Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. May 1-14, 2007

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50124 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50125 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: Kal. Mai.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50126 From: Dora Smith Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50127 From: FAC Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: EDICTVM VII PRAEFECTIS ITALIAE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50128 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: The Senate is called to vote!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50129 From: Alison Tomkins Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: Living Symbol of the Glory of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50130 From: indyguy301 Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: Byzantine PC 3D images
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50131 From: L. Vitellius Triarius Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: Rossini Fest, May 5th - Knoxville, TN
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50132 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50133 From: Aulus Liburnius Hadrianus Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50134 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50135 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50136 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Nova Roma Taxes Due, 5/2/2007, 12:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50137 From: Dora Smith Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50138 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: a.d. VI Non. Mai.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50139 From: William Cox Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50140 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50141 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Fw: [SenatusRomanus] Senate is called to vote!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50142 From: Aulus Liburnius Hadrianus Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50143 From: C LeGros Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: creating a prayer?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50144 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50145 From: svetlozarpetkov Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: ROMAN SILVER FIGURE FOR SALE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50146 From: Aulus Liburnius Hadrianus Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50147 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50148 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: EX OFFICIO C. EQUITIUS CATO A. TULLIA SCHOLASTICA PRAETORES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50149 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: EX OFFICIO C. EQUITIUS CATO A. TULLIA SCHOLASTICA PRAETORES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50150 From: Aulus Liburnius Hadrianus Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50151 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: EX OFFICIO C. EQVITI CATONIS A. TVLLIAE SCHOLASTICAE PRAETORVM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50152 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: ATTN Cybernautae: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50153 From: Aulus Liburnius Hadrianus Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50154 From: ExLngHrn@aol.com Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: EX OFFICIO C. EQUITIUS CATO A. TULLIA SCHOLASTICA PRAETORES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50155 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: ATTN Cybernautae: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50156 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50157 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: EX OFFICIO C. EQUITIUS CATO A. TULLIA SCHOLASTICA PRAETORES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50158 From: ExLngHrn@aol.com Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: EX OFFICIO C. EQUITIUS CATO A. TULLIA SCHOLASTICA PRAETORES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50159 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: EX OFFICIO C. EQUITIUS CATO A. TULLIA SCHOLASTICA PRAETORES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50160 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: a.d. V Non. Mai.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50161 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation (Accent VS. Pronunciation)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50162 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: returnee seeks to assist us...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50163 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Report of the Senate Session
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50164 From: Jorge Hernandez Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Authentic Togas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50165 From: William Cox Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50166 From: geranioj@aol.com Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: Authentic Togas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50167 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: Authentic Togas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50168 From: Jorge Hernandez Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50169 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: EX OFFICIO C. EQVITI CATONIS A. TVLLIAE SCHOLASTICAE PRAETORVM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50170 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: a.d. IV NOn. Mai.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50171 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Nova Roma Taxes Due, 5/4/2007, 12:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50172 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Nova Roman Court List
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50173 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Nova Roman Court List
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50174 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Threats of violence from Q. Fabius Maximus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50175 From: William Cox Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50176 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: EDICTUM GAI EQUITI CATONI PRAETORIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50177 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM GAI EQUITI CATONI PRAETORIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50178 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM GAI EQUITI CATONI PRAETORIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50179 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: EDICTUM CENSORIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50180 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50181 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: VI Conventus Novae Romae, 5/5/2007, 12:00 am
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50182 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: DE PETITIONE ACTIONIS IN CAESONEM FABIVM BVTEONEM QVINTILIANVM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50183 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: DE PETITIONE ACTIONIS IN CAESONEM FABIVM BVTEONEM QVINTILIANVM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50184 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50185 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50186 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50187 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: a.d. IV NOn. Mai.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50188 From: marcuscorneliusdexter Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: a.d. IV NOn. Mai.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50189 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50190 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2007-05-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50191 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50192 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2007-05-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50193 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-05
Subject: a.d. III Non. Mai.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50194 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-05-05
Subject: ATTN Cybernautae: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50195 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2007-05-05
Subject: Re: EDICTA CENSORIS et PRAETORIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50196 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: prid. Non. Mai.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50197 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: Call for rogatores
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50198 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: IVS IVRANDVM - OATH OF OFFICE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50199 From: Joe Geranio Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: Julio Claudian Art, Roman Portraiture and Coins
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50200 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: Re: IVS IVRANDVM - OATH OF OFFICE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50201 From: Thomas Fulmer Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: Re: Call for rogatores
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50202 From: Mary Caldwell Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: Re: IVS IVRANDVM - OATH OF OFFICE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50203 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM GAI EQUITI CATONI PRAETORIS--A question, please?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50204 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM GAI EQUITI CATONI PRAETORIS--A question, please?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50205 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS--Point of common sense, please?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50206 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM GAI EQUITI CATONI PRAETORIS--A question, please?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50207 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS--Point of common sense, please?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50208 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-05-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS--Point of common sense, please?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50209 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-07
Subject: Non. Mai.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50210 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS--Point of common sense, please?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50211 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-05-07
Subject: Nova Roma Taxes Due, 5/7/2007, 12:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50212 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-05-07
Subject: Re: Call for rogatores
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50213 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS--Point of common sense, please?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50214 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-05-07
Subject: Apology to QFM, LSD, & LECA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50215 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-08
Subject: a.d. VIII Id. Mai.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50216 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-05-08
Subject: King Herod's Tomb Possibly Found?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50217 From: Mary Caldwell Date: 2007-05-08
Subject: I just passed my citizenship test!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50218 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-05-08
Subject: Re: I just passed my citizenship test!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50219 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-08
Subject: Re: I just passed my citizenship test!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50220 From: mrgrumpkin Date: 2007-05-08
Subject: The Childhood of Gaius Cassius Longinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50221 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-05-08
Subject: Re: I just passed my citizenship test!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50222 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-05-09
Subject: Re: The Childhood of Gaius Cassius Longinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50223 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-09
Subject: Re: I just passed my citizenship test!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50224 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-09
Subject: a.d. VII Id. Mai.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50225 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-05-09
Subject: Nova Roma Taxes Due, 5/9/2007, 12:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50226 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-05-09
Subject: Call For Rogator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50227 From: Jorge Hernandez Date: 2007-05-09
Subject: Re: The Childhood of Gaius Cassius Longinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50228 From: Titus Vergilius Catulus Date: 2007-05-09
Subject: Question about my account
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50229 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-05-09
Subject: Re: Question about my account
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50230 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-10
Subject: a.d. VI Id. Mai.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50231 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-05-10
Subject: Contribute to the Nova Roma Wiki, 5/10/2007, 12:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50232 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-11
Subject: a.d. V Id. Mai.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50233 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-05-11
Subject: Nova Roma Taxes Due, 5/11/2007, 12:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50234 From: decimus_iulius_caesar Date: 2007-05-11
Subject: Salve!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50235 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-05-11
Subject: Re: Salve!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50236 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-05-11
Subject: May 11st
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50237 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-05-11
Subject: VI Conventus Novae Romae, 5/12/2007, 12:00 am
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50238 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Mai.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50239 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50240 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50241 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50242 From: Mike T Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50243 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50244 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50245 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50246 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50247 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50248 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50249 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50250 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50251 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50252 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50253 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50254 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50255 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50256 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50257 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50258 From: L. Vitellius Triarius Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50259 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50260 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: a.d. III Id. Mai.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50261 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50262 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50263 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50264 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Meeting Aurelius Vindex in Dacia (photos).
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50265 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50266 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50267 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50268 From: Thomas Gangale Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50269 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50270 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50272 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50273 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50274 From: Thomas Gangale Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50275 From: Thomas Gangale Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50276 From: Gaius Aurelius Vindex Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Rif: [Nova-Roma] Meeting Aurelius Vindex in Dacia (photos).
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50277 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50278 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Meeting Aurelius Vindex in Dacia (photos).
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50279 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50280 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50281 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50282 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50283 From: Thomas Gangale Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50284 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Allegations of Intimidation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50285 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50286 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50287 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50288 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50289 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50290 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50291 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: prid. Id. Mai.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50292 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Nova Roma Taxes Due, 5/14/2007, 12:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50293 From: L. Vitellius Triarius Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50294 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50295 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50296 From: Thomas Gangale Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50297 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50298 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50299 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50300 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50124 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
Salvete

Better in my opinion to move this whole enterprise to the NR Wiki.
Make an article and use the Talk page to discuss issues. Do phonology
in real IPA, not an ASCII variant.

Optime valete

Agricola

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
<fororom@...> wrote:
>
> > A. Tullia Scholastica A. Liburnio T. Iulio Sabino quiritibus, sociis,
> > peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
> >
> >
> >
> > A. Liburnius Ti. Iulio omnibusque SPD
> >
> > Just to simplify the orthographic cacophony, I would propose that we
> > start using the ASCII SAMPA notation system as proposed by the
> > International Phonetic Alphabet.
> >
> > ATS: I seriously doubt that the IPA would survive a trip
across Yahoo
> > land, given the extreme difficulty we are having in my online
Greek course in
> > getting a simple, supposedly universal, Greek font to arrive in
legible form.
> > Moreover, apart from French speakers and scholars of French, very
few people
> > are truly familiar with the IPA...just about every French textbook
I have ever
> > seen has a chart of the IPA, but other language texts seem to do
very well
> > without it, and linguistics texts often use other notation.
> >
> >
> >
> > A chart with appropriate
> > explanations can be found at:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAMPA_chart
> >
> > The chart indicates where a sound originates in the mouth and which
> > sounds are the closest. It is intended for international usage,
> > eventhough the chart claims to be English only. I hope it may help
> > reduce some of the misunderstandings.
> >
> > Tite, as a curiosity, when was the Roman Alphabet introduced in
> > Romania and how was Latin written in Cyrillic?
> >
> > ATS: A little side note: Ti. is the abbreviation for
Tiberius; T. is
> > that for Titus, and it is not considered polite to address persons
who are not
> > one¹s family members, etc., by the praenomen alone.
> >
> > Vale atque Valete
> > A. Liburnius
>
> Valete.
> >
> > -- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "Titus
> > Iulius Sabinus"
> > <iulius_sabinus@> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > SALVETE!
> >> >
> >> > Using my friend Albucius example I want to present you the latin
> >> > pronunciation from my area.
> >> >
> >> > So:
> >> >
> >> > 1. ce, ci, gi - from: cena, Cicero, frigidus are: cena, Cicero,
> >> > frigidus.
> >> >
> >> > 2. ti + vowel - from: amicitia is: amicitsia.
> >> >
> >> > 3. s, x - from ostium, Sextius are: ostium, Sextius.
> >> >
> >> > 4. t + ti + vowel - from Vettius is Vetius.
> >> >
> >> > 5. ngu + vowel - from lingua, sanguis are: lingva, sangvis.
> >> >
> >> > 6. qu + vowel - from quinque, aqua are: cvincve, acva.
> >> >
> >> > 7. ch, ph, th - from chorus, pulcher, philosophus, theatrum are:
> >> > horus, pulher, filo:sofus, teatrum.
> >> >
> >> > 8. ae, oe - from caelum, poena are: celum, poena.
> >> >
> >> > 9. au, eu - from aurum, Europa are: au:rum, Eu:ro:pa.
> >> >
> >> > 10. ll, rr, pp - from vallis, ferrum, oppidum are: valis, ferum,
> >> > opidum.
> >> >
> >> > These are from my son Crassus latin book. What type of latin is?
> >> >
> >> > VALETE,
> >> > IVL SABINVS
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> >> "Publius Memmius Albucius"
> >> > <albucius_aoe@> wrote:
> >>>> > > > 3) French Latin
> >>> > >
> >>>> > > > C + E/AE/OE/I = "s"
> >>> > > Yes.
> >>> > >
> >>>> > > > G + E/AE/OE/I = "j" like in French "Jean"
> >>> > > Most of the times, not not always (sometimes hard G or Dj)
> >>> > >
> >>>> > > > TI + vowel = "si"
> >>> > > No : "ti" sliding on "tsi"
> >>> > >
> >>>> > > > AE, OE = "e" like in "men"
> >>> > > Yes.
> >>> > >
> >>>> > > > U = "ü"
> >>> > > Most, with exceptions ("ou")
> >>> > >
> >>>> > > > And some other particular details like ending -um is "om"
> >> > etc...
> >> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50125 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: Kal. Mai.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est Kalendis Maiis; haec dies nefastus publicus est.


"You ask where I think the name of May comes from?
Its origin's not totally clear to me.
As a traveller stands unsure which way to go,
Seeing the paths fan out in all directions,
So I'm not sure which to accept, since it's possible
To give different reasons: plenty itself confuses.
You who haunt the founts of Aganippian Hippocrene,
Those beloved prints of the Medusaean horse, explain!
The goddesses are in conflict. Polyhymnia begins,
While the others silently consider her speech.
'After the first Chaos, as soon as the three primary forms
Were given to the world, all things were newly re-configured:
Earth sank under its own weight, and drew down the seas,
But lightness lifted the sky to the highest regions:
And the sun and stars, not held back by their weight,
And you, you horses of the moon, sprang high.
But Earth for a long time wouldn't yield to Sky,
Nor the other lights to the Sun: honours were equal.
One of the common crowd of gods, would often dare
To sit on the throne that you, Saturn, owned,
None of the new gods took Ocean's side,
And Themis was relegated to the lowest place,
Until Honour, and proper Reverence, she
Of the calm look, were united in a lawful bed.
From them Majesty was born, she considers them
Her parents, she who was noble from her day of birth.
She took her seat, at once, high in the midst of Olympus,
Conspicuous, golden, in her purple folds.
Modesty and Fear sat with her: you could see
All the gods modelling their expression on hers.
At once, respect for honour entered their minds:
The worthy had their reward, none thought of self.
This state of things lasted for years in heaven,
Till the elder god was banished by fate from the citadel.
Earth bore the Giants, a fierce brood of savage monsters,
Who dared to venture against Jupiter's halls:
She gave them a thousands hands, serpents for legs,
And said: 'Take up arms against the mighty gods.'
They set to piling mountains to the highest stars,
And to troubling mighty Jupiter with war:
He hurled lightning bolts from the heavenly citadel,
And overturned the weighty mass on its creators.
These divine weapons protected Majesty well,
She survived, and has been worshipped ever since:
So she attends on Jove, Jove's truest guardian,
And allows him to hold the sceptre without force.
She came to earth as well: Romulus and Numa
Both worshipped her, and so did others in later ages.
She maintains fathers and mothers in due honour,
She keeps company with virgins and young boys,
She burnishes the lictor's rods, axes, and ivory chair,
She rides high in triumph behind the garlanded horses.'
Polyhymnia finished speaking: Clio, and Thalia
Mistress of the curved lyre, approved her words.
Urania continued: all the rest were silent,
And hers was the only voice that could be heard.
'Once great reverence was shown to white hair,
And wrinkled age was valued at its true worth.
The young waged work of war, and spirited battle,
Holding to their posts for the sake of the gods:
Age, inferior in strength, and unfit for arms,
Often did the country a service by its counsel.
The Senate was only open to men of mature age,
And Senators bear a name meaning ripe in years.
The elders made laws for the people, and specific
Rules governed the age when office might be sought:
Old men walked with the young, without their indignation,
And on the inside, if they only had one companion.
Who dared then to talk shamefully in an older man's
Presence? Old age granted rights of censorship.
Romulus knew this, and chose the City Fathers
From select spirits: making them the rulers of the City.
So I deduce that the elders (maiores) gave their own title
To the month of May: and looked after their own interests.
Numitor too may have said: 'Romulus, grant this month
To the old men' and his grandson may have yielded.
The following month, June, named for young men (iuvenes),
Gives no slight proof of the honour intended.'
Then Calliope herself, first of that choir, her hair
Unkempt and wreathed with ivy, began to speak:
'Tethys, the Titaness, was married long ago to Ocean,
He who encircles the outspread earth with flowing water.
The story is that their daughter Pleione was united
To sky-bearing Atlas, and bore him the Pleiades.
Among them, Maia's said to have surpassed her sisters
In beauty, and to have slept with mighty Jove.
She bore Mercury, who cuts the air on winged feet,
On the cypress-clothed ridge of Mount Cyllene.
The Arcadians, and swift Ladon, and vast Maenalus,
A land thought older than the moon, rightly worship him.
Evander, in exile from Arcadia, came to the Latin fields,
And brought his gods with him, aboard ship.
Where Rome, the capital of the world, now stands
There were trees, grass, a few sheep, the odd cottage.
When they arrived, his prophetic mother said:
'Halt here! This rural spot will be the place of Empire.'
The Arcadian hero obeyed his mother, the prophetess,
And stayed, though a stranger in a foreign land.
He taught the people many rites, but, above all, those
Of twin-horned Faunus, and Mercury the wing-footed god.
Faunus half-goat, you're worshipped by the girded Luperci,
When their strips of hide purify the crowded streets.
But you, Mercury, patron of thieves, inventor
Of the curved lyre, gave your mother's name to this month.
Nor was this your first act of piety: you're thought
To have given the lyre seven strings, the Pleiads' number.'
Calliope too ended: and her sisters voiced their praise.
And so? All three were equally convincing.
May the Muses' favour attend me equally,
And let me never praise one more than the rest." - Ovid, Fasti V

"The Kalends of May saw an altar dedicated
To the Guardian Lares, with small statues of the gods.
Curius vowed them: but time destroys many things,
And the long ages wear away the stone.
The reason for their epithet of Guardian,
Is that they keep safe watch over everything.
They support us, and protect the City walls,
And they're propitious, and bring us aid.
A dog, carved from the same stone, used to stand
At their feet: why did it stand there with the Lares?
Both guard the house: both are loyal to their master:
Crossroads are dear to the god, and to dogs.
Both the Lar and Diana's pack chase away thieves:
And the Lares are watchful, and so are dogs." - Ovid, Fasti V



Today is the Kalends of May; dedicated to Maia the mother of Mercury
(whose name gives us that of the whole month), and the Lares
praestites. Among the Lares publici we have mention of Lares
praestites and Lares compitales, who are in reality the same, and
differ only in regard to the place or occasion of their worship.

The temple to the Lares is first mentioned in connection with a series
of prodigious events (106 BC):

"Amiterni cum ex ancilla puer nasceretur, ave dixit. In agro Perusino
et Romae locis aliquot lacte pluit. Inter multa fulmine icta Atellis
digiti hominis quattuor tamquam ferro praecisi. Argentum signatum
afflatu fulminis diffluxit. In agro Trebulano mulier nupta civi Romano
fulmine icta nec exanimata. Fremitus caelestis auditus et pila caelo
cadere visa. Sanguine pluit. Romae interdiu fax sublime volans
conspecta. In aede Larum flamma a fastigio ad summum columen
penetravit innoxia. Per Caepionem consulem senatorum et equitum
iudicia communicata. Cetera in pace fuerunt." - Iulius Obsequens 41

And it was part of the original pomerium of the City:

"Regum in eo ambitio vel gloria varie vulgata: sed initium condendi,
et quod pomerium Romulus posuerit, noscere haud absurdum reor. igitur
a foro boario, ubi aereum tauri simulacrum aspicimus, quia id genus
animalium aratro subditur, sulcus designandi oppidi coeptus ut magnam
Herculis aram amplecteretur; inde certis spatiis interiecti lapides
per ima montis Palatini ad aram Consi, mox curias veteres, tum ad
sacellum Larum, inde forum Romanum; forumque et Capitolium non a
Romulo, sed a Tito Tatio additum urbi credidere. mox pro fortuna
pomerium auctum. et quos tum Claudius terminos posuerit, facile
cognitu et publicis actis perscriptum." - Tacitus, Annals xii.24

("There are various popular accounts of the ambitious and vainglorious
efforts of our kings in this matter. Still, I think, it is interesting
to know accurately the original plan of the precinct, as it was fixed
by Romulus. From the ox market, where we see the brazen statue of a
bull, because that animal is yoked to the plough, a furrow was drawn
to mark out the town, so as to embrace the great altar of Hercules;
then, at regular intervals, stones were placed along the foot of the
Palatine hill to the altar of Consus, soon afterwards, to the old
Courts, and then to the chapel of the Lares. The Roman forum and the
Capitol were not, it was supposed, added to the city by Romulus, but
by Titus Tatius. In time, the precinct was enlarged with the growth of
Rome's fortunes. The boundaries now fixed by Claudius may be easily
recognized, as they are specified in the public records.")

Servius Tullius is said to have instituted their worship; and when
Augustus improved the regulations of the city made by that king, he
also renewed the worship of the public Lares. Their name, Lares
praestites, characterises them as the protecting spirits of the city,
in which they had a temple in the uppermost part of the Via Sacra,
that is, near a compitum, whence they might be called compitales.
This temple (Sacellum La/rum or aedes Laruni) contained two images,
which were probably those of Romulus and Remus, and before them stood
a stone figure of a dog, either the symbol of watchfulness or because
a dog was the ordinary sacrifice offered to the Lares. Ovid says that
the figure of the dog represented Diana's protective pack.


"And Maia, the daughter of Atlas, bare to Zeus glorious Hermes, the
herald of the deathless gods, for she went up into his holy bed." -
Hesiod, Theogony 938

"He [Hermes] was born of Maia, the daughter of Atlas, when she had
mated with Zeus, a shy goddess she. Ever she avoided the throng of the
blessed gods and lived in a shadowy cave, and there the Son of Kronos
used to lie with the rich-tressed nymphe at dead of night, while
white-armed Hera lay bound in sweet sleep: and neither deathless god
nor mortal man knew it. And so hail to you, Son of Zeus and Maia." -
Homeric Hymn XVII to Hermes 3

"The oldest daughter Maia, after her intercourse with Zeus, bore
Hermes in a cave on Kyllene. Though he was laid out in swaddling-
clothes with her winnowing basket for a cradle, he escaped and made
his way to Pieria, where he stole some cattle that Apollon was
tending...Apollon learned who the thief was by divine science, and
made his way to Maia on Kyllene to charge Hermes. Maia, however,
showed Apollon the baby in his swaddling-clothes, whereupon Apollon
took him to Zeus and demanded his cattle." - Apollodorus, The Library
3.112

"The Pleiades" was the name given to the seven daughters of Atlas and
Pleione. Maia was the eldest of the daughters, and said to be the most
beautiful. Being shy, she lived quietly and alone in a cave on Mount
Cyllene, in Arcadia. Zeus, however, discovered the beautiful young
woman, and fell in love with her. He came to her cave at night, to
make love to her away from the jealous eyes of his wife, Hera. As a
result, Maia bore Zeus a son, Hermes.

When still an infant, Hermes stole some cattle from the god Apollo,
and hid them in his mother's cave. When Apollo stormed into Maia's
cave, she showed him the tiny baby to prove he could not have been the
cattle thief. Apollo was not fooled, however, and angrily appealed to
Zeus to punish Hermes. Zeus arbitrated by requiring Hermes to give
back the cattle. During the feud, baby Hermes played the lyre, and
Apollo was so enchanted by the music that he dropped the charges, and
even gave some of the cattle to Hermes, as well as other gifts.

Some time later, Maia helped Zeus when Hera had caused the death of
one of his other mistresses, Callisto, who had borne him a son, named
Arcas. Zeus ordered Hermes to give Arcas to Maia to raise as her own,
which she did. Arcas and Callisto were eventually placed in the sky,
becoming the constellations Ursa Major and Ursa Minor (Big and Little
Bear) to escape the wrath of the ever-jealous Hera.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Tacitus, Iulius Obsequens, Homer, Apollodorus, Hesiod, Smith's
Dictionary, Maia (http://www.pantheon.org/articles/m/maia.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50126 From: Dora Smith Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
Whether you regard Constantine as Christian depends on how you define a
Christian, and on why you are asking.

Properly speaking, Constantine was what Evangelicals today call a pagan
Christian. He believed in the Sun God, and he thought Christ was one.
That did not disturb the ancient mind the way it disturbs us today; in fact,
the people who wrote the entire nativity story of Mithras into the Gospel
accounts of Christ's birth hardly thought it was literally Jesus' personal
history. He claimed to have had one of those visions that enable major
shifts in religious affiliation, by noticing and making sense in a new way
of similarities in the mythologies of two competing religions; for example,
the Virgin of Guadeloupe. His vision showed that Apollo and Mithras were
now the Christ, and helped people believe that.

Constantine can hardly have been called a devout anything on a personal
level. He was crude, and unscrupulous, and ambitious, and he wanted a
faith that could unite his empire. He carefully nurtured and built the
Christian Church but may not have been a Christian on a personal level in
ways you or I would have been happy with. On the other hand, he clearly
believed in Christian doctrine on some level.

He was baptized on his death bed because he believed he had to be to go to
heaven. He thought if he were baptized earlier and committed any more of
the heinous sins he constantly committed for the sake of his ambition, he
could not go to Heaven. There wasn't no penitence involved, though
doubtless his bishop allies piously said there was.

Yours,
Dora Smith
Austin, TX
tiggernut24@...

----- Original Message -----
From: cmcqueeny
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 10:12 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian





--
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.465 / Virus Database: 269.5.7/771 - Release Date: 4/21/2007 11:56 AM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50127 From: FAC Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: EDICTVM VII PRAEFECTIS ITALIAE
EX OFFICIO PRAEFECTIS ITALIAE
Edictum VIII

L'Illustre Propraetor Titus Iulius Sabinus ha invitato i cittadini
novaromani residenti in Italia a visitare la Romania romana. Gaius
Aurelius Vindex ha accettato l'invito nel nome della fraterna
amicizia fra Dacia e Italia ed è ora in visita a Bucharest.

1. L'Illustre Gaius Aurelius Vindex è nominato Legatus pro tempore
fino al 10 maggio 2007 ed èautorizzato a rappresentare l'Italia e la
sua amministrazione nei rapporti diplomatici fra le due Provinciae.

Questo editto ha effetto immediato

This edict is effective immediately.

Datum sub manu mea Kalendis Mai MMDCCLX a.u.c. (1° maggio 2007)

Nel consolato di Lucius Arminis Faustus and Tiberius Galerius
Paulinus

-----------------------

Illustrus Propraetor Titus Iulius Sabinus invited the italian
novaromansto visit the roman Romania. Illustrus Gaius Aurelius
Vindex accepted the invitation under the freindship between Dacia
and Italia and now he's visiting Bucarest.

I. Illustrus Gaius Aurelius Vindex si appointed Legatus "pro
tempore" until May 10th 2007 and he's authorized to rapresent Italia
and its government in the diplomatic relations with Dacia.

This edict is effective immediately.

Datum sub manu mea Kalendis Mai MMDCCLX a.u.c. (April 19, 2007)

In the consulship of Lucius Arminis Faustus and Tiberius Galerius
Paulinus

FR.APVLVS CAESAR
Praefectus Italiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50128 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: The Senate is called to vote!
M. Curiatius Complutensis Tribunus Plebis omnes civibus SPD


Consul Faustus has called the Senate to vote the following:

PREAMBLE

Recently, a contradiction has arisen about the real name a governor should have.

The "Senatus Consultum (XIX) : Standardization of Titles for Provincial Magistrates Adopted August 7, 2751)" (therefore called SC XIX) was appointed by Consul Faustus as being in contradiction with NR Constituion, by allowing the governors to be called as "Praetor" while NR Constituion and Roman History clearly states a Praetor is to be elected by the Comitia Centuriata. The Consul observed that in case of Contradiction, the Constituion should take precedence, so SC XIX was void. The Consul also warned SC XIX could cause lots of problems on our legal system, since NR has not a Poemerium to bound the ´macronational´ magistrates and the ´provincial´ magistrates. Consul Faustus observes SC XIX was ´dead letter´ until now and it is in contradiction with later leges, Senatusconsulta and edicta.

I see no better way than relying to the wiseness of the Senatores, since they approved the SC XIX for the very first time, and, in certain sense, giving power to it. As a Republican solution, the Senate is invited to solve the question voting on the proposal below to prepare us any further changes on our legal system. The Senatores
are invited to confirm SC XIX or to revoke it. The Senatores are invited to discuss deeply the question and ponder it with all their love for Nova Roma.

Past Consules had asked the Comitia and Senate to revoke approved laws and Senatusconsulta which interpretation could generate contradiction with the Constitution. So, it is a republican and democratic solution extensively being done by Nova Roma.

PROPOSAL

I. Should the SC XIX ("Senatus Consultum (XIX) : Standardization of Titles for Provincial Magistrates Adopted August 7, 2751)") be revoked due to its contradition with the NR Constituion, as stated by Consul L. Arminius Faustus?

Vote UTI ROGAS to revoke the SC XIX. Therefore, governors are to be called propraetores, and they will be called proconsules if the governor already was or is consul of Nova Roma.

Vote ANTIQVO to deny this proposal of revogation and keep SC XIX.

If Antiqvo wins, Consul Faustus will withdraw his objections listed above in obedience to the Senate. Until this Senate section is ended, Consul Faustus assumes the compromise to not use its constitutional prerrogative of Consular Intercessio against the uses of SC XIX in contradiction with the Constitution, according his interpretation.

***

Due to the nature of May, the Contio starts 5 May (to observe the notification period) and goes until 8 May. Days 9, 11, 13 and 15 are nefasti. So, although 10, 12 and 14 are comitialis, I prefer to start the voting on the continous Comitialis, ie, the voting starts 17 May and ends 20 May. A day will start at 0:00 Rome Time and will end at
23:59.

Contio: 5 (II. Ant. Id.) - 8 May (VII. Ant. Id.)
Voting: 17 (XIV. Ant. Kal. Iun.) - 20 May (XI. Ant. Kal. Iun.)

(Source: http://www.novaroma.org/calendar/maius.html)

The auspices were favourable, so I call the Senate to discuss and vote the matter above.

--
Valete bene in pacem deorum,
L. Arminius Faustus

"Vigilando, agendo, bene consulendo, prospera omnia cedunt" - Salustius



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50129 From: Alison Tomkins Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: Living Symbol of the Glory of Rome
Salvete, omnes.

I do not often post to the main list with my private beliefs and causes, but this one is exceptional, and urgent.

Because of the wolf who saved the lives of Romulus and Remus, all good Romans should honor all wolves, and should extend to them every compassionate service within our power. No matter our macronationality, we should feel the same emotional stake in the survival of wolves as we do in the survival of the imperial eagle. (See: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aquilaheliaca/ )

Time is short. Please go to the following site today. Sorry; I don’t know how to make tinyurls; please make sure you copy-paste all parts of the URL into your search field.

https://secure2.convio.net/dow/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&page=UserAction&id=651&s_einterest=C3C4&JServSessionIdr007=oo87uzsxv4.app25a

Thank you for your time and attention. And now, back to our regularly scheduled program.

Valete! Habitetis in luce deorum!
Volentia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50130 From: indyguy301 Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: Byzantine PC 3D images
Here is a link for reconstructed 3D images of Byzantine buildings if
your a fan of architecture you might like this :
http://www.byzantium1200.com/contents.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50131 From: L. Vitellius Triarius Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: Rossini Fest, May 5th - Knoxville, TN
Salvete omnes,

Everyone is invited to attend the Italian Street Festival, Rossini
Fest, this Saturday, May 5th, in Knoxville, TN. Mix, meet & mingle
with other romani, eat very well, and have a very good Saturday.

Nova Romans will be manning a booth in the Legio V Alaudae encampment
section for the event. We will be set up in the 200 Market Street area.

For more information, visit these websites:

Fifth Legion Website:
http://web.utk.edu/~cohprima/

Knoxville Opera's Rossini Fest Website:
http://www.knoxvilleopera.com/rossini/index.html

We hope to see you there, in or out of Roman dress.

Vale optime,
Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50132 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
Scaurus Quiritibus SPD.

This issue is more complex than has been suggested and is laden with
layers of hagiography which make it difficult to actually access the
form and content of Constantine's conversion. Certainly by the
mid-320s he was heavily invested in Christianity as a strategy of
regime stabilisation. The suggestion that Constantine saw Christ as a
sun god rests on a confusion between numismatic perseverance of the
Sol Invictus motif (which was military in nature sinced Aurelian and
probably did not reflect the personal views of the sovereign) and the
pollitical role of Christianity.

I confess that I find the canonisation of Constantine a tad ironic,
since there is no question that he died an Arian (he had already
exiled Athanasius) and, given the way that that heresy was
anathematised by later church councils, if the Christians are right,
he should be sweltering in hell. It's rather like polytheists
embracing Julian's hairbrained Hellenistic eclectism as if it had
anything to do with the Religio Romana.

Valete.

Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50133 From: Aulus Liburnius Hadrianus Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation
A. Hadrianus M. Hortensia Quiritibusque S.P.D

I apologize for the delay in replying, but a pesky thing, called
work, got in the way. The ASCII SAMPA alphabet uses only keys found
on any keyboard. Most letters are written as is, exceptions are
encapsulated in slashes, like this /. Stress is indicated by ["] for
primary stress, and [%] for secondary stress, placed before the
stressed syllable.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAMPA_chart

The Florentine examples you cite, would be rendered as:
Citta = /S/itt"a
Chiamo = /C/i"amo
Giovane = /Z/"o/vane


Please note that the stressed o in 'Giovane' is short and that all
fricatives and palatals are pronunced very softly.
But, in my Venetian dialect, the stress and spelling would remain
the same, but the pronunciation would change to:

Citta = /ts/it"a
Chiamo = /tS/"amo
Giovane = /dz/"oane

Ugly, but not unworkable, and understood worldwide, particularly if
it is assumed that stress indicators are unnecessary.

As for the question of who 'speaks a phonetically better italian'
there are still debates. Fortunately we don't have a 'King's
Italian' to impose rules...

Vale atque Valete
A. Liburnius Hadrianus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia Cn. Lentulo Q. Valerio spd;
> Lentule, I'd forgotten a good example for you about varying
> pronunciation of letters & in Italian. Italians from the city of
> Florence, pronounce c, in città, like sh in shop, additionally
> the 'ch' in 'chiamo' is pronounced as 'ch' in loch, g
in 'giovane' is
> like 'j' in French 'journal.'
> Liburne, if someone can help me I'll make the example in
IPA,
> just don't know how to.
> I know this as my Italian professor, spoke this way & came
from
> an ancient papal family. In fact he passed his accent on to me &
when
> I was in Florence, was taken for a native. In private, he used to
say,
> that the Florentine accent was superior to the Roman, as the great
> creators of Italian literature, Petrarch & Dante, were Florentines.
>
> Callide, do you speak Esperanto? how interesting.
> bene valete
> M. Hortensia Maior
> producer 'Vox Romana' podcast
> http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > Salvete!
> >
> > Anyone take into account pronouncing Latin at conversational
speeds?
> > Over time, the pronunciation might change.
> >
> >
> >
> > I find a similar situation with Esperanto.
> >
> > Valete,
> > Q. Valerius Callidus
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50134 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-05-01
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
Salve Pontifex Scaure,

Last count there are about 10,000 saints in the RC church and I have
often questioned the irony of how some got there. As mentioned
Constantine is a saint in the Greek Orthodox Church and apparently
even Governor Pontius Pilate is a saint in the Coptic church.

As an analogy,all my life I have never figured how Joan Of Arc got
to be a saint.Christ did not encourage military solutions or
violence in problem solving and the Hundred Year War was before the
Reformation so the war was RC vs RC over keeping rulers in their
right place. As new ideas come to light, I cannot help but wonder
sometimes if Joan was a victim of that ergot wheat fungus which
conjured up hallucinations and other things.

Regards,

QSP






--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gregory Rose" <gregory.rose@...>
wrote:
>
> Scaurus Quiritibus SPD.
>
> This issue is more complex than has been suggested and is laden
with
> layers of hagiography which make it difficult to actually access
the
> form and content of Constantine's conversion. Certainly by the
> mid-320s he was heavily invested in Christianity as a strategy of
> regime stabilisation. The suggestion that Constantine saw Christ
as a
> sun god rests on a confusion between numismatic perseverance of the
> Sol Invictus motif (which was military in nature sinced Aurelian
and
> probably did not reflect the personal views of the sovereign) and
the
> pollitical role of Christianity.
>
> I confess that I find the canonisation of Constantine a tad
ironic,
> since there is no question that he died an Arian (he had already
> exiled Athanasius) and, given the way that that heresy was
> anathematised by later church councils, if the Christians are
right,
> he should be sweltering in hell. It's rather like polytheists
> embracing Julian's hairbrained Hellenistic eclectism as if it had
> anything to do with the Religio Romana.
>
> Valete.
>
> Scaurus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50135 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
M. Hortensia Q. Suetonio;
actually I think the Orthodox version is Pilate converted.
But anyway Christians today aren't responsible for their historical
past. It's not facing these kinds of things that upsets me, I was
very sensitive about Cato's remark during Good Friday about the Jews
abandoning Jesus..
I don't think Cato even thought of it; but with the shock I had
about my father's family it made those words all too real. I want to
apologize to you, Cato and all the Christians here for my harsh
words. At the time I just wanted you to feel some of the hurt I had,
but that's wrong.
I have a close friend an Irish Protestant bishop & we discuss a
lot of these things.

I would say Christians today have the same situation in Muslim
countries, where they are persecuted, murdered & second-class
citizens. 3 Christian ministers were tortured & murdered by
fundamentalists, in Turkey just recently. Terrible.
bene vale
M. Hortensia Maior
producer 'Vox Romana' podcast
http://www.insualumbra.com/voxromana/

> Last count there are about 10,000 saints in the RC church and I
have
> often questioned the irony of how some got there. As mentioned
> Constantine is a saint in the Greek Orthodox Church and apparently
> even Governor Pontius Pilate is a saint in the Coptic church.
>
> As an analogy,all my life I have never figured how Joan Of Arc got
> to be a saint.Christ did not encourage military solutions or
> violence in problem solving and the Hundred Year War was before
the
> Reformation so the war was RC vs RC over keeping rulers in their
> right place. As new ideas come to light, I cannot help but wonder
> sometimes if Joan was a victim of that ergot wheat fungus which
> conjured up hallucinations and other things.
>
> Regards,
>
> QSP
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gregory Rose" <gregory.rose@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Scaurus Quiritibus SPD.
> >
> > This issue is more complex than has been suggested and is laden
> with
> > layers of hagiography which make it difficult to actually access
> the
> > form and content of Constantine's conversion. Certainly by the
> > mid-320s he was heavily invested in Christianity as a strategy of
> > regime stabilisation. The suggestion that Constantine saw
Christ
> as a
> > sun god rests on a confusion between numismatic perseverance of
the
> > Sol Invictus motif (which was military in nature sinced Aurelian
> and
> > probably did not reflect the personal views of the sovereign)
and
> the
> > pollitical role of Christianity.
> >
> > I confess that I find the canonisation of Constantine a tad
> ironic,
> > since there is no question that he died an Arian (he had already
> > exiled Athanasius) and, given the way that that heresy was
> > anathematised by later church councils, if the Christians are
> right,
> > he should be sweltering in hell. It's rather like polytheists
> > embracing Julian's hairbrained Hellenistic eclectism as if it had
> > anything to do with the Religio Romana.
> >
> > Valete.
> >
> > Scaurus
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50136 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Nova Roma Taxes Due, 5/2/2007, 12:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Nova Roma Taxes Due
 
Date:   Wednesday May 2, 2007
Time:   12:00 pm - 1:00 pm
Repeats:   This event repeats every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday until Thursday May 31, 2007.
Notes:   The Tax Edict (rates, address, other info) is at http://novaroma.org/nr/Tax_rate_%28Nova_Roma%29

NEW! Pay through the Album Civium!

* 1. log in at Album Civium ( http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album )
* 2. go to My Account
* 3. go to "make payment"
* 4. add citizens to the list if paying for multiple citizens
* 5. choose pay pal or check
* 6. if choosing pay pal, continue through pay pal until it sends you back to My Account
* 7. if choosing check, print and mail

 
Copyright © 2007  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50137 From: Dora Smith Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
A Pacifist Roman?

Yours,
Dora Smith
Austin, TX
tiggernut24@...
----- Original Message -----
From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 9:44 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian


Salve Pontifex Scaure,

Last count there are about 10,000 saints in the RC church and I have
often questioned the irony of how some got there. As mentioned
Constantine is a saint in the Greek Orthodox Church and apparently
even Governor Pontius Pilate is a saint in the Coptic church.

As an analogy,all my life I have never figured how Joan Of Arc got
to be a saint.Christ did not encourage military solutions or
violence in problem solving and the Hundred Year War was before the
Reformation so the war was RC vs RC over keeping rulers in their
right place. As new ideas come to light, I cannot help but wonder
sometimes if Joan was a victim of that ergot wheat fungus which
conjured up hallucinations and other things.

Regards,

QSP

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gregory Rose" <gregory.rose@...>
wrote:
>
> Scaurus Quiritibus SPD.
>
> This issue is more complex than has been suggested and is laden
with
> layers of hagiography which make it difficult to actually access
the
> form and content of Constantine's conversion. Certainly by the
> mid-320s he was heavily invested in Christianity as a strategy of
> regime stabilisation. The suggestion that Constantine saw Christ
as a
> sun god rests on a confusion between numismatic perseverance of the
> Sol Invictus motif (which was military in nature sinced Aurelian
and
> probably did not reflect the personal views of the sovereign) and
the
> pollitical role of Christianity.
>
> I confess that I find the canonisation of Constantine a tad
ironic,
> since there is no question that he died an Arian (he had already
> exiled Athanasius) and, given the way that that heresy was
> anathematised by later church councils, if the Christians are
right,
> he should be sweltering in hell. It's rather like polytheists
> embracing Julian's hairbrained Hellenistic eclectism as if it had
> anything to do with the Religio Romana.
>
> Valete.
>
> Scaurus
>




----------

Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.465 / Virus Database: 269.5.7/771 - Release Date: 4/21/2007 11:56 AM


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50138 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: a.d. VI Non. Mai.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem VI Nones Maius; haec dies fastus aterque est.

"When Hyperion's daughter puts the stars to flight,
Raising her light, behind her horses of dawn,
A cold north-westerly will smooth the wheat-tips,
White sails will put out from Calabrian waters.
And when shadowy twilight leads on the night,
No part of the whole herd of Hyades is unknown.
The radiant head of Taurus glitters with seven flames,
That Greek sailors named the Hyades, from `rain' (hyein):
Some think they nursed Bacchus, others believe
They're the granddaughters of Tethys and old Ocean.
Atlas was not yet standing there, his shoulders weighed
By Olympus, when Hyas, known for his beauty, was born:
Aethra, of Ocean's lineage, gave birth to him
And the nymphs at full term, but Hyas was born first.
When the down was new on his cheeks, he scared away
The frightened deer, in terror, and a hare was a good prize.
But when his courage had grown with his years, he dared
To close with wild boar and shaggy lionesses,
And while seeking the lair of a pregnant lioness, and her cubs,
He himself was the bloodstained victim of that Libyan beast.
His mother and his saddened sisters wept for Hyas,
And Atlas, soon doomed to bow his neck beneath the pole,
But the sisters' love was greater than either parent's:
It won them the heavens: Hyas gave them his name.
`Mother of the flowers, approach, so we can honour you
With joyful games! Last month I deferred the task.
You begin in April, and pass into May's span:
One claims you fleeing, the other as it comes on.
Since the boundaries of the months are yours,
And defer to you, either's fitting for your praise.
This is the month of the Circus' Games, and the victors' palm
The audience applauds: let my song accompany the Circus' show.
Tell me, yourself, who you are. Men's opinions err:
You'll be the best informant regarding your own name.'
So I spoke. So the goddess responded to my question,
(While she spoke, her lips breathed out vernal roses):
`I, called Flora now, was Chloris: the first letter in Greek
Of my name, became corrupted in the Latin language.
I was Chloris, a nymph of those happy fields,
Where, as you've heard, fortunate men once lived.
It would be difficult to speak of my form, with modesty,
But it brought my mother a god as son-in-law.
It was spring, I wandered: Zephyrus saw me: I left.
He followed me: I fled: he was the stronger,
And Boreas had given his brother authority for rape
By daring to steal a prize from Erechtheus' house.
Yet he made amends for his violence, by granting me
The name of bride, and I've nothing to complain of in bed.
I enjoy perpetual spring: the season's always bright,
The trees have leaves: the ground is always green.
I've a fruitful garden in the fields that were my dower,
Fanned by the breeze, and watered by a flowing spring.
My husband stocked it with flowers, richly,
And said: "Goddess, be mistress of the flowers."
I often wished to tally the colours set there,
But I couldn't, there were too many to count.
As soon as the frosted dew is shaken from the leaves,
And the varied foliage warmed by the sun's rays,
The Hours gather dressed in colourful clothes,
And collect my gifts in slender baskets.
The Graces, straight away, draw near, and twine
Wreaths and garlands to bind their heavenly hair.
I was first to scatter fresh seeds among countless peoples,
Till then the earth had been a single colour.
I was first to create the hyacinth, from Spartan blood,
And a lament remains written on its petals.
You too, Narcissus, were known among the gardens,
Unhappy that you were not other, and yet were other.
Why tell of Crocus, or Attis, or Adonis, son of Cinyras,
From whose wounds beauty springs, through me?
Mars too, if you're unaware, was brought to birth
By my arts: I pray unknowing Jupiter never knows it.
Sacred Juno grieved that Jupiter didn't need
Her help, when motherless Minerva was born.
She went to Ocean to complain of her husband's deeds:
Tired by the effort she rested at my door.
Catching sight of her, I said: "Why are you here, Saturnia?"
She explained what place she sought, and added
The reason. I consoled her with words of friendship:
She said: "My cares can't be lightened by words.
If Jove can be a father without needing a wife,
And contains both functions in a single person,
Why should I despair of becoming a mother with no
Husband, and, chaste, give birth though untouched by man?
I'll try all the drugs in the whole wide world,
And search the seas, and shores of Tartarus."
Her voice flew on: but my face showed doubt.
She said: "Nymph, it seems you have some power."
Three times I wanted to promise help, three times my tongue
Was tied: mighty Jupiter's anger was cause for fear.
She said: "Help me, I beg you, I'll conceal the fact,
And I'll call on the powers of the Stygian flood as witness."
"A flower, sent to me from the fields of Olenus,
Will grant what you seek," I replied, "unique, in all my garden.
He who gave it to me said: `Touch a barren heifer with this,
And she'll be a mother too.' I did, and she was, instantly."
With that, I nipped the clinging flower with my thumb,
Touched Juno, and as I touched her breast she conceived.
Pregnant now, she travelled to Thrace and the northern shores
Of Propontis: her wish was granted, and Mars was born.
Mindful of his birth that he owed to me, he said:
"You too must have a place in Romulus' City."
Perhaps you think I only rule over tender garlands.
But my power also commands the farmers' fields.
If the crops have flourished, the threshing-floor is full:
If the vines have flourished, there'll be wine:
If the olive trees have flourished, the year will be bright,
And the fruit will prosper at the proper time.
If the flower's damaged, the beans and vetch die,
And your imported lentils, Nile, die too.
Wine too, laboriously stored in the vast cellars,
Froths, and clouds the wine jars' surface with mist.
Honey's my gift: I call the winged ones who make
Honey, to the violets, clover and pale thyme.
I carry out similar functions, when spirits
Run riot, and bodies themselves flourish.'
I admired her, in silence, while she spoke. But she said:
`You may learn the answer to any of your questions.'
`Goddess', I replied: `What's the origin of the games?'
I'd barely ended when she answered me:
`Rich men owned cattle or tracts of land,
Other means of wealth were then unknown,
So the words `rich' (locuples) from `landed' (locus plenus),
And `money' (pecunia) from `a flock' (pecus), but already
Some had unlawful wealth: by custom, for ages,
Public lands were grazed, without penalty.
Folk had no one to defend the common rights:
Till at last it was foolish to use private grazing.
This licence was pointed out to the Publicii,
The plebeian aediles: earlier, men lacked confidence.
The case was tried before the people: the guilty fined:
And the champions praised for their public spirit.
A large part of the fine fell to me: and the victors
Instituted new games to loud applause. Part was allocated
To make a way up the Aventine's slope, then steep rock:
Now it's a serviceable track, called the Publician Road.'
I believed the shows were annual. She contradicted it,
And added further words to her previous speech:
`Honour touches me too: I delight in festivals and altars:
We're a greedy crowd: we divine beings.
Often, through their sins, men render the gods hostile,
And, fawning, offer a sacrifice for their crimes:
Often I've seen Jupiter, about to hurl his lightning,
Draw back his hand, when offered a gift of incense.
But if we're ignored, we avenge the injury
With heavy penalties, and our anger passes all bounds.
Remember Meleager, burnt up by distant flames:
The reason, because Diana's altar lacked its fires.
Remember Agamemnon: the same goddess becalmed the fleet:
A virgin, yet still she twice avenged her neglected hearth.
Wretched Hippolytus, you wished you'd worshipped Venus,
When your terrified horses were tearing you apart.
It would take too long to tell of neglect punished by loss.
I too was once neglected by the Roman Senate.
What to do, how to show my indignation?
What punishment to exact for the harm done me?
Gloomily, I gave up my office. I ceased to protect
The countryside, cared nothing for fruitful gardens:
The lilies drooped: you could see the violets fade,
And the petals of the purple crocus languished.
Often Zephyr said: `Don't destroy your dowry.'
But my dowry was worth nothing to me.
The olives were in blossom: wanton winds hurt them:
The wheat was ripening: hail blasted the crops:
The vines were promising: skies darkened from the south,
And the leaves were brought down by sudden rain.
I didn't wish it so: I'm not cruel in my anger,
But I neglected to drive away these ills.
The Senate convened, and voted my godhead
An annual festival, if the year proved fruitful.
I accepted their vow. The consuls Laenas
And Postumius celebrated these games of mine.
I was going to ask why there's greater
Wantonness in her games, and freer jests,
But it struck me that the goddess isn't strict,
And the gifts she brings are agents of delight.
The drinker's brow's wreathed with sewn-on garlands,
And a shower of roses hides the shining table:
The drunken guest dances, hair bound with lime-tree bark,
And unaware employs the wine's purest art:
The drunken lover sings at beauty's harsh threshold,
And soft garlands crown his perfumed hair.
Nothing serious for those with garlanded brow,
No running water's drunk, when crowned with flowers:
While your stream, Achelous, was free of wine,
No one as yet cared to pluck the rose.
Bacchus loves flowers: you can see he delights
In a crown, from Ariadne's chaplet of stars.
The comic stage suits her: she's never: believe me,
Never been counted among the tragic goddesses.
The reason the crowd of whores celebrate these games
Is not a difficult one for us to discover.
The goddess isn't gloomy, she's not high-flown,
She wants her rites to be open to the common man,
And warns us to use life's beauty while it's in bloom:
The thorn is spurned when the rose has fallen.
Why is it, when white robes are handed out for Ceres,
Flora's neatly dressed in a host of colours?
Is it because the harvest's ripe when the ears whiten,
But flowers are of every colour and splendour?
She nods, and flowers fall as her hair flows,
As roses fall when they're scattered on a table.
There's still the lights, whose reason escaped me,
Till the goddess dispelled my ignorance like this:
`Lights are thought to be fitting for my day,
Because the fields glow with crimson flowers,
Or because flowers and flames aren't dull in colour,
And the splendour of them both attracts the eye:
Or because the licence of night suits my delights,
And this third reason's nearest to the truth.'
`There's one little thing besides, for me to ask,
If you'll allow,' I said: and she said: `It's allowed.'
`Why then are gentle deer and shy hares
Caught in your nets, not Libyan lionesses?'
She replied that gardens not woodlands were her care,
And fields where no wild creatures were allowed.
All was ended: and she vanished into thin air: yet
Her fragrance lingered: you'd have known it was a goddess.
Scatter your gifts, I beg you, over my breast,
So Ovid's song may flower forever." - Ovid, Fasti V

Valete bene!

cato



SOURCES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50139 From: William Cox Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
I would add that Constantine was chastised by his
sister for having political rivals murdered after
publicly forgiving them, and setting them free
(forgiving enemies is the Christian thing to do).
He might have been a Nevo-Christian but he was also a
bit power hungry. As for political reasons for him
being Christian I recall (reading somewhere)that by
his time the Empire as a whole was 10-15% with most
being in the Cities, and after years of Civil war
(Rome was gutting itself every 10-15
years)Christianity was a untapped support base that he
would have needed.

Also I saw something on the three missionaries
(missionaries is kind of misleading since at least one
was a Christian Turk)killed in Turkey which mentioned
that one (of the three) was Jailed for handing out
Bibles earlier (either late last year or earlier this
year).Turkey is a secular nation but is it a crime to
hand out all religion,or the non Islamic
branches(think of this as a informal question).

--- Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:

> M. Hortensia Q. Suetonio;
> actually I think the Orthodox version is
> Pilate converted.
> But anyway Christians today aren't responsible for
> their historical
> past. It's not facing these kinds of things that
> upsets me, I was
> very sensitive about Cato's remark during Good
> Friday about the Jews
> abandoning Jesus..
> I don't think Cato even thought of it; but with
> the shock I had
> about my father's family it made those words all too
> real. I want to
> apologize to you, Cato and all the Christians here
> for my harsh
> words. At the time I just wanted you to feel some of
> the hurt I had,
> but that's wrong.
> I have a close friend an Irish Protestant bishop
> & we discuss a
> lot of these things.
>
> I would say Christians today have the same
> situation in Muslim
> countries, where they are persecuted, murdered &
> second-class
> citizens. 3 Christian ministers were tortured &
> murdered by
> fundamentalists, in Turkey just recently. Terrible.
> bene vale
> M. Hortensia Maior
> producer 'Vox Romana' podcast
>
> http://www.insualumbra.com/voxromana/
>
> > Last count there are about 10,000 saints in the RC
> church and I
> have
> > often questioned the irony of how some got there.
> As mentioned
> > Constantine is a saint in the Greek Orthodox
> Church and apparently
> > even Governor Pontius Pilate is a saint in the
> Coptic church.
> >
> > As an analogy,all my life I have never figured how
> Joan Of Arc got
> > to be a saint.Christ did not encourage military
> solutions or
> > violence in problem solving and the Hundred Year
> War was before
> the
> > Reformation so the war was RC vs RC over keeping
> rulers in their
> > right place. As new ideas come to light, I cannot
> help but wonder
> > sometimes if Joan was a victim of that ergot wheat
> fungus which
> > conjured up hallucinations and other things.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > QSP
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gregory Rose"
> <gregory.rose@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Scaurus Quiritibus SPD.
> > >
> > > This issue is more complex than has been
> suggested and is laden
> > with
> > > layers of hagiography which make it difficult to
> actually access
> > the
> > > form and content of Constantine's conversion.
> Certainly by the
> > > mid-320s he was heavily invested in Christianity
> as a strategy of
> > > regime stabilisation. The suggestion that
> Constantine saw
> Christ
> > as a
> > > sun god rests on a confusion between numismatic
> perseverance of
> the
> > > Sol Invictus motif (which was military in nature
> sinced Aurelian
> > and
> > > probably did not reflect the personal views of
> the sovereign)
> and
> > the
> > > pollitical role of Christianity.
> > >
> > > I confess that I find the canonisation of
> Constantine a tad
> > ironic,
> > > since there is no question that he died an Arian
> (he had already
> > > exiled Athanasius) and, given the way that that
> heresy was
> > > anathematised by later church councils, if the
> Christians are
> > right,
> > > he should be sweltering in hell. It's rather
> like polytheists
> > > embracing Julian's hairbrained Hellenistic
> eclectism as if it had
> > > anything to do with the Religio Romana.
> > >
> > > Valete.
> > >
> > > Scaurus
> > >
> >
>
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50140 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
Salvete omnes,

One question that pops up more and more on media shows and forums
regarding the rights of newcomers to my marco nation is that we bend
over backwards and even legislate protection for various groups and
minorities who settle here but would they do the same, IE go to bat
for any of us if we were in their country?

Hmmm, the situation metioned below will certainly not help Turkey's
case for entrance into the EUC unless the jailed are released and the
murderer's of the third chap are severely punished with lengthy jail
terms. As the current pope said, Europe and America bends over
backwards and allows mosques to be built and the existence of Islamic
schools so isn't about time the Islamic world reciprocates? Sigh,well
try and imagine what would happen to those unfortunates promoting the
Religio over there!

QSP



>
> Also I saw something on the three missionaries
> (missionaries is kind of misleading since at least one
> was a Christian Turk)killed in Turkey which mentioned
> that one (of the three) was Jailed for handing out
> Bibles earlier (either late last year or earlier this
> year).Turkey is a secular nation but is it a crime to
> hand out all religion,or the non Islamic
> branches(think of this as a informal question).
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50141 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Fw: [SenatusRomanus] Senate is called to vote!
M. Curiatius Complutensis Tribunus Plebis Senatores Civibusque SPD

This message is to communicate the Senate my objections to this SC because
is in contradiction with our Constitution.

This SC says that ""The Senate may, by Senatus Consultum, create provinciae
for administrative purposes and appoint provincial governors therefor, who
shall bear such titles as the Senate may deem appropriate."

Thus the modification of the title of the governors, who belong to the group
of magistrates provided by the constitution, needs a Lex Centuriata. The
ruling of it by the Senate is therefore unconstitutional.

Added to that on the matter, the current system works well. The only
difference with history is the "propraetor" question, just because we are
not a State sending our officers in our provinces and so, being not able to
develop a pro-magistracies system.

But the term "governor" is appropriate and historic.

Furthermore, modifying this 'governor' title will :

. depreciate the function of current governors, at a time where the
Senate need every good will to have its action relayed in the provinces
because, any way we seize the problem, a "prefect" is generally seen as not
as important as a "governor";
. ask every concerned province an extra work, modifying all the titles
in internal pieces, in edicta, and in web sites. And we must not forget
that, in the provincial hierarchy, there are... "praefecti" and legati,
among others, which will ask us new edicta and the inscription of these new
edicta in all our information support, etc.

The Senate must revoke the SC and summon the Comitia to vote any
modification of the Constitution. In case of not acting this way we, the
Tribuni Plebis, will have the obligation to pronounce intercessio.

Curate ut valeate

M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
PROPRAETOR HISPANIAE
SCRIBA CENSORIS GFBM
NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50142 From: Aulus Liburnius Hadrianus Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
Salvete

Since I consider SAMPA ASCII only a second best, I second the
motion.
We could even maintain an audio repository in MP3 format.
Question, amice Agricola, how do we get there?

Valete Omnes
A. Liburnius

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola"
<wm_hogue@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete
>
> Better in my opinion to move this whole enterprise to the NR Wiki.
> Make an article and use the Talk page to discuss issues. Do
phonology
> in real IPA, not an ASCII variant.
>
> Optime valete
>
> Agricola
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
> <fororom@> wrote:
> >
> > > A. Tullia Scholastica A. Liburnio T. Iulio Sabino quiritibus,
sociis,
> > > peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > A. Liburnius Ti. Iulio omnibusque SPD
> > >
> > > Just to simplify the orthographic cacophony, I would propose
that we
> > > start using the ASCII SAMPA notation system as proposed by the
> > > International Phonetic Alphabet.
> > >
> > > ATS: I seriously doubt that the IPA would survive a trip
> across Yahoo
> > > land, given the extreme difficulty we are having in my online
> Greek course in
> > > getting a simple, supposedly universal, Greek font to arrive in
> legible form.
> > > Moreover, apart from French speakers and scholars of French,
very
> few people
> > > are truly familiar with the IPA...just about every French
textbook
> I have ever
> > > seen has a chart of the IPA, but other language texts seem to
do
> very well
> > > without it, and linguistics texts often use other notation.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > A chart with appropriate
> > > explanations can be found at:
> > >
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAMPA_chart
> > >
> > > The chart indicates where a sound originates in the mouth and
which
> > > sounds are the closest. It is intended for international
usage,
> > > eventhough the chart claims to be English only. I hope it may
help
> > > reduce some of the misunderstandings.
> > >
> > > Tite, as a curiosity, when was the Roman Alphabet introduced in
> > > Romania and how was Latin written in Cyrillic?
> > >
> > > ATS: A little side note: Ti. is the abbreviation for
> Tiberius; T. is
> > > that for Titus, and it is not considered polite to address
persons
> who are not
> > > one¹s family members, etc., by the praenomen alone.
> > >
> > > Vale atque Valete
> > > A. Liburnius
> >
> > Valete.
> > >
> > > -- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "Titus
> > > Iulius Sabinus"
> > > <iulius_sabinus@> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > SALVETE!
> > >> >
> > >> > Using my friend Albucius example I want to present you the
latin
> > >> > pronunciation from my area.
> > >> >
> > >> > So:
> > >> >
> > >> > 1. ce, ci, gi - from: cena, Cicero, frigidus are: cena,
Cicero,
> > >> > frigidus.
> > >> >
> > >> > 2. ti + vowel - from: amicitia is: amicitsia.
> > >> >
> > >> > 3. s, x - from ostium, Sextius are: ostium, Sextius.
> > >> >
> > >> > 4. t + ti + vowel - from Vettius is Vetius.
> > >> >
> > >> > 5. ngu + vowel - from lingua, sanguis are: lingva, sangvis.
> > >> >
> > >> > 6. qu + vowel - from quinque, aqua are: cvincve, acva.
> > >> >
> > >> > 7. ch, ph, th - from chorus, pulcher, philosophus, theatrum
are:
> > >> > horus, pulher, filo:sofus, teatrum.
> > >> >
> > >> > 8. ae, oe - from caelum, poena are: celum, poena.
> > >> >
> > >> > 9. au, eu - from aurum, Europa are: au:rum, Eu:ro:pa.
> > >> >
> > >> > 10. ll, rr, pp - from vallis, ferrum, oppidum are: valis,
ferum,
> > >> > opidum.
> > >> >
> > >> > These are from my son Crassus latin book. What type of
latin is?
> > >> >
> > >> > VALETE,
> > >> > IVL SABINVS
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > >> "Publius Memmius Albucius"
> > >> > <albucius_aoe@> wrote:
> > >>>> > > > 3) French Latin
> > >>> > >
> > >>>> > > > C + E/AE/OE/I = "s"
> > >>> > > Yes.
> > >>> > >
> > >>>> > > > G + E/AE/OE/I = "j" like in French "Jean"
> > >>> > > Most of the times, not not always (sometimes hard G
or Dj)
> > >>> > >
> > >>>> > > > TI + vowel = "si"
> > >>> > > No : "ti" sliding on "tsi"
> > >>> > >
> > >>>> > > > AE, OE = "e" like in "men"
> > >>> > > Yes.
> > >>> > >
> > >>>> > > > U = "ü"
> > >>> > > Most, with exceptions ("ou")
> > >>> > >
> > >>>> > > > And some other particular details like ending -um
is "om"
> > >> > etc...
> > >> >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50143 From: C LeGros Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: creating a prayer?
Alas, I was unable to find a bonafide prayer to Mars Ultor. But I still am
in quite a bind. Though there is no deadline for my assignment, it is
really quite important that I find some sort of prayer to Mars the Avenger.
If it is at all possible could somebody compose a prayer in latin to Mars
Ultor? I'm sorry for being so incessentally needy, I just seem to be having
no luck with the search what so ever.


Valete and thank you so much
Chuck


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50144 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
M. Hortensia A.Liburnio M. Lucretio spd;
what a splendid idea I'm with you both Agricola and
Hadriane, it would be a great thing to have this repository at the
NRwiki.
M. Hortensia Maior
producer 'Vox Romana' podcast
http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/
>
> Salvete
>
> Since I consider SAMPA ASCII only a second best, I second the
> motion.
> We could even maintain an audio repository in MP3 format.
> Question, amice Agricola, how do we get there?
>
> Valete Omnes
> A. Liburnius
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola"
> <wm_hogue@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete
> >
> > Better in my opinion to move this whole enterprise to the NR
Wiki.
> > Make an article and use the Talk page to discuss issues. Do
> phonology
> > in real IPA, not an ASCII variant.
> >
> > Optime valete
> >
> > Agricola
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
> > <fororom@> wrote:
> > >
> > > > A. Tullia Scholastica A. Liburnio T. Iulio Sabino
quiritibus,
> sociis,
> > > > peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > A. Liburnius Ti. Iulio omnibusque SPD
> > > >
> > > > Just to simplify the orthographic cacophony, I would propose
> that we
> > > > start using the ASCII SAMPA notation system as proposed by
the
> > > > International Phonetic Alphabet.
> > > >
> > > > ATS: I seriously doubt that the IPA would survive a trip
> > across Yahoo
> > > > land, given the extreme difficulty we are having in my online
> > Greek course in
> > > > getting a simple, supposedly universal, Greek font to arrive
in
> > legible form.
> > > > Moreover, apart from French speakers and scholars of French,
> very
> > few people
> > > > are truly familiar with the IPA...just about every French
> textbook
> > I have ever
> > > > seen has a chart of the IPA, but other language texts seem
to
> do
> > very well
> > > > without it, and linguistics texts often use other notation.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > A chart with appropriate
> > > > explanations can be found at:
> > > >
> > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAMPA_chart
> > > >
> > > > The chart indicates where a sound originates in the mouth
and
> which
> > > > sounds are the closest. It is intended for international
> usage,
> > > > eventhough the chart claims to be English only. I hope it
may
> help
> > > > reduce some of the misunderstandings.
> > > >
> > > > Tite, as a curiosity, when was the Roman Alphabet introduced
in
> > > > Romania and how was Latin written in Cyrillic?
> > > >
> > > > ATS: A little side note: Ti. is the abbreviation for
> > Tiberius; T. is
> > > > that for Titus, and it is not considered polite to address
> persons
> > who are not
> > > > one¹s family members, etc., by the praenomen alone.
> > > >
> > > > Vale atque Valete
> > > > A. Liburnius
> > >
> > > Valete.
> > > >
> > > > -- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "Titus
> > > > Iulius Sabinus"
> > > > <iulius_sabinus@> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > SALVETE!
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Using my friend Albucius example I want to present you
the
> latin
> > > >> > pronunciation from my area.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > So:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 1. ce, ci, gi - from: cena, Cicero, frigidus are: cena,
> Cicero,
> > > >> > frigidus.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 2. ti + vowel - from: amicitia is: amicitsia.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 3. s, x - from ostium, Sextius are: ostium, Sextius.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 4. t + ti + vowel - from Vettius is Vetius.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 5. ngu + vowel - from lingua, sanguis are: lingva,
sangvis.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 6. qu + vowel - from quinque, aqua are: cvincve, acva.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 7. ch, ph, th - from chorus, pulcher, philosophus,
theatrum
> are:
> > > >> > horus, pulher, filo:sofus, teatrum.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 8. ae, oe - from caelum, poena are: celum, poena.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 9. au, eu - from aurum, Europa are: au:rum, Eu:ro:pa.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 10. ll, rr, pp - from vallis, ferrum, oppidum are: valis,
> ferum,
> > > >> > opidum.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > These are from my son Crassus latin book. What type of
> latin is?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > VALETE,
> > > >> > IVL SABINVS
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > > >> "Publius Memmius Albucius"
> > > >> > <albucius_aoe@> wrote:
> > > >>>> > > > 3) French Latin
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>>> > > > C + E/AE/OE/I = "s"
> > > >>> > > Yes.
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>>> > > > G + E/AE/OE/I = "j" like in French "Jean"
> > > >>> > > Most of the times, not not always (sometimes hard
G
> or Dj)
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>>> > > > TI + vowel = "si"
> > > >>> > > No : "ti" sliding on "tsi"
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>>> > > > AE, OE = "e" like in "men"
> > > >>> > > Yes.
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>>> > > > U = "ü"
> > > >>> > > Most, with exceptions ("ou")
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>>> > > > And some other particular details like ending -um
> is "om"
> > > >> > etc...
> > > >> >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50145 From: svetlozarpetkov Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: ROMAN SILVER FIGURE FOR SALE
Hello group, I am selling this Roman silver figure on eBay:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=012&sspagename=STRK%3AM\
ESE%3AIT&viewitem=&item=220107459616&rd=1&rd=1
<http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=012&sspagename=STRK%3A\
MESE%3AIT&viewitem=&item=220107459616&rd=1&rd=1>
Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

Regards!



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50146 From: Aulus Liburnius Hadrianus Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
A. Liburnio T. Sabino quiritibusque S.P.D.

Thank you for your kind response.

Valete
A. Liburnius

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Iulius Sabinus"
<iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
>
> SALVE ET SALVETE!
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Aulus Liburnius Hadrianus"
> <reenbru@> wrote:
>
> > Tite, as a curiosity, when was the Roman Alphabet introduced in
> Romania>>>
>
> It was used after the roman conquest until the IX - X century and
> reintroduced at the midlle of XVIX.
>
>
> and how was Latin written in Cyrillic? >>>
>
> I'm not accomodate with the subject. But I know your native
language
> importance about the subject.
>
> VALETE,
> IVL SABINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50147 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
Salvete Liburni et Sabine ;
I studied Russian in high school [gymnasium] and university. So I
can read Cyrillic easily. I'm going to the library this week so if you
have some kind of reference book I can tell you.
Maior

> > and how was Latin written in Cyrillic? >>>
> >
> > I'm not accomodate with the subject. But I know your native
> language
> > importance about the subject.
> >
> > VALETE,
> > IVL SABINVS
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50148 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: EX OFFICIO C. EQUITIUS CATO A. TULLIA SCHOLASTICA PRAETORES
Ex officio C. Equitius Cato A Tullia Scholastica praetores

On a.d. III Kal. Maias, Quintus Fabius Maximus issued a petitio
actionis to the praetors of the Republic, to wit:

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"Senator Maximus request [sic] that charge of CALVMNIAE (see below) be
lodged against Senator Quintilianus for the false and misleading
statement:

'But I will NOT vote to replace the old arrogant and incompetent
governor...'

I. Q. Fabius Maximus is not incompetent. He is no more arrogant then
any one else in the Senate.
II. California declined in spite of Q. Fabius Maximus' efforts. The
war in Mesopotamia with the deployment of the armed forces and the
graduations from the Universities where Nova Roma citizens mostly
resided, caused the decline, not any incompetency of Q. Fabius Maximus.

Thus, Q. Fabius Maximus, because of these misleading statements has
had his Dignitas dimensioned [sic - we believe he intended to say
"diminished"] and his Auctoritas reduced.

He demands, as is his right, that Senator Quintilianus be punished for
his statements, and a apology be issued before the Senate to the
Senator, by Senator Quintilianus in order to restore the Senator's
good name."

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This is formal notice that under the terms of the lex Salicia
iudicaria, we are required to accept this petitio and will therefore
be appointing iudices and forming a court to determine the validity of
the actor's claim.

Given under our hands a.d. VI Non. Mai. a.u.c. MMDCCLX L. Arminio
Fausto Ti. Galerio Paulino coss.

Gaius Equitius Cato
Aula Tullia Scholastica
Praetors

N.B. - the lex Salicia iudicaria can be found here:

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lex_Salicia_iudiciaria_%28Nova_Roma%29
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50149 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: EX OFFICIO C. EQUITIUS CATO A. TULLIA SCHOLASTICA PRAETORES
M. Hortensia praetoribus spd;
well, speaking as a lawyer. None of us except those in the
Senate knew of this exchange, until Q. Fabius Maximus started the
suit & the conversation was published here. Maximus broadcast what
he disliked to all & sundry. So if anyone has damaged Maximus'
reputation, it is himself.
Very ironic, since incompetance is at the heart of the
charge of Calumniae.
M. Hortensia Maior



> On a.d. III Kal. Maias, Quintus Fabius Maximus issued a petitio
> actionis to the praetors of the Republic, to wit:
>
>
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+
>
> "Senator Maximus request [sic] that charge of CALVMNIAE (see
below) be
> lodged against Senator Quintilianus for the false and misleading
> statement:
>
> 'But I will NOT vote to replace the old arrogant and incompetent
> governor...'
>
> I. Q. Fabius Maximus is not incompetent. He is no more arrogant
then
> any one else in the Senate.
> II. California declined in spite of Q. Fabius Maximus' efforts.
The
> war in Mesopotamia with the deployment of the armed forces and the
> graduations from the Universities where Nova Roma citizens mostly
> resided, caused the decline, not any incompetency of Q. Fabius
Maximus.
>
> Thus, Q. Fabius Maximus, because of these misleading statements has
> had his Dignitas dimensioned [sic - we believe he intended to say
> "diminished"] and his Auctoritas reduced.
>
> He demands, as is his right, that Senator Quintilianus be punished
for
> his statements, and a apology be issued before the Senate to the
> Senator, by Senator Quintilianus in order to restore the Senator's
> good name."
>
>
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+
>
> This is formal notice that under the terms of the lex Salicia
> iudicaria, we are required to accept this petitio and will
therefore
> be appointing iudices and forming a court to determine the
validity of
> the actor's claim.
>
> Given under our hands a.d. VI Non. Mai. a.u.c. MMDCCLX L. Arminio
> Fausto Ti. Galerio Paulino coss.
>
> Gaius Equitius Cato
> Aula Tullia Scholastica
> Praetors
>
> N.B. - the lex Salicia iudicaria can be found here:
>
> http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lex_Salicia_iudiciaria_%28Nova_Roma%29
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50150 From: Aulus Liburnius Hadrianus Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
Salvete Minor Sabine quiritesque,

Minor, you may try to locate any religious text written in Romanian
between the tenth and the late nineteenth centuries.
Be prepared to possibly find only Greek texts written in Greek.
I suspect that the Romanian Ortohodox Church became autocephalic
only after Romania achieved independence in the late nineteenth
century. I don't know that for a fact, hence my question.

Valete
A. LIBVRNIVS
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Liburni et Sabine ;
> I studied Russian in high school [gymnasium] and university.
So I
> can read Cyrillic easily. I'm going to the library this week so if
you
> have some kind of reference book I can tell you.
> Maior
>
> > > and how was Latin written in Cyrillic? >>>
> > >
> > > I'm not accomodate with the subject. But I know your native
> > language
> > > importance about the subject.
> > >
> > > VALETE,
> > > IVL SABINVS
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50151 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: EX OFFICIO C. EQVITI CATONIS A. TVLLIAE SCHOLASTICAE PRAETORVM
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica praetrix M. Hortensiae Maiori quiritbus S.P.D.
>
>
> M. Hortensia praetoribus spd;
> well, speaking as a lawyer. None of us except those in the
> Senate knew of this exchange, until Q. Fabius Maximus started the
> suit & the conversation was published here.
>
>
> ATS: Although the Senate list is restricted, it is an official list of
> Nova Roma, and we felt that we had no choice but to accept this petitio as it
> did not meet any of the qualifications for dismissal under the Lex Salicia
> Iudiciaria. I would have preferred not to publish the entire conversation
> here, and would appreciate a bit of a clarification to the Lex Iudiciaria as
> to whether the petitio must be separate from the editio, but we must now
> address other issues.
>
> The next step is that an index iudicum must be prepared by the relevant
> parties, and the procedure of whittling down the candidates for NR jury duty
> begun. Quod fiat, fiat.
>
> Maximus broadcast what
> he disliked to all & sundry. So if anyone has damaged Maximus'
> reputation, it is himself.
> Very ironic, since incompetance is at the heart of the
> charge of Calumniae.
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
>
> Valete.
>
>> > On a.d. III Kal. Maias, Quintus Fabius Maximus issued a petitio
>> > actionis to the praetors of the Republic, to wit:
>> >
>> >
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> +
>> >
>> > "Senator Maximus request [sic] that charge of CALVMNIAE (see
> below) be
>> > lodged against Senator Quintilianus for the false and misleading
>> > statement:
>> >
>> > 'But I will NOT vote to replace the old arrogant and incompetent
>> > governor...'
>> >
>> > I. Q. Fabius Maximus is not incompetent. He is no more arrogant
> then
>> > any one else in the Senate.
>> > II. California declined in spite of Q. Fabius Maximus' efforts.
> The
>> > war in Mesopotamia with the deployment of the armed forces and the
>> > graduations from the Universities where Nova Roma citizens mostly
>> > resided, caused the decline, not any incompetency of Q. Fabius
> Maximus.
>> >
>> > Thus, Q. Fabius Maximus, because of these misleading statements has
>> > had his Dignitas dimensioned [sic - we believe he intended to say
>> > "diminished"] and his Auctoritas reduced.
>> >
>> > He demands, as is his right, that Senator Quintilianus be punished
> for
>> > his statements, and a apology be issued before the Senate to the
>> > Senator, by Senator Quintilianus in order to restore the Senator's
>> > good name."
>> >
>> >
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> +
>> >
>> > This is formal notice that under the terms of the lex Salicia
>> > iudicaria, we are required to accept this petitio and will
> therefore
>> > be appointing iudices and forming a court to determine the
> validity of
>> > the actor's claim.
>> >
>> > Given under our hands a.d. VI Non. Mai. a.u.c. MMDCCLX L. Arminio
>> > Fausto Ti. Galerio Paulino coss.
>> >
>> > Gaius Equitius Cato
>> > Aula Tullia Scholastica
>> > Praetors
>> >
>> > N.B. - the lex Salicia iudicaria can be found here:
>> >
>> > http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lex_Salicia_iudiciaria_%28Nova_Roma%29
>> >




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50152 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: ATTN Cybernautae: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
> A. Tullia Scholastica A. Liburnio quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae
> voluntatis, praesertim cybernautis, S.P.D.
>
> This raises an interesting question: is it possible to get sound files
> either on the wiki or the ML? I know we have them on Latinitas and various
> other lists, and I also know that my net connection does not allow me to send
> sound files directly, but could send a CD to Marinus or some other cybernaut
> moderator who does not live terribly far away IF we could upload such useful
> items. The pronunciation of Latin is important to many on this list as well
> as on Latinitas, and it would be nice if we could get Avitus, Lentulus, yours
> truly, etc., to read some passages and file them there for everyone¹s
> assistance.
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>
>
> Salvete
>
> Since I consider SAMPA ASCII only a second best, I second the
> motion.
> We could even maintain an audio repository in MP3 format.
> Question, amice Agricola, how do we get there?
>
> Valete Omnes
> A. Liburnius
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "M.
> Lucretius Agricola"
> <wm_hogue@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Salvete
>> >
>> > Better in my opinion to move this whole enterprise to the NR Wiki.
>> > Make an article and use the Talk page to discuss issues. Do
> phonology
>> > in real IPA, not an ASCII variant.
>> >
>> > Optime valete
>> >
>> > Agricola
>> >
>> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "A.
>> Tullia Scholastica"
>> > <fororom@> wrote:
>>> > >
>>>> > > > A. Tullia Scholastica A. Liburnio T. Iulio Sabino quiritibus,
> sociis,
>>>> > > > peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > A. Liburnius Ti. Iulio omnibusque SPD
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Just to simplify the orthographic cacophony, I would propose
> that we
>>>> > > > start using the ASCII SAMPA notation system as proposed by the
>>>> > > > International Phonetic Alphabet.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > ATS: I seriously doubt that the IPA would survive a trip
>> > across Yahoo
>>>> > > > land, given the extreme difficulty we are having in my online
>> > Greek course in
>>>> > > > getting a simple, supposedly universal, Greek font to arrive in
>> > legible form.
>>>> > > > Moreover, apart from French speakers and scholars of French,
> very
>> > few people
>>>> > > > are truly familiar with the IPA...just about every French
> textbook
>> > I have ever
>>>> > > > seen has a chart of the IPA, but other language texts seem to
> do
>> > very well
>>>> > > > without it, and linguistics texts often use other notation.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > A chart with appropriate
>>>> > > > explanations can be found at:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAMPA_chart
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > The chart indicates where a sound originates in the mouth and
> which
>>>> > > > sounds are the closest. It is intended for international
> usage,
>>>> > > > eventhough the chart claims to be English only. I hope it may
> help
>>>> > > > reduce some of the misunderstandings.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Tite, as a curiosity, when was the Roman Alphabet introduced in
>>>> > > > Romania and how was Latin written in Cyrillic?
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > ATS: A little side note: Ti. is the abbreviation for
>> > Tiberius; T. is
>>>> > > > that for Titus, and it is not considered polite to address
> persons
>> > who are not
>>>> > > > one¹s family members, etc., by the praenomen alone.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Vale atque Valete
>>>> > > > A. Liburnius
>>> > >
>>> > > Valete.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > -- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
>> > <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "Titus
>>>> > > > Iulius Sabinus"
>>>> > > > <iulius_sabinus@> wrote:
>>>>>> > > >> >
>>>>>> > > >> > SALVETE!
>>>>>> > > >> >
>>>>>> > > >> > Using my friend Albucius example I want to present you the
> latin
>>>>>> > > >> > pronunciation from my area.
>>>>>> > > >> >
>>>>>> > > >> > So:
>>>>>> > > >> >
>>>>>> > > >> > 1. ce, ci, gi - from: cena, Cicero, frigidus are: cena,
> Cicero,
>>>>>> > > >> > frigidus.
>>>>>> > > >> >
>>>>>> > > >> > 2. ti + vowel - from: amicitia is: amicitsia.
>>>>>> > > >> >
>>>>>> > > >> > 3. s, x - from ostium, Sextius are: ostium, Sextius.
>>>>>> > > >> >
>>>>>> > > >> > 4. t + ti + vowel - from Vettius is Vetius.
>>>>>> > > >> >
>>>>>> > > >> > 5. ngu + vowel - from lingua, sanguis are: lingva, sangvis.
>>>>>> > > >> >
>>>>>> > > >> > 6. qu + vowel - from quinque, aqua are: cvincve, acva.
>>>>>> > > >> >
>>>>>> > > >> > 7. ch, ph, th - from chorus, pulcher, philosophus, theatrum
> are:
>>>>>> > > >> > horus, pulher, filo:sofus, teatrum.
>>>>>> > > >> >
>>>>>> > > >> > 8. ae, oe - from caelum, poena are: celum, poena.
>>>>>> > > >> >
>>>>>> > > >> > 9. au, eu - from aurum, Europa are: au:rum, Eu:ro:pa.
>>>>>> > > >> >
>>>>>> > > >> > 10. ll, rr, pp - from vallis, ferrum, oppidum are: valis,
> ferum,
>>>>>> > > >> > opidum.
>>>>>> > > >> >
>>>>>> > > >> > These are from my son Crassus latin book. What type of
> latin is?
>>>>>> > > >> >
>>>>>> > > >> > VALETE,
>>>>>> > > >> > IVL SABINVS
>>>>>> > > >> >
>>>>>> > > >> >
>>>>>> > > >> >
>>>>>> > > >> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>>>>>> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
>> > <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ,
>>>>> > > >> "Publius Memmius Albucius"
>>>>>> > > >> > <albucius_aoe@> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>> > > > 3) French Latin
>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >
>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>> > > > C + E/AE/OE/I = "s"
>>>>>>>> > > >>> > > Yes.
>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >
>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>> > > > G + E/AE/OE/I = "j" like in French "Jean"
>>>>>>>> > > >>> > > Most of the times, not not always (sometimes hard G
> or Dj)
>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >
>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>> > > > TI + vowel = "si"
>>>>>>>> > > >>> > > No : "ti" sliding on "tsi"
>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >
>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>> > > > AE, OE = "e" like in "men"
>>>>>>>> > > >>> > > Yes.
>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >
>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>> > > > U = "ü"
>>>>>>>> > > >>> > > Most, with exceptions ("ou")
>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >
>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>> > > > And some other particular details like ending -um
> is "om"
>>>>>> > > >> > etc...
>>>>>> > > >> >



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50153 From: Aulus Liburnius Hadrianus Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
Salvete Minor Sabine quiritesque,

Minor, you may try to locate any religious text written in Romanian
between the tenth and the late nineteenth centuries.
Be prepared to possibly find only Greek texts written in Greek.
I suspect that the Romanian Ortohodox Church became autocephalic
only after Romania achieved independence in the late nineteenth
century. I don't know that for a fact, hence my question.

Valete
A. LIBVRNIVS
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Liburni et Sabine ;
> I studied Russian in high school [gymnasium] and university.
So I
> can read Cyrillic easily. I'm going to the library this week so if
you
> have some kind of reference book I can tell you.
> Maior
>
> > > and how was Latin written in Cyrillic? >>>
> > >
> > > I'm not accomodate with the subject. But I know your native
> > language
> > > importance about the subject.
> > >
> > > VALETE,
> > > IVL SABINVS
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50154 From: ExLngHrn@aol.com Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: EX OFFICIO C. EQUITIUS CATO A. TULLIA SCHOLASTICA PRAETORES
Maior:

You're a lawyer in the macro-world? Me too, for what it's worth...

-Wes

In a message dated 5/2/2007 6:07:47 PM Central Daylight Time,
rory12001@... writes:




M. Hortensia praetoribus spd;
well, speaking as a lawyer. None of us except those in the
Senate knew of this exchange, until Q. Fabius Maximus started the
suit & the conversation was published here. Maximus broadcast what
he disliked to all & sundry. So if anyone has damaged Maximus'
reputation, it is himself.
Very ironic, since incompetance is at the heart of the
charge of Calumniae.
M. Hortensia Maior

> On a.d. III Kal. Maias, Quintus Fabius Maximus issued a petitio
> actionis to the praetors of the Republic, to wit:
>
>
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+
>
> "Senator Maximus request [sic] that charge of CALVMNIAE (see
below) be
> lodged against Senator Quintilianus for the false and misleading
> statement:
>
> 'But I will NOT vote to replace the old arrogant and incompetent
> governor...'
>
> I. Q. Fabius Maximus is not incompetent. He is no more arrogant
then
> any one else in the Senate.
> II. California declined in spite of Q. Fabius Maximus' efforts.
The
> war in Mesopotamia with the deployment of the armed forces and the
> graduations from the Universities where Nova Roma citizens mostly
> resided, caused the decline, not any incompetency of Q. Fabius
Maximus.
>
> Thus, Q. Fabius Maximus, because of these misleading statements has
> had his Dignitas dimensioned [sic - we believe he intended to say
> "diminished" "diminished"<WBR>] and his Auctor
>
> He demands, as is his right, that Senator Quintilianus be punished
for
> his statements, and a apology be issued before the Senate to the
> Senator, by Senator Quintilianus in order to restore the Senator's
> good name."
>
>
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+
>
> This is formal notice that under the terms of the lex Salicia
> iudicaria, we are required to accept this petitio and will
therefore
> be appointing iudices and forming a court to determine the
validity of
> the actor's claim.
>
> Given under our hands a.d. VI Non. Mai. a.u.c. MMDCCLX L. Arminio
> Fausto Ti. Galerio Paulino coss.
>
> Gaius Equitius Cato
> Aula Tullia Scholastica
> Praetors
>
> N.B. - the lex Salicia iudicaria can be found here:
>
> _http://www.novaromahttp://www.nhttp://www.novarhttp://www.http://_
(http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lex_Salicia_iudiciaria_(Nova_Roma))
>









************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50155 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-05-02
Subject: Re: ATTN Cybernautae: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
Salve Aula Tullia,

"A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> writes:

> is it possible to get sound files either on the wiki or the ML?

I don't know how Marcus Octavius would feel about archiving them on the
website. They take up a lot of space, and he's paying for it. We could keep
some mp3 files in the files section of the Nova-Roma list, but it would count
against our total size allocation, which means the oldest posts would be
disappearing more quickly. We've already lost over 5000 of the earliest
posts to this mailing list, and we lose more every day as new posts come in.

> I know we have them on Latinitas

Yes, we do. I think the files section there is probably the best place for
them for now. Latinitas has at this point only used 12% of its allocated
space.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50156 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
Salvete Liburni et Sabine;
hmm, it has been difficult. The Romanian church became independent
in 1885'ish. But the liturgy was Slavonic.
So far I found 'Catehismul Lui Coresi -Fragmentul Todorescu-' in
a series 'Institutul de Linguistica din Bucuresti' "Texte romaesti
din secolul al XVI-lea/ 1982.
It seems the Latin alphabet was introduced in the 16th century,
the above catechism is Lutheran and seemingly in Romanian not Latin.
Sabine might know more.
I then found 'La romanite du roumain: Alexandru Graur
"Latinets oden i oster" Alf Lombard
but they don't look like they would have Latin language texts..
We have the big Institute of Linguistics of Bucharest series. I'll
send you a note, offline so you can scan the archive.
Maior


> Minor, you may try to locate any religious text written in
Romanian
> between the tenth and the late nineteenth centuries.
> Be prepared to possibly find only Greek texts written in Greek.
> I suspect that the Romanian Ortohodox Church became autocephalic
> only after Romania achieved independence in the late nineteenth
> century. I don't know that for a fact, hence my question.
>
> Valete
> A. LIBVRNIVS
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete Liburni et Sabine ;
> > I studied Russian in high school [gymnasium] and university.
> So I
> > can read Cyrillic easily. I'm going to the library this week so
if
> you
> > have some kind of reference book I can tell you.
> > Maior
> >
> > > > and how was Latin written in Cyrillic? >>>
> > > >
> > > > I'm not accomodate with the subject. But I know your native
> > > language
> > > > importance about the subject.
> > > >
> > > > VALETE,
> > > > IVL SABINVS
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50157 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: EX OFFICIO C. EQUITIUS CATO A. TULLIA SCHOLASTICA PRAETORES
Salve Wes;
I was..& gave it up to write mystery novels & sci-fi/fantasy;-)
but I love Roman law & check my name out: 'Hortensia' the daughter
of great Hortensius, the lawyer, hmm maybe you should join Nova Roma
& my gens, we need more lawyers in Gens Hortensia!!:)
Hortensia Maior

Maior:
>
> You're a lawyer in the macro-world? Me too, for what it's
worth...
>
> -Wes
>
> In a message dated 5/2/2007 6:07:47 PM Central Daylight Time,
> rory12001@... writes:
>
>
>
>
> M. Hortensia praetoribus spd;
> well, speaking as a lawyer. None of us except those in the
> Senate knew of this exchange, until Q. Fabius Maximus started the
> suit & the conversation was published here. Maximus broadcast
what
> he disliked to all & sundry. So if anyone has damaged Maximus'
> reputation, it is himself.
> Very ironic, since incompetance is at the heart of the
> charge of Calumniae.
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
> > On a.d. III Kal. Maias, Quintus Fabius Maximus issued a petitio
> > actionis to the praetors of the Republic, to wit:
> >
> >
>
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> +
> >
> > "Senator Maximus request [sic] that charge of CALVMNIAE (see
> below) be
> > lodged against Senator Quintilianus for the false and misleading
> > statement:
> >
> > 'But I will NOT vote to replace the old arrogant and incompetent
> > governor...'
> >
> > I. Q. Fabius Maximus is not incompetent. He is no more arrogant
> then
> > any one else in the Senate.
> > II. California declined in spite of Q. Fabius Maximus' efforts.
> The
> > war in Mesopotamia with the deployment of the armed forces and
the
> > graduations from the Universities where Nova Roma citizens
mostly
> > resided, caused the decline, not any incompetency of Q. Fabius
> Maximus.
> >
> > Thus, Q. Fabius Maximus, because of these misleading statements
has
> > had his Dignitas dimensioned [sic - we believe he intended to
say
> > "diminished" "diminished"<WBR>] and his Auctor
> >
> > He demands, as is his right, that Senator Quintilianus be
punished
> for
> > his statements, and a apology be issued before the Senate to the
> > Senator, by Senator Quintilianus in order to restore the
Senator's
> > good name."
> >
> >
>
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> +
> >
> > This is formal notice that under the terms of the lex Salicia
> > iudicaria, we are required to accept this petitio and will
> therefore
> > be appointing iudices and forming a court to determine the
> validity of
> > the actor's claim.
> >
> > Given under our hands a.d. VI Non. Mai. a.u.c. MMDCCLX L.
Arminio
> > Fausto Ti. Galerio Paulino coss.
> >
> > Gaius Equitius Cato
> > Aula Tullia Scholastica
> > Praetors
> >
> > N.B. - the lex Salicia iudicaria can be found here:
> >
> >
_http://www.novaromahttp://www.nhttp://www.novarhttp://www.http://_
> (http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lex_Salicia_iudiciaria_(Nova_Roma))
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's free at
http://www.aol.com
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50158 From: ExLngHrn@aol.com Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: EX OFFICIO C. EQUITIUS CATO A. TULLIA SCHOLASTICA PRAETORES
Mind if I IM or email you off-list?

-Wes

In a message dated 5/3/2007 1:31:36 AM Central Daylight Time,
rory12001@... writes:




Salve Wes;
I was..& gave it up to write mystery novels & sci-fi/fantasy;
but I love Roman law & check my name out: 'Hortensia' the daughter
of great Hortensius, the lawyer, hmm maybe you should join Nova Roma
& my gens, we need more lawyers in Gens Hortensia!!:
Hortensia Maior

Maior:
>
> You're a lawyer in the macro-world? Me too, for what it's
worth...
>
> -Wes
>
> In a message dated 5/2/2007 6:07:47 PM Central Daylight Time,
> rory12001@.. rory1200
>
>
>
>
> M. Hortensia praetoribus spd;
> well, speaking as a lawyer. None of us except those in the
> Senate knew of this exchange, until Q. Fabius Maximus started the
> suit & the conversation was published here. Maximus broadcast
what
> he disliked to all & sundry. So if anyone has damaged Maximus'
> reputation, it is himself.
> Very ironic, since incompetance is at the heart of the
> charge of Calumniae.
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
> > On a.d. III Kal. Maias, Quintus Fabius Maximus issued a petitio
> > actionis to the praetors of the Republic, to wit:
> >
> >
>
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> +
> >
> > "Senator Maximus request [sic] that charge of CALVMNIAE (see
> below) be
> > lodged against Senator Quintilianus for the false and misleading
> > statement:
> >
> > 'But I will NOT vote to replace the old arrogant and incompetent
> > governor...'
> >
> > I. Q. Fabius Maximus is not incompetent. He is no more arrogant
> then
> > any one else in the Senate.
> > II. California declined in spite of Q. Fabius Maximus' efforts.
> The
> > war in Mesopotamia with the deployment of the armed forces and
the
> > graduations from the Universities where Nova Roma citizens
mostly
> > resided, caused the decline, not any incompetency of Q. Fabius
> Maximus.
> >
> > Thus, Q. Fabius Maximus, because of these misleading statements
has
> > had his Dignitas dimensioned [sic - we believe he intended to
say
> > "diminished" "diminished"<WBR>] and his Auctor
> >
> > He demands, as is his right, that Senator Quintilianus be
punished
> for
> > his statements, and a apology be issued before the Senate to the
> > Senator, by Senator Quintilianus in order to restore the
Senator's
> > good name."
> >
> >
>
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> +
> >
> > This is formal notice that under the terms of the lex Salicia
> > iudicaria, we are required to accept this petitio and will
> therefore
> > be appointing iudices and forming a court to determine the
> validity of
> > the actor's claim.
> >
> > Given under our hands a.d. VI Non. Mai. a.u.c. MMDCCLX L.
Arminio
> > Fausto Ti. Galerio Paulino coss.
> >
> > Gaius Equitius Cato
> > Aula Tullia Scholastica
> > Praetors
> >
> > N.B. - the lex Salicia iudicaria can be found here:
> >
> >
__http://www.novaromahttp://www.http://www.nhttp://wwwhttp://www.htt_
(http://www.novaromahttp//www.nhttp://www.novarhttp://www.http://_)
> (_http://www.novaromahttp://www.nhttp://www.novarhtt_
(http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lex_Salicia_iudiciaria_) (Nova_Roma))
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ************ **** **** ************<WBR>*********
_http://www.aol.http_ (http://www.aol.com./)
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>









************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50159 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: EX OFFICIO C. EQUITIUS CATO A. TULLIA SCHOLASTICA PRAETORES
M. Hortensiae s.d.

My impression of slander and libel in American law has been that they're very difficult to
prove, as one must show that the offending party KNOWINGLY spoke or wrote something
falesly defamatory about the victim. Is that true? Is there a similar standard in our law?
For that matter, how can someone show in court that value judgements so subjective as
incompetency and arrogance are false? Can someone really be punished for slander/libel
merely for stating an honest opinion about the character of another? It's not as though
Quintilianus claimed that Maximus is a bankrobber or a traitor.

I urge my fellow Californianus to drop this matter. Let your dignitas stand for itself,
Quinte Maxime. If it is truly strong, the claims of no one may harm it.

Vale,
L. Iunius Bassus
Magister Sodalitatis Latinitatis

Ex Lege Salicia poenalis :
"14. CALVMNIAE (Libel and Slander):
Whoever is proven to have made to a third party a false and defamatory statement about a
person which has damaged the dignity or reputation of that person may be compelled to
make a DECLARATIO PVBLICA: the convicted reus shall then present a public retraction and
apology in order to restore the actor's dignity and reputation in one of Nova Roma's
official venues within thirty days of the official announcement of the sentence.
The convicted reus may be placed under moderation on Nova Roma's official
communications venues for a maximum period of six months. The messages of a citizen
under moderation may be censored; in those cases, the praetores shall publicly announce
the censoring of the message, and shall provide the original message upon request to
those magistrates entitled to use intercessio against the praetores' decision within twenty-
four (24) hours of their announcement."

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia praetoribus spd;
> well, speaking as a lawyer. None of us except those in the
> Senate knew of this exchange, until Q. Fabius Maximus started the
> suit & the conversation was published here. Maximus broadcast what
> he disliked to all & sundry. So if anyone has damaged Maximus'
> reputation, it is himself.
> Very ironic, since incompetance is at the heart of the
> charge of Calumniae.
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
>
>
> > On a.d. III Kal. Maias, Quintus Fabius Maximus issued a petitio
> > actionis to the praetors of the Republic, to wit:
> >
> >
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++
> +
> >
> > "Senator Maximus request [sic] that charge of CALVMNIAE (see
> below) be
> > lodged against Senator Quintilianus for the false and misleading
> > statement:
> >
> > 'But I will NOT vote to replace the old arrogant and incompetent
> > governor...'
> >
> > I. Q. Fabius Maximus is not incompetent. He is no more arrogant
> then
> > any one else in the Senate.
> > II. California declined in spite of Q. Fabius Maximus' efforts.
> The
> > war in Mesopotamia with the deployment of the armed forces and the
> > graduations from the Universities where Nova Roma citizens mostly
> > resided, caused the decline, not any incompetency of Q. Fabius
> Maximus.
> >
> > Thus, Q. Fabius Maximus, because of these misleading statements has
> > had his Dignitas dimensioned [sic - we believe he intended to say
> > "diminished"] and his Auctoritas reduced.
> >
> > He demands, as is his right, that Senator Quintilianus be punished
> for
> > his statements, and a apology be issued before the Senate to the
> > Senator, by Senator Quintilianus in order to restore the Senator's
> > good name."
> >
> >
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++
> +
> >
> > This is formal notice that under the terms of the lex Salicia
> > iudicaria, we are required to accept this petitio and will
> therefore
> > be appointing iudices and forming a court to determine the
> validity of
> > the actor's claim.
> >
> > Given under our hands a.d. VI Non. Mai. a.u.c. MMDCCLX L. Arminio
> > Fausto Ti. Galerio Paulino coss.
> >
> > Gaius Equitius Cato
> > Aula Tullia Scholastica
> > Praetors
> >
> > N.B. - the lex Salicia iudicaria can be found here:
> >
> > http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lex_Salicia_iudiciaria_%28Nova_Roma%29
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50160 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: a.d. V Non. Mai.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem V Nonas Maius; haec dies fastus est.

"In less than four nights, Chiron, the semi-human
Joined to the body of a tawny horse, reveals his stars.
Pelion is a mountain facing south in Haemonian Thessaly:
The summit's green with pines, the rest is oak.
Chiron, Philyra's son, lived there. An ancient rocky cave
Remains, inhabited once, they say, by that honest old one.
He's thought to have exercised those hands, that one day
Sent Hector to his death, in playing on the lyre.
Hercules visited him, most of his labours done,
Only the last few tasks remaining for the hero.
You could have viewed Troy's twin fates, together:
One the young scion of Aeacus, the other Jove's son.
Chiron received young Hercules hospitably,
And asked him the reason for his being there.
He replied, as Chiron viewed his club and lion-skin, saying:
`The man is worthy of these weapons, the weapons of the man!'
Nor could Achilles, daringly, restrain his hands,
From touching that pelt shaggy with bristles.
While the old one handled the arrows, encrusted with poison,
A shaft fell from the quiver and lodged in his left foot.
Chiron groaned, and drew its blade from his body:
Hercules, and the Thessalian youth groaned too.
Though the Centaur himself mixed herbs culled
From Pagasean hills, treating the wound with ointments,
The gnawing venom defied his remedies, and its evil
Penetrated his body, to the marrow of his bones.
The blood of the Lernean Hydra fused with
The Centaur's blood, giving no chance for aid.
Achilles, drenched in tears, stood before him as before
A father, just as he would have wept for Peleus dying.
Often he caressed the feeble fingers with loving hands,
(The teacher had his reward for the character he'd formed),
And he kissed him, often, and often, as he lay there, cried:
`Live, I beg you: don't leave me, dear father!'
The ninth day came, and you, virtuous Chiron,
Wrapped your body in those fourteen stars." - Ovid, Fasti V

"The author of the War of the Gigantomakhai says that Kronos took the
shape of a horse and lay with Philyra, the daughter of Okeanos.
Through this cause Kheiron was born a kentauros: his wife was
Khariklo." - Homerica, Titanomachia Fragment 6 (from Scholiast on
Apollonius Rhodius 1.554)

"Peloreus took up Pelion with hightowering peak as a missile in his
innumberable arms, and left the cave Philyre bare: as the rocky roof
of his cave was pulled off, old Kheiron quivered and shook, that
figure of half a man growing into a comrade horse." - Nonnus,
Dionysiaca 48.77

"By nightfall they [the Argonauts] were passing the Isle of Philyra
[at the eastern end of the southern Black Sea coast]. This was where
Kronos son of Ouranos, deceiving his consort Rhea, lay with Philyra
daughter of Okeanos in the days when he ruled the Titanes in Olympos
and Zeus was still a child, tended in the Kretan cave by the Kouretes
of Ida. But Kronos and Philyra were surprised in the very act by the
goddess Rhea. Whereupon Kronos leapt out of bed and galloped off in
the form of a long-maned stallion, while Philyra in her shame left the
place, deserting her old haunts, and came to the long Pelasgian
ridges. There she gave birth to the monstrous Kheiron, half horse and
half divine, the offspring of a lover in questionable shape." -
Apollonius Rhodius, Argonautica 2.1231

"When Saturnus was hunting Jove throughout the earth, assuming the
form of a steed he lay with Philyra, daughter of Oceanus. By him she
bore Chiron the Centaur, who is said to have been the first to invent
the art of healing. After Philyra saw that she had borne a strange
species, she asked Jove to changed her into another form, and she was
transformed into the tree which is called the linden." - Hyginus,
Fabulae 138

"There is a Kentauros with only two of his legs those of a horse; his
forelegs are human. Next come two-horse chariots with women standing
in them. The horses have golden wings, and a man is giving armour to
one of the women. I conjecture that this scene refers to the death of
Patroklos; the women in the chariots, I take it, are Nereides, and
Thetis is receiving the armour from Hephaistos. And moreover, he who
is giving the armour is not strong upon his feet, and a slave follows
him behind, holding a pair of fire-tongs. An account also is given of
the Kentauros, that he is Khiron, freed by this time from human
affairs and held worthy to share the home of the gods, who has come to
assuage the grief of Akhilleus." - Pausanias, Guide to Greece 5.19.8-9

"Herakles turned back the Kentauroi with a volley of fire-brands; he
sent arrows after the others and chased them as far as Malea. There
they took refuge with Kheiron, who, after the Lapiths had driven him
from Mount Pelion, settled on Malea. Herakles let loose an arrow at
the kentaroi as they huddled round Kheiron, which penetrated the arm
of Elatos and landed in Kheiron's knee. In horror Herakles ran to him,
pulled out the arrow and dressed the wound with a salve that Kheiron
handed him. The festering wound was incurable, however, and Kheiron
moved into his cave, where he yearned for death, but could not die
because he was immortal. Prometheus thereupon proposed Herakles to
Zeus, to become immortal in place of Kheiron: and so Kheiron died." -
Apollodorus, The Library 2.83-87

Kheiron (Chiron) was the eldest and wisest of the half-horse, half-man
Kentauroi but unlike the rest of the tribe he was an immortal rustic
god, a son of the Titan Kronos and a half-brother of Zeus. Kheiron
dwelt in a cave on Mount Pelion in Thessalia where he raised and
mentored many of the great heroes, including Jason, Peleus, Asklepios,
Aristaios and Akhilleus. He was once accidentally wounded by Herakles
with a Hydra-venom-coated arrow and unable to endure the pain
voluntarily relinquished his immortality and died. In recompense he
was given a place amongst the stars of heaven as the Constellation
Saggitarius, or some say Centaurus. Kheiron was usually depicted with
the full body of a man, from head to foot, robed and booted, with a
horse's body attached behind. This contrasted with the other Kentauroi
who were depicted without robes, and as fully equine below the waist.
According to some, he had two marine brothers, the Ikhthyokentauroi.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Homerica, Nonnus, Apollodorus Rhodius, Pausanius, Apollodorus,
Chiron (http://theoi.com/Georgikos/KentaurosKheiron.html)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50161 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: Latin pronunciation (Accent VS. Pronunciation)
Lentulus: Tulliae suae: salutem dicit:


>>> LENT.: "And this was so strong, firm and strictly conserved that from the 1st century BC to the 4th century BC
>
> ATS: Lentule, amice, do you perhaps mean from the 1st century BC
to the 4th century AD/CE? Your other comments seem to indicate this. <<<


Yes of course, I made a typo. :-)

Vale!



---------------------------------

---------------------------------
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50162 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: returnee seeks to assist us...
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus rogator et propraetor Pannoniae Fl. Claudio Aurelio sal.:


>>> After a gap of at least two years, I have decided to return to Nova
Roma. >>>


You are very wellcome in the New Rome! The prodigal sone has returned! :-) (Just a joke.) :-)


>>> I am able to write competently in Latin (Classical and
Ecclesiastical), Ancient Greek, and Modern Greek. >>>>


Then you have to join our Sodalitas Latinitatis! Nova Roma need very much more and more Latinists. Our long-term final goal is to build Latin speaker modern Roman community.


>>>> There are also certain caveats. I am a seminarian of the Greek
Orthodox Church, and hence cannot under any circumstances take a part
in Pagan rituals. >>>


And I am a Roman Catholic and also practice the ancient Roman religion. I can reconciliate them with my special ideology I call Harmonizm.


Cura ut valeas fideliter in Deo omnipotenti!


---------------------------------

---------------------------------
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50163 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Report of the Senate Session
M. Curiatius Complutensis Tribunus Plebis omnes civibus Novae Romae SPD

SENATE VOTING RESULTS

The Senate was called to discuss the following proposed Agenda by the Consul Galerius Paulinus :

Item I The US State of Nevada is separated in to its own province.

The new province shall be called Nivosa

Item II Appointment of a Propraetor of California ( CA and HI)

Marcus Martianus Gangalius is appointed Praetor of California

Item III

L. Iunius Bassus is appointed Praetor of California

Item IV

The Province of Mediatlantica is reconfigured as follows

Province of Mediatlantica will consist of the following
US States

Maryland
Delaware
Washington, DC
Virginia

Province of Nova Eborica will consist of
New York State

Province of Pennsylvania
will consist of the US Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Item IV Discussion

Senator Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus has made a suggestion that I believe has merit and one I support. That of making the election officials appointed and not elected.

Question:

Does the Senate believe that the it would be advisable to have the diribitors' and the custodes as appointed officers instead of as elected officials.

The idea is to have them nominated by the Consuls for staggered terms of two years, approved by the Senate and under the supervision of the Censores.

Item Annual Senatorial fee

The Senate being the supreme policy-making authority for Nova Roma and serving as the repository of experience and wisdom in the affairs of State, the Senate sets an annual fee on the members of the Senate in the amount of _______. We do this to set the example for other Nova Romans to follow and to insure a minimum income for the state. The Senatorial fee is on top of any taxes imposed on all citizens or paid by a member of the Senate..

Failure to pay the Annual Senatorial fee shall result in ___________________
=================================================================================================
After the discussion in the Senate of the Agenda proposed by the Consul Paulinus the items I and IV were withdrawn, the Consul is of the opinion that "we need to reduce the size of our administrative areas to the size of a city but it is not an issue that can not wait further consultations".

Therefore only two items remain for a vote:

Item II Appointment of a Praetor of California
Marcus Martianus Gangalius is appointed Praetor of California

Item III Appointment of a Praetor of California
L. Iunius Bassus is appointed Praetor of California
=================================================================================================

The Senate was call to vote with the following message of Consul:
"I am convening the Senate on a.d. VIII Kal. Mai (April 24 2760 AU.C) when the contio will commence until a.d. IV Kal. Mai. ( April 28, 2760 A.U.C.) when it will end. Voting will then commence and will end on pr. Kal. Mai. (April 30, 2760 A.U.C) . Once debate has concluded Senators will send their votes to the Senate list where the results will be tabulated and the Tribunes will report the results to the people of Nova Roma in accordance with our laws and customs. I will post an agenda after my colleague has had some time to weigh in on the draft."

The session was closed at the 11,59 PM Central European Summer Time (5:59pm EST)
==================================================================================================

Here is the list of the voting Senators:

TGP>Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
GEM> Gn. Equitius Marinus
GPL> G. Popilius Laenas
PMS> Pompeia Minucia Strabo
GFBM> Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
TOPA> Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus
MOG> Marcus Octavius Gracchus
CFBQ> Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
QSP>Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
CEC> C. Equitius Cato
MMPH> M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
LAF> L. Arminius Faustus
LECA> L. Equitius Cincinnatus Augur
CFD> Caius Flavius Diocletianus
CL> C. Livia
QFM> Q. Fabius Maximus
ATMC> Appius Tullius Marcellus Cato
ATS> A. Tullia Scholastica
DIPI> Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus
MBA> Marcus Bianchius Antonius
GSA> Gn Salvius Astur
SAS> Sextus Apollonius Scipio
CCS> C Curius Saturninus
FAC> Fr Apulus Caesar
JSM> Julilla Sempronia Magna
MMA> M Minucius Audens
MIP> M Iulius Perusianus

==========================================================================================================

Item II Appointment of a Praetor of California Marcus Martianus Gangalius is appointed Praetor of California

TGP>Uti Rogas. I believe he is the better of our two candidates and will leave it at that. I request that the Tribunes include my full statement on Marcus Martianus Gangalius as part of their Senate report.

GEM> Uti Rogas
GPL> I vote Abstineo on both items. REVISED VOTE: LAENAS: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus speaks my thoughts exactly. I also wish to revise my vote as follows:
Marcus Martianus Gangalius is appointed Praetor of California Laenas: VTI ROGAS
L. Iunius Bassus is appointed Praetor of California Laenas: Antiquo
PMS> antiquo
GFBM> Antiquo. After looking through the archives of the Main List and
reading how Gangalius handled his objections to Gens reform I wonder
how much respect he has for authority, namely the authority of the
senate. As a provincial governor he works for the senate, I have my
doubts that he will follow the will of the senate, instead following
his own. He does indeed have an impressive resume, but within Nova
Roma I have no positive image of him only inflammatory rhetoric and
that is all I have in which to judge him. Additionally, I am
disturbed that on the Gens Martiana website there is a page were
people can "apply" to join Gens Martianus -- citizenship approvals is
the task of the censors. If his way of getting around Gens reform is
to have non-Nova Romans in his Gens then I wonder if he will be trying
to recruit for his Gens or whether he will focus on recruitment for
Nova Roma. I just noticed this minutes before I cast my vote so there
is not time to research it, if it comes to light that this is not the
case then I will stand corrected. But the Gens Martiana "Application"
page makes NO reference to Nova Roma.

TOPA> Antiquo.
I have little reason to believe his demeanor has changed. California is
in need of positive leadership, which I believe not to be one of his
main attributes.

MOG> UTI ROGAS.

CFBQ> The text from the gens Martiana website made it easy to vote

ANTIQUO to Marcus Martianus Gangalius,

especially as I think his arrogant and disloyal behavior, that is
clearly shown below, don't make him suited to lead any Nova Roman
province.

At 20.12 -0400 07-04-28, David Kling (Modianus) wrote:
>Whereas Nova Roma's ever-growing list of onerous citizenship
>requirements has discouraged applicants to the gens Martiana from
>completing the citizenship process; and
>
>Whereas the gens Martiana was established in MMDCCLI ab urbe condita,
>anno Martis CCVII and was accepted by the Censors of Nova Roma, yet
>the Censors of Nova Roma now obstruct new citizens from joining the
>gens, effectively making the gens a closed one against its will and
>threatening its eventual extinction; and
>
>Whereas the current policy of the Censors of Nova Roma constitutes an
>ex post facto law to the disparagement of the principles of Roman
>justice, and violates the most basic human right, that of identity,
>such right being derived from jus naturale, which is recognized as a
>source of law in Roman jurisprudence;
>
>Therefore be it resolved that the gens Martiana, acting in the
>interest of its very survival as well as its liberty, declares said
>policy of the Censors of Nova Roma to be unjust and un-Roman, that the
>gens opens its membership to all people who profess any of the
>Mediterranean and European cultures that existed during the Republican
>and Imperial periods of classical Rome, and that no distinction shall
>be made among members of the gens as to their status in Nova Roma; and
>
>Resolved, that since the republic now discourages the growth of the
>gens Martiana, thus the gens is no longer obligated to encourage the
>growth of the republic, and indeed, the growth of the republic has
>become inimical to the interests of our gens and our constituent
>familiae, all mention of Nova Roma shall be removed from the Gens
>Martiana website.
QSP> QSP Abstenio , REVISED VOTE> I first abstained on both candidates but I have decided to revise my vote.
Personally I would like to have had QFM stay on as Proconsul in California
and I listed my reasons on a number of occasions. No provinces have grown in
great leaps and bounds and starting with myself, I feel that stones should
not be thrown in a glass house. We shall soon see if changing out QFM will
resolve anything there.> Item II Appointment of a Praetor of California
> Marcus Martianus Gangalius is appointed Praetor of California> QSP: UTI ROGAS
Some of us have lost it on a few occasions, were ready to throw in the towel
or strangle the administration (figuratively speaking) but came back and
accomplished things with great vigour. The past is the past and now is what
will count in my opinion. > Item III Appointment of a Praetor of California
> L. Iunius Bassus is appointed Praetor of California > QSP - ABSTENIO>
> I also hope he'll be appointed as a Legate and in time should be groomed to
run for Propraetor. Meanwhile availability and transport are critical for
this job.
CEC> ANTIQUO
MMPH> Negas. I have no objection against candidatus Martianus; I simply
prefer that the other candidatus be given an opportunity for the
current year.
LAF> Antiqvo. I have nothing against him. But I must state my
preference of Bassus because I can testimony his capacity of work.
LECA> VTI ROGAS
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=173
I don't believe that anything I would say on Marcus' behalf would change the minds of those who oppose him. I will say that while many have quit for far lesser reason than he had to leave he stayed and has offered himself again for service. He has given us a very impressive resume and taken time to debate and defend himself in the Forum. I have not seen anything from the other candidate. I would have been pleased to see his resume. Also, I think that the Consules should have given us more information as to the candidates age, length of citizenship, service record during the contio. Does the other candidate still wish to be appointed? Or perhaps he sees the wisdom in taking a Legate position as a proper first step?
CFD> VTI ROGAS
CL> Antiquo.
QFM> VTI ROGAS
I wasn't going to vote in protest about the shabby way I was treated after spending the time, money and effort in keeping California viable. I was especially saddened by the fact most Senators here are sheep, unable to do nothing but follow the herd. Next time you want to know about me, ask me directly, don't listen to people who are my avowed enemies.
That said, people who do know me voted me to stay, and I'll not soon forget their kindness.

I have known Marcus Martianus Gangalius since I met him at Celebrate History in 1999. He is intelligent, grounded in history, a follower of the Religio, and has independence. He is the obvious choice.
He also never quit Nova Roma when he could have, he backed the wrong side in the Constitutional Wars and was censored for it. I only say that, because continuity is an important thing.
Yes, he was disappointed when his Gens was broken up. Who wouldn't be? But he has taken no loyalty oath that says he has to accept all of NR's changes. Keep that in mind when you read that proclamation. He is loyal to Rome unlike loudmouthed Senators here would like you to believe. Otherwise he would not have stepped forward when asked to do so.
ATMC: ANTIQUO.
ATS> Neither candidate is a perfect choice, but I have very serious reservations about this candidate in light of his behavior toward me and others as well as with regard to items drawn from the website of what he refers to as HIS gens. ANTIQVO.
DIPI> VTI ROGAS
MBA> antiquo
GSA> I vote against it. He does not seem to be cast off the right material to me.
SAS> ANTIQUO
CCS> Antiquo.

FAC> ABSTINEO

JSM> ANTIQUO

MMA> This vote is a difficult one to make between two candidates who have different attributes for taking on the position.
Personally, I do not care for Gangalious, or his actions and writings, nor do I particularly care for the great list of his qualifications. However those are personal feelings, and as a Senator should have no aspect in my voting.
Candidate Bassus seems a sincre young man without many ways to deal with his job, and California is not as easy to getaround in without personal transportation as is Britannia. Many wh have never visited Califiornia do not realize that. I too was disappointed that Senator Maximus was outed from this position, and Itend to think his reasoning was sound n his arguments against it. The current "discussion" over this partiular vote seems to support that view, and who should know better than he, who was the ProConsul there for years?
However, I personally hope that Senasoor Maximus will assist Gangulous in his duties, and if Bassus accepts a position as Legate, both of these aspects woud gofar to relieve my anxieties in regard to this vote.
Item 1-- Gangulous for Preator of the Province of Calif.
--MMA--YES
Item 2--Bassus for Praetor of the Province of Calif.
--MMA--NO I make this vote without makice toward any, and hope sincerely that my vote will see the provinc through the coming serious considerations of Nova Roma;

MIP> Abstineo

======================================================================================================

Item III Appointment of a Praetor of California L. Iunius Bassus is appointed Praetor of California

TGP>Antiquo I do wish that L. Iunius Bassus will be willing to serve an apprenticeship under Marcus Martianus Gangalius and if he does we will have two citizens eager to help California grow.
GEM> Abstiene
GPL> I vote Abstineo on both items. REVISED VOTE: LAENAS: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus speaks my thoughts exactly. I also wish to revise my vote as follows:
Marcus Martianus Gangalius is appointed Praetor of California Laenas: VTI ROGAS
L. Iunius Bassus is appointed Praetor of California Laenas: Antiquo
PMS> vti rogas
GFBM> Uti rogas. For the record I don't consider Bassus a "croney" as has
been insinuated by Consul Paulinus who seems to think a vote for
Bassus is a vote for "cronyism," and I resent the implication. I have
no idea whether this young man will be successful, but I'm willing to
give him a chance and if he doesn't prove successful we find another
option.
TOPA> Uti rogas.
Though I don't know him personally, I will trust the recommendation of
several of my colleagues.
MOG> ANTIQUO, without malice; I vote instead for Gangalius, and
thank L. Iunius Bassus for his willingness to serve.
CFBQ> UTI ROGAS to L. Iunius Bassus as PROpraetor of California.
I will vote to give Provincia California a new governor. Bassus is
new as a a leader in Nova Roma and California and I am not sure that
he will be up to this task, but he wouldn't be the first citizen to
be given a fair chance to prove himself at this level. If he can do
it, fine and if not, the Senate will have to look for a new one next
year. But I will NOT vote to replace the old arrogant and incompetent
governor with a new one that is as arrogant and disloyal and who
hasn't proven himself either.
QSP Abstenio . REVISED VOTE> I first abstained on both candidates but I have decided to revise my vote.
Personally I would like to have had QFM stay on as Proconsul in California
and I listed my reasons on a number of occasions. No provinces have grown in
great leaps and bounds and starting with myself, I feel that stones should
not be thrown in a glass house. We shall soon see if changing out QFM will
resolve anything there.> Item II Appointment of a Praetor of California
> Marcus Martianus Gangalius is appointed Praetor of California> QSP: UTI ROGAS
Some of us have lost it on a few occasions, were ready to throw in the towel
or strangle the administration (figuratively speaking) but came back and
accomplished things with great vigour. The past is the past and now is what
will count in my opinion. > Item III Appointment of a Praetor of California
> L. Iunius Bassus is appointed Praetor of California > QSP - ABSTENIO>
> I also hope he'll be appointed as a Legate and in time should be groomed to
run for Propraetor. Meanwhile availability and transport are critical for
this job.

CEC> UTI ROGAS
I particularly like this bit from the resolution on the gens Martiana
website:

"since the republic now discourages the growth of the gens Martiana,
thus the gens is no longer obligated to encourage the growth of the
republic, and indeed, the growth of the republic has become inimical
to the interests of our gens and our constituent familiae, all mention
of Nova Roma shall be removed from the Gens Martiana website."

I would be more impressed if he had figured out a way of not
mentioning the proper name of the Republic at all throughout, as
otherwise the resolution violates itself. When I was a boy, talk like
this would have seen him setting up a little house on some bleak
promontory overlooking the Black Sea.
MMPH> Uti Rogas.
LAF> UT ROGAS. I have much confidence on Bassus capacities.
LECA> Antiquo
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=10303
I'm pleased that we have a choice, but I believe that Bassus should begin as a Legate as has been suggested, a fine idea.
CFD> Antiquo
CL> Uti rogas.
As a side note - considering that the only point which has been raised in criticism against L. Iunius Bassus is that he is a student without his own transportation - that was true of me when I took on the governorship of Britannia, so it is not impossible!
QFM> Antiquo
ATMC: VTI ROGAS.
ATS> VTI ROGAS.
DIPI> Antiquo
MBA> Uti Rogas
GSA> I vote in favour.
SAS> UTI ROGAS
However I hope they will be able to work together in good spirit.
CCS> Uti rogas.

FAC> ABSTINEO. I don't know this gentlemen.

JSM> UTI ROGAS

MMA> This vote is a difficult one to make between two candidates who have different attributes for taking on the position.
Personally, I do not care for Gangalious, or his actions and writings, nor do I particularly care for the great list of his qualifications. However those are personal feelings, and as a Senator should have no aspect in my voting.
Candidate Bassus seems a sincre young man without many ways to deal with his job, and California is not as easy to getaround in without personal transportation as is Britannia. Many wh have never visited Califiornia do not realize that. I too was disappointed that Senator Maximus was outed from this position, and Itend to think his reasoning was sound n his arguments against it. The current "discussion" over this partiular vote seems to support that view, and who should know better than he, who was the ProConsul there for years?
However, I personally hope that Senasoor Maximus will assist Gangulous in his duties, and if Bassus accepts a position as Legate, both of these aspects woud gofar to relieve my anxieties in regard to this vote.
Item 1-- Gangulous for Preator of the Province of Calif.
--MMA--YES
Item 2--Bassus for Praetor of the Province of Calif.
--MMA--NO I make this vote without makice toward any, and hope sincerely that my vote will see the provinc through the coming serious considerations of Nova Roma;

MIP> Abstineo
=================================================================================================

RESULTS OF ITEM II:

VTI ROGAS: 10
ANTIQVO: 15
ABSTINEO: 2

NOT PASSED

RESULTS OF ITEM III:

VTI ROGAS: 15
ANTIQVO: 8
ABSTINEO: 4

PASSED

The Senate appoints L. Iunius Bassus as Praetor of Provincia Californiae.

Optime Valete

M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
PROPRAETOR HISPANIAE
SCRIBA CENSORIS GFBM
NOVA ROMA
-------------------------------------------
ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50164 From: Jorge Hernandez Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Authentic Togas
Hello out there;

Does anyone know of any websites where one can purchase Roman style clothing, especially authentic looking Togas. So much of the stuff you see for sale looks cheap, cheesy and totally unRoman, and more befitting of some 1950s sword-and-sandal Holltwood epic.

Vale,
G. Antonius Mulus




---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50165 From: William Cox Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
At the risk of totally getting off subject, I saw a
little media blurp that covered the issue of where do
you draw a line for "newcomers" rights There is a
former mosque in Spain (sorry cant recall the name but
its the famous one in South which was converted into a
church.Well there is a small movement to revert it to
a mosque (which isnt going over with the Catholics).
Since Christians are not allowed to pray at mosques
that were coverted from Churches. One of the Issues
(Im raising) is that Europe is trying to be a leader
in progressive thinking and its turning into in theory
we can can really do anything, which I doubt will work
in the long run. But this is another subject all
together.

back to the Constantine Christian or Dictator subject:



--- "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)"
<mjk@...> wrote:

> Salvete omnes,
>
> One question that pops up more and more on media
> shows and forums
> regarding the rights of newcomers to my marco nation
> is that we bend
> over backwards and even legislate protection for
> various groups and
> minorities who settle here but would they do the
> same, IE go to bat
> for any of us if we were in their country?
>
> Hmmm, the situation metioned below will certainly
> not help Turkey's
> case for entrance into the EUC unless the jailed are
> released and the
> murderer's of the third chap are severely punished
> with lengthy jail
> terms. As the current pope said, Europe and America
> bends over
> backwards and allows mosques to be built and the
> existence of Islamic
> schools so isn't about time the Islamic world
> reciprocates? Sigh,well
> try and imagine what would happen to those
> unfortunates promoting the
> Religio over there!
>
> QSP
>
>
>
> >
> > Also I saw something on the three missionaries
> > (missionaries is kind of misleading since at least
> one
> > was a Christian Turk)killed in Turkey which
> mentioned
> > that one (of the three) was Jailed for handing out
> > Bibles earlier (either late last year or earlier
> this
> > year).Turkey is a secular nation but is it a crime
> to
> > hand out all religion,or the non Islamic
> > branches(think of this as a informal question).
> >
>
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50166 From: geranioj@aol.com Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: Authentic Togas
I will tell you when I directed a church play, I wanted the original togas and other Roman textiles to look as authentic as possible. The best way to get this done is through a nice costume shop, or better a costumer at a community theatre in your area. This way you can get the material and the look you want, it is not the cheapest, but well worth it. There are Roman re-enactment groups that may be able to help in other Yahoo groups. Costumers are well versed in authenticity.

Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: centurion_4545@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 3 May 2007 2:26 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Authentic Togas


Hello out there;

Does anyone know of any websites where one can purchase Roman style clothing, especially authentic looking Togas. So much of the stuff you see for sale looks cheap, cheesy and totally unRoman, and more befitting of some 1950s sword-and-sandal Holltwood epic.

Vale,
G. Antonius Mulus

---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50167 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: Authentic Togas
Salve G. Antoni;
you can buy one at LaWren's Nest, but if you join the new
sodalitas
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalitas_Vestitorum_et_Sutorum/
they'll help you make your own. It's only a few stiches & the rest
drapes. This way you can buy the finest linen or wool & have
something utterly authentic. I can buy great linen for $17.00 a
yard, I just need one;-) & then a tiny [I don't sew] bit of sewing.
Maior
>
> Hello out there;
>
> Does anyone know of any websites where one can purchase Roman
style clothing, especially authentic looking Togas. So much of the
stuff you see for sale looks cheap, cheesy and totally unRoman, and
more befitting of some 1950s sword-and-sandal Holltwood epic.
>
> Vale,
> G. Antonius Mulus
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
> Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50168 From: Jorge Hernandez Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
Frankly I find a large part of the subject highly disturbing. I myself am a believing Christian and nothing in the world could ever make me deny my faith and my Lord. HOWEVER, I find the modern-day lack of religious tolerance among many people nowadays as not only disturbing, but also dangerous. One of the many reasons I admire the ancient Romans was their live-and-let-live attitude towards different religious faiths. Instances of religious persecution arose only when a real - or perceived - threat to the mos maiorum from a particular mode of worship showed itself. Although religious persecution of any type should never be condoned, I believe that among the Romans it occurred far less than among other cultures then and now. In addition, although persecution of Christians and Jews did occur on several occasions, it occurred far, far less than Hollywood would have us believe. And so I say, Damn the ideologies and long live freedom!

AVE ATQUE VALE
G. ANTONIUS MULUS



William Cox <indyguy301@...> wrote: At the risk of totally getting off subject, I saw a
little media blurp that covered the issue of where do
you draw a line for "newcomers" rights There is a
former mosque in Spain (sorry cant recall the name but
its the famous one in South which was converted into a
church.Well there is a small movement to revert it to
a mosque (which isnt going over with the Catholics).
Since Christians are not allowed to pray at mosques
that were coverted from Churches. One of the Issues
(Im raising) is that Europe is trying to be a leader
in progressive thinking and its turning into in theory
we can can really do anything, which I doubt will work
in the long run. But this is another subject all
together.

back to the Constantine Christian or Dictator subject:

--- "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)"
<mjk@...> wrote:

> Salvete omnes,
>
> One question that pops up more and more on media
> shows and forums
> regarding the rights of newcomers to my marco nation
> is that we bend
> over backwards and even legislate protection for
> various groups and
> minorities who settle here but would they do the
> same, IE go to bat
> for any of us if we were in their country?
>
> Hmmm, the situation metioned below will certainly
> not help Turkey's
> case for entrance into the EUC unless the jailed are
> released and the
> murderer's of the third chap are severely punished
> with lengthy jail
> terms. As the current pope said, Europe and America
> bends over
> backwards and allows mosques to be built and the
> existence of Islamic
> schools so isn't about time the Islamic world
> reciprocates? Sigh,well
> try and imagine what would happen to those
> unfortunates promoting the
> Religio over there!
>
> QSP
>
>
>
> >
> > Also I saw something on the three missionaries
> > (missionaries is kind of misleading since at least
> one
> > was a Christian Turk)killed in Turkey which
> mentioned
> > that one (of the three) was Jailed for handing out
> > Bibles earlier (either late last year or earlier
> this
> > year).Turkey is a secular nation but is it a crime
> to
> > hand out all religion,or the non Islamic
> > branches(think of this as a informal question).
> >
>
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com







---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50169 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-05-03
Subject: Re: EX OFFICIO C. EQVITI CATONIS A. TVLLIAE SCHOLASTICAE PRAETORVM
> A. Tullia Scholastica Wesley quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae
> voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
>
>
> Maior:
>
> You're a lawyer in the macro-world? Me too, for what it's worth...
>
> ATS: We have a number of attorneys among the citizens of Nova Roma.
> Fuscus and Albucius are among them; one of our finest young citizens, Cordus,
> is taking an intensive law course in England, and there are other attorneys
> among us as well. Maior is a graduate student in another field at present;
> she was an attorney in Ireland. Our citizens come from all walks of life,
> from astronomer Marinus to attorneys to teachers and professors to police
> officers to business people to just about anything you can think of. Maybe we
> even have a zoologist among us...
>
> -Wes
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
> Quam optime vale et valete.
>
> ATS
>
> In a message dated 5/2/2007 6:07:47 PM Central Daylight Time,
> rory12001@... <mailto:rory12001%40yahoo.com> writes:
>
> M. Hortensia praetoribus spd;
> well, speaking as a lawyer. None of us except those in the
> Senate knew of this exchange, until Q. Fabius Maximus started the
> suit & the conversation was published here. Maximus broadcast what
> he disliked to all & sundry. So if anyone has damaged Maximus'
> reputation, it is himself.
> Very ironic, since incompetance is at the heart of the
> charge of Calumniae.
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
>> > On a.d. III Kal. Maias, Quintus Fabius Maximus issued a petitio
>> > actionis to the praetors of the Republic, to wit:
>> >
>> >
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> +
>> >
>> > "Senator Maximus request [sic] that charge of CALVMNIAE (see
> below) be
>> > lodged against Senator Quintilianus for the false and misleading
>> > statement:
>> >
>> > 'But I will NOT vote to replace the old arrogant and incompetent
>> > governor...'
>> >
>> > I. Q. Fabius Maximus is not incompetent. He is no more arrogant
> then
>> > any one else in the Senate.
>> > II. California declined in spite of Q. Fabius Maximus' efforts.
> The
>> > war in Mesopotamia with the deployment of the armed forces and the
>> > graduations from the Universities where Nova Roma citizens mostly
>> > resided, caused the decline, not any incompetency of Q. Fabius
> Maximus.
>> >
>> > Thus, Q. Fabius Maximus, because of these misleading statements has
>> > had his Dignitas dimensioned [sic - we believe he intended to say
>> > "diminished" "diminished"<WBR>] and his Auctor
>> >
>> > He demands, as is his right, that Senator Quintilianus be punished
> for
>> > his statements, and a apology be issued before the Senate to the
>> > Senator, by Senator Quintilianus in order to restore the Senator's
>> > good name."
>> >
>> >
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> +
>> >
>> > This is formal notice that under the terms of the lex Salicia
>> > iudicaria, we are required to accept this petitio and will
> therefore
>> > be appointing iudices and forming a court to determine the
> validity of
>> > the actor's claim.
>> >
>> > Given under our hands a.d. VI Non. Mai. a.u.c. MMDCCLX L. Arminio
>> > Fausto Ti. Galerio Paulino coss.
>> >
>> > Gaius Equitius Cato
>> > Aula Tullia Scholastica
>> > Praetors
>> >
>> > N.B. - the lex Salicia iudicaria can be found here:



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50170 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: a.d. IV NOn. Mai.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem IV Nonas Maias; haec dies comitialis est.

"And why not admit that Fortune also retrieved the city in times of
the greatest danger? When [390 BC] the Gauls were encamped round about
the Capitol and were besieging the citadel,

'Baneful the plague that she brought on the host, and the people were
dying.' [Homer, Iliad i.10]

And as for the Gauls' nocturnal assault, though they were noticed by
none, yet Fortune and Chance brought about the discovery. Concerning
this assault of the Gauls it will perhaps not be unseasonable to give
some additional details, however briefly. After the great defeat of
the Romans at the river Allia, some in their flight found a haven in
Rome and filled the people with consternation and terror, and caused
them to scatter far and wide, although a few went to the Capitol and
prepared to stand a siege. Others, immediately after their defeat,
gathered together at Veii and appointed as dictator Furius Camillus,
whom the people in their prosperity and lofty pride had rejected and
deposed because he had become involved in a suit concerning the
appropriation of public property. But now, cowed and humbled after
their defeat, they were for recalling him, and offered to hand over to
him the supreme command, accountable to no one. Accordingly, that he
might not be thought to be obtaining office because of the crisis, but
in accordance with the law, and that he should not, as if he had given
up all hope for the city, be elected by soldiery in a canvass of the
remnants of the army, now scattered and wandering, it was necessary
that the senators on the Capitoline should vote upon the matter after
they had been informed of the decision of the soldiers. Now there was
a certain Gaius Pontius, a brave man, who, by volunteering personally
to report these resolutions to Senate on the Capitol, took upon
himself great danger. For the way led through the midst of the enemy,
who encompassed the citadel with sentries and palisades. When,
accordingly, he had come by night to the river, he bound broad strips
of cork beneath his breast and, entrusting his body to the buoyancy of
this support, committed himself to the stream. Encountering a gentle
current which bore him slowly down stream, he reached the opposite
bank in safety, and, climbing out of the river, advanced toward the
senate void of lights, inferring from the darkness and quiet that no
one was there. Clinging to the precipitous cliff and entrusting
himself to the support of sloping and circuitous ways and jagged
surfaces of the rock which would allow a foothold or afford a clutch
for his hand, he reached the top of the rock; he was received by the
sentries, and made known to those within the decision of the army,
band having obtained the decree of the Senate, he returned again to
Camillus.

The next day one of the barbarians was wandering idly about this
place, when he saw in one spot prints of feet and marks of slipping,
and in another the bruising and tearing off of the grass, which grew
on the earth of the cliff, and marks of the zigzag dragging and
pulling up of a body; and this he told to the others. They, thinking
that the way was pointed out to them by their enemies, attempted to
rival them; and waiting till the very dead of night, they made the
ascent, unnoticed not only by the sentinels, but also by the dogs
which shared guard duty and formed the outpost, but then were overcome
by sleep.

Rome's Fortune, however, did not lack a voice capable of revealing and
declaring such a great mischance. Sacred geese were kept near the
temple of Juno for the service of the goddess. Now by nature this bird
is easily disturbed and frightened by noise; and at this time, since
they were neglected, because dire want oppressed the garrison, their
sleep was light, and was made uncomfortable by hunger, with the result
that they were at once aware of the enemy as they showed themselves
above the edge of the cliff. The geese hissed at them and rushed at
them impetuously, and at the sight of arms, became even more excited,
and filled the place with piercing and discordant clamour. By this
the Romans were aroused, and, when they comprehended what had
happened, they forced back their enemies and hurled them over the
precipice. And even to this day, in memory of these events, there are
borne in solemn procession a dog impaled on a stake, but a goose
perched in state upon a costly coverlet in a litter." - Plutarch, "On
the Fortunes of The Romans" 11, 12

"While those who had taken refuge on the Capitol were still being
besieged, a youth who had been sent by the Romans from Veii to those
on the Capitol and had escaped the notice of the Gauls who were on
guard there, went up, delivered his message, and departed again by
night. When it was day, one of the Gauls saw his tracks and reported
it to the king, who called together the bravest of his men and showed
them where the Roman had gone up, then asked them to display the same
bravery as the Roman and attempt to ascend to the citadel, promising
many gifts to those who should make the ascent. When many undertook to
do so, he commanded the guards to remain quiet, in order that the
Romans, supposing them to be asleep, might themselves turn to sleep.
When the first men had now ascended and were waiting for those who
lagged behind, in order that when their numbers were increased they
might then slay the garrison and capture the stronghold, no mortal
became aware of it; but some sacred geese of Juno which were being
raised in the sanctuary, by making a clamour and at the same time
rushing at the barbarians, gave notice of the peril. Thereupon there
was confusion, shouting and rushing about on the part of all as they
encouraged one another to take up arms; and the Gauls, whose numbers
were now increased, advanced further inside." - Dionysius of
Halicarnassus, "Roman Antiquities" XIII.7

"While the Romans were in such throes, the neighbouring Tyrrhenians
advanced and made a raid with a strong army on the territory of the
Romans, capturing many prisoners and not a small amount of booty. But
the Romans who had fled to Veii, falling unexpectedly upon the
Tyrrhenians, put them to flight, took back the booty, and captured
their camp. Having got possession of arms in abundance, they
distributed them among the unarmed, and they also gathered men from
the countryside and armed them, since they intended to relieve the
siege of the soldiers who had taken refuge on the Capitoline. While
they were at a loss how they might reveal their plans to the besieged,
since the Celts had surrounded them with strong forces, a certain
Cominius Pontius undertook to get the cheerful news to the men on the
Capitoline. Starting out alone and swimming the river by night, he
got unseen to a cliff of the Capitoline that was hard to climb and,
hauling himself up it with difficulty, told the soldiers on the
Capitoline about the troops that had been collected in Veii and how
they were watching for an opportunity and would attack the Celts.
Then, descending by the way he had mounted and swimming the Tiber, he
returned to Veii. The Celts, when they observed the tracks of one who
had recently climbed up, made plans to ascend at night by the same
cliff. Consequently about the middle of the night, while the guards
were neglectful of their watch because of the strength of the place,
some Celts started an ascent of the cliff. They escaped detection by
the guards, but the sacred geese of Hera, which were kept there,
noticed the climbers and set up a cackling. The guards rushed to the
place and the Celts deterred did not dare proceed farther. A certain
Marcus Mallius, a man held in high esteem, rushing to the defence of
the place, cut off the hand of the climber with his sword and,
striking him on the breast with his shield, rolled him from the cliff.
In like manner the second climber met his death, whereupon the rest
all quickly turned in flight. But since the cliff was precipitous they
were all hurled headlong and perished. As a result of this, when the
Romans sent ambassadors to negotiate a peace, they were persuaded,
upon receipt of one thousand pounds of gold, to leave the city and to
withdraw from Roman territory." - Diodorus Siculus, The Library
14.CXVI.1-7

Today is not the anniversary of the story of the sacred geese. I just
like the story and it's an otherwise relatively quiet day in Roman
history.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Plutarch, Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Diodorus Siculus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50171 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Nova Roma Taxes Due, 5/4/2007, 12:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Nova Roma Taxes Due
 
Date:   Friday May 4, 2007
Time:   12:00 pm - 1:00 pm
Repeats:   This event repeats every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday until Thursday May 31, 2007.
Notes:   The Tax Edict (rates, address, other info) is at http://novaroma.org/nr/Tax_rate_%28Nova_Roma%29

NEW! Pay through the Album Civium!

* 1. log in at Album Civium ( http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album )
* 2. go to My Account
* 3. go to "make payment"
* 4. add citizens to the list if paying for multiple citizens
* 5. choose pay pal or check
* 6. if choosing pay pal, continue through pay pal until it sends you back to My Account
* 7. if choosing check, print and mail

 
Copyright © 2007  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50172 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Nova Roman Court List
Cato omnes SPD

Salvete omnes.

The court in which Senator Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus will answer
the charge of calumniae brought against him by Senator Quintus Fabius
Maximus will be held openly, on this List:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Novaromatribunalis/

Anyone may join the List to witness the proceedings, but only the
praetors, actor and reus, iudices, and any advocati will be allowed to
speak in court.

Over the course of the next nundinum, the ten iudices will be chosen
and contacted by myself or my colleague A. Tullia Scholastica and
asked to serve. The trial will open on a.d XVI Kalendas Maias, and
proceed through a.d. XIII Kal. Mai.; it will recess for the
observation of the Agonalia and Tubilustrium (a.d. XII - a.d. IX Kal.
Mai.) and will resume on a.d. VIII Kal. Mai.

In the modern Western calendar, the trial will take place on May 17-20
and 25-31; if need be the dates will be expanded, but I am hopeful
that with clear direction and little wasted time it can be resolved
before the kalends of Iunius.

Valete,

Gaius Equitius Cato
Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50173 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Nova Roman Court List
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

I encourage every citizen of Nova Roma to join this list and witness the
proceedings as Senator Quintus Fabius Maximus attempts to show how Senator
Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus lowered his dignitas.

Fabius Maximus vs. Fabius Buteo.

Valete:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus

On 5/4/07, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato omnes SPD
>
> Salvete omnes.
>
> The court in which Senator Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus will answer
> the charge of calumniae brought against him by Senator Quintus Fabius
> Maximus will be held openly, on this List:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Novaromatribunalis/
>
> Anyone may join the List to witness the proceedings, but only the
> praetors, actor and reus, iudices, and any advocati will be allowed to
> speak in court.
>
> Over the course of the next nundinum, the ten iudices will be chosen
> and contacted by myself or my colleague A. Tullia Scholastica and
> asked to serve. The trial will open on a.d XVI Kalendas Maias, and
> proceed through a.d. XIII Kal. Mai.; it will recess for the
> observation of the Agonalia and Tubilustrium (a.d. XII - a.d. IX Kal.
> Mai.) and will resume on a.d. VIII Kal. Mai.
>
> In the modern Western calendar, the trial will take place on May 17-20
> and 25-31; if need be the dates will be expanded, but I am hopeful
> that with clear direction and little wasted time it can be resolved
> before the kalends of Iunius.
>
> Valete,
>
> Gaius Equitius Cato
> Praetor
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50174 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Threats of violence from Q. Fabius Maximus
Citizens,

If you have been threatened with violence of any kind by Q. Fabius Maximus,
and are willing to make a statement for the record, please contact the Censores.
Additionally, if there is other improper, immoral, or scandalous behaviour that
we should be made aware of, please inform us.

Valete,
M. Octavius Gracchus, Censor.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com

-"Apes don't read philosophy."
-"Yes they do, Otto, they just don't understand it! Let me correct
you on a few things: Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of
Buddhism is not 'every man for himself'. And the London Underground is
not a political movement! Those are all mistakes. I looked them up."
-from "A Fish Called Wanda"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50175 From: William Cox Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: True or False, Constantine was a Christian
Romans did have a live and let live mode of operation
within some guild lines for example you can worship
any God, Gods you wish as long as you pay honor the
Roman Gods, since the Christians refused to do so they
were seen as being dangerous and perverted Nero might
have made them a early Target after the Burning of
Rome which other Emperors expanded on burning,
torturing, and feeding them to the Lions were fairly
rare only because most Christians were
Crypto-Christians and only when Constantine made it
legal did things change (oddly enough about a 100
years later it became illegal to worship other Gods
than the Christian one, in effect reversing the rule
book).in no time in history has there been total
tolerance.

Secular democratic Government is in my belief
(perhaps I am a product of the 20th century), a very
noble style of leadership, but to ignore the issues
outside our umbrella of safety is a bit foolish (with
the freedom to have a dialog comes the responsibility
to speak honestly and informally) , I can/will not
apologies for concerns I have for either the safety of
Christians in Turkey for intolerance to other faiths
anywhere.This the people of this world are both
beautiful and disturbing the best thing we can do is
not become in trapped in other people/groups issues or
fear of a honest dialog because we might find it
disturbing.


--- Jorge Hernandez <centurion_4545@...> wrote:

> Frankly I find a large part of the subject highly
> disturbing. I myself am a believing Christian and
> nothing in the world could ever make me deny my
> faith and my Lord. HOWEVER, I find the modern-day
> lack of religious tolerance among many people
> nowadays as not only disturbing, but also dangerous.
> One of the many reasons I admire the ancient Romans
> was their live-and-let-live attitude towards
> different religious faiths. Instances of religious
> persecution arose only when a real - or perceived -
> threat to the mos maiorum from a particular mode of
> worship showed itself. Although religious
> persecution of any type should never be condoned, I
> believe that among the Romans it occurred far less
> than among other cultures then and now. In addition,
> although persecution of Christians and Jews did
> occur on several occasions, it occurred far, far
> less than Hollywood would have us believe. And so I
> say, Damn the ideologies and long live freedom!
>
> AVE ATQUE VALE
> G. ANTONIUS MULUS
>
>
>
> William Cox <indyguy301@...> wrote:
> At the risk of totally getting
> off subject, I saw a
> little media blurp that covered the issue of where
> do
> you draw a line for "newcomers" rights There is a
> former mosque in Spain (sorry cant recall the name
> but
> its the famous one in South which was converted
> into a
> church.Well there is a small movement to revert it
> to
> a mosque (which isnt going over with the
> Catholics).
> Since Christians are not allowed to pray at mosques
> that were coverted from Churches. One of the Issues
> (Im raising) is that Europe is trying to be a
> leader
> in progressive thinking and its turning into in
> theory
> we can can really do anything, which I doubt will
> work
> in the long run. But this is another subject all
> together.
>
> back to the Constantine Christian or Dictator
> subject:
>
> --- "Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kelly)"
> <mjk@...> wrote:
>
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > One question that pops up more and more on media
> > shows and forums
> > regarding the rights of newcomers to my marco
> nation
> > is that we bend
> > over backwards and even legislate protection for
> > various groups and
> > minorities who settle here but would they do the
> > same, IE go to bat
> > for any of us if we were in their country?
> >
> > Hmmm, the situation metioned below will certainly
> > not help Turkey's
> > case for entrance into the EUC unless the jailed
> are
> > released and the
> > murderer's of the third chap are severely
> punished
> > with lengthy jail
> > terms. As the current pope said, Europe and
> America
> > bends over
> > backwards and allows mosques to be built and the
> > existence of Islamic
> > schools so isn't about time the Islamic world
> > reciprocates? Sigh,well
> > try and imagine what would happen to those
> > unfortunates promoting the
> > Religio over there!
> >
> > QSP
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Also I saw something on the three missionaries
> > > (missionaries is kind of misleading since at
> least
> > one
> > > was a Christian Turk)killed in Turkey which
> > mentioned
> > > that one (of the three) was Jailed for handing
> out
> > > Bibles earlier (either late last year or
> earlier
> > this
> > > year).Turkey is a secular nation but is it a
> crime
> > to
> > > hand out all religion,or the non Islamic
> > > branches(think of this as a informal question).
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
> Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50176 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: EDICTUM GAI EQUITI CATONI PRAETORIS
Ex officio G. Equitius Cato praetore

In view of the fact that a trial is going to take place involving
Senator Quintus Fabius Maximus' charge of calumniae against Senator
Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus, I hereby order the censor Marcus
Octavius Gracchus to immediately withdraw his call for information
regarding Senator Quintus Fabius Maximus' past actions until such time
as the trial has concluded. It is a gross injustice for a citizen
involved in an active lawsuit to have this kind of request for
derogatory information announced, as it is serious impairment to the
partiality of the possible iudices and I will not tolerate it.

A violation of this order will be considered a violation of my
imperium as praetor of the Republic.

Given by my hand this a.d. IV Non. Mai. L. Arminio Fausto Ti. Galerio
Paulino coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50177 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM GAI EQUITI CATONI PRAETORIS
> I hereby order the censor Marcus
> Octavius Gracchus to immediately withdraw his call for information
> regarding Senator Quintus Fabius Maximus' past actions until such time
> as the trial has concluded.

Your "order" is rejected. Praetores are not above Censores.

The request for information has nothing to do with any trial, but
is rather part of an investigation concerning the words of Q. Fabius
Maximus on the Senate list this morning.

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com

-"Apes don't read philosophy."
-"Yes they do, Otto, they just don't understand it! Let me correct
you on a few things: Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of
Buddhism is not 'every man for himself'. And the London Underground is
not a political movement! Those are all mistakes. I looked them up."
-from "A Fish Called Wanda"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50178 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM GAI EQUITI CATONI PRAETORIS
Cn. Lentulus M. Octavio censori, viro amplissimo sal.:


>>> Praetores are not above Censores. >>>


I my understanding, and I think in others' too, Praetores are above Censores. Praetores do have imperium. Censores do not at all. Censores are the third magistracy after Consules and after Praetores. Censores are above Aediles, Quaestores, Tribunes.


Cura, ut valeas!






Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
R O G A T O R
-------------------------------
Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
Accensus Consulis Ti. Galerii Paulini
Scriba Aedilis Curulis Iuliae Caesaris Cytheridis Aeges
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae A. Tulliae Scholasticae
-------------------------------
Decurio I. Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Dominus Factionis Russatae
Latinista, Classicus Philologus


---------------------------------

---------------------------------
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50179 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: EDICTUM CENSORIS
EX OFFICIO M. OCTAVII GRACCHI CENSORIS

In accordance with the Constitution of Nova Roma, in which:

Secion IV.A states that the descriptions of ordinarii which follow are
listed in "decreasing order of authority", and then describes Censores
in IV.A.1 and Praetores in IV.A.3, thereby stating that Censores
are above Praetores in authority; and

Section IV.A.1.f, which states that Censores have the obligation
"to safeguard the public morality and honor through the collegial
administering of notae"; and

Section IV.A.1.a, which states that Censores have the power
"To issue those edicta (edicts) necessary to carry out those tasks
in which they are mandated by this Constitution and the law to engage
(such edicts being binding upon themselves as well as others);",

I, Marcus Octavius Gracchus, Censor, hereby declare:

1. The call for evidence of wrongdoing on the part of Q. Fabius Maximus,
including but not limited to threats of physical violence, is be part
of an investigation that may lead to a Nota against this person.

2. The Nota investigation was launched as a result of a threat of physical
violence against Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus by Q. Fabius Maximus, made
on the Senate list this morning, and is independent of any other matter
between these citizens.

3. Praetor G. Equitius Cato is hereby ordered to immediately cease all
attempted interference with the investigations of myself and my colleague
pursuant to our obligation to safeguard public morality and honour.

4. Persons with evidence of threats of violence or other wrongdoing by
Q. Fabius Maximus are hereby requested to privately contact myself or
my colleague. All statements will be confidential if requested.

M. Octavius Gracchus, Censor.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50180 From: Gregory Rose Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS
Scaurus Octavio Graccho SPD.

A censor has no imperium; it is not a curule magistracy. How do you
who have no imperium give orders to a magistrate with imperium?

Vale.

Scaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50181 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: VI Conventus Novae Romae, 5/5/2007, 12:00 am
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   VI Conventus Novae Romae
 
Date:   Saturday May 5, 2007
Time:   12:00 am - 1:00 am
Repeats:   This event repeats every week until Thursday August 9, 2007.
Location:   http://www.novaroma.org/nr/VI_Conventus_Novae_Romae
Notes:   Brush up your Latin and get your tickets for the VI Conventus Novae Romae in Emerita Augusta, Hispania (Merida, Spain).
 
Copyright © 2007  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50182 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: DE PETITIONE ACTIONIS IN CAESONEM FABIVM BVTEONEM QVINTILIANVM
A. Tullia Scholastica praetríx quirítibus, sociís, peregrínísque bonae
voluntátis S.P.D.

This afternoon I, and presumably my colleague C. Equitius Cato, to whom
it was also sent, received a message from Senator Q. Fabius Maximus stating
that he wished to withdraw his petitio actionis against Senator Caeso Fabius
Buteo Quintilianus. This should put an end to this impending lís
(lawsuit), and clear the way for any censorial investigation of Senator
Maximus¹ conduct without reference to our imperium.

Valete.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50183 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: DE PETITIONE ACTIONIS IN CAESONEM FABIVM BVTEONEM QVINTILIANVM
L. Iunius Bassus quirítibus, sociís, peregrínísque bonae voluntátis S.P.D.

I applaud Maximus' decision to withdrawal his petitio. I humbly suggest to K. Buteo and
M. Gracchus that this other matter might be allowed to drop. Words were spoken by both
sides over a contentious issue. Perhaps it would be best for everyone if we moved on.

Valete.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote:
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica praetríx quirítibus, sociís, peregrínísque bonae
> voluntátis S.P.D.
>
> This afternoon I, and presumably my colleague C. Equitius Cato, to whom
> it was also sent, received a message from Senator Q. Fabius Maximus stating
> that he wished to withdraw his petitio actionis against Senator Caeso Fabius
> Buteo Quintilianus. This should put an end to this impending lís
> (lawsuit), and clear the way for any censorial investigation of Senator
> Maximus¹ conduct without reference to our imperium.
>
> Valete.
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50184 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS
Salve Gai Iuli,

> A censor has no imperium; it is not a curule magistracy. How do you
> who have no imperium give orders to a magistrate with imperium?

The Constitution states, in I.B., that the order of precedence
of edicta is "in order of descending authority as described in section
IV of this Constitution .... Should a lower authority conflict with a
higher authority, the higher authority shall take precedence."

The constitution states that the "authority" of a Censor is higher
than that of a Praetor, without defining precisely what "authority"
is. In the Shorter OED, the first definition of "authority" is
"Power to enforce obedience".

As for our own laws, the "Lex Arminia Equitia de imperio" defines
Potestas and Imperium, but does not state which magistrates have which.

Potestas includes, among other things, the right to "compel obedience
in the name of the state, within the duties of the magistrate".

The power to "compel", then, is not limited solely to holders of
imperium. Unfortunately the law does not define which magistrates
hold potestas - a word that does not appear in the Constitution.

I doubt I could compel anyone to do anything, as I have no legions.

As this action is directly relevant to a Constitutional power and
obligation of the Censores - to pronounce a Nota - I assert that it
is within my authority to ensure that that lawful power is not
interfered with.

Praetor Cato is doing exactly the same thing, of course - using his
office to ensure that his lawful powers and obligations are not
interfered with, and I bear him no ill will for doing so.

But I believe that the matter that the Censores are investigating -
a series of violent statements, one of which took place this
morning during the discussion of the alleged offence that led
to the charge of calumnia - is a far, far more serious manner
than any alleged misapplication of the words "arrogant" and
"incompetent". That is why the investigation was launched,
and why I assert our right to continue it.

A few minutes ago, Praetrix Aula Tullia announced that the
accusation of calumnia has been dropped. As a result of this,
Praetor Cato's jury-gathering and my investigation are no longer
in conflict, and the dueling edicts are moot; so the difference
between Censorial "authority" and Praetorial "imperium" apparently
won't be put to the test today.

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com

-"Apes don't read philosophy."
-"Yes they do, Otto, they just don't understand it! Let me correct
you on a few things: Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of
Buddhism is not 'every man for himself'. And the London Underground is
not a political movement! Those are all mistakes. I looked them up."
-from "A Fish Called Wanda"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50185 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS
Cato M. Octavio Graccho omnibusque SPD

Salvete omnes.

Octavius Gracchus, The lex Arminia Equititia de imperio does not need
to define which magistrates have imperium, since the lex Constitutiva
itself does. The lex Constitutiva states quite clearly that the
praetors posses imperium (lex Const. IV.3.A). The lex Arminia Equitia
de imperio states that

"In Nova Roma, we understand Imperium as: A. Having all the rights of
potestas, as described above." (lex Arm. Equit. de imperio II.A)

So, since under the lex Constitutiva I have imperium, I also possess
potestas, under the lex Arminia Equitia de imperio.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50186 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS
Salve Gai Equiti,

> So, since under the lex Constitutiva I have imperium, I also possess
> potestas, under the lex Arminia Equitia de imperio.

Agreed. But the Constitution says I have more "authority" than you do,
and by the definition of "authority", I believe that I can require that
you not interfere with the Censors' investigation.

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com

-"Apes don't read philosophy."
-"Yes they do, Otto, they just don't understand it! Let me correct
you on a few things: Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of
Buddhism is not 'every man for himself'. And the London Underground is
not a political movement! Those are all mistakes. I looked them up."
-from "A Fish Called Wanda"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50187 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: a.d. IV NOn. Mai.
Salvete Omnes,

For anyone who has *ever* had experience of geese, as I have, this story
rings *so* true! There is nothing more sensitive than a goose who perceives
her territory to be invaded, and *nothing* more belligerent than an angry
goose! I know this, having aroused the ire of a flock as a child. I never
realized just *how* fast I could run ...until then.

C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50188 From: marcuscorneliusdexter Date: 2007-05-04
Subject: Re: a.d. IV NOn. Mai.
Interestingly, Stephen Saylor dramatizes this very incident in his new book "Roma,"
currently being discussed in the Nova Roma Book Club mailing list, though in Saylor's
fictionalized version the episode also involves an illicit love affair between a fallen Vestal
Virgin and an escaped slave who is actually the illegitimate son of the oldest patrician
family in Rome. Good stuff!



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> OSD C. Equitius Cato
>
> Salvete omnes!
>
> Hodie est ante diem IV Nonas Maias; haec dies comitialis est.
>
> "And why not admit that Fortune also retrieved the city in times of
> the greatest danger? When [390 BC] the Gauls were encamped round about
> the Capitol and were besieging the citadel,
>
> 'Baneful the plague that she brought on the host, and the people were
> dying.' [Homer, Iliad i.10]
>
> And as for the Gauls' nocturnal assault, though they were noticed by
> none, yet Fortune and Chance brought about the discovery. Concerning
> this assault of the Gauls it will perhaps not be unseasonable to give
> some additional details, however briefly. After the great defeat of
> the Romans at the river Allia, some in their flight found a haven in
> Rome and filled the people with consternation and terror, and caused
> them to scatter far and wide, although a few went to the Capitol and
> prepared to stand a siege. Others, immediately after their defeat,
> gathered together at Veii and appointed as dictator Furius Camillus,
> whom the people in their prosperity and lofty pride had rejected and
> deposed because he had become involved in a suit concerning the
> appropriation of public property. But now, cowed and humbled after
> their defeat, they were for recalling him, and offered to hand over to
> him the supreme command, accountable to no one. Accordingly, that he
> might not be thought to be obtaining office because of the crisis, but
> in accordance with the law, and that he should not, as if he had given
> up all hope for the city, be elected by soldiery in a canvass of the
> remnants of the army, now scattered and wandering, it was necessary
> that the senators on the Capitoline should vote upon the matter after
> they had been informed of the decision of the soldiers. Now there was
> a certain Gaius Pontius, a brave man, who, by volunteering personally
> to report these resolutions to Senate on the Capitol, took upon
> himself great danger. For the way led through the midst of the enemy,
> who encompassed the citadel with sentries and palisades. When,
> accordingly, he had come by night to the river, he bound broad strips
> of cork beneath his breast and, entrusting his body to the buoyancy of
> this support, committed himself to the stream. Encountering a gentle
> current which bore him slowly down stream, he reached the opposite
> bank in safety, and, climbing out of the river, advanced toward the
> senate void of lights, inferring from the darkness and quiet that no
> one was there. Clinging to the precipitous cliff and entrusting
> himself to the support of sloping and circuitous ways and jagged
> surfaces of the rock which would allow a foothold or afford a clutch
> for his hand, he reached the top of the rock; he was received by the
> sentries, and made known to those within the decision of the army,
> band having obtained the decree of the Senate, he returned again to
> Camillus.
>
> The next day one of the barbarians was wandering idly about this
> place, when he saw in one spot prints of feet and marks of slipping,
> and in another the bruising and tearing off of the grass, which grew
> on the earth of the cliff, and marks of the zigzag dragging and
> pulling up of a body; and this he told to the others. They, thinking
> that the way was pointed out to them by their enemies, attempted to
> rival them; and waiting till the very dead of night, they made the
> ascent, unnoticed not only by the sentinels, but also by the dogs
> which shared guard duty and formed the outpost, but then were overcome
> by sleep.
>
> Rome's Fortune, however, did not lack a voice capable of revealing and
> declaring such a great mischance. Sacred geese were kept near the
> temple of Juno for the service of the goddess. Now by nature this bird
> is easily disturbed and frightened by noise; and at this time, since
> they were neglected, because dire want oppressed the garrison, their
> sleep was light, and was made uncomfortable by hunger, with the result
> that they were at once aware of the enemy as they showed themselves
> above the edge of the cliff. The geese hissed at them and rushed at
> them impetuously, and at the sight of arms, became even more excited,
> and filled the place with piercing and discordant clamour. By this
> the Romans were aroused, and, when they comprehended what had
> happened, they forced back their enemies and hurled them over the
> precipice. And even to this day, in memory of these events, there are
> borne in solemn procession a dog impaled on a stake, but a goose
> perched in state upon a costly coverlet in a litter." - Plutarch, "On
> the Fortunes of The Romans" 11, 12
>
> "While those who had taken refuge on the Capitol were still being
> besieged, a youth who had been sent by the Romans from Veii to those
> on the Capitol and had escaped the notice of the Gauls who were on
> guard there, went up, delivered his message, and departed again by
> night. When it was day, one of the Gauls saw his tracks and reported
> it to the king, who called together the bravest of his men and showed
> them where the Roman had gone up, then asked them to display the same
> bravery as the Roman and attempt to ascend to the citadel, promising
> many gifts to those who should make the ascent. When many undertook to
> do so, he commanded the guards to remain quiet, in order that the
> Romans, supposing them to be asleep, might themselves turn to sleep.
> When the first men had now ascended and were waiting for those who
> lagged behind, in order that when their numbers were increased they
> might then slay the garrison and capture the stronghold, no mortal
> became aware of it; but some sacred geese of Juno which were being
> raised in the sanctuary, by making a clamour and at the same time
> rushing at the barbarians, gave notice of the peril. Thereupon there
> was confusion, shouting and rushing about on the part of all as they
> encouraged one another to take up arms; and the Gauls, whose numbers
> were now increased, advanced further inside." - Dionysius of
> Halicarnassus, "Roman Antiquities" XIII.7
>
> "While the Romans were in such throes, the neighbouring Tyrrhenians
> advanced and made a raid with a strong army on the territory of the
> Romans, capturing many prisoners and not a small amount of booty. But
> the Romans who had fled to Veii, falling unexpectedly upon the
> Tyrrhenians, put them to flight, took back the booty, and captured
> their camp. Having got possession of arms in abundance, they
> distributed them among the unarmed, and they also gathered men from
> the countryside and armed them, since they intended to relieve the
> siege of the soldiers who had taken refuge on the Capitoline. While
> they were at a loss how they might reveal their plans to the besieged,
> since the Celts had surrounded them with strong forces, a certain
> Cominius Pontius undertook to get the cheerful news to the men on the
> Capitoline. Starting out alone and swimming the river by night, he
> got unseen to a cliff of the Capitoline that was hard to climb and,
> hauling himself up it with difficulty, told the soldiers on the
> Capitoline about the troops that had been collected in Veii and how
> they were watching for an opportunity and would attack the Celts.
> Then, descending by the way he had mounted and swimming the Tiber, he
> returned to Veii. The Celts, when they observed the tracks of one who
> had recently climbed up, made plans to ascend at night by the same
> cliff. Consequently about the middle of the night, while the guards
> were neglectful of their watch because of the strength of the place,
> some Celts started an ascent of the cliff. They escaped detection by
> the guards, but the sacred geese of Hera, which were kept there,
> noticed the climbers and set up a cackling. The guards rushed to the
> place and the Celts deterred did not dare proceed farther. A certain
> Marcus Mallius, a man held in high esteem, rushing to the defence of
> the place, cut off the hand of the climber with his sword and,
> striking him on the breast with his shield, rolled him from the cliff.
> In like manner the second climber met his death, whereupon the rest
> all quickly turned in flight. But since the cliff was precipitous they
> were all hurled headlong and perished. As a result of this, when the
> Romans sent ambassadors to negotiate a peace, they were persuaded,
> upon receipt of one thousand pounds of gold, to leave the city and to
> withdraw from Roman territory." - Diodorus Siculus, The Library
> 14.CXVI.1-7
>
> Today is not the anniversary of the story of the sacred geese. I just
> like the story and it's an otherwise relatively quiet day in Roman
> history.
>
> Valete bene!
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> SOURCES
>
> Plutarch, Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Diodorus Siculus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50189 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS
-M. Hortensia G. Octavio et G. Equitio spd;
interesting discussion. I was just looking here
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lex_Salicia_iudiciaria_%28Nova_Roma%29
In the Tabularium.
Now this law concerns how the Praetor shall conduct a trial. It is
very thorough & here we have:
XII:
"The actor shall present evidence to back his demands, and then the
reus shall present evidence to back his defense. Evidence shall
consist of anything that is relevant to the case, including written
texts, visual evidence, and the statements of witnesses or experts.
In the case of statements, each party shall have the right to ask
questions of the witnesses and experts presented by the other
party. "

So the actors can present evidence & it discusses what comprises
evidence, but doesn't say a word about WHO can collect evidence.
So Gracchus can ask anyone for evidence, he can collect it for K.
Buteo without a problem.

Cato has gone too far in trying to impose limits, by adding
definitions, meaning other cives are not permitted , or is it only
Gracchus, to help the actors in the trial.
I don't think he can do this without the Comitia saying so.
bene valete
M. Hortensia Maior


> Salve Gai Equiti,
>
> > So, since under the lex Constitutiva I have imperium, I also
possess
> > potestas, under the lex Arminia Equitia de imperio.
>
> Agreed. But the Constitution says I have more "authority" than
you do,
> and by the definition of "authority", I believe that I can require
that
> you not interfere with the Censors' investigation.
>
> Vale, Octavius.
>
> --
> Marcus Octavius Gracchus
> octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com
>
> -"Apes don't read philosophy."
> -"Yes they do, Otto, they just don't understand it! Let me correct
> you on a few things: Aristotle was not Belgian. The central
message of
> Buddhism is not 'every man for himself'. And the London
Underground is
> not a political movement! Those are all mistakes. I looked them
up."
> -from "A Fish Called Wanda"
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50190 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2007-05-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS
Cn. Iulius Caesar M. Hortensiae Maiori sal.

If you stopped to think about matters before firing off posts, it
should have become clear, to even you, that this call for evidence
against Quintus Fabius Maximus has nothing to do with the now defunct
trial.

It is obviously the prelude, under the terms of the Section II.C Lex
Popillia senatoria, to his removal from the Senate. It had nothing to
do with gathering evidence for the defence.

All things considered it is probably fortunate that you no longer
practise law macronationally, for it is this sort of impulsive
rambling that would likely condemn any of your clients to an
ignominious defeat.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> -M. Hortensia G. Octavio et G. Equitio spd;
> interesting discussion. I was just looking here
> http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lex_Salicia_iudiciaria_%28Nova_Roma%29
> In the Tabularium.
> Now this law concerns how the Praetor shall conduct a trial. It is
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50191 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS
Maior Iulio Quiritibusque spd;
I posted as it was a pretty question, just what are Cato's
powers as praetor in conducting a trial? From rereading the
material, it seemed as if he thought Gracchus was asking for
information for the trial [I am not privy to the Senate list].
Even if I am wrong & Cato knew about the investigation by the
Censor, if you read the law about the praetor's duties & the iudex.
Here it is:

"If the praetor considers that some of the iudices thus appointed
are obviously related by ties of interest to one of the parties,
then the praetor shall, at his own discretion, dismiss those iudices
and cast lots to appoint different iudices from the album iudicum. "

The above is quite explicit & there is nothing there about
influence, prejudice, poisoning the iudex pool etc.. So Cato's
actions are beyond the law.

Finally, I don't see the reason or the necessity to insult me
personally when I am having an interesting discussion with others on
the ML.
M. Hortensia Maior
producer 'Vox Romana' podcast
http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/

> If you stopped to think about matters before firing off posts, it
> should have become clear, to even you, that this call for evidence
> against Quintus Fabius Maximus has nothing to do with the now
defunct
> trial.
>
> It is obviously the prelude, under the terms of the Section II.C
Lex
> Popillia senatoria, to his removal from the Senate. It had nothing
to
> do with gathering evidence for the defence.
>
> All things considered it is probably fortunate that you no longer
> practise law macronationally, for it is this sort of impulsive
> rambling that would likely condemn any of your clients to an
> ignominious defeat.
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > -M. Hortensia G. Octavio et G. Equitio spd;
> > interesting discussion. I was just looking here
> > http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lex_Salicia_iudiciaria_%28Nova_Roma%29
> > In the Tabularium.
> > Now this law concerns how the Praetor shall conduct a trial. It
is
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50192 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2007-05-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS
Cn. Iulius Caesar M. Hortensiae Maiori sal.

Cato knew full well what the real meaning of the call for evidence was.
I also am not privy to the Senate list, but I knew imemdiately I read
the post what the issue was.

As for insulting you, a factual observation is hardly that, and as the
great advocate for Republican debate it hardly behoves you to complain
about insults, especially as that is the all too short conclusion for
most of your "debates".


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Maior Iulio Quiritibusque spd;
> I posted as it was a pretty question, just what are Cato's
> powers as praetor in conducting a trial? From rereading the
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50193 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-05
Subject: a.d. III Non. Mai.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem III Nonas Maias; haec dies comitialis est.

"Curved Lyra would follow Centaurus, but the path's
Not clear: the third night will be the right time." - Ovid, Fasti V

"Their queen herself [Kalliope] sinks her head upon the silent lyre,
as when after Orpheus' loss she halted by thy stream, O Hebrus, and
gazed at the troops of beasts that listened no more, and the woods
that moved not since the strains were gone." - Statius, Silvae 5.3.15

"The first images of the Mousai [the Muses] are of them all, from the
hand of Kephisodotos, while a little farther on are three, also from
the hand of Kephisodotos, and three more by Strongylion...the
remaining three were made by Olympiosthenes...by the side of Orpheus
stands a statue of Telete, and around him are beasts of stone and
bronze listening to his singing...Orpheus was a son of the Mousa
Kalliope...the beasts followed him fascinated by his songs, and that
he went down alive to Hades to ask for his wife from the gods below."
- Pausanias, Guide to Greece 9.30.1

"Orpheus, borne, so the story goes, by Kalliope herself to her
Thrakian lover Oiagros near the heights of Pimplea. They say that with
the music of his voice he enchanted stubborn mountain rocks and
rushing streams." - Apollonius Rhodius, Argonautica 1.24

"Lyre: Orpheus, son of Calliope and Oeagrus...When Orpheus was taking
delight in song, seated, as many say, on Mount Olympus...Liber
[Dionysos] is said to have roused the Bacchanals against him. They
slew him and dismembered his body. But others say that this happened
because he had looked on the rites of Liber. The Musae gathered the
scattered limbs and gave them burial, and as the greatest favour they
could confer, they put as a memorial his lyre, pictured with stars,
among the constellations. Apollo and Jove consented, for Orpheus had
praised Apollo highly, and Jupiter granted this favour to his
daughter." - Hyginus, Astronomica 2.7

Older maps of the sky show a bird, especially a vulture (Vultur
cadens), in this position, since in early times the constellation and
its stars, were taken to resemble one. As such, together with other
constellations in the Zodiacal sign of Sagittarius (specifically,
Cygnus, Aquila and Sagittarius itself), Lyra may be a significant part
of the origin of the myth of the Stymphalian Birds, one of The Twelve
Labors of Herakles.

By taking into account nearly parallel lines of fainter stars in the
centre of the constellation, it appears to resemble a lyre, and
consequently Lyra gradually shifted from being considered a vulture to
being considered a lyre; for a while, it was even regarded as a
vulture holding a lyre. Associated with its identity as a lyre, Lyra
was considered to be the lyre used by Orpheus to produce music that
charmed even Hades, and which was placed into the stars upon his
death. Orpheus was the son of the god Apollo and the Muse Calliope.
He was presented by his father with a Lyre and taught to play upon it,
which he did to such perfection that nothing could withstand the charm
of his music. Not only his fellow-mortals but wild beasts were
softened by his strains, and gathering round him laid by their
fierceness, and stood entranced with his music.

When his wife Euridice died, he determined to bring her back from
Hades, the Underword. Using his musical talents, he charmed his way
past Cerberus, the three-headed watch dog. Charon, the boat-man of the
Styx ferried Orpheus across the river free of charge. Even Hades cried
iron tears who granted Orpheus' plea that he be allowed to take
Eurydice back with him, provided that he promise not to look at her
until they reached home. Orpheus played and sang while Eurydice
followed but overcome with fear he turned back to see if she was
there. She was. Instantly faded away to become once again only a
shade. When Orpheus tried to re-enter Hades, his way was barred. He
returned to Thrace and served in the temple of Apollo. He soon met his
death. He was torn to pieces either by local maidens or raging Maenads
following Dionysus. They threw his head in the Hebrus river. Calliope,
a muse and his mother, took the pieces of Orpheus' body and buried
them at the foot of Mt. Olympus.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Hyginus, Apollodorus Rhodius, Statius, Pausanias, Bullfinch's
"Mythology"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50194 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-05-05
Subject: ATTN Cybernautae: Re: Latin pronunciation - Romanian latin
> > We could even maintain an audio repository in MP3 format.
> > Question, amice Agricola, how do we get there?
> >
> > Valete Omnes
> > A. Liburnius
> >

Agricola Omnibus sal.

Sorry I have been away and missed this question. The wiki is not now
configured to permit uploads of MP3s, but I am sure that a simple
change of configuration will fix that. Let's bring this point over to
the NRWiki mailing list. We should look at permitting MP3s and PDFs

Optime valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50195 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2007-05-05
Subject: Re: EDICTA CENSORIS et PRAETORIS
P. Memmius Albucius Magistratibus omn.que s.d.

It is no doubt, legally speaking, that at the same time, a praetor
may organize a judicial action concerning a citizen X and a citizen
Y, and a censor may open an information against one of them. It may
be seen as confusing, but it is legal.

I hope that each of the high magistrates here involved will fully
understand this point and not prevent the other one to fulfill his
duty.

Now that the judicial action seems to be closed, things will be
easied.

The second point, far more interesting now, is to know whether words
and speeches pronounced inside a not-public assembly, here the
Senate, could fall in the scope of censorial powers.

As well remind it Censor Octavius, censores are fully competent « to
safeguard the public morality and honor through the collegial
administering of notae ».

« The Nota investigation, precises our censor, was launched as a
result of a threat of physical
violence against [snip] by [snip], made on the Senate list this
morning, and is independent of any other matter
between these citizens. »

The wise magistrates here concerned will have to ask to which extent
the freedom of speech which largely makes the Senate what it is, is
limited by certain rules, specially the quoted Section IV.A.1.f.'s
one. No doubt that the « public » qualification (`public morality')
will be the second key issue here : are Senate's debates *public*, so
that they could possibly attempt to `public morality' ?

Then, it is interesting, to remind that, whatever decision be taken
on the Senate case, a nota could be fed by any other `wrongdoings',
even with no relation to the Senate dispute.

Last, our constitution, as the ancient Rome did, authorizes and asks
the censores « to maintain the album senatorum (list of Senators),
including the power to add and remove names on that list according to
qualifications set by law ».

Valete Magistratus omnesque,


P. Memmius Albucius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50196 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: prid. Non. Mai.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est pridie Nonas Maias; haec dies comitialis est.

"Scorpio's mid-part will be visible in the sky
When we speak of the Nones dawning tomorrow." - Ovid, Fasti V

"Hesiod says that ... Orion went away to Krete and spent his time
hunting in company with Artemis and Leto. It seems that he threatened
to kill every beast there was on earth; whereupon, in her anger, Ge
(the Earth) sent up against him a Scorpion of very great size by which
he was stung and so perished. After this Zeus, at the prayer of
Artemis and Leto, put him among the stars, because of his manliness,
and the Scorpion also as a memorial of him and of what had occurred."
- Hesiod, The Astronomy Fragment 4 (from Pseudo-Eratosthenes
Catasterismi Fragment 32)

"Scorpio: This sign is divided into two parts on account of the great
spread of the claws. One part of it our writers have called the
Balance (Libra). But the whole was put in the sky, its is said, for
the following reason: Orion, since he used to hunt, and felt confident
that he was most skilled of all in that pursuit, said even to Diana
and Latona that he was able to kill anything the earth produced.
Tellus, angered at this, sent the Scorpion which is said to have
killed him. Jove, however, admiring the courage of both, put the
Scorpion among the stars, as a lesson to men not to be too
self-confident. Diana, then, because of her affection for Orion, asked
Jove to show to her request the same favour he had given of his own
accord to Tellus. And so the constellation was established in such a
way that when Scorpion rises, Orion sets." - Hyginus, Astronomica 2.26

"Artemis slew Orion on Delos. He was said to be a Gigas of massive
proportions born of Ge, but Pherekdes says that his parents were
Poseidon and Euryale. From Poseidon he was given the power of walking
across the sea. His first wife was Side, who for vying with Hera in
shapeliness was thrown by her into Haides' realm. After that Orion
went to Khios where he courted Oinopion's daughter Merope. Oinopion,
however, got him drunk, and, as he slept, blinded him and tossed him
out on the beach. He made his way to the bronze workshop of
Hephaistos, where he seized a boy, set him on his shoulders, and
ordered him to guide him toward the east. Once there, he looked up and
was completely healed by the rays of Helios (the Sun). Immediately he
started back to confront Oinopion. But Poseidon had provided Oinopion
with a house beneath the earth, built by Hephaistos. Meanwhile, Eos,
whom Aphrodite taunted with constant passion as punishment for
sleeping with Ares, fell in love with Orion and took him off with her
to Delos. There he was killed, according to some, for challenging
Artemis to a discus match. Others say that Artemis shot him as he was
forcing his attention on Opis, a virgin who had come from the
Hyperboreans." - Apollodorus, The Library 1.25

In very ancient astrology - Egyptian, Chaldean and Hebrew - Scorpio
was represented not by the familiar scorpion, but by the serpent.
This is a profound symbol which tells us a lot about Scorpio.
Firstly, the serpent sheds his skin cynically, and was thought by the
ancients to be immortal and capable of constant self-renewal. Now
this pattern of outgrowing a skin, sloughing it and growing a new one
runs through Scorpio's life. Often his life breaks up into distinct
chapters, as he moves through one cycle after another. All come to
ultimate destruction. Then he rebuilds and starts again.

According to Greek mythology, it corresponds to the scorpion which was
sent by Gaia (or possibly the goddess Hera) to kill the hunter Orion,
the scorpion rising out of the ground at the goddess' command to
attack. Although the scorpion and Orion appear together in this myth,
the constellation of Orion is almost opposite to Scorpius in the night
sky. It has been suggested that this was a divine precaution to
forestall the heavenly continuation of the feud.

In many versions, however, Apollo sent the scorpion after Orion,
having grown jealous of Artemis' attentions to the man. Some
variations of this myth say that it succeeded, others say that Orion
tried to escape by swimming out to sea only to be accidentally shot by
Artemis, the goddess of the hunt and Apollo's sister. Artemis, who
unsurprisingly, was very attracted to Orion, had fired her arrow in an
attempt to kill the scorpion that was attacking Orion. Being a
magnificent shot, she struck the black head that she saw bobbing in
the water with her first arrow. Of course, the black object she fired
upon was NOT the scorpion, but Orion himself. Later, to apologize for
killing his friend, Apollo then helped Artemis hang Orion's image in
the night sky. However, the scorpion was also placed up there, and
every time it appears on the horizon, Orion starts to sink into the
other side of the sky, still running from the attacker.

Scorpius also appears in one version of the story of Phaethon, the
mortal son of Helios, the sun. Phaeton asked to drive the sun-chariot
for a day. Phaeton lost control of the chariot. The horses, already
out of control, were scared by the great celestial scorpion with its
sting raised to strike, and the inexperienced boy lost control of the
chariot, as the sun wildly went about the sky (this is said to have
formed the constellation Eridanus). Finally, Zeus struck him down with
a thunderbolt to stop the rampage.

At the heart of the Scorpion lies the star Antares - meaning
"anti-Mars", so called because you can easily confuse this reddish
star with the planet Mars which is currently situated just beneath the
constellation, fortunately shining much brighter than Antares.
Antares, a red supergiant, is 520 light-years away from us and is
9,000 times more luminous than our Sun! It is not very dense however
and has a mass of only 10 to 15 times that of the Sun.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Hesiod, Hyginus, Apollodorus, Wikipedia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50197 From: Lucius Arminius Faustus Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: Call for rogatores
L. Arminius Faustus CSL to all quirites,

Citizens, there still a vacancy for the office of rogator. If any
citizen desires to serve NR, announce the candidature on this list and
CC it to me.

The dead-line of the calling will be the ides of May (15th May).

If we have a candidate and if the auspices be favourable, I intend to
call the Comitia for the days comitialis after 17th May. I will
announce it on the right time.

--
Valete bene in pacem deorum,
L. Arminius Faustus

"Vigilando, agendo, bene consulendo, prospera omnia cedunt" - Salustius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50198 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: IVS IVRANDVM - OATH OF OFFICE
Quiritibus S.P.D.

Ego, Lucius Iunius Bassus, hac re ipsa decus Novae Romae me defensurum, et semper pro
populo senatuque Novae Romae acturum esse sollemniter IVRO.

Ego, Lucius Iunius Bassus, officio Propraetor Provincia California Novae Romae accepto,
Deos Deasque Romae in omnibus meae vitae publicae temporibus culturum, et virtutes
Romanas publica privataque vita me persecuturum esse IVRO.

Ego, Lucius Iunius Bassus, Religioni Romanae me fauturum et eam defensurum, et
numquam contra eius statum publicum me acturum esse, ne quid detrimenti capiat IVRO.

Ego, Lucius Iunius Bassus officiis muneris Propraetor me quam optime functurum esse
praeterea IVRO.

Meo civis Novae Romae honore, coram Deis Deabusque Populi Romani, et voluntate
favoreque eorum, ego munus Propraetor Provincia California una cum iuribus, privilegiis,
muneribus et officiis comitantibus ACCIPIO.

Datum sub manu mea, PRID. NON. MAI. MMDCCLX a.u.c., L. Arminio Faustis et Ti. Galerio
Paulinis Consulibus

----------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Lucius Iunius Bassus, do hereby solemnly swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and
to act always in the best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Lucius Iunius Bassus, swear to honor the Gods and
Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public
and private life.

I, Lucius Iunius Bassus, swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State
Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as
the State Religion.

I, Lucius Iunius Bassus, swear to protect and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Lucius Iunius Bassus, further swear to fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the
office of Propraetor Provincia California to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the
Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor,
do I accept the position of Propraetor Provincia California and all the rights,
privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.

Sworn this day, May 6th, 2760 a.u.c., in the consulship of L. Arminius Faustus and Ti.
Galerius Paulinus.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
VALETE,

L. IVNIVS BASSVS
PROPRAETOR PROVINCIA CALIFORNIA
MAGISTER SODALITAS LATINITATIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50199 From: Joe Geranio Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: Julio Claudian Art, Roman Portraiture and Coins
Julio Claudian Art, Roman Portraiture and Coins


For over 1,450 photos of Julio Claudian Portraits, Sculptures,
Numismatics and Archaeological sites all from the Julio Claudian
Dynasty go to:

http://flickr.com/groups/93273909@N00/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50200 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: Re: IVS IVRANDVM - OATH OF OFFICE
M. Hortensia L. Iunio Basso spd;
many congratulations to you Basse. It will be great to
see California prosper as a provincia again! I was Propraetrix of
Hibernia & it was a tough job but worth it.
may Fortuna be propitious to you
M. Hortensia Maior


> Ego, Lucius Iunius Bassus officiis muneris Propraetor me quam
optime functurum esse
> praeterea IVRO.
>
> Meo civis Novae Romae honore, coram Deis Deabusque Populi Romani,
et voluntate
> favoreque eorum, ego munus Propraetor Provincia California una cum
iuribus, privilegiis,
> muneribus et officiis comitantibus ACCIPIO.
>
> Datum sub manu mea, PRID. NON. MAI. MMDCCLX a.u.c., L. Arminio
Faustis et Ti. Galerio
> Paulinis Consulibus
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>
> I, Lucius Iunius Bassus, do hereby solemnly swear to uphold the
honor of Nova Roma, and
> to act always in the best interests of the people and the Senate
of Nova Roma.
>
> As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Lucius Iunius Bassus, swear to
honor the Gods and
> Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman
Virtues in my public
> and private life.
>
> I, Lucius Iunius Bassus, swear to uphold and defend the Religio
Romana as the State
> Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would
threaten its status as
> the State Religion.
>
> I, Lucius Iunius Bassus, swear to protect and defend the
Constitution of Nova Roma.
>
> I, Lucius Iunius Bassus, further swear to fulfill the obligations
and responsibilities of the
> office of Propraetor Provincia California to the best of my
abilities.
>
> On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the
> Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor,
> do I accept the position of Propraetor Provincia California and
all the rights,
> privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.
>
> Sworn this day, May 6th, 2760 a.u.c., in the consulship of L.
Arminius Faustus and Ti.
> Galerius Paulinus.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
---
> VALETE,
>
> L. IVNIVS BASSVS
> PROPRAETOR PROVINCIA CALIFORNIA
> MAGISTER SODALITAS LATINITATIS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50201 From: Thomas Fulmer Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: Re: Call for rogatores
On 5/6/07, Lucius Arminius Faustus <lafaustus@...> wrote:
> Citizens, there still a vacancy for the office of rogator. If any
> citizen desires to serve NR, announce the candidature on this list and
> CC it to me.
>

Salvete Quirites,

I had been considering running for such an office next year, but quite
frankly this office has remained vacant far too long. I cannot in good
conscious ignore this call. It is our sacred duty to serve the
republic, especially in times of need. As such, I declare my candidacy
for rogator to the honorable Consuls Faustus and Paulinus in the
presence of all citizens assembled here in the forum.

I make no claims at being the best man for this job, I claim only to
be willing to serve and willing to learn.

I hope I will not be the only candidate for office, a republic only
works when the people have a choice. The choice encourages debate and
forces people to take an interest in the political process. The more
involvement in our republic that all citizens are, the better it will
be for all of us.

Long live the Republic,

--Ti Octavius Avitus

--
Men are haunted by the vastness of eternity.
And so we ask ourselves: will our actions
echo across centuries?
Will strangers hear our names long after
we are gone, and wonder who we were,
how bravely we fought, how fiercely we loved?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50202 From: Mary Caldwell Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: Re: IVS IVRANDVM - OATH OF OFFICE
Salve Basse!

Congratulations on your appointment! I, for one, look forward to serving
with you in California to revitalize our province! Many blessings be upon
you!

Optime vale,

Lucia Caecilia Marcella

_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Lucius Iunius Bassus
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 10:38 AM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] IVS IVRANDVM - OATH OF OFFICE

Quiritibus S.P.D.

Ego, Lucius Iunius Bassus, hac re ipsa decus Novae Romae me defensurum, et
semper pro
populo senatuque Novae Romae acturum esse sollemniter IVRO.

Ego, Lucius Iunius Bassus, officio Propraetor Provincia California Novae
Romae accepto,
Deos Deasque Romae in omnibus meae vitae publicae temporibus culturum, et
virtutes
Romanas publica privataque vita me persecuturum esse IVRO.

Ego, Lucius Iunius Bassus, Religioni Romanae me fauturum et eam defensurum,
et
numquam contra eius statum publicum me acturum esse, ne quid detrimenti
capiat IVRO.

Ego, Lucius Iunius Bassus officiis muneris Propraetor me quam optime
functurum esse
praeterea IVRO.

Meo civis Novae Romae honore, coram Deis Deabusque Populi Romani, et
voluntate
favoreque eorum, ego munus Propraetor Provincia California una cum iuribus,
privilegiis,
muneribus et officiis comitantibus ACCIPIO.

Datum sub manu mea, PRID. NON. MAI. MMDCCLX a.u.c., L. Arminio Faustis et
Ti. Galerio
Paulinis Consulibus

----------------------------------------------------------

I, Lucius Iunius Bassus, do hereby solemnly swear to uphold the honor of
Nova Roma, and
to act always in the best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova
Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Lucius Iunius Bassus, swear to honor the
Gods and
Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in
my public
and private life.

I, Lucius Iunius Bassus, swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as
the State
Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten
its status as
the State Religion.

I, Lucius Iunius Bassus, swear to protect and defend the Constitution of
Nova Roma.

I, Lucius Iunius Bassus, further swear to fulfill the obligations and
responsibilities of the
office of Propraetor Provincia California to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the
Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor,
do I accept the position of Propraetor Provincia California and all the
rights,
privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.

Sworn this day, May 6th, 2760 a.u.c., in the consulship of L. Arminius
Faustus and Ti.
Galerius Paulinus.

----------------------------------------------------------
VALETE,

L. IVNIVS BASSVS
PROPRAETOR PROVINCIA CALIFORNIA
MAGISTER SODALITAS LATINITATIS



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50203 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM GAI EQUITI CATONI PRAETORIS--A question, please?
I am not sure if I understand something about the matter between Maximus and
Quintilianus. Did Quintilianus offer his alleged insult of Maximus during a
discussion that was confined to the Senate list? Because the first I read
of it was on the Senate list and it could only have been made public if a
Senator posted it to the main list. I want to be totally sure what list the
incident occurred in. Thank you.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
Tribunus Plebis



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50204 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM GAI EQUITI CATONI PRAETORIS--A question, please?
Cato Fl. Galerio Aureliano sal.

Salve, tribune.

The words were spoken on the Senate floor; the putative actor quoted
these words in his petitio to the praetors, putting them in the Forum.

One thing, though: the supposed "seal" on the proceedings of the
Senate is a custom, not a law; it is an official List of the Republic,
and therefore belongs to the res publica.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50205 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS--Point of common sense, please?
Hmm. Q. Fabius Maximus lives in provincia California. Caeso Fabius Buteo
Quintilianus lives in provincia
Thule. The supposed threat occurred on a Senate list that only Senatores
and Tribunes are supposed to have access to until the Tribunes and the Senate
issue the final deliberations of the Senate as decided by a consultum. Did
any members of the Senate happen to exercise a bit of common sense and suggest
that Maximus (if an actual threat of violence actually did occur) might want
to withdraw his threat & issue a simple personal apology? Did any members
of the Senate suggest that the threat is pretty much empty unless Maximus was
prepared to spend thousands of dollars to go to Thule, commit an act that
would almost surely guarantee his arrest, and then spend thousands more dollars
to deal with the matter? Is anyone involved in this matter, Senators or
Censores or Praetores, at all concerned that words posted in the heat of an
internet discussion could be settled amicably without making the matter public on
the ML?

Just asking, of course. (And giggling hysterically about the silliness of
it all).

Excuse me. As a Tribune, I am sworn to support and protect the Constitution
and by-laws of Nova Roma in both the letter and the spirit. Regardless of
how ridiculous I may personally feel about it.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus,
Tribunus Plebis



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50206 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-06
Subject: Re: EDICTUM GAI EQUITI CATONI PRAETORIS--A question, please?
Actually, there is also a tradition that a duplicate of the records of the
Senate be deposited in the Temple of Ceres but I never had a copy forwarded to
me when I was merely the flamen Cerialis.

However, please remember that this is Nova Roma and the by-laws of this
organization do not always follow the laws and traditions of Old Rome.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50207 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS--Point of common sense, please?
-M.Hortensia Fl. Galerio spd:
yes it was pretty funny that Maximus' own petitio put
about the very remark which he claimed was hurting his dignitas;-)
As for threats, well was he the one who threatened to blow
up Scaevola's boat or was that somebody else? I cannot remember.
bene vale
Maior


> Hmm. Q. Fabius Maximus lives in provincia California. Caeso
Fabius Buteo
> Quintilianus lives in provincia
> Thule. The supposed threat occurred on a Senate list that only
Senatores
> and Tribunes are supposed to have access to until the Tribunes and
the Senate
> issue the final deliberations of the Senate as decided by a
consultum. Did
> any members of the Senate happen to exercise a bit of common
sense and suggest
> that Maximus (if an actual threat of violence actually did occur)
might want
> to withdraw his threat & issue a simple personal apology? Did
any members
> of the Senate suggest that the threat is pretty much empty unless
Maximus was
> prepared to spend thousands of dollars to go to Thule, commit an
act that
> would almost surely guarantee his arrest, and then spend
thousands more dollars
> to deal with the matter? Is anyone involved in this matter,
Senators or
> Censores or Praetores, at all concerned that words posted in the
heat of an
> internet discussion could be settled amicably without making the
matter public on
> the ML?
>
> Just asking, of course. (And giggling hysterically about the
silliness of
> it all).
>
> Excuse me. As a Tribune, I am sworn to support and protect the
Constitution
> and by-laws of Nova Roma in both the letter and the spirit.
Regardless of
> how ridiculous I may personally feel about it.
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus,
> Tribunus Plebis
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's free at
http://www.aol.com
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50208 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-05-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS--Point of common sense, please?
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica M. Hortensiae Maiori Flavio Galerio Aureliano
> quiritibus s.d.
>
>
> -M.Hortensia Fl. Galerio spd:
> yes it was pretty funny that Maximus' own petitio put
> about the very remark which he claimed was hurting his dignitas;-
>
> ATS: We posted only what we received...
>
> As for threats, well was he the one who threatened to blow
> up Scaevola's boat or was that somebody else? I
>
> ATS: ahem...there seems to be some confusion here. QFM threatened CFBQ,
> whereas in his own opinion, QFM was insulted by CFBQ. CFBQ did NOT threaten
> QFM. There have been some very interesting comments made by others on that
> list of late, too, as well as something resembling a logical fallacy which
> appeared in a quoted source. The petitio had to do with the tender
> sensibilities of QFM being insulted by some things CFBQ said, whereas the
> investigation by Octavius has to do with threats of physical violence against
> CFBQ made by QFM. Have we got this straight now? These are two separate, but
> related, incidents, requiring very different procedures in dealing with them.
>
>
> cannot remember.
>
> ATS: Now, that you should recall; it¹s mentioned often enough.
> More comments interleaved below.
>
> bene vale
> Maior
>
>> > Hmm. Q. Fabius Maximus lives in provincia California. Caeso
> Fabius Buteo
>> > Quintilianus lives in provincia
>> > Thule. The supposed threat occurred on a Senate list that only
> Senatores
>> > and Tribunes are supposed to have access to until the Tribunes and
> the Senate
>> > issue the final deliberations of the Senate as decided by a
> consultum. Did
>> > any members of the Senate happen to exercise a bit of common
> sense and suggest
>> > that Maximus (if an actual threat of violence actually did occur)
>
> ATS: It did...have you read the list?
>
>
> might want
>> > to withdraw his threat & issue a simple personal apology? Did
> any members
>> > of the Senate suggest that the threat is pretty much empty unless
> Maximus was
>> > prepared to spend thousands of dollars to go to Thule, commit an
> act that
>> > would almost surely guarantee his arrest, and then spend
> thousands more dollars
>> > to deal with the matter?
>
> ATS: It may not be as empty as you think. Word has it that QFM is not
> lacking in sufficient spare cash for that sort of adventure. Now, he might
> have been blowing off steam, but the possibility that he was not still exists.
> One must also remember that the perpetrators of that sort of thing seem to
> fall into the loving arms of the law all too seldom.
>
>
> Is anyone involved in this matter,
> Senators or
>> > Censores or Praetores, at all concerned that words posted in the
> heat of an
>> > internet discussion could be settled amicably without making the
> matter public on
>> > the ML?
>
> ATS: We are bound to deal with petitiones within a specified time frame.
> The law allows very few exceptions to acceptance, so it had to be accepted,
> which in turn required the posting of the notice and the formula. That is our
> law, and we obey it. Unlike some of our Cheshire-cat magistrates and
> magisterial candidates, we believe in performing our duty.
>> >
>> > Just asking, of course. (And giggling hysterically about the
> silliness of
>> > it all).
>> >
>> > Excuse me. As a Tribune, I am sworn to support and protect the
> Constitution
>> > and by-laws of Nova Roma in both the letter and the spirit.
> Regardless of
>> > how ridiculous I may personally feel about it.
>
> ATS: I for one don¹t consider obedience to NR laws as silly, though
> obedience to some in the macro world certainly is. Those of us who are of a
> more philosophical temperament and don¹t require laws to keep us behaving
> properly tend to look on some of those as being silly in their own right, but
> our laws are necessary guideposts for dealing with a far-flung and diverse
> group.
>
> Was last year¹s In Scaevolam silly, tua sententia? In Ap. Claudium
> Priscum?
>> >
>> > Fl. Galerius Aurelianus,
>> > Tribunus Plebis
>> >
Valete,

A. Tullia Scholastica,
Praetrix


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50209 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-07
Subject: Non. Mai.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est Nonis Maiis; haec dies fastus est.

"On the forty-eighth day after the vernal equinox, when the rising of
the Pleiades takes place, the bee swarms begin to increase in strength
and number." - Columella

"The Pleiades whose stars are these: - 'Lovely Teygata, and dark-faced
Elektra, and Alkyone, and bright Asterope, and Kelaino, and Maia, and
Merope, whom glorious Atlas begot ... In the mountains of Kyllene she
[Maia] bare Hermes, the herald of the gods." - Hesiod, Astronomy
Fragment 1 (from Scholiast on Pindar's Nemean Odea 2.16)

"To Atlas and Okeanos' daughter Pleione were born (on Arkadian
Kyllene) seven daughters called the Pleiades, whose names are Alkyone,
Merope, Kelaino, Elektra, Sterope, Taygete, and Maia. Of these,
Oinomaus married Sterope, and Sisyphos married Merope. Poseidon slept
with two of them: first with Kelaino, fathering Lykos, whom Poseidon
settled in the Islands of the Blest; and then with Alkyone, who bore
him a daughter Aithusa (the mother with Apollon of Eleuther), and sons
Hyrieus and Lykos Â… Zeus also slept with the other Atlantides." -
Apollodorus, The Library 3.110-111

"These [the twelve Horai] came down from heaven, for Memnon wailing
wild and high; and mourned with these the Pleiades. Echoed round
far-stretching mountains, and Aisepos' stream. Ceaseless uprose the
keen, and in their midst, fallen on her son and clasping, wailed Eos."
- Quintus Smyrnaeus, Fall of Troy 2.549

"At the base of these mountains, on the seaboard, are two caves. One
is the cave of the nymphs called Anigriades; the other is the scene of
the stories of the daughters of Atlas [Pleiades] and of the birth of
Dardanos." - Strabo, Geography 8.3.19

"The Pleiades (Many) were so named, according to Musaeaus, because
fifteen daughters were born to Atlas and Aethra, daughter of Oceanus.
Five of them are called Hyades, he shows, because their brother was
Hyas, a youth dearly beloved by his sisters. When he was killed in a
lion hunt, the five we have mentioned, given over to continual
lamentation, are said to have perished. Because they grieved
exceedingly at his death, they are called Hyades.

The remaining ten brooded over the death of their sisters, and brought
death on themselves; because so may experienced the same grief, they
were called Pleiades. Alexander says they were called Hyades because
they were daughters of Hyas and Boeotia, Pleiades, because born of
Pleio, daughter of Oceanus, and Atlas.

The Pleiades are called seven in number, but only six can be seen.
This reason has been advanced, that of the seven, six mated with
immortals (three with Jove, two with Neptunus, and one with Mars); the
seventh was said to have been the wife of Sisyphus. From Electra and
Jove, Dardanus was born; from Maia and Jove, Mercurius; from Taygete
and Jove, Ladedaemon; from Alcyone and Neptunus, Hyrieus; from Celaeno
and Neptunus, Lycus and Nycteus. Mars by Sterope begat Oenomaus, but
others call her the wife of Oenomaus. Merope, wed to Sisyphus, bore
Glaucus, who, as many say, was the father of Bellerophon. On account
of her other sisters she was placed among the constellations, but
because she married a mortal, her star is dim. Others say Electra does
not appear because the Pleiades are thought to lead the circling dance
for the stars, but after Troy was captured and her descendants through
Dardanus overthrown, moved by grief she left them and took her place
in the circle called Arctic. From this she appears, in grief for such
a long time, with her hair unbound, that, because of this, she is
called a comet. But ancient astronomers placed these Pleiades,
daughters of Pleione and Atlas, as we have said, apart from the Bull.
When Pleione once was travelling through Boeotia with her daughters,
Orion, who was accompanying her, tried to attack her. She escaped, but
Orion sought her for seven years and couldn't find her. Jove, pitying
the girls, appointed a way to the stars, and later, by some
astronomers, they were called the Bull's tail. And so up to this time
Orion seems to be following them as they flee towards the west. Our
writers call these stars Vergiliae, because they rise after spring.
They have still greater honour than the others, too, because their
rising is a sign of summer, their setting of winter - a thing is not
true of the other constellations." - Hyginus, Astronomica 2.21

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Columella, Hyginus, Strabo, Apollodorus, Quintus Smyrnaeus, Hesiod
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50210 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS--Point of common sense, please?
Cato Fl. Galerio Aureliano sal.

Salve tribune.

Well, the only words regarding this whole affair from the Senate floor
so far published on this List were those of C. Fabius Buteo
Quintilianus, calling Quintus Fabius Maximus "arrogant" and
incompetent" - and again, only within the context of the petitio.
Nothing about threats or violence.

I am of two minds: one as praetor and one as citizen. As praetors, my
colleague and I felt bound by the law to admit the petitio and begin
the legal process; after all, that's what it's there for. As a
citizen, I'm not really sure that the whole question of calumniae
really should even be part of our law. It's completely un-Roman and
while not silly per se, is a less than dazzling bit of legal ballet.

But, to paraphrase Cicero, "it's tough, but that's the law".

Vale bene,

Cato

P.S. - can you put a word in with Ceres? Her daughter should be back
by now, but it's still cold in NYC. GEC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50211 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-05-07
Subject: Nova Roma Taxes Due, 5/7/2007, 12:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Nova Roma Taxes Due
 
Date:   Monday May 7, 2007
Time:   12:00 pm - 1:00 pm
Repeats:   This event repeats every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday until Thursday May 31, 2007.
Notes:   The Tax Edict (rates, address, other info) is at http://novaroma.org/nr/Tax_rate_%28Nova_Roma%29

NEW! Pay through the Album Civium!

* 1. log in at Album Civium ( http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album )
* 2. go to My Account
* 3. go to "make payment"
* 4. add citizens to the list if paying for multiple citizens
* 5. choose pay pal or check
* 6. if choosing pay pal, continue through pay pal until it sends you back to My Account
* 7. if choosing check, print and mail

 
Copyright © 2007  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50212 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-05-07
Subject: Re: Call for rogatores
Cn. Lentulus Rogator Ti. Octavio Avito Rgatori Candidato s. p. d.:


I fully support your candidacy, Tiberi Octavi! I need very much a colleague Rogator, because I cannot work legally for months without a colleague.

Thank you very much for your candidacy.



Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
R O G A T O R
-------------------------------
Propraetor Provinciae Pannoniae
Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
Accensus Consulis Ti. Galerii Paulini
Scriba Aedilis Curulis Iuliae Caesaris Cytheridis Aeges
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae A. Tulliae Scholasticae
-------------------------------
Decurio I. Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Dominus Factionis Russatae
Latinista, Classicus Philologus


---------------------------------

---------------------------------
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50213 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-07
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CENSORIS--Point of common sense, please?
M. Hortensiae A. Tulliae Fl. Galerio quiritibusque s.d.
yes, I was speaking of Q. Fabius Maximus' alleged threat to
K. Fabius Quintillianus Buteo & remembered that Maximus had
physically threatened another civis in the past, Scaevola. Scaevola
is a physically impressive person, a big, tall fellow in his prime,
mid- 30's wo was born in Moscow, no 'delicate' lily' he & he
contacted the FBI, police etc.

Actually, since the Senators are in the macro world, part of the
Board that runs Nova Roma corp, if gods forbid, Maximus did harm
Kaeso Buteo that would make Nova Roma liable under Tort Law, I
believe ( it has been a while so check) no laughing matter.

bene valete
M. Hortensia Maior
producer 'Vox Romana' podcast
http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/

> >
> > ATS: ahem...there seems to be some confusion here. QFM
threatened CFBQ,
> > whereas in his own opinion, QFM was insulted by CFBQ. CFBQ did
NOT threaten
> > QFM. There have been some very interesting comments made by
others on that
> > list of late, too, as well as something resembling a logical
fallacy which
> > appeared in a quoted source. The petitio had to do with the
tender
> > sensibilities of QFM being insulted by some things CFBQ said,
whereas the
> > investigation by Octavius has to do with threats of physical
violence against
> > CFBQ made by QFM. Have we got this straight now? These are two
separate, but
> > related, incidents, requiring very different procedures in
dealing with them.
> >
> >
> > cannot remember.
> >
> > ATS: Now, that you should recall; it¹s mentioned often
enough.
> > More comments interleaved below.
> >
> > bene vale
> > Maior
> >
> >> > Hmm. Q. Fabius Maximus lives in provincia California. Caeso
> > Fabius Buteo
> >> > Quintilianus lives in provincia
> >> > Thule. The supposed threat occurred on a Senate list that
only
> > Senatores
> >> > and Tribunes are supposed to have access to until the
Tribunes and
> > the Senate
> >> > issue the final deliberations of the Senate as decided by a
> > consultum. Did
> >> > any members of the Senate happen to exercise a bit of common
> > sense and suggest
> >> > that Maximus (if an actual threat of violence actually did
occur)
> >
> > ATS: It did...have you read the list?
> >
> >
> > might want
> >> > to withdraw his threat & issue a simple personal apology?
Did
> > any members
> >> > of the Senate suggest that the threat is pretty much empty
unless
> > Maximus was
> >> > prepared to spend thousands of dollars to go to Thule,
commit an
> > act that
> >> > would almost surely guarantee his arrest, and then spend
> > thousands more dollars
> >> > to deal with the matter?
> >
> > ATS: It may not be as empty as you think. Word has it that
QFM is not
> > lacking in sufficient spare cash for that sort of adventure.
Now, he might
> > have been blowing off steam, but the possibility that he was not
still exists.
> > One must also remember that the perpetrators of that sort of
thing seem to
> > fall into the loving arms of the law all too seldom.
> >
> >
> > Is anyone involved in this matter,
> > Senators or
> >> > Censores or Praetores, at all concerned that words posted in
the
> > heat of an
> >> > internet discussion could be settled amicably without making
the
> > matter public on
> >> > the ML?
> >
> > ATS: We are bound to deal with petitiones within a
specified time frame.
> > The law allows very few exceptions to acceptance, so it had to
be accepted,
> > which in turn required the posting of the notice and the
formula. That is our
> > law, and we obey it. Unlike some of our Cheshire-cat
magistrates and
> > magisterial candidates, we believe in performing our duty.
> >> >
> >> > Just asking, of course. (And giggling hysterically about the
> > silliness of
> >> > it all).
> >> >
> >> > Excuse me. As a Tribune, I am sworn to support and protect
the
> > Constitution
> >> > and by-laws of Nova Roma in both the letter and the spirit.
> > Regardless of
> >> > how ridiculous I may personally feel about it.
> >
> > ATS: I for one don¹t consider obedience to NR laws as
silly, though
> > obedience to some in the macro world certainly is. Those of us
who are of a
> > more philosophical temperament and don¹t require laws to keep us
behaving
> > properly tend to look on some of those as being silly in their
own right, but
> > our laws are necessary guideposts for dealing with a far-flung
and diverse
> > group.
> >
> > Was last year¹s In Scaevolam silly, tua sententia? In Ap.
Claudium
> > Priscum?
> >> >
> >> > Fl. Galerius Aurelianus,
> >> > Tribunus Plebis
> >> >
> Valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica,
> Praetrix
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50214 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-05-07
Subject: Apology to QFM, LSD, & LECA
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

I hereby issue a public apology to Senatores & Pontifices Quintus
Fabius Maximus and Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus Augur, and Citizen
Lucius Sicinius Drusus for an inappropriate comment (message #2012) I
made on the Collegium Pontificum e-mail list on Tuesday, September
20th, 2005. I take responsibility for my actions and believe that
senatores, pontifices, magistrates, and citizens should endeavor to
show respect for one another even in times of heated deliberation.
That being said, responsibility has to start with one's self and
therefore I issue this public apology.

Valete:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Censor, Consular, Proconsul, Pontifex, Flamen Pomonalis, Augur, & Lictor.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50215 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-08
Subject: a.d. VIII Id. Mai.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem VIII Idus Maias; haec dies fastus aterque est.

"Why do they reckon the day that follows the Kalends, the Nones, or
the Ides as unsuitable for leaving home or for travel?

Is it, as most authorities think and as Livy records, that on the day
after the Ides of Quintilis, which they now call July, the military
tribunes led out the army, and were vanquished in battle by the Gauls
at the river Allia and lost the City? But when the day after the Ides
had come to be regarded as ill-omened, did superstition, as is its
wont, extend the custom further, and involve in the same
circumspection the day after the Nones and the day after the Kalends?

Or does this contain many irrational assumptions? For it was on a
different day that they were defeated in battle, a day which they call
Alliensis from the river, and make a dread day of expiation; and
although they have many ill-omened days, they do not observe them
under the same names in each month, but each in the month in which it
occurs; and it is thus quite incredible that the superstition should
have attached itself simply to all the days that follow immediately
after the Nones or the Kalends.

Consider the following analogy: just as they have dedicated the first
month to the gods of Olympus, and the second, in which they perform
certain rites of purification and sacrifice to the departed, to the
gods of the lower world, so also in regard to the days of the month
they have established three as festive and holy days, as I have
stated, which are, as it were, fundamental and sovereign days; but the
days which follow immediately they have dedicated to the spirits and
the dead, and have come to regard them as ill-omened and unsuitable
for business. In fact, the Greeks worship the gods on the day of the
new moon; the next day they have duly assigned to the heroes and
spirits, and the second bowl of wine is mixed in honour of the heroes
and heroines. And speaking generally, time is a sort of number; and
the beginning of number is divine, for it is the monad. But after it
is the dyad, antagonistic to the beginning number, and the first of
the even numbers. The even numbers are imperfect, incomplete, and
indeterminate, just as the odd numbers are determinate, completing,
and perfect. Wherefore, in like manner, the Nones succeed the Kalends
at an interval of five days and the Ides succeed the Nones at an
interval of nine days. For the odd numbers define the beginnings but
even numbers, since they occur after the beginnings, have no position
nor power; therefore on these days they do not begin any business or
travel.

Since, therefore, all travel and all business of importance needs
provision and preparation, and since in ancient days the Romans, at
the time of festivals, made no provision or plan for anything, save
only that they were engaged in the service of their gods and busied
themselves with this only, just as even to this day the priests cause
such a proclamation to be made in advance as they proceed on their way
to sacrifice; so it was only natural that they did not set out on a
journey immediately after their festivals, nor did they transact any
business, for they were unprepared; dbut that day they always spent at
home making their plans and preparations.

Or is it even as men now, who have offered their prayers and
oblations, are wont to tarry and sit a while in the temples,55 and so
they would not let busy days succeed holy days immediately, but made
some pause and breathing-space between, since business brings with it
much that is distasteful and undesired?" - Plutarch, "The Roman
Questions" 25



Today St. Michael the Archangel made a miraculous appearance at Monte
Gargano in Manfredonia in southern Italy. This Christian saint, Prince
of All Angels, was the leader of the army of God during the Lucifer
uprising, casting Satan out of Paradise. He is one of only two angels
named in the Western canonical scriptures, the other being Gabriel. He
is associated with the planet Mercury. Muslims, Christians and Jews
all express devotion to him, and there are writings about him in all
three religions. Considered the guardian angel of Israel, Michael's
name means in Hebrew, 'Who is like God', referring not to the
archangel himself but rather his battle cry. When the Archangel
appeared to the Bishop of Siponto, Michael requested that a church be
built in his honor at the place. St Romuald once assigned emperor Otho
III the penance of a barefoot pilgrimage to Saint Michael's Church on
Mount Gargano.


Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Plutarch, Wikipedia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50216 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-05-08
Subject: King Herod's Tomb Possibly Found?
Salvete omnes,

Here is an article on Yahoo news this morning. This is a very
interesting find.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070508/ap_on_sc/israel_herod_s_tomb

Regards,

QSP
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50217 From: Mary Caldwell Date: 2007-05-08
Subject: I just passed my citizenship test!
Salvete omnes!

It is with great pleasure that I announce to you that I have passed my
citizenship test with flying colors and am now a citizen of Nova Roma! I
plan to be very involved in California Provincia, and look forward to being
a contributing citizen!

Valete,

Lucia Caecilia Marcella



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50218 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-05-08
Subject: Re: I just passed my citizenship test!
---Pompeia Minucia Strabo Luciae Caeciliae Marcellae S.D.

My congratulations to you on this special occasion!

Vale


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Mary Caldwell" <mary_caldwell@...>
wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes!
>
> It is with great pleasure that I announce to you that I have passed
my
> citizenship test with flying colors and am now a citizen of Nova
Roma! I
> plan to be very involved in California Provincia, and look forward
to being
> a contributing citizen!
>
> Valete,
>
> Lucia Caecilia Marcella
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50219 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-08
Subject: Re: I just passed my citizenship test!
Salvete Marcella;
congratulations! Nova Roma is a great & wonderful place. This is
my 4th year as a civis & I've loved every minute of it. Join a
sodalitas, take a course at Academia Thules, work for your provincia
& you will be part of something wonderful.
M. Hortensia Maior
producer 'Vox Romana' podcast
http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/
Yup;-) Caius Curius Saturninus posted on the ML for a producer of a
podcast, & I went from clueless git to producer. There really are
undreamt of possibilities in NR.

>
> My congratulations to you on this special occasion!
>
> Vale
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Mary Caldwell" <mary_caldwell@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete omnes!
> >
> > It is with great pleasure that I announce to you that I have
passed
> my
> > citizenship test with flying colors and am now a citizen of Nova
> Roma! I
> > plan to be very involved in California Provincia, and look
forward
> to being
> > a contributing citizen!
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Lucia Caecilia Marcella
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50220 From: mrgrumpkin Date: 2007-05-08
Subject: The Childhood of Gaius Cassius Longinus
Can anybody tell me a bit about famous Liberatore Gaius Cassius
Longinus' childhood? I'm having a hell of a time shedding any light on
it!

Valete

Quintus Apollonius Cicero (Chuck)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50221 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-05-08
Subject: Re: I just passed my citizenship test!
Tibi congratulator, Lucia Caecilia!

I know you'll make great conributions to the Republic and our province.

Vale optime,

L. Iunius Bassus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Mary Caldwell" <mary_caldwell@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes!
>
> It is with great pleasure that I announce to you that I have passed my
> citizenship test with flying colors and am now a citizen of Nova Roma! I
> plan to be very involved in California Provincia, and look forward to being
> a contributing citizen!
>
> Valete,
>
> Lucia Caecilia Marcella
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50222 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-05-09
Subject: Re: The Childhood of Gaius Cassius Longinus
Salve Cicero! (an apt name, considering the subject)

Wikipedia says "Little is known of Caius Cassius's early life." and
that sadly seems to be the case.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaius_Cassius_Longinus

Optime vale!

Agricola


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "mrgrumpkin" <mrgrumpkin@...> wrote:
>
> Can anybody tell me a bit about famous Liberatore Gaius Cassius
> Longinus' childhood? I'm having a hell of a time shedding any light on
> it!
>
> Valete
>
> Quintus Apollonius Cicero (Chuck)
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50223 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-09
Subject: Re: I just passed my citizenship test!
C. Equitius Cato praetore Luciae Caeciliae Marcellae salutem dicit.

Salve, citizen!

Welcome to our odd yet fascinating corner of the world! If you need
anything at all from the praetors' office, just say the word.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50224 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-09
Subject: a.d. VII Id. Mai.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem VII Idus Maias; haec dies nefastus est.

"When Hesperus, the Evening Star, has shown his lovely face
Three times, from that day, and the defeated stars fled Phoebus,
It will be the ancient sacred rites of the Lemuria,
When we make offerings to the voiceless spirits.
The year was once shorter, the pious rites of purification, februa,
Were unknown, nor were you, two-faced Janus, leader of the months:
Yet they still brought gifts owed to the ashes of the dead,
The grandson paid respects to his buried grandfather's tomb.
It was May month, named for our ancestors (maiores),
And a relic of the old custom still continues.
When midnight comes, lending silence to sleep,
And all the dogs and hedgerow birds are quiet,
He who remembers ancient rites, and fears the gods,
Rises (no fetters binding his two feet)
And makes the sign with thumb and closed fingers,
Lest an insubstantial shade meets him in the silence.
After cleansing his hands in spring water,
He turns and first taking some black beans,
Throws them with averted face: saying, while throwing:
`With these beans I throw I redeem me and mine.'
He says this nine times without looking back: the shade
Is thought to gather the beans, and follow behind, unseen.
Again he touches water, and sounds the Temesan bronze,
And asks the spirit to leave his house.
When nine times he's cried: `Ancestral spirit, depart,'
He looks back, and believes the sacred rite's fulfilled.
Why the day's so called, and the origin of the name,
Escapes me: that's for some god to discover.
Mercury, son of the Pleiad, explain it to me, by your
Potent wand: you've often seen Stygian Jove's halls.
The caduceus-bearer came, at my prayer. Learn then,
The reason for the name: the god himself revealed it.
When Romulus had sunk his brother's spirit in the grave,
And justice was done to the over-hasty Remus,
The wretched Faustulus, and Acca with streaming hair,
Sprinkled the calcined bones with their tears.
Then at twilight they returned home grieving,
And flung themselves on the hard couch, just as it lay.
The bloodstained ghost of Remus seemed to stand
By the bed, speaking these words in a faint murmur:
`Behold, I who was half, the other part of your care,
See what I am, and know what I was once!
If the birds had signalled the throne was mine,
I might have been highest, ruling over the people,
Now I'm an empty phantom, gliding from the fire:
That is what remains of Remus' form!
Ah, where is Mars, my father? If you once spoke
The truth, it was he who sent us the she-wolf's teats.
The rash hand of a citizen undid what the wolf saved.
O how gentle she was in comparison!
Savage Celer, wounded, may you yield your cruel spirit,
And bloodstained as I am, sink beneath the earth.
My brother never wished it: his love equals mine:
He offered, at my death, all he could, his tears.
Beg him by your weeping, by your nurturing,
To signal a day of celebration in my honour.'
They stretched out their arms at this, longing to embrace him,
But the fleeting shade escaped their clutching hands.
When the phantom fleeing dispelled their sleep,
They both told the king of his brother's words.
Romulus, complying, called that day the Remuria,
When reverence is paid our buried ancestors.
Over time the harsh consonant at the beginning
Of the name, was altered into a soft one:
And soon the silent spirits were called Lemures too:
That's the meaning of the word, that's its force.
And the ancients closed the temples on these days,
As you see them shut still at the season of the dead.
It's a time when it's not suitable for widows or virgins
To wed: she who marries then won't live long.
And if you attend to proverbs, then, for that reason too,
People say unlucky women wed in the month of May.
Though these three festivals fall at the same time,
They are not observed on three consecutive days." - Ovid, Fasti V

"Excipiet gentem Remo scilicet interempto, post cuius mortem natam
constat pestilentiam: unde consulta oracula dixerunt placandos esse
manes fratris extincti; ob quam rem sella curulis cum sceptro et
corona et ceteris regni insignibus semper iuxta sancientem aliquid
Romulum ponebatur, ut pariter imperare viderentur. unde est Remo cum
fratre Quirinus iura dabunt." - Servius, "Ad Aeneas" i.276

Today is the first day of the Lemuria, a feast during which the
ancient Romans performed rites to exorcise the malevolent and fearful
ghosts of the dead from their homes. The unwholesome and malevolent
specters of the restless dead (lemures) were propitiated with
offerings of beans. On those days, the Vestals would prepare sacred
mola salsa (salt cake) from the first ears of wheat of the season.

In the Iulian calendar the three days of the feast were 9, 11, and 13
May. The myth of origin of this ancient festival was that it had been
instituted by Romulus to appease the spirit of Remus. Ovid (above)
notes that at this festival it was the custom to appease or expel the
evil spirits by walking barefoot and throwing black beans over the
shoulder at night. It was the head of the household who was
responsible for getting up at midnight and walking around the house
with bare feet throwing out black beans and repeating the incantation,
"With these beans I redeem me and mine" nine times. The household
would then clash bronze pots while repeating, "Ghosts of my fathers
and ancestors, be gone!" nine times. Because of this annual exorcism
of the restless malevolent spirits of the dead, the whole month of May
was rendered unlucky for marriages, whence the proverb Mense Maio
malae nubent ("They wed ill who wed in May"), and thus the rush of
June weddings in our own day. The Lemuria is held on odd-numbered
days because the Romans believed that even-numbered days wrre unlucky.

On the culminating day of the Lemuralia, May 13 in 609 or 610 — the
day being recorded as more significant than the year — Pope Boniface
IV consecrated the Pantheon at Rome to the Blessed Virgin and all the
martyrs, and the feast of the dedicatio Sanctae Mariae ad Martyres has
been celebrated at Rome ever since.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Servius, Wikipedia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50225 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-05-09
Subject: Nova Roma Taxes Due, 5/9/2007, 12:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Nova Roma Taxes Due
 
Date:   Wednesday May 9, 2007
Time:   12:00 pm - 1:00 pm
Repeats:   This event repeats every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday until Thursday May 31, 2007.
Notes:   The Tax Edict (rates, address, other info) is at http://novaroma.org/nr/Tax_rate_%28Nova_Roma%29

NEW! Pay through the Album Civium!

* 1. log in at Album Civium ( http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album )
* 2. go to My Account
* 3. go to "make payment"
* 4. add citizens to the list if paying for multiple citizens
* 5. choose pay pal or check
* 6. if choosing pay pal, continue through pay pal until it sends you back to My Account
* 7. if choosing check, print and mail

 
Copyright © 2007  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50226 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-05-09
Subject: Call For Rogator
Salvete omnes,

I am posting to this ML to let you know that I submitted my name for
the office of Rogator several days ago. That department could lots of
help from what I can see so I look forward to the work. I see another
citizen has put his name in as well and that is a great sign there are
people willing to serve and take some responsibility. I believe we
need to realize that one gets out of an organization what he or she
puts into it in most cases.

Your consideration of my candidacy is greatly appreciated and whatever
happens, I shall still be happy and willing to serve in this
department in any capacity.

Regards,

Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50227 From: Jorge Hernandez Date: 2007-05-09
Subject: Re: The Childhood of Gaius Cassius Longinus
Try checking this website that's called "Ancient History Sourcebook". I think Plutarch may have written a few things about him, although I don't know if his childhood is mentioned.

mrgrumpkin <mrgrumpkin@...> wrote: Can anybody tell me a bit about famous Liberatore Gaius Cassius
Longinus' childhood? I'm having a hell of a time shedding any light on
it!

Valete

Quintus Apollonius Cicero (Chuck)






---------------------------------
Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50228 From: Titus Vergilius Catulus Date: 2007-05-09
Subject: Question about my account
Salvete omnes!
Yesterday I logged in my account in the Nova Roma homepage and I changed my e-mail address to this one. Today I wanted to see my account again, but it's completely impossible to logg in. Could somebody help me?
Thanks!
Titus Vergilius Catulus


---------------------------------
All New Yahoo! Mail – Tired of unwanted email come-ons? Let our SpamGuard protect you.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50229 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-05-09
Subject: Re: Question about my account
Salve Tite Vergili,

Please write to me (or to the censors) off-list with your name and address, so
I can identify you as the person who should have access. The e-mail address
below is not the same address as the one in the censors' database.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS

Titus Vergilius Catulus <titusvergiliuscatulus@...> writes:

> Salvete omnes!
> Yesterday I logged in my account in the Nova Roma homepage and I changed
> my e-mail address to this one. Today I wanted to see my account again, but
> it's completely impossible to logg in. Could somebody help me?
> Thanks!
> Titus Vergilius Catulus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50230 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-10
Subject: a.d. VI Id. Mai.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem VI Idus Maias; haec dies comitialis est.

"Why is it that when they worship the gods, they cover their heads,
but when they meet any of their fellow-men worthy of honour, if they
happen to have the toga over the head, they uncover?

This second fact seems to intensify the difficulty of the first. If,
then, the tale told of Aeneas is true that, when Diomedes passed by,
he covered his head and completed the sacrifice, it is reasonable and
consistent with the covering of one's head in the presence of an enemy
that men who meet good men and their friends should uncover. In fact,
the behaviour in regard to the gods is not properly related to this
custom, but accidentally resembles it; and its observance has
persisted since the days of Aeneas.

But if there is anything else to be said, consider whether it be not
true that there is only one matter that needs investigation: why men
cover their heads when they worship the gods; and the other follows
from this. For they uncover their heads in the presence of men more
influential than they: it is not to invest these men with additional
honour, but rather to avert from them the jealousy of the gods, that
these men may not seem to demand the same honours as the gods, nor to
tolerate an attention like that bestowed on the gods, nor to rejoice
therein. But they thus worshipped the gods, either humbling themselves
by concealing the head, or rather by pulling the toga over their ears
as a precaution lest any ill-omened and baleful sound from without
should reach them while they were praying. That they were mightily
vigilant in this matter is obvious from the fact that when they went
forth for purposes of divination, they surrounded themselves with the
clashing of bronze.

Or, as Castor states when he is trying to bring Roman customs into
relation with Pythagorean doctrines: the Spirit within us entreats and
supplicates the gods without, and thus he symbolizes by the covering
of the head the covering and concealment of the soul by the body.


Why do sons cover their heads when they escort their parents to the
grave, while daughters go with uncovered heads and hair unbound?

Is it because fathers should be honoured as gods by their male
offspring, but mourned as dead by their daughters, that custom has
assigned to each sex its proper part and has produced a fitting result
from both? Or is it that the unusual is proper in mourning, and it is
more usual for women to go forth in public with their heads covered
band men with their heads uncovered? So in Greece, whenever any
misfortune comes, the women cut off their hair and the men let it
grow, for it is usual for men to have their hair cut and for women to
let it grow. Or is it that it has become customary for sons to cover
their heads for the reason already given? For they turn about at the
graves, as Varro relates, thus honouring the tombs of their fathers
even as they do the shrines of the gods; and when they have cremated
their parents, they declare that the dead person has become a god at
the moment when first they find a bone.

But formerly women were not allowed to cover the head at all. At least
it is recorded cthat Spurius Carvilius was the first man to divorce
his wife and the reason was her barrenness; the second was Sulpicius
Gallus, because he saw his wife pull her cloak over her head; and the
third was Publius Sempronius, because his wife had been present as a
spectator at funeral games." - Plutarch, "The Roman Questions" 10, 14

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Plutarch
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50231 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-05-10
Subject: Contribute to the Nova Roma Wiki, 5/10/2007, 12:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Contribute to the Nova Roma Wiki
 
Date:   Thursday May 10, 2007
Time:   12:00 pm - 1:00 pm
Repeats:   This event repeats every month.
Location:   http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Main_Page
Notes:   All citizens can contribute to the wiki. See http://www.novaroma.org/nr/NovaRoma:Project_of_the_Nundinum for the latest project.
 
Copyright © 2007  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50232 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-11
Subject: a.d. V Id. Mai.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem V Idus Maias; haec dies nefastus est.

Today is the second day of the Lemuria.

"You'll be disappointed if you look for Boeotian Orion,
On the middle of these three days. I must sing of those stars.
Jupiter, and his brother who rules the deep ocean,
Were journeying together, with Mercury.
It was the hour when yoked oxen drag back the plough,
And the lamb kneels down to drink the full ewe's milk.
By chance, an old man, Hyrieus, farmer of a tiny plot,
Saw them, as he stood in front of his meagre dwelling:
And spoke to them: `The way's long, little of day is left,
And my threshold's welcoming to strangers.'
He stressed his words with a look, inviting them again:
They accepted his offer, hiding their divinity.
They entered the old man's cottage, black with smoke:
There was still a flicker of fire in yesterday's log.
He knelt and blew the flames higher with his breath,
And drew out broken brands, and chopped them up.
Two pots stood there: the smaller contained beans,
The other vegetables: each boiling beneath its lid.
While they waited, he poured red wine with a trembling hand:
The god of the sea accepted the first cup, and when
He'd drained it, he said: `Let Jupiter drink next.'
Hearing the name of Jupiter the old man grew pale.
Recovering his wits, he sacrificed the ox that ploughed
His meagre land, and roasted it in a great fire:
And he brought out wine, in smoke-streaked jars,
That he'd once stored away as a young boy.
Promptly they reclined on couches made of rushes,
And covered with linen, but still not high enough.
Now the table was bright with food, bright with wine:
The bowl was red earthenware, with cups of beech wood.
Jupiter's word was: `If you've a wish, ask it:
All will be yours.' The old man said calmly:
`I had a dear wife, whom I knew in the flower
Of my first youth. Where is she now, you ask?
An urn contains her. I swore to her, calling
On you gods, "You'll be the only wife I'll take."
I spoke, and kept the oath. I ask for something else:
I wish to be a father, and not a husband.'
The gods agreed: All took their stand beside
The ox-hide – I'm ashamed to describe the rest –
Then they covered the soaking hide with earth:
Ten months went past and a boy was born.
Hyrieus called him Urion, because of his conception:
The first letter has now lost its ancient sound.
He grew immensely: Latona took him for a friend,
He was her protector and her servant.
Careless words excite the anger of the gods:
He said: `There's no wild creature I can't conquer.'
Earth sent a Scorpion: its purpose was to attack
The Goddess, who bore the twins, with its curved dart:
Orion opposed it. Latona set him among the shining stars,
And said: `Take now the reward you've truly earned.'" - Ovid, Fasti V

Plutarch placed great faith in ghosts and visions. In his Life of Dion
he notes the singular fact that both Dion and Brutus were warned of
their approaching deaths by a frightful spectre. "It has been
maintained," he adds:

"that no man in his senses ever saw a ghost: that these are the
delusive visions of women and children, or of men whose intellects are
impaired by some physical infirmity, and who believe that their
diseased imaginations are of divine origin. But if Dion and Brutus,
men of strong and philosophic minds, whose understandings were not
affected by any constitutional infirmity—if such men could place so
much faith in the appearance of spectres as to give an account of them
to their friends, I see no reason why we should depart from the
opinion of the ancients that men had their evil genii, who disturbed
them with fears and distressed their virtues ..." (Plutarch, "Life of
Dion" ch. 2)

Cicero tells us that it was generally believed that the dead lived on
beneath the earth, and special provision was made for them in every
Latin town in the "mundus," a deep trench which was dug before the
"pomerium" was traced, and regarded as the particular entrance to the
lower world for the dead of the town in question. The trench was
vaulted over, so that it might correspond more or less with the sky, a
gap being left in the vault which was closed with the stone of the
departed—the "lapis manalis." Corn was thrown into the trench, which
was filled up with earth, and an altar erected over it. On three
solemn days in the year —-- August 25, October 5, and November 8 --—
the trench was opened and the stone removed, the dead thus once more
having free access to the world above, where the usual offerings were
made to them.

These provisions clearly show an official belief that death did not
create an impassable barrier between the dead and the living. The
spirits of the departed still belonged to the city of their birth, and
took an interest in their old home. They could even return to it on
the days when "the trench of the gods of gloom lies open and the very
jaws of hell yawn wide" (Macrobius, "Saturnalia" i.16). Their rights
must be respected, if evil was to be averted from the State. In fact,
the dead were gods with altars of their own, and Cornelia, the mother
of the Gracchi, could write to her sons, "You will make offerings to
me and invoke your parent as a god" (Cornelius Nepos, "Deum parentem",
Fragment 12). Their cult was closely connected with that of the
Lares—the gods of the hearth, which symbolized a fixed abode in
contrast with the early nomad life. Indeed, there is practically no
distinction between the Lares and the Manes, the souls of the good dead.

In Homer the shade of Patroclus, which visited Achilles in a vision as
he slept by the sea-shore, looks exactly as Patroclus had looked on
earth, even down to the clothes. Hadrian's famous "animula vagula
blandula" gives the same idea, and it would be difficult to imagine a
disembodied spirit which retains its personality and returns to earth
again except as a kind of immaterial likeness of its earthly self. We
often hear of the extreme pallor of ghosts, which was doubtless due to
their being bloodless and to the pallor of death itself. Propertius
conceived of them as skeletons; but the unsubstantial, shadowy aspect
is by far the commonest, and best harmonizes with the life they were
supposed to lead.

Plutarch relates how, in his native city of Chaeronaea, a certain
Damon had been murdered in some baths. Ghosts continued to haunt the
spot ever afterwards, and mysterious groans were heard, so that at
last the doors were walled up. "And to this very day," he continues,
"those who live in the neighbourhood imagine that they see strange
sights and are terrified with cries of sorrow." (Plutarch, "Life of
Cimon" ch. 1)

But it isn't all as horrible as that. In Lucian's "Philopseudus",
there is the account of a man whose wife, whom he loved dearly,
appeared to him after she had been dead for twenty days. He had given
her a splendid funeral, and had burnt everything she possessed with
her. One day, as he was sitting quietly reading the Phædo, she
suddenly appeared to him, to the terror of his son. As soon as he saw
her he embraced her tearfully, a fact which seems to show that she was
of a more substantial build than the large majority of ghosts of the
ancient world; but she strictly forbade him to make any sound
whatever. She then explained that she had come to upbraid the
unfortunate man for having neglected to burn one of her golden
slippers with her at the funeral. It had fallen behind the chest, she
explained, and had been forgotten and not placed upon the pyre with
the other. While they were talking, a confounded little Maltese puppy
suddenly began to bark from under the bed, when she vanished. But the
slipper was found exactly where she had described, and was duly burnt
on the following day.

Pliny the Younger ("Epistolae" vii.27) tells us how Quintus Curtius
Rufus, who was on the staff of the Governor of Africa, was walking one
day in a colonnade after sunset, when a gigantic woman appeared before
him. She announced that she was Africa, and was able to predict the
future, and told him that he would go to Rome, hold office there,
return to the province with the highest authority, and there die. Her
prophecy was fulfilled to the letter, and as he landed in Africa for
the last time the same figure is reported to have met him.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Macrobius, Plutarch, Cornelius Nepos, Lucian, Pliny,
"Greek and Roman Ghost Stories" by Lacy Collison-Morley
http://www.gutenberg.org)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50233 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-05-11
Subject: Nova Roma Taxes Due, 5/11/2007, 12:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Nova Roma Taxes Due
 
Date:   Friday May 11, 2007
Time:   12:00 pm - 1:00 pm
Repeats:   This event repeats every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday until Thursday May 31, 2007.
Notes:   The Tax Edict (rates, address, other info) is at http://novaroma.org/nr/Tax_rate_%28Nova_Roma%29

NEW! Pay through the Album Civium!

* 1. log in at Album Civium ( http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album )
* 2. go to My Account
* 3. go to "make payment"
* 4. add citizens to the list if paying for multiple citizens
* 5. choose pay pal or check
* 6. if choosing pay pal, continue through pay pal until it sends you back to My Account
* 7. if choosing check, print and mail

 
Copyright © 2007  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50234 From: decimus_iulius_caesar Date: 2007-05-11
Subject: Salve!
Greetings all! It has been awhile since I last posted, my sincerest of apologies for not being
the most communative citizen, but the macro world demands much of my time with work,
painting, writing and many other things. I hope all is well and I look forward to participating
more.

I also have a question regarding Academia Thules. Is it still accepting admissions?

Sincerely,
Decimus Iulius Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50235 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-05-11
Subject: Re: Salve!
> A. Tullia Scholastica D. Iulio Caesari quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
>
> Greetings all! It has been awhile since I last posted, my sincerest of
> apologies for not being
> the most communative citizen, but the macro world demands much of my time with
> work,
> painting, writing and many other things. I hope all is well and I look
> forward to participating
> more.
>
> ATS: Welcome! Glad to have you here.
>
> I also have a question regarding Academia Thules. Is it still accepting
> admissions?
>
> ATS: That depends on what course(s) you are interested in. The Latin
> courses are almost finished for the year (lesson presentation is finished for
> Grammatica Latina I; almost finished for Grammatica Latina II, well along in
> Sermo Latinus I & II, and almost finished in the separate Sermo I and II), and
> will resume in September/October (depending on the instructor and the course;
> Avitus starts in October, and I have been starting in September). Saturninus
> was going to be teaching a literature course starting in early June, but I
> haven¹t heard anything further about that. For other courses, you would have
> to consult the AT website. We have a new system this year in which the
> courses are conducted on websites rather than by e-mail as in the past; if you
> are interested, you must register with the AT and have a password, etc.
> Saturninus can tell you more about this if needed.
>
> Sincerely,
> Decimus Iulius Caesar
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica
> Praeceptrix linguae Latinae
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50236 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-05-11
Subject: May 11st
Salvete

In May 11st of the year 330 aC (or ante diem quintum Idus Maias MLXXXIII a.u.c.) : Byzantium was renamed Nova Roma during a dedication ceremony.

Valete

MCC



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50237 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-05-11
Subject: VI Conventus Novae Romae, 5/12/2007, 12:00 am
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   VI Conventus Novae Romae
 
Date:   Saturday May 12, 2007
Time:   12:00 am - 1:00 am
Repeats:   This event repeats every week until Thursday August 9, 2007.
Location:   http://www.novaroma.org/nr/VI_Conventus_Novae_Romae
Notes:   Brush up your Latin and get your tickets for the VI Conventus Novae Romae in Emerita Augusta, Hispania (Merida, Spain).
 
Copyright © 2007  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50238 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Mai.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem IV Idus Maias; haec dies comitialis est.

"But why are Orion and the other stars rushing to leave
The sky, and why does night contract its course?
Why does bright day, presaged by the Morning Star,
Lift its radiance more swiftly from the ocean waves?
Am I wrong, or did weapons clash? I'm not: they clashed,
Mars comes, giving the sign for war as he comes.
The Avenger himself descends from the sky
To view his shrine and honours in Augustus' forum.
The god and the work are mighty: Mars
Could not be housed otherwise in his son's city.
The shrine is worthy of trophies won from Giants:
From it the Marching God initiates fell war,
When impious men attack us from the East,
Or those from the setting sun must be conquered.
The God of Arms sees the summits of the work,
And approves of unbeaten gods holding the heights.
He sees the various weapons studding the doors,
Weapons from lands conquered by his armies.
Here he views Aeneas bowed by his dear burden,
And many an ancestor of the great Julian line:
There he views Romulus carrying Acron's weapons
And famous heroes' deeds below their ranked statues.
And he sees Augustus' name on the front of the shrine,
And reading `Caesar' there, the work seems greater still.
He had vowed it as a youth, when dutifully taking arms:
With such deeds a Prince begins his reign.
Loyal troops standing here, conspirators over there,
He stretched his hand out, and spoke these words:
`If the death of my `father' Julius, priest of Vesta,
Gives due cause for this war, if I avenge for both,
Come, Mars, and stain the sword with evil blood,
And lend your favour to the better side. You'll gain
A temple, and be called the Avenger, if I win.'
So he vowed, and returned rejoicing from the rout.
Nor is he satisfied to have earned Mars that name,
But seeks the standards lost to Parthian hands,
That race protected by deserts, horses, arrows,
Inaccessible, behind their encircling rivers.
The nation's pride had been roused by the deaths
Of the Crassi, when army, leader, standards all were lost.
The Parthians kept the Roman standards, ornaments
Of war, and an enemy bore the Roman eagle.
That shame would have remained, if Italy's power
Had not been defended by Caesar's strong weapons.
He ended the old reproach, a generation of disgrace:
The standards were regained, and knew their own.
What use now the arrows fired from behind your backs,
Your deserts and your swift horses, you Parthians?
You carry the eagles home: offer your unstrung bows:
Now you no longer own the emblems of our shame.
Rightly the god has his temple, and title twice of Avenger,
And the honour earned has paid the avowed debt.
Quirites, celebrate solemn games in the Circus!
Though that stage scarcely seems worthy of a mighty god." - Ovid, Fasti V

"He [Augustus] built many public works, in particular the following:
his forum with the temple of Mars the Avenger, the temple of Apollo on
the Palatine, and the fane of Jupiter the Thunderer on the Capitol.
His reason for building the forum was the increase in the number of
the people and of cases at law, which seemed to call for a third
forum, since two were no longer adequate. Therefore it was opened to
the public with some haste, before the temple of Mars was finished,
and it was provided that the public prosecutions be held there apart
from the rest, as well as the selection of jurors by lot. He had made
a vow to build the temple of Mars in the war of Philippi, which he
undertook to avenge his father; accordingly he decreed that in it the
senate should consider wars and claims for triumphs, from it those who
were on their way to the provinces with military commands should be
escorted, and to it victors on their return should bear the tokens of
their triumphs." - Seutonius, "Lives of the Caesars", Augustus 29.1-2

"I have compelled the Parthians to give up to me the spoils and
standards of three Roman armies, and as suppliants to seek the
friendship of the Roman people. Those standards, moreover, I have
deposited in the sanctuary located in the temple of Mars the Avenger."
- Augustus Caesar, "Res Gestae Divi Augusti"

The Temple of Mars Ultor was built by the Emperor Augustus for a
variety of reasons. Of course it served as the focal point of his
forum, located in the centrally and the rear (following the example
set by Julius Caesar with his Temple of Venus Genetrix) and closing
off the space at the back of the forum in this manner blocked the view
of the Roman tenements.

But the reasons for this temple go far beyond the practical ones. By
making his temple to Mars the Avenger, Augustus pointedly reminded the
Roman people of that he had avenged the death of Julius Caesar who had
recently been canonized by the Roman Senate. He also reminded the
Senate and the People that he stuck his oath before the battle of
Actium, remaining faithful to the Roman religion; that he clearly
believed in the Roman Virtues, especially Pietas, Gravitas, and
Dignitas. These blunt statements made by Augustus in the temple gave
himself a glorified and deified ancestry, characteristics, and
persona, all suggesting his own worthiness as an Imperator and a
potential deity.

Despite the familial connection that the Roman people considered
themselves to have with Mars, until the time of Augustus, Mars had no
temples within Rome proper aside from the sacrarium in the heart of
the city. The Temple of Mars Gradivus ("he who precedes the army in
battle") was outside the Porta Capena, the gate through which the army
marched on its way to campaigns to the south, and here too each year
the Equites met to begin their procession through the city. Another
site, originally only an altar, was in the Campus Martius, which was
the exercising ground of the army as well as for athletes. Both of
these last two sites were outside the pomerium, and this has been
explained to mean that the war god must be kept at a distance. War was
considered a force to be called upon when needed, rather than one
which should dominate the affairs of the Roman state. In founding his
temple to Mars the Avenger in the Forum Augusti, the emperor Augustus
gave a new turn to the worship of Mars, and for the first time the
Martian cult began to rival that of Capitoline Jupiter. Mars became
the most prominent of the dei militares (military deities) worshipped
by the Roman legions.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Augustus, Seutonius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50239 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Valete
I have been terribly irresponsible, and there is no way that I can make up to you or
apologize enough for what I have done: I cannot assume the responsibilities of "praetor "
of California, I cannot continue as magister of of sodalitas latinitas (a role that I never
really began anyway), and, especially given the fact of these two decisions, I cannot
continue here in Nova Roma. As I am sure you will agree, I don't deserve to. You will
rightly judge me very harshly for having wasted the time of the Senate, for having been the
cause of so much strife and then having betrayed the faith of those who fought for me,
and for being flighty enough to resign again in the space of a year. I cannot justify my
actions to you. I never intended to wrong you, but I made a terrible mistake and I would
wrong you still further by pretending to assume duties that I cannot, and by pretending to
continue in this community when I cannot.

Please do not judge too harshly, however, those who supported me in the Senate. I gave
them every assurance of my sincerity and dedication, and their good judgement was
betrayed by my own poor judgement and gross irresponsibility. At the time I really did
mean to deliver on my promises to them, and perhaps because of this I was all the more
believable to them. I should have known then as I realise now that those promises are
beyond me.

This email address will be terminated. I ask that no one in authority in NR contact me by
any other means on file with the organization. This marks the termination of all of my
contact with New Rome. I ask that the Censors remove from Nova Roma records my
personal information upon receipt of my resignation of citizenship.

Take Martianus as governor of California, and groom Lucia Caecilia for leadership there.
Of the latter I can say with certainty that she will not dissappoint you as I have.

I cannot and will not give any explanation for my actions beyond what I have said here. I
will say only that I would not assume such a disgrace without what are for me very vallid
personal reasons. I am deeply sorry--I know that is not enough, but I am deeply sorry.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50240 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
What a weird email.

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com



----- Original Message -----
From: Lucius Iunius Bassus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 3:45 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Valete


I have been terribly irresponsible, and there is no way that I can make up to you or
apologize enough for what I have done: I cannot assume the responsibilities of "praetor "
of California, I cannot continue as magister of of sodalitas latinitas (a role that I never
really began anyway), and, especially given the fact of these two decisions, I cannot
continue here in Nova Roma. As I am sure you will agree, I don't deserve to. You will
rightly judge me very harshly for having wasted the time of the Senate, for having been the
cause of so much strife and then having betrayed the faith of those who fought for me,
and for being flighty enough to resign again in the space of a year. I cannot justify my
actions to you. I never intended to wrong you, but I made a terrible mistake and I would
wrong you still further by pretending to assume duties that I cannot, and by pretending to
continue in this community when I cannot.

Please do not judge too harshly, however, those who supported me in the Senate. I gave
them every assurance of my sincerity and dedication, and their good judgement was
betrayed by my own poor judgement and gross irresponsibility. At the time I really did
mean to deliver on my promises to them, and perhaps because of this I was all the more
believable to them. I should have known then as I realise now that those promises are
beyond me.

This email address will be terminated. I ask that no one in authority in NR contact me by
any other means on file with the organization. This marks the termination of all of my
contact with New Rome. I ask that the Censors remove from Nova Roma records my
personal information upon receipt of my resignation of citizenship.

Take Martianus as governor of California, and groom Lucia Caecilia for leadership there.
Of the latter I can say with certainty that she will not dissappoint you as I have.

I cannot and will not give any explanation for my actions beyond what I have said here. I
will say only that I would not assume such a disgrace without what are for me very vallid
personal reasons. I am deeply sorry--I know that is not enough, but I am deeply sorry.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50241 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
M. Horensia Maior A. Minucia Marcella spd;
Yes,it is weird.Think he got religion? & not the normal
mainstream kind;-)
Maior
>
>
> What a weird email.
>
> Vale,
>
> Annia Minucia Marcella
> http://minucia.ciarin.com
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Lucius Iunius Bassus
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 3:45 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Valete
>
>
> I have been terribly irresponsible, and there is no way that I
can make up to you or
> apologize enough for what I have done: I cannot assume the
responsibilities of "praetor "
> of California, I cannot continue as magister of of sodalitas
latinitas (a role that I never
> really began anyway), and, especially given the fact of these
two decisions, I cannot
> continue here in Nova Roma. As I am sure you will agree, I don't
deserve to. You will
> rightly judge me very harshly for having wasted the time of the
Senate, for having been the
> cause of so much strife and then having betrayed the faith of
those who fought for me,
> and for being flighty enough to resign again in the space of a
year. I cannot justify my
> actions to you. I never intended to wrong you, but I made a
terrible mistake and I would
> wrong you still further by pretending to assume duties that I
cannot, and by pretending to
> continue in this community when I cannot.
>
> Please do not judge too harshly, however, those who supported me
in the Senate. I gave
> them every assurance of my sincerity and dedication, and their
good judgement was
> betrayed by my own poor judgement and gross irresponsibility. At
the time I really did
> mean to deliver on my promises to them, and perhaps because of
this I was all the more
> believable to them. I should have known then as I realise now
that those promises are
> beyond me.
>
> This email address will be terminated. I ask that no one in
authority in NR contact me by
> any other means on file with the organization. This marks the
termination of all of my
> contact with New Rome. I ask that the Censors remove from Nova
Roma records my
> personal information upon receipt of my resignation of
citizenship.
>
> Take Martianus as governor of California, and groom Lucia
Caecilia for leadership there.
> Of the latter I can say with certainty that she will not
dissappoint you as I have.
>
> I cannot and will not give any explanation for my actions beyond
what I have said here. I
> will say only that I would not assume such a disgrace without
what are for me very vallid
> personal reasons. I am deeply sorry--I know that is not enough,
but I am deeply sorry.
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50242 From: Mike T Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
I find a resignation with a passionate apology to be anything but weird.

Michael


>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50243 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Michael:

Actually I don't find it weird or passionate. I find it pathetic. For
someone to come into Nova Roma and request a leadership opportunity and have
that request granted and then to leave without a legitimate explanation is
not something I can appreciate or respect. His actions are not Roman. He
is a quitter and I simply cannot respect this sort of behavior. Here is
another citizen, Lucius Iunius Bassus, that I will work hard to simply
forget. May his name be forgotten.

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
Censor

On 5/12/07, Mike T <mike@...> wrote:
>
> I find a resignation with a passionate apology to be anything but weird.
>
> Michael
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50244 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Cn. Iulius Caesar omnibus sal.

Bassus was actively encouraged to apply for the role of governor of
California, and the manner in which it was done could only be
described as positively indecent, but of course the objective was to
find someone (anyone with a pulse would have sufficed for his
backers) who could be touted as the great new hope for Provincia
California.

He became the axe with which to implement the execution of Quintus
Fabius Maximus as proconsul of California. Without some flunky to
shove into the role it would have been hard even for some of
Maximus's bitterest opponents to get rid of him. Once before there
were attempts made to remove Maximus, but they failed, partly because
there was no obvious challenger and some Senators refusing to remove
a sitting governor and leave California vacant.

There was much said in the Senate about what Maximus had done, should
have done and didn't do. Frankly on that basis a number of governors
would be axed and throughout all our provinces we see exactly the
same pressures and problems on our citizen roll as Maximus faced. To
say the reasons touted as justifying the need for him to be removed
stank like rotten fish is putting it mildly. Let's face it - Maximus
was removed because his opponents (possibly better to describe some
as enemies) had found a willing stooge and now they were going to
ensure he paid the price for being Quintus Fabius Maximus.

Once Maximus was removed there was an alternative choice to Bassus, a
citizen of long standing, and what was dragged up as a reason not to
appoint him? The Nova Roman "Civil War", his involvement in the quest
for habitation on Mars and his reaction to some changes necessary in
the name of his gens. Instead the Senate voted for a total unknown,
unproven in any way, some because he was the chosen flunky and others
because they didn't like the alternative.

As a safeguard against a possible failure by Bassus to perform in
even the most minimal way, some of them hedged their bets by saying
that if he messed up they could always put someone into the role next
year. Possibly not even they realized that he wouldn't even last a
month. At what point was any consideration given to the best
interests of Nova Roma and trying to maintain the myth that
governor's appointments are meant to be non-political?

This has degenerated into a complete farce and Bassus' backers and
all those who voted for his appointment have a large bowl of eggs on
their heads at the moment. Is anyone going to learn anything from
this? Of course they are not.

But then his backers shouldn't worry. I am sure desperate attempts at
this moment may be being made to bring him back through the gates and
plonk him back into the role again, which if it does transpire would
obviously not have Bassus', Provincia California's or Nova Roma's
interests at heart but would instead be more about wiping that egg
off their faces.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Iunius Bassus"
<iunius_verbosus@...> wrote:
>
> I have been terribly irresponsible, and there is no way that I can
make up to you or
> apologize enough for what I have done: I cannot assume the
responsibilities of "praetor "
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50245 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Salve Gnae Iuli, et salvete omnes,

Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> writes:

> Cn. Iulius Caesar omnibus sal.
>
> Bassus was actively encouraged to apply for the role of governor of
> California, and the manner in which it was done could only be
> described as positively indecent, but of course the objective was to
> find someone (anyone with a pulse would have sufficed for his
> backers) who could be touted as the great new hope for Provincia
> California.

[Remainder snipped]

I don't think it was as clear as all that Gnae Iuli. I for one did not vote
to make Bassus propraetor of California, though I did vote to remove QFM from
that position. Based on what I learned during the 2005 census I felt that
California would remain stunted as long as QFM was proconsul. It's better
for him to be the past proconsul, and now we'll have a good proconsul because
Bassus has at least recognized that he's not up to the task and has resigned.
That will result in Martianus being confirmed as propraetor of California
sometime within the month. I think California will be the better for it.

I'm sorry to see Bassus leave Nova Roma. After his previous crisis I had my
doubts about him. He's young and given to enthusiasms. But that's all in
the past now. I look forward to (again) voting for Martianus.

I would strongly recommend against using Bassus' unfortunate departure as a
springboard to stir up the QFM versus the world controversy. QFM recently
had the good grace to withdraw charges which would have certainly resulted in
a judicial circus and, I suspect, a judgement against him.


Vale, et valete,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50246 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Salve Gnae Iuli,

> There was much said in the Senate about what Maximus had done, should
> have done and didn't do.

Just what *was* said in the Senate, Gnae Iuli?

I've just double-checked - you are not Senator or Tribune. You are not
on the Senate mailing list.

So how can you pretend to have the slightest clue what occurred in a
Senate discussion?

Citizens, take careful note of this. Gn. Iulius Caesar doesn't have the
slightest idea what really happened - he's making all of this up, to
try to score points against people he loathes.

Ask any Senator, and they'll tell you the truth. Don't rely on imagined
conspiracies from someone who wasn't there.

Vale, Octavius.

--
Marcus Octavius Gracchus
octavius@... * http://www.graveyards.com

-"Apes don't read philosophy."
-"Yes they do, Otto, they just don't understand it! Let me correct
you on a few things: Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of
Buddhism is not 'every man for himself'. And the London Underground is
not a political movement! Those are all mistakes. I looked them up."
-from "A Fish Called Wanda"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50247 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Cn. Iulius Caesar omnibus sal.

As Octavius Gracchus Censor knows full well of course I am not on the
Senate list. Instead all one has to do is to read the Tribune's
report attendant to the vote to deselect Maximus and then the one to
appoint Bassus (and one from the previosu year where he retained his
proconsulship).

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NovaRoma-Announce/message/1092

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NovaRoma-Announce/message/1051

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NovaRoma-Announce/message/914

One doesn't have to have a crystal ball to know what was going on,
especially when one links the above posts and their contents to
statements made about Maximus over the years on various public lists.
A complete unknown appears and without even being tested in any minor
position is pushed towards a governor's position. The sentiments were
clear amongst some Senators - anyone but Maximus.

Is California one whit better off today? If the answer is yes then it
is because those saying so detest Maximus. Let's have a little
honesty here, insead of this charade about seeking the best and
trying to develop enthuiastic yound citizens, blah blah blah.

It was a political assination - plain and simple. Fine - very Roman,
just don't try and dress a pig up in a silk dress, for it remains a
pig. If we want a Roman republic then lets be honest about what we do
and why we do it, for if we do not then what we do, as now,
degenerates into a farce.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Octavius Gracchus" <hucke@...>
wrote:
>
>
> Salve Gnae Iuli,
>
> > There was much said in the Senate about what Maximus had done,
should
> > have done and didn't do.
>
> Just what *was* said in the Senate, Gnae Iuli?
>
> I've just double-checked - you are not Senator or Tribune. You are
not
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50248 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Salve Marine.

QFM is a dead duck. That result is clear. The point is how did we end
up in this ridiculous situation where an unknown appears, Maximus is
axed, an alternative of long standing rejected and then the unknown
quits?

This is hardly the model of organization and yes I had noted you did
not vote for him. My point is that even when some (other) people try
to organize a political assassination using this pawn, they make a
complete botch of it. How pathetic a testamant to their inability is
that?

Vale bene
Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Gnae Iuli, et salvete omnes,
>
> Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> writes:
>
> > Cn. Iulius Caesar omnibus sal.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50249 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
---Salvete Hortensia Maior, Minucia Marcella et Omnes:

I, too, found this email *weird*...very, very atypical for Bassus,
when compared to his usual calm, well-rationalized offerings. His
reasons for resigning were quite vague, and his tone had a certain
rash, *panicky* feature that I am not used to reading from Bassus.

If he resigned and this is truly his wish, hey, then what can we do?
I just hope, though, that no threats or other *hyperpersuasions* are
a factor in what seems to be a hasty disappearing act, without any
clear explanation as to why, other than his sudden *realization* that
he's not qualified and he should never have bothered the Senate....

Strange indeed all across the board....his tone, reasoning and his
timing.

Valete
Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Horensia Maior A. Minucia Marcella spd;
> Yes,it is weird.Think he got religion? & not the normal
> mainstream kind;-)
> Maior
> >
> >
> > What a weird email.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Annia Minucia Marcella
> > http://minucia.ciarin.com
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Lucius Iunius Bassus
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 3:45 PM
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Valete
> >
> >
> > I have been terribly irresponsible, and there is no way that I
> can make up to you or
> > apologize enough for what I have done: I cannot assume the
> responsibilities of "praetor "
> > of California, I cannot continue as magister of of sodalitas
> latinitas (a role that I never
> > really began anyway), and, especially given the fact of these
> two decisions, I cannot
> > continue here in Nova Roma. As I am sure you will agree, I
don't
> deserve to. You will
> > rightly judge me very harshly for having wasted the time of the
> Senate, for having been the
> > cause of so much strife and then having betrayed the faith of
> those who fought for me,
> > and for being flighty enough to resign again in the space of a
> year. I cannot justify my
> > actions to you. I never intended to wrong you, but I made a
> terrible mistake and I would
> > wrong you still further by pretending to assume duties that I
> cannot, and by pretending to
> > continue in this community when I cannot.
> >
> > Please do not judge too harshly, however, those who supported
me
> in the Senate. I gave
> > them every assurance of my sincerity and dedication, and their
> good judgement was
> > betrayed by my own poor judgement and gross irresponsibility.
At
> the time I really did
> > mean to deliver on my promises to them, and perhaps because of
> this I was all the more
> > believable to them. I should have known then as I realise now
> that those promises are
> > beyond me.
> >
> > This email address will be terminated. I ask that no one in
> authority in NR contact me by
> > any other means on file with the organization. This marks the
> termination of all of my
> > contact with New Rome. I ask that the Censors remove from Nova
> Roma records my
> > personal information upon receipt of my resignation of
> citizenship.
> >
> > Take Martianus as governor of California, and groom Lucia
> Caecilia for leadership there.
> > Of the latter I can say with certainty that she will not
> dissappoint you as I have.
> >
> > I cannot and will not give any explanation for my actions
beyond
> what I have said here. I
> > will say only that I would not assume such a disgrace without
> what are for me very vallid
> > personal reasons. I am deeply sorry--I know that is not enough,
> but I am deeply sorry.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50250 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> writes:

> It was a political assination - plain and simple.

Your metaphor is running away, Gnae Iuli.

The Senate voted to remove a governor who had proven to be ineffective. That
is what happened to Q. Fabius Maximus. It happened after years and years of
stagnation blamed on "the war in Mesopotamia" when that very same war is
having as detrimental an effect in many other parts of the country and yet we
have other provinces with large military populations that have growth and
vitality while California has become stagnant.

Nobody has assassinated anyone. Please calm your rhetoric.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50251 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> writes:

> [...] how did we end
> up in this ridiculous situation where an unknown appears, Maximus is
> axed, an alternative of long standing rejected and then the unknown
> quits?

Let me answer that by parts.

Maximus was removed from office during the time when the senate normally
reviews sitting governors. At the time nobody else had offered to stand as
governor, so we (the Senate) found ourselves in the difficult situation of
having to leave a province without a governor by refusing to prorogue the
existing governor.

Both consuls set out to find replacements. Consul Faustus put forth Bassus,
who was serving as an assistant to the consul at the time. I will say that
even then Bassus was saying that he'd accept the job but he thought it best
for the Senate to find someone with more time in Nova Roma, of greater years,
and with more in the way of personal resources.

Consul Paulinus convinced M. Martianus Gangalius to present himself.
Gangalius is not without his own problems, having openly opposed Nova Roman
law at times in the past. Many senators felt that a man who insists on
defying existing law could not serve as the Senate's representative. Indeed
I had my own very strong concerns.

In a close senate vote, Bassus got more votes than Gangalius.

What happened since then to cause Bassus to decide to resign, I have no idea.

Please drop the overwrought rhetroic. It's not helping anybody, and you are
looking foolish.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50252 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Salve Marine

I remain far from convinced that the original decision to remove
Maximus was based solely on a logical analysis of his abilities as
proconsul, for it that was the measure a number of other governors
should have followed him. Knowing the strong personal feelings that a
number of his opponents have about him, and that their opposition was
based other factors than his role as proconsul, I tend to see this as
a personal vendetta.

However as you are probably right, it serves no useful purpose to try
to indicate this, for the approved and sanctioned version is clearly
that it was all about California.

As to looking foolish, well I didn't vote for Bassus. I will accede
to your request however to drop the matter, for the moment.

Vale bene
Caesar


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
wrote:
>
> Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> writes:
>
> > [...] how did we end
> > up in this ridiculous situation where an unknown appears, Maximus
is
> > axed, an alternative of long standing rejected and then the
unknown
> > quits?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50253 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
---Pompeia Gn Iulio sal.

If you review the posts you've linked below more carefully, you will
see some inconsistencies which don't support the suggestions you make
in your eloquently written posts today: In some of the Senate
reports you will note *abstentions* of Senators, which do little to
support conspiracy theories. And as Marinus Consularis pointed out
earlier, not every Senator who voted against QFM's proroguement this
year in turn voted for the same replacement candidate. Moreover,
some who voted to prorogue QFM last year, did not vote to do so this
year.

QFM was prorogued by a marginal approval in 2006, and he was on the
ballot x 2. That is a matter of public record. This year he did not
make it... and given that he darned near didn't the year before, this
year's vote against him is not exactly the 'ventricular fib' of
outcomes .

And QFM's guarded victory last year had nothing to do with either
Bassus or Martianus (Bassus wasn't even a citizen). And QFM's loss
this year didn't either as far as I'm concerned, because neither
Bassus nor Martianus were on any agenda/contioed/voted on as
replacement candidates until *after* the matter of QFM's proroguement
was considered and rejected. A matter of record. I can see where a
few Senators who work with the Consuls as Accensi *might* have been
aware of these two applications before they went before the Senate,
but not all Senators worldwide.

Maybe QFM failed to be prorogued 'all by himself'.

Seriously. Is it remotely possible that the gathered opinions formed
by the Senators, and QFM's consequent failure to be prorogued this
year, are based on the past performance and policies of QFM himself?
This notion is as easily extrapolated from the Senate reports as the
idea of a large, growing number of Senators up and deciding that they
wanna pick on him for no good reason.

Vale
Pompeia




In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
<gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Cn. Iulius Caesar omnibus sal.
>
> As Octavius Gracchus Censor knows full well of course I am not on
the
> Senate list. Instead all one has to do is to read the Tribune's
> report attendant to the vote to deselect Maximus and then the one
to
> appoint Bassus (and one from the previosu year where he retained
his
> proconsulship).
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NovaRoma-Announce/message/1092
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NovaRoma-Announce/message/1051
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NovaRoma-Announce/message/914
>
> One doesn't have to have a crystal ball to know what was going on,
> especially when one links the above posts and their contents to
> statements made about Maximus over the years on various public
lists.
> A complete unknown appears and without even being tested in any
minor
> position is pushed towards a governor's position. The sentiments
were
> clear amongst some Senators - anyone but Maximus.
>
> Is California one whit better off today? If the answer is yes then
it
> is because those saying so detest Maximus. Let's have a little
> honesty here, insead of this charade about seeking the best and
> trying to develop enthuiastic yound citizens, blah blah blah.
>
> It was a political assination - plain and simple. Fine - very
Roman,
> just don't try and dress a pig up in a silk dress, for it remains a
> pig. If we want a Roman republic then lets be honest about what we
do
> and why we do it, for if we do not then what we do, as now,
> degenerates into a farce.
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Octavius Gracchus" <hucke@>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Salve Gnae Iuli,
> >
> > > There was much said in the Senate about what Maximus had done,
> should
> > > have done and didn't do.
> >
> > Just what *was* said in the Senate, Gnae Iuli?
> >
> > I've just double-checked - you are not Senator or Tribune. You
are
> not
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50254 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Farewell to you and may Fortuna smile upon you. Thank you for telling
us that you are leaving (rather than just leaving without telling us).
No ill will is harbored in *my* domus.

optime vale!

M. Lucr. Agricola




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Iunius Bassus"
<iunius_verbosus@...> wrote:
>
> I have been terribly irresponsible, and there is no way that I can
make up to you or
> apologize enough for what I have done:

[SNIP]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50255 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
> A. Tullia Scholastica Pompeiae Minuciae Straboni quiritibus bonae voluntatis
> S.P.D.
>
>
>
> ---Salvete Hortensia Maior, Minucia Marcella et Omnes:
>
> I, too, found this email *weird*...very, very atypical for Bassus,
> when compared to his usual calm, well-rationalized offerings.
>
> ATS: Indeed. Any contact I have had with him in his capacity as a former
> student in introductory Latin or as co-magister of the Sodalitas Latinitatis
> or in any other capacity has been a model of reasonable, rational thinking.
>
>
> His
> reasons for resigning were quite vague, and his tone had a certain
> rash, *panicky* feature that I am not used to reading from Bassus.
>
> ATS: Nor am I.
>
> If he resigned and this is truly his wish, hey, then what can we do?
> I just hope, though, that no threats or other *hyperpersuasions* are
> a factor in what seems to be a hasty disappearing act, without any
> clear explanation as to why, other than his sudden *realization* that
> he's not qualified and he should never have bothered the Senate....
>
> Strange indeed all across the board....his tone, reasoning and his
> timing.
>
> ATS: Yes, but after he apparently finished his studies a couple of months
> ago, he had to work two different jobs to make ends meet. Recently he said
> that he would be able to cut his hours at the second one, but perhaps
> something came up and he could not. However, I would not be surprised if
> certain parties did apply pressure on him to leave. Stranger things have
> emanated from certain quarters here.
>
> Valete
> Pompeia
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "Maior"
> <rory12001@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > M. Horensia Maior A. Minucia Marcella spd;
>> > Yes,it is weird.Think he got religion? & not the normal
>> > mainstream kind;-)
>> > Maior
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > What a weird email.
>>> > >
>>> > > Vale,
>>> > >
>>> > > Annia Minucia Marcella
>>> > > http://minucia.ciarin.com
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > > From: Lucius Iunius Bassus
>>> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
>>> > > Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 3:45 PM
>>> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Valete
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > I have been terribly irresponsible, and there is no way that I
>> > can make up to you or
>>> > > apologize enough for what I have done: I cannot assume the
>> > responsibilities of "praetor "
>>> > > of California, I cannot continue as magister of of sodalitas
>> > latinitas (a role that I never
>>> > > really began anyway), and, especially given the fact of these
>> > two decisions, I cannot
>>> > > continue here in Nova Roma. As I am sure you will agree, I
> don't
>> > deserve to. You will
>>> > > rightly judge me very harshly for having wasted the time of the
>> > Senate, for having been the
>>> > > cause of so much strife and then having betrayed the faith of
>> > those who fought for me,
>>> > > and for being flighty enough to resign again in the space of a
>> > year. I cannot justify my
>>> > > actions to you. I never intended to wrong you, but I made a
>> > terrible mistake and I would
>>> > > wrong you still further by pretending to assume duties that I
>> > cannot, and by pretending to
>>> > > continue in this community when I cannot.
>>> > >
>>> > > Please do not judge too harshly, however, those who supported
> me
>> > in the Senate. I gave
>>> > > them every assurance of my sincerity and dedication, and their
>> > good judgement was
>>> > > betrayed by my own poor judgement and gross irresponsibility.
> At
>> > the time I really did
>>> > > mean to deliver on my promises to them, and perhaps because of
>> > this I was all the more
>>> > > believable to them. I should have known then as I realise now
>> > that those promises are
>>> > > beyond me.
>>> > >
>>> > > This email address will be terminated. I ask that no one in
>> > authority in NR contact me by
>>> > > any other means on file with the organization. This marks the
>> > termination of all of my
>>> > > contact with New Rome. I ask that the Censors remove from Nova
>> > Roma records my
>>> > > personal information upon receipt of my resignation of
>> > citizenship.
>>> > >
>>> > > Take Martianus as governor of California, and groom Lucia
>> > Caecilia for leadership there.
>>> > > Of the latter I can say with certainty that she will not
>> > dissappoint you as I have.
>>> > >
>>> > > I cannot and will not give any explanation for my actions
> beyond
>> > what I have said here. I
>>> > > will say only that I would not assume such a disgrace without
>> > what are for me very vallid
>>> > > personal reasons. I am deeply sorry--I know that is not enough,
>> > but I am deeply sorry.
>>> > >




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50256 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
Savle A. Tullia Scholastica who said in part

"However, I would not be surprised if certain parties did apply pressure on him to leave.
Stranger things have emanated from certain quarters here."

Is this idle speculation Praetrix or would you like to name names?

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


----- Original Message -----
From: A. Tullia Scholastica<mailto:fororom@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 10:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Valete


> A. Tullia Scholastica Pompeiae Minuciae Straboni quiritibus bonae voluntatis
> S.P.D.
>
>
>
> ---Salvete Hortensia Maior, Minucia Marcella et Omnes:
>
> I, too, found this email *weird*...very, very atypical for Bassus,
> when compared to his usual calm, well-rationalized offerings.
>
> ATS: Indeed. Any contact I have had with him in his capacity as a former
> student in introductory Latin or as co-magister of the Sodalitas Latinitatis
> or in any other capacity has been a model of reasonable, rational thinking.
>
>
> His
> reasons for resigning were quite vague, and his tone had a certain
> rash, *panicky* feature that I am not used to reading from Bassus.
>
> ATS: Nor am I.
>
> If he resigned and this is truly his wish, hey, then what can we do?
> I just hope, though, that no threats or other *hyperpersuasions* are
> a factor in what seems to be a hasty disappearing act, without any
> clear explanation as to why, other than his sudden *realization* that
> he's not qualified and he should never have bothered the Senate....
>
> Strange indeed all across the board....his tone, reasoning and his
> timing.
>
> ATS: Yes, but after he apparently finished his studies a couple of months
> ago, he had to work two different jobs to make ends meet. Recently he said
> that he would be able to cut his hours at the second one, but perhaps
> something came up and he could not. However, I would not be surprised if
> certain parties did apply pressure on him to leave. Stranger things have
> emanated from certain quarters here.
>
> Valete
> Pompeia
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "Maior"
> <rory12001@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > M. Horensia Maior A. Minucia Marcella spd;
>> > Yes,it is weird.Think he got religion? & not the normal
>> > mainstream kind;-)
>> > Maior
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > What a weird email.
>>> > >
>>> > > Vale,
>>> > >
>>> > > Annia Minucia Marcella
>>> > > http://minucia.ciarin.com<http://minucia.ciarin.com/>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > > From: Lucius Iunius Bassus
>>> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
>>> > > Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 3:45 PM
>>> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Valete
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > I have been terribly irresponsible, and there is no way that I
>> > can make up to you or
>>> > > apologize enough for what I have done: I cannot assume the
>> > responsibilities of "praetor "
>>> > > of California, I cannot continue as magister of of sodalitas
>> > latinitas (a role that I never
>>> > > really began anyway), and, especially given the fact of these
>> > two decisions, I cannot
>>> > > continue here in Nova Roma. As I am sure you will agree, I
> don't
>> > deserve to. You will
>>> > > rightly judge me very harshly for having wasted the time of the
>> > Senate, for having been the
>>> > > cause of so much strife and then having betrayed the faith of
>> > those who fought for me,
>>> > > and for being flighty enough to resign again in the space of a
>> > year. I cannot justify my
>>> > > actions to you. I never intended to wrong you, but I made a
>> > terrible mistake and I would
>>> > > wrong you still further by pretending to assume duties that I
>> > cannot, and by pretending to
>>> > > continue in this community when I cannot.
>>> > >
>>> > > Please do not judge too harshly, however, those who supported
> me
>> > in the Senate. I gave
>>> > > them every assurance of my sincerity and dedication, and their
>> > good judgement was
>>> > > betrayed by my own poor judgement and gross irresponsibility.
> At
>> > the time I really did
>>> > > mean to deliver on my promises to them, and perhaps because of
>> > this I was all the more
>>> > > believable to them. I should have known then as I realise now
>> > that those promises are
>>> > > beyond me.
>>> > >
>>> > > This email address will be terminated. I ask that no one in
>> > authority in NR contact me by
>>> > > any other means on file with the organization. This marks the
>> > termination of all of my
>>> > > contact with New Rome. I ask that the Censors remove from Nova
>> > Roma records my
>>> > > personal information upon receipt of my resignation of
>> > citizenship.
>>> > >
>>> > > Take Martianus as governor of California, and groom Lucia
>> > Caecilia for leadership there.
>>> > > Of the latter I can say with certainty that she will not
>> > dissappoint you as I have.
>>> > >
>>> > > I cannot and will not give any explanation for my actions
> beyond
>> > what I have said here. I
>>> > > will say only that I would not assume such a disgrace without
>> > what are for me very vallid
>>> > > personal reasons. I am deeply sorry--I know that is not enough,
>> > but I am deeply sorry.
>>> > >

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50257 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-05-12
Subject: Re: Valete
---Pompeia Tiberio Galerio Paulino Consul sal.


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@...>
wrote:
>
> Savle A. Tullia Scholastica who said in part
>
> "However, I would not be surprised if certain parties did apply
pressure on him to leave.
> Stranger things have emanated from certain quarters here."
>
> Is this idle speculation Praetrix or would you like to name names?

Pompeia: Why would she have to name names?

Those who've enjoyed indulging in *chronic* name calling, bullying,
assorted posturing, threatening etc. etc. have their documentation
well *named* in the archives... these behavioral exacerbations I
believe, being concurrent to some perceived sense of political or
religious superiority. So with respect Consul, to wonder if certain
behaviours might resurface in the present in any situation, by these
persons or any others for that matter, is not a possibility requiring
excess chin rubbing, really. Not an idle speculation at all...rather
an 'educated' one.

vale
Pompeia
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: A. Tullia Scholastica<mailto:fororom@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 10:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Valete
>
>
> > A. Tullia Scholastica Pompeiae Minuciae Straboni quiritibus
bonae voluntatis
> > S.P.D.
> >
> >
> >
> > ---Salvete Hortensia Maior, Minucia Marcella et Omnes:
> >
> > I, too, found this email *weird*...very, very atypical for
Bassus,
> > when compared to his usual calm, well-rationalized offerings.
> >
> > ATS: Indeed. Any contact I have had with him in his capacity as
a former
> > student in introductory Latin or as co-magister of the
Sodalitas Latinitatis
> > or in any other capacity has been a model of reasonable,
rational thinking.
> >
> >
> > His
> > reasons for resigning were quite vague, and his tone had a
certain
> > rash, *panicky* feature that I am not used to reading from
Bassus.
> >
> > ATS: Nor am I.
> >
> > If he resigned and this is truly his wish, hey, then what can
we do?
> > I just hope, though, that no threats or other
*hyperpersuasions* are
> > a factor in what seems to be a hasty disappearing act, without
any
> > clear explanation as to why, other than his sudden
*realization* that
> > he's not qualified and he should never have bothered the
Senate....
> >
> > Strange indeed all across the board....his tone, reasoning and
his
> > timing.
> >
> > ATS: Yes, but after he apparently finished his studies a couple
of months
> > ago, he had to work two different jobs to make ends meet.
Recently he said
> > that he would be able to cut his hours at the second one, but
perhaps
> > something came up and he could not. However, I would not be
surprised if
> > certain parties did apply pressure on him to leave. Stranger
things have
> > emanated from certain quarters here.
> >
> > Valete
> > Pompeia
> >
> > Vale, et valete.
> >
> >
> >
> > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma%
40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "Maior"
> > <rory12001@> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > M. Horensia Maior A. Minucia Marcella spd;
> >> > Yes,it is weird.Think he got religion? & not the normal
> >> > mainstream kind;-)
> >> > Maior
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > What a weird email.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Vale,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Annia Minucia Marcella
> >>> > > http://minucia.ciarin.com<http://minucia.ciarin.com/>
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > ----- Original Message -----
> >>> > > From: Lucius Iunius Bassus
> >>> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma%
40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
> >>> > > Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 3:45 PM
> >>> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Valete
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I have been terribly irresponsible, and there is no way
that I
> >> > can make up to you or
> >>> > > apologize enough for what I have done: I cannot assume the
> >> > responsibilities of "praetor "
> >>> > > of California, I cannot continue as magister of of
sodalitas
> >> > latinitas (a role that I never
> >>> > > really began anyway), and, especially given the fact of
these
> >> > two decisions, I cannot
> >>> > > continue here in Nova Roma. As I am sure you will agree, I
> > don't
> >> > deserve to. You will
> >>> > > rightly judge me very harshly for having wasted the time
of the
> >> > Senate, for having been the
> >>> > > cause of so much strife and then having betrayed the
faith of
> >> > those who fought for me,
> >>> > > and for being flighty enough to resign again in the space
of a
> >> > year. I cannot justify my
> >>> > > actions to you. I never intended to wrong you, but I made
a
> >> > terrible mistake and I would
> >>> > > wrong you still further by pretending to assume duties
that I
> >> > cannot, and by pretending to
> >>> > > continue in this community when I cannot.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Please do not judge too harshly, however, those who
supported
> > me
> >> > in the Senate. I gave
> >>> > > them every assurance of my sincerity and dedication, and
their
> >> > good judgement was
> >>> > > betrayed by my own poor judgement and gross
irresponsibility.
> > At
> >> > the time I really did
> >>> > > mean to deliver on my promises to them, and perhaps
because of
> >> > this I was all the more
> >>> > > believable to them. I should have known then as I realise
now
> >> > that those promises are
> >>> > > beyond me.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > This email address will be terminated. I ask that no one
in
> >> > authority in NR contact me by
> >>> > > any other means on file with the organization. This marks
the
> >> > termination of all of my
> >>> > > contact with New Rome. I ask that the Censors remove from
Nova
> >> > Roma records my
> >>> > > personal information upon receipt of my resignation of
> >> > citizenship.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Take Martianus as governor of California, and groom Lucia
> >> > Caecilia for leadership there.
> >>> > > Of the latter I can say with certainty that she will not
> >> > dissappoint you as I have.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I cannot and will not give any explanation for my actions
> > beyond
> >> > what I have said here. I
> >>> > > will say only that I would not assume such a disgrace
without
> >> > what are for me very vallid
> >>> > > personal reasons. I am deeply sorry--I know that is not
enough,
> >> > but I am deeply sorry.
> >>> > >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50258 From: L. Vitellius Triarius Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
and, POOF!!! ...there goes another one.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50259 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Salve Pompeia Minucia Tiberia

"Those who've enjoyed indulging in *chronic* name calling, bullying,
assorted posturing, threatening etc. etc." .

So it was THOSE people who drove him away! I hope we find out who THOSE people
are fast.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

----- Original Message -----
From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia<mailto:pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 11:51 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Valete


---Pompeia Tiberio Galerio Paulino Consul sal.

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@...>
wrote:
>
> Savle A. Tullia Scholastica who said in part
>
> "However, I would not be surprised if certain parties did apply
pressure on him to leave.
> Stranger things have emanated from certain quarters here."
>
> Is this idle speculation Praetrix or would you like to name names?

Pompeia: Why would she have to name names?

Those who've enjoyed indulging in *chronic* name calling, bullying,
assorted posturing, threatening etc. etc. have their documentation
well *named* in the archives... these behavioral exacerbations I
believe, being concurrent to some perceived sense of political or
religious superiority. So with respect Consul, to wonder if certain
behaviours might resurface in the present in any situation, by these
persons or any others for that matter, is not a possibility requiring
excess chin rubbing, really. Not an idle speculation at all...rather
an 'educated' one.

vale
Pompeia
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: A. Tullia Scholastica<mailto:fororom@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>>
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 10:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Valete
>
>
> > A. Tullia Scholastica Pompeiae Minuciae Straboni quiritibus
bonae voluntatis
> > S.P.D.
> >
> >
> >
> > ---Salvete Hortensia Maior, Minucia Marcella et Omnes:
> >
> > I, too, found this email *weird*...very, very atypical for
Bassus,
> > when compared to his usual calm, well-rationalized offerings.
> >
> > ATS: Indeed. Any contact I have had with him in his capacity as
a former
> > student in introductory Latin or as co-magister of the
Sodalitas Latinitatis
> > or in any other capacity has been a model of reasonable,
rational thinking.
> >
> >
> > His
> > reasons for resigning were quite vague, and his tone had a
certain
> > rash, *panicky* feature that I am not used to reading from
Bassus.
> >
> > ATS: Nor am I.
> >
> > If he resigned and this is truly his wish, hey, then what can
we do?
> > I just hope, though, that no threats or other
*hyperpersuasions* are
> > a factor in what seems to be a hasty disappearing act, without
any
> > clear explanation as to why, other than his sudden
*realization* that
> > he's not qualified and he should never have bothered the
Senate....
> >
> > Strange indeed all across the board....his tone, reasoning and
his
> > timing.
> >
> > ATS: Yes, but after he apparently finished his studies a couple
of months
> > ago, he had to work two different jobs to make ends meet.
Recently he said
> > that he would be able to cut his hours at the second one, but
perhaps
> > something came up and he could not. However, I would not be
surprised if
> > certain parties did apply pressure on him to leave. Stranger
things have
> > emanated from certain quarters here.
> >
> > Valete
> > Pompeia
> >
> > Vale, et valete.
> >
> >
> >
> > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:Nova-Roma%
40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "Maior"
> > <rory12001@> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > M. Horensia Maior A. Minucia Marcella spd;
> >> > Yes,it is weird.Think he got religion? & not the normal
> >> > mainstream kind;-)
> >> > Maior
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > What a weird email.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Vale,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Annia Minucia Marcella
> >>> > > http://minucia.ciarin.com<http://minucia.ciarin.com/><http://minucia.ciarin.com/<http://minucia.ciarin.com/>>
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > ----- Original Message -----
> >>> > > From: Lucius Iunius Bassus
> >>> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:Nova-Roma%
40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
> >>> > > Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 3:45 PM
> >>> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Valete
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I have been terribly irresponsible, and there is no way
that I
> >> > can make up to you or
> >>> > > apologize enough for what I have done: I cannot assume the
> >> > responsibilities of "praetor "
> >>> > > of California, I cannot continue as magister of of
sodalitas
> >> > latinitas (a role that I never
> >>> > > really began anyway), and, especially given the fact of
these
> >> > two decisions, I cannot
> >>> > > continue here in Nova Roma. As I am sure you will agree, I
> > don't
> >> > deserve to. You will
> >>> > > rightly judge me very harshly for having wasted the time
of the
> >> > Senate, for having been the
> >>> > > cause of so much strife and then having betrayed the
faith of
> >> > those who fought for me,
> >>> > > and for being flighty enough to resign again in the space
of a
> >> > year. I cannot justify my
> >>> > > actions to you. I never intended to wrong you, but I made
a
> >> > terrible mistake and I would
> >>> > > wrong you still further by pretending to assume duties
that I
> >> > cannot, and by pretending to
> >>> > > continue in this community when I cannot.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Please do not judge too harshly, however, those who
supported
> > me
> >> > in the Senate. I gave
> >>> > > them every assurance of my sincerity and dedication, and
their
> >> > good judgement was
> >>> > > betrayed by my own poor judgement and gross
irresponsibility.
> > At
> >> > the time I really did
> >>> > > mean to deliver on my promises to them, and perhaps
because of
> >> > this I was all the more
> >>> > > believable to them. I should have known then as I realise
now
> >> > that those promises are
> >>> > > beyond me.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > This email address will be terminated. I ask that no one
in
> >> > authority in NR contact me by
> >>> > > any other means on file with the organization. This marks
the
> >> > termination of all of my
> >>> > > contact with New Rome. I ask that the Censors remove from
Nova
> >> > Roma records my
> >>> > > personal information upon receipt of my resignation of
> >> > citizenship.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Take Martianus as governor of California, and groom Lucia
> >> > Caecilia for leadership there.
> >>> > > Of the latter I can say with certainty that she will not
> >> > dissappoint you as I have.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I cannot and will not give any explanation for my actions
> > beyond
> >> > what I have said here. I
> >>> > > will say only that I would not assume such a disgrace
without
> >> > what are for me very vallid
> >>> > > personal reasons. I am deeply sorry--I know that is not
enough,
> >> > but I am deeply sorry.
> >>> > >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50260 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: a.d. III Id. Mai.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem III Idus Maias; haec dies nefastus publicus est.

"You'll catch sight of the Pleiades, the whole throng together,
When there's one night still left before the Ides.
Then summer begins, as I find from reliable sources,
And spring's tepid season comes to an end." - Ovid, Fasti V

Today is the last day of the Lemuria.

It is quite clear from Plautus that ghost stories, even if not taken
very seriously, aroused a wide-spread interest in the average Roman of
his day, just as they do in the average Briton of our own. They were
doubtless discussed in a half-joking way. The apparitions were
generally believed to frighten people, just as they are at present,
though the well-authenticated stories of such occurrences would seem
to show that genuine ghosts, or whatever one likes to call them, have
the power of paralyzing fear.

In the "Mostellaria", Plautus uses a ghost as a recognized piece of
supernatural machinery. The regulation father of Roman comedy has gone
away on a journey, and in the meantime the son has, as usual, almost
reached the end of his father's fortune. The father comes back
unexpectedly, and the son turns in despair to his faithful slave,
Tranio, for help. Tranio is equal to the occasion, and undertakes to
frighten the inconvenient parent away again. He gives an account of an
apparition that has been seen, and has announced that it is the ghost
of a stranger from over-seas, who has been dead for six years.

"Here must I dwell," it had declared, "for the gods of the lower world
will not receive me, seeing that I died before my time. My host
murdered me, his guest, villain that he was, for the gold that I
carried, and secretly buried me, without funeral rites, in this house.
Be gone hence, therefore, for it is accursed and unholy ground." This
story is enough for the father. He takes the advice, and does not
return till Tranio and his dutiful son are quite ready for him.

Great battlefields are everywhere believed to be haunted. Tacitus
relates how, when Titus was besieging Jerusalem, armies were seen
fighting in the sky; and at a much later date, after a great battle
against Attila and the Huns, under the walls of Rome, the ghosts of
the dead fought for three days and three nights, and the clash of
their arms was distinctly heard. Marathon is no exception to the
rule. Pausanias says that any night you may hear horses neighing and
men fighting there. To go on purpose to see the sight never brought
good to any man; but with him who unwittingly lights upon it the
spirits are not angry. He adds that the people of Marathon worship the
men who fell in the battle as heroes; and who could be more worthy of
such honour than they? The battle itself was not without its
marvellous side. Epizelus, the Athenian, used to relate how a huge
hoplite, whose beard over-shadowed all his shield, stood over against
him in the thick of the fight. The apparition passed him [Pg 25]by and
killed the man next him, but Epizelus came out of the battle blind,
and remained so for the rest of his life. Plutarch also relates of a
place in Boeotia where a battle had been fought, that there is a
stream running by, and that people imagine that they hear panting
horses in the roaring waters.

But the strangest account of the habitual haunting of great
battlefields is to be found in Philostratus's Heroica, which
represents the spirits of the Homeric heroes as still closely
connected with Troy and its neighbourhood. How far the stories are
based on local tradition it is impossible to say; they are told by a
vine-dresser, who declares that he lives under the protection of
Protesilaus. At one time he was in danger of being violently ousted
from all his property, when the ghost of Protesilaus appeared to the
would-be despoiler in a vision, and struck him blind. The great man
was so terrified at this event that he carried his depredations no
further; and the vine-dresser has since continued to cultivate what
remained of his property under the protection of the hero, with whom
he lives on most intimate terms. Protesilaus often appears to him
while he is at work and has long talks with him, and he keeps off wild
beasts and disease from the land.

Not only Protesilaus, but also his men, and, in fact, virtually all of
the "giants of the mighty bone and bold emprise" who fought round
Troy, can be seen on the plain at night, clad like warriors, with
nodding plumes. The inhabitants are keenly interested in these
apparitions, and well they may be, as so much depends upon them. If
the heroes are covered with dust, a drought is impending; if with
sweat, they foreshadow rain. Blood upon their arms means a plague; but
if they show themselves without any distinguishing mark, all will be well.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, "Greek and Roman Ghost Stories", Lacy Collison-Morley
(www.gutenberg.net)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50261 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
---Salve Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Consul, Salvete Omnes:


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@...>
wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>
>
> So it was THOSE people who drove him away!

Consul, I would strongly advise against your drawing such a loose
conclusion from a bit of speculation. I take it this isn't official,
is it?


I hope we find out who THOSE people
> are fast.

Unless you have something more to go on, there's no need to send a
posse out just yet.

Valete
Pompeia


>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia<mailto:pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 11:51 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Valete
>
>
> ---Pompeia Tiberio Galerio Paulino Consul sal.
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-
Roma@yahoogroups.com>, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Savle A. Tullia Scholastica who said in part
> >
> > "However, I would not be surprised if certain parties did apply
> pressure on him to leave.
> > Stranger things have emanated from certain quarters here."
> >
> > Is this idle speculation Praetrix or would you like to name
names?
>
> Pompeia: Why would she have to name names?
>
> Those who've enjoyed indulging in *chronic* name calling,
bullying,
> assorted posturing, threatening etc. etc. have their
documentation
> well *named* in the archives... these behavioral exacerbations I
> believe, being concurrent to some perceived sense of political or
> religious superiority. So with respect Consul, to wonder if
certain
> behaviours might resurface in the present in any situation, by
these
> persons or any others for that matter, is not a possibility
requiring
> excess chin rubbing, really. Not an idle speculation at
all...rather
> an 'educated' one.
>
> vale
> Pompeia
> >
> > Vale
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: A. Tullia Scholastica<mailto:fororom@>
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma%
40yahoogroups.com><mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma%
40yahoogroups.com>>
> > Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 10:34 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Valete
> >
> >
> > > A. Tullia Scholastica Pompeiae Minuciae Straboni quiritibus
> bonae voluntatis
> > > S.P.D.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---Salvete Hortensia Maior, Minucia Marcella et Omnes:
> > >
> > > I, too, found this email *weird*...very, very atypical for
> Bassus,
> > > when compared to his usual calm, well-rationalized offerings.
> > >
> > > ATS: Indeed. Any contact I have had with him in his capacity
as
> a former
> > > student in introductory Latin or as co-magister of the
> Sodalitas Latinitatis
> > > or in any other capacity has been a model of reasonable,
> rational thinking.
> > >
> > >
> > > His
> > > reasons for resigning were quite vague, and his tone had a
> certain
> > > rash, *panicky* feature that I am not used to reading from
> Bassus.
> > >
> > > ATS: Nor am I.
> > >
> > > If he resigned and this is truly his wish, hey, then what can
> we do?
> > > I just hope, though, that no threats or other
> *hyperpersuasions* are
> > > a factor in what seems to be a hasty disappearing act,
without
> any
> > > clear explanation as to why, other than his sudden
> *realization* that
> > > he's not qualified and he should never have bothered the
> Senate....
> > >
> > > Strange indeed all across the board....his tone, reasoning
and
> his
> > > timing.
> > >
> > > ATS: Yes, but after he apparently finished his studies a
couple
> of months
> > > ago, he had to work two different jobs to make ends meet.
> Recently he said
> > > that he would be able to cut his hours at the second one, but
> perhaps
> > > something came up and he could not. However, I would not be
> surprised if
> > > certain parties did apply pressure on him to leave. Stranger
> things have
> > > emanated from certain quarters here.
> > >
> > > Valete
> > > Pompeia
> > >
> > > Vale, et valete.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma%
40yahoogroups.com><mailto:Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "Maior"
> > > <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > M. Horensia Maior A. Minucia Marcella spd;
> > >> > Yes,it is weird.Think he got religion? & not the normal
> > >> > mainstream kind;-)
> > >> > Maior
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > What a weird email.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Vale,
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Annia Minucia Marcella
> > >>> > >
http://minucia.ciarin.com<http://minucia.ciarin.com/><http://minucia.c
iarin.com/<http://minucia.ciarin.com/>>
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >>> > > From: Lucius Iunius Bassus
> > >>> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nova-Roma%
40yahoogroups.com><mailto:Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
> > >>> > > Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 3:45 PM
> > >>> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Valete
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > I have been terribly irresponsible, and there is no way
> that I
> > >> > can make up to you or
> > >>> > > apologize enough for what I have done: I cannot assume
the
> > >> > responsibilities of "praetor "
> > >>> > > of California, I cannot continue as magister of of
> sodalitas
> > >> > latinitas (a role that I never
> > >>> > > really began anyway), and, especially given the fact of
> these
> > >> > two decisions, I cannot
> > >>> > > continue here in Nova Roma. As I am sure you will
agree, I
> > > don't
> > >> > deserve to. You will
> > >>> > > rightly judge me very harshly for having wasted the
time
> of the
> > >> > Senate, for having been the
> > >>> > > cause of so much strife and then having betrayed the
> faith of
> > >> > those who fought for me,
> > >>> > > and for being flighty enough to resign again in the
space
> of a
> > >> > year. I cannot justify my
> > >>> > > actions to you. I never intended to wrong you, but I
made
> a
> > >> > terrible mistake and I would
> > >>> > > wrong you still further by pretending to assume duties
> that I
> > >> > cannot, and by pretending to
> > >>> > > continue in this community when I cannot.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Please do not judge too harshly, however, those who
> supported
> > > me
> > >> > in the Senate. I gave
> > >>> > > them every assurance of my sincerity and dedication,
and
> their
> > >> > good judgement was
> > >>> > > betrayed by my own poor judgement and gross
> irresponsibility.
> > > At
> > >> > the time I really did
> > >>> > > mean to deliver on my promises to them, and perhaps
> because of
> > >> > this I was all the more
> > >>> > > believable to them. I should have known then as I
realise
> now
> > >> > that those promises are
> > >>> > > beyond me.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > This email address will be terminated. I ask that no
one
> in
> > >> > authority in NR contact me by
> > >>> > > any other means on file with the organization. This
marks
> the
> > >> > termination of all of my
> > >>> > > contact with New Rome. I ask that the Censors remove
from
> Nova
> > >> > Roma records my
> > >>> > > personal information upon receipt of my resignation of
> > >> > citizenship.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Take Martianus as governor of California, and groom
Lucia
> > >> > Caecilia for leadership there.
> > >>> > > Of the latter I can say with certainty that she will not
> > >> > dissappoint you as I have.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > I cannot and will not give any explanation for my
actions
> > > beyond
> > >> > what I have said here. I
> > >>> > > will say only that I would not assume such a disgrace
> without
> > >> > what are for me very vallid
> > >>> > > personal reasons. I am deeply sorry--I know that is not
> enough,
> > >> > but I am deeply sorry.
> > >>> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50262 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Salve,

It's weird because of his adamant "lose all contact with me and delete all my info that I ever came here" bit. It's like he's either embarrassed he was apart of this, or he'll get in "trouble" for being on here. People resign or leave NR on occassion and they don't sound as paranoid as him. He can lace his post with all the "Deeply Sorry's" he wants, but it still looks weird.

Now, I don't know about all the drama in California, and frankly I don't care. I'm just saying his e-mail is weird. I think many of the politicians here are like gossip hens anyway. Too much drama for my taste, which is why I like to stay out of the political arena, lest I get fed to the lions, hehe.

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com


----- Original Message -----
From: Mike T
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Valete


I find a resignation with a passionate apology to be anything but weird.

Michael

>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50263 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Salve Consul,

Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> writes:

> So it was THOSE people who drove him away! I hope we find out who THOSE
> people are fast.

Do you realize how much like a southern sheriff after a Klan rally you seem
with that statement? Just because somebody can't name individual people
doesn't mean that a threat is not perceived.

Vale,

CN•EQVIT•MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50264 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Meeting Aurelius Vindex in Dacia (photos).
SALVETE!

Gaius Aurelius Vindex, Legatus Pro Tempore Italia, visited Dacia
between: 30 April to 09 May. It was a very interesting ten days trip.
Aurelius Vindex established the following records:
- he cross the last roman border: Limes Alutanus.
- with his anniversary occasion he took a bathe in roman ancient
tradition and he wear a roman toga.
- he was the first nova roman outside Dacia visiting: Ulpia Traiana
Sarmizegethusa (roman capital), Sarmizegethusa Regia (dacian
capital), Alburnus Maior (the ancient roman mines)and Apulum
(headquarter of Legio XIII Gemina).

This trip is the evidence of the Nova Roma friendship around the
world:

http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/vindex.htm

Per amicitia!

OPTIME VALETE,
IVL SABINVS
Propraetor Dacia.
Caput Trium Daciarum.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50265 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Excuse me for posting this but it needs to be placed before the People.
Regardless of the NR leges and traditions that only Senatores and Tribunes are
to have access to the deliberations of the Senate, there are many ways that
those deliberations find their way into the hands of others. It may be that a
citizen is on the staff of a Senator or Tribune and they receive the
deliberations as part of their job or it may come some other way. Even Senators may
"leak" information for their own purposes to private citizens.

During these times when Nova Roma is floundering to continue its existence,
there are individuals and alliances at work with their own agendas. Iunius
Bassus may have been a dupe or puppet for such an agenda. Had he truly felt
overwhelmed by his perspective duties and wanted to correct his oversight, he
could have taken the Oath of Office, appointed Martianus as procurator to act
in his stead, and then resigned as Governor. Instead, his actions &
subsequent resignation from NR reek of dishonor and places those who supported him
in an embarrassing position.

I hope that NR will be able to move swiftly and decisively to correct the
course of our most pressing concerns.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus,
speaking as a citizen of NR



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50266 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Idle speculation or not, cousin, it is definitely on the minds of many in
Nova Roma at this time. You know, I was not too keen on the discussion about a
special fee to remain in the Senate, cousin, but I am beginning to wonder
whether or not it would be a good idea to propose discussion about instituting
a $50 bond by any candidate who is elected Editor, Quaestor, Tribune,
Praetor, Consul, Censor, or Governor just to help prevent the sort of irresponsible
behavior of those like Iunius Bassus. If the elected official does his or
her job even marginally, the bond is returned at the end of their term. If
they do nothing, disappear, or resign without just cause*, Nova Roma is $50 in
the black.

*Just Cause--military duty, loss of employment, serious illness in the
immediate family, serious personal illness, and such other situations.

Flavius Galerius Aurelianus





************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50267 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Hey now, Marinus, don't you go accusin' my cuz of soundin' like a Southern
sheriff after a Klan gatherin'. Iffen you knew anything about them
sheet-wearin', cowardly, Amway-sellin', no tone gettin', sneakin' DIS-PIC-KA-BLE
lowlifes, you'd know that most of 'em actually live in the North. Downhere in the
South, we know who THOSE PEOPLE are and we is all quite open about sayin'
so--Yankees!

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus




************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50268 From: Thomas Gangale Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Salvete omnes,

I have just read of the resignation of Lucius Iunius Bassus from Nova
Roma. Like all of you, I am shocked. Apparently, we will not receive any
further explanation for his action, and in the absence of it, I would not
care to judge him in any way. Let us not abuse his departure with Parthian
shots. Let us simply say, "Vale!" And not with bitterness over trust
betrayed, nor with malicious pleasure of vindication, but with sadness over
his leaving, yet with hope that he will continue to discover more about
both his strengths and his limitations on his journey through life.

I am also aware that a number of things have been said about me in recent
weeks and months. I will respond to them now.

First of all, my role in the civil war ought to be a closed matter for
anyone of sound judgement. That was eight years ago! Keeping that issue
alive echoes Inspector Javert's relentless pursuit of Jean Valjean over a
loaf of bread stolen 25 years earlier.

Second, in the past couple of weeks I have been in the process of clearing
technicalities with the censors regarding the status of the gens
Martiana. I have consented to the change in spelling to Martiania, and I
expect the gens to be open to new members soon. One individual has already
applied, and it may be that an entire familia will be brought into Nova
Roma en masse. I have asked the gens to rescind its sententia regarding
the removal of mention of Nova Roma from the gens website. Regarding this
last matter, I should point out that I struck a gentleman's agreement
several years ago regarding the reopening of the gens to new members; that
bargain was not kept, possibly due to simple forgetfulness, and likewise
mention of Nova Roma was not restored to the gens website. Certainly there
was intemperance on both sides, and perhaps there were innocent lapses on
both sides as well. In any case, those who say that I defied the laws of
Nova Roma undoubtedly do so without an understanding of the subtleties of
the matter.

Finally, it is quite beyond me how my "involvement in the quest for
habitation on Mars," which probably won't occur until well after I am dead
in any case, can have any bearing on my standing in Nova Roma. Likewise,
why is my activity in American politics a subject for discussion any more
than is my membership in the British Interplanetary Society or my study of
the Italian language? I have been quiescent in the public life of Nova
Roma all these years because of exactly this sort of nattering over
trivialities and irrelevancies. I have many pursuits and interests, and
there is no sense in hiding that. This is a double-edged sword; it means
that I have limited time to devote to Nova Roma, but at the same time, I
have a wealth of experience to apply to whatever duties with which the
Senate chooses to task me. I will not promise anyone the Moon, much less
Mars, but by Mars I ask all of us to put aside partisanship and ancient
grudges and consider the welfare of Nova Roma. Only this way can the
restoration of California possibly succeed, regardless of whom the Senate
chooses to administer the province.

Mars nos protegis!
Marcus Martianius Gangalius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50269 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Marco Martianio Gangalio salutem dicit

For the record... I don't know much about your involvement in the Civil War
of Nova Roma and agree that it was eight years ago! Additionally, I know of
other senatores who have been active in macronational political activism (so
no objection from me on that), so my vote for Bassus and against you as
governor was based soley upon your Gens website. I had initially announced
on the senate my intention to support Bassus, once it came down to actually
voting I wasn't 100% sure who I was going to vote for until I saw your gens
website. I have to be honest in saying that I did not like what I saw.
Nova Roma was not painted in a good light on your site, and there even
seemed contempt for Nova Roma. I didn't see this as a good example of a
provincial governor. I had objections to Gens reform, I loved Gens Modia,
but I think its important that we respect the law.

If you say these things are being fixed then I am pleased to hear this and
you shall have my support for provincial governor.

Vale:

Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus


On 5/13/07, Thomas Gangale <marcus@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I have just read of the resignation of Lucius Iunius Bassus from Nova
> Roma. Like all of you, I am shocked. Apparently, we will not receive any
> further explanation for his action, and in the absence of it, I would not
> care to judge him in any way. Let us not abuse his departure with Parthian
>
> shots. Let us simply say, "Vale!" And not with bitterness over trust
> betrayed, nor with malicious pleasure of vindication, but with sadness
> over
> his leaving, yet with hope that he will continue to discover more about
> both his strengths and his limitations on his journey through life.
>
> I am also aware that a number of things have been said about me in recent
> weeks and months. I will respond to them now.
>
> First of all, my role in the civil war ought to be a closed matter for
> anyone of sound judgement. That was eight years ago! Keeping that issue
> alive echoes Inspector Javert's relentless pursuit of Jean Valjean over a
> loaf of bread stolen 25 years earlier.
>
> Second, in the past couple of weeks I have been in the process of clearing
>
> technicalities with the censors regarding the status of the gens
> Martiana. I have consented to the change in spelling to Martiania, and I
> expect the gens to be open to new members soon. One individual has already
>
> applied, and it may be that an entire familia will be brought into Nova
> Roma en masse. I have asked the gens to rescind its sententia regarding
> the removal of mention of Nova Roma from the gens website. Regarding this
> last matter, I should point out that I struck a gentleman's agreement
> several years ago regarding the reopening of the gens to new members; that
>
> bargain was not kept, possibly due to simple forgetfulness, and likewise
> mention of Nova Roma was not restored to the gens website. Certainly there
>
> was intemperance on both sides, and perhaps there were innocent lapses on
> both sides as well. In any case, those who say that I defied the laws of
> Nova Roma undoubtedly do so without an understanding of the subtleties of
> the matter.
>
> Finally, it is quite beyond me how my "involvement in the quest for
> habitation on Mars," which probably won't occur until well after I am dead
>
> in any case, can have any bearing on my standing in Nova Roma. Likewise,
> why is my activity in American politics a subject for discussion any more
> than is my membership in the British Interplanetary Society or my study of
>
> the Italian language? I have been quiescent in the public life of Nova
> Roma all these years because of exactly this sort of nattering over
> trivialities and irrelevancies. I have many pursuits and interests, and
> there is no sense in hiding that. This is a double-edged sword; it means
> that I have limited time to devote to Nova Roma, but at the same time, I
> have a wealth of experience to apply to whatever duties with which the
> Senate chooses to task me. I will not promise anyone the Moon, much less
> Mars, but by Mars I ask all of us to put aside partisanship and ancient
> grudges and consider the welfare of Nova Roma. Only this way can the
> restoration of California possibly succeed, regardless of whom the Senate
> chooses to administer the province.
>
> Mars nos protegis!
> Marcus Martianius Gangalius
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50270 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Salve Marcus Martianius Gangalius!

>Salvete omnes,

..............

>I am also aware that a number of things have been said about me in recent
>weeks and months. I will respond to them now.
>
>First of all, my role in the civil war ought to be a closed matter for
>anyone of sound judgement. That was eight years ago! Keeping that issue
>alive echoes Inspector Javert's relentless pursuit of Jean Valjean over a
>loaf of bread stolen 25 years earlier.

The Civil war doesn't mean anything to me at the moment, what matters
is where we stand now and what we try to do to make Nova Roma and its
provinces grow both in quantity and in quality.

>Second, in the past couple of weeks I have been in the process of clearing
>technicalities with the censors regarding the status of the gens
>Martiana. I have consented to the change in spelling to Martiania,

I am very happy that You have accepted the Nova Roman name rules. I
congratulate You to his decision!

>and I
>expect the gens to be open to new members soon. One individual has already
>applied, and it may be that an entire familia will be brought into Nova
>Roma en masse. I have asked the gens to rescind its sententia regarding
>the removal of mention of Nova Roma from the gens website. Regarding this
>last matter, I should point out that I struck a gentleman's agreement
>several years ago regarding the reopening of the gens to new members; that
>bargain was not kept, possibly due to simple forgetfulness, and likewise
>mention of Nova Roma was not restored to the gens website. Certainly there
>was intemperance on both sides, and perhaps there were innocent lapses on
>both sides as well. In any case, those who say that I defied the laws of
>Nova Roma undoubtedly do so without an understanding of the subtleties of
>the matter.

I am happy to hear that your stand point towards our Gens laws have changed.

>Finally, it is quite beyond me how my "involvement in the quest for
>habitation on Mars," which probably won't occur until well after I am dead
>in any case, can have any bearing on my standing in Nova Roma.

I certainly agree.

>Likewise,
>why is my activity in American politics a subject for discussion any more
>than is my membership in the British Interplanetary Society or my study of
>the Italian language? I have been quiescent in the public life of Nova
>Roma all these years because of exactly this sort of nattering over
>trivialities and irrelevancies. I have many pursuits and interests, and
>there is no sense in hiding that.

Many of us are active outside Nova Roma and I agree that such things
shouldn't have any influence on ones standing in Nova Roma as long as
it doesn't pose any threat towards the Res Publica and I have never
heard anyone say anything like that about your activities.

>This is a double-edged sword; it means
>that I have limited time to devote to Nova Roma, but at the same time, I
>have a wealth of experience to apply to whatever duties with which the
>Senate chooses to task me. I will not promise anyone the Moon, much less
>Mars, but by Mars I ask all of us to put aside partisanship and ancient
>grudges and consider the welfare of Nova Roma. Only this way can the
>restoration of California possibly succeed, regardless of whom the Senate
>chooses to administer the province.

If You once again will candidate for the position as Governor of
California I will vote for You. I only based my latest vote on the
text on the Gens site that in my eyes seemed very negative towards
the Res Publica. That is a position that I never will accept from any
Governor. It seems as if we have left that behind us and I hope that
the Res Publica now will have a Governor of California that will lead
the provincia into a period of growth. Any Governor of California
that tries to achieve that will have my full support and if needed I
will offer my advise, what ever worth it may have. ;-)

Let's put our differences aside and work together for the best of the
Res Publica.

>Mars nos protegis!
>Marcus Martianius Gangalius

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Senator, Censorius et Consularis
Accensus LAF, Scribae Censoris GFBM
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50272 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Cato M. Martianio Gangalio omnibusque SPD

Salve et salvete.

I am one of those who looked askance at Marcus Martianius, and in fact
voted against him and in favor of L. Iunius Bassus. I spoke in the
Senate House the following:

"The only reason I find that line of thought [that he was angry at the
whole gens reform thing and so issued a brash statement on his website
erasing all mention of the Republic] challenging in this particular
instance is that it is a written document of some length. It is not a
hastily blurted out expression of anger, but a thoroughly-worded,
quite comprehensive piece of prose. It paints the Republic in the very
worst terms and is unforgiving in manner and extent.

I would consider it less influential to some degree if he later made
any kind of statement - publicly - in which this particular stance was
softened or ameliorated in some way; is that the case?"


Now we have said goodbye to Bassus and (as expected) words are being
tossed around on both sides. Marcus Martianius has made a statement
regarding his website and its relationship to the Republic which, in
part, says:

"...I have consented to the change in spelling to Martiania, and I
expect the gens to be open to new members soon....[i]n any case, those
who say that I defied the laws of Nova Roma undoubtedly do so without
an understanding of the subtleties of the matter."

With respect, there is not a question of "subtlety" in the manner in
which the Republic was portrayed on the website, and it is not a
matter of a "gentlemen's agreement" that the laws regarding gens
reform should or should not be obeyed. The Republic was vilified and
either the law is obeyed or it is not.

I am glad that Marcus Martianius has "consented" to obey the law. I am
glad that he will remove his disparaging remarks about the Republic
from his website. But I ask him, and all citizens, to remember that
the Republic is more than a "gentlemen's agreement." If he wants to
have a Roman family-type thing going on in California, he certainly
can; he can call it anything he likes and he can create whatever rules
and boundaries he wishes. But if he desires to be a part of the
Republic, he is not entering a salad bar where some laws are olives
(which he likes) and some are mushrooms (which he does not) so he
makes a salad with only olives in it; we have laws, and they are the
laws - even the ones we do not particularly care for - that bind *all*
citizens together.

If he intends to candidate for a position of government in California,
I would like to be assured that he will not react in the future to
laws with which he may not agree with this in mind.

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50273 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
SALVE ET SALVETE!

You are correct, Martiane Gangali. Let us not abuse his departure
with Parthian shots.

For sure, people who sustained Iunius Bassus candidacy had
constructive intentions at that moment. It's nobody fault.

I respect the people able to stay in Nova Roma. They are very
important because passing by good or bad moments, demonstrated one
important thing: their ability to continue. And to continue, to keep
walking, to move the things on, is one of the most important part of
our life.

For the rest, we have here, in Dacia, a simple proverb: "Water
flows, rocks remain".

VALETE,
IVL SABINVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Gangale <marcus@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I have just read of the resignation of Lucius Iunius Bassus from
Nova
> Roma. Like all of you, I am shocked. Apparently, we will not
receive any
> further explanation for his action, and in the absence of it, I
would not
> care to judge him in any way. Let us not abuse his departure with
Parthian
> shots. Let us simply say, "Vale!" And not with bitterness over
trust
> betrayed, nor with malicious pleasure of vindication, but with
sadness over
> his leaving, yet with hope that he will continue to discover more
about
> both his strengths and his limitations on his journey through life.
>
> I am also aware that a number of things have been said about me in
recent
> weeks and months. I will respond to them now.
>
> First of all, my role in the civil war ought to be a closed matter
for
> anyone of sound judgement. That was eight years ago! Keeping
that issue
> alive echoes Inspector Javert's relentless pursuit of Jean Valjean
over a
> loaf of bread stolen 25 years earlier.
>
> Second, in the past couple of weeks I have been in the process of
clearing
> technicalities with the censors regarding the status of the gens
> Martiana. I have consented to the change in spelling to
Martiania, and I
> expect the gens to be open to new members soon. One individual
has already
> applied, and it may be that an entire familia will be brought into
Nova
> Roma en masse. I have asked the gens to rescind its sententia
regarding
> the removal of mention of Nova Roma from the gens website.
Regarding this
> last matter, I should point out that I struck a gentleman's
agreement
> several years ago regarding the reopening of the gens to new
members; that
> bargain was not kept, possibly due to simple forgetfulness, and
likewise
> mention of Nova Roma was not restored to the gens website.
Certainly there
> was intemperance on both sides, and perhaps there were innocent
lapses on
> both sides as well. In any case, those who say that I defied the
laws of
> Nova Roma undoubtedly do so without an understanding of the
subtleties of
> the matter.
>
> Finally, it is quite beyond me how my "involvement in the quest
for
> habitation on Mars," which probably won't occur until well after I
am dead
> in any case, can have any bearing on my standing in Nova Roma.
Likewise,
> why is my activity in American politics a subject for discussion
any more
> than is my membership in the British Interplanetary Society or my
study of
> the Italian language? I have been quiescent in the public life of
Nova
> Roma all these years because of exactly this sort of nattering
over
> trivialities and irrelevancies. I have many pursuits and
interests, and
> there is no sense in hiding that. This is a double-edged sword;
it means
> that I have limited time to devote to Nova Roma, but at the same
time, I
> have a wealth of experience to apply to whatever duties with which
the
> Senate chooses to task me. I will not promise anyone the Moon,
much less
> Mars, but by Mars I ask all of us to put aside partisanship and
ancient
> grudges and consider the welfare of Nova Roma. Only this way can
the
> restoration of California possibly succeed, regardless of whom the
Senate
> chooses to administer the province.
>
> Mars nos protegis!
> Marcus Martianius Gangalius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50274 From: Thomas Gangale Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Salvete omnes,

I thank Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus and Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus for
their words of welcome and support. As for the gens website, it records a
history that has not always been pleasant, but I am not one who would
rewrite history to please the eyes of current readers. What can be done,
however, is to work for a future that will be more pleasant than was the past.

Optime vale,
Marcus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50275 From: Thomas Gangale Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Nor is the gens Martiania a salad bar. I invite Cato to try the bitter
Calabrian olives. They have always been my favorite.

Marcus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50276 From: Gaius Aurelius Vindex Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Rif: [Nova-Roma] Meeting Aurelius Vindex in Dacia (photos).
Avete Omnes,

ringrazio moltissimo i Novaromani di Dacia
per la cortesia, l'ospitalità e lo splendido servizio fotografico.
Non parlo inglese perciò sono costretto ad usare il traduttore
automatico.
Mi vorrete scusare per questa volta.
I miei pensieri sono stati espressi meglio sulla lista Italica.

Thanks very many the Novaromani of Dacia for the courtesy,
the hospitality and the splendid photographic service. I do not
speak English therefore are forced to use the translator automatic
rifle. You will want to excuse to me for this time. My thoughts have
been expressed better on the Italica list.

Optime Valete
Gaius Aurelius Vindex

-------Messaggio originale-------

Da: Titus Iulius Sabinus
Data: 05/13/07 19:00:11
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] Meeting Aurelius Vindex in Dacia (photos).

SALVETE!

Gaius Aurelius Vindex, Legatus Pro Tempore Italia, visited Dacia
between: 30 April to 09 May. It was a very interesting ten days trip.
Aurelius Vindex established the following records:
- he cross the last roman border: Limes Alutanus.
- with his anniversary occasion he took a bathe in roman ancient
tradition and he wear a roman toga.
- he was the first nova roman outside Dacia visiting: Ulpia Traiana
Sarmizegethusa (roman capital), Sarmizegethusa Regia (dacian
capital), Alburnus Maior (the ancient roman mines)and Apulum
(headquarter of Legio XIII Gemina).

This trip is the evidence of the Nova Roma friendship around the
world:

http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/vindex.htm

Per amicitia!

OPTIME VALETE,
IVL SABINVS
Propraetor Dacia.
Caput Trium Daciarum.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50277 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
---Salvete Equitius Cato Praetor, Marcus Martianius Gangalius et
Omnes:

A comment or two on your well-reasoned post below....


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:
>
> Cato M. Martianio Gangalio omnibusque SPD
>
> Salve et salvete.

[...]
>
>. Marcus Martianius has made a statement
> regarding his website and its relationship to the Republic which, in
> part, says:
>
> "...I have consented to the change in spelling to Martiania, and I
> expect the gens to be open to new members soon....[i]n any case,
those
> who say that I defied the laws of Nova Roma undoubtedly do so
without
> an understanding of the subtleties of the matter."
>
> With respect, there is not a question of "subtlety" in the manner in
> which the Republic was portrayed on the website, and it is not a
> matter of a "gentlemen's agreement" that the laws regarding gens
> reform should or should not be obeyed. The Republic was vilified and
> either the law is obeyed or it is not.
>
> I am glad that Marcus Martianius has "consented" to obey the law. I
am
> glad that he will remove his disparaging remarks about the Republic
> from his website. But I ask him, and all citizens, to remember that
> the Republic is more than a "gentlemen's agreement." If he wants to
> have a Roman family-type thing going on in California, he certainly
> can; he can call it anything he likes and he can create whatever
rules
> and boundaries he wishes. But if he desires to be a part of the
> Republic, he is not entering a salad bar where some laws are olives
> (which he likes) and some are mushrooms (which he does not) so he
> makes a salad with only olives in it; we have laws, and they are the
> laws - even the ones we do not particularly care for - that bind
*all*
> citizens together.
>
> [...]

Respondeo:

Praetor Cato, you are saying that the Republic's laws are not a salad
bar from which we can pick and choose... very well stated. It is an
all or nothing situation, especially for magistrates ( elected or
appointed) and Senators.

You have your answer in 50275 I guess, which in turn challenges you
with 'Nor is the Gens Martiania a salad bar'. So, I take it that the
Republic cannot 'pick and choose' which rules of the gens Martiania
it can obey... or not obey?

To continue quoting: 'I invite Cato to try the bitter Calabrian
olives. They've always been my favourite'. Giving the benefit of the
doubt, I take it that this last sentence was supposed to be funny.
But it seems a fragile time for humour when some pointed questions
are being asked about the Martianius policy regarding the California
governorship. Has this policy in fact changed, or hasn't it? Are we
still in some areas 'negotiating' relations between Nova Roma and
Gens Martianius?

Considering the conceded changes to the Martianius website you
discuss above, plus your analysis, I cannot help but wonder if "the
more things change, the more they stay the same" applies here. And I
am left pondering the same issues as I did during the last vote for
Governor Suffectus of California.



Valete
Pompeia
>
> Vale et valete,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50278 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Meeting Aurelius Vindex in Dacia (photos).
---Salvete Sabine et Omnes:

I'm glad your visit with Gaius Aurelius Vindex and the others went so
well.

I had a chance to sit down and go through these beautiful (as usual)
photos. A nice assortment, showing some detailed architecture,
reliefs, sanctuaries and castles. Alot of history, and a virtual tour
of Dacia for the citizens...but not the same I know as being there,
and having a visit with friends.

Valete
Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Iulius Sabinus"
<iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
>
> SALVETE!
>
> Gaius Aurelius Vindex, Legatus Pro Tempore Italia, visited Dacia
> between: 30 April to 09 May. It was a very interesting ten days
trip.
> Aurelius Vindex established the following records:
> - he cross the last roman border: Limes Alutanus.
> - with his anniversary occasion he took a bathe in roman ancient
> tradition and he wear a roman toga.
> - he was the first nova roman outside Dacia visiting: Ulpia Traiana
> Sarmizegethusa (roman capital), Sarmizegethusa Regia (dacian
> capital), Alburnus Maior (the ancient roman mines)and Apulum
> (headquarter of Legio XIII Gemina).
>
> This trip is the evidence of the Nova Roma friendship around the
> world:
>
> http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/vindex.htm
>
> Per amicitia!
>
> OPTIME VALETE,
> IVL SABINVS
> Propraetor Dacia.
> Caput Trium Daciarum.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50279 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
---

Salvete Omnes:

Is the below post a 'rap'? Maybe I need to get a life :>), but I
don't understand it completely...and I'm English speaking/reading
<sigh>

Ok.... I take it that our Tribune is somehow trying to smooth things
over for his cousin the Consul? (no need, really, he'll live)...but I
don't get the lingo...what is the main idea? Some of the terms must
be regional jargon which I'm not familiar with here in Canada, and I
doubt they make a whole pile of sense to European and Latin American
citizens. And... does the Tribune really speak for all
Southerners...am I understanding this much? I hope not, because I
don't think those residents in southern U.S. (whom I know atleast)
would completely appreciate the respresentation below, to be honest.
It reminds me of Dukes of Hazzard rhetoric, which I know is hardly
representative of the Southern U.S. You remember Boss Hogg and Rosko
P. Coltrey no? That show. I could never understand them either, the
few times I watched them (And I've likely misspelled the names).

A translation would be nice :>) Or maybe just use plain English in
the future :>)


Pompeia

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:
>
> Hey now, Marinus, don't you go accusin' my cuz of soundin' like a
Southern
> sheriff after a Klan gatherin'. Iffen you knew anything about
them
> sheet-wearin', cowardly, Amway-sellin', no tone gettin', sneakin'
DIS-PIC-KA-BLE
> lowlifes, you'd know that most of 'em actually live in the North.
Downhere in the
> South, we know who THOSE PEOPLE are and we is all quite open about
sayin'
> so--Yankees!
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
>
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's free at
http://www.aol.com
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50280 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Actually, it was Sheriff Roscoe P. Coltrane (portrayed by the actor James
Best). In regard to the transliteration that I posted earlier in my post that
was, indeed, meant to use humor in defense of my cousin; the dialect reflects
that of many of my maternal relatives in Dorsey, Mississippi; Birmingham &
Tuscaloosa, Alabama; and northern Georgia (the state in which the fictional
Hazzard Co. was located). There are approximately three or more distinctive
ethnic, regional and dialectic differences in most Southern states with the
exception of Florida, Louisiana, and the Carolinas (which have far more) and
West Virginia (which has less). This refers only to population groups that have
been present for more than fifty years. A native born Southerner can easily
tell the difference between a Geechee dialect from coastal Carolina, a
Tennessee Appalachian, a Louisiana Cajun (Arcadian, to you Canucks), and a Mobile
shrimper.

If you are looking for a more representative television show that
demonstrates some distinct Southern dialects, I would recommend you try old episodes of
Hee-Haw (which ran from the 1960s to 1991). On that show, you had accents
ranging from Bakersfield, California (Buck Owens) to Nashville, Tennessee
(Stringbean & Grandpa Jones). However, I would caution that most Northerners
(Yankees & Canucks) have difficulty picking up on the nuances of Southern
dialects. For more modern tastes, you should be able to tell the dialectic
differences between Jeff Foxworthy and Larry the Cable Guy. Here's a hint; one is
from Texas and one is from Georgia.

For the uninitiated in Southern dialectic transliteration, here is a more
neutral form of my message. First the original post--

"Hey now, Marinus, don't you go accusin' my cuz of soundin' like a Southern
sheriff after a Klan gatherin'. Iffen you knew anything about them
sheet-wearin'sheet-wearin'<WBR>, cowarsheet-wearin'<WBR>, cowardly, Amway-sellin'<
lowlifes, you'd know that most of 'em actually live in the North. Downhere in the
South, we know who THOSE PEOPLE are and we is all quite open about sayin'
so--Yankees!"

Let me interject, Marinus, that you shouldn't accuse my Roman relation of
posting a message that (in your opinion) would be similar to that posted by a
law enforcement officer in the rural areas of the Southern U.S.A. who has
recently attended a meeting of the Ku Klux Klan (see Wikipedia). If you had
actual knowledge of the members of that organization who wear loose hoods & robes
made of various colors to disguise themselves and who are most dispicable
and lacking in individual courage. Individuals who would sell Amway products
(which is based on a pyramid scheme of wealth that is most impractical &
illegal) and who lack the basic talent necessary to sing or act in harmony, you
would realize that the most active members of that racist organization are
based in the northern U.S.A. Most citizens of Southern origin whose families
have been living in the this portion of the country for more than three
generations are quite aware of who "Those People (i.e., trouble makers and rabble
rousers)" are and we are all quite open about saying who we believe they
are--Yankees (invaders from more Northern areas).

Dear lady, I hope that clears up any misconceptions you or others may have
had about the intent and content of my original post.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
aka P. D. Owen








************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50281 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Salve Senator Pompeia,

I work with lots of southerners in the oil patch so I think I got
his drift.

"Now Marinus, do not accuse my cousin (GOOD FRIEND OR AQUAINTANCE)
of sounding like the classical southern sheriff following a Ku Klux
Klan gathering. If you really knew a lot about those sheet wearing,
cowardly Amway (multi-level- marketing), selling poor speaking
detestable low lifes, you would know that most of them actually
live in the Northern states now. At least in the South we know who
these kind of people actually are and we are quite open minded about
saying so - get that you yankees!"

A few points here:

1) It seems to me that the Civil War is not over yet! The last man
standing on the battlefield, yes but not the feelings. Calling a
southerner a Yankee is like calling a Scot or Irish an Englishman.

2) I once got repremanded by one of my bosses from Texas when I
called the conflict 1861-1865 the Civil War. " Boy, is the War Of
Northern Agression " he said. At first I huffed and puffed, thought
of giving him an earfull but when I figured he signed my pay check
and determined my future at that point I couldn't help but agree
with him!

3) Yes, the Ku Klux Klan stretches far; about 20 years back there
was a KKK rally in Provost, Alberta, Canada and one of our Federal
MP's had to get her wings clipped when she falsely claimed there
were cross burnings in British Columbia... well the legend never
dies anyway. What did Alberta have to do with Colonel Forester or
the Carpet Baggers (exploiters of the south during reconstruction).
Yes, seems they are in the North alright.

Well I think I got it right but I leave it to F. Galerius to point
out if I'm far off thje mark on this!


Regards,

QSP




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> ---
>
> Salvete Omnes:
>
> Is the below post a 'rap'? Maybe I need to get a life :>), but I
> don't understand it completely...and I'm English speaking/reading
> <sigh>
>
> Ok.... I take it that our Tribune is somehow trying to smooth
things
> over for his cousin the Consul? (no need, really, he'll
live)...but I
> don't get the lingo...what is the main idea? Some of the terms
must
> be regional jargon which I'm not familiar with here in Canada, and
I
> doubt they make a whole pile of sense to European and Latin
American
> citizens. And... does the Tribune really speak for all
> Southerners...am I understanding this much? I hope not, because I
> don't think those residents in southern U.S. (whom I know atleast)
> would completely appreciate the respresentation below, to be
honest.
> It reminds me of Dukes of Hazzard rhetoric, which I know is hardly
> representative of the Southern U.S. You remember Boss Hogg and
Rosko
> P. Coltrey no? That show. I could never understand them either,
the
> few times I watched them (And I've likely misspelled the names).
>
> A translation would be nice :>) Or maybe just use plain English in
> the future :>)
>
>
> Pompeia
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ wrote:
> >
> > Hey now, Marinus, don't you go accusin' my cuz of soundin' like
a
> Southern
> > sheriff after a Klan gatherin'. Iffen you knew anything about
> them
> > sheet-wearin', cowardly, Amway-sellin', no tone gettin',
sneakin'
> DIS-PIC-KA-BLE
> > lowlifes, you'd know that most of 'em actually live in the
North.
> Downhere in the
> > South, we know who THOSE PEOPLE are and we is all quite open
about
> sayin'
> > so--Yankees!
> >
> > Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ************************************** See what's free at
> http://www.aol.com
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50282 From: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus (Michael Kell Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
Salve F. Galeri Aureliane,

Ah, great minds think alike! Looks like we were writing and posted
at the same time. Looks like you also covered what I thought!

Regards,

QSP



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:
>
> Actually, it was Sheriff Roscoe P. Coltrane (portrayed by the
actor James
> Best). In regard to the transliteration that I posted earlier in
my post that
> was, indeed, meant to use humor in defense of my cousin; the
dialect reflects
> that of many of my maternal relatives in Dorsey, Mississippi;
Birmingham &
> Tuscaloosa, Alabama; and northern Georgia (the state in which the
fictional
> Hazzard Co. was located). There are approximately three or more
distinctive
> ethnic, regional and dialectic differences in most Southern
states with the
> exception of Florida, Louisiana, and the Carolinas (which have
far more) and
> West Virginia (which has less). This refers only to population
groups that have
> been present for more than fifty years. A native born Southerner
can easily
> tell the difference between a Geechee dialect from coastal
Carolina, a
> Tennessee Appalachian, a Louisiana Cajun (Arcadian, to you
Canucks), and a Mobile
> shrimper.
>
> If you are looking for a more representative television show that
> demonstrates some distinct Southern dialects, I would recommend
you try old episodes of
> Hee-Haw (which ran from the 1960s to 1991). On that show, you
had accents
> ranging from Bakersfield, California (Buck Owens) to Nashville,
Tennessee
> (Stringbean & Grandpa Jones). However, I would caution that most
Northerners
> (Yankees & Canucks) have difficulty picking up on the nuances of
Southern
> dialects. For more modern tastes, you should be able to tell the
dialectic
> differences between Jeff Foxworthy and Larry the Cable Guy.
Here's a hint; one is
> from Texas and one is from Georgia.
>
> For the uninitiated in Southern dialectic transliteration, here is
a more
> neutral form of my message. First the original post--
>
> "Hey now, Marinus, don't you go accusin' my cuz of soundin' like
a Southern
> sheriff after a Klan gatherin'. Iffen you knew anything about
them
> sheet-wearin'sheet-wearin'<WBR>, cowarsheet-wearin'<WBR>,
cowardly, Amway-sellin'<
> lowlifes, you'd know that most of 'em actually live in the
North. Downhere in the
> South, we know who THOSE PEOPLE are and we is all quite open
about sayin'
> so--Yankees!"
>
> Let me interject, Marinus, that you shouldn't accuse my Roman
relation of
> posting a message that (in your opinion) would be similar to that
posted by a
> law enforcement officer in the rural areas of the Southern U.S.A.
who has
> recently attended a meeting of the Ku Klux Klan (see Wikipedia).
If you had
> actual knowledge of the members of that organization who wear
loose hoods & robes
> made of various colors to disguise themselves and who are most
dispicable
> and lacking in individual courage. Individuals who would sell
Amway products
> (which is based on a pyramid scheme of wealth that is most
impractical &
> illegal) and who lack the basic talent necessary to sing or act
in harmony, you
> would realize that the most active members of that racist
organization are
> based in the northern U.S.A. Most citizens of Southern origin
whose families
> have been living in the this portion of the country for more than
three
> generations are quite aware of who "Those People (i.e., trouble
makers and rabble
> rousers)" are and we are all quite open about saying who we
believe they
> are--Yankees (invaders from more Northern areas).
>
> Dear lady, I hope that clears up any misconceptions you or others
may have
> had about the intent and content of my original post.
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
> aka P. D. Owen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's free at
http://www.aol.com
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50283 From: Thomas Gangale Date: 2007-05-13
Subject: Re: Valete
As usual, there are the natterers who have some interest in humorlessness,
intentional misinterpretation, picking on wedge issues, and stirring the
pot of discontent and controversy, perhaps to attract attention to
themselves because they are incapable of doing so in any other way. It is
so sad. Let us turn away from such voices; there is so much real work to
be done.

Marcus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
> Respondeo:
>
> Praetor Cato, you are saying that the Republic's laws are not a salad
> bar from which we can pick and choose... very well stated. It is an
> all or nothing situation, especially for magistrates ( elected or
> appointed) and Senators.
>
> You have your answer in 50275 I guess, which in turn challenges you
> with 'Nor is the Gens Martiania a salad bar'. So, I take it that the
> Republic cannot 'pick and choose' which rules of the gens Martiania
> it can obey... or not obey?
>
> To continue quoting: 'I invite Cato to try the bitter Calabrian
> olives. They've always been my favourite'. Giving the benefit of the
> doubt, I take it that this last sentence was supposed to be funny.
> But it seems a fragile time for humour when some pointed questions
> are being asked about the Martianius policy regarding the California
> governorship. Has this policy in fact changed, or hasn't it? Are we
> still in some areas 'negotiating' relations between Nova Roma and
> Gens Martianius?
>
> Considering the conceded changes to the Martianius website you
> discuss above, plus your analysis, I cannot help but wonder if "the
> more things change, the more they stay the same" applies here. And I
> am left pondering the same issues as I did during the last vote for
> Governor Suffectus of California.
>
>
>
> Valete
> Pompeia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50284 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Allegations of Intimidation
It has been suggested that certain parties affected my departure from Nova Roma and my
responsibilities here through the use of threats and intimidation. This could not be
further from the case, and I owe it to both those parties and the restoration of normalcy in
NR to make this one final post and explain as much.

I do not allow myself to be motivated by threats. I never have, and I never will. For that
matter, I certainly would by no means feel at all intimidated by those persons who have
been suggested to have possibly been responsible for my departure.

I did not elaborate on the subject of my personal reasons for leaving precisely because
they are personal--read, "not for the public."

I asked that my personal information be removed from NR records because it is personal
information and I prefer not to leave my personal information in the hands of persons or
organizations with whom I am not affiliated.

I asked that I not be contacted partly out of shame and partly because I'd rather not spend
my time explaining myself to the umpteen people in this organization who have a
constitutional mandate of one variety or another.

If my tone did not seem "typically rational" or if it seemed "somehow agitated" it was
undoubtedly due to the fact that I feel deeply embarrassed for not being able to follow
through with duties for which I volunteered and I was a little emotional.

By the way, Marine, as long as I'm posting: "a young man given to enthusiasms" was
perfect. I always did love that no-nonsense Marine Corps demeanor of yours. Too fair.

Also, as long as I'm posting, my thanks to those who have shown graciousness toward me
in this episode--it was very appreciated. To some of you who have been more quick to
judge: I will not claim that I do not deserve it, but, for whatever its worth, having realized
that I wronged you I did try to do right by you to the extent I was still able. I hope you will
never find yourselves to have similarly erred. Be glad at least that I opted to face this
music rather than just disappear. Your gods themselves must envy your unfailing moral
judgments.

And now, finally, Valete omnes.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50285 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
For an individual who was so quick to leave NR and ask that he not be
contacted, it seems that Iunius Bassus is still following the subject of his
resignation rather closely. I still think it would have been better if he assured
that there would be an orderly transfer of authority in California if he had
taken the Oath of Office and appointed Martianus as procurator before he
resigned. However, his personal reason are his own and he is not the first
elected official to cut and run from our organization.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus,
Tribunus Plebis



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50286 From: Lucius Iunius Bassus Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
Yeah, I'll admit as much. I was curious--I'm only human. Besides, I was contacted and
asked whether or not I'd been intimidated, then I saw that people were tossing around the
idea here, and I thought I should step in and make sure that no one was unjustly crucified.
I know I've been irresponsible, but that doesn't mean that I won't try to assume some
responsibility for the aftermath of my mess.

You're right, though, I couldn't help myself and I wanted to see how people would
respond. And here I am, checking back again and commenting after I've twice already said
"good bye for good"---yet another weakness to tack onto old Bassus' coat. Part of me will
really miss posting here, and I'm having trouble saying goodbye.

As to your suggestion, if I were able to do as much than I'd simply have stayed on and
taken the job myself. I can't in anyway be involved. Besides, imperium in California is the
Senate's to bestow, not mine.

This is a small set back. I feel badly about it, I'd rather not have caused it, but this is a
small setback. Rome will go on--it is the eternal city, afterall.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:
>
> For an individual who was so quick to leave NR and ask that he not be
> contacted, it seems that Iunius Bassus is still following the subject of his
> resignation rather closely. I still think it would have been better if he assured
> that there would be an orderly transfer of authority in California if he had
> taken the Oath of Office and appointed Martianus as procurator before he
> resigned. However, his personal reason are his own and he is not the first
> elected official to cut and run from our organization.
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus,
> Tribunus Plebis
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50287 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
> Salve, Basse, et salvete, quirites bonae voluntatis.
>
>
>
> It has been suggested that certain parties affected my departure from Nova
> Roma and my
> responsibilities here through the use of threats and intimidation. This could
> not be
> further from the case, and I owe it to both those parties and the restoration
> of normalcy in
> NR to make this one final post and explain as much.
>
> I do not allow myself to be motivated by threats. I never have, and I never
> will. For that
> matter, I certainly would by no means feel at all intimidated by those persons
> who have
> been suggested to have possibly been responsible for my departure.
>
> X: Glad to hear that. Some of those same folks have been responsible for
> other departures, however.
>
> I did not elaborate on the subject of my personal reasons for leaving
> precisely because
> they are personal--read, "not for the public."
>
> I asked that my personal information be removed from NR records because it is
> personal
> information and I prefer not to leave my personal information in the hands of
> persons or
> organizations with whom I am not affiliated.
>
> I asked that I not be contacted partly out of shame and partly because I'd
> rather not spend
> my time explaining myself to the umpteen people in this organization who have
> a
> constitutional mandate of one variety or another.
>
> X: And some of us do care. You are not the first to leave NR, or to
> leave office in NR, or to cut off all contact...ashamed that they had not been
> able to perform their duties, or what have you.
>
> If my tone did not seem "typically rational" or if it seemed "somehow
> agitated" it was
> undoubtedly due to the fact that I feel deeply embarrassed for not being able
> to follow
> through with duties for which I volunteered and I was a little emotional.
>
> X: This is understandable. Some who have departed simply vanished; it
> takes bravery...and Romanitas...to make your departure public, especially when
> the wolves have come out to attack yet another citizen. Your choice is yours,
> et mihi quidem, te pudere non debet.
>
> By the way, Marine, as long as I'm posting: "a young man given to enthusiasms"
> was
> perfect. I always did love that no-nonsense Marine Corps demeanor of yours.
> Too fair.
>
> X: Well, you see, Basse, Marinus and I and some others know you. You are
> a highly intelligent, articulate, fine young man...no matter what others here
> may say about you. I don¹t recall anyone lighting into Cornelia H. when she
> left the consular quaestorship in the middle of tax season, dropped all of her
> offices elsewhere, and abandoned her citizenship; I recall some minimal fuss
> when censor suffectus L. Cornelius Sulla Felix vanished after one month of his
> term, leaving then-censor Quintilianus in the lurch, and considerable efforts
> to locate the vanished praetor Noricus as well as repeated and prolonged
> discussion over the legality of Saturninus¹ holding of the tribunate after he
> resigned, but he, and probably they (and many others), were spared some of
> this sort of thing. You can stay, you know, you don¹t HAVE to leave. We need
> good citizens, even if their circumstances make it impossible for them to be
> active, or force them to resign from office. Things can change.
>
> Also, as long as I'm posting, my thanks to those who have shown graciousness
> toward me
> in this episode--it was very appreciated. To some of you who have been more
> quick to
> judge: I will not claim that I do not deserve it, but, for whatever its worth,
> having realized
> that I wronged you I did try to do right by you to the extent I was still
> able. I hope you will
> never find yourselves to have similarly erred. Be glad at least that I opted
> to face this
> music rather than just disappear.
>
> X: Disappearance is the preferred mode here. It, however, is not the
> best thing for a magistrate to do; others are depending on a magistrate, or a
> magisterial assistant, and it is wrong to disappear. Have the decency to face
> up. I, for one, appreciate that.
>
>
> Your gods themselves must envy your unfailing moral
> judgments.
>
> X: Sane.
>
> And now, finally, Valete omnes.
>
> X: Noli discedere. Inter nos sunt qui te diligant.
>
> XAIPE, KAI XAIPETE,
>
> Xanthe sodalitatis Graeciae arkhousa
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50288 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus Fl. Galerio Aureliano salutem dicit

He does seem rather interested in discourse following his resignation and
"departure." All of his "I'm sorry, oh woe is me" rhetoric is wearing
itself out. Seems like he has a martyr complex more than anything. He did
write something that is very interesting to me: "I can't in anyway be
involved." This makes me wonder about the nature of his reason for leaving.

Vale:

Modianus

On 5/14/07, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...> wrote:
>
> For an individual who was so quick to leave NR and ask that he not be
> contacted, it seems that Iunius Bassus is still following the subject of
> his
> resignation rather closely. I still think it would have been better if he
> assured
> that there would be an orderly transfer of authority in California if he
> had
> taken the Oath of Office and appointed Martianus as procurator before he
> resigned. However, his personal reason are his own and he is not the first
>
> elected official to cut and run from our organization.
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus,
> Tribunus Plebis
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50289 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
SALVE ET SALVETE!

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Iunius Bassus"
<iunius_verbosus@...> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I'll admit as much. I was curious--I'm only human.>>>

That's normal.

Besides, I was contacted and asked whether or not I'd been
intimidated, then I saw that people were tossing around the
> idea here, and I thought I should step in and make sure that no
one was unjustly crucified.>>>

You done well.

> I know I've been irresponsible, but that doesn't mean that I won't
try to assume some responsibility for the aftermath of my mess.>>>

Things can be changed. You can stay and when you'll have more time
you can contribute more.

You're right, though, I couldn't help myself and I wanted to see how
people would respond.>>>

The people respond is the evidence that they are people who care.

And here I am, checking back again and commenting after I've twice
already said "good bye for good"---yet another weakness to tack
onto old Bassus' coat. Part of me will really miss posting here,
and I'm having trouble saying goodbye.>>>

You have one simple solution: continue. If you don't want to be
involved in politics, is not a problem. Try something else or just
stay as citizen. Nobody will blame you for that. In fact around the
world we are not so many, and because that, each of us is important.
About voluntary participationÂ…? Here is not a tool to evaluate each
of us. Anybody can contribute with what he can and when he can.
Finally is our personal romanitas, right? What we do, what we can
create in NR, is first for each of us. It's the correlations with
our personal feelings about roman culture and civilization. If you
are part of these, nothing and nobody can disturb you.

VALE ET VALETE,
IVL SABINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50290 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
Cato omnes SPD

Salvete omnes.

This gentleman (the former Lucius Iunius Bassus) may choose to speak
here after cutting off "all contact" with the Republic; however, until
he decides to revoke his words:

"...I cannot continue here in Nova Roma...I ask that the Censors
remove from Nova Roma records my personal information upon receipt of
my resignation of citizenship"

he is not legally a citizen and therefore is not recognized as such.
Under the lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda (art. IV) he is now
a socius. He may re-apply for citizenship if he wishes to do so.

But for the love of (the) God(s), let his "yea" be "yea" and his "nay"
be "nay".

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50291 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: prid. Id. Mai.
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est pridie Idus Maias; haec dies comitialis est.

"The day before the Ides is marked by Taurus lifting
His starry muzzle. The sign's explained by a familiar tale.
Jupiter, as a bull, offered his back to a Tyrian girl,
And carried horns on his deceptive forehead.
Europa grasped his hair in her right hand, her drapery
In her left, while fear itself lent her fresh grace.
The breeze filled her dress, ruffled her blonde hair:
Sidonian girl, like that, you were fit to be seen by Jove.
Often girlishly she withdrew her feet from the sea,
Fearing the touch of the leaping billows:
Often the god knowingly plunged his back in the waves,
So that she'd cling to his neck more tightly.
Reaching shore, the god was no longer a bull,
Jupiter stood there, without the horns.
The bull entered the heavens: you, Sidonian girl, Jove
Impregnated, and now a third of the world bears your name.
Others say the sign is Io, the Pharian heifer,
Turned from girl to cow, from cow to goddess.
On this day too, the Vestals throw effigies made of rushes,
In the form of men of old, from the oak bridge.
Some accuse our ancestors of a wicked crime,
Putting to death men over sixty years of age.
There's an old story, that when the land was 'Saturnia',
Jove, prophetically, said something like this:
'Throw two people into the Tuscan river,
As a sacrifice to the sickle-bearing Ancient.'
Until Tirynthian Hercules came to our fields,
The sad rite was performed each year, as at Leucas:
He threw Quirites of straw into the water:
And now they throw effigies in the same way.
Some think that the young men used to hurl
Feeble old men from the bridges, to steal their votes.
Tell me the truth, Tiber. Your shores pre-date the City,
You should know the true origin of the rite.
Tiber, crowned in reeds, lifted his head from mid-stream,
And opened his mouth to speak these words, hoarsely:
'I saw this place when it was grassland, without walls:
Cattle were scattered grazing on either bank,
And Tiber whom the nations know and fear,
Was disregarded then, even by the cattle.
Arcadian Evander is often named to you:
A stranger, he churned my waters with his oars.
Hercules came here too, with a crowd of Greeks,
(My name was Albula then, if I remember true)
Evander, hero from Pallantium, received him warmly,
And Cacus had the punishment he deserved.
The victor left, taking the cattle, his plunder from Erythea
With him, but his friends refused to go any further.
Most of them had come from deserted Argos:
They established their hopes, and houses, on our hills.
Yet sweet love for their native land often stirred them,
And one of them, in dying, gave this brief command:
"Throw me into the Tiber, that carried by Tiber's waves
My spiritless dust might journey to the Inachian shore."
That funeral duty laid on him, displeased his heir:
The dead stranger was buried in Italian ground,
And a rush effigy thrown into the Tiber instead,
To return to his Greek home over the wide waters.'
Tiber spoke, entering a moist cave of natural stone,
While you, gentle waters, checked your flow." - Ovid, Fasti V

The oldest tradition of the founding of Rome ascribes to Evander the
erection of the Great Altar of Hercules in the Forum Boarium. In
Virgil's Aeneid, where Aeneas and his crew first come upon them,
Evander and his people are engaged in venerating Hercules for having
dispatched the giant Cacus. Virgil's hearers recognized the very same
Great Altar of Hercules in the Forum Boarium of their own day, one
detail among the passages that Virgil has saturated with references
linking a heroic past with the Age of Augustus. As Virgil's backstory
goes, Hercules had been returning from Gades with Geryon's cattle when
Evander entertained him and was the first to raise an altar to this
hero. The archaic altar was destroyed in the Great Fire of Rome in AD
64. Evander was born to Mercury and Carmenta, and his wisdom was
beyond that of all Arcadians. According to Virgil previous to the
Trojan War he gathered a group of natives to a city he founded in
Italy near the Tiber river, which he named Pallantium. Virgil states
that he named the city in honor of his son, Pallas, although Pausanias
says that Evander's birth city was Pallantium, thus he named the new
city after the one in Arcadia. Evander was said to have brought to
Rome the Greek pantheon, laws and alphabet sixty years before the
Trojan War.

Valete bene!

Cato



SOURCES

Ovid, Wikipedia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50292 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Nova Roma Taxes Due, 5/14/2007, 12:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Nova Roma Taxes Due
 
Date:   Monday May 14, 2007
Time:   12:00 pm - 1:00 pm
Repeats:   This event repeats every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday until Thursday May 31, 2007.
Notes:   The Tax Edict (rates, address, other info) is at http://novaroma.org/nr/Tax_rate_%28Nova_Roma%29

NEW! Pay through the Album Civium!

* 1. log in at Album Civium ( http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album )
* 2. go to My Account
* 3. go to "make payment"
* 4. add citizens to the list if paying for multiple citizens
* 5. choose pay pal or check
* 6. if choosing pay pal, continue through pay pal until it sends you back to My Account
* 7. if choosing check, print and mail

 
Copyright © 2007  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50293 From: L. Vitellius Triarius Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Valete
Salvete,

Yep, that pert near sumz it up, Flavy. Well, I'll swann...reckon them
yankees won't never really figure it out noways anyhow. Least, not
anytime soon. Thank yee for takin the time to try explainin it to em,
though. Bin sick lately, so i'm gonna go hit the old rock-n-rye and go
back to bed now. Yee take keer now. Right to yee later, bye.

Vale optime,
Triarius (in the foothills of the Appalachians in East Tennessee)


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:
>
> Actually, it was Sheriff Roscoe P. Coltrane (portrayed by the actor
James
> Best). In regard to the transliteration that I posted earlier in my
post that
> was, indeed, meant to use humor in defense of my cousin; the dialect
reflects
> that of many of my maternal relatives in Dorsey, Mississippi;
Birmingham &
> Tuscaloosa, Alabama; and northern Georgia (the state in which the
fictional
> Hazzard Co. was located). There are approximately three or more
distinctive
> ethnic, regional and dialectic differences in most Southern states
with the
> exception of Florida, Louisiana, and the Carolinas (which have far
more) and
> West Virginia (which has less). This refers only to population
groups that have
> been present for more than fifty years. A native born Southerner
can easily
> tell the difference between a Geechee dialect from coastal Carolina, a
> Tennessee Appalachian, a Louisiana Cajun (Arcadian, to you
Canucks), and a Mobile
> shrimper.
>
> If you are looking for a more representative television show that
> demonstrates some distinct Southern dialects, I would recommend you
try old episodes of
> Hee-Haw (which ran from the 1960s to 1991). On that show, you had
accents
> ranging from Bakersfield, California (Buck Owens) to Nashville,
Tennessee
> (Stringbean & Grandpa Jones). However, I would caution that most
Northerners
> (Yankees & Canucks) have difficulty picking up on the nuances of
Southern
> dialects. For more modern tastes, you should be able to tell the
dialectic
> differences between Jeff Foxworthy and Larry the Cable Guy. Here's
a hint; one is
> from Texas and one is from Georgia.
>
> For the uninitiated in Southern dialectic transliteration, here is a
more
> neutral form of my message. First the original post--
>
> "Hey now, Marinus, don't you go accusin' my cuz of soundin' like a
Southern
> sheriff after a Klan gatherin'. Iffen you knew anything about them
> sheet-wearin'sheet-wearin'<WBR>, cowarsheet-wearin'<WBR>, cowardly,
Amway-sellin'<
> lowlifes, you'd know that most of 'em actually live in the North.
Downhere in the
> South, we know who THOSE PEOPLE are and we is all quite open about
sayin'
> so--Yankees!"
>
> Let me interject, Marinus, that you shouldn't accuse my Roman
relation of
> posting a message that (in your opinion) would be similar to that
posted by a
> law enforcement officer in the rural areas of the Southern U.S.A.
who has
> recently attended a meeting of the Ku Klux Klan (see Wikipedia). If
you had
> actual knowledge of the members of that organization who wear loose
hoods & robes
> made of various colors to disguise themselves and who are most
dispicable
> and lacking in individual courage. Individuals who would sell
Amway products
> (which is based on a pyramid scheme of wealth that is most
impractical &
> illegal) and who lack the basic talent necessary to sing or act in
harmony, you
> would realize that the most active members of that racist
organization are
> based in the northern U.S.A. Most citizens of Southern origin
whose families
> have been living in the this portion of the country for more than
three
> generations are quite aware of who "Those People (i.e., trouble
makers and rabble
> rousers)" are and we are all quite open about saying who we believe
they
> are--Yankees (invaders from more Northern areas).
>
> Dear lady, I hope that clears up any misconceptions you or others
may have
> had about the intent and content of my original post.
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
> aka P. D. Owen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's free at
http://www.aol.com
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50294 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
Salve,

EXACTLY! He's said "goodbye forever!" repeatedly, yet returns. I would guess he's an attention whore, and likes to stir up drama.

If he's going to leave,then he just just leave.

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com


----- Original Message -----
From: Gaius Equitius Cato
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 7:32 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Allegations of Intimidation


he is not legally a citizen and therefore is not recognized as such.
Under the lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda (art. IV) he is now
a socius. He may re-apply for citizenship if he wishes to do so.

But for the love of (the) God(s), let his "yea" be "yea" and his "nay"
be "nay".

Recent Activity
a.. 6New Members
Visit Your Group
SPONSORED LINKS
What's your issue?
Film it. Change the world.

Lip-Sync?
Win a guitar & CD!

See Good Charotte

Contest on Bix!

Yahoo! News
Adventure Beat

Travel the world

with Richard Bangs

Yahoo! 360°
Start Today

Get your own

place online
.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50295 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Taxes
Salve,

I just want to point out one more time that I am STILL not listed as having paid my taxes on the Assidui list. For further proof of my payment via paypal, here is a screenshot of my payment details:

http://www.ciarin.com/romantaxes.jpg

Can those in charge of this please correct it ASAP, otherwise, you can refund my money.

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50296 From: Thomas Gangale Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
Can we not simply say to Bassus, "Vade in pace," and have done with it? We
must drive even the Gods crazy! How about practicing just a bit of Stoicism?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50297 From: Maior Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
M. Hortensia Ganaglio spd;
well I'm no Stoic;-)call me a Pythagorean, but I absolutely agree
with you; it is unRoman to quit office & abandon your duties. We need
to practice to live our Romanitas in daily life. So I give you my best
wishes as propraetor of California, may Fortuna and the gods favour
you.
M. Hortensia Maior
producer 'Vox Romana' podcast
http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/

How about practicing just a bit of Stoicism?
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50298 From: annia@ciarin.com Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
Salve,

I totally agree with this.

Vale,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://minucia.ciarin.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ProvinciaNovaBritannia/

> Can we not simply say to Bassus, "Vade in pace," and have done with it?
> We
> must drive even the Gods crazy! How about practicing just a bit of
> Stoicism?
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50299 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
This is not Rome. This is Nova Roma. If Iunius Bassus had ever had any
genuine intention to actually lead his province, he would have studied the
by-laws of NR and the edicta of his province. He would have known that a governor
can appoint a procurator to assist and, if necessary, assume the mantle of
leadership in the absence or resignation of the governor. Of course, it has
been commented on by several individuals that Iunius Bassus lacked experience
by not having held a praefecture or other office apart from that of an
accensus. I hope, for his sake, that he has finally taken leave of this list so
that he will not have to read any more comments on himself or his actions.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus,
Tribunus Plebis



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 50300 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-05-14
Subject: Re: Allegations of Intimidation
Iulius Sabinus has a valid point. It is not necessary for Iunius Bassus to
leave Nova Roma. He has admitted he wasn't up to be governor. There are
many who are not up for the challenge. He could stay and try to rebuild his
reputation and his personal integrity by continuing to serve the Res Publica by
working under other magistrates. He could learn by observing and giving
service. We have lost the services of many who might have contributed in small
but important ways. Some we drove out with a swift kick to the fundament and
a hardy "Good riddance!"

Iunius Bassus is young and could mature into a future leader of Nova Roma.
I would be willing to give him the benefit of the doubt and allow him to try
again. Of course, I am sure that he will have to bear the burden of close
observation for a time. IF Iunius Bassus does remain, he will have to give up
his rending of garments and hand wringing so he can get back to his tasks.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus,
Tribunus Plebis



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]