Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Oct 7-12, 2006

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46090 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: Priscus/Keller and RealRome Yahoogroup
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46091 From: dicconf Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: Harvest Approaches
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46092 From: Rick Sciarappa Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: Candidate for Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46093 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46094 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: End of the Candidacy Declaration Period is Over.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46095 From: worldbeat Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: ATTENTION CANDIDATES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46096 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: End of the Candidacy Declaration Period is Over.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46097 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Election announcement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46098 From: Maior Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46099 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul of Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46100 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul of Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46101 From: cant97@hughes.net Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul of Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46102 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul of Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46103 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Faustus for consul!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46104 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46105 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46106 From: mike orley Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Salvete!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46107 From: legio_vi_tribunis Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Things to Consider before voting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46108 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: post. Non. Oct.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46109 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Salvete!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46110 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: CPT: Extension of Period to Declare Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46111 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46112 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46113 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46114 From: legio_vi_tribunis Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Things to Consider
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46115 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46116 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: C. Curium Saturninum Aedilem Plebis Oro Vos Faciatis!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46117 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46118 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46119 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: F. Galerius Aurelianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46120 From: Maior Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46121 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46122 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46123 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46124 From: legio_vi_tribunis Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Consul Candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46125 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: C. Curium Saturninum Aedilem Plebis Oro Vos Faciatis!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46126 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46127 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Things to Consider about candidates for Consul.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46128 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Events
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46129 From: Maior Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46130 From: Maior Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Faustus for consul!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46131 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46132 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46133 From: Maior Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46134 From: Maior Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Events
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46135 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Events
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46136 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Venator scripsit...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46137 From: legio_vi_tribunis Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Events, for the Record
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46138 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Announcement for Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46139 From: Maior Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Events
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46140 From: Maior Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Events, for the Record
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46141 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Events
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46142 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: a.d. VII Id. Oct.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46143 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46144 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46145 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46146 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Announcement for Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46147 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46148 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR OCTOBER 9, 2006
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46149 From: m.vipsanius Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Events
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46150 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46151 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46152 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46153 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46154 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: FW: [Latinitas] DE LINGUA LATINA IN NR: Learn to speak LATIN, join
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46155 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46156 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46157 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: ATTENTION GOVERNORS AND PROVINCIAL WEBMASTERS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46158 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46159 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46160 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46161 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46162 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46163 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46164 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46165 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46166 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46167 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46168 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46169 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46170 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46171 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46172 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46173 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46174 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46175 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46176 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR OCTOBER 9, 2006
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46177 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR OCTOBER 9, 2006
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46178 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46179 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR OCTOBER 9, 2006
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46180 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR OCTOBER 9, 2006
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46181 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46182 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR OCTOBER 9, 2006
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46183 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR OCTOBER 9, 2006
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46184 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46185 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: Patrem Auctoritas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46186 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46187 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: a.d. VI Id. Oct.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46188 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR OCTOBER 9, 2006
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46189 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46190 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: Patrem Auctoritas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46191 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46192 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46193 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46194 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46195 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Lucius Arminius Faustus for Consul of Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46196 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46197 From: Ben Radcliffe Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46198 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46199 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46200 From: legio_vi_tribunis Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46201 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46202 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46203 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Another candidate for Tribune
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46204 From: Claudio Guzzo Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: salvete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46205 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46206 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46207 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46208 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46209 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Senatus Populusque Romanus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46210 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46211 From: Lucius Iunius Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: De Principe Senatus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46212 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: Senatus Populusque Romanus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46213 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Perspectives on Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46214 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: Perspectives on Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46215 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: Senatus Populusque Romanus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46216 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: The Senate, the Constitution, and small letters vs BIG LETTERS.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46217 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: De Principe Senatus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46218 From: jerichomyles2002 Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Open positions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46219 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Open positions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46220 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Call for Plebeian Candidates Now Closed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46221 From: Lucius Iunius Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: De Principe Senatus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46222 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: a.d. V Id. Oct.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46223 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Senatus Populusque Romanus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46224 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: De Principe Senatus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46225 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Senatus Populusque Romanus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46226 From: drumax.tribal Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Happy Day!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46227 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46228 From: P.Memmius Albucius Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46229 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46230 From: Steven Massa Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46231 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46232 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46233 From: drumax Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46234 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46235 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46236 From: m.vipsanius Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Anyone enjoyed Meditrinalia?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46237 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Poll for NR Citizens in America Austrorientalis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46238 From: drumax Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46239 From: Rick Sciarappa Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Anyone enjoyed Meditrinalia?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46240 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46241 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Election info
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46242 From: m.vipsanius Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Anyone enjoyed Meditrinalia?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46243 From: drumax Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46244 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: New file uploaded to Nova-Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46245 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Apology for absence
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46246 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Oct.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46247 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul : A few ide
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46248 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: New file uploaded to Nova-Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46249 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul : A few
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46250 From: legio_vi_tribunis Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Off Topic: Roman Historical Society
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46251 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul : A few ideas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46252 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Provincial Edictum XXVI-Appointment of Praefectus Regio Mississippi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46253 From: drumax Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul : A few ideas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46254 From: leotarious Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Salve May Fratera's
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46255 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Salve May Fratera's
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46256 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Publicity needs action rather than money
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46257 From: drumax Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Publicity needs action rather than money
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46258 From: Honesta Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Caelestes Privati
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46259 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Publicity needs action rather than money
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46260 From: Joseph Marzullo Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Off Topic: Roman Historical Society
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46261 From: Joseph Marzullo Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Publicity needs action rather than money
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46262 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Publicity needs action AND money
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46263 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Off Topic: Roman Historical Society
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46264 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Publicity needs action rather than money
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46265 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Book Of Interest (Nero's Killing Machine)



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46090 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: Priscus/Keller and RealRome Yahoogroup
Salve Marce Octavi,

ROFLOL, I think you missed your calling - comedy!

QSP

> It's probably the only Roman reconstructionist group around in
which
> the standard-issue toga comes with a pointed hood.
>
> Vale, O.
>
> --
> Marcus Octavius Gracchus
> octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com
>
> "What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
> clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
> over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46091 From: dicconf Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: Harvest Approaches
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006, gequitiuscato wrote:

> Cato quirites salutem plurimam dicit.
>
> Salvete omnes!
>
> In a light-hearted salute to the approaching harvest season, I offer
> this, courtesy of the Ad Hog Camerata and the Snouto Domoinko de Silo:
>
> "Vox spiritus fundi sumus. Dormiunt omnes. Stertunt porci clari. O!
> Primam lucem! Sol surgit! Gallus magnifice incendens exclamat!
>
> Ecce! MacDonaldus senex, qui fundum habet; et in hoc fundo, nonnullas
> boves domesticas habet. Eieio. Cum mumu hic, et mumu ibi. Hic una mu
> et ibi una mu; ubique una mu. MacDonaldus senex fundum habet. Eieio.
> Et in hoc fundo, nonnullus porcos habet. Cum oincoinc hic, et
> oincoinc ibi, et - Ni oinc hic? Ni oinc ibi? Sed ubi sunt porci
> quoquomodo? Ecce! Dormiunt - vocamus ad se frustra. Consurgite
> porci! Sol fuget, dies serenus est; dicimus: consurgite porci! O
> porci ignavissimi! Diem absumitis! Hora fugit! Si non nunc
> venietis, cibum gallinis dabo! Demum veniunt porci."

But do we get fries with that?

-- P. Livius Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46092 From: Rick Sciarappa Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: Candidate for Consul
Salvete,

I agree completely!
I am very happy to see that Marcus Moravius Horatianus is running for
Consul.

Valete

Lucius Cassius Cornutus






On Oct 7, 2006, at 1:51 PM, L. Salix Cicero wrote:

> Salvete
>
> I hereby give my full support to Marcus Moravius Horatianus as a
> candidate for Consul of Nova Roma. He will make an excellent Consul,
> and I encourage others to support him.
>
> Valete
> L. Salix Cicero
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: marcushoratius
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 4:59 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Candidate for Consul
>
> Salvete Quirites
>
> I, Marcus Moravius Horatianus, don the toga candida and humbly enter
> the Forum once more, this time as candidate for Consul of our Res
> Publica.
>
> Nova Roma, it should be understood, is part of a much wider community
> of Roman enthusiasts than just its own current members. The Census
> of 2005 showed how Nova Roma has had a turn over of 80% of its
> membership during the past five-year period. Former citizens may
> have left Nova Roma itself, but they remain part of the same wider
> community in which Nova Roma shares. The challenge before Nova Roma
> today is to be a community of Romanitas for its own citizens, to
> welcome back former members, and to attract new members from this
> wider community of which we are a part.
>
> I was first elected Tribunus Plebis for the year 2001. Health issues
> and other personal issues required that I resign from office, and my
> citizenship from Nova Roma as well, after serving for only two and a
> half months. For the past five years I have been involved with
> various Roman communities, mainly teaching others about the religio
> Romana. I have been a member of the Board of Advisores to the Temple
> Religio Romana, and twice served as Consul in the Societas Via Romana
> as well as Rector of SVR's Collegium Religiosum. I taught courses at
> Academia Thules for which, in 2004, the Senate of Nova Roma paid me
> the honor of special recognition for my work. This was a very special
> honor for me personally, and much of a surprise, as I was not then a
> citizen of Nova Roma. Later then I became Decanus of the religious
> Studies Program at Academia Thules. And there are other Roman
> communities with which I have been involved, either on line or in
> person, performing Roman ritual or lending my views on Romanitas. I
> returned as a citizen of Nova Roma in June 2005, serving then as
> scriba to Censor Fabius Buteo Quintillius, on whose behalf I directed
> the effort made in conducting the Census of 2005. For this current
> year of 2006 I have been serving once more as Tribunus Plebis, as
> Procurator and Sacredos in provincia Lacus Magni, and as a scriba to
> Aedilis Curulis Titus Sabinus for the Magna Mater Project. Typical
> of others, my sojourn has been one that took me through many parts of
> our wider community of Roman enthusiasts before returning to our Res
> Publica of Nova Roma. I am grateful for the reception I have received
> upon my return, meeting once more with old friends and making new
> friends. At the same time I am aware of others, some former members
> of Nova Roma and others who have not yet been introduced to our Res
> Publica, who could be welcomed additions to our community.
>
> Nova Roma is a social, educational, and religious organizations.
> Each aspect of Nova Roma needs to be revitalized and developed
> further. This is not some thing that can be done by proposing new
> laws, distracting our attention into online debates, but rather must
> be addressed in the manner by which we conduct Nova Roma affairs. In
> order to provide for our Citizens, we shall have to refocus our
> attention on a local level. In that way we shall reinforce the
> social bonds that hold our Citizens together while they in turn
> attract new members. We also, from the central level, have to better
> assist and provide for local communities of our Citizens.
>
> One area of concern that I think we will need to take up in the
> coming is a reorganization of our provincial system. Suggested by
> the Census 2005 is that provincial organization should be based in
> local communites rather than according to arbitrarily drawn
> boundaries. In 2007 another census shall be held, and what will be
> needed is to formulate how information gained from that census may be
> used. This is a matter that has been discussed by magistrates over
> the past two years, and I will later provide my ideas on the issue.
>
> Another thing that we should do is to focus on specific projects,
> with delineated goals by which to measure our progress. Nova Roma
> has one such project already in the Magna Mater Project. Individual
> Citizens have taken it upon themselves to found a Roman podcast, to
> establish religious sanctuaries, and to perform other activities. We
> need to develop more projects, some at a very local level, in order
> to engage our Citizens and to help further develop Nova Roma's
> community. Changing our focus over to projects will go hand in hand
> with reorganizing our provinciae.
>
> More is needed from the central organization in providing
> informational support to local communities and to individuals.
> Primarily our informational resources can be found in our sodalitates
> and Collegium. We have relied perhaps too much on individuals
> referring to our website for informational support. I would like to
> see instead the Consules work with our sodalitates and Collegium
> Pontificum to coordinate active dissemination of our informational
> resources down to local levels, through our Propraetores, in order to
> foster monthly activities.
>
> It will be by local gatherings of our Citizens, engaging in
> activities, that will inspire projects for all of our Citizens to
> participate in. This will in turn eventually build a stronger
> community, one that is more stable than a community based primarily
> in online activity, and will then in turn attract new members into
> our Res Publica as they see what Nova Roma can provide. This is a
> long range plan for revitalizing Nova Roma. The means are already in
> place. We need only to lay a foundation in the coming year for
> managing and coordinating our efforts. I hope that you wil see in me
> one of the Consules needed to steer Nova Roma back in this direction
> of local involvement and future growth.
>
> Valete et vadete in pace Deorum
>
> M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
>
> Flamen Carmentalis
> Tribunus Plebis
> Procurator Lacus Magni
> Sacerdos Lacus Magni
> Scriba Aedile TIS: Magna Mater Project
> Decanus Facultatis Theologiae, Academia Thules
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46093 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Salve mi Corde

Your questions and comments touch on many issues that need to be
addressed in the coming years. As you pointed out, the same subject
has been raised before by candidates to different offices, and this
year's candidates for the consulship each recognize the need for Nova
Roma to move from being primarily an online community to one composed
by active local communities in the real world. In the past we have
primarily relied on our Proconsules and Propraetores to form local
communities within their respective provinciae. Some have been more
successful than others. In general, even those who have had a
measure of success have done so in only certain parts of their
respective provinciae. The role of the Consules in all of this has
been mainly to find individuals to hold the offices of Proconsules
and Propraetores and to receive reports that they present to the
Senate. With few exceptions, the Consules have not been able to take
an active role in managing the Proconsules and Propraetores, and even
where they could, it has not been throughout all of Nova Roma.

Nova Roma remains primarily an online community. In the past five
years we have had over 5,000 individuals join, and yet retained only
20% of these. Of those who are cives, only a portion subscribe to
our lists, only a small portion of cives pay taxes to become assidui,
of the assidui only a portion vote, and among our voters only a
portion actively engage in holding offices. Those proportions are
consistent to what is found in other online communities - a high turn
over in membership and a proportion of about 30% participation in
various categories. In other words, statistically Nova Roma
exhibits every sign of being just an online community.

As you know, from working with me on the Census 2005, our Citizens
are rather scattered in some regions. However the census also showed
that we have some clusters of Citizens within distances that could be
helpful in forming oppidi and municipi as was envisioned by the Lex
Fabia to which you referred. That law made it the responsibility of
individual Citizens to form such communities. Instead of considering
rewriting the law, or trying to come up with a new law, I think that
next year's Consules will have to find new ways to impliment this
law. The first thing of course will be to set up guidelines for such
local communities. With the Census 2007 we will then gain
information on where they might be formed. The Consules should
actively work with Propraetores and with individual Citizens to get
local members to meet one another and encourage them to form a local
community.

Forming local communities will take time. I don't think we will
accomplish in one year the establishment of all the local communities
that would be needed for a reorganization of our provinciae, but we
need to start now. The reorganization of provicia has been discussed
by a few magistrates over the past two years. This will have to be
addressed before the Senate, but again I do not think the process
will require new laws to impliment a plan. What is envisioned is
that Proconsules and Propraetores will be assigned to oversee oppidi
and municipi more on a regional basis. This will mean that some of
our provincia will be reduced in size to facilitate local
organization by having provincia become a collection of local
communities. At the same time, the number of Proconsules and
Propraetores needed to manage the system may be reduced by placing
them over individual local communities and over what we now
provinciae. As an example, North America could be assigned to four
or five Propraetores, rather than to the current ten we now have, in
order to handle certain administrative needs, but for the average
Citizen, they will be organized into local communities.

We will also have to provide local groups with support from our
central organization. You mentioned financial support. At the
moment our financial resources are very limited. We depend on taxes
to provide a steady income, and on member contribution to provide for
other needs. That income barely covers our current organizational
needs, and does not provide seed money for additional activities that
we would like to promote. Obviously we will need to find new ways to
find income for Nova Roma, and a better way of managing money so that
it accrues into funds as are needed. One possibility that can result
from a reorganization is that local communities will engage in
activities that can be profitable and also generate contributions.
In fact, one thing we want to see happen is for local communities to
take up projects, including fundraising projects. If they do so, as
a nonprofit organization we can seek grant money to fund some of our
projects. This has already been suggested, and attempted with the
Magna Mater Project. But I think we could also look towards smaller
projects, of not so lengthy a duration, that might also qualify for
grants.

The other thing that we can do, and that Consules in particular can
assist in beginning, is by providing informational support to our
local communities and to individuals who are interested in forming
local groups. One thing that in mentioned in the Lex Fabia is that
local communities would have to submit a draft charter to a
Propraetor. Why not provide a model of a draft charter to give
individuals ideas on how they might organize. The local communities
should meet at least once a month around planned activities. Just
something simple initially. But what could be done to help them, and
also individuals as well, is to employ our sodalitates and Collegium
Pontificum to give them such things as menus and recipes to hold a
dinner party, historical and cultural information for topics of
discussion, rituals to perform as part of their monthly activities.
As it is now, individuals can do this on their own by searching
through our website and old posts. What hasn't been attempted is to
coordinate a dissemination of such information, so that every Citizen
throughout Nova Roma could participate in the same activities each
month. We could use the internet to disseminate such informational
resources, but the activities themselves would not be online. By
taking such an approach we would instill a sense of belonging among
our individual members in a larger community.

Again, none of the ideas I have outlined above would necessarily
require new laws. It is more a matter of rethinking how we use our
resources, how we work together, manage our organization, and promote
ourselves to others. We all recognize that Nova Roma's future lies
with community building through real world activies. In the coming
year we have to begin moving in that direction.

Vale optime
M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
Candidate for Consul



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@...> wrote:
>
>
> A. Apollonius Fl. Vedio sal.
>
> This question is directed at you in particular because it relates
to your own manifesto, but I would also be interested to hear the
views of the other candidates for the consulate.
>
> You mention that you would, if elected, concentrate on "moving Nova
Roma towards being a more real-world
> community" and on "gaining new [citizens], [and] helping
> those who are new to learn about us and figure out how they can get
the
> most out of their Citizenship". I'm sure we would all agree that
these are desirable goals. What I wonder is whether they are goals
suitable to the office you're seeking. Let me explain a little.
>
> We have had previous candidates for the consulate who have
expressed similar desires. A number have been elected and have
served as consules. Very few, if any, have had any real impact on
the extent of face-to-face activity, the recruitment of new citizens,
or any other of what we might call "grass roots" issues of that
kind. I don't think this is for want of dedication or energy: I
think it's simply because they've found, once elected, that there is
not very much a consul can do to affect these issues. The main power
of a consul is to legislate, and these issues, more than any others,
are ones which respond very little to legislation. The lex Fabia de
oppidis et municipiis is perhaps an exception, but even three years
later there are very few oppida and no municipia, so although it did
provide a framework for these things to be established it did not do
very much (and indeed it never claimed to do much) to promote their
establishment. Similarly, I remember in particular the consulate of
Fr. Apulus, whose manifesto was in many ways similar to yours: he was
a fine consul, and I'm sure he did his best to put his manifesto into
effect, but as far as I can recall there was absolutely no observable
growth in recruitment or retention of citizens or in the
participation of citizens in face-to-face events, or at least none
which had anything to do with anything which Apulus did as consul
(the conventus at Rome was of course a great success, but that was
nothing to do with the consulate).
>
> Everyone already agrees that face-to-face events are very important
and excellent things. The problem is that not enough of them are
happening. I find it very difficult to see what a consul can do
about this, unless he simply goes about organizing lots of events
himself: but then he does not need to be consul in order to do that.
I don't doubt your successes as governor, but simply installing a
good governor in the consulate will not automatically spread
the "good governor effect" to the whole republic. Similarly,
recruitment is a matter very much concerned with the facts on the
ground in particular areas, and a consul is not well placed to
influence this. As for retention and support, you mention that you'd
like to establish a coherent system of support for new citizens, and
this may well be an excellent idea, but what will you be able to do
to this end which you cannot do already? I express these worries not
to persuade you to change your manifesto, or to persuade you to
withdraw from the election, but in the hope that you will be able to
explain how you hope to bring the powers of the consulate to bear on
matters which have so far proved almost entirely immune to consular
influence. I very much hope you can, because they are matters which
certainly need to be addressed.
>
> I shall try to be helpful by making one suggestion of my own. One
thing the consules can do which no one else can do is to set, in
collaboration with the senate, economic policy. Is there some way
that the resources of the treasury could be used to promote your
objectives? Could public funds be made available, for example, to
help citizens at local and provincial level get together more often
or more easily? Could the treasury help new citizens to have cheaper
or easier access to the things they need to live a Roman life (books,
clothes, sacrificial offerings, &c.)? And if so, where will this
money come from and how will it affect the rest of the budget?
>
> In short, can a consul make any real difference on these "grass
roots issues", and how?
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all
new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46094 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: End of the Candidacy Declaration Period is Over.
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

The period to declare candidacy for elections for next year is over. I
thank everyone who has declared their candidacy and I especially thank the
web team for establishing an election page:
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Election_MMDCCLIX_%28Nova_Roma%29

This being said I will extend the call for candidates who wish to stand
for: Rogator, Diribitor, and Custos. The extension shall be for one week.

Thanks again to all our candidates for office.

Valete:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Consul


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46095 From: worldbeat Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: ATTENTION CANDIDATES
Salvete cives,

My name is Titus Pontius Silanus. As a new citizen, I offer to serve
Nova Roma in some small capacity, and offer my services as Diribitor.
Should a comparable post have greater need, I will gladly stand for
election for that position instead.

Though I have only been a citizen since 2006-05-09, I have studied
Rome 'From the Gracchi to Nero' (to name the primary textbook); have
visited Roman sites from Trimontium in Scotland to Carthage in
Tunisia; and have recently written a 100,000 word novel (looking for a
publisher) called "The Gospel According to the Occupation" - taking
the Roman view of the events surrounding the execution of the
insurrectionist Jesus of Nazareth.

Valete,

T. Pontius Silanus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46096 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: End of the Candidacy Declaration Period is Over.
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

Additionally, and apologizes to everyone for the oversight, the call for
candidates has been extended to include Quaestors.

Valete:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Consul

On 10/7/06, David Kling (Modianus) <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> The period to declare candidacy for elections for next year is over. I
> thank everyone who has declared their candidacy and I especially thank the
> web team for establishing an election page:
> http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Election_MMDCCLIX_%28Nova_Roma%29
>
> This being said I will extend the call for candidates who wish to stand
> for: Rogator, Diribitor, and Custos. The extension shall be for one week.
>
> Thanks again to all our candidates for office.
>
> Valete:
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
> Consul
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46097 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Election announcement
Salvete

My name is Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa and I wish to announce that I will stand for election to the office of custos. In the past I have been a quaestor, assigned to Curule Aedile Gaius Iulius Scaurus. Currently, I am one of the five tribunes of the plebs and the procurator in the province of Canada Occidentalis.

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46098 From: Maior Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
M. Hortensia A. Apollonio sal;
well I do think the treasury should
1. subsidize a website for an official online temple to the Capitoline
triad.
2. mint coins & make money
3. Go into the lararium business; I want one, I cannot make one;-)
I'd pay for one.

With funds we could organize an American Conventus, perhaps at the
same time as Pantheacon, which takes place in February in San Jose
California. Who wouldn't enjoy going to the sunshine in February? Plus
air fares to California are cheap. The last time I looked it was
$218.00 from the East Coast round trip.

I'd go & I bet others would too. We just need the will, as you put it.
bene vale
Marca Hortensia Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46099 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul of Nova Roma
Salve, Citizens of Nova Roma !

I announced my candidacy for Consul of our Res Publica a few days
ago with the promise to post a full announcement of my intentions
and plans for your consideration of my candidacy for Consul.

I am 49 years old, and I have been a citizen of Nova Roma since the
21st day of the Ianuarius 2755. I am employed as a teacher in the
macro world, teaching government and history in Mediatlantica
Provincia where I also serve as Propraetor.

I am of the Gens Galeria and the Tribus Clustumina.

As I make my continuing journey along the Cursus Honorum I again ask
for your support in this election effort. I have asked for and
received your support five times in the past and I ask for it again.
I have had the honor of serving you as Curator Differium, Quaestor ,
Tribune and a year as a Consular Quaestor to the illustrious Consul
Gaius Popillius Laenas. Full detail can be found here:

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Tiberius_Galerius_Paulinus_%28Nova_Roma%
29"

This year I have had the high honor of serving as Praetor

When I stood for Praetor I said

"I pledge to you to work as diligently as Praetor as I have in the
other magistracies you have entrusted to my care. I will endeavor to
fulfill the constitutional duty to "administer the law ", along with
my, colleague, in a judicial and unbiased manner and will monitor
the main list of Nova Roma in the same way. I will do so without
regard to individuals and will strive to apply the law equally . I
will also endeavor to perform all other duties of my office
according to the best of my abilities and understanding and in
adherence to the Constitution, and laws of Nova Roma."

I believe I have done so.

I believe I have worked as hard as any Praetor in Nova Roman
history. I have enjoyed (almost) every minute of it.

In this campaign for Consul I again pledge to you to work as
diligently as Consul as I have in the other magistracies you have
entrusted to my care.

As to my goals

I will organize a fundraising project that will double as public
promotion for Nova Roma. Working with our Propraetors I would like
to see a series of Roman Movie Festivals held on or near Saturday
April 21, 2007.

We rent, in a number of towns and cities a movie house, college or
university playhouse or other site that can accommodate showing
popular movies with a Roman theme. A Roman dinner could be held in
conjunction with these Roman movie festivals.

The Provincial governors would decide if their event would be a one
day affair or a weekend one. We enlist the help of Roman Reenactors
groups and we work with college Classics departments in promoting
Rome and Nova Roma.

As Consul of Nova Roma I will convene a Nova Roman Conclave for
2007. This will most likely take place in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
This meeting would include a face to face meeting of the Nova Roman
Senate, a general meet and greet of our citizens, a banquet and
other events of a Nova Roma nature.

In addition to the conclave I will work to acquire additional land
for Nova Roma. This additional land would be closer to where our
citizens live so that it could be used for more face to face
meetings. Whatever we build on it can be maintained and watched over
by local citizens. We are working with others right now to bring
this about.

This new land could be used to generate revenue for Nova Roma by
building a Roman fort, holding Roman Day like events and a Roman
summer camp one for adults and one for youths. The Senate will be
appraised each step of the way. This will allow us to raise the
funds necessary to build temples and other building.

I will direct research into the feasibility of starting a general
interest magazine called ROME. Believe it or not there are
scholarly journals on Rome but no general interest magazine like KMT
which is about Ancient Egypt: http://www.egyptology.com/kmt/.

The Magazine, while published by Nova Roma would be Rome centric and
not Nova Roman centric. ROME, the magazine would be a bridge to the
general public and to the academic world.

I would also like to review of our current legislation with an eye
on reducing the number of laws and on insuring that those we have
are posted in the Tabularium in a timely manner and in a way that
clearly states which laws are active and which have lapsed. I will
convene the Senate to work as a "Committee of the Whole" on a
paragraph by paragraph review of the Constitution with the results
submitted for approval by the Citizens of Nova Roma

I have tried to follow a correct path along the Cursus Honorum.
I have served in those offices that the Romans believed gave an
individual the experience needed to be a Consul of Rome. I believe
it was important to do so . There are candidates that have not
followed the Cursus Honorum and as the electorate you must decide
which was the proper avenue of service.

Roman Consuls were generalist not specialist and the magistracies of
the Cursus Honorum were used to gain general experience.
Romans believed that it should be adhered to whenever possible.

I would like to review the Cursus Honorum as it is currently
constituted and introduce some needed changes, like a stead fast
requirement of service ( for a whole term) as Quaestor before one
is eligible for election to any offices including, Censor, Consul,
Praetor, Tribunus Plebis, Curule Aedile, Aedilis Plebis.
While the Roman Cursus Honorum consisted of only four magistracies
the starting point in Rome was the Quaestorship. This needs to be
the rule in Nova Roma as well.

I would further refine our election laws to require service as an
scriba to the Censors before one could stand for Rogator. Similar
requirements might be in order for other posts as well. A minimum of
a year as a citizen should be considered in place of the current 6
months to stand for office.

I will continue to maintain the highest integrity and dedication to
the welfare of Nova Roma and her citizens and I respectfully ask for
your support and your vote.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Mea gloria fideles


I respectfully request this be placed as my statment on the
Elections page of the Wiki.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46100 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul of Nova Roma
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Timothy P. Gallagher" <spqr753@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve, Citizens of Nova Roma !
>
> I announced my candidacy for Consul of our Res Publica a few days

...

> the welfare of Nova Roma and her citizens and I respectfully ask for
> your support and your vote.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Mea gloria fideles
>
>
> I respectfully request this be placed as my statment on the
> Elections page of the Wiki.
>


This has been done.

Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46101 From: cant97@hughes.net Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul of Nova Roma
Best of luck you, Brother Tiberius. I'm sure you'll make our gens proud, as
always.

Vale,

Gaia Galeria Aquilla

-----Original Message-----
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com]On
Behalf Of Timothy P. Gallagher
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 9:21 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul of Nova Roma


Salve, Citizens of Nova Roma !

I announced my candidacy for Consul of our Res Publica a few days
ago with the promise to post a full announcement of my intentions
and plans for your consideration of my candidacy for Consul.

I am 49 years old, and I have been a citizen of Nova Roma since the
21st day of the Ianuarius 2755. I am employed as a teacher in the
macro world, teaching government and history in Mediatlantica
Provincia where I also serve as Propraetor.

I am of the Gens Galeria and the Tribus Clustumina.

As I make my continuing journey along the Cursus Honorum I again ask
for your support in this election effort. I have asked for and
received your support five times in the past and I ask for it again.
I have had the honor of serving you as Curator Differium, Quaestor ,
Tribune and a year as a Consular Quaestor to the illustrious Consul
Gaius Popillius Laenas. Full detail can be found here:

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Tiberius_Galerius_Paulinus_%28Nova_Roma%
29"

This year I have had the high honor of serving as Praetor

When I stood for Praetor I said

"I pledge to you to work as diligently as Praetor as I have in the
other magistracies you have entrusted to my care. I will endeavor to
fulfill the constitutional duty to "administer the law ", along with
my, colleague, in a judicial and unbiased manner and will monitor
the main list of Nova Roma in the same way. I will do so without
regard to individuals and will strive to apply the law equally . I
will also endeavor to perform all other duties of my office
according to the best of my abilities and understanding and in
adherence to the Constitution, and laws of Nova Roma."

I believe I have done so.

I believe I have worked as hard as any Praetor in Nova Roman
history. I have enjoyed (almost) every minute of it.

In this campaign for Consul I again pledge to you to work as
diligently as Consul as I have in the other magistracies you have
entrusted to my care.

As to my goals

I will organize a fundraising project that will double as public
promotion for Nova Roma. Working with our Propraetors I would like
to see a series of Roman Movie Festivals held on or near Saturday
April 21, 2007.

We rent, in a number of towns and cities a movie house, college or
university playhouse or other site that can accommodate showing
popular movies with a Roman theme. A Roman dinner could be held in
conjunction with these Roman movie festivals.

The Provincial governors would decide if their event would be a one
day affair or a weekend one. We enlist the help of Roman Reenactors
groups and we work with college Classics departments in promoting
Rome and Nova Roma.

As Consul of Nova Roma I will convene a Nova Roman Conclave for
2007. This will most likely take place in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
This meeting would include a face to face meeting of the Nova Roman
Senate, a general meet and greet of our citizens, a banquet and
other events of a Nova Roma nature.

In addition to the conclave I will work to acquire additional land
for Nova Roma. This additional land would be closer to where our
citizens live so that it could be used for more face to face
meetings. Whatever we build on it can be maintained and watched over
by local citizens. We are working with others right now to bring
this about.

This new land could be used to generate revenue for Nova Roma by
building a Roman fort, holding Roman Day like events and a Roman
summer camp one for adults and one for youths. The Senate will be
appraised each step of the way. This will allow us to raise the
funds necessary to build temples and other building.

I will direct research into the feasibility of starting a general
interest magazine called ROME. Believe it or not there are
scholarly journals on Rome but no general interest magazine like KMT
which is about Ancient Egypt: http://www.egyptology.com/kmt/.

The Magazine, while published by Nova Roma would be Rome centric and
not Nova Roman centric. ROME, the magazine would be a bridge to the
general public and to the academic world.

I would also like to review of our current legislation with an eye
on reducing the number of laws and on insuring that those we have
are posted in the Tabularium in a timely manner and in a way that
clearly states which laws are active and which have lapsed. I will
convene the Senate to work as a "Committee of the Whole" on a
paragraph by paragraph review of the Constitution with the results
submitted for approval by the Citizens of Nova Roma

I have tried to follow a correct path along the Cursus Honorum.
I have served in those offices that the Romans believed gave an
individual the experience needed to be a Consul of Rome. I believe
it was important to do so . There are candidates that have not
followed the Cursus Honorum and as the electorate you must decide
which was the proper avenue of service.

Roman Consuls were generalist not specialist and the magistracies of
the Cursus Honorum were used to gain general experience.
Romans believed that it should be adhered to whenever possible.

I would like to review the Cursus Honorum as it is currently
constituted and introduce some needed changes, like a stead fast
requirement of service ( for a whole term) as Quaestor before one
is eligible for election to any offices including, Censor, Consul,
Praetor, Tribunus Plebis, Curule Aedile, Aedilis Plebis.
While the Roman Cursus Honorum consisted of only four magistracies
the starting point in Rome was the Quaestorship. This needs to be
the rule in Nova Roma as well.

I would further refine our election laws to require service as an
scriba to the Censors before one could stand for Rogator. Similar
requirements might be in order for other posts as well. A minimum of
a year as a citizen should be considered in place of the current 6
months to stand for office.

I will continue to maintain the highest integrity and dedication to
the welfare of Nova Roma and her citizens and I respectfully ask for
your support and your vote.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Mea gloria fideles

I respectfully request this be placed as my statment on the
Elections page of the Wiki.






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46102 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul of Nova Roma
Salve Gaia Galeria Aquilla

Thanks

No it is the Gens and the people in it that makes me proud.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


----- Original Message -----
From: cant97@...<mailto:cant97@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 9:37 PM
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul of Nova Roma


Best of luck you, Brother Tiberius. I'm sure you'll make our gens proud, as
always.

Vale,

Gaia Galeria Aquilla

-----Original Message-----
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com> [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>]On
Behalf Of Timothy P. Gallagher
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 9:21 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul of Nova Roma

Salve, Citizens of Nova Roma !

I announced my candidacy for Consul of our Res Publica a few days
ago with the promise to post a full announcement of my intentions
and plans for your consideration of my candidacy for Consul.

I am 49 years old, and I have been a citizen of Nova Roma since the
21st day of the Ianuarius 2755. I am employed as a teacher in the
macro world, teaching government and history in Mediatlantica
Provincia where I also serve as Propraetor.

I am of the Gens Galeria and the Tribus Clustumina.

As I make my continuing journey along the Cursus Honorum I again ask
for your support in this election effort. I have asked for and
received your support five times in the past and I ask for it again.
I have had the honor of serving you as Curator Differium, Quaestor ,
Tribune and a year as a Consular Quaestor to the illustrious Consul
Gaius Popillius Laenas. Full detail can be found here:

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Tiberius_Galerius_Paulinus_%28Nova_Roma%<http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Tiberius_Galerius_Paulinus_(Nova_Roma>
29"

This year I have had the high honor of serving as Praetor

When I stood for Praetor I said

"I pledge to you to work as diligently as Praetor as I have in the
other magistracies you have entrusted to my care. I will endeavor to
fulfill the constitutional duty to "administer the law ", along with
my, colleague, in a judicial and unbiased manner and will monitor
the main list of Nova Roma in the same way. I will do so without
regard to individuals and will strive to apply the law equally . I
will also endeavor to perform all other duties of my office
according to the best of my abilities and understanding and in
adherence to the Constitution, and laws of Nova Roma."

I believe I have done so.

I believe I have worked as hard as any Praetor in Nova Roman
history. I have enjoyed (almost) every minute of it.

In this campaign for Consul I again pledge to you to work as
diligently as Consul as I have in the other magistracies you have
entrusted to my care.

As to my goals

I will organize a fundraising project that will double as public
promotion for Nova Roma. Working with our Propraetors I would like
to see a series of Roman Movie Festivals held on or near Saturday
April 21, 2007.

We rent, in a number of towns and cities a movie house, college or
university playhouse or other site that can accommodate showing
popular movies with a Roman theme. A Roman dinner could be held in
conjunction with these Roman movie festivals.

The Provincial governors would decide if their event would be a one
day affair or a weekend one. We enlist the help of Roman Reenactors
groups and we work with college Classics departments in promoting
Rome and Nova Roma.

As Consul of Nova Roma I will convene a Nova Roman Conclave for
2007. This will most likely take place in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
This meeting would include a face to face meeting of the Nova Roman
Senate, a general meet and greet of our citizens, a banquet and
other events of a Nova Roma nature.

In addition to the conclave I will work to acquire additional land
for Nova Roma. This additional land would be closer to where our
citizens live so that it could be used for more face to face
meetings. Whatever we build on it can be maintained and watched over
by local citizens. We are working with others right now to bring
this about.

This new land could be used to generate revenue for Nova Roma by
building a Roman fort, holding Roman Day like events and a Roman
summer camp one for adults and one for youths. The Senate will be
appraised each step of the way. This will allow us to raise the
funds necessary to build temples and other building.

I will direct research into the feasibility of starting a general
interest magazine called ROME. Believe it or not there are
scholarly journals on Rome but no general interest magazine like KMT
which is about Ancient Egypt: http://www.egyptology.com/kmt/.<http://www.egyptology.com/kmt/>

The Magazine, while published by Nova Roma would be Rome centric and
not Nova Roman centric. ROME, the magazine would be a bridge to the
general public and to the academic world.

I would also like to review of our current legislation with an eye
on reducing the number of laws and on insuring that those we have
are posted in the Tabularium in a timely manner and in a way that
clearly states which laws are active and which have lapsed. I will
convene the Senate to work as a "Committee of the Whole" on a
paragraph by paragraph review of the Constitution with the results
submitted for approval by the Citizens of Nova Roma

I have tried to follow a correct path along the Cursus Honorum.
I have served in those offices that the Romans believed gave an
individual the experience needed to be a Consul of Rome. I believe
it was important to do so . There are candidates that have not
followed the Cursus Honorum and as the electorate you must decide
which was the proper avenue of service.

Roman Consuls were generalist not specialist and the magistracies of
the Cursus Honorum were used to gain general experience.
Romans believed that it should be adhered to whenever possible.

I would like to review the Cursus Honorum as it is currently
constituted and introduce some needed changes, like a stead fast
requirement of service ( for a whole term) as Quaestor before one
is eligible for election to any offices including, Censor, Consul,
Praetor, Tribunus Plebis, Curule Aedile, Aedilis Plebis.
While the Roman Cursus Honorum consisted of only four magistracies
the starting point in Rome was the Quaestorship. This needs to be
the rule in Nova Roma as well.

I would further refine our election laws to require service as an
scriba to the Censors before one could stand for Rogator. Similar
requirements might be in order for other posts as well. A minimum of
a year as a citizen should be considered in place of the current 6
months to stand for office.

I will continue to maintain the highest integrity and dedication to
the welfare of Nova Roma and her citizens and I respectfully ask for
your support and your vote.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Mea gloria fideles

I respectfully request this be placed as my statment on the
Elections page of the Wiki.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46103 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Faustus for consul!
Salvete, citizens,

"For a more roman Nova Roma" - If you honour me with your votes, this will
be my goal. As I always defended in the Tribunate and Praetorship.

This single phrase is rich of meanings. It means:

1. Balance to the powers - Comitia, Senate and Magistrates
2. Honouring to the Tribunes and their Sainctatis
3. Respect the many religios and freedom of NR citizens
4. Universalization of Nova Roma by the many provinces.
5. Honour the Senate, making it fullfill its goal - the deposit of wisdow
and long-term planning in NR.
6. Honour the Comitia, as the source of Imperium and ultimate tribunal,
source of all auctoritas on the Republic.
7. Opening space for new citizens raise the cursum honorum and refreshing
the Republic. No personallity cult.
8. Reform whenever necessary to bring us closer to roman system.
9. No-Prejudices in NR
10. Love to the roman gods.

Unfortunately, this takes more than one consulship to accomplish. However, I
will just be happy to be another ´brick in the wall´ on the sucession of
good consules we had years past.

For obeying this goals, I ask special favour of goddess Concordia. Without
her blessings, no sucessfull consulship is possible.


Valete bene in pacem deorum,
L. Arminius Faustus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46104 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2006-10-07
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Salve,

Maior wrote:

>M. Hortensia A. Apollonio sal;
> well I do think the treasury should
>1. subsidize a website for an official online temple to the Capitoline
>triad.
> 2. mint coins & make money
> 3. Go into the lararium business; I want one, I cannot make one;-)
>I'd pay for one.
>
>

You might find it efficacious to look at
http://www.sacredsource.com/prodinfo.asp?number=R-PEN

It's not perfect, but it's better than nothing. And it is already out
there.



>With funds we could organize an American Conventus, perhaps at the
>same time as Pantheacon, which takes place in February in San Jose
>California. Who wouldn't enjoy going to the sunshine in February? Plus
>air fares to California are cheap. The last time I looked it was
>$218.00 from the East Coast round trip.
>
>I'd go & I bet others would too. We just need the will, as you put it.
> bene vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46105 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
M. Lucretius Agricola M. Hortensiae Maiori sal.

I agree that the State would do well to support regional gatherings,
including on such a large scale as you suggest.

I agree that the minting of coins can be a worthwhile project for the
State.

I suggest that citizens could make more use of the wiki for creating
online content. Our wiki is not a mini-Wikipedia, let's think of it
more as a content management system. Every citizen may contribute. The
ground work of an online temple could be started there. I mean things
like research, collections of prayer and so forth. Decisions about
hosting the material elsewhere could be taken later.

I disagree that the State should be in the manufacturing business. I
would hope that some creative citizens might join the ordo equester
and take advantage of our newly refurbished Macellum. It has been
suggested that the State could act as a kind of "bank" to build trust
and security for online transactions. This might be something to pursue.

Our Macellum is at http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Macellum .

optime vale!


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia A. Apollonio sal;
> well I do think the treasury should
> 1. subsidize a website for an official online temple to the Capitoline
> triad.
> 2. mint coins & make money
> 3. Go into the lararium business; I want one, I cannot make one;-)
> I'd pay for one.
>
> With funds we could organize an American Conventus, perhaps at the
> same time as Pantheacon, which takes place in February in San Jose
> California. Who wouldn't enjoy going to the sunshine in February? Plus
> air fares to California are cheap. The last time I looked it was
> $218.00 from the East Coast round trip.
>
> I'd go & I bet others would too. We just need the will, as you put it.
> bene vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46106 From: mike orley Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Salvete!
Salvete Omnes !

I guess my next question should be: if the popular Poet Francesco Sinatra lived, would he have cut a record entitled "Eboracvm, Eboracvum." ?

Vale,
Decimvs Svetonivs Lvpe.

gequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
Cato Ap. Claudio Ciceroni sal.

LOL! True enough, but remember how fond the Romans were of their
circuses!

Vale bene,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Claudio Guzzo"
wrote:
>
> Salve.
> Cato wrote:
> I am Gaius Equitius Cato (call me "Cato") and
> live in the novum caput mundi, Nova Eboracum (NYC).
>
> I don't agree with him: Roma caput mundi est. New York City, recte
Wall Street, is only a circus.
> Vale
> Appius Claudius Cicero
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>







Yahoo! Groups Links












Michael P. Orley

---------------------------------
Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small Business.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46107 From: legio_vi_tribunis Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Things to Consider before voting
Salvette Omne,
As I sit back once again read the the electorial statements, it makes
me think about our glorius history. I weigh our past towards our
future and see potential candidates in a new light. All potential
Consuls have merit, yet one stands out above the rest. I will not sit
here and defame our esteemed candidates, but rather explain how our
future must equal our past. First, let us look at Roma herself. If
the Senate and Consuls had just sat around and rewrote laws and
edicts, would she have conquered the Etruscans? Although Roma fought
only "defensive" wars, she expanded through insight and foresight.
The Senate conceived plans for expansion and ways to integrate people
into the Republic, just as one candidate has stated that he has new
ways of expanding the Nove Roma name to new audiences. Second, how
differently would the Punic wars have been if Scipio Africanus had
started his campaing only to resign, then come back later on. What if
Julius had started in Gaul then returned to Rome, never facing
Vercingetorix? Would the Republic have strected to the northern lands
of Brittania? We need Consuls who will see it through to the end and
not resign. Lastly, we need to look towards increasing our treasury
and securing our future. One candidate not only proposed a Conclave
in 2007, but also the establishment of a Fort and a magazine. The
majority of the candidates have stated that they will revise law and
the legislation of the Republic, which is a noble thing to do. But we
need to do more, we need to see to our future and future generations.
So I encourage all cives to carefully read all the Consul candidates
statements carefully. A careless vote is a vote wasted.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46108 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: post. Non. Oct.
OSD G. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est postridie Nonas Octobris; haec dies fastus aterque est.

"When the envoys had withdrawn, the senate pro- ceeded to discuss the
question. Many of the members realised how the largest and richest
city in Italy, with a very productive country near the sea, could
become the granary of Rome, and supply every variety of provision.
Notwithstanding, however, loyalty to treaties outweighed even these
great advantages, and the consul was authorised by the senate to give
the following reply: 'The senate is of opinion, Campanians, that you
are worthy of our aid, but justice demands that friendship with you
hall be established on such a footing that no older friendship and
alliance is thereby impaired. Therefore we refuse to employ on your
behalf against the Samnites arms which would offend the gods sooner
than they injured men. We shall, as is just and right, send an embassy
to our allies and friends to ask that no hostile violence be offered
you.' Thereupon the leader of the embassy, acting according
to the instructions they had brought with them, said: 'Even though you
are not willing to make a just use of force against brute force and
injustice in defence of what belongs to us, you will at all events
defend what belongs to you. Wherefore we now place under your sway and
jurisdiction, senators, and that of the Roman people, the people of
Campania and the city of Capua, its fields, its sacred temples, all
things human and divine. Henceforth we are prepared to suffer what we
may have to suffer as men who have surrendered themselves into
your hands.' At these words they all burst into tears and stretching
out their hands towards the consul they prostrated themselves on the
floor of the vestibule. The senators were deeply moved by this
instance of the vicissitudes of human fortune, where a people
abounding in wealth, famous for their pride and luxuriousness, and
from whom, shortly before, their neighbours had sought assistance,
were now so broken in spirit that they put themselves and all that
belonged to them under the power and authority of others. It at once
became a matter of honour that men who had formally surrendered
themselves should not be left to their fate, and it was resolved 'that
the Samnite nation would commit a wrongful act if they attacked a city
and territory which had by surrender become the possession of Rome.'
They determined to lose no time in despatching envoys to the Samnites.
Their instructions were to lay before them the request of the
Campanians, the reply which the senate, mindful of their friendly
relations with the Samnites, had given, and lastly the surrender which
had been made. They were to request the Samnites, in virtue of the
friendship and alliance which existed between them, to spare those who
had made a surrender of themselves and to take no hostile action
against that territory which had become the possession of the Roman
people. If these mild remonstrances proved ineffective, they were to
solemnly warn the Samnites in the name of the senate and people of
Rome to keep their hands off the city of Capua and the territory
of Campania.

The envoys delivered their instructions in the national council of
Samnium. The reply they received was couched in such defiant terms
that not only did the Samnites declare their intention of pursuing the
war against Capua, but their magistrates went outside the council
chamber and, in tones loud enough for the envoys to bear, ordered the
prefects of cohorts to march at once into the Campanian territory and
ravage it." - Livy, History of Rome 7.31


On this day in ancient Greece, the Athenians celebrated the return of
King Theseus after his defeat of King Minos of Crete, who up until
then had enjoyed naval supremacy in the Mediterranean. Upon reaching
shore, the hungry Athenians immediately boiled beans and ate all their
remaining rations, it having apparently been a long voyage back. The
Athenians did likewise on this day, singing a thanksgiving for the end
of hunger. An olive branch, wreathed in white wool and hung with
fruits, is carried in procession by two young men representing the
disguised hostages. Being harvest time, this festival merged
with the Festival of Grape Boughs, and thanks are given both to
Dionysius, the god of wine, and to Athene, who guided Theseus to
victory over Crete. Fourteen mothers join the procession, representing
the fourteen hostages who were rescued when Theseus slew the king, the
so-called "Bull of Minos."

There is some confusion about Theseus' parentage, some say he is the
son of Aegeus and Aethra, and others the son of Poseidon and Aethra.
Apollodoros and Hyginus say Aethra waded out to Sphairia after
sleeping with Aegeus, and lay there with Poseidon. The next day,
Aegeus, who had been visiting Aethra at Troizen, left for his home
city of Athens. As he left, he left sandals and a sword under a large
rock; should Aethra bear a male child, she was to send him to Athens
to claim his birthright as soon as he was old enough to lift the rock
and retrieve the items.

Aethra gave birth to Theseus, who came of age and set off for Athens
with the sword and sandals, encountering and defeating six murderous
adversaries along the way. When Theseus reached Athens, Medea, the
wife of Aegeus, persuaded Aegeus to kill the as of yet unrecognized
Theseus by having him attempt to capture the savage Marathonian Bull.
Theseus does the unexpected and succeeds, so Medea tells Aegeus to
give him poisoned wine. Aegeus recognizes Theseus' sword as he is
about to drink and knocks the goblet from his lips at the last
second.

According to Plutarch and Philochoros, on the way to Marathon to kill
the bull, Theseus encounters a fierce storm and seeks shelter in the
hut of an old woman named Hecale. She promises to make a sacrifice to
Zeus if Theseus comes back successful. He comes back, finds her dead,
and builds a deme in her name. Some time after Theseus return to
Athens, trouble stirs and blood flows between the houses of Aegeus in
Athens and Minos, his brother in Crete. War and drought ensues and an
oracle demands that recompense be made to Minos. Minos demands
that seven maidens and seven youths are to be sacrificed to the
Minotaur every nine years. Theseus is among the chosen victims and
sails off to Crete, promising to Aegeus that his ship's black flag
would be replaced with a white flag if Theseus is victorious. In
Crete, Minos molests one of the maidens and Theseus becomes angry and
challenges him, boasting of his parentage by Poseidon. Minos, son of
Zeus is amused and asks Theseus to prove his heritage by retrieving a
ring from the depths of the ocean. Theseus being a son of Poseidon
succeeds.

Ariadne, a young woman in Crete already betrothed to Dionysus, falls
in love with Theseus and helps him defeat the Minotaur. Ariadne then
leaves Crete with Theseus, who abandons her on Dia (at Athena's
behest, according to Pherekydes). On returning to Athens Theseus
forgets to switch the black sail with the white one. Aegeus,
consequently, watching from afar believes his son is dead and hurls
himself into the sea, now known as the "Aegean", in his honor.


Valete bene!


Cato




SOURCES


Livy, Theseus (http://www.pantheon.org/articles/t/theseus.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46109 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Salvete!
Cato D. Svetonio Lupo sal.

Well, it should be "Nova Eboracum, Nova Eboracum" :-)

Vale bene,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, mike orley <clannadh@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes !
>
> I guess my next question should be: if the popular Poet Francesco
Sinatra lived, would he have cut a record entitled "Eboracvm,
Eboracvum." ?
>
> Vale,
> Decimvs Svetonivs Lvpe.
>
> gequitiuscato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46110 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: CPT: Extension of Period to Declare Candidacy
Salvete Quirites

Thus far we have had three Plebeians declare their candidacies for
Tribunus Plebis:

C. Arminius Reccanullus
Q. Servilius Priscus
M. Curiatus Complutensis

We have also had one candidate declare for the office of Aedilis
Plebis:

C. Curius Saturninus

We still need at least two more candidates for Tribunus Plebis and one
more for Aedilis Plebis. I have therefore decided to extend the period
for which Plebeian may announce there candidacies until the end of
Tuesday 10 October (11:59 PM CET).

The following day, 11 October, is Meditrinalia, followed by the
Fontinalia, Ludi Capitolini, and Armilustrum through 19 October. I
hope that everyone may enjoy their holidays. A tentative date for
holding the elections has not yet been set by the Tribuni Plebis, but
these will likely be held before the end of the month, followed by a
second call for the Comitia Plebis Tributa to assemble after the
Nones of November in which to pass a plebisctum de consecratione for
our designated officers.

Valete optime
M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
Tribunus Plebis.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46111 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Salve,

Excuse-me, Sejanus, but the romans had writen and have rewritten many times
their laws. If we see the History of Early Republic on Livius, we see new
laws and reforming of the old ones always went in parallel with the
conquests, and answering the new threatens Rome sufferes.

Recall many episodes : the Plebeians fleeing to Sacred Mount. If there
weren´t the Sacred Law making the Tribunate, never ever the romans would
have a so strong army like they had, since the population would split in
two.

Recall the conquest of Veius and the sack of Rome: If the consules hadn´t
stated a law forbidden the romans to abandon their houses on Rome to go to
Veius, Rome would have split as well.

Recall the right of Apelatio, the best law ever passed by the glorious
Publicola that really get yhe confidence of the citizens on the newly born
Republic.

Recall the law that allowed marriage between the orders, recall the law that
allowed plebeians to consulship. Recall the twelve tables, the romans
written it to have written laws for all, not the gentilic tradition. But
even the own Twelve tables legislation were changed many times.

A careful reading of History shows the laws are made by necessity. And NR
still hasn´t developed itself. I think so naive some people saying ´much
laws´ in NR...

And History is the biggest of the sciences, the great teacher of NR...

I agree with you. The consul Faustus will have the foresight to see the
needs of NR and the needs of growing it. Throught a responsible consulship
and careful management of our system to become more and more the mirror of
the system that caused the glory of Ancient Rome. The system Polybios said
waas the merging of the three political perfect system of Aristotles.

And Nova Roma will glory by its merits.

Vote Faustus for consul!

Vale bene in pacem deorum,
L. Arminius Faustus


FAUSTUS FOR CONSUL!
MORE ROMAN NOVA ROMA!


2006/10/8, legio_vi_tribunis <marcus.sejanus@...>:
>
> Salvette Omne,
> As I sit back once again read the the electorial statements, it makes
> me think about our glorius history. I weigh our past towards our
> future and see potential candidates in a new light. All potential
> Consuls have merit, yet one stands out above the rest. I will not sit
> here and defame our esteemed candidates, but rather explain how our
> future must equal our past. First, let us look at Roma herself. If
> the Senate and Consuls had just sat around and rewrote laws and
> edicts, would she have conquered the Etruscans? Although Roma fought
> only "defensive" wars, she expanded through insight and foresight.
> The Senate conceived plans for expansion and ways to integrate people
> into the Republic, just as one candidate has stated that he has new
> ways of expanding the Nove Roma name to new audiences. Second, how
> differently would the Punic wars have been if Scipio Africanus had
> started his campaing only to resign, then come back later on. What if
> Julius had started in Gaul then returned to Rome, never facing
> Vercingetorix? Would the Republic have strected to the northern lands
> of Brittania? We need Consuls who will see it through to the end and
> not resign. Lastly, we need to look towards increasing our treasury
> and securing our future. One candidate not only proposed a Conclave
> in 2007, but also the establishment of a Fort and a magazine. The
> majority of the candidates have stated that they will revise law and
> the legislation of the Republic, which is a noble thing to do. But we
> need to do more, we need to see to our future and future generations.
> So I encourage all cives to carefully read all the Consul candidates
> statements carefully. A careless vote is a vote wasted.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46112 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Salve Luci Armini,


> Excuse-me, Sejanus, but the romans had writen and have rewritten many times
> their laws...
>
> Recall the law that allowed marriage between the orders, recall the law that
> allowed plebeians to consulship. Recall the twelve tables, the romans
> written it to have written laws for all, not the gentilic tradition. But
> even the own Twelve tables legislation were changed many times.
>
> A careful reading of History shows the laws are made by necessity. And NR
> still hasn´t developed itself. I think so naive some people saying ´much
> laws´ in NR...

Those examples are from a society of tens of thousands, over hundreds of years.

We're a few hundred, and we've been in existance for eight years. And we're
not growing in numbers anymore, because the effort put into endless cycles of
making and revising laws has far eclipsed that put into any other activity.

We need to clean house. This upcoming consulship will be a failure unless,
at its finish, there are *fewer* and *shorter* laws than before.

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46113 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Salve Honored Censor Marcus Octavius Gracchus

"We need to clean house. This upcoming consulship will be a failure unless,
at its finish, there are *fewer* and *shorter* laws than before."

I could not agree more!

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Candidate for Consul



----- Original Message -----
From: Matt Hucke<mailto:hucke@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 11:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Things to Consider before voting


Salve Luci Armini,

> Excuse-me, Sejanus, but the romans had writen and have rewritten many times
> their laws...
>
> Recall the law that allowed marriage between the orders, recall the law that
> allowed plebeians to consulship. Recall the twelve tables, the romans
> written it to have written laws for all, not the gentilic tradition. But
> even the own Twelve tables legislation were changed many times.
>
> A careful reading of History shows the laws are made by necessity. And NR
> still hasn´t developed itself. I think so naive some people saying ´much
> laws´ in NR...

Those examples are from a society of tens of thousands, over hundreds of years.

We're a few hundred, and we've been in existance for eight years. And we're
not growing in numbers anymore, because the effort put into endless cycles of
making and revising laws has far eclipsed that put into any other activity.

We need to clean house. This upcoming consulship will be a failure unless,
at its finish, there are *fewer* and *shorter* laws than before.

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@...<mailto:octavius@...> * http://www.graveyards.com<http://www.graveyards.com/>

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@...<mailto:octavius@...> * http://www.graveyards.com<http://www.graveyards.com/>

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46114 From: legio_vi_tribunis Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Things to Consider
Salve Honorable Faustus,
With all you stated in that rebuttal on things to consider, I do agree
with you on the revision of law and legislation. I fully understand
the need for that, but I also understand the need to have a stronger
real world tie. After reading your statement of candidacy, I see that
you never stated any real world events or ties to bring in more people
other than that of being the first Latin American Consul. I have seen
that both Flavius Germanicus and Tiberius Paulinus have state truly
visionary ideas on how to grow our nation and attract more people. I
am not here to discredit you, but as an assidui I need to know that
the future of NR is in strong hands. Both Flavius and Paulinus will
not only work the legislative side, but they will also endeavor to
reach out to new people. How spelndid would it be to have a
functioning roman outpost for the real world to see, or the
opportunity for Nova Romans to speak face to face in a real world
conclave? Those are the ideas and concepts that NR needs to expand
its future. As stated before, I am not here to discredit you, but we
all need consuls who will lead us into a new day and not just rehash
last years events.

Marcus Pontius Sejanus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46115 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Stephen Gallagher wrote:

> "We need to clean house. This upcoming consulship will be a failure unless,
> at its finish, there are *fewer* and *shorter* laws than before."
>
> I could not agree more!

How many leges do we even have? How many of these are still in
effect? Does anyone know, or can anyone know, without devoting
dozens of hours to study of the tabularium?

The old tabularium (http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/) lists
one hundred and one laws! And this doesn't include anything from
last year or this year (when it was replaced by the new system).
Nor does it include Senatus Consulta, Edicts, or any of the hundreds
of provincial decrees.

More than one hundred and one laws - for an organisation with 232
active members.

These laws have driven away some of our best citizens. Consider
Lucius Marius Fimbria, one of our most enthusiastic early members,
who left after a law was specifically written to prevent him
from using his chosen name. Consider Caius Minucius Scaevola,
who simply walked away when a silly slander lawsuit was filed
against him for ordinary rhetoric common on any mailing list.
(For that matter, consider his antagonist in that battle, who
hasn't been seen here since he lost his case.)

Then consider Appius Claudius Priscus, who mass-mailed three
hundred citizens repeatedly with offensive racist and sexist
drivel - but we couldn't get rid of him. The consuls and
censores could do almost nothing to rid this republic of a
known menace, because of the enormous burden of laws that
we are forced to work under. He left only because we wore
him down with dozens of small actions. A community that
cannot purge itself of a malicious individual is not
a healthy community.

More than one hundred and one laws.

Is it any wonder we haven't grown in numbers for years?

Valete, M. Octavius Gracchus.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46116 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: C. Curium Saturninum Aedilem Plebis Oro Vos Faciatis!
Salvete omnes,

Vote for me for the Plebeian Aedileship!

I'm C. Curius Saturninus. Many of you know me already and know about
the numerous posts I have had in NR. I have been a scriba and an
accensus for many magistrates over the years, including 5 Curule
Aediles and 2 Plebeian Aediles, so I know how the Aedileship works in
NR. I have also been a Questor and Tribunus Plebis and I'm currently
the Propraetor of Thule province.

I have studied, and am currently studying, Cultural History, Latin,
Ancient Greek, Classical Archaeology, General History and Social
Sciences in the universities of Turku and Helsinki. My main subject
is Cultural History with specialisation to ancient period. I have
also studied visual arts and I own a small advertising agency. I'm
also the rector of Academia Thules. I'm married to senator Emilia
Curia Finnica and we have a little boy, Marcus Curius Saturninus.

But enough about me. I would like to discuss the office I'm
candidating, the Plebeian Aedileship. Even while Plebeian Aediles are
not very often in the spotlight of Nova Roman publicity, it was a
very important magistracy historically. I have little wish for any
drastic polarisation between plebs and patricians in NR, but also as
reluctantly would I like to forget the historical significance of
this social division in the ancient Rome.

In NR Plebeian Aediles are responsible for two festivals, not too
great a burden for anyone to arrange, and also have the same power
over the "real public facilities" that the state owns, and festivals
and gatherings, as Curule Aediles. The way I see it is that besides
arranging festivals, currently the office of Plebeian Aedile is more
symbolical in NR nowadays. As such I really don't have any special
electorial platform or program I wish to accomplish.

Still I would like to use this opportunity to bring about a couple of
thoughts of mine concerning the Plebeian Aediles and Aediles in
general. Both concern the following chapter of our constitution: "To
issue those edicta (edicts) necessary to see to the conduct of public
games and other festivals and gatherings, to ensure order at public
religious events, to see to the maintenance of any real public
facilities that the state should acquire, and to administer the law
(such edicts being binding upon themselves as well as others)."

First thing I would like to discuss is the "conduct of gatherings" as
the constitution puts it. For me it seems like the idea has been that
the aediles are more or less responsible for organising any
gatherings there are, real and virtual. However, to my knowledge,
this is not happening in any way currently: the aediles are not
arranging any gatherings. I would certainly feel it rather difficult
to arrange a gathering across the Atlantic for example (and I
certainly wouldn't be able to attend one), so this part of the duties
of the Aediles doesn't seem very practical to me. I understand very
well the need for real life events and gatherings, but I'm not sure
if the Aediles are the right persons to arrange them. Aediles could
of course supervise things, but so could e.g. provincial governors do
also. What I would like to see discussed is that should Aediles be
active in this sort of things, and if so, in what role. I personally
see it a possible, but not the only possible, way of trying to get
more live and virtual gatherings into NR.

Second thing is about those real public facilities. To my knowledge
NR has some real public facilities currently: a piece of land in the
middle of nowhere, website and some Yahoo lists. The piece of land
has no use and I doubt if it'll ever have. The question of website is
a bit more complicated since what NR actually owns there is not very
clear. Obviously, we don't own the server and we are only renting the
disk space. It could be argued that we own the domain, but it's too
in certain ways a rented one. Still, I think there is room for
discussion about making the Aediles responsible for the website
somehow. I don't know which would be the best way to do it, but what
comes first to my mind is to have the Aediles in a similar position
as the editors-in-chief are in the magazines, i.e. making sure that
there are enough resources to keep things up-to-date and generally be
responsible for the contents of the website. The relationship with
the webmaster of course is something that needs to be discussed, too,
if anything of this sort would be done. For me the most logical
solution would be to let the webmaster to be a kind of chief
technician responsible for the technical aspects of the website and
Aediles to be responsible for the contents. The discussion also could
be broadened to give Aediles in NR in general a role for being
responsible for content, visual outlook and other of public relations
matters in NR. So, for example, the Aediles could be made responsible
for producing PR material for NR. As above with gatherings, I think
there is room for discussion of this matter, too, and many possible
solutions.

I think that, if Aediles would be made responsible for public
relations and NR image, it could increase the concentrated efforts of
NR to find new citizens and to have more real life activities as well
as to sharpen our public image and message. There seems to be a
constant lack of this sort of coordination of activities in NR, and I
think the current constitution mandates the Aediles actually to be
responsible for such things. What do you think?

Valete,

C. Curius Saturninus

Propraetor Provinciae Thules
Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org
gsm: +358-50-3315279
fax: +358-9-8754751





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46117 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
A. Apollonius C. Equitio sal.

>
For my part, one of the first things I would like to proceed with if elected is my proposal for an Aedilician Fund. <

Ah! Indeed, this is very much the sort of thing I had in mind, and it would be lovely if the successful consular and aedilician candidates could take it further. But I'm not sure how you as praetor would be able to implement it yourself, especially since the lex constitutiva unhistorically prevents the praetores from legislating except when there are no consules (i.e. almost never).






___________________________________________________________
All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46118 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Cato M. Octavio Graccho sal.

You wrote:

"...the effort put into endless cycles of making and revising laws has
far eclipsed that put into any other activity."

With all due respect, you seem to have forgotten:

the podcast
the ludi
the new coin

just to name three. And you realize, of course, that the very process
of making our laws "shorter" and "fewer" requires the passage of...new
laws. Go figure.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46119 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: F. Galerius Aurelianus
A. Apollonius Fl. Galerio sal.

> I take the personal view that the Pontifex Maximus is the leader of the
sacred colleges in the absence of the rex et regina sacrorum. <

I agree with that view.

> It is my opinion
that if I swear an oath not to run for an office and it is later determined
that it is in the best interests of the Republic that I should run, only the
highest authority in relation to the sacred colleges can release me from my
oath. This is not written down anywhere in the legislation of the sacred

colleges or legislation of Nova Roma. It simply represents my personal viewpoint.
<

I know it isn't written in any legislation, but I thought you might have a historical source for it. You see, as far as I know, no public priest, not even the rex sacrorum or the pontifex maximus, had any power to release private citizens from oaths; but if I'm wrong, I would like to know it! ;)

> I take my oath very seriously. <

Quite rightly so. I wouldn't suggest otherwise.





___________________________________________________________
The all-new Yahoo! Mail goes wherever you go - free your email address from your Internet provider. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46120 From: Maior Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
M. Hortensia Fl. Vedio spd;
I know about Sacred Source & their wares, 'better than
nothing' is a pretty low level of expectation.
I would hope our next consul would have bigger vision than
the status quo.
And you never replied to my idea of a regional U.S. gathering -
again that speaks volumes about you as consul.
vale
Marca Hortensia Maior

> >
>
> You might find it efficacious to look at
> http://www.sacredsource.com/prodinfo.asp?number=R-PEN
>
> It's not perfect, but it's better than nothing. And it is already
out
> there.
>
>
>
> >With funds we could organize an American Conventus, perhaps at
the
> >same time as Pantheacon, which takes place in February in San
Jose
> >California. Who wouldn't enjoy going to the sunshine in February?
Plus
> >air fares to California are cheap. The last time I looked it was
> >$218.00 from the East Coast round trip.
> >
> >I'd go & I bet others would too. We just need the will, as you
put it.
> > bene vale
> > Marca Hortensia Maior
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46121 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
In a message dated 10/7/2006 5:17:03 PM Pacific Standard Time,
rory12001@... writes:
With funds we could organize an American Conventus, perhaps at the
same time as Pantheacon, which takes place in February in San Jose
California. Who wouldn't enjoy going to the sunshine in February? Plus
air fares to California are cheap. The last time I looked it was
$218.00 from the East Coast round trip.
Obviously you haven't flown recently. And Northern Ca hotels are not cheap.
Unless you want to stay in the poor district.
We are also having an El Nino this winter, so I think you'd be luckly to see
sunshine in Feb. You'll likely get rain.

I've always wondered why we cannot find a central location in the US to hold
a gathering.
Best bet would be Las Vegas, because of its many hotels, followed by St Louis
because
of its proximity.

Q. Fabius Maximus
ProConsul California


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46122 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
>
> "...the effort put into endless cycles of making and revising laws has
> far eclipsed that put into any other activity."
>
> With all due respect, you seem to have forgotten:
>
> the podcast
> the ludi
> the new coin

I respect those efforts and would like to see more like them - but
believe that more time has been expended on pointless lawmaking
and the voting, web work, and debate that are brought about as
its result.

Vale, Octavius.

--
hucke@...
http://www.graveyards.com

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46123 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
A. Apollonius M. Moravio sal.

Many thanks for your thoughtful reply. It sounds, in general, like you see the role of the consul in these projects as one of coordinating, encouraging, and supervising: in short, making other people do things. Is that about right?

There are a few specific points I'd like to ask about.

> With few exceptions, the Consules have not been able to take
an active role in managing the Proconsules and Propraetores, and even
where they could, it has not been throughout all of Nova Roma.
<

What do you think has prevented consules from doing this, and how will you be able to succeed where previous consules have not?

> [The lex Fabia] made it the responsibility of
individual Citizens to form such communities. Instead of considering
rewriting the law, or trying to come up with a new law, I think that
next year's Consules will have to find new ways to impliment this
law. The first thing of course will be to set up guidelines for such
local communities. With the Census 2007 we will then gain
information on where they might be formed. The Consules should
actively work with Propraetores and with individual Citizens to get
local members to meet one another and encourage them to form a local
community.
<

I think I understand what you're saying, but I'd just like to check. When you say "guidelines for such local communities", what does this mean? The lex Fabia already goes into some detail about how oppida and municipia should be organized: is there any need for further detail?

> The reorganization of provicia has been discussed
by a few magistrates over the past two years. This will have to be
addressed before the Senate, but again I do not think the process
will require new laws to impliment a plan. What is envisioned is
that Proconsules and Propraetores will be assigned to oversee oppidi
and municipi more on a regional basis. This will mean that some of
our provincia will be reduced in size to facilitate local
organization by having provincia become a collection of local
communities. At the same time, the number of Proconsules and
Propraetores needed to manage the system may be reduced by placing
them over individual local communities and over what we now
provinciae. <

This really puzzles me. You want to reduce the size of provinciae *and* reduce the number of governors? How is that possible? Surely if provinces are smaller then there will be more of them, and therefore more governors?

> That income barely covers our current organizational
needs, and does not provide seed money for additional activities that
we would like to promote. <

I don't really understand this. Last time I looked at the budget, administrative costs accounted for a small fraction of annual income. The rest was put into various long-term funds. These can't accurately be called "organizational needs" - we don't *need* an endowment fund, for example, it's just something we choose to have; similarly the Magna Mater project. We could choose to do something different with some or all of this money. I'm not saying we should, but we could, and as consul you would have to make some choices about this. Are you saying you would not consider redirecting any current revenue to the sort of projects you mentioned and would only spend money on such things if revenue increased?

> If they do so, as
a nonprofit organization we can seek grant money to fund some of our
projects. This has already been suggested, and attempted with the
Magna Mater Project. But I think we could also look towards smaller
projects, of not so lengthy a duration, that might also qualify for
grants.
<

I'm very encouraged to hear you say that. How do you envisage people applying for these grants?




___________________________________________________________
The all-new Yahoo! Mail goes wherever you go - free your email address from your Internet provider. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46124 From: legio_vi_tribunis Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Consul Candidates
Salve,
I would to to expand on what honorable Octavius and Tiberius have
already stated. The need for laws is essential, yes, but we must
expand on that. I have only seen two candidates who expressed to true
wish not to sit around and just revise the law. A good Consul with
work both on the law and in the real world. So I urge all once again
to read the Consul candidates statements before voting. We stand at
the cusp of something great, and if we choose poorly, then we repeat
the same pattern.

Vale,
Marcus Sejanus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46125 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: C. Curium Saturninum Aedilem Plebis Oro Vos Faciatis!
A. Apollonius C. Curio sal.

You've made some very interesting points about the aedilitas plebis. I hope you don't mind me responding, as briefly as I can.

> First thing I would like to discuss is the "conduct of gatherings" as
the constitution puts it. For me it seems like the idea has been that
the aediles are more or less responsible for organising any
gatherings there are, real and virtual. However, to my knowledge,
this is not happening in any way currently: the aediles are not
arranging any gatherings. <

I don't think this is the correct interpretation of the lex constitutiva. Being responsible for the conduct of gatherings is very different from being responsible for the organization of gatherings. The lex constitutiva makes the aediles responsible for the way in which gatherings are conducted once those gatherings have actually begun: it does not make them responsible for making those gatherings happen in the first place.

> What I would like to see discussed is that should Aediles be
active in this sort of things, and if so, in what role. I personally
see it a possible, but not the only possible, way of trying to get
more live and virtual gatherings into NR.
<

I think you're right that the aediles are the wrong people to organize gatherings. I'd suggest that their role should be to facilitate gatherings. The aediles curules already do this to some extent, in that they preside over the process by which provinces bid to host the Conventus. C. Equitius has suggested another thing they could do, which is to help governors get money from the treasury to help organize and fund gatherings. I certainly think there should be some easy way for governors to apply for such financial support. At the moment a governor has to persuade the consules to present a motion to the senate, and then the senate has to vote: this is a long and cumbersome process and really not worth bothering with if all one needs is a contribution toward the cost of a meal for ten or something like that. This would be solved, as Cato suggests, by allowing the aediles to run a find of their own from which they could make payments without consulting the senate every time, while still allowing the senate to supervise.

> Still, I think there is room for
discussion about making the Aediles responsible for the website
somehow. I don't know which would be the best way to do it, but what
comes first to my mind is to have the Aediles in a similar position
as the editors-in-chief are in the magazines, i.e. making sure that
there are enough resources to keep things up-to-date and generally be
responsible for the contents of the website. The relationship with
the webmaster of course is something that needs to be discussed, too,
if anything of this sort would be done. For me the most logical
solution would be to let the webmaster to be a kind of chief
technician responsible for the technical aspects of the website and
Aediles to be responsible for the contents. The discussion also could
be broadened to give Aediles in NR in general a role for being
responsible for content, visual outlook and other of public relations
matters in NR. So, for example, the Aediles could be made responsible
for producing PR material for NR. As above with gatherings, I think
there is room for discussion of this matter, too, and many possible
solutions.
<

It's worth discussing, but I think there's a real danger here of expanding the duties of the aediles far beyond their proper historical role. There is no historical basis at all for making the aediles responsible for public relations or anything like that. As for the website, that's an interesting suggestion. I suppose you're thinking of this as equivalent to the aediles' ancient function of keeping public buildings and public spaces clean and in good repair. It's certainly a plausible analogy. Something to think about, indeed.

> I think that, if Aediles would be made responsible for public
relations and NR image, it could increase the concentrated efforts of
NR to find new citizens and to have more real life activities as well
as to sharpen our public image and message. There seems to be a
constant lack of this sort of coordination of activities in NR, and I
think the current constitution mandates the Aediles actually to be
responsible for such things. What do you think?
<

I really don't think the lex constitutiva contains any such requirement. We have to draw a distinction between, on the one hand, the maintenance of public spaces and facilities and, on the other hand, image and presentation to outsiders. It's true that "public spaces" and "public image" both contain the word "public", but the meaning is entirely different. Public spaces and public facilities are those spaces and facilities used by members of our community. They are internal matters. The historical duties of the aediles were all concerned with making the economic and social life of the community function smoothly by maintaining the spaces and buildings where that life took place. They were not in the tiniest bit concerned with how the republic presented itself to, or interacted with, outsiders. This is an entirely different sense of the word "public". It is equivalent to things like diplomacy and international relations, and these things are in the remit of the senate, the higher magistrates, and the fetiales. Recruiting new citizens, publicizing Nova Roma, and things like that have nothing to do with the aediles and should not have anything to do with the aediles. The aediles were, and are, and should be, responsible for internal matters within the community, not outside.







___________________________________________________________
All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46126 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Salve,

Maior wrote:

>M. Hortensia Fl. Vedio spd;
> I know about Sacred Source & their wares, 'better than
>nothing' is a pretty low level of expectation.
> I would hope our next consul would have bigger vision than
>the status quo.
> And you never replied to my idea of a regional U.S. gathering -
>again that speaks volumes about you as consul.
> vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>

One tries to be helpful, and this is the inevitable response from some
quarters. You say you want one, you'd pay for one, and I tell you where
you can find one, and I am accused of a lack of vision. *sigh*

To your specific point, I would rather have Nova Roma empower a dozen
craftsmen, giving them the knowledge, the market, and the audience to
make and sell lararia, rather than have the Republic itself "go into the
lararium business." We have provisions for an Ordo Equestor for a
reason, and that is precisely it. Or would you have us empanel yet
another new magistrate in charge of our lararium business, to operate
under yet another set of laws regulating their form, his production
output, distribution deadlines and so forth? Far better we put lararia
in the hands of those who practice the Religio, and support our own
craftspeople in the process.

But if you would rather wait for an "Official" Nova Roman Lararium (tm),
that is, of course, your prerogative. I personally find something better
than nothing. If we had waited until we had perfection in 1998, Nova
Roma would still be nothing more than an idea today, waiting for its
birth until it was absolutely perfect in form and implementation. But it
takes more than ideas to launch such enterprises, be they something as
humble as an online lararium business or something as audacious as the
restoration of the Roman Republic. It takes... vision.

As far as your idea of a U.S. Conventus, I did not remark upon it
because I find it unremarkable. I would rather see a hundred small
gatherings that spring up organically, than one large one decreed from
above. And certainly picking a venue for such a thing is a premature
thing to do at best. For that matter, we have two de facto candidates
for an American Conventus already; Roman Days in Maryland (at which Nova
Roma has maintained a presence since our inception) and Roman Market
Days up in Maine, which is a purely Nova Roman event.

But I must ask. Why does something have to be declared THE official
gathering?

Let us have a hundred, nay a thousand, local groups, constantly meeting,
planning, learning, worshipping, building, selling, displaying,
dramatizing, etc. etc. etc. If done properly, with the right amount of
support from the central and provincial governments, and the right
amount of getting-out-of-the-way, you will see a natural process whereby
some events become large and treasured annual get-togethers. It is the
nature of things. And the ones which will truly see success are not
going to be the ones that are decreed from on high as being The One.
Starwood (one of the largest pagan gatherings in North America) grew
from 185 people 25 years ago to more than 1,500 today. Could anyone have
predicted that Starwood, of all the pagan gatherings going on in the
early 1980's, would be one of the few that caught on and became
world-famous? Of course not.

Before we start to worry about The Big One, let's get a bunch of the
little ones off the ground.

Vale,

Flavius Vedius Germanicus
Pater Patriae
Consular
Senator

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Flavius_Vedius_Germanicus_(Election_MMDCCLIX)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46127 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Things to Consider about candidates for Consul.
F. Galerius Aurelianus M. Pontio Sejano. Salve.

I do not understand how anyone can believe that Vedius Germanicus will be
able to serve Nova Roma effectively. He has twice resigned sacred offices,
magistracies, and his citizenship. He backed away from returning to his duties
as an augur when there was a question of his seniority in the Sacred College
of Augurs. I cannot recall any occasion on the ML where he was mentioned as
participating in a real world Roman event in the last three years. I can
find no examples, of any sort, in the last three years in which Vedius
Germanicus has done anything to further the expansion of Nova Roma or the Sacra et
Religio either on the internet or in the real world. I respect him for helping
to found Nova Roma and insuring the survival of our model republic as
Dictator but I do not have any confidence in his ability or vision as a candidate
for consul.
I believe that if F. Vedius Germanicus wishes to demonstrate his willingness
to serve Nova Roma and its expansion, he should take up a position, such as
a regio praefect in his home province for a year. If he can expand the
citizenship, the tax base, and public events and keep his oath of office, I would
acccept him as a viable candidate for consul in the future. However, there
is nothing in his actions over the last three years that demonstrates he is
politically or personally reliable.
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus has never resigned from any office he has been
elected to and was willing to step down for one year after he served as
praetor. He stepped up only when it was clear that Nova Roma lacked enough
candidates. He has faced some serious challenges and obstacles during his offices.
He has been willing to compromise on occasion but he has made some mistakes,
in my opinion, that could have been avoided. While he is not a follower of
the Sacra et Religio Romana, he has always shown that he is willing to honor
Dii Immortales. As Praetor, he reintroduced the historically correct practice
of sponsoring the Ludi Apollonaires and worked with the aediles to hold a
successful event.
Finally, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus has never, ever broken his oath of
office or his personal oath, to the best of my knowledge.

Vadite in pace Cereris.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46128 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Events
What the matter with holding an event in a place with camping or rustic
cabins, Maximo? It would be far less expensive for many of the citizens.
However, I would suggest that instead of attempting a major meeting of all the
American provinces, we consider holding local events in conjunction with Italian
cultural faires, existing pagan festivals, and museum events and then, move
up to interprovincial events.

Aureliane


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46129 From: Maior Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
M.Hortensia Q. Fabio spd;
actually I thought Pantheacon would be a natural as it is the big
pagan gathering. I think it's about $645.00
But I agree with you that Las Vegas would be excellent; everyone
is worshipping Fortuna! Didn't a civis just post that he works at
Harrah's; what is his name? This is ideal. Let's do it.
bene vale
Marca Hortensia Maior

ps. St. Louis -no one really wants to go there,we're better off with
a fun location.


> With funds we could organize an American Conventus, perhaps at the
> same time as Pantheacon, which takes place in February in San Jose
> California. Who wouldn't enjoy going to the sunshine in February?
Plus
> air fares to California are cheap. The last time I looked it was
> $218.00 from the East Coast round trip.
> Obviously you haven't flown recently. And Northern Ca hotels are
not cheap.
> Unless you want to stay in the poor district.
> We are also having an El Nino this winter, so I think you'd be
luckly to see
> sunshine in Feb. You'll likely get rain.
>
> I've always wondered why we cannot find a central location in the
US to hold
> a gathering.
> Best bet would be Las Vegas, because of its many hotels, followed
by St Louis
> because
> of its proximity.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
> ProConsul California
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46130 From: Maior Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Faustus for consul!
M. Hortensia Maior quiritibus spd;
L. Arminius Faustus was my gens brother before I was given
the honour of reviving Gens Hortensia. I cannot imagine a better
candidate for Consul.
Faustus is a Latin speaker, classicist, worshipper of the
gods, a true lover of Roma Antiqua. He has the knowledge, to lead
Nova Roma into a truly more Roman direction.
He is also a civis of Provincia Brasilia a very lively
province in NR. Please let's elect magistrates with the know-how &
have a truly international view of Nova Roma.
Lucius Arminius Faustus embodies the Roman virtues ; he is
would be an ideal consul!
bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior, aedilis plebis
producer "Vox Romana"




In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Arminius Faustus"
<lafaustus@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete, citizens,
>
> "For a more roman Nova Roma" - If you honour me with your votes,
this will
> be my goal. As I always defended in the Tribunate and Praetorship.
>
> This single phrase is rich of meanings. It means:
>
> 1. Balance to the powers - Comitia, Senate and Magistrates
> 2. Honouring to the Tribunes and their Sainctatis
> 3. Respect the many religios and freedom of NR citizens
> 4. Universalization of Nova Roma by the many provinces.
> 5. Honour the Senate, making it fullfill its goal - the deposit of
wisdow
> and long-term planning in NR.
> 6. Honour the Comitia, as the source of Imperium and ultimate
tribunal,
> source of all auctoritas on the Republic.
> 7. Opening space for new citizens raise the cursum honorum and
refreshing
> the Republic. No personallity cult.
> 8. Reform whenever necessary to bring us closer to roman system.
> 9. No-Prejudices in NR
> 10. Love to the roman gods.
>
> Unfortunately, this takes more than one consulship to accomplish.
However, I
> will just be happy to be another ´brick in the wall´ on the
sucession of
> good consules we had years past.
>
> For obeying this goals, I ask special favour of goddess Concordia.
Without
> her blessings, no sucessfull consulship is possible.
>
>
> Valete bene in pacem deorum,
> L. Arminius Faustus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46131 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Salve,

Everyone could always come to Wichita, KS instead of St. Louie :-) Of
course going to "Caesars Palace" would be a perfect setting.

Vale,
Quintus Servilius Priscus

Maior wrote:
> M.Hortensia Q. Fabio spd;
> actually I thought Pantheacon would be a natural as it is the big
> pagan gathering. I think it's about $645.00
> But I agree with you that Las Vegas would be excellent; everyone
> is worshipping Fortuna! Didn't a civis just post that he works at
> Harrah's; what is his name? This is ideal. Let's do it.
> bene vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
> ps. St. Louis -no one really wants to go there,we're better off with
> a fun location.
>
>
>
>> With funds we could organize an American Conventus, perhaps at the
>> same time as Pantheacon, which takes place in February in San Jose
>> California. Who wouldn't enjoy going to the sunshine in February?
>>
> Plus
>
>> air fares to California are cheap. The last time I looked it was
>> $218.00 from the East Coast round trip.
>> Obviously you haven't flown recently. And Northern Ca hotels are
>>
> not cheap.
>
>> Unless you want to stay in the poor district.
>> We are also having an El Nino this winter, so I think you'd be
>>
> luckly to see
>
>> sunshine in Feb. You'll likely get rain.
>>
>> I've always wondered why we cannot find a central location in the
>>
> US to hold
>
>> a gathering.
>> Best bet would be Las Vegas, because of its many hotels, followed
>>
> by St Louis
>
>> because
>> of its proximity.
>>
>> Q. Fabius Maximus
>> ProConsul California
>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46132 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Cato Octavio sal.

Octavius, I understand what you are saying; I would, however, ask you
to consider this: what exactly would you remove from the tabularium?
What law or laws do you see as unnecessary? With what would you
replace the tabularium? To some, I know that the seemingly endless
rounds of debates that surround our approach to the tabularium are
useless squabbling and a waste of time. I make two comments on that
line of thought:

1. There is, for an apparent number of us, an enjoyment in seeing and
being involved in the creation and development of our own government.
The creation of a functioning legal and political community is not
just a matter of giving people neat names and titles and then just
assuming that everything will just roll along happily without another
care in the world. This is not, to my mind, just another on-line chat
group. Nor do I want it to be. It is something more, something
deeper, a call for each of us; the response to which is to create a
real, living and breathing Republic. And the Republic after which we
model ourselves left a legal and political legacy which has endured
for almost three thousand years. To dismiss that legacy because we do
not have a community numbering in the millions is defeatist; our own
citizenry stretches now beyond any physical and social boundaries
imaginable to the ancient Romans. Yes, we have an "active" community
of only a few hundred; but we have over one thousand subscribers to
this Forum alone, and who knows how many thousands see our Wiki pages
and home web page? If, and I repeat IF, we are to be taken seriously
on any level, we must show the hallmarks of a serious endeavor. We
claim to be attempting a restoration of the Roman Republic. A Roman
Republic without law - and a set of laws that encompasses all kinds of
interactions - is ludicrous. And creating that law, defining it in
terms that both respect the great legal tradition of the ancient Roman
Republic and acknowledge the intervening centuries of social,
technological, and psychological advance, takes time and effort and
yes, a whole bunch of arguing. We are carrying on a great tradition.

2. I forget what my second comment was.

Vale bene,

Cato



> I respect those efforts and would like to see more like them - but
> believe that more time has been expended on pointless lawmaking
> and the voting, web work, and debate that are brought about as
> its result.
>
> Vale, Octavius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46133 From: Maior Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
M. Hortensia M. Octavio Graccho spd;
you make a fine point. We should get rid of the
Constitution & return as much as possible to the ways Romans
legislated during the Republic. It wouldn't be that difficult & we
are developing a real mos.
Let's return to the past to build an authentic
Nova Roman future.
bene vale
Marca Hortensia Maior
>
> On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > "We need to clean house. This upcoming consulship will be a
failure unless,
> > at its finish, there are *fewer* and *shorter* laws than before."
> >
> > I could not agree more!
>
> How many leges do we even have? How many of these are still in
> effect? Does anyone know, or can anyone know, without devoting
> dozens of hours to study of the tabularium?
>
> The old tabularium (http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/) lists
> one hundred and one laws! And this doesn't include anything from
> last year or this year (when it was replaced by the new system).
> Nor does it include Senatus Consulta, Edicts, or any of the
hundreds
> of provincial decrees.
>
> More than one hundred and one laws - for an organisation with 232
> active members.
>
> These laws have driven away some of our best citizens. Consider
> Lucius Marius Fimbria, one of our most enthusiastic early members,
> who left after a law was specifically written to prevent him
> from using his chosen name. Consider Caius Minucius Scaevola,
> who simply walked away when a silly slander lawsuit was filed
> against him for ordinary rhetoric common on any mailing list.
> (For that matter, consider his antagonist in that battle, who
> hasn't been seen here since he lost his case.)
>
> Then consider Appius Claudius Priscus, who mass-mailed three
> hundred citizens repeatedly with offensive racist and sexist
> drivel - but we couldn't get rid of him. The consuls and
> censores could do almost nothing to rid this republic of a
> known menace, because of the enormous burden of laws that
> we are forced to work under. He left only because we wore
> him down with dozens of small actions. A community that
> cannot purge itself of a malicious individual is not
> a healthy community.
>
> More than one hundred and one laws.
>
> Is it any wonder we haven't grown in numbers for years?
>
> Valete, M. Octavius Gracchus.
>
> --
> hucke@...
> http://www.graveyards.com
>
> "What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
> clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
> over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46134 From: Maior Date: 2006-10-08
Subject: Re: Events
--M. Hortensia Galerio Aureliano spd;
(vocative of Maximus is Maxime) Because if I wanted to camp
out I could go to Roman Days with the Legios. Las Vegas at least is
a fun destination & truly Roman in many ways.

As for local events. You, to your credit as propraetor, are indeed e
having one in my province - only it is in Atlanta, Georgia. I live
in central, North Carolina, for me to fly to Atlanta, stay the night
etc.costs lots of $..I'd rather have a big fun holiday in Las Vegas
or at least Pantheacon.

America is as big as all of Europe. We're spread out. Meeting, 2 or
3 isn't the same as getting together for a big fun time with a ton
of other Nova Romans. I had a splendid time in New York and there
must have been 15 of us.

I'm going to the next Conventus in Merida. Why? Because I'll be
meeting people I consider my friends, see ruins & meet tons of other
Nova Romans. It's a great incentive.
bene vale
Marca Hortensia Maior
(it helps if you sign with your full name so the person knows how to
address you.I'm sorry but I've forgotten your prenomen.)

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:
>
> What the matter with holding an event in a place with camping or
rustic
> cabins, Maximo? It would be far less expensive for many of the
citizens.
> However, I would suggest that instead of attempting a major
meeting of all the
> American provinces, we consider holding local events in
conjunction with Italian
> cultural faires, existing pagan festivals, and museum events and
then, move
> up to interprovincial events.
>
> Aureliane
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46135 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Events
F. Galerius Aurelianus Marca Hortensia Maior. Salve.

There have been public functions in Austrorientalis before I became
propraetor and now. As of yet, no citizens in N. Carolina or S. Carolina have made
any suggestions about holding an event in those state or in connection with
any other organizational events. I continue to hear about how difficult it is
to hold functions in other provinces because of distance and low population
density. Austrorientalis has about 88 citizens but we held the Neptunalia
with about 14 people in attendance; six NR citizens plus family members and
friends. If citizens which to go to Vegas and party among the casinos, I have
nothing against it. However, I find a greater enjoyment in celebrating Roman
festivals with my fellow citizens within the province.
Are there any pagan festivals or public events in your state that Nova Roma
could be a part of so we could get some attention & new members? Do you need
some assistance on researching events in your area?
I became Propraetor to expand Nova Roma in the physical world and have had
some success. My sister, Violentilla, has constructed, consecrated, and
dedicated (with the assistance of Metellus Pontifex, myself, and others) a
physical templum to Neptunus Equestor that anyone can visit by contacting her. The
dedication was based on a traditional formula to allow anyone to sacrifice
there for any reason. Stone altars to the Penates, the Manes, Dii Immortales,
and Neptunus have been erected. My sister has sworn to erect altars to Diana
and Faunus at future festivals. I cannot think of anything that is more
traditionally Roman than that. We visited, ate, and drank many cups of wine to
Neptunus to celebrate His festival.
Soon we will celebrate the Saturnalia in December followed, in February, by
public celebration of the Lupercalia (held last year), Parentalia and Cara
Cognatio (with the Galeria and other NRomans who have become our cousins). Our
province will continue to celebrate, teach, and enjoy Roman culture by
doing. As a citizen of our province, you should help, aid, and assist us to bring
Nova Roma to the real world. I look forward to your participation in our
efforts.

Vadite in pace Cereris.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46136 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Venator scripsit...
Valetudo quod fortuna omnes;

In the upcoming elections, I will support those who will:

1. Decrease the number of laws
2. Increase the spirit of justice
3. Encourage Nova Roman cives, and others, to meet face-to-face
4. Wisely husband our monetary resources for growth

I have been a citizen of Nova Roma since July of 1998 CE; number 78 to
be exact. I believe that I am among the few dozen still "here" of
that number. There are many who have gone that I miss.

I do not worship the Capitaline Trio and Their cohorts. I do worship
the Holy Powers of the Germanii.

I look upon the practitioners of the Religio Romana as Cousins Germane
within the larger "Indo-European" family. I look to Nova Roma as a
place where the Religio is not just protected, but is nurtured.

I look upon Nova Roma as a people/place whose heart is big enough to
welcome men and women of many faiths; in support of and with respect
for the Religio.

Unlike many of my co-religionists (amongst others) I care if Nova Roma succeeds.

Our Res Publica is just over 8 years old.

If She were a human child, She'd be just finishing up the "Brownie"
Girl Scout program and entering the "Junior" GS level.

Young entities, natural born and artificial, make mistakes; it's all
part of the learning process.

Nova Roma has built and presented a lovely cart.

But, the horse has not yet been born.

Let us use this coming year to polish the cart; also breed, birth,
rear and train the horse.

A few sesterces - Venator, World's Biggest Hope-er
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46137 From: legio_vi_tribunis Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Events, for the Record
Salve,
Just for the record to my esteemed Nova Romans, I happen to live in
Las Vegas and actual work for Harrahs Entertainment, and on any given
week I spend 3 or more days at the Palace deep in the catacombs. As
to Tiberius concept of a conclave in Vegas, well he has my support.

Marcus Sejanus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46138 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Announcement for Quaestor
Salvete quirites,

I had intended to take a year off from public service, but we seem to
have a shortage of candidates. Thus I have convinced my dear wife to
reluctantly agree to me offering my services to the Republic next year
as a Quaestor.

My qualifications: I've been a Curule Aedile and a Consul. In those
offices I've had quaestors assigned to me. I've also worked with
praetorian quaestors on praetorian staffs. I know what quaestors have to
do. I'm a physicist with more formal mathematics training than most
mathematicians. I can certainly handle the math required to keep accounts.

I'm currently a Censor and a Senator. I'm also a Lictor of the Comitia
Curiata, and an officer of several sodalities. I've been in Nova Roma
for over five years. I actually wouldn't run for the quaestorship if
there were people who weren't as overqualified for the job as I am
standing. But there aren't. So here I am. I hope my example will
inspire some of my fellow senators to step forward and take up the
responsibilities of the minor magestracies for which we as of yet lack
candidates.

Valete,

Gn. Equitius Marinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46139 From: Maior Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Events
-M. Hortensia F Galerio Aureliano spd;
I think you are doing a splendid job. I have just lived
here a year. I was the propraetrix of Hibernia with 1 meeting to my
credit. And the present prop. whom I know went to the Conventus in
Britannia.
I did join the Duke pagans but they fizzled out & I'm sorry
to say the local druids are not for me ...I hopt to recruit members
for "Vox Romana" podcast from the local classics dept and that is
how I hope to recruit and also via my alumni organization.
When I go to New York city I always try to get in touch
with local Nova Romans to get together. It can just be sharing a
meal & a glass of wine, but that is also great.
You and your sister Violentilla are fine examples of
just what can be done.
bene vale
Marca Hortensia Maior

> F. Galerius Aurelianus Marca Hortensia Maior. Salve.
>
> There have been public functions in Austrorientalis before I
became
> propraetor and now. As of yet, no citizens in N. Carolina or S.
Carolina have made
> any suggestions about holding an event in those state or in
connection with
> any other organizational events. I continue to hear about how
difficult it is
> to hold functions in other provinces because of distance and low
population
> density. Austrorientalis has about 88 citizens but we held the
Neptunalia
> with about 14 people in attendance; six NR citizens plus family
members and
> friends. If citizens which to go to Vegas and party among the
casinos, I have
> nothing against it. However, I find a greater enjoyment in
celebrating Roman
> festivals with my fellow citizens within the province.
> Are there any pagan festivals or public events in your state that
Nova Roma
> could be a part of so we could get some attention & new members?
Do you need
> some assistance on researching events in your area?
> I became Propraetor to expand Nova Roma in the physical world and
have had
> some success. My sister, Violentilla, has constructed,
consecrated, and
> dedicated (with the assistance of Metellus Pontifex, myself, and
others) a
> physical templum to Neptunus Equestor that anyone can visit by
contacting her. The
> dedication was based on a traditional formula to allow anyone to
sacrifice
> there for any reason. Stone altars to the Penates, the Manes,
Dii Immortales,
> and Neptunus have been erected. My sister has sworn to erect
altars to Diana
> and Faunus at future festivals. I cannot think of anything that
is more
> traditionally Roman than that. We visited, ate, and drank many
cups of wine to
> Neptunus to celebrate His festival.
> Soon we will celebrate the Saturnalia in December followed, in
February, by
> public celebration of the Lupercalia (held last year), Parentalia
and Cara
> Cognatio (with the Galeria and other NRomans who have become our
cousins). Our
> province will continue to celebrate, teach, and enjoy Roman
culture by
> doing. As a citizen of our province, you should help, aid, and
assist us to bring
> Nova Roma to the real world. I look forward to your
participation in our
> efforts.
>
> Vadite in pace Cereris.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46140 From: Maior Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Events, for the Record
Hortensia Marce Sejane spd;
many thanks for posting, I sent a copy to myself so I shan't
forget you. This is just the thing Maximus or our next consul should
do. Nova Roma needs an American Conventus!
I think I can worship Fortuna, drink some wine & put on my
toga & maybe watch some legionairies;-) Amici this would put us on the
map. We could make it a yearly meeting; people would take their
vacations there, spouses would happily acquiesce..
bene vale in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "legio_vi_tribunis"
<marcus.sejanus@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
> Just for the record to my esteemed Nova Romans, I happen to live in
> Las Vegas and actual work for Harrahs Entertainment, and on any given
> week I spend 3 or more days at the Palace deep in the catacombs. As
> to Tiberius concept of a conclave in Vegas, well he has my support.
>
> Marcus Sejanus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46141 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Events
In a message dated 10/8/2006 2:32:54 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... writes:

What the matter with holding an event in a place with camping or rustic
cabins, Maximo? It would be far less expensive for many of the citizens.
However, I would suggest that instead of attempting a major meeting of all
the
American provinces, we consider holding local events in conjunction with
Italian
cultural faires, existing pagan festivals, and museum events and then, move
up to interprovincial events.



Actually its Maxime. I don't mind rustic events, but we seem to have
problems getting civvies to any event. When the Getty reopened the Santa Monica
Roman Villa I tried to organize a field trip there. I had one interested
civvie from San Diego. I ended going by myself non togate.

San Diego Nat. Hist Museum will have 22 of the dead sea scrolls on exhibit
next year.
That might be worth a look see.

Q. Fabius Maximus



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46142 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: a.d. VII Id. Oct.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem VII Idus Octobris; haec dies comitialis est.

"When the envoys had withdrawn, the senate proceeded to discuss the
question. Many of the members realised how the largest and richest
city in Italy, with a very productive country near the sea, could
become the granary of Rome, and supply every variety of provision.
Notwithstanding, however, loyalty to treaties outweighed even these
great advantages, and the consul was authorised by the senate to give
the following reply: "The senate is of opinion, Campanians, that you
are worthy of our aid, but justice demands that friendship with you
shall be established on such a footing that no older friendship and
alliance is thereby impaired. Therefore we refuse to employ on your
behalf against the Samnites arms which would offend the gods sooner
than they injured men. We shall, as is just and right, send an embassy
to our allies and friends to ask that no hostile violence be offered
you." Thereupon the leader of the embassy, acting according to the
instructions they had brought with them, said: "Even though you are
not willing to make a just use of force against brute force and
injustice in defence of what belongs to us, you will at all events
defend what belongs to you. Wherefore we now place under your sway and
jurisdiction, senators, and that of the Roman people, the people of
Campania and the city of Capua, its fields, its sacred temples, all
things human and divine. Henceforth we are prepared to suffer what we
may have to suffer as men who have surrendered themselves into your
hands." At these words they all burst into tears and stretching out
their hands towards the consul they prostrated themselves on the floor
of the vestibule.

The senators were deeply moved by this instance of the vicissitudes of
human fortune, where a people abounding in wealth, famous for their
pride and luxuriousness, and from whom, shortly before, their
neighbours had sought assistance, were now so broken in spirit that
they put themselves and all that belonged to them under the power and
authority of others. It at once became a matter of honour that men who
had formally surrendered themselves should not be left to their fate,
and it was resolved "that the Samnite nation would commit a wrongful
act if they attacked a city and territory which had by surrender
become the possession of Rome." They determined to lose no time in
despatching envoys to the Samnites. Their instructions were to lay
before them the request of the Campanians, the reply which the senate,
mindful of their friendly relations with the Samnites, had given, and
lastly the surrender which had been made. They were to request the
Samnites, in virtue of the friendship and alliance which existed
between them, to spare those who had made a surrender of themselves
and to take no hostile action against that territory which had become
the possession of the Roman people. If these mild remonstrances proved
ineffective, they were to solemnly warn the Samnites in the name of
the senate and people of Rome to keep their hands off the city of
Capua and the territory of Campania. The envoys delivered their
instructions in the national council of Samnium. The reply they
received was couched in such defiant terms that not only did the
Samnites declare their intention of pursuing the war against Capua,
but their magistrates went outside the council chamber and, in tones
loud enough for the envoys to hear, ordered the prefects of cohorts to
march at once into the Campanian territory and ravage it." - Livy,
History of Rome 7.31


Today is dedicated to the goddess Felicitas. Felicitas is the Roman
goddess of good luck, to whom a temple was first built in the mid-2nd
century B.C. She became the special protector of successful
commanders. Caesar planned to erect another temple to her, and it was
built by the triumvir M. Aemilius Lepidus. The emperors made her
prominent as symbolizing the blessings of the imperial regime.
Felicitas is usually holding a caduceus and a cornucopia, symbols of
health and wealth.

109 Felicitas is a dark and fairly large main belt asteroid,
discovered by C. H. F. Peters on October 9, 1869 and named after the
goddess.


"I built the following structures: The Senate House, and the
Chalcidicum (Records Office) adjoining it; the Temple of Apollo on the
Palatine Hill, with its porticoes..." - Augustus, "Works of Augustus"
19 (A.D.13)

On this day in 28 B,C., Augustus dedicated the Temple of Apollo.


Valete bene!

Cato


SOURCES

Livy, Felicitas (Felicitas." Encyclopædia Britannica{2005}), Augustus,
Wikipedia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46143 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Cato A Apollonio Sal.

Salve Corde.

According to the lex Constitutiva, the praetors have the power to

"To issue those edicta (edicts) necessary to engage in those tasks
which advance the mission and function of Nova Roma and to administer
the law (such edicts being binding upon themselves as well as others)"
(lex Const. IV.A.3.b)

A praetorial edict creating the Aedilician Fund could certainly be
construed as advancing the "mission and function of Nova Roma", could
it not?

It is true that the Senate controls the aerarium (the Treasury) and
has the authority to "oversee the financial endeavors, health, and
policy of the state" (lex Const. V.A), but "oversee" does not imply
"create" or "restrict", especially as the proposed Aedilician Fund
would not be composed of monies from the Treasury of the State.

Vale bene,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@...> wrote:
>
>
> A. Apollonius C. Equitio sal.
>
> Ah! Indeed, this is very much the sort of thing I had in mind, and
it would be lovely if the successful consular and aedilician
candidates could take it further. But I'm not sure how you as praetor
would be able to implement it yourself, especially since the lex
constitutiva unhistorically prevents the praetores from legislating
except when there are no consules (i.e. almost never).
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity
and ease of use." - PC Magazine
> http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46144 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Salvete Quirites omnes

Can we take a sober look at some of the ideas being discussed?

First, in regard to certain projects that have been mentioned, they
have come about by few individuals working as teams. That is the
case with the podcast, the ludi, the production of coins. We can
also include the production of the Aquila, the revamping of the
website, the formation of sodalitates, and the Conventus. The Magna
Mater Project entails an effort of greater scope in which Nova Roma
takes on a supportive role to others. There, Nova Roma is to provide
promotion and fundraising for the restoration of the Palatine site.
The MMP, just within Nova Roma, is composed of small teams performing
different aspects of the project.

Secondly, in regard to holding events like the Conventus anywhere in
North or South America, wherever such would be held, you would need a
local team of dedicated individuals to host it. We might do better
trying to host events within smaller regions. However, if you look
at the size of some of the provinciae in North America, they are
already regional - some more than others - and there has not been
much success in the past eight years of holding gatherings even on a
provincial level.

With regard to Nova Roma's laws, any thought of codifying,
condensing, revamping the many laws into something coherent and
easily usable, would again take a team of dedicated and knowledgeable
individuals to do the major portion of the work. I suggested such an
approach and helped to guide the effort when SVR rewrote its Regulae
in an effort that would be comparable to Nova Roma totally rewriting
its Constitution. It would prove a greater effort in Nova Roma, I
think, because there are so many additional laws here, and more
diverse perspectives in Nova Roma on what the law should provide.

The sobering factor is that we have less than 300 active members who
are scattered throughout the world. They are active on very
different levels. Among these are those who are active in the sense
that they have paid taxes - the assidui. In addition are some capite
censi who, although they do not pay taxes, do participate in list
discussions, in our sodalitates, vote, and would attend local
gatherings assuming that one was held nearby. These "active" capite
censi are really few in numeber compared to all we count as cives of
Nova Roma. And we might include others as well, those who subscribe
to our lists or who use our website frequently, so that the total
number of individuals worldwide that Nova Roma reaches is maybe
1,500. However, when you really get down to it and look at who is
involved in the various teams that Nova Roma has working, we see the
same individuals. A bare handful of fifty people really, at times
more perhaps, but never approaching a hundred, and all of them
scattered throughout the world. Their efforts are divided into
different projects, in different areas of responsibilities as they
hold various offices, as well as have their attention brought into
list activities, so that not a great deal is being accomplished from
year to year.

Discussion on holding events is due to the desire and need of people
to have personal contact in ways that can only be provided by meeting
face to face. Holding a regional conventus offers some temporary
satisfaction, but we need a more personal approach on the lowest
levels to build up Nova Roma. It will have to be done on an oppidium
by oppdium basis initially. If we shifted our focus over to
supporting individuals to form oppidi, keeping them active, joining
one opidium with another on occasion, then the growth and stability
of Nova Roma would follow. We would increase our tax base. We would
increase the number of teams available to work on a variety of
projects. We would have oppidi interacting with other groups or with
individual members of other groups. We would have real world events
hosted locally by an oppidium that could be used to recruit new
members. And an important factor in all of this would be the social
bonds created in an oppidium, growing into a municipium, and then
linking with others to form its respective provinca. That would give
Nova Roma a solid basis on which to grow. All of the other ideas I
have seen discussed can develop out of it, but until Nova Roma has a
solid bsis and a means to further actual growth it is only to remain
as it is, an online community that is little more than a discussion
group.

Valete optime
M Moravius Piscinus






--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > "...the effort put into endless cycles of making and revising
laws has
> > far eclipsed that put into any other activity."
> >
> > With all due respect, you seem to have forgotten:
> >
> > the podcast
> > the ludi
> > the new coin
>
> I respect those efforts and would like to see more like them - but
> believe that more time has been expended on pointless lawmaking
> and the voting, web work, and debate that are brought about as
> its result.
>
> Vale, Octavius.
>
> --
> hucke@...
> http://www.graveyards.com
>
> "What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
> clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
> over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46145 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
SALVE CATO !

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
> According to the lex Constitutiva, the praetors have the power to
> "To issue those edicta (edicts) necessary to engage in those tasks
> which advance the mission and function of Nova Roma and to
administer the law (such edicts being binding upon themselves as
well as others)"
> (lex Const. IV.A.3.b)
>
> A praetorial edict creating the Aedilician Fund could certainly be
> construed as advancing the "mission and function of Nova Roma",
could it not? >>>

Try to imagine what is happen if any magistrate putting in front of
his action " mission and function of NR " will issue edicts with
different proposals. Bassed by a magistrate proposal, that is the
Senate job. This is the proper way to keep order.

> It is true that the Senate controls the aerarium (the Treasury) and
> has the authority to "oversee the financial endeavors, health, and
> policy of the state" (lex Const. V.A), but "oversee" does not imply
> "create" or "restrict", especially as the proposed Aedilician Fund
> would not be composed of monies from the Treasury of the State.>>>

Yes, but the decision is still the Senate job. We talking about a
state decision. Why state decision ? Because the NR name is involved
and the repercurssions are to the NR, too.
Aedilician Fund is an individual proposal ( sustained by many,
including me ). It need the state approval.
It's different when I and you, as private citizens, will create a
fund for our own discretion.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46146 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Announcement for Quaestor
SALVE EQUITE MARINE !

A nice example.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
Salvete quirites,

......offering my services to the Republic next year as a Quaestor.




Recent Activity

14
New Members

1
New Photos

Visit Your Group
SPONSORED LINKS

Roman empire coin
Ancient history
Citizenship test
Nova
Fall of the roman empire

New Message Search
Find the message you want faster. Visit your group to try out the improved message search.




Share feedback on the new changes to Groups



.







NOVI ROMANI !
Add the new logo and link for the Magna Mater Project support page to your websites.
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/draft.htm

"Every individual is the arhitect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46147 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Cato Iulio Sabino sal.

Salve Sabine!

You bring up an interesting point. Magistrates are elected precisely
because the citizens feel that they hold the necessary qualifications,
both tangible and intangible, to fulfill their expectations - there is
the assumption that the People are confident that the individuals
elected to fill magistracies can do so, and the People grant them (the
magistrates) various powers and authority to do so. Now imagine that
these elected magistrates proceed to issue edicta in compliance with
the lex Constitutiva, to "advance the mission and function" of Nova Roma.

This already happens, and the Senate has nothing to do with it. You
and I, as curule aediles, have issued a series of edicta concerning
the running of the Macellum, the celebrations of the ludi, &c.,
exactly as we should have in order to fulfill our obligations and
duties under the law. It was entirely unnecessary to consult the
Senate before issuing these edicts simply because the People, not the
Senate, is the source of the authority by which we are enabled to
issue such edicts.

You are entirely correct in one way - it would certainly be possible
for me to create the Gaius Equitius Cato Fund For Helping Citizens Do
Things, and it could function privately. But the goal of the proposed
Fund is much more important than any single individual; I think it
entirely within the scope of praetorial authority to issue such an
edict which, like many others, could be continued by those who
followed in the praetorship, year after year.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46148 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR OCTOBER 9, 2006
Salvete omnes,

The Senate is called to order jointly for October 9, 2006 (2759) by
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, Consul, and Pompeia Minucia Stabo,
Consul.There are five constitutional amendments under
consideration. There will be 96 hours of discussion, followed by 96
hours of voting. Discussion shall end on Thursday October 12th,
followed by voting which shall end on Monday October 16th Rome time.

The Senate is asked to consider the following constitutional
amendments. The purpose of the first four amendments is to bridge
the language of some of our leges with the constitution in terms of
citizens' rights, to provide more specific language of provocatio
and other appeals proceedings relative to comitia, to lend more
weight to the nota language and to reconcile the role of comitia in
judicial proceedings. The last constitutional amendment is the
Religio reform proposal sent to the senate for discussion back in
April by Senator Cn. Salvius Astur. The Religio reform proposal,
known here as Lex Fabia de Quattuor Collegiis Summis Sacerdotalibus,
was approved by the Collegium Pontificum back in July.

These amendments are to be voted on in segments, so that the
Senators are not obligated to vote for an entire 'package' of
amendments.


The amendments adopted by this august body shall be presented to the
Comitia Centuriata for their approval. At this time appropriate
nomenclature shall be assigned to the first four amendments.


The complete text of the constitution may be found here, for your
convenience:


http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Current_constitution_%28Nova_Roma%29


Valete:

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus

Tribunis Plebis

Senator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46149 From: m.vipsanius Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Events
This would be a great idea. I have participated in many 1861 civil
war events and they have done wonders for furthering the cause of
knowledge.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:
>
> What the matter with holding an event in a place with camping or
rustic
> cabins, Maximo? It would be far less expensive for many of the
citizens.
> However, I would suggest that instead of attempting a major
meeting of all the
> American provinces, we consider holding local events in
conjunction with Italian
> cultural faires, existing pagan festivals, and museum events and
then, move
> up to interprovincial events.
>
> Aureliane
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46150 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Salvete omnes,

I would say that M Moravius Piscinus has hit the nail on the head in
his missive below and I agree with his observations 100%.
We are not unique; other clubs and societies I have belonged to over
the years always have just a small handful of core people forever
running them year after year through thick and thin. Hundreds come
and go just occasionaly attending the festivities but not wanting to
be active. Still things get done, the clubs grow little by little
and there are times some feel like pulling the plug but they keep
pushing on just the same since all the years of time and effort are
efforts not that easy to dispose of on a lark or particular bad day.

My wife,Vibia Lucretia has a more stoic attitude about members and
friends. Like her mom said, they are like the feathers on a
chicken's back - some grow, fall out but always new ones come in.


Regards,

QSP


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@...>
wrote:
>
> Salvete Quirites omnes
>
> Can we take a sober look at some of the ideas being discussed?
>
> First, in regard to certain projects that have been mentioned,
they
> have come about by few individuals working as teams. That is the
> case with the podcast, the ludi, the production of coins. We can
> also include the production of the Aquila, the revamping of the
> website, the formation of sodalitates, and the Conventus. The
Magna
> Mater Project entails an effort of greater scope in which Nova
Roma
> takes on a supportive role to others. There, Nova Roma is to
provide
> promotion and fundraising for the restoration of the Palatine
site.
> The MMP, just within Nova Roma, is composed of small teams
performing
> different aspects of the project.
>
> Secondly, in regard to holding events like the Conventus anywhere
in
> North or South America, wherever such would be held, you would
need a
> local team of dedicated individuals to host it. We might do
better
> trying to host events within smaller regions. However, if you
look
> at the size of some of the provinciae in North America, they are
> already regional - some more than others - and there has not been
> much success in the past eight years of holding gatherings even on
a
> provincial level.
>
> With regard to Nova Roma's laws, any thought of codifying,
> condensing, revamping the many laws into something coherent and
> easily usable, would again take a team of dedicated and
knowledgeable
> individuals to do the major portion of the work. I suggested such
an
> approach and helped to guide the effort when SVR rewrote its
Regulae
> in an effort that would be comparable to Nova Roma totally
rewriting
> its Constitution. It would prove a greater effort in Nova Roma, I
> think, because there are so many additional laws here, and more
> diverse perspectives in Nova Roma on what the law should provide.
>
> The sobering factor is that we have less than 300 active members
who
> are scattered throughout the world. They are active on very
> different levels. Among these are those who are active in the
sense
> that they have paid taxes - the assidui. In addition are some
capite
> censi who, although they do not pay taxes, do participate in list
> discussions, in our sodalitates, vote, and would attend local
> gatherings assuming that one was held nearby. These "active"
capite
> censi are really few in numeber compared to all we count as cives
of
> Nova Roma. And we might include others as well, those who
subscribe
> to our lists or who use our website frequently, so that the total
> number of individuals worldwide that Nova Roma reaches is maybe
> 1,500. However, when you really get down to it and look at who is
> involved in the various teams that Nova Roma has working, we see
the
> same individuals. A bare handful of fifty people really, at times
> more perhaps, but never approaching a hundred, and all of them
> scattered throughout the world. Their efforts are divided into
> different projects, in different areas of responsibilities as they
> hold various offices, as well as have their attention brought into
> list activities, so that not a great deal is being accomplished
from
> year to year.
>
> Discussion on holding events is due to the desire and need of
people
> to have personal contact in ways that can only be provided by
meeting
> face to face. Holding a regional conventus offers some temporary
> satisfaction, but we need a more personal approach on the lowest
> levels to build up Nova Roma. It will have to be done on an
oppidium
> by oppdium basis initially. If we shifted our focus over to
> supporting individuals to form oppidi, keeping them active,
joining
> one opidium with another on occasion, then the growth and
stability
> of Nova Roma would follow. We would increase our tax base. We
would
> increase the number of teams available to work on a variety of
> projects. We would have oppidi interacting with other groups or
with
> individual members of other groups. We would have real world
events
> hosted locally by an oppidium that could be used to recruit new
> members. And an important factor in all of this would be the
social
> bonds created in an oppidium, growing into a municipium, and then
> linking with others to form its respective provinca. That would
give
> Nova Roma a solid basis on which to grow. All of the other ideas
I
> have seen discussed can develop out of it, but until Nova Roma has
a
> solid bsis and a means to further actual growth it is only to
remain
> as it is, an online community that is little more than a
discussion
> group.
>
> Valete optime
> M Moravius Piscinus
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Matt Hucke <hucke@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > "...the effort put into endless cycles of making and revising
> laws has
> > > far eclipsed that put into any other activity."
> > >
> > > With all due respect, you seem to have forgotten:
> > >
> > > the podcast
> > > the ludi
> > > the new coin
> >
> > I respect those efforts and would like to see more like them -
but
> > believe that more time has been expended on pointless lawmaking
> > and the voting, web work, and debate that are brought about as
> > its result.
> >
> > Vale, Octavius.
> >
> > --
> > hucke@
> > http://www.graveyards.com
> >
> > "What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
> > clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
> > over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46151 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
SALVE CATO !

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
> You bring up an interesting point. Magistrates are elected
precisely because the citizens feel that they hold the necessary
qualifications, both tangible and intangible, to fulfill their
expectations - there is the assumption that the People are confident
that the individuals elected to fill magistracies can do so, and the
People grant them (the magistrates) various powers and authority to
do so. Now imagine that these elected magistrates proceed to issue
edicta in compliance with the lex Constitutiva, to "advance the
mission and function" of Nova Roma. >>>

I totally agree with you. I have doubts only about the way.

> This already happens, and the Senate has nothing to do with it.
You and I, as curule aediles, have issued a series of edicta
concerning the running of the Macellum, the celebrations of the
ludi, &c.,>>>

Agree, but all these edicts were over our potestas area. They were
applied in our area of interest and responsability.

> exactly as we should have in order to fulfill our obligations and
> duties under the law. It was entirely unnecessary to consult the
> Senate before issuing these edicts simply because the People, not
the Senate, is the source of the authority by which we are enabled to
issue such edicts.>>>

I don't talk about the Senate consultation. I talk about, and I
repeat, the way. Sure you have the right to issue an edict and in
the same time anothers to intercessio.
I want to say that is better to put that as a proposal and to not
jump first with an edict. I understand very well that someone have
the right to issue edicts, but I understand very well that another
way exist.
The Aedilician Fund was approved by the Senate. An edict can change
that ?


> You are entirely correct in one way - it would certainly be
possible for me to create the Gaius Equitius Cato Fund For Helping
Citizens Do Things, and it could function privately. But the goal
of the proposed Fund is much more important than any single
individual; I think it entirely within the scope of praetorial
authority to issue such an edict which, like many others, could be
continued by those who followed in the praetorship, year after
year.>>>

How I said, I see different only the way. In rest I agree.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46152 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
Cato Iulio Sabino sal.

Salve Sabine!

Ah, yes, I understand. I was simply responding to Apollonius Cordus'
concern that a praetor could not make this happen. You are right that
optimally, the Senate would be consulted, &c., but if that does not
happen - and since the proposal for the Aedilician Fund has been
sitting around for several months without any action having been
taken yet, this is in fact what is happening - then a praetor could
simply issue an edict regarding it, and I think defensibly so under
the wording of the lex Constitutiva.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46153 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Question for Fl. Vedius & other candidates
SALVE CATO !

Now, I understand you, too. I agree.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
>
> Cato Iulio Sabino sal.
>
> Salve Sabine!
>
> Ah, yes, I understand. I was simply responding to Apollonius
Cordus'
> concern that a praetor could not make this happen. You are right
that
> optimally, the Senate would be consulted, &c., but if that does not
> happen - and since the proposal for the Aedilician Fund has been
> sitting around for several months without any action having been
> taken yet, this is in fact what is happening - then a praetor could
> simply issue an edict regarding it, and I think defensibly so under
> the wording of the lex Constitutiva.
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46154 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: FW: [Latinitas] DE LINGUA LATINA IN NR: Learn to speak LATIN, join
A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis
S.P.D.

Forwarded from the Latin Sodalitas, of which I am the elected co-chair
(along with Cordus).

Curate ut valeatis optime!


------ Forwarded Message
From: "A. Gratius Avitus" <>
>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:53:54 -0000

Subject: [Latinitas] DE LINGUA LATINA IN NR: Learn to speak LATIN, join my
Latin courses!





DE LINGUA LATINA IN NR: Learn to speak LATIN, the language of our
forefathers!

A. Gratius Avitus
concivibus optimis suís
S·P·D

We all know that the aim of Nova Roma (cf.
<http://www.novaroma.org/main.html> at the bottom of the page) is to bring
about a
general revival of all aspects of Roman civilisation, from politics to
religion, from
philosophy to cookery or literature or the arts, a core aspect of that Roman
culture being
the Virtues that gave a small city on the banks of the Tiber the moral and
practical
strength to govern much of the world, virtues that are most sorely lacking
in our society
today.

It can escape no-one, though, that there is only one language in which those
virtues and
that culture and civilisation ever found their most authentic and universal
expression. The
language Rome spoke was LATIN. The Latin language is the most apt and only
authentic
vehicle to fully express the Roman culture, to gain access to her
literature, her ideas and
philosophies, to immerse oneself in her ethics and virtues, and to not only
understand but
also intimately adopt and perfectly embody her complete world-view and way
of life; it is
also the only language in which the Roman religious rites can be duly
performed.

Nova Roma shows the essential importance of this language in all its
terminology: the
different positions of government, the official names of the laws and
decrees, the names
of the virtues are all expressed in Latin.

It is essential to promote the Lingua Latina and its revival in all
circumstances of life
among our fellow citizens (cf.
<http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lingua_Latina>).

Most people think that Latin is a dead language, as dead as the Roman
virtues or the
culture it conveyed; but we, Nova Romans, know it doesn't have to be like
that, not for the
virtues, not for the culture, not for the language. Latin was the living
language of our
Roman forefathers, and it is a language like all others, that can be learnt
in a leisurely way
and spoken in all situations of everyday life. In fact, there is already a
large community of
Latin speakers out there that prove that this is the case. One can find lots
of information
about that in sites like
<http://www.latinitatis.com/>.

We shouldn't be left behind. We are the rightful depositaries of the Roman
culture and
civilisation, and we should be able and most willing to use the language of
our ancestors
as part of our all-encompassing Roman revival.

I know there are many people among us that have learnt some amount of Latin
before, but
have forgotten so much that are now unable to deal with the language of our
ancestors by
themselves; others will still remember enough to read it, but feel
nontheless unprepared
to use the language in an active manner. There may be people who are even
now learning
Latin somewhere else, or others who may never have studied Latin before.
Anyone, I
repeat, anyone, from those with absolutely no previous knowledge of the
language to
those who have learnt Latin in the past, or even those who are still
learning it elsewhere,
but don't yet feel confident enough with it to use it actively, will be able
to benefit
tremendously from my "Sermo Latinus" courses at the Academia Thules
<http://www.academiathules.org/>. Anyone, therefore, who wants to learn
Latin in order
to be able not only to read its texts with understanding but also to write
it with ease and
fluently to speak it in all situations so that the eternal idiom of our
forefathers is brought
back to active life and everyday usage, is invited and eagerly encouraged to
join those
courses.

I, the Dean of the Faculty of Letters of the Academia Thules, a Latin
philologist fluent in
the language and with a long teaching experience, am offering to take you to
the level of
Latin at which you can start your independent exploration of the sources,
and actually
bring back to active life and everyday usage our eternal Latin language. On
completion,
you will be able to enjoy the less convoluted Latin texts without being
enslaved to the
dictionary, and will also be capable of Latin conversation at an
intermediate level.

My courses are going to start in a week, on 16th October 2759 [2006], and I
strongly
encourage as many Nova Roma citizens as possible to join in. If you want to
do so, you will
have to order the material today!

You will be able to find much more detailed information about the courses,
as well about
all others offered by the Facultas Litterarum, at
<http://www.academiathules.org/studyguide/facultaslitterarum/>, and you are
invited to
enrol as soon as possible at
<http://www.academiathules.org/admissions/>.

Curate ut valeatis omnes!




------ End of Forwarded Message



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46155 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Salve Gai Equiti,

> Octavius, I understand what you are saying; I would, however, ask you
> to consider this: what exactly would you remove from the tabularium?
> What law or laws do you see as unnecessary?

Most of those enacted in the past few years.

The laws that I see as most unnecessary are those that try to
enact legal systems that a community of our type simply doesn't
need; those that micromanage the magistrates; and those that are
very minor tweaks of existing laws that seem to exist for the
sole purpose of taking credit for an earlier consul's work.

Some examples:

Lex Salicia Iudiciaria:
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lex_Salicia_Ivdiciaria_(Nova_Roma)
This enabled any citizen to sue any other for, among other
things, "attacks to dignitas, slander or libel". Praetores are
unable to dismiss even the most ridiculous of such suits on
anything other than technical grounds, and so they proceed onwards
to trials - which accomplish nothing other than wasting everyone's
time and keeping the alleged "slander" in the public mind.

This law has cost us at least one citizen, one whom I consider a
friend: Gaius Minucius Scaevola, victim of a prosecution a few
months ago, simply walked away and refused to participate.
Scaevola was an eager and productive citizen once. It was when
I had dinner with him in Chicago about a year ago that together
we came up with the plan to convert the Nova Roma web site
to a wiki. But once it was going, he never participated; his
community spirit was destroyed by his summons to kangaroo
court.

An online community does not need slander lawsuits, especially
those that cannot be dismissed for gross stupidity. The only
appropriate response to alleged slander is an order from the
list moderators to back down or be moderated.

Additionally, you may have noticed that Scaevola's adversary,
Domitius Constantius Fuscus, has also been absent ever since
he lost the case. While I don't know what else is going on
in his life, it's certainly possible that he is staying away
due to the embarrassment of having lost, and that that event
cost us *two* citizens.

Examples of micromanagement of magistrates:

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lex_Apula_Popillia_de_nominibus_approbationibusque_(Nova_Roma)
Contains lists of names. Why does a list of names need to be in a lex?
Are our Censors too incompetent to publish lists ourselves? Then it goes on
to say that exceptions can be approved, essentially neutering the entire
lengthly section!

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lex_Popillia_senatoria_(Nova_Roma)
This is about four times the length of the laws it replaced, which
had been working just fine. It establishes a complex procedure for
the creation of Senators, and refers to events that won't ever
happen (we won't be "drawing up a list" and "striking from the list"
those who have died; the database obsoletes such functions. So
the first two steps in the procedure are purely imaginary...).
It also has consequences that most of us probably weren't aware of.
For instance, did you know that we can only add Senators after conducting
a census and then announcing the count of Assidui? That means that the
newly elected Consuls and Praetores this year won't be named Senator
until at least a year from now, nor will anyone else - and then, only
if the population level is high enough. (Sorry guys - it's out of
our control!).

And an unnecessary rewrite:

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lex_Apula_de_assiduis_et_capite_censis_(Nova_Roma)
...compare to...
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lex_Vedia_de_Assidui_et_Capiti_Censi_(Nova_Roma)
The "Lex Apula" is basically a cut and paste job, with a bit about priests
added in III.C, and a wholly redundant III.D added. Yet it's called "Lex Apula"
even though 95% of it is the work of Flavius Vedius! That's called
"plagiarism" where I come from.

There are plenty more; these are just the first examples that came
to mind.

> With what would you replace the tabularium?

I don't want to replace it; I'm just saying that much of it can and should
be thrown out.

> 1. There is, for an apparent number of us, an enjoyment in seeing and
> being involved in the creation and development of our own government.

We all have activities that we enjoy here. The problem is, lawmaking
is a hobby that infringes on the ability of others to enjoy their
membership here. No one forces you to eat Roman Cooking, or build
a Lararium, or practise Latin oratory, or write for the web site,
or make your own armour and march in formation; yet we have to live
with the results of what those who enjoy lawmaking see fit to foist
upon us. And some have had more than their fill of this nonsense,
and have left us: Marius Fimbria. Aelius Ericius. Dexippus.
Cassius Calvus. Minucius Scaevola. I'd burn down the entire
Tabularium to get any of them back.

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46156 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Cato Marco Octavio sal.

Salve Marcus Octavius.

Hard to believe perhaps but on the whole I agree with you.

I only ask you to consider:

1) at least one of the leges to which you refer, the lex Popillia,
was written in response to a hue and cry about some kind of alleged
"favoritism" on the part of the censors regarding senatorial seat
announcements. Because some a certain group of people felt this way,
a new lex was demanded to try to "enforce" some kind of impartiality
in that process. Those who wrote the law to respond to this demand
tried to do so in a way that reflected ancient Roman practice; in
ancient Rome it would not have been necessary because it was part of
the mos maiorum that certain etiqutte was followed regarding the
Senate, but because we do not have that...it becomes a lengthy
process. We responded in a very Roman way: a perceived problem arose,
we wrote a lex to deal with it.

2) you wrote:

"An online community does not need slander lawsuits, especially
those that cannot be dismissed for gross stupidity. The only
appropriate response to alleged slander is an order from the
list moderators to back down or be moderated."

As someone who really has no problem with being insulted or vilified
or simply declared a nuisance, I sympathize with your dislike for what
you consider frivolous and disruptive - I could care less what someone
who dislikes my political or social stances, and if I think my
opponent in a discussion crosses the line into ad hominem attacks,
I'll say so clearly and unequivocably. However, not all of our
citizens are as thick-skinned as you or I, nor do we have the right to
demand that they be so. Citizens have the right to answer what they
feel are atracks on their dignitas, and we need to respect that,
online community or not. What you consider frivolous may be deeply
painful to another citizen.

Minucius Scaevola was my friend, too, and I have lost not only a
fellow-citizen but a friendship - and all because I simply think that
if a citizen believes themselves to have been subjected to harm they
have the right to be heard and have the matter adjuducated as
impartially as possible - even if I personally don't think the action
was particularly grievous. I have served as an advocatus for several
citizens (although this was the only instance in which a trial
actually occurred) not because I necessarily thought they were
"right", but because they deserve to be treated equally under, and be
protected by, the law.

3) you wrote:

"Why does a list of names need to be in a lex? Are our Censors too
incompetent to publish lists ourselves? Then it goes on to say that
exceptions can be approved, essentially neutering the entire
lengthly section!"

Again, it is an honest attempt to adapt ourselves as closely as
possible to the ancients; something utterly unnecessary then, but
necessary now.


4) Almost every single convolution in our tabularium exists because
the lex Constitutiva simply fails as a legal authority - yet what we
do in our tabularium, and specifically with the lex Constitutiva, is
important because we have bound ourselves legally, macronationally, to
it by making it our corporate By-Laws. This must change. Once we
have set up simpler By-Laws that are not dependent upon the lex
Constitutiva, we can scrap the whole tabularium if you want and start
clean and fresh. I am in the process of drafting a set of By-Laws
that are entirely seperate the macronational organization from the
lex Constitutiva; I have written such By-Laws for three macronational
not-for-profit organizations in the US already, so I know what I'm
doing. If elected praetor (and even if not) I will do everything in
my power to see that we are freed from this burden.

We could go back and forth forever, but I have made it clear exactly
how I feel about the lex Constitutiva's unhistoric stranglehold on our
entire tabularium.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46157 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: ATTENTION GOVERNORS AND PROVINCIAL WEBMASTERS
Please see the following page:

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provinciae_%28Nova_Roma%29

We need logos for each province. If yours isn't there, please upload
it or mail it, as a 300x200 pixel GIF with name "Provincia_XXXXX_XXXX.gif".
The new version of the Album Civium will be online in a few days, and all
your citizens' pages will have a broken image icon if your province's
logo is missing! So please, get them resized and uploaded.

Valete, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46158 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Salvete omnes,

The proposed process for altering the Constitution is itself
unconstitutional. The people should pass the amendment in the
comitia centuriata. The Senate then ratify the document. The
proposed process is back to front and unconstitutional. The process
as laid down in Section I.D of the Constitution states:

"This Constitution may be altered by law passed by the comitia
centuriata; such alterations to this Constitution must be ratified
by a vote of two-thirds of the entire Senate before they shall take
effect. The edicta of an appointed Dictator may also alter this
Constitution, subject to ratification by the Senate."

Under the terms of the Constitution the people vote and then the
Senate ratify, in that order. It is extremely important that this
process is preserved, for it would be an extremely dangerous
precedent to have the supreme source of legal authority in Nova Roma
altered first by the Senate. That places the people second to the
Senate and subject to exhortations tot vote for changes on the basis
of the "great and the good" having passed the changes.

The fact that I personally regard the Constitution as an unhistoric
and flawed millstone around our necks is irrelevant. As long as it
exists and as long as it is the supreme source of legal authority,
it should be abided by to the letter.

I would invite the Tribunes, one and all, to comment on why the
process to change the Constitution is being ignored.

Valete
Cn. Iulius Caesar


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
(Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> The Senate is called to order jointly for October 9, 2006 (2759) by
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, Consul, and Pompeia Minucia Stabo,
> Consul.There are five constitutional amendments under
> consideration. There will be 96 hours of discussion, followed by
96
> hours of voting. Discussion shall end on Thursday October 12th,
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46159 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
---


Salvete Caesar et Omnes:

I do think you are being presumptuous. We are calling the Senate for
consideration of Constitutional amendments...some of them
necessitate some discussion in chambers before they go to comitia.
This does not mean that the Consuls intend to ignore necessary
constitutional procedures. I'm sure the Tribunes will keep us on
our toes, but as it stands, this Senate call as written is quite
above board.

To expand, if the Senators don't like what's on the table, why
bother comitia over items they will hardly ratify, as they never
agreed with them in the first place?

I hope this settles your apprehensions.



Valete
Pompeia Minucia Strabo
Consul




In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
<gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> The proposed process for altering the Constitution is itself
> unconstitutional. The people should pass the amendment in the
> comitia centuriata. The Senate then ratify the document. The
> proposed process is back to front and unconstitutional. The
process
> as laid down in Section I.D of the Constitution states:
>
> "This Constitution may be altered by law passed by the comitia
> centuriata; such alterations to this Constitution must be ratified
> by a vote of two-thirds of the entire Senate before they shall
take
> effect. The edicta of an appointed Dictator may also alter this
> Constitution, subject to ratification by the Senate."
>
> Under the terms of the Constitution the people vote and then the
> Senate ratify, in that order. It is extremely important that this
> process is preserved, for it would be an extremely dangerous
> precedent to have the supreme source of legal authority in Nova
Roma
> altered first by the Senate. That places the people second to the
> Senate and subject to exhortations tot vote for changes on the
basis
> of the "great and the good" having passed the changes.
>
> The fact that I personally regard the Constitution as an
unhistoric
> and flawed millstone around our necks is irrelevant. As long as it
> exists and as long as it is the supreme source of legal authority,
> it should be abided by to the letter.
>
> I would invite the Tribunes, one and all, to comment on why the
> process to change the Constitution is being ignored.
>
> Valete
> Cn. Iulius Caesar
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
> (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > The Senate is called to order jointly for October 9, 2006 (2759)
by
> > Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, Consul, and Pompeia Minucia Stabo,
> > Consul.There are five constitutional amendments under
> > consideration. There will be 96 hours of discussion, followed
by
> 96
> > hours of voting. Discussion shall end on Thursday October 12th,
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46160 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Salve Gnae Iuli Caesar,

The tribunes must post the Senate Session to the plebian lists for
all to see once the senate is called into session. I immediately
posted the announcement yesterday when it came up.
I think a few of the tribunes may be away for the weekend but this
process to change the Constitution will be certainly addressed and
not ignored in our ranks.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus






--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
<gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> The proposed process for altering the Constitution is itself
> unconstitutional. The people should pass the amendment in the
> comitia centuriata. The Senate then ratify the document. The
> proposed process is back to front and unconstitutional. The
process
> as laid down in Section I.D of the Constitution states:
>
> "This Constitution may be altered by law passed by the comitia
> centuriata; such alterations to this Constitution must be ratified
> by a vote of two-thirds of the entire Senate before they shall
take
> effect. The edicta of an appointed Dictator may also alter this
> Constitution, subject to ratification by the Senate."
>
> Under the terms of the Constitution the people vote and then the
> Senate ratify, in that order. It is extremely important that this
> process is preserved, for it would be an extremely dangerous
> precedent to have the supreme source of legal authority in Nova
Roma
> altered first by the Senate. That places the people second to the
> Senate and subject to exhortations tot vote for changes on the
basis
> of the "great and the good" having passed the changes.
>
> The fact that I personally regard the Constitution as an
unhistoric
> and flawed millstone around our necks is irrelevant. As long as it
> exists and as long as it is the supreme source of legal authority,
> it should be abided by to the letter.
>
> I would invite the Tribunes, one and all, to comment on why the
> process to change the Constitution is being ignored.
>
> Valete
> Cn. Iulius Caesar
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
> (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > The Senate is called to order jointly for October 9, 2006 (2759)
by
> > Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, Consul, and Pompeia Minucia Stabo,
> > Consul.There are five constitutional amendments under
> > consideration. There will be 96 hours of discussion, followed
by
> 96
> > hours of voting. Discussion shall end on Thursday October 12th,
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46161 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Salve Consul.

The process is the process is the process. Comitia vote sfirst then
Senate ratifies. That is the order of things as per our supreme legal
document. As described the Senate will vote first then the people will
ratify. This is unconstitutional.

Vale
Cn. Iulius Caesar


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> ---
>
>
> Salvete Caesar et Omnes:
>
> I do think you are being presumptuous. We are calling the Senate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46162 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Salvete

I find myself in agreement with Gnaeus Iulius Caesar. The Senate may discuss whatever it wishes, but, by the constitution, should not vote to ratify any amendments. The comitia must vote first to accept the amendments, then the Senate decides whether or not to ratify the amendments.

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
Tribune of the Plebs



pompeia_minucia_tiberia <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
---

Salvete Caesar et Omnes:

I do think you are being presumptuous. We are calling the Senate for
consideration of Constitutional amendments...some of them
necessitate some discussion in chambers before they go to comitia.
This does not mean that the Consuls intend to ignore necessary
constitutional procedures. I'm sure the Tribunes will keep us on
our toes, but as it stands, this Senate call as written is quite
above board.

To expand, if the Senators don't like what's on the table, why
bother comitia over items they will hardly ratify, as they never
agreed with them in the first place?

I hope this settles your apprehensions.

Valete
Pompeia Minucia Strabo
Consul

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
<gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> The proposed process for altering the Constitution is itself
> unconstitutional. The people should pass the amendment in the
> comitia centuriata. The Senate then ratify the document. The
> proposed process is back to front and unconstitutional. The
process
> as laid down in Section I.D of the Constitution states:
>
> "This Constitution may be altered by law passed by the comitia
> centuriata; such alterations to this Constitution must be ratified
> by a vote of two-thirds of the entire Senate before they shall
take
> effect. The edicta of an appointed Dictator may also alter this
> Constitution, subject to ratification by the Senate."
>
> Under the terms of the Constitution the people vote and then the
> Senate ratify, in that order. It is extremely important that this
> process is preserved, for it would be an extremely dangerous
> precedent to have the supreme source of legal authority in Nova
Roma
> altered first by the Senate. That places the people second to the
> Senate and subject to exhortations tot vote for changes on the
basis
> of the "great and the good" having passed the changes.
>
> The fact that I personally regard the Constitution as an
unhistoric
> and flawed millstone around our necks is irrelevant. As long as it
> exists and as long as it is the supreme source of legal authority,
> it should be abided by to the letter.
>
> I would invite the Tribunes, one and all, to comment on why the
> process to change the Constitution is being ignored.
>
> Valete
> Cn. Iulius Caesar
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
> (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > The Senate is called to order jointly for October 9, 2006 (2759)
by
> > Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, Consul, and Pompeia Minucia Stabo,
> > Consul.There are five constitutional amendments under
> > consideration. There will be 96 hours of discussion, followed
by
> 96
> > hours of voting. Discussion shall end on Thursday October 12th,
>






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46163 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Salvete Omnes,

While the disagreements on the necessity of getting rid of the
Constitution between myself and Gnaeus Iulius Caesar are well-known, I
must agree with him on this specific issue. (And my apologies for not
pointing it out myself when I first saw the notice.)

It is impossible for the Senate to ratify something which has not yet
been voted on by the comitia.

I am certain, however, that no ill-intent was borne by our good Consuls,
and this was a simple oversight, and will be corrected forthwith. It is
a simple procedural matter that should not be blown out of proportion by
anyone on any side.

As a kindness, I would point out to our good Gnaeus Iulius Caesar that a
less confrontational approach, at least at the outset, might go over
somewhat better. His point could have been gotten across just as well
had he posted a question to the effect of "Isn't the Comitia Centuriata
supposed to vote first?" rather than immediately launching into a call
for the Tribunes to comment (with the implication that they should issue
an intercessio).

Let's have a little faith in the goodwill and good intentions of our
seated magistrates.

Valete,

Flavius Vedius Germanicus
Pater Patriae
Consular
Senator

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Flavius_Vedius_Germanicus_(Election_MMDCCLIX)


Gnaeus Iulius Caesar wrote:

>Salvete omnes,
>
>The proposed process for altering the Constitution is itself
>unconstitutional. The people should pass the amendment in the
>comitia centuriata. The Senate then ratify the document. The
>proposed process is back to front and unconstitutional. The process
>as laid down in Section I.D of the Constitution states:
>
>"This Constitution may be altered by law passed by the comitia
>centuriata; such alterations to this Constitution must be ratified
>by a vote of two-thirds of the entire Senate before they shall take
>effect. The edicta of an appointed Dictator may also alter this
>Constitution, subject to ratification by the Senate."
>
>Under the terms of the Constitution the people vote and then the
>Senate ratify, in that order. It is extremely important that this
>process is preserved, for it would be an extremely dangerous
>precedent to have the supreme source of legal authority in Nova Roma
>altered first by the Senate. That places the people second to the
>Senate and subject to exhortations tot vote for changes on the basis
>of the "great and the good" having passed the changes.
>
>The fact that I personally regard the Constitution as an unhistoric
>and flawed millstone around our necks is irrelevant. As long as it
>exists and as long as it is the supreme source of legal authority,
>it should be abided by to the letter.
>
>I would invite the Tribunes, one and all, to comment on why the
>process to change the Constitution is being ignored.
>
>Valete
>Cn. Iulius Caesar
>
>
>--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>(Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:
>
>
>>Salvete omnes,
>>
>>The Senate is called to order jointly for October 9, 2006 (2759) by
>>Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, Consul, and Pompeia Minucia Stabo,
>>Consul.There are five constitutional amendments under
>>consideration. There will be 96 hours of discussion, followed by
>>
>>
>96
>
>
>>hours of voting. Discussion shall end on Thursday October 12th,
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46164 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
> Salve Consul.
>
> The process is the process is the process. Comitia vote sfirst then
> Senate ratifies. That is the order of things as per our supreme legal
> document. As described the Senate will vote first then the people will
> ratify. This is unconstitutional.

Not if the initial Senate vote is advisory and non-binding. The Senate
votes on what to advance to the Comitia, the Comitia votes, those that
survive can then be rubber-stamped by the same Senators that voted for
them earlier.

Vale, O.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46165 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Cn. Iulius Caesar:

It is not unconstitutional for a Consul to convene the Senate to discuss
something of importance. Both my colleague and myself are aware of the
Constitution. We understand that something presented to the senate for
consultation and consensus will need to be presented again for
ratification. However, as a Consul with a very important Religio reform
package I want the senates input and hopeful approval before I present
material to the Comitia.

The Religio reform proposal was sent to the senate back in April. However,
there are senators who have commented to me privately as if they have only
seen it for the first time. By convening the senate I am ensuring that each
senator will look over the documents presented and offer an opinion. I
value these opinions, and they will help in presenting the material to the
Comitia.

Vale;

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Consul

On 10/9/06, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Consul.
>
> The process is the process is the process. Comitia vote sfirst then
> Senate ratifies. That is the order of things as per our supreme legal
> document. As described the Senate will vote first then the people will
> ratify. This is unconstitutional.
>
> Vale
> Cn. Iulius Caesar
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46166 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
---Salve Tribune Agrippa:

Please look up the meaning of 'ratify',then look up the meaning
of 'consider'. If I want to ask the Senate for advice
(consideration) as to whether certain ideas are worth presenting to
comitia or are totally absurd I may by my imperium do so.

I can call the Senate into session to ask whether I should wear blue
or red on a given day if I thought this mattered to the wellbeing of
the people of Nova Roma....'before' I trouble to begin the process
of opening the matter up for a public vote.

The Consuls have not asked for 'ratification' of anything in this
Senate session. You are assuming that we are not intending to follow
due process. We will due what is required. But we are nowhere near
that point yet are we?

Please wait for us to fail to enact due process before swatting the
air with your gladius.

And you cannot veto a 'nonaction'....especially one based on a loose
assumption. You can, but not with any degree of credibility.

Pompeia Minucia Strabo
Consul

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
<canadaoccidentalis@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete
>
> I find myself in agreement with Gnaeus Iulius Caesar. The
Senate may discuss whatever it wishes, but, by the constitution,
should not vote to ratify any amendments. The comitia must vote
first to accept the amendments, then the Senate decides whether or
not to ratify the amendments.
>
> Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
> Tribune of the Plebs
>
>
>
> pompeia_minucia_tiberia <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
> ---
>
> Salvete Caesar et Omnes:
>
> I do think you are being presumptuous. We are calling the Senate
for
> consideration of Constitutional amendments...some of them
> necessitate some discussion in chambers before they go to comitia.
> This does not mean that the Consuls intend to ignore necessary
> constitutional procedures. I'm sure the Tribunes will keep us on
> our toes, but as it stands, this Senate call as written is quite
> above board.
>
> To expand, if the Senators don't like what's on the table, why
> bother comitia over items they will hardly ratify, as they never
> agreed with them in the first place?
>
> I hope this settles your apprehensions.
>
> Valete
> Pompeia Minucia Strabo
> Consul
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
> <gn_iulius_caesar@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > The proposed process for altering the Constitution is itself
> > unconstitutional. The people should pass the amendment in the
> > comitia centuriata. The Senate then ratify the document. The
> > proposed process is back to front and unconstitutional. The
> process
> > as laid down in Section I.D of the Constitution states:
> >
> > "This Constitution may be altered by law passed by the comitia
> > centuriata; such alterations to this Constitution must be
ratified
> > by a vote of two-thirds of the entire Senate before they shall
> take
> > effect. The edicta of an appointed Dictator may also alter this
> > Constitution, subject to ratification by the Senate."
> >
> > Under the terms of the Constitution the people vote and then the
> > Senate ratify, in that order. It is extremely important that
this
> > process is preserved, for it would be an extremely dangerous
> > precedent to have the supreme source of legal authority in Nova
> Roma
> > altered first by the Senate. That places the people second to
the
> > Senate and subject to exhortations tot vote for changes on the
> basis
> > of the "great and the good" having passed the changes.
> >
> > The fact that I personally regard the Constitution as an
> unhistoric
> > and flawed millstone around our necks is irrelevant. As long as
it
> > exists and as long as it is the supreme source of legal
authority,
> > it should be abided by to the letter.
> >
> > I would invite the Tribunes, one and all, to comment on why the
> > process to change the Constitution is being ignored.
> >
> > Valete
> > Cn. Iulius Caesar
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
> > (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete omnes,
> > >
> > > The Senate is called to order jointly for October 9, 2006
(2759)
> by
> > > Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, Consul, and Pompeia Minucia
Stabo,
> > > Consul.There are five constitutional amendments under
> > > consideration. There will be 96 hours of discussion, followed
> by
> > 96
> > > hours of voting. Discussion shall end on Thursday October 12th,
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46167 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
---Caesar:

You have not read a word I've said, so as far as I'm concerned you
are bored and looking for a feud, and this discussion between you
and me has ended.

Pompeia Minucia Strabo
Consul


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
<gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Consul.
>
> The process is the process is the process. Comitia vote sfirst
then
> Senate ratifies. That is the order of things as per our supreme
legal
> document. As described the Senate will vote first then the people
will
> ratify. This is unconstitutional.
>
> Vale
> Cn. Iulius Caesar
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
> <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@> wrote:
> >
> > ---
> >
> >
> > Salvete Caesar et Omnes:
> >
> > I do think you are being presumptuous. We are calling the Senate
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46168 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Salvete,

Absolutely correct. It certainly makes sense to query "the mind of the
Senate". If the current measure is intended to be voted on again in a
formal ratification after the Comitia has had a chance to vote upon it,
I have no problem with such a procedure and in fact commend our good
Consules for doing so.

Vale,

Flavius Vedius Germanicus
Pater Patriae
Consular
Senator

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Flavius_Vedius_Germanicus_(Election_MMDCCLIX)

Matt Hucke wrote:

>
>
>>Salve Consul.
>>
>>The process is the process is the process. Comitia vote sfirst then
>>Senate ratifies. That is the order of things as per our supreme legal
>>document. As described the Senate will vote first then the people will
>>ratify. This is unconstitutional.
>>
>>
>
>Not if the initial Senate vote is advisory and non-binding. The Senate
>votes on what to advance to the Comitia, the Comitia votes, those that
>survive can then be rubber-stamped by the same Senators that voted for
>them earlier.
>
>Vale, O.
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46169 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
---Salve Flavius Vedius:

I must say that I do appreciate your faith in our good intentions.
Even when you were wondering if we had perhaps overlooked something,
you are giving us the benefit of the doubt that we are acting in
good faith, with a gentle correction, as opposed to engaging in a
melee of knee-jerk stickswinging.

How refreshing. Thank you.

Vale
Pompeia Minucia Strabo
Consul


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Flavius Vedius Germanicus
<germanicus@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> While the disagreements on the necessity of getting rid of the
> Constitution between myself and Gnaeus Iulius Caesar are well-
known, I
> must agree with him on this specific issue. (And my apologies for
not
> pointing it out myself when I first saw the notice.)
>
> It is impossible for the Senate to ratify something which has not
yet
> been voted on by the comitia.
>
> I am certain, however, that no ill-intent was borne by our good
Consuls,
> and this was a simple oversight, and will be corrected forthwith.
It is
> a simple procedural matter that should not be blown out of
proportion by
> anyone on any side.
>
> As a kindness, I would point out to our good Gnaeus Iulius Caesar
that a
> less confrontational approach, at least at the outset, might go
over
> somewhat better. His point could have been gotten across just as
well
> had he posted a question to the effect of "Isn't the Comitia
Centuriata
> supposed to vote first?" rather than immediately launching into a
call
> for the Tribunes to comment (with the implication that they should
issue
> an intercessio).
>
> Let's have a little faith in the goodwill and good intentions of
our
> seated magistrates.
>
> Valete,
>
> Flavius Vedius Germanicus
> Pater Patriae
> Consular
> Senator
>
> http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Flavius_Vedius_Germanicus_
(Election_MMDCCLIX)
>
>
> Gnaeus Iulius Caesar wrote:
>
> >Salvete omnes,
> >
> >The proposed process for altering the Constitution is itself
> >unconstitutional. The people should pass the amendment in the
> >comitia centuriata. The Senate then ratify the document. The
> >proposed process is back to front and unconstitutional. The
process
> >as laid down in Section I.D of the Constitution states:
> >
> >"This Constitution may be altered by law passed by the comitia
> >centuriata; such alterations to this Constitution must be
ratified
> >by a vote of two-thirds of the entire Senate before they shall
take
> >effect. The edicta of an appointed Dictator may also alter this
> >Constitution, subject to ratification by the Senate."
> >
> >Under the terms of the Constitution the people vote and then the
> >Senate ratify, in that order. It is extremely important that this
> >process is preserved, for it would be an extremely dangerous
> >precedent to have the supreme source of legal authority in Nova
Roma
> >altered first by the Senate. That places the people second to the
> >Senate and subject to exhortations tot vote for changes on the
basis
> >of the "great and the good" having passed the changes.
> >
> >The fact that I personally regard the Constitution as an
unhistoric
> >and flawed millstone around our necks is irrelevant. As long as
it
> >exists and as long as it is the supreme source of legal
authority,
> >it should be abided by to the letter.
> >
> >I would invite the Tribunes, one and all, to comment on why the
> >process to change the Constitution is being ignored.
> >
> >Valete
> >Cn. Iulius Caesar
> >
> >
> >--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
> >(Michael Kelly)" <mjk@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Salvete omnes,
> >>
> >>The Senate is called to order jointly for October 9, 2006 (2759)
by
> >>Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, Consul, and Pompeia Minucia Stabo,
> >>Consul.There are five constitutional amendments under
> >>consideration. There will be 96 hours of discussion, followed
by
> >>
> >>
> >96
> >
> >
> >>hours of voting. Discussion shall end on Thursday October 12th,
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46170 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Indeed! It is nice to see someone take a moderate and peaceful position
instead of accusations of illegal activity.

Valete:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 10/9/06, pompeia_minucia_tiberia <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
wrote:
>
> ---Salve Flavius Vedius:
>
> I must say that I do appreciate your faith in our good intentions.
> Even when you were wondering if we had perhaps overlooked something,
> you are giving us the benefit of the doubt that we are acting in
> good faith, with a gentle correction, as opposed to engaging in a
> melee of knee-jerk stickswinging.
>
> How refreshing. Thank you.
>
> Vale
> Pompeia Minucia Strabo
> Consul
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46171 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
F. Galerius Aurelianus Pompeia Minucia Tiberia Consul. Salve.

I believe that the citizen has a valid point in that the Comitia should
discuss the proposed amendments before the Senate, if the Constitution is being
brought up. After all, you did swear to defend and protect the Constitution
when you took office. If you can show that the Senate has the right under the
Constitution to discuss the amendments, then you should cite the relevant
sections instead of saying that a citizen's comments are presumptuous. Your
post reads, in my opinion, as autocratic and belittling. Of course, I am a
plebeian and I always consider if the action of a patrician magistrate may
require the intervention of the tribunes.

Salvete Caesar et Omnes:

I do think you are being presumptuous. We are calling the Senate for
consideration of Constitutional amendments...some of them
necessitate some discussion in chambers before they go to comitia.
This does not mean that the Consuls intend to ignore necessary
constitutional procedures. I'm sure the Tribunes will keep us on
our toes, but as it stands, this Senate call as written is quite
above board.

To expand, if the Senators don't like what's on the table, why
bother comitia over items they will hardly ratify, as they never
agreed with them in the first place?

I hope this settles your apprehensions.

Salvete omnes,

The proposed process for altering the Constitution is itself
unconstitutional. The people should pass the amendment in the
comitia centuriata. The Senate then ratify the document. The
proposed process is back to front and unconstitutional. The process
as laid down in Section I.D of the Constitution states:

"This Constitution may be altered by law passed by the comitia
centuriata; such alterations to this Constitution must be ratified
by a vote of two-thirds of the entire Senate before they shall take
effect. The edicta of an appointed Dictator may also alter this
Constitution, subject to ratification by the Senate."

Under the terms of the Constitution the people vote and then the
Senate ratify, in that order. It is extremely important that this
process is preserved, for it would be an extremely dangerous
precedent to have the supreme source of legal authority in Nova Roma
altered first by the Senate. That places the people second to the
Senate and subject to exhortations tot vote for changes on the basis
of the "great and the good" having passed the changes.

The fact that I personally regard the Constitution as an unhistoric
and flawed millstone around our necks is irrelevant. As long as it
exists and as long as it is the supreme source of legal authority,
it should be abided by to the letter.

I would invite the Tribunes, one and all, to comment on why the
process to change the Constitution is being ignored.

Valete
Cn. Iulius Caesar



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46172 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
I stand corrected. Pompeia Minucia Strabo Consul's remarks were VERY
autocratic and belittling to the citizen who posted and this most recent post
demonstrates that she responds before considering what she chooses to post. If
she chooses to respond in a petulant manner, it decreases whatever respect the
Comitia and citizens hold for her, her office, and the Senate.

"I can call the Senate into session to ask whether I should wear blue or red
on a given day if I thought this mattered to the wellbeing of the people of
Nova Roma....'before' I trouble to begin the process of opening the matter up
for a public vote."

F. Galerius Aurelianus



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46173 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Salve Consul,

The matter is simple. The process is defined. Either the correct
process was known and ignored, or the correct process was not known
(in which case it should have been as this is the process followed
to date and plainly in the Constitution) or the Consul was quite
happy to see the matter put before the Senate twice, and for the
Senate to have to debate and vote on it twice.

If the Senate want to debate and vote on the same matter twice, it
is for that body to decide if this process is an expeditious use of
their time. Either way it will have to go back to them to ratify
after vote in Comitia to be regarded as legal and constitutional.
There was no mention of it going back to the Senate in the initial
call for the Senate to convene.

Either something is illegal or it isn't. Clearly this process is
illegal - end of story. As to ill-will, I leave it to individuals to
decide whether it was a lack of care about the process, an ignorance
of the process or a duplication of a process.

I am not dressing this issue up to be accompanied by a bunch of
virtual flowers and a pretty please and thank you note. Such
approaches tend to get "overlooked" on this list. Matters of this
sort have to be stated firmly and plainly. I at least have
introduced no emotion into this issue, just facts.

Process is process is process. Simply follow how things have always
been done and then there would have been no need to point this out.

Vale
Cn. Iulius Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "David Kling (Modianus)"
<tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Indeed! It is nice to see someone take a moderate and peaceful
position
> instead of accusations of illegal activity.
>
> Valete:
>
> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46174 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Salve Consul,

It is sometimes said that there are two sorts of people.

Those who look at government and see it run by flawed people with good
intentions, and those who see it run by superhumanly-effective people
with evil intentions.

*grin*

In all seriousness, I thank you. I think if more of us gave the benefit
of the doubt to one another, Nova Roma would certainly be a better place.

Vale,

Flavius Vedius Germanicus
Pater Patriae
Consular
Senator

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Flavius_Vedius_Germanicus_(Election_MMDCCLIX)





pompeia_minucia_tiberia wrote:

>---Salve Flavius Vedius:
>
>I must say that I do appreciate your faith in our good intentions.
>Even when you were wondering if we had perhaps overlooked something,
>you are giving us the benefit of the doubt that we are acting in
>good faith, with a gentle correction, as opposed to engaging in a
>melee of knee-jerk stickswinging.
>
>How refreshing. Thank you.
>
>Vale
>Pompeia Minucia Strabo
>Consul
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Flavius Vedius Germanicus
><germanicus@...> wrote:
>
>
>>Salvete Omnes,
>>
>>While the disagreements on the necessity of getting rid of the
>>Constitution between myself and Gnaeus Iulius Caesar are well-
>>
>>
>known, I
>
>
>>must agree with him on this specific issue. (And my apologies for
>>
>>
>not
>
>
>>pointing it out myself when I first saw the notice.)
>>
>>It is impossible for the Senate to ratify something which has not
>>
>>
>yet
>
>
>>been voted on by the comitia.
>>
>>I am certain, however, that no ill-intent was borne by our good
>>
>>
>Consuls,
>
>
>>and this was a simple oversight, and will be corrected forthwith.
>>
>>
>It is
>
>
>>a simple procedural matter that should not be blown out of
>>
>>
>proportion by
>
>
>>anyone on any side.
>>
>>As a kindness, I would point out to our good Gnaeus Iulius Caesar
>>
>>
>that a
>
>
>>less confrontational approach, at least at the outset, might go
>>
>>
>over
>
>
>>somewhat better. His point could have been gotten across just as
>>
>>
>well
>
>
>>had he posted a question to the effect of "Isn't the Comitia
>>
>>
>Centuriata
>
>
>>supposed to vote first?" rather than immediately launching into a
>>
>>
>call
>
>
>>for the Tribunes to comment (with the implication that they should
>>
>>
>issue
>
>
>>an intercessio).
>>
>>Let's have a little faith in the goodwill and good intentions of
>>
>>
>our
>
>
>>seated magistrates.
>>
>>Valete,
>>
>>Flavius Vedius Germanicus
>>Pater Patriae
>>Consular
>>Senator
>>
>>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Flavius_Vedius_Germanicus_
>>
>>
>(Election_MMDCCLIX)
>
>
>>Gnaeus Iulius Caesar wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Salvete omnes,
>>>
>>>The proposed process for altering the Constitution is itself
>>>unconstitutional. The people should pass the amendment in the
>>>comitia centuriata. The Senate then ratify the document. The
>>>proposed process is back to front and unconstitutional. The
>>>
>>>
>process
>
>
>>>as laid down in Section I.D of the Constitution states:
>>>
>>>"This Constitution may be altered by law passed by the comitia
>>>centuriata; such alterations to this Constitution must be
>>>
>>>
>ratified
>
>
>>>by a vote of two-thirds of the entire Senate before they shall
>>>
>>>
>take
>
>
>>>effect. The edicta of an appointed Dictator may also alter this
>>>Constitution, subject to ratification by the Senate."
>>>
>>>Under the terms of the Constitution the people vote and then the
>>>Senate ratify, in that order. It is extremely important that this
>>>process is preserved, for it would be an extremely dangerous
>>>precedent to have the supreme source of legal authority in Nova
>>>
>>>
>Roma
>
>
>>>altered first by the Senate. That places the people second to the
>>>Senate and subject to exhortations tot vote for changes on the
>>>
>>>
>basis
>
>
>>>of the "great and the good" having passed the changes.
>>>
>>>The fact that I personally regard the Constitution as an
>>>
>>>
>unhistoric
>
>
>>>and flawed millstone around our necks is irrelevant. As long as
>>>
>>>
>it
>
>
>>>exists and as long as it is the supreme source of legal
>>>
>>>
>authority,
>
>
>>>it should be abided by to the letter.
>>>
>>>I would invite the Tribunes, one and all, to comment on why the
>>>process to change the Constitution is being ignored.
>>>
>>>Valete
>>>Cn. Iulius Caesar
>>>
>>>
>>>--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
>>>(Michael Kelly)" <mjk@> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Salvete omnes,
>>>>
>>>>The Senate is called to order jointly for October 9, 2006 (2759)
>>>>
>>>>
>by
>
>
>>>>Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, Consul, and Pompeia Minucia Stabo,
>>>>Consul.There are five constitutional amendments under
>>>>consideration. There will be 96 hours of discussion, followed
>>>>
>>>>
>by
>
>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>96
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>hours of voting. Discussion shall end on Thursday October 12th,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46175 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Salve,

PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:

>Of course, I am a
>plebeian and I always consider if the action of a patrician magistrate may
>require the intervention of the tribunes.
>

If only the Constitution supported your view of the role of the
Tribunes, you would have a point. It doesn't. You don't.

Vale,

Flavius Vedius Germanicus

Pater Patriae
Consular
Senator

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Flavius_Vedius_Germanicus_(Election_MMDCCLIX)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46176 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR OCTOBER 9, 2006
C. Equitius Cato quirites salutem plurimam dicit.

Salvete omnes.

In posting the call to convene the Senate, the tribune who did so used
these words in this order:

"The Senate is asked to consider the following constitutional
amendments...These amendments are to be voted on in segments, so that
the Senators are not obligated to vote for an entire 'package' of
amendments. The amendments adopted by this august body shall be
presented to the Comitia Centuriata for their approval. At this time
appropriate nomenclature shall be assigned to the first four amendments."


So the Senate is, in fact, going to vote to "adopt" amendments to the
Constitution and THEN "present" them to the comitia for their "approval."

In direct contradiction of the lex Constitutiva, the highest legal
authority in the Republic, which says:

"This Constitution may be altered by law passed by the comitia
centuriata; such alterations to this Constitution must be ratified by
a vote of two-thirds of the entire Senate before they shall take
effect." (lex Const. I.D)


Yet one of our consuls not only uses offensive language in addressing
a citizen's concern, but even goes so far as to say:

"Please look up the meaning of 'ratify',then look up the meaning
of 'consider'...The Consuls have not asked for 'ratification' of
anything in this Senate session. You are assuming that we are not
intending to follow due process. We will due [sic] what is required."

Consul Strabo, in English the word "ratify" means "to confirm by
expressing consent, approval, or formal sanction: e.g., to ratify a
constitutional amendment"; again, in English, the word "adopt" means
"to vote to accept"; and in fact, in common English, what the Senate
is being asked to do is PRECISELY what you claim it is not. Not only
is the Senate being asked to vote on these amendments first, contrary
to the law, they are then being asked to present them to the *comitia*
for ratification ("their approval") - exactly the opposite of what the
law requires.

Perhaps you should avail yourself of a dictionary, consul.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46177 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR OCTOBER 9, 2006
--- Salve Equitius Cato:

We did not use the word 'ratify'....we are asking the Senate
for 'consideration' of these...a preapproval of sorts....before we
bother voting in comitia. Ratification occurs after this and is a
rubber stamp of the Senate...we feel the items need to be agreed
upon by the required number of Senators before the process of
comitia even begins. Show me as Consuls where we cannot take this
extra step please. The items in my view merit more than a rubber
stamp...if anything gets past comitia, we'll have it ratified.
If they are 'adopted' in this Senate call, they'll go to comitia, if
not.....never mind...it is a useless pursuit.

I've said this a couple of times to different persons tonight who
either are not reading what I wrote or choose not to.

We have enough Tribunes to veto us if we step out of line, but
please wait for us to do it first.

And when I am presented with block letters in the main forum by a
fellow magistrate advertising my dealings as being unconstitutional,
with a Tribune on his tail augmenting him, without so much as the
courtesy of a note requesting clarification of my intent, I don't
think I am the one being rude by suggesting some presumptuous
thinking is in play, to say the least.

This only reflects on the type of justice I can expect from you as
Praetor.......'guilty until proven innocent'. Thank you for the
chilling demonstration of your promising agenda.

Vale
Pompeia Minucia Strabo
Consul


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato quirites salutem plurimam dicit.
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> In posting the call to convene the Senate, the tribune who did so
used
> these words in this order:
>
> "The Senate is asked to consider the following constitutional
> amendments...These amendments are to be voted on in segments, so
that
> the Senators are not obligated to vote for an entire 'package' of
> amendments. The amendments adopted by this august body shall be
> presented to the Comitia Centuriata for their approval. At this
time
> appropriate nomenclature shall be assigned to the first four
amendments."
>
>
> So the Senate is, in fact, going to vote to "adopt" amendments to
the
> Constitution and THEN "present" them to the comitia for
their "approval."
>
> In direct contradiction of the lex Constitutiva, the highest legal
> authority in the Republic, which says:
>
> "This Constitution may be altered by law passed by the comitia
> centuriata; such alterations to this Constitution must be ratified
by
> a vote of two-thirds of the entire Senate before they shall take
> effect." (lex Const. I.D)
>
>
> Yet one of our consuls not only uses offensive language in
addressing
> a citizen's concern, but even goes so far as to say:
>
> "Please look up the meaning of 'ratify',then look up the meaning
> of 'consider'...The Consuls have not asked for 'ratification' of
> anything in this Senate session. You are assuming that we are not
> intending to follow due process. We will due [sic] what is
required."
>
> Consul Strabo, in English the word "ratify" means "to confirm by
> expressing consent, approval, or formal sanction: e.g., to ratify a
> constitutional amendment"; again, in English, the word "adopt"
means
> "to vote to accept"; and in fact, in common English, what the
Senate
> is being asked to do is PRECISELY what you claim it is not. Not
only
> is the Senate being asked to vote on these amendments first,
contrary
> to the law, they are then being asked to present them to the
*comitia*
> for ratification ("their approval") - exactly the opposite of what
the
> law requires.
>
> Perhaps you should avail yourself of a dictionary, consul.
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46178 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Cato Marco Octavio sal.

Salve Marcus Octavius.

Octavius, you wrote:

"The Senate votes on what to advance to the Comitia..."

Where on earth (or more appropriately, in our law) do you find this?
And you wonder why I show concern over the legal structure of the
Republic?

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46179 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR OCTOBER 9, 2006
Cato P. Minuciae Straboni sal.

Consul, please read the definitions I provided for regarding the words
"adopt" and "ratify". You are correct in one thing: the call to
convene the Senate is actually asking the Senate to "adopt" the
amendments and then have the comitia "ratify" them - again, exactly
contradicting the order called for by the Constitution of the Republic.

Please look up the words "read" and "comprehend", consul; I fear you
are doing much of the former and none of the latter.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46180 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR OCTOBER 9, 2006
Cato Minuciae Straboni sal.

Consul, you wrote:

"And when I am presented with block letters in the main forum by a
fellow magistrate advertising my dealings as being unconstitutional,
with a Tribune on his tail augmenting him, without so much as the
courtesy of a note requesting clarification of my intent, I don't
think I am the one being rude by suggesting some presumptuous
thinking is in play, to say the least."

Yes, you are - first by presuming that the declaration of the process
being unconstitutional was aimed specifically at you; and you are now
showing either a willing disregard for the law that you claim to be in
charge of upholding or you are simply ignorant of that law. Neither
of which is a very commendable state of affairs.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46181 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-10-09
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Marco Octavio sal.
>
> Salve Marcus Octavius.
>
> Octavius, you wrote:
>
> "The Senate votes on what to advance to the Comitia..."
>
> Where on earth (or more appropriately, in our law) do you find this?
> And you wonder why I show concern over the legal structure of the
> Republic?

Answer: When the Consuls wish to convene the Senate for their
direction as to whether or not it's appropriate to advance something
to Comitia the Senate might conceivably not be in favour of in the
first place.

I refer you to your constitution regarding the duties and privileges
of Consuls, Praetor hopeful. Not everything that is 'different' is
illegal.




>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46182 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR OCTOBER 9, 2006
---Equitius Cato:

I fear you are tripping on your own feet, to your own detriment.
Nobody used the word 'ratify' with respect to Comitia...you object
to the phrase 'adopted by the Senate' and I have clarified what is
meant by that....manyfold. You continue to insist on what I 'meant'
in spite of clarification. Evidentally you have some extrasensory
powers the average citizen does not posess....

Again, nowhere in that Senate call is the word 'ratify' attributed
to Comitia.......it is 'approval', which simply means a positive
vote.

For the last time (because this is becoming unproductive)....the
fact that we didn't spell out verbatim that we intended to ratify
these items by the Senate as a final step is not proof postive that
we had no intention of doing it. I'm distressed for you that you
think it is.

Pompeia





In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato P. Minuciae Straboni sal.
>
> Consul, please read the definitions I provided for regarding the
words
> "adopt" and "ratify". You are correct in one thing: the call to
> convene the Senate is actually asking the Senate to "adopt" the
> amendments and then have the comitia "ratify" them - again, exactly
> contradicting the order called for by the Constitution of the
Republic.
>
> Please look up the words "read" and "comprehend", consul; I fear
you
> are doing much of the former and none of the latter.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46183 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR OCTOBER 9, 2006
---Strabo Finale Cato Sal.

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Minuciae Straboni sal.
>
> Consul, you wrote:
>
> "And when I am presented with block letters in the main forum by a
> fellow magistrate advertising my dealings as being
unconstitutional,
> with a Tribune on his tail augmenting him, without so much as the
> courtesy of a note requesting clarification of my intent, I don't
> think I am the one being rude by suggesting some presumptuous
> thinking is in play, to say the least."
>
> Yes, you are - first by presuming that the declaration of the
process
> being unconstitutional was aimed specifically at you;

Pompeia: And myself, being Consul and co-convener of this Senate
Session should not think it's aimed atleast partly at me? And I am
supposed to think it's direct at whom?...The Quaestores, Plebian
Aediles...the populus in general? No, I don't think this can now be
reasonably presented by you as a hypothetical assertion...not after
arguing with the passion you have. Not 'reasonably'...but you are
welcome to argue anything you like and to whatever lengths you see
fit!

I have done my job as Consul in explaining my position to you and
others, just as you have done a good job of doing what you usually
do.

Vale
Pompeia

and you are now
> showing either a willing disregard for the law that you claim to
be in
> charge of upholding or you are simply ignorant of that law.
Neither
> of which is a very commendable state of affairs.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46184 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
gequitiuscato wrote:
> "The Senate votes on what to advance to the Comitia..."
>
> Where on earth (or more appropriately, in our law) do you find this?
> And you wonder why I show concern over the legal structure of the
> Republic?

Salve, Gai Equiti Cato.

Just to explain some background to you and other interested parties, the
probable reason (though I have not spoken in detail with the consuls on
the matter) for the dual-senate business, is that summoning a Comitia
for a vote takes a lot more time and effort than "just" asking the
senate beforehand if they intend to deny it, should it pass.

As you have never participated in a senate session, you are probably not
aware of how they go. However, the reports by the tribunes include some
comments made by various senators that you may have noticed. If a
senator opposes a proposal, he often takes the constructive view and
tells in what ways he would prefer the proposal to be altered.

In the past, this has led to very similar proposal being put before the
Comitia twice, after the first version being rejected by the senate.
That leads to two Comitia and two senate sessions, whereas the method
now employed means one of the Comitia calls will not have to be made.

Two senate sessions will still have to be called, as a second is needed
to ratify the vote of the Comitia. The first one is, as has been pointed
out before you decided to jump in and make this issue part of your
campaign, a consul asking the senate for advice. Which is nothing if not
commendable, as well as spares the populus a repeat of a vote on a
nearly-identical issue. And doesn't remove their right to vote no.

It's a matter of expediency which I wholly endorse. As have been said
many times before, the romans were nothing if not practical by nature.

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46185 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: Patrem Auctoritas
Salvete quirites, et salve colleague,

My censorial colleague wrote:
> Not if the initial Senate vote is advisory and non-binding. The Senate
> votes on what to advance to the Comitia,

This is the historical 'patrem auctoritas', the pre-screening by the Senate of
legislation.

While our written constitution is ahistorical, and our process of requiring
the Senate to approve amendments to the written constitution is also
ahistorical, the request of consuls for the patrem auctoritas is historically
correct.

The Senate exists to serve as the advisory body for the Consuls and Praetors.
It is entirely proper for the Consuls to ask the advice of the Senate on any
matter having to do with our Republic.

Valete,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46186 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: Things to Consider before voting
Salve Octavius,

I agree with everything that you said about the laws. There are too many for
a group our size. Most of the laws in the last years have not come up with
anything original but have been rewrites and rewordings of previous laws.
And the ones that were original are mostly useless.

The ridiculous law about trials and court cases is to me the biggest case of
red tape and time wasting that I've ever seen. Taking another Nova Roman to
a NR court because someone said a nasty word or two to another citizen?
Please. And best yet, if you are rude to me and I don't care, a thrid party
can take you to court.

Another symptom of too many laws is that it makes it difficult for any new
magistrate to learn their job.

Vale,
Diana


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46187 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: a.d. VI Id. Oct.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem VI Idus Octobris; haec dies comitialis est.

"Ad praesens ova cras pullis sunt meliora." (Eggs today are better
than chickens tomorrow) - Anon.


"When the result of this mission was reported in Rome, all other
matters were at once laid aside and the fetials1 were sent to demand
redress. This was refused and the senate decreed that a formal
declaration of war should be submitted for the approval of the people
as soon as possible. The people ratified the action of the senate and
ordered the two consuls to start, each with his army; Valerius for
Campania, where he fixed his camp at Mount Glaurus, whilst Cornelius
advanced into Samnium and encamped at Saticula. Valerius was the
first to come into touch with the Samnite legions. They had marched
into Cam- pania because they thought that this would be the main
theatre of war, and they were burning to wreak their rage on the
Campanians who had been so ready first to help others against them and
then to summon help for themselves. As soon as they saw the Roman
camp, they one and all clamoured for the signal for battle to be given
by their leaders; they declared that the Romans would have the same
luck in helping the Campanians that the Campanians had had in helping
the Sidicines.

For a few days Valerius confined himself to skirmishes, with the
object of testing the enemy's strength. At length he put out the
signal for battle and spoke a few words of encouragement to his men.
He told them not to let themselves be daunted by a new war or a new
enemy, for the further they carried their arms from the City the more
unwarlike were the nations whom they approached. They were not to
measure the courage of the Samnites by the defeats they had inflicted
on the Sidicines and the Campanians; whenever two nations fought
together, whatever the qualities they possessed, one side must
necessarily be vanquished. There was no doubt that as far as the Cam-
panians were concerned they owed their defeats more to their want of
hardihood and the weakening effects of excessive luxury than to the
strength of their enemies. What could two successful wars an the part
of the Samnites through all those centuries weigh against the many
brilliant achievements at the Roman people, who reckoned up almost
more triumphs than years since the foundation of their City, who had
subdued by the might at their arms all the surrounding
nations--Sabines, Etruscans, Latins, Hernici, Aequi, Volscians, and
Auruncans--who had slain the Gauls in so many battles and driven them
at last to their ships? His men must not only go into action in full
reliance upon their own courage and warlike reputation, but they must
also remember under whose auspices and generalship they were going to
fight, whether under a man who is only to be listened to provided he
is a big talker, courageous only in words, ignorant of a soldier's
work, or under one who himself knows how to handle weapons, who can
show himself in the front, and do his duty in the melee at battle. 'I
want you, soldiers,' he continued, 'to follow my deeds not my words,
and to look to me not only for the word at command but also for
example. It was not by party struggles nor by the intrigues so common
amongst the nobles but by my own right hand that I won three
consulships and attained the highest reputation. There was a time when
it might have been said to me, 'Yes, for you were a patrician
descended from the liberators at our country, and your family held the
consulship in the very year when this City first possessed consuls.'
Now, however, the consulship is open to you, plebeians, as much as to
us who are patricians; it is not the reward of high birth as it once
was, but of personal merit. Look forward then, soldiers, to securing
all the highest honours! If with the sanction of the gods you men have
given me this new name at Corvinus, I have not for- gotten the old
cognomen of our family; I have not forgotten that I am a Publicola. I
always study and always have studied the interests of the Roman plebs,
both at home and in the field, whether as a private citizen or holding
public office, whether as military tribune or as consul. I have been
con- sistent to this aim in all my successive consulships. And now for
what is immediately before us: go on with the help at heaven, and win
with me for the first time a triumph over your new foes--the
Samnites.' " - Livy, History of Rome 7.32



"Come, gracious and kindly
Mistresses, into your sacred glade,
where it is not meet for men to see
the solemn rites of the two goddesses,
where, by torchlight, they reveal their immortal visage.

Come, approach, we entreat you,
O holiest Thesmophoroi,
if ever before you heeded and
came. Arrive here, now,
we beseech you, for our sake." - Aristophanes Thesmophoriazousae 1148-59

"Concerning Demeter's initiation rite, which the Greeks call
thesmophoria, let a holy silence be placed on it, except to the extent
it is religiously lawful to speak. Danaus' daughters were the ones who
brought this rite out of Egypt and taught it to Pelasgian women. After
all the peoples of the Peloponnesus had been driven out by the
Dorians, the rite was lost. Only those of the Peloponnesians who were
left behind and the Arcadians, who were not driven out, preserved it."
- Herodotus 2.171

"Bees: the priestesses of Demeter. Demeter herself says in
Apollodorus' first book, 'She brought the basket to the young women
along with Persephone's loom and deeds. Arriving at Paros, she was
entertained at King Melissos' court and bestowed upon his sixty
daughters the gift of Persephone's loom. She also imparted to them
first of all her sufferings concerning Persephone and her mysteries.
From this, henceforth, the women celebrating the Thesmophoria were
called 'bees.' " - Apollodorus of Athens, Fragmenta Historicorum
Graecorum 244.F.89

On this day in ancient Greece the celebration of the Thesmophoria
began. The festival of the Thesmophoria took place in the Athenian
month Pyanepsion (approximately October) and was reserved for women
only. The association of this festival with women was natural to the
Greeks, because they saw agricultural and human fertility as all part
of the same process of reproduction. Women no doubt enjoyed this
holiday because they were able to get out of the house and engage in
religious ritual that (at least in very primitive times) was crucial
to survival. The ritual itself involved retrieving the decayed remains
of sacrificed piglets and dough in the shape of snakes and human
penises, which women had buried undergournd in a late spring festival.
These remains1 were later sprinkled over the fields to promote
fertility. The most widely practiced rites throughout the various
Greek city-states was the festival known as the Thesmophoria. These
rites, considered to be among the most ancient practiced in Greece,
were conducted only by women and honored Demeter, the goddess of
agriculture, and her daughter Persephone/Kore. The Thesmophoria was
traditionally celebrated as a three-day and three-night festival and
consisted of three distinct parts: the Anodos, the opening day
procession up to the Thesmophorion building during which the
participants bring the sacrifices and other cult implements up to the
hill of the Pnyx; the Nesteia, the ritual fasting which comprised the
second day of the ritual; and the sacrifice and feasting that
dominated the third and final day. Throughout the festival, the women
reenact aspects of the myth of Demeter as she searched for her
abducted daughter, ranging from ritualized mouring to celebration as
the reunion of the goddess and her daughter revive the fertility of
the earth. The celebrants camped out for three days and two nights in
an area probably near the Pnyx. On the second day, they fasted and
sat on the ground, perhaps as an act of mourning in imitation of
Demeter, the grain goddess, who refused to eat when Hades stole her
daughter. They also shouted verbal abuse at each other (typical of
agricultural festivals) and struck each other with straps made of
bark. The third day was called Kalligeneia ("bearer of fair
offspring") in honor of Demeter.



"The Muslims planned to go to Tours to destroy the Church of St.
Martin, the city, and the whole country. Then came against them the
glorious Prince Charles, at the head of his whole force. He drew up
his host, and he fought as fiercely as the hungry wolf falls upon the
stag. By the grace of Our Lord, he wrought a great slaughter upon the
enemies of Christian faith, so that---as history bears witness---he
slew in that battle 300,000 men, likewise their king by name
Abderrahman. Then was he [Charles] first called "Martel," for as a
hammer of iron, of steel, and of every other metal, even so he dashed:
and smote in the battle all his enemies. And what was the greatest
marvel of all, he only lost in that battle 1500 men. The tents and
harness [of the enemy] were taken; and whatever else they possessed
became a prey to him and his followers. Eudes, Duke of Aquitaine,
being now reconciled with Prince Charles Martel, later slew as many of
the Saracens as he could find who had escaped from the battle." -
Chronicle of St. Denis

On this day in A.D. 732 the Battle of Tours was fought between forces
under the Frankish leader Charles Martel and an Islamic army led by
Emir Abd er Rahman. During the battle, the Franks defeated the Islamic
army and Emir Abd er Rahman was killed. This battle stopped the
northward advance of Islam from the Iberian peninsula, and is
considered by most historians to be of macrohistorical importance, in
that it may have halted the invasion of Europe by Muslims, and
preserved Christianity as the controlling faith, during a period in
which Islam was overrunning the remains of the old Roman and Persian
Empires. Christian contemporaries, from Bede to Theophanes carefully
recorded the battle and were keen to spell out what they saw as its
implications. Later scholars, such as Edward Gibbon, would contend
that had Martel fallen, the Moors would have easily conquered a
divided Europe. Gibbon wrote that "A victorious line of march had been
prolonged above a thousand miles from the rock of Gibraltar to the
banks of the Loire; the repetition of an equal space would have
carried the Saracens to the confines of Poland and the Highlands of
Scotland; the Rhine is not more impassable than the Nile or Euphrates,
and the Arabian fleet might have sailed without a naval combat into
the mouth of the Thames. Perhaps the interpretation of the Qur'an
would now be taught in the schools of Oxford, and her pulpits might
demonstrate to a circumcised people the sanctity and truth of the
revelation of Muhammed." Some modern assessments of the battle's
impact have backed away from the extreme of Gibbon's position, but
Gibbons's conjecture is supported by other historians such as Edward
Shepard Creasy and William E. Watson.

Contemporary Arab historians and chroniclers are much more interested
in the Arab defeat at Constantinople in 718. Some contemporary
historians argue that had the Arabs actually wished to conquer Europe
they could easily have done so. Essentially these historians argue
that the Arabs were not interested enough to mount a major invasion,
because Northern Europe at that time was considered to be a socially,
culturally and economically backward area with little to interest any
invaders. But this is disputed by the records of the Islamic raids
into India and other non-Muslim states for loot and converts. Given
the great wealth in Christian shrines such as the one at Tours,
Islamic expansion into that area would have been likely had it not
been sharply defeated in 732 by Martel. Further evidence of the
importance of this battle lies in Islamic expansion into all other
regions of the old Roman Empire. It is not likely Gaul would have been
spared save by the strength of Martel's legendary right arm and the
loyalty of his veteran Frankish Army.

Moreover, given the importance they placed on the death of Rahman and
the defeat in Gaul, and the subsequent defeat and destruction of
Muslim bases in what is now France, it is likely that this battle did
have macrohistorical importance in stopping westward Islamic
expansion. Gibbons and his generation of historians are probably more
correct than the contemporary view that this battle lacked major
historical impact. Arab histories written during that period and for
the next several centuries make clear that Rahman's defeat and death
was regarded, and rightly so, as a catastrophe of major proportions.
Their own words record it best: (translated from Arabic) "This deadly
defeat of the Moslems, and the loss of the great leader and good
cavalier, Abderrahman, took place in the hundred and fifteenth year."
This rather plainly puts the lie to those who would lowkey the
macrohistorical importance of the Battle of Tours! Had Martel fallen
at Tours the long term implications for European Christianity would
likely have been devastating.

Valete bene!

Cato

SOURCES

Livy, Herodotus, Apollodorus, Chronicle of St. Denis, Wikipedia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46188 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR OCTOBER 9, 2006
Cato Minuciae Straboni sal.

Consul, you wrote:

"Again, nowhere in that Senate call is the word 'ratify' attributed
to Comitia.......it is 'approval', which simply means a positive
vote."

And, for the last time, I beg you to actually *read* the definition of
the word "ratify": in English the word "ratify" means "to confirm by
expressing consent, approval, or formal sanction: e.g., to ratify a
constitutional amendment".

The sentence "The Senate will vote to adopt amendments to the
Constitution, then ask for the approval of the comitia" is exactly the
same as "The Senate will make alterations to the Constitution then ask
the comitia to ratify those alterations." Both of which, consul,
contradict the law of the Republic.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46189 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus F. Galerio Aureliano salutem dicit

A consul can convene the senate for advice on whatever matter a consul feels
needs to be discussed. The Senate is supposed to be the "repository of
experience and knowledge," and therefore the ones consuls can utilize in
order to make the necessary laws to support the mission of Nova Roma. Too
often in the past Consuls proposed legislation and the senators were the
last to hear about it. Many of our senators don't read the main list -- I
don't understand why, but that is the truth.

Consul Pompeia Minucia Strabo has diligently defended our right to convene
the senate to discuss matters of importance to us as consuls. She is now
having to defend our actions against people who hurdle innuendo and
insults. She is not autocratic and belittling she is right, but those who
want to beat a dead horse are going to do so.

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 10/9/06, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...> wrote:
>
> I stand corrected. Pompeia Minucia Strabo Consul's remarks were VERY
> autocratic and belittling to the citizen who posted and this most recent
> post
> demonstrates that she responds before considering what she chooses to
> post. If
> she chooses to respond in a petulant manner, it decreases whatever respect
> the
> Comitia and citizens hold for her, her office, and the Senate.
>
> "I can call the Senate into session to ask whether I should wear blue or
> red
> on a given day if I thought this mattered to the wellbeing of the people
> of
> Nova Roma....'before' I trouble to begin the process of opening the matter
> up
> for a public vote."
>
> F. Galerius Aurelianus
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46190 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: Patrem Auctoritas
Cato Equitio Marino Octavio Pio SPD.

Salvete viri.

The problem, gentlemen, is one of the "ends justifying the means".
The ends in this instance - that of having the consuls ask the Senate
what they think of an issue (the "patrem auctoritas" to which the
censor refers) - is perfectly reasonable.

The "means" - the call for the Senate to "adopt" amendments and then
ask the comitia to "approve" them, is against the law. Perhaps it is
entirely a matter of wording, of how this was presented. But the
careless use of language is not acceptable, particularly and
especially when you are dealing with the law - the kind of "well,
everyone should know what I meant instead of picking on what I
*wrote*" attitude is legally negligent both within our Republic and in
the great world outside the Republic. Practicality require precision
in execution as well as desire.

It is this kind of legal negligence which has been to a great extent
the cause of the swollen state of the tabularium to begin with.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46191 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Salve Romans

Not only are the Consuls acting in good faith in asking the opinion of the Senate
but constitutional amendments have ALREADY been adopted using both methods.

Amendments have been adopted in which the Comitia Centuriata voted first and the Senate
ratified them after the vote but amendments have also been approved by the Senate and then placed
before the Comitia Centuriata.

While we may well want to have the Comitia Centuriata vote first and have the Senate
ratify them after the Comitia Centuriata has voted, nothing in the constitution prevents the Consuls
from asking the advise of the Senate on any issue at any time.

Could the notice have been written differently so as not to cause alarm, maybe
but I believe the Consuls were and are acting in good faith.

Every time a magistrate writes something it is not, in fact an attempt to subvert the constitution.

I also believe that with 96 hours of debate changes will be made to the proposals,
and having heeded the Senate's advice the final amendments will be ready for the
Comitia Centuriata to adopt.

Finally the Senate can give its advice on any matter and at any time it deems fit to do so.


Nova Roman Constitution

V. The Senate
The supreme policy-making authority for Nova Roma shall be embodied in its Senate. The album Senatorum (list of Senators) shall be maintained by the censors according to qualifications set by law. The Senate shall have the following honors, powers, and obligations:

A. As the repository of experience and wisdom in the affairs of State, the Senate shall have the authority to issue Senatus consulta (advice of the Senate) on those topics upon which it shall see fit to comment. ....

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetor et Senator


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46192 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Salve Praetor,

<On <file://\\<On> 10/10/06, Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
<Amendments have been adopted in which the Comitia Centuriata voted first
and the Senate
<ratified them after the vote but amendments have also been approved by the
Senate and then placed
<before the Comitia Centuriata.

You took the words right out of my mouth. The Senate has done this before. I
don't quite understand this about NR that one year, no one says a peep and
the next there are a dozen emails about this or that being unconstitutional
when the same citizens are here.

Honestly I think a few citizens are nit-picking.

Valed,
Diana


> .
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46193 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
> Cato Marco Octavio sal.
>
> "The Senate votes on what to advance to the Comitia..."
>
> Where on earth (or more appropriately, in our law) do you find this?

Where do you find anything that says we cannot?

The Senate can discuss and vote on whatever it likes. The consuls
are effectively asking the Senate "which of these are likely to
survive when we begin the usual constitution-changing process?"

The Senate is an advisory body. This is exactly what we're here for.

> And you wonder why I show concern over the legal structure of the
> Republic?

Concern? "Hysteria" is the word that I'd use. You and Caesar
are harassing the consul with ridiculous accusations of
unconstitutionality and illegality even after it's been repeatedly
explained to you that this is a preliminary vote, and that the
process outlined in the law will happen later.

But it's election season, and you need to score some points, so
you've invented a controversy where none exists.

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46194 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Cato Marco Octavio sal.

Salve Marcus Octavius.

You wrote:

"The consuls are effectively asking the Senate 'which of these are
likely to survive when we begin the usual constitution-changing process?'"

No, the consuls are presenting amendments to the Constitution to the
Senate to be voted upon for adoption. That is what the clear language
of the call to convene states. There was no mention of voting by the
comitia, only of the adopted amendments being presented to the comitia
for their "approval" - in English, the equivalent of ratification, not
voting for adoption.

You seem to be arguing that I am opposed to the Senate reviewing these
proposed amendments and offering their advice to the consul(s); that
is entirely incorrect, and that argument can end once and for all. I
am opposed to the deliberative body of the Senate taking on the
legislative powers that are reserved for the People.

Octavius, not only has Iulius Caesar not declared his candidacy for
any office, but I certainly do not need to "score points"; I say what
I think. I have argued against this exact same kind of sloppiness no
matter whether there was an election looming or not, and I will
continue to do so whether I am elected or not.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46195 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Lucius Arminius Faustus for Consul of Nova Roma
Salve Romans

After careful consideration I come before you to endorse the
candidacy of

Lucius Arminius Faustus for Consul of Nova Roma.

I do so for a number of reasons.

The first is that Lucius Arminius Faustus and I have history. We
have served together as Tribunes. We have had some lively
discussions and even some heated arguments but we kept them within
the confines of the Tribunes list.

We discussed topics and issues and did not let personalities get in
the way of us doing our jobs.

Did I like everything he said or did? NO. Did he like everything I
said and did NO. But we were able to disagree without being
disagreeable.

If you elect Lucius Arminius Faustus and myself Consuls we will work
together very well. Our disagreement will be private and our
agreements based on mutual respect and considerable discussion. If
I have an idea for legislation or where to hold a Nova Roman
conclave you will not see it until I have convinced my colleague of
its merits and it will then be our proposal not just mine.

My second reason is that the two of us have in the last number of
years followed a correct path along the Cursus Honorum we have
kept to the traditions of Rome and Nova Roma. Lucius Arminius
Faustus has served as Praetor, Propraetor of Brasilia, Tribunus
Plebis, Aedilis Plebis and Quaestor and is a member of the Senate.

We both believe it was important to do so. As I said in my campaign
statement there are candidates that have not followed the Cursus
Honorum and as the electorate you must decide which was the proper
avenue of service.

Another reason I am endorsing his candidacy is that together we have
110 months of uninterrupted citizenship and service. At least to my
mind staying and working for the betterment of the Res publica is
better than coming and going and coming again.


On the other candidates

Marcus Moravius Piscinus Horatianus, is in my opinion a
good and decent man and will make a fine Nova Roman magistrate
someday.

But as a citizen, voter and magistrate, I do not think a
single full term as Tribune is enough for elevation to the
Consulship. No matter how many offices one holds in other Roman
groups, the service that counts or at least should count is that to
Nova Roma.

While none of us would be here without it and nothing can diminish
the vision of our co-founder Flavius Vedius Germanicus, we also
know that no child can grow into an independent adult if our parents
are always there to rescue us.

Nova Roma like Rome must at sometime be able to stand on it owns and
not always hope our Romulus is waiting in the wings to fix our
mistakes.

We honor Flavius Vedius Germanicus for the vision that is Nova Roma
and believe that a person who has served as Consul twice and Censor
three times has nothing left to prove. He should be honored as the
Princeps Senatus, a role far more suited to his experience than just
another term as Consul.

I will therefore be voting for our future while still respecting
our past.

I respectfully ask that you do the same. Please vote for

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus and Lucius Arminius Faustus for Consuls

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Candidate for Consul
Mea gloria fideles
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46196 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Salvete Romani, Quirites et omnes

I really must say that I agree entirely with Praetor Galerius here.

The Tribuni Plebis have been called upon to review the agenda
presented by the Consules to the Senate. I do not find anything in
their action that warrants the intervention of the Tribuni Plebis.
Rather it seems to me that a good deal of fuss has been raised by
misreading into their words what I consider baseless assumptions on
their intentions and on the legislative process.

The Senate can in fact "adopt" a proposal. By issuing a senatus
consultus on any proposal the Senate extends its Patrem auctoritas to
the measure, as stated by Censor Marinus. The Senate is not a
legislative body in the general sense of meaning and its senatus
consultus on any proposed legislative matter is only the collective
opinion of the Senate on a given issue. The historical role of the
Senate was to arrive at a consensus of its diverse members, and then
by announcing its opinion in a senatus consultus it extended its
Patrem auctoritas (ie. approval) of a proposal to be present to a
Comitia. This traditional function of the Senate seems to be
neglected at times in Nova Roma, but certainly the Consules call upon
the Senate to fulfill its historical role is in no way a violation of
the Nova Roma Constitution. The Senate, as the Board of Directors of
Nova Roma, Inc, also has some administrative responsibilities over
finances and certain appointments, so a senatus consultus on such
administrative matters can be seen as a corporate directive. Only in
the matter of amending the Constitution might one say the Senate
takes on a legislative role in that it has to ratify a constitutional
amendment approved by the Comitia Centuriate. Obviously, though, the
Senate cannot "ratify" what has not first been passed by the Comitia
Centuriata. Common use of the language and common sense
distinguishes a difference. "Adopt" and "ratify" do not mean the same
thing under the circumstances over which this unnecessary and
pointless argument is needlessly being continued.

Valete optime
M Moravius Piscinus
Tribunus Plebis


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Romans
>
> Not only are the Consuls acting in good faith in asking the opinion
of the Senate
> but constitutional amendments have ALREADY been adopted using both
methods.
>
> Amendments have been adopted in which the Comitia Centuriata voted
first and the Senate
> ratified them after the vote but amendments have also been approved
by the Senate and then placed
> before the Comitia Centuriata.
>
> While we may well want to have the Comitia Centuriata vote first
and have the Senate
> ratify them after the Comitia Centuriata has voted, nothing in the
constitution prevents the Consuls
> from asking the advise of the Senate on any issue at any time.
>
> Could the notice have been written differently so as not to cause
alarm, maybe
> but I believe the Consuls were and are acting in good faith.
>
> Every time a magistrate writes something it is not, in fact an
attempt to subvert the constitution.
>
> I also believe that with 96 hours of debate changes will be made to
the proposals,
> and having heeded the Senate's advice the final amendments will be
ready for the
> Comitia Centuriata to adopt.
>
> Finally the Senate can give its advice on any matter and at any
time it deems fit to do so.
>
>
> Nova Roman Constitution
>
> V. The Senate
> The supreme policy-making authority for Nova Roma shall be embodied
in its Senate. The album Senatorum (list of Senators) shall be
maintained by the censors according to qualifications set by law. The
Senate shall have the following honors, powers, and obligations:
>
> A. As the repository of experience and wisdom in the affairs of
State, the Senate shall have the authority to issue Senatus consulta
(advice of the Senate) on those topics upon which it shall see fit to
comment. ....
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Praetor et Senator
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46197 From: Ben Radcliffe Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Salvete Omnes,

I'll try not to take side, but I'd like to present why I think this argument isn't being resolved: the conversation has diverged into two separate arguments. The Consuls and others have been arguing that the Senate has the right to convene to discuss any matter, including the Constitutional amendments. I think that we all agree with this.

But Cato and the Tribune are arguing that the specific language used when this matter was first announced was severely flawed. The language clearly implied that the Senate would ratify the document and ask the Comitia for approval, which is reverse of what the constitution requires.

I don't think that the language is very important as long as the spirit of the law is met, but I'm not legally minded and perhaps more care should be used when addressing constitutional amendments. In any case, the Consuls obviously did not mean to make it sound that way and Cato is just pointing out an initial flaw.
I apologize if I'm completely mistaken,

Valete Optime,
Ap. Vipsanius Ahenobarbus


---------------------------------
Get your email and more, right on the new Yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46198 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Cato Moravio Piscino sal.

"'Adopt' and 'ratify' do not mean the same thing..."

Quod erat demonstrandum. You make my argument for me, Moravius Piscinus.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46199 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS ????
Cato Ap. Vipsanio Ahenobarbo sal.

Salve Vipsanius Ahenobarbus.

You are correct. It is the attention to such details as correct
language that make a great deal of difference in regards to the law.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46200 From: legio_vi_tribunis Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul
After much deliberation and reading the statements made by our
esteemed candidates for Consul, I have chosen to endorse Tiberius for
Consul. Not only has Tiberius stated a need for social and economic
reform but also a need to expand beyond an virtual existance.
Tiberius ideas on a Conclave and a "living history" site are just what
NR needs to draw more people in. It is one thing to have a strong and
structured internet society, but people will want more, namely myself.
I have been affiliated with living history in the past and seen how
well it works. Tiberius is not only a strong supporter of the
Republic and NR, but since he is a history teacher it shows his
dedication to a past long gone. He is physically strong, mentally
awake and morally straight. All virtues needed to be a good consul.
I urge all the cives of the California province and around the
Republic to cast a strong vote for Tiberius, as he will see that we
prosper.

Marcus Pontius Sejanus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46201 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
F. Galerius Aurelianus Tb. Galerio Pauline. Salve, cousin.

I believe that the problem in this situation has less to do with the convention of the Senate to "discuss" the language of the proposed amendments before presenting them to the Comitia for ratification than the manner in which the Consuls are handling the queries from the citizens. I voted for both of the current consuls because, as of the last election, I felt they would do the best job for Nova Roma. However, I have come to believe that they do not handle any sort of criticism or question very well.
This most recent topic shows that neither of the consuls appear to have the ability to react calmly and rationally to a question of their actions but instead responded with implied sarcasm, autocratic remarks, and really got their backs up. Either of the consuls could have admitted to a mistake in the words used and attempted to resolve the issue privately but that is not the way it played out. I, like many Nova Romans, want to believe in the good intentions of our magistrates but experience has taught us differently.

Your post is a measured and rational response that illustrates that there have been prior errors made in the procedural policy and shows that the current consuls have lost the ability to differentiate between a personal attack and a political question. I hope that the next year will see the elected magistrates of Nova Roma recognize that our organization needs major restructuring to insure its survival and growth in the future.

Vadite in pace Cereris.


-----Original Message-----
From: spqr753@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 5:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS


Salve Romans

Not only are the Consuls acting in good faith in asking the opinion of the
Senate
but constitutional amendments have ALREADY been adopted using both methods.

Amendments have been adopted in which the Comitia Centuriata voted first and the
Senate
ratified them after the vote but amendments have also been approved by the
Senate and then placed
before the Comitia Centuriata.

While we may well want to have the Comitia Centuriata vote first and have the
Senate
ratify them after the Comitia Centuriata has voted, nothing in the constitution
prevents the Consuls
from asking the advise of the Senate on any issue at any time.

Could the notice have been written differently so as not to cause alarm, maybe
but I believe the Consuls were and are acting in good faith.

Every time a magistrate writes something it is not, in fact an attempt to
subvert the constitution.

I also believe that with 96 hours of debate changes will be made to the
proposals,
and having heeded the Senate's advice the final amendments will be ready for the

Comitia Centuriata to adopt.

Finally the Senate can give its advice on any matter and at any time it deems
fit to do so.


Nova Roman Constitution

V. The Senate
The supreme policy-making authority for Nova Roma shall be embodied in its
Senate. The album Senatorum (list of Senators) shall be maintained by the
censors according to qualifications set by law. The Senate shall have the
following honors, powers, and obligations:

A. As the repository of experience and wisdom in the affairs of State, the
Senate shall have the authority to issue Senatus consulta (advice of the Senate)
on those topics upon which it shall see fit to comment. ....

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetor et Senator


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Yahoo! Groups Links







________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46202 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
> F. Galerius Aurelianus Tb. Galerio Pauline. Salve, cousin.
>
> However, I have come to believe that they do not handle any
> sort of criticism or question very well.

How would you expect anyone to handle an all-caps shout of
"UNCONSTITUTIONAL"?

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46203 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Another candidate for Tribune
I think I might be the only one who received this announcement.


>From: "pulvillus" <pulvillus@...>
>To: vipsaniusagrippa@...
>Subject: Anouncement of Canidacy
>Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:09:36 -0000
>
>I would like to announce my canidacy for the office of Tribunas
>Plebis I have been a member in good standing of Nova Roma since the
>14th of Jan 2006 and very much wish to serve Nova Roma in this
>office.I will do the best I can if elected. vale Tiberius Octavius
>Pulvillus.
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46204 From: Claudio Guzzo Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: salvete
magni mali cantio
Vale
ACC
mlcinnyc@... gequitiuscato
wrote Sun Oct 8, 2006 2:21 am (PST)
Cato D. Svetonio Lupo sal.

Well, it should be "Nova Eboracum, Nova Eboracum" :-)

Vale bene,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, mike orley <clannadh@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes !
>
> I guess my next question should be: if the popular Poet Francesco
Sinatra lived, would he have cut a record entitled "Eboracvm,
Eboracvum." ?
>
> Vale,
> Decimvs Svetonivs Lvpe.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46205 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Salve Octavi.

Rationally, calmly, in a measured way.

These are all traits of an effective magistrate and are in fact
traits of a good leader or manager in any discipline.

Vale
Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> wrote:
>
>
> > F. Galerius Aurelianus Tb. Galerio Pauline. Salve, cousin.
> >
> > However, I have come to believe that they do not handle any
> > sort of criticism or question very well.
>
> How would you expect anyone to handle an all-caps shout of
> "UNCONSTITUTIONAL"?
>
> Vale, Octavius.
>
> --
> Marcus Octavius Gracchus
> octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com
>
> "What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
> clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
> over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46206 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
F. Galerius Aurelianus M. Octavius Gracchus. Salve.

I expect and desire that elected magistrates do not respond in a snippy manner on the ML to questions about their official actions. Capital letters are not actual the equivalent of physical in-your-face screaming. No unpleasant words were used in the initial emails and one reads what one wants into any post unless certain specific words are used; such as impetuous or presumptuous. Anyone who runs for an elected position in any organization has to expect to receive questions, criticism, and (of course) insults. If one cannot stand the heat, one should stay away from the fornax.

Vale.



-----Original Message-----
From: hucke@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS



> F. Galerius Aurelianus Tb. Galerio Pauline. Salve, cousin.
>
> However, I have come to believe that they do not handle any
> sort of criticism or question very well.

How would you expect anyone to handle an all-caps shout of
"UNCONSTITUTIONAL"?

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese



Yahoo! Groups Links







________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46207 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Salve Flavi Galeri,

> I expect and desire that elected magistrates do not respond in a
> snippy manner... Anyone who runs for an elected position in any
> organization has to expect to receive questions, criticism, and
> (of course) insults.

True, but it seems that here, insults and criticism are the
natural response of some to absolutely everything. If, instead
of "UNCONSTITUTIONAL", the original poster had simply said "I
think you're doing these steps in the wrong order", the Consuls
would have replied in kind. When directed at a magistrate,
"UNCONSTITUTIONAL" can be perceived as a "fightin' word".

I've spoken with both of our present consuls on several occasions,
and met one of them, and don't think either to be the type that
responds inappropriately to innocent inquiries. I think they're
frustrated with the constant negativity that is hurled at
them. Instead of debating the merits of their proposals,
they've been sucked into debates on what verb they should
use when asking the Senate to consider something.

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46208 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
Cato P. Minuciae Straboni quiritibusque SPD.

Salve consul et salvete omnes.

One disturbing train of thought that has recurred in this discussion
can be seen in the following:

"To expand, if the Senators don't like what's on the table, why
bother comitia over items they will hardly ratify, as they never
agreed with them in the first place?" - P. Minucia Strabo

Because, consul, if the amendments are passed by the People in
comitia, would the Senate dare to oppose the spoken will of the People
and refuse to ratify them? It is not up to the Senate to decide the
laws under which we live in the Republic, it is the will of the People
which is supreme - even the lex Constitutiva itself exists at the
sufferance of the People. The Senate and magistrates derive their
authority by the will of the People, not the other way around.

"As he [the consul Publius Valerius] entered, the 'fasces' were
lowered, to the great delight of the multitude, who understood that it
was to them that they were lowered as an open avowal that the dignity
and might of the people were greater than those of the consul." Livy,
History of Rome 2.7

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46209 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Senatus Populusque Romanus
Salve Cato

Consul P. Minucia Strabo said "To expand, if the Senators don't like what's on the table, why
bother comitia over items they will hardly ratify, as they never
agreed with them in the first place?"

Cato "Because, consul, if the amendments are passed by the People in
comitia, would the Senate dare to oppose the spoken will of the People
and refuse to ratify them? "

Yes Cato the Senate could and in some cases should oppose what the people adopt.

The same constitution that outlines that the people must vote to adopt constitutional amendments also REQUIRES that the Senate agree to them before they take effect. It also requires that 2/3 of the Senate approve them.

The Senate is not a rubber stamp it is

"The supreme policy-making authority for Nova Roma ."

.As the repository of experience and wisdom in the affairs of State, the Senate shall have the authority to issue Senatus consulta (advice of the Senate) on those topics upon which it shall see fit to comment..

It an example of the old Roman system of checks and balances.

In Nova Roma as in Rome it is

Senatus Populusque Romanus ("The Senate and the Roman People")

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46210 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: THE SENATE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
> Cato P. Minuciae Straboni quiritibusque SPD.

> Because, consul, if the amendments are passed by the People in
> comitia, would the Senate dare to oppose the spoken will of the People
> and refuse to ratify them?

Yes. See the archives for this January. It happened, more than once.

Not everything should be decided by popular vote. Senators are experienced,
have been around for a long time, know the long-term plans, and often have
more in-depth knowledge of how a system works. We are not automatons.

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46211 From: Lucius Iunius Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: De Principe Senatus
Iunius quiritibus sal.

Has Nova Roma resurrected the office of princeps senatus? If not, why not?

Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46212 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: Senatus Populusque Romanus
Cato T. Galerio Paulino sal.

Salve praetor.

You wrote:

"Yes Cato the Senate could and in some cases should oppose what the
people adopt."

Yet we read from Polybius:

"Again it is the People who bestow office on the deserving, the
noblest regard of virtue in a state; the People have the power of
approving or rejecting laws...The Senate again, which possesses such
great power, is obliged in the first place to pay attention to the
commons in public affairs and respect the wishes of the People...and
it cannot carry out inquiries...and their correction, unless the
senatus consultum is confirmed by the People." - Polybius, Histories
VI.14.4, 16.1-2(ed.)

My fear, praetor, is a little too much "Senatus" and a little too
little "Populusque".

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46213 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Perspectives on Nova Roma
Salvete omnes,

There is a real difference in people, and this difference is especially
highlighted in how they approach, and view, our fair Republic of Nova Roma.

There are those who look at Nova Roma and see problems that are in need
of fixing. They see little but flaws, perceived injustices, and abuses
of power and procedure. Such people immediately rush to the conclusion
that the Republic is inherently broken, both structurally and in terms
of how those who are in positions of leadership exercise that authority.
They are usually strident to the point of shrillness about their points.
Such people usually eschew positions of authority themselves, preferring
to snipe from the sidelines. When they do rise to office, they spend
their time "fixing" all the myriad problems they find, mostly because
with such a point of view, all they see are problems in need of fixing.
These people I name the plangerii ("those who bewail"; forgive my
atrocious Latin; something else in need of "fixing", no doubt.)

Then there are those who look at Nova Roma and see fertile ground for
potential growth, directions into which new movement can take place, and
opportunities for change along the historical course that we charted at
Nova Roma's founding. They approach problems as opportunities, and have
a perspective that invites new and innovative initiatives. They possess
bold visions aimed at using our existing structures and assets, and
inventing new ones, to move us towards a positive goal. Such people seek
out office. When their drive and zeal is recognized and rewarded, they
spend their time posing new initiatives and taking the Republic into
bold new directions, because they see opportunities and potential. These
people I name gaudii ("those who are joyous", I hope).

The distinction between the plangerii and the gaudii is perhaps a subtle
one, borne of attitude. But to those who are themselves gaudii, it is a
white-hot sigil, emblazoned across every email sent by a plangerii. It
is not the content of the proposals which bears the mark. It is the way
they are presented. The motive that directs them. One is simply negative
and pessimistic, the other positive and optimistic.

Is there a need for more face-to-face meetings? The gaudii propose new
supports and structures be put in place to support doing so. The
plangerii blame a dysfunctional system and want to "fix" it.

Is there a popular perception that we have too many laws? The gaudii
propose to focus on action (leading by example) rather than laws. The
plangerii blame the laws themselves and want to "fix" them.

Is there a potential procedural problem with a vote? The gaudii give the
benefit of the doubt, see the perceived flaw acknowledged and corrected,
and move on. The plangerii see conspiracies to grab power and demand
that the Tribunes "fix" the problem.

No one need tout themselves as a gaudus or a plangerus, because it's
obvious to all who are observant.

Valete,

Flavius Vedius Germanicus
Pater Patriae
Consular
Senator

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Flavius_Vedius_Germanicus_(Election_MMDCCLIX)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46214 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: Perspectives on Nova Roma
Salve Germanice,

An interesting post.

Nova Roma today is shaped around the framework you co-designed. This
is a res publica and as such it requires rules which we call laws.
Like a number of people from all sides of the opinion spectrum I too
am concerned that any laws passed should be relevant and well
written. Frankly I couldn't care less if the Tabularium was stuffed
to the rafters with laws as long as they met those two requirements.

What should be a concern is that our laws are not bent, twisted,
broken, swept under the carpet temporarily or discarded, without due
process. Partly because of the existence of a Constitution that in
significant areas has proved to be muddled, contradictory and un-
historic, we have had various debates on this list about its meaning
and application. Some of the disagreements have also been over laws,
actual and proposed. Frequently the same thread runs throughout,
namely poor drafting.

As long as we claim to be a res publica, indeed as long as we have
any structure that requires "rules" I will hold those responsible for
its administration to the letter of the Constitution and laws. We all
have a duty to be watchdogs. Give an inch and a government will take
a mile. Allow one "error" and you establish a precedent for
future "errors". One ounce of liberty lost leads to a pound sooner or
later. Now of course there is a limit to what can be done to "harm"
us here, but restrictions on what we can do, what we cannot, when we
are consulted and when we are not is a form of "harm".

As to conspiracies, no Germanice I see none. Why? That would require
planning, coordination and efficiency. I see little of that. Sitting
on the sidelines? No Germanice I am not sitting on the sidelines, but
equally I will not just automatically doff my cap to someone because
they wear the pointy hat of office. Putting the hat on ones head is
easy, wearing it with style and panache is another. On some the hat
looks like a hat, on others it looks like an upturned bucket. I give
respect when I see it is earned. I support practical initiatives to
see Nova Roma grow, but expecting people to become a docile mass
while the "great and the good" try to figure out how to get the
bucket off their head or how it got there in the first place is
unrealistic.

So feel free to slap any label you want on me, but ensure that if you
are elected you read the Constitution, read the laws and act
judiciously. Ensure your edicts and announcements are clear and
unambiguous for if they are not I will be there to call attention to
them, as is my right as a citizen. As to your categories, one can be
a joyous buffoon and an efficient and correct pessimist. I label
myself a realist, for I realistically know what to expect from all
the players in this "drama".

You could of course propose dismantling your creation, the res
publica, and turn us into just another email list where we all sit
around the virtual campfire congratulating each other and playing
pass the pointy hat. Until such time as that happens and there are
laws, even if there is only one, I will do my best to drawn attention
to infractions. I didn't join a dictatorship, I joined a republic and
my expectation, as every citizen's should be, is that our "leaders"
play by the rules meticulously, not that they wave them away
contemptuously when it suits or interferes in some plan, nor that
they down play inaccuracies or inconsistencies in the application of
due process. In short that they follow a straight course and thereby
respect the community that passed these laws.

As I said, an interesting post, but then it is election time.

Vale
Cn. Iulius Caesar


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Flavius Vedius Germanicus
<germanicus@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> There is a real difference in people, and this difference is
especially
> highlighted in how they approach, and view, our fair Republic of
Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46215 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: Re: Senatus Populusque Romanus
Salve Cato Amice

It is always a balancing act in a mixed government. The Consuls
represent the kingly power but only for one year and are subject to
the Tribunes veto and public condemnation . The Senate represents
the aristocratic element of the state but have no law making
authority just the influence of life's experience. In Nova Roma we
use the Senate as a check on the people and vice versa. The Tribunes
and the CPT represent the democratic element.

And while it took time to build all in all it worked for Rome for
centuries

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
>
> Cato T. Galerio Paulino sal.
>
> Salve praetor.
>
> You wrote:
>
> "Yes Cato the Senate could and in some cases should oppose what the
> people adopt."
>
> Yet we read from Polybius:
>
> "Again it is the People who bestow office on the deserving, the
> noblest regard of virtue in a state; the People have the power of
> approving or rejecting laws...The Senate again, which possesses
such
> great power, is obliged in the first place to pay attention to the
> commons in public affairs and respect the wishes of the
People...and
> it cannot carry out inquiries...and their correction, unless the
> senatus consultum is confirmed by the People." - Polybius,
Histories
> VI.14.4, 16.1-2(ed.)
>
> My fear, praetor, is a little too much "Senatus" and a little too
> little "Populusque".
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46216 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-10-10
Subject: The Senate, the Constitution, and small letters vs BIG LETTERS.
Salve Gracchus,

Elected officials of any stripe have to expect to insults and criticism
because they have asked their constituents to elect them to office so that they
can serve those same constituents. I agree that our magistrates are no more
than human and have the same emotions and expectations of anyone else.
However much that may be true, public officers of a government or organization are
also expected to act with more restraint and more control. I have
communicated with both consuls, privately and publicly, and in the case of one, by
telephone and in person. I hold a different opinion of them than I did a year
ago. As long as they hold office, they hold office at the pleasure of the
members of an organization or the citizens of a political body not just their own
feelings.
Whether or not something is posted as UNCONSTITUTIONAL or unconstitutional
should be meaningless when it comes down to an inconsistent approach to THE
RULES or THE BY-LAWS. Someone simply stated their belief that a matter was not
being handled according to the rules of the organization. It doesn't matter
if the rules have not been followed properly at some other time and ignored;
what matters is that a member voiced an objection and the officer handled it
badly.
I don't like the rules or by-laws of Nova Roma as they currently exist.
Some are downright silly while others border on little children playing Night
Court. The entire body of leges relating to slander, libel, and most of the
other "crimes" is ridiculous. An on-line organization needs moderators with
the ability to tell a member to shut up or be moderated. An on-line
organization needs to be able to just dump someone who is detrimental to the
organization.
As a governor of a Nova Roman province, I have absolutely no legal control
over anybody except to boot them off the provincial weblist or delete offensive
material (like dating spam). Ordinary good sense has to be the prevailing
rule when dealing with people whether in person or on the Net.
Strabo Consul posted some snippy remarks to a citizen who objected to her
calling the Senate in a certain manner; some citizens & magistrates defended
her and others furthered the objections. We now have a good idea that her
initial remarks were merely badly worded but no offense was meant nor was she
trying to deliberately circumvent the rules or our consitution. Some offense
WAS obviously meant in some of her responses.
Ordinary good sense proposal--I apologize to Strabo Consul for posting that
she is snippy, autocratic, and defensive. I suggest she apologize to the
citizen that she called presumptuous & then tried to shut down. I suggest the
Senate review the proposed amendments and make what changes they think are
appropriate; present the original amendments & the changes to the Comitia; the
Comitia reviews and approves or rejects the amendments; and the Senate votes
to ratify or not. Any Senator who is running for office will hopefully vote
in such a way that the members of the Comitia will not be pissed off and vote
for their opponent (providing ratification takes place before the election).
Nova Roma votes in some new officers who will do something about our
complete mess of by-laws and finds a balance between history and ordinary good
sense. Everybody is unhappy about something, but can live with it for a while,
and we move on to the next argument.

F. Galerius Aurelianus

Salve Flavi Galeri,

> I expect and desire that elected magistrates do not respond in a
> snippy manner... Anyone who runs for an elected position in any
> organization has to expect to receive questions, criticism, and
> (of course) insults.

True, but it seems that here, insults and criticism are the
natural response of some to absolutely everything. If, instead
of "UNCONSTITUTIONAL", the original poster had simply said "I
think you're doing these steps in the wrong order", the Consuls
would have replied in kind. When directed at a magistrate,
"UNCONSTITUTIONAL" can be perceived as a "fightin' word".

I've spoken with both of our present consuls on several occasions,
and met one of them, and don't think either to be the type that
responds inappropriately to innocent inquiries. I think they're
frustrated with the constant negativity that is hurled at
them. Instead of debating the merits of their proposals,
they've been sucked into debates on what verb they should
use when asking the Senate to consider something.

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46217 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: De Principe Senatus
Salve Luci Iuni, et salvete quirites,

Lucius Iunius <iunius_verbosus@...> writes:

> Iunius quiritibus sal.
>
> Has Nova Roma resurrected the office of princeps senatus? If not, why not?

Princips Senatus was never an office. It was an honor accorded the oldest
patrician senator who had served as consul and censor.

During my consulship I refered to L. Equitius Cincinnatus as "princips
senatus" at times during Senate meetings. He's currently the person who best
qualifies for the honor. It doesn't really mean anything in terms of
additional power, rather it is recognition of someone who is first among
equals.

Vale, et valete,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46218 From: jerichomyles2002 Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Open positions
Regarding elections.. where would one find out all open positions? Is there a central list of
what positions will be up for voting?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46219 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Open positions
Salve

Yes

Go to the Wiki site and look upper right and you will see a listing on the current election. Open that and you will see all the candidates and what is open.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


----- Original Message -----
From: jerichomyles2002<mailto:jerichomyles2002@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 12:15 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Open positions


Regarding elections.. where would one find out all open positions? Is there a central list of
what positions will be up for voting?





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46220 From: marcushoratius Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Call for Plebeian Candidates Now Closed
Salvete Quirites omnes

The period for announcing candidacies for the Plebeian offices of
Tribunus Plebis and Aedilis Plebis closed at Midnight 10 Oct. 2006.

Official candidates for the office of Tribunus Plebis are:

C. Arminius Reccanullus
Q. Servilius Priscus
M. Curiatius Complutensis
M. Pontius Sejanus

A declaration of candidacy has also been tendered to the Tribuni
Plebis by T. Octavius Pulvillus. We shall wait to confirm whether he
meets the requirements of office before acknowledging his candidacy.

For the office of Aedilis Plebis C. Curius Saturninus stands as an
official candidate.

We give our thanks to these Citizens for standing forth as
candidates. May the Gods watch over them and over our Res Publica
Libera

Valete optime
M Moravius Piscinus
Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46221 From: Lucius Iunius Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: De Principe Senatus
Iunius Marino Censor sal.

Even if it was not an office, I'd been under the impression that the position carried with it
certain prerogatives during the time of the late Republic. Was I mistaken?

Vale.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Luci Iuni, et salvete quirites,
>
> Lucius Iunius <iunius_verbosus@...> writes:
>
> > Iunius quiritibus sal.
> >
> > Has Nova Roma resurrected the office of princeps senatus? If not, why not?
>
> Princips Senatus was never an office. It was an honor accorded the oldest
> patrician senator who had served as consul and censor.
>
> During my consulship I refered to L. Equitius Cincinnatus as "princips
> senatus" at times during Senate meetings. He's currently the person who best
> qualifies for the honor. It doesn't really mean anything in terms of
> additional power, rather it is recognition of someone who is first among
> equals.
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46222 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: a.d. V Id. Oct.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem V Idus Octobris; haec dies nefastus publicus est.

"Nowhere was there ever a general who endeared himself more to his
soldiers by cheerfully sharing every duty with the humblest of his men
In the military sports when the soldiers got up contests of speed and
strength among them- selves he was equally ready to win or to lose,
and never thought any man unworthy to be his antagonist. He showed
practical kindness as circumstances required; in his language he was
not less mindful of other men's liberty than of his own dignity, and
what made him most popular was that he displayed the same qualities in
discharging the duties of his office which he had shown as a candidate
for it. Following up their commander's words, the whole army marched
out of camp with extraordinary alacrity. In no battle that was ever
fought did men engage with strength more equally matched, or more
assured hopes of victory on both sides, or a stronger spirit of
self-confidence unaccompanied, however, by any feeling of contempt for
their opponents. The fighting temper of the Samnites was roused by
their recent achieve- ments and the double victory won a few days
previously; the Romans on the other hand were inspired by their
glorious record of four centuries of victory reaching back to the
founda- tion of the City. But each side felt some anxiety at meeting a
new and untried foe. The battle was an index to their feelings; for
some time they fought so resolutely that neither line showed any signs
of giving way. At length the consul, seeing that the Samnites could
not be repulsed by steady fighting, determined to try the effect of a
sudden shock and launched his cavalry at them. This made no
impression, and as he watched them wheeling round in the narrow space
between the opposing armies after their ineffective charge, having
utterly failed to penetrate the enemy's line, he rode back to the
front ranks of the legions, and after dismounting said: `Soldiers,
this task belongs to us infantry. Come on! Wherever you see me making
my way through the enemy's lines with my sword follow, and each of you
do his best to cut down those in front. All that ground which is now
glittering with uplifted spears you shall see cleared by a vast
carnage.' During those words the cavalry, at the consul's order,
retired an both flanks, leaving the centre clear for the legions. The
consul led the charge, and slew the first man he engaged with. Fired
at the sight, every man, right and left, charged straight forward and
began a fight to be re- membered. The Samnites did not flinch, though
they were receiving more wounds than they inflicted.

The battle had now gone on for a considerable time; there was a
terrible slaughter round the Samnite standards but no signs of flight
anywhere, so resolved were they that death alone should be their
conqueror. The Romans began to find their strength failing through
fatigue and not much daylight remained, so goaded on by rage and
disappointment they flung themselves madly upon their foe. Then for
the first time the Samnites were seen to be giving ground and
preparing to flee; they were being taken prisoners and killed in all
directions, and not many would have survived had not night put an end
to what was becoming a victory rather than a battle. The Romans
admitted that they had never fought with a more obstinate enemy, and
when the Samnites were asked what it was that first turned them, with
all their determination, to flight, they said that the eyes of the
Romans looked like fire, and their faces and expression like those of
madmen; it was this more than anything else which filled them with
terror. This terror showed itself not only in the result of the battle
but also in their hurrying away in the night. The next day the Romans
took possession of their empty camp, and all the popula- tion of Capua
came out there to congratulate them." - Livy, History of Rome 7.33


"Octobri mense Meditrinalia dies dictus a medendo, quod Flaccus flamen
Martialis dicebat hoc die solitum vinum novum et vetus libari et
degustari medicamenti causa; quod facere solent etiam nunc multi cum
dicunt: 'Novum vetus vinum bibo: novo veteri morbo medeor'."
(The day of the Meditrinalia in month October was named from 'mederi'
[to be healed], as Flamen Martialis Flaccus used to say that on this
day it was the custom to make a libation of new and old wine and to
taste it in order to be healed. Many are accustomed to do this even
now when they say: "Wine new and old I drink, of illness new and old
I'm cured.") - Varro, De Lingua Latina 6.21


"Si deus si dea es qui Meditrinaliae tutelam habet, quod tibi hodie
fieri oportet libationem vini novi et veteri, eius rei ergo macte hoc
vino novo et veteri pollucenda esto." (Be you god or goddess who has
the tutelage of the Meditrinalia, as it is proper to offer to you
today a libation of wine new and old, for sake of this shall you be
honoured by this offering of wine new and old.)- A. Gryllus Graecus
(NR) in honor of the Meditrinalia

Today is the first day of the Meditrinalia; the celebration of the new
wine harvest. In drinking the new wine it was customary to pronounce
the words: "vetus novum vinum bibo, novo veteri morbo medeor." It is
thought that this celebration was initially dedicated to Iuppiter
Himself, although a shadowy "Meditrina" ("healer") was associated with
the festival by the 2nd century grammarian Sextus Pompeius Festus, on
the basis of which she is asserted to be the Roman goddess of health,
longevity and wine in some modern sources. Iuppiter's involvement can
be construed from Ovid's words in the Fasti describing the Vinalia of
a.d. IX Kal. Maius:

"And so did Aeneas, and addressed Jove:
'The enemy's pledged his vine-crop to the Tyrrhenian king:
Jupiter, you shall have the wine from the Latin vines!'
The nobler prayer succeeded: huge Mezentius died,
And struck the ground, heart filled with indignation.
Autumn came, dyed with the trodden grapes:
The wine, justly owed to Jupiter, was paid."

There were several other Roman festivals associated with the
cultivation of the vine and the production of wine. The Liberalia
(a.d. XVI Kal. Apr.) honored Liber Pater and his consort Libera,
Italian deities associated with fertility of the fields and the
cultivation of the vine, though not necessarily with the production of
wine. The Vinalia Priora (a.d. IX Kal. Maius), also known at the
Vinalia Urbana, celebrated the production of wine by opening casks
from the previous year and pouring a libation (calpar) to Iuppiter.
The Vinalia Rustica (a.d. XIV Kal. Sept.), also known as the Vinalia
Altera, celebrated the start of the grape harvest, in which the first
grapes were broken off the vine by the flamen dialis.

Valete bene and IO MEDITRINALIA!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy, Ovid, Wikipedia, and (www.ancientworlds.net)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46223 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Senatus Populusque Romanus
Cato Galerio Paulino sal.

Salve Pauline.

The difference, of course, being that in ancient Rome during the
meetings of the Senate, the doors of the Senate House were open so
that the People could crowd around and listen to the debate; the
senators had to walk to and from the Senate House in the midst of the
people; the People were a very real vocal and physical reminder to
that august body of exactly from whom they received their power and to
whom they were answerable. Polybius makes this crystal clear, and we
read countless stories in Livy, Polybius, Pausanius &c. of times when
the People made it clear to the Senate that they expected their will
to be obeyed. Are we more Roman than that?

When there is no reminder of such - when the will of the People can be
overturned or ignored simply by the click of a few buttons from a
faraway place - the temptation to view oneself as impervious to the
will of the People can become very strong, as has been evidenced by
both the words and actions of a few in this debate.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46224 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: De Principe Senatus
Salve Luci Iuni,

Lucius Iunius <iunius_verbosus@...> writes:

> Iunius Marino Censor sal.
>
> Even if it was not an office, I'd been under the impression that the
> position carried with it certain prerogatives during the time of the
> late Republic. Was I mistaken?

No, not at all. It was a great honor.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46225 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Senatus Populusque Romanus
Salve Cato

"When there is no reminder of such - when the will of the People can
be overturned or ignored simply by the click of a few buttons from a
faraway place - the temptation to view oneself as impervious to the
will of the People can become very strong, as has been evidenced by
both the words and actions of a few in this debate."

Maybe but

I am a Plebeian candidate for Consul. I know where I cam from. I am
a former Tribune of the Plebs. When the people are right I will be
with them and will defend their prerogatives. But if or when
the "mob" is wrong I will defend the prerogatives of the Senate and
of the State.

This debate started when the Consuls misspoke on what they wanted the
Senate to do. That mistake was published by the Tribunes who you will
note were watching. If three of the five Tribunes had believed the
Senate call was illegal they would have acted. A vigilant citizen has
brought the issue to the forum and we have seen a lively debate.

As we all know the Senate will discuss the issue and the Consuls
place a final, improved amendment before the people for adoption .If
approved the Senate will then be asked to a
ratify them.

Under the current constitution the Senate has a role to play in the
adoption of constitutional amendments. If someone proposes to remove
this power from the Senate that is their prerogative. I would bet
that the Senate would not agree as not only is it the Senate of Nova
Roma but serves as the Board of Directors of Nova Roma, Inc.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Praetor et Senator



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gequitiuscato" <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
>
> Cato Galerio Paulino sal.
>
> Salve Pauline.
>
> The difference, of course, being that in ancient Rome during the
> meetings of the Senate, the doors of the Senate House were open so
> that the People could crowd around and listen to the debate; the
> senators had to walk to and from the Senate House in the midst of
the
> people; the People were a very real vocal and physical reminder to
> that august body of exactly from whom they received their power and
to
> whom they were answerable. Polybius makes this crystal clear, and
we
> read countless stories in Livy, Polybius, Pausanius &c. of times
when
> the People made it clear to the Senate that they expected their will
> to be obeyed. Are we more Roman than that?
>
> When there is no reminder of such - when the will of the People can
be
> overturned or ignored simply by the click of a few buttons from a
> faraway place - the temptation to view oneself as impervious to the
> will of the People can become very strong, as has been evidenced by
> both the words and actions of a few in this debate.
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46226 From: drumax.tribal Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Happy Day!!
Salvete!!

Just thought I would make a quick post to say that yesterday was a
great day. I recieved word that I passed my test and was granted
citizenship to Nova Roma....then when I got home there were NovaRoman
Nummus in my mailbox to add to my coin collection:

http://www.tribalsoup.com/cache/novaroma.jpg

So yesterday was a good day.

Appius Claudius Drusus
Citizen of Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46227 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
Valetudo quod Fortuna,

On 10/11/06, drumax.tribal wrote:
>
> Salvete!!
>
> Just thought I would make a quick post to say that yesterday
> was a great day. I recieved word that I passed my test and was
> granted citizenship to Nova Roma....then when I got home there
> were NovaRoman Nummus in my mailbox to add to my coin
> collection:
>
> [snip URL]
>
> So yesterday was a good day.
>
> Appius Claudius Drusus
> Citizen of Nova Roma
>

Welcome to the ranks of the citizenry!

Nova Roma is a worth-my-while organization (except... [excise rant]
;-) in which I have spent the better part of 8 1/4 years thus far.

I have cordial friendships with a wide-range of folks I never would
have encountered had I not stayed around.

Nova Roma has provided me a place to give Honor to my maternal
ancestry, to share information on Food_n_Drink, to learn more history
and witness the attempt of Moderns to emulate the best of the
Ancients.

There are some shortfalls, but any human endeavour has such.

Look for opportunities to help the building process.

Congratulations, and YES, the coins turned out quite nicely.

=========================================
In Amicus sub Fidelis -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Diribitoror, Lictor, Civis et Paterfamilias

Hostes alienigeni me abducerunt; qui annus est?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46228 From: P.Memmius Albucius Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
P. Memmius Albucius Claudio s.d.

S.V.G.E.R.

Welcome among us, Druse!

Thanks for joining our res publica, and congratulations for your
admission !


Publius Memmius Albucius
Legatus Lugdunensis Galliae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46229 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
Cato Ap. Claudio Druso sal.

Salve Claudius Drusus!

And welcome to the Republic.

As one of those who helped steer the creation of the new coin, I'm
glad you like them :-)

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46230 From: Steven Massa Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Candidacy
Salvete omnes
I, Titus Numerius Ahenobarbus, would like to put my name forward as a candidate for the office of quaestor. I have been a citizen for almost a year (since Nov. 2005), am assidui, and a resident of Mediatlantica province. I have been interested for awhile in getting more involved, and thought that this might be a good way to do it. I am also currently the Legatus for the Philadelphia area of PA in Mediatlantica. Thank you for your consideration.

Vale
Titus Numerius Ahenobarbus





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46231 From: Flavius Vedius Germanicus Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
Salve,

I just got a batch of the new coins the other day, and I must say they
look great. Kudos to all involved.

I would really like to see the issuance of such coins become an annual
tradition. I know the first set of coins sold out relatively quickly and
are now regarding as something of a collector's item. Anyone have any
data on how the new coins are selling?

And I add my voice of welcome, Claudius Drusus. I hope your experience
here will be everything you wish, and more.

Vale,

Flavius Vedius Germanicus
Pater Patriae
Consular
Senator

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Flavius_Vedius_Germanicus_(Election_MMDCCLIX)




gequitiuscato wrote:

>Cato Ap. Claudio Druso sal.
>
>Salve Claudius Drusus!
>
>And welcome to the Republic.
>
>As one of those who helped steer the creation of the new coin, I'm
>glad you like them :-)
>
>Vale bene,
>
>Cato
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46232 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
We started selling the coins on May 7, 2006. As of today, we have sold 1866 circulation coins and 81 proof coins, leaving 3124 circ. and 169 proofs. This number includes the coins returned to the investors in the project. Usually their return was quite a bit smaller than their asked-for return. I thank them again for their generosity.

On another note, I am distributing the coins as a result of my involvement in the initial planning group as well as an appointment as scriba to one of this year's curule aediles, Equitius Cato. I would like to continue in this role under next year's curule aediles, whoever they may be. I think this is the best solution as I already have the store built and have physical possession of the coins. It is cheaper and simpler for me to continue this role than to ship them to someone else.

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa

Flavius Vedius Germanicus <germanicus@...> wrote:
Salve,

I just got a batch of the new coins the other day, and I must say they
look great. Kudos to all involved.

I would really like to see the issuance of such coins become an annual
tradition. I know the first set of coins sold out relatively quickly and
are now regarding as something of a collector's item. Anyone have any
data on how the new coins are selling?

And I add my voice of welcome, Claudius Drusus. I hope your experience
here will be everything you wish, and more.

Vale,

Flavius Vedius Germanicus
Pater Patriae
Consular
Senator

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Flavius_Vedius_Germanicus_(Election_MMDCCLIX)

gequitiuscato wrote:

>Cato Ap. Claudio Druso sal.
>
>Salve Claudius Drusus!
>
>And welcome to the Republic.
>
>As one of those who helped steer the creation of the new coin, I'm
>glad you like them :-)
>
>Vale bene,
>
>Cato
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46233 From: drumax Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
I do like the coins and I hope that if there are any more produced that I might help in the design and production. I have quite a bit of knowledge concerning coins (ancient Roman and World) and I am a designer by trade who has ALWAYS wanted to design a coin in the Roman way. I hope that I might be of service in designing a possible denarius or the next sestersius if Nova Roma ever wanted to do this.

I am an art director at a marketing firm and have access to all design programs, pro-grade printers and plotters, 3D software such as Lightwave, and I design and maintain many websites including my own so if I can be of help to this group in any way feel free to contact me drumax@...

Thanks again.

On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:38:24 -0000, gequitiuscato wrote
> Cato Ap. Claudio Druso sal.
>
> Salve Claudius Drusus!
>
> And welcome to the Republic.
>
> As one of those who helped steer the creation of the new coin, I'm
> glad you like them :-)
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Cato
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46234 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
Cato Vedio Germanico sal.

Salve Vedius Germanicus!

One of the more intelligent ideas to come out of the latest minting
was the creation of a re-useable reverse; the thought being that a
number (I think it was 3 or 4) of runs of sestertii could be minted
with the Temple of the Capitoline Triad on the reverse, with the
obverse changing, and this lowers the cost of any coin using the
existing reverse substantially. Both the existing reverse and obverse
dies are the property of the Republic.

The obverse could be either subsidized by a gens, a province, a
sodalitas - really, any entity within the Republic that is officially
recognized by the Senate - and they would use the existing reverse;
they would be able to design their own obverse and submit that design
to the Senate for approval. So, for example, the gens Apollonia could
design an obverse celebrating Apollo and ask the Senate's permission
to use the existing reverse to mint a new sestertius. The only
standard we created for the obverse was the inclusion of the name of
the names of the consuls of the year in which a coin is approved.

This, and G. Vipsanius Agrippa's post, bring up a question that
Apollonius Cordus and Lucretius Agricola and I bounced around a bit:
the creation of the office of the tresviri monetales; or officers of
the Mint. They would serve under the approval of the Senate, to do
exactly what Vipsanius Agrippa is doing now - overseeing the
distribution of any coins minted by the Republic.

Something to consider.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46235 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
Cato Claudio Druso sal.

Salve Claudius Drusus.

Here's the link to the Nova Roma Coins group:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nrcoins

You are welcome to join it, as is any citizen interested in this
ongoing project!

Vale bene,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "drumax" <drumax@...> wrote:
>
> I do like the coins and I hope that if there are any more produced
that I might help in the design and production. I have quite a bit of
knowledge concerning coins (ancient Roman and World) and I am a
designer by trade who has ALWAYS wanted to design a coin in the Roman
way. I hope that I might be of service in designing a possible
denarius or the next sestersius if Nova Roma ever wanted to do this.
>
> I am an art director at a marketing firm and have access to all
design programs, pro-grade printers and plotters, 3D software such as
Lightwave, and I design and maintain many websites including my own so
if I can be of help to this group in any way feel free to contact
me drumax@...
>
> Thanks again.
>
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:38:24 -0000, gequitiuscato wrote
> > Cato Ap. Claudio Druso sal.
> >
> > Salve Claudius Drusus!
> >
> > And welcome to the Republic.
> >
> > As one of those who helped steer the creation of the new coin, I'm
> > glad you like them :-)
> >
> > Vale bene,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46236 From: m.vipsanius Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Anyone enjoyed Meditrinalia?
Hope I am right but today is the day...Oct 11...shame it's not on a
Friday. It would be much easyer to enjoy more of the new wine.
Semper Fi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46237 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Poll for NR Citizens in America Austrorientalis
I HAVE CREATED A POLL ON THE AMERICA AUSTRORIENTALIS WEBLIST AT
YAHOOGROUPS.COM TO DETERMINE THE PROVINCIAL EMBLEM WHICH WILL BE USED
ON THE PROVINCIAL FLAG (VEXILLIUM), WEBLIST, WEBPAGES, AND OTHER
DISPLAYS. YOU MAY VOTE FOR ONE OF THE CHOICES LISTED OR WRITE IN A
SUGGESTION ON THE PROVINCIAL LIST AS A POST. THE POLL WILL RUN THROUGH
SUNDAY. WHEN IT IS COMPLETED, I WILL HAVE TRIARIUS, VIOLENTILLA, & ANY
OTHERS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN ASSISTING, CREATE A DESIGN WITH COLOR
CHOICES. I WOULD PREFER TO KEEP THE COLOR CHOICES LIMITED TO RED, BLUE,
BLACK, WHITE (FOR SILVER), YELLOW (FOR GOLD), GREEN, AND PURPLE.

IF YOU ARE A CITIZEN WHO RESIDES IN AUSTRORIENTALIS AND ARE NOT YET
SUBSCRIBED TO THE PROVINCIAL LIST, I STRONGLY URGE YOU TO SUBSCRIBE SO
YOU CAN PARTICIPATE IN THIS POLL.

THE POLL WILL RUN THROUGH 11:59 P.M., SUNDAY, OCTOBER 15.

F. GALERIUS AURELIANUS,
PROPRAETOR AAE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46238 From: drumax Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
Thanks for the link, I will sign-up. My only gripe about the coin comes from the difficulty of taking a very fine macro shot of the coin because it is so REFLECTIVE! I believe, like the ancient sestersius, they are brass. That would be accurate historically (and cheapest)  but might I suggest antique brass? it is far less reflective and has a darker richer color and the subject matter doesn't have to compete as much with the brilliance of the metal and it would give the coin a more substantial toned look instead. That would effect the price of minting of course but I found it didn't effect it much per coin in large minting and the coin looks so much better. 

To let you know what I do with my coins, I catalog and clean ancient coins as well as collect and catalog world coins, it takes me a bit of time for each (wife helps) because for each coin I do a write up about about the person, country, time period, or the coin itself. Whatever is most interesting about the coin. I try to treat it like a brief paper for class where I do the research and write it in my own words but in the end I will borrow which is why I link to all sources I might use on the main index page as well as the specific coin page. My site is here:

http://www.tribalsoup.com/cache/index.htm

that URL will change very soon to CacheCoins. I do not sell anything on my site, it is only for reference, education, enjoyment and information for collectors looking to ID a coin I might have. My favorite parts are, of course, my ancients and the Conder Tokens under World Coins.

http://www.tribalsoup.com/cache/howardconder.htm

That is a link that shows, roughly what I do for each coin I have simply piles more to catalog and write-up as I buy ancients in bulk and clean them myself (I might easily have a hundred Constantine's and his wayward sons). I was recently approached by some teachers who suggested the idea that I farm out the write-up job to the children they work with which is exciting for me and it is why I need to get a permanent fitting URL. If there are no objections I will put up a page for Nova Roma coins on my site.

I would love to get my hands on the original NR coin but alas it seems that will be a bit more difficult.

I will follow any related topics and maybe begin work on a design to submit. To be honest, because minting coins when minting well over a thousand of them is rather cheap, I have been toying with the idea of printing my own coins with family members portraits as  as homage to my ancestors like this lovely piece of the family Decimia with Roma on the obverse or the coins pictured in the link below it.

http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/rsc/decimia/decimia1.jpg

http://www.forumancientcoins.com/Coins/80176q00.jpg

I feel the key is to not only follow the design and themes of the times but also the style of subject and look of inscription and it should be toned. I have seriously considered trying to mint coins the Roman way with die and hammer but the cost and work involved is a bit more prohibiting so I settled that when I DO mint coins I will mint them as modern homage's in style and subject to the Roman way, ancient themes on modern coins. For this I would look to the very first modern Israeli coins that do just that (one last link but its a wonderful coin):

 http://www.tribalsoup.com/cache/israel01.htm

http://www.tribalsoup.com/cache/israel02.htm

Sorry, I get on coins and then I ramble.

Thanks again!




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46239 From: Rick Sciarappa Date: 2006-10-11
Subject: Re: Anyone enjoyed Meditrinalia?
Salve,

Yes, Meditrinalia was today...
I poured a libation of wine to Jupiter on behalf of my family,
then my wife and I enjoyed some wine.
As I write this now, the soft sound of thunder can be heard
in my area of Connecticut. Hope, Jupiter liked his merlot.

Lucius Cassius Cornutus




On Oct 11, 2006, at 8:15 PM, m.vipsanius wrote:

> Hope I am right but today is the day...Oct 11...shame it's not on a
> Friday. It would be much easyer to enjoy more of the new wine.
> Semper Fi
>
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46240 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "drumax" <drumax@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the link, I will sign-up. My only gripe about the coin
comes from the difficulty of taking a very fine macro shot of the coin
because it is so REFLECTIVE! I believe, like the ancient sestersius,
they are brass. That would be accurate historically (and cheapest)
but might I suggest antique brass? it is far less reflective and has a
darker richer color and the subject matter doesn't have to compete as
much with the brilliance of the metal and it would give the coin a
more substantial toned look instead. That would effect the price of
minting of course but I found it didn't effect it much per coin in
large minting and the coin looks so much better.
>

Salve!

Carry one in your pocket for a while and you will be rewarded with a
rich patina with nice warm highlights. Antiquing at the mint makes a
pretty coin, but it interferes with the natural mellowing.

Since the exchange rate is set so low (50 US cents each), even adding
a penny or two to the cost of each is pretty much out of the question.

optime vale

M. Lucretius Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46241 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Election info
M. Lucretius Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.

This is a reminder that election information is available at
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Election_MMDCCLIX_(Nova_Roma)

If the link is broken, just go to the main page
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Main_Page and enter "election" in the
search box. "Election MMDCCLIX (Nova Roma)" should be the first choice
that comes up.


All candidates should be aware that (since they are all citizens) they
can have an editing account. This means you can upload your own
pictures and enter or edit your own campaign statement. If any
candidate needs help with this, there are several people (the wiki
magisters) who can help you. They are listed on
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/NovaRoma:WikiMagisters

All should note that we have good security against vandalism since
only citizens may edit and a record is kept of every edit to every
article.

I hope all the candiates and all citizens will make full use of these
pages.

Optime valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46242 From: m.vipsanius Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Anyone enjoyed Meditrinalia?
Salve Cornutus and all readers...

My Meditrinalia involved the mix of a 2005 Tarrango(victoria
australia...a bit out of the ancient reach) and a 2005 late year only
just released Beaujolais Nouveau(Gaul in origin)....the ceremony
seemed to produced the desired blessing for a (Tiger fan in Upstate
New York watched his team beat the A's)....great feeling to reproduce
the sensation of a 1000 years ago.

Semper Fi

Marcus Vipsanius Pollio


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Rick Sciarappa <obiwan6797@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> Yes, Meditrinalia was today...
> I poured a libation of wine to Jupiter on behalf of my family,
> then my wife and I enjoyed some wine.
> As I write this now, the soft sound of thunder can be heard
> in my area of Connecticut. Hope, Jupiter liked his merlot.
>
> Lucius Cassius Cornutus
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 11, 2006, at 8:15 PM, m.vipsanius wrote:
>
> > Hope I am right but today is the day...Oct 11...shame it's not on
a
> > Friday. It would be much easyer to enjoy more of the new wine.
> > Semper Fi
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46243 From: drumax Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Happy Day!!
Understood, I carry one with me now and probably will from now on, I figured with more handling its brilliance would fade.

On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 04:17:05 -0000, M. Lucretius Agricola wrote
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "drumax" <drumax@...> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the link, I will sign-up. My only gripe about the coin
> comes from the difficulty of taking a very fine macro shot of the coin
> because it is so REFLECTIVE! I believe, like the ancient sestersius,
> they are brass. That would be accurate historically (and cheapest)
> but might I suggest antique brass? it is far less reflective and has a
> darker richer color and the subject matter doesn't have to compete as
> much with the brilliance of the metal and it would give the coin a
> more substantial toned look instead. That would effect the price of
> minting of course but I found it didn't effect it much per coin in
> large minting and the coin looks so much better.
> >
>
> Salve!
>
> Carry one in your pocket for a while and you will be rewarded with a
> rich patina with nice warm highlights. Antiquing at the mint makes a
> pretty coin, but it interferes with the natural mellowing.
>
> Since the exchange rate is set so low (50 US cents each), even adding
> a penny or two to the cost of each is pretty much out of the question.
>
> optime vale
>
> M. Lucretius Agricola
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46244 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: New file uploaded to Nova-Roma
Salve Romans

Please disregard this notice as the file did not work.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
----- Original Message -----
From: Yahoo! Groups Notification<mailto:notify@yahoogroups.com>
To: Nova-Roma-owner@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma-owner@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 1:51 AM
Subject: New file uploaded to Nova-Roma



Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of your Nova-Roma
group.

File : /nr forum poster.wps
Uploaded by : tiberiusgaleriuspaulinus <spqr753@...<mailto:spqr753@...>>
Description :

You can access the file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/files/nr%20forum%20poster.wps<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/files/nr%20forum%20poster.wps>

Your group is currently configured to send you email
notification whenever a member uploads a file. To turn off
notification, visit:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/join<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/join>

Thank you for choosing Yahoo! Groups as your email group
service for the Nova-Roma group.

Regards,

Yahoo! Groups Customer Care

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>








[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46245 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Apology for absence
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

This is just a quick note to say sorry that I haven't been replying to anything this week. I've been unexpectedly busy, but I shall catch up over the weekend.





___________________________________________________________
All New Yahoo! Mail – Tired of Vi@gr@! come-ons? Let our SpamGuard protect you. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46246 From: gequitiuscato Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Oct.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem IV Idus Octobris; haec dies comitialis est.

"But these rejoicings were very nearly being embittered by a great
disaster in Samnium. The consul Cornelius had advanced from Saticula
and led his army by a mountain pass which descended into a narrow
valley. All the surrounding heights were occupied by the enemy, and he
did not notice them high up above him till retreat was impossible. The
Samnites were waiting quietly till the whole of the column should
descend into the lowest part of the valley, but meantime P. Decius, a
military tribune, descried a peak jutting out on the pass which
commanded the enemy's camp. This height would have been a difficult
one for a heavy-armed force to climb but not for one in light marching
order. Decius came up to the consul, who was in a great state of
alarm, and said to him: "Do you see, A. Cornelius, that height above
the enemy? If we promptly seize that position which the Samnites were
blind enough to leave unoccupied, it will prove a stronghold in which
all our hopes of safety will center. Do not give me more than the
hastati and principes of one legion. When I have reached the summit
with them you may march on out of this and save yourself and the army,
for the enemy below, a mark for every missile we hurl, will not be
able to move without being destroyed. Either the Fortune of Rome or
our own courage will then clear the way for our escape." The consul
warmly thanked him, and after being furnished with the detachment he
asked for, he marched through the pass unobserved and only came into
view of the enemy when he was close to the spot for which he was
making. Then whilst every eye was fixed upon him in silent
astonishment, he gave the consul time to withdraw his army into a more
favourable position until he had halted his own men on the summit. The
Samnites marched aimlessly hither and thither; they could not follow
the consul except by the same path where he had been exposed to their
weapons and which was now equally dangerous to them, nor could they
lead a force up the hill above them which Decius had seized.

He and his men had snatched victory from their grasp, and therefore it
was against him that their rage was mainly directed, whilst the
nearness of the position and the paucity of its defenders were
additional incentives to them to attack it. First they were bent upon
investing the peaks on all sides so as to cut Decius off from the
consul, then they thought of retiring and leaving the way open for him
so that they could attack when he had descended into the valley.
Whilst they were still in this state of indecision night overtook
them. At first Decius hoped to be able to attack them from his higher
ground while they were coming up the height; then he began to wonder
why they did not show fight, or, at all events, if they were deterred
by the nature of the ground why they did not enclose him with a
circumvallation. He called the centurions round him. "What ignorance,
what cowardice this is!" he exclaimed. "How on earth did those men win
a victory over the Sidicines and Campanians? You see them there
marching up and down, at one time forming up in close order, at
another extending. We could by this time have been completely invested
yet no one begins to entrench. We shall be like them if we stay here
longer than we need. Come along with me and let us reconnoitre their
positions while some light is still left and find out where the exit
from here is open.'' Disguised in a common soldier's cloak that the
enemy might not mark the general going his rounds, and with his
centurions similarly attired, he made a thorough examination of all
these details." - Livy, History of Rome 7.34

Today is the second day of the Meditrinalia.


Today is also the celebration of Columbus Day. On August 2, A.D.
1492, Christopher Columbus set sail in search of the East Indies. The
voyage was financed by King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain by
making the city of Palos pay back a debt to the crown by providing two
of the ships, and by getting Italian financial backing for part of the
expenses. Columbus first asked Queen Isabella for help in 1486, but it
was years before she agreed...provided that he conquer some of the
islands and mainland for Spain. Columbus would also be given the title
of "Admiral of All the Ocean Seas," and receive one-tenth of the
riches that came from any of his discoveries. The crown had to put up
very little money from the treasury. Columbus and 90 crewmen boarded
the three ships that were to make the first voyage to the New World,
the Niña, Pinta, and the flagship, Santa Maria. On October 12, 1492,
Columbus first saw the islands of the new world, landing in the
Bahamas. Later in the month, he would sail to Cuba, and to Hispaniola
(now Haiti). He thought he had reached the East Indies, the islands
off Southeast Asia.

Contrary to popular belief, most educated individuals in the 15th
century, and especially sailors, already knew that the earth was
round. What was not realized by Columbus, however, was just how big a
globe it was. Columbus seriously underestimated the size of the
planet. Christopher Columbus and his crew had expected to see people
native to India, or be taken to see the great leader Khan. They called
the first people they saw "Indians." They had gone ashore in their
best clothes, knelt and praised God for arriving safely. From the
"Indians" they learned that the island was called Guanahani. Columbus
christened it San Salvador and claimed it immediately for Spain. When
they landed on the island that is now Cuba, they thought they were in
Japan. After three subsequent voyages, Columbus was still
unenlightened. He died a famous man, but he never knew that
he discovered lands that few people had imagined were there.

Columbus had stopped at what are now the Caribbean Islands, either
Watling Island, Grand Turk Island, or Samana Cay. In 1926, Watling
Island was renamed San Salvador and acknowledged as the first land in
the New World. Recently, however, some people have begun to dispute
the claim. A group from Miami, Florida have started a movement to
recognize Conception Island as the one that Columbus and his men first
sighted and landed on. The controversy has not yet been resolved.

As a reward for his valuable discovery, the Spanish crown granted
Columbus the right to bear arms. His new Coat of Arms added the royal
charges of Castile and Leon and an image of islands to his traditional
family arms. Columbus further modified the design to include a
continent beside the pictured islands.

In A.D. 1493, Pope Alexander VI issued the Papal Bull Inter caetera
that proclaimed that all Christian Europeans had ultimate dominion
over newly discovered lands.

The first recorded celebration of Columbus Day in the U.S. was held by
the Tammany Society, also known as the the Colombian Order, in New
York on October 12th A.D. 1792, marking the 300th anniversary of
Christopher Columbus's landing in the Bahamas. Columbus Day was first
celebrated by Italians in San Francisco in 1869, following on the
heels of 1866 Italian celebrations in New York City. The first state
celebration was in Colorado in 1905, and in 1937, President Franklin
Delano Roosevelt set aside Columbus Day as holiday in the United
States. Since 1971, the holiday has been commemorated in the U.S. on
the second Monday in October, the same day as Thanksgiving in
neighbouring Canada. The date of Columbus's arrival in the Americas
is celebrated in Mexico (and in some Latino communities in the U.S. as
the Dia de la Raza ("day of the race"), commemorating the first
encounters of Europe and the Americas which would produce the new
Mestizo race.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Livy, Wikipedia, (www.usemb.se/Holidays/celebrate/Columbus.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46247 From: Timothy P. Gallagher Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul : A few ide
Salve Romans

A few days ago I outlined some ideas I have that I would like to do
if elected Consul. I would like to bring to your attention a few
additional ideas. I would like some feed back.

One of the things Nova Roma needs is publicity.
We need to be proactive in terms of public relations
but it costs money.

I would like to ask/impose (whichever gets us the most money) a
surcharge of $5.00 US dollars on every current and future citizen
for the establishment of a public relations fund.

I have already created three different posters that we could print
and then sent to citizens around the world for placement at Pagan
festivals, schools, colleges, reenacting events,(anywhere we can)as
well as run them as ads in newspapers and magazines. We should also
look into scholarly journals and see if any of them except
advertising.

(Translations of these or other designs will be created)

Currently we have 964 citizens or pending citizens that would yield
a sum of $4820.00USD, if every one contributed. While this is not
a large amount it would be a dedicated fund used solely for
advertising. I know that our Pater Patriae Marcus Cassius Iulianus
owns a printing/copy company and should be able to provide us with
sound information on what we can get for this amount of money.

The posters could be placed online and provincial Governors
could download them for printing locally, eliminating the need to
spend money on postage.

Having served as Consular Quaestor i.e. the tax collector, I am
acutely aware of how many of our citizens do not pay taxes.
Hopefully even those who do not pay taxes MIGHT be willing
to donate this amount.

As part of our PR plan each April 21st ( or close to it) the
provinces of Nova Roma will donate five books on Rome to a local
library. Our library labels are already designed and can be
downloaded now for use. When we do this we make sure that local
media are informed and we get as much coverage in the papers as
possible.

An additional idea is to charge a nominal fee to process the
application for citizenship.

The fee would be large enough to make it worth the donation but not
to large to discourage serious applications. Very few membership
groups and no governments I know of give away, for free, these
types of services. In the USA it costs almost $100.00 for a passport
and $255.00 to apply for citizenship . The amounts we are discussing
are minuscule in comparison.

We can also issue citizenship scrolls ( like the ones used as
wedding invitations.) This would serve as both a commemoration of
citizenship and the fees charged would enrich the treasury.

I would also like to undertake as a stand alone project a survey of
citizen occupations and avocations . Each of us knows what a few of
us do for a living but we do not know what the vast majority of our
citizens do. If we had this type of information we might be able
to tap into some newly discovered expertise that might prove
invaluable to Nova Roma. If we find out what our citizens like to
do we may be able to get them to do that for Nova Roma.

We might discover that citizen Xus is a film student or works for
a TV production company and who would be willing to help film a
video on Nova Roma for use as a recruitment tool. Or we might find
that citizen USx is a banker or investment advisor.

Do we have any citizens who works for a publishing house or who
writes grant applications as a profession ? The possibilities are
endless because we do not know. The information would of course have
to be provided willing by our citizens. A section could be added to
the census to keep track of this information. The information like
all others of its kind would be available for use by magistrates in
line with their duties.

I know that in the USA it is possible to use the free access
channels of the local cable companies for promoting local groups. It
might even be possible to have a local TV show. How much access can
we get, for free, in the other counties in which we have citizens?
Can we get air time on Italian or French TV? What are the
possibilities in eastern Europe, Australia or in South America?

And lastly How about a cookbook from our own Sodalitas Coquorum et
Cerevisiae Coctorum they write it, we publish it and sell it, and
the treasury gets bigger.

So what do you think?

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Candidate for Consul
Mea gloria fideles
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46248 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: New file uploaded to Nova-Roma
> Salve Romans
>
> Please disregard this notice as the file did not work.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

For files that you want to make available permanently, please upload
to the Wiki instead - we have more control over that site than we
do at Yahoo.

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com

"What is the difference? What indeed is the point? ...The
clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It's
over there, in a box." -- J. Cleese
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46249 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul : A few
Salve amice,

Thank you for your ideas here. I have some thoughts:

1)I am a little pessimistic about imposing a 5 dollar surcharge on
many citizens coming in to NR. It is hard enough to get people to
pay 10 dollars as citizens and I hold preciuos little hope that many
will pay 5 dollars even before becoming a citizen.

2) With our 200 - 300 solid citizens that pay taxes, why not
encourage them to donate a lot more like PBS does? For example if
someone sends 50.00, mail them a few NR coins; 100 dollars perhaps a
t-shirt,coffee mug or book; 500.00 a DVD movie set like Rome The
First Season; 1000.00 a sword or tunic; 10,000 a whole legionaire's
kit amd equipment from the Wren's nest or a trip to one of our
conventions somewhere.

3)Is there any way to set up a credit card system? I as well as
others do not care for paypal as there are glitches and many
fradulent site that can fool people. Can cheques or money orders
sent to us be processed faster than they are?

4) What about a contest of some sort for the SPQR ring? 10.00 to
enter, answer some general knowledge questions etc.

5)We should encourage people to buy the clothing and rings with the
NR logos.This often brings up much interest from the public. Nothing
like a walking advertisement!

6) As mentioned before we need to get more face to face meetings
with one another. This can be done on a smaller local scale. For
example my governor would like to have meetings (even be it for a
casual lunch or dinner) at least every six weeks.
Each time I will try and invite a new person or two to attend and
see what transpires - especially after I pick up his or her tab.
Also encourage people to visit your home for a little get together
or party to give them a taste of what is up. My wife Vibia has done
that with our Mexican Association and we have gained many members
and volunteers as well.

7) Take some videos of the covnentus, Roman Days, or the re-
enactment legions in action. Sell copies to the citizens or give
them directly to our provincial governors so the public can visit
their homes see that we do things; the Europeans would be excellent
at this since they have the Roman ruins and antiquties right at
their feet. These sorts of videos get people all worked up and
enthusiatic just like military recruit commercials.

These are just a few ideas to compliment yours.

Regards,

QSP












--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Timothy P. Gallagher"
<spqr753@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Romans
>
> A few days ago I outlined some ideas I have that I would like to
do
> if elected Consul. I would like to bring to your attention a few
> additional ideas. I would like some feed back.
>
> One of the things Nova Roma needs is publicity.
> We need to be proactive in terms of public relations
> but it costs money.
>
> I would like to ask/impose (whichever gets us the most money) a
> surcharge of $5.00 US dollars on every current and future citizen
> for the establishment of a public relations fund.
>
> I have already created three different posters that we could
print
> and then sent to citizens around the world for placement at Pagan
> festivals, schools, colleges, reenacting events,(anywhere we can)
as
> well as run them as ads in newspapers and magazines. We should
also
> look into scholarly journals and see if any of them except
> advertising.
>
> (Translations of these or other designs will be created)
>
> Currently we have 964 citizens or pending citizens that would
yield
> a sum of $4820.00USD, if every one contributed. While this is
not
> a large amount it would be a dedicated fund used solely for
> advertising. I know that our Pater Patriae Marcus Cassius Iulianus
> owns a printing/copy company and should be able to provide us with
> sound information on what we can get for this amount of money.
>
> The posters could be placed online and provincial Governors
> could download them for printing locally, eliminating the need to
> spend money on postage.
>
> Having served as Consular Quaestor i.e. the tax collector, I am
> acutely aware of how many of our citizens do not pay taxes.
> Hopefully even those who do not pay taxes MIGHT be willing
> to donate this amount.
>
> As part of our PR plan each April 21st ( or close to it) the
> provinces of Nova Roma will donate five books on Rome to a local
> library. Our library labels are already designed and can be
> downloaded now for use. When we do this we make sure that local
> media are informed and we get as much coverage in the papers as
> possible.
>
> An additional idea is to charge a nominal fee to process the
> application for citizenship.
>
> The fee would be large enough to make it worth the donation but
not
> to large to discourage serious applications. Very few membership
> groups and no governments I know of give away, for free, these
> types of services. In the USA it costs almost $100.00 for a
passport
> and $255.00 to apply for citizenship . The amounts we are
discussing
> are minuscule in comparison.
>
> We can also issue citizenship scrolls ( like the ones used as
> wedding invitations.) This would serve as both a commemoration of
> citizenship and the fees charged would enrich the treasury.
>
> I would also like to undertake as a stand alone project a survey
of
> citizen occupations and avocations . Each of us knows what a few
of
> us do for a living but we do not know what the vast majority of
our
> citizens do. If we had this type of information we might be able
> to tap into some newly discovered expertise that might prove
> invaluable to Nova Roma. If we find out what our citizens like to
> do we may be able to get them to do that for Nova Roma.
>
> We might discover that citizen Xus is a film student or works
for
> a TV production company and who would be willing to help film a
> video on Nova Roma for use as a recruitment tool. Or we might find
> that citizen USx is a banker or investment advisor.
>
> Do we have any citizens who works for a publishing house or who
> writes grant applications as a profession ? The possibilities are
> endless because we do not know. The information would of course
have
> to be provided willing by our citizens. A section could be added
to
> the census to keep track of this information. The information
like
> all others of its kind would be available for use by magistrates
in
> line with their duties.
>
> I know that in the USA it is possible to use the free access
> channels of the local cable companies for promoting local groups.
It
> might even be possible to have a local TV show. How much access
can
> we get, for free, in the other counties in which we have citizens?
> Can we get air time on Italian or French TV? What are the
> possibilities in eastern Europe, Australia or in South America?
>
> And lastly How about a cookbook from our own Sodalitas Coquorum et
> Cerevisiae Coctorum they write it, we publish it and sell it,
and
> the treasury gets bigger.
>
> So what do you think?
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Candidate for Consul
> Mea gloria fideles
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46250 From: legio_vi_tribunis Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Off Topic: Roman Historical Society
Salvette Omne,

Marcus Sejanus here, and I just wanted to add that the Roman
Historical Society has been cleaned up and back in service. The RHS is
in no way trying to compete against NR, but rather its my society for
the creation of a living history site here in Nevada. Any member of
NR can join the RHS, and for the most part, the RHS follows NR
guidelines. When the settlement is created, if the Senate wishes to
visit, then the Senators shall be treated as such. This applies to
all magistrates. The sole purpose of the RHS is the creation of the
settlement and since we are a 501C3, its easier to over see the
project from my end. I encourage all to visit our yahoo groups
site:(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Roman_Historical_Society/). Any
and all feed back would be appreciated. In the coming weeks, I shall
begin the announcements as to our future projects.

Marcus Pontius Sejanus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46251 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul : A few ideas
Salve Quinte Seutoni,

> 1)I am a little pessimistic about imposing a 5 dollar surcharge on
> many citizens coming in to NR.

This could be difficult. It should also be scaled by country, as the
basic fee is, as $5 is a large amount in some places.

> 2) With our 200 - 300 solid citizens that pay taxes, why not
> encourage them to donate a lot more like PBS does? For example if
> someone sends 50.00, mail them a few NR coins;

Or perhaps membership certificates or cards? People ask for these
all the time. We could make it a benefit of *paid* membership
(and raise the price of that a dollar or two to compensate).

> 3)Is there any way to set up a credit card system?

The company I work for has two of these that we use for online
sales. They cause a lot of headaches; these companies are not
easy to deal with. I can't say what the cost is, though.

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com

-"Apes don't read philosophy."
-"Yes they do, Otto, they just don't understand it! Let me correct
you on a few things: Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of
Buddhism is not 'every man for himself'. And the London Underground is
not a political movement! Those are all mistakes. I looked them up."
-from "A Fish Called Wanda"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46252 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Provincial Edictum XXVI-Appointment of Praefectus Regio Mississippi
AMERICA AUSTRORIENTALIS EDICTUM XXVI-Appointment of Regio Praefectus
of Mississippi and Louisiana. Edictum propraetoricum 2759 about
Appointment of Praefectus Regio Mississippi and Louisiana.

I, Flavius Galerius Aurelianus, Propraetor America Austrorientalis,
hereby appoint

Gaius Antonius Germanicus as Praefectus Regio Mississippi
(encompassing the states of Mississippi and Louisiana).

This edictum becomes effective immediately.

Given under my hand, this day 12 October 2759 AUC, being 2006 AD
Gregorian, in the Consulship of C. Fabius Buteo Modianus and Po.
Minucia Strabo.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46253 From: drumax Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus for Consul : A few ideas
Use paypal, you can accept credit card on a paypal account for online payments.

On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:33:34 -0500 (CDT), Matt Hucke wrote
> Salve Quinte Seutoni,
>
> > 1)I am a little pessimistic about imposing a 5 dollar surcharge on
> > many citizens coming in to NR.
>
> This could be difficult. It should also be scaled by country, as the
> basic fee is, as $5 is a large amount in some places.
>
> > 2) With our 200 - 300 solid citizens that pay taxes, why not
> > encourage them to donate a lot more like PBS does? For example if
> > someone sends 50.00, mail them a few NR coins;
>
> Or perhaps membership certificates or cards? People ask for these
> all the time. We could make it a benefit of *paid* membership
> (and raise the price of that a dollar or two to compensate).
>
> > 3)Is there any way to set up a credit card system?
>
> The company I work for has two of these that we use for online
> sales. They cause a lot of headaches; these companies are not
> easy to deal with. I can't say what the cost is, though.
>
> Vale, Octavius.
>
> --
> Marcus Octavius Gracchus
> octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com
>
> -"Apes don't read philosophy."
> -"Yes they do, Otto, they just don't understand it! Let me correct
> you on a few things: Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of
> Buddhism is not 'every man for himself'. And the London Underground is
> not a political movement! Those are all mistakes. I looked them up."
> -from "A Fish Called Wanda"
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46254 From: leotarious Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Salve May Fratera's
Hello my brothers and sisters. My name is Marcus Marius
Scipio. I am a Member of the S.C.A. and have recently found out about
you. I was so excited to learn about what it is you are and do.
See I belong to the Kingdom Of Atenvedlt, and my Kingdom considers
Rome to be pre-period. They reenact from the year 500 to the year 1600
and have given me a lot of static for being pre period.(Personnelly I
think its because our little troop of Romans usually decimates any and
all who stand against us)So to find brothers and sisters like
yourselves out here in internet land. Is quit comforting. If there is
anyone out there who lives in Arizona and would like to see some
Romans participating in full combat using door shields and Rattan
gladious's write me and Ill give you instructions on how to get to
where we play. To all others. It is an honour to be apart of the New
Rome.
Salutamus ET Romanees
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46255 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Salve May Fratera's
Salve Marce Mari,

M. Marius Scipio <leotarious@...> writes:

> Hello my brothers and sisters. My name is Marcus Marius
> Scipio. I am a Member of the S.C.A. and have recently found out about
> you. I was so excited to learn about what it is you are and do.

Welcome! I hope you will continue to participate here, and perhaps even join
Nova Roma.

> See I belong to the Kingdom Of Atenvedlt,

A place where I have friends. I get out your way infrequently, though I live
in what is to you the Kingdom of Atlantia.

> and my Kingdom considers Rome to be pre-period.

That's curious. I know that at least some parts of the Society allow personae
going back to the dawn of time. But I also recognize that there is
variability between the kingdoms.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46256 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Publicity needs action rather than money
Salve, cousin.

With all due respect, you cannot solve the problem of publicity for Nova
Roma with money. It will require that Nova Romans get out into the pagan,
academic, reenactment, and certain ethnic communities (Italian) to spread the
message in person. We could use citizens skilled in graphic design to produce a
generic brochure that can have a local contact label affixed to hand out at
events. Also, as others have posted, you cannot expect others to give more
money to Nova Roma when all they are getting are intangibles now. I will grant
that learning and knowledge is important but I believe they want some
recognition.
Membership cards is one way to provide recognition but another was is to
give hard working citizens the public thanks of the Senate or a simple award
like a corona civis. Also, the Consuls, Senators, and other central magistrates
need to get off their computers and start leading by example, i.e. going to
events.

Be well.

Galeri Aureliane



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46257 From: drumax Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Publicity needs action rather than money
I am a designer, I also have access to color laser copiers and plotters. I could help with designing and printing of literature...its what I do everyday.

On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:15:47 EDT, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE wrote
> Salve, cousin.
>
> With all due respect, you cannot solve the problem of publicity for Nova
> Roma with money. It will require that Nova Romans get out into the pagan,
> academic, reenactment, and certain ethnic communities (Italian) to spread the
> message in person. We could use citizens skilled in graphic design to produce a
> generic brochure that can have a local contact label affixed to hand out at
> events. Also, as others have posted, you cannot expect others to give more
> money to Nova Roma when all they are getting are intangibles now. I will grant
> that learning and knowledge is important but I believe they want some
> recognition.
> Membership cards is one way to provide recognition but another was is to
> give hard working citizens the public thanks of the Senate or a simple award
> like a corona civis. Also, the Consuls, Senators, and other central magistrates
> need to get off their computers and start leading by example, i.e. going to
> events.
>
> Be well.
>
> Galeri Aureliane
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46258 From: Honesta Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Caelestes Privati
Quam pulchri crucibus suffixi,
atque galeis vestiti,
sunt vestri Caelestes privati.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46259 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Publicity needs action rather than money
F. Galerius Aurelianus Drumax of the Tribe. Salve.

I do not know if the leadership of Nova Roma, present or future, is
interested in taking you up on your offer but the Propraetor of
America Austrorientalis is very willing to do so; namely, me. I
would like to discuss this with you at length but we should probably
wait until after the election. Then we can involve the new Consuls &
a couple of other elected magistrates briefly while they talk your
offer to death. Then we can proceed without them . . . providing
that the new elected magistrates are more than just talk. I hold
some hope for my cousin, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus, but we will have
to see. Thank you, thank you for your very kind offer. We will stay
in touch.

Vale.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "drumax" <drumax@...> wrote:
>
> I am a designer, I also have access to color laser copiers and
plotters. I could help with designing and printing of
literature...its what I do everyday.
>
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:15:47 EDT, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE wrote
> > Salve, cousin.
> >
> > With all due respect, you cannot solve the problem of publicity
for Nova
> > Roma with money. It will require that Nova Romans get out into
the pagan,
> > academic, reenactment, and certain ethnic communities (Italian)
to spread the
> > message in person. We could use citizens skilled in graphic
design to produce a
> > generic brochure that can have a local contact label affixed to
hand out at
> > events. Also, as others have posted, you cannot expect others to
give more
> > money to Nova Roma when all they are getting are intangibles now.
I will grant
> > that learning and knowledge is important but I believe they want
some
> > recognition.
> > Membership cards is one way to provide recognition but another
was is to
> > give hard working citizens the public thanks of the Senate or a
simple award
> > like a corona civis. Also, the Consuls, Senators, and other
central magistrates
> > need to get off their computers and start leading by example,
i.e. going to
> > events.
> >
> > Be well.
> >
> > Galeri Aureliane
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46260 From: Joseph Marzullo Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Off Topic: Roman Historical Society
Salve!

I joined your group, looks interesting. Is it trying to become a Roman society, or is it more of a place of discussion? I had to re-apply here with a new Roman name, so I hope I'm accepted as a citizen soon.

There's a good Roman game at: http://www.romanlegion.com/

legio_vi_tribunis <marcus.sejanus@...> wrote:
Salvette Omne,

Marcus Sejanus here, and I just wanted to add that the Roman
Historical Society has been cleaned up and back in service. The RHS is
in no way trying to compete against NR, but rather its my society for
the creation of a living history site here in Nevada. Any member of
NR can join the RHS, and for the most part, the RHS follows NR
guidelines. When the settlement is created, if the Senate wishes to
visit, then the Senators shall be treated as such. This applies to
all magistrates. The sole purpose of the RHS is the creation of the
settlement and since we are a 501C3, its easier to over see the
project from my end. I encourage all to visit our yahoo groups
site:(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Roman_Historical_Society/). Any
and all feed back would be appreciated. In the coming weeks, I shall
begin the announcements as to our future projects.

Marcus Pontius Sejanus






---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46261 From: Joseph Marzullo Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Publicity needs action rather than money
Salve,

Agreed. While I do live in an Italian area, most people around here are old Italians, I don't think they will care for it if I tried to "sell" this to them, I don't even think the majority have the internet.

I think we should create various banners in .pdf or whatever, add them to this mailing list, then people can download as many as they want and post them all over. There should be some quota of like one a day, money doesn't help with members, you need an effective marketing campaign.

While Italians are the closest moern day people that you could look at as Roman descendents, I have found that most just don't care about Roman culture, they are mostly interested in holidays like Columbus Day rather than the Ides of March for example, so while it would be cool to have a more Italian base, I think the majority of interested people will still be non-italians, so I don't think you should target the Italian ethnic group solely.

PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:
Salve, cousin.

With all due respect, you cannot solve the problem of publicity for Nova
Roma with money. It will require that Nova Romans get out into the pagan,
academic, reenactment, and certain ethnic communities (Italian) to spread the
message in person. We could use citizens skilled in graphic design to produce a
generic brochure that can have a local contact label affixed to hand out at
events. Also, as others have posted, you cannot expect others to give more
money to Nova Roma when all they are getting are intangibles now. I will grant
that learning and knowledge is important but I believe they want some
recognition.
Membership cards is one way to provide recognition but another was is to
give hard working citizens the public thanks of the Senate or a simple award
like a corona civis. Also, the Consuls, Senators, and other central magistrates
need to get off their computers and start leading by example, i.e. going to
events.

Be well.

Galeri Aureliane


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46262 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Publicity needs action AND money
Salve Drumax of the tribe

I have three posters already designed and ready for printing.

When can I pick them up? Why are they not done already?

No seriously Drumax, I do have three posters designed that I think are a good start
for a PR campaign. lets talk off list.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick D. Owen<mailto:Patrick.Owen@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 9:29 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Publicity needs action rather than money


F. Galerius Aurelianus Drumax of the Tribe. Salve.

I do not know if the leadership of Nova Roma, present or future, is
interested in taking you up on your offer but the Propraetor of
America Austrorientalis is very willing to do so; namely, me. I
would like to discuss this with you at length but we should probably
wait until after the election. Then we can involve the new Consuls &
a couple of other elected magistrates briefly while they talk your
offer to death. Then we can proceed without them . . . providing
that the new elected magistrates are more than just talk. I hold
some hope for my cousin, Tiberius Galerius Paulinus, but we will have
to see. Thank you, thank you for your very kind offer. We will stay
in touch.

Vale.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>, "drumax" <drumax@...> wrote:
>
> I am a designer, I also have access to color laser copiers and
plotters. I could help with designing and printing of
literature...its what I do everyday.
>
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:15:47 EDT, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE wrote
> > Salve, cousin.
> >
> > With all due respect, you cannot solve the problem of publicity
for Nova
> > Roma with money. It will require that Nova Romans get out into
the pagan,
> > academic, reenactment, and certain ethnic communities (Italian)
to spread the
> > message in person. We could use citizens skilled in graphic
design to produce a
> > generic brochure that can have a local contact label affixed to
hand out at
> > events. Also, as others have posted, you cannot expect others to
give more
> > money to Nova Roma when all they are getting are intangibles now.
I will grant
> > that learning and knowledge is important but I believe they want
some
> > recognition.
> > Membership cards is one way to provide recognition but another
was is to
> > give hard working citizens the public thanks of the Senate or a
simple award
> > like a corona civis. Also, the Consuls, Senators, and other
central magistrates
> > need to get off their computers and start leading by example,
i.e. going to
> > events.
> >
> > Be well.
> >
> > Galeri Aureliane
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46263 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Off Topic: Roman Historical Society
Joseph,

Nova Roma was founded to reconstruct and restore the Sacra and
Religio Romana but it has evolved into an organization of citizens
with many interests in Roman society, culture, history, and
politics. Some in our organization are attempting to bring Roman
virtues and culture into the real world; while others are primarily
interested in the on-line society. It is up to the individual to
determine what aspects of Nova Roma they wish to participate.
I am a provincial governor, appointed by the NR Senate, to administer
and help expand the province based in the Southeastern USA. I am
also a follower and minor priest of the Sacra and Religio Romana. I
fulfill my positions by teaching classes at pagan festivals, holding
and participating in public rites, and helping to organize public
meetings within my province. To date, I have held or participated in
four public rites (Lupercalia, Cerialia, Vinalia Prioria, and the
Neptunalia) and held/helped hold three public events. I am fortunate
to have many members of my Roman gens (or clan) living close to me to
help advance Nova Roma and my province.
You can learn more by going to the Nova Roma main website, joining
the provincial list in your area, and becoming an active participant
in public functions.
We have many elected magistrates (i.e., officers) who can help you
learn about Nova Roma.

F. Galerius Aurelianus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Joseph Marzullo <crud3w4re@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve!
>
> I joined your group, looks interesting. Is it trying to become a
Roman society, or is it more of a place of discussion? I had to re-
apply here with a new Roman name, so I hope I'm accepted as a citizen
soon.
>
> There's a good Roman game at: http://www.romanlegion.com/
>
> legio_vi_tribunis <marcus.sejanus@...> wrote:
> Salvette Omne,
>
> Marcus Sejanus here, and I just wanted to add that the Roman
> Historical Society has been cleaned up and back in service. The RHS
is
> in no way trying to compete against NR, but rather its my society
for
> the creation of a living history site here in Nevada. Any member of
> NR can join the RHS, and for the most part, the RHS follows NR
> guidelines. When the settlement is created, if the Senate wishes to
> visit, then the Senators shall be treated as such. This applies to
> all magistrates. The sole purpose of the RHS is the creation of the
> settlement and since we are a 501C3, its easier to over see the
> project from my end. I encourage all to visit our yahoo groups
> site:(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Roman_Historical_Society/). Any
> and all feed back would be appreciated. In the coming weeks, I shall
> begin the announcements as to our future projects.
>
> Marcus Pontius Sejanus
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46264 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Re: Publicity needs action rather than money
Hi Joseph,

I know quite a few Italian Canadians who have a lively culture in my
city of Edmonton Alberta and I frequent their parties, social
events, coffee shops and restaurants. Sadly,I have come to the same
conclusion. In many cases, old or young, what they don't know about
sports, home design, culinary things, music, art and all isn't worth
knowing but when it comes to ancient Rome I have found little
interest or enthusiasm. I bring up the subject, they politely listen
for a minute or two then abruptly change the topic - in short, a
lack of interest.

By the way, do you have a Roman name yet?

Regards,

QSP




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Joseph Marzullo <crud3w4re@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> Agreed. While I do live in an Italian area, most people around
here are old Italians, I don't think they will care for it if I
tried to "sell" this to them, I don't even think the majority have
the internet.
>
> I think we should create various banners in .pdf or whatever,
add them to this mailing list, then people can download as many as
they want and post them all over. There should be some quota of like
one a day, money doesn't help with members, you need an effective
marketing campaign.
>
> While Italians are the closest moern day people that you could
look at as Roman descendents, I have found that most just don't care
about Roman culture, they are mostly interested in holidays like
Columbus Day rather than the Ides of March for example, so while it
would be cool to have a more Italian base, I think the majority of
interested people will still be non-italians, so I don't think you
should target the Italian ethnic group solely.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 46265 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2006-10-12
Subject: Book Of Interest (Nero's Killing Machine)
Salvete omnes,

I just ordered this book from Amazon which should be interestin. I
have Caesar's Legion (X) by this author as well:

Review
"Stephen Dando-Collins tracks the history of the 14th
Legion...drawing on 30 years of research for the second of his
definitive histories of ancient Roman armies. A fitting chronicle."
(Military History)

Quote on book:

Book Description
The glorious saga of the most celebrated legion of the early Roman
Empire
In Nero's Killing Machine, the second in the author's definitive
histories of the legions of ancient Rome, Stephen Dando-Collins
brings the 14th Legion to vivid life. Drawing upon thirty-two years
of research, he traces the legion's steps as they were wiped out
while in the army of Julius Caesar, then reformed only to be savaged
again. For decades the men of the 14th would struggle to regain
their lost status, slowly climbing back to glory and eventually
making a legendary stand against Britain's Queen Boudicca, vastly
outnumbered but determined to go down fighting with honor.
Uncovering new information about the legionnaires' lives and Roman
military practices, Nero's Killing Machine is military history at
its finest.

I hope it prooves to be good!

QSP