Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Feb 1-12, 2007

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48868 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48869 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48870 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48871 From: Lucius Cassius Cornutus Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Kalends ritual to Janus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48872 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48873 From: M·C·C· Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: REPORT OF SENATE SESSION
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48874 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48875 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48876 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48877 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48878 From: M·C·C· Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: CORRECTION OF THE REPORT OF SENATE SESSION
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48879 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48880 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48881 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: De Propraetura Californiana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48882 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48883 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48884 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: A Great Site On Roman Britain
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48885 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: A Great Site On Roman Britain
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48886 From: M·C·C· Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: NAMES CORRECTIONS IN THE APPOINTMENT OF INTERPRETES AND GOVERNORS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48887 From: M·C·C· Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: ELECTIONS FOR TRIBUNUS PLEBIS AND AEDILIS PLEBEIUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48888 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48889 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: assistants for plebeian aedile!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48890 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48891 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48892 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48893 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: a.d. IV Non. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48894 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Regalia of Maxentius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48895 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2792
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48896 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48897 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48898 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48899 From: Gaius Aurelius Vindex Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Rif: [Nova-Roma] Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48900 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2792
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48901 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48902 From: Andreas Lachmann Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: roman music
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48903 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: the citizenship test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48904 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: the citizenship test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48905 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48906 From: D. Aemilus Severus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: FW: [Nova-Roma] Re: the citizenship test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48907 From: Inigo Fernandez Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48908 From: D. Aemilus Severus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: FW: [Nova-Roma] Re: the citizenship test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48909 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Rif: [Nova-Roma] Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48910 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48911 From: Appius Iulius Priscus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: roman music
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48912 From: Andreas Lachmann Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: roman music
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48913 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: FW: [Nova-Roma] Re: the citizenship test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48914 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48915 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48916 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48917 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2792
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48918 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48919 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Praetorian Reminder
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48920 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48921 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: a.d. III Non. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48922 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48923 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48924 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48925 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: the citizenship test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48926 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: De censorum edicto
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48927 From: D. Aemilus Severus Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: the citizenship test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48928 From: Michael Sullivan Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2792
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48929 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE VIII-MMDCCLX A.U.C
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48930 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE VIII-MMDCCLX A.U.C
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48931 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE VIII-MMDCCLX A.U.C
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48932 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE VIII-MMDCCLX A.U.C
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48933 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE IX-MMDCCLX A.U.C
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48934 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE X-MMDCCLX A.U.C
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48935 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Checks etc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48936 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-04
Subject: Telethon to save the Palatine
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48937 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-04
Subject: prid. Non. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48938 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-02-04
Subject: Fw: [Explorator] explorator 9.41
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48939 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2007-02-04
Subject: Re: the citizenship test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48940 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: De Aucupibus Senatui
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48941 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48942 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48943 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48944 From: FAC Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Re: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48945 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Non. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48946 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48947 From: Samantha Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Getting home access
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48948 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48949 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48950 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Re: the citizenship test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48951 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48952 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui<
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48953 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48954 From: marcasemproniaiustina Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Rogator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48955 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48956 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2792
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48957 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Re: Rogator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48958 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Market Day Chat on IRC, 2/7/2007, 12:00 am
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48959 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: post. Non. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48960 From: l_fidelius_graecus Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Re: De censorum edicto
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48961 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui<
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48962 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Attention Custodes and Diribitores
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48963 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Re: Attention Custodes and Diribitores
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48964 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Calendarius Nundinalis V
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48965 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-07
Subject: a.d. VII Id. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48966 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-02-07
Subject: MMP Collegium for 2760 a.U.c
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48967 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2007-02-07
Subject: Constitutional Duties of the Tribunis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48968 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2007-02-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORUM DE NOTA IN LUCIUM MARIUM FIMBRIAM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48969 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Re: De censorum edicto
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48970 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORUM DE NOTA IN LUCIUM MARIUM FIMBRIAM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48971 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: a.d. VI Id. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48972 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Slavery in Roman Society
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48973 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Re: De censorum edicto
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48974 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Re: Slavery in Roman Society
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48975 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Re: Slavery in Roman Society
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48976 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Re: De censorum edicto
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48977 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Re: De censorum edicto
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48978 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Non sequitur, Marca Hortensia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48979 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: To Marca Hortensia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48980 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Re: To Marca Hortensia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48981 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Ways of Being Roman
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48982 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: De censorum edicto
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48983 From: M·C·C· Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48984 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: Ways of Being Roman
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48985 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: a.d. V Id. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48986 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Looters halted in Spain
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48987 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: Ways of Being Roman--Nope, definitely not campaigning.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48988 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: To Marca Hortensia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48989 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Apologies
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48990 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: To Marca Hortensia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48991 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Campaigning vs. Not Campaigning for Tribune of the Plebs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48992 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: Looters halted in Spain
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48993 From: Inigo Fernandez Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: Looters halted in Spain
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48994 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48995 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48996 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48997 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48998 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48999 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: Ways of Being Roman
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49000 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49001 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49002 From: M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49003 From: M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49004 From: M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49005 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49006 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Title's of City Officer's
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49007 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: Title's of City Officer's
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49008 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: Title's of City Officer's
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49009 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: Ways of Being Roman
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49010 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: RE :Italian pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49011 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49012 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: RE :Italian pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49013 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: RE :Italian pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49014 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: RE Italian: pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49015 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: RE :Italian pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49016 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: Title's of City Officer's
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49017 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: RE :Italian pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49018 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: appointment of scribas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49019 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49020 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: RE :Italian pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49021 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Nova Roma Wiki, 2/10/2007, 12:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49022 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: RE :Italian pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49023 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49024 From: gentisanglorum Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49025 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49026 From: M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49027 From: M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49028 From: M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49029 From: M. CVRIATIVS COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-02-11
Subject: Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49030 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-11
Subject: a.d. III Id. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49031 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-02-11
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49032 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-02-11
Subject: REVISED AGENDA IN THE OPEN SESSION OF THE SENATE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49033 From: M. CVRIATIVS COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-02-11
Subject: Re: REVISED AGENDA IN THE OPEN SESSION OF THE SENATE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49034 From: Gaius Marius Merullus Date: 2007-02-11
Subject: Suffragium C Marii Merulli
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49035 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2007-02-11
Subject: Re: Suffragium Q. Fabi Maximi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49036 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2007-02-11
Subject: Re: REVISED AGENDA IN THE OPEN SESSION OF THE SENATE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49037 From: Tita Artoria Marcella Date: 2007-02-11
Subject: Factio Russata mailing list
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49038 From: M·C·C· Date: 2007-02-12
Subject: Re: REVISED AGENDA IN THE OPEN SESSION OF THE SENATE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49039 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-12
Subject: prid. Id. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49040 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-12
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49041 From: gentisanglorum Date: 2007-02-12
Subject: Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49042 From: M·C·C· Date: 2007-02-12
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49043 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-02-12
Subject: Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48868 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Kal. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est Kalendis Februariis; haec dies nefastus publicus est.


"His [Numa Pompilius'] regulations, moreover, that tended to inspire
frugality and moderation in the life of the individual citizen and to
create a passion for justice, which preserves the harmony of the
State, were exceedingly numerous, some of them being comprehended in
written laws, and others not written down by embodied in custom and
long usage. To treat of all these would be a difficult task; but
mention of the two of them which have been most frequently cited will
suffice to give evidence of the rest. First, to the end that people
should be content with what they had and should not covet what
belonged to others, there was the law that appointed boundaries to
every man's possessions. For, having ordered every one to draw a line
around his own land and to place stones on the bounds, he consecrated
these stones to Jupiter Terminalis and ordained that all should
assemble at the place every year on a fixed day and offer sacrifices
to them; and he made the festival in honour of these gods of
boundaries among the most dignified of all. This festival the Romans
call Terminalia, from the boundaries, and the boundaries themselves,
by the change of one letter as compared with our language, they call
termines. He also enacted that, if any person demolished or displaced
these boundary stones he should be looked upon as devoted to the god,
to the end that anyone who wished might kill him a sacrilegious person
with impunity and without incurring any stain of guilt. He
established this law with reference not only to private possessions
but also to those belonging to the public; for he marked these also
with boundary stones, to the end that the gods of boundaries might
distinguish the lands of the Romans from those of their neighbours,
and the public lands from such as belonged to private persons.
Memorials of this custom are observed by the Romans down to our times,
purely as a religious form. For they look upon these boundary stones
as gods and sacrifice to them yearly, offering up no kind of animal
(for it is not lawful to stain these stones with blood), but cakes
made of cereals and other first-fruits of the earth. But they ought
still to observe the motive, as well, which led Numa to regard these
boundary stones as gods and content themselves with their own
possessions without appropriating those of others either by violence
or by fraud; whereas now there are some who, in disregard of what is
best and of the example of their ancestors, instead of distinguishing
that which is theirs from that which belongs to others, set as bounds
to their possessions, not the law, but their greed to possess
everything, — which is disgraceful behaviour. But we leave the
considerations of these matters to others." - Dionysius of
Halicarnassus, "Roman Antiquities" 2.74


"At the start of the month they say that Juno the Saviour (Sospita),
Neighbouring the Phrygian Mother, was honoured with new shrines.
If you ask where those temples, dedicated to the goddess
On the Kalends, are now, they are fallen with the lapse of time.
All the rest would have similarly fallen in ruins,
But for the far-sighted concern of our sacred Leader,
Under whose rule the shrines are untouched by age:
Not satisfied with mere men, he also serves the gods.
Pious one, you who build and repair the temples,
May there be mutual care between you and the gods!
May the gods grant you the length of years you grant them,
And may they stand on guard before your house!
On this day too the grove of Alernus is crowded,
Near where Tiber, from afar, meets the ocean waves.
At Numa's sanctuary, and the Thunderer's on the Capitol,
And on the summit of Jove's citadel, a sheep is sacrificed.
Often the sky, covered with cloud, rains heavily,
Or the earth is hidden under a blanket of snow." - Ovid, Fasti II

February is dedicated to the god Mars and to His mother, Iuno (as Iuno
Sospita). The name Februarius, the modern February, is probably
derived from the Latin word februum, religious purification, or from
februa, instruments of purification, or perhaps from the name of the
obscure Etruscan deity Februus. He originally belonged to the Sabine
people of the Apennines. The Etruscans were also very keen on him, but
he was borrowed by the conquering Romans who were looking for a decent
purifying God to help with the spring-cleaning. Most of the festival
days in February are days of solemn religious observance, dedicated to
honoring and propitiating the spirits of the ancestors. February is a
month in which particular reverence was shown to the spirits of
deceased ancestors. In a familiar cultural dichotomy in which both
death and life were celebrated, this was a month devoted to fertility,
both of men and women, and of the land. Many of the rites had vestiges
of agricultural overtones. It may be more than coincidence that the
dead, who were either buried or considered to be in the "underworld",
and the fruits of agriculture, both relate to the earth.


Valete bene,

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Ovid, Theoi Project, Wikipedia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48869 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: The cries of the Britons
C Marcius Crispus omnibus SPD

I read with interest the history of events in 2001, which included a reference to the entire Province of Britannica breaking with Nova Roma.

Can anyone please supply more information about this as regards the Province, both then and since this time?

As a new citizen, one of the first things I did was to look for the relevant page, expecting to find information about my own Province, merely to discover absolutely nothing. I am sure other Britons will have been similarly disappointed.

There are surely a number of citizens, including some newly-admitted ones, who are Britons, and I wonder what can be done to try to bring we citizens together as a group and work to restore the Province. Could anyone out there suggest what we should do, and help us make a start? Perhaps Nova Roma could help its british citizens play more of a role as a Province of the Res Publica.

Any information or suggestions would be most gratefully received.

And would any other Brits be interested in getting a team together to do whatever is necessary to reconstitute the Province? If so, please lets get together.


Valete optime!

Gaius Marcius Crispus



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48870 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Salve Gai Marci, et salvete omnes,

C Marcius Crispus <jbshr1pwa@...> writes:

> Can anyone please supply more information about this as regards the
> Province, both then and since this time?

Britannia has had an on-again, off-again situation in the last six years.
It's two most active citizens for a while were A. Apollonius Cordus, who I
imagine will eventually respond to your question, and G. Livia who built a
beautiful website and became governor and then a senator. Unfortunately for
all, graduate school seems to have eaten both of them. They have not been
especially active since the Nova Roma conventus at Hadrian's Wall during the
summer of 2006.

We do have a few other britons who poke their noses in here from time to time.
Perhaps they're all still recovering from their experiences at Hadrian's
Wall?

Anyhow Crispe, your countrymen are represented in Nova Roma. They're just
being quiet right now.

Vale, et valete,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48871 From: Lucius Cassius Cornutus Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Kalends ritual to Janus
KALENDS RITUAL FOR JANUS

PRAEPARATIO:
In preparation for the rite, I woke before sunrise and I cleaned and
incensed my shrine to Ianus. Then I bathed in preparation, garbed in
toga, capite velato I offered to my Lares and lit the focus with
prayers and offerings to Mother Vesta, Goddess of the Hearth Fire.
The mood was calm as was the weather...cold, but calm.

PRAEFATIO:
- Silentium: "Procul, O procul, este profane!"

I then performed a final cleansing, aspersing area and washing my hands:
"Haec aqua a corpore impuritates eluat, ut pluvial aera purgat."

"Be well, Father Janus, Beginner of all things. Open please, the
Celestial Gates and look kindly and favorably on the Kalends ritual I
hold in your honor."
(Incense and wine are offered)

"Be well, Queen Juno, look down and preserve us. Accept this offering
of incense and look kindly and favorably upon me and the Senate and
people of Nova Roma."
(Incense is placed in focus)

"Queen Juno, in addition to my virtuous offering of incense, be
honored by this offering of wine that I pour in libation. May you look
kindly and favorably upon the Senate and people of Nova Roma."
(Libation is poured for the Goddess)

SACRIFICATIO:
Hands are washed again.
"Hear me Father Janus, who was before all the Gods, from whom all
things proceed, graciously lend your ears to my prayers, on this, the
Kalends of February. Janus Junonius, beginner of the month, attend and
bless your Senators and those of the people of Nova Roma, the Quirites."

Offer incense:
"Father Janus, by offering this incense to You I pray good prayers,
that you will look kindly and favorably upon me and the Senate and
People of Nova Roma."

Offer Libation:
"Father Janus, in addition to my virtuous offering of incense, be
honored by this offering of wine in libation and look kindly and
favorably upon me and the Senate and People of Nova Roma."

- Praecatio:
"Origin of the Gods, Janus, you who begins the year, the month, and
the day, you who when you appear the long ages are renewed, to you
Janus Junonius it is proper for offerings to be given at the beginning
of the month. On this day, the Kalends of February, may you accept
these offerings of libum cakes, honey and wine and bless the entire
nation of Nova Roma. Janus Junonius, may you be pleased by these
offerings and may the Senate and people of Nova Roma have what is
goodly, auspicious, fruitful, fortunate, and wholesome."

"Father Janus, to You I pray good prayers, offering You this pile of
cakes, so that you might willing be favorable to me and the Senate and
People of Nova Roma."

"Father Janus, I offer You this honey, so that You may be increased
and so that You may look kindly and favorably upon me and the Senate
and People of Nova Roma."
(drizzle honey over libum cakes.)

"Father Janus, for the same reasons given in the good prayers while
offering You piled cakes and honey, may You accept and be honored by
this portion of wine I pour."

"Father Janus, may the Senate and People of Nova Roma have what is
goodly, auspicious, fruitful, fortunate and wholesome. For these
reasons have I this day offered these sacrifices to you, Janus, God of
good beginnings."


LITATIO:
"Father Janus, I deservedly give great thanks for attending and
bearing witness to my rite."
(Offer incense and libation)

"Queen Juno, I deservedly give great thanks for attending and bearing
witness to my rite."
(Offer incense and libation)

"Mother Vesta, I deservedly give great thanks for attending and
bearing witness to my rite."
(Offer incense and libation)

"No more, Gods on high, do I ask of You today; it is enough."

PIACULUM:
"Gods Immortal, if anything I have done in this ceremony has been
incorrect, incomplete or otherwise displeasing to You, I ask
forgiveness with this offering of incense."

"Gods Immortal, if anything I have done in this ceremony has been
incorrect, incomplete or otherwise displeasing to You, I ask
forgiveness with this portion of wine I pour."

PERLITATIO:
I observed a sign ritual offerings were accepted.


Vale optime in pace Deorum.

Lucius Cassius Cornutus
Sacerdos Iani
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48872 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
C Marcius Crispus Equitie Marine omnibusque SPD

Thank you for your reply.

It would be good if enough of us brits could get together to get the website at http://www.britannia-provincia.co.uk working, with at least some information in it.

Any helpers?

Vale et valete omnes
Caius Marcius Crispus

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
Salve Gai Marci, et salvete omnes,

C Marcius Crispus <jbshr1pwa@...> writes:

> Can anyone please supply more information about this as regards the
> Province, both then and since this time?

Britannia has had an on-again, off-again situation in the last six years.
It's two most active citizens for a while were A. Apollonius Cordus, who I
imagine will eventually respond to your question, and G. Livia who built a
beautiful website and became governor and then a senator. Unfortunately for
all, graduate school seems to have eaten both of them. They have not been
especially active since the Nova Roma conventus at Hadrian's Wall during the
summer of 2006.

We do have a few other britons who poke their noses in here from time to time.
Perhaps they're all still recovering from their experiences at Hadrian's
Wall?

Anyhow Crispe, your countrymen are represented in Nova Roma. They're just
being quiet right now.

Vale, et valete,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48873 From: M·C·C· Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: REPORT OF SENATE SESSION
Senate Voting Results

The Senate was called to order on Jan. 18th 2007. The Contio was held on agenda items until Jan. 23rd 2007

Voting on the agenda items was then held from Jan. 23rd , 24:00 to Jan. 31st 2007, 24:00 (time of Rome).

On 31st of January, the latest session of the Senate of Nova Roma was declared closed by the Consul L. Arminius Faustus, in which 33 of the 38 senatores voted, fulfilling the quorum needed for the session.


Here are the list of the voting Senators, alfabetically listed by nomen:

[SAS] Sextus Apollonius Scipio
[FAC] Franciscus Apulus Caesar
[LAF] Lucius Arminius Faustus
[MAM] Marcus Arminius Maior
[MBA] Marcus Bianchius Antonius
[PC] Patricia Cassia
[ECF] Emilia Curia Finnica
[CCS] Caius Curius Saturninus
[GEC] Gaius Equitius Cato
[GEM] Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
[LECA] Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus Augur
[GFBM] Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
[CFBQ] Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
[QFM] Quintus Fabius Maximus
[CFD] Caius Flavius Diocletianus
[TGP] Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
[AMA] Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia
[MMPH] Marcus Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
[MIP] Marcus Iulius Perusianus
[DIPI] Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus
[GMM] Gaius Marius Merullus
[LMS] Lucius Minicius Sceptius
[MMA] Marcus Minucius Audens
[PMS] Pompeia Minucia Strabo
[MOG] Marcus Octavius Gracchus
[TOPA] Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus
[GPL] Gaius Popillius Laenas
[GSA] Gnaeus Salvius Astur
[JSM] Julilla Sempronia Magna
[LSA] Lucius Sergius Australicus
[QSP] Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
[ATS ] A. Tullia Scholastica
[ATMC] Appius Tullius Marcellus Cato


SENATE AGENDA STARTS


Item I - Appointment of interpreters

1a. Titus Arminius Genialis as interpreter of PORTUGUESE

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS to all. They have been doing excellent work already
in the Wiki
GEM - Uti Rogas
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all, with thanks for work already accomplished.
MMA- "a" through "c" -- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS UTI ROGAS I thank them very much for their willingness to serve.
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to all.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas
CCS: Uti rogas to all
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas for all.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS for both the candidates.
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM -Vti rogas I vote to appoint all three in item I
ATS: Vt� rog�s. Geni�lis has an excellent command of English, and seems quite eager to work.
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Titus Arminius Geniales is appointed as interpreter portuguese

1b. According Lex Cornelia, creation of the office of HUNGARIAN Interpreter, and appointment of Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus as its first interpreter.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS to all. They have been doing excellent work already
in the Wiki
GEM - Uti Rogas
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all, with thanks for work already accomplished.
MMA- "a" through "c" -- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS UTI ROGAS I thank them very much for their willingness to serve.
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to all.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas
CCS: Uti rogas to all
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas for all.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS for both the candidates.
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM -Vti rogas I vote to appoint all three in item I
ATS: Vt� rog�s. Lentulus is a fine young man, and a graduate student in classics who is devoted to Rome and Nova Roma.
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus is appointes Hungarian interpeter

1c. Titus Octavius Avitus as interpreter of FRENCH.

QSP - UTI ROGAS I thank these citizens for their interest and dedication
MOG: UTI ROGAS to all. They have been doing excellent work already
in the Wiki
GEM - Uti Rogas
TGP - VTI ROGAS. I appreciate their willingness to serve
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all

CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all, with thanks for work already accomplished.
MMA- "a" through "c" -- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS I thank them very much for their willingness to serve.
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to all.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas
CCS: Uti rogas to all
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas for all.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS for both the candidates.
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM -Vti rogas I vote to appoint all three in item I
ATS: Vt� rog�s. I have had correspondence with this gentleman as well, and his training and level of competency in French seem to be at a very high level.
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Util Rogas: Titus Octavius Avitus is appointed as interpreter of FRENCH



Item II - Appointment of propraetores proconsulesqve

2a. Lucius Aurelius Severus as propraetor of CANADA ORIENTALIS.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS
GEM Uti Rogas
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all..
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS.
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there.
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with my sincere thanks.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Lucius Aurelius Severus is appointed as propraetor of CANADA ORIENTALIS

2b. Gnaeus Iulius Caesar as propraetor of CANADA OCCIDENTALIS.

QSP - UTI ROGAS and with great appreciation for his skills and
dedication.
MOG: UTI ROGAS
GEM - Uti Rogas, with my particular thanks to Gn. Iulius for being willing to
continue in office. Our western Canadian group is small, but of very high
quality.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS. Gaenus is a fine example of Roman virtue. I believe he ought to be a Senator.
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincial
ATMC - UTI ROGAS.
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with my sincere thanks.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar is appointed as propraetor of CANADA OCCIDENTALIS

2c. Titus Arminius Genialis as propraetor of BRASILIA.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS
GEM - Uti Rogas
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with my sincere thanks.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Titus Arminius Genialis is appointed as propraetor of BRASILIA

2d. Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus as propraetor of PANNONIA.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS
GEM - Uti Rogas. Lentulus is a superb citizen, and an able magistrate.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS. I'm happy that the Pannonia will be in good hands.
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with my sincere thanks.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus is appointed as propraetor of PANNONIA


2e. Titus Iulius Sabinus as propraetor of DACIA.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS
GEM- Uti Rogas. Sabinus is one of our very best. Dacia is fortunate to have him.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS. I support Sabinus, a very skilled magistrates with excellent idea.
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with my sincere thanks.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s. Sab�nus is a dedicated, hardworking, citizen who should be cloned.
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Titus Iulius Sabinusis appointed as propraetor of DACIA.

2f. Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus as proconsul of LACUS MAGNI.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS
GEM - Uti Rogas. My thanks to Gaius Fabius for his continued efforts on behalf of
the Republic.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS Very experienced citizen.
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with my sincere thanks.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s.
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus is appointed as proconsul of LACUS MAGNI


2g. Caius Curius Saturninus as propraetor of THULE.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS
GEM - Uti Rogas. Another first rate citizen. I am pleased he is willing to
continue to serve.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS Saturninus is one of our most active and intelligent citizen.
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with my sincere thanks.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s.
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Caius Curius Saturninus is appointed as propraetor of THULE.




2h. Quintus Fabius Maximus as proconsul of CALIFORNIA.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: ANTIQUO. We've seen nothing but decline in that province for
five years. It's time for an active governor.
GEM - Antiquo. It is time and past time for California to have another governor. Better the governorship of California be left empty a few months than it be saddled for yet another year with a governor who does nothing and suppresses the efforts of others to do things within his province.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: ANTIQUO
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA: "h"�ABSTAIN
In regards to Senator Maximus and Provincia California, his provided plan looks pretty good to me. He is having the same kind of difficulty in California, that I am seeing in Nova Britannia. We do not always agree, however, I trust that what he says, he will do his best to accomplish. Additionally, I see no other governor candidate for that province, and I strongly disagree that no governor is better than the existing one. �MMA
I have made an error in my vote. I voted to Abstain my vote for Senator Maximus as a governor. I want to change that error to read:
"YES" for Governor Maximus and to
"ABSTAIN" for Governor Marcus Audens.
My thanks to Senator Maximus for alerting me to my error. My apologies for any difficulty that this error has caused.
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS �ANTIQUO
MMPH - ANTIQUO
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: ANTIQUO. We need to stop the decline, and a new governor is part
of the solution.
GFBM: Antiquo
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : ANTIQUO
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: ANTIQVO
ECF: Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC � ABSTAIN
LAF : ANTIQVO - The absence of people of California so long time, a culturally so rich environment, makes me worry about the capacity of the governor. We used to use the W.O. rule - nobody steps down, the sole willing citizen becomes the wining candidate. Well, I think on this case it is not working anymore.
CFBQ: Antiquo
FAC: ANTIQVO California needs an active governor
CSA - I vote against.
MAM: Antiquo.
AMA: Antiquo.
SAS: Abstineo.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Antiqu�
GEC: Uti Rogas

12 Uti Rogas, 2 Abstineo and 19 Antiquo: Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT appointed as proconsul of CALIFORNIA

2i. C. Sempronia Graccha Volentia as propraetor of AMERICA MEDIOCCIDENTALIS SUPERIOR

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS.
GEM: Uti Rogas.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF: VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with gratitude.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s. She has done a good job with the calendar distribution in the US, and with various sodalitates.
The title, however, should be propraetr�x in her case.
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: C. Sempronia Graccha Volentia is appointed as propraetrix of AMERICA MEDIOCCIDENTALIS SUPERIOR

2j. Fl. Galerius Aurelianus as propraetor of AMERICA AUSTRORIENTALIS

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS.
GEM - Uti Rogas, with my thanks to Propraetor Galerius for his active and
enthusiastic service.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF:VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with gratitude.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s.
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Fl. Galerius Aurelianus is appointed as propraetor of AMERICA AUSTRORIENTALIS

2k. Tiberius Galerius Paulinus as proconsul of AMERICA MEDIATLANTICA.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS.
GEM: Uti Rogas, by whatever title, a good governor.
TGP � ABSTINEO
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF: VTI ROGAS. although I think he would have really considered pass to
another citizen, due to the burden of the consulship this year.
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with gratitude.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s, though this is, as one of the honored senatores had noted, a heavy burden in conjunction with the c�nsul�tus.
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus is appointed as proconsul of AMERICA MEDIATLANTICA

2l. Marcus Minucius Audens as proconsul of NOVA BRITANNIA.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS.
GEM: Uti Rogas, with my thanks for his long years of service.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
I have made an error in my vote. I voted to Abstain my vote for Senator Maximus as a governor. I want to change that error to read:
"YES" for Governor Maximus and to
"ABSTAIN" for Governor Marcus Audens.
My thanks to Senator Maximus for alerting me to my error. My apologies for any difficulty that this error has caused.
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF: VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS He is an example for us as man and as governor
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with gratitude.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s.
GEC: Uti Rogas

32 Uti Rogas and 1 Abstineo: Marcus Minucius Audens is appointed as proconsul of NOVA BRITANNIA.

2m. Lucius Didius Geminus Sceptius as propraetor of HISPANIA.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS.
GEM: Uti Rogas. Lucius Didius continues to serve the Republic and his province
well. Few outside Hispania realize just how much he does.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF: VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS I see again great projects for Hispania.
CSA - I abstain.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with gratitude.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s, though the gentleman has pointed out that his nomen is now Minicius (as it has been for some time), not the historically-inaccurate and linguistically impossible Didius Geminus. His correct name is thus L. Minicius Sceptius.
GEC: Uti Rogas

31 Uti Rogas and 2 Abstineo: Lucius Minicius Sceptius is appointed as propraetor of HISPANIA



Item III - Senatusconsultum - "De consulibus et proconsulibus"

In keeping with the authority granted to the Senate by Article III, Paragraph 3, of the Constitution, (Please note that this is a change only to their title, and has no impact on their duties, powers, and
functions).
Currently-serving Consuls governing provinces shall be titled Consul.
Former Consuls who are continuing to govern a province after their term as Consul ends shall be titled Proconsul.
Magistrates appointed by the Senate to govern a particular province for the first time shall be titled Praetor.
Praetors who continue to govern a province after their first term of office ends shall be titled Propraetor.

Magistrates appointed by governors to assist in the administration of their province who shares the governor�s Imperium shall be titled Legate

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: ANTIQUO.
GEM: Antiquo. Only the Comitia Centuriata may make a Praetor. Thus I can not
support this proposal.
TGP - VTI ROGAS This simply adds the new title of Italy to the
current SC on titles
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS: Uti Rogas
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: ANTIQUO
MMA -- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Antiquo
Comment: There seems to be a flaw in this in that the Senate should not be empowered to appoint someone to be a praetor. Beyond that, this seemingly endless topic of seeking exactly the "right" title for every position seems to be a great waste of time and energy.
PMS �ANTIQUO
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM � ANTIQVO. Ironic since I pushed for this. But I believe we must reword it better.
TOPA: ANTIQUO. It is dangerous calling governators Praetors without a law or preferably constitutional amendment to separate them from the "real" Praetors.
GFBM: Antiquo. I would prefer the usage of something other than Praetor.
GPL - Antiquo. As has been pointed out, only the people can create a praetor.
MBA : ANTIQUO
DIPI: ANTIQUO. Marinus is right, the senate can not make a praetor, only give propraetorian powers, thus the use of the term "propraetor" during previous years.
CCS: Antiquo
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Antiquo
ATMC - ANTIQUO
LAF: VTI ROGAS - This Senatusconsultum changes nothing, just titles.
CFBQ: Antiquo
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Abstineo.
AMA: Antiquo.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Nego I vote not to approve the senatusconsultum now, understanding that the language differentiating praetor and propraetor will be developed for resubmission.
ATS: Antiqu�. As proposed here, the title praetor seems inaccurate and inappropriate.
GEC: Antiquo. I prefer the usage of the available (and historic) terminology rather than than "praetor".

13 Uti Rogas, 1 Abstineo and 19 Antiquo: Senatusconsultum not passed



Item IV - Senatusconsultum - "De Italia"

The attribute "province" is removed from the description of Italy within Nova Roma.

It will be govern as a province under the rules adopted by the Senate but will be called Italia.

The "governor" of Italy shall be called Praefectus Italiae. If a sitting Consul or Praetor resides in Italy and they serve as "governor" on behalf of the Senate of Nova Roma they shall be called Consul or Praetor.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS.
GEM: Uti Rogas.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS: Uti Rogas
CFD: Antiquo The proposal has it�s ancient roots in times later than that of the republic we try to reconstruct. More important for me is that we need a territorial organization adequate to our internet-based micornational character. Italia is de facto a province and should de facto bear the title of a province. A province is governed by a promagistrate, the titles we adjusted above. Some adjustments to our current times and structures are necessary.
PC: UTI ROGAS.
MMA -- NO;

I had originally thought to approve this item, but the arguments against it are, to me, quite telling. This decision of mine, has nothing to do with personalities �MMA
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Antiquo Comment: There appears to be no real reason for this proposal other than that it will make the Italians feel good. If that's a motive, perhaps we should make all citizens everywhere feel good by dropping the term "province" from the titles of all regions of Nova Roma.
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - ANTIQVO
Italia should be an equal to all provinces. To single her out just because she contains Rome is silly and sets a precedent.
TOPA: UTI ROGAS.
GFBM: Uti Rogas.
GPL- Antiquo. I agree with Senators Australicus, Cincinnatus, and Diocletianus.
MBA : UTI ROGAS. I like the idea of honouring Italia, for they are the home of Rome.
DIPI: Antiquo
CCS: Uti rogas. Many thanks for our Consules for making this change!
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas. This is a great improvement to our credibility.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF: VTI ROGAS, we cannot deny this honour to Italia
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour. It was due time that this old reivindication of our Italian co-citizens be recognized.
MAM: Abstineo.
AMA: Uti Rogas
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to honor Italia in this way.
ATS: Vt� rog�s
GEC: Uti Rogas

26 Uti Rogas, 1 Abstineo and 6 Antiquo: Senatusconsultum passed



Item V - Senatusconsultum - "Senatus Consultum de Regendis Provinciis"

I. The SenatusConsultum of 11 March 2001 is hereby revoked. For all purposes of this text, the English word "governor" replaces the Latin terms "propraetor" or "proconsul". In the absence of the consuls,these instructions should be followed by the magistrate with the highest Imperium available granted by the Republic (such as the praetor, dictator or interrex).
II. At the beginning of their terms of office, but prior to the Ides of February, the consuls are asked to issue an edictum calling for the governors for the upcoming year. The consuls will be responsible for
setting the period during which applications will be taken in accordance with their planning of the Senate's agenda.
III. The term of a governor starts immediately after issuance of the Senate results of the approvals on the Main List. The term of a governor ends with that of a new governor for the province (or the
same, in case of prorogation ) or on the Ides (15th) of March, or whichever happens first. Any change before the term is the responsibility of the Senate.
IV. For provinces with a budget at their disposal, the Senate asks the consuls to choose one of the quaestors to help the governor in making jointly the report of expenses. The consuls shall take geographic and cultural patterns into account for making the assignment.
V. The Senate asks the consuls to not accept candidates that are not allowed by NR law to become governors. If a current governor fails to send the Senate the financial report of the province (if needed) by the time for calling of new governors, the Senate advises the consuls not to accept the name of this citizen for prorogation.

QSP - UTI ROGAS to all v
MOG: UTI ROGAS.
GEM: Uti Rogas.
TGP � Abstain
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS: Uti Rogas
CFD: Abstino.
PC: UTI ROGAS.
MMA -- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Abstineo
PMS �ABSTAIN
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - ANTIQVO
While I under stand what this is suppose to say, it�s badly written and needs revision
TOPA: UTI ROGAS.
GFBM: Uti Rogas.
GPL :Uti Rogas
MBA: UTI ROGAS. I like this. It clears the way for more accurate titles.
DIPI: Abstineo
CCS: Uti rogas.
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas
ATMC � ABSTAIN
LAF: VTI ROGAS, it makes things clearer
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour
MAM: Abstineo.
AMA: Uti Rogas
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to adopt this senatusconsultum.
ATS: Vt� rog�s, though not without some hesitation.
GEC: Uti Rogas

25 Uti Rogas, 7 Abstineo and 1 Antiquo: Senatusconsultum passed.



Item VI - Senatusconsultum - "De Aquila"

Senatus Consultum on the Aquila Newsletter.

The Senate authorizes the Editor Commentariorum, Ap. Galerius Aurelianus, to solicit subscriptions, in an amount determined by him but not exceeding $20.00USD per subscription for a printed Aquila
Newsletter." Individuals may if the like make donations in addition to taking out a subscription.

He is further authorized to solicit donations to off-set the costs of publishing the Aquila newsletter for the year L. Arminio Ti. Galerio cos. The number of copies, per issue, to be printed shall be
determined by the Editor Commentariorum, with the advice of his staff and advisors, based on the cost of production, delivery and the amount of money collected.

The Senate requires that 2/3 of the total cost of the newsletter be covered by direct subscriptions and / or donations. No more than 1/3 of the total cost will be covered by the Nova Roma treasury.

The Editor Commentariorum, Ap. Galerius Aurelianus, will also publish or cause to be published, a free web version of the Aquila newsletter. He shall do so in a manner determined by him


QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS. A printed newsletter is desperately needed for our credibility, else were are nothing more than a collection of mailing lists and web sites. We don't need yet another web site; we need a newsletter.
GEM: Uti Rogas, with the caution that the Editor Commentariorum must strive to cover all operating costs with paid subscription fees. The 1/3 amount specified in the text is an upper bound, and not something that he should consider 'money in the bank.'
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS: Abstineo
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: ANTIQUO. More needs to be known about the financial aspects of this move, and whether we have the volunteers available to do the work of producing, printing and mailing this Aquila.
MMA --YES; I had originally thought to disapprove of this issue because of the mention of allotting NR funding to support it. However, I agree with those who seek a more specific and detailed item signifying NR to the outside world. I believe this newsletter will help in this effort.
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS - ANTIQUO I believe we should be doing the audit first before awarding any monies, except for a strict emergency situation. Moreover, I would like to know a figure of how much is being requested of the Senate as opposed to a given percentage of the costs.
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM � VTI ROGAS
TOPA: ANTIQUO. Put in an upper limit as to how much the third that Nova Roma is supposed to cover may be, otherwise I'm in support.
GFBM: Uti Rogas. However, I don't think our publications need take any money from our treasury. I believe they can be self-sufficient.
GPL :Uti Rogas
MBA: UTI ROGAS.
DIPI: Uti rogas. It will be good to see a hard copy of the Eagle again.
CCS: Antiquo.
MIP: ABSTINEO
ECF: Antiquo. A fixed sum would be more preferable.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF: ABSTINEO, I said once we should not approve anything without a detailed budget. I miss one on this case. Once, the Aquila budget administration was a disaster. So, for approve without doubt, It would be very suitable an detailed budget.
CFBQ: Antiquo
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour
MAM: Abstineo.
AMA: Uti Rogas
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to adopt this senatusconsultum.
ATS: Abstine�.
GEC: Uti Rogas

22 Uti Rogas, 5 Abstineo and 6 Antiquo: Senatusconsultum passed.

COMMENTS OF SENATORES
Item VII - Contio about 2/3

"Last year, the subject of the 2/3 of the Senate needed to approve a constitutional reform has been touched due to many doubts of interpretation. There was some division of opinions between the
magistrates. The question remained unsolved, and some senatores asked the current consuls to continue the subject.

There is currently two interpretations of the law, both with merits. According to the Historical procedures of Ancient Rome, and obeying the seniority of the conscript fathers, we invite all senatores to discuss the question,on the hope some light can be better brought to the subject. There is no voting, just a refreshment of the question.

One interpretation says the text of the Constitution means "2/3 of the entire Senate" means all citizens entitled to vote in the Senate.

The other means "2/3 of the entire Senate" means all voting senatores , ie, by "Senate" is recognized the senatores present to a voting.

So we invite the senatores to give their opinions during the voting.

We hope the fathers understand everything on the Republic can be accomplished with a powerful agreement, and we together can reach to a reasonable and republican approuch.

QSP - I would rather have a straight vote passed by numbers rather than the 2/3 formula. I think the 2/3 system could be stifling and frustrating, slowing things down; also, more often than not there are
always 5 or 6 senators who do not make the voting and that does not help at all.

MOG - The Constitution is broken. The author never foresaw a Senate with a high absentee rate. Either the Constitution needs to be fixed so that a 2/3rds majority of voting Senators (when a quorum is present) are sufficient, or we're going to have to start tossing people out of the Senate if we ever want to be able to make any changes.

GEM - The text of the Constitution is clear. 2/3 of all the persons enrolled in the Album Senatorium must vote in favor of a Constitutional Amendment for it to pass. I recommend that Censors M. Octavius Gracchus and C. Fabius Buteo Modianus exercise their constitutionally granted authority to remove inactive senators from the Album Senatorium as quickly as possible, in order to preserve the effectiveness of this Senate.

TGP Our constitution has clauses that are at times contradictorily. This is not one of those times. I believe that the only way one can interpret the constitution is to look at its plain language . "2/3 of the entire Senate" means "2/3 of the entire Senate"

JSM - The constitution should be modified only in extreme circumstances. A policy regarding absenteeism of senatores ought to be developed and rigorously applied.

LSM - I support a 2/3 of the voting senators. If there are people who doesn't care about what is under voting at any moment on the organization they belong to, and give no proxy or representation, they can be count as "mind absence" people. So only 2/3 of the people who really care and participate.

CFD: I prefer a historical argumentation. In ancient times many Senators were unable to be present in Senate sessions due to commitments overseas, in wars acting as officers, in diplomatic missions, as provincial magistrates. This means that our ancient forefathers had a Senate which was imho quite never complete. Today a simple network breakdown can cut more than one Senatr off communication, that�s comparable for me.
The 2/3 quorum can in my opinion only be counted from the Senators present at a specific session.

PC: I agree with the Constitution as currently written.

MMA (no vote) -- I do not agree that the Constitution is unclear on this question. It is quite clear to me, and the concern lies in two areas. The first, and most important one, to my thought, is the responsibility of the Senators so appointed. It is a significant honor to be elected to this office or to be appointed by one's peers. It also has a significant responsibility. If any Senator is not concerned about the responsibility he or she should be removed from that position. The second concern is the problem of communication methodology. Yahoo has not in the past proven to be so exact in their support that I should be willing to dismiss a Senator solely on the basis of Yahoo's message delivery record. Two items to consider in this question.

LECA - The Constitution stipulates 2/3 of the ENTIRE Senate must vote to ratify any change to it. It does not say anything other than that, not "of those who vote", not "minus those who abstain", et cetera.
There is only one *Honest* interpretation of the statement, "... such alterations to this Constitution must be ratified by a vote of two-thirds of the entire Senate before they shall take effect...", any less than 2/3's of the entire Senate voting to ratify is not enough to pass an amendment/change.
What should be done? Let the system work for once, BEFORE monkeying around with it.
Why is it that each new administration is in such a rush to make changes?
We've been through this drill many times the past years and I haven't honestly seen any changes that have made Nova Roma better, more complicated, but not better.

LSA - comment: It is my opinion that this provision of the Constitution should remain unaltered and should be understood to mean what it clearly says - that 2/3 of all the members of the Senate must approve a change to the Constitution. Senators not participating for an extended period of time should be removed by the Censors.

PMS - I do not see the ambiguity in current constitutional language itself...For years it has been unquestioned as meaning 2/3 of this entire senate , just as it reads. This 2/3 has shown to be attainable in the past when Senators have voted regularily. I, with other Senators, think it is time to tighten the criteria of participation for Senators to maintain their positions among this august body.

MMPH � No comments

QFM - This is a vote with no division possible. But for informative purposes it is very apparent that 2/3rds of the ENTIRE appointed SENATE must vote to ratify any change to this Constitution. Other wise it would read � THOSE SENATORS PRESENT� in the text.
So to make it official: VTI ROGAS to the interpetation that the vote must pass with 2/3rds of the entire Senate.
Not just those Senators present.

TOPA: UTI ROGAS - as I believe the phrase would have interpreted by the romans and how I believe it should be used. If it cannot be interpreted that way, I am for a constitutional amendment to the same effect.

GFBM: I agree with M. Octavius Gracchus in that there are problems in our constitution. There are also too many senators who don't vote. If someone is a senator and doesn't have the time or interest they need to let the Censores know about it so they can be removed. I think the constitution does indicate 2/3 of the whole senate, but I think this should be changed.

GPL : It seems to me the Constitution is very clear. A 2/3rds vote of the entire Senate is required.

MBA: After reviewing the constitution, I am of the belief that 2/3 of the entire Senate means just that. We, as Senators, need to be responsible and vote. I missed one vote at the beginning of last year and I still feel that I violated a trust that was given to me.

DIPI - (No vote required.) There is no ambiguity in the constitution on this matter. It clearly states votes of 2/3rds of the *entire* senate is required to pass a constitutional amendment, not 2/3rds of those voting.
This has never really been a problem before last year, so perhaps part of the issue was last year's leadership. In the past, if consuls were afraid of not getting enough votes, they would lobby senators privately and in the senate, saying why a vote was important and why a senator's vote was important and needed. They would lead.
As for high absenteeism of late, again it may be an issue of last year's leadership. It may also be due to the cheapening of the senate the year before that, when 11 or 12 people were added (increasing our numbers by about 1/3) to the senate in one year by the censores. That stacking of the senate made it much more difficult to add worthy people to the senate in following years because of the required senator to assidui ratio. It made the title of senator mean less and may have encouraged people to stay away from this chamber more than they would have.

CCS - Uti rogas. Senator Pius has already pointed out same comments I intended to.

MIP: VTI ROGAS

ECF: Uti rogas.

ATMC � No comments

LAF: Since the ancient roman senatores never ever counted missing senatores, I believe the constitution means 2/3 of the voting senatores. Anyway, I urge the Senate to consider even more �draconian� measures to keep citizens on the album Senatorium.

CFBQ - o change he Constitution to only include the voting Senatores in the 2/3 is both historical and practical. Although I encourage the Censores to get rid of Senatores who haven't voted for three times in a row, without asking for leave or having medical reasons.

FAC: No comments

CSA - Any "2/3 formula" will necessarily be historically inaccurate. I'd advocate for getting rid of this modernism altogether.

MAM: Abstineo.

AMA: I agree with the constitution as it is currently written, that 2/3 of all the persons enrolled in the Album Senatorium must vote.

SAS: Any such formula will not be accurate historically.

CMM - For the purpose of constitutional amendment only, the quorum should in my opinion remain 2/3 of the entire senate, not only of senators casting votes in session. To amend the constitution should be a rarity, and therefore, provisions aren't needed to facilitate it. For all other business, a simple majority of votes cast, discarding "abstineo", should determine the outcome. In this way, the senate can move forward while preserving the structure of Nova Roma's institutions.

ATS: For what it is worth, I cannot see how we can fail to interpret this as meaning two-thirds of all members considered part of the senate. Clearly, however, if paralysis is a problem because too few of the enrolled members vote, some pruning of inactive members should be done. Perhaps there could be sen�t�r�s �merit� who would not count toward the total.

GEC: I believe the lex Constitutiva should be left as it is.

Valete

M�CVRIATIVS�COMPLVTENSIS
TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
NOVA ROMA

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48874 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Agricola Crispo sal,


In the meantime, why not get some pages in the wiki? Several
provinciae are doing just that. You lose some flexibility design-wise,
but it is quick and easy.

optime vale!


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Bob Johnson <jbshr1pwa@...> wrote:
>
> C Marcius Crispus Equitie Marine omnibusque SPD
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> It would be good if enough of us brits could get together to get
the website at http://www.britannia-provincia.co.uk working, with at
least some information in it.
>
> Any helpers?
>
> Vale et valete omnes
> Caius Marcius Crispus
>
> Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
> Salve Gai Marci, et salvete omnes,
>
> C Marcius Crispus <jbshr1pwa@...> writes:
>
> > Can anyone please supply more information about this as regards the
> > Province, both then and since this time?
>
> Britannia has had an on-again, off-again situation in the last six
years.
> It's two most active citizens for a while were A. Apollonius Cordus,
who I
> imagine will eventually respond to your question, and G. Livia who
built a
> beautiful website and became governor and then a senator.
Unfortunately for
> all, graduate school seems to have eaten both of them. They have not
been
> especially active since the Nova Roma conventus at Hadrian's Wall
during the
> summer of 2006.
>
> We do have a few other britons who poke their noses in here from
time to time.
> Perhaps they're all still recovering from their experiences at Hadrian's
> Wall?
>
> Anyhow Crispe, your countrymen are represented in Nova Roma. They're
just
> being quiet right now.
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48875 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Crispus Agricola sal

Thanks, a useful idea.

Optime vale!

"M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@...> wrote:
Agricola Crispo sal,

In the meantime, why not get some pages in the wiki? Several
provinciae are doing just that. You lose some flexibility design-wise,
but it is quick and easy.

optime vale!

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Bob Johnson <jbshr1pwa@...> wrote:
>
> C Marcius Crispus Equitie Marine omnibusque SPD
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> It would be good if enough of us brits could get together to get
the website at http://www.britannia-provincia.co.uk working, with at
least some information in it.
>
> Any helpers?
>
> Vale et valete omnes
> Caius Marcius Crispus
>
> Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
> Salve Gai Marci, et salvete omnes,
>
> C Marcius Crispus <jbshr1pwa@...> writes:
>
> > Can anyone please supply more information about this as regards the
> > Province, both then and since this time?
>
> Britannia has had an on-again, off-again situation in the last six
years.
> It's two most active citizens for a while were A. Apollonius Cordus,
who I
> imagine will eventually respond to your question, and G. Livia who
built a
> beautiful website and became governor and then a senator.
Unfortunately for
> all, graduate school seems to have eaten both of them. They have not
been
> especially active since the Nova Roma conventus at Hadrian's Wall
during the
> summer of 2006.
>
> We do have a few other britons who poke their noses in here from
time to time.
> Perhaps they're all still recovering from their experiences at Hadrian's
> Wall?
>
> Anyhow Crispe, your countrymen are represented in Nova Roma. They're
just
> being quiet right now.
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48876 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Salve,

Well I'm not a brit, but I can help out with a website if you'd like. I currently host about half a dozen websites including my gens website here: http://minucia.ciarin.com/

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella



----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Johnson
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] The cries of the Britons


C Marcius Crispus Equitie Marine omnibusque SPD

Thank you for your reply.

It would be good if enough of us brits could get together to get the website at http://www.britannia-provincia.co.uk working, with at least some information in it.

Any helpers?

Vale et valete omnes
Caius Marcius Crispus

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
Salve Gai Marci, et salvete omnes,

C Marcius Crispus <jbshr1pwa@...> writes:

> Can anyone please supply more information about this as regards the
> Province, both then and since this time?

Britannia has had an on-again, off-again situation in the last six years.
It's two most active citizens for a while were A. Apollonius Cordus, who I
imagine will eventually respond to your question, and G. Livia who built a
beautiful website and became governor and then a senator. Unfortunately for
all, graduate school seems to have eaten both of them. They have not been
especially active since the Nova Roma conventus at Hadrian's Wall during the
summer of 2006.

We do have a few other britons who poke their noses in here from time to time.
Perhaps they're all still recovering from their experiences at Hadrian's
Wall?

Anyhow Crispe, your countrymen are represented in Nova Roma. They're just
being quiet right now.

Vale, et valete,

CN.EQVIT.MARINVS

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48877 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Crispus Marcella sal

Thanks very much for the offer.

Obviously I don't want to start anything until I have some backing, and chief of all I don't want to tread on any toes of those who may hold office in this Province (do they?) but help wiould be welcome.

Optime vale!

Annia Minucia Marcella <annia@...> wrote:
Salve,

Well I'm not a brit, but I can help out with a website if you'd like. I currently host about half a dozen websites including my gens website here: http://minucia.ciarin.com/

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella

----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Johnson
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] The cries of the Britons

C Marcius Crispus Equitie Marine omnibusque SPD

Thank you for your reply.

It would be good if enough of us brits could get together to get the website at http://www.britannia-provincia.co.uk working, with at least some information in it.

Any helpers?

Vale et valete omnes
Caius Marcius Crispus

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
Salve Gai Marci, et salvete omnes,

C Marcius Crispus <jbshr1pwa@...> writes:

> Can anyone please supply more information about this as regards the
> Province, both then and since this time?

Britannia has had an on-again, off-again situation in the last six years.
It's two most active citizens for a while were A. Apollonius Cordus, who I
imagine will eventually respond to your question, and G. Livia who built a
beautiful website and became governor and then a senator. Unfortunately for
all, graduate school seems to have eaten both of them. They have not been
especially active since the Nova Roma conventus at Hadrian's Wall during the
summer of 2006.

We do have a few other britons who poke their noses in here from time to time.
Perhaps they're all still recovering from their experiences at Hadrian's
Wall?

Anyhow Crispe, your countrymen are represented in Nova Roma. They're just
being quiet right now.

Vale, et valete,

CN.EQVIT.MARINVS

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48878 From: M·C·C· Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: CORRECTION OF THE REPORT OF SENATE SESSION
Salvete civibus Novae Romae:

I correct my previous report:

Item I - Appointment of interpreters

1a. Titus Arminius Genialis as interpreter of PORTUGUESE

The correct vote of Sen. Cincinnatus Augur [LECA] is VTI ROGAS, Since Consul Faustus recommends him he must be good.

This does not change the result of the voting

Item IV - Senatusconsultum - "De Italia"

The correct vote of Sen. Cincinnatus Augur [LECA] is ANTIQUO, Italia is equal to all provicia

This change the result of the voting: 25 Uti Rogas, 1 Abstineo and 7 Antiquo: Senatusconsultum passed instead of published result 26 Uti Rogas, 1 Abstineo and 6 Antiquo: Senatusconsultum passed.

I request your pardon by my mistake when doing the copypaste of votes

Valete bene

M�CVRIATIVS�COMPLVTENSIS
TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
NOVA ROMA
----- Mensaje original -----
De: M�C�C�
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
CC: ComitiaPlebisTributa@yahoogroups.com ; NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: jueves, 01 de febrero de 2007 15:46
Asunto: REPORT OF SENATE SESSION


Senate Voting Results

The Senate was called to order on Jan. 18th 2007. The Contio was held on agenda items until Jan. 23rd 2007

Voting on the agenda items was then held from Jan. 23rd , 24:00 to Jan. 31st 2007, 24:00 (time of Rome).

On 31st of January, the latest session of the Senate of Nova Roma was declared closed by the Consul L. Arminius Faustus, in which 33 of the 38 senatores voted, fulfilling the quorum needed for the session.


Here are the list of the voting Senators, alfabetically listed by nomen:

[SAS] Sextus Apollonius Scipio
[FAC] Franciscus Apulus Caesar
[LAF] Lucius Arminius Faustus
[MAM] Marcus Arminius Maior
[MBA] Marcus Bianchius Antonius
[PC] Patricia Cassia
[ECF] Emilia Curia Finnica
[CCS] Caius Curius Saturninus
[GEC] Gaius Equitius Cato
[GEM] Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
[LECA] Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus Augur
[GFBM] Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
[CFBQ] Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
[QFM] Quintus Fabius Maximus
[CFD] Caius Flavius Diocletianus
[TGP] Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
[AMA] Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia
[MMPH] Marcus Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
[MIP] Marcus Iulius Perusianus
[DIPI] Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus
[GMM] Gaius Marius Merullus
[LMS] Lucius Minicius Sceptius
[MMA] Marcus Minucius Audens
[PMS] Pompeia Minucia Strabo
[MOG] Marcus Octavius Gracchus
[TOPA] Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus
[GPL] Gaius Popillius Laenas
[GSA] Gnaeus Salvius Astur
[JSM] Julilla Sempronia Magna
[LSA] Lucius Sergius Australicus
[QSP] Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
[ATS ] A. Tullia Scholastica
[ATMC] Appius Tullius Marcellus Cato


SENATE AGENDA STARTS


Item I - Appointment of interpreters

1a. Titus Arminius Genialis as interpreter of PORTUGUESE

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS to all. They have been doing excellent work already
in the Wiki
GEM - Uti Rogas
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all, with thanks for work already accomplished.
MMA- "a" through "c" -- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS UTI ROGAS I thank them very much for their willingness to serve.
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to all.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas
CCS: Uti rogas to all
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas for all.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS for both the candidates.
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM -Vti rogas I vote to appoint all three in item I
ATS: Vt� rog�s. Geni�lis has an excellent command of English, and seems quite eager to work.
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Titus Arminius Geniales is appointed as interpreter portuguese

1b. According Lex Cornelia, creation of the office of HUNGARIAN Interpreter, and appointment of Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus as its first interpreter.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS to all. They have been doing excellent work already
in the Wiki
GEM - Uti Rogas
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all, with thanks for work already accomplished.
MMA- "a" through "c" -- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS UTI ROGAS I thank them very much for their willingness to serve.
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to all.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas
CCS: Uti rogas to all
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas for all.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS for both the candidates.
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM -Vti rogas I vote to appoint all three in item I
ATS: Vt� rog�s. Lentulus is a fine young man, and a graduate student in classics who is devoted to Rome and Nova Roma.
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus is appointes Hungarian interpeter

1c. Titus Octavius Avitus as interpreter of FRENCH.

QSP - UTI ROGAS I thank these citizens for their interest and dedication
MOG: UTI ROGAS to all. They have been doing excellent work already
in the Wiki
GEM - Uti Rogas
TGP - VTI ROGAS. I appreciate their willingness to serve
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all

CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all, with thanks for work already accomplished.
MMA- "a" through "c" -- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS I thank them very much for their willingness to serve.
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to all.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas
CCS: Uti rogas to all
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas for all.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS for both the candidates.
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM -Vti rogas I vote to appoint all three in item I
ATS: Vt� rog�s. I have had correspondence with this gentleman as well, and his training and level of competency in French seem to be at a very high level.
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Util Rogas: Titus Octavius Avitus is appointed as interpreter of FRENCH



Item II - Appointment of propraetores proconsulesqve

2a. Lucius Aurelius Severus as propraetor of CANADA ORIENTALIS.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS
GEM Uti Rogas
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all..
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS.
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there.
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with my sincere thanks.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Lucius Aurelius Severus is appointed as propraetor of CANADA ORIENTALIS

2b. Gnaeus Iulius Caesar as propraetor of CANADA OCCIDENTALIS.

QSP - UTI ROGAS and with great appreciation for his skills and
dedication.
MOG: UTI ROGAS
GEM - Uti Rogas, with my particular thanks to Gn. Iulius for being willing to
continue in office. Our western Canadian group is small, but of very high
quality.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS. Gaenus is a fine example of Roman virtue. I believe he ought to be a Senator.
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincial
ATMC - UTI ROGAS.
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with my sincere thanks.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar is appointed as propraetor of CANADA OCCIDENTALIS

2c. Titus Arminius Genialis as propraetor of BRASILIA.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS
GEM - Uti Rogas
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with my sincere thanks.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Titus Arminius Genialis is appointed as propraetor of BRASILIA

2d. Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus as propraetor of PANNONIA.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS
GEM - Uti Rogas. Lentulus is a superb citizen, and an able magistrate.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS. I'm happy that the Pannonia will be in good hands.
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with my sincere thanks.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus is appointed as propraetor of PANNONIA


2e. Titus Iulius Sabinus as propraetor of DACIA.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS
GEM- Uti Rogas. Sabinus is one of our very best. Dacia is fortunate to have him.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS. I support Sabinus, a very skilled magistrates with excellent idea.
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with my sincere thanks.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s. Sab�nus is a dedicated, hardworking, citizen who should be cloned.
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Titus Iulius Sabinusis appointed as propraetor of DACIA.

2f. Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus as proconsul of LACUS MAGNI.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS
GEM - Uti Rogas. My thanks to Gaius Fabius for his continued efforts on behalf of
the Republic.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS Very experienced citizen.
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with my sincere thanks.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s.
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus is appointed as proconsul of LACUS MAGNI


2g. Caius Curius Saturninus as propraetor of THULE.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS
GEM - Uti Rogas. Another first rate citizen. I am pleased he is willing to
continue to serve.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF :VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS Saturninus is one of our most active and intelligent citizen.
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with my sincere thanks.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s.
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Caius Curius Saturninus is appointed as propraetor of THULE.




2h. Quintus Fabius Maximus as proconsul of CALIFORNIA.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: ANTIQUO. We've seen nothing but decline in that province for
five years. It's time for an active governor.
GEM - Antiquo. It is time and past time for California to have another governor. Better the governorship of California be left empty a few months than it be saddled for yet another year with a governor who does nothing and suppresses the efforts of others to do things within his province.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: ANTIQUO
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA: "h"�ABSTAIN
In regards to Senator Maximus and Provincia California, his provided plan looks pretty good to me. He is having the same kind of difficulty in California, that I am seeing in Nova Britannia. We do not always agree, however, I trust that what he says, he will do his best to accomplish. Additionally, I see no other governor candidate for that province, and I strongly disagree that no governor is better than the existing one. �MMA
I have made an error in my vote. I voted to Abstain my vote for Senator Maximus as a governor. I want to change that error to read:
"YES" for Governor Maximus and to
"ABSTAIN" for Governor Marcus Audens.
My thanks to Senator Maximus for alerting me to my error. My apologies for any difficulty that this error has caused.
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS �ANTIQUO
MMPH - ANTIQUO
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: ANTIQUO. We need to stop the decline, and a new governor is part
of the solution.
GFBM: Antiquo
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : ANTIQUO
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: ANTIQVO
ECF: Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC � ABSTAIN
LAF : ANTIQVO - The absence of people of California so long time, a culturally so rich environment, makes me worry about the capacity of the governor. We used to use the W.O. rule - nobody steps down, the sole willing citizen becomes the wining candidate. Well, I think on this case it is not working anymore.
CFBQ: Antiquo
FAC: ANTIQVO California needs an active governor
CSA - I vote against.
MAM: Antiquo.
AMA: Antiquo.
SAS: Abstineo.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Antiqu�
GEC: Uti Rogas

12 Uti Rogas, 2 Abstineo and 19 Antiquo: Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT appointed as proconsul of CALIFORNIA

2i. C. Sempronia Graccha Volentia as propraetor of AMERICA MEDIOCCIDENTALIS SUPERIOR

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS.
GEM: Uti Rogas.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF: VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with gratitude.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s. She has done a good job with the calendar distribution in the US, and with various sodalitates.
The title, however, should be propraetr�x in her case.
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: C. Sempronia Graccha Volentia is appointed as propraetrix of AMERICA MEDIOCCIDENTALIS SUPERIOR

2j. Fl. Galerius Aurelianus as propraetor of AMERICA AUSTRORIENTALIS

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS.
GEM - Uti Rogas, with my thanks to Propraetor Galerius for his active and
enthusiastic service.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF:VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with gratitude.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s.
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Fl. Galerius Aurelianus is appointed as propraetor of AMERICA AUSTRORIENTALIS

2k. Tiberius Galerius Paulinus as proconsul of AMERICA MEDIATLANTICA.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS.
GEM: Uti Rogas, by whatever title, a good governor.
TGP � ABSTINEO
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF: VTI ROGAS. although I think he would have really considered pass to
another citizen, due to the burden of the consulship this year.
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with gratitude.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s, though this is, as one of the honored senatores had noted, a heavy burden in conjunction with the c�nsul�tus.
GEC: Uti Rogas

33 Uti Rogas: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus is appointed as proconsul of AMERICA MEDIATLANTICA

2l. Marcus Minucius Audens as proconsul of NOVA BRITANNIA.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS.
GEM: Uti Rogas, with my thanks for his long years of service.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
I have made an error in my vote. I voted to Abstain my vote for Senator Maximus as a governor. I want to change that error to read:
"YES" for Governor Maximus and to
"ABSTAIN" for Governor Marcus Audens.
My thanks to Senator Maximus for alerting me to my error. My apologies for any difficulty that this error has caused.
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF: VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS He is an example for us as man and as governor
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with gratitude.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s.
GEC: Uti Rogas

32 Uti Rogas and 1 Abstineo: Marcus Minucius Audens is appointed as proconsul of NOVA BRITANNIA.

2m. Lucius Didius Geminus Sceptius as propraetor of HISPANIA.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS.
GEM: Uti Rogas. Lucius Didius continues to serve the Republic and his province
well. Few outside Hispania realize just how much he does.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS - Uti Rogas to all EXCEPT: point 2.h. (California) which I vote Antiquo, and point 2.m (Hispania) which I vote Abstineo. Besides, I'm no longer Didius Geminus, but Minicius. Yahoo messing up...
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: UTI ROGAS to all.
MMA- "a" through "m" except for "h"-- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - VTI ROGAS to all
TOPA: UTI ROGAS to a through g and i through m.
GFBM: Uti Rogas
GPL - Uti Rogas to all.
MBA : UTI ROGAS
DIPI: Uti rogas to all
CCS: Uti rogas to A through G and I through M. Antiquo to H (California). It's time for the Senate to appoint a new person there
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas from A to G and from I to M. Antiquo to H (California). It would be good to find an active propraetor for this provincia.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF: VTI ROGAS
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS I see again great projects for Hispania.
CSA - I abstain.
MAM: Uti Rogas.
AMA: Uti Rogas to all with gratitude.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to appoint all nominated individuals above to govern provinces
ATS: Vt� rog�s, though the gentleman has pointed out that his nomen is now Minicius (as it has been for some time), not the historically-inaccurate and linguistically impossible Didius Geminus. His correct name is thus L. Minicius Sceptius.
GEC: Uti Rogas

31 Uti Rogas and 2 Abstineo: Lucius Minicius Sceptius is appointed as propraetor of HISPANIA



Item III - Senatusconsultum - "De consulibus et proconsulibus"

In keeping with the authority granted to the Senate by Article III, Paragraph 3, of the Constitution, (Please note that this is a change only to their title, and has no impact on their duties, powers, and
functions).
Currently-serving Consuls governing provinces shall be titled Consul.
Former Consuls who are continuing to govern a province after their term as Consul ends shall be titled Proconsul.
Magistrates appointed by the Senate to govern a particular province for the first time shall be titled Praetor.
Praetors who continue to govern a province after their first term of office ends shall be titled Propraetor.

Magistrates appointed by governors to assist in the administration of their province who shares the governor�s Imperium shall be titled Legate

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: ANTIQUO.
GEM: Antiquo. Only the Comitia Centuriata may make a Praetor. Thus I can not
support this proposal.
TGP - VTI ROGAS This simply adds the new title of Italy to the
current SC on titles
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS: Uti Rogas
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: ANTIQUO
MMA -- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Antiquo
Comment: There seems to be a flaw in this in that the Senate should not be empowered to appoint someone to be a praetor. Beyond that, this seemingly endless topic of seeking exactly the "right" title for every position seems to be a great waste of time and energy.
PMS �ANTIQUO
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM � ANTIQVO. Ironic since I pushed for this. But I believe we must reword it better.
TOPA: ANTIQUO. It is dangerous calling governators Praetors without a law or preferably constitutional amendment to separate them from the "real" Praetors.
GFBM: Antiquo. I would prefer the usage of something other than Praetor.
GPL - Antiquo. As has been pointed out, only the people can create a praetor.
MBA : ANTIQUO
DIPI: ANTIQUO. Marinus is right, the senate can not make a praetor, only give propraetorian powers, thus the use of the term "propraetor" during previous years.
CCS: Antiquo
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Antiquo
ATMC - ANTIQUO
LAF: VTI ROGAS - This Senatusconsultum changes nothing, just titles.
CFBQ: Antiquo
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour.
MAM: Abstineo.
AMA: Antiquo.
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Nego I vote not to approve the senatusconsultum now, understanding that the language differentiating praetor and propraetor will be developed for resubmission.
ATS: Antiqu�. As proposed here, the title praetor seems inaccurate and inappropriate.
GEC: Antiquo. I prefer the usage of the available (and historic) terminology rather than than "praetor".

13 Uti Rogas, 1 Abstineo and 19 Antiquo: Senatusconsultum not passed



Item IV - Senatusconsultum - "De Italia"

The attribute "province" is removed from the description of Italy within Nova Roma.

It will be govern as a province under the rules adopted by the Senate but will be called Italia.

The "governor" of Italy shall be called Praefectus Italiae. If a sitting Consul or Praetor resides in Italy and they serve as "governor" on behalf of the Senate of Nova Roma they shall be called Consul or Praetor.

QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS.
GEM: Uti Rogas.
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS: Uti Rogas
CFD: Antiquo The proposal has it�s ancient roots in times later than that of the republic we try to reconstruct. More important for me is that we need a territorial organization adequate to our internet-based micornational character. Italia is de facto a province and should de facto bear the title of a province. A province is governed by a promagistrate, the titles we adjusted above. Some adjustments to our current times and structures are necessary.
PC: UTI ROGAS.
MMA -- NO;

I had originally thought to approve this item, but the arguments against it are, to me, quite telling. This decision of mine, has nothing to do with personalities �MMA
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Antiquo Comment: There appears to be no real reason for this proposal other than that it will make the Italians feel good. If that's a motive, perhaps we should make all citizens everywhere feel good by dropping the term "province" from the titles of all regions of Nova Roma.
PMS -UTI ROGAS
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - ANTIQVO
Italia should be an equal to all provinces. To single her out just because she contains Rome is silly and sets a precedent.
TOPA: UTI ROGAS.
GFBM: Uti Rogas.
GPL- Antiquo. I agree with Senators Australicus, Cincinnatus, and Diocletianus.
MBA : UTI ROGAS. I like the idea of honouring Italia, for they are the home of Rome.
DIPI: Antiquo
CCS: Uti rogas. Many thanks for our Consules for making this change!
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas. This is a great improvement to our credibility.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF: VTI ROGAS, we cannot deny this honour to Italia
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour. It was due time that this old reivindication of our Italian co-citizens be recognized.
MAM: Abstineo.
AMA: Uti Rogas
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to honor Italia in this way.
ATS: Vt� rog�s
GEC: Uti Rogas

26 Uti Rogas, 1 Abstineo and 6 Antiquo: Senatusconsultum passed



Item V - Senatusconsultum - "Senatus Consultum de Regendis Provinciis"

I. The SenatusConsultum of 11 March 2001 is hereby revoked. For all purposes of this text, the English word "governor" replaces the Latin terms "propraetor" or "proconsul". In the absence of the consuls,these instructions should be followed by the magistrate with the highest Imperium available granted by the Republic (such as the praetor, dictator or interrex).
II. At the beginning of their terms of office, but prior to the Ides of February, the consuls are asked to issue an edictum calling for the governors for the upcoming year. The consuls will be responsible for
setting the period during which applications will be taken in accordance with their planning of the Senate's agenda.
III. The term of a governor starts immediately after issuance of the Senate results of the approvals on the Main List. The term of a governor ends with that of a new governor for the province (or the
same, in case of prorogation ) or on the Ides (15th) of March, or whichever happens first. Any change before the term is the responsibility of the Senate.
IV. For provinces with a budget at their disposal, the Senate asks the consuls to choose one of the quaestors to help the governor in making jointly the report of expenses. The consuls shall take geographic and cultural patterns into account for making the assignment.
V. The Senate asks the consuls to not accept candidates that are not allowed by NR law to become governors. If a current governor fails to send the Senate the financial report of the province (if needed) by the time for calling of new governors, the Senate advises the consuls not to accept the name of this citizen for prorogation.

QSP - UTI ROGAS to all v
MOG: UTI ROGAS.
GEM: Uti Rogas.
TGP � Abstain
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS: Uti Rogas
CFD: Abstino.
PC: UTI ROGAS.
MMA -- YES;
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Abstineo
PMS �ABSTAIN
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM - ANTIQVO
While I under stand what this is suppose to say, it�s badly written and needs revision
TOPA: UTI ROGAS.
GFBM: Uti Rogas.
GPL :Uti Rogas
MBA: UTI ROGAS. I like this. It clears the way for more accurate titles.
DIPI: Abstineo
CCS: Uti rogas.
MIP: VTI ROGAS
ECF: Uti rogas
ATMC � ABSTAIN
LAF: VTI ROGAS, it makes things clearer
CFBQ: Uti Rogas
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour
MAM: Abstineo.
AMA: Uti Rogas
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to adopt this senatusconsultum.
ATS: Vt� rog�s, though not without some hesitation.
GEC: Uti Rogas

25 Uti Rogas, 7 Abstineo and 1 Antiquo: Senatusconsultum passed.



Item VI - Senatusconsultum - "De Aquila"

Senatus Consultum on the Aquila Newsletter.

The Senate authorizes the Editor Commentariorum, Ap. Galerius Aurelianus, to solicit subscriptions, in an amount determined by him but not exceeding $20.00USD per subscription for a printed Aquila
Newsletter." Individuals may if the like make donations in addition to taking out a subscription.

He is further authorized to solicit donations to off-set the costs of publishing the Aquila newsletter for the year L. Arminio Ti. Galerio cos. The number of copies, per issue, to be printed shall be
determined by the Editor Commentariorum, with the advice of his staff and advisors, based on the cost of production, delivery and the amount of money collected.

The Senate requires that 2/3 of the total cost of the newsletter be covered by direct subscriptions and / or donations. No more than 1/3 of the total cost will be covered by the Nova Roma treasury.

The Editor Commentariorum, Ap. Galerius Aurelianus, will also publish or cause to be published, a free web version of the Aquila newsletter. He shall do so in a manner determined by him


QSP - UTI ROGAS
MOG: UTI ROGAS. A printed newsletter is desperately needed for our credibility, else were are nothing more than a collection of mailing lists and web sites. We don't need yet another web site; we need a newsletter.
GEM: Uti Rogas, with the caution that the Editor Commentariorum must strive to cover all operating costs with paid subscription fees. The 1/3 amount specified in the text is an upper bound, and not something that he should consider 'money in the bank.'
TGP - VTI ROGAS
JSM: UTI ROGAS
LMS: Abstineo
CFD: Uti Rogas
PC: ANTIQUO. More needs to be known about the financial aspects of this move, and whether we have the volunteers available to do the work of producing, printing and mailing this Aquila.
MMA --YES; I had originally thought to disapprove of this issue because of the mention of allotting NR funding to support it. However, I agree with those who seek a more specific and detailed item signifying NR to the outside world. I believe this newsletter will help in this effort.
LECA - VTI ROGAS
LSA: Uti Rogas
PMS - ANTIQUO I believe we should be doing the audit first before awarding any monies, except for a strict emergency situation. Moreover, I would like to know a figure of how much is being requested of the Senate as opposed to a given percentage of the costs.
MMPH - UTI ROGAS
QFM � VTI ROGAS
TOPA: ANTIQUO. Put in an upper limit as to how much the third that Nova Roma is supposed to cover may be, otherwise I'm in support.
GFBM: Uti Rogas. However, I don't think our publications need take any money from our treasury. I believe they can be self-sufficient.
GPL :Uti Rogas
MBA: UTI ROGAS.
DIPI: Uti rogas. It will be good to see a hard copy of the Eagle again.
CCS: Antiquo.
MIP: ABSTINEO
ECF: Antiquo. A fixed sum would be more preferable.
ATMC - UTI ROGAS
LAF: ABSTINEO, I said once we should not approve anything without a detailed budget. I miss one on this case. Once, the Aquila budget administration was a disaster. So, for approve without doubt, It would be very suitable an detailed budget.
CFBQ: Antiquo
FAC: VTI ROGAS
CSA - I vote in favour
MAM: Abstineo.
AMA: Uti Rogas
SAS: Uti Rogas.
CMM - Vti rogas I vote to adopt this senatusconsultum.
ATS: Abstine�.
GEC: Uti Rogas

22 Uti Rogas, 5 Abstineo and 6 Antiquo: Senatusconsultum passed.

COMMENTS OF SENATORES
Item VII - Contio about 2/3

"Last year, the subject of the 2/3 of the Senate needed to approve a constitutional reform has been touched due to many doubts of interpretation. There was some division of opinions between the
magistrates. The question remained unsolved, and some senatores asked the current consuls to continue the subject.

There is currently two interpretations of the law, both with merits. According to the Historical procedures of Ancient Rome, and obeying the seniority of the conscript fathers, we invite all senatores to discuss the question,on the hope some light can be better brought to the subject. There is no voting, just a refreshment of the question.

One interpretation says the text of the Constitution means "2/3 of the entire Senate" means all citizens entitled to vote in the Senate.

The other means "2/3 of the entire Senate" means all voting senatores , ie, by "Senate" is recognized the senatores present to a voting.

So we invite the senatores to give their opinions during the voting.

We hope the fathers understand everything on the Republic can be accomplished with a powerful agreement, and we together can reach to a reasonable and republican approuch.

QSP - I would rather have a straight vote passed by numbers rather than the 2/3 formula. I think the 2/3 system could be stifling and frustrating, slowing things down; also, more often than not there are
always 5 or 6 senators who do not make the voting and that does not help at all.

MOG - The Constitution is broken. The author never foresaw a Senate with a high absentee rate. Either the Constitution needs to be fixed so that a 2/3rds majority of voting Senators (when a quorum is present) are sufficient, or we're going to have to start tossing people out of the Senate if we ever want to be able to make any changes.

GEM - The text of the Constitution is clear. 2/3 of all the persons enrolled in the Album Senatorium must vote in favor of a Constitutional Amendment for it to pass. I recommend that Censors M. Octavius Gracchus and C. Fabius Buteo Modianus exercise their constitutionally granted authority to remove inactive senators from the Album Senatorium as quickly as possible, in order to preserve the effectiveness of this Senate.

TGP Our constitution has clauses that are at times contradictorily. This is not one of those times. I believe that the only way one can interpret the constitution is to look at its plain language . "2/3 of the entire Senate" means "2/3 of the entire Senate"

JSM - The constitution should be modified only in extreme circumstances. A policy regarding absenteeism of senatores ought to be developed and rigorously applied.

LSM - I support a 2/3 of the voting senators. If there are people who doesn't care about what is under voting at any moment on the organization they belong to, and give no proxy or representation, they can be count as "mind absence" people. So only 2/3 of the people who really care and participate.

CFD: I prefer a historical argumentation. In ancient times many Senators were unable to be present in Senate sessions due to commitments overseas, in wars acting as officers, in diplomatic missions, as provincial magistrates. This means that our ancient forefathers had a Senate which was imho quite never complete. Today a simple network breakdown can cut more than one Senatr off communication, that�s comparable for me.
The 2/3 quorum can in my opinion only be counted from the Senators present at a specific session.

PC: I agree with the Constitution as currently written.

MMA (no vote) -- I do not agree that the Constitution is unclear on this question. It is quite clear to me, and the concern lies in two areas. The first, and most important one, to my thought, is the responsibility of the Senators so appointed. It is a significant honor to be elected to this office or to be appointed by one's peers. It also has a significant responsibility. If any Senator is not concerned about the responsibility he or she should be removed from that position. The second concern is the problem of communication methodology. Yahoo has not in the past proven to be so exact in their support that I should be willing to dismiss a Senator solely on the basis of Yahoo's message delivery record. Two items to consider in this question.

LECA - The Constitution stipulates 2/3 of the ENTIRE Senate must vote to ratify any change to it. It does not say anything other than that, not "of those who vote", not "minus those who abstain", et cetera.
There is only one *Honest* interpretation of the statement, "... such alterations to this Constitution must be ratified by a vote of two-thirds of the entire Senate before they shall take effect...", any less than 2/3's of the entire Senate voting to ratify is not enough to pass an amendment/change.
What should be done? Let the system work for once, BEFORE monkeying around with it.
Why is it that each new administration is in such a rush to make changes?
We've been through this drill many times the past years and I haven't honestly seen any changes that have made Nova Roma better, more complicated, but not better.

LSA - comment: It is my opinion that this provision of the Constitution should remain unaltered and should be understood to mean what it clearly says - that 2/3 of all the members of the Senate must approve a change to the Constitution. Senators not participating for an extended period of time should be removed by the Censors.

PMS - I do not see the ambiguity in current constitutional language itself...For years it has been unquestioned as meaning 2/3 of this entire senate , just as it reads. This 2/3 has shown to be attainable in the past when Senators have voted regularily. I, with other Senators, think it is time to tighten the criteria of participation for Senators to maintain their positions among this august body.

MMPH � No comments

QFM - This is a vote with no division possible. But for informative purposes it is very apparent that 2/3rds of the ENTIRE appointed SENATE must vote to ratify any change to this Constitution. Other wise it would read � THOSE SENATORS PRESENT� in the text.
So to make it official: VTI ROGAS to the interpetation that the vote must pass with 2/3rds of the entire Senate.
Not just those Senators present.

TOPA: UTI ROGAS - as I believe the phrase would have interpreted by the romans and how I believe it should be used. If it cannot be interpreted that way, I am for a constitutional amendment to the same effect.

GFBM: I agree with M. Octavius Gracchus in that there are problems in our constitution. There are also too many senators who don't vote. If someone is a senator and doesn't have the time or interest they need to let the Censores know about it so they can be removed. I think the constitution does indicate 2/3 of the whole senate, but I think this should be changed.

GPL : It seems to me the Constitution is very clear. A 2/3rds vote of the entire Senate is required.

MBA: After reviewing the constitution, I am of the belief that 2/3 of the entire Senate means just that. We, as Senators, need to be responsible and vote. I missed one vote at the beginning of last year and I still feel that I violated a trust that was given to me.

DIPI - (No vote required.) There is no ambiguity in the constitution on this matter. It clearly states votes of 2/3rds of the *entire* senate is required to pass a constitutional amendment, not 2/3rds of those voting.
This has never really been a problem before last year, so perhaps part of the issue was last year's leadership. In the past, if consuls were afraid of not getting enough votes, they would lobby senators privately and in the senate, saying why a vote was important and why a senator's vote was important and needed. They would lead.
As for high absenteeism of late, again it may be an issue of last year's leadership. It may also be due to the cheapening of the senate the year before that, when 11 or 12 people were added (increasing our numbers by about 1/3) to the senate in one year by the censores. That stacking of the senate made it much more difficult to add worthy people to the senate in following years because of the required senator to assidui ratio. It made the title of senator mean less and may have encouraged people to stay away from this chamber more than they would have.

CCS - Uti rogas. Senator Pius has already pointed out same comments I intended to.

MIP: VTI ROGAS

ECF: Uti rogas.

ATMC � No comments

LAF: Since the ancient roman senatores never ever counted missing senatores, I believe the constitution means 2/3 of the voting senatores. Anyway, I urge the Senate to consider even more �draconian� measures to keep citizens on the album Senatorium.

CFBQ - o change he Constitution to only include the voting Senatores in the 2/3 is both historical and practical. Although I encourage the Censores to get rid of Senatores who haven't voted for three times in a row, without asking for leave or having medical reasons.

FAC: No comments

CSA - Any "2/3 formula" will necessarily be historically inaccurate. I'd advocate for getting rid of this modernism altogether.

MAM: Abstineo.

AMA: I agree with the constitution as it is currently written, that 2/3 of all the persons enrolled in the Album Senatorium must vote.

SAS: Any such formula will not be accurate historically.

CMM - For the purpose of constitutional amendment only, the quorum should in my opinion remain 2/3 of the entire senate, not only of senators casting votes in session. To amend the constitution should be a rarity, and therefore, provisions aren't needed to facilitate it. For all other business, a simple majority of votes cast, discarding "abstineo", should determine the outcome. In this way, the senate can move forward while preserving the structure of Nova Roma's institutions.

ATS: For what it is worth, I cannot see how we can fail to interpret this as meaning two-thirds of all members considered part of the senate. Clearly, however, if paralysis is a problem because too few of the enrolled members vote, some pruning of inactive members should be done. Perhaps there could be sen�t�r�s �merit� who would not count toward the total.

GEC: I believe the lex Constitutiva should be left as it is.

Valete

M�CVRIATIVS�COMPLVTENSIS
TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
NOVA ROMA

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48879 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
SALVE !

I will help with the wiki page.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

Bob Johnson <jbshr1pwa@...> wrote:
C Marcius Crispus Equitie Marine omnibusque SPD

Thank you for your reply.

It would be good if enough of us brits could get together to get the website at http://www.britannia-provincia.co.uk working, with at least some information in it.

Any helpers?

Vale et valete omnes
Caius Marcius Crispus

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
Salve Gai Marci, et salvete omnes,

C Marcius Crispus <jbshr1pwa@...> writes:

> Can anyone please supply more information about this as regards the
> Province, both then and since this time?

Britannia has had an on-again, off-again situation in the last six years.
It's two most active citizens for a while were A. Apollonius Cordus, who I
imagine will eventually respond to your question, and G. Livia who built a
beautiful website and became governor and then a senator. Unfortunately for
all, graduate school seems to have eaten both of them. They have not been
especially active since the Nova Roma conventus at Hadrian's Wall during the
summer of 2006.

We do have a few other britons who poke their noses in here from time to time.
Perhaps they're all still recovering from their experiences at Hadrian's
Wall?

Anyhow Crispe, your countrymen are represented in Nova Roma. They're just
being quiet right now.

Vale, et valete,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48880 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Salve Sabine!

Many thanks for your k9ind offer.

I shall keep all these offers until I am sure that I will have no objections to trying to put something together. I shall be most grateful to you all.

Vale optime!

iulius sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
SALVE !

I will help with the wiki page.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

Bob Johnson <jbshr1pwa@...> wrote:
C Marcius Crispus Equitie Marine omnibusque SPD

Thank you for your reply.

It would be good if enough of us brits could get together to get the website at http://www.britannia-provincia.co.uk working, with at least some information in it.

Any helpers?

Vale et valete omnes
Caius Marcius Crispus

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
Salve Gai Marci, et salvete omnes,

C Marcius Crispus <jbshr1pwa@...> writes:

> Can anyone please supply more information about this as regards the
> Province, both then and since this time?

Britannia has had an on-again, off-again situation in the last six years.
It's two most active citizens for a while were A. Apollonius Cordus, who I
imagine will eventually respond to your question, and G. Livia who built a
beautiful website and became governor and then a senator. Unfortunately for
all, graduate school seems to have eaten both of them. They have not been
especially active since the Nova Roma conventus at Hadrian's Wall during the
summer of 2006.

We do have a few other britons who poke their noses in here from time to time.
Perhaps they're all still recovering from their experiences at Hadrian's
Wall?

Anyhow Crispe, your countrymen are represented in Nova Roma. They're just
being quiet right now.

Vale, et valete,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius

---------------------------------
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48881 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: De Propraetura Californiana
L. Iunius Bassus omnibus aliis civibus Californianis Novae Romae s.d.

As you may have noticed, our Conscript Fathers, in their wisdom, have decided that the time
has come for a change of leadership for our provincia. If you are a Nova Roman citizen
residing in California, Nevada, or Hawaii, and you think you have what it takes to breath life
into this very important province of ours, please consider putting your name forward for the
Propraetura. We need a dedicated person with innovative ideas for citizen recruitment and
retention, and the creation of a vivid provincial community.

Also, if you have not yet joined the CaliforniaNovaRoma Yahoo! Group, please do so. A new
leader alone will not solve the problems of this province. We need an active and involved
citizenry--the very fabric of any Republic.

Valete bene!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48882 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Salve Gaius Marcius Crispus

"try to bring we citizens together as a group and work to
restore the Province."

Province of Britannica is one our best and most active provinces.
It hosted the Conventus at Hadrians wall last summer and is home to
some of our best and brightest citizens.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Consul



----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Johnson<mailto:jbshr1pwa@...>
To: Nova Roma<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 7:35 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] The cries of the Britons


C Marcius Crispus omnibus SPD

I read with interest the history of events in 2001, which included a reference to the entire Province of Britannica breaking with Nova Roma.

Can anyone please supply more information about this as regards the Province, both then and since this time?

As a new citizen, one of the first things I did was to look for the relevant page, expecting to find information about my own Province, merely to discover absolutely nothing. I am sure other Britons will have been similarly disappointed.

There are surely a number of citizens, including some newly-admitted ones, who are Britons, and I wonder what can be done to try to bring we citizens together as a group and work to restore the Province. Could anyone out there suggest what we should do, and help us make a start? Perhaps Nova Roma could help its british citizens play more of a role as a Province of the Res Publica.

Any information or suggestions would be most gratefully received.

And would any other Brits be interested in getting a team together to do whatever is necessary to reconstitute the Province? If so, please lets get together.


Valete optime!

Gaius Marcius Crispus

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48883 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Agricola Crispo sal.

Well, nobody would mind if you get a lot of stubby pages started in
the wiki. Take a look at http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Italia
or http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Dacia_%28Nova_Roma%29 for
examples. There are templates in use there to ease the job. You could
even dig around in the Wayback Machine and try to pull up some of the
expired pages for background content.

Optime vale!



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Bob Johnson <jbshr1pwa@...> wrote:
>
> Crispus Marcella sal
>
> Thanks very much for the offer.
>
> Obviously I don't want to start anything until I have some
backing, and chief of all I don't want to tread on any toes of those
who may hold office in this Province (do they?) but help wiould be
welcome.
>
> Optime vale!
>
> Annia Minucia Marcella <annia@...> wrote:
> Salve,
>
> Well I'm not a brit, but I can help out with a website if you'd
like. I currently host about half a dozen websites including my gens
website here: http://minucia.ciarin.com/
>
> Vale,
>
> Annia Minucia Marcella
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bob Johnson
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 8:57 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] The cries of the Britons
>
> C Marcius Crispus Equitie Marine omnibusque SPD
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> It would be good if enough of us brits could get together to get the
website at http://www.britannia-provincia.co.uk working, with at least
some information in it.
>
> Any helpers?
>
> Vale et valete omnes
> Caius Marcius Crispus
>
> Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
> Salve Gai Marci, et salvete omnes,
>
> C Marcius Crispus <jbshr1pwa@...> writes:
>
> > Can anyone please supply more information about this as regards the
> > Province, both then and since this time?
>
> Britannia has had an on-again, off-again situation in the last six
years.
> It's two most active citizens for a while were A. Apollonius Cordus,
who I
> imagine will eventually respond to your question, and G. Livia who
built a
> beautiful website and became governor and then a senator.
Unfortunately for
> all, graduate school seems to have eaten both of them. They have not
been
> especially active since the Nova Roma conventus at Hadrian's Wall
during the
> summer of 2006.
>
> We do have a few other britons who poke their noses in here from
time to time.
> Perhaps they're all still recovering from their experiences at Hadrian's
> Wall?
>
> Anyhow Crispe, your countrymen are represented in Nova Roma. They're
just
> being quiet right now.
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> CN.EQVIT.MARINVS
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48884 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: A Great Site On Roman Britain
Salvete omnes,

Here is a great comprehensive site all about Roman Britain I got thanks
to Robert on the Imperial Rome 2 list. Over 1500 pages of good stuff
from what I can see:


http://www.roman-britain.org/


Enjoy and bookmark!

QSP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48885 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2007-02-01
Subject: Re: A Great Site On Roman Britain
SALVETE !

Good link. I saw there, two years ago, references about the Cohors I Aelia Dacorum
and we discussed in the provincial list about that.
If the novi romani from Dacia are interested the page is at this address :
http://www.roman-britain.org/military/coh1dac.htm

VALETE,
IVL SABINVS

"Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:
Salvete omnes,

Here is a great comprehensive site all about Roman Britain I got thanks
to Robert on the Imperial Rome 2 list. Over 1500 pages of good stuff
from what I can see:

http://www.roman-britain.org/

Enjoy and bookmark!

QSP







"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------
Looking for earth-friendly autos?
Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48886 From: M·C·C· Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: NAMES CORRECTIONS IN THE APPOINTMENT OF INTERPRETES AND GOVERNORS
Salvete

In the call to the Senate made by Consul Faustus to appoint interpretes and governors there are two mistakes: the person who has been appointed interpreter of French is not named Titus Octavius Avitus but Tiberius Octavius Avitus and the person appointed propraetor of Hispania is not named Lucius Didius Geminus Sceptius but Lucius Minicius Sceptius. This mistake does not affect to the result of the votings and the appointments.


Valete

M�CVRIATIVS�COMPLVTENSIS
TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
SCRIBA CENSORIS GFBM
NOVA ROMA

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48887 From: M·C·C· Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: ELECTIONS FOR TRIBUNUS PLEBIS AND AEDILIS PLEBEIUS
Marcus Curiatius Complutensis Tribunus Plebis onmes civibus S.P.D.

At 23.59 CET of 31 Jan (before Midnight at Rome, 6:00 PM EDT, or 3:00 PM PDT) we have close the time to receive the declarations of candidacy for the offices of Tribunus Plebis (1 position available) ans Aedillis Plebeius (1 position available).

At this time we have received only two declarations of candidacy for the office of Tribunus Plebis and and no declaration of candidacy for the position of Aedilis Plebeius.

The candidates for the office of Tribunus Plebis are:

- Marca Hortensia Maior
- Flavius Galerius Aurelianus


The cista will be open in Feb. 18 at 00.00 CET, the first day Comitialis after Jan 31st, (a.d. XII Kal. Mar) and will be closed in Feb 28th, (pr. Kal. Mar.).

Valete bene

M�CVRIATIVS�COMPLVTENSIS
TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
NOVA ROMA



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48888 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Marcio Crispo Cn. Equitio Marino quiritibus, sociis,
> peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
> Salve Gai Marci, et salvete omnes,
>
> C Marcius Crispus <jbshr1pwa@...
> <mailto:jbshr1pwa%40btinternet.com> > writes:
>
>> > Can anyone please supply more information about this as regards the
>> > Province, both then and since this time?
>
> Britannia has had an on-again, off-again situation in the last six years.
> It's two most active citizens for a while were A. Apollonius Cordus, who I
> imagine will eventually respond to your question, and G. Livia who built a
> beautiful website and became governor and then a senator. Unfortunately for
> all, graduate school seems to have eaten both of them. They have not been
> especially active since the Nova Roma conventus at Hadrian's Wall during the
> summer of 2006.
>
> ATS: C. Livia is studying for her PhD in linguistics, and A. Apollonius
> Cordus is in a second, one-year intensive law course. Both are minimally
> involved in NR at present.
>
> We do have a few other britons who poke their noses in here from time to time.
>
> ATS: There¹s Aureliana...and Avitus, who, however, is occupied with other
> matters, such as teaching Latin.
>
> Perhaps they're all still recovering from their experiences at Hadrian's
> Wall?
>
> ATS: I don¹t theenk so. We all had a WONDERFUL time. Aureliana and
> Cordus did an excellent job of planning the Conventus, and even Nature
> cooperated by providing nice, sunny weather. The bad part was that Astur and
> I got treated to terror alert central at Heathrow (or wherever his point of
> departure was). Everyone else seems to have gotten out ahead of that.
>
> I think we should point out to Crispus that not all British citizens left
> Nova Roma at that time; some simply chose to do so, and formed another
> organization. At least one prominent member has returned to us.
>
> Anyhow Crispe, your countrymen are represented in Nova Roma. They're just
> being quiet right now.
>
> ATS: Yes, that is true. Even last year, Cordus was able to pop in more
> often than he seems to be able to do this year. Give it time.
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>
Valéte,

A. Tullia Scholastica



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48889 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: assistants for plebeian aedile!
Salvete omnes,

As a Plebeian Aedile this year, I'm asking citizens to volunteer to
work in my cohors. There are several openings for assistants, and the
final division of duties depends on the staff itself, but to give
some idea, here is what I need:

-graphic designer for web
-illustrator, a person who can draw either by hand or with
illustration software
-Flash-wizard, a person who can realise projects using Macromedia
Flash software
-copywriter, a person who can produce English texts for Ludi and website
-html-person, for building and upkeeping of the website
-researcher, a person who can do historical research about the ludi

One person might of course be able to fit in into several of those
competence-areas, and once I have had some answers from interested
citizens (or non-citizens), the final division of the duties for the
team is set.

If you yourself don't fall into any of those categories above, but
would nevertheless to be part of the team, write to me and let's see
if there is a job for you in my cohors! Or if you know someone who
might be interested of these kinds of work, let him/her know about my
call for assistants and ask him/her to contact me.

Valete,

C. Curius Saturninus

Propraetor Provinciae Thules
Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org
gsm: +358-50-3315279
fax: +358-9-8754751





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48890 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Gaius Marcius Crispus T Galerio Paulino Omnibusque sal

My problem is that it doesn't seem very active or even visible at present as far as I have seen. And this has been disappointing.

There is no website for the Province, I would have hoped to have been welcomed as a new member of the Province, asked how I could contribute, encouraged to get involved, be aware of who were members and where they are located, find a Provincial forum, be encouraged when the lists open to pay taxes, and so on.

I now, for the first time and thanks to Scholastica, have a name, but it would have been so much easier if the names and contacts were all available on a Provincial website.

I shall wait and see.

Vale et valete

Gaius Marcius Crispus

Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
Salve Gaius Marcius Crispus

"try to bring we citizens together as a group and work to
restore the Province."

Province of Britannica is one our best and most active provinces.
It hosted the Conventus at Hadrians wall last summer and is home to
some of our best and brightest citizens.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Consul

----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Johnson<mailto:jbshr1pwa@...>
To: Nova Roma<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 7:35 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] The cries of the Britons

C Marcius Crispus omnibus SPD

I read with interest the history of events in 2001, which included a reference to the entire Province of Britannica breaking with Nova Roma.

Can anyone please supply more information about this as regards the Province, both then and since this time?

As a new citizen, one of the first things I did was to look for the relevant page, expecting to find information about my own Province, merely to discover absolutely nothing. I am sure other Britons will have been similarly disappointed.

There are surely a number of citizens, including some newly-admitted ones, who are Britons, and I wonder what can be done to try to bring we citizens together as a group and work to restore the Province. Could anyone out there suggest what we should do, and help us make a start? Perhaps Nova Roma could help its british citizens play more of a role as a Province of the Res Publica.

Any information or suggestions would be most gratefully received.

And would any other Brits be interested in getting a team together to do whatever is necessary to reconstitute the Province? If so, please lets get together.

Valete optime!

Gaius Marcius Crispus

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48891 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Gaius Marcius Crispus A. Tullia Scholastica Omnibusque S.P.D.

Salve Scholastica et salvete omnes

I am grateful for your information and thank you for taking the time to reply.

I do appreciate how little time can be available to students. I was once one myself (BA(Hons) Lampeter) forty years ago. I would suggest that, if time is a problem, the answer is delegation, delegation, delegation.

I am simply saying that we do need to welcome and involve new citizens within the Province, and that without any way of knowing who are citizens and who does what, we miss the opportunity to make steady and continued progress.

I am sure my fellow Brits would be more involved if we were asked to help in some way. Then we would indeed appear to the rest of Nova Roma to be an active and progressive Province.

Vale optime et valete omnes.

C Marcius Crispus .


"A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote:
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Marcio Crispo Cn. Equitio Marino quiritibus, sociis,
> peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
> Salve Gai Marci, et salvete omnes,
>
> C Marcius Crispus <jbshr1pwa@...
> <mailto:jbshr1pwa%40btinternet.com> > writes:
>
>> > Can anyone please supply more information about this as regards the
>> > Province, both then and since this time?
>
> Britannia has had an on-again, off-again situation in the last six years.
> It's two most active citizens for a while were A. Apollonius Cordus, who I
> imagine will eventually respond to your question, and G. Livia who built a
> beautiful website and became governor and then a senator. Unfortunately for
> all, graduate school seems to have eaten both of them. They have not been
> especially active since the Nova Roma conventus at Hadrian's Wall during the
> summer of 2006.
>
> ATS: C. Livia is studying for her PhD in linguistics, and A. Apollonius
> Cordus is in a second, one-year intensive law course. Both are minimally
> involved in NR at present.
>
> We do have a few other britons who poke their noses in here from time to time.
>
> ATS: There¹s Aureliana...and Avitus, who, however, is occupied with other
> matters, such as teaching Latin.
>
> Perhaps they're all still recovering from their experiences at Hadrian's
> Wall?
>
> ATS: I don¹t theenk so. We all had a WONDERFUL time. Aureliana and
> Cordus did an excellent job of planning the Conventus, and even Nature
> cooperated by providing nice, sunny weather. The bad part was that Astur and
> I got treated to terror alert central at Heathrow (or wherever his point of
> departure was). Everyone else seems to have gotten out ahead of that.
>
> I think we should point out to Crispus that not all British citizens left
> Nova Roma at that time; some simply chose to do so, and formed another
> organization. At least one prominent member has returned to us.
>
> Anyhow Crispe, your countrymen are represented in Nova Roma. They're just
> being quiet right now.
>
> ATS: Yes, that is true. Even last year, Cordus was able to pop in more
> often than he seems to be able to do this year. Give it time.
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>
Valéte,

A. Tullia Scholastica

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48892 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Crispus Agricola sal

That is very helpful. Thank you so much.

Vale optime!

C Marcius Crispus

"M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@...> wrote:
Agricola Crispo sal.

Well, nobody would mind if you get a lot of stubby pages started in
the wiki. Take a look at http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Italia
or http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Dacia_%28Nova_Roma%29 for
examples. There are templates in use there to ease the job. You could
even dig around in the Wayback Machine and try to pull up some of the
expired pages for background content.

Optime vale!

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Bob Johnson <jbshr1pwa@...> wrote:
>
> Crispus Marcella sal
>
> Thanks very much for the offer.
>
> Obviously I don't want to start anything until I have some
backing, and chief of all I don't want to tread on any toes of those
who may hold office in this Province (do they?) but help wiould be
welcome.
>
> Optime vale!
>
> Annia Minucia Marcella <annia@...> wrote:
> Salve,
>
> Well I'm not a brit, but I can help out with a website if you'd
like. I currently host about half a dozen websites including my gens
website here: http://minucia.ciarin.com/
>
> Vale,
>
> Annia Minucia Marcella
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bob Johnson
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 8:57 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] The cries of the Britons
>
> C Marcius Crispus Equitie Marine omnibusque SPD
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> It would be good if enough of us brits could get together to get the
website at http://www.britannia-provincia.co.uk working, with at least
some information in it.
>
> Any helpers?
>
> Vale et valete omnes
> Caius Marcius Crispus
>
> Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
> Salve Gai Marci, et salvete omnes,
>
> C Marcius Crispus <jbshr1pwa@...> writes:
>
> > Can anyone please supply more information about this as regards the
> > Province, both then and since this time?
>
> Britannia has had an on-again, off-again situation in the last six
years.
> It's two most active citizens for a while were A. Apollonius Cordus,
who I
> imagine will eventually respond to your question, and G. Livia who
built a
> beautiful website and became governor and then a senator.
Unfortunately for
> all, graduate school seems to have eaten both of them. They have not
been
> especially active since the Nova Roma conventus at Hadrian's Wall
during the
> summer of 2006.
>
> We do have a few other britons who poke their noses in here from
time to time.
> Perhaps they're all still recovering from their experiences at Hadrian's
> Wall?
>
> Anyhow Crispe, your countrymen are represented in Nova Roma. They're
just
> being quiet right now.
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> CN.EQVIT.MARINVS
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48893 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: a.d. IV Non. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem IV Nonas Februarius; haec dies nefastus aterque est.


"After the death of Numa Pompilius the senate, being once more in full
control of the commonwealth, resolved to abide by the same form of
government, and as the people did not adopt any contrary opinion, they
appointed some of the older senators to govern as interreges for a
definite number of days. These men, pursuant to the unanimous desire
of the people, chose as king Tullus Hostilius, whose descent was as
follows. From Medullia, a city which had been built by the Albans and
made a Roman colony by Romulus after he had taken it by capitulation,
a man of distinguished birth and great fortune, named Hostilius, had
removed to Rome and married a woman of the Sabine race, the daughter
of Hersilius, the same woman who had advised her country-women to go
as envoys to their fathers on behalf of their husbands at the time
when the Sabines were making war against the Romans, and was regarded
as the person chiefly responsible for the alliance then concluded by
the leaders of the two nations. This man, after taking part with
Romulus in many wars and performing mighty deeds in the battles with
the Sabines, died, leaving an only son, a young child at the time, and
was buried by the kings in the principal part of the Forum and
honoured with a monument and an inscription testifying to his valour.
His only son, having come to manhood and married a woman of
distinction, had by her Tullius Hostilius, a man of action, the same
who was now chosen king by a vote passed by the citizens concerning
him according to the laws; and the decision of the people was
confirmed by favourable omens from Heaven. The year in which he
assumed the sovereignty was the second of the twenty-seventh Olympiad,
the one in which Eurybates, an Athenian, won the prize in the
foot-race, Leostratus being archon at Athens. Tullus, immediately
upon his accession, gained the hearts of all the labouring class and
of the needy among the populace by performing an act of the most
splendid kind. It was this: The kings before him had possessed much
fertile land, especially reserved for them, from the revenues of which
they not only offered sacrifices to the gods, but also had abundant
provision for their private needs. This land Romulus had acquired in
war by dispossessing the former owners, and when he died childless,
Numa Pompilius, his successor, had enjoyed its use; it was no longer
the property of the state, but the inherited possession of the
successive kings. Tullus now permitted this land to be divided
equally among such of the Romans as had no allotment, declaring that
his own patrimony was sufficient both for the sacrifices and for his
personal expenditures. By this act of humanity he relieved the poor
among the citizens by freeing them from the necessity of labouring as
serfs on the estates of others. And, to the end that none might lack a
habitation either, he included within the city wall the hill called
the Caelian, where those Romans who were unprovided with dwellings
were allotted a sufficient amount of ground and built houses; and he
himself had his residence in this quarter. These, then, are the
memorable actions reported of this king so far as regards his civil
administration." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus, "Roman Antiquities" 3.1


Today is celebrated as Groundhog Day in the U.S. Punxsutawney Phil, a
groundhog, is the official arbiter of when winter will end; he
annually makes an appearance to forecast whether there are six more
weeks of winter or if spring is just around the corner. For more
information, see this website:

http://www.groundhog.org


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48894 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Regalia of Maxentius
Agricola Omnibus sal.

A photo at last of some of what was dug up recently on the Palatine.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0%2C%2C13509-2575075%2C00.html

Optime valete!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48895 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2792
Salvete,

I'm afraid I have to take a critical stand in this issue. I think
this very policy is the reason why there has been diminishing
interest from our citizens to participate and be active. It's like
pouring a bucket of cold water on new enthusiastic and unsure
prospective citizen, that we ask him/her to take a test.

Should this kind of system kept, I'd suggest having it modified in a
way that there isn't such negative message in the first place given
to them. For example to create an atmosphere that encourages to learn
rather than says that one must take a test a full citizens. Or
somehow make the citizenship to be appreaciated as a long term goal,
something that everyone approaches in his own speed and eventually
reaches when is ready. A kind of gradual transition to citizenship
instead of once-and-for-all test, as every normal person is afraid of
tests or at least not comfortable about them in the outset.

I'm sensitive on the workload of censores and other magistrates that
those who might not apply citizenship with 100% commitment cause, but
I would like the process to be developed into somehow friendlier and
more welcoming. I'm sure there are several ways how that can be done
while keeping the magistrate workload reasonable.

Valete,



On 30.1.2007, at 15:36, Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com wrote:

> 2. Some numbers to contemplate
> Posted by: "Gnaeus Equitius Marinus" gawne@...
> equitius_marinus
> Date: Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:07 am ((PST))
>
> Salvete Quirites,
>
> Back at the beginning of 2005 we instituted a new policy of
> requiring a 90 day
> probationary period and a written citizenship test in order to cut
> down on the
> number of casual citizenships. Looking at the numbers for the
> first year of
> the effort, from 1 Jan 2005 to 1 Jan 2006, we see this:
>
> 1299 Applications
> 237 'Active' status citizens who joined NR during the year 2005.
> 51 Assidui (tax paying) citizens among those 237 active
>
> I can't provide similar numbers for 2006 yet, because we won't be
> able to
> close the books on 2006 until March.
>
> Looking at those numbers, the conclusions I draw are:
>
> -- The probationary period works as intended. Over 1000 casual
> applicants
> never become full citizens. Roughly 4 of 5 applicants didn't
> complete the
> process to become full citizens.
>
> -- The overall probability of an active citizen becoming a tax
> payer didn't
> change appreciably under the new system. Nova Roma currently has
> 1044 active
> citizens, of whom about 250 paid taxes last year.
>
> Valete,
>
> CN•EQVIT•MARINVS

C. Curius Saturninus

Propraetor Provinciae Thules
Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org
gsm: +358-50-3315279
fax: +358-9-8754751
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48896 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
SALVETE !

A few photos from the Vasto meeting in Italy :
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/vasto.htm

My special thanks to:
- Pomerium - for the excellent organization of the event, especially
to Franciscus Apulus Caesar.
- Iulius Perusianus - who come there with a day before the official
meeting to join us at Montecarlo Hotel.
- Aurelius Vindex - for his dedication
- Quirinus Sulla - for photos.
- Italian Novi Romani - for their friendship.
- Vasto and Chieti municipality's representatives and museums
guides - for their involvement to promote the Italian historical and
cultural heritage.
- my fellows Novi Romani from Dacia – for participation.

I was impressed by the Capestrano Warrior statue in Chieti and Ara
Pacis in Rome.
You can find inside the page, links to visited areas and places.

I was impressed by the Capestrano Warrior statue in Chieti and Ara
Pacis in Rome.
You can find inside the page, links to visited areas and places.

VALETE,
IVL SABINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48897 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Salve amice,

Wow, am I impressed! Thank you for sharing the photos with us. Not
only are the settings and scenery beautiful but it is nice to see the
faces of our citizens as well! You all kook just great and I feel
sorry I wasn't there for the gathering. Still, this should be an
inspiration to all of us as to what can be done on local levels.

Regards,

QSP






--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Iulius Sabinus"
<iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
>
> SALVETE !
>
> A few photos from the Vasto meeting in Italy :
> http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/vasto.htm
>
> My special thanks to:
> - Pomerium - for the excellent organization of the event,
especially
> to Franciscus Apulus Caesar.
> - Iulius Perusianus - who come there with a day before the official
> meeting to join us at Montecarlo Hotel.
> - Aurelius Vindex - for his dedication
> - Quirinus Sulla - for photos.
> - Italian Novi Romani - for their friendship.
> - Vasto and Chieti municipality's representatives and museums
> guides - for their involvement to promote the Italian historical
and
> cultural heritage.
> - my fellows Novi Romani from Dacia – for participation.
>
> I was impressed by the Capestrano Warrior statue in Chieti and Ara
> Pacis in Rome.
> You can find inside the page, links to visited areas and places.
>
> I was impressed by the Capestrano Warrior statue in Chieti and Ara
> Pacis in Rome.
> You can find inside the page, links to visited areas and places.
>
> VALETE,
> IVL SABINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48898 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
LOL,

Sorry, I was up all night - should say you all look just great!

QSP



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
(Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:
>
> Salve amice,
>
> Wow, am I impressed! Thank you for sharing the photos with us. Not
> only are the settings and scenery beautiful but it is nice to see
the
> faces of our citizens as well! You all kook just great and I feel
> sorry I wasn't there for the gathering. Still, this should be an
> inspiration to all of us as to what can be done on local levels.
>
> Regards,
>
> QSP
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Iulius Sabinus"
> <iulius_sabinus@> wrote:
> >
> > SALVETE !
> >
> > A few photos from the Vasto meeting in Italy :
> > http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/vasto.htm
> >
> > My special thanks to:
> > - Pomerium - for the excellent organization of the event,
> especially
> > to Franciscus Apulus Caesar.
> > - Iulius Perusianus - who come there with a day before the
official
> > meeting to join us at Montecarlo Hotel.
> > - Aurelius Vindex - for his dedication
> > - Quirinus Sulla - for photos.
> > - Italian Novi Romani - for their friendship.
> > - Vasto and Chieti municipality's representatives and museums
> > guides - for their involvement to promote the Italian historical
> and
> > cultural heritage.
> > - my fellows Novi Romani from Dacia – for participation.
> >
> > I was impressed by the Capestrano Warrior statue in Chieti and
Ara
> > Pacis in Rome.
> > You can find inside the page, links to visited areas and places.
> >
> > I was impressed by the Capestrano Warrior statue in Chieti and
Ara
> > Pacis in Rome.
> > You can find inside the page, links to visited areas and places.
> >
> > VALETE,
> > IVL SABINVS
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48899 From: Gaius Aurelius Vindex Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Rif: [Nova-Roma] Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Ave IUL SABINUS,

Thank you very much.
I hope to see you and the Dacicus Nova Romani Citizens
in May.

Optime Vale
Gaius Aurelius Vindex




-------Messaggio originale-------

Da: Titus Iulius Sabinus
Data: 02/02/07 13:30:25
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] Conventus Vastensis - photos.

SALVETE !

A few photos from the Vasto meeting in Italy :
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/vasto.htm

My special thanks to:
- Pomerium - for the excellent organization of the event, especially
to Franciscus Apulus Caesar.
- Iulius Perusianus - who come there with a day before the official
meeting to join us at Montecarlo Hotel.
- Aurelius Vindex - for his dedication
- Quirinus Sulla - for photos.
- Italian Novi Romani - for their friendship.
- Vasto and Chieti municipality's representatives and museums
guides - for their involvement to promote the Italian historical and
cultural heritage.
- my fellows Novi Romani from Dacia – for participation.

I was impressed by the Capestrano Warrior statue in Chieti and Ara
Pacis in Rome.
You can find inside the page, links to visited areas and places.

I was impressed by the Capestrano Warrior statue in Chieti and Ara
Pacis in Rome.
You can find inside the page, links to visited areas and places.

VALETE,
IVL SABINVS





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48900 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2792
Agricola Saturnino sal.

I think that the "New Roman" group is working pretty well to help new
people have a more positive experience.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newroman/

optime vale!



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C. Curius Saturninus"
<c.curius@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete,
>
> I'm afraid I have to take a critical stand in this issue. I think
> this very policy is the reason why there has been diminishing
> interest from our citizens to participate and be active. It's like
> pouring a bucket of cold water on new enthusiastic and unsure
> prospective citizen, that we ask him/her to take a test.
>
> Should this kind of system kept, I'd suggest having it modified in a
> way that there isn't such negative message in the first place given
> to them. For example to create an atmosphere that encourages to learn
> rather than says that one must take a test a full citizens. Or
> somehow make the citizenship to be appreaciated as a long term goal,
> something that everyone approaches in his own speed and eventually
> reaches when is ready. A kind of gradual transition to citizenship
> instead of once-and-for-all test, as every normal person is afraid of
> tests or at least not comfortable about them in the outset.
>
> I'm sensitive on the workload of censores and other magistrates that
> those who might not apply citizenship with 100% commitment cause, but
> I would like the process to be developed into somehow friendlier and
> more welcoming. I'm sure there are several ways how that can be done
> while keeping the magistrate workload reasonable.
>
> Valete,
>
>
>
> On 30.1.2007, at 15:36, Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com wrote:
>
> > 2. Some numbers to contemplate
> > Posted by: "Gnaeus Equitius Marinus" gawne@...
> > equitius_marinus
> > Date: Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:07 am ((PST))
> >
> > Salvete Quirites,
> >
> > Back at the beginning of 2005 we instituted a new policy of
> > requiring a 90 day
> > probationary period and a written citizenship test in order to cut
> > down on the
> > number of casual citizenships. Looking at the numbers for the
> > first year of
> > the effort, from 1 Jan 2005 to 1 Jan 2006, we see this:
> >
> > 1299 Applications
> > 237 'Active' status citizens who joined NR during the year 2005.
> > 51 Assidui (tax paying) citizens among those 237 active
> >
> > I can't provide similar numbers for 2006 yet, because we won't be
> > able to
> > close the books on 2006 until March.
> >
> > Looking at those numbers, the conclusions I draw are:
> >
> > -- The probationary period works as intended. Over 1000 casual
> > applicants
> > never become full citizens. Roughly 4 of 5 applicants didn't
> > complete the
> > process to become full citizens.
> >
> > -- The overall probability of an active citizen becoming a tax
> > payer didn't
> > change appreciably under the new system. Nova Roma currently has
> > 1044 active
> > citizens, of whom about 250 paid taxes last year.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>
> C. Curius Saturninus
>
> Propraetor Provinciae Thules
> Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
>
> e-mail: c.curius@...
> www.academiathules.org
> gsm: +358-50-3315279
> fax: +358-9-8754751
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48901 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Agricola Sabino sal.

It is good to hear that the Ara Pacis is open again. It was all fenced
in by construction when I was there and nobody could say when it would
finish.

Optime vale!


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Iulius Sabinus"
<iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
>
> SALVETE !
>
> A few photos from the Vasto meeting in Italy :
> http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/vasto.htm
>
> My special thanks to:
> - Pomerium - for the excellent organization of the event, especially
> to Franciscus Apulus Caesar.
> - Iulius Perusianus - who come there with a day before the official
> meeting to join us at Montecarlo Hotel.
> - Aurelius Vindex - for his dedication
> - Quirinus Sulla - for photos.
> - Italian Novi Romani - for their friendship.
> - Vasto and Chieti municipality's representatives and museums
> guides - for their involvement to promote the Italian historical and
> cultural heritage.
> - my fellows Novi Romani from Dacia – for participation.
>
> I was impressed by the Capestrano Warrior statue in Chieti and Ara
> Pacis in Rome.
> You can find inside the page, links to visited areas and places.
>
> I was impressed by the Capestrano Warrior statue in Chieti and Ara
> Pacis in Rome.
> You can find inside the page, links to visited areas and places.
>
> VALETE,
> IVL SABINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48902 From: Andreas Lachmann Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: roman music
SALVETE,
my name is Andreas Lachmann and I'm a roman re-enactor and living historian
from Brisbane,Australia.
I've only joined Nova Roma recently as a probationary member ,and this is my
first post on this forum.
Last week somebody,the name escapes me I'm sorry to say,posted some
information about roman music by SYNAVLIA.As a result I ended up downloading
both their cd's (at i-Tunes )just in time for our CASTORI,POLLVCI AD FORVM
feast last weekend.
While we all enjoyed the music and the way it enhanced our night,we were
left wondering on what research the music is based.Can anybody help in that
regard?It would be much appreciated.
Last but not least ,I would like to take this opportunity to thank CATO for
his marvelous daily contributions.
VALETE,D.ARM.BRVTVS

_________________________________________________________________
Advertisement: Meet Sexy Singles Today @ Lavalife - Click here
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Flavalife9%2Eninemsn%2Ecom%2Eau%2Fclickthru%2Fclickthru%2Eact%3Fid%3Dninemsn%26context%3Dan99%26locale%3Den%5FAU%26a%3D23769&_t=754951090&_r=endtext_lavalife_dec_meet&_m=EXT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48903 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: the citizenship test
Salve Cai Curi,

"C. Curius Saturninus" <c.curius@...> writes:

> Salvete,
>
> I'm afraid I have to take a critical stand in this issue. I think
> this very policy is the reason why there has been diminishing
> interest from our citizens to participate and be active.

I think there's no evidence to support this. The test is quite basic,
consisting of 12 multiple choice questions chosen from a bank of 100.

Why in the world do you think it diminishes interest? We have provisional
citizens getting interested all the time. Come over to the newroman mailing
list and look.

Vale,


CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48904 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: the citizenship test
Salvete

I agree with Gn. Marino. The test and porbationary period are really a
bare minimum intended to screen out people who have no real interest
and to insure those who do become cives have a basic understanding of
things Roman and Nova Roman.

I believe it has been a great step forward.

Valete,

G. Popillius Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48905 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Salve Sabine,

Titus Iulius Sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> writes:

> SALVETE !
>
> A few photos from the Vasto meeting in Italy :
> http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/vasto.htm

Those are great! I wish I could have been there with you all.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48906 From: D. Aemilus Severus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: FW: [Nova-Roma] Re: the citizenship test
Salvete,

Don't be nervous about the test. I wrote it earlier in the month, and
though a little nervous about what it may entail, I tell you with
confidence, don't be nervous. This step towards citizenship is important,
precisely for the reason G. Popillius Laenas stipulates, and should be
something to look forward to, as a challenge. It is a simplistic way to
demonstrate your knowledge of Roman history and society. Accept the
challenge and move on to bigger and better things afterwards. I look
forward to seeing you announce your full citizenship.

Di vos incolumes custodiant,

D�AEMILIVS�SEVERVS



> >Salvete
> >
> >I agree with Gn. Marino. The test and porbationary period are really a
> >bare minimum intended to screen out people who have no real interest
> >and to insure those who do become cives have a basic understanding of
> >things Roman and Nova Roman.
> >
> >I believe it has been a great step forward.
> >
> >Valete,
> >
> >G. Popillius Laenas
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48907 From: Inigo Fernandez Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Salve!

Thanks for share the pics and let this NR citizen remember his trip to the
"Eternal City". I think the time to make some saves and buy a trip fom
Mexico to Rome in june or september has come.

Di te incolumem custodiant
CAIVS IVLIUS ADVENTOR


On 2/2/07, Titus Iulius Sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
>
> SALVETE !
>
> A few photos from the Vasto meeting in Italy :
> http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/vasto.htm
>
>
>
> .
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48908 From: D. Aemilus Severus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: FW: [Nova-Roma] Re: the citizenship test
O.K., I am an idiot. Read the replies but not the original post, except the
parts included in the responses. I must apologize to C. Curius Saturninus.
Lesson learned.

D�AEMILIVS�SEVERVS


On 2/2/07, D. Aemilus Severus <daemilivssevervs@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete,
>
> Don't be nervous about the test. I wrote it earlier in the month, and
> though a little nervous about what it may entail, I tell you with
> confidence, don't be nervous. This step towards citizenship is important,
> precisely for the reason G. Popillius Laenas stipulates, and should be
> something to look forward to, as a challenge. It is a simplistic way to
> demonstrate your knowledge of Roman history and society. Accept the
> challenge and move on to bigger and better things afterwards. I look
> forward to seeing you announce your full citizenship.
>
> Di vos incolumes custodiant,
>
> D�AEMILIVS�SEVERVS
>
>
>
> > >Salvete
> > >
> > >I agree with Gn. Marino. The test and porbationary period are really a
> > >bare minimum intended to screen out people who have no real interest
> > >and to insure those who do become cives have a basic understanding of
> > >things Roman and Nova Roman.
> > >
> > >I believe it has been a great step forward.
> > >
> > >Valete,
> > >
> > >G. Popillius Laenas
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48909 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Rif: [Nova-Roma] Conventus Vastensis - photos.
SALVE OPTIME AURELI VINDEX !

There is any doubt about that. We wait you !

We, the NR Dacians, thank you for your ospitality.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS



Gaius Aurelius Vindex <g_a_vindex@...> wrote:
Ave IUL SABINUS,

Thank you very much.
I hope to see you and the Dacicus Nova Romani Citizens
in May.

Optime Vale
Gaius Aurelius Vindex




-------Messaggio originale-------

Da: Titus Iulius Sabinus
Data: 02/02/07 13:30:25
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] Conventus Vastensis - photos.

SALVETE !

A few photos from the Vasto meeting in Italy :
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/vasto.htm

My special thanks to:
- Pomerium - for the excellent organization of the event, especially
to Franciscus Apulus Caesar.
- Iulius Perusianus - who come there with a day before the official
meeting to join us at Montecarlo Hotel.
- Aurelius Vindex - for his dedication
- Quirinus Sulla - for photos.
- Italian Novi Romani - for their friendship.
- Vasto and Chieti municipality's representatives and museums
guides - for their involvement to promote the Italian historical and
cultural heritage.
- my fellows Novi Romani from Dacia – for participation.

I was impressed by the Capestrano Warrior statue in Chieti and Ara
Pacis in Rome.
You can find inside the page, links to visited areas and places.

I was impressed by the Capestrano Warrior statue in Chieti and Ara
Pacis in Rome.
You can find inside the page, links to visited areas and places.

VALETE,
IVL SABINVS





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48910 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
SALVE AMICE !

I'm sorry because I don't have photos. My camera was to my wife and she wasn't with me there.

The Augustus Mausoleum is still in restoration. I saw how the restaurateurs work to it.
The exposition from basement is open, too. I was delighted to see there the models with the explanation of the Augustus family members and an interesting explanation of the floral motives from bas-reliefs. I can add the Tellus bas-relief and scenes with sacrifices.
BTW, the Curia was open for the visitors, too. In 2005 when we took a photo in front of it, wasnÂ’t.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

"M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@...> wrote:
Agricola Sabino sal.

It is good to hear that the Ara Pacis is open again. It was all fenced
in by construction when I was there and nobody could say when it would
finish.

Optime vale!

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Iulius Sabinus"
<iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
>
> SALVETE !
>
> A few photos from the Vasto meeting in Italy :
> http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/vasto.htm
>
> My special thanks to:
> - Pomerium - for the excellent organization of the event, especially
> to Franciscus Apulus Caesar.
> - Iulius Perusianus - who come there with a day before the official
> meeting to join us at Montecarlo Hotel.
> - Aurelius Vindex - for his dedication
> - Quirinus Sulla - for photos.
> - Italian Novi Romani - for their friendship.
> - Vasto and Chieti municipality's representatives and museums
> guides - for their involvement to promote the Italian historical and
> cultural heritage.
> - my fellows Novi Romani from Dacia – for participation.
>
> I was impressed by the Capestrano Warrior statue in Chieti and Ara
> Pacis in Rome.
> You can find inside the page, links to visited areas and places.
>
> I was impressed by the Capestrano Warrior statue in Chieti and Ara
> Pacis in Rome.
> You can find inside the page, links to visited areas and places.
>
> VALETE,
> IVL SABINVS
>







"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------
Have a burning question? Go to Yahoo! Answers and get answers from real people who know.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48911 From: Appius Iulius Priscus Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: roman music
Salve, Andreas

I have an official CD of Synaulia that brings an extensive text in german, which unfortunately I cannot understand.

Vale
Appius Iulius Priscus

Andreas Lachmann <pagermanicvs@...> wrote:
SALVETE,
my name is Andreas Lachmann and I'm a roman re-enactor and living historian
from Brisbane,Australia.
I've only joined Nova Roma recently as a probationary member ,and this is my
first post on this forum.
Last week somebody,the name escapes me I'm sorry to say,posted some
information about roman music by SYNAVLIA.As a result I ended up downloading
both their cd's (at i-Tunes )just in time for our CASTORI,POLLVCI AD FORVM
feast last weekend.
While we all enjoyed the music and the way it enhanced our night,we were
left wondering on what research the music is based.Can anybody help in that
regard?It would be much appreciated.
Last but not least ,I would like to take this opportunity to thank CATO for
his marvelous daily contributions.
VALETE,D.ARM.BRVTVS

__________________________________________________________
Advertisement: Meet Sexy Singles Today @ Lavalife - Click here
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Flavalife9%2Eninemsn%2Ecom%2Eau%2Fclickthru%2Fclickthru%2Eact%3Fid%3Dninemsn%26context%3Dan99%26locale%3Den%5FAU%26a%3D23769&_t=754951090&_r=endtext_lavalife_dec_meet&_m=EXT






---------------------------------
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
with theYahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48912 From: Andreas Lachmann Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: roman music
SALVE PRISCE,
while I'm living in Australia as a citizen of that wonderful country,I was
in fact born and raised in Hamburg,Germany.Thus german is my native
tongue.If you please kindly scan the german text for me,I'll translate it
for the benefit of you and my fellow romans down here.
Thanks for you kind response.
VALE D.ARM.BRVTVS



>Salve, Andreas
>
> I have an official CD of Synaulia that brings an extensive text in
>german, which unfortunately I cannot understand.
>
> Vale
> Appius Iulius Priscus
>

>
>__________________________________________________________
>Advertisement: Meet Sexy Singles Today @ Lavalife - Click here
>http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Flavalife9%2Eninemsn%2Ecom%2Eau%2Fclickthru%2Fclickthru%2Eact%3Fid%3Dninemsn%26context%3Dan99%26locale%3Den%5FAU%26a%3D23769&_t=754951090&_r=endtext_lavalife_dec_meet&_m=EXT
>
>
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
> with theYahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

_________________________________________________________________
Advertisement: Meet Sexy Singles Today @ Lavalife - Click here
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Flavalife9%2Eninemsn%2Ecom%2Eau%2Fclickthru%2Fclickthru%2Eact%3Fid%3Dninemsn%26context%3Dan99%26locale%3Den%5FAU%26a%3D23769&_t=754951090&_r=endtext_lavalife_dec_meet&_m=EXT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48913 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: FW: [Nova-Roma] Re: the citizenship test
Salve D. Aemili Severe,

In my books, nobody who comes here with an interest and willing to
learn about Rome, Nova Roma et al is an idiot. More the intellectual
type I would certainly say. Welcome to Nova Roma!

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus

Senator




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "D. Aemilus Severus"
<daemilivssevervs@...> wrote:
>
> O.K., I am an idiot. Read the replies but not the original post,
except the
> parts included in the responses. I must apologize to C. Curius
Saturninus.
> Lesson learned.
>
> D•AEMILIVS•SEVERVS
>
>
> On 2/2/07, D. Aemilus Severus <daemilivssevervs@...> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete,
> >
> > Don't be nervous about the test. I wrote it earlier in the
month, and
> > though a little nervous about what it may entail, I tell you with
> > confidence, don't be nervous. This step towards citizenship is
important,
> > precisely for the reason G. Popillius Laenas stipulates, and
should be
> > something to look forward to, as a challenge. It is a simplistic
way to
> > demonstrate your knowledge of Roman history and society. Accept
the
> > challenge and move on to bigger and better things afterwards. I
look
> > forward to seeing you announce your full citizenship.
> >
> > Di vos incolumes custodiant,
> >
> > D•AEMILIVS•SEVERVS
> >
> >
> >
> > > >Salvete
> > > >
> > > >I agree with Gn. Marino. The test and porbationary period are
really a
> > > >bare minimum intended to screen out people who have no real
interest
> > > >and to insure those who do become cives have a basic
understanding of
> > > >things Roman and Nova Roman.
> > > >
> > > >I believe it has been a great step forward.
> > > >
> > > >Valete,
> > > >
> > > >G. Popillius Laenas
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48914 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Agricola Sabino Caesarique sal.

I made a stub here:
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Vasto_-_2007_Weekend_in_Regio_IV_-_Samnium

Could someone do a little write up and post a picture or two?

Maybe we could get one or two pictures added to the Main Page picture
rotation as well?

optime valete!


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Iulius Sabinus"
<iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
>
> SALVETE !
>
> A few photos from the Vasto meeting in Italy :
> http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/vasto.htm
>
> My special thanks to:
> - Pomerium - for the excellent organization of the event, especially
> to Franciscus Apulus Caesar.
> - Iulius Perusianus - who come there with a day before the official
> meeting to join us at Montecarlo Hotel.
> - Aurelius Vindex - for his dedication
> - Quirinus Sulla - for photos.
> - Italian Novi Romani - for their friendship.
> - Vasto and Chieti municipality's representatives and museums
> guides - for their involvement to promote the Italian historical and
> cultural heritage.
> - my fellows Novi Romani from Dacia – for participation.
>
> I was impressed by the Capestrano Warrior statue in Chieti and Ara
> Pacis in Rome.
> You can find inside the page, links to visited areas and places.
>
> I was impressed by the Capestrano Warrior statue in Chieti and Ara
> Pacis in Rome.
> You can find inside the page, links to visited areas and places.
>
> VALETE,
> IVL SABINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48915 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Agricola Adventori sal.

Or how about the Conventus in Hispania in August? If I took the trip
all the way from Mexico I might add a side trip to Rome after. I bet I
wouldn't be the only one, either.

Optime vale!


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Inigo Fernandez" <inigus2002@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve!
>
> Thanks for share the pics and let this NR citizen remember his trip
to the
> "Eternal City". I think the time to make some saves and buy a trip fom
> Mexico to Rome in june or september has come.
>
> Di te incolumem custodiant
> CAIVS IVLIUS ADVENTOR
>
>
> On 2/2/07, Titus Iulius Sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
> >
> > SALVETE !
> >
> > A few photos from the Vasto meeting in Italy :
> > http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/vasto.htm
> >
> >
> >
> > .
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48916 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Marcio Crispo quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
>
> Gaius Marcius Crispus A. Tullia Scholastica Omnibusque S.P.D.
>
> Salve Scholastica et salvete omnes
>
> ATS: You are welcome!
>
> I am grateful for your information and thank you for taking the time to
> reply.
>
> ATS: That¹s one of the things we do here, though the New Roman list is
> specifically set up for that purpose.
>
> I do appreciate how little time can be available to students. I was once one
> myself (BA(Hons) Lampeter) forty years ago. I would suggest that, if time is a
> problem, the answer is delegation, delegation, delegation.
>
> ATS: Propraetrix C. Livia is also an honors graduate; she got first class
> honors (not sure just what this means...), and went directly to her Ph.D.
> Cordus had more time even last year when he was in a different intensive law
> course; this year he barely peeks in at all. It is our loss that he does not,
> for he is one of our finest, and brightest, citizens.
>
> Delegation requires willing delegatees...and if these are not forthcoming,
> one has to do things oneself...or not at all.
>
> I am simply saying that we do need to welcome and involve new citizens within
> the Province, and that without any way of knowing who are citizens and who
> does what, we miss the opportunity to make steady and continued progress.
>
> I am sure my fellow Brits would be more involved if we were asked to help in
> some way. Then we would indeed appear to the rest of Nova Roma to be an active
> and progressive Province.
>
> ATS: Are you on the Britannia provincia e-mail list? I am, and I live
> several thousand miles away across this body of salt water... Have you checked
> the main website for the list of citizens of Britannia Provincia?
>
> Unfortunately, not everyone can find the time (or energy) to be active in any
> organization. Our senior, world-class Latinist, Avitus, lives in London, but
> is overburdened with other work and otherwise disinclined to participate in
> the non-academic elements of NR life. I know of another British citizen who
> has health problems, another who has family health problems, another whose
> work takes him abroad often...
>
> And, once again, kudos is [yes, kudos is a singular Greek noun] owed to
> the Conventus team for a wonderful time touring Hadrian¹s Wall and a large
> selection of museums in and around the various sites we visited. We needed
> more time in those museums, however...
>
> Vale optime et valete omnes.
>
> Et tu et vos omnes!
>
> C Marcius Crispus .
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
>
>
> "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@... <mailto:fororom%40localnet.com>
> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > A. Tullia Scholastica C. Marcio Crispo Cn. Equitio Marino quiritibus,
>> sociis,
>> > peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>> >
>> > Salve Gai Marci, et salvete omnes,
>> >
>> > C Marcius Crispus <jbshr1pwa@...
>> <mailto:jbshr1pwa%40btinternet.com>
>> > <mailto:jbshr1pwa%40btinternet.com> > writes:
>> >
>>>> >> > Can anyone please supply more information about this as regards the
>>>> >> > Province, both then and since this time?
>> >
>> > Britannia has had an on-again, off-again situation in the last six years.
>> > It's two most active citizens for a while were A. Apollonius Cordus, who I
>> > imagine will eventually respond to your question, and G. Livia who built a
>> > beautiful website and became governor and then a senator. Unfortunately for
>> > all, graduate school seems to have eaten both of them. They have not been
>> > especially active since the Nova Roma conventus at Hadrian's Wall during >>
the
>> > summer of 2006.
>> >
>> > ATS: C. Livia is studying for her PhD in linguistics, and A. Apollonius
>> > Cordus is in a second, one-year intensive law course. Both are minimally
>> > involved in NR at present.
>> >
>> > We do have a few other britons who poke their noses in here from time to
>> time.
>> >
>> > ATS: There¹s Aureliana...and Avitus, who, however, is occupied with other
>> > matters, such as teaching Latin.
>> >
>> > Perhaps they're all still recovering from their experiences at Hadrian's
>> > Wall?
>> >
>> > ATS: I don¹t theenk so. We all had a WONDERFUL time. Aureliana and
>> > Cordus did an excellent job of planning the Conventus, and even Nature
>> > cooperated by providing nice, sunny weather. The bad part was that Astur >>
and
>> > I got treated to terror alert central at Heathrow (or wherever his point of
>> > departure was). Everyone else seems to have gotten out ahead of that.
>> >
>> > I think we should point out to Crispus that not all British citizens left
>> > Nova Roma at that time; some simply chose to do so, and formed another
>> > organization. At least one prominent member has returned to us.
>> >
>> > Anyhow Crispe, your countrymen are represented in Nova Roma. They're just
>> > being quiet right now.
>> >
>> > ATS: Yes, that is true. Even last year, Cordus was able to pop in more
>> > often than he seems to be able to do this year. Give it time.
>> >
>> > Vale, et valete,
>> >
>> > CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>> >
> Valéte,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48917 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2792
A. Tullia Scholastica C. Curio Saturnino quiritibus s.p.d.

> Salvete,
>
> I'm afraid I have to take a critical stand in this issue. I think
> this very policy is the reason why there has been diminishing
> interest from our citizens to participate and be active. It's like
> pouring a bucket of cold water on new enthusiastic and unsure
> prospective citizen, that we ask him/her to take a test.

ATS: The citizenship test is a simple, open-book multiple-choice quiz
(not long enough to really be called a test) which demonstrates the
seriousness of the applicant. In the past, we had people leaving after a
couple of months...even after voting for someone whose identity was unknown
to them. Personally, I don't think that either of these is a good
situation.

Moreover, some of the questions on the citizenship tests deal with the
likes of middle-school level knowledge of Roman numerals and whether, say,
one had ever heard of the Punic Wars. Now, I think that anyone here should
be able to demonstrate SOME such knowledge of these matters. We are not
asking for essays on any topic whatsoever, or anything terribly abstruse.

>
> Should this kind of system kept, I'd suggest having it modified in a
> way that there isn't such negative message in the first place given
> to them. For example to create an atmosphere that encourages to learn
> rather than says that one must take a test a full citizens. Or
> somehow make the citizenship to be appreaciated as a long term goal,
> something that everyone approaches in his own speed and eventually
> reaches when is ready. A kind of gradual transition to citizenship
> instead of once-and-for-all test, as every normal person is afraid of
> tests or at least not comfortable about them in the outset.

ATS: We already do that. They have three months, and when the scribae
send the notices that the tirocinium is almost over and it is time for the
test, the tirones can request an extension. Not every normal person is
afraid of taking tests, and this one is so simple that no one should be
afraid of it.

Perhaps Senator Marinus could furnish some numbers on the situation
pre-citizenship test; how many left before three months, etc.

I would also point out that we get several applications from minors as
young as 12 or 13 despite the instructions which specify age 18, and we get
facetious ones from those who want to be silly. Many of those we reject are
either silly or do not provide correct or full information, such as that
applicant Perry Perry lives on 1 Perry Street in Perrysburg, with a
telephone number of (123) 456-7890.
>
> I'm sensitive on the workload of censores and other magistrates that
> those who might not apply citizenship with 100% commitment cause, but
> I would like the process to be developed into somehow friendlier and
> more welcoming. I'm sure there are several ways how that can be done
> while keeping the magistrate workload reasonable.

ATS: Well, I think that we are quite friendly and welcoming. The
workload in the officina approbationum, however, is daunting.
>
> Valete,

Vale, et valete,

A. Tullia Scholastica
Scriba Censoris
>
>
> On 30.1.2007, at 15:36, Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com wrote:
>
>> 2. Some numbers to contemplate
>> Posted by: "Gnaeus Equitius Marinus" gawne@...
>> equitius_marinus
>> Date: Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:07 am ((PST))
>>
>> Salvete Quirites,
>>
>> Back at the beginning of 2005 we instituted a new policy of
>> requiring a 90 day
>> probationary period and a written citizenship test in order to cut
>> down on the
>> number of casual citizenships. Looking at the numbers for the
>> first year of
>> the effort, from 1 Jan 2005 to 1 Jan 2006, we see this:
>>
>> 1299 Applications
>> 237 'Active' status citizens who joined NR during the year 2005.
>> 51 Assidui (tax paying) citizens among those 237 active
>>
>> I can't provide similar numbers for 2006 yet, because we won't be
>> able to
>> close the books on 2006 until March.
>>
>> Looking at those numbers, the conclusions I draw are:
>>
>> -- The probationary period works as intended. Over 1000 casual
>> applicants
>> never become full citizens. Roughly 4 of 5 applicants didn't
>> complete the
>> process to become full citizens.
>>
>> -- The overall probability of an active citizen becoming a tax
>> payer didn't
>> change appreciably under the new system. Nova Roma currently has
>> 1044 active
>> citizens, of whom about 250 paid taxes last year.
>>
>> Valete,
>>
>> CN€EQVIT€MARINVS
>
> C. Curius Saturninus
>
> Propraetor Provinciae Thules
> Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
>
> e-mail: c.curius@...
> www.academiathules.org
> gsm: +358-50-3315279
> fax: +358-9-8754751
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48918 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-02
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
> A. Tullia Scholastica iterum C. Marcio Crispo quiritibus, sociis,
> peregrinisque omnibus S.P.D.
>
>
>
> Gaius Marcius Crispus T Galerio Paulino Omnibusque sal
>
> My problem is that it doesn't seem very active or even visible at present as
> far as I have seen. And this has been disappointing.
>
> ATS: Well, they are in a quiet phase. One does not expect Britons to
> jump up and down and scream a lot...though when I was there Parliament was
> apparently out of session. (I walked by Parliament House, and it did seem
> quiet...).
>
> There is no website for the Province, I would have hoped to have been
> welcomed as a new member of the Province, asked how I could contribute,
> encouraged to get involved, be aware of who were members and where they are
> located, find a Provincial forum, be encouraged when the lists open to pay
> taxes, and so on.
>
> ATS: You should be able to find a list of provincial citizens on the main
> website. The taxation edictum comes out from the central government, and
> should appear later this month; our webmaster has a new server, and is
> building a new tool for tax payments. He, too, is a student, so it will take
> time. There is a provincial mailing list, moderated by Cordus, who, as noted
> earlier, is extremely busy. If I am not mistaken, too, this is examination
> time in Britain, so both Propraetrix Livia and Cordus will be even busier than
> usual. Welcoming messages are usually sent by a live person, who may be busy.
> I welcome those who join the sodalities of which I am a head, but have gotten
> behind with that, too, as the classes I teach and the extremely time-consuming
> procedure of loading the lessons onto the website amid considerable
> difficulties with the server itself take precedence now.
>
> I now, for the first time and thanks to Scholastica, have a name, but it
> would have been so much easier if the names and contacts were all available on
> a Provincial website.
>
> ATS: Senator Marinus provided you with a couple of names and I added a
> couple more. If need be, I can add to that privately. As for a website,
> unfortunately not all provinces have a cybernaut who can manage these thing.
>
> I shall wait and see.
>
> ATS: Good. Patience is a virtue...
>
> Vale et valete
>
> Gaius Marcius Crispus
>
> Vale et valete iterum,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica,
> Praetrix
>
> Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@... <mailto:spqr753%40msn.com> > wrote:
> Salve Gaius Marcius Crispus
>
> "try to bring we citizens together as a group and work to
> restore the Province."
>
> Province of Britannica is one our best and most active provinces.
> It hosted the Conventus at Hadrians wall last summer and is home to
> some of our best and brightest citizens.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Consul
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bob Johnson<mailto:jbshr1pwa@...
> <mailto:jbshr1pwa%40btinternet.com> <mailto:jbshr1pwa@... > >
> To: Nova Roma<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com > >
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 7:35 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] The cries of the Britons
>
> C Marcius Crispus omnibus SPD
>
> I read with interest the history of events in 2001, which included a reference
> to the entire Province of Britannica breaking with Nova Roma.
>
> Can anyone please supply more information about this as regards the Province,
> both then and since this time?
>
> As a new citizen, one of the first things I did was to look for the relevant
> page, expecting to find information about my own Province, merely to discover
> absolutely nothing. I am sure other Britons will have been similarly
> disappointed.
>
> There are surely a number of citizens, including some newly-admitted ones, who
> are Britons, and I wonder what can be done to try to bring we citizens
> together as a group and work to restore the Province. Could anyone out there
> suggest what we should do, and help us make a start? Perhaps Nova Roma could
> help its british citizens play more of a role as a Province of the Res
> Publica.
>
> Any information or suggestions would be most gratefully received.
>
> And would any other Brits be interested in getting a team together to do
> whatever is necessary to reconstitute the Province? If so, please lets get
> together.
>
> Valete optime!
>
> Gaius Marcius Crispus




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48919 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Praetorian Reminder
A. Tullia Scholastica Praetríx quirítibus, sociís, peregrínísque bonae
voluntátis S.P.D.

A little reminder: please snip irrelevant material from your posts when
replying as it can clog people¹s inboxes. Moreover, some of the advertising
which has appeared of late is inappropriate for this or any open list, and
should be removed. If your ISP contributes to the delinquency of minors, or
anyone else, please call this to their attention. We do not welcome such
material here. Thirdly, some e-mail programs seem to list the full e-mail
address of the person whose posts are being answered. This exposes that
person to spam and other unwanted communications, and should therefore be
removed. Please delete the domain name, and preferably the entire address,
of the person whose posts are being answered. We do have spammers here, and
have had to ban two or three of them already this year.

Thank you.

Valete.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48920 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Gaius Marcius Crispus A Tullia Scholastica, Cn Equitio Marino,T Galerio Paulino, Omnibusque S.P.D.

"A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote: > ATS: You should be able to find a list of provincial citizens on the main website.

>>>Well, I couldn't find one.

>ATS: The taxation edictum comes out from the central government, and
should appear later this month; our webmaster has a new server, and is
building a new tool for tax payments.

>>>Yes, I eagerly await the opportunity to pay. (Please note that this comment should not be taken to apply to the British Chancellor of the Exchequer, though!)

>ATS: There is a provincial mailing list, moderated by Cordus, who, as noted
earlier, is extremely busy.

>>>Thank you for advising me of this. I was not aware of it, or would otherwise have not burdened the main list with my posts. Do you have a link that will take me to this, please?

>ATS: Senator Marinus provided you with a couple of names

>>>Indeed he did, and others have been most helpful also. I have emailed the top name on those provided to me. I thank Marinus and all those who have replied to me, with most valuable help and advice.


> Vale et valete omnes!
>
> Gaius Marcius Crispus
Less lonely Brit
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48921 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: a.d. III Non. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem III Nonas Februarius; haec dies nefastus est.


"Many military exploits are related of him, but the greatest are those
which I shall now narrate, beginning with the war against the Albans.
The man responsible for the quarrel between the two cities and the
severing of their bond of kinship was an Alban named Cluilius, who had
been honoured with the chief magistracy; this man, vexed at the
prosperity of the Romans and unable to contain his envy, and being by
nature headstrong and somewhat inclined to madness, resolved to
involve the cities in war with each other. But not seeing how he
could persuade the Albans to permit him to lead an army against the
Romans without just and urgent reasons, he contrived a plan of the
following sort: he permitted the poorest and boldest of the Albans to
pillage the fields of the Romans, promising them immunity, and so
caused many to overrun the neighbouring territory in a series of
plundering raids, as they would now be pursuing without danger gains
from which they would never desist even under the constraint of fear.
In doing this he was following a very natural line of reasoning, as
the event bore witness. For he assumed that the Romans would not
submit to being plundered but would rush to arms, and he would thus
have an opportunity of accusing them to his people as the aggressors
in the war; and he also believed that the majority of the Albans,
envying the prosperity of their colony, would gladly listen to these
false accusations and would begin war against the Romans. And that is
just what happened. For when the worst elements of each city fell to
robbing and plundering each other and at last a Roman army made an
incursion into the territory of the Albans and killed or took prisoner
many of the bandits, Cluilius assembled the people and inveighed
against the Romans at great length, showed them many who were wounded,
produced the relations of those who had been seized or slain, and at
the same time added other circumstances of his own invention;
whereupon it was voted on his motion to send an embassy first of all
to demand satisfaction for what had happened, and then, if the Romans
refused it, to begin war against them." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus,
Roman Antiquities 3.2



"Trembling with fear, Arion said: `I don't plead for life,
But let me take up my lyre and play a little.'
They granted it, laughing at the delay. He took the wreath
That might have graced your tresses, Phoebus:
Put on his robe, twice-stained with Tyrian purple:
And, plucked by his thumb, the strings gave out their music,
Such a melody as the swan's mournful measures,
When the cruel shaft has transfixed its brow.
At once, he plunged, fully clothed into the waves:
The water, leaping, splashed the sky-blue stern.
Then (beyond belief) they say a dolphin
Yielded its back to the unaccustomed weight.
Sitting there, Arion gripped the lyre, and paid his fare
In song, soothing the ocean waves with his singing.
The gods see good deeds: Jupiter took the dolphin
And ordered its constellation to contain nine stars." - Ovid, Fasti
II: 3 February

"Then was there heard a most celestial sound
Of dainty music which did next ensue,
And, on the floating waters as enthroned,
Arion with his harp unto him drew
The ears and hearts of all that goodly crew;
Even when as yet the dolphin which him bore
Through the Aegean Seas from pirates' view,
Stood still, by him astonished at his love,
And all the raging seas for joy forgot to roar." - Edmund Spenser

Arion was a musician from the court of King Periander of Corinth;
sources indicate that the two may have also been lovers. Against
Periander's wishes, Arion decided to enter a musical contest in
Sicily. He won, and was returning home by ship with his prize, when
the sailors on the ship decided that they could put his winnings to
better use than he could. Afraid of the wrath of Periander, however,
they were reluctant to actually kill him; instead, they ordered him to
jump off the ship in the middle of the ocean. His last request was to
play his lyre before he leaped to a watery grave, and the sailors
allowed it.

Arion's playing was the most beautiful music ever heard on earth, in
heaven, or under the earth; it was so beautiful that it drew a school
of dolphins to the side of the ship, and they leapt and played in the
ship's wake. Upon finishing, Arion threw himself overboard --- only
to be picked up by a dolphin and carried, on its back, to safety. He
made it back to Corinth and Periander, the sailors' wickedness was
exposed (they were banished forever), and the dolphin was rewarded by
being placed among the celestial bodies by Iuppiter to mark its
kindness forever.

"Arion the Immortal" is also a character from DC Comics, but has
little or no relation to the Arion of the Greek story, as far as I know.


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Ovid, Edmund Spenser
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48922 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Salve Gaius Marcius Crispus!

I have seen about your loneness, but here should be at least six or
seven citizen that were rather active.

Although I am living in Provincia Thule in Regio Suecica I am a
member of their provincial list, the last message was sent there the
7th of November 2006 after a rather active discussion about "BBC's
Caesar and a debate".

I was present at the European Conventus at Hadrian's wall and there
were several representatives of the Provincia there to administer the
Conventus. I think You should be able to get in touch by using their
private e-mails for ex.

Please take a look at this address:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Britannia-Provincia/join



>Gaius Marcius Crispus A Tullia Scholastica, Cn Equitio Marino,T
>Galerio Paulino, Omnibusque S.P.D.
>
>"A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote: >
>ATS: You should be able to find a list of provincial citizens on the
>main website.
>
> >>>Well, I couldn't find one.
>
> >ATS: The taxation edictum comes out from the central government, and
>should appear later this month; our webmaster has a new server, and is
>building a new tool for tax payments.
>
> >>>Yes, I eagerly await the opportunity to pay. (Please note that
>this comment should not be taken to apply to the British Chancellor
>of the Exchequer, though!)
>
> >ATS: There is a provincial mailing list, moderated by Cordus, who, as noted
> earlier, is extremely busy.
>
> >>>Thank you for advising me of this. I was not aware of it, or
>would otherwise have not burdened the main list with my posts. Do
>you have a link that will take me to this, please?
>
> >ATS: Senator Marinus provided you with a couple of names
>
> >>>Indeed he did, and others have been most helpful also. I have
>emailed the top name on those provided to me. I thank Marinus and
>all those who have replied to me, with most valuable help and advice.
>
>
> > Vale et valete omnes!
>>
> > Gaius Marcius Crispus
> Less lonely Brit
>>
>>
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Senator, Censorius et Consularis
Accensus LAF, Scribae Cebsoris GFBM
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48923 From: Bob Johnson Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
Salve Consule Quintilliane

Excellent, thank you so much for the link to the Britannica list.

Vale Optime!

Gaius Marcius Crispus




Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus <christer.edling@...> wrote:
>: Salve Gaius Marcius Crispus!


Please take a look at this address:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Britannia-Provincia/join




>Messages in this topic (19) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Members | Calendar


Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

Recent Activity

10
New Members

Visit Your Group
Give Back
Yahoo! for Good
Get inspired
by a good cause.

Y! Toolbar
Get it Free!
easy 1-click access
to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups
Start a group
in 3 easy steps.
Connect with others.



.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48924 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

Thanks to all of you who replied to C. Crispus to assure him that there are still a few Britons alive and kicking! We are indeed, although we kick less often than we used to, and mostly behind the scenes these days.

I've replied to Crispus privately about the current position in the province and the ways in which his help could be useful. In particular I hope that we can get something onto the wiki while the main website is down.

I'd also like to take this moment to apologize to those who have been unable to access the provincial website. I must confess that I haven't looked at it for some time, and so I didn't realize it wasn't working. I'll talk to people and see what I can do to get it working again.

If there are any new Britons reading this who haven't made themselves known to me or one another, I encourage them all to join the yahoo e-mail list britannia-provincia@yahoogroups.com and to introduce themselves there.




___________________________________________________________
What kind of emailer are you? Find out today - get a free analysis of your email personality. Take the quiz at the Yahoo! Mail Championship.
http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://mail.yahoo.net/uk
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48925 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: the citizenship test
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

I'd just like to share a couple of thoughts about this.

I have no statistical or even anecdotal information about whether the new system of provisional citizenship and testing discourages people who would otherwise go on to become useful and productive citizens. No doubt it discourages some people, as it is intended to. Some may say that those people are exactly the sort of people whom we ought to discourage: if they can't be bothered to wait three months and do a very simple open-book test, would they ever have contributed anything worthwhile to the republic? Others may say that those people include some who would otherwise have gone on to make valuable contributions to the community, and that no one should be written off at such an early stage. I don't know, and I don't see that it will ever be possible to prove what a person would or would not have gone on to do if he had not been discouraged in this way.

I do worry, however, that many provisional citizens are not making the best possible use of their three months of probation. Let's take a historical perspective.

In the ancient republic very few people, if any, would gain Roman citizenship before they had been exposed to Roman life for a good length of time. There were two main ways in which adult foreigners acquired Roman citizenship: they were the slaves of Roman citizens who were set free and thus acquired citizenship, or they were citizens of Latin cities who moved to settle in Rome and thus acquired citizenship. A slave of a Roman citizen would, of course, have spent much of his life in Rome before becoming a citizen. A Latin citizen would have lived all his life in a community very similar to Rome and would have come into frequent contact with Rome and Romans through commerce, religious festivals, travel, and service in the Roman army.

This meant that a new citizen would already understand how Roman life worked. That's very important, and that's one thing which the probation-plus-test system partly replicates. But it meant more than that. The new citizen did not only know, in a rather abstract and academic way, about Roman life: he was actually already involved in it. He would already have Roman friends, acquaintances, business contacts, and so on. He would already be to some extent a member of the community. His new citizenship would not be his entry into that community, it would simply open up opportunities to participate in that community in ways he previously could not.

This is not, I think, the norm in Nova Roma. I say again that I have no firm evidence on this point, but this is my impression. My impression is that most people sign up for their three months' probation, sit around for three months, sit the test (or don't), and come out of the whole process as uninvolved in our community as they were when they arrived. Possibly some never get involved. No doubt many do get involved, but they have really gained nothing from their probation. They ought to have been involved from the beginning. There are notable exceptions: people who, sometimes even before they apply for citizenship, come to this forum and ask questions, or go to one of the other fora such as the 'new Roman' list, or make contact privately with existing citizens. By the time these people finish their three months and pass their test, they are really ready to take up the new opportunities which full citizenship gives them. But my impression is that these are exceptions, and that their exceptional behaviour is due almost entirely to their own initiative.

These are not criticisms of the current system. I don't suggest that we should introduce some more stringent regime of probation, such as requiring provisional citizens to make at least five friends or join at least three sodalitates or write at least seven and a half messages to e-mail lists or anything like that. In fact I have no particular recommendations or suggestions at all. I just wish to raise the issue and to encourage people to think about how we could get our system working a little more like the old Roman way.

I'll offer a couple of pointers to areas which I think could be improved. First, I've mentioned the 'new Roman' list. I don't doubt that this serves a useful function for some new citizens. I am worried, however, by the way this list is presented by some (not all) of those who promote it. It is sometimes presented not as a staging-post on the way to full participation in the community but as an *alternative* to full participation in the community. The goal should always be to encourage new, provisional, and prospective citizens to get involved in all the aspects of Roman life which are open to them. I fear that sometimes people who join the 'new Roman' list are told, in effect, that the rest of Nova Roma, and particularly this forum which ought to be the heart of our civic life, is a scary and unpleasant place which is best avoided, and that the 'new Roman' list is somewhere safe and comfortable to hide from all the nastiness outside. This is decidedly not what is needed.

Secondly, I wonder whether the terminology of provisional citizenship and the way in which it is presented to new citizens may be unhelpful. I don't know exactly what is said to prospective and provisional citizens about the probation, the test, and their status and position during that period. I get the impression, however, that many provisional citizens end up feeling that they are expected to keep their heads down and their mouths shut for three months. I don't know what gives them this feeling. Perhaps the terms "provisional citizenship" and "probation" make them feel that they are being observed and tested, and that the safest way to avoid failing this probation is to remain inconspicuous. Perhaps, on the contrary, the fact that they are counted as citizens from the outset, albeit provisional ones, gives them a feeling of complacency which does not encourage them to earn their full citizenship by making contacts and finding their way around the community. Perhaps the fact that they are specifically tested on certain details and nothing else makes them think that these are the only details they need to know and that there is no need to do anything else during their probation. Perhaps none of these things makes a blind bit of difference. But I think it would be worth re-examining the way this probation system is presented. Would it, perhaps, be rather less confusing and more in tune with Roman practice to say that these people are not citizens at all but are merely spending time becoming members of the community and working towards citizenship?

Thirdly, I feel that much more could and should be done to help new and provisional citizens understand how they fit into the community. A Roman citizen is not an isolated individual floating freely in a sea of other isolated individuals. He is a member of a large number of social and civil networks of different kinds. It is important for him to know about each of these networks, and for each of them to know about him, and for them both to understand their relationship. A new citizen is a member of a tribe. Is he at any stage told which tribe, or does he have to find out for himself? Is he told what a tribe is? Are the other members of his tribe informed about his existence? Do they, indeed, know what a tribe is? He is also a member of a province. Is he told how to get in touch with his provincial governor? Is his provincial governor told that a new citizen has arrived? He enters a gens. Are the other families in the gens aware of his appearance? Does it matter? These are perhaps questions which should be considered. I don't know whether it is really the job of the state to put new citizens in touch with all these different networks and social structures, but there can be no doubt that these structures and networks are extremely important and that both new citizens and the whole community would benefit greatly if every new citizen knew where he fitted into them and was ready to take up his proper place in them.

I hope, as always, that I have said something which has set someone thinking, and that those thoughts will ultimately bring us a better and more Roman community.





___________________________________________________________
Inbox full of unwanted email? Get leading protection and 1GB storage with All New Yahoo! Mail. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48926 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: De censorum edicto
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

I heartily a somewhat belatedly welcome this edictum of the censores. I only wish to add a little note which is not intended as a criticism of the censores but merely as a small contribution to our ongoing effort to think and behave in a more Roman way.

The censores wrote, "We hereby issue an official apology to Lucius Marius Fimbria on behalf of the Office of the Censores of Nova Roma". I respectfully suggest that this is not a very Roman thing to do.

My point is not that Romans never apologized. It's actually true that they very rarely did, but that's not the point here. The point is that the censores have apologized not for something *they* did, but for something their predecessors in office did.

In the modern world we are used to thinking of certain jobs and offices as having some sort of continuous and independent existence which has nothing to do with the individuals who hold those jobs and offices. In Anglo-American legal terminology we talk about a "corporation sole". European monarchs (those few who are left) are corporations sole: in the U.K., for example, the Queen is not merely an individual who happens to be Queen but the holder of an office - "the Crown" - which exists independently of herself, which existed before she was born, and which will exist after she dies. The Crown is a continuous entity with its own legal powers and duties, and it is really immaterial who happens to be doing the job at any given moment. Queen Elizabeth II is, for most legal purposes, the same person as King George VI before her, and King Edward VIII before him, and so on. Similarly we have commercial companies which continue to exist independently of their employees, managers, directors, &c. The company may be held financially responsible for something which it "did", so to speak, fifty years ago, even though all the people who actually made the relevant decisions and carried out the relevant orders are no longer working for the company at all. Even though the person who happens to be King, or the person who happens to run the company, may die and it may be a little while before the next person comes in to take over the job, the Crown continues to exist uninterrupted, as does the company.

The Romans did not, by and large, think in this way. There are exceptions, especially with regard to families. But they certainly did not think in this way about political offices. This year's consules are not in any sense the same legal entities as last year's consules. The consulate has no existence independent of its holders. "Consul" is not a legal person, it is just a title and a set of powers and duties which attach to a particular person. If by some mischance there is no consul, the consulate ceases to exist. Its powers and duties are dispersed among various other people and bodies. And, most importantly in this case, this year's consules are in no sense responsible for things done by previous consules. They cannot take credit for them, and they cannot be blamed for them. The same is true of all magistrates, and indeed it is especially so for the censores, since their office was actually vacant for three and a half out of every five years and most certainly did not exist in any abstract sense during those periods of vacancy.

So it really not within the power of our censores, much though they may wish to, to apologize for things done by previous censores. They cannot apologize of behalf "the office of the censores" because this is not an entity which has any continuous existence. If by "office" they mean "job" or "magistracy" then, as I've already said, this magistracy does not exist independently of the censores themselves, and they cannot apologize on behalf of it. If by "office of the censores" they mean "body of staff working for the censores" then this, too, has no independent existence, because each censor's staff is merely an assemblage of people appointed by him for the duration of his magistracy. It ceases to exist when he leaves office, and the staff assembled by his successor is a different entity, even if it may contain some or even all of the same people. If we look at this from a Roman perspective, we must conclude that the censores can only meaningfully apologize for things which they themselves have done. If anyone is to apologize for a nota imposed on L. Marius, it must be the people who were censores when it was imposed.

None of this is, of course, meant to detract from the sincerity of the censores' statement. Clearly what they mean is that they think their predecessors acted wrongly and they wish to assure Marius that they do not support that act. That is a fine sentiment and finely said. It was merely expressed in a way which is not really in tune with a Roman view of the world.







___________________________________________________________
New Yahoo! Mail is the ultimate force in competitive emailing. Find out more at the Yahoo! Mail Championships. Plus: play games and win prizes.
http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://mail.yahoo.net/uk
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48927 From: D. Aemilus Severus Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: the citizenship test
D. Aemilius Severus A. Apollonio Cordo Omnibusque sal.

Here are some of my incomplete thoughts and ramblings:

Nova Roma cannot control what "baggage" people "walk" in here with when it
comes to tests and wait times. I personally had no problem with this
process. Another approach, though a bit more work intensive, is to follow
the Roman idea of clientship. A new citizen could be sponsored, then
mentored by an established citizen. There are potential problems I could
see with this, along with potential ways of abuse of such a system, and in
fact it may discourage more than the current system.

Let me answer a couple of the questions you brought up.


On 2/3/07, A. Apollonius Cordus <a_apollonius_cordus@...> wrote:
>
>
> A new citizen is a member of a tribe. Is he at any stage told which tribe,
> or does he have to find out for himself? Is he told what a tribe is? Are the
> other members of his tribe informed about his existence?
>
>
To my knowledge I have not been assigned to a tribe until the next round of
elections. This may be mistaken, but it is what I have gathered. How this
is done I don't know, but I think it is random depending on vacancies in
various urban tribes. I kind of doubt I will get a welcoming letter, but
maybe.

He is also a member of a province. Is he told how to get in touch with
> his provincial governor? Is his provincial governor told that a new citizen
> has arrived?
>
>
This is very well done. I was immediately contacted by the governor and
invited to join the provincial list.

He enters a gens. Are the other families in the gens aware of his
> appearance?
>

To be honest I can't recall, but I don't think there was anything formal. I
did receive a welcome from my provincial governor who is also of the same
gens, and he welcomed me to the gens also.

I like the current system, and having written the citizenship test earlier
last month, it was something exciting for me. If it was a simple "click"
process, then I feel it wouldn't be worth anything. I feel now that it is
worth something.

Just my two sestertii.

Di vos incolumes custodiant.

D�AEMILIVS�SEVERVS



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48928 From: Michael Sullivan Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2792
Salve C. Curi Saturnine et al.

> I'm afraid I have to take a critical stand in this issue. I think
> this very policy is the reason why there has been diminishing
> interest from our citizens to participate and be active. It's like
> pouring a bucket of cold water on new enthusiastic and unsure
> prospective citizen, that we ask him/her to take a test.

The test did nothing of the sort for me, actually. If anything, it prodded me into a higher state of activity. It turns out that university has been having the most negative effect on my personal activity, so perhaps it would be better to do away with that, instead.

Valete omnes,
M. Apollonius Noctua


---------------------------------
Finding fabulous fares is fun.
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48929 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE VIII-MMDCCLX A.U.C
EDICTUM CONSULARE VIII-MMDCCLX A.U.C

Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

If individuals would like to donate money to Nova Roma we welcome their support..

But to ensure that the money goes to the project or fund it was meant to the following will apply to all donation as of ante diem III Nonas Februarius MMDCCLX A.U.C

Any funds donated for the payment of taxes must state that they are for taxes and include both macro nation,Nova Roman names and province .

Any funds donated to the Magna Mater project or any other named project must include the words Magna Mater or the name of the project in question..

Any funds donated to the Scholarship fund must be noted Scholarship Fund.

Any Funds donated and are not designated to a specific fund shall be deemed a general donation and shall be placed in the general treasury for use as the Senate
of Nova Roma sees fit.

This edict takes effect immediately

Done this day of ante diem III Nonas Februarius MMDCCLX A.U.C. at 9:10 PM, Roman time in the consulship of L. Arminius Faustus and Ti. Galerius Paulinus


3 February 2007




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48930 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE VIII-MMDCCLX A.U.C
Salve Consul Tiberi,

If I am mailing in my usual money order or bank draft to Wells,
should I in this case send three separate cheques for lets say NR,
MM, Taxes for myself and others or is it better to send one check
with the requested break down as to where the funds should go?

Thanks,

QSP






--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@...>
wrote:
>
> EDICTUM CONSULARE VIII-MMDCCLX A.U.C
>
> Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
> If individuals would like to donate money to Nova Roma we welcome
their support..
>
> But to ensure that the money goes to the project or fund it was
meant to the following will apply to all donation as of ante diem
III Nonas Februarius MMDCCLX A.U.C
>
> Any funds donated for the payment of taxes must state that they are
for taxes and include both macro nation,Nova Roman names and
province .
>
> Any funds donated to the Magna Mater project or any other named
project must include the words Magna Mater or the name of the project
in question..
>
> Any funds donated to the Scholarship fund must be noted
Scholarship Fund.
>
> Any Funds donated and are not designated to a specific fund shall
be deemed a general donation and shall be placed in the general
treasury for use as the Senate
> of Nova Roma sees fit.
>
> This edict takes effect immediately
>
> Done this day of ante diem III Nonas Februarius MMDCCLX A.U.C. at
9:10 PM, Roman time in the consulship of L. Arminius Faustus and Ti.
Galerius Paulinus
>
>
> 3 February 2007
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48931 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE VIII-MMDCCLX A.U.C
Salve Quintus Suetonius Paulinus

Amice

Please save yourself some trouble and send in just one check
but clearly note what the money is for.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


----- Original Message -----
From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)<mailto:mjk@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 3:38 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE VIII-MMDCCLX A.U.C


Salve Consul Tiberi,

If I am mailing in my usual money order or bank draft to Wells,
should I in this case send three separate cheques for lets say NR,
MM, Taxes for myself and others or is it better to send one check
with the requested break down as to where the funds should go?

Thanks,

QSP

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@...>
wrote:
>
> EDICTUM CONSULARE VIII-MMDCCLX A.U.C
>
> Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
> If individuals would like to donate money to Nova Roma we welcome
their support..
>
> But to ensure that the money goes to the project or fund it was
meant to the following will apply to all donation as of ante diem
III Nonas Februarius MMDCCLX A.U.C
>
> Any funds donated for the payment of taxes must state that they are
for taxes and include both macro nation,Nova Roman names and
province .
>
> Any funds donated to the Magna Mater project or any other named
project must include the words Magna Mater or the name of the project
in question..
>
> Any funds donated to the Scholarship fund must be noted
Scholarship Fund.
>
> Any Funds donated and are not designated to a specific fund shall
be deemed a general donation and shall be placed in the general
treasury for use as the Senate
> of Nova Roma sees fit.
>
> This edict takes effect immediately
>
> Done this day of ante diem III Nonas Februarius MMDCCLX A.U.C. at
9:10 PM, Roman time in the consulship of L. Arminius Faustus and Ti.
Galerius Paulinus
>
>
> 3 February 2007
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48932 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE VIII-MMDCCLX A.U.C
Salve Consul Pauline,

Ti. Galerius Paulinus writes:

> This edict takes effect immediately

Immediately in what sense? Given that checks sit in the Post Office box for
weeks at a time, I recommend some careful thought here. Some well
intentioned person may have sent us a check last week for the current year's
taxes. That check will not hit the bank until the next time Patricia Cassia
cleans out the PO Box. By this edictum you'd put those funds into the
general treasury, even though it's obvious from the amount that they're
intended as a tax payment.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48933 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE IX-MMDCCLX A.U.C
EDICTUM CONSULARE IX-MMDCCLX A.U.C

Ex Officio Ti. Galerius Paulinus

Pursuant to a request from the Nova Roman Senate the
Consuls L. Arminius Faustus and Ti. Galerius Paulinus
announce the formation of an

Internal Financial Audit Committee to consist of the following
Senators and chaired by C. Popillius Laenas

M. Arminius Maior
C. Curius Saturninus
G. Equitius Marinus
G. Flavius Diocletianus
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
C. Popillius Laenas
Q. Suetonius Paulinus

Senator Patricia Cassia shall serve on the committee as a non
voting advisor and resource member Senator Cassia shall provide
the Committee with the following items per the request of the
Senate and this written notice of the Consuls.

All bank Account information and statements of financial activity
pertaining to Nova Roma Inc. Those held in the USA and else where.

Including but not limited to

The names of all financial institutions and account numbers of each
Nova Roman account.

The types of Accounts i.e. Certificate of Deposits, Savings,
Checking etc

The current balance of each, date of maturely if it applies.

A list of the donations to the Magna Mater fund and any and all
expensive

And any other information the committee or the Consuls request.

The Committee will, within thirty days, present the following
to the Consuls L. Arminius Faustus and Ti. Galerius Paulinus

A summary of errors or omissions they find.

Inspection of the current Budget Spreadsheet to determine any flaws
in budget methodologies which precipitate errors.

Submit any recommendations regarding more efficient methods of record
keeping to minimize the potential for errors.

And any other recommendations pertaining to the finances of Nova
Roma.

The following documentation is uploaded to the Senate files for the
assistance of the committee.

Spreadsheet of Nova Roma Budgets up to and including Adopted Spring
Budget 2759

Magna Mater Spreadsheet up to and including 2759

A statement of Income and Expenses for year end 2759 AUC as reported
to last year's Consuls

Spreadsheets of Tax Activity shall be forwarded to Consular Quaestors
and Consuls

Also tax amounts paid for 2760 shall be likewise forwarded.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48934 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE X-MMDCCLX A.U.C
EDICTUM CONSULARE X-MMDCCLX A.U.C

Ex Officio Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

The term of the current Propraetor of Hispania Marcus Curiatius
Complutensis is extend until the Nova Roman Senate appoints a
replacement.

This edict takes effect immediately

Done this day of Pridie Nonas Februarias at 12:08 AM ,
Roman time in the consulship of L. Arminius Faustus
and Ti. Galerius Paulinus


4 February 2007
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48935 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2007-02-03
Subject: Checks etc.
Salve Gnaeus Equitius Marinus

Yours is a valid point and we will make sure we give
credit where is do on any checks received in the next few weeks.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48936 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-04
Subject: Telethon to save the Palatine
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48937 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-04
Subject: prid. Non. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est pridie Nonas Februarius; haec dies nefastus est.

"Upon the arrival of the ambassadors at Rome, Tullius, suspecting that
they had come to demand satisfaction, resolved to anticipate them in
doing this, since he wished to turn upon the Albans the blame for
breaking the compact between them and their colony. For there existed
a treaty between the two cities which had been made in the reign of
Romulus, wherein, among other articles, it was stipulated that neither
of them should begin a war, but if either complained of any injury
whatsoever, that city would demand satisfaction from the city which
had done the injury, and failing to obtain it, should then make war as
a matter of necessity, the treaty being looked upon as already broken.
Tullius, therefore, taking care that the Romans should not be the
first called upon to give satisfaction and, by refusing it, become
guilty in the eyes of the Albans, ordered the most distinguished of
his friends to entertain the ambassadors of the Albans with every
courtesy and to detain them inside their homes while he himself,
pretending to be occupied with some necessary business, put off their
audience. The following night he sent to Alba some Romans of
distinction, duly instructed as to the course they should pursue,
together with the fetiales, to demand satisfaction from the Albans for
the injuries the Romans had received. These, having performed their
journey before sunrise, found Cluilius in the market-place at the time
when the early morning crowd was gathered there. And having set forth
the injuries which the Romans had received at the hands of the Albans,
they demanded that he should act in conformity with the compact
between the cities. But Cluilius, alleging that the Albans had been
first in sending envoys to Rome to demand satisfaction and had not
even been vouchsafed an answer, ordered the Romans to depart, on the
ground that they had violated the terms of the treaty, and declared
war against them. The chief of the embassy, however, as he was
departing, demanded from Cluilius an answer to just this one question,
namely, whether he admitted that those were violating the treaty who,
being the first called upon to give satisfaction, had refused to
comply with any part of their obligation. And when Cluilius said he
did, he exclaimed: 'Well, then, I call the gods, whom we made
witnesses of our treaty, to witness that the Romans, having been the
first to be refused satisfaction, will be undertaking a just war
against the violators of that treaty, and that it is you Albans who
have avoided giving satisfaction, as the events themselves show. For
you, being the first called upon for satisfaction, have refused it and
you have been the first to declare war against us. Look, therefore,
for vengeance to come upon you ere long with the sword.' Tullius,
having learned of all this from the ambassadors upon their return to
Rome, then ordered the Albans to be brought before him and to state
the reasons for their coming; and when they had delivered the message
entrusted to them by Cluilius and were threatening war in case they
did not obtain satisfaction, he replied: 'I have anticipated you in
doing this, and having obtained nothing that the treaty directs, I
declare against the Albans the war that is both necessary and just.'"
- Dionysius of Halicarnassus 3.2


February is dedicated to the god Mars and Iuno in her aspect as Iuno
Sospita. Mars was initially a god of springtime and fertility before
he was a god of war. The first god Romans (and Italians) recognised as
the chief of all the divinities, he was associated with Iuppiter (who
later became top god) and Quirinus. These three shared an ancient
sanctuary housed in the Regia in the Roman forum.

Although often associated with the Greek Ares, Mars is separate. Not a
bellacose bringer of war like Ares, Mars is instead the protector of
the Roman people, in agriculture as well as in war. Additionally, in
the Roman tradition Mars was conceived by the Queen of Heaven alone.
According to Ovid Mars was conceived by Iuno via a flower with fertile
properties which the goddess Flora obtained for her.

He was the protector of agriculture who lived in forests and
mountains. The first month of the Roman calendar, Martius, which
originally began on the vernal equinox, honored the god and marked the
annual return of life to the Earth, as this was the season for
planting crops. For a time Mars was both an agricultural and military
deity, thus symbolizing the duality of the Roman citizen as both
farmer and soldier. Eventually, Mars transferred his agricultural
duties to Ceres and Liber, and his chief concern became that of
protecting the Roman state in time of war, much as among mortals the
defense of the state passed out of the hands of a militia --
temporarily raised from the agrarian citizenry to meet an immediate
threat -- and instead became the responsibility of a huge standing
army of professional soldiers. As god of war Mars was accompanied by
the goddess Bellona.

The sacrarium of Mars stood on the Palatine Hill in the Roma Quadrata
of Romulus, and this is where his sacred spears and shields, the
symbolic armory of the Roman state, were kept. At first there was only
one shield, dropped from the sky by Mars to the second Roman king Numa
Pompilius as a token of his benevolence, but in order to insure
against theft or destruction, Numa had eleven identical shields made.
The twelve shields were then placed under the stewardship of the
Salii, a college of twelve priests created by Numa for that purpose.
The Salii ("jumpers"), who served both Quirinus and Mars, derived
their name from the procession through the streets of the city which
they completed by jumping the entire way and singing the Carmen
Saliare. Primitively the rites of the Salii were intended to protect
the growth of plants. Mars' own priest was called the flamen
Martialis. In the Regia on the Forum Romanum, the hastae Martiae
("lances of Mars") were kept. When these lances moved, it was seen as
a portent of war. Whenever war broke out, it was the consul's
ceremonial duty to shake the sacred spears and shout "Mars vigila!"
("Mars, wake up!").


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Mars (http://www.ancientsites.com)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48938 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-02-04
Subject: Fw: [Explorator] explorator 9.41
Salvete Romans

FYI
----- Original Message -----
From: david meadows<mailto:rogueclassicist@...>
To: explorator@yahoogroups.com<mailto:explorator@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 9:35 AM
Subject: [Explorator] explorator 9.41


================================================================
explorator 9.41 February 4, 2006
================================================================
Editor's note: Most urls should be active for at least eight
hours from the time of publication.

For your computer's protection, Explorator is sent in plain text
and NEVER has attachments. Be suspicious of any Explorator which
arrives otherwise!!!
================================================================
================================================================
Thanks to Arthur Shippee, Bill Kennedy, Croman mac Nessa,
Dave Sowdon, Donna Hurst, 'Duke Jason', Edward Rockstein,
Joan Griffith, John McMahon, Joseph Lauer, Kris Curry,
Michael Oberndorf, Mike Ruggeri, Mark Morgan, Richard C. Griffiths,
Rochelle Altman, Ross W Sargent, Bob Heuman, Stan Nadel, Sue Day,
Tim Parkin, Toke Lindegaard Knudsen, Tom Elliott, Tony Jackson,
W. Richard Frahm, and Yonatan Nadelman for headses upses this
week (as always hoping I have left no one out).

n.b.: because of some 'getaway' plans, next week's edition will
likely go out Sunday evening rather than Sunday morning ...
================================================================
EARLY HUMANS
================================================================
Latest in the 'Hobbit' investigations:

http://tinyurl.com/2jvgpj<http://tinyurl.com/2jvgpj> (AFP via Yahoo)
http://www.news.com.au/sundaymail/story/0,,21140698-401,00.html<http://www.news.com.au/sundaymail/story/0,,21140698-401,00.html>
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6311619.stm<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6311619.stm>
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070129/sc_nm/hobbit_species_dc_1<http://newsyahoo.com/s/nm/20070129/sc_nm/hobbit_species_dc_1>
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16876005/<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16876005/>
================================================================
ANCIENT NEAR EAST AND EGYPT
================================================================
Gilded solar child relief from Luxor:

http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2007/830/fr2.htm<http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2007/830/fr2.htm>

On Syria as the 'cradle of civilizations':

http://www.sana.org/eng/22/2007/01/30/99706.htm<http://www.sana.org/eng/22/2007/01/30/99706.htm>

A late Byzantine mosaic from Beit Ras:

http://www.petra.gov.jo/nepras/2007/Feb/03/24000.htm<http://www.petra.govjo/nepras/2007/Feb/03/24000.htm>

An image of that 'oldest Semitic inscription' (the snake curse
thing) ... with a link to a good press release as well:

http://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/2979.php?from=89727<http://wwweurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/2979.php?from=89727>

cf:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/01/070129100250.htm<http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/01/070129100250.htm>

Looking at Parthian and Achaemenid fabrics:

http://www.mehrnews.ir/en/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=441813<http://www.mehrnews.ir/en/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=441813>

More coverage of Egypt's derision at the new 'Seven Wonders'
thing:

http://tinyurl.com/32c9wm<http://tinyurl.com/32c9wm> (AP via Yahoo)
http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20070130/3035699.asp<http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20070130/3035699.asp>

More Dor Beach shipwreck coverage:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/01/070128143941.htm<http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/01/070128143941.htm>

More coverage of ire arising from Israeli archaeologists'
digging near the al-Aqsa Mosque:

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L29208864.htm<http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L29208864.htm>

The fate of those Iranian inscriptions at the Oriental Institute
which were brought into play in a bombing case is still up in
the air, it seems:

http://www.payvand.com/news/07/feb/1029.html<http://www.payvand.com/news/07/feb/1029.html>

Egyptology News Blog:

http://egyptology.blogspot.com/<http://egyptology.blogspot.com/>

Egyptology Blog:

http://www.egyptologyblog.co.uk/<http://www.egyptologyblog.co.uk/>

Iraq War and Archaeology:

http://www.archaeos.org/iwa/<http://www.archaeos.org/iwa/>

Paleojudaica:

http://paleojudaica.blogspot.com/<http://paleojudaica.blogspot.com/>

Archaeologist at Large:

http://spaces.msn.com/members/ArchaeologyinEgypt/<http://spaces.msn.com/members/ArchaeologyinEgypt/>
================================================================
ANCIENT GREECE AND ROME (AND CLASSICS)
================================================================
Some late Roman graves from Hungary:

http://tinyurl.com/28ygwl<http://tinyurl.com/28ygwl> (MTI)
http://www.inform.kz/showarticle.php?lang=eng&id=148225<http://www.inform.kz/showarticle.php?lang=eng&id=148225>

Looking at Pompeii's Samnite origins:

http://tinyurl.com/2f8rp3<http://tinyurl.com/2f8rp3> (ANSA)

Can't remember if we mentioned this Gallic burial last week:

http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article2190045.ece<http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article2190045.ece>

Renewed coverage of the find of Maxentius' insignia:

http://uktv.co.uk/index.cfm/uktv/History.news/aid/580962<http://uktv.co.uk/index.cfm/uktv/History.news/aid/580962>
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0%2C%2C13509-2575075%2C00.html<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0%2C%2C13509-2575075%2C00.html>
(photo)

The Roman amphitheatre in Chester now appears to be a miniature
version of the Colosseum:

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/article2214843.ece<http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/article2214843.ece>

They're excavating what they believe was the governor's residence
in Ephesus:

http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=65242<http://wwwturkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=65242>

Quite a bit of coverage of an article in AJA on why Greek art is
so, well, nude:

http://www.livescience.com/history/070202_greek_nudity.html<http://www.livescience.com/history/070202_greek_nudity.html>
http://tinyurl.com/2d2fc4<http://tinyurl.com/2d2fc4> (ls via Yahoo)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16948773/<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16948773/>

.. here's the original article:

http://www.ajaonline.org/index.php?ptype=content&aid=248<http://www.ajaonline.org/index.php?ptype=content&aid=248>

What James M. May has been up to:

http://fusion.stolaf.edu/news/index.cfm?fuseaction=NewsDetails&id=3725<http://fusion.stolaf.edu/news/index.cfm?fuseaction=NewsDetails&id=3725>

.. and Joan Breton Connelly:

http://tinyurl.com/29tg8g<http://tinyurl.com/29tg8g> (Princeton)

Nice column by Victor Davis Hanson on David Grene's work:

http://www.nysun.com/article/47770<http://www.nysun.com/article/47770>

A Classicist is the new prez of the AIA:

http://tinyurl.com/3dz4cu<http://tinyurl.com/3dz4cu>

On Horace and Julie Andrews:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2583236,00.html<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2583236,00.html>

A new Classics honour society at Gonzaga:

http://tinyurl.com/2z6y8d<http://tinyurl.com/2z6y8d>

Interesting item on the balance between progress and archaeology
during the ongoing construction of Rome's subway:

http://tinyurl.com/3ccrk6<http://tinyurl.com/3ccrk6> (IHT)
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2007-02-03-romesubway_x.htm<http://wwwusatoday.com/news/world/2007-02-03-romesubway_x.htm>
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070203/ap_on_sc/italy_subway_archaeology_2<http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070203/ap_on_sc/italy_subway_archaeology_2>
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16951411/<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16951411/>

A publicity stunt trying to get the return of the Elgin/Parthenon
marbles back did get a lot of publicity:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/31/arts/31arts.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/31/arts/31arts.html>
http://tinyurl.com/2j2atz<http://tinyurl.com/2j2atz> (Australian)
http://tinyurl.com/2pfsph<http://tinyurl.com/2pfsph> (CBC)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6313953.stm<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6313953.stm>

The hype for 300 is building:

http://film.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,2000426,00.html<http://film.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,2000426,00.html>

.. while Roman Polanski will direct a movie version of Harris' Pompeii:

http://tinyurl.com/yrhh7b<http://tinyurl.com/yrhh7b>
http://tinyurl.com/2xyt79<http://tinyurl.com/2xyt79>

More coverage of the impending reopening of the Domus Aurea:

http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/living/16594142.htm<http://www.phillycom/mld/dailynews/living/16594142.htm>
http://tinyurl.com/ysgz4d<http://tinyurl.com/ysgz4d> (AP via Yahoo)
http://tinyurl.com/2bdovv<http://tinyurl.com/2bdovv> (Australian)
http://tinyurl.com/2c2l47<http://tinyurl.com/2c2l47> (AFP via Yahoo)
http://tinyurl.com/ypqhjo<http://tinyurl.com/ypqhjo> (WPost)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16912846/<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16912846/>

More coverage of that gladiator relief antiquities recovery:

http://www.azstarnet.com/allheadlines/166081<http://www.azstarnet.com/allheadlines/166081>

Recent reviews from BMCR:

http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/recent.html<http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/recent.html>

Recent reviews from Scholia:

http://www.classics.und.ac.za/reviews/2006.htm<http://www.classics.und.acza/reviews/2006.htm>

Visit our blog:

http://www.atrium-media.com/rogueclassicism<http://www.atrium-media.com/rogueclassicism>

Mediterranean Archaeology:

http://medarch.blogspot.com/<http://medarch.blogspot.com/>
================================================================
EUROPE AND THE UK (+ Ireland)
================================================================
Some ancient footprints from a Welsh beach:

http://tinyurl.com/24fzqf<http://tinyurl.com/24fzqf> (Western Mail)

Plenty of coverage of the discovery of a 'worker's (or party)
village' near Stonehenge:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/31/world/europe/31stonehenge.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/31/world/europe/31stonehenge.html>
http://tinyurl.com/2ogyhk<http://tinyurl.com/2ogyhk> (AFP via Yahoo)
http://tinyurl.com/389e86<http://tinyurl.com/389e86> (Australian)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6311939.stm<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6311939.stm>
http://tinyurl.com/2rj5k7<http://tinyurl.com/2rj5k7> (CNN)
http://tinyurl.com/2oyf33<http://tinyurl.com/2oyf33> (USA Today)
http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1583400,00.html<http://wwwtime.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1583400,00.html>
http://tinyurl.com/2m8j9k<http://tinyurl.com/2m8j9k> (NPR ... good photo gallery)
http://tinyurl.com/33aayl<http://tinyurl.com/33aayl> (New Scientist)
http://tinyurl.com/2yn6qm<http://tinyurl.com/2yn6qm> (Globe)
http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn11067<http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn11067>
http://www.world-science.net/othernews/070130_durrington.htm<http://www.world-science.net/othernews/070130_durrington.htm>
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16887060/<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16887060/>

.. some video:

http://tinyurl.com/2f7fkl<http://tinyurl.com/2f7fkl> (NG)

.. and photos:

http://tinyurl.com/ys7afj<http://tinyurl.com/ys7afj> (NG)
Finds from various periods during construction of a section of
the A66:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/north_yorkshire/6316349.stm<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/north_yorkshire/6316349.stm>

Another shackled skeleton has been dug up ... this time from
Avila:

http://www.typicallyspanish.com/news/publish/article_8690.shtml<http://www.typicallyspanish.com/news/publish/article_8690.shtml>

The Guersey Maritime Trust is trying to preserve a couple of
important shipwrecks:

http://tinyurl.com/364a7z<http://tinyurl.com/364a7z> (Press and Star)

A Bronze Age hoard found in Cotswalds will remain there:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/gloucestershire/6312365.stm<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/gloucestershire/6312365.stm>

Archaeology in Europe Blog:

http://www.archaeology.eu.com/weblog/index.html<http://www.archaeology.eucom/weblog/index.html>
================================================================
ASIA AND THE SOUTH PACIFIC
================================================================
What pollen analysis is telling us about the Terracotta Warriors:

http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2007/01/29/terracottaarmy_arc.html<http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2007/01/29/terracottaarmy_arc.html>

Another discovery credited to clumsiness:

http://en.epochtimes.com/news/7-1-29/51096.html<http://en.epochtimes.com/news/7-1-29/51096.html>

On pottery and trade with New Guinea:

http://www.thenational.com.pg/020207/w7.htm<http://www.thenational.com.pg/020207/w7.htm>

Finding connections between Hindu and Maori cultures:

http://in.news.yahoo.com/070128/43/6bjw5.html<http://in.news.yahoo.com/070128/43/6bjw5.html>

Some Maori heads are being returned:

http://tinyurl.com/yv7n99<http://tinyurl.com/yv7n99> (ic Renfrewshire)

Plans are afoot to rebuild the A'Famosa fortress in Malacca:

http://tinyurl.com/3dske2<http://tinyurl.com/3dske2> (Star)

On recovering Chinese relics:

http://english.people.com.cn/200701/30/eng20070130_346095.html<http://english.people.com.cn/200701/30/eng20070130_346095.html>

New Zealand Archaeology eNews:

http://www.nzarchaeology.org/netsubnews.htm<http://www.nzarchaeology.org/netsubnews.htm>
================================================================
NORTH AMERICA
================================================================
Interesting flute discovery near Range Creek (Utah):

http://www.sunad.com/index.php?tier=1&pub=2006-12-19&page=news<http://www.sunad.com/index.php?tier=1&pub=2006-12-19&page=news>
http://www.sunad.com/index.php?tier=1&pub=2007-01-04&page=news<http://www.sunad.com/index.php?tier=1&pub=2007-01-04&page=news>
(scroll down on the latter)

A possible burial mound near Columbus:

http://www.wishtv.com/global/story.asp?s=6016524<http://www.wishtv.com/global/story.asp?s=6016524>

Workers putting in a new waterpipe have seriously damaged a
site in Albuquerque:

http://www.newschannel10.com/global/story.asp?s=6002879<http://www.newschannel10.com/global/story.asp?s=6002879>

Wow ... archaeology has shut down energy development in a
big chunk of Utah:

http://www.sltrib.com/ci_5141313?source=email<http://www.sltrib.com/ci_5141313?source=email>

A temperature record for the Great Plains (which is interesting
in light of recent press attention to a related issue):

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/01/070128105107.htm<http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/01/070128105107.htm>

Interesting opedish thing on assorted tales associated with the
Underground Railroad (especially the 'freedom quilts'):

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/02/opinion/02bordewich.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/02/opinion/02bordewich.html>

Relocating historic houses:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/01/garden/01moving.html<http://www.nytimescom/2007/02/01/garden/01moving.html>
================================================================
CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA
================================================================
More coverage of that evidence of Olmec culture in central
Mexico:

http://tinyurl.com/26z82c<http://tinyurl.com/26z82c> (NG)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070131/sc_nm/mexico_olmecs_dc_1<http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070131/sc_nm/mexico_olmecs_dc_1>
http://au.news.yahoo.com/070201/2/129oz.html<http://au.news.yahoo.com/070201/2/129oz.html>
http://tinyurl.com/ynpgwf<http://tinyurl.com/ynpgwf> (Reuters)

More coverage of acid rain damage at El Tajin:

http://tinyurl.com/yvuygy<http://tinyurl.com/yvuygy> (NG)

More coverage of that controversial bridge to Machu Picchu:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6292327.stm<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6292327.stm>
================================================================
OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST
================================================================
They're finally going to do some DNA tests to see if folks living
in a Chinese village are/can be descended from Crassus' legions:

http://tinyurl.com/2sbmtk<http://tinyurl.com/2sbmtk> (Telegraph)
http://tinyurl.com/2n5o8z<http://tinyurl.com/2n5o8z> (Gulf Times)

Also on the DNA front, studies suggest that humans arrived in
the Americas rather 'late':

http://tinyurl.com/284jhu<http://tinyurl.com/284jhu> (NG)

Revisiting the 1607 flood of southwest England:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/6305013.stm<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/6305013.stm>

Interesting slavery diary:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/hampshire/6307657.stm<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/hampshire/6307657.stm>

.. and a followup to that Barclay's/slavery story:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/02/nyregion/02yards.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/02/nyregion/02yards.html>

Assorted historical analaogies:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/04/magazine/04wwln_essay.t.html<http://wwwnytimes.com/2007/02/04/magazine/04wwln_essay.t.html>

Folks might be interested to read about the power of 'lecture
podcasts':

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/31/education/31education.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/31/education/31education.html>

On spotting forgeries:

http://www.physorg.com/news89574623.html<http://www.physorg.com/news89574623.html>

Two items of interest in this Arts Briefly column from the NYT
(on the delayed opening of the Rijksmuseum and the recovery of
some artifacts from Mali):

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/31/arts/31arts.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/31/arts/31arts.html>

.. while this one has items on Robin Hood and using titanium
in some restoration efforts at St. Mark's:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/02/arts/02arts.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/02/arts/02arts.html>

.. while the pigeons in St. Mark's Square might have to find
some new digs:

http://tinyurl.com/2bco3s<http://tinyurl.com/2bco3s> (NewsDaily)

Interesting followup oped piece on the revival of worship of
ancient Greek divinities:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,2003096,00.html<http://www.guardianco.uk/g2/story/0,,2003096,00.html>

Still looking for the Battle of Anghiari:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070130/lf_nm/italy_leonardo_dc_3<http://newsyahoo.com/s/nm/20070130/lf_nm/italy_leonardo_dc_3>

Interesting study of memory and literature:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/03/arts/03memo.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/03/arts/03memo.html>

cf: http://www.biopsychlab.com/<http://www.biopsychlab.com/>

More coverage of that donation of a Bodmer papyrus to the
Vatican:

http://www.zenit.org/english/visualizza.phtml?sid=101738<http://www.zenit.org/english/visualizza.phtml?sid=101738>
http://www.catholic.org/featured/headline.php?ID=4024<http://www.catholic.org/featured/headline.php?ID=4024>

The story behind Ashoura:

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Mideast-Shiites.html<http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Mideast-Shiites.html>

Questioning the authenticity of some Pollocks:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/30/us/30pollock.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/30/us/30pollock.html>

Review of A.C. Grayling, *Descartes*:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/04/books/review/Blackburn.t.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/04/books/review/Blackburn.t.html>

Review of Ewen and Ewen, *Typecasting*:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/04/books/review/Berreby.t.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/04/books/review/Berreby.t.html>

Review of Arthur Allen, *Vaccine*:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/04/books/review/Oshinsky.t.html<http://wwwnytimes.com/2007/02/04/books/review/Oshinsky.t.html>

Review of Andrew Hussey, *Paris: A Secret History*:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/04/books/review/Weber.t.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/04/books/review/Weber.t.html>

Assorted non-fiction reviews:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/04/books/review/McKelvey.t.html<http://wwwnytimes.com/2007/02/04/books/review/McKelvey.t.html>

Oxford Dictionary of National Biography Lives of the Week:

http://www.oxforddnb.com/public/lotw/<http://www.oxforddnb.com/public/lotw/>

Arts and Letters Daily:

http://aldaily.com/<http://aldaily.com/>
================================================================
TOURISTY THINGS
================================================================
Chiapas/Palenque:

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/53b6d1ea-aca5-11db-9318-0000779e2340.html<http://www.ft.com/cms/s/53b6d1ea-aca5-11db-9318-0000779e2340.html>

Desolation Canyon:

http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/1%2C1249%2C650225466%2C00.html<http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/1%2C1249%2C650225466%2C00.html>
================================================================
GENERAL MAGAZINES AND JOURNALS
================================================================
American Journal of Archaeology 111.1 (January 2007):

http://www.ajaonline.org/index.php?ptype=toc<http://www.ajaonline.org/index.php?ptype=toc>

Sparta 2.2:

http://prweb.com/releases/2007/2/prweb501915.htm<http://prweb.com/releases/2007/2/prweb501915.htm>

About.com Archaeology:

http://archaeology.about.com/<http://archaeology.about.com/>

Archaeoblog:

http://archaeoblog.blogspot.com/<http://archaeoblog.blogspot.com/>

Archaeology Briefs:

http://archaeologybriefs.blogspot.com/<http://archaeologybriefs.blogspot.com/>
================================================================
CRIME BEAT
================================================================
The looting of Afghanistan continues:

http://tinyurl.com/3b9cxd<http://tinyurl.com/3b9cxd> (Newsday)
http://tinyurl.com/3bv85m<http://tinyurl.com/3bv85m> (IHT)

A major (maybe) antiquities ring bust in Sicily:

http://tinyurl.com/3664dg<http://tinyurl.com/3664dg> (News.com)
http://tinyurl.com/375yze<http://tinyurl.com/375yze> (IOL)
http://tinyurl.com/yrlkkn<http://tinyurl.com/yrlkkn> (Bloomberg)

More on the use of diplomatic bags in the smuggling of antiquities:

http://www.theartnewspaper.com/article01.asp?id=552<http://www.theartnewspaper.com/article01.asp?id=552>

Sentencing in that case wherein some guy in Hawaii tried to sell
some antiquities he found in a cave:

http://www.khnl.com/Global/story.asp?S=6027371<http://www.khnl.com/Global/story.asp?S=6027371>

Some artifacts from Mali were recovered in France:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6314481.stm<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6314481.stm>
================================================================
NUMISMATICA
================================================================
The AIA seems to have a special focus on coins in the upcoming
renewal of an agreement about antiquities related to Cyprus:

http://www.archaeological.org/webinfo.php?page=10301<http://www.archaeological.org/webinfo.php?page=10301>

Hobbyblog:

http://hobbyblog.blogspot.com/<http://hobbyblog.blogspot.com/>

Ancient Coin Collecting:

http://ancientcoincollecting.blogspot.com/<http://ancientcoincollecting.blogspot.com/>

Ancient Coins:

http://classicalcoins.blogspot.com/<http://classicalcoins.blogspot.com/>
================================================================
EXHIBITIONS, AUCTIONS, AND MUSEUM-RELATED
================================================================
'Gods in Color':

http://tinyurl.com/2t47lh<http://tinyurl.com/2t47lh> (Kathimerini)
http://news.ert.gr/en/2/23045.asp<http://news.ert.gr/en/2/23045.asp>

Bactrian Gold:

http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2007/830/he1.htm<http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2007/830/he1.htm>

A very interesting collection put together by 'anonymous':

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/02/arts/design/02morg.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/02/arts/design/02morg.html>

They've been yakking about it for years, but the Uffizi might
actually finally be expanded:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/03/arts/03uffi.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/03/arts/03uffi.html>

Results of an auction of the (mostly porcelain) contents of
a Chinese shipwreck:

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/26153.html<http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/26153.html>
================================================================
OBITUARIES
================================================================
Mary Stanley Low:

http://news.independent.co.uk/people/obituaries/article2198421.ece<http://news.independent.co.uk/people/obituaries/article2198421.ece>

.. and from the NYT archives, Frederick Douglass:

http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/bday/0207.html<http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/bday/0207.html>

cf: (for interest's sake):

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/30/nyregion/30old.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/30/nyregion/30old.html>
================================================================
PODCASTS
================================================================
The Book and the Spade:

http://www.radioscribe.com/bknspade.htm<http://www.radioscribe.com/bknspade.htm>

Stone Pages Archaeology News:

http://news.stonepages.com/<http://news.stonepages.com/>

Archaeologica Audio News:

http://www.archaeologychannel.org/AudioNews.asp<http://www.archaeologychannel.org/AudioNews.asp>
================================================================
EXPLORATOR is a weekly newsletter representing the fruits of
the labours of 'media research division' of The Atrium. Various
on-line news and magazine sources are scoured for news of the
ancient world (broadly construed: practically anything relating
to archaeology or history prior to about 1700 or so is fair
game) and every Sunday they are delivered to your mailbox free of
charge!
================================================================
Useful Addresses
================================================================
Past issues of Explorator are available on the web via our
Yahoo site:

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Explorator/<http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Explorator/>

To subscribe to Explorator, send a blank email message to:

Explorator-subscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Explorator-subscribe%40yahoogroups.com>

To unsubscribe, send a blank email message to:

Explorator-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Explorator-unsubscribe%40yahoogroups.com>

To send a 'heads up' to the editor or contact him for other
reasons:

rogueclassicist@...<mailto:rogueclassicist%40gmail.com>
================================================================
Explorator is Copyright (c) 2007 David Meadows. Feel free to
distribute these listings via email to your pals, students,
teachers, etc., but please include this copyright notice. These
links are not to be posted to any website by any means (whether
by direct posting or snagging from a usenet group or some other
email source) without my express written permission. I think it
is only right that I be made aware of public fora which are
making use of content gathered in Explorator. Thanks!
================================================================





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48939 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2007-02-04
Subject: Re: the citizenship test
Salvete Omnes,

As I have been a full citizen of NR for about 1 month, perhaps my perspective on this issue might be pertinent to this discussion. Therefore, I would like to present my experience of NR thus far, and my thoughts on the probationary period, the test, and some of the comments made during this discussion.

To begin with, let me say that I had no problem with the probationary period, or with the concept of taking a citizenship test. NR is far more than an email list, it is a community, and in order for this community to function fully, it is essential that it's members (citizens) be informed and be willing to participate in a number of ways. At the very least, citizens should be able and willing to inform themselves concerning issues and candidates on which they will be vote ...and to vote ...so that the Government can be conducted based on their intelligent consideration. There are, of course, many other forms of participation ...but my point is that citizens are, and should be, expected to take an active role in this community ...something which is far less essential in most virtual communities.

While, in the best of all possible worlds, total immersion in the community would be the way to accomplish the familiarization of prospective citizens to the community culture, we are still (and likely to remain for some time) essentially a virtual community, that kind of immersion is impossible. The current waiting period, and the requirement of a simple test is the answer to the need of the community to cull the casual visitors from those who wish to become more active citizens. The method isn't perfect, but no method would be.

The problem, of course, is that participation cannot be forced, nor can it be predicted. In any organization, virtual or otherwise, members' participation varies widely, from minimal to extensive, depending on many factors.

When I discovered NR in September of 2006, I felt rather like a child turned loose in a candy store with a pocket full of money, and no adults to restrict me. I was delighted, fascinated and excited, and I read *everything* I could find. Soon after joining NR, I joined the NewRoman list, and pestered the list with questions involving most of what I read. I received excellent guidance there, which enabled me to continue my study of the site, and also enabled me to understand more of what was going on on the main list (which I read, and continue to read, assiduously).

Very shortly after joining NR, I was graciously welcomed by my Provincial Government, encouraged to join the Provincial list (which I did), and have even had the pleasure of meeting some of the citizens here at an event in December. Perhaps I'm just lucky and live in the right place, but my interactions on a provincial level have been absolutely positive and encouraging.

I soon was directed to, and joined several special interest groups of interest to me, and very much enjoy them, at this point, mostly quietly, but, as I become more educated and competent, that twill change.

It didn't take me long to realize that the ML, while essential to NR as the place where Government is conducted, pertinent information for all citizens is announced, and important and informative discussions are conducted, is also a formal setting. While most citizens who post on the main list are courteous and tolerant of newcomers, some are spectacularly not. More to the point, from my personal perspective, I felt, and feel, that until I have more experience and knowledge, I would be out of my depth were I to participate actively in most of the discussions here. At this point, I think it is best for me to read, consider, and learn quietly. I will say, though, that I am impressed by some of the scholarship I have seen here, and fascinated by watching our Government works. True, sometimes the discussions become contentious, but even when the fur flies, there is much good information to be gleaned, both about Ancient and New Rome.

After the initial starry eyed period, I went through a time of wondering if I belonged here, mostly because the community culture is unique, and I was concerned that I would not be able to find, or create, a place for myself among you. I came to the decision that it would be my responsibility to do so, and determined to take that responsibility, so here I remain, and here I intend to remain, making what contributions to the well being of this community as, and in the ways, I can.

Did I use my probationary period wisely? I don't know. I do know that how people use this period is unique to each person ...but, perhaps, allowing each person to choose how to use this time is important as well, as it is an indication of how they will conduct themselves after obtaining citizenship, and, more importantly, is the period when people become comfortable (or not) in this culture.

As to my tribe, it is my understanding that I will be assigned to one of the Urban tribes until I pay my taxes, and that upon doing so will be assigned to another tribe. It is also my understanding that my tribe is important primarily in voting, so I'm not sure that I expect to be in contact with other members of that tribe.

I would like to say a few things about the NewRoman list. The experienced members who have kindly devoted time and effort to helping newcomers and new citizens deserve, and have at least from *this* new citizen, praise and gratitude. Without them, NR would have been far more daunting, perhaps to the point that I would have left. They kept me from feeling overwhelmed by the wealth of information, and by the complexity of the community, and the NewRoman list provides me a place where I can feel more relaxed and informal ...and be myself. I am *very* glad that list was created, and it is because of people like M. Lucretius Agricola, A. Tullia Scholastica, M. Minucius Audens, and Cn. Equitius Marinus that I now have the self confidence to begin participating in NR in a more active way. Through their helpfulness and kindness, they have helped me begin to forge bonds with the community in an admittedly human and emotional way (essential for me), and to *feel* as well as know, intellectually, that I am, in truth, a part of the NR community.

Valete Bene,
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48940 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: De Aucupibus Senatui
L. Iunius Bassus quirítibus peregrínísque s.d.

From time to time I've heard the claim made here that in Res Publica Antiqua citizens could
eavesdrop at the entrances of the meeting places of the Senate. Is there any basis for this? If
there is, how does this fact relate to the secrecy with which Senatorial business in Res Publica
Nostra is held? Is the idea that we need not know the particulars of Senatorial debate
because we have available the Tribunes to see to our interests? Is a Senator allowed to reveal
to a civis what he himself as said in the Senate? Cicero published the first In Catalinam
speech, after all. Are the statements that are included alongside Senatorial votes in the
Reports of the Tribunes written exactly for that purpose, or are they snipped from Senatorial
debate at the discretion of the Tribunes?

Valete.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48941 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
L. Iunius Bassus quirítibus peregrínísque s.d.

From a Nova Roma Wiki article written by our Cordus, a name which certainly bears much
authority in such matters:

Listeners in the antechamber
Some people, though not permitted to enter the place where the senate was meeting, were
customarily permitted to enter the antechamber and listen from there. These included, in
particular, the young sons of men who were taking part in the meeting. This was also
where the tribuni plebis listened to proceedings before they gained the ius sententiae in
the third century B.C.
Listeners outside
Meetings of the senate were not in principle secret, and although only certain people were
allowed to attend meetings there was no rule preventing others from listening to the
meetings. On many occasions it is recorded that members of the public stood around the
doorway of the building where a meeting was taking place and listened to the
proceedings; if a large crowd gathered, those closer to the door would pass on the details
to those further away.
The presiding magistrate did, however, have a discretion to close the doors and thus
prevent members of the public hearing the debate.

So I guess that narrows my question. Why is there a standing injunction against the
People knowing anything that is discussed in the Senate in Res Publica Nostra? It would
certainly be possible for the Senatorial Yahoo! Group to be made open for cives to read
without enabling them to post--the equivalent I suppose, to listening in the doorway. Of
course, there would be no way to close the door. Though, come to think of it, there could
easily be one Yahoo! Group for publicly accessible meetings, and one for those in which
the presiding magistrate opts "to close the doors".

But here in Nova Roma, the Senate goes even further than closed doors. No one present in
a meeting is permitted to even speak of what goes on there. In Res Publica Antiqua, could
a presiding magistrate bar Senate meeting participants from discussing what went on
during a meeting behind closed doors?

Is there a law in Nova Roma that prevents our Conscript Fathers from discussing their
business? Is there any historical basis for such a practice? If not, why is our Senate
behaving ahistorically? What is the justification? Isn't the notion of secret government
antithetical to Res Publica?

Valete.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48942 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
Agricola Basso sal.

Maybe people don't make an issue of it because there is no practical
way to make it work. Were I a member of the Senate (and I am not) and
if I wanted to keep a discussion secret, I would simply use e-mail.

We could open the list for reading, as you suggest, but we could not
compel the Senatores to use it, except, perhaps, for voting. That
would get us exactly where we are now.


Optime vale!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48943 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
Bassus Agricolae sal.

You're right--there is nothing ultimately preventing Senatores from conducting public
business privately. But--if we had an open-door online Curia, and the debate seemed
oddly sparse there, either because our Senatores were too often favoring a closed-door
Curia, or because they were conducting Senatorial affairs by e-mail instead, the People
would at least notice this to be happening and have the option to wonder at it. In the
current state of affairs, we are not only deprived the opportunity of ever listening at the
doors, but we are not even permitted to ask about that which was discussed behind
them--or rather they are not permitted to answer. We are left to wonder at every
Senatorial deliberation--save for what we may glean from the Reports of Senate
Proceedings, which seem highly selective at best.

I think we ought to at least allow for some Senatorial debate to be transparent, and I'm
curious to know why any of it shouldn't be.

Vale bene.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@...> wrote:
>
> Agricola Basso sal.
>
> Maybe people don't make an issue of it because there is no practical
> way to make it work. Were I a member of the Senate (and I am not) and
> if I wanted to keep a discussion secret, I would simply use e-mail.
>
> We could open the list for reading, as you suggest, but we could not
> compel the Senatores to use it, except, perhaps, for voting. That
> would get us exactly where we are now.
>
>
> Optime vale!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48944 From: FAC Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Re: Conventus Vastensis - photos.
Salvete Omnes,

at http://italia.novaroma.org you'll find other photos about the
Conventus Histonii (Histonium is the roman name of Vasto).

As sais by my friend Sabinus, the week-end in the Samnium was
excellent and I would thank first of all Vindex and the Hotel
Montecarlo for the ospitality and all the partecipants to the meeting.
Specially thank you very much to all the dacians coming in Italy, we
spent funny time togheter and I hope to meet them as soon as possible.

Valete

Fr. Apulus Caesar
Praefectus Italiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48945 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Non. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est Nonis Februariis; haec dies nefastus est.

"Now I wish for a thousand tongues, and that spirit
Of yours, Homer, you who celebrated Achilles,
While I sing the sacred Nones in alternating verse." - Ovid, Fasti II

"After these pretences they both prepared themselves for war, not only
arming their own forces but also calling to their assistance those of
their subjects. And when they had everything ready the two armies drew
near to each other and encamped at the distance of forty stades from
Rome, the Albans at the Cluilian Ditches, as they are called (for they
still preserve the name of the man who constructed them) and the
Romans a little farther inside, having chosen the most convenient
place for their camp. When the two armies saw each other's forces
neither inferior in numbers nor poorly armed nor to be despised in
respect of their other preparations, they lost their impetuous ardour
for the combat, which they had felt at first because of their
expectation of defeating the enemy by their very onset, and they took
thought rather of defending themselves by building their ramparts to a
greater height than of being the first to attack. At the same time the
most intelligent among them began to reflect, feeling that they were
not being governed by the best counsels, and there was a spirit of
faultfinding against those in authority. And as the time dragged on
in vain (for they were not injuring one another to any notable extent
by sudden dashes of the light-armed troops or by skirmishes of the
horse), the man who was looked upon as responsible for the war,
Cluilius, being irked at lying idle, resolved to march out with his
army and challenge the enemy to battle, and if they declined it, to
attack their entrenchments. And having made his preparations for an
engagement and all the plans necessary for an attack upon the enemy's
ramparts, in case that should prove necessary, when night came on he
went to sleep in the general's tent, attended by his usual guard; but
about daybreak he was found dead, no signs appearing on his body
either of wounds, strangling, poison, or any other violent death." -
Dionysius of Halicarnassus 3.4


"The peacock made complaint to Juno that, while the nightingale
pleased every ear with his song, he himself no sooner opened his mouth
than he became a laughingstock to all who heard him. The Goddess, to
console him, said, "But you far excel in beauty and in size. The
splendor of the emerald shines in your neck and you unfold a tail
gorgeous with painted plumage." "But for what purpose have I," said
the bird, "this dumb beauty so long as I am surpassed in song?' "The
lot of each," replied Juno, "has been assigned by the will of the
Fates--to thee, beauty; to the eagle, strength; to the nightingale,
song; to the raven, favorable, and to the crow, unfavorable auguries.
These are all contented with the endowments allotted to them." - Aesop

Although February is dedicated to Mars, it is also dedicated to Iuno
Sospita, the Savior of the State and the special protectress of women
and children. Her temple in Rome was in the Forum Holitorium, and
hercult, that of Sospita (or "Sispes") was important in Lanuvium as
well. The cave where offerings were made is in Lanuvio, which is
about 40 km from Rome. The name Lanuvio is thought to be derived from
"the goddess covered in wool (lana)": girls offered barley-cakes to
the sacred snake in her grove, and if their offerings were accepted,
their virginity was confirmed and the year's fertility assured. She
wore a goat-skin headdress and carried a spear and a shield.


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Aesop
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48946 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
Lucius Iunius Bassus <iunius_verbosus@...> writes:

> Why is there a standing injunction against the
> People knowing anything that is discussed in the Senate in Res Publica
> Nostra?

Because the Senate is also the Board of Directors of Nova Roma Inc. Things
get discussed in Senate meetings that involve sensitive information that
ought not to be made public.

This is an issue that comes up from time to time. The answer is always the
same.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48947 From: Samantha Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Getting home access
Salvete,
Just dropping a note between classes to let everyone know that as of
tonight for the first time in over a year I will have home internet
access.

Hopefully with home access and not having to limit all my internet
dealings to what I can squeeze in before and between classes will mean
that I will be able to keep up better with what is going on.

I do have yahoo messenger as well where I will be available in the
evenings at lucia_modia_lupa

Everything has been going rather well here. I lost my public ritual
space since they are completely redoing the space for something else
and I can't afford to drive that far as frequently as I need to.
Scheduling problems also arose in December for a public ritual I
wanted to do (not to mention that the place was rather hard to find
for people). I am trying to find something closer to home to resume
public rituals. I would hold them at my home but I am rooming with my
father to share expenses while I am in school and he would go through
the roof.

Valete,

Lucia Modia Lupa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48948 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
L. Iunius Bassus Cn. Marino Censorio sal.

Respectfully, Censori, that is a very good reason why some business of the Senate should
be conducted behind closed doors. It may be a reason that all business of the Senate
should be conducted behind closed doors--though I can't imagine what sort of sensitive
information would be involved in a debate concerning, for example, an amendment. It
*does not* seem to me a reason, however, that all participants in the Senate should be
barred from mentioning *anything at all* that has been discussed in the Senate. If there
are matters too sensitive to be made public, ban the Senatores et al. from divulging those
specific matters.

What sort of things are we speaking of, by the way? Bank Account numbers? Personal
information of cives? The Board of Nova Roma Inc. discusses the public business of the
members (many of us paying members) of the organization, just as the Senate discusses
the public business of the Republic. In both facets of that body, shouldn't the greatest
degree of transparency possible be employed? Just how frequently are these sensitive
matters brought up? Do you mean to tell me that it is impossible to give us some degree
of access to Senate proceedings without divulging this information? There are no work-
arounds possible and worthwhile?

Vale.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Lucius Iunius Bassus <iunius_verbosus@...> writes:
>
> > Why is there a standing injunction against the
> > People knowing anything that is discussed in the Senate in Res Publica
> > Nostra?
>
> Because the Senate is also the Board of Directors of Nova Roma Inc. Things
> get discussed in Senate meetings that involve sensitive information that
> ought not to be made public.
>
> This is an issue that comes up from time to time. The answer is always the
> same.
>
> Vale,
>
> CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48949 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
Salve Luci Iuni,

Lucius Iunius Bassus <iunius_verbosus@...> writes:

[...]
> Do you mean to tell me that it is impossible to give us some degree
> of access to Senate proceedings

Yes. That's exactly what I mean. I didn't make the rule, it was made by
Senators before me. But as a Senator I obey it. I recommend you petition
the Consuls if you'd like to see it changed. They're the presiding
magistrates who have the authority to include items on the Senate agenda.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48950 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Re: the citizenship test
SALVE MARIA CAECA !

Your opinions honored you as new citizen.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Shoshana Hathaway"
<shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:
> As I have been a full citizen of NR for about 1 month, perhaps my
perspective on this issue might be pertinent to this discussion.
Therefore, I would like to present my experience of NR thus far, and
my thoughts on the probationary period, the test, and some of the
comments made during this discussion.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48951 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-02-05
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
Salve Gnae Marine et salvete omnes,

Scripsisti: "Yes. That's exactly what I mean. I didn't make the rule, it was made by
Senators before me. But as a Senator I obey it. I recommend you petition the Consuls if
you'd like to see it changed."

Naturally I would not, and did not, as you'll note, ask for anyone to break the rules. I've
only asked about the nature of those rules and the justification for them. Before I petition
the Consules to change anything, I should like to further understand the nature of those
rules, and the justification for them, as they relate to the concerns that I have expressed.
Toward that end, I have asked several questions, all of which save one you have ignored in
favor of this response to me. If there is anyone who *would* like to answer my questions,
rather than return that I should either seek in partial ignorance to change existing policy
or shut up and stop hassling people, those answers would be very welcome.

Vale et valete,

Bassus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Luci Iuni,
>
> Lucius Iunius Bassus <iunius_verbosus@...> writes:
>
> [...]
> > Do you mean to tell me that it is impossible to give us some degree
> > of access to Senate proceedings
>
> Yes. That's exactly what I mean. I didn't make the rule, it was made by
> Senators before me. But as a Senator I obey it. I recommend you petition
> the Consuls if you'd like to see it changed. They're the presiding
> magistrates who have the authority to include items on the Senate agenda.
>
> Vale,
>
> CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48952 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui<
L. Iunius Bassus Cn. Marino Censorio sal.

Gnae Marine, I want to apologize for the tone of my response to you earlier. I felt
frustrated with what I perceived to be a deliberate lack of response. It's possible too that,
if my perception was correct, that lack was motivated by a somewhat overly zealous
approach to what I had intended to be a harmless and very genuine line of inquiry. The
advice of a very sensible Roman led me to see that I may have misread, and that I had
been engaged in a line of rhetoric which may have been perceived as hostile. It's a shame
that I needed someone to point this out to me. It's a shame that I wrote out of frustration,
and took a deliberately hostile tone with you, a Roman who serves the Republic tirelessly.
Please know that I am ashamed. I will endeavor to act with more wisdom in the future.

Vale optime.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Luci Iuni,
>
> Lucius Iunius Bassus <iunius_verbosus@...> writes:
>
> [...]
> > Do you mean to tell me that it is impossible to give us some degree
> > of access to Senate proceedings
>
> Yes. That's exactly what I mean. I didn't make the rule, it was made by
> Senators before me. But as a Senator I obey it. I recommend you petition
> the Consuls if you'd like to see it changed. They're the presiding
> magistrates who have the authority to include items on the Senate agenda.
>
> Vale,
>
> CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48953 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
> A. Tullia Scholastica L. Iúnió Bassó M. Lucrétió Agricolae quiritibus S.P.D.
>
>
>
> Bassus Agricolae sal.
>
> You're right--there is nothing ultimately preventing Senatores from conducting
> public
> business privately. But--if we had an open-door online Curia, and the debate
> seemed
> oddly sparse there, either because our Senatores were too often favoring a
> closed-door
> Curia, or because they were conducting Senatorial affairs by e-mail instead,
> the People
> would at least notice this to be happening and have the option to wonder at
> it. In the
> current state of affairs, we are not only deprived the opportunity of ever
> listening at the
> doors, but we are not even permitted to ask about that which was discussed
> behind
> them--or rather they are not permitted to answer. We are left to wonder at
> every
> Senatorial deliberation--save for what we may glean from the Reports of Senate
> Proceedings, which seem highly selective at best.
>
> ATS: The posting of the Senate agenda and perhaps even the report itself
> are fairly new developments. The report covers the voting and any comments
> made by the senatores at the time. The contio is, and should be, private.
> Think of the Senate as a magisterial cohors. The activities within a
> magisterial cohors are to be conducted in camerá. It definitely would not be
> a good idea for citizenship applications to opened to the public, nor would
> every Gaius and Titius care to have his performance on the citizenship test
> held up for everyone to see. It is not a good idea for discussions of
> adlections and notae to be on public view before the appropriate time.
> Likewise, drafts of proposed laws and edicta and other matters are best
> debated among those chosen to deal with such matters. They will come out at
> the appropriate time.
>
> From time to time, very sensitive issues are debated in the Senate, and
> elsewhere in the cohortes, particularly in the censorial cohors, in which
> private information is revealed daily. One has to earn the trust that
> membership therein carries. The censores and the scribae, the other
> magistrates and the senatores, must be discreet in these matters.
>
> I think we ought to at least allow for some Senatorial debate to be
> transparent, and I'm
> curious to know why any of it shouldn't be.
>
> ATS: The answer to that is that some issues are extremely sensitive, and
> require a great deal of careful thought and deliberation, free from any
> consideration of external influence. It is unwise to open the proceedings to
> everyone in such situations, though perhaps trusted non-senatórés might
> conceivably be admitted as observers, as Cato and I were after our elections
> were certified. The tribúní are observers, too, not members of the Senate,
> who are there precisely so that they CAN provide a report of such senatorial
> business as may be made public without harming the Res Publica.
>
> Vale bene.
>
> Et tú, et vós omnés!
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "M.
> Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Agricola Basso sal.
>> >
>> > Maybe people don't make an issue of it because there is no practical
>> > way to make it work. Were I a member of the Senate (and I am not) and
>> > if I wanted to keep a discussion secret, I would simply use e-mail.
>> >
>> > We could open the list for reading, as you suggest, but we could not
>> > compel the Senatores to use it, except, perhaps, for voting. That
>> > would get us exactly where we are now.
>> >
>> >
>> > Optime vale!
>> >
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48954 From: marcasemproniaiustina Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Rogator
I would like to enter my name for the election to Rogator. I have not
held any other offices but I feel the duties of this office would most
fit my capabilities.
Marca Sempronia Iustina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48955 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Re: The cries of the Britons
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Marcio Crispo quiritibus s.p.d.
>
>
> Gaius Marcius Crispus A Tullia Scholastica, Cn Equitio Marino,T Galerio
> Paulino, Omnibusque S.P.D.
>
> "A. Tullia Scholastica" <<> > wrote: > ATS: You should be able to
> find a list of provincial citizens on the main website.
>
>>>> >>>Well, I couldn't find one.
>
> ATS2: It was on the earlier, actual, website, as opposed to the current
> wikipedia one. One could get a complete list of the citizens from each
> province. The wiki is comparatively new, and under construction, plus they
> have switched servers very recently.
>
>> >ATS: The taxation edictum comes out from the central government, and
> should appear later this month; our webmaster has a new server, and is
> building a new tool for tax payments.
>
>>>> >>>Yes, I eagerly await the opportunity to pay. (Please note that this
>>>> comment should not be taken to apply to the British Chancellor of the
>>>> Exchequer, though!)
>
> ATS: You may not be so willing when you hear how much it is....;-) We
> have great resistance to paying Uncle Sam, too, because he wants too much
> money from the people least able to contribute...and not enough from those who
> are better able to provide assistance.
>
>> >ATS: There is a provincial mailing list, moderated by Cordus, who, as noted
> earlier, is extremely busy.
>
>>>> >>>Thank you for advising me of this. I was not aware of it, or would
>>>> otherwise have not burdened the main list with my posts. Do you have a link
>>>> that will take me to this, please?
>
> ATS2: I see that former censor Quintilianus beat me to that...in any
> case, I am not very good on URLs. Moreover, I don¹t like to put them on
> mailing lists as that invites spam. Today we got porno spam in the Nova
> Britannia list.
>
>> >ATS: Senator Marinus provided you with a couple of names
>
>>>> >>>Indeed he did, and others have been most helpful also. I have emailed
>>>> the top name on those provided to me. I thank Marinus and all those who
>>>> have replied to me, with most valuable help and advice.
>
> ATS2: We do try to be helpful. Glad you are feeling less lonely. At
> least you may have other citizens within striking distance, whereas I do
> not...
>
>
>> > Vale et valete omnes!
>> >
>> > Gaius Marcius Crispus
> Less lonely Brit
>> >
> Vale, et valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48956 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2792
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica M. Apollonio Noctuae quiritibus S.P.D.
>
>
> Salve C. Curi Saturnine et al.
>
>> > I'm afraid I have to take a critical stand in this issue. I think
>> > this very policy is the reason why there has been diminishing
>> > interest from our citizens to participate and be active. It's like
>> > pouring a bucket of cold water on new enthusiastic and unsure
>> > prospective citizen, that we ask him/her to take a test.
>
> The test did nothing of the sort for me, actually. If anything, it prodded me
> into a higher state of activity. It turns out that university has been having
> the most negative effect on my personal activity, so perhaps it would be
> better to do away with that, instead.
>
> ATS: The test is, as you realize, very simple, and well within the
> capacities of most people, especially since it is open book. Now,
> universities, on the other hand, are SUPPOSED to keep young people out of
> trouble by occupying their time. Our little test merely ensures some level of
> understanding of ancient Rome and NR, and a degree of commitment to both.
>
> Valete omnes,
> M. Apollonius Noctua
>
> Vale, et valete.
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48957 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Re: Rogator
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica M. Semproniae Iustinae quiritibus S.P.D.
>
>
> I would like to enter my name for the election to Rogator. I have not
> held any other offices but I feel the duties of this office would most
> fit my capabilities.
>
> ATS: If I am not mistaken, the election for rogator is over, though there
> was no announcement that the cista was open for this purpose. The information
> I have states that the voting was scheduled to be over on January 31st.
>
> Marca Sempronia Iustina
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48958 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Market Day Chat on IRC, 2/7/2007, 12:00 am
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Market Day Chat on IRC
 
Date:   Wednesday February 7, 2007
Time:   12:00 am - 1:00 am
Location:   http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Market_Day_(Nova_Roma)
 
Copyright © 2007  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48959 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: post. Non. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est postridie Nonas Februarius; haec dies nefastus est.

"This unfortunate event appearing extraordinary to everybody, as one
would naturally expect, and the cause of it being enquired into — for
no preceding illness could be alleged — those who ascribed all human
fortunes to divine providence said that this death had been due to the
anger of the gods, because he had handled an unjust and unnecessary
war between the mother-city and her colony. But others, who looked
upon war as a profitable business and thought they had been deprived
of great gains, attributed the event to human treachery and envy,
accusing some of his fellow citizens of the opposing faction of having
made away with him by secret and untraceable poisons that they had
discovered. Still others alleged that, being overcome with grief and
despair, he had taken his own life, since all his plans were becoming
difficult and impracticable and none of the things that he had looked
forward to in the beginning when he first took hold of affairs was
succeeding according to his desire. But those who were not influenced
by either friendship or enmity for the general and based their
judgment of what had happened on the soundest grounds were of the
opinion that neither the anger of the gods nor the envy of the
opposing faction nor despair of his plans had put an end to his life,
but rather Nature's stern law and fate, when once he had finished the
destined course which is marked out for everyone that is born. Such,
then, was the end that Cluilius met, before he had performed any noble
deed. In his place Mettius Fufetius was chosen general by those in the
camp and invested with absolute power; he was a man without either
ability to conduct a war or constancy to preserve a peace, one who,
though he had been at first as zealous as any of the Albans in
creating strife between the two cities and for that reason had been
honoured with the command after the death of Cluilius, yet after he
had obtained it and perceived the many difficulties and embarrassments
with which the business was attended, no longer adhered to the same
plans, but resolved to delay and put off matters, since he observed
that not all the Albans now had the same ardour for war and also that
the victims, whenever he offered sacrifice concerning battle, were
unfavourable. And at last he even determined to invite the enemy to
an accommodation, taking the initiative himself in sending heralds,
after he had been informed of a danger from the outside which
threatened both the Albans and Romans, a danger which, if they did not
terminate their war with each other by a treaty, was unavoidable and
bound to destroy both armies." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus 3.5


"Ouranos came, bringing on night and longing for love, and he lay
about Gaia spreading himself full upon her. Then the son [Kronos] from
his ambush stretched forth his left hand and in his right took the
great long sickle with jagged teeth, and swiftly lopped off his own
father's members and cast them away to fall behind him ... and so soon
as he had cut off the members with flint and cast them from the land
into the surging sea, they were swept away over the main a long time:
and a white foam spread around them from the immortal flesh, and in it
there grew a maiden. First she drew near holy Kythera, and from there,
afterwards, she came to sea-girt Kypros, and came forth an awful and
lovely goddess, and grass grew up about her beneath her shapely feet.
Her gods and men call Aphrodite, and Aphrogeneia (the foam-born)
because she grew amid the foam, and Eustephanos (well-crowned or
girdled) Kythereia because she reached Kythera, and Kyprogenes because
she was born in billowy Kypros, and Philommeides (Genital-Loving)
because sprang from the members. And with her went Eros (Love), and
comely Himeros (Desire) followed her at her birth at the first and as
she went into the assembly of the gods. This honour she has from the
beginning, and this is the portion allotted to her amongst men and
undying gods, - the whisperings of maidens and smiles and deceits with
sweet delight and love and graciousness." - Hesiod, Theogony 176

"To Sea-set Kypros the moist breath of the western wind wafted her
[Aphrodite] over the waves of the loud-moaning sea in soft foam, and
there the gold-filleted Horai welcomed her joyously. They clothed her
with heavenly garments: on her head they put a fine, well-wrought
crown of gold, and in her pierced ears they hung ornaments of orichalc
and precious gold, and adorned her with golden necklaces over her soft
neck and snow-white breasts, jewels which the gold-filleted Horai wear
themselves whenever they go to their father's house to join the lovely
dances of the gods. And when they had fully decked her, they brought
her to the gods, who welcomed her when they saw her, giving her their
hands. Each one of them prayed that he might lead her home to be his
wedded wife, so greatly were they amazed at the beauty of
violet-crowned Kythereia." - Homeric Hymns 6 to Aphrodite

In ancient Greece, today was celebrated as the birth of Aphrodite,
known to the Romans as Venus. According to Hesiod (Theogony 188-198),
when Kronos had cut off his father's members, he tossed them into the
sea. The immortal flesh eventually spread into a circle of white
foam... from this foam, Aphrodite was created. Her name literally
means foam-born. She was attended by Eros and Himeros when she was
first born but when she stepped ashore on the island of Kypros she was
a "modest and lovely Goddess", since known as the Lady of Kypros. Her
gentle domain was intended to be "the sweetness of love" and "the
whispering of girls" but her adventures, and the adventures of her
children, caused as much misery and bloodshed as any of the immortals
--- except for Ares (Mars) and Athene (Athena), who thrived on warfare.

Aphrodite was born fully grown out of the foam, and as such is of an
older generation than Zeus. The Iliad (Book V) expresses another
version of her origin, by which she was considered a daughter of
Dione, who was the original oracular goddess ("Dione" being simply
"the goddess," etymologically an equivalent of "Diana") at Dodona. In
Homer, Aphrodite, venturing into battle to protect her son, Aeneas,
who has been wounded by Diomedes and returns to her mother, to sink
down at her knee and be comforted. "Dione" seems to be an equivalent
of Rhea, the Earth Mother, whom Homer has relocated to Olympus. After
this story, Aphrodite herself was sometimes referred to as "Dione".
Once Zeus had usurped the oak-grove oracle at Dodona, some poets made
him out to be the father of Aphrodite.

Aphrodite's chief center of worship remained at Paphos, on the
south-western coast of Cyprus, where the goddess of desire had long
been worshipped as Ishtar and Ashtaroth. It is said that she first
tentatively came ashore at Cytherea, a stopping place for trade and
culture between Crete and the Peloponesus. Thus perhaps we have hints
of the track of Aphrodite's original cult from the Levant to mainland
Greece. In Plato's Symposium the speech of Pausanias distinguishes
two manifestations of Aphrodite, represented by the two stories:
Aphrodite Ourania ("heavenly" Aphrodite), and Aphrodite Pandemos
("Common" Aphrodite). These two manifestations represented her role in
homosexuality and heterosexuality, respectively.

Venus was originally a vegetation goddess and patroness of gardens and
vineyards. Later, under Greek influence, she was equated with
Aphrodite and assumed many of her aspects. The oldest temple known of
Venus dates back to 293 B.C., and was inaugurated on August 18. Later,
on this date the Vinalia Rustica was observed. A second festival, that
of the Veneralia, was celebrated on April 1 in honor of Venus
Verticordia, who later became the protector against vice. Her temple
was built in 114 B.C. After the Roman defeat near Lake Trasum in 215
B.C., a temple was built on the Capitol for Venus Erycina. This temple
was officially opened on April 23, and a festival, the Vinalia Priora,
was instituted to celebrate the occasion.


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Wikipedia, Encyclopedia Mythica, Hesiod
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48960 From: l_fidelius_graecus Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Re: De censorum edicto
Salve Apolloni Corde, et Salvete Omnes,

As you are a well respected member of Nova Roma, I would always
hesitate to disagree with you, and in this case I agree with you
more than you know. However it's good to keep in mind that Nova Roma
isn't actually Roman. I'm aware that many wouldn't believe that- and
this I think stems from that they don't *want* to believe it. The
bottom line is that ancient Rome, especially in the republican
period, was strictly patriarchical. Stepping away from any
historical context- a patriarchical society generally is one that
does not apologize, though when functioning properly it does step in
to make amends where they are needed. In the latter sense, NR does
exhibit that spirit as evidenced by the edicto and in the general
run of things of late which I've been very impressed with.

My response is also directed at some other posts we've seen lately
as well which are generally phrased as "If Roma did a thing this
way, why does Nova Roma do this thing another way?" and what I've
given here is the simple answer to a host of such questions. Nova
Roma has been made, at least a large extent, to serve the needs of
(so-called) neopagans. There was no such a thing in ancient time-
Rome was made and administered to serve ancient Romans and their
beliefs which are even today coming to light- so there will always
be some difference to what's found here. That is the diplomatic
answer- specific reasons for distinctions seem to have specific
reasonings, though these are usually up to the individual to seek
out.

In closing, I agree with you heartily. Nothing Roman needs
apologizing for- though in my experience, not everything here is
Roman. I hope that clarifies something for someone.

Vale, et valete bene,
L. Fidelius Graecus




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@...> wrote:
>
> A. Apollonius omnibus sal.
>
> I heartily a somewhat belatedly welcome this edictum of the
censores. I only wish to add a little note which is not intended as
a criticism of the censores but merely as a small contribution to
our ongoing effort to think and behave in a more Roman way.
>
> The censores wrote, "We hereby issue an official apology to Lucius
Marius Fimbria on behalf of the Office of the Censores of Nova
Roma". I respectfully suggest that this is not a very Roman thing
to do.
>
> My point is not that Romans never apologized. It's actually true
that they very rarely did, but that's not the point here. The point
is that the censores have apologized not for something *they* did,
but for something their predecessors in office did.
>
> In the modern world we are used to thinking of certain jobs and
offices as having some sort of continuous and independent existence
which has nothing to do with the individuals who hold those jobs and
offices. In Anglo-American legal terminology we talk about
a "corporation sole". European monarchs (those few who are left)
are corporations sole: in the U.K., for example, the Queen is not
merely an individual who happens to be Queen but the holder of an
office - "the Crown" - which exists independently of herself, which
existed before she was born, and which will exist after she dies.
The Crown is a continuous entity with its own legal powers and
duties, and it is really immaterial who happens to be doing the job
at any given moment. Queen Elizabeth II is, for most legal
purposes, the same person as King George VI before her, and King
Edward VIII before him, and so on. Similarly we have commercial
companies which continue to exist independently of their employees,
managers, directors, &c. The company may be held financially
responsible for something which it "did", so to speak, fifty years
ago, even though all the people who actually made the relevant
decisions and carried out the relevant orders are no longer working
for the company at all. Even though the person who happens to be
King, or the person who happens to run the company, may die and it
may be a little while before the next person comes in to take over
the job, the Crown continues to exist uninterrupted, as does the
company.
>
> The Romans did not, by and large, think in this way. There are
exceptions, especially with regard to families. But they certainly
did not think in this way about political offices. This year's
consules are not in any sense the same legal entities as last year's
consules. The consulate has no existence independent of its
holders. "Consul" is not a legal person, it is just a title and a
set of powers and duties which attach to a particular person. If by
some mischance there is no consul, the consulate ceases to exist.
Its powers and duties are dispersed among various other people and
bodies. And, most importantly in this case, this year's consules
are in no sense responsible for things done by previous consules.
They cannot take credit for them, and they cannot be blamed for
them. The same is true of all magistrates, and indeed it is
especially so for the censores, since their office was actually
vacant for three and a half out of every five years and most
certainly did not exist in any abstract sense during those periods
of vacancy.
>
> So it really not within the power of our censores, much though
they may wish to, to apologize for things done by previous
censores. They cannot apologize of behalf "the office of the
censores" because this is not an entity which has any continuous
existence. If by "office" they mean "job" or "magistracy" then, as
I've already said, this magistracy does not exist independently of
the censores themselves, and they cannot apologize on behalf of it.
If by "office of the censores" they mean "body of staff working for
the censores" then this, too, has no independent existence, because
each censor's staff is merely an assemblage of people appointed by
him for the duration of his magistracy. It ceases to exist when he
leaves office, and the staff assembled by his successor is a
different entity, even if it may contain some or even all of the
same people. If we look at this from a Roman perspective, we must
conclude that the censores can only meaningfully apologize for
things which they themselves have done. If anyone is to apologize
for a nota imposed on L. Marius, it must be the people who were
censores when it was imposed.
>
> None of this is, of course, meant to detract from the sincerity of
the censores' statement. Clearly what they mean is that they think
their predecessors acted wrongly and they wish to assure Marius that
they do not support that act. That is a fine sentiment and finely
said. It was merely expressed in a way which is not really in tune
with a Roman view of the world.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48961 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui<
Salve Luci Iuni,

Apology accepted. Thank you.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS

Lucius Iunius Bassus <iunius_verbosus@...> writes:

> L. Iunius Bassus Cn. Marino Censorio sal.
>
> Gnae Marine, I want to apologize for the tone of my response to you
> earlier. [...]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48962 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Attention Custodes and Diribitores
L. Arminius Faustus CSL to all custodes and diribitores,

The people (and specially the censor) are awaiting the results of the
last Comitia Populi. I understand since there was just one candidate,
there was no hurry, but the legal time is going over.

Please, send me the results as soon as possible.

--
Valete bene in pacem deorum,
L. Arminius Faustus CSL

"Vigilando, agendo, bene consulendo, prospera omnia cedunt" - Salustius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48963 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Re: Attention Custodes and Diribitores
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Arminio Fausto salutem dicit

I looked back through my e-mails from this list and didn't see anything
indicating voting was open. The only thing I saw was the initial e-mail
from January 17th indicating voting would start on the 23rd. In the future
it might be a good idea to send out a reminder that voting has started. I
try to keep up to date on important things going on but sometimes I loose
track of dates and such.

Just a friendly reminder.

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Censor

On 2/6/07, Lucius Arminius Faustus <lafaustus@...> wrote:
>
> L. Arminius Faustus CSL to all custodes and diribitores,
>
> The people (and specially the censor) are awaiting the results of the
> last Comitia Populi. I understand since there was just one candidate,
> there was no hurry, but the legal time is going over.
>
> Please, send me the results as soon as possible.
>
> --
> Valete bene in pacem deorum,
> L. Arminius Faustus CSL
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48964 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2007-02-06
Subject: Calendarius Nundinalis V
Q. Caecilius Metellus Quiritibus salutem.

For the coming nundinum, beginning today, the calendar will be thus as
decreed by the Collegium Pontificum:

a.d. VII Id. Feb., Fastus
a.d. VI Id. Feb., Nefastus
a.d. V Id. Feb., Nefastus
a.d. IV Id. Feb., Nefastus
a.d. III Id. Feb., Nefastus
pr. Id. Feb., Nefastus
Id. Feb., Nefastus Publicus
a.d. XVI Kal. Mar., Nefastus
a.d. XV Kal. Mar., Nefastus Publicus

The feriae publicae stativae to be observed during this period are:

Virgo Vestalis Parentat (Id. Feb.)
Lupercalia (a.d. XV Kal. Mar.)

For more information on the character of the days, please reference
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Responsum_Pontificum_de_Diebus_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Roman_Calendar
or, as always, you can send a private message to me.

Optime Valete in Pace Deorum,

QVINTVS·CAECILIVS·L·F·SAB·METELLVS·POSTVMIANVS
PONTIFEX
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48965 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-07
Subject: a.d. VII Id. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem VII Idus Februarius; haec dies nefastus est.

"The Veientes and Fidenates, who inhabited large and populous cities,
had in the reign of Romulus engaged in a war with the Romans for
command and sovereignty, and after losing many armies in the course of
the war and being punished by the loss of part of their territory,
they had been forced to become subjects of the conquerors; concerning
which I have given a precise account in the preceding Book. But
having enjoyed an uninterrupted peace during the reign of Numa
Pompilius, they had greatly increased in population, wealth and every
other form of prosperity. Elated, therefore, by these advantages, they
again aspired to freedom, assumed a bolder spirit and prepared to
yield obedience to the Romans no longer. For a time, indeed, their
intention of revolting remained undiscovered, but during the Alban war
it became manifest. For when they learned that the Romans had marched
out with all their forces to engaged the Albans, they thought that
they had now got the most favourable opportunity for their attack, and
through their most influential men they entered into a secret
conspiracy. It was arranged that all who were capable of bearing arms
should assemble in Fidenae, going secretly, a few at a time, so as to
escape as far as possible the notice of to against whom the plot was
aimed, and should remain there awaiting the moment when the armies of
the Romans and Albans should quit their camps and march out to battle,
the actual time to be indicated to them by means of signals given by
some scouts posted on the mountains; and as soon as the signals were
raised they were all to take arms and advance in haste against the
combatants (the road leading from Fidenae to the camps was not a long
one, but only a march of two or three hours at most), and appearing on
the battlefield at the time when presumably the conflict would be
over, they were to regard neither side as friends, but whether the
Romans or the Albans had won, were to slay the victors. This was the
plan of action on which the chiefs of those cities had determined.
If, therefore, the Albans, in their contempt for the Romans, had
rushed more boldly into an engagement and had resolved to stake
everything upon the issue of a single battle, nothing could have
hindered the treachery contrived against them from remaining secret
and both their armies from being destroyed. But as it was, their delay
in beginning war, contrary to all expectations, and the length of time
they employed in making their preparations were bringing their foes'
plans to nought. For some of the conspirators, either seeking to
compass their private advantage or envying their leaders and those who
had been the authors of the undertaking or fearing that others might
lay information — a thing which has often happened in conspiracies
where there are many accomplices and the execution is long delayed —
or being compelled by the will of Heaven, which could not consent that
a wicked design should meet with success, informed their enemies of
the treachery." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus 3.6



"Muses, sweet-speaking daughters of Zeus Kronides and mistresses of
song, sing next of long-winged Moon! From her immortal head a
heaven-sent glow envelops the earth and great beauty arises under its
radiance. From her golden crown the dim air is made to glitter as her
rays turn night to noon, whenever bright Selene, having bathed her
beautiful skin in the Ocean, put on her shining rainment and harnessed
her proud-necked and glittering steeds, swiftly drives them on as
their manes play with the evening, dividing the months. Her great
orbit is full and as she waxes a most brilliant light appears in the
sky. Thus to mortals she is a sign and a token." - Homer, Hymn to Selene 2

In ancient Greece, today was dedicated to the goddess Selene. She
represents the full moon phase of the lunar cycle, along with Artemis
(the crescent new moon) and Hecate (the waning moon). Like her brother
Helius, she drives a chariot through the sky each night; hers is
usually drawn by two horses. By Zeus, she is the mother of Pandia
(All-bright) and Ersa (Dew). By Endymion, she is the mother of fifty
daughters, who represent the fifty lunar months that elapse between
each Olympiad. The days of the full and new moon were set aside for
her worship. Endymion was a beautiful shepherd boy of Asia Minor, the
mortal lover of the moon goddess Selene. Each night he was kissed to
sleep by her. She begged Zeus to grant him eternal life so she might
be able to embrace him forever. Endymion was allowed to choose what
he would, and he chose to sleep for ever, remaining deathless and
ageless. Zeus granted his wish. Every night Selene visits him on Mt.
Latmus.

In Rome, Luna ("moon") had a temple on the Aventine Hill. It was built
in the 6th century B.C. but was destroyed in the Great Fire of Rome
under Nero.


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Wikipedia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48966 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-02-07
Subject: MMP Collegium for 2760 a.U.c
SALVETE OMNES !

This is MMP Collegium for the year 2760 a.U.c

- Franciscus Apulus Caesar - Editorial assistant.
- Pompeia Minucia Strabo - Fundraising assistant.
- Caius Curius Saturninus - Producer assistant.
- Marcus Moravius Horatianus Piscinus - Religious assistant.
- Marcus Lucretius Agricola - Wiki assistant.
- Publius Memmius Albucius - Juridical assistant.
- Gnaeus Equitius Marinus - Historical assistant.
- Caeso Fabio Buteo Quintilianus - Historical assistant.
- Gnaeus Iulius Caesar - Historical assistant.
- Marcus Iulius Perusianus - Historical assistant.

Legal base : Edictum Aedilicium de Collegio Situs Interretialis
Perpetui Magnae Matris Instituendo.

VALETE,
IVL SABINVS
MMP Project Coordinator.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48967 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2007-02-07
Subject: Constitutional Duties of the Tribunis Plebis
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus S.P.D.

As a candidate for the office of Tribune of the Plebeians, I believe
that it is important for all of our citizens to understand what the
duties of this office are according to the current Nova Roman
Constitution & how I interpret those duties and obligations.

"7. Tribuni Plebis (Tribune of the Plebs). Five tribunes of the plebs
shall be elected by the comitia plebis tributa to serve a term
lasting one year. They must all be of the plebeian order, and shall
have the following honors, powers, and obligations:
[7.]a. To pronounce intercessio (intercession; a veto) against the
actions of any other magistrate (with the exception of the dictator
and the interrex), Senatus consulta, magisterial edicta, religious
decreta, and leges passed by the comitia when the spirit and / or
letter of this Constitution or legally-enacted edicta or decreta,
Senatus Consulta or leges are being violated thereby; once a
pronouncement of intercessio has been made, the other Tribunes may,
at their discretion, state either their support for or their
disagreement with that intercessio.

FGA: This section is clear but leaves the interpretation of what
violates ". . . the spirit and/or letter of . . ." the Nova Roman
Constitution, edicta, decreta, Senatus Consulta, or leges to the
individual Tribunes. I do not believe that the citizens of Nova Roma
want a Tribune who will throw out an intercessio based exclusively on
personal opinion alone. I do believe that a wise Tribune should
consult with his or her colleagues privately to determine if indeed
an intercessio is warranted. Also, an intercessio might be
unnecessary if the Tribunes can convince the magistrate or other
official that they should withdraw their action. A tribune should
never stir up trouble over a matter that is merely under discussion
or can be dealt with by active communication.

"1. Each Tribune may issue only one such declaration of support or
disagreement, but may change their declaration from one to the other,
should they wish to do so.
2. The initial pronouncement of intercessio by a Tribune shall count
as that Tribune's declaration of agreement.
3. Should the number or the Tribunes who choose to disagree with an
intercessio equal or exceed the number of Tribunes who choose to
support it, the intercessio shall be revoked.

FGA: Here is another example of where it is a very good idea to
consult with the other Tribunes to determine whether an intercessio
may be warranted. An intercessio is one of the most powerful tools
in Nova Roma whick makes a declaration not only against a
magistrate's alleged illegal action but against the magistrate's
dignitas. A Tribune who acts too hastily without clarification and
communication with the other Tribunes may offend not only the
magistrate but also his or her colleagues. This can make a minor
disruption into an all out battle on the mainlist.

"[3.]a. Intercessio may not be imposed against statements of support
for or disagreement with a use of intercessio that are issued
pursuant to the preceding paragraph.
[3.]b. The issuance and function of intercessio shall be defined
according to procedures described by legislation passed by Comitia.
[7.]b. To pronounce intercessio (intercession; a veto) against
another Tribune using the same mechanism as described in paragraph
IV. A. 7. a. above;
[7.]c. To be immune from intercessio pronounced by other magistrates,
except as described in paragraphs IV. A. 7 .a. and IV. A. 7. b. above;

FGA: Here is a section that clearly states that a Tribune should not
use the power of intercessio against mere discussion or debate but
only against a blantant violation of the NR Constitution, leges,
decreta, consulta, or edicta. If two Tribunes are discussing a
course of action on the NR or CPT lists it would show they are not
using their powers lightly. It is my opinion that communication,
both private and public, should be the first course of action that a
Tribune should engage in before invoking an intercessio.

"[7.]d. To be privy to the debates of the Senate, and keep the
citizens informed as to the subjects and results thereof, in such
manner and subject to such restrictions as may be defined by law;
1. To call the Senate to order;

FGA: This is the guarantee that all the citizens of Nova Roma will
know when the Senate is called to order and what are the results of
the Senate's action. Plus, I also view this section as placing the
Tribune under the obligation of letting the Senate know the views of
the Plebs and the other orders on a particular subject (should they
be unaware of discussions on the CPT list).

2. To call the comitia plebis tributa to order, except when the
Patrician order shall constitute more than ten percent (10%) of the
total population, in which case the power shall be altered to calling
the comitia populi tributa to order;
3. To administer the law;

FGA: I cannot state strongly enough that I believe every citizen of
Nova Roma should study our Constitution and leges so they can offer
effective opinions to their elected magistrates. I interpret the
word "administer" to mean "support" the laws of Nova Roma and insure
that the power of intercessio is used wisely and prudently.

4. To appoint scribae (clerks) to assist with administrative and
other tasks, as they shall see fit.

FGA: We have a number of scribae in Nova Roma but I would only
appoint such scribae as are absolutely necessary AND also interested
in learning about the administration of Nova Roma so they could be
good, well-informed magistrates, in the future.

Well, there are some of my opinions about the office of Tribune. I
realize that some will interpret my views as being too cautious
compared to other tribunes but I would prefer to be known as moderate
rather than hot-headed or reckless. I consider myself as someone who
recognizes that Nova Roma needs to strike a balance between the
traditional practices of Old Rome and the modern world in which we
were raised. Most of the modern virtues and practices that I
experienced growing up are based on the solid Roman virtues plus a
good sense of humor.

Valete.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48968 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2007-02-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORUM DE NOTA IN LUCIUM MARIUM FIMBRIAM
Salvete Omnes,

It has been brought to my attention that some have read the repudiation
of the Nota, now rescinded, as a rebuke of the actions of the Consul
who was active at that time. Such was not our intent; the condemnation
was of the Nota, which was the first major action in a battle that
fractured our society, and does not extend to any actions of the
Consul.

I have met Consul M. Minucius Audens and know him to be a person of high
virtue and integrity. I believe he acted honourably and without malice
in all of his activities that year, as did most of the Senate.

I apologize for any confusion that may have arisen.

Valete, M. Octavius Gracchus, Censor.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com

-"Apes don't read philosophy."
-"Yes they do, Otto, they just don't understand it! Let me correct
you on a few things: Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of
Buddhism is not 'every man for himself'. And the London Underground is
not a political movement! Those are all mistakes. I looked them up."
-from "A Fish Called Wanda"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48969 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Re: De censorum edicto
M. Hortensia L. Fidelius spd;
I read your post below with a sort of amazement at 1) the
historical inaccuracies 2) the sheer rudeness of your post

Since Cordus is busy with law school permit me to reply with some
history and a few facts.

1. Your supposition is absurd. We have many cives at this moment
residing in the urbs of Italia. They indeed are Roman. And those of
us who come together to follow Romanitas are also Roman. Do you have
to be born at the time of Jesus to qualify as a *real* Christian?

Your discussion of patriarchy is bizarre..By the late Republic -
Early Empire Roman women had many legal rights and were extremely
free: to divorce, contract, inherit, sue in court. They could run
businesses, travel, take lovers, use birth control, have abortions
on demand, remarry, gamble, go to the Circus. It would take until
the 20th Century in Europe & America for women to reach this same
state of affairs. So I suggest you pick up a history book.

2) Nova Roma was founded to return the Pax Deorum which rested on
the cultus deorum. Those of us who follow the religio call ourselves
cultores.
You are the 'pagan' the yokel, the rube, to use the rude
terms 'so-called' neo-pagans.' Asatru, Hellenismos, the Religio are
all examples of reconstructionist religions.
There are indeed pagans & neo-pagans & happily use this label
which is fine. They are not 'so-called' just as you are not a 'so-
called Christian' That would be quite rude.

4) Nova Roma's reason for being is to embody the best of Republican
Rome. To quote my friend A. Apollonius Cordus; the Romans were very
conservative but also very pragmatic.
We then try to follow the past as closely as possible making
changes that are pragmatic & sensible.
easy examples are no slavery & full civic rights & political
offices held by women.

My good friend Senator C. Curius Saturninus of Academia Thules is
giving a course on Roman History this spring. I suggest you sign up
for it asap!
bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior
producer "Vox Romana" podcast
http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/
Candidate for Tribune of the Plebs

1) However it's good to keep in mind that Nova Roma
> isn't actually Roman. I'm aware that many wouldn't believe that-
and
> this I think stems from that they don't *want* to believe it. The
> bottom line is that ancient Rome, especially in the republican
> period, was strictly patriarchical. Stepping away from any
> historical context- a patriarchical society generally is one that
> does not apologize, though when functioning properly it does step
in
> to make amends where they are needed. In the latter sense, NR does
> exhibit that spirit as evidenced by the edicto and in the general
> run of things of late which I've been very impressed with.
>
>
My response is also directed at some other posts we've seen lately
> as well which are generally phrased as "If Roma did a thing this
> way, why does Nova Roma do this thing another way?" and what I've
> given here is the simple answer to a host of such questions.

2.)Nova
> Roma has been made, at least a large extent, to serve the needs of
> (so-called) neopagans. There was no such a thing in ancient time-
> Rome was made and administered to serve ancient Romans and their
> beliefs which are even today coming to light- so there will always
> be some difference to what's found here. That is the diplomatic
> answer- specific reasons for distinctions seem to have specific
> reasonings, though these are usually up to the individual to seek
> out.
>
> In closing, I agree with you heartily. Nothing Roman needs
> apologizing for- though in my experience, not everything here is
> Roman. I hope that clarifies something for someone.
>
> Vale, et valete bene,
> L. Fidelius Graecus
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
> <a_apollonius_cordus@> wrote:
> >
> > A. Apollonius omnibus sal.
> >
> > I heartily a somewhat belatedly welcome this edictum of the
> censores. I only wish to add a little note which is not intended
as
> a criticism of the censores but merely as a small contribution to
> our ongoing effort to think and behave in a more Roman way.
> >
> > The censores wrote, "We hereby issue an official apology to
Lucius
> Marius Fimbria on behalf of the Office of the Censores of Nova
> Roma". I respectfully suggest that this is not a very Roman thing
> to do.
> >
> > My point is not that Romans never apologized. It's actually
true
> that they very rarely did, but that's not the point here. The
point
> is that the censores have apologized not for something *they* did,
> but for something their predecessors in office did.
> >
> > In the modern world we are used to thinking of certain jobs and
> offices as having some sort of continuous and independent
existence
> which has nothing to do with the individuals who hold those jobs
and
> offices. In Anglo-American legal terminology we talk about
> a "corporation sole". European monarchs (those few who are left)
> are corporations sole: in the U.K., for example, the Queen is not
> merely an individual who happens to be Queen but the holder of an
> office - "the Crown" - which exists independently of herself,
which
> existed before she was born, and which will exist after she dies.
> The Crown is a continuous entity with its own legal powers and
> duties, and it is really immaterial who happens to be doing the
job
> at any given moment. Queen Elizabeth II is, for most legal
> purposes, the same person as King George VI before her, and King
> Edward VIII before him, and so on. Similarly we have commercial
> companies which continue to exist independently of their
employees,
> managers, directors, &c. The company may be held financially
> responsible for something which it "did", so to speak, fifty years
> ago, even though all the people who actually made the relevant
> decisions and carried out the relevant orders are no longer
working
> for the company at all. Even though the person who happens to be
> King, or the person who happens to run the company, may die and it
> may be a little while before the next person comes in to take over
> the job, the Crown continues to exist uninterrupted, as does the
> company.
> >
> > The Romans did not, by and large, think in this way. There are
> exceptions, especially with regard to families. But they
certainly
> did not think in this way about political offices. This year's
> consules are not in any sense the same legal entities as last
year's
> consules. The consulate has no existence independent of its
> holders. "Consul" is not a legal person, it is just a title and a
> set of powers and duties which attach to a particular person. If
by
> some mischance there is no consul, the consulate ceases to exist.
> Its powers and duties are dispersed among various other people and
> bodies. And, most importantly in this case, this year's consules
> are in no sense responsible for things done by previous consules.
> They cannot take credit for them, and they cannot be blamed for
> them. The same is true of all magistrates, and indeed it is
> especially so for the censores, since their office was actually
> vacant for three and a half out of every five years and most
> certainly did not exist in any abstract sense during those periods
> of vacancy.
> >
> > So it really not within the power of our censores, much though
> they may wish to, to apologize for things done by previous
> censores. They cannot apologize of behalf "the office of the
> censores" because this is not an entity which has any continuous
> existence. If by "office" they mean "job" or "magistracy" then,
as
> I've already said, this magistracy does not exist independently of
> the censores themselves, and they cannot apologize on behalf of
it.
> If by "office of the censores" they mean "body of staff working
for
> the censores" then this, too, has no independent existence,
because
> each censor's staff is merely an assemblage of people appointed by
> him for the duration of his magistracy. It ceases to exist when
he
> leaves office, and the staff assembled by his successor is a
> different entity, even if it may contain some or even all of the
> same people. If we look at this from a Roman perspective, we must
> conclude that the censores can only meaningfully apologize for
> things which they themselves have done. If anyone is to apologize
> for a nota imposed on L. Marius, it must be the people who were
> censores when it was imposed.
> >
> > None of this is, of course, meant to detract from the sincerity
of
> the censores' statement. Clearly what they mean is that they
think
> their predecessors acted wrongly and they wish to assure Marius
that
> they do not support that act. That is a fine sentiment and finely
> said. It was merely expressed in a way which is not really in
tune
> with a Roman view of the world.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48970 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORUM DE NOTA IN LUCIUM MARIUM FIMBRIAM
Ah, the dictates of politics. We know Audens, and we know you Octavius, and we love you
both. What a sensitive lot we can be. I'm as guilty as the next man, and more guilty than
the two after him. I know I'm not the only one here who regrets his role in over-reacting
to too much.

Vale

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Octavius Gracchus" <hucke@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> It has been brought to my attention that some have read the repudiation
> of the Nota, now rescinded, as a rebuke of the actions of the Consul
> who was active at that time. Such was not our intent; the condemnation
> was of the Nota, which was the first major action in a battle that
> fractured our society, and does not extend to any actions of the
> Consul.
>
> I have met Consul M. Minucius Audens and know him to be a person of high
> virtue and integrity. I believe he acted honourably and without malice
> in all of his activities that year, as did most of the Senate.
>
> I apologize for any confusion that may have arisen.
>
> Valete, M. Octavius Gracchus, Censor.
>
> --
> Marcus Octavius Gracchus
> octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com
>
> -"Apes don't read philosophy."
> -"Yes they do, Otto, they just don't understand it! Let me correct
> you on a few things: Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of
> Buddhism is not 'every man for himself'. And the London Underground is
> not a political movement! Those are all mistakes. I looked them up."
> -from "A Fish Called Wanda"
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48971 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: a.d. VI Id. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem VI Idus Februarius; haec dies nefastus est.

"These were the reasons urged by the two generals to support the
pretensions of their respective cities to the supremacy; and the
outcome of the discussion was the adoption of the plan Tullius
proposed. For both the Albans and Romans who were present at the
conference, in their desire to put a speedy end to the war, resolved
to decide the controversy by arms. This also being agreed to, the
question arose concerning the number of the combatants, since the two
generals were not of the same mind. For Tullius desired that the
fate of the war might be decided by the smallest possible number of
combatants, the most distinguished man among the Albans fighting the
bravest of the Romans in single combat, and he cheerfully offered
himself to fight for his own country, inviting the Alban leader to
emulate him. He pointed out that for those who have assumed the
command of armies combats for sovereignty and power are glorious, not
only when they conquer brave men, but also when they are conquered by
the brave; and he enumerated all the generals and kings who had risked
their lives for their country, regarding it as a reproach to them to
have a greater share of the honours than others but a smaller share of
the dangers. The Alban, however, while approving of the proposal to
commit the fate of the cities to a few champions, would not agree to
decide it by single combat. He owned that when commanders of the
armies were seeking to establish their own power a combat between them
for the supremacy was noble and necessary, but when states themselves
were contending for the first place he thought the risk of single
combat not only hazardous but even dishonourable, whether they met
with good or ill fortune. And he proposed that three chosen men
p55from each city should fight in the presence of all the Albans and
Romans, declaring that this was the most suitable number for deciding
any matter in controversy, as containing in itself a beginning, a
middle and an end. This proposal meeting with the approval of both
Romans and Albans, the conference broke up and each side returned to
its own camp.

After this the generals assembled their respective armies and gave
them an account both of what they had said to each other and of the
terms upon which they had agreed to put an end to the war. And both
armies having with great approbation ratified the agreement entered
into by their generals, there arose a wonderful emulation among the
officers and soldiers alike, since a great many were eager to carry
off the prize of valour in the combat and expressed their emulation
not only by their words but also by their actions, so that their
leaders found great difficulty in selecting the most suitable
champions. For if anyone was renowned for his illustrious ancestry or
remarkable for his strength of body, famous for some brave dee in
action, or distinguished by some other good fortune or bold
achievement, he insisted upon being chosen first among the three
champions. This emulation, which was running to great lengths in both
armies, was checked by the Alban general, who called to mind that some
divine providence, long since foreseeing this conflict between the two
cities, had arranged that their future champions should be sprung of
no obscure families and should be brave in arms, most comely in
appearance, and distinguished from the generality of mankind by their
birth, which should be unusual and wonderful because of its
extraordinary nature. 4It seems that Sicinius, an Alban, had at one
and the same time married his twin daughters to Horatius, a Roman, and
to Curiatius, an Alban; and the two wives came with child at the same
time and each was brought to bed, at her first lying-in, of three male
children. The parents, looking upon the event as a happy omen both to
their cities and families, brought up all these children till they
arrived at manhood. And Heaven, as I said in the beginning, gave them
beauty and strength and nobility of mind, so that they were not
inferior to any of those most highly endowed by Nature. It was to
these men that Fufetius resolved to commit the combat for supremacy;
and having invited the Roman king to a conference, he addressed him as
follows..." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus 3.12-13


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48972 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Slavery in Roman Society
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

SLAVERY

If modern society frowns on the use of slavery, then what needs to be
considered is that Rome followed in teh footsteps of the ancient
civilizations which had gone before it and who had all used slave
labour. It was hence understood as quite a normal thing for the
vanquished to be taken into slavery, or to purchase slaves from the
barbarian realms.

The ancient Egypt had used slaves at least two and a half thousand
years before the Romans, then also the Babylonians, Indians, Chinese,
Persians and Greeks employed slavery as a normal part of their
societies. And the fact that slavery continued in the west for as long
as the nineteenth century on American plantations - and that in other
parts of the world it still exists today - shows that Rome was merely
one period in a truly long lasting tradition. Questions could also be
asked if many 'employed' poor of 19th century Britain could perhaps be
described as little more than slaves.

However, it can be said that the Romans, from roughly 200 BC onwards,
based much of their society on the exploitation of slavery. Their
economic systems became heavily dependent on the widespread existence
of slave labor. Slaves labored in the mines and in the empire's many
farms and potteries. The state's public works were largely completed
and maintained by slaves, and the government's state bureaucracy
depended very much on educated slaves to keep the administration of
the empire running. Even key institutions like the state's mints or
the distribution of the corn dole to poor Romans depended on slaves.
Other educated slaves also kept the private industries going, by
functioning as their accountants and clerks; and vital services were
provided by literate slaves who served as teachers, librarians,
scribes, artists and entertainers - even doctors.

In the private houses of Rome, it was slaves who were the servants of
their Roman masters, watching over their private lives. From the man
who cleaned the sewers to the emperor's scribe, slaves were an
essential part of Roman society. In the latter centuries of the Roman
empire, slavery began gradually to decrease in importance, as the rise
of Christianity demanded more benevolence, and - no less importantly -
the supply of slaves began to dwindle.

Had the early Romans been content with a small number of household
slaves, these numbers rose steeply with Rome's increasing wealth.
Simple tasks, such as the master's bath, would require the attendance
of more than one slave. A slave was used to take the children to
school. In households of the rich where their was many slaves, they
were divided into groups of ten, each under orders of a foreman. The
running of the household was in some homes left in the hands of a
freed slave, the so-called procurator (in earlier days he was called
the atriensis). Even those Romans with very moderate means expected to
be well served, taken at least three slaves with them to the baths.
Not to have one slave was a sign of the most degrading poverty.

Slaves used for industrial purposes were generally divided into gangs.
These gangs were closed groups of specialist workers who tended to
work as a unit and were generally not split up again. Provincial
tax-collectors, especially those in Asia Minor (Turkey), often acted
as suppliers of slaves from the provinces, transporting them to the
provincial slave markets from where they would purchased by wholesale
buyers who'd most likely ship them back to Rome for sale. One of the
largest such wholesale market was known to be on the island of Delos
in the Aegean Sea and possessed a capacity for as many as 10,000 slaves.

The acquiring of slaves through conquest was common practice among all
the civilizations of the ancient world and Rome was no exception.
Iulius Caesar, having captured a town in Gaul, sold on the spot the
entire population of a district of the place to the salve traders who
accompanied his army. Once all were counted the slavers walked away
with no less than 53,000 people.

Up to the days of Augustus, a marriage between a slave needed not be
recognized by its master and enjoyed no protection in law. The
children of such a couple would be born as slaves. A slave who ran
away would face branding or possibly even death. The treatment of
slaves was totally in the hands of the owner, and usually varied
according to their abilities. Some among them were trained as skilled
fighters to perform as gladiators in the arena. And it was at one of
those gladiator schools in Capua that the famous revolt of Spartacus
arose in 73 BC. If the gladiators' lot was cruel, then others too had
a pitiful existence. Farm slave gangs would have to work in the fields
in chains, and were locked up each night in barracks.

But not all slaves in the countryside necessarily had such a terribly
existence. Herdsmen for example, of which there were very many, were
granted reasonable independence as they went about their lives,
watching over the herds they were entrusted with. Some Romans would
even see the raising of slaves as a form of investment. Cato the Elder
bought young slaves whom he would then have trained in various skills,
so he could sell them on later at a profit. It was also from Cato's
writings that one knows of his opinion that twelve slaves - a foreman
and eleven workers - were deemed sufficient to run a farm of some 150
acres, which would grow olives and rear sheep.

The abundance of slavery is also seen as having hampered technological
advances in many industries, not least agriculture. For with the
existence of so plentiful supply of labor at almost no cost, there was
little reason to develop any forms of labor saving equipment.

Under the supervision of the aediles the slave dealers sold their
wares publicly, either in the open forum or in shops. Slaves for sale
would sometimes be stood on revolving stands. Those just brought from
abroad were put on display with one foot whitened with chalk. From the
neck of each slave for sale hung a plaque with all the information
required by potential buyers, nationality, abilities, good and bad
points, etc.

The best slaves were to be found in the saepta near the forum, the
meeting place of the fashionable world, where the best shops were.
Naturally, prices varied with the age and quality of the slave.
There are records of fabulous sums being paid, as well as very small
prices. One evidently particularly talented teacher of grammar
(grammaticus) is supposed to have fetched 700'000 sesterces, a fortune.

But such excessive prices were rare. By general rule a slave at some
skill was worth twelve times as much as an untrained one.
Intelligence and learning were the attributes which elevated the price
of a slave the most. Next came good looks and skills at various types
of work. But also mentally retarded, dwarfed or disfigured slaves
could fetch high prices by buyers seeking 'jesters' for their own
cruel amusement.

Some slaves could buy their freedom. This principle, which became
fairly widespread, consisted of allowing a slave to have a small
'part-time job' selling wares or services. The profits would be his to
keep (the peculium). And in time he could purchase his freedom. But
this system was far from being pure kindheartedness on part of the
owners. Like this an old slave might buy his freedom, allowing his
master to buy a new young slave with the money. Hence the master
didn't lose his investment with the slave's eventual death.
The practice became so popular after the fall of the republic that
emperor Augustus saw it necessary to issue laws restricting it. For
once freed, a slave enjoyed full citizenship except for the right of
holding public office. And some freedmen used their skills, to become
richer even than the masters who had once possessed them. Another
privilege a slave might be awarded by his master, apart from the the
peculium, was the right to choose a mate from among the female slaves
and live with her in a form of marriage, the so-called contubernium.
This slave-marriage though had no legal status and any children born
from it belonged as slaves to the master of the house. In imperial
days the contubernium became legally recognized, forbidding any master
to sell partners of the contubernium separately.

Roman law regarded slaves as mere chattels. They were subject to the
will of their masters, against which they enjoyed no protection.
Punishments inflicted upon slaves were merciless. Hard labor,
whippings, branding, breaking of the joints or bones, branding of the
forehead with letters denoting the slave as a runaway, liar or thief
(FUG, KAL, FUR) and crucifixion were all punishments which were
inflicted upon slaves. So too, being thrown to the wild beasts in the
circuses or even being burnt alive in a cloak soaked in pitch.

But in the days of the empire the unlimited power of the master over
his slaves was curbed to some extent. Hadrian decreed that a master
should no longer hold power over a slave's life and death. And
Constantine the Great defined the killing of a slave as murder;
deliberate cruelty against slaves was frowned upon by a society which
did recognize slaves as human beings. Romans generally saw the
difference between the slave and the freeman as a difference in
status, not as a matter of any racial or cultural superiority and
inferiority. Naturally there are many gruesome tales of abuse and
brutal punishments. But in turn there are also reports of some slaves
being utterly devoted to their masters. Some enduring horrendous
tortures and death rather than betraying their masters.

And yet still the Roman view of slaves was one of contempt. Slaves
were people one looked down upon. Kindness toward them was rare, even
seen as a sign of weakness.

Vale,

Cato



SOURCE

www.roman-empire.net
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48973 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Re: De censorum edicto
Fl. Galerius Marca Hortensia sal.

Ah, I see you are always ready to lash out with acidity at what you perceive as rudeness without carefully studying the statements or asking for clarification. However, I would like to point out that while I also considered responding to L. Fidelius' post over his use of the term 'neo-pagan', I chose to carefully read over his post again.

Consider the following statements in his post:

"The bottom line is that Ancient Rome, especially in the Republic period, was strictly patriarchical."

He is correct on both anthropological, historical, and political grounds. Women were not allowed any direct voice in the political, military, or legal activities of Rome--they could not be magistrates, present a case in a court themselves, or become soldiers. All of the political and military leaders of Rome were men and there were no outstanding examples of women as philosophers or legal minds. This would pretty much define a patriarchical society, Marca Hortensia. The activities that you mention "to divorce, contract, inherit, sue in court. They could run businesses, travel, take lovers, use birth control, have abortions on demand, remarry, gamble, go to the Circus" were granted to them by men. There are examples of the paterfamilias of a family legally killing his wife because she drank wine (in the early Republic). There were certain businesses that a woman could run but it was usually because she was the widow, sister, daughter, or other relative of a craftsMAN who had started the business & because the local collegia allowed her to continue practicing her trade. While there are definite exceptions and examples in Roman history of women enjoying all of the rights you mention, those women were definitely working under a patriarchial society dominated by men.

"Nova Roma has been made, at least a large extent, to serve the needs of (so-called) neopagans."

His statement is correct that Nova Roma has been made to serve the needs of what most modern society refers to as pagans or neopagans. Only a limited number of our own citizens regularly use the term "cultores deorum" because it has been in use for less than a year. By saying to L. Fidelius, "You are the 'pagan' the yokel, the rube . . .", you are being insulting in the same way that early Christian writers were when they implied that those who continued to practice the Old Ways were crackers, hicks, and rednecks and were too unsophisticated to perceive the truth of Christianity. In the Republic, a pagani was merely a rural citizen or a citizen of the pagus; the farmers and herdsmen who were the backbone of the Rome's citizen soldiers. You lack charity and understanding, Marca Hortensia, that L. Fidelius was not meaning to be insulting when he used the term 'neo-pagan' as he might not have known to use the correct term.

Marca Hortensia, you are completely correct on the purpose for which Nova Roma was founded but you could have presented your arguments in a much better way without being so unpleasant.

I believe that I have made my point and I encourage both L. Fidelius and Marca Hortensia to be a bit more careful in their posts to the public lists or consider engaging in private dialogue.

Valete.



-----Original Message-----
From: rory12001@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 1:05 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: De censorum edicto


M. Hortensia L. Fidelius spd;
I read your post below with a sort of amazement at 1) the
historical inaccuracies 2) the sheer rudeness of your post

Since Cordus is busy with law school permit me to reply with some
history and a few facts.

1. Your supposition is absurd. We have many cives at this moment
residing in the urbs of Italia. They indeed are Roman. And those of
us who come together to follow Romanitas are also Roman. Do you have
to be born at the time of Jesus to qualify as a *real* Christian?

Your discussion of patriarchy is bizarre..By the late Republic -
Early Empire Roman women had many legal rights and were extremely
free: to divorce, contract, inherit, sue in court. They could run
businesses, travel, take lovers, use birth control, have abortions
on demand, remarry, gamble, go to the Circus. It would take until
the 20th Century in Europe & America for women to reach this same
state of affairs. So I suggest you pick up a history book.

2) Nova Roma was founded to return the Pax Deorum which rested on
the cultus deorum. Those of us who follow the religio call ourselves
cultores.
You are the 'pagan' the yokel, the rube, to use the rude
terms 'so-called' neo-pagans.' Asatru, Hellenismos, the Religio are
all examples of reconstructionist religions.
There are indeed pagans & neo-pagans & happily use this label
which is fine. They are not 'so-called' just as you are not a 'so-
called Christian' That would be quite rude.

4) Nova Roma's reason for being is to embody the best of Republican
Rome. To quote my friend A. Apollonius Cordus; the Romans were very
conservative but also very pragmatic.
We then try to follow the past as closely as possible making
changes that are pragmatic & sensible.
easy examples are no slavery & full civic rights & political
offices held by women.

My good friend Senator C. Curius Saturninus of Academia Thules is
giving a course on Roman History this spring. I suggest you sign up
for it asap!
bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior
producer "Vox Romana" podcast
http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/
Candidate for Tribune of the Plebs

1) However it's good to keep in mind that Nova Roma
> isn't actually Roman. I'm aware that many wouldn't believe that-
and
> this I think stems from that they don't *want* to believe it. The
> bottom line is that ancient Rome, especially in the republican
> period, was strictly patriarchical. Stepping away from any
> historical context- a patriarchical society generally is one that
> does not apologize, though when functioning properly it does step
in
> to make amends where they are needed. In the latter sense, NR does
> exhibit that spirit as evidenced by the edicto and in the general
> run of things of late which I've been very impressed with.
>
>
My response is also directed at some other posts we've seen lately
> as well which are generally phrased as "If Roma did a thing this
> way, why does Nova Roma do this thing another way?" and what I've
> given here is the simple answer to a host of such questions.

2.)Nova
> Roma has been made, at least a large extent, to serve the needs of
> (so-called) neopagans. There was no such a thing in ancient time-
> Rome was made and administered to serve ancient Romans and their
> beliefs which are even today coming to light- so there will always
> be some difference to what's found here. That is the diplomatic
> answer- specific reasons for distinctions seem to have specific
> reasonings, though these are usually up to the individual to seek
> out.
>
> In closing, I agree with you heartily. Nothing Roman needs
> apologizing for- though in my experience, not everything here is
> Roman. I hope that clarifies something for someone.
>
> Vale, et valete bene,
> L. Fidelius Graecus
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
> <a_apollonius_cordus@> wrote:
> >
> > A. Apollonius omnibus sal.
> >
> > I heartily a somewhat belatedly welcome this edictum of the
> censores. I only wish to add a little note which is not intended
as
> a criticism of the censores but merely as a small contribution to
> our ongoing effort to think and behave in a more Roman way.
> >
> > The censores wrote, "We hereby issue an official apology to
Lucius
> Marius Fimbria on behalf of the Office of the Censores of Nova
> Roma". I respectfully suggest that this is not a very Roman thing
> to do.
> >
> > My point is not that Romans never apologized. It's actually
true
> that they very rarely did, but that's not the point here. The
point
> is that the censores have apologized not for something *they* did,
> but for something their predecessors in office did.
> >
> > In the modern world we are used to thinking of certain jobs and
> offices as having some sort of continuous and independent
existence
> which has nothing to do with the individuals who hold those jobs
and
> offices. In Anglo-American legal terminology we talk about
> a "corporation sole". European monarchs (those few who are left)
> are corporations sole: in the U.K., for example, the Queen is not
> merely an individual who happens to be Queen but the holder of an
> office - "the Crown" - which exists independently of herself,
which
> existed before she was born, and which will exist after she dies.
> The Crown is a continuous entity with its own legal powers and
> duties, and it is really immaterial who happens to be doing the
job
> at any given moment. Queen Elizabeth II is, for most legal
> purposes, the same person as King George VI before her, and King
> Edward VIII before him, and so on. Similarly we have commercial
> companies which continue to exist independently of their
employees,
> managers, directors, &c. The company may be held financially
> responsible for something which it "did", so to speak, fifty years
> ago, even though all the people who actually made the relevant
> decisions and carried out the relevant orders are no longer
working
> for the company at all. Even though the person who happens to be
> King, or the person who happens to run the company, may die and it
> may be a little while before the next person comes in to take over
> the job, the Crown continues to exist uninterrupted, as does the
> company.
> >
> > The Romans did not, by and large, think in this way. There are
> exceptions, especially with regard to families. But they
certainly
> did not think in this way about political offices. This year's
> consules are not in any sense the same legal entities as last
year's
> consules. The consulate has no existence independent of its
> holders. "Consul" is not a legal person, it is just a title and a
> set of powers and duties which attach to a particular person. If
by
> some mischance there is no consul, the consulate ceases to exist.
> Its powers and duties are dispersed among various other people and
> bodies. And, most importantly in this case, this year's consules
> are in no sense responsible for things done by previous consules.
> They cannot take credit for them, and they cannot be blamed for
> them. The same is true of all magistrates, and indeed it is
> especially so for the censores, since their office was actually
> vacant for three and a half out of every five years and most
> certainly did not exist in any abstract sense during those periods
> of vacancy.
> >
> > So it really not within the power of our censores, much though
> they may wish to, to apologize for things done by previous
> censores. They cannot apologize of behalf "the office of the
> censores" because this is not an entity which has any continuous
> existence. If by "office" they mean "job" or "magistracy" then,
as
> I've already said, this magistracy does not exist independently of
> the censores themselves, and they cannot apologize on behalf of
it.
> If by "office of the censores" they mean "body of staff working
for
> the censores" then this, too, has no independent existence,
because
> each censor's staff is merely an assemblage of people appointed by
> him for the duration of his magistracy. It ceases to exist when
he
> leaves office, and the staff assembled by his successor is a
> different entity, even if it may contain some or even all of the
> same people. If we look at this from a Roman perspective, we must
> conclude that the censores can only meaningfully apologize for
> things which they themselves have done. If anyone is to apologize
> for a nota imposed on L. Marius, it must be the people who were
> censores when it was imposed.
> >
> > None of this is, of course, meant to detract from the sincerity
of
> the censores' statement. Clearly what they mean is that they
think
> their predecessors acted wrongly and they wish to assure Marius
that
> they do not support that act. That is a fine sentiment and finely
> said. It was merely expressed in a way which is not really in
tune
> with a Roman view of the world.
>



________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48974 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Re: Slavery in Roman Society
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
>
> OSD C. Equitius Cato
>
> Salvete omnes!
>
> SLAVERY
>
> If modern society frowns on the use of slavery, then what needs to be
...

SNIP TO BE BRIEF


Salve Cato,

Great article on slavery!

Like my father used to say, many in our modern western society are
slaves today. We are bound to our mortgages, credit card debts,
horseless chariot paymentsd et al. Even the super rich athletes payed
tens of millions cannot leave their masters (team owners) on a whim.

The only thing that abolished classical slavery was the mechanization
of the 19th century. The last bastion of western slavery was of course
the American south. I never bought the argument that the Civil War was
fought on that issue. If it was then it was one of the most senseless
slaughters or waste of life in history because one generation or 30
years later the mechanized farm equipment came in to being and like
farmers told me here, one tractor or combine or cat can do in a day
what 100 men could do in a week. Slavery was destined to become
totally uneconomical. With respect to Rome, there was that Heron's
steam engine that made an appearance but it is said the Emperor
squashed the idea of its deveopment since it would destroy the Roman
economy. Anyway, experiments on models show it didn't work too well ot
have enough power to do anything major.

Finally, in the past I checked the price of slaves and I see they were
in all ages, prohibitively expensive... especially a real sweet heart
of a girl that was child bearing potential! I am sure that the vast
majority were out of that league to be able to afford them.

Regards,

QSP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48975 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Re: Slavery in Roman Society
M. Hortensia G. Equitio Q. Suetonio spd;

slavery is with us today, below is the U.S gov't website with it's
2006 report on human trafficking - slavery. I believe Saudi Arabia
only officially abolished slavery in 1968.
http://www.state.gov/g/tip/rls/tiprpt/2006/

As to the past, before & during the Roman era, Persia did not
employ slaves. It is a point of great pride with my Zoroastrian
friends. In Egypt too slavery was quite limited.

It's never that simple when we speak of the past. Persia was a true
monarchy with no slaves. Rome an oligarchy with slavery....
bene valete
Maior
producer "Vox Romana" podcast
http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/
Candidate for Tribune of the Plebs



>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato"
<mlcinnyc@>
> wrote:
> >
> > OSD C. Equitius Cato
> >
> > Salvete omnes!
> >
> > SLAVERY
> >
> > If modern society frowns on the use of slavery, then what needs
to be
> ...
>
> SNIP TO BE BRIEF
>
>
> Salve Cato,
>
> Great article on slavery!
>
> Like my father used to say, many in our modern western society are
> slaves today. We are bound to our mortgages, credit card debts,
> horseless chariot paymentsd et al. Even the super rich athletes
payed
> tens of millions cannot leave their masters (team owners) on a
whim.
>
> The only thing that abolished classical slavery was the
mechanization
> of the 19th century. The last bastion of western slavery was of
course
> the American south. I never bought the argument that the Civil War
was
> fought on that issue. If it was then it was one of the most
senseless
> slaughters or waste of life in history because one generation or
30
> years later the mechanized farm equipment came in to being and
like
> farmers told me here, one tractor or combine or cat can do in a
day
> what 100 men could do in a week. Slavery was destined to become
> totally uneconomical. With respect to Rome, there was that Heron's
> steam engine that made an appearance but it is said the Emperor
> squashed the idea of its deveopment since it would destroy the
Roman
> economy. Anyway, experiments on models show it didn't work too
well ot
> have enough power to do anything major.
>
> Finally, in the past I checked the price of slaves and I see they
were
> in all ages, prohibitively expensive... especially a real sweet
heart
> of a girl that was child bearing potential! I am sure that the
vast
> majority were out of that league to be able to afford them.
>
> Regards,
>
> QSP
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48976 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Re: De censorum edicto
M. Hortensia Fl. Galerio Aureliano spd;
This is the forum & I absolutely defend Graecus' right to say
whatever he wants. This is the Roman way. Below is a quote to help
you understand.

I am sorry to only have this quote about Tiberius to hand, perhaps
we all should emulate Cato the Younger in the ferocity of our
speech. A noble Roman tradition.

" More than that, he was self-contained and patient in the face of
abuse and slander, and of lampoons on himself and his family, often
asserting that in a free country there should be free speech and
free thought "
Suetonius Life of Tiberius, 28
http://webu2.upmf-
grenoble.fr/Haiti/Cours/Ak/Anglica/Suetonius3_engl.gr.htm
M. Hortensia Maior
producer "Vox Romana"
http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana
Candidate for Tribune of the Plebs

I believe that I have made my point and I encourage both L.
Fidelius and Marca Hortensia to be a bit more careful in their posts
to the public lists or consider engaging in private dialogue.
>
> Valete.
>
>
>
> rom: rory12001@...
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 1:05 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: De censorum edicto
>
>
> M. Hortensia L. Fidelius spd;
> I read your post below with a sort of amazement at 1) the
> historical inaccuracies 2) the sheer rudeness of your post
>
> Since Cordus is busy with law school permit me to reply with some
> history and a few facts.
>
> 1. Your supposition is absurd. We have many cives at this moment
> residing in the urbs of Italia. They indeed are Roman. And those
of
> us who come together to follow Romanitas are also Roman. Do you
have
> to be born at the time of Jesus to qualify as a *real* Christian?
>
> Your discussion of patriarchy is bizarre..By the late Republic -
> Early Empire Roman women had many legal rights and were extremely
> free: to divorce, contract, inherit, sue in court. They could run
> businesses, travel, take lovers, use birth control, have abortions
> on demand, remarry, gamble, go to the Circus. It would take until
> the 20th Century in Europe & America for women to reach this same
> state of affairs. So I suggest you pick up a history book.
>
> 2) Nova Roma was founded to return the Pax Deorum which rested on
> the cultus deorum. Those of us who follow the religio call
ourselves
> cultores.
> You are the 'pagan' the yokel, the rube, to use the rude
> terms 'so-called' neo-pagans.' Asatru, Hellenismos, the Religio
are
> all examples of reconstructionist religions.
> There are indeed pagans & neo-pagans & happily use this label
> which is fine. They are not 'so-called' just as you are not a 'so-
> called Christian' That would be quite rude.
>
> 4) Nova Roma's reason for being is to embody the best of
Republican
> Rome. To quote my friend A. Apollonius Cordus; the Romans were
very
> conservative but also very pragmatic.
> We then try to follow the past as closely as possible making
> changes that are pragmatic & sensible.
> easy examples are no slavery & full civic rights & political
> offices held by women.
>
> My good friend Senator C. Curius Saturninus of Academia Thules is
> giving a course on Roman History this spring. I suggest you sign
up
> for it asap!
> bene valete in pacem deorum
> Marca Hortensia Maior
> producer "Vox Romana" podcast
> http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/
> Candidate for Tribune of the Plebs
>
> 1) However it's good to keep in mind that Nova Roma
> > isn't actually Roman. I'm aware that many wouldn't believe that-
> and
> > this I think stems from that they don't *want* to believe it.
The
> > bottom line is that ancient Rome, especially in the republican
> > period, was strictly patriarchical. Stepping away from any
> > historical context- a patriarchical society generally is one
that
> > does not apologize, though when functioning properly it does
step
> in
> > to make amends where they are needed. In the latter sense, NR
does
> > exhibit that spirit as evidenced by the edicto and in the
general
> > run of things of late which I've been very impressed with.
> >
> >
> My response is also directed at some other posts we've seen lately
> > as well which are generally phrased as "If Roma did a thing this
> > way, why does Nova Roma do this thing another way?" and what
I've
> > given here is the simple answer to a host of such questions.
>
> 2.)Nova
> > Roma has been made, at least a large extent, to serve the needs
of
> > (so-called) neopagans. There was no such a thing in ancient time-

> > Rome was made and administered to serve ancient Romans and their
> > beliefs which are even today coming to light- so there will
always
> > be some difference to what's found here. That is the diplomatic
> > answer- specific reasons for distinctions seem to have specific
> > reasonings, though these are usually up to the individual to
seek
> > out.
> >
> > In closing, I agree with you heartily. Nothing Roman needs
> > apologizing for- though in my experience, not everything here is
> > Roman. I hope that clarifies something for someone.
> >
> > Vale, et valete bene,
> > L. Fidelius Graecus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
> > <a_apollonius_cordus@> wrote:
> > >
> > > A. Apollonius omnibus sal.
> > >
> > > I heartily a somewhat belatedly welcome this edictum of the
> > censores. I only wish to add a little note which is not intended
> as
> > a criticism of the censores but merely as a small contribution
to
> > our ongoing effort to think and behave in a more Roman way.
> > >
> > > The censores wrote, "We hereby issue an official apology to
> Lucius
> > Marius Fimbria on behalf of the Office of the Censores of Nova
> > Roma". I respectfully suggest that this is not a very Roman
thing
> > to do.
> > >
> > > My point is not that Romans never apologized. It's actually
> true
> > that they very rarely did, but that's not the point here. The
> point
> > is that the censores have apologized not for something *they*
did,
> > but for something their predecessors in office did.
> > >
> > > In the modern world we are used to thinking of certain jobs
and
> > offices as having some sort of continuous and independent
> existence
> > which has nothing to do with the individuals who hold those jobs
> and
> > offices. In Anglo-American legal terminology we talk about
> > a "corporation sole". European monarchs (those few who are left)
> > are corporations sole: in the U.K., for example, the Queen is
not
> > merely an individual who happens to be Queen but the holder of
an
> > office - "the Crown" - which exists independently of herself,
> which
> > existed before she was born, and which will exist after she
dies.
> > The Crown is a continuous entity with its own legal powers and
> > duties, and it is really immaterial who happens to be doing the
> job
> > at any given moment. Queen Elizabeth II is, for most legal
> > purposes, the same person as King George VI before her, and King
> > Edward VIII before him, and so on. Similarly we have commercial
> > companies which continue to exist independently of their
> employees,
> > managers, directors, &c. The company may be held financially
> > responsible for something which it "did", so to speak, fifty
years
> > ago, even though all the people who actually made the relevant
> > decisions and carried out the relevant orders are no longer
> working
> > for the company at all. Even though the person who happens to be
> > King, or the person who happens to run the company, may die and
it
> > may be a little while before the next person comes in to take
over
> > the job, the Crown continues to exist uninterrupted, as does the
> > company.
> > >
> > > The Romans did not, by and large, think in this way. There are
> > exceptions, especially with regard to families. But they
> certainly
> > did not think in this way about political offices. This year's
> > consules are not in any sense the same legal entities as last
> year's
> > consules. The consulate has no existence independent of its
> > holders. "Consul" is not a legal person, it is just a title and
a
> > set of powers and duties which attach to a particular person. If
> by
> > some mischance there is no consul, the consulate ceases to
exist.
> > Its powers and duties are dispersed among various other people
and
> > bodies. And, most importantly in this case, this year's consules
> > are in no sense responsible for things done by previous
consules.
> > They cannot take credit for them, and they cannot be blamed for
> > them. The same is true of all magistrates, and indeed it is
> > especially so for the censores, since their office was actually
> > vacant for three and a half out of every five years and most
> > certainly did not exist in any abstract sense during those
periods
> > of vacancy.
> > >
> > > So it really not within the power of our censores, much though
> > they may wish to, to apologize for things done by previous
> > censores. They cannot apologize of behalf "the office of the
> > censores" because this is not an entity which has any continuous
> > existence. If by "office" they mean "job" or "magistracy" then,
> as
> > I've already said, this magistracy does not exist independently
of
> > the censores themselves, and they cannot apologize on behalf of
> it.
> > If by "office of the censores" they mean "body of staff working
> for
> > the censores" then this, too, has no independent existence,
> because
> > each censor's staff is merely an assemblage of people appointed
by
> > him for the duration of his magistracy. It ceases to exist when
> he
> > leaves office, and the staff assembled by his successor is a
> > different entity, even if it may contain some or even all of the
> > same people. If we look at this from a Roman perspective, we
must
> > conclude that the censores can only meaningfully apologize for
> > things which they themselves have done. If anyone is to
apologize
> > for a nota imposed on L. Marius, it must be the people who were
> > censores when it was imposed.
> > >
> > > None of this is, of course, meant to detract from the
sincerity
> of
> > the censores' statement. Clearly what they mean is that they
> think
> > their predecessors acted wrongly and they wish to assure Marius
> that
> > they do not support that act. That is a fine sentiment and
finely
> > said. It was merely expressed in a way which is not really in
> tune
> > with a Roman view of the world.
> >
>
>
>
>
_____________________________________________________________________
___
> Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and
security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from
across the web, free AOL Mail and more.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48977 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Re: De censorum edicto
M. Hortensia Quiritibus Fl. Galerioque spd;
As promised here is a really worthy quote about free speech from
a great Roman, Marcius Porcius Cato Uticensis:
.
Cato was in command at Utica. After word reached Utica of Caesar's
definitive victory against Scipio's army at the Battle of Thapsus
(April, 46), Cato enjoined his son, with bitter pride, to surrender
to Caesar; "I grew up in freedom, with the right of free speech. I
cannot change my ways in my latter years and accustom myself to
servitude. But it is right that you, having been born and brought up
in such conditions, should serve the divinity that governs your
destiny." Cassius Dio, XLIII, p. 227.


we all should emulate Cato the Younger in the ferocity of our
speech. A noble Roman tradition! It's being very Roman.

Here at Lacus Curtius is Plutarchs' Life of Cato the Younger:
http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Plutarch/Lives/Cato
_Minor*.html

http://tinyurl.com/33spkp

And here at Lacus Curtius is another great resource:
Plutarch's "Sayings of prominent Romans"
http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Plutarch/Moralia/Sa
yings_of_Romans*/home.html

http://tinyurl.com/2ousos

A great topic for discussion.
bene valete in pacem deorum
M. Hortensia Maior





" More than that, he was self-contained and patient in the face of
> abuse and slander, and of lampoons on himself and his family,
often
> asserting that in a free country there should be free speech and
> free thought "
> Suetonius Life of Tiberius, 28
> http://webu2.upmf-
> grenoble.fr/Haiti/Cours/Ak/Anglica/Suetonius3_engl.gr.htm
> M. Hortensia Maior
> producer "Vox Romana"
> http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana
> Candidate for Tribune of the Plebs
>
> I believe that I have made my point and I encourage both L.
> Fidelius and Marca Hortensia to be a bit more careful in their
posts
> to the public lists or consider engaging in private dialogue.
> >
> > Valete.
> >
> >
> >
> > rom: rory12001@
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 1:05 AM
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: De censorum edicto
> >
> >
> > M. Hortensia L. Fidelius spd;
> > I read your post below with a sort of amazement at 1) the
> > historical inaccuracies 2) the sheer rudeness of your post
> >
> > Since Cordus is busy with law school permit me to reply with
some
> > history and a few facts.
> >
> > 1. Your supposition is absurd. We have many cives at this moment
> > residing in the urbs of Italia. They indeed are Roman. And those
> of
> > us who come together to follow Romanitas are also Roman. Do you
> have
> > to be born at the time of Jesus to qualify as a *real* Christian?
> >
> > Your discussion of patriarchy is bizarre..By the late Republic -
> > Early Empire Roman women had many legal rights and were
extremely
> > free: to divorce, contract, inherit, sue in court. They could
run
> > businesses, travel, take lovers, use birth control, have
abortions
> > on demand, remarry, gamble, go to the Circus. It would take
until
> > the 20th Century in Europe & America for women to reach this
same
> > state of affairs. So I suggest you pick up a history book.
> >
> > 2) Nova Roma was founded to return the Pax Deorum which rested
on
> > the cultus deorum. Those of us who follow the religio call
> ourselves
> > cultores.
> > You are the 'pagan' the yokel, the rube, to use the rude
> > terms 'so-called' neo-pagans.' Asatru, Hellenismos, the Religio
> are
> > all examples of reconstructionist religions.
> > There are indeed pagans & neo-pagans & happily use this label
> > which is fine. They are not 'so-called' just as you are not
a 'so-
> > called Christian' That would be quite rude.
> >
> > 4) Nova Roma's reason for being is to embody the best of
> Republican
> > Rome. To quote my friend A. Apollonius Cordus; the Romans were
> very
> > conservative but also very pragmatic.
> > We then try to follow the past as closely as possible making
> > changes that are pragmatic & sensible.
> > easy examples are no slavery & full civic rights & political
> > offices held by women.
> >
> > My good friend Senator C. Curius Saturninus of Academia Thules
is
> > giving a course on Roman History this spring. I suggest you sign
> up
> > for it asap!
> > bene valete in pacem deorum
> > Marca Hortensia Maior
> > producer "Vox Romana" podcast
> > http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/
> > Candidate for Tribune of the Plebs
> >
> > 1) However it's good to keep in mind that Nova Roma
> > > isn't actually Roman. I'm aware that many wouldn't believe
that-
> > and
> > > this I think stems from that they don't *want* to believe it.
> The
> > > bottom line is that ancient Rome, especially in the republican
> > > period, was strictly patriarchical. Stepping away from any
> > > historical context- a patriarchical society generally is one
> that
> > > does not apologize, though when functioning properly it does
> step
> > in
> > > to make amends where they are needed. In the latter sense, NR
> does
> > > exhibit that spirit as evidenced by the edicto and in the
> general
> > > run of things of late which I've been very impressed with.
> > >
> > >
> > My response is also directed at some other posts we've seen
lately
> > > as well which are generally phrased as "If Roma did a thing
this
> > > way, why does Nova Roma do this thing another way?" and what
> I've
> > > given here is the simple answer to a host of such questions.
> >
> > 2.)Nova
> > > Roma has been made, at least a large extent, to serve the
needs
> of
> > > (so-called) neopagans. There was no such a thing in ancient
time-
>
> > > Rome was made and administered to serve ancient Romans and
their
> > > beliefs which are even today coming to light- so there will
> always
> > > be some difference to what's found here. That is the
diplomatic
> > > answer- specific reasons for distinctions seem to have
specific
> > > reasonings, though these are usually up to the individual to
> seek
> > > out.
> > >
> > > In closing, I agree with you heartily. Nothing Roman needs
> > > apologizing for- though in my experience, not everything here
is
> > > Roman. I hope that clarifies something for someone.
> > >
> > > Vale, et valete bene,
> > > L. Fidelius Graecus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
> > > <a_apollonius_cordus@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > A. Apollonius omnibus sal.
> > > >
> > > > I heartily a somewhat belatedly welcome this edictum of the
> > > censores. I only wish to add a little note which is not
intended
> > as
> > > a criticism of the censores but merely as a small contribution
> to
> > > our ongoing effort to think and behave in a more Roman way.
> > > >
> > > > The censores wrote, "We hereby issue an official apology to
> > Lucius
> > > Marius Fimbria on behalf of the Office of the Censores of Nova
> > > Roma". I respectfully suggest that this is not a very Roman
> thing
> > > to do.
> > > >
> > > > My point is not that Romans never apologized. It's actually
> > true
> > > that they very rarely did, but that's not the point here. The
> > point
> > > is that the censores have apologized not for something *they*
> did,
> > > but for something their predecessors in office did.
> > > >
> > > > In the modern world we are used to thinking of certain jobs
> and
> > > offices as having some sort of continuous and independent
> > existence
> > > which has nothing to do with the individuals who hold those
jobs
> > and
> > > offices. In Anglo-American legal terminology we talk about
> > > a "corporation sole". European monarchs (those few who are
left)
> > > are corporations sole: in the U.K., for example, the Queen is
> not
> > > merely an individual who happens to be Queen but the holder of
> an
> > > office - "the Crown" - which exists independently of herself,
> > which
> > > existed before she was born, and which will exist after she
> dies.
> > > The Crown is a continuous entity with its own legal powers and
> > > duties, and it is really immaterial who happens to be doing
the
> > job
> > > at any given moment. Queen Elizabeth II is, for most legal
> > > purposes, the same person as King George VI before her, and
King
> > > Edward VIII before him, and so on. Similarly we have
commercial
> > > companies which continue to exist independently of their
> > employees,
> > > managers, directors, &c. The company may be held financially
> > > responsible for something which it "did", so to speak, fifty
> years
> > > ago, even though all the people who actually made the relevant
> > > decisions and carried out the relevant orders are no longer
> > working
> > > for the company at all. Even though the person who happens to
be
> > > King, or the person who happens to run the company, may die
and
> it
> > > may be a little while before the next person comes in to take
> over
> > > the job, the Crown continues to exist uninterrupted, as does
the
> > > company.
> > > >
> > > > The Romans did not, by and large, think in this way. There
are
> > > exceptions, especially with regard to families. But they
> > certainly
> > > did not think in this way about political offices. This year's
> > > consules are not in any sense the same legal entities as last
> > year's
> > > consules. The consulate has no existence independent of its
> > > holders. "Consul" is not a legal person, it is just a title
and
> a
> > > set of powers and duties which attach to a particular person.
If
> > by
> > > some mischance there is no consul, the consulate ceases to
> exist.
> > > Its powers and duties are dispersed among various other people
> and
> > > bodies. And, most importantly in this case, this year's
consules
> > > are in no sense responsible for things done by previous
> consules.
> > > They cannot take credit for them, and they cannot be blamed
for
> > > them. The same is true of all magistrates, and indeed it is
> > > especially so for the censores, since their office was
actually
> > > vacant for three and a half out of every five years and most
> > > certainly did not exist in any abstract sense during those
> periods
> > > of vacancy.
> > > >
> > > > So it really not within the power of our censores, much
though
> > > they may wish to, to apologize for things done by previous
> > > censores. They cannot apologize of behalf "the office of the
> > > censores" because this is not an entity which has any
continuous
> > > existence. If by "office" they mean "job" or "magistracy"
then,
> > as
> > > I've already said, this magistracy does not exist
independently
> of
> > > the censores themselves, and they cannot apologize on behalf
of
> > it.
> > > If by "office of the censores" they mean "body of staff
working
> > for
> > > the censores" then this, too, has no independent existence,
> > because
> > > each censor's staff is merely an assemblage of people
appointed
> by
> > > him for the duration of his magistracy. It ceases to exist
when
> > he
> > > leaves office, and the staff assembled by his successor is a
> > > different entity, even if it may contain some or even all of
the
> > > same people. If we look at this from a Roman perspective, we
> must
> > > conclude that the censores can only meaningfully apologize for
> > > things which they themselves have done. If anyone is to
> apologize
> > > for a nota imposed on L. Marius, it must be the people who
were
> > > censores when it was imposed.
> > > >
> > > > None of this is, of course, meant to detract from the
> sincerity
> > of
> > > the censores' statement. Clearly what they mean is that they
> > think
> > > their predecessors acted wrongly and they wish to assure
Marius
> > that
> > > they do not support that act. That is a fine sentiment and
> finely
> > > said. It was merely expressed in a way which is not really in
> > tune
> > > with a Roman view of the world.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
_____________________________________________________________________
> ___
> > Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety
and
> security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos
from
> across the web, free AOL Mail and more.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48978 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Non sequitur, Marca Hortensia
Fl. Galerius Marca Hortensia sal.

I don't want to seem obtuse but your remarks do not follow any course of
logical progression with which I am acquainted. L. Fidelius responded to a post
from A.Apollonius Cordus. You responded to L. Fidelius by saying he was
wrong on historical grounds; accused him of rudeness; insinuated that he is a
rube and a yokel; and that he should pick up a history book and/or take a
history course at the Academia Thule because he is historically inept. You also
responded in the name of A.Apollonius Cordus who is one citizen who definitely
does not need anyone to speak for him.

My post pointed out the flaw that your portions of your argument against L.
Fidelius were specious and included information that was historically
inaccurate. I stated very clearly that you were just as rude in your response to L.
Fidelius as you accused him of being and I suggested that you could be more
pleasant and charitable in your interpretation & response to such posts. I
definitely stated that you could be more polite.

Now you say that you absolutely defend L. Fidelius Graecus right to say
whatever he wants but have nothing to say about any of the pertinent points of my
prior post to you. Some might consider that sort of response to be evasive.
Others might interpret it to mean that you do not have any regret about
being rude or making nasty comments to another citizen. The use of a quote from
a classical source that doesn't really address the real point of my post to
you could be seen as a tactic used by someone when they find themselves in a
situation where they cannot answer a direct question or point of discussion
without appearing to be wrong.

To close, I find it very interesting that you support the idea that Nova
Romans should be as pragmatic and sensible as Ancient Romans but you continue to
want to hold on to practices & positions that have no useful purpose any
longer.

Vale.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
Propraetor Austrorientalis
Flamen Cerialis
Candidate for Tribune of the Plebs


M. Hortensia Fl. Galerio Aureliano spd;
This is the forum & I absolutely defend Graecus' right to say whatever he
wants. This is the Roman way. Below is a quote to help you understand.

I am sorry to only have this quote about Tiberius to hand, perhaps we all
should emulate Cato the Younger in the ferocity of our speech. A noble Roman
tradition.

" More than that, he was self-contained and patient in the face of abuse and
slander, and of lampoons on himself and his family, often asserting that in
a free country there should be free speech and free thought "
Suetonius Life of Tiberius, 28
_http://webu2.http:_ (http://webu2.upmf-/)
grenoble.fr/grenoble.fr/grenoble.frgrenoble.frgrenoble.fr
M. Hortensia Maior
producer "Vox Romana"
_http://www.insulaumhttp://www.insulh_ (http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana)
Candidate for Tribune of the Plebs

I believe that I have made my point and I encourage both L. Fidelius and
Marca Hortensia to be a bit more careful in their posts to the public lists or
consider engaging in private dialogue.

Valete.

Fl. Galerius Marca Hortensia sal.

Ah, I see you are always ready to lash out with acidity at what you perceive
as rudeness without carefully studying the statements or asking for
clarification. However, I would like to point out that while I also considered
responding to L. Fidelius' post over his use of the term 'neo-pagan', I chose to
carefully read over his post again.

Consider the following statements in his post:

"The bottom line is that Ancient Rome, especially in the Republic period,
was strictly patriarchical."

He is correct on both anthropological, historical, and political grounds.
Women were not allowed any direct voice in the political, military, or legal
activities of Rome--they could not be magistrates, present a case in a court
themselves, or become soldiers. All of the political and military leaders of
Rome were men and there were no outstanding examples of women as philosophers
or legal minds. This would pretty much define a patriarchical society, Marca
Hortensia. The activities that you mention "to divorce, contract, inherit, sue
in court. They could run businesses, travel, take lovers, use birth control,
have abortions on demand, remarry, gamble, go to the Circus" were granted to
them by men. There are examples of the paterfamilias of a family legally
killing his wife because she drank wine (in the early Republic). There were
certain businesses that a woman could run but it was usually because she was the
widow, sister, daughter, or other relative of a craftsMAN who had started the
business & because the local collegia allowed her to continue practicing her
trade. While there are definite exceptions and examples in Roman history of
women enjoying all of the rights you mention, those women were definitely
working under a patriarchial society dominated by men.

"Nova Roma has been made, at least a large extent, to serve the needs of
(so-called) neopagans."

His statement is correct that Nova Roma has been made to serve the needs of
what most modern society refers to as pagans or neopagans. Only a limited
number of our own citizens regularly use the term "cultores deorum" because it
has been in use for less than a year. By saying to L. Fidelius, "You are the
'pagan' the yokel, the rube . . .", you are being insulting in the same way
that early Christian writers were when they implied that those who continued to
practice the Old Ways were crackers, hicks, and rednecks and were too
unsophisticated to perceive the truth of Christianity. In the Republic, a pagani
was merely a rural citizen or a citizen of the pagus; the farmers and herdsmen
who were the backbone of the Rome's citizen soldiers. You lack charity and
understanding, Marca Hortensia, that L. Fidelius was not meaning to be
insulting when he used the term 'neo-pagan' as he might not have known to use the
correct term.

Marca Hortensia, you are completely correct on the purpose for which Nova
Roma was founded but you could have presented your arguments in a much better
way without being so unpleasant.

I believe that I have made my point and I encourage both L. Fidelius and
Marca Hortensia to be a bit more careful in their posts to the public lists or
consider engaging in private dialogue.

Valete.

rom: rory12001@..r
To: _Nova-Roma@yahoogrouNova-R_ (mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com)
Sent: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 1:05 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: De censorum edicto

M. Hortensia L. Fidelius spd;
I read your post below with a sort of amazement at 1) the historical
inaccuracies 2) the sheer rudeness of your post

Since Cordus is busy with law school permit me to reply with some history
and a few facts.

1. Your supposition is absurd. We have many cives at this moment residing in
the urbs of Italia. They indeed are Roman. And those of us who come
together to follow Romanitas are also Roman. Do you have to be born at the time of
Jesus to qualify as a *real* Christian?

Your discussion of patriarchy is bizarre..By the late Republic - Early
Empire Roman women had many legal rights and were extremely free: to divorce,
contract, inherit, sue in court. They could run businesses, travel, take lovers,
use birth control, have abortions on demand, remarry, gamble, go to the
Circus. It would take until the 20th Century in Europe & America for women to
reach this same state of affairs. So I suggest you pick up a history book.

2) Nova Roma was founded to return the Pax Deorum which rested on the cultus
deorum. Those of us who follow the religio call ourselves cultores. You
are the 'pagan' the yokel, the rube, to use the rude
terms 'so-called' neo-pagans.' Asatru, Hellenismos, the Religio are all
examples of reconstructionist religions. Tere are indeed pagans & neo-pagans &
happily use this label which is fine. They are not 'so-called' just as you
are not a 'so-called Christian' That would be quite rude.

4) Nova Roma's reason for being is to embody the best of Republican Rome. To
quote my friend A. Apollonius Cordus; the Romans were very conservative but
also very pragmatic. We then try to follow the past as closely as possible
making changes that are pragmatic & sensible. easy examples are no slavery &
full civic rights & political offices held by women.

My good friend Senator C. Curius Saturninus of Academia Thules is giving a
course on Roman History this spring. I suggest you sign up for it asap!

bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior
producer "Vox Romana" podcast
_http://www.insulaumhttp://www.insulht_
(http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/)
Candidate for Tribune of the Plebs

1) However it's good to keep in mind that Nova Roma isn't actually Roman.
I'm aware that many wouldn't believe that-and this I think stems from that
they don't *want* to believe it.
The bottom line is that ancient Rome, especially in the republican period,
was strictly patriarchical. Stepping away from any historical context- a
patriarchical society generally is one that does not apologize, though when
functioning properly it does step in to make amends where they are needed. In the
latter sense, NR does exhibit that spirit as evidenced by the edicto and in
the general run of things of late which I've been very impressed with.

My response is also directed at some other posts we've seen lately as well
which are generally phrased as "If Roma did a thing this way, why does Nova
Roma do this thing another way?" and what I've given here is the simple answer
to a host of such questions.

2.)Nova Roma has been made, at least a large extent, to serve the needs of
(so-called) neopagans. There was no such a thing in ancient time-Rome was
made and administered to serve ancient Romans and their
beliefs which are even today coming to light-so there will always be some
difference to what's found here. That is the diplomatic answer- specific
reasons for distinctions seem to have specific reasonings, though these are usually
up to the individual to seek out.

In closing, I agree with you heartily. Nothing Roman needs apologizing for-
though in my experience, not everything here is Roman. I hope that clarifies
something for someone.

Vale, et valete bene,
L. Fidelius Graecus

--- In _Nova-Roma@yahoogrouNova-R_ (mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com) , "A.
Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_a_apoll> wrote:

A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

I heartily a somewhat belatedly welcome this edictum of the censores. I only
wish to add a little note which is not intended as a criticism of the
censores but merely as a small contribution to our ongoing effort to think and
behave in a more Roman way.

The censores wrote, "We hereby issue an official apology to Lucius Marius
Fimbria on behalf of the Office of the Censores of Nova Roma". I respectfully
suggest that this is not a very Roman thing to do.

My point is not that Romans never apologized. It's actually true that they
very rarely did, but that's not the point here. The point is that the censores
have apologized not for something *they* did, but for something their
predecessors in office did.

In the modern world we are used to thinking of certain jobs and offices as
having some sort of continuous and independent existence which has nothing to
do with the individuals who hold those jobs and offices. In Anglo-American
legal terminology we talk about a "corporation sole". European monarchs (those
few who are left) are corporations sole: in the U.K., for example, the Queen
is not merely an individual who happens to be Queen but the holder of an
office - "the Crown" - which exists independently of herself, which
existed before she was born, and which will exist after she dies.

The Crown is a continuous entity with its own legal powers and duties, and
it is really immaterial who happens to be doing the job at any given moment.
Queen Elizabeth II is, for most legal purposes, the same person as King George
VI before her, and King Edward VIII before him, and so on. Similarly we have
commercial companies which continue to exist independently of their
employees, managers, directors, &c. The company may be held financially responsible
for something which it "did", so to speak, fifty years ago, even though all
the people who actually made the relevant decisions and carried out the
relevant orders are no longer working for the company at all. Even though the person
who happens to be King, or the person who happens to run the company, may
die and it may be a little while before the next person comes in to take over
the job, the Crown continues to exist uninterrupted, as does the company.

The Romans did not, by and large, think in this way. There are exceptions,
especially with regard to families. But they certainly did not think in this
way about political offices. This year's consules are not in any sense the
same legal entities as last year's consules. The consulate has no existence
independent of its
holders. "Consul" is not a legal person, it is just a title and a set of
powers and duties which attach to a particular person. If by some mischance
there is no consul, the consulate ceases to exist. Its powers and duties are
dispersed among various other people and bodies. And, most importantly in this
case, this year's consules are in no sense responsible for things done by
previous consules.

They cannot take credit for them, and they cannot be blamed for them. The
same is true of all magistrates, and indeed it is especially so for the
censores, since their office was actually vacant for three and a half out of
every five years and most certainly did not exist in any abstract sense during
those periods of vacancy.

So it really not within the power of our censores, much though they may wish
to, to apologize for things done by previous censores. They cannot apologize
of behalf "the office of the censores" because this is not an entity which
has any continuous existence. If by "office" they mean "job" or "magistracy"
then, as I've already said, this magistracy does not exist independently of
the censores themselves, and they cannot apologize on behalf of it. If by
"office of the censores" they mean "body of staff working for the censores"
then this, too, has no independent existence, because each censor's staff is
merely an assemblage of people appointed by him for the duration of his
magistracy. It ceases to exist when he leaves office, and the staff assembled by his
successor is a different entity, even if it may contain some or even all of
the
same people. If we look at this from a Roman perspective, we must conclude
that the censores can only meaningfully apologize for things which they
themselves have done. If anyone is to apologize for a nota imposed on L. Marius,
it must be the people who were censores when it was imposed.

None of this is, of course, meant to detract from the sincerity of the
censores' statement. Clearly what they mean is that they think their predecessors
acted wrongly and they wish to assure Marius that they do not support that
act. That is a fine sentiment and finely said. It was merely expressed in a way
which is not really in tune with a Roman view of the world.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48979 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: To Marca Hortensia
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Marca Hortensia sal.

I am completely in favor of free and open dialogue on the mainlist but I
believe that you and I differ somewhat on the interpretation of what "ferocity"
means in this or a historic context. I cannot recall in Cato the Younger's
works any specific examples of calling another citizen rude, hick, yokel, and
stupid. I believe that ferocity of speech means that one should be
impassioned, enthusiastic, and firm in one's argument. I do not believe it means to
advocate civil unrest or uncivil behavior. I do not believe that it means
invoking another person's name to present your own arguments or opinions when
that person is still alive and able to communicate for themselves. I have
pointed out to you in a number of previous posts when you invoked another
citizen's words or opinions that those individuals were not leaping in with both
feet to say how much they agreed with you.

I also have no problem with you using the exemplary words of great Romans
especially as your own words are somewhat twisted and confusing at times.

Vale.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
Propraetor Austrorientalis
Flamen Cerialis
Candidate for Tribune of the Plebs

M. Hortensia Quiritibus Fl. Galerioque spd;
As promised here is a really worthy quote about free speech from
a great Roman, Marcius Porcius Cato Uticensis:
.
Cato was in command at Utica. After word reached Utica of Caesar's
definitive victory against Scipio's army at the Battle of Thapsus
(April, 46), Cato enjoined his son, with bitter pride, to surrender
to Caesar; "I grew up in freedom, with the right of free speech. I
cannot change my ways in my latter years and accustom myself to
servitude. But it is right that you, having been born and brought up
in such conditions, should serve the divinity that governs your
destiny." Cassius Dio, XLIII, p. 227.

we all should emulate Cato the Younger in the ferocity of our
speech. A noble Roman tradition! It's being very Roman.

Here at Lacus Curtius is Plutarchs' Life of Cato the Younger:
_http://penelope.http://pehttp://penehttp://penelophttp://pehttp://pen_
(http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Plutarch/Lives/Cato)
_Minor*.html

_http://tinyurl.http://tin_ (http://tinyurl.com/33spkp)

And here at Lacus Curtius is another great resource:
Plutarch's "Sayings of prominent Romans"
_http://penelope.http://pehttp://penehttp://penelophttp://pehttp://pen_
(http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Plutarch/Moralia/Sa)
yings_of_Romans*yings_of_R

_http://tinyurl.http://tin_ (http://tinyurl.com/2ousos)

A great topic for discussion.
bene valete in pacem deorum
M. Hortensia Maior



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48980 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2007-02-08
Subject: Re: To Marca Hortensia
Scaurus Aureliano SPD.

Cato the Younger is said to have been one who spread the rumour that
Caesar offered his arse to the king of Bithynia for a fleet in his
younger days. Being accused of playing the catamite for
political-military advantage is rather more potent stuff than being
called a hick. Roman political rhetoric was often filled with
invective and often sexual invective. If you want more examples than
can be recounted here, take a look at Cicero's Philippics. The view
of Roman political rhetoric you seem to be advocating is very
Victorian, but it doesn't accord well with the evidence from
Republican Rome.

Vale.

Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48981 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Ways of Being Roman
M. Hortensia Quiritibus G. Iulio Scauro spd;

I'm happy to have a good discussion of Roman political culture,
invective, qualities that Romans admired, exemplars of Roman
character; good & bad!
But I won't continue this silly duel with Aurelianus. If you
want him vote for him , if you want me vote for me. Enough said.
valete
M. Hortensia Maior
>
> Scaurus Aureliano SPD.
>
> Cato the Younger is said to have been one who spread the rumour
that
> Caesar offered his arse to the king of Bithynia for a fleet in his
> younger days. Being accused of playing the catamite for
> political-military advantage is rather more potent stuff than being
> called a hick. Roman political rhetoric was often filled with
> invective and often sexual invective. If you want more examples
than
> can be recounted here, take a look at Cicero's Philippics. The
view
> of Roman political rhetoric you seem to be advocating is very
> Victorian, but it doesn't accord well with the evidence from
> Republican Rome.
>
> Vale.
>
> Scaurus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48982 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: De censorum edicto
M. Hortensia Fl. Galerio Aureliano spd;
I'd be surprised too as no works of Cato the Younger are
extant. Are you just making this up as you go along?
Plutarch, Cicero, Cassius Dio, are sources for Cato Uticensis.

M. Hortensia Maior
Candidate for Tribune of the Plebs



I cannot recall in Cato the Younger's
> works any specific examples of calling another citizen rude, hick,
yokel, and
> stupid.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48983 From: M·C·C· Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
Salvete omnes civibus



Consul Tiberius Galerius Paulinus has called the Senate into session



Discussion will commence at 6:00 am, Roman time on ante diem VI Idus Februarias MMDCCLX a.u.c.(Thursday February 8, 2007) voting will commence at 6:am Roman Time on a.d. IV Id. Feb MMDCCLX a.u.c.(Saturday February 10, 2007) and will end at 6:am Roman Time on pr. Id. Ian. MMDCCLX a.u.c.(Monday February 12, 2007)

Item I ( As Consul Strabo and Censor Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus have suggested)

The Senate revokes the Senatus Consultum of 15 October 2757 in which the Senate recognized the Spanish Association "Provincia Hispania de Nova Roma" as part of Nova Roma..

Item II

Marcus Curiatius Complutensis is appointed Propraetor of Hispania (He was asked and he has agreed to serve.)

Item III

A letter shall be drafted to the citizens of Hispania letting them know that they are valued in Nova Romans and that we are willing to listen o their concerns.

The letter should also ask that if the NRHispania website was paid for by Nova Roman funds that it be turned over to our Propraetor for use by the Nova Roman province of Hispania. If it was not paid for by the province than the Senate will tender to the Propraetor the sums necessary to pay for a new one.

Item IV

A letter to the new association should respectfully ask that the new association refrain from using the name or logos of Nova Roma, Inc.

Item V

A. Moravia Aurelia is appointed as Propraetor of America Austroccidentalis.

Valete

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

SENATE AGENDA FINISHES

Valete bene

M�CVRIATIVS�COMPLVTENSIS
TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
SCRIBA CENSORIS GFBM
NOVA ROMA


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48984 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: Ways of Being Roman
Scaurus Hortensiae SPD.

> I'm happy to have a good discussion of Roman political culture,
> invective, qualities that Romans admired, exemplars of Roman
> character; good & bad!
> But I won't continue this silly duel with Aurelianus. If you
> want him vote for him , if you want me vote for me. Enough said.

I'm a patrician. I don't vote for tribunes. I had rather hoped these
exchanges weren't campaigning.

Vale.

Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48985 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: a.d. V Id. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem V Idus Februarius; haec dies nefastus est.

"[Fufetius speaks] 'Tullius, some god who keeps watch over both our
cities would seem, just as upon many other occasions, so especially in
what relates to this combat to have made his goodwill manifest. For
that the champions who are to fight on behalf of all their people
should be found inferior to none in birth, brave in arms, most comely
in appearance, and that they should furthermore have been born of one
father and mother, and, most wonderful of all, that they should have
come p59into the world on the same day, the Horatii with you and the
Curiatii with us, all this, I say, has every appearance of a
remarkable instance of divine favour. Why, therefore, do we not
accept this great providence of the god and each of us invite the
triplets on his side to engage in the combat for the supremacy? For
not only all the other advantages which we could desire in the
best-qualified champions are to be found in these men, but, as they
are brothers, they will be more unwilling than any others among either
the Romans or the Albans to forsake their companions when in distress;
and furthermore, the emulation of the other youths, which cannot
easily be appeased in any other way, will be promptly settled. For I
surmise that among you also, as well as among the Albans, there is a
kind of strife among many of those who lay claim to bravery; but if we
inform them that some providential fortune has anticipated all human
efforts and has itself furnished us with champions qualified to engage
upon equal terms in the cause of the cities, we shall easily persuade
them to desist. For they will then look upon themselves as inferior to
the triplets, not in point of bravery, but only in respect of a
special boon of Nature and of the favour of a Chance that is equally
inclined toward both sides.'" - Dionysius of Halicarnassus 3.14


"I will remember and not be unmindful of Apollo who shoots afar. As he
goes through the house of Zeus, the gods tremble before him and all
spring up from their seats when he draws near, as he bends his bright
bow. But Leto alone stays by the side of Zeus who delights in thunder;
and then she unstrings his bow, and closes his quiver, and takes his
archery from his strong shoulders in her hands and hangs them on a
golden peg against a pillar of his father's house. Then she leads him
to a seat and makes him sit: and the Father gives him nectar in a
golden cup welcoming his dear son, while the other gods make him sit
down there, and queenly Leto rejoices because she bare a mighty son
and an archer. Rejoice, blessed Leto, for you bare glorious children,
the lord Apollo and Artemis who delights in arrows; her in Ortygia,
and him in rocky Delos, as you rested against the great mass of the
Cynthian hill hard by a palm-tree by the streams of Inopus." - Homer,
Hymn to the Delian Apollo

In ancient Greece, today was dedicated to Apollo. The son of Zeus and
Leto, and the twin brother of Artemis. Apollo was the god of music
(principally the lyre, and he directed the choir of the Muses) and
also of prophecy, colonization, medicine, archery (but not for war or
hunting), poetry, dance, intellectual inquiry and the carer of herds
and flocks. He was also a god of light, known as "Phoebus" (radiant or
beaming, and he was sometimes identified with Helios the sun god). He
was also the god of plague and was worshiped as Smintheus (from
sminthos, rat) and as Parnopius (from parnops, grasshopper) and was
known as the destroyer of rats and locust, and according to Homer's
Iliad, Apollo shot arrows of plague into the Greek camp. Apollo being
the god of religious healing would give those guilty of murder and
other immoral deeds a ritual purification. Sacred to Apollo are the
swan (one legend says that Apollo flew on the back of a swan to the
land of the Hyperboreans, he would spend the winter months among
them), the wolf and the dolphin. His attributes are the bow and
arrows, on his head a laurel crown, and the cithara (or lyre) and
plectrum. But his most famous attribute is the tripod, the symbol of
his prophetic powers.

When the goddesss Hera, the wife of Zeus (it was he who had coupled
with Leto) found out about Leto's pregnancy, she was outraged with
jealousy. Seeking revenge Hera forced Leto to roam the earth in search
of a place to give birth. Sicne Hera had forbidden Leto to stay
anywhere on earth, either on terra-ferma or an island at sea, the only
place to seek shelter was Delos, being in the center of the Aegean,
and also difficult to reach, as there were strong under-currents,
because it was said to be a floating island. Because it was a floating
island, it was not considered either of Hera's prohibitions, and so
Leto was able to give birth to the divine twins Apollo and Artemis
(before Leto gave birth to Apollo, the island was encircled by a flock
of swans, this is why the swan was sacred to him). As a gesture of
thanks Delos was secured to the sea-bed by four columns to give it
stability, and from then on it became one of the most important
sanctuaries to Apollo. (A variation of Apollo's birth was that the
jealous Hera had incarcerated Ilithyia, the goddess of childbirth, but
the other gods intervened forcing Hera to release Ilithyia, which
allowed Leto to give birth).

"I sprang upon the ship in the form of a dolphin, pray to me as Apollo
Delphinius; also the altar itself shall be called Delphinius ..." -
Homer, Hymn to the Pythian Apollo 493

Apollo's first achievement was to rid Pytho (Delphi) of the serpent
(or dragon) Python. This monstrous beast protected the sanctuary of
Pytho from its lair beside the Castalian Spring. There it stood guard
while the "Sibyl" gave out her prophecies as she inhaled the trance
inducing vapors from an open chasm. Apollo killed Python with his bow
and arrows (Homer wrote "he killed the fearsome dragon Python,
piercing it with his darts"). Apollo not only took charge of the
oracle but rid the neighboring countryside of widespread destruction,
as Python had destroyed crops, sacked villages and polluted streams
and springs. However, to make amends for killing Python, as the
fearsome beast was the son of Gaia, Apollo had to serve king Admetus
for nine years (in some versions eight) as a cowherd. This he did, and
when he returned to Pytho he came in the guise of a dolphin bringing
with him priests from Crete (Apollo's cult title "Delphinios" meaning
dolphin or porpoise, is probably how Delphi was so named). After
killing Python and taking possession of the oracle, the god of light
(Phobus) became known as "Pythian Apollo". He dedicated a bronze
tripod to the sanctuary and bestowed divine powers on one of the
priestesses, and she became known as the "Pythia". It was she who
inhaled the hallucinating vapors from the fissure in the temple floor,
while she sat on a tripod chewing laurel leaves. After she mumbled her
answer, a male priest would translate it for the supplicant. Delphi
became the most important oracle center of Apollo, there were several
including Clarus and Branchidae.

Apollo, as with Zeus his father, had many love affairs with goddesses
and mortals. Apollo's infatuation for the nymph Daphne, which had been
invoked by the young god of love Eros, because Apollo had mocked him,
saying his archery skills were pathetic, and Apollo's singing had also
irritated him. Daphne was the beautiful daughter of the river god
Ladon, and she was constantly pursued by Apollo. To escape from
Apollo's insistent behavior, she fled to the mountains, but the
persistent Apollo followed her. Annoyed by this, she asked the river
god Peneus for help, which he did. As soon as Apollo approached
Daphne, he tried to embrace her, but when he stretched out his arms
she transformed into a laurel tree. Apollo, distraught by what had
happened, made the laurel his sacred tree. Apollo also loved Cyrene,
she was another nymph, and she bore Apollo a son: Aristaeus, a
demi-god, who became a protector of cattle and fruit trees, and a
deity of hunting, husbandry and bee-keeping. He taught men dairy
skills and the use of nets and traps in hunting.

The most famous mortal loves of Apollo was Hecuba, she was the wife of
Priam, the king of Troy. She bore him Troilius. Foretold by an oracle,
as long as Troilius reached the age of twenty, Troy could not be
defeated. But the hero Achilles ambushed and killed him, when the
young prince and his sister Polyxena secretly visited a spring. Apollo
also fell in love with Cassandra, the sister of Troilius, and daughter
of Hecuba and Priam. He seduced Cassandra on the promise that he would
teach her the art of prophecy, but having learnt the prophetic art she
rejected him. Apollo, being angry of her rejection punished her, by
declaring her prophecies never to be accepted or believed.

Asclepius, the god of healing, was also Apollo's offspring, after his
union with Coronis, who was daughter of Phlegyas, king of the Lapiths.
While she was pregnant by Apollo, Coronis fell in love with Ischys,
son of Elatus, but a crow informed Apollo of the affair. Apollo sent
his twin sister Artemis to kill Coronis, and Artemis carried out he
brothers wishes. While her body was burning on the funeral pyre,
Apollo removed the unborn child, and took him to Chiron, who raised
the child Asclepius.

Apollo also, as did his father Zeus, fall in love with one of his own
gender, Hyacinthus, a Spartan prince. He was very handsome and
athletic, which inflamed the passions of Apollo. One day while Apollo
and Hyacinthus were practicing throwing the discus, Zephyrus, the god
of the west wind, who was also attracted to the young prince, and
jealous of Apollo's amorous affection towards the boy, made the discus
veer off course by blowing an ill wind. The discus, which Apollo had
thrown, hit Hyacinthus, smashing his skull. Apollo rushed to him, but
he was dead. The god was overcome with grief, but to immortalize the
love he had for the beautiful youth, he had a flower grow were his
blood had stained the earth. Apollo also loved the young boy
Cyparissus, a descendant of Heracles. The impassioned Apollo gave
Cyparissus a sacred deer, as a love token. The young deer became tame,
and was the constant companion of the boy, until a tragic accident
occurred. As the young deer lay sleeping in the shade of the
undergrowth, Cyparissus threw his javelin, which by chance hit, and
killed the deer. Grief-stricken by what had happened, Cyparissus
wanted to die. He asked Apollo to let his tears fall for all eternity.
With apprehension Apollo transformed the boy into a tree, the cypress,
which became the symbol of sorrow, as the sap on its trunk forms
droplets, like tears.

Apollo could also be ruthless when he was angered. The mortal Niobe,
boasted to Apollo's mother Leto, that she had fourteen children (in
some versions six or seven), which must make her more superior than
Leto, who had only bore two. Apollo greatly angered by this slew her
sons, and Artemis killed Niobe's daughters. Niobe wept so much that
she turned into a pillar of stone. Apollo was infuriated when the
satyr Marsyas challenged Apollo to music contest. After winning the
competition, Apollo had Marsyas flayed alive, for being so
presumptuous, as to challenge a god.

Apollo was worshiped throughout the Greek world, and at Delphi every
four years they held the Pythian Games in his honor. He had many
epithets, including "Pythian Apollo" (his name at Delphi), "Apollo
Apotropaeus" (Apollo who averts evil), and "Apollo Nymphegetes"
(Apollo who looks after the Nymphs). As the god of shepherds he also
had the cult titles "Lukeios" (from lykos; wolf), protecting the
flocks from wolfs, and "Nomius" (of pastures, belonging to shepherds).
Being the god of colonists, Apollo influenced his priests at Delphi to
give divine guidance, as to where the expedition should proceed. This
was during the height of the colonizing era circa 750-550 BC.
Apollo's title was "Archigetes" (leader of colonists). According to
one legend, it was Apollo who helped either Cretan or Arcadian
colonists found the city of Troy.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Apollo
(http://ancienthistory.about.com/od/apollomyth/) and
(http://forum.kusadasi.biz/thread32.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48986 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Looters halted in Spain
Agricola Omnibus sal.


Headline: Spain police smash 'relic ring'

"Spanish police have arrested 52 people and seized 300,000
archaeological artefacts they describe as "of great historic and
economic value"."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6341887.stm


I would like to remind everyone to exercise caution when buying
ancient artifacts. There are many fakes out there, and many looted
items. Looting takes items out of archeological context, and looters
may destroy important artifacts or information in an effort to get
"sellable" items. Buying from a reputable seller is the wisest course,
in my opinion.

Optime valete!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48987 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: Ways of Being Roman--Nope, definitely not campaigning.
Nope. Definitely not campaigning. Just my usual objection and vocal response to anyone who is constantly unpleasant, evasive, and contradictory on the list. I used to do the same sort of thing with Corvus and Drusus but so did a lot of other citizens who found them to be unpleasant, evasive, rude, and contradictory. Odd, how they are no longer active or holding office in Nova Roma but I am still here. Obviously a lack of staying power or an inability to change bad habits in the face of vocal disagreement.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus


-----Original Message-----
From: gregory.rose@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 3:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Ways of Being Roman


Scaurus Hortensiae SPD.

> I'm happy to have a good discussion of Roman political culture,
> invective, qualities that Romans admired, exemplars of Roman
> character; good & bad!
> But I won't continue this silly duel with Aurelianus. If you
> want him vote for him , if you want me vote for me. Enough said.

I'm a patrician. I don't vote for tribunes. I had rather hoped these
exchanges weren't campaigning.

Vale.

Scaurus


________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48988 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: To Marca Hortensia
Aurelianus Scauro sal.

Not every practice of ancient Rome is worthy of imitation in Nova Roma. It may be possible for some individuals to toss out reasonable dialogue and modern civility easily but it comes hard to those of us who were raised in the old Southern manner. I will be the first to admit that I use both humor and wit to argue with those with whom I disagree but I cannot see the value in spreading gossip and innuendo. If I want to say that someone is being unpleasant, I am just going to say it and cite the appropriate examples.

Also, let the two of us be precise. You write "Cato the Younger is said to have been one who spread the rumour that Caesar offered his arse to the king of Bithynia for a fleet in his younger days." Did you actually draw this from a specific work of Cato the Younger? If so, which work, what edition, what page? Or is this something that another ancient writer wrote about Cato the Younger or is it the opinion of a modern author? Or is this your opinion based on something that you read?

As I posted to Marca Hortensia, I cannot recall an example of my reading of Cato the Younger where he was deliberately rude and obnoxious but I can say that he used some wit in his comments about certain other Romans and foreigners in his time.

Vale.


-----Original Message-----
From: gregory.rose@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] To Marca Hortensia


Scaurus Aureliano SPD.

Cato the Younger is said to have been one who spread the rumour that
Caesar offered his arse to the king of Bithynia for a fleet in his
younger days. Being accused of playing the catamite for
political-military advantage is rather more potent stuff than being
called a hick. Roman political rhetoric was often filled with
invective and often sexual invective. If you want more examples than
can be recounted here, take a look at Cicero's Philippics. The view
of Roman political rhetoric you seem to be advocating is very
Victorian, but it doesn't accord well with the evidence from
Republican Rome.

Vale.

Scaurus


________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48989 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Apologies
Aurelianus Scauro et Marca Hortensia sal.

I have made an error. It has been some time since I read Plutarch's Fall of the Roman Republic and Lucan's surviving sections of The Pharsalia. I had drawn all of my memories and impressions of Cato the Younger from these works. I visualized him as a staunch Republican who did may have introduced the 'filibuster' to history, frequently supported M. Tullius Cicero (even when in the wrong), and as a very conservative, old style Roman.

Scauro, if you drew your comment about Caesar & the King of Bithynia from Plutarch, I cannot recall reading that but it may be that you drew it from Sallust. I always considered Sallust to be more interested in a good story and juicy gossip (in the vein of Herodotus) rather than a more serious commentator like Thucydides.

Marca Hortensia, you were correct in your comment about the existing works of Cato the Younger. It was my error and you have my apology on that point. However, I still do not recall anything in Cato the Younger's described behavior that would lead me to believe that your behavior should be compared to his.

I do not make this up as I go along. I make mistakes and sometimes get something mixed up but I am usually willing to admit it.

Vale.


-----Original Message-----
From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 8:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Ways of Being Roman--Nope, definitely not campaigning.


Nope. Definitely not campaigning. Just my usual objection and vocal response to anyone who is constantly unpleasant, evasive, and contradictory on the list. I used to do the same sort of thing with Corvus and Drusus but so did a lot of other citizens who found them to be unpleasant, evasive, rude, and contradictory. Odd, how they are no longer active or holding office in Nova Roma but I am still here. Obviously a lack of staying power or an inability to change bad habits in the face of vocal disagreement.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus


-----Original Message-----
From: gregory.rose@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 3:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Ways of Being Roman

Scaurus Hortensiae SPD.

> I'm happy to have a good discussion of Roman political culture,
> invective, qualities that Romans admired, exemplars of Roman
> character; good & bad!
> But I won't continue this silly duel with Aurelianus. If you
> want him vote for him , if you want me vote for me. Enough said.

I'm a patrician. I don't vote for tribunes. I had rather hoped these
exchanges weren't campaigning.

Vale.

Scaurus

__________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48990 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: To Marca Hortensia
Scaurus Aureliano SPD.

> Also, let the two of us be precise. You write "Cato the Younger is said to
> have been one who spread the rumour that Caesar offered his arse to the king
> of Bithynia for a fleet in his younger days." Did you actually draw this
> from a specific work of Cato the Younger? If so, which work, what edition,
> what page? Or is this something that another ancient writer wrote about Cato
> the Younger or is it the opinion of a modern author? Or is this your opinion
> based on something that you read?

Cicero refers to it in a letter. There is so vanishingly little of
Cato the Younger's writings and speeches extant that I wonder how you
can make inferences about his rhetorical style without reference to
other contemporary and historical literary sources.

Vale.

Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48991 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Campaigning vs. Not Campaigning for Tribune of the Plebs
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus sal.

In a recent post, Scaurus Pontifex asked if my recent exchanges with
Marca Hortensia represented our campaigns for the office of Tribune of
the Plebs. I told him that it did not, but was just my usual
objection and response to those who are, in my opinion, unnecessarily
rude or unpleasant on the NR Lists.

An example of one of my campaign posts would be the one I posted
entitled--Constitutional Duties of the Tribune of the Plebs. In that
post, I printed information from the current NR Constitution on the
duties, powers, and obligations of the Tribunes of the Plebs along
with how I interpreted those powers. I also stated how I would work
with and communicate with my fellow Tribunes should the citizens of
Nova Roma elect me to that office. This email is also a campaign
post.

I also stated that I am not a strict Roman reconstructionist. I
recognize that for Nova Roma to grow and prosper, there are going to
have to be some compromises made to accommodate modern ways of thought
and action. I do value the Roman Virtues, both public & private,
while also honoring the virtues & code of behavior that were instilled
in me by my family growing up in the Southern United States. I have
both my detractors and supporters relating to some of my methods of
manner and etiquette.

Last year, I gave my public oath that I would not run for office in
the central administration of Nova Roma during 2006 C.E. Both during
the campaign then and during the period when Marca Hortensia declared
her candidacy for Tribune, I was encouraged by others to make a run
for office because there were both a lack of qualified candidates and
it was felt I could serve Nova Roma. I could not break my oath
regardless of that encouragement.

I posted to the list that there were surely other candidates available
to run for Tribune but none stepped foward. I dearly wanted to
challenge Marca Hortensia but I could not break my oath. That is the
kind of Nova Roman that I am. An oath is a sacred covenant between a
person and Dii Immortales.

Now we have a new year and I AM running for Tribune of the Plebs. I
encourage all the Plebs to cast your vote for me. I swear to you that
I would do my very best to fulfill the duties and obligations of this
office. I would communicate with my fellow Tribunes to insure that no
intercessio is used without serious consideration. I would endeavor
to work with the Senate to see that the People are informed of all of
their deliberations in accordance with the NR Constitution. I will
continue to promote the Roman Virtues and act to promote Nova Roma so
our organization will continue to grow & prosper. I will continue to
encourage others to act with civility and moderation in their actions
and their communications on the NR Lists as a private citizen & a
magistrate.

About my opponent--I can say without hesitation that if Marca
Hortensia is elected, Nova Roma will get an experienced Tribune with
drive & an ambition to serve. That is just the sort of person that
you find in abundance down here in America Austrorientalis. However,
I do not agree with the way that she communicates with others on the
ML nor did I agree with the way that she encouraged the Tribunes to
act against their sworn obligations & official duties in a matter
related to the Collegium Pontificum. I believe she lacks moderation
and good judgment in her character that would be a requirement to hold
the office of Tribune of the Plebs.

Vote for me, Flavius Galerius Aurelianus, for Tribune. VB ORP.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48992 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: Looters halted in Spain
Salve Agricola,

I think the governments need to get to the point where their bite is
harder than their bark.As an example, about two years ago a Canadian
tourist in Mexico took a piece of tile that lay near one of the
pyramids. He got caught and sat in jail for a few months. After some
negotiation, he was fined 3500.00 US and sent home. Now that is good
incentive. Old Quintus will not be touching any archeological scraps
or chips and things when he goes to Mexico this year!

Regards,

QSP









--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola"
<wm_hogue@...> wrote:
>
> Agricola Omnibus sal.
>
>
> Headline: Spain police smash 'relic ring'
>
> "Spanish police have arrested 52 people and seized 300,000
> archaeological artefacts they describe as "of great historic and
> economic value"."
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6341887.stm
>
>
> I would like to remind everyone to exercise caution when buying
> ancient artifacts. There are many fakes out there, and many looted
> items. Looting takes items out of archeological context, and
looters
> may destroy important artifacts or information in an effort to get
> "sellable" items. Buying from a reputable seller is the wisest
course,
> in my opinion.
>
> Optime valete!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48993 From: Inigo Fernandez Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: Looters halted in Spain
Salve, Quintus and Agricola:

In fact this is a big problem in México. We have a lot of ruins ans no money
to have enough security in all the archeological sites so is very easy to
buy original prehispanic pieces. If you go to Monte Albán (in Oaxaca) you
would find pesaents (yes, peasents!) that are selling to the tourists the
pieces they found when they are working in their lands. Others, of course,
make the pieces at home and sell the copies as originals.

Also, is easy to find people willing to receive a bribery to help you to get
out of the country lots of prehispanic pieces of all the sizes. In the last
years the federal goverment has been working to stop the this kind of
traffic but is impossible to reach this goal if part of the problem is
inside the goverment: the corruption of the public servants.

So, it seems that an archeological wealth is more a curse than a bless.

Optime Valete.

Caius Iulius Adventor









On 2/9/07, Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly) <mjk@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Agricola,
>
> I think the governments need to get to the point where their bite is
> harder than their bark.As an example, about two years ago a Canadian
> tourist in Mexico took a piece of tile that lay near one of the
> pyramids. He got caught and sat in jail for a few months. After some
> negotiation, he was fined 3500.00 US and sent home. Now that is good
> incentive. Old Quintus will not be touching any archeological scraps
> or chips and things when he goes to Mexico this year!
>
> Regards,
>
> QSP
>
> ---
> .
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48994 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
M. Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
this is deeply sad, to see Provincia Hispania secede.
What could we have done, what should we do in the future to make
sure this doesn't happen agains & to restore our ties with Hispania.
I hope this summer many of us will go to the Conventus in
Merida and renew & make new ties with the Hispani. There are a most
active province.
bene valete
M. Hortensia Maior
producer "Vox Romana"
http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/
Candidate for Tribune of the Plebs

> The Senate revokes the Senatus Consultum of 15 October 2757 in
which the Senate recognized the Spanish Association "Provincia
Hispania de Nova Roma" as part of Nova Roma..
>
> Item II
>
> Marcus Curiatius Complutensis is appointed Propraetor of Hispania
(He was asked and he has agreed to serve.)
>
> Item III
>
> A letter shall be drafted to the citizens of Hispania letting them
know that they are valued in Nova Romans and that we are willing to
listen o their concerns.
>
> The letter should also ask that if the NRHispania website was paid
for by Nova Roman funds that it be turned over to our Propraetor for
use by the Nova Roman province of Hispania. If it was not paid for
by the province than the Senate will tender to the Propraetor the
sums necessary to pay for a new one.
>
> Item IV
>
> A letter to the new association should respectfully ask that the
new association refrain from using the name or logos of Nova Roma,
Inc.
>
> Item V
>
> A. Moravia Aurelia is appointed as Propraetor of America
Austroccidentalis.
>
> Valete
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
> SENATE AGENDA FINISHES
>
> Valete bene
>
> M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
> TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
> SCRIBA CENSORIS GFBM
> NOVA ROMA
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48995 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
Salve Marca Hortensia, et salvete omnes,

M. Hortensia writes:

> this is deeply sad, to see Provincia Hispania secede.

Hispania has not seceded. The cultural association created to represent Nova
Roma in Spain has chosen to separate itself from Nova Roma, though all of its
members who are citizens of Nova Roma remain citizens. Please don't make this
unfortunate matter worse than it is by using polarizing language to describe
it.

> What could we have done, what should we do in the future to make
> sure this doesn't happen agains & to restore our ties with Hispania.

Obviously the Senate is considering these questions. More I can not say.

Again, this is not a situation that will be improved by forum speculation.

Vale, et valete,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48996 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
M. Hortensia Gn. Equitio Quritibus spd;
The cultural association has left NR so how many cives of
Hispania are remaining in Nova Roma? I'm not going to massage the
facts for the quirites...

And I'm not polarizing I used to read that language regularly on the
NRHispania list. I like the Hispani a lot. I've good friends there.
I for sure am glad you can belong to both groups.

But we jolly well should talk about Europe, many times this seems
such an U.S. list. We need to talk to the Provincias & see what they
want & aren't getting from NR, this talk is long overdue. And we
should not stifle discussion.

I just read over at NR Italia about disconent that there is no
Italian pontifex, this person made a good point. I'm sure no one
here know this.
bene valete in pacem deorum
M. Hortensia Maior




> Hispania has not seceded. The cultural association created to
represent Nova
> Roma in Spain has chosen to separate itself from Nova Roma, though
all of its
> members who are citizens of Nova Roma remain citizens. Please
don't make this
> unfortunate matter worse than it is by using polarizing language
to describe
> it.
>
> > What could we have done, what should we do in the future to make
> > sure this doesn't happen agains & to restore our ties with
Hispania.
>
> Obviously the Senate is considering these questions. More I can
not say.
>
> Again, this is not a situation that will be improved by forum
speculation.
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48997 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
Salvete,

Looking at the nrhispania website it seems that the website is being
used at least in part for the cultural association and not the
Provincia proper. This is an administrative matter. I met some
wonderful and dedicated citizens from Hispania at the Conventus in
Roma, and recently we have added a business from Hispania to the
Macellum. It is probably more a matter of expanding interest in Roma
Antiqua than anything else, and for that we should be glad.

I don't know yet if my schedule will permit it, but I hope to attend
the Conventus in Hispania later this year and renew acquaintance with
many citizens of Hispania.

Optime valete

Agricola


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Marca Hortensia, et salvete omnes,
>
> M. Hortensia writes:
>
> > this is deeply sad, to see Provincia Hispania secede.
>
> Hispania has not seceded. The cultural association created to
represent Nova
> Roma in Spain has chosen to separate itself from Nova Roma, though
all of its
> members who are citizens of Nova Roma remain citizens. Please don't
make this
> unfortunate matter worse than it is by using polarizing language to
describe
> it.
>
> > What could we have done, what should we do in the future to make
> > sure this doesn't happen agains & to restore our ties with Hispania.
>
> Obviously the Senate is considering these questions. More I can not
say.
>
> Again, this is not a situation that will be improved by forum
speculation.
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48998 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus S.P.D.

Obviously there must still be NR citizens in Hispania or one would
not have asked to be & accepted as a candidate for gubernator. The
questions about why any group would secede from the parent
organization could be explained by the Nova Romans who left to form
SVR or when Britannia seceded.

I would be interested in hearing from Astvr Pontifex as to the
reasons for this situation in Hispania. However, I am willing to
wait until the Tribunes announce the deliberations and outcome of
the Senate. I recommend that the Plebs follow this course of action
to avoid unnecessary strife, rumor, and innuendo.

Valete.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia Gn. Equitio Quritibus spd;
> The cultural association has left NR so how many cives of
> Hispania are remaining in Nova Roma? I'm not going to massage the
> facts for the quirites...
>
> And I'm not polarizing I used to read that language regularly on
the
> NRHispania list. I like the Hispani a lot. I've good friends
there.
> I for sure am glad you can belong to both groups.
>
> But we jolly well should talk about Europe, many times this seems
> such an U.S. list. We need to talk to the Provincias & see what
they
> want & aren't getting from NR, this talk is long overdue. And we
> should not stifle discussion.
>
> I just read over at NR Italia about disconent that there is no
> Italian pontifex, this person made a good point. I'm sure no one
> here know this.
> bene valete in pacem deorum
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
>
>
>
> > Hispania has not seceded. The cultural association created to
> represent Nova
> > Roma in Spain has chosen to separate itself from Nova Roma,
though
> all of its
> > members who are citizens of Nova Roma remain citizens. Please
> don't make this
> > unfortunate matter worse than it is by using polarizing language
> to describe
> > it.
> >
> > > What could we have done, what should we do in the future to
make
> > > sure this doesn't happen agains & to restore our ties with
> Hispania.
> >
> > Obviously the Senate is considering these questions. More I can
> not say.
> >
> > Again, this is not a situation that will be improved by forum
> speculation.
> >
> > Vale, et valete,
> >
> > CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 48999 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: Ways of Being Roman
M. Hortensia Iulio Scauro sal;
Since I wrote my blast to Graecus & Aurelianus pops up to
give me the once over & prominenly puts my name in the subject line
of the ML, I figured yes it's campaign time.

Anyway though it is just as you say, Roman politics was not for the
weak or timid. All kinds of sexual accusations were tossed about. If
you read Cicero's speeches he utterly villifies people right & left
to get his client off. Tribunes of the Plebs were known for being
fiery & loud;-) Romans in public political life were pretty
cutthroat.
Ah there we go, look at below; there he goes flinging the
mud. Hey I'm not the one who claimed to have read all the works of
Cato Uticensis...lol
Maior
>
> Nope. Definitely not campaigning. Just my usual objection and
vocal response to anyone who is constantly unpleasant, evasive, and
contradictory on the list.
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
>
>
>
>
> I'm a patrician. I don't vote for tribunes. I had rather hoped
these
> exchanges weren't campaigning.
>
> Vale.
>
> Scaurus
>
>
>
_____________________________________________________________________
___
> Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and
security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from
across the web, free AOL Mail and more.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49000 From: Diana Aventina Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
Salve Marinus,

<Hispania has not seceded. The cultural association created to represent
Nova
<Roma in Spain has chosen to separate itself from Nova Roma, though all of
its
<members who are citizens of Nova Roma remain citizens.

I find this confusing. How can they be separate and still be a part of us?
If the website needs to be turned over to NR and there is a new NR
Proprateor of Spain, and the Senatus Consultum that made them a Provincia is
being revoked, then it seems to me that they're separate from NR. The
citizens sound like they will be citizens of NR in name only.
And I'm not really surprised. If the bulk of a provincia's citizenship does
not speak English, then what benefits are they getting from being a citizen
of NR? They only get a lot of rules and laws (and having to suffer through
translating them) and none of the fun comraderie that we all have on the
various English language lists.

Vale,
Diana
(whose broken elbow has healed enough to type for short periods of time.)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49001 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
Diana Aventina <diana@...> writes:

> I find this confusing. How can they be separate and still be a part of us?

The legal entity created originally to represent Nova Roma in provincia
Hispania has been taken over by a majority of non-citizens. They've voted to
rename their cultural association and separate the cultural association from
Nova Roma. The Senate is now, as you've seen from the agenda, considering a
senatus consultum withdrawing our recognition of that cultural association
since its purpose has changed.

> If the website needs to be turned over to NR and there is a new NR
> Proprateor of Spain, and the Senatus Consultum that made them a Provincia
> is being revoked,

Nobody is considering revocation of the provincial status of Hispania. What's
up for a vote is a straightforward separation between Nova Roma and a Spanish
cultural association which no longer wants to associate with Nova Roma. The
Nova Roman citizens in that association intend to remain part of Nova Roma.

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49002 From: M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS• QVIRITVBVS•S•P•D

SALVETE OMNES,

S.V.B.E.E.V.!

It is much too long my friends since I have been amongst you.

Since last I had the honour of speaking with you, I have travelled
to AFRICA PROCONSVLARIS (Tunisia) and to the VRBS, our beloved ROMA
ÆTERNA!

AhhÂ…. "TERRARVM DEA GENTIVMQVE, ROMA CVI PAR EST NIHIL ET NIHIL
SECNDVM!"

On browsing the ML, I notice with not a little concern, that there
is much talk of PROVINCIÆ VIZ. HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA seceding from
the RES PVBLICA!

QVIRITES! Please excuse my ignorance, but what in the name of the
gods, has befallen the RES PVBLICA?!

I have no doubt that our PATRES ET CONSCRIPTI will deliberate
judiciously on this grave matter and I pray that IVPPITER OPTIMVS
MAXIMVS will aid and guide them in their decisions for the people of
Rome.

I am, perhaps, the least worthy of all to proffer a view on this
very serious issue but if I may be permitted to say humbly as a
CIVIS a few brief words.

Honourable MARINVS has elucidated, I am relieved to hear, that the
constitutional/ provincial position of HISPANIA is not under
consideration. That, in my humble opinion, is a matter for the
entire Roman people and state and not any particular grouping of
CIVES acting uilaterally. That said, why then is the SC originally
establishing that PROVINCIA being proposed for revocation? I
beseech you to please forgive my obvious ignorance?!

Of concern, surely, must be the factors leading to the circumstances
where both PROVINCIÆ are mentioned in the same breath as
secession?! I fear Diana (AVE DIANA!) may well have hit upon
something in her comments below?

I may be taking a very simplistic view, but as I see it there is
only one fundamental question to be answered VIZ. do those involved
wish to be CIVES of Rome reborn (NR) or not? Once this is
established beyond doubt then allocation/ affiliation to the
appropriate PROVINCIA should be a mere formality!

I earnestly hope that I have not offended anyone, least of all our
CIVES from HISPANIA or BRITANNIA.

Surely, we are all citizens of Rome first and members of a PROVINCIA
second?

CVRATE VT VALEASTIS

M•CALIDIVS•M•F•M•N•M•PR•PAL•GRACCHVS
CIVIS NOVÆ ROMÆ

VERITAS•LVX•MEA

L•ARMINIVS•Ti• GALERIO COS.‡
(MMDCCLX A•V•C)

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Diana Aventina <diana@...> writes:
>
> > I find this confusing. How can they be separate and still be a
part of us?
>
> The legal entity created originally to represent Nova Roma in
provincia
> Hispania has been taken over by a majority of non-citizens.
They've voted to
> rename their cultural association and separate the cultural
association from
> Nova Roma. The Senate is now, as you've seen from the agenda,
considering a
> senatus consultum withdrawing our recognition of that cultural
association
> since its purpose has changed.
>
> > If the website needs to be turned over to NR and there is a new
NR
> > Proprateor of Spain, and the Senatus Consultum that made them a
Provincia
> > is being revoked,
>
> Nobody is considering revocation of the provincial status of
Hispania. What's
> up for a vote is a straightforward separation between Nova Roma
and a Spanish
> cultural association which no longer wants to associate with Nova
Roma. The
> Nova Roman citizens in that association intend to remain part of
Nova Roma.
>
> CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49003 From: M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS• QVIRITVBVS•S•P•D

SALVETE OMNES,

S.V.B.E.E.V.!

It is much too long my friends since I have been amongst you.

Since last I had the honour of speaking with you, I have travelled
to AFRICA PROCONSVLARIS (Tunisia) and to the VRBS, our beloved ROMA
ÆTERNA!

AhhÂ…. "TERRARVM DEA GENTIVMQVE, ROMA CVI PAR EST NIHIL ET NIHIL
SECNDVM!"

On browsing the ML, I notice with not a little concern, that there
is much talk of PROVINCIÆ VIZ. HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA seceding from
the RES PVBLICA!

QVIRITES! Please excuse my ignorance, but what in the name of the
gods, has befallen the RES PVBLICA?!

I have no doubt that our PATRES ET CONSCRIPTI will deliberate
judiciously on this grave matter and I pray that IVPPITER OPTIMVS
MAXIMVS will aid and guide them in their decisions for the people of
Rome.

I am, perhaps, the least worthy of all to proffer a view on this
very serious issue but if I may be permitted to say humbly as a
CIVIS a few brief words.

Honourable MARINVS has elucidated, I am relieved to hear, that the
constitutional/ provincial position of HISPANIA is not under
consideration. That, in my humble opinion, is a matter for the
entire Roman people and state and not any particular grouping of
CIVES acting uilaterally. That said, why then is the SC originally
establishing that PROVINCIA being proposed for revocation? I
beseech you to please forgive my obvious ignorance?!

Of concern, surely, must be the factors leading to the circumstances
where both PROVINCIÆ are mentioned in the same breath as
secession?! I fear Diana (AVE DIANA!) may well have hit upon
something in her comments below?

I may be taking a very simplistic view, but as I see it there is
only one fundamental question to be answered VIZ. do those involved
wish to be CIVES of Rome reborn (NR) or not? Once this is
established beyond doubt then allocation/ affiliation to the
appropriate PROVINCIA should be a mere formality!

I earnestly hope that I have not offended anyone, least of all our
CIVES from HISPANIA or BRITANNIA.

Surely, we are all citizens of Rome first and members of a PROVINCIA
second?

CVRATE VT VALEASTIS

M•CALIDIVS•M•F•M•N•M•PR•PAL•GRACCHVS
CIVIS NOVÆ ROMÆ

VERITAS•LVX•MEA

L•ARMINIVS•Ti• GALERIO COS.‡
(MMDCCLX A•V•C)



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Diana Aventina <diana@...> writes:
>
> > I find this confusing. How can they be separate and still be a
part of us?
>
> The legal entity created originally to represent Nova Roma in
provincia
> Hispania has been taken over by a majority of non-citizens.
They've voted to
> rename their cultural association and separate the cultural
association from
> Nova Roma. The Senate is now, as you've seen from the agenda,
considering a
> senatus consultum withdrawing our recognition of that cultural
association
> since its purpose has changed.
>
> > If the website needs to be turned over to NR and there is a new
NR
> > Proprateor of Spain, and the Senatus Consultum that made them a
Provincia
> > is being revoked,
>
> Nobody is considering revocation of the provincial status of
Hispania. What's
> up for a vote is a straightforward separation between Nova Roma
and a Spanish
> cultural association which no longer wants to associate with Nova
Roma. The
> Nova Roman citizens in that association intend to remain part of
Nova Roma.
>
> CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49004 From: M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS• QVIRITVBVS•S•P•D

SALVETE OMNES,

S.V.B.E.E.V.!

It is much too long my friends since I have been amongst you.

Since last I had the honour of speaking with you, I have travelled
to AFRICA PROCONSVLARIS (Tunisia) and to the VRBS, our beloved ROMA
ÆTERNA!

AhhÂ…. "TERRARVM DEA GENTIVMQVE, ROMA CVI PAR EST NIHIL ET NIHIL
SECNDVM!"

On browsing the ML, I notice with not a little concern, that there
is much talk of PROVINCIÆ VIZ. HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA seceding from
the RES PVBLICA!

QVIRITES! Please excuse my ignorance, but what in the name of the
gods, has befallen the RES PVBLICA?!

I have no doubt that our PATRES ET CONSCRIPTI will deliberate
judiciously on this grave matter and I pray that IVPPITER OPTIMVS
MAXIMVS will aid and guide them in their decisions for the people of
Rome.

I am, perhaps, the least worthy of all to proffer a view on this
very serious issue but if I may be permitted to say humbly as a
CIVIS a few brief words.

Honourable MARINVS has elucidated, I am relieved to hear, that the
constitutional/ provincial position of HISPANIA is not under
consideration. That, in my humble opinion, is a matter for the
entire Roman people and state and not any particular grouping of
CIVES acting uilaterally. That said, why then is the SC originally
establishing that PROVINCIA being proposed for revocation? I
beseech you to please forgive my obvious ignorance?!

Of concern, surely, must be the factors leading to the circumstances
where both PROVINCIÆ are mentioned in the same breath as
secession?! I fear Diana (AVE DIANA!) may well have hit upon
something in her comments below?

I may be taking a very simplistic view, but as I see it there is
only one fundamental question to be answered VIZ. do those involved
wish to be CIVES of Rome reborn (NR) or not? Once this is
established beyond doubt then allocation/ affiliation to the
appropriate PROVINCIA should be a mere formality!

I earnestly hope that I have not offended anyone, least of all our
CIVES from HISPANIA or BRITANNIA.

Surely, we are all citizens of Rome first and members of a PROVINCIA
second?

CVRATE VT VALEASTIS

M•CALIDIVS•M•F•M•N•M•PR•PAL•GRACCHVS
CIVIS NOVÆ ROMÆ

VERITAS•LVX•MEA

L•ARMINIVS•Ti• GALERIO COS.‡
(MMDCCLX A•V•C)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49005 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
Salve M•CALIDI•GRACCHI,

It is good to see you back as always and hope you had a great
adventure!

Senator Marinus put the situation in a nutshell in his last post.
I'm not at liberty to go into Senate discussions and proceedings but I
can say that over my many years I have seen that such situations are
so common place in all the cultural associations I to which I have
belonged.

Always there are those who come along with different ideas and visions
as to how things should be evolving and eventually pull out, take a
handful more or less of the members and try starting there own new
association, parallel to the other. As they say, when you get five or
more people in a group there is always potential for conflict,
differences and parting of the ways. You do nevertheless, have to
carry on, learn from mistakes and make corrections but at the same
time say full speed ahead and damn the torpedoes as some famous
Admiral once said.

Nova Roma is not unique in this situation and in any venture be it
business or social organizations in life you are not going to please
everyone and often when you try pleasing everyone you please no one.
After coming to this conclusion over the years I therefore take such
situations calmly.

Regards,

QSP



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS
<cybernaut911@...> wrote:
>
> M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS• QVIRITVBVS•S•P•D
>
> SALVETE OMNES,
>
> S.V.B.E.E.V.!
>
> It is much too long my friends since I have been amongst you.
>
> Since last I had the honour of speaking with you, I have travelled
> to AFRICA PROCONSVLARIS (Tunisia) and to the VRBS, our beloved ROMA
> ÆTERNA!
>
>Snip for condensation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49006 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Title's of City Officer's
Salve,

Do any of you know what the equivalent Roman titles would be for
these modern, civic titles?

Mayor & Vice Mayor (also known in KS as 'President of the Council')
or City Council Member.

Vale,

Quintus Servilius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49007 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: Title's of City Officer's
SALVE !

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Charlie Collins <camulorix@...>
wrote:
> Do any of you know what the equivalent Roman titles would be for
> these modern, civic titles?
> Mayor & Vice Mayor (also known in KS as 'President of the Council')
> or City Council Member.>>>

Maybe this can help :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decurion_%28administrative%29

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49008 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: Title's of City Officer's
SALVE !

Sorry, I saw later that your question has two parts.
The complete answer is :

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Charlie Collins <camulorix@...>
wrote:
> Do any of you know what the equivalent Roman titles would be for
> these modern, civic titles?
> Mayor & Vice Mayor(also known in KS as 'President of the Council)>>>
Duumviri.

> or City Council Member.>>>
Decurion.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49009 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: Re: Ways of Being Roman
Fl. Galerius Marca Hortensia sal.

As I recall, the results of Marcus Tullius Cicero's slinging mud on his
political opponents & encouraging illegal actions (such as allowing the death of
other Romans) was that he was eventually put to death. If that is how Roman
you want to be, you are more than welcome to pursue that particular course of
action. As for myself, I would prefer the a life more in keeping with
Horace's "aurem mediocritas."

Vale.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49010 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2007-02-09
Subject: RE :Italian pontifex
> I just read over at NR Italia about disconent that there is no
> Italian pontifex, this person made a good point. I'm sure no one
> here know this.
> bene valete in pacem deorum
> M. Hortensia Maior

Salve
My dear M. Hortensia Maior
RE :Italian pontifex

well when i was a pontifex we never got a request from there .
there has to be a request from the person willing to be a pontifex.
and as far as I know there has never been a request from any Italian
to be pontifex
are they waiting to be told "you XYZ Civi you are a Italian, does not
work that way.
you need to tell them they have to ask,then they have to give poof
that the person asking has the knowhow and the books and is going to
be a recon etc.

vale
Marcus Cornelius Felix
Sacerdos Templi Mercurius
Primus Sacerdotus Provincia America Boreoccidentalis

House Priest Patrician Gens Cornelia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49011 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
Salve Gracche,

M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS <cybernaut911@...> writes:

> why then is the SC originally
> establishing that PROVINCIA being proposed for revocation?

You misunderstand. The senatus consultum that is being considered for
revocation is *not* the one that created the province of Hispania. It's a
subsequent consultum which recognized a specific Spanish cultural association
as being the legal representative of Nova Roma in Spain. That cultural
association has now voted to separate itself from us, so we are proposing to
withdraw our recognition from it. That's all.

> do those involved wish to be CIVES of Rome reborn (NR) or not?

All of the Nova Roman citizens in Hispania remain Nova Roman citizens. The
problem seems to be that the cultural association allowed non-citizens to
join it as voting members. They grew to a majority, and have now voted
themselves out.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49012 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: RE :Italian pontifex
M. Hortensia M. Cornelio spd;
one of the problems is language. If you don't speak
English, you really won't make the request unless there is an
outreach. I'm sure there are cultores in Italia who would love to be
sacerdotes, & scholarly Latin reading ones to be pontifices.
Certainly I'm sorry to see that our own PM still does not speak
Latin.
Speaking Latin, having one universal language is probably
one of the most important efforts we should make for Nova Roma. It
really would make us one community.
> bene valete
M. Hortensia Maior

> >
> Salve
> My dear M. Hortensia Maior
> RE :Italian pontifex
>
> well when i was a pontifex we never got a request from there .
> there has to be a request from the person willing to be a pontifex.
> and as far as I know there has never been a request from any
Italian
> to be pontifex
> are they waiting to be told "you XYZ Civi you are a Italian, does
not
> work that way.
> you need to tell them they have to ask,then they have to give poof
> that the person asking has the knowhow and the books and is going
to
> be a recon etc.
>
> vale
> Marcus Cornelius Felix
> Sacerdos Templi Mercurius
> Primus Sacerdotus Provincia America Boreoccidentalis
>
> House Priest Patrician Gens Cornelia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49013 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: RE :Italian pontifex
Q. Caecilius Metellus M. Hortensiae Maiori salutem.

I agree with you that one of the problems is language. However, I don't
think that it should prevent someone from petitioning for the position.
The only thing, in my opinion, that should stop someone from
petitioning for a position is one's own personal opinion. If a person
feels unable to fulfill the position, then that person should not apply.
But if a person is willing to perform the duties of a position and is
able to do so, there is, in my opinion, no reason not to petition for
it. The worst case scenario, to my mind, is that a person might be
underqualified in the sphere of knowledge, in which case I, for my own
part, would be more than willing to help that person gain the knowledge
s/he needs.

On the issue of having Latin as a universal language, I certainly agree
that it should be a goal, but it may not be a realistic one for the
relatively short term. To humour my interest, though, have you any
ideas on how we could go about bringing *all* our citizens up to the
standard of being able to effectively communicate in Latin?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49014 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: RE Italian: pontifex
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia M. Cornelio spd;
> one of the problems is language. If you don't speak
> English, you really won't make the request unless there is an
> outreach. I'm sure there are cultores in Italia who would love to be
> sacerdotes, & scholarly Latin reading ones to be pontifices.
> Certainly I'm sorry to see that our own PM still does not speak
> Latin.
> Speaking Latin, having one universal language is probably
> one of the most important efforts we should make for Nova Roma. It
> really would make us one community.
> > bene valete
> M. Hortensia Maior

M. Cornelio felix. M. Hortensia SPD
reading and speaking Latin is not the end all and do all to beening a
pontifex . I will give you it is a help :-)
I checked the NR website and i see that the pages for how to before a
priest/pontifex are not in Italian . so if someone knows both langs
they should write the pages so the Italian:, but i would like to get
the site in latin also as fast as we can.
vale
Marcus Cornelius Felix





> > >
> > Salve
> > My dear M. Hortensia Maior
> > RE :Italian pontifex
> >
> > well when i was a pontifex we never got a request from there .
> > there has to be a request from the person willing to be a pontifex.
> > and as far as I know there has never been a request from any
> Italian
> > to be pontifex
> > are they waiting to be told "you XYZ Civi you are a Italian, does
> not
> > work that way.
> > you need to tell them they have to ask,then they have to give poof
> > that the person asking has the knowhow and the books and is going
> to
> > be a recon etc.
> >
> > vale
> > Marcus Cornelius Felix
> > Sacerdos Templi Mercurius
> > Primus Sacerdotus Provincia America Boreoccidentalis
> >
> > House Priest Patrician Gens Cornelia
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49015 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: RE :Italian pontifex
Scaurus quiritibus SPD.

To my certain knowledge there has not been an application for a
pontificate from an Italian civis since I have been a pontifex. I've
looked back in the archives and haven't found an earlier application
of that sort either, but I can't guarantee that the archives are
complete. I also have the strong impression from the NR Italia list
that the majority of Italian cives in NR are not practitioners and
that many of those who are practitioners are primarily involved in
Italian-based reconstructionist groups.

Valete.

Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49016 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: Title's of City Officer's
> A. Tullia Scholastica Q. Servilio Prisco quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
>
> Salve,
>
> Do any of you know what the equivalent Roman titles would be for
> these modern, civic titles?
>
> Mayor & Vice Mayor (also known in KS as 'President of the Council')
> or City Council Member.
>
> ATS: I just answered this on another board...my English-Latin dictionary
> (Smith¹s) gives the best possibility for mayor as praefectus, construed with
> the genitive or dative. Council member would be decurio, according to the
> same source, though it also gives conciliarius, but with a different type of
> council in mind. Decurio is cited in Cicero. Strictly speaking, president
> of the council might well be caput concili or the like. Generally, however,
> Latin likes to express some of these concepts with verbs rather than nouns, so
> something like qui praeest or the like would be used.
>
> Vale,
>
> Quintus Servilius Priscus
>
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>
> .
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49017 From: Maior Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: RE :Italian pontifex
M. Hortensia Q. Caecilio M. Cornelio G. Iulioque spd;
Iuli Scaure, I'm talking in this respect about outreach,
I'd agree with you I'm pretty sure too no one from Italy ever
applied. But this is a good endeavor. Having the NR pages
translated. And maybe a monthly notice posted on the Provincial sites
it their own language, about becoming sacerdotes, qualified
individuals to apply to be pontifex, flamines etc. I'm happy Cornutus
& Diana are sacerdotes but they are both native English speakers &
British/American.
Nova Roma can be an alternative to MTR in Italy. I've
seen a few postings from Spaniards too who are interested in the
Religio but my Spanish is too poor.
Nova Roma is not only the state but the cultus deorum, if
the Hispani had more ties this way who knows.

Now as for Latin, Metelle, taking Avitus' Spoken Latin course at
Academia Thules is a sure fire way for us all to get there. Yes, it
may take some years. But it certainly is worth it. I have classmates
from Paris, Quebec, Spain, Russia, Argentina, Maryland. Now that's
fantastic.

Marce Corneli, you really need Latin to be a pontifex. Pontifices
were experts in religious law. Nova Roma is 10 years old, we can
strive for a higher standard for real reconstruction. You must be able
to read texts. Even scholarly essays in English have the Latin
untranslated.
This isn't a criticism, this is just my reading the European
lists & trying to hear what's going on & at least brainstorming for
some good answers.
ene valete in pacem deorum
M. Hortensia Maior

>
> To my certain knowledge there has not been an application for a
> pontificate from an Italian civis since I have been a pontifex. I've
> looked back in the archives and haven't found an earlier application
> of that sort either, but I can't guarantee that the archives are
> complete. I also have the strong impression from the NR Italia list
> that the majority of Italian cives in NR are not practitioners and
> that many of those who are practitioners are primarily involved in
> Italian-based reconstructionist groups.
>
> Valete.
>
> Scaurus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49018 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: appointment of scribas
Ex officio Aedilis Plebis

On the Creation of Scribae

I hereby appoint the following citizens as my scribes, with all the
obligations and privileges prescribed by the laws of Nova Roma.
- Franciscus Apulus Caesar
- Emilia Curia Finnica
- Quintus Caecilius Metellus
- Titus Iulius Sabinus
are appointed scribes. No oath shall be required of them. This edict
is effective immediately.

Ex hoc edicto, cives scribas meos una cum muneribus privilegiisque
secundum omnes praescriptas leges Novae Romae designo.
- Franciscus Apulus Caesar
- Emilia Curia Finnica
- Quintus Caecilius Metellus
- Titus Iulius Sabinus
scribae creatur. Nullum iusiurandum poscetur. Hoc edictum statim valet.

Given under my hand this AD.IV.ID.FEB. (10th of February 2007) in the
consulship of L. Armnius Faustus and Ti. Galerius Paulinus.

C. Curius Saturninus

Senator - Aedilis Plebis - Propraetor Provinciae Thules
Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49019 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
> A. Tullia Scholastica praetrix M. Calidio Graccho quiritibus S.P.D.
>
>
>
> M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS• QVIRITVBVS•S•P•D
>
> SALVETE OMNES,
>
> S.V.B.E.E.V.!
>
> It is much too long my friends since I have been amongst you.
>
> Since last I had the honour of speaking with you, I have travelled
> to AFRICA PROCONSVLARIS (Tunisia) and to the VRBS, our beloved ROMA
> ÆTERNA!
>
> ATS: You seem to have had quite an interesting itinerary. Perhaps you
> could post some pictures of your travels on the wikipedia.
>
> AhhÂ…. "TERRARVM DEA GENTIVMQVE, ROMA CVI PAR EST NIHIL ET NIHIL
> SECNDVM!"
>
> On browsing the ML, I notice with not a little concern, that there
> is much talk of PROVINCIÆ VIZ. HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA seceding from
> the RES PVBLICA!
>
>
> ATS: While I am not at liberty to discuss the deliberations in the Senate
> outside of those chambers, I may reassure you that the matter of Britannia¹s
> secession was simply in reference to something which happened several years
> ago and strictly in a historical context. Britannia remains among us at
> present, though in the past some citizens did leave NR. Consularis Marinus
> has explained the matter of Hispania as much as we can at present. Senator
> Astur and Tribunus Complutensis are dealing with these matters, as is the rest
> of the Senate.
>
> QVIRITES! Please excuse my ignorance, but what in the name of the
> gods, has befallen the RES PVBLICA?!
>
> I have no doubt that our PATRES ET CONSCRIPTI will deliberate
> judiciously on this grave matter and I pray that IVPPITER OPTIMVS
> MAXIMVS will aid and guide them in their decisions for the people of
> Rome.
>
> I am, perhaps, the least worthy of all to proffer a view on this
> very serious issue but if I may be permitted to say humbly as a
> CIVIS a few brief words.
>
> Honourable MARINVS has elucidated, I am relieved to hear, that the
> constitutional/ provincial position of HISPANIA is not under
> consideration. That, in my humble opinion, is a matter for the
> entire Roman people and state and not any particular grouping of
> CIVES acting uilaterally. That said, why then is the SC originally
> establishing that PROVINCIA being proposed for revocation? I
> beseech you to please forgive my obvious ignorance?!
>
> Of concern, surely, must be the factors leading to the circumstances
> where both PROVINCIÆ are mentioned in the same breath as
> secession?! I fear Diana (AVE DIANA!) may well have hit upon
> something in her comments below?
>
> I may be taking a very simplistic view, but as I see it there is
> only one fundamental question to be answered VIZ. do those involved
> wish to be CIVES of Rome reborn (NR) or not? Once this is
> established beyond doubt then allocation/ affiliation to the
> appropriate PROVINCIA should be a mere formality!
>
> I earnestly hope that I have not offended anyone, least of all our
> CIVES from HISPANIA or BRITANNIA.
>
> Surely, we are all citizens of Rome first and members of a PROVINCIA
> second?
>
> CVRATE VT VALEASTIS
>
> M•CALIDIVS•M•F•M•N•M•PR•PAL•GRACCHVS
> CIVIS NOVÆ ROMÆ
>
> VERITAS•LVX•MEA
>
> L•ARMINIVS•Ti• GALERIO COS.‡
> (MMDCCLX A•V•C)
>
> Vale, et valete.
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49020 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: RE :Italian pontifex
> A. Tullia Scholastica Q. Caecilio Metello M. Hortensiae Maiori quiritibus
> s.p.d.
>
>
>
> Q. Caecilius Metellus M. Hortensiae Maiori salutem.
>
> I agree with you that one of the problems is language. However, I don't
> think that it should prevent someone from petitioning for the position.
>
> ATS: Indeed, our new scriba at the AT (who is Italian) has informed me
> that Italians are REQUIRED to take Latin. That should put to rest any idea
> that they have (quite mysteriously) not been exposed to the language of their
> ancestors.
>
>
> The only thing, in my opinion, that should stop someone from
> petitioning for a position is one's own personal opinion. If a person
> feels unable to fulfill the position, then that person should not apply.
> But if a person is willing to perform the duties of a position and is
> able to do so, there is, in my opinion, no reason not to petition for
> it. The worst case scenario, to my mind, is that a person might be
> underqualified in the sphere of knowledge, in which case I, for my own
> part, would be more than willing to help that person gain the knowledge
> s/he needs.
>
> ATS: Perhaps it is simply the case that proportionally fewer Italians
> are, as someone suggested, cultores deorum.
>
> On the issue of having Latin as a universal language, I certainly agree
> that it should be a goal, but it may not be a realistic one for the
> relatively short term. To humour my interest, though, have you any
> ideas on how we could go about bringing *all* our citizens up to the
> standard of being able to effectively communicate in Latin?
>
> ATS: Require them to take Avitus¹ Assimil courses ;-) ...Cordus, Astur,
> and I can vouch for their efficacy in promoting fluency in Latin. They are,
> however, not easy, though easier after some prior exposure to Latin. Avitus
> himself has recommended that taking the Wheelock courses is a good foundation
> for the Assimil ones. We have made great progress in getting Latin speakers
> and Latin writers here, going from zero to thirty in these ten years, and from
> about six to thirty or so in just a couple of years. We also have several who
> can read Latin, but not write it at any length. Fairly often we get
> citizenship applications from those who are competent at Latin, so the number
> is somewhat fluid, as well as the fact that it reflects only official members
> of the Sodalitas Latinitatis, whose members MUST be on the mailing list in
> order to be counted. There are now about 360 members on the list, but perhaps
> a dozen or more who have joined via the Album Civium, and are NOT really
> members of the sodalitas since our charter requires membership in the mailing
> list.
>

Vale, et valete,

A. Tullia Scholastica


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49021 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Nova Roma Wiki, 2/10/2007, 12:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Nova Roma Wiki
 
Date:   Saturday February 10, 2007
Time:   12:00 pm - 1:00 pm
Repeats:   This event repeats every month.
Location:   http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Main_Page
Notes:   All citizens can contribute to the wiki. See http://www.novaroma.org/nr/NovaRoma:Project_of_the_Nundinum for the latest project.
 
Copyright © 2007  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49022 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: RE :Italian pontifex
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Iulio Scauro salutem dicit

There has not been an Italian applicant for anything, that I recall, since
have been in the Collegium Pontificum -- for several years now. I agree
with your assessment. Most are not practitioners, or so it would seem. We
cannot force the Italians, or any other nationality, what to believe.

Vale:

Modianus

On 2/10/07, Gregory Rose <gregory.rose@...> wrote:
>
> Scaurus quiritibus SPD.
>
> To my certain knowledge there has not been an application for a
> pontificate from an Italian civis since I have been a pontifex. I've
> looked back in the archives and haven't found an earlier application
> of that sort either, but I can't guarantee that the archives are
> complete. I also have the strong impression from the NR Italia list
> that the majority of Italian cives in NR are not practitioners and
> that many of those who are practitioners are primarily involved in
> Italian-based reconstructionist groups.
>
> Valete.
>
> Scaurus
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49023 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem IV Idus Februarius; haec dies nefastus est.

"After Fufetius had thus spoken and his proposal had been received
with general approbation (for the most important both of the Romans
and Albans were with the two leaders), Tullius, after a short
pause, spoke as follows:

[Tullius speaks] 'In other respects, Fufetius, you seem to me to
have reasoned well; for it must be some wonderful fortune that has
produced in both our cities in our generation a similarity of birth
never known before. But of one consideration you seem to be unaware —
a matter which will cause great reluctance in the youths if we ask
them to fight with one another. For the mother of our Horatii is
sister to the mother of the Alban Curiatii, and the young men have
been brought up in the arms of both the women and cherish and love one
another no less than their own brothers. Consider, therefore, whether,
as they are cousins and have been brought up together, it would not be
impious in us to put arms in their hands and invite them to mutual
slaughter. For the pollution of kindred blood, if they are compelled
to stain their hands with one another's blood, will deservedly fall
upon us who compel them.'

To this Fufetius answered: 'Neither have I failed, Tullius, to note
the kinship of the youths, nor did I purpose to compel them to fight
with their cousins unless they themselves were inclined to undertake
the combat. But as soon as this plan came into my mind I sent for the
Alban Curiatii and sacred them in private to learn whether they were
willing to engage in the combat; and it was only after they had
accepted the proposal with incredible and wonderful alacrity that I
decided to disclose my plan and bring it forward for consideration.
And I advise you to take the same course yourself — to send for the
triplets on your side and sound out their disposition. And if they,
too, agree of their own accord to risk their lives for their country,
accept the favour; but if hesitate, bring no compulsion to bear upon
them. I predict, however, the same result with them as with our own
youths — that is, if they are such men as we have been informed, like
the few most highly endowed by Nature, and are brave in arms; for the
reputation of their valour has reached us also.' " - Dionysius of
Halicarnassus 3.15


On this day, tradition says, Pharoah Thutmosis III of Egypt was
victorious in a battle on the plains of Meggido in Palestine in1468
B.C. Tuthmosis III fought with considerable nerve and cunning. On
this campaign, he marched to Gaza in ten days and from Yehem, planned
the battle to take take Megiddo which was held by a rebellious prince
named Kadesh. There were three possible approaches to Megiddo, two of
which were fairly open, straightforward routes while the third was
through a narrow pass that soldiers would only be able to march
through in single file.

Though he was advised against this dangerous pass by his commanders,
Tuthmosis not only took this dangerous route, but actually led the
troops through. Whether by luck, or gifted intuition this gamble paid
off, for when he emerged from the tight canyon, he saw that his
enemies had arranged their armies to defend the easier routes. In
fact, he emerged between the north and south wings of the enemy's
armies, and the next day decisively beat them in battle. It apparently
took a long siege (seven months) to take the city of Megiddo, but the
rewards were great. The spoils were considerable, and included 894
chariots, including two covered with gold, 200 suites of armor
including two of bronze, as well as over 2,000 horses and 25,000 other
animals. The human slaughter was so great (some casualty estimates
range between 30,000 - 50,000) that the site of the battle passed into
local lore; both Hebrew and Christian tradition have the final battle
between Good and Evil taking place at "har-Meggidon" or Armaggedon.

Tuthmosis III had marched from Thebes up the Syrian coast fighting
decisive battles, capturing three cities, and then returned back to
Thebes. Over the next 18 years, his armies would march against Syria
every summer and by the end of that period, he established Egyptian
dominance over Palestine. At Karnak he records the capture of 350
cities, and in the 42nd year of his rule, Kadesh itself was finally taken.


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Thutmosis III
(http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/tuthmosis3.htm)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49024 From: gentisanglorum Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
> The problem seems to be that the cultural association allowed
> non-citizens to join it as voting members. They grew to a majority,
> and have now voted themselves out.

That's not the truth. From 80 to 90% of that associacion's members are
also "citizens" of NR.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49025 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gentisanglorum"
<gentisanglorum@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The problem seems to be that the cultural association allowed
> > non-citizens to join it as voting members. They grew to a majority,
> > and have now voted themselves out.
>
> That's not the truth. From 80 to 90% of that associacion's members are
> also "citizens" of NR.
>
so if that is a fact why did they vote the way they did?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49026 From: M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: CONVENING OF THE SENATE FOR FEBRUARY 8
SALVE QVINTE,

It is, indeed, good to be back old friend, even better to hear from
you and, by the gods, I have had some good adventures!

Ahhh, where do I begin? Walking in the arena of the amphiteatre at
THYSDRVS (El Djem), the streets of THVGGA (Dougga), the remains of
Roman Carthage, seemingly endless olive groves, in AFRICA
PROCONSVLARIS, not to mention a stroll or two in ROMA through the
FORVM BOARIVM, CIRCVS MAXIMVS, and down the SACRA VIA through the
FORVM ROMANVM to mention but a few!

I hope that you will not mind too much if I, somewhat belatedly,
congratulate you on your admission to the Senate? I honestly cannot
think of a more deserving recognition of your always wise,
considered and temperate counsel or for that matter a more fitting
representative of the Roman people!

I shall stop and save your embarassment lol!

I note also, with interest that you have changed your NOMEN to
SVETONIVS a most suitable choice for you, if I may say so AMICE?

As you know, your famous namesake C. SVETONIVS TRANQVILLVS held a
number of posts at the imperial court, secretaryship of studies,
director of the imperial libraries and then was eventually placed in
charge of the emperor's correspondence and all that as well as his
authorship of DE VITA CÆSARVM (Lives of the Caesars) aka The Twelve
Caesars!
I thought you might be interested to know, his family are thought to
have come from HIPPO REGIVS in AFRICA PROCONSVLARIS (Annaba in
Algeria)!

Anyway, I digress my friend!

On the matter at hand, QVINTVS, I can easily accept your analysis
and observation that such things are almost inherently in the
nature of the beast, where human association and organisation is
involved. Afterall, we only have to look back to our own history in
ROMA ANTIQVA, to see that in extreme circumstances such differences
sometimes spilled over into civil war!

Taking such matters calmly is, indeed, sage advice!

BENE VALE

GRACCHVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
(Michael Kelly)" <mjk@...> wrote:
>
> Salve M•CALIDI•GRACCHI,
>
> It is good to see you back as always and hope you had a great
> adventure!
>
> Senator Marinus put the situation in a nutshell in his last post.
> I'm not at liberty to go into Senate discussions and proceedings
but I
> can say that over my many years I have seen that such situations
are
> so common place in all the cultural associations I to which I have
> belonged.
>
> Always there are those who come along with different ideas and
visions
> as to how things should be evolving and eventually pull out, take
a
> handful more or less of the members and try starting there own new
> association, parallel to the other. As they say, when you get five
or
> more people in a group there is always potential for conflict,
> differences and parting of the ways. You do nevertheless, have to
> carry on, learn from mistakes and make corrections but at the same
> time say full speed ahead and damn the torpedoes as some famous
> Admiral once said.
>
> Nova Roma is not unique in this situation and in any venture be it
> business or social organizations in life you are not going to
please
> everyone and often when you try pleasing everyone you please no
one.
> After coming to this conclusion over the years I therefore take
such
> situations calmly.
>
> Regards,
>
> QSP
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS
> <cybernaut911@> wrote:
> >
> > M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS• QVIRITVBVS•S•P•D
> >
> > SALVETE OMNES,
> >
> > S.V.B.E.E.V.!
> >
> > It is much too long my friends since I have been amongst you.
> >
> > Since last I had the honour of speaking with you, I have
travelled
> > to AFRICA PROCONSVLARIS (Tunisia) and to the VRBS, our beloved
ROMA
> > ÆTERNA!
> >
> >Snip for condensation
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49027 From: M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS• CN• EQVITIO• MARINO• S•P•D

SALVE MARINE,

I am grateful to you for your clarification of the issue surrounding
the SENATVS CONSVLTVM.

In light of the circumstances, honourable SENATOR, I see no
difficulty with such a proposed revocation, although, I would stress
that is purely a personal view on my part.

I do worry, however, that we can approve/ recognise cultural
organisations as representatives of the RES PVBLICA which have
members who are not CIVES of NOVA ROMA in the first place.

That said, I'm sure this is INTER ALIA a matter the Senate will duly
consider and debate so that lessons may be learned?

CVRA VT VALEAS

M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS

VERITAS•LVX•MEA

L•ARMINIVS•Ti• GALERIO COS.‡
(MMDCCLX A•V•C)

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Gracche,
>
> M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS <cybernaut911@...> writes:
>
> > why then is the SC originally
> > establishing that PROVINCIA being proposed for revocation?
>
> You misunderstand. The senatus consultum that is being considered
for
> revocation is *not* the one that created the province of
Hispania. It's a
> subsequent consultum which recognized a specific Spanish cultural
association
> as being the legal representative of Nova Roma in Spain. That
cultural
> association has now voted to separate itself from us, so we are
proposing to
> withdraw our recognition from it. That's all.
>
> > do those involved wish to be CIVES of Rome reborn (NR) or not?
>
> All of the Nova Roman citizens in Hispania remain Nova Roman
citizens. The
> problem seems to be that the cultural association allowed non-
citizens to
> join it as voting members. They grew to a majority, and have now
voted
> themselves out.
>
> Vale,
>
> CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49028 From: M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS Date: 2007-02-10
Subject: Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS• A• TVLLIƕ SCHOLASTICƕ S•P•D

SALVE SCHOLASTICA,

My thanks, honourable PRÆTRIX, for your reassurance and augmentation
of what MARINVS has said.

I am very relieved to learn that there is no extant constitutional
problem regarding the position of PROVINCIA BRITANNIA within the
commonwealth of the RES PVBLICA.

I also appreciate, that there are limitations as to what can be
said by the Senate at the moment.

My knowledge of the noble SENATOR ASTVR and the honourable Tribune
would lead me to conclude that matters are in safe hands.

On lighter matters, SCHOLASTICA, yes, I was very fortunate to travel
to some of the best preserved Roman remains in Africa if not the
Roman Empire upon visiting Tunisia and then subsequently I undertook
a separate second visit to our beloved ROMA. Unfortunately, I do
not have any in digital form that I could post regarding my trip to
Tunisia, only hard copy now I'm afraid, although, I should have some
still of ROMA in digital form which I should be delighted to forward.

Having visited POMPEII many years ago, I would honestly say that the
state of preservation of Roman towns such as THVGGA (Dougga) or
buildings such as the amphitreatre at THYSDRVS (El Djem) in AFRICA
PROCONSVLARIS is of a standard almost as high. If any CIVES can
manage it, I would strongly recommend a visit to this senatorial
province whose importance in both the commonwealth and empire
cannot be over stated. Along with ASIA, AFRICA was one of the two
wealthiest provinces, both senatorial provinces were centres of
Latin and Greek cultural and intellectual life outside Rome.

In my humble opinion, it is not possible to fully understand the
practical and economic functioning of the late republic and early
empire without an understanding of it.

The birthplace of coloured mosaics in the Roman Empire, the
collection of mosaics held in the Bardo Museum in Tunis are
arguably the finest and most extensive in the Roman world.

CVRA VT VALEAS

M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS

VERITAS•LVX•MEA

L•ARMINIVS•Ti• GALERIO COS.‡
(MMDCCLX A•V•C)


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
<fororom@...> wrote:
>
> > A. Tullia Scholastica praetrix M. Calidio Graccho quiritibus
S.P.D.
> >
> >
> >
> > M•CALIDIVS•GRACCHVS• QVIRITVBVS•S•P•D
> >
> > SALVETE OMNES,
> >
> > S.V.B.E.E.V.!
> >
> > It is much too long my friends since I have been amongst you.
> >
> > Since last I had the honour of speaking with you, I have
travelled
> > to AFRICA PROCONSVLARIS (Tunisia) and to the VRBS, our beloved
ROMA
> > ÆTERNA!
> >
> > ATS: You seem to have had quite an interesting itinerary.
Perhaps you
> > could post some pictures of your travels on the wikipedia.
> >
> > AhhÂ…. "TERRARVM DEA GENTIVMQVE, ROMA CVI PAR EST NIHIL ET NIHIL
> > SECNDVM!"
> >
> > On browsing the ML, I notice with not a little concern, that
there
> > is much talk of PROVINCIÆ VIZ. HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA seceding
from
> > the RES PVBLICA!
> >
> >
> > ATS: While I am not at liberty to discuss the deliberations
in the Senate
> > outside of those chambers, I may reassure you that the matter of
Britannia¹s
> > secession was simply in reference to something which happened
several years
> > ago and strictly in a historical context. Britannia remains
among us at
> > present, though in the past some citizens did leave NR.
Consularis Marinus
> > has explained the matter of Hispania as much as we can at
present. Senator
> > Astur and Tribunus Complutensis are dealing with these matters,
as is the rest
> > of the Senate.
> >
> > QVIRITES! Please excuse my ignorance, but what in the name of
the
> > gods, has befallen the RES PVBLICA?!
> >
> > I have no doubt that our PATRES ET CONSCRIPTI will deliberate
> > judiciously on this grave matter and I pray that IVPPITER OPTIMVS
> > MAXIMVS will aid and guide them in their decisions for the
people of
> > Rome.
> >
> > I am, perhaps, the least worthy of all to proffer a view on this
> > very serious issue but if I may be permitted to say humbly as a
> > CIVIS a few brief words.
> >
> > Honourable MARINVS has elucidated, I am relieved to hear, that
the
> > constitutional/ provincial position of HISPANIA is not under
> > consideration. That, in my humble opinion, is a matter for the
> > entire Roman people and state and not any particular grouping of
> > CIVES acting uilaterally. That said, why then is the SC
originally
> > establishing that PROVINCIA being proposed for revocation? I
> > beseech you to please forgive my obvious ignorance?!
> >
> > Of concern, surely, must be the factors leading to the
circumstances
> > where both PROVINCIÆ are mentioned in the same breath as
> > secession?! I fear Diana (AVE DIANA!) may well have hit upon
> > something in her comments below?
> >
> > I may be taking a very simplistic view, but as I see it there is
> > only one fundamental question to be answered VIZ. do those
involved
> > wish to be CIVES of Rome reborn (NR) or not? Once this is
> > established beyond doubt then allocation/ affiliation to the
> > appropriate PROVINCIA should be a mere formality!
> >
> > I earnestly hope that I have not offended anyone, least of all
our
> > CIVES from HISPANIA or BRITANNIA.
> >
> > Surely, we are all citizens of Rome first and members of a
PROVINCIA
> > second?
> >
> > CVRATE VT VALEASTIS
> >
> > M•CALIDIVS•M•F•M•N•M•PR•PAL•GRACCHVS
> > CIVIS NOVÆ ROMÆ
> >
> > VERITAS•LVX•MEA
> >
> > L•ARMINIVS•Ti• GALERIO COS.‡
> > (MMDCCLX A•V•C)
> >
> > Vale, et valete.
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49029 From: M. CVRIATIVS COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-02-11
Subject: Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
Salve "gentisanglorum"

How do you know the composition of this association?

And most important: who are you?

Why do you not sign your messages?

Vale

M. Cur. Complutensis
Tribunus Plebis




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gentisanglorum" <gentisanglorum@...>
wrote:
>
>
>
> > The problem seems to be that the cultural association allowed
> > non-citizens to join it as voting members. They grew to a majority,
> > and have now voted themselves out.
>
> That's not the truth. From 80 to 90% of that associacion's members are
> also "citizens" of NR.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49030 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-11
Subject: a.d. III Id. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem III Idus Februarius; haec dies nefastus est.

"Our earliest government was monarchy, under which constitution we
lived till the seventh generation. And during all these reigns the
people never suffered any loss of rights at the hands of their kings,
and least of all from those who reigned last, to say nothing of the
many important advantages they enjoyed from their rule. For, besides
the other methods the kings used of courting and flattering the people
in order to win them to themselves and make them enemies to you —
which is the practice of all rulers who aim at extending their power
to tyranny — when they had made themselves masters of Suessa, a very
prosperous city, after a long war, and had it in their power to grant
no part of the spoils to anyone, but to appropriate the whole to
themselves and surpass all other kings in riches, they did not think
fit to do so, but brought out all the booty and placed it at the
disposal of the army, so that, besides the slaves, cattle and the
other spoils, which were many and of great value, every one of us
received five minae of silver for his share. But we disregarded all
this when they used their power more in the manner of tyrants to
injure, not us, to be sure, but you; and resenting their behaviour, we
gave up our affection for our kings and joined you, and rising with
you against them, both those of us who were in the city and those in
camp, we drove them out, and bringing to you their power, entrusted it
to you. And though it was often possible for us to go over to the side
of the expelled kings, yet we scorned to accept the lavish gifts they
offered us to induce us to violate our pledge to you, but patiently
endured many great and continuous wars and dangers on your account.
And up to this time, which is the seventeenth year, we have been worn
out with fighting against all mankind for our common liberty. For
while the government was still unsettled — as often happens in the
case of sudden revolutions — we ventured to contend with the two most
renowned cities of the Tyrrhenians, Tarquinii and Veii, when they
sought with a large army to restore the kings; and fighting, a few
against many, and displaying the greatest enthusiasm, we not only
overcame and drove back these foes, but preserved the power for the
surviving consul. Not long afterwards, when Porsena, king of the
Tyrrhenians, was also endeavouring to restore the exiles both with the
united forces of all Tyrrhenia commanded by himself and with those
which the others had long before raised, we, though unprovided with an
adequate army, and for that reason forced to undergo a siege and
reduced to the last extremity and to a dearth of everything, yet by
enduring all these hardships forced him to depart after first becoming
our friend. And last of all, when the kings for the third time sought
to effect their restoration with the aid of the Latin nation and
brought against us thirty cities, we, seeing you entreating,
lamenting, calling upon every one of us, and reminding us of our
friendship, our common rearing, and the campaigns we had shared
together, could not bear to abandon you. But looking upon it as a most
honourable and glorious thing to give your battles, we rushed into the
midst of perils and hazarded on that occasion surely the greatest
danger of all, in which, after we had received many wounds and lost
many of our relations, companions and comrades in arms, we overcame
the enemy, killed their generals, and destroyed the whole royal
family." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus, "Roman Histories" VI.74

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Dionysius of Halicarnassus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49031 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-02-11
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
A. Apollonius L. Junio sal.

Do I owe you a private e-mail? I feel that we were in the middle of a conversation some time ago, but I can't remember how it was left.

You asked for some sources on this subject. I see you've found the article on the website, which incidentally is largely drawn from Willems, 'Le Senat De La Republique Romaine", with supplementary material from Lintott's very useful little book, 'The Constitution Of The Roman Republic'. As Cn. Equitius has mentioned, this topic comes up from time to time, and the sources have had a rather fuller airing on previous occasions. You may find it helpful to look at the discussions in the archives from message 6113 to about 6243, and more recently from about 35356 to 35382 (which includes a rather fun little altercatio between myself and Q. Maximus). As to the broader point that secret government is a concept alien to the Roman republic, I recommend pages 80 to 94 of Williamson's 'The Laws Of The Roman People', an excellent passage of a book whose over-all quality and reliability is decidedly variable.

The historical arguments have now been aired so much that it is, I think, universally accepted (except perhaps by Q. Maximus) that the current arrangement is a res nova and contra morem. Nonetheless nothing has been done about it. I suspect part of the reason for this is that most of the people in a position to do something about it are already members of the senate and therefore stand to gain nothing personally from any reform. (This is not to suggest, of course, that all our public men and women are motivated solely by personal advantage, but it is I think undeniable that the hope of personal advantage can be a great incentive to act on one's principles.) Another reason is, perhaps, that it is not entirely clear whose job it is to make the necessary changes.

This point is worth discussing more fully. If the current veil of secrecy were to be lifted, by whom should or could it be lifted? Many people seem to assume that it could only be done by a decision of the senate itself. After all, it was the senate (we presume) which created the rule in the first place. But was it? I think not. There is no senatus consultum on record establishing that the proceedings of the senate must take place in secret, or that members of the senate are constrained from revealing the contents of its proceedings. Nor is there any lex or other item of written law to that effect. And, as we know, where written law is silent, the law of the ancient republic applies. In the ancient republic, the decision whether to allow public access to the proceedings of the senate was the decision of the presiding magistrate. Therefore it remains the case today that it is up to the presiding magistrate, every time he convenes the senate, to decide whether to 'open the doors' or not. It seems that every presiding magistrate in the history of Nova Roma has decided to keep the doors closed. I presume that most of them did this simply because they did not realize that they had the power to open them.

It may be objected that there are senatus consulta in the tabularium which discuss the issue, and that these overrule, constrain, or destroy the power of the presiding magistrate to open the doors. The first part is true, but the second is not. Q. Maximus or M. Minucius when consul (the tabularium does not record which) asked the senate to advise him whether he should conduct meetings of the senate in the public view. The senate advised him not to do so. Now, it is well known that in ancient times senatus consulta were not, except in specified circumstances, legally binding at all. That is not the case in Nova Roma, because our unhistorical lex constitutiva gives senatus consulta legal force. However, the lex constitutiva does not specify the nature of this binding force, so we must look again to antiquity for guidance. The position in antiquity is quite clear. A senatus consultum was advice directed at a particular magistrate, namely the presiding magistrate. Where it was intended to be obeyed by someone other than that particular magistrate, the senatus consultum always stated *explicitly* that it was addressed to that other person. In particular, a senatus consultum which was meant to be followed not only by the present magistrate but by his successors in office, this was explicitly stated. It follows that, where there is no such explicit statement, the senatus consultum is only addressed to the presiding magistrate who submits the proposal, and it is therefore legally binding only upon that particular magistrate, not upon anyone to whom it is not explicitly addressed. So Q. Maximus or M. Minucius was, during his consulate, legally forbidden from making the senate's proceedings public. Nobody else was so forbidden, and certainly nobody is so forbidden now. It is therefore my opinion that the presiding magistrate has the power to make public the contents of any meeting of the senate over which he presides, and will not be acting unlawfully if he does so.

With respect to the prohibition on revealing or discussing in public things said or done in the senate, this is not even mentioned in any senatus consultum or anywhere else in the written law as far as I can discover. However, this rule may indeed have some historical basis. I have read in Livy's account of the war with Hannibal, though I cannot now lay my hands on the specific passage, that a member of the senate was criticised for revealing the details of a debate in the senate contrary to the customary rule. This, however, obviously makes no sense at all if the meeting itself was open to a public audience, so it must be presumed that this rule only applied to meetings which were held in secret. It may have been even more narrowly applicable: we would need to find the passage in question and examine its wording, and also ask whether there is any corroboration. Perhaps we shall be assisted by C. Julius, whose memory for primary sources is far better than mine. In any case, it may be that this rule is based on a genuine ancient custom. If this is so, then it will of course be applicable in Nova Roma today, on the basis that ancient custom applies where modern written law is silent. For the same reason, if this is not an ancient custom then it has no force and no senator who breaks the rule will be acting unlawfully or contra morem.

Finally we must mention the tribuni plebis. They are empowered by the lex constitutiva to "keep the citizens informed as to the subjects and results [of meetings of the senate], in
such manner and subject to such restrictions as may be defined by law". What manner and what restrictions are defined by law? First, the written law. Again we note that there is no senatus consultum or other written legal instrument which lays down any general rule forbidding the tribuni to publish the contents of debates. Q. Maximo M. Minucio cos. the senate resolved that "the votes of individual Senators, along with any rationales
they offer with their votes (i.e., in the same e-mail as the vote itself), [shall] be
made public, either by forwarding them to the main Nova roma e-mail list or by
posting them to the main Nova Roma web site". This senatus consultum is not explicitly addressed to anyone, and was therefore binding only on the presiding magistrate of that meeting, as discussed above. Moreover, it should be noted that it only says that the votes of senatores, and their comments thereon, *shall* be made public: significantly, it does not *forbid* the publication of information additional to this. The proper interpretation of this senatus consultum is therefore that it specifies the minimum amount of information to be published but fixes no maximum. This was the same conclusion which was reached in the first discussion of this issue which I referred to above: it is within the powers of the tribuni plebis, subject to any custom which may exist restricting the discussion of the contents of secret meetings, to publish not only the minimal amount of information they normally publish, but as much information as they please concerning the proceedings of the senate, up to and including a full transcript.

That, then, covers the question whether there is any rule of modern Roman law preventing greater public access to meetings of the senate. In view of my conclusion that there is no rule of law preventing the presiding magistrate of a meeting making that meeting public, it remains to ask whether there is any reason of practical policy why this should not be done.

The reason this question continues to come up time and again is that nobody ever produces any satisfactory answer. I find Cn. Equitius says that there are things which the Board of Directors of Nova Roma Inc. must discuss in confidence. As you yourself pointed out, this does not lead to the necessary logical conclusion that all proceedings of the senate must remain confidential. His response to this was a flat and unexplained denial. I have great respect and indeed affection for Cn. Equitius, and I know that he is a man who believes in the value of logical argument, so I am sure he must know already that this kind of "because I say so" argument is not going to convince any rational person. We are left to guess at the real answer. I suspect the answer may be a purely logistical one. As I understand it, "meetings" of the senate are largely fictional occurrences. The senate is, in effect, in permanent session, and its members are free to say whatever they please at whatever time they wish. All that changes when a "meeting" is convened is that the presiding magistrate specifies certain particular proposals, which may or may not have been under informal discussion already, as requiring a decision, and at a certain time the senatores are required to vote on those proposals. But the underlying, unstructured conversation continues throughout and between every meeting. This may be a false impression - that, of course, is the problem when members of the public are prevented from observing or even being told about what goes on there! But let us assume that it is a true impression. This presents obvious practical difficulties to anyone wishing to make a particular meeting of the senate public. First, if members of the public were to be permitted to subscribe to the e-mail list on which the meeting took place, they would be able to read not only the contents of that meeting but also everything else which has ever been said on that list, unless the archives are to be destroyed after every meeting. Secondly, since any senator may write anything at any time during a meeting, there is nothing to prevent a senator suddenly revealing, in the public view, some kind of confidential information pertaining to the senate's function as Board of Directors. Thirdly, it would be a great administrative burden for the presiding magistrate to forcibly unsubscribe every member of the public at the end of each meeting.

But of course practical problems are always amenable to practical solutions. In fact it would be very beneficial to force these particular problems to be solved, since they are not only obstacles to public observation of the senate but are in themselves unhistorical features of the senate which ought to be eliminated. I need not speculate on what the solutions might be: one can easily imagine them. It is sufficient for now to observe that solutions could certainly be found.

Moreover, even if there is some logically necessary, and not merely contingent, reason why the senate's role as Board of Directors prevents *any* of its proceedings being made public, there is a simply and obvious solution to this problem also: stop the senate being the Board of Directors. People in Nova Roma have a tendency to be incredibly, frustratingly blinkered about anything pertaining to Nova Roma Inc. They forget that the purpose of Nova Roma Inc. is to enable Nova Roma more effectively to pursue and achieve its goals. The fundamental purpose of Nova Roma is to be a modern Roman republic. Where Nova Roma Inc. turns out to be structured in such a way that it prevents or hinders Nova Roma from being a modern Roman republic, the only logical solution is to change whatever it is about Nova Roma Inc. which is getting in the way of Nova Roma, not (as most people seem to assume) to change whatever it is about Nova Roma which is getting in the way of Nova Roma Inc. If the senate is unable to behave like a true Roman senate because it is also the Board of Directors, then the solution is to stop it being the Board of Directors so that it can be a true Roman senate, not to stop it being a true Roman senate so that it can be the Board of Directors. Otherwise the tail is wagging the dog.




___________________________________________________________
What kind of emailer are you? Find out today - get a free analysis of your email personality. Take the quiz at the Yahoo! Mail Championship.
http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://mail.yahoo.net/uk
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49032 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-02-11
Subject: REVISED AGENDA IN THE OPEN SESSION OF THE SENATE
Salvete omnes

the Senate has revised his agenda.

The message of Consul Galerius Paulinus was:

Salvete Patres Conscripti

Here is a revised agenda reflecting the requests of my colleague and the members of this house. I have removed the request for funds for a website for Hispania and I have added the Praetorship of Mexico and Italia for your consideration. It was not considered necessary to prorogue P. Memmius Albucius as Praetor as he was just appointed.

As to the request of L. Iunius Bassus to serve as Praetor of California I have informed him as well as my colleague that given his short time among us, ( six months and a few days) I would not be tendering his name nor would I allow it to be tendered any time soon.

California needs a Praetor and will have one in due time. Appointing a citizen who barely meets the legal requirement is just not good enough. Spending a few weeks or months finding the right person is not too much to ask.

Agenda

Item I

The Senate revokes the Senatus Consultum of 15 October 2757 in which the Senate recognized the Spanish Association "Provincia Hispania de Nova Roma" as part of Nova Roma..

Item II

Marcus Curiatius Complutensis is appointed Propraetor of Hispania


Item III

A letter shall be drafted to the citizens of Hispania letting them know that they are valued in Nova Romans and that we are willing to listen o their concerns.

The letter should also ask that if the NR Hispania website/domain name was paid for by Nova Roman funds that it be turned over to our Propraetor for use by the Nova Roman province of Hispania.

Item IV

A letter to the new association should respectfully ask that the new association refrain from using the name or logos of Nova Roma, Inc.

Item V

A. Moravia Aurelia is appointed as Propraetor of America Austroccidentalis.

Item VI

Marcus Iulius Severus is appointed as Propraetor of Mexico

Item VII

F. Apulus Caesar is appointed as Proconsul of Italia

Item VIII

M. Iulius Severus is appointed interpreter of Spanish

Item IX

Publius Constantinus Placidus is appointed interpreter of Italian.

Item X

A. Tullia Scholastica is appointed interpreter of Latin

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These items are being voted at the moment.

Valete bene

M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
SCRIBA CENSORIS GFBM
NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49033 From: M. CVRIATIVS COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-02-11
Subject: Re: REVISED AGENDA IN THE OPEN SESSION OF THE SENATE
Salvete omnes

Consul Galerius Paulinus dixit:......... As to the request of L.
Iunius Bassus to serve as Praetor of California I have informed him
as well as my colleague that given his short time among us, ( six
months and a few days) I would not be tendering his name nor would I
allow it to be tendered any time soon............


I am not in the agreement with the decision of the consul to prevent
that a citizen is elected or not like magistrate.

According our laws L.Iunius Bassus is able to be appointed magistrate
and also according our laws is the presiding Consul who published the
Agenda, (leaving outside an item or including another one).

I hope that this will be corrected in a future session of the Senate.

Valete bene

M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
SCRIBA CENSORIS GFBM
NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49034 From: Gaius Marius Merullus Date: 2007-02-11
Subject: Suffragium C Marii Merulli
Salvete

Item I

The Senate revokes the Senatus Consultum of 15 October 2757 in which the Senate recognized the Spanish Association "Provincia Hispania de Nova Roma" as part of Nova Roma..

Vti rogas I vote to revoke that senatus consultum


Item II

Marcus Curiatius Complutensis is appointed Propraetor of Hispania

Vti rogas

Item III

Vti rogas


Item IV

Vti rogas


Item V

A. Moravia Aurelia is appointed as Propraetor of America Austroccidentalis.

Vti rogas

Item VI

Marcus Iulius Severus is appointed as Propraetor of Mexico

Vti rogas

Item VII

F. Apulus Caesar is appointed as Proconsul of Italia

Vti rogas I vote to appoint F Apulus Caesar but point out that, according to the senatus consultum approved in the last session, his title should be Praefectus Italiae.

Item VIII

M. Iulius Severus is appointed interpreter of Spanish

Vti rogas

Item IX

Publius Constantinus Placidus is appointed interpreter of Italian.

Vti rogas

Item X

A. Tullia Scholastica is appointed interpreter of Latin

Vti rogas



Vivat Roma

Vivat Nova Roma



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49035 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2007-02-11
Subject: Re: Suffragium Q. Fabi Maximi
Q. Fabius Maximus Curiae salutem dicit

Item I

The Senate revokes the Senatus Consultum of 15 October 2757
in which the Senate recognized the Spanish Association
"Provincia Hispania de Nova Roma" as part of Nova Roma..

QFM: VTIROGAS


Item II

Marcus Curiatius Complutensis is appointed Propraetor of Hispania

QFM: ANTIQVO
Our good Tribune was involved in this as well. Why should we ignore this
fact? We need some one totally aloof from the scandal.


Item III

A letter shall be drafted to the citizens of Hispania letting
them know that they are valued in Nova Romans and that we are
willing to listen o their concerns.

The letter should also ask that if the NR Hispania website/domain
name was paid for by Nova Roman funds that it be turned over to our
Propraetor for use by the Nova Roman province of Hispania.

QFM: ANTIQVO
I. The Roman Senate never listened to any concerns. Read
some history...And remember, they joined us, we didn’t join them.
II. If we change our system every time someone bitches about
us, we are not going to accomplish much. I suspect 50% of these dis
-franchised citizens will be back in the NR fold before year’s end.


Item IV

A letter to the new association should respectfully ask that
the new association refrain from using the name or logos of Nova
Roma, Inc.
QFM: VTIROGAS
By Internet Law they can’t. We withdrew our permission to use it.

Item V

A. Moravia Aurelia is appointed as Propraetor of America
Austroccidentalis.
QFM: VTIROGAS


Item VI

Marcus Iulius Severus is appointed as Propraetor of Mexico
QFM: ABSTAINO
How many citizens are in Mexico right now? Enough to justify a Propraetor?

Item VII


F. Apulus Caesar is appointed as Proconsul of Italia
QFM: ANTIQVO



Item VIII: M. Iulius Severus is appointed interpreter of Spanish
QFM: VTIROGAS


Item IX: Publius Constantinus Placidus is appointed interpreter of Italian.

QFM: VTIROGAS


Item X: A. Tullia Scholastica is appointed interpreter of Latin

QFM: VTIROGAS


VALETE


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49036 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2007-02-11
Subject: Re: REVISED AGENDA IN THE OPEN SESSION OF THE SENATE
Q. Caecilius Metellus M. Curiatio Complutensi salutem dicit.

If I may make an observation, Complutensis, t bears mentioning that,
while you may disagree with the decision of Tiberius Galerius not to
present L. Iunius to the Senate for the position of Californiae
Provinciae Gubernator, there is nothing that requires his doing so. If
I recall correctly, he in fact has the right to place things on the
agenda at his discretion (and similarly omit things).
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49037 From: Tita Artoria Marcella Date: 2007-02-11
Subject: Factio Russata mailing list
Salvete omnes,

A new mailing list for Factio Russata has been created:

http://sports.groups.yahoo.com/group/factio_russata/?yguid=286580572

All members of the Reds are invited to join.

Valete bene,
T. Artoria Marcella


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49038 From: M·C·C· Date: 2007-02-12
Subject: Re: REVISED AGENDA IN THE OPEN SESSION OF THE SENATE
Salve Caecili Metelle

sometimes I doubt if people read the complete messages..... I said in my message:

".........I am not in the agreement with the decision of the consul to prevent that a citizen is elected or not like magistrate.

According our laws L.Iunius Bassus is able to be appointed magistrate and also according our laws is the presiding Consul who published the Agenda, (leaving outside an item or including another one)." (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/49033"

Vale

M�CVRIATIVS�COMPLVTENSIS
TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
SCRIBA CENSORIS GFBM
NOVA ROMA
-----------------------------------------
ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima


----- Mensaje original -----
De: Q. Caecilius Metellus
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: lunes, 12 de febrero de 2007 3:46
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: REVISED AGENDA IN THE OPEN SESSION OF THE SENATE


Q. Caecilius Metellus M. Curiatio Complutensi salutem dicit.

If I may make an observation, Complutensis, t bears mentioning that,
while you may disagree with the decision of Tiberius Galerius not to
present L. Iunius to the Senate for the position of Californiae
Provinciae Gubernator, there is nothing that requires his doing so. If
I recall correctly, he in fact has the right to place things on the
agenda at his discretion (and similarly omit things).





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49039 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-12
Subject: prid. Id. Feb.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est pridie Idus Februarius; haec dies nefastus est.

"The youths upon hearing these words withdrew to one side, and after a
short conference together returned to give their answer; and the
eldest17 on behalf of them all spoke as follows: 'If we were free and
sole masters of our own decisions, Tullius, and you had given us the
opportunity to deliberate concerning the combat with our cousins, we
should without further delay have given your our thoughts upon it. But
since our father is still living, without whose advice we do not think
it proper to say or do the least thing, we ask you to wait a short
time for our answer till we have talked with him.' Tullius having
commended their filial devotion and told them to do as they proposed,
they went home to their father. And acquainting him with the proposals
of Fufetius and with what Tullius had said to them and, last of all,
with their own answer, they desired his advice. And he answered and
said: 'But indeed this is dutiful conduct on your part, my sons, when
you live for your father and do nothing without my advice. But it is
time for you to show that you yourselves now have discretion in such
matters at least. Assume, therefore, that my life is now over, and let
me know what you yourselves would have chosen to do if you had
deliberated without your father upon your own affairs.' And the
eldest answered him thus: 'Father, we would have accepted this combat
for the supremacy and would have been ready to suffer whatever should
be the will of Heaven; for we had rather be dead than to live unworthy
both of you and of our ancestors. As for the bond of kinship with our
cousins, we shall not be the first to break it, but since it has
already been broken by fate, we shall acquiesce therein. For if the
Curiatii esteem kinship less than honour, the Horatii also will not
value the ties of blood more highly than valour.' Their father, upon
learning their disposition, rejoiced exceedingly, and lifting his
hands to Heaven, said he rendered thanks to the gods for having given
him noble sons. Then, throwing his arms about each in turn and giving
the tenderest of embraces and kisses, he said: 'You have my opinion
also, my brave sons. Go, then, to Tullius and give him the answer that
is both dutiful and honourable.' The youths went away pleased with
the exhortation of their father, and going to the king, they accepted
the combat; and he, after assembling the senate and sounding the
praises of the youths, sent ambassadors to the Alban to inform him
that the Romans accepted his proposal and would offer the Horatii to
fight for the sovereignty." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus 3.17


"Muse, sing of Artemis, sister of the Far-shooter, the virgin who
delights in arrows, who was fostered with Apollo. She waters her
horses from Meles deep in reeds, and swiftly drives her all-golden
chariot through Smyrna to vine-clad Claros where Apollo, god of the
silver bow, sits waiting for the far-shooting goddess who delights in
arrows." - Homer, Hymn to Artemis 9 II.1-6

"I sing of Artemis, whose shafts are of gold, who cheers on the
hounds, the pure maiden, shooter of stags, who delights in archery,
own sister to Apollo with the golden sword. Over the shadowy hills and
windy peaks she draws her golden bow, rejoicing in the chase, and
sends out grievous shafts. The tops of the high mountains tremble and
the tangled wood echoes awesomely with the outcry of beasts:
earthquakes and the sea also where fishes shoal. But the goddess with
a bold heart turns every way destroying the race of wild beasts: and
when she is satisfied and has cheered her heart, this huntress who
delights in arrows slackens her supple bow and goes to the great house
of her dear brother Phoebus Apollo, to the rich land of Delphi, there
to order the lovely dance of the Muses and Graces. There she hangs up
her curved bow and her arrows, and heads and leads the dances,
gracefully arrayed, while all they utter their heavenly voice, singing
how neat-ankled Leto bare children supreme among the immortals both in
thought and in deed." - Homer, Hymn to Artemis 27 II.1-20

In ancient Greece, this day was held in honor of the goddess Artemis.
Artemis (as well as her twin brother, Apollo) was the daughter of the
goddess Leto and Zeus. Now, Hera wasn't too happy about her husband
Zeus messing around on her like that, and sent all sorts of horrible
things after Leto, like a gadfly and a serpent named Python. She also
made a decree that Leto could not be allowed to rest anywhere on solid
ground. Eventually, Leto made it to the island of Delos (which wasn't
called Delos) and could rest there (as it escaped Hera's decree that
Leto couldn't rest on solid ground, it was a floating island). But
even there, Hera forbid Ilythia, the goddess of childbirth, to come to
her aid. Eventually, the gods bribed Hera with a beautiful necklace,
and Eilithia went to Leto. Some stories say that Artemis, the first
born, was a relatively easy birth, but her brother definitely wasn't.
And so immediatly after she was born, Artemis became her mother's
midwife and after many painful hours brought her brother into the
world. So, since then, Artemis has been considered a protectress of
childbirth.

Even though Artemis could love most intensely, she could also be very
cold and unforgiving. This is a very god-like trait that every god and
goddess (barring Hestia) has, at some point, displayed. One well-known
story of her chilly personality has to do with the hunter Actaeon.
Artemis had just had a long day of hunting, and was sweaty and gross,
and ready for a nice bath. This was deep in the woods in a sacred
pool, and it wasn't very likely that anyone would come upon her. But
people of Actaeon's family had a history of bad luck, and he did just
that. Now, every man knows that if you see a naked goddess (unless it
is Aphrodite, or she invites you to see her naked) you run away, and
PRAY that she doesn't notice. But either Actaeon wasn't very bright or
he was so enraptured by her beauty that he didn't move. What he did
was stare. Bad idea. Artemis heard him, turned around, and in fury
threw water at him. As the the droplets hit him, he was transformed
into a stag. At that, Artemis whistled for his hounds, and they ripped
their unfortunate master apart.

Then there's Orion. Artemis and Orion began to develope a
relationship, but Orion was already involved with Eos. Apollo got
worried about the chastity of his sister, and started worrying that
Artemis would be as taken in as Eos. That doesn't really appear to be
the case, but Apollo was jealous, so he went and arranged with Gaia to
send an enormous scorpion after him. Now, some say that this animal
was just too much for Orion and killed him (and that Artemis was
furious at Apollo for a while, but relented when Apollo helped her
hang Orion in the sky). Another version says that Orion ran away from
the scorpion - or rather, swam away to Eos' island, hoping that the
goddess of Dawn would protect him. But then Apollo told his sister
that the figure bobbing in the sea was a villain who had just seduced
one of her priestesses. Then he challenged her to hit the bobbing
object. She did, and killed her friend unknowingly. She tried to get
Asclepius to revive him, but Zeus destroyed him before he got the
chance. And so ended Artemis' only romance before it could begin.

Among the epithets of Artemis are: Calliste ("most beautiful"),
Caryatis, Chryasor ("golden"), Eucleia ("well-named"), Phosphoros
("shimmering"), Peitho ("persuasive") and Partheneia ("virginal").

In Rome, Artemis was known as Diana.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES


Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Homer, Artemis
(http://www.paleothea.com/SortaSingles/Artemis.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49040 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-02-12
Subject: Re: De Aucupibus Senatui
Cato A Apollonio L. Iunio SPD

Salvete.

Actually, Corde, there is a fairly simple immediate solution:

1. make all sitting senators "moderators" of the Senate List

2. close the archives to all but moderators

This way, citizens can read the current discussions but cannot access
the archives of the Senate.

A seperate List could be created for meetings of the Board of
Directors of the corporation in any case.


Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49041 From: gentisanglorum Date: 2007-02-12
Subject: Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
Compultensis:

I've seen you've banned me from "nrhispania" mail list...

It doesn't matter. In the message #22928 (January 25th 2007) of that
list, you posted the names of the 34 members of the Spanish
association. A quick search within the album civium database reveals
that 29 of them are also citizens of Nova Roma, and only 5 are not.

So, as you can see, the 85,29% of the members of the Spanish
association are citizens of Nova Roma too. There wasn't any "majority
of non-citizens taking control of the association". That was a lie.

You asked me for a name. You can call me A Friend of Truth.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49042 From: M·C·C· Date: 2007-02-12
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
Oh! An anonymous "friend of thuth"!

"Rompipalle" will be a better name.

The done affirmations anonymously do not deserve any respect. A minimum norm of education demands to identify itself or to sign the messages.

gentisanglorum dixit: "You asked me for a name. You can call me A Friend of Truth."

..............sound of drums ...........................................

Really do you think that you are a superhero?

Vale

M�CVRIATIVS�COMPLVTENSIS
TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
SCRIBA CENSORIS GFBM
NOVA ROMA
-----------------------------------------
ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima



----- Mensaje original -----
De: gentisanglorum
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: lunes, 12 de febrero de 2007 14:24
Asunto: [Nova-Roma] Re: PROVINCI� HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA


Compultensis:

I've seen you've banned me from "nrhispania" mail list...

It doesn't matter. In the message #22928 (January 25th 2007) of that
list, you posted the names of the 34 members of the Spanish
association. A quick search within the album civium database reveals
that 29 of them are also citizens of Nova Roma, and only 5 are not.

So, as you can see, the 85,29% of the members of the Spanish
association are citizens of Nova Roma too. There wasn't any "majority
of non-citizens taking control of the association". That was a lie.

You asked me for a name. You can call me A Friend of Truth.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 49043 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-02-12
Subject: Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
Salvete MCC et omnes,

No paper,magazine or any of the electronic media in the world will
accept or publish any article of a person who says they are
anonymous or will not give their real name. It has been that way for
ages and that is one of the first things we were taught in school
with regards to proper writing and communication skills.

Regards,

QSP










--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M·C·C· <complutensis@...> wrote:
>
> Oh! An anonymous "friend of thuth"!
>
> "Rompipalle" will be a better name.
>
> The done affirmations anonymously do not deserve any respect. A
minimum norm of education demands to identify itself or to sign the
messages.
>
> gentisanglorum dixit: "You asked me for a name. You can call me
A Friend of Truth."
>
> ..............sound of
drums ...........................................
>
> Really do you think that you are a superhero?
>
> Vale
>
> M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
> TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
> SCRIBA CENSORIS GFBM
> NOVA ROMA
> -----------------------------------------
> ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
>
>
>
> ----- Mensaje original -----
> De: gentisanglorum
> Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Enviado: lunes, 12 de febrero de 2007 14:24
> Asunto: [Nova-Roma] Re: PROVINCIÆ HISPANIA ET BRITANNIA
>
>
> Compultensis:
>
> I've seen you've banned me from "nrhispania" mail list...
>
> It doesn't matter. In the message #22928 (January 25th 2007) of
that
> list, you posted the names of the 34 members of the Spanish
> association. A quick search within the album civium database
reveals
> that 29 of them are also citizens of Nova Roma, and only 5 are not.
>
> So, as you can see, the 85,29% of the members of the Spanish
> association are citizens of Nova Roma too. There wasn't
any "majority
> of non-citizens taking control of the association". That was a lie.
>
> You asked me for a name. You can call me A Friend of Truth.
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>