or maybe
> he knew She was Vesta, but he says he didn't.
> He got a nasty notion, and tried to approach stealthily,
> making his way on tiptoe with pounding heart.
> Old man Silenus had happened to leave the ass he had ridden
> by the banks of a gently babbling stream.
> The God of the long Hellespont was making a move to get started
> when that creature brayed an untimely blast.
> The deep sound frightened the Goddess awake. The whole crowd flocked
> together, the villain escaped amidst threatening hands.
> At Lampsacus it's the custom to slaughter this beast for Priapus, singing,
> "We fittingly offer a tattler's guts to the flames."
> But Vesta, You gratefully deck it with necklaces of bread.
> Work stops, and the idle mills fall silent.
> Now I'll tell the meaning of the altar on the Thunderer's stronghold
> for Iupiter the Baker, more notable for its name than its cost.
> The Capitoline was hemmed in and hard-pressed by savage Gauls:
> a siege of long standing had caused starvation.
> Iupiter summoned the celestials to His royal throne and said
> "Commence" to Mars, who reported at once:
> "Of course the state of their distress is unknown to you
> and this heartache of mine needs to voice a complaint.
> But if you demand a concise account of their shameful distress,
> the Alpine foe has brought Rome to her knees.
> This is the city you would put in command of the earth?
> Just now she crushed the nearby towns and Etruscan forces;
> hope was full speed. Now she's been driven from her home.
> I have witnessed old men in their bronze-fitted courtyards meet death
> decked in the regalia of their past triumphs.
> I have witnessed the talismans of Trojan Vesta moved from Her dwelling
> to safety. Romans of course suppose Gods are somebodies.
> But if they looked around at the stronghold where you reside
> and all your homes hard-pressed by the siege,
> they would know that no help is left to repay concern for the Gods
> and that incense offered with a careful hand is a waste.
> If only a chance to fight would appear. Let them take up arms
> and if they can't prevail, let them fall.
> But now, without food and afraid of inglorious death, cooped up
> on their hill they're hard-pressed by the barbarian horde."
> Then Venus, and Quirinus splendid with augur's crook and kingly robe,
> and Vesta too said much for their Latium's sake.
> Iupiter replied, "Those walls concern every one of us,
> and vanquished Gaul will pay the price.
> Now Vesta, see that the enemy thinks the grain that's gone
> is still left, and don't abandon your dwelling.
> Whatever grain is intact, let the hollow machinery grind
> and the hearth fire-harden what kneading has softened."
> By the time Saturn's virgin daughter had given Her assent
> to Her brother's command, the hour was midnight.
> Toil had brought sleep to the Roman leaders. Thundering at them,
> Iupiter revealed His will through holy lips:
> "Get up and from the stronghold's heights into the enemy's midst
> let loose the resource you are least willing to lose."
> Sleep departed and the strange riddle drove them to seek
> to surrender the resource as ordered against their will.
> It appeared to be bread, so they threw down the bounty of Ceres.
> What they threw clanged on helmets and long shields.
> There went the hope of starving them out. When the enemy had been routed,
> a splendid altar was out up for Iupiter the Baker.
>
> I happened to be heading home on Vesta's holiday by the staircase
> that has recently linked New Street to the Roman Forum.
> I observed a lady climbing down this way barefooted.
> Unable to speak, I stopped in my tracks.
> An old woman from the neighborhood noticed, told me to sit down,
> and said as her head shook and her voice trembled:
> "This area where the fora are today was occupied by sodden swamps;
> the storm sewer was soggy with the river's overflow.
> Lake Curtius over there, the site of altars high and dry,
> now solid ground, was a lake before.
> The regular route for the parade to the Circus through the Velabrum
> district was nothing but willows and hollow reeds.
> Often a reveller heading home by the city's waterway
> would sing and make drunken remarks to the boatmen.
> Yonder God, Vertumnus, hadn't yet taken a name from averting
> the stream, that also fits His versatile shapes.
> Here too there was a grove thick with canes and rushes,
> and a swamp you wouldn't approach with your shoes still on.
> The pools have receded and the banks keep their waters in,
> and now it's dry ground, but that custom survives."
> That explained that. "Goodbye, my dear old woman," I said.
> "May what's left of your life be entirely easy."
>
> The rest of the story I learned long ago in the time of my boyhood,
> but I mustn't omit it on that account.
> Ilus, great-grandson of Dardanus, had just constructed new walls
> (Ilus the rich still controlled the East).
> People believe a heaven-sent statue of Minerva in arms
> landed on the slopes of the city of Ilium.
> I was anxious to see it: I saw the temple and its environs;
> that's still over there, but Rome has the Palladium.
> When the Trojans consulted Apollo, from His shady grove darkly
> He gave this response with lips that do not lie:
> "Keep safe the Goddess from heaven, and you'll keep your city safe.
> Authority over this area goes where She does."
> Ilus kept Her safe by shutting Her away atop his stronghold,
> and this concern passed on to his heir Laomedon.
> In Priam's reign She was not kept safe enough, as was Her will
> after Her beauty lost out in that contest.
> They say She was stolen. Maybe Adrastus' grandson did it,
> or Ulysses, the proficient trickster, or Aeneas.
> The culprit is uncertain, the object is at Rome, safeguarded by Vesta
> because She sees everything by Her constant light.
>
> Oh how frightened the senators were, when Vesta's temple caught
> fire, and She almost was buried by her very own roof!
> It was a blaze of hallowed fires and fires accursed,
> a blend of flames profane and sacred.
> The dumbstruck Vestals undid their hair and wept:
> fright itself had taken their strength.
> Into their midst flew Metellus, who said at the top of his voice,
> "Come help; weeping won't do any good.
> Pick up the talismans of destiny in your virgin fingers.
> Not your prayers but your hands must carry them off.
> Woe is me! Why hesitate?" He saw them hesitate
> and go down in terror on bended knee.
> He scooped up holy water, raised his hands, and said, "Forgive me,
> as a man I shall enter where a man must not go.
> Let Rome be absolved by the loss of my life."
> He spoke and burst in: the Goddess he carried off approved his deed,
> and was kept safe by Her chief priest's service.
> Now, holy flames, in Augustus' reign you shine as you should:
> the fire on the hearth from Troy is here to stay.
> There won't be any record in this leader's reign of a priestess
> sullying her vows, nor buried alive in the ground.
> That's how an unchaste one dies, buried in what she's profaned:
> the Earth and Vesta are the same divinity.
>
> This is the day a Brutus earned his title by staining
> Spanish soil with the blood of Callaican foes.
> As the saying goes, joy is sometimes alloyed with sorrow
> to keep the people from whole-hearted celebration.
> At the Euphrates Crassus lost standards, son and troops,
> and was himself the last to die.
> "Parthian, why gloat?" said Nemesis. "You are going to return the standards
> and an avenger will make Crassus' murderes pay."
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> From Ovid's "Fasti - Roman Holidays," translated by Betty Rose Nagle, 1995
> ed.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44290 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: [Fwd: petition in favor of Classics in Portugal]
Salve consul!

A citizen GN. EQVIT MARINUS called me an idiot. I have all this in my PC.
According to the laws of Portugal he committed a crime " Queixa crime por difamação". I want him in the portugues court. Do I need a lawier of Nova Roma or can I trust in my own lawier? In any case he must appear in portugues court because I already advanced with my legal action. Will he appear or do we need an Interpol?

Gaius Cassius Piso

"David Kling (Modianus)" <tau.athanasios@...> escreveu:
Salvete:

Classics are an important academic discipline. I signed the petition, and
it only took a minute or two.

Valete:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 6/9/06, Caius Curius Saturninus <c.curius@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Here is a petition in favour of Classicis teaching in Portugal. At
> the website mentioned in the message there's further information and
> you can read the petition.
>
> Valete,
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > A PETITION IN FAVOR OF CLASSICS IN PORTUGAL
> >
> > Dear Colleagues and Friends
> >
> > Classics in Portugal are by now suffering their greatest attack in
> > many
> > years. Help us to fight against this cultural narrowness of our
> > politics, by signing and sending to others, mainly to the members of
> > FIEC, the Petition in Favor of Classical Languages en Portugal:
> >
> > http://www.PetitionOnline.com/classici/petition.html
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





__________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44291 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: RESIGNATION OF CITIZENSHIP!
Gaius Cassius Piso omnibus S.P.D

SALVETE QUIRITES!

I, Gaius Cassius Piso, citizen of Nova-Roma, in the province of Hispania, officialy present my resignation of citizenship of Nova-Roma.
I had promised to not send any more post on this list, but this one I have to send.
Saturninus and some others manifested their anxiety about the classic studies in Portugal...
My wife is a teacher here in Portugal. NOW THE FACT IS: a majority of portugues students can't read, write or speak portugues correctly when they enter in university! A greate part of their parents are illiterate! And You are worried about the latin studies???
You are collecting signatures to resolve a problem which starts from the moment when a child enters at school?
Well... you can do it. But do You think that after what happend with the FARSE OF TRIAL of Claudius Priscus, a Nova-Roma has any credibility here in Portugal?
In Portugal we still have a mass-media!!!!!!!!!
And now, Cato, Step into the spotlights and defend my right of expression!!!
Shame on You!
I don´t want my name which I appriciate to be connected with nazis. Did I make myself clear? I don´t want to be member of Nova-Roma or any other institution connected to Nova-Roma!
There are people who say that they will go away. I don´t believe. For those who protected a Nazi I have nothing to say. For those who remained silent, I hope you open your eyes before it's too late. And for those who tried to do something, may God protect you...
I just want to express my respect before Tribunus Militaris Octavianus Ir. of the Legio VIIII Hispanica and Censor Germanicus.
I'm out! Ok?

Valete bene!
Gaius Cassius Piso.
Lusitania.
Caius urius Saturninus <c.curius@...> escreveu:
Salvete omnes,

Here is a petition in favour of Classicis teaching in Portugal. At
the website mentioned in the message there's further information and
you can read the petition.

Valete,

Begin forwarded message:

> A PETITION IN FAVOR OF CLASSICS IN PORTUGAL
>
> Dear Colleagues and Friends
>
> Classics in Portugal are by now suffering their greatest attack in
> many
> years. Help us to fight against this cultural narrowness of our
> politics, by signing and sending to others, mainly to the members of
> FIEC, the Petition in Favor of Classical Languages en Portugal:
>
> http://www.PetitionOnline.com/classici/petition.html
>
> Thanking you all in advance,
>
> Francisco de Oliveira, Full Professor of Classics and President of
> Euroclassica
>
> NOTA BENE:
> If you want to hear later from us and get a feedback on the outcome of
> this petition, when signing it, please check the box ³Available to
> Petition Author² regarding your email address options.
>
> Si vous désirez recevoir plus tard un message avec l¹information
> sur les
> résultats de cette petition sélectionnez cochez s.v.p. la case
> ³Available to Petition Author² dans le panneau d¹affichage des options
> concernant l¹adresse de votre courier électronique.
>
> Se desejar receber posteriormente da parte dos promotores alguma
> informação acerca dos resultados da petição, por favor, ao entrar na
> página de subscrição, seleccione a opção ³Available to Petition
> Author²
> no item respeitante ao seu endereço de correio electrónico.

Caius Curius Saturninus

Propraetor Provinciae Thules
Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova

"All we need is lightning
With power and might
Striking down the prophets of false
As the moon is rising
Give us the sign
Now let us rise up in awe"

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org
gsm: +358-50-3315279
fax: +358-9-8754751

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





__________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44292 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: [Fwd: petition in favor of Classics in Portugal]
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus is one of our Censors. I do not believe he called
you "an idiot." I believe it is possible you might have misunderstood
communication from him. Regarding the laws of Portugal, I suggest you talk
to someone who specializes in Portugese law.

Good day.

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 6/9/06, kari piessa <legio_x_equitata@...> wrote:
>
> Salve consul!
>
> A citizen GN. EQVIT MARINUS called me an idiot. I have all this in my PC.
> According to the laws of Portugal he committed a crime " Queixa crime por
> difamação". I want him in the portugues court. Do I need a lawier of Nova
> Roma or can I trust in my own lawier? In any case he must appear in
> portugues court because I already advanced with my legal action. Will he
> appear or do we need an Interpol?
>
> Gaius Cassius Piso
>
> "David Kling (Modianus)" <tau.athanasios@...<tau.athanasios%40gmail.com>>
> escreveu:
>
> Salvete:
>
> Classics are an important academic discipline. I signed the petition, and
> it only took a minute or two.
>
> Valete:
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44293 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Gaius Cassius Piso
Salve Gaius Cassius Piso

"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law
and justice he is the worst". Aristotle

I am sorry you have resigned your citizenship.

NO ONE in Nova Roma wants a Nazi or Communist or any other
totalitarian ideologies in Nova Roma. These ideologies are ALL
incompatible with Roman virtue, culture and history.

The totalitarian ideologies try to gain power by pushing a nation to
disregard its own laws. Once a people or government have ignored
their own laws enough a totalitarian party has a better chance of
coming to power.

In the 1920's and early 1930's had German government officials
ENFORCED the laws on the books neither the Nazis nor the Communists
would have come to power and 50 million people would not have died
as a result of Hitlers murderous reign .

Totalitarian political parties do not believe in the rule of law
they believe in the rule of might over right.

If you truly want to prevent totalitarian ideologies from spreading
their hate in Nova Roma the best method is the

Rule of law.


"The magistrates are the ministers for the laws, the judges their
interpreters, the rest of us are servants of the law, that we all
may be free." Marcus Tullius Cicero


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44294 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Salve Paetor Tiberi!

Well spoken and researched! I only hope that people who resign don't
unsubscribe right away; I'd hate to see you get writers cramp for
nothing (ie for a person gone off list) but then again we can all
learn a little from your missive!

Regards,

QSP




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tiberius Galerius Paulinus"
<spqr753@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Gaius Cassius Piso
>
> "At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from
law
> and justice he is the worst". Aristotle
>
> I am sorry you have resigned your citizenship.
>
> NO ONE in Nova Roma wants a Nazi or Communist or any other
> totalitarian ideologies in Nova Roma. These ideologies are ALL
> incompatible with Roman virtue, culture and history.
>
> The totalitarian ideologies try to gain power by pushing a nation
to
> disregard its own laws. Once a people or government have ignored
> their own laws enough a totalitarian party has a better chance of
> coming to power.
>
> In the 1920's and early 1930's had German government officials
> ENFORCED the laws on the books neither the Nazis nor the
Communists
> would have come to power and 50 million people would not have died
> as a result of Hitlers murderous reign .
>
> Totalitarian political parties do not believe in the rule of law
> they believe in the rule of might over right.
>
> If you truly want to prevent totalitarian ideologies from
spreading
> their hate in Nova Roma the best method is the
>
> Rule of law.
>
>
> "The magistrates are the ministers for the laws, the judges their
> interpreters, the rest of us are servants of the law, that we all
> may be free." Marcus Tullius Cicero
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Praetor
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44295 From: flavius leviticus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Fascism
Salve Brian,May I be the first to actually welcome you to Nova Roma.I agree with you that many people do not know the difference between National Socialism and Fascism.As a new provisional citizen you may have missed some of the raging debate as of late.Very interesting.Apparently as far as I can tell you are able to hold whatever beliefs you choose as long as you do not pose a threat to the moral principles of Nova Roma or misrepresent The Nation of Nova Roma as one of our citizens was found to have done.I hope that you decide to stick around for awhile and really get an all around idea what Nova Roma is all about.Congradulations on taking your first step on your journey into this great Nation and what it represents .Appius Galerius Aurelianus.Semper Fidelis!

jrzblackshirt <jrzblackshirt@...> wrote:
Salve!

I am new to this forum and my citizenship is still pending in Nova
Roma. I hope this post does not ruin my opportunity to attain
citizenship.

It should be noted that Fascism and National Socialism are not the
same isms nor do they share the same beliefs.

It could also be said that Rome was a Fascist-like state.

As Nova Roma allows a personal expression in the private practice of
religion it must allow a freedom of political viewpoint. This
includes a viewpoint that some may find distasteful. I do not think
it is the intent of Nova Roma to be censor of ones private political
views.

The actions of the accused as to wrongly speaking for or pubically
representing Nova Roma are another matter and seperate from whatever
their political views may be. These seperate lines seem to be
entangled.

Vale!

Brian Phillips
Citizenship Pending # 10196





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44296 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: stop that trial, please
> Salve, Agricola, et salvete, omnes bonae voluntatis.
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Claudio Guzzo" <claudio.guzzo@...>
> wrote:
>> >
>
> [snip]
>
>> > Please, respect him to respect us. He is undergoing a trial for the
> same reason of so many "pagan" in the past: his ideas are not common
> and someone hates him.
>
>
> ATS: As a matter of fact, the trial has been aborted. Therefore, no one
> is on trial. Secondly, it is the business of the magistrates to deal with
> these issues as they see fit; if the tribuni find that there is something
> illegal about the actions of other magistrates, they will intervene, rest
> assured of that.
>
> [snip]
>
>> > Valete!
>> > ACC
>> >
>
> Salve!
>
> Sir, respectfully, you are factually incorrect. This citizen allegedly
> performed an *act* that created a real danger to the State. For any
> citizen to contact another government in any sort of negotiation on
> behalf of the State, and without the authorization of the Senate is a
> plain usurpation of power. Furthermore, if the allegations are true,
> then our Republic, which is incorporated in the United States of
> America, may be in real danger.
>
> ATS: It happens that it is indeed ACTS, not thoughts, which are at issue
> here. If the trial had gone through, that might have been clearer to the
> other ML subscribers. As is, much of what has been said has stemmed not from
> rational thought, but from emotional outbursts. These allegations remain
> unproven, but if true, they are indeed a danger to the very existence of Nova
> Roma; for that matter, if we attract an extremist group from any portion of
> the macroworld political spectrum, our existence is in danger.
>
> Agricola: Furthermore, and with utmost respect, the Nova Roma position on a
> number of issues is clear for all to see. Women are the equals of men,
> violence and force of arms are unacceptable and so forth. Citizens are
> free to feel however they wish on these topics, but for any citizen to
> work to overturn any of these principles would be to undermine some of
> our basic principles. Again, it is not the holding of opinions, but
> the acts that flow from them that would not be acceptable.
>
>
> ATS: Our citizens are supposed to obey our laws, including our
> constitution, which guarantees such rights and shuns violence. If they cannot
> live with that, they don¹t belong here. Acceptance of citizenship implies
> acceptance of our laws, and of acting in accordance with them.
>
> Agricola: Undiluted liberty of thought and act is an admirable notion,
>
> ATS: Indeed it is, but far too many confuse liberty and license in these
> matters. There is a difference, one which, however, may escape the notice of
> some. There is no such thing as absolute freedom of speech or action. To
> take one example, your right to smoke ends where the air taken in by someone
> else¹s nose begins, especially if the owner of the other nose happens to be
> asthmatic, allergic, or otherwise sensitive to smoke. In such cases, smoking
> is little different from hitting the recipient of the smoke with a baseball
> bat; both might result in death or hospitalization. There is no right to
> shout Œfire¹ in a crowded theater, and there is no right to link any
> organization with an ideology foreign to it, especially when such linkage is
> made to the government of the organization¹s host country. For example, my
> classical colleagues would not be likely to deem appropriate the efforts of a
> hypothetical member to alter the focus of our classical organizations to, say,
> promoting the cause of mathematics or physics, though there is absolutely
> nothing wrong with either mathematics or physics, or the promotion thereof;
> those disciplines and their promotion, however, simply do not belong in a
> group dedicated to classical languages. A sense of propriety is needed in
> such matters, as elsewhere in life.
>
> Agricola: and to
> live in a world of clear and absolute certainly would make life
> simpler for us all, but I will leave you with the words of Cicero,
> from De Officiis:
>
> "For it often happens, owing to exceptional circumstances, that what
> is accustomed under ordinary circumstances to be considered morally
> wrong is found not to be morally wrong. For the sake of illustration,
> let us assume some particular case that admits of wider application -
> what more atrocious crime can there be than to kill a fellow-man, and
> especially an intimate friend? But if anyone kills a tyrant - be he
> never so intimate a friend - he has not laden his soul with guilt, has
> he? The Roman People, at all events, are not of that opinion; for of
> all glorious deeds they hold such an one to be the most noble."
>
> Optime vale
>
> M. Lucretius Agricola
>
> Optime vale et valete,
>
> Scholastica



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44297 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Senatus Consultum de Re Publica Defendenda
Salve Consul Pompeia Minucia Tiberia

Who said in part

Pompeia: Uh huh. Some scholars will sail in that boat. Others
will say such, but equally speculate that the inappropriate and/or
partisan use of the Tribune veto carte blanc may have influenced the
unfortunate turn of events of the late republic. Google around a
bit, or perhaps you have, in your capacity as Tribune in 2004. But
one doesn't really have to go that far back in history to find some
rather blistering examples of this, really.

If I am reading this correctly you are of the opinion that in addition
to the misuse of the Senatus Consultum de Re Publica Defendenda
by the last generation of the Roman Republic blame should also be
placed on the " inappropriate and/or partisan use of the Tribune
veto" during the same time frame.

If this is so we are in complete agreement!

Few leading men of this generation were inclined to moderation.
Both sides or all side were out for total victory even if it meant no
longer adhering to the constitutional and legal restrants that had
built Rome into the state she was.

I am of the opinion, and it only an opinion that
Iulius Caesar did, more than many of his generation
to practise what he preached.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus







----- Original Message -----
From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia<mailto:pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 5:14 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Senatus Consultum de Re Publica Defendenda


--- Salve Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor et Salvete Omnes!

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>, "Tiberius Galerius Paulinus"
<spqr753@...> wrote: (in discussion of the Senatus Consultum Ultimum
of Cicero and its legal ramifications)

(snippage)
>
>
>
> "Gaius Julius Caesar and others argued that the consultum could
not
> override the basic laws of the Roman state, that it meant merely
> that the Consuls should do their utmost within the framework of
the
> Roman Constitution to resolve the emergency

Pompeia: And there are those who maintain that Iulius Caesar would
had done well to practise what he preached :>)

The matter of law would
> never be settled, although Cicero would be exiled in 58 because of
> the executions (the exile was ordered by one of his political
> enemies, Publius Clodius Pulcher, and therefore should probably
not
> be seen as a completely valid response)."

Pompeia: Yes. Publius Clodius.... Which leads me in part to my
comment below.....
>
>
> The use of the Senatus consultum ultimum by the last generation of
> the Roman Republic was a major reason for it being the last
> generation of the Roman Republic.

Pompeia: Uh huh. Some scholars will sail in that boat. Others
will say such, but equally speculate that the inappropriate and/or
partisan use of the Tribune veto carte blanc may have influenced the
unfortunate turn of events of the late republic. Google around a
bit, or perhaps you have, in your capacity as Tribune in 2004. But
one doesn't really have to go that far back in history to find some
rather blistering examples of this, really.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

Valete
Pompeia
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44298 From: os390account Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: stop that trial, please
Salvete quirites,

I'm normally a quiet and patient man, but this legalistic diatribe is
fast becoming synonymous with autoerotic asphyxiation as practiced by
teenagers, and I think it has gone on long enough.

"Facta, non verba."

I don't care what someone thinks. I care little for what they say. I
DO care greatly about what they DO. So, if you're gonna spend all day
debating in a vacuum, then what's the point? This is not the Academy
or the Stoa, is it? This is the Forum.

"Lauda palam, admone secrete."

If there is an issue with a DEED performed, then the censors should
simply deal with it quietly. It is unnecessary for corporate officers
of a company to explain every detail of their actions to the staff.
It is nice when they do, but not required.

The situation of A.C.P. is one in which an ACTION was purported to
have taken place, in violation of company policy. Other than that the
legal department might be called in, immediate at-will termination
would have taken place. I think we're rather forgiving here, since
all this has been "dismissed."

The current furor is untenable to many citizens, and the internal
politics spilling onto the forums is possibly fomenting an exodus
movement among both the new and the old.

Rein it in, folks. Rein it in.

Valete,
Quintus Valerius Callidus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44299 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: [Fwd: petition in favor of Classics in Portugal]
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, kari piessa <legio_x_equitata@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve consul!
>
> A citizen GN. EQVIT MARINUS called me an idiot. I have all this in
my PC.
>


M. Lucretius Agricola C. Cassio Pisoni S.P.D.

Only you know what was said, and I cannot say that you are wrong. I
can say that I know Cn. Equitius Marinus and I cannot bring myself to
believe that he is a man who would call anyone an idiot. I am not sure
that you understood him rightly.

I hope you can resolve this issue in a peaceful and satisfactory way.

Optime vale
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44300 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF CITIZENSHIP!
SALVE CASSI PISO !

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, kari piessa <legio_x_equitata@...>
wrote:
> I, Gaius Cassius Piso, citizen of Nova-Roma, in the province of
Hispania, officialy present my resignation of citizenship of Nova-
Roma.
> I had promised to not send any more post on this list, but this
one I have to send.
> Saturninus and some others manifested their anxiety about the
classic studies in Portugal...>>>>

I signed the petition, too. But not from anxiety. As time as NR is a
organization with a definite purpose : " dedicated to the
restoration of classical Roman religion, CULTURE and virtues " I
will sign that petitions. Is our heritage. We must do something for
it.
More, as an individual, so long as, I belive in roman culture and
tradition, I will sign petitions in classic studies favour.


> My wife is a teacher here in Portugal. NOW THE FACT IS: a
majority of portugues students can't read, write or speak portugues
correctly when they enter in university! A greate part of their
parents are illiterate! And You are worried about the latin
studies???>>>

Yes, I'm worried. For that I'm here. To be worried. If I was member
of organizations, let's say, for peace, against wars, to save
whales, I was worried, too.
Sure we live in a great world. With a lot of problems. But these
problems are oversee by the specific organizations. Nova Roma is a
specific organization. One of his purpose is that : to protect the
roman heritage. Include here the latin studies. That is one of our
job. Inter alia.
Look ! In 2003 the nova romans joined and signed the petition to
save Alburnus Maior, the antic roman mines from my country. It was a
small contribution. But add Green Peace, the Academy support and
finaly the Govern support, and the result it was that the process of
destruction was stopped.
In 2003 the Magna Mater Project started. It was a simple ideea. But
in years, with the novi romani dedication, the Project growing up.
Day by day. And we can talk here a lot.

> You are collecting signatures to resolve a problem which starts
from the moment when a child enters at school?
> Well... you can do it. But do You think that after what happend
with the FARSE OF TRIAL of Claudius Priscus, a Nova-Roma has any
credibility here in Portugal?>>>

It wasn't a farse. Your perspective is an individual one. Try to
look from the state perspective and then maybe you will be able to
understand ours magistrates decisions.

> In Portugal we still have a mass-media!!!!!!!!!
> And now, Cato, Step into the spotlights and defend my right of
expression!!!>>>

I'm sorry because you can't understand Cato. He is subtile. When you
are looking to the three, he is able to see all the forest. And
viceversa.

> Shame on You!>>>

For what ? Be serious !

> I don´t want my name which I appriciate to be connected with
nazis.>>>

It seems you are a fan of this quote : "ab uno disce omnes".


Did I make myself clear? I don´t want to be member of Nova-Roma or
any other institution connected to Nova-Roma! >>>

Another : "Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" -
Appius Claudius.

> There are people who say that they will go away. I don´t
believe. For those who protected a Nazi I have nothing to say. For
those who remained silent, I hope you open your eyes before it's too
late. And for those who tried to do something, may God protect you...

You see ? With your resignation you choose the easy way. Try to
think, what was happened if Horati, Manlius Capitolinus,Camillus or
better yours ancestors from Saguntum resigned ?

> I just want to express my respect before Tribunus Militaris
Octavianus Ir. of the Legio VIIII Hispanica and Censor Germanicus.
> I'm out! Ok? >>>

Me, too. Esspecially because they are here.

VALE OPTIME,
IVL SABINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44301 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: [Fwd: petition in favor of Classics in Portugal]
Salve Agricola,

M. Lucretius Agricola wrote:

> I can say that I know Cn. Equitius Marinus and I cannot bring myself to
> believe that he is a man who would call anyone an idiot. I am not sure
> that you understood him rightly.

In fact he did not understand me. Thank you for your kind words.

What I did say to this person, in a private note, was that a public post
of resignation has no legal meaning. He will have to write to the
censors at censores@... in order to resign. After several
exchanges along these lines, with him continually insisting that I was
censoring him, I asked him if he was always this stupid, or if he had
practiced.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44302 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
SALVE GALERI PAULINE!

I liked your frase of Aristotle. I studied a cultural anthopology and the only thing I have to say: I'm out.
Marinus can do whatewer he likes to do to censure my my e-mails ( And there were many of them censured) to hide my convictions from the public.... ( It is a shame because one day he will have to respond ).
I will go on and charge Marinus in the portuguesl court as " queixa crime por difamação ". He will be notified to be presenr in the tribunal., if he doesn't appear, he will be brought to tribunal with handcuffs ( by Interpol ) .
Marinus, this time you met someone who will make you to wish to NEVER BEEN BORN!
Gaius Cassius Piso
.

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus <spqr753@...> escreveu:
Salve Gaius Cassius Piso

"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law
and justice he is the worst". Aristotle

I am sorry you have resigned your citizenship.

NO ONE in Nova Roma wants a Nazi or Communist or any other
totalitarian ideologies in Nova Roma. These ideologies are ALL
incompatible with Roman virtue, culture and history.

The totalitarian ideologies try to gain power by pushing a nation to
disregard its own laws. Once a people or government have ignored
their own laws enough a totalitarian party has a better chance of
coming to power.

In the 1920's and early 1930's had German government officials
ENFORCED the laws on the books neither the Nazis nor the Communists
would have come to power and 50 million people would not have died
as a result of Hitlers murderous reign .

Totalitarian political parties do not believe in the rule of law
they believe in the rule of might over right.

If you truly want to prevent totalitarian ideologies from spreading
their hate in Nova Roma the best method is the

Rule of law.

"The magistrates are the ministers for the laws, the judges their
interpreters, the rest of us are servants of the law, that we all
may be free." Marcus Tullius Cicero

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetor





__________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44303 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Salve Piso.

Just a few small points of interest.

Interpol is not an agency that arrests people. It only coordinates
activities and the exchange of information between police agencies.

Also, for an arrest to occur on US soil a US local police agency or
empowered federal authority would have execute the arrest. That can
only occur when an international warrant is issued and judged
suitable for execution by the police or federal agency (they don't
want to be sued for false arrest). Once that is done a US court would
have to recognize the validity of that warrant as one suitable for
extradition. None of this will happen in this case. Period. end of
story.

No US court would ever extradite a US citizen for defamation, which
is a civil not criminal matter in the US. Also extradition is a very
very costly affair, and someone has to pay for airfares, cost of
escort officers etc. Given the circumstances I doubt your local
police agency is willing to even try, assuming they collectively went
mad and tried any of this, to see its budget sucked dry.

Consequently Marinus Censor will not be put in handcuffs, stuffed
into a plane and flown to Portugal.

I only mention this any of this so you save yourself a lot of time
and effort, and don't spend fruitless months and years at the airport
waiting for him to arrive.

Vale
Cn Iulius Caesar


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, kari piessa <legio_x_equitata@...>
wrote:
>
> SALVE GALERI PAULINE!
>
> I liked your frase of Aristotle. I studied a cultural anthopology
and the only thing I have to say: I'm out.
> Marinus can do whatewer he likes to do to censure my my e-mails (
And there were many of them censured) to hide my convictions from
the public.... ( It is a shame because one day he will have to
respond ).
> I will go on and charge Marinus in the portuguesl court as "
queixa crime por difamação ". He will be notified to be presenr in
the tribunal., if he doesn't appear, he will be brought to tribunal
with handcuffs ( by Interpol ) .
> Marinus, this time you met someone who will make you to wish to
NEVER BEEN BORN!
> Gaius Cassius Piso
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44304 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Salve Piso.

To be absolutely accurate, before someone corrects me, two or three
US states still have criminal defamation on their books as an
offence. The test of whether they are constitutional is that there be
actual malice and either a knowledge or reckless disregard for its
truth or falsity.

As Marinus Censor has stated that he simply asked you whether you
were actually stupid or had just practised to achieve that state,
then that was a question not a statement. That question is not
malicious and he was actually asking what the truth of the matter
was, thus not reckless or knowingly false.

Finally I don't think the US state Marinus Censor resides in has
criminal defamation on its statute books anymore, so your application
to extradite him would...fail.

Fascinating place Nova Roma, one learns so much.

Vale
Cn. Iulius Caesar


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
<gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Piso.
>
> Just a few small points of interest.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44305 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Salve Ganae Iuli Caesar,

Well even if this sort of fairy tale thing was remotely possible, I
think police agencies around the world would hardly make it a high
priority given the troubles on their plates from cystal meth to
terrorist plots.

Regards,

QSP




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
<gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Piso.
>
> To be absolutely accurate, before someone corrects me, two or
three
> US states still have criminal defamation on their books as an
> offence. The test of whether they are constitutional is that there
be
> actual malice and either a knowledge or reckless disregard for its
> truth or falsity.
>
> As Marinus Censor has stated that he simply asked you whether you
> were actually stupid or had just practised to achieve that state,
> then that was a question not a statement. That question is not
> malicious and he was actually asking what the truth of the matter
> was, thus not reckless or knowingly false.
>
> Finally I don't think the US state Marinus Censor resides in has
> criminal defamation on its statute books anymore, so your
application
> to extradite him would...fail.
>
> Fascinating place Nova Roma, one learns so much.
>
> Vale
> Cn. Iulius Caesar
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
> <gn_iulius_caesar@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Piso.
> >
> > Just a few small points of interest.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44306 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-06-09
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Salve amice.

You know that, i know that, I suspect Marinus knows that...further
than?? Hmmm I wonder....

It would take its place in importance slightly under:

"I lost my pet gnat in the depths of the Peruvian jungle last year.
Can I make a report in case someone hands it in?"

<<sounds of scrunching paper as it is dutifully filed in the large
metal mesh receptacle on the floor retained for such urgent and
serious matters, along with the clickty click of clasps closing on
the comfortable sleeveless white jacket>>

Vale bene
Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
(Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Ganae Iuli Caesar,
>
> Well even if this sort of fairy tale thing was remotely possible, I
> think police agencies around the world would hardly make it a high
> priority given the troubles on their plates from cystal meth to
> terrorist plots.
>
> Regards,
>
> QSP
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
> <gn_iulius_caesar@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Piso.
> >
> > To be absolutely accurate, before someone corrects me, two or
> three
> > US states still have criminal defamation on their books as an
> > offence. The test of whether they are constitutional is that
there
> be
> > actual malice and either a knowledge or reckless disregard for
its
> > truth or falsity.
> >
> > As Marinus Censor has stated that he simply asked you whether you
> > were actually stupid or had just practised to achieve that state,
> > then that was a question not a statement. That question is not
> > malicious and he was actually asking what the truth of the matter
> > was, thus not reckless or knowingly false.
> >
> > Finally I don't think the US state Marinus Censor resides in has
> > criminal defamation on its statute books anymore, so your
> application
> > to extradite him would...fail.
> >
> > Fascinating place Nova Roma, one learns so much.
> >
> > Vale
> > Cn. Iulius Caesar
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
> > <gn_iulius_caesar@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve Piso.
> > >
> > > Just a few small points of interest.
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44307 From: Decimus Valerius Thomas Brunus Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
By the way,

without any witness to verify what really happened and tell it to the judge,
his case wold be unprovable, since the validness of a single e-mail is fully
questionable and wouldn't stand before the defendant's allegations.

Vale,

Decimus Valerius Thomas Brunus
Brasilia Provincia

Brasilia, aeterni amoris fiat symbolum,
Quod affers tecum, labarum stellatum,
En dicat aurea viridisque flammula
Ventura pax decusque superatum.
- Hymnus Brasiliensis


_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Gnaeus Iulius Caesar
Sent: sábado, 10 de junho de 2006 00:03
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Gaius Cassius Piso



Salve Piso.

Just a few small points of interest.

Interpol is not an agency that arrests people. It only coordinates
activities and the exchange of information between police agencies.

Also, for an arrest to occur on US soil a US local police agency or
empowered federal authority would have execute the arrest. That can
only occur when an international warrant is issued and judged
suitable for execution by the police or federal agency (they don't
want to be sued for false arrest). Once that is done a US court would
have to recognize the validity of that warrant as one suitable for
extradition. None of this will happen in this case. Period. end of
story.

No US court would ever extradite a US citizen for defamation, which
is a civil not criminal matter in the US. Also extradition is a very
very costly affair, and someone has to pay for airfares, cost of
escort officers etc. Given the circumstances I doubt your local
police agency is willing to even try, assuming they collectively went
mad and tried any of this, to see its budget sucked dry.

Consequently Marinus Censor will not be put in handcuffs, stuffed
into a plane and flown to Portugal.

I only mention this any of this so you save yourself a lot of time
and effort, and don't spend fruitless months and years at the airport
waiting for him to arrive.

Vale
Cn Iulius Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com, kari
piessa <legio_x_equitata@...>
wrote:
>

We Made Changes

Your Yahoo! Groups email is all new.

Learn
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJsajExMWhrBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzEEZ3JwSW
QDNjI4ODAzOQRncnBzcElkAzE2MDAzMTM3MTIEc2VjA25jbW9kBHNsawNpbmZvBHN0aW1lAzExND
k5MDg1ODI-;_ylg=1/SIG=11gd5l5o4/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/local/newemail.h
tml> More

Share
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJtZ2xzMWcyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzIEZ3JwSW
QDNjI4ODAzOQRncnBzcElkAzE2MDAzMTM3MTIEc2VjA25jbW9kBHNsawNmZGJjawRzdGltZQMxMT
Q5OTA4NTgy;_ylg=1/SIG=11im36rmb/**http%3a//surveylink.yahoo.com/wix/p1412899
.aspx> Feedback

Recent Activity

*

8
New
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJmb3JxZzdqBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyOD
gwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNjAwMzEzNzEyBHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZtYnJzBHN0aW1lAzExNDk5MDg1OD
M-;_ylg=1/SIG=11kc45afr/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/members>
Members

Visit
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJlY3R2aTR2BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyOD
gwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNjAwMzEzNzEyBHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZnaHAEc3RpbWUDMTE0OTkwODU4Mw
--;_ylg=1/SIG=11cha5fmj/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma> Your
Group
SPONSORED LINKS

* Ancient
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJjOW05aXY3BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzEEZ3JwSW
QDNjI4ODAzOQRncnBzcElkAzE2MDAzMTM3MTIEc2VjA3NsbW9kBHN0aW1lAzExNDk5MDg1ODM-;_
ylg=1/SIG=17atb3e3v/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/gads%3ft=ms%26k=Ancient%2bhi
story%26w1=Ancient%2bhistory%26w2=Citizenship%2btest%26w3=Nova%26w4=Us%2bcit
izenship%2btest%26w5=Citizenship%2btest%2bquestions%26c=5%26s=110%26g=2%26.s
ig=8Ilpn0_IsTZ3IW30ijIYcw> history

* Citizenship
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJjZTBmOGZ2BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzIEZ3JwSW
QDNjI4ODAzOQRncnBzcElkAzE2MDAzMTM3MTIEc2VjA3NsbW9kBHN0aW1lAzExNDk5MDg1ODM-;_
ylg=1/SIG=17bkaesbu/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/gads%3ft=ms%26k=Citizenship%
2btest%26w1=Ancient%2bhistory%26w2=Citizenship%2btest%26w3=Nova%26w4=Us%2bci
tizenship%2btest%26w5=Citizenship%2btest%2bquestions%26c=5%26s=110%26g=2%26.
sig=c5LF3cNG8UTLo7XcWWUSTg> test

* Nova
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJjYWw3ZW85BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzMEZ3JwSW
QDNjI4ODAzOQRncnBzcElkAzE2MDAzMTM3MTIEc2VjA3NsbW9kBHN0aW1lAzExNDk5MDg1ODM-;_
ylg=1/SIG=16t0t7q43/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/gads%3ft=ms%26k=Nova%26w1=An
cient%2bhistory%26w2=Citizenship%2btest%26w3=Nova%26w4=Us%2bcitizenship%2bte
st%26w5=Citizenship%2btest%2bquestions%26c=5%26s=110%26g=2%26.sig=L4fWpmFdf1
7NVNypI3vMLg>

* Us
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJjZ2RlMWxoBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzQEZ3JwSW
QDNjI4ODAzOQRncnBzcElkAzE2MDAzMTM3MTIEc2VjA3NsbW9kBHN0aW1lAzExNDk5MDg1ODM-;_
ylg=1/SIG=17g2oo92c/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/gads%3ft=ms%26k=Us%2bcitizen
ship%2btest%26w1=Ancient%2bhistory%26w2=Citizenship%2btest%26w3=Nova%26w4=Us
%2bcitizenship%2btest%26w5=Citizenship%2btest%2bquestions%26c=5%26s=110%26g=
2%26.sig=k8R4ykfFSJlo7Se4zV8Mxw> citizenship test

* Citizenship
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJjNGxwbzZiBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzUEZ3JwSW
QDNjI4ODAzOQRncnBzcElkAzE2MDAzMTM3MTIEc2VjA3NsbW9kBHN0aW1lAzExNDk5MDg1ODM-;_
ylg=1/SIG=17nqt39a3/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/gads%3ft=ms%26k=Citizenship%
2btest%2bquestions%26w1=Ancient%2bhistory%26w2=Citizenship%2btest%26w3=Nova%
26w4=Us%2bcitizenship%2btest%26w5=Citizenship%2btest%2bquestions%26c=5%26s=1
10%26g=2%26.sig=oQMuP6HasbSURCT0zszwtw> test questions

.

<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714&grpId=6288039&grpspId=1600313712&msgId
=44303&stime=1149908583>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44308 From: causauk Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: Senatus Consultum de Re Publica Defendenda
Salve Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

I concur, Caesar, not only advocated tyranny, but practiced it.

Though, I think it unfair to forget the leaders of the Republic.

I’m sure Cato is delighted that his ultimate sacrifice seems to have
been forgotten. I’m sure Cicero doesn’t mind us forgetting how he met
his death, and I sure that all those killed in the Constitutional
Commission’s proscription are delighted; because at least Octavian
practiced what he preached.

Forgive me, if I refrain from going you in celebrating the man
responsible for the deaths of so many citizens. Forgive me, if this
rant seems harsh or unwarranted. But, as you can tell I despise
Caesar, Caesar junior and the rest of his successors.

If I may provide my thoughts on the matter, for what they’re worth:

The opinion of Caesar is trivial; he only argued that the senatus
consultum de re publica defendenda did not remove the fundamental
rights of citizens because he knew that he himself would need legal
protection in case his future scheme went wrong.

Secondly, even though the Senate sided with him, the Senate issued the
SCU so that Cicero could deal with the conspiracy… and we all know
what happened on the Node of December. After the event Cicero was
given the title: Father of his Country.

Thirdly, the only real point of contention is if the SCU allows for
summary executions of citizens, which I hope you are not intending on
doing. So not knowing the exact particulars of the case, though I
imagine its about the fascism incident… I would be of the opinion that
the SCU could allow the government to exile an individual or to revoke
citizenship.

But if that is the intent then the SCU is not necessary in order to do
so.

Sorry if the comment was pointless.

Vale

Pending Citizen/Provisional Citizen




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Consul Pompeia Minucia Tiberia
>
> Who said in part
>
> Pompeia: Uh huh. Some scholars will sail in that boat. Others
> will say such, but equally speculate that the inappropriate and/or
> partisan use of the Tribune veto carte blanc may have influenced the
> unfortunate turn of events of the late republic. Google around a
> bit, or perhaps you have, in your capacity as Tribune in 2004. But
> one doesn't really have to go that far back in history to find some
> rather blistering examples of this, really.
>
> If I am reading this correctly you are of the opinion that in addition
> to the misuse of the Senatus Consultum de Re Publica Defendenda
> by the last generation of the Roman Republic blame should also be
> placed on the " inappropriate and/or partisan use of the Tribune
> veto" during the same time frame.
>
> If this is so we are in complete agreement!
>
> Few leading men of this generation were inclined to moderation.
> Both sides or all side were out for total victory even if it meant no
> longer adhering to the constitutional and legal restrants that had
> built Rome into the state she was.
>
> I am of the opinion, and it only an opinion that
> Iulius Caesar did, more than many of his generation
> to practise what he preached.
>
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia<mailto:pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 5:14 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Senatus Consultum de Re Publica Defendenda
>
>
> --- Salve Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Praetor et Salvete Omnes!
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>,
"Tiberius Galerius Paulinus"
> <spqr753@> wrote: (in discussion of the Senatus Consultum Ultimum
> of Cicero and its legal ramifications)
>
> (snippage)
> >
> >
> >
> > "Gaius Julius Caesar and others argued that the consultum could
> not
> > override the basic laws of the Roman state, that it meant merely
> > that the Consuls should do their utmost within the framework of
> the
> > Roman Constitution to resolve the emergency
>
> Pompeia: And there are those who maintain that Iulius Caesar would
> had done well to practise what he preached :>)
>
> The matter of law would
> > never be settled, although Cicero would be exiled in 58 because of
> > the executions (the exile was ordered by one of his political
> > enemies, Publius Clodius Pulcher, and therefore should probably
> not
> > be seen as a completely valid response)."
>
> Pompeia: Yes. Publius Clodius.... Which leads me in part to my
> comment below.....
> >
> >
> > The use of the Senatus consultum ultimum by the last generation of
> > the Roman Republic was a major reason for it being the last
> > generation of the Roman Republic.
>
> Pompeia: Uh huh. Some scholars will sail in that boat. Others
> will say such, but equally speculate that the inappropriate and/or
> partisan use of the Tribune veto carte blanc may have influenced the
> unfortunate turn of events of the late republic. Google around a
> bit, or perhaps you have, in your capacity as Tribune in 2004. But
> one doesn't really have to go that far back in history to find some
> rather blistering examples of this, really.
> >
> > Vale
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
> Valete
> Pompeia
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44309 From: Kevin Landry Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF CITIZENSHIP!
Here is an interesting take on other people's beliefs by Neil Gaimen.

*Hi Neil,
I've been a fan of your work for awhile now and I just came across your
site. I've had this nagging question, about authors, stuck in my brain for
awhile now and I thought you might have an answer or opinion.
If you really enjoy an author's stories and then you find out the author
(not you) is a jerk or believes in some fairly wretched things would you
keep reading this author's works?
I suppose it's similar to the whole crazy celebrity dilema. Do I really want
to go see a movie that looks good even though that guy is in it?
Thanks,
Kyle

*If I were only allowed to read or enjoy art or listen to music made by
people whose opinions and beliefs were the same as mine, I think the world
would be a pretty dismal sort of a place. I love the work of many creators
who self-avowedly believe or believed things that I consider to be "fairly
wretched", not to mention wrong-headed, lunatic, irresponsible or simply
wrong. Worse yet: there are artists, actors, songwriters, authors, whose
work I love, like or admire and who, biographers or historians tell us,
actually *did* things that were utterly reprehensible. And worse even than
that, there are all those things by Anonymous, who could have been or
thought or done, well, *anything*, and we'll never know...

Ezra Pound was a fascist, an antisemite on a level that makes the Aryan
Nation seem wishy washy, a traitor (or at best, a collaborator), and I'm
very glad I got to read his poetry, and appreciate it and learn from it. I
could list dozens more without breaking a sweat. Most, probably all, human
beings get to do awful things and believe things that other human beings
think they should be burned for believing, and they get to do and believe
wonderful things too, and artists, writers, musicians, creators, actors, are
nothing if not human beings.

The art isn't the artist, the poem isn't the poet; trust the tale, not the
teller.

(The sad flip-side is I've met people -- writers and artists -- over the
years who I liked immediately, with whom I found myself agreeing on
everything to do with art and aesthetics so closely that we might have
shared the same head, people whose world-views were pretty much mine, whom
I'd talk with far into the night and whom I parted from excited that I'd met
them, looking forward to nothing more than reading their writing or looking
at their art... and then I would find what they had done, and, at least as
far as my taste was concerned, the books would be uninteresting, the
drawings ugly or clumsy. And in an odd way, that hurts more than liking the
work of someone who behaved badly, or thought in a way that I consider
offensive or wrong.)

http://www.neilgaiman.com/journal/2006/06/in-wee-small-hours-of-morning.html

~Marcus Octavius Taurus

On 10/06/06, Titus Iulius Sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SALVE CASSI PISO !
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, kari piessa <legio_x_equitata@...>
>
> wrote:
> > I, Gaius Cassius Piso, citizen of Nova-Roma, in the province of
> Hispania, officialy present my resignation of citizenship of Nova-
> Roma.
>>
> > I don´t want my name which I appriciate to be connected with
> nazis.>>>
>
>> > There are people who say that they will go away. I don´t
> believe. For those who protected a Nazi I have nothing to say. For
> those who remained silent, I hope you open your eyes before it's too
> late. And for those who tried to do something, may God protect you...
>
> > I just want to express my respect before Tribunus Militaris
> Octavianus Ir. of the Legio VIIII Hispanica and Censor Germanicus.
> > I'm out! Ok? >>>
>
>
> Me, too. Esspecially because they are here.
>
> VALE OPTIME,
> IVL SABINVS
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44310 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Even if Marinus Censor had made a statement rather than a question, in
general it is accepted that the truth is a complete defense. And given some
of the e-mails, I suspect that a good case could be made that there was a
factual basis for the statement, if in actuality it was a statement.

I personally think it was a question. And one that I have a growing
interest in ascertaining the answer to. Perhaps the potential litigant
would care to enlighten us on his/her internal perspective. Which is it,
natural or practise?
--
>|P. Dominus Antonius|<
Tony Dah m

Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius
Islam religio pacis, nex omnibus dissentint.

On 6/9/06, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> As Marinus Censor has stated that he simply asked you whether you were
> actually stupid or had just practised to achieve that state, then that was a
> question not a statement. That question is not malicious and he was actually
> asking what the truth of the matter was, thus not reckless or knowingly
> false.
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44311 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: RESIGNATION OF CITIZENSHIP!
> A. Tullia Scholastica T. Iulio Sabino amico quiritibus, sociis,
> peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
>
> SALVE CASSI PISO !
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , kari
> piessa <legio_x_equitata@...>
> wrote:
>> > I, Gaius Cassius Piso, citizen of Nova-Roma, in the province of
> Hispania, officialy present my resignation of citizenship of Nova-
> Roma.
>> > I had promised to not send any more post on this list, but this
> one I have to send.
>> > Saturninus and some others manifested their anxiety about the
> classic studies in Portugal...>>>>
>
> I signed the petition, too. But not from anxiety. As time as NR is a
> organization with a definite purpose : " dedicated to the
> restoration of classical Roman religion, CULTURE and virtues " I
> will sign that petitions. Is our heritage. We must do something for
> it.
> More, as an individual, so long as, I belive in roman culture and
> tradition, I will sign petitions in classic studies favour.
>
>
> ATS: And I signed it, too (what, you expected something else?).
>
>> > My wife is a teacher here in Portugal. NOW THE FACT IS: a
> majority of portugues students can't read, write or speak portugues
> correctly when they enter in university! A greate part of their
> parents are illiterate! And You are worried about the latin
> studies???>>>
>
> ATS: Yes, we are worried about Latin studies. As Aedilis Sabinus says
> below, that is part of our focus here, and something we should all be worried
> about. Moreover, studying Latin is a great benefit in understanding one¹s own
> language as well, particularly when it happens to be derived from Latin.
>
> Yes, we should worry that people enter the university ignorant of their
> native language. Will it surprise you to learn that it is not only Portuguese
> speakers who have this problem? English speakers have it, too. For that
> matter, high school English teachers in the US cannot be guaranteed to be able
> to read, write, and spell English correctly, let alone punctuate it. Likely
> their parents let them watch TV before they could read, which is always a bad
> idea. Subverting the brain¹s ability to form circuitry in the language and
> logic areas of the brain (Broca¹s area, Wernicke¹s area, etc.) is not a good
> idea, but excessive exposure to television and similar devices before full
> literacy is achieved has that effect all too often.
>
> Here, however, we have something called Literacy Volunteers, who try to
> help those who did not learn to read in childhood to acquire this very
> necessary skill. Perhaps you might like to borrow that idea.
>
>
> Sabinus: Yes, I'm worried. For that I'm here. To be worried. If I was member
> of organizations, let's say, for peace, against wars, to save
> whales, I was worried, too.
> Sure we live in a great world. With a lot of problems. But these
> problems are oversee by the specific organizations. Nova Roma is a
> specific organization. One of his purpose is that : to protect the
> roman heritage. Include here the latin studies. That is one of our
> job. Inter alia.
>
> ATS: Indeed, Sabine, that is our focus, and one of our jobs.
>
> Sabinus: Look ! In 2003 the nova romans joined and signed the petition to
> save Alburnus Maior, the antic roman mines from my country. It was a
> small contribution. But add Green Peace, the Academy support and
> finaly the Govern support, and the result it was that the process of
> destruction was stopped.
> In 2003 the Magna Mater Project started. It was a simple ideea. But
> in years, with the novi romani dedication, the Project growing up.
> Day by day. And we can talk here a lot.
>
>> > You are collecting signatures to resolve a problem which starts
> from the moment when a child enters at school?
>
> ATS: Illiteracy starts long before a child enters school. Parents must
> read to their children, and provide educational experiences as befits their
> age. And they must shut the electronic babysitter off. Some of my neighbors
> are raising their kids without TV. They must explain to the child, however
> young, what is going on, not slap him or her down with a Œshut up¹ or
> whatever. Parents who use language in the home will produce children who will
> use language later on. Parents who shake their crying babies, however, will
> produce something quite different...if the child survives. So, too, will
> parents who swat their children around for no good reason. There was a very
> useful study on this subject we read in educational sociology, by a professor
> Bernstein, if memory serves.
>
>> > Well... you can do it. But do You think that after what happend
> with the FARSE OF TRIAL of Claudius Priscus, a Nova-Roma has any
> credibility here in Portugal?>>>
>
> ATS: I wasn¹t aware that Portugal reported the doings of Nova Roma.
>
> It wasn't a farse. Your perspective is an individual one. Try to
> look from the state perspective and then maybe you will be able to
> understand ours magistrates decisions.
>
> ATS: It would have been better if the SCU or the trial would have gone to
> a vote. If all evidence had been presented, both the Senate and the iudices
> would have been able to make a proper decision based on the evidence, NOT
> emotional reactions inappropriate to human adults. It wasn¹t a farce; it was
> an abortion. A full-term result would have been better as an outcome for this
> pregnancy.
>
>> > In Portugal we still have a mass-media!!!!!!!!!
>> > And now, Cato, Step into the spotlights and defend my right of
> expression!!!>>>
>
> I'm sorry because you can't understand Cato. He is subtile. When you
> are looking to the three, he is able to see all the forest. And
> viceversa.
>
>> > Shame on You!>>>
>
> For what ? Be serious !
>
>> > I don´t want my name which I appriciate to be connected with
> nazis.>>>
>
> It seems you are a fan of this quote : "ab uno disce omnes".
>
> ATS: Which does indeed seem to be the case, but we must be vigilant lest
> others appear. I don¹t want to be associated with a great many things.
>
> Did I make myself clear? I don´t want to be member of Nova-Roma or
> any other institution connected to Nova-Roma! >>>
>
> ATS: That¹s your privilege, but you are sadly mistaken about the
> situation here.
>
> Another : "Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" -
> Appius Claudius.
>
>> > There are people who say that they will go away. I don´t
> believe. For those who protected a Nazi I have nothing to say. For
> those who remained silent, I hope you open your eyes before it's too
> late. And for those who tried to do something, may God protect you...
>
> ATS: We didn¹t protect a Nazi. As yet we have no proof, for neither the
> SCV nor the trial was allowed to proceed to its natural conclusion.
>
> You see ? With your resignation you choose the easy way. Try to
> think, what was happened if Horati, Manlius Capitolinus,Camillus or
> better yours ancestors from Saguntum resigned ?
>
> ATS: Consider, too, if those who hate Naziism and the like leave NR,
> perhaps Nazis and fascists and Communists or totalitarians or what have you
> will take over NR in time. The best way to keep that from happening is to
> stay put, and speak out...calmly. Our goals in NR are not those of these
> ideologies. Those who espouse them may find some elements here which they
> find amenable, but they cannot obey our laws, which forbid gender and
> religious discrimination, among other similar matters. Those who cannot, or
> will not, obey our laws automatically violate one of the conditions for
> citizenship, and should leave, or be removed. In this case, proof is not
> sufficient, partly because some people misunderstood the situation and
> vociferously protested procedures which are entirely legal. Perhaps if they
> had had the evidence available to the magistrates, they would have allowed
> these matters to be concluded properly so that we could all know one way or
> the other. Perhaps, too, if they had simply waited, and trusted the
> magistrates to do the right thing, the same better outcome would have
> occurred. One must not bend to every breeze, nor favor the lesser over the
> greater cause. Ne quid detrimenti capiat should be our guide, not what the
> young punk sang to Officer Krupke.
>
>> > I just want to express my respect before Tribunus Militaris
> Octavianus Ir. of the Legio VIIII Hispanica and Censor Germanicus.
>> > I'm out! Ok? >>>
>
> Me, too. Esspecially because they are here.
>
> ATS: And you should calm down and stay.
>
> VALE OPTIME,
> IVL SABINVS
>
> Valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44312 From: flavius leviticus Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Defamation of Character!
Salvete,I could be wrong,as I often times am.But the way I percieve this issue is one of subject and object.By that I mean,the subject being the defaming word, and the the object being, the necessity over a third party to be defamed in front of.Also to intentionally cause others to form an irrational,unfounded,invalid conception of the person being defamed,which in some way causes that person to suffer damage to their character therefrom.Since neither fact presents itself here it seems Piso is laboring under a false premise, since it was a private conversation between these two people, not intended for others to hear.It would seem to me Piso is causing Marinus Censor to be defamed.Maybe,in that case Piso should be charged here in civil court by Marinus Censor.Ultimately another act in the Theatre of the Absurd.Valete,Appius Galerius Aurelianus,Semper Fidelis!
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44313 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: Arriving
> Salve, D. Valeri Thomas Brune, et salvete, omnes bonae voluntatis!
>
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica,
>
>> > ATS: This is a matter in which one comparatively new citizen has been
>> > accused of being a Nazi and of having contacted government agencies in
> that
>> > capacity regarding Nova Roma. The trial was aborted after opening
> statements
>> > on both sides. Only one citizen is involved, so I would hardly call this
>> > National Socialist manifestations in Nova Roma, even if these accusations
> had
>> > been proven.
>
> I know quite well how Nazi feelings can jeopardize the development of a
> micronational society, and also throw what once was an harmonious community
> into an anxious quarrel.
>
> ATS: We have hitherto been spared such things, but it seems that we have
> attracted a rather undesirable element. Their attitudes are against our laws,
> and they are incompatible with Nova Roma.
>
>
>
> Here in Brazil I am citizen to a micronation which
> brings its ideals from the II German Empire, and we have already seen some
> individuals who sought to re-enact elements from Hitlerism within the
> political-partidary scene. It is something that we have learned how to
> combat. However, we must be always aware of the fact that the Law allows
> everyone to think as they will, and forbiding someone of doing it might be
> enormously harmful to the whole Juridical Order of the State.
>
> ATS: In this case, as has been noted earlier, actions endangering the
> welfare and existence of Nova Roma were said to have been carried out by this
> citizen. That is considerably more than thinking, but thinking incompatible
> with the laws of a voluntary organization is thinking which does not belong in
> said organization.
>
>> > Periodically, we have outbreaks of temper on this list, which is one of
>> > the reasons why we suggest that new citizens like yourself subscribe to
> the
>> > NewRoman list instead, so that you can learn about Nova Roma from
> magistrates
>> > and magisterial assistants without having to face such outbursts. Not
>> > everyone seems to be aware that adults discuss matters in a calm and
> reasoned
>> > tone while refraining from attacking others.
>
> Having outbreaks of temper - believe me - is a compulsory degree to all
> those who are portuguese-speaking micronationalists, specially Brazilians.
>
> ATS: One must learn to control one¹s temper and one¹s emotions. Not only
> do fights result from such displays, but so, too, do heart attacks and
> strokes.
>
> Since spying, hacking, "micro-terrorism", personal verbal attacks and
> international conflicts are here things as usual as the daily change of our
> underware, we have thus become quite acquainted to ill-tempered situations -
> unfortunately. Happily, this panorama is exactly what my lusophone
> micronation and other Govts. are trying to change.
>
>> > ATS: And I welcome you, too. We had some discussions in the censor¹s
>> > office about your name...
>
> Well... that's nice - I think. In fact, I really had quite a debate with A.
> Horatius Severus (who was helping me through the process) about it. ;-)
>
> ATS: AH Severus is your contact person, or assigned scriba; he handles
> Portuguese speakers. However, before he contacted you, we discussed your
> name. There are three or four Latinists in the censor¹s office who deal with
> such matters. When we are satisfied with the correctness of a name, we pass
> it on to the scriba for notification; if, however, we are unsatisfied, and
> cannot use the proposed name, it goes back to the prospective citizen for
> amendment, also via the scriba. We don¹t accept geographical names which
> denote conquest, or which are too broad, or names which signify adoption, or
> are honorific...or beyond the period of the early Empire unless they are
> Latinizations of personal or geographic names. These are more difficult to
> find in our references, which is why yours took a bit longer than some others.
>
>> > ATS: This is quite pretty...
>
> Someone translated the Brazilian National Anthem into Latin, and I found
> that work at Orkut. I can send you the complete text, if you want.
>
>
> ATS: yes, I¹d like to see that. Gratias.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Decimus Valerius Thomas Brunus
> Brasilia Provincia
>
> Brasilia, aeterni amoris fiat symbolum,
> Quod affers tecum, labarum stellatum,
> En dicat aurea viridisque flammula
> Ventura pax decusque superatum.
> - Hymnus Brasiliensis
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> Behalf
> Of A. Tullia Scholastica
> Sent: sexta-feira, 9 de junho de 2006 03:38
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Arriving
>
>> > A. Tullia Scholastica D. Valerio Thomae Bruno quiritibus, sociis,
>> > peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Sir,
>> >
>> > About the scandal you've mentioned, I could only aprehend, so far, that it
>> > has something to do with national-socialist manifestations whithin Nova
>> > Roma, but I'll be soon looking for related messafes in the archives of our
>> > mailgroup. In the meanwhile, I'd be glad if you could make me a short
> report
>> > about the case.
>> >
>> > ATS: This is a matter in which one comparatively new citizen has been
>> > accused of being a Nazi and of having contacted government agencies in
> that
>> > capacity regarding Nova Roma. The trial was aborted after opening
> statements
>> > on both sides. Only one citizen is involved, so I would hardly call this
>> > National Socialist manifestations in Nova Roma, even if these accusations
> had
>> > been proven.
>> >
>> > Periodically, we have outbreaks of temper on this list, which is one of
>> > the reasons why we suggest that new citizens like yourself subscribe to
> the
>> > NewRoman list instead, so that you can learn about Nova Roma from
> magistrates
>> > and magisterial assistants without having to face such outbursts. Not
>> > everyone seems to be aware that adults discuss matters in a calm and
> reasoned
>> > tone while refraining from attacking others.
>> >
>> > Thank you for the wellcoming answer, by the way. ;-)
>> >
>> > ATS: And I welcome you, too. We had some discussions in the censor¹s
>> > office about your name...
>> >
>> > Decimus Valerius Thomas Brunus
>> > Brasilia Provincia
>> >
>> > Brasilia, aeterni amoris fiat symbolum,
>> > Quod affers tecum, labarum stellatum,
>> > En dicat aurea viridisque flammula
>> > Ventura pax decusque superatum.
>> > - Hymnus Brasiliensis
>> >
>> > ATS: This is quite pretty...
>> >
>> > Vale, et valete,
>> >
>> > A. Tullia Scholastica



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44314 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: Skype
Salvete,

I have reinstalled Skype on my Mac. My User ID is: xnavyphotog

Valete,
Quintus Servilius Priscus(The First Priscus)


On Jun 9, 2006, at 3:26 AM, David Kling (Modianus) wrote:

Salvete:

I just downloaded and installed Skype on my computer. My user ID is:
modianus

Anyone interested in talking send me an e-mail and we can establish a
time
when it would be good to talk. I want everyone to know that they can
easily
be reached.

Valete:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Consul

On 6/8/06, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes;
> I know a lot of us have Skype which makes it easy to talk to all our
> friends who are not so far away now. But Skype just recently has a
> promotion for the U.S & Canada - you can make free calls from Skype to
> regular telphones until December 2006.
> I did not buy any Skype Out minutes and placed calls to regular
> phone numbers for $0 U.S or Canadian:)Sorry European, Mexican & South
> American cives, it is unfair...
> bene vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Yahoo! Groups Links
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44315 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Ezra Pound's citizenship was Re: RESIGNATION OF CITIZENSHIP!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Kevin Landry" <lklandry@...> wrote:
>
> Here is an interesting take on other people's beliefs by Neil Gaimen.
>
[SNIP]

>
> Ezra Pound was a fascist, an antisemite on a level that makes the Aryan
> Nation seem wishy washy, a traitor (or at best, a collaborator), and I'm
> very glad I got to read his poetry, and appreciate it and learn from it.



Salve!

If Ezra Pound were a citizen of Nova Roma he would be permitted to
think what he wanted. He would be free to write as he pleased. He
would *not* be free to use our public and official forum to disparage
any religion. He would *not* have the freedom to misrepresent Nova
Roma in public.

If Ezra Pound were a Nova Roma citizen, any other citizen could easily
have access to any of his ideas and writings at all, but to the extent
that any specific writing might violate our avowed principles of
equality and respect for all, then *not* publicly in our official
forum. He would not be permitted to make a unilateral decision to use
the name of Nova Roma (which is held as a copyright name under the
control of our Board of Directors, i.e., the Senate).

I have no idea what Ezra Pound would think of these limitations on his
liberty. I'm comfortable with them.


Optime vale

M. Lucretius Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44316 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: [Fwd: petition in favor of Classics in Portugal]
On 6/10/06, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Agricola,
>
> After several
> exchanges along these lines, with him continually insisting that I was
> censoring him, I asked him if he was always this stupid, or if he had
> practiced.


Obviously he had practiced :-)

You've never been anything but unfailingly polite to ne - even when i've
been quite dim :-)

Flavia Lucilla Merula

Chaos, confusion, disorder - my work here is done


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44317 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Iun.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem IV Idus Iunius; haec dies nefastus est.

"But once the violets are stripped from the long-eared mules,
And the rough millstones are grinding the grain again,
The sailor at the stern says: `We'll see the Dolphin,
When day is put to flight and night comes on.'" - Ovid, Fasti VI

"Dolphin: Eratosthenes and others give the following reason for the
dolphin's being among the stars. Amphitrite, when Neptunus desired to
wed her and she preferred to keep her virginity, fled to Atlas.
Neptunus sent many to seek her out, among them a certain Delphinus,
who, in his wanderings among the islands, came at last to the maiden,
persuaded her to marry Neptunus, and himself took charge of the
wedding. In return for this service, Neptunus put the form of a
dolphin among the constellations. More than this, we see that those
who make statues of Neptunus place a dolphin either in his hand or
beneath his foot – a thing they think will please the god especially."
- Hyginus, Astronomica 2.17

"The Delphines (Dolphins) both rejoice in the echoing shores and dwell
in the deep seas, and there is no sea without Delphines; for Poseidon
loves them exceedingly, inasmuch as when he was seeking Amphitrite the
dark-eyed daughter of Nereus who fled from his embraces, Delphines
marked her hiding in the halls of Okeanos and told Poseidon; and the
god of the dark hair straightway carried off the maiden and overcame
her against her will. Her he made his bride, queen of the sea, and for
their tidings he commended his kindly attendants and bestowed on them
exceeding honour for their portion." - Oppian, Halieutica 1.383

The "Dolphin" is Delphinus, a constellation whose name originated in
Greek times. Dolphins were the messengers of Neptune, and one saved
the life of Arion the musician whose lyre is represented by Lyra. It
lies in a rich area of the Milky Way and is a hunting ground for
novae. It contains nine main stars as Ovid suggests, the four main
stars forming the rectangle known as Job's coffin.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Oppian, Hyginus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44318 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Gaius Cassius Piso
GAIVS CASSIVS PISO OMNIBVS S.P.D

Today I left in Censors office a request of my citizenship in Nova Roma.
If the things heated yesterday, I from my part apology.
I can't continue in an association which goes against my moral, personal values and my honour.
I hope that all good romans understand my decision, based in my conscience.
I wish everything good to all good romans.

Valete
Gaius Cassius Piso
Provincia Hispaniae

__________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44319 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: En: Gaius Cassius Piso
Observação: mensagem anexa encaminhada.
__________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44320 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Errata - EDICTVM•PROPRÆTORICIVM•XXIX (A C•ARMIN
SALVE PROPRAETOR PROVINCIAE BRASILIAE!

Sou um simples militar na provincia de Hispania. Tenho estado ocupado para levar Claudius Priscus ao julgamento por fascismo, rasismo e misoginia.
Infelzismente não deu resulltado.
Coloco a responsabilidade nas vossas mãos porque um homem sozinho não pode tudo...
Tomem iniciativa! Mostrem ao mundo que voces são brasileiros onde todo o homem é unido! Viva Brasil! Deixem a vossa bandeira reflectir o que é um estado multicultural. Viva Brasil! Viva Portugal!

Vale et valete bene!
Gaius Casius Piso,
Lusitania.




C·ARMINIVS·RECCANELLVS <c.arminius.reccanellus@...> escreveu:
EDICTVM•PROPRÆTORICIVM•XXIX (A C•ARMINIVS•RECCANELLVS XI)
CAIVS•ARMINIVS•RECCANELLVS•PROPRÆTOR•BRASILIƕOMNIBVS•CIVIBUS•S•P•D

By this edictum, and using my Imperium (given to me by Senatus and
Populus Romanum), I decide:

Because the new citizens have been demonstrating many interests on
the brazilian provincial jobs, I revoke the antiquity necessary for
the functions of LEGATVS INTERNIS REBVS, LEGATVS EXTERNIS REBVS and
PROCURATOR RETIS, as prescripted by EDICTVM·PROPRÆTORICIVM·XXIII (A
C·ARMINIVS·RECCANELLVS V).

In this way, any brazilian citizen, independently of antiquity, can
be nomeated to those functions.

Sorry my real very bad english!

DATVM•SVB•MANV•MEA•A•D•V•ID•IVNIAS•MMDCCLIX•A•V•C
GAIO•FABIO•BUTEONE•MODIANO•POMPEIA•MINUCIA-TIBERIA•STRABONE•CONSULIBUS

C•ARMINIVS•RECCANELLVS
PROPRAETOR•PROVINCIAE•BRASILIAE
QUAESTOR•NOVAE•ROMAE
SCRIBA
"Quousque tandem, Lula, abutere patientia nostra?"





__________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44321 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
CASSI PISO !

Think twice. And take from NR the best part. Sometime, here, the things are moving on very fast and we can take wrong decisions. To resign is one. Belive me, it's very easy to rennounce. Is hard to resist and keep walking. With calm, and step by step. As the ancient soldiers.
Your ID is legio X Equitata. What legio ? What Equitata ? Where is the honour ? You take the decision to decimate yourself ??? Fine ! Who are the winners in this case ?

Romane, stay in line as a member. That is the power of an organization. If you can't understand is your fault. Is your decision, too. But in this case try to change your ID. Is not compatible, not with NR, but with your moral, personal values and honour.
You are one of us. Where you want to go ?

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS


kari piessa <legio_x_equitata@...> wrote:
GAIVS CASSIVS PISO OMNIBVS S.P.D

Today I left in Censors office a request of my citizenship in Nova Roma.
If the things heated yesterday, I from my part apology.
I can't continue in an association which goes against my moral, personal values and my honour.
I hope that all good romans understand my decision, based in my conscience.
I wish everything good to all good romans.

Valete
Gaius Cassius Piso
Provincia Hispaniae

__________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]








NOVA ROMANI !
Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support page to your websites.
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm

"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44322 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
SALVE !

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, kari piessa <legio_x_equitata@...>
wrote:
> GAIVS CASSIVS PISO OMNIBVS S.P.D
>Today I left in Censors office a request of my citizenship in Nova
Roma.If the things heated yesterday, I from my part apology.I can't
continue in an association which goes against my moral, personal
values and my honour.I hope that all good romans understand my
decision, based in my conscience.I wish everything good to all good
romans.>>>

CASSI PISO !

Think twice. And take from NR the best part. Sometime, here, the
things are moving on very fast and we can take wrong decisions. To
resign is one. Belive me, it's very easy to rennounce. Is hard to
resist and keep walking. With calm, and step by step. As the ancient
soldiers.
Your ID is legio X Equitata. What legio ? What Equitata ? Where is
the honour ? You take the decision to decimate yourself ??? Fine !
Who are the winners in this case ?

Romane, stay in line as a member. That is the power of an
organization. If you can't understand is your fault. Is your
decision, too. But in this case try to change your ID. Is not
compatible, not with NR, but with your moral, personal values and
honour.
You are one of us. Where you want to go ?

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44323 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Salvete omnes,

I also should point out that we should remember that there is a hell
of a lot of great people and good values found here. Aside from just
Rome there are people here who can teach the classics, another who
can tell you all about nuclear submarines theough to script writers
and an astrophysicist. The politics of many of our citizens range
from very liberal to very conservative in national and world views.

You cannot expect when we have had up to 2500 people in NR that
99.9% are going to be perfect. There will always be the few
controversial figures that will slip through the nets unfortunately.
Portugal and Canada are considered great contries on the own rite
but are we free from theives, murderers, trouble makers, political
extremists and even nazis or fascists? I sure don't think so. Even
our smaller towns of 2500 people sure have there characters. One
famous holocaust denier from Eckville, Alberta (1500+ -) made world
headlines 20 years ago when he taught his philosophy in his school
classroom and in Wainright (3000 + -) they had a cross burning
ceremony at that time.

So in comparisson to the number of people NR has not done badly and
will be more vigilant in future. I see no reason to pack up and
leave. Stay, if necessary show our multicultural republic and Roman
virtues to these kind of people. They will learn and change their
ways perhaps. Panicking and leaving will on give them a sense a
victory knowing the power they have to stir up trouble and
discontent, breaking up liberal organization and ideals everywhere.

Regards,

QSP



-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Iulius Sabinus"
<iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
>
> SALVE !
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, kari piessa <legio_x_equitata@>
> wrote:
> > GAIVS CASSIVS PISO OMNIBVS S.P.D
> >Today I left in Censors office a request of my citizenship in
Nova
> Roma.If the things heated yesterday, I from my part apology.I
can't
> continue in an association which goes against my moral, personal
> values and my honour.I hope that all good romans understand my
> decision, based in my conscience.I wish everything good to all
good
> romans.>>>
>
> CASSI PISO !
>
> Think twice. And take from NR the best part. Sometime, here, the
> things are moving on very fast and we can take wrong decisions. To
> resign is one. Belive me, it's very easy to rennounce. Is hard to
> resist and keep walking. With calm, and step by step. As the
ancient
> soldiers.
> Your ID is legio X Equitata. What legio ? What Equitata ? Where is
> the honour ? You take the decision to decimate yourself ??? Fine !
> Who are the winners in this case ?
>
> Romane, stay in line as a member. That is the power of an
> organization. If you can't understand is your fault. Is your
> decision, too. But in this case try to change your ID. Is not
> compatible, not with NR, but with your moral, personal values and
> honour.
> You are one of us. Where you want to go ?
>
> VALE BENE,
> IVL SABINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44324 From: Tita Artoria Marcella Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Regarding Appius Claudius Priscus
Salve Pompeia et salvete omnes,

>This has been very unsettling to say the least, the entire matter. I
>will be sorry if you go, but I do not know what manner of vow or
>commitment you feel you have made to your patron deities.

My vow was not to my patron deities and, if it had been, I would have resigned my citizenship by now. Your point about the trial being aborted is an excellent one and removes all sense of shame, for which I thank you. I vowed on my honor that if ten Nova Roma citizens of good repute judged ACP to be innocent of his alleged crimes, I would leave. That never happened.

My commitment to the gods, especially to my patron gods, is very strong. That commitment, and my hope to continue to work toward realizing Nova Roma's goals, are why I am staying a citizen. There is much work to be done, both now and in the years to come.

Besides, where else can I hope to learn classical Latin by long-term exposure?

Vale et valete,
Artoria


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44325 From: Jim Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Salve
I realize I was late sending in my taxes.... and my name was dropped
from the list of citizens... how do I go about getting it restored.
Vale,
Gaius Pompeius Marcellus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44326 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-06-10
Subject: Re: Salve
Salve Gai Pompei,

Write to the censors at censores@... (censores AT novaroma DOT
org) to reinstate your citizenship. Taxes can be paid later. First you
need to get reinstated.

Vale,

-- Marinue

Jim wrote:

> I realize I was late sending in my taxes.... and my name was dropped
> from the list of citizens... how do I go about getting it restored.
> Vale,
> Gaius Pompeius Marcellus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44327 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
SALVE SVETONI PAVLINE!
I see your poin of view and understand it perfectly. I'm just one man. I can´t change the world and therefore I also can´t change Nova Roma. I know that there are great people in NR. My suggestion is: in the future try to alterate the way you admit new citizens. For example, make questions about the candidates personal convictions and their personal values as nova-romans, in order to garantee that their contribution will honour NR.

Vale optime!
Gaius Cassius Piso

"Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> escreveu:
Salvete omnes,

I also should point out that we should remember that there is a hell
of a lot of great people and good values found here. Aside from just
Rome there are people here who can teach the classics, another who
can tell you all about nuclear submarines theough to script writers
and an astrophysicist. The politics of many of our citizens range
from very liberal to very conservative in national and world views.

You cannot expect when we have had up to 2500 people in NR that
99.9% are going to be perfect. There will always be the few
controversial figures that will slip through the nets unfortunately.
Portugal and Canada are considered great contries on the own rite
but are we free from theives, murderers, trouble makers, political
extremists and even nazis or fascists? I sure don't think so. Even
our smaller towns of 2500 people sure have there characters. One
famous holocaust denier from Eckville, Alberta (1500+ -) made world
headlines 20 years ago when he taught his philosophy in his school
classroom and in Wainright (3000 + -) they had a cross burning
ceremony at that time.

So in comparisson to the number of people NR has not done badly and
will be more vigilant in future. I see no reason to pack up and
leave. Stay, if necessary show our multicultural republic and Roman
virtues to these kind of people. They will learn and change their
ways perhaps. Panicking and leaving will on give them a sense a
victory knowing the power they have to stir up trouble and
discontent, breaking up liberal organization and ideals everywhere.

Regards,

QSP

-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Iulius Sabinus"
<iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
>
> SALVE !
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, kari piessa <legio_x_equitata@>
> wrote:
> > GAIVS CASSIVS PISO OMNIBVS S.P.D
> >Today I left in Censors office a request of my citizenship in
Nova
> Roma.If the things heated yesterday, I from my part apology.I
can't
> continue in an association which goes against my moral, personal
> values and my honour.I hope that all good romans understand my
> decision, based in my conscience.I wish everything good to all
good
> romans.>>>
>
> CASSI PISO !
>
> Think twice. And take from NR the best part. Sometime, here, the
> things are moving on very fast and we can take wrong decisions. To
> resign is one. Belive me, it's very easy to rennounce. Is hard to
> resist and keep walking. With calm, and step by step. As the
ancient
> soldiers.
> Your ID is legio X Equitata. What legio ? What Equitata ? Where is
> the honour ? You take the decision to decimate yourself ??? Fine !
> Who are the winners in this case ?
>
> Romane, stay in line as a member. That is the power of an
> organization. If you can't understand is your fault. Is your
> decision, too. But in this case try to change your ID. Is not
> compatible, not with NR, but with your moral, personal values and
> honour.
> You are one of us. Where you want to go ?
>
> VALE BENE,
> IVL SABINVS
>





__________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44328 From: decimus_tullius_atta Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Observations From a New Citizen
Salvete Omnes,
I was only recently granted citizenship in Nova Roma and have been
following the recent debate with interest. Please accept these
opinions as those of someone new to NR, but old to the rough and
tumble of life. First, to those who are disheartened by the
conflict generated by the actions against Appius Claudius Priscus,
buck up! Vigorous debate is the sign of a healthy REPUBLIC, and it
always appears messy.

Remember, we are not gods, and we will not achieve perfect justice
in human institutions. Our consuls, senators and other leaders will
make mistakes. I do not expect to agree with all of their actions
or decisions. If I find myself too often in disagreement, I will
seek out new leaders. That is the democratic way.

To those who fear that the actions against A.C.P. are the fist step
down the slippery slope to tyranny, I would say the line has been
crossed when those who initiate such actions turn on their critics
and the defenders of A.C.P. and single them out for similar
treatment. I see no sign of such suppression of debate, but it is
what I would look for.

On the question of the Priorities of Nova Roma, I am very much of
the view that the Religio Romana must be first, because our
relations with the gods are the foundation on which all else must be
built. Did not the Romans themselves believe this to be the case?
It was my own turning away from revealed religion to the gods of my
Italian ancestors that led me to NR. I will admit that initially I
was sceptical of the micronational ambitions articulated by NR.
However, I asked myself a simple question. "Would the gods approve
of this endeavor?" Believing the answer to be yes, I put aside my
doubts and chose to join the effort. The decision has already
yielded fruit in my taking up Latin again after a failed attempt in
graduate school many years ago. Of course, my motivation now is far
greater than when my interest was purely academic.

I look forward to getting to know all of you in the coming months
and years.

Valete,

D. Tullius Atta
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44329 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
SALVE IVLI SABINE!

You are questioning my ID as legio-x-equitata.
Let me tell you a story. I was raised to lead with horses, cavalry, in Finland.
A father of my grandfather was a soldier, my grandfather was a soldier, my father was a soldier. When I was young, I with my friends formed an roman legion which we called legio-x-equitata. It was a role playing game, but we took it very serious. We leaded with horses as a roman cavalry. So, don´t question me about the legionary things, because I started the practice 30 years ago!
Where were you 30 years ago? Training as a roman soldier of cavalry?
Are you able to confront me as a roman solder in the combate? One day, did you hold a Gladius in your hand? Or Scutum? One day did you ride on horses back?
Let the military issues to the militaries. And let me in peace, ok? My friends of chilhood have more practice about the roman military issues than you could ever have.

Vale bene
Gaius Cassius Piso

iulius sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> escreveu:
CASSI PISO !

Think twice. And take from NR the best part. Sometime, here, the things are moving on very fast and we can take wrong decisions. To resign is one. Belive me, it's very easy to rennounce. Is hard to resist and keep walking. With calm, and step by step. As the ancient soldiers.
Your ID is legio X Equitata. What legio ? What Equitata ? Where is the honour ? You take the decision to decimate yourself ??? Fine ! Who are the winners in this case ?

Romane, stay in line as a member. That is the power of an organization. If you can't understand is your fault. Is your decision, too. But in this case try to change your ID. Is not compatible, not with NR, but with your moral, personal values and honour.
You are one of us. Where you want to go ?

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS


kari piessa <legio_x_equitata@...> wrote:
GAIVS CASSIVS PISO OMNIBVS S.P.D

Today I left in Censors office a request of my citizenship in Nova Roma.
If the things heated yesterday, I from my part apology.
I can't continue in an association which goes against my moral, personal values and my honour.
I hope that all good romans understand my decision, based in my conscience.
I wish everything good to all good romans.

Valete
Gaius Cassius Piso
Provincia Hispaniae

__________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

NOVA ROMANI !
Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support page to your websites.
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm

"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





__________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44330 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
SALVE CASSI PISO !

Ok. I will let you in peace. My intentions were friendly ones.
But about military issues, I must recognize I don't have any experience.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

kari piessa <legio_x_equitata@...> wrote:
SALVE IVLI SABINE!

You are questioning my ID as legio-x-equitata.
Let me tell you a story. I was raised to lead with horses, cavalry, in Finland.
A father of my grandfather was a soldier, my grandfather was a soldier, my father was a soldier. When I was young, I with my friends formed an roman legion which we called legio-x-equitata. It was a role playing game, but we took it very serious. We leaded with horses as a roman cavalry. So, don´t question me about the legionary things, because I started the practice 30 years ago!
Where were you 30 years ago? Training as a roman soldier of cavalry?
Are you able to confront me as a roman solder in the combate? One day, did you hold a Gladius in your hand? Or Scutum? One day did you ride on horses back?
Let the military issues to the militaries. And let me in peace, ok? My friends of chilhood have more practice about the roman military issues than you could ever have.

Vale bene
Gaius Cassius Piso











NOVA ROMANI !
Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support page to your websites.
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm

"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44331 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: a.d. III Id. Iun.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem III Idus Iunius; haec dies nefastus est.

"Now you complain, Phrygian Tithonus, abandoned by your bride,
And the vigilant Morning Star leaves the Eastern waters.
Good mothers (since the Matralia is your festival),
Go, offer the Theban goddess the golden cakes she's owed.
Near the bridges and mighty Circus is a famous square,
One that takes its name from the statue of an ox:
There, on this day, they say, Servius with his own
Royal hands, consecrated a temple to Mother Matruta.
Bacchus, whose hair is twined with clustered grapes,
If the goddess' house is also yours, guide the poet's work,
Regarding who the goddess is, and why she excludes
(Since she does) female servants from the threshold
Of her temple, and why she calls for toasted cakes.
Semele was burnt by Jove's compliance: Ino
Received you as a baby, and nursed you with utmost care.
Juno swelled with rage, that Ino should raise a child
Snatched from Jove's lover: but it was her sister's son.
So Athamas was haunted by the Furies, and false visions,
And little Learchus died by his father's hand.
His grieving mother committed his shade to the tomb.
And paid the honours due to the sad pyre.
Then tearing her hair in sorrow, she leapt up
And snatched you from your cradle, Melicertes.
There's a narrow headland between two seas,
A single space attacked by twofold waves:
There Ino came, clutching her son in her frenzied grasp,
And threw herself, with him, from a high cliff into the sea.
Panope and her hundred sisters received them unharmed,
And gliding smoothly carried them through their realm.
They reached the mouth of densely eddying Tiber,
Before they became Leucothea and Palaemon.
There was a grove: known either as Semele's or Stimula's:
Inhabited, they say, by Italian Maenads.
Ino, asking them their nation, learned they were Arcadians,
And that Evander was the king of the place.
Hiding her divinity, Saturn's daughter cleverly
Incited the Latian Bacchae with deceiving words:
`O too-easy-natured ones, caught by every feeling!
This stranger comes, but not as a friend, to our gathering.
She's treacherous, and would learn our sacred rites:
But she has a child on whom we can wreak punishment.'
She'd scarcely ended when the Thyiads, hair streaming
Over their necks, filled the air with their howling,
Laid hands on Ino, and tried to snatch the boy.
She invoked gods with names as yet unknown to her:
`Gods, and men, of this land, help a wretched mother!'
Her cry carried to the neighbouring Aventine.
Oetaean Hercules having driven the Iberian cattle
To the riverbank, heard and hurried towards the voice.
As he arrived, the women who'd been ready for violence,
Shamefully turned their backs in cowardly flight.
`What are you doing here,' said Hercules (recognising her),
`Sister of Bacchus' mother? Does Juno persecute you too?'
She told him part of her tale, suppressing the rest because of her on:
Ashamed to have been goaded to crime by the Furies.
Rumour, so swift, flew on beating wings,
And your name was on many a lip, Ino.
It's said you entered loyal Carmentis' home
As a guest, and assuaged your great hunger:
They say the Tegean priestess quickly made cakes
With her own hands, and baked them on the hearth.
Now cakes delight the goddess at the Matralia:
Country ways pleased her more than art's attentions.
`Now, O prophetess,' she said, `reveal my future fate,
As far as is right. Add this, I beg, to your hospitality.'
A pause ensued. Then the prophetess assumed divine powers,
And her whole breast filled with the presence of the god:
You'd hardly have known her then, so much taller
And holier she'd become than a moment before.
`I sing good news, Ino,' she said, `your trials are over,
Be a blessing to your people for evermore.
You'll be a sea goddess, and your son will inhabit ocean.
Take different names now, among your own waves:
Greeks will call you Leucothea, our people Matuta:
Your son will have complete command of harbours,
We'll call him Portunus, Palaemon in his own tongue.
Go, and both be friends, I beg you, of our country!'
Ino nodded, and gave her promise. Their trials were over,
They changed their names: he's a god and she's a goddess.
You ask why she forbids the approach of female servants?
She hates them: by her leave I'll sing the reason for her hate.
Daughter of Cadmus, one of your maids
Was often embraced by your husband.
Faithless Athamas secretly enjoyed her: he learned
From her that you gave the farmers parched seed.
You yourself denied it, but rumour confirmed it.
That's why you hate the service of a maid.
But let no loving mother pray to her, for her child:
She herself proved an unfortunate parent.
Better command her to help another's child:
She was more use to Bacchus than her own.
They say she asked you, Rutilius, `Where are you rushing?
As consul you'll fall to the Marsian enemy on my day.'
Her words were fulfilled, the Tolenus
Flowed purple, its waters mixed with blood.
The following year, Didius, killed on the same
Day, doubled the enemy's strength.
Fortuna, the same day is yours, your temple
Founded by the same king, in the same place.
And whose is that statue hidden under draped robes?
It's Servius, that's for sure, but different reasons
Are given for the drapes, and I'm in doubt.
When the goddess fearfully confessed to a secret love,
Ashamed, since she's immortal, to mate with a man
(For she burned, seized with intense passion for the king,
And he was the only man she wasn't blind to),
She used to enter his palace at night by a little window:
So that the gate bears the name Fenestella.
She's still ashamed, and hides the beloved features
Under cloth: the king's face being covered by a robe.
Or is it rather that, after his murder, the people
Were bewildered by their gentle leader's death,
Their grief swelling, endlessly, at the sight
Of the statue, until they hid him under robes?
I must sing at greater length of a third reason,
Though I'll still keep my team on a tight rein.
Having secured her marriage by crime, Tullia
Used to incite her husband with words like these:
`What use if we're equally matched, you by my sister's
Murder, I by your brother's, in leading a virtuous life?
Better that my husband and your wife had lived,
Than that we shrink from greater achievement.
I offer my father's life and realm as my dower:
If you're a man, go take the dower I speak of.
Crime is the mark of kingship. Kill your wife's father,
Seize the kingdom, dip our hands in my father's blood.'
Urged on be such words, though a private citizen
He usurped the high throne: the people, stunned, took up arms.
With blood and slaughter the weak old man was defeated:
Tarquin the Proud snatched his father-in-law's sceptre.
Servius himself fell bleeding to the hard earth,
At the foot of the Esquiline, site of his palace.
His daughter, driving to her father's home,
Rode through the streets, erect and haughty.
When her driver saw the king's body, he halted
In tears. She reproved him in these terms:
`Go on, or do you seek the bitter fruits of virtue?
Drive the unwilling wheels, I say, over his face.'
A certain proof of this is Evil Street, named
After her, while eternal infamy marks the deed.
Yet she still dared to visit her father's temple,
His monument: what I tell is strange but true.
There was a statue enthroned, an image of Servius:
They say it put a hand to its eyes,
And a voice was heard: `Hide my face,
Lest it view my own wicked daughter.'
It was veiled by cloth, Fortune refused to let the robe
Be removed, and she herself spoke from her temple:
`The day when Servius' face is next revealed,
Will be a day when shame is cast aside.'
Women, beware of touching the forbidden cloth,
(It's sufficient to utter prayers in solemn tones)
And let him who was the City's seventh king
Keep his head covered, forever, by this veil.
The temple once burned: but the fire spared
The statue: Mulciber himself preserved his son.
For Servius' father was Vulcan, and the lovely
Ocresia of Corniculum his mother.
Once, performing sacred rites with her in the due manner,
Tanaquil ordered her to pour wine on the garlanded hearth:
There was, or seemed to be, the form of a male organ
In the ashes: the shape was really there in fact.
The captive girl sat on the hearth, as commanded:
She conceived Servius, born of divine seed.
His father showed his paternity by touching the child's
Head with fire, and a cap of flames glowed on his hair.
And Livia, this day dedicated a magnificent shrine to you,
Concordia, that she offered to her dear husband.
Learn this, you age to come: where Livia's Colonnade
Now stands, there was once a vast palace.
A site that was like a city: it occupied a space
Larger than that of many a walled town.
It was levelled to the soil, not because of its owner's treason,
But because its excess was considered harmful.
Caesar countenanced the demolition of such a mass,
Destroying its great wealth to which he was heir.
That's the way to censure vice, and set an example,
When the adviser himself does as he advises." - Ovid, Fasti VI

"To Eos, Fumigation from Manna. Hear me, O Goddess, whose emerging ray
leads on the broad refulgence of the day; blushing Eos, whose
celestial light beams on the world with reddening splendours bright.
Messenger of Titan, whom with constant round thy orient beams recall
from night profound: labour of every kind to lead it thine, of mortal
life the minister divine. Mankind in thee eternally delight, and none
presumes to shun thy beauteous sight. Soon as they splendours break
the bands of rest, and eyes unclose, with pleasing sleep oppressed;
men, reptiles, birds, and beasts, with general voice, and all the
nations of the deep rejoice; for all the culture of our life is thine.
Come, blessed power, and to these rites incline: thy holy light
increase, and unconfined diffuse its radiance on the mystics' mind." -
Orphic Hymn 78 to Eos

Today is the celebration of the Matralia, dedicated to Mater
Matuta,the Roman goddess of the dawn, newborn babes, but also of the
sea and harbors. This last connection is an interesting one: it
occurred because Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus, after the conquest of
Sardinia in 174 BC, placed a large map in the temple of Matuta
displaying the course of the Sardinian campaign. Her temple was
situated on the Forum Boarium (the cattle market). This festival was
only open to women who were still in their first marriage. She was
associated with Aurora and identified with the Greek Eos.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, the Orphic Poet, Encyclopedia Mythica
(http://www.pantheon.org/articles/m/matuta.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44332 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Gaius Cassius Piso
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus propr. quaest.: T. Julio Sabino, C. Cassio Pisoni: sal.:

Dear Sabinus, I see your best intentions to convince that C. Cassius to stay, as well as that of many others who are trying to convince him. C. Cassius however continues to sound that he will leave us - but he is still here.

Gai Cassi! Please leave us, if you really don't want to be a citizen of the only one existing Roman republic in the world, or calm down and stay with us: we need everyone.

Curate ut valeatis!

Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
PROPRAETOR PANNONIAE
QVAESTOR
accensus & scriba


iulius sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> ha scritto:
SALVE CASSI PISO !

Ok. I will let you in peace. My intentions were friendly ones.
But about military issues, I must recognize I don't have any experience.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

kari piessa <legio_x_equitata@...> wrote:
SALVE IVLI SABINE!

You are questioning my ID as legio-x-equitata.
Let me tell you a story. I was raised to lead with horses, cavalry, in Finland.
A father of my grandfather was a soldier, my grandfather was a soldier, my father was a soldier. When I was young, I with my friends formed an roman legion which we called legio-x-equitata. It was a role playing game, but we took it very serious. We leaded with horses as a roman cavalry. So, don´t question me about the legionary things, because I started the practice 30 years ago!
Where were you 30 years ago? Training as a roman soldier of cavalry?
Are you able to confront me as a roman solder in the combate? One day, did you hold a Gladius in your hand? Or Scutum? One day did you ride on horses back?
Let the military issues to the militaries. And let me in peace, ok? My friends of chilhood have more practice about the roman military issues than you could ever have.

Vale bene
Gaius Cassius Piso

NOVA ROMANI !
Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support page to your websites.
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm

"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale!
http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44333 From: Brutus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Observations From a New Citizen
Salve Tulli Atta!

Welcome to Nova Roma. After all the furore I am greatly heartened to read your post. The priorities you mention are those which motivate so many of us.

Vale!

Caius Moravius Brutus

decimus_tullius_atta <bowcure@...> wrote:
Salvete Omnes,
I was only recently granted citizenship in Nova Roma and have been
following the recent debate with interest. Please accept these
opinions as those of someone new to NR, but old to the rough and
tumble of life. First, to those who are disheartened by the
conflict generated by the actions against Appius Claudius Priscus,
buck up! Vigorous debate is the sign of a healthy REPUBLIC, and it
always appears messy.

Remember, we are not gods, and we will not achieve perfect justice
in human institutions. Our consuls, senators and other leaders will
make mistakes. I do not expect to agree with all of their actions
or decisions. If I find myself too often in disagreement, I will
seek out new leaders. That is the democratic way.

To those who fear that the actions against A.C.P. are the fist step
down the slippery slope to tyranny, I would say the line has been
crossed when those who initiate such actions turn on their critics
and the defenders of A.C.P. and single them out for similar
treatment. I see no sign of such suppression of debate, but it is
what I would look for.

On the question of the Priorities of Nova Roma, I am very much of
the view that the Religio Romana must be first, because our
relations with the gods are the foundation on which all else must be
built. Did not the Romans themselves believe this to be the case?
It was my own turning away from revealed religion to the gods of my
Italian ancestors that led me to NR. I will admit that initially I
was sceptical of the micronational ambitions articulated by NR.
However, I asked myself a simple question. "Would the gods approve
of this endeavor?" Believing the answer to be yes, I put aside my
doubts and chose to join the effort. The decision has already
yielded fruit in my taking up Latin again after a failed attempt in
graduate school many years ago. Of course, my motivation now is far
greater than when my interest was purely academic.

I look forward to getting to know all of you in the coming months
and years.

Valete,

D. Tullius Atta






"It's all right,lads: the chickens say it's going to be all right..."

The Emperor Claudius
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44334 From: Brutus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE - Regarding Appius Claudius Priscus
Salve Artoria Marcella!

I am delighted to see that you have decided to stay with us. Indeed I have been heartened that so many of our citizens have been shocked by the unsettling presence of this person among us.

Vale!

Caius Moravius Brutus

Tita Artoria Marcella <icehunter@...> wrote:
Salve Pompeia et salvete omnes,

>This has been very unsettling to say the least, the entire matter. I
>will be sorry if you go, but I do not know what manner of vow or
>commitment you feel you have made to your patron deities.

My vow was not to my patron deities and, if it had been, I would have resigned my citizenship by now. Your point about the trial being aborted is an excellent one and removes all sense of shame, for which I thank you. I vowed on my honor that if ten Nova Roma citizens of good repute judged ACP to be innocent of his alleged crimes, I would leave. That never happened.

My commitment to the gods, especially to my patron gods, is very strong. That commitment, and my hope to continue to work toward realizing Nova Roma's goals, are why I am staying a citizen. There is much work to be done, both now and in the years to come.

Besides, where else can I hope to learn classical Latin by long-term exposure?

Vale et valete,
Artoria

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






"It's all right,lads: the chickens say it's going to be all right..."

The Emperor Claudius
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44335 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Observations From a New Citizen
C. Equitius Cato D. Tullio Attae sal.

Salve Tullius Atta!

Welcome to the Republic. Sound words of advice, indeed.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44336 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Observations From a New Citizen
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus quaestor: D. Tullio Attae: salutem dicit:

Salve, Decime Tulli Atta! You are very welcome in the Republic! Firstly, let me congratulate on your beautiful and rare cognomen: it's very hard to choose a name from the many wonderful Roman names. Your choice is fine!

Just for your information, I'm Gnaeus Lentulus, Quaestor of Praetor T. Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus, our major Praetor, and as such, moderator of this Forum. Furthermore, Propraetor of Pannonia Provincia and its provincial priest as well as assistant of some magistrates, including a Consul, a Censor, an Aedilis and our Latin Interpreter. Two years ago, I was nothing in Nova Roma but a citizen: this all was said only because to encourage you as a new citizen: assume duties, offices, tasks, be enthusiast, expend time on NR, and you will find yourself in the midst of a real Roman life we all stand for.

>>> First, to those who are disheartened by the
conflict generated by the actions against Appius Claudius Priscus,
buck up! Vigorous debate is the sign of a healthy REPUBLIC, and it
always appears messy. <<<

Thank you for these words: really, the debute is the sign our Republic is still free, healthy and flourishing. We have to keep debuting but also keep in mind that we are friends, we need each other, the idea of Rome needs us all, so we have to esteem and honour each other even in the most fervent debute.

>>> Remember, we are not gods, and we will not achieve perfect justice
in human institutions. Our consuls, senators and other leaders will
make mistakes. I do not expect to agree with all of their actions
or decisions. If I find myself too often in disagreement, I will
seek out new leaders. That is the democratic way. <<<

This is a composed, sober and wise opinion. The elections are coming soon, everyone discontent can run for offices or vote for others. The democracy is ever so much flourishing in Nova Roma, perhaps too flourishing :-)

<<< On the question of the Priorities of Nova Roma, I am very much of
the view that the Religio Romana must be first, because our
relations with the gods are the foundation on which all else must be
built. >>>>

You are right, Decime Tulli, ideas are primary then the other installations can come from. First the Religio and the Roman Way of Thinking and Living has to be present in our modern world, then a real life community will be able to be established and Rome will be reborn.

>>> Did not the Romans themselves believe this to be the case?
It was my own turning away from revealed religion to the gods of my
Italian ancestors that led me to NR. <<<

But that revealed religion has its own place in the New Rome. I myself am a Harmonist, a kind of syncretist who beleive in The Supreme Being - and practice the rites of the politheist Roman religion. I beleive that these two are far reconciliable.

>>> I will admit that initially I
was sceptical of the micronational ambitions articulated by NR. <<<

I think that the probation of your commitment is not the micronational ambitions of NR - but the macronational ones. It's hard to beleive that someday NR will be a real macronational entity - but I personally beleive it, will struggle for it: this is my life, and was ever even before I would know this association.

>>> However, I asked myself a simple question. "Would the gods approve
of this endeavor?" Believing the answer to be yes, I put aside my
doubts and chose to join the effort. <<<

If the gods of our ancestors do exist - it's surely thier intention.

>>> The decision has already
yielded fruit in my taking up Latin again after a failed attempt in
graduate school many years ago. >>>

So, dear Decimus Tullius, I am ever so much glad! I am a Latinist, a classicist and ready to help you in your learning process! Latin is to be the mother tongue of the New Rome, as well as that was of the Old one. Vivant linguam Latinam discentes!

>>> Of course, my motivation now is far
greater than when my interest was purely academic. <<<

Hard work, enthusiasm, persistence! Have you ever heard of the NR Sodalitas Latinitatis? This is our Latin Society, of which I am the First Decurio, one of its vice-presidents. I warmly invite you to join in us, where we can help your learning process and you can see our best Latin speaker citizens: it will be an encouraging example!

To join in:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Latinitas/

>>> I look forward to getting to know all of you in the coming months
and years. <<<

I am glad to get to know you, and I am ready to help you in anything, especially in learning Latin!

Cura, ut valeas quam optime!




Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
Q U A E S T O R
-------------------------------
Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
Accensus Consulis C. Fabii Buteonis
Scriba Censoris Cn. Equitii Marini
Scriba Aedilis Curulis T. Iulii Sabini
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae Tulliae Scholasticae
-------------------------------
Decurio I. Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Dominus Factionis Russatae
Latinista, Classicus Philologus

Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale!
http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44337 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Observations From a New Citizen
Salve Tulli Atta,

A hearty welcome to Nova Roma and I hope you will always enjoy it here.
Thanks for your wise observations that we should all note!

Regards,

QSP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44338 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Multis de rebus
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

I've been busy over the last week or so, which is why you've heard almost nothing from me about the main events of the week. I'm glad that the matter appears largely to have been resolved, and I hope you'll permit me to share some thoughts about what has been said without wishing to re-open major discussion.

The first point to note is the use of the so-called senatus consultum ultimum (it was probably not called this in ancient times). Ti. Galerius shared with us a useful explanation of the history of this device. Another good discussion can be found in an appendix to Andrew Lintott's excellent little book "The Constitution of the Roman Republic", which I once again recommend to anyone who wants to understand how to live in a Roman republic.

In our lex constitutiva the senatus consultum ultimum is a very different beast from the ancient equivalent. In the old republic it was not at all clear what the legal effect of the senatus consultum ultimum was: according to some it suspended the normal operation of law, and according to others it had no real legal effect at all. (As has been said, C. Caesar held the latter view. Someone suggested in this forum that he did so because he was worried about the senatus consultum ultimum being used against him. This is utter rubbish: he had already made his views on the subject clear many years before there was even the slightest danger of it being used against him personally.) What was clear is that it was couched in very broad terms: it urged the consules to do whatever they considered necessary to see that the republic should come to no harm. Once the senate had given this piece of advice, it could not complain about anything the consules might choose to do under its
authority. In our republic, on the other hand, the lex constitutiva has generally been interpreted as allowing the senate to use the senatus consultum ultimum to empower the consules to do some very specific task which would normally be illegal or unconstitutional.

No doubt the drafters of the lex constitutiva thought this would be a beneficial limitation on a potentially far-reaching power, but once again we find on careful inspection that they have departed from ancient practice without really understanding what they were doing. The effect is simply to transfer the power from the consules to the senate. It allows the senate to decide what it thinks should be done and then give the consules the power to do it, but without giving the consules any discretion to meet the emergency in any way they may think more appropriate.

The word "emergency" there highlights another difference. The senatus consultum ultimum of the ancient republic was used on in emergencies. It is important to understand what an emergency is. An emergency does not occur merely when there is a serious threat to the community. Global warming, for example, is a serious threat to human communities, but you don't see governments declaring national states of emergency and adopting emergency powers to deal with it. The threat must be not only serious but immediate and pressing. It must be one which requires a response so urgently that there is no time to go through the normal channels to deal with it. That is the nature of an emergency. The senatus consultum ultimum, as used in Nova Roma, is obviously totally inappropriate for such situations. Our senate is a cumbersome body, and it is quite remarkable if it can reach decision in a week - the chance of it reaching a decision in a day or two is virtually nil. This is all the more
true if, rather than simply instructing the consules to do whatever they think necessary to see that the republic should come to no harm, it is going to work out very specifically what the proper solution is and authorize the consules to do that and that alone. If there were any genuine emergency, the senatus consultum ultimum would probably come too late to help.

It is instructive to compare the institution of the dictatura. Here again the drafters of the lex constitutiva have made a muddle. The senatus consultum ultimum and the dictatura never co-existed. The former was invented to fill the gap left when the latter fell into disuse. The dictaturae of Sulla and Caesar were not true dictaturae: they were something entirely new, not a response to an emergency at all but rather an institution for restoring stability after an emergency had come and gone. When it comes to responses to emergencies, the enactment of the senatus consultum ultimum and the appointment of a dictator serve the same purpose. Yet our lex constitutiva includes them both, allowing the senate to choose between the two. And with respect to the dictatura, as with the senatus consultum ultimum, the unintended effect of well-meaning but incompetent departure from ancient practice is that power has been transferred from magistrates to the senate. A dictator could be
appointed by a consul, and only by a consul. In our lex constitutiva a dictator can only be appointed by the senate. Thus by the time the senate has finished deliberating the emergency will already be far advanced. If there is time for the senate to discuss a situation then that situation is almost certainly not an emergency; if it is an emergency, then there will almost certainly not be time for the senate to discuss it.

What was the situation here? Clearly there was no emergency. The consules may have been correct in their opinion that Ap. Claudius' actions constituted a threat to the republic, but it was not a threat which required a response within a matter or hours or even days. Indeed it seems that the consules are now of the opinion that the threat is no un-urgent that he can be allowed to remain here indefinitely. So quite obviously there was no reason whatsoever for normal processes to be suspended: normal procedures would have been entirely adequate.

Some have commented that this is only an internet community, no one is threatened with execution or loss of livelihood or liberty. Why, they ask, should the leaders of the group not have the power to kick out trouble-makers at their discretion, without fiddling around with lengthy procedures? The point can be reversed, however. It is true that this community is largely based on the internet, and it is true that what happens here is not likely to result in anyone getting killed or imprisoned. What, then, can possibly be so urgent that we cannot afford to spend a few weeks going through the procedures which have been properly laid down by the community? One may argue, of course, that the procedures which have been laid down are too cumbersome and should be changed. But the fact remains that, until they are changed, they are the rules of our community, and the only situation in which we should even contemplate evading those procedures is a situation of such urgency and
importance that it would be positively dangerous to take the time to follow those procedures. Since by the very nature of our community there is no risk of Nova Roma getting bombed, invaded, or anything like that, I find it almost impossible to imagine any situation in which such emergency-type behaviour would be necessary.

If there was no emergency, then what was going on? I can only imagine that it was this: the consules wanted to get rid of this person and found that they could not do so without going through procedures which they did not want to go through. They therefore sought to suspend the normal procedures, not because the situation was so urgent that normal procedures were inadequate but simply because the normal procedures were inconvenient. This shows the very real problem with the emergency powers set out in our lex constitutiva: they are totally inadequate for dealing with a real emergency, but they are very tempting for someone who wants to evade tedious formalities which prevent him doing what he wants to do. This is a particular danger with the dictatura, which effectively gives the senate the power to enact unilateral changes to the lex constitutiva without consulting the populus at all. All it needs to do is to appoint a dictator with a mandate to make the changes it wants
made; the dictator then has the power to make those changes by edict. Any changes made by the dictator which the senate does not like it can then nullify by refusing to ratify them retrospectively. The lex constitutiva could be totally rewritten without the assembly being convened at all. This could never have happened in ancient times: the dictator was not appointed by the senate, had no power to legislate without convening the comitia in the usual way, and was not subject to subsequent ratification by the senate.

The senate, in short, has been given by our lex constitutiva complete control of all emergency powers, while being totally ineffective to respond to emergencies. In the old republic emergency powers were exercised by magistrates: either by the consules under their normal constitutional powers, or by the consules under the authority of a broadly-phrased senatus consultum ultimum which left them freedom of action, or by a dictator appointed by a consul who could consult the senate but was not bound by it. This is clearly the right solution: emergencies require responses by individuals in positions of leadership, not by unwieldy committees.

So, the proposed senatus consultum ultimum was vetoed. I must briefly respond to the argument, put forward by some people, that a proposed senatus consultum ultimum cannot be vetoed because it suspends the constitution, including the tribunes' power of veto. This is quite astonishing wrong. First, the senatus consultum ultimum does not suspend the entire constitution. It simply (according to the lex constitutiva) gives the consules the power to suspend parts of the constitution at their discretion. Secondly, even if the senatus consultum did have the effect of automatically suspending the entire constitution this would obviously not happen until the senatus consultum had actually been passed. A legal enactment cannot have any legal effect until it has been enacted. If the constitution were suspended as soon as the senatus consultum were proposed, then a consul would not even have to get the senate's approval for whatever normally-illegal act he was planning, he would simply
have top convene the senate and *propose* a senatus consultum ultimum, and that would immediately suspend the constitution and allow him to do whatever he wished. That would be totally absurd.

Anyway, the proposal was vetoed. The next attempt was a trial. This looked much more like the proper procedure for dealing with a non-emergency, but it soon became clear that it was still a way of evading normal procedures rather than a serious attempt to use the normal procedures. The court was not a court constituted according to the lex Salicia judiciaria, nor was it a court constituted according to ancient practice. These are the only two legitimate ways to set up a court in Nova Roma. A consul cannot create a court out of thin air and determine its procedures as he wishes. It is a basic Roman constitutional principle that only the populus has the power to deprive a Roman citizen of his citizenship. Thus any court which has banishment as a penalty must be set up by a lex passed by the comitia. A consul cannot set up a court with the power to banish the defendant because a consul has no power to banish anyone, and the court can only derive its powers from the person or
body that sets it up. Then there was the matter of the actual procedures of the court. I gather from what has been said in this forum that an e-mail list was set up: I was not a subscriber to that list, so I don't know what happened there. (I would be most grateful, as a historian and as a student of judicial procedure, to anyone who would be willing to send me a copy of the archives.) But I do know two things: the court was to be presided over by a magistrate who had already publicly declared that he believed the defendant was guilty, and the jury was to be hand-picked by that same magistrate. However impartial the consul and the judices might have been in reality, there is no way that such a court could ever be seen to be fair. It looked from the outset like a court designed to achieve a preconceived outcome.

I'm glad to say that this too came to nothing. The problem that remains is that someone who is alleged to have seriously endangered the republic is still a member of this community and has not been called to account in any way. Several people, including one of the consules, seem keen to lay the blame for this on those people who have opposed unconstitutional behaviour and have insisted that proper procedures be followed. The fault lies in reality with those who tried to use improper procedures in the first place. If only one of the consules had at the outset simply submitted a petitio actionis against this disreputable fellow in the normal way, and prosecuted the case in a normal court, the matter could have been resolved with little fuss, and in all likelihood the fellow in question would have been out on his ear by the end of June. In stead, after two different attempts to circumvent normal procedure, the waters have been so irredeemably muddied that nothing is going to
be done at all. In particular I must say that Cn. Salvius should not be criticised for withdrawing his petitio. He was never obliged to submit it in the first place: he did so as a public service. Having been advised that it would be better for him to withdraw it, he did so. But anyone is free to submit a petitio actionis against anyone else. If you think Astur should not have withdrawn the petitio, then submit your own. Nothing prevents you. And if you don't, then you have no right whatsoever to complain about the fact that it has not been done, because you are as responsible as anyone else.

M. Octavius has commented that "this is a voluntary social club, and people are kicked out of such all the time without elaborate procedures". C. Equitius has already made some pertinent comments, but I think the central point is this: membership of a social club is not the same as Roman citizenship. We say that membership of our community is Roman citizenship, and people are entitled to take us at our word. Roman citizenship is carefully protected and can only be revoked in certain specified ways. That is the nature of Roman citizenship. So as long as we continue to offer people Roman citizenship, and not just membership of a social club, we are making an implicit promise that that status, once acquired, cannot be lost except in the ways in which it has always been possible to lose Roman citizenship: a vote of the comitia or a sentence in a court created by the comitia. If we want to make membership of Nova Roma revocable at the discretion of the consules, then we must
stop calling it Roman citizenship.

On the other hand, I must strongly agree with M. Octavius on another point. He and Cn. Equitius have been criticised for issuing a nota against the person in question. It was said by the consul that this could prejudice the trial. I find it quite astounding that she should criticise the censores for this without also criticising her own colleague, who had spent several days denouncing the defendant in terms far more likely to prejudice the trial than anything in the nota; but that is beside the point, for a person may be right even while being unutterably inconsistent. It is true that, by convention, the censores do not issue notae concerning acts which would normally be within the scope of the criminal law (or, if they do, they normally wait until after the verdict in the trial). It will be remembered that this point arose when a nota was issued against L. Sicinius a couple of years ago. But there are two things to say about it, and by coincidence they were also true of
the nota against Drusus back then. Firstly, this nota was imposed for several reasons, and the arguably criminal act was not the primary reason. The nota was primarily imposed because of the notatus' moral character as reflected in his political views; the fact that he had engaged in unauthorized communications on behalf of the republic was a secondary consideration. This is clear from the wording. So even if they matter of the unauthorized communication were removed from the nota, the nota would still stand as a moral censure. Secondly, the crime in question is very imprecisely defined: it covers anything which might endanger the republic, and also unspecified other matters. It is therefore very likely that seriously immoral behaviour of precisely the kind which could merit a nota could also endanger the republic and thus constitute a crime. If the role of the censores as guardians of public mores is not to be reduced to nothing, we must recognize that they will not
normally be wrong to issue notae for acts which could be prosecuted as crimes of treason.

So, after the senatus consultum, the trial, the nota, we have four edicta from consul C. Buteo. And one of these too has been criticised. In his edictum on fascism he said, "These doctrines being inimical to our Res Publica, any citizen who publicly, either at an official Nova Roma event or electronic forum, associates Nova Roma with such doctrines shall be in violation of the principles in which Nova Roma was founded and at the discretion of the Praetor warrant prosecution under our appropriate Laws." This was said by C. Equitius to violate "both the letter and the spirit of the lex Constitutiva", citing in particular the rights to "complete authority over their own personal and household rites, rituals, and beliefs, pagan or
otherwise" (II.B.1) and to "participate in all public fora and discussions" (II.B.4). I cannot agree with this criticism at all. On the technical point, the right under II.B.1 is quite clearly concerned with religious and metaphysical belief and not with political ideology, and the right under II.B.4 is explicitly stated to be subject to lawful restrictions in the interests of public order. Neither is infringed here. Nor can I see any real objection to the edictum in general. All the consul is saying is that he regards fascist ideology as contra rem publicam and hopes that anyone expressing such views will be prosecuted under our existing law. He is not purporting to create any new criminal offences, and he is not even ordering anyone to prosecute people who commit existing offences. He is saying nothing more controversial than that if someone does something which constitutes a crime he may get prosecuted for it. Admittedly when phrased like that it is hardly worth saying,
but I certainly cannot see that it is unconstitutional to say it.

A final point. One excitable citizen seems to have decided that he cannot bear to remain a member of the same republic as a fascist. This person lives, I believe, in Spain. I understand that fascist parties won several thousand votes in the Spanish general election of 2000. Will this person be leaving Spain too, I wonder? If so, I shall be interested to know which country he finds to live in, which contains not a single fascist. Perhaps he'll find a happy new life in North Korea.

Thank you for your patience. I hope some of this has been of some interest.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44339 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Salvete [welcome]
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

Tres homines saluto: D. Tullium Attam, D. Valerium Thomam Brunum, V. Lucretiam Camillam. Optimas vitas hac in optima re publica eis opto.

[I welcome three people: D. Tullius Atta, D. Valerius Thomas Brunus, and V. Lucretia Camilla. I wish them excellent lives in this excellent republic.]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44340 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: De nominibus Romanis (ERAT: Edictum Censorum in Ap. Claudium Priscu
A. Apollonius Cn. Equitio M. Hortensiae omnibusque sal.

Scripsit C. Equitius:

> Is not his true name Appius Claudius Priscus? <

Responduisti Cn. Equiti:

> Only within Nova Roma. <

Hmm. Probably he is only *known* by this name within Nova Roma, but does that mean that it is not his name anywhere else? Does it stop being his name when he switches off his computer?

I understand the point you're making, amice, but I don't think it's true to say that it is only his name within Nova Roma. I'd say it's his name everywhere, but not his only name.

Scripsisti M. Hortensia:

> as a civis and especially in my status as a minority that he
reviles, Judaeae, I request M. Octavius Germanicus and Gn. Equitius
Marinus in their capacity as Censors of Nova Roma to bestow an
appropriate cognomen on App. Claudius Priscus.
It distresses me to see him bear a noble name & it mentioned in the
forum; let his name reflect his true nature. Let the people mock him. <

I sympathise, amica, but I'm not sure this is the appropriate response. When the old Romans didn't want to do someone the honour of mentioning his name in public they usually just didn't name him at all, rather than giving him extra names. You may notice that in my recent message multis de rebus I adopted that very strategy with respect to the individual in question. :)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44341 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: De rei publicae finibus (ERAT: Edictum consulare - On the Prioritie
A. Apollonius P. Dominio omnibusque sal.

> Does Nova Roma no longer have any greater vision, and no greater
aspirations? Has it really been reduced to a mere social club for the
promotion of a particular variety of paganism? <

The greater aspiration of Nova Roma is so obvious that it need not be stated in any list of priorities: it is simply to be a modern Roman republic. That is the end which all these other projects serve. Even our public religious institutions are means to this end, because their purpose is to secure and maintain the good will of the gods toward the republic, and that of course presupposes that there is a republic for the gods to favour.

I have said it before in this forum, but at the risk of being boring I shall say it again: people too often regard Nova Roma as some kind of project which should have an ultimate goal. But the ultimate purpose of Nova Roma is not to *do* but to *be*: to be a modern Roman republic.

It's obvious why this is not mentioned in the list of priorities: it's for the same reason that when you get up in the morning and think about what you want to achieve during the day you don't begin the list with "be human". It is simply so basic that it need not be said at all.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44342 From: Stefanie Beer Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Betreff: [Nova-Roma] stop that trial, please
Salvete,
perhaps it is enlightening to you that it is forbidden to deny the holocaust
or openly advertize Nazi-beliefs or use Nazi symbols in public in Germany
and as far as I know in Austria and some other nations, too.
In retrospect of the German history of the first half of the 20th century
(macronational) when German people (not all, of course, but the majority)
made the most appaling things happen, or let them happen, because they were
to afraid of taking action against these massive violations of human rights,
or were to indoctrinated to see these actions as evil (remember: no world
wide web, no TV, almost no foreign newspapers - almost only government
controlled radio broadcasts and newspapers) this is an understandable item
within our (yes, macronationally I´m German) laws.
I don´t have a big problem with people holding the Nazi-beliefs, just a BIG
problem with people voicing these opinions in public and associating an
organization I belong to with them.
Firstly, because I think nobody should be allowed to voice beliefs that are
contrary to the Human Rights, secondly because I think that there´s too much
evidence that the holocaust happened (those of you who disagree: don´t try
to discuss evidence with me as I´m in no mood for futile arguments and will
simply delete mails concerning this topic), and last, but not least because
an association of these beliefs to an organization I belong to (be it NR or
a knitting circle, it doesn´t matter) could lead to my dishonourable
discharge as an officer of the German Armed Forces Medical Corps, an action
that wouldn´t please me in the least as I hope you´ll understand.
This is why I support Consul Modianus´ edict on that matter.
Valete,
L.Flavia Lectrix

-------Originalmeldung-------

Von: Claudio Guzzo
Datum: 06/09/06 14:28:06
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] stop that trial, please

"Matt Hucke" hucke@...
wrote:
<And this one is a German by descent, and will not perpetuate,
tolerate, or sanction the evil perpetrated by my people in the
past. Octavius.>
I've never heard that Germans perpetrated any evil or knew and approve it.
Please do not offend all Germans!

"pompeia_minucia_tiberia" pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...
wrote:
<Nobody is going to receive a lethal injection or stand before a
firing squad as a result of a Senatus Consutum Ultimum. They would
just be escorted to the door that says "EXIT"
Pompeia>
If you consider it not serious, please use that door.

QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
<Censors (omissis) Observers on this list would
have to conclude that your action was for your own appeasement and not the
State's.>

"gaiusequitiuscato" mlcinnyc@...
wrote:
<As a citizen of the United States, Claudius Priscus retains the right
to freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution of that country.
Our lex Constitutiva upholds that right. (omissis)>
If you are right (and I think you are) there is an abuse and Priscus is a
victim. And we are too,
because (Gnaeus Iulius Caesar) <when the rights
of one are suspended then the rights of all are at risk, (omissis)and
expulsion of a citizen is a matter that should concern the whole
community in order to prevent abuse by magistrates>
He talks about future abuse, but forget that this trial is an abuse and that
the Nota is an abuse too, because ideas and proposals cannot offend: if
there is someone who could be offended why do those magistrates told them
those ideas and proposals? why do we all have to read about those things
that are not about ancient and nova Roma? Isn't there a kind of prosecution
to stop these abuses? this trial that is not extrema ratio?
"Maior" rory12001@... rory12001
wrote:
<-Salvete omnes:
you see I have given Priscus the cognomen "Ignotus" - meaning
unknown, low-born, ignorant. Please refer to him by this name so he
will not see his Nova Roman name glorified on this list. Frankly
laughter and derision is what he deserves.
If Ignotus is reallly a cowardly soul, I'd like to hear him
spout his racist beliefs with me in the middle of Tel Aviv or
Durham, NC:)
bene valete in Mente!
Marca Hortensia Maior>
Please, respect him to respect us. He is undergoing a trial for the same
reason of so many "pagan" in the past: his ideas are not common and someone
hates him. NR magistrates are creating a victim and your laughter and
derision make me think of Giordano Bruno and other heros of the past. Please
censores, do something against Marca Hortensia Maior! She wants us to do to
Priscus what someone did to Jews during IIWW, what a shame!
Valete!
ACC

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44343 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: stop that trial, please
Salve:

Thank you for the support. And for what it is work, and I understand by
making this statement I will surely suffer some "political fall-out" in Nova
Roma.... I do not support ANYONE in Nova Roma who is a racist, has a
misogynist viewpoint, or anyone who gets their identity or satisfaction by
hating others.

Thank you again for supporting my edicts.

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 6/11/06, Stefanie Beer <sbeer@...> wrote:
>
>
> This is why I support Consul Modianus´ edict on that matter.
> Valete,
> L.Flavia Lectrix
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44344 From: P.Memmius Albucius Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Multis .. - Piso's resignation
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus" wrote:

[some paragraphs that I will take on holidays, in order to have time to
read them], and :

> A final point. One excitable citizen seems to have decided that he
cannot bear to remain a member of the same republic as a fascist. This
person lives, I believe, in Spain. I understand that fascist parties
won several thousand votes in the Spanish general election of 2000.
Will this person be leaving Spain too, I wonder? If so, I shall be
interested to know which country he finds to live in, which contains
not a single fascist. Perhaps he'll find a happy new life in North
Korea.
(..)

I think, care Corde, that you are (much) injust. For you forget the
difference between our Republic, which is, according
our "macronational" states a non governemental organisation, and these
states, such Spain or - rather - Portugal. The main difference between
them is that you can enter and quit Nova Roma, as any NGO. But you
cannot decide that you are not Spanish anymore.
So, when you was born Spanish or Portuguese, you are not asked, for
example, whether you accept to live with all the other Spanish or
Portuguese citizens : you have no choice.
On the contrary, when you enter a NGO you do it according the
(constitutive) law of this organisation. If you seem that the contract
between this NGO and you is broken (for example because you did not
expect it to accept neo-nazis),you may leave this organisation.
At last, on the matter, I think that the question of the membership of
this citizen has not been solved yet.

Vale,

P. Memmius Albucius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44345 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Multis .. - Piso's resignation
SALVE ALBUCI!

First, I´m not spanish, nor portugues. I´m a Finn living in Portugal. Near the Spain. ( Geographic lessons, hello?!!! )
Where do I wan´t to leave? In Portugal because here nazis are a smallest minority of all the extremists. In Finland, which is my country, there are more nazis than here in Portugal.
I wouldn´t like to live in North Korea because it´s an extremist country, which repress and suffocate any kind of democracy, and yes, I´m not a communist.
I think that YOU are in this moment beeing excitable. Calm down.

Vale bene
Gaius Cassius Piso
"P.Memmius Albucius" <albucius_aoe@...> escreveu:
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus" wrote:

[some paragraphs that I will take on holidays, in order to have time to
read them], and :

> A final point. One excitable citizen seems to have decided that he
cannot bear to remain a member of the same republic as a fascist. This
person lives, I believe, in Spain. I understand that fascist parties
won several thousand votes in the Spanish general election of 2000.
Will this person be leaving Spain too, I wonder? If so, I shall be
interested to know which country he finds to live in, which contains
not a single fascist. Perhaps he'll find a happy new life in North
Korea.
(..)

I think, care Corde, that you are (much) injust. For you forget the
difference between our Republic, which is, according
our "macronational" states a non governemental organisation, and these
states, such Spain or - rather - Portugal. The main difference between
them is that you can enter and quit Nova Roma, as any NGO. But you
cannot decide that you are not Spanish anymore.
So, when you was born Spanish or Portuguese, you are not asked, for
example, whether you accept to live with all the other Spanish or
Portuguese citizens : you have no choice.
On the contrary, when you enter a NGO you do it according the
(constitutive) law of this organisation. If you seem that the contract
between this NGO and you is broken (for example because you did not
expect it to accept neo-nazis),you may leave this organisation.
At last, on the matter, I think that the question of the membership of
this citizen has not been solved yet.

Vale,

P. Memmius Albucius





__________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44346 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Multis .. - Piso's resignation
---


Salvete Cassius Piso et Omnes:

I've just read the mainlist posts, and with respect to your response
here to Albucius:

In all fairness, as I read it, it was A. Apollonius Cordus who made
the remarks you are discussing, not Albucius. Albucius was merely
responding to the original remarks of Cordus.

I thought I would clarify that.

Valete
Pompeia

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, kari piessa <legio_x_equitata@...>
wrote:
>
> SALVE ALBUCI!
>
> First, I´m not spanish, nor portugues. I´m a Finn living in
Portugal. Near the Spain. ( Geographic lessons, hello?!!! )
> Where do I wan´t to leave? In Portugal because here nazis are a
smallest minority of all the extremists. In Finland, which is my
country, there are more nazis than here in Portugal.
> I wouldn´t like to live in North Korea because it´s an extremist
country, which repress and suffocate any kind of democracy, and yes,
I´m not a communist.
> I think that YOU are in this moment beeing excitable. Calm down.
>
> Vale bene
> Gaius Cassius Piso
> "P.Memmius Albucius" <albucius_aoe@...> escreveu:
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
wrote:
>
> [some paragraphs that I will take on holidays, in order to have
time to
> read them], and :
>
> > A final point. One excitable citizen seems to have decided that
he
> cannot bear to remain a member of the same republic as a fascist.
This
> person lives, I believe, in Spain. I understand that fascist
parties
> won several thousand votes in the Spanish general election of
2000.
> Will this person be leaving Spain too, I wonder? If so, I shall be
> interested to know which country he finds to live in, which
contains
> not a single fascist. Perhaps he'll find a happy new life in North
> Korea.
> (..)
>
> I think, care Corde, that you are (much) injust. For you forget
the
> difference between our Republic, which is, according
> our "macronational" states a non governemental organisation, and
these
> states, such Spain or - rather - Portugal. The main difference
between
> them is that you can enter and quit Nova Roma, as any NGO. But you
> cannot decide that you are not Spanish anymore.
> So, when you was born Spanish or Portuguese, you are not asked,
for
> example, whether you accept to live with all the other Spanish or
> Portuguese citizens : you have no choice.
> On the contrary, when you enter a NGO you do it according the
> (constitutive) law of this organisation. If you seem that the
contract
> between this NGO and you is broken (for example because you did
not
> expect it to accept neo-nazis),you may leave this organisation.
> At last, on the matter, I think that the question of the
membership of
> this citizen has not been solved yet.
>
> Vale,
>
> P. Memmius Albucius
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
> http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44347 From: Triarius Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: STOP...STOP...STOP!!!
Salvete omnes,

After reading the volumes of posts of the past days, and after
maintaining myself from biting my tongue off (as I have been known to
speak my mind on occassion...and not to the liking of many), I have
chosen to repond to the various overall postings that I have been
reading with much sadness and irritation.

First, this organization is comprised of peoples of many ethnic,
political, socio-economic, relegious, etc. backgrounds. There are as
many opinions as there are cives. This Forum is a place where people
express those opinions. Unfortunately, some of you need to stake your
claim on your particular favorite chair at the local kindergarten or
daycare classroom.

There is NOTHING wrong with expressing your opinion, as long as you
do it in a civil tone. Some contributors to this list obviously seek
to cause disruption and stir in the crap at EVERY possible
opportunity.

I am sick and tired of discussing nazism, religious intolerance of
pagan and/or christians, and anything thing else that some of you
people wish to keep stirring up.

I am tired of the continual disrespect thrown at the Consuls,
Censors, Praetors, Propraetors, junior magistrates, cives, and new
citizens. It is intolerable, childish, and highly uncivic.

If Nova Roma does not fit into your moral belief system after you
have been a citizen for a few days, to me, I personally don't think
you knew what your belief system was to begin with...that is if you
even read the main page of this organization's website.

IF IT ISN'T WORKING OUT HERE, GO FIND AN ORGANIZATION THAT
WORKS...BUT PLEASE GO QUIETLY AND RESPECTFULLY!

If you are a nazi, socialist, facist, liberal, conservative, martian,
reeincarnated Carthaginian, or whatever, keep your opinions, beliefs,
and comments to yourself. Your political ideology, IF IT IS NOT
REPUBLICAN ROMAN, does not belong here. This is not a place to debate
your personal politics and spread your controversial agenda.

If your religious views are completely intolerant and you are
violently offended at the thought of the Traditional Roman Rites or
Roman Paganism or whatever you want to wish to call it, WHY ARE YOU
HERE?

This organization is for people who are interested in the
reconstruction of the Roman Republic in the modern age, it is not a
political/religious forum to hawk your own personal agenda and insult
everyone that does not agree with you. My mother always told me if
you have nothing good to say about someone, don't say anything at all.

If membership was based on the Roman Vitues, some of you would be
thrown out the door on your tail...personally by me.

I, like many others in this organization, are working to move this
organization out of the web domain and into the real world on a
local, regional and provincial level. It is really hard to do, when
you meet someone who is interested in our common goals and
aspirations, and then they come here and experience complete
goofballism.

Some of you obviously need to get up from your computers and go
somewhere, anywhere, it really doesn't matter. Take a nature hike or
go on a picnic. Or, go somewhere and meditate or ponder on the
possibility of the reconstruction of the Roman Republic in the modern
age via Nova Roma.

I remember a time when this list was a very valuable resource on
Rome, its religion, its politics, its virtues, its histories, its
arts, its military, its architecture, etc. Now it has become a very
good model on how not to run a Roman Republic.

I am strongly against censorship...repeat...I am strongly against
censorship. HOWEVER, I really wish that the moderators of this list
would step up and police this organization by flushing all the crap
posts that serve only to attack, criticize, or belittle others before
they are posted and the festering for another round begins anew.

Each citizen should actually go to the Roman Virtues page and READ
THEM, print them off and carry a copy of them on their person for a
daily reference.

If you can't discuss things on with civil tone and in a topic that is
generally roman-related or related to this organization and its
development, please just don't post....just don't do it!

There are young children and teenagers among us who read these posts,
can we please set some kind of respectable example for them as
virtuous or at least semi-virtous citizens?

ALSO, PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS POST IF YOU ARE LOOKING FOR A
FIGHT OR WISH TO INSULT, BARB, OR CRITICIZE!!! If this is your
primary interest, please send me an email at the below address, so I
can mark you permanently as junk mail.

Valete optime,
Triarius

P.S. Does anyone have anything positive about the Res Pvblica to
discuss?

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
L. Vitellius Triarius
a.k.a. Chip Hatcher
Praefectus Regio of Tennessee (TN/AR)
Provincia America Austrorientalis, Nova Roma
Scriba, Central Planning Team, GO ROMAN Project

http://www.angelfire.com/empire2/vitellia/
http://austrorientalis.bravehost.com/
http://www.novaroma.org/
http://www.sodalitasegressus.com/GRIndex.htm
lucius_vitellius_triarius@...

Dominus, Factio Veneta Chariot Velox Puteulanus Sors
Dominus, The Gladiator Superstes
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Quam bene vivas refert, non quam diu."
"The important thing isn't how long you live,
but how well you live" - L. Annaeus Seneca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44348 From: flavius leviticus Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
Salvete,We have had another person to join us in provisional citizenship.His name is Decimus Equitas Severes aka Brian Philips.So far I have been the only one on this board to welcome him into our Republic.Why is this?I have seen many posts for just a certain few.I think we as Romans can do a little better than that. I understand that many of us have been in a tizzy over other issues recently.I have been a little overwhelmed myself.So let it be known, I wish to welcome all who have recently found their way to our great Republic,and look forward to hearing from all of you.This is a great place to be and you shall find it very enriching in many ways.May the Gods and Goddesses of Rome protect you and enlighten you.Valete,Appius Galerius Aurelianus.Long Live the Republic of Nova Roma!

"A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...> wrote: A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

Tres homines saluto: D. Tullium Attam, D. Valerium Thomam Brunum, V. Lucretiam Camillam. Optimas vitas hac in optima re publica eis opto.

[I welcome three people: D. Tullius Atta, D. Valerius Thomas Brunus, and V. Lucretia Camilla. I wish them excellent lives in this excellent republic.]




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44349 From: Maior Date: 2006-06-11
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
-M. Hortensia Fl. Levitico spd;
I would examine him a bit more carefully his yahoo name
is 'Blackshirt' I hope he is not another neo-nazi.
vale
M. Hortensia Maior


-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, flavius leviticus <centorious@...>
wrote:
>
> Salvete,We have had another person to join us in provisional
citizenship.His name is Decimus Equitas Severes aka Brian Philips.>
Tres homines saluto: D. Tullium Attam, D. Valerium Thomam Brunum, V.
Lucretiam Camillam. Optimas vitas hac in optima re publica eis opto.
>
> [I welcome three people: D. Tullius Atta, D. Valerius Thomas
Brunus, and V. Lucretia Camilla. I wish them excellent lives in this
excellent republic.]
>
>
>
>
>>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44352 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: prid. Id. Iun.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est pridie Idus Iunius; haec dies nefastus est.

"Fortuna, the same day is yours, your temple
Founded by the same king, in the same place.
And whose is that statue hidden under draped robes?
It's Servius, that's for sure, but different reasons
Are given for the drapes, and I'm in doubt.
When the goddess fearfully confessed to a secret love,
Ashamed, since she's immortal, to mate with a man
(For she burned, seized with intense passion for the king,
And he was the only man she wasn't blind to),
She used to enter his palace at night by a little window:
So that the gate bears the name Fenestella.
She's still ashamed, and hides the beloved features
Under cloth: the king's face being covered by a robe.
Or is it rather that, after his murder, the people
Were bewildered by their gentle leader's death,
Their grief swelling, endlessly, at the sight
Of the statue, until they hid him under robes?
I must sing at greater length of a third reason,
Though I'll still keep my team on a tight rein.
Having secured her marriage by crime, Tullia
Used to incite her husband with words like these:
`What use if we're equally matched, you by my sister's
Murder, I by your brother's, in leading a virtuous life?
Better that my husband and your wife had lived,
Than that we shrink from greater achievement.
I offer my father's life and realm as my dower:
If you're a man, go take the dower I speak of.
Crime is the mark of kingship. Kill your wife's father,
Seize the kingdom, dip our hands in my father's blood.'
Urged on be such words, though a private citizen
He usurped the high throne: the people, stunned, took up arms.
With blood and slaughter the weak old man was defeated:
Tarquin the Proud snatched his father-in-law's sceptre.
Servius himself fell bleeding to the hard earth,
At the foot of the Esquiline, site of his palace.
His daughter, driving to her father's home,
Rode through the streets, erect and haughty.
When her driver saw the king's body, he halted
In tears. She reproved him in these terms:
`Go on, or do you seek the bitter fruits of virtue?
Drive the unwilling wheels, I say, over his face.'
A certain proof of this is Evil Street, named
After her, while eternal infamy marks the deed.
Yet she still dared to visit her father's temple,
His monument: what I tell is strange but true.
There was a statue enthroned, an image of Servius:
They say it put a hand to its eyes,
And a voice was heard: `Hide my face,
Lest it view my own wicked daughter.'
It was veiled by cloth, Fortune refused to let the robe
Be removed, and she herself spoke from her temple:
`The day when Servius' face is next revealed,
Will be a day when shame is cast aside.'
Women, beware of touching the forbidden cloth,
(It's sufficient to utter prayers in solemn tones)
And let him who was the City's seventh king
Keep his head covered, forever, by this veil.
The temple once burned: but the fire spared
The statue: Mulciber himself preserved his son.
For Servius' father was Vulcan, and the lovely
Ocresia of Corniculum his mother.
Once, performing sacred rites with her in the due manner,
Tanaquil ordered her to pour wine on the garlanded hearth:
There was, or seemed to be, the form of a male organ
In the ashes: the shape was really there in fact.
The captive girl sat on the hearth, as commanded:
She conceived Servius, born of divine seed.
His father showed his paternity by touching the child's
Head with fire, and a cap of flames glowed on his hair." - Ovid, Fasti VI

"At that time an incident took place as marvellous in the appearance
as it proved in the result. It is said that whilst a boy named Servius
Tullius was asleep, his head was enveloped in flames, before the eyes
of many who were present. The cry which broke out at such a marvellous
sight aroused the royal family, and when one of the domestics was
bringing water to quench the flames the queen stopped him, and after
calming the excitement forbade the boy to be disturbed until he awoke
of his own accord. Presently he did so, and the flames disappeared.
Then Tanaquil took her husband aside and said to him, "Do you see this
boy, whom we are bringing up in such a humble style? You may be
certain that he will one day be a light to us in trouble and
perplexity, and a protection to our tottering house. Let us henceforth
bring up with all care and indulgence one who will be the source of
measureless glory to the State and to ourselves." From this time the
boy began to be treated as their child and trained in those
accomplishments by which characters are stimulated to the pursuit of a
great destiny. The task was an easy one, for it was carrying out the
will of the gods. The youth turned out to be of a truly kingly
disposition, and when search was made for a son-in-law to Tarquinius,
none of the Roman youths could be compared with him in any respect, so
the king betrothed his daughter to him. The bestowal of this great
honour upon him, whatever the reason for it, forbids our believing
that he was the son of a slave, and, in his boyhood, a slave himself.
I am more inclined to the opinion of those who say that in the capture
of Corniculum, Servius Tullius, the leading man of that city, was
killed, and his wife, who was about to become a mother, was recognised
amongst the other captive women, and in consequence of her high rank
was exempted from servitude by the Roman queen, and gave birth to a
son in the house of Priscus Tarquinius. This kind treatment
strengthened the intimacy between the women, and the boy, brought up
as he was from infancy in the royal household, was held in affection
and honour. It was the fate of his mother, who fell into the hands of
the enemy when her native city was taken, that made people think he
was the son of a slave." -Livy, History of Rome I.39

"Servius had been summoned by a breathless messenger, and arrived on
the scene while Tarquin was speaking. As soon as he reached the
vestibule, he exclaimed in loud tones, "What is the meaning of this,
Tarquin? How dared you, with such insolence, convene the senate or sit
in that chair whilst I am alive?" Tarquin replied fiercely that he was
occupying his father's seat, that a king's son was a much more
legitimate heir to the throne than a slave, and that he, Servius, in
playing his reckless game, had insulted his masters long enough.
Shouts arose from their respective partisans, the people made a rush
to the senate-house, and it was evident that he who won the fight
would reign. Then Tarquin, forced by sheer necessity into proceeding
to the last extremity, seized Servius round the waist, and being a
much younger and stronger man, carried him out of the senate-house and
flung him down the steps into the Forum below. He then returned to
call the senate to order. The officers and attendants of the king
fled. The king himself, half dead from the violence, was put to death
by those whom Tarquin had sent in pursuit of him. It is the current
belief that this was done at Tullia's suggestion, for it is quite in
keeping with the rest of her wickedness. At all events, it is
generally agreed that she drove down to the Forum in a two-wheeled
car, and, unabashed by the presence of the crowd, called her husband
out of the senate-house and was the first to salute him as king. He
told her to make her way out of the tumult, and when on her return she
had got as far as the top of the Cyprius Vicus, where the temple of
Diana lately stood, and was turning to the right on the Urbius Clivus,
to get to the Esquiline, the driver stopped horror-struck and pulled
up, and pointed out to his mistress the corpse of the murdered
Servius. Then, the tradition runs, a foul and unnatural crime was
committed, the memory of which the place still bears, for they call it
the Vicus Sceleratus. It is said that Tullia, goaded to madness by the
avenging spirits of her sister and her husband, drove right over her
father's body, and carried back some of her father's blood with which
the car and she herself were defiled to her own and her husband's
household gods, through whose anger a reign which began in wickedness
was soon brought to a close by a like cause. Servius Tullius reigned
forty-four years, and even a wise and good successor would have found
it difficult to fill the throne as he had done. The glory of his reign
was all the greater because with him perished all just and lawful
kingship in Rome. Gentle and moderate as his sway had been, he had
nevertheless, according to some authorities, formed the intention of
laying it down, because it was vested in a single person, but this
purpose of giving freedom to the State was cut short by that domestic
crime." - op. cit. I.48

"Two temple custodians in the City of Rome announced portents; one
stated that a crested snake had been seen by several persons in the
Temple of Fortune; the other declared that two distinct portents had
appeared in the Temple of Fortuna Primigenia on the Quirinal, a palm
tree sprang up in the temple precinct and a rain of blood had fallen
in the daytime." - op. cit. XLIII.13

On this day in 243 BC Servius Tullius dedicated one of three temples
to Fortuna on the Quirinal, just inside the Porta Collina, which gave
their name to the district. The principal one of these three seems to
have been that of the Praenestine goddess who was known officially at
Rome as Fortuna Publica Populi Romani Quiritium Primigenia.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Livy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44353 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: New Graphic Site
Note: forwarded message attached.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44354 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Multis .. - Piso's resignation/apology for Albicius
SALVE ALBICE!

I owe you and apology! Yesterday when I read your mail I was so tired that I didn´t repair that you were only citing the post sent by Cordus and the words were his, not yours. Errare humanum est. I hope you accept my apology. It was my mistake. It was only misunderstanding.

Vale bene!
Gaius Cassius Piso

"P.Memmius Albucius" <albucius_aoe@...> escreveu:
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus" wrote:

[some paragraphs that I will take on holidays, in order to have time to
read them], and :

> A final point. One excitable citizen seems to have decided that he
cannot bear to remain a member of the same republic as a fascist. This
person lives, I believe, in Spain. I understand that fascist parties
won several thousand votes in the Spanish general election of 2000.
Will this person be leaving Spain too, I wonder? If so, I shall be
interested to know which country he finds to live in, which contains
not a single fascist. Perhaps he'll find a happy new life in North
Korea.
(..)

I think, care Corde, that you are (much) injust. For you forget the
difference between our Republic, which is, according
our "macronational" states a non governemental organisation, and these
states, such Spain or - rather - Portugal. The main difference between
them is that you can enter and quit Nova Roma, as any NGO. But you
cannot decide that you are not Spanish anymore.
So, when you was born Spanish or Portuguese, you are not asked, for
example, whether you accept to live with all the other Spanish or
Portuguese citizens : you have no choice.
On the contrary, when you enter a NGO you do it according the
(constitutive) law of this organisation. If you seem that the contract
between this NGO and you is broken (for example because you did not
expect it to accept neo-nazis),you may leave this organisation.
At last, on the matter, I think that the question of the membership of
this citizen has not been solved yet.

Vale,

P. Memmius Albucius





__________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44355 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Roman Outfits
Salvete omnes,

I have been planning to purchase some Roman outfits but alas the
quest is quite frustrating.

I would like to buy complete outfits in one set; for example a
complete legionaires outfit all together with the tunic, lorca,
belt, helmet, sandals, sword, scabbard and all in one sort of
package put together by somone who knows what he or she is doing
since it is easy to forget certain items and annoying to hunt
through list after list as well as the costs of shipping 20 or more
things scattered at different sites.

I do not usually buy china and pottery either as merchants like
selling items piece by piece. Give it all from plates to goblets in
a dinner set for 6 in one package or I don't bother buying.

Anyway if any citizens would have information on where to buy Roman
outfits in sets, I would sure appreciate if you let me know where.


Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44356 From: dicconf Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: New Graphic Site
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Alysen Tellure wrote:

> Note: forwarded message attached.

Unfortunately Yahoo! does not support attachments to e-mail. Can you
include the information in the text of your message instead?

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44357 From: rocknrockabilly Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
Salve,

"Blackshirt" does not mean anything related to neonazism... Enough
suspicion and more trust, especially toward our new citizens!!! If we
keep creating such climate of fear and distrust, how will we attract
new members?

I warmly welcome our new citizens and, despite the heated debates
of the past days, may they feel themselves at home in Nova Roma!

Titus Africanus Secundus Flamininus.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> -M. Hortensia Fl. Levitico spd;
> I would examine him a bit more carefully his yahoo name
> is 'Blackshirt' I hope he is not another neo-nazi.
> vale
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
>
> -- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, flavius leviticus <centorious@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete,We have had another person to join us in provisional
> citizenship.His name is Decimus Equitas Severes aka Brian Philips.>
> Tres homines saluto: D. Tullium Attam, D. Valerium Thomam Brunum,
V.
> Lucretiam Camillam. Optimas vitas hac in optima re publica eis opto.
> >
> > [I welcome three people: D. Tullius Atta, D. Valerius Thomas
> Brunus, and V. Lucretia Camilla. I wish them excellent lives in
this
> excellent republic.]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44358 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Roman Outfits
C. Equitius Cato Q. Seutonio Paulino quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salve et salvete.

On a similiar note: is it appropriate for *any* Roman citizen to wear
the kit of a Roman soldier? In other words, can I supplement my toga
with military dress?

Vale et valete,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael
Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I have been planning to purchase some Roman outfits but alas the
> quest is quite frustrating.
>
> I would like to buy complete outfits in one set; for example a
> complete legionaires outfit all together with the tunic, lorca,
> belt, helmet, sandals, sword, scabbard and all in one sort of
> package put together by somone who knows what he or she is doing
> since it is easy to forget certain items and annoying to hunt
> through list after list as well as the costs of shipping 20 or more
> things scattered at different sites.
>
> I do not usually buy china and pottery either as merchants like
> selling items piece by piece. Give it all from plates to goblets in
> a dinner set for 6 in one package or I don't bother buying.
>
> Anyway if any citizens would have information on where to buy Roman
> outfits in sets, I would sure appreciate if you let me know where.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44359 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
Salve Tite Flamini,

rocknrockabilly <franceuropa@...> writes:

> "Blackshirt" does not mean anything related to neonazism...

Are you sure of that? Or is that simply an assertion? An investigation into
this applicant's web behaviors suggests that he associates with other groups
that appear, upon first blush, to be fascist in nature.

I urge all here to be civil to every new member. But there's no need to be so
open-minded that your brain falls out. People choose their e-mail names for
their own reasons most of the time.

Still, I urge all Nova Romans to practice the virtue of Civitas.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44360 From: rocknrockabilly Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
Salve Equite Marine,

I agree with you, all Nova Romans must respect the Civitas.
"Blackshirt" is also the name of a comics character, the "gentleman
crook." Yet, I agree that one must be fan of the 1920s comics in
order to adopt such name...

Vale bene,*

Titus Africanus Secundus Flamininus.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "CN•EQVIT•MARINVS \(Gnaeus Equitius
Marinus\)" <gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Tite Flamini,
>
> rocknrockabilly <franceuropa@...> writes:
>
> > "Blackshirt" does not mean anything related to neonazism...
>
> Are you sure of that? Or is that simply an assertion? An
investigation into
> this applicant's web behaviors suggests that he associates with
other groups
> that appear, upon first blush, to be fascist in nature.
>
> I urge all here to be civil to every new member. But there's no
need to be so
> open-minded that your brain falls out. People choose their e-mail
names for
> their own reasons most of the time.
>
> Still, I urge all Nova Romans to practice the virtue of Civitas.
>
> Vale,
>
> CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44361 From: dicconf Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, CN~UEQVIT~UMARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Marinus) wrote:

> Salve Tite Flamini,
>
> rocknrockabilly <franceuropa@...> writes:
>
>> "Blackshirt" does not mean anything related to neonazism...
>
> Are you sure of that? Or is that simply an assertion? An investigation into
> this applicant's web behaviors suggests that he associates with other groups
> that appear, upon first blush, to be fascist in nature.

Just as a matter of historical accuracy, "blackshirts" -- in Italian,
"camissa nera" -- were the followers of Mussolini's Fascist party. The
Nazis were an entirely different organization and though some of them --
those who were later called the SS -- wore black shirts, most wore brown
shirts and were _called_ brownshirts, or "Sturmabtielung" -- in English,
"Storm Troopers". The Fascists were an obnoxious bunch of authoritarians,
but they did not practice the Aryan-race nonsense or the race-hate that
led to the Holocaust, nor did they go in for concentration camps. Using
"Fascist" to mean "Nazis, or anybody else on the far right" is a Leftist
practice introduced by the Communists back in the 1920s when Fascists
were the most influential right-wing nuts. They simply refused to admit
they were oversimplifying things when the Nazis (and, later, Franco's
Falangists, the Romanian Garda de Fier, or the French Croix de Feu) put in
an appearance. Nowadays, of course, the term is used rubber-stamp-fashion
by people who weren't even born when the real Fascists existed.

> I urge all here to be civil to every new member. But there's no need to be so
> open-minded that your brain falls out. People choose their e-mail names for
> their own reasons most of the time.
>
> Still, I urge all Nova Romans to practice the virtue of Civitas.

And if we can get our mundane political commentators to do so as well, all
the better.

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44362 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Roman Outfits
Salve C. Equiti Cato,

I don't see why not for re-enactment purposes or public
demonstrations. Most of the rime I'd have it displayed on a
manniquin or layed out in order for people to see who might have
interest in Roman things. On the other hand I would not wear the
uniform around of a modern day existing military force; that would
not be appropriate in my opinion.


Regards,

QSP









-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato Q. Seutonio Paulino quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salve et salvete.
>
> On a similiar note: is it appropriate for *any* Roman citizen to
wear
> the kit of a Roman soldier? In other words, can I supplement my
toga
> with military dress?
>
> Vale et valete,
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
(Michael
> Kelly)" <mjk@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > I have been planning to purchase some Roman outfits but alas the
> > quest is quite frustrating.
> >
> > I would like to buy complete outfits in one set; for example a
> > complete legionaires outfit all together with the tunic, lorca,
> > belt, helmet, sandals, sword, scabbard and all in one sort of
> > package put together by somone who knows what he or she is doing
> > since it is easy to forget certain items and annoying to hunt
> > through list after list as well as the costs of shipping 20 or
more
> > things scattered at different sites.
> >
> > I do not usually buy china and pottery either as merchants like
> > selling items piece by piece. Give it all from plates to goblets
in
> > a dinner set for 6 in one package or I don't bother buying.
> >
> > Anyway if any citizens would have information on where to buy
Roman
> > outfits in sets, I would sure appreciate if you let me know
where.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44363 From: dicconf Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: "New Graphics Website" posting
Yare! The same message has been showing up on the CAW and Pagan Spirit
Gathering email lists. Looks like one of those viruses that grabs
people's address books and retransmits itself hither and yond.

-- Publius Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44364 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Roman Outfits
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica Q. Suetonio Paulino quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
> omnibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I have been planning to purchase some Roman outfits but alas the
> quest is quite frustrating.
>
> I would like to buy complete outfits in one set; for example a
> complete legionaires outfit all together with the tunic, lorca,
> belt, helmet, sandals, sword, scabbard and all in one sort of
> package put together by somone who knows what he or she is doing
> since it is easy to forget certain items and annoying to hunt
> through list after list as well as the costs of shipping 20 or more
> things scattered at different sites.
>
>
> ATS: Generally, items are sold separately, not as outfits, though
> occasionally a legionary will dispose of everything at once, asking a price in
> the four-figure range. Again, Q. Darius Macro of Legio XX and Gallio Velius
> Marsallas of Legio XXIV and their respective websites might be of some
> assistance. Particularly with regard to the armor and weapons, different
> types prevailed in different times and places, though there was no such thing
> as a uniform per se, so one must be careful to get a sword, dagger, helmet,
> lorica, etc., from the same period; you might want to contact the commander of
> the nearest active legio to see what period they represent and what is
> appropriate.
>
> QSP: I do not usually buy china and pottery either as merchants like
> selling items piece by piece. Give it all from plates to goblets in
> a dinner set for 6 in one package or I don't bother buying.
>
> ATS: Gee, the ones I have seen much prefer to sell sets at high prices
> rather than separately, or what is called Œopen stock.¹
>
> Anyway if any citizens would have information on where to buy Roman
> outfits in sets, I would sure appreciate if you let me know where.
>
> ATS: In addition to our macellum merchants, including La Wren¹s Nest, and
> Deepeeka (for armor, but only wholesale), there are other merchants listed on
> the Legio XX website, and I seem to recall a European citizen who did such
> work. There is also Merchant Adventurers, which deals strictly in clothing
> and accessories.
>
> Regards,
>
> Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44365 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Roman Outfits
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Equitio Catoni quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
>
> C. Equitius Cato Q. Seutonio Paulino quiritibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salve et salvete.
>
> On a similiar note: is it appropriate for *any* Roman citizen to wear
> the kit of a Roman soldier? In other words, can I supplement my toga
> with military dress?
>
> ATS: Sure. Some people reenact as both soldiers and civilians...but
> preferably you should link up with one of the legiones (maybe XXIV in
> Philadelphia) so that everything is appropriate for a given period and that
> you aren¹t wearing a helmet from the third century AD and a segmentata from
> rather earlier. Styles changed over time. I recommend consulting the Legio
> XX and XXIV websites...
>
> Vale et valete,
>
> Cato
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> Scholastica
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael
> Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Salvete omnes,
>> >
>> > I have been planning to purchase some Roman outfits but alas the
>> > quest is quite frustrating.
>> >
>> > I would like to buy complete outfits in one set; for example a
>> > complete legionaires outfit all together with the tunic, lorca,
>> > belt, helmet, sandals, sword, scabbard and all in one sort of
>> > package put together by somone who knows what he or she is doing
>> > since it is easy to forget certain items and annoying to hunt
>> > through list after list as well as the costs of shipping 20 or more
>> > things scattered at different sites.
>> >
>> > I do not usually buy china and pottery either as merchants like
>> > selling items piece by piece. Give it all from plates to goblets in
>> > a dinner set for 6 in one package or I don't bother buying.
>> >
>> > Anyway if any citizens would have information on where to buy Roman
>> > outfits in sets, I would sure appreciate if you let me know where.
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>> >
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44366 From: kari piessa Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: STOP...STOP...STOP!!!
SALVE TRIARI!

Wise words. As you may have noticed, I´m impulsive person but this doesn´t mean that my intensions are automaticly bad ones. When a debate get´s heated...well, you allready saw what happens. The same thing that happens everywhere in the world, disorder.
A history of the ancient Rome is full of impulsive people. For good or for bad...
It depends how every individual interprates certain events of roman history.
Anyhow we don´t live in ancient Rome but in modern NR.
In one thing I strongly agree with you: the heated and impulsive opinions posted here or everywhere else are highly uncivic.
I regognize my mistakes publicly. Therefore I apologize everyone who I may have offended at the moments of heated discussion.
Triarius is right, these actions don´t leave new-romans or a proper NR to anywhere. A lack of respect is a sad thing and I hope that everyone, especially I myself will remember this in the future.

Vale et valete!
Gaius Cassius Piso


Triarius <lucius_vitellius_triarius@...> escreveu:
Salvete omnes,

After reading the volumes of posts of the past days, and after
maintaining myself from biting my tongue off (as I have been known to
speak my mind on occassion...and not to the liking of many), I have
chosen to repond to the various overall postings that I have been
reading with much sadness and irritation.

First, this organization is comprised of peoples of many ethnic,
political, socio-economic, relegious, etc. backgrounds. There are as
many opinions as there are cives. This Forum is a place where people
express those opinions. Unfortunately, some of you need to stake your
claim on your particular favorite chair at the local kindergarten or
daycare classroom.

There is NOTHING wrong with expressing your opinion, as long as you
do it in a civil tone. Some contributors to this list obviously seek
to cause disruption and stir in the crap at EVERY possible
opportunity.

I am sick and tired of discussing nazism, religious intolerance of
pagan and/or christians, and anything thing else that some of you
people wish to keep stirring up.

I am tired of the continual disrespect thrown at the Consuls,
Censors, Praetors, Propraetors, junior magistrates, cives, and new
citizens. It is intolerable, childish, and highly uncivic.

If Nova Roma does not fit into your moral belief system after you
have been a citizen for a few days, to me, I personally don't think
you knew what your belief system was to begin with...that is if you
even read the main page of this organization's website.

IF IT ISN'T WORKING OUT HERE, GO FIND AN ORGANIZATION THAT
WORKS...BUT PLEASE GO QUIETLY AND RESPECTFULLY!

If you are a nazi, socialist, facist, liberal, conservative, martian,
reeincarnated Carthaginian, or whatever, keep your opinions, beliefs,
and comments to yourself. Your political ideology, IF IT IS NOT
REPUBLICAN ROMAN, does not belong here. This is not a place to debate
your personal politics and spread your controversial agenda.

If your religious views are completely intolerant and you are
violently offended at the thought of the Traditional Roman Rites or
Roman Paganism or whatever you want to wish to call it, WHY ARE YOU
HERE?

This organization is for people who are interested in the
reconstruction of the Roman Republic in the modern age, it is not a
political/religious forum to hawk your own personal agenda and insult
everyone that does not agree with you. My mother always told me if
you have nothing good to say about someone, don't say anything at all.

If membership was based on the Roman Vitues, some of you would be
thrown out the door on your tail...personally by me.

I, like many others in this organization, are working to move this
organization out of the web domain and into the real world on a
local, regional and provincial level. It is really hard to do, when
you meet someone who is interested in our common goals and
aspirations, and then they come here and experience complete
goofballism.

Some of you obviously need to get up from your computers and go
somewhere, anywhere, it really doesn't matter. Take a nature hike or
go on a picnic. Or, go somewhere and meditate or ponder on the
possibility of the reconstruction of the Roman Republic in the modern
age via Nova Roma.

I remember a time when this list was a very valuable resource on
Rome, its religion, its politics, its virtues, its histories, its
arts, its military, its architecture, etc. Now it has become a very
good model on how not to run a Roman Republic.

I am strongly against censorship...repeat...I am strongly against
censorship. HOWEVER, I really wish that the moderators of this list
would step up and police this organization by flushing all the crap
posts that serve only to attack, criticize, or belittle others before
they are posted and the festering for another round begins anew.

Each citizen should actually go to the Roman Virtues page and READ
THEM, print them off and carry a copy of them on their person for a
daily reference.

If you can't discuss things on with civil tone and in a topic that is
generally roman-related or related to this organization and its
development, please just don't post....just don't do it!

There are young children and teenagers among us who read these posts,
can we please set some kind of respectable example for them as
virtuous or at least semi-virtous citizens?

ALSO, PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS POST IF YOU ARE LOOKING FOR A
FIGHT OR WISH TO INSULT, BARB, OR CRITICIZE!!! If this is your
primary interest, please send me an email at the below address, so I
can mark you permanently as junk mail.

Valete optime,
Triarius

P.S. Does anyone have anything positive about the Res Pvblica to
discuss?

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
L. Vitellius Triarius
a.k.a. Chip Hatcher
Praefectus Regio of Tennessee (TN/AR)
Provincia America Austrorientalis, Nova Roma
Scriba, Central Planning Team, GO ROMAN Project

http://www.angelfire.com/empire2/vitellia/
http://austrorientalis.bravehost.com/
http://www.novaroma.org/
http://www.sodalitasegressus.com/GRIndex.htm
lucius_vitellius_triarius@...

Dominus, Factio Veneta Chariot Velox Puteulanus Sors
Dominus, The Gladiator Superstes
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Quam bene vivas refert, non quam diu."
"The important thing isn't how long you live,
but how well you live" - L. Annaeus Seneca





__________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44367 From: Robert Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
Valete all.These messages about the new site have a hijacker within.It
took control of my e-mail send function, and began to spread its
message to all on my list before I ran a search.I was able to stop it
from delivering to more sites, but it still attempts to send without
its intended result.Now my box is filled with failure to send
notices.Just opening the message will do it.Valete,Appius Galerius
Aurelianus,Semper Fidelis!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44368 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
Salvi Appi Galeri,

Sigh, you know Iam no fan of Sharia law but I must confess that there
are some days like today where I'd like to see some of these malicious
hackers brought before such a court and have their damn fingers
amputated, encouraging others like them to think a good 10x before
pulling these stunts. Excuse my evil little thoughts but anyway I hope
you are able to resolve your problem that is now interfering with your
business with Nova Roma.

Regards,

QSP



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert" <centorious@...> wrote:
>
> Valete all.These messages about the new site have a hijacker
within.It
> took control of my e-mail send function, and began to spread its
> message to all on my list before I ran a search.I was able to stop
it
> from delivering to more sites, but it still attempts to send without
> its intended result.Now my box is filled with failure to send
> notices.Just opening the message will do it.Valete,Appius Galerius
> Aurelianus,Semper Fidelis!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44369 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Roman Outfits
In a message dated 6/12/2006 9:05:40 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
mlcinnyc@... writes:
On a similiar note: is it appropriate for *any* Roman citizen to wear
the kit of a Roman soldier? In other words, can I supplement my toga
with military dress
In Rome, only if you were on duty outside the city. Otherwise, you as
Patrician would only wear your tunica and armor if you were off to campaign, coming
home from campaign, taking part in an Ovation or Triumph. Even the Praetorian
Guard had to wear togas while on guard duty. Rome was very careful not to
let the people think that they were occupied by a military force.

Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44370 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Are you going to Pagan Spirit Gathering?

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 6/12/06, dicconf <dicconf@...> wrote:
>
>
> Yare! The same message has been showing up on the CAW and Pagan Spirit
> Gathering email lists. Looks like one of those viruses that grabs
> people's address books and retransmits itself hither and yond.
>
> -- Publius Livius Triarius
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44371 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: test
Salvete omnes,

Messages aren't appearing quick enough today; just a test.

QSP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44372 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Free Speech?
So is there free speech or not within Nova Roma?
Does NR have American style political free speech where anything goes?
Does NR have European style political free speech where anything goes unless
it's offensive?
Does NR have Leninist style political free speech where anything goes but
the gov't gets to shoot you?
--
>|P. Dominus Antonius|<
Tony Dah m

Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius
Islam religio pacis, nex omnibus dissentint.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44373 From: antistoicus Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
"Robert" <centorious@...> wrote:

> Valete all.These messages about the new site have a

"New Graphics site"?

> hijacker within.It took control of my e-mail send function,
> and began to spread its message to all on my list before I
> ran a search.I was able to stop it from delivering to more sites,


How? I'm having the same trouble, right now. The only thought
I've had so far has been the incredibly time consuming one of
setting up an alternative e-mail address rerouting to my box,
confirming it as an alternative e-address for yahoogroups, and
then switching my memberships to the new address, so that e-mail
from my yahoo e-mail account to those groups will bounce. (I
always post from the site, so this is not a problem).

But this doesn't stop this hacker's gift from e-mailing people
I know. I hope you came up with something better. I've not
had this problem before, so I can only guess as to what to do,
and I don't have any good guesses at this point.


Antistoicus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44374 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: [Fwd: petition in favor of Classics in Portugal]
Tacky, Censor, definitely tacky and very diplomatically challenged. You should consider that he might have been translating through a service. Regardless of how much frustration you might feel, it is expected that you will always be tactful in your capacity as one of the senior magistrates.

Aurelianus

-----Original Message-----
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 21:32:31 -0400
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: [Fwd: petition in favor of Classics in Portugal]


Salve Agricola,

M. Lucretius Agricola wrote:

> I can say that I know Cn. Equitius Marinus and I cannot bring myself to
> believe that he is a man who would call anyone an idiot. I am not sure
> that you understood him rightly.

In fact he did not understand me. Thank you for your kind words.

What I did say to this person, in a private note, was that a public post
of resignation has no legal meaning. He will have to write to the
censors at censores@... in order to resign. After several
exchanges along these lines, with him continually insisting that I was
censoring him, I asked him if he was always this stupid, or if he had
practiced.

Vale,

-- Marinus




Yahoo! Groups Links




________________________________________________________________________
Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44375 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Roman Outfits
Salve A. Tullia Scholastica,

I'll check these sites out and look foward to getting some gear.
Thank you for your help and suggestions!

Regards,

QSP



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
<fororom@...> wrote:
>
> > A. Tullia Scholastica C. Equitio Catoni quiritibus, sociis,
peregrinisque
> > bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
> >
> >
> >
> > C. Equitius Cato Q. Seutonio Paulino quiritibusque S.P.D.
> >
> > Salve et salvete.
> >
> > On a similiar note: is it appropriate for *any* Roman citizen to
wear
> > the kit of a Roman soldier? In other words, can I supplement
my toga
> > with military dress?
> >
> > ATS: Sure. Some people reenact as both soldiers and
civilians...but
> > preferably you should link up with one of the legiones (maybe
XXIV in
> > Philadelphia) so that everything is appropriate for a given
period and that
> > you aren¹t wearing a helmet from the third century AD and a
segmentata from
> > rather earlier. Styles changed over time. I recommend
consulting the Legio
> > XX and XXIV websites...
> >
> > Vale et valete,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> > Vale, et valete,
> >
> > Scholastica
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%
40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael
> > Kelly)" <mjk@> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Salvete omnes,
> >> >
> >> > I have been planning to purchase some Roman outfits but alas
the
> >> > quest is quite frustrating.
> >> >
> >> > I would like to buy complete outfits in one set; for example a
> >> > complete legionaires outfit all together with the tunic,
lorca,
> >> > belt, helmet, sandals, sword, scabbard and all in one sort of
> >> > package put together by somone who knows what he or she is
doing
> >> > since it is easy to forget certain items and annoying to hunt
> >> > through list after list as well as the costs of shipping 20
or more
> >> > things scattered at different sites.
> >> >
> >> > I do not usually buy china and pottery either as merchants
like
> >> > selling items piece by piece. Give it all from plates to
goblets in
> >> > a dinner set for 6 in one package or I don't bother buying.
> >> >
> >> > Anyway if any citizens would have information on where to buy
Roman
> >> > outfits in sets, I would sure appreciate if you let me know
where.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> >
> >> > Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
> >> >
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44376 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
---


Salvete Livius et Omnes:

Thank you for your information....but...

a flower by any other name (no pun intended)....Nazis, plain ole'
Fascists, brown shirts, black shirts, purply pink shirts....the root
attitudes are pretty much the same...... I don't believe that we
collectively want or need this kind of agenda.

This link contains a political science perspective of the
characteristics of Fascism, plus other interesting elements...and it
applies, it would seem, to both 'good' fascists and 'bad'
fascists :) They are just fascists...that is common denominator....
Google around, there are more, but this is more from a political
science perspective.


http://www.couplescompany.com/Features/Politics/Structure3.htm

I appreciate your information, but I have to ask, and this isn't
aimed at you Livius...but...If people don't want to celebrate and
embrace the culture, religion virtues NR holds dear, then why on
earth are they bothering with NR? One would think such individuals,
regardless of shirt colour, would be involved in a more fascist-
centered forum.

Because this is not a fascist organization and in the remotest
forseeable future, it is not going to be either.

Valete
Pompeia





Pompeia
In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, dicconf <dicconf@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> (snip)
>
> >
>
> Just as a matter of historical accuracy, "blackshirts" -- in
Italian,
> "camissa nera" -- were the followers of Mussolini's Fascist
party. The
> Nazis were an entirely different organization and though some of
them --
> those who were later called the SS -- wore black shirts, most wore
brown
> shirts and were _called_ brownshirts, or "Sturmabtielung" -- in
English,
> "Storm Troopers". The Fascists were an obnoxious bunch of
authoritarians,
> but they did not practice the Aryan-race nonsense or the race-hate
that
> led to the Holocaust, nor did they go in for concentration camps.
Using
> "Fascist" to mean "Nazis, or anybody else on the far right" is a
Leftist
> practice introduced by the Communists back in the 1920s when
Fascists
> were the most influential right-wing nuts. They simply refused to
admit
> they were oversimplifying things when the Nazis (and, later,
Franco's
> Falangists, the Romanian Garda de Fier, or the French Croix de Feu)
9 put in
> an appearance. Nowadays, of course, the term is used rubber-stamp-
fashion
> by people who weren't even born when the real Fascists existed.
>
> > (snip)
>
> And if we can get our mundane political commentators to do so as
well, all
> the better.
>
> -- Publius Livius Triarius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44377 From: antistoicus Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
"Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:

> Salvi Appi Galeri,
>
> Sigh, you know Iam no fan of Sharia law but I must
> confess that there are some days like today where
> I'd like to see some of these malicious
> hackers brought before such a court and have their
> damn fingers amputated, encouraging others like them
> to think a good 10x before pulling these stunts.

No, no. Not amputation. Throw them into a flooded arena
with a hungry alligator, and toss a steak knife into
the water as thir only weapon. Dull the alligator's
teeth and slightly weaken his jaws so that it isn't
all over, too quickly.

Pimply faced 35 year old hacker stands shaking in the
waters, having just dodged the rain of arrows with
which his entrance was saluted, to a mass cry of
"dance, scriptkiddie, dance!" Sounding every bit the
overgrown adolescent he is, he cries out "uh, we who
are about to die, salute y ..." CRUNCH! SNAP! "Aieeee!"

But I mean that in a nice way.


Antistoicus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44378 From: Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Salve Modianus,

I've never been to one and I'd like to go, but I'm not sure when or where it
will be.

Vale,
F. Martiana


On 6/12/06, David Kling (Modianus) <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Are you going to Pagan Spirit Gathering?
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
>
> On 6/12/06, dicconf <dicconf@... <dicconf%40radix.net>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Yare! The same message has been showing up on the CAW and Pagan Spirit
> > Gathering email lists. Looks like one of those viruses that grabs
> > people's address books and retransmits itself hither and yond.
> >
> > -- Publius Livius Triarius
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>



--
Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis

"Leve fit, quod bene fertur, onus."
(The burden which is borne well becomes light) - Ovid

My Yahoo page
http://360.yahoo.com/minervalis_barnowl


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44379 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Salve Publi Antoni,

P. Dominus Antonius wrote:
> So is there free speech or not within Nova Roma?

There is.

> Does NR have American style political free speech where anything goes?
> Does NR have European style political free speech where anything goes unless
> it's offensive?

Nova Roma is incorporated both in the United States and the European
Union. As such we have to be mindful of the laws under which we are
incorporated.

Vale,

-- Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44380 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
antistoicus wrote:
> How?

Salve,

In your e-mail program, check under "Preferences" for something along
the lines of "Enable javascript in e-mails" and deselect that option.
It's probably under a group of preferences called "Advanced" or similar.
Presto! No more problems with this particular brand of "virii".

As a common precaution, whenever installing new software, especially
web-related, check through the options and, if you aren't sure you need
a particular service, deselect it. Do the exact opposite with antivirus
programs and firewalls where you want most everything turned on. If it
makes the software no longer function, reenable it. Javascript in
e-mails is one of those that more sensible e-mail programs generally
have disabled by default.

Old programs *COUGHoutlookCOUGH* even opened attachments using the
system's standard viewer for that filetype by default. That particular
insanity was ended REALLY quick, while this one's still exploitable on
some software.

As to self-replicating and -spreading virii, don't blame the
scriptkiddies and hackers who abuse the bugs in your programs, blame the
inept companies who sell you insufficiently tested software and, more
often than not, require you to pay even more money for bugfixes. Said
bugfixes generally not being available until several months after the
first exploits show up.

Take the old "lovesan"-virus, that spread once XP hit the markets, which
caused "clean" computers to be infected in as little as 90 seconds after
being initially connected to the 'net.
* The only reason it could spread like it did was because Microsoft
deliberately put in a function that allowed external systems, presumably
their tech support but in actuality anyone who felt like it, to run
software on your computer.
* The only reason the it repeatedly crashed computers was because of a
bug in Window's own code when terminating such external connections.
* The only thing it did, besides highlight the vulnerability, was attack
Microsoft's own website.
In short, a clear-cut case of a hacker finding and bringing a security
problem to light. When dealing with open-source software, the hacker
would probably have submitted a patch/bugfix instead, thus contributing
directly rather than indirectly.

*cough* Sorry about that, I do rant occasionally.

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44381 From: Tim Peters Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: New Graphic Site
Salvete,

dicconf schrieb:
> On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Alysen Tellure wrote:
>
>> Note: forwarded message attached.
>
> Unfortunately Yahoo! does not support attachments to e-mail.

Actually, Yahoo generally does allow attachments. But the list admins
have wisely set this group not to accept any - a necessary precaution
against viruses, trojans and the like, as well as against huge amounts
of data that some members' email clients will not be able to handle.

--
Regards,
Titus Flavius Calvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44382 From: Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Salvete,

That message (spelled "Grapgics") appeared a few times at the Haven of
Kindred Spirits group too. I opened one, but after de-bugging my laptop, it
appears that no harm was done - I hope!

Valete,
F. Martiana Gangalia Minervalis


On 6/12/06, dicconf <dicconf@...> wrote:
>
>
> Yare! The same message has been showing up on the CAW and Pagan Spirit
> Gathering email lists. Looks like one of those viruses that grabs
> people's address books and retransmits itself hither and yond.
>
> -- Publius Livius Triarius
>
>
>




--
Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis

"Leve fit, quod bene fertur, onus."
(The burden which is borne well becomes light) - Ovid

My Yahoo page
http://360.yahoo.com/minervalis_barnowl


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44383 From: Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Salvete,

I hope my response wasn't inappropriate - It's just that I've heard of
various gatherings and I'm anxious to meet other Nova Romans!

Valete,
F. Martiana

On 6/12/06, Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis <minervalis@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Modianus,
>
> I've never been to one and I'd like to go, but I'm not sure when or where
> it will be.
>
> Vale,
> F. Martiana
>
>
> On 6/12/06, David Kling (Modianus) <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
> >
> > Are you going to Pagan Spirit Gathering?
> >
> > Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
> >
> > On 6/12/06, dicconf <dicconf@... <dicconf%40radix.net>> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Yare! The same message has been showing up on the CAW and Pagan Spirit
> > > Gathering email lists. Looks like one of those viruses that grabs
> > > people's address books and retransmits itself hither and yond.
> > >
> > > -- Publius Livius Triarius
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis
>
> "Leve fit, quod bene fertur, onus."
> (The burden which is borne well becomes light) - Ovid
>
> My Yahoo page
> http://360.yahoo.com/minervalis_barnowl
>



--
Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis

"Leve fit, quod bene fertur, onus."
(The burden which is borne well becomes light) - Ovid

My Yahoo page
http://360.yahoo.com/minervalis_barnowl


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44384 From: antistoicus Date: 2006-06-12
Subject: Re: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
Kristoffer From <from@...> wrote:

> antistoicus wrote:
> > How?
>
> Salve,
>
> In your e-mail program, check under "Preferences"
> for something along the lines of "Enable javascript
> in e-mails" and deselect that option. It's probably
> under a group of preferences called "Advanced" or similar.
> Presto! No more problems with this particular brand of "virii".


The problem is, Yahoo's mail program has no such option.
(I'm posting from yahoo.com).


Oh, well.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44385 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
> Salve, Q. Suetoni Pauline, et salvete, omnes bonae voluntatis!
>
>
>
> Salvi Appi Galeri,
>
> Sigh, you know Iam no fan of Sharia law but I must confess that there
> are some days like today where I'd like to see some of these malicious
> hackers brought before such a court and have their damn fingers
> amputated,
>
> ATS: Ah, but the Sharia is not so merciful, or so my Muslim friends
> informed me when I lived in an international dormitory. Off goes the right
> hand...all of it, not just the fingers, for the first offense of theft, and
> off goes the left foot for the second offense of theft, and off goes the left
> hand for the third offense. Some other offenses produce hundreds of lashes,
> which I don¹t know how anyone could survive. And then there are the
> beheadings. And the stonings. Lovely, modern system.
>
> encouraging others like them to think a good 10x before
> pulling these stunts. Excuse my evil little thoughts but anyway I hope
> you are able to resolve your problem that is now interfering with your
> business with Nova Roma.
>
> ATS: As you say, it might be a good deterrent, particularly when they
> hold these punishments in the local soccer stadium. VERY entertaining, but
> not for normal folk in the evil West.
>
> Regards,
>
> QSP
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Robert" <centorious@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Valete all.These messages about the new site have a hijacker
> within.It
>> > took control of my e-mail send function, and began to spread its
>> > message to all on my list before I ran a search.I was able to stop
> it
>> > from delivering to more sites, but it still attempts to send without
>> > its intended result.Now my box is filled with failure to send
>> > notices.Just opening the message will do it.Valete,Appius Galerius
>> > Aurelianus,Semper Fidelis!
>> >
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44386 From: dicconf Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, pompeia_minucia_tiberia wrote:

> This link contains a political science perspective of the
> characteristics of Fascism, plus other interesting elements...and it
> applies, it would seem, to both 'good' fascists and 'bad'
> fascists :)

There aren't any "good" Fascists. There are bad Fascists and worse
Fascists and demonaical Fascists.

-- P. Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44387 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
A. Apollonius Ap. Galerio omnibusque sal.

Scripsisti:

> We have had another person to join us in provisional citizenship. His name is Decimus Equitas Severes aka Brian Philips. So far I have been the only one on this board to welcome him into our Republic. Why is this? <

I didn't see any message announcing this person's arrival, or I would have included him in my welcomes.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44388 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Pagan Spirit Gathering's registration closed out on the 12th. Its located
in Southern Ohio and this year there are supposed to be about 800 Pagans in
attendance. Should be a good event. There are other, typically, smaller
events in the area as well.

Vale;

Modianus

On 6/12/06, Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis <Minervalis@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Modianus,
>
> I've never been to one and I'd like to go, but I'm not sure when or where
> it
> will be.
>
> Vale,
> F. Martiana
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44389 From: Richard Behnen Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Roman Outfits
I don't know about sets, however most of the idoms can be found at www.lawrensnest.com and www.deepeeka.com.

"Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote: Salvete omnes,

I have been planning to purchase some Roman outfits but alas the
quest is quite frustrating.

I would like to buy complete outfits in one set; for example a
complete legionaires outfit all together with the tunic, lorca,
belt, helmet, sandals, sword, scabbard and all in one sort of
package put together by somone who knows what he or she is doing
since it is easy to forget certain items and annoying to hunt
through list after list as well as the costs of shipping 20 or more
things scattered at different sites.

I do not usually buy china and pottery either as merchants like
selling items piece by piece. Give it all from plates to goblets in
a dinner set for 6 in one package or I don't bother buying.

Anyway if any citizens would have information on where to buy Roman
outfits in sets, I would sure appreciate if you let me know where.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44390 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Roman Outfits
Salve Cato,

gequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> writes:

> On a similiar note: is it appropriate for *any* Roman citizen to wear
> the kit of a Roman soldier?

Recall that only Roman citizens could serve in the legions. Non-citizens
served in the auxilia. So of course it's appropriate for Roman citizens to
wear legionary arms and armor.

> In other words, can I supplement my toga with military dress?

I'd recommend against wearing both at the same time. The Praetorian Guard did
that during the Principate, but it's a custom I'd rather not see us emulating.
But if you're going to participate in a military themed event, then legionary
kit would be entirely appropriate. (I caution you that it's also costly. A
good helmet alone will set you back around $500.)

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44391 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Multis .. - Piso's resignation
A. Apollonius P. Memmio C. Cassio omnibusque sal.

P. Memmi amice, you say that the difference between Nova Roma and Portugal "is that you can enter and quit Nova Roma". I cannot see the difference. I can enter and leave Portugal. I have done it several times, to visit my relatives there. I could, if I wished, go to live there permanently, and perhaps eventually become a citizen of that country. If I had been born a citizen of that country, I could leave it and live somewhere else. If C. Cassius is unwilling to be a member of a community which contains a fascist, he is free to leave that community, whether it be Portgual or Nova Roma. The only difference is that it is easier and less expensive to leave Nova Roma. Well, if that is the difference then what does it say about Cassius' high principles - that he is so upright that he is not prepared to be a member of the same community as a fascist, unless it actually costs him money and effort to leave? I don't think he would be keen to take up such a position.

C. Cassi, you say that you are happy to live in Portugal because the fascists are the smallest extremist minority. That is very sensible. It is also true that the fascists are the smallest extremist minority in Nova Roma. The presence of extremists in any large group is almost inevitable. Being a member of Nova Roma no more makes you a supporter or tolerator of fascism than being a resident of Portugal does. You cannot be blamed for the existence of fascists in either place, and no one would expect you to leave simply because they are there. So I hope you will take a more realistic view and remain here.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44392 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
antistoicus wrote:
> The problem is, Yahoo's mail program has no
> such option. (I'm posting from yahoo.com).

Salve,

Consider switching to GMail, it's 2GB+ of storage area and I've got a
lot of invites standing by if you want one.

Alternatively, are you using Microsoft Internet Exploder? It's quite
possible that switching to Firefox would solve this problem as well as
multiple others you aren't as of yet familiar with. In any case, it's
always a good idea to be using the latest version of a browser.

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44393 From: flavius leviticus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Salve,I once heard a story where Gorbachev was meetimg with Reagan.A newsman said to Gorbachev that in our country(USA)any group can form in front of the White House and shout, Down With Reagan,is this possible in the USSR?Gorbechev's answer was "but of course any group may form in Red Square in front of the Kremlin and shout,Down With Reagan.Vale,Appius Galerius Aurelianus.

"P. Dominus Antonius" <marsvigilia@...> wrote: So is there free speech or not within Nova Roma?
Does NR have American style political free speech where anything goes?
Does NR have European style political free speech where anything goes unless
it's offensive?
Does NR have Leninist style political free speech where anything goes but
the gov't gets to shoot you?
--
>|P. Dominus Antonius|<
Tony Dah m

Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius
Islam religio pacis, nex omnibus dissentint.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44394 From: flavius leviticus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Salve Gnaeus Equitius Marinus,Once again I find myself agreeing with you.I wonder when we are finished hunting down Nazis and Fascists who will we focus on next?Communists,Socialist,Libertarians,Greens?Or perhaps we will turn on those of different faiths,Catholics,Muslims,Jews. Methodists,Odinists,Wiccans etc. etc. etc..
Where does the witchhunt end ,and the flame wars that seem to be fanned by some who wish to discriminate on everyone, but themselves.Oh I almost forgot ,those with suspicious e-mail names.If a citizen abides by all the rules, and moral vitues and is not spreading political propaganda for their own personal belief system within our Republic ,what buisness is it of any other citizen?I am sure that Roma Antigua had many politicl groups and tolerated other faiths.When will an official source based on a constitutional basis end this continuing controversy in the name of peace?
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote: Salve Publi Antoni,

P. Dominus Antonius wrote:
> So is there free speech or not within Nova Roma?

There is.

> Does NR have American style political free speech where anything goes?
> Does NR have European style political free speech where anything goes unless
> it's offensive?

Nova Roma is incorporated both in the United States and the European
Union. As such we have to be mindful of the laws under which we are
incorporated.

Vale,

-- Marinus




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44395 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Id. Iun.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est Idibus Iuniis; haec dies nefastus publicus est.

"On the Ides a temple was dedicated to Unconquered Jove.
Now I must tell of the lesser Quinquatrus.
Help my efforts, yellow-haired Minerva.
`Why does the flautist wander widely through the City?
Why the masks? Why the long robes?' So I spoke,
And so Tritonia, laying down her spear, answered me.
(Would I could relay the learned goddess' very words!):
`Flautists were much employed in your fathers' days,
And they were always held in high honour.
The flute was played in shrines, and at the games,
And it was played at mournful funerals too:
The effort was sweetened by reward. But a time came
That suddenly ended the practice of that pleasant art.
The aedile ordered there should be no more than ten
Musicians accompanying funeral processions.
The flute-players went into exile at Tibur.
Once Tibur itself was a place of exile!
The hollow flute was missed in the theatre, at the altars:
No dirge accompanied the funeral bier.
There was one who had been a slave, at Tibur,
But had long been freed, worthy of any rank.
He prepared a rural banquet and invited the tuneful
Throng: they gathered to the festive table.
It was night: their minds and vision were thick with wine,
When a messenger arrived with a concocted tale,
Saying to the freedman: "Dissolve the feast, quickly!
See, here's your old master coming with his rod."
The guests rapidly stirred their limbs, reeling about
With strong wine, staggering on shaky legs.
But the master cried: "Away with you!" and packed
The laggards into a wagon lined with rushes.
The hour, the motion, and the wine, brought on sleep,
And the drunken crowd dreamed they were off to Tibur.
Now they re-entered Rome through the Esquiline,
And at dawn the cart stood in the middle of the Forum.
To deceive the Senate as to their class and number,
Plautius ordered their faces covered with masks:
And introduced others, wearing long garments,
So that female flautists could be added to the crew:
And their return best hidden, in case they were censured
For coming back contrary to their guilds' orders.
The ruse succeeded, and they're allowed their new costume,
On the Ides, singing merry words to the ancient tunes.'
When she'd instructed me, I said: `It only remains
For me to learn why the day's called the Quinquatrus.'
She replied: `There's my festival of that name in March,
And that guild is one of my creations.
I first produced the music of the long flute,
By piercing boxwood with spaced holes.
The music pleased: but I saw the swollen cheeks
Of my virginal face reflected in the water.
I said: " I don't value my art that highly, away
My flute": and threw it to fall on the turf by the river.
Marsyas the satyr found it, and marvelled at first
Not knowing its use: but found his breath produced a note:
And worked it now by breathing now by fingering.
He soon boasted of his skill among the nymphs:
And challenged Phoebus: trounced by Phoebus he was hanged:
And his skin was flayed from his limbs.
I'm the true creator and inventor of this music.
That's why the guild keeps my holy days.'" - Ovid, Fasti VI

Today is held in honor of Iuppiter Invictus, the most glorious of the
members of the Roman pantheon. It is also celebrated as the
Quinquatrus minusculae or Quinquatrus minores, the "lesser
Quinquatrus", in honor of Minerva, the goddess of wisdom. The Greeks
held today as Minerva's birthday.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44396 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Salvete [welcome]
---Salve Livius et Salvete Omnes:

Precisely my point...there aren't any 'good' fascists....the reasons
for the quotes and smiley in my post...although there are people
(usually fascists) quite delighted to claim that there are.

valete
Pompeia



In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, dicconf <dicconf@...> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, pompeia_minucia_tiberia wrote:
>
> > This link contains a political science perspective of the
> > characteristics of Fascism, plus other interesting
elements...and it
> > applies, it would seem, to both 'good' fascists and 'bad'
> > fascists :)
>
> There aren't any "good" Fascists. There are bad Fascists and
worse
> Fascists and demonaical Fascists.
>
> -- P. Livius Triarius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44397 From: flavius leviticus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Salve Gnaeus Equitius Marinus,Once again I find myself agreeing with you.I wonder when we are finished hunting down Nazis and Fascists who will we focus on next?Communists,Socialist,Libertarians,Greens?Or perhaps we will turn on those of different faiths,Catholics,Muslims,Jews. Methodists,Odinists,Wiccans etc. etc. etc..
Where does the witchhunt end ,and the flame wars that seem to be fanned by some who wish to discriminate on everyone, but themselves.Oh I almost forgot ,those with suspicious e-mail names.If a citizen abides by all the rules, and moral vitues and is not spreading political propaganda for their own personal belief system within our Republic ,what buisness is it of any other citizen?I am sure that Roma Antigua had many politicl groups and tolerated other faiths.When will an official source based on a constitutional basis end this continuing controversy in the name of peace?
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote: Salve Publi Antoni,

P. Dominus Antonius wrote:
> So is there free speech or not within Nova Roma?

There is.

> Does NR have American style political free speech where anything goes?
> Does NR have European style political free speech where anything goes unless
> it's offensive?

Nova Roma is incorporated both in the United States and the European
Union. As such we have to be mindful of the laws under which we are
incorporated.

Vale,

-- Marinus




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44398 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
A. Apollonius Faustae Martianae omnibusque sal.

> I hope my response wasn't inappropriate - It's just that I've heard of
various gatherings and I'm anxious to meet other Nova Romans! <

Come to the Conventus at Hadrian's Wall in August! :)

Details here:

http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/V_Conventus_Novae_Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44399 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Or if you cannot afford the Conventus you can attend Elysium Gathering and
meet with other Nova Romans and other programming.

http://www.three-roads.org/elysium.html

Valete:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 6/13/06, A. Apollonius Cordus <a_apollonius_cordus@...> wrote:
>
> A. Apollonius Faustae Martianae omnibusque sal.
>
>
> > I hope my response wasn't inappropriate - It's just that I've heard of
> various gatherings and I'm anxious to meet other Nova Romans! <
>
> Come to the Conventus at Hadrian's Wall in August! :)
>
> Details here:
>
> http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/V_Conventus_Novae_Romae
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44400 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
A. Apollonius P. Dominio omnibusque sal.

> So is there free speech or not within Nova Roma?
Does NR have American style political free speech where anything goes?
Does NR have European style political free speech where anything goes unless
it's offensive?
Does NR have Leninist style political free speech where anything goes but
the gov't gets to shoot you? <

First, it's important to remember the difference between legal prohibition and social pressure. A lot of the time when people in this forum complain that there's no free speech or they're being censored, what has really happened is this:

A: I think XYZ
B: That's stupid, shut up.
A: Hey, what happened to free speech?

Obviously, people telling each other to shut up is not a restriction on freedom of speech; indeed, it's an example of freedom of speech: you're free to say whatever you like, I'm free to tell you not to say that. What sometimes confuses people is that occasionally the person telling you to shut up happens to be a magistrate or a senator. That's not really surprising given the number of magistrates and senatores knocking around the forum. But the fact that it's a figure of authority telling you to shut up doesn't mean you are being oppressed by the state. A consul telling you to shut up is usually much the same as me telling you to shut up. Only if a consul says "shut up or I'll impose a summary fine on you" are we talking about restrictions on freedom of speech.

Now, when it comes to actual legal restrictions, there are a few. This forum is a public one and the praetores have a duty to maintain public order. They have a certain amount of discretion as to how and when they do so. There are two of them, so if one tries to impose unreasonable limits on free speech the other can stop him doing so. Also they can be overruled by the consules if necessary. Moreover they can, after their term of office has ended, be taken to court by any citizen who has evidence that they have abused their powers.

The harshest sanction the praetores can impose in practice is to place a disruptive person on moderated status for a set period. Though no currently written law says so, ancient law suggests that they can also impose summary punishments such as fines, corporal punishment, and even execution. The power to impose corporal punishment and execution is in reality an illusion, because those punishments have since Scipionic times been subject to provocatio (i.e. the person who is threatened with that punishment can appeal to the people, and the magistrate cannot then impose the punishment unless, after a trial, the comitia votes to allow him to do so; and even then the defendant is allowed to go into voluntary exile). Under our lex constitutiva in fact any punishment is subject to provocatio, including fines and probably even moderation.

In addition to the discretionary powers of the praetores to maintain public order, there are certain types of speech which can result in criminal liability. These include making a false and defamatory statement about another person (lex Salicia poenalis XIV), deliberately providing false information to another person in such a way as to hinder that person in the performance of his legal duties or in such as way as to surrender property or rights or to do some other act harmful to himself (XVI), inciting in another person hatred, despite or enmity towards a person or group on the basis of the religious beliefs or practices of that person or group (XVIII), and doing any overt act by a citizen which a reasonable person would conclude to be damaging or defamatory to the republic, its religio, or its institutions unless authorized to do so (XXI - N.B. this last offence explicitly does not include "any legislative proposal or peaceful attempt to reform the State by means of
legislation"). Anyone found by a court to have done one of these things (subject to the usual defences &c.) could face a penalty up to loss of citizenship.

The censores have the power to place a nota against the name of any person they consider to have acted immorally. They have a wide discretion in this area, and their decisions are not subject to appeal. However, any future censores may remove the nota. A nota removes certain public rights from the person concerned.

That, I think, is more or less a full list of restrictions on freedom of speech here. As you will see, it essentially means that the state has the power to limit that freedom in the interests of public order and the protection of the rights of others, which is pretty standard in all civilized societies.

P.S. Your description of freedom of speech in Europe is a grotesque caricature. I warmly invite you to come to the Conventus in Britannia in August, where you can, if you like, test this out for yourself by saying many offensive things without getting even slightly arrested. :)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44401 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
---Pompeia Minucia Strabo Consul Quiritibus S.P.D.



Further to the interesting dialogues below of Dominius et Apollonius
Cordus, I thought I would bring something forth for clarification.
Below is copied the 'free speech' rights of citizens according to
our constitution (after my blathering paragraph!)

The key word here, I think is 'citizen'. A citizen is entitled to
these rights, except where in the view of the Praetors their speech
meets an issue with 'imminent and clear danger' to the republic. A
noncitizen does not hold these rights...they are 'citizen' rights.
Our Praetors are generally pretty generous overall to afford the
general public and certainly probational citizens the 'privilege' of
speaking and opining in our forum, but when it comes down to brass
tax, if the Praetors felt there was a reason they should not hold
such carte blanc privileges or even subscription, due to abuse, or
potential disruption, he could send said noncitizen off the list and
there is no recourse...no provacatio, no apellatio...as this person
again, is not a citizen and therefore cannot claim these rights of
appeal.
In addition, we have to consider Yahoo Terms of Service in any
decisions, citizen or noncitizen...but a noncitizen who is violating
our definitions of 'free speech' doesn't have much leg to stand on.

****Here is the pertinent constitutional language****

The right to participate in all public fora and discussions, and the
right to reasonably expect such fora to be supported by the State.
Such communications, regardless of their content, may not be
restricted by the State, except where they represent an imminent and
clear danger to the Republic. Such officially sponsored fora may be
expected to be reasonably moderated in the interests of maintaining
order and civility;

Valete




In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@...> wrote:
>
> A. Apollonius P. Dominio omnibusque sal.
>
> > So is there free speech or not within Nova Roma?
> Does NR have American style political free speech where anything
goes?
> Does NR have European style political free speech where anything
goes unless
> it's offensive?
> Does NR have Leninist style political free speech where anything
goes but
> the gov't gets to shoot you? <
>
> First, it's important to remember the difference between legal
prohibition and social pressure. A lot of the time when people in
this forum complain that there's no free speech or they're being
censored, what has really happened is this:
>
> A: I think XYZ
> B: That's stupid, shut up.
> A: Hey, what happened to free speech?
>
> Obviously, people telling each other to shut up is not a
restriction on freedom of speech; indeed, it's an example of freedom
of speech: you're free to say whatever you like, I'm free to tell
you not to say that. What sometimes confuses people is that
occasionally the person telling you to shut up happens to be a
magistrate or a senator. That's not really surprising given the
number of magistrates and senatores knocking around the forum. But
the fact that it's a figure of authority telling you to shut up
doesn't mean you are being oppressed by the state. A consul telling
you to shut up is usually much the same as me telling you to shut
up. Only if a consul says "shut up or I'll impose a summary fine on
you" are we talking about restrictions on freedom of speech.
>
> Now, when it comes to actual legal restrictions, there are a few.
This forum is a public one and the praetores have a duty to maintain
public order. They have a certain amount of discretion as to how and
when they do so. There are two of them, so if one tries to impose
unreasonable limits on free speech the other can stop him doing so.
Also they can be overruled by the consules if necessary. Moreover
they can, after their term of office has ended, be taken to court by
any citizen who has evidence that they have abused their powers.
>
> The harshest sanction the praetores can impose in practice is to
place a disruptive person on moderated status for a set period.
Though no currently written law says so, ancient law suggests that
they can also impose summary punishments such as fines, corporal
punishment, and even execution. The power to impose corporal
punishment and execution is in reality an illusion, because those
punishments have since Scipionic times been subject to provocatio
(i.e. the person who is threatened with that punishment can appeal
to the people, and the magistrate cannot then impose the punishment
unless, after a trial, the comitia votes to allow him to do so; and
even then the defendant is allowed to go into voluntary exile).
Under our lex constitutiva in fact any punishment is subject to
provocatio, including fines and probably even moderation.
>
> In addition to the discretionary powers of the praetores to
maintain public order, there are certain types of speech which can
result in criminal liability. These include making a false and
defamatory statement about another person (lex Salicia poenalis
XIV), deliberately providing false information to another person in
such a way as to hinder that person in the performance of his legal
duties or in such as way as to surrender property or rights or to do
some other act harmful to himself (XVI), inciting in another person
hatred, despite or enmity towards a person or group on the basis of
the religious beliefs or practices of that person or group (XVIII),
and doing any overt act by a citizen which a reasonable person would
conclude to be damaging or defamatory to the republic, its religio,
or its institutions unless authorized to do so (XXI - N.B. this last
offence explicitly does not include "any legislative proposal or
peaceful attempt to reform the State by means of
> legislation"). Anyone found by a court to have done one of these
things (subject to the usual defences &c.) could face a penalty up
to loss of citizenship.
>
> The censores have the power to place a nota against the name of
any person they consider to have acted immorally. They have a wide
discretion in this area, and their decisions are not subject to
appeal. However, any future censores may remove the nota. A nota
removes certain public rights from the person concerned.
>
> That, I think, is more or less a full list of restrictions on
freedom of speech here. As you will see, it essentially means that
the state has the power to limit that freedom in the interests of
public order and the protection of the rights of others, which is
pretty standard in all civilized societies.
>
> P.S. Your description of freedom of speech in Europe is a
grotesque caricature. I warmly invite you to come to the Conventus
in Britannia in August, where you can, if you like, test this out
for yourself by saying many offensive things without getting even
slightly arrested. :)
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44402 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Vox Romana podcast
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

[Apologies for posting to multiple lists.]

If you have any interesting Roman-type news, we would love to include it in the next broadcast of Vox Romana (see http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/ for details).

A provincial meeting?

A new project?

A local archaeological discovery?

A religious celebration?

Tell us about it, and it could be included in the round-up of news in the next broadcast.

Just write to me: a_apollonius_cordus @ yahoo . co . uk
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44403 From: Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Salve Modianus,

It sounds like it'll be great! Since I live in California it would be a long
way to go, but it's not entirely impossible. Maybe my husband and I will be
able to attend in the not-to-distant future. :-)

Vale,
F. Martiana


On 6/12/06, David Kling (Modianus) <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Pagan Spirit Gathering's registration closed out on the 12th. Its
> located
> in Southern Ohio and this year there are supposed to be about 800 Pagans
> in
> attendance. Should be a good event. There are other, typically, smaller
> events in the area as well.
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
>
> On 6/12/06, Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis <Minervalis@...<Minervalis%40gmail.com>
> >
>
> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Modianus,
> >
> > I've never been to one and I'd like to go, but I'm not sure when or
> where
> > it
> > will be.
> >
> > Vale,
> > F. Martiana
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> <http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJxcjBldjU5BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNjAwMzEzNzEyBG1zZ0lkAzQ0Mzg4BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3RpbWUDMTE1MDE5Mjc2MA--;_ylg=1/SIG=12gna7e15/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post%3fact=reply%26messageNum=44388><http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJkc3YxNHZvBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNjAwMzEzNzEyBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2dmcARzdGltZQMxMTUwMTkyNzYw;_ylg=1/SIG=10skg51ah/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com>
> <http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJkc2NydTViBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNjAwMzEzNzEyBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2hwZgRzdGltZQMxMTUwMTkyNzYw;_ylg=1/SIG=11cha5fmj/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>
> .
>
>
>



--
Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis

"Leve fit, quod bene fertur, onus."
(The burden which is borne well becomes light) - Ovid

My Yahoo page
http://360.yahoo.com/minervalis_barnowl


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44404 From: Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Salve Cordus,

The Conventus sounds wonderful, but I'm afraid it's beyond my meager budget.
:-( However, we have a lottery here in California, so maybe I'll get lucky
one day! I really hope I'll be able to attend some day, or at least see
Hadrian's Wall in person, instead of just on TV.

Vale,
F. Martiana


On 6/13/06, A. Apollonius Cordus <a_apollonius_cordus@...> wrote:
>
> A. Apollonius Faustae Martianae omnibusque sal.
>
>
> > I hope my response wasn't inappropriate - It's just that I've heard of
> various gatherings and I'm anxious to meet other Nova Romans! <
>
> Come to the Conventus at Hadrian's Wall in August! :)
>
> Details here:
>
> http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/V_Conventus_Novae_Romae
>
>
>



--
Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis

"Leve fit, quod bene fertur, onus."
(The burden which is borne well becomes light) - Ovid

My Yahoo page
http://360.yahoo.com/minervalis_barnowl


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44405 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Ave Apollonius,

I had written more in a previous e-mail:

In Europe and Canada MOST political speech is tolerated, this generally
excludes Nazi ideology, racism, and "religionism." In some places you can
be fined in other places jailed. If you don't believe me, try goose
stepping while doing the straight arm salute and singing Deutchland Uberalis
along the Champs Elysees or in front of the Bundestag.

I think that this is a fuller explanation of my understanding of free speech
as it exists in Europe. Is England a part of Europe?

I appreciate your invitation, but I try to limit how many offensive things I
say each year, and I may be over my quota for 2759.
--
>|P. Dominus Antonius|<
Tony Dah m

Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius
Islam religio pacis, nex omnibus dissentint.


On 6/13/06, A. Apollonius Cordus <a_apollonius_cordus@...> wrote:
P.S. Your description of freedom of speech in Europe is a grotesque
caricature. I warmly invite you to come to the Conventus in Britannia in
August, where you can, if you like, test this out for yourself by saying
many offensive things without getting even slightly arrested. :)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44406 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
OK. I still don't know. Being "mindful" is great. But let us get some
real explicit details rather than vague generalities.

For example can a NR citizen do the following:
1. Deny the Holocaust on a NR main list or subsidiary list.
2. Deny the Holocaust on a Non-NR list but where they are known as an NR
citizen.
3. Deny the Holocaust on a Non-NR list but where they are not-known as an
NR citizen but another NR citizen discovers them and reports to the NR
authorities.
4. Sing "It's Spring Time for Hitler and Germany".in a public park (in the
US) while wearing a NR T-shirt.
5. Make angry generalities against Christians .
6. Make angry generalities against Muslims.
7. Make angry generalities against Jews.
8. Make angry generalities against Pagans.

I am used to living in a society where I can say anything my wife lets me
say. I just need to know the ground rules within NR.
--
>|P. Dominus Antonius|<
Tony Dah m

Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius
Islam religio pacis, nex omnibus dissentint.


P. Dominus Antonius wrote:
>> Does NR have American style political free speech where anything goes?
>> Does NR have European style political free speech where anything goes
unless
>> it's offensive?

On 6/12/06, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
>> Nova Roma is incorporated both in the United States and the European
>> Union. As such we have to be mindful of the laws under which we are
>> incorporated.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44407 From: Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
Salve Modianus,

I look forward to doing that in the future!

Vale,
F. Martiana

On 6/13/06, David Kling (Modianus) <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Or if you cannot afford the Conventus you can attend Elysium Gathering
> and
> meet with other Nova Romans and other programming.
>
> http://www.three-roads.org/elysium.html
>
> Valete:
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
>
> On 6/13/06, A. Apollonius Cordus <a_apollonius_cordus@...<a_apollonius_cordus%40yahoo.co.uk>>
> wrote:
> >
> > A. Apollonius Faustae Martianae omnibusque sal.
> >
> >
> > > I hope my response wasn't inappropriate - It's just that I've heard of
> > various gatherings and I'm anxious to meet other Nova Romans! <
> >
> > Come to the Conventus at Hadrian's Wall in August! :)
> >
> > Details here:
> >
> > http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/V_Conventus_Novae_Romae
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> <http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJxbGlxMmZtBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNjAwMzEzNzEyBG1zZ0lkAzQ0Mzk5BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3RpbWUDMTE1MDIxNTQ1MA--;_ylg=1/SIG=12gaf37v3/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post%3fact=reply%26messageNum=44399><http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJkb3NqYnZjBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNjAwMzEzNzEyBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2dmcARzdGltZQMxMTUwMjE1NDUw;_ylg=1/SIG=10skg51ah/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com>
> <http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJkbTlqNmxyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNjAwMzEzNzEyBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2hwZgRzdGltZQMxMTUwMjE1NDUw;_ylg=1/SIG=11cha5fmj/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma>
> .
>
>
>



--
Fausta Martiana Gangalia Minervalis

"Leve fit, quod bene fertur, onus."
(The burden which is borne well becomes light) - Ovid

My Yahoo page
http://360.yahoo.com/minervalis_barnowl


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44408 From: CN•EQVIT•MARINVS (Gnaeus Equitius Mari Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Salve Antoni,

"P. Dominus Antonius" <marsvigilia@...> writes:

Incidentally, I don't find any citizen with your quasi-Roman name or your
e-mail address in the database. So I'm a bit curious about why you're asking
these questions. Are you even a citizen?

> For example can a NR citizen do the following:

I'm going to interpret your question to mean, "can a NR citizen do this
without risk of prosecution or Censorial nota."

> 1. Deny the Holocaust on a NR main list or subsidiary list.

No.

> 2. Deny the Holocaust on a Non-NR list but where they are known as an NR
> citizen.

No.

> 3. Deny the Holocaust on a Non-NR list but where they are not-known as an
> NR citizen but another NR citizen discovers them and reports to the NR
> authorities.

Probably. Though charges still might be brought, my guess is that the
praetores would dismiss them. On the other hand it might still draw a
censorial nota.

> 4. Sing "It's Spring Time for Hitler and Germany".in a public park (in the
> US) while wearing a NR T-shirt.

That shouldn't be a problem. It's widely known to be a spoof.

> 5. Make angry generalities against Christians.

No.

> 6. Make angry generalities against Muslims.

No.

> 7. Make angry generalities against Jews.

No.

> 8. Make angry generalities against Pagans.

No.

> I am used to living in a society where I can say anything my wife lets me
> say. I just need to know the ground rules within NR.

The first thing for you to understand about Nova Roma is that we have two
censors who are tasked with upholding the public morality. If, in our
judgement, you (or anyone else) do something that offends against public
morality, we will admonish you and quite possibly issue a censorial nota
against you.

Beyond that, we have laws which provide penalties for slander, libel, and the
making of false statements. Violations of those laws are prosecuted by the
praetors.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44409 From: P.Memmius Albucius Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Piso's resignation - on citizenship
P. Memmius Albucius Corde omnibusque s.d.

--- "A. Apollonius Cordus" wrote:

>(..) I can enter and leave Portugal. I have done it several times,
>to visit my relatives there. I could, if I wished, go to live there
>permanently, and perhaps eventually become a citizen of that
>country. If I had been born a citizen of that country, I could leave
>it and live somewhere else.

Amice, I think that you confound two things : the place where you are
physically and the juridical relation between a human being and a
state (= the citizenship). Naturally, you can leave U.K. to
sail/fly/drive/ride/walk to Portugal. But you still remain a "subject
of U.K. law" (= a citizen of the U.K.).
You may naturally become a citizen of Portugal, but if and only if
Portugal accepts to grant you its citizenship. The difference with
the relation with an NGO like NR is that in our macronational states,
we cannot freely choose to refuse to be linked with the community
(the citizenship).


>(..)The presence of extremists in any large group is almost
inevitable.(..)

Objectively, this argument sounds good. It may offer us a good base
to begin to draw learnings from this "fascist affair".
Yes, we could say : "the more we are, the more we mathematically have
among us different kinds of people, included extremists and
fundamentalists."
But we cannot stay at this stage of the reasoning, because you could
be answered : "and if we do not want to (increase largely our
population, count extr. and fund. among us) ?".
Here comes again the question of Nova Roma's nature, between its
juridical status (a NGO) and what it hopes to be : a nation, a state,
etc..

That is not an easy question.

First because I am not sure that our res publica does give potential
applicants clear guidelines on what is the "philosophy" (the social
contract)of our community. I think on this point that we should all
make the effort, with our patres patriae, to actualise the
Declaration of NR.
I may hear your voice, amice... it tells : "we all share the feeling
to "be romans"". Yes, but there seems to be a wide range of "how to
be a roman" ways, included the more brutal ones...

Second, precisely NR is not - according macronational current law -
considered as a state, but as a NGO. And the national laws on NGO all
join in giving members the free right to enter and quit them, and
define the scope of the common project. As such, we must recognize
here that Cassius's question is founded. Each of us may ask her/him-
self, one day : "do the reasons why I sign up for this project are
still accurate ?" and, if not, to think about a withdrawal.

Last, on the matter, the question asked by Piso and some others - I
think on Consul Modianus - seems to be highly honourable, and should
drive us to a real debate on the question.

Vale(-te),


P. Memmius Albucius
Legatus Lugdunensis Galliae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44410 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Vox Romana podcast ( and Photos !!! )
SALVE ET SALVETE !

One month ago, I was with Iulius Probus in a trip to the Roman Fortress from Drobeta, The Iron Gates Museum and Thermae Herculi.
It was a fascinating trip. We decide to organize a Provincial trip to these wonderful historical areas and places.
In this weekend Provincia Dacia cives will travel. To Drobeta and Thermae Herculi.

I decide to post this message public. To give to my words an image. Here are new links from our events :

1. Limes Alutanus :
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/arutela.htm

2. Iron Gates Museum :
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/drobeta.htm

3. Thermae Herculi ad Mediam :
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/thermae.htm

And all the Dacia events at :
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/prodacia.htm

More next week. And a material for VoxRomana.

VALE ET VALETE,
IVL SABINVS



"A. Apollonius Cordus" <a_apollonius_cordus@...> wrote:
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

[Apologies for posting to multiple lists.]

If you have any interesting Roman-type news, we would love to include it in the next broadcast of Vox Romana (see http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/ for details).

A provincial meeting?

A new project?

A local archaeological discovery?

A religious celebration?

Tell us about it, and it could be included in the round-up of news in the next broadcast.

Just write to me: a_apollonius_cordus @ yahoo . co . uk







NOVA ROMANI !
Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support page to your websites.
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm

"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44411 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Piso's resignation - on citizenship
SALVE MEMMI ALBUCI !

"P.Memmius Albucius" <albucius_aoe@...> wrote: I may hear your voice, amice... it tells : "we all share the feeling
to "be romans"". Yes, but there seems to be a wide range of "how to
be a roman" ways, included the more brutal ones...>>>

My friend ! I realy understand the Cordus voice. And indeed to " be roman " is a feeling. Very hard to describe with simple words.
These wide range of " how to be a roman " represent only private options. With all repercussions. The brutal ones comes only from ignorance. Who march on this way, for me, doesn't exist. Because I belive only in one way : the Roman Way as it is described by Roman Virtues. Who will understand, will be able to understand all.
VALE,
IVL SABINVS




My,_._,___






NOVA ROMANI !
Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support page to your websites.
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm

"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44412 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
C. Equitius Cato A. Apollonio Cordo Gn. Equitio Marino P. Domino
Antonio quiritibusque S.P.D.

Salvete omnes.

Well, I did a little digging into what the ancient Romans might have
thought of our concept of "freedom of speech" and was a little (maybe
more than a little) surprised by what I found:

As we understand, ancient Roman society was strongly organized around
the client/patron system. Patronage was recognized in civil law,
especially in relation to freed men, who were ipso facto clients of
their ex-masters. Patronage operated unofficially in lawsuits,
elections, services, etc. Legal regulations and customs affecting
freedom of speech in the Roman society of the Republic have to be
interpreted against the back- ground of this complex net of relations.
According to the most plausible interpretation, one of the laws of the
Twelve Tables (fifth Century B.C.) punished slander by death.
Aristocrats were likely to derive most advantage from such a provision
which can be paralleled in other societies (Anglo-Saxons punished
slander by the excision of the tongue). At the end of the third
century B.C., the poet Naevius seems to have been prosecuted in
accordance with this law when he attacked the powerful Metelli in a
theatrical performance (the details are extremely obscure). Later this
law fell into desuetude, and slander was prosecuted as iniuria - which
was stretched to cover attacks in theaters against individuals. At
least since the time of Augustus (if not of Sulla) offensive words
against persons in authority came under the law of maiestas: here
again details are by no means clear. Foreign philosophers and
rhetoricians were thrown out of Rome more than once in the second and
first centuries B.C. under the ordinary coercive powers of the
magistrates, who had the support of the Senate. This amounted to
implicit interference with education.

The general impression one receives for the last century of the
Republic is that in both political and intellectual life tongues moved
freely. But this was a period of crisis, and even in this period the
beneficiaries must have been a restricted privileged group. Men like
Cicero felt that there was less freedom of speech in Rome than in
Athens - and yet this admission did not imply any regret. It is
typical of Republican Rome that freedom of speech was never directly
and precisely connected with the more general notion of libertas. The
very terminology of freedom of speech, however, pointed to a
relationship between freedom in general and freedom of speech in
particular: we hear of libera lingua, oratio libera. It goes without
saying that by the first century B.C. Roman terminology was influenced
by Greek usage. Yet parrhesia (the Greek phrase which most closely
mirrors a contemporary understanding of "freedom of speech" - although
it was, naturally, limited to land-owning men) never had an exact
equivalent in Rome; when it was translated by licentia, contumacia, an
element of criticism was often implied. The general attitude seems to
have been that only persons in authority had a right to speak freely:
one senses that freedom of speech belongs to the sphere of auctoritas
just as much as to the sphere of libertas.

Valete bene,

Cato

SOURCES

Dr. Arnaldo Momigliano, "Freedom of Speech in Antiquity", J. A. O.
Larsen, "Representative Government in Greek and Roman History"
(Berkeley, 1955), L. Robinson, "Freedom of Speech in the Roman
Republic" (Baltimore, 1940), T. Bollinger, "Theatralis Licentia"
(Winterthur, 1969), T. Frank, "Naevius and Free Speech", American
Journal of Philology (1927)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44413 From: P.Memmius Albucius Date: 2006-06-13
Subject: Re: Sabinus's photos and Traiana inscriptio
P. Memmius Albucius Propraetori Sabino s.d.

Iulius sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:

(..)
> One month ago, I was with Iulius Probus in a trip to the Roman
Fortress from Drobeta, The Iron Gates Museum and Thermae Herculi.(..)
Here are new links from our events :
> 1. Limes Alutanus :
> http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/arutela.htm
> 2. Iron Gates Museum :
> http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/drobeta.htm
> 3. Thermae Herculi ad Mediam :
> http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/thermae.htm
> And all the Dacia events at :
> http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/prodacia.htm

Wonderful photos, Sabine ! It really gives us the wish to visit the
Iron Gates country.

I have been also much interested by the shots of the roman
inscriptions that you did. In order to have some sleep, I have
limited myself to one sole inscription, the 4th Drobeta one(Traian
inscription.
Here is its translation :

« The emperor Caesar Nerva Traian, son of divine Nerva, August,
Germanic, Supreme Pontiff, invested with his 4th tribunician power,
Father of the patria, consul for the fourth time, created a diversion
of the Danube in order to avoid the danger of the (existing)
cataractes and thus sicure its whole navigation. »

This inscription celebrating Traian (the Tabula Traiana ?) is very
interesting !

First because we can ask ourselves if it does not include a
*mistake* : Traian had never, at the same time, his 4th trib. Power
and his 4th consulate. His 4th tribunician power could date the
Danube deviation in year 100 a.d., more precisely before the autumn.
He was then in his *3th* consulate. And when he became consul for the
4th time, on Jan 1st 101 a.d., he has already got his *5th*
tribunician power... ! So, dear Sabine, do you know what tells the
*stone* itself ?

Second, because at this time, Traian was at the beginning of his
imperial cursus : he was simply « imperator » and not, like some
years after, honored as « imperator for the X time ». Similarly, two
years later, he will be honored with the adjective « optimus », which
will moreover be used as an agnomen from 114 a.d. on. We thus see
that Traian is not yet « optimus ».

Third, we see that our inscription does not call yet Traian as «
Dacicus » (« Dacic »). This title will be given to him by the senate
of Rome at spring 102 a.d.. So, the stone could have been written
from the 1st of Jan 100 to the autumn 101.

Fourth, because the latin expression « derivato flumine » used here
may speak of two realisations : either the Romans diverted the Danube
itself, in its whole ; or they created a diversion channel. In fact,
the good translation is the second one. Naturally, it is easier to
translate when you know how rough is the landscape there with its
high cliffs and how impossible it would have been diverting the whole
river.
The channel is known as the « Channel of Sip ». Created by the
Romans, it has been used till the 20th century to avoid the dangerous
and turmoiling waters of the many falls existing there in the Danube.

Fifth, if I remember well, this inscription has been written directly
in the stone, above a track along the river, in this place where the
Danube marks the border between Romania and Serbia. The stone has
been cut and moved several years ago at the foot of the cliff, 5 feet
above the river.

Last, we see that our roman ancestors have made huge high technical
skilled works, which have crossed the centuries. Be they honoured for
that !

Vale(-te),


P. Memmius Albucius
Legatus Lugdunensis Galliae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44414 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: Sabinus's photos and Traiana inscriptio
SALVE ET SALVETE !

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "P.Memmius Albucius"
<albucius_aoe@...> wrote:

> Wonderful photos, Sabine ! It really gives us the wish to visit
the Iron Gates country.>>>

Thank you very much. I will include the Iron Gates area in the Dacia
Conventus trips.

> I have been also much interested by the shots of the roman
> inscriptions that you did. In order to have some sleep, I have
> limited myself to one sole inscription, the 4th Drobeta one(Traian
> inscription.
> Here is its translation :
>"The emperor Caesar Nerva Traian, son of divine Nerva, August,
>Germanic, Supreme Pontiff, invested with his 4th tribunician power,
Father of the patria, consul for the fourth time, created a
diversion of the Danube in order to avoid the danger of the
(existing) cataractes and thus sicure its whole navigation."
>This inscription celebrating Traian (the Tabula Traiana ?) is very
> interesting !>>>

The inscription from Epigraphic Datenbank is :

"Imp(erator) Caesar divi Nervae f(ilius) / Nerva Traianus Aug(ustus)
Germ(anicus) / pont(ifex) max(imus) trib(unicia) pot(estate) V p
(ater) p(atriae) co(n)s(ul) IIII / ob periculum cataractarum /
derivato flumine tutam Da/nuvi navigationem fecit"


> First because we can ask ourselves if it does not include a
> *mistake* : Traian had never, at the same time, his 4th trib.
Power and his 4th consulate. His 4th tribunician power could date
the Danube deviation in year 100 a.d., more precisely before the
autumn.
> He was then in his *3th* consulate. And when he became consul for
the 4th time, on Jan 1st 101 a.d., he has already got his *5th*
> tribunician power... ! So, dear Sabine, do you know what tells the
> *stone* itself ?>>>

You have done a fine remark, amice. Your point of view is correct.
It seems is a mistake there. The inscription from Epigraphic
Datenbank, and I guess that is the correct one, said that Traian was
in his 5th trib. power and in his 4th. consulate. So the inscription
show that the Danube diversion was happened after Jan 1st 101 AD.
I don't know yet what it means that Danube diversion, because the
inscription about the Roman Path striked in stone ( Tabula Traiana )
is different :

From Epigraphic Datenbank :

"Imp(erator) Caesar divi Nervae f(ilius) / Nerva Traianus Aug(ustus)
Germ(anicus) / pontif(ex) maximus trib(unicia) pot(estate) IIII /
pater patriae co(n)s(ul) III / montibus excisi[s] anco[ni]bus /
sublat[i]s via[m r]e[fecit]"

So the ancient roman road was done/finished between 100 - 101 AD.

The question is if the Danube diversion is in conection with the
Traian Bridge construction.
There are two theories about how the Traian bridge was built by
Apolodorus :
- upon the method described by Vetruvius, and the work was done from
a boat bridge ( pontoon, a term wellknown by the militaries
engineers )
- by the Danube derivation. In the bridge area technical is possible.

How the bridge was built is still a mystery. And the time for built
was a short one.

> Second, because at this time, Traian was at the beginning of his
> imperial cursus : he was simply « imperator » and not, like some
> years after, honored as « imperator for the X time ». Similarly,
two years later, he will be honored with the adjective « optimus »,
which will moreover be used as an agnomen from 114 a.d. on. We thus
see that Traian is not yet « optimus ».>>>

I agree. Your observation is correct.
>
> Third, we see that our inscription does not call yet Traian as «
> Dacicus » (« Dacic »). This title will be given to him by the
senate of Rome at spring 102 a.d.. So, the stone could have been
written from the 1st of Jan 100 to the autumn 101.>>>

I agree, too. And the inscription about the road have been written
in 100 AD, and the inscription about the Danube diversion, in 101 AD.

> Fourth, because the latin expression « derivato flumine » used
here may speak of two realisations : either the Romans diverted the
Danube itself, in its whole ; or they created a diversion channel.
In fact, the good translation is the second one. Naturally, it is
easier to translate when you know how rough is the landscape there
with its high cliffs and how impossible it would have been diverting
the whole river.
The channel is known as the « Channel of Sip ». Created by the
Romans, it has been used till the 20th century to avoid the
dangerous and turmoiling waters of the many falls existing there in
the Danube.>>>

We can't talk about a channel at the Iron Gates created by Romans.A
road striked in rocks, yes. The Channel of Sip was inaugarated in
1896.Until then the Danube Gorge it wasn't navigable.

> Fifth, if I remember well, this inscription has been written
directly in the stone, above a track along the river, in this place
where the Danube marks the border between Romania and Serbia. The
stone has been cut and moved several years ago at the foot of the
cliff, 5 feet above the river. >>>

The Iron Gates Dam was build and, ideed, the Tabula Traiana was
moved.

> Last, we see that our roman ancestors have made huge high
technical skilled works, which have crossed the centuries. Be they
honoured for that !>>>

Their works are very well presented in the wonderful Perusianus
site, Signa Romanorum.

VALE ET VALETE,
IVL SABINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44415 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: post. Id. Iun. (a.d. XVIII Kal. Quin.)
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est postridie Idus Iunius (ante diem XVIII Quinctilis); haec
dies nefastus est.

"There follows the question as to whether rhetoric is useful. Some are
in the habit of denouncing it most violently and of shamelessly
employing the powers of oratory to accuse oratory itself. "It is
eloquence" they say "that snatches criminals from the penalties of the
law, eloquence that from time to time secures the condemnation of the
innocent and leads deliberation astray, eloquence that stirs up not
merely sedition and popular tumult, but wars beyond all expiation, and
that is most effective when it makes falsehood prevail over the
truth." The comic poets even accuse Socrates of teaching how to make
the worse cause seem the better, while Plato says that Gorgias and
Tisias made similar professions. And to these they add further
examples drawn from the history of Rome and Greece, enumerating all
those who used their pernicious eloquence not merely against
individuals but against whole states and threw an ordered commonwealth
into a state of turmoil or even brought it to utter ruin; and they
point out that for this very reason rhetoric was banished from Sparta,
while its powers were cut down at Athens itself by the fact that an
orator was forbidden to stir the passions of his audience. On the
showing of these critics not only orators but generals, magistrates,
medicine and philosophy I will all be useless. For Flaminius was a
general, while men such as the Gracchi, Saturninus and Glaucia were
magistrates. Doctors have been caught using poisons, and those who
falsely assume the name of philosopher have occasionally been detected
in the gravest crimes. Let us give up eating, it often makes us ill;
let us never go inside houses, for sometimes they collapse on their
occupants; let never a sword be forged for a soldier, since it might
be used by a robber. And who does not realise that fire and water,
both necessities of life, and, to leave merely earthly things, even
the sun and moon, the greatest of the heavenly bodies, are
occasionally capable of doing harm.

On the other hand will it be denied that it was by his gift of speech
that Appius the Blind broke off the dishonourable peace which was on
the point of being concluded with Pyrrhus? Did not the divine
eloquence of Cicero win popular applause even when he denounced the
Agrarian laws, did it not crush the audacious plots of Catiline and
win, while he still wore the garb of civil life, the highest honour
that can be conferred on a victorious general, a public thanksgiving
to heaven? Has not oratory often revived the courage of a
panic-stricken army and persuaded the soldier faced by all the perils
of war that glory is a fairer thing than life itself? Nor shall the
history of Sparta and Athens move me more than that of the Roman
people, who have always held the orator in highest honour. Never in
my opinion would the founders of cities have induced their unsettled
multitudes to form communities had they not moved them by the magic of
their eloquence: never without the highest gifts of oratory would the
great legislators have constrained mankind to submit themselves to the
yoke of law. Nay, even the principles which should guide our life,
however fair they may be by nature, yet have greater power to mould
the mind to virtue, when the beauty of things is illumined by the
splendour of eloquence. Wherefore, although the weapons of oratory may
be used either for good or ill, it is unfair to regard that as an evil
which can be employed for good.

These problems, however, may be left to those who hold that rhetoric
is the power to persuade. If our definition of rhetoric as the science
of speaking well implies that an orator must be a good man, there can
be no doubt about its usefulness. And in truth that god, who was in
the beginning, the father of all things and the architect of the
universe, distinguished man from all other living creatures that are
subject to death, by nothing more than this, that he gave him the gift
of speech. For as regards physical bulk, strength, robustness,
endurance or speed, man is surpassed in certain cases by dumb beasts,
who also are far more independent of external assistance. They know by
instinct without need of any teacher how to move rapidly, to feed
themselves and swim. Many too have their bodies clothed against cold,
possess natural weapons and have not to search for their food, whereas
in all these respects man's life is full of toil. Reason then was the
greatest gift of the Almighty, who willed that we should share its
possession with the immortal gods. But reason by itself would help us
but little and would be far less evident in us, had we not the power
to express our thoughts in speech; for it is the lack of this power
rather than thought and understanding, which they do to a certain
exercise possess, that is the great defect in other living things. The
construction of a soft lair, the weaving of nests, the hatching and
rearing of their young, and even the storing up of food for the coming
winter, together with certain other achievements which we cannot
imitate, such as the making of honey and wax, all these perhaps
indicate the possession of a certain degree of reason; but since the
creatures that do these things lack the gift of speech they are called
dumb and unreasoning beasts. Finally, how little the heavenly boon of
reason avails those who are born dumb. If therefore we have received
no fairer gift from heaven than speech, what shall we regard as so
worthy of laborious cultivation, or in what should we sooner desire to
excel our fellow-men, than that in which mankind excels all other
living things? And we should be all at more eager to do so, since
there is no art which yields a more grateful recompense for the labour
bestowed upon it. This will be abundantly clear if we consider the
origins of oratory and the progress it has made; and it is capable of
advancing still further. I will not stop to point out how useful and
how becoming a task it is for a good man to defend his friends, to
guide the senate by his counsels, and to lead peoples or armies to
follow his bidding; I merely ask, is it not a noble thing, by
employing the understanding which is common to mankind and the words
that are used by all, to win such honour and glory that you seem not
to speak or plead, but rather, as was said of Pericles, to thunder and
lighten?" - Quintilian,
"Institutio Oratoria" II.17

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Quintilian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44416 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
Salve Colleague,

> I'm going to interpret your question to mean, "can a NR citizen do this
> without risk of prosecution or Censorial nota."
>
> > 5. Make angry generalities against Christians.
> No.
> > 6. Make angry generalities against Muslims.
> No.
> > 7. Make angry generalities against Jews.
> No.
> > 8. Make angry generalities against Pagans.
> No.

This would have to depend on the nature and frequency of the
"angry generalities". Discussion of legitimate historical
issues (even if tinged with anger) should never be prosecuted.
(Examples: "Christians caused the downfall of Rome" vs.
"Christians saved Rome from Pagan depravity"; both of these,
while somewhat inflammatory, are legitimate perspectives and
should not be prosecuted).

Nota and prosecution should be reserved for those who go far
beyond merely expressing generalities; such as persons who
advocate revocation of civil rights for members of a particular
group. As an example, the person recently receiving a Nota
is on record as wishing to deny women the right to vote; this
is incompatible with our egalitarian society, and we expressed
our rejection of that evil.

Vale, M. Octavius Germanicus.


--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44417 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
A. Apollonius P. Dominio omnibusque sal.

> In Europe and Canada MOST political speech is tolerated, this generally
excludes Nazi ideology, racism, and "religionism. " In some places you can
be fined in other places jailed. If you don't believe me, try goose
stepping while doing the straight arm salute and singing Deutchland Uberalis
along the Champs Elysees or in front of the Bundestag. <

As U.S. officials have from time to time been keen to point out, there is more to Europe than France and Germany! Some European countries make it a criminal offence to views of the kind you mention, it's true. But of course this is a very long way from your balder statement that in Europe one cannot say anything which is offensive - I hope we can agree that that was something of an over-statement.

> I think that this is a fuller explanation of my understanding of free speech
as it exists in Europe. Is England a part of Europe? <

Yes. Although not physically attached to the main European land-mass, the British Isles are classed by geographers as belonging to the European continent. Culturally there can be little doubt that Britain's heritage is European, being the fusion of traditions deriving from the Celts (based in northern Europe and in Britain), the Romans (naturally Europeans), the Anglo-Saxons (from northern Europe), and the Norman French (from Scandinavia by way of northern France). The U.K. is a member of the European Union. I can't really think of any sense in which one could say England is not part of Europe. Perhaps some people would say we are more like North America than like Europe, but from a historical point of view that puts the cart before the horse!

> I appreciate your invitation, but I try to limit how many offensive things I
say each year, and I may be over my quota for 2759. <

Okay then, come to the Conventus and don't say anything offensive, just enjoy the visits, company, museums, conversation, live chariot races, seminars, games, &c. :)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44418 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: "New Graphics Website" posting
A. Apollonius Faustae Martianae omnibusque sal.

> The Conventus sounds wonderful, but I'm afraid it's beyond my meager budget.
:-( However, we have a lottery here in California, so maybe I'll get lucky
one day! I really hope I'll be able to attend some day, or at least see
Hadrian's Wall in person, instead of just on TV. <

Oh well, you're welcome any time.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44419 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: Piso's resignation - on citizenship
A. Apollonius P. Memmio omnibusque sal.

> Amice, I think that you confound two things : the place where you are
physically and the juridical relation between a human being and a
state (= the citizenship) . Naturally, you can leave U.K. to
sail/fly/drive/ ride/walk to Portugal. But you still remain a "subject
of U.K. law" (= a citizen of the U.K.).
You may naturally become a citizen of Portugal, but if and only if
Portugal accepts to grant you its citizenship. The difference with
the relation with an NGO like NR is that in our macronational states,
we cannot freely choose to refuse to be linked with the community
(the citizenship) . <

That's a fair distinction, but nonetheless it is not true that I cannot choose to refuse to be a citizen of the U.K. I can renounce my citizenship, so long as I have some other citizenship also. The only impossibility is to be without any citizenship at all.

> Yes, we could say : "the more we are, the more we mathematically have
among us different kinds of people, included extremists and
fundamentalists. "
But we cannot stay at this stage of the reasoning, because you could
be answered : "and if we do not want to (increase largely our
population, count extr. and fund. among us) ?".
Here comes again the question of Nova Roma's nature, between its
juridical status (a NGO) and what it hopes to be : a nation, a state,
etc..

That is not an easy question. <

Indeed. Nonetheless, I don't think that when we consider our own actions as a community we should bother too much about what external legal systems think we are. It places upon us certain practical constraints, but it should not influence our decision-making in principle: we should not say "well, we are not a state, so we should not behave like one". That would quite undermine the nature of Nova Roma.

> First because I am not sure that our res publica does give potential
applicants clear guidelines on what is the "philosophy" (the social
contract)of our community. I think on this point that we should all
make the effort, with our patres patriae, to actualise the
Declaration of NR.
I may hear your voice, amice... it tells : "we all share the feeling
to "be romans"". Yes, but there seems to be a wide range of "how to
be a roman" ways, included the more brutal ones... <

This is true, but we can nonetheless distinguish between a proper way to be Roman and an improper way. Certainly a fascist may believe that his views are Roman views, but the simple fact is that, as T. Julius has said, this is not true. Fascism has very little to do with the real Roman republic: the link between the two was a fantasy of people who were ignorant of Roman history. So I think it *is* sufficient to say that the culture of Nova Roma is "to be Roman", because being truly Roman is necessarily incompatible with being a fascist.

> Second, precisely NR is not - according macronational current law -
considered as a state, but as a NGO. And the national laws on NGO all
join in giving members the free right to enter and quit them, and
define the scope of the common project. As such, we must recognize
here that Cassius's question is founded. Each of us may ask her/him-
self, one day : "do the reasons why I sign up for this project are
still accurate ?" and, if not, to think about a withdrawal. <

Of course someone may choose to leave, just as someone may choose to leave any community *including* a nation-state. I am sure you will acknowledge that I never for a moment questioned C. Cassius' *right* to leave, merely the *reasonableness* of that action. It is one thing to leave a community because that community has become unacceptabe, but it is quite another to leave it merely because it contains another person whom one finds unacceptable.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44420 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
A. Apollonius C. Equitio omnibusque sal.

A few notes on your research, amice.

> According to the most plausible interpretation, one of the laws of the
Twelve Tables (fifth Century B.C.) punished slander by death.
Aristocrats were likely to derive most advantage from such a provision
which can be paralleled in other societies (Anglo-Saxons punished
slander by the excision of the tongue). <

Now, this is a very tricky problem. We should mention that the provision in question only explicitly refers to *songs*. In other words, it would not have covered political invective delivered in public meetings or in the senate, but only deliberately composed propaganda. There is also the difficulty that we have no clear evidence of this provision actually being implemented, which makes it very difficult to know what it was really used for and how often it was used, if at all. It may possibly account for the fact that surviving Roman plays (the most popular form of musical entertainment) very rarely contain attacks on living public figures. That brings us to the exception:

> At the end of the third
century B.C., the poet Naevius seems to have been prosecuted in
accordance with this law when he attacked the powerful Metelli in a
theatrical performance (the details are extremely obscure). <

Extremely obscure indeed. What actually happened to Naevius is unclear, and why it happened is virtually impenetrable. He is known to have composed a line "Fortune made the Metelli consules at Rome" (implying that they reached high office by Fortune's favour rather than by merit). This, as you see, is pretty mild stuff. The evidence does seem to suggest that it was regarded as insulting, though I stuggle to see quite why since most Romans regarded being favoured by Fortune as an entirely admirable quality and not at all the same sort of thing as blind luck. The Metelli are said to have responded with their own verse, something to the effect of "The Metelli will give Naevius the poet a good kicking". Some say that Naevius went into exile, though it's not absolutely clear whether it was actually in connexion with this event. Plautus mentions a barbarian poet in chains in one of his contemporary plays (remember that his characters were Greeks, so to them a Roman poet would be
a barbarian), and this has been seen as a reference to Naevius. All this doesn't stack up very neatly. If the Metelli were going to prosecute Naevius for the death penalty, why did they also make the good-humoured response of writing a verse, and why in that verse did they talk simply about giving him a good kicking? If he was prosecuted under this provision, why did he survive and go into exile? It's true that most people prosecuted for the death penalty were allowed to go into voluntary exile, but then again this would have been impossible if he had actually been arrested pending trial, which is what must have occurred if he was actually in chains as Plautus may suggest. The whole business is very difficult to interpret; but we can agree that it does seem to show that Naevius pushed the boundaries of acceptable political commentary in drama. It also illustrates the difference between slander on the stage and slander in the senate-house or in the forum, because there can
be absolutely no doubt that every Roman politician had far worse things said about him on the average day in the senate or in a public meeting.

> Later this
law fell into desuetude, and slander was prosecuted as iniuria - which
was stretched to cover attacks in theaters against individuals. <

It's important to note, though, that injuria was a rather different beast from modern slander. It included all sorts of things like physical assault, unjustified obstruction, harrassment, insulting words, and so on: the essence of injuria was that it was an unjustified interference with a person's right to expect a level of respect appropriate to his station in life. But the offender was only liable for a verbal attack if he had genuinely offended the person concerned. This would have meant that most criticism would not have constituted injuria since Roman politicians had fairly thick skins and would not have been offended by much.

> At
least since the time of Augustus (if not of Sulla) offensive words
against persons in authority came under the law of maiestas: here
again details are by no means clear. <

The crimen majestatis was rather a strange beast also. Essentially it was the crime of doing anything which diminished the greatness of the Roman people. Verbal criticisms of an elected officer of the Roman people could conceivably have this effect, but the prosecutor would have to get over a very high hurdle in order to prove it. I can't think at the moment of any cases during the republic which were based on verbal criticism.

> Foreign philosophers and
rhetoricians were thrown out of Rome more than once in the second and
first centuries B.C. under the ordinary coercive powers of the
magistrates, who had the support of the Senate. This amounted to
implicit interference with education. <

Hmm... I'm not sure about that. We might not endorse those decisions, and indeed they were not universally supported at the time, but there are some points to be made on the other side. First, the magistrates who expelled these philosophers were doing so out of a concern for public morality and public order. What the philosophers were doing which was regarded as objectionable was providing public demonstrations of sophistry: the use of formal logic to appear to disprove universally accepted truths. One can to some extent understand why the authorities thought it undesirable for the public to be taught to doubt everything. Moreover, there were no moves against these philosophers merely for teaching: the expulsions came when they made their lectures into public entertainments. The same material was already available from private tutors and from books. To understand how the Roman magistrates reacted to these philosophers we might think about how modern western governments
react to visiting radical Islamist preachers.

> The general impression one receives for the last century of the
Republic is that in both political and intellectual life tongues moved
freely. But this was a period of crisis, and even in this period the
beneficiaries must have been a restricted privileged group. Men like
Cicero felt that there was less freedom of speech in Rome than in
Athens - and yet this admission did not imply any regret. It is
typical of Republican Rome that freedom of speech was never directly
and precisely connected with the more general notion of libertas. The
very terminology of freedom of speech, however, pointed to a
relationship between freedom in general and freedom of speech in
particular: we hear of libera lingua, oratio libera. It goes without
saying that by the first century B.C. Roman terminology was influenced
by Greek usage. Yet parrhesia (the Greek phrase which most closely
mirrors a contemporary understanding of "freedom of speech" - although
it was, naturally, limited to land-owning men) never had an exact
equivalent in Rome; when it was translated by licentia, contumacia, an
element of criticism was often implied. The general attitude seems to
have been that only persons in authority had a right to speak freely:
one senses that freedom of speech belongs to the sphere of auctoritas
just as much as to the sphere of libertas. <

I'd go along with a lot of this, but perhaps not with the final conclusion. It might be more accurate to say that the Romans never conceived freedom of speech as a right. Indeed thinking about freedom of speech as a right has only really made sense since in relatively modern times it became practiable for governments to actually stop people speaking freely. In Roman times you could speak freely inasmuch as no one could easily stop you, so the question whether you had a right to do so never really arose any more than the question whether you had a right to have hair. There's no doubt that when we talk about political speech we're mostly talking about the upper class simply because that was the political class. But we shouldn't hurry to say that poor Romans were not free to criticise politicians: on the contrary, there is absolutely no evidence that any attempt was made to stop them doing so. It's simply that by and large the upper class would not take very much notice of
what they said. They might well, if asked, have said that the idiots should keep their mouths shut about things they didn't understand. But that's a long way from denying that they had a *right* to say such things.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44421 From: P. Dominus Antonius Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: Free Speech?
1. Yes, but are France and Germany aware of this?
2. Of course it was a bald statement I am after all going bald. ;)
3. Overstatement? Well yes.
4. Regarding England as a part of Europe, this really was said tongue in
cheek.
5. Given a bit more time and money, I may take you up on that invitation.

>|P. Dominus Antonius|<
Tony Dah m

Si vis pacem, para bellum - Vegetius
Islam religio pacis, nex omnibus dissentint.


On 6/14/06, A. Apollonius Cordus <a_apollonius_cordus@...> wrote:

As U.S. officials have from time to time been keen to point out, there is
more to Europe than France and Germany! Some European countries make it a
criminal offence to views of the kind you mention, it's true. But of course
this is a very long way from your balder statement that in Europe one cannot
say anything which is offensive - I hope we can agree that that was
something of an over-statement.

Yes. Although not physically attached to the main European land-mass, the
British Isles are classed by geographers as belonging to the European
continent. Culturally there can be little doubt that Britain's heritage is
European, being the fusion of traditions deriving from the Celts (based in
northern Europe and in Britain), the Romans (naturally Europeans), the
Anglo-Saxons (from northern Europe), and the Norman French (from Scandinavia
by way of northern France). The U.K. is a member of the European Union. I
can't really think of any sense in which one could say England is not part
of Europe. Perhaps some people would say we are more like North America than
like Europe, but from a historical point of view that puts the cart before
the horse!


> I appreciate your invitation, but I try to limit how many offensive
things I
say each year, and I may be over my quota for 2759. <

Okay then, come to the Conventus and don't say anything offensive, just
enjoy the visits, company, museums, conversation, live chariot races,
seminars, games, &c. :)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44422 From: antistoicus Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
Kristoffer From <from@...> wrote:

> antistoicus wrote:
> > The problem is, Yahoo's mail program has no
> > such option. (I'm posting from yahoo.com).
>
> Salve,
>
> Consider switching to GMail, it's 2GB+ of storage area

Wow. How often do you have to log in to keep your account active?

> and I've got a lot of invites standing by if you want one.

Please. I'd appreciate it.

> Alternatively, are you using Microsoft Internet Exploder?

Never heard of it.

> It's quite possible that switching to Firefox would solve
> this problem as well as multiple others you aren't as of
> yet familiar with.

Perhaps, but the complicating factor is that in all of the
time I've been online, this is the first time this problem
has ever presented itself to me. Not a bad problem to have,
as problems go, but it does mean that a solution could
prove effective and I'd never know it.

I do have Firefox, as I use it for my Bravenet account. Maybe
I'll start using that.

> In any case, it's always a good idea to be using the
> latest version of a browser.

Quite appreciated. I am fairly obsessive on the subject of
keeping everything up to date on my system.



Antistoicus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44423 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: Warning!Beware!Do Not open new site box message!
Salve,

antistoicus wrote:
> Kristoffer From <from@...> wrote:
> > Consider switching to GMail, it's 2GB+ of storage area
>
> Wow. How often do you have to log in to keep your account active?

I'm not sure you have to. I recently forgot all about mine for five
months, when I came back it had increased in size by 500MB or so and I
had 50 or more extra invites to send out.

antistoicus wrote:
> Kristoffer From <from@...> wrote:
> > and I've got a lot of invites standing by if you want one.
>
> Please. I'd appreciate it.

Sent it. 96 left, on that account - and I've got another with just as
many. If anyone else wants one, let me know. It costs me nothing and
they're really useful. There's even this great feature that lets you use
the storage space as an extra harddrive to save documents on, which is
accessible from any computer with internet access and Windows. Which
sucks, since I run Linux. ;)

antistoicus wrote:
> Kristoffer From <from@...> wrote:
> > Alternatively, are you using Microsoft Internet Exploder?
>
> Never heard of it.

*cough* Might've put a 'd' where an 'r' "should" be. Or so the
propaganda would suggest.

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 44424 From: P.Memmius Albucius Date: 2006-06-14
Subject: Re: Traiana inscriptio
P. Memmius Albucius Propr. Sabino omnibusque s.d.

We wrote:

(..)
> You have done a fine remark, amice. Your point of view is correct.
> It seems is a mistake there. The inscription from Epigraphic
> Datenbank, and I guess that is the correct one, said that Traian
was in his 5th trib. power and in his 4th. consulate.

So the inscription of your 4th picture(in http://www.dacia-
novaroma.org/drobeta.htm) is dated on 101 a.d., before the autumn.


>(..) the inscription about the Roman Path striked in stone ( Tabula
>Traiana ) is different :
> From Epigraphic Datenbank :

> "Imp(erator) Caesar divi Nervae f(ilius) / Nerva Traianus Aug
(ustus)
> Germ(anicus) / pontif(ex) maximus trib(unicia) pot(estate) IIII /
> pater patriae co(n)s(ul) III / montibus excisi[s] anco[ni]bus /
> sublat[i]s via[m r]e[fecit]"

The last translated part of the inscription would then be :
« (Traian...) having notched the mountains and subdued the waters,
made a road.»
(I guess that it is the via along the Danube)

> So the ancient roman road was done/finished between 100 - 101 AD.

We may be more precise and say year 100 a.d..

Thanks for the other interesting informations, Aedile.

Vale(-te),


P. Memmius Albucius
Legatus Lugd. Galliae